Policy OCR-12: Provide for park and other outdoor recreational needs, both active and passive, through methods including but not limited to: collection of park user fees, dedication of parkland, or a combination of both; rehabilitation of existing park and recreation fac ilities; requiring the installation of park improvements; and requiring that financial mechanisms be created for long-term park and/or open space operation and maintenance.
Policy OCR-13: Require dedication of parkland, payment of in lieu fees for parkland, or a combination of both, as a condition of approval in the early stages of the development process, including approval of rezonings, where it is necessary to insure consistency with or implementation of the goals and policies contained in this General Plan.
Policy OCR-22: Require new development to mitigate its impact on park development and maintenance.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to public services are included in the GP EIR. 337
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 144
6.16. RECREATION
Project
Impact
that is
Peculiar to
the
Project or
the
Project
Site
Significant
Impact not
Analyzed
as
Significant
in the
Prior EIR
Potentially
Significant
Off-site or
Cumulative
Impact not
Discussed
in the prior
EIR
Adverse
Impact
More
Severe
based on
Substantial
New
Information
No New
Impact
Not
Previously
Analyzed
in the
Prior EIR
a) Would the project
increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational
facilities such that
substantial physical
deterioration of the facility
would occur or be
accelerated?
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the GP EIR
The General Plan EIR analyzed the anticipated impacts on the demand for recreation facilities as a result of the future urban development that was contemplated by the General Plan. These impacts included increased demand for parks and recreation (City of R ocklin General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2011, pages
4.12-30 through 4.12-45). The analysis found that while development and buildout of the General Plan can result in recreation facilities impacts, these impacts would be reduced to a less than significant le vel through the application of General Plan goals and policies that would assist in minimizing or avoiding impacts to recreation facilities. The General Plan has established a parkland standard of five acres per 1,000 population and has adopted goals and policies to insure that this standard is met. These goals and policies call for the provision of new park and recreational facilities as needed by new development through parkland dedication and the payment of park and recreation fees. These programs and practices are recognized in the General Plan Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element, which mitigates these impacts to a less than significant level.).
338
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 145
Project-Specific Impacts
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that physical deterioration of the facility would be accelerated? b) Require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impact 4.12.4.1 and was determined to have a less-than-significant impact through compliance of developer fees (Quimby Act), payment of development impact fees and/or dedication of parkland or in-lieu fees, as well as implementation of the General Plan policies (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.12-39 through 4.12-42).
As described in the GP EIR, the City of Rocklin determined that development of new park facilities would keep pace with anticipated population growth. The proposed Project would construct 281 multifamily residential units on a site that is currently vacant and undeveloped. As described in Section 6.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project is consistent with the land use designation for the site and is therefore consistent with the anticipated growth within the city. Thus, the city has adequate parkland available to serve the proposed Project.
In accordance with the City of Rocklin’s Park Improvement Impact Fee, Trails Impact Fee, and Community and Recreation Facilities Fee requirements, the proposed Project would be required to pay all applicable park and recreational impact fees prior to issuance of building permits. These fees are intended to fund the acquisition, development, and expansion of park and recreational facilities needed to serve population growth associated with new residential development within the City. Compliance with these requirements would be enforced through the City’s development review and permitting process as conditions of Project approval, thereby ensuring the proposed Project provides its fair share toward park and recreational amenities necessary to accommodate future residents.
The Project proposes on-site private and common open space and recreational amenities that would serve future residents, thereby reducing reliance on off -site public facilities. Given the proposed Project’s consistency with planned growth, required compliance with the City’s parkland dedication requirements, and inclusion of on-site recreational features, the proposed Project is not expected to result in the physical deterioration of existing recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of ne w recreational facilities that could cause significant environmental impacts. Based on the previous analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no additional review is required.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed in the GP EIR on pages 5.0 -43 through 5.0 -44, impacts related to substantial physical deterioration of parks and recreational facilities would occur and/or require the construction or expansion of parks and recreational facilities would be less than cumulatively considerable. As described above, the proposed Project is consistent with the existing land use designation, and buildout of the Project site was already contemplated in the GP and regional growth forecasts. In addition, the proposed Project would be consistent with Municipal Code Section 3.16.410: Park Improvement Impact Fee requiring all 339
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 146
residential development in the City to fund park facility improvements and expansions needed to serve new growth, and would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no additional environmental review is required.
Conclusion
Regarding the issue area of recreation, the following findings can be made:
15183 Findings
1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified.
2. There are no significant effects that were not analyzed as part of the GP EIR.
3. There are no potentially significant off- site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the GP EIR.
4. The GP EIR did not include a standalone recreation section; however, the public services analysis evaluated parks and recreation service impacts using City department information, recreation and facilities guides, the existing General Plan, Municipal Code, and other relevant literature. Based on the analysis provided in this section, the Project’s consistency with the General Plan and zoning designation, and the Project’s development intensity being within the level analyzed in the GP EIR, no substantial new information has been identified that would result in a recreation impact more severe than anticipated in the GP EIR.
5. No mitigation me asures related to recreation are contained within the G P EIR. Additionally, no mitigation would be required because Project specific impacts would be less than significant.
Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) City of Rocklin Municipal Code Section 3.16.410: Park Improvement Impact Fee. As listed previously in Section 6.15, Public Services.
City of Rocklin Municipal Code Section 3.16.4 20: Trails Impact Fee. A development impact fee is established on issuance of all building permits for residential development in the city to pay for trail facility improvements. The fee study dated April 18, 2022, identifies the facilities to be funded by the fee.
City of Rocklin Municipal Code Section 3.16.4 30: Community and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee. A development impact fee is established on issuance of all building permits for residential development in the city to pay for community and recreation facility improvements. The fee study dated April 18, 2022, identifies the facilities to be funded by the fee.
GP Goals and Policies
Policy OCR-12: Provide for park and other outdoor recreational needs, both active and passive, through methods including but not limited to: collection of park user fees, dedication of parkland, or a combination of both; rehabilitation of existing park and recreation fac ilities; requiring the installation of park improvements; and requiring that financial mechanisms be created for long-term park and/or open space operation and maintenance.
Policy OCR-13: Require dedication of parkland, payment of in lieu fees for parkland, or a combination of both, as a condition of approval in the early stages of the development process, including approval of 340
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 147
rezonings, where it is necessary to insure consistency with or implementation of the goals and policies contained in this General Plan.
Policy OCR-22: Require new development to mitigate its impact on park development and maintenance.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to recreation are included in the GP EIR. 341
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 148
6.17. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:
Project
Impact
that is
Peculiar to
the
Project or
the
Project
Site
Significant
Impact not
Analyzed
as
Significant
in the
Prior EIR
Potentially
Significant
Off-site or
Cumulative
Impact not
Discussed
in the prior
EIR
Adverse
Impact
More
Severe
based on
Substantial
New
Information
No New
Impact
Not
Previously
Analyzed
in the
Prior EIR
a) Conflict with a program,
plan, ordinance, or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
b) Would the project conflict
or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the GP EIR
the General Plan EIR analyzed the anticipated impacts on transportation that would occur as a result of the future urban development that was contemplated by the General Plan. These impacts included signalized intersections in Rocklin, Loomis, Roseville, Lincoln and Placer County, state/interstate highway segments and intersections, transit service, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and conflicts with at -grade railways (City of Rocklin General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2011, pages 4.4-1 through 4.4-98).
Mitigation measures to address these impacts are incorporated into the General Plan in the Circulation Element, and include policies that require the monitoring of traffic on City streets to determine improvements needed to maintain an acceptable level of service, updating the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and traffic impact fees, providing for inflationary adjustments to the City's traffic impact fees, maintaining a minimum level of service (LOS) of "C" for all signalized intersections during the PM peak period on an average weekday, maintaining street design standards, and interconnecting traffic 342
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 149
signals and consideration of the use of roundabouts where financially feasible and warranted to provide flexibility in controlling traffic movements at intersections.
The General Plan EIR concluded that, despite these goals and policies, significant transportation impacts will occur as a result of development under the General Plan and further, that these impacts cannot be reduced to a less than significant level. Specifically, the General Plan EIR found that buildout of the Rocklin General Plan will result in increased traffic volumes at state/interstate highway intersections and impacts to state/interstate highway segments. Findings of fact and a statement of overriding consideration were adopted by the Rocklin City Council in regard to these impacts, which were found to be significant and unavoidable.
Project-Specific Impacts
This section is based on the following report:
• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening, prepared by EPD Solutions, Inc., April 17, 2026. Included as Appendix G.
Methodology
Trip Generation
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development based on the specific land uses planned for a given project. Trip generation rates for the proposed Project are shown in Table TRA -1, Proposed Project Trip Generation, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (12th Edition, 2025). The proposed Project is expected to generate 1,352 daily trips with 101 AM peak hour trips and 129 PM peak hour trips.
Table TRA-1: Proposed Project Trip Generation
Land Use Dwelling
Units Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Rate
223 Affordable Housing - 4.81 0.10 0.26 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.46 Project Trip Generation
223 Affordable Housing 281 1,352 29 72 101 76 53 129
Total Project Trip Generation 281 1,352 29 72 101 76 53 129 Source: Appendix G
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance , or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impacts 4.4.8 and 4.4.9 and determined that impacts would be less-than-significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.4-94 to 4.4-96).
The construction and operation phases of the proposed Project would be contained within the Project site and subsequently would not interfere with the use of sidewalks, bike lanes, or public transit. The proposed Project would be consistent with the General Plan’s goals and policies, and the proposed Project 343
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 150
is not found to result in conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs, nor is it expected to negatively affect the performance or safety of existing or planned pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities. Therefore, impacts would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR.
Transit Facilities
Public transportation services within the City are provided by the Placer County Transit Agency (PCTA).
The nearest PCTA bus stop is located at the intersection of Pacific Street and Midas Avenue, adjacent to the Project site. The existing transit service would continue to serve its ridership in the area and may also serve residents of the proposed Project. The proposed Project would not alter existing transit routes, stops, or service levels. Consistent with General Plan policies that promote coordination with transit providers and transit -supportive infrastructure, the Project would be designed to maintain access to transit services. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with adopted transit plans or programs, and impacts would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR .
Bicycle Facilities and Pedestrian Facilities
The General Plan Circulation Element includes policies requiring the development of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, including bike lanes, sidewalks, and connectivity between land uses. The proposed Project would construct frontage improvements, incl uding a bike lane, a 6 -foot-wide public sidewalk, and curb and gutter improvements, consistent with City standards. Implementation of the Project would not remove or conflict with existing or planned bicycle or pedestrian facilities and would enhance multi modal connectivity in the Project vicinity. Therefore, impacts related to bicycle and pedestrian facilities would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR.
Roadway and Intersection Facilities
Implementation of the proposed Project would develop 281 multifamily residential units on a site that is currently vacant and undeveloped. Access to the Project site would be provided via a new 26 -foot-wide driveway on Pacific Street and a new 2 6-foot-wide driveway on Midas Avenue , which would provide access to all 281 proposed residences. Vehicular traffic to and from the Project site would utilize the existing network of regional and local roadways that currently serve the Project area. Specifically, regional access to the site would be provided via Interstate 80 and State Route 65, while local access would be provided via Pacific Street and Midas Avenue. Additionally, the proposed Project would be consistent with applicable GP Circulation Element goals and policies addressing the circulation system and would not impede or conflict with achievement of city-wide goals.
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, transportation impacts are evaluated based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rather than level of service (LOS). As demonstrated in the Project’s VMT Screening Memorandum, the proposed Project would not result in VMT impacts beyond applicable thresholds or those previously evaluated in the GP EIR.
Although LOS is not a CEQA significance metric, the City of Rocklin may use LOS to determine the need for roadway or intersection improvements as part of the development review process. Any required improvements would be implemented as conditions of approv al and would occur within existing rights - of-way or previously disturbed areas.
344
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 151
The City will require that roadway improvements be implemented as conditions of approval, and the proposed Project would either construct or pay its fair-share toward such improvements, as determined through the City’s review process.
The proposed Project would include frontage and roadway improvements along Pacific Street and Midas Avenue, including construction of a right -turn lane into the proposed western driveway along Midas Avenue, installation of bicycle lane striping, installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements, demolition of approximately 303 feet of existing median along Pacific Street to accommodate center turn lane striping, and reconstruction of portions of existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the Project frontage. The proposed Project would also require utility connections and trenching within the existing public right -of-way and public utility easements along Pacific Street and Midas Avenue. These improvements would support implementation of the City of Rocklin’s 2026 –2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which serves as the City’s long -range planning tool for roadway, circulation, stormwater, and infrastructure improvements throughout the City. As described in the CIP, roadway and stormwater improvements are intended to maintain and enhance safe and efficient transportation infrastructure, improve circulation, and support multimodal transportation improvements citywide. The CIP also includes ongoing roadway safety, pedestrian, bicycle, intersection, resurfacing, and railroad crossing improvement projects within the City, including improvements along Midas Avenue and at -grade railroad crossing enhancement programs.
Impacts under this threshold were adequately addressed in the GP EIR. The proposed Project is within the scope of the GP EIR and would remain consistent with the GP EIR. As described in Section 6.11, Land Use and Planning, and Section 6.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project would not induce substantial population growth beyond that anticipated in the General Plan and is consistent with the planned land use for the Project site. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, transportation impacts are evaluated based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and as demonstrated in the Project’s VMT Screening Memorandum, the proposed Project would result in less -than-significant VMT impacts.
Therefore, impacts related to the circulation system would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met; therefore, no additional review is required.
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
No New Impact. This topic was not evaluated in the GP EIR.
Senate Bill (SB) 743 was signed by Governor Brown in 2013 and required the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to level of service (LOS) for evaluating transportation impacts. SB 743 established that the new criteria should promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses. In response, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 was adopted and applies statewide, identifying vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), provides that projects that generate VMT exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may result in a significant impact. The City of Rocklin evaluates 345
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 152
transportation impacts using VMT consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 and applicable regional guidance.
As detailed in the VMT Screening Memorandum (Appendix G), the proposed Project was evaluated using screening criteria consistent with the Placer County Transportation Study Guidelines (May 2021) and the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018).
The Project does not meet the small project screening threshold due to trip generation; however, the Project qualifies for multiple other screening criteria. Specifically, the Project proposes a 100 percent affordable multifamily residential development, w hich qualifies for the affordable housing screening criterion under both Placer County Guidelines and the OPR Technical Advisory.
In addition, the Project is located within a low VMT -generating area, as demonstrated using the SACOG VMT Evaluation Tool, and is located within one -half mile of an existing major transit stop (Rocklin Train Station). The Project also meets all additional criteria required for transit -based screening, including consistency with the regional Sustainable Communities Strategy and provision of parking consistent with applicable standards.
Because the Project satisfies multiple screening thresholds, including affordable housing, proximity to transit, and location within a low VMT -generating area, the Project may be presumed to result in a less - than-significant VMT impact. Accordingly, the Pr oject would not conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), and no further VMT analysis is required.
Because this impact was not identified in the GP EIR and the Project would not introduce conditions that would result in a new or more severe impact, the proposed Project would not result in a peculiar impact related to wildfire infrastructure pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impact 4.4.10 and was determined to have a less-than-significant impact (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.4-96 to 4.4-97).
Construction
The Project proposes development of the site in one phase lasting approximately 23.8 -months. During construction, worker vehicles, haul trucks, and vendor trucks would be staged on the portion of the Project site under construction for the duration of the construction period. As part of the grading plan and building plan review processes, City permits would require appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of persons and vehicles through/around any required road closures and measures to properly route heavy-duty construction vehicles entering and leaving the site (as applicable). As a result, impacts related to vehicular circulation design features and incompatible uses during construction of the proposed Project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR.
Operation
As previously described, vehicular access to the Project site would be provided via driveways along Midas Avenue and Pacific Street, which would provide access to the proposed residential development. Internal circulation would be accommodated through a ne twork of private drive aisles designed to meet local 346
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 153
circulation and emergency access standards, with roadway widths designed in accordance with applicable City standards.
The proposed Project would not introduce any new roadways or land uses that would conflict with existing land uses in the surrounding area. Design of the proposed Project, including internal private drive aisles , ingress and egress points, and streetscape improvements, would be subject to the City’s development standards. The proposed Project has also been designed to ensure fire apparatus access and turnaround areas consistent with California Fire Code standards . On -site traffic signing and striping would be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans. Project frontage improvements and site access points would be constructed consistent with roadway classifications and applicable cross-sections identified in the City of Rocklin General Plan Circulation Element. Compliance with these requirements would be ensured through the City’s permitting process.
With respect to potential at-grade railway conflicts, the Project would not introduce design features that would increase hazards at existing crossings. As identified in the GP EIR, compliance with General Plan Policy C-33, which seeks safety and circulation improvements to railroad crossings and encourages grade separation where feasible, would ensure that proposed Project would not result in new or more severe impacts beyond those identified in the GP EIR.
As such, impacts related to hazards due to design features or incompatible uses would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met; therefore, no additional review is required. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No New Impact. This topic was not evaluated in the GP EIR.
Construction
As described above, t he proposed construction activities, including equipment and supply staging and storage, would occur within the Project site and would not restrict access of emergency vehicles to the Project site or adjacent areas. The installation of driveways and connections to existing infrastructure systems that would be implemented during construction of the proposed Project could require the temporary closure of one side or portions of Pacific Street and Midas Avenue for a short period of time.
However, Project construction activities would be required to ensure emergency access in accordance with Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9), which would be ensured through the City’s permitting process and City of Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 15.04.050, Fire Code. The City as well as Rocklin Fire Department would review the development plans as part of the permitting procedures to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements . Thus, implementation of the proposed Project through the City’s permitting process would ensure existing regulations are adhered to and would address any potential construction related emergency access impacts. Therefore, impacts related to inadequate emergency access during construction activities would not occur and no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. 347
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 154
Operation
As described previously, the proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access to the site via a new 26-foot-wide driveway on Pacific Street and new 26-foot-wide driveway on Midas Avenue. Internal circulation would be accommodated through a network of private drive aisles, designed to support two - way vehicle travel and provide adequate access for emergency response vehicles in accordance with applicable City and fire department standards.
The City as well as Rocklin Fire Department would review the development plans as part of the permitting procedures to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code . Since the proposed Project is required to comply with all applicable C ity codes, as verified by the City during the review process, potential impacts related to inadequate emergency access would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no additional review is required.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed in the GP EIR on pages 5.0 -9 through 5.0 -26, implementation of the General Plan would contribute to cumulative transportation impacts associated with increased development and corresponding increases in vehicle trips . The General Plan EIR evaluated cumulative transportation conditions based on anticipated growth within the City and the region and identified improvements and policies intended to reduce transportation -related impacts, including multimodal transportation strategies, roadway improvements, and measures to encourage alternative transportation modes. The proposed project is consistent with the development assumptions analyzed in the General Plan EIR and would not result in new or substantially more severe trans portation impacts than those identified in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative transportation impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, and no further analysis of cumulative transportation impacts is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
Conclusion
Regarding the issue area of transportation and traffic, the following findings can be made:
15183 Findings
1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified.
2. There are no significant effects that were not analyzed as part of the GP EIR.
3. There are no potentially significant off- site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the GP EIR.
4. The GP EIR transportation and circulation analysis used existing transportation system and LOS data, buildout assumptions, and travel demand modeling to project future traffic volumes with and without General Plan implementation. Based on the analysis provided in this section, the Project’s consistency with the General Plan and zoning designation, the Project’s development intensity being within the level analyzed in the GP EIR, and the findings of the project -specific VMT Screening, no substantial new information has been identified that would result in a new or substantially greater transportation impact.
348
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 155
5. No mitigation measu res related to recreation are contained within the GP EIR. Additionally, no mitigation would be required because Project specific impacts would be less than significant.
Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) City of Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 15.04.050: Fire Code. As listed previously in Section 6.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
GP Goals and Policies
Policy C-33: Seek safety and circulation improvements to existing railroad crossings and construction of new grade separated crossings or undercrossings where appropriate and feasible.
Policy C-56: Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety through such methods as signage, lighting, traffic controls, and crosswalks.
Policy C -59: Promote pedestrian convenience and recreational opportunities through development conditions requiring sidewalks, walking paths, or hiking trails connecting various land uses including residential areas, commercial areas, schools, parks, employment centers and open space.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to transportation are included in the GP EIR. 349
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 156
6.18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in
Public Resources Code
Section 21074 as either a site,
feature, place, cultural
landscape that is
geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of
the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value
to a California Native
American tribe, and that is:
Project
Impact
that is
Peculiar to
the Project
or the
Project
Site
Significant
Impact not
Analyzed
as
Significant
in the
Prior EIR
Potentially
Significant
Off-site or
Cumulative
Impact not
Discussed
in the prior
EIR
Adverse
Impact
More
Severe
based on
Substantial
New
Information
No New
Impact
Not
Previously
Analyzed
in the
Prior EIR
a) Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in a
local register of historical
resources as defined in Public
Resources Code Section
5020.1(k)?
b) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in
subdivision I of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision I of Public
Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of
the resource to a California
Native American tribe?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the GP EIR
The General Plan EIR analyzed the anticipated impacts that would occur to historical, cultural and paleontological resources within the Planning area as a result of the future urban development that was contemplated by the General Plan. These impacts includ ed potential destruction or damage to any historical, cultural, and paleontological resources (City of Rocklin General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2011, pages 4.8 -1 through 4.8 -21). Mitigation measures to address these impacts are incorporated into the General Plan in the Land Use and Open Space, Recreation and Conservation Elements, and include goals 350
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 157
and policies that encourage the preservation and protection of historical, cultural and paleontological resources and the proper treatment and handling of such resources when they are discovered.
The General Plan EIR concluded that despite these goals and policies, significant cultural resources impacts will occur as a result of development under the General Plan and further, that these impacts cannot be reduced to a less than significant level. Specifically, the General Plan EIR found that buildout of the Rocklin General Plan will contribute to cumulative impacts to historic character. Findings of fact and a statement of overriding considerations were adopted by the Rocklin City Council in regard to these impacts, which were found to be significant and unavoidable.
Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) were not required to be evaluated separately from Cultural Resources by CEQA Guidelines at the time of the preparation of the GP EIR.
Project-Specific Impacts
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision I of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision I of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
No New Impact.
While impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources were not discussed within the GP EIR, as discussed on page
4.8-9., a sacred lands search was conducted and a list of Native American contacts from the Native American Heritage Commission ( NAHC) was obtained . The results of the sacred lands search were received on October 16, 2008, and did not identify any Native American sacred lands within the General Plan Update Planning Area. Tribal cultural resources (TCRs) are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074.
The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped, and no known tribal cultural resources have been identified on-site.
Assembly Bill (AB) 52 establishes a formal consultation process for projects requiring the preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report. As the proposed Project is being evaluated pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 which supports an exemption, and no additional CEQA document is required, formal AB 52 consultation is not applicable to the proposed 351
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 158
Project. Similarly, Senate Bill (SB) 18 consultation requirements apply to the adoption or amendment of general plans or specific plans and are not applicable to the proposed Project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met; therefore, no additional review is required.
Cumulative Impacts
While impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources were not discussed within the GP EIR, as discussed on page
4.8-9., a sacred lands search was conducted and a list of Native American contacts was obtained from the Native American Heritage Commission ( NAHC). The results of the sacred lands search were received on October 16, 2008, and did not identify any Native American sacred lands within the General Plan Update Planning Area. All tribal representation groups on the list provided by the NAHC were contacted, through written correspondence. While TCRs are not necessarily the same as what are considered to be more typical cultural resources, the proposed Project would implement Mitigation Measure CUL-1, which would reduce impacts to any inadvertently discovered cultural resources on the site. Therefore, the proposed project’s contribution to cumulative cultural resource impacts would not be cumulatively considerable, and no further analysis of cumulative transportation impacts is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
Conclusion
Regarding the issue area of tribal cultural resources, the following findings can be made:
15183 Findings
1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified.
2. There are no significant effects that were not analyzed as part of the GP EIR.
3. There are no potentially significant off- site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the GP EIR.
4. The GP EIR did not include a standalone tribal cultural resources section; however, the cultural resources analysis included an NAHC Sacred Lands File search and Native American contact outreach, which identified no sacred lands within the Planning Area. Based on the analysis provided in this section, the Project’s consistency with the General Plan and zoning designation, the Project’s site- specific conditions, and implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, no substantial information has been identified that would result in a significant tribal cultural resources impact.
5. No new mitigation measures would be required. Project specific impacts would be less than significant with adherence to the City’s standard mitigation measure, as listed below.
Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) None.
352
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 159
GP Goals and Policies
OCR-62: Preserve historically significant resources in place if feasible, or provide mitigation (avoidance, excavation, documentation, curation, data recovery, or other appropriate measures) prior to further disturbance.
OCR-65: Preserve significant archaeological resources (including Native American remains) and paleontological resources in place if feasible, or provide mitigation (avoidance, excavation, documentation, curation, data recovery, or other appropriate measures) prior to further disturbance.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to tribal cultural resources are included in the GP EIR.
Project Specific Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Unanticipated Resources. As mentioned in Section 6.5 Cultural Resources. 353
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 160
6.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
Project
Impact that
is Peculiar
to the
Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact not
Analyzed
as
Significant
in the
Prior EIR
Potentially
Significant
Off-site or
Cumulative
Impact not
Discussed
in the prior
EIR
Adverse
Impact
More
Severe
based on
Substantial
New
Information
No New
Impact
Not
Previously
Analyzed
in the
Prior EIR
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction of
new or expanded water or
wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the
construction of which could
cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water
supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during normal,
dry, and multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination
by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected
demand in addition to the
provider’s existing
commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards or in excess of the
capacity of local
infrastructure or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, State,
and local management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?
354
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 161
Summary of Impacts Identified in the GP EIR
The General Plan EIR analyzed the anticipated impacts on utilities and service systems that would occur as a result of the future urban development that was contemplated by the General Plan. These impacts included increased generation of wastewater flow, prov ision of adequate wastewater treatment, increased demand for solid waste disposal, and increased demand for energy and communication services (City of Rocklin General Plan Update Draft EIR, 2011, pages 4.13 -1 through 4.13-34). The analysis found that while development and buildout of the General Plan can result in utilities and service system impacts, these impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level through the application of General Plan goals and policies that would assist in minimizing or avoiding impacts to utilities and service systems.
In addition, impacts related to the expansion or relocation of water facilities and the capacity of water supplies to serve the future development were discussed within Chapter 4.14 of the GP EIR. The GP EIR found that the proposed Rocklin General Plan Update’s mitigating policies and their associated action steps as well as PCWA’s efforts to provide adequate and reliable water supply for buildout of its planning area, ensure the impact would be less than significant.
These goals and policies include, but are not limited to, requiring studies of infrastructure needs, proportional share participation in the financial costs of public services and facilities, coordination of private development projects with public facilit ies and services needed to serve the project and encouraging energy conservation in new developments.
Project-Specific Impacts
a) Require or result in the construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impacts 4.13.1.1, 4.13.1.2, and 4.13.3.1 and was determined to be less than significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.13 -10 to 4.13-15 and 4.13-28 to
4.13-30).
Water
As described in the General Plan EIR, the Project site is located within the service area of the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA), which provides potable water service to the City of Rocklin. PCWA supplies treated water to the Planning Area through an existing system of transmission mains, distribution pipelines, and storage facilities that were evaluated in the General Plan EIR.
Potable water service for the proposed Project would be provided via the installation of an on-site six- inch water line, which would connect to existing 12- inch public water lines located in Pacific Street. The new on-site water system would convey water supplies to the proposed building and landscaping through plumbing/landscaping fixtures that are compliant with the CALGreen Code for efficient use of water and that are consistent with GP goals and policies. Installation of the new water distribution lines would only serve the proposed Project and would not provide new water supplies to any off -site areas. The construction activities related to the on -site water infrastructure that would be needed to serve the proposed Project are included as part of the proposed Project and would not result in any physical environmental effects beyond those identified throughout this document. 355
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 162
Furthermore, as described in Section 6.11, Land Use and Planning, and Section 6.14, Population and Housing, the proposed Project is consistent with land uses anticipated for the area by the GP and would not induce substantial unplanned population. Thus, it is not anticipated that implementation of the proposed Project would require construction of new or expanded water facilities and no additional water supplies would be needed to accommodate the proposed P roject beyond what is anticipated by PCWA.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects, and impacts would be less than significant.
Wastewater
As described in the General Plan EIR, the Project site is located within the service area of the South Placer Municipal Utility District (SPMUD), which provides wastewater collection and conveyance, with treatment provided at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants operated by the South Placer Wastewater Authority (SPWA).
The General Plan EIR concluded that implementation of planned growth would increase wastewater flows; however, these increases would be accommodated within planned infrastructure improvements and expansions identified in the South Placer Regional Wastewate r and Recycled Water Systems Evaluation. Planned buildout conditions would not exceed available or planned treatment capacity, and no unanticipated expansion of facilities would be required.
Additionally, the General Plan EIR determined that most wastewater conveyance infrastructure required to serve development is already in place or planned, and any necessary improvements would be implemented by future development and subject to project -level CEQA review. The proposed Project is consistent with the land use assumptions evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not result in wastewater flows or infrastructure demands beyond those previously analyzed. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts related to wastewater treatment or conveyance would occur.
Development of the proposed Project would include installation of on -site sewer infrastructure connecting to existing SPMUD facilities. Specifically, the Project would connect to an existing 8 -inch sanitary sewer line within Pacific Street and would install approximately 8-inch private sewer lines within the Project site, with smaller lateral connections serving individual buildings. These improvements are typical of urban development and would occur within previously disturbed areas or within the Project footprint.
Construction activities associated with installation of on-site sewer infrastructure (e.g., trenching and pipe installation) are accounted for as part of the Project’s overall construction impacts and would not result in new or substantially more severe physical environmental effects beyond those identified elsewhere in this document. Because the proposed Project includes all necessary on-site wastewater infrastructure to serve the development and would connect to existing SPMUD facilities, it would not req uire the construction of new off -site wastewater treatment or conveyance facilities beyond those previously planned and analyzed in the General Plan EIR.
As described above, the proposed Project is consistent with the land use and growth assumptions of the General Plan and would not induce substantial unplanned population growth. Therefore, implementation 356
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 163
of the proposed Project is not anticipated to require the construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities beyond those already planned by SPMUD.
Accordingly, the proposed Project would not require or result in the expansion of wastewater treatment facilities or conveyance infrastructure beyond what was previously evaluated in the General Plan EIR, and impacts would remain less than significant.
Stormwater
As evaluated in the General Plan EIR, future development within the Planning Area would incorporate stormwater infrastructure and comply with applicable regulatory requirements, and associated impacts were determined to be less than significant.
The proposed Project would be required to implement on -site drainage controls consistent with applicable standards. Because the Project is consistent with the development assumptions evaluated in the General Plan EIR, it would not require new or expanded o ff-site stormwater facilities beyond those previously analyzed. Therefore, no new or more severe impacts would occur.
Electric Power and Telecommunications
The General Plan EIR evaluated increased demand for electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services associated with buildout of the Planning Area and concluded that impacts would be less than significant.
The General Plan EIR determined that utility providers, including Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and telecommunications providers, would accommodate increased demand through planned infrastructure extensions and upgrades implemented on an as -needed basis co nsistent with approved land use development. Such improvements are anticipated to occur primarily within existing rights -of-way or previously disturbed areas and were accounted for in the program-level analysis.
The General Plan EIR further concluded that compliance with Title 24 energy efficiency standards and implementation of General Plan policies (including requirements for undergrounding utilities, coordinating infrastructure installation, and minimizing road way trenching) would reduce potential environmental impacts associated with utility infrastructure.
The proposed Project is consistent with the land use designations and growth assumptions evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not result in utility demand beyond what was previously analyzed.
Therefore, the Project would not require new or expanded off- site electrical, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities beyond those already anticipated, and no new or substantially more severe impacts would occur.
Natural Gas
The proposed Project would not incorporate the use of natural gas. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in no new impacts related to construction of new or expanded utilities that could result in significant environmental effects.
Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed 357
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 164
in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no subsequent review is required. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impacts 4.1 4.1, 4.14.2, and 4.13.3.1 and was determined to be less than significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.14-16 to 4.13-24).
The Project site is located within the service area of the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA), which provides potable water service to the City of Rocklin. PCWA maintains a Water System Master Plan that is periodically updated to address existing and projec ted water demands within its service area and includes provisions for infrastructure expansion as necessary. PCWA also collects connection and capacity fees to fund maintenance and expansion of water supply and conveyance facilities.
PCWA’s service area is divided into five zones, and the Project site is located within Zone 1, which provides water service to Auburn, Bowman, Ophir, Newcastle, Penryn, Loomis, Rocklin, Lincoln, and portions of Granite Bay. PCWA has planned for growth in t he City of Rocklin and has sized the water supply infrastructure to meet this growth and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry year conditions (PCWA 2022).
The Project site would be served by the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (WTP), which treats water diverted from the American River Pump Station near Auburn, and the proposed Project’s estimated maximum daily water treatment demand would not exceed the plant’s permitted capacity. Because the proposed Project would be served by a water treatment plant that has adequate capacity to meet the Project’s projected demand and would not require the construction of a new water treatment plant, the Project’s water supply and treatment facility impacts would be considered less than significant.
The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation and would not result in water demand beyond what has been accounted for in PCWA planning documents. In addition, the Project would incorporate water- efficient fixtures and landsc aping in compliance with Title 24 and the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), which would reduce overall potable water demand.
Therefore, sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the proposed Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and impacts would be less than significant. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no additional environmental review is required. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the G P EIR as Impacts 4.13.1.1 and 4.13.1.2 and was determined to have a less-than-significant impact (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.13-10 to 4.13-15).
As described in the General Plan EIR, the Project site is located within the service area of the South Placer Municipal Utility District (SPMUD), which provides wastewater collection and conveyance, with treatment provided at the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plants operated by the South Placer Wastewater Authority (SPWA).
358
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 165
The General Plan EIR concluded that sufficient wastewater treatment capacity exists and/or is planned to accommodate buildout within the Planning Area. Specifically, regional wastewater treatment facilities are operating below permitted capacities and have planned expansions to accommodate future growth, and wastewater flows associated with development consistent with the General Plan would not exceed the capacity of these facilities.
The proposed Project is consistent with the land use assumptions and development intensity evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not generate wastewater flows beyond those previously analyzed. As such, the Project’s demand has been accounted for within the existing and planned treatment capacity of SPMUD/SPWA facilities.
Therefore, the wastewater treatment provider would have adequate capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand in addition to existing commitments, and the Project would not require new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities beyond those previously evaluated in the General Plan EIR.
Accordingly, no new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the General Plan EIR.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further environmental review are not met.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impact 4.13.2.1 and was determined to be less than significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.13-20 to 4.13-21).
As described in the General Plan EIR, solid waste generated within the City of Rocklin is collected by a franchised hauler (Recology Auburn Placer) and transported to facilities operated by the Western Placer Waste Management Authority (WPWMA), including the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill.
The General Plan EIR concluded that implementation of planned growth would increase solid waste generation; however, sufficient landfill and processing capacity exists within the WPWMA system to accommodate buildout of the Planning Area. Specifically, waste generated at buildout would not exceed the landfill’s permitted capacity of 1,900 tons per day or the MRF’s processing capacity of approximately 2,200 tons per day.
The proposed Project would generate solid waste during construction activities as well as during operation. Construction -related waste would consist primarily of packaging and discarded materials, while operational waste would consist of typical residential refuse. All solid waste generated by the Project would be collected, recycled, and disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations.
The proposed Project is consistent with the land use assumptions and development intensity evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not generate solid waste in excess of what was previously analyzed.
Implementation of General Plan Policies PF-29, which include provisions of solid waste collection services to maintain public health standards, would ensure continued adequate solid waste collection and disposal capacity.
359
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 166
Accordingly, the proposed Project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, would not exceed the capacity of local infrastructure, and would not impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.
No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further environmental review are not met. e) Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the GP EIR as Impact 4.13.2.1 and was determined to be less than significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.13-16 to 4.13-22).
As described previously, the proposed Project would generate solid waste during construction and operation. All solid waste-generating activities associated with the Project would be subject to applicable federal regulations administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, State requirements under the California Integrated Waste Management Act, and local regulations governing solid waste handling, storage, and disposal.
Construction activities would be required to comply with Section 5.408.1 of the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), which requires recycling or reuse of a minimum of 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste. Operational solid waste would be subject to State diversion requirements, including AB 341 and related regulations, which require recycling and diversion of solid waste from landfills.
In addition, the City of Rocklin Municipal Code 13.08, Solid Waste and Construction Refuse Collection, requires the provision of adequate on -site solid waste and recycling receptacles and regular collection services to ensure proper handling of refuse and maintenance of public health standards. Compliance with these requirements would be verified through the City’s development review and permitting process.
The proposed Project does not include any unusual land uses or operational characteristics that would impair compliance with applicable solid waste statutes and regulations. Implementation of the Project would occur in accordance with all applicable requirements related to solid waste diversion, recycling, and disposal during both construction and operation.
Therefore, the proposed Project would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste, and n o new or substantially more severe impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the General Plan EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requirin g further environmental review are not met.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed in the GP EIR on pages 4.13 -14 through 4.13 -15, 4.13 -22, and 4.14- 23 through 4.14-24, implementation of the General Plan would increase the demand for public utility infrastructure that could result in the need for new systems or a substantial expansion or alteration to the local or regional facilities that would result in a physical impact to the environment. However, the proposed Rocklin General Plan Update’s mitigating policies and their associated action steps would ensure that new development under the proposed project would not proceed without verification and determination that adequate water 360
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 167
supply infrastructure exists to serve the development. The proposed Project would be consistent with the development assumptions analyzed in the General Plan EIR and would not result in utility demands beyond those anticipated under the General Plan. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with applicable General Plan policies, Municipal Code requirements, and utility provider standards related to infrastructure improvements, water conservation, wastewater management, stormwater control, solid waste reducti on, and energy efficiency. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in new or substantially more severe cumulative impacts related to utilities and service systems beyond those identified in the General Plan EIR, and impacts would not be cumulatively considerable pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
Conclusion
Regarding the issue area of utilities and service systems, the following findings can be made:
15183 Findings
1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified.
2. There are no significant effects that were not analyzed as part of the GP EIR.
3. There are no potentially significant off- site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the GP EIR.
4. The GP EIR utilities and service systems analysis used service provider information, agency planning documents, technical reports, and consultation with applicable wastewater, solid waste, and water service providers. Based on the analysis provided in this section, the Project’s consistency with the General Plan and zoning designation, and the Project’s development intensity being within the level analyzed in the GP EIR, no substantial new information has been identified that would result in a utilities and service systems impact more severe than anticipated in the GP EIR.
5. No mitigation meas ures related to utilities and service systems are contained within the GP EIR.
Additionally, no mitigation measures would be required because Project specific impacts would be less than significant.
Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen). Section 5.408.1.1 Construction waste management plan. Newly constructed projects and additions and alterations to existing buildings shall recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris in accordance with Section 5.408.1.1.
City of Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 13.08: Solid Waste and Construction Refuse Collection. Requires adequate on -site solid waste and recycling facilities and regular collection services to ensure proper handling and disposal of refuse.
GP Goals and Policies
Policy PF -3: Require that any development that generates the need for public services and facilities, including equipment, pay its proportional share of providing those services and facilities. Participation may include, but is not limited to, the formation of assessme nt districts, special taxes, payment of fees, payment of the City’s Construction Tax, purchase of equipment, and/or the construction and dedication of facilities.
361
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 168
Policy PF -5: Require that construction of private development projects be coordinated with the construction of public facilities and services that are needed to serve the project.
Policy PF-29: Require solid waste collection services to ensure the maintenance of health standards.
Policy OCR-56: Encourage energy conservation in new developments.
Policy OCR-57: Encourage urban design and form that conserves land and other resources.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to utilities and service systems are included in the GP EIR.
362
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 169
6.20. WILDFIRE
If located in or near State
responsibility areas or lands
classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would
the project:
Project
Impact that
is Peculiar
to the
Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact
not
Analyzed
as
Significant
in the
Prior EIR
Potentially
Significant
Off-site or
Cumulative
Impact not
Discussed in
the prior
EIR
Adverse
Impact
More
Severe
based on
Substantial
New
Information
No
New
Impact
Not
Previously
Analyzed
in the
Prior EIR
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and
thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled
spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads,
fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in
temporary or ongoing
impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or
structures to significant risks,
including downslope or
downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post -fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
Summary of Impacts Identified in the GP EIR
The GP EIR evaluated hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with buildout of the General Plan and determined that impacts related to emergency response and evacuation, hazardous materials use, airport hazards, and wildfire exposure would be les s than significant with compliance with existing regulations and General Plan policies.
363
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 170
With respect to emergency response and evacuation, the GP EIR concluded that development under the General Plan would not substantially impair emergency access or evacuation plans, as future projects would be required to comply with the City’s Emergency Operations Plan, roadway design standards, and applicable fire and building codes.
The GP EIR also determined that wildfire risk within the Planning Area is primarily associated with areas located within or adjacent to wildland -urban interface areas, including portions of the City identified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHS Z). However, implementation of applicable regulations, including the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and General Plan policies, would reduce wildfire-related risks to a less-than-significant level.
Project-Specific Impacts
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No New Impact. This topic was evaluated in the G P EIR as Impact 4.7.4 and was determined to be less than significant (City of Rocklin, 2011, pp. 4.7-25 through 4.7-27).
California Government Code Chapter 6.8 directs the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to identify areas of very high fire hazard severity within Local Responsibility Areas (LRA).
Mapping of the areas, referred to as VHFHSZ, is based on data and models of potential fuels over a 30- to 50-year time horizon and their associated expected fire behavior and expected burn probabilities, which quantifies the likelihood and nature of vegetation fire exposure to buildings. LRA VHFHSZ maps were initially developed in the mid -1990s and are now being updated based on improved science, mapping techniques, and data. In 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted California Building Code Chapter 7A requiring new buildings in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones to use ignition-resistant construction methods and materials.
According to the Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps recommended by CAL FIRE on December 16, 2025, the Project site is not located within a SRA or within an area identified as a V HFHSZ (CAL FIRE, 2026) . The Project site is, however, listed within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA), meaning the primary responsibility for preventing and suppressing wildfires is with the local agency. Additionally, as stated in S ection 6.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the proposed Project would not physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed Project does not include any characteristics (e.g., permanent road closures or long -term blocking of road access) that would substantially impair or otherwise conflict with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
Should the proposed Project require temporary impairment of an evacuation route due to road closures, the City of Rocklin would require issuance of an encroachment permit approved by the Public Works Director, pursuant to Section 12.04.30 of the Rocklin Municipal Code, to assure safety of the public.
The proposed Project would provide adequate emergency access to the site via a new 26 -foot-wide driveway on Pacific Street and a new 26-foot-wide driveway on Midas Avenue. The proposed Project would include the construction of private parking lot designed to meet local circulation, safety, and access standards. The internal parking layout would include 26-foot wide roadway widths to accommodate emergency vehicle access . Project driveways and internal access would be consistent with the City’s permitting procedures, to ensure adequate emergency access and evacuation. 364
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 171
The City of Rocklin and Rocklin Fire Department would review the development plans as part of the permitting procedures to ensure adequate emergency access pursuant to the requirements in Section 503 of the California Fire Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations, Part 9). As a result, the proposed Project would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project beyond what was previously evaluated, identified, and disclosed in the GP EIR. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no subsequent review is required. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollution concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
No New Impact. This topic was not evaluated in the GP EIR.
As described in the previous response, the Project site is not located within or near an SRA or a VHFHSZ.
The site is currently vacant and undeveloped, with no existing structures. It is primarily characterized by non-native, ruderal grasses. As such. development of the site with the proposed uses would reduce the amount of exposed vegetation available as fuel. The Project site is also surrounded by retail commercial and light industrial uses and Union Pacific Railroad tracks to the north; retail and service commercial uses to the south; commercial uses to the east; and railroad tracks and existing residential uses to the west .
Overall, adjacent areas are predominantly developed and do not contain factors that could exacerbate wildfire risks. Therefore, the proposed Project and existing site conditions would not contribute to an increase in exposure to wildfire hazards.
The proposed Project would be required to comply with the 2022 California Fire Code, 2022 California Building Code, and City of Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 15.04.050, Fire Code. The City of Rocklin Fire Code provides building standards for access roads, building clearances and other fire -related requirements such as fire apparatus, construction materials and methods, and automatic sprinkler systems. Compliance with these requirements would be verified by the City of Rocklin and Rocklin Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits for the proposed Project. As such, the proposed Project would not exacerbate wildfire risks as compared to existing conditions because it is representative of existing development in the area. Because this impact was not identified in the GP EIR and the Project would not introduce conditions that would result in a new or more severe impact, the proposed project would not result in a peculiar impact related to the exacerbation of wildfire risks that would expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire pursuant to Section 15183. Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no subsequent review is required. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No New Impact. This topic was not evaluated in the GP EIR. 365
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 172
As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not located within or near an SRA or a VHFHSZ and is located within a predominantly developed setting. The Project site is located within an urbanized area that is not identified as a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CAL FIRE, 2026). Accordingly, the Project site is not subject to wildfire-related hazards typically associated with undeveloped or wildland interface areas.
The proposed Project does not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (including roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that would exacerbate fire risk or that would result in impacts to the environmen t. Although the proposed Project includes proposed roadway improvements and new driveways within the Project site, the proposed Project does not include any changes to public or private roadways that would exacerbate fire risk or that would result in impacts to the environment. Although utility improvements, including domestic water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain lines proposed as part of the proposed Project would be extended throughout the Project site, these utility improvements would be underground and would not exacerbate fire risk. Furthermore, the proposed Project represents infill development within an existing urbanized area and would not introduce new infrastructure into previously undeveloped or wildfire-prone areas. As such, the Project would not create or exacerbate wildfire risk conditions beyond those typical of urban residential development.
Project design and implementation of utility improvements would be reviewed and approved by the City as part of the Project approval process to ensure the proposed Project is compliant with all applicable design standards and regulations. Because this impact was not identified in the GP EIR and the Project would not introduce conditions that would result in a new or more severe impact, the proposed Project would not result in a peculiar impact related to wildfire infrastructure pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. Therefore, the proposed Project would not include infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities), that would exacerbate fire risk or that would result in impacts to the environment . Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no subsequent review is required.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No New Impact. This topic was not evaluated in the GP EIR.
As described in the previous responses, the Project site is not within or near an SRA or VHFHSZ. The Project site is located within an urbanized area that is not identified as a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CAL FIRE, 2026). As discussed in Section 6.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed Project would not result in increased impacts related to flooding or drainage changes. Also as discussed in Section
6.7, Geology and Soils, the Project site is relatively flat and is not susceptible to landslides. In addition, the Project site is located in a flat area that does not contain or is adjacent to large slopes, and the proposed Project would not generate large slopes.
Construction activities related to the proposed Project would be subject to compliance with the CBC and would include BMPs. BMPs may include but are not limited to covering of the soil, use of a dust-inhibiting material, landscaping, use of straw and jute, hydroseeding, and grading in a pattern that slows stormwater 366
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 173
flow and reduces the potential for erosion, landslides, and downstream flooding. The site would include a combination of on -site storm drain infrastructure and a biofiltration basin designed to comply with applicable City of Rocklin stormwater management and Water Quality Management Plan requirements.
Because this impact was not identified in the GP EIR and the Project would not introduce conditions that would result in a new or more severe impact, the proposed project would not result in a peculiar impact related to the exposure of people or structures to significant risks pursuant to Section 15183. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in impacts related to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes.
Based on the foregoing analysis, no new or substantially greater impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed Projec t. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met, therefore no subsequent review is required.
Cumulative Impacts
While wildfire was not included as a chapter within the GP EIR, the GP EIR evalu ated hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with buildout of the General Plan and determined that impacts related to emergency response and evacuation, hazardous materials use, airport hazards, and wildfire exposure would be less than significa nt with compliance with existing regulations and General Plan policies. The Project site is located within an urbanized area of the City of Rocklin and is not located within or near an SRA or a VHFHSZ. The P roject would be required to comply with applicable fire protection regulations, including the California Fire Code, California Building Code, and City of Rocklin fire safety standards, which address requirements related to emergency access, fire suppressio n systems, and building design features intended to minimize wildfire risks. In addition, the P roject would not result in substantial impacts associated with wildland fire risk, such as locating new structures in high fire hazard areas, impairing emergency response access, or increasing risks associated with evacuation. Therefore, the proposed P roject would not result in a new significant wildfire impact or substantially more severe wildfire impact than previously identified in the General Plan EIR, and cumulative wildfire impacts would be less than significant pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
Conclusion
Regarding the issue area of wildfire, the following findings can be made:
15183 Findings
1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified.
2. There are no significant effects that were not analyzed as part of the GP EIR.
3. There are no potentially significant off- site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by the GP EIR.
4. The GP EIR did not include a standalone wildfire section; however, the hazards analysis evaluated emergency response, evacuation, and wildfire exposure impacts associated with General Plan buildout. Based on the analysis provided in this section, the Proje ct’s consistency with the General Plan and zoning designation, the Project’s site -specific conditions, and required compliance with applicable fire safety regulations, no substantial information has been identified that would result in a significant wildfire impact.
367
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 174
5. No new mitigation measures would be required. Project specific impacts would be less than significant with adherence to GP EIR mitigation measures, as listed below.
Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter 15.04.050: Fire Code. As listed previously in Section 6.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
GP Goals and Policies
Policy S- 2: Emergency Operations Plan. Maintain a City Emergency Operations Plan, to include the National Incident Management System (N.I.M.S.).
Policy S- 5: Roadway Standards . Maintain appropriate standards for minimum road widths and turnarounds.
Policy S-18: Fuel Modification. Incorporate fuel modification/fire hazard reduction planning (e.g., weed abatement, open space management plans, firebreaks, planting restrictions) on lands (both public and private) that contain terrain and vegetative features such as grass, woodlands and severe slopes.
GP EIR Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures related to wildfire are included in the GP EIR.
368
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 175
7. DOCUMENT PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
Lead Agency:
City of Rocklin Community Development Department
3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
CEQA Document Preparer:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
Konnie Dobreva, Vice President of Environmental Planning Brady Connolly, Assistant Planner
Alexis Brito, Assistant Planner
Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis and Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
Elaina Chambers
Alex Garber
Tina Yuan
General Biological Assessment:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
Shawn Gatchel Hernandez
Cruz Hernandez
Geotechnical Engineering Study Update:
Youngdahl Consulting Group, Inc.
Mahdi Sultani
Brandon K. Shimizu
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment:
Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Jennifer Alvarado
Alicia Jansen
Joshua Sargent
Kyle Emerson
Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis:
EPD Solutions, Inc.
Jordan Mower
Simon Lin
Alex Garber
369
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Consistency Analysis and Checklist City of Rocklin 176
8. REFERENCES
CAL FIRE. (2026). California Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Retrieved from https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire- hazard-severity-zones
California Department of Conservation. (2025). California Important Farmland Finder. Retrieved from https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/
California Department of Conservation. (2026). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Retrieved from https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/informationwarehouse/eqzapp/ California Department of Finance. (2025, January). E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 2021-2025, with 2020 Benchmark. Retrieved from https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-5-population-and-housing-estimates- for-cities-counties-and-the-state-2020-2025/
California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit. (2022, December). CaCensus. Retrieved from
https://cacensus.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=67f7e4aa0bc6450e8a05 2176a12d86b9
California Department of Transportation. (2025). Caltrans State Scenic Highway System Map. Retrieved from
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/47e2009986264718a5a13a2c81382774#data_s=id%3 AdataSource_2-199ba60323a-layer-3%3A171
City of Rocklin. (2011). City of Rocklin Proposed General Plan Draft EIR. Retrieved from https://www.rocklin.ca.us/post/draft-general-plan-update-environmental-impact-report-0 Executive Department State of California. (2005). Executive Order S-3-05. Retrieved from https://www.library.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/GovernmentPublications/executive-order- proclamation/5129-5130.pdf
Placer County. (2024, December). Placer County General Plan Demographics Trends. Retrieved from chrome-
extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/Vi ew/85000/9_DemographicTrendsReport_123024
370
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 1
July 2026
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead or public agency that approves or carries out a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified, which identifies one or more significant adverse environmental effects and where findings with respect to changes or alterations in the project have been made, to adopt a “…reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoi d significant effects on the environment” (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21081, 21081.6).
A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is required to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are successfully implemented. The City of Rocklin is the Lead Agency for the project and is responsible for implementation of the MMRP . This report describes the MMRP for the Project and identifies the parties that will be responsible for monitoring implementation of the individual mitigation measures in the MMRP .
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The MMRP for the Project will be active through all phases of the Project, including design, construction, and operation. The attached table identifies the mitigation program required to be implemented by the City for the Project. The table identifies mitigation measures required by the C ity to mitigate or avoid significant impacts associated with the implementation of the Project, the timing of implementation, and the responsible party or parties for monitoring compliance.
The MMRP also includes a column that will be used by the compliance monitor (individual responsible for monitoring compliance) to document when implementation of the measure is completed. As individual Plan, Program, Policies; and mitigation measures are completed, the compliance monitor will sign and date the MMRP , indicating that the required actions have been completed.
This MMRP incorporates mitigation measures from the City of Rocklin General Plan Draft EIR SCH No. 2008072115 (GP EIR) as well as Project specific measures implementing the programmatic measures and policies identified in the GP EIR.
371
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 2
July 2026
This page intentionally left blank.
372
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 3
July 2026
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
AIR QUALITY
G P E I R M i ti g a ti o n M e a s u r e 4 . 2 . 1 R e d u c e E x p o s u r e t o T o x i c A i r Contaminants (TACs). Residential development projects and projects categorized as sensitive receptors shall be located an adequate distance from existing and potential sources of toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions such as freeways, major arterials, industrial sites, and hazardous material locations. “Adequate distance” will be based on site-specific conditions, the type and location of sensitive receptors, the types and amounts of potential TAC emissions, mitigation measures which reduce potential health risks from TAC emiss ions, and other factors.
Project
application and CEQA
documentation
Project
Applicant and
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
Review and approval of
CEQA documentation
Initials: ______
Date: ______
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
GP EIR Mitigation Measure 4.10.1: MM 4.10.1 The following shall be added as action steps to the General Plan Update Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element:
• To offset possible losses of sensitive native wildlife and plant habitat (e.g., wetland habitat, riparian habitat, and oak woodlands) due to development projects, developers shall be responsible for mitigation. Such mitigation measures may include providing and permanently maintaining similar quality and quantity of replacement habitat, enhancing existing habitat areas, or paying fees towards an approved habitat mitigation bank. Replacement habitat may occur either on -site or at approved off-site locations.
• For those areas in which special -status species are found or are likely to occur, the City shall require feasible mitigation of impacts to those species that ensure that the activity does not Before and during
construction
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
The City of Rocklin
Community Development
Department will examine
Project contracts for these
requirements and monitor
for compliance
Initials: ______
Date: ______
373
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 4
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
contribute to the decline of the affected species such that their decline would impact the viability of the species. Mitigation shall be determined by the City after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Game
(CDFG) are provided an opportunity to comment.
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Crotch’s Bumble Bee Surveys and Avoidance.
If ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to begin between February 1 and October 31, Crotch’s bumble bee pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist based on CDFW’s survey guidance for CESA candidate bumble bee species. Surve ys shall consist of a habitat assessment evaluating the likelihood of bumble bees occurring within and adjacent to the Project site. If the habitat assessment finds that the site does not contain suitable habitat for Crotch’s bumble bee, no further surveys shall be required. If suitable habitat is present, focused surveys shall be conducted, consisting of three onsite surveys spaced two to four weeks apart during the colony active period from April through August. If Crotch’s bumble bee is detected on the P roject site, the Project shall develop a plan to fully avoid impacts to the species. If impacts cannot be feasibly avoided, the Project applicant shall consult with CDFW and obtain appropriate take authorization pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080 et seq. The Project shall comply with the mitigation measures detailed in the take authorization issued by CDFW.
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
Results of pre-activity field
survey shall be submitted
to the City of Rocklin
Community Development
Department
If Crotch’s Bumble Bees
are encountered, focused
survey report shall be
submitted to the City of
Rocklin Community
Development Department
Initials: ______
Date: ______
Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Nesting Bird Surveys and Avoidance. To avoid direct and indirect impacts to raptors and/or migratory birds, grubbing and clearing of vegetation that may support active nests and construction activities adjacent to nesting habitat shall occur outside of the breeding season, generally January 15 through August 31. If removal of habitat and/or construction activities adjacent to nesting habitat are necessary during the breeding season, the Project shall retain a qualified biologist Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
Results of pre-activity field
survey shall be submitted
to the City of Rocklin
Community Development
Department
If nests are encountered,
monitoring report shall be
Initials: ______
Date: ______
374
Pacific and Midas 15183 Consistency Analysis and Checklist Appendices A–G are available for public review at Rocklin City Hall, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, CA.
For questions, please contact the Planner of the Day:
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 625-5100
375
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 5
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
to conduct a pre -construction survey to determine the presence or absence of non-listed nesting migratory birds on or within 300 feet of the construction area, and federally or State -listed birds and raptors on or within 500 feet of the construction area. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted within three calendar days prior to the start of construction. If nesting birds are detected, no -work buffers shall be established, including 300 feet for non-listed nesting migratory birds and 500 feet for listed birds or raptors, unless reduced by a qualified biologist based on site -specific conditions. If construction must occur within the recommended buffer, a qualified biologist shall be present to monitor nesting behavior and determine the appropriate nest buffer. submitted to the City of
Rocklin Community
Development Department
Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Seasonal Depression Avoidance. The Project has been designed to avoid direct impacts to the onsite portion of the seasonal depression. To ensure no indirect impacts to the seasonal depression, Project impact areas shall be clearly demarcated prior to construction, and all workers shall be made aware of the impact limits and avoided areas. No ground - or vegetation-disturbing activities shall occur outside of the Project impact limits, and all vehicles and equipment shall be restricted to the Project impact limits or existing designated access roads and staging areas. Erosion control measures shall be placed between the avoided seasonal depression and the outer edge of the impact limits prior to commencement of construction activities and shall be maintained until construction is completed and soils have stabilized. A qualified biologist shall conduct worker environmental awareness training for all contractors, work crews, and onsite personnel to aid workers in recognizing sensitive biological resources known to occur on the Project site. T he Project shall retain a qualified biologist on an as - needed basis to assist with potential biological issues that may arise during construction. To avoid introduction and spread of non- native Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
The City of Rocklin
Community Development
Department will examine
Project contracts for these
requirements and monitor
for compliance
Initials: ______
Date: ______
376
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 6
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
invasive plant species, clothing, vehicles, and equipment shall be cleaned prior to entering the Project site, and materials used for the Project, such as fill dirt or erosion control materials, shall be from weed -free locations or certified weed-free.
Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Oak Tree Survey and Compliance. In accordance with the City of Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 17.77 of the Rocklin Municipal Code, an oak tree survey shall be conducted by a certified arborist to document the type, size, and condition of all oak trees measuring 6 inche s or greater in diameter at breast height on the Project site for the purpose of determining whether a n o a k t r e e r e m o v a l p e r m i t i s r e q u i r e d . I f i m p a c t s t o o n s i t e o a k t r e e s would occur, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with the City of Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, which may include off-site tree replacement, contributions to the Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Fund, and/or dedication of land, as determined by the City.
Prior to issuance of
grading permits
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
Verify: (1) completion and
acceptance of the oak tree
survey prior to issuance of
grading permits; (2)
issuance of any required
oak tree removal permits;
and (3) implementation of
required mitigation
measures, including
documentation of
replacement trees,
preservation areas, land
dedication, and/or
payment to the Rocklin
Oak Tree Preservation
Fund, as applicable
Initials: ______
Date: ______
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Mitigation Measure CUL -1: Unanticipated Resources. The developer/permit holder or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of this permit. If during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed:
All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resource shall be halted and the Project archaeologist shall call During ground
disturbing activities
City of Rocklin
Community
Development
Department,
City
Environmental
Services
Manager, or
Confirmation of written
authorization to resume
ground disturbance was
provided by the City
following completion of
the required measures.
Initials: ______
Date: ______
377
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 7
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
the City Environmental Services Manager immediately upon discovery of the cultural resource. A meeting shall be convened between the developer, the Project archaeologist, the Native American tribal representative, and the City Environmental Services Manager to discuss the significance of the find. At the meeting with the aforementioned parties, a decision is to be made, with the concurrence of the City Environmental Services Manager , as to the appropriate treatment (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resource.
Resource evaluations shall be limited to nondestructive analysis.
Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until the appropriate treatment has been accomplished. designated
Tribal Monitor
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Mitigation Measure HAZ -1: Prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of earthwork activities, the Project Applicant shall implement the recommendations identified in the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the project site. Specifically, shallow soils (a pproximately one foot below ground surface) containing arsenic and lead impacts identified near historical boring location G-1 and assessment borings SB -9 a nd S B-10 shall be removed from the project site. Additionally, shallow soils in the vicinity of historical boring locations G-10 and G -13 shall be removed as a precautionary measure due to historically documented arsenic impacts.
Soil removal activities shall be conducted under the oversight of a qualified environmental professional and in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations governing the handling, transportation, and disposal of contaminated soils, inc luding applicable requirements of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board, and/or other appropriate regulatory agencies. Excavated soils shall be properly characterized prior Prior to the issuance
of the grading permit.
Project
Applicant,
Qualified
Environmental
Professional
(QEP); City of
Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
City of Rocklin Community
Development Department
shall verify that: (1) the
recommendations of the
Phase II ESA have been
incorporated into grading
activities; (2)
contaminated soils have
been removed under the
oversight of a Qualified
Environmental
Professional in accordance
with applicable regulatory
requirements; and (3)
documentation has been
submitted demonstrating
the extent of excavation,
Initials: ______
Date: ______
378
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 8
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
to disposal and transported to an appropriately permitted disposal facility or managed in accordance with regulatory agency requirements.
Following completion of soil removal activities, the project applicant shall submit documentation to the City demonstrating completion of the removal activities, including the areas and depths of soil removed, quantities of soil removed, disposal documenta tion, and any confirmation sampling or other verification documentation, as applicable.
to final approval of
grading or issuance of a
certificate of occupancy,
as applicable.
Mitigation Measure HAZ-2: Soil Management Plan. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant in coordination with the Community Development Department, Building Division, for review and approval, and shall detail pro cedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of on-site hazardous materials, including:
• Any subsurface materials exposed during construction
activities that appear potentially contaminated, based on either visual observation or suspect odors, shall be
segregated, stockpiled, and tested for potential
contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for the
applicable use, and cannot be reused on the Project site, it shall be transported by a certified hazardous waste hauler to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations. The appropriate regulatory agency (e.g., DTSC, RWQCB, or County Department of Public Health) shall be
notified as required by law, and all ag ency directives shall be implemented.
Prior to the issuance
of the grading permit.
Project
Applicant,
Qualified
Environmental
Professional
(QEP); City of
Rocklin
Community
Development
Department
City of Rocklin Community
Development Department
shall verify: (1) approval of
the Soil Management Plan
and Health and Safety
Plan prior to issuance of
grading permits; (2)
incorporation of SMP
requirements into
construction plans and
contract documents; (3)
implementation of the
SMP during grading
activities; and (4) receipt
and approval of
documentation
demonstrating
compliance with the SMP ,
including laboratory
analytical results, waste
disposal manifests, and
Initials: ______
Date: ______
379
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 9
July 2026
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Timing
Responsible
Party Verification Method
Date Completed
and Initials
• A Health and Safety Plan (HASP) shall be prepared in
accordance with Cal/OSHA requirements for each
contractor that addresses potential safety and health
hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HASP shall also outl ine proper soil handling procedures and health and safety
requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to
hazardous materials during construction.
• All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. Documentation demonstrating
compliance with the SMP, including laboratory results and waste disposal manifests (if applicable), shall be provided to the Community Development Department, Building
Division prior to final grading approval.
any required agency
correspondence, prior to
final grading approval.
380
Pacific and Midas Apartments Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
City of Rocklin 10
July 2026
This page intentionally left blank.
381
Appendices A–G are available for public review at Rocklin City Hall, 3970 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, CA.
For questions, please contact the Planner of the Day:
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (916) 625-5100
382
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN
APPROVING OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
(Midas Apartments / ENV2026-0008)
WHEREAS, the Midas Apartments project consists of a Design Review (DR2026- 0002) and Notice of Exemption (ENV202 6-0008) to develop a 281-unit multi -family apartment project on a 7.1± acre vacant site; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rocklin’s Environmental Coordinator has review ed the project, and determined that it is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Code of Regulations Section 15183 – Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning and Public Resources Code Section 21083.3; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for the Project.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rocklin recommended approval of the Notice of Exemption by a vote of 5-0 on August 4, 2026.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rocklin as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rocklin finds as follows:
A. The project is exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning).
B. Pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the project is consistent with the use and density established under the existing 2012 General Plan for which the City has a certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR).
C. The Midas Apartments project CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Consistency Checklist, prepared as provided for in the CEQA Guidelines, concluded that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts that were: 1) peculiar to th e project or the parcel on which the project would be located ; 2) were not analyzed as significant effects in the General Plan EIR with which the project is consistent ; 3) were not potentially significant off -site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the General Plan EIR, and 4) were not previously identified significant effects, and which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time the General Plan EIR was certified, were determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR.
383
D. Based upon Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Midas Apartments project’s CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Consistency Checklist identifies the 2012 General Plan Update policies and/or actions that apply to the development of the project and have been determined in the General Plan EIR to substantially mitigate environmental effects. To the extent that the 2012 General Plan Update policies and/or actions substantially mitigate a particular project impact, the impact shall not be considered peculiar, pursuant to Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, thus, eliminating the requirement for further environmental review.
E. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the City of Rocklin finds that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have be en analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is requir ed beyond compliance with the mitigation measures established in the City of Rocklin General Plan EIR, compliance with the City of Rocklin’s uniformly applied development policies or standards, and compliance with the conditions of approval established for the project.
Section 2 . Based on the review and determination of the Environmental Coordinator, and for the reasons stated above and in the Notice of Exemption, attached hereto and incorporated by references herein as Exhibit 1, the City Council of the City of Rocklin finds the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Rocklin hereby approves the Notice of Exemption for the Project.
Section 4. Upon approval of the project by the City Council, the Environmental Coordinator may file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Placer County and with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152(b) of the Public Resources Code and the State EIR Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.
384
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on THIS 25th day of August, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
____________________________________
David Bass, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk
385
Reso No. 2026-
Exhibit 1
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: County Clerk, County of Placer FROM: City of Rocklin 2954 Richardson Blvd. Community Dev. Dept.
Auburn, CA 95604-5228 3970 Rocklin Road
Rocklin, CA 95677
Project Title: Midas Apartments - DR2026-0002 and ENV2026-0008 Project Location - Specific: The project site is located at the northwest corner of Pacific Street and Midas Avenue (APNs: 010-010-016, -017, -028, and -029; and 010-040-040).
Project Location - City: Rocklin, CA; County: Placer
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: The project is a request for approval of a Design Review to develop an approximately 7.1-acre undeveloped site with a 100-percent affordable multiple-family/apartment community. The project includes construction of three (3) multi-family buildings, containing a total of 281 units, along with a new parking lot, drive aisles, community facility, playground, and associated infrastructure. The proposal also incorporates site landscaping, signage, lighting, and utility connections necessary to support operation of the multi-family facility.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Rocklin Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: The property owner is Paxion Rocklin AH LP, and the project applicant is Oren Hillel and Garrett Borges with Waterford Property Company and Cypress Equity Investments.
Exempt Status (Check one)
_x_ Statutory Exemption (California Code of Regulations Sec. 15 183): Section 15183 - Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning , Public Resources Code Section 21083.3
Reasons why the project is exempt. The project involves the establishment and operation of a 281-unit multi-family apartment project on a 7.1± acre undeveloped site.
The Pacific and Midas Apartments Project CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Consistency Analysis and Checklist concluded the proposed project is consistent with the development density established in the General Plan and is within the scope of the Prior FEIR and that no further CEQA documentation is required under Section 15183. The proposed project is exempt from CEQA, and further environmental analysis of the proposed project is not required for the following reasons:
1) No peculiar impacts have been identified as a result of the proposed project or its site. Adherence to General Plan policies and standards along with regulations of City and incorporation of identified project design features ensure impacts are below the level of significance; and
386
Reso No. 2026-
2) There are no pote ntially significant impacts that were not analyzed as significant in the certified Prior FEIR. There are no potentially significant off -site and/or cumulative impacts that were not discussed by the certified Prior FEIR; and 3) No substantial changes are prop osed in the project which will require major revisions of the certified Prior FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
4) No substantial ch anges have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the certified Prior FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, and
5) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the certified Prior FEIR was certified as complete.
The project as proposed is consistent with the exemption class description noted above and is exempt pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 20183.3 of the CEQA Statutes.
Contact Person: David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Department Director
Date received for Filing: _______________________________________
Signature: ____________________________________________________________ David Mohlenbrok, Community Development Department Director
387
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ROCKLIN APPROVING A DESIGN REVIEW
(Midas Apartments / DR2026-0002)
The City Council of the City of Rocklin does resolve as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Rocklin finds and determines that:
WHEREAS, t he Design Review (DR2026-0002) approves the site design, landscaping, architectural designs, colors and materials for the Midas Apartments project; a 281-unit apartment community on a 7.1± acre vacant site. The project site is located at the northwest corner of Pacific Street and Midas Avenue, City of Rocklin (APNs: 010-010-016, -017, -028, and -029; and 010-040-040).
WHEREAS, the City of Rocklin’s Environmental Coordinator has reviewed the project, and determined that it is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Code of Regulations Section 15183 – Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning. A Notice of Exemption (NOE) has been recommended for approval via Planning Commission Resolution No. PC-2026-XXXX.
WHEREAS, the design of the site is compatible with the surrounding development, natural features, site constraints, and traffic circulation.
WHEREAS, the height, bulk, area, color scheme, and materials of the b uildings and structures are compatible with surrounding development. The project is not located within an adopted Architectural District and, as proposed, is consistent with the Citywide Design Guidelines and all applicable objective design standards pursuant to Government Code Section 65913.4. The proposed color palette consists of neutral and muted earth tones, consistent with the surrounding area.
WHEREAS, the buildings and structures have been oriented with consideration given to minimizing energy con sumption and maximizing use of natural lighting. The project design incorporates sustainable features consistent with the California Green Building Standards Code ( “CALGreen”). The project provides electric vehicle charging spaces consistent with CAL Green. The project shall be consistent with all California Building Code requirements. The project is consistent with the style, type, and orientation of lighting with nearby multi-family residential complexes, as well as with the requirements of the Citywide Design Guidelines.
WHEREAS, parking is consistent with requirements set forth in Assembly Bill 2097 (AB2097), which prohibits a local agency from establishing minimum parking standards for residential developments within ½ mile of a transit stop, and despite these requirements, the project is providing at total of 381 onsite vehicle parking spaces. 388
Reso. No.
WHEREAS, t he landscaping design is compatible with surrounding developments and has been designed with provisions for minimizing water usage and maintenance n eeds. The landscaping is also consistent with the requirements of the Citywide Design Guidelines. The landscape concept is water-efficient, low maintenance, and will complement the buildings and make a positive contribution to the site’s overall aesthetics. Low -profile shrubs, including screening shrubs, are planned along with shade and canopy trees. The planting design features various drought-tolerant, and fire- resistant species to create layers of color and text ure to complement the architectural style and setting.
WHEREAS, the design of the site and buildings or structure s is consistent with the goal and policies of the General Plan, as well as the High Density Residential (HDR) land use designation, the Residential Minimum Density Overlay Mixed Use 24 Dwellings per acre minimum (RMDO -24+) and the Planned Development Residential – 33 Dwelling Units Per Acre (PD-33) zoning, and all other City regulations, standards, and restrictions. The buildings are consistent with the objective standards in the Citywide Design Guidelines.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rocklin recommended approval of the Design Review (DR2026-0002) by a vote of 5-0 on August 4, 2026.
Section 2. The Design Review for the Midas Apartments (DR2026-0002) as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby recommended for approval subject to the conditions listed below. The approved Exhibit A shall govern the design and construction of the project. Any condition directly addressing an element incorporated into Exhibit A shall be controlling and shall modify Exhibit A . All other plans, specifications, details, and information contained within Exhibit A shall be specifically applicable to the project and shall be construed as if directly stated within the conditions for approval. Unless otherwise expressly stated, the applicant / developer shall be solely responsible for satisfying each condition prior to a final Building Permit Inspection or Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy as applicable.
The agency and / or City department(s) responsible for ensuring implementation of each condition is indicated in parenthesis with each condition.
A. Notice to Applicant of Fees & Exaction Appeal Period
The conditions of project approva l set forth herein include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code §66020(d), these conditions constitute written notice of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions.
The applicant is hereby notified that the 90 -day protest period, commencing from the date of approval of the project, has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest regarding any of the fees, dedication require ments, reservation requirements or other exaction contained in this notice, complying with all the requirements of Government Code §66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 389
Reso. No.
B. Conditions
1. Conditions Matrix
Prior to or concurrently with the submittal of improvement plans, the applicant shall provide a Conditions Matrix, which addresses when and how each of the required conditions of approvals and mitigation measures will be completed.
2. Utilities
a. All utilities, including but not limited to water, sewer, telephone, electricity, and conduit for cable television shall be provided to the project in compliance with all -applicable standards and requirements of the applicable provider. (APPLICABLE UTILITY)
b. Solid Waste Disposal – The applicant shall install masonry trash enclosures with solid metal gates to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. The location and design of trash enclosures shall provide for a minimum clear width and gate opening of 11 feet, a minimum interior depth of 14 feet (to accommodate two trash bins), and gates designed to clear adjacent curbing to the satisfaction of Recology Auburn Placer or if no trash enclosures are proposed, the project shall provide an indoor trash room (s) sized to a ccommodate the required refuse and recycling bins. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall provide a will-serve letter from Recology Auburn Placer. Bins shall be relocated to the designated pickup area on collection days, subject to Re cology Auburn Placer approval . (RECOLOGY AUBURN PLACER,
ENGINEERING, BUILDING, PLANNING)
c. Prior to issuance of improvement plans , the project shall obtain necessary easements, on- and off-site, as required to accommodate water services, to the satisfaction of Placer County Water Agency (“PCWA”). (PCWA)
d. Prior to issuance of improvement plans, the project shall obtain necessary easements, on- and off-site, as required to accommodate sewer services, to the satisfaction of South Placer Municipal Utility Distri ct (“ SPMUD”). (SPMUD)
3. Schools
At the time of issuance of a building permit (or per an approved fee deferral agreement), the developer shall pay to the Rocklin Unified School District all fees required under Education Code section 17620 and Government Code S ection 65995. (ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, BUILDING)
390
Reso. No.
4. Fire
a. Fire sprinkler risers for each building shall be located in a room which conforms to the requirements of the current California Fire Code and Rocklin Fire Department “Fire Control Room” standard. If a fire pump is required, the Fire Control Room shall meet the requirements for a dedicated fire pump room. (FIRE)
b. A Knox box shall be provided at the Fire Control Room / Fire Riser Room at each building. An additional Knox box shall be provid ed at the clubhouse main entry door. (FIRE)
c. Fire apparatus access roads and an approved water supply for fire protection, either temporary or permanent, shall be made available as soon as combustible building materials arrive on site , and a minimum fire flow of 500 gallons per minute shall be provided. The fire hydrant used to provide this fire flow supply shall be within 500 feet of the combustible building materials, as measured along an approved fire apparatus access lane. Where the site configuration i s such that one fire hydrant cannot be located within 500 feet of all combustible building materials, additional fire hydrants shall be required to provide coverage. Full fire -flow is required upon commencement of combustible vertical construction. F ire department access roadways shall be paved upon commencement of vertical construction. (FIRE)
d. A Site Safety Plan which complies with the current California Fire Code is required to be approved by Rocklin Fire Department prior to permit issuance of the first building permit. (FIRE)
e. Fire Department approval of proposed address numbers, way -finding signage and unit signage for the buildings is required. Addressing for the project shall comply with the California Fire Code and Rocklin Fire Department “Prem ises I dentification-Posting of Building Addresses” guidelines. (FIRE)
f. If the project is to be phased, a phasing plan with a detailed exhibit showing how emergency access and access to fire hydrants will be maintained throughout all phases, will be required to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief, prior to issuance of the first building permit. (FIRE)
g. Fire hydrant locations and distribution shall be provided in accordance with the current versions of the CFC, Appendix C. (FIRE)
h. The private fire service main serving the entire parcel shall be configured as a looped system and shall connect to the public water supply at two 391
Reso. No.
separate locations. The looped arrangement and dual connections shall comply with the California Fire Code (CFC) and NFPA 24, Standard for the I nstallation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances. (FIRE)
i. Fire Department Connection ( FDC) address shall be as follows - Sign shall have minimum dimensions of 5” x 8” and shall be constructed of steel or aluminum and attached to the appliance(s) with a “U” -bolt or bent all thread. Sign shall be painted red or red vinyl with all white lettering, minimum 1-inch in height an shall indicate which building the FDC serves. (FIRE)
j. An Emergency Responder Communication Enhancement System (ERCES) ma y be required to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.
Testing of the communication coverage within the buildings is required to be conducted by an approved third -party contractor once the building enclosure — including exterior walls, windows, do ors, a nd roofing — is substantially complete, to ensure accurate and representative test results.
Should testing determine that a full ERCES installation is required, a separate permit for the ERCES system is required to be reviewed and approved prior to installation. (FIRE)
k. Demonstrate that ground ladders can be safely deployed to access second, third, and fourth floor rescue windows and confirm that site topography and landscaping will not impede achieving a 75 -degree climbing angle. (FIRE)
l. Improvement Plans shall indicate the location and size of water mains, fire hydrants, and all fire appurtenances in compliance with the California Fire Code, California Building Code, NFPA 24, and applicable Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) water system standards. (PCWA). (PCWA,
ENGINEERING, FIRE)
m. Improvement Plans shall depict a private fire service loop designed and installed in accordance with the currently adopted edition of the California Fire Code (CFC), NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, and applicable PCWA standards. (PCWA, ENGINEERING, FIRE)
n. Plans shall reflect compliance with all applicable national, state, and local Fire Codes. (FIRE)
5. Improvements / Improvement Plans
Prior to any grading, site impro vements, or other construction activities associated with this project, improvement plans shall be prepared consistent with 392
Reso. No.
the exhibits and conditions incorporated as a part of this entitlement, and in compliance with all applicable city standards, for the review and approval of the City Engineer, Public Works Director and/or the Community Development Director.
Improvement plans shall be valid for a period of two years from date of approval by the City Engineer. If substantial work has not been commenced within that time, or if the work is not diligently pursued to completion thereafter, the City Engineer may require the improvement plans to be resubmitted and/or modified to reflect changes in the standard specifications or other circumstances.
The project improvement plans shall include the following:
(ENGINEERING, PUBLIC WORKS, PLANNING)
a. A detailed grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer, in substantial compliance with the approved project exhibit(s) and in accord with the City of Rocklin Post -Construction Manual . The grading and drainage plan shall include the following:
1) Stormwater Management
a) Prior to issuance of improvement plans, to ensure
compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS4 s Gene ral Permit and the regulations and
orders of the State Water Resources Control Board, the
applicant shall prepare and implement an approved
Stormwater Control Plan and Stormwater Management
Facility Operation and Maintenance Plan in accordance with the City of Rocklin Post -Construction Manual for the on -site treatment systems and hydromodification controls (if any, or acceptable alternative to the satisfaction of the City Engineer).as approved by the City Engineer for compliance with the City's Post -Construction Manual and adopted
engineering standards. All specified treatment systems and hydromodification controls shall be privately owned and maintained. (BUILDING, PUBLIC WORKS)
b) Prior to issuance of improvement plans, unless waived by the City Engineer and Environmental Services Coordinator, the developer shall grant a Stormwater Management
Compliance Easement over the project site to the City of Rocklin, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The Stormwater Management Compliance Easement shall be
recorded with the Placer County Clerk’s office and a copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the
Environmental Services division. Said easement shall
393
Reso. No.
provide for the following: (CITY ATTORNEY, BUILDING,
PUBLIC WORKS)
i. Grant site access to City employ ees for the purpose of performing operations and maintenance
inspections of the installed treatment system(s) and
hydromodification control(s) (if any).
ii. Grant site access to City employees for the purpose of performing operations and maintenance wor k on
the installed treatment system(s) and
hydromodification control(s) (if any) in the event that that the Director of Public Works determines, based
upon the inspection results, that said work is not
being performed adequately and has or will
compromise the sy stem’s ability to function as
required.
iii. A statement that the City may, at its option, cause the operational and maintenance responsibilities set forth
in the Stormwater Management Facility Operation and
Maintenance Plan to be performed and plac e a
special assessment against the project site to recover
the costs to the City in the event the project is not
operated and maintained in accord with the approved
Stormwater Management Facility Operation and
Maintenance Plan. (RMC §8.30.150).
c) All storm drainage inlets shall be stamped with City Engineer approved wording indicating that dumping of waste is
prohibited and identifying that the inlets drain into the creek system.
d) Site design measures for detaining run off at pre -
development levels, includ ing lo cation and specifications of oversized pipes, on-site or off-site detention basins, if any, or other acceptable methods.
e) Drainage management areas including drainage features, such as lined drainage swales.
f) The developer shall prepare a Storm Water Poll utant Protection Plan (SWPPP) for review and approval by the
State Regional Water Quality Control Board as part of the project’s drainage improvement plans.
394
Reso. No.
2) Prior to the commencement of grading operations, and if the project site will not balanc e with respect to grading, the contractor shall identify the site where any excess earthen material shall be deposited. If the deposit site is within the City of Rocklin, the contractor shall submit a report issued by a technical engineer to verify that the expo rted materials are suitable for the intended fill and show proof of all approved grading plans. Haul routes to be used shall be specified. If the site requires importing of earthen material, then prior to the commencement of grading operations, the c ontractor shall identify the site where the imported earthen material is coming from and the contractor shall submit a report issued by a technical engineer to verify that the imported materials are suitable for the intended fill and show proof of all approved grading plans. Haul routes to be used shall be specified.
3) If at any time during the course of grading or construction activities evidence of the existence of old wells, septic systems or other similar features or any other evidence of soil and/or groundwater contamination with hazardous material is encountered, work shall be halted within 100 feet of the find and the City of Rocklin Engineer shall be notified. The City Engineer shall make a determination as to the nature of the feature(s) (and/or contamination, the appropriate size for a buffer around the feature beyond which work could continue on the balance of the site, and which outside agencies, if any, should be notified and involved in addressing and / or remediation of the feature or contami nation. At the applicant’s expense, a qualified consultant(s) shall be retained to assess and characterize the feature or contamination and to determine appropriate remediation, if any. Remediation of the feature including obtaining any special permits and/or ap provals as needed shall be completed and documented in accordance with the adopted standards of the City Engineer and any responsible agencies, such as but not limited to the Placer County Department of Environmental Health, and the Central Valley Re gional Water Quality Control Board , prior to completion of grading / construction in the affected area.
b. All on-site standard improvements, including but not limited to:
1) All access and grading improvements as shown on Exhibit A. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
2) Paving, curbs (including concrete curbs to contain all landscape areas adjacent to vehicle parking areas or travel lanes), gutters, sidewalks, drainage improvements, irrigation improvements (main 395
Reso. No.
lines and distribution whe n located under paved areas), u tility improvements, parking lot lights, fire hydrants, retaining walls, fences, pilasters, enhanced pavement treatments, trash
enclosures, etc. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
3) All necessary easements for drainage, access, utilities, etc. shall be shown and offered for dedication (or Irrevocable Offer of Dedication provided) with the improvement plans . (PLANNING,
ENGINEERING)
4) Dedication of Road Right-of-Way on Pacific Street and Midas Avenue over any areas of existing roadway easement and not currently City Right -of-Way, shall be shown on the plans, and irrevocably offered for dedication to the City via separate process. (ENGINEERING)
5) To the extent possible underground facilities , as shown on Exhibit A, such as but not limited to electrical, gas, water, drainage, and irrigation lines shall be located outside of or to the edge of areas designated for landscaping so as to minimize impacts to the viability of these areas. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
c. The following off-site improvements:
1) As shown on Sheet C4.0 of Exhibit 1, the project shall construct the following: a roadway taper on the north side of Midas Avenue at the project driveway, a rolled curb and gutter on the north side of Pacific Street for sewer access for South Placer Municipal Utilities District, and install median improvements on Pacific Street, per City Improvement Standards 4 -26 (G) and install a no left turn sign . (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
d. A detailed parking lot signage and striping plan designed per City standards that indicates all parking spaces, a isles, entrances, and exits, including on -site signage and any required offsite signage in the public right-of-way. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
e. Prior to any grading or construction activities including issuance of improvement plans, the developer shall submit a design-level soil investigation for the review and approval of the City Engineer and Chief Building Official that evaluates soil and rock conditions, particularly the potential for expansive soils. The professional engineer that prepared the soil investigation shall recommend appropriate roadway construction and foundation techniques and other best practices that are to be implemented by the project during construction. These techniques and practices shall 396
Reso. No.
address expansive soils or other geological concern s requiring remediation, including but not limited to:
Recommendations for building pad and footing construction; Use of soil stabilizers or other additives; and
Recommendations for surface drainage.
(BUILDING, ENGINEERING)
f. Notes addressing con formance with the development standards and requirements of the City of Rocklin shall be included on the project improvement plans, including but not limited to the following: (PLANNING,
ENGINEERING)
1) Prior to commencement of grading, the developer shall submit a Construction Emission / Dust Control Plan for approval by the City Engineer and the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (“Placer County APCD”) . This plan must address how the project meets the minimum requirements of sections 300 and 400 of Rule 228-Fugitive Dust.
2) Any diesel-powered equipment used during project construction shall be Air Resources Board (“ARB”) certified.
3) The prime contractor shall submit to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District a comprehensive inventory (e.g., make , model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy -duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used in aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the Placer County APCD prior to the new equipment being utilized.
At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy -duty off-road equipment, the project representative shall provide the Placer County APCD with the ant icipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.
4) Construction equipment exhaust emissions shall not exceed Placer County APCD Rule 202 Visible Emission limitatio ns. O perators of vehicles and equipment found to exceed opacity limits are to be immediately notified by Placer County APCD to cease operations and the equipment must be repaired within 72 hours.
5) Processes that discharge 2 pounds per day or more of air contaminants, as defined by California State Health and Safety Code Section 39013, to the atmosphere may require a permit. 397
Reso. No.
Developers / Contractors should contact the Placer County APCD prior to construction or use of equipment and obtain any necessary permits.
6) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.
7) Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces shall be posted at 15 mph or less.
8) During construction the contractor shall utilize ex isting power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean fuel (e.g., gasoline, biodiesel, natural gas) generators to minimize the use of temporary diesel power generators.
9) All construction equipment shall be maintained in clean condition.
10) The prime contra ctor s hall be responsible for keeping adjacent public thoroughfares clean of silt, dirt, mud, and debris, and shall “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
11) If fill dirt is brought to or exported from the construction site, tarps or soil stabilizers shall be placed on the dirt piles to minimize dust problems.
12) All grading operations shall be suspended when fugitive dust emissions exc eed Placer County APCD Rule 228 -Fugitive Dust limitations. The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual who is California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) certified to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations ( “VEE”). This individual shall evaluate compliance with Rule 228 on a weekly basis.
13) Fugitive dust emissions shall not exceed 40% opacity and shall not go beyond the property boundary at any time. If lime or other drying agents are utilized to dry out wet grading areas, the developer s hall ensure such agents are controlled so as not to exceed Placer County APCD Rule 228-Fugitive Dust limitations.
14) The prime contractor shall suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are excessive and dust is impacting adjacent properties.
15) Water shall be applied to control fugitive dust, as needed, to prevent impacts offsite. Operational water trucks shall be onsite to 398
Reso. No.
control fugitive dust. Construction vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt , mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site.
16) In order to minimize wind driven dust during construction, the prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of a vegetative cover, paving, (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City).
17) Open burning of any kind shall be prohibited. All removed vegetative material shall be either chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a site is not available, a licensed disposal site.
18) Chemical soil stabilizers, vegetative mats, or other appropriate best management practices to prevent erosion , in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications, shall be applied to all -inactive construction areas (previously graded areas which remain inactive for 96 hours).
19) All exposed surfaces shall be revegetated as quickly as feasible.
g. The following mitigation measures are applicable to the project, and shall be included in the project notes on the improvement plans.
1) Mitigation Measure BIO-1 – Crotch's Bumble Bee Surveys and Avoidance
If ground -disturbing activities are scheduled to begin between February 1 and October 31, Crotch’s bumble bee pre -construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist based on CDFW’s survey guidance for CESA candidate bumble bee species.
Surveys shall consist of a habitat assessment evaluating the likelihood of bumble bees occurring within and adjacent to the Project site. If the habitat assessment finds that the site does not contain suitable habitat for Crotch’s bumble bee, no further surveys shall be required. If suitable habitat is present, focused surveys shall be conducted, consisting of three onsite surveys spaced two to four weeks apart during the colony active period from April through August. If Cro tch’s bumble bee is detected on the Project site, the Project shall develop a plan to fully avoid impacts to the species. If impacts cannot be feasibly avoided, the Project applicant shall consult with CDFW and obtain appropriate take authorization pursuant to Fish and Game Code Section 2080 et seq. The Project 399
Reso. No.
shall comply with the mitigation measures detailed in the take authorization issued by CDFW.
2) Mitigation Measure BIO-2 – Nesting Bird Surveys and
Avoidance
To avoid direct and indirect impacts to raptors and/or migratory birds, grubbing and clearing of vegetation that may support active nests and construction activities adjacent to nesting habitat shall occur outside of the breeding season, generally January 15 through August 31. If removal o f habi tat and/or construction activities adjacent to nesting habitat are necessary during the breeding season, the Project shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre-construction survey to determine the presence or absence of non-listed nesting migrator y birds on or within 300 feet of the construction area, and federally or State -listed birds and raptors on or within 500 feet of the construction area. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted within three calendar days prior to the start of co nstruction. If nesting birds are detected, no -work buffers shall be established, including 300 feet for non -listed nesting migratory birds and 500 feet for listed birds or raptors, unless reduced by a qualified biologist based on site -specific conditions. If construction must occur within the recommended buffer, a qualified biologist shall be present to monitor nesting behavior and determine the appropriate nest buffer.
3) Mitigation Measure BIO-3 – Seasonal Depression Avoidance
The Project has been designed to avoid direct impacts to the onsite portion of the seasonal depression. To ensure no indirect impacts to the seasonal depression, Project impact areas shall be clearly demarcated prior to construction, and all workers shall be made aware of the impact limit s and avoided areas. No ground - or vegetation-disturbing activities shall occur outside of the Project impact limits, and all vehicles and equipment shall be restricted to the Project impact limits or existing designated access roads and staging area s. Erosion control measures shall be placed between the avoided seasonal depression and the outer edge of the impact limits prior to commencement of construction activities and shall be maintained until construction is completed and soils have stabilized.
A qualified biologist shall conduct worker environmental awareness training for all contractors, work crews, and onsite personnel to aid workers in recognizing sensitive biological resources known to occur on the Project site. The Project shall retain a qu alified biologist on an as -needed basis to assist with potential biological issues that may arise during construction. To avoid introduction and 400
Reso. No.
spread of non-native invasive plant species, clothing, vehicles, and equipment shall be cleaned prior to entering the Project site, and materials used for the Project, such as fill dirt or erosion control materials, shall be from weed-free locations or certified weed-free.
4) Mitigation Measure BIO-4 – Oak Tree Survey and Compliance
In accordance with the City of Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, Chapter 17.77 of the Rocklin Municipal Code, an oak tree survey shall be conducted by a certified arborist to document the type, size, and condition of all oak trees measuring 6 inches or greater in diameter at breast hei ght on the Project site for the purpose of determining whether an oak tree removal permit is required. If impacts to onsite oak trees would occur, mitigation shall be provided in accordance with the City of Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Ordinance, wh ich ma y include off -site tree replacement, contributions to the Rocklin Oak Tree Preservation Fund, and/or dedication of land, as determined by the City.
5) Mitigation Measure CUL-1 – Unanticipated Cultural Resources
The developer/permit holder or any successor in interest shall comply with the following for the life of this permit. If during ground disturbance activities, unanticipated cultural resources are discovered, the following procedures shall be followed:
All ground disturbance within 100 feet of the d iscovery shall immediately stop. The Project archaeologist shall notify the City Environmental Services Manager. A meeting shall be convened among the developer, Project archaeologist, Native American tribal representative, and City Environmental Services Manager. The parties shall determine the appropriate treatment of the resource, such as documentation, recovery, or avoidance. Resource evaluations shall be limited to nondestructive analysis.
Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the discovery area until the required treatment has been completed.
6) Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 – Implementation of Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Recommendations
Prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of earthwork activities, the Project A pplicant shall implement the recommendations identified in the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment prepared for the project site. Specifically, shallow soils (approximately one foot below ground surface) containing arsenic 401
Reso. No.
and lead impacts identif ied near historical boring location G -1 and assessment borings SB -9 and SB -10 shall be removed from the project site. Additionally, shallow soils in the vicinity of historical boring locations G -10 and G -13 shall be removed as a
precautionary measure due to hist orically documented arsenic impacts.
Soil removal activities shall be conducted under the oversight of a qualified environmental professional and in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations governing the handling, transport ation, and disposal of contaminated soils, including applicable requirements of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Regional Water Quality Control Board, and/or other appropriate regulatory agencies. Excavated soils shall be properly ch aracterized prior to disposal and transported to an appropriately permitted disposal facility or managed in accordance with regulatory agency requirements.
Following completion of soil removal activities, the project applicant shall submit documentation to the City demonstrating completion of the removal activities, including the areas and depths of soil removed, quantities of soil removed, disposal documentation, and any confirmation sampling or other verification documentation, as applicable.
7) Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 – Soil Management Plan
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be prepared by a qualified hazardous materials consultant in coordination with the Community Development Department, Building Divisio n, for review and approval, and shall detail procedures and protocols for excavation and disposal of on - site hazardous materials, including:
Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear potentially contaminated, based on either vi sual observation or suspect odors, shall be segregated, stockpiled, and tested for potential contamination. If contamination is found to be present per the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for the applicable use, and cannot be reused on the Project site, it shall be transported by a certified hazardous waste hauler to a landfill permitted by the state to accept hazardous materials and disposed of per California Hazardous Waste Regulations. The appropriate regulatory agency (e.g., DTSC, RWQCB, or County 402
Reso. No.
Department of Public Health) shall be notified as required by law, and all agency directives shall be implemented.
A Health and Safety Plan (HASP) shall be prepared in
accordance with Cal/OSHA requirements for each contractor that addresses potential safety and health hazards and includes the requirements and procedures for employee protection. The HASP shall also outline proper soil handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction.
All SMP measures shall be printed on the construction documents, contracts, and project plans prior to issuance of grading permits. Documentation demonstrating compliance with the SMP , including laboratory results and waste disposal manifests (if applicable), shall be provided to the Community Development Department, Building Division prior to final grading approval.
6. Improvements in the Public Right-of-Way
a. The applicant shall obta in an encroachment permit for all improvements within the public right -of-way. Applicant shall post a performance bond and labor and materials payment bond (or other equivalent financial security) in the amount of 100% of the cost of the improvements to be constructed in the public right -of-way as improvement security to ensure the faithful performance of all duties and obligations required of applicant in the construction of the improvements. Such improvement security shall be in a form acceptable to the C ity Attorney. Such security shall be either a corporate surety bond, a letter of credit, or other instrument of credit issued by a banking institution subject to regulation by the State or Federal government and pledging that the funds necessary to c arry o ut this Agreement are on deposit and guaranteed for payment, or a cash deposit made either directly with the City or deposited with a recognized escrow agent for the benefit of the City. (PUBLIC WORKS)
7. Landscaping
a. Final landscape plans shall be provided by the developer and approved by the Community Development Director. The landscape plans shall comply with the following requirements (PLANNING):
1) The landscaping plan shall be prepared by a landscape architect and shall include the following general notes:
403
Reso. No.
a) A legend of the common and botanical names of specific plant materials to be used. The legend shall indicate the size of plant materials and appropriate numbers of plants and spacing for groundcovers.
Shrubs shall be a minimum 5 gallon and trees a m inimum of 15 gallon and meet the minimum height specified by the
American Standards for Nursery Stock.
b) Provide two lodgepole wood stakes per tree, unless
otherwise specified on the approved landscape plans or
recommended by the project Landscape Ar chitect based on tree size, species, or site conditions.
c) An irrigation plan including an automatic irrigation system.
The plan shall include drip irrigation wherever possible.
d) Provision for the shading of the visitor parking lot, including parking spaces, man euvering areas, driveways and drive aisles, by shade trees of appropriate size(s) and
characteristic(s) in locations to achieve 50% shading at maturity (15 years from planting). Include a calculation demonstrating compliance with this condition on the plan.
e) Granite or moss rock boulders along the planting strips. .
f) Use of walk-on bark in all planter areas.
g) The plant tags shall not be removed until the final inspection of the landscape is complete.
h) Should the existing PG&E transmission line be removed or undergrounded, all future tree plantings within the PG&E easement area shall consist of large -canopy shade tree species (e.g., native oak, sycamore) or the applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating full compliance with applicable parking lot shading requirements.
2) The landscape plan shall be certified by the landscape architect of record that the landscape design complies with the requirements of the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act (Government Code Section 65591 et seq.) and applicable prov isions of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).
b. The parking/site lighting plan shall be designed to accommodate shade trees and provide for illumination of the parking and circulation areas. 404
Reso. No.
Light standards and underground utilit ies sh all be located such that required parking lot shade trees can still be planted. (ENGINEERING,
BUILDING, PLANNING)
c. All landscaping shall be installed and the landscape architect shall certify, in writing, that the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed in full compliance with the approved plans prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (PLANNING)
d. Any area disturbed by construction activities but not developed or landscaped shall be hydroseeded (with a drought tolerant mix of native flowers and grasses) prior to final inspection / acceptance of improvements. (PLANNING, BUILDING, ENGINEERING)
8. Lighting
a. All exterior lighting shall be designed and installed to avoid adverse glare on adjacent properties. Cut-off shoebox type or decorative lighting fixtures, or equivalent, shall be used and mounted such that all light is projected directly toward the ground. Light poles shall be a maximum of 20 feet in height as measured from grade to the top of the light. The lighting design plan sh all be approved by Community Development Director for compliance with this condition. (PLANNING)
9. Design
a. The back or rear of any parapet wall that may be visible from an adjacent right of way or property shall be painted the same color as the front of the parapet wall to provide a consistent appearance. (PLANNING)
b. Developer installed play equipment shall include either poured in place or rubberized tile flooring, or approved alternative, for accessibility purposes. (BUILDING)
10. Signs
All signs shall conform to the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rocklin and the sign designs and locations as shown on Exhibit A. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING, FIRE)
11. Screening of Mechanical Equipment
a. All mechanical and/or related equipment, such as but not limited to, r oof hatch railings, RTUs, vents, HVAC units, whether ground- or roof-mounted shall be screened from view from all public rights-of-way to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. To the greatest extent feasible, 405
Reso. No.
parapet walls should be used to screen roof -mounted equipment. The design of the screening shall be in harmony with the architectural design of the building. (PLANNING)
b. The appearance of large utility features such as double detector check valves shall be minimized through the us e of utility blankets or other acceptable screening methods. The developer shall also demonstrate that these facilities have been moved as far as possible from the public right - of-way. (PLANNING)
12. Fences and Gates
a. Tubular metal fences /gates shall have flat top pickets (or have a smooth rail at the top), be painted (black/brown/dark green), and be constructed of medium gauge, or better, steel or aluminum. Painted finishes shall be maintained in good condition and shall be periodically recoated as necessary to prevent peeling, fading, rust, or deterioration. (PLANNING /
PUBLIC WORKS)
13. Security
a. Prior to building / unit occupancy the property owner, or each tenant, shall obtain and maintain at all times, an Alarm System Permit for each se curity system installed and operated in the building / shopping center / complex, if any, in accord with the requirements of Chapter 9.44 of the Rocklin Municipal Code. (POLICE)
14. Outdoor Storage
All incidental and miscellaneous outdoor storage areas shall be completely screened from public view. (PLANNING)
15. Maintenance
a. The property owner shall remove within 72 hours all graffiti placed on any fence, wall, existing building, paved area or structure on the property consistent with the provision s of R ocklin Municipal Code Section 9.32.
Prior to removal of said graffiti, the property owner shall report the graffiti vandalism to the Rocklin Police Department. (PLANNING, POLICE)
b. The project, including but not limited to paving, landscaping, structure s, and improvements shall be maintained by the property owners, to the standard of similarly situated properties in equivalent use zones, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. (PLANNING)
406
Reso. No.
16. Parks
a. Park fees shall be paid as required by the Rocklin Municipal Code Chapter
17.71 and Chapter 16.28. (ENGINEERING)
17. Noise
Project design and construction shall incorporate all features, modifications, and elements necessary to comply with the interior and exterior noise standards se t forth in the Rocklin General Plan Policies N -6 and N -9, and the City’s Noise Ordinance.
The following shall be conditions of construction activity and included in the Improvement Plan notes: (ENGINEERING, PUBLIC WORKS – SERVICES,
BUILDING)
a. All "sel f-powered" equipment, stationary noise sources (i.e. pumps, electrical generators, etc.), and construction equipment shall be equipped with factory noise control devices (e.g., mufflers) and shall be maintained in good working order. (ENGINEERING, BUILDING)
b. Equipment “warm -up” areas, water storage tanks, equipment storage areas, and stationary noise -generating machinery (i.e. pumps, electrical generators, etc.) shall be located away from existing residences and other sensitive noise receptors to the ex tent feasible. Equipment staging and “warm up” areas shall be identified or noted on the improvement plans or and building plans. (ENGINEERING, BUILDING)
c. All phases of project development shall be subject to the City of Rocklin Municipal Code (RMC) Ch apter 9.52, Noise Standards, including restricting construction -related noise generating activities that generate any discernable noise in or within 100 feet of an occupied residence between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, and between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekends. The Community Development Director may grant exceptions to any of the noise restrictions in RMC Chapter 9.52 if special and unusual circumstances exist that make strict adherence infeasible or impracticable. (ENGINEERING, BUILDING)
d. The property owner shall provide a Noise Coordinator and adhere to the following: (ENGINEERING, BUILDING)
1) As a function of on -site project management, an on -site Noise Coordinator shall be employed by the property owner or designee, and their na me, email address, and telephone number along with instructions on how to file a noise complaint shall be posted conspicuously around the project site, and at all vehicle entrances 407
Reso. No.
to public streets, during all project construction phases. The posted signage sha ll include the city’s construction hours set forth in Section 9.52.030 (A)(1). The signs shall be weatherproof and a minimum size of 4’x4’ and includes 3-inch-tall minimum lettering.
2) The Noise Coordinator’s duties shall include fielding and documenting no ise complaints, determining the source of the complaint (e.g., piece of construction equipment), determining whether noise levels at the project boundary are within acceptable limits consistent with the General Plan hourly noise standards and time of day r estrictions noted in section 9.52.03 (A)(1) above, and reporting complaints to the City with documented noise levels at the time of complaint via email.
3) The Noise Coordinator shall work, to the extent feasible, with the surrounding residents and project contractors, to schedule activities to minimize disturbance of residents during the daytime hours. Prior to commencement of any early morning or night time work required by the contractor, the City, or utility companies, approval from the Community Developm ent Director is required. The request for approval shall be submitted not less than 72 hours in advance of the work commencing and the Noise Coordinator shall provide documentation of notification to the neighboring property owners.
e. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate that all exterior wall, door, and window assemblies comply with a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 30, consistent with the recommendations identified in the Noise and Vibration Impact Anal ysis dated May 26, 2026. (PLANNING)
18. Air Quality
a. The contractor shall reduce NOX and ROG emissions by complying with the construction vehicle air pollutant control strategies developed by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District. The contractor shall include in construction contracts the following requirements or measures shown to be equally effective:
1) Contractors' construction equipment shall be properly maintained and tuned during construction activity.
2) Contractors shall use low emission mobile construction equipment where possible.
3) Construction equipment exhaust emissions shall not exceed District Rule 202 Visible Emission limitations.
408
Reso. No.
4) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy - duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project.
District personnel, with assistance from the California Air Resources Board, will conduct initial Visible Emission Evaluations of all heavy - duty equipment on the inventory list.
5) Construction contracts shall stipulate that all equipment with horsepower ratings of 350 or greater, including scrapers, used during project grading shall meet th e CARB ’s Tier 3 emissions standards or cleaner.
6) In lieu of or in addition to this requirement, an applicant can use other measures to reduce particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions from their project through the use of emulsified diesel fuel and/or parti culate matter traps. The District shall be contacted to discuss this measure.
19. Phasing
a. If the project proposes a phased development, a phasing plan showing the sequence of site improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Director. The phasing plan shall show the following:
1) The building or buildings to be constructed and all appurtenant structures (walls, fencing, site amenities, etc.) with each Phase;
2) A Temporary Fencing Plan that shows how the residents of the occupied units will be kept from entering active construction areas;
3) Emergency Vehicle access through the site and available fire suppression services for each Phase, to be approved by the Fire Department;
4) The portion of landscaping to be completed with each phase.
b. The Community Development Director may condition the phasing to ensure each phase shall function independently. (ENGINEERING,
BUILDING, PLANNING)
20. Special
a. The revised parking plan dated July 14, 2026, reflecting an increase of 25 additional on-site parking spaces to a total of 381 onsite vehicle parking spaces, is incorporated into the project plans. The project applicant may 409
Reso. No.
revise the approved parking plan to increase the number of on-site parking spaces, provided the revisions remain in substantial conformance with the approved project and do not result in significant changes to the site layout, circulation, drainage, utilities, landscaping, or other project improvements.
b. Development impact fees can be deferred through a fee deferra l agreement in accordance with the City's adopted fee policy (adopted August 26, 2025) pursuant to Government Code Section 66007, as amended by SB 937 (2024). (PLANNING, HOUSING)
22. Landscaping Maintenance Agreement
Prior to issuance of the Certi ficate of Occupancy, the property owner shall enter into an agreement with the City of Rocklin providing for the maintenance of landscaping and irrigation within the public right -of-way along Pacific Street and Midas Avenue. The agreement shall stipulate that th e property owner shall maintain the irrigation system and all plant materials. The agreement shall also indemnify the City against claims arising from developer’s activities and shall be recorded and binding on successors in interest of the developer . (ENGINEERING, PUBLIC WORKS)
23. Tree Removal
a. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with all applicable tree protection and preservation measures identified in the Arborist Report prepared by Edwin E. Stirtz, Consulting Arborist, dated March 3, 2026.
b. Upon completion of a project and prior to a final inspection / issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the project arborist shall prepare a final list of all oak trees removed to accommodate development of the project. Prior to a final inspection / issuance of a certificate of occupancy the developer shall mitigate for all oak trees removed as a result of the project as set forth in the City of Rocklin Oak Tree Ordinance.
24. Affordability Requirement
a. The project shal l record an affordability regulatory agreement for the project, or equivalent, to the satisfaction of the City Attorney, prior to occupancy. Said contract shall include the following provisions:
i. A minimum of 278 units shall be rental units affordab le to extremely low, very low, or low-income households.
410
Reso. No.
ii. Affordable rental units, maximum incomes, and maximum rents will be restricted for a 55-year term in a recorded affordability restriction. (PLANNING, HOUSING)
25. Monitoring
Prior to recording of the first final map or any grading on the property, the subdivider shall deposit with the City of Rocklin the current fee to pay for the City’s time and material cost to administer the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
The Community Development Director sh all de termine if and when additional deposits must be paid for administering the Mitigation Monitoring Program, including additional deposits on subsequent phase final maps. These amounts shall be paid prior to recording subsequent final maps on this project. (ENGINEERING)
26. Indemnification and Duty to Defend
As a condition for project approval, Applicant or an agent of Applicant acceptable to City shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding, against the City or its agents, officers, and employees; including all costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, and liabilities incurred in the defense of such claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval by the City and its agents, officers, and employees, or other City advisory agency, appeal board, or legislative body concerning this project approval. City shall promptly notify Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense of said claim, action, or proceeding. (CITY ATTORNEY)
27. Other
a. Prior to issuance of improvement plans or a building permit, the project shall provide a document delineating and confirming that no riparian or wetland areas would be altered as part of development. (PLANNING)
b. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Lot Line Adjustment (LLA2026 - 0001) shall be recorded with the Placer County Clerk -Recorder’s Office. (PLANNING, ENGINEERING)
c. Projects shall comply with all applicable standar ds and mitigation measures in the Rocklin General Plan EIR and General Plan goals, policies, and action plans. (PLANNING)
d. The approved Parking Enforcement Plan, submitted April 3, 2026, shall establish procedures for the management and enforcement of the 411
Reso. No.
approved on -site parking spaces for the life of the project. (PLANNING,
ENGINEERING)
28. Validity
a. This entitlement shall not be considered valid and approved unless and until the concurrent Environmental (ENV2026-0008) has been approved. (PLANNING)
b. This en titlement shall expire three (3) years from the date of approval unless prior to that date a building permit has been issued or a time extension has been granted. (PLANNING)
c. Approval of this entitlement does not relieve the developer of the need to obtain subsequent permits and approvals, such as but not limited to Grading Permits, Improvement Plans, Building Permits and/or Oak Tree Removal Permits. (PLANNING)
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rocklin held on August 25, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
____________________________________
David Bass, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Avinta Singh, City Clerk
412
to Reso. No.
EXHIBIT A
Midas Apartments (DR2026-0002)
413
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
0,'$6$3$570(176
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
(17,7/(0(175(68%0,77$/
6+((7,1'(;
$5&+,7(&785(
$5&+,7(&785( &29(56+((7
$5&+,7(&785( 6,7(3/$1
$5&+,7(&785( )/2253/$16%/'*$
$5&+,7(&785( (/(9$7,216%/'*$
$5&+,7(&785( )/2253/$16%/'*%
$5&+,7(&785( )/2253/$16%/'*%
$5&+,7(&785( (/(9$7,216%/'*%
$5&+,7(&785( &2857<$5'(/(9$7,216%/'*%
$5&+,7(&785( 3(563(&7,9(6
%/'*$
$5&+,7(&785(
3(563(&7,9(6
%/'*%
$5&+,7(&785( %8,/',1*6(&7,216
$5&+,7(&785( 81,73/$16
$5&+,7(&785( 0$7(5,$/%2$5'
$5&+,7(&785( 6,7(&217(;7
&,9,/
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<(;,67,1*&21',7,216
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<'(02/,7,213/$1
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<*5$',1* '5$,1$*(
&,9,/ & &21&(378$/*5$',1* '5$,1$*(6(&7,216
&,9,/ & &21&(378$/*5$',1* '5$,1$*('(7$,/6
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<)5217$*(,03529(0(176
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<6(:(5 :$7(5
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<),5($&&(663/$1
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<(;,67,1*6+('0$3
&,9,/ & 35(/,0,1$5<'(9(/23('6+('0$3
/$1'6&$3(
/$1'6&$3( 3/ 35(/,0,1$5</$1'6&$3(3/$1
/$1'6&$3( 3/ 35(/,0,1$5</$1'6&$3(3/$1&$/&8/$7,216
/$1'6&$3( 3/ 35(/,0,1$5</$1'6&$3(3/$1'(7$,/6
/,*+7,1*
/,*+7,1* $ /,*+7,1*3+2720(75,&3/$1
EXHIBIT A
DR2026-0002
Recommended to the City Council for Approval by the Planning Commission on August 4, 2026 David Mohlenbrok
414
75$&.6
3$&,),&675((7
0,'$6$9(
352326(''5,9(:$<
352326(''5,9(:$<
%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*
$0(1,7<63$&(
6)
/$81'5<
(/(&
75$6+
75$6+
/2
$',1*
75$6+
/2$',1*
75$6+
/2$',1*
(
81'(5*5281'
9$8/7
(
32:(5
32/(
($6(0(17)73* (
&
(
32:(5/,1(
(
32:(5/,1(
(
32:(532/(
(
32:(532/(
3$7,2
3(7$5($
75$6+
/2%%<
3$&.$*(
2)),&(
7((150
6)
55 55
%5($.
50
),5( 75$6+
/2%%<
/$81'5<
/$81'5<
%,.(
2)),&(
(/(&
),5(
0(&+
),5(0(&+
%,.(67*
)7+,*+0(7$/
)(1&($5281'
3/$<*281'
%,.(
0(&+
(/(&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
& & &
& &
&
&
75$16)250(5
75$16)250(5
&
&
&
&
75$16)2
50 (5
&&&&&
&
&
&
&
&
&
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'< (95($'<
(95($'<
(95
($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
7<3($
7<3($
7<3(%
3*
(75((3/$17,1*
*
8,'(/,1($5($
5(7$,1,1*:$//6((&,9,/
02180(176,*1
6((/$1'6&$3(
+,6725,&(48,3
6((/$1'6&$3(
727/2775(//,6$%29(6((
/$1'6&$3(
/,*+732/(7<3
&
)7+,*+0(7$/)(1&(21
7232)0$6215<5(7$,1,1*
:$//6((&,9,/
6723
6723
/$1'6&$3(
)($785(6((
/$1'6&$3(
6+2577(50
%,.(3$5.,1*
6+2577(50%,.(
3$5.,1*
6+257
7(50%,.(
3$5.,1*
%28/'(566((/$1'6&$3(
/$1'6&$3()($785(
6((/$1'6&$3(
0(7$/)(1&(6((
/$1'6&$3(
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
3529,'('
3$5.,1*6800$5<
5$7,27281,76
7<3( 5(48,5('
(93$5.,1*5(48,5(0(176
&2'(5(485(0(17 3529,'('
(95($'<
(9&+$5*(56
(9&6
&$/*5((1
3(581,7
&$/*5((1
2)81$66,*1('67$//6
67$//6(95($'<
;
67$//6
127(
(95($'<
6+$//%(3529,'(':,7+95(&(37$&/(6
(9&+$5*(56
6+$//%((48,33(':,7+-25-&211(&7256
$&&(66,%/((93$5.,1*5(48,5(0(176
9$1 67$1'$5'
352*5$0
5(6,'(17,$/
352*5$0
5(6,'(17,$/
&2'(5(48,5(0(17
5(48,5(' 3529,'('
$&&(66,%/(3$5.,1*5(48,5(0(176
352*5$0 &2'(5(48,5(0(17
5(48,5(' 3529,'('
5(6,'(17,$/ &%&&2'(%
(48$/7281,76:,7+02%,/,7<)($785(6
2)727$/81,76 81,76
2)81,7$5(&7&$&02%,/,7<81,76
$1'127,1&/8'(',1&$/&8/$7,21
67$//6
%(' %(' %('
727$/
81,76
%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*
727$/%8,/',1*6800$5<
727$/
/(9(/
%8,/',1*
*5266$5($
6)
180%(52)81,77<3(6
6)
6)
%('$
%('$
81,77<3(
81,76800$5<
727$/
3(5&(17
%('%
5(17$%/(
81,76,=(
6)
6)
6)
%('$ 6)
%('% 6)
180%(52)81,76
%('$ %('$ %('$
727$/
81,76
/(9(/
/(9(/
%8,/',1* 7<3($6800$5<
727$/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
180%(52)81,77<3(6
$//81,76$5(352326('72%($))25'$%/(
727$/
81,76
/(9(/
/(9(/
%8,/',1* 7<3(%6800$5<
727$/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
180%(52)81,77<3(6
$//81,76$5(352326('72%($))25'$%/(
/(9(/21(,1&/8'(67+(6)&/8%+286(
%('%
%('%
%('$ %('$ %('$%('% %('%
*5266$5($
*5266$5($
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
127($//3$5.,1*,681$66,*1('
&%&&2'(%
72(9&6
5(48,5(' 3529,'('352*5$0 &2'(5(48,5(0(17
5(6,'(17,$/ &%&&2'(%
2)5(0$,1,1*67$//6
67$//667$//6
(967$//6
;
6)
6)
6)
2)7+(727$/81,76$5(72%(02%,/,7<81,76
; 81,76
%('$ %('$ %('$
727$/
81,76
/(9(/
/(9(/
%8,/',1* 7<3($6800$5<
727$/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
180%(52)81,77<3(6
$//81,76$5(352326('72%($))25'$%/(
%('%
%('%
*5266$5($
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
3(53* (·667$1'$5'6,7,61273(50,66,%/(72+$9((/(&75,&&+$5*,1*67$7,216 :,7+,17+(,5($6(0(17
0$;)7
=21,1*5(48,5(0(17
3529,'('
7232)3$5$3(7
723*$%/(
0((7,1*&2'(
%8,/',1*+(,*+7
)52176(7%$&.
675((76,'(
,17(5,256,'(6(7%$&.
<(6
<(6
<(6
<(6
0,1)7
0,1)7
0,1)7
0,1)75($56(7%$&.
/21*7(50
63$&(3(5':(//,1*81,76
23(163$&(
3$5.,1*
5(48,5(0(17
5(6,'(17,$/%,.(
3$5.,1*
&$/*5((1
)$5
6+2577(50
63$&(3(56)0,1
1$
<(6
<(6
:$,9(5
5(48(67('
125(48,5(0(17
125(48,5(0(17
'(16,7<
8$ <(60,18$
/27&29(5$*(
<(60$;
352-(&71$0(
352-(&7/2&$7,21
$66(662563$5&(/
/276,=(
=21,1*
*(1(5$/3/$1
2&&83$1&<86(
0,'$6$376
&251(52)3$&,),&67 0,'$6$9(52&./,1&$
$&5(6
50'253'
+,*+'(16,7<5(6,'(17,$/
+'5
508/7,)$0,/<
$))25'$%/(81,76
3$5.,1*/276+$',1*
6,7(/,*+7,1*32/(+(,*+7
3$5.,1*)227&$1'/(6
3('(675,$1:$/.:$<)227&$1'/(6
6,7(/,*+7,1*6+,(/',1*5(48,5(0(176
0,1
0$;)7
7%'
7%'
0867%('$5.6.<&203/,$17
'(*5((67$1'$5'
)7;
)73$5.,1*67$//
',0(16,216
352326('67$1'$5'
)7;)7
'(*5((&203$&7
)7;)7
'5,9($,6/(:,'7+
)7 )7 <(6)7)7)25),5($&&(66$,6/(
&203$&73(5&(17$*(
<(60$;
63$&(63(5%('678',281,7
63$&(63(5%('
&29(53$5.,1*
12&29(5('63$&(6,63$&(3(581,76+$//%(&29(5('
12*8(673$5.,1**8(67
63$&(3(52)81,76
<(66'%/
67$1'$5'
%<5,*+7
<(66'%/
67$1'$5'
%<5,*+7
<(66'%/
67$1'$5'
%<5,*+7
<(66'%/
67$1'$5'
%<5,*+7
<(6
<(6
75$,175$&.6
3$&,),&67
0,'$6$9( 6,7(
*529(67
&('$567
3,1(67
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
6,7(3/$1
5(6,'(17,$/352*5$0'$7$
=21,1*,1)250$7,21
9,&,1,7<0$3
415
67$,5
67$,5
%(' $
%(' $%(' %%(' %%(' $%(' $%(' $%(' $%(' %%(' %%(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $%(' $%(' $ (/(95220#/(9(/
75$6+
(/(&'$7$
67$,567$,5
0(&+ 75$6+
/2%%<
/$81'5<
%,.(
6725$*(
(/(&
),5(
%(' $
%(' $%(' %%(' %%(' $%(' $%(' $%(' $%(' %%(' %%(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ %(' $ &$123<$%29(
127(
*5281')/22581,76:,//+$9(%,.(
5$&.6:,7+,17+(81,7)25/21*7(50%,.(67*
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
732522) $63+$/76+,1*/(522)
522)+$7&+
0(&+81,76
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3($
/(9(/
%/'*
7<3($
/(9(/
%/'*
7<3($
522)
416
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5 %2$5' %$77(16,',1*
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 %2$5' %$77(16,',1*
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
5$,1/($'(5
&(0(173/$67(5
%2$5' %$77(16,',1*
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
5$,1/($'(5
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
%2$5' %$77(16,',1*
%/'*
7<3($
6287+(/(9
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3($
1257+(/(9
%/'*
7<3($
($67(/(9
%/'*
7<3($
:(67(/(9
417
0(&+ ),5(
(/(&
75$6+
/$81'5<
%,.(
6725$*(
7((15220
6)
/281*(6)
2)),&(
3$&.$*(
2)),&(
%5($.
5220
67$,5
67$,5
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' %
%(' %
%(' $
%(' %
%(' %
(/(&
(/(&
+285),5(:$// &$123<$%29(
&$123<$%29(
&$123<$%29(
127(
*5281')/22581,76:,//+$9(%,.(
5$&.6:,7+,17+(81,7)25/21*7(50%,.(67*
67$,5
67$,5
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' %
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $ %(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' $
%(' %
%(' %
%(' $
%(' %%(' %%(' $
%(' $
%(' %
(/(&
(/(&
+285),5(:$//
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3(%
/(9(/
%/'*
7<3(%
/(9(/
418
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
732522)
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
522)+$7&+
0(&+81,76
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3(%
522)
419
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
%2$5' %$77(16,',1* &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
%2$5' %$77(16,',1*
5$,1/($'(5 0(7$/&$123<
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
%2$5' %$77(16,',1* &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5
%2$5' %$77(16,',1*
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
30
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3(%
6287+(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
($67(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
1257+(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
:(67(/(9
420
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 /(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 /(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 0(7$/&$123<
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5
%2$5' %$77(16,',1* &(0(173/$67(5 &(0(173/$67(5 /(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
&(0(173/$67(5
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
&(0(173/$67(5
&(0(173/$67(5
5$,1/($'(5
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
30
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3(%
&2857<$5'(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
&2857<$5'(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
&2857<$5'(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
&2857<$5'(/(9
%/'*
7<3(%
&2857<$5'(/(9
421
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
30
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
3$&,),&675((73(563(&7,9(
422
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
30
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%8,/',1*%&/8%+286((175<3(563(&7,9(
423
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
6/23(6/23(
&25581,7 81,7
&25581,7 81,7
&25581,7 81,7
&25581,7 81,7
0(&+81,76
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
/(9(/
%275866
723
(/(9$725
6+$)7
/2%%< &255,'25
&255,'25
&255,'25
&255,'25
6/23(
81,7
81,7
81,7
81,7
(/(9$725
50 67*
67*
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%/'*
7<3($
6(&7,21
%/'*
7<3($
6(&7,21
424
*5266$5($
6)
*5266$5($
6)
*5266$5($
6)
*5266$5($
6)
*5266$5($
6)
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWREHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
%('$
%('$
%('%
%('$
%('%
425
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
30
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
0$7(5,$/%2$5'
%2$5' %$77(16,',1*
0$18)$&785(
-$0(6+$5',(
3$,17&2/25
,*/22 '(:
&(0(173/$67(5
0$18)$&785(
'811(':$5'6
&2/25
:+,63(5 '(:
&(0(173/$67(5
0$18)$&785(
'811(':$5'6
&2/25
*5$<3($5/ '(&
&(0(173/$67(5
0$18)$&785(
'811(':$5'6
&2/25
*5((1/$1' '(
&(0(173/$67(5
0$18)$&785(
'811(':$5'6
&2/25
6721,6+ '(
$63+$/76+,1*/(522)
0$18)$&785(
7,0%(5/,1(
&2/25
3(:7(5*5$<
'(6,*1,0$*()250(7$/3,&.(7)(1&(
$1'0$6215<5(7$,1,1*:$//$/21*
1257+3523(57</,1(
/,*+732/(
0$18)$&785(
&223(5/,*+7,1*62/87,216
1$0(
/80$5. 35(9$,/',6&5(7(/('
&2/25
%/$&.
426
75$,175$&.6
3$&
,),&
67
0,'$6$9( 6,7(
*529(67
&('$567
3,1(67
)DLU2DNV%RXOHYDUG6WXGLR
6DFUDPHQWR&DOLIRUQLD
_ZZZKUJDUFKLWHFWVFRP
1RFRSLHVWUDQVPLVVLRQUHSURGXFWLRQVRUHOHFWURQLFPDQLSXODWLRQRIDQ\SRUWLRQRIWKHVHGUDZLQJVLQZKROHRULQSDUWDUHWR EHPDGHZLWKRXWWKHH[SUHVVZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQRI+5*$$OOGHVLJQVLQGLFDWHGLQWKHVHGUDZLQJVDUHSURSHUW\RI+5*$$OOFRS\ULJKWVUHVHUYHG & ?8VHUV?PZROWHULQJ?'RFXPHQWV?B0LGDV$SWVB&HQWUDOBBPZROWHULQJ:)*=UYW
$0
0,'$6$376
0,'$6 3$&,),&6752&./,1&$
6,7(&217(;7
9,(:)5207+(&251(52)3$&,),&67 0,'$6$9( 9,(:)5203$&,),&675((7 9,(:)5200,'$6$9( 9,(:)5200,'$6$9( 6,7(&217(;70$3 427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
AMENITY SPACE
1,480 SF
LAUNDRY
ELEC
TRASH
C
PACKAGE
OFFICE
TEEN RM.
800 SF
RR RR
BREAK
RM.
FIRE TRASH
LOBBY
LAUNDRY
OFFICE
FIREMECH
BIKE STG.
BIKE
MECH
ELEC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C C
C C
C
C
C
C
CC
CCCCC
C
C
C
C
C
C
FIRE
TRASH
LOBBY LAUNDRY
BIKEMECH
ELEC
C
2:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
4:1
10:1
5:1
3:1
8:1
5:1
2:1 2:1 2:12:1 2:1 2:12:22:1: 12:1:12:1 22 1:12:1
2:12:12
:1113:1
:12
44:1
5:5555:1:11
101100
33:13:13:1
8:1
5:1:1
1 2
3 5
5 5
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 DESIGN INTENT AT PG&E ZONE:
PLANTINGS TO FOLLOW 'PG&E SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR
PLANTING NEAR POWERLINES' (SEE SHEET PL2).
MATERIAL WITHIN 20' OF OH LINES TO BE 2' MAXIMUM.
MATERIAL BETWEEN 20'-60' OF OH LINES TO BE 10' MAXIMUM.
TYPICAL.
LDING 2:G :DESIGN INTENT AT RETAINING WALL & BUILDING 2:IGGN GSIG RIIIIIIIIIIIISIISISISISISSSIGISIGGGGGGGGGGGIIGGIIGGIIGGIIGGIIGGIIGGGGGGGGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD N
F RETAINING WALL ANDR DDNDDNDNAAAAINING WALL ANAINING WALL ANAININAINING WALG WAL ANANPROVIDE VINES ON INSIDE OF RETAINRPRPPROVIDE VINES ON INSIDEPROVIDE VINES ON INSIDE OF RETAPROVIDE VINES ON INSIDE OF RETAROVIROVI E VINE VIN SO NSO N NSIDENSIDE OF REOF REE T BASE. KEEP 3-4' 'BARK ONLY' STRIPEEP 3 ' 'BA RK ONLY' STRIP3 IPS RRSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTSTTTSTKE '4444444'44 BBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAABALOW SHRUBS AT BASE. KLOW SW SHRUBS AT BASE. KS AINST BUILDINGS.SAAGAINST BUA
4 4
DESIGN INTENT AT CORNER MONUMENT:T:T:C
ALLS AND SIGNAGENNALS NNNCREATE A SENSE OF ARRIVAL WITH WALLS ANAFF
OF ROCKLIN IDENTITY ELEMENTSMMTY EAND INCORPORATE CITY OF ROC
LE, BOULDERS AND FOCAL PIECE PROVIDEDEEPRCE PROVIDELWITH COBBLE, BOULDL ROCKLIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY.RBY ROCKL
AL PL:L:PLDESIGN INTENT AT UNITED RENTAL PL:
EEN SCREEN TREES ALONGERTN PROVIDE EVERGREEN SCREE
STING SOUND WALL WHERE POSSIBLE.HWLWLLEXISTING SO
6 6
6 20
10'0101 10'11000'110000'020
12 7
21 CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE
SHRUB AREA SIZE
CISTUS X SKANBERGII / CORAL ROCKROSE (3'X6') 5 GAL.
EPILOBIUM CANUM / CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA (18"X3') 5 GAL.
GREVILLEA X `NOELLII` / NOEL GREVILLEA (4'X5') 5 GAL.
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA `MOUND SAN BRUNO` / CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY (5'X8') 5 GAL.
RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA `MINOR` / DWARF YEDDA HAWTHORNE (4'X4') 5 GAL.
CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' / LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH (3'X3') 5 GAL.
CISTUS X PURPUREUS / ORCHID ROCKROSE (4'X4') 5 GAL.
DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' / VARIEGATED FLAX LILY (4'X3') 5 GAL.
DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY (3'X3') 5 GAL.
LAURUS NOBILIS 'MONRIK' / LITTLE RAGU® SWEET BAY (5'X7') 5 GAL.
LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' / CANYON PRINCE GIANT WILD RYE (3'X3') 5 GAL.
LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA PLATINUM BEAUTY / PLATINUM BEAUTY LOMANDRA (3'X3') 5 GAL.
MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASS (4'X4') 5 GAL.
PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'MONUS' TM / BRIGHT 'N TIGHT LAUREL CHERRY (8'X6') 5 GAL.
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'PINK DANCER' / PINK DANCER INDIAN HAWTHORN (2'X4') 5 GAL.
GROUND COVER AREA
ACACIA REDOLENS 'LOW BOY' / LOW BOY PROSTRATE ACACIA (2'X8') 1 GAL.
BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'PIGEON POINT' / PIGEON POINT COYOTE BRUSH (2'X8') 1 GAL.
CEANOTHUS G. H. 'DIAMOND HEIGHTS' / DIAMOND HEIGHTS CARMEL CREEPER (12"X5') 1 GAL.
COPROSMA KIRKII 'VERDE VISTA' / VERDE VISTA CREEPING COPROSMAT (3'X6') 1 GAL.
COTONEASTER DAMMERI 'LOWFAST' / LOWFAST BEARBERRY COTONEASTER (8"X6') 1 GAL.
LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS / PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA (2'X4') 1 GAL.
TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS PROSTRATUM / GERMANDER (6"X3') 1 GAL.
DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'DTN03' / BABY BLISS FLAX LILY (12"X12") 1 GAL.
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM `WHITE` / WHITE TRAILING MYOPORUM (6"X6') 1 GAL.
NEPETA X FAASSENII 'LIMELIGHT' / LIMELIGHT CATMINT (8"X2') 1 GAL.
WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA `MUNDI' / LOW COAST ROSEMARY (18"X5') 1 GAL.
TURF
TURF SOD - 90/10 TALL FESCUE / FESCUE BLEND --
SPMUD EASEMENT
CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' / LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL.
CISTUS LADANIFER / CRIMSON SPOT ROCKROSE 5 GAL.
RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR' / DWARF YEDDA HAWTHORN 5 GAL.
TURF SOD - CALIFORNIA NATIVE MOW FREE / DROUGHT TOLERANT FESCUE BLEND -- BY DELTA BLUEGRASS CO.
STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR APPROVE AGGREGATE --
6" - 12" COBBLE --
TOTAL SITE AREA: 308,840 SF
TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 72,485 SF (23%)
TREE SCHEDULE
SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE QTY.
ACER RUBRUM `REDPOINTE`
REDPOINTE MAPLE (40'X20') 15 GAL. MOD1 6
ACER RUBRUM 'OCTOBER GLORY'
OCTOBER GLORY RED MAPLE (40'X35') 15 GAL. MOD1 8
CHIONANTHUS RETUSUS
CHINESE FRINGE TREE (20'X15') 15 GAL. MOD 2
COTINUS COGGYGRIA 'ROYAL PURPLE'
ROYAL PURPLE SMOKE TREE (15'X15') 15 GAL. LOW 3
PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR
FERN PINE (40'X20') 15 GAL. MOD 12
QUERCUS PHELLOS
WILLOW OAK (50'X40') 60" BOX LOW 1
TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`
GREENSPIRE LINDEN (40'X25') 15 GAL. MOD 5
ULMUS PARVIFOLIA `DRAKE`
DRAKE LACEBARK ELM (50'X35') 15 GAL. MOD 17
LARGE SHRUB SCHEDULE: AT PG&E EASEMENT ONLY
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY'
MAJESTIC BEAUTY INDIAN HAWTHORN
(10' HIGH & 10' WIDE - TRIMMED TO TREE STD.)
15 GAL. MOD 50
REFERENCE NOTES
CODE DESCRIPTION
EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN. VERIFY IN FIELD.
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO REMAIN. VERIFY
IN FIELD.
EXISTING PG&E OVERHEAD POWERLINE "NO TREE
PLANTING" ZONE.
EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. VERIFY IN
FIELD.
PROPOSED TRANSFORMER. SEE CIVIL PLANS.
PROPOSED LADDER PADS. SEE FIRE ACCESS PLAN.
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL WITH OPEN METAL FENCE.
SEE CIVIL PLANS.
PROPOSED 42" HIGH OPEN METAL FENCE.
PROPOSED CORNER MONUMENT SIGN WALL WITH
MOUNDED PLANTING.
PROPOSED 24" RAISED PLANTER WITH CENTER
CONCRETE PAD FOR "FOCAL POINT" EQUIPMENT FROM
THE ROCKLIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY. EQUIPMENT TBD.
PROPOSED SPECIMEN OAK TREE.
PROPOSED COBBLE AND BOULDERS. BOULDERS TO BE
SALVAGED AND RETAINED ON SITE DURING
CONSTRUCTION.
PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO WITH ROUND PICNIC
TABLES (BY OWNER).
PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO WITH RECTANGULAR
PICNIC TABLES (BY OWNER).
PROPOSED PERGOLA SHADE STRUCTURE (BY OWNER).
PROPOSED 2-12 PLAY AREA WITH ENGINEERED FIBAR.
PROPOSED OPEN TURF AREA.
PROPOSED PET RELIEF AREA WITH TURF AND
CONCRETE WALK.
PROPOSED BENCH WITH ADJACENT ADA PAD.
PROPOSED STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE OR
APPROVED AGGREGATE AT SPMUD SEWER EASEMENT.
PROPOSED BIKE RACKS (TYPICAL OF 14).
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE DESIGN NOTES
1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED USING AN AUTOMATIC
IRRIGATION SYSTEM THAT WILL BE COMPLIANT WITH THE STATE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE.
2. ALL ON-SITE TREES TO BE REMOVED. SEE CIVIL PLANS AND ARBORIST REPORT.
3. TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS, INCLUDING WELLS, ISLANDS, PARKWAYS, MEDIANS, ETC. SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE UNCOMPACTED SOIL AREA AMENABLE TO ROOT GROWTH. THE DEPTH OF SUITABLE SOIL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24" AND A MAXIMUM OF 36" UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.
4. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF BARK MULCH TOP DRESSING.
5. GROUND COVERS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN A 4' RADIUS OF A TREE TRUNK.
6. SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED SO AS NOT TO BLOCK FIRST-STORY WINDOWS.
7. SHRUBS & TREES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH LADDER PAD LOCATIONS.
8. SCREEN PLANTING TO BE PROVIDED ALONG RAILROAD PROPERTY LINE.
9. ALL GROUND MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED USING EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL.
10. FINAL TREE PLACEMENTS TO BE CONFIRMED SO AS NOT TO BLOCK BUILDING ADDRESSES.
11. OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM.
1. PLANTINGS ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A DENSITY THAT ACHIEVES FULL AND CONTINUOUS COVERAGE AT MATURITY.
2. SHRUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO SCREEN VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS FROM PARKING SPACES THAT FACE THE PUBLIC RIGHT_OF_WAY OR FIRST_STORY WINDOWS.
3. PLANT NAME TAGS ARE NOT TO BE REMOVED UNTIL AFTER INSPECTION BY CITY STAFF.
4. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO CITY STAFF:
- THIRD PARTY MWELO IRRIGATION AUDIT INCLUDING:
- CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
- CERTIFICATION OF INSTALLATION
- IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
- MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
- SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT
PG&E TREE PLANTINGPGG&&E
TR
P
PPGGG&&&EETTTRREEEPPLA
PGGG&&&&EETTTRRREEEEEPPPLLLALAAANNTTNN
ALLPPPEEEEERTRTRTTTEEE&&&G&GGPGPP
LANTINGLANTTINNNGGGG
GUIDELINE AREAGUUUUIDDDDEEELLLLIINNNNNEEEAAAARRREREEAAEA
GUIDEGGUUI
G 2
222
BLDG 2BBBLBLBBBB
DD
22 BLDLDTYPE AYPE APP
AAA
PE EPEPPPP
AAAAAAA
YPTYYYPYPYPP
TYTYTYTYYY
G 3
3 BLDG 3LBLBL
G3G3
LLBLBLDBLBLBBLBLLBBLBL
GGG3GG3
TYPE A
EPEAEAAAAAAAAAAAAA
P
TYP
PPPPYPTTYPTTTTYTTTTTTT
G 1
111111111111
BLDG 1
DG
BBBBBBBB
11111
BLDLDBLBBL
G
BLDLDBLLDBLDTYPE B
E
TYYYY
BB
TTTTTTTTT
BBBBBBB
PEPPYPPPYYTYTTTTT
G 1
1 BLDG 1
G1GGDGDGDDGGDDGLDDDDDLLLLLLLLLLLBBBBBB
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
BLBLDGBLDGB
GGGGG
11111111
TYPE B
PYPYTTYTYYYTTTYPYPYPYPYPYPP
TTYPTYTTY
EEE BBBBE B
TYTYYYTTYTYYTTTYTTTTTTYYTYTTYTY
MAY 11, 2026
NWC PACIFIC STREET & MIDAS AVE
ROCKLIN CA 9577
TSD ENGINEERING, INC.
785 Orchard Drive, Suite #110
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 608-0707
Fax: (916) 608-0701
expect more.Proposed
By:
CYPRESS EQUITY INVESTMENTS
12121 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 801
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
In Association
With:
ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
WATERFORD PROPERTY COMPANY
100 BAYVIEW CIRCLE, SUITE 4500
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 95660
PACIFIC STREET
RAILROAD TRACKS
MIDAS AVE.
PL1
0 40' 80'
Scale: 1" = 40'-0"
CITY OF ROCKLIN NOTES
438
TOTAL PAVED AREA: 48,398 S.F.
NOTE: DOES NOT INCLUDE PG&E TREE/PLANTING CLEARANCE AREA TOTAL SHADE REQUIRED (50%): 24,199 S.F.
TOTAL SHADE PROVIDED (69.7)%: 33756 S.F.
DIA. QTY. S.F. TOTAL S.F.
30 - 35' TREES
(ACER, ULMUS)
100% 29 962 27,898
75% 0 722 0
50% 2 481 962
25% 4 240 960
25 - 30' TREES
(TILIA)
100% 0 706 0
75% 0 530 0
50% 0 354 0
25% 0 177 0
20 - 25' TREES
(ACER, PODOCARPUS)
100% 0 491 0
75% 0 368 0
50% 16 246 3,936
25% 0 123 0
TOTAL SHADE PROVIDED BY TREES: 33,756 S.F.
NOTE: SHADE VALUES ARE MEASURED WHEN SUN IS
DIRECTLY OVERHEAD AND WHEN TREE IS AT 15-YEAR
MATURITY.
SHADE CALCULATIONS
AMENITY SPACE
1,480 SF
LAUNDRY
ELEC
TRASH
C
PACKAGE
OFFICE
TEEN RM.
800 SF
RR RR
BREAK
RM.
FIRE TRASH
LOBBY
LAUNDRY
OFFICE
FIREMECH
BIKE STG.
BIKE
MECH
ELEC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C C
C C
C
C
C
C
CC
CCCCC
C
C
C
C
C
C
FIRE
TRASH
LOBBY LAUNDRY
BIKEMECH
ELEC
C
2:1
3:1
2:1
2:1
4:1
10:1
5:1
3:1
8:1
5:1
2:1 2:1 2:12:1 2:1 2:1
Q
F
F
F
F
F F
F
H
F
F
F
F
F
F
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F F F
FF
F
H
H
H
H
Q
Q
F
H
H
Q
10'0101 10'
Q
G 2
222
BLDG 2BBBLBLBBBB
DD
22 BLDLDTYPE AYPE APP
AAA
PE EPEPPPP
AAAAAAA
YPTYYYPYPYPP
TYTYTYTYYY
G 3
3 BLDG 3LBLBL
G3G3
LLBLBLDBLBLBBLBLLBBLBL
GGG3GG3
TYPE A
EPEAEAAAAAAAAAAAA
P
TYP
PPPPYPTTYPTTTTYTTTTTTT
G 1
111111111111
BLDG 1
DG
BBBBBBBB
111111
BLDLDBLLBL
G
BLDLDBLLDBLDTYPE BTYYYY
BB
TTTTTTTTT
BBBBBBB
PPPYPPPYYTYTTTTT
G 1
1 BLDG 1
G1GGDGDGDDGGDDGLDDDDDLLLLLLLLLLLBBBBBB
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
BLBLDGBLDGB
GGGGG
11111111
TYPE B
PYPYTTYTYYYTTTYPYPYPYPYPYPP
TTYPTYTTY
EEE BBBBE B
TYTYYYTTYTYYTTTYTTTTTTYYTYTTYTY
MAY 11, 2026
NWC PACIFIC STREET & MIDAS AVE
ROCKLIN CA 9577
TSD ENGINEERING, INC.
785 Orchard Drive, Suite #110
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 608-0707
Fax: (916) 608-0701
expect more.Proposed
By:
CYPRESS EQUITY INVESTMENTS
12121 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 801
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
In Association
With:
ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
WATERFORD PROPERTY COMPANY
100 BAYVIEW CIRCLE, SUITE 4500
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 95660
PACIFIC STREET
RAILROAD TRACKS
MIDAS AVE.
PL2
0 40' 80'
Scale: 1" = 40'-0"
DESIGN INTENT AT PG&E ZONE:
PLANTINGS TO FOLLOW 'PG&E SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR
PLANTING NEAR POWERLINES' (SEE THIS SHEET).
MATERIAL WITHIN 20' OF OH LINES TO BE 2' MAXIMUM.
MATERIAL BETWEEN 20'-60' OF OH LINES TO BE 10' MAXIMUM.
TYPICAL.
PG&E TREE PLANTING GUIDELINE AREAPPPGPGG&&&&EEETTTTRRREEEEEEPPPLLAAANNNTTINNGGGGUU DELINE
AR
ETTTTRRREEEEPPPLLAAANNTTTIINNNGGGGGUUUIIDDDEEELLLINNNEEEAAARR T
EP
ANTINNGGGUUIDDEELINE
ARRRAAAEAEAENENENLINLINLELELEDEDEDIDIDUIUUUGGGGGGNGNGNININTITTNTNNAAALAPLPLPPPEEEERERERTRTRTTTE
IDELINE AREA
REEEAAA
DE
LLNNEEAAAARRREEAAAAAAEAEAERERE
(AREA NOT INCLU((AREA
ANNOT I
N
(A(AAARAARRREEEEAAANANNOOOOTT
NCL
(AREA NOT INCLUDED IN SHADE CALC)
CC)C))
NCLUD
DE
DI NS
SHHADE
CCALC)
ANOTTINNCCCLLUUUUUDDDDEEDEDDDINNNN
SSSHHHAHAAADADDEDEECCCCAAAALLLCCLCC)C))
20'020
20'200
60'600000060
60'600
439
MAY 11, 2026
NWC PACIFIC STREET & MIDAS AVE
ROCKLIN CA 9577
TSD ENGINEERING, INC.
785 Orchard Drive, Suite #110
Folsom, CA 95630
Phone: (916) 608-0707
Fax: (916) 608-0701
expect more.Proposed
By:
CYPRESS EQUITY INVESTMENTS
12121 WILSHIRE BLVD, SUITE 801
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
In Association
With:
ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
WATERFORD PROPERTY COMPANY
100 BAYVIEW CIRCLE, SUITE 4500
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 95660
PL3
8'-0" O.C. MAX.
1 2
3 4
TUBULAR METAL FENCE
1/2" = 1'-0"
WELDED PANEL.1
2" SQ. RAILS - 14 GA.2
3" SQ. POST - 14 GA. WITH
CAP. PLACE POSTS 8" O.C.
MAXIMUM.
3 1" SQ. PICKET - 14 GA.4
5 6
7 FINISH:
POWDERCOATED BLACK.
NOTE:
FOR FENCING ON RETAINING
WALLS, SEE CIVIL PLAN.
HEIGHT
VARIES
SEE PLAN
3-15/16"
MAX
6 4" AGGREGATE BASE,
COMPACTED.
7 COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO
90% REL. DENSITY.
5 CONCRETE FOOTING;
16" DIAMETER PIER WITH
EMBEDDED POST.
MIN F'c = 2,500 PSI. SLOPE TOP
AWAY FROM POST TO PREVENT
STANDING WATER.
3-15/16"
MAX
3"
CLR.
3'-9"
MIN
R-25054-29B
C BENCH
N.T.S. D TRASH RECEPTACLE
N.T.S.
CORNER MONUMENT
3/16" = 1'-0"
Midas Apartments
25'16'
2'
3'-6"
42" HIGH SIGN WALL, RETAINING, W/STONE
VENEER.
1 24" HIGH RAISED PLANTER W/STONE VENEER.2
FOCAL PIECE FROM ROCKLIN HISTORICAL
SOCIETY. SIZE AND SHAPE TBD.
3 SPECIMEN OAK TREE (60" BOX).4
GRANITE BOULDERS - VARIOUS SIZES.5
1 2
3 4
5 R-25054-03A
440
'DWH &RPPHQWV
5HYLVLRQV
'DWH
3DJHRI
$OOYDOXHVVKRZQDUHPDLQWDLQHGKRUL]RQWDO)RRWFDQGOHVDWJUDGHOHYHO 7KHOLJKWLQJFDOFXODWLRQVSURYLGHGLQWKLVUHSRUWDSSUR[LPDWHWKHOLJKWOHYHOVH[SHFWHG ZLWKLQWKHVSDFHDVGHILQHGDQGDUHEDVHGRQWKHLQIRUPDWLRQSURYLGHGWR&DO/LJKWLQJ 3OHDVHYHULI\WKHGDWDWRDVVXUHWKHDFFXUDF\RIWKHUHSRUW&DO/LJKWLQJLVQRWUHVSRQVLEOH IRUOLJKWRXWSXWRIODPSVDQGEDOODVWVRUGHVLJQYDULDEOHV )LOHQDPH
0,'$6$3$570(176B,17(5,25B$5UHY$*,
&$/$
$SSOLFDWLRQ'HVLJQHU
$5
6FDOH
,1
)7
6DOHVSHUVRQ
&\QWKLD8ELOOX]
0,'$6$3$570(176
(;7(5,253+2720(75,&3/$1
/XPLQDLUH6FKHGXOH
6\PERO
&DOFXODWLRQ6XPPDU\
/DEHO &DOF7\SH 8QLWV $YJ 0D[
6\PERO,VR 4W\ /DEHO >0$18)$&@
0LQ $YJ0LQ 0D[0LQ
3(5,0(7(5B$7)/225 ,OOXPLQDQFH
'HVFULSWLRQ 0RXQWLQJ
+HLJKW
//) //' /'' %) /XPLQDLUH
)F
/XPHQV
/XPLQDLUH
:DWWV
$UUDQJHPHQW
:DWWV
$UUDQJHPHQW
/XPLQDLUH
/XPHQV
%8*5DWLQJ 0D[
8*5
1$ 1$
1257+3$5.,1*/27B$7)/225 ,OOXPLQDQFH )F ($673$5.,1*/27B$7)/225 ,OOXPLQDQFH )F
:(673$5.,1*/27B$7)/225 ,OOXPLQDQFH )F 6287+3$5.,1*/27B$7)/225 ,OOXPLQDQFH )F
3$ &223(5/,*+7,1*62/87,216/80$5.
)250(5/<($721
3593$$87:
%8*
3% &223(5/,*+7,1*62/87,216/80$5.
)250(5/<($721
3593$$87:+66
%8*
3 &223(5/,*+7,1*62/87,216/80$5.
)250(5/<($721
3593$$8:4
%8*
3+2720(75,&3/$19,(:
6FDOH
LQFK )W
75$&.6
3$&,),&675((7
0,'$6$9(
727/27
3/$<*5281'
6)
352326(''5,9(:$<
352326(''5,9(:$<
%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*
%8,/',1*
$0(1,7<63$&(
6)
/$81'5<
(/(&
75$6+
75$6+
/2
$',1*
75$6+
/2$',1*
75$6+
/2$',1*
($6(0(17
)76(:(5
($6(0
(17
)7'
5$,1$*
(
6(:(5($6(0(17
(
81'(5*5281'
9$8/7
(
32:(5
32/(
($6(0(17)73* (
&
(
32:(5/,1(
(
32:(5/,1(
(
32:(532/(
(
32:(532/(
3$7,2
287'225
63$&(
75$6+
/2%%<
3$&.$*(
2)),&(
7((150
6)
55 55
%5($.
50
),5( 75$6+
/2%%<
/$81'5<
/$81'5<
%,.(
2)),&(
(/(&
),5(
0(&+
)7+,*
+0
(7$/)(1&(
0(&+ ),5(
%,.(67*
)7+,*+0(7$/
)(1&($5281'
3/$<*281'
%,.(
0(&+
(/(&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&
&&&
&&
&
&
75$16)250(5
75$16)250(5
&
&
&
&
75 $16)2
50 (5
&& & &&
&
&
&
&
&
&
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'< (95($'<
(95($'< (95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(95($'<
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
(9&6
7<3($
7<3($
7<3(%
3* (75((3/$17,1*
&/($5$1&($5($
3
0+
3
0+
0+
3
3
0+
3
0+
3
0+
3$
0+
0+
3$
3$
0+
0+
3$
0+
3$
3$
0+
3$
0+
3$
0+
3$
0+
3$
0+
3$
0+
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
0+
3%
3%
0+
3%
0+
3%
0+
0+
3%3%
0+
3%
0+
0+
3%
3%
0+
0+
3% 3%
0+
0+
3%
441
EXHIBIT B
DR2026-0002
Recommended to the City Council for Approval by the Planning Commission on August 4, 2026David Mohlenbrok
442
City Council
Staff Report
Subject:
Northwest Rocklin Community Parks Master Plan
Date:
August 25, 2026
Submitted By:
Laurie York, Administrative Analyst
Veronica Tracy, Parks and Recreation Director
Department:
Parks and Recreation
Recommendation:
Receive a Presentation of the Draft Master Plan for the Northwest Rocklin Community Parks and Provide Direction to Staff.
Background:
Kathy Lund Park, Margaret Azevedo Park, and Whitney Park, collectively referred to as the Northwest Rocklin Community Parks (NRCP) offer a variety of amenities for Rocklin residents.
These three parks are some of the largest parks in the City. As upgrades are needed and requests from the community are made, staff need to balance the support of current amenities with proposed upgrades. Chief among these requests are upgrades and expansion of the softball and soccer fields at the parks. As enrollment in youth sports continues to grow, these spaces have quickly become overwhelmed with conflicting uses and cannot address the growing needs of youth sports teams. Whitney Park also features 17 acres of land which includes the new bicycle pump track but is otherwise largely undeveloped. Youth sports organizations have made requests for more ball fields, and staff identified a need to create a cohesive process that plans out the growth and development of all three parks.
On April 22, 2025, the City Council approved a contract with Melton Design Group (MDG) for the creation of a Northwest Rocklin Community Parks Master Plan (Resolution No. 2025-071).
The purpose of the master planning process was to evaluate the current need for the parks, anticipate future needs, and propose updates to the parks that maximize the space and usage of the facilities. Over the last fifteen months, staff has worked with MDG to complete the proposed master plan design. The process included the following steps:
Project Coordination
Site Analysis and Utility Study
Needs Assessment, Stakeholder Outreach and Program Development NRCP Visioning and Master Plan Inspiration
Development, Operations and Maintenance Costs
Final Phased Implementation Plan
Item Number D1.
443
Part of this process included holding a series of community and stakeholder meetings to present initial master plan concepts and gather feedback and input, as follows:
September 15, 2025 – in person community meeting at the Rocklin Event Center November 19, 2025 – virtual meeting with MOU groups
November 20, 2025 – virtual community meeting about Kathy Lund Park December 3, 2025 – virtual community meeting about Margaret Azevedo Park December 4, 2025 – virtual community meeting about Whitney Park April 13, 2026 – in person community meeting at the Rocklin Event Center
On August 12, 2026, MDG presented the conceptual NRCP Master Plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The staff report from that meeting is included as Attachment 1. No action was taken by the Commission; however, they provided comments and general support for the proposed master plan.
Based on all feedback received, MDG will present the proposed NRCP Master Plan at the August 25, 2026, City Council meeting. Following the presentation, staff recommends the City Council provide direction based on MDG’s findings and recommendations.
Fiscal Impact:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the staff recommendation. Any direction received by the City Council that may include additional costs will be brought back to the City Council at future meetings for formal approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Parks and Recreation Commission Staff Report
444
Parks and Recreation
Commission
Staff Report
Subject:
Northwest Rocklin Community Parks Proposed Master Plan
Date:
August 12, 2026
Submitted By:
Veronica Tracy, Parks and Recreation Director
Department:
Parks and Recreation
Recommendation:
No Action Needed, Informational Only
Background:
Kathy Lund Park, Margaret Azevedo Park, and Whitney Park, collectively referred to as the Northwest Rocklin Community Parks (NRCP) offer a variety of amenities for Rocklin residents.
These three parks are some of the largest parks in the City. As upgrades are needed and requests from the community are made, staff needs to balance the support of current amenities with proposed upgrades.
In April of 2025, Melton Design Group (MDG) was awarded the contract to develop the NRCP master plan. In the 15 months since, MDG held a series of community meetings (both in person and virtually) to give the community an opportunity to view and provide input on the proposed plans.
Following these meetings, staff and MDG worked to update the master plan concepts based on feedback from the public and City staff.
MDG will present their proposed concepts of the NRCP Master Plan to the Parks and Recreation Commission. These concepts are attached (1).
Following this meeting, MDG will compile feedback received and work with City staff to prepare a master plan concept to be presented to City Council on August 25, 2026.
Item Number 2.A.
445