Cities Index.
Agenda, closed session, second session

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority / Public Financing Authority
February 27, 2024

Document
Agenda, closed session, second session
Meeting
February 27, 2024
Body
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority / Public Financing Authority
Pages
7
Original file
31.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.riverbank.org. That file is the official record.

Any documents that are not privileged or part of a Closed Session provided to a majority of the City Council/LRA Board after distribution of the agenda packet, regarding any item on this agenda, will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office 6707 Third St., Suite A, Riverbank. Page 1 of 4
AGEND
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2024 – 6:00 P.M.
(THE AGENDA PACKET IS ONLINE AT HTTP://WWW.RIVERBANK.ORG/AGENDACENTER) MEETING LOCATION:

RIVERBANK COMMUNITY CENTER
3600 SANTA FE STREET

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. FLAG SALUTE

3. INVOCATION

4. ROLL CALL

5. AGENDA CHANGES

6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Any Council/Authority Member or Staff who has a direct Conflict of Interest on any scheduled agenda item to be considered is to declare their conflict at this time.

7. PRESENTATIONS (Informational only)- No items Scheduled

8. PUBLIC COMMENTS (No action can be taken)
At this time, members of the public may comment on any item not appearing on the agenda, and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council/LRA Board. Individual comments will be limited to a maximum of 3 minutes (or as stated by the presiding Officer) and time cannot be yielded to another person. Under State Law, matters presented during the public comment period cannot be discussed or acted upon.

Zoom Comments WILL NOT be available.

Public Comments for this meeting can only be made via
prior written submittal or In-Person.

Refer to the last page of the agenda for procedures.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are to be acted upon by a single action of the City Council/LRA Board unless requested by an individual Council/Authority Member or member of the public for special consideration. Otherwise, the recommendation of staff will be accepted and acted upon by motion of the City Council/LRA Board.

Item 9.1 Waive Readings. All Readings of ordinances and resolutions, except by title, are waived.

CITY OF RIVERBANK
Regular City Council and
Local Redevelopment Authority
Board Meetings
Community Center
3600 Santa Fe Street
Riverbank, CA 95367

CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
Mayor/Chair
Richard D. O’Brien
Council/Authority Members
District 1 - Luis Uribe
District 2 - Rachel Hernandez
Vice Mayor, District 3 - Leanne Jones Cruz
District 4 - Darlene Barber-Martinez
City Council and LRA Board Meetings Agenda February 27, 2024 Next City Council Resolution: 2024-006 Next Ordinance: 2024-003 Next Local Redevelopment Authority Board Resolution 2024-001 Any documents that are not privileged or part of a Closed Session provided to a majority of the City Council/LRA Board after distribution of the agenda packet, regarding any item on this agenda, will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office 6707 Third St., Suite A, Riverbank. Page 2 of 4
Item 9.2 Acceptance of the Pavement Restoration 2023 Project and Authorization to File a Notice of Completion
Item 9.3 Acceptance of the Topeka Street Improvement Project and Authorization to File a Notice of Completion
Item 9.4 Public Works Construction Standards: Resolution to Replace in its Entirety CITY OF RIVERBANK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS – Design Standards and Standard Plans for Section 5 - Water
Item 9.5 Resolution Authorizing the Allocation of $44,100 from the General Fund Reserves for Translation Services Related to the River Walk Draft Environmental Impact Report

10. PUBLIC HEARING
The Public Notice for Item 10.1 was published on 2/07/2024 in the Riverbank News.

Item 10.1 Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Amendments- It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Amendments.

11. NEW BUSINESS
The Public Notice for Item 11.1 was published on 2/07/2024 in the Riverbank News.

Item 11.1 A Resolution of Concurrence and Support for the Approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Action Plan (AAP)- It is recommended that the City Council open the Community Meeting, accept Public Comment, and consider adopting a Resolution of Concurrence and support for the approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Action Plan (AAP).

Item 11.2 Presentation- River Walk Specific Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)- The environmental consultant will be presenting 1) the proposed River Walk Specific Plan, and 2) the Draft EIR to the City Council and members of the public. This agenda item is not a public hearing no formal action is required.

Item 11.3 Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Finalize a Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease Agreement for the Lease of 6436 Oakdale Road for the Future Site of Riverbank City Hall- It is recommended that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and finalize a Standard Industrial/Commercial SingleTenant Lease Agreement for 6436 Oakdale Road.

City Council and LRA Board Meetings Agenda February 27, 2024 Next City Council Resolution: 2024-006 Next Ordinance: 2024-003 Next Local Redevelopment Authority Board Resolution 2024-001 Any documents that are not privileged or part of a Closed Session provided to a majority of the City Council/LRA Board after distribution of the agenda packet, regarding any item on this agenda, will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office 6707 Third St., Suite A, Riverbank. Page 3 of 4

12. COMMENTS/REPORTS
A brief report on notable attendance of a meeting or conference or other notable topics of City business shall be made.

The Brown Act does not allow for discussion or action of items by the City Council/LRA Board during this time.

Item 12.1 Staff
Item 12.2 Council/Authority Member
Item 12.3 Mayor/Chair

13. CLOSED SESSION-No Items Scheduled.

The public will have a limit of 3 minutes to comment on Closed Session item(s) as set forth on the agenda prior to the City Council/LRA Board recessing to Closed Session

14. ADJOURNMENT
The Next Regular City Council Meeting will be on:

Tuesday, March 12th, 2024
Regular Meeting Location: Council Chambers, 6707 Third Street, Suite B

ADA COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, the City will make every effort to make reasonable modifications or accommodations from individuals with disabilities. Contact the Administration Dept. at (209) 863-7122 or the City Clerk at [email protected] at least (48) hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements for accessibility.

NOTICE REGARDING NON-ENGLISH SPEAKERS
Pursuant to California Constitution Article III, Section IV, establishing English as the official language for the State of California, and in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedures Section 185, which requires proceedings before any State Court to be in English, notice is hereby given that all proceedings before the City of Riverbank City Council/LRA Board shall be in English and anyone wishing to address the Council is required to have a translator present who will take an oath to make an accurate translation from any language not English into the English language.

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted at the meeting location, on the North City Hall public exterior bulletin board, South City Hall public exterior Bulletin, Riverbank Community Center exterior bulletin, and the City’s website 72 hours prior to the meeting in accordance to the California Ralph M. Brown Act.

Posted this 23rd Day of February, 2024
/s/Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk

Page 4 of 4 ends

PUBLIC “LIVE” VIEWING
• Government Channels: Charter– 2 and AT&T U-VERSE – 99 • YouTube Live – City of Riverbank
• Via ZOOM Platform (See instructions below)

SUBMITTING PUBLIC COMMENTS FOR THE RECORD

Written comments must be received before 4:00 p.m. on the date of the meeting in order for them to be distributed to the Council prior to consideration of the matter. Written comments will not be read aloud at the meeting, but will be reported as received for the record. If you do not receive an acknowledgement of receipt within an hour of submission or by 5:00 pm, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (209) 863-7198 or the Administration Dept. at (209) 863-7122.

ACCEPTABLE METHODS OF SUBMITTING COMMENTS BEFORE THE 4:00 PM DEADLINE ● Via Mail Service: Mail comments to City of Riverbank, Attn. City Clerk, 6707 Third Street, Suite A, Riverbank, CA 95367. (Call 209-863-7198 / 209-863-7122 to ensure they were received.)
● Via Email: Mail to [email protected] (Note: This technology is not a guaranteed method.)
• Indicate Agenda Item # in the subject line. (Call 209-863-7198 /209-863-7122 to ensure receipt)
● Oral Comments In-Person: The Mayor will ask the public if anyone wishes to comment, at that time you may approach the podium.

JOIN THE MEETING VIA ZOOM PLATFORM
Join by this link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88456937875 Join by accessing website: https://zoom.us/join , enter Webinar ID: 884 5693 7875 Join by telephone:1 669 444 9171 OR 1 669 900 9128, plus Webinar ID: 884 5693 7875 Learn about using ZOOM - Visit https://zoom.us/j/94943925973?status=success for a free account or to download the app.

TELECONFERENCE/VIRUAL PLATFORM PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

COMMENT PROCEDURES FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD IN

CONFORMANCE WITH THE BROWN ACT

Page 1 of 1 ends

Item 9.1 – CC/LRA 2/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.1
SECTION 9: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Waiver of Readings
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk/LRA Secretary

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council / LRA Board approve the waiver of readings of any proposed ordinances and resolutions for consideration, except by title.

SUMMARY
In lieu of reading the entire text of a proposed ordinance or resolution that is introduced for consideration for adoption and approval, by majority vote, the City Council/LRA Board may waive the reading of the text and introduce the ordinance or resolution by title only for the record.

The full text of the proposed ordinances and resolutions, and any related documents that are part of the agenda packet, are available for review by the public on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall (North) upon distribution to a majority of the City Council/LRA Board; typically 72 hours prior to the scheduled date and time of the meeting.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to this item.

ATTACHMENTS
There are no attachments to this report.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Item 9.2 – CC/LRA 02/27/24

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.2
SECTION 9: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Acceptance of the Pavement Restoration 2023 Project and Authorization to File a Notice of Completion
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Kathleen Cleek, Development Services Administration Manager Laura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the completion of the Pavement Restoration 2023 Project and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion.

SUMMARY:

Pavement Coatings Co. completed the construction of the Pavement Restoration 2023 Project. William Kull, City Engineer and City staff have completed a final inspection and determined that construction has been completed per the plans and specifications.

The contract was awarded on June 13, 2023 to Pavement Coatings Co. in the amount of $691,651.80. Three contract change orders were issued for this project in the amount of $80,448.72. The total cost of construction is $772,100.52. The high cost of the change orders is because it was determined during construction that it was best to reconfigure the striping along Roselle Ave with the addition of Bike Lane Striping.

It is recommended that the Council accept the Pavement Restoration 2023 Project as complete and authorize the Senior Project Coordinator to record the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding has been programmed for this project with Measure L Funds, the total cost of construction is $772,100.52.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Item 9.2 – CC/LRA 02/27/24
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Notice of Completion

2. Photos

3. Site Map

CITY OF RIVERBANK
ATTN: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES6707 THIRD STREETRIVERBANK, CA 95367 City of Riverbank
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
X
N/A
N/A

CITY OF RIVERBANK
Exempt from Recording Fees (Per Government Code Section 27388.1) February 27, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Riverbank Stanislaus California
Stanislaus California
Riverbank
City of RiverbankLaura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator Pavement Coatings Co.

Pavement Restoration 2023 Project
various street in Riverbank, CA 95367
27th February 2024
City of RiverbankLaura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator 27th February 2024
for the installation of a Type II Micro-Surfacing, striping removal, installation of new striping, traffic control, street sweeping and all other work included on the plans.

Pavement Restoration 2023 Project
Photos
ATTACHMENT 2
O.I.D
M. I. D. LATERAL #6 100' R/W
O.I.D
M.I.D. MAIN CANAL 150'R/W
SHT-3
SHT-4
SHT-7
SHT-6
SHT-2
SHT-5
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 2000'
1 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
COVER SHEET - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 CITY OF RIVERBANK

PAVEMENT RESTORATION
PROJECT 2023
12/31/24 - MICRO-SURFACING
ATTACHMENT 3
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
2 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
3 STREET INDEX - 2023

PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
4 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING
O.I.D
M.I.D. MAIN CANAL 150'R/W
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
5 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING

CARDOZO
SCHOOL

CASTLEBERG PARK

CALIFORNIA
AVENUE
SCHOOL
COMM.

CENTER &
PARK
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
6 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING
O.I.D
M.I.D. MAIN CANAL 150'R/W
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
1" = 600'
7 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 12/31/24
- MICRO-SURFACING
JOB NO.

SCALE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

SHEET OF
440 S. Yosemite Avenue, Suite A
Oakdale, CA 95361
Phone: (209) 847-8726
www.Ardurra.com
NWP
22167
WFK
N/A
8 PAVEMENT RESTORATION PROJECT
STREET INDEX - 2023

RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
8 4'
3'

Page 1 of 2 ends

Item 9.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/24

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.3
SECTION 9: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Acceptance of the Topeka Street Improvement Project and Authorization to File a Notice of Completion
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Kathleen Cleek, Development Services Administration Manager Laura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council accept the completion of the Topeka Street Improvement Project and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion.

SUMMARY:

Consolidated Engineering Inc. completed the construction of the Topeka Street Improvement Project. William Kull, City Engineer and City staff have completed a final inspection and determined that construction has been completed per the plans and specifications.

The contract was awarded on June 27, 2023 to Consolidated Engineering Inc. in the amount of $481,684.15. Four contract change orders were issued for this project in the amount of $56,592.95. The total cost of construction is $538,277.10.

It is recommended that the Council accept the Topeka Street Improvement Project as complete and authorize the Senior Project Coordinator to record the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding has been programmed for this project with SB 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Funds, $453,060.10 and from Sewer Funds in the amount of $85,217.00.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Item 9.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/24
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Notice of Completion

2. Before & After Photos

3. Site Map

CITY OF RIVERBANK
ATTN: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES6707 THIRD STREETRIVERBANK, CA 95367 City of Riverbank
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
X
N/A
N/A

CITY OF RIVERBANK
Exempt from Recording Fees (Per Government Code Section 27388.1) February 27, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
Riverbank Stanislaus California
Stanislaus California
Riverbank
City of RiverbankLaura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator Consolidated Engineering Inc.

Topeka Street Improvement Project
Topeka Street between Jackson Ave and Callander Ave
27th February 2024
City of RiverbankLaura Graybill, Senior Project Coordinator 27th February 2024
asphalt grinding & paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, striping, traffic control, sewer pipeline, storm catch basin, and all other work included on the plans.

Riverbank, CA 95367
Topeka Street Improvement Project
Photos
ATTACHMENT 2
Site Map
Topeka Street Improvement Project
ATTACHMENT 3

Page 1 of 2 ends

Item 9.4 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL/ LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.4
SECTION 9: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Public Works Construction Standards: Resolution to Replace in its Entirety CITY OF RIVERBANK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS – Design Standards and Standard Plans for Section 5 - Water From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Cody Bridgewater, Director of Public Works/LRA Director

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution to replace in its entirety the CITY OF RIVERBANK STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS – Design Standards and Standard Plans for Section 5 – WATER. These standards are updated to provide increased protection to the City water system.

SUMMARY
The City of Riverbank’s current Standard Specifications consist of 8 Sections. Section 1 – Preface, Section 2 – Safety, Section 3 – Streets, Section 4 – Lighting, Section 5 – Water, Section 6- Wastewater, Section 7 – Storm Drains, Section 8 – Parking. The standards in these Sections were adopted to aid all persons engaged in construction of public works projects within the city limits of Riverbank. All construction work in the public right-of-way within the City of Riverbank shall conform to these standards. As the construction industry and design parameters change, revisions to these standards need to be adopted.

Section 5 – Water has been revised in its entirety to solidify installation and testing procedures for the City’s water system. Significant updates have been made to the disinfection and testing procedures to provide increased protection to the City water system.

STRATEGIC PLAN
The revisions and addition to the City of Riverbank’s STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS meets the City’s goal to maintain and improve the City’s infrastructure and service delivery systems.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Item 9.4 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact associated with the adoption of this Resolution.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution 2024-XXX

2. City of Riverbank Design Standards – Water

Page 1 of 1 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/24
CC Resolution 2024-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2024-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK,

CALIFORNIA, TO REPLACE IN ITS ENTIRETY CITY OF RIVERBANK STANDARD

SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN STANDARDS AND STANDARD PLANS FOR SECTION 5 – WATER

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the City of Riverbank staff reviewed the standard specifications and drawings within Section 5 – Water and determined new specifications and drawings were needed to provide increased protection to the City water system.

WHEREAS, the City of Riverbank’s Standard Specifications - Design Standards and Standard Plans Section 5 – Water is replaced in its entirety.

WHEREAS, these standards are updated to solidify installation and testing procedures for the City’s water system.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby agrees to adopt Resolution to replace it its entirety the City of Riverbank Standard Specifications – Design Standards and Standard Plans for Section 5 – Water.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of February, 2024; motioned by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember , and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of :

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez Richard D. O’Brien
City Clerk Mayor
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Riverbank

CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
WATER
ATTACHMENT 2
SECTION 5: DOMESTIC WATER FACILITIES
General: Domestic water facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordance with these Construction Specifications and as shown on the plans.

Payment: Full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment, excavating, backfilling, testing, disinfecting and flushing and for doing all work involved in installing the water system shown on the plans and as specified in these Construction Specifications shall be included in the appropriate contract item and no additional compensation will be allowed therefore.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5.100 Materials

5.101 Water Main Pipe

5.102 Miscellaneous Fittings

5.103 Valves

5.104 Service Lines & Fittings

5.105 Fire Hydrants

5.106 Backflow Prevention Devices

5.200 Installation

5.201 General Requirements

5.202 Inspection

5.203 Disinfection

5.204 Connections to Existing Water Mains

5.205 Connection Details

5.206 PVC Pipe

5.300Testing

5.301 Pressure Test

5.302 Bacteriological Test

5.303 Final Connections to Existing Mains

5.304 Backflow Certification

5.100 Materials

5.101 Water Main Pipe
Water main pipe 4” through 12” shall be either ductile iron pipe (DIP) conforming to the requirements of AWWA Standard C-151, Class 51 (4”) or Class 50 (6” thru 12”) with cement-mortar lining per AWWA C-104, and polyethylene encased per AWWA C-105, or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe conforming to the requirements of AWWA Standard C-900, Cast Iron (CI) O.D. Class 150 (DR18) with elastomeric gasket (solvent weld is unacceptable). DIP shall have “Tyton” joints, “Tyseal” joints, or approved equal.

In addition to the above, the following requirements apply to all pipe joints:
• Solvent welded PVC is not allowed
• Mechanical joints are only allowed at fittings
• Cast-iron repair/adapter couplings may be used where approved by the City Engineer
• Water service lines shall be per Section 5.103 of these specifications

5.102 Miscellaneous Fittings
Pipe fittings shall conform to AWWA Standard C110, latest revision, and shall be of ductile iron, match the make of pipe used, and be as specified by the manufacturer for use with the pipe specified. Joints in fittings and adapters shall be of the type with a seal ring groove for positively holding the rubber gaskets in place against the water pressure and shall be similar to the specified joint for the pipe used.

All ductile iron fittings shall be coated outside and inside with a bituminous coating as per Section 10-3 of AWWA Standard C110, latest revision.

Flanged fittings are allowed, and shall be used where shown on the plans.

Mechanical joint fittings are allowed provided the Contractor follows proper assembly procedures.

Not all pipe fittings required to do the work are shown on the plans. The Contractor shall furnish and install all fittings as necessary to accomplish grade and adjustment changes in conformance with the pipe manufacturer’s recommendations and as approved by the Engineer.

5.103 Valves
Valves 2” through 12” valves shall be resilient seated gate valves. Valves over 12” shall be butterfly valves. Resilient seated gate valves shall be Mueller RS, American Flow Control 2500, Clow RS or approved equal and shall conform to the requirements of AWWA Standard C509, latest revision.

Butterfly valves shall be MH 450, Mueller Lineseal III, Clow 450 or approved equal and shall conform to the requirements of AWWA Standard C504, latest revision.

All valves shall open left (clockwise to close) and be equipped with a 2-inch AWWA operating nut. All valves shall be coated for buried service per AWWA Standards. All valves shall be Class 150 minimum.

Valves requiring operating wrenches exceeding 4 feet in length shall have extensions and guides as provided by the valve manufacturer installed in the valve riser.

The valve boxes shall be Christy G5 with cast iron cover and extensions and shall conform to City of Riverbank Standard Details. Cover shall have a free fit in the box. All valve boxes shall be adjusted to grade by the paving contractor as per the appropriate Standard Plan.

5.104 Service Lines and Fittings
Service lines and fittings shall be polyethylene CTS or copper for services 3 inches and smaller and ductile iron or polyethylene for services 4 inches and larger. All water services shall conform to the requirements shown on the appropriate Standard Details.

5.105 Fire Hydrants
Fire hydrants shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Standard Details.

5.106 Backflow Prevention Devices
Backflow prevention devices including double detector checks and reduced pressure principle devices, shall be of a type approved by University of Southern California Foundation for Cross-Connection Control and Hydraulic Research Foundation (USC Foundation), and installed according to the manufacturer’s specifications.

5.200 Installation
Water main pipe shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, City Standard Plans, these Special Provisions and the improvement plans.

5.201 General Requirements:

Water mains shall be installed with due regard for protection from sanitary hazards, including current spacing and crossing requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 22. Minimum pipe cover shall be 3 feet.

Thrust blocking shall be installed per City Standard Details at all bends, tees, dead ends, and changes in pipe diameter. Thrust blocking shall be placed so that the joints of the pipe and fittings will be accessible for repair.

No piping shall be directly embedded in concrete. All pipe in concrete shall be wrapped in 20 mil visquine. All piping subject to corrosion shall be protected with 20 mil visquine over lap ends to be secured with compatible adhesive tape.

Trench width shall be 1.25 times the outside diameter of the pipe plus 12”, or outside diameter of the pipe plus 16”, whichever is greater.

The Contractor shall also take the necessary precautions to protect workers from asbestos fiber hazards. Reference is made to AWWA Manual M-16, “Work Practices for Asbestos-Cement Pipe.” Use of any “non-recommended work practices” such as cutting any AC pipe with abrasive disc-dry tools is strictly forbidden.

Reference is made to AWWA Manual M23 “PVC Pipe - Design and Installation” and AWWA Standards C603 “Installation of Asbestos Cement Water Pipe”, C600 “Installation of Gray and Ductile Cast-Iron Water Mains and Appurtenances”, and C601 “Disinfecting Water Mains”, and applicable California Department of Health Waterworks Standards.

The pipe must be kept exceptionally clean, and shall be protected from contamination during installation.

The City takes no responsibility for water quality downstream of temporary connections to the water system.

Hydrants installed but not in service shall be wrapped with burlap and wired and remain so until such time as the hydrants are in service. Holes may be cut in the burlap in order that the hydrant may be used for construction water.

5.202 Inspection
All water lines shall be inspected for proper installation by the City Engineer, prior to backfilling of trenches. If work is to be completed after normal business hours, Contractor shall call 209-869-3671 to arrange for an inspection to be made after normal business hours.

5.203 Disinfection
Refer to Section 5.302.5 “Disinfection Procedures”

5.204 Connections to Existing Water Mains
Under no circumstances shall anyone other than a representative of the City of Riverbank Public Works Department open or close any valve in the existing City water system. Requests for valve operation shall be made to the Engineer at least 48 hours in advance. In cases where customer service will be interrupted, the request shall be made at least 48 hours in advance and the Contractor shall make satisfactory preparation for the planned work to minimize the interruption.

The procedure shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the start of construction.

5.205 Connection Details
Shall be made per the appropriate Standard Detail(s). The number and location of temporary connections with meter assembly shall be approved by the City Engineer.

Upon request, the City will open its valve to the new pipe after the mains and services have been installed and backfilled and thrust blocks have cured for 48 hours.

5.206 PVC Pipe
Shall not be bent more than as recommended by the manufacturer. Joint deflections are not allowed. The Contractor shall take extra precautions to follow the pipe manufacturer’s recommendations regarding rubber rings, fittings, tapping and installation practices.

5.300 Testing:

Official test for acceptance shall normally be conducted after all backfill placed, and compacted as specified elsewhere in this specification has been completed.

5.301 Pressure Test
All piping shall be tested to a pressure of 150 pounds per square inch (psi). All material, equipment and labor for testing shall be approved by the City prior to testing and shall be furnished without cost to the City of Riverbank. The system will be tested as directed by the Engineer as a unit or in sections not to exceed 1,000 lineal feet. Each unit tested shall successfully meet the requirements herein specified. The water services shall be considered as part of the main for test purposes and no allowance for additional make-up water shall be made.

Unless otherwise directed by the Engineer, testing shall be accomplished by opening hydrants and service line cocks at the high points of the system and blowoffs at all dead ends. The valve controlling the admission of water into the section of pipe to be tested should be opened slowly and fully before closing the hydrants or blowoffs. After the system has been filled with water and all air expelled, all the valves controlling the section to be tested shall be closed, and the line remain in this condition for a period of not less than 24 hours.

The pipe shall then be refilled, if necessary, and subjected to a maintained pressure of not less than 150 pounds per square inch (psi) for a period of one hour.

Allowable make-up water allowance shall not exceed a rate in gallons per hour per 1000’ lineal feet of pipeline of 0.25 multiplied by the pipe diameter in inches. (gph per 1000’ < 0.25 * pipe dia).

All leaks that are found shall be immediately corrected and the system again subjected to the same test.

All repairs of any damage to the pipes and their appurtenances, or to any other structures, resulting from or caused by these tests, shall be performed by the Contractor as the Engineer may direct, all without cost to the City of Riverbank.

5.302 Bacteriological Test

5.302.1 Pipe Assembly Methods
All piping, valves, fittings, and appurtenances which become contaminated during installation shall be cleaned, rinsed with potable water, and then sprayed or swabbed with a 5% sodium hypochlorite disinfecting solution prior to installation, with City representative present. Pipes, fittings, valves, and all other components incorporated into connections with the City’s existing system shall be spray disinfected or swabbed with a liquid chlorine solution in accordance with AWWA C651 and as specified herein.

5.302.2 Flushing Flowrates
Required Flow to Flush Pipelines
Pipe
diameter
Flow Required to Produce 3 ft.
/sec Velocity minimum in Main*
(Inches) (GPM)
4 120
6 260
8 470
10 730
12 1060
16 1880
*(40 psi Residual Pressure in Water Main)

5.302.3 Materials
A. SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE (LIQUID).

Sodium hypochlorite is available in liquid form in glass or plastic containers, ranging in size from 1 qt. to 5 Gal. The solution contains approximately 10% to 15% available chlorine.

B. GRANULAR HYPOCHLORITE
Granular hypochlorite may be used when mixed into a solution containing approximately 10% to 15% available chlorine. When using granular hypochlorite in solution, follow the procedure for sodium hypochlorite solution in this section.

5.302.4 Chlorination Methods
A. SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION (LIQUID)
Sodium hypochlorite solution 1% minimum shall be used for cleaning and swabbing piping and appurtenances immediately prior to installation and for disinfecting all components of connections to the City’s existing system.

Sodium hypochlorite solution may be used for the initial disinfection of newly installed water mains. The solution shall be applied at a terminus of the system to be chlorinated using an injector which can adjust the amount of solution being injected into the piping system. The solution shall be injected at the appropriate concentration to achieve the specified concentration range of chlorine throughout the entire piping system. If the system is greater than 1000 feet in length, the contractor may use a secondary chlorine injection site (e.g. hydrant, etc.). Where pumping equipment is used in conjunction with an injector, an integral backflow prevention device shall be installed and connected to the potable water supply.

Pumping equipment, piping, appurtenances, and all other equipment in contact with potable water shall be disinfected prior to use. Water trucks shall not be used for disinfection of pipelines.

Sodium hypochlorite solution may also be used to increase the total chlorine residual if the concentration from the initial chlorination of the system is found to be low. The solution shall be added to the system in sufficient amounts at appropriate locations to ensure that the disinfecting solution is present at a concentration within the specified range (50 to 100 mg/L) throughout the piping system.

5.302.5 Disinfection Procedures
The pipeline shall be filled at a rate not to exceed 300 GPM or a velocity of 1 foot per second (156 GPM in an 8-inch pipe), whichever is less.

At a point not more than 10 feet downstream from the beginning of the new main, dose the water entering the new main with chlorine fed at a constant rate such that the water will have not less than 50 mg/L and no more than 100 mg/L free chlorine. Measure the chlorine concentration at regular intervals to ensure that this concentration is provided. Measure chlorine in accordance with the procedures described in the current edition of the AWWA Manual M12 or of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater or with a calibrated digital high range Colorimeter.

Disinfection shall result in an initial total chlorine concentration of 50 ppm to 100 ppm. This concentration shall be evenly distributed throughout the system to be disinfected.

All valves shall be operated with the disinfection solution present in the pipeline. All appurtenances such as air-vacuum relief valves, blowoffs, hydrants, backflow prevention devices, and water service laterals shall be flushed with the treated water for a sufficient length of time to ensure a chlorine concentration within the specified range in all components of each appurtenance.

The Contractor will verify the presence of the disinfection solution throughout the system by sampling and testing for acceptable chlorine concentrations at the various appurtenances and/or at the test ports provided by the Contractor. Areas of the system found to be below the specified chlorine concentration level shall receive additional flushing as noted above and/or additional disinfection solution, as necessary. All testing will be done in the presence of the City representative.

The chlorinated water shall be retained in the system for a minimum of 24 hours. The City representative will test the total chlorine residual by a calibrated digital high range Colorimeter. The system shall contain a total chlorine residual of not less than 80% of the initial total chlorine residual before the 24-hour soaking period began. If the total chlorine residual has decreased more than 20%, the system may be soaked for an additional 24- hour period as determined by the City representative. If the total chlorine residual has not deceased after this additional 24-hour period, as determined by a calibrated digital high range Colorimeter, the system shall be flushed in accordance with the procedure detailed herein. If the total chlorine residual has decreased, as determined by a calibrated digital high range Colorimeter, the system shall be flushed in accordance with the procedure detailed herein and shall be re-disinfected. Following a successful retention period as determined by the City representative, the chlorinated water shall be flushed from the system at its extremities and at each appurtenance, using potable water from a source designated by the City. The minimum water velocity during flushing shall be 3 feet per second or as directed by the City.

Flushing shall continue until the replacement water in the new system is equal in chlorine residual to the potable source of supply as verified by the City representative.

5.302.6 Main Isolation
Potable water may be supplied from a temporary backflow-protected connection to the existing distribution system or other supply approved sources. The cross-connection control device shall be consistent with the degree of hazard for backflow protection of the active distribution system.

The flow shall be at a constant, measured rate into the newly installed water main. In the absence of a meter, approximate the rate by placing a Pitot gauge in the discharge or measuring the time to fill a container of known volume. The main should undergo hydrostatic pressure testing prior to disinfection.

5.302.7 Wet or Flooded Trench Requirements
Water mains under construction that become flooded by storm water, runoff, ground water, or any other sources shall be cleaned by draining and flushing with metered potable water until clear water is evident. Upon completion, the entire main shall be disinfected using a method approved by the City. Bacteriological sampling will also be taken at a minimum of 200 feet intervals. The number and location of sample sites and areas effected by wet trench disinfection shall be determined by the City.

5.302.8 Bacteriological Sampling
A. At the Contractor’s expense, a testing firm will perform bacteriological sampling and testing of all new system installations. The set of samples will include: 24-hr post flush, 48-hr post flush, and 7-Day post flush. The testing methodology employed shall be in accordance with AWWA C651. The Certified Laboratory will analyze the samples for the presence of coliform bacteria, enumerating and confirming members of the coliform group.

B. The evaluation criteria employed by the City for a passing test sample is as follows:

1. Coliform bacteria: no positive sample
If the initial disinfection fails to produce satisfactory bacteriological test results, the pipeline system shall be re-flushed and re-sampled.

If the second set of samples does not produce satisfactory results, the pipeline system shall be re-chlorinated, flushed, and re- sampled.

The chlorination, flushing, and sampling procedure shall continue until satisfactory results are obtained. Upon the second failure of a bacteriological test the contractor shall meet with the City to evaluate failed testing and provide a plan to proceed. Upon the fourth failure of any bacteriological test the contractor shall submit a written plan to the City of further measures to clean pipes and mains that shall include one or more of the following, hydro jetting, pigging, water jetting, air scouring, test for leaks or any other method to physically clean installed mains. All costs associated with additional disinfection, sampling, and flush water will be the responsibility of the Contractor.

5.302.9 Back Flow Disinfection
All backflow devices used to isolate installed mains from existing City Distribution system for chlorination or flushing shall be disinfected while under supervision of City Backflow Test Technician and then said backflow shall be tested by the City Backflow Test Technician.

5.302.10 Sampling Procedures
Upon a successful disinfection, the installed mains shall be flushed until the residual chlorine is equal to that of source water (0.05mg/L maximum).

Source water will then be Bacteriological sampled and tested to certify a baseline for successful testing to follow. A twenty-four (24) hour period between the final flushing and the taking of bacteriological samples is required. No flushing or any movement of water in pipe is allowed during sampling phase. Following the 24-hour period, the Contractor shall have a City approved qualified testing firm take water samples for bacteriological tests. Following another 24 hours the City approved firm shall take additional water samples for bacteriological tests. Water samples for bacteriological tests will be taken again after 5 more days (120 hours), if any one of these tests results in a failure, then the installed mains will be flushed and disinfected again, and this process started again. All sampling shall be done in the presence of the City representative. Contractor shall notify the City representative 48 hours in advance of sampling procedures.

Such tests shall meet CDPH requirements for drinking water standards.

The number and location of such samples will be as directed by the City; however, a minimum of one bacteriological test sample per 500 feet of main, one set from the end of each line, one set from each branch greater than one pipe length, and a minimum of 2 samples per day, per test section, are required. One set of samples are required for two consecutive days, 24 hours apart then again after an additional 120 hours (5 Days). All samples, each day, must indicate absent for total coliform. Failure of any sample will require complete retesting, under these procedures, for seven consecutive days. It is very important that all test results be submitted in writing to the City as soon as available. All sampling and laboratory testing shall be at the Contractor’s expense.

Original report of the test results shall be given directly to the City. Emailing the results to the City is preferable. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to accomplish this task. System connections cannot be scheduled until this report is submitted to the City. All results must be submitted to City Representative no later than three calendar days of sample date or risk resampling all samples. Upon successful completion of bacteriological testing, the pipeline will be accepted for use in the City potable water system; however, standard policy is to accept the water mains for use upon the City giving Notice of Acceptance of completed disinfection. No paving can be performed until disinfection complete and approval given by the City.

It is the sole responsibility of Contractor to construct a water main capable of passing the pressure and leakage test and to affect a disinfection of the water main. The fact that City provides inspection during the construction and testing of the water facilities and receives laboratory testing results does not relieve Contractor's responsibility in this regard.

It's the responsibility of Contractor to prevent the consumption of water for any and all uses from undisinfected mains whether by their workmen, subcontractors or any other person who may come in contact with the water from the undisinfected main.

Contractor shall indemnify and save the City harmless from any suits, claims, or actions brought by any person or persons for, or on account of, any sickness or death sustained or arising out of the consumption of water from the main until final acceptance by the City. The Contractor shall not operate any gate valve on any existing main.

The Contractor shall pay all rental and deposit fees for hydrant backflow meter devices checked out from the City plus charges for water used.

5.302.11 Weekend Work
All weekend work is subject to City approval and any request must be made 48 hours in advance and must include a description of all work to be performed to be considered. In the event it is approved it will be the responsibility of the contractor to pay for all overtime for City staff involved with this work.

5.302.12 Failed Test Requirements
• If chlorine residual drops more than 20% at initial disinfection it will be at the Cities determination that the contractor will be required to flush and disinfect again before continuing with further testing. • After any failed bacteriological test requires contractor to flush and repeat disinfection.
• At any time, the City can require a Heterotrophic Plate Count test at the cost of the contractor.
• Upon second failed bacteriological test contractor shall meet with the City to evaluate failed testing and provide a plan to proceed with approval of the City.
• Fourth failed bacteriological test contractor shall submit a written plan to the City for approval of further measures to clean pipes and mains that shall include one or more of the following: hydro jetting, pigging, water jetting, air scouring or any other method to physically clean installed mains.

5.303 Final Connections to Existing Mains
After notification of passing bacteriological tests, the connections to the existing mains shall be completed by the Contractor per Standard Plan 514. Requests for City valve operation shall be made per these specifications.

Removal of the meter assembly and replacement with the flanged spool shall be accomplished is a sanitary manner in the presence of City representative. The nearest valves on the newly installed main shall be closed to minimize the amount of water that will enter the excavation. No water shall be allowed to reenter the main.

As each connection is made, the main shall be flushed such that the flow is away from the existing water system. Each connection shall be flushed in this manner until the entire new water system is flushed, all under the direction of the Engineer. Burlap wrapping shall be removed from all hydrants. At this point, the City will take over operation of the water system. The contractor will be responsible for the cost of repairing any damage to the system until acceptance by the City Council.

5.304 Backflow Certification
All backflow prevention devices installed shall be certified and tested in accordance with current regulations of the California-Nevada Section of the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Certification shall be provided to the City Public Works Department prior to acceptance of new backflow prevention devices.

In addition, the location of any backflow prevention device shall be field verified with the City Public Works Department, or their appointed representative, prior to installation.

Page 1 of 2 ends

Item 9.5– CC/LRA 02/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.5
SECTION 9: CONSENT CALENDAR
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Resolution Authorizing the Allocation of $44,100 from the General Fund Reserves for Translation Services Related to the River Walk Draft Environmental Impact Report
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council consider allocating $44,100 from the General Fund Reserves for the services related to the translation to Spanish of the River Walk Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR).

SUMMARY
On January 31, 2024 the City released for public review the River Walk DEIR. This document relates to the proposed development project in the unincorporated area of Stanislaus County, adjacent to the City of Riverbank, north of Patterson Road (SR 108), east of McHenry Ave. and approximately two miles northwest of downtown Riverbank.

Several members of the City Council and members of the public have requested that the document be made available in Spanish to facilitate the review by all residents in the City.

The 2020 Census data reflects that approximately 55.5% of the residents in Riverbank are of Hispanic or Latino origin.

Due to the technical nature of the document, a quote for assistance to translate the River Walk Draft Specific Plan and DEIR was requested. The translation of the Specific Plan was approved via the City Manager’s budget amendment authority provided by Resolution 2019-103 which allows the City Manager to make amendments up to $25,000.

This document will be received in the first week of March. The quote for the River Walk DEIR is $44,053.52 which is over and above the City Manager’s authority, therefore this request is being brought forward to the City Council for consideration.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Item 9.5– CC/LRA 02/27/2024

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item directly relates to the City Council’s Strategic Plan goal to “Improve Internal and External Communication” and the Strategic Plan Objective to “Ensure appropriate linguistic translation of materials to engage the City’s Hispanic population.”

FINANCIAL IMPACT
$5,434.80 has been allocated from the General Fund Reserves under the authorization of the City Manager for the translation of the Specific Plan. This item requests an allocation of $44,100 from the General Fund Reserves for the translation of the River Walk DEIR for a total of $49,535 for both documents.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 2024-XXX

2. Translation Proposal: Reliable Translations, Inc.

Page 1 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF $44,100 FROM THE GENERAL FUND

RESERVES FOR TRANSLATION SERVICES RELATED TO THE RIVER WALK

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, in February 2019 the City Council set a Strategic Plan goal to Improve Internal and External Communication; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve that goal a Strategic Plan Objective was set to Ensure appropriate linguistic translation of materials to engage the City’s Hispanic population; and
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2024 the City released the River Walk Specific Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for public review; and WHEREAS, a quote for translation services for the Specific Plan and DEIR documents was obtained from Reliable Translations, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City Manager under the authority provided by Resolution 2019- 103 authorized Reliable Translation, Inc. to proceed with the translation of the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the translation of the DEIR staff is requesting a budget amendment of $44,100 from the General Fund Reserves in order to move forward as it is not within the City Manager’s budget authority.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank does hereby authorize staff to move forward with the translation of the River Walk DEIR and allocates $44,100 to the City Council Professional Services Account from the General Fund Reserves.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of February, 2024; motioned by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of ______:

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-
AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez Richard D. O’Brien
City Clerk Mayor
Attachment: Translation Proposal – Reliable Translations, Inc.

TRANSLATION PROPOSAL
Reliable Translations, Inc.
121 W. Lexington Drive, Suite L-106-D
Glendale, CA 91203
Main Phone: (818) 484-8673
Fax: (818) 484-8637
To: Tammy Alcantor
City of Riverbank
(209) 863-7112 Direct, (209) 869-7101 Office
[email protected]
6707 3rd Street
Riverbank, CA 95367
From: James Marmolejo
Sales Dir
Reliable Translations, Inc.
121 W. Lexington Drive, Suite L106D
Glendale, CA 91203
[email protected]
805 630 6773
Assignment: Translation of the “River Walk Specific Plan Public Draft 1-31-24” and the DEIR Vol 1, which is 794 pages.

Tammy, thank you for requesting pricing for your documents you sent in. Your documents are 100% guaranteed with Reliable Translations. With the original version in Word, you will be all set up to update your translations easily and inexpensively if there are minor changes next year. With the PDF versions, you are set up to immediately load them onto the website so they can be downloaded by the public without having to worry about recipients not having the right foreign language fonts.

This translation project is for the “River Walk Specific Plan Public Draft 1-31-24” and DEIR Vol 1, which is 794 pages.
document. It consists of 38,820, plus 314,668 = 353,488 words. Special pricing is being issued here.

Language Document Fees
Spanish “River Walk Specific Plan Public Draft 1-31-24” – 38,820 Words $5,434.80 DEIR Vol 1, which is 794 pages – 314,668 Words $44,053.52 Total Fees $49,488.32
This is for a thoroughly professional translation, proofed and ready to go. Delivery includes MS Word and PDF versions of each language translation.

Turnaround by March 1, 2024, on the smaller document, we will discuss the 794-page document to define the exact delivery time, if we have your consent to proceed forward.

We do not use ANY shortcuts to save time on a translation and we GUARANTEE EVERY TRANSLATION 100% to your satisfaction.

ATTACHMENT 2
We will retain the formatting of the original as closely as possible, other than using language- specific fonts as needed, and the various languages will be running a bit longer or shorter than the English depending on the language.

For translations, we do not allow cancellations since we are obligated to pay the translator in full for translation once assigned.

Payment – As a regular client, we will complete your documents and send an invoice to the City of Riverbank after it is completed.

You can contact me at 805-630-6773 or by email. Looking forward to hearing from you or any further questions, Best regards,
James Marmolejo
805-630-6773

Page 1 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

IVERBANK CITY COUNCIL/ LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.1
SECTION 10: PUBLIC HEARING
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Resolution Approving the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Amendments
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Tammy Alcantor, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Amendments.

SUMMARY
The Finance Department has performed a mid-year review of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget and is recommending the following: 1) budget amendments based on actual beginning reserve changes and, 2) amendments based on revenue and expenditure trends and department requests.

BACKGROUND
On June 27, 2023 the City Council adopted the FY 2023-24 Annual Operating Budget.

This operating budget was prepared using estimates and projections on anticipated revenues and expenditures and was the result of the collaboration of all of the City’s departments. For the General Fund, the City Council approved a budget reflecting a structural deficit where expenditures were projected to exceed revenues by $493,816 and was projected to end with a reserve of 36%.

An important component of a mid-year budget evaluation is determining whether projections made during the preliminary budget adoption continue to remain true as revenues are received, and expenditures have been made. In addition, new information that is received from Stanislaus County and/or the State of California is reviewed for its potential impact on the City’s budget and amendments are requested accordingly.

Page 2 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
The following is a major fund analysis of recommended adjustments to revenues and expenditures highlighting those changes that are of significant impact to the budget. A detailed listing of all funds and accounts being adjusted is attached as Exhibit A.

General Fund (Fund 101)
Revenues
The mid-year review of all General Fund revenues resulted in a recommended net increase of $208,000, the majority of which represents an increase in building permit Revenue. Significant adjustments were made to the following revenue sources:

Account Adjustment Reasoning
Property Tax Current
Secured
$148,000 Increase based on actual assessed
values.

Sales Tax ($445,000) Decrease in taxable retail activities which is being experienced both locally and
statewide.

VLF Swap Property Tax $90,000 Increase based on actual assessed values.

Building Permit Fees $185,000 Increase based on current revenue trend.

Franchise Fees $140,000 Increase based on current revenue trend.

Expenditures
Expenditure reviews consisted of evaluating all accounts to ensure that the original budget would be sufficient to meet anticipated expenditures through the end of the fiscal year. When evaluating accounts Finance has taken into consideration new information affecting expenditure as well as spending trends. This mid-year evaluation (review) has resulted in a recommended net increase in expenditures for the General Fund of $1,113,516.

Below is a listing of only Major expenditure adjustments over $10,000 or staffingrelated adjustment are reflected below, please see Exhibit A for additional recommended adjustments:

Department Adjustment Reasoning
City Manager $25,000 Additional cost for Community
Development Director Recruitment
Legal $1,000,000 Increased Litigation fees due to
Schneider Electric Arbitration
Storm Water Admin $21,945 Repair storm line and sinkhole Oakdale Road
Parks $19,000 Increase in pool chemical cost.
$ 8,000 Increase for replacement park
equipment and repairs.

Page 3 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
With the approved amendments, the General Fund is anticipated to end this fiscal year with a reserve of 44% or approximately $7.0 million. An adjustment of $3.2 million has been reflected to the General Fund’s Beginning Fund Reserve. Mid-year adjustments net ($905,516) with the largest increase in litigation cost.

The General Fund reserve as of June 30, 2024, will be as follows:

Beginning Reserve Amended 07/1/2023 $ 8,819,637
Amended Revenues $14,392,428
Amended Expenditures (includes authorized adj.) $16,166,047 Anticipated Ending Reserve 06/30/2024 $ 7,046,018 (44%) Structural Deficit $1,773,619
General Fund Analysis
The City must take into consideration that the continued increase in expenditures, in most expenditures as well stay mindful the CalPERS Unfunded Liability which is projected to increase by almost $2 million by 2026. Staff have had discussions regarding the implementation of a Section 115 Trust which will allow the City to set-aside funding for future increases to the city’s pension costs, specifically those from CalPERS and will be evaluating the options or the trust account.

Staff continues to recommend that the City Council consider appropriating a portion of the reserve to mitigate the impact of future expenditures (i.e. economic impacts such as COVID, unfunded liability, or capital needs).

Gas Tax Fund (Fund 102)
The Gas Tax Fund receives revenues from a variety of Highway User Taxes collected from the State of California via vehicle fuel purchases. Revenues may only be used to fund Street & Roads related maintenance and project expenses.

Revised revenue projections for the City’s Gas Tax Revenues have been received from the State of California. Updated projections are based on fuel prices experienced and the annual inflationary adjustment to all per-gallon fuel excise taxes. This will result in a decrease of $53,432 being received by the City in Gas Tax and SB1 Funding for projects.

The General Fund subsidy has been adjusted to reflect the loss of revenue.

Expenditures remain steady for the Gas Tax Account which funds important services such as street maintenance repairs, street sweeping, and street light utilities. Mid-year adjustments to expenditures are based on personnel allocation corrections resulting in a decrease in the expenditures and an increase in revenue under the transfers in, with a net result of $0 to the overall budget.

The Gas Tax Fund reserve as of June 30, 2024, will be as follows:

Page 4 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
Beginning Reserve 07/1/2023 Amended $536,394
Amended Revenues $1,919,785
Amended Expenditures $2,461,362
Anticipated Ending Reserve 06/30/2024 $ 5,183 (0%)
Gas Tax Fund Analysis
Unfortunately, operating expenses in this fund continue to outpace the operating Gas Tax Revenues that are received by the city. For this fiscal year, the City’s General Fund will need to subsidize expenditures by approximately $308,500 to ensure that there are sufficient funds to continue maintaining our streets to the highest level possible. For the FY 2024-25, the City will be recommending a possible decrease in services in order to avoid the need for further subsidies.

It is important to note that Reserve funds in the Gas Tax Fund account reflect balances held from the SB1-Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account received from the State of California. These funds are allocated by the City Council via the approval of the SB 1 Expenditure List that is presented to Council on an annual basis. It is normal for this fund to run a deficit as revenues are collected in one fiscal year and projects are completed in another.

Sewer Fund (Fund 106)
The Sewer Fund is a business-type account that has been established to fund the necessary maintenance and improvements of the sewer collection and sewer treatment systems. Revenues are received through user fees from residential, commercial, and industrial entities and may only be used for sewer-related expenditures.

The Sewer Fund beginning reserve projection is being amended to $8,883,444. A significant portion of this reserve is related to Sewer Collection improvements that will be made in future years.

Sewer revenue projections for the current fiscal year have been decreased by $50,000 due to a decrease in industrial permit revenues.

Sewer Expenditures were decreased by $21,526 which is primarily changes in personnel cost incorrectly allocated in the adopted budget.

Overall, the Sewer Fund is anticipated to end with a reserve of 93% providing funds for future projects and addressing deferred maintenance.

In summary, the Sewer Fund is anticipated to end as follows:

Beginning Reserve Amended 07/1/2023 $8,883,444
Estimated Revenues $5,147,561
Estimated Expenditures** $7,284,670
Anticipated Ending Reserve 06/30/2024 $6,746,335 (93%)

Page 5 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
Water Fund (Fund 114)
The Water Fund is a business-type account that has been established to fund the necessary maintenance and improvements of the water distribution system. Revenues are received through user fees from residential, commercial, and industrial entities and may only be used for water-related expenditures.

The Fiscal Year 2023-24 beginning reserve is being adjusted to $1,122,194. This operating reserve is available for annual ongoing maintenance and operations costs of the Water utility fund.

Overall, the Water Fund is anticipated to end with a reserve of 15% providing funds for future projects and addressing deferred maintenance. For this Fiscal Year the Water Fund continues to run a structural deficit based on original revenue projections. It continues to be a struggle to perform many of the Capital Improvement Projects listed in the adopted Five-Year Rate Study due to the postponement of consumption billing and the continued rise in operating cost of the system.

Water Revenues have no adjustments. Expenditures were adjusted $90,467 due to personnel cost for staff budgeted incorrectly and increase for bad debt accounts.

In summary, the Water Fund is anticipated to end the 2023-24 fiscal year as follows:

Beginning Reserve Amended 07/1/2023 $1,122,194
Estimated Revenues $3,293,500
Estimated Expenditures $3,823,883
Anticipated Ending Reserve 06/30/2024 $ 591,811 (15%)
Due to the shortfall in revenues and the inability to perform the Capital Improvement Projects that were projected within the 2015 Water Rate Study, staff will be recommending a review of our current rates for a possible rate study preparation.

Public Benefit Fund (Fund 230)
In June 2018, the City Council authorized the creation of the Public Benefit Fund. The intent of the fund was to ensure that all cannabis-related revenues were segregated and easily accounted for in a specific fund. In addition to establishing the fund, the City Council developed an expenditure policy which was focused on allocating the funds received for public safety (including police and code enforcement) and other projects that would provide a public benefit, including recreation.

This fund accounts for cannabis revenue which have come directly from the Development Agreements between the City and three cannabis-related businesses in the City.

Currently only two of the cannabis-related business are operating.

Page 6 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
Ongoing costs include the funding of a Sheriff Deputy & Community Resource Officer, leasing of the camera system, and a Neighborhood Improvement Officer position.

For the current fiscal year, the Public Benefit fund status as of June 30, 2024, is as follows:

Beginning Reserve Amended 07/1/2023 $1,452,903
Estimated Revenues $385,000
Estimated Expenditures $571,500
Anticipated Ending Reserve 06/30/2024 $1,266,403 (222%) The only adjustment to the fund was the amended beginning reserve balance.

Public Benefit Fund Analysis
As Development Agreements are re-negotiated there is an impact to revenues that must be taken into consideration. With fixed costs such as the camera project monthly fee and funding for two law enforcement officers, and a Neighborhood Improvement Officer it is important to consider that the City should designate portions of the reserve to ensure continued funding for these on-going costs.

Future impacts to the fund include:

1. The City has approved a fourth Development Agreement with DT California, LLC (DBA: Aeriz) who has proposed a project to be located at the current Cannery site.

Aeriz has requested an amendment to their Development Agreement which will impact revenues if approved.

2. Perfect Union dispensary has been sold to Off the Charts who have applied for a transfer of the development agreement. A date for the reopening has not been confirmed at this time.

OTHER FUND ACTIVITY
Adjustments for revenues for System Development fees have been added based on the current revenue trends.

CONCLUSION
The mid-year budget review is an opportunity for the City Departments to revisit their initial budgets and recommend adjustments based on actual activity that is occurring or on activity that is anticipated to occur. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council approve the mid-year budget amendments as presented in Exhibit A.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Fund Net Revenue
Adjustment
Net Expenditure
Adjustment

Page 7 of 7 ends

Item 10.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
General Fund +$208,000 +$1,113,516
Gas Tax Fund -$117,905 -$117,905
Sewer Fund -$50,000 -$21,526
Water Fund $0 +$90,467
Community Center Fund +$12,500 +$44,900
Fleet Services Fund $0 +$31,897
Recreation Fund +$15,000 +$7,787
Workers’ Comp Liability Fund +$6,831 $0
Water Connection Fee Fund +$17,000 $0
Sewer Connection Fee Fund +$16,000 $0
Sys Dev Fees -Streets/Pub Wrks +$1,100,000 $0
Sys Dev Fees – Water +$750,000 $0

STRATEGIC PLAN
In August 2021, the City Council established a Strategic Plan Goal to “Ensure Financial Stability”. This report addresses this matter.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution 2024-XXX
Exhibit A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments

Page 1 of 1 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 MID-YEAR BUDGET AMENDMENTS

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, as part of the mid-year budget review, staff has projected that all reserve accounts will remain within or above the parameters as initially forecast; and, WHEREAS, certain critical needs for personnel, supplies, programs, and equipment have arisen in certain operational areas; and, WHEREAS, to satisfactorily meet all current needs of the City, it is recommended that the adjustments presented in Exhibit A: FY 2023-2024 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments be approved.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby authorizes the budget adjustments presented in Exhibit A: FY 2023- 2024 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments to satisfactorily meet the needs of our residents.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of February, 2024; motioned by Councilmember ______, seconded by Councilmember ______, and upon roll call was carried by the following vote of ___:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________ ________________________
Gabriela Hernandez Richard D. O’Brien
City Clerk Mayor
Attachments:Exhibit A – Mid Year Budget Adjustments
ATTACHMENT 1
Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended 101: General Fund
Revenues 101-000.000-400.010 Property Tax Current Secured Increase in revenues based on actual Assessed
Value 148,000 1,675,000 1,823,000
101-000.000-400.020 Property Tax Current Unsecured
Increase in revenues based on actual Assessed
Value 45,000 75,000 120,000
101-000.000-400.050 Sales Tax
Decrease in revenues based on current sales tax
trends. (445,000) 5,145,000 4,700,000
101-000.000-400.060 Property Transfer Tax Decrease in real estate market. (35,000) 75,000 40,000 101-000.000-400.190 VLF Swap - Property Tax
Increase in revenues based on actual Assessed
Value 90,000 2,510,000 2,600,000
101-000.000-450.030 Building Permit Fees Increase of building permits 185,000 340,000 525,000 101-000.000-501.000 COPS/SLESA Increase in revenue based on current trend. 50,000 150,000 200,000 101-000.000-600.000 Franchise Fees - Garbage Increase in revenues based on current trend. 140,000 380,000 520,000 101-000.000-675.090 Miscellaneous Revenues Increase in revenues based on current trend. 30,000 20,000 50,000 Net General Fund Revenue Adjustments $ 208,000 $ 10,370,000 $ 10,578,000 General Fund Expenditure Amendments
City Council 0
City Manager
101-402.000-702.032 Professional/Special Serivces
Increase for recruitment of Director of
Development Services 25,000 28,000 53,000
101-402.000-706.015 Employee Functions
Increase for motivation and retention events &
functions 5,000 8,500 13,500
Finance 101-403.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year personnel corrections 500 1,800 2,300 Legal 101-404.000-702.033 Special Counsel Schneider Electric Arbitration & Attorney Costs 1,000,000 516,000 1,516,000 Planning 101-405.000-701.002 Personnel Regular Decrease budget due to Director vacancy (25,000) 352,000 327,000 101-405.000-701.002 Personnel Part Time Increase for Intern hours for REAP project 2,500 0 2,500 Building 101-406-000-701.001 Personnel Overtime Increase based on current trends 1,000 3,000 4,000 101-406.000-702.032 Professional/Special Services Increase use of outside consultants 8,000 30,000 38,000 101-406.000-706.038 Staff Development Increase cost for staff training 2,000 4,000 6,000 101-406.000-706.073 Uniform & Rags Increase uniform cost 800 1,200 2,000 Building Maintenance 101-407.000-706.029 Main of bldg/structures/grds Police Dept Rooftop exhaust fan 3,690 17,000 20,690 101-407.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year personnel corrections 600 300 900 101-407.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Mid-year personnel corrections 4,300 29,300 33,600 101-406.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Mid-year personnel corrections 2,000 8,900 10,900 EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget

Page 1 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
Admin Services 101-408.000-702.032 Professional/Special Service Increase for NextRequest and CPR Training 8,100 98,700 106,800 101-408.000-706.047 Website Increase in Annual fees 3,000 11,700 14,700 Development Services Administration
101-412.000-704.022 Communications Increase based on current trends 1,500 4,500 6,000 101-412.000-706.036 Memberships, Dues, Books, Etc Pavement Management Software annual fees 500 2,000 2,500 101-412.000-706.038 Staff Development Decrease based on current trend (1,000) 8,400 7,400 101-412.000-706.050 Safety Equipment Increase for additional safety equipment 500 200 700 Storm Water Admin 101-413.000-706.029 Main. of Bldg/Structures/Grds Increase based on current trends 4,000 2,250 6,250 101-413.000-707.003 Equipment/Projects Repair storm line and sink hole Oakdale Road 21,945 0 21,945 Parks
101-414.000-701.001 Personnel Regular Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 43,400 332,400 375,800 101-414.000-701.003 Personnel Overtime
Increase based on current trends 3,000 4,500 7,500
101-414.000-701.080 Salary Request
Staff hired split into personnel cost items (82,000) 82,000 0 101-414.000-703.050 Pool Expenses & Chemicals
Increase cost for chemicals 19,000 36,000 55,000
101-414.000-706.029 Main. of Bldg/Structures/Grds
Skatepark Door replacements 6,731 32,000 38,731
101-414.000-706.050 Safety Equipment
Increase based on current trends 400 600 1,000
101-414.000-706.081 DownTown& Water Fall Maint Increase maintenance cost irrigations/trees 2,950 4,000 6,950 101-414.000-707.003 Equipment/Projects Increase for annual equipment replacement 8,000 7,400 15,400 101-414.000-708.005 Medicare Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 700 4,800 5,500 101-414.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 10,400 67,900 78,300 101-414.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 15,000 67,900 82,900 101-414.000-708.009 National Retirement Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 4,500 23,600 28,100 101-414.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 6,500 44,300 50,800 101-414.000-708.012 Deferred Compensation Hired a Parks Maintenance Worker 1,500 10,400 11,900 Recreation 101-459.000-999.000 Transfer Out Increase based on current trends 4,500 725,570 730,070 Net General Fund Expenditure Adjustments $1,113,516 $2,571,120 $3,684,636 Net General Fund Revenue Adjustments $ 208,000
Net General Fund Expenditure Adjustments $1,113,516
Net Effect to the General Fund Reserve ($905,516)

Page 2 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
102: Gas Tax Fund
Revenues 102-000.000-400.140 State Gas Tax 2106 Decrease based on revised State estimates (6,252) 98,430 92,178 102-000.000-400.150 State Gas Tax 2107 Increase based on revised State estimates 10,740 195,540 206,280 102-000.000-400.160 State Gas Tax 2107.5 Decrease based on revised State estimates (1,000) 6,000 5,000 102-000.000-400.170 State Gas Tax 2105 Decrease based on revised State estimates (11,771) 162,796 151,025 102-000.000-400.175 State Gas Tax 2103 Decrease based on revised State estimates (27,334) 245,741 218,407 102-000.000-600.050 SB1-RMRA Revenue Decrease based on revised State estimates (19,315) 613,284 593,969 102-000.000-664.000 Interest Income Increase based on current revenue trends 1,500 750 2,250 102-000.000-699.000 Transfers In
Decrease due to payroll budget corrections and
revised revenue estimates (64,473) 710,949 646,476
Net Gas Tax Fund Revenue Adjustments (117,905) 2,033,490 1,915,585 Expenditures 102-418.000-701.001 Personnel Regular Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (60,050) 511,900 451,850 102-418.000-708.005 Medicare Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (870) 7,400 6,530 102-418.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (11,511) 102,000 90,489 102-418.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (260) 2,100 1,840 102-418.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (30,476) 146,600 116,124 102-418.000-708.009 National Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (4,718) 37,800 33,082 102-418.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (8,070) 68,800 60,730 102-418.000-708.012 Deferred Compensation Mid-year Personnel projections corrections (1,950) 16,300 14,350 Net Gas Tax Fund Expenditure Adjustments (117,905) 892,900 774,995

Page 3 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
106: Sewer Fund
Revenues 106-000.000-675.160 Industrial Permits Revenues Increase based on current revenue trends (50,000) 85,000 35,000 Net Sewer Fund Revenue Adjustments (50,000) 85,000 35,000 Expenditures 106-423.000-701.001 Personnel Regular Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 86,159 109,600 195,759 106-423.000-701.003 Personnel Overtime Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 1,000 1,700 2,700 106-423.000-701.004 Standby Pay Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 3,000 17,000 20,000 106-423.000-706.999
Bad Debts
Closed accounts to collections backlog from
COVID Years 8,000 10,000 18,000
106-423.000-708.005 PERS Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 1,250 1,600 2,850 106-423.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 17,515 21,700 39,215 106-423.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 1,000 500 1,500 106-423.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 16,000 37,900 53,900 106-423.000-708.009 National Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 7,000 9,400 16,400 106-423.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 11,600 14,700 26,300 106-423.000-708.012 Deferred Compensation Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 2,950 3,900 6,850 106-423.00-999.000 Transfers Out Based on personnel changes/corrections (185,000) 1,940,652 1,755,652 106-424.000-701.004 Standby Pay Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 7,500 7,000 14,500 106-424.000-702.032 Professional/Special Services Transfer budget to 706.029 (20,000) 175,000 155,000 106-424.000-706.029 Main of Bldg/Structures/Grds Transfer budget from 702.032 20,000 30,000 50,000 106-424.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 500 1,000 1,500 Net Sewer Fund Expenditure Adjustments (21,526) 2,381,652 2,360,126

Page 4 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
114: Water Fund
Revenues
Net Water Fund Revenue Adjustments 0 0 0
Expenditures 114-433.000-701.001 Personnel Regular Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 52,214 392,600 444,814 114-433.000-702.032 Professional/Special Service Budget Transfer to 706.028 (10,000) 306,400 296,400 114-433.000-706.028 Small Tools Budget Transfer from 702.032 10,000 2,500 12,500 114-433.000-706.056 State/County Fees Increase in State fees 2,500 39,000 41,500 114-433.000-706.999 Bad Debt
Closed accounts to collections backlog from
COVID Years 5,000 10,000 15,000
114-433.000-708.005 Medicare Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 757 5,700 6,457 114-433.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 10,008 82,600 92,608 114-433.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 259 1,600 1,859 114-433.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 6,044 74,400 80,444 114-433.000-708.009 National Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 4,719 28,300 33,019 114-433.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 7,016 52,800 59,816 114-433.000-708.012 Deferred Compensation Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 1,950 12,400 14,350 Net Water Fund Expenditure Adjustments 90,467 1,008,300 1,098,767

Page 5 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
118: Community Center Fund
Revenues 118-000.000-680.002 Contract Programs Based on current revenue trends 8,000 22,000 30,000 118-000.000-699.000 Transfers In Increase due to expenditure inceases 4,500 28,850 33,350 Net Community Center Fund Revenue Adjustments 12,500 50,850 63,350 0 Expenditures 118-441.000-701.002 Personnel Part Time Rentals Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 10,000 25,000 35,000 118-441.000-703.030 Contract Programs Increase based on current trends 2,000 9,000 11,000 118-441.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 500 0 500 118-441.008-703.066 JMP Parking Expenses
Increase for safe tree cuts, increase security cost,
increase park host 32,400 75,000 107,400
Net Community Center Fund Expenditure Adjustments 44,900 109,000 153,900 119: Fleet Services Fund
Expenditures 119-442.000-702.030 Maint Operation Equip Increase based on unanticipated repairs 15,000 8,000 23,000 119-442.000-706.026 Miscellaneous Expense Increase based increase cost 2,500 2,000 4,500 119-442.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Mid-year Personnel projections corrections 14,397 100 14,497 Net Fleet Services Fund Expenditure Adjustments 31,897 10,100 41,997 134: Recreation Fund
Revenues 134-000.000-672.000 Pool Revenue Based on current revenue trends 5,000 54,000 59,000 134-000.000-680.001 Program Revenue Based on current revenue trends 10,000 42,000 52,000 134-000.000-699.000
Net Recreation Fund Revenue Adjustments 15,000 96,000 111,000 Expenditures 134-459.000-701.001 Personnel Regular Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 42,700 274,300 317,000 134-459.000-701.080 Salary Request Recreation Admin Clerk position filled (88,700) 92,500 3,800 134-459.000-704.021 Utilities Correction to budget 1,000 0 1,000 134-459.000-706.027 Boot & Jacket Allowance
Increase to maintain on-hand inventory of
uniforms 5,500 1,000 6,500
134-459.000-706.037 Conferences & Meetings Increase to enable staff professional development 3,500 3,500 7,000 134-459.000-708.005 Medicare Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 615 4,000 4,615 134-459.000-708.006 PERS Retirement Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 8,175 56,000 64,175 134-459.000-708.007 Payroll Taxes Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 260 13,800 14,060 134-459.000-708.008 Health Dental Vision Insurance Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 22,332 66,400 88,732 134-459.000-708.009 National Retirement Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 4,725 14,200 18,925 134-459.000-708.010 Self Ins. Premium Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 5,730 36,900 42,630 134-459.000-708.012 Deferred Compensation Recreation Admin Clerk position filled 1,950 7,200 9,150 Net Recreation Fund Expenditures Adjustments 7,787 569,800 577,587 137: Workers Comp Liability Fund
Revenues 137-000.000-675.445 Premium Rebate Rebate of previous years premium savings 6,831 0 6,831 Net Workers Comp Liability Fund Revenue Adjustments 6,831 0 6,831

Page 6 of 7 ends

Fund Account Account Name Amendment Justification Amendment Original Amended EXHIBIT A: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments
Budget
157: Water Connection Fee Fund
Revenues 157-000.000-600.150 Water Connection Fees Based on current revenue trends 12,000 50,000 62,000 157-000.000-664.000 Interest Income Based on current revenue trends 5,000 1,500 6,500 Net Water Connection Fund Revenue Adjustments 17,000 51,500 68,500 158: Sewer Connection Fee Fund
Revenues 158-000.000-660.050 Sewer Connection Fees Based on current revenue trends 16,000 45,000 61,000 Net Sewer Connection Fund Revenue Adjustments 16,000 45,000 61,000 Expenses
Net Sewer Connection Fund Expenditures Adjustments 0 0 0 205: Sys Dev Fees-Streets/Pub Wrks
Revenues 205-000.000-675.330 Developer Fees Based on current revenue trends 1,100,000 350,000 1,450,000 Net SDF Streets/Pub Wrks Fund Revenue Adjustments 1,100,000 350,000 1,450,000 Expenses
Net SDF Streets/Pub Wrks Fund Expenditures Adjustments 0 0 0 206: Sys Dev Fees-Water
Revenues 206-000.000-675.330 Developer Fees Based on current revenue trends 750,000 125,000 875,000 Net SDF Water Fund Revenue Adjustments 750,000 125,000 875,000 Expenses
Net SDF Water Fund Expenditures Adjustments 0 0 0

Page 7 of 7 ends
Page 1 of 3 ends

Item 11.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.1
SECTION 11: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: A Resolution of Concurrence and Support for the Approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Action Plan (AAP)
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Lety Ibanez, Housing Specialist

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council open the Community Meeting, accept Public Comment, and consider adopting a Resolution of Concurrence and support for the approval of the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Action Plan (AAP).

SUMMARY
The adoption of the Annual Action Plan (AAP) is a requirement of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for jurisdictions that receive and administer certain HUD block grants on an entitlement basis.

BACKGROUND
In June 2019, the City became part of the Stanislaus County Urban County (“Urban County”) and HOME Consortium for a direct allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership funding from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Every year the Urban County and HOME Consortium are required to prepare an Annual Action Plan which discusses the projects that will be undertaken by the entities in the Urban County and the Consortium in the upcoming year. It is recommended that the City Council hold a Community Meeting to accept public comments on the Draft Annual Action Plan and consider adoption of a Resolution of Concurrence.

The City is only permitted to use this funding within census tracts that reflect a 51% or greater low/moderate income level. The following, gray-shaded areas reflect those census tracts where projects may be undertaken:

Page 2 of 3 ends

Item 11.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
Status of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Action Plan (AAP) For Fiscal Year 2020-21, the city programmed its funding for the Castleberg Park Trail & ADA upgrades. At the City Council meeting of March 14, 2023, the project was awarded to Consolidated Engineering Inc. The project has been completed as of September 12, 2023. The project had an allocation of $161,346 of CDBG funding with additional funding from Fund 156 – Assessment District Fund.

For Fiscal Year 2021-22, the city allocated an additional $112,000 of its funding for Castleberg Park ADA Improvements to avoid losing the funding. The remaining funding allocation of $61,758 has been allocated for the Preliminary Engineering & Design of the Water and Sewer Line Replacement project to be completed in April 2024.

For Fiscal Years 2023-24 & 2024-25 the city has programmed $329,471 of its funding for a Water Line Installation in the alley on Riverside from Corporation Yard to 4th Street.

Once the preliminary engineering scope is completed, the city will need to complete the NEPA/Environmental review on the proposed project in the Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024 -25.

FiscalYear 2024-25Annual Action Plan (AAP)

Page 3 of 3 ends

Item 11.1 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
The AAP is an integral component of the Urban County's Consolidated Plan and describes the specific programs and projects that will be undertaken during Fiscal Year 2023-24 and 2024-25. For Fiscal Year 2024-25, The City of Riverbank allocation of estimated CDBG funds is $160,234 ($150,074 for CDBG project activities and $10,160 to administer) for infrastructure projects:

Project Location Cost Estimate
Water and Sewer Line
Replacement
In Alley on Riverside Dr.&
High St, from 3017 High St to
Fourth St.
$771,000
Total estimated project cost: $771,000

STRATEGIC PLAN
This report is in conformance with the City of Riverbank’s Strategic Plan goal to “Maintain a High Quality of Life”.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
CDBG funds from FY 2020-21and FY 2021-22 in the amount of $242,941.69 have been expended for Castleberg Park Trail/ADA Improvements. The remaining funds from FY 2021-22, $61,758, and all funds for FY 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25 have been allocated to the Water and Sewer Line Replacement project. At this time HUD has announced an estimated amount of $160,234 ($150,074 for CDBG project activities and $10,160 to administer) for infrastructure projects.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution 2024-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA, OF CONCURRENCE AND SUPPORT OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024- 2025 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (AAP) PREPARED BY THE STANISLAUS COUNTY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CONSORTIUM
WHEREAS, The Stanislaus County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consortium which includes the cities of Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Waterford and unincorporated areas of Stanislaus County has been granted an estimated allocation of $2,335,030 CDBG funds from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and
WHEREAS, the Stanislaus County CDBG Consortium is required by HUD to prepare an Annual Action Plan (AAP) to document progress made in accomplishing goals set forth in the Consolidated Plan and Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the planning process serves as the framework for the community-wide dialogue to identify housing and community development priorities that align and focus funding from programs such as CPD formula block grant programs; the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) Program, and the Emergency solutions Grant (ESG) Program; and the City of Riverbank estimated allocation of CDBG funds is $160,234 ($150,074 for CDBG project activities and $10,160 to administer) for 2024-2025 Fiscal Year; and WHEREAS, the following project(s) listed below have been selected as CDBG projects according to low to moderate income eligibility and existing health and safety issues in the project area(s) for Fiscal Year 2024-2025:

Project Location Cost Estimate
Water Line Installation
Alley between Riverside Drive
and High Street,
from 3017 High Street to 4th
Street
$771, 000
(In addition to funding from
FY 21-22 & 22-23)
Total estimate project cost $771,000
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby adopts the Resolution of Concurrence and Support of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Annual Action Plan prepared by the Stanislaus County Community Development Block Grant Consortium.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27
th day of February, 2024; motioned by Councilmember
__________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of _____:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
____________________________ _________________ _________ Gabriela Hernandez Richard D. O’Brien
City Clerk Mayor

Page 1 of 3 ends

Item 11.2 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.2
SECTION 11: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Presentation- River Walk Specific Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Miguel Galvez, Contract City Planner

RECOMMENDATION
No formal action by the City Council is required.

SUMMARY
The environmental consultant will be presenting 1) the proposed River Walk Specific Plan, and 2) the Draft EIR to the City Council and members of the public.

This agenda item is not a public hearing no formal action is required.

BACKGROUND
The City published a Notice of Availability to announce that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed River Walk Specific Plan is available for public review from January 31, 2024, through March 18, 2024.

PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT LOCATION: The River Walk Specific Plan is in the unincorporated area of Stanislaus County and adjacent to the City of Riverbank, north of Patterson Road/State Route (SR) 108, east of McHenry Avenue, and approximately two miles northwest of downtown Riverbank.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed River Walk Specific Plan (RWSP) is a MixedUse development project that provides for a range of residential housing densities, neighborhood-scale retail, commercial and health/medical services, private clubhouse,

Page 2 of 3 ends

Item 11.2 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
public recreation, a pedestrian/bicycle trail system, and extensive open space and landscaping. The land uses proposed include: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential, Mixed-Use, and Parks/Recreation, including all infrastructure and utilities necessary to service the development. The RWSP estimates between 2,432 – 2,682 residential units, and 375,000 and 875,000 square feet of MixedUse for commercial, office, service, or retail use, as well as some transitional care facilities. A large portion of the RWSP is intended to be an age-restricted active adult community, while a portion will not be age restricted.

The RWSP requires a Sphere of Influence (SOI) expansion and annexation of land. The SOI expansion covers approximately 1,522 acres. The RWSP covers approximately 997 acres of the SOI expansion area, and includes an annexation into the Riverbank City limits, extension of infrastructure to the annexed area to serve development, and the subsequent development of the annexed area. All other lands that are included within the SOI expansion area, but outside the RWSP area are not proposed for development currently and thus are not included in the RWSP adoption, pre-zoning, or annexation request.

The entitlements requested include a General Plan Amendment, RWSP adoption, prezoning, SOI amendment, Municipal Services Review amendment, annexation, Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Plan (and EV ordinance), vesting tentative map, Development Agreement, and annexation into CFD 2016-01.

For more details regarding the project characteristics, objectives, entitlements, circulation improvements, and utilities improvements, please see Chapter 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR available at: www.riverbank.org/609/River-Walk.

ENVIRONMENTAL
SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: The Draft EIR has identified the following environmental issue areas as having significant and unavoidable environmental impacts from implementation of the project: Aesthetics; Agricultural Resources; Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy; Noise, Public Services, Transportation and Circulation, Utilities, Cumulative Aesthetics; Cumulative Agricultural Resources; Cumulative Air Quality; Cumulative Biological Resources, Cumulative Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change; Cumulative Noise, Cumulative Transportation and Circulation, and Cumulative Utilities. All other environmental issues were determined to have no impact, less than significant impacts, or less than significant impacts with mitigation measures incorporated into the Project.

PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: A 45-day public review period for the RWSP and Draft EIR commenced on January 31, 2024, and will end on March 18, 2024, for interested individuals and public agencies to submit written comments on the documents.

Written comments concerning the RWSP and Draft EIR are due by 5:00 p.m. on March 18, 2024 and should be submitted to the attention of Miguel Galvez, Contract City Planner at the City of Riverbank, 6707 3rd Street, Suite A, Riverbank, CA 95367; or by e-mail to

Page 3 of 3 ends

Item 11.2 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
[email protected]. Comments provided should clearly identify if the comments pertain to the RWSP or the Draft EIR. All comments received on the Draft EIR will be formally addressed in a response to comment contained in a Final EIR. If the city does not receive a response from an agency or organization, The City will presume that the agency or organization has no response to make.

Copies of the Draft EIR can be reviewed at the City of Riverbank, 6707 3rd Street, Riverbank, CA 95367 or 6617 3rd Street, during normal business hours, and online at:
www.riverbank.org/609/River-Walk.

Questions regarding the City of Riverbank’s review of the proposed Project or Draft EIR may be directed to Miguel Galvez, Contract City Planner at the City of Riverbank, 6617 3rd Street, Riverbank, CA 95367; or by e-mail to [email protected].

ATTACHMENTS

1. Presentation-English Version

2. Presentation- Spanish Version
River Walk Specific Plan and Draft EIR Presentation
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Riverbank Community Center
(located at 3600 Sante Fe Street, Riverbank, CA 95367)
February 27, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
• High level overview of the Specific Plan
• Summary of Environmental Analysis in DEIR
• Discussion of Next Steps
• Today’s presentation is NOT a hearing
Purpose of Today’s Presentation
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Location:
• North of Patterson Rd/SR 108, east of McHenry Ave, approximately two miles northwest of downtown Riverbank. • Within the City of Riverbank General Plan Planning Area • Outside the city limits and sphere of influence (SOI).

Project Location
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Location:
• Project Area/SOI Expansion Area – Sphere of Influence Amendment and encompassesthe entire Project area.
• Specific Plan Area - River Walk Specific Plan.
• Berghill Boundary – Areas within the Specific Plan Area that are controlled by the project applicant.
• Active Adult Community – Area within the Berghill Boundary that is located in the lower elevation of the Specific Plan Area. This is an age-restricted development.

Project Boundaries

PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY ACRES (GIS)
Specific Plan Area 993 acres
Berghill Boundary 772 acres
Overall Project area 1,522 acres
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Existing City Land Use Designations:

Existing General Plan

LAND USE ACREAGE
Lower Density Residential 319.55
Medium Density Residential 117.22
Higher Density Residential 17.25
Mixed Use 51.45
Civic 15.79
Park 1.12
Buffer/Greenway/Open Space 129.44
Multi-Use Recreational/Resource 5.31
Agricultural Resource Conservation Area 518.22
Reserve 305.49
ROW/Canal/Not Designated 27.55
Total 1,522.05
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Specific Plan – Chapters
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Chapters
• Chapter 1 – Introduction
• Chapter 2 – Existing Conditions
• Chapter 3 – River Walk Vision
• Chapter 4 – Land Use and Development Standards
• Chapter 5 – Circulation and Mobility
• Chapter 6 – Infrastructure, Parks, and Public Services • Chapter 7 – Design Guidelines
• Chapter 8 – A Community Aging Together
• Chapter 9 – Implementation and Administration
Project Objectives
• Goal 1: Develop a mix of residential housing products to accommodate a variety of desires in the market.
• Goal 2: Prioritize the age-restricted development as a vibrant community with diverse housing types and densities allowing residents to age-in-place. • Goal 3: Develop a community core area that serves as a central community gathering place for social interaction, recreation, retail, services, and living space.
• Goal 4: Promote health and wellness through extensive pedestrian and bicycle trails, outdoor recreation areas, and opportunitiesfor social interaction. • Goal 5: Respect the natural resources (i.e., Stanislaus River), terrain, and character of land by designing a residential community that highlights the scenic views of the Plan Area.
• Goal 6: Achieve a safe and efficient circulation system for all users and modes of transportation.
• Goal 7: Highlight village identity while promoting community amenities.

Project Objectives
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Specific Plan –Amenities
Community Core
Clubhouse
River Walk Trail
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Neighborhood Electric Vehicles
Parks and Open Space
Specific Plan – Village Summary
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

VILLAGE LAND USE AGE

RESTRICTED
LOT
COUNT
A Low Density Residential No 101
B Low Density Residential No 42
C Low Density Residential Yes 254
D Low Density Residential Yes 207
E Low Density Residential Yes 148
F Low Density Residential Yes 173
G Low Density Residential Yes 97
H Medium Density Residential Yes 157
I High Density Residential Yes 180
J Medium Density Residential Yes 227
K Medium Density Residential Yes 318
L Low Density Residential Yes 176
M Low Density Residential Yes 48
N Low Density Residential Yes 29
O Low Density Residential Yes 70
P Low Density Residential No 67
Q Low Density Residential No 108
R Low Density Residential No 30
Total -- -- 2,432
Specific Plan – Circulation
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Existing Transportation Network
• Proposed Circulation Network
• Neighborhood Electric Vehicles Plan
• Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Circulation
Specific Plan – Roadways
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Internal Specific Plan Roadways
o Arterial roadways: Four travel
lanes, sidewalks on both sides of
the street, bike lanes and landscape
strips.
o Collector roadways: Two to four
travel lanes, sidewalks on both
sides of the street, bike lanes where
applicable and landscape strips.
o Local Residential Streets: Two travel
lanes, sidewalk and landscape strips
on both sides.

Adjacent Offsite Arterial Roadways
o McHenry Avenue
o Patterson Road
Specific Plan – NEV Plan
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) are Low
Speed Electric Vehicle (LSEV) that are less than
three thousand pounds and designed to be
operated at not more than 35 mph
• “NEV lanes” or “NEV routes” are for NEV travel
including roadways designated by signs or
permanent markings which are shared with
pedestrians, bicyclists, and other motorists in
the portion of the River Walk Specific Plan Area
designated for active adult living.
• Class I NEV lanes provide a right-of-way separated from a roadway and for the exclusive use of NEVs, and/or shared use with bicyclists, and pedestrians. (River Walk Trail, and Class I bike paths).
• Class II NEV lanes provide a restricted right-of-way on a roadway designated by striping and signage for the
exclusive or semi-exclusive use of NEVs, with through
travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited.
(Coffee Road within the active adult area).
• Class III NEV lanes are lanes on streets with speed limits of forty-five miles per hour or less and are shared with pedestrians, bicyclists, and other motorists. (Local
Residential Streets, Minor Collectors, and portions of
Major Collectors-Coffee Road in the Community Core).

Specific Plan – Bike/Ped
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Specific Plan – Water
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Master Plan includes 12” main lines
• Neighborhoods includes 8” main lines
• 2 million gallon water tank
• 3 Wells
• Pressure Regulating Station
• Existing agricultural irrigation to remain
Specific Plan – Sewer
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Three pump stations (Northeast, South, and West Pump Station). • Gravity flow system - 24”, 18”, 15”, 12”, 10”, and 8” sewer mains • Gravity sewer mains convey wastewater to one of three pump stations, ultimate discharge flows to the Northeast Pump Station. • Offsite sewer line (1.4 miles to the WWTP): 10” force main, and a 16” force main.

Specific Plan – Drainage
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• North Basin: 214-acre watershed with two connected basins totaling 6.2 acres/24.9 ac-ft capacity. Two alternatives: 1) Infiltration trench (French Drains approx. 4,850 LF, 6’Wx8’D), or 2) Pump Station discharge to the Stanislaus River at a flow of 2,365 GPM.
• West Basin: 226-acre watershed with 7.3-acre basin/28.5 acft capacity. Pump Station discharge to the MID Main Canal at a flow of 2,583 GPM.
• East Basin: 231-acre watershed with 5.8-acre basin/25.8 acft capacity. Pump Station discharge to the MID Spenker Drain at a flow of 2,335 GPM.
• South Basin: 68-acre watershed with 1.2-acre basin/6.3 ac-ft capacity. Pump Station discharge to the MID Spenker Drain at a flow of 573 GPM.

Project Entitlements:
• Sphere of Influence Amendment
• Municipal Services Review Update/Amendment,
• General Plan Amendment
• Pre-zoning,
• Annexation,
• Specific Plan,
• Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Plan,
• Vesting Tentative Maps,
• Development Agreement,
• Future: Final Maps, Improvement Plans, Grading Plans, Building Permits, Conditional Use Permits, Site Plan/Design Review.

Project Entitlements Requested
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
General Plan Amendment
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

PROPOSED LAND USE GIS ACRES
BGOS - Bluff 68.53
BGOS - Canal 23.34
BGOS - River Park 69.77
Dual Use Park/Ponding Basin 41.01
HDR 10.02
LDR 467.18
MDR 78.70
Mixed Use 76.76
Park 43.34
Reserve 579.39
Rights of Way 63.37
Total 1,521.41
Pre-zoning
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Specific Plan – Land Use Summary
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

MAP SYMBOL ACREAGE

DENSITY
RANGE

ESTIMATED UNIT OR

SF RANGE
LDR – Low Density
Residential
467.18 0 – 8 du/ac 1,550
MDR – Medium Density
Residential

78.70 8 – 16 du/ac 702
HDR – High Density
Residential

10.02 16 + du/ac 180
MU – Mixed-Use
(outside of community core) 58.39 16 + du/ac 0.25 FAR
0 – 350 du
275,000-635,000 sf
MU – Mixed-Use
(inside of community core) 5.35 16 + du/ac 0.50 FAR
0 – 100 du
110,000-220,000 sf
MU – Mixed-Use
(Clubhouse) 8.01 0.50 FAR 20,000 sf
Park 43.34 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - Bluff 68.53 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - Canal 23.34 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - River Park 69.77 N/A N/A
Park - Ponding Basin 41.01 N/A N/A
Reserve 60.17 N/A N/A
ROW 63.37 N/A N/A
TOTAL 997.18 --
2,432 – 2,682 du
375,000 – 875,000 sf
What is an EIR?
• An informational document describing the anticipated environmental effects of implementing a project, as required by CEQA.
• Acts as a forum for public participation in the environmental review process. • An EIR includes Mitigation Measures to reduce potential adverse environmental impacts. • An EIR does not advocate or promote the project.

Environmental Review Process
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
NOP Public Process
• Circulated NOP on June 4, 2021
• SCH, State Agencies, Local Agencies, Citizens
• Scoping meeting was held on June 17, 2021
• Concerns raised in response to the NOP were considered during preparation of the Draft EIR.

D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
NOP – Areas of Concern
The following concerns were raised during NOP/Scoping Process:
• Loss of productive farmland and productive agricultural soils • Development within a floodplain
• Protection and preservation of potential tribal cultural resources • Increased traffic on local and regional roadways, and site access • Increased operational noise
• Provision of utilities and public services, including construction of infrastructure • Removal of on-site vegetation and species habitat
• Source of water for the proposed Project and potential effects related to groundwater recharge • Elevated sources of greenhouse gas emissions
• Expansion of City’s SOI
• Potential growth inducing impacts
• Potential health-related impacts resulting from criteria pollutant emissions and greenhouse gas emissions
• Potential hazardous release of hazardous materials during construction and operation • Potential hazards associated with residual chemicals from farming D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR - Topics Addressed in EIR
The following environmental topics were analyzed in the Draft EIR:
• Aesthetics and Visual Resources
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural and Tribal Resources
• Geology and Soils
• Greenhouse Gas/Climate/ Energy
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use/Population/Housing
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services and Recreation
• Transportation and Circulation
• Utilities
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR - Alternatives
The following alternatives were analyzed in the Draft EIR:
• No Project (No Build) Alternative: Development of the Plan Area would not occur, and the Plan Area would remain in its current existing condition.
• Increased Density Alternative: The proposed Project would be developed with the same amenities as described in the Project Description, but the density of the residential uses would be increased, and the total development footprint would be equal to the proposed Specific Plan. • Lower Density Alternative: The proposed Project would be developed in such a way to promote larger lot sizes and to reduce the overall footprint of the developed areas. • No Reserve Alternative: The proposed Project would be developed with the same amenities as described in the Project Description, but the Reserve Area located outside the Specific Plan Area would be removed from the Project Area.

D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR – Mitigation
Forty-three Mitigation Measures were created to reduce “Potential Impacts” related to the following topics:
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Geology/Soils
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hazards
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hazards
• Hydrology/Water Quality
• Noise
• Public Facilities
• Transportation and Circulation
• Utilities
DEIR – SU Impacts
Significant and Unavoidable Impacts were identified for the following topics:

Project Impacts
• Aesthetic and Visual Resources
• Agricultural Resources
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Noise
• Public Facilities (construction of new
parks/recreational facilities)
• Transportation and Circulation (VMT)
• Utilities (construction of new utilities)
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Cumulative Impacts
• Aesthetic and Visual Resources
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Climate Change
• Noise
• Public Facilities (construction of new parks/recreational facilities)
• Transportation and Circulation (VMT)
• Utilities (construction of new utilities)
• 45-day public review period ends on
March 18, 2024
• Comments should be submitted in writing:
• By email
• By mail
DEIR – Public Review
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Public Draft EIR - 45-day public review and comment period closes March 18, 2024. • Final EIR - Written responses to comments, and any changes made to the Draft EIR. • Final Specific Plan – Revisions to the text and figures. • Planning Commission and City Council Hearings
• Hearings to Certify the EIR
• Hearings to Consider the Final Specific Plan and Entitlement Requests • LAFCo Hearings
• MSR Update/Amendment
• Hearings to Consider SOI Expansion
• Hearings to Consider Annexation
Next Steps
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
The Draft EIR is available for review at the City of Riverbank. An electronic copy is available on the City’s website
www.riverbank.org/609/River-Walk.

Comments can be sent to Miguel Galvez at:
[email protected]
Or:

Miguel Galvez, Contract City Planner
Planning, City Hall South
6707 3rd Street, Suite A
Riverbank, CA 95367
Key Information
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Presentación de Plan Específico del Paseo del Río y Borrador del EIR D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Centro Comunitario Riverbank
(ubicado en 3600 Santa Fe Street, Riverbank, CA 95367)
27 de febrero de 2024
ATTACHMENT 2
• Resumen de alto nivel del Plan Específico
• Resumen del Análisis Medioambiental en DEIR
• Discusión de los próximos pasos
• La presentación de hoy NO es una audiencia
Propósito de la presentación de hoy
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Ubicación:
• Al norte de Patterson Rd/SR 108, al este de McHenry Ave, aproximadamente a dos millas al noroeste del centro de Riverbank. • Actualmente se encuentra dentro del condado no incorporado de Stanislaus. • Afuera de la Esfera de Influencia de Riverbank (SOI).

Ubicación del Proyecto
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Ubicación:
• Área del Proyecto/Área de Expansión SOI – Enmienda de la Esfera de Influencia y abarca toda el área del Proyecto.
• Área del Plan Específico - Plan Específico del Paseo del Río. • Límite de Berghill - Áreas dentro del Área Específica del Plan que son controladas por el solicitante del proyecto.
• Comunidad de Adultos Activos - Área dentro del Límite de Berghill que se encuentra en la elevación más baja del Área Específica del Plan. Este es un desarrollo restringido por edad.

Límites del Proyecto
LÍMITE DEL ÁREA DE PLANIFICACIÓN ACRES (GIS)
Área específica del plan 993 acres
Límite de Berghill 772 acres
Área general del proyecto 1,522 acres
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Designaciones de uso del suelo
existentes en la ciudad:

Plan General Existente

USO DEL SUELO

SUPERFICIE EN
ACRES
Residencial de menor densidad 319.55
Residencial de densidad media 117.22
Residencial de mayor densidad 17.25
Uso mixto 51.45
Cívico 15.79
Parque 1.12
Zona de influencia/vía verde/espacio abierto 129.44
Recreativo de Usos Múltiples/Recurso 5.31
Área de Conservación de Recursos Agrícolas 518.22
Reserva 305.49
ROW/Canal/No designado 27.55
Total 1,522.05
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Plan Específico – Capítulos
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Capítulos
• Capítulo 1 – Introducción
• Capítulo 2 – Condiciones existentes
• Capítulo 3 – Visión del Paseo del Río
• Capítulo 4 – Normas de uso y desarrollo de la tierra
• Capítulo 5 – Circulación y movilidad
• Capítulo 6 – Infraestructura, Parques y Servicios Públicos • Capítulo 7 – Directrices de diseño
• Capítulo 8 – Una comunidad que envejece junta
• Capítulo 9 – Implementación y administración
Objetivos del Proyecto
• Objetivo 1: Desarrollar una combinación de productos de vivienda residencial para adaptarse a una variedad de deseos en el mercado.
• Objetivo 2: Priorizar el desarrollo con restricción de edad como una comunidad vibrante con diversos tipos y densidades de vivienda que permitan a los residentes envejecer en el lugar.
• Objetivo 3: Desarrollar un área central de la comunidad que sirva como un lugar central de reunión de la comunidad para la interacción social, la recreación, el comercio minorista, los servicios y el espacio vital.
• Objetivo 4: Promover la salud y el bienestar a través de extensos senderos para peatones y bicicletas, áreas de recreación al aire libre y oportunidades para la interacción social.
• Objetivo 5: Respetar los recursos naturales (es decir, el río Stanislaus), el terreno y el carácter de la tierra mediante el diseño de una comunidad residencial que destaque las vistas panorámicas del área del plan.
• Objetivo 6: Lograr un sistema de circulación seguro y eficiente para todos los usuarios y modos de transporte.
• Objetivo 7: Resaltar la identidad de los pueblos al tiempo que se promueven los servicios comunitarios.

Objetivos del Proyecto
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Plan Específico – Amenidades
Núcleo de la comunidad
Clubhouse
Sendero del Paseo del Río
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Vehículos eléctricos del vecindario
Parques y espacios abiertos
Plan Específico – Resumen del Pueblo
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

PUEBLO USO DEL SUELO RESTRINGIDO

POR EDAD

RECUENTO

DE LOTES
A Residencial de baja densidad No 101
B Residencial de baja densidad No 42
C Residencial de baja densidad Sí 254
D Residencial de baja densidad Sí 207
E Residencial de baja densidad Sí 148
F Residencial de baja densidad Sí 173
G Residencial de baja densidad Sí 97
H Residencial de baja densidad Sí 157
I Residencial de alta densidad Sí 180
J Residencial de baja densidad Sí 227
K Residencial de baja densidad Sí 318
L Residencial de baja densidad Sí 176
M Residencial de baja densidad Sí 48
N Residencial de baja densidad Sí 29
O Residencial de baja densidad Sí 70
P Residencial de baja densidad No 67
Q Residencial de baja densidad No 108
R Residencial de baja densidad No 30
Total -- -- 2,432
Plan Específico – Circulación
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Red de transporte existente
• Red de circulación propuesta
• Plan de vehículos eléctricos del vecindario
• Circulación peatonal, ciclista y de
transporte público
Plan Específico – Carreteras
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Plan Interno Específico de Carreteras
• Vías principales: Cuatro carriles de
circulación, aceras a ambos lados de la
calle, carriles bici y franjas ajardinadas.
• Vías colectoras: De dos a cuatro carriles
de circulación, aceras a ambos lados de la
calle, carriles bici cuando corresponda y
franjas ajardinadas.
• Calles residenciales locales: Dos carriles
de circulación, acera y franjas ajardinadas
a ambos lados.
• Carreteras arteriales adyacentes fuera del
sitio.
• McHenry Avenue
• Patterson Road
Plan Específico – Plan NEV
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Los Vehículos Eléctricos de Vecindario (NEV, por
sus siglas en inglés) son vehículos eléctricos de
baja velocidad (LSEV) que pesan menos de tres
mil libras y están diseñados para ser operados a
no más de 35 mph
• Los "carriles NEV" o "rutas NEV" son para viajar
en los NEV, incluidas las carreteras designadas
por letreros o marcas permanentes que se
comparten con peatones, ciclistas y otros
automovilistas en la parte del Área del Plan
Específico del Paseo del Río designada para la
vida activa de adultos.
• Los carriles NEV de Clase I proporcionan un derecho de paso separado de una carretera y para el uso exclusivo de los NEV y/o uso compartido con ciclistas y peatones. (Sendero del Paseo del Río y senderos para bicicletas de Clase I).
• Los carriles NEV de Clase II proporcionan un derecho de paso restringido en una carretera designada por franjas y señalización para el uso exclusivo o semiexclusivo de los NEV, con el tránsito de vehículos motorizados o peatones prohibido. (Coffee Road dentro del área de adultos activos). • Los carriles NEV de Clase III son carriles en calles con límites de velocidad de cuarenta y cinco millas por hora o menos y se comparten con peatones, ciclistas y otros automovilistas. (Calles Residenciales Locales, Colectores Menores y partes de Colectores Mayores-Coffee Road en el Núcleo
Comunitario).

Plan Específico – Bicicleta/Peatones
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Plan Específico – Agua
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• El Plan Maestro incluye líneas principales de
12"
• Los vecindarios incluyen líneas principales de 8"
• Tanque de agua de 2 millones de galones
• 3 Pozos
• Estación reguladora de presión
• Se mantendrá el regadío agrícola existente
Plan Específico – Alcantarillado
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Tres estaciones de bombeo (Estación de Bombeo Noreste, Sur y Oeste).
• Sistema de flujo por gravedad: red de alcantarillado de 24", 18", 15", 12", 10" y 8"
• La red de alcantarillado por gravedad transporta las aguas residuales a una de las tres estaciones de bombeo, la descarga final fluye a la estación de bombeo del noreste.
• Línea de alcantarillado fuera del sitio (1.4 millas hasta la PTAR):
tubería principal de fuerza de 10" y una tubería principal de fuerza de 16".

Plan Específico – Drenaje
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Cuenca Norte: Cuenca hidrográfica de 214 acres con dos cuencas conectadas con un total de 6.2 acres/24.9 acres-pie de capacidad. Dos alternativas: 1) Zanja de infiltración (drenajes franceses aprox. 4,850 LF, 6'Wx8'D), o 2) Estación de bombeo descargando al río Stanislaus a un flujo de 2,365 GPM.
• Cuenca Oeste: Cuenca hidrográfica de 226 acres con cuenca de 7.3 acres/capacidad de 28.5 acres-pie. Descarga de la Estación de Bombeo al Canal Principal MID a un caudal de 2,583 GPM.
• Cuenca Este: Cuenca hidrográfica de 231 acres con cuenca de

5.8 acres/capacidad de 25.8 acres-pie. Descarga de la
estación de bombeo al drenaje MID Spenker a un caudal de 2,335 GPM.
• Cuenca Sur: Cuenca hidrográfica de 68 acres con una cuenca de 1.2 acres / capacidad de 6.3 acres-pie. Descarga de la estación de bombeo al drenaje MID Spenker a un flujo de 573 GPM.

Aplicaciónes de derechos para el Proyecto:
• Enmienda a la Esfera de Influencia
• Actualización/Enmienda de la Revisión de Servicios
Municipales,
• Modificación del Plan General
• Zonificación previa,
• Anexión
• Plan Específico,
• Plan de Vehículos Eléctricos del Vecindario,
• mapas de subdivisión tentativas,
• Acuerdo de Desarrollo,
• Futuro: Mapas Finales, Planes de Mejora, Planos de
Nivelación, Permisos de Construcción, Permisos de Uso
Condicional, Revisión del Plano del Sitio/Diseño.

Derechos del Proyecto solicitado
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Modificación del Plan General
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

PROPUESTA DE USO DEL SUELO ACRES SIG
BGOS - Acantilado 68.53
BGOS - Canal 23.34
BGOS - Parque del Río 69.77
Doble uso de parque/estanque 41.01
HDR 10.02
LDR 467.18
MDR 78.70
Uso mixto 76.76
Parque 43.34
Reserva 579.39
Derechos de paso 63.37
Total 1,521.41
Zonificación Previa
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Plan Específico – Resumen de Uso de Suelo
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
SÍMBOLO DEL MAPA

SUPERFICIE

EN ACRES

RANGO DE

DENSIDAD

UNIDAD ESTIMADA O

RANGO DE SF
LDR – Residencial de baja
densidad
467.18 0 – 8 du/ac 1,550
MDR – Residencial de baja
densidad

78.70 8 – 16 du/ac 702
HDR – Residencial de alta
densidad

10.02 16 + du/ac 180
MU – Uso mixto (fuera del
núcleo de la comunidad) 58.39 16 + du/ac 0.25 FAR
0 – 350 du
275,000-635,000 sf
MU – Uso mixto (dentro del
núcleo de la comunidad) 5.35 16 + du/ac 0.50 FAR
0 – 100 du
110,000-220,000 sf
MU – Uso mixto(Clubhouse) 8.01 0.50 FAR 20,000 sf
Parque 43.34 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - Acantilado 68.53 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - Canal 23.34 N/A N/A
B/G/OS - Parque del Río 69.77 N/A N/A
Parque - Cuenca de Estanque 41.01 N/A N/A
Reserva 60.17 N/A N/A
ROW 63.37 N/A N/A
TOTAL 997.18 --
2,432 – 2,682 du
375,000 – 875,000 sf
¿Qué es un EIR?
• Un documento informativo que describe los efectos medioambientales anticipados de la implementación de un proyecto, según lo requerido por CEQA. • Actúa como un foro para la participación pública en el proceso de revisión medioambiental. • Un EIR incluye medidas de mitigación para reducir los posibles impactos medioambientales adversos.
• Un EIR no aboga por ni promueve el proyecto.

Proceso de Revisión Medioambiental (EIR)
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Proceso Público NOP
• Se circuló el NOP el 4 de junio de 2021
• SCH, Agencias Estatales, Agencias Locales, Ciudadanos • La reunión de determinación de alcance se llevó a cabo el 17 de junio de 2021
• Las preocupaciones planteadas en respuesta al NOP se
consideraron durante la preparación del Borrador de EIR.

D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
NOP – Áreas de Preocupación
Durante el proceso de NOP/Determinación del alcance se plantearon las siguientes preocupaciones:
• Pérdida de tierras agrícolas productivas y suelos agrícolas productivos • Desarrollo urbanístico dentro de una llanura aluvial
• Protección y preservación de los recursos culturales tribales potenciales • Aumento del tráfico en las carreteras locales y regionales, y en el acceso al sitio • Aumento del ruido operativo
• Prestación de servicios públicos, incluida la construcción de infraestructuras • Eliminación de la vegetación y el hábitat de especies del sitio • Fuente de agua para el proyecto propuesto y posibles efectos relacionados con la recarga de aguas subterráneas
• Fuentes elevadas de emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero • Expansión del SOI de la ciudad
• Impactos potenciales que inducen el crecimiento
• Posibles impactos relacionados con la salud derivados de las emisiones de contaminantes criterio y las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero
• Posible liberación de materiales peligrosos durante la construcción y la operación • Peligros potenciales asociados con los productos químicos residuales de la agricultura D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR - Temas abordados en el EIR
En el Borrador del EIR se analizaron los siguientes temas medioambientales:
• Estética y recursos visuales
• Recursos agrícolas
• Calidad del aire
• Recursos biológicos
• Recursos culturales y tribales
• Geología y suelos
• Gases de efecto invernadero/Clima/Energía
• Riesgos y materiales peligrosos
• Hidrología y calidad del agua
• Uso del suelo/Población/Vivienda
• Ruido
• Población y vivienda
• Servicios públicos y recreación
• Transporte y circulación
• Suministros públicos
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR - Alternativas
En el Borrador de EIR se analizaron las siguientes alternativas:
• Alternativa sin proyecto (sin construcción): El desarrollo del área del plan no ocurriría y el área del plan permanecería en su condición actual.
• Alternativa de densidad aumentada: El Proyecto propuesto se desarrollaría con las mismas comodidades que se describen en la Descripción del Proyecto, pero se aumentaría la densidad de los usos residenciales y la huella total del desarrollo sería igual al Plan Específico propuesto. • Alternativa de menor densidad: El proyecto propuesto se desarrollaría de tal manera que promueva lotes de mayor tamaño y reduzca la huella general de las áreas construidas. • Alternativa sin reserva: El Proyecto propuesto se desarrollaría con las mismas comodidades que se describen en la Descripción del Proyecto, pero el Área de Reserva ubicada fuera del Área Específica del Plan se eliminaría del Área del Proyecto.

D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
DEIR – Mitigación
Se crearon cuarenta y tres Medidas de Mitigación para reducir los "Impactos Potenciales" relacionados con los siguientes temas:
• Recursos agrícolas
• Calidad del aire
• Recursos biológicos
• Recursos culturales
• Geología/Suelos
• Emisiones de gases de efecto
invernadero
• Peligros/riesgos
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Emisiones de gases de efecto
invernadero
• Materiales peligrosos
• Hidrología/Calidad del Agua
• Ruido
• Instalaciones públicas
• Transporte y circulación
• Suministros públicos
DEIR – Impactos SU
Se identificaron impactos significativos e inevitables para los siguientes temas:

Impactos del Proyecto
• Recursos estéticos y visuales
• Recursos agrícolas
• Emisiones de gases de efecto
invernadero
• Ruido
• Instalaciones públicas (construcción
de nuevos parques/instalaciones
recreativas)
• Transporte y circulación (VMT)
• utilidades (construcción de nuevas
utilidades Publicas)
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
Impactos acumulativos
• Recursos estéticos y visuales
• Recursos agrícolas
• Calidad del aire
• Recursos biológicos
• Cambio climático
• Ruido
• Instalaciones públicas (construcción de nuevos
parques/instalaciones recreativas)
• Transporte y circulación (VMT)
• utilidades (construcción de nuevas utilidades Publicas) • El período de revisión pública de 45 días
finaliza el 18 de marzo de 2024
• Los comentarios deben presentarse por
escrito:
• Por correo electrónico
• Por correo postal
DEIR – Revisión pública
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
• Borrador público del EIR: el período de revisión y comentarios públicos de 45 días cierra el 18 de marzo de 2024.
• EIR final: Respuestas escritas a los comentarios y cualquier cambio realizado al Borrador del EIR. • Plan Específico Final: Revisiones del texto y de las figuras. • Audiencias de la Comisión de Planificación y del Consejo Municipal • Audiencias para certificar el EIR
• Audiencias para considerar el plan específico final y las solicitudes de subvenciones • Audiencias LAFCo
• Actualización/enmienda del MSR
• Audiencias para considerar la expansión de SOI
• Audiencias para considerar la anexión
Próximos pasos
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
El borrador del EIR está disponible para su revisión en la ciudad de Riverbank. Una copia electrónica está disponible en el sitio web de la Ciudad www.riverbank.org/609/River-Walk.

Los comentarios pueden enviarse a Miguel Galvez a:
[email protected]
O:

Miguel Galvez, Contract City Planner
Planning, City Hall South
6707 3rd Street, Suite A
Riverbank, CA 95367
Información clave
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p

Page 1 of 5 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.3
SECTION 11: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: February 27, 2024
Subject: Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Finalize a Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease Agreement for the Lease of 6436 Oakdale Road for the Future Site of Riverbank City Hall
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and finalize a Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease Agreement for 6436 Oakdale Road.

SUMMARY
Due to spatial constraints at the existing City Hall North and City Hall South buildings, staff has been evaluating vacant buildings and land within the city that would be suitable for relocating City Hall. Over the past several months, the City has been in discussions with the property owner of 6436 Oakdale Road which was identified as a suitable site to house our future city hall. Tonight’s item would authorize the City Manager to continue negotiations with the property owner and finalize a Lease if both parties reach a mutual agreement.

BACKGROUND
In June 2018, the City Council established a Strategic Plan Objective to “conduct a spatial analysis of all city facilities…” Over the past several years it has been evident that the City has outgrown its current facilities. With the population growth that is anticipated to occur in the near future, the City Council thought it would be prudent to develop long-term plans to accommodate the growth in City staff that would be needed to serve our growing community.

In preparation for the study, all departments prepared short- and long-term staffing needs.

These projections were used by the consulting team of Indigo Hammond + Playle

Page 2 of 5 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
Architects, LLP in order to determine the spatial needs for city offices. It became evident that City Hall North and City Hall South do not have sufficient space to adequately meet the needs of each of the departments, now or in the near future.

In February 2020 Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP presented a report (Attachment A) to the City Council presenting interim solutions that would help to alleviate the spatial constraints within the two existing City Hall buildings. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic reached California the following month and these interim solutions were not explored. Post-pandemic, the City has continued to grow and these interim solutions are no longer viable options therefore we continued to explore a long-term solution that would be suitable for our needs.

Due to the pandemic, many companies moved towards having their employees work remotely. Such was the case for Telecontact Resource Services, which was the telemarketing firm located at 6436 Oakdale Road. To this day, the employees of this company have continued to work remotely and therefore the majority of the site has been vacant for quite some time. The property owner has rented out smaller sections of the site to individual organizations but has never fully rented out the entire space.

With ± 42,000 square feet of space, 6436 Oakdale Road has been identified as a suitable space for relocating City Hall. The building has sufficient space to accommodate all departments currently located in City Hall North and City Hall South including Planning, Building, Finance, Development Services Administration, Recreation, Housing, and Administration. In addition, it would provide sufficient space for a new Council Chambers that would allow for an expanded capacity than that which is currently available.

TENTATIVE AGREEMENT
As previously discussed, the City has been in discussions with the property owner of 6436 Oakdale Road and has reached a tentative agreement on the following terms:

PREMISES: Option #1 (Approx. ± 27,462 sf) and Option #2 (± 42,000) below consisting of part or all of 42,000 SF free standing office building known as 6436 Oakdale Rd., Riverbank, CA
LANDLORD: Built by Burt II, Inc.

TENANT: City of Riverbank
USE: City/Government Offices and Related Uses
INITIAL LEASE TERM: Twenty (20) Years
OPTION TO EXTEND: Two (2) Ten Year Options to Extend

Page 3 of 5 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
BASE RENT SCHEDULE:
“OPTION #1” ±27,462 sf
YEARS 1-3: Commencing November 1, 2024:

Year 1: $1.15 psf NNN or $31,581.00 per month
Year 2: $1.30 psf NNN or $35,700.00 per month
Year 3: $1.45 psf NNN or $39,820.00 per month
OPTION #2 ±42,000 sf (entire building)
YEARS 1-3 Commencing November 1, 2024
Year 1: $0.85 psf NNN or $35,700.00 per month
Year 2: $1.05 psf NNN or $44,100.00 per month
Year 3: $1.10 psf NNN or $46,200.00 per month
ANNUAL
RENT

ADJUSTMENT
YEARS 4-20: The greater of 2% per annum or Local Bay Area CPI, not to exceed 5%.

American Event Center would execute a sublease agreement with the City of Riverbank, on a full-service basis (all operating expenses and utilities paid by City of Riverbank) American Event Center would be responsible for their interior maintenance and janitorial of their premise during any sublease term. Term of sublease agreement is anticipated to be 5 years.

In addition, American Event Center would prefer sole use of the small storage closet at the SEC of the building (adjacent to Event Center and continued (shared) use of the kitchen/breakroom sink/dishwasher after each event.

EFFECTIVE
LEASE DATE: Upon execution by both Landlord and Tenant, expected to be immediately after City Council Approval (November 14 th
Hearing).

OCCUPANCY or
TURNOVER DATE: June 1, 2024
Tenant shall pay no base rent from Occupancy/Turnover Date through October 31, 2024. However, Tenant shall be responsible for all operating expenses and utilities associated with the property.

RENT COMMENCMENT
DATE: November 1, 2024

Page 4 of 5 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
SECURITY DEPOSIT: None

CONDITION
OF PREMISES: As – Is
NNN LEASE: Tenant shall be responsible for all operating expenses associated with property, including but not limited to Property Taxes, Building Insurance, Common Areas, Roof, Structure, and all utilities associated with premise. Regarding Option #1 above, In the event Landlord is occupying a portion of premise, Landlord will reimburse Tenant with Landlords estimated fair share of PG&E (gas/electric) as there are not separate meters.

SIGNAGE: Tenant at Tenant’s sole expense, and subject to Landlord review and approval shall have the right to place signage on property.

ROFR – RIGHT

OF FIRST

RIGHT TO
PURCHASE: Tenant desires to purchase property within the first thirty – six (36) months of lease. There is no predetermined fixed purchase price as part of the lease. Tenant and Landlord shall negotiate a purchase when parties agree to do so. Neither party shall be bound to Buy or Sell, both parties must mutually agree to the price and further terms and conditions of the any purchase.

Tenant shall have a ROFR for the first thirty-six months of the lease. In the event Landlord chooses to sell or is presented with an unsolicited purchase offer, Landlord shall grant Tenant a onetime ROFR to purchase the property. Landlord shall provide Tenant with the Price and Terms acceptable to Landlord and Tenant shall have Thirty (30) Days to accept. If Tenant chooses not to accept those terms and does not otherwise negotiate an acceptable deal with Landlord (within 30 days) Tenant’s ROFR shall become null and void.

ITEMS SUBSEQUENT
TO TENANT PURCHASE: If City of Riverbank closes escrow on property, Built by Burt II, Inc, eContact Live, or American Event Center shall have the right to the following:

Continued, uninterrupted use and operation of its Data/Servers in Server Room for up to Ten (10) years, rent free. Built by Burt II, Inc, eContact Live, or American Event Center shall be responsible for any costs associated with maintaining/repairing/removing their Data/Server equipment.

The right to rent back the Event Center space for a period not to exceed Sixty (60) Months from City of Riverbank closing escrow.

Rent shall be the same rent schedule as agreed in sublease

Page 5 of 5 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA 02/27/2024
agreement if City of Riverbank leases the entire property. Parties could decide to extend the lease if Tenant delays expansion plans into Event Center (for council chambers or other).

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item is directly related to the City Council’s Strategic Plan Objective to “Research feasibility of a new City Hall to accommodate current and future needs.”

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Depending on the ultimate Option selected, lease payments would be as follows:
“OPTION #1” ±27,462 sf
YEARS 1-3: Commencing November 1, 2024:

Year 1: $1.15 psf NNN or $31,581.00 per month
Year 2: $1.30 psf NNN or $35,700.00 per month
Year 3: $1.45 psf NNN or $39,820.00 per month
OPTION #2 ±42,000 sf (entire building)
YEARS 1-3 Commencing November 1, 2024
Year 1: $0.85 psf NNN or $35,700.00 per month
Year 2: $1.05 psf NNN or $44,100.00 per month
Year 3: $1.10 psf NNN or $46,200.00 per month
Lease payments will be budgeted from the various funding sources impacted including, but not limited to, the General Fund, Sewer Operating Fund, Water Operating Fund, and System Development Fee Fund General Government.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 2024-XXX

2. Attachment A: Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP Interim Consultant Report Executive Summary, Current and Near Future City Staff Redeployment

3. Letter of Intent

4. DRAFT: Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease - Net

Page 1 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND FINALIZE A

STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE-TENANT LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE LEASE OF 6436 OAKDALE ROAD FOR THE FUTURE SITE OF

RIVERBANK CITY HALL

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, in June 2018 the City Council established a Strategic Plan Objective to “conduct a spatial analysis of all city facilities”; and WHEREAS, the firm of Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects, LLP performed a Spatial Needs Analysis where they evaluated the current and future staffing needs of the City and determined that additional space was required to accommodate future growth; and
WHEREAS, based on the recommendations of the Spatial Needs Analysis in August 2021 the City Council established a Strategic Plan Objective to “research feasibility of a new City Hall to accommodate current and future needs”; and WHEREAS, based on the needs of the City it was determined that the site located at 6436 Oakdale Road would be a feasible location to re-locate the staff at City Hall North and City Hall South; and
WHEREAS, over the past year the City has been negotiating with the property owner and a Letter of Intent incorporated here as Exhibit A has been signed by both parties; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Property Owner continue to work on the final details of the Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease – Net and therefore staff is requesting that the City Council provide authorization to the City Manager to finalize negotiations and prepare a final lease.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank does hereby authorize the City Manager to negotiate and finalize a Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease Agreement for the lease of 6436 Oakdale Road for the future site of Riverbank City Hall.

AYES:

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 02/27/2024
CC Resolution 2024-
NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez Richard D. O’Brien
City Clerk Mayor
Attachment(s): Exhibit A – Letter of Intent
January 13, 2020
Interim Consultant Report Executive Summary, Current and Near Future City Staff Redeployment
The City has retained Indigo Hammond + Playle Architects to examine the City’s space needs and staff deployment in most of its existing City facilities. The work is to consider current, near future and 2040 space needs and staff deployments including the possibility of a unitary City Hall and to make recommendations and conceptual plans for how to manage its current problems and future needs. It has been decided that due the City’s current needs it was appropriate to present interim findings on the Current and Near Future situation.

Consultant has met with Department Heads, toured City facilities to observe working conditions and reviewed existing Staff Organization Chart. Then working with supervisory Staff, we have updated the Staff Org. Charts to reflect projected Near Future Staff Needs and Long Term Staff Needs that will be necessary to accommodate your growing City. Existing Conditions Floor Plans for each City facility studied have also been prepared. Based on our observations of conditions in both City Hall North and City Hall South we have determined that both buildings have significant problems that at a minimum impede the efficient delivery of City services.

To quantify future spatial needs, we have developed “graphic space standards” that reflect accepted best practice for workstations, administrative office spaces and support spaces. In our effort to create the various options for temporary solutions to the City’s space problems we have not always been able to adhere to best practices but instead we have compromised to varying degrees to create affordable options that fit into existing buildings. Existing Conditions Plans, Near Future Plans and corresponding Budget Level cost estimates are attached below.

City Hall North which houses the City Council Chambers, City Managers Offices and the Parks and Recreation Headquarters is poorly laid out to serve the needs of both the staff and the public, the problems include:
• Council chambers are too small and lack provision of rudimentary security for Council meetings.
• Restrooms are inadequate, not accessible, and poorly located, forcing some staff to go outside to avoid disturbing the council chambers. • There is insufficient space in the building to house the near future needs of both the City Mangers offices and Parks and Recreation.
2 Recommendations:
• Parks and Recreation Department should be moved out of City Hall North to a rental space. To this end a Conceptual Tenant Improvement plan has been prepared that shows how Parks and Rec. could be deployed in a building currently available downtown (6800 Third St.).
• We have prepared 3 alternative Options for City Hall North (without Parks & Rec). Option 1 shows only upgraded code compliant restrooms and a few other minor changes. Option 2 shows a more complete reorganization to the building but leaves Council Chambers in their current location. . Option 3 makes the most of the building’s existing shape, placing Council Chambers at south end, sharing a public lobby with Administration in the middle of the building. • With all options there is enough room in the building to provide near future accommodations for both Administration and the smallish City Council Chambers.

City Hall South which houses the Finance Department and two of Development Servaces Department’s sub-divisions – the Planning & Building Division and the Administrative Division – is severly inadequate, problems include:
• The building is severly overcrowded.
• The building lacks necessary security.
• Overcrowding compromises confidential data security.
• The overcrowding and inappropriate separation of the public service counter and staff work spaces disturb staff and create and inefficent work environment. • There are no public restrooms.
• There is insufficient storage space and space for maps.

Recommendations:
• Finance Department should be moved out of City Hall South to a facility appropriate for its special security and data privacy needs. To this end a Conceptual Tenant Improvement plan has been prepared that shows how Finance could be deployed in a building currently available downtown (6800 Third St.).
• We have prepared two options for the Planning & Building Division and the Administrative Division to remain in City Hall South. While not optimal, the building could house the near future needs of these divisions with only minor changes.
• It is expected that these changes would significantly improve staff efficiency and moral as well as increase security.

Public Works Corperation Yard currently has enough building space to accommodate its near future needs, but the new Maintenance Building will need remodeling to allow it to accommodate field staff growth and other needs.
3 Sheriff’s Substation, the building has sufficient space to meet the Sheriff’s Near Future space needs, however there is no secure parking and rapid exiting form the parking lot is dangerous.

Recommendations:

We have assumed that, based on our discussions with the City, near future change will not be necessary for the Sheriff’s facility. The development of 2040 needs projections will require a focused in depth study of the City’s law enforcement needs and discussions with the County Sheriff that are beyond the scope of this study. If the Stanislaus County Sheriff continues to provide for Riverbank’s policing needs there are two likely options. One would be to would be to establish a substation on the west side of that railroad tracks. The other would be to have a new single facility on a larger site.

Two areas for relocation are identified in this submittal.

Sincerely,
Jonathan V. Hammond
Architect

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
6707 THIRD STEET, STE. A
RIVERBANK, CA 95367
INDIGO | HAMMOND + PLAYLE ARCHITECTS, LLP
909 5TH STREET
DAVIS, CA 95616
1/13/2020 CITY-WIDE SPACE USE & NEEDS ASSESSMENT

CITY OF RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA
N

POSSIBLE
FUTURE

SHERIFF
SITE

POSSIBLE
FUTURE

SHERIFF SITE
CORP.

YARD
(E) SHERIFF
BLDG.
(E) CITY HALL

NORTH (E) CITY HALL
SOUTH

(N) TENANT

IMPROVEMENT
(N) TENANT

IMPROVEMENT
(E) CORP. YARD
MAINT. BLDG.T.I.
(E) CORP. YARD
OFFICE BLDG.T.I.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE

DIVISION

PLANNING &

BUILDING DIVISION
MAINTENANCE - - - - 1,984 -

SERVER ROOM

MECHANICAL ROOM -

ELECTRICAL ROOM -
JANITOR ROOM 28 34 53 -
SUBTOTAL 164 177 2,137
COFFEE BAR 24 40 40 -
CONFERENCE ROOM 272 167 200 324 150

MAP ROOM - - - -
STORAGE 97 159 732 -

QUIET ROOM & LACTATION - - - -
BREAK ROOM 137 119 456 80
COPY ROOM 68 72 83 81
SUBTOTAL 493 590 1,635 311
LOBBY & RECEPTION PUBLIC LOBBY 130 189 - 115
SUBTOTAL 130 189 - 115
PUBLIC RESTROOM 67 70 691 -
STAFF RESTROOM 154 154 - 59
SUBTOTAL 221 224 691 59
1,008 1,180 4,463 485
932 1,426 340 772 665 648 606 516 601
442 348 1,245
182
556 548 - 317
2,778 2,741 6,224 1,585

PARKING AREA REQUIRED
STAFF PARKING 63
VISITOR PARKING (15%) 9
WORKERS IN FIELD PARKING 21
3,759
752
DRAFT 01/10/2020

FUTURE SPACE REQUIREMENTS TABLE - NEAR FUTURE
143
259
64 323
1,039
143
-
137
-
136
36 276
63 756
1,117
978
52 868
100

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
28 714
-
5,991
WALLS (25%) 1,198

BUILDING SUBTOTALS

STAFF SUPPORT

RESTROOMS
215
146
146

CIRCULATION

NEW WORKSPACE

SUPPORT SPACE SUBTOTAL
215
109
-
(E) CITY HALL SOUTH T.I.
28 408
135

COUNCIL

CHAMBERS
(Assumes existing
used)

PARKS &

RECREATION

DEPARTMENT
(E) CITY HALL NORTH T.I.
136 143 185

FINANCE

DEPARTMENT
-

BUILDING SUPPORT

ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT

LRA DEPARTMENT
-

SUPPORT SPACE SPACE STANDARDS
57 -
F
LOBBY
G3101
SF: 307

CONFERENCE ROOM
J3101
SF: 320

RECORDS
F109
SF: 491
STOR
J3102
SF: 40

RECORDS SUPERVISOR
F102
SF: 143
STOR
J3103
SF: 55
CHIEF
F101
SF: 285

UNISEX RESTROOM
N3101
SF: 54
STOR
J3104
SF: 15

BREAK ROOM
J3101
SF: 139

REPORT WRITING & TRAFFIC
F105
SF: 397

OFFICE AREA
F106
SF: 364

INTERVIEW ROOM
F107
SF: 84
STOR
J3105
SF: 150
CIRC
K3103
SF: 1,307

STOR / SALLY PORT
J3106
SF: 655
STOR
J3108
SF: 88
STOR
J3109
SF: 74

ELEC ROOM
L3101
SF: 208

RESTROOM
N6101
SF: 38

SERVER ROOM
L3102
SF: 35
OFFICE
F108
SF: 221

JAN/ELEC
L3103
SF: 66

HOLDING CELL
F111
SF: 102

HOLDING CELL
F110
SF: 59

FILE STOR
J3107
SF: 354
ARMORY
J3111
SF: 49
CIRC
K3102
SF: 83
CIRC
K3101
SF: 46

EVIDENCE
F103
SF: 150

MEN RESTROOM
N3102
SF: 435

WOMEN RESTROOM
N3103
SF: 288

VOLUNTEERS
F109
SF: 125

REPORTS
F104
SF: 141

BRIEFFING ROOM
J3110
SF: 553
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 EXISTING DEPLOYMENT SHERIFF BUILDING-6727 3RD ST- FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT 9,190 SF

NO IMMMEDIATE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY
RECORDS STORAGE A BIT SMALL.

RE
F
(N) EMERGENCY

REFUGE / EXIT

DOOR FOR COUNCIL

MEMBERS
LOBBY
(E) ADMIN PUBLIC

ENTRY (E) COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PUBLIC ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY (E) STAFF ENTRY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
H101
SF: 978
SEAN
A101
SF: 174

SEAN STOR
J1101
SF: 6
NORMA
A104
SF: 90
COPY
J1106
SF: 17

VACANT HR
A105
SF: 49

MELANIE
A106
SF: 48

RECEPTION
G1102
SF: 65
LOBBY
G1103
SF: 177

COFF & STOR
J1105
SF: 34
STOR
J1104
SF: 19
STOR
J1103
SF: 33
STOR
J1102
SF: 13
CIRC
K1101
SF: 207

MARISELA
B101
SF: 137

VACANT HR MGR
A103
SF: 157

ANNABELLE
A102
SF: 201
UNISEX
N1101
SF: 51
UNISEX
N1102
SF: 44
LOBBY
G1101
SF: 124
RECEP
G1104
SF: 72

VACANT NEAR HOUSING
D108
SF: 51

HOUSING
D106
SF: 143
STOR
J1107
SF: 92
JULIA
D102
SF: 138

OPEN STOR
J1108
SF: 97

OPEN CONF
J1109
SF: 121

JUANITA
D103
SF: 86

VACANT PARKS & REC
D107
SF: 86
SUE
D101
SF: 153
DAVID
D105
SF: 86

STOR & REC
J1112
SF: 109
RON
D104
SF: 123
STOR
J1111
SF: 93

BREAK ROOM
J1110
SF: 159

ELEC ROOM
L1101
SF: 57
CIRC
K1103
SF: 293
CIRC
K1102
SF: 114

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.

LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY DEPT.

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION
0 4' 8' 16' N
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
4 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT COUNCIL CHAMBERS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT CITY HALL NORTH - EXISTING DEPLOYMENT -6707 3RD ST- FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT 5,300 SF

MAJOR PROBLEMS
- DEPARTMENTS ARE SEPARATED FROM THE
RESTROOMS. STAFF HAS TO GO OUTSIDE THE BLDG.
- RESTROOMS ARE NOT ACCESSIBLE AND
INSUFFICIENT.
- BREAK ROOM TOO SMALL.
- NO CONFERENCE ROOM.
- COUNCIL CHAMBERS: TOO SMALL, AND NOT SECURE.

PARKS & REC LINES ARE A PROBLEM AT
PUBLIC COUNTER, NO WAITING SPACE.

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOT

SECURE, NO BALLISTIC SECURITY,
NO ACOUSTICAL PRIVACY IN ANY NO ESCAPE ROUTE, ETC.

CITY HALL NORTH OFFICES

MOST OF THE OFFICES

HAVE MINIMAL TO NO
NATURAL LIGHT. SOME
HAVE NO WINDOWS AT ALL.

CITY HALL SOUTH IS THE ONLY BUILDING THAT
HAS A BIG CONFERENCE ROOM. STAFF OF CITY

HALL NORTH HAVE TO CROSS THE STREET TO
USE IT. ALSO, IT IS THE ONLY BIG WORKSPACE

AVAILABLE, SO TYPICALLY IT IS ALREADY
OCCUPIED WHEN OTHERS WISH TO USE IT.

PUBLIC COUNTERS GENERALLY TOO HIGH

FOR ACCESSIBILITY OR HAVE TOO LITTLE
LOWER COUNTER SPACE.

CITY STAFFING NUMBERS ARE UNDER
WHERE THEY NEED TO BE CURRENTLY.

VACANT DESKS ARE AN ISSUE.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS TOO SMALL - 30-40

PERSON CAPACITY WITH OVERFLOW INTO
OPEN OFFICE ADJACENT. DISRUPTIVE FOR
BOTH STAFF AND PUBLIC.

NEED JAN. CLOSET.

STAFF HAVE TO GO

OUTSIDE THE BUILDING

TO USE THE
RESTROOMS.

SMALL CONF RM NEEDED

FOR CITY MGR OFFICES

SEATING FOR ELDERLY AND
DISABLED NEEDED IN LOBBYS.

RE
F

REMOVE (E)
WALL

REMOVE (E)

WALL (E) ADMIN PUBLIC

ENTRY (E) COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PUBLIC ENTRY (E) STAFF ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SF: 932
HR MGR
SF: 162
ASST. CITY MANAGER
SF: 138

CITY MANAGER
SF: 182
ADM. SER. DIRECTOR
SF: 59
SR. MGMT. ANALYST / CITY CLERK
SF: 68
ADM. SER. DIRECTOR
SF: 59

LRA DIRECTOR
SF: 138

HR SEP / ADMIN ANALYST II
SF: 59
SR. HR ANALYST
SF: 125

ADMIN ANALYST
SF: 75
LOBBY
SF: 197

CONF ROOM
SF: 203
STOR
SF: 109

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SF: 148 DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SF: 52
MEDIA TECH. OFFICER
SF: 54
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 52
RECORDS COORD.

SF: 51
ADMIN. CLERK
SF: 56 ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 76
PERSONNEL TECH.

SF: 52

BREAK ROOM
SF: 276

COPY RM
SF: 93

COFFEE BAR
SF: 30

RESTROOM
SF: 88

RESTROOM
SF: 142

ELEC ROOM
SF: 57

JANITOR
SF: 92

COPY RM
SF: 23

CIRCULATION

CIRCULATION

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.

LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY DEPT.

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 1 (THE CHEAPEST) LEGEND
5,300 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- PROVIDE INTERIOR CIRCULATION TO CONNECT

ALL THE OFFICES AND RESTROOMS WITHOUT
GOING OUT THE BLDG.
- PROVIDE CONFERENCE ROOM FOR COUNCIL &
STAFF MEMBERS.
- ENLARGE PUBLIC RESTROOMS.
- ENLARGE BREAK ROOM.
- ENLARGE LOBBY.
(REMODEL AREA: 800 SQ.FT.)

OPEN OFFICE

EXPANDED BREAK
ROOM
(N) RELOCATED

RESTROOMS
(N) CONFERENCE

ROOM FOR

COUNCIL & STAFF
(N) INTERIOR

CIRCULATION
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 800 SF $466 $373,000
Site Cost 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 est. allowance
Building Cost 800 SF $300 $240,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 230 SF $250 $57,500 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 800 SF $57 $45,500
General Conditions 5.5 % $270,000 $14,850 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $270,000 $27,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $270,000 $3,618 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $127,200
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 800 SF $40 $32,000 est. allow. w/ Council chairs Phones & IT equipment 800 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $373,000 $1,865 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 24.0 % $373,000 $89,520 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 5,300 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $373,000 $3,730 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $373,000 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $50,400
Escalation assumes 1 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 3.5 % $373,000 $13,055 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $373,000 $37,300 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $550,600
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $550,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 1 (CHEAPEST)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

RE
F
F
(N) EMERGENCY

REFUGE / EXIT

DOOR FOR COUNCIL

MEMBERS
(E) ADMIN PUBLIC

ENTRY (E) COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PUBLIC ENTRY (E) STAFF ENTRY
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW (E) STAFF ENTRY
(N) STAFF ENTRY
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SF: 932
SR. MGMT. ANALYST / CITY CLERK
SF: 134
HR MGR
SF: 130

HR SEP / ADMIN ANALYST II
SF: 150
ASST. CITY MANAGER
SF: 138

LRA DIRECTOR
SF: 123

ADMIN ANALYST
SF: 56
LOBBY
SF: 146
STOR
SF: 109

CITY MANAGER
SF: 176
ADM. SER. DIRECTOR
SF: 128
MEDIA TECH. OFFICER
SF: 55
RECORDS COORD.

SF: 55
ADMIN. CLERK
SF: 56
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 56
PERSONNEL TECH.

SF: 52

BREAK ROOM
SF: 276

COPY RM
SF: 63
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 54

ELEC ROOM
SF: 57
SR. HR ANALYST
SF: 99

PUBLIC INFORMATION
SF: 97

DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SF: 99

CONF ROOM
SF: 272

WOMEN RESTROOM
SF: 130

UNISEX RESTROOM
SF: 65

MEN RESTROOM
SF: 85

CIRCULATION

CIRCULATION
STOR
SF: 34

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.

LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY DEPT.

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE- OPTION 2 (MIDDLE)
LEGEND
5,300 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- PROVIDE INTERIOR CIRCULATION TO CONNECT ALL THE
OFFICES AND RESTROOMS WITHOUT GOING OUT THE BLDG.
- PROVIDE BIG CONFERENCE ROOM WITH KITCHEN FOR
COUNCIL & STAFF MEMBERS.
- ENLARGE PUBLIC RESTROOMS & PROVIDE UNISEX
RESTROOM FOR STAFF USE.
- ENLARGE BREAK ROOM.
- ENLARGE LOBBY.
- PROVIDE PRIVATE OFFICES.
- PROVIDE WINDOWS FOR EVERY OFFICE.
(REMODEL AREA: 2,400 SQ.FT.)

EXPANDED BREAK
ROOM
(N) RELOCATED

AND ENLARGED

RESTROOMS
(N) STAFF

RESTROOMS
(N) BIG CONFERENCE

ROOM FOR COUNCIL &
STAFF
(N) PRIVATE

OFFICES
(N) INTERIOR

CIRCULATION
(N) OPEN OFFICE
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 2,400 SF $336 $806,100
Site Cost 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 est. allowance
Building Cost 2,400 SF $250 $600,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 280 SF $250 $70,000 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 2,400 SF $44 $106,100
General Conditions 5.5 % $630,000 $34,650 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $630,000 $63,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $630,000 $8,442 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $217,200
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 2,400 SF $15 $36,000 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 2,400 SF $10 $24,000 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $806,100 $4,031 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 18.0 % $806,100 $145,098 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 5,300 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $806,100 $8,061 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $806,100 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $123,000
Escalation assumes 1.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 5.3 % $806,100 $42,320 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $806,100 $80,610 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $1,146,300
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $1,150,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 2 (MIDDLE)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

F
F
(E) ADMIN PUBLIC
ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW (N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW (N) WINDOW (N) WINDOW
SR. MGMT. ANALYST / CITY CLERK
SF: 115
HR MGR
SF: 115

HR SEP / ADMIN ANALYST II
SF: 117
SR. HR ANALYST
SF: 77
ASST. CITY MANAGER
SF: 120

LRA DIRECTOR
SF: 121

ADMIN ANALYST
SF: 100
LOBBY
SF: 219

CONF ROOM
SF: 226
STOR
SF: 78

CITY MANAGER
SF: 175 COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SF: 1,510
ADM. SER. DIRECTOR
SF: 103

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER
SF: 85

DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SF: 47
MEDIA TECH. OFFICER
SF: 49
RECORDS COORD.

SF: 45
ADMIN. CLERK
SF: 91
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 46
PERSONNEL TECH.

SF: 52

WOMEN RESTROOM
SF: 132

UNISEX RESTROOM
SF: 56

BREAK ROOM
SF: 182

COPY RM
SF: 41

MEN RESTROOM
SF: 82
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF: 52

ELEC ROOM
L1101
SF: 57

CIRCULATION
STOR
SF: 60

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
ADMINISTRATION DEPT.

LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY DEPT.

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
3 CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 3 (THE MOST EXPENSIVE) LEGEND
5,300 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- RELOCATE & ENLARGE COUNCIL MEMBERS TO
ONE SIDE OF THE BLDG WITH STORAGE ROOM.
- PROVIDE BIG CONFERENCE ROOM WITH
KITCHEN FOR COUNCIL & STAFF MEMBERS.
- ENLARGE PUBLIC RESTROOMS & PROVIDE
UNISEX RESTROOM FOR STAFF USE.
- ENLARGE BREAK ROOM.
- ENLARGE LOBBY.
- PROVIDE PRIVATE OFFICES.
- PROVIDE WINDOWS FOR EVERY OFFICE.
(REMODEL AREA: 5,300 SQ.FT.) (N) ENLARGED
(N) PRIVATE LOBBY

OFFICES (N) RELOCATED EXPANDED

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(N) BIG CONFERENCE

ROOM FOR COUNCIL &
STAFF
(N) STAFF

RESTROOM (N) ENLARGED

BREAK ROOM
(N) OPEN
OFFICE
(N) RELOCATED

AND ENLARGED

RESTROOMS
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 5,300 SF $262 $1,386,600
Site Cost 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 est. allowance
Building Cost 5,300 SF $200 $1,060,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 452 SF $250 $113,000 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 5,300 SF $35 $183,600
General Conditions 5.5 % $1,090,000 $59,950 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $1,090,000 $109,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $1,090,000 $14,606 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $346,200
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 5,300 SF $20 $106,000 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 5,300 SF $10 $53,000 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $1,386,600 $6,933 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 12.0 % $1,386,600 $166,392 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 5,300 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $1,386,600 $13,866 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $1,386,600 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $211,500
Escalation assumes 1.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 5.3 % $1,386,600 $72,797 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $1,386,600 $138,660 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $1,944,300
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $1,940,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CITY HALL NORTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 3 (MOST EXPENSIVE)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

F F

JULLISA
C1104
SF: 71

BREAK RM
J2101

CONF RM
J2104
JANET
C2102
SF: 93
MARK
C2105
SF: 36

KATHLEEN
C1101
SF: 104
VACANT
J2103
SF: 48

GABRIEL
C1105
SF: 49

MIGUEL ALANIZ
C2103

MICHELE
C2104
SF: 93
DONNA
C2101
SF: 139
JUDY
B107
SF: 34

GERRICK
B105
SF: 54
LINDA
B104
SF: 54

JESSICA
B106
SF: 54

CHRISTINA
B103
SF: 43
PETER
C1103
SF: 93
LAURA
C1102
SF: 68

MAP ROOM
J2102
SF: 53
MEN
N2102
SF: 122
WOMEN
N2101
SF: 131
ANNA
B102
SF: 135

ELEC/ SERVER/ STOR
L2101
SF: 185
STOR
J210
SF: 66
STOR
J2107
SF: 69
STOR
J211
SF: 65
LOBBY
G2101
SF: 93

RECEPTION
G1101
SF: 141

COPY AREA
J2105
SF: 67
JAN
L2102
SF: 28

COPY AREA
J2106
SF: 45
CIRC
K2101
SF: 639
STOR
J212
SF: 11

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION
FINANCE DEPT.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /
PLANNING & BLDG. DIVISION
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL SOUTH - EXISTING DEPLOYMENT - 6617 3RD ST- FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT 3,770 SF

MAJOR PROBLEMS
- NO PUBLIC RESTROOMS.
- OPEN OFFICES WITHOUT PRIVACY, TOO CLOSE
TO PUBLIC LOBBY.
- NEED MORE ROOM FOR DOCUMENTATION /
MAPS.
- DEPARTMENTS ARE FRAGMENTED.

MOST STAFF WORK IN ISOLATION. SILO'D
WORK. NOT COHESIVE.

GOING BACK AND FORTH

BETWEEN CITY HALL

NORTH AND SOUTH IS A

HASSLE FOR CUSTOMER
SERVICE.

INTERNAL CUSTOMER VS. PUBLIC CUSTOMER….

SEPARATION OF SERVICES IS A PROBLEM.

STAFF CONGREGATE

AROUND PAYROLL

WORKSTATION CREATING
DATA PRIVACY ISSUES.

SEPARATION NEEDED.

CODE ENFORCEMENT
STAFF SHOULD BE COLOCATED - ARE
CURRENTLY SEPARATED.

RESTROOMS ARE IMPORTANT. THERE ARE NO PUBLIC

RESTROOMS IN CITY HALL SOUTH, COSTUMERS HAVE TO
LEAVE TO USE CITY HALL NORTH RESTROOMS.

ELEC/ SERVER ROOM IS

ALSO AN IT OFFICE AND
FINANCE STORAGE ROOM.

NO VENTILATION.

JANITOR'S CLOSET IS TOO SMALL.

NEED MORE
STORAGE.

NEED LARGE ROOM FOR

DOCUMENTATION AND
REFERENCE MATERIALS.

CURRENTLY THIS ROOM
IS LOCATED INCONVENIENTLY AT THE

CORP YARD WITH A

SATELLITE CUBICLE

SPACE HERE

SEATING FOR ELDERLY AND
DISABLED NEEDED IN LOBBYS.

PLAN-SIZE COUNTERS

NEEDED FOR PLANNING
AND BUILDING INSPECTION.

F F
(E) STAFF ENTRY
(E) PUBLIC ENTRY
ADMIN. ASSISTANT
SF: 33

ADM INTERN
SF: 33
DEV. SERVICES ADMIN. MGR
SF: 139
SR COMMUNITY DEVELOP. SPECIALIST
SF: 103
CONSTR/INSPEC. I
SF: 35
PROJECT COORD.

SF: 98

RECYCLING
SF: 132
GIS COORD.

SF: 81
CONSTR/ INSPEC.

SF: 36
LOBBY
SF: 212

CONF ROOM
SF: 408
STOR
SF: 79

COPY RM
SF: 52

RESTROOM
SF: 123

RESTROOM
SF: 136
STOR
SF: 22
PLANNING & BLDG. MGR
SF: 122

BLDG INSPECTOR
SF: 59

BLDG INSPEC
SF: 58

NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF: 55

NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF: 57

BLDG TECH
SF: 55

ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SF: 94
ADMIN. ANALYST/MUNI
SF: 59

ELEC/ SERVER/ STOR
L2101
SF: 185
JAN
L2102
SF: 28

BREAK ROOM
SF: 136

CIRCULATION

MAP ROOM
SF: 138
STOR
SF: 30
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /
PLANNING & BLDG. DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 CITY HALL SOUTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 1 (THE CHEAPEST) LEGEND
3,770 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- ENLARGE LOBBY
- PROVIDE OPEN OFFICE WITH LOBBY PRIVACY.
- PROVIDE A NEW PRIVATE OFFICE.
- RELOCATE AND ENLARGE MAP ROOM.
(REMODEL AREA: 850 SQ.FT.)
(N) ENLARGED

MAP ROOM
(N) PRIVATE
OFFICE
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 850 SF $392 $333,000
Site Cost 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 est. allowance
Building Cost 850 SF $300 $255,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 0 SF $250 $0 assumes none included General Contractor Markup 850 SF $56 $48,000
General Conditions 5.5 % $285,000 $15,675 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $285,000 $28,500 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $285,000 $3,819 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $102,000
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 850 SF $10 $8,500 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 850 SF $10 $8,500 est. allowance
Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $333,000 $1,665 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 24.0 % $333,000 $79,920 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 3,770 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $333,000 $3,330 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $333,000 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $45,000
Escalation assumes 1 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 3.5 % $333,000 $11,655 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $333,000 $33,300 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $480,000
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $480,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CITY HALL SOUTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 1 (CHEAPEST)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

F
(E) STAFF ENTRY
(N) WINDOW
(N) WINDOW
(E) PUBLIC ENTRY
ADMIN. ASSISTANT
SF: 40

ADM INTERN
SF: 40
DEV. SERVICES ADMIN. MGR
SF: 142
SR COMMUNITY DEVELOP. SPECIALIST
SF: 104

CONSTR/ INSPEC
SF: 92

PROJECT COORDINATOR
SF: 130

RECYCLING
SF: 140
GIS COORD.

SF: 39
CONSTR/ INSPEC.

SF: 91
ADMIN. ANALYST/MUNI
SF: 39
LOBBY
SF: 143

CONF ROOM
SF: 224

COFFEE BAR
SF: 51
STOR
SF: 79

UNISEX TOILET
SF: 63

BREAK RM
J2101

COPY RM
SF: 77

RESTROOM
SF: 123

RESTROOM
SF: 136

MAP ROOM
SF: 138
PLANNING & BLDG. MGR
SF: 136

BLDG INSPECTOR
SF: 92

BLDG INSPEC
SF: 52

NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF: 60 NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF: 57

BLDG TECH
SF: 72

ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SF: 93

ELEC/ SERVER
SF: 88
JAN
SF: 28

CIRCULATION
STOR
SF: 74
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /

ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPT. /
PLANNING & BLDG. DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 CITY HALL SOUTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 2 (THE MOST EXPENSIVE) LEGEND
3,770 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- RELOCATE AND ENLARGE BREAK ROOM AND
CONFERENCE ROOM. FLEXIBLE MULTI-PUROSE
ROOM WITH PUBLIC ACCESS.
- PROVIDE OPEN OFFICE WITH LOBBY PRIVACY.
- PROVIDE PUBLIC RESTROOM.
- PROVIDE 2 NEW PRIVATE OFFICES.
- RELOCATE AND ENLARGE MAP ROOM.
- SMALLER SERVER ROOM.
- ENLARGE STORAGE ROOM.
- ENLARGE COPY ROOM.
(REMODEL AREA: 1,575 SQ.FT. )
(N) ENLARGED

MAP ROOM
(N) OFFICE

SMALLER

SERVER ROOM
(N) OFFICE
(N) STORAGE
ROOM
(N) PUBLIC

RESTROOM
(N) MULTI-PURPOSE

ROOM WITH PUBLIC
ACCESS
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 1,575 SF $324 $510,900
Site Cost 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 est. allowance
Building Cost 1,575 SF $250 $393,750 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 63 SF $250 $15,750 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 1,575 SF $45 $71,400
General Conditions 5.5 % $423,750 $23,306 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $423,750 $42,375 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $423,750 $5,678 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $146,900
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 1,575 SF $20 $31,500 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 1,575 SF $10 $15,750 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $510,900 $2,555 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 18.0 % $510,900 $91,962 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 3,770 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $510,900 $5,109 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $510,900 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $78,000
Escalation assumes 1.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 5.3 % $510,900 $26,822 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $510,900 $51,090 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $735,800
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $740,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CITY HALL SOUTH - NEAR FUTURE - OPTION 2 (MOST EXPENSIVE)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

F
(E) PUBLIC
ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY

SUPERINTENDENT
SF: 109

ADM CLERK I
SF: 69
LOBBY
SF: 189

PARKS & REC DIRECTOR
SF: 173

REC SUPERVISOR
SF: 85 PARKS & FACIL. MAINT. SUPERVISOR
SF: 85

ADM CLERK
SF: 63

RECREATION COORD
SF: 81

BREAK ROOM
SF: 119

COFFEE BAR
SF: 27
STOR
SF: 159
SERVER, MECH. & ELECTR. ROOM
SF: 143

JANITOR
SF: 34

UNISEX TOILET
SF: 70

RESTROOMS
SF: 54

COPY RM
SF: 72

CONF ROOM
SF: 200

RESTROOMS
SF: 100

CIRCULATION
F

TRANSACTION
WINDOW
(E) PUBLIC
ENTRY
(E) STAFF ENTRY

ACOUNTING MGR
SF: 116

ACCOUNT CLERK II
SF: 63

ADMIN INTERN
SF: 60

ACCOUNT CLERK I
SF: 60

ACCOUNT CLERK I
SF: 58

ACCOUNTING TCH
SF: 96
HOUSING & ECO. DEV. SPEC.

SF: 85

ACCOUNTANT
SF: 80

ACCOUNT CLERK
SF: 56

HOUSING SPEC
SF: 73
LOBBY
SF: 130

CONF ROOM
SF: 167

COFFEE BAR
SF: 24
STOR
SF: 97
SERVER, MECH. & ELECTR. ROOM
SF: 136

JANITOR
SF: 28

UNISEX TOILET
SF: 67

COPY RM
SF: 68

BREAK ROOM
SF: 137

RESTROOMS
SF: 96

CIRCULATION

RESTROOMS
SF: 56
FINANCE DEPT.

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
PARKS & RECREATION DEPT.

N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 OPTION 1: PARKS & REC NEAR FUTURE T.I @ 6800 3RD ST
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 OPTION 2: FINANCE NEAR FUTURE T.I @ 6800 3RD ST
LEGEND
2,500 SF 2,500 SF

PARKS & REC - MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- PROVIDE BIG LOBBY AND SMALL OPEN OFFICE.
- PROVIDE PUBLIC UNISEX RESTROOM & STAFF
RESTROOMS.
- PROVIDE PRIVATE OFFICES.
- INSTALL BIG STORAGE ROOM.
- BUILD CONFERENCE ROOM, BREAK ROOM & COPY
ROOM.
(REMODEL AREA: 2,500 SQ.FT.)

FINANCE - MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- PROVIDE SECURE LOBBY W/ TRANSACTION
WINDOW AND ENLARGE OPEN OFFICE.
- PROVIDE PUBLIC UNISEX RESTROOM & STAFF
RESTROOMS.
- PROVIDE PRIVATE OFFICES.
- BUILD ENLARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, BREAK
ROOM & COPY ROOM.
(REMODEL AREA: 2,500 SQ.FT.)
(N) BIG

CONFERENCE
ROOM
(N) BIG

CONFERENCE
ROOM
(N) BIG

STORAGE
ROOM
(N) STAFF

RESTROOMS
(N) PUBLIC

RESTROOMS
(N) PUBLIC

RESTROOMS
(N) OPEN
OFFICE
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 2,500 SF $331 $828,600
Site Cost 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 assumes minor
Building Cost 2,500 SF $250 $625,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 370 SF $250 $92,500 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 2,500 SF $42 $106,100
General Conditions 5.5 % $630,000 $34,650 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $630,000 $63,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $630,000 $8,442 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $211,600
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 2,500 SF $10 $25,000 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 2,500 SF $10 $25,000 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $828,600 $4,143 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 18.0 % $828,600 $149,148 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $828,600 $8,286 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $828,600 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $126,400
Escalation assumes 1.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 5.3 % $828,600 $43,502 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $828,600 $82,860 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $1,166,600
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $1,170,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include construction management cost. 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead.

RIVERBANK OFFSITE TENANT IMPROVEMENT - NEAR FUTURE - PARKS & REC OR FINANCE

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

F
DAREN
O2102
SF: 150

MICHAEL
O2101
SF: 155

FAX/COPY
J4103
SF: 82
UNISEX
N4101
SF: 44

BREAK ROOM
J4102
SF: 81
VACANT
O2105
SF: 35
VACANT
O2106
SF: 40
ADM. ASSISTANT
O2104
SF: 76

CONFERENCE ROOM
J4101
SF: 150
ERIC
O2103
SF: 155

LOBBY/RECEPTION
G4101
SF: 78
CIRC
K4101
SF: 220
STOR
J4104
SF: 10
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CORP. YARD OFFICE BUILDING - EXISTING DEPLOYMENT - FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT 1,415 SF

MAJOR PROBLEMS
- UNISEX RESTROOM IS NOT ACCESSIBLE.
- LOOBY NEEDS SEATING SPACE.

CONFERENCE ROOM IS TOO SMALL.

UNISEX TOILET IS INSUFFICIENT AND

LOCATED TOO CLOSE TO RECEPTION
DESK.

SEATING FOR ELDERLY AND
DISABLED NEEDED IN LOBBYS.

F

CONF ROOM
SF: 150
250

BREAK ROOM
SF: 80
40 COPY RM
SF: 81
155

PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR
SF: 153
196

PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR
SF: 150
100

ADMIN ASSISTANT
SF: 56
64 WATER SUPERVISOR
SF: 110
100

WWTP SUPERVISOR
SF: 132
100
LOBBY
SF: 115
200

UNISEX RESTROOM
SF: 59
360

CIRCULATION
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 CORP. YARD OFFICE BLDG. - NEAR FUTURE
1,415 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND
- ENLARGE (E) RESTROOM TO BE ACCESSIBLE.
- EXPAND & CLOSE LOBBY TO PROVIDE SEATING
SPACE.

PROVIDE NEW OFFICE.
(REMODEL AREA: 350 SQ.FT.)

ENLARGED AND

ACCESSIBLE

RESTROOM
(N) PRIVATE

OFFICE ENLARGED LOBBY WITH

SEATING SPACE
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 350 SF $460 $160,900
Site Cost 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 assumes none included
Building Cost 350 SF $300 $105,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 59 SF $250 $14,750 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 350 SF $60 $21,100
General Conditions 5.5 % $125,000 $6,875 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $125,000 $12,500 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $125,000 $1,675 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $44,600
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 350 SF $10 $3,500 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 350 SF $0 $0 est. allowance
Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $160,900 $805 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 24.0 % $160,900 $38,616 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 1,415 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $160,900 $1,609 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $160,900 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $21,800
Escalation assumes 1 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 3.5 % $160,900 $5,632 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $160,900 $16,090 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $227,300
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $230,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CORP YARD OFFICE BUILDING - NEAR FUTURE

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

LOCKER
ROOM
SHOWER
SHOWER
LOCKER
ROOM

MAINTENANCE BAT
SF: 2,668
OFFICE
SF: 128
STREET DEPT. STOR
SF: 129 ELEC ROOM
SF: 100

WOMEN RESTROOM
SF: 247

MEN RESTROOM
SF: 310

CONFERENCE ROOM / BREAK ROOM
SF: 628
CIRC
SF: 69
CIRC
SF: 91
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION
N

SIGNIFICANT LARGE

VEHICLE ACCESS

ISSUES TO REPAIR BAYS

CONVERT TOILET ROOMS TO

UNISEX SINGLE OCCUPANT

TOILETS AND SHOWERS FOR

FLEXIBILITY AND CODE
COMPLIANCE?

ELEVATOR NEEDED

TO TAKE FULL

ADVANTAGE OF

MEZZANINE
SPACE?

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
4,800 SF
CORP. YARD MAINTENANCE BUILDING - EXISTING DEPLOYMENT - 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT

MAJOR PROBLEMS
- SECOND STORY IS NOT ACCESSIBLE.
- LOCKER / RESTROOM ARE NOT
ACCESSIBLE.

BREAK ROOM IS TOO SMALL FOR A

LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, WHICH IS
OFTEN HOW IT FUNCTIONS; ALTERNATE

USE CONFLICTS WITH NEED FOR

ACCESSIBLE BREAK AREA
F

MEZZANINE
O1103
SF: 947

OFFICE AREA
O1104
SF: 140

BREAK ROOM
J5101
SF: 730
CIRC
K5103
SF: 168

MAP STOR
J5103
SF: 325
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION
N

ELEVATOR

NEEDED TO TAKE

FULL ADVANTAGE

OF MEZZANINE
SPACE?

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
CORP 2,700 SF . YARD - EXISTING DEPLOYMENT - 2 ND FLOOR PLAN 2019 DRAFT MAPS ROOM SHOULD BE AT CITY HALL.

DEMOLISH (E) WALL
(N) ACCESSIBLE
EGRESS
(N) STORAGE
ROOMS
(N) ACCESSIBLE

RESTROOMS
(N) ACCESSIBLE

RESTROOMS
LOCKER
ROOM
(N) EGRESS STAIR

MAINTENANCE BAT
SF: 2,668
UP
LOCKER
ROOM

ELEC ROOM
SF: 101

WOMEN'S RESTROOM
SF: 326

BREAK RM
SF: 456

STORAGE
SF: 129

STORAGE
SF: 129

ELEVATOR
SF: 64

CIRCULATION

JANITOR
SF: 16

MEN'S RESTROOM
SF: 278
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1 CORP. YARD MAINT. BLDG. - 1ST FLOOR - NEAR FUTURE
LEGEND
4,800 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- INSTALL ELEVATOR TO BE ACCESSIBLE SECOND STORY.
- PROVIDE NEW EGRESS WITH EXTERIOR STAIR.
- REMODEL (E) LOCKER & RESTROOMS TO BE ACCESSIBLE.
- PROVIDE STORAGE ROOM.
(2 STORY REMODEL AREA: 1,000 SQ.FT.)
(N) CONFERENCE
ROOM
(N) EGRESS
(N) STAFF
(N) OPEN OFFICE RESTROOM
(N) ACCESSIBLE
EGRESS

OPEN TO

FIRST FLOOR

ELEVATOR
SF: 64
200

CITY MECHANIC
SF: 129
100
WWTP MAINT. TECH
SF: 75
64 WWTP OPERATOR
SF: 79
64 WWTP OPERATOR INTR
SF: 79
64 WWTP OPERATOR
SF: 79
64 SERVICE TECH
SF: 75
64 CONF ROOM
SF: 324
700
STOR
SF: 332
250

COPY RM
SF: 83
155

JANITOR
SF: 37
40 COFFEE BAR
SF: 39
40 CIRCULATION

UNISEX RESTROOM
SF: 87
100
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT. /

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

LOBBY/RECEPTION

STAFF SUPPORT

BUILDING SUPPORT

CIRCULATION

NEW WALL

EXISTING WALL

NEW DOOR

EXISTING DOOR
N
0 4' 8' 16'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
2 CORP. YARD MAINT. BLDG. 2ND FLOOR - NEAR FUTURE
LEGEND
2,700 SF

MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS
- INSTALL ELEVATOR TO BE ACCESSIBLE SECOND STORY.
- PROVIDE NEW EGRESS WITH EXTERIOR STAIR.
- PROVIDE BIG STORAGE ROOM.
- BUILD BIG CONFERENCE ROOM.
- PROVIDE UNISEX RESTROOM AT SECOND LEVEL.
- PROVIDE AN OPEN OFFCIE WITH COOFEE BAR & COPY ROOM.
(2 STORY REMODEL AREA: 1,000 SQ.FT.)
Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 1,000 SF $465 $464,600
Site Cost 1 LS $0 $0 assumes none included
Building Cost 1,000 SF $250 $250,000 est. allowance
Elevator Cost 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 est. allowance
Egress Stair Cost 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 190 SF $250 $47,500 est. allowance General Contractor Markup 1,000 SF $42 $42,100
General Conditions 5.5 % $250,000 $13,750 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $250,000 $25,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $250,000 $3,350 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $120,600
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 1,000 SF $20 $20,000 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 1,000 SF $10 $10,000 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $464,600 $2,323 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included
Engineering & design 18.0 % $464,600 $83,628 on direct bldg. + site Topographical & Geotechnical Engineering 1 EA $0 $0 assumes none included Building Deferred Maintenance 7,500 SF $0 $0 assumes none included Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $464,600 $4,646 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $0 $0 assumes none included Construction management 0.0 % $464,600 $0 assumes none included ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $70,900
Escalation assumes 1.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 5.3 % $464,600 $24,392 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $464,600 $46,460 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $656,100
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $660,000 est. allowance 1 Does not include land acquisition. 3 Does not include deferred maintenance cost (e.g., roof repair cost TBD). 2 Does not include City staff time and overhead. 4 Does not include construction management cost. 5 Does not include temporary relocation costs.

RIVERBANK CORP YARD MAINTENANCE BUILDING - NEAR FUTURE

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

ADMINISTRATIVE

DIVISION

PLANNING &

BUILDING DIVISION
(E) CORP. YARD
MAINT. BLDG (N) OFFICE BLDG.

MAINTENANCE - - - - - - - - - 3,000 -
SERVER ROOM - 400 200
MECHANICAL ROOM 400 200
ELECTRICAL ROOM 400 200
JANITOR ROOM 100 60 50
SUBTOTAL - - - - - - - - 1,300 3,160 650
COFFEE BAR 40 40 40 30 30 30 30 - 40 40
MAP ROOM 220 220 - -
STORAGE (8% OFFICE AREA) 208 24 196 135 27 77 128 107 - 732 113 QUIET ROOM & LACTATION 160 - 80
BREAK ROOM 130 130 450 - 450
COPY ROOM 310 83 155
SUBTOTAL 440 64 836 415 27 487 515 329 1,620 1,179 1,088 PUBLIC LOBBY 400 100 200 200 200 200 200 800 - 200
WAITING AREA 60 - -
SUBTOTAL 400 100 260 200 - 200 200 200 800 - 200
PUBLIC RESTROOM 360 720 691 360
STAFF RESTROOM - 70 140 - 70
SUBTOTAL 360 - 70 - - - - - 860 691 430
1,200 164 1,166 615 27 687 715 529 4,580 5,030 2,368
2,600 296 2,450 1,684 340 968 1,604 1,336 - - 1,416
3,800 460 3,616 2,299 367 1,655 2,319 1,865 4,580 5,030 3,784 950 115 904 575 92 414 580 466 1,145 1,258 946
4,750 575 4,520 2,873 459 2,069 2,899 2,331 5,725 6,288 4,730 STAFF PARKING 90
VISITOR PARKING 14
WORKERS ON FIELD PARKING 31
324 250
DRAFT 01/10/2020
100
CONFERENCE ROOM 192 250 250 250
192 192 700
TOTAL BLDG AREA 23,870

BUILDING SUPPORT

PARKING AREA REQUIRED

LOBBY & RECEPTION

RESTROOMS

STAFF SUPPORT

NEW WORKSPACE

SUBTOTAL
CIRCULATION & WALLS (25%)

DEPARTMENTAL SUBTOTAL

SUPPORT SPACE SUBTOTAL
FUTURE SPACE REQUIREMENTS TABLE - 2040

SUPPORT SPACE SPACE STANDARDS COUNCIL

CHAMBERS

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATION

DEPARTMENT

FINANCE

DEPARTMENT

LRA DEPARTMENT

PARKS &

RECREATION

DEPARTMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SHARED
COMMON
AREAS

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
3RD ST
TOPEKA

SANTA FE ST
ST
(E) CITY HALL NORTH
(E) CITY HALL SOUTH
(E) SHERIFF
16,050 SF
6,510 SF 9,540 SF
22,700 SF
9,800 SF
6,600 SF
6,600 SF
16,400 SF
(E) HISTORIC
MUSEUM
12,400 SF
(E) TENANT

IMPROVEMENT
SPACE
2,500 SF
2,500 SF
N
0 20' 50' 100'
SCALE: 1" = 50'
1 EXISTING SITE

POSSIBLE FUTURE
SITE

DOWNTOWN SITE OPTIONS DRAFT

POSSIBLE VEHICULAR

CIRCULATION

IMPROVEMENT

HIGH ST

ATCHISON ST
(E) CORP. YARD

OFFICE BDG
(E) CORP. YARD MAINTENCE BDG
(E) CITY SCOUT
BDG
GATE
16,000 SF
700 SF
9,800 SF

POSSIBLE SITE FOR

NEW PUBLIC WORKS
POSSIBLE SITE FOR OFFICE BLDG.

NEW PUBLIC WORKS
OFFICE BLDG.

CORP. YARD SITE
(E)
OPEN
SHED
(E)
OPEN
SHED
(E)
OPEN
SHED
(E)
OPEN
SHED
(E)
OPEN
SHED
(E) LNG
FIELD

STORAGE
N
0 20' 50' 100'
SCALE: 1" = 50'
1 EXISTING SITE

POSSIBLE FUTURE
SITE
CORP. YARD SITE OPTIONS DRAFT
SR. MGMT. ANALYST /

CITY CLERK
SF196 :

HR MGR
SF196 :

HR SEPEC / ADMIN ANALYST II
SF144 :

SR. HR ANALYST
SF144 :

ADM. ASSISTANT
SF64:

ASST. CITY MANAGER
SF196 :

DIRECTOR
SF196 :

SUPERINTENDENT
SF144 :

ADMINISTRATIVE

CLERK I
SF:61

ACOUNTING MGR
SF144 :

ACCOUNT

CLERK I
SF:64
LOBBY
SF203 :

ACCOUNTING TCH
SF100 :

PARKS & REC

DIRECTOR
SF196 :

LRA DIRECTOR
SF196 :

COUSTUMER

SERVICE SUPERV
SF144 :

HOUSING &
ECO. DEV.

SPEC.

SF: 144

ADMIN ANALYST
SF144 :

REC

SUPERVISOR
SF:100
PARKS & FACIL.

MAINT.

SUPERVISOR
SF:100

ACCOUNTANT
SF100 :

ACCOUNTANT
SF100 :

ACCOUNT
CLERK
SF:62

ACCOUNT
CLERK
HOUSING SPEC SF: 62
SF:61

ADM CLERK
SF61:

RECREATION
COORD
SF:100

RECREATION
COORD
SF:100

RECREATION
COORD
SF100 :

ACCOUNT
CLERK
SF: 61
LOBBY
SF201 :

LOBBY
SF: 201
LOBBY
SF100 :

CONF ROOM
SF700 :

CONF ROOM
SF249 :

CONF ROOM
SF249 :

CONF ROOM
SF:249

MECH ROOM
SF398 :

SERVER ROOM
SF401 :

COFFEE BAR
SF47:

JANITOR
SF53:

COFFEE BAR
SF42:

COFFEE
BAR
SF: 42
STOR
SF:246
STOR
SF117 :

STOR
SF70:

STOR
SF70:

QUIET/LACT
SF:82

BREAK RM
SF447 :

COPY RM
SF154 :

UNISEX TOILET
SF72:

PUBLIC RESTROOM
SF: 361

UNISEX TOILET
SF72:

RESTROOMS
SF360 :

CITY MANAGER
SF280 :

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SF: 2,428
MEDIA TECH.

SF100 :

COFFEE BAR
SF42:

LOBBY
SF:399

ELEC ROOM
SF410 :

JANITOR
SF53:

QUIET/LACT
SF82:

COPY RM
SF154 :

UNISEX TOILET
SF72:

RESTROOMS
SF360 :

ADM. SER. DIRECTOR
SF196 :

PUBLIC

INFORMATION

OFFICER
SF:144
ADMIN. ANALYST
SF100 :

PERSONNEL TECH.

SF100 :

ADMIN. ANALYST
SF100 :

ADM. CLERK
SF64:

RECORDS COORD.

SF100 :

HR ANALYST
SF100 :

DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SF100 :

ADMIN.

ASSISTANTCONFIDENTIAL
SF64:

ADMIN. CLERK
SF64:

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT
MGR
SF196 :

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT

ASSISTANT
SF100 :

LOBBY
SF100 :

COFFEE BAR
SF42:

STOR
SF70:

CONF ROOM
SF192 : UNISEX TOILET
SF72:

ADMIN.

ASSISTANT
SF:61

ADM INTERN
SF:61
DEV. SERVICES
ADMIN. MGR
SF196 :

PLANNING &
BLDG. MGR
SF:195

SR COMMUNITY
DEVELOP.

SPECIALIST
SF:144
BLDG

INSPECTOR
SF:143

CITY ENG
SF195 :

CONSTRUCTION

INSPECTOR I
SF:144

PROJECT

COORDINATOR
SF144 :

ENG. TECH
SF143 :

RECYCLING
SF143 :

RECYCLING
SF143 :

ASSIST. PLANNER
SF143 :

GIS COORD.

SF:100

BLDG INSPEC
SF100 :

BLDG INSPEC
SF:100

NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF:100

NEIGHBORDHOOD
BLDG TECH SF: 100 SF60:

ADMIN

ASSISTANT
SF:59
CONSTR/ INSPEC.

SF100 :

ADMIN. ANALYST/MUNI
SF100 :

LOBBY
SF399 :

CONF ROOM
SF249 :

CONF ROOM
SF192 :

CONF ROOM
SF:190

COFFEE BAR
SF:42

MAP ROOM
SF180 :

STOR
SF118 :

STOR
SF70:

ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SF143 :

HOUSING &
ECO. DEV.

SPEC.

SF: 144

ACCOUNTANT
SF100 :

NEIGHBORDHOOD
SF:100

RESTROOMS
SF360 :

LOBBY
SF: 800

CENTRAL CIRCULATION

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
5,500 SF

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT
575 SF
LRA
500 SF

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4,750 SF

ADMINISTRATION
4,520 SF
FINANCE 2,900 SF
PARKS & REC.
2,000 SF
COMMON AREAS 5,300 SF

ACCOUNT

CLERK II
SF:63
ADMIN INTERN SF:64

ACCOUNT

CLERK I
SF: 63
0 8' 16' 32'
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
1 CITY HALL - OPTIMIZED DEPARTMENTAL DEPLOYMENT DIAGRAM 2040 - 24,000 SF DRAFT Item Quantity (units) Unit Cost
($/unit) Subtotal Cost ($) Total Cost ($) Comments
LAND ACQUISITION 0.00 AC $0 $0 TBD
DIRECT CONSTRUCTION COST 24,000 SF $565 $13,555,100
Site Cost - Hypothetical Downtown Site Development 1 LS $1,500,000 $1,500,000 est. allowance Building Cost 24,000 SF $400 $9,600,000 est. allowance
Plumbing & Sanitary Improvements 2,343 SF $250 $585,750 assumes none included General Contractor Markup 24,000 SF $78 $1,869,300
General Conditions 5.5 % $11,100,000 $610,500 on direct site + bldg costs Overhead & Profit 10.0 % $11,100,000 $1,110,000 ` on direct site + bldg costs Bonds 1.34 % $11,100,000 $148,740 on direct site + bldg costs INDIRECT COSTS $3,657,700
Fixtures, furnishings & equipment (FF&E) - loose 24,000 SF $20 $480,000 est. allowance Phones & IT equipment 24,000 SF $10 $240,000 est. allowance Plancheck & permits 0.50 % $13,555,100 $67,776 on direct bldg. + site Utility fees 1 EA $100,000 $100,000 est. allowance
Engineering & design 12.0 % $13,555,100 $1,626,612 on direct bldg. + site Topographical survey 1 EA $15,000 $15,000 est. allowance Geotechnical report and geologic study 1 EA $35,000 $35,000 est. allowance Testing & special inspections 1.0 % $13,555,100 $135,551 on direct bldg. + site Inspector of record (IOR) 14.0 MO $20,000 $280,000 on direct bldg. + site Construction management 5.0 % $13,555,100 $677,755 on direct bldg. + site ESCALATION AND CONTINGENCY $2,541,600
Escalation assumes 2.5 years to midpoint construction @ 3.5%/yr. 8.8 % $13,555,100 $1,186,071 on direct + indirect costs Project contingency @ 10% 10.0 % $13,555,100 $1,355,510 on direct + indirect costs TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT COSTS $19,754,400
Rounded for Fiscal Planning Purposes $19,750,000 est. allowance Civic Building Cost
1 Does not include land acquisition. New $400 /SF Over 10,000 SF Remodel $300 /SF Under 1,000 SF (small job factor)
$250 /SF 1,001 to 9,999 SF
$200 /SF Over 10,000 SF
T.I. $250 /SF 1,001 to 9,999 SF
Plumbing $250 /SF Measured by Kitchen, Toilet Room, Shower footprint RIVERBANK CITY HALL - 2040

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
DRAFT 1/13/20
Note: This evaluation is preliminary only and subject to change based on review of further information as becomes available.

1 CITY OF RIVERBANK
Administration Department
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
Phone: 209.863.7122 - Fax: 209.869.7100
October 5, 2023
Randy High Jr.

PMZ Commercial Real Estate
1120 Scenic Dr.

Modesto, CA
Re: Letter Of Intent to Lease 6436 Oakdale Road, Riverbank, CA Dear Randy:

This letter is an expression of interest, is not intended to be legally binding and shall serve solely as an outline of the basic material terms and conditions under which The City of Riverbank is prepared to proceed with negotiating a definitive lease agreement.

PREMISES: A ±27,462 sf portion of an approximately 42,000 SF free standing office building known as 6426 Oakdale Rd., Riverbank, CA LANDLORD: Built by Burt, Inc.

TENANT: City of Riverbank
USE: City/Government Offices and Related Uses
INITIAL LEASE TERM: Twenty (20) Years
OPTION TO EXTEND: Two (2) Ten Year Options to Extend

BASE RENT SCHEDULE
YEARS 1 - 4: Commencing November 1, 2024:

Year 1: $23,343.00 Per Month ($0.85 psf NNN)
Year 2: $27,462.00 Per Month ($1.00 psf NNN)
Year 3: $31,581.00 Per Month ($1.15 psf NNN)
Year 4: $35,700.00 Per Month ($1.30 psf NNN)

2 CITY OF RIVERBANK
Administration Department
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
Phone: 209.863.7122 - Fax: 209.869.7100

ANNUAL RENT

ADJUSTMENTS
YEARS 5-20: 10% Every Four (4) Years

EFFECTIVE
LEASE DATE: Upon execution by both Landlord and Tenant, expected to be immediately after City Council Approval (November 14th Hearing).

OCCUPANCY or
TURNOVER DATE: June 1, 2024
Tenant shall pay no base rent from Occupancy/Turnover Date through October 31, 2024. However, Tenant shall be responsible for all operating expenses and utilities associated with the property.

RENT COMMENCMENT
DATE November 1, 2024
SECURITY DEPOSIT: None

CONDITION
OF PREMISES: As – Is
NNN LEASE: Tenant shall be responsible for all operating expenses associated with property, including but not limited to Property Taxes, Building Insurance, Common Areas, Roof, Structure, and all utilities associated with premise. In the event Landlord is occupying a portion of premise, Landlord will reimburse Tenant with Landlords share of any utilities that are not separately metered.

SIGNAGE: Tenant at Tenant’s sole expense, and subject to Landlord review and approval shall have the right to place signage on property.

ROFR – RIGHT OF

FIRST RIGHT TO
PURCHASE Tenant desires to purchase property within the first thirty – six (36) months of lease. There is no predetermined fixed purchase price as part of the lease. Tenant and Landlord shall negotiate a

3 CITY OF RIVERBANK
Administration Department
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
Phone: 209.863.7122 - Fax: 209.869.7100
purchase when parties agree to do so. Neither party shall be bound to Buy or Sell, both parties must mutually agree to the price and further terms and conditions of the any purchase.

Tenant shall have a ROFR for the first thirty-six months of the lease.

In the event Landlord chooses to sell or is presented with an unsolicited purchase offer, Landlord shall grant Tenant a one-time ROFR to purchase the property. Landlord shall provide Tenant with the Price and Terms acceptable to Landlord and Tenant shall have Thirty (30) Days to accept. If Tenant chooses not to accept those terms and does not otherwise negotiate an acceptable deal with Landlord (within 30 days) Tenant’s ROFR shall become null and void.

ITEMS SUBSEQUENT
TO TENANT PURCHASE: If City of Riverbank closes escrow on property, Built by Burt, Inc, eContact Live, or American Event Center shall have the right to the following:

Continued, uninterrupted use and operation of its
Data/Servers in Server Room for up to Ten (10) years, rent free. Landlord shall be responsible for any costs associated with maintaining/repairing/removing their Data/Server
equipment.

The right to rent back the Event Center space for a period not to exceed Sixty (60) Months from City of Riverbank
closing escrow. Rent shall be $XXXX per month. Parties
could decide to extend the lease if Tenant delays expansion plans into Event Center (for council chambers or other).

BROKERS: PMZ Commercial Real Estate (Randy High) exclusively represents Landlord. Is the only broker involved in this transaction and shall be compensated by Landlord/Seller based upon separate agreement with Landlord/Seller.

This letter shall not constitute a formal and binding agreement. This letter shall not create any legal rights or obligations between the parties. It is intended that all legal rights and obligations between the undersigned parties will come into existence only when a definitive Lease agreement is signed and delivered, properly authorized, by all parties. This letter of intent shall expire at 5:00pm on October 13, 2023.

Accepted and agreed this _____ day of October 2023:

4 CITY OF RIVERBANK
Administration Department
6707 Third Street, Riverbank, CA 95367
Phone: 209.863.7122 - Fax: 209.869.7100
“Tenant”
City of Riverbank.

By: _______________________________

“Landlord”
______________________________
By: _________________________
Name: ______________________
Its: _________________________
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
DRAFT
RED AREA - American Event Center Subleased Area
BLUE AREA - Data & Server Area to be used by Lessor/Seller DRAFT

← All documents from this meeting