Riverside City Council
October 18, 2022

CITY OF

RJVE SIDE
Planning Commission
Memorandum
Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division 3900 Main Street, Riverside, CA 92522 1 Phone: ( 951) 826- 5371 1 RiversideCA. gov PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: JULY 22, 2021
AGENDA ITEM NO.: 5

PROPOSED PROJECT
Case Number
PR -2020- 000733* ( Tract Map No. 37733, Planned Residential Development Permit, Design Review, and Variance)
Due to a clerical error, the project was advertised as PR -2020- 000733. The correct case number is PR -2021- 000733 to correspond with the year that the project was created.

Request
To consider the following entitlements for a Planned Residential Development:
1) Tentative Tract Map ( TM -37733) to subdivide 10.06 acres into 41 single- family residential lots and lettered lots for private streets, common open space, and a detention basin;
2) Planned Residential Development Permit for the establishment of detached single- family residences, private streets and common open space; 3) Design Review of project plans; and
4) Variance to allow 6 foot high walls within a reduced perimeter landscape setback.

Applicant Nolan Leggio of Lurin Land, LLC
Project
Location
18875 Lurin Avenue, situated on the
southeast corner of Lurin Avenue
and Obsidian Dive.

APN 266- 100- 025

LURINAVE
Project Area 10. 06 acres
R
II
I'.

Ward 4
Neighborhood Orangecrest
a
Specific Plan Orangecrest
o
c ST
General Plan
Designation LDR - Low Density Residential
Zoning
Designation
OSP- RA- SP - Orangecrest Specific

DOV ING- LN --
Plan - Residential Agriculture Zone NORTH
Staff Planner
Judy Eguez, Associate Planner
951- 826- 3969
jeguez@riversideca. gov

RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:

1. DETERMINE that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the findings set forth in the case record and adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ( MMRP), pursuant

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
to Sections 15074 and 21081. 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines; and

2. APPROVE Planning Cases PR -2020-000733 (TM, PRD, DR, VR), based on the findings outlined in the staff report and summarized in the attached findings and subject to the recommended conditions ( Exhibits 1 and 2).

SITE BACKGROUND
The 10. 06 -acre project site consists of a single parcel with an average natural slope of 5. 63 percent. A metal barn and a concrete pad for a demolished residence, are located on the northeast corner of the site. The remainder of the project site is vacant.

Surrounding land uses include single- family residences to the north and south ( across Lurin Avenue), a residential development under construction to the east, and vacant land to the west Exhibit 3).

On May 13, 2008 the City Council annexed the project site under Annexation 107 (Planning Case P06- 0453). The resulting annexation of the 290 acres of the Alta Cresta area, established appropriate General Plan Land Use designations, and amended the Orangecrest Specific Plan establishing Planning Areas 107-A through 107-E. The subject project is located within Planning Area 107- C.

As a matter of information, the subject property includes an active Williamson Act Contract and is located within Agricultural Preserve No. 3. According to the Orangecrest Specific Plan, if the contract is cancelled and the Agricultural Preserve is diminished, the use of the land must be consistent with the R- 1- 13000 - Single Family Residential Zone.

PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval the following entitlements for development of the property with a Planned Residential Development ( PRD):

Tentative Tract Map ( TM 37733) to subdivide 10.06 acres into 41 residential lots and lettered lots for private streets, common open space, slopes and a detention basin; Planned Residential Development Permit for the establishment of detached single- family residences, private streets and common open space;
Design Review of project plans for the site design and building elevations; and Variance to allow 6 foot high walls within a reduced perimeter landscape setback along Lurin Avenue.

Individual proposed lots range in size from 5, 115 square feet to 7, 679 square feet and the proposed single- family residences range in size from 2,274 square feet to 3,783 square feet. The proposed residences consist of one and two stories with a maximum building height of 29 feet, 6 inches. The units include up to five bedrooms, four -and -a -half bathrooms, and a two - car garage. Three architectural styles ( Spanish Santa Barbara, Italianate, and Craftsman Bungalow) and five floor plans are proposed with varying building designs and rooflines for each of the plans.

The proposed common open space consists of a 20,574 square foot park, centrally located within the Planned Residential Development. Proposed amenities include bar- b- que facilities, picnic tables, tot lot, rubberized walking path, and a dog run. Each residential lot includes a minimum of 200 square feet of private open space.

Vehicular access to the project site is provided from Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. The internal private streets provide 30 guest parking spaces. The proposed project includes an internal

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)

PROJECT ANALYSIS
pedestrian network of sidewalks with enhanced street crossings and corner curb bulb - outs for safety.

Site perimeter walls consist of 6 -foot -high, split -face masonry walls. Interior vinyl fencing, 5 feet, 6 inches in height, is proposed along the interior property lines and 5 -foot, 6 -inch high split -face masonry wall is proposed between the park and adjacent residences. Split -face masonry walls are proposed along the side property lines of residences that side onto a street, as well as in the front yard between the residence and side yard. A 5 foot, 6 -inch - high tubular steel fence is proposed to secure the water quality treatment areas.

Authorization and Compliance Summary

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
Consistent Inconsistent
General Plan 2025
The General Plan 2025 Land Use designation for the project site is LDR - Low Density Residential ( Exhibit 4). The proposed project is consistent with the Objectives and Policies of the General Plan 2025, specifically:

Objective LU -75: Manage continued growth of the
Orangecrest neighborhood in a manner consistent with the Orangecrest Specific Plan, providing needed infrastructure as land develops.

Objective H- 1: Contributes to a high- quality, livable neighborhood that includes maintained housing, public
services, and open space
Objective LU -89: Accommodates flexible design that results in superior development that goes beyond the required
development standards
Orangecrest Specific Plan
The project site is in the Orangecrest Specific Plan ( Exhibit 5). The site is located within Planning Areas 107-C, which provides development standards for single- family residential uses. The Specific Plan does not provide development standards for PRDs meaning, the Project is subject to the standards of the underlying zones. Staff has determined that the proposed development is consistent with the development patterns of the Orangecrest Specific Plan.

As this project has an active Williamson Act Contract and is within Agricultural Preserve No. 3, the applicant has also submitted a concurrent request ( P20- 0523) to the Economic Development Division for the cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract and the Agricultural Preserve. A condition of approval has been included requiring the cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract and the Agricultural Preserve be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the map.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
Consistent Inconsistent
Zoning Code Land Use Consistency ( Title 19)
The project site is zoned OSP- RA - Orangecrest Specific Plan - Residential Agriculture Zone ( Exhibit 5). Upon cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract and the Agricultural Preserve, development of the property will be required to comply with the standards of the R-1- 13000 - Single Family Residential Zone.

The R-1-13000 Zone allows for a benchmark density of 4.8 dwelling units per acre with the approval of a Planned Residential Development Permit ( PRD). The applicant is proposing a total of 41 units with a density of 4.08 dwelling units per acre, complying with the overall maximum PRD density allowed in the Zone.

The proposed project is generally consistent with the applicable development standards of the Zoning Code, with the exception of 6 - foot - high walls within the project reduced perimeter landscape setback along Lurin Avenue. The Zoning Code allows for consideration of Variances to deviate from development standards. The applicant is requesting a Variance to facilitate the proposed project ( Exhibit 7).

Q
Subdivision Code Consistency ( Title 18)
The proposed tract map meets the development standards outlined in Chapter 18.210 of the Subdivision Code, including those for public streets and lot dimensions.

Q
Grading Code Consistency ( Title 17)
The conceptual grading plan collects and drains storm water and runoff to on- site treatment areas as required by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed project complies with the standards and provisions of Title 17 of the Riverside Municipal Code.

Q
Compliance with Citywide Design & Sign Guidelines
The proposed project provides five primary floor plans in three distinct architectural styles ( Spanish Santa Barbara, Italianate, and Craftsman Bungalow) with varied building shapes, roof lines, materials, and colors.

Architectural details are provided on the front, side, and rear facades of the dwelling units such as decorative trim, wood siding, and shutters.

Enhanced architecture is also provided on all elevations visible from Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive.

The conceptual landscape plan provides an attractive and welcoming environment, with the inclusion of shade trees and high- quality landscaping in amenity areas. The proposed project meets the objectives of the Citywide Design & Sign Guidelines.

Q

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)

COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Chapter 19. 780. 060 - Planned Residential Development Standards for R- 1- 13000 Zone Consistent Inconsistent
Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
The project site is located within Compatibility Zone D ( Primary Traffic Patterns and Runway Buffer Area) and Zone E (Other Airport Environs) of the of the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan RCALUCP) for March Air Reserve Base ( MARB). Zone D is exempt from residential density limits required in the RCALUCP, and Zone E does not require residential density limits. The proposed project is consistent with the RCALUCP for the March Air Reserve Base.

COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Chapter 19. 780. 060 - Planned Residential Development Standardsfor R- 1- 13000 Zone Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Maximum
Benchmark
Density

4.8 dwelling units/ acre 4.08 dwelling
units/ acre
Q
Maximum Lot
Coverage
Established by the
Approving Authority
50 percent Q
Maximum
Building Height
35 feet 29 feet, 6 inches Q
Number of
Stories 2 stories 2 stories Q
Minimum
Parking
2 garage spaces/ dwelling
unit
2 garage spaces/
dwelling unit
Q H
Minimum
Guest Parking
Spaces
1 guest space/ 3 dwelling
units
Total Required: 14 guest
spaces
30 guest spaces Q
Open Space
Common:
500 square feet/ unit
Total Required: 20, 500
square feet
20, 574 square feet Q
Private:
200 square feet/ unit
537 - 7, 679 square
feet/ unit
Q
Chapter 19. 780. 060 - Planned Residential Development Standards for R- 1- 13000 Zone ( Setbacks)
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Individual Lot
Setbacks
Front Yard 10 feet 15 - 25 feet Q
Side Yard 5 feet 5 feet Q
Rear Yard 10 feet 13 - 73 feet Q

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
Chapter 19. 780. 060 - Planned Residential Development Standards for R- 1- 13000 Zone ( Setbacks)
Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent
Project
Perimeter
Landscape
Setback
Adjacent to
Public Street
Lurin Avenue)
25 feet 10 - 16 feet Q
Project
Perimeter
Building
Setback
Adjacent to
Public Street
Obsidian
Drive)
25 feet 25 feet Q
Adjacent to
Perimeter
Property Lines
South
Property Line)
20 feet 21 - 34 feet Q
Landscape
Setback
No walls or fences Fences and walls Q

FINDINGS SUMMARY
Planned Residential Development Permit ( PRD)
The proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood. A Planned Residential Development at this location allows for flexibility and creativity in design, while allowing for residential amenities and gathering areas for residents.

The proposed project provides common area amenities, pedestrian and vehicular circulation and landscaping. The proposed project has also been designed to be consistent with and sensitive to the surrounding residential community and development pattern of the immediate neighborhood and will contribute to the buildout of the Orangecrest Specific Plan area.

Variance Findings
In the R-1-13000 Zone, the Zoning Code requires a project perimeter landscape setback of 25 feet adjacent to all public streets for Planned Residential Developments. The same Code provision does not allow any fences or walls within the reduced project perimeter landscape setback. The Applicant is requesting a Variance to allow 6 -foot high split -face block walls within a reduced project perimeter landscape setback of 10 feet to 16 feet along Lurin Avenue. The Applicant has provided Variance Justification findings in support of this request ( Exhibit 7).

The request for reduced project perimeter landscape setback with walls and fences is consistent with adjacent development under construction to the east that was approved with a 5 -foot perimeter landscape setback. In addition to the proposed 10 -foot to 16 -foot perimeter landscape setbacks, there will be 5 feet to 18 feet of landscaped parkway in the Lurin Avenue right- of- way.

This helps reduce the visual effect of the reduced project perimeter landscape setbacks, and allows the combined landscaped areas to soften the perimeter walls.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program MMRP) have been prepared for this project in accordance with Sections 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines and Sections 15074 and 21081. 6 of CEQA ( Exhibit 8).

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
The CEQA documentation states the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment, subject to implementation of the MMRP.

PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS
Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the site and property owners with active Williamson Act Contracts within a mile of the site. As of the writing of this report, no responses have been received by Planning Staff.

APPEAL INFORMATION
Actions by the City Planning Commission, including any environmental finding, may be appealed to the City Council within ten calendar days after the decision. Appeal filing and processing information may be obtained from the Planning Division, 3rd Floor, City Hall. 11!= r1Ma

1. Staff Recommended Findings

2. Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval

3. Location Map

4. General Plan Map

5. Zoning and Specific Plan Map

6. Project Plans ( Site Plan, Circulation/ Parking Plan, Open Space, Conceptual Landscape Plan, Fence and Wall Plan, Tentative Tract Map, Preliminary Grading Plan, Building Elevations, Floor Plans, Color and Material Sample Board)

7. Applicant Prepared Variance Justifications

8. Existing Site Photos

9. Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by: Judy Eguez, Associate Planner
Reviewed by: Candice Assadzadeh, Senior Planner and Patricia Brenes, Principal Planner Approved by: Mary Kopaskie- Brown, City Planner

PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)

CITY OF

RIVER IDE

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT 1 - STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
PLANNING CASES: PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
Variance Findings pursuant to Chapter 19. 720. 040
Variance Requested: To allow 6 -foot high split - face block walls within a 10 to 16 foot perimeter landscape setback along Lurin Avenue, where the Zoning Code requires 25 feet.

1. The strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Code would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code.

The proposal complies with this finding. Strict application of the Planned Residential Development Permit standards for the R- 1- 13000 Zone would require a 25 - foot landscape perimeter setback, free of any structures including walls and fences, when adjacent to public streets. The intent of the required setback is to ensure a uniform, well- designed project appearance from the public realm, and to balance the flexible development standards allowed by a Planned Residential Development for compatibility with surrounding development.

Compliance with the Zoning Code would result in wide, reverse - frontage landscaped areas on Lurin Avenue, which would be substantially larger than those of the surrounding development. Compliance would further require the proposed project to reduce usable private and common open space areas in exchange for creating unusable, passive landscaped areas on the perimeter; or to reduce internal private street widths. Either of these actions would result in a practical difficulty and an unnecessary hardship contrary to the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code, and more specifically the purpose of the Planned Residential Development Permit ordinance.

2. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to this property or to the intended use or development of this property which do not apply generally to other property in the same zone or neighborhood.

The proposal complies with this finding. The proposed project design situates the residential lots surrounding and facing onto central common open space amenity areas. This design results in a side and reverse frontage condition along Lurin Avenue, which is common throughout the surrounding neighborhood. However, a majority of the surrounding development consists of conventional subdivisions which are not subject to the same common usable open space or perimeter setback requirements applicable to Planned Residential Developments. In conventional subdivisions in the R- 1 Zones, reverse and side frontage lots are not subject to any perimeter landscaped setback requirement. Fence and wall setbacks, observed at existing developments in the immediate project area, range from zero to five feet.

Compliance with the required landscaped setback provision would create a landscaped setback area that would be inconsistent with the surrounding pattern of development, and constitute an exceptional circumstance that does not apply to other property in the same zone or neighborhood.

EXHIBIT 1- STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS July 22, 2021

3. Granting this request will not prove materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located.

The proposal complies with this finding. In addition to the proposed project perimeter landscape setback, there will be 5 feet to 18 feet of landscaped parkway on the Lurin Avenue right- of- way. The combination of the proposed perimeter landscaping and parkway will soften the aesthetic of the perimeter walls and create the appearance of a larger landscape setback. The proposed project will provide sufficient area for enhanced landscape planting along the public street frontages. It includes construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters. These improvements will benefit the Orangecrest neighborhood.

Granting the Variance request will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare and surrounding property improvements.

4. Granting the request will not be contrary to the objectives of the General Plan.

The proposal complies with this finding. Granting the Variance to allow a reduced project perimeter landscape setback along Lurin Avenue is not contrary to the objectives and policies of the General Plan 2025. The proposal will provide a diversity of single- family residential housing and product types within an existing single- family neighborhood consistent with General Plan 2025 Goal H- 1, Objective LU -75, and Objective LU -89.

EXHIBIT 1- STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS July 22, 2021

CITY OF

RIVERSIDE

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT 2 - STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING CASE: PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR)
Planning Division

1. Plans shall conform to the exhibits attached to this report. Proposed modifications to the approved design shall be submitted to the Planning Division and shall include revised exhibits and a narrative description of the proposed modifications. The applicant is advised that an additional application and fee may be required.

2. The subject property shall be developed and operated substantially as described in the text of this report and as shown on the project plans on file with this case except for any specific modifications that may be required by these conditions of approval.

3. Advisory: Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 19.620 of the Zoning Code.

Any new signs shall be subject to separate review and assessment. A separate sign application, including fees and plans, will be required prior to sign permit issuance.

Prior to Map Recordation:

4. A Resolution cancelling the active Williamson Act Contract and Agricultural Preserve No. 3 on the property shall be approved by the City Council.

5. The applicant shall prepare and record Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions ( CC& Rs) and documents creating a Homeowners Association ( HOA), subject to approval of the Planning Division and City Attorney' s Office. The CC& Rs/HOA shall contain the following:
a. Each buyer shall sign an acknowledgement that he/ she has read the Constitution and By -Laws of the HOA and the CC& Rs applying to the development, including any clause pertaining to private street and private driveways; b. The CC& Rs shall be irrevocably written and recorded so that the maintenance is the responsibility of the HOA for the life of the project. The CC& Rsshall clearly state that the HOA officers are responsible for the enforcement of the on -street parking regulations and are personally liable for any penalties, including citations, for the failure to follow through with their responsibilities;
c. The By -Laws or other appropriate document of the Homeowners' Association shall include the obligations of the Association with respect to maintenance of the private streets;
d. Maintenance of private streets;
e. Vehicles parked on a residential driveway shall not encroach onto the sidewalk or private street;
f. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of complaint; and g. All lettered lots shall be maintained by the HOA.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

Prior to Grading Permit Issuance:

6. Tract Map No. 37733 shall be recorded.

7. Mitigation Measure BIO -1: Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the Applicant shall make the appropriate mitigation fee payment into the MSHCP Stephens' kangaroo rat fee payment program for conservation of Stephens' kangaroo rat - occupied habitats in order to offset the loss of potentially suitable Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat on- site through project implementation.

8. Mitigation Measure BIO - 2: Prior to on- site vegetation clearance, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre- construction nesting bird survey in accordance with the following:
a. The survey shall be conducted no more than three days prior to the initiation of clearance/ construction work;
b. If pre - construction surveys indicate that bird nests are not present or are inactive, or if potential habitat is unoccupied, no further mitigation is required. c. If active nests of birds are found during the surveys, a species- specific no -disturbance buffer zone shall be established by a qualified biologist around active nests until said qualified biologist determines that all young have fledged ( i.e., no longer reliant upon the nest).
d. Close coordination among the developer of the site, the City of Riverside, the project engineer, and the consulting qualified biologist is recommended to consider vegetation clearance outside of the normal bird nesting season ( usually February 15 through September 15) to avoid impacts to nesting birds which would potentially violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It should be noted that bird nesting season is increasingly less definitive for some year- round resident species such as hummingbirds and raptors. Further, ground - dwelling birds such burrowing owls, can be affected nearly any time of the year if present. It is therefore advisable to conduct a pre -construction bird survey no matter the time of year. e. Removal of vegetation necessitates installation of appropriate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) measures, particularly if grading is not undertaken immediately, therefore careful timing of the project schedule and implementation measures is necessary to avoid water quality impacts

9. Mitigation Measure BIO - 3: The Project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a 30 -day pre -construction survey for burrowing owl. The results of the single one -day survey shall be submitted to the City prior to obtaining a grading permit. If burrowing owl are not detected during the pre -construction survey, no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owl are detected during the pre -construction survey, the Project applicant and a qualified consulting biologist will be required to prepare and submit for approval a burrowing owl - relocation program.

10. Mitigation Measure CUL -1: Archaeological Monitoring. At least 30 days prior to application for a grading permit and before any grading, excavation, and/ or ground - disturbing activities take place, the developer/ applicant shall retain a Secretary of Interior Standards - qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground - disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

The project archaeologist, in consultation with consulting tribes, the Developer, and the City, shall develop an Archaeological Monitoring Plan to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

Details in the plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The development of a rotating or simultaneous schedule in coordination with the developer/ applicant and the project archaeologist for designated Native American Tribal Monitors from the consulting tribes during grading, excavation, and ground - disturbing activities on the site, including the scheduling, safety requirements, duties, scope of work, and Native American Tribal Monitors' authority to stop and redirect grading activities in coordination with all project archaeologists; c. The protocols and stipulations that the Applicant, tribes, and project archaeologist/ paleontologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits, on nonrenewable paleontological resources that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation;
d. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural and paleontological resources, sacred sites, and human remains if discovered on the project site; and e. The scheduling and timing of the Cultural Sensitivity Training.

11. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a soil survey conducted by a licensed professional ( retained by the applicant and approved by the City) to determine levels of pesticides and or heavy metals shall be conducted on the site. If pesticide or heavy metal levels are not found on the Project site ( or are found below the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) threshold limits for human exposure), then no additional mitigation is required. However, if pesticide or heavy metal levels exceeding the EPA threshold limits for human exposure are found on site, then Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 would be required

12. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2: If the soil survey determines that pesticide or heavy metal levels are found on the Project site that exceed the EPA threshold limits for human exposure, a report of the findings and a Removal Action Plan ( RAW) shall be prepared by a qualified licensed professional ( retained by the applicant and approved by the City) and submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances ( DTSC) or other appropriate agency for review and approval. The report shall outline the procedures for removing contaminated soils from the Project site down to the level of contamination and for off- site disposal by a licensed contractor at a facility that accepts such contaminated soil. Soil shall not be reused on the Project site and new soil shall be imported from off site and used on the site during Project construction. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the DTSC and the City of Riverside Community Development Director or designee, and/ or Building and Safety Division or designee.

13. Mitigation Measure TRA -1: The Project applicant shall pay their Project Fair -Share fee of

0. 12 percent of the $ 61,583,924.03 total cost toward the City' s bicycle and pedestrian projects, which will be used to develop a Vehicle Miles Traveled mitigation bank study. This fee shall be paid the earlier of one ( 1) year after entitlement approval or prior to issuance of grading permit. The Project Fair -Share Cost equates to $ 74,036. 10 and shall be paid to the City of Riverside by the Project applicant.

14. Mitigation Measure TRC -1: Prior to grading permit issuance, if there are any changes to project site design and/ or proposed grades, the Applicant and the City shall contact consulting tribes to provide an electronic copy of the revised plans for review. Additional EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

consultation shall occur between the City, developer/ applicant, and consulting tribes to discuss any proposed changes and review any new impacts and/ or potential avoidance/ preservation of the cultural resources on the project site. The City and the developer/ applicant shall make all attempts to avoid and/ or preserve in place as many cultural and paleontological resources as possible that are located on the project site if the site design and/ or proposed grades should be revised. In the event of inadvertent discoveries of archaeological resources, work shall temporarily halt until agreements are executed with consulting tribe, to provide tribal monitoring for ground disturbing activities.

15. Mitigation Measure TRC -3: Cultural Sensitivity Training: The Secretary of Interior Standards County certified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall attend the pre -grading meeting with the developer/ permit holder' s contractors to provide Cultural Sensitivity Training for all construction personnel. This shall include the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areas and protocols that apply in the event that unanticipated resources are discovered. Only construction personnel who have received this training can conduct construction and disturbance activities in sensitive areas. A sign - in sheet for attendees of this training shall be included in the Phase IV Monitoring Report.

16. A 40 -scale precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division and include the following notes:
a. Hours of construction and grading activity are limited to between 7:00 a. m. and 7:00 p. m. weekdays and 8:00 a. m. and 5:00 p. m. Saturdays. No construction noise is permitted on Sundays or Federal Holidays;
b. Compliance with City adopted interim erosion control measures; c. Compliance with any applicable recommendations of qualified soils engineer to minimize potential soil stability problems; and
d. Include a note requiring the developer to contact Underground Service Alert at least 48 hours prior to any type of work within pipeline easement.

17. The project shall abide by the SCAQMD' s Rule 403 concerning Best Management Practices for construction sites in order to reduce emissions during the construction phase.

Measures may include:
a. Development of a construction traffic management program that includes, but is not limited to, rerouting construction related traffic off congested streets, consolidating truck deliveries, and providing temporary dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction traffic to and from site;
b. The project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards;
c. A 15 mile per hour speed limit shall be enforced on unpaved portions of the construction site;
d. All grading activities shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour; e. Trucks hauling soil, dirt or other emissive materials shall have their loads covered with a tarp or other protective cover as determined by the City Engineer; f. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved public roads;
Trucks and other equipment leaving the site shall be washed; g.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

h. Ground cover in disturbed areas shall be replaced immediately after construction; and
i. Disturbed/ loose soil shall be kept moist at all times.

During Grading and Construction Activities:

18. Mitigation Measure TRC - 2: Treatment and Disposition of Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this project, the following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries:
a. Consulting Tribes Notified: within 24 hours of discovery, the consulting tribe( s) shall be notified via email and phone. The developer shall provide the city evidence of notification to consulting tribes. Consulting tribe( s) will be allowed access to the discovery, in order to assist with the significance evaluation. b. Temporary Curation and Storage: During the course of construction, all discovered resources shall be temporarily curated in a secure location on site or at the offices of the project archaeologist. The removal of any artifacts from the project site will need to be thoroughly inventoried with tribal monitor oversight of the process; and c. Treatment and Final Disposition: The landowner( s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non - human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to cultural resources. The Applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the City of Riverside Community and Economic Development Department with evidence of same:

I. Accommodate the process for on- site reburial of the discovered items with the consulting Native American tribes or bands. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts.

Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed;

11.1f reburial is not feasible, a curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore will be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/ researchers for further study. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary;
III. At the completion of grading, excavation, and ground - disturbing activities on the site, a Phase IV Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the City documenting monitoring activities conducted by the project archaeologist and Native Tribal Monitors within 60 days of completion of grading. Thisreport shall document the impacts to the known resources on the property; describe how each mitigation measure was fulfilled; document the type of cultural resources recovered and the disposition of such resources; provide evidence of the required cultural sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the required pre -grade meeting; and, in a confidential appendix, include the daily/ weekly monitoring notes from the archaeologist. All reports produced will be submitted to the City of Riverside, Eastern Information Center, and interested tribes.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

19. Discovery of Human Remains: In the event that human remains ( or remains that may be human) are discovered at the Project site during grading or earthmoving, the construction contractors, Project Archaeologist, and/ or designated Native American Monitor shall immediately stop all activities within 100 feet of the find. The Project proponent shall then inform the Riverside County Coroner and the City of Riverside Community & Economic Development Department immediately, and the coroner shall be permitted to examine the remains as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050. 5(b) unless more current State law requirements are in effect at the time of the discovery. Section 7050. 5 requires that excavation be stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If human remains are determined as those of Native American origin, the Applicant shall comply with the state relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the jurisdiction of the NAHC ( PRC Section 5097). The coroner shall contact the NAHC to determine the most likely descendant( s). The MLD shall complete his or her inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The Disposition of the remains shall be overseen by the most likely descendant( s) to determine the most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associated grave artifacts.

The specific locations of Native American burials and reburials will be proprietary and not disclosed to the general public. The County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission in accordance with California Public Resources Code 5097. 98.

According to California Health and Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery ( Section 8100), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony ( Section 7052). The disposition of the remains shall be determined in consultation between the Project proponent and the MLD. In the event that the Project proponent and the MLD are in disagreement regarding the disposition of the remains, State law will apply and the median and decision process will occur with the NAHC ( see Public Resources Code Section 5097. 98( e) and 5097. 94( k)).

20. Construction and operation activities on the property shall be subject to the City' s Noise Code ( Title 7), which limits construction noise to 7:00 a. m. to 7:00 p. m. weekdays, and 8:00 a. m. to 5:00 p. m. Saturdays. No construction noise is permitted on Sundays or federal holidays.

21. The project shall comply with all existing State Water Quality Control Board and City storm water regulations, including compliance with NPDES requirements related to construction and operation measures to prevent erosion, siltation, transport of urban pollutants, and flooding.

22. The Construction Contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site.

23. The Construction Contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise - sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.

24. The applicant shall be responsible for erosion and dust control during construction phases of the project.

25. To reduce diesel emissions associated with construction, construction contractors shall provide temporary electricity to the site to eliminate the need for diesel - powered electric generators or provide evidence that electrical hook ups at construction sites are not cost effective or feasible.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

Prior to Building Permit Issuance

26. Mitigation Measure BIO -4: In accordance with MSHCP provisions limiting the use of exotic and invasive plant species, the Project' s landscape plan shall exclude invasive species such as, but not limited to crimson fountain grass ( Pennisetum setaceum), pampas grass Cortaderia selloana), giant reed ( Arundo donax), tree of heaven ( Ailanthus altissima), eucalyptus, and other ornamental landscape elements on the list of exotic invasive plants utilized by the Riverside Conservation Authority which have to potential to spread into adjoining, downstream, or nearby areas.

27. Construction plans submitted for Plan Check review shall include a copy of these Conditions of Approval.

28. Construction plans submitted for Plan Check review should specify the location, design and color of all domestic water meters, backflow preventers, and all on- and off- site utility cabinets subject to Planning Division and Public Utilities' review and approval. The visibility of such facilities shall be minimized and include use of the smallest equipment possible, be painted green, and include of some form of screening including but not limited to berming, landscaping, and/ or installation of a screen wall.

29. Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted for Planning staff approval. Design modifications may be required as deemed necessary. Separate applications and filing fees are required. The following shall be included:
a. All landscaping fronting onto the perimeter streets shall consist of tiered plant materials, subject to Planning Staff review and approval. b. A band of decorative paving shall be incorporated at each main project driveway entrance.

Prior to Release of Utilities and/ or Occupancy:

30. Install the landscape and irrigation per the approved plans and submit the completed Certificate of Substantial Completion" ( Appendix C of the Water Efficient Landscaping and Irrigation Ordinance Summary and Design Manual) signed by the Designer/ auditory responsible for the project. Contact the project planner to schedule the final inspection at least one week prior to needing the release of utilities.

Standard Conditions:

31. There is a 36 -month time limit in which to satisfy the conditions and record this map. Six subsequent one- year time extensions may be granted by the Community & Economic Development Director upon request by the applicant. Application for a one- year time extension must be made prior to the expiration date of the map. No time extension may be granted for applications received after the expiration date of the map.

32. Planned Residential Development permits, Design Review and Variance, related to an implementing subdivision, may be granted time extensions by the Community & Economic Development Director or their designee up to a total of six years beyond the original approval expiration date prior to issuance of any building permits. Once a building permit has been issued the Planned Residential Development will be considered vested and time extensions are no longer needed. At the exhaustion of Community & Economic Development Director approved extensions, the original Approving or Appeal Authority following a public hearing noticed pursuant to Section 19.670.030 ( Notice of Hearing for Discretionary Actions Requiring a Public Hearing), may grant one final permit extension of up to two years. A public hearing notification fee is required of the applicant in such case in addition to a time extension fee.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE APPLICANT WILL NOT BE NOTIFIED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION ABOUT THE PENDING EXPIRATION OF THE SUBJECT ENTITLEMENT.

33. Within 30 days of approval of this case by the City, the developer shall execute an agreement approved by the City Attorney' s Office to defend, indemnify, including reimbursement, and hold harmless the City of Riverside, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Riverside, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval by the City' s advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning this approval, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499. 37 of the Government Code. The City will promptly notify the developer of any such claim; action or proceeding and the City will cooperate in the defense of the proceeding.

34. This project shall fully and continually comply with all applicable conditions of approval, State, Federal and local laws in effect at the time the permit is approved and exercised and which may become effective and applicable thereafter, and in accordance with the terms contained within the staff report and all testimony regarding this case. Failure to do so will be grounds for Code Enforcement action, revocation, or further legal action.

35. Enumeration of the conditions herein shall not exclude or excuse compliance with all applicable rules and regulations in effect at the time this permit is exercised.

Fire Department

36. A residential fire sprinkler system meeting National Fire Protection Association 13D is required. Attached garages are required to be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system. Plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Department prior to installation. 2016 California Residential Code, Section R313, 2016 California Fire Code, Section 903. 2. 8 or Riverside Municipal Code, Section 16. 32. 335.

Minimum of a 1 -inch water meter.

37. Requirements for construction shall follow the currently adopted California Building Code and California Fire Code with City of Riverside amendments.

38. Construction plans shall be submitted and permitted prior to construction.

39. Fire Department access shall be maintained during all phases of construction.

40. Access roadways in excess of one hundred and fifty ( 150) feet in length shall be provided with a provision for turn around. Such provisions shall be of a design approved by the Fire Department.

41. The Fire Department access roadway shall meet the 80,000 -pound load and all- weather surface. Any alternate methods to meet the 80,000 -pound load shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. The turning radius shall meet the minimum required 28' inside radius and 48' outside radius.

42. Plot out the parking conditions on the plan
a. Street width ( curb to curb) less than 28 feet: No parking for both side b. Street width less than 36 feet. Allow parking on one side. c. No parking on cul- de- sac.

43. Show the posting of required fire lanes on the plan as they relate to the parking conditions on the private street. ( CFC, Sec. 503. 3) ( RMC, Sec. 16. 32. 280) EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

Parks, Recreation & Community Services

44. Prior to Map Recordation, developer shall make payment of all applicable Park Development Impact fees ( regional/ reserve and trail fees) for any recorded ROW, HOA common landscape areas or private street lots.

45. Prior to Building Permit Issuance, developer shall make payment of all applicable Park Development Impact Fees ( local, aquatic, regional/ reserve and trail fees) for privately developed areas.

Public Works - Land Development

46. A " FINAL MAP" shall be processed with the Public Works Department and recorded with the County Recorder. The " FINAL MAP" shall be prepared by a Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer authorized to practice Land Surveying I the State of California and shall comply with the State Subdivision Map Act and Title 18 of the Riverside Municipal Code. All applicable checking and recording fees are the responsibility of the applicant.

47. Deed for widening Lurin Avenue to 33 feet from monument centerline to Public Works specifications.

48. Deed for widening Obsidian Drive to 33 feet from monument centerline to Public Works specifications.

49. Installation of curb and gutter at 20 feet from monument centerline, sidewalk and matching paving on project side of Obsidian Drive to Public Works specifications. 12 feet of additional pavement required on opposite side of centerline to public works specifications.

50. Installation of curb and gutter at 20 feet from monument centerline, sidewalk and matching paving on Lurin Avenue to Public Works specifications.

51. Full improvement of interior streets based on private residential street standards.

52. Advisory: Project to have sewer service provided by WMWD, will serve letter required.

53. Off- site improvement plans to be approved by Public Works prior to map recordation.

54. A surety prepared by Public Works to be posted to guarantee the required off- site improvements prior to map recordation.

55. Storm Drain construction will be contingent on engineer' s drainage study.

56. Prior to final inspection for the development project, the applicant shall pay the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ( TUMF) in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment. If the project improvements include qualifying right- of- way dedications and/ or street improvements to a TUMFregional arterial roadway as identified on the Regional System of Highways and Arterials, the developer may have the option to enter into a Credit/ Reimbursement Agreement with the City and Western Riverside Council of Governments ( WRCOG) to recover costs for such work based on unit costs as determined by WRCOG.

The terms of the agreement shall be in accordance with the RMC Chapter 16. 68 and the TUMF Administrative Plan requirements. Credit/ reimbursement agreements must be fully executed prior to receiving any credit/ reimbursement. An appraisal is required for credit/ reimbursement of right of way dedications and credit/ reimbursement of qualifying improvements requires the public bidding and payment of prevailing wages in accordance with State Law. For further assistance, please contact the Public Works Department.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

57. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval, a project specific WQMP that:
a. Addresses Site Design BMP's such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or zero discharge" areas and conserving natural areas;
b. Incorporates the applicable Source Control BMP' s as described in the Santa Ana River Region WQMP and provides a detailed description of their implementation; c. Incorporates Treatment Control BMP' s as described in the Santa Ana River Region WQMP and provides information regarding design considerations; d. Describes the long- term operation and maintenance requirements for BMP's requiring long- term maintenance; and
e. Describes the mechanism for funding the long- term operation and maintenance of the BMP's requiring long- term maintenance.

58. Prior to issuance of any building or grading permits, the property owner shall record a Covenant and Agreement" with the County - Clerk Recorder or other instrument acceptable to the City Attorney to inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved project - specific WQMP. Other alternative instruments for requiring implementation of the approved project - specific WQMP include: requiring the implementation of the project - specific WQMP in the Home Owners Association or Property Owners Association Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions ( C, C& R's); formation of Landscape, Lighting and Maintenance Districts, Assessment Districts or Community Service Areas responsible for implementing the project - specific WQMP; or equivalent may also be considered. Alternative instruments must be approved by the City prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits.

59. If the project will cause land disturbance of one acre or more, it must comply with the statewide General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. The project applicant shall cause the approved final project specific WQMP to be incorporated by reference or attached to the project' s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan as the Post - Construction Management Plan.

60. Prior to building or grading permit closeout or the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or certificate of use, the applicant shall:
a. Demonstrate that all structural BMP' s described in the project specific WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications;
b. Demonstrate that applicant is prepared to implement all non- structural BMP' s described in the approved project specific WQMP; and
c. Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved project specific WQMP are available for the future owners/ occupants.

61. On all plans, provide linear footage labels along all parcel lines. PLANT24" box size Trees species TBD) in PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY between curb and sidewalk with root barriers along all hardscape and deep root automatic irrigation system. Schedule site inspection after fine grading and hardscape installation is completed at least two working days prior, for Tree Inspector to determine precise locations for new plantings. No planting to occur prior to scheduled site inspection. Planting, staking, irrigation, root barriers to Landscape & Forestry specifications.

62. Size, number, and location of driveways to Public Works specifications.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

Public Utilities - Electric

63. Plot existing electrical distribution facilities on the original site plan.

64. Power source is northwest corner of Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive - customer is required to install Vault, PSE, and PJC's required along Lurin Avenue.

65. Advisory: Existing OH Edison lines on the north side of Lurin Avenue.

Western Municipal Water District

66. Compliance with water efficient landscape requirements per the City of Riverside Ordinance No. 859.

67. All applicable Added Facilities Charges ( for water facilities), Sewer Connection Fees, Annexation Fees and Meter Installation Fees, must be paid prior to the installation of any water meter.

68. Proposed facilities for water and sewer service must be designed by a Registered Civil Engineer and reviewed and approved by Western. Deposit for Plan Check must be received prior to plan check and Deposit for Inspection must be received prior to approval of the plans.

69. Western, as a member agency of Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ( MWD) will enforce MWD' s Plan for Water Use Efficiency Guideline requirements for water conservation.

70. Developer' s landscape architect is required to consult with Western' s Water Resources Department to review Western' s conservation efforts.

71. The property is located within the 1900 Pressure Zone. Currently, Western has an existing 8" water pipeline located along Lurin Avenue service connection to the proposed project.

The available Fire Flow must be determined by a flow test of fire flow modeling.

72. Coordinate with fire protection agency of jurisdiction to determine required fire flow for the proposed project and advise Western of the fire flow requirements. Submit request to Western for fire flow modeling to determine if existing water systems capacity is available to provide the required fire flow. Depending the results of the fire flow modeling additional conditions of approval such as upsizing of existing pipes, extension of pipes, installation of parallel piping or installation of pumps, at the developer' s cost, may be required.

73. Developer to submit a 22" x 34" preliminary onsite and/ or offsite plan of water and/ or sewer plan layout to Western before formal submittal of Water and/ or Sewer Improvement Plans.

74. Developer to submit a 22" x 34" preliminary onsite and/ or offsite " Master Utility Plan" showing existing and proposed water, sewer and recycled plan layout for approval to Western before formal submittal of water and sewer construction plans.

75. Master Utility Plan shall show the following items:
a. Provide basis of survey with date, surveyor information, datum and basis of bearing. b. Delineate all existing utility facilities ( i.e.; pipe diameter, pipe material, manholes, water meters, air/ vac, blow - off, fire hydrants, valves, sewer, gas, communication, electrical, etc.) within project boundaries and along project boundaries and any off- site improvements. Show existing water and sewer facilities with reference to Western record documents. Show future ( proposed) utilities of Tract 37593. Check Western existing pipeline depth with grading plans to confirm depth of pipe from bottom of proposed grade of proposed street subbase and maintain required depth of pipe as EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

measured from subbase and other grading. Propose relocation of pipeline as needed.
c. Delineate all easements within project boundaries with metes and bounds, width of easements ( if needed), owners of interest and brief description of easement purposes.
d. Delineate all proposed and existing lots, streets, and storm drains. e. Delineate all proposed water, sewer and/ or recycled water facilities within project boundaries. Include pipeline diameters and type of material. f. Show replacement of 6" existing water pipeline along the perimeter of the subdivision in Lurin Avenue with water pipeline to match existing waterline to the east or 12" pipeline as required by Western. Relocate any recycled water facilities in Lurin Avenue that do not meet Westerns standards for location. g. Sewer is required to be collected into Western' s to flow southerly to Markham Sewer Lift Station basin per the 2004 Riverside Sewer Master Plan. h. Show location of water meters, sizes and location and sizes of RPDA' s ( reduced pressure detector assemblies). The Master Utility Plan will be used for meter fees and meter drop requests.

76. Developer to submit a detailed engineer' s construction cost estimate to Western for review and approval. Once approved Developer shall make a deposit for plan checking services for Water and/ or Sewer Improvement Plans.

77. Water and/ or Sewer Improvement Plans shall be designed per Western' s Standard Specifications. Please review Western' s Standard Specifications for submittal formats and requirements online at http:// www. wmwd. com/ 158/ Standard- Specifications- Drawings

78. Developer to submit grading plans for Western' s review and approval before grading permit is issued. Please ensure that proper depth of cover is maintained over existing and proposed Western pipelines during grading especially in street areas were depth of pipe is measured from the bottom of the subbase of the pavement structural section.

79. Water and/ or Sewer Improvement Plans shall not be approved until all items mentioned above are received and approve by Western.

80. The developer is responsible for installing, paying all costs, and obtaining an encroachment permit from the local jurisdiction having authority over installation of water and/ or sewer facilities including laterals in the public right- of- way. If the customer chooses to cross private property, then the customer is responsible to obtain private easements from adjacent property owners.

81. Provide and/ or pay all applicable cost and fees including connection facilities, relocation of facilities, and additional facilities that may be necessary to accommodate applicant' s proposed water and sewer usage, while maintaining resiliency of pipelines within Western' s distribution system. This may include the upsizing of pipelines, installation of pressure reduction, and or pump stations ( subject to the application of appropriate credits for additional facilities provided by the applicant).

82. For water and/ or sewer service by Western, the developer mut comply with the " Standard Conditions," and all applicable Rules, Regulations, and General Policies of Western at the time of construction.

83. Contact Western' s Development Services Department at ( 951) 571- 7100 for further information.

EXHIBIT 2- STAFF RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL July 22, 2021

MARIPOSA - AVProject Site ` ''.
myg, 111
PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR), Exhibit 3 - Location Map 0 75 150 Feet
ANORTH
LDR
LDR
W
N
a
a
J Mop'
lir ISiIiIHhIIuuui Project Site
WOODCRE LDR Low Density ResidentialLDR r
LDR
KEY
Project Site
1 ROW
z

MCDOWELL

RDNNHNNHNNNNNNNNNNN
LURINV

NEWSOMERD
HqEEEEEE
General Plan Land Use Designation
pirl A/RR - AGRICULTURAL/RURALRESIDENTIAL
1111/ 111111MDR - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

P - PARK
VLDR - VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A RRq
ifilliagaiLDR LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL y
i i I q q

ARNHEMANMNNNNNHN
i
PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR), Exhibit 4 - General Plan Map 0 75 150 300 AFeet NORTH Project Site
OSP- RA- SP - Orangecrest Specific Plan -
Residential Agriculture Zone
0 2440500

LEMONWOOD LT ,
R' 1- 10500
SPII/

MCDOWELL- RD
KEY
Project Site
Specific Plan
SP - Orangecrest Specific Plan
Zoning Designation
OSP- RA - Orangecrest Specific Plan - Residential Agriculture R-1-7000 - Single - Family Residential
R-1-8500 - Single - Family Residential
R-1- 10500 - Single - Family Residential
R-1- 13000 - Single - Family Residential
R-1- 112 Acre - Single - Family Residential
RE - Residential Estate

ARIPOSA' AV
ce
c'
z!
Q'

WOODCREST LN

OSP- RA
SP
LURIN_ AV____
Sp -

OSP- RA
SP
R- 1- 13000
R- 1- 1/ 2 acre
SP

DOVING LN

NEWSOME RD
RE __
SP

CIT-Y' BOUNDARY
N,
PR -2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR), Exhibit 5 - Zoning and Specific Plan Map 0 75 150 300 AFeet NORTH TRANS200. 118520 81
301116213
0 I0s1
FUTURE

CITY PARK
INLET
1113,81.001710119
g
I- A:
01ti7if. rs
vel
ZV
Irv.

EBILWN
fir*
toriTe
J
1I
s0' 18'
1171110E5 SCREENSO 431111
N70a1Ew7pFs( 71. 1
370.010K0101E0 8388813
662
9, LW/NAVE
DaIORW
FI08L 4
PO [ PTV 000802P1IPREP11011, 01. 81313117100
15 PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans NUMBERED LOTS:
101113
1516111819203122
68055nr Iw
5617sso56585677
5871
59115871
5W
567259. 6104567056706. 5
D/ 444. spasmsetsr.
849
9481071120MI964
82006632537
318580648715147516371428186413291227
W10111 DEPTH
sr56 103,
50 1E1
50 119'
50 117.

50. 111
9Y 1112
50 1112

50. 117
50 119'
56 105'
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK..
2728
41AVERAGE

1. 101 ARSECT ACREAGE AS 806 AG ( 70. 06 GROSS AC)

ACREAGE
1038ttRY

A LOT MOSS AREA
6 13109/2201- LMBw)
51C SLOPES/ OPEN SPACE
FARMS
0E. ROW TO . Pow'
F. ROW /0 /C4PO (095IXN/ OR. AND LU AVE)
4 5T
005au4T1.810.619PER/TNTESNes4x
1esx
10Z
2 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 27f3665474/ 5 LOW- LON LENS,
RESDEA5141 ( 3- 6 66/ AC)
1 EXISTING 761 G l44 - SP RESk4NTL4L ALWK7.4126841 AND
SPEC/ RC FLAN ( 08473ECREST) 0/ 0/0147 ZONES
A PROPOSED ZONING. PER CwANOECRGT SR ENE CAN SE
DEVELOPED TO R- 1-! 5666 UPON CACEILIIAO11 OE » 000C) 5255 AGINCIAIURAL PRESERVE Atl. J
P OPOSEO AA2 02222G UNITS 4l LOA

6. PROPOSED PROJECT DEASYI7/ 4. 06 06/ A6

7. masa, 207 SSE' 5. 115 S'0 77
6 4128417 < OT 5/2Y 5656 50. FT.

9. E14N1N6 07 SURRIXMY 0 PROPER", / 0 - I - I3000
IO. AYERAGE NARTRAL SLOPE 0 SN£.' 5078.

PARKING SUMMARY:
64444.
5115
scos7679
5639
696371105748
5303539353935334
4705826TOTAL LOTAAEAN

PARKING REQUIRED
ENCLOSED GARAGE SPACE ( 2 PER UNIT)
GUESTPARKINGSPACE (1PER3UNITS) TOTALREQUIRED
MAX 1.01 AREA.,
821496

PARKING PROVIDED
ENCLOSED GARAGE SPACE ( 2 PERUNIT) 80
ON -STREET GUEST PARKING 30
TOTAL PROVIDED: 110
m.. sm.so7r.
763
2008
11291168
1130071106411129
746262
12581M8261,03
WWI

50. sr51,
67941168
NOTES)
USE ENHANCED ELEVATIONS ON ALL ELEVATIONS THAT FACE PUBLIC STREETS.

ALL AC CONDENSERS TO BE PLACED IN THE SIDE YARD OR REAR YARD AND FULLY SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

ALL SCE TRANSFORMERS TO BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW WITH LANDSCAPING.

ALL DRIVEWAYS TO BE 16' WIDE.

NORTH
77==7740' 80' 160'
DEPTH
137.
106
113

PRELIMINARY CIRCULATION AND

PARKING PLAN

PROPERTY BOUNDARY
6 LI4W AI£
UL RAWIE R --..,
LOTA vnRIES 5', 11,EIN•—
r1I v
III J
o M 0
rAm
p AS
I
n
16 z,
R q E!
3 W
I15 1 ems .
i— a
i, I u4aeoxss JT
4 I I S b
II`/
11 MI MI
4 I
ZB 18.

F rrxo JnAi
JIJ50

MMIOMIPP
SII 1.___ k r7us llll, i JJ
11 1rrmz i
1O
Fs
31 vI In
r7t o
Jn a
1,
r
a
s 2.1 L' 8— — ry
1 J
a=
1 7 • 1As
Im
ry
rvu a
a 1nl. s
rrJe. 4
J° 11JAI
JO
ntT
r
o J so-
I1Jss
iiiP

VANBNRENKO

KRA ERIA AVE
ROJECT

SITE LION NC

MARIPOSA AVT
MAMMA AVE.
9 A

VICINITY MAP
LEGEND:
45= Lev NUMBER

ROE SLOPE
II TOP
OFF
SLOPE

DAN/GMTLINEPROPOSEDWALL

IMO PROPOSED SURFACE ELEVATION
1378..3 = PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION

DECORATIVE PAVEMENT

PARK/ NG REQUIREMENTS
PARKING REDO/ RED: / SPACE PER 3 UN/ TS = 14 SPACES REDU/ RED PARKING SPACES PROPOSED = 30 PARIO G SPACES
SLY / x

SCALE IN FE
7ENTAMETRACT MAP NO 37733
CS9CUL4 TION/ PARKA4G PLAN
C/ TYGf RIERS/ DE
PAEPAI19. 7PO4

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CEN7ER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
AfgeENG/NEERS
comp. .6102E9P • alt 2.9M
SHEET
1 OF 1
SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

OPEN SPACE PLAN
TmTRAIaCT DENTZIO
1 r/ 13/2o N I
11/23/20 I
OWNER/ DEVELOPER:

LUNN LAND 1, LLC
0621 CASC CENTER DR.

RANCHO CUC ONGA, C4 91730

CONTACT NOLAN LECCTO
ENG/ NEER:

NYC ENGINEERS 1880 COMPTON
AVENUE CORONA, CA 91881- 33X7
51) 734- 1130 CONTACT.

MATTHEW UNNONCH, PE.
40BO' 110'

SGMF IN FE,
SETBACK / NFORMAT/ ON:

IRERR03-1-1/2.. 00037R71/21Scbads tom Project Perimeters Aw. amwP. HASHeer
Same as base mne. 15e setback shall
be fully landscapedand no fencesor
wells shell be perr51. 410 ewe.

Imo the set151,
341. 4010 Perimeter
ProperlyLInesSetb.k.wm M o. a„. a, ay moANNex
m en. NbrePRD,
Dom Yard Setback
Side yard Setback Sft
Rear TanISetback 1017.

Single- family Residential Rase lanes
Building barksAya¢ ntw Pumtareet
E
Al Mz
2511. 20
30 ft 36ftA. FrontR. SideC. Rear
LEGEND:
1245
a
VPNBUREN &y°

TYP/ CAL LOT SETBACKS
O IMAM£ RIA AVE
PROJECT...,
SITE
aj
aMARIPOSAAPE

LUPIN AVE

NAMOINA AVE
I L

VICINITY MAP
NUMBERED LOTS: ENSPAG' WATER
EX/ S77. SEWER
EX/ S7/ NG RECLAIM. WATER
Dass G STORM ORA/ N

PROPOSED WALL
ENSPRO CONTOUR EN A770N

LOT NUMBER

TOEO FSELOPDAK/ GHT L/ NE

DECORATIVE PAVEMENT

REN, NT/ AL NAN LAYOUT

RES/ OENPAL GARAGE PARKWAY
REMAINDER RENOEN7/ AL LOT

SYOEALKSTREETLANDSCAPEROAD WA Y
PART/ OPEN SPACE ( H09 MANTA/ NEO)
PENDEN77AL FEAR TARO-
75/ 047/VATE OPE SPACE ( HOME - OWER
MANTA/NENNPALREARYARD- PR/ VA751( 9 TS gOPES ( HONE - OER MA/ NTARNED) BARN ( 007110115741. 0)
MAGNOLIA GRAN0171053 ( 30070505440150114)
PANS ELL4RICA ( AFGHAN PINE)
PLATA US RACEM054 ( CAIN: RNA SYCAMORE)
PROSOP/ S CHlENS// S ( 1161EA5 MLSOU/ TE)

ULAIUS PARNFOL/ A ( CHINESE ELM)

GELREU/ ERA B/ P/ NNATA ( CHINESE FLAME TREE)

STATEMENT OF PREPARER

HEREBY STATE PAT THUS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER

MY SC/PEWS/ ON D THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS
KNOWLEDGE OFD CONSENTS TO E 17L/ NG OF THUS MAP
MATTHEW L LANINOVICAL PE.

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:

IJV
LATE
O 55ARu ixPriwrte Open

13.3eSOFT. WIDTH DEPTH O 50.W. w PtiwneOpen506.5. n. WIDTH Duni 5245 849 51. 783
5617 934 5118 1065 102.
948 52 7008 132.
1071 27 7679 152.
5677 1244 1. 105.
5651 1021 56( 9 1168 10T
5505 9. 1016 7238
5872 954 31 1130
860 ll% 7110 1571
5949 120' 5748 105.
11 5911 632 1. 105.
5871 537 SST
746 105.
718 115 37 5393 105.
5922 116 53.
16 5872 649 5395 1258
17 1148
ROO 1475 41 4768 8, 6
5670 AVERAGE 3124 1, 140 113
5670 1428 TOTAL LOT AREA= 18, 069
21 1864 MAR 101, 11EA 7, 679
5565 1379 MINIMUM LOT AREA = 537
6895 1227

PARK/ OPEN SPACE
LOT AREAN513FT
20574
0/ 00500 SOFT)

1. TOTAL 7001107 ACREAGE / 5 9. 08 AC. ( 1005 GROSS 90)

ACREAGE SUMMARY
GRMI
ACREAGE E2EUDENr
A. MR51 55X
B. ORNNAGE ( WONP BAS/ N) 083 B%
C SLOPES/ OPEN SPACE 045 4$
0 PARKS 047 5$
E. ROW O ROW T. 1B$
F ROW DED/ CAT/ ON ( OBS/ DAN 0. 98 10$

DR AND LFN AVE)

2. EX/S77,66E0714GENERALPLANDESIGNATION. EOR- LOWDENSITYRESIDENTGL ( 3- 6 DU/ AC) EX/5T/N64: RASP RES/ OENTI L AGF3ULDNAL D

SPECIFIC PLAN ORMNANGECREST) OVERLAY ZONES

4. PROPOSED 70. 67 PER ORANGEGREST SP, S. CAN BE
OEN- LOPED TO R- 1- 13000 UPON C4NCELLAT/ ON OF WOODCRE,

AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE
5 PROPOSED NO OF DWELL/ NG UN/ TS. 41 LOTS.

6. PROPOSED PRCUEC7 045501/ 607 011/ 0.
7 M/NIMUM LOT S. 5, 115 50. FT
AVENICE LOT 5/ ZEN' 5, 856 50. FT
ZONING OF SURROUND/ NG PROPER, R- 1- 13000
10AIEFAGE NATURAL SLOPE lw N. 77 5074

LETTERED LOTS
LOTH°.
6Ra I"
54 0€ 3000 TON
A
3,2551,526 SLOPE
20, 524 PARK/ OPEN SPAR
D 35, 189 WOMP BASIN
SLOPE/CONSERVATIONMENTF 4, 043 SLOPE
99B SLOPE
TOTALIOT400A 20051
MAX LOT MEM 36,289
I MIN LOTAREA= 1, 526

TOTAL HOMES SUMMARY
NAN
TOTAL
ON4O PFRCFNTAGE125% 125$
1 5$ 10007
TENTATNE TRACTMAP NO 37733
S9TEPLAN
N// / yOF A ER7VG

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
SHEET
7OFT
AfffeENG/NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

ACCENT NAMING ATENTRIES
TTE.)
rt=
6R/ W_ RWASPN

LUR/ NAVE

NDSCAPING
TVP.SAWGTIONS)
FUTURE

CITY PARK
INLET

TEPA LOCATIONS)
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans TREES
TREES
C. PLATANUS RACEM05A CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 15 GAL/ AS SHOWN MODERATE UMBBLLULARIACALIPORNICA CALIFORNIA BAY TREE 15 GAL/ AS SHOWN MODERATE SHRUBS
CEANOTHUS' CONCHA' WILD LILAC 5GAL/ 60" O. C. LOW
MUHLENBBRGIACAPILLARIS PINKMUHLY 1 GAL/ 36' 0. C. LOW
RHUSOVATA SUGAR BUSH 5GAL./ AS SHOWN LOW
RIBES SPECIOSUM FLOWERING GOOSEBERRY 5GAL/ 48" O. C. MODERATE SALVIA LEUCANTHA' MIDNIGHT MEXICAN BUSH SAGE 5GAL/ 4B" O. C. LOW

GROUNDCOVERS
MIROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ROSEMARY 1GAL./ 4B' O.C. LOW
BACCHARIS PILULARIS DWARF COYOTE BUSH 1GAL./ 60' 0. C. LOW CASIO PRAEGRACILIS CALIFORNIA FIELD SEDGE 4" POTS/ 24" 0. C. MODERATE isUNCUS PATENS CALIFORNIA GREY RUSH 4" POTS/ 24" O. C. LOW MUNLENBERGIA RICERS DEER GRASS 1 GAL./ 48' 0. 1 MODERATE TREE PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
ACACIASTENOPHYLLA SHOESTRING ACACIA 24" BOX LOW
ARBUTUS ' MARINA' STRAWBERRY TREE 24" BOX MODERATE
CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS WESTERN REDBUD 24" BOX LOW
KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE FLAME TREE 24" BOX MODERATE LAGERSTROEMIA' NATCHEZ' CRAPEMYRTLE 24" BOX MODERATE
MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 24" BOX MODERATE PINUS ELDARICA AFGHAN PINE 24" BOX LOW
PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX MODERATE
ULMUS PARVIPOLIA CHINESE ELM 24" BOX LOW
WQMP PLANT PALETTE:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
TREES
GLEDITSIATRIANCANTHOS HONEY LOCU 15 GAL/ AS SHOWN LOW
SCHINUS MOLLS CALIFORNIA PEPPER 15 GAL/ AS SHOWN LOW
SHRUBS
AGAVE AMERICANA VARIEGATED CENTURY PLANT 15 GAL/ 60" O.0 LOW HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA 5GAL./ 60" O.C. LOW
CEANOTHUS ' CONCHA' WILD LILAC 5GAL/ 60" O.C. LOW
MUHLENBBRGIACAPILLARIS PINKMUHLY 1GAL/ 48" 0. C. LOW
HETEROMELESARBUTIFOLIA T0Y0N 5GAL/ AS SHOWN LOW
SALVIA LEUCANTHA' MIDNIGHT' MEXICAN BUSH SAGE 5GAL/ 48" O.C. LOW

GROUNDCOVERS
CISTUS PORPUREOS PURPLE ROCK ROSE 1 GAL/ 48" 0. C. LOW
LANTANA ' NEW GOLD' NEW GOLD LANTANA 1 GAL/ 48" O.C. LOW ROSMARINUS OPPICINALIS ROSEMARY 1GAL/ 48" QC. LOW

ACCENT PLANTING
BOUGAINVILLEA ' RASPBERRY ICE' RASPBERRY ICE BOUGAINVILLEA 1 GAL/ 48" 0. C. LOW SBNBCIO MANDRALISGB BLUECHALKSTICKS 1 GAL/ 48" O.0 LOW
OPEN SPACE/ PERIMETER PLAN PALETTE:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / SPACING WUCOLS
NOTE: ALL SCE TRANSFORMERS TO BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW WITH LANDSCAPING 410NORTH
rum LP - 10' 40' 80' 160'
SHEET 1 OF 6
TREES
TREE PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS

ACACIA STENOPHYLLA SHOESTRING ACACIA

ARBUTUS ' MARINA' STRAWBERRY TREE

KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA CHINESE PLANE TREE

MAGNOLIAGRANDIFLORA SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA

ULMUS PARVIFOLIA CHINESE ELM
40 2V BOX LOW
24" BOX MODERATE
24" BOX MODERATE
24" BOX MODERATE
24, BOX LOW
M
N
N
O
cao
H
V
W—
a
ra
Z
w
1- 1
LL1W -
a H

DE(IGUGROUP
7- 77 LP - 2NORTH 0' 10' 20' 40'
SHEET 2 OF 6
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans 1 COT

LLM, NAE
D 7r
Ii , ! J r -
B
S, 20, C
4, 24 404A
SmFETB

WQMPBASINLOT
2: 1

DETENTIONBASIN
1 22
WALL AND FENCE LEGEND:

PERIMETER WALL. 6'- 0" HIGH TAN CMU WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE ( ONE SIDE) WITH TAN DECORATIVE WALL CAP.

INTERIOR WALL. 5- 6" HIGH TAN CMU WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE ( ONE SIDE) WITH TAN DECORATIVE WALL CAP.

LOT FENCING. 5' 6" HIGH PRIVACY VINYL FENCE. COLOR TO BE TAN.

S'- 6" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCING

PRECISION FACE CMU RETAINING WALL ( HEIGHT VARIES)
6- 6" HIGH SPLIT FACE PILASTER WITH DECORATIVE CAP
5- 6 TUBULAR STEEL FENCING 5'- 6" TAN VINYL FENCING
5'-4" CMU WALL WITH 2" CAP
NOTE: 000RDINATE 6055 PERIMETER WALL
WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER.
40NORTH

SPLIT FACE BLOCK

PRECISION BLOCK
M
M
M
O
z
H
g
p44
z
Z
zW
wH
W, HS

KM POUP

DIVERSIFIEDPACIFIC
77- 7- 1 LP - 30 40 80'
SHEET 3 OF 6
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PLAN 1 PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
PLAN 2 PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS

TREES TREES TREES
PLAN 3 PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
STREET TREE PER SHEET LP -1 ® STREET TREE PER SHEET LP1 ® STREET TREE PER SHEET LP - 1

SHRUBS / VINRS SHRUBS/ VINES SHRUBS/ VINES
ROMNEVA COULTER] MATILIIA PUPPY IS GAL LOW • CEANOTHUS CONCHA WILDLILAC 15 GAL LOW • ELAEAGNuS PUNG. PRUITLANDD SILVERBERRY IS GAL LOW MUNLSNBERGIA CAP ILLARIS MK MUHLY GRASS SGAL LOW • CALUANDRACAAPORNICA BAIA FAIRY DUSTER SGAL LOW • CALLISTEMON LITTLEJOHN' LAHLEIOHn' BOITLEBROSx SGAL LOW GREVILLEA COASTAL GEM COASTAL CEM GREVILLLA 1GAL LOW • SALVIA LEUCANTHA • MIONIGHT MEXICAN BUSH SAGE 1GAL LOW Q SALVIA POINT SAL SPREADER POINT SAL SPREADER SAGE 1GAL LOW ANIGOZANTHUS' NEN PERRL DWARF RED IWNGAROOPAW 1GAL LOW • TENCRIUMCAAMAEDRVS WALL GERMANDER 1GAL IOW ® LANTANA x' LEMON SWIRL LEMON SWIRL LANTANA IGAL LOW A MACPADTENAUNGUISGATI CATSCLAW 1GAL DM PARIHENUCISSUSTRICUSPIDATA 501505 NT 1GAL MODERATE A 000F00TENADNGDISGATI CAT' S CLAW 1GAL LOW TREES
M. DPDRUMPARVIPOLIUM MVOPDRUM FLATS AT12 0..C. LDW _ DALEA GREG. TRAILING INDIGO BUSH FLATS ATTR DE LOW _ SENECIOMANDRALBGAe BLUE CHALK STICKS FLATS ATIR O. C. LDW 3' MIN. LAYER WOOD MULCH S. MIN. LAYER WOOD MULCH TRAILING INDIGO BUSH PLATS AT 2.r OC LOW 3' MIN, LATER WOOD MULCH PLAN 4 PLANTING LEGEND: PLAN 5 PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
STREET TREE PEA SHEET LPt
SHRUBS / VIN.

ALY00YNEHUEGELII BLUE HIBISCUS 15 GAL

SALVIAGREGGII AUTUMN SAGE SGAL
anus ' SUNSET' ROCXROSE 1GAL
LANTANA SPREADINGSUNSLT SPREADING SUNSET' LANTANA 1GAL
A MACMDTENAUNGUISGATI CATSCLAW 1GAL

OROUNDCOVERS
HUNTIRP¢
T

NGTON CARPET' ROSEMARY
S. MIK LATER WOOD MULCH
PLATS AT 12. 0.C.

TREES

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
STREET IVES PER SHEET LP - 1

SHRUBS/ VINES

O AGAVE DESMSTTIANA TARISGATA' VARIEGATED SMOOTH AGAVE SGAL LOW ANIGOTANTHOS BUSH TANGO ORANGE KANGAROO PAW 5GAL LOW
PARKWAY PLANTING LEGEND:

BOTANIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE/ SPACING WUCOLS
SHRUBS/ VINES • PESTUGAEISRIVOU BUIS SISRIYOU BLUE FESCUE 1GAL LOW LOW • PEIIGASELLOWIANA PINEAPPLE GUAVA 15 GAL MODERATE GROUNOCOVSR5 LOW • WESTRINGIA WYNYABBIE GBP COAST ROSEMARY SGAL LOW
L0W • PHLOMISPRUTICOSA IENUSALSM SAGE 1GAL LOW
ION • CIS US x PURPURSUS ORCHID 500050SE 1GAL LBW
LOW A PARTNENOCISSUS' N000BPIDATA BOSTON IVY IGAL MODERATE

OUNDCOVERS
IOW EACCNAMS PIGEON POINT DWARF COYOTE BRUSH PLATS AT I3 OE. LOW 3' MIN. LAVER WOOD MULCH
BAaxaRIS' PIGEON POINT' DWARF COYOTE BRUSH PUTS ATu• 0C. 40NORTH
M
M
N
N
M
C5
caoz
Z
a
w
IF"
H
z ZO W

DIVERSIFIEDPACIFIC
LP - 47%-7710' 20' 40'
SHEET 4 OF 6
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PLAN 1:

Romneya coulteri
Matilija Poppy
Muhlenbergia capillaris
Pink Muhly Grass
Grevillea ' Coastal Gem'
Coastal Gem' Grevillea
Anigozanthos ' Bush Pearl'
Dwarf Red Kangaroo Paw
Macfadyena unguis- cati
Cat' s Claw
Myoporum parvifolium
Myoporum
PLAN 2:

Ceanothus concha
Wild Lilac
Calliandra californica
Baja Fairy Duster
Salvia leucantha ' Midnight'
Mexican Bush Sage
Teucrium chamaedrys
Wall Germander
Parthenocissus tricuspidata
Boston Ivy
Dalen gregii
Trailing Indigo Bush
PLAN 3:

Elaeagnus pung. ' Fruitlandii'
Silverberry
Callistemon ' Little John'
Little John' Bottlebrush
Salvia ' Point Sal Spreader'
Point Sal Spreader' Sage
Lantana x ' Lemon Swirl'
Lemon Swirl' Lantana
Macfadyena unguis- cati
Cat' s Claw
Senecio mandraliscae
Blue Chalk Sticks
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PLAN 4:

Alyogyne huegelii
Blue Hibiscus
Salvia greggii
Autumn Sage
Cistus ' Sunset'
Rockrose
Lantana ' Spreading Sunset'
Spreading Sunset' Lantana
Macfadyena unguis- cati
Cat' s Claw
Rosmarinus ' Huntington Carpet'
Rosemary
PLAN 5:

Feijoa sellowiana
Pineapple Guava
Westringia ' Wynyabbie Gem'
Coast Rosemary
Phlomis fruticosa
Jerusalem Sage
Cistus x purpureus
Orchid Rockrose
Parthenocissus tricuspidata
Boston Ivy
Baccharis ' Pigeon Point'
Dwarf Coyote Brush

PLANTPHOTOS
SHEET 5 OF 6
AMENITIES INCLUDE:

BBQ FACILITIES

PICNIC TABLES

TOT PLAY AREA

RUBBERIZED WALKING PATH

TURF PLAY AREA

DOG RUN
Dynamo Timber ( ages 2- 5)
Landscape Structures The Peak Climber ( ages 2- 5)
Dynamo Log Balance Course (ages 2-5)
O
H
L;
U
W
Lc
WZ W
DLSI4U6ROUD
LP - 6SHEET 6 OF 6
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans f
f

BY REMARKS

ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LIST
oE .' , 7E , n DI NnDN
Aow x° GrEx
oVOWxxAnu°
o
UN
so RE
Miff INDICATES QUANTITIES SHOWNFORBANGNCIRCUITPURPOSEONLrR MATERIAL rE DUAL cnuor a INDICATES orn E NUMBER t , INDICATES sxen NUMBER TII_ A. FG . AVE FINISHED GRADE
9i' 7
l
1 O
1 F'°
IN 1
f,
2 1 76 Irk
D/
DR.
iii i iii iiia11 of
IthI pflo
i
rfar
iw
ii
ROUND

FIRE ROLE
O D
ND

G SSTANDARD ND

BASE COVER
SDSx ND
wiexAMPEREDGE
73 I Y(' S r 128
1 18NX11 I it,

PARKLOTC,
l 2 1
1 1.0
2 a , ii
6 k!0,-
i
11 0.'
i
r li 7
11 j1
a•
I - I IIITJw.
11 v1 -
G
Ill nlr,
1rr v—
W '_'
I
a IWO

FINISHED GRADE
STREETB 0 R EMI i •
HI EMI
NM
owOMOT
040m) MC
Dog
I
4/1 BASIN 1 4_ DETENTIONBASIN
4,A S
CLEAR
QO, o•
Elpliggirs i;_ l
R
IRIP.

H' 4
eo co o , • I4, w i- n n0
pyo 4
WALKWAY POLE LIGHT FIXTURE ClyLIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE DIVISION 1 OF THESE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
DESCRIPTION uD VOLTS MANUFACTURER CATALOGB MOUNTING

WATTS TYPE
Mr
R+rNVE ; R ' ln A FI.,DRE 50 DN D
M- D - a D--. II-,.- a
Po
POLE 555- 1- 4, 3
17 myi DOMETYPEWODISILDusoTION.

EXTEINTERNAL
LE LED. WALKWAY AREA FORME
sxon SIDE
sD zo
IC
50® cess -sxLco-ur-u-,A-u-xs-
w, c Rss-„- a, 5

PO,LE AT
wrc. I\ II III,,.

North
OVERALL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN _ ED_ O• {
2D
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans OWNER:
10621 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
HOUSINGTRACTNO. 37733RIVERSIDE, CA
Gr
009 809121
Engineering m°.

APPROVED

NO DATE BY REMARKS

SYMBOL LIST,

OVERALL SITE

PLAN, LTG FIXTURE

SCHEDULE AND

DETAILS
DRAWN
CHECKED A.a.c/ a.a.R.

DATE oe/, G/ zo

SCALE AS NOTED
JOB NO. 2593 oe
E- 1. 0
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans 1\l' VER:
10621 Civic Centex Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
HOUSINGTRACTNO. 37733RIVERSIDE, CA
Engineering n.,
800 809- 0223

APPROVED

NO DATE BY REMARKS
hQ44 L J
75 lVWa SRL— LTC
N.
74 4
m t'
I-61 Mk
MI
fa!). 4 i.
b. ..
v
A o
v
i PARK
A
N
4 fa
II
D f fMI
PARK
i
SOT C
2 1 N,
It
W gaina
dam" e.,.,,.,.
m k,;.,.... v..,
A
wA
7 ril
I
1 1
34 3,3
010N. rth
I1I
I 1
In
N. rth
ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1( 1, PHOTOMETRIC ILLUMINATION PLAN( 2J PR - 2020- 000733 (TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit6 - Project Plans 1\ l' VER:
10621 Civic Centex Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
HOUSINGTRACTNO. 37733RIVERSIDE, CA
Engineeringn.,
800 809- 0223

APPROVED

NO DATE BY REMARKS

PARK LIGHTING
AND

PHOTOMETRIC
PLAN
DRAWN
CHECKED e.a.c/ a.).R.

DATE o0e/ 20
SCALE u NOTED
JOB NO. 2593 oe
E- 1. 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

HE NORTHWEST OUARER OF HE SOUTHEAST OLARER OF HE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF SECTION J0, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RAN, 4 REST, SAN BER RD/ NO BASE AND MER/ MAN,

N THE CRY OF R/ DE, COUNTY OF RIVERS// OE, STATE OF CAL/ FORMA, AS SHOWN BY

UN/ TED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY
PARCEL 2.

PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES, OVER AND ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY IS FEET OF THE NORTHEAST WARE, OF THE SOUTHEAST DUARER OF SECTION 30, lO 5 IP 3 SOUR./, RANGE 4 WEST, SIN BERNARD/ NO BASE O MER N.

EXCEPT THEREFROM HE EASTERLY 29500 FEET OF WHICH MOO FEET THEREOF lS IN WOOD ROAD.

PARCEL 3
AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS HE NORTHERLY 15 FEET R THE

NORTHEAST CHARTER OF E SOUTHEAST DNR/ ER OF E SOUTHEAST OWRER OF SECTION 30 TOWNSH/P 3 SOUTH, RANGE 4 NEST, SAN BERNARD/ NO BASE AND MEMO..

EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION 1HEREOF INCLUDED / N WOOD RMC.

AR' 266- 100- 025- 4
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

THE BAS//S OF BEAR/ NG5 SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE C/) Y OF CORONA GPS MONUMENTS NO 1163 OAK MM ( N: 2254570. 060 E 6152363039 AND NC 3036 4/ 505052 1953 ( 7/: 2249760. 701, E 6154840535), BERG N 2712' 10" W.

BENCHMARK:

C/ TY OF RIVERSIDE DESC 1/ON. E8- 03
PK NUL ANO 0, ENG/ NEER TAG / N HE TOP OF HE

SIDEWALK OVER HE EASTERLY WALL OF A GAICH & IS/ N ALONG THE SOUTHERLY CURB OF VAN BUREN BLV D 700 FEET
EASTERLY OF WOOD ROAD.

ELEV. 1644. 96' ( NAD 88)
PROPERTY OWNERSH/ P INFORMATION:

APN 266- 100- 025- 4
10621LUNLAN1, LLCCHAD CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730
EASEMENT NOTES:

ITEMS SHORN HEREON WERE PLOTTED FROM RECORD DATA BASED ON SCHEDULE " B" DOCUMENTS FROM HE CHICAGO TITHE, REPORT NO. 00101949- 966- S01- RT4, DA.

DECEMBER 17, 2018.

ARE NO/CATEDBY A " Q" NR- PLOTTABLEEASEMENTSNMMT£DBYA ARE / A A15' EASEMENTFORAWATERANDPOWERLINESANDHNCDENTALPURPOSESTRICT RECRDED AUGUST 3, 1952 A51N5T N0. 62- 72947, 0R. ( TO REMAIN]
A HNCDENTALPUARPOSESOINFAVOROFOSWHRERND5osN/NED50NDCOMPANYRECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 1970 PER INST.. N0. 70- 14306, O.R. TO BE RELOCATED WITHIN STREET A & STREET e]
A 25' EASEMENT FR A PIPELINES ANO NCDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF Na85N
21286P0W[TOREMA/NJTECOROEDOCTOBER1. 1985PEERINSi. NO 85- 22128& O R. [ TO REMAIN] TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37733
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:

1. TOTAL PROTECT ACREAGE / S 008 AC. ( 1906 GROSS AC.)

ACREAGESUMMARYEM RFAGF
A. LOT GROSS AREA 551
B. ORA/NAGE ( WOW EAS/ N) O.B3
PAC, SLOPES/OPENSPACE0 RKS 045047E. ROW TO ROW 1.82
F. ROW OED/ GT/ ON ( OBS'/ MAN 0. 98

R AND LUR/ N AVE)
4FRCFNTX8XEX4X5XBS10% 2. EX/ SPNG GENERAL PUN DES/ L'NATlON: CDR- LOW OEN9TY RODENT ( 3- 6 00/ 40)

3. EXISTINGION/NG: RA -SPRES00'
0L

AGR/ CULTURAL AND
SPECIRC PLAN ( ORANGECREST) OVERLAY 20555

4. PROPoSED20N/NG' PERORANGE -CRESTSP, 50CANBEDEVELOPED TO R- 1- 130' 00 UPON CANCELUOFPON WOODCREST ACR/ CULTURAL PRESERVE NO 3
PROPoSED NO. R DWELL/ NG UN/ TS. 41 LOTS.
6 PROPOSED PRD/ ECT DENSITY 406 DU/ A0
7 M/N/MUM LOT S/ZE. 5115 50 FT

8. AVERAGE LOT SIE.' 5, 856 SO. FT,
70N/ NO OF SURROUND/. PROPER, R- 1- 13000
IO. AIERAGE NATURAL SLOPE R S/ E 507X
TYP/ CAL LOT SETBACKS LEGEND:

SETBACK / NFORMAT/ ON.•
IREW -t -MAL11..71. -62Setbacks rom inject Ponmeten
Same as base zone. Tle setback shall
be Fully la/ xtapedaM no fences°.
wall, shall be pemiltecl teener*
AdjeCent 10 Public Streetintothe setback.

AAjetent to Perimeter
Hier, OnesSetbacMcWithInPre, aBoumarlesBAaybemodifiedInnNu Mon.: 11. e PRM rant Yard Setback
Side yard Setback S ft
Pear,. Setback
Single family Ile ... I Base Ewes
arllel. setba sAd aceblit Street

4.1-61AcreA front ES ft.

C. Rear

EXST/ NG WATER
EX/ ST/NG SEW£

EX/ SING RECLAIMED WATER

EX/ ST/ NO SIORA/ DRAIN

PROPOSED WALL
1200—= EXIST/ NG CONTOUR 8EVADON
1200—= PROPOSED SURFACE ELfVABON
13783 = PROPOSED PAD ELEVARON
ETEV. = ELEWARON
FG = R / s/ GRIDS

FL - ' YOWL/ NE
FS = FTN/SHED SURFACE
D.G. = DECOMPOSED GRAN. -
L= =
LENGTHMOTHN/NUNPL = PROPR505' 01OF' L/ ER/ W - RIGHT WAY GB = GRADE BREAK

TOP R CURB
45 = Lor NUMBER
1 1 TOETOPOF
SLOPEOPEo DAYLIGHT UNE

DECORAPVE PAVEMENT
66' MINOR ST.

Nor TO SCALE
LUR/N AVE OBS/DIAN DR.

13. 56'
OX
18 56' PRIVATE ST

6. NOTCOSTRCALFEET

VANBURENBLVD

NRAMFRIA AVE

SRO ECT
Sl TE
a

LURIN AVE

MARIPOSA AVE
8 NANDINA AVE
8 VICINITY MAP
OWNER/ DEVELOPER:

LURIN LAND 1
10621 CICECENDR/ V
05RANCHO CUCAMONGA M 91730
CONTACT. NOLAN LEGG/ O
ENG/ NEER:

C ENGINEERS 1860 COMPTON
AVENUE CORONA CA 92881- 3370
951) 734- 2130 CONTACT
MAT/ HEW LAN/ NOV/ CH, P. E
UT/ L/ TY NOTES:

SEWER & WATER'
GAS,'
SCHOOL OISTR/ CI`

WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER OSIR/ CT

SOCA( GAS

SOUTHERN CAL/ FORMA LD/ SON

RIVERS/ DE UNIFIED SCHOOL O/ SIRICT

STATEMENT OF PREPARER
HEREBY STATE THAT TH/5 MAP WAS EARED UNDER

MY SUPERV/ S/ ON ANO NAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS

WONTED, OF AND CONSENTS ID HE FIL NO OF THS MAP
AATTHEW L LAN/NONCH PE.

DATE
TTM DATE IDENMFlER
TENTATNE 7R4CTAMP NO 977.' 4
7R4CTMAP
V// / OF /] TIERS/ L/C
PAEPA419. 7 FOR

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
SHEET
1 OF2
AfffeENG/NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans NUMBERED LOTS:
102110. GROSSMEANSOFT. Paw.. OpenSpace50,FT. WIDTH ODEMI1021NO. SLOPE 61105611881116SOFT. MWMOpenSp....Sp....

IDD. W IO OF
20,57436289
5245 849 sr

SLOPE/ CONSERVATION
24 5115 83s3•
5 2, 999
2 5617
MMLOTARFA= 36, 289
25 5118 1065sa
5647 948 55' 6926 6552 2. sa
4 5658 1071 55' 27 7679 3561 511 15V
5 5671 1244 55' SOY 20 5366 1129 53• 105'
6 5651 1021 55' 103' 29 1163 52. 107
7 55055a' 100' 7238 20. 51'
8 5872 954 SG 103' 31 6963 1130 51• 137
9 6266 860 55' 100' 30 7110 1571 52' 135
10 5949 686 50 115' 33 5748 1058 52' 10
11 W 8
13 5871 537 SO 111• 35 5393 1333 53' 105•
13 5854 669 SO 117 36 5393 746 52' 05'
U 5834 719 W117 37 5393 892 52• 105•
15 5922 509 SO 38 5394 798 Si' los•
16 5872 SO117. 5395 1258 SE' 105•
1] 18 6. 1475 1. 41 4768 826 10E
19 5670 1637 5.7 105' AVERME 5826 1, 140 53 113
5671 1428 s4' 105' 1101701. 0281. 4 238, 875
22 44. 1379 105. MINIMUM 10226214= 4, 768
23 6895 1727 61 1.08.

PARK/ OPEN SPACE
LOT Slaf7
LOT T. 10. 374
7071( 24514
1106X348S0% 20.500
50'

IDLE /N FEET

LUR/ N LAND PRD
Lurin Land PRD
Superior Design)
TTM 37733 9. 09
Units/ACZoningPercentageaCreSLots4/11/3
Total LotsAllowed 18
LL// ERED LOTS:

LOT.

S..
1105[ 11102101

GROSSAREA IN
A 3, 255 SLOPE
526 SLOPE
CO 20,57436289 SPACE

WOMP BASIN
E 5366SLOPE/CONSERVATION
40 3 EASEMENTSLOPE5 2, 999 SLOPE

TOTAL LOT MD-
MMLOTARFA= 36, 289
MIX LOT MEA- 1, 526
Lurin Land PRD
Benchmark Design
TTM 37733
Acres

9. 09
Percentage acres Lots
1025 03. 63
Total Lots Allowed AIM
NOTE. ACREAGE NOW, EXCLUDES THE R/ OHN OF WAY , L RN A. O O95D N OR. 094 0315 IDE722111FIER
1 11/ 23/ 20 BY ML
1 11/ 23/ 20
TENTAME 7R4CTAMP NO 37733
TR4CTMAP

CITY OIFHNERS/ DE
H27A419. 7FOR

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
Too'
150M554, 4150 SHEET
2 OF2

ENG/ NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PROJECT NOTES:

I ALL % PROVEMENIS SHALL BE PER SCHEDULE A' SUB...

D/NANCE460DIL (2007) PACE746FaAsALL CUT SLOPES WILL BE 21 RAO AND FILL SLOPES . 91, UNLESSOOF SHAT. 4.

LOT
06/E OFSCONESSHALLON
HICLAI
TOCBC2016S/ONs. STREET74E8/415SHOWNHEREON /NauvEO/NENsraNsr0SIREETWATER • ALL WATER OUAUTY FOR 171/6 TRACT 5 BEY. N/ TMaTEO BY ON - 5/)£ AMPS BlO— RETENTION BASINS'

7. OWNER., DASWN ',TAP, OF1., LMAPINCLUDESDIEENURECRCCUOUSO E SH/ P OF f ( ANO OMOER B PROPERTY 5 NOT LOCATED / N A FLOODPLAIN.

9. PROPERLY /5NOTLOCATESUBS/ D IN A
SACTIR
E. ZON

10. PROPERLY / S NOT LOCATED / N A AREA

PROPERTYCONTAINSNOKNOWNWELLSCE
11TA.PERlSNOTINAFAULTZONEORONAFAULTLINE. 1J. THE PROJECT / 5BW/ TH/N COP CL/ TY ZONE D OF THF MARCH NR RESERVEVE 8AS0.SE% N O PORT A/4PRT CQNP CB/ VIY PIAN
14 SETBACKS TO ALL SITE BOUNOAR/ ES WILL COMPLY WITH Na 1016 BASIS OF BE4R/ NGS.•

THE BASIS R BEAR/ NOS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF CORONAGPSMONUMENTSNO1183OAK0H3 (A22545]9060, 56152363939 AND O. 3039 ONOSON 2 1953 ( 1) 2249760 701, 6154840535). 6E/ 7/0 N 2712707 It

BENCHMARK,
CITY OF R/ VER5/ OE DESICNACON EB - 03
NAIL AND 0// 6 ENGNE, TAG / N E TOP OF THE
SIDEWALK OVER THE EASTERLY WALL OFA . 7. BASIN ALO.

THE SOUTHERLY CURB R VAN BUR, Br. AND 700 FELT
EASTERLY OF WOOD ROAD.
42E19 164096' r D
PROPERTY OWNERSH/ P INFORMATION:

APR: 266- 109- 025- 4
URINNDCiERDRIVERANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
SETBACK / NFORMAT/ ON:

IRA. R-1-MlAc11:07-M2I
kbaaentto Pudiesreet
Sanwa base zone.. setback shall
Into Me setback.

A.BacenttoPerimetertines 71A, Isetbacks Within flojecteoundaRes...., x MOdifieain mryumionwxnmevRol
Front Yard se..

Side Vaal Setback
Pear Yard Settlatk 1514.
singe -family ResidentialBassboas
Buil ng aclo. arenttoPotlieareet
14/42AcreA. Front
c. Rea MIL Rk

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:

I. 707 PRLLECr ACREAGES 008 AG ( 1006 GROSS 40)
ACREAGESUMMARYZEAL acsaa
A LOT GROSS AREA 551
B / AAGE ( WO. BAS/ N) 083
SC. LOPES/ OPLN SPACE 0. 45
O. PARKS 0. 47
E ROW TO ROW 181
F. ROW DEDICAPON ( was. 4V 0. 98

DR O LUR/ N AVE)
PERCENT5.7B$
5$ 18$ 10$
EX/ SPD GENERAL PLAN DES/ GNATXMf CDR— LOW DENSITY
ES/ DENTLAL (3- 6 011/40)

3. EX/ SCD ZON/ G' RA— SP RES/ DEAGR/ CUL. RA AND
5, 0. 0 PUN ( ORNGECREST) OVERLAY ZONES

4. PROPOSED ZON/ NG: PER ORANGECREST SP, SITE CAN BE
DEVELOPED TO R- 1- 13000 UPON . NCELLACON OF IYOODCREST AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE O. 3
6 PROPOSED NO OF DWELL/ NG UN/ 15 41 LOTS
6 66060500 PROJECT 0. 10/ 119 006 00/ 40
7 WMUM LOT SIZE 6116 SO FT.

AVERAGE LOT 5/ZE. 5, 656 50. FT.

9. ZONING OF SURROUNDING PROPER, R- 1- 13000

10. AUERAGE NATURAL SLOPE R 5/ T£.' 50.

TYP/ CAL LOT SETBACKS LEGEND:
22 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

PARCEL 1:

THE 008I704E57 QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTF9 OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECCON 30, TOWNSHIP 3 SON ; RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BER RD/ NO BA5AND THE C. OF R/ ERS6, COUNTY OF RIVERS/ DE STA. OF CAUFORN/ D A5 SHOWNONN BY7

UNITED STATES' GOVERNMENT SURVEY
PARCEL 2 -
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES, OVER AND ACROSS THE SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF 1HE nom., OLLATER OF THE SOUTHUST QUARTER OF SECA. 30, TOWNSH/P 3 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARD/NO BASE ANO MEW...

EXCEPT THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 29600 FEET OF WECH 2000 FEET THEREOF 5 / N WOOD ROAD.

PARCEL 3
AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURPOSES OVER AND ACROSS THE NOR ELY 15 FEET OF E NORTH., QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUART, OF SECCON 30. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARD/ NO BASE AND MER/ OLA.

EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION 1 EREOF INCLUDED / N WOOD ROAD.

APA: 266— I09- 015- 4
UTILITY NOTES.

SEWER 64 WATER.

GAS
ELECTRIC/ l.

SCHOOL DISTRICT

WESTERN MUNIC/ PAL WATER , STR/ CT
SOCAL . 5

SOU E N CAL/ FORN/ A ED/ SON
RIVERS/ DE UN/ ED SCHOOL D51RCT
66' MINOR ST.

SalLE
LURKn65065/0.906
EXST/ D WAD.

EXIST/ NO SEWER

EX/ SONG RECLAIMED WATER

EX/ ST/ NG STORM DRAIN

PROPOSED WALL

PROPOSED HYDRANT
0—= EX/ SCD CONTOUR ELEVATION
1200—= PROPOSED SURFACE ELEVADON
13763 — PROPOSED PAD ELEYADON
REA = ELEYADON
FG = PN/ SH RAE
FL — LLOxz/ E
FS — FIN/ SHED SURFACE
O.G. = DECOMPOSED GRANITE
L= =
LENGTHONN/NUMPL = PRL/ E
8/ 19 — RIGH// T7 07OF WAY
GB = GRADE BREAK
1C TOP R CURB
45 = LOT NUN.?
11 TOTOPEOFSLOPEOF SLOPE

DAYLIGHT LINE
U 000884TH£ PAVEMENT
OR
II 55 MAX
544500
EXS/ RPoP., ®.
6' MEANOEF
PCCCU, QGU1TR
60' H/ GH TAN CNU WALL,

SPLIT FACE ONE SIDE W/ CJ

DECORACVE CAP
65' HIGH TAN CMU WALL,

SDT FA, ONE SIDE WITH
E
8711.
56' PRIVATE ST
NOTCOLCA, L£T
VPNBURENBL.

KRAMER, AAVE
PROJECT...,
Sl TE a
14AWP952 AVE
47,

MAMA AVE

LURIN AVE

VICINITY MAP
OWNER/ DEVELOPER:

LUR/ N LAND 1, LLC
10621 C/ V/C CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91730
CONTACT' NOL4N LEGG.

ENG/ NEER:

K. ENGINEERS 1880 COMPTOV
VENUE CORONA, 91881- 3370
951) 734- 2130 0000. 4 T.'

MATTHEW UN/ ONCH PE

STATEMENT OF PREPARER
HEREBY STATE THAT TH/s MAP was EARED UNDER

MY SUPERVISION O THAT THE OWNER OF RECORD HAS
KNOWLEDGE R AND CONSENTS TO THE F/ L NG OF TH5 MAP
MATTHEW L LAN/NONCH PE.

DATE
DA 941E,a9F, I1F1EeR
1 „//= o BY ML
1 11/ 23/ 20
TENTATNETRACT A1APM J 37133
G9ADa4G PLAN
C/ TYOFHNEfE

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
PRIS. A 159 1T
SHEET
1 OF3

ENG/ NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans AO V in aillik
I
11111111k r PROF' ERIY 60UNL'
orira / ®
w
Y
j _ n
1a
lig ®.:. . I
IIIv
i a
V 0
N IYa
19 („ 1D `
Es
r1Pi 1 ' , o r Jn.
h,
r
aa 1 o
x
llsll/ _
11 diL ,
k 6
az=
Ii M/ M- s n s
J
Wli oM
n iii\ o
Iii
SO' Lx
SCALE / N FEE!
7ENTATNE TRACT MAP AK). 37733
GRADk4G PL4N
C/ TYOFHNEfE
H27A419. 7PO4

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
P/7554, 4150
SHEET
2OF3

ATNENG/NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans OBS/ DHN DR.

Er.. RA, r DY PROP.

TS' M/ N
BLOC. SETBACK
R sracrrC RX
RP - OT15
c snccaau o%/
fyloi-

PROPOSED
SEC770N A - A GROUND
SCALE 1`= 40'
085/ OHN OR
PROPOSEDWALL/ H=D' 17320' TW SECI70N B - B
726. 0' FC
LL

AIN BLOB

SETBACK
TLOT47290
wALL
LOT 402
PA0- 1713. 8
SCALE 1 = 40'
82/ 01/
O WALL
60' R/ W SraELT B
1721. 0. TW 4. 5"
1715. 0' FG
le
OT 3

GK/ CHT

UMRS OF GRAO/ NG

SECT/ ON C - C
SCALE 1"= 40"
PROPOSED WALL ay,
17/ 50' TW
1] 09. 0" FC
012.408SASNearc
LL
SEC710N 0- 0
SCALE 1, 40'

PROPOSED WALL

5. 5" BNDY
17119" 1W PROPOSEDWRLC & R/w17124' FC H= 6. 0
1702. 9' FG

DETE NON BAS/ N
7/ 00.0 ear 9

OERNT/ ON BAS/ N
SEC770N E - E
SG, /"= 40'
SCALE 1". 40"
SEC770N 0- C
SCALE 1 x- 40'
SEC770N H - H
OAK/ BHT SCALE 1, 40'

LAW' S OF GRAD/ NC
mc/ca/rLAOS DF AD/ Nc
SEC770N 8- 8
SCALE 1"- 40"
40' 0 80' x

SCALE / N FE,
7ENTATNE TRACT MAP AK). 37733
C RAD%//
ICS/
M? PPL4N

V/ O SVG
H27A419. 7FOR

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
PR551115000
SHEET
AWO 3OF3

ENG/ NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

DEMOLITION PLAN
LEGEND:

E ST/ ND WA R

EN/ SUNG SEWER

EXISPNC RECLAIMED WATER

EXIST/ NC STORM ORA/ N
1200-= NC CONTOUR ELEVAPON
LOT NIS - LOT Nu BER

TOE OF SLOPE

TOP OF SLOPE

LAK/ GHT UNE

I SIM/ CR/ RE TO BE REMOVED

CONCRETE TO BE REMOVED
50' 50'

SCALE IN FEET
TIM DATE IDENT1FlER
TENTATNE TR4CTUlf' M7 37733
TR4CTMAP

CITY OIFRNERS/ DE
H27A419. 7FOR

LURIN LAND, LLC
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
IgG'
150MPA. 110 SHEET
1OF1

ENG/ NEERS SHEETS
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Architecture Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite200Irvine, 92810
9ll
851. 2133

LURIN - OBSIDIAN

APPLICANT

DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC COMMUNITIES
10621 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91130
TEL: 909. 481. 1150
DiverslflW Pacific Communities
10821 Civic
CRanchoCucamonga. CA91)30

RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA

ARCHITECT CIVIL

I(TGY GROUP
11911 VON KARMAN AVE.

IRVINE, CA 92614
TEL: 949. 951. 2133

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA e 201gAleg
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dale'. 06. 23. 2020

I(WC ENGINEERS
1880 COMPTON AVENUE STE 100
CORONA, CA 92881
TEL: 951. 734. 2130
A nine
17911 Von Karman Ave,
uite2009261459veomA3
Diversified Pacific Communities
10521 Civic Center Drive.

Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside, CA 2019 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans P Date: 06 23 2020

SHEET INDEX

ARCHITECTURE
A0. 1

COVER SHEET

INDEX SHEET

01. 0 STREET PERSPECTIVE
A2. 0 PLAN I FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLAN
A2. I PLAN I ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS
A2. 2 PLAN I ' B' ITALIANATE ELEVATIONS
A2. 3 PLAN I ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATIONS

03. 0 PLAN 2 FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLAN
A3. I PLAN 2 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS
A3. 2 PLAN 2 ' B' ITALIANATE ELEVATIONS
A3. 3 PLAN 2 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATIONS

04. 0 PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS
A4. 0a PLAN 3 FLOOR PLAN OPTION & ROOF PLAN
A4. I PLAN 3 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS
A4. I. a PLAN 3 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A4. 2 PLAN 3 ' B' ITALIANATE ELEVATIONS
A4. 2. a PLAN 3 ' B' ITALIANATE ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
A4. 3 PLAN 3 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATIONS
A4. 3. a PLAN 3 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ENHANCED ELEVATIONS

05. 0 PLAN 4 FLOOR PLANS
A5. 0a PLAN 4 ROOF PLAN
A5. I PLAN 4 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS
A5. I. a PLAN 4 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A5. 2 PLAN 4 ' B' ITALIANATE ELEVATIONS
A5. 2. a PLAN 4 ' B' ITALIANATE ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
A5. 3 PLAN 4 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATIONS
A5. 3. a PLAN 4 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A6. 0 PLAN 5 FLOOR PLANS
A6. 0a PLAN 5 ROOF PLAN
A6. I PLAN 5 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ELEVATIONS
A6. I. a PLAN 5 ' A' SPANISH SANTA BARBARA ENHANCED ELEVATIONS A6. 2 PLAN 5 ' B' ITALIANATE ELEVATIONS
A6. 2. a PLAN 5 ' B' ITALIANATE ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
A6. 3 PLAN 5 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ELEVATIONS
A6. 3. a PLAN 5 ' C' CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW ENHANCED ELEVATIONS SHEET INDEX A0. 1
11M
PLAN 5B
Architecture 0 Planning
17911 Von Kann. Ave.

SuDe200A926140851. 3
t. corn
PLAN1A
Diversified Pacific Communities

1. 21 Civic Center Drive.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
PLAN4C

LURIN LAND
Riverside, CA 7e9
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PLAN 2B
Plot Date: 06 23 2020
PLAN 3A PLAN5C

STREET SCENE
NORTH OF OPEN SPACE VIEWING SOUTH A1.0
4: 12 4: 12
4: 12 4: 12
4: 12
ROOF PLAN ( Spanish Santa Barbara - A type)
OVERHANG: 12" Eave; 0" Rake
ROOF PITCH : 3. 5: 12 & 4: 12
r
40,_ 0"
MIS
0 MASTERBEDROOM
OPTIONALCALIF. RM. ATSELECTED LOTS
ti
Jl lI VIII iI I I
IIIIJiiilliil SII
LIVING
DI NG
I
1312 x13- 2'
rr2£ 2-
21-rrr
rrWALL
LAUNOR
GARAGE I 1
201- 11X 22, 111 1
I \
11I 1 I 1
I 1 I 1
L
ER
3 droom 2. 5 0th
O MIN. LOT SIZE
L
6 50
Architecture Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000

1. 923109.ktgyconn
Dlverslfleg Pacific Communities
10621 Civic Center
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91230

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA it 21119-0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dare: 08. 18. 2020
1 1- rrL
c> J
OHO
BEDRf0'
e
LfEA1J
SCALE: 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 a
J
PLAN I

SINGLE STORY
P1 - GROSS SF
TOTAL WING tete SO. ET.

GARAGE
A2.0
MATERIAL LEGEND © Stucco Recess
0 Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) 0 RecessedFaux DiamondGableVent Q Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile 0 Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Baranca a Stucco over Foam Eave a Vinyl Windows
e Stucco Sill Trim + n Exposed Truss Tails at Eaves
a Stucco over Foam Surround Decorative Fiber Cement Shutter Panel E Stuccoover FoamColumn
E StuccoArched Soffit
Stucco over Foam Corbel
s Stucco Battered Wall
e Fiberglass Entry Doors
Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address
0 o Q
E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
0 OptionalMan Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.
uite20092014a9YcomA3

RIGHTELEVATION
Diversified Pacific Communities
DIVERVIEOPACirRancM10Cucamonga, CA91730 LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Plot Dale: 06. 18. 2020

IOC MA' AM,
er0 TT"
Sole: 161'660'

REARELEVATION
PLAN 1A ELEVATIONS

SPANISH SANTA BARBARA
MATERIAL LEGEND © Circular Shape Stucco 0/ Foam Gable Trim + z Stucco Column Base E+ Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) r Stucco o/ Foam Eave ' a Stucco 0/ Foam Window Trim Surround n Concrete " S" Profile Roof Tile E Stuccoo/ FoamGable Pediment '° Stucco over Foam Window Sill a Barrel Concrete Roof Tiles at Ridges E Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround ' a Stucco over Foam Pot Shelf Trim Precast Concrete Roof Finial '° Stucco o/ Foam Column +] o Stucco Recess / Reveal ( Where Occurs) 0 Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End r+ StuccoArch ++ Vinyl Windows with Muntins a Tile Paver Cap at (Low Wall) Pot Shelf
Ee FiberglassEntryDoor
Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address Sign
zEi Metal Sectional Garage Door
Optional Man Door
TEIE

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Archllectura a Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.
200
94Ina9A 3ktgy om

RIGHTELEVATION
DIVEX483naCikticDlv21CronPacificCommunitiesCenter
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91230

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA a 2019- 0233
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dalai 08. 18. 2020 sda: 1111- I

REARELEVATION
PLAN 1B ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A2.2
MATERIAL LEGEND © 2x6 Wood Barge Board
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Fiber CementSquareColumns En FlatConcreteShingleRoof (No RakeTile) Ee Fiber CementTop o/ LowWall Ea BarrelConcreteTilesat Hip andRidge Ea 206 Window Trim Surround E< 6x8 WoodOutlooker E° 204WindowSill
Ea Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins E+ 2x10HorizontalWoodSiding E 20120/ 2x4 VerticalSiding ' a Metal Sectional Garage Door 1e 2x3WoodSidingEndCaps ' a Optional Man Door
E° 6x8 CanopyWoodAngelBracketw/ 4x6 Beam
E FiberglassEntryDoors
Ea Decorative Exterior Lights & Raised Address
2x4 0/ 206 head Trim over Garage Door
3 1

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
1111111111111111 1111111lla
Archllectura a Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.
200
94Ina9A4128143ktgy om

RIGHTELEVATION

4.1DIVEX488naCikticDlv21CronPacificCommunitiesCenter
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91230

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA a 2019- 0239
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dalai 08. 18. 2020 de: 1/11- 1

REARELEVATION
PLAN 1C ELEVATIONS

CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW
1011Architecture Planning
17911 Von Kamlan Ave.

Suite20920140
3 comktg
4: 12 4: 12
RIDGE
4: 12
JP
w
4: 12
Fy
c9
ROOF PLAN ( Spanish Santa Barbara - A type)
OVERHANG : 12" Eave ; 0" Rake
ROOF PITCH : 3. 5: 12 & 4: 12
Dlversifieg Pacific Communities
10821 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga. CA SIM

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 21119-0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans r r
1/
iII,
IIILiI, IIII IIID -Q =
T 1T
40-Q" I I t
f iu. DRV
GARAGEDr-On /
ll//till_lull/2,r_ l//till//till. 3 Bedroom, 3 Bah
pl MIN. LOT SIZE
50 Plot Dale: 06. 18. 2020
OPTIONALCALIF. RM. ATSELECTED LOTS
SCALE: 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 4
PLAN 2

SINGLE STORY
P2 - GROSS SF
TOTAL LIVING 1919 SOFT
GARAGE SO. FT.

A3.0

MATERIAL LEGEND
E+ Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30)
M Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile
a Stucco over Foam Eave
Stucco Sill Trim
a Stucco over Foam Surround
E StuccoRecess
Ei Recessed Faux Diamond Gable Vent
Ea Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Baran.
a Vinyl Windows
e Exposed Truss Tails at Eaves
Decorative Fiber Cement Shutter Panel
0 0112000over FoamColumn
a Stucco Arched Soffit
Stucco over Foam Corbel
s Stucco Battered Wall
e Fiberglass Entry Doors
Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address
Metal Sectional Garage Door
e Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecturea Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.
20092814949 A 3ktgy om

RIGHTELEVATION
DI0o0/n0c0 DiversifiedPacificCommunities
Rancho Cucamoinga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA N 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dara: 08. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 2A ELEVATIONS

SPANISH SANTA BARBARA
MATERIAL LEGEND © CircularShape Stuccoo/ FoamGableTrim 0 StuccoColumnBase E+ Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Ei Stucco 0/ Foam Eave '' Stucco o/ Foam Window Trim Surround n Concrete " S Profile Roof Tile Ja Stucco o/ Foam Gable Pediment © Stucco Over Foam Window Sill a Barrel Concrete Root Tiles at Ridges s Stucco 0/ Foam Entry Porch Surround ' s Stucco over Foam Pot Shelf Trim e Precast Concrete Roof Finial El Stuccoo/ FoamColumn ' a Stucco Recess / Reveal ( Where Occurs) a Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End +E+ StuccoArch ' r Vinyl Windows with Munfins a Tile Paver Cap at ( Low Wall) Pot Shelf
E FiberglassEntryDoor
zgo Decorative Ext. Lights 8 Raised Address Sign
zEi Metal Sectional Garage Door
I] OptionalMan Door
p aar / tuy: lgs ya
V'4MIOSIR1t12li:l11fffgyp( nlipr,alr orq+ywq?1fy ny
aY11944:41 (*APhatR)III'

LEFTELEVATION
Archllactura a Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.
200
94Ina3A328143ktgy om

RIGHTELEVATION
DI „ ryEppA<pIC' DiversifiedPacificCommunities
Rancho Cucamoinga. CA 91230

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA 32019- 0239
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

FRONTELEVATION
PIM Dara: 08. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 2B ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A3.2
MATERIAL LEGEND © 2x6 Wood Barge Board
E+ Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Ei Fiber Cement Square Columns M FletConcreteShingleRoof (NoRakeTile) a FiberCementTopo/ LowWall a Barrel Concrete Tiles at Hip and Ridge s 206 Window Trim Surround 6x8 Wood Outlooker 2x4 Window Sill
a Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins + E+ 2x10HorizontalWoodSiding O 2x120/ 2x4 VerticalSiding ' a Metal Sectional Garage Door 2x3 Wood Siding End Caps ' a Optional Man Door
6x8 Canopy Wood Angel Bracket w/ 4x6 Beam
a Fiberglass Entry Doors
a Decorative Exterior Lights & Raised Address
2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trim over Garage Door
Ill ll/ lli'
lfll'
if I ICI', III'

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture a Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.
200
94Ina9A928143ktgy om

RIGHTELEVATION
IDI F0OrccI:IC' plvarslae4PaciecCommunitiesn' "`-"'
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA N 201. 1789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dalai 08. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 2C ELEVATIONS

CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW
Architecture a Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave
Sure2000

1. 933149.ktgycorn
MASTER

BEDROOM
Cr)
BATH 2
BE SRO13M-
02 11111,
III in I ai TIIP11
mam
BATHR
IIIIINIIIIIIIuliluIllsT Itl mI1I1L
LOFT/ OPT. BEDRM414- 0" x 14- 0.

Second Floor
MIN. LOT0 ¢E
Diversified Pacific Communities
10621 Civic Drive,
Rancho Cucamoinga. CA. 230
BELOW

ROOF BELOW
7 LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA i/ 21119-0769
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans 4a - O•

KITCHEN

OPTIONAL
CALIF. SELLCIEULUIS
GARAGE 1
ii31' S x2g'</1I
I it
1 I
MMMK
lI

II LIVING
T- O' x 15' 8
First Floor
4 Bedroom 3. 5 Bath
PORCH
III99rliglllplllpl' 91p!glNI'. II11I11111 III IIII
7 3i-oRi1Mzz
1 of MIrn' 50,9SIZE
50 PIM Dare: 96. 16. 2020
SCALE 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 4
PLAN 3

TWO STORY
J
P3 - GROSS SF
1ST FLOOR 125260,
D FLOOR 1194 SO, FF.

MAURIINE 255850. FT.

GARAGE
A4.0
Architecture Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave
Sure2000

1. 923149.ktgyconn

3. 5: 12
RIDGE

3. 5: 12
r

3. 5: 12
RIDGE

3. 5: 12
r

3. 5: 12
ROOF PLAN ( Spanish Santa Barbara - A type)
OVERHANG : 12" Eave ; 0" Rake
ROOF PITCH : 3: 12 & 3. 5: 12
DlverslgeJ Pacific Communities
10621 Civic Drive,
Rancho Cucamoinga. CA 91230

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

I MIMASTERBEDROOM
1 uuilulpiil uulo u tiltlIliliIGT. tlili I'I!IPy91ppp
1 BZ-OO1Vo.

I. = I=
LAUNDRYL4

I ROOFBELOW
ITNI

IIIN III
111111
r
L J
PIM Dare: 08. 13. 2020
SCALE: 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 4
PLAN 3
OPT. BEDRM 4 A4.0a
MATERIAL LEGEND © Stucco Recess g Stuccoover FoamColumn El Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Q RecessedFaux DiamondGableVent E StuccoArched Soffit Q Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile Q Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Baranoa © Stucco over Foam Corbel a Stucco over Foam Eave a Vinyl Windows ' e Stucco Battered Wall Q Stucco Sill Trim + e Exposed Truss Tails at Eaves , Ee FiberglassEntryDoors a Stucco over Foam Surround ++ Decorative Fiber Cement Shutter Panel '' Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address a Metal Sectional Garage Door
a Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecturea Planning
17911 Von Kennon Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu09VOCDlvarslfieJPen
eic
CnmmuntliesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA ir 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dale: 06. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3A ELEVATIONS

SPANISH SANTA BARBARA

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND © Stucco Recess g Stuccoover FoamColumn El Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Q RecessedFaux DiamondGableVent E StuccoArched Soffit Q Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile Q Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Barenxa © Stucco over Foam Corbel a Stucco over Foam Eave a Vinyl Windows ' a Stucco Battered Wall Stucco Sill Trim + e Exposed Truss Tails at Eaves 1EeFiberglass Entry Doors a Stucco over Foam Surround ++ Decorative Fiber Cement Shutter Panel '' Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address a Metal Sectional Garage Door
a Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecturea Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
illDIVERS,. 10621fleaCivicCenterCommunitiesCRanchoCucamonga. CA91730 LURIN LAND Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dale: 06. 18. 2820 olr. 1/1= e"

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3A ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SANTA BARBARA A4.I. a
MATERIAL LEGEND E CircularShape Stuccoo/ FoamGableTdm g StuccoColumnBase E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Stuccoo/ FoamEave
E Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Stuccoo/ FoamGable Pediment E Barrel ConcreteRoofTilesat Ridges E Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround E PrecastConcreteRoofFinial E Stuccoo/ FoamColumn
E Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End ++ Stucco Arch
E Stuccoo/ FoamWindowTrim Surround
E StuccoOverFoamWindowSill
E Stuccoover FoamPotShelfTrim
E Stucco Recess /Reveal (WhereOccurs)
M VinylWindowswith Muntins
Ea Tile PaverCapat (Low Wall) PotShelf
E FiberglassEntryDoor
0 DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress Sign
E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION
I. A3... _. a. a} 4 • oa 11.445, rid 84 4. u... aa. rylloraa..

FRONTELEVATION
Architecture t Planning
17911 Von Kennon Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu09RC0Cplv.2ril Peneinmmun"iesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA ir 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Pale: 06. 18. 2820

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3B ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A4.2

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTdm
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND E CircularShape Stuccoo/ FoamGableTd
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Stuccoo/ FoamEave
E Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Stuccoo/ FoamGable Pediment E Barrel ConcreteRoofTilesat Ridges E Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround E PrecastConcreteRoofFinial E Stuccoo/ FoamColumn
E Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End ++ Stucco Arch
m g StuccoColumnBase
E Stuccoo/ FoamWindowTrim Surround
Stucco over Foam Window Sill
E Stuccoover FoamPotShelfTrim
E Stucco Recess /Reveal (WhereOccurs)
M VinylWindowswith Muntins
Ea Tile PaverCapat (Low Wall) PotShelf
E FiberglassEntryDoor
0 DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress Sign
E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
Optional Man Door
fit :, i+, Ila 40u61l

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
rt\ IJ#..+... rta _ t/ tiP,. J At akknuli .., l. t.' lite.^ t t_... t A0iilt. nt ta.. redd,% Pt.

Architecture a Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
012 µn40500010DlvarelfieaPen
eic
CnmmuntliesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA r/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dare: 06. 18. 2020 Solel/P= 0"

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3B ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A4.2.a
MATERIAL LEGEND © 206 Wood Barge Board
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Fiber CementSquare Columns Q FlatConcreteShingleRoof (NoRakeTile) E FiberCementTopo/ LowWall a Barrel Concrete Tiles at Hip and Ridge a 2x6 Window Trim Surround 6x8 Wood Outlooker + En 2x4 Window Sill
Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins ' E' 2x10HorizontalWoodSiding 2x12 0/ 2x4 Vertical Siding E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
E 2x3Wood SidingEndCaps E OptionalMan Door
E 6x8 CanopyWoodAngel Bracketw/ 4x6 Beam
E FiberglassEntry Doors
E DecorativeExteriorLights & RaisedAddress
2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trim over Garage Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION

RIGHTELEVATION
Architecture+ Planning
17911 Von Kemn Ave. teDiversified Pacific Communities
Suite20041201.1 / OIV µ
rium1FIC
1062, Civic Center Drive
Irvine, CA Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

9.ktgy1.

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA r/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Piot Date 06 18 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3C ELEVATIONS
CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW A4.3

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
0 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND © 206 Wood Barge Board
El Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Q Fiber CementSquare Columns Q FlatConcreteShingleRoof (NoRakeTile) Q FiberCementTopo/ LowWall E Barrel ConcreteTiles at Hipand Ridge a 2x6 Window Trim Surround 6x8 Wood Outlooker + n 2x4 Window Sill
Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins '' 2x10 Horizontal Wood Siding 2x12 0/ 2x4 Vertical Siding E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
E 2x3Wood SidingEndCaps 0 OptionalMan Door
6x8 Canopy Wood Angel Bracket w/ 4x6 Beam
E FiberglassEntry Doors
E DecorativeExteriorLights & RaisedAddress
2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trim over Garage Door
0® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11111cii hint--
ii 111' Ili' I i i fl;
if !. i SIN. 1
ulilll l..-

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture t Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu090V0cDlvarslfieJPV.talCnmmun"iesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Plot Dale: 06. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 3C ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW A4.3.a
ArcKltacW re Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave
Suite200039 1.
9210
ktgy

ROOF BELOW
Second Floor
4 Bedroom, 3. 5 Bath

LAUNDRY
LOFT

ROOF BELOW
L__
DlverslgeJ PacMc Communities
10621CivicRanchoCucamoinga. CA91730 LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0709
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans r
40'- 0"
I T I
sir
0I
L
50 MASTERBEDROOM
HAL
POWD
Li
GE
Ir 7
I \
i l
ENIIRY
DINING
10, x11'- 0'
nnr

KITCHEN
9'-0- X 1tl- 0'
1 a- ° PANTR
DEN1T -Tx12'7'
TFirst Floor
4 Bedroom H Bonus Roo

3. 5 Bath
PIM Dare: 0E10. 2020
PORCH
SCALE 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 0
PLAN 4

TWO STORY
J
P4 - GROSS SF
1ST FLOOR 0920. FT.
2, 113FLOOR 111280. FT.

TOTALLING 2922 SO. FT.

GARAGE 077 0. FT.

A3.4
Architecture Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave.

Suite2000
corn9.ktgy
Dlversigea Pacific Communities
IOU, Civic Center
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91230

3. 5: 12

3. 5: 12

3. 5: 12
ROOF PLAN ( Spanish Santa Barbara - A type)
OVERHANG: 12" Eave ; 0" Rake
ROOF PITCH : 3. 5: 12

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dale: 08. 18. 2020
SCALE: 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 4
PLAN 4

TWO STORY
MATERIAL LEGEND 0 StuccoRecess
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Q RecessedFauxDiamondGableVent MI Concrete "S" Profile RoofTile 0 Tile PaverCapat (LowWall) Baranca a Stucco over Foam Eave e Vinyl Windows
Stucco Sill Trim+ e Exposed Tmss Tails at Eaves
Stucco over Foam Surround EI DecorativeFiberCementShutterPanel 0 StuccooverFoamColumn
O StuccoArched Soffit
0 Stucccover FoamCorbel
Stucco Battered Wall
Fiberglass Entry Doors
1i Decorative EM. Lights & Raised Address
0 M MetalSectionalGarageDoor
0 OptionalMan Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION

RIGHTELEVATION
Architecture+ Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave. •
I.
krtvginye8,5CA
iir,'': 7': 4P' lvarelfieJ Pacific Communaies
Suite 200 / DI„ µ iuOPRCIlIC , 082, Civic Center Hove

9. o292014

1.933,. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA P 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4A ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SANTA BARBARA A5. I

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND 0 StuccoRecess
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) Q RecessedFauxDiamondGableVent MI Concrete "S" Profile RoofTile 0 Tile PaverCapat (LowWall) Baranca a Stucco over Foam Eave 0 VinylWindows
a Stucco Sill Trim E ExposedTmssTails at Eaves
e Stucco over Foam Surround EI DecorativeFiberCementShutterPanel 0 StuccooverFoamColumn
O StuccoArched Soffit
0 Stuccoover FoamCorbel
Stucco Battered Wall
O FiberglassEntryDoors
0 DecorativeEM. Lights & RaisedAddress
M MetalSectionalGarageDoor
0 OptionalMan Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecturea Planning
17911 Von Kennon Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu09RClllCDlvarslfieJCV.teinmmun"ieeRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA ir 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Pale: 06. 18. 2820

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4A ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SANTA BARBARA A5. I .a

MATERIAL LEGEND
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30)
Concrete " S" Profile Roof Tile
E3 Barrel Concrete Roof Tiles at Ridges
Precast Concrete Roof Finial
Es Oval Shape Stucco over Foam Gable End
E CircularShapeStuccoo/ FoamGableTrim E StuccoColumnBase Q Stuccoo/ FoamEave
E Stu... o/ FoamGablePediment
El Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround
E Stucooo/ FoamColumn
EI StuccoArch
Stucco o/ Foam Window Trim Surround
E Stuccoover FoamWindowSill
Stucco over Foam Pot Shelf Trim
E StuccoRecess /Reveal (Where Occurs)
E Vinyl Windowswith Muntins
ie Tile Paver Cap at (Low Wall) Pot Shelf
IMI FiberglassEntryDoor
Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address Sign
zE+ Metal Sectional Garage Door
E OptionalMan Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture+ PlanningI17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Ycom21331a

RIGHTELEVATION
DievIf21 3 106Div21
Civic
P cificDrive, CommunitiesCRanchoCucamonga. CA91730 LURIN LAND Riverside. CA t/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Calm 06. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4B ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A5.2

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTdm
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround

MATERIAL LEGEND
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30)
J Concrete "S" Profile RoofTile
a Barrel Concrete Roof Tiles at Ridges
Precast Concrete Roof Finial
e Oval Shape Stucco over Foam Gable End
0 CircularShapeStuccoo/ FoamGableTrim 0 StuccoColumnBase Q Stuccoo/ FoamEave
0 Stu... o/ FoamGablePediment
O Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround
E Stu... o/ FoamColumn
EI StuccoArch
Stucco o/ Foam Window Trim Surround
E Stuccoover FoamWindowSill
Stucco over Foam Pot Shelf Trim
O StuccoRecess /Reveal (Where Occurs)
0 Vinyl Windowswith Muntins
ie Tile Paver Cap at (Low Wall) Pot Shelf
Q FiberglassEntryDoor
Decorative Ext. Lights & Raised Address Sign
z+ Metal Sectional Garage Door
Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION

RIGHTELEVATION
Architecture+ Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave. • DlvarelfieJ Pacific Communaies
Suite20 CA /
DIV µ iuOPRCIlIC , 082, Civic Center Hove

9. 1. 933,. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730
ktgy

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Date: 06. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4B ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A5.2.a
MATERIAL LEGEND a 2x6 Wood Barge Board
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) 0 FiberCementSquareColumns J Flat ConcreteShingleRoof (No RakeTile) a FiberCementTop o/ LowWall 3 Barrel Concrete Tiles at Hip and Ridge 0 2x6 WindowTrim Surround 6x8 Wood Outlooker E 204WindowSill
s Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins I12x10 HorizontalWoodSiding O 2x120/ 204VerticalSiding J MetalSectionalGarageDoor
O 2x3WoodSidingEndCaps Q OptionalMan Door
O 6x8 CanopyWood AngelBracketw/ 4x6 Beam
Fiberglass Entry Doors
0 DecorativeExteriorLights8 RaisedAddress
O 2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trimover GarageDoor

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture t Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µriEMIF plverelfieJenPeicCnmmuntliesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA t/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Piot Date 06 18 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4C ELEVATIONS

CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTdm
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND a 2x6 Wood Barge Board
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) 0 FiberCementSquareColumns J Flat ConcreteShingleRoof (No RakeTile) a FiberCementTop o/ LowWall 3 Barrel Concrete Tiles at Hip and Ridge 0 2x6 WindowTrim Surround 6x8 Wood Onlooker E 204WindowSill
e Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins ++ 2x10 Horizontal Wood Siding O 2x120/ 204VerticalSiding J MetalSectionalGarageDoor
O 2x3WoodSidingEndCaps Q OptionalMan Door
O 6x8 CanopyWood AngelBracketw/ 4x6 Beam
Fiberglass Entry Doors
0 DecorativeExteriorLights8 RaisedAddress
O 2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trimover GarageDoor

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture t Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µriEMIFICDlvarelfieJPeneicCnmmun"ieeRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA t/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Pk, 1, 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 4C ENHANCED ELEVATIONS

CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW
Architecture Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave
Sure2000

1. 1331d9.ktnycorn
r
III II1il 'N111lI vIai
it „ dd. l I 111 ]J il' VI Alglil II; o
11,1Illj'= iJ' hu
1 MASTERBATH

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
110 X11' 11'
11111111111,111iBATH 2
ALL
r'Ilill_ r'il1Id 16 IP 1__

ROOF BELOW
MISMI6

BEDROOM
1213'% 1210'
Below
Second Floor
LAUNDRY1
L_ J
DlverslBeJ Pacific Communities
IOU, Civic Drive,
Rancho Cucamoinga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA r/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans 40- 0"
7 KITCHEN
1801, 11.
8 8-8
PANTRY

SROPTPODER
DROP
GARAGE
I 1
1 /
I

EXSELELRTDNAIOTNAL
LOTS
First FI¢ or
5 Bedroo} n, 4. 5 Bath
MIN. LOTSIZE
w• 9a
PIM Dare: 08. 18. 2020
ENTRY
SCALE 1/ 4"= 1'- 0"
0 2 d
RENORM50PT11%13'8' 08
5'-0"
J
PLAN 5

TWO STORY
P5 - GROSS SF

1. FLOOR IBS) SO. FT.

FLOOR 1702811 FT.

TOTAL LIVING 3339 SL. FT.

GARAGE
A3.5
Architecture a Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave
Sure2000

1. 923109.ktgyconn
Dlverslgerl Pacific Communities
10621 Civic Center
Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91230

3. 5: 12
RIDGE

3. 5: 12 3. 5: 12

3. 5: 12
ROOF PLAN ( Spanish Santa Barbara - A type)
OVERHANG: 12" Eave; 0" Rake
ROOF PITCH : 3. 5: 12

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dare: 06. 18. 2020
SCALE: 1/ 4"= 1'- P'
0 2 a
PLAN 5
TWO STORY A3.5a
MATERIAL LEGEND © Stucco Recess
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E RecessedFaux DiamondGableVent Q Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Baranoa Ea Stucco over Foam Eave Ea Vinyl Windows
Stucco Sill Trim Eo Exposed Truss Tails at Eaves
Ea Stucco over Foam Surround + E+ DecorativeFiber CementShutterPanel E Stuccoover FoamColumn
E StuccoArched Soffit
E Stuccoover FoamCorbel
E StuccoBatteredWall
Ea FiberglassEntryDoors
E DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress
a Metal Sectional Garage Door
E OptionalManDoor

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
Architecture t Planning
17911 Von Kennon Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu09RClllCDlvarslfieJPV.talCnmmun"ieeRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Plot Dale: 06. 18. 2020
lair:I111'461r

REARELEVATION
PLAN 5A ELEVATIONS

SPANISH SANTA BARBARA

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND © Stucco Recess
E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E RecessedFaux DiamondGableVent Q Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Tile PaverCap at (LowWall) Baranoa Ea Stucco over Foam Eave Ea Vinyl Windows
Stucco Sill Trim EI ExposedTrussTailsat Eaves
Ea Stucco over Foam Surround + E+ DecorativeFiber CementShutterPanel E Stuccoover FoamColumn
E StuccoArched Soffit
E Stuccoover FoamCorbel
e Stucco Battered Wall
Ea FiberglassEntryDoors
E DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress
a Metal Sectional Garage Door
E OptionalManDoor

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION

RIGHTELEVATION
Arehlt. ture a Planning
17911 Von Kerman Ave. •
I.
krtvginye8,5CAiirliDlvarelfieJ
Pacaic Communaies
Suite 200 DI µ iuOPRCIlIC , 082, Civic Center Cnve

9. o292014

1.933,. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA ir 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Date: 06182020
REAR
PLAN 5A ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
SPANISH SANTA BARBARA A6. I .a
MATERIAL LEGEND E CircularShape Stuccoo/ FoamGableTdm g StuccoColumnBase E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Stuccoo/ FoamEave
E Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Stuccoo/ FoamGable Pediment E Barrel ConcreteRoofTilesat Ridges E Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround E PrecastConcreteRoofFinial E Stuccoo/ FoamColumn
E Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End ++ Stucco Arch
E Stuccoo/ FoamWindowTrim Surround
E StuccoOverFoamWindowSill
E Stuccoover FoamPotShelfTrim
E & RC. Recess /Reveal (WhereOccurs)
Vinyl Windows with Muntins
Ea Tile PaverCapat (Low Wall) PotShelf
E FiberglassEntryDoor
0 DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress Sign
E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
Optional Man Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION

RIGHTELEVATION
Architecture+ Planning
17911 Von Kemlen Ave. Dlvarelfiea Pacific Communaies
Suite20 CA /
DIV µ iuOPRCInC , 082, Civic Center Hove

1. 933,. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91) 30

9.ktuy

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA r/ 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Date: 08. 18. 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 5B ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A6.2

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 136WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND E CircularShape Stuccoo/ FoamGableTrim g StuccoColumnBase E Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Stuccoo/ FoamEave
E Concrete "S" ProfileRoofTile E Stuccoo/ FoamGable Pediment E Barrel ConcreteRoofTilesat Ridges E Stuccoo/ FoamEntryPorchSurround E PrecastConcreteRoofFinial E Stuccoo/ FoamColumn
E Oval ShapeStuccoover FoamGable End ++ Stucco Arch
E Stuccoo/ FoamWindowTrim Surround
E Stuccoover FoamWindowSill
E Stuccoover FoamPotShelfTrim
E Stucco Recess /Reveal (WhereOccurs)
M VinylWindowswith Muntins
Ea Tile PaverCapat (Low Wall) PotShelf
E FiberglassEntryDoor
0 DecorativeExt. Lights & RaisedAddress Sign
E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
LI OptionalMan Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATIONLI
Architecturea Planning
17911 Von Karmen Ave.

Suite2000
9Y corn

RIGHTELEVATION
OIV µfiu090V0CDlvarslfieJPen
eic
CnmmunaiesRancho Cucamonga. CA 91730

LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA it 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans PIM Dare: 06. 18. 2020 olt': Ill"= 1kIr

REARELEVATION
PLAN 5B ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
ITALIANATE A6.2.a
MATERIAL LEGEND © 206 Wood Barge Board
El Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Fiber CementSquare Columns Q FlatConcreteShingleRoof (NoRakeTile) Q FiberCementTop0/ LowWall E BarrelConcreteTiles at Hipand Ridge a 206 Window Trim Surround 6x8 Wood Outlooker Q 2x4WindowSill
Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins '' 2x10 Horizontal Wood Siding 2x12 0/ 2x4 Vertical Siding E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
O 2,6 Wood SidingEndCaps [] Optional Man Door
6x8 Canopy Wood Angel Bracket w/ 4x6 Beam
O FiberglassEntry Doors
O DecorativeExteriorLights & RaisedAddress
2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trim over Garage Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
ArchitectureaPlanning117911 Von Kerman Ave.

Suite2000

9.ktgy1.
2933,.

RIGHTELEVATION
01Vx r.

Diversified Pacific Communities
pe
CRanchoCucemonge.CA9„. LURIN LAND
Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans Plot Date 06 18 2020

REARELEVATION
PLAN 5C ELEVATIONS
CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW A6.3

ENHANCED FEATURES AT ENHANCE LOCATIONS
Q StuccooverFoamSurround
O StuccooverFoamWindowSillTrim
0 DecorativeShutterPerStyle
Q 1x6WindowTrimSurround
MATERIAL LEGEND © 206 Wood Barge Board
M Stucco, Light SandFinish (20/30) E Fiber CementSquare Columns Q FlatConcreteShingleRoof (NoRakeTile) Q FiberCementTop01LowWall E] BarrelConcreteTiles at Hipand Ridge a 206 Window Trim Surround Q 6x8 WoodOutlooker Q 2x4WindowSill
Vinyl Windows w/ Decorative Muntins '' 2x10 Horizontal Wood Siding 2x12 0/ 2x4 Vertical Siding E MetalSectionalGarageDoor
O 2,6 Wood SidingEndCaps 0 OptionalMan Door
6x8 Canopy Wood Angel Bracket w/ 4x6 Beam
O FiberglassEntry Doors
O DecorativeExteriorLights & RaisedAddress
2x4 0/ 2x6 head Trim over Garage Door

LEFTELEVATION FRONTELEVATION
0 Architecture+ Planning117911 Von Kerman Ave.

Suite2000

9.ktgy1.
2933,.

RIGHTELEVATION
01Vxr. 3 DiversifiedPacificCommunitiesCRanchoCucemtru9rteo„. LURIN LAND Riverside. CA p 2019- 0789
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

REARELEVATION
PLAN 5C ENHANCED ELEVATIONS
CRAFTSMAN/ BUNGALOW A6.3.a
STUCCO

SHUTTER
WINDOW

DOOR/GARAGE
ROOF

A - SPANISHSANTABARBARA
2 3 4
SHOJIWHITE (SW7042)
SMOKEHOUSE (SW7040)

MILGARD - WHITE
SMOKEHOUSE (SW7040)
imam
SOFTERTAN (SW6141) USEFULGREY (SW7050)
SUITABLEBROWN (SW70S4) ADAPTIVESHADE (SW7053)
1MILGARD - WHITE MILGARD - WHITE
SUITABLEBROWN (SW1054) ADAPTIVESHADE (SW7053)

BORAL - CASAGRANDEBLEND BORAL - CASAGRANDEBLEND BORAL - CASAGRANDEBLEND PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans STUCCO
TRIM

SHUTTER
WINDOW

DOOR/GARAGE
ROOF
PRAIREGRASS (SW7546)
11111111
AESTHETICWHITE (SW7035)
VANDYKEBROWN (SW7041)

MILGARD - WHITE
VAN DYKEBROWN (SW7041)

BORAL - CAMELOTBLEND

B - ITAILIANATE
5 6
RELAXEDKHAKI (SW6149) PRACTICALBEIGE (SW6I00)
111111J
NACRE (SW6154) PANDAWHITE (SW6141)
PORPOISE (SW7047) PROTEGEBRONZE (5W6153)

MILGARD - WHITE
PORPOISE (SW7047)

MILGARD - WHITE
PROTEGEBRONZE (SW6I53)

BORAL - CAMELOTBLEND BORAL - CLIFFSIDE
STUCCO
TRIM

SHUTTERS
WINDOW

DOOR/GARAGE
SIDING
ROOF

C - CRAFTSMAN/BUNGALOW
7 8 9
ESCAPEGREY (SW6185)
i
SHOJIWHITE (SW7042)
SHADE -GROWN (SW6188)

MILGARD - WHITE
SHADE -GROWN (SW6188)
SUITABLEBROWN (SW7054)
ANEWGREY (SW7030) RELAXEDKHAKI (SW6149)
J T
SIPMLEWHITE (SW7021) ALABASTER (SW7008)
URBANEBRONZE (SW7048) STILLWATER (SW6223)

MILGARD - WHITE
URBANEBRONZE (SW7048)
PEWTERGREEN (SW6208)

MILGARD - WHITE
STILLWATER (SW6223)
SUITABLEBROWN (SW7054)

BORAL - AUTUMNWOOD
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 6 - Project Plans

BORAL - AUTUMNWOOD BORAL - VINTAGEWOOD
Variance Justification Form
Project Description: Design Review and Tentative Tract Map approval for a Planned Residential Development with 41 numbered lots and 7 lettered lots with one and two story single family residential units.

Project Location: SEC of Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive Assessor' s Parcel Number ( APN): 266- 100- 025- 4
Variance Requested: Reduce the required setback from the right- of-way line to the property/ block wall line at Lots 17-23 along Lurin Avenue.

Required Findings

1. Will the strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Code result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code?
The Planned Residential Development standards for the R- 1- 13000 Zone would require 15 to 25 feet landscape setback, free of any structures including walls and fences, adjacent to public streets. The intent of the required setback is to ensure a well- designed project appearance from the public street but strict compliance with the setback requirement would result in a wide, reverse frontage landscape areas along Lurin Avenue that are substantially larger than those of the surrounding development.

Compliance with the setback requirement would require a reduction in the usable private and common open space areas in exchange for creating unusable, passive landscape areas along the perimeter street resulting in practical difficulty and an unnecessary hardship contrary to the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code, and more specifically the purpose of the Planned Residential Development Permit ordinance.

2. Are there special circumstances or conditions applicable to your property or to the intended use of development of your property that do not apply generally to other property in the vicinity and under the identical zoning classification.

The proposal complies with this finding. Majority of the surrounding developments consists of conventional subdivisions which are not subject the perimeter setback requirements applicable to PRD' s. In conventional subdivisions in R- 1 zones, reverse and side frontage lots are not subject to any perimeter landscape setback requirement.

Fences and wall setbacks, observed at existing developments in the immediate project area, range from zero to twelve feet. In addition, reduced setbacks along Lurin Avenue and Wood Road were recently approved for Tentative Tract 37593, a PRD project adjacent to and east of the proposed project. Compliance with the required landscaped setback provision would create a landscape setback area that would be inconsistent PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 7 - Applicant Prepared Variance Justifications with the surround pattern of development, and thus constitute an exceptional circumstance that does not apply to other properties in the same zone or neighborhood.

3. Will granting of such a variance prove materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the zone or neighborhood in which your property is located.

The granting of this request is not detrimental to public welfare or injurious to the properties and improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. The proposed project design includes parkway landscaping in the right- of-way along Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive consistent with right- of-way improvements along conventional subdivisions in other areas of the neighborhood. In addition, reduced setbacks along Lurin Avenue and Wood Road were recently approved for Tentative Tract 37593, a PRD project adjacent to and east of the proposed project.

4. Will the granting of such variance be contrary to the objectives of any part of the General Plan?
Granting this request to allow reduced setbacks is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan 2025. Specifically, the proposed project will provide a diversity of single- family residential housing and project types within an existing single- family neighborhood consistent with General Plan 2025 Goal H-2, Policy LU -8.1, Objective LU -35, Policy LU -35. 2, Policy LU -36. 1, Policy LU -36. 5, Objective LU -75, Policy LU -75.4.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 7 - Applicant Prepared Variance Justifications View of the site looking south from Lurin Avenue
View of the site looking south from Lurin Avenue
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 8 - Existing Site Photos View of the site looking southeast from the corner of Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive View of the site looking northeast from the corner of Obsidian Drive and McDowell Road PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 8 - Existing Site Photos Crib -ofArts & Innovation

INITIAL STUDY
Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Drive Development Project Prepared for:

City of Riverside Community & Economic Development Department Planning Division
Prepared by..

LSA Associates, Inc.
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, California 92507
June 2021
R- 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, DR, VR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

TABLE OF CONTENTS
DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 9
DETERMINATION 9
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY 10
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 10

1. AESTHETICS 12

2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES 15

3. AIR QUALITY 18

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 24

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES 31

6. ENERGY 34

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS 36

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 42

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 50

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 55

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING 60

12. MINERAL RESOURCES 62

13. NOISE 63

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING 70

15. PUBLIC SERVICES 72

16. RECREATION 75

17. TRANSPORTATION 76

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 79

19. UTILITIES AND SYSTEM SERVICES 83

20. WILDFIRE 88

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 90
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 91
Tables
Table A: Lettered Lot Details 2
Table B: Project Site and Surrounding Land Use and Zoning 3 Table C: Estimated Construction Emissions 20
Table D: Regional Operational Emissions 21
Table E: Operational Localized Impacts Analysis 21
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Table F: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis 22
Table G: Vegetation Communities 25
Table H: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions 44
Table I: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions 44
Table J: Riverside Restorative Growthprint Climate Action Plan Emission Reduction Strategies Consistency 46 Table K: Existing Traffic Noise Levels 64
Table L: HVAC Noise Levels 66
Table M: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Exterior Traffic Noise Levels 66 Table N: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Interior Traffic Noise Levels 67 Table 0: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria 68
Table P: Summary of Construction Vibration Levels 68
Table Q: SCAG Population Projections 70
Table R: Baseline ( 2012) and Cumulative ( 2040) Jurisdictional and Project VMT per Capita Comparison 77 Table S: Native American Tribes Consulted 79
Table T: Riverside Projected Water Supply/Demand (acre-feet/year) 85 Figures
Figure 1: Regional Location 6
Figure 2: Project Location 7
Figure 3: Project Site Plan 8
Appendices
A: Project Plan Sets
B: Air Quality and GreenhouseGas Impact Analysis
C MSHCP ConsistencyAnalysis andGeneralBiological Assessment/StepI Habitat Assessment, StepII, Part A FocusedBurrow Survey and StepII, Part B FocusedBurrowing Owl Survey/Burrowing Owl Update Report D: Cultural Resource Assessment
E: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing F: Preliminary Hydrology Report
G: Water Quality ManagementPlan Report
H: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
I: Trip Generation Memorandum
J: VMT Memorandum
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

CITY OF

RIVET SIDE

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

DRAFT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WARD: 4

1. Case Numbers: PR - 2021- 000733 ( TM/ PRD/ DR/ VR) and P20- 0523 ( Agricultural Preserve Cancellation)

2. Project Title: Obsidian Drive Development Project

3. Lead Agency: City of Riverside
Community & Economic Development Department
Planning Division
3900 Main Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, California 92522

4. Contact Person: Judy Eguez, Associate Planner
JEguez@riversideca. gov ( 951) 826- 3969

5. Project Location: The project site is located at 18875 Lurin Avenue, situated south of Lurin Avenue and northeastof Obsidian Drive, in the City of Riverside. The Project would be developedon Assessor' s Parcel Number ( APN) 266- 100- 025, a 10. 06 - gross acre, undeveloped/ vacant site. See Figure 1: Regional Location and Figure 2: Project Location.

6. Project Applicant/ Project Sponsor' s Name and Address:

Nolan C. Leggio
Lurin Land, LLC
10621 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
NLeggio@DiversifiedPacific. com

7. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR)

8. Zoning: OSP-RA- SPResidential Agriculture and Specific Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones

9. Description of Project: The proposed Tentative Tract No. 37733 - Obsidian Drive Development Project ( herein referred to as the " proposed Project" or " Project") consists of the following entitlements to facilitate the establishment of an 41 -unit Planned Residential Development: ( 1) Tentative Tract Map (TM 37733) approval to subdivide 9.08 (of the 10.06 -gross acre site) acresinto 41 single-family residential lots, 7 lettered lots for private streets and common open space; ( 2) Planned Residential Development for the establishment of detached single-family dwelling units, private streets, andcommon open space; (3) Variance to allow areducedperimeter setback at lots 1 and 17 through 23 along Lurin Avenue; ( 4) Design Review of Project plans, and ( 5) Cancellation of Agricultural Preserve No. 3 and Williamson Act Contract on the Project site. See Appendix A:

Project Set Plans.

Upon cancellation of the existing Agricultural PreserveNo. 3 and Williamson Act contract, the site will revert to the R- 1- 13000 zone.

Figure 3: Project Site Plan showsthe site plan for the proposedProject including the 41 lots where the single- family residential units would be developed. The minimum lot size would be 5,115 squarefeet, the maximum lot size would be 7,679 squarefeet, and the averagelot size would be 5,826 squarefeet. The Project density would equateto 4.08 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The Project site would also contain sevenlettered lots that PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration would be occupied by non-residential uses. Table A: Lettered Lot Details showsthe details on the sevenlots including their size and their use.

Table A: Lettered Lot Details
Lot Gross Area ( square feet) Use Description
A 3, 255 Slope
B 1,526 Slope
C 20, 574 Park/ Open Space
D 36, 289 Water Quality Management Plan Basin
E 9, 366 Slope
F 4, 043 Slope
G 1,515 Slope
Total Lot Area 76, 568
Source: Lurin Land LLC, Tentative Tract Map No. 3773, September 18, 2020.

The lettered lots on the Project site would total 76, 568 square feet, which includes 20, 574 square feet of park/ open space within the Project site, which exceeds the minimum required common open space area. The parks/ open spaceon the Project site would have amenities for public use including barbecue (BBQ) facilities, picnic tables, tot play area, rubberized walking path, turf play area, and a dog run.

All setbackinformation for the Project site hasbeenreviewed and comparedto the City of Riverside Zoning Code and is consistent to applicable setback requirements for the R-1-13000 zoning designations under the PlannedResidential Development (PRD) Permit. The proposed Project is requesting aVariance to the Perimeter setback, which requires 25 feet adjacent to a public street. The applicant of the proposed Project is also requesting modified setbacksfor eachof the lots asthe proposed building setbacksfor eachlot arenot consistent with the R- 1- 13000 Zone.

Precise construction schedule details are unknown at this time and would be dependent on the residential market; therefore, for the purpose of this IS/ MND, construction is assumed to commence in 2021 with operations occurring as early as 2022. The various phasesof construction include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. The site clearing and grading phaseswould disturb vegetation and surface soils. Preliminary estimatesindicate approximately 19,238 cubic yards of soil cut and 37,084 cubic yards of soil fill. The overall soil disturbancewould yield approximately 21,234 cubic yards of import.

The Project site will be landscapedwith a variety of trees and plants that are consistent with the type of landscaping found in similar planned developmentsin the City of Riverside. The Project will include a variety of walls and fencing that are typical of residential developments in the City of Riverside. Walls up to 6 feet in height will be developed on the perimeter of the Project site while interior walls ( 5 feet, 6 inches in height) will be installed as applicable around lots within the site. Tan vinyl lot fencing ( 5 feet, 6 inches in height) will separateeachof the 41 lots within the Project site. Tubular fencing (5 feet, 6 inches in height) will be installed on the perimeter of the basins within the Project site. Appendix A: Project Set Plans shows the landscape plans and fencing plans.

10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Once the Agricultural PreserveNo. 3 and the Williamson Act contract is canceled, the sitewill revert to the R-1-13000zone, which is consistentwith zoning designationssurrounding the site. Table B: Project Site and Surrounding Land Use and Zoning lists the surrounding land usesand zoning.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Table B: Proiect Site and Surrounding Land Use and Zonin

11. Other public agencies whose approval is required ( e.g., permits, financial approval, or participation agreement.):
a. City of Riverside
b. Regional Water Quality Control Board ( RWQCB), Santa Ana Region — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Construction General Permit c. RWQCB, Santa Ana Region — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) d. RWQCB, Santa Ana Region — Section 401 Water Quality Certification -Waste Discharge Requirement e. South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD) — Dust Control Plan

12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080. 3. 1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significant impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
The City of Riverside sent out notices to the following tribes to initiate consultation on February 20, 2020, pursuant to Assembly Bill 52:

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
Rincon Band of Luisefio Indians
Gabrielino- Tongva Tribe ( San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians) San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
The following California Native American tribes have requested consultation with the City of Riverside pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080. 3. 1:

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
The results of these consultations will be discussed in Section 18 below.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Existing Land Use
General Plan
Designation Zoning Designation
Project
Site
Majority is Vacant except
large standingmetal building
in the northeast portion of the
site
Low Density
Residential
LDR)
OSP- RA- SP — Residential Agricultural and Specific
Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones
North Large Lot Single -Family
Residential
Low Density
Residential
LDR)
R -1 -13000 -SP - Single Family Residential and
Specific Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones and RA-
SP — Residential Agricultural and Specific Plan
Orangecrest) Overlay Zones
East Vacant ( Developed Pads and
internal streets)
Low Density
Residential
LDR)
R -1 -13000 -SP - Single Family Residential and
Specific Plan ( Orangecrest) Overlay Zones
South Large Lot Single -Family
Residential
Very Low
Density
Residential
VLDR)
R -1 -1/2 -SP — Single Family Residential and Specific
Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones and OSP-RA- SP —
Residential Agricultural and Specific Plan
Orangecrest) Overlay Zones
West Vacant Public Park ( P) R -1 -10500 -SP - Single Family Residential and Specific Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones

11. Other public agencieswhose approvalis required (e.g., permits, financial approval, or participation agreement.):
a. Cityof Riverside
b. RegionalWater Quality Control Board ( RWQCB), Santa Ana Region — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Construction General Permit c. RWQCB, Santa Ana Region — Storm Water Pollution PreventionPlan ( SWPPP) d. RWQCB, Santa Ana Region — Section401 Water Quality Certification -Waste Discharge Requirement e. South CoastAir Quality ManagementDistrict ( SCAQMD) — Dust Control Plan

12. Have California Native Americantribes traditionallyand culturally affiliatedwith the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080.3. 1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determinationof significant impactsto tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
The Cityof Riversidesentout noticesto the followingtribesto initiate consultationon February20, 2020, pursuantto AssemblyBill 52:

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
PechangaBand of Luiseno Indians
Rincon Band of Luisefio Indians
Gabrielino- Tongva Tribe ( San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians) San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
The following CaliforniaNative Americantribes have requested consultationwith the City of Riverside pursuantto Public Resources Code 21080.3. 1:

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
The resultsof these consultationswill be discussedin Section18 below.

PR - 2020- 000733 (TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration l 3. Other Environmental Reviews Incorporated by Reference in this Review:
a. City of Riverside General Plan 2025 (GP 2025)
b. GP 2025 Final Program EIR ( FPEIR)
c. City of Riverside Housing Element Update 2014- 2021
d. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
e. Biological Resources Assessment/ Habitat Assessment/ Jurisdictional Delineation f. Cultural Resources Assessment
g. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing h. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment
i. Preliminary Hydrology Report
j. Water Quality Management Plan Report
k. Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis

1. Trip Generation Memorandum/Vehicle Miles Traveled Memorandum

14. Acronyms
AB Assembly Bill
APN Assessor' s Parcel Number
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
Basin South Coast Air Basin
BBQ barbecue
BMP Best Management Practice
BUOW burrowing owl
Ca1EEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAP Climate Action Plan
CBC California Building Code
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CHa methane
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
CWA ( Federal) Clean Water Act
DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan
dBA A -weighted decibel
DCV Design Capture Volume
DMA Drainage Management Area
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
FPEIR GP 2025 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report FTA Federal Transit Authority
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GP 2025 General Plan 2025
HCOC Hydrologic Condition of Concern
HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
IS/ MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
lbs/day pounds per day
Leg equivalent continuous sound level
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Lnax maximum noise level
LRA Local Responsibility Area
LST localized significance threshold
mgd million gallons per day
MLD Most Likely Descendant
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems
MSHCP Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
MT metric ton
N2O nitrous oxide
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NOx nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OSP Orangecrest Specific Plan Zone
PM2. s particulate matter less than 2. 5 microns in size PMIo particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PPV peak particle velocity
PRC Public Resources Code
PRD Planned Residential Development
RA Residential Agriculture
REC Recognized Environmental Condition
RMC Riverside Municipal Code
ROW right- of- way
RPD Riverside Police Department
RPU Riverside Public Utilities
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
RUSD Riverside Unified School District
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SB Senate Bill
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCS SustainableCommunities Strategy
SOx sulfur oxide
SRA StateResponsibility Area
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VdB vibration velocity decibels
VOC volatile organic compound
WMWD Western Municipal Water District
WRCRWA WesternRiverside County Regional WastewaterAuthority WQMP Water Quality Management Plan
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration LSA
0 1000 2000
FEET
SOURCE: Bing ( 2018)
LEGEND
I I Project Location
FIGURE 1
Obsidian Development Project
Regional Location
P R42(120 MafflutaPRIarVRa, n-DRYEditillit° 9)- Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration LSA
150 300
FEET
SOURCE: Google Earth ( 2020), KWC Engineering
LEGEND
Project Site
FIGURE 2
Obsidian Development Project
Project Location
I:\ DFD2001\ G\ ISMND\ Project_ Location. ai ( 10/ 29/ 2020) PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 110015F081/ 0570 Be

SCREENED WITII
pVH
0X11
FUTURE

CITY PARK
PC RAN, X4VENIRE5 ( TM
0101150 ASPHALT
629
LUN/ NAVE __--
I ' t
30' JIB

EIRE NVORA
NUMBERED LOTS:

GROSSAREAIN N. IMxiR. 1.06110.

San. IxPriv. 0.1•1151101251, 1. 57.

LEGEIN
5245 849 783
100 5118 1065 107
KOR
107 7673 3551 157
12441021 sar
5505 9114 7233
5872 1130
EGO 117 32 7110 1571
10 5. 9 686 127 105.
5911 117
12 5871
668 117. 746
718 117 5719 832
533 ssr 5467
16 698 5467 1. 8
715 110 5447 1198
18 6104 1975 5274 sr
1537 AVERAGE 1. 0 113
1428 TOE. LOT MEM 1. 305
1064 MAX LOT AREA A 7. 619
107
1227 103.

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:

1. TOTAL PRalECT ACREAGE a 9..98 AC ( la. 05 GROSS AC)
ACREAGESUMMARYMCA LOT f AREA 551 55Xpr9aneTB.

S1033E (
WOW 84/ X9 CM BA'

SLOP SC / OPEN SPICE
flz AT
a PARKS RA SB
E. ROW TO ROW . 11 lu
F. ROWOEDK%RpN M. P. LIM 10X
OP. AR0 LU AYE)

1. EXS1NC GPUN A2GW1XNf CDR- LOW DENS/ 7r
RESIMNRAL ( 3- b 8 00U/ AC)
5XIS' ANG MVP. R4- 50 R6/ OENI8 A0% LULTORIL AND
8( L' R0 PUN ( ORANOECREST) OVERLAY AWES
D. PRo565SON. PERauNCELRESr5P, ERECANBEEVELOPED TO R- 1- 1. 00 WON OAROE.LLArbN OF WWA^ RESr ACRR' ULTaRAL PRESERVE NO. J
S PROPOSED NO. OF OWELL50 (/ NIS , LOTS
b PROPOSED PR0/ ECr OENS/ r) 0 908 881/ AC
7 44595435 ERT SAE. 5375 SO Fr.

B AKRAGE tor SW: 4858 50. FI.

ZONING OF SVG PROFERTY. R- 1- 13000
IOAIERACE NARNRL . SLOPE OF MN::: 107X
PARKING SUMMARY:

PARKING REQUIRED
ENCLOSED GARAGE SPACE ( 2 PER UNIT) 82
GUEST PARKING SPACE ( 1 PER 3 UNITS) 14
TOTAL REQUIRED: 96

PARKING PROVIDED
ENCLOSED GARAGE SPACE( 2 PER UNIT) BO
ON -STREET GUEST PARKING 30
TOTAL PROVIDED: 110
NOTES:

USE ENHANCED ELEVATIONS ON ALL ELEVATIONS THAT FACE PUBLIC STREETS.

ALL AC CONDENSERS TO BE PLACED IN THE SIDE YARD OR REAR YARD AND FULLY SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

ALL SCE TRANSFORMERS TO 88 SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW WITH LANDSCAPING.

ALL DRIVEWAYS TO BE 16' WIDE.

LSA
80 160
FEET
SOURCE: Community Works Design Group
PR j o, vR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration FIGURE 3
Obsidian Development Project
Site Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checkedbelow would bepotentially affectedby this project, involving at leastoneimpact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" asindicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics
Biological Resources
Geology and Soils
Hydrology and Water Quality
Noise
Recreation
Utilities and Service Systems
Agriculture & Forest Resources
Cultural Resources
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
Transportation
Wildfire
Air Quality
Energy
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Mineral Resources
Public Service
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mandatory Findings of Significance

DETERMINATION
To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation, which reflects the independent judgment of the City of Riverside, it is recommended that:

The City of Riverside finds that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

The City of Riverside finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this casebecauserevisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

The City of Riverside finds that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

The City of Riverside finds that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or " potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) hasbeen adequatelyanalyzed in an earlier documentpursuantto applicable legal standards, and2) hasbeenaddressedby mitigation measuresbased on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

The City of Riverside finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects ( a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Environmental Impact Report ( EIR) or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and ( b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature Date
Printed Name & Title For City of Riverside
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

CITY OF
IZIVEIk$ IDE

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answersthat are adequately supportedby the information sourcesa lead agencycites in the parenthesesfollowing eachquestion. A " No Impact" answer is adequatelysupportedif the referencedinformation sourcesshow that the impact simply doesnot apply to projects like the one involved ( e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A " No Impact" answer should be explained where it is basedon project -specific factors aswell asgeneral standards (e.g., the project will not exposesensitive receptorsto pollutants, basedon a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answersmust take account of the whole action involved, including off site aswell ason site, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agencyhas determinedthat a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. " Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriateif there is substantialevidencethat an effect may be significant. If there are one or more " Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) " Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measureshasreduced an effect from " Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The leadagencymust describethe mitigation measuresandbriefly explain how they reducethe effect to a less than significant level ( mitigation measures from " Earlier Analyses," asdescribedin (5) below, may be cross- referenced).
5) Earlier analysesmay be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, aneffect hasbeenadequatelyanalyzedin an earlier EIR or negativedeclaration.

Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and statewherethey areavailable for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scopeof and adequatelyanalyzedin an earlier documentpursuantto applicable legal standards, and statewhether such effects were addressedby mitigation measuresbasedon the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are " Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they addresssite-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, usedto evaluateeachquestion; and PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration b. The mitigation measureidentified, if any, to reducethe impact to lessthan significance. 9) Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080. 3. 1? If so, has consultation begun? Note: Conducting consultationearly in theCEQA processallows tribal governments, leadagencies, andproject proponentsto discussthe level of environmentalreview, identify andaddresspotential adverseimpactsto tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083. 3. 2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission' s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code Section 5097. 96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code Section 21082. 3( c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

1. AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 la. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure CCM - 4 — Master Plan of Roadways, General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 1- 1— Scenic and Special Boulevards and Parkways, Table 5. 1- A — Scenic and Special Boulevards, and Table 5. 1- B — Scenic Parkways; and, Google Earth)
Less Than Significant Impact. The City' s General Plan 2025 policies aim at balancing development interests with broader community preservationobjectives. The GeneralPlanidentifies hillsides andridgelines in the City, aswell asthe City' snatural terrain and vegetation, as scenic vistas. For example, the La Sierra/ Norco Hills, Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park, Box Springs Park, and the peaks of Box Springs Mountain, Mt. Rubidoux, Arlington Mountain, Alessandro Heights and the La Sierra/Norco Hills provide scenic viewpoints of the City and the region. The Project doesnot constitute hillside development on slopesgreaterthan 15 percent) where special considerationsof the City' s natural terrain must be consideredfor impacts to scenic vistas. The site and immediate vicinity are not designatedby the City' s General Plan for the preservation of scenic views.

The Project site is located in the Orangecrest Specific Plan Area within a semi -urbanized area in the vicinity of existing residential development. The nearestscenicresources in proximity to the site aremajor hills and canyons (northwest of Roberts Road) located approximately 2.1 miles northwest of the Project site. Other features in proximity to the Project area include Lake Mathews approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest and the Temescal Mountains approximately 2.9 miles to the southwest. Distant views of the Santa Ana Mountains to the Project' s southwest are also available. However, views from public areasin the vicinity of the Project site include single-family residential uses, large lot single-family residential uses, vacant land, and roads. The Project consists of the development of a single-family residential unit neighborhood, which is consistent with the current pattern of residential development in the Project area.

Views of the distant Temescal Mountains and Santa Ana Mountains exist as one looks southwest from the proposed Project site. However, low and mid-level views of these mountains are obstructed by existing residential structures, vegetation, and existing perimeter walls delineating property boundaries. The other scenic features described above are not visible from the Project site. Travelers on local roadways would experience changes in on-site scenery, but existing views to more distant geographic features would be maintained. Since the Project would be consistent with the residential nature of existing land uses in the area, views available to local residents would be maintained becausesingle-family homes, ornamental landscape, and utility poles already obstruct distant scenic vistas viewable from the Project area. Due to the mass and height of the proposed residential buildings on the site, local or regional scenic vistas would still be visible, and the Project would not have significant adverse impacts on such areas. Through compliance with and implementation of General Plan/ Specific Plan Policies andZoning Coderequirements, relatedto scenicvistas, direct, indirect andcumulative impactsto scenicvistasdueto Project implementation are less than significant impacts. No mitigation is required. b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
X
lb. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure CCM - 4 — Master Plan of Roadways, General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 1- 1— Scenic and Special Boulevards, Parkways, Table 5. 1- A — Scenic and Special Boulevards, Table 5. 1- B — Scenic Parkways, the City' s Urban Forest Tree Policy Manual, Title 20 — Cultural Resources and, Title 19 — Article V — Chapter 19. 100 — Residential Zones - RC Zone; LSA, Cultural Resources Assessment Lurin Obsidian Tract Project, February 2020)
No Impact. The majority of the Project site is currently vacant except for a large standing metal building in the northeastern portion of the site. Remnants of a building foundation are also located near the northern boundary of the proposed Project.

Adjacent uses include a residential neighborhood and single-family residential units on large lots to the north, a parcel of land that is being prepared for a residential development to the east, residential neighborhood and single-family residential units on large lots to the south, and vacant land to the west.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration The Cultural Resource Assessmentprepared for the Project in February 2020 concluded that no resources were documented on the site during surveyreviews and fieldwork. There areno Statescenichighways located nearthe Project site. As designated by the City' s General Plan 2025, the proposed Project is not located along or within view of a scenic boulevard, parkway, or special boulevard. The nearest scenic parkway to the Project site is Van Buren Boulevard approximately 0.75 mile north of the Project site. The Project site cannotbe seenfrom this roadway due to intervening structures, trees, and topography.

No designated scenic resources, State scenic highways, or locally designated scenic roadways are on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, the proposedProject would have no impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively to scenicresourcewithin a Statescenic highway. No mitigation is warranted.
c. In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site the site and its surroundings? ( Public views are those that are experiencedfrom apublicly -accessiblevantagepoint.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing
scenic quality?
X
lc. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025, General Plan 2025 FPEIR, Zoning Code, Citywide Design and Sign Guidelines, Riverside Municipal Code Section 19. 100 and 19. 570) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in a semi - urbanized portion of Riverside within the Orangecrest Specific Plan. The majority of the Project site is currently vacant except for a large standing metal building in the northeastern portion of the site. Remnants of a building foundation are also located near the northern boundary of the proposed Project. The proposed Project envisions the development of 41 single-family residential units, internal circulation ( neighborhood roads), and a common use park, similar to the residential development to the northwest of the site. Implementation of the Project would continue the pattern of residential development within the OrangecrestSpecific Plan and in accordancewith the City' s General Plan and Zoning designations of the Project site.

The Project applicant is requesting a Planned Residential Development ( PRD) Permit pursuant to Section 19.780.010 of the Municipal Code to allow for flexibility and creativity in design of the single-family residential development planned for the Project site. The PRD Permit allows for different developmentdensity comparedto thebasezoning designationsof the Project site. The BenchmarkDensity under the PRD Permit for R-1-13000zoning designationis 4.8 dwelling units/acre. Overall, the proposed Project would be developed at a density of 4.08 dwelling units/acre, which would be consistentunder the density standards of the PRD Permit. Pursuant to Section 19.100 of the Riverside Municipal Code, the single-family residential units that would be developed on the Project site would not exceed the base zone structure heights of 35 feet or two stories. The Project applicant is also requesting a Variance from the City of Riverside to reduce the perimeter setback from the right- of- way (ROW) line to the property/block wall at lots 1 and 17 through 23 along Lurin Avenue. The Project would be required to provide 20, 500 square feet of common park space and would meet these development standard requirements through development of a common park totaling 20,574 squarefeet on the Project site. On-site water -efficient landscapingin common areas would be provided and continuously maintained as set forth in Chapter 19.570 of the Riverside Municipal Code to increase the scenic quality of the proposed Project site. Appendix A show the conceptual landscape master plan.

The City of Riverside adoptedthe Riverside Citywide Design Guidelines and Sign Guidelines in 2007. Chapter III, Section A of the documentprovides residential design guidelines for single-family residential design. As part of the City' s entitlement process, the Project applicant is required to implement design features to comply with City requirements in providing development of scenic quality. The Project hasbeen designedto be compatible with the surrounding areaand the Project does not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations regarding scenic quality. Therefore, the proposed Project would not degrade the existing visual character of the area. Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts would be less than significant with implementation of the proposed Project and no mitigation is required. d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration ld. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025, Title 19 — Article VIII — Chapter 19.556 — Lighting, Citywide Design and Sign Guidelines; Riverside County Ordinance No. 655)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an areawith existing outdoor lighting sources. Currently, sources of nighttime light originate from surrounding residential uses, streetlights, and the single-family residential neighborhood northwest of the site. The proposed lighting on the Project site would include lighting typical of single-family residential neighborhoods, including lights from inside and outside homes, entrancelighting, accent lights on common use landscaping features, lighting at the park on the Project site, and streetlights. The proposed lighting would be directed, oriented, and shielded to prevent light from shining onto adjacent properties. Although the lighting proposed by the Project would increase lighting on the Project site, comparedto currentconditions, the lighting would not result in a substantiallight or glare increase compared to surrounding development. Any new lighting proposed or required for the Project would be constructed in accordance with Section 19.590.070- Light and Glare and the provisions of Chapter 19.556 Lighting of the City' s Municipal Code. Additionally, any exterior building materials would be constructedin accordancewith Chapter 19.710 — Design Review of the City' s Municipal Code. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant would provide the City lighting plans for review and approval. Additionally, the City' s Development Review Committee will review the proposed development to ensure exterior materials used for the construction of the single-family residential units are compliant with City guidelines prior to entitlement.

The Project applicant would comply with the outdoor lighting standardspursuantto Chapter 19.556 of the Riverside Municipal Code. As such, implementation of the proposed Project would have less than significant impacts directly, indirectly, or cumulatively that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views due to glare and lighting. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resourcesare significant environmental effects, lead agenciesmay refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site AssessmentModel ( 1997) preparedby the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information complied by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the State's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range AssessmentProject and the Forest Legacy Assessmentproject; and the forest carbonmeasurementmethodology provided in the ForestProtocols adoptedby the California Air ResourcesBoard. Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of X Statewide Importance ( Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
2a. Response: ( Source: General Plan and Supporting Documents EIR — Figure 5.2-1, California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Riverside County FTP Website) No Impact. A review of Figure 5.2-1 of the City of Riverside General Plan and Supporting Documents EIR indicated that the Project site is not designated as or adjacent to land designated as Important Farmland ( Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance). The California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program FMMP) datafor Riverside County were accessedto verify that the site was not designatedasImportant Farmland. According to the FMMP data, the Project site is designated as " Other Land ( X)." Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non- agricultural use. As such, no impact mitigation is required.
from a CEQA perspective would occur and no
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 Williamson Act contract?
2b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR — Figure 5. 2- 2 Williamson Act Preserves and Figure 5. 2- 4 — Proposed Zones Permitting Agricultural Uses, and Title 19; California Government Code Sections 51240-51257.5) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is currently located within Agricultural PreserveNo. 3 under a Williamson Act Contract; however, no agricultural productivity is occurring on the Project site. Between 1948 and 1966, the site was utilized for agricultural production. Between 1978 and 1994, a single-family residential unit and detachedgaragewere constructedon the northeasternportion of the Project site. Sometime between 2002 and 2005, the portions of the site being utilized for agricultural production were suspended. Between 2006 and 2009, a brow ditch was constructed along the easternperimeter of the site, in supportof grading that occurredon an adjacentsiteto the east. Finally, sometimearound 2014, the single-family residential unit on the site was demolished and a concreteslab foundation is the only sign of development left on the site. Basedon the history of the Project site, it has not been used for agricultural production since 2005 ( 15 years prior to the preparation of this environmental document). The applicant, aspart of the Project, is requesting a cancellation of the Agricultural PreserveNo. 3 and Active Land Conservation Contract. Upon cancellation, the project will be developedto R-1-13000 Single Family Residential Zone, which is consistent with zoning designations surrounding the site and to maintain consistency with the Riverside 2025 General Plan. The proposed Project would develop 41 single-family residential units on a parcel zoned for residential development. With the cancellation of the Agricultural Preserve and the Williamson Act Contract, the development that would occur on the site would not conflict with any existing zoning for agricultural uses.

A Williamson Act Contractwas establishedonthe Project siteonJanuary1, 1970. TheProject applicantsentthe City of Riverside a letter indicating their desirein commencing the nonrenewal of the Williamson Act Contract asrequired by Government Code Section 51245 on May 13, 2020, and the notice of nonrenewal was recorded on the Project site on June2, 2020. According to Government Code Section 51244, "if the county or city or the landowner servesnotice of intent in any year not to renew the contract, the existing contract shall remain in effect for the balance of the period remaining since the original execution or the last PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration renewalof the contract, asthe casemay be. As part of theproposedProject, the landowneris requestingthe City Council to cancel the existing Agricultural Preserveandthe Williamson Act Contract on the site asthe contract is now under nonrenewalstatus. In order for the City Council to consider cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract on the site, pursuant to Government Code Section51280 et seq., the City Council must make the following findings:

1. That the cancellation is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 7 Agricultural Land of the California Government Code. a. That the cancellation is for land on which a notice of nonrenewal has been served pursuant to Section 51245. b. That cancellation is not likely to result in the removal of adjacentlandsfrom agricultural use. c. That cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the applicable provisions of the City General Plan. d. That cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development. e. That there is no proximate noncontracted land which is both available and suitable for the use to which it is proposed the contracted land be put or, that development of the contracted land would provide more contiguous patterns of urban development than development of proximate noncontracted land.

2. That cancellation is in the public interest.

If the City Council makesthe required findings pursuantto GovernmentCodeSection51282(a) the landownerwould be required to pay a cancellation fee equalto 12.5 percentof the cancellation valuation (unrestricted fair market value) of theproperty pursuant to Government Code Section51283(b). As arequirement of Government Code Section 51280 etseq. the Williamson Act Contract cancellationpetition would then be sentby the City Council to the California Department of Conservationfor recordation. As a condition of approval, the Project applicant/landowner would be required to pay the Williamson Act cancellation fee determined by the City Council and the County of Riverside Assessor's Office.

Based on theseprocedures occurring, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with an Agricultural Preserve or a Williamson Act Contract and impacts would be less than significant. c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or causerezoning of, forest land (asdefined in Public ResourcesCodesection 12220(g)) timberland ( as defined in Public Resources Code section 0 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production ( as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
2c. Response: (Source: GIS Map — Forest Data)
No Impact. The City of Riverside has no forest land that can support 10 percent native tree cover, nor does it have any timberland. The Project site is not zoned for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production; as such, implementation of the Project would not conflict with suchzoning designations. Therefore, no impacts would occur from this Project directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required. d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use?
0 2d. Response: (Source: GIS Map — Forest Data)
No Impact. The City of Riverside has no forest land that can support 10 percent native tree cover, nor does it have any timberland. The Project siteis fully developedandis not occupiedby forestland; assuch, implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use. No impacts would occur from this Project directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use?
2e. Response: ( Source: General Plan and Supporting Documents EIR — Figure 5.2-1, California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Riverside County FTP Website; General Plan 2025 FPEIR Title 19 — Article V — Chapter 19.100 — Residential Zones — RC Zone and RA Zone and GIS Map — Forest Data)
No Impact. The California Department of ConservationFMMP datafor Riverside County were accessedto verify that the site was not designated as Important Farmland. According to the FMMP data, the Project site is designatedas "Other Land (X)." Active agricultural production has not occurred on the Project site since 1966. The Project site has a current land use designation of Low Density Residential ( LDR). Upon cancellation of Agricultural PreserveNo. 3 and the Williamson Act Contract ( as describedabove), the OSP-RA Residential Agricultural and Specific Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zone will revert to R-1-13000 Single Family Residential Zone, which would be consistent with the land use designation and zoning/land use designation of surrounding parcels. There is no forest land on site. Parcels surrounding the Project site are not designated as agricultural or forest land use; as such, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in conversion of nearby Farmland to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively related to conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

3. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
3a. Response: (Source: South CoastAir Quality Management District' s 2007 Air Quality Management Plan ( AQMP); Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Obsidian Development, LSA, November 2020 Appendix B) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin ( Basin) and is under the jurisdiction of the South CoastAir Quality ManagementDistrict ( SCAQMD). The Basin includes all of Orange County and the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The SCAQMD and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) areresponsiblefor formulating and implementing the Air Quality Management (AQMP), which hasa 20 -year horizon for the Basin. The current regional air quality plan is the Final 2016 AQMP adoptedby the SCAQMD on March 10, 2017. The Final 2016 AQMP proposespolicies and measurescurrently contemplated by responsible agenciesto achieve federal standardsfor healthful air quality in the Basin and those portions of the Salton SeaAir Basin that are under SCAQMD jurisdiction. This Final Plan also addressesseveral federal planning requirements and incorporates significant new scientific data, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, new meteorological episodes, and new air quality modeling tools. This Final Plan builds upon the approachestaken in the 2012 AQMP for the Basin for the attainmentof the federal ozoneair quality standard.1 The Basin is currently a federal and Statenonattainmentareafor particulate matter less than 10 microns in size ( PM10), particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size ( PM2. 5), and ozone.

The Final 2016 AQMP proposes attainment demonstration of the federal PM2. 5 standards through a more focused control of sulfur oxide (SOx), directly emitted PM2.5, nitrogen oxides (NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOC). Consistency with the AQMP for the Basin means that a project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and assumptions in the respective plan to achieve the federal and State air quality standards. For a project to be consistentwith the AQMP adoptedby the SCAQMD, the pollutants emitted from the project should not exceedthe SCAQMD daily threshold or causea significant impact on air quality, or the project must already havebeenincluded in the AQMP projections. However, if feasible mitigation measuresare implemented and shown to reduce the impact level from significant to less than significant, a project may be deemed consistent with the AQMP. The AQMP usesthe assumptions and projections of local planning agenciesto determine control strategies for regional compliance status. Since the AQMP is based on the local General Plan, projects that are deemed consistent with the General Plan are found to be consistent with the AQMP.

The City' s General Plan is consistentwith the SCAG Regional ComprehensivePlan Guidelines and the SCAQMD AQMP. The proposedProject includes41 single-family residentialunits, apark, andinternal neighborhoodroadson approximately 10.06 acres.

Based on the household size of 2. 86 persons per residential unit used in the California Emissions Estimator Model ( CaIEEMod) v2016.3.2, the proposedProject could increasethe City' spopulation by approximately 117persons.

Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency for project development proposals that differ from the land use designation assumed within the Basin' s 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project: (1) it doesnot increasethe frequencyor severity of an air quality standardsviolation or causea new violation; and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Consistency review is presented below:

1. While the project with mitigation measures would result in short- term construction pollutant emissions that are all less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by SCAQMD, operational pollutant emissions would be less than SCAQMD significance thresholds; therefore, the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of an air quality standardsviolation and would not causea new air quality standardviolation.

2. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook guidelines indicate that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects. Significant projects include airports, electrical -generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil -drilling districts, Final 2013 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, February 2014.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration water ports, solid -waste disposal sites, and offshore drilling facilities; therefore, the proposed Project is not defined as significant.

With respect to the first criterion, criteria pollutants during construction and operation of the proposed Project would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the Ambient Air Quality Standards. Because the proposed Project would not introduce any substantial stationary sourcesof emissions, carbon monoxide ( CO) is the preferred benchmark pollutant for assessinglocal area pollutant impacts from post -construction motor vehicle operations. No intersections would require a CO hot -spotanalysis, andimpactswould belessthan significant. Therefore, theproposedProject would not increasethe frequency or severity of an existing CO violation or causeor contribute to new CO violations.

With respectto the secondcriterion for determining consistencywith AQMP growth assumptions, theprojections in the AQMP for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions in SCAG' s 2016 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) regarding population, housing, and growth trends. According to the 2016 RTP/ SCS, the forecast population for the Riverside County subregion in 2040 is approximately 3,167,584 persons. In 2022, the projected occupancy year of the proposed Project, the Riverside County subregion is anticipated to have a population of approximately 2,471,192 persons. Therefore, the forecastpopulation for the Riverside County subregion would grow by approximately 851,146persons between 2018 and 2040. The proposed Project' s 41 single-family homes would introduce an estimated net residential population of approximately 117 persons, basedon the household size of 2.86 persons per unit for housing units. Thus, Project residents would account for 0.01 percent of the population growth forecastby SCAG in Riverside County subregion between 2018 and 2040. Because similar projections form the basis of the 2016 AQMP, it can be concluded that the proposed Project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP.

SCAG foreseesthat population would increase in the City and region over the next 25 years, and the anticipated population growth rate in the City ( 2.4 percent) is roughly similar to that of Riverside County ( 2.0 percent) and the SCAG region ( 2.5 percent) for the sameperiod. Becausethe Project site hasbeen designatedfor residential usesby the City, theproposed increase in population by approximately 117personshasbeenanticipatedandplannedfor in the City' s GeneralPlan. Furthermore, as discussedbelow in Checklist Question 3b, the project -specific short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions would be lessthan the emission thresholds established in the SCAQMD' s CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standardsviolation and would not causea new air quality standard violation. Through adherence to standard SCAQMD regional rules required for all development activity with the Basin that assist in reducing air pollutant emissions, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard?
X El
3b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Table 5. 3- B SCAQMD CEQA Regional Significance Thresholds, South Coast Air Quality Management District' s 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, URBEMIS 2007 Model or Ca1EEMod 2017 Model, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Obsidian Development, LSA, November 2020 Appendix B)
Less Than Significant Impact. The information in this section is basedon the Air Quality impact analysisthat was conducted in theAir Quality and GreenhouseGasAnalysis Technical Report prepared for the Project by LSA ( November 2020).

Construction Analysis
Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources (e.g., demolition, site preparation, grading, utility engines, tenant improvements, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew). Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily asconstruction activity levels change. The useof construction equipment on the Project site would result in localized exhaust emissions.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration The construction calculations prepared for the Project assumedthat dust control measures (watering a minimum of three times daily) would be employed to reduce emissions of fugitive dust during site grading. Further, all construction would need to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding emission of fugitive dust. The most recent version of CatEEMod ( Version 2016. 3. 2) was used to calculate the construction emissions. Table C: Estimated Construction Emissions shows the estimated construction emissions and the determination if generation of such emissions exceeds SCAQMD thresholds. No exceedances of any criteria pollutants are expected during construction; therefore, project -related short-term construction air quality impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Table C: Estimated Construction Emissions
Total Regional Pollutant Emissions ( lbs/ day)
Fugitive Exhaust Fugitive Exhaust
Construction Phase VOC NOx CO SOx PMio PMio PM2. 5 PM2. 5 Demolition 3. 39 33. 35 22. 38 0. 04 0. 20 1.66 0. 05 1. 54 Site Preparation 4. 17 42. 48 22. 25 0. 04 7. 25 2. 20 3. 93 2. 02 Grading 4. 55 50. 26 32. 77 0. 06 3. 61 2. 18 1.46 2. 00 Building Construction 2. 21 19. 66 17. 56 0. 03 0. 19 1. 12 0. 05 1. 05 Paving 1.32 12. 96 15. 22 0. 02 0. 17 0. 68 0. 04 0. 62 Architectural Coating 23. 31 1.42 1. 92 0. 00 0. 02 0. 08 0. 01 0. 08 Peak Daily 2331 50. 26 32. 77 0. 06 9. 45 5. 95
SCAQMD Thresholds 75. 00 100. 00 550. 00 150. 00 150. 00 55. 00 Significant Emissions? No No No No No No
Source: LSA, Air Quality and GreenhouseGasAnalysis Technical Report, Table I, pg. 40, February 2020.

CO = carbon monoxide lbs/day = poundsper day
NOx = nitrogen oxides PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM, o = particulate matter less than 10 microns m size SCAQMD = SouthCoastAir Quality ManagementDistrict SOx = sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds
Fugitive Dust: Fugitive dust emissions are generally associatedwith land clearing and exposureof soils to the air and wind, aswell ascut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generatedduring construction varies substantially on aproject -by -project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and weather conditions at the time of construction. The proposed Project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust.

Architectural Coatings: Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are part of the ozone precursors. Based on the uses associated with the proposed Project, it is estimated that application of the architectural coatings for the proposed peak construction day would result in a peak of 23.31 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOCs. Therefore, VOC emission from this task would not exceedSCAQMD VOC establishedthresholds of 75 lbs/day.

Naturally Occurring Asbestos: The proposedProject is located in Riverside County, which is among the California counties found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. However, according to the California Geologic Survey mapping of the Project site, no suchrock hasbeenidentified in the Project vicinity. As such, the potential risk for natural occurring asbestos during Project construction is lessthan significant.

Operational Analysis
Long- term air pollutant emissions impacts are those associatedwith stationary sources and mobile sources involving project - related changes. The proposed Project would result in net increases in both stationary -and -mobile source emissions. The stationary -sourceemissionswould come from many sources, including the useof consumerproducts, landscaping equipment, general energy, and solid waste.

Based on the Trip Generation Memorandum (July 2019), the proposed project would generateapproximately 387 trips per day. The project' saveragedaily trips were enteredin the CatEEMod. The resultsareshown in Table D: Regional Operational PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Emissions, which demonstrates that none of the criteria pollutants would exceed SCAQMD emission thresholds. Therefore, project -related long-term air quality impacts would be lessthan significant and no mitigation is required.

Table D: Regional Operational Emissions
Source
Pollutant Em ssions, lbs/ day
VOC NOx CO SOx PMio PM2. 5
Area 1. 69 0. 04 3. 39 0. 01 0. 02 0. 02
Energy 0. 02 0. 18 0. 08 0. 01 0. 01 0. 02
Mobile 0. 07 3. 53 9. 42 0. 04 2. 98 0. 82
Total Project Emissions 2. 41 3. 75 12. 88 0. 04 3. 01 0. 85 SCAQMD Thresholds 55. 00 55. 00 550. 00 150. 00 150. 00 55. 00 Significant? No No No No No No
Source: LSA, Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Technical Report, Table K, pg. 42, February 2020.

CO = carbon monoxide PM, o = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size lbs/day = poundsper day SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District NOx = nitrogen oxides SOx = sulfur oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size VOC = volatile organic compounds Localized Impacts: Ca1EEMod was used to calculate localized nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide ( CO), PM10, and PM2.5 pollutant concentrations for Project operational activities. Table E: Operational Localized Impacts Analysis shows that the operational emissions rates would not exceed the localized significance thresholds ( LSTs) for residents in the Project area.

Localized impacts analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the Ca1EEModoutputs do not separateon-site and off- site emissionsfor mobile sources. Motor vehicle emissionsareestimatedbasedon the averagetrip length for residential land uses.

The averagetrip length usedin the Ca1EEModdoesnot break down the portion of the motor vehicle emissionsgeneratedon site. For a worst- case scenario vehicle emission assessment of the mobile source, the emissions shown in Table E include all on- site Project - related area sources and 5 percent of the Project - related new mobile sources, which is an estimate of the amount of Project -related new vehicle traffic that would occur on site. During operation, the proposed Project would not exceedNOx, CO, PMio, or PM2.5thresholds. Therefore, the proposed operational activity would not result in a locally significant air quality impact. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Table E: Operational Localized Impacts Analysis
Emissions Sources NOx ( lbs/ day) CO ( lbs/ day) PMio ( lbs/ day) PM2.5 (lbs/ day) Maximum On- site Emissions 0. 2 3. 9 0. 2 0. 1
LST - 5 -acre site 270 1,577 4. 0 2. 0
Significant Emissions? No No No No
Source: LSA, Air Quality and GreenhouseGasAnalysis Technical Report, Table L, pg. 43, May 2020.

Note: SourceReceptorArea - Metropolitan Riverside County, 5 acres, receptorsat lessthan 25 meters (82.02 feet).

CO = carbon monoxide PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size LST = localized significance threshold PM, o = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size NOx = nitrogen oxides
Long - Term Microscale ( CO Hot Spot) Analysis: Vehicular trips associated with the proposed Project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segmentsin the Project vicinity. Localized air quality impacts would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed Project. The primary mobile -source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, this, of traffic flow conditions. Typically, high CO concentrations areassociatedwith roadways or intersectionsoperating at unacceptablelevels of service or with extremely high traffic volumes. In areaswith high ambient background CO concentrations, modeling is recommended to determine a project' s effect on local CO levels. Since the SCAQMD modeled intersections do not exceed the CO standards, intersections within the proposed Project study areawith lessvolumes of traffic and under lessextreme conditions would not exceedthe CO standards.

Buildout of the proposed Project would not produce the volume of traffic, as described above, required to generate a CO hot PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration spot. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not be expected to result in CO hot spots, and impacts would be less than significant.

The Project would contribute to criteria pollutants to the area during Project construction. A number of individual projects in the areamay beunder construction simultaneously with the proposed Project. Depending on construction schedulesand actual implementation of projects in the area, generation of fugitive dust and pollutant emissions during construction could result in substantial short-term increases in air pollutants. However, each project would be required to comply with the SCAQMD' s standard construction measures. The proposed Project' s short- term construction CO, nitrogen dioxide, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions would not exceed the LSTs. Therefore, construction of the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact with regard to regional and localized emissions and impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. As a result, the proposed Project doesnot result in any new significant impacts that were not previously evaluated and for which a statement of overriding considerations was adopted aspart of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR. Therefore, cumulative air quality emissions impacts are less than significant. No mitigation is required. c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
0 3c. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Table 5. 3- B SCAQMD CEQA Regional Significance Thresholds, South CoastAir Quality Management District' s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, CaIEEMod, EMFAC 2017 Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Obsidian Development, LSA, November 2020 Appendix B) Less Than Significant Impact. The closest sensitive receptorsto the Project site are single-family residential homes, located approximately 45 feet north of the Project at 18810 Lurin Avenue. Table F: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis identifies the emissions thresholds for local pollutants based on the nearest sensitive receptors. This area is consistent with the anticipated intensity of construction and based on the number of pieces of construction equipment to be used.

Table F: Construction Localized Impacts Analysis
Pollutant Emissions
Emissions Sources NOx CO PMIo PMz. s
On - Site Construction Emissions 50 32 8. 0 4. 8
LST — 4 acres 237 1,346 11. 0 6. 7
Significant Emissions No No No No
Source: LSA, Air Quality and GreenhouseGasAnalysis Technical Report, Table J, pg. 41, May 2020.

Note: Source Receptor Area -Metropolitan Riverside County, 4 acres, receptors at 25 meters.

CO = carbon monoxide PM25 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size lbs/day = poundsper day PK() = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size NOx = nitrogen oxides LST = localized significance threshold Table F shows that daily construction emissions would not exceedthe daily thresholds and the air quality standardsof the VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PMI°, and PM2.5pollutant emission thresholds established by the SCAQMD. No additional mitigation is required for the construction equipment.

In conformance with the General Plan 2025 FPEIR Mitigation Measure AIR 1 and Mitigation Measure AIR 7, Ca1EEMod analyzed short-term construction and long-term operational related impacts of the Project and determined that the proposed Project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for short-term construction and long- term operational impacts. Therefore, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations and a less than significant impact would occur directly, indirectly, or cumulatively for this project. No mitigation is required. d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
0 PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 3d. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Table 5. 3- B SCAQMD CEQA Regional Significance Thresholds, South Coast Air Quality Management District' s 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, Ca1EEMod, EMFAC 2017 Model and Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Obsidian Development, LSA, November 2020 Appendix B) Less Than Significant Impact. Construction equipment exhaust, the application of architectural coatings, and the installation of asphalt surfacesmay create odors in the Project vicinity during its construction. These construction activities are of a temporary duration and would not occur after completion of construction. The Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 standardsfor paint applications and Rule 1108 standardsregarding application of asphalt as a matter of regulatory policy.

Land uses generally associated with long- term ( i.e., operational) objectionable odors include agricultural uses, wastewater treatmentplants, food processingplants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and/or various heavy industrial uses. The proposed Project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in a potentially significant operational - source odor impact. Potential sources of project - generated operational odors include disposal of miscellaneous domestic refuse. Consistent with City requirements, all project -generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in accordance with solid waste regulations, thereby precluding substantial generation of odors that could result from temporary holding of refuse on site. Additionally, the proposed Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which regulates nuisance odors.

Through compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1108, 1113, and 402, the Project would not involve any substantial short-term or long- term sources of odors. Direct, indirect, or cumulative Project impacts are considered less than significant and no mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverseeffect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
4a. Response: (Source: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Multiple SpeciesHabitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis and General Biological Assessmentfor Tentative Tract No. 37733a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; Step I Habitat Assessment, Step II, Part A Focused Burrow Survey and Step II, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) -Update on Burrowing Owl Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C)
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ( MSHCP) ConsistencyAnalysis and General Biological Assessmentwas prepared by TERACOR ResourceManagement, Inc., June 7, 2020, to ensure the proposed Project was consistent with the Western Riverside County MSHCP and to analyze potential impacts to biological resources.

The Project site is located within the boundaries of the MSHCP. All projects within the MSHCP are required to analyze their consistency with the MSHCP, including conducting analysesof specieson designatedparcels acrossthe Plan Area, such as criteria area/narrow endemic plant species, or animals like burrowing owl. These analyses usually include preparation of specific habitat assessmentsfor target organisms. If a given property is found to be suitable for specified speciesto occur, then focused surveys are often required for the specific species. The Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ( RCA) MSHCP Information Map outlines, on a parcel -by -parcel basis, those properties which require habitat assessmentand focused surveys. The only speciesrequiring specific analysisfor the Project site is the burrowing owl. When development or aproperty is proposed, the City of Riverside is also required to consult the Regional Conservation Authority' sMSHCP Information Map to determine the following:

If aproperty is locatedwithin a MSHCP-designatedCell Group or Criteria Cell (which the Project site is not); and If it is in either a Cell or Cell Group, then there would be a ConservationDescription which outlines how conservation should be organized in that particular area ( not applicable to the Project site).

A focused habitat suitability assessmentwas conducted on the Project site on July 31, 2019, to evaluate the on-site biological resources to determine if 1) suitable burrowing owl ( Athene cunicularia) ( BUOW) habitat is present on the site and 2) determine if any burrows on-site could potentially be utilized by BUOW. No BUOW were observed during the courseof four focused surveys on the Project site and no primary or secondary/evidence of BUOW occupation was detected on the site.

Additionally, no owls were observedat off- site locations near the proposed Project site.

The Project site is located on a vacant site within a semi -urbanized area of the City of Riverside. A search of the MSHCP database and other appropriate databases identified potential for candidate, sensitive, or special - status species, or suitable habitat for such species to occur on site. Federal Species of Concern, California Species of Special Concern, and California SpeciesAnimal or Plantson lists 1-4 of the California Native Plant Society Inventory may alsohavethe potential to be located on the Project site. Table 3 - MSHCP Covered Species of the General Biological Assessment and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan lists MSHCP Covered Speciesthat have been designatedaspresent, not present, or potentially occurring low, moderate, high potential) on the Project site. As the Project site was utilized for agricultural purposes, the on- site habitat is disturbed and supports non-native grasses and herbs. These grassland areas have a low value for sedentary wildlife and moderate value for raptors still foraging in the area, including hawks and nocturnal owls. The ornamental trees on site provide perching habitat for red-tailed hawk (Buteojamaicensis), red -shoulderedhawk (Buteo lineatus), and Cooper'shawk (Accipiter PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration cooperii), though only red-tailed hawk and Cooper'shawk were detectednearthe Project site. No on-site raptor nesting would be expecteddueto the relatively small sizeof treeson site. During the surveysconductedin 2019, anumber of wildlife species were detected on the Project site. These species include red- tailed hawk, Cooper' s hawk, lesser goldfinch ( Spinus psaltria), California scrubjay ( Aphelocoma californica), house finch ( Haemorhous mexicanus), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), common raven ( Corvus corax), western fence lizard ( Sceloporus occidentalis), common side - blotched lizard ( Uta stansburiana), coyote ( Canis latrans), opossum ( Didelphis virginiana), and bat species such as western yellow bat ( Lasiurus xanthinus) andwesternmastiff bat (Eumopsperotis californicus). Additionally, there are a couple of speciesof white-footed mice that could still occur on site relictually ( Peromyscus sp.), California kingsnake ( Lampropeltis californiae), southern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus helleri), western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), and Pacific tree frog (Pseudacris regilla).

Project -associatedimpacts within the MSHCP aretypically offset and mitigated via a number of processes. When projects are within Criteria Cells, various combinations of fee -payment, land dedication/ purchase, and other mechanisms as applicable can be utilized to offset impacts to sensitive species and habitats of all types, but the Project site is not within a Criteria Cell or Cell Group. Someproject areasare required to survey for specific biological resources, suchasburrowing owls or fairy shrimp.

Focused survey were conducted in 2019 for burrowing owl, with negative results and no owls were detected. The proposed Project is not within a Criteria Cell; therefore, there are no outright land dedications required. There are no burrowing owls present; therefore, at this time, no specific BUOW- related mitigation is necessary.

The Project site is located within the California Floristic Province Southwestern California region. One semi - natural, recognized vegetative cover occurs on the Project site: annual non- native brome grassland. Table G: Vegetation Communities shows the type of vegetative communities that currently exist on the Project site.

Table G: Vegetation Communities
Vegetation Community Size of Community on the Project Site (acres) Disturbed Annual Non - Native Grassland 9. 64
Ornamental Alliance 0. 16
Developed/ Roadway 0. 27
Total 10. 07
Source: TERACOR ResourceManagement Inc., MSHCP ConsistencyAnalysis and General Biological Assessmentfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, Table2.

Project implementation would result in the permanent removal of 10. 07 acres of natural and semi - natural habitat as shown in Table G. Of the 10. 07 acres, most of it consists of disturbed upland habitat comprised of annual brome grasslands, mustard field, and ornamental trees. Removal of thesevegetative communities may potentially affect sensitive plant and animal species which are State, federally, and MSHCP protected. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO -1 through BIO -4 would reduce impacts to a less than significant level under CEQA.

Mitigation Measures
BIO - 1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall make the appropriate mitigation fee payment into the MSHCP Stephens' kangaroo rat fee payment program for conservation of Stephens' kangaroo rat - occupied habitats in order to offset the loss of potentially suitable Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat on site through project implementation.

BIO - 2: Prior to on- site vegetation clearance, the Project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre - construction nesting bird survey in accordancewith the following:

The survey shall be conducted no more than three daysprior to the initiation of clearance/construction work.

If pre - construction surveys indicate that bird nests are not present or are inactive, or if potential habitat is unoccupied, no further mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration If active nests of birds are found during the surveys, a species-specific no -disturbance buffer zone shall be established by a qualified biologist around active nests until said qualified biologist determines that all young have fledged ( i. e., are no longer reliant upon the nest).

It is recommended that coordination between the developer of the site, the City of Riverside, the project engineer, and the consulting qualified biologist to consider vegetation clearanceoutside of the normal bird nesting season usually February 15 through September 15) to avoid impacts to nesting birds that would potentially violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It should be noted that bird nesting seasonis increasingly less definitive for some year-round resident species, such as hummingbirds and raptors. Further, ground -dwelling birds such as burrowing owls, can be affected nearly any time of the year if present. It is therefore advisable to conduct a pre - construction bird survey no matter the time of year.

Removal of vegetation necessitates installation of appropriate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) measures, particularly if grading is not undertaken immediately; therefore, careful timing of the Project schedule and implementation measures is necessary to avoid water quality impacts.

BIO -3: The Project applicant shall retain aqualified biologist to conduct a 30 -day pre -construction survey for burrowing owl.

The results of the single one -day survey shall be submitted to the City prior to obtaining a grading permit. If burrowing owl are not detected during the pre -construction survey, no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owl arc detected during the pre -construction survey, the Project applicant and a qualified consulting biologist will be required to prepare and submit for approval a burrowing owl -relocation program.

BIO -4: In accordancewith MSHCP provisions limiting the use of exotic and invasive plant species, the Project' s landscape plan shall exclude invasive species such as, but not limited to crimson fountain grass ( Pennisetum setaceum), Pampas grass ( Cortaderia selloana), giant reed ( Arundo donax), tree of heaven ( Ailanthus altissima), eucalyptus ( Eucalyptus sp.), and other ornamental landscape elements on the list of exotic invasive plants utilized by the Riverside Conservation Authority that have the potential to spreadinto adjoining, downstream, or nearby areas.

With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO - 1 through BIO - 4, the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special statusspeciesin local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Depaitiuent of Fish andWildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
4b. Response: ( Source: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., MSHCP Consistency Analysis and General Biological Assessmentfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; Step I Habitat Assessment, Step II, Part A Focused Burrow Survey and Step II, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 Gross Acres ( 9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) - Update on BUOW Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C).

Less Than Significant Impact. Section 6. 1.2 of the MSHCP requires assessment of impacts to riparian habitats, riverine areas, andvernal pools, including focusedsurveysfor sensitiveriparian bird andfairy shrimp specieswhen suitablehabitat is present. The intent of the assessmentrequirement is to provide for the protection of resourcesusedby MSHCP- coveredspecies, aswell asexisting and future downstream conservation areas. Riverine/riparian areasand vernal pools are defined in Section

6.1.2 of the MSHCP as follows: Riparian/ Riverine Areas are lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent, or emergentmossesand lichens, which occur close to or which dependupon soil moisturefrom a nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh waterflow during all or aportion of theyear.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Fieldwork on the Project site in 2019 concluded that the property is at the top of the local watershed. As such, it receives no substantiverunoff from adjacentparcels. Further, on-site soils consist exclusively of sandyloams that drain well and generally slope broadly from northwest to southeast. Historic mechanical rearrangement of the surface soils occurred when the past citrus grove was installed, and those modifications may have been the stimulus for colonization by non-native pepper trees and other non- native trees.

There were no vernal pools located on the Project site during field investigations. The sandy loam soils on site are not conducive to ponding and there was no evidence acrossthe property any location on the site ponded. Soils on site are shallow and underlain by granitic basement rock which, when subsurface water comes into contact with it, conducts water laterally and downward via hydraulic pressure and gravitational forces. As no vernal pools were located on site, vernal pool - associated species were also absent on site.

As such, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitivenatural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, andregulations or by the California Departmentof Fish and Wildlife or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally - protected wetlands ( including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
10 101 X
4c. Response: ( Source: TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., MSHCP Consistency Analysis and General Biological Assessmentfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; Step I Habitat Assessment, Step II, Part A Focused Burrow Survey and StepH, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 Gross Acres ( 9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) - Update on BUOW Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C).

No Impact. Section 6. 1.2 of the MSHCP requires assessment of impacts to riparian habitats, riverine areas, and vernal pools, including focused surveysfor sensitiveriparian bird and fairy shrimp specieswhen suitable habitat is present. The intent of the assessmentrequirement is to provide for the protection of resourcesusedby MSHCP-covered species, aswell as existing and future downstream conservation areas. Riverine/ riparian areas and vernal pools are defined in Section 6. 1.2 of the MSHCP as follows: Vernal pools are seasonal wetlands that occur in depression areas that have wetlands indicators of all three parameters ( soils, vegetation and hydrology) during the wetter portion of the growing season but normally lack wetlands indicators of hydrology and/or vegetation during thedrier portion of thegrowing season. Obligate hydrophytes andfacultative wetlands plant speciesare normally dominant during the drier portion of thegrowing season. The determination that an area exhibits vernal pool characteristics, and the definition of the watershedsupporting vernal pool hydrology, mustbe madeon a case-by-case basis. Such determinations should consider the length of the time the area exhibits upland and wetland characteristics and the manner in which the areafits into the overall ecological systemas a wetland. Evidence concerning the persistence of an area's wetnesscan be obtainedfrom its history, vegetation, soils, and drainage characteristics, usesto which it hasbeensubjected, and weatherand hydrologic records. For Riverside, vernalpool and SantaRosafairy shrimp, mapping of stockponds, ephemeralpools and otherfeatures shall also be undertakenasdetermined appropriate by a qualified biologist.

Field surveys conducted on the Project site and historic aerial photo analysis concluded that no streams, drainages, ditches, ponds, pools, or other surface waters that might fall under the regulatory authority of regional, State, and federal agencies occur onsite. No authorizations from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is necessarysince the Project site contains no surface water features, no pond or vernal pools, or any other features regulated by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Since there are no federal "waters" of the U. S. presently on site, it is not necessaryto issue a Section 401 Water Quality Certification under the Federal Clean Water Act. There are also no State regulated streambeds or water features on site that would be altered or directly affected or removed as a result of Project implementation. Finally, a Notification of Lake or StreambedAlteration PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration document/ application is not required from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife ( CDFW) as there are no streambeds, no drainages, no creeks, no rivers, no ponds, no lakes, or no pools on site that are regulated by the CDFW.

Based on the absence of water features on the site, implementation of the proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally -protected wetlands ( including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means. No impact would occur and no mitigation measuresare required. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the useof native wildlife nursery sites?
101
4d. Response: ( Source: MSHCP, General Plan 2025 — Figure OS - 7 — MSHCP Cores and Linkage; TERACOR ResourceManagement, Inc., MSHCP ConsistencyAnalysis and General Biological Assessmentfor Tentative Tract No. 37733a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07Net Acres) into 40Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; StepI Habitat Assessment, StepIl, PartA Focused Burrow Survey and StepII, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) - Update on BUOW Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Habitat fragmentation occurs when a single, contiguous habitat area is divided into two or more areas, or where an action isolates the two or more new areas from each other. Isolation of habitat occurs when wildlife cannot move freely from one portion of the habitat to another or to/from one habitat type to another.

Habitat fragmentation may occur when aportion of one or more habitatsis convertedto anotherhabitat, aswhen scrubhabitats areconverted into annualgrasslandhabitat becauseof frequent burning. Wildlife movement includes seasonalmigration along corridors, as well as daily movements for foraging. Examples of migration corridors may include areas of unobstructed movementfor deer, riparian corridors providing cover for migrating birds, routesbetweenbreeding watersandupland habitat for amphibians, andbetween roosting and feeding areasfor birds.

The Project site is located in the Orangecrest Specific Plan, an area undergoing expanding urbanization due to increase population and development pressures in the City and County of Riverside. As such, the Project site is not located in an area to serve as a movement or migratory corridor, and the MSHCP did not specify any critical habitat connectivity, constrained or otherwise, in the immediate area of the Project site. The nearest intended connective habitat areas to the proposed Project is the Sycamore Canyon Wildness Park habitat area, 3. 5 miles to the northeast of the Project site. Sycamore Canyon is a different watershedthan the Project site, which is in the Mockingbird Canyon watershed. Recentgrading to the eastand development to the north and south of the Project site precludes overland connectivity between the Project areaand conservedlands to its northeast. The General Biological Assessmentand MSHCP Consistency Analysis prepared for the Project concluded that no evidence was found to support the possibility that the Project site functions as a corridor or movement pathway for any MSHCP- covered animals.

The Project site is occupied with ornamental trees that have the potential to provide areasfor nesting birds. However, raptor nesting is not expected dueto the relatively small size of the ornamental treeson site. During the bird breeding season (typically February 1through August 31), large treeson or adjacentto the Project site may be usedby hawks, ravens, or other large birds for nesting. Trees, shrubs, and other vegetation on site may provide nest sites for smaller birds, and burrowing owls may nest in ground squirrel burrows or some similar feature ( however, response 4a above indicates that burrowing owl were not observed on the Project site during field visits). Nesting bird specieswith potential to occur are protected by California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800, and by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act ( 16 USC 703-711). These laws regulate the take, possession, or destruction of the nest or eggsof any migratory bird or bird of prey. However, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service has recently determined that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act should apply only to "... affirmative actions that have astheir purpose the taking or killing of migratory birds, their nests, or their eggs" and would not be applied to incidental take of migratory birds pursuant to otherwise lawful activities. To avoid potential effects to fully protected raptors, special -statusbird species, and other nesting birds protected by the California Fish and Game Code, and for compliance with MSHCP Incidental Take Permit Condition 5, Stateregulations require a nesting bird pre -construction survey to be conducted by a qualified biologist three days prior to ground -disturbing activities. Should nesting birds be found, an PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration exclusionary buffer would be establishedby the qualified biologist. The buffer may be up to 500 feet in diameter depending on the speciesof nestingbird found. This buffer would be clearly marked in the field by construction personnelunder guidance of the qualified biologist and construction or clearing would not be conducted within this zone until the qualified biologist determinesthat the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Nesting bird habitat within the biological study area would be resurveyed during bird breeding seasonif there is a lapse in construction activities longer than seven days. The nesting bird pre -construction survey will be implemented through Mitigation Measure BIO -2 as described above.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -2 would ensurethat nesting birds in the Project area are not disturbed during construction activities. Direct, indirect, or cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X
4e. Response: ( Source: MSHCP, Title 16 Section 16. 72. 040 — Establishing the Western Riverside County MSHCP Mitigation Fee, Title 16 Section 16. 40. 040 — Establishing a Threatened and Endangered Species Fees, City of Riverside Urban Forest Tree Policy Manual; MSHCP, General Plan 2025 —Figure OS -7 — MSHCP Cores and Linkage; TERACOR ResourceManagement, Inc., MSHCP ConsistencyAnalysis and GeneralBiological Assessment for Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres ( 9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; StepI Habitat Assessment, StepII, Part A FocusedBurrow Surveyand Step II, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family ResidentialLots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR ResourceManagement, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) - Update on BUOW Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C) Less Than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project is subject to all applicable federal, State, and local policies and regulations related to the protection of biological resources and tree preservation. Additionally, the Project is required to comply with Riverside Municipal Code 16.72.040 establishing the MSHCP mitigation fee and Section 16.40 establishing the Threatened and Endangered Species Fees. Construction of the proposed Project would require the removal of ornamental trees on site; however, the Project would not be subject to the Riverside Urban TreePolicy Manual pertaining to tree removal as noneof the ornamentaltreesis locatedwithin aCity -ownedright-of-way. Implementation of the proposedProject would have a lessthan significant impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively related to local policies or ordinancesprotecting biological resources. No mitigation is required.
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
4f. Response: ( Source: MSHCP, General Plan 2025 — Figure OS - 6 — Stephen' s Kangaroo Rat ( SKR) Core Reserve and Other Habitat Conservation Plans, Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan, Lake Mathews Multiple SpeciesHabitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan, and El Sobrante Landfill Habitat Conservation Plan; MSHCP, General Plan 2025 — Figure OS - 7 — MSHCP Cores and Linkage; TERACOR ResourceManagement, Inc., MSHCP ConsistencyAnalysis and GeneralBiological Assessmentfor TentativeTract No. 37733a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07Net Acres) into 40Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; StepI Habitat Assessment StepII, PartA FocusedBurrow Survey and StepII, Part B FocusedBurrowing Owl Surveyfor Tentative Tract No. 37733 a Subdivision of 10.07 GrossAcres (9.07 Net Acres) into 40 Single Family Residential Lots in the City of Riverside, June 7, 2020; TERACOR Resource Management, Inc., Tentative Tract No. 37733 ( Obsidian) - Update on BUOW Report, September 28, 2020 Appendix C) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is located within a semi - urbanized portion of Riverside and is located within the MSHCP; therefore, the Project is subject to applicable provisions of the MSHCP as specified in Checklist Responses 4a, 4b, 4c, and 4d above. The MSHCP provides for the assembly of a Conservation Area consisting of Core Areas and Linkages for the conservationof covered species. The ConservationArea is to be assembled from portions of the MSHCP Criteria Area, which consist of quarter -section (i.e., approximately 160 -acre) Criteria Cells, each PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration with specific criteria for the species conservation within that cell. The Project site is not within the MSHCP Criteria Area; therefore, no Cell or Criteria analysis is required. There are no burrowing owls present on site; therefore, at this time, no specific burrowing owl mitigation measures are necessary. The proposed Project would affect MSHCP- covered plant and animal species as described above under Thresholds 4a, 4b, 4c, and 4d; however, such impacts are what the MSHCP anticipated and offsets the impact through fee payments.

Project implementation would result in the permanent removal of 10. 07 acres of natural and semi - natural habitat as shown in Table G. Of the 10.07 acres, most of it consistsof disturbed upland habitat consisting of annual brome grasslands, mustard field, and ornamental trees. In order to reduce impacts to biological resourcesprotected by the MSHCP, Mitigation Measures BIO - 1 through BIO - 4 would be implemented, which would reduce direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts to a level that is less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064. 5 of the CEQA
Guidelines?
5a. Response: ( Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Table 5. 5- A Historical Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Areas and Appendix D, Title 20 of the Riverside Municipal Code; Cultural Resources Assessment Lurin Obsidian Tract Project, November 2020, Appendix D of this IS/MND )
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A Cultural Resources Assessment, November 2020, was prepared for the proposed Project to provide the City of Riverside the necessary information and analysis to determine, as mandated by CEQA, whether the proposed Project would causesubstantial adverse changesto any historical resourcesthat may exist in or around the Project site. A large standing metal building, associated barbecue and patio, recent agricultural shed and appurtenance slabs, apiary debris, substantial landscape debris ( coarse mulch and wood), and modern refuse were found on the Project site during field review activities conducted in January2020.

A records searchwas conducted in January 2020, which revealed 52 cultural resource studiespreviously conducted within one mile of the proposed Project, none of which included any portion of the Project site. Although no resourceshavebeenrecorded within the Project area, 34 havebeendocumentedwithin one mile, including archaeological (prehistoric bedrock milling slicks and prehistoric bedrock milling stations) and built environment ( historic residences, a ranch complex, and former military barracks) resources. The nearestprehistoric resourceis abedrock milling feature (33-013836/CA-RIV- 007563) approximately 250 feet east of the Project site.

Although no cultural resourceshave beenpreviously documentedwithin or adjacent to the Project site and survey results were negative, due to the poor surface visibility and the presence of more than 25 prehistoric resources within a mile, the Project site retains potential for surface and subsurface resources. As such, Mitigation Measure CUL - 1 shall be implemented to reduce any historical resourcesthat may be uncovered on site during Project construction activities.

Mitigation Measures
CUL -1: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring. At least 30 days prior to application for a grading permit and before any grading, excavation, and/or ground -disturbing activities take place, the developer/applicant shall retain a Secretary of Interior Standards -qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

1. The project archaeologist, in consultationwith consulting tribes, the Developer, and the City, shall develop an Archaeological Monitoring Plan to addressthe details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeologicaland cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The development of a schedule in coordination with the developer/ applicant and the project archaeologist for designated Native American Tribal Monitors from the consulting tribes during grading, excavation, and ground -disturbing activities on the site, including the scheduling, safetyrequirements, duties, scopeof work, and Native American Tribal Monitors' authority to stop and redirect grading activities in coordination with all project archaeologists;
c. The protocols and stipulations that the Applicant, tribes, and project archaeologist/ paleontologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resourcesdiscoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits, or nonrenewable paleontological resources that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation; d. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural and paleontological resources, sacred sites, and human remains if discovered on the project site; and
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration e. The scheduling and timing of the Cultural Sensitivity Training noted in Mitigation Measure CUL - 4.

Implementation of the proposed Project would result in aless than significant impact with mitigation incorporated dircctly, indirectly, or cumulatively to a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064. 5 of the CEQA Guidelines?
5b. Response: ( Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 5- 1 - Archaeological Sensitivity and Figure 5.5-2 — Prehistoric Cultural Resources Sensitivity, Appendix D — Cultural Resources Study; Cultural Resources Assessment Lurin Obsidian Tract Project, February 2020, Appendix D of this IS/MND) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A records searchwas conducted in January2020, which revealed 52 cultural resource studiespreviously conducted within one mile of the proposed Project, none of which included any portion of the Project site. Although no resources have been recorded within the Project area, 34 have been documented within one mile, including archaeological (prehistoric bedrock milling slicks and prehistoric bedrock milling stations) and built environment historic residences, a ranch complex, and former military barracks) resources. The nearest prehistoric resource is a bedrock milling feature (33-013836/CA-RIV- 007563) approximately 250 feet eastof the Project site.

The proposed Project would be required to comply with all applicable regulations protecting archaeological resources and would be conditioned to ceaseexcavation or construction activities if archaeological resourcesare identified during execution of the Project. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1 would ensure that the proposed Project will comply with applicable regulations protecting undiscovered archaeological resources on the site. Therefore, impacts related to previously undiscoveredarchaeologicalresourceswould be lessthan significant with mitigation incorporated directly, indirectly, and cumulatively.
c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
0 5c. Response: ( Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 5- 1 - Archaeological Sensitivity and Figure 5.5-2 — Prehistoric Cultural Resources Sensitivity; Cultural Resources Study; Cultural Resources Assessment Lurin Obsidian Tract Project, February 2020, Appendix D of this IS/MND)
Less Than Significant. An on-site archaeological field survey was conducted in January 2020. No known human remains were present on the proposed Project site and there were no facts or evidence to support the idea that Native Americans or people of European descent are buried on the subject site. Conditions on site remain substantially unchanged. In the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during proposed Project grading, the proper authorities would be notified, and standard procedures for the respectful handling of human remains during earthmoving activities would be followed in accordance with State law.

Consistent with the requirement of California Code of Regulations ( CCR) Section 15064. 5( e), if human remains are encountered, work within 25 feet of the discovery shall be redirected andthe Riverside County Coronernotified immediately StateHealth and Safety CodeSection7050.5 statesthat no further disturbanceshall occur until the County Coroner hasmade a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code ( PRC) Section 5097. 98. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which shall determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the property owner, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associatedwith Native American burials. Consistent with CCR Section 15064. 5( d), if the remains are determined to be Native American and an MLD is notified, the City shall consult with the MLD as identified by the NAHC to develop an agreement for treatment and disposition of the remains Implementation of the Condition of Approval for inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains would ensure enforcement of requirements if human remains are discovered on the site during Project construction activities.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Standard Condition of Approval for Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains:

In the event that human remains (or remains that may be human) are discovered at the Project site during grading or earthmoving, the construction contractors, Project Archaeologist, and/or designated Native American Monitor shall immediately stop all activities within 100 feet of the find. The Project proponent shall then inform the Riverside County Coroner and the City of Riverside Community & Economic Development Department immediately, and the coroner shall be permitted to examine the remains as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(b) unless more current Statelaw requirements arein effect at the time of the discovery. Section 7050.5 requiresthat excavationbe stopped in the vicinity of discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native American. If human remains are determined asthose of Native American origin, the Applicant shall comply with the state relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the jurisdiction of the NAHC ( PRC Section 5097).

The coroner shall contact the NAHC to determine the most likely descendant(s). The MLD shall complete his or her inspection and make recommendations or preferencesfor treatment within 48 hours of being granted accessto the site.

The Disposition of the remains shall be overseenby the most likely descendant(s) to determine the most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associatedgrave artifacts.

The specific locations of Native American burials and reburials will be proprietary and not disclosed to the general public.

The County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission in accordance with California Public Resources Code 5097. 98.

According to California Health and Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery (Section 8100), anddisturbanceof Native American cemeteriesis a felony (Section7052). The disposition of the remainsshall be determined in consultation between the Project proponent and the MLD. In the event that the Project proponent and the MLD are in disagreement regarding the disposition of the remains, State law will apply and the median and decision process will occur with the NAHC ( see Public Resources Code Section 5097. 98( e) and 5097. 94( k)).

Compliance with these provisions and implementation of the standard Condition of Approval would ensure that any potential impacts to unknown buried human remains would be less than significant by ensuring appropriate examination, treatment, and protection of human remains asrequired by Statelaw.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

6. ENERGY
Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
0 6a. Response: (Source: California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 and Part 24, SCAQMD, Project Plan Set; SCE 2017 Power Content Label https:// www.sce.com/sites/default/files/ inline-files/ 2017PCL_ 0.pdf; SCE Energy Data - Reports and Compliance https:// www.sce.com/regulatory/ energy-data--- reports- and- compliances) Less Than Significant Impact. Riverside Public Utilities ( RPU) Electric Service, as shown in Figure 5.16-7 of the City of Riverside 2025 General Plan FEIR, would provide electric service to the Project site. The RPU was established in 1895 and includes 90 miles of transmission lines and 1,200 miles of distribution lines within an 80 -square mile service area. In the 2016/2017 fiscal year for RPU, the average annual electricity usageper residential customer equated to 7,519 kWh.

The proposed Project would include site preparation and development of a Planned Residential Development consisting of 41 single-family residential units, a lot for a park, and lots for water quality managementplan basins. The increasein residential units on the site would generate a minimal increase in energy demand from the RPU. To conserve energy usage, the proposed Project would comply with Building Energy Efficient Standards included in Title 24 of the CCR, which requires new residential development to incorporate energy efficiency standardsinto the proposed Project design. The Project would be required to comply with 2019 Title 24 standardsbecauseits building construction phasewould commenceafter January 1, 2020. The Project would include the following energy conservation standardsduring construction and into its design per the California Green Building Standards Code (Title 24, Part 11 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations):

Mandatory reduction in indoor water use through compliance with specified slow rates for plumbing fixtures and fittings;
Mandatory reduction in outdoor water usethrough compliance with a local water -efficient landscaping ordinance or the California Department of Water Resources' Model;
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance;
65 percent of construction and demolition waste must be diverted from landfills; Mandatory inspections of energy systemsto ensure optimal working efficiency; Inclusion of electric vehicle charging stations within garages of the single-family residential units; Low -pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials, such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring, and particle boards; and
Installation of solar panels on single-family residential units.

During construction, the construction contractor would apply the requirements of the SCAQMD to ensure energy-efficient equipment and vehicles are used for the duration of construction. Implementation of these standards into the design features of the Project and during construction would minimize wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources.

Implementation of the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively on energy resources. No mitigation is required.
b. Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
0 6b. Response: (Source: California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 and Part 24, SCAQMD, Project Plan Set; City of Riverside Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan January 2016) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would be designed to comply with the California Green Building StandardsCode; Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations; California Building Code and Energy Code standards, PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration as applicable to the type of use being developed on site. After January 1, 2020, residential development applications in California would be required to include solar panelsfor on-site renewable energy generation, aspart of the statewide effort in becoming more energy efficient and generating cleaner energy options. The proposed Project would also comply with measuresthat are presented in the Riverside Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan January 2016 by implementing different design elementsthat increase energy efficiency. The measuresand how the Project will comply are presented below:

Measure E- 2: Shade Trees. The applicant of the proposed project has prepared a Landscape Plan for the site, which includes shade trees in various locations where residential units would be located.

Measure SR -3: Utility Programs. The proposedProjectwould be designedto supportthe City' s utility programsto promote energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy.

Measure T-2: Bicycle Parking. The applicant, as shown on the Site Design Plans, would develop bicycle parking areas in the common park areas of the site. Additionally, single-family residential units would be designed with garages where residents could store their bicycles.

Measure T- 6: Density. The density of the proposed Project is compliant with the zoning designations on the site. A Planned Residential Development ( PRD) would be requested for the establishment of detached single-family residential units, private streets, and common open space. A Variance would also be requested by the applicant to allow a reduced perimeter setback.

Measure T- 14: Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Programs. The Project in itself would not offer a neighborhood electric vehicle program but would provide electric vehicle charging stationsfor residentsin their garagesto promote the use of electric vehicles and promote the City of Riverside in establishing neighborhood electric vehicle programs.

Measure W- 1: Water Conservation and Efficiency. The proposed Project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code through implementation of fixture flow rates, standardsfor plumbing fixtures and fittings, and automaticirrigation systemsutilizing weatherand/or soil moisture -basedirrigation controllers.

Based on the Project design features incorporated into the Project, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan related to renewable energy or energy efficiency. Direct, indirect, or cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or deathinvolving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issuedby the StateGeologistfor theareaor basedon other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

X
7i. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PS - 1 — Regional Fault Zones & General Plan 2025 FPEIR Appendix E — Geotechnical Report; Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, Cole Avenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E) Less Than Significant Impact. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing (Appendix E) technical report prepared for the proposed Project contributes to the analysis in this section. The Project site does not lie within an EarthquakeFault Zone" asdefined by the Stateof California in the Alquist- Priolo EarthquakeFault Zoning Act. Themapped fault closestto the Project site is the San Jacinto Fault, approximately 13 miles to the northeast of the Project site. Therefore, the potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath the site is considered low.

CCR Title 24, Part 2, the California Building Code (CBC), establishesminimum standardsfor building design in the State, and it is consistent with or more stringent than Uniform Building Code requirements. Local codes are permitted to be more restrictive than Title 24, but are required to be no less restrictive. The CBC is designed and implemented to improve building safety, sustainability, and consistency, and to integrate new technology and construction methods to construction projects throughout California. The CBC is published every three years and intervening Code Adoption Cycles produce supplement pages 18 months into each three-year period. All proposed amendmentsto California' s building standardsare subject to a lengthy and transparent public participation process throughout each code adoption cycle.

Chapter 16 of the CBC regards General Design Requirements, includes regulations governing seismically resistant construction ( Chapter 16, Division IV) and construction to protect people and property from hazards associated with excavationcave-ins and falling debris or constructionmaterials. Chapter 18 andAppendix Chapter33 regard site demolition, excavations, foundations, retaining walls, and grading, including requirements for seismically resistant design, foundation investigations, stable cut and fill slopes, and drainage and erosion control. The procedures and limitations for the design of structures are based on site characteristics, occupancy type, configuration, structural system height, and seismic zoning.

Construction activities are subject to occupational safety standards for excavation, shoring, and trenching as specified in California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations ( CCR Title 8).

Statelaw requires the designand construction of new structurescomply with current CBC requirements, which addressgeneral geologic, seismic (including ground shaking), and soil constraints for new buildings. Additionally, General Plan Policy PS -

1.1requiresthe City to ensureall new developmentin the City abidesby the most recently adoptedCity and Stateseismicand geotechnical requirements.

Pursuantto Statelaw, and in accordancewith General Plan Policy PS -1.1, the proposedProject would be designedto resist seismic impacts in accordance with current CBC requirements and Title 16 ( Buildings and Construction) of the Riverside Municipal Code (RMC). Prior to issuanceof any entitlements, the City would review and approve plans to confirm that the siting, design, and construction of all single-family residential units ( and associated structures) are in accordancewith the regulations established in the CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standardsappropriate for the seismic zone in which such construction may occur. Additionally, all grading plans would be subject to City review in accordance with RMC, Section 17.16.010. As required by RMC, Section 17/16.010, the recommendations cited in the Project -specific soils and geotechnical reports must be incorporated into the design of the site-specific grading plans, therefore, it is reasonable to conclude the appropriate Project - specific geotechnical recommendations would be reviewed and approved as part of the grading permit. Compliance with CBC regulations and implementation of recommended measures in Sections 8.1 through PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

8.14 of the Project -specific geotechnical study would ensure that Project impacts would be less than significant directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? 0
7ii. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Appendix E — Geotechnical Report. Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM37731, TTM37732, and TTM37733, ColeAvenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019, Appendix E)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in a seismically active areathat has historically been affected by generally moderate to occasionally high levels of ground motion. The site lies within 50 miles of several active faults ( San Jacinto Fault, the closest, approximately 13 miles from the Project site); therefore, during the life of the Project, the property would most likely experience similar moderate to occasionally high ground shaking from these fault zones, as well as some background shaking from other seismically active areasof the Southern California region. The peak ground acceleration is anticipated to be 0.500 g, which equates to potentially severe ground shaking. No known active faults are known to cross through the site.

Design and construction in accordancewith the current CBC requirements is anticipated to adequately addresspotential ground shaking effects on the newly developed 41 single-family residential units on the site. Pursuant to State law and in accordance with General Plan Policy PS -1.1, the 41 single-family residential units of the proposed Project would be designed to resist seismic impacts in accordance with current CBC requirements and Title 16 ( Buildings and Construction) of the RMC. Prior to issuanceof anypermit(s), the City would review andapproveplansto confirm that the siting, designandconstructionof all structures and facilities are in accordancewith the regulations established in the CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standards appropriate for the seismic zone in which such construction may occur. Additionally, grading plans would be subject to City review and approval in accordancewith RMC, Section 17.16.010.

Becausethe proposed Project would comply with CBC regulations that protect habitable structures from seismic hazards and would implement recommended measuresin Sections 8.1 through 8.14 of the Project -specific geotechnical study, direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts associatedwith strong seismic ground shaking would have a less than significant impact. No mitigation measures are required.
iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 7iii. Response: ( Source: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, ColeAvenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E; General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 6- 3 Generalized Liquefaction Zones) Less Than Significant Impact. According to Figure 5.6-3 Generalized Liquefaction Zone of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR, the Project site is not located in an area known for liquefaction. As part of the Project - specific geotechnical report ( Appendix E), two borings were drilled to a maximum depth of approximately 23 feet below ground surface. Groundwater was not found in the two borings that were drilled on the Project site. Colluvium and Val Verde Tonalite Bedrock was encountered on the Project site; both of which are not conducive soil/ geological features for liquefaction to occur. Based on results of the Project - specific geotechnical study, neither liquefaction nor seismic " dry -sand" settlement is a design issue with the proposed Project.

Although the Project site would not be susceptible to liquefaction or settlement, the development would still be designed to meet CBC requirements, as described below.

Pursuantto Statelaw and in accordancewith General Plan Policy PS -1.1, the proposedProject would be designedto resist seismic impacts (including seismic -related ground failure and liquefaction) in accordancewith current CBC requirements and Title 16 (Buildings and Construction) of the RMC. Prior to issuanceof any permit( s), the City would review and approve plans to confirm that the siting, design and construction of all single-family residential units are in accordancewith the regulations established in the CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standards appropriate for the seismic zone in which such construction may occur. Additionally, all grading plans would be subject to City staff review for regulatory compliance in accordancewith RMC, Section 17.16.010. Proper engineering design and construction in conformance with the current CBC standards and Project - specific recommendations in Sections 8. 1 through 8. 14 of the Project - specific geotechnical PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration study would ensurethat seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, would be reduced to lessthan significant levels directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required. iv. Landslides? 0
7iv. Response: ( Source: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, ColeAvenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E; General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5.6-1 Areas Underlain by Steep Slopes) Less Than Significant Impact. The Geology and Soils section of the City' s General Plan 2025 FPEIR identifies " areas of high susceptibility to seismically induced landslides and rock falls correspondto steepslopesin excessof 30 percent." Figure

5.6-1 of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR indicates that the Project site is located on land identified ashaving a 0 to 10 percent slope. The Project - specific geotechnical report determined that landslides are not a design impact consideration at the Project site asthe site is relatively topographically flat and lacks significant on-site or adjacent slopes.

The Project -specific geotechnical report indicates that proposed grading on the Project site would create fill, cut, and fill -over - cut slopesof up to 10 feet in height. In general, permanent graded cut slopes, fill slopes, and fill -over -cut slopesinclined no steeper than a 2: 1 slope with vertical heights of 10 feet or less would possessFactors of Safety of 1.5 or greater and 1.1 or greater under pseudo -static loading. Prior to issuanceof any permit( s), the City would review and approve grading plans to confirm that the siting, design and construction of all single-family residential units are in accordancewith the regulations established in the appropriate CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standard(s). Proper engineering design and construction in conformance with the current CBC standards and Project - specific recommendations, in tandem with the relatively flat topographic relief of the site and surrounding areas, would ensure landslide -related impacts remain directly, indirectly, and cumulatively less than significant. No mitigation is required. b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 7b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 6- 1 — Areas Underlain by Steep Slope, Figure 5.6-4 — Soils, Table 5. 6- B — Soil Types, Title 18 — Subdivision Code, Title 17 — Grading Code, and SWPPP; Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, Cole Avenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E; USDA Web Soil Survey Website https:// websoilsurvey. sc.egov.usda.gov/App/ WebSoilSurvey.aspx ) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is occupied by the following soils: Fallbrook sandyloam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded (FaD2); Fallbrook fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded (FfC2); and, Fallbrook sandy loam, shallow, 15 to 35 percent slopes, eroded (FbF2). Although not encountered during site borings, undocumented fill associatedwith previously constructed buildings on the Project site are expected to be encountered on the southwestern portion of the site.

Undocumented fill is expected to consist of silty sandsourced from locally derived colluvium and bedrock material. Colluvium Qcol) was encounteredacrossthe Project site ranging between 1.5 to 6 feet in depth. Thesedeposits generally consist of silty sandand silt. The materials associatedwith Colluvium are characterized as loose to very denseor soft to very stiff, and dry to moist. Val Verde Tonalite Bedrock ( Kvt) was encountered underlying the Colluvium across the Project site. The granitic bedrock encountered is generally characterized as a weathered, moderately strong material that is medium to coarse grained.

The granitic bedrock was found on the site at a depth between 2 to 7 feet.

Erosion and loss of topsoil could occur as a result of the Project. State and federal requirements call for the preparation and implementation of an SWPPP establishing erosion and sediment controls for construction activities. The Project must also comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. In addition, with the erosion control standards for which all development activity must comply ( Title 18), the Grading Code ( Title 17) also requires the implementation of measures designed to minimize soil erosion. Development of the project site would include incorporation of the recommended design measures of the geotechnical study in Sections 8.1 through 8.14. Compliance with State and federal requirements as well as with Titles 18 and 17 of the CBC would ensure that soil erosion or loss of topsoil impacts would be less than significant directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off- site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X
7c. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PS - 1 — Regional Fault Zones, Figure PS - 2 — Liquefaction Zones, General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure PS - 3 — Soils with High Shrink - Swell Potential, Figure 5. 6- 1— Areas Underlain by SteepSlope, Figure 5.6-4 — Soils, Table 5.6-B — Soil Types, and Appendix E — Geotechnical Report; Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, Cole Avenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province, which forms a broad, northwest -southeast trending mountain belt that extends from Baja California to the Lost Angeles/ San Bernardino basins, and terminates against the TransverseRanges. The Peninsular Rangesare primarily composed of Mesozoic granites and volcanic rocks. The Project site resides on granitic rocks, with a thin cover of colluvial deposits. Compliance with the City' s existing codes and the policies contained in the General Plan 2025 help to ensurethat impacts related to geologic conditions arereduced to less than significant levels directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

Landslides: See response 7( a)( iv).

Lateral Spreading: Adherence to the City' s Grading and Subdivision Codesas well as the California Building Code in the design of this Project would prevent lateral spreading The design featuresto prevent lateral spreadingare retaining walls and the proposedresidential units would be wood -framed structureswith concreteslabson gradeyielding light foundation loads.

Subsidence: The geotechnical study prepared for this Project indicates that the volumetric changesin earth quantities would occur when the site is excavated and on-site soil materials are replaced with compacted fill. It is estimated that the existing earth material would shrink up to approximately 0.3 percent. Based on the properties of the soil, subsidence could occur but, with adherenceto the recommendations found in the geotechnical study, the impact would be reduced to less than significant levels. No mitigation is required.

Liquefaction: See response 7( a)( iii)
Collapse: Adherence to the City' s grading and building requirements would ensurethat the Project site is adequatelyprepared to prevent the collapse of the graded pads and/ or slopes.

Pursuantto Statelaw and in accordancewith GeneralPlan Policy PS -1.1, the proposedProject would be designedto resist impacts related to unstable geologic units or soils in accordance with current CBC requirements and Title 16 ( Buildings and Construction) of the RMC. Prior to issuanceof any entitlements, the City would review and approve plans to confirm that the siting, designand construction of single-family residential units arein accordancewith the regulations establishedin the CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standardsappropriate for the soil types on which such construction may occur. As stated in the Project -specific geotechnical report, additional geotechnical evaluation is required once grading plans, development plans, foundation plans, and structural loads become available. Upon further geotechnical evaluation, additional recommendations may be proposed by the geotechnical engineer, the implementation of which would be required pursuant to 2016 CBC regulations, RMC Title 16 (Buildings and Construction) and Title 17 (Grading), and General Plan Policy PS -1.1.

Additionally, all grading plans would be subject to City staff review for regulatory compliance in accordancewith RMC, Section 17.16.010. Becausethe proposed Project must comply with current CBC regulations that protect habitable structures from unstable geologic units or soils, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts associated with unstable geologic units or soils would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1- B of the Uniform Building Code ( 1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 7d. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 6- 4 — Soils, Figure 5. 6- 4 — Soils, Table 5. 6- B — Soil Types, Figure 5.6-5 — Soils with High Shrink - Swell Potential, Appendix E — Geotechnical Report, and California Building Code as adopted by the City of Riverside and set out in Title 16 of the Riverside Municipal Code; ; Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing, TTM 37731, TTM 37732, and TTM 37733, Cole Avenue, Barton Street, and Obsidian Drive, May 28, 2019 Appendix E) Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils, defined under CBC, expand when wet and shrink when dry. The amount or type of clay presentin soil determines its shrink -swell potential. As evaluatedby the project -specific geotechnical study, on- site soils generally consist of silty sandand silt, and are considered expansive. Thesesoils have an expansion index of 50.

Pursuant to State law and in accordance with General Plan Policy PS -1.1, the proposed Project would be designed to resist impacts related to expansive soils in accordance with current CBC requirements and Title 16 ( Buildings and Construction) of the RMC. Prior to issuanceof any entitlements, the City would review and approve plans to confirm that the siting, design and construction of single-family residential units are in accordancewith the regulations establishedin the CBC, City Building Code, and/or professional engineering standardsappropriate for the soil types on which such construction may occur. As stated in the Project -specific geotechnical report, additional geotechnical evaluation is required once grading plans, development plans, foundation plans, and structural loads become available. Upon further geotechnical evaluation, additional recommendations may be proposed by the geotechnical engineer, the implementation of which would be required pursuant to 2016 CBC regulations, RMC Title 16 (Buildings and Construction) and Title 17 (Grading), and General Plan Policy PS -1.1.

Additionally, all grading plans would be subject to City staff review for regulatory compliance in accordance with RMC, Section 17.16.010. Because the proposed Project must comply with current CBC regulations that protect habitable structures from expansive soils, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts associated with unstable geologic units or soils would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?
X
7e. Response: ( Source: Project Set Plans)
No Impact. The proposed Project would develop an internal wastewaterinfrastructure systemthat would connect directly to existing wastewater infrastructure in adjacentroads. The proposed Project does not include the installation of septic tanks or alternativewastewaterdisposalsystemsin its design, asexisting off- site sewerconnectionsare available. No impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. No mitigation is required. f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
0 7f. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 Policy HP -1.3; Project Plan Set) Less Than Significant Impact. The project - specific geotechnical report that was prepared for the project indicated that the site is underlain by undocumented fill ( afu), Colluvium ( Qcol), overlying Val Verde Tonalite Bedrock ( Kvt) granitic bedrock.

According to the General Plan 2025, asof 2004, the areasouthof Mockingbird Canyon Reservoir, 4.66 miles southeastof the Project site, is the only portion of the City considered as a place of paleontological importance. Accordingly, the Project site is categorized ashaving a low potential to yield paleontological resources.

This category includes sedimentary rock units that: ( 1) are potentially fossiliferous but have not yielded significant fossils in the past; ( 2) have not yet yielded fossils but possess a potential to contain fossil remains; or ( 3) contain common and/ or widespread invertebrate fossils if the taxonomy, phylogeny, and ecology of the species contained in the rock are well understood. Sedimentary rocks expected to contain vertebrate fossils are not placed in this category becausevertebrates are generally rare and found in more localized strata. Rock units designatedas low potential generally do not require monitoring and mitigation during grading and excavation. However, as excavation for construction gets underway, it is possible that new PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and unanticipated paleontological resourcesmight be encountered. If the resource is determined to be significant, monitoring and mitigation are required during grading and excavation from that time on.

Due to the prior grading activities on site and surface disturbance required to develop the previous single-family residential unit, the likelihood of encountering subsurfacepaleontological resourcesduring excavation for the proposed Project is low. In accordancewith Statelaw, the proposed Project would be required to comply with Section 5097.5 of the California PRC and California Administrative Code, Title 14, Section 4307, which statethat no person shall remove, injure, deface or destroy any object of paleontological, archaeological, or historical interest or value. Penal Code Section 622. 5 establishes as a misdemeanor the willful injury, disfiguration, defacement, or destruction of any object or thing of paleontological interest or value, whether situated on private or public lands. Finally, Section 17.28.010(H)( 3) of the RMC enables the City to require the project applicant to make reasonable effort to preserve or mitigate impacts to any affected significant or unique paleontological resource. Pursuant to Section 17.28.010(H)( 3) of the RMC, the City' s Community & Economic Development Department may inspect construction activities on site for compliance with project conditions of approval, including protection of paleontological resources.

Sincethe proposedProject footprint is within apreviously cleared site at onetime usedfor agricultural activities and developed with a single-family residential unit, there is no indication that paleontological resources occur therein. The proposed Project would be required to comply with all applicable regulations protecting paleontological resourcesand would be conditioned to cease excavation or construction activities if paleontological resources are identified during execution of the Project.

Therefore, impacts related to previously undiscovered paleontological resources would be less than significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
8a. Response: (Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Obsidian Development, November 2020 (Appendix B); SCAQMD Greenhouse GasesCEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting No. 15. September 28, 2010, City of Riverside Restorative Growthprint — Climate Action Plan RRG, 2015) Less Than Significant Impact. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064( b) provides that the " determination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part of the public agency involved, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data," and further states that an " ironclad definition of significant effect is not always possible becausethe significance of an activity may vary with the setting." Currently, there is no statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions threshold used to determine potential GHG emissions impacts of a project. The SCAQMD uses the following tiered approach for evaluating GHG emissions for development projects where the SCAQMD is not the lead agency.

Tier 1 Determine if CEQA categorical exemptions are applicable. If not, move to Tier 2.

Tier 2 Consider whether or not the proposed project is consistent with a locally adopted GHG reduction plan that has gone through public hearing and CEQA review, that has an approved inventory, includes monitoring, etc. If not, move to Tier 3.

Tier 3 Consider whether the proposed project generates GHG emissions in excess of screening thresholds for individual land uses. A 10, 000 - metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent per year ( metric ton [ MT] CO2e/ year) threshold for industrial useswould be recommendedfor use by all lead agencies. Under Option 1, separatescreeningthresholds are proposed for residential projects ( 3, 500 MT CO2e/ year), commercial projects ( 1,400 MT CO2e/ year), and mixed- use projects ( 3,000 MT CO2e/year). Under Option 2, a single numerical screening threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year would be used for all non -industrial projects. If the project generatesemissions in excessof the applicable screening threshold, move to Tier 4.

Tier 4 Establishes a decision tree approach that includes compliance options for projects that have incorporated design features into the project and/ or implement GHG mitigation measures.

Efficiency Target ( 2020 Targets).
o 4.8 MT CO2eper servicepopulation ( the number of jobs and the number of residentsprovided by a project) for project -level threshold (land use emissionsonly).
o 6. 6 MT CO2e per service population for plan - level thresholds ( all sectors).

Efficiency Target (2035 Targets).
o 3. 0 MT CO2e per service population for project - level threshold. o 4. 1 MT CO2e per service population for plan - level threshold.

If a project fails to meet any of these emissions reduction targets and efficiency targets, the project would move to Tier 5.

Tier 5 Consider the implementation of CEQA mitigation ( including the purchase of GHG offsets) to reduce the project efficiency target to Tier 4 levels.

In 2014, the City of Riverside was one of 12 cities that collaborated with the Western Riverside Council of Governments on a Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP) that includes 36 measuresto guide the City' s GHG reduction efforts through 2020.

Through the Western Riverside Council of Governments Subregional Climate Action Plan process, the City has a Climate PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Action Plan that identifies emissionstarget of 2,224,908 MT CO2e, which is 26.4 percentbelow the City' s 2007 baseline and 15percentbelow 2010 emissions. To further develop local GHG reduction measuresfor the Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and CAP, the City conducted a detailed assessmentof local strategies and actions related to the measures identified in the Subregional CAP and expanded the discussion and analysis with respect to implementation particularly post -2020), costs and funding, performance metrics, and local co -benefits. Importantly, the discussionsidentify local economic and entrepreneurship opportunities that can be integrated with local, regional, and global greenhouse gas reductions (e.g., the development of green enterprise zones). The Project is consistent with the Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and CAP and Assembly Bill ( AB) 32. Nonetheless, for informational purposes, the Project' s construction- and operational - related GHG emissions have been identified below. The Tier 3, Option 1 approach for residential projects ( 3, 000 metric tons of CO2e) is utilized in order to determine the significance for the proposed Project' s GHG emissions. Overall, the following activities associatedwith the proposedProject could directly or indirectly contribute to the generation of GHG emissions.

Construction Activities: During construction of the Project, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, eachof which typically usesfossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -fuel based fuels creates GHGs ( e.g., carbon dioxide ( CO2), methane [CH4] and nitrous oxide [ N2O]). Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment.

Gas, Electricity, and Water Use: Natural gasuse results in the emission of two GHGs: CH4 (the major component of natural gas) and CO2 (from combustion of natural gas). Electricity use can result in GHG production if the electricity is generatedby combusting fossil fuel. California' s water conveyancesystemis energy -intensive. Preliminary estimatesindicate that the total energy used to pump and treat this water exceeds6.5 percent of the total electricity used in the Stateper year. Title 24 standards have been documented to reduce energy usage (e.g., for lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation, and water heating) and associated GHG emissions.

Solid Waste Disposal: Solid waste generated by the Project could contribute to GHG emissions in a variety of ways.

Landfilling and other methods of disposal use energy for transporting and managing the waste, and they produce additional GHGs to varying degrees. Landfilling, the most common waste management practice, results in the release of CH4 from the anaerobic decomposition of organic materials. CH4 is 25 times more potent a GHG than CO2. However, landfill CH4 can also be a sourceof energy. In addition, many materials in landfills do not decomposefully and the carbon that remains is sequestered in the landfill and not released into the atmosphere.

Motor Vehicle Use: Transportation associated with the proposed Project would result in GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels in daily automobile and truck trips.

Short -Term ( Construction) Emissions. The Project construction emissions were calculated using Ca1EEMod, which calculatesemissionsfrom off- road equipment usageandon -road vehicle travel associatedwith haul, delivery, and construction worker trips. GHG emissionsduring construction were forecastbasedon the proposed construction scheduleand applying the mobile sourcederived from the SCAQMD- recommended Ca1EEMod. The calculations of the emissions generatedduring the Project construction activities reflects the types and quantities of construction equipment that would be used to grade and excavatethe Project site, constructthe residential units andrelated improvements, andplant new landscapingwithin the Project site. Table H: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions lists the CO2 emissions for each of the planned construction phases.

The emissions detailed in Table H would be generated from the proposed Project constructed in compliance with the latest California Department of ResourcesRecycling and Recovery Sustainable (Green) Building Program regulations. Specifically, at least 50 percent of all construction materials (including, but not limited to, soil, mulch, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard) shall be recycled/reused and " green building materials" ( e.g., those materials that are rapidly renewable or resource -efficient, andrecycled andmanufacturedin an environmentally friendly way) shall be usedfor at least 10percentof the Project.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Table H: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Construction Phase
Peak Annual Emissions ( MT/ yr) Total Emissions per
Calendar Year ( MT/ CO2e) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Demolition 35. 75 0. 01 0 35. 99
549. 33
Site Preparation 17. 61 0. 01 0 17. 74
Grading 84. 69 0. 03 0 85. 36
Building Construction 383. 68 0. 08 0 385. 82
Paving 21. 43 0. 01 0 21. 60
Architectural Coatings 2. 83 0. 01 0 2. 83
Total Construction Emissions Amortized over 30 years 18. 31 Source: LSA, Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Technical Report Table M, pg. 47, February 2020.

CH4 = methane MT/ CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent CO2 = carbon dioxide MT = metric tons
CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent N20 = nitrous oxide
Long -Term ( Operational) Emissions. Long- term operation of the proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from area and mobile sources and indirect emissions from stationary sources associatedwith energy consumption. Mobile -source emissions of greenhouse gases would include Project - generated vehicle trips associated with on- site uses. Area - source emissions would be associatedwith activities ( e.g., landscaping and maintenance of proposed land uses, natural gasfor heating, and other sources). Increasesin stationary -sourceemissionswould also occur at off- site utility providers asaresult of demand for electricity, natural gas, and water by the proposed Project. Construction emissions were amortized over a 30 -year period and added to the annual operational phase GHG emissions. The GHG emission estimates presented in Table I: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions detail the emissions associatedwith the level of development envisioned by the proposed Project.

Table I: Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source
Pollutant Emissions ( MT/ yr)
Bio - 0O2 NBio- 0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Construction Emissions Amortized over 30 Years 0 18. 14 18. 14 0. 01 0 18. 25 Operational Emissions
Area 0 0. 69 0. 69 0. 01 0 0. 71
Energy 0 172. 24 172. 24 0. 01 0. 01 172. 85
Mobile 0 543. 24 543. 24 0. 03 0 543. 88
Waste 9. 74 0 9. 74 0. 58 0 24. 12
Water 0. 68 18. 29 18. 97 0. 07 0. 01 21. 25
Total Project Emissions 10. 42 752. 60 763. 01 0. 67 0 781. 06 SCAQMD Tier 3 Threshold 3, 000
Significant? No
Source: LSA, Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Technical Report Table N, pg. 48, February 2020.

Bio -0O2 = biologically generatedCO2 CH4 = methane
CO2 = carbon dioxide CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent
MT/ yr = metric tons per year N20 = nitrous oxide
NBio- 0O2 = non -biologically generatedCO2 SCAQMD = SouthCoastAir Quality ManagementDistrict The remaining CO2e emissions are primarily associated with building heating systems and increased regional power plant electricity generation due to the proposed Project' s electrical demands. At present, there is a federal ban on chlorofluorocarbons; therefore, it is assumed the Project would not generate emissions of chlorofluorocarbons. The Project may emit a small amount of hydrofluorocarbons from leakageand service of refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment and from disposal at the end of the life of the equipment. However, the details regarding refrigerants to be used at the Project site are unknown at this time. Perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride are typically used in industrial applications, which would PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration not occur on the Project site. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to contribute significant emissions of these additional GHGs.

Because climate change impacts are cumulative in nature, no typical single project can result in emission of such a magnitude that it, in and of itself, would be significant on a project basis. The Project' s GHG emissions of 781. 06 MT CO2e are less than the SCAQMD- recommended interim Option 1 threshold of 3, 000 MT CO2e for all land use types.

The emissions detailed in Table I would be generated from the proposed Project operated in compliance with the latest California Building Code's Title 24 energystandards. Specifically, the Project designwould incorporate increasedinsulation suchthat heattransfer and thermal bridging is minimized, aswell asENERGY STAR® or better rated windows, spaceheating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, appliances, or other applicable electrical equipment. All on-site lighting would be energy efficient, and daylight would be utilized as an integral component of residential development lighting systems. On-site landscapingwould be drought tolerant and incorporate water -efficient irrigation systemsand devicessuch as soil moisture - based irrigation controls. Additionally, buildings would be designed to be water efficient and incorporate water -efficient fixtures and appliances, including low -flow faucets and toilets. Furthermore, Project design would restrict watering methods to prohibit systemsthat apply water to non -vegetated surfacesand to control runoff. To facilitate and encouragerecycling to reduce landfill -associated emissions, among others, residents would have bins for both recycling and solid waste generation.

Furthermore, this analysis considers GHG emission significance by determining the Project' s consistency with the policies and goals in the Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan, Assembly Bill 32, and Executive Order S- 3- 05. As discussed in Checklist Response 8b, below, the Project would be consistent with the strategiesand goals from the Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan and would not conflict with Assembly Bill 32, which establishesa goal of reducing GHG emissionsto 1990 levels by the year 2020, or Executive Order S-3-05, which establishesa goal of reducing GHG emissions 80 percentbelow 1990levels by 2050.

In order to ensure that the proposed Project complies with and would not conflict with or impede the implementation of reduction goals identified by the City or State, the proposed Project would comply with the latest California Building Code' s Title 24 energy standardsregarding the energy efficiency of buildings, appliances, and lighting, which would reduce the Project' s electricity demand by enhancing the design and construction of proposed buildings through the use of building conceptshaving a positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainableconstruction practices.

As detailed in detailed in Tables H and I, the Project' s greenhouse gas emissions ( 781. 06 metric tons of CO2e) would not exceed the SCAQMD- recommended Tier 3, Option 1 threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e. Accordingly, the proposed Project would not conflict with or impede implementation of the reduction goals identified in AB 32, EO S-3-05, and other strategiesto help reduce GHGs to the level proposed by the Governor. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generateGHG emissions, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively that would have a significant impact on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
8b. Response: ( Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Obsidian Development, November 2020 (Appendix B))
Less Than Significant Impact. In 2014, the City was one of 12 that collaborated with the Western Riverside Council of Governmentsona SubregionalClimate Action Planthatincludes36 measuresto guidethe City' sgreenhousegasreduction efforts through 2020. Through the Western Riverside Council of Governments Subregional Climate Action Plan process, the City has committedto a2020emissionstargetof 2,224,908MT CO2e, which is 26.4 percentbelow theCity' s2007baselineand 15percent below 2010 emissions. This representsa reduction of 779,304 MT CO2efrom the City' s 2020 business -as -usual forecast. The City is aiming for a 2035emissionstargetof 1,542,274 MT CO2e, which is 49 percentbelow the 2007baselineandrepresentsa reduction of 2,120,931 MT CO2e from the 2035 business -as -usual forecast. The City adopted its Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan in January 2016.

The Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan expandsupon the efforts of PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration the Western Riverside Council of Governments Subregional Climate Action Plan, employing local measuresto help the City achieve deep greenhousegas reductions through the year 2035. To further develop local GHG reduction measuresfor the Riverside Restorative Growthprint Economic Prosperity Action Plan and Climate Action Plan, the City conducted a detailed assessment of local strategies and actions related to the measures identified in the Subregional CAP and expanded the discussion and analysis with respect to implementation (particularly post -2020), costs and funding, performance metrics, and local co - benefits. Importantly, the discussionsidentify local economic andentrepreneurshipopportunities that canbe integrated with local, regional, and global greenhousegasreductions (e.g., the developmentof greenenterprisezones).

Table J: Riverside Restorative Growthprint Action Plan Emission Reduction Strategies Consistency lists the applicable strategies and goals from the Riverside Growthprint Climate Action Plan and identifies how the proposed Project achieves compliance.

Table J: Riverside Restorative Growthprint Climate Action Plan Emission Reduction Strategies Consistency Measure/ Regulation
State and Regional Regulations
Energy
Project Consistency
California Building Energy Efficiency Standards ( Title 24, Part 6).

Maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards, and pursue additional efficiency efforts including new technologies, and new policy and implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California ( including both investor-owned and publicly owned utilities).

Consistent. The proposed Project will comply with the
requirements of the 2019 California Building Energy
Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) including measuresto incorporate energy-efficient building designfeatures.

Water
Water Use Efficiency. Reduce per capita water use by 20% by 2020.

Senate Bill ( SB) X7- 7 is part of a California legislative package passed in 2009 that requires urban retail water suppliers to reduce per - capita water use by 10% from a baseline level by 2015, and to reduce per capita water use by 20% by 2020. Green accountability performance GAP) Goal 16 directly aligns with SB X7- 7. In Southern California, energy costs and GHG emissions associated with the transport, treatment, and delivery of water from outlying regions are high.

Therefore, the region has extra incentive to reduce water consumption.

While this is considered a state measure, it is up to the local water retailers, jurisdictions, and water users to meet these targets.

Consistent. The proposed Project would comply with the
requirements of Title 19 — Article VIII — Chapter 19. 570 — Water Efficient Landscaping and Irrigation, including
measures to increase water use efficiency. Water -efficient irrigation systems and devices and drought - tolerant
landscaping would be installed on the Project site.

Solid Waste
Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion. Meet mandatory requirement to divert 50% of C& D waste from landfills by 2020 and exceedrequirement by diverting 90% of C& D waste from landfills by 2035.

Consistent. In compliance with CalGreen requirements, at least 65 percent of all nonhazardous construction waste generated by the proposed Project would be recycled and/or salvaged ( including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). Furthermore, 100 percent of excavated soil shall be reused or recycled.

Transportation
Pavley and Low Carbon Fuel Standard ( LCFS). ARB identified this measure as a Discrete Early Action Measure. This measure would reduce the carbon intensity of California' s transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by 2020.

Consistent. The Project does not involve the manufacture, sale, or purchase of vehicles. However, construction vehicles that operate within and accessthe Project site will comply with Pavley and Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFs).

Riverside Restorative Growthprint Climate Action Plan Measures Energy Mea sures
E- 1: Traffic and Streetlights. Replace traffic and streetlights with high -efficiency bulbs.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers. Nonetheless, the Project would comply with applicable energy efficiency
requirements related to lighting detailed in the Green
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Building Standards Code ( Title 24, California Code of
Regulations).

E-2: Shade Trees Strategically. Plant trees at new residential developments to reduce the urban heat island effect.

Consistent. The Project would include trees and vegetation throughout the Project site in various locations.

E-3: Local Utility Programs. Electricity Financing and incentives for businessandhome ownersto makeenergyefficient, renewableenergy, and water conservation improvements.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers. Nonetheless, the Project would comply with applicable energy efficiency requirements detailed in the CalGreen ( Title 24, CCR).

E-4: Renewable Energy Production on Public Property. Large scale renewableenergyinstallation onpublicly owned property andin public rights of way.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

E- 5: UCR Carbon Neutrality. Collaborate with UCR to achieve a carbon neutral campus.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

E- 6: RPU Technology Grants. RPU grant programs to foster research, development and demonstration of innovative solutions to energy problems.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

Transportation Measures
T- 1: Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements. Expand on - street and off- street bicycle infrastructure, including bicycle lanes and bicycle trails.

Consistent. The Project would comply with RMC Chapter

10.64.240. Bicycle accessibility would be possible through shared bike lanes in roads on Lurin Avenue, Wood Road, and Taft Street. The City allows bicycles to travel on roads via shared lanes, in areas without designated bicycle lanes.

T- 2: Bicycle Parking. Provide additional options for bicycle parking. Consistent. The Project would comply with RMC Chapter

10. 64. Neighborhood parks will provide bicycle posts, or in some cases, a bicycle corral, to afford the least obstruction to pedestrian traffic.

T- 3: End of Trip Facilities. Encourage use of non -motorized transportation modesby providing appropriatefacilities and amenities for commuters.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at large employment centers or commercial land uses.

T- 4: Promotional Transportation Demand Management.

Encourage Transportation Demand Management strategies.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at large employment centers with 100 or more employees. This Project would not staff any on- site employees.

T- 5: Traffic Signal Coordination. Incorporate technology to synchronizeand coordinatetraffic signalsalong local arterials.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

T- 6: Density. Improve jobs -housing balance and reducevehicle miles traveled by increasing household and employment densities.

Consistent. The Project would provide a residential density of

4.08 dwelling units per acre and would increasethe supply of housing units in Riverside by 41 dwelling units, adding approximately 117 residents to the City population. By
providing housingunits within 5 miles of downtown Riverside, the Project would improve the jobs—housing balance and help reduce vehicle miles traveled by local residents.

T- 7: Mixed -Use Development. Provide for a variety of development types and uses.

Not Applicable. The Project is a single-family residential development.

T- 8: Pedestrian -Only Areas. Encourage walking by providing pedestrian - only community areas.

Consistent. The neighborhood provides a pedestrian network along streets. Sidewalks are required on all arterial and collector streets. Inclusion of plans for pedestrian access and circulation for this Project would be submitted for review and approval as a condition of the City' s Design Review Process.

The Project would also be required to comply with RMC
Chapter 19.580.080G regarding pedestrian access and
circulation.

T-9: Limit Parking Requirements for New Development. Reduce requirementsfor vehicle parking in new developmentprojects.

Not Applicable. The proposed Project would meet the minimum parkingspacesfor residences.

PR - 2020- 000733 (TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration T- 10: High Frequency Transit Service. Implement bus rapid transit service in the subregion to provide alternative transportation options.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government agencies, not private developers. However, the proposed Project would be locateda half -mile from the Wood Streetbus stop, which would encourage employees and residents to use transit.

T- 11: Voluntary Transportation Demand Management. Encourage employers to create TDM programs for their employees
Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at large employment centers with 100 or more employees. The Project would not have employees and would not be considered a large
employment center.

T- 12: Accelerated Bike Plan. Accelerate the implementation of all or specified components of a jurisdiction' s adopted bike plan.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers. However, the proposed Project would not obstruct the implementation of the adopted bike plan.

T- 13: Fixed Guideway Transit. By 2020, complete feasibility study and by 2025 introduce a fixed route transit service in the jurisdiction.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

T- 14: Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Programs. Implement development requirements to accommodate Neighborhood Electric Vehicles and supporting infrastructure.

Consistent. The Project would provide electrical infrastructure for electric vehicle charging station in compliance with the 2019 GreenBuilding Energy Efficiency Standard.

T- 15: Subsidized Transit. Increaseaccessto transit by providing free or reduced passes
Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at large employment centers with 100 or more employees and is not applicable to the Project.

T- 16: Bike Share Program. Create nodesoffering bike sharing atkey locations throughout the City.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

T- 17: Car Share Program. Offer Riverside residents the opportunity to use car sharing to satisfy short- term mobility needs.

Not Applicable. This policy is aimed at businessesin the City of Riverside and not residential developments.

T- 18: SB 743 - Alternative to level of service. Use SB 743 to incentivize development in the downtown and other areas served by transit.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers. Furthermore, the Project is not locatedin a transit priority area.

T- 19: Alternative Fuel & Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure.

Promote the use of alternative fueled vehicles such as those powered by electric, natural gas, biodiesel, and fuel cells by Riverside residents and workers.

Consistent. The proposed Project would be required to be consistent with applicable EV charging station requirements detailed in CALGreen ( Title 24, CCR). As such, the Project would be equipped with the EV changing infrastructure to support charging stationswithin eachdwelling unit.

T- 20: Eco- Corridor/ Green Enterprise Zone. Create a
geographically defined area(s) featuring best practices in sustainable urban design and greenbuilding focused on supporting both clean -tech and green businesses.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

Water Measure
W- 1: Water Conservation and Efficiency. Reduce per capita water useby 20 percent by 2020.

Consistent. The proposed Project would be required to be consistent with applicable water efficiency requirements detailed in the Green Building Standards Code ( Title 24, California Code of Regulations). As such, the Project would be equipped with low -flow plumbing fixtures that reduce water use.

Solid Waste Measures
SW - 1: Yard Waste Collection. Provide green waste collection bins community - wide.

Consistent. The Project would comply with applicable solid waste requirements.

SW -2: Food Scrap and Compostable Paper Diversion. Divert food and paper waste from landfills by implementing commercial and residential collection program.

Consistent. The Project would be required to participate in applicable waste diversion programs. The Project would also be subject to all applicable State and City requirements for solid waste reduction.

Food, Agriculture, and Urban Forest Measures
A- 1: Local Food and Agriculture. Promote local food and agricultural programs.

Not Applicable. This objective is aimed at government
agencies, not private developers.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration A- 2: Urban Forest. Augment City' s Urban and Community Forest Consistent. The Project would be required to comply with the Program to include an Urban Forest Management Plan. Orangecrest Specific Plan Landscape Requirements, the City Landscape Design Guidelines, and Chapter 13. 06 of the RMC.

Source: LSA, Air Quality and Greenhouse GasAnalysis Technical Report, Table 0, pgs. 51 to 54, February 2020.

The SCAQMD supports State, federal, and international policies to reducelevels of ozone depleting gasesthrough its Global Warming Policy and rules and has establishedan interim GHG threshold. The Project would comply with the City' s General Plan policies and CBC provisions designed to reduce GHG emissions. In addition, the Project would comply with all SCAQMD applicable rules and regulations during construction and, as demonstrated in the Climate Change Analysis, would not interfere with the State's goals of reducing GHG emission to 1990 levels by the year 2020 as stated in AB 32 and an 80 percent reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2050 as statedin Executive Order S-3-05. Based upon the modeling for this Project and the discussion above, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation related to the reduction in the emissions of GHG and thus a less than significant impact would occur directly, indirectly, and cumulatively in this regard.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
0 9a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Public Safety Element, GP 2025 FPEIR, California Health and Safety Code, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, California Building Code, Riverside Fire Department EOP, 2002 and Riverside Operational Area — Multi - Jurisdictional LHMP, 2004 Part 1, OEM' s Strategic Plan) Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the Project has the potential to create a hazard to the public or environment through the routine transportation, use, and disposal of construction - related hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, solvents, and other materials. These materials are typical materials delivered to construction sites. However, due to the limited quantities of thesematerials to be used by the proposedProject, they are not consideredhazardousto the public at large. In accordance with the City' s Hazardous Materials Policy, the transport, use, and storage of hazardous materials during the construction and operation of the site would be conducted pursuant to all applicable local, State, and federal laws, and in cooperation with the County' s Department of Environmental Health. Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations ( CFR) implemented by Title 13 of the CCR describes strict regulations for the safe transportation of hazardous materials. Compliance with all applicable local, State, and federal laws related to the transportation, use, and storage of hazardous materials would reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit, use, and storage.

Once operational, the 41 single-family residential units on the Project site may store small quantities of hazardousmaterials on their private properties. However, due to the limited quantities of these materials to be used once the Project is operational, they are not consideredhazardousto the public at large.

Compliance with all applicable local, State, and federal laws, including but not limited to Title 49 of the CFR implemented by Title 13 of the CCR, would ensure a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, and cumulatively from the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. No mitigation is required. b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the releaseof hazardousmaterials into the environment?
101
9b. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 Public Safety Element, GP 2025 FPEIR Tables 5.7A — D, Cahfornia Health and Safety Code, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, California Building Code, City of Riverside' s EOP, 2002 and Riverside Operational Area — Multi - Jurisdictional LHMP, 2004 Part 1, OEM' s Strategic Plan) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site is vacant, except for a concrete foundation of a single- family residential building that was demolished between 2013 and 2014. Between 1948 and 1966, the Project site was utilized for agricultural use and between 2002 and 2005, the portions of the site being utilized for agriculture were demolished/ removed. As the Project site hasbeenhistorically used for agriculture, the probability of on-site soil containing pesticides and heavy metals cannot be precluded. If such hazardousmaterials are within the on-site soil, construction activities would have the potential to releasepesticides and heavy metals in the air, potentially affecting adjacentand nearby sensitivereceptors (i.e., the single-family residential unit neighborhood to the north, south, southwest, and southeast). In order to ensure that agricultural use -related hazardous materials are not present in the on- site soil, Mitigation Measures HAZ- 1 and HAZ- 2 would be implemented to reduce impacts.

The concreteslab that would be removed from the Project site during construction hasthe potential to releasecrystalline silica dust as concrete typically contains quartz which has crystalline silica. During construction, as a standard condition, the construction contractor would require construction workers demolishing the concrete slab to use respirators and for dust suppression (adding water to the area) to be implemented. As no structures are located on site, asbestos -containing material and lead- based paint would not be encountered on the Project site.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Online researchof government environmental regulatory databaseswhere available, aswell asa general cursory internet search of the Project site, for information indicative of a Recognized Environmental Condition ( REC). The results indicated no REC was identified on the site pursuant to all of the databasesthat were researched. A summary of the findings of the regulatory databasereview with regard to sites identified as located within the American Society for Testing Materials specified search distance surrounding the Project site is provided below:

CORTESE List — None.

Federal National Priority List ( NPL): No NPL listings were identified within a one -mile radius of the Project site.

Federal Delisted NPL: No DNPL listings were identified within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the Project site.

Federal Superfund Enterprise Management System ( SEMS) ( formerly Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System ( CERCLIS)): No SEMS listings were identified within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the Project site.

Federal SEMS - ARCHIVE ( former CERC- NFRAP): No SEMS - ARCHIVE listings were identified within a 0. 5 - mile radius of the Project site.

Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Sites ( Resource Conservation and Recovery Act- CORRACTS): No CORRACTS listings were identified within a one -mile radius of the Project site.

Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act- TSDF: No TSD listings were identified within a 0.5 -mile radius of the Project site.

State/ Tribal Hazardous Waste Sites: No SHWS listings were identified within a one -mile radius of the Project site on the EnviroStor database.

State/ Tribal Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites: No SWF/ LF listings were identified within a 0. 5- mile radius of the Project site.

State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: No LUST listings were identified within a 0.5 -mile radius of the Project site.

No SLIC listings were identified within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the Project site.

State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites: No VCP listing was identified within a 0.5 -mile radius of the Project site.

State/ Tribal Brownfields: No brownfields listings were identified within a 0. 5 -mile radius of the Project site.

The EnviroStor Website was also researched to determine if the Project site or adjacent areas ( within a 1 -mile radius of the Project site) contain hazardous materials sites. The EnviroStor Website indicated two sites, Elementary School No. 32 Krameria Avenue/ Cole Avenue) and Proposed Citrus Heritage Middle School ( southwest and southeast corner of Krameria Avenue and Chicago Avenue), where school clean-up sites were investigated. However, these sites are now inactive and the cleanup status was withdrawn as of July 14, 2004, for Elementary School No. 32 and no further action was required as of October 16, 2007, for ProposedCitrus Heritage Middle School. The Project site doesnot show up on any of the governmental regulatory databaselists.

The Project may involve the useof hazardousmaterials but would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste. These regulations include, but are not limited to, Title 49 of the CFR implemented by Title 13 of the CCR for the safe transportation of hazardous materials, SCAQMD Rule 1403 for Asbestos -Containing Material, Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 29, Section 1926.62 and Title 8, and CCR Section 1532. 1 for LBP. As condition of Project approval, the above - recommended actions would be implemented as part of the Project to reduce potential hazardous material releases. Compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws related to the transportation, use, and storage of hazardous materials, as well as implementation of mitigation measureMitigation Measures HAZ- 1 and HAZ- 2, would reducethe likelihood andseverity of accidentsthrough reasonablyforeseeableupset and accident conditions involving the releaseof hazardousmaterials into the environment.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Measures
HAZ- 1: Prior to issuanceof a grading permit, a soil survey conducted by a licensed professional (retained by the applicant and approved by the City) to determine levels of pesticides and or heavy metals shall be conducted on the site. If pesticide or heavy metal levels are not found on the Project site (or are found below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) threshold limits for human exposure), then no additional mitigation is required. However, if pesticide or heavy metal levels exceeding the EPA threshold limits for human exposure are found on site, then Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 would be required.

HAZ- 2: If the soil survey determines that pesticide or heavy metal levels are found on the Project site that exceedthe EPA threshold limits for human exposure, a report of the findings and a Removal Action Plan ( RAW) shall be prepared by a qualified licensed professional ( retained by the applicant and approved by the City) and submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC) or other appropriate agency for review and approval. The report shall outline the proceduresfor removing contaminatedsoils from the Project sitedown to the level of contamination and for off- site disposal by a licensed contractor at a facility that accepts such contaminated soil. Soil shall not be reusedon the Project site andnew soil shall be imported from off site andusedon the site during Project construction.

This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the DTSC and the City of Riverside Community Development Director or designee, and/or Building and Safety Division or designee.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ- 1 and HAZ- 2 would reduce direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
X
9c. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Public Safety and Education Elements, GP 2025 FPEIR Table 5.7-D - CaIARP RMP Facilities in the Project Area, Figure 5. 13- 2 — Riverside Unified School District Boundaries, Table

5. 13- D Riverside Unified School District Schools, Figure 5. 13- 3 Alvord Unified School District Boundaries, Table

5. 13- E Alvord Unified School District Schools, Figure 5. 13- 4 — Other School District Boundaries, California Health and Safety Code, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, California Building Code) Less Than Significant Impact. Martin Luther King High School is located at 9301 Wood Road, approximately 0.38 mile north of the Project site. This is the nearest school to the proposed Project; as such, schools are not within one- quarter mile of the Project site.

Although hazardous materials and/or waste generatedfrom the proposed Project (including demolition materials with lead basedpaint and asbestoscontaining materials) may pose a health risk to nearby existing or proposed schools, the construction contractor and any other retained construction companiesretained for the project that handle hazardousmaterials arerequired to comply with the provisions of the City' s Fire Code and any additional regulations as required in the California Health and Safety Code Article 1 Chapter 6.95 for the BusinessEmergency Plan. Onceoperational, the residential units within the Project site would more than likely store minimal amounts of hazardous materials ( i.e., bleaches, oil, fuel, etc.). Residents would be required to comply with the City' s Fire Code and, if a hazardouswaste release occurs, would contact the fire department to secure such releases. If a hazardous release occurs, the amount of release is expected to be nominal and would not affect Martin Luther King High School. Compliance with existing federal and State regulations impacts associated with the exposure of schoolsto hazardousmaterials causedby this Project would result in a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required.
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962. 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X
9d. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PS - 5 — Hazardous Waste Sites, GP 2025 FPEIR Tables 5. 7-A — CERCLIS Facility Information, Figure 5. 7-B — Regulated Facilities in TRI Information and 5. 7- C; Department PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Database Listed Sites https:// www.envirostor. dtsc.ca.gov/public/ map/ myaddress= Riverside)
No Impact. A search of the Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor database ( on June 26, 2020) and the California Environmental Protection Agency " CorteseList" compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 indicated there are no sitesof concernregarding hazardousmaterials on the Project site or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site. In addition, the General Plan 2025 FPEIR (Figure 5.7-1) doesnot list any hazardouswaste sites on or adjacent to the Project site. Therefore, the Project would have no impact relatedto creatingany significant hazardto the public or environment dueto being located on a recognized hazardousmaterials site, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
X
9e. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PS -6 — Airport Safety Zones and Influence Areas, RCAL UCP and March Air Reserve Base/ March Inland Port Comprehensive Land Use Plan ( 1999), Air Installation Compatible UseZone Studyfor March Air ReserveBase (August 2005)
No Impact. The nearestairport to the Project site is the March Air ReserveBase, located approximately 3.98 miles eastof the site. Riverside Municipal Airport is located approximately 7.6 miles northwest of the Project site. The proposed Project is located within Zone E Other Airport Environs of the March Air Reserve Base Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (MARB ALUC). Zone E doesnot place any restrictions on the developmentof residential units. The proposedProject is also located outside of the 55 dBA CNEL noise contour of the MARB as described in the MARB ALUC. The Project site is not located within any airport land useplan areaor compatibility zone. As such, implementation of the proposedProject would not result in on-site residents or employees on site being affected by a safety hazard or excessive noise from an airport. No impact would occur directly, indirectly, or cumulatively with implementation of the. No mitigation is required. f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
9f. Response: (Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Chapter 7.5.7 — Hazards and Hazardous Materials, City of Riverside' s EOP, 2002 and Riverside Operational Area — Multi - Jurisdictional LHMP, 2004 Part 1, and OEM' s Strategic Plan) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would be constructed and operated in accordance with the City' s Emergency Operations Plan to ensure a coordinated and effective planned responseby the City Police and Fire Depaitiuents to extraordinary emergency situations and disasters. The proposed Project will comply with the 2019 California Fire Code Section 503 - Fire Apparatus Access Roads. Sections 503. 1. 1 Buildings and Facilities; 503. 2. 1 Dimensions of the 2019 California Fire Code Section will all be followed in development of the proposed Project.

The majority of the Project site is currently vacantexceptfor a large standingmetalbuilding in the northeasternportion of the site. Remnants of a building foundation are also located near the northern boundary of the proposed Project. The site is currently accessible via a dirt accessway off Lurin Avenue. The preliminary site plan of the proposed Project shows that the site would be accessed via an improved internal road system off Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require construction activities on the off- site roadway system and therefore would not impair the City' s adopted emergency responseplan or emergency evacuation plan. Design of the proposed Project would include an internal circulation system developed to City of Riverside Requirements and Riverside Fire Department requirements. If residents need to evacuatethe area, they can exit the Project site on either Lurin Avenue or Obsidian Drive, accessTaft Street and connect with Van Buren Boulevard, where Interstate 215 can be accessed to exit the region.

The design of the Project would comply with the Riverside Municipal Code Sections 19.100 and 19.780 related to the development standardsfor a single-family residential units and PlannedResidential Development. Prior to the issuanceof the final building permit, the City would review site plans for the proposed Project to ensurethat design featureswould not PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration substantially impair emergency response or emergency evacuation plans of the City. Direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. g. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
101
9g. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PS -7 — Fire Hazard Areas, GIS Map Layer Very High Fire Severity Zone 2010, City of Riverside' s EOP, 2002, Riverside Operational Area — Multi - Jurisdictional LHMP, 2004 Part 1/ Part 2 and OEM' s Strategic Plan)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in a semi - urbanized portion of Riverside and is not located within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Very High or High Fire Hazard Severity Zone nor is it located within a StateResponsibility Area (SRA) Very High or High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, asdefinedby CAL FIRE andthe Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map programs. The Project site is approximately 0.29 mile from the closest SRA High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and 1.42 miles from the closest SRA Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The closest LRA Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is approximately 1.09 miles northwest of the Project site. The proposed Project would be developed with an internal circulation system consisting of neighborhood streetsthat would connect to Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. The internal neighborhood streetsand accesspoints to the Project site would be developedto meet the minimum roadway widths of Title 18 (Subdivision Code) and the City' s Fire Code Section 503 ( California Fire Code 2007). The Fire Code and City of Riverside would also confirm locations of fire hydrants within the Project site to adequately serve the 41 single-family residential units. With implementation of General Plan 2025 policies, compliance with existing codes and standards, and through Fire Department review and approval, impacts from wildland fires due to Project implementation are less than significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
10a.Response: (Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Table 5.8-A — Beneficial UsesReceiving Water; KWCEngineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project is located on 10. 06 acres at the southeast corner of Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive within the SanAna River Watershed. The Project site is mostly vacant (except for existing concrete foundations, a small outbuilding, and power poles to be relocated) and is completely pervious under existing conditions. Once developed, the proposedProject would increasethe impervious surfaceof the siteby 260,286 squarefeet. The site clearing and grading phases would disturb vegetation and surface soils, potentially resulting in erosion and sedimentation. If left exposed and with no vegetative cover, the site' s bare soil would be subject to wind and water erosion. Since the project involves more than one acre of ground disturbance, it is subject to NPDES requirements and must implement an SWPPP. Implementation of site- specific Best Management Practices ( BMPs) as established by the SWPPP would ensure all impacts related to erosion and sedimentation from ground disturbance are less than significant. No mitigation is required.

The Federal Clean Water Act ( CWA) establishesa framework for regulating municipal and industrial ( including construction) storm water dischargesunder the NPDES permit. Section 402(p) of the CWA requires NPDES permits for storm water discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems ( MS4), as well as other designated storm water discharges that are consideredsignificant contributors of pollutants. The SantaAna Regional Water Quality Control Board developedtheNPDES Permit and Waste Discharge Requirements (Order No. R8-2010-0033 or MS4 Permit) for the Riverside County Flood Control District and other local agencies. The City is a co -Permittee under this permit.

The City is located within the Riverside County Drainage Area ManagementPlan (DAMP), which describesa wide range of continuing and enhanced BMPs and control techniques, which are being implemented during the term of the MS4 permit. As the City is an MS4 co -Permittee andbecausethe DAMP addressesthe requirements of the to meet MS4 permit conditions, the City is required to enforce and comply with the storm water discharge requirements detailed in the DAMP.

There are no known existing water quality problems associated with the Project site. There are no major drainage improvements on the Project site and storm water runoff drains from the northwest to the northeast across the site.

A preliminary project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for the Project per City of Riverside Water Quality Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 14.12.315) requirements. The WQMP identifies one Drainage Management Area (DMA). DMA 1A would drain approximately 470,170 squarefeet into one bioretention basin (Bioretention Basin 1A) that will be developed on site.

All runoff is conveyed to Reach 1 of Temescal Creek, flowing downstream to Reach 3 of the SantaAna River, and ultimately into the Pacific Ocean. Reach 1 of Temescal Creek has no Section 303( d) impairments and Reach 3 of the Santa Ana River list pathogens (Bacterial Indicators) asEPA -approved Section303(D) listed impairments to water quality andarethe pollutants of concern of the proposed Project.

To addresspotential water contaminants, the Project is required to comply with applicable federal, State, and local water quality regulations, including the design and maintenance of the DMA 1A detailed in the Project -specific WQMP described above. The proposedsumpbasins, to where on-site runoff is designedto flow through DMA 1A, would infiltrate the maximum volume of runoff. Basedon calculations from the project -specific WQMP, DMA 1A would collectively managerunoff from 470, 170 square feet of the Project site and would require a minimum Design Capture Volume ( DCV) of 12, 880 cubic feet of runoff. Accordingly, DMA 1A would be treatedvia infiltration basin with DCV of 12,885 cubic feet (storageand volume retention). The DCV of the proposed BMP bioretention basins treating DMA 1A would satisfy the estimated detention volume PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration neededpost -development for the Project per the preliminary hydrology calculations. According to the preliminary WQMP, the full DCV would be met with the proposed BMP bioretention basins that would treat DMA 1A.

The WQMP would be reviewed and approved asa routine action during the processing of the Project by the City; therefore, it is reasonablethat the required measuresand features detailed in the WQMP to safeguard water quality would be incorporated into the proposed Project. Given compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws regulating surfacewater quality, the proposed Project asdesigned is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, and cumulatively to any water quality standardsor waste discharge. No mitigation is required. b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
10b. Response: ( Source: Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Table 7- 3:

Retail Supply and Demand Comparison for a Normal Year; Table 7-4: Wholesale Supply and Demand Comparison for a Normal Year; Table 7-5: Retail Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-6: Wholesale Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-7Retail Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple - Dry Years; Table 7- 8: Wholesale Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple -Dry Years, pgs. 7-5 through 7-7; KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Western Municipal Water District ( WMWD) provides water to the Project site.

Groundwater is a major source of water supply for WMWD and its retail agencies, comprising 13 percent of purchased water and 85 percentof locally produced water, representing21 percentof WMWD' stotal supply in 2015. Most groundwater sources available to WMWD are adjudicated or subject to groundwater managementplans. There are four primary groundwater basins that supply WMWD, including: Riverside -Arlington Basin ( and Arlington subbasin), the Temecula -Murrieta Basin, the San Bernardino Basin Area, and the Chino Basin.

The WMWD' s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan estimated a daily per capita water demand of 352 gallons per capita per day.2Implementationof theproposedProjectwouldresultin amaximumpopulationof 117residents (2.8625persons/household X 41 units), with an estimatedwater usageof 41,536 gallons per day (0.13 acre-feet/day) or 15,160,640 gallons per year (46.5 acre-feet/year). This represents0.07 percent of anticipated WMWD' s retail water supplies in 2020 (69,718 acre-feet assuming worst-casemultiple dry years), a 0.05 percentof anticipatedWMWD' sretail water suppliesin 2040 (90,400 acre-feet assuming worst-casemultiple dry years), a 0.03 percent of anticipated WMWD' s wholesale water supplies in 2020 ( 152,491 acre-feet assumingworst-casemultiple dry years), anda 0.025 percentof anticipatedWMWD' swholesalewatersuppliesin 2040 (184,095 acre-feet assuming worst-casemultiple dry years). Sufficient water supplies are available to serve existing and projected future water demandunder normal, dry and multiple -dry conditions. Therefore, the proposed Project was found to have a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively to groundwater supplies. No mitigation is required. c. Substantially alter the existing drainagepattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on - or -off- site? 0 l0i Response: (Source: KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G) 2 Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Section 5. 1 Update of Targets from 2010 UWMP, Table 5- 1 Revised SBX7- 7 Water Use Targets, page 5- 2, June 2016.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is mostly vacant and consistsof sparselyvegetatedland, occupiedby existing concrete foundations, a small outbuilding, and power poles to be relocated. The Project site drains from the northwest to the northeastbasedon the elevation changesand topography of the site. General sheetflow conditions would be maintained, and the Project site would be designed with infiltration BMP infiltration basins and permeable areas within DMA 1A to ensure runoff from regular rain eventsareretained on site. The proposedProject would not significantly alter drainagepatternson the site.

The proposed DMA 1A was analyzed to determine if its conveyance of storm water runoff would create a Hydrologic Condition of Concern ( HCOC). A HCOC occurs when post - development runoff conditions exceed pre -development runoff conditions, and discharge from the Project site has a flow rate greater than 110 percent of the pre -development two- year peak flow. Generally, projects are exempt from HCOC analysis if ( 1) they disturb less than one acre; (2) the volume and time of concentration of storm water runoff under post - development conditions are within five percent of pre - development conditions for a two-year return frequency24-hour storm; or (3) all downstreamconveyancechannelsto an adequatesump (e.g., Santa Ana River) engineeredand regularly maintainedto ensuredesign flow capacity, no sensitive streamhabitat areaswould be adversely affected, or they are not identified on the Co -Permittees Hydromodification Sensitivity Maps. Based on analysis presented in the preliminary WQMP, the Project does create a Hydrologic Condition of Concern and does not qualify for HCOC Exemption 1, 2, or 3. Low Impact Development BMPs would be implemented pursuant to the Preliminary Water Quality Management preparedfor the Project.

The proposed Project would implement one water quality managementplan basin to capture and convey storm water to the detention basin and then off the Project site. Based on calculations from the project - specific WQMP, DMA 1A would collectively managerunoff from 286,224 squarefeet of the Project site and would require a minimum DCV of 12,885 cubic feet of runoff. Accordingly, DMA 1A would be treated via infiltration basin with DCV of 12,880 cubic feet (storage and volume retention). The DCV of the proposed BMP infiltration basinstreating DMA 1A would satisfy the estimateddetention volume neededpost -development for the Project per the preliminary hydrology calculations. According to the preliminary WQMP, the full DCV would be met with the proposed infiltration BMP infiltration basins that would treat DMA 1A.

The WQMP would be reviewedandapprovedasaroutine action during theprocessingof the Projectby the City; therefore, it is reasonablethat the required measuresand features detailed in the WQMP to safeguardthe existing drainage pattern of the site and areawould be incorporatedinto the proposedProject. Theproject would not haveany substantialeffectson a streamor river, asnone are located on or in close proximity to the Project site. Through compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations, the proposed Project would not alter the existing drainage pattern of an on-site stream. Impacts from substantial erosion or siltation on or off site as a result of altering existing drainage patterns would be less than significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required. ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on -
or - off- site?
X
10ii Response: ( Source: KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the Ciry of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G) Less Than Significant Impact. The Preliminary Hydrology Report preparedfor the proposedProject indicated that the Project site during a 100 -year storm eventwould have apeak flow of 1.50 cubic feet squaredlessthan the existing peak flow. The on- site stormdrain systemwill be privately ownedandmaintainedby the HomeownersAssociation. Preliminary on-sitedrainage facilities will be sized to accommodate the anticipated 100 -year runoff. Detailed sizing calculations will be provided in the design review and final engineering processfor the proposed Project. Mainline pipe sizeswill be designedbased on the 100 - year storm event. Pipes will consist of reinforced concrete pipe or high-density polyethylene while maintaining the hydraulic gradeline below theproposedfinished surface, with aroughnesscoefficient of 0.013per City standards. Hydraulic calculations will be performed in the Final Engineering phase. Catch basinsand storm drain laterals will be placed at locations to keep the 10 -year flood flow below the top of curb and the 100 -year flood flow below the right- of- way. Catch basins will also be placed in various locations within the Project site to collect the runoff and convey the storm flows in underground piping to the appropriate discharge points.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration The proposed Project would implement one water quality management plan basin to capture and convey storm water to the detention basin and then off the Project site. Based on calculations from the project - specific WQMP, DMA 1A would collectively manage runoff from 286,224 square feet of the Project site and would require a minimum DCV of 12,885 cubic feet of runoff. Accordingly, DMA 1A would be treated via infiltration basin with DCV of 12,880 cubic feet (storage and volume retention). The DCV of the proposed BMP infiltration basinstreating DMA 1A would satisfy the estimateddetention volume needed post -development for the Project per the preliminary hydrology calculations. According to the preliminary WQMP, the full DCV would be met with the proposed infiltration BMP infiltration basins that would treat DMA 1A.

Through compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations, the proposed Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off site. Impacts from flooding on or off site asaresult of increasingthe rate or amount of surfacerunoff would be lessthan significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required. iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff; or
0 10iii Response: (Source: KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G) Less Than Significant Impact. The CWA delegates authority to the states to issue NPDES permits for discharges of storm water from construction, industrial, and municipal entities to Waters of the United States. The purpose of the California MS4 permit meets the California State Water Resources Control Board' s requirements to mitigate for the negative impact of increases in storm water runoff causedby new development and redevelopment. The Project storm water discharge rates cannot exceed the pre - development runoff condition for 2 -year 24- hour storm total or the 85th percentile 24- hour storm runoff event to be in compliance with the MS4 post - construction and site design requirements.

The proposedProject would include the development of awater quality managementplan basin in Lot D and a detentionbasin just to its south. Thesefeatures would help prevent increasesin the rate or volume of storm water runoff leaving the site. The Project is over one acre in size and is required to have coverage under the State' s General Permit for Construction Activities SWPPP). As stated in the permit, during and after construction, BMPs would be implemented to reduce/eliminate adverse water quality impacts resulting from development. All impacts related to runoff during site preparation, demolition, and grading would be addressedby the SWPPP. The site hasbeen designedto maximize the landscapeareas, thereby minimizing the impervious area to the maximum extent practicable. All runoff from the built Project site would disperse into infiltration basins or adjacent landscapeplanted areasprior to discharging into off- site storm water drainage infrastructure. The DCV 12,880 cubic feet) of the proposed BMP infiltration basins treating DMA 1A would satisfy the estimated detention volume neededpost -development for the Project per the preliminary hydrology calculations. According to the WQMP, the full DCV would be met with the proposed infiltration BMP infiltration and detention basins that would treat DMA 1A.

Any sourcesof storm water pollution would be addressedthrough adherenceto NPDES permit requirements. Compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws andregulations would ensureimpacts from generationof runoff water exceedingthe capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systemsor contributing substantialadditional sourcesof polluted runoff would be lessthan significant directly, indirectly, andcumulatively. No mitigation is required. iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? 0
10ivResponse: ( Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration FEMA Flood Map Service Center Website https:// msc.fema. gov/portal/ home. Map 06065C0740G) LessThan Significant Impact. The Flood InsuranceRateMap for the areawasreviewed on theFederalEmergencyManagement Agency website for the Project site. The Project site is located within an unmapped Zone X area (Flood Insurance Rate Map 06065C0740G). Given the existing topography of the Project site, flooding within the Project site is not likely to occur.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Implementation of the proposed Project would not impede or redirect flood flows. Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
0 10d. Response: (Source: GP 2025 FPEIR Chapter 7.5.8 — Hydrology and Water Quality; KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G) LessThan Significant Impact. TheProjectsiteislocatedinland andnolargebodiesof waterarelocatedwithin thesite'svicinity; therefore, the potential of tsunamis or seiches affecting the subject site is low. Further, the proposed Project site and its surroundingshavegenerally flat topographyandarewithin anurbanizedareanot within proximity to Lake Mathews, Lake Evans, the SantaAna River, Lake Hills, Norco Hills, Box Springs Mountain Area, or any of the nine arroyos that traverse the City and its sphereof influence. The Project site is located in an unmappedZone X areaper Flood InsuranceRate Map 06065C0740G.

Given the existing topography of the Project site, flooding within the Project site is not likely to occur. Given the proposed Project' s location and since there are no featuresnearby that would pose a threat from seiche, tsunami, or flooding, impacts are consideredlessthan significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required. e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? 0 10e. Response: ( Source: KWC Engineers, Preliminary Hydrology Report, TTM 37733 In the City of Riverside, July 2019, Appendix F; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix G)
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is located within a semi -urbanized portion of the City of Riverside within the Orangecrest Specific Plan area. Since the proposed Project involves more than one acre of ground disturbance, it is subject to NPDES requirements and must implement an SWPPP. Compliance with NPDES and implementation of an SWPPP would ensure the proposed Project does not conflict with or obstruct applicable City water quality control plans. The WQMP would be reviewed and approved asaroutine action during the processingof the Project by the City; therefore, it is reasonable that the required measuresand featuresdetailed in the WQMP to safeguardthe existing drainagepattern of the site and area would be incorporated into the proposed Project.

The WMWD' s 2015 Urban Water ManagementPlan estimateda daily per capita water demandof 352 gallons per capita per day.3Implementationof theproposedProjectwouldresultin amaximumpopulationof 117residents (2.86persons/householdX 41 units), with an estimatedwaterusageof 41,536 gallonsper day (0.13acre-feet/day) or 15,160,640 gallonsper year (46.5 acre- feet/year). This represents0.07 percent of anticipated WMWD' s retail water supplies in 2020 (69,718 acre-feet assuming worst- casemultiple dry years), a 0.05 percent of anticipated WMWD' s retail water supplies in 2040 (90,400 acre-feet assumingworst- casemultiple dry years), a 0.03 percentof anticipatedWMWD' s wholesalewater suppliesin 2020 (152,491 acre-feet assuming worst-casemultiple dry years), anda0.025 percentof anticipatedWMWD' swholesalewater suppliesin 2040 (184,095 acre-feet assumingworst-casemultiple dry years). Although a zoning changewould occur with implementationof the proposedProject, the General Plan Land Use designation of the site would remain the same. The WMWD ' s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan estimatedwater demandfor the City of Riverside is basedon land usedesignationsfrom the City of Riverside GeneralPlanLand Use and Urban Design Element ( November 2007). Since the Project site would not result in a General Plan Land Use Change, it can be assumed that the water demand of the Project has been accounted for in the WMWD' s 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the current groundwater management plan for the City of Riverside. Impacts would be less than significant directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation measuresarerequired.
3 Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Section 5. 1 Update of Targets from 2010 UWMP, Table 5- 1 Revised SBX7- 7 Water Use Targets, page 5- 2, June 2016.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

11. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an establishedcommunity? 0
11a. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025 Land Useand Urban Design Element, Project siteplan, City of Riverside GIS/ CADME map layers)
No Impact. The Project site is located within the City of Riverside in the Orangecrest Specific Plan area. Large lot single- family residential units and a single-family residential neighborhood are locatednorth of the site; a recently gradedparcel of land being preparedfor a development is located eastof the site; large lot single-family residential units are located to the south; and a vacant parcel of land for a future City Park is located to the west of the Project site. The site is therefore located in an established semi -urban portion of the City of Riverside. The Project would include an internal circulation system consisting of neighborhood streetsthat would connect to Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. The Project has been reviewed for consistency with the Zoning Code and to ensurethat the requestedperimeter setback variance would be consistent and conducive to similar surrounding development. The Project would not include featuressuchasroads (exceptfor internal roads connecting to existing Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive), highways, a transit system, or a non -consistent use that would constitute a physical divide in the establishedcommunity No impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively to an established community would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. No mitigation is required. b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X
11b. Response: (Source: General Plan 2025, General Plan 2025 Figure LU -10 — Land UsePolicy Map, Table LU -5 — Zoning/ General Plan Consistency Matrix, Figure L U- 7 — Redevelopment Areas, Title 19 — Zoning Code, Title 18 Subdivision Code, Title 7 — Noise Code, Title 17 — Grading Code, Title 20 — Cultural Resources Code, Title 16 — Buildings and Construction and Citywide Design and Sign Guidelines) LessThan Significant Impact. The existing RiversideGeneralPlanLand Use Designationonthe site is Low Density Residential LDR) andthe existing zoning of the site is OSP-RA- SP- Residential Agriculture and Specific Plan (Orangecrest) Overlay Zones.

The proposed Project includes cancellation of the Woodcrest Agricultural Preserve No. 3 and active Williamson Act Contract.

Upon cancellation of the Agricultural Preserve and Williamson Act Contract, the Project site would revert to the R- 1- 13000 zone.

The Project proposes 41 single-family residential lots ranging in size from 5,115 square feet to 7,679 squarefeet with an overall density of 4.08 dwelling units/acre, consistent with the General Plan Low Density Residential Land Use Designation of 3 to 6 dwelling units/acre. Pursuantto Section 19.780.060 of the Municipal Code, the benchmark density for the R- 1-13000 Zone is 4.8 dwelling units/acre. The Maximum Density with Bonus density for the R- 1-13000is 5.3 dwelling units/acre. Based on the overall density of the site pursuant to the site plans, the proposed Project would be consistent with the density requirements under Section 19.780.060 of the City of Riverside Municipal Code.

According to the Riverside 2025 General Plan Land Use and Urban Design Element, the Project site is located in the Orangecrest Specific Plan. The proposed Project would have to be consistent with applicable objectives and policies of the OrangecrestSpecific Plan. The following provides aconsistencyanalysisto showthat the proposedProject would be consistent with the Specific Plan' s applicable objectives/ policies.

Objective LU - 75: Manage continued growth of the Orangecrest neighborhood in a manner consistent with the Orangecrest Specific Plan, providing needed infrastructure as land develops.

Consistent: The proposed Project would develop a vacant (underutilized) site within the Orangecrest Specific Plan. The Project would include development of 41 single-family residential units, an internal circulation system, and a common use park. Such design would be consistent with the types of residential neighborhood development that occur within the Specific Plan area. This IS/ MND has analyzed the potential impact the Project would have on infrastructure/ public services with a determination that utility infrastructure and public services could adequately serve the residents of the PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration proposed Project without additional staffing, infrastructure, or building development. For thesereasons, development of the proposed Project would be consistent with this objective.

Policy LU -75.1: Avoid creating any hindrance to safe operations at the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port using the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan when reviewing projects within the airport influence area for consistency.

Consistent: The proposed Project is located within Zone E Other Airport Environs of the March Air Reserve Base Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (MARB ALUC). Zone E doesnot place any restrictions on the developmentof residential units. The proposed Project would develop residential units that are no taller than 35 feet in height above ground level based on the R- 1- 13000 zone designation standards); as such, the proposed Project would not intrude into FAR Part 77 airspace of the March Air Reserve Base/ Inland Port. Furthermore, the Project would not be designed with bright lights facing skyward or reflective material that could interfere with March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port operations. For these reasons, the proposedProject would be consistentwith this policy.

Overall, the Project uses would be consistent with uses permitted under the General Plan and the Orangecrest Specific Plan.

The project complies with all development standards for Planned Residential Developments, with the exception of the requestedvariance for a reduced perimeter landscape setback along Lurin Avenue. The Project would also be compatible with surrounding uses. As such, the proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact on any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

12. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of aknown mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the X
State?
12a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR — Figure 5. 10- 1 Mineral Resources) No Impact. According to General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5.10-1, the Project site is not designatedas a Mineral Resource Zone - 2 ( MRZ- 2) or Mineral Resource Zone - 3 ( MRZ- 3). The Project site is designated as a Mineral Resources Zone - 4 ( MRZ- 4). The MRZ- 4 designation indicates there is insufficient datato assignany other MRZ designation. The majority of the Project site is undeveloped. Due to the location of the Project site ( in a semi - urban area of Riverside and in an MRZ- 4), unknown mineral deposits would more than likely not be discovered or disturbed during proposed Project construction activities. As such, implementation of the proposed Project would have a no impact on statewide and regional mineral deposits directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required. b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resourcerecovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
X
12b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR — Figure 5. 10- 1 Mineral Resources) No Impact. Review of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5.10-1 indicates there are no mineral resource recovery sites delineatedwithin the City of Riverside. Additionally, asdescribedabovein Response12a, the Project site is not located within MRZ- 2 or MRZ- 3 areas and implementation of the proposed Project would not result in mineral resource losses. As such, implementation of the proposed Project would have no impact on locally -important mineral resourcesrecovery sites directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

13. NOISE
Would the project:
a. Result in generation of a substantialtemporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 13a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure N- 5 — 2025 Roadway Noise, Section 5.11 — Noise of the General Plan and Supporting Documents Environmental Impact Report; Project Site Plans; Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, November 2020, Appendix H) Less Than Significant Impact. The construction and operational noise analysis under this responsehas beenprovided by the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Technical Report prepared for the Project in November 2020 ( Appendix 11).

Construction and operational noise standardsfor the City of Riverside areprovided by the City of Riverside Noise Element of the General Plan 2025 and the City Municipal Code.

Noise Element of the General Plan 2025: In its land use decisions, the City may consider its noise/land use compatibility guidelines that describe categories of compatibility and not specific noise standards.

These guidelines generally identify conditions where development of a particular use may be " Normally Acceptable," Conditionally Acceptable," " Normally Unacceptable," or " Conditionally Unacceptable." The development of infill single residential usesis Normally Acceptable in areaswith noise levels of 65 dBA ( A -weighted decibel) Community Noise Equivalent Level ( CNEL) or less, andConditionally Acceptablein areaswith a noiselevelsbetween65and75 dBA CNEL.

For Conditionally Acceptable single-family residential uses, new development should only be undertaken after an analysis of noise reduction requirements and identification of noise reduction/insulation features. The City' s General Plan Noise Element requires interior noise levels for new residential development to comply with standardssetforth in Title 24 of the StateHealth and Safety Code, which identifies an interior noise standardof 45 dBA CNEL for residences.

Municipal Code: The purpose of the City' s Municipal Code Noise Ordinance is to control unnecessary, excessive, and/or annoyingnoisesin the City by prohibiting suchnoisegeneratedby the sourcesspecifiedin Title 7: Noise Control of the City' s Municipal Code. Basedon Sections7.25.010 and 7.30.015 of the City' s Municipal Code (and asshown in Table E of the Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis in Appendix H), the maximum exterior noise level for residential uses is 75 dBA maximum noise level ( L,,,) ( i.e., 55 dBA plus 20 dBA) during daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) hours and 65 dBA L. ( i. e., 45 dBA plus 20 dBA) during nighttime ( 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours, or the maximum measuredambient noise level for any period of time.

Similarly, the maximum interior noiselevel for residential usesis 55 dBA L. ( i.e., 45 dBA plus 10dBA) during daytime hours and 45 dBA L ( i.e., 35 dBA plus 10 dBA) during nighttime hours, or the maximum measuredambient noise level for any period of time. Section 7.35.020.G, Exemptions, of the City' s Municipal Code Noise Ordinance states that " Noise source associatedwith construction, repair, remodeling, or gradingof any real property; provided a permit hasbeenobtainedfrom the City asrequired; andprovided saidactivities do not takeplacebetweenthehoursof 7:00 p.m. and7:00 a.m. on weekdays, between the hoursof 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays, or at any time on Sundayor a federalholiday" areexempt from the noiselevel limits of the Municipal Code.

Existing Conditions: The Project site is locatedon the southsideof Lurin AvenuebetweenWood RoadandTaft Streetin the OrangecrestSpecific Plan area of Riverside. Land usesin the vicinity of the Project area include residencesand vacant land.

Single-family residential units are located north of Lurin Avenue between Taft Street and Wood Road and southeast, south, and southwest of the Project site. The closest single-family residential unit is located north of the site at 18800 Lurin Avenue, approximately 40 feet from the Project site construction boundary.

The primary existing noise sources in the Project area is generatedby traffic on Wood Road and Lurin Road, dogs barking, and other typical residential noises. In order to determine the existing ambient noise level in the Project area, two long-term 24-hour) and two short-term ( 20 -minute) noise level measurementswere conducted and recorded from February 5 to 6, 2020.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Noise levels from the long-term monitoring ranged between 51.0 to 55.5 dBA CNEL and the calculated CNEL noise level using the long-term measurementresults at short-term monitoring locations ranged between 47.9 to 48.6 dBA CNEL.

Existing traffic noise levels were modeled using the Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model ( FHWA- RD- 77- 108) to evaluate traffic -related noise conditions along roadway segments in the project vicinity. Table K: Existing Traffic Noise Levels shows the existing traffic noise levels on roadways in the Project vicinity and shows the noise level at 50 feet from the centerline of the outermost lanes of the listed roadway segments ranges from

50. 1 dBA CNEL to 64. 9 dBA CNEL.

Table K: Existing Traffic Noise Levels
Roadway Segment ADT
Centerline to
70 dBA
CNEL ( ft)
Centerline to
65 dBA
CNEL ( ft)
Centerline to
60 dBA
CNEL ( ft)
CNEL ( dBA) 50 ft
from Centerline of
Outermost Lane
Lurin Avenue Between Sagebrush Street
and Wood Road
567 50 50 50 50. 1
Wood Road Between Lurin Avenue and
Mariposa Avenue
8, 560 50 55 119 64. 9
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsid. an Development Project, LSA ( March 2020) Note: Traffic noise within 50 feet of the roadway centerline should be evaluated with site-specific information.

ADT = averagedaily traffic dBA = A - weighted decibels
CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level ft = foot/ feet Short -Term Construction Noise: Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction on the Project site.

First, construction crew commutes and the transport of construction equipment and materials to the site for the proposed Project would incrementally increasenoise levels on roads leading to the site. Although there would be a relatively high single -event noise exposure potential causing intermittent noise nuisance (passing trucks at 50 feet would generateup to a maximum of 84 dBA), the effect on longer-term (hourly or daily) ambient noise levels would be small becausethe hourly/ daily construction - related vehicle trips are few when compared to existing hourly/ daily traffic volume on Lurin Avenue and Wood Road. The grading phaseof construction would generatethe most trips out of all of the construction phasesat 20 trips per hour and 40 trips per day. Roadways that would be used to accessthe Project site are Lurin Avenue and Wood Road. Based on Table K, Lurin Avenue and Wood Road have estimated existing hourly/ daily traffic volumes of 57/567 and 856/8,560, respectively, near the Project site. Based on the information above, construction -related traffic would increase noise by up to 1.3 dBA. A noise level increase of less than 3 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Therefore, no short- term construction - related noise impacts associated with worker commute and equipment transport to the Project site would occur. No noise reduction measures are required.

The secondtype of short-term noiseimpact is relatedto noisegeneratedduring sitepreparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating on the project site. Construction is undertaken in discrete steps, each of which has its own mix of equipment and, consequently, its own noise characteristics. Project construction is expected to require the use of graders, bulldozers, and water trucks/pickup trucks. Noise associated with the use of each type of construction equipment for the site preparation phase is estimated to be between 55 dBA Lm and 85 dBA L. at a distance of 50 feet from the active construction area. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operatesat some distance from the other equipment, the worst- casecombined noise level during this phaseof construction would be 88 dBA L. at a distance of 50 feet from the active construction area. Based on a usage factor of 40 percent, the worst-case combined noise level during this phase of construction would be 84 dBA equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) at a distanceof 50 feet from the active construction area.

The closest residential property line is located approximately 40 feet from the Project construction boundary and may be subject to short-term construction noise reaching 90 dBA L. ( 86dBA Leq) generatedby constructionactivities in the Project area. Ambient noise levels at the project site range between 45.0 to 56.7 dBA Leqbased on the long-term noise level measurements. Although the noise generatedby Project construction activities would be higher than the ambient noise levels and would result in a temporary increasein the ambient noise levels, construction noise would stop once Project construction PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration is completed. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the construction hours allowed under the City' s Municipal Code Noise Ordinance and standard construction measures listed below:

During all Project site excavation and grading, the Project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards.

The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areasthat will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and most noise -sensitive receptors nearest the Project site during all Project construction.

The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that the emitted noise is directed away from the sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. Sensitive receptors nearest to the Project site include residences to the north, south, and west. The school is located to the west.

With the implementation of the standardconstruction measureslisted above, Project construction noise would not exceedCity noise standardsfor nearby sensitive receptors. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measureswould be needed.

Long -Term Off -Site Traffic Noise: The FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model ( FHWA- RD- 77-108) was used to evaluate roadway traffic -related noise conditions along roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed Project under the following scenarios:

Existing Year ( 2020) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With the Project; Project Completion ( 2021) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With the Project; and Cumulative ( 2021) Traffic Noise Levels Without and With the Project.

Noise level increases below 3 dBA would not be perceptible to the human ear in an outdoor environment. Furthermore, an increase or decreasein noise level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community responsewould be expected.' Therefore, the City' s ambient noise threshold is a clearly perceptible increaseof 5 dBA in for ambient noise increasesto beconsideredsignificant.5TablesPandQ in theNoiseand VibrationImpactAnalysisreportshowthattheproject - related traffic noise increase would be no greater than 2. 5 dBA under all of the scenarios. As such, Project - related traffic noise increases on off- site sensitive receptors would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are required.

Long -Term Off -Site Stationary Noise: Adjacent off- site land uses could potentially be exposed to stationary -source noise impacts from the proposed on-site heating, ventilation, and air conditioning ( HVAC) equipment.

The proposed Project includes on-site ground -floor HVAC units for each residential unit that could potentially operate 24 hours per day. The HVAC equipment would generatenoise levels of 66.5 dBA Leqat 5 feet basedon previous measurements conductedby LSA for similar project types. Table L: HVAC Noise Levels shows the noise levels generatedby HVAC equipment at the property line of the closestoff- site land usealong with distanceattenuation and shielding. As shown in Table L, noise levels generatedfrom on-site HVAC units would not exceedthe City' s exterior daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime ( 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) 30 -minute (L5o) noise standardsof 55 dBA and 45 dBA, respectively, for residential uses except for the residential units north and south of the Project site. 4 Section 5. 11 — Noise of the General Plan and Supporting Documents Environmental Impact Report. Page 5.11-26. Albert A. Webb Associates. Certified November 2007.
5 Ibid.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Table L: HVAC Noise Levels
Land Use Direction
Reference
Noise Level
at 5 feet
dBA)
Distance
from
Source to
Off- site
Property
Line ( feet)
Distance
Attenuation
dBA)
Exterior Noise
Level ( dBA Leq)
Interior Noise Level
dBA Leq)
Residential North 66. 5 55 20. 8 45. 7 21. 7
Residential Southeast 66. 5 185 31. 4 35. 1 11. 1
Residential South 66. 5 40 18. 1 48. 4 24. 4
Residential Southwest 66. 5 110 26. 8 39. 7 15. 7
Residential Northwest 66. 5 95 25. 6 40. 9 16. 9
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, LSA ( March 2020) Average distanceto the property line of off-site land uses.

Protective Noise Levels ( EPA 1978).
dBA = A -weighted decibel
EPA = United Stated Environmental Protection Agency
HVAC = heating, ventilation, andair conditioning
L, Q = equivalent continuous sound level
Although the residential units north and south of the Project site would be exposedto noise levels exceedingthe City' sexterior nighttime 30 -minute noise standard of 45 dBA, the City allows the 30 -minute noise standardto reachup to 50 dBA. In addition, interior noise levels generatedfrom on-site HVAC units would not exceedthe City' s interior daytime and nighttime 30 -minute noise standardsof 45 dBA and 35 dBA, respectively, for residential uses. Therefore, no off- site noise impacts generated from on- site HVAC equipment would occur. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

Land Use Compatibility Assessment: The land use compatibility of the Project site was assessedbased on the Noise/Land Use Compatibility Criteria in the City of Riverside General Plan Noise Element. Table G of the General Plan Noise Element showsthat single-family residential usesare considered "Normally Acceptable" in areaswith noise levels of 60 dBA CNEL or less and "Conditionally Acceptable" in areaswith a noise levels between 60 and 65 dBA CNEL.

Table M: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Exterior Traffic Noise Levels shows the Cumulative ( 2021) with Project exterior traffic noise levels at the nearestresidential property line from the adjacent roadway. As shown in Table M, traffic noise levels at the property line of on-site first -row residencesrange between 48.8 dBA CNEL and 55.1 dBA CNEL, which are "normally acceptable" basedon the threshold limits of the City.

Table M: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Exterior Traffic Noise Levels Distance from Roadway Centerline to Exterior Noise Level at the Property Line First - Row Residences Property Line ( feet) dBA CNEL)
Lurin Avenue 38 55. 1
Wood Road 663 48. 8
Obsidian Drive 38 53. 1
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, LSA ( March 2020) CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA = A -weighted decibels
Based on the United States EPA Protective Noise Levels ( 1978), standard construction for Southern California ( warm climate) residential buildings would provide 12 dBA or more with windows and doors open ( the national average is 15 dBA) and 24 dBA or more with windows and doors closed ( the national average is 25 dBA). As shown in Table N: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Interior Traffic Noise Levels, with windows and doors open, first - row residences would not exceed the interior PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Therefore, no interior noise impacts would occur and no noise reduction measures are required.

Table N: Cumulative ( 2021) with Project Interior Traffic Noise Levels First - Row Residences
Distance from
Roadway Centerline to
Building Setback Line
feet)
Exterior Noise
Level at the
Building ( dBA
CNEL)
Interior Noise Level
with Windows/ Doors
Open' ( dBA CNEL)
Interior Noise Levels
with Windows/ Doors
Closed' ( dBA CNEL)
Lurin Avenue 44 54. 2 42. 2 30. 2
Wood Road 663 48. 8 36. 8 24. 8
Obsidian Drive 59 50. 3 38. 3 26. 3
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Tentative Tract Map No. 37732 -Barton Development Project, LSA ( February 2020) The interior noise level with windows and doors open was calculated based on an exterior - to - interior noise reduction of 12 dBA based on the EPA Protective Noise Levels ( EPA 1978).
2 The interior noise level with windows and doors closed was calculated based on an exterior - to -interior noise reduction of 24 dBA based on the EPA Protective Noise Levels ( EPA 1978).

CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
dBA = A - weighted decibels
EPA = United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency
In summary, the proposed Project would not result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project in excessof standardsestablishedby the City of Riverside GeneralPlan or Municipal Code. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b. Result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
0 13b. Response: ( Source: Project Site Plans; Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, March 2020, Appendix X; Federal Transit Authority' s (FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual)
Less Than Significant Impact. Vibration refers to groundborne noise and perceptible motion, which is almost exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived asa problem outdoors, where the motion may be discernable, but without the effects associatedwith the shaking of a building there is less adversereaction. The vibration standardsincluded in the Federal Transit Authority' s ( FTA) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual were used to evaluate operational and construction vibration levels related to Project implementation.

Occupation of the proposed single-family residential units on the site is not expected to generate vibration. In addition, vibration generated from project - related traffic on the adjacent roadways would be unusual for on -road vehicles because the rubber tires and suspension systems of vehicles provide vibration isolation. Therefore, vibration generated from project - related traffic on the adjacent roadways, and Project operation in general, would be less than significant.

Table 0: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria lists the potential vibration building damagecriteria associatedwith construction activities, as suggested by the Transit Noise and Vibration AssessmentModel prepared by the FTA. The guidelines in Table 0 showthat avibration level of up to 102VdB ( vibration velocity decibels) is consideredsafefor buildings consisting of reinforced concrete, steel, or timber (no plaster) and would not result in any construction vibration damage. For non -engineered -timber and masonry buildings, the construction building vibration damage criterion is 94 VdB.

During construction, outdoor site preparation for the proposed Project is expectedto require the use of a large bulldozer and loaded trucks, which would generate groundborne vibration of up to 87 VdB and 86 VdB when measured at 25 feet, respectively. Table P: Summary of Construction Vibration Levels shows the projected vibration levels from various construction equipment expected to be used on the Project site to the closest sensitive receptors in the Project vicinity.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Table 0: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria
Building Category PPV ( in/ sec) , Approximate L, ( VdB) 1 Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber
no plaster) 0. 50 102
Reinforced concrete, steel, or
timber ( no plaster) 0. 50 102
Reinforced concrete, steel, or timber ( no plaster) 0. 50 102 Engineered concrete and masonry (no
plaster) 0. 30 98
Engineered concrete and
masonry (no plaster) 0.30 98
Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 0.30 98
Non -engineered timber and masonry
buildings 0. 20 94
Non - engineered timber and
masonrybuildings 0.20 94
Non -engineeredtimber andmasonry buildings 0.20 94
Buildings extremely susceptibleto
vibration damage 0. 12 90
Buildings extremely susceptible
to vibration damage 0. 12 90
Buildings extremely susceptibleto vibration damage0.1290 Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, LSA ( March 2020) 1 RMS VdB 1 gin/ sec.
pin/ sec. = micro - inches per second Lv = velocity in decibels PPV = peak particle velocity in/ sec = inches/ second
RMS = root - mean - square VdB = vibration velocity decibels Table P: Summary of Construction Vibration Levels
Land Use Direction
Equipment
Activity
Reference
Vibration Level
PPV) at 25 feet
Reference
Vibration
Level ( PPV) at
25 feet
Distance
feet)
Maximum
Vibration
Level ( VdB)
Maximum
Vibration
Level ( PPV)
Residential
18800 Lurin
Avenue)
North
Large
Bulldozers
87 0. 089 75 73 0. 017
Loaded
Trucks
86 0. 076 75 72 0. 015
Residential
18870Doving
Lane)
Southeast
Large
Bulldozers
87 0. 089 80 72 0. 016
Loaded
Trucks
86 0. 076 80 71 0. 013
Residential
18820 Mariposa
Avenue)
South
Large
Bulldozers
87 0. 089 85 71 0. 014
Loaded
Trucks
86 0. 076 85 70 0. 012
Residential
16875 Obsidian
Drive)
Southwest
Large
Bulldozers
87 0. 089 110 68 0. 010
Loaded
Trucks
86 0. 076 110 67 0. 008
Residential
18728 Lurin
Avenue)
Southwest
Large
Bulldozers
87 0. 089 80 72 0. 016
Loaded
Trucks
86 0. 076 80 71 0. 013
Source: Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis Obsidian Development Project, LSA ( March 2020) Note: The FTA -recommendedbuilding damagethreshold is 94 VdB ( 0.2 PPV [in/sec]) for building structuresconstructedof non -engineeredtimber and masonry.

FTA = United StatesFederal Transit Administration; in/ sec = inches per second; PPV = peak particle velocity; VdB = vibration velocity decibels All structures surrounding the Project site would experience vibration levels of up to 73 VdB ( 0.017 PPV [ inches/second]) or lower. This vibration level would not result in community annoyancebecausevibration levels would not exceed the FTA community annoyancethreshold of 78 VdB for residential usesduring daytime hours. In addition, this vibration level would not havethe potential to result in building damagebecausethesebuildings were observedto be constructedof non -engineered timber and masonry, and the vibration level would not exceed the FTA vibration damage threshold of 94 VdB ( 0.2 PPV PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration in/ sec]). Therefore, no construction vibration impacts would occur during Project construction. No vibration reduction measures are required. Implementation of the proposed Project would not generate construction or operational vibration levels that would exceed threshold standards. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are warranted. c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
13c. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 FPEIR Figure 5. 11- 10 March ARB Noise Contours; Google Earth; Noise and Vibration Analysis ( November 2020) Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project LSA, Appendix H)
No Impact. The nearest airport to the Project site is the March Air Reserve Base, located approximately 3.8 miles eastof the site. Review of Figure 5.11-10in the City' s GeneralPlan 2025 FPEIR shows that the Project site is not within any of the noise contours of March Air Reserve Base. Riverside Municipal Airport is located approximately 7.6 miles northwest of the Project site; therefore, the Project site is far enough away to not be affected by this airport' s noise contours. Implementation of the proposed Project would not exposeon-site construction workers, workers, or residentsto excessivenoise levels from nearby airport operations. No impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively would occur with Project implementation andno mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

14. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly ( for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ( for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
0 14a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Table LU - 3 — Land Use Designations, FPEIR Table 5. 12- A — SCAG Population and Households Forecast, Table 5. 12- B — General Plan Population and Employment Projections - 2025, Table 5. 12- C — 2025 General Plan and SCAG Comparisons, Table 5. 12- D - General Plan Housing Projections 2025, Capital Improvement Program and SCAG' s Regional Comprehensive Plan ( RCP) and RTP) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project proposes the construction of 41 single-family residential units on a vacant 9.08 - acre parcel. The Project is in a semi - urbanized area and would not induce substantial population growth, as the addition of 41 single-family residential units represents approximately 0.034 percent of the projected 118,600 housing units anticipated by 2040 in the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/SustainableCommunities Strategy (RTP/SCS) housing projections for 2040.

Based on the 2.86 person per household estimated in Riverside in 2019 the proposed Project could increase the City' s population by approximately 117 people. Table Q: SCAG Population Projections details the 2015 and 2040 population of the City, Riverside County, and the region.

Table Q: SCAG Population Projections
2015 2040
Population Employment Population Employment
City of Riverside 310, 700 120, 000 386, 600 200, 500
Riverside County 2, 316, 438 742, 000 3, 167, 584 1, 174, 500 SCAG 18, 779, 123 8, 006, 030 18, 779123 9, 871, 441
Source: Tables 8 and 11, Demographic and Growth Forecast, 2016- 2040 RTP/ SCS, Southern California Association of Governments, December 2015.

SCAG' s 2016 RTP/SCSestablishespopulation, housing, and growth trends for the City, Riverside County, and SCAG region.

According to the 2016 RTP/SCS, the forecast population for the County of Riverside Sub -region in 2040 is approximately 3,167,584 persons. In 2015, the County of Riverside was reported to have a population of approximately 2,316,438 persons.

Therefore, the forecast population for the County of Riverside would grow by approximately 851,146personsbetween 2015 and 2040. Based on an anticipated increase of 117 persons, Project residents would account for 0. 014 percent of the population growth forecastby SCAG in the County of Riverside between 2015 and 2040.

SCAG foresees that population would increase in the City and region over the next 25 years, and the anticipated rate of population growth in the City ( 2.4 percent) is roughly similar to that of Riverside County ( 2.0 percent) and the SCAG region increase in population by approximately 117 persons has been anticipated and planned for in the City' s General Plan.

Additionally, the Project doesnot include any significant infrastructure improvements or the extension of roads that could indirectly induce growth in the City. Therefore, this Project would have a less than significant impact on population growth directly, indirectly, and cumulatively. No mitigation is required. b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
14b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025, General Plan 2025 Housing Element Update 2014 — 2021; California Department of Finance)
No Impact. The Project site is currently vacant except for a concrete foundation from a single-family residential unit that was removed between2013 and 2014. Once the Project site is developed, a total of 41 single-family residential units would be built on site. The site would be developed at an overall density of 4.08 dwelling units/acre and would include a minimum lot PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration size of 5, 115 square feet and a maximum lot size of 7, 679 square feet. The development on the Project site, based on the current personper household estimate in the City, would provide housing for approximately 117 residents.

Implementation of the Project would not displace existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere as the Project in itself would add neededhousing to the City' s inventory. No impact on housing either directly, indirectly, or cumulatively would occur with Project implementation. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a. Fire protection? 0
15a. Response: ( Source: FPEIR Table 5. 13- B — Fire Station Locations, Table 5. 13- C — Riverside Fire Department Statistics and Ordinance 5948 § 1)
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Riverside Fire Depaiti, ient provides fire protection serviceto the subject site. Fire Station 11, located at 19595 OrangeTerrace Parkway, approximately 1.79 miles northeast of the site, would be the closestfire station serving the proposed Project. The City' s Fire Department policy statesthat stations would be located and staffed in suchthat an effective responseforce of 4 units with 12personnelminimum shall be available to all areasof the City within a maximum of 10 minutes ( total response time).

Implementation of the proposed Project would add 117residentsto the City of Riverside; however, this increase in residents is accounted for in the General Plan 2025 Land Use Plan and the development density of the site would be consistent with City Zoning Development Standards. The operation of the City' s Fire Department would continue to provide adequateservice asthe City developsto its buildout potential.

Implementation of the proposed Project would generate an incremental increase in the demand for fire protection services; however, the increasein population would be limited by density development standardsper the City' s Zoning Codeand would not demand an increase in fire service such that new or expanded facilities would be needed.

The proposed Project would implement General Plan 2025 policies pertaining to fire protection, comply with existing codes and standards (California Fire Code and Riverside Municipal Code Section 16.32.10) and comply with Chapter 16.52.010 of the City' s Municipal Codepertaining to the payment for developmentfeesto be utilized for the purchaseof land for and the construction of fire stations and the acquisition of equipment and furnishings to equip fire stations. The Project' s final development plan would also be reviewed and approved by the City' s Fire Prevention Bureau. With these standard measures implemented, the proposed Project would generate a less than significant impact on Riverside' s fire protection services. No mitigation is required.
b. Police protection?
15b. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Public Safety Element pgs. 34-39; Project Set Plan; City of Riverside, Riverside Police Department, Operations, Website: https:// www. riversideca. gov/ rpd/ about- contact/ operations/ field- operations/about, AccessedJanuary 22, 2021)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Riverside Police Department (RPD) provides law enforcementservicesto the City of Riverside and the Project site. The Magnolia Neighborhood Policing Center, openedin 2006 at 10540-B Magnolia Avenue, approximately 9.5 miles northwest of the Project site, is the base of operations for Central and West Neighborhood Policing Center Field Operations, Central and Special Investigations, Special Operations, Central and Special Investigations, Special Operations, Policing, Training, and the Record Bureau. The RPD employs 130 sworn officers, 24 Sergeants, 6 Lieutenant Watch Commanders, 1 Executive Lieutenant, 1 Traffic Lieutenant, and civilian support staff. As part of the Riverside RenaissanceInitiative, a new Public Safety Administrative building, 911 Dispatch and Data Center and Neighborhood Police Center are proposed in the future.

Implementation of the Project would add 117 residents to the existing population of the City. Residential development, such as that proposed by the Project, typically generatescalls for law enforcement service due to residential break-ins, vehicle burglaries and break- ins, and general disturbances. The design of the proposed Project would include a 6 -foot tall perimeter PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration wall, exterior building lighting, and streetlighting, all consideredfeaturesof Crime Prevention through Environmental Design technique, to reduce on- site crime and thus reduce law enforcement calls of service to the Project site.

An incremental increase in law enforcement calls to the Project site could occur; however, such calls would be consistent to the types of calls RPD respondsto at similar residential developments within the City. Implementation of the Project would not degradethe RPD' s performance to the point that a new facility or expansion of an existing facility would be needed. With implementation of General Plan 2025 policies, compliance with existing codes and standards, and through Police Department practices, there would be a less than significant impact on the demand for additional law enforcement facilities of services either directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required. c. Schools? 0
15c. Response: (Source: California Department of Education, https:// www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/dataquest asp; General Plan 2025 Final EIR, Section 5. 13 Public Services pgs. 5. 13- 8 to 5. 13- 14) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project is located within the Riverside Unified School District ( RUSD), which had a 2019- 2020 total enrollment of 41,617 students. The following schools within the RUSD would provide education services to students of the proposed Project:

Mark Twain Elementary School is located at 19411Krameria Avenue, approximately 0.94 mile eastof the Project site. This school had a 2019- 2020 enrollment of 1,068 students.

Frank Augustus Miller Middle School is located at 17925 Krameria Avenue, approximately 0.95 mile west of the Project site. This school had a 2019- 2020 enrollment of 1,035 students.

Martin Luther King High School is located at 9301 Wood Road, approximately 0.62 mile north of the Project site.

This school had a 2019- 2020 enrollment of 3, 058 students.

According to the Final EIR of the General Plan 2025, RUSD contains many schoolsthat arenear or over capacity and arelocated in areaswhere vacant land to expand is not available. The school district is in need of new elementary and high school sites to meet the needsof theprojected studentpopulation within its district asthe City of Riverside reachesfull buildout. Table 5.13-G in the Final EIR of the General Plan 2025, indicates that the maximum with PRD development buildout of land within the RUSD boundary would generate136,716 students. Basedon the student generation factor of RUSD, the proposed Project is estimated to generate 29 students ( 0. 70 x 41 residential units) who would attend schools within RUSD. The total students generated includes 15 elementary school students (0.38 x 41 residential units), 5 middle school students (0.11 x 41 residential units), and 9 high school students ( 0. 21 x 41 residential units). It should be noted, the generation of students for the Project site has been anticipatedin the Riverside GeneralPlan 2025 basedon the site's existing land useandzoning designations.

The Project applicant would be required to pay RUSD impact fees for new residential construction and, pursuant to Government Code Section 65995, such impact fee payment would offset potentially significant impacts to school facilities due to Project implementation. Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. d. Parks? 0
15d. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PR - 1 — Parks, Open Spaces and Trails, Table PR - 4 — Park and Recreation Facilities, Parks Master Plan 2003, GP 2025 FPEIR Table 5. 14- A — Park and Recreation Facility Types; Project Site Plan)
Less Than Significant Impact. Bergamont Park, located at 19275 Bergamont Drive, is the closest park to the Project site

1.29 miles). This park is approximately 5.32 acres and includes the following amenities: basketball half courts, playground, picnic tables, andexercisecourse. Mission RanchPark, a 12.6 -acrefuture City -owned park, will be developedon the southeast corner of Obsidian Drive and Lurin Avenue. This park is proposed to have multipurpose fields, a playground, and picnic tables.

The General Plan EIR indicates that the City currently has a parkland to population ratio standard of 3 acres per 1,000 population. The proposed Project will develop 41 residential units and, if fully occupied, would house 117 residents. The City PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration of Riverside, through the zoning code, requires residential development projects to include park areasequating to 500 square feet per planned residential unit. As such, the proposed Project would require the development of 20, 500 square feet of park/ open space within its boundaries.

The proposed Project, consistent with Zoning development standards, would include the development of park spacewith a variety of amenities in one location within the site. The park would equateto approximately 20,574 squarefeet of land and would include BBQ facilities, picnic tables, tot play areas, rubberized walking paths, turf play areas, and a dog run. As such, the proposedProject would exceedthe park requirement standardsassetforth by the City of Riverside development standards.

The population generatedby proposed Project has the potential to incrementally increase the use of off- site nearby parks; however, such use would be nominal due to the fact that the project would provide parkland as part of its design. Furthermore, the Project applicant would be required to pay parkland development impact fees for regional parks, local parks, and aquatics facilities to ensure that enough parkland is provided to residents in the City of Riverside. The proposed Project would not generatethe needto develop new parks or expandexisting parks within theCity. Project impactswould be lessthan significant and no mitigation is required.
e. Other public facilities?
15e. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure LU - 8 — Community Facilities, FPEIR Figure 5.13-5 - Library Facilities, Figure 5. 13- 6 - Community Centers, Table 5.3-F — Riverside Community Centers, Table 5.13-H — Riverside Public Library Service Standards)
Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Riversideprovideslibrary servicesto its residentsthrough aMain Library locatedat 3581Mission Inn Avenue and six branchlibraries (Arlington Neighborhood Library, CasaBlanca Family Learning Center, Marcy Branch, La Sierra Neighborhood Library, Orange Terrace Library, and EastsideLibrary and Cybrary) located throughout the City. The City of Riverside Public Library Systemprovides over 600,000 books and other library materials to residentsin the City. The Woodcrest Community Library, located at 16625Krameria Avenue (approximately 2.3 miles west of the Project site), is the closestlibrary that would serveresidentsoccupying the Project site.

Community centers, senior centers, and service centers are other public facilities provided by the City to provide various services to residents. The centers offer a wide range of services that include computer training, English as a second language classes, fitness andwellnessprograms, early childhood programs, aquatics, social recreation programs, specialty classes, sports programs, field trips, and a variety of cultural and holiday activities. Ysmael Villegas Center, located at 7260 Marguerita Avenue, is the closest community center that would serve Project residents; the Cesar Chavez Center, located at 2060 University Avenue, is the closest service center that would serveProject residents; and JanetGoeskeSenior Center, located at 5257 Sierra Avenue, is the closest senior center that would serve project residents.

The population increase generatedby the proposed Project would result in an incremental increase in the use of public libraries and other public facilities. However, this increase would be nominal and would not require the construction of new public facilities or expansionof existing public facilities. Project impacts would be lessthan significant andno mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

16. RECREATION
Would the project:
a. Increasethe use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 0 16a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Figure PR - 1 — Parks, Open Spaces and Trails, Table PR - 4 — Park and Recreation Facilities, Figure CCM -6 — Master plan of Trails and Bikeways, Parks Master Plan 2003, FPEIR Table

5. 14- A — Park and Recreation Facility Types, and Table 5.14-C — Park and Recreation Facilities Funded in the Riverside Renaissance Initiative, Table 5. 14- D — Inventory of Existing Community Centers, Riverside Municipal Code Chapter 16.60 - Local Park Development Fees, Bicycle Master Plan May 2007) Less Than Significant Impact. Bergamont Park, located at 19275 Bergamont Drive, is the closest park to the Project site

1.29 miles). This park is approximately 5.32 acresand includes the following amenities: basketball half courts, playground, picnic tables, and exercise course. Mission Ranch Park, a 12.6 -acrefuture City -owned park, will be developed on the southeast corner of Obsidian Drive and Lurin Avenue. This park is proposed to have multipurpose fields, a playground, and picnic tables.

As detailed in Figure 5.14-2 Trails Map of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR, the closesttrail to the Project site is designatedasa City of Riverside Trail along Wood Road. As population increases in the City of Riverside, the need for park and other recreational facilities rises due to the additional strain on upkeep and maintenancethat is required from the City.

The proposed Project would include the development of 20,574 square feet of park space on site, which includes BBQ facilities, picnic tables, tot play areas, rubberized walking paths, turf play areas, and a dog run. The amount of park space provided would exceedthe 20,500 squarefeet of common usable open space/recreational facilities spacerequired by Section

19.780.060 of the Riverside Municipal Code. The Project featureswould help in reducing increasedusesand deterioration of existing City recreational amenities as residents would be more apt to use the on-site facilities. In addition, as a condition of approval, the Project applicant would be required to pay parkland development impacts fees for regional parks, local parks, and aquatics facilities, which would help in maintaining recreation amenities within the City.

As the Project will include on-site recreational amenities and pay parkland development impact feesasa condition of approval, implementation of the proposedProject would not increasethe useor deterioration of the City' s recreational amenities. Direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
16b. Response: ( Source: Project Site Plan, General Plan 2025 Figure PR - 1 — Parks, Open Spaces and Trails, Table PR - 4 — Park and Recreation Facilities, Figure CCM -6 — Master plan of Trails and Bikeways, Parks Master Plan 2003, FPEIR Table 5. 14- A — Park and Recreation Facility Types, and Table 5.14-C — Park and Recreation Facilities Funded in the Riverside RenaissanceInitiative, Table 5.14-D — Inventory of Existing Community Centers, Riverside Municipal CodeChapter 16.60 - Local Park Development Fees, Bicycle Master Plan May 2007) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would include the development of 20, 527 square feet of park space on site, which includes BBQ facilities, picnic tables, tot play areas, rubberized walking paths, turf play areas, and a dog run. The amount of park space provided would exceed the 20, 500 square feet of common usable open space/ recreational facilities space requiredby Section 19.780.060 of the Riverside Municipal Code. The park spaceof the proposedProject would be developed in accordancewith the City' s General Plan 2025, Park and Recreation Master Plan, and all other applicable local, State, and/or federal regulatory requirements. As the Project includes recreational amenities within the on-site park that would be usedby the Project residents, the use of off- site City -owned recreational facilities would be minimal compared to existing conditions, and would not necessitate expansion solely due to Project implementation. Direct, indirect, and cumulative project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

17. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressingthe circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
0 17a.Response: ( Source: LSA, Obsidian Residential Project Trip Generation Memorandum, March 6, 2020; City of Riverside Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide April 2019) Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Riverside Traffic Impact Analysis Preparation Guide indicates that land usesthat generate between 50 and 100 peak hour trips are required to prepare a focused traffic impact analysis to determine if the local circulation systemwould be affected by a specific project. A memorandum titled Obsidian Residential Project Trip Generation was prepared for the proposed Project in March 2020 to determine whether a focused Traffic Operational Analysis was required for the proposedProject. The proposedProject was determinedto generate31 trips the a.m. peak hour, 40 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 387 daily trips. Since the proposed Project will generate fewer than 50 peak hour trips, a focused Traffic Operational Analysis is not required and it can be assumed that the level of service for local street segments and intersections would not be degraded with implementation of the proposed Project.

Under the proposed Project, improvements will only occur on the site. No improvements to the local transit system or bicycle and pedestrian facilities off of the Project site will occur. The internal circulation system on the Project site will be developed to be consistentwith City of Riverside and Riverside Fire Departmentroadway width requirementsaspart of the conditions of approval of the Project. Sidewalks will be installed along the internal street system to promote pedestrian movement. As bicycle lanes will not be developed on the internal roads of the Project site, bicyclists will be able to share the road with vehicles.

Overall, implementation of the Project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressingthe circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA X Guidelines Section 15064. 3, subdivision ( b)?
17b. Response: ( Source: LSA, Obsidian Residential Project Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, March 12, 2021) Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. On December 28, 2018, the California Office of Administrative Law cleared the revised CEQA Guidelines for use. Among the changesto the guidelines was removal of vehicle delay and level of service from consideration under CEQA. With the adopted guidelines, transportation impacts were required to be evaluated basedon a project' s generation of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The City of Riverside adoptednew VMT analysis guidelines in July 2020; therefore, all projects where environmental documentation wascommencedafter July 2020 neededto beanalyzed and compliant with the City' s Draft Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment. The City' s VMT analysis guidelines requires the proposed Project' s VMT per capita to be compared with the jurisdictional VMT per capita to determine VMT impacts.

Basedon the City' sVMT analysisguidelines for residential developmentprojects, the threshold for determining VMT impacts is 15percentbelow the City' scurrent baselineVMT per capitaunder baseline (2012) andcumulative (2040) conditions. Table R: Baseline ( 2012) and Cumulative ( 2040) Jurisdictional and Project VMT per Capita Comparison shows the Project' s VMT underbaseline (2012) andcumulative (2040) conditions comparedto the VMT of the City of Riverside under the same conditions.

As shown in Table R, the Project' sVMT per capita exceedsthe City' sVMT per capita during baseline (2012) and cumulative 2040) conditions by 99 percent and 83 percent, respectively. As such, based on the City' s VMT analysis guidelines, the proposed Project would have a significant VMT impact under both baseline and cumulative conditions. However, in PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration coordination with the City of Riverside staff, mitigation measure strategies were explored to reduce the Project' s impact pertaining to VMT.

Table R: Baseline ( 2012) and Cumulative ( 2040) Jurisdictional and Project VMT per Capita Comparison Analysis Scenario City of Riverside ( miles) Project ( miles) Percentage Difference Baseline ( 2012) 10. 8 21. 5 99%
Cumulative ( 2040) 10. 6 19. 4 83%
Source: LSA, TTM37731 Cole Development Project Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, November 25, 2020.

When a lead agency, under CEQA, identifies a significant impact, the agencymust identify feasible mitigation measuresin order to avoid or substantially reduce such an impact. VMT impacts require mitigation of regional impacts through more behavioral changes. Enforcement of mitigation measuresare subject to the mitigation monitoring requirements of CEQA, as well as the regular police powers of the lead agency (in this case the City of Riverside). These measures can also be incorporated as part of plans, policies, regulations, or project design features. In general, transportation demand management TDM) actions, active transportation amenities, and other measuresto reduce the number of trips creating an impact are possible VMT mitigation strategies.

The City' s baseline and future VMT per capita was compared to the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Mode RIVTAM) and it was determined that the City' s cumulative VMT per capita would be lower compared to the baseline VMT per capita. Lower VMT per capita for the City in the forecast scenario is possible due to multiple factors such asimprovements in land usedensities, mix of land uses, and non -drive alonemode shares. The City' s investment in active transportation projects is one of the contributors toward the decreasein the City' s drive alonemode shareand thus, decreasein the VMT per capita metric. Sincetheproposed Project is consistentwith the City' s GeneralPlan, the Project' s fair -sharecontribution toward these active transportation improvements can be considered as an appropriate VMT mitigation measure.

At present, the City of Riverside doesnot have a mitigation bank where all the GeneralPlan improvements areresearchedand documented; however, City staff has a list of bicycle and pedestrian improvement projects that are anticipated to be completed in the future pursuant to the City of Riverside Active Transportation Master Plan. The total cost of these improvements was calculated and the Project' s fair - share contribution toward these improvements was determined. Based on the total VMT Growth in the City under baseline (2012) and cumulative ( 2040) conditions totaling 2,998,673 miles compared to the proposed Project' s VMT of 3, 605 miles, a Project Fair Share of 0. 12 percent was calculated for the proposed Project. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA - 1 would require the Project applicant to pay their fair share toward the City' s bicycle and pedestrian projects and mitigation bank study to reduce Project impacts associatedwith VMT generation.

Mitigation Measure
TRA - 1: The Project applicant shall pay their Project Fair -Share fee of 0.12 percent of the $ 61,583,924.03 total cost toward the City' s bicycle andpedestrianprojects, which will be usedto develop a Vehicle Miles Traveled mitigation bank study. This fee shall be paid the earlier of one ( 1) year after entitlement approval or prior to issuance of grading permit. The Project Fair -ShareCost equatesto $74,036.10 and shall be paid to the City of Riverside by the Project applicant.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA - 1 would ensure that any potential impacts to Project -related VMT generation would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature ( e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
17d. Response: (Source: Project Plan Set, City of Riverside Zoning Code, General Plan 2025) PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration No Impact. The design of the proposed Project doesnot include any geometric design features or incompatible usesthat could substantially increasehazards. The proposed Project would develop a neighborhood consisting of 41 single-family residential units on varying sized lots, an internal circulation system (neighborhood roads), one common use park, one lot occupied by a water quality management basin, and five lots occupied by slopes. The design of the Project, through review of the Project Plan Set, does not include abnormal development that would increase hazards related to traffic. The internal circulation of the site would be consistent with similar developments in the City and would allow parking ( driveway and on -street) and access for residents. Building setbackswould be consistentwith the developmentstandardsof the PRD and the variance andwould not block line of sight views for vehicles exiting the site onto Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. Implementation of the proposed Project would not substantially increase hazardsdue to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. No direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts would occur with implementation of the Project. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
d. Result in inadequate emergency access? 101
17e. Response: ( Source: Project Plan Set — Project Site Plan; 2019 California Fire Code Sections 503. 1. 1, 503. 2. 1, 506.1, and 503.6; General Plan 2025; City of Riverside Fire Department) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would comply with the 2020 California Fire Code Section 503 -Fire Apparatus Access Roads. Sections 503. 1. 1 Buildings and Facilities; and 503. 2. 1 Dimensions of the 2019 California Fire Code Section would all be followed in development of the proposed Project. During construction, the Project site would remain accessiblefor emergencyvehicles through the on-site dirt roadsthat connectto Lurin Avenue. The Project Site Plan indicates that accessto the Project site, once operational, would be provided via newly constructed on-site roads connecting to Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive. The internal circulation systemwould be designedto a width to accommodate emergency vehicles pursuant to the 2020 California Fire Code requirements and City of Riverside. Prior to Project approval, the Riverside City Fire Department would review the Final Site Plan to ensure adequate emergency accessto the site is provided. If additional features are required, the Project would need to incorporate these as conditions of approval.

Based on the design of the Project as shown on the Project Site Plan, compliance with the applicable 2020 California Fire Code, and review and approval by the Riverside Fire Department, the proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access. Direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public ResourcesCode Section 21074 aseither a site, feature, place, cultural landscapethat is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020. 1( k), or
18a. Response:

Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014 ( i. e., AB 42), requires Lead Agencies evaluate project' s potential to impact " tribal cultural resources." Such resources include "[ s] ites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe that are eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources." AB 52 also gives Lead Agencies the discretion to determine, supported by substantial evidence, whether a resource qualifies as a " tribal cultural resource."
Per AB 52 ( specifically PRC 21080.3.1), Native American consultation is required upon request by a California Native American tribe that haspreviously requestedthat the City provide it with notice of suchprojects. Pursuantto provisions of AB 52, the City contactedthe following Native American Tribes on August 5, 2020:

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation
Morongo Band of Mission Indians
Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians
Rincon Band of Luisefio Indians
Gabrielino- Tongva Tribe ( San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians) San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians
The following California Native American tribes, asshown in Table S: Native American Tribes Consulted, have requested consultation with the City of Riverside pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080.3.1:

Table S: Native American Tribes Consulted
Tribe Consultation Date Consultation Conclusion Date
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians September 14, 2020 May 20, 2021 Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians August 27, 2020 April 12, 2021 Rincon Band of Luisefio Indians August 24, 2020 August 24, 2020 Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians August 21, 2020 April 5, 2021 Source: City of Riverside, April 2021.

Mitigation Measures TRC -1 through TRC -3 were agreedto during City and Tribal consultation and will be applied to the project. Additionally, at the requestof PechangaBand of Luisefio Indians Lot E, located at the northeast area of the project site is identified as a Conservation Easement for the potential reburial of resources if discovered. Mitigation Measure CUL - 1 will be implemented to reduced impacts to archaeological resources if discovered during project construction activities.

CUL -1: Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring: At least30 daysprior to application for a gradingpermit andbefore any grading, excavationand/or ground -disturbing activities take place, the developer/applicant shall retain a Secretaryof PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Interior Standardsqualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

1. The project archaeologist, in consultation with consulting tribes, the Developer, and the City, shall develop an Archaeological Monitoring Plan to addressthe details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeologicaland cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
b. The development of a schedule in coordination with the developer/ applicant and the project archaeologist for designatedNative American Tribal Monitors from the consulting tribes during grading, excavation, and ground -disturbing activities on the site, including the scheduling, safetyrequirements, duties, scopeof work, and Native American Tribal Monitors' authority to stop and redirect grading activities in coordination with all project archaeologists;
c. The protocols and stipulations that the Applicant, tribes, and project archaeologist/ paleontologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits, or nonrenewable paleontological resources that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation; d. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural and paleontological resources, sacred sites, and human remains if discovered on the project site; and
e. The scheduling and timing of the Cultural Sensitivity Training noted in Mitigation Measure TRC -3.

TRC - 1 Prior to grading permit issuance, if there are any changesto project site design and/or proposed grades, the Applicant and the City shall contact consulting tribes to provide an electronic copy of the revised plans for review. Additional consultation shall occur between the City, developer/applicant, and consulting tribes to discussany proposed changes and review any new impacts and/or potential avoidance/preservation of the cultural resources on the project site. The City and the developer/applicant shall make all attempts to avoid and/or preserve in place as many cultural and paleontological resources as possible that are located on the project site if the site design and/ or proposed grades should be revised. In the event of inadvertent discoveries of archaeological resources, work shall temporarily halt until agreementsare executedwith consulting tribe, to provide tribal monitoring for ground disturbing activities.

TRC - 2 Treatment and Disposition of Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this project, the following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries:

1. Consulting Tribes Notified: within 24 hours of discovery, the consulting tribe( s) shall be notified via email and phone. The developershall provide the city evidenceof notification to consulting tribes. Consulting tribe(s) will be allowed accessto the discovery, in order to assistwith the significance evaluation.

2. Temporary Curation and Storage: During the course of construction, all discovered resources shall be temporarily curated in a securelocation on site or at the offices of the project archaeologist. The removal of any artifacts from the project site will needto be thoroughly inventoried with tribal monitor oversight of the process; and

3. Treatment and Final Disposition: The landowner(s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non -human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to cultural resources. The Applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the City of Riverside Community and Economic Development Department with evidence of same:
a. Accommodate the processfor on-site reburial of the discovered items with the consulting Native American tribes or bands. This shall include measuresandprovisions to protect the future reburial areafrom any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed; b. If reburial is not feasible, a curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore will be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/researchersfor further study. The collections and associatedrecords PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the feesnecessary for permanent curation; and c. At the completion of grading, excavation, and ground -disturbing activities on the site, a PhaseIV Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the City documenting monitoring activities conducted by the project archaeologist and Native Tribal Monitors within 60 days of completion of grading. This report shall document the impacts to the known resources on the property; describe how each mitigation measure was fulfilled; document the type of cultural resources recovered and the disposition of such resources; provide evidence of the required cultural sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the required pre - grade meeting; and, in a confidential appendix, include the daily/ weekly monitoring notes from the archaeologist. All reports produced will be submitted to the City of Riverside, EasternInformation Center, and interested tribes.

TRC -3: Cultural Sensitivity Training: The Secretary of Interior Standards County certified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall attend the pre -grading meeting with the developer/permit holder' s contractors to provide Cultural Sensitivity Training for all construction personnel. This shall include the proceduresto be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areasand protocols that apply in the event that unanticipated resourcesare discovered.

Only construction personnel who have received this training can conduct construction and disturbance activities in sensitive areas. A sign -in sheetfor attendeesof this training shall be included in the PhaseIV Monitoring Report.

With implementation of Mitigation Measures TRC - 1 through TRC - 3 and CUL - 1, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant.
b. A resourcedeterminedby the lead agency, in its discretion and supportedby substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision ( c) of Public ResourcesCode Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision ( c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
18b. Response:

Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. CEQA defines a " historical resource" as a resource that meets one or more of the following criteria: ( 1) is listed in, or determined eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources ( California Register); ( 2) is listed in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC § 5020. 1(k); ( 3) is identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of PRC §5024.1(g); or (4) is determined to be a historical resourceby aproject' s Lead Agency (PRC §21084.1 and State CEQA Guidelines §15064.5[a]).

A resource may be listed as a historical resourcein the California Register if it meetsany of the following National Register of Historic Places criteria as defined in PRC § 5024. 1(C):

A. Is associatedwith eventsthat have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California' s history and cultural heritage.

B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past.

C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possess high artistic values.

D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

A " substantial adverse change" to a historical resource, according to PRC § 5020. 1(q), " means demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired." As detailed in response to Checklist Question 5b, a project - specific cultural resources assessment was conducted for the project site and included archaeological and historical records search, communication with Native American tribal representatives, PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and an intensive pedestrian survey of the project site. The records search revealed 34 cultural resources were previously recordedwithin onemile of the Project site including archaeological (prehistoric bedrock milling slicks andprehistoric bedrock milling stations) and built environment resources. The nearest prehistoric resource is a bedrock milling feature ( 33- 013836/CA- RIV- 007563) is approximately 250 feet eastof the Project site. No archaeological resources were discovered on the proposed Project site.

Despite the negative testing results, due to poor surface visibility encountered during the survey, the presenceof a prehistoric resource within the Project area and more than 34 others within a mile, there is some potential for both surface and subsurface resourcesto be discovered. Mitigation Measure CUL -1 will be implemented to ensure archaeological surveying will be conducted during construction and resourcesthat are discovered will be vetted through consulting Native American Tribes.

Standardcondition of approval for Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remainswill be implemented in the event humanremains are discovered during Project construction and they are identified aspotential Native American remains.

With the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL -1 and the standardcondition of approval for Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains, impacts to tribal cultural resources determined significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision ( c) of PRC Section 5024. 1 with Native American input would be reduced to less than significant levels.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

19. UTILITIES AND SYSTEM SERVICES
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
X
19a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025 Table PF - 1 — RPU Projected Domestic Water Supply ( AC- FT/ YR), Table PF - 2 — RPU Projected Water Demand, Table PF - 3 — Western Municipal Water District Projected Domestic Water Supply ( AC- FT/ YR), RPU, FPEIR Table 5.16-G — General Plan Projected Water Demand for RPU Including Water Reliability for 2025, Table 5.16-1 - Current and Projected Water Use WMWD, Table 5.16-J - General Plan Projected Water Demand for WMWD Including Water Reliability 2025, Table 5.16-K - Estimated Future Wastewater Generation for the City of Riverside' s Sewer Service Area & Table 5. 16- L - Estimated Future Wastewater Generation for the Planning Area Served by WMWD, Figure 5.16-4 — Water Facilities and Figure

5. 16- 6 — Sewer Infrastructure and Wastewater Integrated Master Plan and Certified EIR; Southeast corner of Lurin and Obsidian Tentative Tract Map 33481, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, 6/29/19, Appendix F)
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site Plans prepared by the applicant indicate that the Western Municipal Water District provides water and sewer service in the vicinity of the site. Electricity and natural gas is provided by Southern California Edison and SoCal Gas, respectively.

Water: A 12 -inch water line exists in the westbound lanes of Lurin Avenue and an 8 -inch and 10 -inch water line exist in the eastboundlanes of Lurin Avenue. The proposed Project would connect to theseexisting water lines in order to provide both potable water to the Project residentsand for Project landscaping. Water distribution lines would be installed andloop through the Project site in order to provide water supply to each of the single-family residential units. Water for landscape irrigation would be separately metered. The necessary on-site water distribution line installation is included as a design feature of the Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond what is analyzed in this environmental document.

Off- site improvements to water lines located in the surrounding streets would not be required as the piping is correctly sized to continue to provide adequatewater delivery to the Project site. As a condition of approval, the Project applicant would require awill -serveletter from Western Municipal Water District verifying that the Project would be adequatelyservedby the district, prior to final map approval. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new water infrastructure that would cause significant environmental effects. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Wastewater: The Project site is currently servedby an existing 8 -inch sewerline in the westbound lanesof Lurin Avenue.

The proposed Project would include an internal wastewater distribution system connecting the on-site uses to the existing infrastructure in Lurin Avenue. From here, wastewater would be conveyed to either the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority ( WRCRWA) wastewater treatment facility or March Air Reserve Base wastewater treatment facility.

The two wastewater treatment plants have a combined capacity of 8.75 million gallons per day (mgd) with the WRCRWA treatment plant designedto have a capacity for 8 mgd. The WRCRWA recently expandedits designcapacity up to 14 mgd; as such, both plants currently have a daily intake capacity of 14.75 mgd.

According to the Riverside 2014 Capital Improvement Program and Rate Development Study, the adjusted daily flow of wastewater per equivalent dwelling unit in the City is 206 gallons per day. The proposed Project would include the development of 41 single-family residential units and therefore is estimated to generated 8,446 mgd of wastewater that would be conveyed and treated at the WRCRWA or March Air Reserve Base. Based on the existing daily treatment capacity and inflow of both plants, the Project would be adequately servedpertaining to wastewater disposal and conveyance. As part of the Project design, an internal wastewater distribution system would be developed on site; however, such installation would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those that are analyzed in this environmental document. As part of the Project' s conditions of approval, the applicant would be required to provide sewer -loading calculations to the City to ensure the existing piping is correctly sized to continue to provide adequateservice to the Project site. Any required improvements to PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration the existing piping would occur within City right- of-way or on properties that have already been developed, so no additional physical impacts to the environment are expected. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

Storm Water: The Project site is currently served by existing storm water drain lines in Lurin Avenue. On-site storm water drainage infrastructure would be developed as part of the Project design in conformance with the Final WQMP Report that will be prepared for the Project. The on-site storm water drainage facilities will connect to existing storm water infrastructure in the City' s right-of-way. A WQMP basin and detentionbasin (totaling 12,916 squarefeet) will be developedon the Project site within Lot D ( southeast corner of the site). Off- site storm water drainage facilities would not need to be upgraded with implementation of the proposed Project as existing off- site infrastructure has enough capacity to accommodate development on the Project site. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new off- site wastewater infrastructure that would cause significant environmental effects. Impacts will be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Electrical/ Gas Utilities: The proposed Project would tie into existing electrical and natural gas infrastructure that exists in roads adjacent to the site. Such connectionsmay require trenching on the adjacent roads; however, construction to connect to existing electrical and natural gasinfrastructure would be temporary. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require the relocation or construction of new electrical/ natural gas infrastructure off site that would cause significant environmental effects. The Project site is occupied by a few utility poles, all of which will be relocated with the input of the various utility providers. Impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required.

Telecommunications: The proposed Project would tie into existing telecommunication infrastructure that exists in roads adjacent to the site. Suchconnections may require trenching on the adjacent roads; however, construction to connect to existing telecommunication infrastructure would be temporary. Implementation of the proposed Project would not require the relocation or construction of new telecommunication infrastructure off site that would cause significant environmental effects.

Impacts will be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
19b. Response: ( Source: Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Table 7-3:

Retail Supply and Demand Comparisonfor a Normal Year; Table 7-4: WholesaleSupply and Demand Comparison for a Normal Year; Table 7-5: Retail Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-6: Wholesale Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-7Retail Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple - Dry Years; Table 7- 8: Wholesale Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple - Dry Years, pgs. 7-5 through 7-7) Less Than Significant Impact. Although the proposed Project is located within the City of Riverside, the WMWD provides water to the Project site. The WMWD would have sufficient water supplies available to adequately serve the Project during normal, dry, and multiple dry year scenarios. The proposed Project would connect to existing water infrastructure to provide the necessary construction and operational water needs of site occupants. The connection point for water lines would be from infrastructure within the Lurin Avenue right- of-way. The WMWD 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update ( UWMP) estimates water supply and demand during normal, dry, and multiple -dry years as shown in Table T: WMWD Projected Water Supply/ Demand ( acre- feet/year).

The WMWD' s 2015 Urban Water ManagementPlan estimateda daily per capitawater demandof 352 gallons per capitaper day.' Implementation of the proposedProject would result in amaximum population of 117residents (2.86persons/householdx 41 units), with an estimatedwaterusageof 41,536 gallonsper day (0.13acre-feet/day) or 15,160,640 gallonsper year (46.5 acre- feet/year). This represents0.07 percentof anticipatedWMWD' sretail water suppliesin 2020 (69,718 acre-feet assumingworst- casemultiple dry years), a 0.05 percentof anticipatedWMWD' sretail water suppliesin 2040 (90,400 acre-feet assumingworst- casemultiple dry years), a 0.03 percentof anticipatedWMWD' s wholesalewater suppliesin 2020 (152,491 acre-feet assuming 6 Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Section 5. 1 Update of Targets from 2010 UWMP, Table 5- 1 Revised SBX7- 7 Water Use Targets, page 5- 2, June 2016.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration worst-casemultiple dry years), anda0.025 percentof anticipatedWMWD' swholesalewater suppliesin 2040 (184,095 acre-feet assuming worst-casemultiple dry years). As shown in Table T, sufficient water supplies are available to serveexisting and projected future water demand under normal, dry, and multiple -dry conditions.

Table T: Riverside Projected Water Supply/ Demand ( acre- feet/year) Years
Normal Year Dry Year Multiple - Dry Year
Supply Demand Supply Demand Supply Demand
Retail
2020 69, 718 30, 814 69, 718 30, 814 69, 718 30, 814
2025 76, 264 33, 714 76, 264 33, 714 76, 264 33, 714
2030 79, 672 36, 415 79, 672 36, 415 79, 672 36, 415
2035 92, 030 39, 170 92, 030 39, 170 92, 030 39, 170
2040 90, 400 41, 704 90, 400 41, 704 90, 400 41, 704
Wholesale
2020 152, 491 110, 787 152, 491 110, 787 152, 491 110, 787 2025 159, 389 114, 039 159, 389 114, 039 159, 389 114, 039 2030 169, 372 123, 515 169, 372 123, 515 169, 372 123, 515 2035 178, 155 122, 895 178, 155 122, 895 178, 155 122, 895 2040 184, 095 132, 999 184, 095 132, 999 184, 095 132, 999 Source: Western Municipal Water District, 2015 Urban WaterManagement Plan Update, Table 7-3: Retail Supply andDemand Comparison for aNormal Year; Table 7-4: Wholesale Supply and Demand Comparison for a Normal Year; Table 7-5: Retail Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-6:

Wholesale Supply and Demand in a Single -Dry Year; Table 7-7 Retail Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple -Dry Years; Table 7-8: Wholesale Supply and Demand Comparison in Multiple - Dry Years, pgs. 7-5 through 7-7.

Therefore, the proposed Project was found to have a less than significant impact on water supplies either directly, indirectly, or cumulatively during normal, dry, and multiple -dry years. No mitigation is required. c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequatecapacity to servethe project' sprojected demandin addition to the provider' s existing commitments?
0 19c. Response: ( Source: FPEIR Figure 5. 16- 5 - Sewer Service Areas, Figure 5. 16- 6 - Sewer Infrastructure, Table 5. 16- L - Estimated Future WastewaterGenerationfor the Planning Area Servedby WMWD, and WastewaterIntegrated Master Plan and Certified EIR)
Less Than Significant Impact. Table 5.16-L of the City of Riverside General Plan FPEIR shows that the future flow per capitaof wastewater (2025) would be 96.6gallonsper day. Table5.16-L indicatesthat theWMWD PlanningArea' spopulation would be 35, 841 residents with maximum buildout and Planned Residential Development. The Project' s population estimate has been included in this population buildout in the area served by WMWD. As of 2014, the WRCRWA had a daily intake capacity of 14 mgd. In its General Plan analysis, the City evaluated utility demandsbased on three levels of development ranging from typical growth to the most extreme growth ( Typical, Maximum, and Maximum with PRD). According to the General Plan 2025 FPEIR, the WMWD WRCRWA would adequately serve the City under a Typical Growth Scenario, Maximum Growth Scenario, and Maximum w/ PRD Scenario through 2025.

With an estimated increase in the City' s population by approximately 117 persons, the proposed Project would generate approximately 11,398.8 gallons of wastewater per day or 4,160,562 gallons of wastewater per year. Given the plant' s maximum treatment capacity of 14 million gallons per day and a planned expansion of the facility to increase capacity to 32 PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration million gallons per day, the Project would only incrementally increasethe demandfor wastewatertreatment by approximately

0. 03 percent ( 11, 398. 8/ 32, 000, 000).

The proposed Project would connect to the existing municipal water and sewer system via on-site water and sewer lines to be constructed to interconnect to existing lines. The proposed population increase as a result of the proposed Project would not be considered substantial. As a result, the proposed Project would not induce a population increase above that which has been planned for by the City, and the proposed Project would remain consistent with the Typical Growth Scenario of the General Plan 2025 where future wastewatertreatment capacity was determined to be adequate (seeTable 5.16-L of the Riverside General Plan 2025 FPEIR).

The project would not exceed RWQCB wastewater treatment requirements. The Project is consistent with the General Plan 2025 Typical Growth Scenario where future wastewater generation was determined to be adequate ( see Table 5. 16- L of the General Plan 2025 Final PEIR). Further, the current Wastewater Treatment Master Plan anticipates and provides for this type of project. For thesereasons, Project impactswould be lessthan significant directly, indirectly, or cumulatively. No mitigation is required.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excessof the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
19d. Response: ( Source: FPEIR Table 5. 16- A — Existing Landfills and Table 5.16-M — Estimated Future Solid Waste Generation from the Planning Area)
Less Than Significant Impact. Solid waste generated during construction and operation of the proposed Project would be disposed of at the Badlands Landfill, located at 31125 Ironwood Avenue in Moreno Valley. The Badlands Landfill operates Monday through Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and accepts the following types of waste: agricultural, asbestos, ash, construction/ demolition, contaminated soil, dead animals, green materials, industrial waste, inert waste, liquid waste, metals, mixed municipal, sludge (bio solids), tires, and wood waste. Riverside County, in April 2019, circulated a Notice of Intent to adopt an IS/MND for the Badlands Landfill Integrated Project; aproject to revise the landfill' s Solid Waste Facility Permit to expand operations and capacity. The revised permit would increase the permitted disturbance area of the landfill from 278 acresto 811 acres, which includes expandingthe disposal footprint from 150acresto 396 acres, thereby providing anadditional 50 yearsof neededlandfill capacity. The permit would increasethe maximum permitted daily tonnageby 500 tons per day, from 4,500 tons per day to 5,000 tons per day. The maximum design capacity of the landfill will increasefrom 34 4 million cubic yards to 86 million tons (cubic yards not stated), resulting in a new closure date of 2073.' In its General Plan analysis, the City evaluated solid waste generation and disposal based on three levels of development ranging from typical growth to the most extreme growth ( Typical, Maximum, and Maximum with PRD). According to the General Plan 2025 FPEIR, the estimated solid waste generation in 2025 under the Maximum with PRD Scenario would be 2,579 tons/day. Construction activities on the Project site would require the demolition of an unoccupied outbuilding and concrete foundations. The demolition debris would be transported off site and disposedof at Badlands Landfill. According to Table 5.16-M of the General Plan 2025 FPEIR, single-family residential units have a solid waste generation factor of 10 pounds per day per dwelling units. Based on this solid waste generation rate, the proposed Project, once operational, is estimatedto generatea maximumof 410 poundsper day (0.21 ton per day),8which is well belowthe maximumpermitted daily tonnage acceptedby the Badlands Landfill.

Perthe California GreenBuilding Code, a minimum of 50 percentof debriswould be diverted to a material recycling facility thus reducing the input of solid waste to Badlands Landfill emanating from the proposed Project. Direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to landfill capacity will be less than significant with implementation of the proposed Project. No mitigation is required.
7 CEQAnet Web Portal, EA No. 2017- 03: Badlands Landfill Integrated Project Notice of Completion, https:// ceganet. opr. ca. gov/ 2019049142/2 (accessedJuly 9, 2019). 8
Solid Waste Estimate 10 lbs/day per dwelling unit for single-family residential units x 40 dwelling units = 400 lbs/day or 0.2 ton/day.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration e. Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 19e. Response: (Source: California Integrated WasteManagement Board 2002 Landfill Facility Compliance Study) No Impact. The California Integrated Waste Management Act under the Public Resource Code requires that local jurisdictions divert at least 50 percent of all solid wastegeneratedby January 1, 2000. The City is currently achieving a 60 percent diversion rate, well above Staterequirements. In addition, the California GreenBuilding Code requires all developmentsto divert 50 percentof non -hazardousconstructionanddemolition debris for all projects and 100percentof excavatedsoil andlandclearing debris for all non-residential projects beginning January 1, 2011. The proposed Project must comply with the City' s waste disposal requirements aswell asthe California Green Building Code and, as such, would not conflict with any federal, State, or local regulations related to solid waste. Therefore, no impact related to solid waste statuteswould occur directly, indirectly, or cumulatively with Project implementation. No mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

20. WILDFIRE
If located in or near StateResponsibility Areas or lands classified asvery high fire hazard severit zones, would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency responseplan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
20a. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025; Project Set Plans; Riverside Municipal Code Section 9. 20. 130 and Section

19.100; CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Program) Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in a semi -urbanized portion of Riverside and is not located within a Local ResponsibilityArea (LRA) Very High or High Fire HazardSeverityZonenor is it locatedwithin a StateResponsibilityArea (SRA) Very High orHigh FireHazardSeverityZone, asdefinedby CAL FIRE andtheFireHazardSeverityZoneMapprograms. TheProject site is approximately0.29 mile from the closestSRA High Fire Hazard SeverityZone and 1.42 miles from the closestSRA Very High FireHazardSeverityZone. TheclosestLRA Very High FireHazardSeverityZoneis approximately1.09milesnorthwestof theProject site.

The Project site is currently vacant (except for a foundation from a single-family residential unit) and is currently accessedby existing dirt roadsoff Lurin Avenue. Implementation of the proposedProject would not require constructionactivities on the off- site roadway systemand therefore would not impair the City' s adoptedemergencyresponseplan or emergencyevacuation plan.

Design of the Project would include the development an internal circulation system ( residential streets) that would connect to Lurin Avenue and Obsidian Drive.

The designof the Project will comply with the Section 19.780.060 of the Riverside Municipal Coderelated to the development standardsfor a PlannedResidential Development (PRD) use. Prior to the issuanceof the final building permits, the City would review site plans for the proposed Project to ensurethat design featureswould not substantially impair emergencyresponseor emergencyevacuationplans of the City. Direct, indirect, and cumulative project impacts would be lessthan significant and no mitigation is required.
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
20b. Response: (Source: CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Program) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project site is located in a semi - urbanized portion of Riverside within an LRA, and is categorized as LRA Non- Wildland/ Non-Urban and High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, as defined by CAL FIRE and the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map program. The proposed Project site is topographically flat and, basedon weather conditions, can be exposed to offshore ( Santa Ana Winds) or onshore winds, similar to other portions of Riverside. If wildfires occur nearby, thereis potential for smoketo drift into the City andincreasepollutant concentrationsfor the residentsat the proposed Project site as well as residents in the City. Such conditions would most likely be temporary as fires that produce the smoke are controlled and extinguished. Due to the location of the proposed Project site in a semi - urbanized area, the exposure of Project occupants to uncontrolled spread of a wildfire is high. The City of Riverside has systems in place to protect residents in the event that wildfires areburning outside of the City limits and spreadingtoward the City.

Implementation of the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks, exposing Project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Direct, indirect, and cumulative Project impacts would be less than significant with implementation of the proposed Project. No mitigation is required. c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure ( such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 20c. Response: ( Riverside Municipal Code Section 19. 100; Project Set Plans) No Impact. The proposed Project includes the development of 41 single-family residential units, a park, and an internal circulation system ( residential streets), on approximately 10.06 acres of land. The Project would be served by existing infrastructure ( roads, natural gas, sewage, electrical and water utilities) and would directly connect to existing utilities already serving the site. The proposedProject would not include the development of infrastructure (roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, etc.) that may exacerbatefire risk or causetemporary or ongoing impacts to the environment.

Prior to the issuanceof the final building permit, the City would review site plans for the proposedProject to ensurethat design features would not exacerbate fire risk. The proposed Project is not anticipated to install or require the maintenance of infrastructure that would exacerbatefire risk; assuch, no impact, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively would occur. No mitigation is required. d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainagechanges? 20d. Response: ( Source: General Plan 2025, Federal Emergency Management Administration Flood Map Service Center, https:// msc.fema. gov/portal/ search#searchresultsanchor; California Department of Water Resources Division of Safety of Dams California Dam Break Inundation Maps https://fmds. water.ca.gov/maps/damim/ No Impact. The proposed Project is located on a site that is topographically flat ( gradual maximum elevation changeson the site of about 30 feet) and is surroundedby land that is topographically flat. A residential neighborhoodis locatednorth of the Project site, andlarge lot single family residential usesare locatedwest and south of the site. Areas to the west of the site are vacant; however, the land eastof the Project site is being prepared for development. The closest elevated terrain is the Temescal Mountains ( approximately 13 miles southwest of the site); as a result, future residents and the structures on the proposed Project site would most likely not be exposed to significant risks from downslope flooding, landslides, or drainage changes due to wildland fires. The proposed Project site is located in Federal Emergency Management Agency Zone D Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard. The closestFlood Hazard areais Cajalco Creek, which is approximately 3.5 miles southwestof the site.

The Project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or an endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
X
21a. Response
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed Project' s impacts to biological and cultural resources were analyzed in this Initial Study and all direct and cumulative impacts were determined to have no impact, a less than significant impact, or rendered a less than significant impact with implementation of mitigation. Therefore, impacts to biological and cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated and no additional mitigation is required.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (" Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
0 21b. Response
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The expected growth associated with the proposed Project has been previously analyzed under the 2025 General Plan EIR. The 2025 General Plan EIR took into consideration the cumulative impact of buildout of the City ( which included development of the Project site under its current land use designation and zoning designation) and determined that cumulative impacts with buildout of the City would be less than significant. The proposed Project, throughout this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, has considered all impacts on a project -level analysis. Where impacts were determined to occur, the proposed Project would implement mitigation measures, which would reduce impacts on a project -level basis and would ensure the proposed Project does not cumulatively contribute to impacts discussed under the 2025 General Plan EIR. All cumulative impacts related to these resource topics were less than significant or rendered less than significant with mitigation incorporated. c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantialadverseeffects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
21c. Response
Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Impacts related to aesthetics, air quality, geology and soils, GHGs, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, traffic, utilities andservices, andwildfires that could potentially affect humanbeingsdirectly or indirectly were analyzed in this Initial Study. All direct and cumulative impacts were less than significant or rendered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration

CITY OF
I IVEIk$ IDE

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program hasbeenprepared for use in implementing mitigation for the:

Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 — Obsidian Development Project The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Initial Study prepared for the project by the City of Riverside.

CEQA requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment ( Public Resource Code Section 21081.6). The law states that the reporting or monitoring program would be designedto ensurecompliance during project implementation.

The monitoring program contains the following elements:
1) The mitigation measuresare recorded with the action and procedure necessaryto ensurecompliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several mitigation measures. 2) A procedure for compliance and verification hasbeen outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designateswho would take action, what action would be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance would be reported. 3) The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessarybased upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. As changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records would be developed and incorporated into the program.

This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program includes mitigation identified in the Initial Study.

PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
Biological Resources
BIO-1conservation
Prior to the commencement of grading activities, the applicant shall make the appropriate mitigation fee payment into the MSHCP Stephens' kangaroo rat fee payment program for
of Stephens' kangaroo rat - occupied habitats in order
to offset the loss of potentially suitable Stephens' kangaroo rat habitat on site through project implementation.

Prior to grading
activities
Confirmation of
Payment of
Mitigation Fees
City of Riverside
BIO - 2
Prior to on- site vegetation clearance, the Project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre -construction nesting bird survey in accordancewith the following:

The survey shall be conductedno more than three days
prior to the initiation of clearance/ construction work.

If pre - construction surveys indicate that bird nests are not present or are inactive, or if potential habitat is unoccupied, no further mitigation is required.

If active nestsof birds are found during the surveys, a species- specific no -disturbance buffer zone shall be
establishedby a qualified biologist around active nests until said qualified biologist determinesthat all young have fledged ( i. e., are no longer reliant upon the nest).

It is recommended that close coordination between the
developer of the site, the City of Riverside, the project engineer, and the consulting qualified biologist to
consider vegetation clearance outside of the normal bird nesting season (usually February 15through September
15) to avoid impactsto nestingbirds that would
potentially violate the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It
should be noted that bird nesting seasonis increasingly less definitive for some year- round resident species, such ashummingbirds and raptors. Further, ground -dwelling
birds such asburrowing owls, can be affected nearly any time of the year if present. It is therefore advisable to conduct a pre -constructionbird surveyno matter the
time of year.

Removal of vegetation necessitates installation of
appropriate Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWPPP) measures, particularly if grading is not
Prior to
vegetation
clearance on
site
Survey subnuttal
to City City of Riverside
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
undertaken immediately; therefore, careful timing of the project schedule and implementation measures is
necessaryto avoid water quality impacts.

BIO - 3
The Project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a 30 -daypre -construction survey for burrowing owl. The results of the single one -day survey shall be submitted to the City prior to obtaining a grading permit. If burrowing owl arenot detected during the pre -construction survey, no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owl are detectedduring the pre -construction survey, the Project applicant and a qualified consulting biologist will be required to prepare and submit for approval a burrowing owl - relocation program.

Prior to
construction
activity
commencement
Submittal and
Approval of
Survey
City of Riverside
BIO - 4
In accordancewith MSHCP provisions limiting the use of exotic and invasive plant species, the Project' s landscape plan shall exclude invasive species such as, but not limited to crimson fountain grass ( Pennisetum setaceum), pampas grass ( Cortaderia selloana), giant reed ( Arundo donax), tree of heaven ( Ailanthus altissima), Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), and other ornamental landscapeelements on the list of exotic invasive plants utilized by the Riverside Conservation Authority that have the potential to spreadinto adjoining, downstream, or nearby areas.

Post-
construction
activities
Approval of
Landscaping
Plan
City of Riverside
Cultural Resources
CUL - 1
Archaeological Monitoring. At least 30 days prior to application for a grading permit andbefore any grading, excavation, and/or ground -disturbing activities take place, the developer/applicant shall retain a Secretaryof Interior Standards -qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify anyunknown archaeologicalresources.

1. The project archaeologist, in consultation with consulting tribes, the Developer, and the City, shall develop an
Archaeological Monitoring Plan to addressthe details,
timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
Thirty days
prior to grading
and during
grading activity.

Monitoring by
Archaeologist
and reporting.

City of Riverside
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
b. The development of a rotating or simultaneous
schedule in coordination with the developer/ applicant
and the project archaeologist for designated Native
American Tribal Monitors from the consulting tribes
during grading, excavation, and ground -disturbing
activities on the site, including the scheduling, safety requirements, duties, scope of work, and Native
American Tribal Monitors' authority to stop and
redirect grading activities in coordination with all
project archaeologists;
c. The protocols and stipulations that the Applicant,
tribes, and project archaeologist/ paleontologist will
follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources
discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural
resource deposits, on nonrenewable paleontological
resources that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation;
d. Treatmentand final disposition of any cultural and
paleontological resources, sacred sites, and human
remains if discovered on the project site; and
e. The scheduling and timing of the Cultural Sensitivity Training noted in Mitigation Measure TRC -3.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
HAZ- 1
Prior to issuanceof a grading permit, a soil survey conductedby a licensed professional (retained by the applicant and approved by the City) to determine levels of pesticides and or heavy metals shall be conducted on the site. If pesticide or heavy metal levels are not found on the Project site ( or are found below the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) threshold limits for human exposure), then no additional mitigation is required.

However, if pesticide or heavy metal levels exceedingthe EPA threshold limits for human exposure are found on site, then Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 would be required.

Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit.

Soil Survey
Submittal to City City of Riverside
HAZ- 2
If the soil surveydeterminesthat pesticide or heavymetal levels are found on the Project site that exceed the EPA threshold limits for human exposure, a report of the findings and a Removal Action Plan (RAW) shall be prepared by a qualified licensed professional retained by the applicant and approved by the City) and submitted Prior to
Issuance of
Grading Permit.

Removal of
Contaminated
Soil from the
Site.

DTSC
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
to the California Depailtnent of Toxic Substances ( DTSC) or other appropriateagencyfor review and approval. The report shall outline the proceduresfor removing contaminatedsoils from the Project site down to the level of contamination and for off- site disposal by a licensed contractor at a facility that acceptssuch contaminated soil. Soil shall not be reused on the Project site and new soil shall be imported from off site and usedon the site during Project construction. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the DTSC and the City of Riverside Community Development Director or designee, and/or Building and Safety Division or designee.

Transportation
TRA - 1
The Project applicant shall pay their Project Fair -Sharefee of

0.12 percent of the $61,583,924.03 total cost toward the City' s bicycle and pedestrianprojects, which will be usedto develop a Vehicle Miles Traveledmitigation bank study. This fee shall be paid the earlier of one ( 1) year after entitlement approval or prior to issuanceof grading permit. The Project Fair -ShareCost equates to $74,036.10 and shall be paid to the City of Riverside by the Project applicant.

The earlier of
one ( 1) year
after entitlement
approval or
prior to
issuance of
grading permit
Payment of Fair -
ShareFee to City City of Riverside
Tribal Cultural Resources
CUL - 1
Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring: At least 30 daysprior to application for a grading permit andbefore any grading, excavation and/or ground -disturbing activities takeplace, the developer/applicant shall retain a Secretaryof Interior Standards qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground - disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.

1. The project archaeologist, in consultationwith consulting tribes, the Developer, and the City, shall develop an
Archaeological Monitoring Plan to addressthe details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. Details in the plan shall include:
a. Project grading anddevelopmentscheduling;
Thirty day prior
to grading and
during grading
activity.

Monitoring by
Archaeologist
and reporting.

City of Riverside
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
b. The development of a rotating or simultaneous schedule in coordination with the developer/ applicant and the
project archaeologist for designated Native American
Tribal Monitors from the consulting tribes during
grading, excavation, and ground -disturbing activities on the site, including the scheduling, safety requirements, duties, scope of work, and Native American Tribal
Monitors' authority to stop andredirect grading activities in coordination with all project archaeologists;
c. The protocols and stipulations that the Applicant, tribes, and project archaeologist/ paleontologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource
deposits, on nonrenewable paleontological resources that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation;
d. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural and
paleontological resources, sacred sites, and human
remains if discovered on the project site; and
e. The scheduling andtiming of the Cultural Sensitivity Training noted in Mitigation MeasureTRC -3.

TRC - 1
Prior to grading permit issuance, if there areany changesto project site design and/or proposed grades, the Applicant andthe City shall contact consulting tribes to provide an electronic copy of the revised plans for review. Additional consultation shall occur betweenthe City, developer/applicant, and consulting tribes to discussany proposedchangesandreview any new impacts and/or potential avoidance/ preservation of the cultural resources on the project site. The City and the
attempts to avoid and/ or
preservedeveloper/
applicant
placeas
manshall
y ccultural a
e all
paleontological resources as possible that are located on the project site if the site design and/ or proposed grades should be revised. In the event of inadvertent discoveries of archaeological resources, work shall temporarily halt until agreementsareexecutedwith consulting tribe, to provide tribal monitoring for ground disturbing activities.
prior to grading
permit issuance.

Contact
consulting tribe. City of Riverside
TRC - 2
Treatment and Disposition of Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discoveredduring the courseof grading for this project, the During
construction
Treatment and
Final Disposition
City of Riverside
and Consulting
Tribe
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
following procedures will be carried out for treatment and of resources if disposition of the discoveries: discovered

1. Consulting Tribes Notified: within 24 hours of discovery, the consulting tribe(s) shall be notified via email and phone.

The developer shall provide the city evidenceof notification to consulting tribes. Consulting tribe(s) will be allowed access to the discovery, in order to assistwith the significance evaluation.

2. Temporary Curation and Storage: During the course of construction, all discoveredresourcesshall be temporarily curated in a secure location on site or at the offices of the project archaeologist. The removal of any artifacts from the project site will needto be thoroughly inventoried with tribal monitor oversight of the process; and

3. Treatment and Final Disposition: The landowner( s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and non - human remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to cultural resources. The Applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the City of Riverside Community and Economic Development Department with evidence of same:
a. Accommodate the process for on- site reburial of the discovereditems with the consultingNative American
tribes or bands. This shall include measures and
provisions to protect the future reburial areafrom any
future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all
cataloguing andbasicrecordation havebeen completed;
b. If reburial is not feasible, a curation agreement with an appropriatequalified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and
therefore will be professionally curated andmade
available to other archaeologists/ researchers for further study. The collections andassociatedrecordsshall be
transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompaniedby
payment of the feesnecessary
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Tentative Tract Map No. 37733 -Obsidian Development Project Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration: Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Timing/
Frequency
Action
Indicating
Compliance
Monitoring
Agency
Verification of Compliance
Initials Date Remarks
c. At the completion of grading, excavation, and ground - disturbing activities on the site, a PhaseIV Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the City documenting
monitoring activities conducted by the project
archaeologist and Native Tribal Monitors within 60 days of completion of grading. This report shall documentthe impactsto the known resourceson the property; describe
how each mitigation measure was fulfilled; document the type of cultural resources recovered and the disposition of such resources; provide evidence of the required
cultural sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the required pre -grademeeting; and, in a
confidential appendix, include the daily/weekly
monitoring notesfrom the archaeologist. All reports
produced will be submitted to the City of Riverside,
Eastern Information Center, and interested tribes.

TRC - 3
Cultural Sensitivity Training: The Secretary of Interior Standards County certified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall attend the pre -grading meeting with the developer/ permit holder' s contractorsto provide Cultural Sensitivity Training for all construction personnel. This shall include the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areasand protocols that apply in the eventthat unanticipatedresourcesare discovered. Only construction personnel who have received this training can conduct construction and disturbanceactivities in sensitiveareas. A sign -in sheetfor attendeesof this training shall be included in the PhaseIV Monitoring Report.

Prior to Grading
Activities
Completion of
Cultural
Sensitivity
Training
City of Riverside
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix A:

Project Plan Sets
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix B:

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix C:

MSHCP Consistency Analysis and General Biological Assessment Step I Habitat Assessment, Step II, Part A Focused Burrow Survey and Step II, Part B Focused Burrowing Owl Survey
Burrowing Owl Update Report
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix D:

Cultural Resource Assessment
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix E:

Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix F:

Preliminary Hydrology Report
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix G:

Water Quality Management Plan Report
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix H:

Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix I:

Trip Generation Memorandum
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix J:

VMT Memorandum
PR - 2020- 000733 ( TM, PRD, VR, DR) Exhibit 9 - Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration 07/ 09/ 2021
1*,

CITY OF

FUVEIZSIDE

OBSIDIAN PLANNED RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT
PR -2020- 00733 ( Tract Map No. 37733, Planned Residential Development, Variance, and Design Review)
Community & Economic Development Department
Planning Commission
Agenda Item: 5
July 22, 2021
RiversideCA. gov
17- 1

LOCATION MAP
2 RIVERSIDE
2 RiversideCA. gov
1 07/ 09/ 2021
ZONING AND SPECIFIC PLAN MAPT1 1 1
Project Site
OSP- RA- SP - Orangecrest Specific Plan -
Residen ial Agriculture Zone
R-1-10500SP
LEMOONWO_OD rr
R_ 1_10500
SP
III
R- 1-. 13000
i .ISPIf
I
R- 1- 10500
SP

MCDOWELL RD
KEY
Rl led site
Specific Plan
CIRC
P Designation
0oOSP- RA Sec2" Re dlioRsadennolAwiculture
R- 1-- nole- Eomyn inl
R- 1 - Single -Family ',Men.

Q R -I Iosco amEV Residential
0 R -I I3acoSingle -FamilyResider.,
R -1- I/ 2 Acre- sirgleiamR/ ReLdentid
0 PEReadeninlFatale

OSP-RASP
LURIN AV•.:..•..•
R- 1- 13000

OSP-RASP

ARI OSA AN
R- - 1/ 2 acre
SP

DOVING LN
R- 1- 13000
SP

NEWS ME RD
11111111
C ' lioUNDARY
3 RIVERSIDE RiversideCA. gov
3 EXISTING SITE PHOTOS
NORTH
4 RIVERSIDE
4 RiversideCA. gov
2 07/ 09/ 2021

RIVERSIDE

TENTATIVE TRACT MAPLURIN AVENUE
NORTH 5
RiversideCA. gov
5 6
3 07/ 09/ 2021

TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT
Minimum Rear Yard - 10 Feet
Maximum Lot Coverage - 50%
Minimum Side Yard - 5 Feet
Minimum Building Separation - 10 Feet
1RIVERSDE
Minimum Front Yard - 15 Feet
Average Lot Size 5, 826 Square Feet —
7 RiversideCA. gov
7 8
4 07/ 09/ 2021

BUILDING ELEVATIONS
Spanish Santa Barbara

SINGLE - STORY
Italianate Craftsman Bungalow
9 RIVERSIDE RiversideCA. gov
9 BUILDING ELEVATIONS - TWO- STORY
Spanish Santa Barbara Italianate

1. 11...;_ii... t,:.,, iiiii
hargitil
thTtan

EIDICIENI
Craftsman Bungalow
10 RiversideCA. gov
10 5
07/ 09/ 2021
11 Parkway landscaping
Project Perimeter
Landscape Setback
16 feet
Perimeter Wall

VARIANCE
Required Project Perimeter Landscape Setback = 25 feet
Proposed Project Perimeter Landscape Setback = 10 feet to 16 feet

LURIN AVENUE
Property Line
Project Perimeter
Landscape Setback
10 feet
RIVER$IDE
12 RiversideCA. gov
6 07/ 09/ 2021

RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Planning Commission:

DETERMINE that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the findings set forth in the case record and adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration ( MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ( MMRP) pursuant to Section 21081. 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines; and
APPROVE Planning Case PR -2021-001057 ( Tract Map No. 37733, Planned Residential Development Permit, Design Review, and Variance), based on the findings summarized in the Staff Report and subject to the recommended conditions.
1741

RIVERSIDE
13 RiversideCA. gov
13 OBSIDIAN PLANNED RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT
PR -2020- 00733 ( Tract Map No. 37733, Planned Residential Development, Variance, and Design Review)
Community & Economic Development Department
Planning Commission
Agenda Item: 3
July 22, 2021
14 RiversideCA. gov
7 07/ 09/ 2021

GENERAL PLAN MAP

REFERENCE ONLY
LDR
LDR
MDR
OODC
MDR
Project Site
LDR - Low Density Residential
KEY
O
GeneralPlan Land Use Designation

A/ RR- AGRICULTURAL/ RURAL RESIDENTIAL
MDMMDR DENS1 E51DMENL
PARK

VLDR- VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENML
11 LDR - LOWDENSITYRESIDENnAL
LDR

DOVING LN
VLDRI

CITY BOUNDARY
OME RD
VLDR
15 RIVERSIDE RiversideCA. gov
15 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN

REFERENCE ONLY
e A Q A.
in i
J
1 II a
E^
V196II
ILfie. a

1. I s 1
e 1
9 9
510,
II
MB I
4/ r#
riD I
iC:. G iriu
r/
p• I- a
g4
B6iwvia
i L i i Y©
Irf I
NORTH 16
IiIVER$IDE
16 RiversideCA. gov
8 07/ 09/ 2021

CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN

REFERENCE ONLY
NORTH 17
IZIYI.IZ51UC RiversideCA. gov
17 18
9 rl I ILx
7,-,......--
II
1"1.

I
Ix
v. w
l• 4°
e
w
1 I. CIFII-- 11
Y_
II
NORTH 17
IZIYI. IZ51UC RiversideCA.gov
17 18
9 RIVERSIDE

FLOOR PLANS
Floorplan 1

REFERENCE ONLY
r I
NI
Floorplan 2 20
RiversideCA. gov
07/ 09/ 2021
n

WALL/ FENCE EXHIBIT

REFERENCE ONLY
toe
r
IPI--. 100
osz
o
WALL AND FENCE LEGEND:
e
ANORTH 19
RIVERSIDE RiversideCA. gov
19 20
10 11
I
1 N
1 j—
e
L® 11II
ii
ry
ION
L_
rk_,
1 r7 _
F I. Y
1 p C
Floorplan1

REFERENCEONLY
r I
NI
Floorplan2 20
RiversideCA.gov
07/ 09/ 2021
n

WALL/ FENCE EXHIBIT

REFERENCEONLY
toe
r
IPI--. 100
osz
o
WALL AND FENCE LEGEND:
e
ANORTH 19
RIVERSIDE RiversideCA.gov
19 20
10 07/ 09/ 2021

FLOOR PLANS

REFERENCE ONLY
Floorp an 3 21

RIVERSIDE
21 FLOOR PLANS

REFERENCE ONLY
Floorplan 4 22

RIVERSIDE
22 11
4 wtuni.tdF6l7
Amin i ffII
j T1 u
1 I rag
4" MIME,
1 r
I
1111111
NESmini j
d
I ..,,
i.... S.
r
I' Vi;;;

7..^m; -
al
Second Floor First Floor
4 Bedroom 3, 5 Bat
II
Ii 1 i—
Floorpan3 21

RIVERSIDE
21 FLOOR PLANS

REFERENCEONLY
Floorplan4 22

RIVERSIDE
22 11
07/ 09/ 2021

FLOOR PLANS

REFERENCE ONLY
Second Floor
Floorplan 5 23
RIVERSIDE RiversideCA. gov
23 12