3-12-26 - CPC Staff Report and Exhibits — Riverside City Council, October 20, 2026 (part 2 of 2)

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 36
JANUARY 2026
MM-CUL-3 Treatment and Disposition of Cultural Resources: In the event that Native American cultural resources are inadvertently discovered during the course of grading for this Project, the following procedures will be carried out for treatment and disposition of the discoveries:

Temporary Curation and Storage: During the course of construction, all discovered resources shall be temporarily curated in a secure location on site or at the offices of the Project archaeologist. The removal of any artifacts from the Project site will need to be thoroughly inventoried with tribal monitor oversight of the process; and Treatment and Final Disposition: The landowner(s) shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods, and all archaeological artifacts and nonhuman remains as part of the required mitigation for impacts to cultural resources. The Applicant shall relinquish the artifacts through one or more of the following methods and provide the City of Riverside Community and Economic Development Department with evidence of same:
a. Accommodate the process for on-site reburial of the discovered items with the consulting Native American tribes or bands. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts. Reburial shall not occur until all cataloguing and basic recordation have been completed;
b. A curation agreement with an appropriate qualified repository within Riverside County that meets federal standards per 36 CFR Part 79 and therefore will be professionally curated and made available to other archaeologists/researchers for further study. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility within Riverside County, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation;
c. For purposes of conflict resolution, if more than one Native American tribe or band is involved with the project and cannot come to an agreement as to the disposition of cultural materials, they shall be curated at the Western Science Center or Riverside Metropolitan Museum by default; and
d. At the completion of grading, excavation, and ground-disturbing activities on the site, a Phase IV Monitoring Report shall be submitted to the City documenting monitoring activities conducted by the Project archaeologist and Native Tribal Monitors within 60 days of completion of grading. This report shall document the impacts to the known resources on the property; describe how each mitigation measure was fulfilled; document the type of cultural resources recovered and the disposition of such resources; provide evidence of the required cultural sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the required pre-grade meeting; and, in a confidential appendix, include the daily/weekly monitoring notes from the archaeologist. All reports produced will be submitted to the City of Riverside, Eastern Information Center, and interested tribes.

MM-CUL-4 Cultural Sensitivity Training: The Secretary of Interior Standards County certified archaeologist and Native American monitors shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the developer/permit holder’s contractors to provide Cultural Sensitivity Training for all construction personnel. This shall include the procedures to be followed during ground disturbance in sensitive areas and protocols that apply in the event that unanticipated resources are discovered. Only construction personnel who have

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 37
JANUARY 2026
received this training can conduct construction and disturbance activities in sensitive areas. A signin sheet for attendees of this training shall be included in the Phase IV Monitoring Report.

3.6 Energy
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to energy conservation were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.13-14 through 4.13-20 and 5-30. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated for potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during project construction or operation, as the Approved Project would incorporate mitigation measures MM-AQ-2, MM-AQ-3, and MM-AQ-4 to reduce electricity, natural gas, and petroleum use. The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would also result in a less than significant impact for conflicts with or obstruction of state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency, as the Approved Project would comply with existing energy standards and regulations and implement mitigation measure MM-AQ-2 to improve efficiency beyond Title 24 requirements. Finally, the EIR concluded that cumulative impacts to energy conservation would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Additionally, the certified EIR assumed construction and operation would occur earlier than has actually taken place. As it is generally understood that construction equipment, building appliances, and utilities become increasing efficient as time passes due to new technologies or updated building codes, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to energy, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
See Section 3.3, Air Quality, for the text of mitigation measures MM-AQ-2, MM-AQ-3, and MM-AQ-4.

3.7 Geology and Soils
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to geology and soils were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 3-2 through 3-4. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts related to fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, expansive soils, and unstable geologic conditions, as the site is not located on or near a known fault, has low liquefaction and shrink-swell potential, and would be designed and constructed in accordance with the Project-specific geotechnical study, the California Building Code, and OSHPD standards. The Approved Project would also result in less than significant impacts related to soil erosion or loss of topsoil, as construction will comply with stormwater pollution prevention plans, best management practices, grading and

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 38
JANUARY 2026
building permit requirements, and geotechnical recommendations. Because all impacts related to geology and soils were determined to be less than significant, the topic was not discussed further in the EIR.

Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels are zoned for office use and anticipated for use for senior housing, and there would not be any change to the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. Because all affected parcels have previously been identified for development, it is not expected that the proposed Land Swap Project would disturb any land beyond what has already been assumed for development. Because no additional land would be developed that has not already been planned for development, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to geology and soils, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.5-29 through

4.5-36 and 5-15 through 5-16. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated for greenhouse gas emissions, as construction and operation would generate GHG emissions that would be reduced by 28.38% from baseline levels with implementation of mitigation measures MM-AQ-1 through MM-AQ-6. The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated for consistency with applicable plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, as the Approved Project would comply with the City of Riverside Climate Action Plan, Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 375, and the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG’s) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), with implementation of mitigation measures MM-AQ-1 through MM-AQ-6.

Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels are zoned for office use and anticipated for use for senior housing, and there would not be any change to the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. Therefore, the proposed Land Swap Project would not be expected to increase construction or operational greenhouse gas emissions beyond what was already evaluated in the certified EIR. Additionally, the certified EIR assumed construction and operational activities would occur earlier than has actually taken place. As it is generally understood that machinery and vehicles become “cleaner” as time passes due to new technology and emissions limitations, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 39
JANUARY 2026
Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
See Section 3.3, Air Quality, for the text of mitigation measures MM-AQ-1 through MM-AQ-6.

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous resources were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.6-15 through 4.6-19 and 5-16 through 5-17. As noted on page 4.6-1 of the Draft EIR, the IS/NOP concluded that potential impacts related to creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment; handling of hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; being located on a hazardous materials list that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment; being located within a private airstrip that would result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Approved Project area; impairing implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; and potential for wildlife fires were found either to have no impact or less than significant impact and were therefore not discussed further in the Draft EIR.

The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated for safety hazards related to proximity to a public airport, as the site is within Zone D of the March Air Reserve Base (March ARB) Land Use Compatibility Plan (LUCP), the proposed helistop and building heights comply with FAA Part 77 and Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) review requirements, and mitigation measures MM-HAZ-1, MM-HAZ-2, and MM-HAZ-3 would be implemented to ensure the safety of patients, staff, visitors, and aircraft operations. The EIR also concluded that cumulative impacts to hazards and hazardous materials will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
MM HAZ-1 A minimum of 45 days prior to submittal of an application for a building permit, the Project developer/applicant shall inform the City of Riverside Planning Division and Building and Safety Division if any Project-related vertical structures or construction equipment will exceed 1,664 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). Prior to construction, if it is determined that any Projectrelated vertical structures or construction equipment will exceed 1,664 AMSL, then at the beginning of construction, the Project developer/applicant shall submit a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 7460-1 to the FAA to ensure compliance with the FAA standards and air space obstruction-clearance. If FAA Form 7460-1 is required to be filed, the City shall not

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 40
JANUARY 2026
issue a building permit until the FAA issues a determination stating that the proposed construction will not be a hazard to air navigation.

MM-HAZ-2 The Project developer/applicant shall submit applicable plans and forms for the proposed helipad/helistop to the March Air Reserve Base (March ARB), Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), Riverside City Council, and California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics for review and approval. All conditions of approval from FAA, March ARB, and Riverside County ALUC shall be adhered to by the Project.

MM-HAZ-3 The following additional March ARB-required risk-reduction Project design features shall be incorporated into Project design:
▪ Reduce bird attractants at the Project site. To avoid increasing the risk of bird-aircraft strikes for March ARB or other aircraft transiting the vicinity of the Project site, the following measures shall be taken:
▪ Project Design: When possible, the Project shall incorporate passive bird exclusion designs into the structural design. Windows, ledges, roof edges, air vents and other features shall be designed to prevent roosting if possible, by incorporating angles of 45 degrees or more. For problem areas such as flat roofs where it is difficult to create slopes, the Project developers shall install a physical barrier to perching such as bird spikes, bird netting, or bird wire. The Project operator shall maintain these physical barriers to remove accumulated debris and ensure they continue to function. Installation of bird exclusion devices shall be by an experienced specialist, and any installation shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, California Endangered Species Act, and any other applicable federal, state, or local regulations.
▪ The Project developer and operator shall ensure that stormwater drainage does not allow for ponding of water on site or adjacent to the Project site. ▪ Project Construction: During construction, all trash shall be disposed of in enclosed bins.

Feeding of birds by workers on the Project site shall be prohibited. The prohibition of bird feeding shall be part of the construction personnel training directive as a requirement of daily working conditions. The construction contractor shall be responsible for monitoring and enforcing this requirement.
▪ Project Landscaping: The Project shall avoid the creation of large areas of turf grass or open water. When selecting landscaping trees, bushes, or other ornamental landscaping, the Project shall avoid planting any that produce fruit. Bird perching on Project landscaping shall be monitored by Project operators, and any landscaping that attracts substantial numbers of birds shall be removed and replaced with another variety.
▪ The take-off and landing patterns from the proposed helicopter operations shall be designed in a way to avoid conflicts with March ARB’s flight operations. ▪ The helistop shall be designed per FAA criteria with dimensions of 65 feet x 65 feet to serve the larger Sikorsky UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter for response to mass casualty events, especially if and when the hospital achieves trauma center status. ▪ Proposed flight paths shall be to and from the southwest and to and from the northwest for noise-abatement reasons, as well as to minimize potential conflicts with March AIR/Inland Port fixed-wing traffic.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 41
JANUARY 2026

3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to hydrology and water quality were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.7-17 through

4.7-27 and 5-17 through 5-18. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality, as it would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge; would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation; would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off site; and would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The EIR also concluded that cumulative impacts to hydrology and water quality will be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.11 Land Use and Planning
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to land use and planning were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.8-12 through 4.8-32 and 5-18. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation incorporated related to conflicts with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, as it would implement the Canyon Springs Healthcare Campus Specific Plan along with amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map, comply with applicable encroachment permits and Municipal Code requirements, and incorporate mitigation measures for air quality (MM-AQ-1 through MM-AQ-6), cultural resources (MM-CUL-2 and MM-CUL-4), noise (MM-NOI-1), transportation/traffic (MM-TRAF-1 through MM-TRAF-13), and utilities and service systems (MM-UTL-2 and MM-UTL-3). The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation incorporated related to conflicts with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, as it would comply with the Western Riverside MSHCP, implement MM-BIO-2 and MM-BIO-3 for burrowing owls and nesting birds, and participate in the Local Development Mitigation Fee program. Additionally, the EIR concluded that cumulative impacts to land use and planning will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 42
JANUARY 2026
Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels are zoned for office use and anticipated for use for senior housing, and there would not be any change to the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. Therefore, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to land use and planning, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
See Sections 3.3 (Air Quality), 3.4 (Biological Resources), 3.5 (Cultural Resources), 3.13 (Noise), 3.17 (Transportation), and 3.19 (Utilities and Services Systems) for applicable mitigation measures.

3.12 Mineral Resources
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
As stated on page 3-5 of the Draft EIR, the Approved Project would have no impact related to the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or the residents of the state, or the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site, as the Project site is designated MRZ-3, has been previously graded, and is surrounded by existing development. Because the Approved Project would not have any impacts related to mineral resources, the topic was not discussed further in the EIR.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.13 Noise
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to noise were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.9-19 through 4.9-49 and 5-19 through 5-21. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts related to exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of applicable standards, groundborne vibration or groundborne noise, substantial permanent increases in ambient noise levels from traffic, and substantial temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels. The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation related to operational stationary-source noise from trauma helicopter activities, which could exceed nighttime limits but would be reduced through implementation of MM-NOI-1. The EIR concluded

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 43
JANUARY 2026
that construction noise would result in a cumulatively less than significant impact, while operational noise will result in a cumulatively less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels are zoned for office use and anticipated for use for senior housing, and there would not be any change to the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. Therefore, the proposed Land Swap Project would not be expected to increase construction or operational noise beyond what was already evaluated in the certified EIR. For these reasons, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to noise, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
MM-NOI-1 Operational Noise Mitigation Measures
▪ Prior to certificate of occupancy for the proposed Hospital, Medical Office Building 3, Medical Office Building 4, or Parking Structure 1, whichever may be constructed first, the Project Applicant shall construct the proposed 8-foot-high perimeter wall (as shown on Figure 4.9-2) to reduce the operational noise levels at the adjacent sensitive receiver locations. ▪ Prior to certificate of occupancy for the proposed Hospital, the Project shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements of all federal, state, regional, and local agencies. At a minimum, such agencies include the Federal Aviation Administration, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission, the March Air Reserve Base/Inland Port Airport, the State of California Heliport Permitting process, and the City of Riverside Entitlement process. ▪ The proposed helipad shall be reviewed pursuant to the provisions of Riverside Municipal Code Title 19, Chapter 19.320.

3.14 Population and Housing
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to population and housing were discussed on pages 3-5 and 3-6 of the Draft EIR. That discussion concluded that the Adopted Project would result in less than significant impacts related to the displacement of existing housing or people, would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and would not induce substantial population growth. Because the Approved Project would have less than significant impacts related to population and housing, the topic was not discussed further in the EIR.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 44
JANUARY 2026
proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to population and housing, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.15 Public Services
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
As discussed on page 4.10-1 of the Draft EIR, the IS/NOP concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant or no impacts to police services, schools, parks, and other public services such as libraries.

Therefore, these services were not discussed further in the Draft EIR. Potential impacts related to fire protection services were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.10-5 through 4.10-7 and 5-21 through 5-22. The EIR concluded that the Adopted Project would result in less than significant impacts related to the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities, as existing fire stations would accommodate the Approved Project. Also, the EIR noted that cumulative impacts to public services would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.16 Recreation
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
As stated on page 3-6 of the Draft EIR, the Approved Project would have less than significant impacts related to the recreation because the Approved Project is not anticipated to substantially increase the use of existing parks or recreational facilities since there are proposed open space areas immediately adjacent to these facilities that will provide on-site recreational activities. Also, the Approved Project would not include residential type uses or businesses that will increase the use of existing parks or recreational facilities. For these reasons, impacts related to recreation were not discussed further in the EIR.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 45
JANUARY 2026
the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. Therefore, the proposed Land Swap Project would not be expected to increase demand for recreation facilities. For these reasons, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to recreation, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
No mitigation was required.

3.17 Transportation
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to transportation were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.11-38 through 4.11-86 and 5-22 through 5-28. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts to circulation system performance including intersections, roadways, and pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities; air traffic patterns and hazards to flight; hazards due to design features, incompatible uses, or inadequate emergency access; and conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation incorporated to circulation system performance for intersections and roadways under cumulative and General Plan buildout conditions through implementation of mitigation measures MM-TRAF-1 through MM-TRAF12. The EIR further concluded that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts to freeway operations and congestion management facilities because the I-215 southbound freeway mainline segment south of Eucalyptus Avenue would operate at unacceptable levels during peak hours, and mitigation is not feasible. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation incorporated to hazards to flight through implementation of mitigation measures MM-TRAF-13 and MM-TRAF-14.

Also, the EIR concluded that cumulative impacts will be significant and unavoidable with regards to the I-215 southbound freeway mainline segment, south of Eucalyptus Avenue; that cumulative impacts on area intersections, site access, circulation, and air traffic will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated; and that there will be no cumulative impacts on bicycle, pedestrian and transit circulation.

Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels are zoned for office use and anticipated for use for senior housing, and there would not be any change to the allowed uses, development capacity, or development standards. To determine whether the proposed Land Swap Project could potentially result in new or different impacts related to transportation, a focused traffic analysis was performed by Wood Rodgers in 2025. The memorandum detailing the analysis is included as Appendix A to this document. The traffic analysis assumed that the proposed Land Swap Project would remove 72 senior housing units from CSHC SP Site B and place them on Site A along the south side of Campus Parkway between Corporate Centre Place and Canyon Park Drive. As such there is no net change in the trip generation for the CSHC SP.

The memorandum also evaluated site access. Site access for the new parcels within Site A would be provided via Corporate Centre Place approximately 170 feet south of Campus Parkway (Project Driveway 1) and Campus Parkway approximately 315 feet east of Corporate Centre Place (Project Driveway 2). The previously approved driveway on Canyon Park Drive approximately 130 feet south of Campus Parkway (Project Driveway 3) will remain

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 46
JANUARY 2026
unchanged. Based on the trip generation and distribution for the proposed Land Swap Project, the Corporate Centre Place and Campus Parkway intersection and both new Project Driveways are expected to operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) (LOS B or better) conditions under AM and PM peak hour conditions with the proposed Land Swap Project in place.

When the CSHC SP EIR was certified, LOS was the key metric used for transportation analysis. Since that time, the CEQA Appendix G checklist has been revised, and LOS is no longer considered an environmental impact under CEQA. Because the CSHC SP EIR analyzed LOS, the discussion of LOS related to the proposed Land Swap Project is included. Currently, transportation environmental impacts are based on the concept of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). While a VMT analysis was not included in the CSHC SP EIR because that was not a metric used for analysis of transportation environmental impacts at that time, it is expected that the VMT generated by the CSHC SP would remain unchanged with the proposed Land Swap Project because there would not be an increase in acreage or any change in use from the project evaluated in the certified EIR.

For the reasons discussed above, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to transportation, from those previously identified in the certified EIR. The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
MM-TRAF-1 Valley Springs Parkway/Eucalyptus Avenue (#4): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer/applicant shall pay for and install two five-section signal heads as well as modify the signal phasing such that there is an overlap phase for the existing dual right turn lanes on the southbound approach. The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements.

MM-TRAF-2 I-215 Southbound Ramps/Eucalyptus Avenue (#3): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost for the installation of a traffic signal, and construct the traffic signal, to serve the southbound right turn only off-ramp and westbound through traffic. This configuration will be similar to the existing I-215 northbound right turn only offramp / Eucalyptus Avenue intersection design.

MM-TRAF-3 Valley Springs Parkway/Eucalyptus Avenue (#4): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to modify striping to provide a second left turn lane, in addition to the existing two through lanes on the northbound approach. The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-4 Day Street/Cottonwood Avenue (#13): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to widen Day Street to provide a separate right turn lane, in addition to the existing left turn lane and one through lane on the northbound approach. The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 47
JANUARY 2026
MM-TRAF-5 Day Street / Bay Avenue (#14): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to complete the following improvements:
▪ Northbound approach: Install a traffic signal and widen Day Street to provide a second through lane.
▪ Southbound approach: Widen Day Street to provide a second through lane. ▪ The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-6 Day Street/Alessandro Boulevard (#15): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to modify striping and the existing raised median to provide a second left turn lane, in addition to the existing three through lanes on the eastbound approach. The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-7 Memorial Way/Towngate Drive (#16): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to implement signal modifications for protected/permitted operations for both the north/south movements and the east/west movements as well as modify the intersection to include the following geometrics:
▪ Southbound approach: Convert the existing second through lane to provide a dedicated right turn late with overlap phasing, in addition to the existing left turn lane and one through lane. ▪ Eastbound approach: Retain existing two through lanes and defacto right turn lane. ▪ Westbound approach: Retain existing two through lanes and defacto right turn lane.

The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-8 Day Street/Eucalyptus Avenue (#12): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay fees for the TUMF program which includes modification of this intersection to provide a dedicated right turn lane with overlap phasing on the northbound approach. The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-9 Day Street/Cottonwood Avenue (#13): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to complete the following improvements:
▪ Eastbound approach: Widen Cottonwood Avenue to provide a separate right turn lane, in addition to the existing left turn lane and one through lane. ▪ Westbound approach: Provide overlap phasing for the existing right turn lane. ▪ The Project applicant will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 48
JANUARY 2026
MM-TRAF-10 Day Street/Alessandro Boulevard (#15): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay the Project’s fair share of the cost to complete the following improvements:
▪ Northbound approach: Modify striping to provide a second through lane, in addition to the existing left turn lane and through lane.
▪ Southbound approach: Widen Day Street to provide a dedicated right turn lane. ▪ Westbound approach: Modify striping and existing raised median to provide a second left turn lane and widen Alessandro Boulevard to provide a third receiving lane. ▪ The Project developer will enter into an agreement with the City of Moreno Valley to complete these improvements if required by the City.

MM-TRAF-11 Valley Springs Parkway/Driveway 5 (#23): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay for and install a traffic signal. Intersection geometries will be constructed as described in Section 4.11.5, Project Design Features that Will Reduce Impacts.

MM-TRAF-12 Canyon Park Drive – Driveway 7/Gateway Drive (#25): Prior to opening the Project for operation, the Project developer shall pay for and install a traffic signal. Intersection geometries will be constructed as described in Section 4.11.5, Project Design Features that Will Reduce Impacts.

MM-TRAF-13 Prior to design approval of the helistop by the City of Riverside Planning Department, the developer/applicant shall submit plans to the March ARB Air Traffic Control for review and approval of plans related to the proposed helistop location and proposed helicopter flight path alignments to ensure no conflicts occur between the proposed helicopter flight paths and March ARB flight operations. A copy of the approved plans from March ARB Air Traffic Control shall be submitted to the City of Riverside Planning Department. A letter of agreement shall be developed between March ARB Air Traffic Control and the Canyon Springs Healthcare Campus operator. The letter of agreement will define specific flight paths and communication procedures for helicopter operations to and from the hospital. The Canyon Springs Healthcare Campus operator will require all helicopter operators using the helistop to sign the letter of agreement.

MM-TRAF-14 Prior to helistop approval by the City of Riverside Planning Commission/City Council, the following agency actions will be required with regards to the design, construction, and operation of the helistop:
▪ An FAA Form 7460-1 will be submitted.
▪ An airspace study by FAA staff per Part 157, Notice of Landing Area Proposal, of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). This study results in an “airspace determination letter.” ▪ Project review and finding of consistency with the March ARB/Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan by Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission as required by California Public Utilities Code.
▪ Application for and receipt of Heliport Site Approval Permit from Caltrans Division of Aeronautics authorizing heliport construction.
▪ After construction of the helipad a final inspection and approval of a Heliport Permit authorizing flight operations by Caltrans Division of Aeronautics.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 49
JANUARY 2026

3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to tribal cultural resources were discussed on pages 4.4-26 through 4.4-28 of the Draft EIR. Based on consultation with multiple tribes, mitigation measures MM-CUL-1 through MM-CUL-4 were included to ensure that impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
See Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, for the text of mitigation measures MM-CUL-1 through MM-CUL-4.

3.19 Utilities and Service Systems
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
Potential impacts related to utilities and service systems were analyzed in the Draft EIR on pages 4.12-10 through

4.12-14 and 5-28 through 5-30. The EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant impacts to the construction or expansion of water or wastewater treatment facilities, the construction or expansion of stormwater drainage facilities, wastewater treatment capacity, and compliance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The EIR also concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated to water supply by implementing mitigation measures MMUTL-1 and MM-AQ-3, and to solid waste by implementing mitigation measures MM-UTL-2 and MM-UTL-3. Finally, the EIR concluded that cumulative impacts to utilities and service systems will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

The mitigation measures identified below would continue to be implemented during all development within the CSHC SP. No further analysis is required.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 50
JANUARY 2026
Applicable Mitigation Measures from CSHC SP EIR
See Section 3.3, Air Quality, for the text of mitigation measure MM-AQ-3.

MM-UTL-1 The developer/applicant of the Project shall be required to meet with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) staff to develop a plan of service, which shall detail water, wastewater, and recycled water requirements to serve the Project.

MM-UTL-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer/applicant shall complete a Construction Waste Recycling Plan and submit the plan to the Riverside County Waste Management Department (RCWMD) for approval. The plan shall identify and estimate the materials to be recycled during construction and demolition activities and shall specify where and how the recyclable materials will be stored on the Project site. Compliance with the plan shall be a requirement in all construction contracts. The RCWMD-approved plan shall be attached to all construction plans and distributed to all construction contractors. Once construction is complete, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for preparing a Waste Recycling Report that demonstrates that the Project recycled a minimum of 50% of its construction and demolition waste. The waste recycling report must be submitted to, and approved by, the RCWMD prior to issuance of occupancy permits.

MM-UTL-3 Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer/applicant shall submit building plans to the Riverside County Waste Management Department (RCWMD) and obtain approval from the RCWMD for compliance with the Riverside County Design Guidelines for Refuse and Recyclables Collection and Loading Areas, which include specifications for recyclable storage space, location and access, signage, protection and security, compatibility, and overall compliance with federal, state, and local laws.

3.20 Wildfire
CSHC SP EIR Analysis Summary
While wildfire was not a topic on the CEQA Appendix G checklist at the time the CSHC SP EIR was prepared and certified, it has since been added to the checklist. However, as noted on page 4.6-1 of the Draft EIR, the IS/NOP concluded that potential impacts related to the potential for wildland fires were found to have a less-than-significant impact and were therefore not discussed further in the Draft EIR. No mitigation was required.

Land Swap Project Analysis
The proposed Land Swap Project would transfer equal acreage between the CSHC SP and the CSBP SP. All affected parcels were assumed for full development, whether under the CSHC SP or the CSBP SP. Therefore, the proposed Land Swap Project would not be expected to increase the amount and extent of land development beyond what was assumed in the certified EIR. Therefore, there is no evidence that the proposed Land Swap Project would result in any new or different impacts related to wildfire, from those previously discussed in the certified EIR. A review of Riverside County Fire Department’s proposed 2025 Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSV) Map shows that the proposed Land Swap Project site is not within the Very High, High, or Moderate FHSZs (Riverside County Fire Department 2026). For the reasons discussed herein, no further analysis is required. 18610 51
JANUARY 2026
4 Conclusion
As demonstrated by the analysis and discussion above, impacts associated with the proposed Land Swap Project would be similar to or less than the impacts identified in the certified EIR for the Approved Project. The Land Swap Project would not create substantial changes that would require major revisions of the certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. In addition, no change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance has become available relative to any of the environmental topic categories that would result in new or more severe significant environmental impacts related to the Land Swap Project. Furthermore, the applicable mitigation measures incorporated into the certified EIR would continue to be implemented under the Land Swap Project. All Land Swap Project impacts would be within the significance determination disclosed in the certified EIR, and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 requiring a subsequent or supplemental would occur. Therefore, the Land Swap Project would not create any potential adverse impacts beyond those evaluated within the certified EIR. As such, the preparation of this Addendum to modify the Approved Project would be appropriate and fully complies with the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15164.

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 52
JANUARY 2026

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
18610 53
JANUARY 2026
5 References and Preparers

5.1 References Cited
Riverside County Fire Department. 2026. 2025 Proposed LRA online mapping tool. Accessed January 2026.

Available: https://www.rvcfire.org/our-departments/fire-marshal/FHSZ-map Wood Rodgers. 2025. Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Project Focused Traffic Analysis Memorandum.

Riverside, California. Memorandum from Pranesh Tarikere, TE, Wood Rodgers to Matt Reid, TDA Investment Group. October 29, 2025.

5.2 List of Preparers
City of Riverside
Veronica Hernandez, Senior Planner
TDA Investment Group (Applicant)
Matthew Reid, Chief Development Officer
Ware Malcomb (Figures)
Jinger Tapia, Architect, NCARB
Wood Rodgers (Transportation/Traffic)
Pranesh Tarikere, TE, Senior Engineer
Dudek (CEQA)
Corinne Resha, J.D., Project Manager
Jessica Booth, Environmental Planner
Curtis Battle, GIS Specialist
Darlene Alilain-Horn, Publications Specialist

ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT / CANYON SPRINGS LAND SWAP PROJECT 18610 54
JANUARY 2026

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Appendix A
Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Project Focused
Traffic Analysis Memorandum

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Focused Traffic Analysis Memo 1 of 3 Memorandum
To: Matt Reid
Chief Development Office
TDA Investment Group
2025 Pioneer Court
San Mateo, CA 94403
From: Pranesh Tarikere, TE
Date: October 29, 2025
Subject: Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Project Focused Traffic Analysis Memorandum, Riverside, CA

INTRODUCTION
This memorandum has been prepared to present the results of a Focused Traffic Analysis Study for the proposed Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Project (Project) located in Riverside County, CA (County). The purpose of this Focused Traffic Analysis is to assess the potential traffic impacts from the proposed land swap of approximately 3.9 acres between Canyon Springs Healthcare Specific Plan (CSHC SP) and the Canyon Springs Business Park Specific Plan (CSBP SP). The land swap will be for similar land use and as such the traffic analysis is focused on the evaluation of the operations at the proposed access driveways for Senior Housing parcel located at the southern corner of the Campus Parkway & Corporate Centre Place intersection.

The Project proposes to remove 72 senior housing units from Site B and place them on Site A along the south side of Campus Parkway between Corporate Centre Place and Canyon Park Drive. As such there is no net change in the trip generation for the campus.

Site access for the new Project location would be provided via Corporate Centre Place approximately 170 feet south of Campus Parkway (Project Driveway 1), Campus Parkway approximately 315 feet east of Corporate Centre Place (Project Driveway 2). Previously approved driveway on Canyon Park Drive approximately 130 feet south of Campus Parkway (Project Driveway 3) will remain unchanged. The Project site is identified in the site plan contained in Attachment A.

The purpose of this Focused Traffic Analysis Study is to provide an updated Project traffic analysis at the Corporate Center Place & Campus Parkway intersection and two (2) project driveways near the Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway intersection. This study includes the following:
• Project Trip Generation and Distribution
• Project Effects on Corporate Center Place & Campus Parkway and Project Driveways 1 and 2 • Conclusion

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
The trip generation data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, was used to approximate the number of trips generated by the Project. Table 1 and Table 2 show the Project trip generation rates and estimates, respectively.

The Senior Adult Housing Single-Family Detached Unit (SFU) ITE land use category code 251 for residential development was used to represent the project.

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Focused Traffic Analysis Memo 2 of 3 Table 1. Trip Generation Rates
Land Use ITE
Code Units Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Rate In Out Rate
Senior Adult Housing SFU 251 DU2 4.16 34% 66% 0.24 61% 39% 0.29 Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) fitted curve equations or average rates. 2DU = Dwelling Unit
Table 2. Trip Generation Estimate - Site A Senior Housing Additional Units Land Use ITE
Code Quantity Units Daily1
AM Peak Hour1 PM Peak Hour1
In Out Total In Out Total
Senior Adult Housing
SFU 251 72 DU2 300 6 11 17 13 8 21
Notes:
1Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (12th Edition) average rate equations. 2DU = Dwelling Units
As shown in Table 2, the Project is estimated to generate a total of 300 daily trips, 17 AM Peak Hour Trips (6 Inbound, 11 Outbound), and 21 PM Peak Hour Trips (13 Inbound, 8 Outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions.

PROJECT EFFECTS ON CORPORATE CENTRE PLACE & CAMPUS PARKWAY AND PROJECT DRIVEWAY 1 AND 2
Level of Service (LOS) was evaluated under Existing and Existing With Project conditions at the following intersections:
• Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway
• Corporate Centre Place & Project Driveway 1
• Project Driveway 2 & Campus Parkway
An estimated Project trip distribution was determined based on peak hour intersection traffic counts collected at the Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway intersection on October 7, 2025 (included in Attachment B), travel patterns, knowledge of the area, and engineering judgement. Table 3 shows the estimated Project trip distribution at the intersection of Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway.

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Focused Traffic Analysis Memo 3 of 3 Table 3. Project Trip Distribution Percentage
Roadway Segment
Distribution
Corporate Centre Place North of Campus Parkway 35%
Campus Parkway
East of Canyon Park Drive 30%
West of Corporate Centre
Place
35%
Peak hour Level of Service (LOS) at the study intersections are summarized for Existing and Existing With Proposed Project conditions in Table 4.

Table 4. Existing With Proposed Project Intersection Operations # Intersection Control
Type
LOS
Criteria
Peak
Hour
Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project
Conditions
Delay
(sec/veh)2
LOS Wrnt
Met?3
Delay
(sec/veh)2
LOS Wrnt
Met?3
1 Corporate Centre Place & Campus
Parkway AWSC1 D
AM 8.7 A No 8.8 A No
PM 10.5 B No 11.4 B No
2 Corporate Centre Place & Project
Driveway 1 OWSC1 D
AM - - - 8.9 A No
PM - - - 9.3 A No
3 Project Driveway 2 & Campus
Parkway OWSC1 D
AM - - - 9.9 A No
PM - - - 12.2 B No
Notes: Bold values indicate unacceptable LOS.
1 AWSC = All-Way Stop-Controlled, OWSC = One-Way Stop-Controlled 2 For AWSC intersections, average intersection delay is reported. For OWSC, the worst approach/movement delay and LOS is reported. 3 Wrnt Met? = Peak Hour Signal Warrant #3
As shown in Table 4, all study intersections operate at acceptable LOS (LOS B or better) conditions under AM and PM peak hour conditions with the Project in place. Signal warrants are shown to be unmet at all unsignalized intersections. Synchro software intersection LOS output reports and CAMUTCD Signal Warrants are included in Attachment C.

CONCLUSION
The Project consists of moving 72 units from its previous Site B to Site A located south of the Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway intersection. The Project is estimated to generate a total of 300 daily trips, 17 AM Peak Hour Trips (6 Inbound, 11 Outbound), and 21 PM Peak Hour Trips (13 Inbound, 8 Outbound) under typical weekday traffic demand conditions
Based on the trip generation and distribution for the Project, the Corporate Centre Place & Campus Parkway intersection and both new Project Driveways are expected to operate at acceptable LOS (LOS B or better) conditions under AM and PM peak hour conditions with the Project in place.

Canyon Springs Healthcare Focused Traffic Analysis Memo

ATTACHMENT A

PROJECT SITE MAP

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Focused Traffic Analysis Memo

ATTACHMENT B

TRAFFIC COUNTS
File Name : RIV_CC_Cam AM
Site Code : 24025967
Start Date : 10/7/2025
Page No : 1
City of Riverside
N/S: Corporate Center Place
E/W: Campus Parkway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Corporate Center Place
Southbound
Campus Parkway
Westbound
Corporate Center Place
Northbound
Campus Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 1 2 4 9 4 17 0 15 1 16 3 7 2 12 47
07:15 AM 2 1 3 6 2 13 5 20 0 14 1 15 1 20 1 22 63
07:30 AM 3 5 2 10 6 18 5 29 1 9 3 13 1 12 4 17 69
07:45 AM 5 4 1 10 5 20 7 32 0 15 4 19 4 8 0 12 73
Total 10 11 7 28 17 60 21 98 1 53 9 63 9 47 7 63 252
08:00 AM 2 7 1 10 10 18 3 31 1 16 9 26 2 11 0 13 80
08:15 AM 4 14 3 21 6 22 6 34 3 19 7 29 2 15 4 21 105
08:30 AM 4 8 4 16 10 20 4 34 0 22 12 34 8 19 0 27 111
08:45 AM 6 11 3 20 7 27 9 43 1 24 19 44 2 23 1 26 133
Total 16 40 11 67 33 87 22 142 5 81 47 133 14 68 5 87 429 Grand Total 26 51 18 95 50 147 43 240 6 134 56 196 23 115 12 150 681 Apprch % 27.4 53.7 18.9 20.8 61.2 17.9 3.1 68.4 28.6 15.3 76.7 8 Total % 3.8 7.5 2.6 14 7.3 21.6 6.3 35.2 0.9 19.7 8.2 28.8 3.4 16.9 1.8 22 Corporate Center Place
Southbound
Campus Parkway
Westbound
Corporate Center Place
Northbound
Campus Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 2 7 1 10 10 18 3 31 1 16 9 26 2 11 0 13 80
08:15 AM 4 14 3 21 6 22 6 34 3 19 7 29 2 15 4 21 105
08:30 AM 4 8 4 16 10 20 4 34 0 22 12 34 8 19 0 27 111
08:45 AM 6 11 3 20 7 27 9 43 1 24 19 44 2 23 1 26 133
Total Volume 16 40 11 67 33 87 22 142 5 81 47 133 14 68 5 87 429 % App. Total 23.9 59.7 16.4 23.2 61.3 15.5 3.8 60.9 35.3 16.1 78.2 5.7 PHF .667 .714 .688 .798 .825 .806 .611 .826 .417 .844 .618 .756 .438 .739 .313 .806 .806 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : RIV_CC_Cam AM
Site Code : 24025967
Start Date : 10/7/2025
Page No : 2
City of Riverside
N/S: Corporate Center Place
E/W: Campus Parkway
Weather: Clear
Corporate Center Place
Campus Parkway
Campus Parkway
Corporate Center Place
Right
11 Thru
40 Left
16 Out In Total
117 67 184
Right
22 Thru
87 Left
33 Out Total In
131 142 273
Left
5 Thru
81 Right
47 Out In Total
78 133 211
Left
14 Thru
68 Right
5 Total Out In
103 87 190
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM
+0 mins. 2 7 1 10 10 18 3 31 1 16 9 26 2 11 0 13
+15 mins. 4 14 3 21 6 22 6 34 3 19 7 29 2 15 4 21
+30 mins. 4 8 4 16 10 20 4 34 0 22 12 34 8 19 0 27
+45 mins. 6 11 3 20 7 27 9 43 1 24 19 44 2 23 1 26
Total Volume 16 40 11 67 33 87 22 142 5 81 47 133 14 68 5 87 % App. Total 23.9 59.7 16.4 23.2 61.3 15.5 3.8 60.9 35.3 16.1 78.2 5.7 PHF .667 .714 .688 .798 .825 .806 .611 .826 .417 .844 .618 .756 .438 .739 .313 .806 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : RIV_CC_Cam PM
Site Code : 24025967
Start Date : 10/7/2025
Page No : 1
City of Riverside
N/S: Corporate Center Place
E/W: Campus Parkway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Corporate Center Place
Southbound
Campus Parkway
Westbound
Corporate Center Place
Northbound
Campus Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 9 20 8 37 10 32 13 55 6 33 24 63 2 43 5 50 205 04:15 PM 19 15 11 45 16 39 19 74 3 32 19 54 2 35 2 39 212 04:30 PM 15 21 5 41 11 48 15 74 7 30 15 52 7 45 10 62 229 04:45 PM 22 11 5 38 13 33 10 56 4 22 15 41 13 43 3 59 194 Total 65 67 29 161 50 152 57 259 20 117 73 210 24 166 20 210 840 05:00 PM 13 20 5 38 19 47 12 78 2 25 22 49 4 39 6 49 214 05:15 PM 14 22 9 45 12 42 11 65 5 17 24 46 5 47 5 57 213 05:30 PM 9 16 8 33 23 33 11 67 4 35 12 51 5 44 5 54 205 05:45 PM 17 22 9 48 12 38 24 74 2 37 16 55 5 53 2 60 237 Total 53 80 31 164 66 160 58 284 13 114 74 201 19 183 18 220 869 Grand Total 118 147 60 325 116 312 115 543 33 231 147 411 43 349 38 430 1709 Apprch % 36.3 45.2 18.5 21.4 57.5 21.2 8 56.2 35.8 10 81.2 8.8 Total % 6.9 8.6 3.5 19 6.8 18.3 6.7 31.8 1.9 13.5 8.6 24 2.5 20.4 2.2 25.2 Corporate Center Place
Southbound
Campus Parkway
Westbound
Corporate Center Place
Northbound
Campus Parkway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 13 20 5 38 19 47 12 78 2 25 22 49 4 39 6 49 214 05:15 PM 14 22 9 45 12 42 11 65 5 17 24 46 5 47 5 57 213 05:30 PM 9 16 8 33 23 33 11 67 4 35 12 51 5 44 5 54 205 05:45 PM 17 22 9 48 12 38 24 74 2 37 16 55 5 53 2 60 237 Total Volume 53 80 31 164 66 160 58 284 13 114 74 201 19 183 18 220 869 % App. Total 32.3 48.8 18.9 23.2 56.3 20.4 6.5 56.7 36.8 8.6 83.2 8.2 PHF .779 .909 .861 .854 .717 .851 .604 .910 .650 .770 .771 .914 .950 .863 .750 .917 .917 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
File Name : RIV_CC_Cam PM
Site Code : 24025967
Start Date : 10/7/2025
Page No : 2
City of Riverside
N/S: Corporate Center Place
E/W: Campus Parkway
Weather: Clear
Corporate Center Place
Campus Parkway
Campus Parkway
Corporate Center Place
Right
31 Thru
80 Left
53 Out In Total
191 164 355
Right
58 Thru
160
Left
66 Out Total In
310 284 594
Left
13 Thru
114
Right
74 Out In Total
164 201 365
Left
19 Thru
183
Right
18 Total Out In
204 220 424
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 13 20 5 38 19 47 12 78 6 33 24 63 7 45 10 62
+15 mins. 14 22 9 45 12 42 11 65 3 32 19 54 13 43 3 59
+30 mins. 9 16 8 33 23 33 11 67 7 30 15 52 4 39 6 49
+45 mins. 17 22 9 48 12 38 24 74 4 22 15 41 5 47 5 57
Total Volume 53 80 31 164 66 160 58 284 20 117 73 210 29 174 24 227 % App. Total 32.3 48.8 18.9 23.2 56.3 20.4 9.5 55.7 34.8 12.8 76.7 10.6 PHF .779 .909 .861 .854 .717 .851 .604 .910 .714 .886 .760 .833 .558 .926 .600 .915 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
Canyon Springs Healthcare Center Focused Traffic Analysis Memo

ATTACHMENT C
SYNCHRO HCM 7 LEVEL OF SERVICE REPORTS AND CAMUTCD SIGNAL WARRANTS HCM 7th AWSC
1: Corporate Centre Pl & Campus Pkwy Existing AM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.7
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 68 5 33 87 22 5 81 47 16 40 11
Future Vol, veh/h 14 68 5 33 87 22 5 81 47 16 40 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 17 84 6 41 107 27 6 100 58 20 49 14
Number of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 3 3
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.7

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3 WBLn1 WBLn2 WBLn3 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 36% 0% 100% 82% 0% 100% 57% 0% 100% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 64% 0% 0% 18% 0% 0% 43% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 5 54 74 14 45 28 33 58 51 16 27
LT Vol 5 0 0 14 0 0 33 0 0 16 0
Through Vol 0 54 27 0 45 23 0 58 29 0 27
RT Vol 0 0 47 0 0 5 0 0 22 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 6 67 91 17 56 34 41 72 63 20 33
Geometry Grp 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Degree of Util (X) 0.01 0.101 0.127 0.029 0.086 0.051 0.067 0.108 0.089 0.034 0.051 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.968 5.468 5.023 6.039 5.539 5.412 5.915 5.415 5.113 6.111 5.611 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 598 653 710 590 644 658 604 659 698 583 635
Service Time 3.725 3.225 2.781 3.801 3.301 3.174 3.67 3.17 2.868 3.875 3.375 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 0.103 0.128 0.029 0.087 0.052 0.068 0.109 0.09 0.034 0.052 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 8.8 8.5 9 8.8 8.5 9.1 8.8 8.4 9.1 8.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A A A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 HCM 7th AWSC
1: Corporate Centre Pl & Campus Pkwy Existing PM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 183 18 66 160 58 13 114 74 53 80 31 Future Vol, veh/h 19 183 18 66 160 58 13 114 74 53 80 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 21 199 20 72 174 63 14 124 80 58 87 34
Number of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 3 3
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.8 10.5 10.5 10.3

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3 WBLn1 WBLn2 WBLn3 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 34% 0% 100% 77% 0% 100% 48% 0% 100% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 66% 0% 0% 23% 0% 0% 52% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 13 76 112 19 122 79 66 107 111 53 53 LT Vol 13 0 0 19 0 0 66 0 0 53 0
Through Vol 0 76 38 0 122 61 0 107 53 0 53
RT Vol 0 0 74 0 0 18 0 0 58 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 14 83 122 21 133 86 72 116 121 58 58
Geometry Grp 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Degree of Util (X) 0.028 0.151 0.207 0.04 0.239 0.151 0.137 0.205 0.201 0.115 0.107 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.098 6.598 6.136 6.982 6.482 6.322 6.851 6.351 5.986 7.172 6.672 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 503 542 583 512 553 566 522 563 598 499 536
Service Time 4.858 4.358 3.895 4.737 4.237 4.078 4.604 4.104 3.739 4.932 4.432 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.153 0.209 0.041 0.241 0.152 0.138 0.206 0.202 0.116 0.108 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.1 10.5 10.5 10 11.3 10.2 10.7 10.7 10.3 10.9 10.2 HCM Lane LOS B B B A B B B B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 HCM 7th AWSC
1: Corporate Centre Pl & Campus Pkwy Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.8
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 69 6 33 90 24 6 84 47 18 41 11
Future Vol, veh/h 14 69 6 33 90 24 6 84 47 18 41 11
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 17 85 7 41 111 30 7 104 58 22 51 14
Number of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 3 3
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 8.8 8.7 8.7

HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3 WBLn1 WBLn2 WBLn3 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 37% 0% 100% 79% 0% 100% 56% 0% 100% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 63% 0% 0% 21% 0% 0% 44% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 6 56 75 14 46 29 33 60 54 18 27
LT Vol 6 0 0 14 0 0 33 0 0 18 0
Through Vol 0 56 28 0 46 23 0 60 30 0 27
RT Vol 0 0 47 0 0 6 0 0 24 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 7 69 93 17 57 36 41 74 67 22 34
Geometry Grp 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Degree of Util (X) 0.012 0.106 0.13 0.029 0.088 0.054 0.067 0.112 0.095 0.038 0.053 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.999 5.499 5.06 6.077 5.577 5.432 5.944 5.444 5.133 6.144 5.644 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 594 648 705 586 639 655 600 655 694 580 631
Service Time 3.761 3.261 2.822 3.844 3.344 3.199 3.706 3.206 2.895 3.914 3.414 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 0.106 0.132 0.029 0.089 0.055 0.068 0.113 0.097 0.038 0.054 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 8.9 8.6 9 8.9 8.5 9.1 8.9 8.4 9.2 8.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A A A A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 HCM 7th TWSC
2: Corporate Centre Pl & Project Dwy 1 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 4 133 0 2 78
Future Vol, veh/h 1 4 133 0 2 78
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 4 145 0 2 85
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 191 72 0 0 145 0
Stage 1 145 - - - - -
Stage 2 47 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 780 975 - - 1435 -
Stage 1 867 - - - - -
Stage 2 970 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 778 975 - - 1435 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 778 - - - - -
Stage 1 867 - - - - -
Stage 2 968 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 8.9 0 0.2

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 928 90 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.006 0.002 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 8.9 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Project Dwy 2 & Campus Pkwy Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 3 1 142 5 0
Future Vol, veh/h 131 3 1 142 5 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 142 3 1 154 5 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 146 0 223 73
Stage 1 - - - - 144 -
Stage 2 - - - - 79 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1434 - 745 974
Stage 1 - - - - 868 -
Stage 2 - - - - 935 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1434 - 744 974
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 744 -
Stage 1 - - - - 868 -
Stage 2 - - - - 934 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.06 9.87

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 744 - - 25 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.001 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 - - 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -
HCM 7th AWSC
1: Corporate Centre Pl & Campus Pkwy Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.4
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 185 19 66 162 60 14 116 74 56 84 31 Future Vol, veh/h 19 185 19 66 162 60 14 116 74 56 84 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 23 228 23 81 200 74 17 143 91 69 104 38
Number of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 3 3
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 3 3
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 11.7 11.4 11.4 11

HCM LOS B B B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3 WBLn1 WBLn2 WBLn3 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 34% 0% 100% 76% 0% 100% 47% 0% 100% Vol Right, % 0% 0% 66% 0% 0% 24% 0% 0% 53% 0% 0%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 14 77 113 19 123 81 66 108 114 56 56 LT Vol 14 0 0 19 0 0 66 0 0 56 0
Through Vol 0 77 39 0 123 62 0 108 54 0 56
RT Vol 0 0 74 0 0 19 0 0 60 0 0
Lane Flow Rate 17 95 139 23 152 100 81 133 141 69 69
Geometry Grp 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Degree of Util (X) 0.036 0.185 0.252 0.048 0.29 0.185 0.163 0.248 0.248 0.145 0.135 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.48 6.98 6.52 7.357 6.857 6.692 7.206 6.706 6.337 7.554 7.054 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 476 511 548 484 521 533 495 533 563 472 505
Service Time 5.262 4.762 4.302 5.138 4.638 4.473 4.982 4.482 4.114 5.341 4.841 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 0.186 0.254 0.048 0.292 0.188 0.164 0.25 0.25 0.146 0.137 HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.5 11.4 11.5 10.5 12.4 11 11.4 11.7 11.2 11.6 11 HCM Lane LOS B B B B B B B B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.7 1 0.2 1.2 0.7 0.6 1 1 0.5 0.5
HCM 7th TWSC
2: Corporate Centre Pl & Project Dwy 1 Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 2
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 3 201 0 5 164
Future Vol, veh/h 1 3 201 0 5 164
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 1 3 218 0 5 178
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 318 109 0 0 218 0
Stage 1 218 - - - - -
Stage 2 100 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 650 923 - - 1348 -
Stage 1 797 - - - - -
Stage 2 913 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 647 923 - - 1348 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 647 - - - - -
Stage 1 797 - - - - -
Stage 2 909 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 9.34 0 0.26

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 834 107 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 0.004 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) - - 9.3 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
HCM 7th TWSC
3: Project Dwy 2 & Campus Pkwy Existing Plus Project PM Peak Hour Canyon Springs Healthcare TIS Synchro 12 Report
Wood Rodgers, Inc Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 310 5 1 285 3 0
Future Vol, veh/h 310 5 1 285 3 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 337 5 1 310 3 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 342 0 497 171
Stage 1 - - - - 340 -
Stage 2 - - - - 157 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.14 - 6.84 6.94
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22 - 3.52 3.32
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1213 - 502 843
Stage 1 - - - - 693 -
Stage 2 - - - - 855 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1213 - 502 843
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 502 -
Stage 1 - - - - 693 -
Stage 2 - - - - 854 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0 0.04 12.22

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 502 - - 13 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.001 -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 12.2 - - 8 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 -
CA SIGNAL WARRANT 3 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS: "AM/PM PEAK HOUR" CONDITIONS Date: October 23, 2025 Intersection No.: 1

MAJOR MINOR
EXST_AM 229 133 NO Intersection: Corporate Centre Pl & Campus Pkwy E+P_AM 236 137 NO
EXST_PM 504 201 NO Number of lanes on MAJOR street: 2
E+P_PM 511 204 NO
BLANK1 0 0 NO Number of lanes on MINOR street: 2
BLANK2 0 0 NO
BLANK3 0 0 NO
BLANK4 0 0 NO

SCENARIO

APPROACH(ES) WARRANT
MET?
Note: Major approach is the total of both approaches. Minor approach is the highest of both approaches.
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET--HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH VPH

MAJOR STREET--TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VPH
FIGURE 4C-3 WARRANT 3 PEAK HOUR VOLUME
(CALIFORNIA MUTCD)
EXST_AM
E+P_AM
EXST_PM
E+P_PM
BLANK1
BLANK2
BLANK3
BLANK4
1 LANE & 1 LANE
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
*Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center
Riverside, CA
Wood Rodgers, Inc.
\\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs-Reno\Jobs\4670_Canyon_Springs_Healthcare\Canyon_Springs_Healthcare_OA\Traffic\Analysis\CA_MUTCDSigWarrantNo3AM_PM_WAR.xls Intx INT1
Analyst: Name
CA SIGNAL WARRANT 3 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS: "AM/PM PEAK HOUR" CONDITIONS Date: October 23, 2025 Intersection No.: 2

MAJOR MINOR
EXST_AM 211 0 NO Intersection: Corporate Centre Pl & Driveway 1 E+P_AM 213 4 NO
EXST_PM 365 0 NO Number of lanes on MAJOR street: 2
E+P_PM 370 3 NO
BLANK1 0 0 NO Number of lanes on MINOR street: 2
BLANK2 0 0 NO
BLANK3 0 0 NO
BLANK4 0 0 NO

SCENARIO

MINOR STREET--HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH VPH

Canyon Springs Healthcare Center
Riverside, CA
Wood Rodgers, Inc.
\\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs-Reno\Jobs\4670_Canyon_Springs_Healthcare\Canyon_Springs_Healthcare_OA\Traffic\Analysis\CA_MUTCDSigWarrantNo3AM_PM_WAR.xls Intx INT2
Analyst: Name
CA SIGNAL WARRANT 3 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS: "AM/PM PEAK HOUR" CONDITIONS Date: October 23, 2025 Intersection No.: 3

MAJOR MINOR
EXST_AM 273 0 NO Intersection: Driveway 2 & Campus Parkway E+P_AM 276 5 NO
EXST_PM 595 0 NO Number of lanes on MAJOR street: 2
E+P_PM 600 3 NO
BLANK1 0 0 NO Number of lanes on MINOR street: 2
BLANK2 0 0 NO
BLANK3 0 0 NO
BLANK4 0 0 NO

SCENARIO

MINOR STREET--HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH VPH

Riverside City CouncilOctober 20, 2026

Riverside City Council
October 20, 2026