Cities Index.
Attachment 15 - Draft Map Ranked Criteria Matrix

Riverside City Council
February 21, 2023

Document
Attachment 15 - Draft Map Ranked Criteria Matrix
Meeting
February 21, 2023
Body
Riverside City Council
Original file
29.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on riversideca.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

RANKED CRITERIA
A3
Woodstreets whole
B
Minimum Change
C2
Casa Blanca kept whole
C3
Minor Change to C2
C4
Modification Wards 7&6
D BBRA
Brown/Black Redistricting
Alliance
D3
Downtown Eastside split
into separate wards
D4
Northside Reallocation
moves Northside
Neighborhood into
Ward 7
D5
Brown/Black Redistricting
Alliance modifications
How many majority minority‐wards are
there? 4 (1,5,6,7) 3 (1,6,7) 4 (1,3,6,7)  4 (1,3,6,7) 4 (1,3,6,7) 4 (1,2,3,4) 4  (1,3,4,7) **** 4 (1,3,4,7 4 (1,2,3,4) Latino CVAP majority‐minority wards
Ward 1 ‐ 55%
Ward 5 ‐ 52.2%
Ward 6 ‐ 58.3%
Ward 7 ‐ 54.5%
Ward 1 ‐ 50.6%
Ward 6 ‐ 60.9%
Ward 7 ‐ 54.5%
Ward 1 ‐ 52.5%
Ward 3 ‐ 54.3%
Ward 6 ‐ 57.2%
Ward 7 ‐ 57.1%
Ward 1 ‐ 52.5%
Ward 3 ‐ 54.3%
Ward 6 ‐ 57.2%
Ward 7 ‐ 57.1%
Ward 1 ‐ 52.5%
Ward 3 ‐ 54.2%
Ward 6 ‐ 58.6%
Ward 7 ‐ 55.9%
Ward 1 ‐ 54.7% ****
Ward 2 ‐ 50.4% ****
Ward 3 ‐ 54.2% ****
Ward 4 ‐ 60% ****
Ward 1 ‐ 56.3% ****
Ward 3 ‐ 57% ****
Ward 4 ‐ 65.7% ****
Ward 7 ‐ 50.6% ****
Ward 1 ‐ 52.9% ****
Ward 3 ‐ 53.7% ****
Ward 4 ‐ 56.7% ****
Ward 7 ‐ 54.7% ****
Ward 1 ‐ 54.5% ****
Ward 2 ‐ 50.4% ****
Ward 3 ‐ 52.2% ****
Ward 4 ‐ 63.3% ****
Are the wards relatively equal in
population? YES

YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Has a total deviation under 10% 8.1% 3.9% 7.0% 7.0% 5.7% 5.1% 2.7% 7.4% 7.8% Are the wards geographically
contiguous? YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Does the map minimize divisions of
neighborhoods and communities of
interest? *

YES NO YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
How many neighborhoods are
maintained/split? 22M/5S 14M/13S 16M/11S 17M/10S 18M/9S 18M/9S 20M/7S 20M/7S 16M/11S Are the lines easy to identify and
understand? ** YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Are the wards compact?*** YES YES
Wards 3 & 5 are slightly
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts  and maintain
COI testimony
Wards 3 & 5 are slightly
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts and maintain
COI testimony
Wards 3 & 5 are slightly
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts and maintain
COI testimony
Wards 4 & 6 are
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts and maintain
COI testimony
Wards 1, 5 & 6 are
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts, balance
population and
maintain COI testimony
Wards 1 & 5 are slightly
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts and population
balance
Wards 4 & 6 are
noncompact in order to
create
majority/minority
districts and maintain
COI testimony
**** Please refer to the published draft map to identify the location of the numbered ward, as the numbers may not correspond with the current ward numbering sequence. ***Council wards shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations. *The geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest should be respected and included within a single ward for its effective and fair representation in a manner that minimizes its division. **Council wards should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents.

ATTACHMENT 15 - Draft Map Ranked Criteria Matrix

← All documents from this meeting