From: Sramala, Alisa
To: Shimshock, Sherry; McDaniel, Randy
Cc: Maus, Jordan; Smay, Sheryn; Campbell, Sandra; Galera, Pamela; Watson, Scott Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:44:45 PM
Attachments: image003.png
image004.png
Hi Sherry,
The protective easement Randy mentioned is from a Land and Water Conservation Fund grant requirement, so it’s not related to the historic status of the park. As part of acceptance of a grant back in the 1990’s, the City was required to record a deed restriction on the title to the property, based on SECTION 6(f)(3) of Public Law 88-578 which states:
“No property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the National Secretary of the Interior, be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve such conversion only if he finds it to be in accord with the then existing comprehensive statewide outdoor recreation plan and only upon such conditions as he deems necessary to assure the substitution of other recreation properties of at least equal fair market value and of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location.”
I’ll see if I can find a copy of the deed.
Sincerely,
Alisa Sramala
City of Riverside
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Department, Planning and Design Division Main: (951) 826-2000
Direct: (951) 826-2021
RiversideCA.gov
From: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:19 PM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Cc: Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Campbell, Sandra <[email protected]>; Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Importance: High
Randy,
Do these same restrictions apply if it is found not to be part of the historic landmark?
Sherry Shimshock
Senior Project Manager
Community & Economic Development
City of Riverside
Office: (951) 826-2433
Cell: (951) 941-3364
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Cc: Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Campbell, Sandra <[email protected]>; Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi Sherry,
Yes my calendar is up to date. Also, we received additional information from the State to clarify what is under the recreational protective easement at Fairmount Park.. See attached map and faint red line that shows the protection easement. You will note that the Golf Course is protected from being developed with anything other than public recreation. Alisa, is working to find out more and see how much flexibility we have in modifying the golf course area. We were told by the state, today, that they wouldn’t approve housing or any other use than recreation.
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 2:54 PM
To: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>; McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]>
Cc: Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Campbell, Sandra <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Thank you for this information on this important topic. I do want to be involved so please invite me to the meeting. thank you
Pamela Galera
City of Riverside
Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
Landscape Architect #3969
Main: 951.826.2000
RiversideCA.gov
From: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 2:39 PM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]> Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
HI Randy,
I recommend you, Scott and I meet and if Pamela has time, let’s include her too. The scope of what we are doing right now is not a development scope. It is strictly a community engagement charrette to talk about a variety of visions for what the golf course could become. That said, it is important to have an understanding of any limitations that the golf course may have on it in advance to make sure we are talking about implementable ideas. Is your calendar up to date? I’ll set up a 30 minute teams meeting.
Sherry Shimshock
Senior Project Manager
Community & Economic Development
City of Riverside
Office: (951) 826-2433
Cell: (951) 941-3364
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:27 PM
To: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]> Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
A meeting would be great. We could go over each of the restrictions listed below. Also, does your scope include CEQA scope of work? We typically include this for projects because grants require CEQA certification as a part of the application.
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:33 PM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Watson, Scott <[email protected]> Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
HI Randy,
Per my conversations with Scott Watson, (added to this email) in 2002 a cultural resources study found that the golf course portion was substantially altered and had no architectural or historical significance. My understanding is because of this we would go through a de-designation and mitigation process, like you mentioned, should the City decide to sell it for development. However, you said the real restrictions come with the funding used to purchase and improve it.
Regional Park fees have been utilized to make
improvements to the Park. Expenditure of Park fees is mitigation in itself. Therefore, it is not possible to just eliminate the mitigation without mitigating the portion of the golf course that would be impacted by other development; e.g. – other than regional public park services. My apologies, but I don’t know what this means. Maybe a phone call between you, me and Scott could clear up my lack of understanding?
I just don’t want to continue down this road with the RFP without understanding what restrictions may prevent a change of vision for the property.
Sherry Shimshock
Senior Project Manager
Community & Economic Development
City of Riverside
Office: (951) 826-2433
Cell: (951) 941-3364
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:09 PM
To: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]> Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
I listed the restriction to developing the golf course below. I attached the deeds, with no specific restrictions included, but the real restrictions come with the funding used to purchase and improve it. Also, the historical use, general plan designation and landmark status, etc. Detail below. Sheryn would have to do a title search to get more information, but I think the title search wouldn’t provide anything new or more strict than already listed.
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:49 AM
To: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]> Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi all,
Yes, I presented to the Economic Development Committee last Thursday regarding hiring a consultant to conduct a thorough community charrette process. One of the concerns brought up prior to the presentation was a statement by someone in the community that the golf course specifically (not the park) has restrictions on the deed that limit it to recreational uses only. Looking at the deed, we don’t see any such language. It is my understanding that a few years ago Parks & Rec and City Attorney’s Office did some research into this claim and it was determined that only the park has such use restrictions. Randy—does this sound familiar?
Sherry Shimshock
Senior Project Manager
Community & Economic Development
City of Riverside
Office: (951) 826-2433
Cell: (951) 941-3364
From: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:31 AM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Maybe. Nathan asked me to look into it this time for Planning.
Sheryn Smay, SR/WA
Supervising Real Property Agent
(951) 826-5343 Office
(951) 367-5788 Mobile
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:47 AM
To: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]>; Shimshock, Sherry <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi Sheryn,
The only request for the information below was from you. I think Sherry was working on this?
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:44 AM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Good morning,
Thank you for the information.
I am not sure, but I think this is for Planning. Planning is giving the CEDD update to the Chambers today and needed this information for the charette process.
Sheryn Smay, SR/WA
Supervising Real Property Agent
(951) 826-5343 Office
(951) 367-5788 Mobile
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2022 4:24 PM
To: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Cc: Galera, Pamela <[email protected]>; Sramala, Alisa <[email protected]>; Maus, Jordan <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi Sheryn,
The email below this one is pertaining to the undeveloped Habitat area at Fairmount park. I attached rpt, item 38 for your reference.
See below for a draft list of restrictions pertaining to the golf course:
1. It is park of Cultural Heritage Landmark #69. See attached designation of Fairmount Park as a landmark. Any changes would have to be reviewed and approved by the Cultural Heritage Board. The Golf course is part of the parks legacy and history, dating back to 1930 and also includes the Mission Inn ownership from 1945-1960. Impact to the Cultural resource would need to be mitigated according to the CEQA guidelines. Not sure what mitigation looks like if the proposal is to eliminate a historic landmark and somehow mitigate that impact?
2. Regional Park fees have been utilized to make improvements to the Park. Expenditure of Park fees is mitigation in itself. Therefore, it is not possible to just eliminate the mitigation without mitigating the portion of the golf course that would be impacted by other development; e.g. – other than regional public park services.
3. Council authorized the purchase in 1960, The funding source was funding from the budgeted park land acquisition account specifically for park & recreation purposes. See attached council Memorandum, interoffice communication, etc.
4. Grants? We do have record of a LWCF grant, but I asked Alisa to dig in and see if she can find out if there is a overlay protective easement.
5. General Plan- Fairmount park golf course is included as existing regional park in Recreation Element of the General plan. Taking of these acres for an alternative use would require replacement under CEQA
6. Park System Master Plan – The Golf Course is also included as regional park acreage calculation for park impact fees, with same restrictions as item 5 above.
7. Zoning is presently set at “o” which prohibits urban development.
Let me know if you have any questions. I’m not sure why this is still a discussion or up for debate. The items above seem to be fairly limiting on what can be done with the existing regional park land, aka – Fairmount Golf Course.
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 6:23 PM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi Randy,
I hope all is well.
I am assisting Planning in trying to find out more information about the Fairmount Golf Course. Planning is asking if there are any restrictions pertaining to the golf course regarding its use. I found this e-mail from 2020 when we were working on a response to the CalPERS Challenge. You may have provided this information already to Planning.
Below you mentioned something about a 2015 council action stating that Fairmount Park to be preserved as a public facility. Do you have a copy of that staff report or can you tell me what day to look for?
Sheryn Smay, SR/WA
Supervising Real Property Agent
City of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Department
Direct: (951) 826-5343
Mobile: (951) 367-5788
Fax: (951) 826-5701
[email protected]
RiversideCA.gov
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 8:48 AM
To: Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>; Welch, David <[email protected]> Cc: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; Min, Elliot <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Item 1 and 2 below pertain to the golf course. I haven’t done any research on the deeds, so don’t know the history on the land acquisition. In addition we have spent region park fees on the golf course.
Let me know if you need additional information.
Sincerely,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation & Community Services
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 8:24 AM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Welch, David <[email protected]> Cc: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; Min, Elliot <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Randy,
Does any of the information below include the golf course?
Kristi
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 6:32 PM
To: Welch, David <[email protected]>
Cc: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>; Min, Elliot <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi David,
As discussed I wanted to provide you with some background on Fairmount Park and current projects and grants that are in progress.
1. General Plan- Fairmount park undeveloped areas are identified as park in the existing Recreation Element of the General plan.
2. Park System Master Plan – The boyscout and spoils acreage at Fairmount park have been historically included in our regional park acreage calculation for park impact fees. See attached concepts from our 2003 park system mp (figure 4) and an update from 2020 mp (Lake Evans Wilderness Camp Exhibit).
3. Habitat Areas – The areas behind the dam including the boyscout property and spoils areas have substantial Army Corps, Fish, Regional Water Board, State Wildlife and Cultural restrictions. See attached preliminary design report.
4. Redevelopment Agency Transfer – See attached 2015 Council Action, recognizing these parcels as Fairmount park and preservation for continued use as a public facility.
5. Grants – Up to $6,000,000 in grant funding could be impacted if sold.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside, Deputy Director
Parks, Recreation & Community Services
Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Min, Elliot <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 10:04 AM
To: Welch, David <[email protected]>; McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]> Cc: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; Smith, Kristi <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Good morning David, Randy, and Sheryn,
The following from this list,
highlighted in green, are not qualified to be sold due to PPA and/or other restrictions:
1. Boy Scout Camp – park of Fairmount Park, formerly redevelopment agency.
2. Challen Park – It has a parking lot, but is mostly undeveloped. It is also designated as a regional park and has a lot of trails.
3. Golden Start Site – it was purchased with park impact fees and is currently leased to Toro – Since this land was purchased with park impact fees, the proceeds of any sale would be required to be used to pay back the park impact fees and any overage could then be used.
4. Hole Lake Site – Was received from the Friends of Riverside in exchange for the Agricultural Park – PPA restricts sale due to deed restrictions.
5. Loring – we recently have been awarded a grant from the CA Coastal Commission to do planning and design for this – also deeded for park purposes – PPA restricts sale due to deed restrictions.
6. Mission Ranch – Undeveloped local park
7. Mt. Vernon – Undeveloped Local Park
8. Mt Vernon Expansion – Open Space Purchased as a part of Box Springs. In the process of dedication of a conservation easement with RCA – Sale restricted by conservation easement.
9. Quail Run Site – Regional/ openspace Park Site
10. Tequesquite Sites – These parcels have been awarded a grant from the CCC for planning and design and are in MSHP cell zones.
11. Victoria-Cross Park – undeveloped local park
While the remainder on the list appear right now to be ok to sell, we will require all back-up documents related to the acquisition history of the land, including all City staff reports, prior deeds, etc. to ensure there are not other restrictions preventing sale. For example, for the Boy Scout Camp we would require the grant deed to the Redevelopment Agency, acquisition history into the RDA, all staff reports related to that acquisition, etc. It would also be helpful if this list could be narrowed to sites that are most viable/ valuable for sale.
Thank you, and please do not hesitate to contact me with questions.
Elliot H. Min
Deputy City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
(951) 826-5541 (Direct)
[email protected]
THIS EMAIL MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY IS INTENDED FOR THE OFFICIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENTS TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. THIS EMAIL CONTAINS MATERIAL THAT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR
PRIVILEGED UNDER THE WORK PRODUCT, ATTORNEY-CLIENT OR OFFICIAL INFORMATION PRIVILEGES FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. ANY REVIEW, RELIANCE OR DISTRIBUTION BY OTHERS OR FORWARDING WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
RECIPIENTS SHOULD NOT FILE COPIES OF THIS EMAIL WITH PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE WRITTEN OR ELECTRONIC RECORDS. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AND DELETE ALL COPIES.
From: Welch, David <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:53 PM
To: Min, Elliot <[email protected]>
Cc: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Elliot,
Please let us know which sites are part of the Park Preservation Act and which sites have covenants for open space conservation easements that can’t be developed. We are interested in identifying potentials sites that could be sold to generate money to the general fund. Thanks.
David Welch, SR/WA
City of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Director
Direct: 951.826.5556
Main: 951.826.5371
RiversideCA.gov
From: Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 7:52 AM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Welch, David <[email protected]> Cc: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Min, Elliot <[email protected]>; Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Some of the parks listed below, like Hole Lake and Mission Ranch, are park land and the PPA applies. I also think if we look at the Boy Scout Camp area of Fairmount Park staff reports, there may be restrictions on that one too. I remember it was going to be used in a swap but that caused a lot of up roar and some language that it will remain as park land. Also, with Hole Lake, it is in the Airport Protection Zone and any development is extremely limited. It can only really be used for open space purposes. Just some of my recollection.
Kristi
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 6:19 PM
To: Welch, David <[email protected]>
Cc: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>; Min, Elliot <[email protected]>; Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>; Smith, Kristi <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hi David,
The following is a list of parks that are either open space or not developed and some information regarding deed /acquisition;
1. Boy Scout Camp – park of Fairmount Park, formerly redevelopment agency.
2. Challen Park – It has a parking lot, but is mostly undeveloped. It is also designated as a regional park and has a lot of trails.
3. Golden Start Site – it was purchased with park impact fees and is currently leased to Toro
4. Hole Lake Site – Was received from the Friends of Riverside in exchange for the Agricultural Park
5. Loring – we recently have been awarded a grant from the CA Coastal Commission to do planning and design for this – also deeded for park purposes
6. Mission Ranch – Undeveloped local park
7. Mt. Vernon – Undeveloped Local Park
8. Mt Vernon Expansion – Open Space Purchased as a part of Box Springs. In the process of dedication of a conservation easement with RCA
9. Quail Run Site – Regional/ openspace Park Site
10. Tequesquite Sites – These parcels have been awarded a grant from the CCC for planning and design and are in MSHP cell zones.
11. Victoria-Cross Park – undeveloped local park
I attached our detailed park parcel inventory and highlight the above parcels. I think Elliot is working on the details of the Park Preservation Act, Park Development Fees and resulting restriction of park land sale. I have received a lot of calls wanting us to develop each of the undeveloped local parks (6,7 and 11). So sale of these parcels as well as any open space (friends of the hills) would most likely cause public protest.
I attached some background detail on some of the parcels and it would be great if you could get someone form Property Services to dive in deeper and flush out any of the ones I don’t have information on.
Thanks,
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside
Parks, Rec. and Comm. Serv., Planning & Design Division Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Welch, David <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 6:34 PM
To: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>
Cc: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>; Guzman, Rafael <[email protected]>; Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]> Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Adolfo,
Thanks for responding and I agree that these two properties will have very little vale. Can you provide me with a list of your sites that Parks & Recreation controls, but that are not considered part of the Park Preservation Act (1 acre or more)? For example, what about the properties located at Victoria & Cross or Washington & Bradley? Are these sites considered Parks? If not, would the money go to the General Fund?
David Welch, SR/WA
City of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Director
Direct: 951.826.5556
Main: 951.826.5371
RiversideCA.gov
From: Cruz, Adolfo [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:08 PM
To: Welch, David <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Hello David,
We have two properties.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Adolfo Cruz
City of Riverside, Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
6927 Magnolia Ave, 2nd Floor
P: 951-826-2075
RiversideCA.gov
From: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:14 AM
To: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Here are a few pieces of land we may be able to justify selling. But I doubt it has any commercial value. And if it is sold the money is supposed to go to park improvements per Park Act.
Randy McDaniel, RLA #4395
City of Riverside
Parks, Rec. and Comm. Serv., Planning & Design Division Main: 951.826.2000
Direct: 951.826.2006
RiversideCA.gov
From: Cruz, Adolfo <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 6:35 PM
To: McDaniel, Randy <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
Fyi, cannot think of any properties. Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Adolfo
From: Welch, David <[email protected]
>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 5:47 PM
To: Department Heads <[email protected]>
Cc: Smay, Sheryn <[email protected]>
Subject: CalPERS Challenge - Surplus Property
All,
As you may know, I have been tasked with preparing a list of potential City properties that could possibly be sold to generate revenue in efforts to help assist with the City’s CalPERS challenge. Please let me know if you have any properties in mind from your respective Departments that you may not need and
that can generate revenue for the General Fund so I can include them for future City Council consideration. Thanks.
David Welch, SR/WA
City of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Director
Direct: 951.826.5556
Main: 951.826.5371
RiversideCA.gov
Our Collective Mission: Ensure the well-being of residents, employees, and visitors in the City of Riverside by limiting the spread of COVID-19 and recovering in alignment with the Governor’s orders.
Response, RECOVERY, Thrive.
Keep Riverside healthy: Maintain healthy diet and exercise, wash your hands, and get vaccinated.
RiversideCA.gov/COVID-19