Cities Index.
Agenda, closed session, second session

City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority / Public Financing Authority
May 27, 2025

Document
Agenda, closed session, second session
Meeting
May 27, 2025
Body
City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority / Public Financing Authority
Pages
10
Original file
65.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.riverbank.org. That file is the official record.

Description of Delhi
Setting
Landform: Dunes on valleys
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope, backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise
Microfeatures of landform position: Hummocks
Down-slope shape: Convex, linear
Across-slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Wind modified sandy alluvium derived from granitoid Custom Soil Resource Report
19 Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sand
C1 - 8 to 40 inches: sand
C2 - 40 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dello
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
DhB—Delhi sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, MLRA 17
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2ss9x
Elevation: 30 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 310 days
Custom Soil Resource Report
20 Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Delhi and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Delhi
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Wind modified sandy alluvium derived from granite Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sand
H2 - 12 to 44 inches: sand
H3 - 44 to 68 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 3 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.3 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
21 FoA—Foster very fine sandy loam, very porly drained, slightly salinealkali, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjbz
Elevation: 10 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 275 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Foster and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Foster
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: very fine sandy loam
H2 - 10 to 40 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 40 to 60 inches: loamy sand, silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Slightly saline to moderately saline (4.0 to 8.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 5.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Custom Soil Resource Report
22 Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Temple
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GfA—Grangeville fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes, MLRA 17 Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vncx
Elevation: 30 to 1,760 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 25 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 240 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Grangeville
Setting
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 12 to 79 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
23 Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 2 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 3.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Traver
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, hydric
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains, alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, channeled
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans on alluvial fans, channels on flood plains on alluvial fans, channels on flood plains on flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
24 GmA—Grangeville very fine sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcd
Elevation: 10 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Grangeville
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam
H2 - 7 to 40 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 40 to 60 inches: loamy sand, silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
25 Minor Components
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Fans
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GnA—Grangeville very fine sandy loam, slightly saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcf
Elevation: 10 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Grangeville
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam
H2 - 7 to 40 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 40 to 60 inches: loamy sand, silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
26 Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Slightly saline to moderately saline (4.0 to 8.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 5.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.4 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Fans
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
GoA—Grangeville very fine sandy loam, moderately saline-alkali, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcg
Elevation: 10 to 1,800 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 16 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
27 Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Grangeville
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: very fine sandy loam
H2 - 7 to 40 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 40 to 60 inches: loamy sand, silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Moderately saline to strongly saline (8.0 to 16.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 10.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Fans
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Ecological site: R017XY907CA - Aridic Alkali Desert
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
28 GsA—Greenfield sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcj
Elevation: 100 to 3,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Greenfield and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Greenfield
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 21 inches: fine sandy loam
H2 - 21 to 42 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 42 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
29 Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Snelling
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
GvA—Greenfield sandy loam, deep over hardpan, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcl
Elevation: 100 to 3,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Greenfield and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Greenfield
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 21 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 21 to 40 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 40 to 60 inches: cemented
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 38 to 54 inches to duripan Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/hr)
Custom Soil Resource Report
30 Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY902CA - Duripan Vernal Pools
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Snelling
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
HbA—Hanford fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcn
Elevation: 150 to 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
31 H2 - 12 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
HbmA—Hanford fine sandy loam, moderately deep over sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjcp
Elevation: 150 to 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
32 Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
H2 - 12 to 36 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 36 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
33 HdA—Hanford sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjct
Elevation: 150 to 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 20 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 12 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.1 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
34 Minor Components
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
HdpA—Hanford sandy loam, moderately deep over silt, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjd0
Elevation: 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 12 to 36 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 36 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
35 Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
HdsA—Hanford sandy loam, deep over silt, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjd1
Elevation: 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hanford
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
36 Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous rock
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 12 to 48 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 48 to 60 inches: silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.5 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Tujunga
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
HfA—Hilmar loamy sand, 0 to 1 percent
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjd3
Elevation: 300 to 900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 230 to 300 days
Custom Soil Resource Report
37 Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Hilmar and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Hilmar
Setting
Landform: Fan skirts
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Wind modified sandy alluvium derived from granite over silty alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
H2 - 7 to 21 inches: sand
H3 - 21 to 29 inches: sandy loam
H4 - 29 to 60 inches: very fine sandy loam, silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Very slightly saline to moderately saline (2.0 to 8.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Delhi
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
38 MdA—Madera sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjdz
Elevation: 20 to 250 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 14 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Madera and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Madera
Setting
Landform: Fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 9 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 9 to 19 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 19 to 30 inches: clay
H4 - 30 to 36 inches: indurated
H5 - 36 to 60 inches: coarse sandy loam, clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches; 20 to 40 inches to duripan Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.3 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 4s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
39 Minor Components
Alamo
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
MmA—Modesto clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjf3
Elevation: 40 to 200 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 300 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Modesto and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Modesto
Setting
Landform: Fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 12 inches: clay loam
H2 - 12 to 35 inches: clay
H3 - 35 to 55 inches: sandy clay loam
H4 - 55 to 62 inches: silty clay
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Custom Soil Resource Report
40 Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Chualar
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dinuba
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Rr—Riverwash
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjgp
Elevation: 700 to 2,900 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 8 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F
Frost-free period: 110 to 180 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Riverwash: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Riverwash
Setting
Landform: Drainageways
Parent material: Gravelly alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: gravelly sand
H2 - 10 to 60 inches: gravelly sand, extremely gravelly sand Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Custom Soil Resource Report
41 Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Frequency of flooding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 1.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
SaA—San Joaquin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes, MLRA 17 Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2vncw
Elevation: 90 to 520 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 17 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 62 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 240 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
San joaquin and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of San Joaquin
Setting
Landform: Terraces, fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, tread Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 - 9 to 15 inches: sandy clay loam
2Bt2 - 15 to 21 inches: clay
2Bkqm - 21 to 37 inches: cemented material
2C - 37 to 79 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches; 19 to 25 inches to duripan Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 8 to 12 inches
Custom Soil Resource Report
42 Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.1 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 4s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Snelling
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Terraces, fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, tread Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Alamo
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Terraces, fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, tread Microfeatures of landform position: Open depressions, open depressions Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R017XY902CA - Duripan Vernal Pools
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, hydric
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Terraces, open depressions on fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, tread Microfeatures of landform position: Open depressions
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
TuA—Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjhj
Elevation: 10 to 2,500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 25 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 64 degrees F
Custom Soil Resource Report
43 Frost-free period: 280 to 350 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Tujunga and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Tujunga
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
H2 - 10 to 60 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.3 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Foster
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Hanford
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
44 Tx—Terrace escarpments
Map Unit Composition
Terrace escarpments: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Terrace Escarpments
Setting
Landform: Terraces
Parent material: Alluvium
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 60 inches: variable
Properties and qualities
Slope: 30 to 50 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 0 to 60 inches to paralithic bedrock Drainage class: Excessively drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/hr)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 0.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

WmC—Whitney sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hjj0
Elevation: 200 to 500 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 250 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Custom Soil Resource Report
45 Map Unit Composition
Whitney and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Whitney
Setting
Landform: Fan remnants
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
H1 - 0 to 7 inches: sandy loam
H2 - 7 to 31 inches: sandy loam
H3 - 31 to 35 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rocklin
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Montpellier
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
46 San Joaquin County, California
127—Chuloak coarse sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhrv
Elevation: 70 to 100 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 260 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Chuloak and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Chuloak
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 19 inches: coarse sandy loam
Bt - 19 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 44 to 55 inches: fine sandy loam
C2 - 55 to 64 inches: loamy coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.1 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Delhi
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
47 Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Manteca
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Tinnin
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
130—Columbia fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 17 Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xld1
Elevation: 10 to 130 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 19 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 62 degrees F
Frost-free period: 318 to 328 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Columbia and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Columbia
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: fine sandy loam
A - 4 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
C1 - 12 to 21 inches: silt loam
C2 - 21 to 26 inches: fine sandy loam
C3 - 26 to 34 inches: silt loam
C4 - 34 to 40 inches: loamy fine sand
C5 - 40 to 48 inches: fine sandy loam
C6 - 48 to 60 inches: loamy fine sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 4 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
48 Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low (0.01 to

0.14 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: RareNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.0 mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 1.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.8 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: R016XA002CA - Freshwater, Stratified, Fluventic Sites (PROVISIONAL)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Guard
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Rims
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Cogna
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Terraces, alluvial fans
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R018XI999CA - Miscellaneous - Cannot Be Correlated Hydric soil rating: No
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia, fine-textured overwash
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Merritt
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
49 Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Dello
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains on sloughs
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R016XA001CA - Tidally-Influenced, Freshwater Sites (PROVISIONAL)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Egbert
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R016XA001CA - Tidally-Influenced, Freshwater Sites (PROVISIONAL)
Hydric soil rating: Yes
131—Columbia fine sandy loam, partially drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhrz
Elevation: 10 to 100 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 14 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 230 to 340 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Columbia and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Columbia
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
50 Parent material: Alluvium derived from mixed rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 12 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Merritt
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Dello
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, buried substratum
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, sand surface layer
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
51 132—Columbia fine sandy loam, channeled, partially drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhs0
Elevation: 10 to 60 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 230 to 340 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and either protected from flooding or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Columbia and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Columbia
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from mixed rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 12 to 60 inches: stratified sand to silt loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.1 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 4w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
52 Minor Components
Merritt
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, sand surface layer
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dello
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, buried substratum
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
142—Delhi loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes, MLRA 17
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2ss9g
Elevation: 30 to 150 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 60 to 64 degrees F
Frost-free period: 225 to 300 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Delhi and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Delhi
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans, sand sheets, flood plains, dunes Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear, convex
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite
Typical profile
Ap1 - 0 to 3 inches: loamy sand
Ap2 - 3 to 8 inches: loamy sand
A - 8 to 16 inches: loamy sand
Custom Soil Resource Report
53 C1 - 16 to 26 inches: loamy sand
C2 - 26 to 44 inches: sand
C3 - 44 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Tinnin
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Honcut
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
144—Dello sand, partially drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhsd
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Dello and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Custom Soil Resource Report
54 Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Dello
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 20 inches: sand
C - 20 to 60 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 48 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Fluaquents
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Columbia
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY903CA - Stream Channels and Floodplains Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, stratified substratum
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
55 166—Grangeville fine sandy loam, partially drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hht3
Elevation: 10 to 50 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 14 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Grangeville
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 20 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 20 to 60 inches: stratified loamy sand to silt loam Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.2 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
56 Minor Components
Unnamed, throughout
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, altered soils
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Dello
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Columbia
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Merritt
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Egbert
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
175—Honcut sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhtd
Elevation: 30 to 120 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Honcut and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Honcut
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Custom Soil Resource Report
57 Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 21 inches: sandy loam
C - 21 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Delhi
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Tinnin
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Chuloak
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
58 197—Merritt silty clay loam, partially drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhv3
Elevation: 0 to 50 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Merritt and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Merritt
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from mixed rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 17 inches: silty clay loam
B - 17 to 49 inches: silt loam
C - 49 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2w
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Custom Soil Resource Report
59 Minor Components
Egbert
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Ryde
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, ponded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Depressions
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Guard
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Rims
Hydric soil rating: Yes
201—Nord loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhv7
Elevation: 50 to 70 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Nord and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Nord
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from mixed rock sources Custom Soil Resource Report
60 Typical profile
A - 0 to 25 inches: loam
C - 25 to 60 inches: stratified sandy loam to loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Merritt
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: Yes
Delhi
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Honcut
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, gravelly throughout
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, slightly brittle substratum
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
61 214—Pits, gravel
Map Unit Composition
Pits: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Pits
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 8s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dumps
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Xerorthents
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
254—Timor loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhwy
Elevation: 20 to 40 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Timor and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Timor
Setting
Landform: Fan skirts
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Custom Soil Resource Report
62 Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bk - 14 to 56 inches: loamy sand
2Bkqm - 56 to 60 inches: cemented
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to duripan Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.5 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY902CA - Duripan Vernal Pools
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Bisgani
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, hardpan above 40 inches
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Tinnin
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, mod fine text above hardpan
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
63 255—Tinnin loamy coarse sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhwz
Elevation: 20 to 70 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Tinnin and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Tinnin
Setting
Landform: Alluvial fans
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 28 inches: loamy coarse sand
C1 - 28 to 53 inches: loamy coarse sand
C2 - 53 to 75 inches: loamy coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 3.9 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
64 Minor Components
Delhi
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Honcut
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Manteca
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, med tex substratum
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Timor
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Ecological site: R017XY904CA - Subirrigated Deep Alluvial Fans Hydric soil rating: No
259—Tujunga loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhx3
Elevation: 40 to 70 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition
Tujunga and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Tujunga
Setting
Landform: Channels, flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Custom Soil Resource Report
65 Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from granitic rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 22 inches: loamy sand
C - 22 to 67 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Negligible
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: RareNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.4 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Honcut
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tokay
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, gravelly & coarse textured
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
66 266—Veritas fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: hhxb
Elevation: 20 to 80 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 11 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 degrees F
Frost-free period: 270 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Veritas and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Veritas
Setting
Landform: Fan skirts
Landform position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Alluvium derived from mixed rock sources Typical profile
A - 0 to 15 inches: fine sandy loam
Bk - 15 to 54 inches: fine sandy loam
2Bqm - 54 to 70 inches: cemented
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to duripan Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 3 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.6 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Ecological site: R017XY902CA - Duripan Vernal Pools
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
67 Minor Components
Grangeville
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, mod fine textured surface
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Bisgani
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Unnamed, w/ mod fine texture above hardpan
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Madera
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Jahant
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Unnamed, w/ hardpan above 40 inches
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
Tinnin
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
68 Stanislaus County, California, Northern Part
130—Columbia sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1j3cc
Elevation: 40 to 150 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 230 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Columbia, rarely flooded, and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Columbia, Rarely Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Coarse-loamy alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 13 inches: sandy loam
C - 13 to 60 inches: stratified sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneRare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.1 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Honcut, fine sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Custom Soil Resource Report
69 Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia, occasionally flooded
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Cogna, rarely flooded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Cogna, overwashed
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Mine dredge tailings
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Riverwash
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
201—Nord loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 1j3cs
Elevation: 100 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 230 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated
Map Unit Composition
Nord, loam, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Nord, Loam
Setting
Landform: Fan skirts
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Custom Soil Resource Report
70 Parent material: Coarse-loamy alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 25 inches: loam
C - 25 to 50 inches: loam
Ck - 50 to 60 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneRare
Frequency of ponding: None
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 4 percent
Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 10.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.0 inches) Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 1
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Honcut, gravelly sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Delhi, loamy sand
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Sand sheets
Hydric soil rating: No
Columbia, sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Chuloak, sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Alluvial fans
Hydric soil rating: No
Veritas, fine sandy loam
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Custom Soil Resource Report
71 W—Water
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
72 References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition.

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.

Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31.

Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.

Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.

Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States.

National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section.

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1.

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 73 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/? cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf Custom Soil Resource Report
74 Appendix C
Aquatic Resource Delineation Map
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-1
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-1 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-3
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-2 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-5
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-3 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-7
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-4 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-9
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-5 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report C-11
Source: Adapted by Ascent in 2025.

Figure C-6 Aquatic Resources Delineation
Appendix D
Photographs
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report D-1
Source: Ascent Environmental.

Storage Ponds. Photograph taken facing southeast. Photo Point #1.

Source: Ascent Environmental.

Storage Ponds. Photograph taken facing southwest. Photo Point #1.

Aquatic Resources Report Ascent
City of Riverbank Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project D-2 Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Source: Ascent Environmental.

Irrigation Runoff. Photograph taken facing southeast. Photo Point #2.

Source: Ascent Environmental.

Remnant Ditch. Photograph taken facing southwest. Photo Point #3.

Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report D-3
Source: Ascent Environmental.

Remnant Ditch along access road. Photo taken facing southeast. Photo Point #3.

Aquatic Resources Report Ascent
City of Riverbank Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project D-4 Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Source: Ascent Environmental.

Remnant Ditch along access road. Photo taken facing northwest. Photo Point #4
Ascent Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project City of Riverbank Aquatic Resource Delineation Report D-5
Source: Ascent Environmental.

Remnant Ditch along access road. Photo taken facing northwest. Photo Point #4.

Aquatic Resources Report Ascent
City of Riverbank Riverbank Regional Recycled Water Project D-6 Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 1 of 3 ends

Item 11.2– CC/LRA – 05/27/2025

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL/ LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.2
SECTION 11: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: May 27, 2025
Subject: Resolution to Approve an Option for Street Sweeping Services
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted By: Tammy Alcantor, Assistant City Manager
Cody Bridgewater, Director of Public Works
Kathleen Cleek, Capital Projects/Regulatory Compliance Mgr.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council review and approve one of the three proposed options for street sweeping services. Staff recommends approval of option 2A as the preferred course of action.

SUMMARY
On November 12, 2024, the City Manager received a letter from Gilton Solid Waste Management Inc. stating their intent to discontinue providing street sweeping services for the City of Riverbank. In December 2024, the City sent out a Request for Proposal for Street Sweeping Services, which were due by January 21, 2025.

The City received 1 proposal from Sweeping Corp of America (SCA).

Staff has spent the last few months gathering pros and cons and financial information on various options for street sweeping services in Riverbank. The options below are based on sweeping residential streets and roads twice per month, commercial/downtown areas once per week, and parks parking lots twice per month.

The options are as follows:

OPTION 1 – Contract with Sweeping Corp of America
The pros of contracting street sweeping services are that the contractor furnishes all labor, supervision, materials, equipment, fuel, and transportation. The contractor is

Page 2 of 3 ends

Item 11.2– CC/LRA – 05/27/2025
responsible for all maintenance services and costs. Contractor has employed highly qualified experienced drivers and a back up sweeper will always be available.

The cons of contracting out the street sweeping services is the City would have no local control and the yearly costs of services.

OPTION 1 – Contract with Sweeping Corp of America
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3 Yr Cost
$250,192.00 $260,199.68 $270,607.67 $780,999.35
OPTION 2A – City Staff with City Purchase Sweeper (One-Time Funds) The pros of sweeping in-house include quicker response time for complaints, missed routes, accidents, or emergencies. There are no additional costs associated with callouts. The sweeper can be utilized for City projects and events at no additional cost. Adding a full-time staff member would also provide additional support in the maintenance shop, reducing, or eliminating the need for part-time help. Higher level of service and attention to detail over outside contractors and approximately half the cost of only responding bidder for RFP.

The cons of sweeping in-house include the need to hire an additional full-time staff member, which increases on-going personnel costs. There will also be higher fuel expenses and an increase in equipment maintenance requirements due to more frequent use. Additionally, there is no backup sweeping unit available, which could present challenges if the primary unit experiences mechanical issues or downtime.

Staff received quotes for sweeper trucks from three (3) vendors, as follows:

Ravo R5-iSeries: $324,448.66
Schwarze Model A4 Storm $334,319.44
Tymco Model 600 $372,152.57
If option 2A is selected by City Council, Staff proposes that we purchase the Tymco Model 600, as it is the same unit that is currently operated by Gilton Solid Waste.

This allows us to take advantage of the wealth of maintenance knowledge and experience that Gilton has with this equipment. Tymco is the leading manufacturer and selected brand in the sweeping industry.

OPTION 2A – City Purchase Sweeper
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3-Yr Cost
$507,093.26* $148,434.29 $163,277.72 $818,805.27
*Includes the purchase of the sweeper, a one-time cost.

This option is only $37,800 more than Option 1 for the three-year period.

OPTION 2B – City Purchase Sweeper through a Lease Option

Page 3 of 3 ends

Item 11.2– CC/LRA – 05/27/2025
Lease options included are:

City Purchase Sweeper with a 4-Year Term
City Purchase Sweeper with a 5-Year Term
City Purchase Sweeper with a 6-Year Term
The pros and cons are the same as Option 2A. The only difference would be the costs detailed below:

OPTION 2B – City Purchase Sweeper through a Lease
Term Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3-Yr Cost
4-Year $234,240.26 $247,734.29 $262,577.72 $744,552.27
5-Year $216,240.26 $229,734.29 $244,577.72 $690,552.27
6-Year $204,440.26 $217,934.29 $232,777.72 $655,152.27

FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s contract with Gilton for street sweeping services is currently at an annual cost of $118,621.68, which is funded through the Gas Tax Fund. In recent years, the General Fund's support for the Gas Tax Fund has continued to increase. Any additional expenditure beyond the existing Gilton contract amount would require further support from the General Fund.

OPTION 1 – Contract with Sweeping Corp of America
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3 Yr Cost
$250,192.00 $260,199.68 $270,607.67 $780,999.35
OPTION 2A – City Purchase Sweeper
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3-Yr Cost
$507,093.26* $148,434.29 $163,277.72 $818,805.27
*Includes the purchase of the sweeper, a one-time cost.

OPTION 2B – City Purchase Sweeper through a Lease
Term Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total 3-Yr Cost
4-Year $234,240.26 $247,734.29 $262,577.72 $744,552.27
5-Year $216,240.26 $229,734.29 $244,577.72 $690,552.27
6-Year $204,440.26 $217,934.29 $232,777.72 $655,152.27

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Sweeping Corp of America Proposal

3. Purchase quote for Tymco 600 Sweeper Truck

4. Estimated Cost of Street Sweeping Options

Page 1 of 2 ends

CC/LRA- 05/27/2025
CC Resolution 2025-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 20205-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK APPROVING OPTION 2A TO PURCHASE STREET SWEEPER AND PROVIDE

STREET SWEEPING IN-HOUSE

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, The City received a letter from Gilton Solid Waste Management Inc. stating their intent to discontinue providing street sweeping services; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for street sweeping services and received one proposal from Sweeping Corp of America; and WHEREAS, staff presented three options to the City Council for consideration regarding future street sweeping services; and
WHEREAS, option 1 involves contracting with Sweeping Corp of America for street sweeping services; and
WHEREAS, option 2A involves the City purchasing a street sweeper and providing street sweeping services in-house with city staff; and WHEREAS, option 2B involves the City leasing a street sweeper and providing street sweeping services in-house; and
WHEREAS, option 2A is the preferred option, which includes the purchase of a Tymco Model 600 sweeper at a cost of $372,152.57; and
WHEREAS, under Option 2A, the City will assume responsibility for providing street sweeping services in-house.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby approves Option 2A to purchase a street sweeper and provide street sweeping services in-house.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May, 2025; motioned by Councilmember , seconded by Councilmember , and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of :

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC/LRA- 05/27/2025
CC Resolution 2025-
AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
__________________________ __________________________
Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor
ATTACHMENT 2

SourceweliSiS
AwdcdContiact Sourcewell Quote Form v2.0A - Sourcewell Contract #111522-TYM Feb. 2, 2023 - Feb. 3, 2027 /rc6inc/MtnT/un SMEcn/fs
Customer / Sourcewell Member; City of Riverbank, CA
Sourcewell Member#; 116628
Customer Contact Name; Cody Bridgewater, Director of Public Works Customer Phone #: 209.869.7128
Customer E-Mail: [email protected]
Quote Date: 3/7/2025
Quote Validity;|30 Days
Quoted By: Kaye Morgan
TYMCO Dealer; GCS Environmental Services
TYMCO Dealer Contact; Tracy Pinkston
Purchasing Details: Issue Purchase Orders to TYMCO, Inc., ATTN: Kaye Morgan ([email protected] | 254-799-5546).

Quote is Good for 30 Days {Unless Otherwise Noted Above) | Pricing is Quoted in US Dollars (USD) | Payment Terms: Net 30 Days MODEL 600® SWEEPER STANDARD EQUIPMENT
Auxiliary Engine: John Deere diesel turbocharged 4045T Final Tier 4; 4 cylinder; 4.5 L (275 CID); 99 HP @ 2200 RPM; Torque 315 ft. lb. @ 1600 RPM; fuel/water separator, fuel filter; Donaldson PowerCore ® air filter with scavenged pre-filter; Remote oil filter; 3.8 useable gallon Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) tank. Includes John Deere Standard Warranty coverage 2 Years / Amber Beacon Light - LED: SAE Class l/California Title 13 compliant with protective limb guard.

Auxiliary Engine In-Cab Air Filter Restriction Indicator with Gauge: A filter restriction gauge included on the in-cab BlueLogic display with an audio and visual high restriction indicator.

Auxiliary Engine Protection System: Engine ECU to provide automatic engine monitoring with derate or shutdown when engine problem is detected such as high coolant temperature or low oil pressure.

Auxiliary Fuse Panel: A 12V DC fused power source panel for any needed additional electrical components or accessories, i.e. radios, warning lights, controls, etc.

Back-Up Alarm: ECCO Model 510; SAE Type C 97dB
BlueLoeic® Control System: Multiplexed electrical system includes hardware and TYMCO designed software that integrates the in-cab controls to the auxiliary engine and all sweeper functions; as well as provides intelligent safety features. The BlueLogic Control System provides sweeper and auxiliary engine data to the operator through the touchscreen display and the multiplexed switch pack. The display is pedestal mounted for improved visibility and includes hour meters (Trip and Total) for the auxiliary engine, gutter brooms, pick-up head, blower, water pump, and BAH broom if applicable; sweeper odometer (records curb miles swept and sweeping hours), service reminders, custom reminders, overspeed warning, low water audible alarm, dust control system winterization guide and On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) for the auxiliary engine and sweeper.

Duo Skids: Warranted for 2 Years / 2000 hours prorated
Dust Control System: 220 gallon capacity polyethylene water tank (Extra Water capacities available); 5 gpm electric diaphragm type pump; low water audible alarm and message on BlueLogic display; external water level indicator; spray nozzles around pick-up head, gutter broom(s) and inside hopper. Peterbilt 156", Autocar 152" Diesel and Autocar 171" CNG chassis REQUIRES Extra Water Capacity (Refer to Dust Control Options Section).

Gutter Brooms, Twin; LED Floodlights and Parabolic Mirrors: Left and right side mounted 43" diameter wire filled digger type; adjustable LED floodlight for each gutter broom; 10.5" parabolic mirrors. Parabolic Mirrors N/A with Cabover Chassis.

High Capacity Dust Separator
Hydraulic System Protection: Hydraulic filter restriction indicator mounted in filter manifold; sight level gauge mounted on tank. BlueLogic control system continually monitors oil temperature.

LED Alternating Warning Light Set: Rear mounted oval lights (2).

LED Stoo/Turn/Tail/Clearance Lights
Pressure Bleeder: Air pressure is deflected out, allowing additional suction across the front of pick-up head.

Rear Mounted LED Floodlights (Z)
Rear View Camera System: 3rd Eye®, heavy duty rear infrared camera with 7" color monitor mounted in cab Reverse Pick-Up Head System: Assists in backing up with Pick-Up Head down Rubber Lined Blower: Warranty: 1 year /1,000 hours prorated Water Fill Hose & Rack: Flexible 20 foot long water tank fill hose with 2-1/2 inch hydrant coupling with rack mount. System incorporates air gap.

Work Platform: Easily accessible work platform located between truck cab and sweeper. Standard equipment with conventional chassis with 165" WB and horizontal exhaust. Not available with Extra Water Capacity or Chassis Vertical Exhaust.

Sweeper Warranty: 1 Year / lOOO Hours. Contact factory for details.

Sourcewell Ext
(Includes 5% Discount) Section/Type Qty Model 600® Sweeper and Cab/Chassis Equipment Sourcewell Price 600000 1 Model 600® Sweeper with Standard Equipment (Base Price) $196,443.00 $186,620.00 1 AUXILIARY ENGINE | HYDRAULIC OPTIONS:
600053 1 Auxiliary Hydraulic System $1,232.00 $1,170.00 2 GUTTER BROOM OPTIONS:
600022 1 Gutter Broom Tilt Adjuster: Right $900.00 $855.00 600022 1 Gutter Broom Tilt Adjuster: Left $900.00 $855.00 3 DUST CONTROL SYSTEM OPTIONS:

Unpublished 1 Additional Hopper Nozzle $422.00 $400.00

Page 1 of 3 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
Sourceweli Ext
(Includes 5% Discount) Section/Type Qty Model 600® Sweeper and Cab/Chassts Equipment Sourceweli Price A.O.D. (Air Operated Diaphragm) Water Pump with Wash Down Hose & Gun (Exchange) 600004 1 $2,227.00 $2,115.00
600021 1 Extra Water Capacity ● 330 Gallons: COMDEX® $5,022.00 $4,770.00 Low Emissions Package
*South Coast AQMD Rule 1186 Compliant 600077 1 $1,706.00 $1,620.00 Unpublished 1 Water Tank Level Gauge $632.00 $600.00
4 HOPPER OPTIONS:
600036 1 Abrasion Protection Package $1,090.00 $1,035.00 600084 1 Dump Switch in Cab $237.00 $225.00
600020 1 Hopper Drain System (Standard) - Mild Steel $569.00 $540.00 600043 1 Sweeper Deluge System $1,137.00 $1,080.00
5 PICK-UP HEAD OPTIONS:
601000 1 Broom Assist Pick-Up Head (Exchange) $5,543.00 $5,265.00 Double Duo Skids (4" wide) with Skid Bumper Extension Set (3") (Exchange) Unpublished 1 $2,106.00 $2,000.00
600075 1 Linear Actuator w/Gauge - Pressure Bleeder $522.00 $495.00 600063 1 Pick-Up Head Curtain Lifter $1,706.00 $1,620.00 Unpublished 1 Pick-Up Head Pressure Inlet Water Injection System $1,895.00 $1,800.00 6 AUXILIARY HAND HOSE OPTIONS:
600035 1 Auxiliary Hand Hose $1,374.00 $1,305.00
7 STAINLESS STEEL OPTIONS:

Stainless Steel Hopper Screen Upgrade: Stainless Steel Standard Screen (Split) Unpublished 1 $843.00 $800.00
8 AIRPORT OPTIONS:
9 SWEEPER ADDITIONAL OPTIONS:

Camera System - Standard Rear Camera and One Additional Camera 600008-B 1 $1,137.00 $1,080.00
Location: Pick-Up Head - Full Width
Unpublished 1 Limb Guard $211.00 $200.00
Unpublished 1 Sweeper Paint; TYMCO Standard White $0.00 $0.00 10 UNPUBLISHED | SPECIAL SWEEPER OPTIONS:

Unpublished 1 Auto Sweep Assist (ASA) $2,632.00 $2,500.00 Unpublished 1 Surcharge - Base Sweeper Unit $5,275.00 $5,010.00 Section / Type Qty Model 600® Cab/Chassis Equipment Sourceweli Price Sourceweli Ext 11 CAB I CHASSIS:
2025 Freightliner M2-106 PLUS, 33,000 lb. GVWR, 165'' WB, Diesel (1-SPD) EPA
♦For Use in CARB 2 & EPA States Only
600709 1 $117,175.00 $117,175.00
DEDUCT; 2024 Freightliner M2-106 Legacy, 33,000 lb. GVWR, 165' WB, Diesel (1-SPD) CARB
♦For Use in CARB 1, CARB 2 & EPA States
Unpublished 1 -$8,500.00 -$8,500.00
12 CHASSIS ADDITIONAL OPTIONS:

Unpublished 1 Fire Extinguisher $100.00 $100.00
Unpublished 1 Hazard Reflectors $100.00 $100.00
Unpublished 2 Parabolic Mirror Head -12" (Exchange) $75.00 $150.00 Unpublished 1 Truck Paint: Standard Factory White $0.00 $0.00 13 UNPUBLISHED | SPECIAL CHASSIS OPTIONS:
14 DEALER UNPUBLISHED OPTIONS;
15 TOTAL COST OF ACQUISITION COSTS
1 Freight / PDI / Inservice $12,000.00 $12,000.00
1 CA Sales Tax (7.875%) $27,167.57 $27,167.57

Page 2 of 3 ends

Sourcewell Ext
(Includes 5% Discount) Section / Type Qty Model 600* Sweeper and Cab/ChassIs Equipment Sourcewell Price Purchasing Details: Issue Purchase Orders to TYMCO, Inc., ATTN: Kaye Morgan ([email protected] | 254-799-5546).

Quote is Good for 30 Days (Unless Otherwise Noted Above) | Pricing is Quoted in US Dollars (USD) | Payment Terms: Net 30 Days Total Price $372,152.57
FOB
Delivery ARO
Riverbank, CA
270-365 Days - See NOTE Below
^Pricing Details: TYMCO, Inc. offers Sourcewell Members a 5% discount on all base sweeper models and sweeper options from the Sourcewell Price Catalog (Base + Items in Sections 1 through 10). Chassis, chassis options, dealer unpublished options and Total Cost of Acquisition Costs (Items in Sections 11 -15) are not discountable. The Sourcewell Discount shown above is reflective of 5% of all applicable items on this quote.

Notes 1. Note: Delivery Subject to Truck Availability

Page 3 of 3 ends

Estimated Cost of Street Sweeping Options
OPTION 1 – RFP Response -Sweeping Corp of America
Year Total Cost
1 $250,192.00
2 $260,199.68
3 $270,607.67
OPTION 2A – City Purchase Sweeper (One-Time Monies - General Fund) Year StaƯ Cost Fuel Cost Maintenance Cost Total Cost
1 $106,628.16 $3,312.10 $25,000.00 $134,940.26
2 $117,290.98 $3,643.31 $27,500.00 $148,434.29
3 $129,020.08 $4,007.64 $30,250.00 $163,277.72
OPTION 2B – Lease Purchase (4-Year Term)
Year StaƯ Cost Lease Payment Fuel Cost Maintenance Cost Total Cost 1 $106,628.16 $99,300.00 $3,312.10 $25,000.00 $234,240.26 2 $117,290.98 $99,300.00 $3,643.31 $27,500.00 $247,734.29 3 $129,020.08 $99,300.00 $4,007.64 $30,250.00 $262,577.72 OPTION 2B – Lease Purchase (5-Year Term)
Year StaƯ Cost Lease Payment Fuel Cost Maintenance Cost Total Cost 1 $106,628.16 $81,300.00 $3,312.10 $25,000.00 $216,240.26 2 $117,290.98 $81,300.00 $3,643.31 $27,500.00 $229,734.29 3 $129,020.08 $81,300.00 $4,007.64 $30,250.00 $244,577.72 OPTION 2B – Lease Purchase (6-Year Term)
Year StaƯ Cost Lease Payment Fuel Cost Maintenance Cost Total Cost 1 $106,628.16 $69,500.00 $3,312.10 $25,000.00 $204,440.26 2 $117,290.98 $69,500.00 $3,643.31 $27,500.00 $217,934.29 3 $129,020.08 $69,500.00 $4,007.64 $30,250.00 $232,777.72 ATTACHMENT 4

Page 1 of 2 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA – 05/27/2025

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11.3
SECTION 11: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: May 27, 2025
Subject: Resolution to Adopt a Facility Rental Fee Waiver Policy for CityOwned Facilities From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Michael Patton, Parks and Recreation Director

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopts a Facility Rental Fee Waiver Policy for City-Owned Facilities.

SUMMARY
Under direction from the City Council, the Parks and Recreation Department has created a policy that would provide the City Manager or the Parks and Recreation Director authority to approve requests for waiver of facility rental fees on city-owned facilities. This policy would eliminate the current practice of all requests having to be presented and approved by the City Council. The policy, its procedures, and other related forms were presented to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee on May 21, 2025 for their approval. The committee voted unanimously 5-0 to recommend the proposed policy for approval from the city council.

BACKGROUND
Throughout the year 2024, the Parks and Recreation Department received multiple requests from local nonprofits and organizations to use city-owned facilities to host their community events and fundraisers. In their requests, many organizations requested that the facility rental fees be waived. Since the City does not have an established policy, each request was taken to the City Council for their approval. After so many requests, the City Council provided direction for the Parks and Recreation Department to create a policy that would give city staff the authority to waive facility rental fees within established parameters.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Item 11.3 – CC/LRA – 05/27/2025
The Parks and Recreation Director has prepared a policy that would provide the City Manager or the Parks and Recreation Director the authority to waive facility rental fees for city-owned and operated facilities to nonprofit organizations that benefit the community. The policy includes a fee waiver application for organizations to complete along with their facility rental application to ensure equity and fairness in regards to fee waivers. The policy also includes a limit on how much city staff can waive in a year without approval from the city council. Lastly, the policy includes city staff presenting to the City Council on an annual basis on all of the fee waivers granted and the impact it has had.

The policy was presented to the City of Riverbank Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. The Advisory Committee approved the policy with a unanimous vote of 5-0.

The policy is now being prepared for city council review and approval.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact for the city council to approve this policy and procedures.

Waived facility rental fees will place a financial burden on the Parks and Recreation department as rental fees cover overhead costs related to the rental. In past fee waivers approved by the City Council, monies from the General Fund would be transferred to offset this burden. Additional funding has been requested from the department to be made available to dilute this burden.

STRATEGIC PLAN
According to the City’s strategic plan, a goal that is outlined is to ‘promote community partnership’. One strategy to accomplish this goal is to partner with local organizations to provide support to host their community events and fundraisers. These types of partnerships also fulfill the objectives outlined in this goal of ‘support volunteer groups and support community-driven multi-cultural events.’ Implementing this policy allowing city staff to waive fees would eliminate administrative challenges, potential delays, and for the need to have fee waiver items consistently on city council agendas for approval.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Fee Waiver Policy

3. Facility Fee Waiver Request Form

Page 1 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – 05/27/2025
CC Resolution 2025-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK

ADOPTING A FACILITY RENTAL FEE WAIVER POLICY FOR CITY-OWNED

FACILITIES

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the City of Riverbank receives a number of facility rental fee waiver requests each year from nonprofit organizations, community groups, and government partners; and
WHEREAS, the City of Riverbank currently does not have a policy enacted to waive facility rental fees, which creates administrative challenges and delays for both staff and applicants; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to streamline the process while maintaining transparency and accountability adopting a formal facility rental fee waiver policy that would authorize City Manager or the Parks and Recreation Director to waive rental fees; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Facility Rental Fee Waiver Policy outlines clear eligibility criteria, an application process, and documentation requirements to ensure consistency and fairness; and
WHEREAS, approval of this policy will require an annual budget allocation of $7,500 from the General Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby adopts the Facility Rental Fee Waiver Policy and authorizes the City Manager or the Parks and Recreation Director, or their designee, to approve or deny facility fee waiver requests based on the criteria established therein.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all fee waivers granted under this authority shall be documented and reported annually to the City Council for informational purposes.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of May, 2025; motioned by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of ______:

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 2 of 2 ends

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2025-
AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY OF RIVERBANK

PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT

FACILITY RENTAL FEE WAIVER POLICY
Effective Date: May 27, 2025
Approved By: Resolution 2025-
Department Responsible: Parks and Recreation
Next Review Date: May 27, 2028

1. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to establish a clear and consistent process for evaluating and approving facility rental fee waivers for City-owned parks and recreation facilities, while maintaining fiscal responsibility. This policy delegates discretionary authority to the City Manager or Parks and Recreation Director for approving waiver requests in alignment with the City’s mission, values, and community goals.

2. Authority
In accordance with Riverbank Municipal Code § 115.05, the city council may waive any and all permit and license fees for dances held by bona fide memorial, fraternal, charitable, or nonprofit organizations and associations. This policy would include any events hosted at any facility owned and operated by the City of Riverbank. The policy also authorizes the City Manager or Parks and Recreation Director to approve or deny fee waiver requests for facility rentals under the parameters established herein.

3. Scope
This policy applies to all rental facilities owned and operated by the City of Riverbank Parks and Recreation Department, including but not limited to:
- Scout Hall
- Community Center
- City parks and picnic shelters
- Athletic fields and courts
- Pools and aquatic facilities
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 2 of 4 ends

This policy does not apply to third-party operated venues or facilities not under the direct management of the Parks and Recreation Department.

4. Definitions
- Fee Waiver: A partial or full reduction of facility rental fees. - City-Sponsored Event: An event officially organized or co-sponsored by the City. - Co-Sponsored Event: An event or program that is collaboratively planned, promoted, and implemented by the City of Riverbank and an outside organization. - Nonprofit Organization: An organization recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(3), 501(c)(4), or equivalent.
- Community Benefit: Events or programs that serve the public interest and promote civic engagement, health, safety, education, or cultural enrichment.

5. Eligibility Criteria
The City Manager or the Parks and Recreation Director may waive facility rental fees if one or more of the following conditions are met:
- The event is co-sponsored by the City of Riverbank or serves a municipal purpose. - The applicant is a verified nonprofit organization hosting an event that is free and open to the public.
- The event directly benefits Riverbank residents or enhances community well-being. - The event is organized for youth, senior citizens, individuals with disabilities, or underserved populations.
- The event commemorates a recognized national or local holiday or observance.

6. Fee Waiver Limitations
- Fee waivers of city-owned recreational facilities include the following:
• The rental fee of the city-owned recreation facility. • Two site monitors to ensure that city, department, and facility policies are followed. • Day of table and chair set up.
- Fee waivers of city-owned recreational facilities do not include the following:
• Refundable Security Deposits
• Additional Staff
• Equipment Rentals
• Onsite Security if Alcohol is Present
• Cleaning Fees
• General Liability Insurance

Page 3 of 4 ends

- No cash donations or fundraising proceeds may be directed to individuals excluding student scholarships, or for-profit entities as a result of waived facility use. - The maximum value of facility rental fee waivers approved under this policy by the City Manager or Parks and Recreation Director shall not exceed $7,500.00 in total annually without City Council approval.
- Each organization may receive up to two (2) fee waivers per calendar year unless otherwise approved by the City Council.

7. Application and Review Process
A. Submission:
- All requests must be submitted in writing using the City of Riverbank Facility Fee Waiver Request Form at least 30 days in advance of the event.

B. Evaluation Criteria:
- The Parks and Recreation Director shall review requests based on:
i. Alignment with community benefit criteria
ii. Availability of facility and staff resources
iii. Demonstrated financial need, if applicable
iv. Past use history and conduct of the organization
C. Decision Notification:
- Applicants will be notified of the decision in writing within 14 business days of submission. Denied applicants may appeal by requesting City Council consideration.

8. Reporting and Transparency
The Parks and Recreation Director shall maintain a log of all approved fee waivers, including:
- Organization name
- Event description and date
- Facility used
- Amount waived
An annual summary report shall be submitted to the City Council each fiscal year for review.

9. Policy Review and Updates
This policy shall be reviewed every three years or as directed by the City Council.

Amendments must be approved by the City Council.

Page 4 of 4 ends

Approved By:

City Council of the City of Riverbank
Date: [Insert Date]
Attest:
_________________________
Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk
Prepared By:
_________________________
Michael Patton, Parks and Recreation Director
City of Riverbank
Facility Fee Waiver Request Form
Please complete this form in full and submit it to the Parks and Recreation Department at least 30 days prior to your event. Incomplete forms will not be considered.

Section 1: Applicant Information
Organization Name: ___________________________________________ Nonprofit Status (Yes/No): __________ EIN: _____________________ Contact Person: ________________________________________________ Phone Number: ________________________________________________ Email Address: ________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Section 2: Event Information
Event Name: __________________________________________________ Event Date(s): ________________________________________________ Event Time: From ___________ To ___________
Facility Requested: ____________________________________________ Estimated Attendance: _________________________________________ Is the event open to the public? (Yes/No): ________________________ Will there be an admission fee or fundraising? (Yes/No): ____________ Please describe your event and its purpose (attach additional pages if needed):
______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
ATTACHMENT 3
Section 3: Justification for Fee Waiver
Please explain how your event meets the eligibility criteria for a facility fee waiver.

Include information about how the event benefits the Riverbank community. ______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________
Section 4: Declaration and Signature
I certify that the information provided in this application is true and correct. I understand that submission of this form does not guarantee a waiver will be granted and that all other applicable rules, policies, and fees apply.

Signature: ______________________________________ Date: ________________ Print Name: ____________________________________
For Office Use Only
Date Received: ____________________________
Application Reviewed By: ____________________
Decision: [ ] Approved [ ] Denied
Fee Amount Waived: $________________________
Comments/Conditions:
________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Director Signature: ___________________________ Date: ________________

← All documents from this meeting