COUNCIUAGENCY
MEMBERS
CITY COUNCIL
AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2006, 3 P. M.
ART PICK COUNCIL CHAMBER
CITY HALL
OilRIVERSIDEMUNICIPAL AUDITORIUM
WARDS
B
T
o
1 M
L
N
A
R
E
Z
2 G
G
E
3 S
H
A
v
O
N
E
4 A
K
S
NN
5 H
R
T
6 A
A
S
7 Roll Call: Present X X X X X X X
CITY COUNCIL
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE AUDIENCE
There were no comments presented at this time.
PUBLIC HEARINGS/ PLANNING REFERRALS AND APPEALS
CASES P06- 0501, P06-0947, P06-0554, P06- 0556, P06- 0555, AND P06- 0557 - RIVERWALK - ORDINANCE INTRODUCED
Hearingwascalledonthe proposalby Griffin Industriesfor amendmentto the La Sierra UniversitySpecific Plan Subarea3 Land Use Regulationsand Development Standards, a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Parcel Map and review of a plot plan and building elevations to establish 264 market rate apartments, 200 age restricted senior apartments, and a 200 -unit congregate carefacilityonapproximately25.5 acresofvacantlandsituatednorthwesterly of Riverwalk Parkway, northeasterly of Sierra Vista Avenue, and southeasterlyof Pierce Street in the RA -ResidentialAgriculturalZone. No one was present wishing to speak on the matter. One letter was presented and considered. Following discussion, the public hearing was officially closed. TheCityCouncil (1) determinedthe proposedprojectwill not havea significant effect on the environment based upon the findings and mitigation measures set forth in the case record and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration; ( 2) approved Cases P06- 0501, P06-0947, P06-0554, P06- 0556, P06- 0555, and P06-0557 based on and subject to the Planning Commission' s findings and recommended conditions found in the written staff report, and amended Condition No. 2 to include an operations plan to be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Division to justify the 5 parkingspace/unit ratio and ConditionNo. 11(c) to read, "An increasein the depth of patios and balconies to 6 feet and increase the size of market rate apartmentground floor patios without compensating landscapeor other common open space areas.'; ( 3) found there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources and the impacts of the project are found to be de minimis pursuant Motion X to Section 711. 4 of the Fish and Game Code; and ( 4) introduced the Second X appropriate rezoning ordinance. All Ayes
CASES PO4- 1334 AND PO4- 1555 - APPEAL - TRACT MAP 33126 - 1684 ORANGE
Discussion was held on the appeal by IW Consulting Engineers, Inc., on behalf of PB Income Fund, LLC, of the Planning Commission' s approval of 92- 134