1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Betty Hao <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:37 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations.
And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
25 yr resident. Let’s get this settled
Sincerely,
Betty hao
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Candy Blokland <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:44 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update Dear Councilm embers, Staff, Thank you for the opportunity to provide comme nt on the Industrial Developm ent Regulati ons . I support Option 2 – the Planni ng Commissi on Recom mend ation pass ed 8-0 in February 2025. It is disappointing that the Council ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nnerStartZjQcm QRYFp fptBanner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations.
And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Candy Blokland
92508
Sent from my iPhone
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Christine Heinemann <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:18 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Christine Heinemann
92508
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Daniel Martinez <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:21 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Daniel Martinez
92504
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Eunhee Kim <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:44 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Eunhee Kim
Raleigh, NC 27615
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Gary Mares III <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:25 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment on the recent Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Devel opment regulations. And it
is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Gary Mares
92508
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Jonathan Peaslee <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:33 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Peaslee
92508
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Kyle Reed <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:58 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations.
And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Kyle Reed
92506
Sent from my iPhone
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Lynn L <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:47 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Dr. Lynn Larsen
Dayton St., Riverside, CA
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Molly Nazeck <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 11:03 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers and Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations.
And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Molly Nazeck
92518
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Peter Pettis <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:35 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations.
And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Peter Pettis
92508
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62
1 Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update
From: Trish Welbourne <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2025 10:50 AM
To: Falcone, Philip <[email protected]>; Cervantes, Clarissa <[email protected]>; Robillard, Steven <[email protected]>; Conder, Chuck <[email protected]>; Mill, Sean <[email protected]>; Perry, Jim <[email protected]>; Hemenway, Steve <[email protected]>; 2Mayor <[email protected]>; CityClerkMbx <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment for Item 62 - Industrial Development Regulations Update ZjQcmQR YFpfptBa nner End
Dear Councilmembers, Staff,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on the Industrial Development Regulations. I support Option 2 – the Planning Commission Recommendation passed 8-0 in February 2025.
It is disappointing that the Council continues to delay bringing this to a vote. In May of this year, the Council motioned to ‘Take Action’ in August. There were no changes to state legislation over the past 4 months that have had any substantive impact on our potential Industrial Development regulations. And it is disheartening to see proposed changes that exclude manufacturing and other land uses from the proposal without consultation with community stakeholders or the Planning Commission.
Please pledge to put this to a vote this year.
Sincerely,
Patricia Welbourne
92508
CC Date: 8-19-25
Item No.: 62