Rocklin City Council
February 24, 2026

owned entities, either party may terminate this
Agreement before any subsequent year if
Customer is unable to secure funding through
the legislative or governing body’s approval
process.

3.5 Follow-on Term. If the parties enter into
another agreement substantially similar to this
Agreement for an additional term, the effective
date of the follow-on agreement will be the day
after the expiration date of this Agreement.

4.0—PRODUCT UPDATES

4.1 Future Updates. Esri reserves the right to
update the list of Products in Table A—List of
Products by providing written notice to
Customer. Customer may continue to use all
Products that have been Deployed, but support
and upgrades for deleted items may not be
available. As new Products are incorporated into
the standard program, they will be offered to
Customer via written notice for incorporation into
the Products schedule at no additional charge.

Customer’s use of new or updated Products
requires Customer to adhere to applicable
additional or revised terms and conditions in the
Master Agreement.

4.2 Product Life Cycle. During the Term of
Agreement, some Products may be retired or
may no longer be available to Deploy in the
identified quantities. Maintenance will be subject
to the individual Product Life Cycle Support
Status and Product Life Cycle Support Policy,
which can be found at
https://support.esri.com/en/other-
resources/product-life-cycle. Updates for
Products in the mature and retired phases may
not be available. Customer may continue to use
Products already Deployed, but Customer will
not be able to Deploy retired Products.

5.0—MAINTENANCE

The Fee includes standard maintenance benefits
during the Term of Agreement as specified in the
most current applicable Esri Maintenance and
Support Program document (found at
https://www.esri.com/en-
us/legal/terms/maintenance). At Esri’s sole
discretion, Esri may make patches, hot fixes, or
updates available for download. No Software other
than the defined Products will receive Maintenance.

Customer may acquire maintenance for other
Software outside this Agreement.

a. Tier 1 Support

1. Customer will provide Tier 1 Support
through the Tier 1 Help Desk to all
Customer’s authorized users.

2. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be fully trained in
the Products.

3. At a minimum, Tier 1 Support will include
those activities that assist the user in
resolving how-to and operational questions
as well as questions on installation and
troubleshooting procedures.

4. The Tier 1 Help Desk will be the initial point
of contact for all questions and reporting of a
Case. The Tier 1 Help Desk will obtain a full
description of each reported Case and the
system configuration from the user. This
may include obtaining any customizations,
code samples, or data involved in the Case.

5. If the Tier 1 Help Desk cannot resolve the
Case, an authorized Tier 1 Help Desk
individual may contact Tier 2 Support. The
Tier 1 Help Desk will provide support in such
a way as to minimize repeat calls and make
solutions to problems available to
Customer’s organization.

6. Tier 1 Help Desk individuals are the only
individuals authorized to contact Tier 2
Support. Customer may change the Tier 1
Help Desk individuals by written notice to
Esri.

b. Tier 2 Support

1. Tier 2 Support will log the calls received
from Tier 1 Help Desk.

2. Tier 2 Support will review all information
collected by and received from the Tier 1
Help Desk including preliminary documented
troubleshooting provided by the Tier 1 Help
Desk when Tier 2 Support is required.

3. Tier 2 Support may request that Tier 1 Help
Desk individuals provide verification of
information, additional information, or
answers to additional questions to
296

supplement any preliminary information
gathering or troubleshooting performed by
Tier 1 Help Desk.

4. Tier 2 Support will attempt to resolve the
Case submitted by Tier 1 Help Desk.

5. When the Case is resolved, Tier 2 Support
will communicate the information to Tier 1
Help Desk, and Tier 1 Help Desk will
disseminate the resolution to the user(s).

6.0—ENDORSEMENT AND PUBLICITY

This Agreement will not be construed or interpreted
as an exclusive dealings agreement or Customer’s
endorsement of Products. Either party may publicize
the existence of this Agreement.

7.0—ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

7.1 OEM Licenses. Under Esri’s OEM or Solution
OEM programs, OEM partners are authorized to
embed or bundle portions of Esri products and
services with their application or service. OEM
partners’ business model, licensing terms and
conditions, and pricing are independent of this
Agreement. Customer will not seek any discount
from the OEM partner or Esri based on the
availability of Products under this Agreement.

Customer will not decouple Esri products or
services from the OEM partners’ application or
service.

7.2 Annual Report of Deployments. At each
anniversary date and ninety (90) calendar days
prior to the expiration of this Agreement,
Customer will provide Esri with a written report
detailing all Deployments. Upon request,
Customer will provide records sufficient to verify
the accuracy of the annual report.

8.0—ORDERING, ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEDURES, DELIVERY, AND

DEPLOYMENT

8.1 Orders, Delivery, and Deployment

a. Upon the Effective Date, Esri will invoice
Customer and provide Authorization Codes to
activate the nondestructive copy protection
program that enables Customer to download,
operate, or allow access to the Products. If this
is a multi-year Agreement, Esri may invoice the
Fee up to thirty (30) calendar days before the
annual anniversary date for each year.

b. Undisputed invoices will be due and payable
within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of
invoice. Esri reserves the right to suspend
Customer’s access to and use of Products if
Customer fails to pay any undisputed amount
owed on or before its due date. Esri may charge
Customer interest at a monthly rate equal to the
lesser of one percent (1.0%) per month or the
maximum rate permitted by applicable law on
any overdue fees plus all expenses of collection
for any overdue balance that remains unpaid
ten (10) days after Esri has notified Customer of
the past-due balance.

c. Esri’s federal ID number is 95-2775-732.

d. If requested, Esri will ship backup media to the
ship-to address identified on the Ordering
Document, FOB Destination, with shipping
charges prepaid. Customer acknowledges that
should sales or use taxes become due as a
result of any shipments of tangible media, Esri
has a right to invoice and Customer will pay any
such sales or use tax associated with the receipt
of tangible media.

8.2 Order Requirements. Esri does not require
Customer to issue a purchase order. Customer
may submit a purchase order in accordance with
its own process requirements, provided that if
Customer issues a purchase order, Customer
will submit its initial purchase order on the
Effective Date. If this is a multi-year Agreement,
Customer will submit subsequent purchase
orders to Esri at least thirty (30) calendar days
before the annual anniversary date for each
year.

a. All orders pertaining to this Agreement will be
processed through Customer’s centralized point
of contact.

b. The following information will be included in
each Ordering Document:

(1) Customer name; Esri customer number, if
known; and bill-to and ship-to addresses
(2) Order number
(3) Applicable annual payment due

297

9.0—MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, OR

DIVESTITURES

If Customer is a commercial entity, Customer will
notify Esri in writing in the event of (i) a
consolidation, merger, or reorganization of Customer
with or into another corporation or entity;
(ii) Customer’s acquisition of another entity; or (iii) a transfer or sale of all or part of Customer’s
organization (subsections i, ii, and iii, collectively
referred to as “Ownership Change”). There will be
no decrease in Fee as a result of any Ownership
Change.

9.1 If an Ownership Change increases the
cumulative program count beyond the maximum
level for this Agreement, Esri reserves the right
to increase the Fee or terminate this Agreement
and the parties will negotiate a new agreement.

9.2 If an Ownership Change results in transfer or
sale of a portion of Customer’s organization, that
portion of Customer’s organization will transfer
the Products to Customer or uninstall, remove,
and destroy all copies of the Products.

9.3 This Agreement may not be assigned to a
successor entity as a result of an Ownership
Change unless approved by Esri in writing in
advance. If the assignment to the new entity is
not approved, Customer will require any
successor entity to uninstall, remove, and
destroy the Products. This Agreement will
terminate upon such Ownership Change.

298
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Rocklin Road/I-80 Interchange Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Community Identification Sign
Date:

February 24, 2026
Submitted By:

Kristen Van Groningen, Associate Civil Engineer
David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Director
Department:

Community Development
Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving the Transportation Art/Community Identification Proposal for an Identification Sign on the Rocklin Road/I-80 Interchange Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing and Authorizing City Staff to Submit the Proposal to the Caltrans District 3 Transportation Art Coordinator for Preliminary Approval.

Background:

In 2020 a project design team investigated a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) configuration as an option to mitigate congestion on Rocklin Road at Interstate 80 (I-80) and enhance connectivity between Sierra College and surrounding destinations.

On November 14, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-187, approving a DDI configuration with bicycle and pedestrian (Bike/Ped) use provided by a dedicated overcrossing of I-80. The project (Project No. 50162) design includes the installation of a Community Identification Sign on both sides of the new overcrossing.

Community Identification Signs serve as visual gateways to cities by enhancing community pride, increasing visibility, and promoting recognition among residents, businesses, and visitors. When located within the freeway right-of-way, such features are subject to Caltrans approval and must comply with established design, safety, and long-term maintenance requirements.

Once Caltrans provides preliminary approval of the proposal for a sign, they will work to draft a Maintenance Agreement between the City and Caltrans for the on-going maintenance of the sign and the bike/ped overcrossing. It is anticipated that the Maintenance Agreement will take several months to prepare, and staff will return to the City Council at a later date to seek the adoption of the Maintenance Agreement and authorization to submit the final Community Identification Sign proposal documents.

Item Number C8.

299
An overview of the Community Identification Sign as a public art component and its alignment with the Arts Commission Goal #3 of expanding public art throughout the city, was presented to the City of Rocklin Arts Commission (Commission) on January 26, 2026. Following discussion, the Commission voted 5-0 to support the proposal.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the Transportation Art/Community Identification Proposal.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the staff recommendation.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Draft Transportation Art Community Identification Proposal 300
Resolution No. 2026- February 24, 2026 Page 1 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING THE TRANSPORTATION ART/COMMUNITY

IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL FOR AN IDENTIFICATION SIGN ON THE ROCKLIN ROAD/I-80 INTERCHANGE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN

OVERCROSSING AND AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO SUBMIT THE
PROPOSALTO THE CALTRANS DISTRICT 3 TRANSPORTATION ART

COORDINATOR FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

WHEREAS, a project design team investigated a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) configuration as an option to mitigate congestion on Rocklin Road at Interstate 80 and enhance connectivity between Sierra College and surrounding destinations; and

WHEREAS, on November 19, 2023 the City Council approved a DDI configuration with bicycle and pedestrian use provided by a dedicated overcrossing of Interstate 80; and

WHEREAS, on January 26, 2026, the City of Rocklin Arts Commission voted unanimously to support the proposal; and

WHEREAS, the project design includes the insta llation of a community identification sign on both sides of the overcrossing; and

WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requires a multi-step approval process for the construction of a community identification sign , for which this is the first step.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rocklin does resolve as follows:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rocklin hereby a pproves the Transportation Art/ Community Identification Proposal for an identification sign on the Rocklin Road/I -80 Interchange Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Rocklin authorizes City staff to submit the aforementioned sign proposal to the Caltrans District 3 Transportation Art Coordinator for preliminary approval.

301
Resolution No. 2026- February 24, 2026 Page 2 of 2
1 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

_________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk
302
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL
INSTRUCTIONS - Preliminary Request

 Complete the Transportation Art Proposal Cover Sheet and submit along with other documents required for the Preliminary Request to the District Transportation Art Coordinator.

Enter information in gray text fields, picture content boxes and check boxes as instructed.  Applicants must be a local public agency. The local public agency may be a city, county, incorporated town, tribal government, or non-federally recognized tribe representing the area in which the transportation art or community identification will be installed. The proposal must be completed in its entirety and signed by an official who is authorized by the local public agency to commit the required resources for the funding, installation, and maintenance of the proposed project.
 Describe the specific location for the proposed transportation art or community identification. Provide electronic copies of location map or an aerial photograph, as well as photographs that depict existing site conditions of the location.
 Provide a brief description of the proposed transportation art or community identification. Include drawings, sketches, and photographic simulations of a sufficient size and resolution to adequately demonstrate overall composition of the proposed transportation art or community identification in context with the proposed location. Additional information may be requested by the District Transportation Art Coordinator (DTAC) to adequately evaluate the suitability for installation on or within the State right-of-way.  All transportation art or community identification with an art component will require a Copyright License and Moral Rights Waiver in the Artwork Agreement (CLAW). A link to the blank template of the CLAW can be found under the "Copyright License and Waiver of Moral Rights in the Artwork Agreement" section, elsewhere in this proposal.
 All Transportation Art/Community Identification proposals will require a fully executed Local Agency/Artist Agreement (LAA). Provide a copy of the draft Local Agency/Artist Agreement (LAA) with the requisite terms prior to its execution.
 Place letter title and description of attachment at the top left corner of the first page (i.e. - "Attachment A - Location Map")

303
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL
CHECKLIST - Preliminary Request

Include the following information with the Conceptual Transportation Art/Community Identification Request:
 Cover Sheet
 Checklist - Preliminary Request
 Preliminary Request and Attachments:

Attachment- Location/Aerial Map
Attachment- Preliminary Transportation Art/Community Identification Description Attachment- Draft Local Agency/Artist Agreement with the required terms (if available)

 = Required Documents

304
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

PRELIMINARY REQUEST

(Add text and images or enter "SEE ATTACMENT - xx" or "N/A" if "Not applicable")

 LOCATION MAP:

Provide a map or satellite map (i.e., Google Earth image) and indicate proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification location.

The project is located in the City of Rocklin, at the interchange of I-80 and Rocklin Road.  Transportation Art/Community Identification Description:

Provide a brief written description of the proposal, including a description of existing site conditions, and proposed imagery of the final Transportation Art/Community Identification. If proposal is Community Identification, provide the proposed text to be included.

The existing site conditions at the Rocklin Rd interchange do not include a pedestrian bridge.

There is a h ighly developed landscape that includes boulders and a signage wall facing the eastbound offramp that says "ROCKLIN". This wall will be removed for the new offramp.

The proposed Commuity Identification consists of a sign that is constructed on a new pedestrian overcrossing above I-80. The sign consists of text stating "ROCKLIN CALIFORNIA" which is centered over the interstate . Graphic figures representing boulders are located on either side of the text. The text and figures are framed by a steel arched beam of 12' height above the bridge deck and 80' length. The outside edge o f the boulders on the edge of the sign are a maximum of 84' apart. The text is 4' ("ROCKLIN") and 1.5' ("CALIFORNIA") height and t he boulders are 11.6' max height above the bridge deck. The text and figures will be attached to 305
Revised (08-30-2023)

chain link fence mesh that is installed on vertical post s. The posts connect to the arched steel beam. There will be light poles placed on alternating sides of the bridge . The sides of the sign will connect to a typical bridge railing fence of 7' height. The sign is located on both sides of the bridge, facing both the eastbound and westbound lanes.

Preliminary drawing of bridge elevation with labels and dimensions.

Preliminary cross section of
pedestrian overcrossing and sign
attachment.

306
Revised (08-30-2023)

Color rendering of the bridge elevation showing sign text, boulders, steel arched beam, fence posts, chain link mesh, handrail, and lighting.

NOTE: Transportation Art/Community Identification located on existing State-owned concrete structures will be allowed for non -load bearing members first, such as wingwalls abutments , sound walls , etc . Load bearing structures such as columns, piers, bridge soffits, girders, etc., may be proposed but will require approval from the Caltrans Office of Structure Maintenance and Investigation (SMI).

Transportation Art or Community Identification proposed on steel structures is prohibited, unless approved by SMI.

 Draft Local Agency/Artist Agreement or Contract:

If available, provide a copy of the draft agreement(s) between the public agency and the artist(s) pertaining to but not limited to the design, installation, operation, maintenance, and/or removal of the Transportation Art/Community Identification. The Local Agency/Artist agreement (LAA) must include, without conflicting terms, language regarding ownership of the artwork by Caltrans and that Caltrans shall have license to make certain noncommercial uses of the [Artwork]. See the section " Copyright License and Waver of Moral Rights in the Artwork" elsewhere in this TAP for the requisite terms to be included.

If the Local Agency/Artist agreement (LAA) has already been executed with the Artist, provide the executed Local Agency agreement and either a proposed or executed amendment to the Local Agency agreement that includes the above provision and removes any conflicting terms.

307
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL
INSTRUCTIONS - Proposal

 When conditional approval of the Preliminary Request is provided by the District Transportation Art Coordinator (DTAC), continue with the remaining Transportation Art Proposal (TAP) requirements following these instructions. Enter information in gray text fields, picture content boxes and check boxes as instructed.  Complete guidance for Transportation Art/Community Identification Program and requirements for preparing the Transportation Art/Community Identification Proposal can be found at the Caltrans - Landscape Architecture and Community Livability Elements web site.  Submit a copy of the preliminary TAP for review to the DTAC. The TAP must include resolution, support documents, drawings, sketches, and photographic simulations of sufficient size and resolution to demonstrate the overall composition of the proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification in context with the proposed location. Keep maximum size of all submitted files under 20MB, or they may not be received.

Additional information may be requested by the DTAC to adequately evaluate the suitability for installation on or within the State right-of-way.
 Place letter title and/or description of all attachments at the top left corner of the first page (i.e. - "Attachment A - Resolution and Community Support" or "Location Map")  Include a completed draft of Copyright License and Moral Rights Waiver in the Arts Agreement (CLAW), along with the required exhibits, including a copy of the Local Agency/Artist Agreement (LAA) with the requisite term s, for review. DO NOT SIGN - The DTAC will use this information to complete the CLAW and will send it to the Local Agency and artist for final review and signature.  Include a completed draft of the Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement (TAMA) along with the required exhibits for review. Contact the DTAC to coordinate with the District Maintenance Agreements Office if there are any proposed changes to the TAMA. DO NOT SIGN - The DMAC will use this information to complete the TAMA and will send it to the Local Agency final review and signature  Address all comments from the draft Transportation Art/Community Identification Proposal submittal, the CLAW and the TAMA. Once the final TAP and agreements are all completed, the DTAC and DMAC will prepare the final documents as Adobe PDF files for e-Signature by the Local Agency and artist.  DO NOT SIGN the Transportation Art/Community Identification Proposal - Applicant Certification until the DTAC verifies all information in the TAP is complete and ready for e-Signature.  When the complete TAP, CLAW and TAMA are finalized and approved, coordinate with the DTAC to prepare the Caltrans Encroachment Permit Administrative permit application to the Caltrans District Encroachment Permit Office (CDEPO) for processing. Provide any additional information and clearances requested by the Permits Office before approval of the encroachment permit. Please see Encroachment Permit submittal requirements at - Caltrans - Encroachment Permits.

An encroachment permit will not be issued until the final TAP, CLAW and TAMA are signed and approved.

308
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

COVER SHEET

LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY SPONSOR
City of Rocklin

STAND ALONE PROJECT
ASSOCIATED WITH A PROJECT (No.: 03-2F960)
(Check applicable box)
OFFICIAL PROJECT NAME (ARTWORK NAME): Rocklin Road POC Sign LOCATION (CITY): Rocklin (COUNTY): Placer
ROUTE No.: 80 POST MILE: 6.09 BRIDGE No.: TBD CROSS STREET: Rocklin Road (Contact Caltrans District Art Coordinator to provide post mile and Bridge No. information)

PUBLIC AGENCY RESPONSIBLE CONTACT
NAME: Chris Ladeas
TITLE: Acting City Engineer
ADDRESS: 3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
TELEPHONE: 916-625-5581 EMAIL: [email protected]

NATURE OF ARTWORK

MURAL (PAINTING)

STATUE OR SCULPTURE
MOSAIC

LIGHTING
OTHER (Explain) Sign
(Check applicable box)

PROPOSED INSTALLATION DATE: 2026

PERMANENT INSTALLATION
(Maximum life span before renewal or restoration
work is needed – 40 years )

TEMPORARY INSTALLATION
(Removal Date):
(Caltrans Office Use)
PERMIT ENGINEERING EVALUATION REPORT (PEER) REQUIRED: YES NO (If "Yes,” see Attachment K)

309
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
(Insert local public agency sponsor name in gray fields where required) I certify that the City of Rocklin approves of the proposed transportation art or community identification project and is the responsible public agency representing the community where the transportation art or community identific ation will be installed. The City of Rocklin will adhere to and remain in compliance with Caltrans' Project Development Procedures Manual guidelines and all other related rules and restrictions Caltrans may apply to the Transportation Art or Community Identification project, including:
 All costs associated with the design, engineering, testing, construction, and installation of the proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification, including labor, materials, supplies, and traffic control, maintenance, and removal shall be borne by the applicant.  Obtaining and documenting local community support and acceptance for the Transportation Art/Community Identification project.
 Executing Transportation Art M aintenance Agreement ( TAMA) with Caltrans detailing the regular maintenance and repair tasks of the Transportation Art/Community Identification, including potential removal at the end of its projected lifespan, or when requested by Caltrans, and returning the site to a condition as good as or better than at the start of the project.  Providing a Local Agency Agreement (LAA) containing indemnification language acceptable to Caltrans, between the City of Rocklin and the artist(s).  Providing the name(s) and current contact information of each responsible person who will be working within the State right -of-way to install, maintain, rehabilitate, or remove the Transportation Art/Community Identification.

By signing below, I confirm that I have the authority to act as the binding signatory for the City of Rocklin and that the statements above are true to the best of my knowledge.

SIGNATURE: DATE:

PRINT NAME: TITLE:

TRANSPORTATION ART PROPOSAL APPROVAL
SIGNATURE:

PRINT NAME: Title: DATE:

310
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL CHECKLIST

Please prepare the Transportation Art / Community Identification Proposal as follows:
 Cover Sheet
 Applicant Certification
 Checklist - Proposal
 Proposal and Attachments:

Attachment A - Public Agency Resolution and Documentation of Community Support Attachment B - Images of Existing Location and Proposed Artwork Attachment C - Artists' Resume´
Attachment D - Cost Estimate & Breakdown
Attachment E - Construction Schedule
Attachment F - Materials Data and Safety Sheets
Attachment G - Traffic Management/ Control Plan
Attachment H - Water Pollution Control Plan
Attachment I - Environmental Document
Attachment J - Railroad Clearance (when required)
Attachment K - Project Engineer Evaluation Report (PEER) (when required) (Add attachments L and N as needed, e.g., "Engineering Calculations." Include description of attachment)
Attachment L -
Attachment M -
Attachment N -

 Copyright License and Moral Rights Waiver in the Arts (CLAW), including:

Exhibit A - Description of Artwork
Exhibit B - Executed Local Agency Agreement (LAA) with required terms

 Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement (TAMA), including:

Location Map
Proof of Insurance
Operations and Maintenance Manual (for artwork that is engineered or includes lighting, or when requested by the district transportation art coordinator)  = Required Documents

311
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

PROPOSAL

 Transportation Art Proposal:

A Transportation Art Proposal (TAP) is submitted by the public agency that has jurisdiction over the area where the Transportation ART/Community Identification will be installed. Public agencies should contact the Caltrans District Transportation Art Coordinator (DTAC) to develop the final qualified TAP for submittal to the District Director for approval. Transportation Art/Community Identification included as part of a capital improvement project will be reviewed and approved through the Caltrans project development process, and as directed by these guidelines

Transportation Art/ Community Identification proposals must consist of plans, specifications, artist renderings, and other required documents that are prepared by the artist, designer, licensed landscape architect, architect, or professional engineer and include the following:
(Attached required documents. Enter "SEE ATTACHED" or "N/A" if "Not applicable", where indicated to enter text)

 ARTWORK: (Description of the proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification, including a model or scaled plans, elevations, section s, details, and other information necessary to convey location, view from all sides, materials, and construction or installation methods.)

Community Name (If Community Identification Proposal):

312
Revised (08-30-2023)

Describe the proposed artwork and color scheme, paint, and protective materials, etc.

(If proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification involves lighting, provide written description of proposed lighting, including any plans, details or specifications stamped by a licensed electrical engineer.)

313
Revised (08-30-2023)

 Attachments:

Furnish the following attachments as need for the transportation art proposal. Check all that apply.

ATTACHMENT A - RESOLUTION and PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ( Documentation of local community support for the art proposal. Describe decision process and method for providing fair opportunity to express opposition or support to reach consensus)
(Provide a copy of local public agency Adopted Resolution or another official document)

ATTACHMENT B - IMAGES (EXISITNG CONDITIONS & PROPOSED ARTWORK): (Show images of aerial and ground view of existing site location before and after artwork is installed.)

ATTACHMENT C - ARTIST'S RESUME: ( Description and documentation of the artist’s work and background)

ATTACHMENT D - COST ESTIMATE: (Proposed cost estimate and cost breakdown.)

ATTACHMENT E - CONSTRUCTION / INSTALLATION SCHEDULE: (Include tentative start and end date, and construction duration.)

ATTACHMENT F - MATERIAL DATA AND SAFETY SHEETS ( Provide data sheets for all material to be used in the construction of the Transportation Art/Community Identification.)

ATTACHMENT G - TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT/CONTROL PLANS: ( Briefly describe the plan/method for closing streets and sidewalks if necessary. Include detour plans, specifications, lane closure charts and tables indicating closure times for each day of the week, stamped by a licensed engineer. Include cost estimate for this work in Attachment C.)

ATTACHMENT H - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN: (Include drawings and specifications stamped by a licensed engineer. Include cost estimate for this work in Attachment C.)

ATTACHMENT I - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (Provide Environmental clearance document.)

ATTACHMENT J - RAILROAD CLEARANCE: ( Provide railroad clearance documents if proposed Transportation Art/Community Identification is within 25 feet of railroad right of way.)

ATTACHMENT K - PERMIT ENGINEER EVALUATION REPORT (PEER): ( When required by the Caltrans District Transportation Art Coordinator, provide PEER describing and justifying nonstandard design or construction. The PEER must be stamped by a licensed engineer.)

(Add attachments L through N as needed. Include description of attachment)

ATTACHMENT L -

ATTACHMENT M -

ATTACHMENT N -

314
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

COPYRIGHT LICENSE AND WAIVER OF MORAL RIGHTS IN THE ARTWORK (Provide a copy of executed CLAW as a separate attachment, along with Exhibits A & B)

 Copyright License and Waiver or Moral Rights in the Artwork Agreement (CLAW):

Transportation art or community identification located within State highway right of way is a benefit to the people of California and will become property of the State. Prior to installation of the approved Transportation Art/Community Identification, the artist(s) and the local public agency must provide an executed Copyright License and Waiver of Moral Rights in the Artwork agreement (CLAW), conta ining terms and conditions approved by Caltrans.

The agreement will allow the artist(s) to maintain the copyright of the artwork, while Caltrans shall own the title of the artwork as well as license to make certain, noncommercial uses of the artwork.

The final executed Copyright License and Waiver of Moral Rights in the Artwork (CLAW) agreement must include the following:

EXHIBIT A - ARTWORK:

Final artwork name: The described in the Copyright License and Moral Rights Waiver in the Art work (CLAW), is incorporated by reference, and includes the following items:
 Written description of artwork, inspiration, location, and materials used  All preliminary drawings, concept sketches, illustrations, photographs, renderings, photo simulations and any other visual media created in the development of the final proposed artwork  Engineering plans, drawings, details, specifications, studies, and calculations used in the development of the final proposed artwork (when required)

Estimated Completion Date:

EXHIBIT B - LOCAL AGREEMENTS:

Provide a copy of all agreements between the public agency and the artist(s) pertaining to but not limited to the design, installation, operation, maintenance, and/or removal of the transportation art. The signed and executed Local Agency Agreement, including all the exhibits to the Local Agency Agreement . The Local Agency/Artist Agreement (LAA) must include, without conflicting terms, the following language:
[Artist] hereby agrees that title to [the Artwork] shall be owned by Caltrans and Caltrans shall have a license to make certain noncommercial uses of [the Artwork]. [Artist] acknowledges that by signing and executing the Caltrans Copyright License and Waiver of Moral Rights in Artwork agreement, which is hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this Agreement as Exhibit [__], Artist has conveyed or will convey title in [the Artwork] to Caltrans, has waived or will waive any and all moral rights to [ the Artwork], and has granted or will grant Caltrans a nonexclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, world-wide, sublicensable license to [the Artwork].

315
Revised (08-30-2023)

TRANSPORTATION ART / COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROPOSAL

TRANSPORTATION ART MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
(Caltrans will provide a draft Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement template for this section during preliminary review. Separately attach the final signed Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement before submitting the Encroachment Permit application)

 Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement (TAMA):

Prior to the issuance of the Transportation Art Maintenance Agreement (TAMA), provide a brief description of the long-term maintenance plan and schedule. Discuss regular cleaning, graffiti removal, damage repair, removal of art (if necessary), and other work as required.
(This information will be used in preparation of the final TAMA by Caltrans and provided to you for signature)

Note - For art proposal with painted murals on concrete surfaces, the t ypical expected lifespan is approximately 25 to 32 years, depending on local materials use, application method, and environmental factors. Please include as part of the maintenance plan, a description for either restoring or removing the artwork after this period. If the proposal includes lighting, describe method of removal if the lighting can no longer be maintained.

1. Provide an aerial map/satellite view of proposal location as ATTACHMENT A to the TAMA.

2. Provide a copy of the Certificate of Insurance as ATTACHMENT B to the TAMA.

3. Attach a copy of the draft Maintenance Plan or Operations and Maintenance Manual (OMM) as ATTACHMENT C to the TAMA for the completed Transportation Art /Community Identification. Describe method and materials for cleaning, graffiti removal, anti-graffiti coating application, damage repair and restoration, and any additional operation instructions or special needs for features such as lighting or other engineered feature . The OMM should also provide instruction for removal of the Transportation Art /Community Identification, for if/when removal becomes necessary.

316
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

PFA1: Rocklin Public Financing Authority's Audited Basic Financial Statements for Fiscal Year 2024/25
Date:

February 24, 2026
Submitted By:

Angela Doyle, Senior Accountant
Daniel Choe, Administrative Services Deputy Director
Department:

Administrative Services - Finance
Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority Accepting the Audited Basic Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025.

Background:

The Joint Exercise of Powers Act of the California Government Code Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 5, requires an annual audit of joint powers authorities and preparation of a report. The Rocklin Public Financing Authority (Authority) is a joint powers authority established by an agreement between the City of Rocklin and the former Rocklin Redevelopment Agency.

The Authority is governed by a Board consisting of members of the City Council. Oversight responsibility, including the ability to conduct independent financial affairs, issue debt instruments, approve budgets, and otherwise influence operations and account for fiscal matters, is exercised by the Authority’s governing board. The Authority is reported as a blended component unit of the City for financial reporting purposes, and this Basic Financial Statements report reflects the assets, liabilities, fund balances/net position, revenues, and expenditures of the Authority only.

An independent financial audit of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority, performed by the auditing firm of Chavan & Associates, LLP for the year ended June 30, 2025, has been completed. The Basic Financial Statements of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority, for the year ended June 30, 2025, have been prepared. Chavan & Associates, LLP has issued an unqualified (“clean”) auditor’s opinion.

The Audited Basic Financial Statements for the Year Ended June 30, 2025 is now presented to the Rocklin Public Financing Authority Board, for acceptance by resolution.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact from the staff recommendation.

Item Number C9.

317
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Rocklin Public Financing Authority Resolution

2. RPFA Resolution Exhibit A - FY 2024/25 RPFA Audit Report 318
Resolution No. 2026- PFA February 24, 2026 Page 1 of 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026- PFA

RESOLUTION OF THE ROCKLIN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

ACCEPTING THE AUDITED BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025

WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, California Government Code Title 1, Divisio n 7, Chapter 5, requires an annual audit of joint powers authorities and preparation of a report; and

WHEREAS, Chavan & Associates LLP performed an independent audit of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority for the year ended June 30, 202 5, and prepared Basic Financial Statements of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority; and

WHEREAS, Chavan & Associates LLP has issued an unqualified (“clean”) auditor’s opionion.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rocklin Public Financing Authority as follows:

Section 1. The audited Basic Financial S tatements for the Rocklin Public Financing Authority for fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” are accepted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of February, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Members:

NOES: Members:

ABSENT: Members:

ABSTAIN: Members:

____________________________________
David Bass, Chair

ATTEST:

____________________________
Avinta Singh, Secretary
319
Chavan & Associates, LLP
Certified Public Accountants
16450 Monterey Road #5
Morgan Hill, CA 95037

ROCKLIN PUBLIC

FINANCING AUTHORITY

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2025 AND 2024
320
This page is intentionally blank
321

ROCKLIN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 AND 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report ......................................................................................................... 1

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information) .............................. 5

Basic Financial Statements:

Government-Wide Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position .................................................................................................. 11 Statement of Activities ...................................................................................................... 12 Fund Financial Statements
Governmental Funds:

Balance Sheet .............................................................................................................. 13 Reconciliation of the Government Funds Balance Sheet
to the Government-Wide Financial Statement of Net Position .................................. 14 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ............................. 15 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities ........................................................................................... 16

Notes to the Basic Financial Statements .................................................................................. 18

OTHER INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statement Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ............................................... 31

322
This page is intentionally blank
323

FINANCIAL SECTION
324
Page | 1 16450 Monterey Road #5, Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Board of Directors of the
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Rocklin, California
Report on the audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority (the “Authority"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Authority’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Authority, as of June 30, 2025 and 2024 and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Authority and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Emphasis of a Matter
Deficit Net Position
As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Authority's net position in its Government-wide financial statements was reported at a deficit mostly because of long-term liabilities as reported in Note 3 and deferred gains from the defeasance of long-term debt. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Authority’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
325
Page | 2 16450 Monterey Road #5, Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Authority’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and GAGAS, we:
 Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.  Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
 Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
 Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
 Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Authority’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control–related matters that we identified during the audit.

Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of 326
Page | 3 16450 Monterey Road #5, Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated November 30, 2025, on our consideration of the Authority’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Authority’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

November 30, 2025
Morgan Hill, California
327
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION

AND ANALYSIS

328
Rocklin Public Financing Authority Management’s Discussion and Analysis

INTRODUCTION
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is an integral component of the Authority’s Annual Financial Report, as shown in the overview below. The purpose of the MD&A is to present a discussion and analysis of the Authority’s financial performance for the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2025. This information, presented in conjunction with the Basic Financial Statements, is intended to provide a comprehensive understanding of the Authority’s operations and financial standing.

Required Components of the Annual Financial Report

THE BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Basic Financial Statements are comprised of 1) Government-wide (Authority-wide) Financial Statements, and; 2) Fund Financial Statements. These two sets of financial statements provide the reader two different perspectives of the Authority's financial activities and financial position.

Government-wide Financial Statements provide a longer-term view of the Authority's activities as a whole, and comprise the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities. The Statement of Net Position provides information about the financial position of the Authority as a whole, including all its capital assets and long-term liabilities on a full accrual basis, similar to that used by corporations. The Statement of Activities provides information about all the Authority's revenues and its expenses, also on a full accrual basis, with the emphasis on measuring net revenues and/or expenses for each of the Authority's programs.

The Statement of Activitiesexplains in detail the change in Net Positionfor the fiscal year.

All of the Authority's activities are required to be grouped into government activities and business-type activities. The entire amount in the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities are also required to be separated into governmental activities or business-type activities in order to distinguish between these two types of activities of the Authority.

Fund Financial Statements report the Authority's operations in more detail than the government-wide statements and focus primarily on the short-term activities of the Authority's general fund and other major funds. The Fund Financial Statements measure only current revenues and expenditures and fund balances; they exclude capital assets, long-term debt, and other long-term amounts.

Management’s
Discussion & Analysis
Government-Wide
Financial Statements
Fund
Financial Statements
Notes to the
Financial Statements
Basic
Financial Statements

329
Rocklin Public Financing Authority Management’s Discussion and Analysis

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Notes to the Financial Statements provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes can be found immediately following the fund financial statements.

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The following table summarized the Authority’s ending net position:

Dollar Percent
2025 2024 Change Change 2023
Assets
Current 597,286$ 1,105,003$ (507,717)$ -45.9% 1,602,199$ Total Assets 597,286$ 1,105,003$ (507,717)$ -45.9% 1,602,199$ Liabilities
Current 524,823$ 516,181$ 8,642$ 1.7% 508,623$ Noncurrent liabilities - 521,002 (521,002) -100.0% 1,029,183 Total Liabilities 524,823$ 1,037,183$ (512,360)$ -49.4% 1,537,806$ Deferred Inflows of Resources 442,202$ 663,305$ (221,103)$ -33.3% 884,408$ Net Position
Restricted 68,532$ 68,364$ 168$ 0.2% 68,193$ Unrestricted (438,271) (663,849) 225,578 34.0% (888,208) Total Net Position (369,739)$ (595,485)$ 225,746$ 37.9% (820,015)$ Table 1 - Net Position
The changes in current assets, total liabilities and deferred inflow of resources were the results of scheduled debt service payments and the amortization of deferred gains from defeasance.

330
Rocklin Public Financing Authority Management’s Discussion and Analysis

GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
An analysis of the changes in revenues, special items, and expenses by type of significant events follows:

Dollar Percent
2025 2024 Change Change 2023
General Revenues
Investment earnings 238,620$ 249,644$ (11,024)$ -4.4% 260,341$ Expenses
Interest on long-term debt 12,874 25,114 (12,240) -48.7% 34,938 Increase / (Decrease) in Net Position 225,746 224,530 1,216 -0.5% 225,403 Net Position, Beginning of Year (595,485) (820,015) 224,530 -27.4% (1,045,418) Net Position, End of Year (369,739)$ (595,485)$ 225,746$ -37.9% (820,015)$ Table 2 - Statement of Changes in Net Position
Significant changes in governmental revenues consisted of the following:

Investment earnings accounted for 100% of all revenue. Interest rates on Authority investments are predetermined and, therefore, subject to limited interest rate risk, providing a stable revenue source for the Authority.

DEBT ADMINISTRATION
The following table summarizes the Authority’s debt at the end of the year:
2025 2024 Dollar Change % Change 2023
Bank Loan -
RPFA Refunding 521,002$ 1,029,183$ (508,181)$ -49.4% 1,526,806$ Table 3 - Long-Term Debt
Additional detail and information on long-term debt activity is described in the notes to the financial statements (Note 3).

BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS
Changes from the Authority's original budget to the final budget are detailed in the Required Supplementary Information Section along with a comparison to actual activity for the year ended.

Changes to the Authority's budget that increase appropriations in a fund must be approved by a resolution of the Board. Appropriations did not change during the year. The adopted and final expenditure budget was $525,300.

331
Rocklin Public Financing Authority Management’s Discussion and Analysis

REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This financial report is designed to provide our customers and creditors a general overview of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority's finances and seeks to demonstrate the Authority's accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional information should be addressed to the Deputy Director of Administrative Services, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, California, 95677.

332
This page intentionally left blank

333

BASIC FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS

334
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2025 and 2024
2025 2024
ASSETS
Current Assets:

Cash and investments 7,752$ 7,456$
Restricted cash and investments 589,534 1,097,547 Total Assets 597,286$ 1,105,003$

LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:

Interest payable 3,821$ 8,000$
Long-term debt - due within one year 521,002 508,181 Total Current Liabilities 524,823 516,181
Noncurrent Liabilities:

Long-term debt - due after one year - 521,002
Total Noncurrent Liabilities - 521,002
Total Liabilities 524,823$ 1,037,183$

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred Gain on Early Defeasance of Long-Term Debt 442,202$ 663,305$

NET POSITION
Restricted 68,532$ 68,193$
Unrestricted (438,271) (663,678)
Total Net Position (369,739)$ (595,485)$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Governmental Activities

335
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Statement of Activities
For the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024
Functions/Programs 2025 2024
Governmental Activities
Expenses:

Interest on long-term debt (12,874)$ (25,114)$
General Revenues:

Investment earnings 238,620 249,644
Change in Net Position 225,746 224,530
Net Position - Beginning of Year (595,485) (820,015) Net Position - End of Year (369,739)$ (595,485)$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Net (Expense) Revenue and
Change in Net Position

336
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Balance Sheet
Governmental Funds
June 30, 2025 and 2024
2025 2024
ASSETS
Cash and investments 7,752$ 7,456$
Restricted cash and investments 589,534 1,097,547
Total assets 597,286$ 1,105,003$

FUND BALANCE
Restricted for debt service 597,286$ 1,105,003$
Total fund balance 597,286$ 1,105,003$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

337
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2025 and 2024
2025 2024
Total Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds 597,286$ 1,105,003$ Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position were different because:

Interest payable on long-term debt did not require current financial resources. Therefore, interest payable was not reported as a liability in Governmental Funds Balance Sheet. (3,821) (8,000) Long-term debt defeasances are reported in the funds as other financing uses based on cash payments related to the repayment of debt. However, the difference between the refunded debt and the refunding debt is reported as a deferred gain or loss in the government-wide statement of net position. (442,202) (663,305)
Long-term obligations were not due and payable in the current period. Therefore, they were not reported in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet. The long-term liabilities were adjusted as follows:

Pacific Premier bank loan (521,002) (1,029,183)
Net Position of Governmental Activities (369,739)$ (595,485)$ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

338
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance For the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024
2025 2024

REVENUES
Use of money and property 17,517$ 28,541$
Total Revenues 17,517 28,541

EXPENDITURES
Debt service:

Principal 508,181 497,623
Interest and fiscal charges 17,053 28,114
Total Expenditures 525,234 525,737
Net Change in Fund Balance (507,717) (497,196)
Fund Balance Beginning 1,105,003 1,602,199
Fund Balance Ending 597,286$ 1,105,003$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

339
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities
For the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024
2025 2024
Net Change in Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds (507,717) $ (497,196) $ Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities and Changes in net position were different because:

Repayment of long-term debt was an expenditure in governmental funds, but the repayment reduced long-term liabilities in the Government-Wide Statement of net position. 508,181 497,623 In governmental funds, deferred gain on early retirement of long-term debt is recognized as other finances uses. In the government-wide statements, the deferred gain on early retirement of long-term debt is amortized over the life of the debt. The difference between other financing uses and amortization is: 221,103 221,103 Interest expense on long-term debt was reported in the Government-Wide Statement of Activities and Changes in net position, but it did not require the use of current financial resources. Therefore, interest expense was not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. The following amount represented the net change in accrued interest from from prior year. 4,179 3,000
Change in Net Position of Governmental Activities 225,746$ 224,530$ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

340
This page is intentionally blank

341

NOTES TO FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS

342
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES On December 13, 1994, pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City of Rocklin (City) authorized the formation of a joint powers authority with the former Rocklin Redevelopment Agency to be known as the Rocklin Public Financing Authority (Authority).

The Authority is governed by a Board consisting of members of the City Council. Oversight responsibility, the ability to conduct independent financial affairs, issue debt instruments, approve budgets, and otherwise influence operations and account for fiscal matters is exercised by the Authority's governing board. The Authority is a blended component unit of the City for financial reporting purposes and the accompanying basic financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, fund balances/net position, revenues, and expenditures/expenses of the Authority only.

The basic financial statements of the Authority have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as applied to governmental agencies. The Governmental Accounting Standards Boards (GASB) is the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. The more significant of the Authority's accounting policies are described below.

A. Financial Reporting Entity
As defined by GASB Statement No. 39, The Financial Reporting Entity, the Authority is not financially accountable for any other entity other than itself, nor are there any other entities for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the Authority are such that exclusion would cause the Authority’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete.

B. Basis of Presentation, Accounting and Measurement Focus The accounts of the Authority are organized and accounted for in a governmental type debt service fund, which is considered a separate accounting entity. This debt service fund was established to account for the debt service activity of the Public Financing authority. The operations of a fund are accounted for with a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in a fund based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled.

Government-Wide Financial Statements
The Authority's government-wide financial statements include a Statement of Net Position and a Statement of Activities. These statements present summaries of governmental activities for the Authority.

These statements are presented on an "economic resources" measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all of the Authority's assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, deferred inflows of resources (including capital assets, as well as infrastructure assets, and long-term liabilities), are included in the accompanying Statement of Net Position, as applicable. The Statement of Activities presents changes in net position. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned while expenses are recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment.

343
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
Governmental Fund Financial Statements
Governmental fund financial statements include a Balance Sheet and a Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances for the Authority’s one major governmental fund. An accompanying schedule is presented to reconcile and explain the differences in fund balance as presented in these statements to the net position presented in the government-wide financial statements.

All governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or "current financial resources" measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, only current assets, deferred outflows of resources, current liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources are included on the balance sheets, as applicable. The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets.

Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period.

Accordingly, revenues are recorded when received in cash, except that revenues subject to accrual (up to 60 days after year-end) are recognized when due. Expenditures are recorded in the accounting period in which the related fund liability is incurred.

Unearned revenues arise when potential revenues do not meet both the "measurable" and "available" criteria for recognition in the current period. Unearned revenues also arise when the government receives resources before it has a legal claim to them, as when grant monies are received prior to incurring qualifying expenditures. In subsequent periods when both revenue recognition criteria are met or when the government has a legal claim to the resources, the unearned revenue is removed from the combined balance sheet and revenue is recognized.

C. Cash Deposits and Investments
For the purposes of the Statement of Net Position, “cash and investments” includes all demand, savings accounts, and certificates of deposits, or short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less.

The City has oversight responsibility for all Authority cash and investments.

The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loan associations to secure government cash deposits by pledging securities as collateral. This Code states that collateral pledged in this manner shall have the effect of perfecting a security interest in such collateral superior to those of a general creditor. Thus, collateral is considered to be held in the government’s name.

Investments are recorded at fair value in accordance with GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. Accordingly, the change in fair value of investments is recognized as an increase or decrease to investment assets and investment income.

344
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. In determining this amount, three valuation techniques are available:
 Market approach - This approach uses prices generated for identical or similar assets or liabilities.

The most common example is an investment in a public security traded in an active exchange such as the NYSE.
 Cost approach - This technique determines the amount required to replace the current asset. This approach may be ideal for valuing donations of capital assets or historical treasures.  Income approach - This approach converts future amounts (such as cash flows) into a current discounted amount.

Each of these valuation techniques requires inputs to calculate a fair value. Observable inputs have been maximized in fair value measures, and unobservable inputs have been minimized.

D. Deferred Outflows/Deferred Inflows
Deferred outflows of resources is a consumption of net position by the Authority that is applicable to a future reporting period; for example, prepaid items and deferred charges. Deferred inflows of resources is an acquisition of net position by the Authority that is applicable to a future reporting period; for example, advance collections or deferred gains from the early defeasance of long-term debt.

E. Interest Payable
In the government-wide financial statements, interest payable for long-term debt is recognized as an incurred liability. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types do not recognize the interest payable when the liability is incurred. Interest on long-term debt is recorded in the fund statements when the payment is made.

F. Long-Term Debt
All long-term debt to be repaid from governmental resources is reported as liabilities in the government- wide statements. The Long-term debt consists of a bank loan from Pacific Premier Bank.

Long-term debt for governmental funds is not reported as liabilities in the fund financial statements. The debt proceeds are reported as revenue and payment of principal and interest reported as expenditures.

G. Fund Balances
In accordance with GASB Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, the Authority classifies governmental fund balances as follows:

Nonspendable
Nonspendable fund balance includes fund balance amounts that cannot be spent either because it is not in spendable form or because of legal or contractual constraints.

Restricted
Restricted fund balance includes fund balance amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by providers, such as creditors or amounts constrained due to constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.

345
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
Committed
Committed fund balance includes fund balance amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by the government through formal action of the highest level of decision making authority and does not lapse at year-end. Committed fund balances are imposed by the Authority’s governing board.

Assigned
Assigned fund balance includes fund balance amounts that are intended to be used for specific purposes that are neither considered restricted or committed. Fund balance may be assigned by the Authority Manager.

Unassigned
The Unassigned fund b
alance category represents fund balance which may be held for specific types of uses or stabilization purposes, but is not yet directed to be used for a specific purpose. The detail of amounts reported for each of the above defined fund balance categories is reported in the governmental funds balance.

Flow Assumption / Spending Order Policy
When expenditures are incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balances are available, the Authority considers restricted funds to be spent first. When expenditures are incurred for which committed, assigned, or unassigned fund balances are available, the Authority considers amounts to be spent first out of committed funds, then assigned funds, and finally unassigned funds, as needed, unless the Authority’s governing board has directed otherwise.

H. Net Position
In the government-wide financial statements, net position is classified in the following categories:

Net Investment in Capital Assets
This amount consists of capital assets net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by outstanding debt that attributed to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the assets. In addition, deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets or related debt also are included in the net investment in capital assets component of net position. The Authority did not report any capital assets at the end of the year.

Restricted Net Position
This amount is restricted by external creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. Certain proceeds from debt are reported as restricted net position because their use is limited by applicable debt or other covenants.

Unrestricted Net Position
This amount is all net position that does not meet the definition of "net investment in capital assets" or "restricted net position."
The detail of amounts reported for each of the above defined net position categories is reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

346
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
Use of Restricted/Unrestricted Net Position
When an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted net position are available, the Authority's policy is to apply restricted net position first.

I. Budgets
Budgets are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting, in which debt principal and interest, and capital assets acquired are recorded as expenditures and depreciation is not recorded.

The Authority follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements:

1. By May 15, management recommends to the Board a proposed operating budget for the year commencing July 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them.

2. The budget is legally enacted through passage of a motion during a Board meeting prior to the commencement of the new fiscal year.

3. The Board approves all budget transfers and revisions.

4. Formal budgeting is employed as a management control device during the year.

5. Budgets for the Debt Service Fund are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP).

Budgeted amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by the Board. There were no amendments recorded for the fiscal year.

J. Use of Estimates
The preparation of basic financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

K. Comparative Data
Comparative data for the prior year has been presented in the accompanying financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the government's financial position and operations.

L. Implemented Accounting Pronouncements
GASB Statement No. 102, Certain Risk Disclosures
This Statement requires a government to assess whether a concentration or constraint makes the primary government reporting unit or other reporting units that report a liability for revenue debt vulnerable to the risk of a substantial impact. Additionally, this Statement requires a government to assess whether an event or events associated with a concentration or constraint that could cause the substantial impact have occurred, have begun to occur, or are more likely than not to begin to occur within 12 months of the date the financial statements are issued.

347
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024

If a government determines that those criteria for disclosure have been met for a concentration or constraint, it should disclose information in notes to financial statements in sufficient detail to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature of the circumstances disclosed and the government’s vulnerability to the risk of a substantial impact. The disclosure should include descriptions for (1) the concentration or constraint (2) each event associated with the concentration or constraint that could cause a substantial impact if the event had occurred or had begun to occur prior to the issuance of the financial statements (3) actions taken by the government prior to the issuance of the financial statements to mitigate the risk. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the Authority’s financial statements and management determined there were no were concentrations or constraints that make the Town vulnerable to the risk of substantial impact.

M. Upcoming Accounting and Reporting Changes

The Authority is currently analyzing its accounting practices to determine the potential impact on the financial statements of the following recent GASB Statements:

GASB Statement No. 103, Financial Reporting Model Improvements

This Statement is to improve key components of the financial reporting model to enhance its effectiveness in providing information that is essential for decision making and assessing a government’s accountability.

This Statement establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements or modifies existing requirements related to (a) Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) (b) Unusual or infrequent items (c) Presentation of the proprietary fund statement of revenues, expenses, and change in fund net position (d) Information about major component units in basic financial statements (5) Budgetary comparison information (6) financial trend information in the statistical section.

The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025, and all reporting periods thereafter.

GASB Statement No. 104, Disclosure of Certain Capital Assets

This Statement requires certain types of capital assets to be disclosed separately in the capital assets note disclosures required by Statement 34. Lease assets recognized in accordance with Statement No. 87, Leases, and intangible right-to-use assets recognized in accordance with Statement No. 94, Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements, should be disclosed separately by major class of underlying asset in the capital as-sets note disclosures. Subscription assets recognized in accordance with Statement No. 96, Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangements, also should be separately disclosed. In addition, this Statement requires intangible assets other than those three types to be disclosed separately by major class.

This Statement also requires additional disclosures for capital assets held for sale. A capital asset is a capital asset held for sale if (a) the government has decided to pursue the sale of the capital asset and (b) it is probable that the sale will be finalized within one year of the financial statement date. Governments should consider relevant factors to evaluate the likelihood of the capital asset being sold within the established time frame. This Statement requires that capital assets held for sale be evaluated each reporting period. Governments should disclose (1) the ending balance of capital assets held for sale, with separate disclosure for historical cost and accumulated depreciation by major class of asset, and (2) the carrying amount of debt for which the capital assets held for sale are pledged as collateral for each major

348
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
class of asset. The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025, and all reporting periods thereafter.

NOTE 2 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS
As of June 30, 2025, cash and investments were reported in the financial statements as follows:

Total
Cash and
Unrestricted Restricted Investments
Cash held with City of Rocklin 7,752$ -$ 7,752$ Bank money market accounts - 68,532 68,532 Special assessment loan investments - 521,002 521,002 Total cash and investments 7,752$ 589,534$ 597,286$ Fair Value
As of June 30, 2024, cash and investments were reported in the financial statements as follows:

Total
Cash and
Unrestricted Restricted Investments
Cash held with City of Rocklin 7,456$ -$ 7,456$ Bank money market accounts - 68,364 68,364 Special assessment loan investments - 1,029,183 1,029,183 Total cash and investments 7,456$ 1,097,547$ 1,105,003$ Fair Value
A. Cash Deposits
The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loan associations to secure the Authority's cash deposits by pledging securities as collateral. This Code states that collateral pledged in this manner shall have the effect of perfecting a security interest, and places the Authority ahead of general creditors of the institution.

The market value of pledged securities must equal at least 110 percent of the Authority's cash deposits.

California law also allows institutions to secure Authority deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes that have a value of 150 percent of the Authority's total cash deposits. The Authority has waived the collateral requirements for cash deposits which are fully insured to $250,000 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

B. Safekeeping
Securities purchased from broker-dealers are held in third party safekeeping by the trust department of the broker-dealer or other designated third-party trust in the Authority/City’s name and control, whenever possible.

349
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
C. Investment
Loans to CFD’s No. 6, No. 8 and No. 9 (special assessments) are investments of the Authority. The balance as of June 30, 2025 and 2024 was $521,002 and $1,029,183, respectively.

D. Investment Policies
Under the provisions of the Authority's investment policy, and in accordance with California Government Code, the following investments are authorized:

Category Standard
U.S. Treasuries No portfolio limit; 5 years max maturity Federal Agencies No portfolio limit; 20% max callable federal agency securities; 30% max per institution/issuer; 5 years max maturity
Supranational Obligations "AA" rated or better by a NRSRO; 30% portfolio max; 10% max per institution/issuer; 5 years max maturity; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by IBRD, IFC, or IADB; Eligible for purchase and sale within the U.S.

Municipal Securities (CA, Other States) "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% portfolio max; 5% max per institution; 5 years max maturity
Corporate Medium Term Notes "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% portfolio max; 5% max per institution/issuer; 5 years max maturity; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and
operating within the U.S.

Mortgage-Backed Securities "AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 20% portfolio max; 5% max per institution/issuer; 5 years max maturity; Mortgage
Pass-Through Securities, Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, Asset-Backed, or Mortgage-Backed bonds
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCD) The amount invested in NCDs subject to limitations of California Government Code; Any amount above the FDIC insured limit must be issued by institutions which have short-term debt obligations rated “A-1” or better by a NRSRO; or long-term obligations rated “A” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO; 30% portfolio max (combined with CDARS); 5% max per institution/ issuer; 5 years max maturity
Time Deposits (Non-negotiable CD/TD) 20% portfolio max; Max per institution/issuer limited to maximum covered under federal insurance; 5 years max maturity; Non-negotiable time deposits FDIC or collateralized in accordance with California Government Code and the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA)
Collateralized Bank Deposits No portfolio limit; deposits with financial institutions will be collateralized with pledged securities per California Government Code, Section 53651 Banker’s Acceptances Short-term debt obligations "A-1" rating category or better by a NRSRO or long- term debt obligations "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 40% portfolio max; 5% max per institution/issuer; 180 days max maturity Commercial Paper Issued by domestic corporation with assets >$500 million and having an "A-1" long-term rating or better by a NRSRO or if the issuer has other debt obligations, having an "A" long-term rating or better by a NRSRO; or Issuer organized in the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limitied liability company with program-wide credit enhancements and an "A-1" rating or better by a NRSRO; 25% portfolio max; 5% max per institution/issuer; 10% max of the outstanding paper of the issuing corporation; 270 days maturity

350
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
Category Standard
Money Market Mutual Funds 20% portfolio max; 20% max per shares of any one Money Market Mutual Fund; Shares of beneficial interest issued by Mutual Funds and Money Market Funds registered with SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940; Companies shall either: (i) Attain highest rating by two NRSROs; or (ii) Have an investment adviser registered with SEC with > 5 years experience investing in securities as authorized by by California Government Code, Section 53601, inclusive and with AUM >$500 million; The purchase price of shares of Mutual Funds or Money Market Funds shall not include any commission that the companies may charge
Mutual Funds 20% portfolio max; 10% max per shares of any one mutual fund; Shares of beneficial interest issued by Mutual Funds and Money Market Funds registered with SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940; Companies shall either:
(i) Attain highest rating by two NRSROs; or (ii) Have an investment adviser registered with SEC with > 5 years experience investing in securities as authorized by California Government Code, Section 53601 and with AUM >$500 million; Mutual Funds that invest in securities and obligations as authorized under California Government Code, Section 53601 (a) to (k) and (m) to (q). The purchase price of shares of Mutual Funds or Money Market Funds shall not include any commission that the companies may charge Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Maximum amount permitted by State law and LAIF Local Government Investment Pools 25% portfolio max in the Placer County Treasurer's Investment Pool Repurchase Agreements No portfolio limit; 1 year max maturity; 102% collateralized; Securities used as collateral for Repurchase Agreements will be delivered to an acceptable third-party custodian; Repurchase agreements are subject to a Master Repurchase Agreement (in the form developed by SIFMA) between the City and the provider of the repurchase agreement
E. Risk Disclosures
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the term of an investment’s maturity, the greater the sensitivity to changes in market interest rates.

Credit Risk
Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of an investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Authority’s investments were in compliance with the ratings required by the Authority’s investment policy, indenture agreements and Government Code.

Concentrations of Credit Risk
The investment policy of the Authority contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Authority invested 1% of its cash in money market accounts with Pacific Premier Bank and 99% in special assessment debt.

Custodial Credit Risk
For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the Authority will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the Authority's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for

351
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or government investment pools.

F. Fair Value Measurements
GASB 72 established a hierarchy of inputs to the valuation techniques above. This hierarchy has three levels:
 Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 inputs are quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other than quoted prices that are not observable.
 Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, such as a property valuation or an appraisal.

Money market accounts were valued using Level 2 inputs and special assessment bonds were valued using Level 1 inputs.

NOTE 3 -NONCURRENT LIABILTIIES
The Authority's changes in noncurrent liabilities were as follows for the year ended June 30, 2025:

Due
Beginning Ending Within One
Description Balance Additions Deletions Balance Year
Direct Borrowing:

Pacific Premier Bank Loan - RPFA Refunding 1,029,183$ -$ 508,181$ 521,002$ 521,002$ The Authority's changes in noncurrent liabilities were as follows for the year ended June 30, 2024:

Due
Beginning Ending Within One
Description Balance Additions Deletions Balance Year
Direct Borrowing:

Pacific Premier Bank Loan - RPFA Refunding 1,526,806$ -$ 497,623$ 1,029,183$ 508,181$ Rocklin Public Finance Authority Bank Loan
On July 1, 2017, the City, on behalf of Community Facilities Districts (CFD) 6, 8 and 9, agreed to borrow from the Rocklin Public Financing Authority (Authority) an amount necessary to refund 1999 CFD special tax bonds and pledged the special tax revenues levied in each CFD to the Authority. In the 2017 Special Tax Revenue Refunding Loan Agreement, the Authority agrees to borrow from Bank, the funds necessary to refund the 1999 CFD special tax bonds and in turn, refund the Authority’s 2003 refunding revenue bonds. The Bank loan is secured by a pledge of the revenues received by the Authority from the 2017 CFD loan payments. Bank has no remedy against the City if special taxpayers in the CFD's fail to make their payments. The loan was $5,000,077 at a fixed interest rate of 2.2% and matures on September 1, 2025. This loan was reported as City debt as required by GASB 62 and NCGA Statement 5. The refunding resulted in an economic gain of $1,989,923, which will be amortized over the life of the loan.

352
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Notes to the Basic Financial Statements
June 30, 2025 and 2024
The annual debt service requirements for long-term debt was as follows:

Year Ending
June 30, Principal Interest Total
2026 521,002$ 5,731.00$ 526,733$
NOTE 4 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lawsuits
The Authority could be exposed to certain matters of litigation that arise in the normal course of conducting Authority business. Management believes, based upon consultation with the Authority Attorney, that any cases, in the aggregate, would not be expected to result in a material adverse financial impact on the Authority.

353

OTHER INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR’S REPORTS

354
16450 Monterey Road #5, Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER

FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS

BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the Board of Directors of the
Rocklin Public Financing Authority
Rocklin, California
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Rocklin Public Financing Authority (the “Authority”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Authority’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated November 30, 2025.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Authority’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Authority’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses and significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.

Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Authority’s financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion

355
16450 Monterey Road #5, Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Tel: 408-217-8749 • E-Fax: 408-872-4159
[email protected] • www.cnallp.com
on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

November 30, 2025
Morgan Hill, California

356
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Engineering and Traffic Survey
Date:

February 24, 2026
Submitted By:

Wolf Stephenson, Assistant Civil Engineer
David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Director
Department:

Community Development
Recommendation:

Introduce, Waive the Full Reading and Read By Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending Chapter 10.11 of Title 10 of the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to Speed Limits within the City of Rocklin.

Background:

On October 14, 2025, the Community Development Department introduced an Ordinance to amend Chapter 10.11 of Title 10 of the Rocklin Municipal Code related to speed limits based on the results of the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS); the Ordinance was passed and adopted by the City Council on October 28, 2025. The E&TS included four roadway segments identified as requiring a re-survey before final speed recommendations could be made. The additional surveys are now complete, and the purpose of this ordinance is to incorporate the following results:

Sierra College Boulevard, between Granite Drive and Bass Pro Drive/Dominguez Road, will retain the existing 40 MPH speed limit.

University Avenue, between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Ranch View Drive, will retain the existing 35 MPH speed limit.

Sierra College Boulevard, between Rocklin Road and the City of Roseville border, will retain the existing 50 MPH speed limit.

Whitney Ranch Parkway, between State Route 65 and Wildcat Boulevard, will be reduced to a 40 MPH speed limit, from the current 45 MPH speed limit.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the staff recommendation.

Item Number D1.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance

2. Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin 357

Ordinance No. XXXX

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN AMENDING CHAPTER 10.11 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ROCKLIN

MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SPEED LIMITS WITHIN

THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

The City Council of the City of Rocklin does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Intent. Title 10 of the Rocklin Municipal Code (RMC) entitled “Vehicles and Traffic” sets forth the City’s regulations applicable to vehicles and traffic. Chapter 10.11 - Speed Limits establishes speed limits within the City of Rocklin that are below prima facie limits set by state laws pursuant to the authorization set forth in the Vehicle Code based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey for the City of Rocklin dated February 4, 2026 and to ensure such speed limits are enforceable.

Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this ordinance under the authority granted to cities by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution and Government Code section 37100.

Section 3 . Enactment. Chapter 10.11 shall be amended to provide Speed Limits under Title 10 as set forth below:

10.11 SPEED LIMITS

10.11.010 Findings.

A. Pursuant to Chapter 10.10 of the Rocklin Municipal Code and the authority contained in the Vehicle Code, the City Council determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limits set forth in this section would facil itate the orderly movement of vehicle traffic and would be reasonable and safe, and it is determined that a speed limit greater than those hereinafter set would be more than is reasonable and safe.

B. Based upon the review of the engineering and traffic survey and related information, the City Council determines that the following streets shall have the following posted speed limits and are established according to law:

1. 3rd Street:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and Farron Street, 30 MPH.

2. 5th Street:
a. Between Midas Avenue and Third Street, 25 MPH.

3. Argonaut Avenue:
a. Between Whitney Boulevard and Midas Avenue, 30 MPH,
358

Ordinance No. XXXX

b. Between Midas Avenue and End, 30 MPH.

4. Blue Oaks Boulevard:
a. Between the City of Roseville border and Sunset Boulevard, 45 MPH.

5. Bridlewood Drive:
a. Between Wildcat Boulevard and Whitney Ranch Parkway, 35 MPH.

6. China Garden Road:
a. Between Aguilar Road and End, 45 MPH.

7. Clover Valley Road:
a. Between Midas Avenue and Rawhide Road, 30 MPH.

8. Crest Drive:
a. Between Stanford Ranch Road and Park Drive, 35 MPH.

9. Delmar Avenue:
a. Between Pacific Street and the Town of Loomis border, 35 MPH.

10. Dominguez Road:
a. Between Pacific Street and Granite Drive, 35 MPH.

11. Fairway Drive:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Road, 35 MPH.

12. Farrier Road:
a. Between Park Drive and Darby Road, 35 MPH.

13. Farron Street:
a. Between Pacific Street and 3rd Street, 30 MPH.

14. Five Star Boulevard:
a. Between Stanford Ranch Road and End, 30 MPH.

15. Granite Drive:
a. Between Rocklin Road and Sierra Meadows Drive, 30 MPH, b. Between Sierra Meadows Drive and Dominguez Road, 40 MPH, c. Between Dominguez Road and Sierra College Boulevard, 40 MPH.

16. Lonetree Boulevard:
a. Between Blue Oaks Boulevard and West Oaks Boulevard, 40 MPH,
359

Ordinance No. XXXX

b. Between West Oaks Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard, 45 MPH.

17. Midas Avenue:
a. Between Pacific Street and Argonaut Avenue, 30 MPH,
b. Between Argonaut Avenue and Whitney Boulevard, 30 MPH, c. Between Whitney Boulevard and End, 30 MPH.

18. Old Ranch House Road:
a. Between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Creek Hollow Drive, 30 MPH.

19. Pacific Street:
a. Between the City of Roseville border and Sunset Boulevard, 45 MPH,
b. Between Sunset Boulevard and Americana Way, 40 MPH,
c. Between Americana Way and the Town of Loomis border, 40 MPH.

20. Painted Pony Lane:
a. Between Whitney Ranch Parkway and West Oaks Boulevard, 35 MPH.

21. Park Drive:
a. Between the City of Roseville border and Sunset Boulevard, 45 MPH,
b. Between Sunset Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Road, 45 MPH, c. Between Stanford Ranch Road and Crest Drive, 45 MPH, d. Between Crest Drive and the intersection of Whitney Ranch Parkway and Whitney Oaks Drive, 45 MPH.

22. Ranch View Drive:
a. Between Spring Creek Drive and Wildcat Boulevard, 35 MPH.

23. Rawhide Road:
a. Between Midas Avenue and End, 30 MPH.

24. Rocklin Road:
a. Between 5th Street and Pacific Street, 30 MPH,
b. Between Pacific Street and Granite Drive, 35 MPH,
c. Between Granite Drive and El Don Drive, 40 MPH,
d. Between El Don Drive and the Town of Loomis border, 40 MPH.

25. Scarborough Drive:
a. Between Sierra College Boulevard and the City of Roseville border, 35 MPH.

360

Ordinance No. XXXX

26. Schriber Way:
a. Between Sierra College Boulevard and Lakepointe Drive, 30 MPH.

27. Sierra College Boulevard:
a. Between the Placer County border and the Town of Loomis border, 55 MPH,
b. Between Granite Drive and Bass Pro Drive/Dominguez Road, 40 MPH,
c. Between Bass Pro Drive/ Dominguez Road and Rocklin Road, 50 MPH,
d. Between Rocklin Road and the City of Roseville border, 50 MPH.

28. Sierra Meadows Drive:
a. Between Granite Drive and Pacific Street, 35 MPH.

29. South Whitney Boulevard:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and Five Star Boulevard, 30 MPH.

30. Spring Creek Drive:
a. Between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Ranch View Drive, 35 MPH.

31. Springview Drive:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and Springview Meadows Drive, 35 MPH,
b. Between Springview Meadows Drive and South Whitney
Boulevard, 30 MPH.

32. Stanford Ranch Road:
a. Between the City of Roseville border to Park Drive, 40 MPH, b. Between Park Drive and West Oaks Boulevard, 45 MPH.

33. Sunset Boulevard:
a. Between Highway 65 and Blue Oaks Boulevard, 45 MPH,
b. Between Blue Oaks Boulevard and Park Drive, 45 MPH,
c. Between Park Drive and Stanford Ranch Road, 45 MPH,
d. Between Stanford Ranch Road and Whitney Boulevard, 40 MPH, e. Between Whitney Boulevard and Pacific Street, 40 MPH, f. Between Pacific Street and Woodside Drive, 30 MPH.

34. University Avenue:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and Whitney Ranch Parkway, 40 MPH,
b. Between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Ranch View Drive, 35 MPH.
361

Ordinance No. XXXX

35. West Oaks Boulevard:
a. Between Lonetree Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard, 45 MPH, b. Between Sunset Boulevard and West Stanford Ranch Road, 45 MPH,
c. Between West Stanford Ranch Road and Hunter Drive, 40 MPH, d. Between Hunter Drive and Painted Pony Lane, 35 MPH.

36. West Ranch View Drive:
a. Between Wildcat Boulevard and End, 35 MPH.

37. West Stanford Ranch Road:
a. Between Sunset Boulevard and West Oaks Boulevard, 45 MPH.

38. Whitney Boulevard:
a. Between Crest Drive and Midas Avenue, 35 MPH.
b. Between Midas Avenue and Sunset Boulevard, 35 MPH.

39. Whitney Oaks Drive:
a. Between Park Drive and Whitney Ranch Parkway, 35 MPH.

40. Whitney Ranch Parkway:
a. Between Highway 65 and Wildcat Boulevard, 40 MPH,
b. Between Wildcat Boulevard and Painted Pony Lane, 45 MPH. c. Between Painted Pony Lane and Ranch View Drive, 35 MPH. d. Between Ranch View Drive and Whitney Oaks Drive, 35 MPH.

41. Wildcat Boulevard:
a. Between West Stanford Ranch Road and City of Lincoln border, 45 MPH.

42. Woodside Drive:
a. Between Pacific Street and Evelyn Avenue, 30 MPH.

43. Wyckford Boulevard:
a. Between Park Drive and Stratton Court, 35 MPH.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5 . Environmental Analysis . The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act 362

Ordinance No. XXXX

(CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060, subdivision (c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061, subdivision (b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment).

Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the day of its adoption.

Section 7. Publication. Within fifteen (15) days of the passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the Ordinance, with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Placer Herald. In lieu of publishing the full text of the Ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen (15) days, shall cause a summary of the Ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Placer Herald, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of the Ordinance, along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the ordinance. The publication of a summary of the Ordinance in lieu of the full text of the Ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code section 36933(c)(1) are met.

363

Ordinance No. XXXX

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on ______________, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk

First Reading: 2.24.2026
Second Reading:

Effective Date:
364
Balan cin g Fun ctionality and L ivability sin ce 1995 w-trans.com

T RAF FIC ENGIN EERING

T RANSPORTATI ON P LANNING
Prepared for the City of Rocklin
Engineering Division
Submitted by
W-Trans
February 4, 2026
Engineering and Traffic Surveys
for the City of Rocklin
365
366
i Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 2026
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Study Procedure ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Study Participants and References ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Tables

1. Summary of Engineering and Traffic Surveys ................................................................................................................... 7 Appendices
A. Average Daily Traffic Counts
B. Radar Speed Survey Data
C. Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension Worksheet
D. Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms
367
368
1 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Introduction
This report provides background and presents the results of the analysis performed while preparing consolidated Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TSs) for 85 street segments in the City of Rocklin . These surveys were performed in compliance with the current laws and practices of the State of California, which require that an E&TS be completed to establish radar enforceable speed limits under certain conditions.

Chapter 7 of Division 11 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) deals with speed laws. T he CVC indicates that prima facie speed limits on roadways are 25 miles per hour (mph) in residential and business districts and 15 mph at railroad grade crossings, highway intersections with sight restrictions, and on any alley . Section 22349 currently sets the maximum speed limit at 65 mph and sets the maximum speed limit on a two-lane undivided highway at 55 mph . The CVC also allows for intermediate speed limits . Section 22357 indicates that whenever a local jurisdiction “…determines upon the basis of an Engineering and Traffic Survey that a speed greater than 25 mph would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe…, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 mph…, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.” Similarly, Section 22358 allows local jurisdictions to decrease a prima facie 65-mph speed limit by ordinance to 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 mph based on an E&TS, if such speed is found to be appropriate, reasonable, and safe. As described in Section 22358.9, a local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a 25- or 20-mph prima facie speed limit in a business activity district. A business activity district is a portion of a highway that meets at least three of the following requirements:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway; (2)
P
arking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway; (3) T
raffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet; and
(4) M
arked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

Section 22358.7 also states that if a local authority, after completing an E&TS, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe they may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) T
he portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor, or (2) T
he portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities and the unhoused.

Section 22358.8 allows a local authority, after completing an E&TS, to “retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit” by ordinance if they find the speed limit from the new survey to be more than reasonable or safe. This only applies if the following criteria are met:
(1) T
he previous speed limit was established with an engineering traffic survey and (2) A reg
istered engineer determined that no general -purpose lanes were added since the previous survey that established the speed limit.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 382 was recently passed and provides greater flexibility to jurisdictions in setting school zone speed limits. Under AB 382, the 25-mph prima facie school zone speed limit within 500 feet of school grounds will be modified to 20 mph on January 1, 2031. Effective January 1, 2026, CVC Section 22352.5 provides the option to declare a 20- mph school zone speed limit within 500 feet of school grounds by ordinance or 369
2 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
resolution (25-mph school zones may still be posted until 2031 without an ordinance or resolution), to prepare for the change in 2031. Per CVC Section 22358.4, AB 382 also includes an option to post an extended 25-mph school zone between 500 feet and 1,000 feet from school grounds with no additional requirements.

The E&TS is defined in Section 627 of the CVC as being a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the State and Local authorities . In the E&TS, consideration must be made for prevailing speeds, collision records, highway traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver . The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (CA-MUTCD) contains two methods for conducting an E&TS: one for State Highways, and one for City and County Through Highways, Arterials, and Collector Roads and Local Streets. Recommendations contained in the CA-MUTCD have been used in the preparation of this report.

In addition to the above requirements, Section 40802 of the CVC, the “speed trap” law, as amended effective January 1, 2023, indicates that radar cannot be used to enforce a speed limit unless the speed limit is justified by an E&TS which was conducted within the last seven years, though this time frame may be extended to fourteen years if a review is performed by a registered engineer and a determination made that there have been no significant changes to the roadway or t raffic conditions. Radar can be used to enforce a speed limit without an E&TS for local streets, school zones, senior zones, or business activity districts.

This report and the procedures used to formulate its recommendations fully meet the requirements of the CVC and the CA-MUTCD and will allow the Rocklin Police Department to continue enforcing speed limits with the use of radar along applicable roadway segments.
370
3 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Study Procedure
Selection of Locations
The main objective of this study was to analyze 85 street segments in the City of Rocklin and recommend appropriate speed limits for each of these street segments consistent with the laws and practices of the State of California. Where appropriate, use of applicable laws to extend the life of an existing survey was recommended.

Conducting the Radar Surveys
Radar speed surveys were performed on street sections where the traffic speeds, traffic volumes, street width, or other significant factors were different from an adjacent section. Thus, a major arterial may require speed surveys for several segments to account for changes in these factors whereas a minor street with consistency in these areas may be sufficiently evaluated with just one survey. Each of the radar speed surveys was collected by a person stationed inconspicuously along the street, either from a standing position outside the travel way or from a parked, unmarked vehicle. An effort was made to ensure that the presence of the person or vehicle in no way affected the speed of the traffic being surveyed . Field information was recorded on forms and later coded for computer analysis. Part 2 of the CA -MUTCD indicates that it is desirable to have a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles for a speed zone survey. For low volume roadways this may result in excessive survey periods, so a smaller survey is adequate though in no case should it contain less than 50 vehicles. Copies of traffic count data and radar speed survey results are provided in Appendices A and B respectively.

Analysis of Data
Observed conditions include the direction of travel and number of vehicles surveyed, the date and day of the week, and the time period during which the survey was conducted. The existing posted speed limit is also noted.

Calculated values include the 50 th percentile speed, the 85 th percentile speed, the 10- mph pace speed, the percentage of vehicles observed within the 10- mph pace speed, the range of speeds observed, and the total number of vehicles observed. An explanation of these terms follows.

The 50th percentile speed is that speed above and below which 50 percent of the sample speeds lie. This is also known as the median or middle speed.

The 85th percentile or critical speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the observed vehicles were traveling. It is assumed that most drivers will travel at a reasonable speed without the benefit of any speed limits, speed signs, or enforcement. The behavior of traffic is a good indication of the appropriate speed limit that should apply to a specific section of a highway. It is generally believed that at least 85 percent of the drivers operate at speeds which are reasonable and prudent for the conditions pertaining to each situation. Therefore, the 85 th percentile speed of a spot speed survey is the primary indicator of a speed limit which might be imposed subject to the secondary factors of collision experience, traffic volumes, road features or other special situations.

The pace is the 10-mph increment of observed speeds which contains the greatest number of vehicles . In most cases, the 85th percentile speed and the recommended speed limit lie somewhere within the pace, frequently in the middle to upper ranges . This is another indicator that traffic engineers use to determine appropriate speed limits.

The percentage (of vehicles) in the pace speed is an indication of the bunching of vehicular speeds . Ideally, if all vehicles were traveling at or about the same speed, there would be a reduced likelihood of traffic collisions. In speed limit analysis, the higher the percent age of vehicles within the pace speed, the more optimal the speed distribution.

Vehicles observed is the total number of vehicles surveyed during the spot speed survey. 371
4 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Driving the Streets
A final field check was conducted which involves an experienced traffic engineer registered in the State of California driving each street surveyed while “floating” with prevailing traffic to determine the speed of traffic which is reasonable from the driver’s viewpoint . The traffic engineer is equipped with the previously described data analysis and is particularly cognizant of the 85th percentile speed and the pace speeds. The engineer evaluates the appropriateness of the 85th percentile speed and adds the perspective of human judgement to the speed limit setting process . Such factors as roadside land use, the number and location of driveways, parked vehicles, emergency shoulder areas, schools, and playgrounds, areas frequented by pedestrians, horizontal and vertical alignment of the roadway, super-elevation, intersection spacing, visibility and control, landscaping, and numerous other less tangible factors, all go into the judgment producing a final recommended limit.

Collision Review
Collision histories are an important factor in speed limit establishment. Before developing the final recommended limits, the engineer must be aware of collision histories, collision problems, and collision distributions. The most recent three-year period of reported collision histories available at the time of this evaluation was January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2024. Records provided by the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for this period were reviewed prior to developing the recommendations for the speed limits described in this report. The collision rate is noted for all street segments . The collision history is presented both numerically and as a rate of the number of collisions per million vehicle miles . For the study segments, the collision rates for each segment vary from 0.00 to 1.85 collisions per million vehicle miles . According to 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways, Caltrans, the statewide average collision rates for comparable urban facilities vary from 0.64 to 1.07 collisions per million vehicle miles for conventional two- lane and three-lane roadways, divided and undivided four-lane roadways, and divided and undivided roadways with five or more lanes . The comparable statewide average rates were used as a point of comparison to determine if the collision experience on any study segment was typical of what occurs on other similar facilities or represented an unusually high number of collisions.

If a study segment was found to have an above-average collision rate, consideration was given to recommending a speed limit five mph lower than the nearest 85 th percentile speed, as allowed by state law . An above-average collision rate does not necessarily indicate justification for a reduced speed limit; however, it was reviewed in conjunction with other conditions not readily apparent to drivers to determine if a reduction in the speed limit is appropriate.

Speed Limit Recommendation Philosophy
With all the statistics inherent in the speed survey process, there is a great deal of engineering judgment required, and to a certain extent, a philosophy implied during the establishment of speed limits . Speed limits should be reasonable and realistic regardless of the results of the field studies . Reasonable limits are those at which responsible motorists would drive without enforcement and without any signing. One cannot rely totally on this philosophy, however, as motorists tend to drive somewhat faster in residential districts away from their homes than the residents on that street would prefer. In other words, motorists tend to be more concerned about speeds near their own homes and less concerned elsewhere. This is not so much a tendency to willfully break the law or to drive unsafely, but rather a reflection of human nature, the press of time, and the use of high- performance vehicles. For this reason, speed limits on two-lane local residential streets tend to be somewhat further removed from the critical 85
th percentile speed than those on multi-lane arterial and collector streets.

The CVC and CA-MUTCD prescribe that a speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5 -mph increment to the critical 85th percentile speed. The speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from this nearest 5-mph increment based upon factors such as collision experience or other factors not readily apparent to the motorist. For cases in which the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 -mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed without evidence of any specific need to do so , but no further reduction is allowed except as described in CVC Section 22358.7; an additional five miles per hour can be reduced for a safety corridor or segment adjacent to land or facilities that generate a high concentration of bicyclists or pedestrians . The types of land and facilities that qualify as bicycle 372
5 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
and pedestrian generators are listed in Table 2B-106(CA) of the CA-MUTCD, and the CA-MUTCD indicates that the entire roadway segment must be within a quarter mile of a generator for the five-mph reduction to be applicable.

The prima facie speed limit of fifteen (15) mph applies to railroad grade crossings, intersections with sight restrictions, and alleys. The prima facie speed limit of 25 mph applies on any non- state highway in a business or residence district, as defined in Sections 235 and 515 of the CVC, respectively; when passing a school posted by a “SCHOOL” sign when children are traveling to or from the facility; or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. The 25-mph prima facie speed limit is radar enforceable on “local streets” based on the provisions of Section 40802 of the CVC . In the CVC, a local street is defined as one that is functionally classified as “local” on the California Road System Maps, is no more than 40 feet wide, has not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length, and has no more than one traffic lane in each direction. It is noted that while currently a 25- mph prima facia speed limit may be posted for school zones, this will be reduced to 20 mph on January 1, 2031. Jurisdictions may post a 20-mph school zone speed limit now upon adoption of an ordinance or resolution. Other unposted two- lane roads which do not meet the criteria described above have a maximum speed limit of 55 mph.

Segment Classification
E&TSs for 85 roadway segments were completed at various times in 2018 and 2022. A review of recently adopted changes to legislation indicated that many of these segments no longer require an E&TS because they meet certain conditions which exempt them from needing to be surveyed to maintain radar speed enforcement. A summary of those findings is provided in this section.

Ten segments were removed from consideration as they have existing speed limits of 25 mph and are classified as either a local street on the California Road System Map as approved by the Federal Highway Administration or satisfy the definition of a local street as prescribed by the CVC in Section 40802. As local streets, the following segments are assigned a radar-enforceable prima facie 25-mph speed limit and do not require the preparation of an E&TS.

1. Aguilar Road between Rocklin Road and Greenbrae Road

2. Americana Way between Pacific Street and Delmar Avenue

3. Atherton Road between Sunset Boulevard and Lonetree Boulevard

4. Casa Grande Avenue between Fairway Drive and Lincoln Avenue

5. East Midas Avenue between Pacific Street and Grove Street

6. El Don Drive between Rocklin Road and Sierra College Boulevard

7. Grove Street between Pacific Street and Rocklin Road

8. Nightwatch Drive between Sierra College Boulevard and Echo Ridge Road

9. South Grove Street between Rocklin Road and Kannasto Street

10. Topaz Avenue between Sunset Boulevard and Whitney Boulevard Of the remaining 75 total segments, 54 have valid E&TSs which expire in 2025 . These E&TSs meet the criteria described in CVC Section 40802 (c)(2)(B) and would remain valid until 2032 upon certification that conditions have not changed . Copies of the E&TS Extension Worksheets that allow the City to retain these existing E&TSs for another seven years are provided in Appendix C.

1. 3rd Street between Sunset Boulevard and Farron Street

2. 5th Street between Midas Avenue and 3rd Street

3. Argonaut Avenue between Midas Avenue and End

4. Argonaut Avenue between Whitney Boulevard and Midas Avenue

5. Blue Oaks Boulevard between Sunset Boulevard and Roseville Border

6. Bridlewood Drive between Wildcat Boulevard and Whitney Ranch Pkwy

7. China Garden Road between Aguilar Road and End

8. Clover Valley Road between Midas Avenue and Rawhide Road

9. Crest Drive between Stanford Ranch Road and Park Drive

10. Fairway Drive between Sunset Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Road

11. Farrier Road between Park Drive and Darby Road
373
6 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026

12. Farron Street between Pacific Street and 3rd Street

13. Five Star Boulevard between Stanford Ranch Road and End

14. Granite Drive between Rocklin Road and Sierra Meadows Drive

15. Granite Drive between Sierra Meadows Drive and Dominguez Road

16. Granite Drive between Dominguez Road and Sierra College Boulevard

17. Lonetree Boulevard between West Oaks Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard

18. Midas Avenue between Pacific Street and Argonaut Avenue

19. Midas Avenue between Whitney Boulevard and End

20. Pacific Street between Roseville Border and Sunset Boulevard

21. Pacific Street between Americana Wy and Loomis Border

22. Park Drive between Roseville Border and Sunset Boulevard

23. Park Drive between Sunset Boulevard and Stanford Ranch Road

24. Park Drive between Stanford Ranch Road and Crest Drive

25. Park Drive between Crest Drive and Whitney Ranch Parkway/Whitney Oaks Drive

26. Ranch View Drive between Wildcat Boulevard and Spring Creek Drive

27. Rawhide Road between Midas Avenue and End

28. Rocklin Road between Granite Drive and El Don Drive

29. Rocklin Road between El Don Drive and Loomis Border

30. Scarborough Drive between Sierra College Boulevard and Roseville Border

31. Sierra College Boulevard between Loomis Border and Placer County

32. Sierra College Boulevard between Bass Pro Drive/Dominguez Road and Rocklin Road

33. Sierra Meadows Drive between Pacific Street and Granite Drive

34. South Whitney Boulevard between Sunset Boulevard and Five Star Boulevard

35. Spring Creek Drive between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Ranch View Drive

36. Springview Drive between Springview Meadows Drive and Sunset Boulevard

37. Springview Drive between South Whitney Boulevard and Springview Meadows Drive

38. Stanford Ranch Road between Roseville Border and Park Drive

39. Stanford Ranch Road between Park Drive and West Oaks Boulevard

40. Sunset Boulevard between Highway 65 and Blue Oaks Boulevard

41. Sunset Boulevard between Blue Oaks Boulevard and Park Drive

42. Sunset Boulevard between Park Drive and Stanford Ranch Road

43. Sunset Boulevard between Stanford Ranch Road and Whitney Boulevard

44. Sunset Boulevard between Whitney Boulevard and Pacific Street

45. Sunset Boulevard between Pacific Street and Woodside Drive

46. West Oaks Boulevard between Lonetree Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard

47. West Oaks Boulevard between Sunset Boulevard and West Stanford Ranch Road

48. West Ranch View Drive between Wildcat Boulevard and End

49. West Stanford Ranch Road between Sunset Boulevard and West Oaks Boulevard

50. Whitney Boulevard between Crest Drive and Midas Avenue

51. Whitney Oaks Drive between Whitney Ranch Parkway and Park Drive

52. Wildcat Boulevard between West Stanford Ranch Road and Lincoln Border

53. Woodside Drive between Pacific Street and Evelyn Avenue

54. Wyckford Boulevard between Park Drive and Stratton Court None of the study segments in Rocklin would satisfy the Business Activity District criteria described in CVC Section 22358.9 and therefore cannot have a radar-enforceable prima facie speed limit of 20 or 25 mph applied under this criterion.
374
7 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Recommendations
Policy on Establishing Speed Limits
In accordance with Sections 627, 22348 through 22413, and 40802 of the CVC , E&TS s were completed to determine the recommended speed limits along each corridor. The CA-MUTCD was consulted prior to preparation of the E&TSs contained in this report. Part 2, “Signs,” contains the policy for establishing speed limits based on an E&TS, and indicates that the speed limit shall be established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th-percentile speed, except that the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5-mph increment of the 85th percentile speed in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 and justified by an E&TS, including approval by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. If the local authority determines that the resulting speed limit from the E&TS is still more than reasonable or safe, an additional reduction of five mph is allowed for safety corridors or segments adjacent to bicycle and pedestrian generators, or jurisdictions are permitted to retain a prior speed limit under certain conditions. The CA -MUTCD also includes standards for the preparation of an E&TS, specifically noting that each E&TS shall consider prevailing speeds, collision records, and highway or traffic or roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Recommended Speed Limits
Speed limits are recommended for each of the segments studied based on the policies described in the CVC and the CA -MUTCD. The results of the surveys are summarized below, with the existing posted speed limits and recommended speed limits for all segments tabulated in Table 1. Copies of the E&TS forms compiled from the field data and subsequent analysis are contained in Appendix D.

Table 1 – Summary of Engineering and Traffic Surveys
No. Street Segment Average
Collision Rates
Critical
Speed
Existing
Speed
Limit
Proposed
Speed
Limit
Change
in Speed
Limit Segment State
1 Delmar Ave (Pacific St-Loomis Border) 0.00 1.07 40 35 35 0 2 Dominguez Rd (Pacific St-Granite Dr) 1.02 1.07 37 35 35 0 3 Lonetree Blvd (Blue Oaks Blvd-
W Oaks Blvd)

0.73 0.64 43 40 40 0
4 Midas Ave (Argonaut Ave-Whitney Blvd) 1.85 1.07 36 30 30 0 5 Old Ranch House Rd (Whitney Ranch Pkwy-
Creek Hollow Dr)

0.00 1.07 31 30 30 0
6 Pacific St (Sunset Blvd-Americana Wy) 0.50 0.75 43 40 40 0 7 Painted Pony Ln (Whitney Ranch Pkwy-
W Oaks Blvd)

1.48 1.07 34 35 35 0
8 Rocklin Rd (5th St-Pacific St) 0.00 1.07 36 30 30 0
9 Rocklin Rd (Pacific St-Granite Dr) 1.23 0.75 33 35 35 0 10 Schriber Wy (Sierra College Blvd-
Lakepointe Dr)

0.66 1.07 36 30 30 0
11 Sierra College Blvd (Granite Dr-
Bass Pro Dr/Dominguez Rd)

0.44 1.00 45 40 40 0
12 Sierra College Blvd (Rocklin Rd-
Roseville Border)

0.22 0.77 58 50 50* 0
375
8 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Table 1 – Summary of Engineering and Traffic Surveys
No. Street Segment Average
Collision Rates
Critical
Speed
Existing
Speed
Limit
Proposed
Speed
Limit
Change
in Speed
Limit Segment State
13 University Ave (Sunset Blvd-
Whitney Ranch Pkwy)

1.24 0.64 43 40 40 0

14 University Ave (Whitney Ranch Pkwy-
W Ranch View Dr)

0.36 1.07 42 35 35 0
15 W Oaks Blvd (Stanford Ranch Rd-Hunter Dr) 0.30 0.64 40 40 40 0 16 W Oaks Blvd (Hunter Dr-Painted Pony Ln) 0.19 1.07 40 35 35 0 17 Whitney Blvd (Midas Ave-Sunset Blvd) 0.29 1.07 39 35 35 0 18 Whitney Ranch Pkwy (SR-65-Wildcat Blvd) 0.00 0.87 42 45 40 -5 19 Whitney Ranch Pkwy (Wildcat Blvd-
Painted Pony Ln)

0.14 0.93 47 45 45 0
20 Whitney Ranch Pkwy (Painted Pony Ln-
Ranch View Dr)

0.47 1.07 34 35 35 0
21 Whitney Ranch Pkwy (Ranch View Dr-
Whitney Oaks Dr)

0.48 1.07 42 35 35 0
Note: Collision rates are shown in collisions per million vehicle miles; Speed is shown in miles per hour; Critical Speed = 85th Percentile Speed; * = Additional 5 mph reduction applied for a segment adjacent to land or facilities generating high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians (California Vehicle Code Section 22358.7)

376
9 Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 4, 2026
Study Participants and References
Study Participants
Principal in Charge Dalene J. Whitlock, PE (Civil, Traffic), PTOE Traffic Engineer Kevin Carstens, PE (Civil, Traffic)
Associate Engineer Nathan Sharafian, EIT
Editing/Formatting Erika Totanes
Quality Control Dalene J. Whitlock, PE (Civil, Traffic), PTOE References
2023 Crash Data on California State Highways, California Department of Transportation, 2025 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways Revision 3, California Department of Transportation, 2018
California Road System (CRS) Maps, http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/crs_maps/ California Vehicle Code, State of California, 2018,
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=VEH&tocTitle=+Vehicle+Code+- +VEH
RO
C900-4
377
378
A

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 2026
Appendix A
Average Daily Traffic Counts

379
380
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_001
NB SB EB WB Total
1,578 1,607 0 0 3,185

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 04 4 12:00 34 36 70 00:00 01:00 31 0 13
0:15 15 6 12:15 39 32 71 01:00 02:00 32 5
0:30 01 1 12:30 51 30 81 02:00 03:00 54 9
0:45 20 2 12:45 44 34 78 03:00 04:00 22 5 27
1:00 02 2 13:00 37 32 69 04:00 05:00 15 14 29
1:15 00 0 13:15 22 32 54 05:00 06:00 83 32 115
1:30 10 1 13:30 29 18 47 06:00 07:00 173 69 242
1:45 20 2 13:45 28 24 52 07:00 08:00 146 94 240
2:00 02 2 14:00 31 31 62 08:00 09:00 113 123 236
2:15 11 2 14:15 45 24 69 09:00 10:00 87 109 196
2:30 10 1 14:30 17 49 66 10:00 11:00 101 104 205
2:45 31 4 14:45 19 28 47 11:00 12:00 118 128 246
3:00 20 2 15:00 28 42 70 12:00 13:00 168 132 300
3:15 21 3 15:15 28 34 62 13:00 14:00 116 106 222
3:30 83 11 15:30 16 64 80 14:00 15:00 112 132 244
3:45 10 1 11 15:45 29 31 60 15:00 16:00 101 171 272
4:00 43 7 16:00 13 62 75 16:00 17:00 56 153 209
4:15 23 5 16:15 16 34 50 17:00 18:00 55 81 136
4:30 53 8 16:30 16 31 47 18:00 19:00 31 45 76
4:45 45 9 16:45 11 26 37 19:00 20:00 19 40 59
5:00 10 6 16 17:00 16 27 43 20:00 21:00 17 12 29
5:15 15 1 16 17:15 11 20 31 21:00 22:00 19 19 38
5:30 13 2 15 17:30 15 21 36 22:00 23:00 79 16
5:45 45 23 68 17:45 13 13 26 23:00 00:00 8 13 21
6:00 41 25 66 18:00 12 17 29
6:15 35 17 52 18:15 41 1 15 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 42 13 55 18:30 67 13 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 55 14 69 18:45 91 0 19 869 694 1563
7:00 39 31 70 19:00 61 8 24 6:00 11:00 6:30
7:15 34 21 55 19:15 57 12 173 128 249
7:30 26 23 49 19:30 57 12 0.786 0.889 0.889
7:45 47 19 66 19:45 38 11
8:00 29 34 63 20:00 42 6 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 33 31 64 20:15 43 7 709 913 1622
8:30 20 31 51 20:30 45 9 12:15 15:15 12:00
8:45 31 27 58 20:45 52 7 171 191 300
9:00 22 31 53 21:00 44 8 0.838 0.746 0.926
9:15 16 23 39 21:15 66 12
9:30 24 31 55 21:30 46 10 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 25 24 49 21:45 53 8 259 217 476
10:00 23 19 42 22:00 24 6 7:00 8:00 7:45
10:15 31 31 62 22:15 11 2 146 123 244
10:30 27 23 50 22:30 22 4 0.777 0.904 0.924
10:45 20 31 51 22:45 22 4
11:00 26 31 57 23:00 13 4 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 34 27 61 23:15 53 8 111 234 345
11:30 32 34 66 23:30 24 6 16:15 16:00 16:00
11:45 26 36 62 23:45 0 3 3 59 153 209
TOTALS 869 694 0 0 1563 TOTALS 709 913 0 0 1622 0.922 0.617 0.697 SPLIT % 56% 44% 0% 0% 49% SPLIT % 44% 56% 0% 0% 51%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Delmar Ave Bet Citrus Ave & Del Rio Ct/Monopoly Ct
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_002
NB SB EB WB Total
1,926 1,884 0 0 3,810

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 21 3 12:00 49 29 78 00:00 01:00 23 5
0:15 00 0 12:15 45 47 92 01:00 02:00 15 6
0:30 01 1 12:30 46 41 87 02:00 03:00 53 8
0:45 01 1 12:45 36 35 71 03:00 04:00 96 15
1:00 01 1 13:00 41 29 70 04:00 05:00 23 18 41
1:15 00 0 13:15 43 25 68 05:00 06:00 32 33 65
1:30 03 3 13:30 34 39 73 06:00 07:00 111 66 177
1:45 11 2 13:45 41 43 84 07:00 08:00 121 111 232
2:00 00 0 14:00 42 30 72 08:00 09:00 129 158 287
2:15 10 1 14:15 34 20 54 09:00 10:00 120 135 255
2:30 11 2 14:30 44 31 75 10:00 11:00 91 96 187
2:45 32 5 14:45 25 40 65 11:00 12:00 109 135 244
3:00 10 1 15:00 32 49 81 12:00 13:00 176 152 328
3:15 31 4 15:15 43 37 80 13:00 14:00 159 136 295
3:30 33 6 15:30 28 61 89 14:00 15:00 145 121 266
3:45 22 4 15:45 30 31 61 15:00 16:00 133 178 311
4:00 34 7 16:00 32 47 79 16:00 17:00 127 160 287
4:15 55 10 16:15 37 37 74 17:00 18:00 108 123 231
4:30 64 10 16:30 28 40 68 18:00 19:00 101 80 181
4:45 95 14 16:45 30 36 66 19:00 20:00 82 58 140
5:00 78 15 17:00 31 30 61 20:00 21:00 67 61 128
5:15 76 13 17:15 25 36 61 21:00 22:00 43 27 70
5:30 48 12 17:30 28 31 59 22:00 23:00 24 12 36
5:45 14 11 25 17:45 24 26 50 23:00 00:00 8 7 15
6:00 13 14 27 18:00 27 21 48
6:15 21 20 41 18:15 32 24 56 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 35 14 49 18:30 22 19 41 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 42 18 60 18:45 20 16 36 753 769 1522
7:00 22 20 42 19:00 27 19 46 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 34 26 60 19:15 19 13 32 150 167 317
7:30 24 26 50 19:30 17 14 31 0.872 0.908 0.932
7:45 41 39 80 19:45 19 12 31
8:00 43 42 85 20:00 19 21 40 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 33 46 79 20:15 18 9 27 1173 1115 2288
8:30 33 40 73 20:30 22 23 45 12:00 14:45 12:00
8:45 20 30 50 20:45 88 16 176 187 328
9:00 31 35 66 21:00 13 10 23 0.898 0.766 0.891
9:15 32 33 65 21:15 11 6 17
9:30 32 38 70 21:30 14 6 20 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 25 29 54 21:45 55 10 250 269 519
10:00 24 22 46 22:00 11 6 17 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 18 22 40 22:15 53 8 150 167 317
10:30 29 23 52 22:30 42 6 0.872 0.908 0.932
10:45 20 29 49 22:45 41 5
11:00 27 27 54 23:00 31 4 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 40 40 80 23:15 14 5 235 283 518
11:30 23 30 53 23:30 30 3 16:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 19 38 57 23:45 1 2 3 127 160 287
TOTALS 753 769 0 0 1522 TOTALS 1173 1115 0 0 2288 0.858 0.851 0.908 SPLIT % 49% 51% 0% 0% 40% SPLIT % 51% 49% 0% 0% 60%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Dominguez Rd Bet Pacific St & Granite Dr
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
381
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_003
NB SB EB WB Total
8,105 8,225 0 0 16,330

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 65 11 12:00 120 173 293 00:00 01:00 29 15 44
0:15 12 1 13 12:15 125 133 258 01:00 02:00 18 6 24
0:30 65 11 12:30 137 134 271 02:00 03:00 41 0 14
0:45 54 9 12:45 148 97 245 03:00 04:00 51 5 20
1:00 83 11 13:00 134 155 289 04:00 05:00 20 32 52
1:15 32 5 13:15 146 114 260 05:00 06:00 69 102 171
1:30 51 6 13:30 160 172 332 06:00 07:00 172 126 298
1:45 20 2 13:45 207 141 348 07:00 08:00 482 513 995
2:00 13 4 14:00 136 126 262 08:00 09:00 664 760 1424
2:15 13 4 14:15 129 111 240 09:00 10:00 376 392 768
2:30 11 2 14:30 112 122 234 10:00 11:00 344 347 691
2:45 13 4 14:45 134 120 254 11:00 12:00 405 479 884
3:00 04 4 15:00 163 155 318 12:00 13:00 530 537 1067
3:15 21 3 15:15 184 169 353 13:00 14:00 647 582 1229
3:30 12 3 15:30 150 245 395 14:00 15:00 511 479 990
3:45 28 10 15:45 145 164 309 15:00 16:00 642 733 1375
4:00 33 6 16:00 156 218 374 16:00 17:00 653 780 1433
4:15 36 9 16:15 141 202 343 17:00 18:00 654 791 1445
4:30 71 3 20 16:30 175 181 356 18:00 19:00 604 540 1144 4:45 71 0 17 16:45 181 179 360 19:00 20:00 471 389 860
5:00 51 7 22 17:00 171 260 431 20:00 21:00 385 243 628
5:15 13 36 49 17:15 169 215 384 21:00 22:00 236 225 461 5:30 17 22 39 17:30 159 161 320 22:00 23:00 134 88 222
5:45 34 27 61 17:45 155 155 310 23:00 00:00 50 41 91
6:00 27 20 47 18:00 169 161 330
6:15 39 29 68 18:15 142 124 266 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 49 32 81 18:30 160 109 269 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 57 45 102 18:45 133 146 279 2588 2797 5385
7:00 72 47 119 19:00 106 94 200 7:30 7:45 7:30
7:15 84 93 177 19:15 120 92 212 788 818 1597
7:30 124 166 290 19:30 136 113 249 0.714 0.921 0.815
7:45 202 207 409 19:45 109 90 199
8:00 276 214 490 20:00 129 68 197 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 186 222 408 20:15 111 87 198 5517 5428 10945
8:30 97 175 272 20:30 76 56 132 16:30 16:30 16:30
8:45 105 149 254 20:45 69 32 101 696 835 1531
9:00 92 111 203 21:00 86 78 164 0.961 0.803 0.888
9:15 110 102 212 21:15 62 59 121
9:30 87 96 183 21:30 57 54 111 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 87 83 170 21:45 31 34 65 1146 1273 2419
10:00 76 96 172 22:00 50 30 80 7:30 7:45 7:30
10:15 82 83 165 22:15 35 20 55 788 818 1597
10:30 72 77 149 22:30 29 23 52 0.714 0.921 0.815
10:45 114 91 205 22:45 20 15 35
11:00 80 110 190 23:00 16 10 26 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 115 102 217 23:15 13 12 25 1307 1571 2878
11:30 95 135 230 23:30 15 11 26 16:30 16:30 16:30
11:45 115 132 247 23:45 6 8 14 696 835 1531
TOTALS 2588 2797 0 0 5385 TOTALS 5517 5428 0 0 10945 0.961 0.803 0.888 SPLIT % 48% 52% 0% 0% 33% SPLIT % 50% 50% 0% 0% 67%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Lonetree Blvd Bet Blue Oaks Blvd & W Oaks Blvd
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Wednesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_004
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 1,813 1,946 3,759

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 20 2 12:00 25 36 61 00:00 01:00 32 5
0:15 00 0 12:15 28 14 42 01:00 02:00 43 7
0:30 01 1 12:30 24 29 53 02:00 03:00 21 3
0:45 11 2 12:45 19 23 42 03:00 04:00 33 6
1:00 21 3 13:00 24 31 55 04:00 05:00 55 10
1:15 11 2 13:15 26 32 58 05:00 06:00 13 14 27
1:30 10 1 13:30 33 24 57 06:00 07:00 46 45 91
1:45 01 1 13:45 35 25 60 07:00 08:00 103 156 259
2:00 01 1 14:00 36 43 79 08:00 09:00 176 152 328
2:15 00 0 14:15 29 47 76 09:00 10:00 79 83 162
2:30 10 1 14:30 50 33 83 10:00 11:00 91 69 160
2:45 10 1 14:45 32 43 75 11:00 12:00 107 114 221
3:00 11 2 15:00 31 52 83 12:00 13:00 96 102 198
3:15 00 0 15:15 19 61 80 13:00 14:00 118 112 230
3:30 01 1 15:30 43 56 99 14:00 15:00 147 166 313
3:45 21 3 15:45 56 46 102 15:00 16:00 149 215 364
4:00 21 3 16:00 56 53 109 16:00 17:00 160 172 332
4:15 10 1 16:15 43 48 91 17:00 18:00 168 173 341
4:30 12 3 16:30 24 25 49 18:00 19:00 131 121 252
4:45 12 3 16:45 37 46 83 19:00 20:00 80 94 174
5:00 23 5 17:00 46 48 94 20:00 21:00 79 91 170
5:15 43 7 17:15 38 45 83 21:00 22:00 31 28 59
5:30 34 7 17:30 42 45 87 22:00 23:00 13 16 29
5:45 4 4 8 17:45 42 35 77 23:00 00:00 9 9 18
6:00 78 15 18:00 38 43 81
6:15 58 13 18:15 39 29 68 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 14 28 18:30 31 27 58 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 20 15 35 18:45 23 22 45 632 647 1279
7:00 12 22 34 19:00 17 31 48 7:45 7:30 7:30
7:15 16 32 48 19:15 15 27 42 186 219 393
7:30 24 47 71 19:30 24 19 43 0.845 0.913 0.877
7:45 51 55 106 19:45 24 17 41
8:00 55 57 112 20:00 11 30 41 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 44 60 104 20:15 32 27 59 1181 1299 2480
8:30 36 20 56 20:30 18 15 33 15:30 15:15 15:30
8:45 41 15 56 20:45 18 19 37 198 216 401
9:00 26 17 43 21:00 57 12 0.884 0.885 0.920
9:15 14 20 34 21:15 14 12 26
9:30 19 19 38 21:30 77 14 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 20 27 47 21:45 52 7 279 308 587
10:00 20 17 37 22:00 17 8 7:45 7:30 7:30
10:15 23 20 43 22:15 65 11 186 219 393
10:30 29 10 39 22:30 20 2 0.845 0.913 0.877
10:45 19 22 41 22:45 44 8
11:00 20 31 51 23:00 64 10 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 36 30 66 23:15 02 2 328 345 673
11:30 23 18 41 23:30 32 5 17:00 16:45 16:45
11:45 28 35 63 23:45 0 1 1 168 184 347
TOTALS 0 0 632 647 1279 TOTALS 0 0 1181 1299 2480 0.913 0.958 0.923 SPLIT % 0% 0% 49% 51% 34% SPLIT % 0% 0% 48% 52% 66%
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Midas Ave Bet Argonaut Ave & Whitney Blvd
8/20/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
382
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_005
NB SB EB WB Total
524 676 0 0 1,200

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 00 0 12:00 81 4 22 00:00 01:00 20 2
0:15 10 1 12:15 54 9 01:00 02:00 01 1
0:30 00 0 12:30 95 14 02:00 03:00 11 2
0:45 10 1 12:45 77 14 03:00 04:00 02 2
1:00 01 1 13:00 48 12 04:00 05:00 06 6
1:15 00 0 13:15 97 16 05:00 06:00 37 10
1:30 00 0 13:30 51 4 19 06:00 07:00 93 9 48
1:45 00 0 13:45 51 2 17 07:00 08:00 30 50 80
2:00 00 0 14:00 12 11 23 08:00 09:00 42 64 106
2:15 10 1 14:15 10 10 20 09:00 10:00 27 33 60
2:30 01 1 14:30 57 12 10:00 11:00 33 49 82
2:45 00 0 14:45 49 13 11:00 12:00 27 47 74
3:00 00 0 15:00 12 9 21 12:00 13:00 29 30 59
3:15 01 1 15:15 14 7 21 13:00 14:00 23 41 64
3:30 00 0 15:30 71 3 20 14:00 15:00 31 37 68
3:45 01 1 15:45 81 1 19 15:00 16:00 41 40 81
4:00 01 1 16:00 11 6 17 16:00 17:00 43 45 88
4:15 01 1 16:15 17 10 27 17:00 18:00 43 52 95
4:30 01 1 16:30 81 7 25 18:00 19:00 43 30 73
4:45 03 3 16:45 71 2 19 19:00 20:00 41 46 87
5:00 02 2 17:00 11 12 23 20:00 21:00 28 34 62
5:15 21 3 17:15 12 8 20 21:00 22:00 12 12 24
5:30 04 4 17:30 91 2 21 22:00 23:00 11 9 20
5:45 1 0 1 17:45 11 20 31 23:00 00:00 5 1 6
6:00 34 7 18:00 69 15
6:15 21 4 16 18:15 11 6 17 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 09 9 18:30 13 9 22 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 41 2 16 18:45 13 6 19 174 299 473
7:00 61 1 17 19:00 15 12 27 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 81 1 19 19:15 78 15 45 67 112
7:30 91 5 24 19:30 86 14 0.750 0.798 0.824
7:45 71 3 20 19:45 11 20 31
8:00 13 21 34 20:00 91 0 19 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 15 17 32 20:15 58 13 350 377 727
8:30 10 16 26 20:30 11 9 20 18:15 17:00 17:00
8:45 41 0 14 20:45 37 10 52 52 95
9:00 69 15 21:00 37 10 0.867 0.650 0.766
9:15 58 13 21:15 32 5
9:30 67 13 21:30 42 6 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 10 9 19 21:45 21 3 72 114 186
10:00 11 15 26 22:00 01 1 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 99 18 22:15 44 8 45 67 112
10:30 71 5 22 22:30 33 6 0.750 0.798 0.824
10:45 61 0 16 22:45 41 5
11:00 45 9 23:00 20 2 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 81 5 23 23:15 10 1 86 97 183
11:30 51 5 20 23:30 10 1 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 10 12 22 23:45 1 1 2 43 52 95
TOTALS 174 299 0 0 473 TOTALS 350 377 0 0 727 0.632 0.650 0.766 SPLIT % 37% 63% 0% 0% 39% SPLIT % 48% 52% 0% 0% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Old Ranch House Rd Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & End
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Thursday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_006
NB SB EB WB Total
7,010 7,104 0 0 14,114

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 14 8 22 12:00 95 131 226 00:00 01:00 29 19 48
0:15 77 14 12:15 125 122 247 01:00 02:00 18 15 33
0:30 73 10 12:30 124 112 236 02:00 03:00 11 15 26
0:45 11 2 12:45 134 107 241 03:00 04:00 24 26 50
1:00 53 8 13:00 115 135 250 04:00 05:00 39 27 66
1:15 46 10 13:15 100 130 230 05:00 06:00 128 103 231
1:30 53 8 13:30 91 136 227 06:00 07:00 300 247 547
1:45 43 7 13:45 136 132 268 07:00 08:00 395 420 815
2:00 61 7 14:00 135 127 262 08:00 09:00 455 555 1010
2:15 05 5 14:15 135 139 274 09:00 10:00 376 459 835
2:30 03 3 14:30 137 158 295 10:00 11:00 422 410 832
2:45 56 11 14:45 124 157 281 11:00 12:00 479 502 981
3:00 54 9 15:00 133 154 287 12:00 13:00 478 472 950
3:15 11 6 17 15:15 143 111 254 13:00 14:00 442 533 975
3:30 32 5 15:30 132 138 270 14:00 15:00 531 581 1112
3:45 51 4 19 15:45 167 143 310 15:00 16:00 575 546 1121 4:00 53 8 16:00 136 180 316 16:00 17:00 565 623 1188
4:15 58 13 16:15 145 157 302 17:00 18:00 546 533 1079
4:30 65 11 16:30 136 157 293 18:00 19:00 391 336 727
4:45 23 11 34 16:45 148 129 277 19:00 20:00 320 239 559 5:00 16 18 34 17:00 153 132 285 20:00 21:00 244 202 446 5:15 21 24 45 17:15 139 137 276 21:00 22:00 124 119 243 5:30 38 34 72 17:30 139 143 282 22:00 23:00 79 86 165
5:45 53 27 80 17:45 115 121 236 23:00 00:00 39 36 75
6:00 55 43 98 18:00 102 99 201
6:15 65 59 124 18:15 107 83 190 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 68 62 130 18:30 95 78 173 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 112 83 195 18:45 87 76 163 2676 2798 5474
7:00 87 73 160 19:00 94 60 154 11:00 8:00 7:45
7:15 92 103 195 19:15 71 65 136 479 555 1019
7:30 93 112 205 19:30 81 60 141 0.907 0.895 0.944
7:45 123 132 255 19:45 74 54 128
8:00 105 124 229 20:00 70 63 133 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 134 136 270 20:15 74 55 129 4334 4306 8640
8:30 110 155 265 20:30 58 44 102 15:45 15:45 15:45
8:45 106 140 246 20:45 42 40 82 584 637 1221
9:00 110 109 219 21:00 50 42 92 0.874 0.885 0.966
9:15 83 111 194 21:15 29 36 65
9:30 82 128 210 21:30 20 21 41 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 101 111 212 21:45 25 20 45 850 975 1825
10:00 107 106 213 22:00 25 20 45 7:45 8:00 7:45
10:15 100 98 198 22:15 20 29 49 472 555 1019
10:30 92 98 190 22:30 15 19 34 0.881 0.895 0.944
10:45 123 108 231 22:45 19 18 37
11:00 132 130 262 23:00 12 6 18 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 117 111 228 23:15 12 9 21 1111 1156 2267
11:30 98 131 229 23:30 71 1 18 16:15 16:00 16:00
11:45 132 130 262 23:45 8 10 18 582 623 1188
TOTALS 2676 2798 0 0 5474 TOTALS 4334 4306 0 0 8640 0.951 0.865 0.940 SPLIT % 49% 51% 0% 0% 39% SPLIT % 50% 50% 0% 0% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Pacific St Bet Sunset Blvd & Americana Way/Sierra Meadows Dr 8/21/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
383
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_007
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 871 798 1,669

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 00 0 12:00 97 16 00:00 01:00 22 4
0:15 11 2 12:15 97 16 01:00 02:00 10 1
0:30 11 2 12:30 12 8 20 02:00 03:00 10 1
0:45 00 0 12:45 61 0 16 03:00 04:00 11 2
1:00 00 0 13:00 13 5 18 04:00 05:00 42 6
1:15 10 1 13:15 91 0 19 05:00 06:00 44 8
1:30 00 0 13:30 21 16 37 06:00 07:00 16 15 31
1:45 00 0 13:45 16 17 33 07:00 08:00 104 56 160
2:00 10 1 14:00 12 26 38 08:00 09:00 131 91 222
2:15 00 0 14:15 13 4 17 09:00 10:00 34 29 63
2:30 00 0 14:30 16 12 28 10:00 11:00 32 33 65
2:45 00 0 14:45 17 22 39 11:00 12:00 35 37 72
3:00 01 1 15:00 18 28 46 12:00 13:00 36 32 68
3:15 10 1 15:15 14 10 24 13:00 14:00 59 48 107
3:30 00 0 15:30 11 12 23 14:00 15:00 58 64 122
3:45 00 0 15:45 27 21 48 15:00 16:00 70 71 141
4:00 20 2 16:00 28 19 47 16:00 17:00 66 55 121
4:15 11 2 16:15 99 18 17:00 18:00 67 80 147
4:30 00 0 16:30 13 14 27 18:00 19:00 52 64 116
4:45 11 2 16:45 16 13 29 19:00 20:00 39 43 82
5:00 01 1 17:00 17 21 38 20:00 21:00 33 44 77
5:15 30 3 17:15 22 24 46 21:00 22:00 17 18 35
5:30 01 1 17:30 16 17 33 22:00 23:00 45 9
5:45 1 2 3 17:45 12 18 30 23:00 00:00 5 4 9
6:00 55 10 18:00 16 16 32
6:15 44 8 18:15 14 12 26 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 5 18:30 71 8 25 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 62 8 18:45 15 18 33 365 270 635
7:00 99 18 19:00 71 3 20 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 24 7 31 19:15 11 9 20 164 108 272
7:30 40 18 58 19:30 13 15 28 0.732 0.794 0.756
7:45 31 22 53 19:45 86 14
8:00 37 34 71 20:00 81 7 25 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 56 34 90 20:15 13 14 27 506 528 1034
8:30 18 16 34 20:30 46 10 15:15 17:00 17:00
8:45 20 7 27 20:45 87 15 80 80 147
9:00 10 9 19 21:00 76 13 0.714 0.833 0.799
9:15 94 13 21:15 51 0 15
9:30 96 15 21:30 31 4 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 61 0 16 21:45 21 3 235 147 382
10:00 11 9 20 22:00 10 1 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 95 14 22:15 13 4 164 108 272
10:30 56 11 22:30 10 1 0.732 0.794 0.756
10:45 71 3 20 22:45 12 3
11:00 87 15 23:00 31 4 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 11 11 22 23:15 10 1 133 135 268
11:30 86 14 23:30 00 0 16:45 17:00 17:00
11:45 8 13 21 23:45 1 3 4 71 80 147
TOTALS 0 0 365 270 635 TOTALS 0 0 506 528 1034 0.807 0.833 0.799 SPLIT % 0% 0% 57% 43% 38% SPLIT % 0% 0% 49% 51% 62%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Painted Pony Ln Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & W Oaks Blvd
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_008
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 1,239 1,551 2,790

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 16 7 12:00 16 16 32 00:00 01:00 21 2 14
0:15 13 4 12:15 10 23 33 01:00 02:00 24 6
0:30 00 0 12:30 14 25 39 02:00 03:00 41 5
0:45 03 3 12:45 16 20 36 03:00 04:00 32 5
1:00 01 1 13:00 19 14 33 04:00 05:00 82 10
1:15 00 0 13:15 15 24 39 05:00 06:00 20 9 29
1:30 13 4 13:30 15 22 37 06:00 07:00 47 25 72
1:45 10 1 13:45 15 24 39 07:00 08:00 192 183 375
2:00 00 0 14:00 15 26 41 08:00 09:00 82 70 152
2:15 10 1 14:15 18 49 67 09:00 10:00 61 70 131
2:30 20 2 14:30 35 71 106 10:00 11:00 64 78 142
2:45 11 2 14:45 95 36 131 11:00 12:00 59 75 134
3:00 11 2 15:00 23 30 53 12:00 13:00 56 84 140
3:15 00 0 15:15 18 16 34 13:00 14:00 64 84 148
3:30 11 2 15:30 18 21 39 14:00 15:00 163 182 345
3:45 10 1 15:45 24 28 52 15:00 16:00 83 95 178
4:00 00 0 16:00 15 33 48 16:00 17:00 85 157 242
4:15 20 2 16:15 17 37 54 17:00 18:00 65 150 215
4:30 41 5 16:30 37 44 81 18:00 19:00 60 88 148
4:45 21 3 16:45 16 43 59 19:00 20:00 43 74 117
5:00 31 4 17:00 26 40 66 20:00 21:00 36 50 86
5:15 50 5 17:15 15 36 51 21:00 22:00 24 32 56
5:30 77 14 17:30 11 39 50 22:00 23:00 12 16 28
5:45 5 1 6 17:45 13 35 48 23:00 00:00 4 8 12
6:00 52 7 18:00 14 19 33
6:15 13 7 20 18:15 18 29 47 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 14 10 24 18:30 13 18 31 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 15 6 21 18:45 15 22 37 544 531 1075
7:00 12 11 23 19:00 16 19 35 7:15 7:30 7:30
7:15 15 18 33 19:15 92 2 31 214 197 411
7:30 71 83 154 19:30 13 17 30 0.569 0.593 0.623
7:45 94 71 165 19:45 51 6 21
8:00 34 20 54 20:00 81 6 24 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 15 23 38 20:15 61 2 18 695 1020 1715
8:30 20 17 37 20:30 11 12 23 14:15 14:15 14:15
8:45 13 10 23 20:45 11 10 21 171 186 357
9:00 15 17 32 21:00 12 11 23 0.450 0.655 0.681
9:15 13 16 29 21:15 46 10
9:30 14 21 35 21:30 34 7 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 19 16 35 21:45 51 1 16 274 253 527
10:00 12 13 25 22:00 35 8 7:15 7:30 7:30
10:15 17 20 37 22:15 45 9 214 197 411
10:30 16 24 40 22:30 24 6 0.569 0.593 0.623
10:45 19 21 40 22:45 32 5
11:00 17 24 41 23:00 03 3 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 20 17 37 23:15 11 2 150 307 457
11:30 12 18 30 23:30 11 2 16:15 16:15 16:15
11:45 10 16 26 23:45 2 3 5 96 164 260
TOTALS 0 0 544 531 1075 TOTALS 0 0 695 1020 1715 0.649 0.932 0.802 SPLIT % 0% 0% 51% 49% 39% SPLIT % 0% 0% 41% 59% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Rocklin Rd Bet 5th St & Pacific St
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
384
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_009
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 10,227 9,345 19,572

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 13 10 23 12:00 190 194 384 00:00 01:00 38 35 73
0:15 11 11 22 12:15 178 170 348 01:00 02:00 22 19 41
0:30 10 10 20 12:30 169 164 333 02:00 03:00 16 19 35
0:45 44 8 12:45 159 170 329 03:00 04:00 27 13 40
1:00 65 11 13:00 144 145 289 04:00 05:00 62 46 108
1:15 54 9 13:15 190 161 351 05:00 06:00 117 67 184
1:30 65 11 13:30 168 171 339 06:00 07:00 291 164 455
1:45 55 10 13:45 182 189 371 07:00 08:00 674 419 1093
2:00 34 7 14:00 188 157 345 08:00 09:00 842 609 1451
2:15 76 13 14:15 154 192 346 09:00 10:00 649 511 1160
2:30 37 10 14:30 169 211 380 10:00 11:00 633 545 1178
2:45 32 5 14:45 222 181 403 11:00 12:00 682 621 1303
3:00 13 4 15:00 214 172 386 12:00 13:00 696 698 1394
3:15 33 6 15:15 178 188 366 13:00 14:00 684 666 1350
3:30 10 6 16 15:30 208 173 381 14:00 15:00 733 741 1474 3:45 13 1 14 15:45 174 187 361 15:00 16:00 774 720 1494 4:00 86 14 16:00 204 202 406 16:00 17:00 846 865 1711
4:15 17 10 27 16:15 190 201 391 17:00 18:00 775 811 1586 4:30 13 7 20 16:30 226 242 468 18:00 19:00 611 545 1156 4:45 24 23 47 16:45 226 220 446 19:00 20:00 397 424 821 5:00 22 8 30 17:00 223 229 452 20:00 21:00 301 375 676
5:15 25 16 41 17:15 209 193 402 21:00 22:00 221 254 475 5:30 26 21 47 17:30 166 159 325 22:00 23:00 88 106 194
5:45 44 22 66 17:45 177 230 407 23:00 00:00 48 72 120
6:00 60 29 89 18:00 171 137 308
6:15 62 28 90 18:15 159 151 310 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 68 49 117 18:30 165 130 295 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 101 58 159 18:45 116 127 243 4053 3068 7121
7:00 120 54 174 19:00 132 101 233 7:45 7:30 7:45
7:15 124 67 191 19:15 79 126 205 874 638 1502
7:30 199 133 332 19:30 105 89 194 0.946 0.826 0.948
7:45 231 165 396 19:45 81 108 189
8:00 202 193 395 20:00 78 100 178 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 217 147 364 20:15 83 100 183 6174 6277 12451
8:30 224 123 347 20:30 68 86 154 16:30 16:15 16:30
8:45 199 146 345 20:45 72 89 161 884 892 1768
9:00 181 155 336 21:00 109 85 194 0.978 0.921 0.944
9:15 148 123 271 21:15 52 69 121
9:30 153 103 256 21:30 30 53 83 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 167 130 297 21:45 30 47 77 1516 1028 2544
10:00 140 129 269 22:00 34 37 71 7:45 7:30 7:45
10:15 157 132 289 22:15 24 25 49 874 638 1502
10:30 149 145 294 22:30 14 26 40 0.946 0.826 0.948
10:45 187 139 326 22:45 16 18 34
11:00 167 159 326 23:00 15 15 30 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 145 120 265 23:15 11 20 31 1621 1676 3297
11:30 185 158 343 23:30 15 20 35 16:30 16:15 16:30
11:45 185 184 369 23:45 7 17 24 884 892 1768
TOTALS 0 0 4053 3068 7121 TOTALS 0 0 6174 6277 12451 0.978 0.921 0.944 SPLIT % 0% 0% 57% 43% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 50% 50% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Rocklin Rd Bet Pacific St & Granite Dr/Comfort Inn & Suites Rocklin-Roseville Access Dwy 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_010
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 1,960 2,014 3,974

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 12 3 12:00 29 27 56 00:00 01:00 56 11
0:15 10 1 12:15 29 27 56 01:00 02:00 32 5
0:30 23 5 12:30 34 30 64 02:00 03:00 22 4
0:45 11 2 12:45 29 32 61 03:00 04:00 12 3
1:00 12 3 13:00 44 24 68 04:00 05:00 41 6 20
1:15 00 0 13:15 41 25 66 05:00 06:00 11 39 50
1:30 00 0 13:30 28 26 54 06:00 07:00 39 92 131
1:45 20 2 13:45 38 29 67 07:00 08:00 50 195 245
2:00 11 2 14:00 32 42 74 08:00 09:00 138 199 337
2:15 11 2 14:15 32 40 72 09:00 10:00 87 125 212
2:30 00 0 14:30 40 41 81 10:00 11:00 89 110 199
2:45 00 0 14:45 64 36 100 11:00 12:00 94 104 198
3:00 11 2 15:00 41 28 69 12:00 13:00 121 116 237
3:15 00 0 15:15 44 26 70 13:00 14:00 151 104 255
3:30 01 1 15:30 27 42 69 14:00 15:00 168 159 327
3:45 00 0 15:45 45 33 78 15:00 16:00 157 129 286
4:00 12 3 16:00 35 41 76 16:00 17:00 152 165 317
4:15 34 7 16:15 37 53 90 17:00 18:00 199 150 349
4:30 04 4 16:30 36 30 66 18:00 19:00 149 94 243
4:45 06 6 16:45 44 41 85 19:00 20:00 127 84 211
5:00 38 11 17:00 41 37 78 20:00 21:00 97 68 165
5:15 28 10 17:15 64 40 104 21:00 22:00 67 32 99
5:30 21 5 17 17:30 44 31 75 22:00 23:00 32 14 46
5:45 4 8 12 17:45 50 42 92 23:00 00:00 17 7 24
6:00 51 4 19 18:00 44 19 63
6:15 51 7 22 18:15 42 26 68 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 12 28 40 18:30 32 23 55 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 17 33 50 18:45 31 26 57 523 892 1415
7:00 16 26 42 19:00 35 19 54 8:00 7:30 7:45
7:15 92 4 33 19:15 32 20 52 138 274 386
7:30 46 1 65 19:30 28 23 51 0.784 0.778 0.798
7:45 21 84 105 19:45 32 22 54
8:00 33 88 121 20:00 17 15 32 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 44 41 85 20:15 28 16 44 1437 1122 2559
8:30 36 39 75 20:30 23 13 36 17:15 15:30 17:00
8:45 25 31 56 20:45 29 24 53 202 169 349
9:00 23 38 61 21:00 17 9 26 0.789 0.797 0.839
9:15 24 37 61 21:15 25 7 32
9:30 21 24 45 21:30 14 11 25 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 19 26 45 21:45 11 5 16 188 394 582
10:00 18 26 44 22:00 11 8 19 8:00 7:30 7:45
10:15 18 22 40 22:15 64 10 138 274 386
10:30 30 30 60 22:30 90 9 0.784 0.778 0.798
10:45 23 32 55 22:45 62 8
11:00 17 24 41 23:00 42 6 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 29 30 59 23:15 22 4 351 315 666
11:30 17 22 39 23:30 53 8 17:00 16:00 17:00
11:45 31 28 59 23:45 6 0 6 199 165 349
TOTALS 0 0 523 892 1415 TOTALS 0 0 1437 1122 2559 0.777 0.778 0.839 SPLIT % 0% 0% 37% 63% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 56% 44% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Schriber Way Bet Sierra College Blvd & Lakepointe Dr
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
385
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_011
NB SB EB WB Total
17,531 18,274 0 0 35,805

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 78 15 12:00 347 401 748 00:00 01:00 32 28 60
0:15 84 12 12:15 360 353 713 01:00 02:00 25 19 44
0:30 81 1 19 12:30 421 330 751 02:00 03:00 37 18 55
0:45 95 14 12:45 403 306 709 03:00 04:00 42 26 68
1:00 53 8 13:00 336 378 714 04:00 05:00 77 55 132
1:15 11 4 15 13:15 366 413 779 05:00 06:00 195 234 429
1:30 44 8 13:30 364 385 749 06:00 07:00 452 558 1010
1:45 58 13 13:45 353 363 716 07:00 08:00 594 1070 1664
2:00 94 13 14:00 402 325 727 08:00 09:00 841 1190 2031
2:15 57 12 14:15 393 306 699 09:00 10:00 866 1201 2067
2:30 54 9 14:30 319 387 706 10:00 11:00 1092 1212 2304
2:45 18 3 21 14:45 330 380 710 11:00 12:00 1322 1259 2581 3:00 96 15 15:00 350 352 702 12:00 13:00 1531 1390 2921 3:15 98 17 15:15 352 344 696 13:00 14:00 1419 1539 2958 3:30 10 2 12 15:30 388 356 744 14:00 15:00 1444 1398 2842 3:45 14 10 24 15:45 350 356 706 15:00 16:00 1440 1408 2848 4:00 98 17 16:00 361 324 685 16:00 17:00 1442 1332 2774 4:15 18 11 29 16:15 368 305 673 17:00 18:00 1360 1342 2702 4:30 14 17 31 16:30 385 357 742 18:00 19:00 1046 1093 2139 4:45 36 19 55 16:45 328 346 674 19:00 20:00 869 722 1591 5:00 34 41 75 17:00 398 323 721 20:00 21:00 686 593 1279 5:15 29 49 78 17:15 347 355 702 21:00 22:00 393 354 747 5:30 51 68 119 17:30 317 355 672 22:00 23:00 225 175 400 5:45 81 76 157 17:45 298 309 607 23:00 00:00 101 58 159 6:00 83 94 177 18:00 306 294 600
6:15 88 132 220 18:15 266 299 565 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 120 159 279 18:30 253 269 522 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 161 173 334 18:45 221 231 452 5575 6870 12445
7:00 108 224 332 19:00 218 209 427 11:00 10:30 11:00
7:15 148 293 441 19:15 232 183 415 1322 1280 2581
7:30 148 286 434 19:30 222 186 408 0.934 0.858 0.953
7:45 190 267 457 19:45 197 144 341
8:00 189 273 462 20:00 190 173 363 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 219 297 516 20:15 160 141 301 11956 11404 23360
8:30 216 321 537 20:30 163 145 308 12:00 13:00 13:15
8:45 217 299 516 20:45 173 134 307 1531 1539 2971
9:00 189 342 531 21:00 136 110 246 0.909 0.932 0.953
9:15 211 310 521 21:15 103 92 195
9:30 231 277 508 21:30 88 88 176 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 235 272 507 21:45 66 64 130 1435 2260 3695
10:00 223 246 469 22:00 82 63 145 8:00 8:00 8:00
10:15 292 282 574 22:15 56 44 100 841 1190 2031
10:30 276 373 649 22:30 52 36 88 0.960 0.927 0.946
10:45 301 311 612 22:45 35 32 67
11:00 354 276 630 23:00 33 20 53 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 323 320 643 23:15 30 10 40 2802 2674 5476
11:30 304 327 631 23:30 26 12 38 16:15 16:30 16:30
11:45 341 336 677 23:45 12 16 28 1479 1381 2839
TOTALS 5575 6870 0 0 12445 TOTALS 11956 11404 0 0 23360 0.929 0.967 0.957 SPLIT % 45% 55% 0% 0% 35% SPLIT % 51% 49% 0% 0% 65%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra College Blvd Bet Granite Dr & Bass Pro Dr/Dominguez Rd 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_012
NB SB EB WB Total
11,583 11,215 0 0 22,798

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 86 14 12:00 235 163 398 00:00 01:00 31 25 56
0:15 74 11 12:15 201 195 396 01:00 02:00 21 15 36
0:30 89 17 12:30 203 212 415 02:00 03:00 16 14 30
0:45 86 14 12:45 182 188 370 03:00 04:00 16 23 39
1:00 34 7 13:00 181 181 362 04:00 05:00 50 48 98
1:15 91 10 13:15 199 200 399 05:00 06:00 141 203 344
1:30 64 10 13:30 186 245 431 06:00 07:00 323 409 732
1:45 36 9 13:45 193 222 415 07:00 08:00 688 912 1600
2:00 44 8 14:00 230 201 431 08:00 09:00 900 980 1880
2:15 47 11 14:15 191 198 389 09:00 10:00 712 682 1394
2:30 11 2 14:30 202 222 424 10:00 11:00 730 614 1344
2:45 72 9 14:45 178 278 456 11:00 12:00 740 631 1371
3:00 16 7 15:00 274 234 508 12:00 13:00 821 758 1579
3:15 34 7 15:15 231 210 441 13:00 14:00 759 848 1607
3:30 64 10 15:30 242 197 439 14:00 15:00 801 899 1700
3:45 69 15 15:45 227 215 442 15:00 16:00 974 856 1830
4:00 69 15 16:00 273 186 459 16:00 17:00 1102 798 1900
4:15 68 14 16:15 257 205 462 17:00 18:00 981 761 1742
4:30 21 12 33 16:30 287 214 501 18:00 19:00 638 593 1231 4:45 17 19 36 16:45 285 193 478 19:00 20:00 428 408 836 5:00 22 32 54 17:00 284 203 487 20:00 21:00 347 353 700 5:15 19 49 68 17:15 248 191 439 21:00 22:00 216 240 456 5:30 39 56 95 17:30 242 206 448 22:00 23:00 94 94 188
5:45 61 66 127 17:45 207 161 368 23:00 00:00 54 51 105
6:00 60 71 131 18:00 206 152 358
6:15 65 91 156 18:15 185 149 334 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 92 108 200 18:30 140 164 304 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 106 139 245 18:45 107 128 235 4368 4556 8924
7:00 113 179 292 19:00 113 114 227 8:15 7:30 7:30
7:15 150 234 384 19:15 110 77 187 945 1104 1994
7:30 212 227 439 19:30 110 106 216 0.862 0.791 0.923
7:45 213 272 485 19:45 95 111 206
8:00 191 349 540 20:00 89 101 190 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 274 256 530 20:15 90 84 174 7215 6659 13874
8:30 218 221 439 20:30 85 89 174 16:15 14:30 16:15
8:45 217 154 371 20:45 83 79 162 1113 944 1928
9:00 236 143 379 21:00 61 68 129 0.970 0.849 0.962
9:15 172 188 360 21:15 64 71 135
9:30 140 174 314 21:30 47 63 110 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 164 177 341 21:45 44 38 82 1588 1892 3480
10:00 145 132 277 22:00 31 33 64 8:00 7:30 7:30
10:15 162 158 320 22:15 36 27 63 900 1104 1994
10:30 227 145 372 22:30 16 21 37 0.821 0.791 0.923
10:45 196 179 375 22:45 11 13 24
11:00 187 173 360 23:00 81 8 26 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 175 149 324 23:15 13 17 30 2083 1559 3642
11:30 174 157 331 23:30 16 8 24 16:15 16:15 16:15
11:45 204 152 356 23:45 17 8 25 1113 815 1928
TOTALS 4368 4556 0 0 8924 TOTALS 7215 6659 0 0 13874 0.970 0.952 0.962 SPLIT % 49% 51% 0% 0% 39% SPLIT % 52% 48% 0% 0% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Sierra College Blvd Bet Rocklin Rd & Scarborough Dr/King Ranch Pl 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
386
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_013
NB SB EB WB Total
1,815 1,550 0 0 3,365

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 22 4 12:00 36 23 59 00:00 01:00 54 9
0:15 22 4 12:15 25 17 42 01:00 02:00 13 4
0:30 10 1 12:30 26 18 44 02:00 03:00 20 2
0:45 00 0 12:45 19 23 42 03:00 04:00 12 3
1:00 00 0 13:00 34 15 49 04:00 05:00 57 12
1:15 01 1 13:15 26 23 49 05:00 06:00 35 26 61
1:30 02 2 13:30 35 40 75 06:00 07:00 37 38 75
1:45 10 1 13:45 24 30 54 07:00 08:00 81 143 224
2:00 00 0 14:00 23 26 49 08:00 09:00 193 194 387
2:15 10 1 14:15 21 26 47 09:00 10:00 75 78 153
2:30 10 1 14:30 34 27 61 10:00 11:00 81 75 156
2:45 00 0 14:45 29 27 56 11:00 12:00 92 96 188
3:00 01 1 15:00 36 22 58 12:00 13:00 106 81 187
3:15 00 0 15:15 45 34 79 13:00 14:00 119 108 227
3:30 10 1 15:30 60 27 87 14:00 15:00 107 106 213
3:45 01 1 15:45 39 63 102 15:00 16:00 180 146 326
4:00 00 0 16:00 50 32 82 16:00 17:00 144 109 253
4:15 01 1 16:15 24 24 48 17:00 18:00 132 110 242
4:30 31 4 16:30 33 27 60 18:00 19:00 110 80 190
4:45 25 7 16:45 37 26 63 19:00 20:00 123 45 168
5:00 24 6 17:00 34 29 63 20:00 21:00 82 45 127
5:15 47 11 17:15 31 23 54 21:00 22:00 47 27 74
5:30 12 8 20 17:30 36 34 70 22:00 23:00 35 17 52
5:45 17 7 24 17:45 31 24 55 23:00 00:00 22 10 32
6:00 11 8 19 18:00 37 23 60
6:15 13 6 19 18:15 33 23 56 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 48 12 18:30 18 22 40 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 91 6 25 18:45 22 12 34 608 666 1274
7:00 81 4 22 19:00 28 13 41 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 16 25 41 19:15 36 14 50 209 228 437
7:30 22 44 66 19:30 33 7 40 0.594 0.851 0.821
7:45 35 60 95 19:45 26 11 37
8:00 40 56 96 20:00 17 17 34 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 88 45 133 20:15 27 11 38 1207 884 2091
8:30 46 67 113 20:30 24 12 36 15:15 15:15 15:15
8:45 19 26 45 20:45 14 5 19 194 156 350
9:00 25 21 46 21:00 21 8 29 0.808 0.619 0.858
9:15 17 17 34 21:15 98 17
9:30 16 21 37 21:30 91 10 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 17 19 36 21:45 81 0 18 274 337 611
10:00 18 26 44 22:00 11 3 14 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 15 17 32 22:15 13 8 21 209 228 437
10:30 26 12 38 22:30 54 9 0.594 0.851 0.821
10:45 22 20 42 22:45 62 8
11:00 17 19 36 23:00 62 8 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 19 23 42 23:15 65 11 276 219 495
11:30 31 24 55 23:30 42 6 16:00 16:45 16:00
11:45 25 30 55 23:45 6 1 7 144 112 253
TOTALS 608 666 0 0 1274 TOTALS 1207 884 0 0 2091 0.720 0.824 0.771 SPLIT % 48% 52% 0% 0% 38% SPLIT % 58% 42% 0% 0% 62%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
University Ave Bet Sunset Blvd & Whitney Ranch Pkwy
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_014
NB SB EB WB Total
2,767 2,886 0 0 5,653

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 42 6 12:00 32 38 70 00:00 01:00 18 9 27
0:15 42 6 12:15 24 32 56 01:00 02:00 15 8 23
0:30 42 6 12:30 44 43 87 02:00 03:00 73 10
0:45 63 9 12:45 39 37 76 03:00 04:00 51 2 17
1:00 53 8 13:00 34 41 75 04:00 05:00 61 6 22
1:15 52 7 13:15 43 43 86 05:00 06:00 14 70 84
1:30 33 6 13:30 43 50 93 06:00 07:00 37 112 149
1:45 20 2 13:45 40 52 92 07:00 08:00 179 241 420
2:00 10 1 14:00 36 48 84 08:00 09:00 316 317 633
2:15 20 2 14:15 57 34 91 09:00 10:00 123 147 270
2:30 32 5 14:30 66 52 118 10:00 11:00 118 142 260
2:45 11 2 14:45 51 41 92 11:00 12:00 122 145 267
3:00 01 1 15:00 63 53 116 12:00 13:00 139 150 289
3:15 06 6 15:15 63 58 121 13:00 14:00 160 186 346
3:30 21 3 15:30 77 66 143 14:00 15:00 210 175 385
3:45 34 7 15:45 63 136 199 15:00 16:00 266 313 579
4:00 22 4 16:00 51 63 114 16:00 17:00 171 208 379
4:15 04 4 16:15 59 45 104 17:00 18:00 205 205 410
4:30 26 8 16:30 30 54 84 18:00 19:00 176 132 308
4:45 24 6 16:45 31 46 77 19:00 20:00 141 86 227
5:00 11 1 12 17:00 46 63 109 20:00 21:00 123 85 208
5:15 41 7 21 17:15 51 43 94 21:00 22:00 118 60 178
5:30 31 9 22 17:30 66 45 111 22:00 23:00 63 40 103
5:45 6 23 29 17:45 42 54 96 23:00 00:00 35 24 59
6:00 52 3 28 18:00 51 39 90
6:15 42 3 27 18:15 52 29 81 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 11 32 43 18:30 42 43 85 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 17 34 51 18:45 31 21 52 960 1222 2182
7:00 22 50 72 19:00 43 26 69 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 44 55 99 19:15 31 18 49 340 336 676
7:30 46 65 111 19:30 31 22 53 0.733 0.764 0.824
7:45 67 71 138 19:45 36 20 56
8:00 62 82 144 20:00 32 29 61 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 116 73 189 20:15 27 21 48 1807 1664 3471
8:30 95 110 205 20:30 35 19 54 15:00 15:15 15:00
8:45 43 52 95 20:45 29 16 45 266 323 579
9:00 36 34 70 21:00 37 14 51 0.864 0.594 0.727
9:15 31 36 67 21:15 28 15 43
9:30 28 32 60 21:30 25 13 38 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 28 45 73 21:45 28 18 46 495 558 1053
10:00 27 38 65 22:00 21 13 34 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 19 41 60 22:15 20 15 35 340 336 676
10:30 38 29 67 22:30 11 8 19 0.733 0.764 0.824
10:45 34 34 68 22:45 11 4 15
11:00 31 30 61 23:00 99 18 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 29 27 56 23:15 12 8 20 376 413 789
11:30 35 38 73 23:30 53 8 17:00 16:00 17:00
11:45 27 50 77 23:45 9 4 13 205 208 410
TOTALS 960 1222 0 0 2182 TOTALS 1807 1664 0 0 3471 0.777 0.825 0.923 SPLIT % 44% 56% 0% 0% 39% SPLIT % 52% 48% 0% 0% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
University Ave Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & W Ranch View Dr/Ranch View Dr 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
387
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_015
NB SB EB WB Total
4,971 4,887 0 0 9,858

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 73 10 12:00 66 47 113 00:00 01:00 24 11 35
0:15 83 11 12:15 65 50 115 01:00 02:00 91 4 23
0:30 72 9 12:30 61 72 133 02:00 03:00 31 4
0:45 23 5 12:45 59 58 117 03:00 04:00 31 1 14
1:00 14 5 13:00 60 76 136 04:00 05:00 61 8 24
1:15 33 6 13:15 85 60 145 05:00 06:00 13 87 100
1:30 43 7 13:30 108 60 168 06:00 07:00 70 172 242
1:45 14 5 13:45 90 85 175 07:00 08:00 271 522 793
2:00 21 3 14:00 93 99 192 08:00 09:00 364 591 955
2:15 00 0 14:15 80 80 160 09:00 10:00 170 238 408
2:30 10 1 14:30 81 80 161 10:00 11:00 171 207 378
2:45 00 0 14:45 154 78 232 11:00 12:00 229 228 457
3:00 30 3 15:00 89 108 197 12:00 13:00 251 227 478
3:15 01 1 15:15 90 83 173 13:00 14:00 343 281 624
3:30 00 0 15:30 91 107 198 14:00 15:00 408 337 745
3:45 01 0 10 15:45 112 126 238 15:00 16:00 382 424 806
4:00 13 4 16:00 127 107 234 16:00 17:00 432 408 840
4:15 13 4 16:15 109 88 197 17:00 18:00 498 409 907
4:30 22 4 16:30 99 95 194 18:00 19:00 427 284 711
4:45 21 0 12 16:45 97 118 215 19:00 20:00 354 185 539
5:00 11 5 16 17:00 147 100 247 20:00 21:00 280 119 399
5:15 22 4 26 17:15 132 104 236 21:00 22:00 153 66 219
5:30 32 4 27 17:30 111 99 210 22:00 23:00 75 31 106
5:45 7 24 31 17:45 108 106 214 23:00 00:00 35 16 51
6:00 92 4 33 18:00 109 73 182
6:15 15 32 47 18:15 113 88 201 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 22 40 62 18:30 102 55 157 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 24 76 100 18:45 103 68 171 1333 2100 3433
7:00 35 69 104 19:00 97 53 150 7:45 7:30 7:30
7:15 32 133 165 19:15 91 55 146 437 666 1100
7:30 70 181 251 19:30 102 38 140 0.815 0.793 0.881
7:45 134 139 273 19:45 64 39 103
8:00 128 136 264 20:00 88 24 112 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 102 210 312 20:15 87 31 118 3638 2787 6425
8:30 73 134 207 20:30 58 39 97 17:00 15:30 16:45
8:45 61 111 172 20:45 47 25 72 498 428 908
9:00 36 71 107 21:00 54 19 73 0.847 0.849 0.919
9:15 43 52 95 21:15 41 17 58
9:30 44 59 103 21:30 31 21 52 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 47 56 103 21:45 27 9 36 635 1113 1748
10:00 52 50 102 22:00 23 9 32 7:45 7:30 7:30
10:15 41 48 89 22:15 17 6 23 437 666 1100
10:30 37 49 86 22:30 23 7 30 0.815 0.793 0.881
10:45 41 60 101 22:45 12 9 21
11:00 53 42 95 23:00 12 4 16 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 58 60 118 23:15 82 10 930 817 1747
11:30 54 70 124 23:30 10 3 13 17:00 16:45 16:45
11:45 64 56 120 23:45 5 7 12 498 421 908
TOTALS 1333 2100 0 0 3433 TOTALS 3638 2787 0 0 6425 0.847 0.892 0.919 SPLIT % 39% 61% 0% 0% 35% SPLIT % 57% 43% 0% 0% 65%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
W Oaks Blvd Bet Stanford Ranch Rd/W Stanford Ranch Rd & Hunter Dr/Hunter Ct 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_016
NB SB EB WB Total
4,283 4,211 0 0 8,494

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 63 9 12:00 59 41 100 00:00 01:00 22 10 32
0:15 83 11 12:15 57 44 101 01:00 02:00 69 15
0:30 63 9 12:30 48 62 110 02:00 03:00 21 3
0:45 21 3 12:45 52 39 91 03:00 04:00 31 0 13
1:00 14 5 13:00 49 69 118 04:00 05:00 61 5 21
1:15 12 3 13:15 74 47 121 05:00 06:00 97 1 80
1:30 31 4 13:30 97 52 149 06:00 07:00 65 125 190
1:45 12 3 13:45 74 82 156 07:00 08:00 224 425 649
2:00 11 2 14:00 92 86 178 08:00 09:00 348 531 879
2:15 00 0 14:15 62 73 135 09:00 10:00 150 202 352
2:30 10 1 14:30 78 55 133 10:00 11:00 147 179 326
2:45 00 0 14:45 125 72 197 11:00 12:00 189 184 373
3:00 30 3 15:00 75 102 177 12:00 13:00 216 186 402
3:15 01 1 15:15 79 70 149 13:00 14:00 294 250 544
3:30 00 0 15:30 72 96 168 14:00 15:00 357 286 643
3:45 09 9 15:45 98 124 222 15:00 16:00 324 392 716
4:00 13 4 16:00 115 93 208 16:00 17:00 382 353 735
4:15 13 4 16:15 92 80 172 17:00 18:00 403 355 758
4:30 22 4 16:30 92 76 168 18:00 19:00 367 257 624
4:45 27 9 16:45 83 104 187 19:00 20:00 312 164 476
5:00 01 2 12 17:00 123 90 213 20:00 21:00 237 105 342
5:15 01 8 18 17:15 110 88 198 21:00 22:00 135 63 198
5:30 42 2 26 17:30 87 85 172 22:00 23:00 59 24 83
5:45 5 19 24 17:45 83 92 175 23:00 00:00 26 14 40
6:00 91 6 25 18:00 90 71 161
6:15 14 25 39 18:15 98 77 175 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 20 28 48 18:30 90 47 137 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 22 56 78 18:45 89 62 151 1171 1762 2933
7:00 29 55 84 19:00 87 48 135 7:45 7:30 7:30
7:15 32 107 139 19:15 73 48 121 402 598 985
7:30 52 142 194 19:30 96 34 130 0.779 0.726 0.818
7:45 111 121 232 19:45 56 34 90
8:00 129 129 258 20:00 78 20 98 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 95 206 301 20:15 77 25 102 3112 2449 5561
8:30 67 106 173 20:30 50 36 86 16:30 15:30 15:30
8:45 57 90 147 20:45 32 24 56 408 393 770
9:00 35 63 98 21:00 46 21 67 0.829 0.792 0.867
9:15 34 42 76 21:15 39 14 53
9:30 39 51 90 21:30 28 20 48 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 42 46 88 21:45 22 8 30 572 956 1528
10:00 41 42 83 22:00 17 7 24 7:45 7:30 7:30
10:15 41 45 86 22:15 13 4 17 402 598 985
10:30 29 39 68 22:30 19 7 26 0.779 0.726 0.818
10:45 36 53 89 22:45 10 6 16
11:00 45 34 79 23:00 93 12 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 50 49 99 23:15 52 7 785 708 1493
11:30 46 62 108 23:30 92 11 16:30 16:45 16:45
11:45 48 39 87 23:45 3 7 10 408 367 770
TOTALS 1171 1762 0 0 2933 TOTALS 3112 2449 0 0 5561 0.829 0.882 0.904 SPLIT % 40% 60% 0% 0% 35% SPLIT % 56% 44% 0% 0% 65%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
W Oaks Blvd Bet Hunter Dr/Hunter Ct & Painted Pony Ln
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
388
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_017
NB SB EB WB Total
2,880 3,441 0 0 6,321

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 62 8 12:00 38 43 81 00:00 01:00 99 18
0:15 12 3 12:15 44 50 94 01:00 02:00 33 6
0:30 25 7 12:30 49 63 112 02:00 03:00 14 5
0:45 00 0 12:45 52 55 107 03:00 04:00 41 0 14
1:00 03 3 13:00 49 52 101 04:00 05:00 31 9 22
1:15 00 0 13:15 50 51 101 05:00 06:00 10 74 84
1:30 20 2 13:30 48 42 90 06:00 07:00 39 206 245
1:45 10 1 13:45 55 58 113 07:00 08:00 115 324 439
2:00 00 0 14:00 60 61 121 08:00 09:00 149 371 520
2:15 00 0 14:15 58 57 115 09:00 10:00 123 248 371
2:30 02 2 14:30 54 58 112 10:00 11:00 159 246 405
2:45 12 3 14:45 46 74 120 11:00 12:00 153 196 349
3:00 11 2 15:00 93 74 167 12:00 13:00 183 211 394
3:15 12 3 15:15 74 46 120 13:00 14:00 202 203 405
3:30 10 1 15:30 67 67 134 14:00 15:00 218 250 468
3:45 17 8 15:45 68 50 118 15:00 16:00 302 237 539
4:00 20 2 16:00 77 47 124 16:00 17:00 323 221 544
4:15 04 4 16:15 84 63 147 17:00 18:00 291 188 479
4:30 16 7 16:30 80 54 134 18:00 19:00 206 161 367
4:45 09 9 16:45 82 57 139 19:00 20:00 134 99 233
5:00 09 9 17:00 78 41 119 20:00 21:00 123 87 210
5:15 11 7 18 17:15 77 48 125 21:00 22:00 75 40 115
5:30 42 7 31 17:30 72 60 132 22:00 23:00 38 25 63
5:45 5 21 26 17:45 64 39 103 23:00 00:00 17 9 26
6:00 64 3 49 18:00 49 39 88
6:15 11 40 51 18:15 58 42 100 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 10 60 70 18:30 55 43 98 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 12 63 75 18:45 44 37 81 768 1710 2478
7:00 17 75 92 19:00 43 31 74 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 28 76 104 19:15 31 19 50 163 382 545
7:30 36 87 123 19:30 29 27 56 0.815 0.884 0.902
7:45 34 86 120 19:45 31 22 53
8:00 50 101 151 20:00 41 20 61 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 43 108 151 20:15 30 23 53 2112 1731 3843
8:30 30 81 111 20:30 32 25 57 16:15 14:15 16:00
8:45 26 81 107 20:45 20 19 39 324 263 544
9:00 38 65 103 21:00 21 16 37 0.964 0.889 0.925
9:15 29 61 90 21:15 23 10 33
9:30 23 51 74 21:30 19 11 30 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 33 71 104 21:45 12 3 15 264 695 959
10:00 36 62 98 22:00 89 17 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 37 45 82 22:15 14 6 20 163 382 545
10:30 41 68 109 22:30 99 18 0.815 0.884 0.902
10:45 45 71 116 22:45 71 8
11:00 29 45 74 23:00 64 10 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 44 54 98 23:15 60 6 614 409 1023
11:30 41 47 88 23:30 22 4 16:15 16:00 16:00
11:45 39 50 89 23:45 3 3 6 324 221 544
TOTALS 768 1710 0 0 2478 TOTALS 2112 1731 0 0 3843 0.964 0.877 0.925 SPLIT % 31% 69% 0% 0% 39% SPLIT % 55% 45% 0% 0% 61%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Whitney Blvd Bet Midas Ave & Sunset Blvd
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_018
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 4,757 5,421 10,178

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 86 14 12:00 68 94 162 00:00 01:00 30 19 49
0:15 11 4 15 12:15 63 52 115 01:00 02:00 11 8 19
0:30 54 9 12:30 56 66 122 02:00 03:00 33 6
0:45 65 11 12:45 67 71 138 03:00 04:00 51 3 18
1:00 11 2 13:00 74 65 139 04:00 05:00 13 71 84
1:15 83 11 13:15 57 75 132 05:00 06:00 36 151 187
1:30 23 5 13:30 72 96 168 06:00 07:00 87 335 422
1:45 01 1 13:45 70 79 149 07:00 08:00 247 431 678
2:00 10 1 14:00 75 88 163 08:00 09:00 450 450 900
2:15 11 2 14:15 72 79 151 09:00 10:00 185 278 463
2:30 00 0 14:30 67 78 145 10:00 11:00 165 310 475
2:45 12 3 14:45 90 67 157 11:00 12:00 219 290 509
3:00 32 5 15:00 95 99 194 12:00 13:00 254 283 537
3:15 04 4 15:15 108 88 196 13:00 14:00 273 315 588
3:30 12 3 15:30 112 103 215 14:00 15:00 304 312 616
3:45 15 6 15:45 100 140 240 15:00 16:00 415 430 845
4:00 39 12 16:00 91 85 176 16:00 17:00 371 322 693
4:15 21 4 16 16:15 90 72 162 17:00 18:00 434 341 775
4:30 31 3 16 16:30 94 72 166 18:00 19:00 366 344 710
4:45 53 5 40 16:45 96 93 189 19:00 20:00 314 267 581
5:00 11 22 33 17:00 113 72 185 20:00 21:00 264 234 498
5:15 43 2 36 17:15 85 89 174 21:00 22:00 171 128 299
5:30 54 5 50 17:30 115 79 194 22:00 23:00 84 57 141
5:45 16 52 68 17:45 121 101 222 23:00 00:00 56 29 85
6:00 16 55 71 18:00 98 96 194
6:15 10 75 85 18:15 89 90 179 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 29 96 125 18:30 100 79 179 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 32 109 141 18:45 79 79 158 1451 2359 3810
7:00 49 116 165 19:00 72 71 143 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 60 97 157 19:15 72 67 139 472 487 959
7:30 66 99 165 19:30 82 59 141 0.742 0.801 0.771
7:45 72 119 191 19:45 88 70 158
8:00 147 81 228 20:00 73 54 127 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 159 152 311 20:15 72 59 131 3306 3062 6368
8:30 94 135 229 20:30 59 67 126 17:00 15:00 15:00
8:45 50 82 132 20:45 60 54 114 434 430 845
9:00 45 59 104 21:00 52 60 112 0.897 0.768 0.880
9:15 42 63 105 21:15 49 29 78
9:30 41 74 115 21:30 36 24 60 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 57 82 139 21:45 34 15 49 697 881 1578
10:00 42 93 135 22:00 25 18 43 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 40 91 131 22:15 20 18 38 472 487 959
10:30 43 73 116 22:30 21 11 32 0.742 0.801 0.771
10:45 40 53 93 22:45 18 10 28
11:00 52 57 109 23:00 18 10 28 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 54 74 128 23:15 12 7 19 805 663 1468
11:30 56 80 136 23:30 15 5 20 17:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 57 79 136 23:45 11 7 18 434 341 775
TOTALS 0 0 1451 2359 3810 TOTALS 0 0 3306 3062 6368 0.897 0.844 0.873 SPLIT % 0% 0% 38% 62% 37% SPLIT % 0% 0% 52% 48% 63%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Hwy 65 & Wildcat Blvd
8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
389
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_019
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 3,508 3,650 7,158

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 34 7 12:00 53 52 105 00:00 01:00 12 15 27
0:15 23 5 12:15 56 39 95 01:00 02:00 53 8
0:30 35 8 12:30 38 43 81 02:00 03:00 12 3
0:45 43 7 12:45 49 48 97 03:00 04:00 17 8
1:00 11 2 13:00 43 38 81 04:00 05:00 22 4 26
1:15 11 2 13:15 40 51 91 05:00 06:00 21 63 84
1:30 21 3 13:30 61 52 113 06:00 07:00 61 155 216
1:45 10 1 13:45 77 68 145 07:00 08:00 218 247 465
2:00 00 0 14:00 54 81 135 08:00 09:00 393 467 860
2:15 10 1 14:15 65 39 104 09:00 10:00 133 146 279
2:30 00 0 14:30 61 49 110 10:00 11:00 132 218 350
2:45 02 2 14:45 86 58 144 11:00 12:00 160 167 327
3:00 01 1 15:00 52 146 198 12:00 13:00 196 182 378
3:15 02 2 15:15 50 74 124 13:00 14:00 221 209 430
3:30 12 3 15:30 71 96 167 14:00 15:00 266 227 493
3:45 02 2 15:45 132 79 211 15:00 16:00 305 395 700
4:00 12 3 16:00 98 53 151 16:00 17:00 281 229 510
4:15 15 6 16:15 62 63 125 17:00 18:00 276 259 535
4:30 07 7 16:30 65 59 124 18:00 19:00 226 211 437
4:45 01 0 10 16:45 56 54 110 19:00 20:00 201 167 368
5:00 21 3 15 17:00 80 61 141 20:00 21:00 191 126 317
5:15 41 2 16 17:15 56 48 104 21:00 22:00 124 76 200
5:30 12 2 23 17:30 67 69 136 22:00 23:00 61 35 96
5:45 14 16 30 17:45 73 81 154 23:00 00:00 21 20 41
6:00 72 3 30 18:00 64 67 131
6:15 11 35 46 18:15 57 52 109 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 20 48 68 18:30 60 47 107 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 23 49 72 18:45 45 45 90 1139 1514 2653
7:00 39 56 95 19:00 55 52 107 7:45 7:45 7:45
7:15 48 47 95 19:15 43 41 84 401 492 893
7:30 67 71 138 19:30 51 33 84 0.721 0.577 0.706
7:45 64 73 137 19:45 52 41 93
8:00 139 90 229 20:00 60 34 94 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 103 213 316 20:15 48 29 77 2369 2136 4505
8:30 95 116 211 20:30 49 32 81 15:30 15:00 15:00
8:45 56 48 104 20:45 34 31 65 363 395 700
9:00 30 29 59 21:00 40 29 69 0.688 0.676 0.829
9:15 34 39 73 21:15 28 16 44
9:30 36 44 80 21:30 32 18 50 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 33 34 67 21:45 24 13 37 611 714 1325
10:00 35 66 101 22:00 14 8 22 7:45 7:45 7:45
10:15 30 53 83 22:15 17 10 27 401 492 893
10:30 29 51 80 22:30 19 8 27 0.721 0.577 0.706
10:45 38 48 86 22:45 11 9 20
11:00 32 37 69 23:00 99 18 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 36 40 76 23:15 22 4 557 488 1045
11:30 33 45 78 23:30 73 10 16:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 59 45 104 23:45 3 6 9 281 259 535
TOTALS 0 0 1139 1514 2653 TOTALS 0 0 2369 2136 4505 0.717 0.799 0.869 SPLIT % 0% 0% 43% 57% 37% SPLIT % 0% 0% 53% 47% 63%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Wildcat Blvd & Painted Pony Ln/Old Ranch House Rd 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_020
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 2,462 2,469 4,931

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 31 4 12:00 39 38 77 00:00 01:00 91 0 19
0:15 22 4 12:15 33 29 62 01:00 02:00 40 4
0:30 33 6 12:30 37 25 62 02:00 03:00 01 1
0:45 14 5 12:45 27 35 62 03:00 04:00 24 6
1:00 10 1 13:00 32 33 65 04:00 05:00 41 0 14
1:15 00 0 13:15 29 33 62 05:00 06:00 17 45 62
1:30 20 2 13:30 31 52 83 06:00 07:00 52 88 140
1:45 10 1 13:45 51 43 94 07:00 08:00 194 201 395
2:00 00 0 14:00 79 29 108 08:00 09:00 192 279 471
2:15 00 0 14:15 43 52 95 09:00 10:00 106 132 238
2:30 00 0 14:30 44 53 97 10:00 11:00 95 118 213
2:45 01 1 14:45 44 66 110 11:00 12:00 108 124 232
3:00 10 1 15:00 73 44 117 12:00 13:00 136 127 263
3:15 00 0 15:15 37 60 97 13:00 14:00 143 161 304
3:30 10 1 15:30 40 61 101 14:00 15:00 210 200 410
3:45 04 4 15:45 57 39 96 15:00 16:00 207 204 411
4:00 11 2 16:00 57 35 92 16:00 17:00 194 165 359
4:15 31 4 16:15 52 52 104 17:00 18:00 195 176 371
4:30 04 4 16:30 47 35 82 18:00 19:00 183 143 326
4:45 04 4 16:45 38 43 81 19:00 20:00 142 118 260
5:00 25 7 17:00 53 39 92 20:00 21:00 137 79 216
5:15 21 1 13 17:15 45 46 91 21:00 22:00 87 47 134
5:30 11 5 16 17:30 47 38 85 22:00 23:00 29 22 51
5:45 12 14 26 17:45 50 53 103 23:00 00:00 16 15 31
6:00 81 3 21 18:00 51 49 100
6:15 81 9 27 18:15 47 38 85 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 18 26 44 18:30 45 29 74 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 18 30 48 18:45 40 27 67 783 1012 1795
7:00 28 24 52 19:00 45 43 88 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 36 36 72 19:15 30 36 66 235 330 565
7:30 81 68 149 19:30 29 24 53 0.725 0.757 0.948
7:45 49 73 122 19:45 38 15 53
8:00 37 109 146 20:00 39 20 59 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 68 80 148 20:15 55 17 72 1679 1457 3136
8:30 50 45 95 20:30 26 24 50 13:45 14:45 14:45
8:45 37 45 82 20:45 17 18 35 217 231 425
9:00 26 29 55 21:00 25 14 39 0.687 0.875 0.908
9:15 25 41 66 21:15 24 11 35
9:30 26 36 62 21:30 20 9 29 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 29 26 55 21:45 18 13 31 386 480 866
10:00 27 27 54 22:00 87 15 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 25 32 57 22:15 95 14 235 330 565
10:30 20 32 52 22:30 84 12 0.725 0.757 0.948
10:45 23 27 50 22:45 46 10
11:00 28 29 57 23:00 94 13 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 21 30 51 23:15 23 5 389 341 730
11:30 28 31 59 23:30 44 8 17:00 17:00 17:00
11:45 31 34 65 23:45 1 4 5 195 176 371
TOTALS 0 0 783 1012 1795 TOTALS 0 0 1679 1457 3136 0.920 0.830 0.900 SPLIT % 0% 0% 44% 56% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 54% 46% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Painted Pony Ln/Old Ranch House Rd & Ranch View Dr/Salt Flt Ln 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
390
Day: Tuesday City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA25_070176_021
NB SB EB WB Total
0 0 1,344 1,260 2,604

TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL TIME NB SB EB WB TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL 0:00 12 3 12:00 22 20 42 00:00 01:00 47 11
0:15 21 3 12:15 17 9 26 01:00 02:00 20 2
0:30 13 4 12:30 20 9 29 02:00 03:00 00 0
0:45 01 1 12:45 13 17 30 03:00 04:00 13 4
1:00 00 0 13:00 17 17 34 04:00 05:00 42 6
1:15 00 0 13:15 10 20 30 05:00 06:00 51 1 16
1:30 20 2 13:30 15 25 40 06:00 07:00 16 29 45
1:45 00 0 13:45 23 20 43 07:00 08:00 170 111 281
2:00 00 0 14:00 44 14 58 08:00 09:00 118 138 256
2:15 00 0 14:15 37 13 50 09:00 10:00 44 59 103
2:30 00 0 14:30 32 28 60 10:00 11:00 46 58 104
2:45 00 0 14:45 21 60 81 11:00 12:00 58 51 109
3:00 00 0 15:00 42 23 65 12:00 13:00 72 55 127
3:15 00 0 15:15 23 29 52 13:00 14:00 65 82 147
3:30 10 1 15:30 28 32 60 14:00 15:00 134 115 249
3:45 03 3 15:45 41 22 63 15:00 16:00 134 106 240
4:00 00 0 16:00 33 24 57 16:00 17:00 103 84 187
4:15 31 4 16:15 23 14 37 17:00 18:00 85 81 166
4:30 01 1 16:30 19 25 44 18:00 19:00 82 77 159
4:45 10 1 16:45 28 21 49 19:00 20:00 70 76 146
5:00 00 0 17:00 24 18 42 20:00 21:00 63 55 118
5:15 24 6 17:15 14 19 33 21:00 22:00 42 32 74
5:30 04 4 17:30 24 19 43 22:00 23:00 17 16 33
5:45 3 3 6 17:45 23 25 48 23:00 00:00 9 12 21
6:00 16 7 18:00 25 22 47
6:15 46 10 18:15 11 23 34 NB SB EB WB TOTAL
6:30 47 11 18:30 22 17 39 00:00 to 12:00
6:45 71 0 17 18:45 24 15 39 468 469 937
7:00 51 1 16 19:00 24 33 57 7:30 7:30 7:30
7:15 20 8 28 19:15 15 25 40 211 184 395
7:30 114 32 146 19:30 91 1 20 0.463 0.767 0.676
7:45 31 60 91 19:45 22 7 29
8:00 19 53 72 20:00 15 15 30 12:00 to 00:00
8:15 47 39 86 20:15 26 14 40 876 791 1667
8:30 37 28 65 20:30 12 10 22 13:45 14:45 14:30
8:45 15 18 33 20:45 10 16 26 136 144 258
9:00 11 10 21 21:00 10 9 19 0.773 0.600 0.796
9:15 11 23 34 21:15 16 8 24
9:30 12 11 23 21:30 96 15 07:00 to 09:00
9:45 10 15 25 21:45 79 16 288 249 537
10:00 16 17 33 22:00 65 11 7:30 7:30 7:30
10:15 12 14 26 22:15 55 10 211 184 395
10:30 71 9 26 22:30 32 5 0.463 0.767 0.676
10:45 11 8 19 22:45 34 7
11:00 16 12 28 23:00 62 8 16:00 to 18:00
11:15 91 2 21 23:15 23 5 188 165 353
11:30 20 7 27 23:30 03 3 16:00 16:00 16:00
11:45 13 20 33 23:45 1 4 5 103 84 187
TOTALS 0 0 468 469 937 TOTALS 0 0 876 791 1667 0.780 0.840 0.820 SPLIT % 0% 0% 50% 50% 36% SPLIT % 0% 0% 53% 47% 64%
Volume
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Ranch View Dr/Salt Flt Ln & Whitney Oaks Dr 8/19/2025

DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS
15-Minutes Interval Hourly Intervals
TIME

STATISTICS
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Hour
Peak Volume
Peak Hour Factor
Peak Period
Volume
0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
00:00
01:00
02:00
03:00
04:00
05:00
06:00
07:00
08:00
09:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00

NB SB EB WB
391
392
B

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 2026
Appendix B
Radar Speed Survey Data

393
394
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 27 1
28 1
29 30 2
31 3
32 7
33 6
34 9
35 14
36 8
37 11
38 8
39 6
40 9
41 3
42 5
43 2
44 1
45 2
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 46 36 mph 40 mph 31 - 40 81 81% 5% / 5 14% / 14

SPEED PARAMETERS
Delmar Ave Bet Citrus Ave & Del Rio Ct
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:00-10:10
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-001
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 3
26 2
27 1
28 4
29 2
30 6
31 5
32 12
33 14
34 8
35 13
36 11
37 6
38 4
39 3
40 4
41 1
42 1
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 42 34 mph 37 mph 30 - 39 82 82% 12% / 12 6% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
Dominguez Rd Bet Pacific St & Granite Dr
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:20-11:10
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-002
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
395
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 1
30 4
31 8
32 6
33 2
34 8
35 5
36 9
37 8
38 7
39 7
40 3
41 8
42 7
43 5
44 2
45 2
46 3
47 48
49 50
51 1
52 1
53 1
54 1
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 28 - 54 37 mph 43 mph 34 - 43 67 67% 22% / 22 11% / 11

SPEED PARAMETERS
Lonetree Blvd Bet Blue Oaks Blvd & W Oaks Blvd
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:54-12:30
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-003
05 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 2
26 1
27 2
28 3
29 6
30 9
31 11
32 15
33 7
34 14
35 9
36 7
37 5
38 2
39 5
40 1
41 42 1
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 42 33 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 86 86% 5% / 5 9% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
Midas Ave Bet Argonaut Ave & Whitney Blvd
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:05-12:45
4/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-004
05 1 0 1 5 2 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
396
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20 1
21 3
22 1
23 6
24 4
25 7
26 7
27 3
28 7
29 6
30 4
31 7
32 1
33 5
34 35 2
36 37
38 1
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 65 20 - 38 28 mph 31 mph 22 - 31 52 80% 6% / 4 14% / 9

SPEED PARAMETERS
Old Ranch House Rd Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & Songbird Wy City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:15-11:15
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-005
05 1 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29 1
30 1
31 3
32 2
33 5
34 5
35 8
36 12
37 6
38 8
39 7
40 11
41 7
42 7
43 2
44 5
45 2
46 1
47 2
48 1
49 1
50 1
51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 27 - 51 38 mph 43 mph 33 - 42 76 76% 8% / 8 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
Pacific St Bet Sunset Blvd & Americana Way
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:15-11:55
7/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-006
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
397
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 2
25 1
26 4
27 4
28 7
29 13
30 5
31 11
32 9
33 2
34 5
35 1
36 3
37 38 1
39 1
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 69 24 - 39 30 mph 34 mph 25 - 34 61 88% 2% / 2 9% / 6

SPEED PARAMETERS
Painted Pony Ln Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & W Oaks Blvd
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:25-13:25
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-007
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 1
24 2
25 6
26 4
27 3
28 6
29 12
30 13
31 9
32 6
33 5
34 8
35 5
36 8
37 2
38 1
39 40 3
41 2
42 2
43 44
45 1
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 23 - 46 31 mph 36 mph 27 - 36 75 75% 13% / 13 12% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Rocklin Rd Bet 5th St & Pacific St
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:00-11:00
7/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-008
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
398
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24 3
25 4
26 12
27 11
28 9
29 7
30 14
31 11
32 10
33 5
34 4
35 4
36 3
37 1
38 2
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 24 - 38 30 mph 33 mph 25 - 34 87 87% 3% / 3 10% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
Rocklin Rd Bet Pacific St & Granite Dr
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:00-09:50
7/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-009
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 30 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 1
23 24
25 4
26 27 2
28 5
29 5
30 12
31 4
32 14
33 13
34 7
35 10
36 12
37 4
38 2
39 3
40 1
41 1
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 22 - 41 33 mph 36 mph 28 - 37 86 86% 7% / 7 7% / 7

SPEED PARAMETERS
Schriber Way Bet Sierra College Blvd & Lakepointe Dr
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:45-12:35
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-010
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
399
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 2
34 35 3
36 3
37 3
38 5
39 4
40 14
41 12
42 14
43 15
44 11
45 8
46 4
47 2
48 3
49 4
50 51 1
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 108 33 - 51 42 mph 45 mph 37 - 46 90 83% 7% / 8 10% / 10

SPEED PARAMETERS
CR E3/Sierra College Blvd Bet Granite Dr & Bass Pro Dr/Dominguez Rd City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
10:10-11:10
10/6/2025
Project #: 25-070221-003
05 1 0 1 5 2 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 50 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 1
42 1
43 44 4
45 3
46 2
47 6
48 6
49 4
50 4
51 8
52 7
53 9
54 7
55 10
56 6
57 5
58 6
59 4
60 2
61 3
62 2
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 41 - 62 53 mph 58 mph 47 - 56 67 67% 11% / 11 22% / 22

SPEED PARAMETERS
Sierra College Blvd/CR E3 Bet Scarborough Dr/King Ranch Pl & Rocklin Rd City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:35-14:05
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-012
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
400
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 1
26 1
27 2
28 6
29 1
30 3
31 8
32 3
33 5
34 4
35 3
36 7
37 7
38 10
39 4
40 6
41 4
42 8
43 3
44 5
45 1
46 1
47 2
48 2
49 2
50 51
52 53 1
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 53 37 mph 43 mph 33 - 42 58 58% 25% / 25 17% / 17

SPEED PARAMETERS
University Ave Bet Sunset Blvd & Whitney Ranch Pkwy
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-12:00
8/14/2025
Project #: 25-070177-001
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 3
26 27 1
28 29
30 4
31 2
32 6
33 2
34 6
35 4
36 9
37 5
38 12
39 11
40 10
41 9
42 3
43 5
44 3
45 3
46 2
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 25 - 46 38 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 74 74% 10% / 10 16% / 16

SPEED PARAMETERS
University Ave Bet Whitney Ranch Pkwy & W Ranch View Dr City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
09:45-10:30
10/6/2025
Project #: 25-070221-004
05 1 0 1 5
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
401
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 40 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29 1
30 4
31 3
32 2
33 4
34 4
35 7
36 8
37 17
38 13
39 12
40 11
41 5
42 2
43 44 4
45 1
46 47 1
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 27 - 47 37 mph 40 mph 32 - 41 83 83% 9% / 9 8% / 8

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Oaks Blvd Bet W Stanford Ranch Rd/Stanford Ranch Rd & Hunter Dr/Hunter Ct City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
11:00-11:30
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-015
05 1 0 1 5 2 0
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed -MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 4
27 3
28 9
29 6
30 7
31 7
32 9
33 10
34 10
35 2
36 8
37 3
38 4
39 7
40 6
41 3
42 6
43 44 3
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 26 - 44 33 mph 40 mph 27 - 36 71 66% 3% / 4 30% / 32

SPEED PARAMETERS
W Oaks Blvd Bet Painted Pony Ln & Hunter Dr/Hunter Ct
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
13:35-15:35
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-016
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
402
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Northbound & Southbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 30 2
31 1
32 5
33 8
34 15
35 22
36 17
37 10
38 7
39 4
40 5
41 5
42 2
43 1
44 45 1
46 47
48 49 1
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 107 28 - 49 35 mph 39 mph 32 - 41 98 92% 3% / 4 5% / 5

SPEED PARAMETERS
Whitney Blvd Bet Midas Ave & Sunset Blvd
City of Rocklin
Northbound & Southbound Spot Speeds
12:50-13:15
7/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-017
0 5 10 15 20 25
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26 3
27 3
28 1
29 5
30 9
31 7
32 1
33 3
34 5
35 6
36 8
37 4
38 12
39 8
40 5
41 5
42 1
43 1
44 3
45 4
46 2
47 2
48 1
49 1
50 1
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 101 26 - 50 36 mph 42 mph 30 - 39 63 62% 11% / 12 26% / 26

SPEED PARAMETERS
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet University Ave & Ocelot Wy
City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
12:05-13:15
1/20/2026
Project #: 26-070013-001
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
403
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 45 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 1
29 30 2
31 2
32 33 2
34 5
35 4
36 3
37 8
38 5
39 6
40 3
41 4
42 5
43 11
44 4
45 8
46 7
47 6
48 4
49 1
50 3
51 1
52 3
53 54 2
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 100 28 - 54 42 mph 47 mph 37 - 46 61 61% 19% / 19 20% / 20

SPEED PARAMETERS
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Painted Pony Ln/Old Ranch House Rd & Wildcat Blvd City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
10:16-10:50
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-019
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 4
26 8
27 6
28 11
29 8
30 10
31 11
32 12
33 6
34 7
35 5
36 1
37 1
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
>=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 90 25 - 37 30 mph 34 mph 26 - 35 84 93% 4% / 4 3% / 2

SPEED PARAMETERS
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Painted Pony Ln/Old Ranch House Rd & Ranch View Dr/Salt F City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
09:20-11:20
7/24/2025
Project #: 25-070159-020
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
404
Spot Speed Study
Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services
Eastbound & Westbound
DATE: Location:

TIME: Posted Speed: 35 MPH Weather: Clear/Dry
Speed
mph ALL Vehicles
<=10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 1
28 29 1
30 31
32 3
33 3
34 6
35 10
36 12
37 11
38 4
39 4
40 4
41 6
42 3
43 3
44 2
45 3
46 1
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 >=70
Class Count Range
50th
Percentile
85th
Percentile
10 MPH
Pace # in Pace
Percent in
Pace % / # Below Pace % / # Above Pace
ALL 77 27 - 46 37 mph 42 mph 32 - 41 63 82% 2% / 2 16% / 12

SPEED PARAMETERS
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Bet Whitney Oaks Dr & Ranch View Dr/Salt Flt Ln City of Rocklin
Eastbound & Westbound Spot Speeds
11:30-13:30
7/23/2025
Project #: 25-070159-021
0 5 10 15
70 68
66 64
62 60
58 56
54 52
50 48
46 44
42 40
38 36
34 32
30 28
26 24
22 20
18 16
14 12
10 Speed - MPH
Number of Vehicles
405
406
C

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 2026
Appendix C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension Worksheet

407
408
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 1 Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
3rd Street Sunset Boulevard Farron Street
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 7/5/2018 7/5/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
409
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 2 5/15/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 25 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
5th Street Midas Avenue 3rd Street
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 25 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/15/2018 410
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 3 6/25/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Argonaut Avenue Midas Avenue End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/25/2018 411
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 4 5/3/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Argonaut Avenue Whitney Boulevard Midas Avenue
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/3/2018 412
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 5 4/18/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Blue Oaks Boulevard Sunset Boulevard Roseville Border
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/18/2018 413
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 6 4/26/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Bridlewood Drive Wildcat Boulevard Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/26/2018 414
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 7 5/30/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
China Garden Road Aguilar Road End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/30/2018 415
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 8 4/24/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Clover Valley Road Midas Avenue Rawhide Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/24/2018 416
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 9 6/5/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Crest Drive Stanford Ranch Road Park Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/5/2018 417
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 10 4/23/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Fairway Drive Sunset Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/23/2018 418
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 11 4/25/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Farrier Road Park Drive Darby Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/25/2018 419
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 12 6/5/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Farron Street Pacific Street 3rd Street
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/5/2018 420
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 13 4/23/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Five Star Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/23/2018 421
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 14 6/19/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Granite Drive Rocklin Road Sierra Meadows Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/19/2018 422
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 15 6/20/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Granite Drive Sierra Meadows Drive Dominguez Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/20/2018 423
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 16 1/17/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Granite Drive Dominguez Road Sierra College Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 1/17/2018 424
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 17 6/7/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Lonetree Boulevard W Oaks Boulevard Sunset Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/7/2018 425
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 18 5/3/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Midas Avenue Pacific Street Argonaut Avenue
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/3/2018 426
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 19 5/3/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Midas Avenue Whitney Boulevard End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/3/2018 427
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 20 6/21/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Pacific Street Roseville Border Sunset Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/21/2018 428
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 21 6/26/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Pacific Street Americana Wy Loomis Border
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/26/2018 429
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 22 4/24/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Park Drive Roseville Border Sunset Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/24/2018 430
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 23 5/1/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Park Drive Sunset Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/1/2018 431
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 24 5/1/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Park Drive Stanford Ranch Road Crest Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/1/2018 432
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 25 5/17/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Park Drive Crest Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/17/2018 Whitney Ranch Pkwy/
Whitney Oaks Drive
433
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 26 7/3/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Ranch View Drive Wildcat Boulevard Spring Creek Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 7/3/2018 434
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 27 6/27/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Rawhide Road Midas Avenue End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/27/2018 435
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 28 6/21/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Rocklin Road Granite Drive El Don Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/21/2018 436
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 29 5/22/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Rocklin Road El Don Drive Loomis Border
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/22/2018 437
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 30 4/24/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Scarborough Drive Roseville Border
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/24/2018 Sierra College
Boulevard
438
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 31 6/13/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 55 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sierra College Boulevard Loomis Border Placer County
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 55 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/13/2018 439
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 32 6/13/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 50 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sierra College Boulevard Rocklin Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 50 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/13/2018 Bass Pro
Drive/Dominguez Road
440
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 33 4/30/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sierra Meadows Drive Pacific Street Granite Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/30/2018 441
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 34 4/20/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
South Whitney Boulevard Sunset Boulevard Five Star Boulevard Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/20/2018 442
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 35 4/26/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Spring Creek Drive Whitney Ranch Pkwy Ranch View Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/26/2018 443
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 36 6/5/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Springview Drive Sunset Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/5/2018 Springview Meadows
Drive
444
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 37 6/5/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Springview Drive S Whitney Boulevard Springview Meadows Drive Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/5/2018 445
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 38 5/15/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Stanford Ranch Road Roseville Border Park Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/15/2018 446
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 39 5/2/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Stanford Ranch Road Park Drive W Oaks Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/2/2018 447
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 40 6/25/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Hwy 65 Blue Oaks Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 6/25/2018 448
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 41 4/18/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Blue Oaks Boulevard Park Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/18/2018 449
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 42 4/17/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Park Drive Stanford Ranch Road
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/17/2018 450
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 43 5/23/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road Whitney Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/23/2018 451
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 44 4/11/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 40 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Whitney Boulevard Pacific Street
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 40 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/11/2018 452
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 45 4/11/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Sunset Boulevard Pacific Street Woodside Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/11/2018 453
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 46 5/1/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
W Oaks Boulevard Lonetree Boulevard Sunset Boulevard
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/1/2018 454
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 47 5/1/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
W Oaks Boulevard Sunset Boulevard W Stanford Ranch Road Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/1/2018 455
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 48 8/14/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
W Ranch View Drive Wildcat Boulevard End
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 8/14/2018 456
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 49 4/26/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
W Stanford Ranch Road Sunset Boulevard W Oaks Boulevard Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/26/2018 457
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 50 5/2/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Whitney Boulevard Crest Drive Midas Avenue
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 5/2/2018 458
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 51 4/30/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Whitney Oaks Drive Whitney Ranch Pkwy Park Drive
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/30/2018 459
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 52 4/26/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 45 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Wildcat Boulevard W Stanford Ranch Road Lincoln Border
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 45 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/26/2018 460
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 53 4/20/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 30 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Woodside Drive Pacific Street Lost Avenue
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 30 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/20/2018 461
Street: From: To:

Part A
Have there been any changes in the street system that could result in a significant change in traffic volumes? No Has there been a significant change in land uses adjacent to the street? No Have there been changes to the street segment such as lane geometrics or changes to traffic controls? No If there are no significant changes to all of the above then Part A is met Yes Part B
Does the agency maintain a policy requiring officers using radar or other electronic speed recording devices to have the required hours of training per CVC 40802? Yes If Parts A & B are satisfied then the existing Engineering and Traffic Survey is extended to 54 4/30/2032
Conclusions and Recommendations
On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, as reported above, and in accordance with the provisions of Sections 627, 22357, 22358 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code, a speed limit of 35 MPH is hereby extended for the street segment identified above.

Kevin Carstens, PE
September 19, 2025
Date City/Town Engineer
Observations
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey Extension
Wyckford Boulevard Park Drive Stratton Court
Base Conditions
Posted Limit: 35 MPH
Date of Initial Engineering and Traffic Survey 4/30/2018 462
D

Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the City of Rocklin February 2026
Appendix D
Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms

463
464
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 50 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.43 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 40 mph Collisions: 0 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 36 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 31-40 mph
Collision Rate: 0.00 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 81.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Delmar Avenue Pacific Street Loomis Border
Street Conditions
Flat
Portion Divided
Discontinuous
None
Both Sides
Office
Observations and Evaluation
Minor Collector
Urban
Business Activity District:
35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
Truck traffic is expected since the roadway connects to commercial and industrial uses.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Delmar Avenue has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 40 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. (Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
3,200
465
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:
7/23/2025 9:00 Clear/Dry
SouthboundNorthbound
Wednesday 10:10
Delmar Avenue Pacific Street Loomis Border
NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
466
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 46 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.47 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 37 mph Collisions: 2 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 34 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 30-39 mph
Collision Rate: 1.02 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 82.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Dominguez Road Pacific Street Granite Drive
Street Conditions
Undivided
Some Restrictions
None
Both Sides
Commercial
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Major Collector
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
3,800
Truck traffic is expected since the roadway connects to commercial and industrial uses.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Dominguez Road has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 37 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
467
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Dominguez Road Pacific Street Granite Drive
Eastbound Westbound
7/23/2025 10:20 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 11:10 NDS
0 2
4 6
8 10
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
468
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 40 mph
Width: 76 feet
Lanes: 4
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 1 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 43 mph
Collisions: 13 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 37 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 34-43 mph
Collision Rate: 0.73 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 67.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.64 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Lonetree Boulevard Blue Oaks Boulevard W Oaks Boulevard Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Commercial
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
16,300
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses include sports fields and commercial uses that are associated with pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Lonetree Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 43 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 45 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 40 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
469
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Lonetree Boulevard Blue Oaks Boulevard W Oaks Boulevard Northbound Southbound
7/23/2025 11:54 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 12:30 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
470
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 30 mph
Width: 40 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 1.18 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 36 mph Collisions: 9 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 33 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 28-37 mph
Collision Rate: 1.85 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 86.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Midas Avenue Argonaut Avenue Whitney Boulevard
Street Conditions
Undivided
Both Sides
None
Both Sides
Residential
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Major Collector
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
3,800
Surrounding land uses are residential, with frequent driveways and associated pedestrian activity. Parks are located along the segment, which also generate pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Midas Avenue has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 36 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph.

On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 30 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 30 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
471
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Midas Avenue Argonaut Avenue Whitney Boulevard
Eastbound Westbound
7/24/2025 12:05 Clear/Dry
Thursday 12:45 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
472
Street: Old Ranch House Road From: To:

Posted Limit: 30 mph
Width: 40 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility: Bike lane both sides
Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 65
Segment Length: 0.32 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 31 mph Collisions: 0 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 28 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 22-31 mph
Collision Rate: 0.00 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 80.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Creek Hollow RdWhitney Ranch Pkwy
Street Conditions
Undivided
None
Both Sides
Residential
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Local
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
1,200
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. A park with a playground is located along the segment, which generates pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Old Ranch House Road has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 31 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 30 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 30 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 30 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 25, 2025
Date
473
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Old Ranch House Road Whitney Ranch Pkwy Creek Hollow Rd Northbound Southbound
7/23/2025 9:15 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 11:15 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
474
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 40 mph
Width: 78 feet
Lanes: 5
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 1.68 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 43 mph Collisions: 13 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 38 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 33-42 mph
Collision Rate: 0.50 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 76.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.75 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Pacific Street Sunset Boulevard Americana Wy
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
None
Discontinuous
Both Sides
Commercial
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
14,100
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses include commercial uses and the Quarry Park, which are associated with pedestrian activity. There are frequent uncontrolled crosswalks and pedestrian- oriented, downtown businesses between Rocklin Road and Midas Avenue.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Pacific Street has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 43 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 45 mph.

On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 40 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
475
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Pacific Street Sunset Boulevard Americana Wy
Northbound Southbound
7/24/2025 11:15 Clear/Dry
Thursday 11:55 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
476
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 40 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 69
Segment Length: 0.37 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 34 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 30 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 25-34 mph
Collision Rate: 1.48 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 88.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Painted Pony Ln Whitney Ranch Pkwy West Oaks Boulevard
Street Conditions
Undivided
None
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Local
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
1,700
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Painted Pony Ln has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 34 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
477
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Painted Pony Ln Whitney Ranch Pkwy West Oaks Boulevard
Eastbound Westbound
7/23/2025 11:25 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 13:25 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
478
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 30 mph
Width: 44 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility: Bike lane both sides
Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.33 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 36 mph Collisions: 0 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 31 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 27-36 mph
Collision Rate: 0.00 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 75.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Rocklin Road 5th Street Pacific Street
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
Both Sides
Both Sides
Residential
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Major Collector
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
2,800
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses are residential, with frequent driveways and associated pedestrian activity. The Peter Hill Heritage Park, spanning both sides of the street, and the Rocklin Amtrak Station further generates pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Rocklin Road has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 36 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph.

On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 30 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 30 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
479
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Rocklin Road 5th Street Pacific Street
Eastbound Westbound
7/24/2025 10:00 Clear/Dry
Thursday 11:00 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
480
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 78 feet
Lanes: 5
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.57 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 33 mph Collisions: 15 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 30 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 25-34 mph
Collision Rate: 1.23 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 87.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.75 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Rocklin Road Pacific Street Granite Drive
Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Public
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
19,600
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses include commercial and public uses like City Hall, Memorial Park, and the Finnish Temperance Hall, which generate pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Rocklin Road has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 33 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph.

On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
481
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Rocklin Road Pacific Street Granite Drive
Eastbound Westbound
7/24/2025 9:00 Clear/Dry
Thursday 9:50 NDS
0 2
4 6
8 10
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
482
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 30 mph
Width: 47 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.35 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 36 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 33 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 28-37 mph
Collision Rate: 0.66 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 86.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Schriber Wy Sierra College Boulevard Lakepointe Drive
Street Conditions
Undivided
None
Discontinuous
Both Sides
Commercial
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Local
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
4,000
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Schriber Wy has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 36 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph.

On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 30 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 30 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
483
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Schriber Wy Sierra College Boulevard Lakepointe Drive
Eastbound Westbound
7/23/2025 11:45 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 12:35 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
484
Street: From: Granite Drive To:

Posted Limit: 40 mph
Width: 106 feet
Lanes: 5
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 108
Segment Length: 0.58 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 45 mph Collisions: 10 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 42 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 37-46 mph
Collision Rate: 0.44 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 83.0% Statewide Average Rate*:

1.00 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Sierra College Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 45 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 45 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 40 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
October 31, 2025
Date
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Other Principal Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
35,800
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
None
Discontinuous
Commercial
Bike lane both sides
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Sierra College Boulevard Bass Pro Drive/Dominguez Road
485
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:
10/6/2025 10:10 Clear/Dry
Monday 11:10 NDS
Sierra College Boulevard Granite Drive Bass Pro Drive/Dominguez Road Northbound Southbound
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
486
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 50 mph
Width: 96 feet
Lanes: 4
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 1.8 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 58 mph Collisions: 10 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 53 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 47-56 mph
Collision Rate: 0.22 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 67.0% Statewide Average Rate*:

0.77 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways Land and facilities that generate a high concentration of pedestrians or bicyclists are within a quarter mile of the entire length of the segment (see Table 2B-106(CA) of the CA-MUTCD) including Sierra Elementary School, Sierra College, Granite Bay Hilltop Church, the Sunrise of Rocklin assisted living facility, and facilities like bike lanes, sidewalks, and crosswalks.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Sierra College Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 58 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 60 mph.

Upon completing the engineering and traffic survey, the potential speed limit of 55 mph is still more than reasonable or safe.

As the portion of highway is adjacent to land and facilities that generate a high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists, especially from vulnerable groups, an additional 5 mph was reduced per California Vehicle Code Section 22358.7. It is recommended that the posted speed limit of 50 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 50 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
October 31, 2025
Date
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Other Principal Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
22,800
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
Discontinuous
One Side
Residential
Bike lane both sides
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Sierra College Boulevard Rocklin Road Roseville Border
487
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:
7/23/2025 13:35 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 14:05 NDS
Sierra College Boulevard Rocklin Road Roseville Border
Northbound Southbound
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
488
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 40 mph
Width: 76 feet
Lanes: 4
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 1.09 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 43 mph Collisions: 5 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 37 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 33-42 mph
Collision Rate: 1.24 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 58.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.64 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
University Avenue Sunset Boulevard Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
None
Discontinuous
One Side
Mixed
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Local
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
3,400
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. William Jessup University is located along the segment, which may generate pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
University Avenue has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 43 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 45 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 40 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
489
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

University Avenue Sunset Boulevard Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Northbound Southbound
8/14/2025 11:00 Clear/Dry
Thursday 12:00 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
490
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 30 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.45 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 42 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 38 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 32-41 mph
Collision Rate: 0.36 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 74.0% Statewide Average Rate*:

1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses are residential, with associated pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
University Avenue has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 42 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
October 31, 2025
Date
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Local
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
5,700
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
None
One Side
Residential
Bike lane one side
City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
University Avenue Whitney Ranch Pkwy W Ranch View Drive 491
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:
10/6/2025 9:45 Clear/Dry
Monday 10:30 NDS
University Avenue Whitney Ranch Pkwy W Ranch View Drive Northbound Southbound
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
492
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 40 mph
Width: 80 feet
Lanes: 4
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.31 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 40 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 37 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 32-41 mph
Collision Rate: 0.30 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 83.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.64 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
W Oaks Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road Hunter Drive
Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
9,900
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
W Oaks Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 40 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 40 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
493
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

W Oaks Boulevard Stanford Ranch Road Hunter Drive
Northbound Southbound
7/23/2025 11:00 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 11:30 NDS
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
494
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 54 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 107
Segment Length: 0.56 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 40 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 33 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 27-36 mph
Collision Rate: 0.19 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 66.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
W Oaks Boulevard Hunter Drive Painted Pony Ln
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
None
One Side
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
8,500
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
W Oaks Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 40 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
495
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

W Oaks Boulevard Hunter Drive Painted Pony Ln
Northbound Southbound
7/23/2025 13:35 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 15:35 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
496
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 86 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 107
Segment Length: 1 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 39 mph
Collisions: 2 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 35 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 32-41 mph
Collision Rate: 0.29 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 92.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Whitney Boulevard Midas Avenue Sunset Boulevard
Street Conditions
Divided
Both Sides
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Major Collector
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
6,300
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes. Surrounding land uses are residential, with frequent driveways and associated pedestrian activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Whitney Boulevard has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 39 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
497
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Whitney Boulevard Midas Avenue Sunset Boulevard
Northbound Southbound
7/24/2025 12:50 Clear/Dry
Thursday 13:15 NDS
0 2
4 6
8 10
12 14
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Southbound Northbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
498
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 45 mph
Width: 120 feet
Lanes: 6
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 101
Segment Length: 0.57 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 42 mph Collisions: 0 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 36 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 30-39 mph
Collision Rate: 0.00 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 62.0% Statewide Average Rate*:

0.87 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Hwy 65 Wildcat Boulevard
Street Conditions
Portion Divided
Discontinuous
Discontinuous
Both Sides
Residential
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
10,200
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Whitney Ranch Pkwy has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 42 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that a speed limit of 40 mph be adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 40 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
February 3, 2026
Date
499
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Whitney Ranch Pkwy Hwy 65 Wildcat Boulevard
Eastbound Westbound
1/20/2026 12:05 Clear/Dry
Tuesday 13:15 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
500
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 45 mph
Width: 66 feet
Lanes: 4
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 100
Segment Length: 0.9 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 47 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 42 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 37-46 mph
Collision Rate: 0.14 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 61.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 0.93 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Wildcat Boulevard Painted Pony Ln
Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane one side
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
7,200
Whitney High School, Whitney Community Park, Whitney Park Bike Pump Track, and The Ranch House are located along or near the segment, which are associated with pedestrian and bicycle activity.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Whitney Ranch Pkwy has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 47 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 45 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 45 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 45 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
501
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Whitney Ranch Pkwy Wildcat Boulevard Painted Pony Ln
Eastbound Westbound
7/23/2025 10:16 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 10:50 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
502
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 54 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 90
Segment Length: 0.78 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 34 mph Collisions: 2 crashes Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 30 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 26-35 mph
Collision Rate: 0.47 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 93.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Painted Pony Ln Ranch View Drive
Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Flat
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
4,900
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Whitney Ranch Pkwy has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 34 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 35 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
503
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Whitney Ranch Pkwy Painted Pony Ln Ranch View Drive
Eastbound Westbound
7/24/2025 9:20 Clear/Dry
Thursday 11:20 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
504
Street: From: To:

Posted Limit: 35 mph
Width: 54 feet
Lanes: 2
Configuration:

Parking:

Bike Facility:

Sidewalks:

Land Use:

Classification:

Character:

Terrain:

No
Volume (ADT): vpd Vehicles Sampled: 77
Segment Length: 0.73 miles 85th Percentile Speed: 42 mph Collisions: 1 crash Mean (50th Percentile) Speed: 37 mph Evaluation Period: 3 years Pace: 32-41 mph
Collision Rate: 0.48 c/mvm (collisions per million vehicle miles) Percent in Pace: 82.0% Statewide Average Rate*: 1.07 c/mvm
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to the Driver:
* Source: Department of California, 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways City of Rocklin
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Whitney Ranch Pkwy Ranch View Drive Whitney Oaks Drive
Street Conditions
Divided
None
Both Sides
Residential
Bike lane both sides
(Additional details provided on the next sheet.)
Minor Arterial
Urban
Hilly
Business Activity District:

Observations and Evaluation
2,600
Drivers may be in conflict with bicyclists in Class II bike lanes.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Whitney Ranch Pkwy has a calculated 85th percentile speed of 42 mph, with the nearest 5-mph increment of 40 mph. On the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and considering the conditions not readily apparent to the driver, it is recommended that the posted speed limit of 35 mph be retained in accordance with the provisions of Section 627, 22348 through 22413 and 40802 of the California Vehicle Code. 35 mph
Recommended Kevin Carstens, P.E.

Speed Limit
September 18, 2025
Date
505
Street: From: To:

Date Data Collected: Start Time: Weather:

Day of the Week: End Time: Recorder:

Whitney Ranch Pkwy Ranch View Drive Whitney Oaks Drive
Eastbound Westbound
7/23/2025 11:30 Clear/Dry
Wednesday 13:30 NDS
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Number Recorded
Speed
Speed Profile
Westbound Eastbound

0.0 10.0

20.0 30.0

40.0 50.0

60.0 70.0

80.0 90.0
100.0
Percent
Speed
Cumulative Speed Profile
506
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Establishment of a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit
Date:

February 24, 2026
Submitted By:

Ryan Brayton, Deputy Fire Chief
Reginald Williams, Fire Chief
Department:

Fire
Recommendation:

Introduce, Waive the Full Reading and Read By Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Establishing a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit Within the Rocklin Fire Department and Authorizing Designated Personnel to Exercise Peace Officer Powers Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 830.37.

Background:

The City of Rocklin Fire Department conducts fire prevention, fire code enforcement, and fire and arson investigations within the city, including investigations of suspected arson and related criminal activity. These investigative functions have historically been performed in coordination with the Rocklin Police Department and in accordance with applicable state law.

California Penal Code Section 830.37 expressly recognizes members of an arson- investigating unit regularly employed by a City fire department as peace officers when their primary duty is the detection and apprehension of persons who have violated fire laws or committed insurance fraud. Under Penal Code Section 830.37, peace officer authority is limited to the performance of assigned duties, extends statewide for those purposes, and does not confer general law enforcement authority.

The Rocklin Fire Department took steps to professionalize and formalize its fire and arson investigation function by ensuring designated personnel complete Department of Justice background investigations and the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) prescribed training under Penal Code Section 832.

In January 2023, the City formally established a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit within the Rocklin Fire Department for administrative and operational purposes. Since that time, fire and arson investigations have continued to be conducted in coordination with the Rocklin Police Department and allied law enforcement partners, including information sharing and investigative support consistent with state and federal requirements.

Item Number D2.

507
While Penal Code section 830.37 provides limited peace officer authority, access to criminal justice information systems such as the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) is governed by separate administrative requirements established by the California Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Services Division. In order for a fire department arson investigation unit to qualify for direct access to these systems, the unit must be formally established by City Council action and assigned an Originating Agency Identifier (ORI) through the Department of Justice.

The Rocklin Municipal Code does not currently contain express language establishing a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit or designating the unit as a criminal justice/law enforcement sub- unit for these administrative purposes. Adoption of the proposed ordinance is therefore recommended to provide the required formal authorization. The ordinance provides the documentation necessary to support issuance of an ORI by the Department of Justice and to enable compliant access to criminal justice information systems.

The ordinance does not expand the authority, duties, or operational scope of the Fire Department.

Adoption of the ordinance provides the formal City Council authorization required to support the establishment of an ORI, a requirement to enable direct CLETS access in compliance with state and federal requirements and provides administrative clarity while continuing the Fire Department’s fire and arson investigation mission.

Environmental Analysis:

The proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060 and 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, providing that organizational or administrative activities of the City are not projects for purposes of CEQA as this organizational change will not result in a direct physical change nor cause an indirect physical change to the environment.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund from the staff recommendation.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance
508