Richmond City Council
September 15, 2026

Request for Proposal

Video Surveillance Technologies

Release Date:

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Submittal:

March 27, 2026, 5:00PM

INTRODUCTION

The City of Richmond’s Police Department is currently soliciting proposals for video surveillance technology, specifically Automated License Plate Reader Technology (ALPR) and Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV).

This request for proposal (RFP) describes the project, the required scope of services, the consultant selection process, and the minimum information that must be included in the proposal. Failure to submit information in accordance with the RFP requirements and procedures may be cause for disqualification. The anticipated term of this contract will be for a period of a minimum of three (3) years and an option to renew for additional time and additional services by means of a mutual agreement of both parties.

Vendors are required to read and understand all information contained within this entire Proposal package. By responding to this RFP, the vendor agrees to read and understand these documents.

ABOUT THE CITY

The City of Richmond is a Charter City located in Contra Costa County, part of the San Francisco Bay Area, with a population of approximately 115,353 residents. Richmond is one of the region’s most diverse communities with 45.5 percent of residents identify as Hispanic or Latino, 16.4 percent identify as Black or African American alone, 21.2 percent identify as White alone (not Hispanic or Latino), and 13.8 percent identify as Asian alone.1

Richmond boasts a multi -modal transit hub that includes BART, Amtrak, and AC Transit, along with marinas, shopping centers, recreational and cultural amenities, and 32 miles of shoreline, making it one of California’s most desirable up-and-coming communities.

Richmond operates under a council -administrator form of government, with a Mayor and six council districts represented by elected Councilmembers. The City employs approximately 850 full-time equivalent and part -time employees. The City of Richmond provides a full range of municipal services including police and fire protection; construction and maintenance of highways, streets and infrastructure; library services; storm water and municipal sewer systems; operation of a wastewater treatment facility; and the administration of recreational activities and cultural events. Additionally, the City operates the Richmond Memorial Convention Center and the Port of Richmond, supporting economic development and regional connectivity.

Community Profile1
 Median Household Income: ~$95,000
 Foreign-born Residents: ~34.5%
 Languages: Approximately 54% of residents speak a language other than English at home  Housing: Median home value ~$668,000; owner-occupied housing ~55%  Transportation: Average commute time ~34 minutes; strong public transit access

1 Quick facts Richmond city, California. U.S. Census Bureau. Based on 2024 estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/richmondcitycalifornia

PROJECT BACKGROUND / DESCRIPTION

The City of Richmond Police Department currently uses Flock Safety ALPR and CCTV technology, and as part of its standard procurement process, is soliciting proposals from qualified professionals to determine if Flock Safety is still the best solution for the City of Richmond.

Currently the City of Richmond leases about 110 stationary Flock ALPR cameras, and about 65 stationary CCTV cameras consist of about 20 solar powered fix ed cameras, and 45 pan, tilt, zoom (PTZ) cameras.

Minimum Requirements:

The respondent will be required to provide:
 110 ALPR cameras
 65 CCTV cameras
 Software:
o Complies with all federal , state (SB -274), and local regulations and ordinances.
o Agency controlled and agency owned data.
o Maximum 30-day retention period for ALPR and CCTV data (auto -delete after 30 days).

 Installation of equipment (respondent will not be required to tap into power on City owned light poles).
 Maintenance and support for all equipment and systems for the duration of the contract.
 Submitting the necessary encroachment permits and related documents to the City of Richmond (permit fees may apply).

Preferred:
 Integration with Axon FUSUS Real Time Crime Center software.  Proposed Software can be integrated with other video surveillance technologies, such as drones.
 PTZ cameras preferred over fixed cameras.
 Solar powered ALPR equipment.
 Solar powered fixed CCTV camera.
 Solar powered PTZ CCTV camera.
 Flash Cam style (with audio messaging, flashing strobe, etc)

Optional:
 Portable ALPR equipment (such as in car devices, or portable trailer)  Portable CCTV equipment (such as in car devices, or portable trailer)  Law enforcement drone equipment (indoor and/or outdoor)

Optional Drone Technology (Separate Line Item & Evaluation Category)

The City is requesting optional pricing and technical information for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) for law enforcement use. Drone equipment shall be evaluated independently from the

ALPR and CCTV base proposal.

Submission of drone equipment is optional and shall not impact eligibility for award of the base ALPR/CCTV contract. The City reserves the right to award drone equipment to a different vendor, decline to award drone equipment, or conduct a separate procurement at a later date.

A. Minimum Drone Requirements (If Proposed)
- FAA-compliant UAS platform
- Remote ID compliance
- Secure encrypted communications
- CJIS-compliant data transmission (if evidentiary)
- Secure storage of recorded video
- Ability to disable public cloud sharing
- Chain-of-custody controls
- Public Records Act export capability

B. Drone Capabilities (Describe in Detail)
- Indoor and/or outdoor deployment
- Flight time and battery life
- Wind resistance rating
- Night and/or thermal capability (if applicable)
- Obstacle avoidance
- Launch time
- Live-streaming capability
- Integration with Real Time Crime Center software

C. Separate Evaluation Category – Optional Drone Technology (Up to 10 Points) Regulatory Compliance – 3 Points
Operational Capability – 3 Points
Security & Data Protection – 2 Points
Integration & Scalability – 2 Points

Drone equipment will be evaluated independently from the base ALPR/CCTV proposal.

Any deployment of drone technology shall be subject to approval under applicable City surveillance ordinances and policy adoption requirements prior to operational use.

D. Separate Drone Cost Proposal Format
One-Time Costs:
- Drone platform
- Controllers
- Docking stations (if applicable)
- Software license
- Training
- Implementation

Recurring Costs (Years 1–5):
- Subscription
- Maintenance
- Support
- Escalation percentage disclosure required

Vendors may have access to confidential and sensitive data files and may be subject to a Department of Justice and Criminal History background check. Failure to pass the background check shall exclude any employees of the vendor from access to confidential and sensitive files. All employees of vendors who will participate at the level described above in the project will be required to provide a valid issued driver’s license or equivalent photo identification before they will be permitted to begin work on the project.

Respondent software solutions should be web based and Software as a Service (SaaS) in full compliance with California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) CJIS requirements. (Please see www.oag.ca.gov for latest updates)

TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE, CYBERSECURITY & SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

A. System Architecture:
 Cloud-hosted or hybrid deployment model
 U.S.-based data centers only
 Minimum 99% system uptime SLA
Redundancy and failover capability

B. Cybersecurity Requirements:
 CJIS compliant
 Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+)
 Encryption at rest (AES-256 or equivalent)
 Role-based access controls
 Multi-factor authentication
 12-month audit log retention minimum
 Breach notification within 72 hours
 SOC 2 Type II report or equivalent
 Documented incident response plan
C. Integration Requirements:
 API availability and documentation
 Compatibility with Axon FUSUS (if applicable)
 Ability to integrate with City-approved systems

PROPOSAL FORMAT GUIDELINES

The proposal should be concise, well organized, and demonstrate the proposer’s qualifications and experience applicable to the Project.

Each proposal will adhere to the following order and content of sections. Proposal should be straightforward, concise and provide “layman” explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description

of the offer. Proposals, which appear unrealistic in terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this contract, may be rejected. The following proposal sections are to be included in the Vendor’s response:

A. Vendor Cover Letter
A cover letter should summarize key elements of the proposal and shall:
 Confirm that all elements of this RFP have been reviewed and understood.  Include a statement of intent to perform the services as outlined.  Stipulate that the proposal price will be valid for the duration of the contract.  Identify a single person for contact during the RFP review process; and  Cover letter shall be signed by an authorized official of the company.

B. Background and Project Summary Section
Proposer must have the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the services described in this RFP in a competent and professional manner without the advice or direction from the Police Department. The Respondent warrants that all services and solutions provided meets or exceeds the CJIS Requirements.

C. Scope of Services
Proposer solution must have the ability to provide all of the following services and equipment in Minimum Requirements section

D. Cost Information

Mandatory Pricing Worksheet Template (Excel)

Proposers shall complete and submit the City-provided Pricing Worksheet Template in Excel format. The worksheet includes the following mandatory tabs:

Tab 1 – Instructions
Overview and completion requirements.

Tab 2 – One-Time Costs
Hardware, installation, permitting, training, and project management. Extended cost formulas are pre-programmed. Total One-Time Cost auto-calculates.

Tab 3 – Recurring Costs (Years 1–5)
Annual subscription, hosting, maintenance, and support. Proposer must disclose annual escalation percentage.

Tab 4 – Cost Per Camera
Unit cost per ALPR, CCTV Fixed, and CCTV PTZ camera.

Tab 5 – Cost Per Site
Installed cost for new site and relocated equipment site.

Tab 6 – Three-Year Summary
Auto-summary of total One-Time and Years 1–3 recurring costs.

Tab 7 – Five-Year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Auto-summary of total One-Time and Years 1–5 recurring costs. The Five-Year TCO will be used as the primary cost evaluation metric.

E. Contractor Assignment of Sub-Contract
The resulting contract shall not be assigned, transferred, or sublet, in whole or in

part, without the prior written approval of the Police Department. If Offerors intend to subcontract any portion of the resulting contract, they must describe their process for selecting such subcontractor(s) and the quality control measures that the Offeror will employ to ensure that any subcontractor complies with the provisions of Offeror’s contract with the Department.

F. Exceptions to this Request for Proposals
The proposer shall state whether it takes exception(s) to this RFP, including but not limited to the City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement – RFP (Attachment B). If the proposer does take exception(s) to any portion of the RFP or contract, the spec ific portion to which exception(s) is taken must be identified by section number and explained. Requests for changes or additions to sections of City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement must be shown by requesting deletion of specific words and/or by providing new requested contract language.

Requests for complete replacement of the City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement for another contract will not be granted. Failure to make exceptions to the RFP or Standard Services Agreement within the pr oposal will be deemed a waiver of any objection. Exceptions will be considered during the proposal evaluation process.

G. Statement of Impartiality and Disclosure
This proposal shall include a statement declaring that the proposer’s and sub - consultants are not currently, and will not, during the performance of these services, participate in any other similar work involving a third-party with interests currently in c onflict or likely to conflict with City of Richmond’s interests.

Additionally, proposer is required to disclose any pending or active investigations or litigation that may affect the reputation or ability of the proposer to carry out the Project.

H. Sanctuary City Contracting and Investment Ordinance 12 -18NS_2018, and Resolution 86 -21 (Disclosure Statement of Limited Liability Companies Form.

The City of Richmond’s Sanctuary Contracting Ordinance certification requires the City to refrain from doing business with vendors who provide Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). In addition, City of Richmond Resolution 86-21 requires disclosure of beneficial and responsible owners of Limited Liabilities Corporation (LLC).

I. IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Proposer must submit:
 Detailed project schedule
 Deployment phases
 Permitting timeline
 Risk mitigation plan
 Staffing plan
 Estimated time to full operational deployment

PROCESS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS

Questions Concerning Request for Proposals
Please do not contact staff directly regarding this Proposal which will not be answered.

All questions will be answered promptly and must be submitted via the electronic BidsOnline system on the Q&A tab no later than March 13, 2026, 5:00pm PST. If the City finds it necessary to issue an addendum, prospective Offerors will receive e -mail notification of addendum. It is the proposer’s responsibility to periodically check the BidsOnline website www.ci.richmond.ca.us/ bids for any possible Addenda to the RFP that may have been posted.

Any party submitting a proposal shall not contact or lobby any City Council member, City officials, employee (except those specified for contact) or agent regarding the RFP. Any party attempting to influence or circumvent the RFP, bid submittal, and review process may have their proposal rejected for violating this provision of the RFP.

Interested parties may download copies of the above-mentioned proposal by visiting the City's web site, and to download RFP, new vendors will be required to register. Once the vendor downloads any documents relative to a solicitation, that vendor's name will appear on the Prospective Bidders list for that project and will receive any addenda or notifications relating to the RFP.

Submission of Proposals
Please submit your proposal via the City of Richmond's BidsOnline system. Proposals submitted by facsimile or e-mail are not acceptable and will not be considered.

The proposal and any required certifications shall be signed by an individual or individuals authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the proposer.

Proposer is responsible for submitting its entire package with all required submittal documents and any modifications or revisions, to reach the City of Richmond’s office as designated in the RFP by the time specified below. Any proposal, modification, or revision received by the City of Richmond after the exact time specified for receipt of proposals is “late” and will not be considered.

The proposal must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time, on March 27, 2026.

The City of Richmond reserves the right to waive inconsequential irregularities.

GENERAL GUIDELINES

This RFP does not commit the City of Richmond to award a contract, to defray any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal pursuant to this RFP, or to procure or contract for work. The City of Richmond may reject a proposal without providing the reason(s) underlying the declination. A failure to award a contract to the proposer with the lowest cost proposal shall not constitute a valid cause of action against the City of Richmond.

The City shall not be responsible for work done, even in good faith, prior to final approval of the proposed contract. The City may investigate the qualifications of any respondent under consideration, require confirmation of information furnished by the respondent, and require additional evidence or qualifications to perform the Services described in this RFP.

The City reserves the right to:

1. Reject any or all proposals.

2. Issue subsequent Requests for Proposal.

3. Postpone opening for its own convenience.

4. Remedy technical errors in the Request for Proposal process.

5. Negotiate with any, all, or none of the Respondents.

6. Solicit best and final offers from all or some of the Respondents.

7. Select one or more Respondents.

8. Accept other than the lowest proposed fees.

9. Waive informalities and irregularities in proposals.

Public Records
All proposals submitted in response to this RFP will become the property of the City of Richmond and public records and, as such, may be subject to public review. Documents protected by law from public disclosure will not be disclosed by the City of Richmond if clearly marked with the word "confidential" on each applicable page. Trade secrets may be marked as confidential only to the extent they meet the requirements of California Government Code section 6254.7. Only information claimed to be a trade secret at the time of submittal to the City of Richmond and marked as "confidential" will be treated as a trade secret.

Insurance Requirements
The City of Richmond requires consultants doing business with it to obtain insurance, as shown in Attachment A . The required insurance certificates must comply with all requirements of the standards as shown and must be provided within fifteen (15) days of issuance of the Notice of Intent to Award and prior to the commencement of any work on the Project.

Business Licenses
The successful Contractor and all subcontractors used in the work will be required to hold or to obtain a City of Richmond business license for which the fee will not be waived.

Compliance with City Ordinances
The contractor and all subcontracto rs shall comply with the City of Richmond Nondiscrimination Clauses in City Contracts Ordinance ( Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 2.28 ), Business Opportunity Ordinance ( RMC Chapter 2.50 ), Local

Employment Program Ordinance ( RMC Chapter 2.56 ), Living Wage Ordinance ( RMC Chapter 2.60) and Ordinance Banning the Requirement to Provide Information of Prior Criminal Convictions on all Employment Applications (“Ban the Box”) ( RMC Chapter

2.65), which are incorporated into the Contract Documents by this reference.

Collusion
By submitting a proposal, each respondent represents and warrants that its proposal is genuine and not false or collusive or made in the interest of, or on behalf of any person not named therein; that the respondent has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other person to submit a false proposal, or any other person to refrain from submitting a proposal; and that the respondent has not, in any manner, sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a proposal.

Withdrawal of Proposals
A respondent may withdraw th eir proposal before the expiration of the time for submission of proposals by delivering to the Finance Department a written request for withdrawal signed by, or on behalf of, the respondent.

Ownership of Documents
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems, and any other materials produced for the Project shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part for the Project shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent rights by Respondent in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of the City. The City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright, or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced for this project.

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS
All proposals shall be reviewed to verify that the Res pondent has met the minimum requirements. Proposals that have not complied with requirements do not meet minimum content and quality standards or take unacceptable exceptions to the General Terms and Conditions of the Service Agreement, which will be eliminated from further consideration.

Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by an evaluation committee comprised of City of Richmond personnel.

The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, or to make no award. The City also reserves the righ t to require modifications follow ‐up with requests for additional information, including, but not limited to, follow‐up interviews. The City may request Best and Final offers based upon improved understanding of the offers or changed scope of service. The City will negotiate with that vendor to determine final pricing and contract form. Because this proposal is negotiable, all pricing data will remain confidential until after award is made, and there will be no public opening and reading of Proposals. Overall responsiveness to the RFP is an important factor in the evaluation process.

Vendors that meet the minimum qualifications may be invited to a “Phase II” meeting/demonstration for the evaluation committee for further clarification and consideration. The criteria upon which the evaluation of the proposals will be based include, but are not limited to, the following:

Vendor Qualifications and Experience – Up to 15 Points
The Proposer shall demonstrate sufficient experience, organizational capacity, and financial stability to successfully deliver, implement, and support the proposed solution.

Evaluation under this criterion will consider the Proposer’s demonstrated history of successfully providing similar products and/or services to organizations of compar able size, scope, and operational complexity.

The Proposer’s response shall include, at a minimum, the following:

1. Organizational Background
 Legal name of the firm and years in business
 Corporate structure (public, private, subsidiary, etc.)  Location of headquarters and primary offices
 Description of core business and area (s) of specialization

2. Relevant Experience
 Experience working with similar agencies, industries, or public sector entities (if applicable)
 Demonstrated expertise in delivering solutions of similar size and complexity  Outcomes achieved and measurable results (if available)  References (preferably three within a 100-mile radius)

3. Key Personnel
 Identification of key project staff and their roles
 Qualifications, certifications, and years of relevant experience  Resumes of proposed project leads and subject matter experts

Scope of Work, Methodology and Proposal – Up to 10 Points This category will evaluate the respondent’s ability to take upon itself the responsibilities set forth in the Scope of Services and produce the required outcome in a timely manner.

Consideration will be given of the overall quality of the proposal, includ ing a demonstrated understanding of the purpose, scope, and objective of the services to be performed. It is the intention of the City of Richmond to award a contract to the Respondent who furnishes satisfactory evidence that the Respondent has the requisi te experience and ability to enable the Respondent to execute the work successfully and properly, and to complete services in a timely manner. To determine the degree of responsibility to be credited to the Respondent, the City of Richmond will weigh the evidence that the Respondent has performed other contracts of like nature, magnitude and comparable difficulty and comparable rates of progress.

Usability and User Experience – Up to 25 Points
The proposed solution should be intuitive, efficient, and accessible user experience that minimizes training time and supports high-volume operational environments. The system should enable users to perform core functions accurately and efficiently with minimal complexity.

Evaluation of Usability & User Experience will include, but is not limited to, the following:
 Overall intuitiveness and logical workflow design
 Ease of navigation and task completion
 Screen layout clarity and information hierarchy
 Customization of dashboards, views, and user preferences  Reduction of unnecessary clicks or redundant data entry  Accessibility compliance (e.g., WCAG 2.1 AA standards)  Mobile responsiveness (if applicable)
 Context-sensitive help and tooltips
 Reporting and data visualization usability
 Demonstrated ease of use during product demonstration

Cost Proposal – Up to 30 Points
Vendors are encouraged to submit multiple cost proposals to include optional services and equipment.

The Proposer shall submit a complete and itemized Cost Proposal covering all costs necessary to provide the goods and/or services described in this RFP. Pricing should be clear, detailed, and presented in a manner that allows for comprehensive evaluation.

All costs associated with delivery, implementation, training, documentat ion, project management, travel, taxes (if applicable), and ongoing support shall be included unless otherwise specified.

Proposer shall indicate the period for which pricing shall remain firm, any annual escalation rates, conditions under which pricing may change, and renewal of pricing methodology.

Failure to provide a complete and transparent cost proposal may result in disqualification.

One-Time Costs: Software licensing fees , hardware costs (if applicable) , implementation and configuration, data migration services, training, project management, travel and related expenses, etc.

Recurring Costs : Annual or monthly subscription fees, user or site license fees, maintenance and support, hosting or cloud service fee, upgrade, ongoing licenses, etc.

Option Costs: Optional modules or enhancements, additional training, extended warranties, professional services beyond the base scope, etc.

City may elect to conduct negotiations with the highest ranked proposal respondents for purposes of resolving minor differences and information, clarifying necessary details and responsibilities, emphasizing important issues and points , or r eceiving assurances from respondents.

Selection may be made without further discussion, negotiations, or Offeror’s presentations; therefore, Offeror shall offer the most favorable terms in response to this RFP. Offeror must demonstrate an understanding of the scope of service to be provided and the ability to accomplish the tasks set forth. Offeror should include information that will enable the City to determine the Offeror’s overall qualifications.

The City reserves the right to request additional information or clarification on any matter included in the proposal response, to enable the City to arrive at the final award decision.

Technical Architecture & Security – 20 Points

The Proposer must demonstrate that the proposed solution meets the City’s operational, cybersecurity, data protection, and regulatory compliance requirements. Evaluation under this category will assess the robustness, security posture, reliability, and scalability of the proposed system.

A. System Architecture & Infrastructure (Up to 6 Points) - Deployment model (cloud, hybrid, on-premise)
- U.S.-based data center locations
- Redundancy and failover capabilities
- Disaster recovery procedures (RTO/RPO)
- Minimum 99% uptime SLA
- Scalability for future expansion
- Network and performance standards
- System architecture diagram required

B. Cybersecurity Controls & Risk Management (Up to 6 Points) - CJIS Security Policy compliance
- Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+)
- Encryption at rest (AES-256 or equivalent)
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- 12-month audit log retention minimum
- Documented incident response plan
- Breach notification within 72 hours
- SOC 2 Type II or equivalent certification
- Penetration testing and vulnerability management practices

C. Data Protection & Compliance (Up to 4 Points)
- Compliance with California Civil Code §1798.90.5
- CLETS and CJIS compliance
- SB-34 / SB-741 (if applicable)
- City ownership of all data
- No resale or secondary use of data
- Automatic 30-day data deletion
- Public Records Act export capability
- Data portability upon termination
- Written data destruction certification

D. Integration & Interoperability (Up to 4 Points)
- Documented APIs
- Compatibility with Axon FUSUS (if applicable)
- Integration with City-approved systems
- Future interoperability readiness

Evaluation will consider technical soundness, cybersecurity maturity, regulatory compliance, scalability, and completeness of documentation. The City reserves the right to request additional technical clarification prior to final scoring.

Interviews and Final Selection
The City of Richmond will evaluate written proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFP. Following completion of the written proposal evaluation, the City will rank the proposals and reserves the right to invite the highest ranked proposers to participate in oral interviews and/or presentations.

After completion of interviews, the City will re-evaluate and re-rank proposers based on interview performance, demonstrated understanding of the scope of work, qualifications, and overall ability to meet the City’s needs. Intervi ew results may confirm or change the initial rankings based on written proposals.

The proposer ranked highest after completion of the interview process will be recommended for award, subject to successful contract negotiations, verification of proposer res ponsibility, and approval by the City as required. Participation in interviews does not guarantee selection or award of a contract.

The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive informalities, and to take any action deemed to be in the best interest of the City.

Pre-Award Negotiations
After the proposals are opened, but prior to award, the City may elect to conduct negotiations with the highest ranked respondent for purposes of:
 Resolving minor differences and information
 Clarifying necessary details and responsibilities
 Emphasizing important issues and points
 Receiving assurances from respondents
 Cost/budget clarifications
If the City cannot successfully negotiate a contract with the highest ranked respondent, the City may begin negotiations with the second highest ranked respondent.

Award
When the Review Panel has completed its work, Police Department personnel will then work with the Respondent to complete the administrative paperwork.

Attachments
A. Insurance Requirements
B. Standard Contract
C. Sanctuary City Compliance Statement
D. Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18
E. Limited Liability Corporation (LLC) Resolution No. 86-21 F. Limited Liability Corporation Form

- END -