1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10 FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
11 HISTORIC COURTHOUSE
12 OLD RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION, a Case No. CVRI2105778
13 California nonprofit corporation, FIRST Related to Case No. CVRI2105791 14 CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF
RIVERSIDE, a California nonprofit Assigned for all purposes to:
15 corporation, MISSION DISTRICT Judge Chad Firetag, Dept. 3 16 ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability corporation, HISTORIC MISSION ¡PROPOSEDI PEREMPTORY WRIT OF Electronically RECEIVED by Superior Court of California, County of Riverside on 06/14/2023 03:58 PM - Jason B. Galkin, Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court By Amia Brown, Clerk 17 INN CORPORATION, a California
MANDATE
18 corporation, and GABRIEL ROTH, an
individual, (CEQA, Pub. Resources Code, § 21167)
19 20 Petitioners and Plaintiffs, [Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1085, 1088] VS.
21 Hearing:
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE CITY
22 COUNCIL, and DOES 1 through 100, Дері 3
23 inclusive,
24 Respondents and Defendants; Date Action Filed: December 21, 2021 Trial Date: June 2, 2023
25 GREENS INV 10, LLC, and ROES 1 through
26 20,
27 Real Party in Interest.
28 29 AND RELATED CASES.
30 31
32 33
-1-
91/029297-000 _PRAZOSED] PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
249989.1 a06/14/
1 TO RESPONDENT CITY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE RIVERSIDE CITY
COUNCIL AND ALL OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES AND OTHER PERSONS 3 ACTING ON THE CITY'S BEHALF:
4 The Court having entered judgment in the above-entitled mandamus action, ordering that a 5 peremptory writ of mandate be issued,
6 YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED, no later than 60 days following 7 receipt of this writ, to do each of the following:
8 (1) To rescind, set aside, and void all determinations, decisions, and approvals related to 9 the proposed development of a hotel project to be located at 3420-3482 Mission Inn 10 Avenue ("Project") that were made, upheld, and/or issued by the City of Riverside 11 and/or the Riverside City Council on or about November 16, 2021, including, but not 12 limited to, (a) the determination that the Project is exempt from review under the 13 California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and (b) Planning Case Nos. P19-0563 14 (Certificate of Appropriateness), P19-0560 (Conditional Use Permit), P19-0561 15 (Variance), and P19-0562 (Variance).
16 (2) To make and file a return to this writ, setting forth what the City has done to satisfy the 17 terms of this peremptory writ of mandate.
18 19 LET THE FOREGOING WRIT ISSUE.
20 21 July 25
Dated: June- _, 2023 By:
22 Hon. Chad W. Firetag
Judge of the Superior Court
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 -2-
2091/029297-0002 _PROPOSED| PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
19249989.1 a06/14/23
Superior Court of California
County of Riverside
4050 Main Street
Riverside, CA 92502
Receipt No: 20230725-00342.1 Cashier: Kristen
Payor: Southern California Legal Support Date: 07/25/2023 Time: 12:09 PM CASE # CVRI2105778
OLD RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION vs CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Line Item: Issuing writ for enforcement of order of judgment, writ of execution; abstract 40.00 Case Total: 40.00
Check #: 186172 40.00
Total Paid: 40.00
Change: 0.00
Current Balance: 0.00
KEEP THIS RECEIPT FOR YOUR RECORDS
Receipt must be provided as proof of payment in case of a dispute