Agenda packet — Rocklin City Council, April 14, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

ROCKLIN CITY COUNCIL
City Council Regular Meeting
City Hall - Council Chambers
3970 Rocklin Rd. Rocklin, CA
95677
Website:
www.rocklin.ca.us
April 14, 2026
Closed Session 5:30 p.m.

General Session 6:00 p.m.

AMENDED AGENDA
*Consent Calendar Item C7 added

DAVID BASS,

Mayor

BILL HALLDIN,

Vice Mayor

KEN BROADWAY,

Council Member

JILL GAYALDO,

Council Member

GREG JANDA,

Council Member

ALY ZIMMERMANN,

City Manager

MATTHEW MCOMBER,

City Attorney

DANIEL CHOE,

City Treasurer

AVINTA SINGH,

City Clerk

HOW TO PARTICIPATE
The City of Rocklin welcomes your interest and involvement in the City's legislative process. The City Council has established a procedure for addressing the Council. Persons wishing to address the City Council are asked to voluntarily complete and submit a speaker identification sheet to the City Clerk.

Speaker identification sheets are available near the entrance of the Council Chambers. For items listed on the agenda, any person may address the City Council at the time the item is considered. Speakers are requested to restrict their comments to the item as it appears on the agenda and stay within the required three-minute time limit. The Brown Act does not permit the City Council to take action on items brought up under Citizens Addressing the City Council.

WRITINGS RECEIVED AFTER AGENDA POSTING
Any writing or documents related to an agenda item for this meeting provided to the City Council, Public Financing Authority or Successor Agency will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, during normal business hours.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, including receiving notices, agendas, and other writings in appropriate alternative formats, please contact our office at (916) 625- 5560 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed so that we may make every reasonable effort to accommodate you.

LEVINE ACT PROVISIONS

The Levine Act requires a party (or the party’s agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Rocklin that
involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to
disclose any campaign contribution made to a City elected or appointed officer (including Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, and members of other City boards and commissions) totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision.

City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
1 CS1.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Manager
CS2.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: Conference with Labor Negotiators, Agency Designated Representatives: Mayor Bass, Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
CS3.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Attorney
CS4.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6: Conference with Labor Negotiators, Agency Designated Representatives: Mayor Bass, Unrepresented Employee: City Attorney

AUDIO/VISUAL PRESENTATIONS
If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, all audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance. The City is not responsible for the compatibility or operation of non-city devices or the functionality of non-city presentations.

POSTING OF AGENDA
In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) this agenda was posted on the City's bulletin board at City Hall, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, and City of Rocklin website at www.rocklin.ca.us.

AGENDA

MEETING

INSTRUCTIONS
The public may listen to audio or view the meeting via live stream at https://www.rocklin.ca.us/agendas-minutes
.

For those that do not plan on attending in person, but wish to make a public comment during the meeting, public comments will be accepted in email form until 3:00 p.m. on the meeting day. Public comments should be submitted to the City Clerk at [email protected]
. Emailed public comments will be distributed to City Council and treated as a public record.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION

CLOSED SESSION

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
2 C1.

Minutes of the March 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council C2.

Proclamation Recognizing April as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month C3.

Amendments to the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to the Budget Process (Second Reading of Ordinance)
C4.

Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment
(Second Reading of
Ordinance)

CALL GENERAL SESSION TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

AGENDA REVIEW

CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
This is an opportunity for public comment on matters not listed on the agenda. Public comment on items listed on the agenda will be taken when the agenda item is called.

REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
Reports from the City Council will include any AB1234 Reports.

CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered and acted upon by one Motion. Anyone may request an item be removed for separate consideration.

Recommendation:

Approve the Minutes of the March 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council.

Recommendation:

Approve a Proclamation Recognizing April as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month, and designate the Mayor to Sign the Proclamation on Behalf of the City Council.

Recommendation:

Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending Sections 2.28.020, and Chapter 3.28 of the Rocklin Municipal Code Relating to the Preparation, Submission and City Council’s Adoption of the Budget.

Recommendation:

Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin amending the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use and to allow deviations from off- street parking standards, both subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit within commercial zoning districts (Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / PDG2026-0001).

City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
3 C5.

Amendments to Various Agreements for Legal Services
C6.

Vacant Property Weed Abatement
C7.

City of Rocklin and Placer County Public Services Cooperation Agreement P1.

Recognition of 2026 Leadership Award Recipient and 2026 Employee of the Year P2.

Proclamation Recognizing April 2026 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month, and Arts Commission Annual Report
P3.

Rocklin Arts Commission Annual Presentation

Recommendation:

A
.

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving and Authorizing the City Attorney to Execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore.

B
.

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving and Authorizing the City Attorney to Execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Special Counsel Legal Services with Civica Law Group, APC.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Declaring Conditions at Locations within the City of Rocklin to be a Public Nuisance, Ordering Weed Abatement of Same, and Setting the Date and Time for a Protest Hearing.

Recommendation:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Public Services Cooperation Agreement between the County of Placer and the City of Rocklin Related to the Use of County-owned Properties within the City of Rocklin.

PRESENTATIONS
In addition to those items listed on the agenda, the Mayor may add additional ceremonial matters.

Recommendation:

Receive a Presentation from the Rocklin Arts Commission.

City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
4 PH1.

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing and Approval of the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Benefit of Rocklin WJU 719, L.P.

PH2.

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing and Approval of the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Benefit of Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P.

PH3.

Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001
D1.

AB 481 – Military Equipment Report and Inventory: Annual Update

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings may be reordered by the Mayor with the consent of the legislative body.

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Plan of Finance including the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Outstanding Principal Amount Not to Exceed $115,000,000 to Finance and Refinance a Qualified Residential Rental Project for the Benefit of Rocklin WJU 719, L.P. (or an Affiliate), and Certain Other Matters Relating Thereto.

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Plan of Finance including the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Outstanding Principal Amount Not to Exceed $35,000,000 to Finance and Refinance a Qualified Residential Rental Project for the Benefit of Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P. (or an Affiliate), and Certain Other Matters Relating Thereto.

Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Introduce, Waive the Full Reading and Read by Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Development Agreement by and between the City of Rocklin and Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. and Real Property Investment Pros, Inc., relative to the Granite Lake Estates Subdivision (Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / DA2024-0001).

DISCUSSION ITEMS
Discussion Items include oral presentations including those recommending "receive and file".

Recommendation:

Introduce, Waive the Full Reading, and Read by Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving and Adopting A Military Equipment Use Policy for Fiscal Year 2026/27.

City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
5 D2.

Amendments to Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 5.22 to Implement the Short- Term Rental Facilitator Act of 2025

Recommendation:

Introduce, Waive the Full Reading and Read by Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending Chapter 5.22 of the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to Short-Term Rentals to Establish Reporting, Listing, and Audit Requirements Applicable to Short-Term Rental Facilitators.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
City Council Regular Meeting Agenda of April 14, 2026
6 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Minutes of the March 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
Department:

City Clerk's Office
Recommendation:

Approve the Minutes of the March 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council.

Item Number C1.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft City Council Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 7 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 1 | P a g e

ROCKLIN CITY COUNCIL

City Council Regular Meeting
City Hall – Council Chambers
3970 Rocklin Rd. Rocklin, CA 95677
Website: www.rocklin.ca.us

March 24, 2026
Closed Session 5:00 p.m.

General Session 6:00 p.m.

MEETING MINUTES
-DRAFT-

CALL TO ORDER

Mayor Bass called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Present: Councilmembers Jill Gayaldo, Bill Halldin, Greg Janda Mayor David Bass

Absent: Council Member Ken Broadway

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION

There were none.

Members of the City Council left the Council Chambers and convened Closed Session at 5:01 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION

CS1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation: Cameron Corona v City of Rocklin, et al., United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No.: 2:24-CV01178-CKD

CS2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Manager

CS3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, Public Employee Performance Evaluation: City Attorney

Members of the City Council returned to the Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. 8 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 2 | P a g e

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION

There was no reportable action.

CALL GENERAL SESSION TO ORDER

Mayor Bass called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Bass led the pledge of allegiance.

AGENDA REVIEW

There were no changes to the agenda.

CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL

There were none.

REPORTS FROM CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER

Council Member Gayaldo shared that she attended an event for Founding Forward noting that local high school students were recognized and would participate in the Valley Forge program; attended a flag retiring ceremony organized by the Cub Scouts; reported attendance at the Sacramento Area Coun cil of Governments (SACOG) Board meeting; attended the Placer City and County Officials Association (PCCOA) dinner hosted by the City of Roseville; attended the opening ceremonies for Tri City Little League and Rocklin Girls Fast Pitch Softball League; attended the annual employee award ceremony for the City of Rocklin; attended an event in Long Beach on behalf of SACOG to receive the 2026 Eureka! Award for Regional Excellence given by the California Association of Councils of Governments; shared that she, Mayor Bass and City Manager Zimmermann met with County officials for a 3x3 meeting; attended the Town Hall meeting held at the Rocklin Events Center; shared that the SACOG Board toured Sutter Health Park in West Sacramento; shared that she, Vice Mayor Hall din, and Council Member Broadway attended the swearing-in ceremony for three new firefighters; attended a farewell event for retiring Rocklin Area Chamber of Commerce CEO Robin Trimble; attended a funeral memorial for Paul Greco who was an educator and coa ch at Roseville High School and Sierra College; reminded all of the upcoming Run Rocklin event on April 12, 2026 and urged the public to attend; and shared that the Rocklin Firefighters Association was holding its annual Easter egg hunt on April 5, 2026.

Vice Mayor Halldin reported attendance at the Western Placer Waste Management Authority (WPWMA) Board meeting; attended the opening ceremony for the Rocklin Pony Youth Baseball League; attended the 6 th Annual Whitney High School Baseball Dinner and Fundraiser; and attended the Town Hall meeting held at Sierra College. 9 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 3 | P a g e
Mayor Bass shared he attended the employee award ceremony event; attended opening ceremony events for youth sports and the Placer SPCA’s Guardian Angel Gala event all held the same evening; reported attendance at the Greater Sacramento Economic Council (GSEC) Board meeting; and participated in the 3x3 meeting with City and County officials.

City Manager Zimmermann shared that two Town Hall meetings had been held so far and expressed her thanks to Vice Mayor Halldin and Council Member Gayaldo for attending; noted that the Town Hall meeting on March 25, 2026 would be conducted virtually through Zoom; the Town Hall meeting scheduled for March 31, 2026 would be held at City Hall in the Council Chambers; shared the Rocklin Annual Clean Up Day was scheduled for April 11, 2026; and that the Run Rocklin event would be held on April 12, 2026.

CONSENT CALENDAR

Council Member Gayaldo requested to pull Consent Item No. C15 from the Consent Calendar for additional information from staff.

C1. Minutes of the February 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council Action: Approved the Minutes of the February 24, 2026, Regular Meeting of the City Council.

C2. Engineering and Traffic Survey (Second Reading of Ordinance) Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 1199 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending the Chapter 10.11 of Title 10 of the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to Speed Limits within the City of Rocklin.

C3. Establishment of a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit (Second Reading of Ordinance)
Action: Adopted Ordinance No. 1200 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Establishing a Fire and Arson Investigation Unit Within the Rocklin Fire Department and Authorizing Designated Personnel to Exercise Peace Officer Powers Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 830.37.

C4. Community Recognition Commission Recommendations for 2026 Ruhkala Awards Action: Approved the Community Recognition Commission's recommendations for the 2026 Ruhkala Awards.

C5. Agreement with Growth Factory for Continuation of Build Up Rocklin Program - Amendment No. 1
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-023 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Authorizing Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Growth Factory for the Build Up Rocklin Program.

10 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 4 | P a g e
C6. Ordering the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer's Reports Action:

A. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-024 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer's Report for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for the Fiscal Year 2026/27.

B. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-025 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Ordering the Preparation of the Engineer's Report for Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for the Fiscal Year 2026/27.

C7. Cooperative Purchase Agreements for Fiscal Year 2025/26 - Repeal and Replace Resolution No. 2026-004
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-026 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Repealing Resolution No. 2026-004 and Authorizing the City Manager to Purchase Goods and Services through Cooperative Purchase Agreements for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

C8. Accounts Paid List - October to December 2025
Action: Received the Accounts Paid List for October 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.

C9. Fiscal Year 2025/26 Second Quarter Reports: Financial, Building, Capital Improvement Program, and Strategic Plan Update
Action:

A. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-027 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Accepting the Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2025, Amending the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budget.

B. Received the Quarterly Building Report and the Capital Improvement Program Progress Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2025.

C. Received an Update on the 2025-2027 Strategic Plan.

C10. CAD-to-CAD Software and Services Agreement
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-028 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving the Software and Services Agreement with Sun Ridge Systems, Inc. and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement and Subsequent Amendments.

C11. Sunset Whitney Recreation Area Pickleball Courts
Action:

A. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-029 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts and a Mitigation Monitoring Program (ENV2025-001).

B. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-030 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Awarding a Construction Contract for the Sunset Whitney Recreation Area Pickleball Courts Project to Central Valley Engineering & Asphalt, Inc., Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Contract, and Authorizing a Budget Appropriation.
11 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 5 | P a g e

C12. Boulder Ridge Neighborhood Park Cell Tower Lease Amendment Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-031 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Communications Site License Agreement (MetroPCS/Boulder Ridge Neighborhood Park).

C13. Night Ridge Park Playground Replacement Contract Award Action:

A. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-032 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Authorizing the City Manager to Purchase the Night Ridge Park Replacement Play Structures from Miracle PlaySystems, Inc. through Sourcewell Cooperative Purchase Agreement No. 101625-PLP.

B. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-033 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Awarding the Contract for Night Ridge Park Play Structure Replacement to KYA Services, LLC and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with KYA Services, LLC.

C14. Irrigation and Landscaping Goods and Supplies
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-034 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Authorizing the City Manager to Purchase Goods and Supplies from Heritage Landscape Supply Group, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

C15. Open Space Monitoring Services Contract Award
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 2026-035 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Awarding the Contract for Open Space Monitoring Services to Vollmar Natural Lands Consulting, Inc., and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement.

City Manager Zimmermann addressed questions regarding the open space monitoring services contract.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

Motion to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. C1 through C15, by Vice Mayor Halldin seconded by Council Member Janda. Consent Item Nos. C1 through C10, C11.A, and C12 through C15 passed by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
Mayor Bass
Noes: None

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None

Mayor Bass registered a no vote for Consent Item No. C11.B:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
12 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 6 | P a g e

Noes: Mayor Bass

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None

PRESENTATIONS

P1. Rocklin Fire Department 2025 Annual Report
Action: Received a Presentation on the Rocklin Fire Department 2025 Annual Report.

Fire Chief Reginald Williams presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Benjamin Bjorkman addressed the City Council and asked a question related to the fire budget, which was responded to by Fire Chief Williams.

The City Council expressed their appreciation to the Rocklin Fire Department, emphasizing that emergencies are responded to with paramedics with the ability to perform lifesaving measures, looked forward to the addition of a new fire station and personnel in south east Rocklin that will help the City maintain response times, appreciated the regional partnerships, commitment to fast response times, and level of professionalism by the fire department.

P2. Rocklin Police Department 2025 Annual Report
Action: Received a Presentation on the Rocklin Police Department 2025 Annual Report.

Police Chief Rustin Banks introduced Crime Analyst Shawn Baird who presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

The City Council expressed appreciation to the Rocklin Police Department for keeping the City safe, highlighting their professionalism, success with addre ssing e-bike safety concerns and partnership with RUSD, use of technology in the provision of police services, fast call center response times, addressing challenges with smoke shops, and acknowledged the recently hosted 2026 NorCal Law Enforcement Volunteer Symposium.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

PH1. Draft 2026 -2027 Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan
13 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 7 | P a g e

Action: Conducted a Public Hearing to Consider Testimony on the Proposed 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan, and Directed Staff to Prepare the Final Annual Action Plan.

Mayor Bass opened the public hearing for item PH1.

Management Analyst Gabrielle de Farcy presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

Mayor Bass closed the public hearing for item PH1.

Motion to approve Public Hearing Item No. PH1 by Vice Mayor Halldin, seconded by Council Member Janda. Motion passed by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
Mayor Bass
Noes: None

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None

PH2. Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / General Development Plan Amendment, PDG2026-0001 and Environmental, ENV2026-0001 Action: Conducted a Public Hearing and Considered the Following Actions:

A. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-036 of the City Council of the City of Rocklin approving a Notice of Exemption (Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / ENV2026-0001).

B. Introduced, Waived the Full Reading and Read by Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin amending the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use and to allow deviations from off -street parking standards, both subj ect to approval of a Conditional Use Permit within commercial zoning districts (Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / PDG2026-0001).

Mayor Bass opened the public hearing for item PH2.

Principal Planner Nathan Anderson presented the item to the City Council.

Members of the City Council asked questions, which were responded to by Principal Planner Anderson.

14 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 8 | P a g e

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

Mayor Bass closed the public hearing for item PH2.

Motion to approve Public Hearing Item No. PH2.A by Council Member Janda, seconded by Vice Mayor Halldin. Motion passed by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
Mayor Bass
Noes: None

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None

Motion to approve Public Hearing Item No. PH 2.B by Council Member Janda, seconded by Vice Mayor Halldin. Motion passed by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
Mayor Bass
Noes: None

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None

DISCUSSION ITEMS

D1. Amendments to the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to the Budget Process Action: Introduced, Waived the Full Reading and Read by Title Only, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending Section 2.28.020, and Chapter

3.28 of the Rocklin Mu nicipal Code Relating to the Preparation, Submission, and City Council's Adoption of the Budget.

Budget Officer Zonousia Lee presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

Motion to approve Discussion Item No. D1 by Council M ember Janda, seconded by Vice Mayor Halldin. Passed by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda
Mayor Bass
Noes: None

Absent: Council Member Broadway
Abstain: None
15 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 9 | P a g e

D2. 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report
Action: Received the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report.

Principal Planner Nathan Anderson presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

There were none.

D3. 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) and 2024-2025 Housing Successor Agency Annual Report
Action: Received the 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report and the FY 2024-2025 Housing Successor to Redevelopment Agency Annual Report.

Principal Planner Nathan Anderson presented the item to the City Council.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Benjamin Bjorkman addressed the City Council and requested an explanation on the discrepancy between issued accessory dwelling unit permits and completed units.

Members of the City Council asked questions, which were responded to by Principal Planner Anderson and City Manager Zimmermann.

D4. Inclusionary Housing Program and Commercial Linkage Fee Analyses Action: Received a report on the Inclusionary Housing Program and Commercial Linkage Fee Analyses, and provide direction to staff.

Assistant to the City Manager Elizabeth Sorg and Debbie Kern with Keyser Marston Associates presented the i tem to the City Council. Debbie Kern, City Manager Zimmermann and Assistant to the City Manager Sorg addressed questions.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mr. Jeff Short with the North State Building Industry Association, addressed the City Council and encouraged that any inclusionary policy that is adopted be accompanied with a reasonable in-lieu fee; supported the Planning Commission’s in-lieu fee recommendation; and underscored that ADUs were a t remendous asset.

Mr. John Tallman with Westpark Communities, addressed the City Council noting the economic link between commercial uses and housing; supported a commercial linkage fee; supported considering all tools to address affordability including ADUs 16 DRAFT Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2026 Rocklin City Council 10 | P a g e

and commercial fees ; concurred with the consultant ’s recommendation of 5% affordability requirement, and a $2.50 per square foot in-lieu fee.

City Council comments and questions continued. The City Council provided staff with direction to return with more information at a future City Council meeting to include a tiered fee structure for an in -lieu fee, proposed modifications to the ordinance and an option to repeal the ordinance.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

Council Member Gayaldo requested a future agenda item to review policies for ADU variance percentages.

ADJOURNMENT

The City Council observed a moment of silence for former Rocklin Mayor Ken Yorde, and Mayor Bass adjourned the meeting at 9:29 p.m. in his memory.

_____________________________
David Bass, Mayor

This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and
correct copy of the minutes of March 24, 2026 as
approved by the Rocklin City Council.

_______________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

17 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Proclamation Recognizing April as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Haley Reid, Management Analyst
Department:

City Manager's Office
Recommendation:

Approve a Proclamation Recognizing April as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month, and designate the Mayor to Sign the Proclamation on Behalf of the City Council.

Item Number C2.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proclamation Recognizing April 2026 as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month 18 Issued by the City Council

Proclamation

Arts, Culture & Creativity Month - April 2026

WHEREAS, Arts, Culture & Creativity Month of April is the 8th annual statewide celebration first established by the California legislature in 2019; and

WHEREAS, the City of Rocklin believes that arts, culture and creativity are essential to our community; and

WHEREAS, arts and culture is an industry that provides both economic and community benefits, and has an economic impact of over $26 million dollars in Placer County according to the Americans for the Arts: Arts & Economic Prosperity 6 study; and

WHEREAS, California is the fifth largest economy in the world, with a creative economy of approximately $261 billion representing 8% of the state’s GDP and 847,688 jobs in 2022 according to the U.S.

Bureau of Economic Analysis; and

WHEREAS, the benefits of the arts impact our HEALTH by reducing depression, lowering stress hormones, and increasing longevity through regular engagement and attendance at cultural events; and

WHEREAS, the benefits of the arts impact our HOPE by fostering a sense of community and personal fulfillment, inspiring optimism and resilience in the face of challenges; and

WHEREAS, the benefits of the arts impact our HEALING by offering therapeutic experiences that restore well-being, enhance mental and physical health, and support emotional recovery; and

WHEREAS, culture creates connections, sparks innovation, encourages understanding, and strengthens community; and

WHEREAS, the ARTS COUNCIL OF PLACER COUNTY leads efforts to advance the arts through programs, partnerships, and the community-building initiatives such as community grants and strategic partnerships; and

WHEREAS, this collective work at the local, regional, and throughout the state uplifts our community and changes our lives for the better.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Rocklin hereby declares April 2026 as Arts, Culture & Creativity Month, and encourages all Rocklin residents to join in the celebration.

In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused this seal to be affixed.

Dave Bass, Mayor
ATTEST:

_
Avinta Singh, City Clerk
19 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Amendments to the Rocklin Municipal Code Related to the Budget Process
(Second Reading of Ordinance)
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
Department:

City Clerk's Office
Recommendation:

Background:

On March 24, 2026, the City Council introduced, waived the full reading, and read by title only the following: A
n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Amending Sections

2.28.020, and Chapter 3.28 of the Rocklin Municipal Code Relating to the Preparation, Submission and City Council’s Adoption of the Budget.

The background materials for this item are contained in the March 24, 2026 City Council
Meeting Staff Report,

located on the City's website.

Item Number C3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance
20

Page 1 of 4 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN AMENDING SECTIONS 2.28.020, AND CHAPTER 3.28 OF THE

ROCKLIN MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE PREPARATION,
SUBMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL’S ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET

The City Council of the City of Rocklin does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Purpose and Intent . Chapter 2.28 of the Rocklin Municipal Code (RMC), entitled “Finance Director”, establishes the responsibility of the City to prepare and submit a budget to City Council on or before the 15th day of May each year.

Chapter 3.28 of the RMC, entitled “Budget” , establishes the procedures and authority for the submission and adoption of the City’s annual operating and capital budgets, including the City Manager’s duty to prepare and submit a proposed budget to the City Council, and the City Council’s responsibili ty to review, hold hearings on, and adopt the annual budget.

On June 24, 2025, the City Council adopted a two-year budget (Resolution No. 2025‑137) in place of the prior annual budget cycle. Accordingly, the City Council of the City of Rocklin seeks to re peal and replace Sections 2.28.020 and Chapter 3.28 of the Rocklin Municipal Code to provide for the submission and adoption of the budget on a two fiscal year basis, including a mid-cycle review as deemed necessary.

Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this ordinance under the authority granted to cities by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution and Government Code Section 37100.

Section 3. Repeal and Replace. Rocklin Municipal Code, Sections 2.28.020,

3.28.010, 3.28.020, 3.28.030, 3.28.040, 3.28.050, AND 3.28.060 are hereby repealed and replaced to read as follows:

2.28.020 Duties.

To carry out the duties and responsibilities of finance director for the city, the director shall:

A. Perform the duties formerly required of the city clerk pursuant to Sections 40802 through 40805 and Sections 37206 through 37209 of the Government Code, which duties are transferred to the finance director;

B. Prepare and submit a budget to the city council on or before the 15th day in May each odd-numbered year;

C. Exercise the duties of collector under the business tax ordinance; 21

Page 2 of 4 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
D. Act as accounting officer for the city and, in such capacity, supervise the maintenance of all records reflecting the financial conditions of the city;

E. Prepare monthly financial and budget reports as required by the city council;

F. Supervise the data processing of financial and other reports as required.

3.28.010 Proposal—Submission to council.

A. Not later than May 15 in in each odd-numbered year, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a proposed budget for the two fiscal year s commencing July 1 of odd-numbered year. Such budget shall contain itemized statements for recommended City expenditures and estimated revenues for each of the two fiscal years and be accompanied with a comprehensive budget memo presenting the various comp onents of the budget and their anticipated impact on the City’s fiscal condition.

B. The City Manager may require a Department Director or employee to furnish whatever information is deemed necessary to prepare the proposed budget.

C. The proposed two-year budget shall be accompanied by a proposed resolution establishing an organizational plan, positions and classifications of employment and fixing the compensation of employees and elected officers. Such resolution may delegate certain budgetary functio ns and authority to the City Manager as the City Council determines appropriate or necessary.

D. On at least one occasion during each even -numbered year, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a mid-cycle budget for the purpose of reporting of expenditures and budget status for year one of the two-year budget cycle and to review the second fiscal year of the adopted two -year budget. The mid -cycle review shall include updated revenue and expenditure projections and recommended appropriations as necessary to maintain a balanced budget. The mid -cycle review shall be submitted at a time determined by the City Manager.

3.28.020 Presentation —Revised budget.

The City Council shall conduct one or more budget workshops on the proposed two-year budget and shall make such changes therein as may be deemed appropriate. Thereafter, the City Manager shall submit to the City Council a revised two-year budget based on the changes directed by the City Council.

3.28.030 Final adoption.

Page 3 of 4 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
The City Council shall adopt a final budget for two fiscal years on or before June 30th of each odd -numbered year, by resolution. Adoption of the two -year budget shall constitute appropriations for each of the two fiscal years of the two - year budget period.

3.28.040 City Council control.

As often as may be deemed appropriate by the City Council, or as otherwise may be recommended by the City Manager, the City Manager shall submit reports, reviews, and recommendations to the City Council concerning the adopted budget, including but not limi ted to revisions or amendments to the two -year budget, for City Council review and adoption. The council shall control the submission, approval, amendment, and enforcement of the budget and the filing of claims thereunder by all City departments or employe es. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to limit or preclude the ability of the City Council to delegate to the City Manager any and all budgetary and administrative authority appropriate or necessary to effectuate and administer the adopted budget.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sectio ns, sub -sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. Environmental Analysis. The City Council hereby finds that this ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060, subdivision (c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061, subdivision (b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment).

Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the day of its adoption.

Section 7. Publication. Within fifteen (15) days of the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the ordinance, with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the ordinance, to be published in the Placer Herald. In lieu of publishing the full text of the ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen (15) days, shall cause a summary of the ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Council members voting for and against the ordinance, to be published in the Placer Herald, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the full text of the ordinance, along with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the ordinance. The 23

Page 4 of 4 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
publication of a summary of the ordinance in lieu of the full text of the ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code section 36933(c)(1) are met.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on March 24, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Bass, Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda

NOES: None

ABSENT: Councilmember Broadway

ABSTAIN: None

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on April 14, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

____________________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

First Reading: 03.24.2026
Second Reading: 04.14.2026
Effective Date: 05.14.2026
24 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment
(Second
Reading of Ordinance)
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
Department:

City Clerk's Office
Recommendation:

Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin amending the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use and to allow deviations from off-street parking standards, both subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit within commercial zoning districts (Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / PDG2026-0001).

Background:

On March 24, 2026, the City Council introduced, waived the full reading, and read by title only the following: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin amending the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use and to allow deviations from off-street parking standards, both subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit within commercial zoning districts (Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / PDG2026-0001).

The background materials for this item are contained in the March 24, 2026 City Council
Meeting Staff Report,

located on the City's website.

Item Number C4.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance
25

Page 1 of 3 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

AMENDING THE NORTHWEST ROCKLIN GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN TO ADD “RETAIL SALES – EXTERIOR SALES AND STORAGE”

AS A PERMITTED USE AND TO ALLOW DEVIATIONS FROM

OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS, BOTH SUBJECT TO

APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN

COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

(Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan Amendment / PDG2026-0001)

The City Council of the City of Rocklin does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Rocklin finds and determines that:

A. The project consists of a General Development Plan Amendment project (PDG2026-0001) (“Project”) to amend the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit, within certain commercial zoning districts, and to allow deviations from off -street parking standards to be approved through a Conditional Use Permit when parking deviations can be justified as part of the entitlement process; and

B. The General Development Plan Amendment amends Section 3.4.2, Table 7 of the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan to allow for “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit in the Planned Development Commercial (PD -C) and Planned Development Business Professional/Commercial (PD -BP/C) zoning distr icts within the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan area; and

C. The General Development Plan Amendment also amends Section 3.5.6, Off-Street Parking, to allow deviations from off -street parking standards to be approved through a Conditional Use Permit within the PD -C and PD -BP/C zoning districts, when such parking deviations can be justified as part of the entitlement process; and

D. A Notice of Exemption has been approved for this Project via City Council Resolution No. 2026-036; and

E. The commercial areas of the Northwest Rocklin GDP are physically suited to allow for the operation of “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage”, as well as justifiable deviations in parking standards, as authorized in the proposed General Development Plan Amendment; and

F. The proposed General Development Pl an Amendment to allow for the operation of “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage”, as well as to allow for justifiable 26

Page 2 of 3 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
deviations in parking standards, is compatible with the land uses existing and permitted on the properties in the vicinity; and

G. The land uses, and their density and intensity, allowed in the proposed General Development Plan Amendment are not likely to create serious health problems or create nuisances on properties in the vicinity. No physical development is currently proposed as p art of this pro posal. The operation of “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage”, as well as to allow for justifiable deviations in parking standards, would be required to be compatible with the land uses existing and permitted on the properties in the vicinity; and

H. The City Council has considered the effect of the proposed General Development Plan Amendment s on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. The operation of “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage”, as well as to allow for justifiable deviations in parking standards, would only be allowed in Commercial land uses, and are not anticipated to create any impact to housing needs in the region.

I. On February 17, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of Rocklin reviewed the project and, by a 5-0 vote, recommended its approval.

Section 2. Authority. The City Council enacts this Ordinance under the authority granted to cities by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution.

Section 3. Amendment to General Development Plan. The City Council of the City of Rocklin hereby approves a General Development Plan Amendment to amend the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan , originally adopted by Ordinance No. 858 in 2002 and most recently amended by Ordinance No. 1185 in 2024, to add “Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage” as a permitted use, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit, within certain commercial zoning districts, and to allow deviations from off-street parking standards to be approved through a Conditional Use Permit when parking deviations can be justified as part of the entitlement process, in the form as shown on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of th e fact that any one or more sections, sub -sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the day of its adoption.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Ordinance No. XXXX
Section 6. Publication. Within fifteen (15) days of passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the ordinance, a summary of the Ordinance, or an advertisement of the Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, in accordance with Government Code section 36933.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on March 24, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers Bass, Gayaldo, Halldin, Janda

NOES: None

ABSENT: Councilmember Broadway

ABSTAIN: None

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on April 14, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

___________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

First Reading: 03.24.2026
Second Reading: 04.14.2026
Effective Date: 05.14.2026

Page 1 ends

To Ordinance No. XXXX
EXHIBIT 1

Additions/amendments to the following sections of the Northwest Rocklin General Development Plan are showed in red underline.

3.4.2 Non-Residential Districts
Table 7 presents the permitted and conditionally permitted uses in non -residential districts.

Table 7
Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses in Non-Residential Districts
Uses Neigh.

Comm Comm BP BP /
Comm
Light
Indust.

Arcade / Billiard Parlor – U – U –
Automotive Dealership – U – U U
Automotive Dealership (entirely indoor
without repair) – P – P U
Automotive Repair Shop (Light) – U – U U
Automotive Repair Shop (Heavy) – – – – U
Banking, Insurance, Financial P P P P P
Broadcasting Studios – – – – U
Business Support Services (copy shops,
mailing services) P P P P P
Car Wash (stand alone or with gas station) – U – U –
Coin-operated laundry or pick-up station P P – P –
Convenience Stores P P – P –
Convenience store with gasoline sale – P – P –
Contractors yard – – – – U
Day Care Facilities U U U U U
Delicatessen P P P P P
Drive-through Facilities – P P P –
29

Page 2 ends

To Ordinance No. XXXX
Dry cleaners with on-site dry cleaning U U – U P
Death care services (mortuary and
cremation) – – – – U
Equipment rentals, indoor – – – – P
Equipment rentals, outdoor – – – – U
Farm Equipment & Supply Sales – – – – U
Gas Station – P – P U
Hard Liquor Sales (off-premise) – P – P –
Hospital – – – – U
Hotel / Lodging – U U U –
Indoor Sports & Recreation, Health &
Fitness Centers, Figure Salons – P U P U
Light Manufacturing and Processing – – – – P / U
(3)
Mail Order & Vending – – – – P
Massage Parlors – U – U –
Mini Storage – – – – U (7)
Mobile Pushcart Vending Facility U U U U U
Offices P P P P P
Outdoor Dining (more than 4 tables or 8
chairs) U U U U U
Personal Services (beauty/barber salon, dry
cleaners, dance studio without alcohol
sales, etc.)
P P – P –
Pet shop, grooming services P P – P –
Places of Assembly for Community Service – – P P U
Plant Nurseries (stand-alone or accessory
to a department store) – P – P P
Printing & Publishing – – – – P
Public Utility Facilities U U U U P
30

Page 3 ends

To Ordinance No. XXXX
Research and Development – – – – P
Restaurant, with or without bar P P P (6) P P
Restaurant ancillary to & within primary use P P P (6) P P Retail Sales (inside an enclosed building) P P – P –
Retail Sales – Exterior Sales and Storage – U – U –
Retail use, showroom, and training
appurtenant P P – P P
Schools, college & university – U U U U
Schools, private elementary and secondary U U U U –
Schools, public elementary and secondary P P P P P
Schools, specialized education & training – U P U U
Sports facility or other outdoor public
assembly – – – – U
Theaters (non adult) – U – U –
Uses involving public address system – U U U U
Uses that operate between 11 p.m. and 6
a.m. U P P P P
Vehicle rental storage (outside) – – – – U
Veterinary Clinic U U U U –
Warehousing and Distribution – – – – P
Wholesale Sales – – – – P
Woodworking and Cabinet Shops – – – – U

Legend: P = Permitted Use | U = Conditionally Permitted Use | – = Not Permitted

Page 4 ends

To Ordinance No. XXXX

3.5.6 Off Street Parking
Off street parking shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 17.66 of the Rocklin Municipal Code. Deviations from off street parking standards may be approved through a Conditional Use Permit within the PD -C and PD -BP/C zoning districts, when such parking deviations can be justified as part of the entitlement process.

32 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Amendments to Various Agreements for Legal Services
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Matthew McOmber, City Attorney
Department:

City Attorney's Office
Recommendation:

A
.

B
.

Background:

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
On December 31, 2024, the City entered into a Legal Services Agreement with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (the Firm) for labor negotiation and employment law issues as they arise, legal opinions, policy review, and other issues as determined necessary by the City Attorney for assignment to the Firm (the Agreement). The original Agreement authorized legal services up to $100,000. On September 9, 2025, by Resolution No. 2025-194, the City Council approved the First Amendment to increase the total compensation to $150,000 and on December 9, 2025, approved a Second Amendment to increase the total to $210,000. The Firm has provided legal services that are nearing the not-to-exceed amount, and the City Attorney, in conjunction with the Administrative Services Department anticipate the continued need for the Firm's specialized legal services, including labor negotiations and other matters.

Therefore, staff recommends approval of a third contract amendment to authorize an increase of the not-to-exceed amount of the Agreement to $250,000 and to authorize the City Attorney, as the purchasing officer for all contracts for legal services, to execute the third amendment.

The accompanying amendment would further delegate authority to the City Attorney to approve and sign amendments to the agreement such that effective July 1, 2026, the maximum amount payable by City to Firm would not exceed an additional $150,000 (One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars) per Fiscal Year, with corresponding updates to the period of performance through the later of June 30, 2029 or the conclusion of assigned matters.

Item Number C5.

33 Civica Law Group
On July 31, 2024, the City entered into a Legal Services Agreement with Civica law Group (the Firm) for specialized code enforcement and receiverships and related matters as determined necessary by the City Attorney for assignment to the Firm (the Agreement). The original Agreement authorized legal services up to $70,000, and was subsequently amended twice in accordance with Rocklin Municipal Code 3.04.040 and 3.04.050(B). The Firm has provided legal services that are nearing the not-to-exceed amount, and the City Attorney anticipates the continued need for the Firm's specialized legal services, including receivership legal services and other matters.

Therefore, staff recommends approval of a third contract amendment to authorize an increase of the not-to-exceed amount of the Agreement to $150,000 and to authorize the City Attorney, as the purchasing officer for all contracts for legal services, to execute the third amendment.

The accompanying resolution would further delegate authority to the City Attorney to approve and sign amendments to the agreement such that effective July 1, 2026, the maximum amount payable by City to Firm would not exceed an additional $100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars) per Fiscal Year, with corresponding updates to the "Term" through the later of June 30, 2029 or the conclusion of assigned matters.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no additional fiscal impact to the General Fund. Sufficient funds are available in the Fiscal Years 2025/26 & 2026/27 Operating Budgets to support the recommendation, and would be available in future years' operating budgets as adopted by the City Council.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution A

2. Resolution A Exhibit A - Third Amendment to LCW Agreement

3. LCW Agreement for Legal Services, as amended

4. Resolution B

5. Resolution B Exhibit A - Third Amendment to Civica Agreement for Special Counsel Legal Services

6. Civica Agreement for Special Counsel Legal Services, as amended 34 Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 1

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE

THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL

SERVICES WITH LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE

WHEREAS, the City of Rocklin (“City”) has a current Agreement for Legal Services (“Agreement”) with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (“Firm”) to provide for various legal services, as needed; and

WHEREAS, the City Cou ncil approved the First Amendment by Resolution No. 2025-194 to increase total compensation to $150,000, and to accept the Firms’ request for an increase of the Firm’s hourly rates consistent with comparable rates for such services; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Second Amendment by Resolution No. 2025-259 to increase total compensation to $210,000; and

WHEREAS, the City has further need for specialized legal services from the Firm and desires to amend the Agreement accordingly to increase the not-to-exceed amount applicable to the period ending June 30, 2026, by $40,000; to reflect and authorize future annual Fiscal Year maximum compensation limits; and amend the term governing period of performance.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rocklin as follows:

Section 1. The City Council approves and authorizes the City Attorney to execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore in the form attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
35 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 1 of 3
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROCKLIN AND LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE,

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

This Third Amendment is entered into between the City of Rocklin (“City”) and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Corporation (“Firm”).

R E C I T A L S

WHEREAS, City and Firm have previously entered into an agreement on December 31, 2024, to provide for various legal services (“Original Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was amended on September 10, 2025, to increase the not-to-exceed amount to $150,000.00 and increase the rates of compensation payable to Firm (“First Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, City and Firm amended the Agreement a second time on December 16, 2025, to increase the not-to-exceed amount to $210,000.00 (“Second Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, City and Firm desire to amend the Agreement a third time to increase the not- to-exceed amount applicable to the period ending J une 30, 2026, by $ 40,000.00; to authorize subsequent compensation limits on an annual Fiscal Year basis up to $1 50,000 per Fiscal Year; and to amend the period of performance (“Third Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, the Original Agreement , First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Third Amendment are collectively referred to as the “Agreement.”

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows:

I. The Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

II. Section 4 (Compensation), subparagraph A (Fees) of the Agreement is amended as of the effective date of this Third Amendment to read as follows:

4. COMPENSATION

A. Fees

FIRM shall provide legal services at the following billing rates:

Partners $450.00 per hour
Senior Counsel $375.00 per hour
Associates $275.00 - $355.00 per hour
Labor Relations/Human Resources Consultant $295.00 per hour Paralegals $165.00 per hour
E-Discovery Specialists $185.00 per hour
36 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 2 of 3
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

Law Clerks $180.00 - $200.00 per hour

In no eve nt shall the maximum amount payable for services rendered through June 30, 2026 under this agreement exceed $250,000.00 (Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars).

Thereafter, effective July 1, 2026, the maximum amount payable by City to Firm under this agreement shall not exceed $150,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars) per Fiscal Year. For purposes of this agreement, the term Fiscal Year means July 1 – June 30. The total compensation payable for final Fiscal Year that agreement in effect, shall be calculated on a monthly prorated basis.

III. Section 1 (Period of Performance) is amended as of the effective date of this Third Amendment to read as follows:

This Agreement shall begin December 31, 2024 and shall continue through and end on June 30, 2029, or upon the completion of the matter(s) and case(s) identified in this Agreement in Attachment A, or the completion of any other matter(s) or cases CITY, through its City Attorney, assigns to FIRM as provided in this Agreement, whichever is later, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 6 or paragraph 7.

IV. REAFFIRMATION

In all other respects, the Agreement, as amended, and any attachments, remains in full force and effect.

V. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

The Agreement, as amended, and any attachments, constitute the entire understanding between City and Firm.

VI. EFFECTIVE DATE

Unless otherwise provided, this Third Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the last date it is signed by both Parties.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS

37 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 3 of 3
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment to the Agreement. By their signatures below, each signatory represents that they have the authority to execute this Third Amendment and to bind the Party on whose behalf their execution is made.

CITY OF ROCKLIN

By: ____________________________ Date: ___________________________ Matthew McOmber
City Attorney

By: ____________________________
Avinta Singh
City Clerk

FIRM

By: ____________________________ Date: ___________________________ Melanie L. Chaney
Managing Partner

By: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________

Partner
38 1
AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, dated December 31, 2024, is made by and between CITY OF ROCKLIN, through its OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY (CITY) and LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE, a Professional Corporation (FIRM) . WHEREAS, CITY desires to contract for professional legal services; and WHEREAS, FIRM is particularly qualified to perform the required professional services due to its legal competence, experience, and expertise. NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and FIRM agree as follows: 1. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE This Agreement shall begin December 31, 2024 and shall continue for five years or until the completion of the matter(s) and case(s) identified in this Agreement in Attachment A, or the completion of any other matter(s) or cases CITY, through its City Attorney, assigns to FIRM as provided in this Agreement, whichever is later, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 6 or paragraph 7. 2. FIRM'S SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FIRM shall act as counsel to CITY and its officers and employees in matters or cases assigned to FIRM and shall consult with the City Attorney upon request on legal matters assigned to FIRM. FIRM shall make every effort to provide the most cost-effective services possible to CITY and shall suggest options and techniques to dispose of cases without unnecessary pleadings or discovery. FIRM shall timely communicate with the City Attorney as needed to keep City and City Attorney informed of material facts and status of assigned matters and cases. FIRM shall provide CITY with the necessary representation by staff qualified to perform the legal tasks at the least costly billing category. FIRM shall coordinate with City Attorney in performing services under this Agreement and upon request, shall report to the City Council, or to the City staff, as requested, regarding the matters or cases it is handling. 39 2
expert witness. FIRM shall assist City Attorney in settlement evaluations and negotiations and shall obtain CITY's authority before making any settlement proposal on CITY's behalf or to the Court or to any other party to the case(s). FIRM shall immediately notify City Attorney verbally and in writing when a judgment, verdict or other award is rendered. FIRM shall provide to City Attorney copies of all substantive pleadings and motions filed with the court or other administrative body, including those submitted by another party. FIRM shall also provide copies of all court rulings. FIRM shall compile and maintain all backup documentation to support all entries included in its billings. 3. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS A. FIRM shall provide City Attorney (with a separate copy to City's Risk Manager or insurance carrier) with the following reports for cases other than eminent domain cases: 1. Case Evaluation, Plan and Budget (a) The Case Evaluation, Plan and Budget is a confidential independent evaluation of the case that will serve as the basis for developing CITY's legal position and strategy and for controlling litigation costs. It will include a budget of foreseeable defense costs and the other information set forth in Attachment B. (b) The Case Evaluation, Plan and Budget shall be submitted to the City but no later than 60 days after FIRM first appears in the case. 2. Case Status Reports (a) A Case Status Report is a summary of the significant actions and developments in the case since the last report or since the submission of the Case Evaluation, Plan and Budget, as applicable. (b) The Case Status Report shall contain the information set forth in Attachment C. (c) FIRM shall ordinarily provide Case Status Reports every six months. 40 3
Between reports, FIRM shall telephonically advise City Attorney of important case developments or re-xposure and, if requested, prepare a Case Status Report. B. With regard to eminent domain actions assigned to FIRM, FIRM shall provide to City Attorney only those reports specifically requested by City Attorney. 4. COMPENSATION A. Fees FIRM shall provide legal services at the following billing rates: Partners: $435.00/hr. Senior Counsel: $365.00/hr. Associates: $260.00-345.00/hr. Labor Relations/Human Resources Consultant $280.00/hr. Classification and Compensation Consultant $200.00/hr. Paralegals: $145.00/hr. E-Discovery Specialist $145.00/hr. Law Clerks $145.00-185.00/hr. In no event shall the maximum amount payable under this agreement exceed $100,000 (one hundred thousand dollars). B. Expenses CITY shall reimburse FIRM for its actual out-of-pocket expenses but without any additional costs for having advanced the funds. FIRM shall note that CITY is exempt from all filing fee charges. 1. Reimbursable ordinary expenses shall include, but not be limited to: (a) Deposition fees. (b) Transcript fees. (c) Messenger service. (d) Process service. (e) Document reproduction by an outside vendor. (f) Document filing fees/costs. (g) Document retention and storage which may be necessary for large/document intensive cases. 41 4

2. Reimbursable extraordinary expenses shall include charges for which FIRM has obtained City Attorney's prior written approval. Such expenses shall include, but not be limited to: (a) (b) Expert witne (c) Expenses for travel provided shall be reimbursed at actual costs. FIRM shall travel by the most cost-effective means available, however, the hourly rates charged pursuant to section 4.A. above shall be limited to 50% of the rate provided in section 4.A. for travel outside of Placer County. (d) Investigative services costs. (e) E-discovery platforms. (f) Other expenses approved in writing in advance by City Attorney. (g) In all respects, FIRM is expected to and shall perform services, and incur expenses in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible. 3. Non-reimbursable expenses shall include, but not be limited to: (a) Staff time or overtime for performing secretarial, clerical, or word processing functions. (b) Charges for time spent to provide necessary information for CITY audits or billing inquiries. (c) Charges for work performed which had not been authorized by CITY. Such work shall be a gratuitous effort by FIRM. (d) Charges for photocopies. (e) Charges for online legal research. (f) Alcoholic beverages, personal sundry or other related expenses, recreational activities, in-room movies, or expenses for family members. All expenses are subject to review and acceptance by CITY. 5. BILLINGS AND PAYMENTS A. Billings 42 5

1. FIRM shall submit its itemized billing statement monthly to City Attorney; however, FIRM shall provide an interim billing upon request of City Attorney or if outstanding fees and costs exceed $15,000. 2. The original billing statement(s) shall be submitted to: City Attorney 3970 Rocklin Road Rocklin, CA 95677 With a courtesy copy to: [email protected] Director of Administrative Services 3970 Rocklin Road Rocklin, CA 95677 [email protected] 3. Each billing statement shall be itemized in a time reporting format acceptable to CITY and shall include original invoices, or an equivalent form of City-approved documentation, acceptable to the City for Auditor/Controller will not reimburse FIRM for expenses unless the original invoice or City-approved equivalent form of documentation is submitted. 4. FIRM shall have and maintain all backup documentation to support all entries included in the monthly billing statement. Such documentation shall be in a form subject to audit and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. FIRM shall make such documentation available to auditors upon request and in accordance with paragraph 11.E. B. Payments 1. CITY's legal, risk management and accounting staff shall review all billing statements. 2. CITY shall make its best effort to process payments promptly after receiving FIRM's monthly billing statement. CITY shall not pay interest or finance charges on any outstanding balance(s). 6. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part at any time CITY, in its sole discretion, deems termination to be in its best interest. CITY shall terminate services by delivering to FIRM a written Termination Notice specifying the extent to which services are terminated and the effective termination date. FIRM may terminate on sixty (60) days' written notice. During the sixty (60) day notice period, FIRM shall at CITY's request, transfer pending files or complete specified services, which may include a final report. 43 6

7. TERMINATION DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST If either FIRM or CITY determines a matter of professional conflict has arisen which should not or could not be postponed until the conclusion of the litigation, FIRM or CITY may give written notice of immediate termination of this Agreement subject to FIRM's duty to provide adequate representation until the appropriate substitutions can be made. 8. CLOSING REPORT UPON TERMINATION Upon CITY's request, FIRM shall deliver a Closing Report to CITY in the format required by CITY, after termination of this Agreement. 9. NOTICES All Notices and required reports shall be written and delivered via email or mailed by first class, postage prepaid, addressed to CITY or FIRM at the addresses below, or at any other address CITY or FIRM shall provide in writing to each other: A. If to CITY: Office of the City Attorney 3970 Rocklin Road Rocklin, CA 95677 With a courtesy copy to: [email protected] Director of Administrative Services 3970 Rocklin Road Rocklin, CA 95677 [email protected] Copies of reports, but not bills, shall also be sent to: B. If to FIRM: Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Attn: Jack Hughes, Partner 400 Capital Mall, Suite 1260 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 584-7000 10. ASSIGNMENT A. No part of this Agreement or any right or obligation arising from it is assignable without CITY's written consent. B. However, FIRM may retain consultants and experts as FIRM deems appropriate 44 7
after receiving CITY's written approval. 11. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. Indemnification 1. FIRM shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers against all claims, suits, actions, costs, expenses, audit exceptions (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees of City Attorney and counsel retained by CITY, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs), damages, judgments, or decrees by property loss or damage (including property of CITY) arising from the negligent acts, willful acts, or errors or omissions of FIRM or any of FIRM's subcontractors, any person employed under FIRM, or under any subcontractor, or in any capacity during the progress of the work or the provision of services undertaken pursuant to this agreement, except when the injury or loss is caused by the sole negligence or intentional wrongdoing of CITY. 2. FIRM shall also defend and indemnify CITY for any adverse determination made by the Internal Revenue Service or the State Franchise Tax Board and/or any other taxing or regulatory agency and shall defend, indemnify, status that would establish a liability on CITY for failure to make social security deductions or contributions or income tax withholding payments, or any other legally mandated payment. This provision shall survive the termination, expiration, or cancellation of this agreement. 3. For professional services provided under this agreement, FIRM shall indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, damage, and costs, including performance of the professional services provided under this agreement or from recklessness or willful misconduct. 4. FIRor action brought against CITY founded upon any claim, action or proceeding which is based upon the work or the provision of services undertaken pursuant to this agreement. B. Insurance 1. subcontractor shall obtain, from an insurance carrier authorized to transact business in the State of California, and maintain continuously during the 45 8
term of this agreement Commercial General Liability Insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, and other insurance necessary to protect the CITY and the public with limits of liability of not less than two million ($2,000,000) combined single limit bodily injury and property damage; such insurance shall be primary as to any other insurance maintained by CITY. The policy shall include an endorsement or amendment which names City of Rocklin, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds. If the above insurance is written on a Claims Made Form, the insurance shall be endorsed to provide an extended reporting period of not less than five years following termination of this Agreement. 2. FIRM and any subcontractor shall obtain and maintain continuously required Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance to cover FIRM, subcontractor, FIRM's partner(s), subcontractor's partner(s), carrier authorized to transact business in the State of California covering the full liability for compensation for injury to those employed by FIRM or Compensation carrier waives its right of subrogation against the CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers which might arise in connection with this agreement. FIRM hereby certifies that FIRM is aware of the provisions of section 3700 of the Labor Code, which requires every employer to insure against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and FIRM shall comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work or the provision of services pursuant to this agreement. 3. FIRM shall obtain and maintain continuously a policy of professional liability coverage with limits of liability of not less than five million ($5,000,000). 4. All insurance required by this Agreement shall be primary to and not contributing with any other insurance maintained by CITY. C. Independent Contractor Status 1. This Agreement is between the CITY and FIRM and is not intended, and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association, as between CITY and FIRM. 2. FIRM understands and agrees that all FIRM personnel furnishing services to CITY under this Agreement are employees solely of FIRM and not of CITY for purposes of workers' compensation laws and liability. 3. FIRM shall bear the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing workers' 46 9
compensation benefits to any FIRM personnel for injuries arising from services performed under this Agreement. D. Governing Laws This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. E. Record Retention and Inspection Within ten (10) days of CITY's written request, FIRM shall allow CITY or authorized State or Federal agencies or any duly authorized representative to have the right to access, examine, audit, excerpt, copy or transcribe any pertinent transaction, activity, timesheets or other records relating to this Agreement. FIRM shall keep such material, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records and proprietary data for a period of four (4) years after termination or completion of this Agreement unless CITY's written permission is given to dispose of material prior to the end of such period or until such time as all audits are complete, whichever is later. F. Communications With CITY FIRM understands that the City Attorney is the legally empowered legal representative of the CITY and its officers and employees and FIRM shall not without specific direction from the City Attorney communicate with, advise or represent the CITY, its City Council or any other officers or employees. G. Validity The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision. H. Waiver No waiver of a breach of any provision of this Agreement by either party shall constitute a waiver of any other breach of the provision or any other provision of this Agreement. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement at any time shall not be construed as a waiver of that provision. 12. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS A. Attachments A through C are attached and incorporated as part of this Agreement. The attachments are titled as follows: 1. Attachment A - List of Assigned Matters and Cases 2. Attachment B - Information required for Case Evaluation, Plan and Budget 47 10

3. Attachment C - Information required for Case Status Report B. This Agreement shall constitute the complete and exclusive statement of understanding between CITY and FIRM which supersedes all previous written or oral agreements, and all prior communications between the CITY and FIRM relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. 13. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FIRM shall perform all services required pursuant to this Agreement in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which FIRM is engaged in the geographical area in which FIRM practices its profession. All products of whatsoever nature which FIRM delivers to CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be prepared in a substantial first class manner and conform to the standards of quality 14. PERSONNEL FIRM shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that CITY, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the removal of any person or persons assigned by FIRM to perform services pursuant to this Agreement, FIRM shall remove any such person immediately upon receiving notice from CITY of the desire of CITY for removal of such person or persons. All personnel performing services for FIRM shall be solely employees of FIRM and not employees of the CITY. FIRM shall be solely responsible for the salaries and other Compensation, of all such personnel. 15. NON-DISCRIMINATION FIRM shall not discriminate in its employment practices because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, or sex in contravention of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900 et seq. 16. COUNTERPARTS/ELECTRONIC, FACSIMILE, AND PDF SIGNATURES This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will be an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. Each Party of this agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet Civ. Code §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this agreement. The Parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with 48 11
the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among Parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the Parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. Facsimile signatures or signatures transmitted via pdf document shall be treated as originals for all purposes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and FIRM have executed this agreement on the dates set forth below. By their signatures below, each signatory represents that they have the authority to execute this agreement and to bind the Party on whose behalf their execution is made. CITY OF ROCKLIN By:_________________________________ Aly Zimmermann, City Manager City of Rocklin ATTEST: By:_________________________________ Avinta Singh, City Clerk Approved as to form: By:_________________________________ Matthew McOmber, City Attorney FIRM By:________________________________ J. Scott Tiedemann, Managing Partner By:________________________________ Jack Hughes, Partner 49 12

50 13
ATTACHMENT A LIST OF MATTERS AND CASES ASSIGNED TO FIRM LABOR NEGOTIATOR SERVICES Representation, advice, and counsel necessary to serve as the Chief Labor Negotiator for Fire, POA and PSM negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreements or an extension of the current agreement, respectively. Advise the City concerning updates, standards, best practices, and other issues applicable to the -Employee Relations Policy Procedures for the Administration of Employee-Employer Relations Between the City and its . and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) and the minimum for CalPers Medical. Advise on revisions to For purposes of compliance with section 11(F) , the Director of Administrative Services, City Manager, and City Attorney as needed, with respect to the foregoing matters identified as Labor Negotiator Services. GENERAL OTHER MATTERS AS ASSIGNED BY CITY ATTORNEY General public agency advice including but not limited to advice regarding liability and litigation assigned by the City Attorney. Advise the City concerning updates, standards, best practices, and other issues applicable to the City Personnel Rules and related rules and policies assigned by the City Attorney. Any other legal matter assigned in writing by City Attorney to FIRM and accepted in writing by FIRM. 51 14
ATTACHMENT B CASE EVALUATION, PLAN AND BUDGET This report shall provide a thorough evaluation of the case based on the information then quotations from the complaint. It shall also contain a succinct evaluation of the CITwith citations to the controlling legal authorities, but without unnecessary detail. f the case in its entirety, as well as necessary discovery. The report shall include a defense budget which indicates the projected cost of each major case activity, including trial. The report shall contain suggestions to contain defense costs, with the potential benefits and disadvantages of each cost-saving technique. FIRM shall also give its recommendations regarding settlement. Reports for cases with complex fact patterns, multiple parties, or numerous causes of action will be lengthier and more detailed than the reports for simpler cases. 52 15
ATTACHMENT C CASE STATUS REPORT The Case Status Report is intended to update CITY on major case developments and to rategy. The CITY does not want to receive page-by page deposition or medical record summaries of the controlling facts and authorities is sufficient. The activities remain within the previously-established defense budget. the likely dollar ranges for settlement and verdict. 53 54
55 56
57 Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE

THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL

COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES WITH CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC

WHEREAS, on July 31, 2024, the City of Rocklin (“City”) entered into an Agreement for Special Counsel Legal Services (“Agreement”), with Civica Law Group, APC (“Law Firm”) to provide legal advice, representation, and assistance to the City for various assigned matters for a total not-to-exceed amount of $50,000.00; and

WHEREAS, the City amended the Agreement on May 22, 2025, to increase the total compensation payable to Law Firm to $70,000.00; and

WHEREAS, the City amended the Agreement a second time on October 30, 2025, to increase the total compensation payable to Law Firm to $85,000.00; and

WHEREAS, the City has further need for specialized legal services from the Law Firm and desires to amend the Agreement a third time to amend the term and increase the total not-to-exceed amount to $150,000.000.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rocklin as follows:

Section 1. The City Council approves and authorizes the City Attorney to execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Legal Services with Civica Law Group, APC in the form attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 2. Beginning July 1, 2026, the City Attorney may, on an as needed basis, authorize and sign amendments to the Agreement for Special Counsel Legal Services with the Law Firm in order to increase the not-to-exceed compensation to a maximum of $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Dollars) per Fiscal Year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

David Bass, Mayor
ATTEST:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
58 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 1 of 3
Civica Law Group, APC

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROCKLIN AND CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC

FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES

This Third Amendment is entered into between the City of Rocklin (“City”) and Civica Law Group, APC, a California Professional Corporation engaged in the practice of law in the State of California (“Law Firm”).

R E C I T A L S

WHEREAS, City and Law Firm have previously entered into an agreement on July 31, 2024, to provide legal advice, representation and assistance to the City regarding code enforcement and other matters assigned in writing to Law Firm by the City Attorney for a total not -to-exceed amount of $50,000.00 (“Original Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was amended on May 22, 2025, effective May 22, 2025 to increase the total compensation payable to Law Firm to $70,000.00 (“First Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, City and Law Firm amended the Agreement a second time on October 30, 2025, to increase the total compensation payable to Law Firm to $ 85,000.00 (“Second Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, Law Firm has specialized expertise and experience in the subject of code enforcement, receiverships, and related legal matters, for which the City may from time to time require on an expedited basis; and

WHEREAS, City and Law Firm desire to amend the Agreement a third time to amend the term and increase the amount of compensation payable to Law Firm by $65,000.00 (Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars) (“Third Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, the Original Agreement , First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Third Amendment are collectively referred to as the “Agreement”.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows:

I. Subsection 3.3 (Compensation) of Section 3 (Terms) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

“3.3 Compensation. For all legal services provided in this Agreement, the City will pay Law Firm at the blended rate of $310 per hour for attorney representation and $180 per hour for paralegals and law clerks, but in no event shall the total compensation exceed the total sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00). Fees shall increase by up to five percent (5%), rounded to the nearest dollar, each fiscal year, to offset rising costs. Law Firm does not charge a retainer. In all respect, Law Firm is expected to 59 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 2 of 3
Civica Law Group, APC

perform services, and incur expenses, in the most effici ent and cost -effective manner possible.”

Further, Subsection 3.10 (Term; Termination of Agreement ) of Section 3 (Terms) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

“3.10 Term; Termination of Agreement . The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of July 31, 2024, and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2029, or the completion of any other matter(s) or cases that City, through its City Attorney, assigns to Law Firm as provided in this Agreement, whichever is later, unless this Agreement is earlier terminated as provided herein. City or Law Firm may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, on thirty (30) days’ written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, Law Firm shall comply with all provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the termination of a client relationship and the City shall pay Law Firm professional fee s and costs, in accordance with this Agreement, for all services provided and costs incurred through the date of termination of this Agreement. The City agrees to execute, upon request, a stipulation in such form as to permit Law Firm to withdraw as attorneys of record in any legal action then pending. Law Firm shall cooperate to transition representation to a new attorney or firm in an expedient manner and make available to the City, or to counsel designated by the City, all documents and records of the legal services provide d to the City and shall assist t o the fullest extent possible in the orderly tran sition of all pending matter s to the City’s new counsel. If City does not take possession of the client files within sixty (60) days of termi nation of this Agreement, City agrees that Law Firm may dispose of the client files without further notice.”

II. REAFFIRMATION

In all other respects, the Agreement, as amended, and any attachments, remains in full force and effect.

III. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

The Agreement, as amended, and any attachments, constitute the entire understanding between City and Law Firm.

IV. EFFECTIVE DATE

Unless otherwise provided, this Third Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the last date it is signed by both Parties.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS

60 THIRD AMENDMENT Page 3 of 3
Civica Law Group, APC

CITY OF ROCKLIN

Date: By:

Matthew McOmber
City Attorney

CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC

Date: By:

Matthew Silver, Esq.

Managing Partner

61 1
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CIVICA LAW GROUP, APCAND THE CITY OF ROCKLIN FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL LEGAL SERVICES 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This agreement is entered into and made effective on July 31, 2024, by and between the CITY OF ROCKLIN City, and CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC, a California Professional Corporation engaged in the practice of law in the State of California Law Firm. Law Firm and the City In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree to the terms of this Agreement as set forth herein. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 The City wishes to engage the services of Law Firm to provide special counsel legal services as described in this Agreement. Law Firm wishes to provide all such services and has the necessary expertise and competency to provide such services. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Scope of Services. Law Firm shall provide legal advice, representation and assistance to the City regarding code enforcement and other matters assigned in writing to Law Firm by the City Attorney. Law Firm shall report on a regular basis to, and subject to the input and direction of, the City and City Attorney. 3.2 Responsibilities of Attorneys and Client. Law Firm shall fully cooperate with the City and will keep the City and its staff informed of the status and progress of all pending matters and all legal matters of importance with which Law Firm is involved. Law Firm will manage and control the delivery of all legal services described hereunder in a professional, competent, and cost-effective manner. The City agrees to provide all information and documentation necessary for the attorneys at Law Firm to perform their obligations under this Agreement. 3.3 Compensation. For all legal services provided in this Agreement, the City will pay Law Firm at the blended rate of $310 per hour for attorney representation and $180 per hour for paralegals and law clerks, but in no event shall the total compensation exceed the total sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). Fees shall increase by up to five percent, rounded up to the nearest dollar, each fiscal year, to offset rising costs. Law Firm does not charge a retainer. In all respects, Law Firm is expected to perform services, and incur expenses, in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible. 3.4 Cost Reimbursement. The City shall reimburse Law Firm for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Law Firm in providing legal services under this Agreement, including charges for printing and copying expenses at $.16 for black and white copies and $.60 for color copies, postage, research, litigation costs, courier and messenger services, travel and automobile mileage at the current IRS rate for travel on behalf of the City. No separate charge shall be made by Law Firm for secretarial or word processing services. Law Firm shall obtain approval from the City prior to retention of any expert witness(s) or consultant(s), and upon such approval, Law Firm 62 2
shall pay such charges or fees on behalf of the City subject to reimbursement by the City.3.5 Statements and Billing. Law Firm shall submit monthly invoices to the City indicating attorney fees and costs incurred for the legal services provided under this Agreement. The monthly invoice shall describe the nature of the work performed, the attorney performing the work and the time spent for each task in .1 increments, as well as the nature of any reimbursable expenses incurred. Upon the request of and as directed by the City, Law Firm shall generate separate invoices pertaining to specific accounts, third party consultants, expert witness services, matters and/or departments. The City shall process and cause such invoices to be paid promptly, typically within thirty (30) days of receipt of an approved invoice. If no attorney fees or costs are incurred for a particular month, or if they are minimal, the statement may be held and combined with that for the following month. 3.6 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the attorneys at Law Firm were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Law Firm shall not contract with any other person or entity to perform, in whole or in part, the legal services required under this Agreement without the written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement, nor any interest herein, may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered voluntarily, or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of the City. 3.7 Conflicts of Interest. Law Firm shall comply with all applicable laws and professional rules and standards relating to any known conflict of interest involving the City and matters upon which Law Firm is providing legal services under this Agreement. Law Firm shall not reveal confidential information of the City except with the consent of the Board of Supervisors or as otherwise required by law. Law Firm shall notify the City of any conflict of interest related to matters upon which it is providing legal services under this Agreement upon discovery of any such conflicts. In the event that such conflict is not or cannot be waived or resolved City shall retain legal counsel and Law Firm shall assist and cooperate with legal counsel retained by the City on the matter for which the conflict arose. 3.8 Return of Files. At the conclusion of this Agreement, any original files transmitted to Law Firm by the City for the work performed under this Agreement for the City shall be made available to City. Law Firm will be entitled to make copies of the client files. At the conclusion of this Agreement, (whether or not City takes possession of the client files), Law Firm shall have no further responsibility with regard to such documents. 3.9 Independent Contractor. No employment relationship is created by this Agreement. Law Firm shall perform all legal services required under this Agreement as an independent contractor of the City, except that at all times proviemployees and agents shall be acting as public officials. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of any legal claims against Law Firm arising from its provision of services to the City, Law Firm shall be entitled to all defenses provided by law to City officials, attorneys and statutory duties to the office of city prosecutor/attorney pursuant to Government Code section 825 for providing a defense, hold harmless, and full indemnity to Law Firm for actions within the scope of its engagement hereunder. 3.10 Term; Termination of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date set forth in this Agreement and shall continue in full force and effect until 63 3
terminated as provided herein. City or Law Firm may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, on written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, Law Firm shall comply with all provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the termination of a client relationship and the City shall pay Law Firm professional fees and costs, in accordance with this Agreement, for all services provided and costs incurred through the date of termination of this Agreement. The City agrees to execute, upon request, a stipulation in such form as to permit Law Firm to withdraw as attorneys of record in any legal action then pending. Law Firm shall cooperate to transition representation to a new attorney or firm in an expedient manner and make available to the City, or to counsel designated by the City, all documents and records of the legal services provided to the City and shall assist to the fullest extent possible in the orderly transition of all pending matters to the City If City does not take possession of the client files within sixty (60) days of termination of this Agreement, City agrees that Law Firm may dispose of the client files without further notice. 3.11. Indemnification 1. Law Firm shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers against all claims, suits, actions, costs, expenses, audit exceptions (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees of City Attorney and counsel retained by City Attorney, expert fees, litigation costs, and loss or injury, including death, or property loss or damage (including property of City) arising from subcontractors, any person employed under Law Firm, or under any subcontractor, or in any capacity during the progress of the work or the provision of services undertaken pursuant to this agreement, except when the injury or loss is caused by the sole negligence or intentional wrongdoing of Law Firm. 2. Law Firm shall also defend and indemnify City for any adverse determination made by the Internal Revenue Service or the State Franchise Tax Board and/or any other taxing or regulatory agency and shall defend, indemnify, and hold a liability on City for failure to make social security deductions or contributions or income tax withholding payments, or any other legally mandated payment. This provision shall survive the termination, expiration, or cancellation of this agreement. 3. For professional services provided under this agreement, Law Firm shall indemnify, and hold harmless City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, or resulting from the negligent performance of the professional services provided under this agreement or from recklessness or willful misconduct. 3.12 Insurance Coverage. Law Firm shall carry errors and omissions insurance of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per year in the aggregate, and any additional insurance required by the State of California. Law Firm shall furnish to the City proof of insurance required by this Agreement upon request, and shall notify the City of any changes to the insurance. 3.13 Amendment; Modification. This agreement may be modified through a written 64 4
instrument signed by both parties or by an oral agreement to the extent it is carried out.3.14 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. 3.15 Time of Performance; Efficiency of Services; Cooperation. The services of Law Firm shall be performed expeditiously in light of the purposes of this Agreement. Law Firm shall follow all procedures as established by the City consistent with its duties. Law Firm shall work cooperatively with appropriate City staff and keep them informed on all matters of importance as they arise. 3.16 Non-Discrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, Law Firm shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, marital status, age, sexual orientation, or medical condition. 3.17 Waiver. No delay or omission to exercise any right, power or remedy accruing to City under this Agreement shall impair any right, power or remedy of City, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of, or consent to, any breach or default. No waiver of any breach, any failure of a condition, or any right or remedy under this Agreement: (1) shall be deemed effective unless it is in writing and signed by City; (2) shall be deemed to be a waiver of, or consent to, any other breach, failure of a condition, or right or remedy; or (3) shall be deemed to constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing expressly so states. 3.18 Governing Law and Interpretation. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles. The section captions and headings in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience only, and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction. 3.19 Severability. If any portion or all of this Agreement is held to be unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of that provision and the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 3.20 Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: To Law Firm: Civica Law Group, APC 3240 El Camino Real, Suite 190 Irvine, CA 92602 (949) 592-0165 Attn: Chief Operating Officer To City: City of Rocklin 3970 Rocklin Road Rocklin, CA 95677 (916) 625-5583 Attn: City Attorney 65 5
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument. Each Party of this agreement agrees to the use of electronic signatures, such as digital signatures that meet the §§ 1633.1 to 1633.17), for executing this agreement. The Parties further agree that the electronic signatures of the Parties included in this agreement are intended to authenticate this writing and to have the same force and effect as manual signatures. Electronic signature means an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record pursuant to the CUETA as amended from time to time. The CUETA authorizes use of an electronic signature for transactions and contracts among Parties in California, including a government agency. Digital signature means an electronic identifier, created by computer, intended by the party using it to have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature, and shall be reasonably relied upon by the Parties. For purposes of this section, a digital signature is a type of "electronic signature" as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 1633.2 of the Civil Code. Facsimile signatures or signatures transmitted via pdf document shall be treated as originals for all purposes. CITY OF ROCKLIN By: ____________________________ Dated: ________________________ Aly Zimmermann City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: ____________________________ Dated: ________________________ Matthew McOmber City Attorney CIVICA LAW GROUP, APC By: ____________________________ Dated: ________________________ Matthew Silver, Esq. Managing Partner 66 67
68 69
70 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Vacant Property Weed Abatement
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Rick Lawrence, Public Works Manager
Justin Nartker, Public Works Director
Department:

Public Works
Recommendation:

Background:

Rocklin Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 8.12 requires that the property owners of vacant parcels within the City clear their properties of weeds and debris thereby eliminating potential fire hazards. This requires continual maintenance, during the fire season, as weeds are seasonal and continue to grow making them a recurrent nuisance pursuant to California Government Code Section 39562.1.

As part of the weed abatement and rubbish program, the City will send a notification letter (Attachment 3) to approximately 160 property owners (Attachment 2) reminding them of their responsibility to maintain their parcels on an annual basis, as well as, provide them with the City Council adopted Vegetation Maintenance Standards, the date for the protest hearing, and other pertinent timeframes involved. Failure to comply will result in the City performing the weed abatement and charging parcel owners for the services rendered. If payment is not made to the City, a lien will be placed against the property.

Declaring the private parcels a public nuisances will allow the City to take action in the event the owners do not complete the required weed abatement by June 1, 2026, and/or fail to address the re-growth issue during the burn season.

To complete the weed and rubbish abatement process, the City is required to hold a notice to protest hearing to hear objections from any landowners whose property has been declared a nuisance. As required by statute, notices will be sent to the owners of the properties declared a nuisance, via certified letters mailed April 15, 2026, and the Protest Hearing will be set for the April 28, 2026, City Council Meeting. After hearing any objections, the City Council shall allow or overrule any objections. At that time, the City Council will acquire jurisdiction to Item Number C6.

71 proceed and perform the work of removal, and by approving the attached resolution makes the order to proceed with abatement.

Fiscal Impact:

Any weed abatement activities undertaken by the City will be billed to the respective property owner for full cost recovery. In the event payment is not received, the City will pursue cost recovery through the placement of a lien against the property in accordance with applicable laws and procedures.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Resolution Exhibit A - Property List

3. City Notification Letter
72 Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

DECLARING CONDITIONS AT LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF

ROCKLIN TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, ORDERING WEED

ABATEMENT OF SAME, AND SETTING THE DATE AND TIME

FOR A PROTEST HEARING

WHEREAS, t here is an accumulation of combustibles, weeds, and other rank growth on the vacant parcels identified in Exhibit “A ,” which pose a hazard to the public health and safety , those conditions constitute a public nuisance , and substantially increase the fire hazard; and

WHEREAS, the City’s Standards for Mainte nance of Vacant Parcels and Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 require property owners of vacant parcels within the City to clear their properties of weeds and debris thereby eliminating pote ntial fire hazards; and
WHEREAS, declaring the properties identified in Exhibit “A,” public nuisances will allow the City to take action in the event the owners do not complete the required weed abatement by June 1, 20 26, and/or fail to address the re -growth issue during the burn season
.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rocklin does resolve as follows:

Section 1. Upon sufficient information pres ented to the City Council by City staff the Council finds and declares that conditions at the locations l isted on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, constitute a public nuisance and are detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. The City Council also finds and declares that weeds on the locations listed on Exhi bit “A” are seasonal and recurrent nuisances.

Section 2. The City Council orders that the nuisance be abated in accordance with the City’s Vegetation Maintenance Standards and the Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 before June 1 st, 2026, or the prope rty owners show cause to the City Council at a hearing on April 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the City Council Chambers. If such abatement is not accomplished in the time set forth above, or if satisfactory ca use is not shown as to why it should not be abated, the City may cause the abatement to be accomplished an d the cost thereof shall be placed as a special assessment against the property.

Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice to the owners of the property in accordance with provisions of Section 39567.1 of the Government Code.

73 Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 2 of 2
1 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

____________________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

74 EXHIBIT A
010-072-002-000 4920 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-072-012-000 4970 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-072-015-000 4950 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-082-059-000 4700 GROVE ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-091-018-000 4855 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-091-022-000 4830 SAN FRANCISCO ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-092-010-000 4975 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-122-009-000 5145 RAILROAD AV ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-122-011-000 RAILROAD AV ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-134-010-000 5160 HIGH ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-144-007-000 FRONT ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-144-008-000 FRONT ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-170-002-000 5235 PACIFIC ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-181-084-000 4125 DIEGO WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-181-085-000 4135 DIEGO WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-191-004-000 WILLARD WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-210-013-000 5420 FRONT ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-230-008-000 5425 RUHKALA RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-250-042-000 3985 WINDING LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-480-005-000 4109 HARDROCK CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
010-480-022-000 4010 DELLA CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
016-090-024-000 4625 NORTH STAR ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
016-100-031-000 4915 TOPAZ AV ROCKLIN CA 95677
016-180-004-000 5410 PARAGON ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
016-180-005-000 5400 PARAGON ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
016-210-002-000 5450 PARAGON ST ROCKLIN CA 95677
017-084-001-000 908 UNIVERSITY AV ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-084-011-000 901 UNIVERSITY AV ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-086-013-000 1420 W STANFORD RANCH RD ROCKLIN CA 95677 017-171-043-000 1271 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-171-047-000 1161 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-284-006-000 1110 SUNSET BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-284-007-000 1130 SUNSET BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-284-020-000 1200 SUNSET BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-284-021-000 1210 SUNSET BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-350-031-000 5941 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
017-460-001-000 6041 STANFORD RANCH RD ROCKLIN CA 95765 030-041-031-000 3400 CLOVER VALLEY RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
030-200-033-000 3962 RAWHIDE RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
030-210-068-000 3932 RAWHIDE RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
030-210-069-000 3934 RAWHIDE RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-011-046-000 4080 DELMAR AV ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-031-013-000 4455 CIRCUIT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-031-014-000 4465 CIRCUIT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-043-080-000 4064 DIAS LN ROCKLIN CA 95650
045-080-033-000 4469 GRANITE DR ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-103-006-000 4555 ROCKLIN RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-110-062-000 4470 ROCKLIN RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
75 EXHIBIT A
045-110-066-000 5500 CHINA GARDEN RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-120-029-000 5520 CHINA GARDEN RD ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-120-062-000 4540 MONUMENT SPRINGS DR ROCKLIN CA 95677 045-131-016-000 4651 EL DON DR ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-190-008-000 4500 IVY LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-260-044-000 2491 SIERRA MEADOWS DR ROCKLIN CA 95677 045-590-005-000 4409 REDSTART LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-006-000 4411 REDSTART LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-007-000 4413 REDSTART LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-008-000 4704 GADWALL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-009-000 4702 GADWALL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-010-000 4700 GADWALL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-017-000 4366 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-018-000 4364 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-019-000 4362 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-020-000 4360 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-021-000 4358 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-022-000 4356 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-023-000 4354 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-024-000 4357 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-025-000 4803 MIRAGE LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-026-000 4801 MIRAGE LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-027-000 4800 MIRAGE LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-028-000 4802 MIRAGE LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-029-000 4903 CAMBER LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-030-000 4901 CAMBER LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-031-000 4900 CAMBER LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-032-000 4902 CAMBER LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-033-000 5005 TRIUMPH LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-034-000 5001 TRIUMPH LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-035-000 5004 TRIUMPH LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-036-000 5002 TRIUMPH LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-037-000 5000 TRIUMPH LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-038-000 4375 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
045-590-039-000 4377 ROBINSON WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-001-000 3863 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-002-000 3867 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-003-000 3871 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-004-000 3875 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-005-000 3879 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-006-000 3883 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-007-000 4001 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-008-000 4005 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-009-000 4009 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-010-000 4013 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-011-000 4017 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-012-000 4021 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-013-000 4025 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
76 EXHIBIT A
046-640-014-000 4029 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-016-000 3939 CALVERHALL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-018-000 3940 CALVERHALL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-019-000 3936 CALVERHALL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-020-000 3932 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-021-000 3928 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-022-000 3924 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-023-000 3920 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-024-000 3916 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-025-000 3912 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-026-000 3915 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-027-000 3919 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-028-000 3923 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-030-000 4022 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-031-000 4018 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-032-000 4014 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-033-000 4010 YORK HILL LN ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-035-000 3872 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-036-000 3868 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-037-000 3864 ROCK HILL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-038-000 3901 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-039-000 3905 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-040-000 3909 CALVERHALL WY ROCKLIN CA 95677
046-640-046-000 3860 ROCK HILL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
364-090-024-000 2300 SUNSET BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-067-000 6351 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-068-000 6341 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-069-000 6331 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-070-000 6321 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-071-000 6311 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
365-020-072-000 6301 WEST OAKS BL ROCKLIN CA 95765
371-010-005-000 3645 AMETHYST DR ROCKLIN CA 95677
372-210-007-000 4220 SHADY MILLS CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-008-000 4215 SHADY MILLS CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-009-000 4210 SHADY MILLS CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-010-000 4205 SHADY MILLS CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-011-000 1304 BEAR CREEK DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-015-000 1320 BEAR CREEK DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-037-000 1200 BUCK RIDGE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-038-000 1202 BUCK RIDGE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
372-210-052-000 1321 BEAR CREEK DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-060-002-000 2312 CLUBHOUSE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-070-006-000 2336 CLUBHOUSE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-180-029-000 3928 WOODHOUSE CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-200-003-000 2578 CLUBHOUSE DR W ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-200-012-000 2596 CLUBHOUSE DR W ROCKLIN CA 95765
374-270-014-000 3841 IRON WHEEL CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
376-020-002-000 3704 STONE TEMPLE CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
77 EXHIBIT A
376-020-004-000 3708 STONE TEMPLE CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
376-020-010-000 3713 STONE TEMPLE CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
376-030-004-000 2382 CLUBHOUSE DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
376-030-015-000 3750 CLUBHOUSE CT ROCKLIN CA 95765
376-060-002-000 3820 WHITNEY OAKS DR ROCKLIN CA 95765
453-130-013-000 5841 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
453-130-014-000 5851 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
453-130-015-000 5861 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
453-130-016-000 5871 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
453-130-017-000 5881 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
453-130-018-000 5891 LILY PAD CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
454-040-007-000 4025 CORNWALL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
454-040-012-000 4013 CORNWALL CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
491-040-023-000 1119 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-033-000 1124 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-034-000 1122 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-035-000 1120 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-036-000 1129 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-037-000 1131 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-038-000 1133 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-039-000 1135 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-040-000 1134 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-041-000 1132 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-042-000 1130 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-043-000 1128 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-044-000 1161 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-045-000 1163 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-046-000 1165 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-047-000 1167 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-048-000 1166 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-049-000 1164 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-050-000 1162 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-051-000 1160 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-052-000 1177 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-053-000 1179 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-054-000 1181 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-055-000 1183 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-056-000 1182 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-057-000 1180 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-058-000 1178 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-059-000 1176 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-060-000 1193 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-061-000 1195 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-062-000 1197 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-063-000 1199 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-064-000 1198 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-065-000 1196 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-066-000 1194 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
78 EXHIBIT A
491-040-067-000 1192 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-068-000 1136 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-069-000 1138 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-070-000 1140 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-071-000 1142 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-072-000 1144 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-073-000 1146 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-074-000 1148 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-075-000 1150 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-076-000 1152 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-077-000 1154 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-078-000 1156 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-079-000 1158 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-080-000 1168 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-081-000 1170 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-040-088-000 1200 BENGAL LP ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-050-003-000 1041 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-050-004-000 1031 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-050-005-000 1021 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
491-050-006-000 1011 WHITNEY RANCH PW ROCKLIN CA 95765
497-080-053-000 2900 SONGBIRD WY ROCKLIN CA 95765
497-090-007-000 3042 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-009-000 3050 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-014-000 3070 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-015-000 3074 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-016-000 3078 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-017-000 3082 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-019-000 3090 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-020-000 3094 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-024-000 3109 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-025-000 3105 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-026-000 3101 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-027-000 3097 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-028-000 3093 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-029-000 3089 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-030-000 3085 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-031-000 3081 PETTICOAT CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-033-000 3063 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-034-000 3059 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-035-000 3055 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-036-000 3051 SIDEWINDER LP ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-039-000 759 BANDERA DR ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-040-000 763 BANDERA DR ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-041-000 3014 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-042-000 3010 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-043-000 3006 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-045-000 2998 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-046-000 2994 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
79 EXHIBIT A
497-090-047-000 2990 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-048-000 2986 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-049-000 2983 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-050-000 2987 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-051-000 2991 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-052-000 2995 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-053-000 2999 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-054-000 3003 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-055-000 3007 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
497-090-057-000 3015 GALLOP CT ROCKLIN CA 95677
80 EXHIBIT A
010-010-002-000
010-010-004-000
010-010-015-000
010-010-016-000
010-010-017-000
010-010-028-000
010-010-029-000
010-010-048-000
010-023-002-000
010-024-002-000
010-026-001-000
010-030-006-000
010-040-025-000
010-040-040-000
010-072-009-000
010-091-023-000
010-091-024-000
010-091-025-000
010-122-010-000
010-122-012-000
010-131-006-000
010-132-013-000
010-144-010-000
010-162-001-000
010-162-002-000
010-162-003-000
010-162-004-000
010-162-005-000
010-181-053-000
010-181-055-000
010-191-007-000
010-191-010-000
010-191-026-000
010-191-051-000
010-191-052-000
010-191-053-000
010-191-054-000
010-191-055-000
010-191-056-000
010-191-057-000
010-191-066-000
010-203-001-000
010-204-015-000
010-210-021-000
010-210-022-000
010-260-044-000
010-470-003-000
010-470-008-000
010-470-023-000
010-470-024-000
016-130-012-000
016-210-011-000
016-220-004-000
016-220-005-000
016-220-006-000
016-230-001-000
016-230-002-000
016-230-003-000
016-230-011-000
016-230-012-000
016-230-013-000
016-240-044-000
016-240-046-000
016-240-047-000
016-351-018-000
017-084-007-000
017-087-004-000
017-087-005-000
017-087-007-000
017-087-011-000
017-087-012-000
017-171-045-000
017-171-046-000
017-190-045-000
017-276-001-000
017-276-004-000
017-276-005-000
017-276-006-000
017-276-009-000
017-276-010-000
017-276-011-000
017-277-003-000
017-281-008-000
017-281-016-000
017-281-025-000
017-283-010-000
017-283-048-000
017-284-004-000
017-284-015-000
017-284-022-000
030-020-023-000
030-030-052-000
030-030-084-000
030-030-085-000
030-070-025-000
030-070-026-000
030-140-003-000
030-140-024-000
030-330-001-000
030-330-002-000
030-330-003-000
030-330-004-000
030-330-005-000
030-330-006-000
030-330-007-000
030-330-008-000
030-330-009-000
030-330-010-000
030-330-011-000
030-330-012-000
030-330-013-000
030-330-014-000
030-330-015-000
030-330-016-000
030-330-017-000
030-330-018-000
030-330-019-000
030-330-020-000
030-330-021-000
030-330-022-000
030-330-023-000
030-330-024-000
030-330-025-000
030-330-026-000
030-330-027-000
030-330-028-000
030-330-029-000
030-330-030-000
030-330-031-000
030-330-032-000
030-330-033-000
030-330-034-000
030-330-035-000
030-330-036-000
030-330-037-000
030-330-038-000
030-330-039-000
030-330-040-000
030-330-041-000
030-330-042-000
030-330-043-000
030-330-044-000
030-330-045-000
030-330-046-000
030-330-047-000
030-330-048-000
030-330-049-000
030-330-050-000
030-330-051-000
030-330-052-000
81 EXHIBIT A
030-330-053-000
030-330-054-000
032-060-080-000
032-060-082-000
032-070-010-000
032-070-078-000
032-070-080-000
032-360-001-000
032-360-002-000
032-360-003-000
032-360-004-000
032-360-005-000
032-360-006-000
032-360-007-000
032-360-008-000
032-360-009-000
032-360-010-000
032-360-011-000
032-360-012-000
032-360-013-000
032-360-014-000
032-360-015-000
032-360-016-000
032-360-017-000
032-360-018-000
032-360-019-000
032-360-020-000
032-360-021-000
032-360-022-000
032-360-023-000
032-360-024-000
032-360-025-000
032-360-026-000
032-360-027-000
032-360-028-000
032-360-029-000
032-360-030-000
032-360-031-000
032-360-032-000
032-360-033-000
032-360-034-000
032-360-035-000
032-360-036-000
032-360-037-000
032-360-038-000
032-360-039-000
032-360-040-000
032-360-041-000
032-360-042-000
032-360-043-000
032-360-044-000
032-360-045-000
032-360-046-000
032-360-047-000
032-360-048-000
032-360-049-000
032-360-050-000
032-360-051-000
032-360-052-000
032-360-053-000
032-360-054-000
032-360-055-000
032-360-056-000
032-360-057-000
032-360-058-000
032-360-059-000
032-360-060-000
032-360-061-000
032-360-062-000
032-360-063-000
032-360-064-000
032-360-065-000
032-360-066-000
032-370-001-000
032-370-002-000
032-370-003-000
032-370-004-000
032-370-005-000
032-370-006-000
032-370-007-000
032-370-008-000
032-370-009-000
032-370-010-000
032-370-011-000
032-370-012-000
032-370-013-000
032-370-014-000
032-370-015-000
032-370-016-000
032-370-017-000
032-370-018-000
032-370-019-000
032-370-020-000
032-370-021-000
032-370-022-000
045-011-012-000
045-011-013-000
045-011-017-000
045-011-018-000
045-013-005-000
045-013-022-000
045-013-023-000
045-013-024-000
045-021-045-000
045-041-014-000
045-041-016-000
045-041-018-000
045-041-019-000
045-041-025-000
045-041-043-000
045-041-044-000
045-041-045-000
045-041-048-000
045-041-049-000
045-042-075-000
045-042-076-000
045-042-077-000
045-052-039-000
045-053-064-000
045-053-085-000
045-090-061-000
045-090-062-000
045-101-059-000
045-110-034-000
045-110-055-000
045-110-063-000
045-110-064-000
045-110-065-000
045-120-050-000
045-120-068-000
045-120-069-000
045-120-071-000
045-120-072-000
045-131-013-000
045-131-015-000
045-132-001-000
045-132-022-000
045-150-067-000
045-150-070-000
045-161-007-000
045-390-019-000
045-390-020-000
045-450-027-000
045-590-043-000
045-620-008-000
045-620-009-000
045-620-010-000
045-620-011-000
045-620-012-000
045-620-013-000
82 EXHIBIT A
045-620-014-000
045-620-015-000
045-620-016-000
045-620-017-000
045-620-018-000
045-620-019-000
045-620-020-000
045-620-021-000
045-620-022-000
045-620-023-000
045-620-024-000
045-620-025-000
045-620-026-000
045-620-027-000
045-620-028-000
045-620-029-000
045-620-030-000
045-620-031-000
045-620-032-000
045-620-033-000
045-620-034-000
045-620-035-000
045-620-036-000
045-620-037-000
045-620-038-000
045-620-039-000
045-620-040-000
045-620-041-000
045-620-042-000
045-620-043-000
045-620-044-000
045-620-045-000
045-620-046-000
045-620-047-000
045-620-048-000
045-620-049-000
045-620-050-000
045-620-051-000
045-620-052-000
045-620-053-000
045-620-054-000
045-620-055-000
045-620-056-000
045-620-057-000
045-620-058-000
045-620-059-000
045-620-060-000
045-620-061-000
045-620-062-000
045-620-063-000
045-620-064-000
045-620-065-000
045-620-066-000
045-620-067-000
045-620-068-000
045-620-069-000
045-620-070-000
045-620-071-000
045-620-072-000
045-620-073-000
045-620-074-000
045-620-075-000
045-620-076-000
045-620-077-000
045-620-080-000
045-620-081-000
045-620-082-000
045-620-083-000
045-620-084-000
045-620-085-000
045-620-087-000
045-620-088-000
045-620-090-000
045-620-091-000
045-620-092-000
045-620-093-000
046-010-006-000
046-010-007-000
046-010-069-000
046-020-070-000
046-020-071-000
046-020-072-000
046-030-070-000
046-640-047-000
370-120-023-000
371-040-024-000
373-030-060-000
373-030-062-000
453-020-021-000
453-090-030-000
454-050-030-000
454-070-049-000
454-070-050-000
454-070-051-000
454-070-052-000
454-070-054-000
491-010-002-000
491-010-003-000
491-010-004-000
491-010-005-000
491-010-006-000
491-010-007-000
491-010-008-000
491-010-009-000
491-010-010-000
491-010-013-000
491-010-015-000
491-040-094-000

83 City of Rocklin Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT INFORMATION
ABOUT THE CITY OF ROCKLIN’S WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM

Dear Parcel Owner,

Records on file with the Placer County Assessor's Office indicate that you are the owner of vacant property located in the City of Rocklin. This certified letter is to inform you that on April 14th, 2026, the Rocklin City Council declared all vacant parcels in the City of Rocklin a public nuisance and ordered the nuisance to be abated by June 1st, 2026. The City’s “Annual Weed Abatement Program for Maintaining Vacant Parcels” requires the reduction of any fire hazard and/or public nuisance in the City. As part of this program, each property owner is required to take appropriate action to maintain their property throughout the year in accordance with the enclosed Vegetation Maintenance Standards.

THE CITY DOES NOT OFFER THE OPTION TO HAVE A CONTRACTOR MAINTAIN PRIVATE VACANT PARCELS FOR YOU. IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPLY WITH THE VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STANDARDS.

To ensure fire hazards and/or a public nuisance does not exist on vacant parcels, the City’s inspector will be inspecting parcels between May 15th and June 1st. If the City’s inspector during that 2-week period deems parcels non-compliant or partially compliant with the Vegetation Maintenance Standards, the City has the right to abate the public nuisance beginning June 1st.

All costs incurred from performing this work, including direct costs and expenses, any applicable fines, and administrative charges and postage, will be charged to the property owner. In the event that parcels are found to be non-compliant more than once in the same calendar year, no further abatement proceedings are required and the City may proceed directly to abate the public nuisance and collect all associated costs. If such costs are not paid as required, those unpaid costs will constitute a lien and will be recorded against the property until paid. (See Gov.

Code §§39560-39588; RMC Chapter 8.12 Weeds and Rubbish.)

If you have completed the required abatement and your property currently meets the enclosed Standards, please be advised any re-growth throughout the season must also be abated and maintained at a maximum of 4” inches in height.

The enclosed NOTICE TO DESTROY WEEDS AND REMOVE
RUBBISH sets forth your opportunity to object to the City Council’s declaration that your property is a public nuisance at a meeting of the Rocklin City Council on April 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.

Pursuant to Government Code section 39570, the decision of the City Council regarding any protest is final.

84 If you have questions or need any additional information, please contact us at (916) 625-5500.

Sincerely,
Rick Lawrence Ryan Brayton Public Works Manager/Project Manager Deputy Chief-Fire Marshall 85 Notice is hereby given that on the 14th day of April, 2026, the City Council of the City of Rocklin passed a resolution declaring that noxious or dangerous weeds were growing upon the property, and that rubbish, refuse, and dirt were upon the property, in the City of Rocklin, as is more particularly described in the resolution, and that they constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the removal of the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt. Otherwise, they will be removed and the nuisance abated by the City and the costs of removal assessed upon the land from which the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt are removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the weeds, rubbish, refuse, and dirt are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin to be held on April 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., when their objections will be heard and given due consideration.

Written protests may also be sent in writing to the City Clerk on or prior to April 28, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. Protests must be mailed to: The City of Rocklin, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, CA, Attention: City Clerk; or emailed to [email protected] with “Weed Abatement Protest” in the email subject line. Written protests will be read aloud by the City Clerk and given due consideration at the April 28, 2026, City Council meeting. Pursuant to Government Code section 39570, the decision of the City Council regarding any protest is final.

Dated this 14th day of April, 2026.

City Clerk
City of Rocklin

86 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE STANDARD

Scope:

This guideline provides the requirements for open space land and all parcels within the City of Rocklin to reduce the impact of wildland fire. For the purpose of this guideline, certain terms are defined as follows:

Definitions:

Defensible Space. Defensible space is the buffer you create on your property between a structure and/or property line and the grass, trees, shrubs, or any wildland area that surround it. This space is needed to slow or stop the spread of wildfire and it helps protect your home from catching fire—either from embers, direct flame contact or radiant heat.

Wildland Urban Interface. The WUI is the zone of transition between unoccupied land and human development. It is the line, area or zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels.

References:

Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 8.10 - Fire Safe Vegetation and Debris Management
Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 8.12 - Weeds and Rubbish

Operational Standards for ALL Parcels:

Zone 1 (Within 30 feet of the property line or structures):
 Cut, mow, graze annual grass down to a maximum height of 4 inches.  Create horizontal space between shrubs and trees. (See diagram)  Create vertical space between grass, shrubs and trees. (See diagram)  Remove branches that hang over property line.
 Trim trees regularly to keep branches a minimum of 10 feet from other trees.  Create a separation between trees, shrubs.

Zone 2 (Extends from 30 feet to 100 feet from structures):
 Cut, mow, graze annual grass down to a maximum height of 4 inches.  Create horizontal space between shrubs and trees. (See diagram)  Create vertical space between grass, shrubs and trees. (See diagram)

87 Operational Standards for VACANT Parcels:
 The required maintenance for vacant properties is based on the size of the parcels as listed below.

A. Five (5) acres or smaller shall be totally disced or mowed B. Larger than five (5) acres and smaller than twenty-five (25) acres require fire breaks consistent with Zone 1, or one hundred (100) feet off closest structure, whichever is greater. The remainder of the parcel will require the appropriate number of thirty (30) foot fire breaks to segment (checkerboard) the land into four (4) acre +/ - sections.

C. Larger than twenty-five (25) acres require fire breaks of thirty (30) feet off property line or one hundred (100) feet off closest structure, whichever is greater. The remainder of the parcel will require the appropriate number of thirty (30) foot firebreaks to segment (checkerboard) the land into five (5) acre + /- sections.

EXCEPTION: An approved fire access road plan may be substituted in lieu of five (5) acre segments.
 Parcels under agricultural or pasture land use require fire breaks of (30) feet adjacent to all developed areas, fences, or structures. The remainder of the property must be mowed or disced at time of harvest or have sufficient animals present to maintain height of combustible growth of six (6) inches.  Fire breaks may be constructed by discing, mowing, or the use of a blade.  The maximum height of combustible growth within a firebreak is four (4) inches.  If a blade is used, the side boundaries of the break shall be leveled. Windrows are not permitted.
 Parcels may be maintained to allow reasonable access for firefighting operations.  Rubbish and/or debris must be removed prior to any work on the property.

Discing - Discing shall include rototilling or cultivating.  Discs shall be set at an angle sufficient to cut and bury the growth existing at the time.

Mowing - If this is used, the mowing shall be done each time the combustible growth exceeds four (4) inches.

88 89

FILL OUT AND RETURN ONLY IF YOU NO LONGER OWN PARCEL(S)

Name__________________________________________________________ Previous Owner/Business

APN(s)_______________________________________________________________________ List

CHECK THE BOX, SIGN, AND RETURN ONLY IF PROPERTY HAS BEEN SOLD

I no longer own this property.

THE PROPERTY WAS SOLD ON:

_____________________________ to: ________________________________ Month Day Year Buyer's Name (please print) ________________________________
Buyer's Address
________________________________
Buyer’s (Area Code) Phone Number

Previous Owner Information Please Return This Form To

_______________________________ U.S Mail:

Name (please print) City of Rocklin Public Works Department
______________________________ 4081 Alvis Court Signature Rocklin, CA 95677

_____________________________ Fax (916) 625-5501 Your Address E-Mail to: [email protected]

______________________
Phone Number

_______________________
E-mail
90 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

City of Rocklin and Placer County Public Services Cooperation Agreement
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Aly Zimmermann, City Manager
Department:

City Manager's Office
Recommendation:

Background:

The County of Placer estimates that the County as a whole will grow between 47,000 and 84,000 new residents between 2025 and 2050, and a majority of this growth is expected to occur in the western portion of the County. To plan for this growth, Placer County has located county-wide resident services in west Placer County, primarily within the boundary of the City of Rocklin.

The County operates county-wide services at 1000 Sunset Blvd. These services include Health and Human Services, Child Support, the Business Resource Center, and Probation. In 2023, the County opened Clerk-Recorder-Elections operations at 3715 Atherton Road. In 2024 and 2025, the County acquired two buildings at 5700 and 5750 West Oaks Blvd. These buildings are currently planned to house the West Placer Sheriff Station and a variety of resident-facing operations including Assessor and Development services.

The City has communicated to the County that the acquisition of four commercial properties in the City of Rocklin by the County creates potential revenue challenges for the City that could have been offset by commercial activities.

The County and the City have engaged in cooperative conversations to discuss these impacts and develop a mutually agreeable solution to mitigate the impacts. The City and the County wish to enter into an agreement to memorialize their understanding and agreement on the matters presented. The City and County have agreed to offset impacts created by locating County staff, as well as resident traffic to access these services at these properties, with a one-time in-lieu fee payment of $500,000 paid to the City by the County. In addition, the County proposes to offset impacts on City revenues in an annual amount of $400,000 for an Item Number C7.

91 initial term of ten (10) years.

Upon mutual agreement by the Placer County Board of Supervisors and the Rocklin City Council, this impact offset payment may be renewed for two (2) additional five-years terms.

The impact offset payment may be renegotiated during the initial term, subject to approval by the Placer County Board of Supervisors and the Rocklin City Council. The obligation to renegotiate shall be required if the County divests any of the four properties. Otherwise, the Parties can request renegotiation before the end of the initial term.

Fiscal Impact:

In the current fiscal year, the City will realize $500,000 to the General Fund as a result of the mutual execution of this agreement. Subsequent fiscal years include General Fund revenue of $400,000 annually, unless modified by mutual agreement. Such funds will be included in future operating budgets. The total revenue commitment over ten years is $4.5 million.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Resolution Exhibit A - Agreement
92 Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 1
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE A PUBLIC SERVICES COOPERATION AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF PLACER AND THE CITY OF

ROCKLIN RELATED TO THE USE OF COUNTY-OWNED

PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

WHEREAS, the County of Placer (County) owns certain real property located within the City of Rocklin (City) commonly known as 5700 West Oaks Boulevard; 5750 West Oaks Boulevard; 1000 Sunset Boulevard; and 3715 Atherton Road (collectively, the County Properties); and

WHEREAS, as more fully set forth in the Recitals and terms and conditions in the “Public Services Cooperation Agreement By and B etween the County of Placer and the City of Rocklin” (Agreement), attached hereto as Exhibit A, the City and County recognize the mutual benefit, economic impacts, and effect on revenue to the City related to the uses and tax-exempt status of the County Properties; and

WHEREAS, the City and County desire to enter into an agreement in order to, among other things, address financial impacts on the City and support ongoing delivery of public services by City to the County Properties.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rocklin as follows:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rocklin finds that the Recitals set forth herein are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Rocklin approves the “Public Services Cooperation Agreement By and Between the County of Placer and the City of Rocklin” and hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute said Agreement in substantially the form attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

Mayor
ATTEST:

Avinta Singh, City Clerk
93 Public Services Cooperation Agreement
By and Between the County of Placer and the City of Rocklin

This Public Services Cooperation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this___ day of _____________ , 2026, by and among the County of Placer, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) and the City of Rocklin, a municipal corporation of the State of California ("City"). The parties may collectively be referred to herein as the “Parties,” and individually as a “Party.” This Agreement is made by the Parties with reference to the following Recitals:

A. County is the owner of certain real property in the City of Rocklin as more fully described on attached Exhibit A (“County Properties”); and B. The County provides public services, including elected official constituent services, services of the Placer County Sheriff’s Office, Elections, Veterans Services, and Health and Human Services functions, from and at the County Properties, and such services benefit residents of the City and other areas the County; and C. As a public entity, the County is exempt from real and personal property taxation on the County Properties; and
D. The City has asserted certain impacts associated with the County Properties, including a loss of tax revenue and impacts on City roadways and other City public services; and
E. The Parties recognize the mutual benefit of the County occupying and providing public services from the County Properties and the positive economic impacts, including generation of sales tax revenue, associated with the presence of County employees, visitors, and others using the County Properties; and
F. The Parties recognize that the County’s tax-exempt status results in certain reduced revenue to the City compared to occupancy by a non-exempt entity, and, further, that, as existing entitled land uses, the County Buildings did not require payment of traffic impact and other potential development impact fees from the County to the City once the County assumed ownership; and
G. The Parties have agreed to certain one-time and recurring payments from the County to the City to address financial impacts on the City, and to support the City’s ongoing delivery of public services to the County Properties; and H. The Parties wish to enter into an agreement to memorialize their understanding and agreement on the matters above and other matters addressed herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree that the Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference and in consideration of the promises and commitments contained in this Agreement, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

Section 1. County Payment of In-Lieu Traffic Fee. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Agreement, County shall pay to City $500,000 (Five Hundred 94 Thousand Dollars) as a one-time, complete, and final payment for in-lieu traffic mitigation fees associated with the County’s use and ownership of the County Properties (“In-Lieu Traffic Fee Payment”). In the County making and the City receiving the In-Lieu Traffic Fee Payment, the Parties agree and acknowledge that the City cannot require the County to pay the City’s Traffic Fee (also referred to by the City as “Traffic Impact Fee” and “Traffic Circulation Impact Fee”) or any other development impact fee and that the County is making the In-Lieu Traffic Fee Payment in the interests of cooperation with the City as provided for in this Agreement. The Parties agree that City may, and City does agree to use the In-Lieu Traffic Fee Payment for any lawful purposes applicable to the use of public funds generally. Accordingly, the City may in its discretion, use such Payment for any and all purposes for which the City established and collects its Traffic Fee as more fully described in that certain “Annual Compliance Report for AB 1600 Traffic Circulation Impact Fee Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025” adopted by the Rocklin City Council on November 18, 2025, or any other lawful use or purpose applicable generally to the use of public funds.

Section 2. County Payments to Offset Impacts on City Revenues. (a) On or before December 31, 2026, and annually thereafter on or before December 31, County shall pay to City $400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars) per year, which payments are intended to partially offset impacts on City revenues associated with the County’s ownership and use of the County Properties as a tax-exempt public entity (“Annual Offset Payment”). The Parties agree that the Annual Offset Payment shall not be subject to any inflationary or other increase or decrease, except as described in subsection 2.B. The Annual Offset Payment will be paid to the City, by the County for an initial term of 10 (ten) years. The Parties agree that upon approval by the Parties’ governing bodies, this Agreement may be extended for two additional 5 (five) year terms.
(b) The Parties further agree that they shall renegotiate the Annual Offset Payment amount not later than the earlier of December 31, 2035 or the date of sale or conveyance, if any, of fee title by County to a third party of any of the County Properties.

The County understands and agrees that notwithstanding the obligation to renegotiate said Payment amount, County shall remain obligated to, and shall timely pay the $400,000 (Four Hundred Thousand Dollars) Annual Offset Payment through 2035, unless and until a new Annual Offset Payment amount is mutually agreed upon by the Parties. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “sale or conveyance of fee title” shall refer to the first date on which County takes official action to either authorize the making of an offer to sell or convey one hundred percent of the County’s real property interest in the subject County Property or Properties to a third party, or the first date on which County takes official action to accept an offer from a buyer for the sale and conveyance of one hundred percent of the County’s interest in the subject County Property or Properties to a third party, whichever occurs first.

Section 3. City Commitments and Obligations. In consideration of the payments identified herein, the Parties agree as follows:
(a) City agrees and acknowledges that this Agreement is intended to respond to and satisfy all concerns raised by the City regarding traffic, impacts on public services, 95 revenue loss, and any and all related matters associated with the County’s ownership and use of the County Properties. City agrees it will not intentionally or unreasonably restrict or refuse to cooperate with the County’s implementation of the County’s planned uses at the County Properties, including, without limitation, County use of any easement(s) or other property interest on or around any of the County Properties in which the City may have an interest.
(b) During the period of County ownership, City agrees to, 1) provide primary fire and emergency services to the County Properties; and 2) provide mutual aid and similar law enforcement services to the County Properties.
(c) City hereby provides its consent to the applicability of County building and land use codes and regulations to the development, construction, and use of the County Buildings during the term of County ownership. The Parties agree that the County has sole discretion to construct improvements at the County Properties and that City has no building or zoning permitting authority over the County Properties during the term of County ownership, consistent with State law. County agrees to notify City of any external facing improvements at the County Properties a minimum of 15 calendar days before the earlier of the date said improvements are undertaken or before an action of the Board of Supervisors to approve said improvements, if such action is required or is to occur.

Section 4. General Provisions.
(a) No Waivers. A waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute or operate as a waiver of any other breach of such provision or of any other provisions, nor shall any failure to enforce any provision operate as a waiver of such provision or of any other provisions.

(b) No Third Party Beneficiary. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the Parties and their successors and assigns. This Agreement is not intended to, and shall not be construed to, create any right on the part of any third party
to bring any action or otherwise enforce any of its terms.

(c) Notice. All notices and payments required by this Agreement shall be deemed to have been made when hand delivered or mailed at the respective addresses as set forth below or such other addresses as the Parties may provide in writing to the other Party from time to time:

To the County:

County of Placer
County Executive Office
175 Fulweiler Avenue
Auburn, CA 95603
Attention: County Executive Officer

With a copy to:
96 County of Placer
Office of County Counsel
175 Fulweiler Avenue
Auburn, CA 95603
Attention: County Counsel

To the City:

City of Rocklin
3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
Attention: City Manager

With a copy to:

City of Rocklin
City Attorney’s Office
3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
Attention: City Attorney

(d) Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by mutual and written agreement of the Parties.

(e) Severability. Notwithstanding any provision of applicable law to the contrary, if any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws, such provision shall be fully severable, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such void, illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision had never comprised a part of this Agreement, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the void, illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision or by its severance from this Agreement.

(f) Headings and Captions. Headings and captions on sections and subsections are provided for the convenience of the Parties only and shall not be considered in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement, nor limit, amend or affect the meaning of the provision to which they pertain.

(g) No Joint Venture or Partnership. This Agreement does not create any form of joint venture, partnership or other association between the County and the City, and the Parties agree that nothing in this Agreement or in any document executed in connection with it shall be construed as creating any such relationship.

(h) Termination. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the final Annual Offset Payment is made in 2035, unless the governing bodies of the Parties jointly exercise an extension of this Agreement as provided in subsection 2.A. The City’s Commitments and Obligations shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

97 (i) Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of the last party’s signature (“Effective Date”).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.

County of Placer

By: __________________________
Print Name: _______________________
Its: ______________________________
Date: ____________________________

Approved as to Form

_______________________
County Counsel

City of Rocklin

By: __________________________
Print Name: _______________________
Its: ______________________________
Date: ____________________________

Approved as to Form

_______________________
City Attorney

Attachment(s):

Exhibit A - County Properties in City of Rocklin

98 Exhibit A - County Properties in City of Rocklin

Property

5700 West Oaks Blvd., Rocklin, CA 95765
5750 West Oaks Blvd., Rocklin, CA 95765
1000 Sunset Blvd., Rocklin, CA 95765
3715 Atherton Road, Rocklin, CA 95765
99 City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing and Approval of the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Benefit of Rocklin WJU 719, L.P.

Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Megan Bressem, Management Analyst
Daniel Choe, Administrative Services Deputy Director
Department:

Administrative Services - Finance
Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Background:

California Municipal Financing Authority (CMFA)
State law provides the ability for cities and counties to join together under cooperative agreements to form joint powers authorities to issue tax-exempt and/or taxable debt obligations to fund projects that provide a municipal benefit and serve the needs of residents within the jurisdictions of the participating members. Federal law allows these obligations to be issued on a tax-exempt basis under certain circumstances. Cities and counties in California have the ability to act as issuers of conduit bonds and other obligations, but many jurisdictions utilize joint powers authorities such as CMFA, primarily for economies of scale and to access specialized transaction knowledge and resources.

The CMFA was created on January 1, 2004 pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural and community development, through the financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California. To date, over 350 municipalities have become members of CMFA. The City of Rocklin became a member of CMFA on December 21, 2017 (Resolution No. 2017-278).

Rocklin WJU 719, L.P (Borrower)
The Borrower will be Rocklin WJU 719, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership being a general partner of USA Properties Fund, Inc. or an affiliate for the purpose of owning the project. On behalf of the Borrower, USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the “Sponsor”), Item Number PH1.

100
has requested that CMFA undertake a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of one or more series of exempt facility bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $115,000,000 (the “Bonds”).

The Bonds are to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 324-unit (including three manager's units) qualified multifamily residential rental housing project (the “Project”). The Project is a qualified residential rental project under Section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, meeting Federal requirements for affordable rental housing with a portion of the units reserved for low- or very low-income households. The Project is to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located west of University Avenue, east of Highway 65, north of Sunset Boulevard and south of Larkspur Drive, on an approximately 12.72-acre site, in the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”). The Project was entitled by the City on January 14, 2025, known as "The Frances Apartments" (formerly University Avenue Apartments).

The financing for the Project involves the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and may be completed through CMFA if the City approves the financing. The purpose of this TEFRA hearing is to receive public comment and request approval of the financing, as required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Bond Counsel in this transaction, Anzel Galvan LLP, has coordinated with the City Clerk to properly notice this public hearing and has assisted in the preparation of the resolution (Attachment 1) for approval.

The Bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the Bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the Bonds are not obligations of the City or the State of California, but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower.

The issuance of the exempt facility bonds as tax-exempt will reduce financing costs and debt service costs for the Borrower. In order to satisfy the requirements for the bonds to be issued as tax-exempt, an applicable elected representative which is also a member of CMFA is required to conduct the TEFRA hearing and approve the issuance of the tax-exempt bonds in accordance with Section147(f) of the Code. The City Council of the City of Rocklin constitutes an applicable elected representative under Section 147(f) of the Code.

The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution that would approve the issuance of tax- exempt and taxable exempt facility bonds by the CMFA, in one or more series, in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $115,000,000 (the “Bonds”) to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 324-unit (including three manager's units) qualified multifamily residential rental facility project, to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located on an approximately 12.72-acre site within the City of Rocklin, California.

With respect to the issuance of the Bonds, outside of holding the TEFRA public hearing and adopting the required resolution, no other participation or activity of the City or the City Council will be required.

101
Environmental Analysis:

The approval of the Exempt Facility Bonds to finance and refinance the Project is not subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code, Section 21100, et seq.).

Fiscal Impact:

The City has no responsibility for the tax-exempt status or the interest on the Exempt Facility Bonds, the debt service on the Exempt Facility Bonds or any other matter related to the Exempt Facility Bonds.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. TEFRA Public Hearing Notice
102
Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING A PLAN OF FINANCE INCLUDING THE ISSUANCE OF

EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL

FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AGGREGATE OUTSTANDING
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $115,000,000 TO FINANCE

AND REFINANCE A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT
FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROCKLIN WJU 719, L.P. (OR AN AFFILIATE),

AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO

WHEREAS, USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the “Sponsor”), on behalf of Rocklin WJU 719, L.P. , a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership of which the Sponsor or a related person to the Sponsor is the general partner (such limited partnership or other ownership entity being referred to herein as the “Borrower”) , has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) undertake a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of one or more series of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 115,000,000 (the “Bonds”) to finance and refinance the acquisition, development, construction and equipping of a 324- unit (including three manager’s units) multifamily rental housing project (the “Project”), to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located west of University Avenue, east of Highway 65, north of Sunset Boulevard and south of Larkspur Drive within the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”), and;
WHEREAS, an “applicable elected representative” of the jurisdiction in which the Project is to be located is required to approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rocklin, California (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is an “applicable elected representative” for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as o f January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and no w desires to approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rocklin, as follows:
103
Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 2 of 2
1 Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the proposed plan of finance for the Project that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of the Bonds in an outstanding principal amount not to exceed $115,000,000. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitutes approval of the proposed plan of finance for the Project for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement.

Section 3. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby.

Section 4 . The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing for the Project; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, development or equipping of the Project; or (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Authority in care of its counsel:

Ronald E. Lee, Esq.

Jones Hall LLP
4 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 406
San Mateo, CA 94402
Section 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

104

Page 1 ends

Reso. No. 2026-

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK

I, Avinta Singh, City Clerk of the City of Rocklin, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin duly and regularly held in Rocklin, California, on April 14, 2026, of which meeting all of the members of said Board had due notice.

I further certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing copy with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office; that said copy is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and that said resolution has not been amended, modified, rescinded or revoked in any manner since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate and affixed the seal of the City of Rocklin hereto this 14th day of April, 2026.

____________________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

105
131226

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF ROCKLIN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:00 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter can be heard, on TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026, at City of Rocklin City Council Chambers, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin California 95677, the City Council of the City of Rocklin (the “City Council”) will conduct a public hearing (the “Public Hearing”) as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), with respect to a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time, by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), of one or more series of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project in an outstanding principal amount not to exceed $115,000,000 (the “Bonds”), to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 324-unit (including three manager’s units) multifamily rental housing project located west of University Avenue, east of Highway 65, north of Sunset Boulevard and south of Larkspur Drive, on an approximately

12.72-acre site (the “Project”), in the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”). The Project is owned and operated by Rocklin WJU 719, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership of which USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the “Sponsor”), or a related person to the Sponsor is the general partner (such limited partnership, the “Borrower”).

The Bonds and the obligation to pay principal thereof and interest thereon and any redemption premium with respect thereto do not constitute indebtedness or an obligation of the City, the Authority, the State of California or any political subdivision thereof, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation, or a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of any of them. The Bonds shall be limited obligations of the Authority, payable solely from certain revenues duly pledged therefor and generally representing amounts paid by the Borrower. The Public Hearing is intended to comply with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code.

Interested persons wishing to express their views on the proposed plan of finance or on the nature and location of the facilities proposed to be financed and refinanced may attend the public hearing or, prior to the hour of 5:00p.m. on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, submit written comments addressed to the City Clerk, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, California 95677, or by email to the City Clerk at [email protected].

Court challenges to any public hearing items may be limited to only those issues which are raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code Section 65009).

The location of the public meeting is fully accessible to mobility impaired individuals. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Rocklin encourages those with disabilities to participate fully in the public hearing process. If you have special needs, including, but not limited to, non-English speaking assistance, in order to allow you to attend or participate in this public hearing process, please contact our office at (916) 625-5560 well in advance of the public hearing or program you wish to attend so that we may make every reasonable effort to accommodate you.

At the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matters may appear and be heard.

Dated and published: April 3, 2026
PUBLISHED IN THE PLACER HERALD: APRIL 3, 2026
106
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Megan Bressem, Management Analyst
Daniel Choe, Administrative Services Deputy Director
Department:

Administrative Services - Finance
Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Plan of Finance including the Issuance of Exempt Facility Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an Aggregate Outstanding Principal Amount Not to Exceed $35,000,000 to Finance and Refinance a Qualified Residential Rental Project for the Benefit of Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P. (or an Affiliate), and Certain Other Matters Relating Thereto.

Background:

Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P. (Borrower)
The Borrower will be Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership being a general partner of USA Properties Fund, Inc. or an affiliate for the purpose of owning the project. On behalf of the Borrower, USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the Item Number PH2.

107
“Sponsor”), has requested that CMFA undertake a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of one or more series of exempt facility bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 (the “Bonds”).

The Bonds are to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 180-unit (including two manager's units) qualified multifamily residential rental housing project (the “Project”). The Project is a qualified residential rental project under Section 142(d)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code, meeting Federal requirements for affordable rental housing with a portion of the units reserved for low- or very low-income households. The Project is to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 4930 Rocklin Road in the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”). The Project was entitled by the City on December 6, 2022, known as "The Steven Apartments" (formerly Sierra College Senior Apartments).

The City Council is being asked to adopt a resolution that would approve the issuance of tax- exempt and taxable exempt facility bonds by the CMFA, in one or more series, in a maximum aggregate principal amount of $35,000,000 (the “Bonds”) to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 180-unit (including two manager's units) qualified multifamily residential rental facility project, to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 4930 Rocklin Road within the City of Rocklin, California.

Environmental Analysis:

108
Fiscal Impact:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. TEFRA Public Hearing Notice
109
Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 1 of 2
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN

APPROVING A PLAN OF FINANCE INCLUDING THE ISSUANCE OF

EXEMPT FACILITY BONDS BY THE CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL

FINANCE AUTHORITY IN AN AGGREGATE OUTSTANDING
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $35,000,000 TO FINANCE AND

REFINANCE A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT FOR THE BENEFIT OF ROCKLIN SIERRA 703, L.P. (OR AN AFFILIATE),

AND CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO

WHEREAS, USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the “Sponsor”), on behalf of Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P. , a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership of which the Sponsor or a related person to the Sponsor is the general partner (such limited partnership or other ownership entity being referred to herein as the “Borrower”) , has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”) undertake a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of one or more series of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 35,000,000 (the “Bonds”) to finance and refinance the acquisition, development, construction and equipping of a 180- unit (including two manager’s units) multifamily rental housing project (the “Project”), to be owned and operated by the Borrower and located at 4930 Rocklin Road within the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”), and;
WHEREAS, an “applicable elected representative” of the jurisdiction in which the Project is to be located is required to approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project under Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rocklin, California (the “City Council”) is the elected legislative body of the City and is an “applicable elected representative” for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Cod e and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and now desires to approve the proposed plan of finance for the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rocklin, as follows:
110
Resolution No. 2026- April 14, 2026 Page 2 of 2
1 Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the proposed plan of finance for the Project that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time of the Bonds in an outstanding principal amount not to exceed $ 35,000,000. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitutes approval of the proposed plan of finance for the Project for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement.

Section 5. The City Clerk shall forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Authority in care of its counsel:

Ronald E. Lee, Esq.

Jones Hall LLP
4 West Fourth Avenue, Suite 406
San Mateo, CA 94402
Section 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________
David Bass, Mayor

ATTEST:

__________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

111

Page 1 ends

Reso. No. 2026-

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate and affixed the seal of the City of Rocklin hereto this 14th day of April, 2026.

____________________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk

112
130842

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF ROCKLIN
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:00 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter can be heard, on TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2026, at City of Rocklin City Council Chambers, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin California 95677, the City Council of the City of Rocklin (the “City Council”) will conduct a public hearing (the “Public Hearing”) as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), with respect to a proposed plan of finance that includes the issuance and reissuance from time to time, by the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), of one or more series of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project in an outstanding principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 (the “Bonds”), to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, development and equipping of a 180-unit (including two manager’s units) multifamily rental housing project located at 4930 Rocklin Road, on an approximately 7.3-acre site (the “Project”), in the City of Rocklin, California (the “City”). The Project is to be owned and operated by Rocklin Sierra 703, L.P., a California limited partnership, or another limited partnership of which USA Properties Fund, Inc. (the “Sponsor”), or a related person to the Sponsor is the general partner (such limited partnership, the “Borrower”).

At the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matters may appear and be heard.

Dated and published: March 27, 2026
PUBLISHED IN THE PLACER HERALD: MARCH 27, 2026
113
City Council
Staff Report

Subject:

Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001
Date:

April 14, 2026
Submitted By:

Nathan Anderson, Principal Planner
Arwen Wacht, Planning Manager
David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Director
Department:

Community Development
Recommendation:

Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider the Following Action:

Background:

The staff report is included as Attachment 1 in order to maintain the integrity of the formatting.

Item Number PH3.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Staff Report

2. SR Attachment 1 - Public Comments

3. SR Attachment 2 - Kimley Horn Aguilar Memorandum

4. SR Attachment 3 - Applicant Statement (Modified 4.07.26)

5. Ordinance

6. Ordinance Exhibit A - Development Agreement
114
City Council
Staff Report

________________________________________________________________

Subject: Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement
Development Agreement / DA2024-0001

Date: April 14, 2026

Submitted By: Nathan Anderson, Principal Planner
Arwen Wacht, Planning Manager
David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Director

Department: Community Development
______________________________________________________________________

Recommendation:

As the entitlement request includes a legislative action which requires approval of an ordinance, a two-meeting process is required.

The Planning Commission and staff recommend City Council approval of the following:

April 14, 2026 – First reading of ordinance:

April 28, 2026 – Final action for ordinance:

Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rocklin Approving a Development Agreement by and between the City of Rocklin and Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. and Real Property Investment Pros, Inc., relative to the Granite Lake Estates Subdivision (Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / DA2024-0001).

Application Request/Project Description:

The project requests approval of a Development Agreement (DA) for the remaining phases of the Granite Lakes Estates project, a 116 -lot single-family residential subdivision. The Development Agreement would extend the term of the previously approved Tentative Subdivision Map (SD -2000-02A) and Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit (TRE-2000-33A) for a period of ten (10) years, and would allow construction of the 115
remaining 65 residences to proceed concurrently with construction of the Monument Springs Bridge.

Owner/Applicant:

Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. owns APNs 454 -070-049, -050, -051, -052, and -054.

Real Property Investment Pros, Inc. and Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. own APN 045-030-070.

The applicant is NG Alexander Real Estate Development, LLC. c/o Nick Alexander.

Location:

The Granite Lakes Estates project is generally located in the southern area of the City, at the southerly terminus of Greenbrae Road and Monument Springs Drive. The Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) for the undeveloped portions of the project site are 046-030-070; 454-070-049, -050, -051, -052, and -054.

The originally approved project area al so included APN 454 -070-053, located in the northwest corner of the site. Since approval however, this approximately 12 -acre open space parcel has been dedicated to the City of Rocklin. While the open space parcel still appears on some historic project exhibits, such as the Tentative Subdivision Map, it is no longer part of the project site and is not included in the proposed Development Agreement. See Figures 1 through 4.

116
Figure 1 – Granite Lakes Estates (General Location)

Figure 2 – Granite Lakes Estates (Project Boundaries)

117
Figure 3 – Current Map with Phasing

118
Figure 4 – Granite Lakes Estates Tentative Map

119
Summary of Planning Commission Hearing and Action:

On March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission considered the proposed project, with staff presenting the item, and two representatives of the applicant team, Nick Alexander and Andrew Katakis, providing testimony on behalf of the project. Mr. Alexander stated that concurrent construction of the homes and bridge would be beneficial to the area, as it has the potential to shorten the overall construction timeline. Mr. Katakis indicated that he as the applicant is willing to work with neighboring residents to develop a construction management plan to minimize potential impacts. The applicant team also noted that, under the current Tentative Subdivision Map, they are permitted to proceed with grading, site work, and infrastructure improvements, but are prohibited from constructing homes until the bridge is completed.

The Planning Commission t hen opened the public hearing , and a pproximately 10 members of the public provided comments. In general, commenters did not express opposition to the overall development of the project or approval of the Development Agreement. However, numerous speakers op posed proposed Item 8 of the agreement, which would allow issuance of the remaining building permits upon commencement of bridge foundation construction, with occupancy limited to model homes for business purposes until completion of the bridge. Commenters urged the decisionmakers to maintain the existing Tentative Subdivision Map condition requiring completion and operation of the Monument Springs Drive extension and bridge prior to issuance of additional building permits. Concerns were raised that, if bri dge construction were to be delayed or halted after homes were constructed, the City would have limited ability to prevent future requests for occupancy.

Following public comment, the Commission closed the public hearing and deliberated.

Commissioners ide ntified construction traffic on Aguilar Road as a concern and expressed that allowing home construction prior to completion of the bridge could create additional traffic and access within the area. The Commission also emphasized the importance of the appli cant working collaboratively with nearby residents to minimize construction-related impacts. Commissioners further noted that the project’s history has contributed to a level of public skepticism, and encouraged the applicant to continue efforts to build trust with the surrounding community.

At the conclusion of deliberations, the Planning Commission voted 3–1 (with one member absent) to recommend approval of the Development Agreement, with a modification to remove Item 8, thereby retaining the existing condition requiring completion of the bridge prior to issuance of any additional building permits. The Planning Commissioner who cast the dissenting vote clarified that his position was based on a desire for the City Council to consider alternative approaches to linking home construction with the progress of the bridge, rather than eliminating Item 8 entirely. He indicated that he supports the remaining components of the Development Agreement.

As the Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity, Item 8 has been retained in the version of the Development Agreement presented to the City Council for 120
consideration. The City Council may choose to remove Item 8, retain it as proposed, or modify its provisions at its discretion.

General Plan/Zoning:

The Granite Lakes Estates properties have General Plan designations of Low Density Residential (LDR) and Recreation Conservation (R -C) and are zoned Planned Development Residential 1.5 Dwelling Units per Acre (PD-1.5) and Open Area (OA) within the Granite Lakes Estates General Development Plan (P DG-2000-08), which was originally adopted via Ordinance No. 855 in 2002 and most recently amended in 2010 via Ordinance No. 958.

Background:

Original Approval
The Granite Lake Estates subdivision (SD-2000-02), a 119 -lot single family residential development, was approved by the City Council on May 28, 2002 via Resolution No. 2002-166. The total lot count was later reduced to 116 via a substantial compliance adjustment to the map configuration when a final map for the first phase of the development was recorded. The project entitlements included an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), General Development Plan, Tentative Subdivision Map, Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit, grading Design Guidelines, and a Development Agreement.

Monument Springs Bridge and Extension of Monument Springs Drive Consistent with the requirements of the Southeast Rocklin Circulation Element, adopted in 1993, primary access to the project site was to be via an off-site extension of Monument Springs Drive from its terminus on th e north side of Secret Ravine to Greenbrae Road.

The extension included construction of a developer -funded bridge over the creek and a two-lane road to connect to Greenbrae Road (Figure 5).

At the time, the property for the bridge portion of this off-site improvement was located in an area under the jurisdiction of Placer County. Known as the Greenbrae Area, this island of Placer County-controlled land was annexed into the City of Rocklin in 2016. Based on its original approvals, the Granite Lakes Estates project was allowed to construct up to a maximum of 40 homes in the first phase of development in order to partially offset the cost of off-site improvements.

The extension of Monument Springs Drive and construction of the bridge has been delayed by a nu mber of factors , including ownership changes, minor changes to the proposed road alignment, difficulty acquiring the needed right -of-way, and the downturn in the economy now known as the “Great Recession”. As a result, the project developer at the time, Alleghany Properties, Inc., applied to amend the project’s approvals to allow eight (8) additional homes to be constructed prior to completion of the bridge and roadway extension, for a total of 48 homes. The City Council approved the modification on March 9, 2010 via Ordinance s No. 958 (General Development Plan Amendment) and No. 959 (Development Agreement Amendment).

121

Figure 5 – Extension of Monument Springs Drive and Bridge Location

Homes were completed on all 48 lots in the first phase of project development and construction of the bridge and roadway improvements commenced. Work on the bridge and roadway improvements were later halted, and ultimately the undeveloped portions of the subdivision went into receivership and were not pursued.

The prop erty was later acquired by the current owners, Capitol Equity Management Group, Inc. and Real Property Investment Pros, Inc. Since that time, the property owners have been working with the City and the owners of the similarly conditioned Vista Oaks and Highlands Parcel A projects to identify options to finance and build the Monument Springs bridge and roadway improvements and allow the projects to be completed.

Original Development Agreement and Amendments
The original Development Agreement (DA) for the Granite Lakes Estates project (Ordinance No. 856) allowed for the creation of up to 40 lots , approximately one-third of the project, to be constructed and occupied prior to construction of the Monument Springs Bridge and completion of other offsite roadway improvements.

The DA was amended twice, with the First Amendment, approved by the City Council in 2010 (Ordinance No. 959), increasing the total number of homes that could be built in the 122
Granite Lakes Estates subdivision prior to completion of the bridge and roadway improvements from 40 to 48, as discussed above. The modified DA also extended the life of the project to July 11, 2020.

The City Council approved the Second Amendment to the DA in 2020, to extend the life of the project through July 11, 2021.

The applicant was in negotiations with the City for a Third Amendment to modify the terms of the agreement and extend the term of the project. However, due in part to delays and disruptions associated with the Covid-19 pandemic, agreement was not reached and the DA expired on July 11, 2021. At that time, it was determined that AB 1561, legislation enacting time extensions for tentative s ubdivision maps, was applicable to the project, thereby extending the validity of the Granite Lake Estates tentative subdivision map by eighteen months to January 11, 2023.

Tentative Subdivision Map Extension
In 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-24, which extended the Tentative Subdivision Map and Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit for Granite Lakes Estates for four additional years, to January 11, 2027. If not extended by the proposed DA or some other mechanism, the project is currently set to expire on that date.

In addition to approximately $198,000 which had been previously collected by the City from Highlands Units 2 and 3 for construction of the bridge and roadway extension, the City Council took a significant step toward ensuring delivery of the Monument Springs Bridge on June 28, 2022, by allocating $1.5 million in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement Plan.

During those same meetings in 2022, the City Council also considered applicant-initiated requests to modify the approved General Development Plan for the Granite Lakes Estates subdivision, as well as the conditions of approval for the Granite Lakes Estates and Vista Oaks Tentative Subdivision Maps. The proposed modifications were intended to facilitate construction of the Monument Springs Bridge and roadway extensions by allowing additional homes to be constructed prior to completion of the bridge and road way improvements, in support of formation of a Community Facilities District and issuance of BOLD bonds.

123
Due to community concerns regarding increased traffic on Aguilar Road and uncertainty surrounding the timing of the bridge construction, the City Coun cil did not approve the amendments to allow for the construction of additional homes within the Granite Lakes Estates project prior to completion of the Monument Springs Bridge and roadway improvements. The City Council did however adopt Resolution No. 202 2-127, which amended the Granite Lakes Estates Tentative Subdivision Map and Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit to change some conditions of approval, mainly related to BOLD financing.

As part of that same action, the City Council directed staff to evaluat e the feasibility of advancing City funds to support earlier construction of the bridge and accelerate its delivery.

On November 18, 2022, the Board of Directors of the California Municipal Financing Authority (CMFA) adopted a Resolution of Intent to establish CMFA Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2022-4 (City of Rocklin – Monument Springs), Improvement Area No. 1, as well as to incur bonded indebtedness for the CFD. On March 17, 2023, following a public hearing, the CMFA Board of Directors adopted a resolution approving formation of the CMFA BOLD City of Rocklin – Monument Springs CFD, Improvement Area No. 1 (Vista Oaks), along with the associated future annexation areas.

Following formation of the CMFA BOLD City of Rocklin – Monument Springs CFD, City staff conducted a capacity analysis to estimate the total eligible resources available for potential advancements, the projected bond proceeds available to repay those advancements, and the associated financial risks. The estimated cost to construct t he Monument Springs Bridge is approximately $7.3 million, based on a developer -provided estimate from Summer 2022 and adjusted for inflation. Actual construction costs may vary depending on market conditions, final bid pricing, and other project-specific requirements.

On March 28, 2023, the City Council approved advancing City funds from the Traffic Circulation Impact Fees Fund to support early construction of the bridge, with reimbursement to the City to occur over time through the BOLD CFD . As part of th at action, the City Council directed staff to assume responsibility for the project and deliver the bridge as quickly and efficiently as reasonably possible.

Since that date, bridge design has been steadily progressing, with 90 percent design plans anticipated to be submitted by Dokken in May of this year. Environmental permitting is also underway. The current construction schedule anticipates a spring 2027 construction start date, with an anticipated completion date approximately six months 124
later. If the project continues to proceed as planned, the bridge is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2027.

Proposed Development Agreement:

The proposed DA would extend the term of the previously approved Tentative Subdivision Map and Oak Tree Preservation Permit for an additional ten (10) years, and allow application for and construction of the remaining homes to proceed concurrently when the construction of the Monument Springs Bridge abutments commence.

According to the development team, the requested 10-year term is intended to provide a realistic and responsible entitlement horizon that accounts for potential uncertainties associated with bridge timing, funding coordination, permitting, construction sequencing, and broader economic conditions that could impact project delivery. The development team has stated that a shorter extension would risk requiring additional discretionary approvals before the project can reasonably be completed, repeating a patter n that has occurred previously and creating uncertainty for both the City and the development team.

The DA would allow building permits for the remaining 65 residences to be issued upon commencement of construction of the Monument Springs Bridge foundatio ns and abutments. It would also allow for issuance of up to six (6) model home building permits and temporary certificates of occupancy, with the City Manager authorized to approve up to two (2) additional model home permits, for a maximum total of eight ( 8). No other certificates of occupancy could be approved until the City Council approves the Notice of Completion accepting the public improvements associated with the extension of Monument Springs Drive and completion of the Monument Springs Bridge , thus helping to minimize traffic on other local roadways from the remaining non -model home residences.

The DA would require the project to grant all reasonably necessary rights -of-way and temporary construction easements to the City, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, to facilitate construction of the Monument Springs Bridge. These dedications would include any property interests necessary for bridge construction, access, and related infrastructure improvements (Figure 6).

125
Figure 6 – Monument Springs Drive Modifications Required

In addition, the DA would require the Granite Lakes Estates project to coordinate with the City, as needed, to align the location and design of the on -site trail with the modified Highlands Parcel A/Vista Oaks trail.

The DA would also require the landowner to reasonably cooperate with the City in dedicating an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) and construction easement to allow for a future roadway connection between the southern stub of Monument Springs Drive through the Granite Lakes Estates project area and the eastern terminus of Highlands Parcel A. This dedication would ensure that the Highlands Parcel A/Vista Oaks projects could connect to Monument Springs Drive if the Granite Lakes Estates project is not constructed. The preliminary location of this IOD is shown in blue on Figure 7. The ultimate location and design of the IOD would be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

126
Figure 7 – IOD Preliminary Location

Project Analysis:

The Granite Lakes Estates subdivision was originally approved more than two decades ago and has experienced multiple ownership changes, economic cycles, and infrastructure-related delays that were largely outside the control of any single development team. While Phase 1 of the project has been successfully completed, full buildout of the remaining lots has remained contingent upon completion of the Monument Springs Drive bridge connection.

Because the Monument Springs Bridge and extension of Monument Spri ngs Drive are not anticipated to be completed until late 2027 at the earliest, the existing project approvals, which are set to expire in January 2027, would lapse absent further action.

Given that construction of the remaining homes is a primary mechanism for reimbursing the City for the cost of the bridge, the time extension proposed through the DA would keep the project alive and help to facilitate this project’s share of the reimbursements.

If the DA is approved, the applicant has indicated that buildo ut of the remaining homes would occur in phases coordinated with the commencement and completion of the bridge improvements. Allowing limited concurrent home construction with bridge construction is intended to minimize overall disruption to nearby neighbo rhoods by consolidating construction activity into a single, coordinated timeframe, rather than extending impacts over multiple years.

127
The development team has stated that it conducted informal discussions with surrounding residents, during which there was general support for concurrent construction as a means of reducing prolonged traffic impacts, construction noise, and repeated contrac tor mobilization.

The DA establishes clear safeguards that tie residential occupancy to completion of the bridge, while still allowing limited early construction activity to proceed efficiently once bridge foundations are underway. Because any certificat es of occupancy issued prior to full operation of the bridge would be limited to a small number of model homes for business purposes only, construction of homes not permitted for occupancy would have minimal impact on local circulation. No residential occupancy would be allowed until the bridge is fully completed and a Notice of Completion is approved by the City Council.

Overall, the proposed 10 -year term provides a framework that aligns infrastructure delivery with residential construction, supports reim bursement of bridge costs through assessments, and establishes a stable path forward that benefits the City, future residents, and the surrounding community. The term would also be consistent with the Vista Oaks and Highlands Parcel A Development Agreement s, which both received an additional ten years in 2024.

Given the above, staff finds that approval of the proposed Development Agreement will allow a project that has been approved since 2002 to finally be completed. The City’s commitment to construct the bridge represents the final critical infrastructure element necessary to enable completion of the subdivision. To allow the City to recoup the cost of the bridge in a timely manner, construction of the Granite Lakes Estates project must proceed, and the Development Agreement provides the necessary mechanism for this to occur, similar to the 2024 DA approvals for the Vista Oaks and Highlands Parcel A project.

Environmental:

An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project was certified via City Counci l Resolution No. 2002 -165 on May 28th, 2002. An Addendum to the EIR addressing modifications to the project was certified via City Council Resolution No. 2022-98, on May 10, 2022. Because no changes are proposed as part of this request for extension to the previously approved project, pursuant to Section 15162 of California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), no additional environmental review is required.

The EIR and Addendum are available at the Rocklin Community Development Department and can also be found at the following link:

Granite Lakes Estates Final EIR
Public Comment:

Since the project was originally noticed for the Planning Commission hearing, staff has received approximately 40 written comments from neighboring residents, the majority of which express opposition to the project. These comments have been compiled into Attachment 1. Most of the public comments raise concerns regarding the proposal to allow construction of residential units prior to completion of the Monument Springs Bridge, 128
with many of the letters referencing a similar request that was denied by the City Council in 2022. Commenters note that the City Council’s previous decision was based on concerns regarding increased traffic along Aguilar Road and uncertainty surrounding the timing of the bridge construction. Several letters also state that Aguilar Road i s already unsafe and therefore cannot safely accommodate additional traffic, and that allowing additional traffic, including construction traffic, could create impacts and safety risks that should not be overlooked. Some letters also reference the 2002 EIR, stating that it is too outdated to rely upon and does not include an analysis of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), which is now a required analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Staff Responses to Public Comment
As discussed in the “Background” section above, the 2022 request to modify the General Development Plan and conditions of approval for the Granite Lake Estates and Vista Oaks Tentative Subdivision Maps was not approved by the City Council. However, that proposal differed from the current request in a few important ways. First, the applicant in 2022 proposed removing all restrictions on the construction or occupancy of additional homes prior to completion of the bridge, meaning there would have been no limitations tied to brid ge construction. If the bridge construction stalled out for any reason, there would have been no restriction on construction or occupancy of the homes. In contrast, the current proposal includes defined limitations and only allows occupancy for business purposes for a maximum of six to eight model homes until such time that the bridge is accepted by the City Council as being complete.

Additionally, in 2022 the timing of construction of the bridge was far less certain. In 2023, the City Council approved advancing City funds from the Traffic Circulation Impact Fees Fund to support early construction of the bridge, with reimbursement to occur over time through the BOLD CFD. As part of that action, the City Council directed staff to assume responsibility for delivering the project and to move forward with construction of the bridge as quickly and efficiently as reasonably possible. This approach removes any uncertainty that the bridge will move forward compared to the circumstances that existed in 2022.

With respect to roadway safety concerns, the City hired the traffic engineering consulting firm of Kimley-Horn who prepared the Aguilar Road Evaluation Safety Assessment in late 2019, which provides a technical evaluation of existing conditions along Aguilar Roa d.

The report evaluated the current roadway configuration, compared it to both past and current City and County standards, assessed the roadway’s existing level of safety, and identified potential recommendations to improve safety conditions. This report h as been included as Attachment 2.

The assessment concluded that while Aguilar Road’s existing cross -section, including travel lane widths, shoulder presence and width, cross-slope, and right-of-way, does not meet current City of Rocklin standards, the fac ility does not exhibit an unsafe pattern of collisions. In fact, the roadway’s collision rate was approximately half that of similar facilities elsewhere, as compared to the statewide collision rate for a 2-lane rural roadway.

The report also noted that recent traffic data shows daily traffic volumes have decreased 129
slightly; however, prevailing vehicle speeds are approximately 10 miles per hour greater than the posted prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour.

To reinforce safety along Aguilar Road, th e report recommended several strategies, including the installation of a centerline stripe where absent in order to visually narrow the perceived pavement width and help reduce prevailing speeds. The report also recommended installation of radar speed feed back signs in each direction to further reinforce the posted speed limit and reduce prevailing speeds. Both modifications have since been completed in accordance with those recommendations.

Staff acknowledges that the Kimley -Horn evaluation was prepared m ore than five years ago and that traffic conditions may have changed since that time. To account for this, staff obtained information regarding collisions that occurred along this segment of Aguilar Road during the interim period (2019 -2026) from the Rockl in Police Department. While seven (7) collisions were reported within this interim period, a majority of these incidents were attributable to factors that occur on any roadway, and not necessarily attributable to roadway conditions. Specifically, the data showed that the primary collision factors for the collisions were speeding, driving under the influence, two instances of backing up or improper merging, an unsafe lane change, and one collision that did not have a primary collision factor noted.

With regard to CEQA, as stated in the “Environmental” section above, an Addendum to the EIR that addressed modifications to the project was adopted in 2022 (EIR-2000-01A), confirming that the original 2002 EIR was sufficient and no subsequent or supplemental EIR was required for the project. With respect to traffic, the Addendum acknowledged that the law had changed regarding how transportation -related impacts are evaluated under CEQA. Traditionally, lead agencies used Level of Service (LOS) to assess the significance of such impacts, with greater levels of congestion considered more significant than lesser levels. The State has since adopted criteria emphasizing reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). However, as described in the Addendum, State guidance makes clear that the VMT requirement does not apply to EIRs issued before July 1, 2020.

In light of this, the City is not required to re -evaluate nor consider the extent to which changes in traffic circumstances have affected the LOS analysis performed in the Certified Final EIR. Because LOS is no longer considered a significant environmental impact under CEQA, and because VMT analysis is not required for an addendum to an EIR that was issued in draft form prior to July 1, 2020, additional traffic analysis was n ot required for the 2022 Addendum.

Even if the Addendum were required to analyze VMT for the modified project, there would be no net increase in VMT compared to the originally approved project, as the modifications do not result in an increase in density. In fact, as previously discussed, the Certified Final EIR evaluated a total single -family lot count of 119; however, the total lot count has been modified multiple times and was ultimately reduced to a final lot count of 113. As a result, VMT associated w ith full buildout of the project would be slightly lower than the version of the project evaluated in the originally Certified Final EIR. 130

Finally, it is important to note that grading and installation of infrastructure associated with the project may stil l proceed under the currently approved Tentative Subdivision Map through the issuance of improvement plans, even without approval of the proposed Development Agreement. The applicant’s request to construct homes concurrently with the infrastructure improvements could potentially shorten the overall construction timeline for the area, thereby reducing the duration of construction-related activity.

While the public comments raise concerns regarding traffic and safety along Aguilar Road, as well as CEQA -related issues, the available technical analysis and applicable State requirements do not identify conditions that would preclude approval of the proposed Development Agreement.

The applicant team has also provided a response to public concerns, which is inclu ded as Attachment 3.

Findings:

The Planning Commission finds the proposed DA , with recommended amendments incorporated, to be consistent with the existing General Plan designations, zoning, and requirements of the Government Code, and consistent with the requirements of Chapter

17.92 of the Rocklin Municipal Code. The proposed ten (10) year term would be compatible with an ticipated development of surrounding residentially designated properties, and would be consistent to those which had recently been granted to the adjacent Highlands Parcel A and Visa Oaks projects to the west.

The proposed DA would not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing in the immediate area, nor be detrimental or injurious to property or persons in the general neighborhood or the general welfare as a whole. The proposed DA will not adversely affect the orderly de velopment of property or the preservation of property values. The proposed development agreement is consistent with the provisions of Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5.

Planning Commission Recommendation:

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Development Agreement as proposed, with the amendment to remove Item 8.

As the Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity, Item 8 has been retained in the version of the Development Agreement presented to the Cit y Council for consideration. The City Council may choose to remove Item 8, retain it as proposed, or modify its provisions at its discretion.

131
From: Danielle Briscoe
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron Cc: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson
Subject: Subject: OPPOSE Granite Lakes Estates DA (DA2024-0001) — Feb. 17 Hearing — Public Safety & Liability Concerns
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2026 4:55:56 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. [email protected] — Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff,
I am writing to oppose the proposed Development Agreement for Granite Lakes Estates (DA2024-0001) and to ask the Commission to recommend denial. I am a resident who lives near the project, and my concerns center on public safety, the permanent impact on Aguilar Road, and the City’s legal liability.

The City Council already denied this. In 2022, the Council rejected a similar request from this developer specifically because of traffic safety concerns on Aguilar Road and uncertainty about the bridge timeline. Nothing has changed — the bridge is still not under construction and is not expected to be complete until late 2027 at the earliest.

Aguilar Road is dangerous for this traffic. It is a narrow street with no sidewalks, no curbs, and barely enough room for two cars to pass. Children play here. School buses stop here. Cyclists, joggers, and dog walkers use this road every day because there is nowhere else to go. The proposed DA would funnel heavy construction traffic from 65 homes down this road for up to two years. This is an obvious and serious safety hazard.

This is also a permanent traffic problem, not just a construction issue. Even after the bridge is built, residents of the 65 new homes heading south toward I-80, schools, and shopping will use Aguilar Road daily. That’s an estimated 300+ additional daily trips on a road never designed for it. No traffic study has analyzed this impact. No condition of approval addresses it. The bridge only provides a northbound alternative — it does not eliminate the permanent load on Aguilar Road.

The City faces real legal liability. Under Government Code §835, the City is liable for injuries caused by dangerous conditions of public property when it has actual notice of the danger. The 2022 denial proves the City already knows Aguilar Road is inadequate for this traffic. Under Baldwin v. State of California and Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit, the City cannot hide behind design immunity or blame third-party drivers when it knowingly created the dangerous condition.

The 2002 EIR is obsolete. It is 23 years old, uses traffic methodology (Level of Service) that is no longer valid under SB 743, and never analyzed the scenario of all traffic concentrated on Aguilar Road without the bridge. CEQA Guidelines §15162 requires supplemental environmental review when there are changed circumstances and new information — both of which clearly exist here.

I ask the Commission to:
132
• Recommend denial of DA2024-0001 as presented
• Require a current traffic study for Aguilar Road before any action • Require Aguilar Road to be improved to City standards (widened, sidewalks, curbs) before construction begins
• Require supplemental CEQA review of the 23-year-old EIR Build the bridge first. Fix Aguilar Road. Study the traffic. Then allow construction. Our neighborhood’s safety depends on it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Danielle Briscoe
5840 Green Mountain Lane, Rocklin, CA 95677
133
From: Mary C Cowen
To: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron
Subject: Monument Springs Bridge
Date: Sunday, February 15, 2026 4:06:22 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Please do not go back on promises.

Please build this bridge.

We have been residents for 30+ years in the same house at 5940 Green Mountain Lane and every time another house is built I fear that the safety of everyone evacuating in case of a fire will be deadly for a lot of us. My husband and I are 75 and 80 and my safety stress level goes up every year.

Please build this bridge before another developer talks you out of it. Please look out for us residents.

Sincerely,
Mary and Richard Cowen

134
From: SARAH DOLLAR
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron; Nathan Anderson; Arwen Wacht; David Mohlenbrok
Subject: OPPOSITION to 2/17/26 Agenda Item 2A: Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) Date: Monday, February 16, 2026 5:45:41 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

To Whom It May Concern,
I am formally submitting this statement in support of and consistent with the contents of Mrs. Rozek’s letter sent a few days ago (see below).

I reside at the end of Greenbrae Road. My parents, Terry and Jennifer Meinzer, have lived there for 48 years and previously owned all of the property now involved in this ongoing matter. I was not made aware of the underlying issues surrounding the subdivision and bridge obligation until I moved onto the property in 2014.

Upon moving there, I spoke with several neighboring homeowners who had recently built homes in the surrounding subdivision. They informed me that they were explicitly promised construction of the bridge at the time they met with the developer and designed their homes. Based on these representations, they proceeded with the purchase of their homes.

I subsequently learned that the bridge was intended to have been constructed more than 20 years ago and that approval of the subdivision was conditioned upon that commitment. The owners, investors, and builders involved agreed to those terms as part of the development process.

The continued failure to construct the bridge represents a longstanding unfulfilled obligation tied to the original development approval. This matter has persisted far too long and warrants resolution consistent with the commitments made to homeowners and the conditions under which the subdivision was permitted.

The bridge must be completed first to provide a dedicated route for construction traffic as originally intended. The request for "concurrent" construction circumvents the May 2022 City Council directive. Approving this amendment would set a dangerous precedent by ignoring established Conditions of Approval designed to protect residents.

Please do not allow history to repeat itself, as it did with prior decision-makers. The commitments made must be upheld.

I respectfully request that this issue be addressed promptly and in accordance with the original development agreements.

Sincerely,
Sarah Meinzer-Dollar
On 02/11/2026 10:57 PM PST Jessica Rozek <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Rocklin Planning Commission Members, Community Development Director, and Planning Staff:

As a resident of Granite Lake Estates for over a decade, I am writing to formally request that the Planning Commission deny the proposed Granite Lake Estates 135
Development Agreement (DA2024-0001). I am disappointed that the Staff Report recommends approval despite the negative impacts on our community and the disregard for prior City Council conditions.

This project has a documented history of timeline extensions, developer turnover, and unfulfilled promises. The developer is again requesting an extension and alterations to existing agreements that contradict prior Council directives. Specifically, the developer proposes that construction of the Monument Springs Bridge be "concurrent" with the construction of Granite Lake Estates. However, the current agreement requires the bridge to be completed prior to the issuance of any additional permits.

According to the Staff Report, the bridge may not be completed until late 2027 at the earliest. Under this proposal, the developer could begin massive infrastructure work immediately upon starting bridge construction. This would route all heavy equipment and construction vehicles through Aguilar, Greenbrae, and Foothill Roads. Routing construction traffic through these narrow residential streets for nearly two years poses a significant and avoidable safety risk. The City Council previously denied a similar request based on these public safety concerns, and no new circumstances justify a different outcome now.

Sincerely,
Jessica Rozek
4200 Caribou Court
Rocklin, CA 95677
[email protected]
136
From: [email protected]
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; [email protected]; Nathan Anderson; Arwen Wacht; David Mohlenbrok
Subject: OPPOSITION to 2/17/26 Agenda Item 2A: Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2026 2:17:15 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Wow, over $8million now to build the bridge!!! When we first started this mess, the city of Rocklin had the opportunity to build that bridge for under $2million. I request that any homeowners and taxpayers DO NOT foot the bill for the difference. It’s not their fault our city can’t manage our infrastructure plans.

I don’t trust that the contractor won’t just clear-cut the area and then go bankrupt again… leaving us all holding the cost due to procrastination.

Regards,
Lisa Douglas

137
From: Eric Feller
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron Cc: Nathan Anderson
Subject: Granite Lakes Estate proposal
Date: Friday, February 13, 2026 7:48:54 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners,
My name is Eric Feller and my wife and I have lived on Green Mountain Court, one of the streets that would be directly impacted by the Granite Lake Estates proposal, since 2012. I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the developer’s request to begin infrastructure construction concurrently with the Monument Springs Bridge project.

Shortly after we moved here in 2012, we were told that no new neighborhood construction would commence until the bridge was complete. Despite this, two new neighborhoods have been built off of Aguilar Road since then.

As you know, the developer's request was previously denied by the City Council for good reason. The existing Development Agreement clearly ties development activity to completion of the bridge. Allowing grading, deforestation, road construction, and model home development to begin before the bridge is completed would shift years of heavy construction traffic onto Aguilar and Freeman Roads — roads that were not designed or intended to handle that volume or type of use.

The bridge is not expected to be completed until the end of 2027. That would mean nearly two additional years of large construction vehicles, heavy equipment transport, dust, noise, and safety concerns affecting established neighborhoods. This is not a minor modification — it is a substantial change to the original agreement that residents relied upon when purchasing their homes.

Beyond the inconvenience and infrastructure impacts, there are serious public safety concerns. In June 2025, our area experienced a fire that highlighted the limitations of our current road network. Our residents already face constrained ingress and egress, and this incident only served to demonstrate how vulnerable our neighborhood could be if emergency access were to be restricted. Adding heavy construction traffic and road obstructions before the bridge is completed would further compromise emergency response times and evacuation routes, placing residents at unacceptable risk.

Residents built their lives here with the understanding that the bridge would be completed before major development activity commenced. Approving this request would undermine that agreement and shift both the safety risks and the burden of construction impacts onto existing neighborhoods.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the intent of the original Development Agreement, prioritize public safety, and deny the request to allow concurrent construction.

Thank you for your time, service, and thoughtful consideration of the community’s concerns. 138
From: Megan Foulger
Cc: Ben Foulger
Subject: Attention: Neighbors against allowing Granite Lakes Estates Building to Commence Prior to Monument Springs Bridge Completion
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:35:30 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff,
My name is Megan Foulger, and my husband, Ben Foulger, and I reside on Barrington Court, one of the neighboring streets that would be directly impacted by the Granite Lake Estates proposal. I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the developer’s request to begin infrastructure construction concurrently with the Monument Springs Bridge project.

As you know, this request was previously denied by the City Council for good reason. The existing Development Agreement clearly ties development activity to completion of the bridge. Allowing grading, deforestation, road construction, and model home development to begin before the bridge is completed would shift years of heavy construction traffic onto Aguilar and Freeman Roads — roads that were not designed or intended to handle that volume or type of use.

Beyond the inconvenience and infrastructure impacts, there are serious public safety concerns.

In June 2025, our area experienced a fire that highlighted the limitations of our current road network. Our residents already face constrained ingress and egress, and this incident only served to demonstrate how vulnerable our neighborhood could be if emergency access were to be restricted. Adding heavy construction traffic and road obstructions before the bridge is completed would further compromise emergency response times and evacuation routes, placing residents at unacceptable risk.

My primary concerns include:
• Significant traffic and safety impacts for families, children, pedestrians, and cyclists • Compromised emergency access and evacuation capacity, as demonstrated during the June 2025 fire
• Road deterioration and infrastructure strain
• Increased noise, dust, and environmental disruption
• The precedent of modifying previously established and relied-upon development conditions Residents built their lives here with the understanding that the bridge would be completed before major development activity commenced. Approving this request would undermine that agreement and shift both the safety risks and the burden of construction impacts onto existing 139
neighborhoods.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the intent of the original Development Agreement, prioritize public safety, and deny the request to allow concurrent construction.

Thank you for your time, service, and thoughtful consideration of the community’s concerns.

Sincerely,
Megan and Ben Foulger
140
From: David Mohlenbrok
To: Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson
Subject: Fwd: Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001 Date: Monday, February 16, 2026 10:46:15 AM
Begin forwarded message:

From: Aly Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Date: February 15, 2026 at 10:12:50 PM PST
To: David Mohlenbrok <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001

FYI

From: Bill Halldin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2026 7:42 PM
To: Aly Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001

Bill Halldin
Councilmember, City of Rocklin
916-718-1251
[email protected]

From: Greg Halstead <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2026 11:19 AM
To: Jared Thomas <[email protected]>; Gregg McKenzie <[email protected]>; Twiana Armstrong
<[email protected]>; Michael Barron <[email protected]>; Roberto Cortez <[email protected]>
Cc: David Bass <[email protected]>; Bill Halldin <[email protected]>; Ken Broadway <[email protected]>; Jill Gayaldo <[email protected]>; Greg Janda <[email protected]>
Subject: Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement / Development Agreement, DA2024-0001

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise 141
caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Planning Commission Members,
I am writing to express opposition to the request to allow residential construction to proceed prior to completion of the Monument Springs Bridge.

Historically, the City has recognized that the bridge is the critical infrastructure element needed to safely support full buildout of the Granite Lakes Estates project. While limited early construction was allowed in earlier phases to help offset infrastructure costs, the City has more recently reinforced the importance of ensuring bridge delivery before allowing significant additional residential development. This position has been based on traffic circulation impacts to surrounding neighborhoods, particularly along Aguilar Road, as well as uncertainty in past bridge construction timelines.

Allowing additional home construction before the bridge is complete risks repeating past patterns where housing advances ahead of critical infrastructure, potentially increasing traffic congestion and neighborhood impacts while leaving the community dependent on future bridge completion.

The long-standing policy direction has been to ensure the bridge is funded, constructed, and operational as the primary access point before full residential buildout occurs. Maintaining that sequencing protects existing residents, ensures proper traffic circulation, and upholds the intent of prior City decisions.

For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Planning Commission to maintain the City’s historical position and require completion of the Monument Springs Bridge prior to allowing further residential construction beyond previously established limits.

Respectfully,
Greg
6291 Brooshire Dr
142
From: Christine Pasley-Bogni
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; David Mohlenbrok; [email protected]; Nathan Anderson; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron
Subject: Monument Bridge
Date: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:29:43 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Good afternoon,
I am contacting all of you in effort to encourage you to stand against big developers and continue to support your existing residents by turning down any more construction to take place until the original promise of building Monument Bridge has taken place. That bridge was in plans to be built as far back as 1995 and somehow each time a new developer becomes the new land owner that piece gets forgotten about. The city has already done its part to appease them by building the China Garden bridge, now the developers need to uphold their end of the plans. The residents comforts and concerns should be taken into account before another developer repeats history and back out of their end of the deal. They will make more money at our cost and then leave til next time. I urge you all to deny their sneaky underhanded tactics once again. The needs and wants of our existing Rocklin residents should come first, before the wants of a big business.

Sincerely
Christine Pasley-Bogni
Sent from my iPhone
143
From: Nathan Anderson
Bcc: "Megan Foulger"; Ben Foulger; "Jessica Rozek"; "Christina Smith"; "Carol Rubin"; "Christine Pasley-Bogni"; "Andy Sutter"; "Eric Feller"; "Mary C Cowen"; "Danielle Briscoe"; "Vanessa Whitmore"; "Christine Sloan"; "Derrick Schmidt"; "SARAH DOLLAR"; "Vicki Schwermann"
Subject: Planning Commission Item 2A: Granite Lakes Estates DA Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2026 2:38:19 PM
Good afternoon.

In light of input received, including some legal questions that require additional review, staff will be recommending that the Planning Commission’s consideration of the Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement be continued to a date certain of March 17, 2026.

Thank you for your continued engagement in this process.

144
From: Jessica Rozek
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron; Nathan Anderson; Arwen Wacht; David Mohlenbrok
Subject: Subject: OPPOSITION to 2/17/26 Agenda Item 2A: Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement (DA2024- 0001)
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2026 10:57:34 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Rocklin Planning Commission Members, Community Development Director, and Planning Staff:

As a resident of Granite Lake Estates for over a decade, I am writing to formally request that the Planning Commission deny the proposed Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement (DA2024- 0001). I am disappointed that the Staff Report recommends approval despite the negative impacts on our community and the disregard for prior City Council conditions.

Sincerely,
Jessica Rozek
4200 Caribou Court
Rocklin, CA 95677
[email protected]
145
Aguilar Road is a 1.5 lane, old county road that in the past 20 years has become the default freeway access for an increasing number of developments (GLE 1, Rocklin Meadows, Granite Bluffs). There is already too much traffic for this road, with property lines very close to the roadway and only intermittent sidewalks. The lack of a second egress point is a serious safety issue for the whole neighborhood.

Until recently, everyone in the area, including GLE Phase 1, that relies on Aguilar Road for egress had to tolerate additional daily construction traffic from the Rocklin Meadows development. And now you are about to repeat that mistake by allowing so-called “concurrent” construction of the Monument Springs Bridge with the buildout of GLE.

Page 12 ends

residents” who support the “concurrent” approach because it would reduce prolonged traffic impacts and related detriments. This assertion is demonstrably nonsense. What will happen is work on the Bridge will be strung out as long as possible while building the homes will be accelerated, and meanwhile all the construction vehicles will travel the length of Greenbrae and Aguilar Roads. The only way to reduce traffic impact on Greenbrae and Aguilar during the proposed buildout is to FINISH THE BRIDGE first. On page 9 of the Report, Staff states that prep work for the Bridge is “90%” complete and that construction would take 6 months. So do it now. Get it over with.

The City of Rocklin and the various owners of the proposed developments have been procrastinating the Bridge construction for more than 20 years. But even now, page 8 of the proposed Development Agreement specifically states: [The] Parties agree that the building permit for the 49th residential dwelling and all such subsequent building permits may be issued upon commencement of construction of the bridge foundations/abutments [and] there shall be no restrictions on issuance of a total of eight 8 [building permits for model homes] and temporary certificates of occupancy therefor without further amendment to this Agreement.

Let me repeat: Per the proposed DA, the Developers get 8 model homes and all the building permits at the first shovelful of Bridge construction with no restrictions. If they go bankrupt, or sell the properties, or just abandon the project (as happened previously) we will be stuck with a Bridge that consists of a couple of cubic feet of concrete and a bunch of half-finished model homes while the parties again point fingers at each other and evade responsibility. We are well past “Fool us twice, shame on us” territory and into “Fool us three or four times –. " Enough. Don’t do this.
146
Comments on the Staff Report:

Application Request/Project Description The project requests approval of a Development Agreement for the remaining phases of the Granite Lakes Estates project, a 116-lot single-family residential subdivision.

The Development Agreement would extend the term of the previously approved Tentative Subdivision Map (SD-2000-02A) and Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit (TRE-2000- 33A) for a period of ten (10) years, and would allow construction of the remaining 65 residences to proceed concurrently with construction of the Monument Springs Bridge.

Monument Springs Bridge and Extension of Monument Springs Drive Consistent with the requirements of the Southeast Rocklin Circulation Element, adopted in 1993, primary access to the project site was to be via an off-site extension of Monument Springs Road from its terminus on the north side of Secret Ravine to Greenbrae Road. The extension included construction of a developer-funded bridge over the creek and a two-lane road to connect to Greenbrae Road (Figure 5).

At the time, the property for the bridge portion of this off-site improvement was located in an area under the jurisdiction of Placer County. Known as the Greenbrae Area, this island of Placer County controlled land was annexed into the City of Rocklin in 2016. Based on its original approvals, the Granite Lakes Estates project was allowed to construct up to a maximum of 40 homes in the first phase of development in order to partially offset the cost of off-site improvements.

Bridge Financing and Funding On May 10 and June 14, 2022, the City Council affirmed special conditions requiring the owners of the Granite Lakes Estates project, along with the Vista Oaks and Highlands Parcel A projects, to form a Bond Opportunities for Land Development (BOLD) Community Facilities District (CFD). This requirement is consistent with the City’s Land Secured Financing policies and procedures adopted under Resolution No. 2005-112 and is intended to finance construction of the Monument Springs Bridge, roadway extension, and other eligible improvements prior to commencement of any site work for the subdivisions. In addition to approximately $198,000 which had been previously collected by the City from Highlands Units 2 and 3 for construction of the bridge and roadway extension, the City Council took a significant step toward ensuring delivery of the Monument Springs Bridge on June 28, 2022, by allocating $1.5 million in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement Plan.

During those same meetings in 2022, the City Council also considered applicant-initiated requests to modify the approved General Development Plan for the Granite Lakes Estates subdivision, as well as the conditions of approval for the Granite Lakes Estates and Vista Oaks Tentative Subdivision Maps. The proposed modifications were intended to facilitate construction of the Monument Springs Bridge and roadway extensions by allowing additional homes to be constructed prior to completion of the bridge and roadway improvements, in support of formation of a Community Facilities District and issuance of BOLD bonds. Due to community concerns regarding increased traffic on Aguilar Road and uncertainty Commented [CR1]: This is substantially the same
agreement the developer(s) requested in 2022.

Commented [CR2]: Meaningless, unenforceable
147
surrounding the timing of the bridge construction, the City Council did not approve the amendments to allow for the construction of additional homes within the Granite Lakes Estates project prior to completion of the Monument Springs Bridge and roadway improvements. The City Council did however approve Resolution No. 2022-127, which amended the Granite Lakes Estates Tentative Subdivision Map and Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit to change some conditions of approval, mainly related to BOLD financing.

On March 28, 2023, the City Council approved advancing City funds from the Traffic Circulation Impact Fees Fund to support early construction of the bridge, with reimbursement to the City occurring over time through the BOLD CFD. As part of that action, the City Council directed staff to assume responsibility for the project and deliver the bridge as quickly and efficiently as reasonably possible.

Bridge Timeline To support the successful design and construction of the project, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) on September 7, 2023, for bridge design and construction management services. On December 12, 2023, the City Council approved the selection of Dokken Engineering for the design component and Consor North America, Inc. for construction management. Since that date, bridge design has been steadily progressing, with 90 percent design plans anticipated to be submitted by Dokken in May of this year. Environmental permitting is also underway. The current construction schedule anticipates a spring 2027 construction start datewith an anticipated completion date approximately six months later. If the project proceeds as planned, the bridge is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2027.

Proposed Development Agreement The proposed DA would extend the term of the previously approved Tentative Subdivision Map and Oak Tree Preservation Permit for an additional ten (10) years, and allow application for and construction of the remaining homes to proceed concurrently with construction of the Monument Springs Bridge.

According to the development team, the requested 10-year term is intended to provide a realistic and responsible entitlement horizon that accounts for potential uncertainties associated with bridge timing, funding coordination, permitting, construction sequencing, and broader economic conditions that could impact project delivery. The development team has stated that a shorter extension would risk requiring additional discretionary approvals before the project can reasonably be completed, repeating a pattern that has occurred previously and creating uncertainty for both the City and the development team.

The DA would allow building permits for the remaining 65 residences to be issued upon commencement of construction of the Monument Springs Bridge foundations and abutments. It would also allow for issuance of up to six (6) model home building permits and temporary certificates of occupancy, with the City Manager authorized to approve up to two (2) additional model home permits, for a maximum total of eight (8) No other certificates of occupancy could be approved until the City Council approves the Notice of Completion accepting the public improvements associated with the extension of Monument Springs Drive and completion of the Monument Springs Bridge, thus helping to minimize automobile trips on local roadways such as Aguilar Road from the remaining non-model home residences.

If the DA is approved, the applicant has indicated that buildout of the remaining homes would occur in phases coordinated with the commencement and completion of the bridge improvements. Allowing Commented [CR3]: I think you mean “slowly” here
Commented [CR4]: SO, after 20 years, not even the first shovel of dirt for another year, and that’s just
“anticipated”
Commented [CR5]: Bridge construction will take 6
months. Do it already.

Commented [CR6]: That’s 65 additional homes and still
no bridge! Bridge completion tentatively in late 2027.

Construction on many/most of the houses will be in
progress before the bridge is complete. If the developer abandons the project again, we are stuck with 65 more
houses/building permits and no bridge!
Commented [CR7]: Actually, a longer extension
increases the risk of requiring additional approvals
Commented [CR8]: Developers can dig one hole and
instantly get 65 permits
Commented [CR9]: All the construction traffic for the
infrastructure of the entire development and the 8 model homes would go down Greenbrae and Aguilar. If the
project is sold or abandoned during construction we are left with 8 half-completed houses, 65 building permits
AND STILL NO BRIDGE.
148
limited concurrent home construction with bridge construction is intended to minimize overall disruption to nearby neighborhoods by consolidating construction activity into a single, coordinated timeframe, rather than extending impacts over multiple years.

The development team has stated that it conducted informal discussions with surrounding residents, during which there was general support for concurrent construction as a means of reducing prolonged traffic impacts, construction noise, and repeated contractor mobilization.

Because any certificates of occupancy issued prior to full operation of the bridge would be limited to a small number of model homes, construction of homes not permitted for occupancy would have minimal impact on local circulation. No residential occupancy would be allowed until the bridge is fully completed and a Notice of Completion is approved by the City Council.

Commented [CR10]: No hard and fast timelines. The
only way to minimize disruption to the nearby
neighborhood is to finish the Bridge first and establish an alternate egress before any subdivision construction
begins.

Commented [CR11]: What residents? I would like to
hear from them. This is nonsense.

Commented [CR12]: I haven’t seen any yet.

Commented [CR13]: Contradicts the previous
sentence. 8 COs would be approved at the first shovel of dirt for the bridge, plus the developer gains building
permits for the rest of the homes in the subdivision, all still with no Bridge
Commented [CR14]: Only if the Bridge is completed
first. There are significant traffic flow and safety concerns without an alternate exit to Rocklin Road and I-80
149
Comments on the Development Agreement
Owner/Applicant Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. owns APNs 454-070-049, -050, -051, -052, and -054.

Real Property Investment Pros, Inc. and
Capital Equity Management Group, Inc. own 045-030-070.

The applicant is NG Alexander Real Estate Development, LLC. c/o Nick Alexander.

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO GRANITE LAKES ESTATES This Development Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this ____ day of ______, 2026, by and between the CITY OF ROCKLIN, a municipal corporation (“City”), and CAPITAL EQUITY MANAGEMENT GROUP , INC., a California corporation and REAL PROPERTY INVESTMENT PROS INC., a Nevada corporation (collectively, “Landowners”). City and Landowners are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties” and singularly as “Party. ”
Notwithstanding Project Approvals requiring the extension of Monument Spring Drive and construction of Monument Springs Bridge before the 49th building permit, the Parties agree that the building permit for the 49th residential dwelling and all such subsequent building permits may be issued upon commencement of construction of the bridge foundations/abutments for the Monument Springs Drive Bridge.Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, there shall be no restrictions on issuance of up to six (6) model home building permits and temporary certificates of occupancy therefor. The City Manager shall have authority to permit issuance of an additional two (2) model home building permits (for a total of eight (8)) and temporary certificates of occupancy therefor without further amendment to this Agreement upon a showing of good cause by Landowners. No other Certificates of Occupancy shall be approved until a Notice of Completion is approved by the City Council, signifying the acceptance of public improvements related to the extension of Monument Springs Drive and the completion of the Monument Springs Drive Bridge. .

Commented [CR15]: Developers get all the building
permits and no restrictions on COs for 6-8 model homes
at the first and potentially only shovel of dirt for the Bridge.

Commented [CR16]: But if the project is abandoned,
the 8 COs and building permits remain – without a Bridge. 150
From: Derrick Schmidt
To: Nathan Anderson
Subject: Granite Lakes Estate Subdivision Extension
Date: Monday, February 16, 2026 4:42:44 PM
Attachments: Greenbrae Road Trucks.jpg
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Mr. Anderson,

My name Derrick Schmidt. I have been a resident of “Greenbrae Island”, specifically 4584 Greenbrae Road, Rocklin CA 95677, for almost 22 years now (we occupied our home in July of 2004).

It has come to my attention that the entity planning to build additional homes in the Grantie Lakes Estates Development is AGAIN attempting to postpone constructing the Monument Springs Drive extension.

PLEASE, all of you
, walk down Aguilar Road sometime and imagine what it was like the previous times major excavation projects happened in our neighborhood – at least 3 since I have lived here. Walk your dog(s) down Aguilar Road, ride your E-bikes down Aguilar with your kids, stand at the school bus stop with the kids on Aguilar Road or at the intersection of Aguilar and Greenbrae Roads. There is barely enough room for two cars driving opposite directions. We must pull into the dirt when the school bus drives down Aguilar Road because of how narrow it is. Then imagine what it would be like (as it has been in the past) with a constant caravan of large dump trucks.

The Monument Springs Drive extension is needed ESPECIALLY BEFORE any
significant development.

It is just not safe having all the existing traffic going through Aguilar Road, much less all the additional construction traffic. I am also concerned with ever increasing fire danger (having been recently required by my homeowner’s insurance company to make fire resistant modifications to my home) that we would be trapped without additional egress options. This has come to be much more of a concern for me after my childhood home burned to the ground in the Palisades fire.

Included is a photo – just a glimpse – of one of our previous experiences with development down the street.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Respectfully,

151
From: Christine Sloan
To: Arwen Wacht; David Mohlenbrok; Nathan Anderson; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron
Subject: RE Feb 17th planning commission meeting
Date: Monday, February 16, 2026 3:28:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff,
In light of the Granite Lake Estates Concurrent Construction Request:

I am a resident of Brookshire Drive and will be directly affected. Please do not allow further development to proceed without having the Monument Spring Bridge complete. Aguilar Road is narrow and does not have sidewalks. I think it is dangerous and irresponsible to allow construction traffic on it for such a big project.

During the last construction project the road was torn up multiple times with potholes. The road is not suitable for the wear and tear that will occur or the added traffic.

We love living in Rocklin and hope and trust you will make decisions in the best interests for the residents of Rocklin.

Thank you, Christine Sloan
152
From: Christina Smith
To: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron
Subject: Opposition to Granite Lake Estates Concurrent Construction Request – Feb. 17 Planning Commission Meeting Date: Thursday, February 12, 2026 9:39:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff,
My name is Christina Smith, and I am a resident on one of the main streets (Greenbrae) that would be directly impacted by the Granite Lake Estates proposal. I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the developer’s request to begin infrastructure construction concurrently with the Monument Springs Bridge project.

As you know, this request was previously denied by City Council for good reason.

The existing Development Agreement clearly ties development activity to completion of the bridge. Allowing grading, deforestation, road construction, and model home development to begin before the bridge is completed would shift years of heavy construction traffic onto Aguilar and Freeman Roads — roads that were not intended to handle that volume or type of use.

The bridge is not expected to be completed until the end of 2027. That would mean nearly two years of large construction vehicles, heavy equipment transport, dust, noise, and safety concerns affecting existing neighborhoods. This is not a minor adjustment — it is a substantial change to the original agreement that residents relied upon.

My primary concerns include:

Significant traffic and safety impacts for families, children, and pedestrians Road deterioration and infrastructure strain
Increased noise, dust, and environmental disruption
The precedent of modifying previously established and relied-upon development conditions
Residents purchased homes and built their lives here with the understanding that the bridge would be completed before major development activity commenced. Approving this request undermines that agreement and places the burden on existing neighborhoods.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the intent of the original Development Agreement and deny the request to allow concurrent construction.

Thank you for your time, service, and thoughtful consideration of the community’s 153
From: [email protected]
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron; Nathan Anderson; Arwen Wacht; David Mohlenbrok
Subject: Public Comment – DA2024-0001 (Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement) Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2026 3:36:54 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commission Members,
I just learned about the Agenda Item 2A – Granite Lake Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001).

My wife and I purchased our home at 4439 Greenbrae Road in December 2021. At the time of purchase, the approved Conditions of Approval required completion of the Monument Springs Bridge prior to issuance of additional permits for the remaining homes. That sequencing was a material component of the development framework governing this area.

The bridge-first requirement was not symbolic. It was the mechanism intended to:

Provide a dedicated access route for future construction traffic Prevent extended heavy construction routing through established residential streets
Protect pedestrian safety and emergency access
Ensure infrastructure capacity keeps pace with build-out The proposed amendment would materially alter that sequencing by allowing additional homes to proceed “concurrently” with bridge construction. Based on the Staff Report, the bridge may not be completed until late 2027. That could result in prolonged construction traffic through Greenbrae, Aguilar, and Foothill Roads before the intended mitigation infrastructure is operational.

When homeowners purchase property subject to published Conditions of Approval, there is reasonable reliance that those conditions will be enforced as written — especially when those conditions were reaffirmed by the City Council as recently as May 2022. Modifying them now, without bridge completion as a prerequisite, undermines predictability in land use governance and shifts risk to existing residents.

If the Commission considers approval, I respectfully request that it require objective, enforceable milestones tied to actual bridge completion — not merely commencement 154
of construction. For example:

Full execution and bonding of the bridge improvement agreement Demonstrated construction progress milestones
A defined cap on building permits or certificates of occupancy prior to bridge completion
Automatic suspension triggers if bridge construction is delayed Starting bridge construction is not equivalent to completing it.

The Conditions of Approval were established to balance development rights with community protection. Maintaining the original sequencing preserves that balance and protects the integrity of prior Council decisions.

For these reasons, I respectfully request denial of DA2024-0001 as currently proposed, or, at minimum, substantial modification to ensure bridge completion remains the controlling prerequisite for additional residential construction.

Sincerely,
Michael & Lori Stromar
4439 Greenbrae Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
155
From: Andy Sutter
To: Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron Cc: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson
Subject: OPPOSE Granite Lakes Estates DA (DA2024-0001) — Feb. 17 Hearing — Public Safety & Liability Concerns Date: Friday, February 13, 2026 6:02:18 PM
Attachments: Formal Opposition to Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement 2-13-2026.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners and Staff,
I am writing to oppose the proposed Development Agreement for Granite Lakes Estates (DA2024-0001) and to ask the Commission to recommend denial. I am a resident who lives near the project, and my concerns center on public safety, the permanent impact on Aguilar Road, and the City’s legal liability.

I ask the Commission to:
• Recommend denial of DA2024-0001 as presented
• Require a current traffic study for Aguilar Road before any action 156
• Require Aguilar Road to be improved to City standards (widened, sidewalks, curbs) before construction begins
• Require supplemental CEQA review of the 23-year-old EIR • Forward this letter to the City Attorney as formal notice of a dangerous condition under §835.2(a)
Please build the bridge first, fix Aguilar Road, and study the traffic. Then allow construction.

Our neighborhood’s safety depends on it.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Anthony D. Sutter, P.E.

Licensed Civil Engineer
5933 Green Mountain Ln
Rocklin, CA 95677
attachment: Formal Opposition to Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement 2-13- 2026.pdf
157

COMPREHENSIVE FORMAL LETTER
Opposition to Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) Anthony D. Sutter
5933 Green Mountain Ln
Rocklin, CA 95677
[email protected]
(916) 835-3588
February 13, 2026
Rocklin Planning Commission
City of Rocklin Community Development Department
3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
Via Email and U.S. Mail to: All Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff (addresses below) RE: OPPOSITION AND FORMAL NOTICE OF LIABILITY CONCERNS — Granite Lakes Estates Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) — February 17, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing
Dear Chair Thomas, Commissioners McKenzie, Armstrong, Cortez, and Barron:

I am writing to urge the Planning Commission to recommend denial of the proposed Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) for the Granite Lakes Estates project. I am a resident who lives near the project site, and I have serious concerns about public safety, legal liability, and the adequacy of environmental review. I respectfully request that this letter be made part of the permanent public record and forwarded to the City Attorney’s Office.

This letter addresses not only the temporary construction-phase impacts of this proposal, but also the permanent, ongoing traffic safety impacts that 65 additional homes will impose on Aguilar Road and the surrounding neighborhood — impacts that no current traffic study has analyzed and that no condition of approval addresses.

1. The City Council Already Denied This Request in 2022 In June 2022, the City Council considered and rejected the developer’s request to allow construction of additional homes within the Granite Lakes Estates project prior to completion of the Monument Springs Bridge and roadway improvements. As the Staff Report for this very hearing acknowledges, the City Council denied that request due to community concerns about increased traffic on Aguilar Road and uncertainty surrounding the timing of bridge construction.

Those same concerns have not been resolved — they have only intensified. The bridge is still not under construction. It is not even at final design: 90% design plans are not expected until May 2026, and construction is not anticipated to begin until spring 2027 at the earliest, with completion by late 2027 in the best-case scenario. The developer is now back before the City, repackaging essentially the same request the City Council already rejected, and asking the Planning Commission to override that prior decision.
158

2. The Proposed DA Overrides Existing Safety Protections The existing conditions of approval (Resolution 2022-127, Special Condition 19d) are clear: the extension of Monument Springs Drive and the bridge over Secret Ravine must be completed and open to traffic before the 49th building permit is issued. This condition was specifically designed to protect existing residents from traffic impacts.

Section 8 of the proposed Development Agreement directly overrides this protection. It would allow the 49th building permit — and all subsequent permits for the remaining 65 homes — to be issued as soon as construction of the bridge foundations and abutments merely “commences.” In addition, up to 8 model home building permits could be issued with no bridge-related trigger at all. This means the developer could begin full-scale grading, infrastructure construction, road building, lot development, and home construction across the entire remaining subdivision while the bridge remains years from completion.

3. Aguilar Road Cannot Safely Handle Construction Traffic Without the Monument Springs Bridge, all construction traffic — heavy equipment, grading machinery, concrete trucks, lumber deliveries, contractor vehicles, and all other construction- related trips — must use Aguilar Road and/or Freeman Road to access the project site. These roads are completely inadequate and unsafe for this type and volume of traffic.

Aguilar Road is a narrow, rural residential street. It has no sidewalks. It has no curbs along significant portions. It is barely wide enough for two passenger vehicles to pass each other safely. On any given day, you will find children playing near the road, school buses picking up and dropping off students, cyclists sharing the road with no bike lane or shoulder, joggers and runners with no sidewalk to use, and residents walking their dogs — all forced to share the same narrow pavement with vehicles because there is simply nowhere else for them to go.

Adding a constant stream of heavy construction vehicles — excavators and bulldozers being trailered in, dump trucks hauling dirt and fill, concrete mixers, flatbed trucks delivering building materials, and dozens of daily contractor vehicle trips — to this environment for one to two years or longer is an obvious, foreseeable, and serious danger to residents, children, pedestrians, and cyclists.

4. The Permanent Traffic Impact on Aguilar Road Has Been Ignored This is not solely a construction-traffic issue. The project will permanently and substantially increase daily traffic on Aguilar Road, and this impact has never been studied or addressed.

The Monument Springs Bridge, when eventually completed, will provide a connection northward across Secret Ravine to China Garden Road. However, for residents of the Granite Lakes Estates subdivision heading south toward I-80, commercial services, schools, and other destinations, the most direct route is south through Greenbrae Road to Aguilar Road. The bridge does not eliminate Aguilar Road traffic — it merely provides an alternative route in one direction.

Using standard ITE trip generation rates for single-family homes (approximately 9–10 vehicle trips per household per day), 65 new homes will generate approximately 585–650 new daily vehicle trips. Even if half of those trips use the bridge route northward, that still means approximately 300 or more additional daily vehicle trips on Aguilar Road — permanently. 159
Combined with the existing 48 Phase 1 homes already using this road, this could more than double the current traffic volume on a road with no sidewalks, no curbs, and no capacity for it.

Critically, existing Condition 19c of Resolution 2022-127 states that upon bridge completion, “construction traffic for the Granite Lake Estates subdivision shall utilize that roadway instead of Aguilar Road.” This condition applies only to construction vehicles. There is no condition restricting or even addressing the permanent daily residential traffic that 65 new households will generate on Aguilar Road. The DA is entirely silent on this issue.

The 2002 EIR’s traffic analysis was built on the assumption that the Monument Springs Bridge would serve as primary access, consistent with the Southeast Rocklin Circulation Element adopted in 1993. But no updated traffic study has been conducted analyzing the cumulative impact of adding 65 homes to Aguilar Road under current conditions. The Commission is being asked to approve a project with a massive, permanent traffic impact on a substandard road without any current data on whether that road can safely handle it.

5. Aguilar Road Must Be Improved to City Standards as a Condition of Approval
If the City is going to approve a project that will permanently increase traffic on Aguilar Road by hundreds of daily vehicle trips, then Aguilar Road must be improved to safely handle that traffic before construction begins. The conditions of approval require full urban improvements — curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights — for the new streets inside the subdivision. Yet Aguilar Road, the existing public road that will actually absorb the traffic impact, receives nothing. This is an unacceptable inconsistency.

I request that the following be added as conditions of approval:
a. A current, comprehensive traffic study must be completed for Aguilar Road and Freeman Road analyzing both construction-phase and post-buildout permanent traffic volumes, pedestrian and bicycle safety, school bus operations, and road capacity. b. Aguilar Road must be improved to current City street standards prior to any construction activity. Improvements should include widening to accommodate two-way traffic plus construction/service vehicles, sidewalks on both sides, curbs and gutters, adequate drainage, and street lighting.
c. A Construction Traffic Management Plan must be prepared and approved by the City Engineer, specifying haul routes, hours of operation, speed limits, flagging requirements, school-bus-schedule avoidance windows, and pedestrian safety measures. d. The developer must fund or proportionally contribute to Aguilar Road improvements, just as developers are required to build infrastructure inside their subdivisions. Fair-share traffic mitigation fees should be assessed for the permanent increase in traffic on Aguilar Road.
e. Traffic signals or traffic control improvements must be evaluated at key intersections along the Aguilar Road corridor to safely manage the increased volumes. f. The developer must post a bond for road damage repair on Aguilar Road and Freeman Road attributable to construction traffic.

6. The “Consolidation” Argument Is Misleading
160
The Staff Report suggests that allowing concurrent construction would minimize disruption by consolidating activity into a single timeframe. This framing is misleading. Concurrent construction means the neighborhood would experience both bridge construction and full-scale subdivision construction simultaneously — doubling the heavy equipment, doubling the truck traffic, and doubling the daily disruption, all routed through Aguilar Road. This does not consolidate impacts. It concentrates and amplifies them during the very period when Aguilar Road is least able to handle additional traffic safely.

7. Formal Notice of Liability Under Government Code §835 I write to place this Planning Commission and City Council on formal notice that approving this Development Agreement creates a foreseeable dangerous condition of public property under Government Code §835.

Government Code §835 imposes liability on a public entity for injury caused by a “dangerous condition” of its property when the entity had actual or constructive notice. Section 830(a) defines a dangerous condition as one creating a substantial risk of injury when the property is used with due care in a reasonably foreseeable manner. Pedestrians, children, cyclists, and joggers using Aguilar Road are exercising due care in a reasonably foreseeable manner.

The City’s own 2022 denial establishes actual notice under §835.2(a). When the City Council denied the same request in 2022 specifically because of traffic safety concerns on Aguilar Road, it created an irrefutable record of actual knowledge of the dangerous condition.

The City cannot now claim ignorance. This letter, and every public comment submitted at this hearing, adds additional documented notice.

Under the California Supreme Court’s decision in Baldwin v. State of California (1972) 6 Cal.3d 424, a public entity “may not, ostrich-like, hide its head in the blueprints, blithely ignoring the actual operation of the plan.” When changed physical conditions — such as dramatically increased traffic volumes on a narrow road — make a roadway dangerous, design immunity under §830.6 is lost. The three-element test established in Cornette v. Department of Transportation (2001) 26 Cal.4th 63 is satisfied here: (1) the design has become dangerous due to changed conditions, (2) the City has actual notice, and (3) the City has had reasonable time to act.

Under Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (2003) 30 Cal.4th 139, the City remains liable even if a third-party driver’s negligence is the immediate cause of injury, because the City created the condition that exposed residents to increased danger. The reasonableness defense under §835.4 is unavailable when the City has already deemed this routing unreasonable by denying the same proposal in 2022.

If this DA is approved and any person — a child, a cyclist, a jogger, a dog walker, a school bus passenger — is injured or killed on Aguilar Road as a result of construction traffic or increased residential traffic from this project, the City will face substantial tort liability. I preserve the right to file tort claims under Government Code §§900–913 in the event of any such injury. I request this letter be forwarded to the City Attorney and retained as formal notice of a dangerous condition under §835.2(a).

8. The Developer Indemnification Is Inadequate to Protect the Public The DA’s indemnification provision requiring the developer to indemnify the City is itself an admission that the City recognizes the project creates foreseeable liability risk. However, this 161
indemnification is inadequate for several reasons. First, it protects only the City’s financial exposure, not the safety of residents. Injured residents are not parties to the DA and cannot enforce the indemnification clause. Second, if the developer becomes insolvent — as notably occurred with this very project when construction stalled around 2009 and the property went into receivership — the indemnification becomes worthless, leaving the City fully exposed. Third, under Civil Code §2782, indemnification provisions that cover the indemnitee’s own negligence may be void or unenforceable.

The City cannot outsource its obligation to protect public safety by contractually shifting financial risk to a private developer. Indemnification is a financial mechanism, not a safety measure. It does nothing to prevent a child from being struck by a cement truck on a road with no sidewalks.

9. CEQA Requires Supplemental Environmental Review
The 2002 Environmental Impact Report (EIR-2000-01) is now 23 years old and functionally obsolete for purposes of analyzing the impacts of this Development Agreement. The DA constitutes a new discretionary approval that triggers CEQA Guidelines §15162, which requires a supplemental or subsequent EIR when there are substantial changes to a project or its circumstances, or new information of substantial importance.

Three independent triggers under §15162(a) compel supplemental review:

Substantial changes to the project (§15162(a)(1)): The DA fundamentally alters construction phasing by allowing all 65 homes before the bridge is complete. The 2002 EIR analyzed impacts assuming the bridge would provide primary access. The DA creates an entirely new traffic pattern — all construction and a significant portion of permanent residential traffic concentrated on Aguilar Road — that was never analyzed.

Changed circumstances (§15162(a)(2)): In 23 years, traffic volumes in the area have increased, residential density has grown, and regulatory standards have changed dramatically.

Most significantly, SB 743 replaced Level of Service (LOS) with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the required metric for transportation impact analysis, codified at CEQA Guidelines §15064.3 and mandatory since July 1, 2020. The 2002 EIR’s entire traffic analysis uses a methodology that is no longer legally valid under CEQA.

New information of substantial importance (§15162(a)(3)): The City’s own 2022 finding that Aguilar Road traffic is a safety concern, the lack of any current traffic study, and the absence of any analysis of construction-phase impacts on Aguilar Road in the scenario where the bridge does not yet exist all constitute new information that was not before the City in 2002.

Under Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast AQMD (2010) 48 Cal.4th 310, the environmental baseline must reflect existing physical conditions, not 23-year-old data. The City cannot rely on a 2002 EIR to approve a 2026 Development Agreement that creates traffic and safety impacts never contemplated in the original analysis. I request that the City prepare a supplemental EIR or, at minimum, an updated traffic impact analysis before acting on this DA.

10. The Developer’s Claimed Neighbor Support Is Unverified The Staff Report notes that the development team claims to have conducted “informal discussions with surrounding residents” showing “general support for concurrent construction.” This is a vague and unverifiable claim. No documentation, petition, survey results, or other evidence has been presented. The Commission should not give weight to unsubstantiated 162
assertions, especially when the City Council heard directly from residents opposing this concept in 2022. I request that the developer be required to provide specific documentation of these claimed discussions, including dates, locations, names of residents contacted, and the substance of those conversations.

11. A 10-Year Extension Is Excessive
The proposed DA would extend the life of this project for an additional ten years. This project was originally approved in 2002 and has been through multiple ownership changes, amendments, and extensions over more than two decades. Entitlements that have never been fully exercised should be reevaluated under current conditions and standards, not perpetually extended. Granting another decade of vested rights removes the City’s ability to revisit the project’s terms if circumstances change — including changes in traffic conditions, environmental regulations, or community needs.

12. Public Records Act Requests
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code §§7920.000–7930.215), I intend to submit formal requests for the following categories of records, and I place the City on notice to preserve all responsive documents:
• All traffic studies, impact analyses, traffic counts, and speed surveys for Aguilar Road and Freeman Road from 2018 to present
• All internal staff communications (emails, memos, messages) regarding Aguilar Road safety, the DA, and construction traffic routing
• All communications between City staff and the developer regarding the DA, bridge timing, and construction phasing
• Documentation of the developer’s claimed “informal discussions” with neighbors — sign-in sheets, presentation materials, meeting summaries, and correspondence • All bridge construction timelines, engineering reports, milestone schedules, and funding/financing documents
• All records from the 2022 City Council denial — staff reports, deliberations, audio recordings, and the findings and basis for denial
• All fire department, EMS, and police input regarding Aguilar Road access and safety during construction
• All resident complaints regarding traffic safety on Aguilar Road • All risk assessments, vehicle trip generation estimates, and insurance certificates related to the DA

13. My Requests to the Planning Commission
For the reasons set forth above, I respectfully ask the Planning Commission to:

1. Recommend denial of the proposed Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) as presented.

2. Uphold the City Council’s 2022 decision and the existing condition requiring completion of the Monument Springs Bridge and Monument Springs Drive extension before issuance of the 49th building permit.
163

3. Require a current, comprehensive traffic study analyzing both construction-phase and permanent post-buildout traffic impacts on Aguilar Road and Freeman Road before any action is taken on this DA.

4. Require Aguilar Road to be improved to current City street standards — widened with sidewalks on both sides, curbs, gutters, and adequate lighting — prior to any construction activity, with costs borne by the developer.

5. Require supplemental CEQA review of the 23-year-old EIR, including a current traffic analysis using VMT methodology as required by SB 743.

6. Require a Construction Traffic Management Plan approved by the City Engineer before any construction activity on Aguilar Road or Freeman Road.

7. Require formal, documented community outreach — not informal, unverifiable developer conversations — before this matter returns to the City Council.

8. Forward this letter to the City Attorney and retain it as formal notice of a dangerous condition under Government Code §835.2(a).

The Monument Springs Bridge was always intended as the critical infrastructure that would unlock the remaining phases of Granite Lakes Estates. The City Council understood this when it denied the same request in 2022. Nothing has changed — no sidewalks added, no curbs installed, no road widening performed, no traffic study completed. What has changed is that we now understand the problem is even larger than previously recognized: Aguilar Road will bear not only temporary construction traffic, but a permanent increase of hundreds of daily vehicle trips from 65 new households.

Build the bridge first. Improve Aguilar Road. Study the traffic impacts. Then allow construction to proceed. The safety of our neighborhood demands nothing less.

Thank you for your consideration. I plan to attend the February 17, 2026 hearing.

Respectfully,

Sincerely,
Anthony D. Sutter
5933 Green Mountain Ln
Rocklin, CA 95677
cc (via email):

David Mohlenbrok, Director of Community Development — [email protected] Arwen Wacht, Planning Manager — [email protected] Nathan Anderson, Principal Planner — [email protected] Commissioner Jared Thomas — [email protected]
Commissioner Gregg McKenzie — [email protected] Commissioner Twiana Armstrong — [email protected] Commissioner Roberto Cortez — [email protected] Commissioner Michael Barron — [email protected] City of Rocklin City Attorney’s Office
164
From: Merlyn Van Regenmorter
To: Nathan Anderson
Subject: Granite Lakes Development Agreement (DA2024-0001) proposal Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2026 12:17:14 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Mr. Anderson.

I am writing in regard to the Planning Commission hearing to be held on Tuesday, March 17 regarding the Granite Lakes Development Agreement (DA2024-0001). I live about two blocks away from the proposed developments.

I would like to express my extreme disapproval with this proposal that would allow the clearing of building sites and construction of any residences prior to, or concurrently with the construction of the Monument Springs Bridge.

The company has already demonstrated a failure to abide by terms of agreements in the past and that they do not follow through with the requirements and stipulations mandated by the Planning Commission as prerequisites of those approvals. This developer in the original development agreement was supposed to pay for the bridge before starting their work, now they want to start the work first and not pay the bridge costs but rather have the city and taxpayers front it. It reminds me of a spoiled child who is told “no” by a parent, so they continue to ask and ask until the parent finally gives in.

The bridge and roadway improvements must be completed prior to allowing any more homes to be built in either project for a variety of reasons. The reasons that the Planning Commission mandated this in the past are all still valid.

This entire base of this existing neighborhood has extreme concerns about traffic in general, construction traffic, fire safety, and other issues. The reason for mandating that the bridge must be completed PRIOR to any construction or clearing of building sites was to specifically address all of these concerns. Eliminating this requirement would cause chaos, unnecessary disruption of the neighborhood and roadways, and greatly diminish the quality of life for those of us who purchased homes in this neighborhood based on the Planning Commission’s previous rulings.

There is also supposed to be significant open space for the community, yet the development will have a private park and access to the quarry pond and an HOA which prevents local access to this location that has had trailways and access for decades.

I urge you to please vote NO on this proposal in order to preserve the integrity of the decisions already made by the Commission and to minimize the substantial impact that will be thrust upon the entire nearby community of existing homes.

Thank you.

Dr. Merlyn Van Regenmorter
4431 Barrington Court
Rocklin, CA 95677
165
From: Vanessa Whitmore
To: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron
Subject: Opposition to Granite Lake Estates Concurrent Construction Request – Feb. 17 Planning Commission Meeting Date: Monday, February 16, 2026 9:06:49 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff,
My name is Vanessa Whitmore, and I reside on Brookshire Drive, one of the neighboring streets that would be directly impacted by the Granite Lake Estates proposal. I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the developer’s request to begin infrastructure construction concurrently with the Monument Springs Bridge project.

The bridge is not expected to be completed until the end of 2027. That would mean nearly two additional years of large construction vehicles, heavy equipment transport, dust, noise, and safety concerns affecting established neighborhoods which already have limited ingress/egress that cannot support such endeavors safely.

Beyond the inconvenience and infrastructure impacts, there are serious public safety concerns. In June 2025, our area experienced a fire that highlighted the limitations of our current road network. The fire was directly next to my home, and there is only one road in/out, which has been blocked before during storms or roadwork. This incident only served to demonstrate how vulnerable our neighborhood could be if emergency access were to be restricted. Adding heavy construction traffic and road obstructions before the bridge is completed would further compromise emergency response times and evacuation routes, placing residents at unacceptable risk.

The Rocklin x I-80 interchange work is planned for Oct 2026. This is a huge undertaking and will create additional strain. Our infrastructure on Aguilar dates back to before the area was incorporated as part of the City and simply cannot handle both of these projects happening at one time.

Furthermore, I have become aware that Andrew Katakis is a convicted felon for 166
real estate fraud:

Office of Public Affairs | Two Real Estate Investors Convicted for Roles in Bid- Rigging Conspiracy in San Joaquin County, Calif. Real Estate Foreclosure Auctions | United States Department of Justice
Is this someone you trust to make decisions that are in the best interest of our community? He has a demonstrated track record of unethical business dealings, and this bid to accelerate the construction timeline seems like a push to increase profit at the expense of commitments the City of Rocklin has made to our residents.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the intent of the original Development Agreement, prioritize public safety, and deny the request to allow concurrent construction.

Thank you for your time, service, and thoughtful consideration of the community’s concerns.

Sincerely,
Vanessa Whitmore
167
From: Andrew
To: Nathan Anderson
Cc: Aly Zimmermann; Nicholas G. Alexander ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Attention: Neighbors against allowing Granite Lakes Estates Building to Commence Prior to Monument Springs Bridge Completion
Date: Thursday, February 12, 2026 7:52:30 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

I will be sending out the below to all the people who are concerned. I spoke for some time with Jessica Rozek and I tried to further clarify what we are doing. I think the below is helpful for not only staff in the meeting but for the neighborhood and for planning to focus on.

Hope it works and thanks for all your hard work to date!

Dear Granite Lakes and Surrounding Neighbors,
We understand that several recent emails to the City express concern about “concurrent construction” and the belief that this request would newly allow infrastructure work to begin before the Monument Springs Bridge is completed. We want to respectfully clarify an important point: Granite Lakes already has the legal right— based on longstanding approvals dating back many years—to complete site work, roads, utilities, and lot improvements without the bridge being built. That is not what this Development Agreement changes, and it is not what is being requested.

The Development Agreement currently before the Planning Commission does not grant new rights to perform infrastructure work. It does not eliminate the safeguard tying residential occupancy to completion of the bridge. What it does allow is limited model home construction and coordinated timing so that bridge construction and project buildout can proceed as one organized effort instead of three separate construction phases.

From a purely logistical standpoint, the bridge cannot be constructed from only one side. It requires access, staging, and heavy equipment mobilization from both the Greenbrae side and the Granite Lakes side so the structure can meet in the middle.

Traffic associated with bridge construction therefore cannot be avoided or routed exclusively in one direction. Even if the bridge were required to be built first, heavy equipment and construction vehicles would still utilize the same surrounding streets during that phase.

If construction is required to occur sequentially, the impacts would unfold in three distinct phases:

1. Phase One – Bridge Construction (6+- months): Heavy equipment access from both sides.
168

2. Phase Two – Infrastructure Installation (approximately 6–8+- months): Roads, utilities, grading.

3. Phase Three – Home Construction (8-12+- months): Vertical construction activity (This is an estimated timeframe to build a house of which the models will start concurrently).

That approach stretches disruption across multiple years.

By contrast, coordinating infrastructure work with bridge construction consolidates the activity into a more defined and efficient window. The proposed schedule anticipates:

Site work and infrastructure: approximately 6–8 months
Bridge construction: approximately 6 months
Model homes beginning concurrent with bridge work
No residential occupancy (other than limited models) until the bridge is completed and accepted by the City
When treated as one cohesive infrastructure project, the total disruption period is shorter and more predictable. It avoids restarting heavy mobilization multiple times and reduces prolonged neighborhood impacts.

It is also important to reiterate that the City of Rocklin is now responsible for delivering the bridge. The City assumed that role in 2023, approved advancing funds, and is managing design and construction. The bridge is being financed through bonds associated with new development projects, meaning it is paid proportionally by the benefiting developments—not by existing residents. This change significantly reduces the uncertainty that existed in prior years when delivery depended solely on private development timing.

We recognize that past delays and prior extensions have created frustration and skepticism. That is understandable. Years of planning, financing coordination, design work, and public hearings have led to the Development Agreement now in front of the City. Our goal is to create a clear, enforceable framework with defined contingencies so that the bridge is built and the subdivision is finally completed in a structured, efficient manner.

We apologize if the recent agenda item caught anyone off guard. That was not our intention. We are reaching out directly because we want to engage constructively and address concerns before positions become entrenched. If there are specific ideas that would improve traffic management, construction phasing, or communication during the build, we are open to discussing them. If there is a better solution that accomplishes the same goals with fewer impacts, we are willing to evaluate it.

Our objective is not to disregard neighborhood concerns, but to implement what we believe is the most practical path that delivers the long-awaited bridge while minimizing prolonged disruption. We remain open to ideas, constructive conversation by all 169
impacted by this project.

Please feel free to reply directly or let us know if you would like to schedule a small group meeting to discuss further.

Sincerely,
Andrew B. K.

Granite Lakes Estates

From: Nathan Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:48 AM
To: Andrew <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Attention: Neighbors against allowing Granite Lakes Estates Building to Commence Prior to Monument Springs Bridge Completion

From: Megan Foulger <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:35 AM Cc: Ben Foulger <[email protected]> Subject: Attention: Neighbors against allowing Granite Lakes Estates Building to Commence Prior to Monu External sender <[email protected]>
Make sure you trust this sender before taking any actions.

From: Megan Foulger <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2026 10:35 AM
Cc: Ben Foulger <[email protected]>
Subject: Attention: Neighbors against allowing Granite Lakes Estates Building to Commence Prior to Monument Springs Bridge Completion

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff,

My name is Megan Foulger, and my husband, Ben Foulger, and I reside on Barrington Court, one of the neighboring streets that would be directly impacted by the Granite Lake Estates proposal. I am writing to respectfully express my strong opposition to the developer’s request to begin infrastructure construction concurrently with the Monument Springs Bridge project.

As you know, this request was previously denied by the City Council for good reason. The existing Development Agreement clearly ties development activity to completion of the bridge. Allowing grading, deforestation, road construction, and model home development to begin before the bridge is completed would shift years of heavy 170
construction traffic onto Aguilar and Freeman Roads — roads that were not designed or intended to handle that volume or type of use.

My primary concerns include:
• Significant traffic and safety impacts for families, children, pedestrians, and cyclists • Compromised emergency access and evacuation capacity, as demonstrated during the June 2025 fire
• Road deterioration and infrastructure strain
• Increased noise, dust, and environmental disruption
• The precedent of modifying previously established and relied-upon development conditions
Residents built their lives here with the understanding that the bridge would be completed before major development activity commenced. Approving this request would undermine that agreement and shift both the safety risks and the burden of construction impacts onto existing neighborhoods.

I respectfully urge you to uphold the intent of the original Development Agreement, prioritize public safety, and deny the request to allow concurrent construction.

Thank you for your time, service, and thoughtful consideration of the community’s concerns.
171

RE: Granite Lakes Estates – Development Agreement Proposal Good Evening Chair and Commissioners.

First, I want to thank the Planning Commission and City staff for the significant amount of work that has gone into this project over many years. I also want to acknowledge that many residents have taken the time to write letters and attend tonight’s meeting. It is clear that people care deeply about their neighborhood, and I respect that.

Before discussing the Development Agreement, I want to ask that everyone participating tonight approach this discussion with respect — toward one another, toward City staff, and toward the Commission. These issues have existed for decades, and none of the individuals currently involved created the circumstances that brought us here.

Granite Lakes Estates is not a new subdivision proposal. This community was approved many years ago and developed in phases. Phases One and Two are already built, and many residents in the surrounding area live in homes that were created as part of the same approved project.

What remains today is simply the final phase of that long-standing subdivision.

The Monument Springs Bridge has been a difficult issue for many years. Ownership changes, economic cycles, and other factors delayed construction long before I became involved. What matters now is that the City has taken major steps to finally deliver that bridge. The City has allocated funding, retained engineering firms, and is advancing design and permitting so the bridge can be constructed.

The Development Agreement before you tonight does not eliminate the bridge requirement. The bridge must still be completed before residential occupancy of the homes can occur, with the exception of a small number of model homes.

The question before the Commission is simply whether construction activities can be coordinated so that bridge construction and subdivision construction occur during the same general timeframe, rather than forcing the neighborhood to experience several separate construction phases over multiple years.

If the work were required to occur sequentially — bridge construction first, then infrastructure, then home construction — each phase would require separate mobilization of heavy equipment and extended disruption. Coordinating construction can actually shorten the overall duration of impacts on nearby streets.
172

I understand that many residents have concerns about traffic on Aguilar Road and surrounding streets. Those concerns are understandable and deserve thoughtful consideration. At the same time, this project has long-standing approvals, and infrastructure work on the site is already permitted under the existing entitlements.

My goal is not to ignore community concerns. About a year and a half ago I spoke with several residents who had previously contacted the City in order to better understand their perspectives.

Based on those conversations, I believed there might be common ground around minimizing prolonged construction disruption. If that outreach did not reach everyone or created confusion, I sincerely apologize.

What I hope we can do now is move this discussion toward constructive solutions.

If there are reasonable measures that can help address neighborhood concerns — such as construction traffic management, communication protocols with neighbors, or construction hour limitations — I am open to those ideas and willing to work with City staff and the community to implement them.

Ultimately, what we are trying to do is finish a project that has been in place for decades and finally deliver the Monument Springs Bridge that everyone has been waiting for.

Every resident in this room had the opportunity at some point to move into a home that was created through development. The families who may eventually live in the remaining homes deserve the same opportunity to become part of this community.

My hope is that we can work together — the City, the neighborhood, and the development team — to complete this long-approved project and do so in a way that respects both existing residents and future residents of Rocklin.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,
Andrew B. K.

Granite Lakes Dvp. Team
CEMG Inc.

173
From: Suzette Campbell
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Build the Bridge First
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 1:54:50 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello from Barrington Hills Dr.

I am reaching out to ask that you “build the bridge first”! It makes no sense to begin construction prior to building the bridge. We live here with our children and grandchildren.

Such construction would create an unsafe environment for the residents who call this neighborhood home
Suzette Campbell
916-416-7178
6204 Barrington Hills Dr
Rocklin, CA 95677
174
From: SARAH DOLLAR
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: 3/17/25 meeting
Date: Monday, March 16, 2026 3:53:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Build the bridge first, no permits should be issued to builders until bridge is 100% completed!!!
If the 65 homes get built and there is some delay with the bridge, we, the current residents and the future residents will be in danger if there is a fire...not enough road access to get away safely.

Thank you
175
From: Megan Foulger
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Build the Bridge First - Neighbors Against Concurrent Construction Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 3:39:16 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello,
As a resident of Barrington Court, I am seriously concerned about the recommedations made during the review by the planning commission to approve concurrent construction of 6 homes in Quarry Lakes Estates during the Monument Springs Bridge Build. The developer has suggested that the construction at the same time would be good for the neighborhood. This is categorically false. The bridge won't be completed until the end of 2027 (if at all) so all of his construction traffic will flow either down Aguilar or Foothill. This is unacceptable and not in line with what the Council approved 4 years ago.

I am seriously concerned that the city is overlooking important aspects of our safety and creating dangerous and overcrowded traffic in our neighborhood. Namely, our neighborhood experienced a fire in June 2025. We are grateful for the quick response of our city's fire department. However, the planning commission's review of this proposal did not address this concern. This area is already overcrowded and without a sufficient egress in the event of an emergency evacuation. I would like to address how the city plans to ensure our safety should there be a need to evacuate when there are TWO major construction projects utilizing our only egress to safety and likely significantly slowing an already impacted evacuation route.

Our safety should be the city's first priority. Minimizing construction dust and noise is a small price to pay to keep the safety of my family and my neighbors in the event of an emergency for an area that is a known fire risk, with 2 fires occurring in the area since 2020. I'm extremely disappointed that this proposal is being considered by the city given the background of this developer. I can't trust him and it's unfortunate that you all seem to.

In closing, I am strongly against permits being issued for this development until the bridge is completed and usable for the neighborhood and construction.

Megan Foulger
4410 Barrington Court
176
From: Nikki
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Granite Lake Estates Development
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2026 3:28:10 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello,
Before we develop the final phase of the Granite Lake Estates can we please:
- add private property, civic code section1008 and no e-bike/motor bikes signs behind the houses along the Boardman Canal
- connect the bike lane that parallel's the creek
- add continuous sidewalks from Aguilar to Rocklin Road Thanks for your consideration.
177
From: Nikki
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Granite Lake Estates Development
Date: Saturday, March 14, 2026 1:52:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello,
Part of what makes Rocklin a great place to live are the open, green spaces and wildlife they attract. We have a family of wild turkeys that live in a tree in the area to be developed for Granite Lake Estates. As we create new homes for families to move into that area, can you please have the development spare their tree and create green space around it to protect the turkey family? Thanks for your consideration.
178
From: Justin Rozek
To: Meeting Comments
Cc: Jessica Rozek; Carol Rubin
Subject: Planning Commission Hearing 3/17/2026
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 3:12:05 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello,
I have been a homeowner in the Granite Lake Estates for the last 12 years. Numerous times now the developer (Katakis) has tried to get the bridge built concurrently with the construction of 6 (or more most likely) homes. His rhetoric is that the construction at the same time would be good for the neighborhood. This is categorically false. The bridge won't be completed until the end of 2027 (if at all) so all of his construction traffic will flow either down Aguilar (bad idea) or Foothill (worse idea). This is unacceptable and not in line with what the Council approved 4 years ago.

We are not anti-growth or anti-new homes. We're anti the city not looking out for us and creating dangerous and overcrowded traffic in our neighborhood. This is a last ditch attempt by the developer to get approval so he can turn around and sell it to a developer. He has no cares about our community and only wants to sell off his poor investment decision per his own statements (he bought the land on the steps of the Auburn courthouse not knowing anything about the property). He's also a former felon who the city should not be working with whatsoever. His communication with the neighborhood is farcical as no one in the community has spoken with him in any regard. He's a charlatan trying to pull a fast one on the city that will make everything worse while he walks away.

In closing; no permits until the bridge is completed and usable for the neighborhood and construction. Period.

Justin Rozek
4200 Caribou Ct
179
From: Carol Rubin
To: Meeting Comments; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron; David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson
Cc: David Bass; Bill Halldin; Ken Broadway; Jill Gayaldo; Greg Janda Subject: Planning Commission Agenda Item 2A, March 17, 2026: Monument Springs Bridge Date: Friday, March 13, 2026 11:17:15 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello All,
The City has expedited the funding for the Bridge and has taken over construction (thank you!), but if the proposed DA is adopted it gives a great deal of leverage to the GLE2 developer:
“Notwithstanding Project Approvals requiring the extension of Monument Spring Drive and construction of Monument Springs Bridge before the 49th building permit, the Parties agree that the building permit for the 49th residential dwelling and all such subsequent building permits may be issued upon commencement of construction of the bridge foundations/abutments for the Monument Springs Drive Bridge. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, there shall be no restrictions on issuance of up to six (6) model home building permits and temporary certificates of occupancy therefor.”
The minute the bulldozer starts on the Bridge, the developer is guaranteed 6 (maybe 8) COs and 49 Building Permits without restrictions, while the language regarding Bridge construction in the staff report Is vague and intentional:
“The current construction schedule anticipates a spring 2027 construction start date, with an anticipated completion date approximately six months later.

If the project proceeds as planned, the bridge is expected to be fully operational by the end of 2027.”
When Bridge construction stalls, all the developer has to do is go to the City Council and claim that Bridge delays are not his fault and that he needs more COs or he will go into receivership and be forced to abandon the project. No one wants this, so the City Council will grant a few more COs and the process will repeat until the Bridge is finally finished or GLE 2 has been built out. This was exactly the scenario that got us into this mess 15 years ago, but this time the neighborhoods that will suffer include not just Aguilar Road properties, but all the homeowners who need access to Greenbrae Road to leave the area.

Extend the GLE2 Subdivision Map for 10 more years, but do not allow home construction until the Bridge is complete.

Carol Rubin
Aguilar Road
180
From: Margueritte Schneringer
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Build the Bridge First
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 2:08:31 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

My name is Margueritte Schneringer and I live at 6250 Brookshire Drive in Rocklin CA and I am advocating to build the bridge prior to erecting a new development in our area. We pay increased insurance premiums to live in a FIRE ZONE and with the greenbelt around us and a lack of roads leading out of these neighborhoods, it is JUST DANGEROUS. Please consider doing this ONE thing before you add more housing to this area!!!
Thank you.
181
From: Vicki Schwermann
To: David Mohlenbrok; Arwen Wacht; Nathan Anderson; Jared Thomas; Gregg McKenzie; Twiana Armstrong; Roberto Cortez; Michael Barron; Ken Broadway; David Bass; Jill Gayaldo; Bill Halldin; Greg Janda; Carol Rubin; Robert Schwermann
Subject: Monument Springs Bridge
Date: Thursday, March 12, 2026 4:33:03 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear City Council, Planning Staff, and Commissioners,
After the February meeting was canceled, I spoke with a neighbor about the Monument Springs Bridge. He said he had been told that the City has taken over the design and construction of the bridge and that construction would begin in about six months. That would certainly be welcome news.

However, I recall hearing something very similar back in 2023—that construction would begin in about six months at that time. I was even asked not to share that information. Now it is 2026 and the bridge has still not been built.

With that in mind, I was surprised to receive an email from Andrew just prior to the canceled meeting outlining a proposed construction sequence.

His email suggests development activity beginning before the bridge is completed, which appears to conflict with what many of us have previously been told by City representatives and project contacts. His entire letter is below
He stated that the current proposed plan is:
• Site work and infrastructure: approximately 6–8 months • Bridge construction: approximately 6 months
• Model homes beginning concurrent with bridge work
• No residential occupancy (other than limited models) until the bridge is completed
Over the past several years I have spoken with what I believe are all of Andrew’s listed contacts, and not one indicated they would consider 182
allowing construction to begin before the bridge is completed. The reason is obvious: the bridge represents critical access for the area.

Community concern about this issue has been very clear. I gathered 119 signatures several years ago and another 50 just last month from neighbors who share these concerns. I would prefer not to have to gather additional signatures or mobilize neighbors to attend future meetings on this issue.

If the City is now responsible for planning and funding the bridge, the question seems straightforward: why is the bridge not being built now so that it is completed before any development begins?
Equally important are the public safety implications. The bridge represents the primary emergency access for this area. Proceeding with site work, construction traffic, or development activity before that access is completed raises obvious concerns regarding fire response, medical access, evacuation routes, and overall public safety. Given California’s recent wildfire history, it is difficult to understand how development activity would be considered before the bridge is built and operational.

Ensuring that adequate emergency access is in place before development occurs is also a fundamental planning and environmental review consideration in California. For that reason, the sequencing of infrastructure and development is not simply a scheduling matter—it is directly tied to public safety and responsible planning.

I would appreciate clarification on the City’s timeline and intentions regarding construction of the Monument Springs Bridge.

Many neighbors are following this issue closely, and we look forward to seeing the City prioritize safety and responsible infrastructure planning as this project moves forward.

Sincerely,
Victoria Schwermann
On Tuesday, February 17, 2026, 9:43 AM, Andrew <discovery@gd- ltd.com> wrote:

183
Dear Granite Lakes and Surrounding Neighbors,
We would like to respectfully clarify several points
that appear to have caused understandable concern.

At no time did we state that we met with all
surrounding residents. More than a year ago, we spoke
with a small number of neighbors, for whom we had
contact information from the prior meeting over a year
ago, to informally discuss the project and hear initial thoughts. Those conversations were courteous and
constructive. We did not represent those discussions as reflecting the views of the entire neighborhood, nor
was it our intention to suggest broad consensus. If any prior communication created confusion on that point,
we sincerely apologize.

We also understand that recent emails to the City
express concern that “concurrent construction” would
newly allow infrastructure work to begin before the
Monument Springs Bridge is completed. It is important
to clarify that Granite Lakes already has longstanding
entitlements that permit site work, roads, utilities, and lot improvements independent of bridge completion.

The Development Agreement before the Planning
Commission does not create new infrastructure rights,
nor does it remove the requirement that the bridge be
completed and accepted by the City prior to residential occupancy (other than limited model homes).

What the agreement does allow is coordination —
enabling bridge construction, infrastructure
installation, and limited model construction to proceed in an organized manner rather than in three separate,
extended phases.

From a logistical standpoint, the bridge cannot be
constructed from only one side. It requires access,
staging, and heavy equipment mobilization from both
the Greenbrae and Granite Lakes sides so the structure
can meet in the middle. Even if the bridge were
required to be built first, heavy construction traffic
would still utilize surrounding streets during that
phase.

If construction were strictly sequential, impacts would likely occur over multiple years:

Bridge construction (approximately 6 months)
Infrastructure installation (approximately 6–8
months)
184
Vertical home construction (approximately 8–12
months)
By coordinating these efforts, the disruption is
consolidated into a shorter, more predictable
timeframe:

Site work and infrastructure: approximately 6–8
months
Bridge construction: approximately 6 months
Model homes beginning concurrent with bridge
work
No residential occupancy (other than limited
models) until the bridge is completed
This approach avoids repeated mobilization of heavy
equipment and reduces prolonged neighborhood
disruption.

It is also important to note that the City of Rocklin
assumed responsibility for delivering the bridge in
2023, approved advancing funds, and is managing its
design and construction. The bridge is financed
through bonds associated with new development
projects, meaning costs are allocated proportionally to benefiting developments rather than existing residents.

This significantly reduces the uncertainty that existed in prior years.

We recognize that past delays have created frustration
and skepticism. That is understandable. Our objective
is not to disregard public safety concerns or
neighborhood input, but to implement what we believe
is the most practical and enforceable path to finally
deliver the long-awaited bridge while minimizing
extended disruption.

We are not seeking conflict. We are open — and
remain open — to constructive dialogue. If there are
specific traffic management measures, construction-
hour limitations, communication protocols, or
oversight mechanisms that would provide additional
reassurance, we welcome those discussions.

We hope the upcoming meeting remains respectful and
solution-oriented. Please feel free to reach out directly or let us know if you would like to schedule a small
group discussion in advance.

Thank you for taking the time to engage.
185
Sincerely,
Andrew B. K.

Granite Lakes Estates
800-276-5020

186
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 1
Anthony D. Sutter, P.E.

Green Mountain Lane, Rocklin, California 95677
California Licensed Professional Engineer

March 16, 2026
City of Rocklin Planning Commission
c/o Nathan Anderson, Principal Planner
3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, California 95677
CC: City Council; City Attorney; City Manager
Via: Certified Mail and Electronic Delivery

RE: Development Agreement DA2024-0001
Granite Lakes Estates — March 17, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing

Chair and Members of the Planning Commission:

This letter and the attached exhibits present my analysis of DA2024-0001 and its impact on Aguilar Road. I am a California licensed professional engineer and a resident of Rocklin. I respectfully request three conditions:
1 BUILD THE BRIDGE FIRST
The Monument Springs Bridge and Drive shall be 100% complete, open to traffic, and accepted by the City before any construction activity begins on the Granite Lakes Estates subdivision.

2 BRING AGUILAR ROAD UP TO CITY STANDARDS
Continuous sidewalks on both sides, curb, gutter, pavement widening, street lighting, and ADA- compliant pedestrian facilities. Developer-funded per Government Code §66462.5, with fair market value compensation to any affected property owner.

3 INDEPENDENT TRAFFIC STUDY
A professional traffic impact study analyzing construction-phase trip generation, daily heavy truck counts, and pedestrian safety on Aguilar Road—chosen and contracted by the City, not the developer.

187
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 2
PERMANENT IMPACT: 618 DAILY TRIPS REGARDLESS OF

THE BRIDGE
SEE EXHIBIT 1: DISTANCE & TURNS

I measured both routes from the subdivision entrance to the Rocklin Road/I-80 interchange. The Aguilar Road route is shorter and more direct. The majority of the subdivision’s 618 permanent daily trips will use Aguilar Road.

3,640 FT
Aguilar Road Route
4,010 FT
Monument Springs Route
370 FT / 2 TURNS
Difference

Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual (Land Use 210, 9.52 trips per dwelling unit × 65 homes), the subdivision will generate approximately 618 daily vehicle trips. With Aguilar Road as the shorter route by 370 feet and requiring only one turn versus three, the majority of daily commute traffic will use Aguilar Road permanently.

618
Permanent Daily Trips
~400 / DAY
Est. on Aguilar Road (~65%)
~215 / DAY
Est. on Monument Springs (~35%)

The bridge satisfies the Fire Code’s two-access requirement (Appendix D, Section D107.1). The bridge does not meaningfully reduce daily traffic on Aguilar Road. Aguilar Road improvements— sidewalks, curb, gutter, widening, street lighting—are the mitigation that addresses this permanent impact.

188
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 3
AGUILAR ROAD: ROAD WIDTH
SEE EXHIBIT 2: ROAD WIDTH

49%
Of Roadway Has Deficient Width
20 FT
Minimum Width (Fire Code Min.)
34 FT CURB-TO-
CURB
City Standard (42-ft ROW)

SECTION LENGTH REQUIRED PROVIDED DEFICIENCY
0–246 246 ft 24 ft 27 ft 0
246–386 140 ft 24 ft 20–21 ft 3–4 ft
386–1086 700 ft 24 ft 25 ft 0
1086–1994 908 ft 24 ft 21–22.7 ft 1.3–4 ft
1994–2220 226 ft 24 ft 23.8–43.3 ft 0–0.2
2220–2600 380 ft 24 ft 54 ft 0

At 20 feet, Aguilar Road is exactly the bare minimum required by the City’s adopted California Fire Code, Section 503.2.1, for fire apparatus access. Any obstruction in the roadway—a trash can on collection day, a parked vehicle, a pedestrian, a school bus stopped for loading—reduces the effective width below the fire code minimum. There is zero margin for error.

The Granite Lakes Estates subdivision’s own internal streets require a 46-foot-wide right-of-way (Resolution 2022-127, Condition 6(a)(3)(iv)). Aguilar Road—the only access during construction— has a right-of-way as narrow as 20 feet.

189
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 4
AGUILAR ROAD: SIGHT DISTANCE
SEE EXHIBIT 3: SIGHT DISTANCE

AASHTO requires 280 feet of intersection sight distance for a left turn at 25 mph (Table 9-7). Two intersections on Aguilar Road fail this standard:

INTERSECTION REQUIRED PROVIDED DEFICIENCY
Gray Lodge Loop 280 ft 120 ft 160 ft (57% short)
Sycamore Drive 280 ft 50 ft 230 ft (82% short)

At Sycamore Drive, the available sight distance is 50 feet—less than one-fifth of what AASHTO requires. A driver pulling onto Aguilar Road from Sycamore can see oncoming traffic for approximately one second at 25 mph.

City police collision data confirms the danger. Two of seven documented crashes on Aguilar Road (29%) involved CVC §22106—unsafe starting or backing on a highway—at the Gray Lodge Loop and China Garden Road intersections. This violation occurs when a driver enters the roadway without adequate sight distance to detect oncoming traffic.

AASHTO stopping sight distance at 25 mph is 155 feet (Green Book, Table 3-1). AASHTO intersection sight distance for right turns at 25 mph is 240 feet (Table 9-7). Both intersections fail all three standards.

190
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 5
AGUILAR ROAD: SIDEWALKS
SEE EXHIBIT 4: SIDEWALKS

89%
East Side Missing Sidewalk
68%
West Side Missing Sidewalk
80%
Total Sidewalk Deficiency

SIDE PROVIDED REQUIRED DEFICIENCY DEFICIENCY %
East Side 237 ft 2,223 ft 1,986 ft 89%
West Side 700 ft 2,223 ft 1,523 ft 68%
TOTAL 937 ft 4,446 ft 3,509 ft 80%

Aguilar Road has no white stripe and no shoulder. Pedestrians—children, seniors, dog walkers, cyclists—walk in the travel lanes. There is nowhere else for them to go.

FHWA found that roads without sidewalks have more than twice the pedestrian crash risk of roads with sidewalks (Knoblauch et al., FHWA/RD-87/038). McMahon et al. (FHWA-RD-01-101) found sidewalks reduce crash-site probability by 88.2%. The Governors Highway Safety Association reports that approximately 65% of all U.S. pedestrian fatalities occur in locations without sidewalks (2023 NHTSA FARS data).

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (December 2024) found that at 25 mph, a pedestrian struck by a pickup truck faces a 62% chance of serious injury versus 30% for a standard car.

Construction vehicles—concrete mixers, dump trucks, graders—routinely exceed 40-inch hood heights and weigh 30,000–80,000 pounds.

191
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 6
AGUILAR ROAD: OVERHEAD UTILITIES & STREET

LIGHTING
SEE EXHIBIT 5: POWER POLES
SEE EXHIBIT 7: STREET LIGHTS

19 Overhead Line Crossings
15 FT
Lowest Clearance (CPUC Req: 25 ft)
11 Street Lights (16–18 Required)

The 15-foot overhead clearance is below the CPUC General Order 95, Rule 37 minimum of 25 feet for 12kV distribution lines over urban roadways. Construction vehicles and equipment trailers may exceed 15 feet in height.

METRIC REQUIRED PROVIDED STATUS
Street Lights 16–18 11 DEFICIENT
Light Spacing 150–175 ft 260 ft DEFICIENT
Overhead Clearance 25 ft (CPUC GO 95) 15 ft (lowest) VIOLATION

Rocklin’s November 2016 Improvement Standards require LED street lights on dedicated steel or aluminum poles with underground wiring, compliant with IES RP-8. Aguilar Road’s existing lights are legacy fixtures mounted on wooden utility poles with overhead wiring—none meet the current standard.

192
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 7
AGUILAR ROAD: DAILY HAZARDS
SEE EXHIBIT 6: HAZARDS

On any given day, the effective travel width of Aguilar Road is further reduced by routine obstructions:

GARBAGE COLLECTION DAYS
Trash cans placed at the road edge reduce the
already-narrow 20-foot travel way. Two vehicles
cannot pass in opposite directions when cans are
present. Vehicle mirrors are regularly found on the
ground after trash day.

SCHOOL BUS LOADING
School buses stop for loading on Aguilar Road.

When a bus stops, opposing traffic must also stop
(CVC §22454). A 40-foot bus occupies the full
travel lane. Pedestrians—including children
walking to and from the bus stop—share the travel
lane with vehicles.

Current heavy truck traffic on Aguilar Road is essentially zero—an occasional garbage truck and school buses. Under DA2024-0001 as proposed, heavy construction vehicles (concrete mixers, dump trucks, graders, excavators on flatbed trailers) would share this road with pedestrians, school buses, and garbage collection for seven to twelve months.

193
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 8
AGUILAR ROAD: DOCUMENTED CRASH HISTORY
SEE EXHIBIT 8: ACCIDENTS

7 Crashes (2019–2025)
29%
Caused by Sight Distance (CVC
§22106)
1 Pedestrian Encounters

# DATE LOCATION TYPE CITATION
1 11/19/2019 China Garden/Aguilar Vehicle-vehicle CVC §22350 (Speed) 2 06/01/2020 5555 Aguilar Rd Vehicle-object —
3 02/03/2021 5500 Aguilar Rd Vehicle collision CVC §23152(f) (DUI) 4 09/21/2021 Gray Lodge/Aguilar Vehicle-vehicle CVC §22106 (Sight Dist.) 5 08/03/2023 Rocklin Rd/Aguilar Vehicle-vehicle CVC §21453(a) (Red Light) 6 03/10/2024 China Garden/Aguilar Vehicle-vehicle CVC §22106 (Sight Dist.) 7 01/03/2025 Arrowhead/Aguilar Vehicle-object CVC §22107 (Unsafe Turn)

Additionally, City calls-for-service records document: a motor vehicle/pedestrian encounter (September 16, 2023); and two motor vehicle accidents with injuries (September 7, 2021 at Rocklin Rd/Aguilar and December 1, 2021 at China Garden/Aguilar). These incidents occurred with essentially zero heavy truck traffic.

194
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 9
POST-DEVELOPMENT: IMPACT VS. INVESTMENT
SEE EXHIBIT 9: POST-DEVELOPMENT IMPACT VS. INVESTMENT

ROUTE ADDITIONAL TRIPS/YEAR INVESTMENT
Monument Springs 68,000 – 90,000 $20,000,000
Aguilar Road 135,000 – 158,000 $0

$20,000,000
Invested in Monument Springs
$0
Invested in Aguilar Road

The $51 million project budget includes $20 million in public bond/Mello-Roos financing for the Monument Springs Bridge and Drive extension. Aguilar Road—which will carry nearly twice as many annual trips as Monument Springs—receives zero dollars in improvements.

Funding source: CMFA Community Facilities District No. 2022-4, authorized bond amount $23.4 million. This is public financing ultimately paid by Granite Lakes Estates homeowners through special tax assessments.

195
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 10
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC: TWO SCENARIOS
SEE EXHIBIT 10: DEVELOPER’S PLAN
SEE EXHIBIT 11: PUBLIC SAFETY PLAN

DA2024-0001 AS PROPOSED REQUESTED: BRIDGE FIRST
Subdivision construction
on Aguilar Rd
~7–12 months 0 days
Bridge construction on
Aguilar Rd
~7–12 months ~7–12 months
Est. subdivision trips on
Aguilar
~11,000 – 26,000+ 0
Est. bridge-only trips on
Aguilar
~3,000 – 9,000 ~3,000 – 9,000
TOTAL est. construction
trips
~14,000 – 35,000+ ~3,000 – 9,000
AVOIDABLE trips
(difference)
11,000 – 26,000+ 0 additional
Est. peak daily trips on
Aguilar
150 – 350+ / day 20 – 90 / day
Quarry grading/haul trucks 100 – 250+ / day None
Second fire access during
construction
Not available Available (bridge complete)
Total project cost $51 million $51 million
Aguilar Rd improvements
included
$0 $0

The project cost is identical under either approach. The developer saves approximately eight months of project timeline. The residents of Aguilar Road absorb seven to twelve months of the heaviest construction traffic on a road with 80% sidewalk deficiency.

196
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 11
WHAT DA2024-0001 DOES TO EXISTING PROTECTIONS

PROTECTION RESOLUTION 2022-127 DA2024-0001
Building Permit Cap 48 permits until bridge is
complete and open (Condition
19d)
All 65 permits once bridge
foundations are poured (Section

8.1)
Occupancy Restriction Bridge complete before 49th
permit
No occupancy of 49th unit until
Notice of Completion (Section

8.2)
Aguilar Road Traffic Condition 19c redirects traffic
after bridge complete
No protection during construction.

Condition 19c only applies after
bridge is finished.

CITY STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL

Staff’s February 2025 comments state: the City Council, at its May 21, 2022 meeting, “directed staff to maintain the existing building permit cap at 48 until the bridge and all necessary road improvements were completed” due to “concerns about increased traffic on Aguilar Road and fire safety.”

Staff further states: “Staff has received no indication from the City Council or City Manager that the original 2022 directive should be revised.”

The applicant originally proposed eliminating all occupancy restrictions. Staff rejected that proposal.

197
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 12

NOTICE OF KNOWN DANGEROUS CONDITION

This letter constitutes formal notice under Government Code Section 835. The following facts are now part of the record:

The City owns Aguilar Road (2016 Greenbrae Island annexation, LAFCo #2015-04; Placer County Resolution 2017-073; Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement).

The City knows 49% of Aguilar Road has no sidewalk and pedestrians walk in the travel lanes.

The City knows the road is 20 feet wide at its narrowest—exactly the California Fire Code minimum (Section 503.2.1)—with zero margin for any obstruction.

City police records document seven vehicle collisions and a motor vehicle/pedestrian encounter on Aguilar Road since 2019, with essentially zero heavy truck traffic present.

The City Council, at its May 21, 2022 meeting, specifically directed staff to maintain the 48 -building- permit cap on Granite Lakes Estates due to concerns about increased traffic on Aguilar Road and fire safety.

The City has received this letter, the Katakis correspondence, and three CPRA requests documenting these conditions.

Resolution 2022-127, Section 1.I, contains the City’s finding that “the design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems.” That finding was made under Government Code Section 66474(f) when the only access to the subdivision was Aguilar Road and the building permit cap of 48 was in place. DA2024-0001 proposes to remove the building permit cap while the bridge remains incomplete. The factual basis for the Section 1.I finding no longer holds if 65 homes can be permitted and constructed while 11,000 to 26,000 or more heavy construction vehicle trips are routed onto Aguilar Road.

Design immunity under Government Code Section 830.6 is likely unavailable—Rocklin did not design Aguilar Road; Placer County did. Even if it attached, Baldwin v. State of California (1972) 6 Cal.3d 424 holds that design immunity is lost when changed conditions make the original design dangerous. Approving 65 homes and their construction traffic creates those changed conditions.

If a pedestrian is struck on Aguilar Road during construction, the evidentiary trail leads to this approval.

198
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 13

SUPPORTING LEGAL AUTHORITY

Subdivision Map Act
Gov. Code §66474(f)
Mandatory denial when subdivision design is likely to cause serious public health problems. §66462.5 authorizes the City to require the developer to pay all costs of off-site right-of-way acquisition, with existing property owners receiving fair market value compensation.

CEQA
Guidelines §15162
The 2002 EIR was prepared by the City of Rocklin as lead agency. The 2016 annexation brought Aguilar Road into City jurisdiction, changing applicable road standards. The 2022 Addendum did not analyze Aguilar Road under City fire code or pedestrian safety standards. Supplemental review is warranted.

ADA, 28 CFR 35.150 Barden v. City of Sacramento (2002) 292 F.3d 1073—public sidewalks are a City program under Title II. Approving 65 homes on a road with no accessible pedestrian route raises program-access concerns.

Complete Streets Act
Gov. Code §65302(b)(2)
Rocklin’s Circulation Element never evaluated Aguilar Road under Complete Streets. Approving pedestrian-generating development on a road with zero multimodal facilities is inconsistent.

General Plan Consistency
Gov. Code §65867.5
Aguilar Road meets none of Rocklin’s adopted road standards (November 2016: 42-ft ROW minimum, curb, gutter, sidewalks, white stripe, 4-ft bike lanes required).

CONCLUSION: THREE OPTIONS

1 Require the Monument Springs Bridge and Monument Springs Drive to be 100% complete before any construction begins on Granite Lakes Estates.

2 Bring Aguilar Road up to City standards as a condition of approval—curb, gutter, sidewalks on both sides, widening, bike lanes, white stripe, undergrounding overhead utilities, street lights—with the developer funding all improvement and right-of-way acquisition costs pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, and with full fair market value compensation to any affected property owner.

3 Approve DA2024-0001 as proposed—and accept the liability that comes with routing 11,000 to 26,000 or more heavy construction vehicle trips onto a road with no sidewalks where pedestrians walk in the travel lane.

I request that this letter and all enclosures be made part of the public record for DA2024-0001.

Respectfully submitted,

Anthony D. Sutter, P.E.
199
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 14
California Licensed Professional Engineer
Resident, Green Mountain Lane, Rocklin, CA

200
Sutter — DA2024-0001 — Page 15

ENCLOSURES

1 Exhibits 1–11: Aguilar Road Field Measurement Data, Photographs, Route Comparison, and Construction Traffic Analysis
2 Construction Schedule Comparison and Trip Estimates (Spreadsheet) 3 Pedestrian Safety Research Summary
4 Construction Cost Estimate
5 City of Rocklin Police Collision Data, Aguilar Road (2019–2025) 6 City of Rocklin Calls for Service, Aguilar Road (2020–2026) 7 City Staff Comments on DA2024-0001 (February 2025)
8 Resolution 2022-127 with Conditions of Approval
9 Placer County Resolution No. 2017-073
10 Greenbrae Island Tax Revenue Sharing Agreement
11 Greenbrae Annexation Area Map (City of Rocklin)
12 CPRA Requests (3)—Certified Mail Receipts

201
4010 FT3 TURNS3640 FT1 TURNPROJECTTURNTURNTURNTURNEXHIBIT 1DISTANCE & TURNSROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARHWY 80 AGUILAR: 3640 FT 1MONUMENT SPRINGS: 4010 FT 3 ROUTE:DISTANCETURNSINCREASE TOTAL 370 FT2 202

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD

SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDEN
0 TO ROAD WIDTH27 FT
EXHIBIT 2ROAD WIDTH
ROAD WIDTH 20 TO21 FTROAD WIDTH 21 TO22.7 FTROAD WIDTH 23.8TO 43.3 FTROAD WIDTH 25 FTROAD WIDTH 54 FT.SECTIONREQUIREDPROVIDED0-2462427WIDTHWIDTHFT0DEFICIENCY246-3862420-213-4386-1086242501086-19942421 TO 22.71.3 TO 41994-22202423.8 TO 43.30.2 TO 02220-260024540FT246LENGTH140700908226380FTFTTOTAL ROADWAY WITH DEFICIENT WIDTH: 1274 FT: 49% NOTE: 1. REQUIRED WIDTH IS TWO 12' WIDE LANES2. ROCKLIN'S STANDARD IS 34 FT CURB-TO-CURB FOR A 42-FTROW RESIDENTIAL STREET 203

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 3SIGHT DISTANCESIGHT DISTANCE120 FTSIGHT DISTANCE50 FT SECTIONREQUIREDPROVIDEDSYCAMORE280120DISTANCEDISTANCEFT160DEFICIENCYGRAY LODGE28050230FTFTSIGHT DISTANCENOTES: FOR A 25 MPH ROAD, AASHTO REQUIRES:1. STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE: 155 FT (AASHTO GREEN BOOK, TABLE 3-1)2. INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT TURN): 280 FT (AASHTO TABLE 9-7, FOR 25 MPH DESIGN SPEED)3. INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT TURN): 240 FT (AASHTO TABLE 9-7) 204

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 4SIDEWALKS SIDEWALK 237'EAST SIDE ONLYSIDEWALK 700'WEST SIDE ONLYTOTAL DISTANCE: 2223 FTSECTIONREQUIREDPROVIDEDEAST SIDE2372223WIDTHWIDTHFT1986DEFICIENCYWEST SIDE70022231523TOTAL93744463509FTFT%89%DEFICIENCY68%80%SIDEWALKS 205

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 5POWER POLESPOWER POLESIN SIDEWALKOVERHEAD LINES:19 OVERHEADCROSSINGS.SOME AS LOW AS15 FT ABOVEROADWAY.

NOTE: THE 15-FTOVERHEAD CLEARANCEIS BELOW CPUC GO 95RULE 37 MINIMUM OF 25FT FOR 12KVDISTRIBUTION LINESOVER URBAN ROADWAYS. 206

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 6HAZARDSSCHOOL BUSGARBAGE CANS 207

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 7STREET LIGHTS11 STREETLIGHTS TOTAL.2600 FT TOTALLENGTHSTREET LIGHTINGREQUIREDPROVIDEDLIGHTS150-175260 SUBSTANDARD,LEGACY STREET LIGHTSPACING SPACINGREQUIREDPROVIDED16-1811FTFT 208

GREENBRAEAGUILARROCKLIN RD
SYCAMOREBROOKSHIREARROWHEADGRAY LODGECHINAGARDENEXHIBIT 8ACCIDENTS34121. AT CHINA GARDEN/AGUILAR (TOP OF MAP):DATE: 11/19/2019 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-VEHICLECOLLISION. CVC §22350 (UNSAFE SPEED). NO INJURIES.DATE: 03/10/2024 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-VEHICLECOLLISION. CVC §22106 (UNSAFE STARTING/BACKING —SIGHT DISTANCE). NO INJURIES.2. BETWEEN CHINA GARDEN AND GRAY LODGE:DATE: 06/01/2020 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-OBJECTCOLLISION AT 5555 AGUILAR RD. NO INJURIES.DATE: 02/03/2021 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE COLLISION AT5500 AGUILAR RD. DUI (CVC §23152(F)). HIT AND RUN. NOINJURIES.3. AT GRAY LODGE/AGUILAR:DATE: 09/21/2021 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-VEHICLECOLLISION. CVC §22106 (UNSAFE STARTING/BACKING —SIGHT DISTANCE). NO INJURIES.4. AT ARROWHEAD/AGUILAR:DATE: 01/03/2025 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-OBJECTCOLLISION. CVC §22107 (UNSAFE TURN). NO INJURIES.5. BETWEEN BROOKSHIRE AND SYCAMORE:DATE: 09/16/2023 | INCIDENT: MOTORVEHICLE/PEDESTRIAN ENCOUNTER (CFS DISPATCH).6. AT ROCKLIN RD/AGUILAR (TOP OF MAP)DATE: 08/03/2023 | INCIDENT: VEHICLE-VEHICLECOLLISION. CVC §21453(A) (RED LIGHT). 1 MINORINJURY.7. ADDITIONAL CFS ENTRIES (MVA WITH INJURIES):DATE: 09/07/2021 | INCIDENT: MVA WITH INJURIES.LOCATION: ROCKLIN RD/AGUILAR.DATE: 12/01/2021 | INCIDENT: MVA WITH INJURIES.LOCATION: CHINA GARDEN/AGUILAR.567 209
EXHIBIT 9POST-DEVELOPMENTIMPACT VS. INVESTMENT
AGUILAR: MONUMENT SPRINGS: ROUTE:TRIPS/YRINVESTMENTADDITIONAL135K TO158K TRIPS/ YEARPROJECT ROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARHWY 80 FUNDING SOURCE:PUBLIC: BOND/ MELLO-ROOSINVESTMENT:20,000,0000INVESTMENT:$0ADDITIONAL135K TO 158K$20,000,00068K TO 90K$0ADDITIONAL68K TO 90KTRIPS /YEAR 210
ROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARPHASE 1HWY 8014,000 – 35,000+TRIPS(ALL SUBDIVISION+ BRIDGECONSTRUCTIONTRAFFIC)~400 TRIPS/DAY~146,000TRIPS/YEAREXHIBIT 10DEVELOPER'S PLANPHASE 2~215 TRIPS/DAY~78,500TRIPS/YEAR3,000 – 9,000 TRIPS(BRIDGE CREWONLY)ROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARHWY 80 211
ROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARPHASE 1HWY 800 TRIPS(BRIDGECOMPLETEBEFORESUBDIVISIONCONSTRUCTION)EXHIBIT 11PUBLIC SAFETY PLANPHASE 23,000 – 9,000 TRIPS(BRIDGE CREWONLY)ROCKLIN RDCHINA GARDENGREENBRAEBRIDGEMONUMENTSPRINGSAGUILARHWY 80~400 TRIPS/DAY~146,000TRIPS/YEAR~215 TRIPS/DAY~78,500TRIPS/YEAR 212
GRANITE LAKES ESTATES — DA2024-0001
Construction Schedule: DA as Proposed vs. Requested Condition Prepared by Anthony D. Sutter, P.E. — March 2026
DA2024-0001 AS PROPOSED
Subdivision starts before
bridge is complete

REQUESTED CONDITION
Bridge shall be 100% complete
before subdivision work begins
How it works
Subdivision construction begins
while bridge is under construction.

All traffic uses Aguilar Rd
until bridge opens (~7–12 mo).

Bridge and MS Drive built first.

Then subdivision construction
accesses site via Monument Springs.

No subdivision traffic on Aguilar Rd.

Total project duration ~20–25 months ~28–33 months (+8 months) Total project cost $51 million $51 million (identical)

AGUILAR ROAD IMPACT
Subdivision construction
traffic on Aguilar Rd
~7–12 months
(heaviest phases: grading,
earthwork, tree removal, utilities)
0 days
Bridge construction
traffic on Aguilar Rd ~7–12 months ~7–12 months
(unavoidable — bridge crew access)
Est. total construction
trips on Aguilar Rd
~14,000 – 35,000+ (est.)
(subdivision + bridge combined)
~3,000 – 9,000
(bridge crew only, est.)
Est. peak daily trips
on Aguilar Rd
150 – 350+/day
(overlapping heavy phases)
20 – 90/day
(bridge crew only)
Heavy trucks/day on Aguilar
(haul, concrete, graders)
40 – 150+ trucks/day
during peak grading
5 – 30 trucks/day
(bridge materials only)
Pedestrians exposed to
subdivision construction traffic
(49% of Aguilar Rd has no sidewalk)
~7–12 months 0 months
All trip figures are engineering estimates (CalEEMod defaults, standard practice). A professional traffic study is requested to confirm. 213
Second fire access
during construction
Not available
(bridge incomplete)
Available
(bridge already open)
Aguilar Rd improvements
included in project $0 $0

AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION
Permanent daily trips
on Aguilar Rd
(ITE 9.52 × 65 DU = 618/day)
~618 trips/day ~618 trips/day (identical)
Sidewalks on Aguilar Rd Still none Still none
Current heavy truck traffic on Aguilar Rd: essentially zero (occasional garbage truck, school buses).

The developer saves ~8 months. Aguilar Road residents absorb 7–12 months of heavy construction traffic on a road missing 75% of its sidewalks. The cost is identical. 214

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE TRIPS
Construction Activity Est. Duration Est. Avg Daily
Trips (one-way)
Est. Peak Daily
Trips (one-way)
Heavy Truck
%
BEFORE BRIDGE OPENS (~7–12 months) — All traffic on Aguilar Rd Bridge construction ~130–250 days 20–60 50–90 25–40%
MS Road extension ~60 days 30–60 50–80 20–35%
GLE – Clear/grub/tree removal 25–55 days 30–60 60–80 30–50% GLE – Rough grading (quarry) 45–60 days 100–250+ 200–400+ 40–60% GLE – Underground utilities (start) ~30 days 40–70 80–100 15–25% Combined peak (overlapping) 30–60 days 150–350+ 300–500+ 30–50% AFTER BRIDGE OPENS (~13 months) — Traffic shifts to Monument Springs GLE – Utilities (remainder) ~30 days 40–70 80–100 15–25% GLE – Roads/curb/gutter 20–30 days 50–95 100–130 20–35% GLE – Pad grading (granite) 30–45 days 40–80 80–120 35–50% GLE – House construction (65) 250–390 days 60–100 120–150 10–20% Engineering estimates — CalEEMod v2022.1 defaults, standard practice, project-specific quarry conditions A professional traffic study shall be conducted to confirm these estimates.

AGUILAR RD TOTAL (DA as proposed, ~7–12 mo)
215
BRIDGE-ONLY TRIPS (both scenarios)
Bridge crew: ~20–60 avg/day × 22 working days/mo × 7–12 mo ≈ 3,080 – 15,840 trips Stated range: ~3,000 – 9,000 bridge-only trips (conservative midpoint).

AVOIDABLE TRIPS (difference between DA as proposed and requested condition) Under DA as proposed: 11,000 – 26,000+ ADDITIONAL subdivision construction trips on Aguilar Rd Under requested condition: 0 additional subdivision construction trips on Aguilar Rd High: ~170 avg/day × 22 working days/mo × 12 mo ≈ 44,880 trips Under requested condition (bridge first): ~3,000 – 9,000 trips (bridge crew only).

Low: ~75 avg/day × 22 working days/mo × 7 mo ≈ 11,550 trips Stated range: ~11,000 – 26,000+ one-way trips on Aguilar Rd (conservative; 12-month scenario could exceed 35,000).

Mid: ~120 avg/day × 22 working days/mo × 9 mo ≈ 23,760 trips 216
Route
(DA as proposed) Notes
AGUILAR RD City staff report: ~6 mo; evidence supports 12–18 mo (seasonal creek restrictions, $7.3M scope)

AGUILAR RD
AGUILAR RD Est. several hundred oak trees (arborist report needed for exact count)
AGUILAR RD Former quarry; 2–5× CalEEMod fill default
AGUILAR RD First ~30 days before bridge opens
AGUILAR RD Multiple activities simultaneous
MONUMENT SPRINGS Per Condition 19c, Reso. 2022-127

MONUMENT SPRINGS

MONUMENT SPRINGS
MONUMENT SPRINGS CalEEMod: 0.36 worker + 0.107 vendor/DU/day

217

218

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE COMPARISON
Activity Duration Route 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
DA2024-0001 AS PROPOSED
Bridge construction ~7–12 mo AGUILAR RD
MS Road extension ~4 mo AGUILAR RD
Bridge opens → traffic shifts —
GLE – Clear/grub/trees ~2 mo AGUILAR RD
GLE – Rough grading (quarry) ~3 mo AGUILAR RD
GLE – Underground utilities ~3 mo AGUILAR → MS
GLE – Roads/curb/gutter ~2 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Pad grading ~2 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Houses (65) ~12 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
AGUILAR RD: ~7–12 MONTHS then Monument Springs
REQUESTED CONDITION: BRIDGE COMPLETE FIRST
Bridge construction ~7–12 mo CHINA GARDEN RD
MS Road extension ~4 mo CHINA GARDEN RD
Bridge open / accepted ~1 mo —
GLE – Clear/grub/trees ~2 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Rough grading (quarry) ~3 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Underground utilities ~3 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Roads/curb/gutter ~2 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Pad grading ~2 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
GLE – Houses (65) ~12 mo MONUMENT SPRINGS
Durations are engineering estimates. Actual durations will vary. 219
AGUILAR RD: 0 DAYS SUBDIVISION TRAFFIC NONE
Red = traffic on Aguilar Rd
Green = traffic on Monument Springs / China Garden
Orange = bridge opens, traffic shifts
220
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

221
222

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
Engineering estimate for comparative purposes. Actual costs will vary.

Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Subtotal Days

MONUMENT SPRINGS ROAD & BRIDGE
MS-1 SWPPP / Erosion Control 0.8 AC $5,000 $4,000 5
MS-2 Clear and Grub 0.8 AC $8,000 $6,400 5
MS-3 Tree Removal 5.0 EA $2,500 $12,500 3
MS-4 Rough Grading 0.8 AC $50,000 $40,000 15
MS-5 Bridge Construction 1.0 LS $20,000,000 $20,000,000 130 MS-6 Asphalt Pavement 30,752.0 SF $10 $307,520 20
MS-7 Water Main 961.0 LF $149 $143,189 22
MS-8 Sanitary Sewer 961.0 LF $193 $185,473 22
MS-9 Gas Main 961.0 LF $55 $52,855 10
MS-10 Electric (Underground) 961.0 LF $75 $72,075 10
MS-11 Telephone/Cable 961.0 LF $40 $38,440 8
MS-12 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk 6,727.0 SF $12 $80,724 10
MS-13 Street Lighting 5.0 EA $8,500 $42,500 3
MS-14 Landscape/Erosion Repair 1.0 LS $25,000 $25,000 5 MONUMENT SPRINGS SUBTOTAL $21,010,676
GRANITE LAKES ESTATES (65 LOTS)
GLE-1 SWPPP / Erosion Control 24.5 AC $5,000 $122,500 10 GLE-2 Clear and Grub 24.5 AC $8,000 $196,000 25
GLE-3 Oak Tree Removal 1.0 LS $549,158 $549,158 30
GLE-4 Rough Grading 24.5 AC $50,000 $1,225,000 60
GLE-5 Sanitary Sewer 3,948.0 LF $193 $761,964 45
GLE-6 Storm Drain 3,949.0 LF $166 $655,534 38
GLE-7 Water Main 3,948.0 LF $149 $588,252 38
GLE-8 Gas Main 3,948.0 LF $55 $217,140 15
GLE-9 Electric (Underground) 3,948.0 LF $75 $296,100 15 GLE-10 Telephone/Cable 3,948.0 LF $40 $157,920 10
223
GLE-11 Asphalt Pavement 126,336.0 SF $10 $1,263,360 30
GLE-12 Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk 27,636.0 SF $12 $331,632 20 GLE-13 Street Lighting 22.0 EA $8,500 $187,000 5
GLE-14 Pad Grading (65 lots) 65.0 EA $8,750 $568,750 45 GLE-15 Landscape/Erosion Repair 1.0 LS $150,000 $150,000 15 GLE-16 House Construction (65) 65.0 EA $350,000 $22,750,000 260 GRANITE LAKES SUBTOTAL $30,020,310
TOTAL PROJECT COST $51,030,986
AGUILAR RD IMPROVEMENTS $0
224
Notes
Granite quarry
~6 months per staff report
32' wide
5,720 in @ $96/in
Former granite quarry
Rock trenching
Rock trenching
225
32' wide internal roads
Internal streets only
Granite substrate
~12 months
226
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY — ROADS WITHOUT SIDEWALKS
Finding Statistic Source
Crash risk: no sidewalk vs. sidewalk 2× higher FHWA/RD-87/038 Crash-site probability reduction with sidewalk 88.2% lower FHWA-RD-01-101 Crash rate per mile (no sidewalk) 3× higher Accident Analysis & Prevention (2021) U.S. pedestrian fatalities without sidewalk ~65% GHSA / 2023 NHTSA FARS Potential crash reduction from walkways Up to 88% FHWA-SA-10-022 Serious injury: pickup vs. car at 25 mph 62% vs. 30% IIHS (December 2024) Fatal injury: large truck vs. car 50% greater (OR=1.54) Desapriya et al. (2010) Death risk: light truck vs. car 2–3× higher Lefler & Gabler (2004) Hood height >40 in. and ped fatality ~45% more likely IIHS (2024) Work zone fatalities (2023) ~898 FHWA
Pedestrians killed in work zones (2023) 176 FHWA
Fatal work zone crashes on local roads (2022) 32 (doubled from 2021) FHWA 227
From: Jeanie Thurston
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Granite Lakes Estates Momument Springs Bridge
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 3:29:26 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Input for tonight's meeting; I live off Greenbrae in Rocklin and I would very much appreciate it if the planning commission would recommend that the bridge over Secret Ravine Creek off Monument Springs should be BUILT FIRST; before the new development is allowed to initiate construction. Thank you.

Jeanie Thurston
5820 Green Mountain Lane, Rocklin 95677
228
From: Susan Willson
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Granite Lakes Estates Public Hearing Item
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 1:37:19 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
I am writing as a resident of more than 20 years to express my deep concern, and equally strong expectation, that the City uphold its long-standing commitment regarding the construction of the bridge in our community.

For decades, residents like myself have been assured that improving access and safety through completion of this bridge is not optional, but essential. The City has repeatedly stated that further development would not proceed until this critical infrastructure is in place. That commitment has been a cornerstone of trust between the City and the people who live here.

However, what we have witnessed over time is a troubling pattern. As land changes hands, new developers attempt to bypass or reinterpret these commitments, seeking loopholes or relying on shifting circumstances to move projects forward without delivering on the bridge first. This not only undermines the integrity of the original agreement, but also places our community at continued risk due to inadequate access, increased congestion, and compromised safety.

I urge the Commission to remain steadfast and vigilant. The decisions before you are not just about individual development proposals, they are about honoring a promise made to an entire community. Allowing further development to proceed without completion of the bridge would set a dangerous precedent and erode public trust.

I am not opposed to thoughtful growth. But growth must be responsible, and it must be accompanied by the infrastructure necessary to support it. In this case, that means completing the bridge, without exception, without delay, and without compromise.

I respectfully ask that you continue to uphold this requirement in all current and future deliberations. Our community is counting on your leadership to ensure that commitments are kept and that safety remains a top priority.

Thank you for your time, your service, and your careful consideration.

Sincerely,
Susan Willson
229
From: Karen Batchelor
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: Granite Lake Estates/Monument Springs Bridge
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 5:12:01 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Planning Commission,
My name is Karen Batchelor. My husband and I live on Green Mountain Lane. We have lived here for 9 years. We have watched as two housing projects were completed off of Aguilar Road.

Now, as we see a third building project, we are very concerned about the safety of our neighborhood. This is, especially as the developers request to delay the completion of Monument Springs Bridge to be concurrent to the completion of the Granite Lakes Estates.

This will add increased traffic of vehicles and heavy equipment on our only outlet streets, wear and tear of our roads, concern for safety of our families who daily exercise and walk along Aguilar Road, Foothills Road and Greenbrae Road. As well as the concern for any possible fires in our area with only two outlet roads.

We request the Planning Commision require the completion of the Monument Springs Bridge as originally planned, prior to the start of the Granite Lakes Estates building project.

Respectfully,
Doug and Karen Batchelor
5900 Green Mountain Ln
230
From: Jim Clifford
To: Meeting Comments
Subject: On Bridge Issue
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2026 5:34:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Hello,
My opinion is the bridge should be built before any building permits are approved.

James Clifford
4443 Greenbrae Road
Rocklin
231

kimley‐horn.com 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814 916 858 5800

Memorandum

To: Justin Nartker, Director
Public Services Department
City of Rocklin
From: Matt Weir, P.E., T.E., PTOE
Re: Aguilar Road Evaluation
Safety Assessment
Date: September 25, 2019

The purpose of this memorandum is to document a technical evaluation of the existing condition of Aguilar Road, compare the current roadway configuration to past and current City/County standards, qualify its current level of safety, and provide recommendations to improve the level of safety.

Executive Summary
We understand that the City desired to conduct an evaluation of Aguilar Road in response to safety related concerns raised at the June 25, 2019, City Council Meeting. Aguilar Road was annexed by the City from Placer County, thereby creating this situation in which the City inherited a roadway that was designed and constructed (by others) using non‐City standards. As part of this assessment, we reviewed as‐built roadway improvement plans and conducted research of City, County, and other applicable design standards to evaluate whether the road was constructed in accordance to the governing design standards (presumably Placer County) at the time of construction, and how the existing facility compares to current (City) standards. We also collected traffic data and analyzed the roadway’s collision rate for the purpose of assessing the safety of its current operations.

The existing Aguilar Road has a daily traffic volume of approximately 1,500‐vehicles per day (between China Garden Road and Greenbrae Road) which is well within the anticipated volume range for this facility. In fact, the Institute of Transportation Engineers1 (ITE) notes a maximum volume of 3,000‐vehicles per day for “minor residential collectors” with houses fronting the street. While the existing prevailing speeds are 10‐mph higher than the posted speed limit (35 vs. 25‐mph), the facility’s 24‐year collision history equates to a collision rate that is approximately half the statewide average for similar facilities.

The posted speed limit of 25‐mph was confirmed to be appropriately applied according to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

The existing physical characteristics of Aguilar Road were determined to provide inadequate shoulder width, excessive cross‐slope, and a right‐of‐way that is too narrow when compared to the then‐current County (1972) design standards. Similarly, the existing facility does not satisfy the City’s current design standards for these critical cross‐sectional elements. If the 40‐foot standard right‐of‐way was applied to the corridor, it was determined that between 0.27‐ to 1.06‐acres of additional right‐of‐way would be required to achieve the standard configuration.

In an effort to reinforce the safety of Aguilar Road, the City should consider the following strategies:

 Where absent, consider adding a centerline stripe (dashed yellow) in an effort to narrow the perceived pavement width for the desired purpose of reducing the prevailing speeds.  Consider installing radar speed feedback signs, one in each direction, to further reinforce the posted speed limit and reduce the prevailing speeds.

1 Transportation and Land Development, ITE, 2002.
232

Aguilar Road Evaluation P a g e 2 o f 4
Safety Assessment September 25, 2019
Existing Conditions
Aguilar Road is a two‐lane, rural collector roadway that provides vital connectivity between Rocklin Road and Greenbrae Road. Along with Foothill Road via El Don Drive, these two facilities provide the only connectivity for this area of the City to Rocklin Road and the rest of the transportation network.

Volume, Speed, and Collision Data
Table 1 summarizes existing and historical Aguilar Road volumes, while Table 2 summarizes existing speed data. The posted speed limit along Aguilar Road is 25 mph. Existing volume and speed data collected in August 2019 are included as Appendix A to this memorandum.

Table 1 – Existing and Historical Aguilar Road Volume Data

Collection Date
North of China Garden Rd South of Arrowhead Dr
NB SB Total
(VPD) NB SB Total
(VPD)
August 2019 1,514 1,495 3,009 751 720 1,471
April 2018 1,535 1,500 3,035 ‐ ‐ ‐
September 2016 ‐ ‐ ‐ 840 799 1,639
Notes:

VPD = Vehicles per Day

Table 2 – Existing Aguilar Road Speed Data

Percentiles
Current
Posted
Speed Limit
North of
China Garden Rd
South of
Arrowhead Dr
NB SB NB SB
Average (MPH)
25 24 24 29 29
85th % (MPH) 28 28 35 35

As shown in Table 1, daily traffic on Aguilar Road north of China Garden Road has decreased from 3,035 in April 2018 to 3,009 in August 2019. Daily traffic on Aguilar Road south of Arrowhead Drive has also decreased, from 1,639 in September 2016 to 1,471 in August 2019. Speed data collected north of China Garden Road yielded an average speed of 24 mph and an 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. Speed data collected south of Arrowhead Drive yielded an average speed of 29 mph and an 85th percentile speed of 35 mph. As previously noted, the current posted speed limit is 25 mph.

Collisions along Aguilar Road within the last approximately 24 years were evaluated using data provided by the City dating back to 1995. Table 3 summarizes the collision rate of Aguilar Road compared to the statewide collision rate for similar roads.

Table 3 – Aguilar Road Collision History and Rates

Road Segment Total Collisions
in 24 years
Calculated
Collision Rate
(ACC/MVM)
Statewide
Rate*
(ACC/MVM)
China Garden Rd
to Greenbrae Rd 3 0.55 0.95
Notes:

ACC/MVM = Accidents per Million Vehicle Miles
* Per 2016 Collision Data on California State Highways, 2 AND 3 LN rural 233

Aguilar Road Evaluation P a g e 3 o f 4
Safety Assessment September 25, 2019
Aguilar Road from China Garden Road to Greenbrae Road has logged three collision in 24 years, yielding a collision rate of 0.55 ACC/MVM, while the statewide collision rate for a 2‐Lane rural roadway is 0.95 ACC/MVM.

Cross‐Section Elements
There are 23 driveways/access points along the entire stretch of the Aguilar Road. The majority of the corridor has limited signing and striping elements including speed limit signs, no‐parking signs, and temporary traffic control signs. Based on field observations and topographic survey information provided by the City, there are existing joint utility poles and private improvements (i.e., mail boxes, landscaping, decorative features, etc.) located directly adjacent to the existing edge of pavement.

The following is a summary of the various Aguilar Road segments’ cross‐section elements (see Exhibit 1):

 Rocklin Road to China Garden Road: This segment is compliant with current City standards for residential collectors and, therefore, was not included as a part of the evaluation.  China Garden Road to Sycamore Place: This segment consists of two 10‐ to 12‐foot travel lanes (not striped), within 32‐ to 40‐feet of apparent right‐of‐way (ROW). There are currently no shoulders on either side of the road.
 Sycamore Place to Greenbrae Road: This segment consists of two 13‐foot travel lanes (striped), curb and gutter, and a sidewalk along the eastern side of the segment within 50.5‐feet of apparent ROW. There is no sidewalk or shoulder on the western side of the road.

Design Standards Evaluation
We completed an evaluation to assess Aguilar Road’s physical characteristics compared to both prior (Placer County) and current (City of Rocklin) design standards. First, we considered whether or not the facility was compliant with the then‐current (1972) Placer County standards at the time of construction.

Second, we assessed the facility against the current City standards. Both typical cross‐sections, the County’s 1972 and the current City, are depicted in Exhibit 2. Table 4 summarizes the findings of this evaluation of Aguilar Road against these design standards.

Table 4 – Aguilar Road (China Garden Road to Sycamore Place) Cross‐Sectional Elements Evaluation

Cross‐Sectional Element
Existing
Condition
(per As‐
Builts)
County
Standard
(1972)
Consistent
with County
Standard
(1972)?
Current City
Standard
Consistent
with City
Standard?
Travel Lane (ft) 10 ‐ 12 9 Yes 12 No
Shoulder (Paved) (ft) 0 4 No 4 ‐ 6 No
Shoulder (Unpaved) (ft) 0 3 No
Cross‐Slope (%) 1 ‐ 5 2 No 2 No
Total Right‐of‐Way (ft) 32 ‐ 40 50 No 36 ‐ 40 No

As shown in Table 4, the existing Aguilar Road does not provide minimum required shoulder width, has a cross‐slope (north of Arrowhead Drive) that exceeds 5‐percent, and does not have the right‐of‐way required to be consistent with the then‐current County (1972) design standards. Similarly, the existing facility does not satisfy the City’s current design standards for these critical cross‐sectional elements.

Furthermore, applying the City’s 40‐foot right‐of‐way requirement per the current design standard (Semi‐ Rural Roadway, DWG# 3‐6A), we also assessed the amount of additional right‐of‐way that would be required to achieve this standard. Three different conditions have been considered and are provided to 234

Aguilar Road Evaluation P a g e 4 o f 4
Safety Assessment September 25, 2019
assist the City with identifying the various right‐of‐way needs for future potential roadway improvements.

The following is a summary of these findings:

 Existing Conditions (Exhibit 3): As depicted, the northern portion of Aguilar Road is currently outside the apparent eastern right‐of‐way line. It is estimated that 11,755‐square feet (sf) (0.27‐ acres) of additional right‐of‐way would be needed to correct this situation.  Holding Eastern Edge of Pavement (Exhibit 4): If the eastern edge of pavement is held and the 40‐foot right‐of‐way is offset to the west, it is estimated that 34,590‐sf (0.79‐acres) of additional right‐of‐way would be needed. It is important to note that this condition would also require the right‐of‐way noted in Exhibit 3 and discussed above, bringing to total for this condition to 46,345‐ sf (1.06‐acres)
 Holding Eastern Right‐of‐Way (Exhibit 5): Holding the apparent existing eastern property line and offsetting the 40‐foot right‐of‐way to the west is estimated to require 44,610‐sf (1.02‐acres) of additional right‐of‐way.

Posted Speed Limit Evaluation
According to Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), a prima facie speed limit of 25‐mph applies to “any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district”. Application of the “residence district” definition per CVC Section 515 and the California Manual for Setting Speed Limits, our assessment of Aguilar Road indicated a total of 29 separate “dwelling houses/business structures” compared to the requirement for at least 27 when considering the application of the required ratio of units to distance. As such, we have concluded that Aguilar Road, between China Garden Road and Greenbrae Road, satisfies the requirements for application of the 25‐mph prima facie speed limit as a “residence district”, thereby confirming the existing 25‐MPH posted and enforceable speed limit.

Conclusions
While the existing Aguilar Road’s cross‐section (travel lane widths, shoulder presence/width, cross‐slope, and right‐of‐way) does not satisfy either the then‐current Placer County or now‐current City of Rocklin standards, the facility does not exhibit an unsafe pattern of collisions. In fact, the roadway’s collision rate is approximately half that of other similar facilities statewide. Recent traffic data reveals that daily traffic volumes have decreased slightly, however the prevailing speeds are 10‐mph greater than the posted prima facie speed limit of 25‐mph. This combination of inadequate cross‐section, low collision rate, low and decreasing daily traffic volumes, and excessive speeds combine to create a situation that should be addressed. In an effort to reinforce the safety of Aguilar Road, the City should consider the following strategies:

Attachments:

Exhibit 1 – Existing Typical Cross‐Sections
Exhibit 2 – Prior and Current Standards
Exhibit 3 – Existing Right‐of‐Way
Exhibit 4 – 40’ Roadway Holding Existing Eastern Edge of Pavement Exhibit 5 – 40’ Roadway Holding Existing Eastern Property Line

Appendix A – Existing Traffic Count and Speed Data
235
R/W
.,..,_,
R/W
32' 40'
i
1 o·-12· 1 o·-12·

TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE
I

3.2-4.9% 1.0-3.3% -

EXISTING AGUILAR ROAD

CHINA GARDEN ROAD TO SYCAMORE PLACE

50.5'
13' 13'

TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE

1.6% 3.4%

EXISTING AGUILAR ROAD

SYCAMORE PLACE TO GREENBRAE ROAD
�
R/W
R/W
3' 4'

CURB SIDEWALK
&
GUTTER
SOURCE: RIGHT OF WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEVELOPED BY TSD ENGINEERING, INC., AUGUST 2015 Kimley>>> Horn
EXHIBIT 1
TYPICAL SECTIONS ON EXISTING AGUILAR ROAD 236
R/W
4'-6'

SHOULDER
2% -
Kimley>>> Horn
R/W
3• I g•
50'
g•

UNPAVED TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE

SHOULDER
2% 2% -
1972 PLACER COUNTY STANDARDS
RURAL MINOR ROADWAY (PLATE 2)
36' 40'
�
12' 12'

TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE
I
2% 2% -

CURRENT CITY OF ROCKLIN STANDARDS
SEMI-RURAL ROADWAY (DWG# 3-6A)
R/W
4'
PAVED

SHOULDER
4'-6'

SHOULDER
2% -
R/W
4'
---- 4: 7
EXHIBIT 2
PRIOR AND CURRENT STANDARDS 237
EXHIBIT 3

EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
NORTH
NORTH
LEGEND

EXISTING ROADWAY
ROW NEEDED FOR EXISTING ROADWAY11,755 sf
SOURCE: RIGHT OF WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEVELOPED BY TSD ENGINEERING, INC., AUGUST 2015 238
EXHIBIT 440' ROADWAY HOLDING EXISTING EASTERN EDGE OF PAVEMENT

NORTHNORTH
LEGEND

EXISTING ROADWAY
ROW NEEDED (HOLD EXISTING EP w/ 40' RDWY)
SOURCE: RIGHT OF WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEVELOPED BY TSD ENGINEERING, INC., AUGUST 2015 11,755 sf34,590 sfROW NEEDED FOR EXISTING ROADWAY
239
EXHIBIT 540' ROADWAY HOLDING EXISTING EASTERN PROPERTY LINE

NORTHNORTH
LEGEND

EXISTING ROADWAY
ROW NEEDED (HOLD EAST ROW w/ 40' RDWY)
SOURCE: RIGHT OF WAY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DEVELOPED BY TSD ENGINEERING, INC., AUGUST 2015 44,610 sf
240

Aguilar Road Evaluation
Safety Assessment

Appendix A
Existing Traffic Count and Speed Data
241
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0382000000000 13
1:00 0093000000000 12
2:00 0244000000000 10
3:00 0032100000000 6
4:00 0287000000000 17
5:00 06 1 9 1 8110000000 45
6:00 18 4 8 3 5420000000 98
7:00 2 3 5 9 8 6 1820000000 206
8:00 8 2 3 1 1 6 6 9 1 300000000 229
9:00 5 2 5 7 4 4 3800000000 155
10:00 2 2 4 7 1 6 4520000000 168
11:00 1 1 7 1 0 7 6 1 1 400000000 200
12:00 PM 2 2 6 9 2 7 5 1 210000000 208
13:00 3 2 0 1 0 7 7 2730000000 212
14:00 4 3 2 1 0 6 5 4600000000 202
15:00 4 3 5 1 4 4 7 2 1 210000000 268
16:00 4 1 6 1 0 9 9 2200000000 223
17:00 2 3 1 1 1 0 9 3 1 400000000 250
18:00 3 2 3 1 3 3 8 0 1 010000000 250
19:00 3 2 0 9 2 6 2320000000 182
20:00 2 1 0 6 2 3 8300000000 115
21:00 0 1 5 5 9 4 3300000000 120
22:00 2 1 1 6 0 1 7400000000 94
23:00 08 3 3 2 3400000000 68
48 392 1672 1090 134 15 3351
1% 12% 50% 33% 4% 0% 100%
1 9 1 4 5 5 6 5 3 6 9 5 470000000 1159
1% 4% 17% 11% 2% 0% 35%
8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 6 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 8 3 5 1 1 6 6 9 1 4 2 2 2 9
29 247 1107 721 80 80000000 2192
1% 7% 33% 22% 2% 0% 65%
14:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 13:00 15:00
4 3 5 1 4 4 9 3 1 4 3 2 6 8
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
435 13% 420 13% 473 14% 2023 60%
Summary
AM Volumes
% AM
All Speeds
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
8/23/2019
Summary
AM Peak Hour
Totals
% of Totals
Friday
ADT
3351
Percentiles
24 Average
24 15th Street Name
Aguilar Rd
85th
28 95th
30 50thDirection
20 242
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,667 1,684 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 1 1 0 0 2 2 9 3 4 0 0 6 3
0:15 1 2 0 0 3 3 3 2 9 0 0 6 2
0:30 1 4 0 0 5 1 8 2 6 0 0 4 4
0:45 0 3 3 10 0 0 3 13 15 95 24 113 0 0 39 208
1:00 2 2 0 0 4 2 2 2 3 0 0 4 5
1:15 1 3 0 0 4 3 2 2 1 0 0 5 3
1:30 0 1 0 0 1 2 8 2 9 0 0 5 7
1:45 1428 0 0 3 1 2 2 2 1 0 4 3 5 1 0 8 0 0 5 7 2 1 2
2:00 1 3 0 0 4 2 8 2 2 0 0 5 0
2:15 1 1 0 0 2 3 4 2 5 0 0 5 9
2:30 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 0 0 4 5
2:45 1515 0 0 2 1 0 2 4 1 0 8 2 4 9 4 0 0 4 8 2 0 2
3:00 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 5 2 0 0 8 2
3:15 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 7 0 0 6 7
3:30 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 2 5 0 0 5 6
3:45 4501 0 0 46 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 4 6 0 0 6 3 2 6 8
4:00 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 5
4:15 3 0 0 0 3 1 7 3 5 0 0 5 2
4:30 2 2 0 0 4 2 9 2 9 0 0 5 8
4:45 7 13 1 4 0 0 8 17 29 96 39 127 0 0 68 223
5:00 10 1 0 0 11 26 36 0 0 62
5:15 4 3 0 0 7 3 5 3 5 0 0 7 0
5:30 12 2 0 0 14 29 35 0 0 64
5:45 12 38 1 7 0 0 13 45 27 117 27 133 0 0 54 250
6:00 11 6 0 0 17 33 49 0 0 82
6:15 10 7 0 0 17 33 35 0 0 68
6:30 15 9 0 0 24 27 24 0 0 51
6:45 30 66 10 32 0 0 40 98 26 119 23 131 0 0 49 250
7:00 32 8 0 0 40 20 27 0 0 47
7:15 29 14 0 0 43 24 27 0 0 51
7:30 40 20 0 0 60 20 20 0 0 40
7:45 35 136 28 70 0 0 63 206 22 86 22 96 0 0 44 182
8:00 30 30 0 0 60 19 15 0 0 34
8:15 3 8 2 0 0 0 5 8 7 1 6 0 0 2 3
8:30 31 23 0 0 54 10 20 0 0 30
8:45 38 137 19 92 0 0 57 229 6 42 22 73 0 0 28 115
9:00 21 19 0 0 40 13 21 0 0 34
9:15 21 10 0 0 31 16 19 0 0 35
9:30 2 5 1 6 0 0 4 1 8 1 6 0 0 2 4
9:45 15 82 28 73 0 0 43 155 6 43 21 77 0 0 27 120
10:00 1 8 2 3 0 0 4 1 7 1 3 0 0 2 0
10:15 1 8 1 8 0 0 3 6 5 2 5 0 0 3 0
10:30 3 4 1 0 0 0 4 4 9 1 6 0 0 2 5
10:45 22 92 25 76 0 0 47 168 6 27 13 67 0 0 19 94
11:00 1 9 1 7 0 0 3 6 4 1 1 0 0 1 5
11:15 3 5 2 4 0 0 5 9 7 1 8 0 0 2 5
11:30 2 6 3 0 0 0 5 6 8 5 0 0 1 3
11:45 24 104 25 96 0 0 49 200 4 23 11 45 0 0 15 68
TOTALS 685 474 1159 982 1210 2192
SPLIT % 59.1% 40.9% 34.6% 44.8% 55.2% 65.4%

NB SB EB WB
1,667 1,684 00
AM Peak Hour 7:30 11:30 7:30 17:15 15:00 17:15
AM Pk Volume 143 118 241 124 146 270
Pk Hr Factor 0.894 0.868 0.956 0.886 0.702 0.823
7 ‐ 9 Volume 273 162 00 435 213 260 00 473
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:30 7:45 7:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 143 101 0 0 241 119 145 0 0 264 Pk Hr Factor 0.894 0.842 0.000 0.000 0.956 0.850 0.929 0.000 0.000 0.943 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Friday
8/23/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,351
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
13:15
13:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
21:45
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
DAILY TOTALS
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
23:00
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
Total
3,351
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
243
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 03 1 7 1 2200000000 34
1:00 04 1 76000000000 27
2:00 038 1 0100000000 22
3:00 0033000000000 6
4:00 0241000000000 7
5:00 1363000000000 13
6:00 03 1 3 1 4110000000 32
7:00 08 5 3 4 4800000000 113
8:00 2 2 3 7 9 4 0610000000 151
9:00 1 2 7 9 9 6 7 1 000000000 204
10:00 1 3 0 8 0 6 9520000000 187
11:00 4 3 8 1 0 0 7 6 1 000000000 228
12:00 PM 8 2 1 1 0 6 8 4 1 110000000 231
13:00 2 1 9 1 1 0 6 6 1 000000000 207
14:00 4 3 1 1 2 7 6 3400000000 229
15:00 0 2 4 1 0 2 9 3810000000 228
16:00 3 1 5 8 8 9 3620000000 207
17:00 0 1 1 8 1 8 1700000000 180
18:00 1 1 3 7 7 5 0410000000 146
19:00 1 1 5 7 7 4 0520000000 140
20:00 2 1 7 7 1 2 6200000000 118
21:00 0 1 0 5 5 1 7200000000 84
22:00 14 4 4 2 3000000000 72
23:00 12 2 8 2 0200000000 53
32 326 1445 1001 104 11 2919
1% 11% 50% 34% 4% 0% 100%
9 1 4 4 4 7 9 3 4 5 4 340000000 1024
0% 5% 16% 12% 1% 0% 35%
1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 4 3 8 1 0 0 7 6 1 0 2 2 2 8
2 3 1 8 2 9 6 6 6 5 6 6 170000000 1895
1% 6% 33% 22% 2% 0% 65%
12:00 14:00 14:00 15:00 12:00 16:00 12:00
8 3 1 1 2 7 9 3 1 1 2 2 3 1
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
264 9% 438 15% 387 13% 1830 63%
Summary 2919
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Saturday
8/24/2019
244
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,471 1,448 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 4 7 0 0 1 1 3 0 3 3 0 0 6 3
0:15 5 5 0 0 1 0 3 3 2 2 0 0 5 5
0:30 0 1 0 0 1 2 8 3 4 0 0 6 2
0:45 4 13 8 21 0 0 12 34 25 116 26 115 0 0 51 231
1:00 4 9 0 0 1 3 3 0 3 6 0 0 6 6
1:15 1 5 0 0 6 2 7 2 1 0 0 4 8
1:30 1 3 0 0 4 2 1 2 0 0 0 4 1
1:45 1 7 3 20 0 0 4 27 22 100 30 107 0 0 52 207
2:00 2 4 0 0 6 2 0 2 8 0 0 4 8
2:15 0 3 0 0 3 2 9 3 2 0 0 6 1
2:30 1 2 0 0 3 3 2 3 6 0 0 6 8
2:45 6 9 4 13 0 0 10 22 20 101 32 128 0 0 52 229
3:00 2 1 0 0 3 2 6 3 7 0 0 6 3
3:15 1 2 0 0 3 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 5
3:30 0 0 0 0 1 7 3 3 0 0 5 0
3:45 0303 0 0 6 3 5 9 9 3 5 1 2 9 0 0 7 0 2 2 8
4:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 7 2 7 0 0 5 4
4:15 1 1 0 0 2 2 6 2 5 0 0 5 1
4:30 2 0 0 0 2 2 9 1 8 0 0 4 7
4:45 2601 0 0 27 2 7 1 0 9 2 8 9 8 0 0 5 5 2 0 7
5:00 1 4 0 0 5 2 8 2 3 0 0 5 1
5:15 1 0 0 0 1 2 8 2 7 0 0 5 5
5:30 2 0 0 0 2 1 8 1 8 0 0 3 6
5:45 3726 0 0 5 1 3 2 1 9 5 1 7 8 5 0 0 3 8 1 8 0
6:00 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 4 0 0 3 4
6:15 5 1 0 0 6 1 9 2 3 0 0 4 2
6:30 7 3 0 0 1 0 1 6 2 3 0 0 3 9
6:45 13 27 1 5 0 0 14 32 14 69 17 77 0 0 31 146
7:00 7 7 0 0 1 4 1 8 2 1 0 0 3 9
7:15 25 11 0 0 36 18 18 0 0 36
7:30 20 10 0 0 30 18 24 0 0 42
7:45 17 69 16 44 0 0 33 113 10 64 13 76 0 0 23 140
8:00 16 18 0 0 34 13 21 0 0 34
8:15 24 15 0 0 39 12 18 0 0 30
8:30 2 5 1 5 0 0 4 0 8 2 0 0 0 2 8
8:45 26 91 12 60 0 0 38 151 9 42 17 76 0 0 26 118
9:00 2 3 1 2 0 0 3 5 9 1 3 0 0 2 2
9:15 2 6 1 6 0 0 4 2 1 2 7 0 0 1 9
9:30 3 9 2 3 0 0 6 2 7 1 1 0 0 1 8
9:45 41 129 24 75 0 0 65 204 11 39 14 45 0 0 25 84
10:00 2 5 2 1 0 0 4 6 9 1 0 0 0 1 9
10:15 2 7 1 8 0 0 4 5 5 1 0 0 0 1 5
10:30 3 1 2 2 0 0 5 3 9 1 1 0 0 2 0
10:45 23 106 20 81 0 0 43 187 10 33 8 39 0 0 18 72
11:00 2 1 2 6 0 0 4 7 5 1 5 0 0 2 0
11:15 2 6 2 7 0 0 5 3 7 9 0 0 1 6
11:30 3 1 2 4 0 0 5 5 1 1 0 0 0 1 1
11:45 44 122 29 106 0 0 73 228 2 15 4 38 0 0 6 53
TOTALS 589 435 1024 882 1013 1895
SPLIT % 57.5% 42.5% 35.1% 46.5% 53.5% 64.9%

NB SB EB WB
1,471 1,448 00
AM Peak Hour 11:30 11:45 11:45 15:45 14:15 14:15
AM Pk Volume 138 118 253 117 137 244
Pk Hr Factor 0.784 0.868 0.866 0.836 0.926 0.897
7 ‐ 9 Volume 160 104 00 264 204 183 00 387
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 8:00 7:45 8:00 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 91 64 0 0 151 112 98 0 0 208
Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.889 0.000 0.000 0.944 0.966 0.875 0.000 0.000 0.945 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
2,919
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
2,919
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Saturday
8/24/2019
245
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 1 1 0 1 56100000000 33
1:00 33 2 19000000000 36
2:00 02 1 28000000000 22
3:00 0144100000000 10
4:00 0033000000000 6
5:00 0242000000000 8
6:00 0287200000000 19
7:00 01 2 3 2 4000000000 48
8:00 07 6 2 4 0600000000 115
9:00 0 1 3 6 2 6 7810000000 151
10:00 1 2 0 9 8 6 6710000000 193
11:00 2 2 2 9 4 5 0910000000 178
12:00 PM 1 2 1 1 0 6 6 7700000000 202
13:00 0 1 5 1 2 0 6 6710000000 209
14:00 2 1 0 9 4 6 9700000000 182
15:00 2 1 5 8 8 7 0600000000 181
16:00 2 2 1 9 9 5 9400000000 185
17:00 1 1 5 9 8 7 0 1 020000000 196
18:00 0 1 7 7 4 5 5510000000 152
19:00 0 1 7 6 4 5 1600000000 138
20:00 19 6 0 3 5000000000 105
21:00 18 3 6 2 3100000000 69
22:00 16 2 2 1 3100000000 43
23:00 03 1 4 1 2200000000 31
18 240 1281 876 90 7 2512
1% 10% 51% 35% 4% 0% 100%
7 8 3 4 0 6 2 8 6 3 430000000 8 1 9
0% 3% 16% 11% 1% 0% 33%
1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 3 2 2 9 8 6 7 9 1 1 9 3
1 1 1 5 7 8 7 5 5 9 0 5 640000000 1693
0% 6% 35% 23% 2% 0% 67%
14:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 13:00
2 2 1 1 2 0 7 0 1 0 2 2 0 9
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
163 6% 411 16% 381 15% 1557 62%
Summary 2512
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Sunday
8/25/2019
246
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,258 1,254 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 4 0 0 4 2 9 2 4 0 0 5 3
0:15 3 5 0 0 8 1 7 2 7 0 0 4 4
0:30 3 12 0 0 15 22 33 0 0 55
0:45 1 7 5 26 0 0 6 33 19 87 31 115 0 0 50 202
1:00 1 10 0 0 11 22 34 0 0 56
1:15 1 7 0 0 8 2 9 2 7 0 0 5 6
1:30 6 6 0 0 1 2 2 4 2 3 0 0 4 7
1:45 4 12 1 24 0 0 5 36 24 99 26 110 0 0 50 209
2:00 4 3 0 0 7 1 4 3 0 0 0 4 4
2:15 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 1 8 0 0 3 8
2:30 2 3 0 0 5 1 5 2 2 0 0 3 7
2:45 5 11 3 11 0 0 8 22 26 75 37 107 0 0 63 182
3:00 1 4 0 0 5 2 6 1 9 0 0 4 5
3:15 1 2 0 0 3 2 6 2 0 0 0 4 6
3:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 2 3 0 0 3 8
3:45 1406 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 8 8 3 1 9 3 0 0 5 2 1 8 1
4:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 2 4 0 0 4 8
4:15 1 1 0 0 2 2 4 2 1 0 0 4 5
4:30 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 1 0 0 4 3
4:45 1412 0 0 26 2 2 9 2 2 7 9 3 0 0 4 9 1 8 5
5:00 1 1 0 0 2 3 5 2 1 0 0 5 6
5:15 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 0 5 4
5:30 1 2 0 0 3 1 9 2 7 0 0 4 6
5:45 3503 0 0 38 1 9 9 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 9 6
6:00 1 2 0 0 3 1 4 2 7 0 0 4 1
6:15 3 0 0 0 3 1 4 2 3 0 0 3 7
6:30 3 2 0 0 5 2 8 1 5 0 0 4 3
6:45 7 14 1 5 0 0 8 19 18 74 13 78 0 0 31 152
7:00 2 2 0 0 4 1 6 1 3 0 0 2 9
7:15 6 3 0 0 9 1 3 1 2 0 0 2 5
7:30 9 4 0 0 1 3 1 8 2 4 0 0 4 2
7:45 1 43 1 8 1 7 0 0 2 24 8 1 86 52 47 3 0 0 4 2 1 3 8 8:00 13 10 0 0 23 14 13 0 0 27
8:15 21 13 0 0 34 11 20 0 0 31
8:30 19 5 0 0 24 5 16 0 0 21
8:45 25 78 9 37 0 0 34 115 8 38 18 67 0 0 26 105
9:00 35 8 0 0 43 12 15 0 0 27
9:15 13 14 0 0 27 10 11 0 0 21
9:30 2 4 1 5 0 0 3 9 8 9 0 0 1 7
9:45 21 93 21 58 0 0 42 151 2 32 2 37 0 0 4 69
10:00 2 7 1 6 0 0 4 3 3 7 0 0 1 0
10:15 36 19 0 0 55 2 5 0 0 7
10:30 3 0 1 7 0 0 4 7 4 6 0 0 1 0
10:45 28 121 20 72 0 0 48 193 9 18 7 25 0 0 16 43
11:00 28 28 0 0 56 5 4 0 0 9
11:15 2 0 1 4 0 0 3 4 3 8 0 0 1 1
11:30 24 18 0 0 42 1 5 0 0 6
11:45 30 102 16 76 0 0 46 178 3 12 2 19 0 0 5 31
TOTALS 482 337 819 776 917 1693
SPLIT % 58.9% 41.1% 32.6% 45.8% 54.2% 67.4%

NB SB EB WB
1,258 1,254 00
AM Peak Hour 10:15 11:45 10:15 16:15 12:15 12:30
AM Pk Volume 122 100 206 103 125 217
Pk Hr Factor 0.847 0.758 0.920 0.736 0.919 0.969
7 ‐ 9 Volume 109 54 00 163 188 193 00 381
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 8:00 8:00 8:00 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 78 37 0 0 115 103 106 0 0 205
Pk Hr Factor 0.780 0.712 0.000 0.000 0.846 0.736 0.855 0.000 0.000 0.915 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
2,512
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
2,512
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Sunday
8/25/2019
247
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0052000000000 7
1:00 0118000000000 10
2:00 0022100000000 5
3:00 2244100000000 13
4:00 03 1 17000000000 21
5:00 33 1 3 1 5110000000 36
6:00 4 1 3 7 3 3 1500000000 126
7:00 6 4 6 9 9 4 6610000000 204
8:00 4 3 5 9 0 7 0820000000 209
9:00 5 1 4 6 7 6 3500000000 154
10:00 2 2 3 9 3 4 7500000000 170
11:00 2 1 5 8 5 5 5630000000 166
12:00 PM 3 3 7 8 1 7 8 1 000000000 209
13:00 8 2 9 1 0 8 7 7500000000 227
14:00 1 2 3 7 1 0 3 6 2600000000 220
15:00 2 2 8 8 8 6 1700000000 186
16:00 5 2 2 9 9 6 6800000000 200
17:00 3 3 0 1 2 5 9 7720000000 264
18:00 1 1 9 9 4 6 7 1 100000000 192
19:00 0 1 1 7 8 5 1600000000 146
20:00 0 1 0 6 3 4 2200000000 117
21:00 0 1 5 4 8 2 1800000000 92
22:00 13 2 4 1 0200000000 40
23:00 0245100000000 12
63 398 1458 987 111 9 3026
2% 13% 48% 33% 4% 0% 100%
2 8 1 5 5 5 4 3 3 5 0 3 870000000 1121
1% 5% 18% 12% 1% 0% 37%
7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 6 4 6 9 9 7 0 8 3 2 0 9
3 5 2 4 3 9 1 5 6 3 7 7 320000000 1905
1% 8% 30% 21% 2% 0% 63%
14:00 12:00 17:00 17:00 18:00 17:00 17:00
1 2 3 7 1 2 5 9 7 1 1 2 2 6 4
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
413 14% 436 14% 464 15% 1713 57%
Summary 3026
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Monday
8/26/2019
248
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,527 1,499 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 2 0 0 2 1 7 1 5 0 0 3 2
0:15 1 3 0 0 4 2 3 3 0 0 0 5 3
0:30 1 0 0 0 1 3 5 3 0 0 0 6 5
0:45 0205 0 0 7 3 3 1 0 8 2 6 1 0 1 0 0 5 9 2 0 9
1:00 3 1 0 0 4 2 7 2 6 0 0 5 3
1:15 1 2 0 0 3 3 8 3 2 0 0 7 0
1:30 0 1 0 0 1 2 5 2 3 0 0 4 8
1:45 0426 0 0 2 1 0 2 6 1 1 6 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 5 6 2 2 7
2:00 1 1 0 0 2 2 8 3 4 0 0 6 2
2:15 1 0 0 0 1 2 7 2 8 0 0 5 5
2:30 1 0 0 0 1 2 6 2 0 0 0 4 6
2:45 0312 0 0 15 2 3 1 0 4 3 4 1 1 6 0 0 5 7 2 2 0
3:00 1 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 9 0 0 6 0
3:15 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 2 9 0 0 4 1
3:30 3 2 0 0 5 1 4 3 0 0 0 4 4
3:45 4914 0 0 5 1 3 2 2 8 9 1 9 9 7 0 0 4 1 1 8 6
4:00 4 1 0 0 5 2 8 2 2 0 0 5 0
4:15 5 0 0 0 5 1 8 2 8 0 0 4 6
4:30 4 1 0 0 5 2 5 2 1 0 0 4 6
4:45 6 19 0 2 0 0 6 21 25 96 33 104 0 0 58 200
5:00 6 3 0 0 9 2 3 3 9 0 0 6 2
5:15 7 2 0 0 9 2 3 5 3 0 0 7 6
5:30 11 3 0 0 14 31 37 0 0 68
5:45 4 28 0 8 0 0 4 36 20 97 38 167 0 0 58 264
6:00 12 1 0 0 13 24 21 0 0 45
6:15 23 13 0 0 36 20 31 0 0 51
6:30 19 16 0 0 35 18 32 0 0 50
6:45 25 79 17 47 0 0 42 126 18 80 28 112 0 0 46 192
7:00 24 13 0 0 37 21 20 0 0 41
7:15 37 9 0 0 46 11 24 0 0 35
7:30 48 15 0 0 63 14 26 0 0 40
7:45 37 146 21 58 0 0 58 204 15 61 15 85 0 0 30 146
8:00 37 32 0 0 69 14 11 0 0 25
8:15 32 23 0 0 55 12 20 0 0 32
8:30 26 18 0 0 44 12 25 0 0 37
8:45 22 117 19 92 0 0 41 209 6 44 17 73 0 0 23 117
9:00 1 8 1 6 0 0 3 4 7 1 7 0 0 2 4
9:15 2 2 1 6 0 0 3 8 8 1 3 0 0 2 1
9:30 21 16 0 0 37 14 15 0 0 29
9:45 29 90 16 64 0 0 45 154 6 35 12 57 0 0 18 92
10:00 2 6 1 2 0 0 3 8 2 1 1 0 0 1 3
10:15 2 1 2 2 0 0 4 3 3 9 0 0 1 2
10:30 29 16 0 0 45 3 3 0 0 6
10:45 17 93 27 77 0 0 44 170 4 12 5 28 0 0 9 40
11:00 16 20 0 0 36 1 2 0 0 3
11:15 16 15 0 0 31 1 2 0 0 3
11:30 27 23 0 0 50 2 2 0 0 4
11:45 3 1 9 0 1 8 7 6 0 0 4 9 1 6 6 1517 0 0 2 1 2
TOTALS 680 441 1121 847 1058 1905
SPLIT % 60.7% 39.3% 37.0% 44.5% 55.5% 63.0%

NB SB EB WB
1,527 1,499 00
AM Peak Hour 7:15 7:45 7:30 12:30 17:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 159 94 245 133 167 264
Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.734 0.888 0.875 0.788 0.868
7 ‐ 9 Volume 263 150 00 413 193 271 00 464
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:15 7:45 7:30 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 159 94 0 0 245 102 167 0 0 264 Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.734 0.000 0.000 0.888 0.823 0.788 0.000 0.000 0.868 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,026
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,026
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Monday
8/26/2019
249
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0045000000000 9
1:00 0165100000000 13
2:00 0180100000000 10
3:00 0142200000000 9
4:00 03 1 05000000000 18
5:00 05 2 6 1 5110000000 48
6:00 0 1 4 4 3 3 8220000000 99
7:00 8 4 8 8 4 5 9 1 820000000 219
8:00 4 3 0 9 4 6 9300000000 200
9:00 2 2 2 9 4 4 2920000000 171
10:00 3 1 7 8 3 5 1910000000 164
11:00 3 2 6 8 4 4 6400000000 163
12:00 PM 5 3 1 9 0 5 2800000000 186
13:00 3 2 2 8 0 6 3701000000 176
14:00 2 1 7 8 3 5 7700000000 166
15:00 6 3 6 1 2 3 8 0600000000 251
16:00 5 2 1 1 1 8 8 0301000000 228
17:00 8 2 7 1 1 5 8 4 1 421000000 251
18:00 0 2 0 8 6 7 3900000000 188
19:00 1 1 7 7 9 5 0610000000 154
20:00 2 1 0 7 5 3 5300000000 125
21:00 07 5 4 3 1200000000 94
22:00 04 2 3 1 2200000000 41
23:00 0298200000000 21
52 382 1475 962 119 11 3 3004
2% 13% 49% 32% 4% 0% 0% 100%
2 0 1 6 8 5 4 0 3 3 7 5 080000000 1123
1% 6% 18% 11% 2% 0% 37%
7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 6 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 4 8 9 4 6 9 1 8 2 2 1 9
3 2 2 1 4 9 3 5 6 2 5 6 933000000 1881
1% 7% 31% 21% 2% 0% 0% 63%
17:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 13:00 15:00
8 3 6 1 2 3 8 4 1 4 2 1 2 5 1
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
419 14% 362 12% 479 16% 1744 58%
Summary 3004
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Tuesday
8/27/2019
250
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,503 1,501 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 7 1 6 0 0 4 3
0:15 1 3 0 0 4 1 5 3 0 0 0 4 5
0:30 0 2 0 0 2 1 9 2 7 0 0 4 6
0:45 1217 0 0 29 2 9 9 0 2 3 9 6 0 0 5 2 1 8 6
1:00 2 1 0 0 3 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 6
1:15 1 2 0 0 3 2 6 2 2 0 0 4 8
1:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 9 2 6 0 0 4 5
1:45 3637 0 0 6 1 3 2 7 9 2 2 0 8 4 0 0 4 7 1 7 6
2:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 9 1 5 0 0 3 4
2:15 2 0 0 0 2 3 6 1 2 0 0 4 8
2:30 2 2 0 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0
2:45 2614 0 0 3 1 0 1 7 9 2 2 7 7 4 0 0 4 4 1 6 6
3:00 1 2 0 0 3 2 7 4 3 0 0 7 0
3:15 0 1 0 0 1 2 7 3 6 0 0 6 3
3:30 3 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 6 6
3:45 1514 0 0 29 2 3 1 1 0 2 9 1 4 1 0 0 5 2 2 5 1
4:00 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 3 2 0 0 4 6
4:15 3 1 0 0 4 2 9 2 9 0 0 5 8
4:30 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 3 7 0 0 5 7
4:45 7 14 3 4 0 0 10 18 32 95 35 133 0 0 67 228
5:00 8 4 0 0 1 2 2 9 2 6 0 0 5 5
5:15 8 0 0 0 8 3 0 3 9 0 0 6 9
5:30 13 1 0 0 14 26 29 0 0 55
5:45 12 41 2 7 0 0 14 48 28 113 44 138 0 0 72 251
6:00 13 4 0 0 17 17 29 0 0 46
6:15 13 5 0 0 18 16 32 0 0 48
6:30 19 6 0 0 25 16 28 0 0 44
6:45 28 73 11 26 0 0 39 99 25 74 25 114 0 0 50 188
7:00 38 12 0 0 50 12 31 0 0 43
7:15 38 17 0 0 55 18 21 0 0 39
7:30 45 11 0 0 56 15 22 0 0 37
7:45 38 159 20 60 0 0 58 219 15 60 20 94 0 0 35 154
8:00 32 23 0 0 55 15 20 0 0 35
8:15 3 2 2 4 0 0 5 6 9 1 8 0 0 2 7
8:30 19 19 0 0 38 10 24 0 0 34
8:45 31 114 20 86 0 0 51 200 9 43 20 82 0 0 29 125
9:00 2 1 2 4 0 0 4 5 4 2 0 0 0 2 4
9:15 2 6 2 7 0 0 5 3 7 1 6 0 0 2 3
9:30 2 6 1 4 0 0 4 0 6 1 9 0 0 2 5
9:45 23 96 10 75 0 0 33 171 5 22 17 72 0 0 22 94
10:00 2 5 1 9 0 0 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 1 4
10:15 21 17 0 0 38 5 4 0 0 9
10:30 19 19 0 0 38 5 4 0 0 9
10:45 24 89 20 75 0 0 44 164 1 15 8 26 0 0 9 41
11:00 20 14 0 0 34 2 4 0 0 6
11:15 20 18 0 0 38 1 3 0 0 4
11:30 13 26 0 0 39 5 3 0 0 8
11:45 29 82 23 81 0 0 52 163 2 10 1 11 0 0 3 21
TOTALS 687 436 1123 816 1065 1881
SPLIT % 61.2% 38.8% 37.4% 43.4% 56.6% 62.6%

NB SB EB WB
1,503 1,501 00
AM Peak Hour 7:00 11:45 7:30 16:45 15:00 15:00
AM Pk Volume 159 96 225 117 141 251
Pk Hr Factor 0.883 0.800 0.970 0.914 0.820 0.896
7 ‐ 9 Volume 273 146 00 419 208 271 00 479
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:45 7:30 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 159 86 0 0 225 117 138 0 0 251 Pk Hr Factor 0.883 0.896 0.000 0.000 0.970 0.914 0.784 0.000 0.000 0.872 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,004
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,004
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Tuesday
8/27/2019
251
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0156100000000 13
1:00 0342000000000 9
2:00 0003000000000 3
3:00 0113100000000 6
4:00 0079200000000 18
5:00 06 2 0 1 5000000000 41
6:00 1 2 5 5 2 2 2810000000 109
7:00 7 2 3 9 5 6 2 1 220000000 201
8:00 7 3 1 9 0 6 3520000000 198
9:00 3 1 5 6 8 4 7 1 100000000 144
10:00 1 1 8 7 6 4 9700000000 151
11:00 1 1 4 8 0 6 6400000000 165
12:00 PM 5 3 5 7 4 5 3510000000 173
13:00 1 2 9 7 8 7 0 1 200000000 190
14:00 7 3 3 1 0 2 5 8 1 100000000 211
15:00 2 2 3 1 0 3 7 4410000000 207
16:00 1 2 5 9 7 8 7 1 010000000 221
17:00 3 3 6 1 0 0 9 6600000000 241
18:00 0 2 1 1 1 0 5 4700000000 192
19:00 5 1 5 1 0 5 5 2410000000 182
20:00 0 2 4 9 6 4 4540000000 173
21:00 0 1 2 4 0 3 4000000000 86
22:00 08 2 6 2 1000000000 55
23:00 01 1 54200000000 22
44 399 1444 994 117 13 3011
1% 13% 48% 33% 4% 0% 100%
2 0 1 3 7 4 9 8 3 4 7 5 150000000 1058
1% 5% 17% 12% 2% 0% 35%
7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 3 1 9 5 6 6 1 2 2 2 0 1
2 4 2 6 2 9 4 6 6 4 7 6 680000000 1953
1% 9% 31% 21% 2% 0% 65%
14:00 17:00 18:00 17:00 13:00 20:00 17:00
7 3 6 1 1 0 9 6 1 2 4 2 4 1
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
399 13% 363 12% 462 15% 1787 59%
Summary 3011
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Wednesday
8/28/2019
252
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,519 1,492 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 2 2 0 0 4 2 9 1 9 0 0 4 8
0:15 1 4 0 0 5 1 7 1 4 0 0 3 1
0:30 1 1 0 0 2 2 5 3 1 0 0 5 6
0:45 2607 0 0 2 1 3 1 3 8 4 2 5 8 9 0 0 3 8 1 7 3
1:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 6 2 0 0 0 4 6
1:15 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 3 0 0 4 5
1:30 2 3 0 0 5 2 0 2 5 0 0 4 5
1:45 1415 0 0 29 3 0 9 8 2 4 9 2 0 0 5 4 1 9 0
2:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 9 2 6 0 0 5 5
2:15 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 6 0 0 4 0
2:30 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 5 0 0 5 9
2:45 1112 0 0 23 2 7 1 1 4 3 0 9 7 0 0 5 7 2 1 1
3:00 1 1 0 0 2 1 9 3 2 0 0 5 1
3:15 0 0 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 6 1
3:30 1 1 0 0 2 2 3 2 6 0 0 4 9
3:45 2402 0 0 26 2 3 8 6 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 4 6 2 0 7
4:00 1 0 0 0 1 1 6 3 0 0 0 4 6
4:15 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 4 4 0 0 6 6
4:30 5 2 0 0 7 2 7 2 2 0 0 4 9
4:45 7 15 1 3 0 0 8 18 28 93 32 128 0 0 60 221
5:00 3 2 0 0 5 2 6 4 3 0 0 6 9
5:15 11 0 0 0 11 26 34 0 0 60
5:30 12 1 0 0 13 25 28 0 0 53
5:45 11 37 1 4 0 0 12 41 27 104 32 137 0 0 59 241
6:00 13 4 0 0 17 14 43 0 0 57
6:15 17 4 0 0 21 27 31 0 0 58
6:30 22 5 0 0 27 17 25 0 0 42
6:45 30 82 14 27 0 0 44 109 10 68 25 124 0 0 35 192
7:00 40 7 0 0 47 20 25 0 0 45
7:15 32 7 0 0 39 24 27 0 0 51
7:30 50 16 0 0 66 20 28 0 0 48
7:45 31 153 18 48 0 0 49 201 20 84 18 98 0 0 38 182
8:00 30 26 0 0 56 12 19 0 0 31
8:15 34 19 0 0 53 13 29 0 0 42
8:30 34 19 0 0 53 29 31 0 0 60
8:45 18 116 18 82 0 0 36 198 17 71 23 102 0 0 40 173
9:00 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 2 5 1 6 0 0 2 1
9:15 1 8 1 8 0 0 3 6 2 1 8 0 0 2 0
9:30 29 15 0 0 44 11 18 0 0 29
9:45 19 86 13 58 0 0 32 144 9 27 7 59 0 0 16 86
10:00 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 3 4 1 4 0 0 1 8
10:15 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 6 6 0 0 1 2
10:30 2 4 1 5 0 0 3 9 1 1 3 0 0 1 4
10:45 30 87 19 64 0 0 49 151 5 16 6 39 0 0 11 55
11:00 23 18 0 0 41 3 5 0 0 8
11:15 20 22 0 0 42 2 5 0 0 7
11:30 15 19 0 0 34 0 5 0 0 5
11:45 20 78 28 87 0 0 48 165 0 5 2 17 0 0 2 22
TOTALS 669 389 1058 850 1103 1953
SPLIT % 63.2% 36.8% 35.1% 43.5% 56.5% 64.9%

NB SB EB WB
1,519 1,492 00
AM Peak Hour 7:00 11:45 7:30 13:45 16:15 16:15
AM Pk Volume 153 92 224 117 141 244
Pk Hr Factor 0.765 0.742 0.848 0.860 0.801 0.884
7 ‐ 9 Volume 269 130 00 399 197 265 00 462
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:45 7:30 16:30 16:15 16:15
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 153 82 0 0 224 107 141 0 0 244 Pk Hr Factor 0.765 0.788 0.000 0.000 0.848 0.955 0.801 0.000 0.000 0.884 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,011
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,011
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Wednesday
8/28/2019
253
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0174000000000 12
1:00 0142000000000 7
2:00 0022000000000 4
3:00 0121200000000 6
4:00 02 1 36000000000 21
5:00 07 2 2 2 4100000000 54
6:00 1 1 9 5 1 2 8 1 220000000 113
7:00 0 3 2 8 9 5 9 1 420000000 196
8:00 7 2 8 7 9 6 0 1 210000000 187
9:00 1 1 4 7 4 5 0610000000 146
10:00 0 1 8 7 5 4 7 1 111000000 153
11:00 5 2 2 8 2 7 5500000000 189
12:00 PM 2 2 0 9 9 4 5700000000 173
13:00 4 1 7 8 5 5 8810000000 173
14:00 4 3 7 8 2 8 0600000000 209
15:00 1 0 3 8 1 3 1 6 0 1 010000000 250
16:00 6 2 6 1 2 0 6 9 1 000000000 231
17:00 7 3 8 1 2 2 8 6800000000 261
18:00 3 1 2 9 0 7 4511000000 186
19:00 1 1 2 7 9 4 8500000000 145
20:00 0 1 9 6 8 4 5501000000 138
21:00 07 3 7 2 4510000000 74
22:00 06 2 3 1 6200000000 47
23:00 07 2 18000000000 36
51 384 1457 971 134 11 3 3011
2% 13% 48% 32% 4% 0% 0% 100%
1 4 1 4 5 5 0 0 3 5 8 6 371000000 1088
0% 5% 17% 12% 2% 0% 0% 36%
8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 6 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 3 2 8 9 7 5 1 4 2 1 1 9 6
3 7 2 3 9 9 5 7 6 1 3 7 142000000 1923
1% 8% 32% 20% 2% 0% 0% 64%
15:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 15:00 13:00 18:00 17:00
1 0 3 8 1 3 1 8 6 1 0 1 1 2 6 1
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
383 13% 346 11% 492 16% 1790 59%
Summary 3011
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 20 24 24 28 30
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th 50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Thursday
8/29/2019
254
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_001

NB SB EB WB
1,519 1,492 00
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 0 0 4 4
0:15 1 4 0 0 5 3 0 2 5 0 0 5 5
0:30 1 2 0 0 3 1 7 1 4 0 0 3 1
0:45 1329 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 8 9 2 3 8 4 0 0 4 3 1 7 3
1:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 8 0 0 5 0
1:15 2 1 0 0 3 1 6 2 6 0 0 4 2
1:30 1 1 0 0 2 1 8 2 5 0 0 4 3
1:45 0413 0 0 17 1 8 7 4 2 0 9 9 0 0 3 8 1 7 3
2:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 9 2 7 0 0 5 6
2:15 1 1 0 0 2 2 8 2 1 0 0 4 9
2:30 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 4 5
2:45 0212 0 0 14 2 9 1 0 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 9 2 0 9
3:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 7 4 1 0 0 6 8
3:15 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 3 5 0 0 5 6
3:30 1 1 0 0 2 2 9 4 1 0 0 7 0
3:45 2402 0 0 26 3 6 1 1 3 2 0 1 3 7 0 0 5 6 2 5 0
4:00 3 1 0 0 4 3 0 3 7 0 0 6 7
4:15 2 0 0 0 2 2 8 3 4 0 0 6 2
4:30 7 1 0 0 8 2 9 2 5 0 0 5 4
4:45 4 16 3 5 0 0 7 21 25 112 23 119 0 0 48 231
5:00 7 2 0 0 9 2 4 4 8 0 0 7 2
5:15 9 0 0 0 9 3 7 4 7 0 0 8 4
5:30 14 2 0 0 16 27 33 0 0 60
5:45 19 49 1 5 0 0 20 54 18 106 27 155 0 0 45 261
6:00 12 2 0 0 14 16 27 0 0 43
6:15 23 7 0 0 30 24 36 0 0 60
6:30 18 6 0 0 24 16 20 0 0 36
6:45 36 89 9 24 0 0 45 113 18 74 29 112 0 0 47 186
7:00 23 16 0 0 39 16 17 0 0 33
7:15 31 11 0 0 42 21 24 0 0 45
7:30 42 9 0 0 51 7 27 0 0 34
7:45 43 139 21 57 0 0 64 196 8 52 25 93 0 0 33 145
8:00 2 9 2 3 0 0 5 2 9 1 8 0 0 2 7
8:15 39 19 0 0 58 16 28 0 0 44
8:30 19 19 0 0 38 14 21 0 0 35
8:45 21 108 18 79 0 0 39 187 4 43 28 95 0 0 32 138
9:00 2 0 1 3 0 0 3 3 9 1 0 0 0 1 9
9:15 1 9 1 4 0 0 3 3 8 1 5 0 0 2 3
9:30 2 5 2 3 0 0 4 8 6 1 4 0 0 2 0
9:45 22 86 10 60 0 0 32 146 1 24 11 50 0 0 12 74
10:00 2 4 1 8 0 0 4 2 3 8 0 0 1 1
10:15 1 4 1 2 0 0 2 6 5 6 0 0 1 1
10:30 2 1 2 7 0 0 4 8 3 7 0 0 1 0
10:45 25 84 12 69 0 0 37 153 6 17 9 30 0 0 15 47
11:00 2 1 2 0 0 0 4 1 8 6 0 0 1 4
11:15 21 25 0 0 46 4 4 0 0 8
11:30 26 17 0 0 43 4 4 0 0 8
11:45 34 102 25 87 0 0 59 189 4 20 2 16 0 0 6 36
TOTALS 686 402 1088 833 1090 1923
SPLIT % 63.1% 36.9% 36.1% 43.3% 56.7% 63.9%

NB SB EB WB
1,519 1,492 00
AM Peak Hour 7:30 11:15 7:30 15:30 17:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 153 89 225 123 155 264
Pk Hr Factor 0.890 0.890 0.879 0.854 0.807 0.786
7 ‐ 9 Volume 247 136 00 383 218 274 00 492
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:30 7:45 7:30 16:30 17:00 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 153 82 0 0 225 115 155 0 0 264 Pk Hr Factor 0.890 0.891 0.000 0.000 0.879 0.777 0.807 0.000 0.000 0.786 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,011
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
DAILY TOTALS Total
3,011
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd N/O China Garden Rd
Thursday
8/29/2019
255
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0022000000000 4
1:00 0000101000000 2
2:00 0000100000000 1
3:00 0001110000000 3
4:00 0003200000000 5
5:00 0016 1 021000000 20
6:00 026 1 7 2 160000000 52
7:00 14 1 6 4 2 4 870000000 118
8:00 03 1 5 4 3 3 0 1 10000000 102
9:00 108 3 4 2 270000000 72
10:00 128 2 4 2 670000000 68
11:00 11 1 1 3 1 3 5 1 32000000 94
12:00 PM 14 1 6 3 8 3 792000000 107
13:00 007 4 3 4 3 1 07000000 110
14:00 047 3 3 3 372000000 86
15:00 02 2 0 4 4 4 992000000 126
16:00 127 4 0 5 5 1 00000000 115
17:00 00 1 1 4 4 4 6 2 04000000 125
18:00 03 1 7 5 2 4 4 1 70000000 133
19:00 23 2 0 4 0 1 9 1 01000000 95
20:00 02 1 1 3 2 2 030000000 68
21:00 03 1 4 2 5 1 600000000 58
22:00 115 1 3 1 400000000 34
23:00 007 1 1430000000 25
9 36 209 618 577 152 22 1623
1% 2% 13% 38% 36% 9% 1% 100%
4 1 2 6 7 2 0 3 1 9 7 5 44000000 5 4 1
0% 1% 4% 13% 12% 3% 0% 33%
7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 4 1 6 4 3 4 8 1 3 2 1 1 8
5 2 4 1 4 2 4 1 5 3 8 0 9 8 1 8000000 1082
0% 1% 9% 26% 23% 6% 1% 67%
19:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 16:00 17:00 13:00 18:00
2 4 2 0 5 2 5 5 2 0 7 1 3 3
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
220 14% 217 13% 240 15% 946 58%
Summary
Street Name
Aguilar Rd
85th
34 95th
38 50thDirection
25 Friday
ADT
1623
Percentiles
30 Average
29 15th
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
8/23/2019
Summary
AM Peak Hour
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
All Speeds
Volume
PM Volumes
% PM
PM Peak Hour
Volume
Directional Peak Periods
256
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
819 804 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 9 0 0 3 2
0:15 1 1 0 0 2 1 7 1 3 0 0 3 0
0:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 5 0 0 2 5
0:45 1202 0 0 14 8 4 8 1 2 5 9 0 0 2 0 1 0 7
1:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 9 0 0 2 4
1:15 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 9 0 0 2 9
1:30 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 2 0 0 2 7
1:45 0101 0 0 2 8 5 8 2 2 5 2 0 0 3 0 1 1 0
2:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
2:15 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 0 0 2 7
2:30 0 0 0 0 1 5 7 0 0 2 2
2:45 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 9 48 8 38 0 0 17 86
3:00 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 4 1
3:15 0 0 0 0 1 9 1 7 0 0 3 6
3:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 2
3:45 1 3 0 0 0 1 3 10 52 17 74 0 0 27 126
4:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1
4:15 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 6 0 0 2 9
4:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 4 0 0 2 9
4:45 3 5 0 0 0 3 5 15 54 21 61 0 0 36 115
5:00 3 1 0 0 4 1 2 2 3 0 0 3 5
5:15 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 6
5:30 6 1 0 0 7 1 1 1 9 0 0 3 0
5:45 7 18 0 2 0 0 7 20 11 54 13 71 0 0 24 125
6:00 5 3 0 0 8 1 4 2 5 0 0 3 9
6:15 4 4 0 0 8 1 8 1 7 0 0 3 5
6:30 7 4 0 0 1 1 1 5 2 0 0 0 3 5
6:45 1 83 4 7 1 8 0 0 2 55 2 1 46 11 07 2 0 0 2 4 1 3 3 7:00 23 6 0 0 29 12 17 0 0 29
7:15 15 8 0 0 23 16 12 0 0 28
7:30 1 5 1 4 0 0 2 9 8 1 4 0 0 2 2
7:45 23 76 14 42 0 0 37 118 8 44 8 51 0 0 16 95
8:00 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 8 0 0 2 1
8:15 18 7 0 0 25 7 9 0 0 16
8:30 1 5 1 7 0 0 3 2 7 8 0 0 1 5
8:45 17 62 6 40 0 0 23 102 3 30 13 38 0 0 16 68
9:00 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 7 1 1 0 0 1 8
9:15 10 3 0 0 13 8 10 0 0 18
9:30 10 7 0 0 17 4 8 0 0 12
9:45 7 3 81 43 4 0 0 2 17 2 4 2 3 6 3 5 0 0 1 05 8
10:00 7 1 2 0 0 1 9 1 2 0 0 3
10:15 11 4 0 0 15 2 11 0 0 13
10:30 11 2 0 0 13 3 7 0 0 10
10:45 9 3 81 23 0 0 0 2 16 8 1 7 7 2 7 0 0 8 3 4
11:00 1 0 8 0 0 1 8 1 4 0 0 5
11:15 1 6 7 0 0 2 3 4 5 0 0 9
11:30 17 14 0 0 31 3 1 0 0 4
11:45 9 5 21 34 2 0 0 2 29 4 3 1 1 4 1 4 0 0 7 2 5
TOTALS 329 212 541 490 592 1082
SPLIT % 60.8% 39.2% 33.3% 45.3% 54.7% 66.7%

NB SB EB WB
819 804 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:00 11:45 7:00 16:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 76 60 118 62 79 137
Pk Hr Factor 0.826 0.789 0.797 0.775 0.859 0.951
7 ‐ 9 Volume 138 82 00 220 108 132 00 240
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:45 7:00 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 76 48 0 0 118 62 79 0 0 137
Pk Hr Factor 0.826 0.706 0.000 0.000 0.797 0.775 0.859 0.000 0.000 0.951 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
Total
1,623
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
22:00
22:15
22:30
22:45
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
23:00
DAILY TOTALS
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
19:30
19:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
21:45
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
16:45
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
13:45
14:00
14:15
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
13:15
13:30
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Friday
8/23/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,623
257
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0023230000000 10
1:00 0036400000000 13
2:00 0000300000000 3
3:00 0000100000000 1
4:00 0101100000000 3
5:00 0011110000000 4
6:00 0017621000000 17
7:00 0148 2 051000000 39
8:00 00 1 0 2 0 2 881000000 67
9:00 13 2 0 3 8 3 782000000 109
10:00 13 1 7 3 0 3 641000000 92
11:00 12 1 0 3 8 4 492000000 106
12:00 PM 10 1 3 3 2 5 1 1 52000000 114
13:00 04 1 3 3 5 4 753000000 107
14:00 00 1 6 5 8 4 5 1 03000000 132
15:00 20 1 7 3 5 3 9 1 02000000 105
16:00 02 1 0 3 6 3 772000000 94
17:00 13 1 2 3 7 3 8 1 00000000 101
18:00 116 4 3 1 761000000 75
19:00 00 1 2 2 5 1 970000000 63
20:00 01 1 4 1 8 1 361000000 53
21:00 005 2 4 1 400000000 43
22:00 003 1 5950000000 32
23:00 0047810000000 20
8 21 193 517 520 122 22 1403
1% 1% 14% 37% 37% 9% 2% 100%
3 1 0 6 8 1 5 2 1 8 3 4 08000000 4 6 4
0% 1% 5% 11% 13% 3% 1% 33%
9 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 3 2 0 3 8 4 4 9 2 1 0 9
5 1 1 1 2 5 3 6 5 3 3 7 8 2 1 4000000 9 3 9
0% 1% 9% 26% 24% 6% 1% 67%
15:00 13:00 15:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 13:00 14:00
2 4 1 7 5 8 5 1 1 5 3 1 3 2
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
106 8% 221 16% 195 14% 881 63%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Saturday
8/24/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1403
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 25 30 30 34
258
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
718 685 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 4 0 0 3 2
0:15 1 1 0 0 2 1 5 1 2 0 0 2 7
0:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 7 0 0 3 0
0:45 2367 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 5 6 1 5 5 8 0 0 2 5 1 1 4
1:00 2 6 0 0 8 1 9 1 9 0 0 3 8
1:15 0 0 0 0 1 3 9 0 0 2 2
1:30 1 3 0 0 4 8 1 1 0 0 1 9
1:45 1409 0 0 1 1 3 9 4 9 1 9 5 8 0 0 2 8 1 0 7
2:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 0 2 8
2:15 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 4 0 0 3 0
2:30 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 4 2
2:45 1122 0 0 33 1 5 6 5 1 7 6 7 0 0 3 2 1 3 2
3:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 9 0 0 3 0
3:15 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 3
3:30 0 0 0 0 8 1 4 0 0 2 2
3:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 44 18 61 0 0 30 105
4:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 2 4
4:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1
4:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 0 2 7
4:45 2 3 0 0 0 2 3 12 49 10 45 0 0 22 94
5:00 1 0 0 0 1 1 6 1 2 0 0 2 8
5:15 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 6 0 0 3 1
5:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 2
5:45 1311 0 0 24 1 1 5 2 9 4 9 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
6:00 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 8 0 0 2 0
6:15 3 0 0 0 3 1 1 7 0 0 1 8
6:30 2 2 0 0 4 9 1 0 0 0 1 9
6:45 8 14 1 3 0 0 9 17 9 41 9 34 0 0 18 75
7:00 3 1 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 1 6
7:15 8 3 0 0 1 1 9 9 0 0 1 8
7:30 9 3 0 0 1 2 6 9 0 0 1 5
7:45 7 27 5 12 0 0 12 39 6 27 8 36 0 0 14 63
8:00 4 7 0 0 1 1 4 9 0 0 1 3
8:15 12 7 0 0 19 5 7 0 0 12
8:30 10 5 0 0 15 6 10 0 0 16
8:45 15 41 7 26 0 0 22 67 5 20 7 33 0 0 12 53
9:00 16 8 0 0 24 4 6 0 0 10
9:15 20 9 0 0 29 7 5 0 0 12
9:30 1 4 1 2 0 0 2 6 3 7 0 0 1 0
9:45 17 67 13 42 0 0 30 109 8 22 3 21 0 0 11 43
10:00 10 10 0 0 20 1 3 0 0 4
10:15 13 6 0 0 19 3 7 0 0 10
10:30 14 16 0 0 30 4 5 0 0 9
10:45 12 49 11 43 0 0 23 92 6 14 3 18 0 0 9 32
11:00 1 1 9 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 0 8
11:15 13 12 0 0 25 3 5 0 0 8
11:30 14 11 0 0 25 0 3 0 0 3
11:45 24 62 12 44 0 0 36 106 0 5 1 15 0 0 1 20
TOTALS 274 190 464 444 495 939
SPLIT % 59.1% 40.9% 33.1% 47.3% 52.7% 66.9%

NB SB EB WB
718 685 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:30 11:45 11:45 14:00 14:15 14:15
AM Pk Volume 71 55 125 65 70 134
Pk Hr Factor 0.740 0.809 0.868 0.739 0.875 0.798
7 ‐ 9 Volume 68 38 00 106 101 94 00 195
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 8:00 8:00 8:00 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 41 26 0 0 67 58 50 0 0 108
Pk Hr Factor 0.683 0.929 0.000 0.000 0.761 0.906 0.781 0.000 0.000 0.871 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,403
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Saturday
8/24/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,403
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
259
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0153330000000 15
1:00 0057300000000 15
2:00 0013200000000 6
3:00 0001200000000 3
4:00 0000000000000 0
5:00 0001100000000 2
6:00 0012500000000 8
7:00 0034 1 111000000 20
8:00 001 2 1 2 020000000 44
9:00 024 3 2 2 951000000 73
10:00 007 2 8 3 7 1 21000000 85
11:00 012 2 7 2 341000000 58
12:00 PM 10 1 6 2 9 3 7 1 10000000 94
13:00 01 1 8 4 0 4 682000000 115
14:00 01 1 4 3 5 3 2 1 21000000 95
15:00 225 3 5 3 562000000 87
16:00 01 1 0 2 7 3 4 1 10000000 83
17:00 005 3 2 3 7 1 51000000 90
18:00 019 2 9 3 381000000 81
19:00 01 1 1 2 0 2 260000000 60
20:00 03 1 0 1 8 1 491000000 55
21:00 016 1 5620000000 30
22:00 0038610000000 18
23:00 1024221000000 12
4 15 138 421 440 118 13 1149
0% 1% 12% 37% 38% 10% 1% 100%
04 2 9 1 2 9 1 3 6 2 74000000 3 2 9
0% 3% 11% 12% 2% 0% 29%
9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 2 7 3 2 3 7 1 2 1 8 5
4 1 1 1 0 9 2 9 2 3 0 4 9 19000000 8 2 0
0% 1% 9% 25% 26% 8% 1% 71%
15:00 20:00 13:00 13:00 13:00 17:00 13:00 13:00
2 3 1 8 4 0 4 6 1 5 2 1 1 5
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
64 6% 209 18% 173 15% 703 61%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Sunday
8/25/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1149
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 25 30 30 35
260
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
567 582 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 1 1 0 0 2 1 8 1 3 0 0 3 1
0:15 2 3 0 0 5 9 1 4 0 0 2 3
0:30 0 4 0 0 4 6 1 4 0 0 2 0
0:45 1 4 3 11 0 0 4 15 6 39 14 55 0 0 20 94
1:00 0 5 0 0 5 1 5 1 8 0 0 3 3
1:15 0 4 0 0 4 1 7 1 4 0 0 3 1
1:30 1 2 0 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 2
1:45 3 4 0 1 1 0 0 3 1 5 1 45 81 55 7 0 0 2 9 1 1 5
2:00 1 3 0 0 4 6 1 0 0 0 1 6
2:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 2 4
2:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 2 4
2:45 2303 0 0 26 1 4 4 1 1 7 5 4 0 0 3 1 9 5
3:00 1 1 0 0 2 9 9 0 0 1 8
3:15 0 1 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 1 8
3:30 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 1 9
3:45 0102 0 0 3 1 5 3 9 1 7 4 8 0 0 3 2 8 7
4:00 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 8
4:15 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 1
4:30 0 0 0 0 1 7 7 0 0 2 4
4:45 0 0 0 0 8 4 41 23 9 0 0 2 08 3
5:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 2 0
5:15 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 8 0 0 3 0
5:30 0 1 0 0 1 8 1 5 0 0 2 3
5:45 1101 0 0 12 6 3 7 1 1 5 3 0 0 1 7 9 0
6:00 1 2 0 0 3 6 1 4 0 0 2 0
6:15 1 0 0 0 1 8 1 2 0 0 2 0
6:30 2 0 0 0 2 1 4 7 0 0 2 1
6:45 1513 0 0 28 1 0 3 8 1 0 4 3 0 0 2 0 8 1
7:00 2 1 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 1 5
7:15 4 1 0 0 5 8 7 0 0 1 5
7:30 3 2 0 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 1 6
7:45 5 1 4 2 6 0 0 7 2 0 4 2 71 03 3 0 0 1 46 0
8:00 3 4 0 0 7 8 7 0 0 1 5
8:15 8 2 0 0 1 0 4 1 2 0 0 1 6
8:30 8 2 0 0 1 0 4 8 0 0 1 2
8:45 13 32 4 12 0 0 17 44 3 19 9 36 0 0 12 55
9:00 17 5 0 0 22 4 7 0 0 11
9:15 6 6 0 0 1 2 4 3 0 0 7
9:30 9 8 0 0 1 7 3 5 0 0 8
9:45 16 48 6 25 0 0 22 73 1 12 3 18 0 0 4 30
10:00 1 2 8 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 6
10:15 17 11 0 0 28 1 3 0 0 4
10:30 1 3 4 0 0 1 7 1 2 0 0 3
10:45 14 56 6 29 0 0 20 85 3 7 2 11 0 0 5 18
11:00 1 0 8 0 0 1 8 1 1 0 0 2
11:15 6 4 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 7
11:30 8 7 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2
11:45 1 1 3 5 4 2 3 0 0 1 5 5 8 1309 0 0 1 1 2
TOTALS 203 126 329 364 456 820
SPLIT % 61.7% 38.3% 28.6% 44.4% 55.6% 71.4%

NB SB EB WB
567 582 0 0
AM Peak Hour 9:45 11:45 11:45 13:00 12:15 13:00
AM Pk Volume 58 45 89 58 60 115
Pk Hr Factor 0.853 0.804 0.718 0.853 0.833 0.871
7 ‐ 9 Volume 46 18 00 64 81 92 00 173
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 8:00 8:00 8:00 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 32 12 0 0 44 48 54 0 0 94
Pk Hr Factor 0.615 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.647 0.706 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.783 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,149
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Sunday
8/25/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,149
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
261
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0022000000000 4
1:00 0001100000000 2
2:00 0000000000000 0
3:00 0100110100000 4
4:00 0013400000000 8
5:00 0004531000000 13
6:00 018 1 7 1 751000000 49
7:00 02 1 0 4 0 4 2 1 21000000 107
8:00 03 1 3 4 4 3 9 1 20000000 111
9:00 028 2 9 2 3 1 30000000 75
10:00 13 1 3 2 6 2 690000000 78
11:00 01 1 5 2 7 2 9 1 30100000 86
12:00 PM 13 1 1 3 5 4 2 1 32000000 107
13:00 05 1 7 3 9 3 8 1 42000000 115
14:00 25 2 1 3 6 3 690000000 109
15:00 01 1 0 3 0 2 8 1 40100000 84
16:00 009 3 0 4 3 1 43000000 99
17:00 10 1 3 5 8 5 790000000 138
18:00 12 1 1 3 6 3 082000000 90
19:00 134 3 3 3 021000000 74
20:00 02 1 3 1 7 2 151000000 59
21:00 045 1 3 1 031000000 36
22:00 0043320000000 12
23:00 0042100000000 7
7 38 192 525 526 161 15 3 1467
0% 3% 13% 36% 36% 11% 1% 0% 100%
1 1 3 7 0 1 9 3 1 8 7 6 83200000 5 3 7
0% 1% 5% 13% 13% 5% 0% 0% 37%
1 0 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 5 : 0 0 3 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 1 3 1 5 4 4 4 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1
6 2 5 1 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 9 9 3 1 2100000 9 3 0
0% 2% 8% 23% 23% 6% 1% 0% 63%
14:00 13:00 14:00 17:00 17:00 13:00 16:00 15:00 17:00
2 5 2 1 5 8 5 7 1 4 3 1 1 3 8
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
218 15% 222 15% 237 16% 790 54%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Monday
8/26/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1467
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 25 30 30 35
262
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
758 709 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 1 9
0:15 1 2 0 0 3 1 8 1 5 0 0 3 3
0:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 8 9 0 0 2 7
0:45 0202 0 0 4 1 5 6 3 1 3 4 4 0 0 2 8 1 0 7
1:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 2 6
1:15 1 1 0 0 2 1 3 1 9 0 0 3 2
1:30 0 0 0 0 1 8 6 0 0 2 4
1:45 0101 0 0 2 1 4 5 5 1 9 6 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 5
2:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 0 0 2 7
2:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0
2:30 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2
2:45 0 0 0 0 14 59 16 50 0 0 30 109
3:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 0 0 2 0
3:15 0 1 0 0 1 6 1 2 0 0 1 8
3:30 2 0 0 0 2 9 1 4 0 0 2 3
3:45 1301 0 0 14 1 4 4 1 9 4 3 0 0 2 3 8 4
4:00 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 0 0 2 0
4:15 4 0 0 0 4 8 1 5 0 0 2 3
4:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 3
4:45 3701 0 0 38 1 5 4 7 1 8 5 2 0 0 3 3 9 9
5:00 3 0 0 0 3 9 1 8 0 0 2 7
5:15 3 0 0 0 3 1 7 2 5 0 0 4 2
5:30 6 0 0 0 6 1 9 1 6 0 0 3 5
5:45 1 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 25 72 28 1 0 0 3 4 1 3 8
6:00 4 0 0 0 4 1 1 9 0 0 2 0
6:15 12 4 0 0 16 9 12 0 0 21
6:30 8 5 0 0 1 3 9 1 8 0 0 2 7
6:45 10 34 6 15 0 0 16 49 5 34 17 56 0 0 22 90
7:00 17 4 0 0 21 5 8 0 0 13
7:15 24 3 0 0 27 8 16 0 0 24
7:30 1 4 1 4 0 0 2 8 5 1 5 0 0 2 0
7:45 24 79 7 28 0 0 31 107 11 29 6 45 0 0 17 74
8:00 1 9 1 6 0 0 3 5 9 4 0 0 1 3
8:15 1 5 1 3 0 0 2 8 7 1 5 0 0 2 2
8:30 19 8 0 0 27 6 13 0 0 19
8:45 12 65 9 46 0 0 21 111 1 23 4 36 0 0 5 59
9:00 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 1 3
9:15 7 7 0 0 1 4 4 7 0 0 1 1
9:30 8 5 0 0 1 3 3 3 0 0 6
9:45 17 45 8 30 0 0 25 75 0 10 6 26 0 0 6 36
10:00 1 3 5 0 0 1 8 0 6 0 0 6
10:15 8 8 0 0 1 6 2 1 0 0 3
10:30 1 2 8 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2
10:45 7 4 0 1 7 3 8 0 0 2 4 7 8 1309 0 0 1 1 2
11:00 6 1 3 0 0 1 9 1 1 0 0 2
11:15 1 2 6 0 0 1 8 0 3 0 0 3
11:30 15 10 0 0 25 0 1 0 0 1
11:45 1 3 4 6 1 1 4 0 0 0 2 4 8 6 1205 0 0 17
TOTALS 335 202 537 423 507 930
SPLIT % 62.4% 37.6% 36.6% 45.5% 54.5% 63.4%

NB SB EB WB
758 709 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:15 7:30 7:30 13:30 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 81 50 122 66 81 138
Pk Hr Factor 0.844 0.781 0.871 0.825 0.810 0.821
7 ‐ 9 Volume 144 74 00 218 104 133 00 237
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:15 7:30 7:30 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 81 50 0 0 122 60 81 0 0 138
Pk Hr Factor 0.844 0.781 0.000 0.000 0.871 0.789 0.810 0.000 0.000 0.821 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,467
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Monday
8/26/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,467
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
263
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0000000000000 0
1:00 0001000000000 1
2:00 0002200000000 4
3:00 0001010000000 2
4:00 0011210000000 5
5:00 0028 1 131000000 25
6:00 10 1 2 1 8 1 410000000 46
7:00 03 2 3 4 8 4 182000000 125
8:00 18 1 6 3 4 2 892000000 98
9:00 14 1 8 3 0 2 591000000 88
10:00 127 2 7 2 572000000 71
11:00 01 1 4 3 2 2 170000000 75
12:00 PM 13 1 0 2 5 3 3 1 22000000 86
13:00 31 1 3 2 8 3 7 1 11000000 94
14:00 01 1 2 3 2 3 691000000 91
15:00 02 1 6 5 0 4 4 1 61000000 129
16:00 21 1 5 4 7 3 981000000 113
17:00 027 5 0 5 4 1 90000000 132
18:00 03 1 0 3 6 3 6 1 41000000 100
19:00 24 1 4 3 7 2 751000000 90
20:00 30 1 0 3 0 1 871000000 69
21:00 026 1 7 1 430000000 42
22:00 0016340000000 14
23:00 0011220000000 6
15 37 208 561 512 156 17 1506
1% 2% 14% 37% 34% 10% 1% 100%
4 1 8 9 3 2 0 2 1 6 9 4 68000000 5 4 0
0% 1% 6% 13% 11% 3% 1% 36%
6 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 8 2 3 4 8 4 1 9 2 1 2 5
1 1 1 9 1 1 5 3 5 9 3 4 3 1 1 09000000 9 6 6
1% 1% 8% 24% 23% 7% 1% 64%
13:00 19:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 12:00 17:00
3 4 1 6 5 0 5 4 1 9 2 1 3 2
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
223 15% 180 12% 245 16% 858 57%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Tuesday
8/27/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1506
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 24 29 29 34
264
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
772 734 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 1 9
0:15 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 1 8
0:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 5 0 0 2 8
0:45 0 0 0 0 14 43 7 43 0 0 21 86
1:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 2
1:15 0 0 0 0 1 4 9 0 0 2 3
1:30 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 6 0 0 2 8
1:45 0 0 1 0 0 1 12 48 9 46 0 0 21 94
2:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 2 4
2:15 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 0 0 2 6
2:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 8 0 0 2 0
2:45 2202 0 0 24 1 1 5 8 1 0 3 3 0 0 2 1 9 1
3:00 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 2 3 0 0 3 6
3:15 0 0 0 0 1 5 2 2 0 0 3 7
3:30 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 6 0 0 3 0
3:45 1101 0 0 12 1 4 5 6 1 2 7 3 0 0 2 6 1 2 9
4:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
4:15 1 0 0 0 1 1 6 9 0 0 2 5
4:30 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 8 0 0 3 1
4:45 3411 0 0 45 1 9 5 8 1 8 5 5 0 0 3 7 1 1 3
5:00 5 1 0 0 6 1 1 1 4 0 0 2 5
5:15 4 0 0 0 4 1 9 2 0 0 0 3 9
5:30 8 0 0 0 8 1 7 1 7 0 0 3 4
5:45 5 22 2 3 0 0 7 25 12 59 22 73 0 0 34 132
6:00 5 2 0 0 7 8 1 5 0 0 2 3
6:15 6 3 0 0 9 1 6 1 5 0 0 3 1
6:30 10 4 0 0 14 4 12 0 0 16
6:45 1 23 3 4 1 3 0 0 1 64 6 1 34 11 75 9 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 7:00 25 6 0 0 31 9 17 0 0 26
7:15 24 10 0 0 34 10 14 0 0 24
7:30 1 4 1 1 0 0 2 5 6 1 0 0 0 1 6
7:45 24 87 11 38 0 0 35 125 12 37 12 53 0 0 24 90
8:00 1 6 1 0 0 0 2 6 5 1 2 0 0 1 7
8:15 1 8 1 2 0 0 3 0 7 1 0 0 0 1 7
8:30 9 8 0 0 1 7 8 1 4 0 0 2 2
8:45 14 57 11 41 0 0 25 98 3 23 10 46 0 0 13 69
9:00 1 3 1 6 0 0 2 9 5 1 0 0 0 1 5
9:15 1 3 1 2 0 0 2 5 3 8 0 0 1 1
9:30 9 7 0 0 1 6 3 5 0 0 8
9:45 15 50 3 38 0 0 18 88 0 11 8 31 0 0 8 42
10:00 8 5 0 0 1 3 0 6 0 0 6
10:15 1 3 6 0 0 1 9 2 1 0 0 3
10:30 7 9 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 1
10:45 13 41 10 30 0 0 23 71 1 3 3 11 0 0 4 14
11:00 1 1 6 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 1
11:15 6 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1
11:30 6 9 0 0 1 5 2 2 0 0 4
11:45 1 3 3 6 1 0 3 9 0 0 2 3 7 5 0204 0 0 6
TOTALS 333 207 540 439 527 966
SPLIT % 61.7% 38.3% 35.9% 45.4% 54.6% 64.1%

NB SB EB WB
772 734 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:00 8:15 7:00 16:45 17:15 16:45
AM Pk Volume 87 47 125 66 74 135
Pk Hr Factor 0.870 0.734 0.893 0.868 0.841 0.865
7 ‐ 9 Volume 144 79 00 223 117 128 00 245
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:30 7:00 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 87 44 0 0 125 66 73 0 0 135
Pk Hr Factor 0.870 0.917 0.000 0.000 0.893 0.868 0.830 0.000 0.000 0.865 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,506
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Tuesday
8/27/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,506
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
265
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0030000000000 3
1:00 0002000000000 2
2:00 0001010000000 2
3:00 0010011000000 3
4:00 0003200000000 5
5:00 0015 1 020000000 18
6:00 03 1 2 1 5 1 420000000 46
7:00 13 1 5 4 3 4 670000000 115
8:00 139 4 6 4 071000000 107
9:00 128 2 7 1 680000000 62
10:00 016 2 7 2 080000000 62
11:00 03 1 0 3 0 2 9 1 42000000 88
12:00 PM 22 1 0 3 1 3 462000000 87
13:00 21 1 4 3 1 2 981000000 86
14:00 22 1 7 4 5 3 880000000 112
15:00 107 3 8 4 5 1 13000000 105
16:00 02 1 2 4 1 3 9 1 30000000 107
17:00 006 5 8 5 8 1 43000000 139
18:00 10 1 2 3 6 2 680000000 83
19:00 05 1 1 3 1 2 391000000 80
20:00 01 1 2 4 1 3 251000000 92
21:00 001 2 1 1 531000000 41
22:00 0028641000000 21
23:00 1023210000000 9
12 28 171 583 524 140 17 1475
1% 2% 12% 40% 36% 9% 1% 100%
3 1 5 6 5 1 9 9 1 7 7 5 04000000 5 1 3
0% 1% 4% 13% 12% 3% 0% 35%
7 : 0 0 6 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 8 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 3 1 5 4 6 4 6 1 4 2 1 1 5
9 1 3 1 0 6 3 8 4 3 4 7 9 0 1 3000000 9 6 2
1% 1% 7% 26% 24% 6% 1% 65%
12:00 19:00 14:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 15:00 17:00
2 5 1 7 5 8 5 8 1 4 3 1 3 9
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
222 15% 173 12% 246 17% 834 57%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Wednesday
8/28/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1475
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 25 30 29 34
266
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
751 724 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 0 0 1 9
0:15 0 1 0 0 1 9 6 0 0 1 5
0:30 1 1 0 0 2 1 4 1 8 0 0 3 2
0:45 0102 0 0 3 1 2 4 7 9 4 0 0 0 2 1 8 7
1:00 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 0 0 2 1
1:15 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 8
1:30 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 2
1:45 0101 0 0 2 1 2 4 4 1 3 4 2 0 0 2 5 8 6
2:00 0 0 0 0 9 1 6 0 0 2 5
2:15 0 0 0 0 1 4 9 0 0 2 3
2:30 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 0
2:45 1111 0 0 22 1 3 6 6 1 1 4 6 0 0 2 4 1 1 2
3:00 0 0 0 0 9 2 1 0 0 3 0
3:15 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 9 0 0 3 3
3:30 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 3
3:45 2201 0 0 23 8 4 4 1 1 6 1 0 0 1 9 1 0 5
4:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
4:15 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 1 9 0 0 3 4
4:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 8 0 0 1 9
4:45 3 5 0 0 0 3 5 17 53 17 54 0 0 34 107
5:00 3 0 0 0 3 1 3 2 1 0 0 3 4
5:15 2 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 8 0 0 3 3
5:30 8 0 0 0 8 2 0 1 6 0 0 3 6
5:45 5 1 8 0 0 0 5 1 8 1 86 61 87 3 0 0 3 6 1 3 9
6:00 5 2 0 0 7 1 1 1 4 0 0 2 5
6:15 7 1 0 0 8 7 1 2 0 0 1 9
6:30 12 2 0 0 14 10 14 0 0 24
6:45 11 35 6 11 0 0 17 46 4 32 11 51 0 0 15 83
7:00 25 3 0 0 28 2 18 0 0 20
7:15 19 8 0 0 27 8 9 0 0 17
7:30 1 8 1 4 0 0 3 2 9 1 9 0 0 2 8
7:45 18 80 10 35 0 0 28 115 6 25 9 55 0 0 15 80
8:00 1 5 1 2 0 0 2 7 7 1 2 0 0 1 9
8:15 2 0 1 4 0 0 3 4 5 1 2 0 0 1 7
8:30 15 7 0 0 22 17 17 0 0 34
8:45 10 60 14 47 0 0 24 107 12 41 10 51 0 0 22 92
9:00 12 5 0 0 17 3 11 0 0 14
9:15 7 1 3 0 0 2 0 1 8 0 0 9
9:30 11 5 0 0 16 6 8 0 0 14
9:45 63 632 6 0 0 96 2 21 222 9 0 0 44 1
10:00 5 6 0 0 1 1 1 7 0 0 8
10:15 1 2 7 0 0 1 9 2 2 0 0 4
10:30 5 9 0 0 1 4 2 2 0 0 4
10:45 13 35 5 27 0 0 18 62 1 6 4 15 0 0 5 21
11:00 9 8 0 0 1 7 1 2 0 0 3
11:15 10 16 0 0 26 0 1 0 0 1
11:30 6 9 0 0 1 5 0 5 0 0 5
11:45 1 5 4 0 1 5 4 8 0 0 3 0 8 8 0108 0 0 9
TOTALS 314 199 513 437 525 962
SPLIT % 61.2% 38.8% 34.8% 45.4% 54.6% 65.2%

NB SB EB WB
751 724 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:00 7:30 7:30 14:00 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 80 50 121 66 73 139
Pk Hr Factor 0.800 0.893 0.890 0.550 0.869 0.965
7 ‐ 9 Volume 140 82 00 222 119 127 00 246
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:30 7:30 17:00 17:00 17:00
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 80 50 0 0 121 66 73 0 0 139
Pk Hr Factor 0.800 0.893 0.000 0.000 0.890 0.825 0.869 0.000 0.000 0.965 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,475
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Wednesday
8/28/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,475
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
267
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002
Time < 15 15 ‐ 19 20 ‐ 24 25 ‐ 29 30 ‐ 34 35 ‐ 39 40 ‐ 44 45 ‐ 49 50 ‐ 5 4 55 ‐ 59 60 ‐ 64 65 ‐ 69 70 + Total 0:00 AM 0111200000000 5
1:00 1000000000000 1
2:00 0001100000000 2
3:00 0000010000000 1
4:00 1011000000000 3
5:00 0017 1 050000000 23
6:00 00 1 1 2 3 2 221000000 59
7:00 02 1 4 4 8 4 6 1 31000000 124
8:00 119 3 5 2 9 1 24000000 91
9:00 06 1 4 2 4 1 770000000 68
10:00 11 1 5 2 0 2 160000000 64
11:00 054 2 4 2 3 1 16000000 73
12:00 PM 009 2 4 2 6 1 11000000 71
13:00 02 1 1 2 5 2 772000000 74
14:00 108 3 7 3 4 1 02000000 92
15:00 16 1 4 4 9 4 4 1 12000000 127
16:00 00 1 4 4 1 4 370000000 105
17:00 11 1 0 5 3 5 1 1 72000000 135
18:00 02 1 1 3 8 3 2 1 20000000 95
19:00 00 1 0 3 6 2 662000000 80
20:00 21 1 4 3 1 2 121000000 72
21:00 219 1 5520000000 34
22:00 005 1 2410000000 22
23:00 0137000000000 11
11 30 188 552 484 143 24 1432
1% 2% 13% 39% 34% 10% 2% 100%
4 1 6 7 0 1 8 4 1 7 1 5 7 1 2000000 5 1 4
0% 1% 5% 13% 12% 4% 1% 36%
1 : 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 7 : 0 0 1 6 1 5 4 8 4 6 1 3 6 1 2 4
7 1 4 1 1 8 3 6 8 3 1 3 8 6 1 2000000 9 1 8
0% 1% 8% 26% 22% 6% 1% 64%
20:00 15:00 15:00 17:00 17:00 17:00 13:00 17:00
2 6 1 4 5 3 5 1 1 7 2 1 3 5
AM 7‐9 NOON 12‐2 PM 4‐6 Off Peak Volumes
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
215 15% 145 10% 240 17% 832 58%
Summary
PM Volumes
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
SPEED
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Thursday
8/29/2019
50th
Volume
Summary
Totals
% of Totals
AM Volumes
% AM
AM Peak Hour
Volume
38 % PM
PM Peak Hour
Directional Peak Periods
All Speeds
Street Name Direction Percentiles
15th
1432
Average 85th 95th ADT
Aguilar Rd 25 29 29 35
268
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day: City: Rocklin
Date: Project #: CA19_7280_002

NB SB EB WB
730 702 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
0:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 9 0 0 2 4
0:15 1 3 0 0 4 4 8 0 0 1 2
0:30 0 1 0 0 1 9 5 0 0 1 4
0:45 0104 0 0 5 1 1 3 9 1 0 3 2 0 0 2 1 7 1
1:00 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 8
1:15 1 0 0 0 1 7 1 3 0 0 2 0
1:30 0 0 0 0 7 1 5 0 0 2 2
1:45 010 0 0 1 9 3 1 5 4 3 0 0 1 4 7 4
2:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 2 4
2:15 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 5 0 0 1 9
2:30 0 0 0 0 1 7 9 0 0 2 6
2:45 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 1 35 41 03 8 0 0 2 39 2
3:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 4 2
3:15 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 7 0 0 3 0
3:30 0 0 0 0 1 9 1 2 0 0 3 1
3:45 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 14 58 10 69 0 0 24 127
4:00 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 2 4
4:15 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 5 0 0 3 3
4:30 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 0 0 2 5
4:45 0201 0 0 3 1 4 5 5 9 5 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 5
5:00 6 1 0 0 7 2 0 2 5 0 0 4 5
5:15 2 0 0 0 2 1 7 2 4 0 0 4 1
5:30 4 0 0 0 4 9 1 7 0 0 2 6
5:45 9 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 02 3 1 05 61 37 9 0 0 2 3 1 3 5
6:00 3 0 0 0 3 8 1 7 0 0 2 5
6:15 17 1 0 0 18 9 21 0 0 30
6:30 9 2 0 0 1 1 7 7 0 0 1 4
6:45 1 94 8 8 1 1 0 0 2 75 9 1 33 71 35 8 0 0 2 69 5
7:00 20 9 0 0 29 8 13 0 0 21
7:15 19 8 0 0 27 7 14 0 0 21
7:30 1 8 1 1 0 0 2 9 5 1 5 0 0 2 0
7:45 24 81 15 43 0 0 39 124 6 26 12 54 0 0 18 80
8:00 1 6 1 0 0 0 2 6 3 1 2 0 0 1 5
8:15 19 10 0 0 29 11 14 0 0 25
8:30 9 9 0 0 1 8 5 1 1 0 0 1 6
8:45 8 52 10 39 0 0 18 91 5 24 11 48 0 0 16 72
9:00 1 1 9 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 0 7
9:15 8 5 0 0 1 3 3 1 2 0 0 1 5
9:30 8 1 1 0 0 1 9 4 4 0 0 8
9:45 10 37 6 31 0 0 16 68 2 12 2 22 0 0 4 34
10:00 10 10 0 0 20 3 5 0 0 8
10:15 6 6 0 0 1 2 2 3 0 0 5
10:30 8 7 0 0 1 5 2 2 0 0 4
10:45 13 37 4 27 0 0 17 64 3 10 2 12 0 0 5 22
11:00 7 7 0 0 1 4 1 2 0 0 3
11:15 8 9 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 1
11:30 9 4 0 0 1 3 1 3 0 0 4
11:45 1 9 4 3 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 9 7 3 2417 0 0 3 1 1
TOTALS 324 190 514 406 512 918
SPLIT % 63.0% 37.0% 35.9% 44.2% 55.8% 64.1%

NB SB EB WB
730 702 0 0
AM Peak Hour 7:00 7:30 7:00 16:15 17:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 81 46 124 65 79 135
Pk Hr Factor 0.844 0.767 0.795 0.813 0.790 0.750
7 ‐ 9 Volume 133 82 00 215 111 129 00 240
7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 7:00 7:30 7:00 16:15 17:00 16:45
7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 81 46 0 0 124 65 79 0 0 135
Pk Hr Factor 0.844 0.767 0.000 0.000 0.795 0.813 0.790 0.000 0.000 0.750 DAILY TOTALS Total
1,432
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
VOLUME
Aguilar Rd S/O Arrowhead Dr
Thursday
8/29/2019
13:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
13:00
13:15
13:30
16:45
14:00
14:15
14:30
14:45
15:00
15:15
15:30
15:45
16:00
16:15
16:30
19:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
18:00
18:15
18:30
18:45
19:00
19:15
19:30
22:45
20:00
20:15
20:30
20:45
21:00
21:15
21:30
21:45
22:00
22:15
22:30
PM Pk Volume
23:00
23:15
23:30
23:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %

DAILY TOTALS
4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour
4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,432
PM Peak Hour
Pk Hr Factor
4 ‐ 6 Volume
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
From: [email protected]
To: Nathan Anderson
Subject: City Council Communication fro Granite Lakes DA Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 12:49:47 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

To Members of the Rocklin City Council:

Please consider my request below to modifying the Granite Lakes Estates Development to be heard on April 14, 2024

The applicant team is aware of several concerns raised by members of the public during the Planning Commission hearing regarding proposed Item #8. Commenters noted that unforeseen issues during construction of the bridge abutments, such as the discovery of cultural or archaeological resources, could delay completion of the bridge.

In such a scenario, tying the issuance of additional building permits to the commencement of bridge abutment construction could allow residential development to proceed, even if bridge construction is stalled.

In response to these concerns, our team is proposing to revise the language of Item #8, as reflected in the highlighted text below. The revised language would instead tie the issuance of additional building permits to completion of the bridge abutments, rather than the commencement of construction.

This modification is intended to better align the timing of residential development with meaningful progress on the bridge, thereby addressing public concerns while still allowing the project to move forward in a coordinated manner.

8. Timing of Extension of Monument Springs Drive and Construction of Monument Springs Drive Bridge/Issuance of Building Permits and Certificates of Occupancy. Notwithstanding Project Approvals requiring the extension of Monument Spring Drive and construction of Monument Springs Bridge before the 49th building permit, the Parties agree that the building permit for the 49th residential dwelling and all such subsequent building permits may be issued upon
commencement completion of construction of the abutments for the Monument Springs Drive Bridge and there shall be no restriction on issuance of certificates of occupancy thereafter. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, there shall be no restrictions on issuance of up to six (6) model home building permits and temporary certificates of occupancy 276
therefor. The City Manager shall have authority to permit issuance of an additional two (2) model home building permits (for a total of eight (8)) and temporary certificates of occupancy therefor without further amendment to this Agreement upon a showing of good cause by Landowner.

On behalf of Granite Lakes Estates,

Nicholas G Alexander

277

Page 1 of 2 ends

Rocklin City CouncilApril 14, 2026

Rocklin City Council
April 14, 2026