Minutes — Ripon City Council, April 14, 2026

Ripon City Council Minutes
TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026 – 6:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
CLOSED SESSION AT 5:30 PM
CLOSED SESSION: The closed session meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON CLOSED SESSION MATTERS: No one from the public wished to speak at this time.

ROLL CALL: Council Members Daniel de Graaf, Leo Zuber, Michael Restuccia, Vice Mayor Dean Uecker, Mayor Gary Barton.

OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Kevin Werner, City Attorney Tom Terpstra Jr., City Clerk Lisa Roos.

IN THE MATTER OF:
1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code. a. Liberty Self Storage, L.P. v. City of Ripon; Ripon Consolidated Fire District Case #: STK CV-UWM-2025-0007527
b. City of Ripon v. David Hegarty Case #: STK-CV-UED-2025-7194 c. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority Case #: CV-20-001720
Return to open session.

City Attorney Terpstra said Council met in closed session and no reportable action was taken.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm with Planning Director Zuidervaart leading in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

INVOCATION:

Pastor Phil Krygsheld gave the invocation.

ROLL CALL:

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Gary Barton Mayor Present
Dean Uecker Vice Mayor Present
Michael Restuccia Council Member Present
Leo Zuber Council Member Present
Daniel de Graaf Council Member Present
City Council Page 2 April 14, 2026
OTHERS PRESENT:

City Administrator Kevin Werner, City Attorney Tom Terpstra Jr., Planning Director Ken Zuidervaart, Recreation Director Kye Stevens, Director of Public Works James Pease, Police Chief Daniel Sauer, City Clerk Lisa Roos, Deputy City Clerk Jane Kilgore, Information Systems Technician Elizabeth Farnam.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION:

Emil Guillermo, Ripon Poet Laureate, said he had written a poem about Ripon and proceeded to read.

Guillermo invited the public to Poetry Night at the Ripon Library on April 22, 2026 at 4:00 PM.

John Mangelos said the Roddans are proposing a community brick program to honor notable local contributors and emphasized the positive impact and optics of supporting the effort. He highlighted Rotary’s history of community contributions, noting that projects like this reflect a strong spirit of civic pride and investment. Mangelos expressed concern that the Council may not have had adequate time to fully consider the proposal and its benefits to community engagement.

He encouraged thoughtful discussion and support, stressing the importance of recognizing those who have contributed to the community.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion to approve the minutes of the Regular Ripon City Council meeting of March 10, 2025.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
SECONDER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

1. CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - MAR 10, 2026 6:00 PM APPROVAL OF AGENDA AS POSTED (OR AMENDED):

Motion to approve the agenda as posted.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve the Consent Calendar as posted.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf
City Council Page 3 April 14, 2026

1.1. Income
A. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sales Tax
(March 2025 $259,585.84)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $3,163,117
FY 2024-25 YTD: $3,297,870
Highway Users Tax
(February 2025 $31,772.75)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $300,114
FY 2024-25 YTD: $318,669
SB1 Street & Road Tax
(March 2025 $31,197.51)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $330,526
FY 2024-25 YTD: $326,133
$237,815.45
$35,419.69
$33,735.78
TOTAL $306,970.92
B. CCATT HOLDINGS
Monthly Acacia Avenue Cell Tower Lease Payment
April 2026 $3,500.00
C. WASTE MANAGEMENT
Monthly Franchise Fee Payment – February 2026 $4,984.04

1.2. Bills, Invoices, Payments
A. CORONA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, LLC
General Water System Consulting Services
Progress Payment – Invoice #U-9619 $7,412.50
B. WGR SOUTHWEST, INC.

City Storm Water Permit Assistance
Progress Payment – Invoice #33289 $425.00
C. LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.

Short Range Transit Plan
Progress Payment – Invoice #82868 $377.13
D. J D E ENGINEERING, INC.

Construction Management and Inspection Services
February 2026
Progress Payment – Invoice #1082 $1,875.00
E. LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS H. TERPSTRA, JR.

General Matters
Police Department
Private Development
$4,130.00
$3,411.00
$9,652.50
TOTAL $17,193.50
City Council Page 4 April 14, 2026
F. CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 2025-2026 4th Quarter Deposits:

Workers’ Compensation Program
Liability Program
2025/2026 Cyber Assessment
$170,646.00
$136,509.00
$3,413.00

TOTAL $310,568.00
G. BASECAMP ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Environmental Review for Lawson Drayage
(Reimbursed by Developer)
Progress Payment – Invoice #53021 $8,575.00

1.3. Resolutions
A. RESOLUTION NO. 26-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON

APPROVING THE CITY

ENGINEER'S REPORT IN

CONNECTION WITH THE

PROPOSED FORMATION OF THE

MEADOWOOD ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 26-1, CITY OF

RIPON, COUNTY OF SAN
JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA;

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO

FORM AN ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ASSESSMENTS

PURSUANT TO THE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972 FOR THE

MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN

LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
SYSTEMS; AND SETTING A TIME

AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC

HEARING THEREON
This resolution approves the City
Engineer's Report for the proposed
formation of the Meadowood Assessment
District and sets the time and place of the
public hearing for June 3, 2026 at 10:00
AM in the City of Ripon Council
Chambers.

B. RESOLUTION NO. 26-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON

ACCEPTING THE SAN JOAQUIN
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS’

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027

ADOPTED BY THE SJCOG BOARD
ON MARCH 26, 2026
This resolution accepts the San Joaquin
Council of Governments’ annual
financial plan that describes the proposed
transportation planning activities for
Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

City Council Page 5 April 14, 2026

1.4. Miscellaneous Items
A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
T. Mitchell Engineering Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services
Agreement with T. Mitchell
Engineering & Associates to prepare
design drawings for upgrades to the
compressed natural gas components of
the Ripon Fueling Station in the not to
exceed amount of $99,330 (funding
source: CNG/Fueling Station
Maintenance Reserve Fund).

B. CLAIM
Alejandro Morales Reject the claim filed by Alejandro
Morales.

C. ACCESS AGREEMENT
Nestle USA, Inc. Approve and authorize the Mayor to
sign the Access Agreement with Nestle
USA, Inc. to install a groundwater
monitoring well on City property under
direction and oversight of the Central
Valley Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
**END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**

2. ORDINANCES
Second Reading and Adoption
A. ORDINANCE NO. 935

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON
AMENDING CHAPTER 9.23
"GENERAL RULES FOR CITY PARKS"

OF THE RIPON MUNICIPAL CODE
This Ordinance amends Chapter 9.23
"General Rules for City Parks" to clarify
the process for obtaining a park use permit,
specify when violations of park rules
constitute an infraction or misdemeanor,
and establish protections for open space
areas controlled or operated by the City for
park, recreation, or open space purposes.

City Administrator Werner said staff made two changes based on Council’s feedback at the March 10, 2026 City Council Meeting including a reduction of the timeline from 25 business days to 10 business days for the Recreation Director to approve or deny a park use permit application and the prohibition of personal transportation devices such as electric bikes or motorized scooters on grass areas or non-designated areas within City parks.

City Council Page 6 April 14, 2026
Motion to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 935 amending Chapter 9.23 "General Rules for City Parks" to clarify the process for obtaining a park use permit, specify when violations of park rules constitute an infraction or misdemeanor, and establish protections for open space areas controlled or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
SECONDER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

3. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. RIPON GOLF CLUB CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REIMBURSEMENT
Discussion/Action Approve the Sierra Golf Management
request to fund various improvements at
the Ripon Golf Club in the amount of
$83,245.93 (funding source: Golf Course
Capital Improvement Account Fund).

Recreation Director Stevens said Sierra Golf Management submitted a request to use long-term capital improvement funds for several facility upgrades and the committee conducted a site tour to review the proposals. He noted that the first three items, including the maintenance shed, trees and fencing were recommended for approval. He explained that items four through seven had fallen into disrepair over time, and the Committee supported a one-time approval to bring the course up to acceptable standards.

Stevens said that the Committee is recommending approval of 50% of the total request, amounting to $83,245.93.

Mayor Barton asked for Steven’s impression of the Golf Course after several months of new management. Stevens said staff is impressed with the improvements made and that the owners seem very interested in improving the course.

Council Member de Graaf said he sees a vast difference in the way the course looks and it has vastly improved.

Barton asked if Sierra Golf Management is satisfied with the amount of customers.

Stevens confirmed.

Council Member Zuber said he noticed there are some really positive comments on social media regarding the golf course.

City Council Page 7 April 14, 2026
Approve the Sierra Golf Management request to fund various improvements at the Ripon Golf Club in the amount of $83,245.93.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf
B. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN
Discussion/Action Approve the 2026 Short-Range Transit
Plan that evaluates the transit demand in
Ripon and provides recommended changes
to Ripon transit services designed to
improve mobility and/or cost efficiency
over the next 10 years.

City Administrator Werner stated that the City’s consultant prepared a Short-Range Transit Plan (Plan) for City Council consideration which is intended to serve as a comprehensive 10-year roadmap for transit service operations in Ripon. He said the Plan was developed through a combination of demographic analysis, review of current and regional transit services, projected revenue and funding capacity, and extensive public and stakeholder outreach.

Werner explained that the planning process included an online public survey, on-board rider outreach, stakeholder meetings with major users of the system, such as Bethany Home and other service partners, and a public workshop held with the Council and community to identify transit needs. He said that Ripon’s transit needs differ significantly from other communities due to its demographics and service patterns.

Werner said that the Plan recommends continuing the existing Blossom Express fixedroute service operating on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9:30 AM to 2:30 PM, which provides access to key destinations within Ripon as well as regional destinations in Modesto, Stanislaus County, such as Kaiser medical facilities and Target. He said the Plan also includes a recommendation to retain the service initially and re-evaluate expansion or reduction based on performance data collected after implementation of other service changes.

Werner stated that the Plan also recommends expanding the City’s dial-a-ride program, which is currently operated using volunteer drivers but has experienced reliability challenges, by hiring a part-time driver to provide service Monday through Thursday from 9:30 AM to 2:30 PM. He said the dial-a-ride service would offer trips anywhere within Ripon and Stanislaus County, with proposed fares of $15 per one-way trip for the public and $5 per one-way trip for seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Werner said that the dial-a-ride service boundary is intentionally limited to Stanislaus County to avoid duplication with the existing San Joaquin Regional Transit District VanGo! on-demand service, which already provides regional coverage including Ripon and San Joaquin County destinations through advance reservation.

City Council Page 8 April 14, 2026
Werner said the Plan recommends expanding VanGo! service availability for Ripon residents through a City contract with SJRTD to provide additional evening service on Fridays and Saturdays from 5:00 PM to 9:00 PM year-round. He said the Plan also recommends a dedicated seasonal service to support access to the Ripon Farmers Market operating Thursdays from May through September, providing round-trip access for residents during market hours.

Werner concluded that the Plan is funded through existing restricted transit revenue sources, including Measure K renewal funds, Local Transportation Funds (LTF), and Federal Transit Administration Section 5311 rural transit funds, which have recently become available for operating use following the most recent census designation change.

He noted that the proposal includes dedicating 100 percent of Measure K and Section 5311 funds to transit operations. He said that the Plan includes a phased approach to Local Transportation Funds, increasing the share dedicated to transit from approximately 25 percent up to as much as 85 percent over time. He emphasized that the Plan is intended to serve as a flexible framework and will be adjusted based on future ridership data, funding availability and evolving community needs.

Council Member Restuccia said he feels this service is needed in the City.

Mayor Barton said the study was well done and at a considerable cost and questioned where the funds came from. Werner said the study was funded by LTF funds that had been set aside for this purpose.

Approve the 2026 Short-Range Transit Plan that evaluates the transit demand in Ripon and provides recommended changes to Ripon transit services designed to improve mobility and/or cost efficiency over the next 10 years.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

REPORTS
Department Heads:

Police Chief Sauer said the second quarter Community Meeting will be held on May 6, 2026 at 7:00 PM in the EOC at the Police Department. He said the focus will be on E-bike and motorized scooters safety and rules.

Planning Director Zuidervaart said there is a Planning Commission meeting on Monday, April 20, 2026. He said the Planning Commission will be reviewing a draft update to the accessory dwelling unit ordinance.

Public Works Director Pease reported that March water usage was down 11% compared to 2013 figures, but up 40% from last year.

Pease said that the large item pickup program has begun, and residents can sign up for a one-time pickup of up to four items through September.

City Council Page 9 April 14, 2026
City Council:

Council Member de Graaf thanked everyone for attending and wished his wife a happy anniversary.

Council Member Restuccia thanked those who attended the First Responder Appreciation Day held the previous Saturday, saying that approximately 150 people were in attendance, He said all funds raised went entirely to first responders. He added that Pastor Brett Dood led the event and expressed hope for increased attendance and donations in future years to further support first responders.

Council Member Uecker congratulated de Graaf on his anniversary.

Mayor Barton said First Responder Day was well attended. He recognized the significant time and effort contributed by Mike and Mona Restuccia in organizing the event, noting that it is a valuable community tradition. He added that he was appreciative that the community hosts such an event, emphasizing that supporting police and fire services is a fundamental responsibility of government.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 6:31 PM. (Signed) Gary Barton
Mayor
ATTEST:
(Signed) Lisa Roos
City Clerk
Ripon City Council Minutes
TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2026 – 6:00 PM

REGULAR MEETING
CLOSED SESSION AT 5:30 PM
CLOSED SESSION: The closed session meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION ON CLOSED SESSION MATTERS: No one from the public wished to speak at this time.

ROLL CALL: Council Members Daniel de Graaf, Leo Zuber, Michael Restuccia, Vice Mayor Dean Uecker, Mayor Gary Barton.

OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Kevin Werner, City Attorney Tom Terpstra Jr., City Clerk Lisa Roos.

IN THE MATTER OF:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION pursuant to Section 54956.9(d)(1) of the California Government Code. a. Liberty Self Storage, L.P. v. City of Ripon; Ripon Consolidated Fire District Case #:

STK CV-UWM-2025-0007527
b. City of Ripon v. David Hegarty Case #: STK-CV-UED-2025-7194 c. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority Case #: CV-20-001720
Return to open session.

City Attorney Terpstra said Council met in closed session, staff was given direction and no reportable action was taken.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM with Mayor Barton leading in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

INVOCATION:

Pastor Dave Morris gave the invocation.
1 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 2 March 10, 2026
ROLL CALL:

PUBLIC DISCUSSION:

Emil Guillermo, Poet Laureate, said there is a poetry meeting at the Ripon Library on March 18, 2026 at 4:00 pm.

Guillermo said he had a poem to read for National Women’s Month and proceeded to read it.

Ellon Brittingham, wanted to introduce herself as the new PG&E Representative for Ripon.

Nicholas Melgarejo said he lives by Weston school and wanted to raise some safety concerns he has seen. He believes Stockton Avenue needs reflectors because there is heavy traffic and it is hard to see the middle turn lane. Melgarejo said the center lane on Jack Tone Road to Main Street are not clear and makes it dangerous to turn left onto Ruess Road. Melgarejo said he does not believe the traffic rules are being followed by Weston School and believes it is dangerous for the students.

Mayor Barton asked Public Works Director Pease about the road issues raised by Mr. Melgarejo.

Pease said staff will look into the issue on Stockton Avenue and the striping project for West Ripon Road is going out to bid.

Barton asked Police Chief Sauer if he is aware of any incidents at Weston and Sauer said he is not.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES:

Motion to approve the minutes of the Regular Ripon City Council Meeting of February 10, 2026.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
SECONDER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

1. CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - FEB 10, 2026 6:00 PM 1 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 3 March 10, 2026
APPROVAL OF AGENDA AS POSTED (OR AMENDED):

Council Member Restuccia requested Item 1.2E be pulled from the Consent Calendar to express that he is a paid elected director for the Bank of Stockton.

Motion to approve the agenda as amended.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

1.1. Income
A. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Sales Tax
(February 2025 $545,586.70)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $2,925,301
FY 2024-25 YTD: $3,038,284
Highway Users Tax
(January 2025 $35,003.46)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $264,694
FY 2024-25 YTD: $286,896
SB1 Street & Road Tax
(February 2025 $39,519.50)
FY 2025-26 YTD: $296,790
FY 2024-25 YTD: $294,936
$390,448.23
$33,887.51
$38,049.36
TOTAL $462,385.10
B. WASTE MANAGEMENT
Monthly Franchise Fee Payment – January 2026 $4,722.89
C. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
Quarterly Franchise Fee Payment – December 2025 $17,419.02 D. GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.

Quarterly Franchise Fee Payment – December 2025 $14,699.32 1 Packet Pg. 12
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 4 March 10, 2026
E. MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Annual Franchise Fee Payment - 2025 $189,244.36

1.2. Bills, Invoices, Payments
A. ESTATE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Senior Center Rehabilitation Project
Progress Payment – Invoice #4 $36,848.50
B. PRICE PAIGE & COMPANY
Audit Services
Progress Payment – Invoice #37820 $4,862.00
C. US BANK
California Statewide Community Development Authority
Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds Series 2006C $67,950.00 D. US BANK
California Statewide Community Development Authority
Water Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2012 $8,696.88
E. ITEM E WAS MOVED TO ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT
F. LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS H. TERPSTRA, JR.

General Matters
Police Department
Private Development
$10,944.50
$1,681.50
$487.50
TOTAL $13,113.50
G. SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT
Blossom Express Driver
February 2026 Invoice #AR038364 $2,271.51
H. LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE
Professional Services
Invoice # 315414 $97.00
I. J D E ENGINEERING, INC.

Construction Management and Inspection Services
January 2026
Progress Payment – Invoice #1062 $1,950.00
J. CALIFORNIA CAD SOLUTIONS, INC.

Progress Payment FY 2025-2026
Invoice #701910 $3,937.50
K. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.

Wastewater Discharge Permit Groundwater Monitoring
2025 4th Quarter/Annual Report - Invoice #2522546 $4,985.50 1 Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 5 March 10, 2026
L. LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC.

Short Range Transit Plan
Progress Payment – Invoice #82758 $217.50
M. WGR SOUTHWEST, INC.

City Storm Water Permit Assistance
Progress Payment – Invoice #33102 $425.00
N. VALLEY 29 ELECTRIC, LLC
EV Charging Station Project
Progress Payment – Invoice #2 $17,051.02
O. KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
Ripona Resurface Project
Progress Payment – Invoice #4 $26,229.50

1.3. Resolutions
A. RESOLUTION NO. 26-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON

AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF

CERTAIN FINANCIAL RECORDS,

DOCUMENTS, INSTRUMENTS,

BOOKS, AND PAPERS
This resolution authorizes the destruction
of certain financial records, documents,
instruments, books and papers, in
accordance with the California
Government Code.

B. RESOLUTION NO. 26-11

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON

MAKING FINDINGS AND

DETERMINATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO THE DISABILITY OF

STEPHEN B MEECE WITHIN THE

MEANING OF THE CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'

RETIREMENT LAW
This resolution makes certain findings
and determinations as required under the
California Public Employees' Retirement
Law that Police Sergeant Stephen Meece
is eligible for industrial disability
retirement.
1 Packet Pg. 14
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 6 March 10, 2026

1.4. Miscellaneous Items
A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - AMENDMENT NO. 1
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. to
attend a City Council meeting in-person
and research micro-transit service
models as part of the development of the
Short Range Transit Plan in the not-toexceed amount of $4,340 (funding source: Local Transportation Fund
required transit set aside - current
balance $646,000).

B. EV CHARGING STATION PROJECT
Valley 29 Electric, LLC Accept the work completed by Valley 29 Electric, LLC and authorize the filing
of a Notice of Completion with the San
Joaquin County Recorder’s Office. A
retention amount of $6,969.92 shall be
withheld and will be payable no earlier
than thirty-five (35) days after the
recording of the Notice of Completion
and no later than sixty (60) days from
the date of Council acceptance.

C. LANDSCAPE REPAIR PROJECT
Grover Landscape Services, Inc. Accept the work completed by Grover Landscape Services, Inc. and authorize
the filing of a Notice of Completion
with the San Joaquin County Recorder’s
Office. A retention amount of
$36,915.22 shall be withheld and will be
payable no earlier than thirty-five (35)
days after the recording of the Notice of
Completion and no later than sixty (60)
days from the date of Council
acceptance.

D. LETTER OF ENGAGEMENT
White Brenner, LP Approve and authorize the Mayor to
sign the Letter of Engagement with
White Brenner, LP. Authorize staff to
take all necessary actions to terminate
the City's current contract with Abbott
& Kindermann or its successor.
1 Packet Pg. 15
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 7 March 10, 2026
E. LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Renne Public Law Group Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Legal Services Agreement with
Renne Public Law Group. Authorize
staff to take all necessary actions to
terminate the City's current contract
with Abbott & Kindermann or its
successor.

ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT

1.2E : BANK OF STOCKTON
Semi-Annual Retirement Account Administration
Fees for non-PERS employees $71,940.51
Council Member Restuccia wished to recuse himself from the vote because he is a paid elected director for the Bank of Stockton.

Restuccia left the room.

Motion to approve Item 1.2E Bank of Stockton Invoice.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [4 TO 0]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Zuber, de Graaf
ABSTAIN: Restuccia
Restuccia returned to the meeting.
**END OF CONSENT CALENDAR**
1 Packet Pg. 16
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 8 March 10, 2026

2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Council will take action on the following items at the conclusion of each Public Hearing.

A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT AND HOME PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 This is a public hearing to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on
the recommended use of CDBG and
HOME Program funds allocated to the
City of Ripon.

Recommended Action: Approve the
recommended 2026-2027 CDBG funding
allocation of $78,262 to the Senior Center
Interior Rehabilitation Project and $13,811
to the public service programs that
requested funding. Additionally, approve
the recommended 2026-2027 HOME
Program funds of $24,394 to be allocated
to the low-income down payment
assistance program that is administered by
San Joaquin County. Lastly, direct staff to
process the necessary documentation with
San Joaquin County to facilitate the
allocation of these funds.

Planning Director Zuidervaart introduced Planning Secretary Winters.

Winters said this is the annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds received from HUD and administered through the County.

Winters stated that the CDBG funds are divided into two categories: public works programs and public service programs. For the public service programs, the City received the same four applications as the previous year, three administered through the County and one local application from Bethany Home in Ripon. He said for the public works portion, staff recommends allocating funds to Phase Two of the Senior Center interior improvement project, as Phase One, which focused on exterior improvements, is nearing completion.

Winters also explained that HOME funds are recommended to be allocated toward rental and down payment assistance programs for low-income residents within the City of Ripon, which are administered through the County.

Council Member Zuber expressed concern that the HOME funds being held by the County continue to accumulate and asked whether there were other ways the City could use those funds for projects that would benefit Ripon residents. 1 Packet Pg. 17
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 9 March 10, 2026
Winters responded that the funds must be used for qualifying low-income housing activities. Currently, the City does not have a qualifying project, so the funds are being held as a placeholder for the down payment assistance program. Planning Director Zuidervaart said that the funds could be allocated differently in the future through a public hearing process and that staff intends to bring potential projects and funding recommendations to the Council.

Zuber reiterated his concern about the growing balance held by the County and stated he would prefer the City identify ways to use the funds rather than risk the County reallocating them.

Zuber also asked about the public service funding allocations, noting that the total amount requested by applicants exceeded the available funds and staff proposed reducing each allocation proportionally. He suggested that the City fully fund Bethany Home, the only local applicant, and divide the remaining funds among the three County programs.

Winters said that would be possible. He said that the County programs still provide services to Ripon residents, including the mobile farmers market, Meals on Wheels for seniors, and fair housing and additional down payment assistance programs.

Council Member Restuccia asked whether the accumulating HOME funds were physically held by the County.

Winters confirmed that the funds are held by the County for the down payment assistance program, allowing eligible Ripon residents to apply for assistance through the County.

Restuccia asked whether the funds were earning any interest while being held.

Zuidervaart stated that he was unsure and would need to look into that.

Restuccia commented that if the funds are not earning interest, they would essentially be “dead money,” and expressed interest in learning more about how the funds are being managed.

PUBLIC HEARING OPENED
No one from the public wished to speak at this time.

PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED
1 Packet Pg. 18
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 10 March 10, 2026
Motion to approve the 2026-2027 CDBG and HOME Programs funding allocations with Bethany receiving the fully requested amount and the remaining funds be divided between the other three agencies by percentage requested and direct staff to process the necessary documentation with San Joaquin County to facilitate this grant program.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
SECONDER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

3. ORDINANCES
First Reading and Introduction
A. ORDINANCE NO. 935

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON
AMENDING CHAPTER 9.23
"GENERAL RULES FOR CITY PARKS"

City Administrator Werner explained that Chapter 9.23 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes the rules and regulations governing the use of City parks and recreational facilities. The proposed ordinance updates presented to the City Council were developed with input from several departments, including the City Manager’s office, City Attorney, Parks and Recreation Director, Chief of Police, and City Clerk.

Werner stated that staff is proposing changes in three primary areas. The first set of changes updates the park use permit process for organized events and activities held in City parks.

The current language in the Municipal Code does not reflect the process that is actually being used. The proposed revisions align the code with the existing process, which primarily involves the Parks and Recreation Director and the Recreation Commission, and clarifies their respective responsibilities.

Werner said the second group of changes clarifies which violations of the prohibited conduct provisions in City parks are considered infractions and which would be prosecuted as misdemeanors. Staff reviewed the Code and revised the language to clearly distinguish between the two.

Werner said the third set of changes adds language intended to protect natural areas within open spaces owned, controlled, or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes. Werner said the riparian habitat along the river is an example of open space and explained that the new language would prohibit activities such as excavation, grading, or other alterations in those areas.
1 Packet Pg. 19
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 11 March 10, 2026
Werner said that staff identified an additional item that is not included in the current draft.

Staff would like to add language expanding the existing prohibition on driving or parking motor vehicles on park lawns to also include personal transportation devices, such as e-bikes and e-scooters.

Werner said there is a minor clean-up item in Section 050A, where the ordinance currently states a timeframe in two different ways. Staff plans to clarify this language when the ordinance returns for the second reading.

Council Member Restuccia thanked staff for addressing the riparian habitat concerns and asked about the penalties associated with violations. He said that the ordinance references penalties and remediation requirements but does not clearly state the specific fine amounts, and expressed concern that penalties should be high enough to discourage violations.

City Attorney Terpstra explained that misdemeanors carry a $1,000 fine per violation, but additional state laws may apply in cases involving riparian habitat damage or endangered species. In such cases, fines under state law could range from $25,000 to $50,000, depending on the violation. He said that the ordinance allows the City to recover costs for any remediation efforts if habitat damage occurs.

Restuccia responded that while the explanation was helpful, the ordinance references another section for penalties, meaning readers would need to consult that section to determine the specific fines. Terpstra confirmed that the language is intentionally broad so penalties can be cumulative and flexible, allowing enforcement to cover a wide range of potential violations.

Restuccia asked about the provision allowing 25 business days to approve or deny a park use permit, stating that the timeframe seemed too long and suggesting the process should take closer to five to ten days.

Recreation Director Stevens explained that permits can often be approved sooner and that the longer timeframe was originally tied to the requirement for Recreation Commission review, which is no longer necessary. Stevens said staff could reduce the timeframe but noted applicants still need time to submit materials such as insurance documentation and allow staff to review availability.

Restuccia suggested 10 business days as a more appropriate timeframe. Staff agreed to review the language and potentially bring back a revised timeframe.

Mayor Barton asked Police Chief Sauer whether park violations in the riparian area are primarily committed by Ripon residents or visitors from out of town. Sauer said it is a mixture of both, though there tends to be more activity from non-residents during summer weekends.

Barton asked how the City plans to publicize the new rules and penalties. Werner explained that signage has been drafted for placement at park and trail entrances informing visitors of the prohibited activities, potential fines, and encouraging the public to report violations to the Ripon Police Department.
1 Packet Pg. 20
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 12 March 10, 2026
Motion to waive the first reading and introduce Ordinance 935 amending Chapter 9.23 "General Rules for City Parks" to clarify the process for obtaining a park use permit, specify when violations of park rules constitute an infraction or misdemeanor, and establish protections for open space areas controlled or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes and include changes discussed.

RESULT: FIRST READING [UNANIMOUS] Next: 4/14/2026 6:00 PM MOVER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
SECONDER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf
Second Reading and Adoption
B. ORDINANCE NO. 934

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON
AMENDING CHAPTER 10.10 "SPEED
LIMITS" OF THE RIPON MUNICIPAL
CODE
This ordinance amends Chapter 10.10,
“Speed Limits,” of the Ripon Municipal
Code to update the posted speed limits of
five roadway segments, based on the
findings of the 2025 Engineering and
Traffic Survey.

City Administrator Werner said this is the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 934 amending Chapter 10.10, “Speed Limits,” of the Ripon Municipal Code to update the posted speed limits of five roadway segments, based on the findings of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey.

Motion to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 934 amending Chapter 10.10, “Speed Limits,” of the Ripon Municipal Code to update the posted speed limits of five roadway segments, based on the findings of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
SECONDER: Leo Zuber, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. RIPON CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT: UPDATE ON FIRE SUPPRESSION

ASSESSMENT
Discussion/No Action Chief DeHart will provide an update to the City Council on the Fire District’s efforts
pursuing a fire suppression assessment
pursuant to Proposition 218 to hire the
additional staff necessary to improve
response times that have increased as a
result of concurrent calls.
1 Packet Pg. 21
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 13 March 10, 2026
Ripon Consolidated Fire District Chief DeHart provided an update on the Ripon Fire District’s (District) proposed benefit assessment, or Proposition 218, and the progress toward placing it before property owners. He explained that the primary need for the assessment is the increasing number of concurrent calls for service, which reached 986 in 2025, averaging about 2.7 per day. These calls occur when crews are already responding to another incident, forcing firefighters to triage calls or rely on mutual aid from neighboring jurisdictions.

DeHart reported that the District has been working with a consultant to review and categorize parcels that transferred from the County and to develop the engineer’s report, including clear indexing language that both attorneys and the public can understand. The District is also preparing an outreach strategy to educate the community about the proposal.

DeHart said that he has been meeting with major stakeholders and property owners, including representatives from the City, schools, Bethany Home, local businesses, the wine industry, and major businesses to explain the proposal and discuss potential assessments. DeHart noted that while no one favors new taxes, most conversations have been professional and understanding once the District’s financial history and service demands are explained, including the fact that revenues have remained largely unchanged since 1985.

DeHart highlighted the support of a community advisory group of about 25 members, who provide feedback from a citizen perspective. In addition, the District is using social media and local media outreach, including coordination with the Manteca Bulletin, to share information and provide context about the District’s needs and past decisions, such as the construction of Station 3.

DeHart said the District hopes to finalize the engineer’s report soon, with a draft expected by April or May. If approved, ballots could be mailed in late May or early June, followed by a 45-day voting period, with results expected around the August Fire Board meeting.

Additional town hall meetings will be held to inform residents and answer questions as the process moves forward.

Council Member Uecker asked how the public response to the proposal has been. DeHart stated that most feedback has been positive, although there is still significant work to do.

He said that negative comments have been few, and while everyone supports strong fire and police services, people sometimes disagree on how to fund them.

Council Member Restuccia acknowledged the positive response and commented that the outreach efforts and committees involved appear to be thorough. He noted that although Ripon’s population is not growing significantly, the aging population is increasing demand for services. He shared an example of a resident who had to wait for assistance from another city, which reinforced the need for the proposed funding measure.

DeHart responded that the District has seen more third and fourth concurrent calls this year, often requiring assistance from Manteca or Escalon, resulting in an average 14- minute response time for those calls. He explained that although the City’s population 1 Packet Pg. 22
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 14 March 10, 2026
growth has been limited, only about 21 new home permits in five years, the aging population and growth in surrounding communities are increasing service demands. He said without new development generating revenue, the District must rely on the existing customer base for funding.

Council Member de Graaf thanked him for his communication efforts and encouraged continued outreach to help residents understand the benefits of the proposed funding measure.

Mayor Barton commented that recent media coverage and social media discussions about concurrent calls are likely helping inform the public. He also noted that some residents mistakenly believe the District is part of the City, and he appreciated that District staff have been clearly explaining that the District is an independent agency with a separate funding structure. He added that several residents he spoke with have become more supportive of the proposal over time.

Barton asked DeHart about the indexing component of the assessment, which had been a concern during the previous attempt.

DeHart explained that the prior proposal included a 3% cap, but some residents interpreted it as an automatic yearly increase. He emphasized that the District has historically been very conservative with spending, which contributed to the current financial challenges. He noted that the Board is reviewing the indexing language carefully and plans to present a clearer version, though final details have not yet been approved.
de Graaf added that in similar funding measures, governing boards often set a maximum allowable increase but rarely implement the full amount, instead reviewing financial needs each year before deciding on adjustments. He said that this will likely remain a common question from the public.

Barton concluded by thanking Chief DeHart for his leadership and reaffirmed the City’s support and partnership, expressing hope that the effort will successfully secure stable funding for the Fire District.

REPORTS
Department Heads:

Planning Director Zuidervaart said there will not be a March Planning Commission Meeting.

Public Works Director Pease said February water numbers were within 1% of last year’s numbers.

Pease said staff is working on changes to Ripon Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 “Garbage Collection and Disposal” that will include some general clean-up as well as Council’s request to extend the Annual Brush Pick-Up Program by one week.
1 Packet Pg. 23
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes) City Council Page 15 March 10, 2026
City Council:

Council Member de Graaf thanked everyone for coming and sharing their concerns.

Council Member Restuccia said April 4 is the 8th Annual First Responder Appreciation Day. He said instead of giving out t-shirts they are going to give the money to the first responders.

Mayor Barton thanked Kelly Donohue and the Ripon Chamber of Commerce staff for their work creating a fabulous Almond Blossom festival.

Barton said the City’s Spring Newsletter highlighted the City’s crime statistics over the past ten years showing the reduced crime rate.

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 PM. (Signed) Gary Barton
Mayor
ATTEST:
(Signed) Lisa Roos
City Clerk
1 Packet Pg. 24
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 10, 2026 6:00 PM (Approval of Minutes)

1.1.A.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: 2026 01 advance (5030 : State of California) State Controller's Office
Remittance AdviceHighway Users Tax CitiesClaim Schedule: 2500315 and 2500315AIssue Date: March 4, 2026Fiscal Year: 2025-2026Collection Period: January 24, 2026 - February 23, 2026Description: Streets and Highways Code sections 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107 and 2107.5.For assistance, please contact Lucas Rasmussen at 916-323-1374 or at [email protected].

City Population Section 2103 Section 2105 Section 2106 Section 2107 Section 2107 Snow
(Included in Section
2107 Amount) Section 2107.5 Gross Claim
Withheld/Return of
Funds due to
Delinquent Annual
Street Report Payment Amount Year To Date
Ripon City Treasurer 15,988 $12,818.21 $8,292.66 $5,619.76 $8,689.06 $0.00 $0.00 $35,419.69 $0.00 $35,419.69 $300,113.70

1.1.A.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: fy2526_2hwycityra (5030 : State of California) State Controller's Office
Remittance Advice
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) - Cities Claim Schedule: 2500331 and 2500331A
Issue Date: March 20, 2026
Fiscal Year: 2025-2026
Collection Period: February 01, 2026 - February 28, 2026 Description: Streets & Highways Code section 2032(h)(2), Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account allocation to cities.

For assistance, please contact Maria Abugarade Rayo at 916-890-3689 or at [email protected].

City Population Payment Amount Year To Date
Ripon City Treasurer 15,988 $33,735.78 $253,641.04
1 of 1

1.1.A.c
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: rmra_cities_remit_2526_mar26 (5030 : State of California)

1.1.B.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: CCATT (4998 : CCATT Holdings)

1.1.C.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: WASTE MANAGEMENT (5032 : Waste Management)
202602 Total
CR Cash Receipts 1 Commercial $ 28,705.18 $ 28,705.18
CR Cash Receipts 2 Roll Off $ 33,595.38 $ 33,595.38
CR Cash Receipts 3 Residential $ - $ -
CR Cash Receipts 4 $ -
CR Cash Receipts 5 $ -
CR Cash Receipts TTL Total Cash Receipts $ 62,300.56 $ 62,300.56 FFA Franchise Fee Payable 1 Franchise Fees Due $ 4,984.04 $ 4,984.04 FFA Franchise Fee Payable 2 $ -
FFA Franchise Fee Payable 3 $ -
FFA Franchise Fee Payable 4 $ -
FFA Franchise Fee Payable 5
FFA Franchise Fee Payable TTL Total Franchise Fee Payable $ 4,984.04 $ 4,984.04 FFR Franchise Fee Rate 1 Franchise Fee Rate 8%
Amount: $ 4,984.04
Administrative Coding
WM VndrNo: 386801
Ripon, CA 95366
Monthly Franchise Fee Payment
For the Month Ended February 2026
Section Description Line Description
259 N Wilma Ave
Stockton Scavengers
(a USA Waste of California, Inc. company)
1240 Navy Dr, Stockton, CA 95296
City of Ripon

1.1.C.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: WASTE MANAGEMENT (5032 : Waste Management)

Page 1 of 2 ends

Bill To:

Attn: Kevin Werner
City of Ripon
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon CA 95366
Invoice Number: U-9619
Invoice Date: 3/19/2026 Billing Through: 2/28/2026
Payment Terms: Net 30 Due Date: 4/18/2026

I N V O I C E
Current Inception
Description Period to Date
Project: CCR REPORT 2024-2026
Funded Value: $45,000.00 Remaining Funded Value: $24,820.00 Task: 1. 2024 CCR Assistance
Consulting Services
Hours Rate
Chakmak, Alex Senior Professional --- $280.00 $ --- $ 1,680.00 Hennecart, Louisa Administrator --- $125.00 $ --- $ 2,687.50 Samson, Carleigh Senior Professional --- $255.00 $ --- $ 4,717.50 Total for Consulting Services: $ --- $ 9,085.00
Total for Task 1. 2024 CCR Assistance: $ --- $ 9,085.00 Task: 2. General Consulting May 2025-April 2026
Consulting Services
Hours Rate
Gorman, Craig Principal Professional 3.00 $335.00 $ 1,005.00 $ 1,842.50 Gregory, Brittany Senior Professional 4.50 $265.00 $ 1,192.50 $ 1,192.50 Samson, Carleigh Senior Professional 19.00 $255.00 $ 4,845.00 $ 5,100.00 Seidel, Chad Partner 1.00 $370.00 $ 370.00 $ 2,960.00
Total for Consulting Services: $ 7,412.50 $ 11,095.00
Total for Task 2. General Consulting May 2025-April 2026: $ 7,412.50 $ 11,095.00 Total for Project CCR REPORT 2024-2026: $ 7,412.50 $ 20,180.00 REMIT TO ADDRESS: Work Included assistance with Well #19 Chrome-6 Compliance Plan Please remit all payments via ACH to:

Corona Environmental Consulting, LLC
BMO Bank
Account Number: 4846556417
Routing Number: 0710-25661
If you have any questions, please contact [email protected] or 303.544.2161 Total Amount: $ 7,412.50 $ 20,180.00
Total Amount Due This Invoice: $ 7,412.50

1.2.A.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: 2026.2.28 Invoice U-9619 (5035 : Corona Environmental Consulting, LLC)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Invoice Number: U-9619
Invoice Date: 3/19/2026

I N V O I C E
Current Inception
Description Period to Date
REMIT TO ADDRESS:

Please remit all payments via ACH to:

Corona Environmental Consulting, LLC
357 McCaslin Blvd
Ste 100
LOUISVILLE Colorado 80027
United States
J. PEASE
4-3-26

1.2.A.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: 2026.2.28 Invoice U-9619 (5035 : Corona Environmental Consulting, LLC)

INVOICE
DATE
3/18/2026
INVOICE NO.
33289

INVOICE TO
City of Ripon
259 N. Wilma Ave.

Ripon, CA 95366
Attn: Christina Giedd

SITE ADDRESS
259 N. Wilma Ave.

Ripon, CA
TERMS
Net 30

PROJECT
783.PRI
P.O. NO.

Total
WGR Southwest, Inc.
11021 Winners Circle, Suite 101 · Los Alamitos, CA 90720 · 562.799.8510 Credit card payments accepted online at https://secure.wgr-sw.com/payments.html

SERVICED DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT
2/2/2026 Post-construction standards plan review for 1504 W Colony Rd - EV Charging Stations, second review, approved
1 425.00 425.00
$425.00

1.2.B.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Invoice 33289_WGR (5027 : WGR Southwest, Inc.)

1.2.C.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Invoice 82868_LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc (5026 : LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.)

1.2.C.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Invoice 82868_LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc (5026 : LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.)

INVOICE
J D E Engineering, Inc
1490 Boulder Creek Ct
Manteca, CA 95336-9109
[email protected]
+1 (209) 328-1124
www.jde-eng.com
City of Ripon:25-001 City of Ripon Inspection Services
Bill to
Attn: Carla Rodriguez
City of Ripon
259 N Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
Invoice details
Invoice no.: 1082
Terms: Net 30
Invoice date: 03/13/2026
Due date: 04/12/2026
Product/service Description Quantity Rate ($/hour) Current amount due
Task 1: Construction Inspection Services
For work performed thru February 28th, 2026
Construction Inspection Provided construction inspection services for the following: onsite electroliers and
electrolier conduit system and driveway at
Dexter Way. Offsite traffic control, storm
drain, and concrete and site SWPPP BMP
review. See attached inspection
breakdown.

12.5 $150.00 $1,875.00
Total $1,875.00
to k e n = a 0 e 1 8 d b c 0 2 2 f4 d 9 a 8 4 7 a a 7 8 0 0 3 d 1 c d d b c c 0 e 7 2 6 6 3 6 c b 4 d 4 5 8 5 6 d 5 7 7 3 d 0 e e 0 e e 8 f1 5 8 f3 0 e 6 f4 e 4 ff 6 8 c e b b fb 1 4 8 f7 6 f8 9

1.2.D.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Invoice 1082_JDE Engineering, Inc (5025 : JDE Engineering, Inc.) City of Ripon Inspection Services
Meadowood Subdivision
February 2026

DATE HOURS CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED
2/2/2026 3.5 MORENO Install pull ropes for electroliers and stand electroliers in subdivision TEICHERT Pothole utilities on Fulton Avenue, set traffic control signs (Farwest Traffic), and grade driveway on Dexter Way at Mangelos Circle west. 2/3/2026
4 TEICHERT Install storm drain pipe curb inlet runs on Fulton Avenue, pour inlet bases and set inlet riser pipe. Grade driveway and install AB at driveway on Dexter Way at Mangelos Circle west. Set traffic control signs for road closure (Phase 1).

ARNAUDO Begin irrigation box modification on Fulton Avenue MORENO Set electroliers in park areas, adjust roadway electroliers in subdivision, install pull ropes for electroliers, and adjust electolier on Goodwin Drive 2/6/2026
4 TEICHERT Pour 12" concrete bands on Fulton Ave. roundabout at Colony, form driveway at Dexter Way and Mangelos Circle west, set DW and NPW in subdivision.

ARNAUDO Tie rebar and pour new pressure manhole top on SSJID box in Fulton Avenue. 2/13/2026 1 LENNAR Site review for SWPPP BMP's and progress of off-site work.

TOTAL 12.5

1.2.D.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Invoice 1082_JDE Engineering, Inc (5025 : JDE Engineering, Inc.) Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.

P.O. Box 443
Ripon, CA 95366
United States
Phone: 209-985-9273
Invoice
Invoice Number 00160
Matter General
Date of Issue 03/28/2026
Payment Terms Due Date
Due Date 04/27/2026
Billed To
City of Ripon
259 North Wilma Avenue
Ripon, California 95366
United States
$4,130.00 due 04/27/2026
Time Entries
Date Attorney Description Hourly Rate Qty Line Total
03/02/2026 Tom Terpstra Review EV charging station
project approvals and
conditions, review DA and
discuss with K. Zuidervaart.

Correspondence with K.

Werner and K. Zuidervaart re
same.
$295.00 1.9 $560.50
03/02/2026 Tom Terpstra Weekly meeting with K.

Werner re City matters.
$295.00 0.4 $118.00
03/05/2026 Tom Terpstra Review and finalize various
agenda items, including final
revisions to parks ordinance.
$295.00 0.8 $236.00
03/10/2026 Tom Terpstra Prepare for and attend
Council meeting.
$295.00 1.9 $560.50
03/13/2026 Tom Terpstra Review Nestle access
agreement and send
comments to K. Werner.
$295.00 0.7 $206.50
03/13/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with K. Werner re RMA
matter. Review
correspondence re same.
$295.00 0.3 $88.50
03/13/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with opposing counsel re
missed meeting re easement.

Correspondence with K.

Werner and attorney re
same.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/16/2026 Tom Terpstra Correspondence with
opposing counsel re meeting
$295.00 0.2 $59.00

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) re easement.
03/16/2026 Tom Terpstra Weekly meeting with K.

Werner re City matters.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/19/2026 Tom Terpstra Prepare for and meet with
opposing counsel and
landowner re easement site.
$295.00 0.9 $265.50
03/20/2026 Tom Terpstra Review CPRA request re
ADA compliance, research re
ADA regulations for websites.

Correspondence with staff re
same, correspondence with
K. Werner re same.
$295.00 1.7 $501.50
03/24/2026 Tom Terpstra Review follow up letter from
ADA public records
requester. Research re
claims and advise client re
response.
$295.00 1.7 $501.50
03/24/2026 Tom Terpstra Weekly meeting with K.

Werner re City matters.
$295.00 0.4 $118.00
03/24/2026 Tom Terpstra Review letter from Liberty
Storage re wastewater
permit. Draft response and
send to counsel.
$295.00 1.9 $560.50
03/25/2026 Tom Terpstra Further research re CPRA
request re ADA compliance.
$295.00 0.3 $88.50
03/26/2026 Tom Terpstra Conference with J. Kilgore re
CPRA response.
$295.00 0.5 $147.50
Time Entries Total: 14 $4,130.00
Total $4,130.00
Amount Due $4,130.00
Outstanding Invoices
Number Due Date Amount Payments Balance
00160 (current) 04/27/2026 $4,130.00 $0.00 $4,130.00
Outstanding Balance $4,130.00

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.

P.O. Box 443
Ripon, CA 95366
United States
Phone: 209-985-9273
Invoice
Invoice Number 00161
Matter Police Department
Date of Issue 03/28/2026
Payment Terms Due Date
Due Date 04/27/2026
Billed To
City of Ripon
259 North Wilma Avenue
Ripon, California 95366
United States
$3,411.00 due 04/27/2026
Time Entries
Date Attorney Description Hourly Rate Qty Line Total
03/10/2026 Tom Terpstra Brief conference with J.

Heuvel re PRA request.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/13/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with C. Caro re various
PRA requests.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/16/2026 Tom Terpstra Review and respond to
multiple PRA and related
document requests and
advise re same, conference
with C. Caro re same.
$295.00 2.1 $619.50
03/16/2026 Tom Terpstra Review hearing officer
decision re dangerous
animal, coordinate with PD re
next steps.
$295.00 0.9 $265.50
03/17/2026 Tom Terpstra Call from Tracy City Attorney
re dangerous animal appeal,
review court records and
investigate same. Update K.

Werner re same.
$295.00 1.5 $442.50
03/17/2026 Tom Terpstra Review email regarding the
Nicole Torbet v. City of Tracy
(City of Ripon) and case
details online. Contact SJC
Court regarding correction of
respondent’s name and
disposition status.

Correpsondence with THT
regarding the same.
$80.00 0.3 $24.00

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) 03/18/2026 Tom Terpstra Follow up on dog appeal
petition with Superior Court.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/18/2026 Legal
Secretary
Minute Order for dangerous
animal hearing.

Correspondence to THT
regarding the same.
$80.00 0.3 $24.00
03/19/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with City of Tracy re
dangerous animal appeal,
coordinate with secretary re
court minute order.
$295.00 0.7 $206.50
03/23/2026 Tom Terpstra Meeting with Chief Sauer and
Lt. Heuvel re park
misconduct matter. Research
re same.
$295.00 2.1 $619.50
03/25/2026 Tom Terpstra Monitor court processing of
dangerous animal appeal.
$295.00 0.2 $59.00
03/26/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with Tracy re dangerous
animal appeal in court,
research re same. Revise
letter from RPD to appellant
and send to Chief Sauer for
review.
$295.00 3.3 $973.50
Time Entries Total: 12 $3,411.00
Total $3,411.00
Amount Due $3,411.00
Outstanding Invoices
Number Due Date Amount Payments Balance
00161 (current) 04/27/2026 $3,411.00 $0.00 $3,411.00
Outstanding Balance $3,411.00

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.

P.O. Box 443
Ripon, CA 95366
United States
Phone: 209-985-9273
Invoice
Invoice Number 00159
Matter Private Development - 222 E. 4th Street
Date of Issue 03/28/2026
Payment Terms Due Date
Due Date 04/27/2026
Billed To
City of Ripon
259 North Wilma Avenue
Ripon, California 95366
United States
$9,652.50 due 04/27/2026
Time Entries
Date Attorney Description Hourly Rate Qty Line Total
03/02/2026 Tom Terpstra Meeting with K. Werner and
K. Zuidervaart re project.

Review property history.
$325.00 2.1 $682.50
03/03/2026 Tom Terpstra Calls with K. Werner and K.

Zuidervaart re meeting.

Research property history
and related matters. Prepare
for meeting.
$325.00 2.9 $942.50
03/04/2026 Tom Terpstra Meet with Lawson, Guntert,
Hakeem, and development
group. Prepare for same.

Follow up meeting with K.

Werner and K. Zuidervaart.
$325.00 2.1 $682.50
03/12/2026 Tom Terpstra Review draft response
document from Zuidervaart.
$325.00 1 $325.00
03/16/2026 Tom Terpstra Continue reviewing project
response letter, conference
with K. Werner re same.
$325.00 1.2 $390.00
03/19/2026 Tom Terpstra Correspondence with
Hakeem re status of City
response.
$325.00 0.2 $65.00
03/23/2026 Tom Terpstra Further research re property
and related legal matters.
$325.00 1.8 $585.00
03/24/2026 Tom Terpstra Meeting with K. Werner and
K. Zuidervaart re project.
$325.00 1.2 $390.00
03/25/2026 Tom Terpstra Revise response document
to Guntert/Lawson.
$325.00 1.7 $552.50

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) 03/25/2026 Tom Terpstra Research re PFFP and CIP
fee programs.
$325.00 3.1 $1,007.50
03/26/2026 Tom Terpstra Meeting with Ken re property
history, further research re
fee program and property.
$325.00 4.8 $1,560.00
03/30/2026 Tom Terpstra Continue researching City fee
program and application to
project. Calls with staff re
same.
$325.00 4.5 $1,462.50
03/31/2026 Tom Terpstra Call with K. Werner re
response. Finalize draft
response and send to K.

Werner and K. Zuidervaart for
review.
$325.00 2.8 $910.00
04/01/2026 Tom Terpstra Review correspondence from
client and applicant re
responses and application.
$325.00 0.3 $97.50
Time Entries Total: 29.7 $9,652.50
Total $9,652.50
Amount Due $9,652.50
Outstanding Invoices
Number Due Date Amount Payments Balance
00159 (current) 04/27/2026 $9,652.50 $0.00 $9,652.50
Outstanding Balance $9,652.50

1.2.E.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Terpstra Invoices-March (5039 : Law Office of Thomas H. Terpstra, Jr.) Please make check payable to CSJVRMA and remit payment to the above address.

Delinquent amounts shall be assessed a 1% penalty plus interest at a rate of 10% per annum.

CSJVRMA ACCEPTS ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS
To obtain ACH/wiring instructions, please contact
Joe Roy, Finance Manager or Ian Freeman, Accounting Associate [email protected] (916) 244-1155 ~ [email protected] (916) 244-1120

CSJVRMA INVOICE
1750 Creekside Oaks Dr Invoice #: INV0513
Suite 200 Invoice Date: 03/23/2026
Sacramento, CA 95833 Due Date: 05/07/2026

Bill To:

CITY OF RIPON
259 NORTH WILMA AVENUE
RIPON, CA 95366
United States
Description Amount
4th Quarter Workers' Compensation Program Premium $170,646.00 4th Quarter Liability Program Premium $136,509.00
ResoluteGuard Cyber Assessment $3,413.00
Amount Due $310,568.00

1.2.F.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Sales Invoice-INV0513 (5031 : CSJVRMA 2025/2026 4th Quarter) Basecamp Environmental, Inc.
802 West Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
+12092248213
[email protected]

INVOICE

BILL TO
City of Ripon
259 N Wilma Ave.

Ripon, CA 95366
INVOICE # 53021
DATE 04/01/2026
DUE DATE 05/01/2026
TERMS Net 30

PROJECT
Ripon Bess Project

PERIOD DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT
02/04/2026 Ray Kapahi 1 8,575.00 8,575.00
Services through the invoice date. Thank you. We
appreciate your business.

BALANCE DUE $8,575.00
Pay invoice *Paid through Reimbursement Agreement with Lawson Drayage, Inc. * K. Zuidervaart
04/07/2026

1.2.G.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Invoice 53021 (5042 : BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.)

INVOICE
Ray Kapahi,
DBA Environmental Permitting Specialists
7068 Riverside Boulevard
Sacramento, CA 95831
BILL TO Invoice Date
BaseCamp Environmental, Inc. 2609 4-Feb-26
802 West Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
PROJECT(S) Terms
Date Hours Amount
10-Oct-25 6.0 $1,050
to 32.0 $5,600
1-Feb-26 11.0 $1,925

49.0 $8,575.00
Please Make Checks Payable to: "R. Kapahi DBA Environmental Permitting Specialists" * * NEW* * We accept Credit Cards, Venmo and Zelle

TOTAL THIS INVOICE
Task 3 - Summarize history of previous fires.

Incomplete
Reference
City of Ripon Battery Storage Project Per Scope of Work and Cost Estimate Oct 10, 2025. Copy Attached 30 Days
Task 1 - Peer review of Community Risk Report. Completed Dec 12, 2025 Task 2 - Model Emissions of air toxics and issue report. Completed Dec 12, 2025
Phone: (916) 806-8333 E-Mail: [email protected] File: 2026 Invoices.xlsx

1.2.G.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Invoice 53021 (5042 : BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.) City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Kevin Werner, City Administrator
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution RECOMMENDED ACTION:

This resolution approves the City Engineer's Report for the proposed formation of the Meadowood Assessment District and sets the time and place of the public hearing for June 3, 2026 at 10:00 AM in the City of Ripon Council Chambers.

BACKGROUND:

The Meadowood Residential Subdivision project was approved on February 13, 2018 to develop 88 single family residences west of Fulton Avenue. As part of the Conditions of Approval, the developer is required to support the formation of a Landscape Maintenance District in order to provide funding for the landscaping the City of Ripon is responsible to maintain, which generally includes:
 Landscaping, irrigation, and structures along the project frontage on Fulton Avenue  Landscaping and irrigation along the Fulton Avenue median along the project frontage  Landscaping and irrigation along Goodwin Avenue median DISCUSSION:

Pursuant to the provision of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California and Proposition 218, the City Council conducts proceedings for the formation of the City of Ripon Landscape Maintenance Districts as outlined in the table below.

Formation of Landscape Maintenance District Check List
Step Description
1 City Council adopts the resolution of intention to undertake proceedings for the formation of an assessment district directing the City Engineer to prepare a report in connection with the proposed formation of the assessment district. (1st Formation Resolution)
2 City Council adopts the resolution approving the Engineer’s Report in connection with

1.3.A
Packet Pg. 47
the proposed formation of the assessment district, declaring its intention to form an assessment district and setting a time and place for a public hearing. (2nd Formation Resolution)
3 City Council adopts the resolution directing the formation of the assessment district. (3rd Formation Resolution)
4 City submits required documents to County to set up new tax code required to levy the assessment.

DISCUSSION:

The attached resolution is the second step in forming Meadowood Assessment District No. 26-1.

Attachments:

1. Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27

1.3.A
Packet Pg. 48
RESOLUTION NO. 26-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RIPON APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT IN

CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF THE
MEADOWOOD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 26-1, CITY OF
RIPON, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, CALIFORNIA;

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO FORM AN ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS

PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972 FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN
LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; AND

SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING

THEREON
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ripon, as follows:

1.Previous hereto pursuant to Resolution No. 26-6 entitled a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Ripon of its intention to undertake proceedings for the formation of an assessment district to be known as Meadowood Assessment District No. 26-1, City of Ripon, County of San Joaquin, California, to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 for the maintenance of certain landscaping and irrigation systems; and directing the City Engineer to prepare on behalf of the City of Ripon an Engineer's Report.

2. The proposed assessment district shall be designated the Meadowood Assessment District No. 26-1, City of Ripon, County of San Joaquin, California and shall include the land as shown on The Meadowood Final Map designated “Assessment Diagram, Assessment District No. 26-1, City of Ripon, County of San Joaquin, California.” Final Map is on file with the City Clerk and is hereby approved.

3. The City Engineer of the City of Ripon has prepared the City Engineer’s Report dated April 14, 2026 with respect to the proposed Assessment District No. 26-1. A copy of said Engineer’s Report is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Ripon does hereby accept the City Engineer’s Report with respect to the proposed Assessment District No. 26-1 (Exhibit “A”) declaring its intention to form said Assessment District.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED as follows:

1. Notice is hereby given that the 3rd day of June, 2026 at the hour of 10:00 AM in the Council Chambers, Ripon City Hall, 259 N. Wilma Avenue, Ripon, California, is the time and place fixed by this Council for a public hearing on the proposed formation of Assessment District No. 26-1 and the levy of the proposed assessment as set forth in the City Engineer’s Report and any other matters contained therein. Official Ballots shall be mailed or otherwise

1.3.A
Packet Pg. 49
delivered to the owners of the affected property at least (45) days prior to the Public Hearing.

Ballots shall be received up to the close of the public hearing.

2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a copy of this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ripon at least once. Said publication is to be completed at least (45) days before the date of said public hearing.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ripon this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

RESULT: ADOPTED BY CONSENT VOTE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER:Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

THE CITY OF RIPON,
A Municipal Corporation
By ________________________________
GARY BARTON, Mayor
ATTEST:

By: ___________________________
LISA ROOS, City Clerk

1.3.A
Packet Pg. 50
259 North Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
T 209.599.2108
F 209.599.2685
www.cityofripon.org
Meadowood
Assessment District No. 26-1
ENGINEER’S REPORT
FY 2026/27
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

AND ARTICLE XIIID OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I – OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION II – DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND IMPROVEMENTS .................... 2 SECTION III – METHOD OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD........................................................ 3 SECTION IV – DISTRICT BUDGET........................................................................................ 4 SECTION V – CERTIFICATION.............................................................................................. 6 APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND FINAL MAP ........................................... 7 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL ................................................................................... 15

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 1
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
SECTION I – OVERVIEW
The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq.) authorizes cities, counties, and special districts to establish Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts to finance a broad range of services and activities, including, but not limited to, the construction, maintenance, and operation and servicing of landscape improvements and irrigation systems; as well as staffing, administrative costs; materials; equipment; contracted services, and other items necessary for the proper maintenance of the improvements within the District.

Pursuant to this authority, the City of Ripon (“City”) proposes to establish a new Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (the “District”) for the purpose of funding the ongoing maintenance and servicing of public landscaping and related improvements that provide a special benefit to identified parcels within the proposed District boundaries.

In November 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, known as the “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Articles XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. Proposition 218 imposes substantive and procedural requirements on the imposition of assessments by local agencies, including requirements related to special benefit, proportionality, and property owner approval through a weighted ballot proceeding.

This Engineer’s Report has been prepared in compliance with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and the requirements of Article XIII D of the California Constitution. The Report describes the proposed District boundaries, the improvements to be maintained, the estimated annual costs of maintenance and servicing, and the methodology used to apportion the proposed assessments among the benefited parcels. Assessments are proposed to be levied only on those parcels that receive a special benefit from the improvements, and each assessment is proportional to the special benefit conferred, as required by Article XIII D.

For purposes of this Report, the term “parcel” refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Parcel Number by the San Joaquin County Assessor’s Office. These parcel numbers are used by the San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller to identify properties subject to benefit assessments on the property tax roll.

Following the preparation and filing of this Engineer’s Report, the City Council will conduct a public hearing and a property owner balloting process in accordance with Proposition 218. Upon consideration of public testimony and the results of the weighted ballot proceeding, the City Council may elect to establish the proposed District and authorize the levy and collection of assessments. If approved, the assessments will be levied annually and submitted to the County Auditor-Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each benefiting parcel.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 2
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
SECTION II – DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES AND IMPROVEMENTS The plans and specifications for the improvements to be maintained by the District are voluminous and, therefore, are not included in this Engineer’s Report. Said plans and specifications are on file in the office of the City Engineer and are incorporated herein by reference.

The boundaries of the Assessment District are described in the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of Ripon (Resolution No. 26-6) dated February 10, 2026 and are shown on the Meadowood Subdivision Tract No. 4019 Final Map recorded on March 10, 2026 and in the Assessment Diagram included in Appendix A – Assessment Diagram and Final Map.

The improvements to be maintained by this District shall include the following:

1. All surface and underground improvements (planting, irrigation, bio-swales, landscape maintenance, groundcover and mulch, perimeter wall and pilasters, and sidewalk) contained in Lots D and E along Fulton Avenue.

2. All landscaping improvements (planting and irrigation) within the center roadway median on Fulton Avenue, beginning near Arc Way and extending north approximately 180 feet past Shasta Way.

3. All landscaping improvements (planting and irrigation) within the center roadway median on Goodwin Drive, beginning at Dexter Way and extending north approximately 300 feet.

4. All surface and underground improvements (planting, irrigation, landscape maintenance, groundcover and mulch, perimeter wall and pilasters, and sidewalk) contained within LOT A, and/or along Goodwin Drive.

5. The perimeter masonry wall which runs along Lots 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, and Lot B.

6. The sliding electronic gate where Dexter Way meets the perimeter CMU Wall.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 3
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
SECTION III – METHOD OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The basic objective of the Assessment Spread is to distribute costs and levy assessments in accordance with the special benefits the properties within the District will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District’s improvements and facilities.

All parcels within the Meadowood Landscape District will be assessed equally to cover the estimated maintenance costs for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. Parcels owned or operated by governmental entities are exempt from these assessments.

The total assessment to be apportioned among the benefiting parcels is based on the District’s estimated costs, as detailed in Section IV – District Budget. Assessments will commence following formal acceptance of the improvements by the Ripon City Council and the official establishment of the District.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 4
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
SECTION IV – DISTRICT BUDGET
This section provides a summary of the District’s estimated expenditures and revenues for Fiscal Year 2026–27. It identifies the annual costs associated with maintaining and servicing District improvements, which provide a special benefit to properties within the District. These total costs form the basis of the assessments apportioned to parcels in accordance with the methodology described in Section III.

In accordance with the Assessment Adjustment Formula approved by the property owner(s) at the time of the District’s formation, this Engineer’s Report includes the calculations for the proposed adjustment to the Maximum Allowable Assessment for Fiscal Year 2026–27. It is recognized that the cost of maintaining and operating District improvements increases over time as a result of inflation and changes in utility costs.

Accordingly, the Maximum Allowable Assessment for each fiscal year shall be adjusted annually by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the San Francisco–Oakland–Hayward Consumer Price Index (CPI), plus any actual increase in the cost of utilities, including water and electricity.

Each fiscal year, the City shall identify the annual percentage change in the CPI between June of the current fiscal year and June of the prior fiscal year. In the event the Bureau of Labor Statistics revises or discontinues this index, the City shall utilize the revised index or a comparable index, as approved by the City Council, to measure fluctuations in the cost of living.

Following the close of each fiscal year, the District’s maintenance and operating costs shall be reviewed and updated for the upcoming fiscal year. The Maximum Allowable Assessment shall be adjusted accordingly, and this process shall be repeated annually for the duration of the District.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 5
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
Estimate of Cost of Improvements
Direct Costs
Utilities $2,500.00
Landscape Maintenance $36,000.00
Fuel $100.00
Equipment & Tools $100.00
Labor $2,500.00
Total Direct Costs $41,200.00
Incidental Costs
City Administrative Costs $6,250.00
Engineering Costs $250.00
Legal Costs $200.00
Publishing Legal Notices $100.00
SJ County Auditor $400.00
Total Incidental Costs $7,200.00
Estimate of Costs
Total Estimated Costs $48,400.00
District Statistics
Total Parcels 100
Total Parcels Levied 88
Proposed Levy per Parcel $550.00
Maximum % increase per Parcel * 0.0%
Total Assessment Levy $48,400.00
Fund Balance Information
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance at 7/1/26 $0
Estimated Net Revenue $0
City of Ripon General Fund Transfer $0
Estimated Ending Fund Balance at 6/30/27 $0
Meadowood - District No. 26-1
The landscaping, irrigation system, walls, misc. structures, sidewalk, fencing and miscellaneous amenities will be maintained by City of Ripon personnel or approved consultant. The City estimates that the cost to perform maintenance within the Meadowood Assessment District for FY 26-27 will amount to $48,400.00. Some of the items included are: water for plants and trees, electricity, weeding, pruning, replacement of trees and plants, wall/structure, sidewalk, maintenance and repair, graffiti removal, and to maintain and replace, if necessary, irrigation controller, fencing, sprinkler lines and sprinkler heads. The above listed items may not be all inclusive. *Established formula with the establishment of the District for increasing assessments for future fiscal years to offset increases in cost due to inflation. The maximum assessment amount allowed for each fiscal year shall be increased in an amount equal to the annual percentage increase of the local San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Consumer Price Index, plus any actual increase in the cost of utilities (water and electricity). Each fiscal year, the City shall identify the annual percentage difference in the Index between June of the current fiscal year and that of the previous June. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the City shall use the revised index or comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living.

FY26/27 Full assessment $550.00/lot ($48,400.00) District Established

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 6
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
SECTION V – CERTIFICATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ripon, San Joaquin County, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, adopted a Resolution ordering the undersigned Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report for the formation of a street lighting and landscape district for the maintenance of public improvements; and WHERAS, as required by said Act, the undersigned was directed to include in the report a general description of the plans and specifications, an estimate of costs, a diagram of the District, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements upon all assessable parcels within the District, to which Resolution and the description of the improvements therein contained reference is hereby made for further particulars.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of said City, hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses of the maintenance and servicing of said improvements upon the parcels and lots of land within the District, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot, from the improvements, and more particularly set forth in Section IV– District Budget of this Report and by reference made a part hereof.

The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by City Council. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

DATED: April 14, 2026
BY:

Kevin Werner, P.E.

City Administrator / City Engineer
R.C.E. No. C64107

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 7
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
APPENDIX A – ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND FINAL MAP
For general reference purposes and as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, renderings of the District boundaries, showing the extent of the assessable parcels, are presented herein. The unique identifier for each parcel or lot within the District is its Assessor’s Parcel Number, as shown on the Assessment Roll. More detailed District diagrams are on file with the City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page |
8 Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
Meadowood #26-1 – Assessment Diagram

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 9
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 10
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 11
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 12
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 13
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 14
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance Page | 15
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
An Assessment Roll (a listing of all parcels proposed to be assessed within the District and the amount of their assessment) has been filed with the City Clerk and is included on the following pages.

The Assessment Roll reflects all properties currently identified within the District and their proposed assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2026/2027. Each lot or parcel listed on the assessment roll is currently shown and illustrated on the San Joaquin County Assessor's roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels.

All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County securing the roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2026/2027.

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 16
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
APN District Assessment
261750010000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750020000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750030000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750040000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750050000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750060000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750070000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750080000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750090000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760010000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760020000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760030000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760040000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760050000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760060000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760070000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760080000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760090000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760100000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760110000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760120000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760130000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760140000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760150000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760160000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760170000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760180000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760190000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760200000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760210000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760220000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750100000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750110000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750120000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750130000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750140000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750150000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750160000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750170000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 17
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
261750180000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750190000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750200000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760230000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760240000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760250000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760260000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760270000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760280000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760290000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760300000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760310000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760320000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760330000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760340000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760350000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760360000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760370000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760380000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760390000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760400000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760410000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760420000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760430000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760440000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760450000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750210000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750220000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750230000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750240000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750250000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750260000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750270000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750280000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750290000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750300000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750310000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750320000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750330000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750340000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750350000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750360000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750370000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) Page | 18
Meadowood Assessment District
FY 2026/27 Engineer’s Report
261750380000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750390000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750400000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750410000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750420000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261750430000 Meadowood 26-1 $550.00
261760460000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261760470000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261760480000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750440000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750450000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261760490000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750460000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750470000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750480000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750490000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261750500000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
261760500000 Meadowood 26-1 $0.00
TOTALS $48,400.00

1.3.A.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Engineer's Report_Meadowood FY26-27 (26-12 : Meadowood Landscape Maintenance District - 2nd Formation Resolution) City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Jane Kilgore, Deputy City Clerk
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: SJCOG Annual Financial Plan
This resolution accepts the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ annual financial plan that describes the proposed transportation planning activities for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Attachments:

1. 2026 SJCOG AFP

1.3.B
Packet Pg. 71
RESOLUTION NO. 26-13

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RIPON ACCEPTING THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF
GOVERNMENTS’ ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2026-2027 ADOPTED BY THE SJCOG BOARD ON
MARCH 26, 2026
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ Annual Financial Plan for fiscal year 2026-2027 was adopted by the SJCOG Board on March 26, 2026; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the SJCOG’s Joint Powers Agreement, following adoption of the budget by the SJCOG Board, it is to be delivered to member agencies for ratification by each governing body; and
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ Annual Financial Plan has been filed with the City of Ripon.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Ripon accepts the San Joaquin Council of Governments’ Annual Financial Plan for fiscal year 2026- 2027.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ripon this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

RESULT: ADOPTED BY CONSENT VOTE [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
SECONDER:Michael Restuccia, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

THE CITY OF RIPON,
A Municipal Corporation
By ________________________________
GARY BARTON, Mayor
ATTEST:

By: ___________________________
LISA ROOS, City Clerk

1.3.B
Packet Pg. 72

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
555 E. Weber Avenue • Stockton, California 95202 • P 209.235.0600 • F 209.235.0438 • www.sjcog.org Christina Fugazi
CHAIR
Gary Singh

VICE CHAIR
Diane Nguyen

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Member Agencies

CITIES OF

ESCALON,

LATHROP,
LODI,

MANTECA,

MOUNTAIN HOUSE,
RIPON,

STOCKTON,
TRACY,
AND

THE COUNTY OF SAN

JOAQUIN
March 31, 2026
Kevin Werner
City of Ripon
259 N Wilma Ave
Ripon, CA 95366
Dear Mr. Werner,
On March 26, 2026 the San Joaquin Council of Government (SJCOG) Board adopted the Annual Financial Plan for FY 2026-27. Attached is the board staff report as well as a copy of the adopting resolution. Pursuant to SJCOG's Joint Powers Agreement, following adoption of the budget by the SJCOG Board, it is to be delivered to member agencies for ratification by each governing body.

Approval by a majority of the governing bodies representing 55% or more of the county's population is considered ratification.

Therefore, SJCOG requests you place SJCOG's Annual Financial Plan for FY 2026-27 on a forthcoming consent agenda prior to June 30, 2026, for ratification.

The Annual Financial Plan implements the FY 2026-27 Overall Work Program (OWP) that was also adopted by the SJCOG Board on March 26, 2026.

The attached excerpt of the Annual Financial Plan (AFP) provides a summary of revenues and expenditures by cost category and line item comparing the approved FY 2026-27 budgets with the current year (FY 2025-26) adopted budget, as most recently amended, along with FY 2024-25 actual expenditures.

Revenues and expenditures total $47,315,919. The approved AFP represents the general fund budget for SJCOG. The revenues and expenditures in the AFP are the same as the Overall Work Program (OWP), however, presented in a traditional line-item format compared to the work element format of the OWP.

Readers should note several differences between SJCOG and its member agencies’ budgets:
• SJCOG revenue sources are quite different from our member agencies. • SJCOG employs staff on an at-will basis, vis-à-vis civil service and has its own employee handbook and policies.
• SJCOG has its own Financial and Accounting Policy guiding our financial matters including procurement procedures.
• SJCOG employees are exempted from Social Security except for Medicare.
• As noted below, SJCOG offers a defined contribution retirement plan to its employees. SJCOG has no CalPERS or post employments benefit obligations except limited sick leave conversion as noted.

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) The following assumptions are incorporated in the budget:

1. Work will not begin, and expenses will not be incurred unless anticipated revenue sources are secured.

2. The AFP anticipates SJCOG to be fully staffed. The budget includes a

7.50 % pool that can be drawn upon for merit-based increases and potential promotions. The full impact of that pool is incorporated into the salary-driven benefits (retirement, Medicare, disability).

3. SJCOG has no significant liability exposure for post-employment benefits. a. The employee retirement program is a defined contribution program managed by the International City Managers Association
Retirement Program (Mission Square Retirement).
b. SJCOG employee vacation accruals are capped at two times the individual’s annual leave.
c. Upon separation with 50 years of age or 20 years of SJCOG employment, an employee can convert accrued sick leave hours to be deposited into a Retirement Health Savings Account to pay for health-related expenses. The conversion is based upon the employee’s salary at retirement.

SJCOG staff would be pleased to appear before your policymakers to answer any questions they might have regarding this matter. We request ratification prior to June 30, 2026. Please let me know when this will be on your agenda.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, don't hesitate to contact me at (209) 235-0454.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

GRACE OROSCO
Deputy Director of Finance & Administration
Attachments:

R-26-22
FY 2026-27 Annual Financial Plan Staff Report
FY 2026-27 Annual Financial Plan Board Summary

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) Councilmember Jeremy Engle City of Escalon
Councilmember Lisa Craig City of Lodi
Mayor Paul Akinjo City of Lathrop
Mayor Andy Su City of Mountain House
Councilmember Leo Zuber City of Ripon
Councilmember Mario Enriquez City of Stockton
Councilmember Mariela Ponce City of Stockton
Mayor Dan Arriola City of Tracy
Supervisor Sonny Dhaliwal County of San Joaquin
Supervisor Steven Ding County of San Joaquin
Supervisor Robert Rickman County of San Joaquin
Grace Magsayo, Director Caltrans District 10
Derek Graves, Jr, Chair San Joaquin Regional Transit District Margaret Shea Stephens, Commissioner Port of Stockton
Mayor Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton
San Joaquin Council of Governments

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN
Fiscal Year 2026/27
CHAIR
Proposed Final March 26, 2026
Grace Orosco
Deputy Director of Finance and Administration

VICE-CHAIR
Mayor Gary Singh, City of Manteca

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

EX OFFICIO DIRECTORS
SUBMITTED BY:

Diane Nguyen
Executive Director
P. 24

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 +/- +/-
REVENUES Amendment #3 Proposed Draft Change % Change
Federal Grants 30,541,057 28,901,219 (1,639,838) -5.37% State Grants 16,847,401 8,593,012 (8,254,389) -49.00%
Local 9,625,460 9,721,688 96,228 1.00%
Interest 40,000 40,000 - 0.00%
Other 60,000 60,000 - 0.00%
SJCOG OPERATING REVENUE 57,113,918 47,315,919 (9,797,999) -17.16%

EXPENDITURES
Salaries & Benefits 7,137,261 7,137,261 - 0.00%
Services & Supplies
Office, Computer License 367,000 377,000 10,000 2.72%
Communications 60,000 60,000 - 0.00%
Memberships 45,000 45,000 - 0.00%
Maintenance - Equipment 10,000 10,000 - 0.00%
Rents & Leases - Equipment 131,000 131,000 - 0.00%
Publications & Legal Notices 7,500 7,500 - 0.00%
Insurance 278,000 303,000 25,000 8.99%
Building Operations & Maintenance 335,000 335,000 - 0.00% SJCOG Building Debt Service Principal and Interest 200,000 200,000 - 0.00% Transportation/Travel
Transportation,Travel & Training (In & Out of State) 233,000 233,000 - 0.00% Professional Services 47,859,656 38,026,657 (9,832,999) -20.55% Capital Outlay 450,500 450,500 - 0.00%
SJCOG OPERATING EXPENDITURES 57,113,918 47,315,919 (9,797,999) -17.16% San Joaquin Council of Governments

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN
Fiscal Year 2026/2027
Proposed Final March 26, 2026
P. 25

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) March 2026
SJCOG Board

STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Approval of the Fiscal Year 2026-27
Proposed Final Annual Financial Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution 2026-22, approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Final
Annual Financial Plan
The attached proposed Annual Financial Plan (AFP) provides a detailed summary of revenues and expenditures by cost category and line item. The proposal compares the Fiscal Year 2026-27 proposed budget with the most recently adopted Fiscal Year 2025- 26 AFP. In addition, it compares the proposal to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 actual expenditures. The total revenues and expenditures amount to $47,315,919. The proposed AFP represents the general fund budget for the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG). The revenues and expenditures in the AFP are the same as the Overall Work Program (OWP), however, presented in a traditional line-item format compared to the work element format of the OWP.

Below is a summary of revenues and expenditures in the AFP. For details on each of those categories please refer to the attachment.

Readers should note several differences between SJCOG and its member agencies’ budgets:
x SJCOG revenue sources are quite different from our member agencies. x SJCOG employs staff on an at-will basis, as compared to civil service for most member jurisdictions, and has its own employee handbook and policies. x SJCOG has its own Financial and Accounting Policy guiding our financial matters including procurement procedures.
x SJCOG employees are exempted from Social Security except for Medicare. x As noted below, SJCOG offers a defined contribution retirement plan to its employees. SJCOG has no CalPERS or other post-employment benefit obligations except limited sick leave conversion as noted for qualifying employees.

Upon adoption by the board, pursuant to the SJCOG Joint Powers Agreement, the AFP will be sent to the member agencies for ratification. Ratification is achieved when a majority of the member agencies, representing 55% of the county’s population, approve the AFP.

P. 20

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) The following assumptions are incorporated in the budget:

1. The budget includes a longevity incentive program to attract and maintain an experienced and knowledgeable workforce. The incentive is structured to recognize and reward the length of staff’s tenure. The longevity pay targets will be 10, 15 and 20 years (of continuous service), with an increase in base salary of 1%, 2% and 3% respectively.

This longevity pay does not apply to the contract position of the Executive Director.

2. The budget includes a COLA adjustment of 2.67 percent in the minimum and maximum salary ranges of all classifications for noncontract positions. The COLA percent is applied to noncontract employees’ salary.

3. SJCOG has no significant liability exposure for post-employment benefits. a. The employee retirement program is a defined contribution program managed by Mission Square Retirement, formerly the International City Managers Association Retirement Program, with contributions defined within the Board adopted Policy Handbook
b. SJCOG employee vacation accruals are capped at two times the individual’s annual leave, per the Board adopted Policy Handbook. c. Upon separation, an employee can convert accrued sick leave hours to be deposited into a Retirement Health Savings Account to pay for healthrelated expenses, with the qualification being 50 years of age or 20 years of SJCOG employment. The conversion is based upon the employee’s salary at retirement and alleviates SJCOG of any further liability.

REVENUES
Compared to the current year amended AFP, SJCOG general fund operating revenues are proposed to decrease from $57,113,918 to $47,315,919, which is a reduction of $9,797,999. This change primarily reflects the planned drawdown of several large multiyear grant programs that were in peak implementation during Fiscal Year 2025-26. As for SJCOG capital projects, including SR 99/120 and I-205 Managed Lanes, significant expenditures are occurring in Fiscal Year 2025/26, with phase 1A of the SR 99/120 project completing construction in the summer. As those projects advance toward completion, associated grant or project delivery expenditures naturally decline in Fiscal Year 2026-27.

P. 21

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) Federal funding for
general fund activities is
$28,901,219 which is

5.37% lower than Fiscal
Year 2025-2026. This is
primarily due to the
planned drawdown of
I-205 Managed Lanes
funds, and consumption
of FTA 5304 pass
through funds.

State funding sources are
budgeted at $8,593,012
or 49% lower primarily due to:
x $5,292,852 drawdown on REAP 2.0
x $507,429 drawdown on Regional Climate Collaborative grant. x $1,050,773 drawdown on Clean Mobility EV Bike program. x $825,508 drawdown on Clean Mobility EV Car Share program. x $344,730 drawdown on State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Planning Programming and Monitoring.
x Net drawdown of $86,790 Freeway Service Patrol funding. x $411,884 drawdown has occurred on three years of Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants offset by a Fiscal Year 2026-27 allocation of $363,600.

Local revenues are slightly higher by $96,228.

EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits remain stable at $7,137,261.

The budget includes $34,820 for longevity pay and $315,488 or 7.5% of total salaries pool for merit-based raises. The salary-driven benefits adjust accordingly.

Services and Supplies are proposed to increase by $35,000.

Liability insurance is increasing by $25,000 due to increased premiums. Office expenses are increasing by $10,000 due to increased costs for computer software and licensing.

Professional Services and Staff Augmentation will decrease by $9,832,999 from FY 2025-2026 of $47,859,656 to $38,026,657.

There is planned consumption of several multi-year grants, which directly correlate to professional services.
x The prior year’s SB-1 Sustainable Communities grants used $474,880 and we are budgeting the new SB-1 allocation of $350,000.

P. 22

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) x The I-205 Managed Lanes Widening project drew down $1,798,459 x We drew down on $1,050,773 for EV Bike Share program, and $825,508 for EV Car Share program.
x The San Joaquin Regional Climate Collaborative used $507,429 while the Regional Early Action Plan (REAP 2.0) expended $5,292,852.

Position Classification and Salary Schedule
Per board policy, the salary ranges at both the minimum and maximum levels are adjusted by the CPI change of 2.67%.

FISCAL IMPACT
The AFP assumes the continuation of currently programmed grant funding and revenue sources. The AFP is required to be adopted by the Board of Directors prior to April 1 each year and disseminated to the member agencies for ratification. The AFP is the traditional line-item budget identifying estimated revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year. The AFP is complementary to the Overall Work Program.

COMMITTEE ACTIONS:

Executive Committee — Unanimously approved the staff recommendation

RECOMMENDATION
That the Board adopt Resolution 2026-22 approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Financial Plan.

Prepared by: Grace Orosco, Deputy Director of Finance & Administration, and Lynnetta Castle, Manager of Finance P. 23

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan)

RESOLUTION

SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
R-2026-22
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2026-2027

ANNUAL FINANCIAL PLAN

FOR THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Council of Governments is required by the Joint Powers Agreement to adopt a budget (Annual Financial Plan) annually, and WHEREAS, the adopted budget is to be sent to the member agencies for ratification.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the San Joaquin Council of Governments adopts the FY 2026-2027 Annual Financial Plan and directs the Executive Director to transmit it to the member agencies for ratification.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March 2026 by the following vote of the San Joaquin Council of Governments, to wit:

AYES: Councilmember Craig-Hensley, Lodi; Supervisor Dhaliwal, SJ County; Mayor Fugazi, Stockton; Councilmember Harrison, Mountain House; Councilmember Ponce, Stockton; Supervisor Rickman, SJ County; Councilmember Zuber, Ripon NOES:

ABSENT: Mayor Akinjo, Lathrop; Mayor Arriola, Tracy; Supervisor Ding, SJ County; Councilmember Engle, Escalon; Councilmember Enriquez, Stockton; Mayor Singh, Manteca

1.3.B.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: 2026 SJCOG AFP (26-13 : SJCOG Annual Financial Plan) City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: James Pease, Public Works Director
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement with T. Mitchell Engineering & Associates to prepare design drawings for upgrades to the compressed natural gas components of the Ripon Fueling Station in the not to exceed amount of $99,330 (funding source: CNG/Fueling Station Maintenance Reserve Fund).

BACKGROUND:

The City of Ripon currently owns and operates the Ripon Fueling Station, which is located adjacent to the new Fleet Maintenance Facility on Doak Boulevard. The Station was originally constructed in 2006 and was primarily intended to serve the needs of the City’s current natural gas-powered vehicles although it is configured for diesel and gasoline fuel as well.

The majority of the City solid waste disposal trucks, sweepers and transit buses are natural gaspowered vehicles. Significant portions of the compressed natural gas system at the fueling station are nearing the end of their useful life and are in need of replacement. In addition, it is desired to transition this facility from its existing high pressure gas service feed to a lower pressure distribution pipeline which is the industry standard for modern natural gas facilities.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

This project is intended to improve the existing CNG fueling system through the removal and replacement of the existing compressor(s) and gas dryer, installation of a new low-pressure gas service to serve the new compressors, and other improvements needed to complete the system in order to extend the life of the existing CNG fueling system.

Staff received a proposal from the original Ripon Fueling Station design firm T. Mitchell Engineering & Associates to provide the necessary engineering services for the system upgrade, including design preparation and construction oversight. The attached Professional Services

1.4.A
Packet Pg. 82
Agreement details the full scope of services to be provided by T. Mitchell Engineering & Associates.

The final design bid package is anticipated to be complete in approximately 5-7 months.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The unit price of CNG fuel sold at the fueling station is set to recover the operational costs of delivering natural gas, as well as to fund future capital replacement. The attached Professional Services Agreement with T. Mitchell Engineering & Associates in the not to exceed amount of $99,330 will be funded through the CNG Station Capital Fund. The current balance in the CNG/Fueling Station Maintenance Reserve Fund is $360,000.

Attachments:

1. T Mitchell Eng. PSA

1.4.A
Packet Pg. 83
Professional Services Agreement - Page 1 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RIPON AND
T. MITCHELL ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES
This Agreement for Professional Services (“Agreement”) is entered into on, April 14, 2026 (the “Effective Date”) between the City of Ripon, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and T.

Mitchell Engineers & Associates (“Consultant”), (together sometimes referred to as the “Parties”).

Section 1. SERVICES. In accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Consultant agrees to perform all services described in the Consultant’s Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A. In the event of a conflict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and said scope of services, this Agreement shall prevail.

1.1 Term of Services. This Agreement shall begin upon signature by all Parties and shall end when Consultant completes the work described in said scope of work, or no later than two (2) years from the date this Agreement was signed by City, whichever is longer, unless the term of the Agreement is otherwise terminated or modified, as provided for herein.

1.2 Standard of Performance. Consultant shall diligently perform all services required in connection with this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which Consultant practices its profession.

1.3 Assignment of Personnel. Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services in connection with this Agreement.

1.4 Termination. City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notification to Consultant. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services satisfactorily completed as of the date that written notice of termination is received by consultant; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City documents and records identified in Section 8.1 of this Agreement.

Section 2. COMPENSATION.

City hereby agrees to pay Consultant an amount NOT TO EXCEED Ninety Nine Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Dollars ($99,330) for all work described within the Cost Proposal set forth in Exhibit A and made a part of this Agreement.

2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices as necessary during the term of this Agreement, based on the cost for services performed and reimbursable costs incurred prior to the invoice date.

2.2 Payment. City shall make monthly payments, based on invoices received, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred.

2.3 Payment of Taxes. Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 2 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates
Section 3. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall procure the types and amounts of insurance listed below for the period covered by the Agreement. (Rev 3/18)

3.1 General Liability. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, two million dollars ($2,000,000) general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability.

Consultant’s general liability policies shall be primary and non-contributory, and be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies. For construction contracts, an endorsement providing completed operations to the additional insured, ISO form CG 20 37, is also required.

3.2 Workers’ Compensation. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) if Consultant has employees. Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

3.3 Auto Liability. Consultant shall provide auto liability coverage for owned, nonowned, and hired autos using ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01, or the exact equivalent, with a limit of no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be met through a nonowned auto endorsement to the CGL policy.

3.4 Professional Liability. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that insures against professional errors and omissions that may be made in performing the Services to be rendered in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this agreement, and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three years after completion of the services required by this agreement.

3.5 All Policies Requirements.

3.5.1 Verification of Coverage. Prior to beginning any work under this Agreement, Consultant shall, at the sole option of the City, provide City with (1) certified Certification of Insurance that demonstrates compliance with all applicable insurance provisions contained herein or (2) certified policy endorsements to the general liability policy adding the City of Ripon as an Additional Insured and declaring such insurance primary in regard to work performed pursuant to this Agreement.

3.5.2 Notice of Reduction in or Cancellation of Coverage. A copy of the cancellation provisions must be attached to all insurance obtained in accordance with this Agreement.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 3 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates
Section 4. INDEMNIFICATION AND CONSULTANT’S RESPONSIBILITIES. (Rev 3/18)

4.1 Indemnity for Professional Liability: When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, and employees from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses, including reasonable legal counsel’s fees and costs but only to the extent the Consultant (and its Subconsultants), are responsible for such damages, liabilities and costs on a comparative basis of fault between the Consultant (and its Subconsultants) and the City in the performance of professional services under this agreement.

4.2 Indemnity for Other Than Professional Liability: Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, and officials from and against any liability (including liability for actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs, including reasonable legal counsel’s fees and costs, court costs, interest, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, the negligent performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or City for which Consultant is legally liable, including, but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Consultant.

Section 5. STATUS OF CONSULTANT.

5.1 Independent Contractor. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall be an independent Contractor and shall not be an employee of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent.

Section 6. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.

6.1 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement.

6.2 Compliance with Applicable Laws. Consultant and any sub-Consultants shall comply with all laws applicable to the performance of the work in connection with this Agreement.

6.3 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any sub-Consultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature, that are legally required to practice their respective professions

6.4 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. In compliance with federal, state and local laws, Consultant shall not discriminate, on the basis of a person’s race, religion, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation, against any employee, applicant for employment, sub-Consultant, bidder for a subcontract, or participant in, recipient of, or applicant for any services or programs provided by Consultant under this Agreement.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 4 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates

6.5 Work Requiring Payment of Prevailing Wages. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1771, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which these services are to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work fixed as provided in the California Labor Code shall be paid to all workers engaged in performing the services under this Agreement.

Section 7. MODIFICATION.

7.1 Amendments. The Parties may amend this Agreement only by a writing signed by all the Parties.

7.2 Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant may not assign this Agreement or any interest therein without the prior written approval of the City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the performance contemplated and provided for herein, other than to the sub-Consultants noted in the proposal, without prior written approval of the City.

7.3 Survival. All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating liability between City and Consultant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

7.4 Options upon Breach by Consultant. If Consultant materially breaches any of the terms of this Agreement, City’s remedies shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

7.4.1 Immediately terminate the Agreement;

7.4.2 Retain the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any other work product prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Agreement;

7.4.3 Retain a different Consultant to complete the work described in said scope of work not finished by Consultant; or

7.4.4 Charge Consultant for City's excess cost of completion of the unfinished work described in Exhibit A, if any. City's excess costs shall be reimbursed by Consultant where City's reasonable cost of completion paid to another qualified new consultant exceeds the amount City would have paid to Consultant pursuant to Section 2 absent the material breach; provided, however that any such excess cost reimbursement shall not exceed 25% of Consultant's quoted price for any unfinished task. Thus, by way of example, if following a material breach by Consultant a specific task which is budgeted at $10,000 has not commenced or adequately completed, and City must retain another new qualified consultant to complete that specific task, Consultant would be responsible to reimburse City in the amount of up to $2,500 (25% of the Consultant’s $10,000 quoted price for the subject task). By way of further example if the Consultant’s cost of completion of that specific task is $14,000, Consultant would be responsible to reimburse City in the amount of up to $3,500 (25% of the Consultant’s $14,000 quoted price for the subject task)

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 5 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates
Section 8. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS.

8.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant’s Performance. Upon full payment of all monies owed to the Consultant under this Agreement, all reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, (hereinafter “Work Product”) that Consultant prepares or obtains in accordance with this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered under the terms of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. This clause does not include instruments of service.

8.2 Consultant’s Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain any and all records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services or expenditures and disbursements charged to the City under this Agreement for a minimum of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to the Consultant to this Agreement.

8.3 Confidential Information and Disclosure. During the term of this Agreement, either party (the "Disclosing Party") may disclose confidential, proprietary or trade secret information (the "Information"), to the other party (the "Receiving Party"). The Receiving Party shall hold the Disclosing Party's Information in confidence and shall take all reasonable steps to prevent any unauthorized possession, use, copying, transfer or disclosure of such Information. Consultant understands that the City is a public entity and is subject to the laws that may compel it to disclose information about Consultant’s business. The restrictions on the use and disclosure of the confidential information shall not apply to information which (a) was known to the Consultant before receipt of same from the City; or (b) becomes publicly known other than through the Consultant; or (c) is disclosed pursuant to the requirements of a governmental authority or judicial order, but only to the extent required to comply with the said requirements of the government authority or judicial order.

Section 9 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.

9.1 Attorneys’ Fees. If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.

9.2 Venue. In the event that either party brings any action against the other under this Agreement, the Parties agree that trial of such action shall be vested exclusively in the state courts of California in the County of San Joaquin or in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

9.3 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged shall remain in full force and effect.

9.4 No Implied Waiver of Breach. The waiver of any breach of a specific provision of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any other breach of that term or any other term of this Agreement.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 6 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates

9.5 Contract Administration. This Agreement shall be administered by Kevin Werner, who shall act as the City’s representative. All correspondence shall be directed to or through the representative.

9.6 Notices.

Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:

Thomas D. Mitchell, PE
14256 Doolittle Dr.

San Leandro, CA 94577
Any written notice to the City shall be sent to:

Mr. Kevin Werner, PE
City Administrator/City Engineer
City of Ripon
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366

9.7 Integration; Incorporation. This Agreement, including all the exhibits attached hereto, represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. All Exhibits attached hereto are incorporated by reference herein.

9.8 Alternative Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises between the Parties that cannot be settled after engaging in good faith negotiations, City and Consultant agree to resolve the dispute in accordance with the following:

Each party will designate a senior management or executive level representative to negotiate the dispute. Through good faith negotiations, the representatives will attempt to resolve the dispute by any means within their authority. If dispute remains unresolved after fifteen (15) days of good faith negotiations, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement by mediation through a disinterested third person as mediator selected by both Parties. Mediation will begin within thirty (30) days of the selection of this disinterested third party, and will end fifteen (15) days after commencement. The Parties shall equally bear the costs of any third party in any alternative dispute resolution process.

The alternative dispute resolution process is a material condition to this Agreement and must be exhausted as an administrative remedy prior to either party initiating legal action. This alternative dispute resolution process is not intended to nor shall be construed to change the time periods for filing a claim or action specified by Government Code Section 900, et. seq.

9.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.

Neither the City nor the Consultant shall be liable to the other or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising out of or connected to this Agreement or the performance of the services on this Project.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) Professional Services Agreement - Page 7 of 7
Fueling Station System Upgrade
T. Mitchell Engineers & Associates
The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date signed by the City.

CITY OF RIPON CONSULTANT
Gary Barton, Mayor Thomas D. Mitchell, PE
Attest:

Lisa Roos, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:

Thomas H. Terpstra Jr., City Attorney

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) TME Proposal 2603
February 2, 2026
T.MITCHELL ENGINEERS &

ASSOCIATES
14256 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577 ꞏ Ph: 510-777-0520 ꞏ Fax: 510-777-0521 Mr James Pease – Dir. Public Works
City of Ripon
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
Subject: Proposal to Provide Engineering Design and Construction Admin Services City of Ripon – Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Fueling System Upgrade City of Ripon CNG Facility – 240 Doak Blvd. - Ripon, California Dear James:

I am pleased to present this proposal to provide professional engineering services to you and the City of Ripon to prepare design drawings and technical specifications suitable for plan-check, bid, and construction of CNG fueling system upgrades needed to accommodate a change in utility gas supply pressure as well as to bring the system up to current standards. The specifics of our proposal are as follows:

Project Understanding
The City of Ripon currently owns and operates a CNG fueling system which is located adjacent to the Cities Fleet Maintenance Facility on Doak Boulevard, in Ripon, California. The system is primarily intended to serve the needs of the Cities current natural gas-powered vehicles. But, is configured to allow others to fuel as well.

Though the existing system is still in use, significant portions of the existing system nearing the end of their useful life and are due for replacement. In addition, it is desired to transition this facility from its existing gas service – which comes off a nearby high pressure transmission gas line – to a lower pressure distribution pipe line.

This project is intended to improve the existing CNG fueling system by removal and replacement of the existing compressor(s) and gas dryer, installation of a new low pressure gas service to serve the new compressors, and other improvements needed to complete the system and to effectively extend the useful life of the existing CNG fueling system.

Base Scope of Work
Based upon our understanding of the projects, our proposed scope of work will include the mechanical (piping) and civil portions of the subject project (electrical will be by others):

Task 1: Preliminary Design

EXHIBIT - A

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) City of Ripon
February 2, 2026
14256 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577 ꞏ Ph: 510-777-0520 ꞏ Fax: 510-777-0521 Work with the City to help develop overall project requirements and expectations. Develop preliminary/conceptual design drawings to the extent necessary to confirm pertinent project criteria to be incorporated into the project.

Task 2: Design Development
Using the approved conceptual plan developed in Task 1, prepare detailed design drawings, calculations and technical specifications as necessary to describe the proposed project in sufficient detail to allow for internal plan check by the City and bidding of the work. Design will address necessary civil/structural and piping, and electrical systems associated with the project.

Task 3: Construction Documents
Perform minor modifications to the Bid Documents as needed to incorporate additional information gathered as part of the bidding and permit (plan check) process.

Task 4: Course of Construction Assistance
Address relevant questions or concerns received regarding the design intent.

Review contractor and vendor submittals required by the design for conformance with the design. Provide drawing/design clarification when needed to help facilitate the work.

Task 5: Record Drawings
Prepare final record drawings (“As-Builts”) based upon available information and contractors redlined construction drawings. Record drawings will be furnished electronically in pdf format. If drawings are required in AutoCAD format, they will be provided only upon execution of a mutually agreeable release and receipt of payment in full for all work performed.

Additional Work
Work considered outside of our Base Scope, but which can be performed upon request  Site surveys, geotechnical or environmental work (as an existing system, this should be unnecessary).
 Design of fire suppression systems (fire suppression systems are not normally required for CNG systems of this size).
 Construction, construction surveillance, management or coordination of any kind.  Work not directly related to and required for confirmation of proper installation of the proposed CNG equipment.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) City of Ripon
February 2, 2026
14256 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577 ꞏ Ph: 510-777-0520 ꞏ Fax: 510-777-0521 Clarifications and Assumptions
Our proposal is based upon the following assumptions, which, if incorrect may impact the proposed schedule and budget for this project:

1. Original work was done substantially in accordance with the original design drawings and Record Prints (original design was prepared by Thomas Mitchell).

2. Schedule is dependent upon timely receipt of requested information which may required to complete the design and timely review of progress and response to questions by the City, equipment providers, local authorities, and utility companies.

3. Application for, coordination of, and payment of all necessary permits and utilities or utility upgrades (gas, electric and phone) will be performed by the City.

4. Significant additional work or supporting documentation required to gain approval from governing agencies or city departments, beyond those addressed above, is outside our proposed scope of work and will be treated as extra work.

5. Only minor civil site work is anticipated and included in our scope. If detailed site plans are required, this work will be treated as an additional cost.

6. An allowance for two site visits/meetings during the design phase (pre-design and 90% design review) and up to 5 visits during the construction phase have been included in the above scope of work.

Schedule
Design work (tasks 1 and 2) will be scheduled to start immediately upon receipt of your written authorization to proceed and for substantial completion of within 10 weeks. The remainder of the work is dependent upon the schedule of others and will be completed accordingly.

Remuneration
We propose to perform the above-described scope for a Not to Exceed Amount of $99,330.

Terms
The above will be invoiced as follows:

Preliminary Design $18,920
Detailed Design $56,760
Plan Check and Bidding $9,460
Completion of Const $9,460
Project Close Out $4,730
This proposal valid for 30 days.

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) City of Ripon
February 2, 2026

14256 Doolittle Drive, San Leandro, CA 94577 ꞏ Ph: 510-777-0520 ꞏ Fax: 510-777-0521 Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We look forward to being of service.

Sincerely,
T. Mitchell Engineers, Inc.

By: Tom Mitchell
Thomas D. Mitchell, P.E.

Principal
File:p2603 city of ripon - cng update - rev 02022026

1.4.A.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: T Mitchell Eng. PSA (4970 : Professional Services Agreement - T. Mitchell Engineering) City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Lisa Roos, City Clerk & Finance Director
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Claim - Alejandro Morales
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

The City’s claim adjustor has investigated the submitted claim and is recommending the City Council reject the claim.

BACKGROUND:

Individuals who believe a municipality such as the City of Ripon is responsible for a loss that they have experienced may file a claim with that municipality. The City Clerk is responsible to process any claim received in a manner that is consistent with the Government Code. The following summarizes how a typical claim is processed:

1. City Clerk reviews the claim to determine if the claim submitted is complete. If it is found to be complete, the claim is forwarded to the City’s claims adjustor for processing. If the claim is determined not to be complete, the City Clerk returns to the individual as incomplete.

2. The City of Ripon is a member of the Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Association (CSJVRMA), which consists of 54 cities in the Central Valley that selfinsure liability losses through a pool. The CSJVRMA claims adjustor reviews all liability claims for the facts of the incident including videos, police report, interviews all individuals involved in the incident, etc. The adjustor will also review applicable local, state and federal laws to determine the City’s liability in the incident.

3. If the claims adjustor finds the City is responsible for the damages filed in the claim, he or she will submit those findings to the City Clerk for processing. If the amount of damages is less than $5,000, the City Administrator has the authority to approve the payment of the damage. If the amount of damages is greater than $5,000, the City Clerk will place on the City Council agenda for approval to pay the claim.

1.4.B
Packet Pg. 95

4. If the claims adjustor finds the City is not responsible for the damages filed in the claim, he or she will submit those findings to the City Clerk and recommend the City Council reject the claim.

5. If the claim is rejected by the City Council, the City Clerk sends a “notice of rejection” to the claimant, which advises the claimant they have six months to file a court action.

6. After the claimant has been paid or 6 months has passed since the rejection, the City’s claim adjuster issues a “closing report” to staff and staff closes the claim and files it.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Alejandro Andres Morales submitted a claim to the City of Ripon on February 11, 2026 for alleged injuries and civil rights violation due to being arrested for domestic violence. The amount of the claim is an unlimited case (excess of $25,000).

The CSJVRMA claims adjustor has reviewed the claim submitted and the Ripon Police Department report from that incident. Public entities and the individual officers are immune from liability since they are undertaking a legal action in the interests of the public.

Accordingly, it is the claims adjustor’s recommendation that this matter be submitted to the City Council for the claim to be rejected.

1.4.B
Packet Pg. 96
City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: James Pease, Public Works Director
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Nestle USA, Inc. Access Agreement
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Access Agreement with Nestle USA, Inc. to install a groundwater monitoring well on City property (City Hall) under direction and oversight from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Water Board”).

BACKGROUND:

For more than 30 years, Nestle USA, Inc. has been working under the direction of the Water Board to monitor Ripon’s groundwater and remediate the compounds associated with the decaffeinated coffee production - Trichloroethylene (TCE) and its breakdown product known as cis-1,2-Dichlorethylene (cis 1,2 DCE) - at the now closed Nestle facility that was located on Industrial Avenue.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The Water Board is requiring Nestle USA, Inc to install a monitoring well on City Hall property that will provide data regarding the movement of TCE and cis1,2 DCE in the groundwater near Municipal Well 10. This data will be used by Nestle USA, Inc and the Water Board to evaluate the effectiveness of current remediation facilities that are operating to protect Ripon’s drinking water.

Working with Nestle USA, Inc. staff has identified the location for the monitoring well in the landscaping strip located near Wilma Avenue. There will be no above ground facilities associated with this monitoring well.

The attached Access Agreement with Nestle USA, Inc. defines terms for the installation of the monitoring well, including:
 Term: Access Agreement shall be in place while the Water Board is requiring Nestle USA, Inc to have the monitoring well installed to collect data.

1.4.C
Packet Pg. 97
 Decommissioning: Nestle USA, Inc. to decommission the monitoring well pursuant to State of California well standards. Additionally, Nestle USA, Inc. will restore surface conditions consistent with the surrounding landscape and/or hardscape after the well is decommissioned.
 Nestle USA, Inc to provide the appropriate insurance as recommended by the City’s risk management pool
FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

Attachments:

1. Nestle Access Agreement 4-14-26

1.4.C
Packet Pg. 98

ACCESS AGREEMENT
This Access Agreement (“Access Agreement”) is entered into on this 14th day of April 2026 (the “Execution Date”), by and between Nestlé USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Nestlé”) and the City of Ripon (“City”).

RECITALS
The following recitals are hereby incorporated into this agreement and made a part hereof:

WHEREAS, CITY owns the real property located at 259 North Wilma Avenue in Ripon, California, consisting of approximately 4 acres and which houses the Ripon City Hall and Police Department; and
WHEREAS, Nestlé is conducting certain work which includes, without limitation, investigation, monitoring and remediation in the vicinity of the Property under the oversight of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Water Board”) and work related thereto (the “Work”); and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Work will benefit the City, Nestlé, and owners of property in the vicinity of the Property and the City desires to have the Work occur; and WHEREAS, in order to complete the Work, it will be necessary for Nestlé and its consultants and contractors to, at a minimum, conduct the following activities (collectively, the “Activities”): site preparation (marking locations and performing utility clearance), soil borings, monitoring well installation, monitoring well development and surveying, groundwater sampling, monitoring well decommissioning, borehole sealing and surface restoration at the location shown in the attached Figure 1. It is estimated that the work can be completed within 5 to 10 working days and that groundwater sampling of any wells would be performed on a quarterly basis thereafter, until the Water Board allows for the wells to be removed. The timeframe for monitoring is not currently defined and may exceed 10 years; and WHEREAS, each monitoring well will be completed inside a metal well box with a secure, traffic-rated lid, set in concrete that is nearly flush to ground surface but slightly raised and sloped to avoid ponding of rainwater. The surface completion will be secured with bolts and the monitoring well will be fitted with a locked cap to prevent tampering; and WHEREAS, Nestlé will remove the monitoring well by decommissioning in accordance with State of California well standards after the Water Board allows for the wells to be removed, or the City requires the well to be removed for other reasons. Nestlé will remove the monitoring well completion during decommissioning and will restore surface conditions to match surrounding landscape and/or hardscape as appropriate after the well is decommissioned.

1.4.C.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Nestle Access Agreement 4-14-26 (5038 : Nestle USA, Inc. Access Agreement) NOW, THEREFORE, the City and Nestlé agree as follows:

1. License. The City hereby grants Nestlé a non-exclusive temporary license, and not a grant of easement or any other interest in the Property, to enter and access the Property, including ingress and egress to perform the Activities on the Property. Nestlé shall exercise reasonable efforts to conduct the Activities with minimum disturbance to the City and upon completion of the Activities shall return the Property to the City in substantially the same condition that existed as when Nestlé entered the Property. All Activities performed by Nestlé, or the repair of any damage or the loss of production to the Property as a result of such Activities, shall be at Nestlé’s expense.

2. Notifications. Nestlé or its Consultant shall provide notification, which may be oral or by electronic mail, to the City ten (10) business days’ prior to conducting the Work, including for routine monitoring. The City shall notify Nestlé within five (5) business days of receipt of said notification as to whether Nestlé’s proposed date(s) and time(s) for the Work activities are acceptable. In the event the proposed date(s) and time(s) are unacceptable to the City, the City agrees to cooperate with Nestlé in scheduling a substitute date and time. Absence of a response from the City to Nestlé’s notification will be construed as acceptance of the City to the proposed date(s) and time(s) of the Work activities.

3. Term. This Access Agreement shall continue and shall not be revocable for so long as Nestlé is performing the Activities authorized by the Water Board (or activities related thereto). The parties agree that it would be inequitable to revoke or terminate this Access Agreement before the Work is completed.

4. Decommissioning. Upon the conclusion of Nestle's obligations to conduct the Activities or the Work, Nestle agrees to decommission and remove any monitoring wells or related infrastructure constructed pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with State of California well standards, but only with the approval of the agencies with jurisdiction, including the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board and upon issuance of any required approvals, including well removal permits. Nestle agrees to restore surface conditions consistent with the surrounding landscape and/or hardscape as appropriate after the well or wells are decommissioned. Nestle agrees to conduct all such removal and restoration work at its sole expense. Should Nestle fail to remove any installed infrastructure as contemplated herein, the City may remove and restore the area and invoice Nestle for its costs of removal and restoration, plus an administrative fee of 10%. Nestle shall be responsible to the City for any and all attorneys' fees and costs associated with the collection of City's expenses and fees incurred as a result of Nestle's failure to perform its decommissioning, removal, and restoration obligations under this Section.

5. Compliance with Laws. Nestlé shall conduct the Activities in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

6. Notices. Except as provided in Section 2 hereof, notices required under this Access Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given in person or sent by regular mail, overnight delivery services or e-mail to the party at its mailing address or e-mail address as set

1.4.C.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Nestle Access Agreement 4-14-26 (5038 : Nestle USA, Inc. Access Agreement) forth below or such other address as the party may later specify for that purpose by notice to the other party. Notice address as follows:

Nestlé: Nestlé USA, Inc.

Attn: Gregory Bosiljcic
30003 Bainbridge Road, Solon, Ohio 44139
[email protected]
City: City of Ripon
Attn: Kevin Werner
259 N. Wilma Ave., Ripon, CA 95366
[email protected]

7. Indemnification. Nestlé will indemnify and defend the City against all claims and demands by third parties arising out of any Activities performed on the Property by Nestlé or any agent or employee of Nestlé under this Access Agreement, except as a result of the City’s negligence or misconduct.

8. Non-Liability. Nothing in this Access Agreement shall constitute any admission that Nestlé is responsible for or liable in whole or in part for any contamination which is or shall be subsequently found in the groundwater wells on or in the proximity of the Property, nor shall Nestlé be required to assume any responsibility or liability pertaining to the contamination of any groundwater wells in proximity to the Property.

9. Insurance. At all times during the term of this Access Agreement, Nestlé shall maintain (i) Workers Compensation insurance with statutory limits, as required by the State of California, (ii) Employer’s Liability insurance with limits of no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, (iii) Commercial General Liability insurance with limits of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence covering liability for bodily injury and property damage, and (iv) Automobile Liability insurance coverage with a limit of no less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per accident. The required total minimum limits of liability may be satisfied with primary limits or any combination of primary and umbrella/excess limits.

All liability insurance policies shall name the City, its officers, directors, employees, affiliates, successors, and assigns, as additional insureds as its interest may appear on Nestlé’s liability policies. Nestlé shall provide certificates of insurance reasonably acceptable to the City upon execution of this License. Nestlé shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City that it has under the foregoing policies.

10. Governing Law. This Access Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.

11. Successors. This Access Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and the respective assigns, agents, representatives, transferees, heirs, and successors of the parties and the Property.

1.4.C.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Nestle Access Agreement 4-14-26 (5038 : Nestle USA, Inc. Access Agreement)

12. Captions. The caption headings in this Access Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be, and should not be construed as, a part of this Access Agreement.

13. Counterparts. This Access Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original instrument and all of which together shall constitute a single agreement. Signatures of the parties on this Access Agreement or any document delivered pursuant to this Access Agreement and transmitted by facsimile (or other electronic transmission including email of a PDF signature) shall be deemed to be original signatures for all purposes. At the request of a party, the parties shall confirm facsimile transmitted (or other electronic transmission including email of a PDF signature) signatures by signing an original document.

14. Warranty of Capacity to Sign Agreement. Each party warrants and represents that the individual signing this Access Agreement on its behalf has all required delegations of authority he or she needs to bind the party to this Access Agreement under law and that he or she signed this Access Agreement by his or her own free will. Each party further warrants that it is not relying upon any statement or representation made by the other party, or that party’s agents, employees, attorneys or servants, but is relying solely upon its own judgment.

IN WITNESS OF THIS ACCESS AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Access Agreement as of the Execution Date.

City:

CITY OF RIPON
By: _____________________________
Name: __________________________
Title: _____________________________
Nestlé:

NESTLÉ USA, INC.

By: ______________________________
Name: ____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Gregory Bosiljcic

1.4.C.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Nestle Access Agreement 4-14-26 (5038 : Nestle USA, Inc. Access Agreement) 259 North
Wilma Ave
Proposed
Work Area
FIGURE 1

PROPOSED WORK AREA
City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Kevin Werner, City Administrator
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Chapter 9.23
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt the ordinance amending Section 9.23 of the Municipal Code relating to General Park Rules and Regulations to:

1. Clarify the process for obtaining a park use permit;

2. Specify when violations of park rules constitute an infraction or misdemeanor; and

3. Establish protections for open space areas controlled or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes.

BACKGROUND:

Section 9.23 of the Municipal Code establishes general rules and regulations governing the use of City parks and recreational facilities. These provisions are intended to ensure safe and orderly use of public spaces while protecting public property and natural resources.

Over time, staff has identified several areas within the ordinance that would benefit from being updated. Specifically, the existing code language does not describe the process currently being used to obtain a park use permit for organized events or activities. Additionally, the current ordinance does not explicitly distinguish between violations that constitute an infraction versus those that may be prosecuted as a misdemeanor.

Staff has also identified a need to better protect certain natural areas within open space areas that are owned, controlled, or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes, including riparian habitat corridors along the river. These areas provide ecological benefits and are vulnerable to disturbance from activities such as excavation, grading, removal of vegetation, or other forms of alteration.

DISCUSSION:

The proposed amendment to Chapter 9.23 will amend this section of the Municipal Code as described below.

2.A
Packet Pg. 104
Park Use Permit Process
The proposed amendments clarify the circumstances under which individuals or organizations must obtain a park use permit prior to conducting organized activities within City parks. The ordinance establishes the roles and responsibilities between the Recreation Commission and Recreation Director in issuing a park use permit, establishing park rules, and appealing a decision by the Director.

Enforcement Provisions
The ordinance also establishes clearer enforcement language regarding violations of park rules and regulations. The amendment specifies that violations may be prosecuted as either an infraction or misdemeanor, depending on the nature and severity of the offense.

This provides clarity for enforcement of the park rules and regulations.

Protection of Undeveloped Open Space
The amendment introduces a new provision that prohibits disturbing open space areas controlled or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes. These areas may include natural habitat, riparian corridors, and other environmentally sensitive lands.

The ordinance specifically prohibits activities such as:
 Excavation, digging, trenching, grading, removing soil, or filling any area;  Removing, cutting, burning, or damaging any native vegetation;  Constructing or placing structures, fences, trails or roads;  Altering any natural stream channels or banks;
 Introducing any pollutants, debris, or materials that may harm wildlife, plants, or degrade water quality;
 Operating a motor vehicle within the Park boundaries except in specifically designated areas within the Park (e.g., paved roadways and parking lots);  Killing, chasing, wounding, harassing or capturing wild or domestic animals; and  Any other activity that may result in wildlife habitat degradation, disturbance, destruction, or erosion.

These protections are intended to preserve natural resources and prevent unauthorized modification of City-owned or controlled open space areas.

During the first reading and introduction of the ordinance, two additional changes were discussed, which have been incorporated into the ordinance, including:

2.A
Packet Pg. 105
– Reduce the timeline from 25 business days to 10 business days for the Recreation Director to approve or deny a Park Use Permit application. – Prohibit the use of personal transportation devices such as electric bikes or motorized scooters on grass areas or non-designated areas within City parks.

Following is the proposed Ordinance recommended for second reading and adoption and attached are redline changes from the first reading and labeled “Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23” FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed changes will not have a significant fiscal impact.

Attachments:

1. Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23

2.A
Packet Pg. 106
ORDINANCE NO. 935

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RIPON AMENDING CHAPTER 9.23 "GENERAL RULES FOR
CITY PARKS" OF THE RIPON MUNICIPAL CODE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIPON AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CODE. Chapter 9.23 of the Ripon Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

Chapter 9.23

GENERAL RULES FOR CITY PARKS
Sections:

9.23.010 Purpose

9.23.020 Definitions

9.23.030 Park Hours

9.23.040 Prohibited Conduct in all City Parks

9.23.045 Specified Rules by Recreation Commission Resolution

9.23.050 Activity Allowed with a Permit

9.23.060 Fees

9.23.070 Revocation of Permit

9.23.080 Advertising Within City Parks

9.23.090 Inspection and Closure of Park

9.23.110 Violation - Penalty

9.23.120 Ejection of Violators

9.23.010 Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide and ensure an enjoyable, recreational, and relaxing atmosphere within City Parks for the residents of the City of Ripon. (Ord. 883, 2019)

9.23.020 Definitions
As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the definition provided herein:

A. “Director” shall mean the City Recreation Director.

B. “Organized Sports Activities” include any use of a City park (including, but not limited to field rental, practice, training, game, tournament, contest or any other athletic activity, whether conducted by teams or otherwise, in which more than 6 persons participate, and in which the time, place, and rules for competing have been predetermined by either the participants or any other person or organization.

C. “Public Address System” shall mean the permanently mounted sound amplification equipment at any city park, including microphones, sound amplifiers, loudspeakers, and other related equipment.

D. “Golfing Activities” consist of any practice or activity involving the use of golf regulation or practice equipment.

2.A
Packet Pg. 107
E. “Park Use Permit” means that certain permit issued by the Director pursuant to which the permittee is granted the temporary exclusive use of all or a portion of a City park or facilities therein, on terms and conditions which are established by the rules approved by the Recreation Commission.

F. “Special Events” means those activities defined in Chapter 5.40.010 of this Code.

G. “Motor Vehicle” shall have the same meaning as it is defined in California Vehicle Code Section 415, or as is subsequently amended. However, anything meeting the definition of “Personal Transportation Device” as defined herein shall not be considered a “Motor Vehicle” for the purposes of this Chapter.

H. “Personal Transportation Device” shall include all of the following, as they are defined in the California Vehicle code: electrically motorized boards, motorized scooters, electric bicycles, and similar devices.

I. “City Park” or “Park” means all parks, parkways, community buildings and grounds, athletic facilities, open space areas, and other grounds and facilities owned, controlled, or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes, whether passive or active.

9.23.030 Park Hours
The operating hours for all City Parks shall be determined by resolution of the City Council, and may be amended from time to time in the same manner. Hours shall be posted in a conspicuous place within each City Park. Loitering in City Parks during closed hours is prohibited, and shall be punishable as provided in Section 9.23.110 herein.

9.23.040 Prohibited Conduct In All City Parks
The following activities are prohibited within City Parks:

A. Any person who engages in threatening, abusive or disorderly conduct or behavior within any City Park may be cited with an infraction and ordered to leave the Park.

B. Littering, soiling or defacing restrooms, or other facilities, including landscape and fixtures is prohibited and may be grounds for immediate expulsion. Such conduct may also be cited as an infraction or a misdemeanor at the discretion of the citing officer, which may or may not include the severity of the damage incurred.

C. Any person who plays or broadcasts amplified music or amplified sound without a Park Use Permit issued by the Director shall be cited with an infraction. The use of small portable radios shall be permitted so long as such radios are operated at such a volume as not to disturb other persons in the park or any residence adjoining the park.

D. Any person operating or parking a Motor Vehicle or Personal Transportation Device on any grass area, or non-designated parking area within any City Park shall be cited with an infraction.

E. All parks are declared drug, alcohol, and gang free zones. Any person found in possession of drugs, alcohol, or gang related materials, or performing any gang related activity, shall be cited with a misdemeanor. Alcoholic beverages shall only be permitted within any City Parks when a special permit allowing the consumption of alcoholic beverages has been issued by the Chief of Police, pursuant to Chapter 5.40 of this Code.

F. Any person who undertakes Golfing Activities, except within areas specifically designated for such use, shall be cited with an infraction.

G. The removal of any authorized or official sign indicating that any park facility or equipment is reserved is prohibited. Any person who uses any park facility or equipment which has been

2.A
Packet Pg. 108
reserved or which is marked by any authorized or official sign as reserved without receiving prior written permission from the Director shall be cited with an infraction.

H. Any person attempting to sell any goods or services; conduct or maintain any show, performance, concert, place of amusement or exhibition; or conduct private lessons or classes for compensation in any City Park without a valid Park Use Permit shall be cited with an infraction.

I. It shall be unlawful for any person to make or kindle a fire in any City Park, except under the following circumstances:

1. Prior permission is granted by the City in conjunction with the rental of a designated venue; or

2. Where the park is equipped with barbeque pits, a fire may be kindled in the provided pits.

J. The following activities shall be prohibited within City Parks and shall be considered a public nuisance:

1. Excavation, digging, trenching, grading, removing soil, or filling any area within a Park;

2. Removing, cutting, burning, or damaging any native vegetation within a Park;

3. Constructing or placing structures, fences, trails or roads;

4. Altering any natural stream channels or banks;

5. Introducing any pollutants, debris, or materials that may harm wildlife, plants, or degrade water quality;

6. Operating a motor vehicle within the Park boundaries except in specifically designated areas within the Park (e.g., paved roadways and parking lots);

7. Killing, chasing, wounding, harassing or capturing wild or domestic animals; and

8. Any other activity that may result in wildlife habitat degradation, disturbance, destruction, or erosion.

9.23.045 Specific Rules By Recreation Commission Resolution The Recreation Commission shall be empowered, at regular, noticed public meetings of the Commission, to enact additional rules (not in conflict with this Chapter) for specified City Parks by way of resolution. Approved resolutions shall become effective immediately upon adoption and must be retained by the City Clerk and clearly posted in a conspicuous place in the subject park. Any violation of any rule adopted by resolution of the Recreation Commission shall be cited as an infraction unless otherwise specified in this Chapter. All resolutions adopted by the Recreation Commission are subject to review by the City Council.

9.23.050 Activity Allowed with a Permit
The City Parks and facilities may be made available for the exclusive use of persons and groups for Organized Sports Activities only upon the issuance of a Park Use Permit by the Director. All City and Recreation Commission sponsored events within City Parks take precedence over any other event.

A. Organized Sports Activities: The following City Parks are available for Organized Sports Activities:

1. Stouffer Park

2. Mistlin Sports Park

3. Thiemann Athletic Park (Community Center)

4. Lan Park

5. Boesch Park

6. Skate Park

2.A
Packet Pg. 109

7. Harvest Park
Any person seeking a Park Use Permit for an Organized Sports Activity must submit an application and a processing fee in an amount established by the Recreation Commission by resolution to the Director at least thirty (30) days in advance of the date of the activity or event.

Applications for a Park Use Permit may not be made more than one year in advance of the date of the activity or event. The Director shall have ten (10) business days to approve or deny the application for a Park Use Permit and shall issue notice of the decision in writing or through electronic message. A person denied a Park Use Permit may appeal the Director’s decision to the Recreation Commission by filing a written appeal with the Director within 10 days of issuance of the Director’s decision. Decisions of the Recreation Commission made pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be final and conclusive, and shall not be subject to appeal.

Rental application, proof of insurance, rental fees and a cleaning/security deposit is required to conduct any organized activity within a City Park. The deposit may be refunded in whole or in part, if at the discretion of the Director, the facility has been left in good condition at the conclusion of the organized activity. Any refund shall be paid within thirty (30) days after the event.

All City and Recreation Commission sponsored events shall be exempt from a Park Use Permit.

B. Special Events: The following City parks are available for Special Events:

1. Stouffer Park

2. Mistlin Sports Park

3. Thiemann Athletic Park (Community Center)
The use of these parks for a special event requires a Special Event Permit pursuant to Chapter

5.40 of this Code.

9.23.060 Fees
The Recreation Commission shall, by resolution, establish and periodically update a fee schedule specifying the applicable fee(s) for the use of City parks for Organized Sports Activities pursuant to an approved Park Use Permit.

9.23.070 Revocation of Permit
A Park Use Permit may be revoked by the Director if the permittee is found to be violating any City Park rules or requirements issued by City ordinance, Recreation Commission resolution, or included as conditions to the Park Use Permit. The Director’s decision may be appealed to the Recreation Commission by submitting a written appeal to the Director within 10 days of the revocation of the permit. The Recreation Commission’s decision on an appeal made pursuant to this section shall be final and conclusive, and shall not be subject to appeal.

2.A
Packet Pg. 110
including the establishment of fees and charges for advertising space. The Director shall administer any such program, rules and procedures on behalf of the City.

9.23.090 Inspection and Closure of Park
Any section or part of a park or facility may be inspected and declared closed to the public at the direction of the City Administrator at any time and for intervals of time, either temporarily or at regular and stated intervals (daily or otherwise) for reasons including, but not limited to, the following:

A. public liability
B. damage to turf
C. public service
D. public health and safety
Such closure may be partial, so as to limit certain activities, as the City Administrator may reasonably find necessary.

9.23.110 Violation - Penalty
A. Unless otherwise specified within this Chapter, any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable as provided in Chapter 1.08 of this Code. (Ord. 883, 2019) B. In addition to the penalties authorized under this Chapter, the measure of damages and the remedy for any violation of this Section that results in an injury to Park land or facilities shall include the restoration of the Park land or facilities to its condition immediately prior to the violation or restitution payment of an amount equal to the actual cost of said restoration, including administrative costs.

C. All remedies prescribed under this Chapter shall be cumulative and the use of one or more remedies by the City shall not bar the use of any other remedy for the purpose of enforcing the provisions hereof.

9.23.120 Ejection of Violators
A. In addition to all other remedies and penalties specified in this Chapter, Director or any City Police personnel may order any person violating any provision of this Chapter to vacate the City Park in which the violation occurred until the park opens to the public the following day. Any person refusing to leave a City Park at the order of any authorized City representative may be cited with a misdemeanor.

SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). The City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this Ordinance does not constitute the approval of a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15060(c)(2) and (3), 15061(b)(3), 15262, and 15378 of the State of California CEQA Guidelines.

Specifically, this Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because it does not authorize the construction of any new structures or other physical changes to the environment.

2.A
Packet Pg. 111
SECTION 3. NO MANDATORY DUTY OF CARE. This Ordinance is not intended to, and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner that imposes upon the City or any officer, agent, employee or volunteer, thereof a mandatory duty of care towards persons and property, so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.

SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in this Chapter, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of this Chapter would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation from and after thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 6. PUBLICATION. At least five (5) days prior to its final adoption, copies of this ordinance shall be posted at City Hall and on the City of Ripon website; and a notice shall be published once in The Manteca Bulletin, the official newspaper of the City of Ripon, setting forth the title of this ordinance, the date of its introduction and the places where this ordinance is posted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Ripon this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Michael Restuccia, Council Member
SECONDER:Daniel de Graaf, Council Member
AYES: Barton, Uecker, Restuccia, Zuber, de Graaf

THE CITY OF RIPON,
A Municipal Corporation
By _______________________________
GARY BARTON, Mayor
ATTEST:

By: ___________________________
LISA ROOS, City Clerk

2.A
Packet Pg. 112
Redline Version 9.23.090
Chapter 9.23

GENERAL RULES FOR CITY PARKS
Sections:

9.23.010 Purpose

9.23.020 Definitions

9.23.030 Park Hours

9.23.040 Prohibited Conduct in all City Parks

9.23.045 Specified Rules by Recreation Commission Resolution

9.23.050 Activity Allowed with a Permit

9.23.060 Fees

9.23.070 Revocation of Permit

9.23.080 Advertising Within City Parks

9.23.090 Inspection and Closure of Park

9.23.110 Violation - Penalty

9.23.120 Ejection of Violators

9.23.010 Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide and ensure an enjoyable, recreational, and relaxing atmosphere within City Parks for the residents of the City of Ripon. (Ord. 883, 2019)

9.23.020 Definitions
As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the definition provided herein:

A. “Director” shall mean the City Recreation Director.

C. “Public Address System” shall mean the permanently mounted sound amplification equipment at any city park, including microphones, sound amplifiers, loudspeakers, and other related equipment.

D. “Golfing Activities” consist of any practice or activity involving the use of golf regulation or practice equipment.

E. “Park Use Permit” means that certain permit issued by the Director pursuant to which the permittee is granted the temporary exclusive use of all or a portion of a City park or facilities therein, on terms and conditions which are established by the rules approved by the Recreation Commission.

F. “Special Events” means those activities defined in Chapter 5.40.010 of this Code.

2.A.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23 (935 : Chapter 9.23) Redline Version 9.23.090
I. “City Park” or “Park” means all parks, parkways, community buildings and grounds, athletic facilities, open space areas, and other grounds and facilities owned, controlled, or operated by the City for park, recreation, or open space purposes, whether passive or active.

9.23.040 Prohibited Conduct In All City Parks
The following activities are prohibited within City Parks:

A. Any person who engages in threatening, abusive or disorderly conduct or behavior within any City Park may be cited with an infraction and ordered to leave the Park.

D. Any person operating or parking a Motor Vehicle or Personal Transportation Device on any grass area, or non-designated parking area within any City Park shall be cited with an infraction.

F. Any person who undertakes Golfing Activities, except within areas specifically designated for such use, shall be cited with an infraction.

G. The removal of any authorized or official sign indicating that any park facility or equipment is reserved is prohibited. Any person who uses any park facility or equipment which has been reserved or which is marked by any authorized or official sign as reserved without receiving prior written permission from the Director shall be cited with an infraction.

I. It shall be unlawful for any person to make or kindle a fire in any City Park, except under the following circumstances:

1. Prior permission is granted by the City in conjunction with the rental of a designated venue; or

2. Where the park is equipped with barbeque pits, a fire may be kindled in the provided pits.

J. The following activities shall be prohibited within City Parks and shall be considered a public nuisance:

1. Excavation, digging, trenching, grading, removing soil, or filling any area within a Park;

2.A.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23 (935 : Chapter 9.23) Redline Version 9.23.090

2. Removing, cutting, burning, or damaging any native vegetation within a Park;

3. Constructing or placing structures, fences, trails or roads;

4. Altering any natural stream channels or banks;

5. Introducing any pollutants, debris, or materials that may harm wildlife, plants, or degrade water quality;

6. Operating a motor vehicle within the Park boundaries except in specifically designated areas within the Park (e.g., paved roadways and parking lots);

7. Killing, chasing, wounding, harassing or capturing wild or domestic animals; and

8. Any other activity that may result in wildlife habitat degradation, disturbance, destruction, or erosion.

A. Organized Sports Activities: The following City Parks are available for Organized Sports Activities:

1. Stouffer Park

2. Mistlin Sports Park

3. Thiemann Athletic Park (Community Center)

4. Lan Park

5. Boesch Park

6. Skate Park

Applications for a Park Use Permit may not be made more than one year in advance of the date of the activity or event. The Director shall have twenty ten (2510) business days to approve or deny the application for a Park Use Permit and shall issue notice of the decision in writing or through electronic message. A person denied a Park Use Permit may appeal the Director’s decision to the Recreation Commission by filing a written appeal with the Director within 10 days of issuance of the Director’s decision. Decisions of the Recreation Commission made pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be final and conclusive, and shall not be subject to appeal.

2.A.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23 (935 : Chapter 9.23) Redline Version 9.23.090

All City and Recreation Commission sponsored events shall be exempt from a Park Use Permit.

B. Special Events: The following City parks are available for Special Events:

1. Stouffer Park

2. Mistlin Sports Park

3. Thiemann Athletic Park (Community Center)
The use of these parks for a special event requires a Special Event Permit pursuant to Chapter

5.40 of this Code.

9.23.080 Advertising within City Parks
The Recreation Commission, with the assistance of the Director, may establish, by resolution, programs, rules and procedures for the sale and maintenance of advertising space within any City Park. Any such programs, rules and procedures may include terms and conditions for advertisers, including the establishment of fees and charges for advertising space. The Director shall administer any such program, rules and procedures on behalf of the City.

A. public liability
B. damage to turf
C. public service
D. public health and safety

2.A.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23 (935 : Chapter 9.23) Redline Version 9.23.090
Such closure may be partial, so as to limit certain activities, as the City Administrator may reasonably find necessary.

2.A.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Redline changes from first reading to second reading of Municipal Code Chapter 9.23 (935 : Chapter 9.23) City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Kye Stevens, Recreation Director
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Ripon Golf Club Capital Expenditures

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the Sierra Golf Management (SGM) request to fund various improvements at the Ripon Golf Club in the amount of $83,245.93 (funding source: Golf Course Capital Improvement Account Fund).

BACKGROUND
On January 1, 2025, SGM assumed operations of the Jack Tone Golf Course, now known as the Ripon Golf Club. Under the terms of the Lease Agreement, SGM is responsible for operating the course, including performing required maintenance and capital replacement necessary to maintain a high-quality, publicly owned executive golf course.

A Golf Course Capital Improvement Fund was established during the prior lease. A portion of the operators lease payment is deposited into this fund to assist in funding golf course improvements.

The SGM Lease Agreement allows SGM to request the use of these funds from the Golf Course Capital Improvement Fund for two categories of improvements:

Long Term Capital Improvements: The operator may request reimbursement of up to 50% of the cost of improvements of a permanent nature, including the construction of new holes, replacement of improvement of greens, fairways, tee boxes, water features, buildings, structures, or other capital improvement expenditures approved by the City.

This does not include routine maintenance, equipment, or supplies.

Emergency Repairs: The operator may request reimbursement of up to 100% of the cost for repairs and restoration of the golf course in the event of a flooding or other “Acts of God” or resolving ADA claims.

3.A
Packet Pg. 118
All requests made by the operator are reviewed by the Golf Course Committee, which provides a recommendation to the City Council.

DISCUSSION
On March 16, 2026, the Golf Course Committee met with SGM at the golf course. The golf course manager gave a tour of the facility and described the proposed improvements being requested, including:

1. Maintenance Shed Building - $64,208.23
Construction of a new Maintenance Shed Building with concrete pad for equipment storage.

2. Trees for the left side of the driving range - $2,915.50 Installation of trees along the eastern edge of the driving range to help reduce the loss of golf balls.

3. New fence for the maintenance yard - $43,365
Installation of new fencing to enclose the maintenance yard.

4. Sprinkler System Replacement - $22,375
Replacement of 100 damaged sprinkler heads and adapters associated with the irrigation system.

5. Painting and dry rot repair - $8,525
Removal and repair of dry rot, followed by painting of the club house building.

6. Pump repair - $22,828.33
Repair of failed pump, which SGM attributes to lack of maintenance by previous lessee. This item has been completed to avoid damage to the turf.

7. Bunker Renovation - $2,274.79
Renovation of bunkers, including digging out dirt/grass, install a drainage system, and place new bunker sand.

The total estimated cost of the proposed improvements is $166,491.85. SGM is requesting the City fund 50% of this cost, or $83,245.93.

The Golf Course Committee reviewed this request and determined improvements #1-3 are consistent with the criteria for Long-Term Capital Improvements.

The improvements listed as #4-7 above are not typically consistent with the criteria of LongTerm Capital Improvements. However, the Committee recommends that the City Council consider a one-time funding for these items for the following reasons:
 A significant amount of deferred maintenance was not addressed by the previous lessee.

Approval of 50% funding for these items would allow SGM to advance these improvements.

3.A
Packet Pg. 119
 SGM will self-perform the sprinkler system replacement and bunker renovation using inhouse personnel and is not requesting reimbursement for labor costs, only half of the cost of materials.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Golf Course Capital Fund was established in 2008. The previous lessee did not take advantage of this fund. The current balance is $590,000. The City’s 50% share of the requested capital improvements ($83,245.93) would be funded from the Golf Course Capital Improvement Account Fund.

3.A
Packet Pg. 120
City Council
259 N. Wilma Avenue
Ripon, CA 95366
MEMO
To: Honorable City Council
From: Kevin Werner, City Administrator
Date: 04/14/2026
Subject: Short Range Transit Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

City Council to approve the 2026 Short-Range Transit Plan that evaluates the transit demand in Ripon and provides recommended changes to Ripon transit services designed to improve mobility and/or cost efficiency over the next 10 years.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Ripon operates a transit service that currently includes a fixed route service and a dial a ride service.

The Blossom Express fixed route service operates on Tuesday and Thursdays between 9:25 AM and 2:00 PM and provides service to various location in Ripon and Modesto, including Save Mart, Bethany Home, Ripon Library, Target, Vintage Faire Mall, and Kaiser Medical Center.

This service is coordinated with San Joaquin Regional Transit District Route 91 service and the Stanislaus Regional Transit Authority Route 48 for transfers within San Joaquin County and Stanislaus County, respectively.

The City contracts with SJRTD for the driver of the Blossom Express bus. Regular fare for this service is $2 for a one-way trip or $4 for a full day pass.

The Dial-a-Ride on-demand door-to-door service for qualifying disabled and older populations of Ripon. The DAR service is generally operated on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM and costs $15.00 to travel within the City’s 15-mile radius. Longer rides are available with an additional cost of $0.67 per mile (per IRS rates).

The City maintains a list of volunteer drivers for this service. If a driver is not available, the City is not able to schedule the DAR ride for a resident.

3.B
Packet Pg. 121
Transit Funding Summary
Transit services in Ripon are supported through a combination of local, state, and federal funding sources. Key funding allocations include Measure K Renewal Transit Funds, Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Transit Set-Aside, and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5311 program funds. These funding sources collectively provide the financial foundation necessary to operate and enhance transit services within the community.

If these funds are not utilized by the City of Ripon for transit services, they will be returned to the distributing entity or allocated to the SJRTD.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

This Short-Range Transit Plan evaluates the current setting for transportation in the Ripon area and recommends potential changes to Ripon’s transit services designed to improve mobility and/or cost efficiency over the next 10 years.

The following recommended changes are based on survey feedback, transit data specific to the City of Ripon, and input from the City Council provided during the March workshop:
 Addition of Microtransit Service: The SRJTD Van Go! Service has been a popular service for Ripon residents. Using the Van Go! Application, residents are able to schedule a trip for any destination in San Joaquin County. This service is currently available seven days a week between the hours of 8 am and 5 pm. The cost for this service is $4 per trip plus $0.50 per mile for trips longer than 5 miles. It is recommended the City of Ripon contract with SJRTD to expand the Van Go! service to support community engagement and access to local commerce. This additional service for Ripon residents is recommended to include (1) an ability to schedule trips within the Ripon city limits on Fridays and Saturdays from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and (2) an ability to schedule trips to and from the Ripon Farmers Market which operates every Thursday from May to September. The cost of this service would be the normal $4 per trip that is charged for Van Go!.
 Expansion of Dial-A-Ride Service: In order to provide a more consistent DAR service and improve connectivity to medical services, shopping, and other essential destinations for Ripon’s transit-dependent populations, it is recommended the City hire a part-time driver that would be available for rides during a set schedule of Monday through Thursday from 9:30 am to 2:30 pm, with a 24-hour advance reservation required. This would allow residents to better plan their trips with the availability of this service. This service would be available to any Ripon resident for service within the City of Ripon and Stanislaus County. Service outside of Ripon into San Joaquin County is not recommended because the SJRTD Van Go! service is currently available for trips to destinations within San Joaquin County. The fare for this service is recommended to be higher than that of the Blossom Express to encourage the use of the fixed route when possible. The general public fare would be $15 per one-way trip, while a lower fare of $5 per one-way trip would be available to seniors and disabled.  Continue current Fixed Route Blossom Express Service: Re-evaluate the need for expansion once the previously described service changes have been incorporated and in operation for at least one-year. Performance data—including ridership, cost efficiency,

3.B
Packet Pg. 122
and customer feedback—will be collected and evaluated to determine whether future fixed-route service expansion is warranted.

The table below summarizes the funding plan for these services over the next 10 years. 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 Operating Exp.

Driver 37,400 41,140 45,254 49,779 54,757 60,233 66,256 72,882 80,170 Bus Maintenance/Op 38,280 42,108 46,319 50,951 56,046 61,650 67,815 74,597 82,057 Admin./Other 46,092 50,701 55,772 61,349 67,484 74,232 81,655 89,821 98,803 Sub-Total Base Exp. 121,772 133,949 147,344 162,079 178,287 196,115 215,727 237,300 261,030 Driver 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Bus Maintenance/Op 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Admin./Other 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
SRTP Recommended Options:

Special Events 2,730 3,003 3,303 3,634 3,997 4,397 4,836 5,320 5,852 Microtransit Service - Fri/Sat/Fms Mkt 51,130 56,243 61,867 68,054 74,859 82,345 90,580 99,638 109,602 Expanded DAR 71,200 78,320 86,152 94,767 104,244 114,668 126,135 138,749 152,624 Sub-Total Add'l Exp. 122,330 134,563 148,019 162,821 179,103 197,014 216,715 238,387 262,225 Total Expense 244,102 268,512 295,364 324,900 357,390 393,129 432,442 475,686 523,255 Operating Rev.

Measure K Renewal 58,583 59,755 60,950 62,169 63,412 64,680 66,620 68,619 70,678 FTA 5311 a
122,051 134,256 138,000 140,800 143,600 146,500 149,500 152,400 155,400 LTF - Transit Funds 60,438 71,441 93,324 118,801 147,218 178,759 213,092 251,397 293,877 Fares 2,030 2,060 2,090 2,130 2,160 2,190 2,230 2,270 2,300 Interest 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 244,102 268,512 295,364 324,900 357,390 393,129 432,442 475,686 523,255 % Utilized
Measure K Renewal 98% 98% 98% 98% 98% 97% 97% 97% 97%
FTA 5311 a 92% 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
LTF - Transit Funds 22% 25% 32% 40% 48% 56% 65% 74% 84% No General Fund or other funds that would divert funding from street and road maintenance is used to fund these services.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The operations of the City of Ripon’s transit system, including the recommended expansion, would be funded by a combination of Measure K Renewal Transit funds, FTA 5311 federal transit funds, and the City’s LTF transit set aside funds.

Attachments:

1. 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices

3.B
Packet Pg. 123
City of Ripon
2026 Short Range Transit Plan
Prepared by LSC Transportation Consultants
Prepared for the
City of Ripon
April 8, 2026

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan)

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) City of Ripon
2026 Short Range Transit Plan
Prepared for
City of Ripon
259 N. Wilma Ave
Ripon, CA 95366
(209) 599-2108
Prepared by
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
2690 Lake Forest Road, Ste. C
Tahoe City, CA 96145
(530) 583-4053
April 8, 2026

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Study Area Characteristics .......................................................................................................... 3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Population Characteristics............................................................................................................................ 3 Transit-Dependent Population ..................................................................................................................... 5 Employment and Economy........................................................................................................................... 8 Major Activity Centers................................................................................................................................ 13 Recent Planning Studies.............................................................................................................................. 19 Chapter 3: Overview of Existing Transit Services ..................................................................................23 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 23 City of Ripon Transit Services...................................................................................................................... 24 Fare Structure ............................................................................................................................................. 25 City of Ripon Transit Capital Assets ............................................................................................................ 26 Other Transit Providers in the Ripon Area.................................................................................................. 26 Private Transportation................................................................................................................................ 29 Chapter 4: Blossom Express Public Survey Results...............................................................................31 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 31 Blossom Express Onboard Passenger Survey ............................................................................................. 31 Ripon Online Community Survey................................................................................................................ 31 Chapter 5: Recent Transit Operations and Performance ....................................................................33 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Blossom Express Ridership.......................................................................................................................... 33 Dial-A-Ride Ridership .................................................................................................................................. 37 City of Ripon Transit Services Financial Review.......................................................................................... 39 Blossom Express Performance Analysis...................................................................................................... 42 Dial-A-Ride Performance Analysis .............................................................................................................. 43 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 44 Chapter 6: Goals, Objectives, and Standards ............................................................................................45 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 45 Recommended Goals, Objectives, and Standards...................................................................................... 45 Chapter 7: Service Alternatives .....................................................................................................................49 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 49 Alternatives Analysis................................................................................................................................... 50 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................. 57

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page ii
Chapter 8: Capital Alternatives......................................................................................................................59 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 59 Transit Vehicles........................................................................................................................................... 59 Administrative and Operations Facility....................................................................................................... 59 Passenger Facilities..................................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 9: Institutional Alternatives...........................................................................................................61 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 61 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 61 Chapter 10: Marketing Alternatives ............................................................................................................63 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 63 Chapter 11: Short Range Transit Plan.........................................................................................................67 Plan Assumptions........................................................................................................................................ 67 Service Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 67 Administrative and Marketing Plan ............................................................................................................ 71 Capital Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 72 Financial Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 73 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................................................. 73 Appendix A: Demographic Maps
Appendix B: Blossom Express On-Board Passenger Survey Results Appendix C: Regional Driver Pay Rates

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Historic and Current Population ..................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Ripon Population Projections by Age Category .............................................................................. 5 Table 3: City of Ripon Demographic Characteristics..................................................................................... 7 Table 4: City of Ripon Transit Needs Index ................................................................................................... 9 Table 5: Ripon Local and Regional Commute Patterns - 2022.................................................................... 11 Table 6: Ripon Current and Annual Employment....................................................................................... 12 Table 7: Blossom Express Fares .................................................................................................................. 25 Table 8: Blossom Express Vehicle Fleet ...................................................................................................... 26 Table 9: Boarding and Alighting (Tuesday and Thursday) .......................................................................... 36 Table 10: FY 2023-24 Blossom Express Operating Expenses...................................................................... 40 Table 11: FY 2023-24 Blossom Express Operating Revenues ..................................................................... 41 Table 12: Blossom Express FY 2023-24 Cost Model.................................................................................... 41 Table 13: Blossom Express Parameters and Performance FY 2023-24....................................................... 42 Table 14: Historical Dial-a-Ride Operational Characteristics...................................................................... 43 Table 15: FY 2023-24 Dial-a-Ride Performance Measures ......................................................................... 44 Table 16: Blossom Express Service Alternatives Analysis........................................................................... 51

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page iii
Table 17: Blossom Express Service Alternatives Performance Analysis..................................................... 52 Table 18: Blossom Express Regional Connections...................................................................................... 55 Table 19: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan - Operating Costs........................................................... 69 Table 20: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan - Ridership ..................................................................... 75 Table 21: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan - Fare Revenue .............................................................. 76 Table 22: City of Ripon Transit Financial Plan............................................................................................. 77

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Study Area...................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2: Transit Needs Index ..................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 3: Ripon Activity Centers.................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 4: Modesto Activity Centers ............................................................................................................ 14 Figure 5: Planned Developments in Ripon.................................................................................................. 18 Figure 6: City of Ripon Organizational Chart............................................................................................... 23 Figure 7: Blossom Express Route ................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 8: Blossom Express Historical Ridership........................................................................................... 33 Figure 9: Blossom Express Ridership by Route by Month FY 2023-24........................................................ 34 Figure 10: Blossom Express Ridership by Weekday.................................................................................... 34 Figure 11: Blossom Express Ridership by Type........................................................................................... 35 Figure 12: Annual Blossom Express Service Quantities.............................................................................. 37 Figure 13: Blossom Express DAR Historical Ridership................................................................................. 38 Figure 14: Blossom Express DAR Ridership by Month................................................................................ 38 Figure 15: DAR Ridership by Type............................................................................................................... 39 Figure 16: Annual DAR Service Quantities.................................................................................................. 39

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page iv
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 1
Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION
Mobility is an essential issue that influences the economy, environment, and overall well-being across a region. The City of Ripon is located in the San Joaquin Valley, roughly 65 miles south of Sacramento and 12 miles north of Modesto. Ripon’s population includes a moderate proportion of seniors, persons with disabilities, and low-income individuals, all of whom increase the need for transit services. The City responded to the transit needs of the area in 2013 by providing a transit system, Blossom Express, with fixed route and demand response services, including connections to regional transit services provided within the San Joaquin Valley. While Blossom Express strives to provide an efficient service to meet the needs of residents, the area and the economic climate are ever-changing and evolving.

The City has retained LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc., to prepare a 2026 update to the Short-Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The SRTP analyzes the current setting for transportation in the Ripon area and then evaluates a wide range of alternatives or potential changes to public transit designed to improve mobility and/or cost efficiency over the next 10 years.

This SRTP reviews the factors influencing transit demand in Ripon, such as regional demographic information and existing unmet transit needs. Existing transit providers, as well as other intercounty services that operate within the county, are then summarized in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 includes a summary of the onboard passenger surveys conducted along Blossom Express services during November 2024. In the fifth chapter, a performance analysis of recent Ripon operations is conducted to determine the effectiveness of the current public transit services. Chapter 6 provides recommended goals, objectives, and standards, while Chapter 7 analyzes possible service alternatives that 1) address the strengths and weaknesses of the transit program, and 2) address concerns identified through public and stakeholder outreach, as discussed in Chapter 4. Chapter 8 presents the anticipated 10-year capital needs for Ripon, which include replacement vehicles, bus stops, and shelter improvements. Chapter 9 discusses the current transit landscape with regard to private contracting for transit drivers, and Chapter 10 summarizes marketing alternatives for Ripon to consider moving forward. Finally, Chapter 11 details the recommended Plan elements.

The information presented in this report will be used to inform the development of service, capital, funding, and institutional alternatives to be considered for inclusion in the final, updated 2026 Ripon SRTP.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 2
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 3
Chapter 2

STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS

STUDY AREA
The City of Ripon is located in the San Joaquin Valley, approximately 65 miles south of Sacramento and 12 miles north of Modesto (Figure 1). Covering 5.5 square miles, Ripon is home to approximately 16,092 residents (US Census Bureau 2020 Decennial Census), meaning the population density is about 2,925 persons per square mile1
. The City is bounded by the Stanislaus River to the South, with farmlands surrounding the City on all sides, a small greenbelt area of rural land to the south, and the small community of Salida to the Southeast. US Highway 99 (Hwy 99) is the major roadway running northsouth through the City, connecting it with the Sacramento and Stockton area to the north and Modesto to the south. There are no direct connections for daily passenger service via Amtrak or Greyhound. The closest depots are Modesto or Stockton.

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Historic and Projected Population
It is important when planning transit services to not only consider current characteristics of the population living in the service area but also how the population has changed and is likely to continue changing with time. Historical population information, sourced from the US Census Bureau, for Ripon, is shown in Table 1. As shown, in 2010, the population of the City of Ripon was 13,792. In 2015, the total population increased by 7.3 percent to 14,801 (1.4 percent annually). The population has continued to increase by another 8.7 percent (16,092 people) as of the 2022 census data. Overall, Ripon’s population is increasing at a proportional, similar rate to the rest of San Joaquin County.

Projections for population growth by age for the City of Ripon are shown in Table 2. As population projections by the City at the age group level are unavailable, San Joaquin County population projections by age group were applied to the City of Ripon population. With this in mind, the total population of Ripon is expected to increase by nearly 20 percent between 2020 and 2030. During the most recent decade (2010-2020), older populations between the ages of 65 and 74 years old grew the most (103.6 percent). Over the next 10 years, those between the ages of 75 and 84 years old will continue to grow the most out of any other age group (57.9 percent). The oldest senior population (85 years and older) is the second population age group to see high growth rates of 30.7 percent over the next decade. This will likely drive increased demand for transportation services catered to the needs of seniors, such as nonemergency medical transportation or paratransit. 1 "Ripon (city) QuickFacts". United States Census Bureau.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 4

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 5
The number of school-age young persons in Ripon will increase by 1.4 percent from 2020 to 2030, but is then estimated to remain relatively unchanged between 2030 and 2040, with only a 0.5 percent increase. Alternatively, the region is expecting a decline in school-aged (-7.8 percent) and college-aged (-

3.1 percent) populations over the next 10 years. If these projections prove to be correct, transportation for youth and college-aged populations may not be as high a priority amongst different age groups.

TRANSIT-DEPENDENT POPULATION
One of the main priorities of a public transit system is to meet the mobility needs of the transitdependent population. This includes youths, senior adults, persons with a disability, low-income persons, and persons who live in zero-vehicle households. These groups are more likely to rely on transit for everyday trips.

Table 1: Historic and Current Population
Population
% Annual
Growth Population
% Annual
Growth Population
% Annual
Growth
City of Ripon 13,792 -- 14,801 1.4% 16,092 1.2%
San Joaquin County 687,744 -- 726,106 1.1% 793,229 1.3% State of California 37,253,956 -- 38,907,642 0.9% 39,538,223 0.3% Source: US Census and California Department of Finance. 2010 2015 2022
Table 2: Ripon Population Projections by Age Category
Year
Total
(All Ages)
Preschool
(0-4 years)
School Age to
Young Adult
(5-19 years)
College Age
(20-24 years)
Working Age
(25-64 years)
Young
Retirees
(65-74 years)
Mature
Retirees
(75-84 years)
Older Seniors
(85 or older)
2010 13,792 1,172 3,958 455 6,730 786 483 221
2020 16,049 1,119 3,203 738 8,248 1,600 530 611
2030 19,244 1,135 2,953 715 8,892 1,970 837 799
2040 21,176 1,141 2,956 645 8,983 1,637 696 1,469
2010 to 2020 Change
Number 2,257 -53 -755 283 1,518 814 47 390
Percent 16.4% -4.5% -19.1% 62.2% 22.6% 103.6% 9.7% 176.5% 2020 to 2030 Change
Number 3,195 16 -250 -23 644 370 307 188
Percent 19.9% 1.4% -7.8% -3.1% 7.8% 23.1% 57.9% 30.7%
2030 to 2040 Change
Number 1,932 6 3 -70 90 -333 -141 670
Percent 10.0% 0.5% 0.1% -9.8% 1.0% -16.9% -16.9% 83.9%
Sources: San Joaquin Council of Governments, Adopted 2022 RTP/SCS Plan, Appendix Q; State of California, Department of Finance, Race/Ethnic Population with Age and Sex Detail, 2000–2010. Sacramento, California, September 2012; California Department of Finance. Report P-2B: Population Projections by Individual Year of Age, 2020-2060, California Counties and Total Population Only By Age and Race/Hispanics, and Gender: 2000-2010;
American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates for 2010 and 2020 Note: 2030 and 2040 projections were available for San Joaquin County, but not for the City of Ripon, so to calculate the projected population changes, the county change percentage was applied to the city population numbers.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 6
Demographic data about where potentially transit-dependent persons live within Ripon is shown in Table 3 at the census tract block group level, with detailed maps depicting this data included in Appendix A. The demographic groups considered to be transit-dependent are not exclusive from each other, and some people may fall into more than one category and therefore be double-counted. Despite this technicality, the census data is still valuable in showing trends regarding where large numbers of persons who may benefit from transit are living. Highlights from Table 3 include:
• A quarter (26 percent) of Ripon residents are youths under the age of 18. As approximately 22 percent of the State of California population are youths, Ripon has a slightly higher percentage of youths compared to the statewide. The greatest concentration of Ripon youths lives within Census Tract 50.03, Block Group 3 (14 percent or 657 people), and Census Tract 50.04, Block Groups 2 and 4 (13 percent or 594 or 608 youth, respectively). • Ripon residents who are senior adults over the age of 65 make up 15 percent of the total population. This is similar to the proportion of older adults statewide. The greatest concentration of Ripon senior adults lives within Census Tract 50.01, Block Group 2 (26 percent of seniors living in Ripon, or 690 people), followed by Census Tract 50.01, Block Group 3, Census Tract 50.03, Block Group 3, and Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 2 each have 11 percent of the total senior population (289-300 people).
• 5 percent of Ripon residents have a disability of some type. This is below the average for the State of California, which has an 11 percent disabled population as a whole. Approximately 22 percent of Ripon’s disabled residents (190 disabled people) live in Census Tract 50.01, Block Group 4. This is followed by 17 percent (147 disabled people), living in Census Tract 50.01, Block Group 2, and 15 percent (136 disabled people), living in Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 3.
• The City of Ripon has 5 percent (829 people) of its total population living below the poverty level. This is quite a bit less than the average poverty level percentage of California (12 percent).

The areas of Ripon with the highest concentration of people living below the poverty line are Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 4 (39 percent or 323 people), Census Tract 50.03, Block Group 2 (24 percent of people in poverty or 196 people), and Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 2 (13 percent or 110 people).
• It is estimated that 2 percent of Ripon households are zero-vehicle households, lower than the State of California’s 7 percent average. Of the 2 percent, or 108 households, currently living without access to a vehicle, 15 percent of the zero-vehicle households in Ripon, or 17 households, are located in Census Tract 50.01, Block Group 2. Another 12 percent of the zerovehicle households in Ripon, or 12-13 zero-vehicle households, are located within Census Tract

50.03, Block Group 3, Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 2, and Census Tract 50.04, Block Group 4.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 7
Table 3: City of Ripon Demographic Characteristics
Area Description # % # % # % # % # %

50.01 1 W. Stockton Ave - S. of Hwy 99 0.9 1,047 316 7% 64 2% 13 1% 0 0% 432 8 7%

50.01 2 W. of S. Acacia Ave - S. of Hwy 99 0.6 2,560 492 11% 690 26% 147 17% 17 2% 913 17 15%

50.01 3 E. of Manley Rd - N. of HWY 99 0.3 677 56 1% 289 11% 0 0% 0 0% 281 5 5%

50.01 4 W. of Manley Rd - N. of HWY 99 0.3 1,908 441 10% 225 8% 190 22% 36 4% 629 11 11%

50.03 2 E. of Ripon Rd - N. of Frontage Rd/Milgeo Ave 0.3 1,688 434 9% 215 8% 69 8% 196 24% 530 10 9%

50.03 3* W. of Ripon Rd - N. of Milgeo Ave 6.7 2,211 657 14% 300 11% 108 12% 70 8% 687 13 12%

50.03 4* N. of Frontage Rd - HWY 99 3.3 1,429 314 7% 210 8% 99 11% 77 9% 589 11 10%

50.04 1 N. of Stanislaus River - W. of S. Moher Rd 3.8 1,054 325 7% 119 4% 8 1% 0 0% 312 6 6%

50.04 2 S. of Main Street - E. Jack Tone Rd 0.2 1,847 608 13% 295 11% 99 11% 110 13% 599 12 12%

50.04 3 S. of Main Street - W. of Jack Tone Rd 0.2 1,384 372 8% 132 5% 136 15% 0 0% 463 10 9%

50.04 4* N. of Stanislaus River - E. of Curtis Ave 7.8 1,643 594 13% 148 6% 12 1% 323 39% 599 12 12% Total 24 17,448 4,609 26% 2,687 15% 881 5% 829 5% 6,034 108 2% Source: US Census Bureau American Community Survey 2022 5-Year Estimates. X% = (bolded) tracts with the highest percentage of population type.

Block
Group
Square
Miles
Total
Persons
Note 1: Data is not available by Block Group, so the Census Tract proportions were calculated and then applied to the Block Groups to estimate the Zero-Vehicle Households.

Total
Households
Zero-Vehicle
Households1
Youth
(Under 18 Years) Seniors (65+)
Persons with a
Disability
Persons Below
Census Poverty Level
Tract

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 8
Transit Needs Index
It is helpful to consider all five of the potentially transit-dependent groups simultaneously to paint a better picture of what areas of Ripon have the greatest relative transit needs. To better compare the transit needs of different neighborhoods in the City, LSC developed a Transit Needs Index (TNI) (Table 4) for Ripon using the demographic data presented in Table 3.

The first step in developing the TNI was to calculate the density of each specific transit-dependent group within each census tract block group (for example, there are 345 youth per square mile in Census Tract

50.01, Block Group 1). Then, the ranges of densities for each subpopulation were divided into quintiles.

Population densities in the highest quintile were assigned a score of 5 to represent the high density and resulting high transit need, while the lowest population densities were assigned a score of 1 to represent the lower need for transit. The scores for each subgroup were then summed to yield an overall transit needs index rank for each census tract (Table 4 and Figure 2). Ultimately, the TNI measures the relative need for transit services from the population living in the census tracts, with possible values ranging from a low of 5 to a high of 25. A score of 25 indicates the greatest relative need for transit services considering all five transit-dependent subgroups.

The area south of Main Street, between Jack Tone Road and Robert Avenue (TNI score of 24) has the highest overall transit need.

EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMY
Some of the most regular transit riders are those who rely on the bus for commuting to and from work.

This section reviews the Ripon economic characteristics influencing transit demand for the purpose of commuting.

Major employers can be significant transit trip generators due to the many employees who need to get to and from work in many areas. Located in the southeastern area of Ripon are large industrial businesses such as Diamond Pet Food, Ripon Manufacturing Company, NuCal Foods. Also in this area are trucking companies, including California Freight, Wever Trucking, and Apple Freight. The City of Ripon is considered a bedroom community for other Central Valley locations, such as Stockton, Modesto, or Manteca. As such, many of Ripon’s residents commute to and from another area for work. Table 5 shows where employees who work in Ripon live and where residents of Ripon commute for work.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 9
Table 4: City of Ripon Transit Needs Index
Legend
1 2
3 4
5 Census
Tract
Block
Group Area Description
Youth (Under 18
Years)
Senior Adults
(65+)
Persons with a
Disability
Persons Below
Poverty Level
Zero-Vehicle
Households

50.01 1 W. Stockton Ave - S. of Hwy 99 1 1 1 1 1 5

50.01 2 W. of S. Acacia Ave - S. of Hwy 99 2 4 2 1 3 12

50.01 3 E. of Manley Rd - N. of HWY 99 1 4 1 1 2 9

50.01 4 W. of Manley Rd - N. of HWY 99 3 3 5 1 3 15

50.03 2 E. of Ripon Rd - N. of Frontage Rd/Milgeo Ave 3 3 2 5 3 16

50.03 3* W. of Ripon Rd - N. of Milgeo Ave 1 1 1 1 1 5

50.03 4* N. of Frontage Rd - HWY 99 1 1 1 1 1 5

50.04 1 N. of Stanislaus River - W. of S. Moher Rd 1 1 1 1 1 5

50.04 2 S. of Main Street - E. Jack Tone Rd 5 5 4 5 5 24

50.04 3 S. of Main Street - W. of Jack Tone Rd 3 2 5 1 3 14

50.04 4* N. of Stanislaus River - E. of Curtis Ave 1 1 1 1 1 5 *= Census Tract is partially outside of the City of Ripon Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Rank
Very Low Rank
Low Rank
Medium Rank
High Rank
Very High Rank
Overall Transit
Needs Index Rank

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 10

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 11
2022
Counties
# of
Jobs
% of
Total Cities/Towns
# of
Jobs
% of
Total
San Joaquin County 2,073 43% Ripon 925 19%
Stanislaus County 1,717 36% Modesto 721 15%
Merced County 250 5% Manteca 301 6%
Sacramento County 71 1% Stockton 223 5%
Contra Costa County 54 1% Turlock 171 4%
Fresno County 53 1% Salida 123 3%
Alameda County 52 1% Ceres 122 3%
Santa Clara County 48 1% Riverbank 112 2%
Los Angeles County 42 1% Oakdale 97 2%
Calaveras County 37 1% Tracy 89 2%
Tuolumne County 32 1% Escalon 65 1%
Madera County 25 1% Merced 64 1%
Monterey County 24 1% Lodi 53 1%
Kern County 19 0% Lathrop 47 1%
Solano County 19 0% Livingston 37 1%
Other Cities 262 5% Other Cities 1,628 34%
Total 4,778 Total 4,778
Counties
# of
Jobs
% of
Total Cities/Towns
# of
Jobs
% of
Total
San Joaquin County 3,014 37% Ripon 925 11%
Stanislaus County 1490 18% Modesto 898 11%
Alameda County 1072 13% Stockton 588 7%
Santa Clara County 664 8% Manteca 444 5%
Contra Costa County 312 4% San Jose 283 4%
Sacramento County 267 3% Tracy 257 3%
San Francisco County 162 2% Fremont 225 3%
San Mateo County 145 2% Livermore 192 2%
Los Angeles County 118 1% Oakland 181 2%
Placer County 85 1% San Francisco 162 2%
Solano County 71 1% Pleasanton 117 1%
Orange County 53 1% Salida 110 1%
Fresno County 52 1% Lathrop 106 1%
San Bernardino County 46 1% Sacramento 106 1%
Sonoma County 39 0% Ceres 91 1%
Other Counties 487 6% Other Cities 3,392 42%
Total 8,077 Total 8,077
Source: US Census Bureau LEHD Database, 2022
Table 5: Ripon Local and Regional Commute Patterns
Where Ripon Workers Commute From
Where Ripon Residents Work and Commute to

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 12
As shown in Table 5, only 11 percent of employed City of Ripon residents work within the City of Ripon.

Ripon residents commute to the Cities of Modesto (11 percent, or 898 people) and Stockton (7 percent, or 588 people). Nearly 70 percent of all Ripon residents work in either San Joaquin County (37 percent, or 3,014 people), Stanislaus County (18 percent, or 1,490 people), or Alameda County (13 percent, or 1,072 people). At the same time, 19 percent of the jobs located within the City of Ripon are held by Ripon residents, with another 15 percent (721 people) commuting from Modesto.

Private vehicles are the primary form of commute transportation for Ripon residents, as 90 percent of City of Ripon workers either drive alone or carpool to get to their place of work. In comparison, only 1 percent use public transit to complete their commute2
.

This dataset does not indicate whether a job is held by a remote worker. Despite the data not clarifying who works in-person or remotely, most of this information can be logically assumed. For instance, most Ripon residents holding jobs that are technically located in Los Angeles County are likely working remotely. Even with these caveats, the Census LEHD data still provides useful information about popular commute patterns that could potentially be served by transit.

Employment and Unemployment Statistics
Table 6 shows the current labor force, including the number employed and unemployed, as well as the historical employment since 2018. Aside from a higher unemployment rate during the pandemic in 2020 (4 percent), Ripon has experienced strong employment, with the percentage of unemployment being

1.8 percent in 2022.
2 U.S. Census Bureau. (2022). Sex of Workers by Means of Transportation to Work [B08006 for 2022].

Table 6: Ripon Current and Annual Employment
Month (2023) Labor Force Employment Unemployment
Unemployment
Rate
January 7,900 7,700 200 2.20%
February 8,000 7,800 200 2.20%
March 8,000 7,800 200 2.20%
April 8,000 7,800 200 1.90%
May 8,000 7,900 200 1.90%
June 8,000 7,900 200 2.10%
July 8,000 7,900 200 2.10%
August 8,100 7,900 200 2.20%
September 8,100 8,000 200 2.20%
October 8,100 8,000 200 2.20%
November 8,100 7,900 200 2.20%
December 8,000 7,900 200 2.30%
Year Labor Force Employment Unemployment
py
Rate
2022 8,000 7,800 100 1.8%
2021 7,700 7,400 200 3.0%
2020 7,500 7,200 300 4.0%
2019 7,600 7,400 200 2.0%
2018 7,500 7,400 200 2.1%
Source: California Employment Development Department, Unemployment Rates

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 13

MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS
A large proportion of transit trips, if not to work, are to other major activity centers such as hospitals, grocery stores, social service agencies, tribal headquarters, and schools. Figures 3 and 4 identify some important activity centers in Ripon (Figure 3) and nearby communities of Salida and northern Modesto (Figure 4), including schools, government offices, major shopping areas, parks, and senior services.

There are limited government, social services, and medical and dental services in Ripon, and many residents travel to Stockton and Manteca in San Joaquin County and Modesto in Stanislaus County for these services. Social services provided through San Joaquin County are located in Stockton.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 14

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 15
Ripon Activity Centers
• Senior Centers typically generate a need for transportation for the programs offered, particularly congregate meal programs. The Ripon Senior Center offers services and activities to residents who are 50 years of age or older. The senior center also offers congregate meals Monday through Friday at 11:30 AM.
• Bethany Home Society of San Joaquin County (Bethany Homes) operates several facilities offering senior living, including independent living, residential living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. This organization has a continuing partnership with the City of Ripon and operates the City’s DAR vehicle, even for local residents who are not clients of Bethany Homes. Bethany Homes also offers adult day-care services and in-home care services to clients. • Cleo’s Nursing Services is an organization of group homes that offer assisted living services to clients requiring more day-to-day care than they may be able to receive in a traditional residential environment.
• Almond Blossom Apartments is a low-income housing in Ripon. Apartments are rented, offering a sliding scale based on a person’s income ability. There is an income cap on how much a person can make to be able to live in the apartments.
• Ripon Interfaith Food Pantry and Clothing offers Ripon residents food and clothing assistance on Thursday mornings and evenings.
• Clinton McCausland American Legion Post 190 offers services and support to veterans in Ripon, CA, including Voucher Services for assistance, including emergency housing, food, utilities, and prescriptions. The organization also operates a volunteer transport service called VEAP, which has a van and relies on volunteer drivers to drive qualifying passengers (current or former service members of the US Armed Forces and/or their family members who reside in San Joaquin County) to appointments, errands, and some recreational opportunities. • Ripon City Hall offers many services to residents, including paying utilities and applying for permits. There is also information available to residents about many aspects of city governance. • Ripon Memorial Library offers assistance to residents with technology and accessing the internet, and also offers some recreational programs.
• The United States Post Office offers many services, including money orders, passport applications, and change of address.
• Medical Services in Ripon are somewhat limited, as there is no hospital or urgent care in Ripon.

Residents travel to Modesto, Manteca, Stockton, or other regional medical facilities. There are a handful of primary care practices and dental offices in Ripon. There are also two pharmacies in Ripon where prescriptions can be filled, a Walgreens and a CVS. • Grocery and Retail Stores in Ripon include Save Mart, Dollar General, Tractor Supply, and Dollar Tree.
• Banks in Ripon include BMO, Bank of Stockton, and Oak Valley Community Bank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 16
Relevant Modesto Activity Centers
Blossom Express follows a route south of Hwy 99 to Northwestern Modesto, where there are medical services, including hospitals, laboratories, pharmacies, and retail complexes with numerous retail stores. • Medical Facilities in Modesto include:
o Kaiser Permanente Modesto Medical Center and Medical Offices, 4601 Dale Rd o Sutter Health, 3612 Dale Rd
o Vintage Faire Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Suite B, 3620 Dale Rd o DaVita Archway Dialysis of Modesto, 3800 Dale Rd
o Walgreens Pharmacy, 4201 Dale Rd
o Pharmacy I Kaiser Permanente Dale Road Medical Offices, 3800 Dale Rd o CVS Pharmacy, 2900 Standiford Ave
o CVS Pharmacy, 3900 Sisk Rd
• Grocery and Retail Stores along Blossom Express in Modesto include Costco, Trader Joe’s, Vintage Fair Mall, and Vintage Commons retail complex (includes Best Buy, Target, TJ Maxx). • Banks in Modesto include one Wells Fargo.

Ripon Unified School District
The Ripon Unified School District serves approximately 5,183 students at 5 elementary schools, K-8 schools, and high schools3
. The school district provides transportation for students who live in rural areas of the school district and for qualified individuals with disabilities. Parents who live in Ripon and have able-bodied students may pay a small fee to enroll their students in the school bus services.

Because Blossom Express runs on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and not Mondays through Fridays, it is not a reliable transportation means for students to travel to or from their schools. Elementary and K-8 schools are listed below:
• Kindergarten through 8th Grade
o Colony Oak Elementary School, 22241 S Murphy Road, Grades K-8, 443 students o Ripon Elementary School, 509 W Main St, K-8, Grades 459 students o Ripon Elementary School, 415 Oregon St, K-8, Grades 471 students o Weston Elementary School, 1660 Stanley Dr, Grades K-8, 439 students o Park View Elementary School, 751 Cindy Dr, Grades K-8, 461 students • High School (Grades 9-12)
o Ripon High School, 301 N Acacia Ave, Grades 9-12, 1,048 students o Harvest High School, 729 W Main St, Grades 9-12, 25 students 3 Source: School profile. (CA Dept of Education). (n.d.). https://www.cde.ca.gov/sdprofile/details.aspx?cds=39686506109284

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 17
Planned Development Projects in Ripon
Development is expected in Ripon in the near future; however, many projects are still in the preapplication phase, and project details are limited. Below is a list of some (not all) current planned developments in Ripon. Figure 5 shows relevant planned developments as they relate to the Blossom Express route.

Proposed Residential Developments
• Meadowood Subdivision, 980, 1050, and 1001 Warren Road – medium-density residential subdivision with 88 lots.
• Pereira Subdivision, 22874 & 22898 N. Ripon Road – a low-density residential project with 48 lots.
• The Cottages at Pine & Acacia, 230 N Acacia Avenue – low-density and attached tri-plex with an ADU.
• Gilbert Drive Townhomes, 126 & 154 Gilbert Drive – medium-density 16-unit townhouse complex.

Recently Completed and Future Planned Commercial Developments New planning developments play a crucial role in shaping the future of urban and rural areas by addressing the changing needs of communities. The relationship between these developments and transportation services is fundamental, as efficient and well-integrated transit options can enhance accessibility, reduce traffic congestion, and promote sustainable growth. By thoughtfully aligning transportation services with new developments, we can ensure that residents have easy access to employment, education, healthcare, and recreational opportunities, ultimately improving the overall quality of life and fostering economic vitality. The following is a short list of both recently completed and future planned residential and commercial developments in Ripon (also shown in Figure 5).

Recently Completed
• The Terraces at Bethany Home, 816 W Main Street/Vera Avenue – construction of a 106,894 sq. ft. residential care facility.
• Legacy Athletic Center (Ride 209) Fitness Club, 711 Kamps Way – construction of a 25,554 sq. ft. fitness facility.

Future Planned
• Blue Lite Expansion, 258 Frontage Road – converting a convenience store into a hotel. • TownePlace Suites by Marriott Hotel, 333 E. Main Street – construction of a 54,382 sq. ft. hotel.
• Arc Way Commercial Center, 769 Frontage Road – construction of a gas station with a convenience store and a retail building shopping center.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 18

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 19

RECENT PLANNING STUDIES
The SRTP should both reflect and complement the goals and strategies presented in other related studies recently adopted in Ripon. Recently completed plans related to the SRTP effort include local studies related to land-use, including:
(These studies were reviewed while updating the SRTP to ensure the final 10-year plan aligns with the work of these other studies).

County and Regional Plans
San Joaquin Council of Governments Regional Transit Systems Plan (2016) In its role as the local Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) is responsible for long-range planning in the San Joaquin region. The Regional Transit Systems Plan is a plan that encompasses all the different transit and bus operators in the county, including the City of Ripon.

San Joaquin County General Plan 2035 (2016)
SJCOG developed the General Plan, a document that serves to set policy regarding land use and development. The document sets forth guidelines to minimize urban sprawl and specifically promote compact and/or horizontal development planned close to transit access. 2022 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS)
SJCOG developed a combined RTP and SCS plan. One of SJCOG’s responsibilities is to prepare updates to the RTP every four years so San Joaquin County can qualify for federal and state transportation funding.

An RTP is a long-range transportation planning document that outlines strategies and projects to improve state highways, local roads, public transit, tribal transportation, and aviation in the study area during the upcoming twenty years. An SCS is developed as an approach to meeting greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for cars and trucks with a transportation policy and land use development policy. The most recent update to San Joaquin County’s RTP and SCS was completed in 2022.

Relevant to the Ripon SRTP update:
• The rail commission and San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority are considering extending options for rail service to Sacramento, including adding a new station in Ripon • Developing infrastructure to support intracity transit was identified as a priority for several cities in San Joaquin County, including Ripon.
• An existing initiative will continue to use Vamos EZHub as a cashless mobile ticketing and fare payment system on all the transit agencies in San Joaquin County, including Ripon’s Blossom Express.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 20
FY 2024-2025 Unmet Transit Needs
SJCOG is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for San Joaquin County. Per the California Transportation Development Act (TDA), RTPAs are required to hold an annual hearing to determine unmet transit needs in the region. TDA funding must be spent on any unmet transit needs deemed through the hearing process to be reasonable to meet before the RTPA can allocate any TDA funding to other types of transportation projects, such as street and road maintenance. SJCOG uses the following definitions for unmet transit needs:

The following definition was approved by the SJCOG Board in February 2018: “Unmet Transit Needs are those trips required but not currently provided within San Joaquin County for residents who use or would use public transportation to meet their life expectations (school, work, shopping, errands, recreation, etc.).”
Definition of “Reasonable to Meet” Unmet Transit Needs
An unmet transit need that meets the definition of Unmet Transit Needs above and meets all the following criteria shall be considered reasonable to meet:

1. Equity – The proposed UTN will increase equity for transit-dependent populations, older individuals, persons with disabilities, and populations identified by Title VI.

2. Operational Feasibility – The system can be implemented safely and in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations.

3. Potential Ridership – The proposed service will meet ridership potential metrics, as defined by the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC).

4. Cost Effectiveness – The proposed transit service will not affect the ability of the overall system of the implementing agency or agencies to meet the applicable Transit Systems Performance Objectives or the state farebox ratio requirement after the exemption period if the service is eligible for the exemption.

5. Funding – The proposed service would not cause the claimant to incur expenses in excess of the maximum allocation of all TDA (LTF and STA) funds.

Based on public feedback received through the FY 2023-24 Unmet Transit Needs process, the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) identified 42 Unmet Transit Needs in San Joaquin County that would be reasonable to meet.

There were two comments that were submitted to be considered as an unmet need in the City of Ripon; however, none of them were considered reasonable to meet.

1. Ripon to Manteca/Lathrop ACE Station. - This comment was considered an Unmet Transit Need but was not reasonable to meet.

2. Provide service on Blossom Express, 5 days a week, as well as additional trips. - This comment is not considered an Unmet Transit Need.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 21
City of Ripon Plans
City of Ripon General Plan 2040
Adopted in 2006, the City of Ripon General Plan is a comprehensive, long-range plan that guides and prioritizes future development and city projects. The study consists of multiple elements that are focused on specific topics such as land use, circulation, community health and safety, open space and conservation, housing, and economic development. Each element outlines goals, policies, and implementation programs for its specific focus. Ripon residents had multiple opportunities to provide input to ensure the plan’s goals and policies reflect residents’ concerns.

The General Plan’s Chapter 3: Circulation discusses topics related to the SRTP:

Intercity Transit - The City of Ripon planned to enhance its public transit services to better serve residents, particularly the elderly and physically disabled. The goal to transition to a professional service with a larger fleet, offering daily trips and possibly limited fixed-route options during peak hours has been met. The City recognized the adaptability of transit services and was prepared to invest in transit as demand increases, adjusting plans based on community growth and the needs of Ripon residents.

Intracity Transit – At the time of the adoption of the General Plan, the City of Ripon offered a dial-a-ride service with a 9-passenger bus, operated by volunteers for seniors and disabled individuals. This service includes weekly trips to Modesto for medical appointments and shopping. Additionally, the San Joaquin Regional Transit District (SJRTD) provides fixed-route service to Ripon and the surrounding areas. By 2016, significant demand for commuter services was expected. The SJCOG has initiated a regional transit service with SJRTD, featuring a weekday fixed-route system connecting Stockton, Manteca, and Ripon, serving both commuters and shoppers with stops throughout the community.

Train Service – Rail service is provided by agencies other than Ripon’s Blossom Express, but ACE, a rail line between Stockton and San Jose, may provide commuter services to the Ripon area in the future.

Park and Rides Lots – To continue to serve commuters, a Park and Ride lot is available at the Industrial Avenue location. A mention was made of developing another one near the Olive interchange, but this has not happened at this time.

City of Ripon 2009 Short Range Transit Plan
The 2009 City of Ripon SRTP was set forth to create a plan to expand and provide new, professional transit services to replace a volunteer-driven dial-a-ride service. The plan considered current population demographics, conducted surveys, and incorporated other community feedback to determine what kind of transit service would best serve Ripon.

The plan proposed one fixed route that provided service between the Ripon Senior Center and the Vintage Faire Mall. A similar service was implemented between the Ripon Library and the Modesto Target. The service now runs twice a week (Tuesdays and Thursdays) and has four runs per day (two AM and two PM routes). The SRTP also laid out a plan for administrative oversight, maintenance, marketing, and a financial plan that was fiscally responsible, while also providing the city with the transit service.

North Pointe Specific Plan-2015
North Pointe is a 310-acre area located in northern Ripon. The North Pointe Specific Plan was developed and adopted in 2015 as a long-range plan to provide guidance as to how the development of the North

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 22
Pointe area would occur. The document primarily focuses on economic development, land use, character, circulation, infrastructure, and financing.

Chapter 4, Transportation Planning and Streetscape Design, discusses transit planning for the North Pointe area of Ripon, particularly:
“4.1 Transportation Planning Objectives”
Integrate pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and open space features into the Plan to encourage reduced automobile use and vehicle miles traveled.

Plan for the potential future expansion of transit service in the Plan Area.

Transit Facilities
There are two existing fixed-route bus services to the NPSP Area. One is operated by RTD, with a single stop on Colony Road near Goodwin Drive, and the other is operated by the City of Ripon with a single stop at the same location. However, it is reasonable to anticipate that as the NPSP Area develops, the need for expanded transit service will substantially increase. Therefore, potential additional future bus stop locations were explored and identified for Hope Dr, Colony Rd, Fulton Ave, and River Rd.

Park-and-Ride
A Park-and-Ride parking lot was under construction during the adoption of the North Pointe Specific Plan immediately outside of the NPSP Area at the northwest corner of the SR-99/ Jack Tone Road Interchange. Plans called for this 0.95-acre site to be developed with an approximately 60-space parking lot. Construction is being funded through the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program.”
City of Ripon Housing Element Update - The City of Ripon developed its Housing Element to set guidelines for future residential developments with meaningful actions, guidelines, and metrics to accomplish the goals set by the Housing Element. Those that relate to transit:
“The Transportation Element seeks to reduce the reliance on cars and increase the convenience of alternate modes through new connections and improved circulation for transit, bikes, and pedestrians.

Goal D: Encourage Energy Efficient Conservation in Residential Development Policy D2. Encourage high-density residential development and development projects serving senior, disabled, and other special needs households to be located in areas that have services (grocery stores, pharmacies, schools, parks, etc.) within walking distance and/or are served by public transit.”

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 23
Chapter 3

OVERVIEW OF EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES

INTRODUCTION
There are a number of public, private, and non-profit organizations that operate transit and transportation services in the City of Ripon. While all of these organizations help move people around, each transportation program differs in the types of services, availability, and passenger eligibility it offers. This chapter primarily discusses the services and amenities of the city’s public transit system, Blossom Express and Dial-A-Ride (DAR), with a brief description of other regional services summarized afterward.

Organizational Structure and Transit Staffing
The Ripon City Council serves as the governing board for Blossom Express transit services. A full chart of the City of Ripon government organization is shown in Figure 6. Transit services are managed by the City of Ripon. The City contracts with SJRTD to provide the Blossom Express driver. City staff oversee passenger data collection and funding. The current Dial-A-Ride service is managed by the City and operated by one of two volunteer drivers on an as-needed basis.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 24
CITYOF RIPON TRANSIT SERVICES:

The City of Ripon operates one fixed route service, Blossom Express. A demand response Dial-A-Ride service is also available to the general public, and ADA paratransit services operate as scheduled daily.

These services are presented and evaluated below.

Blossom Express Fixed Route
Generally, Blossom Express transit service is offered on Tuesdays and Thursdays, between 9:25 AM and 2:00 PM. All regular weekday fixed routes run on hourly headways. Below is a brief description of Blossom Express service, which is depicted in Figure 7.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 25
The Blossom Express operates between 9:25 AM and 2:00 PM and serves a loop of Ripon, drives south on Hwy 99 to Northern Modesto, and serves a loop of retail and medical providers. The service then travels north along Hwy 99 back to Ripon. The bus completes 4 loops, and on the 5th loop, it will only drop off passengers. The service begins at the Ripon Memorial Library on Main and Elm at 25 minutes after the hour in the morning and 15 minutes after the hour in the afternoon.

Major stops in Ripon along this route include shopping destinations (Save Mart, Dollar General, CVS, Walgreens), services (Banks, the Post Office, City Hall, medical services), and residential areas within Ripon. Major stops in Modesto include large retail complexes (Target/Vintage Commons, Vintage Faire Mall, etc.) and medical complexes (Kaiser Permanente, DeVita Archway Dialysis Clinic). Transfers to San Joaquin RTD Route 91 are available at 10:51 AM at the Ripon Senior Center (intersection of Wilma and 4th) and the intersection of W. Colony and Goodwin at 10:45 AM. STANRTA Route 48 transfers are available at the Vintage Faire Mall and Kaiser Permanente Medical Center. Transfers to STANRTA Routes 22, 30, 31, 37, 48, the 70 ACE Commuter, and the 80 Stockton Commuter routes are available at the Vintage Faire Mall as well.

Blossom Express Dial-A-Ride
The City of Ripon provides on-demand door-to-door services through the Dial-A-Ride (DAR) services for qualifying disabled and older populations of Ripon. Previously, the DAR service was operated through a partnership between the City and Bethany Homes. Since Bethany Homes has purchased their own vehicle, they provide services in-house as needed. The City’s DAR is currently not openly advertised, as staffing resources are limited. The DAR service operates within the city limits on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM and costs $15.00 to travel within the City’s 15-mile radius. Longer rides are available with an additional cost of $0.67 per mile (per IRS rates). To book a ride, one must call City Hall (209-599- 2108) at least 24 hours in advance. While passengers have historically been affiliated with Bethany Homes residents, the service is available to all disabled and senior residents; however, many community residents seem to be unfamiliar with the service.

FARE STRUCTURE
Blossom Express
One-way fares for the general public are $2, and discount fares (senior/disabled/Medicare) are $1.00 per one-way trip (Table 7). Discounted fare is valid for seniors (Ages 60 and up), K-12 students, college students with a valid school ID, Medicare cardholders, and Certificate of Eligibility cardholders.

Table 7: Blossom Express Fares
Fare Type Regular Discounted1
One Way Fare $2.00 $1.00
Deviation $2.00 $1.00
Full Day Pass Fare $4.00 $2.00
Ten-Ride Discount Booklet $16.00 $8.00
Source: City of Ripon
Note 1: Discounts are for seniors (age 60 and older), Medicare card holders, students (children ages 5 through 17 and college students with valid School ID), and Certificate of Eligibility card holders.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 26
Passengers may request the bus to deviate from the route up to 1 mile; the fare for the deviation is $2 for a general fare and $1 for a discounted fare. Monthly passes are not available; however, there are full-day passes ($4 general fare and $ 2 discount fare), and 10-ride tickets are $16 for the general public and $8 for students with IDs/seniors/disabled/Medicare

DAR FARES
Senior and disabled residents pay $15.00 per ride if it is within the 15-mile radius of Ripon. With prior approval, rides can be provided for a distance of greater than 15 miles for an additional $0.67 per mile, per IRS mileage rates.

CITYOF RIPON TRANSIT CAPITAL ASSETS
Blossom Express Vehicle Fleet
As shown in Table 8, the Blossom Express transit program has a total of two vehicles in the fleet. The fixed route vehicles both have a capacity of 30 passengers, with one to three wheelchair positions. Both vehicles have a two-capacity bike rack and are fueled by compressed natural gas (CNG). Vehicles are fueled and maintained by city employees at city-owned facilities. Based on the age of each vehicle, they have both reached their useful life per Federal Transit Administration (FTA) regulation and should be planned for replacement.

Passenger Amenities
During the onboard passenger surveying process, LSC evaluated a total of 23 bus stops. Of these, 21 have Blossom Express signs mounted on posts, 8 have benches, and 5 have shelters. Many of the stops with benches and/or shelters are maintained by StanRTA and do not belong to the City of Ripon, but Blossom Express passengers benefit from them anyway. Of the bus stops that have mounted signs, 6 were fading, so the City of Ripon may consider replacing these signs sometime in the future.

OTHER TRANSIT PROVIDERS IN THE RIPON AREA
Ripon has several other transit providers that operate within the region and provide important connections to Ripon from regional and inter-regional areas. These transportation services are described below.

Altamont Corridor Express
The Altamont Corridor Express runs from Stockton to San Jose, offering 4 round trips per day. The route does not run directly through Ripon, so passengers would need to travel south to Stockton to make the connection. Fares from Stockton to San Jose are approximately $15.50 one way.

Table 8: Blossom Express Vehicle Fleet
Agency ID Make Cutaway Model Year Mileage Capacity
69 Gillig G27B102N4 Low Floor 2012 59,473 30 2027
82 Gillig Low Floor 2018 34,047 30 2033
Source: City of Ripon
Note 1: Assumes a 12-15-year or 150,000-250,000 mile useful life based on FTA useful life recommendations for transit vehicles.

Est. Vehicle
Replacement Date1

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 27
eTrans
The City of Escalon transit service eTrans is available to the general public. This dial-a-ride service operates within the City of Escalon and provides a connection to Riverbank. eTrans also offers a flex route to Modesto, which serves the Vintage Faire Mall and the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center.

Blossom Express passengers can transfer to eTrans in Modesto. eTrans services are fare free.

San Joaquin Regional Transit District
The San Joaquin Regional Transit District (RTD) provides public transit services in the Stockton Metropolitan Area, as well as Intercity, Interregional, and Rural Transit Services countywide. Below is a description of services as they pertain to the City of Ripon. • Route 91 operates between Ripon and the RTD Downtown Transit Center in Stockton. There are five Northbound trips with the first trip starting at 6:55 AM, and four Southbound trips with the first one starting at 7:30 AM. This route operates on weekdays. Major transfer points are located at the RTD Transit Station, Manteca Transit Station, the Ripon Save Mart at Colony and Goodwin Dr, and the Ripon Senior Center at Fourth St and Wilma Ave. This route is designed as a commuter route between Ripon and Stockton.

General public fares for Intercity and Hopper services are $1.50, and discount fares are $0.75 per oneway trip with the option to buy a general fare 1-day pass for $3.00 or a 31-day pass for $65. General Public Fares for Commuter services are $7.00, with the option to buy a monthly pass for $167. There are no timed transfers between Route 91 and Blossom Express.

Access San Joaquin
Access San Joaquin is the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for San Joaquin County.

The CTSA was formed by local transit agencies and the SJCOG in October 2018. The local agencies that participate in the CTSA include:
• Altamont Corridor Express
• Escalon eTrans
• Ripon Blossom Express
• Lodi GrapeLine
• Manteca Transit
• Tracy Tracer
• San Joaquin RT
Access San Joaquin includes several programs designed to provide flexible options for increased mobility, particularly for rural areas, off-peak times, and passengers with mobility limitations.

Additionally, Access San Joaquin provides ADA eligibility screening on behalf of all member transit agencies. ADA-eligible passengers can then receive and use the Access Pass (identifying them as an ADAeligible passenger). Non-ADA seniors and disabled passengers can also apply for the Discount Fare Card through Access San Joaquin, which identifies them to all member transit agencies. This process has reduced the redundancy of screenings in the County. The programs operated by Access San Joaquin are described below:
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Assessment – An in-person eligibility assessment for services.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 28
• Travel Training – Helps seniors and disabled persons learn how to use public transit. • Discount Fare Cards – Offers eligible seniors, persons with disabilities, and Medicare cardholders the use of certain services for no more than one-half the regular base fare. • Access Pass – Free fare program allowing ADA-certified passengers to ride most fixed-route services free of charge.
• My Ride – A program that reimburses travel costs for ADA-certified passengers whose transportation needs are met by friends or family.

Van Go!
Van Go! is an app-based, on-demand, ADA-accessible, rideshare program available for those residing in underserved areas. Van Go! currently operates in all areas of San Joaquin County, except for trips completely within the City of Stockton. Van Go! provides dial-a-ride style trips for passengers, 7 days per week between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. The fare to ride is $4.00 per person for the first 5 miles of the trip and then $0.50 per mile after this.

Additional elements of the service include:
• Transfers are free to fixed-route bus service, excluding commuter buses. • Rural Pick Up allows you to travel anywhere within the RTD Van Go! service area. • Vehicles are accessible and can transport wheelchairs. Drivers are professionally trained, licensed, and prepared to help.
• Weekend & holiday service is available when other transportation services are closed. • As a ridesharing service, passengers are likely to share the van with other passengers in route to their destinations.

My Ride Volunteer Driver Program
Another opportunity for residents to increase mobility is the My Ride Volunteer Driver Program, offered by Access San Joaquin. This is a mileage reimbursement program to allow residents to arrange medical trips with friends or family. The passenger and driver both apply and sign waivers, and upon processing, the passenger is eligible to receive reimbursement for medical trips at the IRS mileage rate (currently $0.67/mile). The program covers trips to San Joaquin, Stanislaus County, and other contiguous counties to San Joaquin County. Currently, personal, medical-related, and essential travel trips within the program area are reimbursed.

DIBS
The DIBS (Demand-Induced Behavioral Strategies) program, offered by SJCOG, is a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management initiative designed to promote smart travel options. By encouraging carpooling, vanpooling, transit use, biking, and walking, DIBS aims to reduce traffic congestion, cut vehicle emissions, and improve air quality in the region4 . The DIBS program offers a
reimbursement of $400 a month per van to organize and provide vanpool services to others. 4 https://www.sjcog.org/626/Dibs---Smart-Travel?form=MG0AV3

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 29
American Legion Ripon Vets Serving Vets Van
The Ripon chapter of the American Legion offers a volunteer-driven ride program to current and former service members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their family members if they reside within San Joaquin County. The program owns and operates a 7-passenger wheelchair-capable van. The program will drive its passengers to doctor’s appointments, errands, grocery shopping, and, when pre-approved, to some social or recreational events.

Connections with Regional Transit Services
Blossom Express services connect with regional transit services, including SJRTD Route 91; however, a long wait time is required. Transfers to STANRTA Routes 22, 30, 31, 37, 48, the 70 ACE Commuter, and the 80 Stockton Commuter routes are available at the Vintage Faire Mall. The City of Escalon transit service, eTrans, connects to the Blossom Express at the Vintage Faire Mall and the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center.

PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION
While Ripon lacks direct access to private transportation providers, it is located in nearby communities as described below.

Greyhound
For Greyhound services, Ripon residents must travel to Modesto or Stockton. Greyhound operates an intercity bus service along State Route (SR) 99 as part of the route connecting Sacramento with Los Angeles. Two northbound and two southbound trips depart daily. One-way fares from Stockton to Sacramento range from $18 to $22, depending on the distance and type of passenger. One-way fares from Modesto to Sacramento range from $21 to $25, depending on the distance and type of passenger.

Passengers traveling from Ripon to Sacramento will need to transfer from the RTD Transit Center to the Greyhound Station in Stockton by taking RTD Routes 515, 510, 315, or 47.

Amtrak San Joaquins
There is no direct connection between the Blossom Express and an Amtrak station; however, passengers may connect to Amtrak services in Stockton or Modesto. The Amtrak San Joaquins route operates between the southern terminus of Bakersfield (with connecting bus service to Los Angeles) and the northern terminus of Sacramento. There are 6 southbound trips daily and six northbound trips daily.

Fares from Modesto to Bakersfield are approximately $27.00 one way, and fares to Sacramento are $13.00-$33.00. Passengers who wish to travel from Ripon to Sacramento or from Sacramento to Ripon through Stockton must transfer to SJRTD Route 91, travel to the SJRTD Transit Center, and then transfer to either Route 315 or 510 to reach the Amtrak station less than one mile away (0.8 miles). Those traveling to Sacramento through Modesto will have to transfer to the Vintage Faire Mall via StanRTA’s Route 25. As part of the Valley Rail Project, a new train station in Ripon will be built as part of the San Joaquin Amtrak rail route.

Legacy Limousine Service
Legacy Limousine Service offers private limousine services and general ride services, depending on availability. Services include luxury vehicles for special events and airport transportation to local, regional, and international airports. Services are available throughout San Joaquin, Sacramento, Stanislaus, Amador, Calaveras, and Merced Counties.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 30
Tuleen Limousine
Based out of Manteca, Tuleen Limousine offers town car and limousine services for special events and tours of the San Francisco Bay Area.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 31
Chapter 4

BLOSSOM EXPRESS PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS

INTRODUCTION
Public outreach and surveying are critical components of transportation planning initiatives. By engaging the community and gathering diverse input, planners can ensure that the transportation system meets the needs and preferences of all stakeholders. Effective public outreach fosters transparency, trust, and collaboration, leading to more inclusive and equitable solutions. Surveys provide valuable data on travel behaviors, preferences, and challenges, which can inform decision-making and help prioritize resources.

The following section provides an overview of the onboard passenger survey completed in November 2024, followed by preliminary Community Survey results gathered during December 2024.

BLOSSOM EXPRESSONBOARD PASSENGER SURVEY
LSC conducted onboard passenger surveys on board Blossom Express on November 12th and 14th, 2024.

Trained survey staff rode Blossom Express to distribute and collect surveys, as well as to assist passengers with taking the survey. The on-board survey timeframe covered the full range of operating hours on Tuesday and Thursday, which represents a complete week of Blossom Express service.

The survey instrument consisted of a one-page questionnaire printed on cardstock; the questions were presented in English on one side and Spanish on the reverse side. The survey included 12 multiplechoice and short-answer questions, as well as a write-in comment section. In all, 4 survey responses were received, 3 in English and 1 in Spanish. Over the survey period, 7 one-way trips were made by a total of 4 passengers, all of whom participated in the survey. A more detailed summary is included in Appendix B.

Key Findings
• Blossom Express is utilized by a diverse range of age groups, primarily for short trips to complete a singular errand.
• Most riders lack a feasible or cost-effective alternative means of transportation to Blossom Express.
• Information about Blossom Express services can be difficult to access, and most users depend on asking the driver for service information.
• Perceptions of Blossom Express services are very positive; there is room for improvement in service reliability, information accessibility, bus stop amenities, and improved regional connectivity with other regional transit service operators.

RIPONONLINE COMMUNITY SURVEY
The online community survey was launched in November 2024 and is still currently open. It contains a total of 28 questions focused on travel patterns, demographics, and general impressions of transportation within the region. To notify the community and encourage participation, the survey was sent to each regional stakeholder and featured in the monthly Ripon newsletter. As of the end of December, there are 23 responses. The following is a brief overview of the input received, with a more detailed analysis being provided in a future Tech Memo once the survey has closed.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 32
Key Findings
• About 78 percent of respondents (18 respondents) do not currently use Blossom Express. o Of the remaining five participants who use the service, two use it twice a year, two use it once a week, and one uses Blossom Express 2-5 times per year. • Web searching and asking staff for information were some of the most popular ways folks obtain information about transportation services.
• Recreational and social outings were the most popular trip purposes, followed by shopping. • Of those who indicated using other transportation services, ACE and Amtrak were the only ones frequented by survey participants.
• 85 percent of participants (17 respondents) replied that COVID-19 did not change their need for transportation.
• 80 percent of participants (16 respondents) had never heard of the Vamos App. • A majority (95 percent, 19 respondents) would use public transit for the Almond Blossom Festival.
• Almost half (45 percent, 9 respondents) indicated they would use public transit to get to and from local junior colleges. Of these responses, most indicated an interest in traveling to Modesto Junior College, followed by San Joaquin Delta College. • 78 percent agree that public transit is important to the City of Ripon.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 33
Chapter 5

RECENT TRANSIT OPERATIONS AND PERFORMANCE

INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, Blossom Express and Dial a Ride’s passenger trip data is analyzed, followed by vehicle service hours and miles. The chapter concludes with operational and financial histories as well as a performance assessment of Blossom Express as a whole.

BLOSSOM EXPRESS RIDERSHIP
Annual Ridership
Figure 8 shows Blossom Express ridership for FY 2018-19 through FY 2023-24. Much like other transit systems, the Blossom Express ridership was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Ridership decreased by 30 percent between FY 2018-19 and FY 2019-20 and decreased by another 60 percent during the pandemic. Compared to pre-pandemic (FY 2018-19), FY 2023-24 represents a 39 percent ridership decline; however, the ridership numbers have been consistent over the last three years.

Ridership by Month
Many transit systems experience seasonal fluctuations in ridership throughout the year. Figure 9 depicts Blossom Express’s monthly ridership by route for FY 2023-24. Systemwide monthly ridership was highest in April (91 passenger trips) and February (84 passenger trips), with slightly lower ridership in October and December (36 passenger trips each, respectively).

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 34
Boardings by Day of Week
The Blossom Express runs on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Figure 10 shows boardings by day of the week over the last three fiscal years (FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25 YTD). As illustrated, Tuesday has the greatest number of boardings by day of the week, with an average of 70 percent of all boardings year after year, whereas Thursday experiences closer to 30 percent of all passenger trips.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 35
Ridership by Type
The Blossom Express offers public transit service to all residents. Those who use the transit service the most include Bethany Home residents, seniors, or those with disabilities, and the general public (Figure 11). More than half (52 percent or 734 riders averaged for FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25 YTD) of riders were Bethany Home residents. Seniors or those with disabilities accounted for 22 percent or 318 riders, averaged for the past 3 complete fiscal years. Those who are students (6 percent or 91 riders) and those who are from the general public (19 percent or 276 riders) made up the smallest groups of Blossom Express riders for the last 3 fiscal years.

Boardings by Stop
Table 9 shows the weekly boarding activity recorded during LSC’s surveying period on November 12th and 14th in 2024. As shown, a total of 7 passenger-trips were recorded over the surveying time. Bethany Homes and the Vintage Faire Mall were the most frequently used stops during the observation period.

Based on the passenger trips recorded for FY 2023-24, the average daily ridership is 6.6 passenger trips per service day, indicating that the boarding and alightings recorded during the surveying period were less than the average.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 36
Table 9: Boarding and Alighting (Tuesday and Thursday)
Stops On Off
Ripon Library (Elm/Main)
Stockton/Main
Ripon Senior Center (Wilma/4th) 0 1
Vera (2nd/3rd)
Bethany Home Wilma/2nd 2 1
U.S. Post Office* 1275 W. Main Street 1 0
Town Square Apartments Main/Nikkel
Jack Tone/Canal
Save Mart (Colony Road) COURTESY STOP ONLY 1 1
W. Colony/Goodwin RTD: Route 91, 10:45 AM 1 0
W. Colony/Fulton
N. Ripon/Colony
N. Ripon/Boesch
E. Milgeo/John Roos
E. Milgeo/Azalea
N. Manley/Nevada
Stouffer Park/N. Manley
E. Main/Oak
Kaiser Permanente Hospital Dale, Modesto MAX: Route 28 1 Dale/Veneman, Modesto 1
Vintage Faire Mall, Modesto MAX Routes: 25, 30, 31, 36, 37, & 41 2 1 Applebee's @ Target Shopping Center Sisk/Vintage, Modesto Best Buy @ Target Shopping Center Sisk, Modesto
Ripon Library (Elm/Main) 1
Total 7 7
Total
Source: LSC Conducted Boarding and Alighting counts taken 11/12/2024 and 11/14/2024

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 37
Vehicle Service Miles and Hours
Similar to ridership, recent years have seen the Blossom Express service levels impacted by service interruptions due to the pandemic. In the last five years, service levels were highest in FY 2022-23 (Figure 12). During the pandemic FY 2019-20, Blossom Express operated 30 percent fewer vehicle service miles (VSM) and 29 percent fewer vehicle service hours (VSH). In FY 2023-24, service levels returned to pre-pandemic levels.

DIAL-A-RIDE RIDERSHIP
Annual Ridership
Figure 13 shows Blossom Express DAR ridership for FY 2019-20 through FY 2023-24. The highest year of DAR ridership was FY 2019-20, with 234 rides. Ridership plummeted during FY 2020-21 (28 rides) and did not rebound or increase, even after COVID-19. For the last 4 fiscal years, there has been an average of 26 rides per year.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 38
Ridership by Month
Many transit systems experience seasonal fluctuations in ridership throughout the year. Figure 14 depicts Blossom Express’s monthly ridership by route for FY 2023-24. Systemwide monthly ridership was highest in April, May, and February (6 DAR rides each), with 0 rides in 6 months of the last fiscal year (January, June, August, September, November, December).

Ridership by Type
DAR is a public transit service that is offered to the general public (Figure 15). The service had the highest ridership in FY 2019-2020, with 224 seniors, 9 disabled persons, and 1 youth rider using the service. After the rate of senior riders dropped, and the number of disabled persons increased for the next four fiscal years. The rate of youth stayed very low.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 39
Vehicle Service Miles and Hours
Vehicle Service Miles and Hours for DAR were highest in 2019-2020 (520 VSM and 90.6 VSH) and then decreased sharply in FY 2020-21. VSM and VSH have stayed fairly consistent over the last several fiscal years (Figure 16).

CITYOF RIPON TRANSIT SERVICES FINANCIAL REVIEW
The sustainability of transit services is dependent on the balance between revenues and costs. The City of Ripon’s final FY 2023-24 budget is reviewed in this section and then used to develop a cost model to analyze the transit performance of its service.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 40
Operating Expenses for Blossom Express
Blossom Express operating expenses (not including DAR) totaled approximately $72,190 in FY 2023-24 (Table 10). This represents a 46 percent increase over FY 2022-23, in part due to high rates of inflation experienced in recent years and increases in contractor costs.

The top annual expense for Blossom Express is the SJRTD contracted driver services, which represent nearly 38 percent of the annual operating budget. It should be noted that the contract increased by 49 percent over the previous fiscal year. Vehicle maintenance and repair made up 21 percent of operating expenses, which represents a 249 percent increase over FY 2022-23. Salaries and labor of City of Ripon staff made up 14 percent of FY 2023-24 operating expenses.

Revenue Sources
The City of Ripon’s transit operating revenues stem from a few different sources (Table 11). Major revenue sources include their SJCOG allotment of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local Transportation Funds (LTF) (the statewide sales tax), and Measure K (local sales tax) funding. Recently, the City was re-classified as a Rural Urbanized Area as part of the latest census. With this, the City now receives FTA 5311 funds. However, since this funding source requires a 50 percent match, the City has not been able to fully allocate this revenue, resulting in the deferral of funding to RTD and Escalon.

In the past, Blossom Express operations were primarily funded with Measure K funds. Recently, SJCOG required that 25 percent of LTF funds provided to the local jurisdictions be spent on public transit.

Therefore, beginning in FY 2023-24, a much larger amount of revenue is now available for public transit uses. In FY 23-24, Blossom Express received $172,608 in LTF funds as part of the SJCOG allotment; however, this amount will decrease to around $200,000 annually going forward.

Since the City was moved to the Rural Urbanized Area as part of the last census, the City now receives FTA 5311 funds. This funding source requires a 50 percent match from the City. For the first couple of years of receiving these funds, the City has not been able to fully allocate, resulting in deferring the funds to RTD and Escalon.

Expenses FY 2023-24
Salaries & Benefits $10,407
Professional & Specialized Services $750
Contract Services (RTD Contracted Service) $27,280
Fuel $8,753
Vehicle Insurance $10,103
Vehicle Maintenance & Repair $14,834
Office Supplies/Advertising/Legal Etc. $63
Total $72,190
Source: City of Ripon Final and Adopted Budgets 2022/23 - 2024/25 Table 10: FY 2023-24 Blossom Express Operating Expenses

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 41
Cost Allocation
A cost model was developed for the Blossom Express fixed route as a way to better evaluate the cost efficiency of fixed route services in the City of Ripon (Table 11). To develop a cost model, each Blossom Express operating expense was allocated to the service quantity (VSH or VSM) upon which it is most dependent. The costs not dependent on service levels, such as auditor services or legal counsel, were designated as fixed costs. The model divided the sum of these costs allocated to VSH and VSM by the respective annual service quantity level for FY 2023-24.

FY 2023-24 Blossom Express Operating Cost Model =
$60.62 x annual vehicle service hours + $3.50 x annual vehicle service miles + $17,021 in fixed costs Revenue FY 2023-24
Farebox Revenue $908
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) SJCOG Allotment $172,608
Measure K $70,461
Bethany Home Rent $1,000
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5311 $0
Interest $14,277
Total Revenues $259,254
Source: City of Ripon Final and Adopted Budgets 2022/23 - 2024/25 Note 1: The total LTF funds allocated to the City is $690,433. Since the City of Ripon population is below 25,000 residents, the City is required to allocate a minimum of 25% for transit purposes. The remaining amount could be used either for transit or street and road maintenance.

Table 11: FY 2023-24 Blossom Express Operating Revenues Table 12: Blossom Express FY 2023-24 Cost Model
Expense Category FY 23-24 Hour Mile Fixed
Salaries & Benefits $10,392 $4,287 $6,105
Professional & Specialized Services $750 $750
Contract Services (RTD Contracted Service) $27,280 $27,280 Fuel $8,753 $8,753
Vehicle Insurance $10,103 $10,103
Vehicle Maintenance & Repair $14,834 $14,834
Office Supplies/Advertising/Legal Etc. $63 $63
Total $72,175 $27,280 $27,874 $17,021
Annual Service Quantity 450 7,974 --
Cost per Unit by Variable (Cost Model) $60.62 $3.50 $17,021 Source: City of Ripon
Variable
Note 1: Total costs are based on approved values for FY 2023-24.

Note 2: Annual service quantities based on FY 2023-24.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 42

BLOSSOM EXPRESS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
For the period of FY 2023-24, the cost model was applied to operations data to calculate standard performance metrics such as passenger-trips per hour and subsidy per passenger-trip. This analysis will help to identify potential changes to Blossom Express transit service to be analyzed as part of the next phase of the study. The service parameters used in the performance analysis are summarized in Table

13. Passenger-Trips per Hour
The relative productivity of transit service can be assessed by calculating the average number of passenger-trips completed per vehicle service hour. Based on this metric and background data collected from Ripon, Blossom Express averaged 1.9 passenger-trips over the last six fiscal years. The year with the highest passenger-trips per hour was FY 2019-20, at 2.5 passenger-trips. The year with the lowest passenger-trips per hour was FY 2020-21 (0.8 passenger-trips). The most current year (FY 2023-24) was

1.5 passenger-trips per hour.

Passenger-Trips per Mile
The number of passenger-trips carried per vehicle service mile is another indicator of transit productivity. Low mileage services tend to carry more passenger-trips per mile compared to high mileage services. On average, the Blossom Express carried 0.09 passengers per mile in FY 2023-24.

Historically, FY 2019-20 had the greatest number of passengers per mile (0.14 passengers per mile). The lowest number of passenger-trips per mile was FY 2020-21, with 0.05 passengers per mile.

Total Operating Cost per Passenger-Trip
Operating cost per passenger-trip includes not only direct operating costs such as driver salaries and fuel, but also the other fixed costs included in Table 10, such as marketing, computer supplies, legal counsel, etc. Fixed costs are allocated to each route based on the proportion of the total systemwide vehicle service hours operated by said service. Systemwide, the operating cost per passenger-trip in FY 2023-24 was $105.37.

Table 13: Blossom Express Parameters and Performance FY 2023-24 Fiscal Year
PassengerTrips
FY 2023-24 685 450 7,974 $72,175 $55,154 $921
Fiscal Year Hour Mile
FY 2023-24 1.5 0.09 $105.37 $104.02 $160.39 1.3%
Blossom Express Service Parameters
Service
Hours
Service
Miles
Fully Allocated
Operating Cost
Marginal
Operating Cost
1 Fare
Revenue
Blossom Express Service Performance
Passengers per… Total Operating
Cost per
Passenger-Trip
Total
Operating
Subsidy per
Passenger-Trip
Total Operating
Cost per
Service Hour
Farebox
Ratio 2
Sources: City of Ripon, LSC
Note 1: Marginal operating costs do not include fixed costs.

Note 2: Farebox calculations do not represent official calculations for TDA eligibility.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 43
Total Operating Subsidy per Passenger-Trip
The operating subsidy (operating costs minus fare revenue) per passenger-trip represents the amount of taxpayer subsidy per passenger-trip required to operate the transit system and is an excellent measure of cost efficiency. As annual fares are quite low for the service, the operating subsidy is nearly the same as the full operating cost at $104.02 per passenger-trip in FY 2023-24.

Total Operating Cost per Hour
Another metric traditionally monitored by transit agencies is the total operating cost per vehicle service hour. Total operating costs per hour for FY 2023-24 were $160.39 per service hour.

Farebox Ratio
The farebox ratio represents the proportion of operating costs paid for by fare revenues. The Blossom Express received $921 in passenger fare revenue in FY 2023-24. This equates to a 1.3 percent farebox ratio. This farebox ratio figure does not reflect the official calculation of farebox ratio for TDA eligibility purposes. That calculation incorporates local support revenue, such as Measure K, and is conducted by the fiscal auditor.

DIAL-A-RIDE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
As discussed in earlier Chapter 3, the current Dial-A-Ride (DAR) service is not advertised widely.

Therefore, ridership is quite low (30 passenger trips in FY 2023-24). Bethany Homes rents the vehicle from the City, and the City pays for maintenance and fuel for this vehicle. The City maintains a separate operating budget for the DAR service. The following discusses the performance of the DAR service for FY 2023-24 as shown in Tables 14 and 15:
• 0.17 passenger trips per vehicle mile.
• 1.2 passenger trips per vehicle hour.
• The expense for running DAR in FY 2023-24 was $2,478. • The Cost per Passenger Trip was $96.80.
• Cost per Passenger Hour was $112.95.
• Although the DAR flyer indicates a fare of $15 per trip within a 15-mile radius, no fare revenue was recorded for FY 2023-24.

Table 14: Historical Dial-a-Ride Operational Characteristics FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24
Vehicle Service Miles 520 214 168 110 180
Fare Revenue 0 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Service Hours 90.56 57.8 21.98 13.83 25.71

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 44

CONCLUSION
In summary, the City of Ripon operates a very small essential fixed route service to several hundred residents every year within a very small budget. With its limited days of operation, it may not meet the needs of those needing to travel outside of Tuesdays and Thursdays. The performance analysis indicated that productivity or passenger-trips per hour is low for a fixed route system. Additionally, cost efficiency (operating cost per trip) is high compared to fixed route services. On-board and community surveys (preliminary results) distributed as part of this effort indicate that passengers would like to see increased transit services to local junior colleges and the annual Almond Blossom Festival. Participants also mentioned that they would like to see more information about the current services being offered in the region.

The Dial-A-Ride service is not well-known. Although DAR has the potential to help meet the needs of passengers needing to travel longer distances, it does not appear to be used in that manner. Only a small amount of City funds is dedicated to this program. In the forthcoming Alternatives Tech Memo, ways in which to increase ridership and cost-effectiveness for both services will be explored.

Table 15: FY 2023-24 Dial-a-Ride Performance Measures
PassengerTrips Service HoursService
Miles
Fully
Allocated
Operating
Cost
Fare
Revenue
Operating Data 30 25.71 180 $2,904 $ -
PassengerTrips per hourPassenger
Trips per Mile
Cost per
Hour Cost per Trip
Performance Indicator 1.2 0.17 $112.95 $96.80

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 45
Chapter 6

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STANDARDS

INTRODUCTION
Transportation goals, objectives, and standards are essential in shaping a short-range transit plan that effectively meets community needs. Goals provide a broad vision, ensuring transit services align with regional mobility, equity, and sustainability priorities. Objectives break down these goals into actionable steps, guiding decisions on service improvements, accessibility, and efficiency. Standards establish measurable benchmarks, such as on-time performance, rider satisfaction, and coverage, ensuring accountability and consistency. Together, these elements create a strategic framework for responsive, equitable, and reliable transit service.

RECOMMENDED GOALS,OBJECTIVES, AND STANDARDS
In the previous SRTP, various goals, objectives, and standards were described in the context of considering a possible fixed route service in the City of Ripon. The following provides suggested performance goals and standards for Blossom Express to continue improving mobility.

Planning and Management Goal:

To evaluate strategies that help management maximize productivity while meeting the transit needs of the community and to develop a transit program that supports environmental and economic goals in the service area.

Planning Standard – The SRTP shall be updated at a minimum of every 10 years.

Service Monitoring Standard – Monitoring reports on the effectiveness and efficiency of transit service will be collected and reviewed monthly. These reports will include information on ridership, operating costs, status of bus stop amenities, and capital programs.

Land Use Planning Standard – The local transit staff will review development proposals within the City of Ripon to identify the effects of development on transit service and to ensure site plans and amenities are compatible with the transit program.

Service Effectiveness Goal:

To maximize the ridership potential of transit services.

Fixed-Route Effectiveness Standard – On an average annual basis, serve a minimum of 1.5 oneway passenger-trips per vehicle service hour for services that have been in place for three or more years.

Marketing Standard – Conduct marketing efforts to ensure that all service area residents are aware of area transit services. Conduct targeted marketing efforts for high-potential groups, including the elderly, disabled, students, low-income, transit-dependent residents, and commuters. Provide a schedule and marketing poster in Spanish. Marketing costs should be equivalent to at least 3 percent of the total transit annual budget.

Regional Connectivity Standard – Efforts shall be made to provide convenient connections to other public transit services in the region, providing connecting services to Manteca, Modesto, and other regional communities.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 46
Operating Cost Per Hour Control Standard – As an SRTP has not been completed since the implementation of the Blossom Express, a reasonable standard is to use existing performance (baseline FY 2023-24 = $160.39) and increase for inflation annually.

Operating Cost Per Passenger Trip Control Standard – Similar to the cost per hour, the cost per passenger trip standard is recommended at the current performance of $105.37, adjusted for inflation annually.

Marginal Operating Cost per Trip Standard – When evaluating the relative performance of service alternatives, it is important to look at the marginal operating cost per trip. This performance indicator excludes fixed costs such as utilities or administrative staff salaries. For example, if the transit service is increased to operate more hours during the day, these fixed costs will not increase, but driver hours and fuel will increase. Blossom Express’s baseline marginal cost per trip for FY 2023-24 is $95.27.

As with all performance standards related to cost, this should be increased annually at the rate of growth of the Consumer Price Index.

Service Quality Goal:

To provide safe, reliable, and convenient public transit services.

On-Time Performance Standard – 90 percent of all fixed-route trips should be operated on time, except when travel is unduly impeded by traffic or weather conditions. On-time is defined as not early, and not more than five minutes late.

Passenger Amenity Standard – Shelter should be considered at all bus stops serving 15 or more passenger boardings per day. Seating should be considered at all bus stops serving 10 or more passenger boardings per day. Benches and shelters will only be installed in existing state or County rightof-way, except where written confirmation from the property owner can be obtained to install a bench or shelter on private property. On an annual basis, the City Engineer will identify potential sites and prepare an installation priority list. Currently, there are no stops exceeding these ridership levels.

Passenger Load Standard – For passenger safety and comfort, vehicles should be sized and the transit service operated to require standees on no more than 10 percent of the runs for any route, and to avoid any recurring loads of more than 150 percent of the seated capacity.

Accident Standard – Maintain a minimum of 100,000 miles traveled between preventable collision accidents.

Maintenance Standard – Maintain a minimum of 40,000 miles between road calls. Road calls are defined as any time passenger service is interrupted for more than five minutes due to a mechanical failure (except for flat tires).

Vehicle Cleanliness Standard – The exterior of each vehicle used in service will be washed twice weekly, and the interior will be swept daily and detailed at least weekly. Vehicle detailing includes mopping the floor, washing the windows, and removing any minor stains that may have accumulated on the passenger seats. A vehicle that experiences a major stain will be removed from service as soon as possible and cleaned/repaired before re-entering service.

Training Standard – All services shall be provided by trained, courteous, respectful employees who appreciate the needs of the passengers. Each driver shall have a minimum of eight hours annually of ongoing driver training.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 47
The following data categories are recommended for careful supervision of services, which should be collected on a regular, ongoing basis:
• Passenger Boarding/Alighting – Though the daily recording of passenger activity by the drivers can seem burdensome, this information is vital in tracking ridership by stop and assuring the various funding agencies that their dollars are providing a benefit to their constituents. • On-time Performance – Comprehensive records of on-time performance are useful in determining proper scheduling and ensuring quality service. • Missed Passengers – Drivers should radio to the dispatcher the number of passengers who must be left on the curb due to full vehicle loads. As a critical determinant of overall service quality, the number and location of missed passengers should be carefully tracked. • Annual Passenger Survey – Onboard surveys are a vital source of planning information regarding the ridership and the purpose of their trip-making. In addition, surveys are the single best way to gain “feedback” regarding the service. Funding for annual onboard surveys should be a priority.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 48
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 49
Chapter 7

SERVICE ALTERNATIVES

INTRODUCTION
A successful transit system significantly influences economic vitality, environmental sustainability, and overall quality of life. This chapter delves into a comprehensive analysis of potential changes to both Blossom Express fixed route and Dial-A-Ride transit services. The chapter begins by looking at ways in which to possibly expand existing services. Improving Blossom Express service efficiency, frequency, and schedule span is then explored. The chapter concludes by looking into the larger regional transit network and how to improve connectivity between Ripon and nearby major urban areas.

For each alternative, the impacts on ridership and operating costs are estimated. Ridership and cost estimates assume implementation in FY 2025-26 and are based on the following parameters:
• The City of Ripon Transit Budget FY 2024/25 operating budget was increased by 3 percent for inflation and was used to estimate the operating costs of Blossom Express and Dial a Ride, assuming no change to service levels (“status quo” scenario) in FY 2025/26. The per-hour and per-mile costs were then used to estimate the cost impacts of the various alternatives, per the following equation:
o Change in Marginal Operating Cost = $77.82 X Change in Vehicle Service Hours + $5.21 X Change in Vehicle Service Miles
• For the alternatives evaluations which follow, operating cost estimates represent “marginal” costs. In other words, fixed costs are excluded from the analysis unless identified specifically.

The reason for looking at the marginal costs of potential changes or improvements is that fixed costs (such as administrative staff salaries, utilities, and supplies) will not change if service levels are increased or decreased. However, fuel/maintenance costs (cost per mile) and driver salary costs (costs per hour) will increase incrementally as vehicle hours and miles are increased. Fixed costs and capital costs will be included in the discussion when the Draft Financial Plan is prepared.
• Status quo ridership estimates assume an average increase in ridership of 3 percent from FY 2023-24 levels. This is consistent with post-pandemic trends. Ridership estimates for service alternatives are based on ridership data from peer systems and standard transit demand elasticity factors, depending on the alternative. Elasticity is an economic term which measures the change in the behavior of one variable in response to the change in a related variable. For example, if service levels are doubled, historical data from transit services in similar areas has shown that ridership will not double but rather increase by around 47 percent. Elasticity factors vary for different variables such as headways, total travel time, or transfer time. Variation has also been found in urban areas vs. suburban areas or during peak or non-peak periods. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 95 Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes Chapter 9 – Transit Scheduling and Frequency is a good resource for transit elasticity factors.
• Service was assumed to include the status quo of 104 service days (Tuesdays and Thursdays), unless otherwise noted.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 50
• The assumed average cash fares received per boarding are based on FY 2023-24 data. The average cash fare values were calculated by allocating the total annual cash fare revenue received on Blossom Express and Dial a Ride, and allocated to each route based on the proportion of ridership. This equates to a fixed route average fare paid of $1.31 for Blossom Express fixed route services.

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Expanding transportation service span options is crucial for meeting the diverse needs of commuters, especially those who work irregular hours or rely on transit during off-peak times. By exploring and implementing various schedules, transit authorities can ensure that services are more inclusive and accessible, catering to early morning and late-night travelers. This approach not only improves the convenience and reliability of public transit but also supports equitable mobility by accommodating the varying lifestyles and work patterns of the community. In essence, a well-thought-out service span can significantly enhance the overall efficiency and usability of the transit system. The following includes an overview of various service span alternatives as well as an analysis to provide a clearer understanding of the costs of implementation. Findings for each possible transit alternative are presented in Table 16, with a performance analysis shown in Table 17
Extend Existing Service Hours 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM
Current Blossom Express hours are between 9:30 AM and 2:30 PM, which includes four round trips from Ripon to Modesto on Tuesdays and Thursdays. While this may accommodate mid-day trips for current passengers, it was expressed during public surveys and stakeholder interviews that earlier morning and later afternoon service would better accommodate the needs of the community. Additionally, during our stakeholder outreach, Bethany Homes expressed that their clients would appreciate a longer span of service to accommodate more errands in combination with a recreational or medical trip to Modesto and back. With this in mind, adding two additional service hours to the existing service day was evaluated. The following provides a summary of costs, projected ridership, and possible fare revenues. • Extending service on Tuesdays and Thursdays would increase existing marginal costs by $34,100 per year.
• Adding hours of service could result in an increase of 77 passenger trips per year and approximately $100 in fare revenues.
• Providing this additional service would cost $441.62 per passenger trip.

Providing Blossom Express on Wednesdays or Fridays
Community surveying and stakeholder outreach indicated adding another weekday of service would allow residents to take advantage of more social and recreational programming in the area while providing more opportunities to go to Modesto for shopping and/or medical appointments. Tables 16 and 17 present the possible alternative of providing another weekday of Blossom Express service on either Wednesday or Friday during the current service schedule (9:30 AM to 3:30 PM), as well as an expanded day of service (8:30 AM to 4:30 PM).

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 51
Table 16: Blossom Express Service Alternatives Analysis Hours Miles Runs Hours Miles Hours Miles
Status Quo 446.25 8389.5
Blossom Express Fixed Route 1.00 18.8 4.25 4.25 79.9 105 450 7,974 $61,700 706 $921 $60,779 Dial-a-Ride -- -- -- -- -- 258 7 180 $1,200 31 $1,200
Total 457 8,154 $62,900 736 $921 $61,979
-450 $30,500 $30,000
Extend Service by 2 hours (Tues/Thurs)
8:30 AM to 3:30 PM 1.00 18.8 2 2.00 37.6 105 210 3,948 $29,800 180 $200 $29,600 One Additional Weekday Service (Wed)
Existing Service Span (9:30 AM-2:30 PM) Wed.

Net Impact 1.00 18.8 4.25 4.3 79.9 51 217 4,075 $30,800 150 $200 $30,600 Extended Service Span Tues., Wed., & Thurs. (8:30 AM - 3:30 PM) Net Impact 529 9,941 $75,100 400 $500 $74,600
Expand Service to 5 Days a Week
Existing Service Span (9:00 AM-2:30 PM) 1 18.8 4.25 79.9 255 0 20,375 $92,100 Net Impact -450 12,401 $30,500 380 $500 $30,000
Extended Service Span (8:30 AM to 3:30 PM) 1 18.8 6.25 6.3 117.5 255 1,594 29,963 $226,200 Net Impact 1,144 21,989 $164,600 590 $800 $163,800
Full Service Day (8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) 1 18.8 7.25 7.3 136.3 255 1,849 34,757 $262,400 Net Impact 1,399 26,783 $200,800 690 $900 $199,900
Weekend Services
Saturday Service 2 Round Trips 1.00 18.8 2 3 37.6 51 153 1,918 $17,400 100 $131 $17,269 Special Event Shuttle
Special Event Shuttle Services 2x per year 5 64 3 15 192 $1,700 450 $590 $1,110 Evening Microtransit Service (1)
Friday and Saturday Microtransit (5:00 PM - 9:00 PM) 4 102 408 902 $43,300 820 $3,280 $40,020 Thursday Microtransit to Farmer's Market (5:00 PM - 8:00 PM) 60 $4,890 120 $480 $4,410 Service to All City of Ripon
Expand Deviation Area to All of City of Ripon - - 102 0 9 $46 9 $0 $50 Deviated Service to SJVC
By Request Service to SJVC (Salida) 0.08 0.6 2 0.2 2.4 51 10.2 122 $1,100 20 $30 $1,100 Note 1: Includes annual technology costs.

Estimated FY 2025-26
Annual Marginal
Cost Fare Revenues
Marginal
Operating
Subsidy
Run Parameters Daily Service Days per
Year
Annual Annual
Ridership

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 52
• With the current scheduled service span (9:30 AM to 3:30 PM), providing another day of Blossom Express service would result in an operating cost of $86,100 annually. With an extended schedule of two additional service hours, the service would cost $106,300 annually. • Passenger trips would increase by between 147 and 225 trips annually, depending on which length of service the additional weekday would be provided. • This alternative would also result in high costs per passenger trip (between $586.38 and $474.58 per trip).

Add Saturday Service
Expanding public transit service to include Saturdays can greatly enhance accessibility and convenience for various communities. Many people rely on public transportation for essential activities such as shopping, attending medical appointments, and/or participating in social activities. By offering Saturday service, transit systems can better support those with non-traditional schedules or limited transportation options. Respondents to the community survey requested Saturday service. If Blossom Express operated on Saturday service from 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM (two round-trips), it would result in an additional cost of $16,300 annually. A review of Saturday ridership as compared to weekday ridership for small community transit systems shows that Saturday ridership represents roughly five percent of ridership for the week. Applying this factor to Blossom Express equates to an increase of only 34 passenger-trips per year with the addition of Saturday service.

Table 17: Blossom Express Service Alternatives Performance Analysis Ridership
Vehicle
Hours
Marginal
Operatin
g Costs
Marginal
Operatin
g Subsidy
Psgr-Trips
per ServiceHour
Marginal
Cost per
Psgr-Trip
Recommended Performance Standard 1.50 $85.42
Extend Service by 2 hours (Tues/Thurs)
8:30 AM to 3:30 PM 180 210 $29,800 $29,600 0.9 $165.56
One Additional Weekday Service (Wed)
Net Impact 150 217 $30,800 $30,600 0.7 $205.33
Net Impact 400 529 $75,100 $74,600 0.8 $187.75
Expand Service to 5 Days a Week
Existing Service Span (9:00 AM-2:30 PM) 380 -450 $30,500 $30,000 -0.8 $80.26 Extended Service Span (8:30 AM to 3:30 PM) 590 1,144 $164,600 $163,800 0.5 $278.98 Full Service Day (8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) 690 1,399 $200,800 $199,900 0.5 $291.01 Weekend Services
Saturday Service 2 Round Trips 100 153 $17,400 $17,269 0.7 $174.00 Special Event Shuttle
Special Event Shuttle Services 2x per year 450 15 $1,700 $1,110 30.0 $3.78 Evening Microtransit Service (1)
Friday and Saturday Microtransit (5:00 PM - 9:00 PM) 820 408 $43,300 $40,020 2.0 $52.80 Thursday Microtransit to Farmer's Market (5:00 PM - 8:00 PM) 120 60 $4,890 2.0 $40.75 Deviated Service to SJVC
By Request Service to SJVC (Salida) 20 10 $1,100 $1,100 2.0 $55.00 Indicates Alternative Meets Standard
Change From Existing Service (Annual)

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 53
Special Event Services
Special event public transit services are vital for managing transportation needs during high-demand occasions such as festivals, concerts, sporting events, and parades. By providing targeted transit services, cities can ensure smoother travel for attendees while reducing traffic congestion and allowing for a more enjoyable experience for all. Special event transit options also foster accessibility and inclusivity, allowing individuals without private transportation to participate in community events. In particular, the community indicated a desire to have public transit to the Almond Blossom Festival and the Fourth of July Fireworks event hosted at the Mistlin Sports Complex north of Ripon.

One potential issue with Special Events transportation is the federal regulations regarding Charter Service. The FTA has specific regulations in place governing the provision of Charter Service, and it is important to understand these regulations in context of providing Special Event transportation. If the Special Event transportation is determined to be Charter Service, the service must be advertised to private industry operators so that they may bid to provide the service, and the process generally becomes too cumbersome for small transit systems to administer. The intent is to disallow an unfair advantage to the publicly subsidized transit system in providing the service.

The FTA definition of Charter Service is as follows:
“‘Charter service’ means, but does not include demand response service to individuals:
• Transportation provided by a recipient at the request of a third party for the exclusive use of a bus or van for a negotiated price. The following features may be characteristic of charter service:
o A third party pays the transit provider a negotiated price for the group; o Any fares charged to individual members of the group are collected by a third party; o The service is not part of the transit provider’s regularly scheduled service, or is offered for a limited period of time; or
o A third party determines the origin and destination of the trip, as well as scheduling; or • Transportation provided by a recipient to the public for events or functions that occur on an irregular basis or for a limited duration, and:
o A premium fare is charged that is greater than the usual or customary fixed-route fare; or o The service is paid for in whole or in part by a third party.” In the City of Ripon, for example, if a third party were conducting an event at the Mistlin Sports Complex and wished to financially support the City-operated shuttle service to the field, the service would be considered a charter service. However, if the City of Ripon wished to provide shuttle service for free or regular fare, this would not be considered Charter Service.

Therefore, under this alternative, the City of Ripon would provide half-hourly transportation between special events at the Mistlin Sports Complex and the Ripon High School parking lot located on Acacia Ave. for a total of five hours. The cost of this service is estimated to be $77.82 per hour of service operated. If service were provided for a total of five hours per event day, for three full event days, the annual cost would be $2,200, with an estimated ridership of 450 passengers. For planning purposes, the City of Ripon should determine how many events it would like to serve with transportation and provide a maximum dollar amount in the budget for such events.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 54
Coordination with Regional Transit Operators
As a part of the regional transit network, it is essential to consider the possible connections between Blossom Express and other transit providers. As shown in Table 18, while there are possible connections between services, many only function well in one direction, meaning passengers are unable to get back to Ripon very easily without very long wait times, if at all. The following provides an overview of current connections and concludes with possible solutions.

San Joaquin RTD Route 91
The Blossom Express and San Joaquin’s RTD Route 91 share two stops within the City of Ripon. While there are limited opportunities for those riding Route 91 to transfer to Blossom Express and continue southbound towards Modesto, there are currently no connecting services for passengers in Ripon to connect with Route 91 running northbound to Manteca.

The only option for folks in Ripon to currently make a trip to Manteca is by booking a ride through San Joaquin’s Van Go! program. Having to plan a trip and book it ahead of time, as opposed to having a regularly scheduled trip north, is the major disadvantage of not having a reliable fixed route service northbound to Manteca. However, for some, Van Go! is more convenient due to its curb-to-curb service and the ability to reserve a trip ahead of time.

The “S” in Modesto
Blossom Express connects to S routes at three major stops in Modesto: Kaiser Permanente, Village Faire Mall, and Target. As shown in Table 18, there are several connections for Blossom Express passengers to transfer to and from S routes at the Village Faire Mall, with wait times as little as 5 and 10 minutes.

Transfer wait times are longer at the Kaiser Permanente and Target stops, but are still reasonable, with the longest wait time under 30 minutes to connect northbound to Blossom Express.

Service to New Areas
Additional Areas Within the City of Ripon
Expanding Blossom Express services to new areas of Ripon was requested in the community survey; however, it appeared that many of these requests were already within the 3/4-mile deviation area (Figure 16). As shown, almost all of Ripon is currently being served by Blossom Express. As illustrated, the only area currently unserved by Blossom Express is the farthest southwest portion of the city. As the unserved areas of Ripon are quite small, a possible alternative would be to provide deviated Blossom Express services to anywhere within the City of Ripon boundaries. As shown in Table 16, the costs of providing this service are nominal and would be worth simplifying the service as currently provided.

Manteca
During discussions with current stakeholders, it was mentioned that trips to Manteca would be helpful for some of their clients to run errands. While Manteca is a little closer to Ripon than Modesto, by only a few miles, there is no major medical center like Kaiser. There are similar grocery stores, such as Target and Trader Joe's; however, these same shopping destinations are being served along the current Blossom Express Modesto route.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 55
City Major Bus Stop Transit Service/Route
Blossom Express (SB to Modesto) 9:44 AM 10:44 AM 12:34 PM 1:34 PM SJ RTD Route 91 (NB to Manteca) - - 12:05 PM - 3:10 PM 7:40 PM Blossom Express (SB to Modesto) 9:30 AM 10:30 AM 12:20 PM 1:20 PM SJ RTD Route 91 (NB to Manteca) 9:05 AM - 12:15 PM - 3:20 PM 7:50 PM Blossom Express (SB to Modesto) 10:01 AM 11:01 AM 12:51 PM 1:55 PM The S Route 48 9:20 AM 10:20 AM 11:12 AM 12:24 PM 1:19 PM 2:24 PM 3:18 PM Blossom Express (SB to Modesto) 10:10 AM 11:10 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM The S Route 22 10:10 AM 10:30 AM 11:10 AM 11:30 AM 11:50 AM 12:10 PM 12:30 PM 12:50 PM 1:10 PM 1:30 PM 1:50 PM 2:10 PM The S Route 25 10:15 AM 10:45 AM 11:15 AM 11:45 AM 12:15 PM 12:45 PM 1:15 PM 1:45 PM 2:15 PM 2:45 PM 3:15 PM The S Route 30 9:35 AM 10:05 AM 10:35 AM 11:35 AM 12:05 PM 12:35 PM 1:05 PM 1:35 PM 2:05 PM 2:35 PM 3:05 PM The S Route 31 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 1:00 PM 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM 3:00 PM The S Route 37 10:13 AM 10:43 AM 11:13 AM 11:43 AM 12:13 PM 12:43 PM 1:13 PM 1:43 PM 2:13 PM 2:43 PM 3:13 PM The S Route 48 10:25 AM 11:17 AM 12:24 PM 1:24 PM 2:24 PM 3:25 PM The S Route 80 NB 10:42 AM
The S Route 80 SB 12:15 PM
The S Route 90 WB 10:00 AM
The S Route 90 EB 12:45 PM
Blossom Express (SB to Modesto) 10:15 AM 11:15 AM 1:05 PM 2:05 PM The S Route 31 10:05 AM 10:35 AM 11:05 AM 11:35 AM 12:05 PM 12:35 PM 1:05 PM 1:35 PM 2:05 PM 2:35 PM 3:05 PM Source: Current Blossom Express and RTD Route Schedules, Website.

Within 15 Minutes of Connecting.

Between 16 and 30 minutes of Connecting.

Table 18: Blossom Express Regional Connections

CITY OF RIPON

MODESTO
Colony and Goodwin
(Save Mart)
Wilma and 4th
(Senior Center)
Dale
(Kaiser Permanente)
Village Faire
Target
Current Schedule

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 56
Furthermore, public transit is currently being provided by the San Joaquin Regional Transportation District (SJRTD) Route 91 between Ripon and Manteca. Ripon passengers may take Route 91 from Ripon at 8:55 AM, 12:05 PM, and 3:10 PM, with return trips from Manteca to Ripon at 12:13 PM, 3:19 PM, and 7:48 PM. In addition, a Ripon resident may schedule a Van Go ride from Ripon to Manteca and back if they need curb-to-curb service. For these reasons, a specific Blossom Express Manteca route was not fully evaluated in an effort to avoid duplication of existing services Deviations and Dial-A-Ride
As demonstrated in Chapter 3, the Dial-A-Ride service historically had more ridership than in recent years. This has been due in part to Bethany Homes beginning to provide more private, in-house trips for their residents, who were previously the majority of passengers using Dial-A-Ride. During the community outreach and passenger surveys conducted as part of this study, there was a clear indication that people are currently unaware of transportation services being provided in Ripon, including Dial-ARide and the option for ¾ mile deviations from the fixed route. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City focus its efforts on adding a part-time driver to provide more consistent service. With more consistent driver presence, the City can begin marketing the Dial-A-Ride services currently being provided. A more detailed discussion of staff time needed to increase marketing efforts is included under Chapter 6.

Microtransit
Microtransit is a relatively new form of demand-response public transit. Through the use of technology and phone apps, it is possible for a passenger to request a ride “on-demand” within certain areas and at certain times. The benefit of microtransit is that it is not limited to a set route with set stops, but rather, passengers can be picked up at their curb and dropped off at the curb of their destination. This allows homes on the outlying edges of neighborhoods to be served more directly. The disadvantage of microtransit is that if there is high demand for service, there could be a 30-minute or longer wait for a ride. Passengers who depend on public transit to travel to work or make appointments at specific times may find microtransit less convenient.

Microtransit has been successful in areas that are not easily served by a fixed route, low-productivity fixed routes, or during the evenings and weekends, when there is less demand. Two potential microtransit options for the City of Ripon would be to operate services within the city limits between 5:00 PM and 9:00 PM on Friday and Saturday, and between 5:00 PM and 8:00 PM on Thursday to accommodate the Farmers Market between May and September. Van Go! Currently, San Joaquin RTD’s microtransit service is not available during these evening hours. These new services would allow Ripon residents to go out to dinner or visit friends outside the hours of the Blossom Express or Van Go! services.

One van would be required to operate this service while still providing a wait time of around 30 minutes.

The program should first be implemented as a 2 to 3-year pilot program. As the City does not currently have a small demand response type vehicle or driver, a good option for the City of Ripon would be to amend the contract with San Joaquin RTD to provide evening microtransit. Another option would be to circulate a Request for Proposal for a turnkey operation. In total, it is estimated that microtransit service on Friday and Saturday nights would cost on the order of $43,300, with Thursday service costing $4,890 annually.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 57
When reviewing other microtransit systems in the Central Valley, it is reasonable to assume that a service in Ripon would carry around 2 trips per vehicle hour. This equates to an annual ridership of 1000 one-way passenger trips. Ridership is also dependent on how expensive the passenger perceives the service as well as how quickly passengers receive a ride. A free service with a large number of vans available for pick-ups will garner significant ridership, along with significant costs. San Joaquin RTD Van Go service charges $4.00 for the general public and $3.00 for discounted passengers. It is recommended that the City of Ripon apply the same fare structure to evening microtransit in Ripon. Accounting for fare revenues, the total annual operating subsidy of this alternative would be $43,900.

CONCLUSIONS
Table 17 presents the relative impact of each of the alternatives compared to the status quo on ridership, vehicle hours, and operating costs. As indicated in the Goals and Performance Measures section, the following performance standards are recommended:
• Passenger-trips per vehicle service hour - 1.5
• Marginal operating cost per trip - $85.42
As shown, three of the above alternatives meet these standards. The following summarizes the findings of Table 17:
• The options that increase fixed route service hours and days have a high marginal operating cost per trip and low productivity (passenger-trips per vehicle hour). • Special Event Shuttle service would provide 30 passenger trips per hour during local events at the nominal cost of $3.78 per passenger trip. This service would also serve to raise awareness of the Blossom Express while also alleviating traffic congestion to and from Mistlin Sports Complex and providing a frequent form of transportation between events and central Ripon. • Microtransit services during weekend evenings (between 5:00 PM and 9:00 PM) would provide

1.7 passenger trips per vehicle hour at between $40.75 and $52.80 per passenger trip. This service would encourage more residents to consider alternative forms of transportation beyond driving a personal vehicle while providing safe, convenient curb-to-curb service for evening recreational activities.

It should also be noted that marketing and creating greater awareness of services will have the largest impact on ridership with the lowest cost. Additional city staff time of roughly 10 hours per month could have a significant impact on ridership. After a good marketing program has been implemented, ridership could potentially return to pre-COVID levels of around 1,000 trips per year.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 58
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 59
Chapter 8

CAPITAL ALTERNATIVES

INTRODUCTION
Capital investments include funding for physical components of the transit system, such as vehicles, facilities, and passenger amenities. Capital investments are necessary to provide safe, dependable, and comfortable services, yet require substantial planning and funding on the part of the transit agency.

While there is always a degree of uncertainty when planning capital improvements, as unanticipated needs arise or prices change, it is still helpful to identify known capital needs to assist with funding. This chapter presents capital projects for the City of Ripon to implement throughout the 10-year planning period to enhance the passenger experience and improve Blossom Express’s cost efficiency.

TRANSIT VEHICLES
Vehicle Replacement Needs
Transit vehicles must be regularly replaced to maintain a safe and reliable fleet. As the vehicle procurement process can take multiple years, transit agencies must identify their vehicle needs well in advance.

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) Innovative Clean Transit (ICT) regulation will begin impacting transit vehicle procurement in 2026, at which point 25 percent of small transit agency fleet bus purchases will be required to be ZEBs. By 2029, this purchasing requirement will increase to 100 percent. By 2040, all vehicles in the fleet will need to be ZEBs. To meet these standards, transit agencies must purchase either battery-electric buses (BEBs) or fuel-cell electric buses (FCEBs).

Currently, Zero Emission Buses (ZEBs) are more expensive than gas or diesel vehicles. As Ripon pursues the transition to ZEBs, it will need to secure additional match funding for capital grants. While ZEBs are currently more expensive, the ZEB market is constantly changing as new models are released and older models are improved, making it hard to predict future pricing. The City is currently replacing its small cutaway vehicle used for Dial-A-Ride with a van. During the on-board survey effort, a large full-size 40+ passenger bus was used to operate Blossom Express.

Considering the low ridership on Blossom Express, it is recommended that Ripon continue to evaluate whether it is more appropriate to replace its larger vehicles with two (2) 15-passenger vehicles with at least one wheelchair position. This size vehicle would also be sufficient for providing special event shuttle service, as discussed in the previous chapter. If a vehicle is replaced in 2026 or later, it will need to be zero-emission. Therefore, the City will also need to install charging infrastructure.

ADMINISTRATIVE AND OPERATIONS FACILITY
The City of Ripon administrative offices and operations facility are located at 259 N. Wilma Avenue in Ripon. There are no major upgrades planned for the facility during the 10-year SRTP planning period.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 60

PASSENGER FACILITIES
Passenger facilities, such as bus stop shelters, benches, and signs, make it easier to find the stop and make the time spent before boarding more comfortable. While Blossom Express is a smaller system, there are a significant number of bus stops. During the passenger surveying efforts, LSC surveyed a total of 23 bus stops in the area to evaluate whether they need improvements.

Bus Stop Improvements
The scale of possible bus stop improvements in the City are limited as the ridership is fairly low.

However, there were three bus stops that did not have any sort of signage: the stops located at Stockton Ave. and Main St., and the Save Mart stop located on Colony Rd. It is recommended that these stops have clear signage installed.

In addition to stops without signage, several other stops were observed to have very faded signage, making it hard for passengers to see which bus serves that particular stop. There was one stop in Ripon at 2nd and 3rd St., which needs to be replaced, with five bus stops in Modesto needing replacement. The following stops in Modesto were faded and need replacement:
• Dale and Veneman
• Vintage Faire Mall
• Applebee's at the Target Shopping Center
• Dale St. / Kaiser Permanente Hospital
• Best Buy at the Target Shopping Center
It is estimated that the cost of installing new signage can vary between $300 and $500 per sign. With this in mind, we anticipate a cost of $1,000 to be spent on local Ripon signage repair, with another $2,500 to be spent replacing faded signage in Modesto.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 61
Chapter 9

INSTITUTIONAL ALTERNATIVES

INTRODUCTION
The City of Ripon currently contracts Blossom Express operations to SJRTD. In recent years, operating costs have risen sharply, prompting an evaluation of Ripon’s transit peers to determine whether to explore alternative contractors or bring operations in-house.

This trend of increasing costs is not unique to Ripon; transit operators nationwide, particularly in California, face similar challenges. Rising wages for drivers and transit staff, driven by higher living costs and industry-wide pay increases, have led to driver shortages and heightened competition within the transportation sector. Additionally, significant increases in insurance premiums—both for transit liability and staff benefits—have further escalated personnel costs. A more detailed table showing current driver wage rates by organization/contractor is included in Appendix A.

Key Findings
• Ripon’s current operations contract with SJRTD includes driver pay rates in line with peer transit agencies.
• SJRTD continues to face driver shortages, which could disrupt Blossom Express operations.

However, this challenge is not unique to SJRTD.
• Private operations contractors typically scale per-hour costs based on contract size. Smaller transit agencies, like Ripon, generally pay higher costs per service hour compared to larger agencies.
• Ripon’s higher cost of living, compared to nearby areas, is reflected in regional home price differences. If Ripon brings operations in-house, the city should anticipate higher driver wages to attract and retain qualified staff.

CONCLUSION
While bringing operations in-house could potentially reduce costs in some ways, it also carries a heightened risk of service interruptions due to driver shortages, especially given the small scale of Ripon’s transit operations.

Implementing a competitive procurement process for operations would help ensure the best value for services. However, providing transit services “in-house” using City of Ripon staff is not recommended, as there would be substantial administrative and other overhead costs. During writing, Ripon negotiated with SJRTD to outline a three-year operating agreement and was able to negotiate the waving of a 20 percent upcharge for drivers in reserve due to the limited span of operations. A review of the proposed agreement appears to be a fair agreement, given the staffing challenges experienced by regional operators and the quality of staff SJRTD has provided to Ripon in the past.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 62
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 63
Chapter 10

MARKETING ALTERNATIVES

INTRODUCTION
Marketing and public outreach are essential components of a small rural public transit system, playing a pivotal role in connecting communities and enhancing accessibility for all. Effective marketing strategies raise awareness about transit options, benefits, and schedules, ensuring that residents are informed and able to utilize these services. Frequent public outreach opportunities foster community engagement and trust, creating a two-way dialogue by which residents' needs and feedback shape transit solutions.

By emphasizing the importance of public transit through targeted marketing and outreach efforts, small rural areas can improve mobility, support local economies, and enhance the overall quality of life for their residents. As many community survey responses requested services to already serviced destinations, it was apparent during this study that the residents of Ripon do not know the current transportation resources available to them. This section discusses potential opportunities to raise public transit awareness within the City.

Developing a Marketing Campaign
The lack of current community knowledge regarding the schedule and destinations of Blossom Express requires a stronger marketing effort city-wide. An effective marketing campaign could be organized internally or outsourced to a marketing agency through an RFP. A successful marketing campaign would focus on target audiences through several strategies as described in additional detail below.

Goals and Objectives
The major goals and objectives that should be accomplished through the marketing campaign should include:

1. Raising Awareness/Education: Creating awareness and improving local knowledge of Blossom Express.

2. Increasing Community Engagement: Having a presence at local events such as the Almond Blossom Festival, Farmers' Markets, Ripon Senior Center events, etc.

Overview of Marketing Strategies
The marketing campaign could feature the following strategies:
• Brand Identity: While Blossom Express currently has its own logo and webpage within the City of Ripon’s website, the city should continue to look for ways to keep the page updated and easy to navigate. The logo should be clearly used on any marketing materials with matching color schemes and updated photography to catch the attention of residents and potential passengers. • Target Audiences: Marketing materials, radio ads, and/or TV commercials should target the audience and general messaging for such marketing materials and commercials. • Community Stakeholders and Events: Building on the list of stakeholders and community members identified during this study, marketing materials should be consistently distributed throughout the year. Several mediums of marketing materials should be developed for this outreach, including:
o Press Releases, Printed Flyers, News Media Print and Web Advertisements, Social Media

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 64
platform posts on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, if applicable. o A few pop-up promotional events could introduce the service to potentially new customers.

As mentioned above, this could include having a booth at the Almond Blossom Festival, Farmers Markets, Ripon Senior Center events, etc.
• Website Updates: The website should be kept up to date and feature the schedule at the very top of the page for quick access.

Branding
One of the most important tools for
marketing a transit system is the agency’s
physical presence in the community.

Branding can include logos, color schemes,
photography, and anything else that
physically represents the transit service.

While there is a logo for the Blossom
Express, it is recommended that it be
featured on the website, on new buses,
and at bus stops
Recommendation
• Bus Stop Signage: As discussed in Chapter 4, some existing bus stop signs have faded and become hard to read. It is recommended that the new bus stop signage with a simple Blossom Express logo would raise community awareness of the current bus service being provided.

Website
The City of Ripon currently hosts a website page for the Blossom Express service; however, this page is very “scroll-heavy” with a lot of information, including the actual schedule, being located at the very bottom of the page with a simple link that is easy to miss. Reorganizing the website to feature the most important information at the top, while also adding a logo and noticeable branding, would help website traffic quickly identify the route and schedule.

Recommendations
• Move the current schedule to the top of the webpage: The City should update the website to include downloadable schedules, route maps, and fare information at the very top of the page.

A downloadable PDF that includes all this information would also be a helpful resource for social service agencies and senior living homes.
• Add Connections to Schedule: Adding a small note next to each stop that connects to another system (for example: Modesto’s S Line at Faire Village Mall) could further assist passengers in planning their trip.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 65
Marketing Materials
Printed rider guides provide directions for riding the bus and act as promotional tools. Passenger guides are
especially valuable for people who do not have a mobile device to access service information while on the go.

Other marketing materials would include flyers, banner
ads on local newspaper websites, printed ads in other
media outlets, and additional bus signage throughout
Ripon.

Special Events, Promotions, and Partnerships
Special events and promotions reward current riders and encourage new residents to try transit.

Common promotional events for transit include free fare days, discounted seasonal passes, and complimentary transit to and from popular local events. These types of promotions require dedicated funding sources, one example being the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds. Another lower-cost option for promoting the transit system is to partner with local organizations with interests relevant to transportation and transit.

The City should consider hosting a few pop-up promotional events to introduce the service to potential new customers. As mentioned above, this could include having a booth at the Almond Blossom Festival, Farmers Markets, Ripon Senior Center events, etc.

Travel Training
Some transit agencies offer a travel training program where new riders who may be intimidated by or unfamiliar with riding the bus can walk through the boarding process with a City staff member or driver.

This kind of program helps to educate and raise the comfort level of passengers, with a particular focus on seniors and persons with disabilities. The City of Ripon does not currently offer a travel training program, and should consider advertising this service on its website and partnering with social service agencies, particularly Bethany Homes.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 66
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 67
Chapter 11

SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN
This Short Range Transit Plan for the City of Ripon Blossom Express and Dial-A-Ride service is the result of public and stakeholder outreach, discussion with the Ripon staff, and analysis of the alternatives evaluated in Chapters 7 and 8.

PLAN ASSUMPTIONS
Forecasts of annual operating and administrative costs were developed as presented in Table 19. “Base case” or “status quo” operating and administrative cost forecasts were based on the City of Ripon FY 2025-26 Transit Budget. An annual inflation escalator of three percent was applied to FY 2025-26 costs to project operating costs for each year of the 10-year planning period (FY 2026-27 through FY 2035-36).

Ridership and corresponding fare revenue for each SRTP element were estimated as presented in Tables 20 and 21. The “base case” ridership represents service levels as of FY 2024-25. Passenger trips have increased by approximately 1 percent annually to account for Ripon’s population growth and increased marketing of the service.

SERVICE PLAN
Operating costs, ridership, and fare revenue estimates for the Blossom Express service plan elements are shown in Tables 19 through 21 and described below. The reader is encouraged to review Chapter 7 (Alternatives Analysis) for more detailed information on how each plan element was developed and analyzed. The following elements are recommended for implementation over the next five years. In 2030, the City Council could consider implementing some of the service expansion alternatives discussed in Chapter 7, if feasible. Each plan element is described below:

Expanded Dial-A-Ride Service
Dial-A-Ride transit services play a major role in ensuring that people who cannot easily use fixed-route transit still have dependable access to essential destinations. Stakeholder and public engagement revealed that many people would like service outside the hours and service area of Blossom Express.

Dial-A-Ride is currently offered 5 days a week to destinations within a 15-mile radius of the City of Ripon to seniors and those with disabilities. However, this service is not actively marketed, as there are only a few volunteers available to drive the van. In light of public and City Council input, the Dial-A-Ride program should be expanded and promoted as follows:
• Offer demand-response service to destinations in Stanislaus County within a 15-mile distance of the City, Monday through Thursday. This service area would include Walmart and Winco in Modesto (requested destinations). The DAR service would not include destinations in San Joaquin County which could be served by the existing VanGo! Service. The hours would be similar to the current Blossom Express schedule (9:30 AM to 2:30 PM), with a 24-hour advance reservation required. The service would be open to the general public and available for any purpose. The fare should be higher than that of Blossom Express to encourage the use of the fixed route when possible. The general public fare should be $15 per one-way trip, while a lower fare of $5 per one-way trip would be available to seniors and the disabled.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 68
• The City of Ripon will need to hire a part-time driver to operate the Dial-A-Ride van to make the program successful. One option would be to share an employee with the Senior Center. This staffer could also assist with marketing and promotion of the service. The City of Ripon will need to ensure that the drivers operating the DAR service participate in ongoing transit driver training and in the City’s drug and alcohol testing program. Although the driver of the smaller van would not be required to obtain or maintain a commercial driver's license, the ongoing training provided to transit drivers helps ensure the driver can demonstrate proficiency in operating the vehicle safely and in assisting passengers.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 69
Table 19: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan Operating Costs Plan Element FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35-36 Base Case Operating Costs(1)
Fixed Route Per Hour and Per Mile $63,550 $65,460 $67,420 $69,440 $71,520 $73,670 $75,880 $78,160 $80,500 $82,920 Dial-A-Ride $6,260 $6,450 $6,640 $6,840 $7,050 $7,260 $7,480 $7,700 $7,930 $8,170 Fixed Costs $76,420 $78,710 $81,070 $83,500 $86,010 $88,590 $91,250 $93,990 $96,810 $99,710 Total $146,230 $150,620 $155,130 $159,780 $164,580 $169,520 $174,610 $179,850 $185,240 $190,800 Plan Element
Expand DAR service to Stanislaus County 4 days a week $71,200 $73,300 $75,500 $77,800 $80,100 $82,500 $85,000 $87,600 $90,200 $92,900 Extend Existing Service Hours Tues. & Thurs.
(8:30 AM - 3:30 PM) $0 $31,610 $32,560 $33,540 $34,550 $35,580 $36,650 $37,750 $38,880 $40,050 Friday and Saturday Microtransit
(5:00 PM - 9:00 PM) $44,600 $45,940 $47,320 $48,730 $50,200 $51,700 $53,250 $54,850 $56,500 $58,190 Thursday Microtransit to Farmers Market
(5:00 PM - 8:00 PM) $5,040 $5,190 $5,340 $5,500 $5,670 $5,840 $6,010 $6,190 $6,380 $6,570 Special Event Shuttle Services (2x per year) $0 $0 $1,860 $1,910 $1,970 $2,030 $2,090 $2,150 $2,220 $2,280 Expand Deviation Area to All of City of Ripon $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $60 $60 $60 $60 Additional Transit Planning and Marketing Support $20,600 $21,900 $23,900 $26,900 $31,200 $37,300 $45,900 $58,100 $75,800 $101,900 Total Recommended Plan Elements $141,490 $177,990 $186,530 $194,430 $203,740 $215,000 $228,960 $246,700 $270,040 $301,950 Total Operating Costs $287,720 $328,610 $341,660 $354,210 $368,320 $384,520 $403,570 $426,550 $455,280 $492,750 Note 1: Base case operating costs based on City of Ripon FY 2024-25 budget and increased for inflation by 3% annually.

SRTP Recommendations

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 70
Although it is likely that DAR trips would only be requested once or twice a week, the Financial Plan conservatively assumes the maximum possible cost for the expanded DAR service. After one year, the City should review ridership and costs associated with the Dial-A-Ride service to assess the financial feasibility of the program. If annual ridership does not exceed at least the 30-trips per year currently carried, the program should be reevaluated. After one year, the driver should conduct surveys of Dial-ARide passengers to determine if the service area and hours meet the needs of passengers.

Evening Weekend and Farmers Market Microtransit Service On‑demand microtransit provides a flexible way to travel in smaller suburban communities. Rather than following fixed routes and set bus stops or schedules, vehicles operate within a defined service area and respond to real‑time trip requests, thereby connecting passengers to key destinations such as shopping, dining, and community events. Bethany Homes noted that later‑evening service would be a valuable addition for Ripon, especially for their clients hoping to go out for evening social events.

This service may also appeal to general public residents going out to dinner in the evening or attending the Farmers Market that’s open between May and September. This plan recommends that these microtransit services be provided through an extension of SJRTD’s Van Go! service on Friday and Saturday evenings between 5:00 PM and 9:00 PM and on Thursdays between 5:00 PM and 8:00 PM, when the Farmer’s Market operates. The Study Team reviewed various options for providing the service (internally and contracting with different entities). Extending the existing contract with RTD was the most cost-effective option and could be implemented relatively quickly.

The microtransit plan elements will add roughly $51,130 in annual operating costs beginning in FY 2027-

28. Friday and Saturday evening microtransit is projected to carry an additional 820 passenger trips per year over the status quo ridership, with Farmers Market microtransit adding 120 passenger trips per year over status quo. The Ripon Chamber of Commerce will assist the City with the marketing efforts necessary to launch the new microtransit services.

Expanded Blossom Express Service on Tuesday and Thursday (8:30 AM – 3:30 PM) Community surveys and stakeholder interviews highlighted the need for a longer Blossom Express service span to allow more time in Modesto to conduct errands, as well as have more travel time options. Many riders noted that the current schedule doesn’t allow for earlier morning appointments or later afternoon social engagements or personal errands. Additionally, during our stakeholder outreach, Bethany Homes expressed that their clients would appreciate a longer span of service.

After the expanded DAR option has been implemented and evaluated, the City could consider expanding the service span of Blossom Express by two additional service hours each service day (Tuesday and Thursday) with a schedule of 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM. This adjustment would provide riders with greater flexibility, reduce scheduling barriers, and improve overall access to key regional destinations. The surveys conducted at the end of the first year of Expanded DAR service should ask passengers if the 9:30 AM to 2:30 PM service span still meets their needs. If there is still a desire for a longer service day to the Vintage Faire Mall, this plan element should be implemented.

The Financial Plan (Table 22) assumes that expanded Blossom Express Service would be implemented in FY 2027-28. Extending service on Tuesdays and Thursdays would increase existing marginal costs by $31,610 in FY 2027-28, increasing by 3 percent each year after. The extended hours would result in an additional estimated 184 passenger trips per year.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 71
Special Event Shuttle Services
Providing shuttles for large-scale events such as the Almond Blossom Festival and the Fourth of July Fireworks at Mistlin Sports Complex would help mitigate congestion and raise public awareness of transportation options within a community. It is recommended that this service be implemented as needed beginning in FY 2028-29 and could result in an increase of roughly 460 passenger trips per year, depending on the events service. The additional annual operating cost is estimated to be $2,730 annually.

Expand Deviation Area to Serve City of Ripon
A small portion of the City is not included in the ¾ mile deviation area offered by Blossom Express.

Allowing the residents of the entire city to request a ¾ mile deviation would have limited financial impacts ($50 annually) and simplify transit service. This change will generate only a few additional passenger trips (approximately 10 per year). It should be noted that there may be sections of the city which are not easily accessible using the Blossom Express bus. Therefore, deviation requests must be considered on a case-by-case basis.

ADMINISTRATIVE AND MARKETING PLAN
Many local jurisdictions that operate public transit dedicate a significant portion or a full staff member to overseeing the transit system. Currently, an on-call transit consultant is used to fill this need, along with oversight from the City Administrator/City Engineer. One of the significant findings from the existing conditions review and surveys was that Blossom Express is not well known in the community.

Transit-specific marketing could increase ridership on Blossom Express and will also be a key component of the rollout of evening microtransit services.

Therefore, as part of this SRTP, roughly $20,000 is allocated to Additional Transit Planning and Marketing Support each year. This money can be used to fund part-time staff to implement plan changes, monitor the Van Go! contract with SJRTD, and execute marketing recommendations. This could be accomplished through increasing the contract with the current on-call transit planning consultant or hiring a part-time staff person.

Marketing Recommendations
Online Community Survey responses indicate that few residents are familiar with the existing Blossom Express or Dial‑A‑Ride services. To reinforce the recommended service changes, expanded marketing and outreach efforts are needed to strengthen public understanding and improve the community’s awareness and perception of Blossom Express. Chapter 10 outlines several strategies to enhance public awareness of the service, including updating the agency website, replacing outdated bus stop signage, and distributing information through press releases, printed materials, and email communications using the stakeholder database developed as part of this planning process.

In addition to increasing marketing efforts, it would be beneficial for current passengers to have better access to trip planning services. This plan recommends that Blossom Express organize its stop and schedule information into General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) format so that riders can use transit apps, such as Google Maps and Transit, to find current bus stops and schedules. Maintaining information in GTFS will make Blossom Express more visible to visitors and residents, support trip planning, and help connections to other regional transportation providers such as SJRTD and StanRTA.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 72
To implement this recommendation, either a transit consultant or city staff member could compile Blossom Express’s stop locations, schedules, and route information into the standard GTFS format— either by using free tools like GTFS editors, working with a vendor, or partnering with the regional planning agency for technical support. Once the feed is created, it can be published online and kept up to date as service changes.

CAPITAL PLAN
Transit services require ongoing capital investment in facilities and vehicles. Capital investments in both vehicles and passenger facilities can attract additional riders while improving the quality of service and safety of existing riders.

Fleet Replacement
Although Blossom Express vehicles will reach the end of their useful life in terms of years during this planning period, they will not in terms of miles. Given the low ridership on the service, when vehicles are replaced, they could be replaced with a smaller-capacity bus. Another factor to consider is that, per CARB regulations, all new vehicle purchases made in FY 2029-30 and beyond will need to be zeroemission. Therefore, it is recommended that the City replace one of the Blossom Express Gilligs with a smaller 29-foot low-floor CNG bus in FY 2028-29. This size vehicle would also be sufficient for providing special event shuttle service. This vehicle will need to be purchased prior to the end of FY 2028-29 and is expected to cost approximately $780,000 to be funded with SB 125 funds.

The next vehicle purchase is slated for FY 2034-35, when the DAR vehicle will be eligible. This vehicle will need to be EV. A placeholder for vehicle cost and associated charging infrastructure is shown in the financial plan.

The next replacement date for the Gilligs used for Blossom Express is outside of the 10-year window; however, it is recommended that the City of Ripon review upcoming vehicle replacement needs in FY 2034-35, particularly as new ZEVs are quite expensive.

Passenger Facilities
Passenger facilities represent bus stop shelters, benches, and signs, information kiosks, etc. The quality of passenger amenities is an important factor in a passenger’s overall perception of a transit service. It is recommended that existing Ripon bus stops be maintained and replaced as needed over the duration of the planning period. A small amount of money ($1,000) is set aside in the financial plan every other year for this purpose.

CNG Fueling Station Improvement Project
The City of Ripon is planning a major upgrade to its CNG Fueling Station over the next several years.

PG&E will install a new distribution-level gas line to replace the existing transmission-level service currently supplying the station. The city will also replace the two existing CNG compressors with new units designed for distribution-pressure operation. The total project cost is estimated at approximately $1.9 million and will be funded with SB 125 funds. This is reflected in the financial plan below.

Zero-Emission Vehicle Charging Infrastructure
Per CARB requirements and state goals, public transit fleets should be 100 percent zero-emission by 2040. In preparation for a transition to battery electric technology, the financial plan shows a placeholder of $15,000 for charging infrastructure in the later years of the plan.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 73

FINANCIAL PLAN
Table 22 presents the 10-Year Operating and Capital Financial Plan for the City of Ripon’s transit services. As shown, sufficient revenue is available for SRTP elements and planned capital projects, including future vehicle replacement and other capital costs. The financial plan is based on the City of Ripon FY 2025-26 budget and assumes the following:
• Passenger fares are based on anticipated passenger trips and population growth. • The SJCOG requirement that 25 percent of LTF revenue be spent on transit remains throughout the planning period. LTF revenue was based on the City of Ripon's budgeted projections. • Revenue received through Measure K will remain flat over the planning period. • Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5311 operating revenue is assumed and escalated at the rate of 2 percent annually, in an amount up to half of the total operating costs, as allowed per the FTA. FTA funds are a transit-specific funding source. As the City of Ripon is not taking advantage of funding through the FTA, this money is currently being allocated to other jurisdictions in San Joaquin County.
• SB 125 revenue is assumed for FY 2026-27 and will fund the CNG bus purchase and CNG compressor project.

As shown, the recommended existing service enhancements, microtransit service, transit-specific staff time, capital improvements, and marketing strategies are funded over the next 10 years without funds being diverted from the City General Fund or other purposes.

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The following section outlines an implementation plan for the City of Ripon transit services over the next 10 years.

FY 2026-27
• Implement Farmers Market and Friday and/ Saturday evening Van Go! microtransit services. o Amend contract with RTD for expanded Van Go! service
o Market the new service through the Chamber of Commerce • Promote and implement an expanded Dial-A-Ride Service. o Hire part-time Dial-A-Ride/Senior Center driver
o Advertise Dial-A-Ride program through the Senior Center, Bethany Homes, and other City media outlets
o Monitor ridership and costs every six months
• After a year, it is recommended that a survey of Dial-A-Ride and Van Go! passengers be conducted to understand if these new services meet the needs of the community. Depending on service productivity, survey results, and budget, the City could then consider expanding the hours of Blossom Express in FY 2027-28 (noted below). More specifically, the following would trigger the consideration of expanding Blossom Express hours:
o Low ridership on the DAR service (below ridership estimates in Table 20) o Passenger comments regarding the need for a longer service day o Higher than estimated costs of expanded DAR due to a high level of dead-heading to pick up/drop off passengers

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 74
FY 2027-28
• Extend Blossom Express hours on Tuesdays and Thursdays as a pilot service for one year. • Replace one of the Gilligs with a CNG bus. Evaluate the continued need for a large bus.

FY 2028-29
• Provide Special Event Shuttle twice a year for major City events. • Market Special Event Shuttle services through the Chamber of Commerce and Event Staff. • Re-evaluate the microtransit (Van Go!) pilot program. If microtransit does not carry 2.0 passenger-trips per hour on average, consider elimination of the program. • Re-evaluate Blossom Express service hours expansion. Conducted boarding and alighting counts for two weeks.

FY 2029-30 through FY 2035-36
• Evaluate all services annually to ensure that they are within budget and meeting the needs of the community.
• Add Wednesday Service on Blossom Express - If Blossom Express ridership remains at or above 700 trips per year and is warranted through survey input. • Replace the DAR vehicle with an electric small bus.
• Plan for the replacement of one of the Blossom Express vehicles with a Zero-emission vehicle.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 75
Table 20: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan - Ridership Plan Element FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35-36 Base Case Ridership
Fixed Route 720 720 730 740 750 750 760 770 780 780
Dial-A-Ride 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Total 750 750 760 770 780 780 790 800 810 810
Plan Element
Expand DAR service to Stanislaus County 4
days a week 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Extend Existing Service Hours Tues. & Thurs.
(8:30 AM - 3:30 PM) 0 184 185 187 189 191 193 195 197 199 Friday and Saturday Microtransit
(5:00 PM - 9:00 PM) 828 840 840 850 860 870 880 890 900 910 Thursday Microtransit to Farmers Market
(5:00 PM - 8:00 PM) 121 122 124 125 126 127 129 130 131 133 Special Event Shuttle Services (2x per year) 0 0 460 470 470 480 480 490 490 500 Expand Deviation Area to All of City of Ripon 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Subtotal Plan Elements 1,049 1,247 1,711 1,735 1,749 1,774 1,788 1,812 1,826 1,851 Total Plan Ridership 1,799 1,997 2,471 2,505 2,529 2,554 2,578 2,612 2,636 2,661 SRTP Recommendations

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 76
Table 21: City of Ripon Short Range Transit Plan - Fare Revenue Plan Element FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35-36 Base Case Fare Revenue
Fixed Route $930 $940 $950 $960 $970 $980 $990 $1,000 $1,010 $1,020 Dial-A-Ride $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $930 $940 $950 $960 $970 $980 $990 $1,000 $1,010 $1,020 Plan Element
Expand DAR service to Stanislaus County 4
days a week $1,000 $1,010 $1,020 $1,030 $1,041 $1,051 $1,062 $1,072 $1,083 $1,094 Extend Existing Service Hours Tues. & Thurs.
(8:30 AM - 3:30 PM) $0 $204 $206 $208 $210 $212 $214 $217 $219 $221 Friday and Saturday Microtransit
(5:00 PM - 9:00 PM) $3,310 $3,350 $3,380 $3,410 $3,450 $3,480 $3,520 $3,550 $3,590 $3,620 Thursday Microtransit to Farmers Market
(5:00 PM - 8:00 PM) $480 $490 $490 $500 $500 $510 $510 $520 $520 $530 Special Event Shuttle Services (2x per year) $0 $0 $610 $610 $620 $630 $630 $640 $650 $650 Expand Deviation Area to All of City of Ripon $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Plan Elements $4,790 $5,050 $5,710 $5,760 $5,820 $5,880 $5,940 $6,000 $6,060 $6,110 Total Plan Fare Revenue $5,720 $5,990 $6,660 $6,720 $6,790 $6,860 $6,930 $7,000 $7,070 $7,130 SRTP Recommendations

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 77
Table 22: City of Ripon Transit Financial Plan
FY26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 FY 34-35 FY 35-36 Operating Revenues
Passenger Fares $1,010 $1,020 $1,030 $1,040 $1,050 $1,060 $1,070 $1,080 $1,090 $1,100 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5311 $108,260 $109,405 $128,810 $134,255 $139,455 $145,380 $149,329 $152,316 $155,362 $158,469 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Local
Transportation Fund (LTF) $274,600 $277,300 $280,100 $282,900 $285,700 $288,600 $291,500 $294,400 $297,300 $300,300 Bethany Home Vehicle Rental for DAR $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Measure K $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 $58,583 Interest $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 Carryover balance $1,233,108 $1,402,561 $1,571,749 $1,455,312 $1,601,500 $1,742,068 $1,878,291 $2,004,093 $2,102,662 $2,098,127 Total Operating Revenue $1,684,561 $1,857,869 $2,049,272 $1,941,090 $2,095,288 $2,244,691 $2,387,773 $2,519,472 $2,623,997 $2,625,579 Base Case Operating $146,230 $150,620 $155,130 $159,780 $164,580 $169,520 $174,610 $179,850 $185,240 $190,800 SRTP Recommendations $141,490 $141,490 $177,990 $186,530 $194,430 $203,740 $215,000 $228,960 $246,700 $270,040 Total Operating Costs $287,720 $287,720 $328,610 $341,660 $354,210 $368,320 $384,520 $403,570 $426,550 $455,280 SRTP Fare Revenue $5,720 $5,990 $6,660 $6,720 $6,790 $6,860 $6,930 $7,000 $7,070 $7,130 Balance $1,402,561 $1,571,749 $1,722,812 $1,601,500 $1,743,068 $1,878,291 $2,005,093 $2,117,662 $2,199,127 $2,171,869 Operating Revenue Needed for Capital Projects $0 $0 -$267,500 $0 -$1,000 $0 -$1,000 -$15,000 -$101,000 $0 Net Operating Fund Balance $1,402,561 $1,571,749 $1,455,312 $1,601,500 $1,742,068 $1,878,291 $2,004,093 $2,102,662 $2,098,127 $2,171,869 Capital Revenues
FTA 5339 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SGR $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
SB 125 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Capital Revenue $2,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Expenditures
Vehicle Replacement $0 $0 $780,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 Bus stop improvements $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 ZEB Charging Infrastructure $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 CNG Upgrade $1,885,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Capital Costs $1,886,500 $0 $781,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $15,000 $101,000 $0 Balance $513,500 $513,500 -$267,500 $0 -$1,000 $0 -$1,000 -$15,000 -$101,000 $0 Operating Revenue Needed for Capital Projects $0 $0 $267,500 $0 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $15,000 $101,000 $0 Net Capital Fund Balance $513,500 $513,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Source: City of Ripon FY 2025-26 budget

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Short Range Transit Plan LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page 86
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-1
Appendix A

DEMOGRAPHIC MAPS

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-2
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-3

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-4

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-5

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-6

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix A LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page A-7

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix B LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page B1
Appendix B

BLOSSOM EXPRESS ON-BOARD PASSENGER SURVEY RESULTS

INTRODUCTION
The City of Ripon retained LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. to prepare the 2024 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). As a part of this effort, LSC conducted onboard passenger surveys on-board Blossom Express on November 12th and 14th 2024. Trained survey staff were on-board the bus to distribute and collect surveys, as well as to assist passengers with taking the survey. The on-board survey timeframe covered the full range of operating hours on Tuesday and Thursday, which represents a complete week of Blossom Express service.

The survey instrument consisted of a one-page questionnaire printed on card stock; the questions were presented in English on one side and Spanish on the reverse side. The survey included 12 multiplechoice and short-answer questions, as well as a write-in comment section. This appendix explores the survey results. In all, 4 survey responses were received, 3 in English and 1 in Spanish. Over the survey period, 7 one-way trips were made by a total of 4 passengers, all of which participated in the survey.

RESULTS
Age of Riders
• All survey participants came from different age groups, the only groups that were not represented were youth under the age of 18, and young adults between the ages of 25 and 34.

This indicates that Blossom Express is utilized by a diverse group of community members, not exclusively seniors.

Trip Patterns
• All 4 of the responses were collected between 9:30 AM and 10:15 AM during the first Blossom Express Trip of the Day.
• Three out of the four participants boarded the route in Ripon, and one in Modesto. o One passenger boarded at Bethany Home for a shopping trip to Save Mart, they returned to Bethany Home via a route deviation on the second AM Blossom Express Trip.
o One passenger boarded at Bethany Home for a Medical Trip to Kaiser Permanente in Modesto, this passenger did not make a return trip via Blossom Express o One passenger boarded at the W Colony and Goodwin stop near Save Mart and got off at Dale and Veneman to connect to Stan RTA to get to school, they made a return trip from Vintage Faire Mall to the Ripon Senior Center stop on the first afternoon Blossom Express trip.
o One passenger boarded at the Vintage Faire Mall and got off at the Ripon Library to visit the Eye Doctor, Bank, and Post Office in Ripon. They made a return trip to Modesto from the Ripon Post Office on the first afternoon Blossom Express Trip.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix B LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page B2
These trip patterns indicate that most participants utilize Blossom Express to make short trips for a specific task and that the service is more widely used by residents of Ripon than those who reside in Modesto.

Means of Travel to Bus Stop
• Two of the participants walked to reach their stop at Bethany Home, and W Colony and Goodwin.
• One lived at Bethany Home
• One took the Stan RTA Dial-A-Ride (DAR) from their home to connect with Blossom Express.

These responses indicate that Blossom Express stop locations within Ripon are well located to provide convenient access for residents.

Alternative Means of Transportation to Blossom Express
• Three out of the four participants did not have access to a vehicle that they could have used to make their trip.
• If Blossom Express was unavailable:
o Two participants would not make their trip.
o One would take a Taxi, Uber, or Lyft.
o One would drive their personal vehicle.
• Three out of four participants reported that they ride Blossom Express at least once a week, and the remaining participant reported that they ride 1 to 4 days a month. • Only one participant reported that they utilize other Regional Transit services, that person reported that they utilize the StanRTA ADA Paratransit DAR service. o One participant provided a write-in comment that other regional transit services “don’t exist”.

These responses indicate that many Blossom Express passengers are regular riders, and without the service, they would lack a cost-effective means of transportation to complete their trips.

Blossom Express Information Access
• None of the participants reported that they utilize the Blossom Express webpage or social media to access Blossom Express route or schedule information. o Two participants reported that they asked the driver for information. o One participant reported that they asked Bethany Home staff for help. o One participant reported that they called the Blossom Express hotline.

These responses potentially indicate that Blossom Express riders are not adept at using information technology to access Blossom Express information, or that the current webpage is not user-friendly. The website currently does not display a route map, and the scheduling timetable is difficult to locate on the webpage. The current webpage also advertises that electronic bus passes can be purchased via the Vamos Mobility app, when attempting to do so in the app the message is provided that Blossom Express “Service is not bookable in the application”, additionally reviews from the app as recent as 10/24/2024

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix B LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page B3
report that the app has serious technical issues and frequently does not allow users to utilize passes that they have purchased in the app.

The City-provided Blossom Express hotline on the other hand provides friendly, responsive, and knowledgeable service to users seeking information during their business hours which are 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM, Monday through Thursday.

Passenger Opinions of Blossom Express Services
Three of the 4 participants responded to a question that asked participants to rate aspects of Blossom Express’s services on a one (poor) to five (excellent) scale. • The categories of service frequency, value for fare, safety on both bus and at stops, driver courtesy, bus cleanliness, customer service, bus stop location, and overall satisfaction with the service were rated five out of 5 across all participants. • One participant rated the categories of reliability/on-time performance, and ease of understanding service offerings as four out of five, while other participants rated these categories as five out of five.
• Another participant rated the categories of bus stop features, and regional connectivity with other transit services as poor, while other participants rated these categories as 5 out of 5.

This participant voiced specific requests for improvement which included providing a stop shelter at the Post Office stop, and that the timing of connections with San Joaquin RTD, and Stan RTD routes are not optimized.

These responses indicate that overall riders are very happy with the service, especially the level of customer service provided by drivers. Solutions that would improve passenger opinions of the service reassessing the timing of routes to increase on-time performance and regional connectivity, as well as bus stop improvements like replacing faded signs, as well as providing shelters, route maps, and schedules at primary stops.

Open Ended Response
None of the participants provided any write-in comments or suggestions in the open-ended response section of the survey. However, one participant voiced to the surveyor several comments and suggestions.
• Blossom Express is the only area public transit offering that allows users to reach destinations across the San Joaquin / Stanislaus County line, which was described as “the bane of existence for public transit users”.
• “Blossom Express should increase marketing and provide an in-person focus group, there are lots of older folks who would really benefit from the service but don’t know about it. If you want to reach the community members of Ripon focus on reaching out to religious organizations, eldercare providers, and the agricultural community.”

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix C LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page C-1
Appendix C

REGIONAL DRIVER PAY RATES

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix C LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page C-2
This page intentionally left blank.

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan) 2026 Ripon Short Range Transit Plan – Appendix C LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

City of Ripon Page C-3
Table C-1: Peer Driver Pay Rates
Organization Contractor Starting Top Average Benefits
SJRTD Proposed Ripon Agreement $27.39
Retirement, Comprehensive Health,
PTO and Paid Holidays
SJRTD In-House $19.74 $25.82 $22.78
Paid CDL Traning, Retirement,
Comprehensive Health, PTO and
Paid Holidays
Ripon USD In-House $20.15 $30.48 $25.32 --(1)
Lodi Transdev $21.30 -- --
Merced Transdev $21.22 $28.11 $24.67
StanRTA Transdev $21.86 -- --
Manteca MTM $22.00 $26.00 $24.00
Affordable Medical, Dental, and
Vision Insurance, Paid training, and
Overtime opportunities.

Tracy MTM $23.00 -- -- 401(k)
Peer Average $21.32 $27.60 $24.19
Note 1: Ripon USD part-time employees are potentially elgible for Calpers dependent on hours worked per fiscal year.

Comprehensive health insurance, life
insurance, tuition reimbursement,
maternity / paternity leave, and 401K.

Commercial Driver’s License
(CDL) Training
Source: Transportation Operator and Contractor Job Ads
Advertized Job Ad January 2025
Driver Pay Rate

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 2026 Ripon SRTP Final Plan - with appendices (5007 : Short Range Transit Plan)

Ripon City CouncilApril 14, 2026

Ripon City Council
April 14, 2026