Riverside City Council
January 25, 2022

Final Environmental Impact Report

SCH#2020079023

prepared for
City of Riverside
Community Economic Development Department, Planning Division 3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, California 92522
Contact: Veronica Hernandez, Senior Planner

prepared by
Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc.
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C310
Ontario, CA 91764

November 2021

SYCAMORE HILLS DISTRIBUTION CENTER
,RVA

Final Environmental Impact Report

SCH#2020079023

prepared for
City of Riverside
Community Economic Development Department, Planning Division 3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, California 92522
Contact: Veronica Hernandez, Senior Planner

prepared by
Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc.
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C310
Ontario, CA 91764

November 2021

SYCAMORE HILLS DISTRIBUTION CENTER
___ RVA
City of Riverside Table of Contents
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR
i

1.0 Introduction ................................................................... ................................................ 1.0-1

1.1 Purpose of the EIR Process .............................................................................. 1.0-1

1.2 EIR Certification Process and Consideration of Project Approval ................ 1.0-1

1.3 Public Review Summary ................................................................................... 1.0-2

2.0 Responses to Comments ............................................................................................. 2.0-1

2.1 Environmental Review Process ........................................................................ 2.0-1

2.2 Organization of Comment Letters and Responses ......................................... 2.0-2

2.3 Comment Letters and Responses .................................................................... 2.0-3

2.4 References ..................................................................................................... 2.0-474

3.0 Revisions to the DEIR ................................................................................................... 3.0-1

3.1 Text Revisions to the Draft EIR ........................................................................ 3.0-1

3.2 Appendix Revisions to the Draft EIR and New Final EIR Appendix ............... 3.0-9

Appendices
Appendix C – Revised Air Quality Analysis
Appendix D – Revised Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report Appendix H – Revised Greenhouse Gas Analysis
Appendix M – Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Determination Letters Appendix N – Construction Health Risk Assessment
Appendix O – Floor Plans for Buildings A and B

RVA
City of Riverside Section 1.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Introduction

1.0-1

1.0 Introduction
The Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), as required pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15089 and 15132, includes the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) or a revision thereof, comments and recommendations received on the DEIR, a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the DEIR, and the responses of the lead agency, which is the City of Riverside (City) for this Project, to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is also included to ensure compliance during Project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15097).

1.1. Purpose of the EIR Process
This Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) is an informational document to evaluate the potential environmental i mpacts of the proposed Sycamore Hills Distribution Center Project (Project). The primary objectives of the EIR process under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are to inform decision-makers and the public about a project’s potentially significant environmental effects, identify feasible ways to minimize significant effects, and consider a reasonable range of alternatives to the project.

This Final EIR contains 1) The Draft EIR (incorporated by reference in accordance with S tate CEQA Guidelines Section 15150); 2) Errata, a revision of the DEIR, including minor changes that clarify or correct minor inaccuracies; 3) Comments received on the DEIR; 4) List of persons, public agencies, organizations that commented on the DEIR; and 5) Responses to significant environmental points raised in the review period. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City of Riverside must certify the EIR as complete and adequate prior to any potential approval of the project or a project alternative.

Revisions to the Draft EIR necessary in light of the comments received and responses provided, or necessary to amplify or clarify material in the Draft EIR, are included in the responses to comments as well as the Errata. Underlined text represents language that has been added to the Draft EIR; text with strikeout has been deleted from the Draft EIR. All revisions are then compiled in the order in which they would appear in the Draft EIR (by section and page number) in Section 3, Revisions to the Draft EIR, of this document. Page numbers cited in this section correspond to the page numbers of the Draft EIR. When mitigation measure language has been changed, it has been changed in the text on the stated Draft EIR page, the summary table (Draft EIR Table 1) in the Executive Summary of the Draft EIR, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). The Final EIR includes the responses to comments on the Draft EIR provided herein and the text of the Draft EIR, revised based on responses to comments and other information.

1.2. EIR Certification Process and Consideration of Project Approval In accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the procedures of the City of Riverside, the EIR must be certified as complete and adequate prior to any potential final action on the proposed project. Once the EIR is certified and all information considered, using its independent judgment, the City can choose to take no action, or to take action to go forward with the proposed project, make changes, or select an alternative to the proposed project. While the information in the EIR RVA
Section 1.0 City of Riverside
Introduction Sycamore Hills Distribution Center Project FEIR

1.0-2
does not constrain the C ity’s ultimate decision under its land use authority, the City must respond to each significant effect and mitigation measure identified in the EIR as required by CEQA by making findings supporting its decision.

1.3. Public Review Summary
The City circulated the DEIR for the Project for a 45-day public review period from June 8, 2021 through July 22, 2021. Notices of Completion and Availability of the DEIR were circulated to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and other interested parties on June 8, 2021.

General public Notice of Availability of the DEIR was also given by publication in The Press - Enterprise daily circulation newspaper on June 8, 2021. As required by Public Resources Code Section 21092.3, a copy of the public notice was posted with the Riverside County Clerk on June 8, 2021.

As prescribed by the State CEQA Guidelines Sections 21091 (d), the City of Riverside, as the lead agency, is required to 1) evaluate comments on significant environmental issues received during the 45-day public comment period, and may respond to late comments, from persons who have reviewed the Draft EIR; and 2) prepare written responses to comments. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15088). The Responses to Comments, along with the comment letters, are included in Section 2 of this FEIR. In accordance with the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, the City has provided a written response to each commenting public agency no less than 10 days prior to the proposed certification date.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-1

2.0 Responses to Comments
This Response to Comments (RTC) section provides responses to public and agency written comments received by the City of Riverside on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Sycamore Hills Distribution Center (P roject). The DEIR identifies the likely environmental consequences associated with development of the proposed Project and recommends mitigation measures to reduce potentially significant impacts. In addition to providing responses to public and agency comments received on the DEIR, this RTC document also revises the DEIR to clarify or amplify the existing analysis, as necessary, in response to those comments or to make clarifications to information presented in the DEIR.

2.1 Environmental Review Process
According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), lead agencies are required to consult with public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide the general public with an opportunity to comment on the DEIR.

On July 28, 2020, the City of Riverside circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a 30- day period to identify environmental issue areas potentially affected if the proposed project were to be implemented. As discussed in Section 2 .3 of the DEIR, the NOP was distributed to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, and individuals/parties considered likely to be interested in the proposed Project and its potential impacts. Comments received by the City of Riverside on the NOP and during the August 12, 2020, virtual EIR scoping meeting held by the City are summarized in Table 2.0-1 of the DEIR. These comments were considered during the preparation of the DEIR.

The DEIR was made available for public review on June 8, 2021 and was distributed to local and State responsible and trustee agencies. Copies of the Notice of Availability of the DEIR were mailed to a list of interested parties, groups, and public agencies, as well as property owners and occupants of nearby properties. The DEIR and an announcement of its availability were posted electronically on the City’s website. The Notice of Availability of the DEIR was also posted at the office of the Riverside County Clerk and with the State Clearinghouse. Due to the current COVID- 19 guidance from the California Department of Public Health, and the closures of governmental facilities during the public review period, copies of the DEIR were made available for public viewing at the following City facilities: (1) Riverside City Hall, Community & Economic Development Department, Planning Division, 3900 Main Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA 92522; and (2) Riverside Public Library, Orange Terrace Branch, 20010- B Orange Terrace Parkway, Riverside, CA 92508.

The 45-day CEQA public comment period began on June 8, 2021 and ended on July 22, 2021.

The City of Riverside received eleven (11) comment letters on the DEIR prior to the close of the public comment period. The City also received four (4) comment letters on the DEIR after the close of the public comment period. Copies of all written comments on the DEIR received are included in Section 2.3 of this document, as are responses to those comments.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-2

2.2 Organization of Comment Letters and Responses
This section presents a list of comment letters received on the DEIR and describes the organization of the letters and comments that are provided in Section 2.3, Comments and Responses, of this document. The letters are presented in the order in which the letters were received.

Each comment letter has been numbered sequentially and each separate issue raised by the commenter has been assigned a number. The responses to each comment identify first the number of the comment letter, and then the number assigned to each issue, as identified in the bracketing/numbering of each comment. For example, Response 1.1 indicates that the response is for the first issue raised in comment Letter 1.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-3
Table 2.2-1 – DE IR Comment Letters Received
Letter Number and Commenter Agency/Group/Organization/Individual Page Number

1. Kim Ellis, Airport Manager Riverside Municipal Airport 2.0-4

2. Daniel Zerda, Student Intern
County of Riverside Transportation and
Land Management Agency, Airport Land
Use Commission

2.0-9

3. Transmission Technical Services
Department SoCalGas 2.0-12

4. Jamie Nord, Cultural Resource
Technician San Manuel Band of Mission Indians 2.0-15

5. Mauricio Alvarez, Planning
Analyst Riverside Transit Agency 2.0-18

6. Diane Doesserich, Team
Manager, Environmental Planning
Section
The Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California 2.0-24

7. Board of Directors Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance 2.0-29

8. Adam Salcido Adam Salcido 2.0-73

9. Matt Hagemann and Paul E.

Rosenfeld
SWAPE on behalf of Golden State
Environmental Justice Alliance 2.0-76

10. Deborah de Chambeau,
Engineering Project Manager
Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District 2.0-399

11. Leonard Nunney Friends of Riverside’s Hills 2.0-408 Comment Letters Received After Close of the DEIR Comment Review Period

12. Robert Krieger, Branch Chief Risk
Reduction Branch California Air Resources Board 2.0-434

13. Steven Piepkorn Golden State Environmental Justice
Alliance 2.0-459

14. Lenora Mitchell Lenora Mitchell 2.0-467

15. Cindy Roth, President/CEO Riverside Chamber of Commerce 2.0-471

2.3 Comment Letters and Responses
Written responses to each comment letter received on the DEIR are provided in this section. All letters received on the DEIR are provided in their entirety, followed by responses to the comments contained in the letters.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-4
Comment Letter 1 – Ri verside Municipal Airport
Comment letter 1 commences on the next page.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-5

Sonya Hooker
From:

Sent
To:

Ellis, Kim <l<[email protected]>
Tuesday, June 8, 2021 9:22 AM
Hernandez; Veronica
Subject RE: CITY Of il.lVcRSIDE - NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT EIR- SYCAMORE HILLS DISTRIBUTION CENTER

1.1 {rhe Airport has no comment.

Kim Bli!>, A.A.E.

Airport Manager
G ty of Riverside
Riverside Municipal Airport
Main: (951J 35l-6l 13
Cell: (909) 261-1867
Frnm: Hemandez, Veronica <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 7, 20216:35 PM
To: Hernandez, Veronica <[email protected]>
Subject: CTTY Of RIVERSIDE - NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT Elil.- SYCAMORE HIILLS DISTRIBUTION CENTER Hello.

Attached please find the Notic e of Availabiily of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sycamote Hills Distrioution Center.

RVA
PROJECT LOCATION: The Project site is located on the north side of Alessandro Boutevard , east of Sanon Street and west of San Gorgonio Drive, in the City of Riverside. The Project site includes three parcels , ~e.ssor P01cel Numbers fAPNs) 263-060-022 , 263-060-024, and 263-060-026, totaling 48.64 gross acres.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of the developmen t of two warehouse buildings and associated improvements including parking. fire lanes. fencing and walls ~ncluding retaining walls), landscaping , and waf er quolity treatment areas. The Project proposes subd ividing the site into lwo numbered p arcels !Parcels l and 2) and three lettered parcels (Parcels A B. and C). Parcel l 1s proposed to be developed with Building A a 400.CCO square foot warehouse . and Parcel 2 with Building B. o 203, l OD squ01e foot warehouse . for a combined total of 603,100 square feet of warehouse. Both warehouse buadings me proposed for high cube transload shorMerm use. primarily for ihe sho.rt-term storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods, (and too lesser exlenl, mw materials ). usually on pallet loads or larger handling products prior to their d'istribvtio n to retoa locations or other warehouses.

A typical high cube warehouse hos a high level of on-site automatio n and logistics rnanagemen t. No refrigerat ion use is proposed.

Parcels A and B contai n the existing 11 .6"ac re Restricted Property ihat landlocks Parcel I. The proposed Project includes modifications to the Restricted Property to creote a driveway to connect Porcel I /Building A to Alessandro Boulevard . The Project proposes to expand the Restricted Property by a net

0.63-ac re, foro total acreage of 12.23 acres.

Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-6

Parc el C is proposed lo be develop ed with a trai lheod port ing lot totaling 1.18 acres . l o serve the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Pork. Improvemen ts include a parking lot, sidewolk . shode structure . bike rock. drinking fountain. fencing . ond a F11e Departmen t access gate . Parce l C is p roposed to be dedicated lo fhe City .

Implementation of the proposed Project w ill require the following d iscretionary approvals:
• Parcel Mop (P20-0025) - To subdivide 48.64 -acres into 5 parcels; • Minor Conditional Use Permit ( Pl 9-0626) - To permit on industria l building over 400.000 squore feet in size:
• Design Review (Pl 9-0627) - For the proposed site design and building e levations review ; • Vo rionces (r20 -0258) - l J To a low lhe installation of combina tion retaining/fr eesta nding walls w herein the rel,aining portion ranges from 6.4 to 7.6 feel in he ight where ,a maximum retaini ng portio n height of 4 feet is permitted by the Zoning Code . ond 2) To o ~ow combination retaining/freestanding walls with a combined height of 14.4 feet. where a maxi mum combi ned heigh t of 10 fee t is permitted by the Zoning Code;
• Grading Excep tion (P20-0282) - To allow the he ight of retaining walls not open lo pub lic view lo be up lo 11.5 feet. where the Grading Code a llow-1 o maximum height o f 6 feet; and • Environmental Impac t Report (P20-0024).

PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: The Draft EIR is availab le for public review and commen t begin ning Tuesday , June

8. 2021. and endi ng Thursday , July 22, 202 1. An e!ectronic copy of the Dra ft EIR is available for pubfic review on the City's web site: https ://rivemdeca .gov/cedd/p lanning/deve lopment-projects-anck:eqa­ documenfs . II unable to access the electron ic copy. please contac t Veronica Herna ndez, Senior Planner al (951 J 826-3965 or [email protected] .

Due to Cllrrent COVID-19 guidance from the Ca5fomia Departmen t of Public Hea lth. a nd the current fimited hours of government facilities . copies of the Draft EIR will be mode available for pubfic v iewing at the following City facilities: (1) ~ive rside Cify Hall, Commlln ity & Economic Developmenf Department.

Planning Division. 3900 Moin Stree l. Third floo r. Riverside. CA 92.522 from 9 AM to 4 PM Mondays . Tuesdoys .

Thursdays . a nd fridoys and from 10 AM to 4 PM on Wednesdays; and (2) Riverside Public Library, Orange Terroce Branch . 200 10-8 Orange Terrace P-arkway, Riverside. CA 92508 from 2 PM to 5 PM Tuesdays ond Thursdays a nd 11 AM lo 2 PM on Saturdays . Questions related lo Drott EIR availability shou ld be directed to the project conlact.

Responses lo this Draft EIR shou ld be sent to Vero nica Hernand ez. Senior Planne r, no la ter lhan 5:00 p.m. on ThutSdoy, July 22. 2.021 al the following address:

LEAD AGENCY:

City of Riverside
Community & Economic Developmen t Department
Pla nning Division
3900 Main Street. 3rd Floor
Riverside. California 92522
Attn : Veronica Hernande z. Senior Planner
(95 1) 826-3965
vhernandez@riversideca .gov
Should you h ave any questions rega rding this case . please do not hesita te lo contact m e.

Best.

Veronica Hernandez Senior Planner
951 .826.3965 vhemondez@rivers ide-co .gov
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-7

Cily of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Department
Pio nning Division
3900 Main Street ~ Floor RivetSide 92522
Our Collective Mission: Ensure the well-being of residents, employees, and visitors in the City of Riverside by limiting the spread of COVID- 19. Stay Home, Maintain Your Space , Cover Your Face.

Keep Riverside healthy: Wear a face covering , mainta in healthy diet and exercise, wash your hands, and get vaccinated. RiversideCAgov/COVID-19
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-8
Letter 1 – Ri verside Municipal Airport
Commenter: Kim Ellis
Date: June 8, 2021
Response 1.1:

The commenter states that the Riverside Municipal Airport has no comment.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-9
Comment Letter 2 – Count y of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency, Airport Land Use Commission
Comment letter 2 commences on the next page.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-10

Sonya Hooker
from:

Sent:

To:

Subject
Hi Veron ica,
~ D,miel < DZer,[email protected] >
Tuesday, June 8, 2021 10:12 AMI
Hernandez, Veronica
[Extemaij CITY OF RIVERSIDE - NOTICE OF AVAllASIUTY OF DRAFT EIR- SY•CAMORf HILLS DISTRIBUTION CENTER (ALUC Commffits)
Thank you for sending th e transmittal for the abo,ve referenced case. The project is located in Zone Cl of the

2.1 March Airport Influence Area. It is my understan ding t hat the· prnject does not propos e any legislative actions, and since t he City's Genera l Plan has been found consistent with the March Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, City Staff may p erform t he Airport Comp atibilit y review. Please let me know if you have any questions. -!Best Regards,
Daniel ~
student lntem
Transporta t ion and Land Manageme 111t Agency
County of Riverside
(951)955-0982
_Confidentiality Disclaimer
I This e_maU is con.tiMntial alld i.ntfflded solely for the use of di~ i.ndividw.J(s) to wllom it is a~s.ed. The idornntion oootaine<l in this mess~oe may b~ I
privile~ illld ccmli.dential and p!'OtfflEd from cllicloSlll'I! , If you al!'e not the autfulr's int~nd.edl recip~nt. be ad\i~ d that you ha-.-e received this email in ermr and that amy use, dissemi.n.Mx!D, foi-~ranfing, pnntiD!l", ti!' I
COJYi~ngof this: email is roictly prohibit!<!. Jf you bn-e recei\-eci this email in ermr please delete aD oopies, both electronx and pri.nte<I. and contact die· author iruruedia!efy,
County of Riverside California
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-11
Letter 2 – Count y of Riverside Transportation and Land Management Agency, Airport Land Use Commission
Commenter: Daniel Zerda
Date: June 8, 2021
Response 2.1:

The commenter indicates the project is in Zone C1 of the March Airport Influence Area (March Air Reserve Base), that the project does not propose any legislative actions, and since the City’s General Plan has been found consistent with the March Airport (March Air Reserve Base) Land Use Compatibility Plan, City Staff may perform the Airport Compatibility review. The commenter’s understanding and this information is consistent with the information contained in the DEIR, Sections 5.8 Hazards & Hazardous Materials, and 5.10 Land Use and Planning.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-12
Comment Letter 3 – So CalGas Transmission Technical Services Department Comment letter 3 commences on the next page.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-13

3.1 RVA
MsoCalGas
A ~ Sempra Energy u111r1y
June 8, 2021
Veronica Hernandez
City of Riverside
vhemandez@rivers ideca.gov
Subject:

DCF:

SYCAMORE HILLS OIST1RIBUTION CENT6R
1027-21NC
Transmission Technical
Services Departmer1t
~ ~ Ookd:dt, A""
Cl,at>,..<Ottl,. CA 91311
SC9314
The Transmission Department oi SoCalGas does not operate any facilities within your propo-s.ed improvem ent. However , the Distribution Department of SoCalGas may m aint ain and operate facilities with in your project scope .

To assure no confli ct with t he Distributton' s pipel'ine syst,em, please e-mail them at:

SCGSERegionRedland sUti lityRegue st@sempraut ilit ies.com Best Regards,
SoCalGas Transmission Technical Services
socalGamansm issionUtilir,[email protected]
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-14
Letter 3 – SoCalGas
Commenter: Transmission Technical Services Department
Date: June 8, 2021
Response 3.1:

The commenter states that while the Transmission Department of SoCalGas does not operate any facilities within the proposed Project, the Distribution Department of SoCalGas may maintain and operate facilities within the proposed Project’s scope.

The City will condition the Applicant to contact the Distribution Department of SoCalGas to ensure the Project is not in conflict with the Distribution’s pipeline system, pursuant to their request.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-15
Comment Letter 4 – Sa n Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Comment letter 4 commences on the next page.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-16

Sonya Hooker
From:

Sent
To:

Cc:

Jamie Nord <Jamie.Nord@sanmanuel-nsf\.gov>
Tuesday, June 8, 2021 4:51 PM
Hernandez, Veronica
Ryan ~
Subject [External] RE: Response to D@ft EIR, Sycamore Hill.s Distribution Center, Riverside, Riverside County, Calif.ornia
Dear Veronica Hernandez,
{
Thank you for contacting the San Manuel Band of Mission ln.dians (SMBMI} regardin.g the above-refere nced project.

SMBMI appreciates the opportun.ity to review the project documentation , whi ch was received by t he Cultural Resources

4.1 Management Department on June 7'", 2021. The proposed project is located outsi de of Serrano ancestral territory and, a:s such, SMBMI will not be request ing to receive consulting party status with the lead agency ,or to parti cipate in the scoping, development, or review of documents creat ed pursuant to legal and regulatory mandates.

Kind regards,
Jamie Nor-d

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICIAN
En-all: [email protected] .Gov
0 : (Q09} 864-SQ33 x50-3421
M: (909) 649-1186
26500 Conmunity Cente r 0.- Highland California 92346
~ ! ttW1Hill I ,~MANUl:L
Wl.O S0.'1 I HNO Qt~l t:ft C:PC,

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ON'LY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRJVIL.EGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER .APPL! CAB LIE LAW. If the reader of this mes.sage is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for deliveri!lgthe message to the intend ed recipient, you are hereby notified that any di.sseminat!ion or copy iflg of this communicat ion is strictly prohib ited. If you have received this electronic transmiss ion in error, please delete it from you r system without-copying it and notify the sender by reply e-mail so that the email address record can be corrected . Thank You RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-17
Letter 4 – San M anuel Band of Mission Indians
Commenter: Jamie Nord
Date: June 8, 2021
Response 4.1:

The commenter states that because the Project site is located outside of Serrano ancestral territory, the Tribe will not be requesting consultation with the City on this Project.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-18
Comment Letter 5 – Ri verside Transit Agency
Comment letter 5 commences on the next page.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-19

Hernandez Veronica
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject
Mauricio Alvarez <malva1ez@riYt>rsidelJansit.com>
Wednesday, July 14, 2.0.2.1 10-3 2 AM
Hemandez. Veronica
P.E: External RE: CITY OF RIVERSIDE - NOTICE Of AVAILABILITY OF ORAIT E.IR -SYCAMORE Hlll.S

DISTRIBUTION CENTER
Good Morning Veronica,
~
When I liJst received the plans for this proje ,:t last year, the recommendation wa$, if possible, to provide an ADA compl1anr bus slop 011 Alessandro, west of Vista Grande Dr. I don't know ii 1he recommenda1 ion was moved forward at

5.l lhe time . Looking at tile plans ag<lin, the rccommend;)tlon would ~till lb~ the samt- now. In addition, tl\ere should bi: M AOA pathway from the main entranc;e/street on Alessandro to the warehouse facility to ensure pedestrfans have a 5afe area lo walk.

I
Than k you for considering this comment.

Mauricio AlvarN , MBA
J>l;,nning An.ity.u
Riverside Tr.a-nslt Agency
p; 95t.S6S ,S260 I e ; OJAhoi1.11tDtlv~t,aidtl.r'-'n.:til o;,WJ, i'J.c.b:iilA.I E.it~ I I.t£1lttLI ltl~Wl.t..tlll
l825 TI11rd Street , Rl11erslde, CA 92507
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-20
Letter 5 – Ri verside Transit Agency
Commenter: Mauricio Alvarez
Date: July 14, 2021
Response 5.1:

The commenter indicates it is recommended that, if possible, to provide an ADA compliant bus stop on Alessandro, west of Vista Grande Drive. In addition, there should be an ADA pathway from the main entrance/street on Alessandro to the warehouse facility to ensure pedestrians have a safe area to walk. The City Planning Department staff had a discussion with the RTA commenter subsequent to receiving the comment for further clarification on the recommendations. The RTA commenter indicated that only an ADA -compliant sidewalk which would accommodate a future bus stop are being requested of the applicant to provide, not the actual bus stop. RTA will construct the actual bus stop improvements in the future.

In the DEIR, Section 5.12 Transportation, page 5.12- 50, it indicates “The Project is required to provide sidewalk with the capability for RTA to install an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant RTA bus stop bench and pole marker in the future along Alessandro Boulevard, near the Alessandro Boulevard/Vista Grande Drive intersection.” The sidewalk that will be installed is ADA compliant and the road improvements installed as part of the project will accommodate bus stop installation in the future by RTA. Therefore, the Project as designed, accommodates the RTA’s request.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-21
Comment Letter 6 – Th e Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Comment letter 6 commences on the next page.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-22

6.1 July 15, 2021
Tfff /lffT ROPOUTIIN W,HIR DfS TRJCJ
or SOUTHCII.N C..WFOII.NIA
Veronica Hernandez, Senior Planner
City ofRiverside
Community and Economic Development Department
Planning Division
3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor
ltiverside, California 92522
Dear Ms. Hemande:z:

Notice of A va:ilability of a Draft
Via Electronic Mail
Environmental Impact Report for the Sycamore Hills Distribution Center Proje£t The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) reviewed th.e Notice of Availability of the Draft En\·ironmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Sycamore Hills Distribution Center (Project). The proposed Project would construct two warehouse buildings, a trailhead parking lot, associated improvements including parking, ft.re lanes, fencing and walls, landscaping, and water quality treatment areas, and \\1ould extend Barton Street to access the Project in the city of Riverside. This letter contains Metropolitan 's comments to the proposed Project and DEIR as an affected re:,-ponsible public agency.

Metropolitan previously provided correspondence on the Project in August 2020 (copy attached) in re:,-ponse to the K otice of Preparation for the DEIR stating that the Project bad the potential to impact Metropolitan' s Box Springs Feeder and Perris Valley Pipeline ·waterlines, Henry Mills Water Treatment Plant, and associated fee-o,vned property. The attached exhibit provides an updated depiction of these facilities and fee property in relation to the Project. Due to the Project's proximity to these facilities and property we provided a copy ofMetropolitan's RGuidelines for Improvements and Construction Projects Proposed in the Area ofMetropolitan's Facilities and ltights-of-Way."
While we appreciate that our previous comments were noted and addressed in the DEIR, upon review of the document and the more detailed project depictions provided therein, including Figure 3.0-9, we determined that the Project would require the use of Metropolitan fee owned property on Barton Street Specifically, Metropolitan o\vns the portion of the street extending westerly of its centerline. Metropolitan acquired the property, assigned MWD Parcel 1610-1-1, by grant deed recorded as Document No. 87059 on August 29, 1966, and re-recorded as Docwnent No. 99077, on October 6, 1966 (see grant deed attached). As described in the DEIR, the Project would utilize Barton Street during construction and operation and would pave and extend the roadway north of its current temlinus to provide access to Parcels 2 and C.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-23

6.1 cont'd
RVA

THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNJA
Vero:nica HenLU1dez

July I 5, 2021
The use ofMetropolitan's fee-owned property to extend Barton Street \¥ill require the submittal of a land use application (see attached) for the granting of a public road easement or the issuance of an entry permit. Metropolitan will consider the FEIR to evaluate the applicant's request for a public road easement or entry permit However, Metropolitan's engineering and operations staff will analyze the project and construction documents as well as engineering reports to determine if the potential impacts :from the proposed use cannot be adequately mitigated to negate disruptions or interference with current and futw-e operational requirements. Therefore, the potential impacts associated with the use of Metropolitan' s foe 01.wed property on Barton Street should be analyzed and described in the FEIR. This discretionary action and the granting of pennanent real property rights will be carried out by Metropolitan's Board of Directors.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide input to your planning process, and we look forward to receiving future environmental documentation and design plans regarding this proposed Project If you have any questions, please contact Alex Marks at (213) 217-7629.

Very truly yours,
Diane ~
Dian.e~
Team Manager, Environmental Planning Section
Enclosures:
(I) Map of Metropolitan fee property and facilities in relation to the Project (2) Metropolitan Gt-ant Deed DOC 99077
(3) Metropolitan Land Use Application
(4) Metropolitan comment letter on the NOP for the Project, dated Al\:,oUst 17, 2020 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-24

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-25

RVA
'
t
t· j
( ,,;j\
.ujF
l!;11t<;:onl•d !It c.l:•• ~11qven ,;,£
THE Mrl"IWl'OLYI~ WATD DISTIUC-::

Of tOU'J'~ p.l,IPONIIA
Wh-ii ~corded I RAvrn co
THI 1UTIIOPOl..l'tA1i WA!'iil i>U't'llCT
Ol' SOt!l'Htll\Ji CAL tfOIINIA.

Poat Office J qx ~4tS3
Loa ' Arlselu, '.!:alifomb 90054
. '
Klil tax S~atl!!Mn~• to
Till!. M!TROPO!.J'rAlf Wil'D l>ISTllICl'
OP S0111'HAN CALt,01»tA
Po1c 0££1ce l!Olit. 54U3
Lo, Angdu, C&lt fornu
I
90054 J '✓//, J-1>
r . R s '° +,"'fff ·&"' -
GM>n' Ol!JP
r0it Va1\!<1blt __ con,Sdn•tion, ~Dfl I:. '!iAUTllllN1
IIHlL't ~Ii S'l'OtltMJU>t aho la\own a, 11.41:, t'. ~1°"; ~ 1 , SC.\('l,mttli.; ~ 'tM.U?Vlll ~. •,ho"­
I I
, . ..
iU
H tlarprat 1'. :!ltod:daTII, IIIIG &e'fllil'ld tltl• &I .lla'tGINt 'IN.ll~ ~ifl l llllflflft'Y Hl!Ml)II.IClt COLY'US&, &l ■o kruMI •• L JI, Col v t U•i JUOn'. ' cotvna l'-OWD,; OOR<mn' COLvtLLl! IWlll, MHI llJu.uH ~ . I COL.VJLLI!., JD.,. ebo 11:nawn H Willi- T. Colnli• .• .Jr . , bat-.b:, gran t to
I
TIU,'. l(!TRUPOLI'VJ!I VA.TD D1STllICT a, IIIOO'tQU · CJ,LIJ'ODU l I ' a public corpo·r ■ tl-. !
11\• tollow-tnlll dHcrlb•4 ru.1 proputy, Mninaft& ,· r•f~ to Iii l'lircel A, ·J n 'tha City ot lllv■ rd.cle, l.lQUnty of U!v•t•l<II•, SUte of C■.HIC<>r:tia } and ?Uc•l 1 1 ln lb• 00\inty cf ti,..e.1/'llli!I, Star■ of C&1.-t_lfo,:r1.• t
'
Thf' aouth- ■■.t: qwn:t.r · of the -.Ol'C~•e 4v•tt•:t of Section a. T~•hip 3 8011th, II.Ina• 4 w .. ,c, San Jemardillo · Ner!di~, . Sn ;th• City of Uverdde, Cowty of Uver•t.d •• ll'Uh of: Cali~ oni•, ■.ocordtn1 to tti• offtol•l plAt thet•of OIi file 111 th• offic• ct; the R■c:ord•r of ••td County.
·~ IO·
I
~ l
.i~
~'.,
I ;
ii
~ . ·• :a
j
'4
I '
Ii
)1 ,1
!~
"' ' '
" ';
j
i
,; J
. -~
..

J ,.~
1 ~
1 !
'Ii ...
l ·1
·i
,.
,,
' ,
It. r,
.f
'
·-
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-26

Lo cs l ~hi-~h 4, in1.l,u1ive, 1.11 lllo~k ~., nnd the GHL half of 1.ot.11 3 and 4 ln 8loclc 4, of Allaa an~ro Trac t , ln the County O•f Ri ' rside, State of California, H aht>wit on IMP recorded in ~k 6, page tl of Mapa 1n t he offic&lof ~•id Recol:'der,
EX
line 40 fHt
Sect1011 8, 11
recorded J 1,m
p1111e 506 of
T thnt portio n of 1111id l•nd lying ~outhul)· of o
orth of and pardla.i with the 11=t b lina of ■ 'tid
~e•c?ibcd In de~ to th• <:oun~y of ~tveraid••
20, 19S6 u Inet~t fkl. t.1.937, hi !look l<J:l,(),
ficfDl llecorda of ■ aid County.

Dnt~d: ,__·_·~-·-· ._ __ .. _,,_, ___ _
i•
' I
,!,
l
' I
I I I
4 r: 1
I
I
J
I
l
I.

I
I
rf
11 JIJ
~ l: •
' I'
l
I
I r
I I .'
• I
' I
j
,I,
, I ,
, I
I' ·I
I I
I
i
111
I , , • ,~
• I
: f
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-27

RVA
State of P1<1111~ylvania)
) !IS .

Co-. .mty of L itcicrn.ianna )
. /,.f ...,__ .
y r On thi& ~-""/...._/'l"" "'tz;,,,q----• 1'966 • he{orC' ~~ ✓.:.¼'1: Rx£,,~ , • ~Iry l'uhllc in and f or
•~n ty ,md Common'!ole11lt h, ,;,.eraona lly ■p·pe&re.d i<. H. Col vi i 1 .. ~nd w, 11. SLod.dard ., person a lly known to me to ,be u,e PftT•on11 Att omeyB - !n-·Fa ct of and fo r Ca=l ln,t H, frau tvein, l!mi l y Trautwein S':ot1dard , Arch u· t . Schve .i:i:e r . Ka.qaTet T rautv eln Stoddar d , Jou ie Colv1 1 le P·owel,. Dorothy Co\vUl.a Dan11, ~ td WiJHlll!I , :fb-• ColvU l o , Jr. , 110d <1cknowl-4ged 1 r. 11H1 t h•t K: H.

Colvt Ue J1ub aoribcd t he nuu,, o f Caro lino lt, '.r~11;,Jtvdn . l!lai l y Trautvein Stoddard, Archer l. Schweir-• r, Karg■ i:-• t' Tr.aunoeln I
Willie .111 T'homBs Co lville, Jr, thereto as princi J>ijls, and rhe lr awn names as Attomey s•ln-P act for each and el 1 or sat..d prir.cl p11la .-ind g rantora,
W'lTii!Sfi 11.y h&nd lll.,d of'f l Cial aeal th ■. d~~• .tnd yelir in thia , cert i f icn te first a bove writt en,
C.9.eAL)
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-28

l
! ' I
I
l
I
l Stal: •::! of l' enn,11yl:,11nia)
• ) BB .

Col.ll'lt)' o.f L11ckawJ1,nn")
' CaurU~y at1d ~•dtl\, per1ouUJ •1,1pc,1J.·r-~<J l!Cctmt.th litnd ·rick Colvi.!1.le ; individu ally, kn.own to - to be =he perMlft v lroae name. t !Ii subscrf bed t.o t he wt th:ln :ln ,.·t mmeut and a;,i\mowl edged to m~ th.s t he execut ec t he 1llil!le. 11\f W?flfESS 1nllD!Or • 'I have h.u9UD 1:0 H t my hand and ' ; affixed my o'E'ficial eee1 l:h-e d~y and y"r in thi■ ,cer-t iU.e•te • fLrtt a bov e ~rit t liffl<,
I .

I • .
i . ..
r
i
~
r
l
I
f
RVA
.
. l
' .. I
' I
I
I ·
~
I I 1:

I j
I
r·
..

J • I I
I
• I
I l
;• J -J '
J
I
\
I j
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-29
r
I
I I
1-,1
I
·: . 71 ..
~ \
' '
I i
t i ,,
'.l'hl.a (' t-o clil"tlty that th• :l.nhNlt ln rea l PNIPV'tf conveif91 by tM,~ deed 4at.d _ M&h 6 ,, l!ffi , = _ :!,NII CuOJAliJ•I H. Tg:-.u.tw.11,D. ot tl
t o 'l'be Met:ropol 1.t an Water· Dht~1ct or t'lou.thor!'l Cll:1,tor1'1 a, . f, p-;ib11o oo,z,:il"r&Hon. 1a hert1 by ac-oeptl·d b,- th• ·Wldt:r.t :l.gnld ott1 ,oer on °O((halr ur tl ,t1 lki.._r,e.l ot · D1r-e·otoH or "41.d J>htr1.ot pur1u:nt t o auttaor 1t)" cc,nf, ,:r-r.~ br Resoluticm 6615 or HU Board a<1.0p.udl on H.oV6lfltler 17, 1·?64• .and the gr.ante. 1H>n■ en,t■ to re<Joi-d.at1on ·tbart ol' \)y iU duly &\l\1nozobcid ott:lo.e:r.

Dtlte 'i --IJIAJDSi U., 196§
i
'
•
I
I
I
f
'
ll
I'
I
1,
I
' I ~
I
,I'
I 1
j
I·
f
I ~
fl
'1
l
i 1·
i
I
d I I i I
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-30

~ - - -------
I'
I t •
l
I i {
r
'
' j
t
~
I.
~
'
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-31

RVA
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRl:CT OF SOUTHERN CALIIFORNIA
Real Pro1perty Group I 213-217-7750
APPLICATION for USE of REAL PROP ERTY
Please complete all sections below.

Incomplete ,applications will result in delayed processing and responses.

Complete applications do not guarantee approva l.

App licant l'nformat ion
Company or Organiz at ion (if appl icable)
Applicant Name :

Street add ress
City
Offioe Phone
!Location of Property (Regu iredt
IRe questTy pe:I • I
(M\vD 9,;[l mali:e fmal determmation. of agreemem cype) Email! address
.Stre et address line 2
State
Cell Phone
Zip
Address or Locallion (include nea rest cross streets if address is unavailable ) City County Zip
Assess or Pa rce l Numbel(s)
IPro1posed Use Descriptio n Hf not a pplicab'l'e, ma rk wit h ·"n/ a") !Property Use Type Durat ion
IProje-ct St a rt Date P,roject End Date
,-------------------,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-32

Desciript io111 of pm posed const ruction, on-site activities, -or improvements:
lls tempo r ary staging or const ruction area required'? D ¥es □ No W ill security be provided for .st aging, constructio n or storcage purposes.? Are vehicles and equipment r equired? 0 Yes D No
lProject involves t he following:
(Check a11 that apply)
D Eingineering plancS
0 Soil environmental st,udies
D CEQA com plia11ce documentatio n
D Oth er
If other, please explain below:

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-33

E-mail completed form and applicable document s to:

Rea lE stateSt>ITices@ mwclll2o .com
FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY:

Metropolitan Parcel Number(s): Request Type:

Use: Metropolitan Facilit y:
___ l....:._J
Specific Use: \VSO Region:

Pipeline (if appli cable): Metr opolitan Station Number( s) RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-34

THf MffROPOHTAN WATfR. DISTRK;I'
OT .~OUTltEIIN CALlfDflNIA
August 17, 1020
Veronica Hema:nde-.z. Senior Planner
Ci:ty of River side
Community and Economic Development Depar1ment
Plauning Division
3900 Main Street 3id floor
Ri\'er .,;ide, California 92522
De.ar Ms. Hernandez ~
Review of the Sycamore Hills Distribu tion Center
Pro1ec-t Notic-e of Preparation for Environmental Impac-t Report \"IA £1\,-L.-\IL
The Metropolitan Water Distric-t of Southern California (Metrop olitan ) bas reviewed the Notic e of Preparation for the Sycamo,re Hills Distribution Center Project (Project) . Toe proposed Project to develop two warehouse buildings and associated improvements including parking . fue laue1;, fencing and wall.-;. land scaping , and water quality treatment areas is located in Riverside County in the City ofRi.verside. The City of Riverside will be the lead agency for the propo sed Project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City ofRiverside determined that an Environmenta l Impact Report (EIR) would be the most appropriate level of en\•u-cnmental document under CEQA to address potentiall y significant impacts.

Metropolit.m is a public agency and regi onal water whole'>aler. It is comprised of26 member public agencies serving approximate! y 19 mil.lion people in portions ofsi.,: countie s in Southern Califomi.a , including Rivers ide County. Metrop olitan 's missio n is to provi de its 5.200 square mile sei-v.ice area with adequate and reliable ~upphe s ofhigh-qua.l.it y water to meet pre sent au.d future needs in an environmentally and economic-ally respon sible way. This letter contains Metropolitan • s response to the Notice of Preparat ion for the Project as a potentiall y affected publi c agency.

Metropolitan owns prnpert y and owns and operates facilities on and adjacent to the site of the proposed action. As shown on the attached map (Exhibit A), Metropolitan 's fee-o,vned propert y the Box Springs Feeder , and !'vtill's Treatment Plant, hereafter refer.red to as the "Propert y," are respec-tively located to the north, and west of the propo sed Project. Perri s Valley Pipeline is along the boundary of the south s.ide of the proposed Project Site beneath East Alessandro Blvd_ Metropolitan is concerned with the potential .impacts to its Propert y, the pipeline and associated facilitie s resulting from future ei-.ca-..-ation.. construction. installation ofutiliti.es or any RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-35

RVA
THE UETROPOUTAN WATER DISTRICT OF sournERN CAUFORNIA
V eronic.a Hernan d ez

August 17, 2020
developmen t that may occur as a result of the proposed Project activitie s. Metropolitan must be allowed to maintain its rights -of-way and require '> unob stmcted acces s to it,s facilitie s in order to maintain and repair its system_ Metropolitan will not pemlit activities that could subject the pipeline to excessive vehicle , impact or vibrat ory loads .

Please note that Metropolitan does not allow any structures v;'ithin i.ts Prope 11y Of easement.

Development associated with the propo sed Project must not restrict any ofMetrnpol itan's day-to­ day operat ions and/o:r acce.ss to its facilities . Detailed p:rints of drawing s of Metropolitan 's pipelines and rights -of-way may be obtained by emailing Metropolitan 's Substmcmre s Information Line at Engineering;substructure s@mwdh2o .oom Of calling at (2 13) 2 17-7663 . To assist in preparing plans tha t ace compatib le with Metropolitan 's facilitie s, easements and prope11ies, we have enclo sed a copy of the "Guidelines for Impro vements and Constmction P:rojects Proposed in the Area ofMetropolitan 's Fac ilities and Rights -of-Way". Please note that alt submi tted designs o r plans must cle.a:rly identify Metropoli tan's facilitie s and 11ght-s--0f-way. In orde.r to avoid potential conflic ts with Melropolitan 's facilities and rights-of-v.,ay, Metropolitan requir es that detailed design plans for any activities within the \ric-inify of our facilitie s. Propeiiy or rights -of way be submitted p1':ior to conslruction for re\liew and written appro val Approval of the propo sed Project where it could impact Metropolitan 's Property :shoul d be contingent on Met:ropolitan 's approval of design plans for the proposed Project.

We appreciate the opportuni ty to provide input to your planning p:rocess and we took fonva:rd to rece iving future environmental. documentation and design plans regarding this propo~ P:roject.

If you have any question s, please contac t Tania ~fat (213) 21 7-568 7.

Ve:ry trol y you.rs,
D~ v~~
Diane Doesseric h
Interim Team Manage:r, Environmental Planning Section
DD:w
SharePoim\Cityo:IRi"l.-erside _ SycamoraHilli _ E.xtemal Raiew Enclo sures:
(]) Exhibit A: Map of Inland feeder and the SR-60 World Logist ics Center Parkway Interchange Project
(2) Guidelines for Imprnvements and Construction Projects P:roposed in the Area ofMetropoli tan's Facili ties and Rights-of-Way
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-36

~ ,.
~ ~ .Ill.LEY ~ ~--t--
Moreno Valley
~ MWOFee
Exhibit A
~ : ert:i lslPbe'.:ed'fl'~ ~~tnJ. l ~ ?Ut~l!le ~ ea,":il - ~be IIOOi !'z<n;.._ ,,,_,," l>,ii,e - No•- ol
,o:u,,ey l> - '11~
~ Hill$ NOP • ?rtjec! Location and Vatfy ·"'--=::::;::i(l::--"""-=::;::"""---111111!'~@ RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-37

RVA
Guidelines for
,Improvemen ts and Construction Projects Proposed
in the Area of
Metropo litan' s Facilit ies and Rights-of -Way
July 2018
Prepa.ced By:

The Metropolitan Water Distric.t of Southern California Substructures Team, Engineering Services
700 North Alameda. Street
Los Angeles , California 90012
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-38

The Merropolizan Wal!Y Oiscric: .of Souzhem ,01rifomia IMPROVEMENTS AHO COHSlRUCTION GUIDELINES Copyright C 2018 by The ~i!an Water Di5md of SO!ihem ~ - Additional Copies: To obtain a copy of lhis ooarnent , 1J:iease oontac1 the Engiteering Ser.rices Grol.4). Substrwtures Team.

Disclaimer
Metropol itan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the substructure information herein provided .

The user assumes responsibility for verifying substructure .loc.ations before excavating and assumes all liability for damage to Metropo lita.n's facilities as a resuft of such excavoti'on. Addlti'onallr, the user is cautioned to conduct suNeys and other field investigations as deemed prudent, to ass.ure that project plans are correct The appropriate representative from Metropoman must .be contacted at least two working days, before any work activity in proximity to Metropo/ltan 's facilities .

It genera/Ty takes 30 days to review project plans and provide written responses , Metropolitan reserves the right to modify requirements based on case-specific issues and regul atory deve./opments.

P!JHIJCITN).'IH ISTORr:
brftiDJ RR!ro;11 Jiizy20/8
Issue Da::e: July 2018
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-39

The rWerropolil3!1· Water Disrricr of Soud!em QJifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONS1RUC110N GUIDELINES Table of Conte nts

1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION _ -···--···----···-···--···-•· ····-····· -··· -···-····-·-····-···-•······. ··-······ _ . 1

1.1 Introduction····························-····························-························································ 1

1.2 Submittal and Review o f Project Plans/Utilities and Maps ............................................ 1

1.3 Identification of Metropolitan's Facilities and Rights-of-Way ................................. ........ 3

2.0 General Requirements .................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Vehicula r Access -····---··-········-··-·-··-·---····-······-····-················-······-····························-··· 3

2.2 F,ences_·-·----·-·--·-··---·-······-····-······-·----·-·-·--------·······-·········--·-·-·-··-·-·-··-·-·-···················---- 3

2.3 Driveways and Ramps ·····-·-·---····-·-·-····-·····························-········-·······························-3

2.4 Walks, Bike Paths, and Trails ...................................................................................... 3

2.5 Clear Zones ................................................................................................................. 4

2.6 Slopes .......................................................................................................................... 4

2.7 Structu res ····-····-·-····-····-··••-·············-······-··-······•·-···········-··························••·••··-· ......... 4

2.8 Protection of Metropolitan Facilities ·--· ................. -·-··-·-··-·-·-····-·-........... ··········--· __ -·--·. __ 4

2.9 Potholing of Metropolitan Pipelines .............................................................................. 4

2.10 Jacked casings or Tunnels .......................................................................................... 4

3.0 Landscaping .................................................................................................................... 5

3.1 P lans ............................................................................................................................. ·5

3.2 Drought-Tolerant Native and California Friendly Plants ................................................ 5

3.3 Trees ........................................................................................................................... 5

3.4 Other Vegetation.·-·-·· .. __ -··-·--· __ _ ._ .... -···--·-··-·-·· ....... ··-····-····-·-····-·-·-_ ........ -··-······-_-··_·-.. __ _ 6

3.5 Irrigation ....................................................................................................................... 6

3.6 Metropolitan Vehicular Access __ ·····-·---·······-··-······---··-····-·-·-··---·-·-·····-···········----·----·-···-6

4.0 General Utillties ···············-······----·-·-··-···--········································-······················--·-·-···· 6

4.1 Utility Structures ................... -·-····························· .. ···················-······ .. ······ .. ·········-········ 6

4. 2 Utility Crossings ........................................................................................................... 6

4.3 Longitudinal Utilities ..................................................................................................... 7

4.4 Underground Electrical Lines ···-·-·····-···············-··-···-·--·······-···-··-······-······-······-·-······-·-·· 7

4.5 Fiber Optic Lines ................................... ·-····································································· 7

4.6 Overhead Electrical and Telephone Lines_···············•···························-·····•· ·····-····--··· 7

4.7 Sewage Disposal Systems ........... ·-········-····································································· 7

4.8 Underground Tanks ..................................................................................................... 8

5.0 Specific Utilities: Non-Potable Utility Pipelines ................................................................. 8

6.0 Cathodic Protection/Electrolysis Test Stations ................................................................. 8

6.1 Metropo litan cathodic Protection ·······································································-········· 8

6.2 Review of Cathodic Protection Systems .......... ................................................ ...... ··-8

7.0 Drainage ............................................ ·-····-·-······-······························································ 9

7.1 Drainage Changes Affecting Metropolitan Rights-of-Way ............................................. 9

7.2 Metropolitan's Blowoff and Pumpwelll Structures ........................ ·-·······························-9

8.0 Grading and Settlement.. .................................................................................................. 9 ls.sue Da~e: J uly 2018
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-40

The frlprropo/ilan Water Oi51ricr of Souihem Ca!ifomia IMP,RO\IEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents

8.1 Changes in Cover over Metropolitan Pipelines ............................................................. 9

8.2 Settl'ement ..... .............................................................................................................. 9

9.0 Construction Equ ipment .................................................................................. .............. . 10

9. t Review ,of Propose<l Equipment .. ............................................................................... 1 O

9.2 Equipment RestJictions ............................................................................................... 10

9.3 Vibratory Compaction Equipment... ............................................................................. 10

9.4 Equipment Descriptions .............................................................................................. 10

10.0 Excavations Close to Metropolitan Fa cilities ................................................................... 11

10.1 Shoring Design Submittal. ........................................................................................... 11

10.2 Shoring Des ign Requirements .... ............ .................................................................. 11

11.0 Support of Metropolitan Facilities .... .... ..... .................................................. .................... 11

11.1 Support Design Submittal ............................ ............................................................... 11

11.2 Support Design Requiremen ts .................................................................................... 11

12.0 Backfill ............................................................................................................................ 12

12.1 Metropolitan Pipeline Not Supported ...................................................................... ..... 12

12.2 Metropolitan Pipeline Partially Exposed .................................... .................................. 12

12.3 Metropolitan Out and Cover Conduit on Colorado River Aqued'uct (CRA) ................... 12

13.0 Piles ............................................................................................................................... 13

13.1 Impacts on Metropolitan Pipelines ........................................................................... ... 13

13.2 Permanent CasH n-p1ace Piles .................................................................................... 13

14.0 Protective Slabs for Road Crossings Over Metropolitan Pipelines .................................. 13

15.0 Blasting ................................................................................................. ......................... 13

16.0 Metropolitan Plan Review Costs, Construction Costs and Bming .................................... 14

16.1 Plan Review Costs .................................. ................................................................. ... 14

16.2 Cost of Modification of Facmties Performed by Metropolitan .......... ............ ................. 14

16.3 Final Bflling ................................................................................................................. 14

17.0 St reet Vacations and Reservation -of Easemen ts for Metropolitan .................................. 14

18.0 Metropolitan Land Use Guidelines .................................................................................. 14

19.0 Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations ................ .............. .................. 15

20.0 Paramount Rights / Metropolitan's Rights within Existing Rights-of-Way ........................ 17

21.0 Disclaimer and Information Accurac y ............................................................................ 17 lssu:e D a:e-: July 2018
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-41

RVA
The· Met:ropoliran Water Di5trict of S-Oumem California IMPRO\IEMENTS AND CONS1RUCTION GUIDELINES Table of Contents
Table 1: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separation between Metropolitan's Pipe~ne1 and Sanitary Sewer or Hazardous Fluid P,ipeline3 •..•. .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. ..•.•••••.. •. .•... .. .. ... 18 Table 2.: General Guidelines for Pipeline "Separation f>etween Metropolitan's Pipeline1 and Storm Drain and/or Recycl'ed Water2 ........................................................................ 19 Table 3: General Guidelines for Pipeline "Separatio n1 between Metropolitan·s Pipeline and Recycled Wate.-V lrrigationsm , ................................................................................. 20 Figure 1: MSHTO H-20 Loading .............................................................................................. 21 Figure 2: Drawing SK- 1 ...................................................... ......................................... ........... 22 Issue Da:e: J\J ly 2018
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-42

The Merropolhan Waier Dismcz of Souzhem carifomia IM:PROVEM:ENJS ANO COHSTRUCllON GUIDELINES This page is intentiona lly lbl'ank.

Issue Da:e: July 2018
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-43

RVA
The Me1TOpOlh:an Water Oiscrici of Soudi,em Carifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

1.0 GENERAL INFORMAT ION
Note: Underground Serv ice Allert at 811 must be notified at least two working days before excavat ing in proximity to Metropolitan 's facilit ies.

1.1 Introduct ion

1.2 These guidelines provide mImmum ,design and construction requirements for any utaities, facilities, developments, and improvements, or any other projects -or activities, proposed tn or near Metropolitan Waler Distriict of Southern California (Metropolitan) facilities and rights-of-way. Additional conditions and stipulations may also be required depending on project and site specific conditions_ Any adverse impacts to Metropolitan's conveyance system, as detem1ined by Metropolitan, will need t o be mitigated to its sat~faction.

All improvements and activities must be designed so as to allow for removal or re'location at builder or developer expense, as set forth in the paramount rights provisions of Section 20.0. Metropolitan shall not be responsible for repair or r,eplacement of improvements, !landscaping or vegetation in the event Metropolitan exercises its paramount rig'hts powers.

Subm ittal and Review of Project PlansfUtilities and Maps Metropolitan requires project plans/utilities be submitted fm all proposed activities lhat may impact Metropolitan's facilities or rights-of-way_ Project plans shall ind ude copies of all pertinent utilities, sewer line, storm drain, street improvement, grading, site development, landscaping, irrigation and other plans, all tract and parcel maps, and all necessary state and federal environmental documentation. Metropolitan will review the project pfans and provide written approval, as it pertains to Metropolitan's facilities and rights-of-way. Written approval from Metropolitan must be obtained, prior to the start of any activity or construction in the area of Metropolitan's facilities or rights-of-way. Once complete proj,ect plans and s upporting documents a re submitted to Metropolitan, it generally takes 30 days to review and to prepare a detailed !Mitten response. Complex engineering plans that have the potential for significant impacts on Metropolitan's facilities or rights-of-way may require a longer review time.

Project plans, maps, or any other information should be submitted to Metropolitan's Substructures Team at the following mailing address:

Attn : Substrnctures Team
The Metropo litan Water District of Southem Californi a 700 North Alameda St.

Los Angeles , CA 90012
General Mail ing Address: P.O. Box 54153
Los Ange les, CA 90054~015-3
Emai I: EngineeringSubstructures@mwdl:l2o .com
Issue Oti~ec July 2018 Page I of22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-44

The Merropoliran WiILW" Oi&Iric.r of Socnnem eariforma IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCJION GUIDELINES For additional information, or to request prints of detl fled drawings for Metropolitan's facilities and rights-of-way, please contact Metropolitan's Substructures Team at 213- 217-7663 or [email protected].

Issue Oa:e: July 2018 Page 2of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-45

RVA
The Merropoli.an W;ill!I" Disnici of Soumem CafifofflQ IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1!.3 Identification of Metropolit an's Facilities and Rights-Of-Way Metropolitan's facmties and rights-of-way must be fully shown and identified as Metropolitan's, with official recording data, on the following:

A. AJI a,pplicable plans
B. AJI a,pplicabre tract and parcel ma,ps
Metropolitan's rights-of-ways and existing survey monuments must be tled dimensionally to the tract or parcel boundairies. Metropolitan's Records of Survey must be referenced on the tract and parcel maps with the appropriate Book and Page.

2.0 General Requiirements

2.1 Vehi cula r A ccess
Metropolitan must have vehicular acoess along its rights-of-way at all times for routine inspection, patrolling, operations, and maintenance of its facilities and constructiorn activities. All proposed improvements and activities must b e designed so as to accommodate such vehicular acoess.

2.2 Fences
Fences irnstalled across Metropolitan's rights-of-way must include a HHoot-wide gate to accommodate vehicular access by Metropolitan. Additional!y, gates may be required at other specified locations to prevent unauthorized entry into Metropolitan's rights-of-way.

All gates must accommodate a Metropotitan lock or Knox-Box with override switch to allow Metropolitan unrestricted! access There should be a minimum 20-foot setback for gates from the street at the driveway approach. The setbad< is necessary to allow Metropolitan vehides to safely pull off the road prior to opening the gate.

2.3 Driveways and Ramps
Construction of 1·6-foot-wide commerciaHype driveway approaches is required on both sides of all streets that cross Metropolitan's rights-of-way_ Acoess ramps, if necessary, must be a minimum of 16 feet wide.

There should be a minimum 20-foot setback for gates from the street at the driveway approach. Grades of ramps and access roads must not exc-eed 10 percent; if the slope of an access ramp or road must exceed 10 percent due to topography, then the ramp or road must be paved.

2.4 Walks. Bike Paths. and Trails
All walkways, bike paths, and trails a long Metropolitan's rights-of-way must be a minimum 12-foot vlide and have a 50-foot or greater radius on all horizontal! curves if also used as Metropolitan's access roads. Metropolitan's access routes, induding all walks and drainage facilities crossing the access routes, must be constructed to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) H-20 loading standards (see Figure 1 ). Additional requirements will be placed on equestriarn trails to protect the water quality of Metropolitan's pipelines and facilities.

Issue Oa:e; July 2018 Page3of22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-46

The Meaopolil:an Water District of &umem California IMf>ROVEMENTS AND CONS TRUCTlON GUIDELINES

2.5 Cllear Zones
A 20-foot-wide clear zone is requtred to be maintained around Metropolitan's manholes and other aoov~round facilities to accommodate vehicular access and maintena nce.

The clear zone should slope away from Metropolitan's facilities on a grade not to exceed 2 percent

2.6 Slopes
Cut or filll slopes proposed within Metropolitan 's rights-of-way must not exceed 1 O percent The proposed grade must not worsen the existing condition. Thf,s restriction is required to facilitate Metropolitan use of construction and maintenance equipment and aHow uninhibited access to above-ground and below"1iround facilities .

2.7 Struct ur,es

2.8 2.9
Construction of structures of any type is not allowed within the limits of Metropolitan's rights-o f-way to avoid interference with the operation and maintenan ce of Metropolitan 's facflities and possible construction of future facilities.

Footings and roof eaves of any proposed buildings adjacent to Metropolitan 's nights-of­ way must meet the follow.ing criteria:

A. Footings and roof eaves must not encroach onto Metropolitan's rights--0f-way.

B. Footings must not impose any additional loading on Metropolitan's facilities.

C. Roof eav,es must not overhang onto Metropolitan's rights-of-way.

Detailed pl,ans of footings and roof eaves adjacent to Metropolitan 's ri.ghts-of-way must be submitted for Metropolitan 's review and wntten approval, as pertains to Metropolitan·s facflities.

Prote ctiion of Metropolitan Facilities
Metropolitan facmties within its rtghts-of-way, including pipelines, structures, manholes, survey monuments, etc., must be protected from damag e by t he project proponent or property owner, at no expense to Metropolitan. The exact location , description and method of protection must be shown on the project plans.

Pot holing o f Metropo litan Pipe'lines
Metropolitan 's pipelines must be potholed in advance, if the vertical clearance between a proposed utility and Metropolitan 's pjpeline is indicated to be 4 feet or less. A Metropolitan representative must be pr:esent during the potholing, operation and wrn ass ist in locating the pipeline. Notrce ~ required, a minimum of three work,ing days, prior to any pothoTing activity.

2.10 Jacked Casings or Tunnels
A. General Requirements
utility crossings installed by jacking, or in a jacked casing or tunnel under/over a Metropolitan pipeline, must have at least 3 feet of vertical clearance between the outside diameter of the p ipelines and the jacked pipe, casing, or tunnel. The actual Issue Date: July 2018 Page 4of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-47

RVA
The lftletropolnan Ware,-Dimer of S-Oumem CaJifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GIJIOEUNES cover over Metropolitan's p ipeline shall be determined by potl1.oltng, under Metropolitan's supeivision.
utilities installed in a jacked casing, or tunnell must have the annular space between the utility and the jacked casing or tunnel filled with grout Provisions must be made for grouting any voids around the exterior of the jacked pipe, casing, or tunnel.

8. Jacking or Tunneling Procedures
Detailed jacking, tunneling, or directional boring procedrn;es must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. The p rocedures must cover all aspects of operation, incl'uding, but not limited to, dewatering, ground control, alignment control, and grouting pressure. The submittal must also inctude procedures to be iused to control sloughing, running, or wet ground, if encountered. A m inimum 10-foot dearance must be maintained between the face of the tunneling or r,eceiving pits and outside edges of Metropolilan's facility.

C. Shoring
Detailed drawings of shming for jacking or receIvmg p its must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and writtenr-approval. (See Section 10 for shoring requirements).

D. Temporary Support
Temporary support of Metropolrtan's pipelines may be required when a utility ,crosses under a Metropolitan pipeline and is installed by means of an open trench. Plans for temporary support must be reviewed and a,pproved iin writing by Metropolitan. (See Section 11, Supports of Metropolitan Facilities).

3.0 Landscap ing

3.1 Plans

3.2 All landscape plans must show the location and limits of Metropolitan's right-Of-way and the location and s ize of Metropontan's pipeline and related facilities therein. AU landscaping and vegetation shall be s ubject t o removal without notic,e, as may be required by Metro,politan for ongoing maintenance, access, repair, and construction activities. Metropolitan will not be financially responsible tor the removal of any landscaping and vegetation.

Drought-Tolerant Native and California Friendly Plan ts Metropolitan recommends use of drought-tolerant native and California Friendly® plants (exduding sensitive plants) on proposed projects. For more information reg~rding California Friendly® plants refer to www.bewaterwise.com.

3.3 Trees
Trees are generally prohibited within MetropoUtan's rights-of-way as they restrict Metropolitan's ability to operate, maintain and/or install new pipeline(s) located within these rights-of-way. Metropolitan will not be financially responsil)le for the removal and replacement of any existing trees should they interfere witfl access and any current or future Metropolitan project located within the right-ot:-way. lssu:e Oa:e: July 2018 Page 5of22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-48

The Merropoli1a11 Warer Disrricr of Soumem Ca.lifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSfflUCTION GUIDELI NES

3.4 Otiher Vegetatio n
Shrubs , bushes, vines, and groundcover are generally allowed withi n Metropolitan's rights-of-way . Larger shrubs are not allowed on Metropolitan fee pr,operties; however, they may be allowed within its easements if planted no closer t han 15 feel from the outside edges of existing or future Metropolitan facilities. Only groundcover is anowed to be planted directly over Metropolitan pipeline, turf blocks or similar is recommended to accommodate our utility vehicle access. Metropolita n will not be financially responsible for the removal and replaceme nt of the vegetation should it interfere with access and any current or Mure Metropolita n project.

3.5 Irrigation
Irrigation systems are acceptab le within Metro,politan's rights-of-way, provided valves and controllers are located near the edges of the right-of~way and do not interfere with Metropolitan vehicular access. A shutoff valve should also t>e located atong the edge of the right-of-way that Ylill allow the shutdovm of the system Ylithin the right-of-way should Metropolitan n eed to do any excavation. No poo'ling or saturation of water above Metropolil:an's pipeline and right-of-way 1is allowed. Additional restrictions appry to non-­ potab le water such as Recyded Water and are covered on Table 3 of Page 20.

3.6 Met ropolitan Vehi cular Access
Landscape plans must show Metropolitan vehicular access to Metropolitan's facirities and rights-of-way and: must be maintained by the property owner or manager or homeowners associatio n at all times. Walkways , lbike paths, and trails within Metropolilan 's rights-of-way may be used as Metropolitan access routes. (See Section 24, Walks , Bike Paths , and Trails ).

4.0 General UtUities
Note: For non-potabl.e piping like sewer, hazardous fluid, storm drain, disinfected tertiary recycled water and recycled water irrigation see Table 1 through Table 3.

4.1 Utility Stru ctures
Permanent utility structures (e.g., manholes, power poles, pull boxes, electrical vaults, etc.) are not allowed within Metropolitan's rights-of-way. Metropolitan irequests that all perma nent utility structures within puMc streets t>e placed as far from its pipelines and facilities as practical , but not closer than 5 feet from the outside edges of Metropolitan facilities.

Note: Non-potable utility pipelines are an exception to the 5-foot minimum clearance.

Non-potable utility pipelines should have 10 feel of separation

4.2 Utility Crossings
Metropolitan requests a minimum of 1 foot of vertical clearance between Metropolitan's pipeline and any utility crossing the piperne . Utility lines crossing Metropolitan's pipe­ lines must be as perpendicular to the p ipeline as poss ible. Cross-section drawings , showing proposed locations and elevations of utility lines and locations of Metropolitan's pipelines and limits of rights-of-way , must be submitted with utility plans, for all ls.sue Da.~e: July201 8 Pag e 6 of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-49

The Metropoliun WatN Districi of Soumem Carifomia IMPROVEMENTS ANO, CONSTRUCTION GUIOElJINES crossings. Metropolitan's pipelrne must be potholed under Metropolitm's supervision at the crossings (See Section 2.9).

4.3 Longitud inal Utilities
Installatio n of longitudinal utilities is generalliy not allowed along Metropolitan's rights-of­ way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests that all utilities parallel to Melropolitan's pipelines and appurtenant structures (facilities) be located as far from the facilities as possib le, with a minimum clearance of 5 feet from the outside edges of the pipeline Note: Non-potable utility pipelines are an exception to the 5-foot minimum clearance.

Non-potable utility pipelines should have 10 feet of separation (for more information See Table 1 on Page 18).

4.4 Underground Elect rica l Unes
Underground electrical conduits (110 volts o r greater) Which cross a Metropolitan's pipeline must have a minimum of 1 foot of vertical clearance between Metropolitan·s pipeline and the electrical lines. Longitudinal electrical ~nes, including pull boxes and vaults, in public streets should have a minimum separation of 5 feet from tine edge of a Metropolitan pipeline or structures.

4.5 Fiber Optic Lines
Fiber optic 5nes installed by directional boring require a m inimum of 3 feet of vertical clearance when boring is over Metropolitan's ptpelines and a m inimum of 5 feet of vertical clearance when boring is under Metropol itan's pipelines. Longitudinal fiber optic lines, including pull boxes, in public streets should have a minimum separation of 5 feet from the edge of a Metropolitan pipelines or structtlres. Potholing m ust be performed, under Metropolitan's supervision, to verify t he vertical clearances are maintained.

4.6 Overhead Eledrical and Telephone Lines
Overhead elecbical arnd teleiPhone lines, where they cross Metropolitan's rights-of-way, must have a minimum 35 feet of clearance, as measu red from the ground to the lowest point of the overhead line. Overhead electrical lines poles mu;st be located at least 30 feet laterally from the edges of Metropolitan's facmties or outside Metropolitan's iright­ of-way, whichever is greater.

Longitudinal overhead electrical and or telephone lines in public streets shou ld have a minimum separation of 1 O feet from t he edge of a Metropolitan pipelines or structures where possible.

4.7 Sewage Disposa l Systems
Sewage disposal systems, i:ncluding leach lines and septic tanks, must be a minimum of 100 feet from the ollts ide limits of Metropolitan's rights-of-way or the edge of its facilities, whichever is greatef. If soil conditions are poor, or other adverse site-specific conditions exist, a minim um distance of 150 feet is required. They must also comply with local and state healt1h code requirements as they r;e'late to sewage disposal systems in proximity to major drinking water supply pipelines.
lssu:e Da:e: July2018 Page 7of22
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-50

The Meuopoliz:an WillW Disuicz of Soumem California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

4.8 Underground Tanks
Underground tanks containing hazardous materials must be a minimum of 100 teet from the outside limits of Metropolitan's rights-of-way or edge of its facilities, whichever is greater. In addition, groundwater flow should be considered 1Nith the plaoement of underground tanks down-gradient of Melropolitan's facilities. 5 .. 0 Specific Utilities : Non-Potable Utility Pipelines In addition to Melropolitan's g eneral requirements, installation of non~potab[e utility pipelines (e.g., storm drains, sewers, and hazardous fluids pipelines) in Metropontan's rights-of-way and public street rights-of-way must also conform to the state Water Resources Control Board's Division of Drinking Water (DOW) regulation (Waterworks Standards) and guidance for separation of water mains and non-potable pipelines and to applicable llocal county health ccxle requirements. Written approval is required from DOW for the implementation of alternatives to the Watel'WOrks Standards arnd, effective December 14, .2017, requests tor alternatives to the Waterworks Standards must include information consistent with: DDW's Waterworks Standards Main Separation Alternative Request Checklist.

In addition to the follow ing general guidelines, furt her review of the proposed project must be evaluated. by Metropolitan and require ments may vary based on s ite specifi c conditions.

A Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Fluids (General Guideline See Tab'le 1 on Page 18) B. Storm Drain and Recycled Water (General Guideline See Table 2 on Page 19) C. lrrigalion with Recycled Water (General Guideline See Table 3 on Page 20), D. Metropolitan generally does not allow Irrigation with recycled water to be applied directly above its treated water pipe'lines
E. Metropolitan requests copies of project correspondence with regulating agencies (e.g., Regional Water Quality Control Board, DOW); regarding the application of recycled water for all projects located on Metropolitan's rights-of-way 6 .. 0 Cathod ic Protect ion/Electrolysis Test Stations

6.1 Metropolitan Cathodic Protection

6.2 Metropolitan's existing cathcxlic protection facilities in the vicinity of any proposed wort mu.st be identified prior lo any grading or excavation. The exact location, description, and type of protection mu.st be shown on all project plans. Please contact Metropolitan for the localion of its cathodic proteclion stations.

Review of Cathodic Protection Systems
Metropolitan mu.st review any proposed! installation of impressed-current cathodic pro­ tection systems on p·pelines crossing or paralleling Metropolitan's pipelines to determine any potential conflicts with Metropolitan's existing cathodic protection system. lssire Da.:e: July 20 18 Page8o f 22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-51

RVA
The .Werropolira.n Warer Disriic: of Sol.lZhEm CiJifomia IMf>RO\IEMEHrS AND CONS1RUCTION GUIDELINES 7 .0 Drainage

7.1 Drainage Changes Affect ing Metropolit an R ights-Of-Way

7.2 Changes to existing drainage that oould affect Metropolitan's rights-of-way require Metropolitan's approval. The project proponent must provide acceptable solutions to ensure Metropolitan's rights-of-way are not negatively a ffected by changes 1in the drain~ge conditions . Plans showing the changes, wilh a copy of a supporting, hydrology report and hydraulic calculations, must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. Long term maintenance of any proposed drainage facilities must be the respons ibility of the project proponent, City, County , homeowner's association, etc., wilh a clear understanding of where this responsibtlity lies. If drainage must be discha rged across Metropolitan's rights-of-way, it must be carried across by closed conduit or lined open clil:annel and must be shown on the plans.

Met ropolita n's Blowoff and Pum pwell Structures
Any changes to the existing local watercourse systems will need to be designed to accommo date Metropolitan's b'lowoffand pum pwell structures, which periodically convey discharged water from Metropolitan's blowoff and pumping well structures during pipeline dewatering. The project proponents' plans should include details of how these discharges are accommodated wittiin the proposed developmen t and must be submitted to Metropolitan for review and approval. Any blowoff discharge lines impacted must be modified accordingly at the expense of the project proponent

8.0 Grading and Settlement

8.1 Changes in Cover over Metropolitan Pipelines
The existing ,cover over Met ropolitan's pipelines must be maintained unless Metropolitan determines that proposed changes in grade and cover do not pose a hazard to the integrity of the piperne or an impediment to its maintenance capability. Load and settlement or rebound due to change in cover over a Metropolitan pipeline or ground in the area of Metropolitan's rights-of-way will be factors considered by Metropolitan during project review.

In general, the minimum oover over a Metropolitan pipeline is 4 feet and the maximum cover varies per different pipeline. Any changes to the existing grade may requlre that Metropolitan's pipeline be potholed under Metropolitan's supervision to vemy the existing cover.

8.2 Settlement
Any changes to the existing topography in the area of Metropolitan's pipeline or right-of­ way that result in significant settlement or !lateral displacement of Metropolrtan's pipelines are not acoeptable. Metropolitan Imay require submittal of a sons report showing, the predicted settlement of the pipeline at 10-foot intervals for review. Tlhe data must be carried past the point of zero change tn eaoh direction and the actua l size and varying d~pth of the fLII must be considered when determining the seH:lement. Possib'le settlement due to soil collapse, rebound and lateral displacement must also be included.

Issue Da_:e: J uly201B Pag~9o f 22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-52

The, Meiropolnan Watl'I" District of Soumem Carifomia IMPROVEMENTS ANOCONSlRUCTION GUIDELINES In general, the typical maximum allowed deflection for Metropolitan's pipelines must mot exceed a deflection of 114-inch for every 100 feet of pipe l.ength. Metropolitarn may require additional information per its Geotechnical Guid'elines. Please contact Metropolitan's Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

9.0 Construction Equipment

9.1 Review of Prop osed Equipment
Use of equtpment across or adjacent to Metropolilan 's facilities is subjeeit to prior review and written approval by Metropofitan. Excavation, backfill, and other work in the vicinity of Metropolitan's facilities must lbe performed only by methods and with equipment approved by Metropolitan. A list of all equipment to be used must be sul>mitt,ed to Metropolitan a minimum of 30 days before the start of work.

A. For equipment operating within paved public roadways, equipment 1hat imposes loads not greater than that of an MSHTO H-20 vehide (see Rgure 1 on Page 21} may operate across or adjacent to Metropolitan's pipelines provided the equipment operat.es in non-vibratory mode and the road remains continuously paved.

B. For equipment operating Vllithin unpaved public roadways, when the total cover over Metropo'litan's pjpeline is 10 feet or greater, equipment imposing loads no ,greater than those imposed by an MSHTO H-20 vehicle may operate over or adjacent to the pipeline provided the equipment is operated in non-vibratory mode. IFor cmssings, vehicle path shall be maintained in a smooth condition, with no breaks in grade for 3 vehicle lengths on each stde of the pipeline.

9.2 !Equipment Restrictions
In ,general, no equipment may be used closer than 20 feet from all Metro:politan above­ ground structures. The area around the structures should be flagged to prevent equipment encroachirng il'lto this zone.

9.3 Vibratory Compa ction Equipment
Vibratory compaction equipment may not be used in vibratory mode within 20 feet of the edge of Metropolitan's pipelines.

9.4 !Equipment Descr iptions
The following informationlspecifications for ,each piece of equipment should be included on the list:

A. A description of the equipment, including the type, manufacturer, model year, and model number. IFor ,example, wheel tractor-scraper, 1990 Caterpillar 627E.

B. The empty and loaded total weight and: the corresponding weight distnbution. If equipment will be 1used empty only, it should be clearty stated.

C. The wheel base (for each axle), tread width {for each axle}, and tire footprint (width and length) or the track ground contact (width and length), and, track gauge (center to center of trac:k).

Issue Da::e; July 2018 Page 10 of 22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-53

The Merropoli Lin Water Disrric:r of Sou?hem Califo mi;J IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

10.0 Excav ations Close to MetropoUtan Faci liities

10.11 Shor ing Design Submittal
Excavation that impacts Metropolitan's facilities requires that the contractor submit an engineered shoring design to Metropolitan for review and acceptance a minimum of 30 days before the scheduled start of excavation. Excavation may not begin until the shoring design is accepted in writing by Metropolitan.

Shoring desrgn submittals must include all required trenches, pits, and tunnel or jacking operations and related calcu!ations. Before starting the shoring design, the design engineer should consult with Metropolitan regarding Metropo'litan's requirements, particularly as to any special procedures that may be required.

10.2 Shoring Design Requirements
Shoring design submittals must l:>e stamped and signed by a California registered civil or structural engineer. The following, requirements apply:

A. The submitted shoring must provide appropriate support for soil adjacent to and under Metropdlitan's facilities.

B. Shoring submittals must indude detailed procedures for the installation and removal of the shoring.

C. Design calculations must follow the TIiie 8, Chapter 4, Articte 6 of the California Gode of Regulations (CCR) guidelines. Accepte<:I methods of analysis must be use<:!.

D. Loads must be in accordance with the CCR guidelines or a soils report by a geotectmical consultant
E. AJI members must be secured to prevent s5ding, falling, or kickouts.

Metropolitan's ptpelines must l:>e located by potholing under Metropolitan's supervision before the beginning construction. Use of driven piles within 20 feet of the center1ine of Metropolitan's p ipeline is not allowed. Piles installed in drilled holes must have a minimum 2-foot clearance between Metropolitan's pipeline and the edge of the drtlfed hole, and a minimum of Hoot dearance between any part of the shoring and Metropolitan's pipeline.

11.0 Support of' Metro 1politan1 F'acUities

11.11 Suppo.rt Design Submitta l
If temporary support of a Metropolitan facility is required, the contractor shall submit a support design plan to Metropolitan for review and approval a minimum of 30 days before the scheduled start of work. Wor1c may not begin until the support design is approved in writing by Metropolitan. Before starting design, the design engineer should consult with Metropolitan regarding Metropolitan's requi~emenls.

11.2 Support Design Requirements
Support design submittals must be prepared, stampe<:I, and signed by a California registere<:I civil or structural engineer. The following requirements apply:

Issue Da:e: July 2018 Page 11 of22
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-54

The illferropoli.a n Waier Dimicz of Soumem Cafifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES A. Support drawings must include detailed procedures for the instaDation and removal of the support system.

B. Design calculations must follow accepted practices, and accepted methods of analysis must be used.

C. Support designs must show uniform support of Metropo1itan's facilities with minima'! deflection.

D. The total weig'ht of the facility must be transferred to the support system before supporting soil is fully excavated.

E. All members must be secured to prevent sTiding, falling, or l<.ickouts.

12.0 Backfill
112.1 Met ropolitan Pipe line Not Supported
In areas where a portion of Metropolitan pipe~ne is not supporte d during construc.tion, the backfill under and to an elevation of 6 inches above the top of the pipeline must be one-sa ck m inimum cement sand sluny. To prevent adhesion of the sluny to Metropolitan's pipeTine, a minimum 6-mil~hick layer of polyethylene sheeting or similar approved sheeting must be placed between the concrete support and the pipeline. 112.2 Met ropolitan Pipeline Pa rt ially Exposed
In areas where a Metropolitan pipeline is partially exposed dul"ing construction, the backfill must be a minimum of 6 inches above the top of the pipeline wilh sand com­ pacted to minimum 90 percent compaction.
112.3 Met ropol itan Cut and Cover Conduit on Colorado River Aqueduct (CRAl In areas where a Metroporitan cut and cover conduit is exposed, the following guidelines apply:

A. No vehicle or equipment shall operate over or cross the conduit when the cover is less than 3 feet.

B. Track-type dozer 'Mth a gross vehicle weight of 12,000 lbs or less may be used over the conduit when the cover is a minimum of 3 feet.

C. Wheeled vehicles with a gross vehide weight of 8,000 lbs or less may operate over the conduit when the cover is a minimum of 4 teet.

D. Tracked doz.er or whee'led ve'hicle should be used to push material over the conduit from the side.

E. Tracked dozer or wheeled vehicle should -gradually increase cover 0111 one side of the conduit and then cross the conduit and increase cover on the other side of lhe con­ duit The cover should be increased on one side of the conduit until a maximum of 2 feet of till has been placed . Tthe cover over the conduit is not allowed to be more than 2 feet higher on one side of the ,conduit than on the other side.

F. The -cover should be gradually increased over the conduit until the grade elevations have been restored.

Issue Da.:e: July20 18 Page i 2 of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-55

RVA
The Merropol iran Watw" Dii;rric;r of Sotnhem Carifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCJION GUIDELINES

13.0 Pilles

13.1 Impacts on Metropo lit an Pipelines
Pile support tor structures could impose !lateral, vertical and seismic loads on Metropolitan's pipelines. Since the installation of piles could also cause settlement of Metropolitan pipelines, a settlement and/or lateral deformation study may be required for pile installations within 50 feet of Metropolitan's p ipelines. Metropolitan may irequire additional infom1ation per its Geo-technical Guidelines for pile installation. Please contaot Metropol1tan's Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

13.2 Permanen t Cast -in-p lace Piles
Permanent cast-in-place piles must be constructe<J so that down drag forces of the pile do not act on Metropolitan's pipeline. The pile m ust be designed so that down drag forces are not deve'loped trom the ground surtace to spring line of Metropolitan's pipeline.

Permanent cast-in-place piles shall not be plaoed closer than 5 feet from th.e edge of Metropolitan's pipeline. Metropolitan may require additional infom1ation per its Geo­ technical Guidelines for pile mstallation. Pleas,e contact Metropolitan's Substructures Team for a copy of the Geotechnical Guidelines.

14.0 Protective Slabs for Road Crossings Over Metropol itan Pipelines Protective slabs must be permanent cast-in-place concrete protective slabs conf1gured in accordance with Drawing SK-1 (See Figure 2 on Page 22).

The moments and shear for the protective slab may be derived from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The following requirements apply:

A. The concrete must be designed to meet the requirements of MSHTO B. Load and impact factors must be in acoordance with MSHTO. Accepted methods of analysis must be used.

C. The protective sl,ab design must !>e stamped and signed by a California registered civa or structural engineer and submitte<J to Metropolitan with supporting calculations for review and approval.

Existing protective slabs that need to be lengthene<J can !>e lengthened witflout modification, provide<J lhe cover and other toadin9 have not been increased_

15.0 Blasti ng
At least 90 days prior to the start of any drilling for rock excavation blasting, or any blasting in the vicinity of Metropo'litan's facilities, a site-specific b lasting plan must be submitte<J to Metropolitan for review and approval. The plan must consist of, but not be limit,ed to, hole diameters, timing sequences, explosive weights, peak particle velocities (PPV) at Metropolitan pipelines/structures, and their distances to blast locations. The PPV must be estimated based on a site-specific power law equation. The power law equation provides the peak particle velocity versus the scaled distanoe and must !>e calibrated based on measure<J values at the site.

Issue Da:e: July 20 18 Page 13of22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-56

The Merropolira n Water District of Souzhem California IMPROIIEMEKJS ANO CONSTRLICTION GUlCIELINES

16.0 Metropol itan Plan Review Costs, Constr uction Costs and Billi ng

16.1 Plan Review Costs
Metropolitan plan reviews requil'ing 8 labor hours or fess are generally performed at no cost t o the project proponent. Metropolitan plan reviews requiring more than 8 labor hours must be paid by the project proponent, unless tihe project proponent has superior rights a t the project area. The plan review will include a wmten response detailing Metropolitan's comments, requirements, andfor approval.

A deposit offimds in the amount of the estimated cost and a signed letter agreement will be required from the project proponent before Metropolitan b~ins or continues a detailed engineering plan review that exceeds 8 labor hours.

16.2 Co,st of Modification of f acilities Performed by Metropolitan Cost of modification work conducted by Metropolitan wm be borne by the project proponent, when Metropolitan has paramount/prior rights at the subject location.

Metropolitan will transmit a cost estimate for the modification work to be performed (when it has paramounVprior rights) and will require that a d'eposit, in the amount of the ,estimate, be received before the wo111 will be perfom1ed.

16.3 f inal Billi ng
Final bming will be based on the actual costs incurred, including engineering plan review, inspection, materials, construction, and administrative overhead charges carculated in accordance with Metropotitan's standard accounting practices. If the total cost Iis less than the deposit, a refund will be made; however, if the cos1 exceeds the deposit, an invoice for the additional amount will be forwarded for payment.

17.0 Stree t Vacations and Reservat;ion of Easeme nts for MetropoUtan A reservation of an easement is requir,ed when all or a portion of a public street where Metropolitan facilities are located is to be vacated. The easement must !be equal to the street width being vacated or a m inimum 40 feet The reservation must identify Metropolitan as a "public entity" and not a "pub~c utility," prior to recordation of the vacation or tract map. The reservation of an easement must be submitted to Metropolitan for review prior to final approval.

18.0 Metropol itan Land Use Guidelines
If you are inter,ested in obtaining permission to use Metropolitan land (temporary or long term), a Land Use Fonrn must be compteted and submitted to Metropolitan for review and consideration.

A nonrefundable processing, fee is required to cover Metropolitan's costs for reviewing your request. Land Use Request Forms can be found at:
http:/lmwdh2o.com/PDF Doing Your Business/4.7.1 Land Use Request fom1 revised.pdf The request should be emaired to [email protected],or contact the Real Property Development and Management (RPDM) Group at (213) 217-TT50. lssu-e Da·.e: July 2018 Pag-e 14 of 22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-57

RVA
The MerropoHran• Wolter District of Souzhem Cafifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUC TION GUIDELINES Mer the 1initial application fom, has been submitted, Metropolitan may require the following in order to process your request:

A A map indicating the location(s) where access is needed, and the location & size (iheigh~ width and depth) of any invasive subsurface activity (boreholes, trenches, etc.).

18. Tne California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) document(s) or studies that have been prepared for the project (e.g., initial study, notiice of exemption, Environmenta'I Impact Report (EIR), Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), etc.).

C. A copy of an ACORD insurance certification naming Metropolitan as an additional insured, or a current copy of a statement of self-insurance.

D. Confirmation of the legal name of the person(s) or entity(ies) that are to be named as the permittee(s) in the entry permit .

E. Confirmation of the purpose of the land us.a.

F. The name ofthe person(s) with the authority to sign the documents and any specific signature title block requirements for that person or any other persons required to sign the document (i.e., legal counsel, Board Secretary/Clerk, etc.).

G. A description of any vehides that will have access to the property. The ,exact make or model information is not necessary; however, the general vehicle type, expected maximum dimensions (height, length, width), and a specific maximum weight must be provided.

Land use a,pplications and proposed use of the property must be compatible with Metropolitan's present and/or future use of the property. Any preliminary review of your request by Metropolitan shall not be construed as a promise to grant any property rights for the use of Metropolitan's property.

19.0 Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations As a public agency, Metropolitan is required to ,comply witfl all applicable environmental laws and regulations related to the activities it carries out or a~proves. Consequently, project plans, maps, and other information must be reviewed to determine Metropolitan's obligations pursuant to state and federal environmenta'l laws and regulations, including, but not limited to:

A. California Environmental Oua'lity Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000-2 1177 ) and the State CEOA Guidelines (Galifomia Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 1500-15387)
IB. Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531, et seq.

C. California Fish and Game Code Sections 2050-2069 ~California ESA) D. California Fish and Game Code Section 1602
E. California Fish and Game Code Sections 3511, 4700, 5050 and: 5515 (California fully protected species)
F. Federal IMlgratory Bird Treaty Act {MBTA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 703-71i2 G. Federal Clean Water Act (ind uding but not limited to Sections 404 and: 401) 33 U.S.C. §§ 1342, 1344)
Issue Da~: July 2018 Page 15 of 22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-58

The, Meuopoli i:an, Water District of Soumem California IMPROVEMENTS ANO CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES H. Porter Cologne Water Qual[ty Control Act of 1969, Galifomia Water Code §§ 13000- 14076 _
1_ Titre 22, California Code of Regulations , Chapter 16 (California Waterworks Standards),, Section 64572 (Water Main Separation)
Metropolitan may require the project applicant to pay for any environmental review, comp'liance and/or mitigation costs incurred to satisfy such llegal obligations_ Issue Da!e: J uly 2018 Page 16 of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-59

The rlleITOpOlirarr Watw Disrrict of Soumem Cafifomia IMPRO\IEMBfTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

20.0 Paramount Rights J Metropo litan's Rights within Exiisting Rights- o,f-Way
Facilities constructe<1 within Metropolitan's rtghts--0f-way shall be subject to the paramount right of Metropolitan to use its rights-of-way for the purpose for which they were acquire<1. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the e xercise of their lights, find it necessary to remove or r elocate any facilities from its lights-of-way, such removal and replacement or relocation shall be at t he e~ense of the owner of the facility.

21.0 Disclaimer an.d Information Accuracy
Metropolitan assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the substructure infom1ati.on herein prov.ided. The user assumes responsibmty for verifying substructure locations before ,excavating and assumes all liability for damage to Metroporitan's facilities as a result of such excavation_ Additionally, t he user is cautioned to conduct surveys and other field investigations as you may deem prudenl to assure that your project plans a re correct Tihe relevant repr,esentative from Metropolitan must lbe called at least two mr1dng days, before any work activity in proximity to Metropo litan's facilities.

It generalty takes 30 days to review project plans and provide wlitt en respo nses. Metropolitan reserves the light to modify requirements based on case-specific issues and regulatory developments .
lssu.e Da·.e: J uly 20 18 Page 17 of 22
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-60

The Merropo/i-ra_n Wa!Pr Disr:rict of Soumem Carifomia IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUC'llON GUIDELINES Table 1: Genera l Guidelines for Pipeline Separation between Metropolitan's Pipeline1 and Sanitar y Sewer2 or Hazardous Fluid Pipeline3
Pi~line Crossings Metropolitan requires that sanitary sewer and hazardous fluid pipelines that cross Metropolita n's pipelines have special pipe construction (no joints) and secom:lary containmen~. This is required for the fuU width of Metropolitan's rights-of0way or within 10 feet tangent to the outer e<:lges of Metropolita n's pipeline within public streets. Addit ionally, sanitary sewer and hazardous fluid pipelines crossing Metropolitan's pipelines must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot vertical clearance between the top and the bottom of MetropoTitan's pipeline and the pipe casing.

These requirements apply to all sanitary sewer crossings regardless if the sanitary sewer main is located below or above Metropolitan':s pipeline.

Para~el Pi~eline Metropolitan generally does not permtt t he installation of longitudinal pipeUnes along its rights--0f-way_ With in public streets. Metropolttan requires t hat all parallel sanitary sewer, hazardous fl'uid pipe~nes and/or non-potable utilities be locate<:! a minim um of 1 D feet from the outside edges of Metropolitan's pipe~nes. When 10-foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, longitudinal pipelines require special pipe construction (no joints) and secondary containment".

Sewer Manhole Sanitary sewer manholes are not allowed within Metropolitan's rights-of-way. Within public streets, Metropolitan requests manholes parallel to its pipeline be locate<:! a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of its pipetlnes. When W foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, the structure must have secondary containment5•
Notes.·
1 Separa!ioo ~lances are meacured from the outer edgec of each pipe. : Sanifal)r :;ewer requirements apply to all recycled water treated i!o /eGS th.an disinfected terlia,y recycled water (disinfected :;econdary recycled water or le=). Recyc led wa.:e-r de-fin icons are included in TIile- 22, Californ ia Code of Regu lations . Chapiier 3 rNater Recyc[,ng Crit;;ria). Section 6030 1. 3 Hazardous fluids include e.g., oil, fuels, chemical:::, i11du:::trial was-'es, wastewater sludge, etc. ~ Secondary Containment for Pipe4i11e - Seoond a,y cootainment coosi*-1 of a ,oonti11uow: pjpeline cleeve (no joints ).

Example:; acceptable ID Metropolitan illcfude waded steel pipe .wth grout in a11flllfar :;pace and cathodic protection (un.tess coated with non-a)llductiv e material) and High Density Polyethyfer,e (HDPE) pipe with !1.tSiorr-weided joints . 6 Secondary Containment for Structures - Secondary cootainment coosists of e:xtemal HOPE finer or other approved method .

Issue Da.:e: July 20 18 Page 1Sof22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-61

The Mecropolha.n W.llN Disrrict of Souztiem Cilifomia IMPROVEMENTS ANO CONSTRllCllON GUIDELINES Table 2: General Guidelines for Pipeline Separat ion between Metrop olitan's Pipe line1 and Stonn Drain anclfor Disinfected Tertiary Recycled Water2 P,i~el ine Cro ssings Metropol itan requtres crossing ]Pipelines to be special p_r.e construction (no joints) or have secondary containment within 10-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropol itan's pi,peline.

Additionally, pipelines crossing Metropolitan's ]Pipelines must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum H oot vertical clearance.

Parallel Pi~elilile Metropolita n generally does not perm it the installation of longitudinal pipelines along, its rights-of-way. Within pubnc streets , Metropolitan requests that all parallel pipelines be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of
Metropolitan's pipeLines. When 10-foot horizontal separation criteria cannot be met, special ptpe construction (no joints) or secorndary containment3 are re-quired.

Storm Dra in Permanent utility structures (e.g., manhole. catch basin, inlets) Manho'le are not allowed within Metropolitan's rights-of-way Within public streets , Metropolitan requests all structures paralle l to its JP·peline be located a minimum of 10 feet from the outside edges of its pipelines. When 1i0 foot horizontal s~paration criteria cannot be met, the structure must have secondary containment .

Notes:
1 Separation dictance:; are mea::ured from the outer edgec of each pipe. 2 Diainfected tertiary recycled water a:, defined in Title 22, California Code of Regulations . Chapte r 3 (Water Recycling Criti?ria ), Section 60301.
3 Secondary Containment for Pipelirie - Se<:oridary containment consistt: of a oon!irruou.:: pjpeliru! ::Jeeve (no jojrltt: ).

Example:;; acoeplable lo Mefropolitan include welded :;feel pipe Mith grout in arinular space and cafhodk; profEC!icn (unfe.ss coati!'d •with t101i-<xmductive material ) and High Dencdy Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe with fusion-welded joints.. ' Secondary Containment for Structure:r; - Secondary containm ent consists of external HOPE liner or other approved method .

Issue Da:::e: J\Jly 2018 Page 19of 22
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-62

The .Werropolizan Waiw DismCl of Soumem California IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Table 3: General Guidelines for Pipeline Sepamtion 1 between Metro politan's Pipel ine and Recyc led Water2:.4 Irrigatio ns
Pressurized recycled • Crossings - must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum H oot irrigation mainlines vertical d earance. Crossing pressurized recyded irrigation mainlines must be special pipe construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3 within 10-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropolitan's pipeline.
·• Longitudinal - must maintatn a m tnimum 10-foot horizontal separation and route along the perimeter of Metropolitan's rights- of~way where possible.

Intermittently ·• Crossings - must be perpendicular and maintain a minimum 1-foot Ener,gized Recycled vertical dearance. Crossing irrigation laterals within 5-feet tangent Water Irrigation to the outer edges of Metropolitan's pipeline must be specia l pipe System Components construction (no joints) or have secondary containment3. • Longitudinal - must maintain a minimum 5.-foot horizontal separation between all intem1ittently energized recycled water irrigation system com,ponents (e g . irrigation lateral lines, control valves, rotors ) and the outer edges of Metropolitan's pipeline.

Longitudinal irrigation laterals wilh in 5-feet tangent to the outer edges of Metropo litan's pipeline must be special ptpe constructio n (no joints) or have secondary containment3.

Irrigation Structures Irrigation structures such as meters, pumps, control valves, etc. must be located outside of Metropolitan's rights-of-way.

Irrigation spray rotors Irrigation spray rotors must be located a minimum of 20-,foot from any near Metropolitan's Metropolita n above ground structures wi1h the spray direction away abovegro und facilities from these structures. These rotors should be routinely maintained and adjusted as inecessary to ensure no over-spray into 20..foot clear z.ones.

Irrigations near open Irrigation with recycled water near open canals and aqueducts will canals and aqueducts require a setback distance to be determined based on site-specific conditions. Runoff of recycled water must be contained within an approved use area and not impact Metropolitan facilities.

Appropriate setbacks must also be in place to prevent overspray of recycled water impacting Metropolitan's facilities.

Nofes.-
1 Separation distance:;; .are mearored from the outer ed~ of each pipe. 2 Requiremer"lfs for recycled waterinigaiion apply l.o all le-velc of lreafm;,nf of r.ecyc{ed water fo.r OOl'l•potable ir.:ea Recycled wate.- de.'illitions are included in Ti~e 22. Ca!ifom ia: Code of Regu lations. Ch.ap;.er 3 (Water Recycling Clitroa). Section 60301.
3 Secondary Containment for Pip.eline - Secondary coolaiM>ent C011sists of a· continuous pipeline cleeve (no joints).

Example:, a~ptable ID Me-.lropolitan indude welded s.feel pjpe with grout in annular cpace a nd ca!hod"JC p rotection (unless coated with nori-<XN!ductive material) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE} pipe with fus.iorr-wetdedjoint s. # Jtrig afiori , 'Mfh ~cycled waw- t:ha/1 not be applied cfirectfy above Metrop ol"Jtan':; treated wafer pi,pe/inr= Issue Da.:e: J uly 2018 Page 20 of 22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-63

RVA

IMPROVEMENTS MD CONSTRUCTION GUIOEUNES
Figure 1: AASHTO H-20 loading
H 20-44 B,000 LBS. 32,000 LBS*
~ 14'--0H ~
~ . W = 1'0T AL WEIG,HT ~F" 3: i TRU CK ANO LOAD ~
~---·0.4 W
I
I .

I
~ ----$-

CLEARANCE AND

LOAD LANE WIDTH
10'.()"
-+-...,.. _ _ ___...&,I-IL-,111.~ ~ ... . --
Nole: The H loadings consist of a two-axle truck or the corresponding lane loadings as fllustrated above. The H loadings are designated "H" followed by a number indicating the gross weight in tons of the standard truck.

Issue Da.:e: July 2018 Page21 of22
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-64

IMPROVEMENTS AHO CONSTRUCTIOfl GUIOEL•IES
Figure 2: Drawin g SK-1
,,,.. E9
\
T TT
Issue Date: July 2018 Page22of22
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-65
Letter 6 – The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Commenter: Diane Doesserich
Date: July 15, 2021
Response 6.1:

The commenter indicates that upon review of the DEIR and the more detailed project depictions provided therein, they determined that the Project would require the use of Metropoli tan fee owned property on Barton Street, specifically, the portion of the street extending westerly of its centerline. The use of Metropolitan’s fee-owned property to extend Barton Street will require the submittal of land use application (attached as part of the comment letter) for the granting of a public road easement or the issuance of an entry perm it. The comment states Metropolitan will consider the FEIR to evaluate the applicants’ request for a public road easement or entry permit.

The applicant will apply for a public road easement from Metropolitan. As outlined in the DEIR, Section 5.12 Transportation (DEIR, p. 5.12 -50), “The Project would construct Barton Street between the Project’s northern boundary and southern boundary at its ultimate full -section pavement width as a Local Street (66 -foot right-of-way). Thus, the roadway improvements to Barton Street including within Metropolitan’s fee-owned property are a part of the Project and is considered as part of the Project’s construction impacts. The Project’s potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts, including those from within Metropolitan’s fee-owned property in Barton Street, are considered throughout the entire DEIR analysis, Section 5.0 Potentially Significant Environmental Effects to 8.0 Alternatives. Therefore, the potential impacts associated with the use of Metropolitan’s fee owned property on Barton Street and issuance of a public road easement by Metropolitan are analyzed and described in this EIR. The DEIR, Section 3.4 Discretionary Actions and Approvals pp. 3.0-42-3.0-43, is revised as follows:

Metropolitan Water District
• Issuance of Public Road Easement

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-66
Comment Letter 7 – Go lden State Environmental Justice Alliance Comment letter 7 commences on the next page.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-67

7.]

7.2 RVA
July 16, 2021
VIA.EMAIL
Veronica Hernandez, Senior Planner
City ofRiverside
0 .o. Box 79222
Corono CA 92877
Community & Economic Development Department - Planning Division 3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, California 92522
[email protected]

SUBJECT; COl\fMENTS ON SYCAMORE 1HLLS DISTRIBUTION CEI\TfER DR (SCH NO. 2020079023}
To whom it may cone.em:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Sycamore Hills Distribution Center EIR.. Please accept and consider these comments on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance. Also, Golden State Environmental Jlh"1ic.e Alliance formally requests to be added to the public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public. notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P.O. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.
l.0Summary
The project proposes the development and operation oft\vo warehouse/distribution buildings on the approximately 48 acre project site. Building A is proposed on Pare.el l and will be 400,000 square feet in size, including 10,000 square feet of office area., 390,000 square feet of warehouse area, 88 dock doors, 394 passenger car parking spaces and 117 truck parking spaces. Building B Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-68

Page2of16
is proposed on Parcel 2 and will be 203,100 square feet in size, including 10,000 square feet of office area, 193,100 square feet of warehouse area, 34 dock doors, 238 passenger car parking spaces and 4 5 truck parking spaces.

The project site contains an existing area of approximately 11.6 acres legally designated as "Restricted Property" which land locks proposed Parcel 1. The Restricted Property area supports a jurisdictional drainage and associated riparian habitat and was required as a condition of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit from the U.S. Anny Coips of Engineers for construction of the Grnve Community Church at an off-site location, approximately one mile southwest The 7 _2 Restricted Property is intended for preservation in a natural condition. The project proposes to Cont 'd remove 0.81 acres of the Restricted Property to create a driveway connecting Parcel 1/Building A to Alessandro Boulevard. 1.44 acres of land elsewhere on the project site will be incorporated into Parcel A, for a net gain of0.63 acre of new Restricted Property. Parcel A and Bare proposed to have a total of12. 23 acres of Restricted Property.

7.3 Proposed Parcel C totaling 1.18 acres is proposed to be developed with a trailhead parking lot to serve the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park and subsequently dedicated to the City.

Improvements include a parking lot, sidewalk, shade structure, bike rack, drinking fountain, fencing. and a Fire Department access gate.

3.0 Project Description
The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Business/Office Park (B/OP), a Zoning designation of Business/Manufacturing Park - Specific Plan Overlay (BMP-SP), and an Industrial (I) designation within the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan. The B/OP General Plan designation provides for Alight industrial and small warehouse uses (up to 10,000 square feet per site)1." A conflict exists between the quantity of warehousing allowed by the site's General Plan designation and the quantity allowed by the Zoning designation and Specific Plan. A General Plan Amendment to the Industrial Land Use designation which provides for larger warehousing/distribution uses is required for the proposed project to proceed. This information is not disclosed or analyzed any,.,vhere throughout the EIR.. The Land Use and Planning section and the Project Description do not provide a description of the B/OP Land Use designation. A revised EIR. must be prepared which includes this information and provides an 1 Rin~rside General Plan 2025 - Land Use and Utban Design E1ement lrttps://rivers ideca.go v/redd/si tes/ m;eg;id1!f3..gpY£ajtt/ files/pdf/planninglgeneral -plan/ 04 Land Use and Urban Desi&µ Element with%20maps%20CO:MPLEIE%20AUGUST%202019 .pclf RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-69

73 _ye.curate, adequate analysis of the proposed project's inconsistency with the existing General cont 'd l.:_Ian Land Use designation.
7-4
The EIR provides a list of the required entitlements and discretionary actions necessary for the proposed project to proceed . The EIR. states th.at a Minor Conditional Use Peanit is required pursuant to Riverside Municipal Code Section 19.150.020 - Base Zones Peanitted Land Uses2 for Business and Manufacturing Park (BMP) Zone. However, Section 19.150.020 notes th.at a Conditional Use Permit is required for any warehous e/distribution facility in the BMP Zone that exceeds 100,000 square feet (sf). The project proposes 603,100 sf of warehousing/distribution facilities; therefore, a CUP is required instead of a Minor CUP. The EIR. is inadequate as an informational document and does not provide an accurate list or analysis of required discretionary actions (CEQA § 15121).
urther, the EIR does not describe the mechanism or legal instrument in which the proposed modifications to the existing 11.6 acre Restricted Property will be comp leted. The _ proposed

7.5 roject cannot proceed without approval of the modifications to the Restricted Property and the

7.6 mechanism for completing this must be included as part of a revised EIR It is also notable that the EIR does not include a floor plan for either of the buildings. Toe basic components of a Planning Applicat ion include a site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, and elevations. Additionally, the site plan provided in Figure 3.0-9 and the elevations of Figures

3. ~ 14 A/B do not provide any detailed information such as parcel size, site coverage, or building height. The EIR bas excluded the proposed floor plans and a detailed site plan/elevations from public review , \Vhich does not comply v.ith CEQA' s requirements for adequate informational docmnents and meaningful disclosure (CEQA § 15121 and 21003(b)). An EIR.must be prepared which includes these informational items.
t
.2 Air Quality

7.7 The ~ output sheets do not accurately reflect the project as proposed in the EIR The RVA
~ analysis does not include any surface parking spaces. Surface parking lots are 1 Riverside Municipal Code Sect.ion 19.150.020 https://library.muwoode.com/ca/ri\·erside/codes/ rode pf, w4iPaw:s?
nodeld=PTIICOOR ill19ZO ARTVBAZOREUSDEPR CH19.150BAZOPELAUS 19.150.020PELA us
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-70
Page4 of16
defined as individual land uses in the ~ User Guide3 and must be entered into the analysis. Further, the Air Quality modeling does not analyze the whole of the project. The 7_7 ~ analysis excludes the trailhead parking lot, park, and associated improvements on cont'd Parcel C which will be dedicated to the City. The EIR must be revised which includes these

7.8 7.9
items in order to il.¼<;\lmely. m(jA~~ -an~~ ~WJP.i\~9:f tb.~W::Wffie9.PI~~- The ~Moo- output sheets have excluded any hauling trips for analysis. The Project Description states that an "estimated 40,000 cubic yards of excess material will be moved from Parcel 1 to Parcel 2" in order for the onsite grading to balance. The EIR notes that «this excess material will be transported via the existing dirt road between the p.ircels ( crossing through Parcel A), which will be utilized temporarily during construction and restored post-construction." Figure 3.0-3 depicts the eastern half of Parcel A as existing restricted property. It is not feasible or appropriate for haul trucks to traverse the existing or proposed restricted property of Parcel A to transport soil/material between Parcel 1 and 2. It must also be noted that the California Department of Fish and \Vtldlife also expressed similar concerns about construction ofan access road under lands conserved under a restricted covenant in ~Titten comments responding to the NOP.

Given a standard 10 cubic yard haul truck capacity, transporting 40,000 cubic yards of soil/ material would require 400 haul truck trips. The EIR must be revised to include an enforceable mitigation measure requiring all vehicles, including haul trucks, to utilize public roads for all purposes and prohibit any activity related to project construction/operation on the existing or proposed restricted property. The revised EIR must also include the required 400 haul truck trips in all applicable sections of environmental analysis.

Section 7.35.010(8)(5) of the Riverside Municipal Code (RMC) prohibits construction activity between the hours of7:00 P.M. and 7:00 AM. Monday through Friday, and betv.;een 5:00 P 1.1.. and 8:00 AM on Saturday. All such activities are also prohibited on Sundays. Thus, the legal hours of construction in the City of Riverside are 7:00 AM. - 7:00 P .M., Monday - Friday and 8:00 A.M. · 5:00 PM on Saturday. The EIR does not provide a "worst-case scenario" analysis of construction equipment emitting pollutants for the legal 12 hours per weekday plus 9 hours on Saturday. It is legal for construction to occur for much longer homs and an additional day (6 days per week including Saturday) than modeled in the Air Quality Analysis. The Air Quality modeling must be revised to account for these legally possible longer construction days and increased number of construction days. If shorter hours of construction are proposed by the l ~ User Guide http :J/www.a9md.eo 11/doc~ def.ault-1ow-ce/calttmod/user 's-guide--octob~r-201 7 .pdi.' ~
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-71
Page S of16

7.9 measure with field verificati on by an enforcement entity of the lead agency (CEQA § 2108 1.6 {
project, this must be reflected in the EIR analysis and included as an enforceable mitigation cont'd (b)).

7.10 7.11

7.12 RVA
The EIR. does not include for analysis relevant environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts , including cumulati ve impacts from the proposed projecl This is especiall y significant as the surrounding community is highly burdene.d by pollution. According to ~ 3.0, CalEPA ' s screening tool that ranks each census tract in the state for pollution and socioeconomic wlnerability , the proposed project ' s census tract (606504 2217) ranks worse than 56% of the rest of the state overall. The surrounding community , including sensiti ve receptors such as the single family residences to the south, bears the impact of multiple sources of pollution and is more polluted than average on every pollution indicator measured by ~ - For example , the project census tract ranks in the 98th percentile for ozone burden and the 84th percentile for PM 2.5 burden, which is typicall y attributed to heavy truck activity in the a:rea.

Further, the project ' s census tract is a diverse community including 22% Hispanic and 8% African-American residents, ·which are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pollution_ Additionally, the surroundin g community bas a higher proport ion of babies born with low birth weights than 59% of the state, which make s those children more vulnerable to asthma and 0th.er health issues. The community ranks in the 57th percentile for asthma and 38th percentile for incidence of cardiovascu lar disease, which are exacerbated by Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas impacts.

Exlubit 4-1: Project (Passenger Car) Trip Distribution of Appendix L (Traffic and VMT Analys is) depicts 20% of passenger cars exiting the project site traveling westbound on Alessandro Blvd. The HRA's Exhibit 4-B: Receptor Locations only models project traffic traveling eastbound on Alessandro Blvd. Excluding the westboun d Alessandro Blvd. traffic from modeling skews impacts downwar ds and does not equitably analyze all sensitive receptors, such as th.e residents along westbound Alessandro Blvd. The EIR. must be revised with an HR.A that models the 20% of project trips traveling westbound on Alessandro Blvd. to acleroiateh' . .ancJ. ac:.cwa.Wy • .an~ al.Jll9!rntially.simwcmtWJPA~ j:2f ~n.c~~i;l .pnti,.e:c;t.

The HRA is misleading to the public and decision makers as the tex1: appears to analyze each residential receptor for their respective 9- and 30- year exposure timeline . However, Appendix

2.2 Risk Calculations within Appendix C notes that mode ling for all residential receptor age bins, workers , and schoolchi ld were averaged over a 70 year time period. OEllliA.'s 2015 Guidance Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-72

7.12 cont'd

7.13 7.14
Page6of 16
Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments 4 state that, ''togethe r, the 9-, 30-, and 70~year cancer risk calculations provide a useful presentation of cancer risk and the relationship to dmation of residency and, thus, exposure to a facility ' s emissions. " The EIR must be revised to include modeling scenarios for the 9-, 30-, and 70-year cancer risk calculations in order to provide a useful presentation of cancer risk in accordance with the guidelines utilized for modeling . Additionall y, the 16-70 age bin for sensitive receptors must be modeled as well

5.3 Biological Resources
According to the Burrowing Owl Focused Swvey Report v.rithin Appendix D - Biological lksources , the focused surveys were conducted on April 24, ~ y 7, May 2 1, and June 5, 2020.

The report notes that "the majority of the site is densel y vegetated following high levels of late spring precipitation, resulting in minimal open areas and limited line-of-sight opportunities ." However, the report does not indicate whether rain had occurred \"ithin five days of each survey.

The Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area5 state that " absence of burro-wing owl s ign cannot be used to confirm absence of the species if the focused burrow survey is conducted within 5 days of rain..» The EIR. must be revised to indicate whether rain wa.s present within 5 days of each survey.

Further , the report notes that "several small mammal bmro ws that have the potential to provide suitable burrowing owl nesting habitat (>4 inches in diameter) were observed scattered throughout the project site during the surveys." Th.e Burrowing Ov.•l Survey Instructions require that the " location of all suitable burrowing owl habitat, potential owl burro ws, burrowing owl sign, and any owls observed should be recorded and mapped , including GPS coordinates .'"' The EIR does not include maps or photographs of this data and must be revised to include this information in order to provide an accurate and adequate analysis in compliance with the Burro wing Owl Survey Instructions .

7.15 {

5.SEnergy
The State of California lists two approved compliance modeling ~ 6 for non-residential buildings: CBECC-Com and ~ ~ is not listed as an approved software. The • OEHHA 2015 Guidance Manual for Preparation ofHealth Risk Assessments bttps://oehha.ca.20,·/ media/downloadi;/crm/2015guidancemanua1-pdf
> https://wv.·w.wrc-rca.org/wec;ies/stll\·ey protocols/bWTollrin!!'. owl survev iru:tructions.pdf 6 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Approved Computer Compliance Programs, California Energy Commission. https://v,.rv,.rw.ener:gy.ca.goy/programs-,and-tgpics/program:s/building-energy­ efficiency-standards/20 19-building-energy-efficiency-2 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-73

7.15 cont'd

7.16 7.17
RVA

modeling provided in the EIR. does not comply with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and under repo.rts the project's potentially significant GHG and Energy impacts to the public and decision make.rs. Since the EIR. did not accurately or adequately model the Energy impacts in compliance with Title 24, a finding of significance must be made. A revised EIR with modeling in one of the two approved software types must be circulated for public review in order to adequately analyze the project's potentially significant environmental impacts. This is vital as the EIR. utilizes the ~ defaults for construction equipment/operational sources, which is clearly not one of the. approved~

5.7 Greenhou se Gas Emissions
There are discrepancies within the ~ Output Sheets regarding CO2 emissions. The passenger car summ.er analysis determined there v.~11 be 9,581 MTC02e during construction and 8,074 l\lITC02e during project operations; the winter passenger car analysis determined there will be 9,,256 NITCO2e during construction and 7,582 .MTCO2e during project operations. The heavy trucks summer analysis determined there will be 9,581 MTC02e during construction and 26,653 MTCO2e during project operations; the winter heavy trucks analysis determined there will be 9,256 MTCO2e during construction and 26,514 MTCO2.e during project operations.

However, the annual passenger car analysis reduces these emissions to 638 MTCO2e during construction and 3,047 MTCO2e during project operations. The heavy trucks annual analysis reduces these emissions to 638 MTCO2e during construction and 6,162 i\ITC02e during project operations. The annual analysis has reduced the heavy trucks seasonal scenarios by approximately 75% to achieve the. annual operational MTCO2e. There is no explanation for the reductions given or the manner in which the reductions were achieved. These reductions serve to skew emissions do1wnwards, specifically below the SCAQI\ID 10,000 MTCO2e significance threshold for industrial projects. Additionally, modeling errors such as those noted in the Energy, Air Quality, and Transportation discussions must be corrected in order to adequately analyze the project's GHG emissions. The EIR. must be revised to present this for analysis and include a fmdiog of significance.

5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The proposed project site is within March Air Reserve Base (MARB)llnland Port Airport Compatibility Zone CL The EIR. states that "the FAA staff has reviewed project infonnation under the provisions of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 7 7 for Buildings A and Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-74

7.17 cont'd

7.18

B and issued determinations of No Hazard to Air Navigation based on the following building heights: Building A, -..,vith 1596 feet site elevation (SE), 45 feet above ground level (AGL) and 1641 feet above mean sea level (Al\i!SL); and Building B, with 1609 feet SE, 45 feet AGL, and 1654 AMSL. Thus , potential impacts would be less than significant" However, the EIR does not include the FAA detennination reports as part of the EIR.. CEQA § 15150 (f) states that incorporation by reference is most appropria te for including long, descriptive, or technical materials that provide general background but do not contribute directly to the analysis of the problem at hand, The FAA determination reports contribute directly to the analysis of the problem at hand. Not including the FAA determination reports as an attachment for public review is in violation ofCEQA § 15150 (f). The EIR. must be revised and recirculated for public review including the FAA determination reports. This is especially vital as the building elevations provided in Figures 3.0-14A and B do not include pertinent information such as the overall height of each building which would assist the public and decision makers in determining compliance with these requirements.

5. IO Land Use and Plannin g
Appenrux B and the EIR. list relevant Policies for consistenc y analysis from the ~ Riverside General Plan. However, neither analysis includes Policies AQ-1. l and AQ-1.2 related to Environmental Justice:

Policy AQ- 1.1: Ensure that all land use decisions, including enforcement actions, are made in an equitable fashion to protect residents, regardless of age, culture , ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.

Policy AQ-1.2: Consider potential environmental justice issues in reviewing impacts (including cumulative impacts for each project proposed ).

The EIR must be revised to include analysis of environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts , including cumulati ve impacts from the proposed project This is especiall y significan t as the surrounding community is highly burdened by pollution, as noted in the Air Quality discuss ion above.

7.19 Sycamore Canyon Bowevard and i·\lessandro Boulevard, which the EIR. has not considered as a -u
urtber, the Transportation analysis concludes the project will result in an LOS deficiency at Land Use and Planning impact in conflict with the City 's General Plan or other guidelines. The RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-75

7.19 cont 'd

7.20 7-21
RVA
Page9of 16
EIR must be revised to include an analysis of the project's impact in relation to the following General Plan policies:

Policy CCM-2.3: Maintain LOS D or better on Arterial Streets wherever possible. At key locations , such as City Arterials that are used by regional freeway bypass traffic and at heavily traveled free·way interchanges, allow LOS E at peak hours as the acceptab le standard o.n a case­ by-case basis.

Policy CCM-2.4: Minimize the occurrence of streets operating at LOS F by building out the planned street network and by integrating land use and transportation in accordance with the General Plan principles .

The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Busines s/Office Parle (B/OP), a Zoning designation of Business/Manufacturing Parle - Specific Plan Overlay (BMP-SP), and an Industrial (I) designation within the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan. The B/OP General Plan designation provides for "light :industrial and small warehouse uses (up to 10,000 square feet per site)7." A conflict exists bet\.veen the quantity of warehousing allowed by the site' s General Plan designation and the quantity allowed by the Zoning designation and Specific Plan . A General Plan Amendment to the Industrial Land Use designation which provides for larger warehousin g/distribution uses is required for the proposed project to proceed. This information is not disclosed or analyzed anywhere throughout the EIR The Land Use and Planning section does not provide a description of the B/OP Land Use designation. A revised EIR must be prepared which includes this information and pro"ides an accurate , adequate analysis of the proposed project 's inconsistenc y with the existing General Plan Land Use designation.

The EIR provides a list of the required entitlements and discretionary actions necessaiy for the proposed project to proceed . The EIR states that a Minor Conditional Use Permit is required pursuant to Riverside Municipal Code Section 19.150.020 - Base Zones Permitted Land Usess for Business and Manufacturing Parle (BMP) Zone . H owever, Section 19.150.020 notes that a 7 Riverside General Plan 2025 - Land Use and Uroan Design Element https: //riversideca. !!ov/oedd/sites/ ri,;;ei:side.ca.&QN,,ced4/files/pdfi'planniw!!:eneral-plan/ 04 umd Use and Urban Desim Element wi1h%20maps%20COMPLE1E %20AUGUST %202 019.pdf s Riverside Municipal Code Section 19 .150.020 https ://library .municode. comf calri\·ersid e/codes / G'loo. .et.Qijijooooo:e
nodeld=PTIICOOR TIT19ZO ARTVBAZORE USDEPR CH19.150BAZOPELA US 19.150.020PELA us
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-76
Page l0of 16
Conditional Use Permit is required for any warehouse/distribution facility in tbe BMP Zon.e that exceeds 100,000 square feet (sf)_ The project proposes 603)00 sf of warehousing/distribution 7_21 facilities; therefore, a CUP is required instead of a Minor CUP. The EIR is inadequate as an cont 'd informational document and does not provide an accurate list or analysis of required discretionary actions (CEQA § 15121).

Additionally, the EIR has not provided any consistency analysis with the goals SCAG's 2020- 2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS9• Due to errors in modeling, such as excluding haul truck trips and other issues as noted in the Air Quality/G!-eenhouse Gas/Energy discussions above and the project's significant and unavoidable VMI impacts, the proposed project has ~ potential for inconsistency u.ith Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 7 .22 6 to support healthy and equitable communities, and Goal 7 to adapt to a changing climate. Also as noted in the GHG discussion, the summer/v.;w_ter GHG analyses exceed the GHG emissions thresholds, resulting in a significant impact The EIR. must be revised to include accurate Air Quality/HRA, Energy, and GHG modeling and discussion of significant and unavoidable Transportation/VMT impacts in order to accurately analyze potential consistency or inconsistency with SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS document.

7.23 5.12 Transportation
The study area for the EIR is arbitrary and capricious in that it does not include for analysis all potentially significant impacts on the transportation facilities providing access to the site. The EIR only analyzes eight intersections, two of which are proposed future driveways for the site.

The EIR must be revised and circulated for public review to include analysis of the following transportation facilities providing direct access to the project site:

Intersections
Alessandro Blvd. at Mission Grove Pkwy.

Alessandro Blvd. at Canyon Crest Dr.

Alessandro Blvd. at Chicago AveJArlington Ave.

Alessandro Blvd./Ceotral Ave. at Victoria Ave.

Freeway Merge/Diverge
1-215 at SR-60
1-215 at SR-91
~ SCAG 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS https:J/scag.ca_gm·/read-plan-ado_pted.final-plan RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-77

7.23 cont'd

7.24 RVA
1-215 aU-10
1-215 at SR-210
1-215 atl-15
Freeway On/Off Ramps
SR-91 at Central Ave.

SR-91 at Arlington Ave.
1-215 at Cactus Ave.
1-215 at Eucalyptus Ave.JEastridge Ave.

This is especially vital for analysis since Exlul>it 4-1 Project (Passenger Car) Trip Distribution within Appendix L - Traffic and VMT Analysis depicts 20% of passenger car trips beading westbound on Alessandro Blvd. towards Mission Grove Pkwy and 5% of passenger car trips heading southbound on Sycamore Canyon Blvd./Meridian Pk\vy. Additionally, the I-215 provides direct access to the project site from the Southern California Logistics Airport The project objectives also include developing and operating warehouse buildings that "are in close proximi ty to March Inland Pon, State Route 60/lnterstate 215, and Interstate 10 to support the distribution of goods throughout the region." A revised EIR must be prepared that includes analysis of all transportation facilities providing direct access to the project site.

The EIR chooses to model the project as a high-cube transload short-term warehouse because the ITE defines this type of warehouse as the lowest trip generation per 1,000 sf of all industrial land uses (0.10 trips per 1,000 sf)10. The ITE 2020 10th Edition Manual Supplement also reduced the total percentage of buck trips for high-cube transload short-term \vareb.ouses to 16% of a111rips generated by the project ll. Modeling the proposed project as high-cube transload short-tenn warehouse serves to skew analysis do"1mvard and present unduly low emissions estimates and VMf. The Project Description includes operational and characteristic information about the project that indicate it is likely to be used as a fulfillment center based on SCAQMD ' s High­ Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Aoalysisll_ The proposed project encompasses more characteristics of a fulfilhnent center \¥a.rehouse type which generates higher emissions and 10 Institute of Transportation Engineers Common Trip Generation Rates (PM Peak Hour) https:// w,vw. troutdaleoregon.go,;/sites/default/files/fileattachments/public works/page/966/ ite land use list 10th edition. pelf
11 ITE 10th Edition Manual Supplement https:/fam,--w.nxtbook..oomfygsreprintslTIDITE :Marnh2020/ w!ey PQP'?,m~ l 4
tl SCAQMD High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis httpsJ/www.ite.org1pubr? id=a3e6679a%2De3a8%2Dbt38%2D7t29%2D296lbecdd498
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-78

7.24 cont 'd

7.25 7.26

W..IT, such as high levels of on-site automation and logistics management, handling products prior to their distn"bution to retail locations or other warehouses , and interior ceiling heights of 40 feet in order to accommodate mezzanines . The EIR must be revised to model the project accuratel y as ITE Land Use 155 High-cube Fulfillment Center Warehouse in accordance with planned operations as detailed in the Project Description in order for the EIR to be a reliable informational document
The EIR concludes that the LOS deficiency at Sycamore Canyon Boulevard and Alessandro Boulevard is unavoidable but not significant as a traffic impact. However , it has not been considered as a Land Use and Planning impact in conflict with the City' s General Plan or other guidelines . The EIR must be revised to include an analysis of the project' s impact in relation to the following General Plan policies:

Policy CCM-2.3 : Maintain LOS D or better on Arterial Streets wherever possible. At key locations , ruch as City Arterials that are used by regional freeway bypass traffic and at heavily traveled freeway interchanges , allow LOS E at peak: hours as th.e acceptab le standard on a case­ by-case basis.

Policy CCM-2 .4: Minimize the occurrence of streets operating at LOS F by building out the planned street network and by integrating land use and transportation in accordance with the General Plan principles.

6.0 Other CEQA Topics

6.2 Consistency with Regional Pl.ans
The EIR concludes that the project is consisten t with the General Plan Land use designation of Busines s.lOffice Park (B/OP). However, as noted above, there is no discussion or analysis regarding the B/OP designation. The B/OP General Plan designation provides for "light industri al and small warehouse uses (up to 10,000 square feet per site)B_" A co.nflict exists between the quantity of warehousing allowed by the site's General Plan designation and the quantity allowed by the Zoning designation and Specific Plan. A General Plan Amendment to the Industrial Land Use designation which provides for larger warehousing/distribution uses is required for the proposed project to proceed. This information is not disclosed or analyzed tl Rinfiide General Plan 2025 - Land Use and Urban Design Element https://riversideca.!l'ov/cedd/sites/ ri;CW,ideca.gp1'.,c,edd/fileslpd£1planning/2:eneral-plan/ ~ Land Use and Urban Desilm Element with%20maps%20CO:MPLE1E%20AUGUST%202019 .pdf RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-79

7 26
de~ption of_the B/OP Land Use designation.. A revised EIR must be prepared which includ~s {
anywhere throughout the EIR. The Land Use and Planning section does not provide a · 1, this mfonnatton and provides an accurate, adequate analysts of the proposed proJect"s con

7.27 7.28
RVA
inconsisten .cy with the existing General Plan Land Use designation.

Additionally, the EIR concludes that the project is consistent with SCAG 's Connect SoCal and refers to discussion in Section 5.12 - Transportation for analysis . Howe ver, Section 5.12 does not include VMf discussion for analysis in relation to consistency analysis with Connect SoCaL The Transportation analysis concludes the project will have a significant and unavoidable impact regarding VMT impacts. The proposed project has ~ potential for inconsistenc y with Connect SoCal's Goal 5 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality, Goal 6 to suppo rt healthy and equitable communities, and Goal 7 to adapt to a chang ing climate as a result of the VMT impacts . The EIR must be revised to include this analysis for discuss ion regarding Connect SoCal. Additionally , no other analysis regarding consistency with Connect SoCal is given throughout the EIR. 0th.er than in the Transportation Analysis. The revised EIR must include a consistency analysis .vith Connect SoCal for all portions of environmental analysis.

6.4 Growth Inducing Impacts
Toe EIR utilizes misleading and uncertain language in concluding that the project will n.ot have growth inducing population impacts . The EIR. states that "the employment opportunities anticipated to be gene-rated by the Project are relatively minor and within the Southern California Associa tion of Governments (SCAG) population, housing, and employment forecasts ." As noted in the Population and Housing discussion below, SCAG's Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast 14 notes that the City will add 43,300 Jobs between 2016 - 2045. The ElR's calculation of 586 employees is actually 1.3% of the City ' s employment growth from 2016 - 2045. Utilizing SCAG 's Employment Density Study l5 calculation of 1,046 employees, the project represents 2.4% of the City 's employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accounting for more than 1 % of the projected employment grov.rth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. Th.e EIR must be revised to includes this analysis , and also provide a cumulative analysis d iscussion of projects approved since 2016 and projects "in the pipeline" to determine if the project will exceed the SCAG' s employment growth forecast for the 14 SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https:// sca!!.ca.gov/sites/mainlfiles/file-attachmentsf0903foonnectsocal demographics-and-gro\"11-th-forecast.pdf? 1606001579
15 SCAG Employmeni Demrty Study http://www.mwcog_o:rg/file.aspx? A=-OTTITR24POOOlllw5mPNzK8F4d8djdJe4LF9Exj61XOU%3D
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-80

7.28 on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate {
City. AdditionaJly, the revised EIR. must also provide demographic and geographic information cont'd environmental anaJysis.

7.29 7.30

7.31 7.0 Environmental Effects Found Not Significant

7.1.1 Agriculture and Fores try Resources
The California Important Farmland Finder identifies the site as Farmland of Local Importance.

The EIR excludes this information for analysis. A revised EIR must be prepared which discloses and anaJyzes this information.

7.1. 7 Populmion and Housing
The EIR utilizes uncertain and misleading language which does not provide any meaningful analysis of the project's construction employment generation. For example, the EIR. concludes that, "given the availability of labor in the Riverside County and San Bernardino County region, and the southern California region as a whole, it is reasonable to assume that the construction of the Project will be completed by existing companies already doing business in the area with employees already residing in the area. Thus, construction-related growth inducement would not result :from implementation of the Project." In order to comply with CEQA's requirements for meaningful disclosure, the EIR must provide an accurate estimate of construction employees generated by the proposed project It must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions. Additionally, an estimate of the number of workers relocating to the City as a result of the project should be provided utilizing existing housing vacancy rates in the City. Relying on the entire labor force of the SCAG region to fill the project's construction jobs will increase VNIT and emissions during all phases of construction and each portion of the EIR. must be revised to account for longer construction worker trip distances.

The EIR provides a calculation of the employees generated by the proposed project based oo the County of Riverside's General Plan Appendix E-2: Socioeconomic Build-Out Assumptions and Methodology which includes a square foot per e.mploye.e factor of 1,030 square feet per employee for Light Industrial land uses. Based on this factor, the EIR calculates the project will generate 586 employees. However, the EIR excludes the proposed office areas from the employment calculation. The project description states that each of the proposed buildings \vill include 10,000 sf of office space for a project total of 20,000 sf of office. The County's RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-81
731
cont 'd
RVA

Appendix E-2 includes a square foot per employee factor of 300 square feet per employee for Office land uses.

Applying these ratios results in the following calculation:

Office : 20,000 sf I 300 = 21
Warehouse : 583,100 sf / 1,030 = 567
Total: 634 employees
It must also be noted that utilizing the County of Riverside's General Plan as the methodology for employment calculation is not an appropriate source. The Introduction section of County 's General Planl6 states that "The General Plan covers the entire unincorporated portion of the County of Riverside." It is not intended to be applied to the incorporated cities within the County.

SCAG's Employment Density Study17 provides a technical analysis and average of c.ounty-wide parcels with.in the SCAG region for ten land use categories. The SCAG study is an appropriate source for employment calculation as it is meant to be applied as county-i..,iide average, unlike the Riverside County General Plan which is applicable only to the unincorporated areas of the county. The SCAG study in.eludes the following applicab le employment generation rates for Riverside County:

Warehouse: l employee per 581 square feet
Office: 1 employee per 481 square feet
Applying these ratio.s results in tb.e following calculation:

Warehouse: 583,100 sf/ 581 = 1,004
Office : 20,000 sf/ 481 sf= 42
Total: 1,046 employees
16 County ofRiveis ide General Plan, Introduction. 4tms://planoing rctlm aor!! /Portals/ 14/genplan/ 2eneral Plan 2017/elemen ts/OCT17/Ch01 Intro 1208 15.pdf ?,,;er-201 7-10-11-10 2103-380 17 SCAG Employment Density Study http ://www.mwco g.org/ftle.aspx? A=QTilTR24POOOIBwSmPNzK8F4d8djd.Je4LF9Exj61XOU%3D
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-82

731
cont'd

7.32

Utilizing SCAG's Employment Density Study ratios, the proposed project will generate 1,04{i employees. The EIR concludes that its calculation of 586 employees generated by the project represents 03 percent of the expected opportunities within the City by 2045. SCAG's Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast18 notes that the City will add 43,300 jobs between 2016 - 2045. The EIR's calculation of 586 employees is actually 1.3% of the City's employment growth from 2016 - 2045. Utilizing SCAG's Employment Density Study calculation of 1,04{i employees, the project represents 2.4% of the City's employment growth from 2016 - 2045. A single project accouoting for more than 1 % of the projected employment growth over 29 years represents a significant amowit of growth. The EIR must be revised to includes this analysis, and also provide a cumu1ative analysis discussion of projects approved since 2016 and prnj ects " in the pipeline" to determine i.fthe project will exceed the SCAG's employment growth forecast for the City. Additionally, the revised BR must aJso provide demographic and geographic information on the Joc.ation of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide an accurate environmental analysis.

Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, GSEJA believes the EIR is flawed and a revised £IR must be prepared for the proposed project and circulated for public review. Golden State Envirorunerital Justice Alliance requests to be added to th.e public interest list regarding any subsequent environmental documents, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination for this project. Send all communications to Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance P .0. Box 79222 Corona, CA 92877.

Sincerely,
Board of Directors
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance
,s SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast adopted September 3, 2020 https :// scag.ca.gov/sites/main lfilesffile-attacbmen ts.f0903foonnectsocal demographics -and-grmlith-forecast.pdf? 1606001579
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-83
Letter 7 – Gol den State Environmental Justice Alliance Commenter: Board of Directors
Date: July 16, 2021
Response 7.1:

The commenter requests the City consider the comments provided and to add Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance to the City’s public interest list for all environmental documents.

The comment letter is being considered by the City as it is a part of thi s Final EIR and every individual comment within the letter provided a written response. The City has also added Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance to the City’s master list for CEQA noticing with the address provided.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.2:

The commenter provides his own summary of project description details contained in the DEIR.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.3:

The commenter asserts that there is a conflict between the quantity of warehousing allowed by the site’s General Plan designation and the quantity allowed by the Zoning designation and Specific Plan, and that a General Plan Amendment to the Industrial Land Use designation which provides for larger warehousing/distribution uses is required for the proposed Project to proceed.

The commenter also states that a description of the B/OP Land use designation is not provided in the DEIR.

As outlined in the DEIR, Section 3.0 Project Description (DEIR, pp.3.0-13 – 3.0-14), “The City of Riverside General Plan 2025 (GP 2025) land use designation for the Project site is Business/ Office Park (B/OP), Figure 3.0-5 Land Use Designation Map. The Project site is zoned BMP -SP – Business and Manufacturing Park and Specific Plan (Sycamore Canyon Business Park) Overlay Zones, Figure 3.0-6 - Zoning Map. The Project site is within the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan (SCBPSP), which is considered a “Major Business Park” as shown on Figure LU-4 of the GP 2025. The SCBPSP designation for the Project site is Industrial, Figure 3.0 -7.” The DEIR further indicates “development of the Project site is guided by the SCBPSP, which was adopted in 1984 by the City to encourage and provide incentives for economic development in the 1,400-acre planning area. The SCBPSP designates the Project site land use as ‘Industrial.’ RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-84
Although the Project site is desi gnated as Business/ Office Park (B/OP) in the GP 2025, properties within the SCBPSP are governed by the Development Standards and Criteria in the SCBPSP.

GP 2 025 includes Objective LU- 30, “Establish Riverside’s neighborhoods as the fundamental building blocks of the overall community, utilizing Neighborhood and Specific Plans to provide a more detailed design and policy direction for development projects located in particular neighborhoods. Implementing Objective LU-30 is Policy LU-30.9, “Interpret, apply or impose the development restrictions, conditions and/or standards of an approved Specific Plan in addition to those found in this General Plan.” The SCBPSP is such an approved Specific Plan that provides more detailed design and policy direction for projects located within its boundaries. Thus, although the Project is located in an area designated under the GP 2025 as Business/Office Park (B/OP), it is the l and use designation and zoning in the SCBPSP that governs the type of developments allowed and the Development Standards and Criteria, such as size, height, setbacks, etc.

As outlined in the SCBPSP, Section 1.4 Legislative Context, “When adopted, the Spec ific Plan has the same effect as the local General Plan. The Council is required (by the Subdivision Map Act) to deny approval of any tentative or final subdivision which is inconsistent with the Specific Plan (Government Code Section 66474(b)).” (SCBPSP, p. 4) The Project is not required to be consistent with the GP 2025 Land Use Designation, but rather the land use and zoning in the SCBPSP, which is Industrial and allows for distribution and warehousing, without a limitation on the square footage of the use. As the Project does not need to demonstrate consistency with the land use designation B/OP, the DEIR need not provide a description of that designation, and it would be extraneous information. The DEIR demonstrates the Project’s consistency with the SCBPSP as outlined in the DEIR, Section 5.10 Land Use and Planning, (DEIR, p. 5.10-27) “The Project site is designated as Industrial in the SCBPSP, which allows warehouse uses.

Further, per the City’s Zoning Map, the Project site is within the BMP - SP – Business and Manufacturing Park and Specific Plan (Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan) Overlay Zones. The BMP zone is one of four industrial zones within the City.” (DEIR, p. 5.1- 18) As provided in Section 19.220.020 of the Riverside Municipal Code, “For those properties where the Specific Plan Overlay Zone is applied, all permitted use restrictions, development standards, and other applicable standards or regulations governing development as contained within the adopted specific plan shall apply. To the extent that the specific plan does not enumerate use restrictions, development standards, or other applicable regulations, the standards associated with the underlying base zone shall apply. In the event that provisions of the adopted specific plan conflict with or do not correspond with the provisions of the underlying base zone, the provisions as contained in the adopted specific plan shall apply and supersede the underlying base zone requirements, with the exception of marijuana-related uses which shall be exclusively regulated by the underlying zone and are specifically prohibited.” The Project has been reviewed for compliance with the SCBPSP, in particular the permitted uses, lot standards, setback standards, parking standards, outdoor storage and loading areas, lighting and utilities, sign standards, display medians, screening of mechanical equipment, trash collection areas, walls/fence standards, and rail service standards and has been found to be generally in compliance with the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan standards as set forth in RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-85
Section 3.0 Development Standards and Criteria as modified by Resolution 23240 adopted Nov
ember 7, 2012. Appendix B summarized the Project’s consistency with SCBPSP policies.” This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.4:

The commenter asserts that as the P roject propose s 603,100 square feet of warehouse/distribution facilities and therefore a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required, not a Minor Conditional Use Permit (MCUP), and the EIR, therefore, does not provide an accurate list or analysis of required discretionary actions.

The DEIR correctly identifies the required discretionary actions, including the Minor Conditional Use Permit. As noted in Response 7.3, the Project is located in the BMP - SP – Business and Manufacturing Park and Specific Plan (Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan) Overlay Zones. Section 19.150. 020 currently provides that a CUP is required for warehouses over 100,000 square feet in the BMP base zone. However, the Project is subject to the zoning regulations in place at the time the Project was deemed complete, which required a MCUP, rather than a CUP as stated by the commenter.

As identified in the DEIR, Section 5.2 Air Quality, Subsection 5.2.2.4 Local Regulations, “The City adopted Good Neighbor Guidelines for Siting New and/or Modified Warehouse/Distribution Facilities (GNG) in October 2008 to focus on the relationship between land use, permitting and air quality. ...On November 10, 2020 the Riverside City Council adopted updates to the GNG, in addition to associated amendment to Title 19 – Zoning Code of the Riverside Municipal Code (RMC), the Hunter Business Park Specific Plan, and the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Specific Plan related to siting industrial uses in the City when located adjacent to sensitive receptors, including residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, playgrounds, da y care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and other public spaces. City Council action also allowed any project achieving substantial completion within 90 days of the effective date of the implementing ordinance to continue to be subject to the 2008 GNG. As this Project was deemed complete prior to adoption of the updated GNG (discussed further in Section 8.2.5), it does not need to comply with the updated GNG.” (DEIR, pp. 5.2-18 – 5.2-19)
As outlined above, the 2020 update to the GNG also included associated amendments to Title 19 – Zoning Code of the RMC, Section 19.150, Table 19.150.020.A Permitted Uses Table, which included changing the requirement for a MCUP to CUP for warehouse & distribution facilities 100,000 square foot or greater. As the Project was deemed complete prior to adoption of the updated GNG and Title 19 – Zoning Code, it does not need to comply with the updated GNG, or this change to the Zoning Code. A copy of Table 19.150.020.A in effect at the time the Project was deemed complete is listed below. As illustrated, a MCUP is required for warehouse and distribution centers greater than 400,000 square feet. Therefore, a MCUP is required for the Project and correctly identified and analyzed in the DEIR. The City has consistently applied this RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-86
interpretation to other projects that have been deemed complete prior to adoption of the updated GN
G and Zoning Code. The DEIR also specifically discloses that the applicable discretionary actions and approval are based on the requirements of the RMC at the time the Project was deemed substantially complete (November 2020). (DEIR, pp. 1.0-2, 3.0-19.) The DEIR thus does not fail as an informational document and provides an accurate list of the necessary entitlements and discretionary actions for the Project.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.5:

The commenter claims that the DEIR does not describe the mechanism or legal instrument by which the proposed modifications to the existing 11.6-acre Restricted Property will be completed and that the Project cannot proceed without approval of the modifications to the Restricted Property.

As outlined in the DEIR , Section 3.0 Project Description, subsection 3.1.2 Project Site Background, “Construction of the Grove Community Church at the off -site 19900 Grove Community Drive location had impacts to a jurisdictional drainage and associated riparian habitat at that location. To mitigate for impacts from construction of the church at the off-site location, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers required that the on-site jurisdictional drainage and riparian habitat along Alessandro Boulevard be set aside and preserved in a legally designated “Restricted Property,” as a condition of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit that was issued for the construction of the church. The “Restricted Property” was recorded in 2009.” (DEIR, p. 3.0-11) .. lonos
Std<!nu.M ZOMS Office & Commero;a1 loots
~~~ C<H'l~.M;•on IIK). Rf'Sfdf('lt!.ll ~1CU'tura•{RA-(Off1Ce. comn-.erc,.tl R«•il.. i Rur ~ Residenl:i.ll (RRJ. RKiditnoal fsut• (Ft:~ Smg'e COOVT'lifci-' c;,ene,r~, (on,mefC'i l .;m,ty Res.Kltc1t~ R~ Centet'}
R 1~ Muhiplof.Mndy ftes•denn.J! (R 3 <llnd RA))
RE 3 R4
I
0 CR
arehousing &
holesale
Distribution Centers:
400,000 sq. ft.
r less
Greater than
00,000 sq. ft.

Ml)'.od use loot5
N«.:l•t,o,hood..Olfal•
I
P • PmMted C • SUbjKt to the gr.l"Mg of a c~.uoMI use perm t (CUP).~Qlli:
lU~
RCP Recycling Clf'Ker Pt1miL Ch.peer 11 '.VO- TUP Tempor~ Use Perm.I-0:W,JQf 19 740 ~ .fl• SQU<f,e~
PRO • Pla.nn@d R~,d".n1,al 0@<¥elopment P...-m,t.Lbi~
0C.llt0n of
Rfqu11ed
'.\t <llndJl'lk 1n the
MC ., SubJffl to the gr,ntio,g of 1-~nor Cond1t10NI list Permit (MCUP) cti.,pte,~J.lO
X Prohib ted
sP • S.teP"oRevt~P~IYll't . ONR.l~lO
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-87
The DEIR r equires that the Restricted Property be revised as part of a biological mitigation measure, DEIR, Section 5.3 Biological Resources, Subsection 5.3.6 Proposed Mitigation Measures (DEIR, p. 5.3-53) as follows:

Therefore, as outlined above in MM BIO- 6 (DEIR, p. 5.3 -53), the DEIR indicates that the Restricted Property will need to be revised. As outlined above, as the designation of the Restricted Property was required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a condition of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permit that was issued for the construction of the church, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would need to concur with the Restricted Covenant Amendment. The legal mechanism for revising the Restricted Property is an amendment to the Restrictive Covenant, to which the March JPA is signatory. Therefore, the DEIR did identify that a revision to the Restricted Property, would be required as a part of the proposed Project as outlined in Mitigation Measure MM BIO-6, DEIR pages 1.0-10, 5.1-17, 5.3-53, and 5.7-27, and was analyzed as part of the Project’s potential impacts in the DEIR . The applicant has submitted an Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for review and concurrence. To provide further clarity, the DEIR Project Description, Section 3.4 is revised to identify that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers would need to concur with the Restrictive Covenant Amendment. T he DEIR would be revised as follows:

Section 3.4 Discretionary Actions and Approvals pp. 3.0-42-3.0-43 changes as follows:

March Joint Powers Authority
• Restrictive Covenant Amendment
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Section 404 Permit for Disposal of Dredge or Fill Material per the Clean Water Act
• Concurrence with Restrictive Covenant Amendment
MM BIO-6: Prior to issuance of occupancy permit, in order to reduce impacts to on-site Riparian/Riverine areas and suitable habitat for LBVI, on-site mitiga tion shall include:

1. Enhancement of a total of 1.58 acres of riparian habitat: 0.01 acre in Drainages A, 1.34 acres in B, and 0.23 acre in Area C.

2. Create (establish) 0.61 acre of in-kind riparian woodland in Area C

3. Restoration of 0.02 acre of riparian habitat in Drainage B.

4. The non-jurisdictiona l, non- riparian/riverine upland areas of slopes associated with the access road will be restored! replanted with native seed mix.

5. The roadway/access to Parcel 1/ Building A shall include culverts to provide a hydrological connectio n to the riparian habitat on the east side of the roadway and a corridor for small wildlife species.

6. Revise the existing Restricted Property to include Parcel A (7.19 acres) and Parcel B (5.04 acres) , with a combined area of 12.23 acres. The revised 12.23 Restricted Property shall be managed in perpetuity with an endowment funded by the developer and by a CDFW approved 3rd party (such as Rivers and Lands Conservancy "RLC").

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-88

As
the DEIR did identify that a revision to the Restricted Property would be required as part of the proposed Project and was analyzed as part of the Project’s potential impacts these revisions only provide clarity and no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result.

Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.6:

The commenter states that the DEIR does not include a floor plan for either of the buildings and states that the basic components of a Planning Application include a site plan, floor plan, conceptual grading plan, and elevations and that Figures 3.0-9 and 3.0-14 A and B do not provide detailed information such as parcel size, site coverage or building height. The commenter further claims that the DEIR has excluded the proposed floor plans and detailed site plan/elevations from public review, which does not comply with CEQA’s requirement for adequate informational documents and meaningful disclosure.

The commenters reference to the CEQA Statute (Section 21003(b)) and Guidelines (Section 15121) does pertain to the document requirements pursuant to CEQA, but not to the Project Description requirements of CEQA as shown below.

CEQA Statute Section 21003 (b):

CEQA Guidelines Section 15121:
§ 21003. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES; DOCUMENTS; REPORTS; DATA BASE; ADMINISTRATION OF PROCESS
The Legislature fu1ther finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that:
(a) Local agencies integrate U1e requirements of Utis division wiili planning and environmental review procedures othe1wise required by law or by local practice so that all th-ose procedures , to the maximum feasible extent, run concurn::ntly, rather than consecutively. (b) Docum ents prepared pursuant to this division be organized and written in a manner that will be meaningfu l and usefu l to decision makers and to the public .

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-89

Rat
her, the required contents of a Project Description, as part of the contents of an EIR, are identified in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, as follows:

The DEIR included a Project Description, in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, as specifically outlined below:

Section 15124 (a): the precise location and boundaries of the Project are shown on detailed maps including Figure 3.0-2 – Vicinity Map, which contains the project site boundary on a topographic map, the site plan outline and project boundary on an aerial photograph in Figure 3.0- 3, as well as a regional map, Figure 3.0-1 – Regional Map.
15121. INFORMATIONAL DOCUMENT
(a) An ElR is an informational document which will inform public agency decision makers and the public generally of the significa nt environmenta l effect of a project, identify possib le ways to minimize the significa nt effec ts, and descr ibe reaso nabl e a lternatives to the project. The public agency shall consider the information in the ElR along with other information which may be presented to the agency.
(b) Whi le the information in the EIR does not control the agency's ultimate discretion on the project , the agency must r espo nd to each signi ricant effec t idenl iried in the ETR by making findings under Sect ion 15091 and if necessaiy by making a statement of oveITiding cons idera tion under Section 15093.
(c) The information in an EIR may constitute substant ial evidence in the record to suppo1t the agency 's actio n on the project if its decision is later chall enged in cou1t. 15124. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The desc ription of the project shall contain the following infonnation but should not suppl y extensive detai l beyond that needed for evaluation and review of the environmental impact. (a) The precise location and boundaries of the proposed project shall be shown on a deta iled map , preferably topographic. The location of the project shall also appear on a regional map. (b) A statement of the objectives sought by the propo sed project. A clearly written statement of objectives will help the lead agency develop a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate in the EIR and will aid the decision makeJs in preparing findings or a stateme nt of oveni.d.ing considerations. if necessary . The statement of objectives should include the underl ying purpose of the project and may discuss the project benefits .
(c) A genera l descr:iption of the project's technical. econo mic, and environmenta l characteristic s, considering the principal engineering proposal s if any and supp01ting public se1vice facilities. (d) A statement b1iefly describing the intended uses of the EIR. (1) This statement shall include. to the extent that the infonuation is kno wn to the Lead Agency ,
(A) A list of the agencies that are expected to use the EIR iu their decision making , and (B) A list of permits and other approva ls required to implement the project. (C) A list of related environmental review and consultation requirement s required by federal . state, or local laws, regulations , or policies. To the fullest extent possible. the lead ageucy should integrate CEQA revie w with these r·elated envirornneutal review and consultation requirement s.
(2) If a public agency must make more than one decision oa1 a project , all its decisions RVA
subject to CEQA should be listed, preferably iu the order in which they will occur. On request, the Office of Plannin g and Research will provide assistance iu identifying state penuits for a project.

Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-90
Section 15124 (b): the statement of objectives is incl uded i n Section 3.0 Project Description, subsection 3.3 Project Objectives (DEIR, pp. 3.0-40 – 3.0-41) Section 15124 (c): a general description of the project’s technical, economic and environmental characteristics is included in the DEIR Section 3.0 Project Description, subsections 3.1.1 Project Site – Existing Conditions (DEIR, p. 3.0-5), 3.1.2 Project Site Background (DEIR, p. 3.0-11), 3.1.3 Land Use and Zoning (DEIR, p. 3.0-13), 3.1.4 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (DEIR, p. 3.0- 14), 3.2.1 Project Ent itlements (DEIR, p. 3.0 -19), 3.2.2 Design and Appearance (DEIR, p. 3.0 - 27), 3.2.3 Infrastructure and Utilities (DEIR, p. 3.0-36), 3.2.4 Sustainability Features (DEIR, p. 3.0- 38), 3.2.5 Operations and Employment (DEIR, p. 3.0- 40), 3.2.6 Construction and Operation (DEIR, p. 3.0-41). The project description also contains the site map (Figure 3.0-9) and Elevations for both buildings (Figure 3.0-14A – Elevations Building A and Figure 3.0-14B Elevation Building B), as well as a Fencing Plan (Figure 3.0- 11), and Landscaping Design (Figure 3.0- 12A and Figure 3.0-12B). The parcel sizes are shown on the Tentative Parcel Map (Figure 3.0- 8). The building heights and floor area ratio for each of the buildings are identified in Table 3.0-3 Building A and Table 3.0-4 – Building B (DEIR, pp. 3.0-22 – 3.0-23).

Section 15124 (d): (1) the statement of the intended uses of the EIR, including a list of the agencies that are expected to use the EIR in their decision making and a list of permits and other approvals required to implement the project are contained in the DEIR, 3.0 Project Description, subsection 3.4 Discretionary Actions and Other Agency Approvals (DEIR, pp. 3.0 -42 – 3.0-43). (2) All of the City of Riverside’s decisions on the project that are subject to CEQA are listed, in the Project Description, in subsection 3.2.1 Project Entitlements, including the planning case numbers for each (DEIR, pp. 3.0-19 – 3.0-23).

Therefore, as outlined above, the DEIR includes all of the required project informat ion in the Project Description (Section 3.0), pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15124. Nonetheless, the floor plans for Buildings A and B have been provided in the new Appendix O.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.7: The comment states that the air quality analysis did not include surfacing parking spaces or improvements on Parcel C. However, these statements are incorrect. Using ArcGIS and the ArcMap mapping programs along with applicant’s engineer’s CAD drawings of the site plan, it was determined that approximately 21 acres would be paved and of this, approximately 5 acres would be striped parking spaces. This includes all improvements to Parcel C. As shown in Attachment 1 CalEEMod Output of the Air Quality Analysis (Appendix C of the DEIR), these areas were modeled as 5 acres “Parking Lot” and 16 acres “Other Asphalt Surfaces”. As such, the analysis in the DEIR and underlying technical studies is correct and no changes are needed.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-91
This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not pr
ovide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.8:

The commenter states that the CalEEMod output sheets excluded any hauling trips in the analysis. The commenter states it would not be feasible or appropriate for haul trucks to utilize an existing dirt road that crosses through Parcel A to transport excess material between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2.

As stated in Section 6.1 of the Air Quality Analysis (appendix C to the DEIR), “During the grading phase, soil quantities would be balanced on-site between the two building areas with no net import or export.” The modeling assumes that this soil hauling between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 would be done with the modeled grading equipment, which includes graders and scrapers capable of moving large quantities of soil, as part of the overall grading of the Project site. To be conservative and account for the usage of trucks to haul soil from one parcel to the other on existing roadways rather than the on-site dirt road, 40,000 cubic yards of soil hauling has been added to the grading phase with a trip length of one mile. The CalEEMod default number of trucks was modeled. This includes of total of 5,000 hauling trips over the grading period. This number is based on a default truck capacity of 16 cubic yards and two trips per haul (one trip loaded and one returning trip unloaded). The modeled grading equipment (graders and scrapers) were also included in the calculations. The revised emissions are summarized in Tables 6 and 7 of the revised Air Quality Analysis and Table 7 of the revised GHG Analysis. Accordingly, DEIR corresponding Tables 5.2- 6, 5.2-7, and 5.7-7 have been revised as well (see below). All construction emissions would still be less than the applicable thresholds, and air quality and GHG impacts would be less than significant.

Table 5.2-6 – Total Annual Construction Emissions Comparison to General Conformity de Minimis Levels

Construction
Emissions (tons per year)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Year 2021 Emissions (tons/year) 0.35

0.49 3.29

4.59 2.78

3.97 0.01 0.51

0.88 0.25

0.36 Year 2022 Emissions (tons/year) 1.77

3.27 1.61

2.44 1.95

2.84 0.01 0.33

0.62 0.13

0.21 Total Emissions (tons) 2.12

3.76 4.91

7.02 4.73

6.78 0.01

0.02 0.83

1.49 0.38

0.57 Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year) 1.77

3.27 3.29

4.59 2.78

3.94 0.01 0.51

0.88 0.25

0.36 De Minimus Levels 10 10 100 -- 100 70
Exceed Threshold? No No No -- No No

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-92
Table 5.2-7 – Maxi mum Daily Construction Emissions Comparison to SCAQMD Significance Thresholds
Construction Emissions (pounds per day)
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation 4 41 22 <1 910 6
Grading 4 5 46 57 32 33 <1 6 2 4
Building Construction/Architectural Coatings1 32 59 29 45 34 51 <1 6 11 2 4 Paving/Architectural Coatings1 32 58 46 13 34 21 <1 2 1 Maximum Daily Emissions2 32 59 46 57 34 51 <1 9 11 6
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 450 150 55
Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
1The architectural coatings phase of construction was modeled simultaneously with building construction and parking lot paving emissions.
2Emissions were rounded to the nearest whole number, Emissions reported as <1 indicate that emissions were calculated to be less than 0.5 pound per day.

Table 5.7-7 – Summary of Project GHG Emissions (metric tons per year) Source MT CO2 MT CH4 MT N2O MT CO2E
Mobile – Passenger Cars 1,204
1,465 <1 0 1,204
1,466
Mobile – Trucks 4,316 <1 0 4,320
Energy Source 781 603 <1 <1 782 604
Area Sources <1 <1 0 <1
Water/Wastewater Sources 728 695 4 5 <1 846 842
Solid Waste Sources 86 115 5 7 1 0 214 285
Construction (Amortized over 30 years) 37 68 <1 0 38 68 Total 7,152
7,262 9 12 <1 7,405*
7,587*
SCAQMD Significance Threshold for Industrial Sources 10,000 MT CO2E = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MT CH4 = metric tons of methane
MT N2O = metric tons of nitrous oxide
*The GWPs included in CalEEMod are from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. For informational purposes, total emissions calculated by CalEEMod were adjusted to account for the updated IPCC Fifth Assessment Report GWPs.

Using the current GWPs, total annual project emissions would be 7,428 7,618 MT CO2, and would also be less than the screening threshold. Note that the IPCC updates the GWPs periodically, and the next anticipated update will occur in 2022.

Per DEIR Figure 3.0-9 – Site Plan (DEIR, p. 3.0-25), the dirt road that crosses Parcel A is identified as a “20’ wide temporary construction crossing on existing dirt road to be restored.” The existing dirt road is already utilized often by hikers, walkers, and mountain bikers, and the road would be scarified, replanted, and fenced off once its use as a temporary construction crossing is completed so that the area can no longer be used as a road through the restricted property. The recorded Declaration of Restrictive Covenants, dated June 11, 2009, recorded as Document No. 2009 - 0303932 Section 5(a) permits reasonable access through the Restricted Property to adjacent land over existing roads, and Section 5(d) provides that nothing in the Restrictive Covenant is intended

I I I I
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-93
to limit the Declarant from developing adjoining property for any purposes. Consistent with these prov
isions, the Amendment to the Restrictive Covenant, described above in Response 7.5 contains a provision to specifically allow the temporary use of the existing dirt road between the parcels by construction vehicles, and will provide for a restoration of this road upon completion of the project. It is also a part of the project description in the Riparian- Riverine DBESP report (contained in Appendix D of the DEIR) that was reviewed and approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of the Fish and Wildlife as part of the review for consistency with the Western Riverside County MSHCP, as indicated in the DEIR, Section 5.3 Biological Resources (DEIR, pp. 5.3- 26 – 5.3-27). Thus, use of the existing dirt road as a temporary construction crossing is not infeasible or inappropriate as the commenter states as the road is already utilized, use of the road is permitted in the existing restrictive covenant, and the road would be restored upon completion of excess material transport activities during construction.

The commenter additionally states that the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) expressed similar concerns in written comments responding to the Notice of Preparation (NOP) about construction of an access road under lands conserved under a restricted covenant . The commenter appears to have misconstrued/referenced this CDFW comm ent out of context in relation to his or her own comment regarding the existing dirt road which will be temporarily utilized to transport excess material between the parcels. Per pages 7 of 12 and 8 of 12 of DEIR Appendix A, the CDFW comment in question refers to the construction of the proposed access road to allow access to Building A from Alessandro Boulevard. In DEIR Appendix A, CDFW expresses that the DEIR should address how proposed mitigation would provide superior conservation values given that the conserved lands would be bisected by a road. As stated on DEIR pp. 3.0-19 through 3.0- 20, “As part of mitigation for the Project, 1.44 acres will be incorporated into Parcel A for a net gain of 0.63 acre of new Restricted Property… Parcels A and B will be managed in perpetuity by a professional conservation organization funded by the applicant as part of the mitigation for the Project.” DEIR p. 5.3 -35 further states, “The creation of riparian habitat in Area C on the southernmost portion of the Project site would provide biologically superior habitat.” Thus, CDFW’s concerns regarding the access road to Building A have been addressed by the DEIR and do not lend to the commenter’s statements regarding use of the existing dirt road, which, as previously mentioned, would be scarified, and replanted upon completion of temporary construction crossing activities.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.9: The commenter claims that because the Riverside Municipal Code (RMC) allows for construction to occur 7 AM – 7 pm, Monday – Friday and 8 AM – 5 PM on Saturday, that the EIR does not provide a “worst-case scenario” analysis of construction equipment emitting pollutants for the legal 12 hours per weekday plus 9 hours on Saturday.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-94
Just because the RMC would allow thes e hours of construction does not automatically mean that the construction contractor would conduct construction activities for 12 hours a day or on Saturdays. A standard 8-hour day, 5-days a week construction is anticipated for the duration of construction for this Project. Construction activities will be restricted to these hours with a Condition of Approval (COA). The estimates of equipment operation are based on surveys, performed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, of typical construction projects that provide a basis for scaling equipment needs and schedule with a project’s size.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.10: The commenter states the DEIR does not include analysis relevant to environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts, including cumulative impacts.

Environmental justice is not an environmental impact required to be evaluated or considered pursuant to CEQA, per CEQA Guideli nes Article 9. Contents of Environmental Impact Reports, Sections 15120 to 15132. Nonetheless, the air quality analysis contained in the DEIR demonstrates the Project would not result in environmental justice issues as further outlined below.

The ai
r quality analysis prepared for the Project provides an assessment of potential cumulative air quality impacts. The SCAQMD shares the responsibility with California Air Resources Board (CARB) for ensuring that all federal and state ambient air quality standards are achieved and maintained throughout the air basin. The SCAQMD has developed methodologies and thresholds of significance that are widely used throughout the air basin. SCAQMD staff has suggested in the cumulative significance methodologies contained in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook that the emissions-based thresholds be used to determine if a project’s contribution to regional cumulative emissions is cumulatively considerable. These thresholds were used in the Air Quality Analysis to assess the significance of the Project
-spec
ific and cumulative air quality impacts. Air quality
impacts are basin-wide, and air quality is affected by all pollutant sources in the basin. Therefore, the ambient air quality measurements provided in the Air Quality Analysis provide a summary of basin-wide cumulative air quality impacts. As the individual Project thresholds are designed to help achieve attainment with cumulative basin- wide standards, they are also appropriate for assessing the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. As shown in Tables 7 and 9 of the Air Quality Analysis (Appendix C to the DEIR), construction and operational emissions would be less than the applicable project-level thresholds. Additionally, the project would be consistent with the growth projections used to develop the AQMP and would therefore not conflict with implementation of the AQMP or applicable portions of the SIP. As such, air quality impacts would be less than significant.

On DE
IR pp. 5.2-31 to 5.2-32, in response to Threshold C, which questions whether the Project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, the DEIR describes the localized significance threshold (LST) analysis utilized in determining these potential impacts.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-95
DEIR pp. 5.2-3 1 to 5.2-32 state that, “LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities.” These pages of the DEIR further state that, “the Project was analyzed for its potential to result in significant health risk impacts resulting from short-term construction and long- term operational emissions” and that it was determined, “the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during construction and operational activities.” SCAQMD also recommends the preparation of a mobile source Health Risk Assessment (HRA) if a project is expected to generate or attract heavy-duty diesel trucks, which emit diesel particulate matter (DPM). T he Project’s Health Risk Assessment (HRA; DEIR Appendix C) discusses the Project’s potential impacts regarding DPM emissions, cancer risk, non- carcinogenic risk, residential exposure, worker exposure, and school children exposure. Because construction and operational activity would not result in an exceedance of the SCAQMD’s DPM cancer risk exposure threshold of 10 in one million, or non -cancer risk threshold of 1.0, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial DPM pollutant concentrations during Project construction or operation, and impacts would be less than significant with Mitigation Measure MM AIR-1. (DEIR, pp. 5.2-33 – 5.2-35.)
Thus, contrary to the commenter’s statements, the DEIR does include analysis relevant to environmental justice issues as the LSTs utilized in determining potential impacts to sensitive receptors were developed in response to environmental justice concerns and the Project HRA assesses potential Project-related health risks to residents, workers, and school children.

Further, as stated on DEIR p. 5.2 -37 under Cumulative Environmental Effects, “SCAQMD considers the thresholds for project-specific impacts and cumulative impacts to be the same.

Therefore, projects that exceed project-specific significance thresholds are considered by SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable.” DEIR p. 5.2-37 goes on to state, “in terms of localized air quality impacts, construction and operation of the Project would not have a cumulatively considerable impact due to criteria pollutant emission.” Therefore, as the Project was determined not to exceed any of the emissions significance thresholds, including localized significance thresholds, and would accordingly not result in cumulatively significant air quality impacts, the Project would not result in significant impacts regarding the environmental justice issues stated by the commenter.

Therefore, this comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.11:

The commenter correctly summarizes Exhibit 4- 1: Project (Passenger Car) Trip Distribution of Appendix L (Traffic and VMT Analysis), which identifies 20 percent of passenger cars exiting the Project site traveling westbound on Alessandro Boulevard. The commenter opines that the Health Risk Assessment (HRA) excluded westbound traffic from the HRA and only includes eastbound traffic on Alessandro Boulevard as illustrated on Exhibit 4-B of the HRA. First, it should be noted that the focus of the HRA is on truck traffic, which has the potential to generate diesel particulate RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-96
matter. The analysis in the HRA has been conducted i n acc ordance with the guidelines in the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis (HRA Guidance). (HRA, Appendix C, p. 20.) As set forth in SCAQMD’s guidance, “Emissions of diesel particulates can occur from the following activities associated with diesel trucks [emphasis added]:
• Truck traffic on local streets and arterials in transit to or from the facility (i.e., truck stop, warehouse/distribution center or transit center),
• Truck idling and movement on- site at the facility (i.e., truck stop, warehouse/distribution center or transit center), and
• Operation of Transportation Refrigeration Units (TRUs) at the facility (i.e., truck stop, warehouse/distribution center or transit center).” (HRA Guidance, pp. 3-4.)

The commenter fails to acknowledge that Exhibit 4-2 Project (Truck) Trip Distribution of Appendix L (Traffic and VMT Analysis) identifies that truck traffic is required to travel eastbound on Alessandro Boulevard and would not travel westbound on Alessandr o B oulevard. Also, as outlined in the DEIR, Section 5.12 Transportation, 5.12.5 Project Design Considerations (DEIR, p. 5.12-35) both of the driveways, Barton Street and Driveway 1 and Driveway 2/Vista Grande Drive and Alessandro Boulevard, will have full access driveway for passenger cars only and trucks will be restricted from heading westbound on Alessandro Boulevard. As such, the analysis in the DEIR and underlying technical studies is correct and no changes are needed.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.12:

The commenter states that the DEIR must be revised to include modeling scenarios for 9- , 30-, and 70-year cancer risk calculation to provide a useful representation of cancer risk in accordance with guidelines utilized for modeling. The commenter additionally states that the 16-70 age bin for sensitive receptors must be modeled as well.

The HRA modeled three different time periods of exposure, for three distinct land use types, as summarized in Appendix C of the DEIR. The HRA includes a 30- year exposure scenario for residential occupancies, a 25- year exposure scenario for worker occupancies, and a 9 -year exposure scenario for a school- child occupancy. Therefore, the DEIR and supporting Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (HRA) did evaluate modeling scenarios for 9- and 30-year cancer risk, as outlined in the HRA page 3, Table ES-1: Summary of Cancer and Non-Cancer Risks, and as shown below.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-97

The use of
the 30-year and 25-year exposure durations for residential and worker occupancies is based on recommendations published by SCAQMD in their Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, & 212 (2017).1 Page 7 of the SCAQMD guidance clearly i dentifies the Exposure Duration (ED) for a residential land use as 30-years and a worker location as 25-years.

The commenters request for evaluating a 70 -year exposure duration is not necessary or supported by substantial evidence.

Furthermore. t he HRA ut ilized relevant and appropriate procedures to quantify risk. Under available risk assessment guidance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)2, variable exposure adjustments can be utilized to quantify risk. The HRA uses acceptable levels of risk or thresholds, including the exposure duration.

In the HRA, exposure duration is discussed relative to residential occupancy. As noted, the HRA is based on USEPA guidance to develop viable, realistic, and accurate dose estimates based on reasonable maximum exposures, which are defined as the “highest exposure that is reasonably expected to occur.” USEPA’s long-standing guidance for the quantification of dose estimates is based on what is defined as “reasonable.” According to the USEPA:

Reasonableness refers to the findings of the risk assessment in the context of the state - of-the science, the default assumptions and the science policy choices made in the risk

1 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/permitting/rule-1401-risk-assessment/riskassessproc-v8-

1.pdf?sfvrsn=12
2 http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12464#Download TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CANCER AND NON-CANCER RISKS
Maximum Ufetime Significance Exceeds
l ocation Time Period' Cancer Risk Threshold Significance (Ri~k per Million) (Risk per Million ) Threshold
Maximum Exposed Sensitive Receptor 30 Year 0.49 10 Exposure No Maximum Exposed Work er Receptor 25 Year 0.08 10 No Exposure Maxi mum Exposed School Child Receptor 9 Year 0.003 10 No Exposur e Maximu m Hazard Significance Exceeds
l ocation Time Period Significance Index Threshold Threshold Maximum Exposed Sensitive Receptor Annual Average 0.0002 1.0 No Maximum Exposed Worke r Receptor Annual Average 0.00003 1.0 No Maxi mum Exposed School Child Receptor Annual Average 0.000006 1.0 No 1 Based on the Office of Environm ental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) recomm endations, cancer risk t o resid ential rece-ptors are based on a 30.yeair expos-ure duration, 25 years for worl:er recepto rs, and 9 years for children at school sites (2).

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-98
assessment. It demonstrates that the risk assessment process followed an acceptable, over
t logic path and retained common sense in applying relevant guidance. The assessment is based on sound judgment. Reasonableness is achieved when: a) the risk characterization is determined to be sound by the scientific community, EPA risk managers, and the lay public, because the components of the risk characterization are well integrated into an overall conclusion of risk which is complete, informative, well balanced, and useful for decision making b) the characterization is based on the best available scientific information c) the policy judgments required to carry out the risk analyses use common sense given the statutory requirements and Agency guidance d) the assessment uses generally accepted scientific knowledge e) appropriate plausible alternative estimates of risk under various candidate risk management alternatives are identified and explained.

The USEPA (Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund -Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual
3) introduced the concept of reasonable maximum exposures (RMEs). Thi s approach is intended to estimate a conservative exposure case (i.e., well above the average case) that is representative of the range of possible exposures. Activity patterns for population mobility are specifically addressed in the Exposure Factors Handbook (U.S. EPA, 1997 4), whereby lifetime
risk values for residents account for an exposure duration of 30 years (95th percentile).

Additionally, as identified by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)5, the Integrated Public Use Mi crodata Series (IPUMS- USA) census data 6 was reviewed to determine an appropriate assumption for length of residency to determine the exposure duration used in the analysis. The IPUMS -USA database consists of more than 50 samples of the American population drawn from 15 federal censuses and from the American Community Surveys (ACS). ACS is a nationwide survey that collects and produces population and housing information every year from 3 million selected housing unit addresses across every county in the nat ion.

IPUMS-USA samples, which draw on every surviving census from 1850 to 2000 and the 2000 to 2009 ACS samples, collectively constitute the quantitative information on long- term changes in the American population. Based on this review, the most recent IPUMS-USA ACS data (2006 to 2009) show that the percentage of California households with a residency period of 30 years or greater is less than 9 percent, meaning that over 91 percent of California residents had lived in their current location for less than 30 years. This data also showed that over 63 percent of Californians have lived at their current residence for 9 years or less. Therefore, a 70- year

3 http://www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/ragsa/pdf/rags_a.pdf 4 http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12464#Download 5 http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/SRP/Appendix%20L.pdf 6 Steven Ruggles, J. Trent Alexander, Katie Genadek, Ronald Goeken, Matthew B. Schroeder, and Matthew Sobek. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2010
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-99
exposure duration is very unlikely to occur given average residency times, specifically in Calif
ornia.

The 30-year lifetime exposure is a default assumption recommended by the OEHHA that takes into account early life (infant and children) exposures. The averaging time for exposure was correctly assumed to be 70 years, which is the lifetime exposure period OEHHA uses to develop cancer potency factors or dose. This approach is consistent with the identified averaging times recommended by SCAQMD in their Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, & 212 7 which also correctly utilize a 70-year exposure duration as part of the risk calculation for averaging time since that is the same averaging time used by OEHHA to develop the cancer potency factor, as SCAQMD notes, use of a 70-year averaging time is also a recommendation from OEHHA. As outlined in the SCAQMD’s Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, & 212 , Instructions for Calculating Cancer Burden (page 18) the cancer burden for 70 -year exposure duration only needs to be calculated if the resulting Maximum Individual Cancer Risk (MICR) from a 30-year exposure duration is greater than one in one million, as shown in the excerpt from this document below.

As outlined above, the HRA page 3, Table ES -1: Summary of Cancer and Non- Cancer Risks indicates the Project will not result in cancer risk from a 9- , 25-, or 30-year exposure of greater than one in one million. Therefore, the 70-year exposure calculation is warranted and not required consistent with SCAQMD and OEHHA recommended methodology. Also, a separate calculation for the 16-70 year age bin is not warranted or required either, as the 16-30 year group is included within the 30-year exposure calculations and the 31-70 year age bin, which would be included in the 70-year exposure calculation is not warranted or required as the 30-year exposure calculation does not reach or exceed the threshold of one in one million.

Therefore, this comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.13: The commenter states that the Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report within DEIR Appendix D does not indicate whether rain had occurred within five days of each burrowing

7 http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/permitting/rule-1401-risk-assessment/riskassessproc-v8-1.pdf?sfvrsn=12

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALIT Y MANAGEMENT DISTRI CT
RISK ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES FOR RULES 1401 .1401.1 & 212

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CALCULATING CANCER BURDEN
The cancer burd en is the estimated increase in the o ccmTence of cancer cases in a populati on as a result of exposures to TAC emissions from the e quipment over a 70-year exposure duration. The cancer burden for a population unit (city, census trac t, sub-area or grid) is the product of the number of persons in the population and the estimated individual risk from TACs . The cancer burden only needs to be calculated if the resultin g MICR from a 3 0-year exposure duration is greater than one in one million.

Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-100
owl survey. The commenter goes on to state that the DEIR mus t be revised to indicate whether rain was present within five days of each survey.

Review of dates within five days of each survey based on Records of Climatological Observations obtained from the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Climate Data Online Search indicate that no rain/precipitation was present within 5 days of the April 24, 2020 survey; within 5 days of the May 7 survey; within 5 day of the May 21 survey; or within 5 days of the June 5 survey. Therefore, each survey was conducted in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Area. In response to this comment, DEIR p. 5.3-8 of Section 5.3 Biological Resources has been revised as follows:

Burrowing Owl
Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia; BUOW) is protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code and is a CDFW SSC . BUOW focused surveys were conducted in 2018 with updated focused surveys conducted in 2020 on April 24, May 7, May 21, and June 5, 2020. No rain was present within five (5) days of each survey in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside MSHCP Area. Based on the results of the 2018 and 2020 BUOW focused surveys, BUOW are presumed absent on the Project site (ELMT p. 15). Although no individual BUOW or BUOW sign was observed during the surveys, potentially suitable BUOW burrows were recorded via CNDDB observations within a five (5) mile radius of the BSA as shown on Figure 5.3 -5 – CNDDB BUOW Observations.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.14:

The commenter states that the DEIR does not include maps or photographs of data including the locations of “suitable burrowing owl habitat, potential owl burrows, burrowing owl sign, and any owls observed” per The Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions. Per this comment, DEIR Appendix D – Burrowing Owl Focused Survey Report has been revised to include the revised Exhibit 4 “Survey Area and Suitable Habitat,” which depicts suitable burrowing owl habitat and suitable burrows within the Project site and survey area.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-101
Response 7.15:

The com
menter states that the State of California lists two approved compliance modeling software for non- residential buildings related to energy. The commenter is correct that the two approved compliance models referenced are the two approved compliance methods specifically for Title 24 compliance. However, these models require specific building material and equipment information as inputs to the model that are not yet available. Very specific information on ventilation rates, pipe installation, recirculation duct leakage, etc. are required input parameters for running these models and is simply not available at this time. The compliance modeling software that is referenced by the commenter would be used to confirm final building design and equipment, with the detailed information that is included in construction drawings and prepared approximately 12- 18 months after entitlement , to confirm the buildings would be Title 24 compliant. The construction drawings are not available at this time and are not typically prepared until after the Project is approved/entitled. The DEIR and underlying technical studies correctly utilize CalEEMod which estimates energy demand based on average intensity factors for similar land use types based on the site plans provided to the City for entitlement. Since the Project’s tenant is unknown at this time, and information about the future tenant’s energy use is not available at this time, it is appropriate to defer to the CalEEMod default assumptions which have been derived by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) based on survey data. There is no requirement of the DEIR to show specific compliance with 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards at this time as that will be a requirement prior to issuance of a building permit and verified by the City Building and Safety Department.

Therefore, this comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.16: The commenter claims that there are discrepancies within the CalEEMod output sheets regarding CO
2 emissions.

The comment incorrectly interprets the CalEEMod output. Summer and winter emissions are expressed in terms of pounds per day, while annual emissions are expressed in terms of metric tons per year. The daily summer/winter emissions (pounds) are calculated based on the worst - case daily construction activity per phase which includes amount of equipment operational in one day (see Table 5 of the Air Quality Analysis and Table 4 of the GHG Analysis), and the number of daily workers , vendor, and hauling trips. The annual emissions (metric tons) are calculated based on the same worst-case daily construction activity per phase and the standard assumption that construction would occur five days per week, which is what would occur for project construction. Construction activities will be restricted to 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, with a Condition of Approval (COA). Note that there are approximately 2,205 pounds per metric ton. The comment incorrectly states that a 75 percent reduction in emissions was applied. The correct GHG emissions in terms of metric tons per year are found in the CalEEMod annual output and are summarized in Table 7 of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis. As such, the analysis in the DEIR and underlying technical studies is correct and no changes are needed.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-102
This comment does not affect the analysis compl eted or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.17:

The commenter states the DEIR does not include the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) determination reports and, thus, the DEIR must be revised and recirculated for public review including the FAA determination reports.

While the FAA determination reports themselves had not been included as part of the DEIR, a summary of the reports’ findings and an analysis of Project compliance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 as it relates to building heights was included on DEIR p. 5.8-26. Building heights were also included in the Project description (DEIR, pp. 3.0-27 – 3.0-28.) The discussion provided on DEIR p. 5.8-26 references/summarizes the findings of the reports; thus, the inclusion of the reports would not have changed the analysis of Project compliance and, accordingly, recirculation of the DEIR is not required. Nonetheless, the FAA determination reports will be provided as an appendix to the Final EIR as Appendix M.

It should be noted that even with the addition of the FAA determination reports as Appendix M , no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.18:

The commenter states that the DEIR and DEIR Appendix B includes Riverside General Plan 2025 (GP 2025) Policies AQ-1.1 and AQ-1.2 related to environmental justice and that the DEIR must be revised to include analysis of environmental justice issues in reviewing potential impacts , including cumulative impacts.

Environmental justice is not an environmental impact required to be evaluated or considered pursuant to CEQA, per CEQA Guidelines Article 9. Contents of Environmental Impact Reports, Sections 15120 to 15132. Nonetheless, the air quality analysis contained in the DEIR demonstrates the Project would not result in environmental justice issues as further outlined below.

Please see Response 7.10, which discusses how the DEIR Section 5.2 Air Quality includes analysis related to environmental justice with the localized significance threshold (LST) analysis utilized in determining potential impacts to sensitive receptors. As discussed in Response 7.10, DEIR pp. 5.2-31 to 5.2-32 state that, “LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities” and that it was determined, “the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during construction and operational activities.” Response 7.10 further discusses that the Project’s Health Risk Assessment (HRA; DEIR Appendix C) discusses the Project’s potential impacts RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-103
regarding diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions, cancer r is k, non- carcinogenic risk, residential exposure, worker exposure, and school children exposure. Further, the Project was determined not to exceed any of the emissions significance thresholds, including localized significance thresholds, and would accordingly not result in cumulatively significant air quality impacts. Thus, the DEIR does include air quality analysis as it relates to environmental justice issues and the Project would be consistent with GP 2025 Policies AQ-1.1 and AQ-1.2. However, in response to this comment, the following has been added to DEIR p. 5.2 -17 in Section 5.2 Air Quality:

Policy AQ-1.1: Ensure that all land use decisions, including enforcement actions, are made in an equitable fashion to protect residents, regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location, from the health effects of air pollution.

Policy AQ -1.2: Consider potential environmental justice issues in reviewing impacts (including cumulative impacts for each project proposed).

The following has additionally been added to DEIR Appendix B, pp. 29-30:

Air Quality Element
Objective
AQ-1:

Adopt land use policies that site polluting facilities away from sensitive receptors and vice versa; improve job- housing balance; reduce vehicle miles traveled and length of work trips; and improve the flow of traffic.

Policy AQ -

1.1 Ensure that all land use decisions,
including enforcement actions, are
made in an equitable fashion to
protect residents, regardless of age,
culture, ethnicity, gender, race,
socioeconomic status, or geographic
location, from the health effects of air
pollution.

Section 5.2 as well as Project’s Air
Quality Analysis discuss the
localized significance threshold
(LST) analysis utilized in
determining poten tial air quality
impacts to sensitive receivers. The
LSTs “were developed in
response to environmental justice
and health concerns raised by the
public regarding exposure of
individuals to criteria pollutants in
local communities” (DEIR pp. 5.2-
31 to 5.2-3 2). It was determined
“the Project would not exceed the
SCAQMD LSTs during
construction and operational
activities.”
Consistent
Policy AQ -

1.2 Consider potential environmental
justice issues in reviewing impacts
(including cumulative impacts for
each project proposed
As stated under Policy AQ -1.1
above, Section 5.2 as well as
Project’s Air Quality Analysis
discuss the localized significance
threshold (LST) analysis utilized in
determining potential air quality
impacts to sensitive receivers. The
LSTs “ were developed in
Consistent
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-104
response to environmental justice
and health concerns raised by the
public regarding exposure of
individuals to criteria pollutants in
local communities” (DEIR pp. 5.2-
31 to 5.2- 32). The Project was
determined not to exceed any of
the emi ssions significance
thresholds, including localized
significance thresholds, and would
accordingly not result in
cumulatively significant air quality
impacts.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the signifi cance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.19:

The commenter claims that the DEIR must be revised to include analysis of the Project’s impact in relation to General Plan policies CCM-2.3 and CCM-2.4, which state:
“Policy CCM-2.3: Maintain LOS D or better on Arterial Streets wherever possible. At key locations, such as City Arterials that are used by regional freeway bypass traffic and at heavily traveled freeway interchanges, allow LOS E at peak hours as the acceptable standard on a case-by-case basis.

Policy CCM-2.4: Minimize the occurrence of streets operating at LOS F by building out the planned street network and by integrating land use and transportation in accordance with the General Plan principles.”
The DEIR states in Section 5.10.5, Pg. 5.10-22,
“Although the General Plan target LOS will be exceeded, the intersection is currently built out to its General Plan ultimate cross -section and until additional right -of-way beyond those designated in the General Plan is obtained, there are no anticipated feasible improvements.”
Additionally, per the Office of Planning and Research,
“Even if a General Plan contains a LOS standard and a project is found to exceed that standard, that conflict should not be analyzed under CEQA. CEQA is focused on planning conflicts that lead to environmental impacts. (The Highway 68 Coalition v. County of Monterey (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 883; see, e.g., Appendix G, IX(b) [asking whether the project will “Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-105
environmental effect?”].) Auto delay, on its own, is no longer an environmental impact under C
EQA.” (https://www.opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb -743/faq.html#general-plans- with- los)
The following has additionally been added to DEIR Appendix B, pp. 9-10 for clarity:

Circulation and Community Mobility Element
Objective
CCM-2:

Build and maintain a transportation system that combines a mix of transportation modes and transportation system management techniques, and that is designed to meet the needs of Riverside’s residents and businesses, while minimizing the transportation system’s impacts on air quality, the environment and adjacent development.

Policy CCM -

2.3 Maintain LOS D or better on Arterial
Streets wherever possible. At key
locations, such as City Arterials that
are used by regional freeway bypass
traffic and at heavily traveled freeway
interchanges, allow LOS E at peak
hours as the acceptable standard on
a case-by-case basis.

The DEIR was prepared while the
State and City were transitioning
from LOS to VMT as a CEQA
impact. While the DEIR includes
LOS and VMT analysis, the Office
of Planning and Research
confirms that auto delay, on its
own, is no longer an
environmental impact under
CEQA. While the Project would
not be consistent with this policy,
the Project would not have a
significant impact related to LOS
because LOS is not considered
an environmental impact.

Inconsistent
Policy CCM -

2.4 Minimize the occurrence of streets
operating at LOS F by building out
the planned street network and by
integrating land use and
transportation in accordance with the
General Plan principles.

Although the General Plan target
LOS will be exceeded at the
Sycamore Canyon Boulevard
and Alessandro Boulevard
intersection, the intersection is
currently built out to its General
Plan ultimate cross-section and
until additional right-of-way
beyond those designated in the
General Plan is obtained, there
are no anticipated feasible
improvements.

Additionally, the DEIR was
prepared while the State and City
were transitioning from LOS to
VMT a s a CEQA impact. While
the DEIR includes LOS and VMT
impacts, the Office of Planning
and Research confirms that auto
delay, on its own, is no longer an
environmental impact under
Inconsistent
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-106
CEQA. While Project would not be
consistent with this policy, the
Project wou ld not have a
significant impact related to LOS
because LOS is not considered
an environmental impact.

The DEIR states in Section 5.10.5, pg. 5.10-20,
“Although the LOS target in the General Plan Circulation Element cannot be achieved for the Sycamore Canyon Boulevard and Alessandro Boulevard intersection, the Project would not conflict with any other General Plan policies addressing the circulation system and potential impacts are less than significant.”
The DEIR was prepared while the State and City were transitioning from LOS to VMT as a CEQA impact. While the DEIR includes LOS and VMT impacts, the Office of Planning and Research confirms that auto delay, on its own, is no longer an environmental impact under CEQA. The Project would not have a significant impact related to LOS because LOS is not considered an environmental impact. By including a LOS analysis, the DEIR goes above and beyond CEQA requirements when analyzing transportation related deficiencies and its relation to land use and planning impacts. This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.20:

The commenter alleges a conflict exists between the quantity of warehousing allowed between the site’s General Plan designation of Business/Office Park (B/OP) and that of the quantity allowed by the Zoning and Specific Plan designation.

Refer to Response 7.3 above which addresses this comment.

Response 7.21:

The commenter claims the Project requires a Conditional Use Permit instead of a Minor Conditional Use Permit because the Project would have warehouse facilities that would exceed 100,000 square feet (SF). The commenter claims this would conflict with the City’s current Municipal Code Section 19.150.020.

Refer to Response 7.4 above which addresses this comment.

Response 7.22:

For response to the commenter’s incorrect claim of AQ and GHG modeling errors, such as the incorrect claim regarding haul truck trips, please see Response 7.8 above.

The commenter claims the DEIR did not provide any consistency analysis with the goals SCAG’s 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS. The commenter incorrectly states that the Project has significant potential for inconsistency with Goal 5, Goal 6, and Goal 7 of SCAG’s 2020 -2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS. The Project would be consistent wit h the goals listed by the RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-107
commenter, a s outlined below in Table 3 – Project Consistency with the 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS Goals . The Project would be consistent with Goal 5 related to AQ and GHG because the Project would not have significant AQ or GHG impacts, DEIR pp. 5.2-24 - 5.2-37 and

5.7-21 – 5.7-41. The DEIR does include analysis relevant to environmental justice issues as the LSTs utilized in determining potential impacts to sensitive receptors were developed in response to environmental justice concerns and the Project HRA assesses potential Project-related health risks to residents, workers, and school children. As the Project was determined not to exceed any of the emissions significance thresholds, including localized significance thresholds, the Project would not result in significant impacts regarding environmental justice.

The Project would support Goal 6 regarding heal thy and equitable communities by providing various benefits to the community such as employment opportunities as well as donation of land for a trailhead parking lot with improvements such as a shade structure with benches, bike rack, drinking fountain, and car and bicycle parking for accessing the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park. The Project would support Goal 7 regarding adapting to a changing climate in various aspects through Project design features such as installment of conduits for vehicle charging stations and bicycle parking at the Project site.

The following has additionally been added to DEIR Appendix B, p. 54 for clarity:

Table 3- Project Consistency with the 2020-2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Goal 4:

Increase person and goods
movement and travel choices within
the transportation system.

Consistent: The Project proposes a logistics center within the SCBPSP on a site that has been designated for industrial uses since 1984. The SCBPSP is strategically located near State Route 60 and Interstate 215, which provide good access to the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles.
2020-2045 RTP SCS Goal 5: Reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and
improve air quality.

Consistent: The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas analysis (DEIR Appendix C and H) conducted for the Project determined it would not result in emissions that would exceed thresholds or result in significant impacts. The Project will meet or exceed all applicable standards under California’s Green Building Code (CalGreen) and Title 24. The Project includes design
considerations to help reduce emissions both during
construction and operations including:

Energy Efficiency
• Design building shells and components, such as
windows, roof systems and electrical systems to
meet California Title 24 Standards for
nonresidential buildings.
• Use of Energy Star products such as appliances,
building products, heating and cooling equipment,
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-108
appliances, and other energy-efficient equipment.
• Install efficient lighting and lighting control
systems. Solar or light-emitting diodes (LEDs) will
be installed for outdoor lighting. Lighting will
incorporate motion sensors that turn them off
when not in use.
• Install skylights on the rooftops, 2.5% of roof area of the buildings and incorporate the use of natural light. • Achieve construction energy efficiencies and energy
conservation through bulk purchase, transport, and
use of construction materials. Use of materials in bulk reduces the preparation and transport of construction
materials as well as transport and disposal of
construction waste.
• Use trees and landscaping on west and south exterior
building walls to reduce energy use.

Renewable Energy
• Design buildings to have “solar ready” roofs that
will structurally accommodate later installation of
rooftop solar panels. Building operators providing
rooftop solar panels will submit plans for solar
panels prior to occupancy.

Water Conservation and Efficiency
• Create water-efficient landscapes in compliance with
the City’s Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation
Ordinance 19.570.
• Surface parking lots will be landscaped in accordance with City standards to reduce heat island effect.
• Install water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture-based irrigation controls and
sensors for landscaping according to the City’s Water
Efficient Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance 19.570,
which complies with the California Department of
Water Resources Model Efficient Landscape
Ordinance.
• Design buildings to be water efficient. Install water- efficient fixtures and appliances.
• Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non-vegetated surfaces) and control
runoff.
• Provide education about water conservation and
available programs and incentives to the building
operators to distribute to employees.

Solid Waste Measures
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-109
• Sort, recycle, and divert from landfills Project-related construction and demolition waste in accordance with
mandatory regulatory requirements.
• Provide interior and exterior storage areas for
recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling
containers located in public areas.
• The property operator will provide readily available
information provided by the City for employee
education about reducing waste and available recycling
services.

VMT, Transportation and Motor Vehicles
• Limit idling time for commercial vehicles to no more
than five minutes.
• Implement sidewalks to facilitate and encourage
pedestrian and access, which would reduce vehicle
miles traveled (VMT).
• Provide a total of 39 electric vehicle (EV) parking stalls to encourage the use of low or zero-emission vehicles. • Provide a total13 clean air/van pool parking stalls
to support and encourage ridesharing.
• Provide short-term and long-term bicycle parking per
the Cal Green Code Sections 5.710.6.2.1 and

5.710.6.2.2, respectively.
• The Building Operator will support and encourage
ridesharing and transit for the construction crew.

On-Site Equipment and Loading Docks
• The Project will require building operators (by contract specifications) to turn off equipment, including heavy- duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable
equipment, when not in use for more than 5 minutes.

Truck idling shall not exceed 5 minutes in time. All
facilities will post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for more than 5 minutes pursuant to Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 2485, which limits idle times to not more than five minutes.

Construction
• Require Construction Equipment to Turn Off When Not
in Use.
• Use “green” building materials where feasible, such as those materials that are resource efficient and recycled and manufactured in an environmentally conscious
way.
• During grading heavy-duty construction equipment
shall be CARB/ US EPA Tier 3 certified. All
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-110
construction equipment is subject to the CARB In-Use
Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation.
2020-2045 RTP/SCS Goal 6: Support
healthy and equitable communities.

Consistent: The Project includes design considerations to promote walking and the use of bicycles:
• Implement sidewalks to facilitate and encourage
pedestrian and access.
• Promote the use of bicycles as an alternative means of transportation by providing short-term and long-term
bicycle parking per the California Green Building
Standards Code Sections 5.710.6.2.1 and 5.710.6.2.2,
respectively.
• The Project also includes a trailhead parking area adjacent to the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park, which is a
popular location for mountain biking and hiking.
2020-2045 RTP SCS Goal 7: Adapt to
a changing climate and support an
integrated regional development
pattern and transportation network.

Consistent: The Project proposes a logistics center within the SCBPSP on a site that has been designated for industrial uses since 1984. The SCBPSP is strategically located near State Route 60 and Interstate 215, which provide good access to the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. The Project includes design considerations to promote the use of an integrated transportation network:
• Implement sidewalks to facilitate and encourage
pedestrian and access, which would reduce vehicle
miles traveled (VMT).
• Provide a total of 39 electric vehicle (EV) parking stalls to encourage the use of low or zero-emission vehicles. • Provide a total13 clean air/van pool parking stalls
to support and encourage ridesharing.

Provide short-term and long-term bicycle parking per
the Cal Green Code Sections 5.710.6.2.1 and

5.710.6.2.2, respectively.
2020-2045 RTP/SCS Goal 9:

Encourage development of diverse
housing types in areas that are
supported by multiple transportation
options.

Not Applicable: Encouraging development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options is beyond the scope of the proposed Project and the authority of the Project proponents. The Project site is within the SCBPSP and has been planned for industrial uses since 1984.

The SCBPSP is strategically located in proximity to State Route 60 and Interstate 215.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-111
2020-2045 RTP/SCS Goal 10:

Promote conservation of natural and
agricultural lands and restoration of
habitats.

Not Applicable. Promoting conservation of natural and
agricultural lands and restoration of habitats is beyond the scope of the proposed Project and the authority of the Project proponents. However, the Project does not include any
component that would impede the attainment of this goal.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.23:

The commenter asserts the DEIR Transportation analysis does not include all potentially significant impacts on the transportation facilities providing access to the site. The commenter incorrectly claims the DEIR must be revised and circulated to include analysis of additional intersections, freeway merge/diverge segments, and freeway on/off ramps.

The Traffic Operations Analysis (TA), contained in Appendix L of the DEIR, was prepared by a licensed engineer employed by Urban Crossroads and in accordance with the City of Riverside Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide (December 2017), the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002), and consultation with City of Riverside staff during the scoping process. Further, the TA was prepared using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology with study area intersections located within the City of Riverside, County of Riverside, March Joint Powers Authority, and City of Moreno Valley have been analyzed using the software package Synchro (Version 10). Synchro is a macroscopic traffic software program that is based on the signalized intersection capacity analysis as specified in the HCM. (TA, Section 2.2)
The commenter incorrectly claims the DEIR must analyze additional facilities not included in the TA because of 20 percent of passenger car trips heading westbound on Alessandro Boulevard and 5 percent of passenger car trips heading southbound on Sycamore Canyon Boulevard/Meridian Parkway. The passenger car trip percentages were calculated based on the Project’s TA, which considers multiple factors in its analysis, such as existing and projected cumulative traffic counts. The Project’s passenger car trips were analyzed separately from the truck trips. The commenter fails to acknowledge that Exhibit 4-2 Project (Truck) Trip Distribution of Appendix L (Traffic and VMT Analysis) identifies that truck traffic is required to travel eastbound on Alessandro Boulevard and would not travel westbound on Alessandro Boulevard.

The DEIR states in Section 5.12.1, pg. 5.12-1:
“The intersections studied were those where the Project is anticipated to contribute 50 or more peak hour trips. If the Project was not anticipated to increase peak hour trips by 50 RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-112
or more at other nearby intersections, they were screened out and not evaluated further in t
he TA.”
The facilities mentioned by the commenter were screened out of the TA because the Project would not contribute enough peak hour trips to warrant analysis.

The DEIR was prepared while the State and City were transitioning from LOS to VMT as a CEQA impact. While the DEIR includes LOS and VMT impacts, the Office of Planning and Research confirms that auto delay, on its own, is no longer an environmental impact under CEQA. The Project would not have a significant impact related to LOS because LOS is not considered an environmental impact. By including a LOS analysis, the DEIR goes above and beyond CEQA requirements when analyzing transportation related deficiencies and its relation to land use and planning impacts. Additionally, per the Office of Planning and Research, “Even if a General Plan contains a LOS standard and a project is found to exceed that standard, that conflict should not be analyzed under CEQA. CEQA is focused on planning conflicts that lead to environmental impacts. (The Highway 68 Coalition v. County of Monterey (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 883; see, e.g., Appendix G, IX(b) [asking whether the project will “Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?”].) Auto delay, on its own, is no longer an environmental impact under CEQA.” (https://www.opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb -743/faq.html#general-plans- with- los)
This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.24:

The commenter incorrectly claims the Project should not be modeled as a high- cube transload short-term warehouse and should be modeled as a fulfillment center warehouse instead.

The DEIR describes the proposed warehouse buildings in Section 3.2, pg. 3.0-20:
“The proposed warehouse buildings are proposed for high cube transload short-term use, primarily for the short-term storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials), usually on pallet loads or larger handling products prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical high cube warehouse has a high level of on- site automation and logistics management. No refrigeration use is proposed in the warehouses (cold storage) or with the trucks (transport refrigeration units “TRUs”).”
The commenter references the SCAQMD High- Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis and provides a website link to this reference.

The referenced SCAQMD High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis states in the Executive Summary, pg. 1:

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-113
“Definition of High- Cube Warehouse – A high- cube warehouse is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on- site automation and logist ics management. The automation and logistics enable highly -efficient processing of goods through the HCW. For the purpose of this trip generation analysis, HCWs are grouped into five types: fulfillment center, parcel hub, cold storage facility, transload facility, and short- term storage facility.”
The commenter erroneously claims the Project is more of a fulfillment center warehouse than a high-cube transload short-term warehouse (HCW) due to high levels of on- site automation and logistics management and the handling of products prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. As shown in the SCAQMD High-Cube Warehouse Vehicle Trip Generation Analysis excerpt above, these are descriptions of typical HCWs regardless of the five types of HCWs.

As outlined in the DEIR, Section 3.0 Project Description, the proposed Project includes high-cube warehouse uses within the two buildings and was appropriately analyzed as such in the various technical studies (traffic, VMT, air quality, greenhouse gas) supporting the DEIR. However , to further ensure future use of the site is consistent with what was analyzed in the EIR, Mitigation Measure MM AIR-1 is revised accordingly to include a restrictive covenant on the property that restricts the use of a fulfillment center and use of TRUs as follows:

MM AIR-1: The project applicant is required to record a covenant on the property (Parcels 1 and 2) that prohibit manufacturing, fulfillment center, and use of Transportation Refrigeration Units (TRUs). Proof of the record of covenant shall be submitted to the City of Riverside Planning Department prior to issuance of Building Permits.

As summarized in the DEIR and underlying technical studies, the proposed Project that was analyzed (as defined in the Project Description of the DEIR) was High- Cube Transload Short - Term Warehouse, and not fulfillment center warehouse or refrigerated warehouse and correlating use of TRUs on trucks. Therefore, the EIR and supporting technical studies do not evaluate or cover other uses of the site, and if other uses are proposed or would be allowed on the site, that would require new air quality, greenhouse gas, and HRA modeling and analyses, as well as subsequent CEQA review and approval by the City.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR.

Response 7.25:

See Response 7.19 above.

Response 7.26:

See Response 7.3 above.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-114
Response 7.27:

See R
esponse 7.22 above and Appendix B Table 3 – Project Consistency with the 2020 -2045 Connect SoCal RTP/SCS.

Response 7.28: The commenter claims that the EIR’s calculation of 586 employees is actually

1.3% of the City’s employment growth from 2016 – 2045 and that a single project accounting for more than 1% of the projected employment growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth. The commenter additionally asserts that the EIR must also provide demographic and geographic information on the location of qualified workers to fill these positions in order to provide accurate environmental analysis. The commenter references a SCAG Employment Density study calculation of 1,046 employ ees to claim the project represents 2.4% of the City employment growth from 2016 – 2045 and that a single project accounting for more than 1% of the projected employment growth over 29 years represents a significant amount of growth.

The SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast data referenced by the commenter, Table 14 Jurisdiction-Level Growth Forecast, page 39 does indicate employment for the City of Riverside is forecast to grow from 145,400 in 2016 to 188,700 in 2045, for an increase of 43,300 jobs. The 586 employees or jobs created by the Project would constitute 1.3% of the forecast growth in Riverside from 2016 -2045. There was a typographical error in the DEIR and Initial Study (Initial Study, DEIR Appendix A p. 43.) and is revised as follows:

Section 6.4.1 Population Growth, p. 6.0-6 changes as follows:

However, the anticipated number of employees for both buildings was calculated using the County of Riverside generation rate
8 to be approximately 586. This number represents approximately 0.3

1.3 percent of the expected opportunities within the City by 2045. Thus, the Project will not induce substantial population growth and impacts would be less than significant.

Section 6.4.2 Economic Growth, p. 6.0-6 changes as follows:

Additionally, as described above in Section 6.4.1, the 586 employment opportunities represent approximately 0.3 1.3 percent of the expected opportunities within the City by 2045.

However, the SCAG Employment Density Study referenc ed by the commen ter with 1,046 employees, is taken out of context and is not appropriate for the City of Riverside or the Project area as it is a study by the Metropolitan Washington DC Council of Governments and from October 2001, thus it is outdated, and is not from an area on the west coast, let alone southern California, and is not appropriate or correct for employment rates for the Project area.

As the GP 2025 does not contain employment generation rates for different land use ty pes, use of the County of Riverside General Plan Square Feet/Employee Factor of 1,030 SF per employee for Light Industrial land use, was appropriate as the County of Riverside is an adjacent jurisdiction and has a land use designation for Light Industrial similar to the City of Riverside, and has existing warehouse developments of various sizes and uses, also consistent with the City of Riverside.

8 County of Riverside General Plan Square Feet/Employee Factor of 1,030 SF per employee for Light Industrial land use, Appendix E -2: Socioeconomic Build -Out Assumptions and Methodology, April 11, 2017, https://planning.rctlma.org/General-Plan-Zoning/General-Plan RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-115
The commenter does not provide any substantial evidence as to why the County of Riverside Gener
al Plan Square Feet/Employee Factor of 1,030 SF per employee for Light Industrial land use is not an appropriate generation rate, or why a threshold of 1% is an appropriate threshold for defining a significant amount of growth. Therefore, the commenter’s claim that the Project, with an estimated 586 employees, would constitute a significant amount of growth is arbitrary and not based on evidence.

As the Project is consistent with the existing land use plan designations (GP 2025 and SCBPSP), SCAG’s growth Projections for the City incorporate the type of growth that would result from the Project. Per the SCAG Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast, Table 14 Jurisdiction-Level Growth Forecast, page 39, employment for the City of Riverside is forecast to grow from 145,400 in 2016 to 188,700 in 2045, for an increase of 43,300 jobs. This employment forecast exceeds the employment generated by the Project and the other 27 planned or pending projects identified in the cumulative project list of the DEIR (Section 4.0, pages 4.0-2 to 4.0-5, and Figure 4.0 -1), a s the SCAG region analyzed encompasses a much larger geographic area including all of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties.

The 586 employees or jobs created by the Project would constitute 1.3% of the forecast growth in Riverside from 2016- 2045. Per SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report
9, data for the City of Riverside for 2016 the jobs to housing ratio is 1.54, increasing to 1.64 for 2045 and is considered housing rich. Also, as outlined in this report page 4, “While j ob growth and unemployment drops have characterized the recovery from the Great Recession, slower population growth is anticipated not just in the SCAG region but across California and nationwide. ” Therefore, it can reasonably be assumed that there are enough residents to fill jobs generated by the Project and the Project will not induce substantial population growth.

It should be noted that even with this revision to the DEIR, no change to the significance conclusions presented in the DEIR will result. Accordingly, this comment and the subsequent DEIR revisions do not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, do not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and do not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record, and revisions to the DEIR have been made as noted above.

Response 7.29: The commenter claims the California Important Farmland Finder identifies the site as Farmland of Local Importance and that the EIR excludes this information.

The DEIR does, in fact, identify that the Project site contains mapped Farmland of Local Importance, as show in Figure 4 – Farmland Mapping, of the Initial Study, contained in Appendix A to the DEIR. A discussion of impacts to Farmland of Local Importance is included in the DEIR in Section 7.1.1.1 (DEIR, p. 7.0-1) as well as in greater detail in the Initial S tudy on page 26, as outlined below, and concludes the potential impacts to be less than significant:

9 https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan-adopted-final-plan
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-116

This
comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.30:

The commenter claims the DEIR does not provide meaningful analysis of the Project’s construction employment generation. The DEIR already notes that temporary employment opportunities generated during construction of the Project are expected to come from the existing regional workforce. Additionally, the Initial Study, Section 14, Threshold a., pg. 43, states, “Construction is anticipated to last approximately 15 months. Construction of the Project would generate the demand for temporary construction jobs. However, given the availability of labor in the Riverside County and San Bernardino County region, and the southern California region as a whole, it is reasonable to assume that the construction of the Project will be completed by existing companies already doing business in the area with employees already residing in the area. Thus, construction-related growth inducement would not result from implementation of the Project.” Based on default construction worker assumptions from CalEEMod, the Project is expected to require the following number of construction workers : 9 for site prep, 10 for grading, 319 for building construction, 8 for paving, and 64 for architectural coatings, for a combined total of 410.

The CalEEMod default assumptions have been derived by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) based on survey data.

As outlined in Response 7.28 above, the Project is consistent with the existing land use plan designations (GP 2025 and SCBPSP), SCAG’s growth Projections for the City incorporate the type of growth that would result from the Project. Per SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report, data for the City of Riverside for 2016 the jobs to housing ratio is 1.54 increasing to 1.64 for 2045 and is considered housing rich. Therefore, it can reasonably be assumed that there are enough residents to fill jobs generated by the Project and the Project will not induce substantial population growth.

The Project sire includes approxi mately 33.67 acres of designated Fannland of Local lmponance and approximatel y 14.18 a<:res of Other Land (see Figure 5. Fannland Mapping ). TI1ere is no designated Prime Fann land. Unique Fannland. or Fannland of Statewide lmponance within the Project site, or in the immediately surround ing area. It is importall! 10 note that CEQA·s. definition of-'agr icuhural land" onlv includes Prime Fannland . Farm land of Statewide Importance, and Unique Fannland , and does not include Fannland of Local Imponance or Grazing Land , Under CEQA. impact s to designated Farmland of Local importance are not consider ed significalll and do not require mitigation.

The Project sire is located within the B?v[P-SP - Business and Manufacm ring Park and SCBPSP Overlay Zone s with a lancl 1Lse designated for Industrial Land Use. The propo sed u se for the Project site is industrial. which is consistent with the­ designated Overlay Zones. Also. other than the Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park. the Project site and the surrounding area is primaril y developed with industrial and commercial uses. The Project would not impact any existing fam1land and n<> surrounding land. is designaied for agricultural or fanning use.

Although implementation of the Projec t will result in the conversion of approxim;itely 33.67 acres of Fannlland of Local Importance to a 11011-agriculmrnl use. the proposed Project will 11ot convert Prime Fannl and. U11ique Fannland. or Fam1land of Statewide hn])Ortance (Fannlm1d), and therefore. the Project will have a less than signifi cant impact, direcrly, or cumuhtivel y, and further analysis in an EIR is nol warranted.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-117
Further, as desc ribed in the DEIR Air Quality Section 5.2, and as shown in Tables 7 and 9 of the Air Quality Analysis (Appendix C to the DEIR), construction and operational emissions would be less than the applicable project -level thresholds. T he Project would not result in significant impacts related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions; therefore, there is no obligation under CEQA to further reduce potential impacts via a local hiring requirement or otherwise.

Regardless, construction activity is typically short -term (1-2 years or less), as is anticipated for the proposed Sycamore Hills Distribution Center project, and does not constitute long- term construction needs which would trigger a large number of construction workers to move to Riverside permanently.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.31: The commenter incorrectly claims that the EIR excludes the proposed office areas from the employment calculation.

As the GP 2025 does not contain employment generation rates for different land use types, use of the County of Riverside General Plan Square Feet/Employee Factor of 1,030 SF per employee for Light Industrial land use, was appropriate as the County of Riverside is an adjacent jurisdiction and has a land use designation for Light Industrial similar to the City of Riverside, and has existing warehouse developments of various sizes and uses, also consistent with the City of Riverside.

As outlined in the County of Riverside’s General Plan Appendix E -2: Socioeconomic Build Out Assumptions, page 3:

Using this Square Feet (SF)/Employee factor to determine employment, the appropriate methodology is to divide the total number of building square feet for Li ght Industrial building by the SF/Employee factor of 1,030. Therefore, the total Light Industrial building square footage for the Project is 603,100 SF divided by 1,030, which is 585.5, which is rounded to the nearest whole number of 586. To use this method of determining employment it is not correct to use the square Square Pee t (SF)/Emp loyee Fac tor: This factor indicates the numb ei: of employees n•p;calh- assoc;ated wid1 11 gi,·en :imount of square feet of building space per employee. lt is used to estimate the uumb er of jobs resulting for a given laud use designacion. These factors for rhe commercial land use designation s are listed i..n T able E -5 below.
a e -T bl E 5 C . IE om merc 1a mp ovme n t F t ac ors
Land Use Desi,anation SF/Emolovee
Commercial Retail (CR)' 500
Commercial Tourist (CT) 500
Commercial Office (CO) 300
Light Industrial (LI) 1,030
Heavy Industrial (HI) 1,500
Business Park (BP) 600
•It ,s assumed that CR designated lands w,11 build out al 40% CR and 60% MDR.

E mployme nt: E mploym e11t for commercial, indu strial, and business pRrk land uses is Cllkular ed b,· dividing the totlll number of lmildi.ng squllre feet by the SF / Employee factor. For example, 300,000 squl\re (eet of conm1ercial office building space ,vottld yield 1,000 employe es.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-118
footage of office space within the larger warehouse building and then separately calculate the non
-office designated areas within the warehouse as Light Industrial. This is in essence double counting and combining two different land use designation types within the same building.

Therefore, it is inappropriate and inaccurate to use the SF/Employee factor for within the office portion of the warehouse when the methodology identified above indicates to use the total number of building square feet for the specified Land Use Designation, which for the warehouse buildings is Light Industrial.

As outlined in Response 7.28 above, the SCAG Employment Density Study referenced by the commenter with 1,046 employees, is taken out of context and is not appropriate for the City of Riverside or the Project area as it is a study by the Metropolitan Washington DC Council of Governments and from October 2001, thus it is outdated, is not from an area on the west coast, let alone southern California, and is not appropriate or correct for employment rates for the Project area.

Also as outlined in Response 7.28 above, the commen ter does not provide any substantial evidence as to why the County of Riverside General Plan Square Feet/Employee Factor of 1,030 SF per employee for Light Industrial land use is not an appropriate generation rate, or why a threshold of 1% is an appropriate threshold for defining a significant amount of growth. Therefore, the commenters claim that the Project, with an estimated 586 employees, would constitute substantial growth is arbitrary and not based on evidence.

As outlined in the DEIR, Section 4.3 Developments Considered in Cumulative Impact Analysis (DEIR, pp. 4.0-2 – 4.0-3), “The cumulative impact analysis utilized in this EIR considers a list of planned and pending projects. Currently planned and pending projects in Riverside and surrounding areas, including in the City of Moreno Valley and County of Riverside, are include in Table 4.0- 1 and shown on Figure 4.0 -1.” The DEIR contains a cumulative impact analysis consistent with the requirements of CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130). The intent of the cumulative impact analysis is to evaluate the Project’s potential impacts on the environment considered together with impacts to the environment from other planned and pending projects.

The cumulative analysis is not intended or required to determine if the project will exceed the SCAG employment growth forecast for the City.

As outlined in Response 7.28 above, the Project is consistent with the existing land use plan designations (GP 2025 and SCBPSP), SCAG’s growth Projections for the City incorporate the type of growth that would result from the Project. Per SCAG’s Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report, data for the City of Riverside for 2016 the jobs to housing ratio is 1.54 increasing to 1.64 for 2045 and is considered housing rich. Also, as outlined in this report page 4, “While job growth and unemployment drops have characterized the recovery from the Great Recession, slower population growth is anticipated not just in the SCAG region but across California and nationwide.” Therefore, it can reasonably be assumed that there are enough residents to fill the estimated 586 warehousing and logistics industry jobs generated by the Project and the Project will not induce substantial population growth.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-119
not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes
to the DEIR are required.

Response 7.32: The commenter claims the EIR is flawed and a revised EIR must be prepared and circulated for public review. The commenter also requests that Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance be added to the City’s public interest list for any subsequent environmental notices, public notices, public hearings, and notices of determination.

For all the reasons set forth above in Responses to Comments 7.1 through 7.31, no new information of substantial importance has been added to the EIR, and no new significant environmental impacts or substantial increases in existing significance impacts exist. Accordingly, recirculation of the DEIR is not required. (State CEQA Guidelines 15088.5) The City has added Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance with the mailing address provided to the City’s CEQA notification list.

Therefore, this comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-120
Comment Letter 8 – Ad am Salcido
Comment letter 8 commences on the next page.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-121

From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:
~~ <asalcido.07@gma il.com >
Monday, July 19, 2021 l :25 PM
Hernandez , Veronica
Unlrnown;j bourgeois 029@gm ail.com; Terrance Lucio; PATRICK HANINGER [External] Sycamore Hills Distribution Center
Good Afternoon Ms_ Hernandez,
Please provi de any updates to the above mention ed project.

I am requ esting under Public Resource Code Section 21092 _2 to add the email addresses and mailing address below to t he n otificatio n list, regarding any subsequent environmental docume nts, public notices, publ ic hearings , and notic es of determ ination for thi5 project .
t ludo57@gmai l.com
pha ninger1@gmai Lcom
8-1 .,ae.,s,,,a,.,lceeid,,,,osc.,,,0'-'-7=...,_,_,,,a,.it,.,,c,,o'-'-'m Mail ing Addr ess:

P.O. Box 79222
Corona, CA 92877
Please confirm rec eipt of this email.

Thank You,
Adam Salcido
RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-122
Letter 8 – Adam Salcido
Commenter: Adam Salcido
Date: July 19, 2021
Response 8.1: The commenter requests that the City add the provided email and mailing address to the City’s notification list. The City has added these emails and the mailing address to the City’s CEQA notification list.

This comment does not affect the analysis completed or conclusions provided in the DEIR, does not provide new information or evidence related to the analysis completed in the DEIR, and does not reflect on the adequacy or content of the DEIR. This comment is noted for the record and no changes to the DEIR are required.

RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-123
Comment Letter 9 – SW APE on behalf of Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance Comment letter 9 commences on the next page.

RVA
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-124

From:

Sent
To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments :

Dear Ms. Hernand ez
Hannah Bentley <bentley@b lumcol lim,.com>
Wednes.day, July 21, 2021 11 :03 AM
Hernandez, Veronica
Joe Bourgeo is; t.lucio57@gm ail.com; Craig Collins
[External] Sycamore Hills Distribution Center EIR
2021.07.21 _SycamoreHills Cororoeots(1 J.pdf
Please see the add itional comments by SWAPE submitted on behalf of the Golden state Environme ntal Justice Alliance, attached. Please confirm receipt.

Thank you,
Hannah Bentley
Hannah Bentley APC
Of Counsel
BlumC.oll ins LLP
Bentley@b lumcollins.com
Phone (213) 572-0400 x106
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intend ed recipient or recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohib;ted. if you ore not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy oil copies of the original message .

J-JPUASf. CONSlll6R Tl£ ENl'IRONl,IEM BEFORE PIUNl1NG THS EIIAL RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-125

91 9.2
RVA

I SWAP EI
Tt,;,hni,;,al Con~i(Jll , t>~Analy$i$ ~
Lftlg;atlon Support for the Enl/lronmtnl ,.._ _____ _.

July 21, 2021
Gary Ho
Blum C.Ollins LLP
707 Wi lshire Blvd, Ste. 4880
Los Angeles, CA 90017
2656 29'" Street , Suite 201
Santa Monic a, CA 90405
Matt H.agemann , eJ:i , ~
{949 ) 887-9013
m hagemann@s wape.com
P.aul E. Rose nfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
prosenfeld@swape .com
Subject: Comments on the Sycamore Hills Distribution Center Project (SCH No. 2020079023) Dear Mr. Ho,
We have reviewed the May 2021 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center Project ("Project") located in t he oty of Riverside (uCity"). The Project proposes to constru ct two warehouse buildings tota ling 603,100-SF, with Building A consisting of 10,000-SF of office space, 390,000-SF of unrefrigerated warehouse space, 388 parking spaces and 110 tra iler stalls; and Building B consistin g of 10,000-SF of office space, 193,100-SF of unrefrig erated warehouse space, 235 parking spaces, and 45 trailer sta lls; as well as a 1.18-acre trailhead parking lot, on the 12.23-acre Project site.

Our review condudes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluat e the Project's air quality, health risk, and green house gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construct ion and operation of the proposed Project are underestima ted and inadequately addressed. An updated DEIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitig ate the potential air quality, healt h risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that t he proj ect may have on the surround ing environ ment.

Air Quality
Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The DEIR's air quality analysis relies on emissions calculated with calEEMod.2016.3.2 (Appendix C, p. 21).1 ~ prov ides recommend ed default values based on site-specific informa tion, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated w ith 1 CAPCOA (November 2017 ) ~ User' s Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default­ source/caleemod[Ol usE!'r-39-s-e;uide2016-3-2 15november2017 .pdf?sfv rsn=4.

Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-126

9.3 -

9.4 project type. If more specific project informat ion is known, the user can change the default values and input project-specific values, but the California Environmenta l Quality Act (UCEQK) requires that such changes be justifi ed by substantia l evidence. Once all of the values are inputt ed into the model, the Project's construction and operat ional emis.sions are calculated, and "outp ut files 0 are generated. These
output fi les disclose to the reader what parameters are utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values are changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.

When reviewing the Project's ~ output files, provided in the Air Quality Analysis, Health Risk Assessment, Construction Health Risk Assessment Memora ndum (llAQ & HRA Memo") as Append ix C to the DEIR, we found that several model inputs w ere not consistent w ith information disdo.sed in the DEIR. As a result, the Project's constmction and operationa l emis.sions may be underestimated . - Incorrect Land Use Type
According to the DEIR, the project proposes to construct two warehouses, each with 10,000-SF of office space (p. 3.0-21 - 3.0.22). As such, the model should have included 20,000°SF of "General Office Building" and 583,100-SF of •unrefrig erated Warehous~No Rail." However , review of the ~ output fi les demonstrate that the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Passenger Cars" and u9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution c.enter -Trucks" models include all 603,100-SF as 0 Unrefri gerated
Warehous e-No Rair (.see excerpt below) (Append ix C, pp. 46, 79,112,139,166 , 193}. ..... ._ I
- I
-
I
... _
I , .. __,.,... I
-_..,. .. ,..._ ........ ___ ........ : -··· : - : .. w : -·-- I u OifiMMp'!cllll!Utlt .. . ""' : - : ,~,,, : ...... ,,, l 0 ••- •u••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••u•u•••••••••••••••••••••• • ............ : 00 :
-
: ~eo : :u...ooco :
.••••• 0 •••••••
As you can see in the excerpt above, the models fail to distinguish betw een the unrefrigerated warehouse and office land u.se.s. This inconsistency presents an issue, as ~ includes 63 different land use types that are each assigned a distinctive set of energy usage emission factors .1 Furthermore , each land use type includes a specific trip rate that ~ uses to calculate mobil~source emissions.' Thus, by failing to include the proposed office space, the models may underestimate the Project's construction and operationa l emissions and should not be relied upon to determ ine Project significance . ..__
Unsubstantiated Reductions to CH41 COz, and NzO Intensity Factors Review of the ~ output files demonstrates that the "9309 Sycamore Hill.s Distr ibution Center - Passenger Ca rs" and H9309 Sycamore Hills Di.stribut ion Center - Trucks" models i ndude manual reductio ns to the default CH4, CO2, and N2O intensity factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 48-49, 81-82, 114-115, 141-142, 168-169, 195-196).
l «~ u ser's Guide, Appendix D.* CAPCOA, September 201&, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/defau l't-source/ca leemod/upgrades/2016.3/05 appendix-d201&-3-1.pdf?sf\lrsr, =2. 1 ~ User's Guide, availabl e at: http ://www.agmd. gov/docs/default ­ source/caleemod/upgrades/2016.3/01 user-39-s-guide2016 -3-1.pdf?sfvrsn:2 . P. 14 . 2 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-127

9.4 -
&OOJ'.:Q,
RVA
00:Z,
I
G>IPr<l,l<fCl\ara<- : ~- : •mH 1~16'
::::::~ :::::r:::::: ~-:::::::r •••••••••• oCOI • ••• • ••••••• • ••••••• •••ooos ••••••••••• As you can see in the excerpt above, the c~. co.i, and N2O intensity factor s were reduced by approximat ely 21%, 21%, and 17%, respectively. As previously mentioned, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to model defau lts be justified.4 According to the " User Entered Comments & Non­ Default Datau table, the justification provided for these changes is: "Rf>S- 33% goal by 2020, 18.4% accounted for in ~ {Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). Furthermore, regarding the Renewable Portfol io Standard rRPS"), the DEIR stat es:
"The Project would be served by Riverside Public Utilities, which has achieved 36 percent renewables as of 2017. The Project's energy related GHG emissions would decrease as Riverslde Public Utilities increases its renewables procurement beyond 2020 towards the 2030goal of 50 percent" (p. S.5-25, Table 5.5-15).

However, these just ifications fail to substantiate the models' changes for four reasons.

First, the DEIR and AQ & HRA Memo fail to provide a source for the claim that the utility prov ider "has achieved 36 percent renewables as of 201r (p. S.S-25, Table 5.5-lS) . Without a source to corroborate this claim, we are unable to substantiate the revised CH., C01, and N,O intensity factors.

Second, the justif ication provided in the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table states that the model inclu des an 18.4% reduction ; however, review of the modeling demonstrates that the CH., C01, and N2O intensity factors were reduced by approximately 21%, 21%, and 17%, respectively.

Third, even if the utility provid er did achieve 36% renewable energy, this does not inherentl y result in a 36% reduction from t he 2016 ~ default values. Witho ut a justif ication explaining how a power mix including 36% renewa ble energy correlates in 21%, 21%, and 17% reductions from 2016 values, we are unable t o verify the changes.

Finally, simply stating that the Project's "emissions would decrease» as the utility provider "incr eases its renewables procureme nt beyond 2020 towards the 2030 goal of SO percent" does not offe r substantial evidence to justify the reductio ns included in the models.

These unsubstantiated reductions present an issue, as ~ uses the a--t., CO2, and N2O intensity factor s to calculate the Project's GHG emissions associated w ith electr icity use. 5 Thus, by including unsubstantiated reductio ns to the default CH4, CD.i, and N2O intensity factors, the models may underestimate the Project's GHG emissions and should not be relied upon to determ ine Project significa nee.
• ~ Us.er Gu ide, ovoiloble or: http://www.c aleemod.com/ . p. 2, 9 5 •~ u ser' s Guide .• CAPCOA, Novem ber 2017, o voiloble ar: http:/fwww.cale emad.com l D. 17. - 3
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-128

9.5 9.6 -
- Underestimated Parking Land Use Size
According to the DEIR, the propos.ed Project includes 388 parking spaces and 110 trailer stalls for Building A, 235 parking spaces and 45 trailer stalls for Building B, and a 1.18-acre trailhead parking lot (p.

3.0-19, Table3.0 "2; p. 3.0-22, Table 3.0-3; p. 3.0-23, Table 3.0-4). However, review of the ~ output fi les demonstrates that the H9309 Sycamore Hills Di.strib ut ion Center - Passenger CarsH and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center- Trucks" models include only a 5-acre parking lot (see excerpt below) {Appendix C, pp. 46, 79, 112, 139, 166, 193}.
.... ,,_ I ... I . ... -. ..... --. -
-
As you can see in the excerpt above, t he mode l includes only 5·acres of parking lot space. However, when inputting 778 parkingspaces0 into ~ plus the additi on of the 1.18-acretra ilhead parking lot, the model should include 8.18-acres of parking lot space. Thus, the parking lot land use size is underestimated by 3.18-acres in the model.

This underestimation ~ an issue, as the land use size feature is used throughout ~ to determ ine default variable and emission factors that go into, the model's calculations. The square footage of a parking lot land us.e space is used for ,certain calculations such as determin ing the ground space to be painted and amount of degreas.er to be used (i.e., voe emi55ions. from architectu ral coatings and consumer products) and area that is. light ed (i.e., energy impacts).7 Thus, by underest imating the proposed parking lot land us.e size, the models underestimate the Project's construct ion-related and operational emissions and should not be rel ied upon to determin e Project significance. - unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural Coating Emission Factors Review of the ~ output files demonstrates that the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribut ion Center - Passenger Carsn and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center -Trucks " models include several reduct ions to, the default architectural coating emission factors (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194)
TallloN'""" I I
• EF_~_E.xtenor : 10000
······-······· ··-··· ···· ··· ·· ♦ ····· ··· ·····- ····· · ···· · ····+----~,..,.,.----·························· ~ ; EF____ ; 11XlOD SOOD .......... ............ .......... ......... ~ ............ ............................... ................ _ .. _____ ,.._. _____ ·-------·------------- As you can see in the excerpt above, t he nonresidential exterior and interior architectura l coating emission factors. were each reduced from t he default value of 100- to SQ-grams per liter {g/L). As _yrevious ly mentioned, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to mode l defaults be justi fied.* 6 388 parking spaces for llu ilding A+ 110 tra iler stalls for Building A+ 235 parking spaces for Building B + 4S trailer stal ls for Building 11 = 778 tota l pa rking spaces .
7 •~ user 's Guide.» CAPCOA, November 2017, ovoifob/e at: http :ljwww.agmd .gov/docs/clefault ­ sou rce/caleemocl/Ol use r•39-s-gyicle2016-3 · 2 15november2017 .pctt?sfvrsn =4, p. 28. • ~ Us,er Guide , ovoi!ob/e or: http :ljwww .caleemod .com/, p. 2, 9 4 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-129

9.6 ~

9.7 RVA
According to the "Us.er Entered Comments & NorrDefau lt Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "SCAQMD Rule 1113 - Building Envelope and Non-Flat Coating limlt = SO g/L" (Appendi x C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). However, these changes remain unsupported for two reasons.

First, the DEIR fails to mentio n SCAQMD Rule 1113, or specify the reactive organic gas/volati le organic compound ("ROG" f:"VOC') conte nt limits that would be required. As a result, we cannot verify the revised architectura l coating emission factors.

Second, we cannot verify the accuracy of the revised architectura l coating emission factors based on SCAQMD Rule 1113 alone. The SCAQMD Rule 1113 Table of standards provides t he required voe limits (grams of voe per liter of coating) for 57 diffe r ent coating categories (e.g., Floor coat ings, Faux Finishing Coatings, Fire-Proofing Coatings, Cement Coatings, Multi-Co lor Coatings, Primers, Sealers, Recycled Coatings, Shellac, Stains, Traffic Coatings, Waterproofi ng Sealers, Wood Coatings, etc.).• The voe limits for each coating varies from a minimum vafue of 50 g/L to a maximum value of 730 g/L. As such, we cannot verify that SCAQMD Rule 1113 substant iates a reduction to the default coating values without more informatio n regarding w hat category of coating w ill be used. Absent addit ional informat ion regarding which categor ies of coating would be used for Project construct ion, we cannot compare the revised emission factors with the SCAQMD Rule 1113 requirements for t hose categories. The DEIR and associated documents fail to mention w hat type of coating will be used, and as such, we are unable to verify the revised emission facto rs assumed in the model.

These unsubstan tiated reduct ions present an issue, as ~ uses the architectural coating emission factors to calculate the Project's ROG/VOC emissions il550d ated with applicatio n rates and coating content. :oThus, by indud ing unsubstantiated reductions to t he default architectura l coat ing emission factors, the models may underestimate the Project's ROG/VOC emissions and should not be relied upon to deter mine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Changes w Individual Construction Phase Lengths Review of the ~ output files demonstrates that the u9309 Sycamore Hills Distributio n Center - Pass.enger Cars" and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center - Trucks» models indude changes to the defau lt individual constr uction phase lengths (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 47-48, 80-81, 113- 114, 140-141 , 167-168194-195 ).
• SCAQMD Rule 1113 Advisory Notice .• SCAQMD, Februa ry 2016 , ovoiloble at:
http:ljwww .agmd.go v/docs/default-so urce/rule -boolc/r eg-x:i/r11B.pdf?sfvrsn=24 , p.11 13-14, Table of St:andards

1. 1• ~ User Guide , available ar: http:[/www.agmcl .gov/docs/default•s.ource/ca leemod/01 user•39•s­ guide2016 · 3-2 15november2017 .pdPsfvrs .n=4, !l. 35, ,W_ 5 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-130

9.7 -
~
-- - .....00,,. !&00 11100 • ·••·•· ~~· · •··••: ••• •• •••• ··~···· ••••••• ,.: _____ 7,..-~-00----➔ ·••··•••·. 2-llOO • · •••·•••• ~ : NumO>i" : 1~GO •700
- - - - - --- -- - --- - - -- - - - • -- - - -- . ♦ -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- - --- - - - - - - -•----- --- --- -- --- --- - ----- - --- - ; N...0"!" 56.GO 11.00
·······~ ·······:···········N;.;,o.;.;··········· '.l&.GO ••••••••••• 1•00····· ······ ·······~ ····· ··: · · ······· ~········· 111271702• ········· ~ ··· ······ -------- -------- - - - - - -- ----- - ♦ - - --- - -- - - - - - - - - -- ----- -- - ---+------------ -- -- - --- ------ - ----- - --- -- - ""-El'dOMo 6126Q01• w,on
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• + ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ----------➔ •••••••••••••••••••••••••• -- : ~- et.lYml fillOQWI
·······~ ·······t ········~·········: !1<11'202• ••••••••• li/»'2022 ••••••••• ·······~·······t ········ ~ ········· ! S,12r.'!121 ••••••••• ~· ••••••••• · ···· · ··········· ·· · · ········ ---· · · ··· ·· ·· ·· · ·· ·· · ······ · · ···-+----------➔ •• •• ••• • • •••• • •• •••• • •• ••• - • ~ "'121m• "11/'lf1ll ····· · · ~ · ·····•+••· ······ ~ ··· · ···· ·-----8/2tilm1----- - . . . . ·111121m •••••• ••·••••i,ic.;;~ •·•·•••f••· ••••••~•••••••••-----,-Sl,-.,l:li202:-=:-l----1•••••··•·iii,iifiij ••••.•••• ····· ~~····· .i .. .. ···~··· . · - --- -,.S12"'1"'12m~,--- - ······· ··i,inim. ········· ·----------------------------..&.·-·······-···-··-···-········~--------- ---------- As a result of these chang es, th e model includes a construction schedule as follows (see excerpt below) (AppendixC, p-p. 53, 86,118 ,145, 172,199).

I !S...~.alm :8.tt.,,....IIIO& :&rlfi02I ••,aarcu1 !,: 11:
l ~~ ~ 1•!21/ZOI.I i~• •• '1 ' ••••••••••••••••.••••••• ,i······~~·~· ········~~- ···· !111121121 l6N211ll ~! 20! . ,........... • ........ . ~ •~p_,. ~ fwl201J !OQIY&ll ~! 1,!··"'··----------· ..... .. ,1······~-c... ········~eo... ;1.127121122 =~ 5; 111:························· As you can see in the excei-pts above, the site preparation phase length was reduced by roughly 67%, from the defau lt value of 55 to 18 days; the grading phase length was reduced by roughly 37%, from the default value of 75 to 47 days; the building constructio n l)hase lengt h was reduced by roughly 67%, from the default value of 740 to 243 days; the paving phase length was reduced by roughly 40%, from t he defau lt value of 30 to 18 days; and the architectural coating phase length was increased by roughly 102%, from the def a ult va I ue of 55 to 111 days. As previously mentioned , the ~ User's Gui de requires any changes to model defaults be justified.11 According to the NUser Entered Comments & Non· Default DataN tab le, the justification provided for this change is: "Grading/~ Road Construct ion · 3 mont hs Building Permit/B uilding Construction· 12 monthsN (Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). Furthermore, regarding the anticipated constructio n schedule , the DEIR states :
"Overall constr uctio n is a nticipated to last approximately 15 months. Grading and preliminary ro,ad const ruction is the first phase and is expecte d to last apprmcimately 3 months. After grading, building construction will last approximately 12 months and includes slab and wall framing, concr ete pouring, roof installation building interiors" (p. 1.0·3-1.0-4) . ._11 ~ User Guide, available at: hnp :ljwww .caleemod .com/, p. 2, 9 6 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-131

9.7 ~

9.8 RVA
However, these justifications are insufficient, as the DEIR fails to justify or explain why the individua l constricti on phase lengths were dfsoroportionatefv altered. While the grading and site preparatio n pha.ses correctly last for three months, and the building construction, paving, and architectu ral coati ng correctly last for one year, the model should have proport ionally altered the m based on the ~ default values.

These unsubstantiated changes present an issue, as they improp erly spread out construction emissions over a longer period of time for some phases, but not others. According t•o the ~ User's Guide, each construction phase is associated w ith different emissions activities (see excerpt below). 11 Qcmolltioa ln11olves remolllng bullthngs or structufes.

Sitt! PlltPo/i!bM 111volves clearln9 vegetaU0n (grubbing and lree/slump removal) and removmg stooes a.nd OlhOf u.nwanlcd mat!Wlal or debris prior to grading. ~volves the cut arid ftll of land to enstM"e that lhe propttr base and slope Is created for the foundallon.

BuJ/dinq ConstnJetJon m~ves lhe construclloo or lhe foundatioo, structutes and buJldlngs.

A@tl«fllrat CQ4/lng 1nv0111es In& appucauon of ooatlngs to bOth lhe interior al')tj e.)(lerlOr of bUJldln,gs or slfUctures. the palnting of parking IOt or parking garage SIJlplng, !1$soclated slgnage 011d curbs, and the pa nwig of lhe walls or olher oomponerits such as. stair ra~lrigs Inside parting stn.1c1uru.

Paving .,volves the laying of concseie or asphalt Stich a:S ~rl parking lots, road-s, driveways, or $idMYall<S.

As such, by disproportionatefy altering individual construction pha.se lengths w ithout proper j ustificatio n, the model's calculations are altered and may under estimate emissions. Thus, by including unsubstantiated changes to the default individual construction phase lengths, the model may under estimate the Project's const ruction-re lated emissions and should not be relied upon to determin e Proj ect sign ifica nee.

Unsubstantiated Reductions to Vendor and Worker Trip Numbers Review of t he ~ output files demonstrates that the M9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Passenger cars'' and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center - Trucks" models indude several: changes to the default vendor and worker trip numbers (see excerpt below) (Append ix C, pp. 49, 82, 115, 142, 169, 196).
l:::::::::::::~-::::::::f :::::::·:::::=::::::: .. 1 -----,:_,,.·,,..,:,.,.....---➔1 ······-· ::---······-I .............................................................................................. _______________________ _ As you can see in the excerpt above, the default vendor trip and worker t rip numbers were reduced by approximately 60%, from the default value of 249 to 99 trips, and from the default value of 638 to 25-3 t rips, respectively. As previously mention ed, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to model 11 •~ user's Guide.N CAPCOA, Novem~r 2017, available at: nttp ://www . .agmd.gov/doc:s/default­ source/ca leemod/01 user-39-s-gu ide201&-3 -2 1Snovember2017 .pdf?sfvrsn - 4, p . 31. 7 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-132

9.8 ~

9.9 defau lts be justif ied_ i 3 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" table, the justification provided for these changes is: "~ applies same worker/vendo r trip rates to parking/asphalt surfaces as it does to office/industria l building construction, result ing in overestimate of actual trips. Default trip-s adjusted to reflect ~ construction of buildings on ly" (Append ix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). However, these changes rema in unsubstant iated. According to the ~ User's Guide:
"~ was also designed to allow the user to change the defaults to reflect site- or project-specific information , when available. provided that the informotion is supported by substantial evidence as required bv CEQA." 14
Here, as the DEIR and AQ & HRA Memo fail to provide substantia l evidence to support these reduced vendor and worker trip number5, we cannot verify the changes. Furthermore, while the DEIR mentions worker and vendor trips, these changes are not substantiated whatsoeve, , and a greater number of vendor trips is indicat ed than is included in the model (p. 5.5-18; 5.5-19; p. 5.5-20, Table 5.5-4; p. 5.5-20, Table 5.5-5).

These unsubsta ntiated changes present an issue, as ~ uses the vendor and worke r trip numbers to estimate the construction-relat ed emissions associated with on-road vehides.05 Thus, by induding unsubstant iated changes to the default vendor and worker trip numbers, the models may underest imate the Project's mobile-source construction-related emissions and should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Operational Vehicle Fleet Mix Percentages Review of t he ~ output files demonstrates that the u9309 Sycamore Hills Distri butio n Center - Passenger Cars" and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center - Trucks:" models include several changes to the default operat ional vehicle fleet mix percentages (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 48, 81, 114, 141, 168, 195).
u ~ User Guide, available at: http:ljwww .caleemod.com/ . D. 2, 9 1' ~ User GuKle, available at: http:ljwww .caleemod.com/ , D. 12. 1s ~ User Guide, available at,· http://www. caleemod .com/ p. 34. 8 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-133

9.9 -­
~
RVA
•9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center- Passenger Cars~ IDiflHll.la : ..-, 0 03 000
............................. ~ ............................. +----------- -1· ........................ . lalf-h • LOA D~ 100
• ••••••• ••• ai,j:~ ·•••••••••• t•••·••• ...... LOTi •••••••••••. .._ ____ O_IM ____ --11• ..•...... 000 ••••••••••• ······ ···· ·~ ······ ·····!·· ···· ·······t.0i:i···· ······ ·· 020 ······ ··· ·· ooo···· ····· ·· .. ········· ~ ··········· t ·········· ·--LHDi" ·••··· •••·· 002 ••••••••••• OIIO ••••••••••• ................................................................................. ---------- ---................................. .

IIMF!od-la u-t02 S.&I'- 0 00
•• - ■ --•····M~- -- -· - ..... t---........ ......... .,_e,,,-············: "~ ■ ......... ... ODO--··· ............ . . ··•·-------------------------•-----------------------------+-·---- - -----1 - MDII 012 OIIO
•• •••••••••i,is::,;;;.,_••••••••••• f •••••••••••••i.i,j••••••••••••• a-.<XM • •• ••••• ••• 000 ••••••••••• ···········~ ··········· t ············ .. i<o·············. 0.1112 ••••••••••• o.oo ••••••••••• . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . . .. -...... ......................... .......... ·-·--------- -1• ............. ....... ...... . ~ : QelJ$ : 11100f-QJ.J ~00
.. ·········~··········· t············imut···--······· I locc.oG4 ••••••••••• 000 ••••••••••• . . . . .. . ................... ~-............................ - --------- -1• .................. ...... . -- : U8US 1 7.-.coJ 000
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• £ ••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••• ~ --------- ---------- - v9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - TrucksH
•••••••• - ········· - · · ••• • ••• HHO ••••• •• ••• 003 o» ·········· ~••··· · ·•···: ········ ·· ···w;.··· ··· ···· •··+.-----O-hS------11 ..••....• 000 ••..•••••• • • • -- .. . ........ ■ ••• • • • ■ • • ■ • • - • .&, •• ■• ■ •• - ••••••••••••• • - - •••• ■-· --------- -1-----.. ■• -· ... .... ... .... . . ~_. : WH OtM 000
........... ~ ........... : ............. iliii ""··-- .. ·--· : 020 ........... ooo····· .. ·--· ............... ........... -.. ~-.............. ........ ...... ..... · ------,,-,,.---- --1----·. .. .... . . .... .. .. . -· IJl01 : 002 011 ............. ....... ...... ... •· .................... ........ ---------- -1• ........... ............. . - ! I.Ht)] : 5~70t-w) 011 ...... ......... .. - ...... ... . . .. .... ,a. ... ... ...... .... ... - ...... .... ..... ...... ·---~,-,-,..,,.--- --- ........ . ... .. - .... ... ....... .. -( : '-'CY • ln.."'Ot-ooJ 0 00
••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••• • · •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ♦------------1'• .......... .............. . - • WIV • 0 12 000
---- ------ ---- ------ -_______ _ .. __ __ ---- ---- --- ---- ·- --- ----·+ •• _________ _ ______ -----· ···-- ·- ------ - - : 1,1~ : u- 000
• • • • ,.., • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • ••••• ,I. •., • ••••• •••• ••••••••••• •• •••• ♦-• ----,------ -1,I• •• •• • • • • .,., • • • ••• • • • • • .,,.,. • ~j" : ~ : Otr.: Q25i ···· ······ ·~ ···········t············ oous···· ········"":----2-,----l----1 · · ooo •• •• ....... ··~;-· ... ··t-········ ···w ········· .. ; 7 IOOOo-GIM . ... · ··· ooo ... ····· • .... ... . . . .......... . ..... ... ~- . .. ........ ... . ... .......... ,&.----~----- -1,· . . ... ........ ...... . .... . -. • U11US • 17-.ool 000 ................... ..... .. ............ .i. ..... ........... ............... ··-·· ··· ..... • _________ __, _ _______ _ As previously ment ioned, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justifi ed. ' 6 However, according to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data" tables. in the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distributio n Center - Passenger Car~t and "9309 Sycamore Hills Distributio n Center ­ Trucks" mod ef.s., the justifications provided for these changes are: -pa~nger cars only" and "Trucks only, mix per TIA," respectivel y (Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194}. Furthermore , the Traffic Impact Analysis., Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) AnalY5is ('TIA"), provided as Append ix L to the DEIR, provide the following fleet mix percentages. (see excerpt below) (pp. 64, Table 4• l):
--:- ~ user Guide, available at: httr,:/Jwww.caleemod.comJ , p. 2, 9 9 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-134

-9.9
~

9.10 -- P"'J•rt Trip G-r•tlon ltatu
rTHU AMPul~our PMP•"1<"'-
~u ... ' Cod• ur.1111 In (lu\ Toi.I Totol
DliJy
'"
o~,
Ht-,,<u~ Tron~d Yloll·Tetm War~
154 n r 0.062 O.o!8 o.oso 0,1)18 0072 0 100 L400 Witfl!O\lt Cott 5,to,a~J,•.:J - .. .,..,c,u,( 6'1.2" /IM, 78.)!IPM, 67.A O.lt;J 0.00 0.0 13 O.OS6 0.02 2 0.(156 0.078 0 .9A9 ---

2...w., Tludt• (s.u • IIM, l .61!1 PM, S381l Oafrl 0.® OAlOI 0.(1()4 0.(l() J 0.003 0.004 0.01!. 1-Aldo Trudu,(6,38! U M. 4.49'1 PM, 6.661' 0 .... 1 0.004 0,001 000~ 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.093 4 llolrt TN<h [lt,284'11M, l l.S9t1PM.,o .1ca.o. 1r1 0,01' 0.(1(13 o.oa 0-004 0.010 0.014 o .. m _,.._.Gr.tin~lO'I~ 11111 ...... d rt....-~~ t•tlJ. it»W!"!:::'.Cfm'4t:4 Jfll'O~lllU1) 1-Y-. tho,.,i.ar;d~ fffll
•v.-.-• ....,.. ,.,.. . .,, .n-r...- -.(ITTJ.!'1>.f--crj;,;-~ Tlnrov,.,11-P-t,,..10111 • \~ It Mh-'°"1f'Ct ~ oC ••.r~•l->-M &,......Plt~ «M<•«•Yt• rtr:nrYrtU l'o>Or!t!AsJtvwnl11'01.~ 20>11 , 11\flii~'l 1,o,Jfrf' ~~i6! f!S!.C~[!l.l.i t111Si!.&tr:OJllll!llllial1d!.l1:K1,!014) ~lz-dtj. Yll~ll<f-'4~l'lfffl
lo ,..H\Olr ,,..M. !O,,_ J-.,,,.1 ,0< - ,.......,J<tw,
'T01 .. 1"Sj"'1 ... v.l ...... •-ffCn•lt\•jt .• .......,,Nllll Howellt!r, tnis is insufficient for two reasons. First, the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Passenger Car~ mode l includes 100% light-duty auto ("LDA") vehicles; howeve r, passenger cars r.eiers. to all light-duty and med ium-duty vehicles. Second, the DEIR and a.ss.ociated documents fail to mention or justify how the truck fleet mix provided by the TIA corre lates to the revised operational vehicle fleet mix perce ntages included in the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Cente r - Trucks" model. As such, we cannot verify the revised values..

These unsubstant iated changes pre.sent an issue, as opera tional vehicle fleet mix percentages are used by ~ to calculate the Project' s operatio nal emissions associated wit h on-road vetiicles.17Thus, by including uns.ubstantiated changes to the defau lt operat ional vehicle fleet mix, the mode ls may underest imate the Project's mobile-source operatio nal emissions and should not be re lied upo n to ._ determine Project significance.

Unsubstantiated Reduction to Indoor Water Use Rate
Review of the ~ output files demonstrates that tne u9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center­ Passenger Ca rs" and Ng 309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Trucks" mode ls include a manua I reduct ion to the defau lt indoor water use rate (see excerpt below) {Appendix C, pp. 49, 82, 115, 142, 169, 196).
139.464.tlS 00 111.snf,(l).00
As previously mentio ned, the ~ User's Guide requ ires any changes to model defaults be justified.18 According to the "User Entered Comments & Non-Default DataN table, the justificat ion provided for these changes is: "~ requires 20% reduc tion in indoor wate r use (111,573,500 gallonsr (Append ix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). Furthermor e, the DEIR states:
17 ~ User Guide , available at: http ://www .caleemod .com/ p. 2, 9 ~Use.-Guide , ovof/ob/e ot: http:lJ.www.caleemoo.com/, p. 2, 9 i
RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-135

9.10 ~

9.11 RVA
"[T]h e project would be required to reduce indoor water consumption by 20 percent in accordance with ~ » (p. 5 . 7-40, Table 5.7-8).

However, t hese justificat ions are insuffici ent. Simply because ~ expects a 20% reduction in indoo r water use does not guarantee that this reduction would be implemented locally on the Project site. Absent addit ional informa t ion demons tratin g that these redu ctions would be achiev ed through the implementation, monitoring, and enforc ement of water-re lated mitigation measu res, we are unable to verify the revised indoo r water use rate inputted into the model.

This unsubstanti at ed red uction presents an issue, as ~ uses in door water use rates to estima te the amount of wastewater, which has direct emissions of GHGs. l!J By includi ng an unsubstantiated reductio n to the default indoor w ater use rate, the models may underestimate the Project's water­ related operation al emissions and should not be relied upon to determ ine Project significance . lncorrectApplication of Construction-Related Mitigation Measure Review of the ~ outp ut fil es demonstra tes that the "9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Passenger cars" and H9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center - Trucks" models include t he following construction-re lated mitigation measure (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 55, 88, 120, 147, 174, 201):

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
As a result, the model includes 61% PM 1a and PMu reductions (see excerpt below) (Append ix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194):

As previously mentioned, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be justified. 10 Accord ing to the "User Entered Comments and Non-Default Data" table, the justifica tion provided for t he inclusion of this measures is: M61% fugitive dust reduct ion associated with watering" {Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). Furthermore, the DEIR incorporates Mitigation Meas ure "MM" B10-3, which states:
"Water any expo-sed soil areas a min imum of twice per day, or as allowed under any imposed drought restrictions" {p. L0-17, Table L0-1) .
1 • ™ User Guide, available at: lmp:ljwww.c .aleemod.com/ . p. 44, 45. ~ ~ Use r's Guid e, availabl e ot: http:ljwww. agmd.gov/do cs/defau lt-sou rce/ca leemod /Ol use r-39 -!>­ guide 2016 -3-2 1Snov emb,er2017 .pdf?s-fvrSll=4, p. 2, 9. 11 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-136
{
However, while this measure is included in the DEIR, there is no mention of a 61% reductio n in PMIOand PMu emissions whatsoever . As such, we are unable to verify t his percent emissions reduc tion inclu ded

9.11 ·n the mode ls. By incorrect ly including an emissions reductio n associated with the above-me ntioned ~ construction-re lated mitigat ion measure, t he models may underestimat e the Project 's construct ion­ related emissions and should not be relied upon to determ ine Project significa nce.

9.12 Incorrect Application of Waste-Related Operational Mitigation Measure Review of the ~ ,output files demo nstrates tha t t he " 9309 Sycamore Hills Distr ibution Center - Passenger Cars-" and N9309 Sycamore Hills Distrib ution Center- Trucks" mode ls include the follo wing waste-re lated operational mitiga t ion measu re (see excerpt below) (Appendix C, pp. 75, 108, 138, 165, 192,2 19):

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Howeve r, t he inclusion of this wast e-related operat ional mitigation measure is unsupported. As previ ously mentio ned, the ~ User's Guide requires any changes to model defaults be ju:st ified_2:

However, t he "User Entered Comme nts and Non-Default Datau table fails to provide a j ustification for the inclusion of these measures (Appendix C, pp. 47, 80, 113, 140, 167, 194). Furthermore, the DEIR's Project Design Considerations state:
" Provide interior and exter ior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequ ate recycling conta iners located in public areas" (p. 5.5-15).

However, this design feature is not forma lly included as a mitigatio n measure. This is incorrect, as accordi ng to the Association of Environ menta l Professionals r ~EP") CEQA Portal Topic Poper on mitigation measures:
"While not "mitigatio n•, a good practice is to ind ude those proiect design featurelsl that address environmental impacts in the mitigation monito ring and report ing program (MMRP}. Often tfle MMRP is all t hat accompanies building and construct ion plans through the permi t process. If tlie design featu res are not listed as importa nt to address ing an environmenta l impact , it is easy for someone not involved in the original environmental process to appro ve a change to the proiect that could eliminate one or more of the design features without understandi ng the result ing environmenta l impacf' {emphas is added). z2
As you can see in the excerpt above; d esign featu res that are not formal ly includ ed as mitigation measures may be eliminated from the Pr oiect's design altogether. Thus, as the above-mentioned waste- 21 ~ User Gu ide, ovoilobte at: http: //www. agmd.gov/d<>cs/default -sourc e /caleem od/01 U>er-3 9-s­ guide2016-3-2 15nov ember2 017.pdf?sfv rs;n- 4 , I). 2, 9. 21 #CEQA Porta l Topic Paper Mitigatiori Meas ures.» AEP, Fe brua ry 2020, ovoilobl e at:
https:/lcegapo rtal.org/tp/CEQA9620 Mi'tigat ion%202020.pclf , D. 6. 12 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-137

{
elated operat ional mea5ure is not forma lly induded as a mitigat ion measure, we cannot guarantee that t wou ld be implemented , monitored, and enforc ed on the Project site. As a result, the inclusion of the

9.12 above-mentio ned operational mitigatio n measure in the mode l is incorrect. By including an operational ~ mitigat ion measure w ithout properly comm itting to its implementation, the models may underest imate the Project's operational emissions and should not be relied upo n to determ ine Project significance.

9.13 RVA
Updated Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Air Quality Impact In an effort to OJOr~i:l,M.itt!:lY. e~im.Glti: .th;; .P.CQi.,;~,:;. ,offitm~Pn -:fJ;I~ ATJd.Q~tiPJlij l mli~~i.Qo~. we prepared updated ~ mode ls, using the Project-specific information provid ed by the DEIR. In our updated model, w e included the correct land use types and sizes, omitte d the unsubstantiated changes to the defau lt CH.., COz, and N20 intens ity factors, architectural coating emission factors, vendor and worker t rip numbers, and indoor water use rate; proportionally altered the individual construction phase lengths as well as proportional ly adjusted to the operat ional vehicle fleet mix percentages to reflect ~ default values; and exdu ded the unsubstantiat ed construction-related percent PM,o and PM,s emissions reductio ns and waste-re lated operationa l miti gation measure.

Our updated analysis estimates that the Project' s constructio n-related ROG and operational NO~ emissions exceed the applicable SCAQMD threshold of 75-and 55· pounds per day (''~ day"), as reference d by the DEIR (p. 5.2-26, 5.2-31 ) (see table below).

Model voe
((Jwday)
DEIR Construction 32.00
SWAPE Construction 347
% Increase 984%
SCAQMD Regional Threshold (3lNday) 75
Threshold Exceeded ? Yes
Model NO.
l&vdavl
DEIR Operat ion 38
Area <1
Energy < 1
Passenger Car Mobile 2
Truck Mobil e 58
SWAPE Operation 60
%Increase 58%
SCA QMD Regional Threshold (3lNday) 55
Threshold Exceeded ? Yes
As you can see in the excer pt above, the Project's construct ion-re lated VOC and operational ND,c emissions, as estimated by SWAPE, increase by approximately 984% and 58%, respectively, and exceed 13 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-138
{
he applicable SCAQMD signific:ance thresho lds. Thus, our model demollSl:rates that the Project would esult in a potentially significant air quality impact that was not previously identified or addressed in the ~ DEIR. As a result, an update d EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potentia l air quality impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment.

9.14 9.15
Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The DEIR concludes diesel particulate matter («DPM") emissio ns associated with Project operation would pose a maximum incremental cancer r isk of 0.49 in one million to nearby, existing sensitfve receptors, which would not eKceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10 in one mill ion (p. 5.2-34-

5.2-35). Furth ermore, in regard to the Project's constructio n-related health risk impacts, the DEIR states:
0 Heavy-duty off-road construction equipment (graders, eKcavators, dozers, suapers , loaders, etc..) typically have diesel engines and emit DPM emissions. However, construction activity is typically short-term (1-2 years or less), as is anticip ated for the propos ed Sycamore Hills Distributio n Center pr,oject, and does not constitu te long-t erm exposure, typic ally used to generate risk estimates. As outlined above, construction emissions would not eKceed SCAQMD thresholds established to protect public health and air qualify. Therefore, the health risk associated w ith construction emissions woul d be less than significant for the surroundi ng sensitiv e uses and no mitigat ion is requiredN (p. 5.2-35).

As demonstrat ed above, the DEIR concludes that the Project would result in a less-than-significant construction-related health risk impact because const ruction activity would be short term and constru ction-r elated criteria air poll utant emissions w ould not exceed thresholds. Howeve r, the DEi R's evaluation of the Project' s potential health r isk impacts, as well as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.

First, the DEIR fails to quantita tively evaluate the Project's construct ion-related toxic air contamin ant (•TAC") emissio ns or make a reasonable effort to connect these emissions to poten tial health risk impacts posed to nearby existin g sensitive receptors. Despite the DEIR's qual itative claims, construct ion of the proposed Project w ill produce emissions of DPM through the exhaust stacks of constructi on equipment over a potential construct ion duration of one year and three mont hs (p. 1.0-3). However, the DEIR's vague di.scussion of potentia l DPM associat ed with Project construct ion fai ls to indicate the concentrations at which such pollutants would t rigger adverse health effects. Thus, w ithout making a r easonable effort to connect the Proj ect's construc tion-related TAC emissions to the potentia l health r isks posed to near by receptors, the DEIR is inconsistent with CEQA' s requir ement to corre late the incre.ase in emissions generated by the Project with the pote ntial adverse impacts on human health. {
Second, the State of California Departmen t of Justice recommends the preparation of a quantitative

9.16 HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment CUOEHHAN), the organization responsibl e for prov iding guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district 14 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-139

9.16 ~

9.17 9.18
RVA
guideli nes.23 OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Heafth Risk Assessments in February 2015.14 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. The OEHHA document recommends that all short ­ term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. As the Project's proposed construction duratio n vastly exceeds the 2-month requ irement set fort h by OEHHA, it is clear that the Project meets the thresho ld warranting a quanti fied construct ion-related HRA under OEHHA guidance. These recommenda ti ons refl ect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, we recommend that an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project-generated construction DPM emissions be includ ed in an updat ed EIR for the Project.

Third, while the DEIR includes an HRA evaluat ing the Project's mobile-source operationa l healt h risk impacts to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project-generated mobi le emissions, the HRA fai ls to evaluate the cumulative lifetime cancer risk to nearby, existing receptors as a result of Project construction and operotion together. According to OEHHA guidance, as refe renced by the AQ & HRA Memo, Nthe excess cancer risk is calculated separately for each age grouping and then summed to yield cancer risk at t he recepto r location" (Appendix C, p. 22}.25 However , the DEi R's HRA fails to sum each age bin to evaluate the total cancer risk over the course of the Project's total construction and operat ion. This is incorr ect and thus, an updated analysis should quant ify the entirety of the Project's construction and operotional health risks together and then sum the m to compare t o t he SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, as ref erenced by the AQ & HRA M emo (Appendix C, p. 22).

Screening-Level Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct .aur screening-l evel risk analysis we relied upon AERSCREEN, w hich is a screening level air quality dispersion model. 16 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is inclu ded in the OEHHA27 and the California Air Polluti on Control Officers Associated ("CAPCOA")2S guidance as the appropr iate air dispersion model for l evel 2 health risk screening analyses ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum rea5onable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which near by sensitive receptors may be e,cposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined model ing approach is required prior to approva l of the Project. 21 •warehous -e Projects: Best Pract ices ancl Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Enviro nmenta l Quality Act.# State of California Depart ment of Justic e, available at:
https:/foag.c .a.gov/shes/all/ffles/agweb/pdf-s/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf , p. 6. 2• "Risk Ass.essment Guiclelines ·Guidance Manua l for Prepa ration of Health Risk Assessm ents .• OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http:ljoehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots /hotspot s2015.html. 2' "Guidance Manu al fo r preparat ion of Health Risk Assessmen ts.• OEHHA, Februa ry 2015, available at:
https :ljoehha.ca .gov/media/down load.s/crn r/20 1Sguidancemanua l.pdf p. 8-4 26 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Scree ning Model, http: //www .epa.gov /ttn / scram/guidance / clarification / 2011041.l_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo .pdf 27 "Risk Assessment Guideli nes Guidance Manu a l for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. • OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http:ljoehha.ca .gov/ai r/hot spots/2O 15/201 5GuiclanceManual.pdf 28 CAPCOA (July 2009, Health Risk Assessme nts for Proposed Lancl Use Projects, http ://www.capcoa.org /wp­ content/ uploads/2012 /03/CAPCOA_ HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 15 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-140

9.18 ~
We prepared a prel iminary HRA of the Project's construction-re lated health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM:oe.xh-aust estimates from the DEIR's ~ output files.

Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed r esidential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. The DEIR' s ~ model indicates that construction activities will generate approx imately 253 pounds of DPM over the 455-day construc tion period . The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrat ions from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truc k trips over Project construction , w e calculated an average DPM emission rate by the follow i ng equat ion:
,mwm 2s3,21mrr 453.6
0'0 8F'"'i" rJ.i,'E.ii 9-::::-:-::-:• ----- rmmm ,mum,11 4 s ~ x ,,1.>,dfff IUIH
! nlW 1 h!ENJ;
X --- X ----- : (II\ 01~001~001 lf/11
24 h:!»;11 3,60 0
EEHP.um wu
Us.ing this equat ion, we estimated a construc tion emission rate of 0.00292 grams per second r g/ sN).

Construct ion activities were simulated as a 12.23-acre rectangu lar area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of 505 by 98 meters . A release height of three mete-rs was selected to repr esent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty venicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters wa.s used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.

An urban meteorological setting was selected w ith model-defau lt inputs for wind speed and direction distribution.

The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable est imates of single-hour DPM concentra tions from the Project site. I: PA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentr ation of an air pollutan t be estimated by multiplying the single-hou r concentration by 100/4.29 According to the DEIR, u[t)he sensitive receptors nearest to tfi e Project site include single and multi­ family residences to the south and southea.st of the Project site" (p. 5.2-10). Review of Google Earth demonstrates that these sensit ive receptors are located roughly 100 meters from the site. However, review of the AERSCREEN output fi les demonstrates that the maximally exposed receptor is located approximately 250 meters from the Project site. Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project constructio n is approximately 2.414 µg/m3 DPM at approx imately 250 meters dow nwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentratio n by 10%, we get an annualized average concentrat ion of 0.2414 µg/m 3 for Project construction at the M EIR.

We ,calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA. Consistent with the 455-day construct ion schedule included in the Project's ~ outp ut fil es, the annualized average concentratio n for Project construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and one year of the infantile sta,ge of life (0-2 years). ,. "Screening: Procedu res fo r Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revis.ed.w EPA, 1992, available or. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/sc:ram{guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pcff: see-also •Risk Ass.essment Guidelines ·Guidance Manua l for Preparation of Heahh Risk Assessments. • OEHHA, Februa ry 2015 , ovoi/ob/e at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/cmr/201!>guid.ancemanual.pdf p. 4-36. 16 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-141

9.18 ~
RVA
Consistent with the DEJR's operational HRA, we used Age Sensitivity Factors ("ASF") to account for th e heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution (Appendix B, p. 83). When applying ASFs, the ,quantified cancer risk should be multipl ied by a factor of ten duri ng the third trimes ter of pregnancy and during the first two years of life {infant) as w ell as multi plied by a factor of three during the ,child stage of life (2 - 16 years). Furthermore, in accordance with the guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95th percentile breathi ng rates for infa nts.3° Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fractio n of nme ~ Home rFAH") Value of 1 for the 3"' trimester and infant receptors.31 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg-day) 1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days.

The results of our calculations are shown below.

The Maximum Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor (MEIR) Duration Concentration Breathing Cancer
Activity Rate (L/kg- ASF Risk with
\Years, \Ug/llU J day} ASFs*
Construct ion 0.25 0.2414 361 10 3.3E-06
3rd Trimerter 3rd

0.25 Trimester 3.3E-06 Duration Exposure
Construct ion 1.00 0.2414 1090 10 4.0E-05
Infant Exposure 2.00 Infant 4.0E-05 Duration Exposure
Construction 6.00 * 572 3 *
Operation 6.00 * 572 3 *
Operation 14.00 261 1
Adult Exposure Adult
Duration Exposure
Lifetime l ifetime Exposure 30.00 Exposure 4.3E-05
Duration
* ep.rotionl>I """'"' rin calcubt •d ... p..-ali,fy i• lh• AQ, GMG, & I IRA Report.

As demonstrat ed in the table above, the excess cancer risks to infants and during t he 3td trimester of pregnancy at the MEIR located approximate ly 250 meters away, over the course of Project construction, are approxi mately 40 and 3.3 in one milli on, respectively. The excess cancer risk associat ed with the lO - suppl eme ntal Guidelines for Preparing Risk As.se-ssments for t he Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Inform ation a nd Assessment Act,» July 2018, avaitoble at: tlttp :/fwww .. agmd .e:ov/docs/default -source/plann ing/risk­ ass.e,ssment{ab2588supplementalguidelines.pdf . p. 16.
"Risk Assessm e nt Guide lines. Guidance- Manual for Prep a ration of Hea lth Risk Assessmen ts.# OEHHA. Fe bruary 2015, availaf1le at:· hnps://oetlha .ca.gov/media/downloads/cmr/2015 guidancemanua l.pdf l1 "Risk Asse ssme nt Proce du res for Rules 1401, 1401 .1, and 212.» SCAQMD, August 2017, avoi/obte or:
http: ljwww .ag m d .gov/docs/ defa u lt-source/ru le~book/P roposed - R u le.s/1401/ riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717 .pdf, p. 7. 17 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-142
9_18
~

9.19 Project constru ction alone over the course of a residential lifeti me is approximate ly 43 in one million.

When summing Project's construction-r elated cancer risk, as estimated by SWAPE, w ith the OEIR's excess operational cancer risk estimate of 0.49 in one million, we estimate an excess cancer risk of approximately 43.49 in one million over the course of a residential lifetime (Appendix C, pp. 502, Table ES-1).32 The infant and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulti ng in a potentially significant impact not previo usly addressed or identifi ed by the DEIR.

An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project's air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, w hich is known t o be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protectio n. n The purpose of the screening-level construction and operational HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link betwee n the proposed Project's emissions and the potentia l health risk.. Our screening-l'evel HRA demonstrates that construction and operati on of the Project coul d result in a potentia lly significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up-to-dat e, applicable guidan ce are used. Therefore , since our screening-level HRA indicates a potentially significant impact, the City should prepare a Project-specifi c EIR with an HRA which makes a reasonable effo rt to connect the Project' s air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors . Thus, the City should prep.are an updated, quantified air pollution mode l as well as an updated , quantified refined health risk analysis which adequate ly and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Jmpacts
The DEIR estimates that the Project would generat e net annual greenhouse gas (uGHG») emissions of 7,405 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year rMT C02e/year"), which would not exceed the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 10,000 MT C02e/year for industri al projects (see excerpt below) (p. 5_7-26, Table 5.7-7).
31 Calculated : 78 in one millio n+ 4.62 in one millio n=· 82 .62 in one million. n "Risk Assessment Gui deli nes Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. # OEHHA, Februa ry 2015, available or: hnps:l/oehha_ca_gov/med ia/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanuatpdf , p. 1-'S. 18 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-143

9.19 ~

9.20 RVA
Table 5.7-7 - Summary of Project GHG Emissions (metric tons per year) Source MT CO2 MT CH, MT N,O MT CO, E
Mobile-Pa er Cars 1.204
Mobile - Trucks
Erler Source
________ 4-'co,316
781
Alea Sources
WaterM'astewaler Sources
Solid Waste Sources
Con.struction Amortized over 30 ears
Total
MT CC>.iE = metric tons of caJbon dioxide @C!Ulvale:ot
MT CH.i : metric tx>M of methlll'le
MT N,O = m.ellic tons of niitrOU$ oxl~
<1
728
86 37
7 152
<1 0
<1 _-+-_ o
<1 <1
<1 0
4 <1
5 <1 0
9 <1
1,204
~320
782
<1
846
214
7 405"
10000
"The GWPs lneluded in CalEEMod are from the IPCC Fourth As$1:$S!Tienl Report. For Informational pull)Oses, tol.al emissions calculated by CalEEMocl were adjusted to account {o( the updated IPCC Fifth Msessmenl Report GWPs. Us!~ the current GWPs. total a,inual project en,jsslons would be 7.42.8 MT CO2. al'ld would il!so be leu than lhe ,creening threshold. Note that the IPCC updates the GWPs periodically , and lhe next anticipated update wlD OCQlr in 2022.

Furthermore , the DEIR relies upon the Project's consistency with the 2008 Good Neighbor Guide lines, CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan, and the Riverside Restorative ~ and O imate Action Plan (llRRG· CAP") in order to conclude thatthe Project would result in a less-than-significant GHG impact (p. 5.7-28 -

5. 7-40). However, the DEJR's GHG analysis, as w ell as the subsequent less-than-significant impact conclusion, is incorrect for three reasons.
(1) The DEl'R's GHG analysis relies upon an incorr ect and unsubstan tiated air model; (2) The DEIR incorrectly relies upon the Riverside Restorative ~ and Climate Action Plan; and
(3) The DEIR fails to consider the perfo rmance-based standards under CARB's Scoping Plan. 1 J Incorrect: and Unsubstantiated Quantitative Ana?Ysis of Emissions As previously stated, the DEJ R estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions -of 7,405 MT C02e/year (p. 5.7-26, Table 5.7-7). Howeve r, the DEIR's quantitative GHG analysis is unsubstantiated . As previously discussed, when we reviewed the Prefect's ~ output files, provided in the AQ& HRA Memo as AppendixCtothe DEIR, we found that several of the values inputted into the model are not consistent with information disclosed in the DEIR. As a result, the model under estimates the Project's emissions, and the DEIR's quantita tive GHG analysis should not be relied upon to determ ine Project significance . An updat ed EIR should be prepared that adequately assesses the potential GHG impacts that construction and operat ion of the propos ed Project may have on the surround ing environme nt.
2) Failure to Comply with the Riverside Restorative ~ and Climate Action Plan As previously discussed, the DEIR relies upon t he Project's consistency with the City of Riverside Restorative ~ and Climate Action Plan (RG-CAP). However , review of these guidel ines demonstrates that the DEIR's analysis is unsubstantiat ed, and the less-than-significant impact conclusion should not be rel ied upon. Specifically, according to the RG-CAP; 19 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-144
"The Subregional CAP suggests a goal for 2035 equiva lent to 49 percent below baseline emiss ions. This is derived from a straight -Ii ne interpo lation of the state -wide AB 32 goal and Executive Order (EO) S-3-05, which aims for 80% below 1990 levels by 2050.5 Using t his approach , t he City of Riverside is setti ng its 2035 GHG emissions goal to 49% below the 2007 baselineu (p. B.2-15). 34

9.20 As demonstrated in the excerpt above, the RG-CAP sets a 2035 emissions reductio n target of 49% below ~ 2007 baseline emissions . Howev er, review of the DEIR demonstrates that the Project fails to ment ion or demons t rate comp liance with this goal whatsoever. Whi le the DEIR includes a list discussing compliance w ith various strategies / goals of the RG-CAP, the DEIR fails to mention or provide substantia l evidence of a 49% emissions reduction from t he 2007 baseline. As such, t he DEIR's GHG analysis and subsequ ent less-than-significant impact conclusion shou ld not be relied upon and an updated EIR should instead demons t rate comp liance with the RG-CAP.

9.21 3) Failure to Consider Performance-based Standards Under CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan As previously discussed, the DEIR relies upon the Project's consistency with CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan to determ ine Project GHG significance {p. 5.7-28- 5.7-40). Howev er, t his is incorrect, as the DEIR fails to consider performance-based measures proposed by CARB.
i. Passenger & Ligh t Duty VMT Per capita Benchma rks per SB 375 In reach ing the State' s long-term GHG emission red uction goals, CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan explicitly cites to SB 375 and the VMT reduc tions anticip ated under the implementat ion of Sustainabl e Community Strategies .35 CARB has identified the population and daily VMT from passenger autos and light-duty vehides at the state and county level for each year between 2010 to 2050 under a Nbaselin e scenario " that includes Ncurrent project ions of VMT included in t he exist ing Regional Transportatio n Plans/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCSs) adopted by the State 's 18 Metropolitan Planning Organ izations (MPOs) pursuant to SB 375 as of 2015.""' By dividing the projected daily VMT by the popu lation, we calculated the daily VMT per capita for each year at the state and county level for 2010 (baseline year), 2022 (Project operational year), and 2030 (target years unde r SB 32) (see table below). 9' "Rive rside Restor ative ~ : Economic Prosp erity Action Plan and C~mate Action Pla n.• City of Riverside , January 2016, available ,a:
hnps://corweb.riversideca .eov/cedd/sites/r iveni deca .gov.cedd/files/pdf/plannine/other ­ pla ns/ 2016%20fU,;erside9620Restora tive%20Growthpr int9620Econom ic9620Proposerity%20Action9620Plan%20and 9620Climat e'l620Action9620Plan.pdf.
35 NCalifomia's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan.• CA.RB, November 2017, available at:
hnps://ww3 .a rb.ca.gov/cc/scopin eplan/scopine plan 2017.pdf p. 2S, 98, 101-103 . 96 "Supporting Calculations for 2017 Scoping Plan-Identif ied VMT Reduct ions,• Excel Sheet ~Readme. • CARB, January 2019, available at: hnps:ljww2.arb.ca .gov/sites/d efau lt/fi les/20 19- 01/s p mss vmt calrul ations jan19 0.xlsx.
20 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-145

9.21 ~ --.

9.22 RVA
-
2017 Scoping Plan Daily VMT Per C-apita
San Bernardino County State
Year Population LDV VMT Baseline VMTPer Population LDV VMT Baseline VMTPer Capita c.apita
2010 2,043,484 55,741,307. 23 27.28 37,335,085 836,463,980.4 6 22-40 2022 2,278,414 61,507,949.89 27.00 41,321 ,565 916,01 0,14 5.57 22.17 2030 2,478,888 65,538,854 .28 26.44 43,939 ,250 957,178,153 .19 21.78 As the DEIR fails to evaluate the Project's consistency with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan performa nce- '--
based daily VMT per capita projections, the DEIR's claim that the propos ed Project would not conflict with the CARB 2017 Scoping Plan is unsup ported . An updated EIR should be prepared for the propo sed ProJect to provide additional informatio n and analysis to conclude less-than-signific ant GHG impacts.

Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstra tes that th e Project would result in potenti ally significant air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts th at should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce the Project's emissions, we identi fied several mitigat ion measures that are applica ble to the proposed Proj ect.

Feasible mitigat ion measures can be found in the Departme nt of Justice Warehouse Project Be.st Practic es document. 37 Therefore, to reduce the Project' s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made :
• Requiring off-road construc tion equipment to be zero-emission, where available, and all diesel­ fueled off- road construct ion equipment, to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compli ant engines or bette r, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful corttr actors demonstratin g the ability to supply the compliant construction equipm ent for use prior to any ground-distur bing and constructio n activities. • Prohibiting off-road diesel-power ed equipment from being in the uon» positi on for more than 10 hours per day .
• Requiring on-road hea11V·duty haul trucks to be mod el year 2010 or new er if diesel-fue led. • Prov iding electrica l hook ups to the power grid, rathe r than use of diesel-fuel ed generators, for electric construct ion tools, such as saws, drills and compressors, and using electric tools whenever feasible.
• Limiti ng the amou nt of daily grading disturb ance area. • Prohi biting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for part iculates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than two minutes . • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classificatio ns.
37 •warehous e Projects: Best Practices and Miti gation, Measures to Comply with the California Environme nta l Quality Act. w State• of California Depanment of Justice. 21 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-146

9.22 ~
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compl iance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportu nities to furth er reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectura l coat ings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volati le organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.
• Providing informa tion on transit and rideshar ing pmgrams and services to constructio n employees.
• Provid ing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
• Requiring that all facility-owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site meet or exceed 2010 mode l-year emissions equivalent engine standards as currently defined in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025. Facility operators shall maintain records on-site demonstrating compl iance with this requirement and shall make records available for inspection by the local jurisdictio n, air distri ct, and state upon requ est. • Requiri ng all heavy-duty vehicles enter ing or operated on the project site to be zero-.emission beginning in 2030.
• Requiring on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be electric w ith the necessary electrica l charging stations provided.
• Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than two minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
• Posting both interi or- and exter ior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact inform ation to report violations to CARB, the air district, and the building manager.
• I nstalling and maintaining, at the manufacturer's recommended maintenance inteNals, air filtr ation systems at sensitiv e. receptors withi n a certain radius of facility for th e life of the project .
• I nstalling and maintaining, at the manufacturer's recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring statio n proxim ate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the proj ect, and making the resulting data publicly available in real tim e. Whil e air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefrts the affected commun ity by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
• Constructing electric truck charging stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrige,a t ion units at every dock door, if the warehouse use could include. refr igeration.
• Constructing electri c light-duty vehicle charging stat ions proport ional to the number of parking spaces at the project.
22 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-147

9.22 ~

9.23 RVA
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electr ical generatio n capacity, such as equal to the building's projecte d energy needs. • Requiring all stand~by emergency generators to be powered by a non~ iesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eli minate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks_ • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single­ occupancy vehicl e trips and provides fin ancial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, publ ic transit, and biking.
• Meeting ~ Tier 2 green build ing standards, includi ng all provis ions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Achieving certificatio n of com pl ia nee with LEED green building standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttl es behve en the facility and nearby meal destinations . • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional informat ion to the tru ck route . • Improvi ng and maintai ning vegetatio n and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel t echnologies and compl iance with CARB regulations, by attend ing ~ courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records o~ite demonst rating compli ance and make records available for inspection by the local j urisdict ion, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmenta l Protection Agency's SmartWay progra m, and requiring tenants to use carriers that are SmartWay carri ers. • Providing tenants with informa tion on incentive programs, such as the earl Moyer Program and Vouch er Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design feat ures into the proposed Project , w hich subsequently , reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation . An updat ed EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation me,a:sures, as well as include updated air quality and health risk analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigatio n measures are impleme nted to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The updat ed EIR should also demonst rate a commitmen t to the implementa tion of these measures prior to Project approva,I, to ensure that the Proj ect's significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery reg.arding th is proj ect. Addition al inform ation may become available in the Mure; thus, we reta in the right to revise or amend this report w hen additiona l information becomes available. Our professional services have been perfo rmed using that degree of care and skill ordi narily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environm ental consultants practic ing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implie d, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditio ns, analytical test ing results, and findings presented _ This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the tim e of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or 23 Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-148

9.23 ~
otheru.rise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of informa tion obtained or provide<:! by t hird parties.

Sincerely,
/tf /Ju t--,-u <--
Matt Hagemann, P.G., &:Jjg.

Paul E Rmenfeld, Ph.D.

Attachm ent A:. Air Modeling Calculations
Attachme nt B: ~ Output Files
Attachme nt C: Health Risk Calculations
Attachme nt D: AERSCREE.N Output Files
Attachme nt E.: Matt Hagemann CV
Attac hment D: Paul E. Rmenfeld
24 RVA
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-149

RVA
Pnase
Site Prep
Gra.ding
Constructi on
Paviflg
Coating
Vehide Type·
LDA
LDTl
LDT2
MDV
V,ehid e Type,
LHDl
LHD2
MHD
HI-ID
Attachment A
Construction Schedule Calculations
Default Phase
Length
Total Defaul t
Length
30 146
75 146
740 1189
55 1189
55 1189
Passenger car Fleet Mix Calculations
Default Fleet Mix
% Total Fleet Mix%

0.552111

0.043066 0:91558

0.201891

0.118512
Truck Fleet Mix Calculations
Default Fleet M~
% Total Fleet Mix %

0.015605

0.005863 0.074108

0.021387

0.031253
Revised Total
% Lef\gth

0.205479452

0.513-69&63

0.622371741

0.046257359·
90 90
365
365

0.046257359· 365
Revised Fleet
Mix$6

0.603017759

0.047036851

0.220506127

0.129439263
Revised Fleet
M°IX%

0.21 0.08

0.29 0.42
Revi.ed Phase
Lerlgth
u
4E
221
11 11
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-150

Attachment B
~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3 09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars south Coast Air Basin, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
l
Size
l
Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I
General Office Building 1000sqft 0.46 20,000.00
----------"'T----Unrefngerated Warehous-e-No Rail --,r--------1000sqft -t------------~---------------- Population
0 0
-------■

20.00 583.10

16.00 8.18
1 15.54 : 583,100.00 :
-·------------~----------------~-------! Other AsphaH Surfaces ---------------Parking Lot

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (mis)
Climate Zone 10
Utility Company Riverside Publlc Utilllies
CO2 Intensity 1325.65 CH-4 Intensity
(Utt~ (Utt~

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

2.2 0.029
Acre
Acre
I 16.00 ' 696,960.00
-i-----i 18-----1----356,320~8-0 - - - --r
Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Yea.r 2022
N20 Intensity 0.006
(UII~
0 0
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-151

,C,ijll;f;~Q(J.. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 712012021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics -See SWAPE comment regarding CO2. CH4, and N2O intensity factors.

Construction Phase -Total construction length consistent with information provided in the DEIR, but phase lengths are~ altered.

Vehicle Trips -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Grading -
Trips and VMT -See SWAPE comment regarding vendor and worker trip numbers.

Architectural Coating -See SWAPE comment regarding architectural coating emission factors.

Fleet Mix -See SWAPE comment regarding operational vehicle fleet mix. Only passenger cars. Trucks reduced to O; passenger car percentages proportionally altered based on ~defaults. See construction calculations.

Energy Use-
Water And Wastewater -See SWAPE comment regarding indoor water use rate.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding the PM10 and PM2.5 % reductions.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name ] Column Name ] Default Value ]
lRICAA.~».I;,, ~ 55.00
~ • ~ " 740.00
New Value

17.00 -
227.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'------- ~ ~ 75.00 46.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~----- ~ ~ 55.00 17.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ ~ 30.00 18.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------;------- ~ ~ 1112712024 - 612912022
. ., ~------- ~ ,. ~ ,, 612612024 5/1212022
--------------------------,-------------------------,--------------------------~------ ~ " ~ " 812512021 612912021
------~------r--------~-------<----------9M1noii_________ : 616/2022 --------------------------~-------------------------~--------------------------._ _____ _ ~ : ~ • 511212021 412612021
~ r ~ 1 9/1212024 617/2022
. .
~ . --·-. . eb.l~~ 812612021 6/3012021
---~ ---r ---~----~ -----5,1312021 - - - -l 412712021 I ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-152

~ Version· GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page3of35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM ~ 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual ____ --~-____ _[ _______ -~ _______ ]_ _________ ~~~~~2_4 _________ 1 5113/2022 I ~ : HHD : 0.03 : 0.00
----------~ ---------: -----------HHD-----------~------------0.03 -----------: 0.00 --------------------------•-------------------------<--------------------------,-------------~ ~ LOA 0.55 0.60
I ~ i LOA i 0.55 . 0.60
1 - - - - - - - - --~ - - - - - - ---r-----------l~~1-- - - - - - - - --r-- - - - - - - - - -~~4----------i 0.05 1 ~ LDT1 0.04 0.05
. . ----------~iwi---------, -----------Loi2-----------~------------020 -----------

0.22 1- - - - - - - - ---~-=----.: .~ ----------~ -------------~~------------..,------------~ :_· -----------'-, -------------1 ~ LDT2 0.20 0.22
---------------------------------------------------<--------------------------:-------------~ ~ LHD1 • 0.02 0.00
---------------------------------------------------'--------------------------:-------------~ ~ LHD1 : 0.02 , _________ -~ ____________________ ~~~2-__________ j_ ________ :~s~~o_e:°_o~-_______ j o.oo I •. ·----------0.00

0.00 ~ LHD2 5.8630e--003
. .
~ : -----------Mcv-----------: 4.so3oe--003 0.00
1--------------------------,-------------------------,---------------------------------------~ ~ MCY 4.8030e--003 0.00 ----------~--------------------Mov-----------
1 ------------0.12 __________ ! 0.13 I
~ MDV 0.12 0.13
1 --------------------------_________________________ , _________________________ _ - - - - - - - - --=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --~~ - - - - - - - - - --i-- - - - - - - -~-:::;:;:;-- - - - - - --:-

0.00 0.00
I~:~~~~~:~~·~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~-~~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ,-------------1 ~ MHD : 0.02

0.00 . . --------------------------,-------------------------,--------------------------.-------------~

0.00 ~ OBUS 2.0870e--003 0.00
----------~ --------- -----------OBUS ----------~---------2-osloe::0-03---- --- - -0.00 I ~ SBUS ; 7.0SOOe--004 0.00
~ SBUS 1 7.0SOOe--004 0.00
. .
~ ; UBUS ; 1.8180e--003 0.00
-~ -- -- -----r--- --------UBUS ----------1--------· 1~s1soe::Oo3-- - - - - - -i I 0.00 City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-153

Qllll;l;;MOO-Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4of35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual ----------~---------l---------~---------1-----------~~:~----------I I ~ : CC_TL : 8.40

15.54 24.20
-------------------------->-------------------------~--------------------------,---------------1 ~ CC_TL 8.40 24.20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,---------------1 ~ CNW_TL 6.90 24.20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------c--------------1 ~ CNW_Tl 6.90 24.20
---------------------------------------------------------- ~ CW_Tl 16.60 24.20 . .
~ =----------cw_i-i: __________ : 16.60

24.20 --------------------------,---------------------------------------------------'---------------1 ~ ST_TR 2.46 0.95
-------------------------->-----------------------------------------------------------------i ~ ST_TR 1.68 0.95
--------------------------~---------------------------------------------------,--------------i ~ : SU_TR 1.05 0.95
~ f SU_TR 1.68 0.95
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------,--------------1 ~ WO_TR 11.03 0.95
---------~ ------------------wo~rR----------------------iiii-----------r 0.95

2.0 Emissions Summary
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-154

.Q,ijll;f;MR:IJ.. Version: calEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 712012021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south coast Air Basin, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
Year
2021
2022
Maximum
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive l Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
10<1"°'¥<.

Pl.110
Tcoal
Fugitive l Exhaust
Pt.12.5 PM2.5
F't.12.5
Total
Bio-c02 J ~ co2J Total co2
MT~
a-« N20 C02e

0.5040 ; 4.4881 ; 4.0782 ; 0.0130 ; O.Q888 ; 0.1353 ; 1.1241 ; 0.3412 ; 0.1259 ; 0.4670 : 0.0000 I 1_194.4gs; 1.1944118; 0.1277 ; 0.0000 ; 1.197.ellO I I I I I I I I I • 1 I 1 I I I 1
------~------:------~------~------:------~------~------~-----~------~------J------~------~-----~------: I 3.2316 : 2.1106 : 22983 , 8.~, 0.4525 , 0.0485 , 0.5010 , 0.1220 , 0.0455 , 0.1675 ; 0.0000 I 747.5735, 747.5735, 0.0589 , 0.0000 , 749.0453 32316 4.A381 4.0782 0.0130 0.9888 0.1353 1.1241 0.3412 0.125S 0.4670 0.0000 I 1,194.49811,194.49s 1 0.12n 1 1

0.0000 I 1,191_s90
1 Mitigated Construction
Year
2021
2022
Maximum
Percent
Reduction
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Elchoust
PM10 Pr.110
10<1"°'¥<.

Pl.110
Tcoal
Fugitive I l:Jcheusl
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5
F't.12.5
Total
Bio-c02 I tililiA-co2j TCMaJ co2
MT~
CH-4 N20 C02e

0.5040 ; 4.4881 ; 4.0782 ; 0.0130 ; 0.Q888 ; 0.1353 ; 1.1241 ; 0.3412 ; 0.1259 ; 0.4670 : 0.0000 11,194.497; 1.194.497; 0.1277 ; 0.0000 ; 1,197.689 : I 7 7 8
-i2i1e -~ -2.1-100 -:--22983-~ -s~,oc,o;; ~ -0.-1525 -:--0~0485-~ -0.0010 -~ -0.1220 -:--0~045<>-~ --0~1675-:--0~0000-i-747.5733 ~ 747~5733-:--o~o58i ~ -0.0000 -~ 32316
ROG

0.00 1 1 1 003 , , , 1 1 , ~ I 1 1 , ,

4.4881 4.0782 0.0130 0.9888 0.1353 1.1241 0.3412
NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.1259 0.4670
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 To1al

0.00 0.00

0.0000 ( 1,194.49711,194.497 ( 0.1277
7 7
Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 ToblC02 CH4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0000 ( 1,197.689
8 N20 C02e

0.00 0.00
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-155

~f;f;;MQIJ,. Version. GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page6 of35 Date 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Quarte< StartOat. End Oat. Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarte<) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/qu-r) 1 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 1.51110 1.51110
2 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 1.6707 1.6707
3 1D-1-2021 12-31-2021 1Jl858 1.6858
4 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 1.5280 1.5280
5 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 3.7137 3.7137
Highest 3.7137 3.7137

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
CategO<Y
-·
Energy
~1ot,;le
Waste
Weter
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 PM10
IO<WYk
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM25 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I~ co21 1o1s1 co2
MTl\o<,
CH4 N20 C02e

2.5423
1 7.0000e-: s.02ooe-: 0.0000
1 1
J.OOOOe-: 3.000()e.. : : iOOOOe-: 3.0000e-: 0.0000 I 0.0156 • 0.0156 : 4.0000e-: o.OCOO : 0.0166 100510031 l 1005,0051 10051005: I I ,005, I
e.760Qle. :--0.0614 -:-(lj)51_6_ -:-3~1000e: :-------:-4.6100e: -:-4~670Ck!---·:· ------:-4.6•ioo;_ -:-4.61'oo; -r-o~oooo-1-,~08i813 ·:· 1.083~a13 :--0~0235 -:-s.83~ ·: 1,086.1381 000
1 1 1
004
1 1
003
1 003
1 1
003
1 000 14,4
1 :003
1 s
-o.;673 -:--0.3909 -:--4~356◄--:-0.01-es -:--1~i47i -:--o~o11J--: -1.7590 -!" -0.4640 -; -0~0-104--:--0~4-.,43--:-0~0000-,-1~51i4Q3 ~ 1,5,8~493:--Q~0-320 -:-0.0000 -I 1,51Q_N.2 " I 8 8 7
------~ ------:------~ ------~ ------:--o~o"ooo-~ -0.0000 -:------~ -0~()()()0 ~--0~0000--: 115.0310 ,-0.0000 -: 11~~0010-~ -e~7~; ~-o.0000-~ : : : : : : : : : : I : : : :
------~ ------:------~ ------~ ------:--o~o"ooo-~ -0.0000 -; ------~ -o~OOOO ~ --o~CXX>O--:-43.9008 1-1~09& i42; 1.142049 ~ -4~5-337-~ -0.1115-~, -1-.2-ss ___ 004--t

2.7164
, , , t 1 1 : : : ■ I 7 : 5 : : 1 4

0.4524 4.4160 0.0171 1.7477 0.0160 1.7637 0.4640 0.0151 0.4790 158.9439 I 3,100.46513,859.409 I 11.as11 4 3

0.1173 I 4.179.051
6 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-156

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.32 Page 7 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
CalegO!'f
Area
Energy
~tobil@
Wa.ste
Wsfe,
TotJI
Pe<ce-nt
Reduction
ROG NOx co S02 Fugrtive I Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
t~
PM10
Total
Fugrtive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2_5
PM2,5
Total
Bio-C02 lllli!iR-C021 Total002
MT~
c~ N20 C02e

2.5423 ; 7.~ I 8.~ I 0.0000 ; ; 3.~-; 3.~ 1 : 3.~ : 3.~ : 0.0000 I 0.015e : o.0·150 : 4.~-: 0.0000 : 0.0166 I I I • I I l ' I : I I I ' I
------~------1------~------~------~-----~------~------~-----4-------,------------·------~-----4---------- 6.7600e-, 0.0614 , 0.0516 , 3.7000e-, , 4.6700.-, 4.6700e-, , 4.6700e-, 4.6700e-• o_oooo I 1,083.813, 1,083.813, 0.0235 , 5.8300e-, 1,086.138 0031 I 10041 100310031 10031 003: 4 I 4 I 10031 5
------~------:------~------~------~-----~------~------~-----~-------~ _____ J ______ ! ______ ~-----~-------'---~

0.1673 • 0.3909 ' 4.3564 ' 0.0168 • 1.74n • 0.0113 ' 1.7590 ' 0.4640 ' 0.0104 • 0.4743 : 0.0000 I 1,518.493' 1,518.493 • 0.0320 ' 0.0000 ' 1,519.292 : : : : : : : : : : I 8 : 8 : : : 7
------l------•------J------~------~-----J------L------L-----~-------~------------1------L-----~------~--- 1 1 1 1 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 115.0370 I 0.0000 : 115.0370 : 6.7985 : 0.0000 : 284JXlQ3 I I I I I • I I : I I I ' I
__ ----·-______ 1 _______ 1 ______ 1 ______ -·-_____ -'-_____ _._ --__ --·-_____ -·-_____ -~ _ ------_____ .•. _____ -·-___ --_,_ --___ .I~ : : : : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 43.Q068 I 1,008.142: 1,142.040: 4.5337 : 0.1115 : 1,288.604

2.7164 0.4524 4-4160 0,0171 1-74n 0,0160 1,7637
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust
PM10 PM10
0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
: I 7 5 4
OA640 0.0151 OA790 158,94JS I 3,700,46513,859A09 I 11,38TT 0.11n I 4,119.os1 6 4 3
PM10 Fugitiv• Exhaust PM2-5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 c~ N20 CO2~ Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-157

~ Version· GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase
Number
Phase Name
: Site Preparation
Phase Type Start Date
: Stte Preparation : 41112021
End Date
: 4126/2021
'
Num Days I Num Days
Week
s: 1a:

Phase Description
2-----~G;ading----------------~G;ading---------------:4'27/2021-----:-6129/2021----:· ------i-----4s: I • • l I I I ':-------------•
3 : Building Construction : Building Construction : 6130/2021 : 5112/2022 ' 5: 221:
■ ■ I I I I I
------1---------------------•--------------------i-----------~----------r-------r-------;~------------- 4 :Paving :Paving : 5113/2022 : 6/6/2022 : s: 17,r: --------------1 : Archttectural Coating : Architectural Coating 5
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): o
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 115
Acres of Paving: 24.18
6fl/2022 6129/2022 s 17
Residential Indoor: o; Residential outdoor: o; Non-Residential Indoor: 904,650; Non-Residential outdoor: 301,550; Striped Parking Area:
63,197 (Architectural Coating -~
QttRoa(I, Equipment
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-158

~ Version: CaJEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name ] ~Equipmenl Type ] Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Faclor Sile Preparalion : Rubber Tired Ooze rs 3: 8.00: 247: 0.4C • I I I
Site-Pr~p;r;1io~ --------------:r;a~lo~o~d;~IB;~kh~;s------: --------------4:---------s~oo·: ----------ii1: 0.31 ------------------------•-----------------------•--------------~-----------1 ___________ I Grading :Exca,alors : 2: s.oo: 1ss: 0.3,
• I I I I
G~ad~g-------------------:o;;d~~s-- - - - - - - - --- --- - --y --------------1:---------8~0-0~ - --- - - - --181, 0.41 : I I
Grading ;RubberTireil Dozers : 1: 8.00: 247• 0.4(
• I I I I
Grading :scrapers ' 2: 8.00~ 367• 0.41
• I I I
------------------------~-----------------------~--------------~-----------~-----------Grading : Tractors/loaders/Backhoes : 2: 8.00: 97: 0.31 ------------------------~-----------------------~--------------J-----------~----------- Building Conslruclion :Cranes : 1: 7.oo: 231: 0.2!
------------------------~-----------------------i ______________ J ___________ i __________ _ Building Conslruclion : Forl<lifls 3: 8.00: ss: 0.2C
-~---------. ------------~-----------------------:--------------~-----------:-----------: Building Conslrucl1on ;Generalor Sets 1, 8.00, 84, 0. 7' e I I I I
Building Conslruclion ;Tractors/loaders/Backhoes : 3: 7.oo: 97:
• I I I I

0.3?
------------------------~-----------------------,--------------~-----------,-----------, Building Conslruclion :Welders 1, 8.00, 46, 0.4! ------------------------,-----------------------T--------------,-----------T-----------Paving :Pa,ers , 2• 8.00• 130• • I I I
------------------------<-----------------------~---------------1-----------~-----------~-------1 Paving :Paving Equipment 2: 8.00: 132:
------------------------~-----------------------~---------------1-----------·-----------~-------I Paving :Rollers • 2: s.oo: ao: 0.
;;chite~tu;ai c~;ti-;,9 -----------1Ai"r c~;;,p;e;;;r;------------1--------------ir--------6~0-01----------,s o.4, Trips and VMT
Phase Name
I
~Equipmenl
Count
Worl<erTrip
Number
Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip
Number Number
Worl<erTrip
Lenglh
Vendor Trip
Lenglh
Hauing Trip
Lenglh
Worl<er Vehicle
Class
Vendor I Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
, Srte Preparation 7, 18.00, o.oo, o.oo, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00:~ :~ ,HHDT G;a"°dtng---------=------------~------io~o-o:------0.00:------ooii:------14.70~------6-90~ -----20~00~~ ------~~---, HHOT • I I t I I I I I I
B~.ildin9-c~~;hu~tio_n _: ------------~ -----694~0-o: -----211.00:------0.0~ ------14.70:-------6~9o:-- ---20~00: ~ ------: ~---: HHOT ~-------------!------------~---------~---------•--------~---------~---------►--------►.~---------~---------I Paving s: 15.oo: o.oo: o.oo: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:~ :~ : HHDT A;chit;c;;,~;IC~;ting-- - - - - - --- - --11--- --139~0-01------0.0(r-----00~------,4.701--- ----6~90r-----2o~oor~ --- - --1~-. I HHDT I ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-159

~~MOO-Version: GalEEMod 2016_3.2 Page 10of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co
Catego,y
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 f't.110
tonstv,r.

Pl.110
Tolal
Fugitive I Exhsust
Pl.12.5 Pt.12.5
PM2_5
Total
Fugitive Dust , 0.1626 , 0JlOO0 , o_ 1626 , 0.0894 , 0.0000 , 0.0894 --Off~~d---1r -Q,()35fl -:--0~:3645-~ -0.1004 -~ -3~oci);_-~ -----~ -()j);84 -~ -Q.01-84 -~ ------:--O~oi69-~ -():-0:j6Q- . ' . 004 I I I I • •
Totil 0.0350 0.3645 0.1004 1 3.4000<>-1 0.1626
004

0.0184 0.1810 0.0894 0.0169 0.1063
Bi<>-002 I WiR-0021 Tot.10021 CH4 N20 C02e
MT/w,..

0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000
:-- - - - -• - - ----~ - - - - --1-- - - - -.. ---- - -I 0.0000 • 30.0922 ° 30.0922 • 9.7300e-• 0.0000 • 30.3355 003 '

0.0000 I 30.0922 I 30.0922 I S.7300e-I 0.0000 I 30.3355 003
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-160

~~MOO-Version. GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distritlution center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
HaulillQ
Vendor
Waker
Total
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pt.110
I~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
S.o-C02 l~C02I TolalC02 CH4 N20
MTl\u_

0.0QOO I 0.0000 I 0.0QOQ I 0.0000 I Q,OOQO I Q,OOQO I Q.OOOQ I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I Q.0000 Q.QOOO I Q.OOOQ I Q.OOOQ I Q,OQOO I Q,OQOO I -0.0000 -:--o~OOOO-~ -0.0000-: -0.0000 -~ -o~OOOO -:-0:0000-: -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-0-0000-~ -i(>cxio--.-0~0000-: -0.0000 -~ -O.<X>OO -:-0-00Ci>-~ -0.0000 -, C02e

0.0000

0.0000
______ 1 ______ J ______ i ______ L ______ , ______ i ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ ~ ______ i ______ L ______ 1 ______ J _________ _

6.7000@. I [email protected]@--2.0QOOe--I 1.7800@• I 1.~ I 1.7Q()()e. I 4.70Q0e-I 1.00QOe.. I 4.~ ■ Q.OOOQ I 1.5498 I 1.5498 I 4.0000@• I 0.0QOO I ~,~a~•~•~•••~•~ ~ ~ .

6.7000e· I 5.0000e-1 5.6500e-I 2.0000e-, 1.7800e-, 1.0000e-I 1.7900e-I 4.7000 ... , 1.oooo ... , 4.8000e- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.0000 1.5498 U498 I 4.0000e· I 0.0000
005

1.5508

1.5508
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fvgitive0"51
Off.Road
Tot.al
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhausl
PM10 Pl,110
tonsi\u,
PMIO
Tolal
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.12.5 Pl,12.5
PM2.5
Total
, 0.16:le • 0.0000 • 0:1626 , 0.0894 , 0.0000 , 0.0894

0.0350 ' 0.3645 ' 0.1904 ' 3.4000e-•
004

0.0350 0.3645 o.1so4 1 3_4000,.. 1 o.1s26
004
' 0.0184 ' 0.0184 '

0.0184 0.1810
' 0.01 eg ' 0.01 eg

0.0894 0.0169 0.1063
Bio-co2l~cc2I Tota1co2 CH4 N20 C02e
MT~

0.0000 , 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000
:· ooo<x> ~ .30:-00i1 -~ 30.0021 ~. g1300e: ~. 00000., 30.33~ 1 I 003 I

0.0000 1 30_0921 1 30_0921 1 s_1300e. 1 0.0000
003

30.3354
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-161

~Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
HatJling
Vendor
Waker
Total
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMtO PMIO
~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.t2.5
Total
Bio-C02 l~C02I Total CO2 I CH4 N20 C02e
MTiv,.,

0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 O.OOCIO 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
------•------~------♦------►------•------•------►-----~------◄------~------♦------►------1------ ◄---------~ =:=:=:=:=:=:~:~:=:=;=:~:~:~:~:~
I I I I I I I I I ■ l I I I I
______ 1 ______ J ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ i ______ L-----~------J------~------~------L ______ 1 ______ J ______ 1 I

6.7:-: 5.c:e-
1 5.6:
1 2.~e-: 1.7~~-
1 1.~e-: 1.1:-
1 4.7:-: 1.~: 4.~ • 0.0000
1 1.54Q8
1 1.54Q8
1 4.~-
1 0.0000 I 1.5508

6.1000e-1 s.ooooe--1 s.6500e--I 2.ooooe--I 1.1s00e-11.ooooe--I 1.1s00e-1 4.7000e-11.0000e--I 4.soooe-- 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004

0.0000 1.5498 1.5498 I 4.0000e-I 0.0000
005

1.5508

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
Category
Fugnive Dusi
Off-Road
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl.110 Pl.110
ton~
PM10
Tolal
Fugnive I Exhausl
Pl.12.5 Pl.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02l~C021 TclalC02 CH4 N20 C02e
MT/vF.

I Q;lQl)5 I 0.00QO I Q.1Ql}5 I 0.0827 I Q,OOQO I 0.082] : Q.OOOQ I 0.0000 I 0.00QO I Q.OOOQ I Q.OQOO I Q.0000 I I I I I I • I I I I I
• I I I I I
-0 0964 -:--1-<ii2-~ -0 7lo2 -~ -1~4300;._ -~ -----~ -0 0457-~ -0 0457 -~ ------:--o~04.io-~ -0 0420-~-0~000)-~ 125-3j85-~ 1i"5-a3i5 ~ -0:0405-~ -0.0000 -: 126 351g 1 • ' • ' • ' 003 I " I • I I I ' • I • I • I • • •

0.0964 1.0672 0.1102 I 1.4300 ... I 0.1995
003

0.0457 0.2452 0.0827 0.0420 0.1247 0.0000 I 12s.3385 I 125.3385 I o.0405 0.0000 I 126.3519 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-162

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Ha1Jling
Vendor
waker
Toti.I
ROG 1-K>x co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
~
PM10
Total
Fugitive j Exheust
PM2 5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 J ~ CO2 J Total CO2 J C4-l4 N20 C02e
MTJ\tl-

0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ______ 1 ______ .J ______ J. _____ -L ______ 1 ______ J. ______ L. ______ , ______ .J ______ _; ______ J. ______ 1.. ______ 1 ______ .J ______ '-----t

0.000Q: I Q.OOQO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.QOOO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 - - - - - -:- - - - - --:-- -_-- --:· - - - - --:-- - - - - -:- - - - - --:· - - - - - -:-- - - - - -:- - - - - --:-- - - - -~-- - - - --:· - - - - --:-- - - - - -:- - - - - --:--- - - -: I 1,910Qe-I 1.4200e-I 0,0161 I 5,00QOe-I 5,050Qe--I 4,000Qe-I 5,QSQOe-I 1.3400e-I 4,0QOOe--I \.380Qe-■ Q.CIQOQ I 4,4006 I 4,4006 I 1.200Qe-I Q,QOOO I 4.4006 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 • 004

1.S100e-, 1.4200e-1 0.0161
003 003

5.oooo ... I 5.0500... I 4.oooo ...
1 5.oaoo ...
1 1.3400... I 4.oooo ... I 1.3800 ...
005 003 005 003 003 005 003

0.0000 4.4006 4.4006 1 1.2000e-1 0.0000
004

4.4036
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
ROG 1-K>x co S02 Fugitive Exhau5t
Pl.110 Pl,110
ton~
Pl.110
TcCal
Fugitive I ExhoU>t
Pl.12.5 Pl,12.5
PM2.5
Total
s;o.co2l~co2I Tota1co2
MTIV!-
C4-l4 N20
: o.1G95 : 0.0000 : o.1gg5 : o.oa21 : 0.0000 : o.oa21 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 :

I I I I I I I I I I I
C02e

0.0000
______ 1 ______ J ______ L------L-----J------~------L------·------~------------L------L-----J------~------' I O.OQ64 : 1.0672 : 0.7102 : 1.4: : : 0.0457 : 0.0457 : : 0.04.20 : 0.0420 0.0000 : 125.3383: 125.3383: 0.0405 : 0.0000 : ·126.3517

0.0964 1.0672 0.1102 1 1.-:;i:--1 0.1995 0.0457 0.2452 0.0827 0.0420 0.1247 0.0000 I 125.3383 I 125.3383 I o.0405 0.0000 I 126.3511 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-163

~ Version: GalEEMod 2016.3.2 Page 14of35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROGII co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 P'-110 P'-110 Total PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio-002 I ()1£1iq-0021 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I C02e Category ton~ MT!\:,.

Ha:uliog 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 : 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 I Q.OQOO 0.0000 I I 1 I I I I I I ; I I I I I
______ • ______ J ______ J ______ L-----~------l------L-----~------J------~------J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ , I =:=:=:=:=:=:=:~:=:~;=:=:~:=:~· Vendor
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
t-I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
Worker II 1.0100e-: 1.4200e-: 0.0161 : 5.0000e-: 5.0500e-: 4.0000e-: 5.0BOOe-: 1.3400e-: 4.0000e- 1 l.3800e-: OJK)()O : 4.4006 : 4.4006 : L2000e-
1 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 • 004
Q.OQOO I
Total 1.9100e-1.4200e-0.0161 5.0000e-5.0500e-4.0000e-5.0800e-1.3400... 4.0000e-1.3800e- 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003
::J

4.4006
I UO-OG I 1~-1 0.0000 I

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co
category
Off.Rood 0.1264 1.1592 1.1023
Total 0.1264 1.1592 1.1023
S02 Fugitive Exhaust
PM10 P!.110
ton~

1.7900:e-: 0.0638
003 '

1.7900e-0.0638
003
PM10 Fvgitive Exheust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 WR CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I Tolel P'-12.5 PM2.5 Total
MT/I!):.

0.0638 0.059ll 0.059ll 0.0000 154.0388: 154.0388: 0.0372 0.0000

0.0638 0.0599 0.0599 0.0000 154.0388 154.0388 0.0372 0.0000

0.0000

4.4038

4.4036
C02e
154.9679
154.9679
~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-164

~Version: GalEEMod2016.3.2 Page 15of35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Wor-ker
Toi.ii
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitil,e I Exhaust
PMIO PM10
lons.'lc,r.

PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
F't,12.5
Total
Bio-co2 l~co2I To1.o1co2
MTJ\I<.

CH4 N20 C02e

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I
------~-----J ______ J ______ L-----~------l------~-----~------J------~------1------~-----~------J ______ l I

0.0518 : 1.7530 : 0.4430 : 4.5100e-: 0:1136 : 3.5700e-: 0.1171 : 0.0328 : 3.4100e-: 0.0362 : 0.0000 : 437.5730: 437.5730: 0.0282 : 0.0000 : 438.2701 I 0031 ()()3 0031 • 1
--4 ---,---~ --~ ---:---~ --~ ---:---+ ---■------r --~ ---,---T --~---- 0.1018 I 0.1424 I 1.6·106 I 4.880Qe-I Q.5003 I 3.820Qe-I 0.5102 I 0.1345 I 3.52QOe--I 0.1.J8Q : 0.00QQ I 441.5045 I 441.5045 I 0.011Q I 0.0000 t 441.8015

0.2436 1.8953
003 003 003
2_0531 I 9.3900•-1 0.619s 11.39ooe-I 0.6213
003 003

0.1612 I 6.93ooe­
oo3

0.1742 0.0000 I 879.0183 I s19_01s3 I o.0401 0.0000 I aoo.oao6 Mitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMI0 Fugitive ExhaLISI PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~ CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I C02e PMIO F't,110 Total PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category ton~ MT/YT,.

Off-Road 0.1264 ' 1.11ill2 ' 1.1023 I 1.JQOOe-:
003
' 0.0638 ' 0.0638 ' Q_050Q I 0.05QQ 0.0000 1 154.0386 : 154.0386: 0.0372 0.0000 154.ll677 .

TotaJ 0.1264 1.1592 1.1023 1.7900e-0.0638 0.0638 0.0599 0.0599 0.0000 15,U386 154.0386 0.0372 0.0000 154.9677 003
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-165

~Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fu9iWe I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
ton~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12 5
Total
Bio-C02 l~C02I TolalC02
MT~
CH4 N20 002e
HatJling 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' I I I I I I I I I : I I I I
Vendor 0.0518 :--,~1530--:-o.4430-·: -4~5-;~-:--o~ 1-136 -,-isr"ooe: ·: -0.11-11 -• -0.032s -:-i<i1"ooe: ·: --o:0Ji2--=--0~0000-·: -437~5739: ii1~5739_:_ o:om-·: -00000 -: 438.m, 003 003 I 003 :

I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
Wcrker - -~ - --,-- -r --~ ---,-- -r - --. - - -.-- -T ---•------r - --. ---,-- -T 0.1918 I 0.1424 O 1.6106 I 4.880Qe.. O 0.5063 I 3.820Qe-I 0.5102 I 0.1345 I 3.5200@• I 0.1380 : 0.000Q I 441.5045 I 441.5045 I 0.0119 I 0.0000 O 441.8015 003 003 003
Tot.I 02436 1.8953 2.0531 1 9.39ooe-j o.6199 f 1.3900 .. T 0.6213 003 003

0.16n T 6.9300 ..
003

3.4 Building Construction • 2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
Off.Rood 0.0802 0.7339 0.7691
Tot.I 0.0802 0.7339 0.7691
SO2
l.2700e-
003
12700e-
003
Fugitive Exhaust Pt.110 fugitive Exhaust
Pl.110 Pl.110 Tolal PM2.5 Pl.12.5
ton~

0.0380 0.0380 0.0358

0.0380 0.0380 0.0358

0.1742 0.0000 T 879.0183 T 879.0783 T o.0401 0.0000 l 880.0806 PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~CO2 TOUIIC02 CH4
Total I N20 I C02e
MT~

0.0358 0.0000 108.9109 , 108.9109, 0.0261 0.0000 109.5632 .

0.0358 0.0000 108.9109 108.9109 0.0261 0.0000 109.5832
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-166

~J;;fMQIJ, Version: calEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 1'1,110
lons/\1<.

PM10
Total
FugitiW! I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl,12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 [~C02j TotalC02j OH4 N20 002"
MT/\'k
Hauling ~:~:~:=:~:=:=:~:=:~:=:=:~:~:~:~
Vendor
Wori<er
Tota.I
------:------~------4------~-----~------~------~------:------~------~------4------~-----~------~------: I 0.0344 , 1.1756 , 0.21165 , 3.~, 0.0803 , 2-~-, 0.0825 , 0.02:32 , 2.~e-, 0.0253 : 0.0000 , 306.5308, 306.5308, 0.01112 , 0.0000 , 307.011g 0~273 ~ O.o~~-;-1.0s,2 7" a3300e-~ 0.3579-;-2.62o5;-~ Q.3oo°s-; 0.0950-;-2.4100~ 7

0.1617 1.2665
003 003 003

1.3476 I 6.4900•-I 0A381
003

4.8200 •• I o.4429
003

0.1182 1 4_5100 ••
003
. '
O.OQ7s-:-0~0000--:-300_,3641-: 300~1 ;-1.~-7 0.0000 I 301.0537 • 003

0.1227 0.0000 I 601_3949 I 601.3949 I 0.0268 0.0000 I 608.o6s6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PMI0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 BiD-CO2 b1eiR-CO2 T olal CO2 CH4 N20 C02e Pl,110 Pl,110 ToW PM2.5 1'1,12,5 Total
Category tons/y,I( MT~
Off-Road 0.0802 0.7339 0.76Q1 t.2700e-0.0380 0.0380 0.0358 0.0358 0.0000 108.9107 , 108.9107 , 0.0261 0.0000 109.5630 003
Tota.I 0.0802 0.7339 0.7691 1.2700e-0.0380 0.0380 0.0358 0.0358 0.0000 108.9107 108.9107 0.0261 0.0000 109.5630 003
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-167

~ Version: Ca!EEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore HIiis Distnbution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
category
Hauling
Vendor
--~
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pt.110
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
f't.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 ltiiPR-C021 TotolC02
lonsfV.<. I MT~
CH4 N20 C02e

0.0000 1 0.0000 ; Q_()()()Q ; 0.0000 1 Q_{)(X)Q 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 ------,------,------~------r------,------~------r------,------,-------------~------r-----~------,------, I o.0344 , 1.1156 1 o.2Q65 1 3.~e--. o.oso3 , 2.~ 1 0.0825 , 0.0232 , 2.~ 1 0.0253 : 0.0000 : 306.5308: 306.5308, o.01gi 1 0.0000 , ao1.0110 o-::i213 -0.0009-. -1.0512 -33Jooe-~ o.3579-:-2_02oo;_-:--0.3605 -0.0950--2..iioo;_ -0.0975-=--0~0000-~ aoo.8641-: m:iM, :-7.~--:-0.0000 , 301.0537 003 I 003 003 O I 003

0.1617 1.2665 1.3476 6.4900e-0.4381
003 4.s~<\t I o.4429 o.11s2 I 4.sc!i<\t 0.1227 0.0000 I 607.3949 I 607.3949 I 0.0268 0.0000 I 608.0656

3.5 Paving -2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Srte
category
Off'Road
Paving
Tobi
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
f't.110 Pt.110
Ion~
Pt.110
ToCal
Fugitive I Exhe.ust
PM2.5 P!,,12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-co2 I tlPif:t co2I Total co2
MT,W,,.

CH4 N20 C02e
Q.3700e-, 0.094!1 , 0.123Q , 1.9000e-, , 4.8300e-, 4.8300e--, , 4.4400e-, 4.4400e-: 0.0000 , 17.0234 , 17.0234 , 5.5100e-, 0.0000 , 17.1611 003 004 003 003 003 003 003
------,------~------~------~-----~------~------~------,------~------~------~------~-----~------~---------~ 0.0317 • • • • • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000

0.0411 0.0946 0.1239 I 1.9000.,.
004

4.8300e-4.8300.,_
003 003

4..4400e-, 4.M0Oe-
003 003

0.0000 11.0234 1 11.0234 1 s.s100e-1 0.0000
003

17.1611
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-168

~l;l;;~Q(J.. Version· GalEEMod.2016 3.2 Page 19of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.5 Paving -2022
unmitigated construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
WO<ker
Tota.I
ROG NOx co 502 Fugiti..e Exhaust
PM10 f'a.110
·~
PM10
Total
Fugiti..e I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2-5
Pt.125
Total
Bio-C02 l~C02I TolalC02I CH4 N20 CO2•
MT/v,t.

0.QOOO I Q,QOOO I Q,OOOQ I 0.0000 I 0,00QO I Q,OQOO I Q,OOOQ I Q,OOOQ I Q,OQOO I Q,OQOO Q.QOOO I Q,QQOO I Q,OQOO I Q,OOOQ I Q,OOOQ I 0,0000 -o.ocoo -:--o~OOOl-~ -0.0000-: -0.0000 -~ -o~OOOO -:-O~o-: -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-()A)CXX)-~ -o~-:-0~0000-: -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-0:0000-~ -0.0000 -, 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
------•------~------~------~------1------~------L------•------J------~------~------L------•------J ______ , I 5.0000e-' 3.6000e-' 4,1100e-' 1.0000e-' 1.4000e-' 1.0000e-' 1.4100e-' 3.7000e-' I.OOOOe-' 3.8000e-0.0000 ' 1.1760 ' 1.1760 ' 3.0000e-' 0.0000 ' 1.1768 ~·~ ~ ~·~ ~·~·~·~ = ~ '

5.0000e· I 3.6000•-I 4.1100•-
1 1.0000•· I 1.4000e-
1 1.0000•· I 1.4100•· I 3.7000 ...
1 1.0000 ..
1 3.sooo ...
~ ~ = = ~ ~ = -~ -

0.0000 1.1760 1.11so I 3_0000 •• I 0.0000
005

1.1768
Mitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
Category lon5'\I'.

PMIO
ToloJ
Fugitive I E>heust
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-co2 I ~ co2I Totsi co2
MT/y,r,
CH4 N20 C02e
__ ~~R~d-_ -II ~~3~~-!-_o_o~_ j_ ~:~3-g-L'-~-~ _____ j_~a~~ j_4_a~-~ ______ !_ ~~ L~~ _ ~-o~-: _1:-~~-~-1:-~-~ ~-~-~~: _:~ _: 11.1e11 I Paving I 0.0317 : : ; ; ; OJX)OO : OJX)OO : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Toti.I 0.0411 0.0946 0.1239 1 1.9000.-
004

4.8300 .. -I 4,9300.,_
003 003

4.A400e-I 4A400e­
= 003
0,0000 11.0234 I 11.0234 I 5.5100e-I 0.0000
003

17.1611
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-169

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.5 Paving -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
category
Hauling
Vendor
WOl'k:er
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exheust

PMIO PMIO
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12,5
Total
Bio-CO2 I WiR-CO2 I Total CO2
·~ I MTJ\ol.

CH4 N20 C02e

0.0000 I 0,QOOO I Q,OOOQ I Q,0000 t Q.OOQQ I Q,0000 I 0,Q(X)O I Q,O(X)O I 0.0000 I 0.0000 : 0.0000 I Q.0000 I Q,OOQO I Q,QOCIO I Q,OOOQ I Q,OOOQ ------•------~------•------~------•------•------~------•------~------~------•------~------,------~------I ~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:=:=i~:=:~:~:=:= I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
______ 1 ______ J ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ ~ ______ J ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ , I 5 OOOOe-1 3 6()00e. 1 4 1100e-1 l OOOOe-1 -1 4000e· 1 1 OOOOe-1 1 41(X)e.. ' 3 7000e-1 1 OOOOe-' 3 8000e-• 0 0000 1 11760 1 1 1760 1 3 OO()()e. 1 0 0000 1 .004 1 ·004 1 '003 1 ·oos: '003 1 '005: '003 1 ·004: '005 1 '004 ; . 1• 1 • 1 ·005 1• 1

5.0000..-I 3.6000e-I 4.1100~
1 1.0000~
1 1.4000e-
1 1.0000•-i 1.4100•-i 3.7000•-i 1.0000~ I 3.8000~
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004

0.0000 1.1760 1.1160 I 3.oooo..-
005

0.0000
1,1768

1.1768

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
unmitigated construction on-Site
Category
ArcM. Coating
Off.Road
Total
ROG NOx co S02

2.0418 •
Fugitive I Exhaust
Plol10 PM10
lons!\ol.

PM10
Tolal
I Q_OOQ() I 0.QOOO I
Fugitiv& I Exhausl
PM2.5 PM2.5
I Q.OQOO I
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I~ co2I Total co2
MT~
CH4 N20

0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 •
C02e

0.0000
-1J~.-:--o~o12o-~-0.01s4 -J. 3-0000;..-~ -----~ -o.~ ~ -6~~-~ ------:-6_QOOOe: ~ -6.QOOae: -0~0000-~ -2.1100 -~ -2~ 1-103 ~ -1~4000@: ~ -0.0000 -: -----I ()()3 I 005 t 004 004 I 004 I 004 ()()4 I

2.1738

2.9436 0.0120 0.0154 I 3.oooo~
005

6.9000e-I 6.9000~
004 004

6.9000e-1 6.9000e-
004 004

0.0000 2.1703 2.1103 1 1A000e-1 0.0000
004

2.1738
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-170

~Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 7120/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.6 Architectural Coating • 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Woncer
Tota.I
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
fons/y,t,
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2..5 PM2.5
Pl,12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I blPi<;-0021 Total 0021 OH4 N20 C02e
MT¥.
=:=:=:=:=:~:=:=:=:=;=:=:=:=:-:=
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
------~-----J ______ i ______ ~ ______ , ______ i ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ ~ ______ i ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ ~--- Q,OOOO : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
______ I _______ I ______ _I, ______ I _______ I ______ .'. ______ I_ ______ I ______ _I ______ ~-_____ .1. ______ I_ ______ I ______ J ______ '-I

4.6100e-: 3.2900e-: 0.0381 : l.20C0e-: 0.0130 : 9.0000e--: 0.0131 : 3.4400e-: 9.0000e-: 3.5300e-: 0.0000 : 10.8980 : 10.8980 : 27000e-: 0.0000 : 10.9049 003 003 I 004 I 005 I 003 005 003 I I I 004

4.6100..· I 3.2900e-I 0.0381
003 003

1.2000e-I 0.0130 I 9.0000e-I 0.0131
004 005
3 .. 4400@-I 9.0000e-I 3.5300e-
003 005 003

0.0000 I 10.89so I 10.8980 I 2.1000..-I 0.0000
004

10.9049
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Arc:ho. Coamg
Off-Road
Tota.I
ROG NOx co 502

2.9418 '
Fugitive j Exh.ausf
PM10 Pl,\10
tons,\\<.

PM10
Tolsl
I Q.0000 I Q.OOQO I
Fugitive j Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl,12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I ~ C02I Tolal CO2
MTIJI'.

CH4 N20 C02e
' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

1.74~-:--o-0120-.J _ OOis◄-~ ;:oocx,;: ~ -----~-e.~ ~ -e~OOOo~--~ -----_I_ 6.cicooe: ~ -6.sXXl«ie: --0000() ~ -21100-L·21-703 ~ -1~~ ~ -00000 ·: I 0031 •• 005 00410041 0041 004 ... 004
10 2.1738

2.9436 0.0120 0.0154 1 3.oooo...
005
s.sooo.--j s.sooo ....
004 004

6.9000..· j 6.9000.-
004 004

0.0000 2.1703 2.1103 J 1.4000.-J 0.0000
004

2.1738
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-171

~f;f;llllQ!J.. Version: GalEEMo<l.2016.3.2 Page22 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fu!Jitive I Exhaust
PMI0 Pl.110
tons.I\?;
PM10
Total
Fugrtive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 [~CO2 [ Total CO2
MTi\i;,.

CH4 N20
Ha1.1ling =:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:=:~;=:=:=:=:~:

C02e

0.0000
Vendor
------~-----J ______ i ______ L ______ . ______ i ______ L ______ . ______ J ______ ~------~------L------·------J ______ , I =:~:~:~:~:=:~:~:=:~;=:=:=:=:~: 0.0000
------'------'------'------· ------·------'------· ------·------·------• ______ 1 ______ 1 ------'------·------:-----t

4.6100e-: 3.2900e-' 0.0381 ' 1.2000e-: 0.0130 ' 9.0000e-: 0.0131 ' 3.4400e-: Q,OOOOe-' 3.5300e-" 0.0000 ' 10.8980 ' 10.8980 ' 2.7000.-: 0.0000 W"'1<er 003 003 004 005 003 005 003 004
Tobi 4.s100e-1 3.2900e-I 0.0381
003 003

4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

1.2000•-1 0.0130 I 9.0000@-I 0.0131
004 005

3.4400e-1 9.0000e-I 3.5300e-
003 005 003

0.0000 1 o.8980 I 1 o.8980 I 2. 1000e-I 0.0000
004

10.9049

10.9049
~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-172

~Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM ROG NOx
Category
9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual co S02 Fugitive Exlulusl
pt,t10 Pt.110
tonslv,.

Pl.110
Tolal
Fugitive I Exlulusl
PM2.5 pt,12.5
PM2.~
Total
Bio-CO2 I ~co2I To1a1co2I CH4
MTl!ll,
N20 002e
Mitigated I~ 0.1673 1 0.3000 1 4.3564 1 0.011:18 1 1.74TT 1 0.0113 , ·L75QO 1 0-4640 , 0.0104 1 0.4743 0.0000 1 1.518.4031 1.5·18.4031 0.0320 , 0.0000 , 1,510202 : : : : : : : : : I 8 I 8 I I I ]
--lhl;;.tigaied---o.1673 -r-0~3909-r 4.3564-r-o.o,es -r-1~i4n r 0.0113-1-1.7590 -r-0~4640 T-0~0104-1-04743---0:0000-r 1.51-f4oor i,51:493r o:Om-1-0.0000 11,51~.292

4.2 Trip Summary Information
I Average Daily Trip Rate I Unmitigated I Mitiga1e<l
land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
............ c.~~~-,iioiri~;e"Jiid1~9"'"'"'". 19.00 19.00 19.00 13e,aso 13e,a50 •• ■ ••• ■ •••••••••••••• ■ •• ■ ••••••••••••••••• -:-- - - --- -----J _ - ----- - - -J - --- - - - - - - - --- --- - - --- --- - - - - --- - - - - --- --- - - --- ---- --- Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00
Parking lot • : 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00
u;r~irig;;.;;d ·.;.,;;;h;~;~~N; 'Ji~;i ...... :· ----5s:i.s5 ---~---553.95 --~ ---553.95 ----------4~55o~s23 -------4,550.s23 Total f 572.95 I 572.95 I 572.95 4,687,674 4,687,674

4.3 Trip Type Information
I Miles I Trip% I Trip Purpose%
Land Use H-W or C-W H-5 or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverte<l Pass-by ..........................

General Office Building 24.20 24.20 24.20 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 , •••••• ■ •• ■ •••• ■ ••••••••••• ------ - - --1---- - - ---,----- --- ----- --- - -~ --- - - - -., - - ---- ----=---------- Other Asphatt Surfaces : 16.60 , 8.40 , 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 , .......................... ,:-----------.---------.-----------:--- -----:---------:----------:---------- Parking Lot : 16.60 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0
"C,~;;f~~~~i;ci w~:e·h;u·;e·.;jo' r---24.20 ---r--ii.io--r --24.20 --T--59:iJo --r--0~00 --1---41.00 ---=-----92----

4.4 Fleet Mix
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-173

~l;ffllloo_ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH General Office Building 0.603018: 0.047037: 0.220506: 0.129439: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.O00000: 0.00000 ---------------------------~------J _______ L ______ J _______ L ______ J _______ L ______ J _______ t ______ J _______ t _______ , ___ _ Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.552111: 0.043066: 0.201891: 0.118512: 0.015605: 0.005863: 0.021387: 0.031253: 0.002087: 0.001818: 0.004803: 0.000708: 0.00089 ■ I I I I I I I I I I '.----
Parking Loi 0.552111: 0.043066: 0.201891: 0.118512: 0.015605: 0.005863: 0.021387: 0.031253: 0.002087: 0.001818: 0.004803: 0.000708: 0.00089 ■ I I I I I I I I I I
-u.;-relrigerated Wa;e-ho~se~No--0~603018: -004703~ -022ososr -o 1294397-o~oooooor -000-00007-o~oooooor -000-00007-o~oooooor -000-00007-o:Oooooor -0.000000 0.00000 Rail

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx co S02
Category
Fugitiv<! I Exhaust
PMIO Pl.110
·~
PMtO
Total
FugitiVe I Exhaust
PM2-5 PM2-5
Pl,12,5
Total
Bio-CO21~c02J Tot.a1C02 CH4 N20 C02e
MTJ\/1.
__ ~~--~? __ -If-_____ j _______ j ______ -i-_____ -i-______ j_ ~-~--i-_ ::~ _ :_ ____ --i-~-~-J-~-~-L -o~~-o-.l :-~~~-g~ i-~-:'~~~-i-~-o~a_ j -4-~~ i 1.01:s1, EJectriCrty 1 1 1 1 1 0.000Q 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 Q.OOOQ • Q.OOOQ 1 1,015.943 1 1.Q16.Q43 1 0.0223 1 4.600Qe-1 1.018.871 Urvnitigat@d I I I I I I I I I : 16161 1QOJ,14
~
Mitigated
~
Unmit;gsled

6.7ooc,;.-:--0~0614-~ -0.0516-~ -a~1oci);_-~ ------:-4.6100; f -4~67oo;_-~ ------:-4.6100,; ~ -4.61~ i-0~0000-f-661t698-~ -e6.siQ8 -:-1-.2socie: ~ -1~~:: I e1.2en 003t I 1()041 l{X)310QJI IOQ31()()J: I I 1{X)JIQ03,

6.7600e-
003

0.0614 0.0516 3.7000.-
004

4.6700e-
003

4.8700.-
003
------,-4~¥-= 1-46~¥-= y-0~0000-1-66~98-r-66.86~ T 1-~cf 1-1~~ e1.2en ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-174

wJll;ft,100,. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Gars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use -~
Unmitigated
~II ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PMI0
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
P:i.t2.5 1'1,12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-c02 I ~co21 To1a1co2 CH4 N20 002•
sUse Pl.110 1'1,110
Land Use ~ ton'°'ll1, mlWT,,
Genera) Office I 6Q4QO 3-7000e-; 3.4000e-; 2.8600e--; 2.00CJOe.. ; ; 2.6~ ; 2.6000e-; ; 2..6000e-; 2JM)00e-0.0000 ; 3.7035 ; 3.7035 ; 7.0000e-; 7.0000e-; 3.7255 B<0lding
Other Asphalt 0
004 005 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 , 005

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
------T------r------,------,------r------,------,------r------,-------------,------,------r------,---------- 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , , 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 Surfeces
Par1<ing Lot 0 ------~------~------,------~------~------,------~------~------,-------~------,------~------~------,------I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 OJX)I)() , OJ)()()() 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 0.0000 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 - --·-- -._ --... ---·---... --... - --·------.... - - -------~ ---·---~ - -- Unrefrigeraied 1 1. 18369e 6.J800e-I 0.0580 0.0487 J,5000e-I 4,4100e-I 4,4100e-I 4.4100e-I 4_4100e-0.0000 eJ.1e64 , eJ.1664 1.2100e-, 1.1e00e--, 63.5417 Warehouse-No 1 +ooe 003 ' 004 ' 003 ' 003 ' 003 ' 003 ' 003 ' 003 ' fuiil
Total 6.7500..-0.0614 0.0516 3.7000~ 4.6700~-4-6700~ 4a6700e• 4.6700..-0.0000 6608698 6608698 1.2800.-1.2300.-67.2672 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-175

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3·09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distnbution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use -~
Mitigated
Land Use
~
5 Use
~
General Office ' ell400
Buildir,g
other AsphaH I O
S..taces
-Pamnglol 0
-. ---- Unrefrigeraied 1 1.18369e
Warehouse-No +ooe
Rail
Total
ROG I NOx I co
]
502 Fugitive Exhau•t PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5
PMI0 Pt.110 T-PM2.5 Pl,12.5 Total 8'o--C021 ~C021 T-C021 ~ N20 l C02e
Ions/\,<. MT~

3.7000e-; 3.4000e-; 2.8600e-; 2.000Qe.. ; ; 2.600Qe.. ; 2.6000e-; ; 2.60Q0e.. ; 2-6000e-0.0000 ; 3.7035 ; 3.7035 ; 7.00CJOe. ; 7.0000e-1 3.7255 004
1 003
1 003
1 005
1 1
004
1 004
1 1
004
1 004 I I
1 005
1 005
------T------~------1------T·-----r------,------~------r------1-------------,------T·-----r-----~---------~ 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 , , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 , O.OCX>O , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 O.OOCIO 1 0.0000 -0:0000 · ~ -0.0000 -~ -o~OOOO -:-o~-~ ------~ -0.0000 -:--0~0000-~ ------~ -0.0000 -:--0.0000 -:--0.0000 -:--0~0000-~ -Q_OOO(j -~ -0.0000 -:--0~0000-I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I
I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I
------~------L------1------~------L------1------~------L------L------~------1------~------L------1---------- 6.380Qe.. I 0,0580 I 0,0487 I 3,500Qe-I I 4,4100e-I 4.4100e-I I 4,41QOe.. I 4.4100e• ■ Q,OQOO I 63.1664 I 63;1664 I 1.21QOe.. I 1, 16QOe-I 63,541] 003 I 004 : 003 : 00J I 003 : 00J : (X)J : 003 :

6.7li00e-0.0614 0.0516 3.7000<>-
003 004

4.6700e--4.6700e-
003 003

4.6700e-4.6700.-
003 003 0.0000 I 66Jl61l8 I 66.869811-~~-11.2~".:'•-1 67.2672 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-176

~Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity
Unmitigated
Land Use
General Office
Building
Eledricify
Use
~
' 1ll0400
Other Asphalt , 0
Surfaces
>-----~------PamngLot ' 124712
Unrefrigerated : 1.37612e
Warehouse-No 1 -+-006
Rail
Total
Total C021
:J
N20
l::

MTf\ol.
114.4884 I 2.5000e-I 5.200Qe-I 114.7()55
003 004
------~------~------I 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 ------•------L-----J I 74.9901 ' 1.6400e-' 3.4000e-' 75.1322 :003:004:
-827.4651 :-o.o-1s1-: 3.7~ -: 820.03311
I I 003 I
1,016.943 0.0222 4.6100e-1,018.871
6 003 4
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-177

~ Version: GalEEMOCl.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use -Electricity
Mitigated
El~ II Total CO2] CH4 I N20 I C02e
Land Use
General Office
Builds,g
~
190400
- - - - -
other Asphstt I O
Scwfsces
>-----~------
Part<in~ Lot ' 124712
Unrefrigerated : 1.37612e
Warehouse-No I +()06
Rail
Toi.al

6.0 Area Detail
MT~
114.<la84, 2.5000e-, 5.2000e-, 114.7055
100310041
------+------~-----I
OJ)OOO : 0.0000 : 0.()(X)() : 0.0000
' ' ' ______ J ______ L------~------il

74.0001 : l.~~ : 3.~e-: 75.1322
_______ I _______ I _______ 1-----1
827.4651 : 0.0181 : 3.7500e-: 8~.0337
003
1,016.943 0.0222 4.6100e-1,018.871
6 003 4

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-178

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page29 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM Cai.Qo,y
Mitigsted
Unmitigated
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin. Annual ROG NOx co 502

2.5423 ; 7.0000@• ; 8.020Qe-; 0.0000 I
005 003

2.5423 7.0000e-I s.0200 ...
005 003

0.0000
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.410 PM10
tonsil/)<.

PMI0
Total
I 3.000Qe-; 3.0000@-I
005 005

3.0000...
005

3.0000...
005
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl,12.5 Pl,12.5
PM2.5
Too,I
s;o.c021~co21 r-co2 Cfi4 N20 C02e

3.0000<>-; 3.0000e-0.0000
005 005

3.0000...
005

3.0000e-: 0.0000
005
MT~

0.0156 , 0.0156 , 4.0000e-; 0.0000 , 0.0166
005

0.0156 0.0156 I ◄.0000.-
005

0.0000 0.0166

6.2 Area by~
Unmitigated
SIIOC~
Architectural
Costing
Consumer
Produc!s
Landscaping
Tot.al
ROG NOx co S02 Fugiljw I Exluwst
PM10 PM10
tonYV,t.

PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bic,. CO2 I~ CO2 I Tot.. CO2
MTI\\J.

Cfi4 N20 C02e

0.2Q42 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I , O.OCX>O 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ; 0.0000 , 0.0000 ; 0.0000 , O.OCOO -i.i474 -~ ------:------~ ------~ ------:--o~oo;; ~ -0.0000 -; - -----~ -0~0000-~ --o~ocoo--:--0~0000-,-()_O()(X)-~ -0.0000 -~ -0~0000-~-O.~ -I , , , , , , , , , : I , , , ,
I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I

0.0000
-7~5~-~ 1m--:-s02roe".. ~ -00000 -~ ------:-ioooci.: ~ -3~0000.:: ------~ ;oo"oo;. ~ -:iocioo.: -= -o~ooiio-1-0015ii -: -001s«i -~ :;0000.;:. ~-00000 -·, ----1 0.0166 004
1 005
1 003
1 1 1
005
1 005
1 1
005
1 005 I
1 1
005
1 '

2.5423 1.0000.-1 s.02000-I 0.0000
005 003

3.0000•-1 3.0000e-
005 005
l.OOOOe-1 3.0000e-
005 005

0.0000 0.0156 0.0156 I 4.=•-I 0.0000 0.0166
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-179

~ Version: CalEEMod 2016 3_2 Page 30of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM

6.2 Area by~
ROG NOx
~
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual co 502 Fugitive I Exha\lst
Pl,l10 PM10
I~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2_5 PM2-5
PM2_5
Total
Bie>-C02 l~0021 Tolal002
MTl\'k
c~ N20
Architectural
Coating =: :=:=: :=:~;~•=:=:~:=:

C02e

0.0000
I I I I I I I I I • I I I t
______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ 1 ______ L _____ J _______ ~------------L------L _____ J _________ _ ~: :=:=: :=:=;~•=:=:=:=: Consumer 0.0000
-Landscsping
I I I I I t I I I • I I I I I
-1 :-s~-:-7.~ -:-8.0200; -:-0.0000 -:-------:-3.0QOOe: -:-i~-·:· ------: 3.0000;. -: -ioo:ioe: -~ 0~0000-1-0.0156-·:· -O.fr156 -:-4.oi,o;. -:-0.0000--:-----1 o.O1ee ~ ~@ ~ ~ ~ ~= I ~
To1al 2.5423 1.0000e-I a.0200 ... I 0.0000
005 003

7.0 Water Detail
7_1 Mitigation Measures Water

3.0000e-1 3.0000e-
005 005

3.0000e-1 3.0000e-
005 005

0.0000 0.0156 0.0156 1 4.0000e-1 0.0000
005

0.0166
~~ ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-180

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Catego,y
Mitigated
Unmitigated
Total CO2 Crt4 N20 C02e
t.!Tfrl;
1,142.049, 4.5337 , 0.1115 , 1,288.604
5 I I 4
1,142.049 I 4.5337
5 -----+-----I I 0.1115 11,288.604
4 7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Land Use
General Office
Scalding
other Asphalt
Surf.aces
Parking Lot
Unre:frigera~
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total
1=~~11 Tm~C01 CH4 I N20 I 002e
M»l
• 3.55467 /
' 2.17867
----- ' 0/0
-- ---
0/0
' , 134.842/
0 MTI\IJ,
I I 003 I
I
43_5140 , 0.116a , 2.g:ioo.,. , 47.3051
------~------: _____ ~: I

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000
1--0~0000-:-0.0000 -:-0.0000 -: 0.0000
' '

1.008.535: 4.416Q : 0.1085 : 1.241.20Q
5 +---1----+-3

1.,~049 I 4.5337 I 0.1115
1 t.2s:_s04
~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-181

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
11=~~11 TolaJCOJ CH4 II C02e
Land Use Mlllll MT~
General Office : 3.55467 I 43.5140 0.1168 2.gJQ()e-: 47.3051 Building , 2. 17867 003
'
other Asphalt :--0 / () --: ---- - --:---- - --: I
Q_()(J(X) I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000
Surfaces
----
Psrnng Lot 010
I
--0~0000-~ -0.0000 -; -0.0000 0.0000
' '
Unrefrigera~ed
Warehouse-No
Rail
, ,-34 s.i2, 11-1~ogs.535 ~ -44t6Q -: -o 1osii -, 1.241.:m : 0 5 : : : 3
Total 1. ,~.G4S I 4.5337 I o., 115
1 1.28:.604

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-182

~Version: GalEEMod.2016 32 Page33 of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Category/Year
Total CO2 I CH4
I
N20
I
002e
MT/y);
l.1itigsted 115.0370 : 6.7985 : 0.0000 : 284.9993
' ' ' -----------115.00101 -s: 7985 -1-0:0000-I 284.llQll3 Unnitige.ted

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
~.~ Tolal CO2 I CH4 I N20 I C02e
land Use Ions MT/¥1.

Gene~ ~ce 1 18.6 3.7756 : 0..2231 1 0.0000 : g.3540
Building I I I I
1------::------------:------: ------::----t
Other Asphalt I Q 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000
Sutf,9ces 1 , 1 1
1------:1 I I 1:----t
Perking Lot 1 0 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000

I I I I
1-Un--...,-lrig-. -.ra-t-ed-~, -548.11--1-11.2614 ~ -6.5is◄-~ -0.0000-~, -27-5-.64-54--4 Wsreho~No : • 1 1
Rail I I I I
Total 115.0370 I 6.7585 I 0.0000 1284.9993
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-183

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page34of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
~~ 11 T~oi CO2 I CH4 I N20 I C02e
Land Use Ions
General Office , 18.6
Building
Olher Asphalt 0
SUrfsoes
Psr1cingLot 0
>-----~-----
Unrefrigerated ' 548. t 1
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total
MT/\!<.

3.nse ; 02231 ; 0.0000 , 9.3540
--0~0000-, -00000 -T -00000 0.0000
I
--0~0000-~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 0.0000 I
' ' ' ' 1--,::,'-::.:c_,-•-::.:: '----·-· • 111.2614 : 6.5754 ' 0.0000 : 275.6454 '
115.0370 I 6.7985 I 0.0000
1 284.9993
Equipment Type Number

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number
Boilers
Hours/Day
Hours/Day
Equipment Type Number Heal Input/Day
User Defined Equipment
DaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
HoursNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-184

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35of 35 Date: 7/20/2021 3:09 PM ~ 9309 Sycamore Hills Distnbution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-185

wJll;fMOO. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3.10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses ] Size
General Office Building 20.00
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 1 583.10
Other Asphalt Surfaces
--------
Parking Lot

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urtlanizalion Urban
Climate Zone 10
Utility Company Riverside Public UtiMies
CO2 Intensity 1325.65
(U!/MW!ul

16.00 8.18
Wind Speed (mis)
CH4 Intensity
(U!/MWM

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
South Coast Air Basin, summer
1 Metric I Loi Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population 1000"'111 0.46 20,000 00
__________ ~~o_o~~ __________ I ____ ~ ~-~~ ____ i ____ ~~~-~ o_o~o~ _____ ! o Acre 16.00 696,960.00
-----------Acre -----------r----8.18 ----i----356,320.80-----1

2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2022

0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006
(U!/MWM
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-186

~ version: GalEEMOCl.2016.3.2 Page2 of28 Date 7120/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, summer Project Characteristics -See SWAPE comment regarding CO2, CH4, and N2O intensity factors.

Construction Phase -Total construction length consistent with information provided in the DEIR, but phase lengths are ~altered_ Vehicle Trips -Consistent with the DEIR's moelel.

Land use -consistent with the DEIR's model.

Grading -
Trips and VMT -See SWAPE comment regarding vendor and worker trip numbers.

Architectural Coating -See SWAPE comment regarding architectural coating emission factors.

Fleet Mix -See SWAPE comment regarding operational vehicle fleet mix. Only passenger cars. Trucks reduced to o; passenger car percentages proportionally altered based on~ defaults_ See construction calculations.

Energy Use -
Water And. Wastewater -See SWAPE comment regarding indoor water use rate.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding the PM 10 and PM2_5 % reductions_ Mobile Land Use Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name
I
Column Name
I
Defaun Value
I
New Value
~ ----17.00 ~ 55.00
- --- --~~b-~~ -- - ---t----- - -- --~ -- -- - -- - -- -- -- -- -- - -740~00-- - - - - - - - --: 227.00 I ~ " ~ 75.00 . 46.00
~ ::-~ 55.00 : 17.00
-------~ ------= ----------~ ---------------------30:00 -----------,....------------.... 18.00 . . ~ =---------~--------= 11127/2024 6/29/2022
--------------------------,-------------------------,----------------------------------------1 ~ : ~ : 6/26/2024 5/12/2022
1- - - - - --------- - - - - - - - - - ---_ ----- --- - - - - - - ------ - - - --_-- - --------- --- --- --- -----~· ------------ ~ ~~ 8125/2021 6/29/2021
1:::::::==:::::::~::::::::=:::::::1:::::::::::~~!~~~::::::::::~ -----__ -_-_-_-_-_---- 616/2022
4/26/2021
~ : t'Pn~ : 9/12/2024 617/2022
. . ~·------------- ~ :--------~ -------=----------8126/2021----------: 6/30/2021 -------------~------------~------------i I ~ eii..~s,ooQ;"e 5/13/2021 4127/2021 ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-187

~l;f;MOO.. Version: GalEEMod.2016_3 2 Page 3of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer S/1312022
-------~------l--------~--------J----------~~~~~~~---------11------ ~ : HHD : 0.03 0.00 --------------------------~-------------------------~--------------------------~------ ~ : HHD 0.03 -

0.00 ~ ; LDA 1 0.55
-

0.60 I
-- ----- - - - - --- --- --- ------: ----- --- ----- --- - - ----- --:----- --- - - ----- --- ----- --- ~ : LDA : 0_55
. .

0.60 ~ ,. -----------i:-oi1 -----------.. o.o4 0.05 . . --------------------------r-------------------------,--------------------------~------- ~ LDT1 0.04 0.05
~ LDT2 : 0.20 :
-

0.22 ---------~ --------------------LDT2 ----------:------------0.20 -----------: -

0.22 ~ LHD1 -: 0.02 -

0.00 ~ LHD1 • 0.02 0.00
~ LHD2 -. S.8630e--003
-

0.00 I
--- -- - - ----- ----- ---- -----r -------- ----- ---- --------,----- ---- --------- ----- --- ~ : LHD2 : S.8630e-003
I ~ : MCV : 4.8030e--003
---------------------------------------------------~--------------------------~------

0.00 -

0.00 ~ MCV , 4.8030e-003
~ MDV 1 0.12 :
~ MDV 1 0.12 ::-------

0.00 0.13

0.13 --------------------------: -------------------------:--------------------------,------- ~ MH 8.9600e-004 0.00
. .
~ : ------------MH -----------: s.9sooe..oo4 0.00 . . --------------------------r-------------------------,--------------------------~------ ~ MHD : 0.02 0.00 . . -------------------------->-------------------------<--------------------------------- ~ MHO 0.02 0.00 1--------------------------. -------------------------~------------------------------- ~ OBUS 2.0870e-003 0.00
1 ----------------------------------------------------:-------------------------- ~ OBUS 2.0870e-003 0.00
~ SBUS • 7.0S00e--004 0.00
1 ---------------------------------------------------~--------------------------' ~ SBUS : 7.0S00e-004 : 0.00
---------------------------------------------------,--------------------------,------- ~ UBUS 1.8180e--003 0.00
---------~ -------------------UBUS ----------;---------1 8180e-003 ---------[ ~,
0:00
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-188

wJll;f;MOO.. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM ~, 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer _________ -~ ________ _l _________ ~-________ 1 ___________ 1~~3~ ___________ 1 15.54 I ~ ; CC_TL ; 8.40 24.20
~ f CC_ TL 1 8.40
--------------------------~ -------___ ::..-..~-__________ -~-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24.20

24.20 ~ CNW_TL 6.90 . .
~ : CNW_TL : 6.90 24.20 . . --------------------------,-------------------------~--------------------------~------------~ ~ : CW_TL : 16.60 24.20 -------------------------->-------------------------~--------------------------:-------------~ ~ : CW_TL : 16.60 24.20
---------~ -------------------sT jR ----------------------i.46 -----------, o.95 I ~ ST_TR 1.68
1 0.95
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ SU_TR 1.05 0.95
---------------------------------------0.95 ~ =----------SU_TR 1.68 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------~------------~ ~ WO_TR 11.03 0.95
---------~ ------------------wo~rR----------------------1.si-----------[ 0.95

2.0 Emissions Summary
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-189

~ version: GalEEMoo.2016.3.2 Pages of28 Date: 7120/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
Yur
2021
2022
Maximum
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitiwe I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pl.110
!&>(day
Pt.110
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5
Pt.12.5
Tolaj
Bio-CO2 I 111BiR-C02I Total CO2
!p/day
CH4 N20 C02e

5.5678 : 46.4544 : 48.0l45 : o.1ns : 1a.2e15 : 2.t>4&J : 20.3134 : o.os40 : 1.8823 : 1·1.8663 : 0.0000 1 11.s:i52.3o: 11.5;;_30: 1.Q488 ; 0.0000 : 11.~◄.31 ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ ■ ______ -1-_____ I ______ , ______ I ______ I 345.8476 : 41.0782 : 46.4269 : 0.1692 : 9-4Q·13 : 0.9100 : 10.4022 : 2.5566 : 0.8560 : 3.4131 : 0.0000 I 17,2J3J~7: 17.233.07: 1.2373 1 0.0000 : 17.2e4.QO
346.8476 I 46.4544 I 48.9345 0.1726 18.2675 2.0460 I 20.3134 I 9.9840 1.8823 11.8663 -30 I 30 I 41

0.0000 I 11,512.39111,572.39 I 1.948s
35 35

0.0000 I 11,604.31
29 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx co
Yesr
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pl.110
l&>(dey
PM10
Total
Fugitive I E,chausi
Pt.12.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Tolaj
Bio-c02 I t:JeiPc c02I To1a1 co2
IP/day
CH4 N20 C02e
2021 II 5.5678 : 45.4544 : 48.03.45 : 0.112s : 1a.2e15 : 2_0450 : 20.3134 : o.0840 : 1.8823 : 11.8863 : 0.0000 I 17.572_3g: 11.572_;3g: 1.Q488 : 0.0000 : 17.504.31 I I I I I I I I : 1351351 I 129
---·-m2· ---1r °346~s476 :· -41.9i8i -:-40~4269 ·:-0.1692 -:· -Q.4g1l -:--o~g;og-·:-io~4022-:· -2.5566 -:--0~8566-·:--3~4131--;--o~OOOO-i-17_2i3~g7:· 11~i3i~i:--1~2373-·:-()_O(X)O -·: 11_2e4_gol I 30 1 30 1 1 1 41
Maximum 346.8476 I 46.4544 I 48.9345 0.1726 18.2675 2.0460 I 20.3134 I 9.9840 ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive ExhilUst PM10 Fugitive
PM10 PM10 Tolal PM2.5
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction

1.8823 11.8663
Exhaust PM2.5
PM2.5 TOl31

0.00 0.00

0.0000 I 17,572.39117,572.39 I 1.9488
35 35
Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0000 I 11,so,.31
29 N20 CO2e

0.00 0.00
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-190

~J;&MQ(j_ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
catego,y
Area
Energy
Mobile
Tota.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fug~ive I Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
l):,'day
PM10
Total
Fug~ive I Exhous1
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I ~c02J Total CO2
l>(day
CH4 N20 002e
13J)324 : 5.0000e-: 0.0641 : 0.0000 : : 2.3000e-: 2.3000e-: : 2.3000e-: 2.3000e-: I 0.1373 : 0.1373 : 3.6000e-: : 0.1463 1004, I I ,004,0041 10041004: I I ,004, '
______ I_ ______ 1 _______ 1 ______ I _______ I _______ I ______ ) _______ I _______ I _______ .__ ____________ .1. ______ I _______ 1 _____ --'.~

0.0370 : 0.3366 ; 0 .. 2827 : 2.0200e-: ; 0.0256 : 0.0256 ; ; 0.0256 ; 0.0256 : I 403.8978 : 403.8978 ; 7.7400e-: 7.4000e-; 406.2080 ~ : I ~ ~
-1.002G -~ -~9055 -:-26. ,-424 ~ -0.0~9 -~ -Q.i83B -:--o~06;9-~ -9.8457 -~ -2.5~ -~ ·o:o57o-~ --£iei,e,--r-- -- -, g:-e7,~ ,-« ~ Q,61·1~144 ~ ·0:2001· ~ - - - ---: Q,676.2731 I 7 1 7 1 , 1 O

14.9723 2.2426 26.4893 0.0990 9.7838 0.0877 9.8715 2.5936 0.0828 2.6764 10,075.17110,075.17 I 0.2132 I 7 AOOOe-110,082.71 98 98 003 73
Mitigated Operational
Catego<y
Area
Energy
Mobile
Tota.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugrtrve I Exhaust
PJ.110 PMIO
l):,'day
PM10
Total
Fugitive Exhaus1
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pr.12.5
Toto!
Bio-CO2 J tilPR 002 I Total CO2
l>(day
CH4 N20 002e

13.9324 : 5.me--: o.0641 : o.0000 I : 2.3000e-: 2.3000e-: I 23000@-: 2.3000e-I 0.1373 I 0.1373 ' 3.0000e-: : 0.1463 10041 I I 100410041 10041004■ I 10041 I
------~------:------~------~------~-----~------¼------~-----~-------~-----J------¼------~-----~------~ I 0.0370 , 0.3366 , 0.2827 , 2.0200e-, , 0.0256 , 0.0256 , , 0.0256 , 0.0256 , I 403.8978 , 403.8978 , 7.7400e-, 7.4000e-, 406.2980 I I 1()031 I I I I I : I 10031()031
------~------:------~------~------:------~------~------~-----~-------~-----J·-----!------~-----~------T'---~

1.QOig , 1.0055 , 26.1424 , 0.0969 , 9.7838 , 0.0619 , 9.8457 , 2.5936 , 0.0570 , 2.6506 • 19,67;.l44: 9,67i.144: 0.2051 , 9,67~273 I o o

14.9723 22426 26A893 0.0990 9.7838 0.0877 9.8715 2.5936 0.0828 2.6764 10,075.17, 10,075.17 I 0.2132 , 7.4000e-, 10,082.71 98 98 003 73
ii
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-191

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, summer ROG
Percent 0.00
Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
NOx

0.00 co 502 Fugitive Exhaust P1110
PM10 PM10 Total

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Phase Type Start Date
Stte Preparation : 4/1/2021
Fugitive Exhaust f'M2_5 Bio-CO2
Pll2.5

0.00 End Date
: 4126/2021
Pll2.5 Total

0.00 0.00 0.00
Num Days I Num Days
Week
5: 1s:

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH•

0.00 0.00 0.00
Phase Description
Stte Preparation
2 Grading
-----------
13 Building Construction
~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~?~~~~~~~ ~[6~9~0~~ ~~~~I~~~~~~~[~~~~~ ~~i I Building Construction : 6/30/2021 : 5112/2022 ' 5: 221:
1---------------------------

I I I I
4 Paving Paving : 5/13/2022 : 616/2022 ' 5: 17:
-------------
' 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): O
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 115
Acres of Paving: 24.18
' -------1-----------r--
617/2022 6/29/2022 5 17
N20

0.00 Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: 904,650; Non-Residential Outdoor: 301,550; Striped Parking Area:
63,197 (Architectural coating -~
OftRoad, Equipment
CO2e

0.00 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-192

wJJl;f;MOO-Version GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase Name I ~Equipment Type ] Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor ;:;:_ ~:;;:;;:~:;:::::::::::::: E;;;;:;~~~~;~k~~~s:::::: i::::: : : : : : : : : : ;:: : : : : : : : _:~~:i::::::::: ~;:a: 0.3 Grading :excavators : 2: s.oo: 1ss: 0.3
________________________ ; _______________________ j ______________ ~ ___________ J ___________ J Grading :Graders : 1: 8.00: 187: 0.41
------------------------·-----------------------·--------------~-----------·-----------·~------ Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers : 1: 8.00: 247: 0.4C
---~--------------------~-----------------------;---------------:-----------;-----------~·--------! Grading :Scrapers 2, 8.00, 367, 0.41

0.40 ------------------------.-----------------------~--------------,-----------~----------- Grading : Tractors/loaders/Backhoes 2: 8.00: 97: 0.3i a~ikfin9
~~;~~tio~ -----------:c;.;n~; ------------------: --------------,:---------1~00: ---------2:i1 • rn • I I I
------------------------,-----------------------~---------------•-----------~-----------~--------- Building Construction : Forklifts ' 3: 8.00: ss: 0.2( ------------------------~-----------------------~---------------•-----------~-----------~--------- Building Construction : Generator Sets : 1: 8.00: 84:
------------------------1-----------------------J _______________ , ___________ J ___________ ..,_ ______ -I Building Construction : Tractors/loadersfBackhoes : 3: 7.oo: 97:
------------------------'-----------------------'--------------~-----------·-----------~·--------! Building Construction :welders : 1: 8.00: 46:
• I I I

0.74 :1:: - - ---- ---- - - ---- - - -m: ,;.;,.;_;,; - - - - - ------1 - -- - - -- - -- - ---1:---------~:; ---------;:: :3 • I I I I

0.42 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors ] 1j 6.00] 78_,, ______ 0_.4_8 Trips and VMT
Phase Name ~Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip
Number Number
Worker Trip
Lenglh
Vendor Trip
Lenglh
Hauling Trip
Lenglh
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor I Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehide Class
I Site Preparation ,: 1soo: 20.00:~ :~
Grading ; s: 20.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: ~ : tuUJJ& : HHDT

I I I I I I I I
Building Construction
Paving
I Architectural Coating
9: 694.00: 271.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:~ :WUJJ& :HHDT ______________ ~:::: .: : : : : : : : ~:::::: ~s:o:oJ:::::: ~-~~!:::::: ~-~oJ:::::: ~~-~oJ:::::: ~:9~[:::: :2~~0~[ ~:::::: J ~::: '"! H_H_D_T---11 139.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.001~ tuUJJ& HHOT
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-193

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx I co
Catego,y
Fugitive Dust
I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust
PM10 P"110
l&l(dey
I 18.0663 I 0.0000
l't.110 Fugitive Exheust Pl.12.5 Bio-CO2 m1iR-C02 Tc,gi CO2 Tolal P"12.5 Pl,12.5 Total
ll>(dsy
' 18.0e83' Q_Q007 0.0000 Q.9307 Q,OOOQ I
CH4 I N2O I C02e

0.0000
------1------J------~------~-----J------~------~------•------~------~------~------~-----~------~-----·• I Off-Hoad Total

3.8882 ~ -40.4911
1 21.1543 • o.0380 i • 2.0445 • 2.04-45 • • 1.ssoo i 1.ssoo : : 3.~.656: J,esg.e56: 1.1ino • : J,71~.457

3.8882 40.4971 I 21.1M3 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 S.9307 1.880S 11.8116 3,685.65613,685.656 I 1.1s20 s s
3,715.457
3 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-194

~l;f,MQG. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Woncer
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugtive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
~dey
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2-5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 :

Bio-C02 l~0021 T-0021 Cf« N20 C02e
t>(dey

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
-0.0000 -;--o~ci:m-~ -0.0000-; -0.0000 -~ -o~(XX)() -:-0~0000-~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -;-0:0000-~ -()¥xi,--:------; -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-O:OOCO-~ ------• 0.0000 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : I
______ , ______ J ______ J ______ L ______ . ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ ~------l------L-----~------J ______ , I

0.0753 '. 0.0401 : 0.5758 ~ 2.0000e-: 0.2012 : 1.40001!-: 0.2027 : 0.0534 : 1.3700e-: 0.0547 : : 10Q.2417 : 1Q0.2417: 5.3700!-: : 10Q.3750 0031 10031 I 10031 • I I 10031 I

0.0753 0.0491 0.6758 I 2.0000e-1 0.2012 I 1.4900e-I 0.2027 003 003 0.0534 1 1.~~--0.0547 199.2417 1 199.2417 I s.3~0e-199.3759 Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive Dust
Off-Road
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
lt>(day
P~110
TObll
Fugitive I Exheusl
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-co2 I ~ c02 I Tolal co2 CH4 N20 C02e
~day
: 18.0663 : 0.0000 : 18.0663 : Q.9307 : 0.0000 : 9.9307 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000

I I I I I
------·------~------~------~-----~------~------~------·------~------------~------~-----~------~---------- 3.8882 I 40.4~71 I 21.1543 I 0.0380 I I 20445 I 20445 I I 1.880Q I t.880Q 0.000Q I 3,685.6561 3.685.6561 1.192() I I J,715.457

3.8882 40.4911 I 21.1543 0.0380 18.0G63 2-0445 20.1101 I 9.9ao1 1.8809 11.8116 I Q : Q I : 3

0.0000 I 3,685.65613,685.656 I 1.1920
9 9
3,715.457
3 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-195

~ version: caIEEM00.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 28 Date 7'20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx
Category
co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
Ua{doy
PM10
Total
FugitM, Exhaust
PM2.5 PM25
Pt.12.5
Total
Hauling 0.000Q I 0.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.OQOO I Q.0000 I Q.OOQO I Q.0000 I Q.OQOO I Q.0000 I 0.0000 6'0-co21~co2I To1a1co2I CH4 N20 co~
ll>(doy
I Q,QOOO I Q,0000 I Q,QQOO I ~ 0.0000
Vendor -O.OCOO -:--o~OOOO-:-o.ocoo-: -0.0000 -: -o~O:OO -:-0:0000-: -0.0000 -:-0:0000 -:--o~-:-0~0000-1------: -0.0000 -: -0.0000 -:-o:ooco-:------: 0.0000 I Wcri<er
Total
---- --:-- -----:------+ ------:-------:-------:. ------:-------:-------: -------:------·:· ------:-------:-- -----: ------:~ 0.0753 , 0.0491 , 0.6758 , 2.0000e-, 0.2012 , 1.4900e-, 0.2027 , 0.0534 , l.3700e-, 0.0547 : , 199.2417 , 199.2417 , 5.3700.-, , 199.3759

0.0753 O.O.t91
0031 10031 I 10031 : I I 1003

0.6758 I 2-~~ ...
1 0.2012 I 1-~~ ...
1 0.2027 0.0534 I 1.3100 ...
003

0.0547 199.2.417 1199.24171 5.3700..-
003
199.3759

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive Dusi
OIi-Road
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 P!.110
lj,(dey
PMIO
Tolol
Fugitrve Exhaust
PM2.5 P!.12.5
PM2.5
T-
: 8.6733 : 0.0000 : 8.6733 : 3.5065 : 0.0000 : 3.5g65
I I I I I I I I I ______ 1 ______ .J ______ J. ______ L _____ .J ______ .J. ______ L ______ 1 ______ .J. _____ _

4.1012 : 46.3008 : 30.8785 : 0.0620 : : 1.0853 : 1.0853 : : 1.8265 : 1.8265

4.1912 46.3998 I 30.s18s 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 ~.4230 Bio-c02 I ~ c02 I T o1a1 cc2 I CH4 N20 C02e
Ua{day

0.0000 0.0000
;------: e,001~043: 6,007.oo:--1~4ia-:--- ---: 6,055.6131 4 4 4
6,001.04316,001.043 I 1.9428
4 4
6,055.613
4 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-196

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.3 Grading -2021
unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Catego<y
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
U>{dsy
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2 5 PM2.5
f't.~.5
Total
8it>-C02 ll)llliq-CO2I TotalC02I CH4 N20 C02e
ll>ldoy

0.0000 : 0.0000 : O.OCOO : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 -----_:_ -- ---~ -- --- -; - -----~ -- -- -_:_ --- -_ l _ -----~ - -- --_:_ -- ---~ ------.!_ -----; ------~ -----_:_ -----~ ------~

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : O.O<XX> : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I
:------ -:-- --- --: ------:----- --:---- --+ ------:---- ---:--- --- -: -------=-------:· ------:-------:-------: ------:-1

0.0837 1 0.0546 1 0.750Q 1 2.2200e-1 0..2236 1 1.05CX)e.. 1 0.2252 1 o.o5gJ , 1.5200e-1 0.0603 : 1 221.37Q7 1 221.37Q7 1 5Jn(l()e. 1 1 22·L5288 003 003 003 003

0.0837 0.0546 0.7509 I 2.22001>-I 0.2236 11,65001>-I 02252 003 003 o.o5S3 I 1.5i:o~,,_ 0.0608 221.3797 I 221.3797 I 5.9~0e-221.5288 Mitigated Construction On-Site
Catego<y
Fugi1ive OU5t
Off-Road
Tota.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 f't.110
ll>(day
Pa.110
ToW
Fugitive I Exhoust
PM2.5 f't.~.5
PM2.5
Total
' 8.6733 0.0000 ' 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5-
I I I I I I I I I -- --- - - - - - - - -·--- - - --- --- - - - - - - - - ---- - - --- --- - - - - - - - - ---

4.11H2 : 46.3908 : 30.8785 : 0.0620 : : 1.0853 : ·1.0853 : : 1.8266 : 1.8265

4.1912 I 46.3998 I 30.8785 I 0.0,20 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 Bi<>-C02l~co21 ToWco2 CH4 N20 C02e
(p/day
I 0.0000 0.0000
' ' ' ' 0.0000 : 6,007.043: 6,007.043: 1_g428 : 8,055.613 4 4 4

0.0000 1,.001.00 [ ,,001.0431 1.9428
4 4
6,055.613
4 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-197

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13of28 Date 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer

3.3 Grading • 2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust Pt.12.5 Bio-CO2 llleR-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e PMI0 PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Catego,y u,/day l>[day
Hauling 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 • : 0.0000 1 0.0000 ; 0.0000 1 0.0000 ----------______ 1 ______ J ______ !------~------'------!------~------·------J ______ J ______ ! ______ ~ ______ • ______ J ______ •~--- -~:~:~:~:~:~:=:=:=:=; :=:=:~: ·~

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
---w.;,i:e~ ---01>831 ; 0.0546 -:-o.7509 '; 22200e-; Ct2236-:-1_0500-;_; 0.2252: 0.0593-:-1.521:Xk-; O.OOOs-:------": 221.37Qi: 221~1Q1 :-5.siJ~-; --:;-22-1-.5-2-8s--t 003 003 003 003
Total 0.0837 0.0546 0.7509 2.2200•· 0.2236 1.6500•· 0.2252 0.0593 1.5200e-0.0608 221.3797 221.3797 5.9700e-221.5288

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co
Catego<y
Off-Road 1.000Q I 17.4321 I 10.5752 I
Total 1.9009 ff4321 16.5752
003 003 003 003
SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio• CO2 ~ CO2 Tc<al CO2 CJ-14 I N20 I C02e PJ.110 PJ.110 Toial PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
ll>(day U,.,day

0.02fl~ ' ' 0.~88 ' Q.0586 I ' 0.0013 I 0.9013 : 2,553.36,3 : 2,553.36,3 : O.fl100 1 : 2,568.764
0 0 3

0.0269 0.9686 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3
~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-198

~ Version: GalEEMod2016.3.2 Page 14 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Calogo,y
Ha1.1ling
Vendor
Wocker
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive j Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
Ui(day
PM10
Total
Fugitive j Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 ll)liijct-C02[ TotalC02[ CH4
~day

0.0000 0.0000 T 0.00C)Q : 0.0000 : 0.0:00 T 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.OQOO I Q,OOOQ I I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I

0.]f324
1 25.Q52Q : e.3017 : 0.0688 : 1.7341 : 0.0530 : 1.7871 : Q_4Qg2 : 0.0507 : 0.54Q0 : : 7,337.155: 7.337.155: 0.4537 I : 6 6
i I I I I I I I I • I I I I
- -~ - - -,- - -r - -~ - --,- - -r --~ - - -,---T ---•------r --~ ---,- - -T 2.Q045 I 1.8944 I 26.0575 I 0.0771 I 7.7573 I 0.0574 I 7.8147 I 2.0573 I 0.Q52Q 2.1101 : I 7,681.874 I 7,681,874 I 0.2071 1 1

3.6669 21.8414 I 32.3593 0.1457 9.4814 0.1104 9.6017 2.5565 0.1036 2.6600 15,019.02115,019_02 I o.66os 96 96
Mitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fug;t;ve Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~CO2 TolalC02 CH4 I Pl.110 Pl.110 Tolal PM2.5 Pl.12.5 Total Catego,y lli(day U,.doy
Off.Road I.IKI09 17.4321 16.5752 0.026g 0.11586 0.11586 0.11013 0.11013 0.0<X)() I 2,553.363 I 2,553.363 I 0.6160 g g
Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 9 9
N20
N20
002•
7 0.0000
:~
I 7.348.408
4 , 7,687.050
2 I
15,035.54
86 002.
: 2.568.764
3 2,568.764
3 ~l
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-199

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Tobi
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 Pt,110
U>lday
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-C02 lllllii<t-002I TotalC021 CH4
l>(day
N20 C02e
O.OCOO ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; O.OCIOO , Q.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.0000 I Q_{)(XM) I Q.OQOO I Q.0000 I Q.0000 I 1 0.0000 ' -- --- -:- --- --~ -- -- --; -- -- --~ --- -- -:-- --- -~ --- ---~ - --- --:--- -- -~ - -- -- --=---- --~ -- --- -~ - -- ---:-- --- -~ ---- - -:-.. 0.7824 I 25.Q52Q I e.3017 I 0.()686 I 1.7341 I 0.0530 I 1.7871 I 0.4Qg2 I 0.05()7 I Q_5,4gQ : I 7,337.155 I 7,337.155 I 0.4537 I I 7.348.4Q8 , , , , , , , , : , e , e , , 4
~ ---.-- -~ --~ ---,---~ - -~ - --.-- -~ - --·------~ --~ ---.---~ -- 2.Q045 1 1.8Q44 1 28.0575 , o.on1 , 7.7573 1 0.0574 7.8147 1 2.0573 , 0.052Q 2.1101 : , 7,881.8741 7,e81.874, 0.2071 , 7.687.050

3.6669 27.8474 I 32_3593 0.1457 9.4914 0.1104 9.6017 2.5565 0.1036 2.6600 1 1 2
15,019_02115,019_021 o.66oa
96 96
15,035.54
86 3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugitive Extulual PMI0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 b11iR-CO2 T clal CO2 CH4 N20 I C02e PM10 Pt.110 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
CateQOry ll>(day U>iday
Off.Road 1.7CJe2 15.e1se 1e.3e34 0.02e~ Q_SOQO 0.8090 o.7e12 o.1e12 I 2,554.333 I 2,554.333 I o.e120 , 2,56Q.1:132 e 6 2
Tobi 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,5611.632 6 6 2
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-200

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 28 Date: 712012021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.4 Building Construct.ion -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
11>/day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2-5 PM2-5
Pt.12.5
Total
Hauling Q_OOOQ I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.OOOQ I 0.0000 I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I 0.0000 :
e;o.co21f>llli<l-002I ro1a1co21 OH4
ll>(day
I Q_OOQO I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I
N20 C02e
I Q.0000
Vendor
- - - ---.-- ----., ----- -'T ---".° --r--- ----,----- -'T --- - --,.. - - - - --,-- ----, --- - - --..-- - ---,. - --- - -,.. ---- --,--- ---, - -----~ o.7155 : 24.6511 1 5.0666 ~ o.0670 : 1.7341 ~ o.o4e·1 ~ 1.1so2 ~ o.4002 ~ 0.0441 ~ o.5433 : '. 1.27;_s33: 1.27;_s33: o.4381 : : 1.28;_186 Wc<lm 2.7248 • 1.7114 1 24.0Q69 • 0.0743 • 7.7573 1 0.0558 • 7.8131 1 2.0573 1 0.0514 Total 3.4A02 26.3626 I 30.0635 0.1422 9.4913 0.1019 9.5932 2.5565 0.0955 ' ~ 2.1086-:-------;-,_406~~ i.°4ci.sti;-o~s72 ,
-I 2 I 2 I

2.6519 14,679.631 14,679.63 I 0.6253
94 94
I 7,411.485
e
14,695.27
19 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-C02 lb!PiR-CO2 I Tolal CO2 I OH4 I N20 I C02e PM10 Pt.110 Total PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total I Category ll>(doy 3>/day
Off..Road 1.7062 1 15.6'156 1 16.3634 1 0.0269 1 • 0.80QO 1 0.8090 1 1 0.7612 1 0.7612 0,0000 1 2,554,333 1 2,554.3331 o.cn20 1 1 2.569.632 : : : : : : : : : : 0 : f5 : : : 2
Total 1.7062 115.6156 116.36341 0.0269 I I 0.8090 I 0.8090 I I 0.7612 I 0.7612 0.0000 I 2,55:.33312,55:.3331 0.6120 I 12,~.632 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-201

~l;l;;MQO.. version: GalEEMO<l.2016.3.2 Page 17 of28 Date 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
U>fday
PMIO
Total
Fugitive Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl,,12.5
Total
Hauling 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 Bio-C02 ltlllli<l-C021 Total CO2 I CH-4
l>(day
I 0,0000 ; 0,0000 ; Q,000() I
N20 C02e
, 0.0000
Vendor -o~i155 -:-24.65-,1 ~ -5.9666-: -0.0019 -~ -1~1341--:-i046_1 _: -1.7802 -~ -0.4992 -:--o:0441 -~ -0~5433-:------: 7,ii£s33 ~ 7,272.833-:-()~4381 -~ ------, 1,283.786 I I I I I I t I : 2 : 2 : I I J
Worker 2-;248 ~ 1.1114-;-24~ -:-0.0143 ~ 7.1573-;-o:0558 -:-7.s,31 -; 2.0513 ;-oA>514 -:-2.108e-:-------:-1.4013~,:x,-; ;,-4<:is(i ;-o~s72 -:- . . . . . . . -' 2 ' 2 ' Total 3.4402 26.3626 I 30.0635 0.1422

3.5 Paving -2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co 502
Category
Off-Road 1.1028 , 11,1249 , 14,5805 , 0.0228 ,

9.4913 0.1019
Fugitive Exhaust
PM10 Pl,,110
l&l(day

9.5932
Pt.110
Tola!
I 0.5679 I 0.5679 I

2.5565 O.O!lo5
Fugi1ive Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl,,12.5

2.6519
PM2.5
Total
, 0.5225 , 0.5225
14,679.63 , 14,679.63 I 0.6253
94 94
S.O-C02 I ~CO2[ TolalC02 CH4
U,:-day
, 2,207.660 , 2,207.660, 0.7140 ,
I 3 I 3 I
N20
• 7,411.485
' 6
14,695.27
19 C02e
, 2.225.510
' 4
---PaWig---1r-3.72ea-:------~------~ ------~ -----~-o.Dm-~ -0.0000-~------:--0~0000-~ -o~-~------~ ------~ -0.0000 ~------~ ------. 0.0000 I I • I I I I I I I I • I I l I I
Total 4.8294 11.1249 I 14,5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,201.sso 12,201.Gso I o.1uo 3 3
2,225.510
4 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-202

~f;f;MQ(J.. Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.5 Paving -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
HatJling
Vendor
Worker
Tota.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive j Exhaust
PMIO PMI0
ll>(day
PM10
Total
Fugitive j Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2-5
PM2.5
Total
Bi<>-CO2 1 ~ CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4 N20 C02e
ll>(day

0.QOOQ I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.QOOQ I 0.0000 : I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.QQOO I I 0.0000 -0.0000 -:--0~0000-:-0.0000-:-0.0000 -;-o.cmo--:-0~0000-:-0.0000 -: -0.0000 -:-0:0001-:-o~-:------:-0.0000 -:-0.0000 -:-o~ooo-:------0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
______ L _____ J ______ J ______ L ______ l ______ i ______ L _____ J ______ J ______ ~ ______ J ______ L ______ • ______ J ______ , I O.O!>SQ : 0.0370 : 0.5208 : 1.6~~e--: 0.1677
1 t.2~~e-: 0.1089
1 0.0445 : 1.~~e--: 0.0456 : : 160.08Q5: 160.0895: 4J)~~-: : 160.1Q06

0.0589 0.0370 0.5208 I 1.6100e-I 0.1677 11.2100 ... I 0.1689 003 003 o.0445 I 1 ~0~ ... 0.0456 1so.oss5 I 160.08s5 I .i_o~ 3 o.-160.1906
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02
Category
Off-Road 1.1028 11.124Q 14.5805 0.0228
Paving 3.7256
Tola.I 4.829,4 11.1249 I 14,5805 I 0.0220
Fugitive I Exhaust
P!.110 Ft.110
ic-(day
Pl,\10
ToCal

0.567Q 0.567Q

0.0000 0.0000

0.5679 0.5679
Fugitive I Exhaust
P!.12.5 Ft.12,5
PM2.5
Total

0.5225 0.5225
I 0.()()()() I 0.0000

0.5225 0.5225
Bio-CO2 I ~ CO2 I Tolal CO2 I CH4 N20 C02e
~day
Q,QOOO I 2,207,660 I 2,207.660 I 0.7140 I I 2,.225.510
I 3 I 3 I I I 4
,_ - - - - -l. - - - - --L - - - - -.J_ - - - - -J. - - - - - -· I : Q.0000 I I : Q.0000

0.0000 I 2,201.660 j 2,201.s60 I 0.1140
3 3
2,225,510
4 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-203

~Version: CalEEMod2016_32 Page 19 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer

3.5 Paving -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Waker
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I ExhMJst
PM10 PM10
U>(dsy
PM10
Total
Fugnive Exhaus1
PM2_5 PM25
Pf,f2_5
Total

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bi<>-C02 l~C02I TotalC021 Qi4 N20 002e
l>(dsy

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000
-0.0000 -:--o~OOOO-~ -O.OCOO -~ -0.0000 -~ -o~OOOO--:-O~-~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-0«.00-~ -0~0000-:------~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-OJ>OOO-~ ------: 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I
I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
------~-----~------{------~------:------f------~------:------~------~------f------~-----~------~------:. . I 0.0589 , 0.0370 , 0.5208 , 1.6100e-, 0.1677 1.2100e-, 0.1689 0.0445 , l.1100e-0.0456 • , 160.0895, 160.0895, 4.0500e-, , 160.1906

0.0589 0_0370
003 003 003 : 003
0_5208 I 1.6100e-I 0_1677 11,21000-I 0.1689
003 003
o.0445 I 1.1100 ••
003
0_0456 160_0895 I 160.0895 I 4.osoae.
003
160.1906

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
Category
Archit. Costing
Off.Road
Total
ROG I NOx I co I S02 I Fugitive Exheu!l I PM10 Pl.110
PM10 Fugitive Exhaust
Total f't.12.5 l't,12.5
il>jday
PM2.5
Tolal B<o-C02 I llleiR,C021 TotalC021
O,,day
CH4 I N20 I C02e
346.0974 : : 0.00QO : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : Q.000() : : 0.0000 : I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I
-0.2045 -:--1~408s-~ --1.8136 -~ 2:07~-:-----~ -0.0817-~ -0.0817 -~ ------:--0~081_1_ ~ -0~1-1 -:------T 281~4481-: 281~«81 :--o~183-~ ------._: -211-,-_-ll00-2-tl 003 •
346_3019 I 1-4085 I 1-8136 I 29:0~--i I 0.0817 I 0_0817 I lt 0_0817 I 281-4481 I 281-4481 I 0.0183 I -1 281_9062
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-204

~l;f;MQ(J.. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page20of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin. Summer

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hat.1ling
Vendor
Wo<1<er
Tota.I
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PMt0
11>/dey
PMt0
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM25
PM2.5
Total
Bi<>-Co21~co21 TolalCC21 CH4 N20 C02e
&,(day

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
-0.0000 -:--o~OOOO-:-0.0000-:-0.0000 -:-o~OOOO -:-O~OOC)Q-:-0.0000 -:-0.0000 -:-0~0000-:-0:-0000--~------:-0.0000 -:-0.0000 -:--0:0000-:------: 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
- - --- -:---- ---:-- --- --:-- - ----:---- ---:-- --- -·i------:-- - - - --:-- --- --:--- - ---:-- - - - --:• - - - - - -:--- - - --:- - - ----:-- - ---:-1 Q.5457 I Q.J4-28 I 4.8263 I Q.Q14Q I 1.5537 I 0.0112 I 1.56,4g I 0.4121 I 0.0•103 I 0.4223 • I 1.483.495 I 1.483.411!) I Q.Q3]5 I I 1.484.433

0.5457 0.3428 4.8263 0.0149 1.5537 0.0112 1"5649 0.A121 0.0103 0.A223 • 8 8 0
1,483.49511,483.4951 o.o31s
8 8
1,484.433
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PMtO
Category ~day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Sic,. CC2 I ~ CO2 I Tolal CC2 I CH4 N20 C02e
U,..,dat
An:M Coaijng IJ 346.0974 : I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0,0000 Q,OOQO I 0.0000 '
Off-Rood
______ I _______ I ______ .1 _______ I _______ I ______ _I _______ I _______ I ______ _I. _____________ I _______ I_ ______ I _______ I _______ 1----1

0.2045 : 1.4085 : 1.8136 : 2.9700e-: : 0.0817 : 0.0817 : : 0.0817 : 0.0817 0.0000 : 281.4481 : 281.«81 : 0.0183 : : 281.0C.:,2 003
Total 346.3019 I 1.40s5 u136 1 2.9l~ 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 I 2s1M81 I 2s1M81 I 0.0183 281.9062 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-205

~I;!;;~~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin. Summer

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NO, co
Category
S02
Hauling 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 '
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
IP(doy
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exha\Jst
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total

0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000
' .
e;c,-co2 l~co2I Tota1co2I CH4 N20 C02e
ll>(day
1 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' ' 0.0000
______ I _______ I ______ -~ ______ I _______ I ______ -~ ______ I _______ I _______ I ______ -::-______ I _______ I _______ I _______ I ______ '----t

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : O.OCX>O : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0,0000 : 0,0000 : : Vendor 0.0000 Wco<er - - - - --:-- - - - -~ - - - - - -~ - - - - - -~ - - - - --:-- - - - -~ - - - - - -~ - - - - --:-- - - - -~ - - - - - --:-- - - - -~ - - - - - -~ - - - - --:-- - - - -~ - - - - - -; I 0.5457 , 0.3428 , 4.8263 , 0.0149 , 1.5537 , 0.0112 , 1.5649 , 0.4121 , 0.0103 , 0.4223 , , 1,483.495, 1,483,495, 0.0375 , , 1,484,433 Total 0.5457 0.3428 4-8263 0.0149 1.5537

4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

0.0112 1-5649 0.4121 0.0103 0.4223
: 8 8 • 0
1~.49511,48~.495 I 0.0375 1,484.433
0 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-206

wJ!l;f;MQ(j_ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM ROG
Category
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Summer l'IOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
~doy
PMIO
Tolal
Fugitive I Exhausl
PM2.5 Pt.12.5

I I I I I I I I I
PM2.5
Total
Bio-c02 I~ c021 ro1a1 CO2 I CH4
ll>/doy
: 0.671.144: g,671.144: 0.2051
7 7
N20 002e
' : Q.676.273
' 0
Mitigated I~ 1.0029 : 1.W55 : 26.1424 : 0JJQ69 : V838 : 0.061Q : 9.11457 : 2-5936 : 0.0570 : 2.6506 --Un;;.;g.ted - - -,.om -i--, ~9055-l 211~ 1424-t -o.~g -I -i 7838 l ()CC,1Q -t -g 6457 -I -z°:51136 y -0~0570-1-il55<Xl -------r g_l,i~~144rgi1;144 1-0~2051-
1------
1 Q.117~.273

4.2 Trip Summary Information
I Average Daily Trip Rale I Unmitigated I Mitigaled
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building : 19.00 , 19.00 , 19.00 : 136,850 : 136,850 ·mi:~; ;..;i,i,:..i,·s~rt~~;; · •· · · · · · · · · = ----o~oo -----:----o.iio ----:----o iio ---r --------------------:
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :~~~~~? :L:o:t:::::::::::::::: 1 : : : : E:o~: : : : J: : : : ~-~~ : : : : : : : : ~.~~ : : : ] : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ] : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :; Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail : 553.95 ' 553.95 ' 553.95 : 4,550,823 : 4,550,823 Total I 572.95 I 572.95 572.95 I 4,687,674 I 4,687,674

4.3 Trip Type Information
f Miles f Trip% f Trip Purpose%
, ......... Land Use ........ f H-W or C-W j H-S or C-C j H-O or C-NW ( H-W or c.wj H-S or C.C j H-O or C-NW j Primary j Diverted j General Office Building : 24.20 24.20 24.20 : 33.00 48.00 19.00 : 77 , • • • • • • • • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ..... ---- -----1---------1---------_,._ -- -----I-- -------I -------- --"---- ------- Other Asphatt Surfaces : 16.60 : 8.40 : 6.90 : 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00 : o 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■.. I I ■ I I ■ Parking Loi : 16.60 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 : O
, •••••••••••••••••••••••••• --- - - - - - - _, - - - - - - --·--- - - - - - -..,;-- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --=--- - - - - - - - - Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No : 24.20 24.20 24.20 : 59.00 0.00 41.00 : 92

4.4 Fleet Mix
19 0
0 5
Pass-by
4 ~J
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-207

~RO-Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page23of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.60301&,: 0.0470371 0.2205061 0.1294391 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.0000001 0.000000; 0.000000, • ■ I I I I I I I I I I
--------------------~-------~------7-------r------7-------r------7-------r------7-------r------7-------r------------ Olher Asphalt Surfaces : 0.552111: 0.043066, 0.201891, 0.118512, 0.015605, 0.005863, 0.021387, 0.031253, 0.002087, 0.001818, 0.004803, 0.000708, ■ ■ I I I I I I I I t I I
-------p;rki~-Lot------:-O~s521-11:"-0.04J06&-0201891~ -0_11-s512~ -O~o156o5~ -o_oo-s863~-O~o213a7~ -0.031253~-0:0020a7~ -o.00181a~ -0:004803~ -o_oo-o70a~,---- • ■ I I I I I I I I I I I
--------------------~-------•------~-------r------~-------r------~-------r------~-------r------~-------r-------r-----t Unrefrigeraled Warehouse-No Rail

0.60301S: 0.0470371 0.2205061 0.1294391 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx co
Catego,y
S02 Fugitive I Exttaust
Pf.110 Pt.110
ll>(day
PM10
Tolal
Fugitiw I E>ct\aust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
.......,_ ~ oooro : o= , =' : ,_, : •= : o.= : : O •~ , o= .. titigated : : : 003 : : : : : :
--~---00370 T-0-3366-r 0282_7_ r 2:0:-r-----r 00256-
1-00256-
1-----r-0~0256-r 0-0256-
Bio-CO2 I ~CO2! TolalC021 CH4 N20 C02e
U>/day
! 400.8978 ~ 403.8978 ! 7J~ ~ 7.4000e. ! 406.2980
003 003 ' I I I I I
------r 403~8-Q?S
1 403~8978
1-i.r: 1-7~~: 1 4()6_2Q80
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-208

~M,@. Version. GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Summer

5.2 Energy by Land Use -~
Unmitigated
I~
Landu ... ~
General Office , 1ll0.137
Build-,g
Olher AsphsH , 0
Surfaces
Psfl<inglot 0
Unrefrigerated 3242.99
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total
ROG NOx co SO2

2.060Qe. ; 0.0186 I 0.0157 I 1.1000e-I
003 004
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pt.110
~dey
PMI0
ToW
I 1.420Qe. ; 1.4200e-I
003 003
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
I 1_420()e. ; 1.420()e..
003 003
Bio-c02 I t:leiP-c02I T o1a1 co2 CH4 N2O C02e
~dey
1 22.3691 1 22.3691 1 4.30Q0e... : 4. IOQOe. : 22.5020
004 004
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
-01)000-:-0.0000-~ -o~OOOO--:--oJ)OOO-:------~ -0.0000-:--o~OOOO-~ ------~ -0.0000-:--0.0000-: ------:--o~OOOO-;-0.0000-~ -0.0000-:--o~OOOO-i 0.0000 1 -oJ>OOO-~ -0_0000-~ -o~ciooo-:--0:-0000-~ --- ---~ -o_ciocxi-:-_o__OOIX)_ ~ ----- -~ -tioooo-:--O.oocxi-~ ------:--0~0000-~ -Q_OCXX)-~ -0_0000-:--0~0000-I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I : I I I I I
' ' --_,_ --~ - -~ --_,_ --'-- -~ - --·-

0.0350 0.3179 0.2671 l.0100e-:
003

0.0242 : 0.0242

0.0370 0.3:166 0.2827 2.0200e--0.0256 0.0256
003
' '-- -.....
' 0.0242 '

0.0256
. '

0.0242 :------~ i1.52aa: 381-6288 ~ 7 i100e-~ 6.~ I 383 7960 • I. 100310031 -

0.0256 403.8978 I 403.8978 I 1.1400e-1 1.4O00e-I 406.2980 003 003
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-209

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer

5.2 Energy by Land Use-~
Mitigated
Lendt.ls@
General Office
Building
Other Asphalt
Su,faces
Parlang Lot
Unrefrigerated
warehouse-No
Rail
Total
~!
sUse '
~
; 0.100137
' 0
----0
: 3.242QQ

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx co SO2 F~itrve I Exhaust
Pl.110 Pl.110
&,ldey
PM10
Tclal
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl.12.5
PM2.5
Tc>lal
Bio-c02 I !lleiP< c02J T o1a1 co2
&,ldey
Oi4 N20 C02e

2.0600e-, 0.0186 ; 0.0157 ; 1.1000e-; ; 1.4200e-; 1.4200<>-; , U200e--; 1.4200e--; 22.3601 ; 22.3601 ; 4.3000e-; 4. 1000e-; 22.5020 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
-0:0000-: -0_0000 -~ -o~OOOO -:-0~0000-: ------~ -0.0000-:--0~0000-~ ---- --~ -0.0000 -:--o.ocm - ------:--0~0000-: -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:--0~0000-I 0.0000 ------~------~------1------~------L------•------J------L------•-------------1------~------L------1---------- Q_CX)(X) : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : OJ:X)OO : : 0.0000 : 0.00CXl : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 1 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
------~------L------'------~------L ______ , ______ J ______ L ______ , _____________ 1 ______ J ______ L ______ 1 _____ _

0.0350 : 0.3179 : 0.2671 : 1.0100 ... : 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 0.0242 381.5288: 381.5288 : 7.3100e-: 6.9900@. : 383.7Q60 0031 100310031

0.0370 0.3366 0.2827 2,0200 ...
003

0.0256 0.0256 0.0256 0.0256 403.8978 J 403.8978 J 7.7400e• I 7.4000e• J 406.2980 003 003
~1M~g~onMe~urasAraa
~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-210

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page26of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:10 PM Cetegory
Mitigated
Unmitigated
9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, summer ROG NOx co S02
13Jl324 1 5.0000e-; 0.0641 1 0.0000 1
004
'

13.9324 - - - - --1------ 5~-1 00641 0.0000
Fugitive Exhau.st
Pl.110 Pl.110
~day
P!.110
Tola!
I 2.J000e-; 2.JOOOe-I
004 004
Fugitive I E><haust
Pt.12.5 Pl.12.5
Pt.12.5
Tolal
2_3000e-; 2..3000e-:
004 004
Bio-c02 I ~ co21 ro1a1 co2 CH4
ll>{day
Q.137J I Q.13]J I J.6QOOe-I
004
' -----·1-- - - - -2.3000e-
004
2~ 1------i-2.3:1-2.~ -;------' 0.1373 - - - - --1----- - 0.1313 I 3.~- N20 C02e
I 0.14eJ

0.14153

6.2 Area by~
Unmitigated
~
Architectural
Coating
Consumer
Products
Lsndscsping
Total
ROG NOx co S02

1.6120 ,
Fug,we I Exhaust
PM10 PMI0
ll>{day
PMt0
Total
I 0,0000 ; 0.0000 I
Fug~ive j Exhaust
PM25 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I Q,0000 I Q,OC()O
Bio-CO2 ,~co21 TolalC02
ll>iday

I Q,QQOO I
CH4 N20 C02e
t 0.0000
I I I I I I I I I • I I I ~•----4 -,2.3145-~-----·:· -----~------~ -----·:· -Q~oooo-~-0.0000 ·; ·· ----~-Q~oooo-~--o~ooio--=-----,------~ · 0.0000 ·~ -----~------I 0.0000 : : : : : : : : : I : : : :
5~97~-~ 5.~--:-0~1-~ -0.0000 · ~ ------:-2.~ ~ -2~~-; ------~ i~ ~ -2.3000e: -: -----,-0.1373-~ -0.1373 -~ 3.~ ~ ------·, -0.-1-415-3--t 000:004: : : :004:004: :004:004• I : :004:

13.9324 J 5.9000e-J 0.0641
004

0.0000 2.3000e-l 2.3000.-
004 004

2.3000e-l 2.3000e-
004 004

0.1373 0.1313 l 3.so00e-
004

0.1463
~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-211

~Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page27of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM

6.2Areaby~
Mitigated
~
Arohitecrural
Coating
ROG NOx
1,6120 :
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
ll>/day
PM10
Total

0.0000 0.0000
Fugitive Exhaust
PM25 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total

0.0000 0.0000
Bio-co2 I l)ll!R-co2 I Total co2
lt>/day

0.0000
Cfi4 N20 C02e

0.0000
' I ' I I I I I I : I I I I
------L------•------J-•----L•-•---1------~------~------~-----J·-----·r··--•••••••-L------~---•-J•••••·~--- Consumer Products

12.3145 ' 1 0.0000 1 o.ocoo 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 1 1 ' 0.0000 • I ______ , ______ -·-_____ _I ______ , _______ 1 _______ , ______ ·'· ______ 1 _______ , _______ .._ ____________ ·'· ______ 1 _______ , ______ .'-----I

5.9700e-: 5.0000e-: 0.0641 : 0.0000 : : 2.3000e-: 2.3000e-: : 2.3000e-: 2.3000e-: I 0.1373 : 0.1373 : 3.6000e-: ' 0031004 I I 1004 0041 1004 004: I I 1004
Landscaping
Total 13.9324 I s.sooo ... I 0.0641
004

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational ~
Equipment Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment

0.0000
Number
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
23000 ...
1 2.3000 ...
004 004
23000e-1 2.3000e-
004 004
Hours/Day DaysNear Horse Power

0.1373 o.13n I 3.6000.-
004
Load Factor Fuel Type

0.1463

0.1463
~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-212

~ Version: GalEEMod 2016_3 2 Page 28 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:10 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Summer Equipment Type Number Hours/Day HoursNear Horse Power load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat I npuVDay Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-213

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars south Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses ] Size ] Metric I Loi Acreage I floor Surface Aiea I Population General Office Building 20.00 1000sqfl 0.46 20,000.00 , 0 ■ I I I
--------------------------~----------------------------------------------·-------y------------~----------------~--------< Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail : 583.10 1000sqfl 15.54 583,100.00 0 ------◊lh~~A.-ph;1,s~.i.~.-------=------------.. 6~00-----------------------A~;e------------~ ----,soo----T----696,960~0-0----0 ----------Pa-rki~g-Lot ---------~------------8~18 -----------------------A~;e-----------· r-----8. 18----· 1----356,320~8-0----I 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (mis) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2022
Utility C ornpa ny Riverside Public Utilities
CO2 Intensity 1325.65 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (lt!/~ (lt!/~ (~

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-214

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page2 0128 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Winter Project Characteristics -See SWAPE comment regarding CO2, CH4, and N2O intensity factors.

Construction Phase -Total construction length consistent with information provided in the DEIR, but phase lengths are ~anered.

Vehicle Trips -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Grading -
Trips and VMT -See SWAPE comment regarding vendor and worker trip numbers.

Architectural Coating -See SWAPE comment regarding architectural coating emission factors.

Fleet Mix -See SWAPE comment regarding operational vehicle fleet mix. Only passenger cars. Trucks reduced to O; passenger car percentages proportionally altered based on ~defauns. See construction calculations.

Energy Use-
Water And. Wastewater -See SWAPE comment regarding indoor water use rate.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding the PM10 and PM2.5 % reductions.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name
l
Column Name
l
Default Value
J
New Value
~ ~ 55.00 17.00
--------------------------,-------------------------.--------------------------,-------------~ ~ ~ 740.00 227.00 ,---------------------------------------
~ ~ 75.00 46.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ ~ ~ 55.00 17.00
--------------------------~-------------------------r---------------------------------------~ ~ ~
~
--------------------
~b~e
~
~~~

18.00 - - - - - - --- - ----- - - - - - - - - --: 612912022 I 5/1212022

30.00 1112712024
612612024
~ : ~ --------------------------,-------------8125/2021 6/29/2021 --------------------------,-------------------------~--------------------------,-------------~ ~ ~ 9/11/2024 616/2022
~bas,:, ~odJ:We
--------------------------,-------------1
4126/2021 5/1212021
-------------------------- -------------------------·--------------------------,-------------~ ~bil,ll,:, elw~~ 9/12/2024 617/2022 --------------------------------------~
~ ~ 8126/2021 6/30/2021
- - -~ - - -l,-- - --~-- - -.;. - - - --5,1312021 - - - -I 4/27/2021 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-215

~l;f;MQIJ. Version: CalEEMod.2016_3 2 Page3 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter -- - - ---~ -- --_ J _ -- - -- --~-- - -- --_ J_ _ --------~~~~~~4-- - - --- - - -~I ____ _ ~ : HHD : 0.03 :
5113/2022
--

0.00 . . --------------------------,-------------------------~--------------------------------- ~ HHD 0.03 0.00
1-------------------------->-------------------------4--------------------------:~------- ~ LOA 0.55 0.60
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------c-------- ~ LOA 0.55 0.60
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------~------ ~ LOT1 0.04 0.05
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------,------- ~ LOT1 0.04 0.05 1 ---------------~----------~-------------------------~-------------------------- ~ : LOT2 : 0.20 0.22
1---------~ ---------; -----------LOT2 ----------;------------0.20 ----------- . . -------------------------->-------------------------4--------------------------'------- -

0.22 -
~ LHD1 0.02 0.00
1 --------------------------~-------------------------J _________________________ _ ~ : LHD1 : 0.02
--------------------------~-------------------------;--------------------------~ ~ : LHD2 : 5.8630e-003 '

0.00 ~

0.00 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------.------- ~ LHD2 5.8630e-003 0.00
- ·-------------------------------------------------------------------,------- ~ MCY 4.8030e-003 0.00 1 --------------------------r-------------------------~-------------------------- ~ : MCY : 4.8030e-003 -- . .
-

0.00 - -------------------------->-------------------------~--------------------------~------ ~ : MDV 0.12
1-----------___ -____ ----------_ -----------_____ -----------_------------_ ------------------- ~ MDV 0.12

0.13 -0.13
1----------=-- --- - - - - --- ----- ----~:-- --- --- - - - - --- -----:~::::::::--- --- - - -------0.00 0 00
--------------------------: -------------------------:--------------------------'------- ~ MHD 0.02 ' 0.00
. . ''-------- ----------~~~ ---------=------------,AHO ------------=------------0.02 -----------: 0 00 . . --------------------------r-------------------------~--------------------------,------- ~ OBUS 2.0870e-003 0.00 . . -------------------------->-------------------------4--------------------------,------- ~ OBUS 2.0870e-003 0.00 . . --------------------------~-------------------------J--------------------------~------ ~ : SBUS : 7_0800e-004 , 0.00
~ ~ SBUS 1 7.0SOOe-004 --------0.00
1 --------------------------: -------------------------:-------------------------- ~ : UBUS : 1.8180e-003 . .

0.00 ~ :------------UBUS----------1 1.8180e-003 I 0.00
I
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-216

~ version: GalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page4 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM ~ 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Winter ----------~ --------J _ --------~--------_ ]_ _ ---------_1 :~3~ - - - - - - - - - -_ I I ~ : CC_Tl : 8.40 '

15.54 24.20
1 ~ r cc_TL 1 8.40 : 24.20
--------------------------~---------------------------------------------------;--------------1 ~ : Crffl_Tl 6.90 24.20
---------~ --------;----------c1m:n----------------------siio-----------

24.20 ~ i CW_Tl 16.60 ~-----------1 24.20
~ ' CW_Tl 16.60 24.20
--------------------------,---------------------------------------------------~------------.... ~ ST_TR 2.46 0.95
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ _______________ i : :: I ~ ST_TR 1.68
~ • SU_TR 1.05
~ ; SU_TR 1.68 0.95
1---------= - --- - -F - - - - - - - -:::-- ------------------·;~ - --- - - -----: :: I

2.0 Emissions Summary
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-217

~~oo_ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
Ye.ar
2021
2022
M:a:,cimum
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exltau51
PM10 Pl,110
lt>(day
PMIO
Total
Fugitive E><t,o....t
Pl,12.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bi<>-co2 I ~ c02I Total c02
U>(day
CH4 N20 C02e

5.9025 ; 46.4598 ; 47.1569 ; 0.1659 ; 18.2675 ; 2.0460 ; 20.3134 ; 9.9840 ; ·J.8823 ; 11.6663 : 0.0000 I 16,895.56; 16.81l5,56; 1.9484 ; 0.0000 ; 16,927.92 : : : : : : : : : : 124
1 24:: :03
34e~004i ~ -42.0io1-:-«.i115 ~ -0.1627 -~ -0.4013 -:--0~0124-~ -,o~4{f.37-~ -25565 -:--0~8580-~ --3~4145-~--o~OOOO-1-16.5i4~s2~ 16:574.Si:--1~2548-~ -O.OOCXl -, 16,606. u,1 I I I I I I I I I : I5g15g1 I 163
346,9048 I 46.459s I 47.1669 0.1659 18.2675 2.0460 I 20_3134 9.9840 1.8823 11.8663 0.0000 I 16,s95.56116,ss5.56 I 1,9484 24 24

0.0000 I 16,921.92
93 Mitigated Construction
Year
2021
2022
Maximum
Per-cent
Reduction
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhausl
PM10 Pl,110
lt>(doy
PMIO
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl,12.5 Pl,12,5
PM2.5
Total
Bi<>-C02 (~c021 TotalC02
U,.,day
CH4 N20 C02e

5.9025 , 46.4598 , 47.1009 , 0.1659 , 18 .. 2675 , 2.0460 , 20.3134 , 9.9840 , 1.8823 , 11.6663 ; 0.0000 I 16,895.56• 16,Bll5.56, 1.9484 , 0.0000 , 16,927.92 I I I I I I I I I : 24 I 24 I I I OJ
I I I I I I I I I • I I ' I I
______ ... ______ , ______ ... ____ --... --_ -_ -•------... ------... -_ ---_,_ -----..i ------...,._ ------------... - - ----•------... ------1 346.9048 • 42.0701 • 44.7715 ° 0.1627 ° 9.4913 ° 0.9124 ° 10.4037 ° 2.5565 • 0.8580 • 3.4145 " 0.0000 I 16,574.82• 16.574.82 • 1.2548 • 0.0000 ° 16,606.19 I 59
1 50
1 68
346.9048 I 46.4598 I ,1.1669 0.1659 18.2675 2.0460 I 20.3134 I 9.9840 ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitiw
PM10 PM10 Toal PM2.5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.8823 11.8663
Exhaust PM2.5
1'112.5 Total

0.00 0.00

0.0000 ( 16,895.56116,895.56 I 1,9484
24 24
Bio-CO2 NBio-C02 Total CO2 CH4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0000 I 1s,921.92
93 N20 CO2e

0.00 0.00
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-218

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Category
Area
Energy
Mobile
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugaive I Exhaust
PJ.110 Pl.HO
ll>/doy
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-co2 I ~ c02 J Total co2
ll>(dey
CH4 N20 C02e

13.9324 1 5.0000e-1 0.0641 1 0.0000 , 1 2.3000e-, 2.3000e-, , 23000@-, 2.3000e-I 0. t373 1 0.1373 1 3.6000e-, 1 0.1483 l()(),4I I I 10()410041 10041004. I 1()()41 I
------~-----~------~------~------:------~------~------~-----~-------~-----J------~------~-----~------• I 0.0370 , 0.3366 , 0.2827 , 2.02000-, , 0.0256 , 0.0256 , , 0.0256 , 0.0256 : I 403.8Q78 , 403.8Q78 , 7.7400e-, 7.4000e• , 406.2Q80 003' I I I : I : I : :003:003:
------L-----~------J ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ L ______ L _____ J _______ ~ ____________ L ______ L _____ J ______ , I O.Q325 ~ 2.0861 ~ 23.2541 ~ O.OQ08 ~ Q.7838 I 0.061Q ~ Q.8457 ~ 2.5Q36 ~ 0.0570 2.6506 I Q,064.188: Q,064.188: 0.1Q04 1 : Q,068_Q48 I 2 1 2 , 1 0

14.9019 2.4233 23.6010 0.0929 9.7838 0.0877 9.8715 2.5936 0.0828 2.676A 9,46~.22319,4~223 I 0.1985 11~-19,47~.392 Mitigated Operational
category
Area
Energy
Mooile
Tot.I
ROG NOx co S02

13.Q324 5.9000e-; 0.0641 0.0000
004
Fugitive Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
ll>/day
PM10
Total

2.30000-; 2.3000e-
004 004
Fugrtive I Exhoust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total

2.3000e-; 2.3000e-:
004 004 :

Bio-C02 l~C02i Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
ll>(day

0.1373 0.1373 3.6000e· ; 0.1463
004
-0.0370 -~ -0.3366 -:-0282,-~ -2o2~ ~ ------:--0~0256-~ -0.0256 -~ ------~ -0~0256 ~ --o~o2M--r ------1 -400_gg7s ~ 40a~sg78-~ 7.7~-~-,~4000e~ I 406.2QSO I : : : 003 : : : : : : : I : : 003 : 003 :
______ L ______ , ______ J ______ L ______ I ______ J ______ L ______ L _____ J _______ ~-----~------~------L _____ J ______ • I

0.9325 : 2.0861 : 23.2541 : 0.0908 : 0.7838 : 0.0619 : 0.8457 : 2.5936 : 0.0570 : 2.6506 : I 9,064.188: G,064.188: 0.1904 : : 9,068.948 • 2 I 2 I I I Q

14..9019 2.4233 23.6010 0.0929 9.7838 0.0877 9.8715 2.5936 0.0828 2.676A 9,468.223 I 9,468.223 I 0.1985 I 7.4000.-I 9,475.392 3 3 003 4
~l
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-219

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page7 of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:11 PM ROG
Percent 0.00
Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
: Site Preparation
NOx

0.00 1
------,---------------------
2 :Grading
13 _____ : Building Construction _______ _
14 : Paving
IS : Architectural Coating
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter co S02 Fugitive Exh.ilu.st Pll10
PM10 Pll10 Toal

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Phase Type Start Dale
Sile Preparation , 41112021
Fugitive Extl.ust PM2.5 Bio-CO2
Pll2.5

0.00 End Dale
, 4126/2021
PM2.5 Tobi

0.00 0.00 0.00
Num Days I Num Days
Week
5, 18,
NBio-C02 ToblC02 CH4

0.00 0.00 0.00
Phase Description

I I I I I
~~·~~~:::::::::::::: ?~~~~~~::: :[6~9~0~~:::: I::::::~[::::: ~~-1--------------1 Building Construction : 6/3012021 : 511212022 5: 227:
--------------------,-----------~----------~-------~-------------------~ Paving : 5/1312022 : 616/2022 s: 11:
. Architectural Coating 6ll/2022 6129/2022 SI 17
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): o
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 115
Acres of Paving: 24.18
N20

0.00 Residential Indoor: o; Residential Outdoor: o; Non-Residential Indoor: 904,650; Non-Residential Outdoor: 301,550; Striped Parking Area:
63,197 (Architectural Coating-~
OffRoad Equipment
C02e

0.00 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-220

~ Version: GalEEMod 2016.3.2 Page8of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3.11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name
l
~Equipment Type
l
Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Powe, I Load Facto,
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers , 3: 8.00: 247 1
-----------------------------------------------,---------------1·----------,-----------~-------4 Site Preparation Tractors/loadersfBackhoes 41 8.001 971

0.4(

0.3 G~adinQ -------------------e;~a~;t~~----------------"' --------------2:---------a~oo: ---------1 ss: 0.31 -----------------------------------------------~---------------1-----------~-----------~ Grading Graders 1: 8.00: 187: 0.4
------------------------~-----------------------•---------------1-----------•-----------~-------4 ---' Grading : Rubber Tired Doze rs 1: 8.00: 247: 0.4( ~~•~~n~::::::::::::::::::: ~~r~~~~:::::::::::::::::}:::::::::::::: ~!:::::::: :8~~o}::::::::: ~~7! 041 Grading Tractors/loaders!Backhoes 2: 8.00: 97: 0.3
I I I I. ______ ___,,
Building Construction Cranes ' 1: 7.oo: 231:

I I I I
,--------I
Building Construc1ion Forklifts : 3: 8.00: as:
-----------------------------------------------T---------------1-----------T-----------~--------il Building Construction Generalor Sets 1, 8.00, 84, 0.7< ::ti~::;:::::::::::: ~t;:t~;~;:::::::;::::::::::::: I::::::::~::;:::::::::: :a Paving Pavers : 2: 8.00: 130: -·
~~~~::::::::::::::::::::: ~~:~i ~~u~p:~e~~::::::::::: 1:::::::::::::: ~::::::::: ::~~:f::::::::: ~ ~:[ : :j

0.4:
-----------------------------------------------_______________ 1 ___________ -----------+------- Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.41
Trips and VMT
Phase Name ~Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip
Number Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
HauNng Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor I Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
I S~e Preparation
I
G~,;-ding ---------: ------------;------20_0_0~ ------o.oo:------0.00~ ------14.70~------6-9-0~ -----20~00~ ~ ------~ ~---,: HHDT I : I I I I I I I I ~
-------------------------------------4---------·------------------~---------~--------~---------------------~----~ 1: 1s.oo: o.oo: o.oo: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:~
I Buik1ing Construction 9: 694 oo: 211.00: o_oo: 1410: 6.90: 20.00:~ :~
: ~
:HHDT
:HHDT
!Paving
I Atchitectural Coating
6: 1s.oo:
139.00
o.oo:

0.00 o.oo:

0.00 14.10:

14.70 6.90:

6.90 20.00:~

20.001~
:~
~
____________ J _________ ~ ________ J ________ J _________ J _________ L ________ L ___________ J ________ ·····--I :HHDT
--------I______ I
HHDT
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-221

~ Version. GalEEMod.2016 3.2 Page9 of28 Date: 7120/2021 3:11 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co
Catogory
Fugitive Dust
502 Fugitive I Exmlus1
PM10 PM10
ll>(day
PM10
Tclal
Fugi1ive I EJ<heusl
Pl,12.5 PM2.5
1 18.0663 , 0.0000 18.0663 QJl307 1 0.0000 1
PM2.5
Total

9.9307
Bio-CO2 I t:/PiR-CO2 I Total CO2
a,/day
I 0.0000 t
CH4 N20 CO2•
I 0.0000
Ofl-Rosd ------:------~------~------~-----~------;------~------:------;------~------~------~-----~------;------: I 3.8882 I 40.4971 I 21.15,4J I 0.Q38Q • I 2.0445 I 2.0445 I I 1.880Q I 1.880Q : I 3.685,l:556 I 3,6&5.6561 1.192() I I J.715.457 Total 3.8882 40A911 I 21.1543 I 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 • g g 3
3,685.65613,685.656 I 1.1920
9 9
3,715.457
3 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-222

~~oo_ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -south Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
~day
PM10
Total
Fugtive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio-C02 l~C02I TolalC021 CH4 N20 002•
l>(dsy

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
I I I I I I I I I ; I I I I
---ve-;,do~ ---11 -0.0000 -:--o~ooo:>--: -O.ocxio -·:· -0.0(X)O -:--0,0000 -:--0:0000-·: -0.0000 -:--o~(X)()() -:-o~ocoo-·: --0:0000--=------·:· -0.0000 -:· -0.0000 -:--oJXlOO -·: I 0.0000 W«ker
Tota.I
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
-O.o-330 -:--0~0540-~ -o.e l 18 -: -1 ~8800~-~ -0~2012 -:-1.4~ ~ -0.2027 -~ -0.0534 -:-,-.3100e:: ~ -·o:0547 --:------: 186~8672 ~ 186~8672 ·:-5.oa00e: ~ ------I 186.9929 0-0830 0.0540
003 003 003 003

0.6118 I 1.ssoo .. 1 0.2012 11.49ooe-I 0.2021
003 003

0.0534 I 1.3100 ••
003

0.0547 186.8612 I 186.8612 I 5_0300..
003
186.9929
Mitigated Construction On-Site
C81egory
Fugiti'we Dus~
OIi-Road
Total
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl,110 Pt.110
lpldey
Pl.110
ToCsl
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl.12.5
PM2.5
Total
, 18.0663 : 0.0000 18.0663 : g_'13()7 0.0000 g.11307
Bio-co2 I~ c02 I Tolsl CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
~dey
I 0.0000 I I 0.0000
■ I I I I I
------~-----~------~------~-----~------~------~------:------~------~------~------~-----~------~------: I 3.8882 I 40.4071 I 21.1543 I 0.0380 I 1 2_0445, I 2_0445 I I l.880Q I 1.88@ ■ 0.000Q I 3,685.656 I 3,685.656 I 1.1Q20 I I J, 715.457

3.8882 40.4971 I 21. 1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8309 11.8116 g g 3

0.0000 I 3,685.65613,685.6561 1.1920
9 9
3,715A57
3 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-223

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 28 Date: 7120/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
catego,y
HatJling
Vendor
'Mlrker
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhoust
PM10 PMIO
l)l(day
PMIO
Total
Fugitive I Exhoust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total
Q,QOO() I Q.OOOQ I 0.00QQ I Q,OOQO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q,OOOQ I Q,000() I Q,OOQO 8ie>-C02 lb1B!R-C02I To<alC02 c~ N20
l>(day
I Q,Q(X)O I Q.000() I Q,0000 I
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
C02e

0.0000
-0.0000 -:--o~OOOO-; -0.0000 -; -0.0000 -; -o~OOOO -:-iOOOO-; -0.0000 -; -0.0000 -:-0:0000-; -iOOOO-:------; -0.0000 -; -0.00:,0 -:-0:00:0-; ------r, -0.-0000---il . ' I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
-0.0830 -;--o~oMo-~ -0.6118 -: -1~88~-~ -0~2012 -;-;_4~: -0.2027 -~ -0.0534 -;-l.j1cxie= ~ -OAJ54,-:------: :186~8672 ~ 186~8672·:-5.0300e~ ~ ------, 1sa.0020 003 003 003 003

0.0830 0.0540 0.6118 I 1.8800e-J 0.2012 J 1.4900e-I 0.2027 003 003

0.0534 1 1.3l
0 ~e-0.0547 126.8672 1 186.86121 5.o:
3 0e-186.9929

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02
catego,y
Fugi1ive Oust
Fugitive I Exh:aust
Pl.110 PM10
l>(day
PMIO
T-
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl.12.5
PM2.5
Total
, 8.6733 , 0.0000 , 8.6733 , 3.54165 , 0.0000 , 3.5965
Off-Road -4.1912 -:-46.3998 ~ -30~s785-; -0.0620 -~ -----~ -~,.gs53-: -1.Q853 -~ ------:--,~8265-~ --1ne6- Total 4.1912 46.3998 I 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 Bio-c02 I WiR-c021 Tcxai CO2
°"'
N20 C02e
l)l(day
I 0.0000 I , 0.0000
------; 6.007~~3 ~ 6,007.043 ~ --1~4is-: ------, 6.055.613 4 4 4
6,001.04316,001.043 I 1.9422
4 4
6,055.613
4 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-224

~ version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12of28 Date 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Calegory
Hauling
Vendor
Worker
Tola.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pt.110
u,/day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total
Q.QOOO I Q.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.QOOO I 0.0<XJO I Q.OOOQ I Q.OOOQ I Q.OCJOO I Q.QOOO I Q.OOQO a Bio-C02 l~C02I Total CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
l>(day
, 0.0000 , 0.0000 ; O.OIX>O 1 0.0000
------1------,------T------r------,------T------r-----,------,-------------T------r------,------,------: I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 : , 0.0000 1 0.0000 , O.OOCIO , 1 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
-o:o~i -:--o~OBOO-~ -oe1g7 -: -ios~-~ -ii:223i -:-,.6500.:: : -ii.2i!i2 -~ -o:o5Q3 -:-15200.:: ~ -0:0000--=------: 201~6302 ~ 201~113()2-:-5.5800e: ~ ------~, _20_1 __ -7BQ_s ...

0.0922
.. ·003' 0031 003 I I 1()()3 I

0.0600 0.6797 I 2.0BOOi,. I 0.2236 I 1.6500i,. I 0.2252 003 003

0.0593 1 1.5200.,.
003

0.0608 20,.6302 I 201.63021 5_5so0e-
003
207.7698
Mitigated Construction on-Site
caiegory
Fugitive Oust
Off-Road
TolaJ
ROG NOx co 502 Fu;gitive I Exhoust
PM10 Pt.110
ll>(day
PM10
Tolal
Fugitive I Exhaus.t
PM2.5 P"12.5
PM2.5
Total
, 8.6733 , 0.0000 , 8.6733 , 3.59e6 , 0.0000 , 3.5965 :

Bio-co2 J ~ CO2 I TcCal CO2 C84 N20 C02e
11>/day
! 0,0000 I I 0,0000
-4.1812 -i-4e.3QQS -1-30~s785-,--0.0620 -t-------1 -1_-11353--t -1.Q!853 -t-------i--,~82&3-~ --1:si65-~-0:0000-~ 6,007~043 ~ 6,007.0◄3~ --1~428--t ------I 6,0!>5.613

4.1912 46.399s I 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10,6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 I 4 ! 4 I I 4

0.0000 I 6,001.0431 s,001.043 I 1.9428
4 4
6,055.613
4 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-225

~Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.3 Grading -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
Category U>[dey
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
P!.12.5
Total
Bio-C02 l~C02I Total002
lt>(dey
CH4 N20 002e
Hauling 0.0000 j 0.QOOO I 0.0000 I Q.0000 I Q.OOQQ I Q.0000 I Q.0000 I Q,OQOO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 I 0.0000 • 0.0000 Vendor -0.0000 -;--o~OOOO-~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -~ -o~OOOO -;--oA>OOo-~ -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -;--oA>OOO-~ -0~0000-:------; -0.0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-0~0000-~ ------, 0.0000 --~ - --- --·---~ - -~ ---·---~ - -~ - --·-- -~ Worker 0.01122 0.oeoo 0.67117 2.0800e-' 0.2236 1.6500e-' 0.2252 0.05113 1.5200e- Total 0.0922 0.0600 0.6797 2.:: ... ' 0.2236 1.6::e.
1 0.2252 0.05113 1.57:e.
003 003 003

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
' o.ooos-:------~ 207.6302-; 201filJ2 ;-5.58~ ....

I I I (X)l

0.0608 201 .6302 I 201.6302 I 5a5sooe.
003
: 207.76QS
207.76118
ROG NOx CO S02 F;;t';-:;' ~~~t ~~ F~~ ~~ Pf!; I Bio-CO2 I llleiR-CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I 002e Category l&>(day u,/day
Off.l<osd 1.900G 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.(1586 0.(1586 0.9013 0.9013 , 2,553,363, 2,553,363, 0.6160 , 2,568,764 I Q I Q I I 3
Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-226

~ Version: GaJEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger cars -Soutn Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive Exllaust
PMIO Pt.110
u,{day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I E"'18\Jst
PM2 5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Hauling 0.0000 I Q.OQOO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.000Q Bi~C02 I11111r.-co21 TotalC02I CH4 N20 C02e
~day
I 0.000Q I 0.0QOO I 0.0000 I I 0.0000
Vendor -O.io;O -:-25.80181 -;_0050-1-0.0667 -r-1:134,--:-OA>541-1 · 1.7887 · r -0.4002 -:-O~o52J_ 1 _ 0~551_5_ :-----· 11.13f 42G f 7.13}429·:-OA84g -1------: 1. 14~.551 WO<ker
Totai
--~ - -_,_ --~ --~ --_,_ - -~ - -~ - --·---. - --:------~ - -~ - -_,_ --. -- 3.2005 : 2.oao5 : 23.5867 : o.0723 : 7.7573 : o.057~ : 7.8147 : 2.0573 : o.0529 ' 2.1101 : : 7.204.76!l: 7.204.76!l: 0.11138 ' : 7,209.et3 Q l Q I 4

4.0015 21 .s123 I 30.5911 0.1390 9.4914 0.1121 9.6034 2.5565 0.1051 2.6616 14,342.1TT 1~342.1 jf 0.6181 85 I 85
14,359.16
51 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhaust Pt.110 Fugi1ive Exhaus.t PM2.5 I s;~co21~c02I Tcxa1c02I CH4 I N20 I C02e Pt.110 Pt.110 T-PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category ll>(day u,{day
Off.Rosd 1.000Q I 17.4321 I 16.5752 I 0.02e9 ' ' o.95se ' 0.9586 ° ' 0.9013 ° 0.9013 0.0000 : 2,553.363 : 2,553.363: 0.6160 ' : 2,568.764 9 g 3
Tobi 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-227

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 F~ I Exhaust

PMIO PMIO
1l>(dey
PM10
Total
F~ I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 Pt.12.5
Total

0.0000
Bio-CO2 I~ CO2 I Total CO2 CH4
l>(dey
_ : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 :

N20 C02e

I Q,OQOO
______ , ______ J ______ ~------L------•------~------L ______ , ______ J ______ ~------~------L ______ I ______ J ______ ~---

0.8010 ' 25.8918 ' 7.0050 ' 0.0067 ' 1.7341 ' 0.0547 ' 1.7887 ' 0.4992 ' 0.0523 ' 0.5515 : ' 7.137.429' 7.137.429' 0.4849 ' ' 7.149.551 Vendor I I : : I I : : 5 : 5 : I ]
\/Vaker
Total
--~ --_,_ --~ - -~ - -_,_ - -~ - -~ - --·---~ ---=------~ - -~ - -_1_ - -~ 3.,2005 : 2.0805 : 23.5887 ' 0.0723 : 7.7573 : 0.0574 : 7.8147 : 2.0573 : 0.052G : 2.1101 : 7,204.769: 7,204.760: 0.1938 '

I Q I Q I

4.0015 21.9123 I 30.5911 0.1390 9.4914 0.1121 9.6034 2.5565 0.1051 2.6616 14,342.19, 14,342.19 I o.61s1 85 85

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 t,IPjp. CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PL110 Pt.110 Tolel PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category lt>(day 11>/dey
Off-Road 1.7062 I 15.015a I 16.3634 o.02eg 0.8090 0.8090 0.76·12 0.7612 I 2.554.333 I 2.554.3331 I
6 I
6 I

0.6120
Total II 1.706, I 15.6156 I 16.3634 0.0,69 0.8090 0.8090 0.761< 0.761< ,,554.333 ,,554.333 0.6120 6 6
N20 I

7.209.e13
4 14,359.16
51 002e
I 2.560.eJ2
' 2
,,569.63,
2 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-228

wJll;f;MOO. Version: Gal EE Mod 2016.3.2 Page 16 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3·11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
HatJling
Vendor
Waker
Tobi
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
U>(day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaus1
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bi<>-CO2 J ~ CO2 J Tolal CO2 J CH4 N20 C02e
ll>(day
=:=:=:=:=:~:=:=:=:=; :=:~:~: :~
I I I I I I I I I a I I I I I
-O.is19 -:-24.5154 ~ -6.6347-~ -0.0661-~ -1~7341--:-0:0476-1-;_73,7 -~ -0.4002 -:-O~o455-~ --0~5441--:------! 7.0iieQ9 ~ 7.073.eoo-:-0~46ig -~ ------: 1.085.305 I I I : I : I I t I : : 2 : 2 I : I g
_______ I------•-----------------•------• __ •------I __

3.0102 : 1.8791 : 21.7734 : 0.0697 : 7.7573 : 0.0558 : 7.8131 : 2.0573 : 0.0514 : 2.1086 : : 8,94(1.7;3: 8,Q4e.7Q3: 0.1750 : : 6.Q51.168

3.7621 26.4544 I 2s_4os1 0.1358 9.A913 0.1034 9,5947 2.5565 0.0969 2.6533 -1 1 7
14,020.49 I 14,020A9 J 0.6429
23 23
14,036.56
46 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PMI0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~CO2 TolalCO2 CH4 I N20 I C02e Pl.110 Pl.110 Tola! Pl,l2.5 Pl.12.5 Total
Category ll>(day U>(dey
Off.Road 1.7062 ' 15.61&3 ' 16.3634 I 0.0260 ' 0.8000 ' 0.8000 ' 0.7612 ' 0.7612 0.0000 : 2.s5:.333 : 2.s~.333: 0.6120 : 2.~.632 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-229

~ Version: C<IIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
category
Haulir~
Vendor
Worker
Tot.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
ll>/day
PM10
Total
Fug-I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM25
PM2.5
Total
Sic,. CO2 j l)ISR-CO2 j Total CO2 j CH4 N20 C02e
ll>(day

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 . ' ______ 1 ______ J ______ ! ______ L ______ 1 ______ 1 ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ ~ ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ • I

0.7519 : 24.5754 : 6.6347 : 0.0661 : 1.734t : 0.0476 : 1.7817 : 0.4Qg2 : 0.0455 : 0.5447 : : 7,073.69Q: 7,073.699: 0.467Q : : 7,085.395 I I I I I I • 2 I 2 I 9
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
, - - -,- - -r - -1 - --,-- -r - -1 - --,-- -T - --:------r - -~ ---,-- -T --,--- 3.0102, 1.8791, 21.7734, 0.0007, 7.7573, 0.05'58, 7.8131, 2.0573, 0.0514, 21086. ,fl.11467113,fl.9467113, 01750, ,fl.951.168

3.7621 26.4544 I 28.4081 0.1358 9,1913 0.1034 9.5947 2.5565 0.0969 2.6S33 1 7
1,,020_491 u,020,191 o.6429
23 23
14,036.56
46 3.5 Paving -2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
Category
Off.Rosd
Paving
Total
ROG NOx co S02

1.1028 ' 11.1249 14.5805 ' 0.0228 '
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Ft.110
l>(day
f't.110
ToCal
I 0.5679 I 0.567Q I
Fugitive Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pl.12.5
Total

0.5225 ' 0.5225

I I I I I I I I I

3.7266 : : : : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000

4.8294 11.1249 I 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 Bio-CO2 j WiR-CO2 I T olal CO2 CH4
ll>/day
: 2,207.1360: 2,207.660: 0.7140
3 3
N20 C02e
: 2,225.510
4 -------:-------:--o~OOOO -:------·:· ------: 0.0000 I 2,201.sso 12.201.660 I 0.1140
3 3
2,225.510
4 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-230

~J;l;;tll!OO. Version: GalEEMod 2016_3-2 Page 18of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.5 Paving -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
U>[dsy
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2_5 PM2-5
PM2.5
Total
6io-C02 l~C02I TolalC02
~dey
CH4 N20 C02e
---~•~I~~ ----~:-i_ -
0 ~~--i-~~--i-:: _i_ -
0 :~~ -i-~~~
0 -_[ -::~ -i--~~ -i--
0 ~~--i--
0 ~-~-------i-::~ -i--
0 :~ -i-~~~--i------i o.oooo I
-I~ , . . , , . . . . . . , . . ,
Vendor 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 o.ocoo 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 Worker
Total
. '
I I I I I : I I
-0.0651--:--0~0406-~ -0.4706-: -1~51~-~ -0~1611--:-1.21ooe:: -0.1680 -~ -0.0445 -:-I. i100e: ~ -0:0456--=------: 150-1468-~ 150~146s-:-iisocie= ~ --- ---I 150..2414 0_0651 0_1)406
003 003 003 : 003
0_4106 1 1.5100•-1 0_1611 11.2100 .. 1 0_1689
003 003
o.0445 I 1.1100 ..
003

0.0456 150_1468 j 150_1468 j 3-7800e­
Q03
150-2414
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Off-Road
PaWlg
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
1"'110 Pf.110
ll>(day
PM10
Total
Fug~ive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pf.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I l:liAA-CO2 I T olal CO2
U>[day
CH4 N20 C02e

1.1028 ; 1t.124Q ; 14.5805 ; 0.0228 ; ; Q_567g ; 0.567Q ; ; 0.5225 ; 0.5225 0.0000 : 2,207.660: 2,207.660; 0.7140 ; ; 2,225.fr10 • 3 3 4
------:------~------~------~-----~------~------~------:------~------------~------~-----~------~------: I 3.7266 I I 0.00QO I 0.00QO I I 0.0000 I 0.0QQO I Q.OQOO I I Q.OQOO

4.8294 11.1249 I 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 I 2,207.660 I 2,207.660 I 0.7140 3 3
2,225.510
4 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-231

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 28 Date 7/20/2021 3:11 PM

3.5 Paving -2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx
Category
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter co SO2 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 Pt.I10
IP{doy
PM10
Totol
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Totol
Bio-CO2 , ~ CO2 ( Total CO2
l>(doy
Off4
Hflllling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.OOOQ I Q.QOOQ I N20 002•
I 0.0000
'
Vendor
- - - - - -:--- - --~-- - ---~-- - - --~ --- ---:--- - - -~ ---- --~ ------:---- --~------.,:_ - - ---~ - - - - --~ - - ----:-- - - - -~--- - --: I

0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q_O(X)() I 0.QOOQ I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 : I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.QQOO I I 0.0000 ------1------~------~------~-----~------~------~------1------~------~------~------~------1------1------ Wori<er 0.0651 I 0.0406 I 0.4706 I 1.51CX)e-I 0.1677 1.21QOe-I 0.168Q Q.0445 1.1100e-I 0.0456 ■ I 150.1~8 I 15Q.14a8 I J.7800e• I ·003• 003 003 ; I I 1003
Total 0.0651 0.0406 OA706 f 1.5100e-I 0.1677 , 1.2100e-f 0.1689 003 003

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
Aichi!. Coating II 346.W74 ,
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl.110 Pl.110
l>(dey
PM10
Tolal
I Q_(X)()() I Q_(X)()() I
o.0445 I 1.1100 ..
003
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl.12.5

0.0456
PM2.5
Total
I Q_(X)OO I Q_()()()() ""'i'
150.1468 f 150.1468 f 3.7800..
003
Bio-CO2 I~ c021 Total co2 CH4
IP{doy
I Q_QOO() I
N20
150.2414
150.2414
CO2•

0.0000
Off-Road ------1------~------r------r-----~------T·-----r------1------T·-----~------T·-----r-----~------T·-----I 0.2045 I 1.4085 I 1.8136 I 2.Q]QOe.. I I Q.0817 I Q.0817 I I Q.081] I Q.0817 : I 281_4481 I 281_4481 I Q.Q183 I 281JX)62 Total 346.301 s I 1 AOss
003

1.s136 I 2_9100..
003

0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 2s1A481 I 2s1A481 I 0.0183 281.9062 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-232

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive Exhous1
PMI0 PMI0
U>(doy
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaus1
PM2-5 PM2-5
Ha:tJling 0.0000 ; 0.000IJ ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.000Q ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.000Q ; 0.0000 I PM2.5
Total

0.0000
Bi<>-C02I~e02I TolalC02 CH4
l>(doy
I Q_QCX)() ; 0.0000 ; Q_OOO() I
N20 C02e
I Q.OOOQ
Ve.ndor ------~-----~------~------~------:------~------~------:------~------~------~------~------:------~------: I 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 • , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , , 0.0000 ----------1r------•------~------... ------~ -----_,_ -----.. ------~ ------•-------I -------:------... - -----~ --- ---•---- - --I ------I Woricer I 0.6029 • 0.3764 ' 4.3610 ' 0.0140 • 1.5537 ' 0.0112 ' 1.5649 ' 0.4121 ' 0.0103 ' 0.4223 : '1.391.360 • 1.391.360' 0.0351 ' '1,392.237 · · · · · · · · · : e : 6 : : : o
Total 0.6029 0.3764 4.3610
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
Archit. Costing 11 346.0974 ,

0.0140
SO2

1.5537 0.0112
Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
ll>(doy

1.5649
PMI0
Total
I Q_(X)()() I 0.0000 I

0.4121 0.0103
Fugitive I Exhousl
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5

0.4223
PM2.5
Total
I Q_CX)O() I Q_()()()()
1,391.36011,3'31.360 I 0.0051
6 6
Bio-co21 ~ CO2 I Total CO2 CH4
U>(doy
I Q.OOOQ I
N20
1,3'32.237
0 C02e
I 0.000Q
---Oif.R~d--l-o.io4s -:--1~4085-~ --;.a1i-: -2:1>1oi,;.-~ -----~ -o.oa11-: -o.oi11 -~ ------:--o~os11-: -o:OS,-1---0:0000-• 2s1~«a1-~ 2i1~44S1 ~ -o:01i:i-: ------281.90621 I I I 003 : : : : : : I I .

Total 346.301s I u08s 1.8136 I 2.9700<>-
003

0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 I 2s1A481 I 281A481 I 0.0183 281.9062 ~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-233

~ Version: caJEEMod.2016_3_2 Page21 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

3.6 Architectural Coating -2022
Mitigated construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PMIO
lllfday
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2-5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Haulirtg 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 :
' .

Bic,.C02 l~C02I Tolal002 OH4
11>/day
I Q,QOOQ I Q,O(X)() I 0.0QOO I
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I
N20 C02e
I 0.000Q
Vendor -o.ocoo -:--0~0000-~ -o.ocoo-~ -0,0000 -~ -0.0000 -:-0:-0000-~ -0.0000 • ~ • 0.0000 •:-o~oooo• ~ • o~• :• • • • • • ~ • 0.0000 • ~ • 0.0000 •:• 0:-0000 • ~ • • • • • • I 0,0000 Waker ------1------~------~------L------•------~------L-----~------J------~------~------L-----~------J------• I 0.602Q : 0.3764 : 4.3610 : 0.0140 : 1.5537 : 0.0112 : 1.564Q : 0.4121 : 0.0103 : 0.4221 : : 1.30~_300: 1,3Q~.360: 0.0351 : : 1,3~ .. 237 Total 0.6029 0.3764 4.3610 0.0140 1.5537

4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

0.0112 1.5649 0.4121 0.0103 0-4223 1,391.36011,391.3601 0.0351 6 6
1,392.237
0 ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-234

~~M.QQ.. Version· GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page22 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM ROG NOx
Category
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
P!.110 Pl.110
l>(day
Pl.110
Tolal
Fugitive J Exhaust
PM2.5 Pl.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I ~ CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4
U>(day
N20 C02e
Moigated I~ 0.9325 ; 2.0861 ; 23.2541 ; 0.0908 ; 9.7838 ; 0.0619 ; 9.8457 ; 2.5936 ; 0.0570 ; 2.6506 : ; 9,064.188; 9,064.188; 0.1004 ; ; 9,068.948 I I I I I I I I I : I 2 t 2 I I I 0
I I I I I I I I I a I I I I I
--1.ki;;.tigeted---0.9325 T-£0001-r 23~£541-r -0.0908 T-ii:is:ii r o:00111 _ f _ 9.8457 T -25936 r -0~0570_ f _ 2Jl500--=------r ii,oof 188 I ll,~188 r O~1004 _ l _ ----I 9,oog948

4.2 Trip Summary Information
] Average Daily Trip Rate I Unmitigated I Mitigated
Land Use
l
Weekday J Saturday J Sunday
l
AnnualVMT
l
AnnualVMT
General Office Building : 19.00 ; 19.00 ; 19.00 : 136,850 : 136,850 ··········································~-- ---- ---- --i-- ---- --- --1--- --- - ---~---- - ----------------~ ----- -------- -------- -- Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0.00 • 0.00 • 0.00 • •
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -:, -- - - - - - --- -...J - - -- -- - - - -..J --- - - - - - --.. - - - -·---- - - - - - - - --- - - -• - --- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - Par1<ing Lot • 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00 : : ............ ~ ...................... _ ....... -:-------------, -----------. -----------: ---------------------: ----------------------- Unrefngeraled Warehouse-No Rail 553.95 553.95 553.95 : 4,550,823 : 4,550,823 Total I 572.95 I 572.95 I 572.95 I 4,637,674 I 4,687,674

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip%
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary ..........................

General Office Building 24.20 , 24.20 , 24.20 33.00 , 48.00 , 19.00 77 Other Asphatt Surfaces : 16.60 : 8.40 : 6.90 : 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00 : O ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ~ ------ - --I----- - ---1---- - --- ---- - --- --~ - - --- ---I - - --- ----_..,_ -- ------- Par1<ing Lot : 16.60 : 8.40 : 6.90 : 0.00 : 0.00 : 0.00 : O ·c~;;,~~~;._;j;.j w;;e·h·o·u·;;.;;o· r--2420 --T --2420--T--2420 --T--5900 --r--0-00 --i---41 00 --T----92----

4.4 Fleet Mix
Trip Purpose %
Diverted j
19 0
0 5
Pass-by
4 0
0 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-235

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page23of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south coast Air Basin, Winter Land Use LOA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.603018: 0.047037: 0.220506: 0.129439: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.000000: 0.00000 ---------------------------~------~-------L------J-------L------J-------L------J-------L------J-------L------ Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.552111: 0.043066: 0.201891: 0 118512: 0.0156os: 0.005863: 0 021387: 0.031253: 0.002087: 0.001818: 0.004803: 0 000708: 0.00089 ---------------------------~------J-------L------J-------L------J-------~------J-------L------J-------L------I I Parking Lot o.552111: o.043066: o.2018s1: 0.118512: o.015so5: 0.005863: 0.021387: 0.031253: 0.002081: 0.001818: 0.004803: 0.000108: 0.00089 -u.;-,~r~.,--,~t~cl w"a;eli~~.-;,~tio" -o~so301'i -o.o.i'103~ -o:22ososf-cl 1i94J9l-o~oooooof -ooo-ooool-o~oooooof -o.oo-ooool-o:Oooooof-000-00007-o:Oooooof -oooooooi 0.00000 Rail

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exnaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~ CO2 To4al CO2 Cl+! I N20 I C02e PM10 F'l,110 To4al Pl.t2.5 F'l,12.5 Total
Catego<y lp(day ll=,day
~ 0.0370 ' 0.3366 ' 0.2827 : 2.0200e-: ' 0.0256 ' 0.0256 : ' 0.0256 : 0.0256 : : 403.8978 : 403.8978: 7.7400e-: 7.4000e-: 406_298Q ' ' ' ' ' Mitigated
'
003
' ' ' ' ' 003 003
-----------0.0370 T-0~3366-r o:2si1 -r 2~;_-r-----r OJl256 -1-0.0256 -r-----T-0~0256-1-O~0256 -r-----r 403~8078-r «13:Siiis r i. ~cf 1-7~~ i 406.lW0 ~ Unmitigated
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-236

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

5.2 Energy by Land Use-~
Unmitigated
I~
land Use ~
General Office 1 190.137
Building
other Asphstt 0
Surfaces
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 P"110
ll>(day
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PT,12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-c02 I ~ c02I Total 002
ll>(clay
CH4 N20 C02e

2.Q500e. I 0.0186 I 0,Q\57 I 1,10Q0e-I I 1.4200,,-I 1.4200..-I ' 1.4200..-t 1.4200e-: I 22,3691 t 22,3691 t 4.300Qe.' 4.lQOOe-' 22.5020 ooa: : :004: :000:000: :ooa:ooa: : : :004:004:
______ J ______ L-----~------J ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ L ______ 1 _______ ~-----~------J ______ L ______ 1 _________ _ =:~:~:~: :=:~: :=:~: :=:~:~:=:=
PBlmg Lot :---0 --11--01'000-·:· -0.0000 -:--o~OOOO -:-0~0000-·:· ------:--0.0000 -:--o~C.000--:------:--0.0000 -:--0.0000 -t------;--o~OOOO-·:· -0.0000 -;--O.oooi -; 0.0000 1 0.0000
Unrefrigerated , 3242. 99
Wsrehouse-No 1
Rail
Total

I I I I I I I I I
- --,---~ --~ ---.-- -~ --~ - --,---~ --~ -- - 0.0350 t 0.3179 t 0.2671 I 1.Q1QOe-I I 0.0242 t 0.0242 t t 0,0242 t 0,0242 003

0.0370 0.3366 0.2827 2.0200e-0.0256 0.0256 0.0256 0.0256 003

I I I I
-----~ - --,---~ - -~ .
, 381.5288, 381.5288 , 7.31(l()e. , 6.gg()()e. , 383.7960 003 003
403.8978 403.8978 7.7400.-7.4000.-406.2980
003 003
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-237

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter

5.2 Energy by Land Use•~
Mitigated
~II ROG
5 Use
NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl.110 Pl.110
Pl.HO
Tolal
Fugitive Exhsusl
Pl.12.5 Pl.12.5
Pl.12.5
Total
s.o-c02 I ~ c021 Total 002 CH-4 N20 C02e
Land Use ~
General Office : 0.190137
Building
Other Asphalt : 0
Surfoces
Psmnglot 0
Unrefrigeratod , 3.242Q9
W,,re!,ou,.,-No
Rail
Total

6.0 Area Detail
ll>(day U>/day
205Q0e-I 00186 I 00157 I 110:X,e,-I I 1420()e... I 1420(k. I I 14200e-I 1420()e... I 223(191 I 22.3691 I 43000e-I 4100Qe-I 225020 .003 : . : . : '004 : : ·003 : .003 : : .003 : .003 : . : : ·004 : .004 : .

I I I I I I I l I I I I I
-01)000-·:· -0.0000 -:--o~OOOO--:-0~0000-·:· ------:· -0.0000 -:--o~OOOO-·: ------:· -O.ciocxi · :--0.0000 ------·:--o~OOOO-·:· -0.0000 -:· -0.0000 ·:--o~OCOO-: 0.0000 ------;------~------:------~------~-----~------~------~------:-------~-----~------~------~------:------I 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ! 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ ! 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 ~ I 0.0000 I 0.0000 : , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 -01)350-"' -0.31-1Q -, ·02671--•-1.Q100e: ~ ------r -0.0242 -•--o~02i£, ------' -0.0242 -:--0.0242 -------•-381.52s8 ~ -381~5288 ~ 7~1oo;.-:-8.~ ; 383.7960

0.0370 0.3366
003 003 003

0.2321 I 2.0200 ...
003
O.o256 0.0256 0,0256 0.0256 403.ss1s 1 403.ss1s I 1.1400e-1 1.4000 ... I 406.211so 003 003

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-238

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page26 of28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM Category
Mitigated
Unmitigoted
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution center -Passenger cars -south coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx co 502

13.9324 I 5.900'.)e.. I 0.0641 I Q.OQOO I
004 :
13_11324 1 5_9000e. 1 o.0641
004

0.0000
Fugitive I Exhaust
f't.110 f't.110
Pl,110
Tolal
l>(doy
I 2.300Qe-I 2.300Qe-I
004 : 004 :

2.3000... I 2.3000e-
004 004
Fugitive I Exhous
f't.12.5 PJ.12.5
PJ.12.5
Total s.o-c02 I ~ co21 Tc<o1 co2 CH4
IP(doy
: 23000e-: 2.3000e-I 0.1373 : 0.1373 : 3.6000e-:
,0041004: I I .0041
- ---- -:- ------i -- --- -~--- - - -, -- ----~ - -----:- - -- -- 2.3000e- 004
2-:lOOOo>-
004

0.1373 0.1373 3.8000e-
004
N20 C02e
, 0.14e3

0.14e3

6.2 Area by ~
Unmitigated
~
Architecturel
Coating
Con.sumer
Producis
Landscaping
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PMI0
u,{day
PM10
Total
Fug~ive I Exhaust
PM2-5 PM2..5
PM2.5
Total
Bi<>-C02 1~co21 TotalC02
ll>(day
CH4 N20 C02e
1,6120 : : 0.0000 : o.ocoo : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : I : 0.0000 : 1 0.0000 I ' I I I I I I I • I I I I I
-~----L ______ , ______ J ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ L ______ L _____ J _______ ~------------L------L _____ J ______ I I

12.3145 : '
1 1
: 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : I : 0.0000 :
1 1

0.0000
I • I I I I ' • I • I ' I I
------~------·------J------~------·------J------l------~-----~-------~------------1------~-----~------I I 5_0100e-: 5_0000@.. : o.0641 : 0.0000 : : 2_3000e. : 2_3000e-: : 23000e--: 2.3oooe-: I 0.1373 1 0_1373 : 3.eoooe-: 0.1463
003 004 004 004 004 004 : I 004

13.9324 I 5,9000e-I o.0641
004

0.0000 2-3-000e-I 2.3-000e-
004 004

2.3000•-1 2.3000e-
004 004

0.1373 0.1373 3.6000•-
004

0.1463
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-239

w!Jl;fMOO. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3-2 Page27of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM

6.2 Area by~
Mitigated
ROG NOx
~
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter co S02 Fugitive Exhaust
Pt.110 PM10
~day
PMIO
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Totol
Bio-CO2 I~ 0021 Total 0021 CH4
ll>ldoy
N20

1.6120 :
1 1 1
: 0.0000 : 0.0000 : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : I : 0.0000 :
1 1
C02e

0.0000 Architectural
Costing
Consumer
Products
------~------:------~------~------:------~------~------~-----~-------~-----J------~------~-----~------: I

12.3145 , 1 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 : I 1 0.0000 1 , , 0.0000 ------·-----~------·------·------~-----·------·------·-----·-------~-----J------·------·-----·------ Landscaping 5.0700e-, 5.0000e-1 0.0641 1 0.0CX)Q 1 1 2.3000e-1 2.3000e-1 , 2.3000e-, 2.3000e-: I 0.1373 1 0.1373 1 3.6000e-1 , 0.1463 003 004 004 004 004 004 : 004
Total 13.9324 1 5.9000e-1 0.0641
004

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Equipment Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment

0.0000
Number
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators

2.3000e-I 2.JOOOe-
004 004

2.3000e-I 2.3000e-
004 004

0.1373 o.1313 I 3.6:so.-
Hours/Day OaysNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

0.1463
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-240

~ Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page28of 28 Date: 7/20/2021 3:11 PM ~ 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Passenger Cars -South Coast Air Basin, Winter Equipmenl Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Faclor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-241

~Version: calEEMod2016.3.2 Page 1 of 34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
l
General Office Building
--------------· Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
--------------·
Other Asphalt Surfaces
·-------
Parlcing lot

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban
Climate Zone 10
Utility Company Riverside Public Utiltties
CO2 Intensity 1325.65
(UI/MlcY.PH
Size

20.00 583.10

16.00 8.18
Wind Speed (m/sJ
CH4 Intensity
(UI/MlcY.PH

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
south Coast Air Basin, Annual
l
Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population
1000sqft , 0.46 , 20,000.00 , 0
--------------------------4------------~----------------'----------I 1000sqft 15.54 583,100.00 0 --------------------------L------------~-----------------~----------< Acre ' 16.00 ' 696,960.00 0
-----------A~~e------------f-----i. 1-8-----1----3ss,:iio~so -----[ 0

2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31
Operational Year 2022

0.029 N2O Intensity 0.006
{UI/MlcY.PH
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-242

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2of 34
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics -See SWAPE comment regarding CO2, CH4, and N2O intensity factors.

Land Use -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM
Construction Phase -Total construction length consistent with information provided in the DEIR. but phase lengths are ~altered.

Trips and VMT -See SWAPE comment regarding vendor and worl<er trip numbers.

Grading -
Architectural Coaling -See SWAPE comment regarding architectural coating emission factors.

Vehicle Trips -Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -See SWAPE comment regarding indoor water use rate.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -see SWAPE comment regarding the PM10 and PM2.5 % reductions.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation -See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Fleet Mix -See SWAPE comment regarding operational vehicle fleet mix. Only trucks. Passenger cars reduced to O; truck percentages proportionally altered based on ~defaults. See construction calculations.

Table Name ] Column Name ] Default Value ] New Value
~ ~ 30.00 18.00
1----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ ~ 75.00 46.00 ------------------------------------------------------------· ~ ~ 740.00 227.00
. . ' ~ =-----------~----------=-----------ss~o-----------:-------------1

17.00 . .
--------------------------,-------------------------~----------------------------------------◄ ~ ~ 55.00 17.00 . .
-------------------------->-------------------------~----------------------------------------◄ ~ HHD 0.03 0.42 --------------------------~-------------------------~----------------------------------------~ ~ ; HHD ; 0,03 0.42 . .
--------------------------~-------------------------~----------------------------------------~ ~ ; LDA ; 0.55 0.00 I
-- --- --- --- --- -. - --- - - - - - -: - --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - - -:- --- --- --- --- --- - - - - - - - - - - ~ : LOA : 0.55 0.00
~ : -----------i:-oi1 -----------: o.o4 0.00
1--------------------------~-------------------------~---------------------------.-------------t ~ LDT1 0.04 0.00
I-------- --------- ------- - --- --------- - ------- - -------- --- --------- - ---- - - - - ----:------------t -----~-----r -----LDT2 - - - - -t ------0.20 - - - - -i 1 ~ LDT2 0.20 0.00

0.00 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-243

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page3of 34 Date 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual ----------~--------_ _l _ ----------~~~1-- - - ------_ l _ ----------~.~2-- - - - --- ---I I ~ 1 LHD1 1 0.02 , 0.21

0.21 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----------1 ~ LHD2 5.8630e-003 0.08
·---------------------------------------------------------- ~ LHD2 5.8630e-003 0.08
--------------------------,-------------------------~--------------------------~------------~ ~ : MDV : 0.12 0.00
-------------------------->-------------------------~--------------------------~------------~ ~ MDV 0.12 0.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'------------1 ~ MHD 0.02 0.29
~~~~~~:~~~~:~~~~~~~~ ~~~~:~~~~:~~~~~~~~:~:~~~~ ~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~:~:~~~~~~ 0.29 I ~ ~ 13.39 15.54
-------------------------
~ CC_TL 8.40 38.70
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~------------~ ~ CC_TL 8.40 38.70
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~------------~ ~ CNW_TL 6.90 38.70
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------~------------~

38.70 ~ CNW_TL 6.90
~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~: ~~~~:~~~~:~~-~~~~~~~~~~:~ ~~~~~~~~:~~~1~~~~~~~~~~:~~-i 38.70 I ~ CW_TL 16.60 38.70
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------:--------------1 ~ ST_TR 2.46 0.45
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ~ ST_TR 1.68 0.45
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------r-------------1 ~ SU_TR 1.05 0.45
-------------------------->-------------------------~--------------------------,-------------1 ~ : SU_TR : 1.68 0.45
--------------------------~-------------------------J--------------------------~------------~ ~ WDTR 11.03
~ f WD:TR 1 1.68 j

0.45 0.45

2.0 Emissions Summary
~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-244

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
Year
2021
2022
Maximum
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
loos/vh
PI.IIO
Tojsi
Fugitive Exhaust
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5
Pl.!2.5
Total
Bi<>-C02 l~=I TolalC02
MT/lfh
a-« N20 C02e

0.5040 : 4.4881 : 4.0782 : 0.0130 : 0.Q888 : 0.1353 : 1.1241 : 0.3412 : 0.t250 : 0.4670 : 0.0000 I 1.1g4.4gs: 1,104.4~: 0.1277 : 0.0000 : 1.107.600 , , , , 1 1 1 1 , : I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-3.23,6 -~ -2.1-,06 -:-2~2083-~ -s~ 1'oooe--"' :-0.4525 -:-·o~Q4.85-~ -0.5010 -~ -ci. ;22o -:-·0~0455-~ --0~1675-~-·o~OOOO--, -147.51·35: 741~5735·:-·o~o58tJ-~ -O.OOX,-: 749.0453 I 003 , I

3.2316 4.A881 4.0782 0.0130 0.9888 0.1353 1.1241 0.3412 0.1259 0.4670 0.0000 11,19u9311,194.AS8 I 0.1211 1 1

0.0000 I 1,191.600
1 Mitigated Construction
Yur
2021
2022
Maximum
Pen:ent
Reduction
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pl.!10 Pt.110
tooslvh
Pl.110
Tojsi
Fugiove Exhaust
Pt.12.5 Pt.12.5
1'1.12.5
Total
Bi<>-C02 a-« N20 C02e
MT/lfh
0,5040 : 4,4881 : 4,0782 : 0,0130 : 0.9888 : 0.1353 : 1,1241 : 0.3412 : 0.1259 : 0.4670 : 0.0000 ; '1.194.497: 1,1~.497: 0.1277 : 0,0C()O : 1,197.689 I I I I I I I I I : 7 I 7 I I I 8
------:-------:-------: ------:-------:-------: ------:-------:-------: --------:-------1------:-------:-------: -------:----1

3.2316 , 2.1106 , 2.2983 , 8.1~ , 0.4525 , 0.0485 , 0.5010 , 0.1220 , 0.0456 , 0.1675 : 0.0000 I 747.5733, 747.5733 , 0.0589 , 0.0000 , 749.0451

3.2316 4.4881 4.0782
ROG NOx co

0.00 0.00 0.00
003 :

0.0130 0.9888 0.1353 1.1241 0.3412 0.1259 0.4670 0.0000 I 1,194.49711,194.497 I 0.1277 7 7
S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-C02 Total CO2 CH4 PM10 ™10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.0000 I 1,197.GSS
8 N20 CO2•

0.00 0.00
~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-245

~l;f;ll/lR:(J.. Version_ GalEEMocl2016.3.2 Page5of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Quarter SQrtOat. End 0..te Maximum Unmiti9"ted ROG + NOX (tonsl-rtff) lbximl.rn Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/qu..rter) 1 4-1-2021 6-30-2021 1.51l10 1.51l10
2 7-1-2021 9-30-2021 1.6707 1.6707
3 10-1-2021 12-31-2021 1.6858 1.6858
4 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 1.5280 1.5280
5 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 3.7137 3.7137
Highest 3.7137 3.7137

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Catego,y
Ares
EnOfl)y
Mobile
Waste
Weier
ToQI
ROG NOx co S02 Fug~ive Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
tonslV,t.

PMI0
Total
Fug~ive I Exhaust
PM25 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-C02 lt,l;lip;-C021 ToCalC02
MT~
CH4 N20 C02e
2_!>-4,.23 I 7.0QOOe-I 8.0200e-I 0.0000 I I 3.QOOOe-I 3.0000e-I I J.OOOOe-I 3.000IJe-: 0.0000 1 0.0156 I 0.0156 I 4.0000e-I 0.0000 I 0.0166
:oos:003: : :oos:oos: :oos:005: 1 : :oos: : ______ L _____ J ______ J ______ L ______ 1 ______ J ______ L------L-----J-------~-----i------L ______ L _____ J ______ 0 I 6,7: : 0.0614 : 0.0516 : 3.7~ : : 4.6~~-: 4.~~ : : 4.~~ : 4,6:-: 0.0000 I 1,08!.813: 1.os:.813: 0.0235 : 5.~ : 1.~.138 I I I I I I I I I : I I I I
______ L _____ J ______ J ______ L ______ t ______ J ______ L ______ L _____ J _______ ~-----~------l------L-----J----------

0.44Q9 : 10,egn : 3.8328 : o.0458 : 1.57S4 : o.0437 : 1.e222 : 0.4512 : o.0418 : 0.4930 : 0.0000 1 4,429.392: 4,429.392 : o.213~ : 0.0000 : 4,434.727 I I I t I I I I I : 5 I 5 I I I 0
------~-----~------~------~------:------~------}------~-----~-------~-----J------}------~-----~------~ I : : : : : 0.0000 : 0.0CX)O : : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 115.0370 I 0.0000 : 115.0370: 6.7085 : 0.0000 : 284.99Q3 ------~ -- ----:------~ ------~ ------:------~ ------~ --- ---~ ---- -~ -------~ -----J ------~ ------~ -- ---~ ----- -: I 1 , 1 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0CX)O 1 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 • 43.0CX,8 I 1,098.1421 1,142.04Q 1 4.5337 1 0.1115 , 1,288.604 29990 10_1592 I 3.8925 0.0462 1.5784 0.0484 1.6269 0.4512 0.0465 0.49n : 7 I 5 I 4
• I I I
158.9439 I 6,611.36416,770.307 I 11.5691
1 9

0.1173 I 7,094.485
9 ~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-246

~ Version: GalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 6 of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
CalegOl'f
Area
Enecgy
Mobile
Waste
We.~
Total
Percent
Reduction
ROG NOx co SO2 Fugrtive I Exhaust
Pt.110 PMI0
ton~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-CO21~0021 TolalCC2
MT/ii,
CH4 N20 002e

2.5423 : 7.~e-: 8.0200e-: 0.OCOO : : 3.0000e-: 3.0000e--: : 3.0000e-: 3.0000e-: 0.0000 I 0.0156 : 0.0156 : 4.0000e-: 0.0000 : 0.0166 005 003 , 005 005 005 005 : I 005

6.760Qe. :--(10014 -:--o~51_6_ -:-i1~-:-------:-4.61"ooe: -:-4~67~ ·:· --- ---:-4.6i~ -:-4.e7"ooe: -:--o~ocoo-1-1J)Si813 :· 1,Q83i;3 :--0~0235--:-5~3300e: -:~ ooo: : :004: :003:003: :003:000• I 4: 4: :003: 5
-0.449Q -~ -10.6977 -:-ifs32s -~ -0.0458 -~ -1~5184 -:--0~0431-i -1.e~2 -; -0.4512 -i -o~o41s-~--0~4Q3{)--: -0~0000-14~429.3Q2: 4.4~~392-i -0~2134-~-0.0000-~ 1 , 1 1 , , 1 , , • I 5 , 5 1 , 1 o
I I l I I I I I I : I I I I
------~ ------:------~ ------~ ------:--o~OOOO-~ -0.0000 -; ------~ -o:0000 ~ --o~OOOO--:-115.0310 1 -0.0000 -: 115~0370-~ -e:1-985-~-0.0000-~, _28_4 _____ 3-i I I I ' I I ' I : I
------~ ------:------~ ------~ ------:--o~OOOO-~ -0.0000 -~ ------~ -o~OOOO-~ --o~OOOO--: 43.DCXSS 1-1M ,-42 ~ 1.14-2~04Q ~ -4~5-337-~ -0.11,5 -• 1.2SS.504

2.9990
ROG

0.00 1 , 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 • I 7
1 5
1 1 1
4 10.1592 I 3.s925 0.0462
NOx co

0.00 0.00

1.5784 0.0484 1.6269 0.4512 0.0465 0.4977 15s.S439 I 6,611.36416,110_301 I 11.5691 1 9
502 Fugitive Exhaus1 PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Totll CO2 CH4 PM10 PM10 TOlal Plll2.5 PM2.5 Totll

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.1113 11,094.As5
9 N20 C02e

0.00 0.00

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
~
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-247

~ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Encl Date Num Days I Num Days Week
: Stte Preparation : Stte Preparation : 4/1/2021 : 4/26/2021 , 5: 1s:

Phase Description
2 -----i G~,;-ding ----------------~ G~adl;,g ---------------:4'2712021-----: 6-,ig/i-021 ----: ------s: -----46! I ------,------------------------------------------'-----------~----------1-------~-------~-------------~- 3 : Building Construction : Building Construction : 6/30/2021 : 5112/2022 ' s: 221:
■ ■ I I I I ':---------------t
4 : Paving : Paving : 5/13/2022 : 616/2022 : 5: 11:
• ■ I I
------~---------------------•-------------------~-----------r---------- 5 : Architectural Coating : Archrtectural Coating
Acres of Grading {Site Preparation Phase): O
Acres of Grading {Grading Phase): 115
Acres of Paving: 24.18
6ll/2022 6129/2022 SI 17
Residential Indoor: O; Residential Outdoor: O; Non-Residential Indoor: 904,650; Non-Residential Outdoor: 301,550; Striped Parking Area:
63,197 (Architectural Coating -~
OffR,Oag Equipment
~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-248

.wll~MQ,;J.. Version: Gal EEMod.2016.3.2 Page Bof 34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -south Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name T ~Equipment Type T Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor sne Preparation Rubber Tired Oozers 3: 8.00: 247: 0.4(
-----------------------------------------------~---------------•-----------~-----------~------~ Sile Preparation Tractors/loaders/Backhoes , 4: 8.00: 97: 0.3 ------------------------_______________________ J _______________ , ___________ J ___________ ~------~ Grading Excavators ' 2: 8.00: 1 ss: 0.31
I I I I, ______ _
Grading Graders : 1: 8.00: 187: 0.4

I I I I
-,---------1
Grading Rubber Tired Oozers : 1: 8.00: 247: 0.41
G~adin9-------------------S~r~p;~ -----------------1--------------2:---------s~Oo~ ---------3611 0.4l G~adln9-------------------T~a~to~o~d;~,a;~kt,~;$---- --"f --- ---------- -2r--------s~oo:----------91: 0.3 Building Construction Cranes : 1: 7.00: 231: 0.2!
-----------------------------------------------~---------------·-----------~-----------~------~ Building Construction Forklifts , 3: 8 oo: 89: 0.21
-----------------------------------------------~---------------•-----------~-----------~------~ Building Construction Generalor Sets : 1: 8.00: 84: 0.7 -----------------------------------------------~---------------·-----------~-----------~--------1 Building Construction Tractors/loaders/Backhoes ' 3: 7.oo: 97: 0.3 ■ I I I 1:-------
Building Construction ": Welders : 1: 8.00: 46: 0.4
■ I I I -i'--------1
Paving :Pave.ra : 2: 8.00: 130:
~~~n_9 ____________________ j~~~~~ ~~u~p-~e~~ ___________ } ______________ ~!-________ s~~o} _________ ~~2"'i ______ o ___ 3~1 Paving :Rollers 2• 8.00, so, 0.31
,.;ci.~e~iu;ai c~~ti-;,;;-----------\r ~;;,-;,;.;;o~;------------t--------------;j---------s~oot----------7sj 0.41

0.4 Trips and VMT
Phase Name ~Equipment
Count
Worxer Trip
Number
Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip
Number Number
WorxerTrip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauing Trip
Length
Worxer Vehicle
Class
Vendor I Hauling
Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
I Site Preparation ,: 1s.oo: o.oo: o.oo: 14.10: 6.90: 20.00:~ :~ :HHOT ___ • • _ • _ • • _ • • •., _ • _ • • • • _ • • • • 1. • • • • • _ • • I • _ • • _ • • • •'-• _ • • • • _ 1. • • _ • _ • • • 1 _ • •_•••••I _ ••••_••I • _ • • • • _ • • • • I Grading • a: 20.00: o.oo: o.oo: 14.10: 6.so: 20.00: ~ : ~ : HHDT

I I I I I I I I
9: 694.00: 271.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: ~ : ~ : HHDT ______________ .:::::::::::: ~:::::: ~s~~o}:::::: ~-~~::::::: ~-~~:::::: ~~-~oJ: : : : : : ~~9~[:::: :2~~0~[ ~:::::: J ~::: ,..! H_H_D_T----11 Bu.ildi.ng Construction
I Paving
I Architectural Coating 139.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.001~ ~ HHDT ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-249

~ version: GalEEMO<l.2016.3.2 Page 9of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive Oust
Off.R09d
Tobi
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 P!.110
tonsiv;t.

Pl,HO
Tolal
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
' 0.162e ' 0.0000 ' 0;1626 ' 0.0894 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0894
I I I I I !

I I I I I I I I
------•------J------L------~-----J------~------~------1------~------ Q_Q350 1 0.3645 ' 0.1004 1 3.4000e-1 0.0184 1 0.0184 1 1 o.01eg 1 0.016:V 004 ' '

0.0350 0.3645 0.1904 I 3.4oooe-I 0.1626
004

0.0184 0.1810 0.0894 0.0169 0.1063
Bio-CO2 I blEli/;t-CO2 I T olal CO2 CH4 N20 C02e
MT/y.r..

0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000
I I l I I

I I I I
'------L------L-----J------~------~----1 1

0.0000 I 3Q_()Q22 I 3QJlQ.22 I g_ 7300e-I 0.0000 I J0.335:5 . . l CX)J I .

0.0000 I 30.0922 I 30.0922 I 9. 1300e-I 0.0000 I 30.3355 003
~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-250

wJ!~MR:!k Version: GalEEMod.2016.3 2 Page 10of34 Date: 7120/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hsuli"Q
Vendor
Worker
Total
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMIO Pl,110
toru.'I\<_
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhausl
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-co2 I~ co2 I Total co2 I CH4 N20 C02e
MTJ\lr-

0.0QOO I 0,0000 I Q,0000 I 0.0000 I Q.QOOO I 0.0000 I Q,0000 I 0.0QOO I Q.OQOO I 0.0000 ; 0.0000 I Q.OQOO I 0,0000 • Q.0000 I 0,0000 I 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
_____ -1-_____ .... ______ .. _____ -I-______ , ______ ... ______ ... _____ -1-_____ ... ______ 1 ______ .. ______ ... _____ -•-_____ ... _ _ _ _ _ _ I

0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 : 0.0000 ' 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 I l I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
----•-'••••--~------J•-•••-~---•••'•••••-J•-----L------1 ...... J •••••• ~------J •.•.•. L ...... , ...... J _________ _

6.7:-I 5.~ I 5.~ I 2.~@-: t_]~~-I 1.~@-: ·1_7~~-I 4.7: : 1.~ I 4.~ : Q_OO()Q I 1.54Q8 I 1.54Q8 I 4.~-I Q.OQOO I 1.5508

6.7000e-I 5.0000e-5.6500•-I 2.0000e-
1 1.7800e-
1 1.0000•-i 1.7900e-I 4.7000•-i 1.0000•-i 4.8000e-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0.0000 1.5498 uo198 1 .s.0000e. 1 0.0000
~

1.5508
Mitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive Oust
Off-Road
Tot.I
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
ton*
PMIO
To<al
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio-co2 I ~ 002 I Toi.al co2 CH4 N20 C02e
MTty,,.
: 0.1626 : 0.0000 : 0.1626 : 0.08~ : 0.0000 : 0.0804 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
------1------~------~------~-----J------~------~-----~------~------------~------~-----J------~------~---

0.0350 : 0.3645 : 0.1904 : 3.~e-0.0184 ' 0.0184 ' 0.016Q 0.011JQ 0.0000 30.0!l21 30.0!l2I 9.~-: 0.0000 ' 30.3354

0.0350 0.3645 0.1904 1 3.o1000 ... 1 0.1626
004

0.0184 0.1810 0.0894 0.0169 0.1063 0.0000 30.0921 I 30.0921 I 9_1300e. I 0.0000 003

30.3354
~I
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-251

~™ Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucl<s -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
HatJling
Vendor
Wa1<er
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exnaust

PMIO PMIO
tons.'r,t.

PM10
Total
F~ I Exhaust
PM2_5 PM25
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 1 ~ CO2 I Total CO2
Milli;<.

CH4 N20 C02e
=:=:=:-:=:-:=:-:=:=;=:=:-:=:-:-
• I I I I I
------'------~------i ______ L ______ , ______ i ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ ~------i------L------•------J------~--- Q.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ______ , ______ 1 ______ I ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ -=-_____ I ______ I ______ 1 ______ I ______ ~---t

6.]QOOe. : 5.0QQOe-I 5.6500e-I 2.000Qe-: 1.7800e-I 1.000Qe-: 1.]QOOe... I 4.]0QOe-: 1.0QOOe-I 4.8000e-■ 0.0000 I 1.5408 I 1.54gs I 4.0000e-: 0.0000 : 1.5508 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005

6.TOOOe-1 5.0000e-1 5.6500•-1 2.ooooe-I 1.rs00e-11.ooooe-I 1.1s00e-I ,.10000-11.ooooe-I ,.soooe- 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004

0.0000 1.5498 1.5498 I <1.0000.-I 0.0000
005

1.5508

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Fugitive0~
Off-Road
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PM10 PMIO
lonsill;<.

PM10
Toial
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
P~l2.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I WiA-C02J ToialC02 CH4 N2O C02e
MT/w,;.
: 0.1005 : 0.0000 : 0.1Ql)5 : 0.082] : 0.0000 : 0,0827 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 I 0,0000 I I I I I I : I I I I
------:------~------~------~-----~------!------~------:------!------~------~------~-----~------!-----I O.Oll64 , 1.0672 , 0.7102 , 1.4300e-, 0.0457 , 0_0457 , , 0.0420 , 0.0420 0.0000 , 125.3385, 125.3385, 0.0405 , 0.0000 126.3519

0.0964 1.0672
003

0.1102 I 1.,Jooe-
003

0.1995 0.0457 0.2452 0.0827 0.0420 0.1247 0.0000 I 125.3385 I 125..3385 I o.0405 0.0000 I 126.351s ~, ~,
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-252

~l;f;~Q(J.. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.3 Grading -2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
Woncer
Tota.I
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PM10
ton~
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhau•1
PM2-5 PM2-5
PM2.5
Total
B<o-C02 I~= I Total co2 I CH4 N20
MT/vk

0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I Q,0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q.0000 I 0.0000 I C02e

0.0000
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I ______ , ______ J ______ .l-____ -L ______ , ______ .L ______ L ______ , ______ J ______ -•-_____ J. ______ L-_____ 1 ______ J ______ L--------....,1 =:=:=:=:~:=:=:=:=:=~~:=:=:~:=:

I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I
_1 ______ I ______ I ______ I ______ , ______ I ______ I ______ , ______ I ______ •------l ______ I ______ 1 ______ I _____ _ UUOOe-: 1.4200e-: 0.0161 : 5.0000e-: 5.0500e-: 4.0000e-: 5.0800e-: 1.3400e-: 4.0000e-: \.3800e-• 0.0000 : 4.4006 : 4.4006 : 1.200:)e-: 0.0000 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004

1.s100e-11.4200e-I 0.0161
003 003

5.0000e-1 5.0500e-I 4.0000e-1 5.0800E!-I 1.3400e-1 4.0000e-I 1.3800e- 005 003 005 003 003 005 003

0.0000 4A006 4.4006 I 1.2000e. I 0.0000
004

0.0000

4.4036

4.4036
Mitigated Construction on-Site
Category
FugffiveDusf
OffCRosd
Total
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
Pt.110 Pt.110
tons.,\I,.

PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 Pt.12.5
PM2.5
Total
1 0.1Q95 0.0000 : 0.1GQ5 : 0.0827 : Q_(X)OO : 0.0827
I I I I l I I l

0.0064 : 1.0672 : 0.7102 : 1.4300e--: 0.0457 : 0.0457 : : 0.0420 : 0.0420 003

0.0964 1.0672 0.1102 I 1.~~ I 0.1995 0.0457 0.2452 0.0827 0.0420 0.1247 9;.,. CO2 I llllliA-CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4 N20 C02e
~IT-',\<.

0.0000 : o.ooco : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000

I I I I I
-- --- --:--- ----:--- ----:-- -----:---- ---:----1

0.0000 I 125.3383 I 125.3383 I 0.0405 I 0.0000 I 126.3517

0.0000 I 125.3383 I 125.3383 I o.0405 0.0000 I 12s.3511 ~, ~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-253

~ version: caIEEMoc1.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 34 Date: 712012021 3:32 PM

3.3 Grading -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMI0 PMI0
t~
PMI0
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
P~-12_5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 I Olilio.-CO2 I Total CO2 I CH4
MT/v,<.

N20
Hauling 0.0000 I Q.QOOO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.QCOO I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I Q,OOOQ I Q.QQOO I 0.0000 I C02e

0.0000
• _ • _ • _1 __ • • • • _, • • • • • • .1, • • • • • • ·-• • • • • _,_ • • • • • ·'· • • • • • • ·-• • • • • _, • _ • • • • _1 • • • • • • -=-• • • • • .! • • • • • • ·-• • • • • _,_ • • • • • _I • • • • • • '----1

0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : OJ)OOO : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 : Vendor Wooer
Total
I I I I t I I I I • I I I I
I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
· - -~ - - -,- - -~ - -~ - --i-- -r - -~ - --,-- -T - --:------r - -~ - - -,- - -T - -~ 1.Q,1()Qe-I 1.4200@-I 0.0161 I 5.0000@-I 5.0500@-I 4.00C()e-I 5.()800@. I 1.3400@-I 4.00C()e-I 1.3800@-• 0.QOOO I 4.4006 I 4.4006 I 1.2000@-I Q.OQOO = ~ = ~ = = ~ = ~= ' ~

1.s100e-11_4200 ... I 0.0161
003 003

5.oooo ...
1 5.0500•-I 4.0000 ...
1 5.0800e-
1 1.3400e-I ,.0000... 1.3800 ...
005 003 005 003 003 005 003

0.0000 4A006 4.4006 1 1.2000e-1 0.0000
004

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exlniust P~IIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~CO2 TolalC02 Cl-l4 I N20 I F't.110 F't.110 Tog! PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category tons/v,<. LIT/\\<.

0.0000

4.4036

4.4036
=·
Off.Road 0.1264 ' 1.15112 ' 1.1023 I 1.]QOOe.. : ' 0.0!!38 ' OJ)638 1 ' 0.05QQ ' 0_05gg Q.0000 I 154.0388 : 154.0388 : o.o3n ' 0.0000 ' 154_ge7g =
Total 0.1264 1.1592 1.1023 1.7900e-0.0638 0.0638 0.059S 0.059S 0.0000 154.0388 154.0388 0.0372 0.0000 154.9679 003
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-254

~ Version: GalEEMocl.2016.3.2 Page 14of34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction • 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Category
S02 Fugitive I Exhaust
PMIO Pt.110
Ions.~
PM10
Total
F ugiti\/e I Exhausl
PM2.5 PM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-C021~0021 Total CO2! CH4 N20 CO2'!
MTJ\11.

Heuli,-g 0.000Q I 0.0000 I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I 0.0C(')Q I 0.0000 I 0.000Q I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.QOOO I 0.0000 I Q.OQOO I 0.QOOQ I Q,OCIOQ I 0.0000 Vendor
Worker
Total
------:-------: ------.;. ------:-------:------.;. ------:-------:-------: -------=-------:-------:-------:-------: ------:-----1 0.0518 , 1.7530 , 0.4430 , 4.5100e--, 0.1136 , 3.5700..., 0.1171 , 0.0328 , 3.4100... , 0.0362 : 0.0000 , 437.5739, 437.5739, 0.0282 , 0.0000 , 438.2791 ' ' ""T - --,-

0.1918 , 0.1424 , 1.6108
003 003 003
' ' T" - -~ 4.8800~ I
003

I I I I I
-,- - -T" - --, - - -,-- -T 0.5063 , 3.8200... , 0.5102 , 0.1345 , 3.5200e- 003 003

0.2436 1.8953 2.0537 I 9.3900e-I 0.6199 I 7.3900e-I 0.6273 003 003 0.1612 1 s.~~•-
-=------~ - -~ - --:-- -~ 0.1380 ~ 0.0000 , 441.5045, 441.5045, 0.0119 0.0000 ; 441.8015

0.1742 0.0000 I 879.0183 I 879.0113 I o.0401 0.0000 I 880.0806 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx co S02 Fugitive Exhausl PM10 Fugitive Exheust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 ~CO2 T0011C02 CH4 I N20 I C02e Pt.110 Pt.110 Total PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category 1onsJ\II. MTf¥,.

Off.Road 0.1264 ' 1.1592 1.1023 1.7QOOe. I
' 0.0638 0.0638 0.0599 , 0.0599 0.0000 154.0388 , 154.0388, o.o3n 0.0000 154.0077 003
Total 0.1264 1.1592 1.1023 1.7900.-0.0638 0.0638 0.0599 0.0599 0.0000 154.0386 154.0386 0.0372 0.0000 154.9677 003
~,
City of Riverside Section 2.0
Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR Responses to Comments

2.0-255

Qijll;fMQQ.. Version: GalEEMod.2016.3-2 Page 15 of 34 Date: 7/20/2021 3:32 PM 9309 Sycamore Hills Distribution Center -Trucks -South Coast Air Basin, Annual

3.4 Building Construction -2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Category
Hauling
Vendor
W"'1<er
Totll
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive I ExhatJst
PM10 PM10
tons.I\\<,
PM10
Total
Fugitive I Exhaust
PM2.5 FM2.5
Pt.12.5
Total
Bio-CO2 1 ~ CO2 I Total 002
MTJ\p;.

CH4 N20 002e

0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0,0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0,0000 , 0,0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0,0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0,0000 I I I I I I I I I ■ I I I I I
------~-----,------,------r------,------,------r-----~------,-------------,------r------,------,------, 0.0518 , 1.7530 , 0.4430 , 4.5100e-, 0.1136 , 3.5700e-, 0.1171 , O.OJ.28 , 3.4100e-1 0.0362 : 0.0000 1 437_573g 1 437_573g, 0.0282 , 0.0000 1 438..27Q•t 003 003 003
.,.. - --. 0.1918 , 0.1424 , 1.6106 , 4.8800e-, 0.5063
003
' 3.8200e-:-0.5102-; 0.1345 ;3_5200";.-;-0,1380-=-0~0000-:-441.5045-; 441~5 ;-0.0119 ' 0.0000 ' 441.8015 0-2436 1-8953
003 003 •

2.0~7 I 9.3900e-I 0.6199 I 7.3900e-I 0.6273
003 003

0.1612 I 6.93ooe­
oo3

0.1742 0.0000 I 879.0183 I 879.0183 I o.0401 0.0000 I 880.0806

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction on-Site
ROG NOx co 502 Fugitive Exh.aust PMIO Fugitive E>Nust PM2.5 Bio-002 l:AliA-CO2 T clal 002 CH4 I N20 I C02e Pt.HO Pt.110 ToW PM2.5 Pt.12.5 Total
Category ton~ MT/i,;
Off-Road 0.0802 ' 0.7339 ' 0.76111 I 1.2]0()e-I
' 0.0380 '
Q_0380 I
'
Q_0358 I 0.0358 Q.0000 I 108.0100 I 108.Q100 I 0.0261 '

0.0000 , 109.5632
003
Totll 0.0802 0.7339 0.7691 1.2700e-0.0380 0.0380 0.0358 0.0358 0.0000 108.9109 108.9109 0.0261 0.0000 109.5632 003
~
Section 2 City of Riverside
Responses to Comments Sycamore Hills Distribution Center FEIR

2.0-256

3.4 Building Construction -2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co
Catogo,y