Attachment 3
Wetland Data Forms
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
Santa Ana River Tributary Restoration Projects, Early
Implementation Services for the Upper Santa Ana River
Habitat Conservation Plan
Attachment 3 – Wetland Data Forms
Hidden Valley Wetlands Site Wetland Data Forms
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-1
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
ditch concave 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'50.09"N 117°29'13.24"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater emergent wetla
1 1
100.0
10 60
Salix nigra 60 Yes OBL
Salix laevigata No10
70 FACW
70 80
0 0
0 20
60 1.14
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-1
0-4 2.5Y 4/2 100 Sandy loam
Sandy loamM C 27.5 YR 5/6982.5Y 4/24-8
Sandy loam 1002.5Y 4/28-18+
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-2
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Pond depression concave 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'51.39"N 117°29'7.77"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 2
100.0
60 Yes
Yes
20 40
Schoenoplectus californicus
Typha domingensis
60 OBL
OBL
Vegetation along banks of pond feature.
60 60
0 0
0 0
60 1.00
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-2
Sample point in pond, hydric soils assumed due to presence of standing water. several feet
Sample point in pond.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-3
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'51.60"N 117°29'7.84"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 3
66.7 30
25 5
15 Sample point upslope of pond.
Salix laevigata 30 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides No5
35 FAC
Baccharis salicifolia Yes
10 10
FAC
Yes
No
5 25
Melilotus albus
Heterotheca grandiflora
30 Not Listed
FACU
75 250
125
20 45
60 0
3.33 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-3
0-20+ 2.5 Y 4/2 100 Loamy sand
No hydric soils present, upslope of pond feature.
Sample point upslope of pond feature. No hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-4
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'46.63"N 117°29'6.75"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 2
100.0
70 30
Salix gooddingii 70 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides No10
80 FAC
Baccharis salicifolia Yes
20 20
FAC
All mature vegetation, no young understory.
100 230
0 0
90 140
0 2.30
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-4
0-4 2.5Y 4/2 100 Sandy loamy clay
Sandy clayM C 25 YR 4/6982.5Y 4/24-7
Sandy loam 1002.5Y 4/28-10
Sandy loamy clayM C 25YR 4/6982.5Y 2.5/110-18+
Abundant wrack in area, appears to be fallen material, not from flow/hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-5
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'48.66"N 117°28'55.60"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 2
100.0
100
Salix lasiolepis 80 Yes FACW
Washingtonia robusta Yes20
100
FACW
No understory.
100 200
0 0
0 200
0 2.00
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-5
0-20+ 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy sand
No hydric soil indicators
No hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-6
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Drainage concave 5
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'47.64"N 117°28'48.76"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam No data
3 3
100.0
60 15
Salix gooddingii 40 Yes FACW
40 Salix exigua Yes
Yes
15 20
Baccharis salicifolia
35 FACW
FAC
75 165
0 0
45 120
0 2.20
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-6
0-16 2.5YR 4/2 70 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M Sandy loamy clay
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-7
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'47.92"N 117°28'48.74"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 5
60.0 10
115
15 Salix exigua 10 Yes FACW
Sambucus nigra Yes15
25 FACU
Nicotiana glauca Yes
Yes
10 5
Baccharis salicifolia
15 FAC
FAC
Yes
100 Helianthus annuus
100
FACU
5 ft. above test 24.
140 525
0 460
45 20
0 3.75
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-7
0-12 2.5YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam
No Hydric soil indicators.
No hydrological indicators present.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-8
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Floodplain none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'50.11"N 117°28'36.93"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 5
60.0 25
13 55
Within OHWM.
Salix lasiolepis 15 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides Yes15
30 FAC
Baccharis salicifolia Yes
No
No5
5 40
Salix exigua
Salix lasiolepis
50 FAC
FACW
FACW
Yes
Yes
8 5
Cynodon dactylon
Melilotus albus
13 FACU
FACU
93 267
0 52
165
50 0
2.87 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-8
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 Fine sandy loam
Sand 1002.5 Y /23-4
Fine sandy loam 10010YR 3/24-5
Sand 1002.5 Y /25-20+
potential problem soils, recently deposited sediment
Dug a separate exploratory pit- ground water at 32".
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-9
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace convex 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'49.74"N 117°28'37.38"W WGS-84 Terrace escarpments No data
2 5
40.0 20
11 25
Populus deltoides 20 Yes FAC
20 Baccharis salicifolia Yes
5 5
FAC
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
10 10
10 1
Hirschfeldia incana
Ambrosia acanthicarpa
Helianthus annuus
Salsola tragus
31 FACU
FACU
Not Listed
Not Listed
56 219
100
44 75
0 0
3.91 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-9
0-4 10YR 4/3 100 Sand
Sandy loam 10010YR 4/34-12
compact soils
12 inches
No hydrology indicators, at 4-5 ft. higher.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-10
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Floodplain none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'2.71"N 117°28'54.79"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 3
100.0
65 2
15 Salix laevigata 55 Yes FACW
55 Salix interior Yes
10 10
FACW
Yes
No
2 15
Melilotus albus
Baccharis salicifolia
17 FAC
FACU
82 183
0 8
45 130
0 2.23
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-10
0-6 2.5Y 4/2 100 Loamy sand
Gravel/Sand 1002.5Y 4/36-10
Sand 1002.5Y 4/310-20+
Soils are sandy and naturally problematic, no redox observed however may be recently deposited sand.
Hydrophytic vegetation and hydrology indicators met, therefore soils are assumed hydric as well.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-11
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Terrace none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'0.79"N 117°28'55.49"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
0 3
0.0 40
Point taken in old 2012 channel location. Older wrack line observed. To review historic aerials to see transition of channel location.
Yes
Yes
Yes
10 10
20 Ambrosia acanthicarpa
Heterotheca grandiflora
Eriogonum gracile
40 Not Listed
Not Listed
Not Listed
40 200
200
0 0
0 0
5.00 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-11
0-6 10YR 4/2 100 Sand deposited 2-3 years ago
no hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Hidden Valley Riverside 8/8/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HV-12
Team 1 and 2 Undefined
Outer flow plain none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'58.11"N 117°29'7.01"W WGS-84 Delllo loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 3
66.7 10
25 10
Salix exigua Yes
Yes
10 10
Baccharis salicifolia
20 FACW
FAC
Yes
25 Heterotheca grandiflora
25 Not Listed
45 175
125
0 30
20 0
3.89 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HV-12
0-18+ 2.5Y 4/1 100 Sandy loam
no hydric soil indicators observed.
No hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
%% Total Cover:
%
%
%
%%
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside 8/31/16
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-13
Team 2 Undefined
Depression none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'46.61"N 117°29'16.55"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Emergent Wetl
2 2
100.0
25 85
Salix lasiolepis 85 Yes FAC
85 Baccharis salicifolia Yes25
25 FACW
Full of litter and debris.
110 305
0 0
255
50 0
2.77 Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 4 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9) 4Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) wetland hydrology must be present.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand.3 3 HV-13
0-18+ 10YR 4/2 85 5YR 4/4 15 C M Clay loam
Constructed berm, depressional area. Has not actively ponded in several years however due to its depth may still be ponding and receiving groundwater input. near center of depression mulefat is dying off.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
%% Total Cover:
%
%
%
%%
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside 8/31/16
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-14
Team 2 Undefined
Depression concave 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'47.88"N 117°29'16.25"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Emergent Wetl
2 2
100.0
25 80
Sample point taken with a depressional area.
Salix lasiolepis 80 Yes FAC
80 Baccharis salicifolia Yes25
25 FACW
105 290
0 0
240
50 0
2.76 Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 4 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9) 4Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) wetland hydrology must be present.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand.3 3 HV-14
0-20 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Clay loam
Hydric soils observed.
Small sediment deposits on trees.
Constructed berm, depressional area. Has not actively ponded in several years however due to its depth may still be ponding and receiving groundwater input. near center of depression mulefat is dying off.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
%% Total Cover:
%
%
%
%%
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside 8/31/16
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-15
Team 2 Undefined
Depression none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'43.43"N 117°29'14.49"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Pond
2 2
100.0
50 40
Salix laevigata 40 Yes FAC
40 Baccharis salicifolia Yes50
50 FACW
90 220
0 0
120
100
0 2.44
Arid West - Version 11-1-2006
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 4 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9) 4Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) wetland hydrology must be present.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand.3 3 HV-15
0-18 10YR 4/2 95 7.5YR 5/6 5 C M Clay loam
Hydric soils observed.
Constructed berm, depressional area. Has not actively ponded in several years however due to its depth may still be ponding and receiving groundwater input. near center of depression mulefat is dying off.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-16
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Flood plain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.962637 -117.472101 NAD 1963 Terrace escarpments Freshwater Forested/Shru b
5 5
100.0
80 1
3 65
20 Salix gooddingii 60 Yes FACW
Salix lasiolepis Yes20
Populus fremontii No10
Platanus racemosa No10
100
FACW
FAC
FAC
Baccharis salicifolia Yes
25 25
FAC
Yes
Yes
No
No
No1
1 2
20 20
Stipa miliacea
Melilotus albus
Ricinus communis
Schoenoplectus americanus
Xanthium strumarium
44 FAC
OBL
FACU
FACU
NI
The sample point habitat area was dominated with with OBL, FACW and FAC vegetation. 169 392
5 12
195
160
20 2.32
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-16
0-2 10 YR 4/1 100 Loamy Clay
Sand10010 YR 6/23-5
SandM C 1010 YR 6/89010 YR 6/26-18
Redox concentration was observed in the soil and met the requirements for the depleted matrix indicator. The sandy soils texture was more prominent as you neared the main channel.
Three secondary indicators for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-17
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Upper flood plain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.962549 -117.472058 NAD 1963 Terrace escarpments Freshwater Forested/Shru b
1 3
33.3 60
15 40
This sample point was located approximately 5 feet higher than HV-16.
Salix gooddingii 60 Yes FACW
60 Yes
Yes
15 40
Phacelia cicutaria
Verbesina encelioides
55 FACU
NI
45 The the sample point habitat area was dominated with with FACW and upland vegetation. 115 355
75 160
0 120
0 3.09
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-17
0-12 10 YR 4/1 100 Sand
Compact
12 inches
No hydric soil indicators were observed within the sample pit.
No primary nor secondary indicators for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-18
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Drainage none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.961721 -117.489126 NAD 1963 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 3
66.7 45
55 Fraxinus dipetala 55 Yes NI
Salix lasiolepis Yes25
80 FACW
Baccharis salicina Yes
20 20
FACW
95 The sample point habitat area was dominated with with FACW vegetation. 100 365
275
0 0
90 0
3.65 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-18
0-2 10 YR 2/1 100 Organic layer
SandM C 510 YR 4/69510 YR 3/23-5
Redox was also observed Loamy clayPLC 157.5 YR 4/68510 YR 4/16-18 in the Matrix
The soil was still moist which suggest ponding within this area occurs. Redox concentrations were also observed in the matrix and pore linings of the soil sample.
One primary indicator for wetland hydrology was observed within the sample area. Shelfing was also observed on either side of the bank, appears that water ponds more within this area and slowly moves downstream. No active flow indicators observed within this area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-19
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.961688 -117.489180 NAD 1963 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 4
50.0 15
50 50
This sample point was located approximately 10 feet higher in elevation from HV-18.
Fraxinus dipetala 50 Yes NI
Salix lasiolepis Yes10
60 FACW
Baccharis salicina Yes
5 5
FACW
Yes
50 Bromus diandrus
50 FACU
The sample point habitat area was dominated with with upland and FACW vegetation. 115 480
250
200
0 30
0 4.17
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-19
N/A
Rock/Fill
At Surface
No sample pit was dug because the soil was all rock and fill. Because the sample area was dominated with upland vegetation and no wetland hydrology indicators were observed the soil was assumed non-hydric.
No primary nor secondary indicators for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-20
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Abandon basin none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.962628 -117.489298 NAD 1963 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Emergent Wetl
2 4
50.0 10
5 10
7 Baccharis salicina Yes
Yes7
10 Nicotiana glauca
17 FACW
FAC
Yes
Yes
5 10
Hirschfeldia incana
Cirsium vulgare
15 FACU
Not Listed
80 The sample point habitat area is mostly unvegetated as it appears the area is slowly becoming invaded by upland vegetation. Area is dominated with a mixture of wetland and upland vegetation. 32 106
25 40
21 20
0 3.31
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-20
0-16 10 YR 3/2 98 10 YR 4/6 2 C M Loamy Clay
The sample soil pit has potentially relic soils from historic ponding. The area does not meet for a hydric soil indicators were observed within the soil sample pit.
No primary nor secondary indicators for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area. The sample area is located within an old pond. Riparian vegetation occur near the edge of the ponds that are lower in elevation.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-21
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Basin concave 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.963340 -117.488757 NAD 1963 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Emergent Wetl
4 4
100.0
55 45
Salix gooddingii 50 Yes FACW
50 Baccharis salicifolia Yes
40 40
FAC
Yes
Yes
5 5
Lepidium latifolium
Conium maculatum
10 FACW
FAC
The sample point habitat area was dominated with with FACW and FAC vegetation. 100 245
0 0
135
110
0 2.45
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-21
0-16 10 YR 5/1 98 7.5 YR 5/8 2 C M Loamy Clay
Redox concentrations were observed within the soil sample and the requirements for the depleted matrix indicator were met.
One primary and one secondary indicator for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Upper SAR- Hidden Valley Riverside County 8/22/17
San Bernardino Valley MWD HV-22
L. Cervantes, L. Woolley Undefined
Bank near pond convex 40
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33.963340 -117.488757 NAD 1963 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Emergent Wetl
2 2
100.0
30 5
Sample point taken approximately 5 feet higher in elevation from HV-21.
Nicotiana glauca Yes
5 5
FAC
Yes
30Conium maculatum
30 FACW
70 The sample point habitat area was dominated with with FACW and FAC vegetation. Sample taken near top of hillslope of basin area.
35 75
0 0
15 60
0 2.14
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
HV-22
N/A
Compact Soils
constructed berm
No sample pit was dug due to the compact soils on the constructed berm. Soils are fill material and no hydrology observed within this area. Therefore, this area is no assumed hydric.
No primary nor secondary indicators for wetland hydrology were observed within the sample area.
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
Santa Ana River Tributary Restoration Projects, Early
Implementation Services for the Upper Santa Ana River
Habitat Conservation Plan
Attachment 3 – Wetland Data Forms
Lower Hole Creek Site Wetland Data Forms
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Lower Hole Creek Riverside 10/30/2018
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HC-1
Team 1; L. Cervantes Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'41.20"N 117°28'1.36"W WGS-84 Terrace escarpments No data
3 5
60.0 10
5 35
35 Vegetation data re-taken 10/30/2018 to document current conditions as the site is a recently restored flood plain. Area is a large sandbar in delta/Santa Ana River floodplain that is now well-established with wetland vegetation.
Populus fremontii (sapling) Yes
Yes
Yes
10 15
20 Salix exigua
Baccharis salicifolia
45 FAC
FAC
FACW
Yes
Yes
No
5 10
25 Ambrosia acanthacarpa
Erigeron canadensis
Melilotus albus
40 FACU
FACU
Not Listed
Wetland vegetation sapling trees have established well within this area. Low percentage of herbaceous vegetation. 85 290
25 140
105
20 0
3.41 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HC-1
0-9 10YR 4/2 100 Sandy loam
Sandy loamM C 307YR 4/67010YR 4/29-16
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Lower Hole Creek Riverside 8/9/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HC-2
Team 1 Undefined
River/stream bank concave <1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'40.98"N 117°28'1.30"W WGS-84 Terrace escarpments No data
4 5
80.0 36
15 10
4 Sample point at edge of OHWM.
Salix gooddingii Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
10 5
5 10
Salix lasiondra
Baccharis salicifolia
Tamarix rassimossa
5Periscaria lapithfolia
35 FACW
FAC
FAC
FACW
FACW
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
2 4
2 2
5 Echinochloa crus-gali
Veronica anagallis- aquatica
Leptochloa uninerva
Polypogon monospeliensis
Cyperus eragrostis
15Melilotus albus
30 FACW
FACW
FACW
OBL
FACW
FACU
65 166
0 60
30 72
4 2.55
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HC-2
0-8 5Y 3/1 85 7.5YR 4/6 15 C M Silty loam
Silty loam 1005Y 3/18-16
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Lower Hole Creek Riverside 8/9/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HC-3
Team 1 Undefined
Sandbar convex <1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'34.20"N 117°27'51.23"W WGS-84 Terrace escarpments No data
5 8
62.5 50
17 15
50Salix gooddingii 40 Yes FACW
40 Fraxinus dipetela Yes
Yes
Yes
5 5
10 Baccharis salicifolia
Ailanthus altissima
20 Not Listed
FACU
FAC
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
10 10
10 7
Arundo donax
Xanthium strumarium
Ricinus communis
Pipatherum miliaceum
37 Not Listed
FACU
FAC
FACW
Yes
35Vitis girdiana
35 FAC
45 132 395
85 60
150
100
0 2.99
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HC-3
0-4 10YR 4/3 100 Sand
Sandy loamy clayM C 57.5Y 4/6955Y 3/14-9
Sand 100Gley 1 N2.5/-9-16
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Lower Hole Creek Riverside 8/9/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP HC-4
Team 1 Unefined
Terrace none 3
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'33.82"N 117°27'51.39"W WGS-84 Terrace escarpments No data
2 4
50.0 40
55 2
35 Salix gooddingii 25 Yes FACW
Fraxinus dipetela Yes35
Washingtonia Robusta No10
70 Not Listed
FACW
Yes
No
No
5 2
20 Arundo donax
Ricinus communis
Piptatherum miliaceum
27 Not Listed
FACU
FACW
Yes
35Vitis girdiana
35 FAC
60 132 468
275
8 105
80 0
3.55 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP HC-4
0-16+ 10YR 3/2 100
No hydric soils
Located within OHWM.
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
Santa Ana River Tributary Restoration Projects, Early
Implementation Services for the Upper Santa Ana River
Habitat Conservation Plan
Attachment 3 – Wetland Data Forms
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Site Wetland Data Forms
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-1
Team 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'6.30"N 117°25'49.97"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Riverine
3 5
60.0 45
5 20
50 Populus deltoides 45 Yes FAC
Salix Lasiolepis Yes45
90 FACW
Artemisia Californica Yes
Yes
5 5
Baccharis Salicifolia
10 Not Listed
FAC
Yes
20 Phacelia Ramosissima
20 FACU
120 345
25 80
150
90 0
2.88 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-26 7.5YR 3/2 100 Sand
No hydric soil indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-2
Team 2 Undefined
Floodplain (outer) none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'3.05"N 117°25'53.12"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Riverine
4 4
100.0
65 70
Sample Point within OHWM of the Santa Ana River.
Salix gooddingii 60 Yes FACW
60 Salix exigua Yes
Yes
30 5
Baccharis salicifolia
35 FACW
FAC
Yes40Vitis Girdiana
40 FAC
135 340
0 0
210
130
0 2.52
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-6 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Sandy loam
Can only dig to 6 in. due to root obstruction
Wracks prevalent
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-3
Team 2 Undefined
Floodplain (outer) none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'2.90"N 117°25'51.88"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Riverine
2 4
50.0 40
20 80
20Salix gooddingii 40 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides Yes20
60 FAC
Artemesia californica Yes
20 20
Not Listed
Yes
80 Phacelia ramosissima
80 FACU
Upland area, some hydrophytic veg. present, but does not meet veg. 160 560
100
320
60 80
0 3.50
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-12 10YR 4/2 100 Sand
All sand, difficult to dig deeper because sand would cave into pit.
No rack or sign of wetland hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-4
Team 1 Undefined
edge of creek concave 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'1.21"N 117°25'50.71"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand No data
5 5
100.0
70 15
Salix lasiolepis 60 Yes FACW
60 Salix lasiolepis Yes
5 5
FACW
Yes
Yes
5 10
Persicaria lapathifolia
Urtica dioica
15 FAC
FACW
Yes5Vitis girdiana
5 FAC
85 185
0 0
45 140
0 2.18
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-7 10YR 5/1 80 5YR 3/4 20 C M Loamy clay
Loamy clay 10010YR 2/17-24
7+"
7"
Sample plot ~5' from creek edge.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-5
Team 1 Undefined
hillslope flat 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'1.29"N 117°25'51.66"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand No Data
1 4
25.0 60
5 Acacia sp. 10 Yes UPL
10 Nicotiana glauca Yes
5 5
FAC
No
Yes
Yes
25 20
5 Hordeum vulgare
Bromus diandrus
Datura stramonium
50 UPL
UPL
UPL
65 315
300
0 15
0 0
4.85 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 3/6 100 Sandy loam
Yes (riprap)
16"
Area did not support redox features or any indicators of hysdric soils. no wetland hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-6
Team 2 Undefined
Drainage none 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'0.15"N 117°25'46.18"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 4
75.0 5
5 55
Taken within drainage, steep slopes, veg. along banks
Populus fremontii 15 Yes FAC
Washingtonia Californica Yes5
20 FACW
Yes
5 Artemisia californica
5 Not Listed
Yes40Vitis Girdiana
40 FAC
65 200
25 0
165
10 0
3.08 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
Flowing water 1 ft. deep, no pit taken. Soils are hydric. 12 in.
At surface
At surface
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-7
Team 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'0.48"N 117°25'46.20"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
4 5
80.0 10
5 65
Phoenix dactylifera 5 Yes FAC
Washingtonia Californica Yes5
Salix laevigata Yes5
15 FACW
FACW
Yes
5Conyza sp
5 Not Listed
Yes60Vitis Girdiana
60 FAC
80 240
25 0
195
20 0
3.00 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-18 10YR 2/2 100 Loamy clay
No redox or hydric soil indicators observed within this area.
Sample point taken once redox was no longer observed.
No wetland hydrology, sample point taken about 8ft. higher in elevation from wetland sample point.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-8
Team 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'59.00"N 117°25'31.03"W WGS-84 Delhi fine sand Freshwater Emergent Wetl
3 3
100.0
5 1
90 Populus deltoides 5 Yes FAC
5 Baccharis salicifolia Yes
10 10
FAC
Yes
No
No
1 5
75 Hirschfeldia incana
Polypogon monspeliensis
Distichlis spicata
81 FAC
FACW
Not Listed
96 285
5 0
270
10 0
2.97 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-6 10YR 3/1 100 Loamy Clay
Sand 10010YR 3/17-18
No hydric soils present.
No hydrological indicators; Sample point within terrace adjacent to drainage.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-9
Team 2 Undefined
Floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'56.10"N 117°25'32.31"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
6 6
100.0
80 5
50 80
Salix gooddingii 20 Yes FACW
Salix lasiolepis Yes20
Phoenix dactylifera No5
45 FACW
Not Listed
Baccharis salina Yes
No
Yes30
10 30
Baccharis salicina
Salix exigua
70 FAC
FACW
FACW
Yes
80 Anemopsis californica
80 OBL
Yes20Vitis girdiana
20 FAC
215 415
25 0
150
160
80 1.93
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-8 10YR 3/2 95 10YR 6/8 5 D M Loamy Clay
Sand 10010YR 3/28-20
Redox in top layer.
Some saturation at surface soils, sample location just upslope of depression with rush.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-10
Team 2 Undefined
Floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'56.46"N 117°25'32.08"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 2
100.0
90 60
Baccharis salicina Yes
No
10 90
Nicotina glauca
100
FACW
FAC
Yes50Vitis girdiana
50 FAC
150 360
0 0
180
180
0 2.40
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-6 10YR 3/2 100 loam
Hit refusal at 6 in, root obstruction.
Upslope from wetland data point.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-11
Team 1 Undefined
floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'57.38"N 117°25'12.42"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand No Data
3 4
75.0 40
25 30
Indicators that area has burned in past present. No paired "IN" pit due to dense veg. preventing access further into drainage.
Salix lasiolepis 40 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides No10
50 FAC
Rosa californica Yes
10 10
FAC
Yes
25 Ambrosia psilostachya
25 FACU
Yes
10Vitis girdiana
10 FAC
95 270
0 100
90 80
0 2.84
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-15 10YR 4/2 100 Sandy loam
No hydric soil indicators
No hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-12
Team 1 Undefined
Floodplain- compacted land none 0-1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'56.55"N 117°25'12.22"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand No Data
2 3
66.7 60
50 20
Salix exigua 60 Yes FACW
60 Melilotus albus Yes
50 50
FACU
Yes
20 Lepidium latifolium
20 FAC
130 380
0 200
60 120
0 2.92
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-3 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy clay
Loamy clayM C 307.5YR 4/67010YR 2/13-18
2 layers, sample pit in road.
Some salt crust present around soil pit.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-13
Team 1 Undefined
flood plain terrace flat <1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'5.58"N 117°25'1.59"W WGS-84 Dello fine loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
4 6
66.7 25
10 45
10 Out pit.
Salix exigua 5 Yes FACW
5 Rosa californica Yes
Yes
20 45
Baccharis salicina
65 FAC
FACW
Yes
Yes
Yes
5 10
5 Melilotus albus
Anemopsis californica
Ambrosia psilostachya
20 FACU
OBL
FACU
90 235
0 40
135
50 10
2.61 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 4/1 99 10YR 5/6 1 C M Sandy loam
No hydric soil indicators above 12". More redox present below 16".
No additional hydrology indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-14
Team 1 Undefined
low area none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'3.89"N 117°24'53.10"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand No Data
3 3
100.0
10 41
40 Test pit taken at edge of Baccharis/ Anemopsis stands, just within Baccharis zone.
Baccharis salicifolia Yes
Yes
10 40
Pluchea sericea
50 FAC
FACW
Yes
No
1 40
Distichlis spicata
Anemopsis californica
41 OBL
FAC
No additional comments.
91 183
0 0
123
20 40
2.01 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-20+ 10YR 4/2 100 Sandy loam
No hydric soil indicators present.
No hydrology indicators present.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-15
Team 1 Undefined
low area flat 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'4.21"N 117°24'53.50"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
1 1
100.0
15 5
75 Test pit with Anemopsis stand surrounded by Baccharis stand. Lower depression than surrounding area.
Yes
No
No
5 15
75 Distichlis spicata
Ambrosia psilostachya
Anemopsis californica
95 OBL
FACU
FAC
95 150
0 60
15 0
75 1.58
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-0.5 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
Sandy loam M C 1010YR 4/69010YR 4/20.5-7
Sandy clay loamM C 1010YR 4/69010YR 4/27-18+
0-0.5" layer has high component of organic material.
Drainage pattern = slight depression.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-16
Team 1 Undefined
low flow channel convex 2
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'11.93"N 117°24'48.16"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 5
60.0 65
2 30
Within drainage, on upstream section of willow/riparian stand.
Salix gooddingii 60 Yes FACW
Salix lasiolepis Yes5
65 FACW
Arundo donax Yes
Yes
1 1
Ficus carica
2 FACU
FACU
Yes30Vitis girdiana
30 FAC
20 Closed canopy lacking herb stratum.
97 228
0 8
90 130
0 2.35
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Sandy loam
Multiple low flow channels within wetland area.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-17
Team 1 Undefined
Low flow channel convex 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'12.07"N 117°24'46.80"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam No Data
4 6
66.7 45
40 70
Vegetation has more tree of heaven and less canopy cover.
Ailanthus altissima 30 Yes FACU
Ficus carica Yes10
40 FACU
Salix lasiolepis Yes
Yes
30 15
Salix gooddingii
45 FACW
FACW
Yes
Yes30
40 Rubus armeniacus
Vitis girdiana
70 FAC
FAC
No herb stratum present.
155 460
0 160
210
90 0
2.97 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam
No hydric soil indicators.
No hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-18
Team 1 Undefined
low flow channel concave 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'10.52"N 117°24'53.85"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
6 6
100.0
50 90
25 Salix lasiolepis 20 Yes FACW
Salix gooddingii Yes10
30 FACW
Baccharis salicina Yes
20 20
FACW
Yes
Yes
25 70
Anemopsis californica
Distichlis spicata
95 FAC
OBL
Yes20Vitis girdiana
20 FAC
~5
165 395
0 0
270
100
25 2.39
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-25 10YR 4/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Sandy Loam
Area supported a depleted matrix. Redox found throughout matrix.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-19
Team 1 Undefined
low terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'10.15"N 117°24'52.99"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
1 1
100.0
2 80
18 Although the area supports wetland vegetation (as with the majority of the site), the area did not support wetland hydrology or hydric soils.
Yes
No
No
2 18
80 Heliotropium curassavicum
Anemopsis californica
Distichlis spicata
100
FAC
OBL
FACU
100 266
0 8
240
0 18
2.66 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-25 10YR 4/3 100 Sandy Loam
No redox was observed within this area. Area did not support hydric soils.
Sample point upland, no indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-20
Team 1 Undefined
Floodplain flat 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'10.26"N 117°25'0.44"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 2
100.0
50 11
4 80
Arrow weed stand, no drainage pattern associated with this area to indicate that this area flows.
Pluchea sericea Yes
50 50
FACW
No
Yes
No
No
1 4
80 10
Stephanomeria
Phacelia ramosissima
Distichlis spicata
Croton californica
95 Not Listed
FAC
FACU
Not Listed
2 145 411
55 16
240
100
0 2.83
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-25 10YR 4/2 100 Sand
No redox or other hydric soil indicators observed.
No hydrology indicators present.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-21
Team 1 Undefined
ditch concave 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'6.95"N 117°24'38.29"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand No Data
3 4
75.0 62
20 Ditch, has some small pockets of wetland, however mostly nonwetland water.
Washingtonia robusta 25 Yes FACW
25 Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
2 10
5 25
15 Polypogon monspeliensis
Echinochloa crus-galli
Melilotus albus
Cyperus eragrostis
Bassia hyssopifolia
57 FACU
FACW
FACU
FACW
FACW
82 204
0 80
0 124
0 2.49
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-14 2.5Y 4/1 100 Sandy loam
Sandy loamM C 302.5Y 5/6702.5Y 5/114-16
Sample point in ditch, no wetland indicators observed other than FAC- neutral test.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-22
Team 1 Undefined
Terrace flat 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'9.43"N 117°24'55.37"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
5 5
100.0
55 7
75 Salix lasiolepis 35 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides Yes15
50 FAC
Baccharis salicina Yes
20 20
FACW
No
Yes
No
2 40
5 Croton californica
Distichlis spicata
Bromus madritensis
47 UPL
FAC
Not Listed
Yes
20Vitis girdiana
20 FAC
137 370
35 0
225
110
0 2.70
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-10 10YR 4/2 100 sandy loam
Sandy clay loamM C 302.5Y 4/3702.5Y 4/210-14+
Almost meets for F3 but redox/matrix contrast is faint. Redox is +/- diffuse throughout 10-14+ layer.
No wetland hydrology indicators observed.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-23
Team 1 Undefined
low area flat 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'9.01"N 117°24'55.52"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 3
100.0
45 20
No distinct OHWM however, there is a clear distinction between upland and wetland based on vegetation.
Salix lasiolepis 45 Yes FACW
45 Yes
Yes5
15 Rubus ursinis
Vitis girdiana
20 FAC
FAC
A lot of leaf litter.
65 150
0 0
60 90
0 2.31
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-4 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy loam
Sandy loam 10010YR 3/14-8
Sandy loamM C 157.5YR 4/68510YR 4/28-16
Hydrology indicators +/- weak however, hydrology assumed due to landscape position and obvious change in composition/ cover.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/ Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-24
Team 1 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'11.88"N 117°24'59.66"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
6 7
85.7 35
65 120
Salix lasiolepis 30 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides Yes30
Fraxinus velutina Yes10
Sambucus nigra No5
75 FAC
FAC
FACU
Baccharis salicina Yes
5 5
FACW
Yes
Yes
60 40
Ambrosia psilostachya
Distichlis spicata
100
FAC
FACU
Yes40Vitis girdiana
40 FAC
Location upland of test 5, ~5ft. higher in elevation.
220 690
0 260
360
70 0
3.14 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-26 10YR 4/2 100 Sand
No indicators.
No indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-25
Team 1 Undefined
floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'12.49"N 117°24'58.92"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
4 4
100.0
85 35
Salix lasiolepis 55 Yes FACW
Populus deltoides Yes20
75 FAC
Baccharis salicina Yes
30 30
FACW
Yes15Vitis girdiana
15 FAC
Unknown ORN tree not included in veg. strata.
120 275
0 0
105
170
0 2.29
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-1 10YR 2/1 100 Organics
Sandy Loam 10010YR 4/21-8
Redox at 8"Sandy LoamM D 1510YR 5/88510YR 5/28-17
Area supported a depleted matrix. Redox found at eight inches.
Hydrology assumed due to landscape position, hydric soils and wetland vegetation present.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-26
Team 1 undefined
Drainage none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'10.26"N 117°25'0.44"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Freshwater forested/shrub
3 3
100.0
80 20
20 Salix gooddingii 80 Yes FACW
Salix lutea Yes20
100
OBL
Yes20Vitis girdiana
20 FAC
120 240
0 0
60 160
20 2.00
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-8 10YR 4/1 100 Sandy Loam
ClayM C 35YR 4/69710YR 3/28-11
SandM C 2010YR 5/68010YR 6/211-30
Sample point in low point drainage and supported redox at 8 inches and deeper.
Sample point within drainage at the toe of slope, obvious bank.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/1/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-27
Team 1 Undefined
River bottom flat 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'25.59"N 117°25'6.11"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Riverine
4 5
80.0 20
5 45
5 Sample point adjacent to low flow; Sandy floodplain.
Salix gooddingii Yes
Yes
Yes25
20 20
Baccharis salicifolia
Tamarix ramossima
65 FACW
FAC
FAC
Yes
Yes
5 5
Nasturtium officinale
Melilotus albus
10 FACU
OBL
25 75 200
0 20
135
40 5
2.67 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-2 10YR 5/1 70 7.5YR 4/4 30 C M Sand
Sand 10010YR 5/12-16+
Area met for Depleted Matrix.
6"
4"
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-28
Team 1 Undefined
Floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'12.02"N 117°25'21.35"W WGS-84 Dello loamy fine sand Riverine
3 3
100.0
40 90
Salix lasiolepis 40 Yes FACW
40 Nicotiana gluaca Yes
10 10
FAC
Yes
80Vitis girdiana
80 FAC
No herb stratum present.
130 350
0 0
270
80 0
2.69 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
25+ 10YR 4/2 100 Fine Sandy loam
No hydric soil indicators.
No hydrological indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-29
Team 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'51.52"N 117°25'35.62"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 3
100.0
130
40 Baccharis salicina Yes
40 40
FACW
No
Yes
90 10
Conium maculatum
Urtica dioica
100
FAC
FACW
Yes30Vitis girdiana
30 FAC
170 380
0 0
120
260
0 2.24
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Loam
Could not dig past 6 in. due to rip rap and fill material.
No hydrological indicators.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/3/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-30
Team 2 Undefined
Drainage Floodplain none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°57'52.05"N 117°25'35.50"W WGS-84 Grangeville fine sandy loam Freshwater Forested/Shrub
5 5
100.0
105
30 Salix gooddingii 40 Yes FACW
Salix laevigata Yes40
80 FACW
Yes
Yes
5 20
Cyperus sp.
Arundo donax
25 FACW
FACW
Yes30Vitis girdiana
30 FAC
135 300
0 0
90 210
0 2.22
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-7 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy clay
Loam 10010YR 2/18-12
4" saturation.
10"
4"
4" saturation.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-31
Team 1 Undefined
In drainage concave 1
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'11.61"N 117°25'12.14"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
3 5
60.0 40
2 80
Salix lasiolepis 20 Yes FACW
Salix gooddingii Yes20
40 FACW
Melilotus albus Yes
2 2
FACU
Yes
5 Baccharis salicina
5 Yes
80Vitis girdiana
80 FAC
122 328
0 8
240
80 0
2.69 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-6 10YR 2/1 100 Sandy loamy clay
Sandy loam 100Gley 1 4/5GY 6-8
mixed with gley sand from 6-8"Sandy loamy clay 1005Y 3/18-12 Sandy loam 100Gley 1 4/5GY 12-24
12"
6"
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-32
Team 2 Undefined
Drainage none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'4.96"N 117°25'42.05"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
4 6
66.7 40
15 17
Salix lasiolepis 35 Yes FACW
Fraxinus sp. Yes10
45 FACU
Salix exigua Yes
Yes
Yes15
5 5
Ricinus communis
25 FACW
FACU
FAC
Yes2Vitis girdiana
2 FAC
72 191
0 60
51 80
0 2.65
Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 5/1 100 Sand
Sandbar recently deposited, problem soils sand bar
US Army Corps of Engineers
Arid West - Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, expl ain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks:
VEGETATION
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0 1
Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status
1. 2.
3. 4.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Total Cover:
Herb Stratum
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. 8.
Total Cover:
Woody Vine Stratum
1. 2.
Total Cover:
% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dominance Test is >50%
% % Total Cover:
%
%
%
% %
Anza Drain/Old Farm Road Riverside County 8/2/2016
San Bernardino Valley MWD SP ADFR-33
Team 2 Undefined
Terrace none 0
CA
C - Mediterranean California 33°58'4.72"N 117°25'41.86"W WGS-84 Dello loamy sand Freshwater Forested/Shrub
2 3
66.7 100
15 Populus deltoides 5 Yes FAC
5 Baccharis salicifolia Yes
10 10
FAC
Yes
No
5 95
Heterotheca grandiflora
Bromus Diandrus
100
Not Listed
Not Listed
115 545
500
0 45
0 0
4.74 Arid West - Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2 Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3 :
Histosol (A1) Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Vernal Pools (F9)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Other (Explain in Remarks)
wetland hydrology must be present,
SP ADFR
0-16 10YR 5/1 100 sand
Outside of ordinary high, not deposited from stream
No indicators, upslope from ordinary high water mark