Cities Index.
Public Comments

Land Use, Sustainability, and Resilience Committee
February 13, 2023

Document
Public Comments
Meeting
February 13, 2023
Body
Land Use, Sustainability, and Resilience Committee
Original file
1.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on riversideca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

From:EE_______Ha__<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,202310:21AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲUsePlanningCommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeimmediateaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfor awarehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amendthe
Title19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalis
toavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityof
RiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

ElisaEstrellaͲHahn,92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses



From:AndreaLynnWood<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20238:27AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
Dear Land-use planning committee,

I am submitting this email for Agenda Item 1 - Public Comment for the Land-Use Planning Committee meeting on January 9, 2023.

In December, members of RNOW, Friends of Riverside Hills, LULAC, CCAEJ, Inland Equity Partnership, and others gave public comment to this committee and the City Staff requesting a warehouse moratorium in the City of Riverside. You chose not to follow up on that request.

Today, I’d like to ask you to take action. Since you have chosen not to act on our request for a warehouse moratorium, please take action to protect residential neighborhoods from the planned development of mega-warehouses near our homes.

Amend the Title 19 Development Standards to include a third bin of warehouses prohibiting industrial projects greater than 500,000 square feet within 1,500 feet of residential homes.

Current Good Neighbor Guidelines set setback standards of:
- Within 200 feet – no larger than 10,000 square feet
- Between 200-800 feet – no larger than 100,000 square feet

Add a bin for:
- Between 800-1,500 feet – no larger than 500,000 square feet (individual) or 1,000,000 square feet (cumulative).

Note, the choice of 500,000 or 1,000,000 is based on the (still pending) City Attorney’s interpretation of the cumulative impact rule. The goal is to avoid mega-warehouses and/or warehouse complexes adjacent to residential zoning (i.e, the West Campus Upper Plateau project).

This will protect our community and other neighborhoods from the encroachment of large warehouse complexes adjacent to our neighborhoods. The March JPA Executive Director pledged to meet or exceed all City of Riverside Good Neighbor Guidelines. Please take action to protect our community from the mega-warehouse complex proposed on our borders.

Continued inaction is inexcusable.
Andrea Wood
Riverside Neighbors Opposing Warehouses

From:mkymsecltr<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20235:12AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected];Edwards,Erin<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicComment fortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollow uponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandards
toincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehouses and/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines. Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

JohnWHagmann,92506
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:ClintonClark<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20233:43AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfor theLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowup onthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardsto
includeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/or warehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Please takeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe
megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

ClintonClark

RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses







From:Ajay&AmishaShah<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20239:43PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.
Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amend
theTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoal
istoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCity
ofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

AjayShah
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:ANTHONYSCIMIAJR<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20237:37PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemail
forAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearour
homes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800
feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed 
allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

AnthonyScimiaJr
20829IndigoPoint,
Riverside,CA,92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


SentfrommyiPhone

From:TheHarvillaFamily<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20236:51PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲUsePlanningCommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgenda
Item1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandͲUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.You
chosenottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amendthe
Title19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalis
toavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e.,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityof
RiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
GeorgeHarvilla
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:AmishaShah<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20236:43PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

AmishaShah
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

From:markcalhoun<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20235:58PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowupon thatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoinclude
athirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial
projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehouse complexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetake actiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MarkandAmyCalhoun
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:JohnViafora<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20233:41PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
CAUTION:ThisemailisoriginatedfromOUTSIDEofCityofRiversideandwasnotsentbyanyCity OfficialsorCityStaff.Donotclickonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouareexpectingtheemailand knowthatthecontentissafe.Ifyoususpectthisisaphishingormaliciousemail,pleasecontactthe helpdesk.

IDearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequesting awarehouse
moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000
squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutive Directorpledgedtomeetorexceed
allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.ContinuedinactionisinexcusableRiverside NeighborsOpposingWarehouses

JohnViafora
Indigopoint

From:MJRivera<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20233:21PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.You
chosenottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalis
toavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.
Linda & Milo Rivera
92508

RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:kaelanbarrios<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,202311:26AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:KDoty<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,202311:03AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
CAUTION:ThisemailisoriginatedfromOUTSIDEofCityofRiversideandwasnotsentbyanyCity OfficialsorCityStaff.Donotclickonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouareexpectingtheemailand knowthatthecontentissafe.Ifyoususpectthisisaphishingormaliciousemail,pleasecontactthe helpdesk.

DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequesting awarehouse
moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000
squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutive Directorpledgedtomeetorexceed
allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

KristineDoty
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:MelodyClark<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,202311:16PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Inexplicablyyou
chosenottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amendthe
Title19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalis
toavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityof
RiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

Dr.MelodyClark(92506)
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

SentfrommyiPad

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:KimberlySico<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20239:00AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

KimberlyHeiting
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:LenoraMitchell<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20238:41AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

LenoraMitchell
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:KELLEYPAGE<[email protected]>
Sent:Sunday,January8,20238:14AM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

SuzannePage
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses



ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:MollyNazeck<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,202310:19PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1Ͳ
PublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan
100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MollyNazeck
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses






From:VeronicaJuarez<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20239:35PM
To:Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>;[email protected];CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowupon thatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoinclude
athirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial
projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehouse complexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetake actiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe
megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

VeronicaJuarez
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
OrangecrestResident,92508

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:CM<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20238:02PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgenda
Item1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amend
theTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCity
ofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

ClayMuehls
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


SentfrommyiPhone

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:MicheleMuehls<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20238:00PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MicheleBelloMuehls
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


~Michele❞❟❠❡❢❣
SentfrommyiPhone

From:simaraoufian<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20237:12PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:RickLloyd<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20237:05PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.
RickLloyd,92508

RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:JeanAklufi<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20236:00PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:JoeAklufi<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:58PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

JosephS.Aklufi
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


JoeAklufi
(951)377Ͳ4255

From:ShaanSaigol<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:24PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

ShaanSaigol,OrangecrestNeighborhood(92508)
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

From:NicoletteRohr<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:20PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandUsePlanningCommitteeMembers,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgenda
Item1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses,FriendsofRiversideHills,Center forCommunityActionandEnvironmentalJustice,InlandEquityPartnership,andothersgavepublic commenttothiscommitteerequestingawarehousemoratoriuminthe CityofRiverside.AsI
understandit,youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
I’dliketoaskyouagainnowtotakeactionnowtoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofwarehousesnearhomesandpreventmegaͲwarehousesandwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning
(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject).

Weknowtheseprojectsarebadforourcommunitiesandourhealth.Thebenefitstheytout,likejobs andfunding,arenotgoodjobsorsustainablefunding,andarenegligiblecomparedtothecostsinterms ofairquality,health,andenvironmentaldamage.This isnottheRiversidewewant.

Thankyou,

NicoletteRohr
RiversideͲ92506

From:AnnMarchand<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:17PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandͲUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Iwouldliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestforawarehouse moratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanneddevelopmentof megaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Theundersignedwouldliketoseezerowarehousesbuiltanywherewithinthecityand/orcountyof Riverside.Theyarechokingustodeath....

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

Ann&DoloresMarchand

RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
CanyonCrest/92506

From:SallyQuintana<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:13PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

SallyQuintana
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


SentfrommyiPhone

From:ConnieRansom<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20235:04PM
To:Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>;CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo <[email protected]>
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommitteemeetingon January9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership,andothers gavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehousemoratoriumintheCityof Riverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Whilemyhomeisnotdirectlyadjacenttoawarehouseproject,Icareabouttheneighborhoodsimpactedaswell asdamagethesewarehouseprojectscancontributetoSycamoreCanyonparkandothernaturepreserves.The riparianstreamthatrunsthroughSycamoreCanyonisalreadyindangerofbecomingafloodissue,andthe poisonedrunofffrommegaparkinglotsanddieseltruckswouldaffectnaturalhabitatallthewaytotheSantaAna Riverandbeyond.Thisisnotsomethingthatcanbepatchedupafterthedamageisdone.Riversideisabeautiful citybecauseofsomegoodstewardshipinthepast.Pleasedonoterasethisbeautybyallowingtheseprojectsto encroachontheseparksandneighborhoods.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestforawarehouse moratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanneddevelopmentofmegaͲ warehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrialprojects greaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet(cumulative). 
Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationofthe cumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexesadjacentto residentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexes
adjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceedallCityofRiverside GoodNeighborGuidelines.PleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthemegaͲwarehousecomplex proposedonourborders.
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.
Sincerelyyours,
ConnieRansom
506ViaZapata92507.
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
ConnieRansom
BrokerAssociate,ColdwellBankerRealty
6809BrocktonAvenue
Riverside,CA92506
951Ͳ202Ͳ3355
CALRE#01261047
[email protected]
RansomͲMcKenzie.com
From:RitaSchneider<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20234:49PM
To:Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]>;CityClerkMbx<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.Wedon’twantthesewarehousesbyourhomesandschools. 
RitaSchneider
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:TomParkinson<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20234:46PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

TomParkinson,27yearresidentofOrangecrest,RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses.Wehave paidourduesallallready.Nomoreplease.Yourchokingisout. 
ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:MelissaSuarez<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20234:36PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MelissaSuarez



From:JerryShearerJr.<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20234:13PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>;Edwards,Erin <[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
Dear Land-use planning committee,

I am submitting this email for Agenda Item 1 - Public Comment for the Land-Use Planning Committee meeting on January 9, 2023.

In December, members of RNOW, Friends of Riverside Hills, LULAC, CCAEJ, Inland Equity Partnership, and others gave public comment to this committee and the City Staff requesting a warehouse moratorium in the City of Riverside. I was one of these speakers and it is clear that you chose not to follow up on my request for a moratorium while the City considers updating land use goals and regulations.

I am writing again to ask you to take action. Since you have chosen not to act on residents request for a warehouse moratorium, please take time to reconsider your inaction and consider how you will protect residential neighborhoods from the planned development of mega-warehouses near our homes.

I ask that you amend the Title 19 Development Standards to include a third bin of warehouses prohibiting industrial projects greater than 500,000 square feet within 1,500 feet of residential homes.

Current Good Neighbor Guidelines set setback standards of within 200 feet – no larger than 10,000 square feet, and between 200-800 feet – no larger than 100,000 square feet.

I am asking you to add a bin for larger complexes and mega-buildings between 800-1,500 feet – no larger than 500,000 square feet (individual) or 1,000,000 square feet (cumulative).

Note, the choice of 500,000 or 1,000,000 is based on the (still pending) City Attorney’s interpretation of the cumulative impact rule. The goal is to avoid mega-warehouses and/or warehouse complexes adjacent to residential zoning (i.e, the West Campus Upper Plateau project).

This will help protect our community and other neighborhoods from the encroachment of large warehouse complexes adjacent to our neighborhoods. The March JPA Executive Director pledged to meet or exceed all City of Riverside Good Neighbor Guidelines. Please take action to protect our community from the mega-warehouse complex proposed on our borders and hold neighboring jurisdictions accountable for their harmful actions.

Continued inaction is inexcusable.

Jerry Shearer, 92508
Riverside Neighbors Opposing Warehouses



From:christinemartin<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20234:12PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IloveRiverside!Asalongtimeresident,since1964,Igrewup, pursuedmyeducationandservedasa
highschoolteacherformy30yearcareerinthiscommunity.Thisisawonderfulplacetoliveandmake ameaningfullife.IhopeRiversideremainsawelcomingandhealthyplacetoliveandprosperforthe nextgenerations.

Tothisend,
IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanning CommitteemeetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000square
feet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

ChristineMartin
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
CanyonCrestneighborhood,92506


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:RichardStalder<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:58PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
CAUTION:ThisemailisoriginatedfromOUTSIDEofCityofRiversideandwasnotsentbyanyCity OfficialsorCityStaff.Donotclickonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouareexpectingtheemailand knowthatthecontentissafe.Ifyoususpectthisisaphishingormaliciousemail,pleasecontactthe helpdesk.

DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequesting awarehouse
moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000
squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutive Directorpledgedtomeetorexceed
allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

RichardStalder
3732BeechwoodPlace
Riverside,CA92506
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
SentfrommyiPad

From:JonathanPeaslee<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:46PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

JonathanPeaslee92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

From:peasleeamber<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:45PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1Ͳ
PublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenot
tofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalistoavoid
megaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

AmberPeaslee
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
92508


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:MaryViafora<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:31PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemail
forAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet
–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.
ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MaryViafora
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehousesͲIndigoPoint,Riverside 

SentfrommyiPhone

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:williamhsu<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:26PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

Bill


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:MaryViafora<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:22PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1Ͳ
PublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan
100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MaryViafora
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehousesͲOrangecrestResident 

SentfrommyiPhone

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:PeterPettis<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:20PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

PetePettis
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:DenetteLemons<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:19PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunity fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>DenetteLemons.92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:SusanaBalmer<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:11PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardsto
includeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Please takeactiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

SusanaBalmer
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:AaronBushong<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20233:11PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
Dear Land-Use Planning Committee:

I am submitting this email for Agenda Item 1 - Public Comment for the Land-Use Planning Committee meeting on January 9, 2023. In December, members of R-NOW, Friends of Riverside Hills, LULAC, CCAEJ, Inland Equity Partnership, and others made public comments to your committee and the City staff requesting a warehouse moratorium in the City of Riverside. You chose not to ignore that request.

Today, I am asking you to take action. Since you have chosen to ignore our request for a warehouse moratorium, please amend the Title 19 Development Standards to include a third category of warehouses prohibiting industrial projects greater than 500,000 square feet within 1,500 feet of residential homes.

Current Good Neighbor Guidelines establish setback standards of: within 200 feet, no larger than 10,000 square feet and between 200 - 800 feet, no larger than 100,000 square feet. Please add the following category: between 800 - 1,500 feet, no larger than 500,000 square feet (individual) or 1,000,000 square feet (cumulative).

Please note that the choice of 500,000 square feet or 1,000,000 square feet is based on the (still pending) City Attorney’s interpretation of the cumulative impact rule. The goal of the proposed category is to prevent mega-warehouses and/or warehouse complexes from being built adjacent to residential zoning (e.g., the West Campus Upper Plateau project). The proposed category will protect our community and other neighborhoods from the encroachment of large warehouse complexes adjacent to our neighborhoods.

The March JPA Executive Director pledged to meet or exceed all City of Riverside Good Neighbor Guidelines. Please take action to hold her to account and to protect our community from the mega- warehouse complex proposed on our borders. No "further study" is necessary. The evidence is clear, abundant, and irrefutable. The March JPA is destroying our neighborhood, polluting our air, congesting our roads, and affecting our health. Continued inaction is a dereliction of duty, an insult to your constituents, and inexcusable.

Please take immediate action.

Aaron Bushong, Riverside Neighbors Opposing Warehouses

22.5-year resident of the Orangecrest neighborhood (92508) 
ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:PeterPettis<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20232:56PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19
DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGood
NeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

PetePettis
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:NicoleBernas<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20232:48PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublic
CommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.
InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19Development
Standardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalistoavoid
megaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighbor
Guidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

NicoleBernas&HoneyBernas
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


ႰႰႰ

From:aracelyguerra<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20232:30PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowupon thatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoinclude
athirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial
projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehouse complexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetake actiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe
megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.
AracelyGuerra
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:CarolynRasmussen<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:50PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemailfor
AgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

CarolynRasmussen
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:SueNipper<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:42PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfor theLandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowup onthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardsto
includeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/or warehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Please
takeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe
megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

SusanNipper
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
92508

From:TiaBallesteros<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:38PM
To:Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]>;CityClerkMbx<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchose
nottofollowuponthatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle
19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.Thegoalisto
avoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiverside
GoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

MyhomeisdirectlyimpactedbythisdevelopmentandIamextremelydisappointedthatourconcerns continuetobeignored.


TiaBallesteros
SaltcoatsDrive92508
RiversideNeighbors
OpposingWarehouses

From:KarenBaker<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:27PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowupon thatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoinclude
athirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial
projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehouse complexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetake actiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<KarenBaker
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:TomRadulski<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:24PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 

DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmittingthisemail
forAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet
–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.
ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

<NAME>ThomasRadulski,Orangecrest
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


SentfrommyiPhone

From:JenL<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:23PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamdiscouragedthatyoureceivedover100+
emailsfromresidentslastmeetinganddidnotevenputa discussionofatemporarywarehousemoratoriumonyournextagenda.Yourcontinuedchoicenotto takemeaningfulactiontorespondtoorprotectconstituentsisdisappointingtoeverydayresidentslike me.Thefactthatstaffreferredtooverahundredemailsasa"formletter"skirtstheissuethatpeople whoaredirectlyaffectedbyyouractionandinactionarebeggingyoutolistentousandconsiderour needs.

Ifyouwillnotconsideratemporarymoratorium(arequestwhichIstillbelieveistotallyreasonable giventhatthe
guidelinesforindustrialdevelopmentarestillbeingstudied);thenatleasttakeactionto protectresidentsbyamendingtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehouses prohibitingindustrialprojectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Thegoalistoavoid
megaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexesadjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e, theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject).InthecaseoftheWestCampusUpperPlateauproject,even thoughitisnotintheCityofRiverside,amendingyourguidelinesmightstillprotectyourresidentsby signalingtotheMarchJPA,whoseExecutiveDirectorvowedto"meetorexceed"yourguidelines,that theystillhavearesponsibilitytoconsidergreatersetbackstoprotecttheresidentsofRiverside. 
Pleasetakeactiononourbehalfasyouwereelectedtodo. 
Thankyou.

JenLarrattͲSmith
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:OscarZenteno<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:09PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
CAUTION:ThisemailisoriginatedfromOUTSIDEofCityofRiversideandwasnotsentbyanyCity OfficialsorCityStaff.Donotclickonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouareexpectingtheemailand knowthatthecontentissafe.Ifyoususpectthisisaphishingormaliciousemail,pleasecontactthe helpdesk.

DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iamsubmitting
thisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehouses
nearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200
Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeet orexceed
allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

OscarZenteno
92508
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses

From:BradCopeland<[email protected]>
Sent:Saturday,January7,20231:06PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowupon thatrequest.

Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoinclude
athirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial
projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehouse complexes
adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetake actiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

BradleyCopeland
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


From:JosieSosa<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20236:23PM
To:Edwards,Erin<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; Fierro,Ronaldo<[email protected]>;CityClerkMbx<[email protected]> Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem
1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

Amendthe
Title19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolarger
than100,000squarefeet

Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityof
RiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

JosieSosa
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses
ͲͲ

Josie Sosa


From:JingZenteno<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20237:53PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

IamsubmittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentforthe LandUsePlanningCommittee
meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardsto
includeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
ͲBetween200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof thecumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetor exceedallCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Please takeactiontoprotectourcommunity
fromthemegaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders. 
Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

Jing Sequoia
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses


ͲͲͲͲͲOriginalMessageͲͲͲͲͲ
From:AbdallahKarim<[email protected]>
Sent:Monday,January9,20239:55PM
To:CityClerkMbx<[email protected]>;Plascencia,Gaby<[email protected]>; EEdwards@riversideca;[email protected]
Subject:[External]PublicCommentforAgendaItem1ͲLandUsePlanningmeetingJanuary9 
CAUTION:ThisemailisoriginatedfromOUTSIDEofCityofRiversideandwasnotsentbyanyCity OfficialsorCityStaff.Donotclickonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouareexpectingtheemailand knowthatthecontentissafe.Ifyoususpectthisisaphishingormaliciousemail,pleasecontactthe helpdesk.

DearLandͲuseplanningcommittee,

Iam
submittingthisemailforAgendaItem1ͲPublicCommentfortheLandUsePlanningCommittee meetingonJanuary9,2023.

InDecember,membersofRNOW,FriendsofRiversideHills,LULAC,CCAEJ,InlandEquityPartnership, andothersgavepubliccommenttothiscommitteeandtheCityStaffrequestingawarehouse moratoriumintheCityofRiverside.Youchosenottofollowuponthatrequest. 
Today,I’dliketoaskyoutotakeaction.Sinceyouhavechosennottoactonourrequestfora warehousemoratorium,pleasetakeactiontoprotectresidentialneighborhoodsfromtheplanned developmentofmegaͲwarehousesnearourhomes.

AmendtheTitle19DevelopmentStandardstoincludeathirdbinofwarehousesprohibitingindustrial projectsgreaterthan500,000squarefeetwithin1,500feetofresidentialhomes. 
CurrentGoodNeighborGuidelinessetsetbackstandardsof: ͲWithin200feet–nolargerthan10,000squarefeet
Ͳ
Between200Ͳ800feet–nolargerthan100,000squarefeet 
Addabinfor:
ͲBetween800Ͳ1,500feet–nolargerthan500,000squarefeet(individual)or1,000,000squarefeet (cumulative).

Note,thechoiceof500,000or1,000,000isbasedonthe(stillpending)CityAttorney’sinterpretationof the
cumulativeimpactrule.ThegoalistoavoidmegaͲwarehousesand/orwarehousecomplexes adjacenttoresidentialzoning(i.e,theWestCampusUpperPlateauproject). 
Thiswillprotectourcommunityandotherneighborhoodsfromtheencroachmentoflargewarehouse complexesadjacenttoourneighborhoods.TheMarchJPAExecutiveDirectorpledgedtomeetorexceed allCityofRiversideGoodNeighborGuidelines.Pleasetakeactiontoprotectourcommunityfromthe megaͲwarehousecomplexproposedonourborders.

Continuedinactionisinexcusable.

AbdallahKarim
RiversideNeighborsOpposingWarehouses




← All documents from this meeting