Rolling Hills City Council
June 23, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS

5. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
This is the appropriate time for the Mayor or Councilmembers to approve the agenda as is or reorder.

6. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL)
Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding items not listed on this agenda.

Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will take place on any items not on the agenda.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR
Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any Councilmember may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Councilmembers for discussion.

8.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
AGENDA
Regular City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 23, 2025

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
7:00 PM
The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The City Council meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website.

Both the agenda and the live-streamed video can be found here:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Members of the public may submit written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at [email protected].

Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.

Recordings to City Council meetings can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Next Resolution No. 1395 Next Ordinance No. 388
1 RECOMMENDATION: Approve.

8.B. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER

READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
RECOMMENDATION: Approve.

8.C. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 2025: CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.D. PAYMENT OF BILLS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1392 APPROVING THE UPDATED FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC

EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) STATUTORY AND

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND

PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

9. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS

10. COMMISSION ITEMS

10.A. ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND FINDING

THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, FOR THE LOCATION AT 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (YOU & WANG) (LOT 6-SK)
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file.

CL_AGN_250623_CC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf
CL_MIN_250609_CC_F.pdf
CL_AGN_250623_CC_PaymentOfBills_E.pdf
Attachment 1 ResolutionNo1392_FY25-26_SalarySchedule_F_A.pdf Attachment 2 Circular_Letter_200-003-2 CalPERS.pdf
Attachment_3_HR_Revised_Salary_Survey_Ad_Hoc.pdf
Attachment 1: PL_ADR_250514_16CaballerosRd_RadiusMap_PCMeeting.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_250513_16CaballerosRD_ZC24-154_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment 3: PL_ADR_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154_Photos of Site.pdf Attachment 4: PL_ADR_250525_16Caballeros_Aerial View of Site_GIS.pdf Attachment 5: 250514_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-Summary of Project Table.pdf Attachment 6: 250618_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-Summary of Project Table_CC.pdf Attachment 7: CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon_Affidavit.pdf Attachment 8: Email from JuliAvedissian_14 CaballerosRd Attachment 9:PL_ADR_250515_16CaballerosRoad_ZC24-
2 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

12. OLD BUSINESS

12.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A PRESENTATION REGARDING CALOES/FEMA BUYOUT

PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.

12.B. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF

THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE

PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

13. NEW BUSINESS

13.A. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO FIDELITY BUILDERS, INC. FOR PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ON THE TENNIS COURT ADA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TOEXCEED $783,506.25, AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

AGREEMENT, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM

THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECOMMENDATION: Approved as presented

14. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL

15. MATTERS FROM STAFF

15.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS UPDATE
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.

16. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

16.A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON

ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL 154_ArchitecturalPlans_4thSubmittal.pdf
250618_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-GradingPlans.pdf
Attachment A CL_AGN_241125_CC_Item15B.pdf
Attachment B CL_AGN_241210_CC_Item4B.pdf
Attachment C FEMA-4856-DR-CA Major Disaster.pdf
Attachment D Cal OES DR-4856 HMGP NOFO.pdf
Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A.pdf
Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A_Change-ProRedline.pdf Attachment 03 - CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item11A.pdf
Attachment 01 - CL_BID_250527_TC_ADA_FIdelityBuilders.pdf Attachment 02 - CL_BID_250623_2025-03_TC_ADA_Project_BidBreakdownForm_F_A.pdf Attachment 03 - CA_AGR_250623_FidelityBuildersInc_TC-ADA_2025-03_D.pdf 3 PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES) A.

NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953 B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C.

NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO.

C.24-10-009
RECOMMENDATION: None.

16.B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A

CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE)RECOMMENDATION: NONE
RECOMMENDATION: None.

16.C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION A

CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (D)(2) AND (E)(3) BASED ON EXISTING FACTS AND

CIRCUMSTANCES THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY (1 CASE)
RECOMMENDATION: None.

17. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

18. ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Monday, July 14, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274.

Notice:

Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.

Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. 4 Agenda Item No.: 8.A
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO

CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve.

ATTACHMENTS:

CL_AGN_250623_CC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf
5 Administrative Report

8.A., File # 2839 Meeting Date: 6/23/2025
To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
From: Christian Horvath, City Clerk
TITLE

APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below.

Legislative Body City Council
Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda
Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window
City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/city_council/city_council_archive_agendas/index.php Meeting Date & Time JUNE 23, 2025 7:00pm Open Session
As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below.

Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Date: June 20, 2025
6 Agenda Item No.: 8.B
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO

CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER

READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve.

ATTACHMENTS:
7 Agenda Item No.: 8.C
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO

CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF JUNE 9 , 2025: CITY

COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

CL_MIN_250609_CC_F.pdf
8 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 9, 2025

Minutes
Rolling Hills City Council
Monday, June 9, 2025
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m.

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Pieper presiding.

2. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper Councilmembers Absent: Black
Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Samantha Crew, Management Analyst
Robert Samario, Finance Operations Lead Consultant
Norma Tabares, Assistant City Attorney

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Wilson

4. PRESENTATIONS / PROCLAMATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Pieper announced that the City Council would be adjourning the meeting in memory of Dr. Arvel B.

Witte a longtime resident.

5. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to move Excluded Consent Calendar Items after Public Hearings. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black

6. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) – NONE

7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comment: Judith Haenel

8. CONSENT CALENDAR

8.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 9, 2025

8.B. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA

8.C. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF MAY 28, 2025: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 9 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 9, 2025

8.D. PAYMENT OF BILLS

8.E. APPROVE EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MCGOWAN CONSULTING LLC. FOR SERVICES RELATING TO STORMWATER MANDATE

COMPLIANCE

8.F. APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JTL CONSULTANTS FOR A THREE-YEAR PERIOD AT A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $5,000 PER FISCAL YEAR

PROVIDING ON-CALL ARBORIST SERVICES TO SUPPORT STAFF IN FIRE FUEL

ABATEMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT CASES

8.G. APPROVE A FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

LSL, LLC TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES FOR THE THREE FISCAL YEARS STARTING WITH FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $114,900

8.H. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM DIERINGER

8.I. PULLED BY MAYOR PRO TEM DIERINGER

8.J. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION: ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 387

DESIGNATING FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,

CALIFORNIA BASED ON MAPS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND AMENDING TITLE 15 (BUILDINGS AND

CONSTRUCTION) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA
Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to approve the Consent Calendar except for Item 8H and 8I. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black
Mayor Pieper moved to Public Hearings.

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS

11.A. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING POTENTIAL INCREASE TO REFUSE RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario Public Comment: Judith Haenel
Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve Resolution No. 1394.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black
10 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 9, 2025

11.B. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 1390 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS BUDGET INCLUDING THE GENERAL FUND; REFUSE COLLECTION FUND; TRANSIT FUND - MEASURE R; TRANSIT FUND - MEASURE M; TRANSIT FUND - PROPOSITION A; TRANSIT FUND - PROPOSITION C; COPS FUND; MEASURE W FUND; AND RESOLUTION NO. 1391 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 APPROPRIATIONS GANN LIMIT FOR

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to approve as presented. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black
Mayor Pieper moved to Excluded Consent Calendar Items.

9. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS

8.H. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1392 APPROVING THE UPDATED FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY

SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPENSATION

EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, seconded by Mayor Pieper to approve the recommended salary levels for all positions with the exception of the Administrative Assistant changing to a minimum monthly salary level of $4,121 and Management Analyst to a minimum monthly salary level of $5,851. Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: Mirsch
ABSENT: Black

8.I. FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPTION: ADOPT BY TITLE ONLY ORDINANCE NO. 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC

RESOURCES CODE
Public Comment: Jim Aichele, Judith Haenel
Motion by Mayor Pieper, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to change the maximum height from finished floor to roof peak on homes, barns and stables to 21 feet with all else within that limit and direct staff to remove any potentially ambiguous language. Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Mayor Pieper
NOES: Dieringer
ABSENT: Black

10. COMMISSION ITEMS – NONE
11 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 9, 2025

12. OLD BUSINESS – NONE

13. NEW BUSINESS

13.A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1393 MEMORIALIZING THE 2024 UTILITIES DE-ENERGIZATION

DUE TO HISTORICAL LAND MOVEMENT WITHIN ROLLING HILLS AND SUBSEQUENT

ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AND UTILITY PARTNERS Presentation by City Manager Bañales
Public Comment: Melissa McNabb
Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to not approve Resolution No. 1392.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black
Mayor Pieper called for a two-minute recess at 8:28 p.m.

Mayor Pieper resumed the meeting at 8:30 p.m.

14. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL

14.A. CONSIDERATION OF SENDING A LETTER IN OPPOSITION REGARDING SB 79 (WIENER) TO

CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLYMEMBER MURATSUCHI (MIRSCH)
Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to authorizing the Mayor to sign the letter, but send separate versions to Senator Wiener, Senator Allen and Assemblymember Muratsuchi.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black
Councilmember Mirsch requested that staff research and provide any information specific to a public comment letter from the May 28, 2025 meeting and ask Cal Water if a representative would attend.

Councilmember Wilson requested that if a member is absent at a meeting where a Blue Folder Supplemental Item is added, that it be provided to the absent member in their next agenda packet.

15. MATTERS FROM STAFF

15.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A VERBAL UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER

AUDIO/VISUAL SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
12 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 9, 2025

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black

16. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION – 8:50 P.M.

16.A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL,

THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES)
A. NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953
B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10- 009

16.B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT

DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE

16.C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE

17. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – 9:24 P.M.

18. ADJOURNMENT: 9:24 P.M.

The meeting was adjourned at 9:24 p.m. on June 9, 2025 in memory of Dr. Arvel B. Witte, a longtime resident.

The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held on Monday, June 9, 2025 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via City’s website link at: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Jeff Pieper, Mayor
13 Agenda Item No.: 8.D
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO

CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: PAYMENT OF BILLS
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

CL_AGN_250623_CC_PaymentOfBills_E.pdf
14 15
16 Agenda Item No.: 8.E
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1392 APPROVING THE UPDATED FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS)

STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR

COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY

SCHEDULES
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

At the June 9 City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Bea Dieringer requested that the minimum salary ranges for two classifications listed on the salary schedule be adjusted to align with the methodology used for other classifications, excluding the Planning Manager and Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician.

This methodology applies a 10% reduction to both the minimum and maximum steps of the median salary for all surveyed cities in each classification (Attachment 3). Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer requested that the minimum salary ranges for these two classifications reflect the already applied 10% reduction, as presented on the salary schedules of comparable cities.

The two classifications presented on June 9 are as follows:

Classification Minimum Maximum
Management Analyst $6,449 $8,341
Administrative Assistant $4,373 $5,795
The adjusted salary ranges, reflecting the 10% reduction as shown (on the next page) on the salary schedules of comparable cities, are:
17 Classification Minimum Maximum
Management Analyst $5,851 $8,341
Administrative Assistant $4,121 $5,795
The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) requires the City Council to regularly adopt a master salary schedule listing pay rates and ranges for all city-established positions, including the City Manager. CalPERS Circular Letter 200-00320 (Attachment 2) mandates that public agencies maintain and publish comprehensive salary schedules for all positions. This requirement is essential to maintain the integrity of the pension system, ensure fair and equitable compensation, and foster public trust in the management of public funds.

This evening, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution (Attachment 1), which establishes the City’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (FY25-26) Salary and Hourly Compensation Schedule for the City’s classifications, including the adjustments requested by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Rolling Hills has not previously adopted a master salary schedule by resolution to formally reflect current pay ranges. To address this, the attached resolution establishes the City’s Salary and Hourly Compensation Schedule for all employees in City service. It is important to note that the salary schedule presented this evening was previously reviewed and approved by the City Council at its regular meeting on May 28, 2025. It was approved once more at the June 9, 2025 City Council meeting with a request to return with a lowered minimum monthly salary range for both the Management Analyst and Administrative Assistant positions.

Exhibit A of Resolution No. 1392 includes the revised salary schedule table per action of the City Council on June 9, 2025 which outlines full-time classifications, authorized positions, and the corresponding minimum and maximum monthly salary ranges.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution to formalize the employee salary schedule and ensure compliance with CalPERS Circular Letter 200-003-20.

The resolution also requires the regular updating and public posting of the salary schedule.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact is included in the FY25-26 Budget.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 ResolutionNo1392_FY25-26_SalarySchedule_F_A.pdf Attachment 2 Circular_Letter_200-003-2 CalPERS.pdf
Attachment_3_HR_Revised_Salary_Survey_Ad_Hoc.pdf
18 -1-
Resolution No. 1392
RESOLUTION NO. 1392

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE UPDATED
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

FOR COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE

PAY SCHEDULES

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, all employers must comply with the compensation earnable and publicly available pay schedules provisions contained within California Government Code (GC) section 20636(d) and California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 2, Section 570.5; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Council to review and duly approve and adopt in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws a publicly available pay schedule; and
WHEREAS, attached to this resolution and incorporated by reference is the City’s comprehensive pay schedule which will be made publicly available on the City’s external website and provided upon request; and
WHEREAS, the City reviews and may revise employee compensation and salary schedule ranges; and
WHEREAS, the City benefits from a highly qualified, municipal workforce; and WHEREAS, to assist in retaining such a workforce, it is critical that the City’s compensation levels are competitive in the marketplace; and WHEREAS, the City should adjust salaries to reflect changes in the region’s cost of living; and
WHEREAS, the salaries are scheduled to take effect the beginning of the pay period that includes July 1, 2025;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills hereby:

19 -2-
Resolution No. 1392

1. Adopts the fiscal year 2025/26 pay schedule in Exhibit A, reflecting these pay adjustments effective the first pay period following the adoption of this resolution PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of June 2025. ________________________________
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christian Horvath
City Clerk
20 -3-
Resolution No. 1392

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
The foregoing Resolution No. 1392 entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE UPDATED
FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

FOR COMPENSATION EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE

PAY SCHEDULES
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of June, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH

CITY CLERK
21 -4-
Resolution No. 1392
Exhibit “A”
22 City of Rolling Hills
Salary Schedule Effective 7/1/2025 through 6/30/2026
Adopted by ResolutionNo. 1392
Full-Time Classification
Authorized
Positions
Monthly
Minimum
Monthly
Maximum
City Manager 1
Planning Manager 1 $ 7,457 $ 11,147
Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk 1 $ 7,624 $ 9,497 Management Analyst 1 $ 5,851 $ 8,341
Assistant Planner 1 $ 5,028 $ 6,417
Code Compliance Officer / Planning Technician 1 $ 4,551 $ 6,085 Administrative Assistant 1 $ 4,121 $ 5,795
$16,656
23 California Public Employees’ Retirement System
P.O. Box 942715 | Sacramento, CA 94229-2715
888 CalPERS (or 888-225-7377) | TTY: (877) 249-7442
www.calpers.ca.gov
Payroll
Circular Letter
January 8, 2020
Circular Letter: 200-003-20
Distribution: IV, VI, X, XII, XVI
To: All CalPERS Contracted Agencies (Public Agency, Schools, and State) Subject: Statutory and Regulatory Requirements for Publicly Available Pay Schedules Purpose
The purpose of this Circular Letter is to inform all CalPERS Contracted Agencies of the requirements for providing CalPERS with a Publicly Available Pay Schedule in compliance with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR).

Purpose of Publicly Available Pay Schedules
Under the PERL and PEPRA, compensation earnable and pensionable compensation are determined in accordance with amounts identified on publicly available pay schedules.

Compensation Earnable
Under Government (Gov.) Code sections 20636 and 20636.1, compensation earnable means the pay rate and special compensation of the member, as further defined by those statutes.

Pay rate for contracting agency and school members is deemed the normal monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member paid in cash to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules. Pay rate for contracting agency and school members who are not in a group or class is deemed the monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member, paid in cash and pursuant to publicly available pay schedules, for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, subject to specified limitations. 24 Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Pay rate for state members is deemed the average monthly remuneration paid in cash out of funds paid by the employer to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment, in payment for the member’s services or for time during which the member is excused from work, as further specified by subdivision (g) of Gov. Code 20636, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules.

Pensionable Compensation
Pursuant to Gov. Code section 7522.34, pensionable compensation of a new member of any public retirement system means the normal monthly rate of pay or base pay of the member paid in cash to similarly situated members of the same group or class of employment for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, pursuant to publicly available pay schedules, subject to specified limitations.

Requirements of Publicly Available Pay Schedules
Subdivision (a) of CCR section 570.5 defines the requirements for a publicly available pay schedule used to determine pay rates.

Pay rates shall be limited to the amount listed on a pay schedule that must meet all the following eight (8) requirements:

1. Be duly approved and adopted by the employer's governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meetings laws

2. Identify the position title for every employee position

3. Show the pay rate as a single amount or multiple amounts within a range for each identified position

4. Indicate the time base, including, but not limited to, whether the time base is hourly, daily, bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or annually

5. Be posted at the office of the employer or immediately accessible and available for public review from the employer during normal business hours or posted on the employer's website

6. Indicate an effective date and date of any revisions

7. Is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years

8. Does not reference another document in lieu of disclosing the pay rate Here is an example of a compliant pay schedule, to the extent it has been duly approved and adopted by the employer’s governing body in accordance with requirements of applicable public meeting laws, it is posted on the employer’s website, and it is retained by the employer and available for public inspection for not less than five years:
25 Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Classification Rate Type Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 City Manager Monthly $10,500 $11,000 $11,500 $12,000 $12,500 City Counsel Monthly $10,000 $10,500 $11,000 $11,500 $12,000 City Clerk Monthly $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 $7,500
Call Center Representative Monthly $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000 Analyst Monthly $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500 $7,000
Assistant Monthly $4,500 $5,000 $5,500 $6,000 $6,500
Revised as of 09/01/2017 and adopted by the Board as of 09/15/2017 City of CalPERS
Salary Schedule for Fiscal Year 17-18
Effective as of 07/01/2017
Special Compensation
Pursuant to CCR section 571 for classic members, and CCR section 571.1 for new members under PEPRA, special compensation items are defined under an exclusive list. Each special compensation item shall be reported separately from pay rate, in accordance with the criteria described in those regulations. Therefore, a publicly available pay schedule in which the special compensation items are reflected in the pay rates does not comply with CCR section 570.5.

Absence of Publicly Available Pay Schedule
If an employer fails to meet the requirements of subdivision (a) of CCR section 570.5, under subdivision (b), the board may determine in its sole discretion an amount that will be considered as pay rate, taking into consideration all information it deems relevant including, but not limited to, the following:
• Documents approved by the employer’s governing body in accordance with requirements of public meeting laws and maintained by the employer
• Last pay rate listed on a pay schedule that conforms to the requirements of subdivision (a) with the same employer for the position at issue
• Last pay rate for the member that is listed on a pay schedule that conforms with the requirements of subdivision (a) with the same employer for a different position • Last pay rate for the member in a position that was held by the member and that is listed on a pay schedule that conforms to the requirements of subdivision (a) of a former CalPERS employer.

Importance of Publicly Available Pay Schedule
Publicly available pay schedules are required by CalPERS and are a critical component to verify all members’ pay rates when calculating members’ retirement benefits. Maintaining a compliant publicly available pay schedule will support transparency and expedite CalPERS’ review process.
26 Circular Letter: 200-003-20
January 8, 2020

Failure to provide CalPERS with a compliant publicly available pay schedule may result in a retirement benefit being delayed.

Questions
It is the employer’s responsibility to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the employer’s contract with CalPERS and to ensure all reportable information is compliant with the PERL, PEPRA, and the CCR.

If you have any questions or concerns, contact the CalPERS Customer Contact Center at 888 CalPERS (or 888-225-7377), or email [email protected].

Renee Ostrander, Chief
Employer Account Management Division
27 Attachment 1
Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Avalon $ 18,375 $ 10,631 $ 13,713 $ 5,878 $ 7,582 - - $ 4,834 $ 6,235 $ 6,025 $ 7,771 $ 5,325 $ 6,869 - - $ 7,161 $ 9,237 - - Bradbury $ 12,500 - - $ 6,250 $ 7,917 - - - - $ 5,417 $ 7,917 - - - - - - - - El Segundo $ 24,336 $ 13,581 $ 18,750 $ 6,583 $ 8,373 - - $ 6,877 $ 8,359 $ 7,176 $ 9,128 $ 5,988 $ 7,278 - - $ 11,237 $ 14,293 $ 7,995 $ 9,718 Hidden Hills $ 17,917 - - $ 5,833 $ 8,711 - - - - $ 2,885 $ 4,038 - - - - - - - - La Habra Heights $ 12,471 - - - - $ 3,555 $ 4,764 - - - - - - - - - - Lawndale $ 21,239 $ 12,966 $ 15,761 $ 9,716 $ 11,810 $5,140 $6,247 $5,791 $7,039 $ 6,657 $ 8,092 $ 5,768 $ 7,005 - - $ 8,286 $ 10,072 $ 8,286 $ 10,072 Lomita $ 20,000 $ 12,688 $ 15,422 $ 8,547 $ 10,389 $ 4,013 $ 4,878 $ 5,346 $ 6,499 $ 6,200 $ 7,536 $ 5,397 $ 6,560 - - - - - - Palos Verdes Estates $ 20,833 $ 10,735 $ 16,050 $ 8,895 $ 11,148 $ 4,579 $ 5,845 $ 5,989 $ 7,280 $ 6,345 $ 8,502 - - - - $ 7,711 $ 9,672 - - Rancho Palos Verdes $ 21,250 $ 14,437 $ 18,768 $ 11,825 $ 15,373 $ 5,517 $ 7,173 $ 6,459 $ 8,426 $ 7,043 $ 9,156 $ 6,481 $ 8,424 - - $ 8,846 $ 11,500 $ 8,846 $ 11,500 Rolling Hills Estates $ 18,847 $ 12,276 $ 18,418 $ 8,546 $ 12,473 $ 4,469 $ 6,554 $ 6,012 $ 7,624 $ 7,202 $ 9,252 $ 4,971 $ 7,512 - - $ 7,707 $ 11,147 $ 7,707 $ 11,147 Signal Hill $ 22,917 $ 14,131 $ 18,542 $ 8,397 $ 10,716 $ 4,655 $ 5,941 $ 5,841 $ 7,457 $ 6,721 $ 8,578 $ 5,587 $ 7,130 - - $ 10,318 $ 13,169 $ 7,743 $ 9,883 Average $ 19,153 $ 12,681 $ 16,928 $ 8,047 $ 10,449 $ 4,561 $ 5,915 $ 5,894 $ 7,365 $ 6,167 $ 7,997 $ 5,645 $ 7,254 - - $ 8,752 $ 11,299 $ 8,115 $ 10,464 Median $ 20,000 $ 12,827 $ 17,234 $ 8,471 $ 10,553 $ 4,579 $ 5,941 $ 5,915 $ 7,368 $ 6,501 $ 8,297 $ 5,587 $ 7,130 - - $ 8,286 $ 11,147 $ 7,995 $ 10,072 10 Percent reduction $ 18,000 $ 11,544 $ 15,511 $ 7,624 $ 9,497 $ 4,121 $ 5,347 $ 5,324 $ 6,632 $ 5,851 $ 7,467 $ 5,028 $ 6,417 - - $ 7,457 $ 11,147 - - Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Rolling Hills - - - $ 7,624 $ 9,497 $ 4,121 $ 5,347 $ 4,551 $ 6,085 $ 5,851 $ 7,467 $ 5,028 $ 6,417 - - $ 7,457 $ 11,147 - - Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Rolling Hills $ 16,172 $ 12,351 $ 12,785 $ 6,488 $ 8,519 $ 4,373 $ 5,795 $ 4,551 $ 6,085 $ 6,449 $ 8,341 $4,551 $6,085 $25.63 $32.70 - - - - Bookkeeper/
Administrative
Clerk
Planning Manager Senior Planner Agency City Manager
Planning and
Community Services
Director
City Clerk/Executive
Assistant to the City
Manager
Administrative
Assistant
Code Enforcement
Officer
Management
Analyst
Administrative
Assistant
Code Compliance
Officer/Planning
Technician
Management
Analyst Assistant Planner
Assistant Planner
Bookkeeper/
Administrative
Clerk
Planning Manager Senior Planner Agency City Manager
Planning and
Community Services
Director
City Clerk/Assistant
to the City Manager
Revised Salary Survey of Comparable Cities
Management
Analyst Assistant Planner
Bookkeeper/
Administrative
Clerk
Planning Manager Senior Planner
City of Rolling Hills Recommended Salary Schedule
Current City of Rolling Hills Salary Ranges
Agency City Manager
Planning and
Community Services
Director
City Clerk/Executive
Assistant to the City
Manager
Administrative
Assistant
Code Enforcement
Officer
May 28, 2025
City Council Meeting 28
Agenda Item No.: 10.A
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: STEPHANIE GRANT, ASSISTANT PLANNER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5
FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR

ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, FOR THE
LOCATION AT 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (YOU & WANG) (LOT 6-SK)
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

Planning Commission Approval May 20, 2025
On May 20, 2025, the Planning Commission held a morning field trip at the subject property, with four commissioners present, with one commissioner absent. The commissioners reviewed the project during the field trip. One neighbor (14 Caballeros Road) was present at the field trip and expressed concerns about the project potentially impacting their view. The field trip proceeded to the public hearing meeting later that evening at City Hall. Four Commissioners were present, with one commissioner absent. During the evening public hearing, staff presented the project. The applicants' architect did attend the evening meeting, and no members from the public were present. After review and discussion, the Commission voted unanimously (4-0) to approve the project and adopted Resolution number 2025-05 (Attachment 6).

Zoning, Location, and Lot Description
The subject property is zoned RAS-1 and is located at 16 Caballeros Road. For development purposes, the net lot area, which excludes the roadway easement, is 1.44 acres (63,074 square feet). The first residential building pad is 8,307 square feet. The second pad is currently undeveloped and relatively flat.
29 The property is developed with a 4,207-square-foot residence with a 660-square-foot attached garage, a 1,140-square-foot courtyard, and a 170-square-foot service yard. The house was built in 1956. Photos of the entire property have been provided in Attachment 3.

The property is accessible off Caballeros Road and is developed with an existing 1,690 square foot driveway that leads to the attached garage and main residence on the first building pad. A portion of the main residence encroaches 20 feet and 8 inches into the front setback.

The second building pad is undeveloped and relatively flat, and it is located 35 feet below the first building pad with an existing 4-foot-high and 125-foot-long retaining wall and a 187-footlong fence. The lower portion of the lot is steeply sloped and relatively non-buildable. The lot has a depth of 367 feet in length and a width of 250 feet. An aerial view of the subject property has been provided in Attachment 4.

DISCUSSION:

Applicant Requests
On December 2, 2024, the applicant, Domingo Ottolia, of Ottolia & Barnes, on behalf of the property owners Zhao Wang and Hailong You, submitted a Site Plan Review application for non-exempt grading, walls to exceed 3 feet, and other improvements, including a Conditional Use Permit application for a pergola to exceed 200 square feet (the pergola is proposed to be 637 square feet).

The proposed improvements on the property also include a 480 square foot swimming pool/spa, 155 square foot stairs, 42 square foot outdoor kitchen, 16 square foot pool equipment, planters, and concrete pool deck that are not part of this discretionary approval by the Planning Commission but instead subject to ministerial review and approval by staff. A Project Summary Table for the project that requires Ministerial and Discretionary approvals is included in Attachment 5.

Discretionary Approvals
Site Plan Review for Non-exempt Grading
Section 17.46.020.A(1) requires a Site Plan Review (SPR) is require for projects for any grading, except when exempt. The total proposed grading for the Project is 203 Cubic Yards (147 CY of cut and 54 CY of fill). The 93 CY of cut for the swimming pool spa is exempt and will be exported. The Site Plan Review is for the non-exempt grading totaling 108 CY. The non-exempt grading will be balanced on-site. The grading plan have been included in Attachment 10.

The proposed improvements on the property also include a 480 square foot swimming pool/spa, 155 square foot stairs, 42 square foot outdoor kitchen, 16 square foot pool equipment, planters, and concrete pool deck at grade that are not part of this discretionary approval by the Planning Commission but instead subject to ministerial review and approval by staff. Table 1 on the next page provides details of the grading project type. 30 Table 1

GRADING

PROJECT
TYPE

CUT FILL MAX DEPTH
EXEMPT
OR
NONEXEMPT

DISCRETIONARY
OR

MINISTERIAL
Swimming
pool spa 93 CY (Exempt forExport) 7 feet Exempt Ministerial Fill Pool Deck
(southwest
side of pool
deck)
None 54 Cubic
Yards
46 inches
(3'10") Non-Exempt Discretionary
Retaining
Walls 50 CY None 42 inches(3'6") Non-Exempt Discretionary Stairway 2 Cubic Yards None 30 inches Non-Exempt Ministerial Stairs at the
bottom of the
steps
2 Cubic Yards None 8 feet Non-Exempt Discretionary
The proposed retaining wall located at the northern portion of the pool deck includes 54 cubic yards of cut at 42 inches deep (3 feet and 6 inches). The southwestern side of the pool deck involves 54 cubic yards of fill and 46 inches (3 feet and 6 inches). The grading exceeds the maximum 3-foot cut and fill. Therefore, a Site Plan Review is required to exceed 3 3-foot cuts and 3 3-foot fills with a maximum depth.

The proposed concrete stairway extends 35 feet from building Pad 1 to the lower level, and the grading for the stairs is very minimal. The total grading for the stairs is 2 cubic yards of cut at 30 inches deep into the natural slope, and a total of 155 square feet, 35 feet in length, and 54 inches wide. The stairway has been designed to follow natural contours of the slope to minimize grading. The cut for the bottom of the stairway is 5 feet max depth and is part of the Site Plan Review.

Site Plan Review for Walls Exceed 3 Feet Height
RHMC Section 17.16.190(F) requires a Site Plan Review for any walls that exceed the maximum height of 3 feet. The existing 4-foot-high and 125-foot-long retaining wall that extends along the secondary building pad will be removed and replaced with 2 new walls (one retaining and one planter wall). The proposed retaining wall on the corner northeast portion of the pool deck by the pool equipment will exceed the maximum allowable 3 feet maximum height, therefore a Site Plan Review has been requested. All the other proposed walls and planters will not exceed the 3-foot maximum height. The total square footage of the proposed landscaped planter areas is 563 square feet.

Conditional Use Permit for Pergola
Rolling Hills Municipal Code Section 17.16.040(A)(3) requires a Conditional Use Permit for 31 any detached accessory structures that exceed two hundred square feet. The pergola requires a Conditional Use Permit approval because it exceeds the maximum allowable 200 square feet by 436 square feet for a total of 636 square feet (it will not exceed 800 square feet maximum).

The new pergola will be located on the pool deck at the southwest portion of the recreational building pad. The pergola is 13 feet wide by 42 feet long and 10 feet and 9 inches in height.

Municipal Code Compliance
Setbacks
The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the RAS1 Zone, districts, including size, setbacks, and location. The Project complies with all of the development standards of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.

Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage
The Project complies with the Development Standards in the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code. The Architectural Plans have been included as Attachment 9. The existing structural coverage is 5,487 square feet or 8.7%, and the project proposes a net of 1,054 square feet or

1.6%, for a total of 6,541 square feet or 10.3%. This is still under the maximum allowed 20% structural coverage.

The existing flatwork coverage is 4,322 square feet or 6.8%, and the project proposes 2,631 or 4.2% square feet of structural cove age for a total of 6,953 square feet or 11.0%. This is still under the maximum allowed 15% structural coverage.

The project proposes to add 3,685 square feet or 5.8% of combined structural and flatwork coverage. The total overall structural and flatwork coverage will result in 13,494 square feet or

21.3%, which is still well under the maximum allowed 35%structural and flatwork coverage.

See Attachment 2 for more details.

The first residential building pad 1 has a total pad area of 8,307 square feet. Existing coverage with deductions is 5,037 square feet or 60.6%. The total existing Building Pad Coverage with deductions is above the maximum 30% guideline by 30.6%, because a portion of the main residence encroaches 20 feet and 8 inches into the front setback. Therefore, the square footage in the front setback does not count in the building pad coverage calculations.

The existing second pad is undeveloped and relatively flat, but the applicants are proposing a 3,255 square foot recreational building pad with a 1,000 square foot set-aside area for a total of 4,255 square feet. The existing retaining wall, fence, and trees will be removed for the proposed project. The recreational pad will be developed with a swimming pool/spa, pergola, stairs, outdoor kitchen, retaining walls, planters with landscape, concrete pool deck, and a stairway from the first building pad.

The total disturbed area is 16,510 square feet or 26.2% and is well below the 40% maximum guideline. The proposed project is located in an area that is already disturbed and developed. 32 Height
The maximum height of the pergola is 10 feet and 6 inches.

Environmental Review
The proposed project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Public Noticing and Correspondence
Public notices were mailed to residents within a 1,000 ft. radius from the development on May 9, 2025 (see Attachment 1). Notifications of the development and Planning Commission meeting were published in the Daily Breeze on May 10, 2025 (see Attachment 7).

Neighbor Concerns
On May 13, 2025, staff received a phone call from Juli Avedissian (resident at 14 Caballeros Road) regarding the public notice she received in the mail. She had concerns about the project's impact on her views. On May 18, 2025, Mrs. Avedissian sent an email to the City requesting that staff email the plans (see attachment 8). Staff informed her that, due to copyright restrictions, plans can't be emailed, but she could view the plans in the office or wait until they were published. On May 15, 2025, Mrs. Avedissian visited City Hall to review the plans. On May 20, 2025, Mrs. Avedissian attended the morning field trip meeting. On June 18, 2025, staff called Mrs. Avedissian, and she confirmed that she and her husband have no issues with the project. The project will not have any impact on their views.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: PL_ADR_250514_16CaballerosRd_RadiusMap_PCMeeting.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_250513_16CaballerosRD_ZC24-154_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment 3: PL_ADR_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154_Photos of Site.pdf Attachment 4: PL_ADR_250525_16Caballeros_Aerial View of Site_GIS.pdf Attachment 5: 250514_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-Summary of Project Table.pdf Attachment 6: 250618_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-Summary of Project Table_CC.pdf Attachment 7: CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon_Affidavit.pdf Attachment 8: Email from JuliAvedissian_14 CaballerosRd Attachment 9:PL_ADR_250515_16CaballerosRoad_ZC24-
154_ArchitecturalPlans_4thSubmittal.pdf
250618_16CaballerosRd_ZC24-154-GradingPlans.pdf
33 City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 24-154
Conditional Use Permit & Site Plan Review
OWNER Wang & You
ADDRESS 16 Caballeros, Rolling Hills 90274 SITE
34 Development Table
Zoning Case No. 24-154
16 Caballeros Road

SITE PLAN REVIEW

AND CONDITIONAL

USE PERMIT

EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
Net Lot Area 0 SF 0 SF 63,074 SF
Residence 4,207 SF 0 SF 4,207 SF
Garage 660 SF 0 SF 660 SF
Swimming Pools/Spa 0 SF 480 SF 480 SF
Pool Equipment 0 SF 16 SF 16 SF
Guest House 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Pergola 0 SF 636 SF 636 SF
Stable 450 SF 0 SF 450 SF
Recreation Court 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Entryway/Porte Cochere, Breezeways 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Attached Trellises 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Detached Structures:

Outdoor Kitchen 0 SF 42 SF 42 SF
Service Yard 170 SF 0 SF 170 SF
Other: Stairs 0 SF 155 SF 155 SF
Primary Driveway 1,690 SF 0 SF 1,690 SF
Paved Walkways, Patio Areas,
Courtyards
2,632 SF 155 SF 2,787 SF
Pool Decking 0 SF 2,476 SF 2,476 SF
Other Paved Driveways, Road
Easements, Parking Pads
0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Grading (balanced onsite) 0 CY 147 CY CUT
54 CY FILL
93 EXPORT EXEMPT
201 CY TOTAL
*Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum with deductions)
5,487 SF (8.7%) 1,054 SF (1.6%) 6,541 SF (10.3%)
Flatwork Lot Coverage
(15% maximum)
4,322 SF (6.8%) 2,631 SF (4.2%) 6,953 SF (11.0%)
*Total Lot Coverage (Structures and
Flatwork) (35% maximum with
deductions)
9,809 SF (15.5%) 3,685 SF (5.8%) 13,494 SF (21.3%)
Total Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
16,510 SF (26.2%) 0 SF (0%) 16,510 SF (26.2%)
*Building Pad 1 (8,307? SF)
(30% Maximum Guideline)
5,037 STRUCTURE AREA
(60.6%)
0 SF STRUCTURE
AREA (0%)
5,037 SF STRUCTURE
AREA (60.6?%)
*Building Pad 1 (4,255 SF)
(30% Maximum Guideline
450 STRUCTURE AREA
(10.5%)
1,054 SF STRUCTURE
AREA (24.8%)
1,504 SF STRUCTURE
AREA (35.3%)
*EXCLUDING: up to 5 (legal) & up to 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. (no more than 120 sq.ft. per structure per deduction, except for trellis)
35 36
37 38
39 Aerial View of Site: 16 Caballeros Road
40 1
Planning Commission Meeting May 20, 2025
16 Caballeros Road (Zoning Case No. 24-154)

PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE
ITEM
#

PROPOSED DESCRIPTION RHMC REQUIRES

DISCRETIONARY
OR

MINISTERIAL

APPROVAL
1) Non-exempt
grading
The project includes nonexempt grading for total of
108 CY. (54 CY fill for the
northeastern portion of the
retaining wall & 54 CY cut
for the southeastern
portion of the pool deck.

Site Plan Review (SPR) is
required for any grading
exempt when exempt
pursuant to Rolling Hills
Municipal Code (RHMC)
Section 17.46.020(A)(1)
Discretionary
2) Swimming
Pool/Spa
480 SF swimming
pool/spa, 7 feet deep.

17.16.030(K) - Accessory
uses and structures are an
allowed use and structures
are permitted as accessory
to a legally established
single-family residence.

Swimming pool, including
outdoor spa not to exceed
800 SF
Ministerial
3) Pool Deck Concrete pool deck Less
than 12 inches. 2,476 SF
2,476 SF pool deck still
well below the required
15% flatwork coverage
Ministerial
4) Pergola 636 SF detached pergola,
10’6” height
A Conditional Use Permit is
required for accessory
structures that exceed 200
SF (maximum 800 SF)
Discretionary
5) Stairway 155 SF stairway to
descend to the lower
building pad. 35 feet long
and 54 inches wide. The
grading for the stairs is 30
inches deep.

Grading less than 3 feet cut
and fill does not require
SPR
Ministerial
6) Stairs at the
bottom of steps
The stairs at the bottom of
the slope and pool deck,
5-foot maximum cut into
the slope
Grading more than 3 feet
cut and fill will require SPR
Discretionary
7) Walls (East
side of pool
The proposed retaining
wall on the northeast
The RHMC Section

17.16.190(F), requires a
Discretionary
41 2
ITEM
#

PROPOSED DESCRIPTION RHMC REQUIRES

DISCRETIONARY
OR

MINISTERIAL

APPROVAL
deck) corner of the pool deck by
the pool equipment will
exceed the maximum
allowable 3 feet maximum
height, therefore a SPR
SPR for any walls that
exceed the maximum 3
feet height.
8) Walls
(Westside of
pool deck)
The proposed retaining
walls on the westside pool
deck will not exceed the
maximum allowable 3 feet.

A wall below three feet
shall be subject
administrative review and
shall not be located in the
front yard or in any setback
Ministerial
9) Outdoor
Kitchen
The new outdoor kitchen
is 42 SF and will be
located in the pergola

17.16.030(L) - Accessory
uses and structures are an
allowed use and structures
are permitted as accessory
to a legally established
single-family residence.

Freestanding outdoor BBQ
or kitchen not to exceed
200 SF
Ministerial
10)
11)
Legend:

Variance VAR
Site Plan Review SPR
Conditional Use
Permit
CUP
Ministerial Review MR
Discretionary Review DR
42 1
City Council Meeting May 23, 2025
16 Caballeros Road (Zoning Case No. 24-154)

PROPOSED PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE
ITEM
#

PROPOSED DESCRIPTION ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL

CODE (RHMC)

REQUIRES

DISCRETIONARY
OR

MINISTERIAL

APPROVAL
1) Non-exempt
grading
The project includes nonexempt grading for total of
108 CY. (54 CY fill for the
northeastern portion of the
retaining wall & 54 CY cut
for the southeastern
portion of the pool deck.

Section 17.46.020(A)(1)
Site Plan Review (SPR) is
required for any grading
exempt when exempt
pursuant to Rolling Hills
Municipal Code (RHMC)
Discretionary
(Site Plan Review)
2) Swimming
Pool/Spa &
pool equipment
480 SF swimming
pool/spa, 7 feet deep. 16
SF pool equipment.

Section 17.16.030(K) -
Accessory uses and
structures are an allowed
use and structures are
permitted as accessory to a
legally established singlefamily residence.

Swimming pool, including
outdoor spa not to exceed
800 SF
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
3) Pool Deck Concrete pool deck Less
than 12 inches. 2,476 SF.

The building pad is
already existing and
undeveloped.
2,476 SF pool deck still
well below the required
15% flatwork coverage
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
4) Pergola 636 SF detached pergola,
10’6” height
Section 17.16.040(A)(3)
Conditional Use Permit is
required for accessory
structures that exceed 200
SF (maximum 800 SF)
Discretionary
(Conditional Use
Permit)
5) Stairway 155 SF stairway to
descend to the lower
building pad. 35 feet long
and 54 inches wide. The
grading for the stairs is 30
inches deep.

Grading less than 3 feet cut
and fill does not require
SPR
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
6) Stairs at the
bottom of steps
The stairs at the bottom of
the slope and pool deck,
5-foot maximum cut into
Grading more than 3 feet
cut and fill will require SPR
Discretionary
(Site Plan Review)
43 2
ITEM
#

PROPOSED DESCRIPTION ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL

CODE (RHMC)

REQUIRES

DISCRETIONARY
OR

MINISTERIAL

APPROVAL
the slope
7) Walls (East
side of pool
deck)
The proposed retaining
wall on the northeast
corner of the pool deck by
the pool equipment will
exceed the maximum
allowable 3 feet maximum
height, therefore a SPR
Section 17.16.190(F),
requires a SPR for any
walls that exceed the
maximum 3 feet height.

Discretionary
(Site Plan Review)
8) Walls
(Westside of
pool deck)
The proposed retaining
walls on the westside pool
deck will not exceed the
maximum allowable 3 feet.

A wall below three feet
shall be subject
administrative review and
shall not be located in the
front yard or in any setback
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
9) Outdoor
Kitchen
The new outdoor kitchen
is 42 SF and will be
located in the pergola
Section 17.16.030(L) -
Accessory uses and
structures are an allowed
use and structures are
permitted as accessory to a
legally established singlefamily residence.

Freestanding outdoor BBQ
or kitchen not to exceed
200 SF
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
10) Planters There are 3 FT maximum
height and 573 SF
planters that extend along
the west and east portions
of the pool deck. There
are 2 shorter sections
located at the northwest
and southwest corners.

A wall below three feet
shall be subject
administrative review and
shall not be located in the
front yard or in any setback
Ministerial
(Administrative
Review)
Legend:

Variance VAR
Site Plan Review SPR
Conditional Use
Permit
CUP
Ministerial Review MR
Discretionary Review DR
44 CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon - Page 1 of 1 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
[email protected]
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Account Number: 5007827
Ad Order Number: 0011734959
Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication: Daily Breeze
Publication Dates: 05/10/2025
Total Amount: $783.56
Payment Amount: $0.00
Amount Due: $783.56
Notice ID: qP6Z07IBcCSBMNmYOQJq
Invoice Text: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND FIELD TRIP PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills will conduct public hearing field trip visits starting at 7:30 AM on Tuesday, May 20, 2025, at the following properties for the purpose of receiving public input on the projects described below: 1st field trip 7:30 AM 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 6-SK) ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUESTS FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY

STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (WANG & YOU) 2nd FIELD TRIP AT 7:50 AM 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A-EF) ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LEE) Both projects have been 45 CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon - Page 1 of 1 Daily Breeze
2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
0011734959
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Los Angeles
I am a citizen of the United States and
a resident of the County aforesaid; I
am over the age of eighteen years, and
not party to or interested in the aboveentitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Daily Breeze, a
newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of
Torrance*, County of Los Angeles, and
which newspaper has been adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation by the
Superior Court of County of Los
Angeles, State of California, under the
date of June 15, 1945, Decree No.

Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the
annexed is a printed copy (set in type
not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to wit:
05/10/2025
I certify (or declare) under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.

Dated at Hermosa Beach, California
On this 10th day of May, 2025.
______________________________
Signature
*Daily Breeze circulation includes the following
cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El
Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne,
Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale,
Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan
Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes,
Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes
Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa
Monica, Torrance and Wilmington
46 For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in

Acrobat X or Adobe Reader X, or later.

Get Adobe Reader Now!
47 4/14/2025
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SAMANTHA CREW, MANAGEMENT ANALYST
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE A PRESENTATION REGARDING CALOES/FEMA

BUYOUT PROGRAM
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Palos Verdes faced significant land movement in areas such as Seaview, Portuguese Bend Beach Club, and the Portuguese Bend Community Association. These areas lie atop a complex ancient landslide system that was reactivated in 1956 and further accelerated by heavy rainfall in 2023 and 2024. The area’s bentonite-rich clay soil contributes to ongoing ground instability, resulting in significant damage to roads, utilities, and homes.

Some residents were forced to abandon their properties or implement structural shoring to stabilize their homes against the shifting terrain.

In September 2024, the City of Rolling Hills experienced unexpected utility shutoffs in the Flying Triangle, Cinchring Road, and Quail Ridge Road South areas due to land movement, impacting electricity, gas, and telecommunications services. In response, the City worked with its residents to mitigate disruptions, engaging legal counsel, hosting community meetings, coordinating emergency communications, expediting permits for alternative power sources, and working closely with utility providers, local organizations, and regional partners. Relief and support measures were launched, including donations, neighborhood outreach, and advocacy at the state and federal levels. While power and gas outages affected dozens of homes, the City continues to coordinate with agencies and utility companies to restore services, communicate updates, and support long-term resiliency planning.

Overall, the scale and severity of damage in Rancho Palos Verdes significantly exceeds that of Rolling Hills.

In October 2024, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, in partnership with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), launched a $42 million Voluntary Property Buyout Program to support homeowners in the Greater Portuguese Bend landslide area. The Cal OES Voluntary Buyout Program, 60 administered by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services and funded through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), is intended to help local governments reduce long-term risks to people and property in areas prone to recurring natural hazards such as wildfires, flooding, and landslides. The program provides financial assistance to acquire high-risk properties, with the goal of removing structures from hazardous areas and converting the land to permanent open space.

By the program’s application deadline of November 8, 2025, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes received 85 applications. Of these, 52 (61%) came from residents in the Portuguese Bend Community Association, 21 (25%) from the Seaview community, and 12 (14%) from the Beach Club. Following the program’s announcement and the City’s release of minimum eligibility criteria, 20 properties were red-tagged and 37 yellow-tagged, compared to just two red-tagged and four yellow-tagged homes before October 28, 2024.

The City of Rancho Palos Verdes was able to mobilize quickly, and the successful award of funds was a direct result of its years of research, consistent grant application efforts, comprehensive data collection, and the ongoing land movement impacting the area.

Beginning in November 2024, Rolling Hills City staff initiated a series of coordination meetings with Cal OES to discuss the framework, requirements, and strategic considerations for implementing a Voluntary Buyout Program in Rolling Hills. These discussions have continued consistently through December, January, February, April, and May, reflecting the City’s commitment to thoroughly understanding the program’s structure before making any formal decisions. Each meeting focused specifically on how the buyout process could be tailored to the City’s unique circumstances, including eligibility criteria, property valuation procedures, funding mechanisms, and long-term implications for residents and the City. Staff sought to clarify regulatory expectations, outline potential roles and responsibilities, and gather insight into how similar programs have been successfully executed elsewhere in California.

On November 25, 2024, staff provided the City Council with an update on federal emergency management grant programs administered by Cal OES in partnership with FEMA (Attachment A). The update focused on the $42 million Voluntary Property Buyout Program introduced by RPV, which now serves as a model for potential hazard mitigation strategies applicable to the City of Rolling Hills. Staff shared that the RPV program, funded through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), assisted property owners in areas at risk of imminent failure due to ongoing land movement by offering fair market value for their properties and converting acquired parcels into permanently protected open space. Staff also shared that a Presidentially-declared major disaster triggers HMGP funding. Once a disaster meets federal assistance thresholds, FEMA activates the program, allowing funds to flow through state agencies like Cal OES to eligible local governments, special districts, and nonprofits for longterm hazard mitigation projects.

On December 10, 2024, Robyn Fennig, Assistant Director of the Hazard Mitigation Branch at Cal OES, visited Rolling Hills to tour impacted areas and engage with residents, staff, and City Council. That evening, she delivered a presentation to the Rolling Hills City Council during its regularly scheduled meeting (Attachment B). Her presentation provided an in-depth overview of the State Hazard Mitigation Program, addressing topics such as funding authorization, FEMA application requirements, eligible project activities, BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities) funding, and the process for submitting a Notice of Interest (NOI). Since the December 10 meeting, staff have continued to meet with Ms. Fennig and her 61 team to review potential funding pathways and have also spoken with residents interested in participating in such a program.

This evening, Ms. Fennig will present to the City Council an overview of current grant funding opportunities, the status of programs that are no longer available, and information regarding a potential, if feasible, buyout program for the City of Rolling Hills. Her presentation will also include an update on FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and the recent Presidential Declaration (DR-4856), which enables eligible agencies to apply for federal hazard mitigation funding (Attachment C).

In connection with the DR-4856 declaration for the California wildfires, Ms. Fennig advised that the City may benefit from participating in the current funding cycle, especially considering the uncertainty surrounding future federal funding opportunities. In April, Cal OES released a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for DR-4856 (Attachment D), opening the door for Los Angeles County jurisdictions to apply for available disaster recovery funds. To preserve eligibility, City staff submitted a non-binding draft Notice of Interest (NOI) by the May 29 deadline. This preliminary submission does not obligate the City to pursue the grant but keeps the option open.

After the presentations, Staff will seek City Council direction on whether to proceed with the DR-4856 grant opportunity by finalizing and officially submitting the NOI. Should the Council choose to move forward, the next step would be to prepare and submit a subapplication by the September 15, 2025 deadline. Cal OES will then review and develop the subapplications for submission to FEMA by April 2026. Alternatively, the Council may direct staff to conduct additional research and return at a future meeting for further discussion.

DISCUSSION:

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
The Voluntary Buyout Program (part of FEMA’s HMGP) allows the City to acquire residential properties that have been damaged or are at imminent risk from natural hazards. Participation is entirely voluntary, and eligible properties must include permitted residential structures. The City purchases qualifying properties at fair market value, based on a predetermined appraisal date, demolishes any existing structures, and converts the land to permanently protected open space, as required by FEMA regulations.

A city must act as the sub-applicant and submit an application to Cal OES on behalf of interested property owners. If the application is approved, participating homeowners are offered fair market compensation for their property, based either on pre-disaster or current appraised value, depending on program criteria and timing. Acquired properties are deedrestricted to remain undeveloped in perpetuity and may only be used for open space, recreation, or natural floodplain functions.

FEMA funds up to 75% of eligible project costs under the Voluntary Buyout Program, with the remaining 25% covered either by the property owner or through in-kind contributions from the City. The program is administered by Cal OES and locally managed by the City, which selects properties for participation based on criteria such as structural damage, program eligibility, and overall community benefit. Homeowners must apply through the City, not directly to FEMA or Cal OES. Once acquired, properties must be demolished and permanently maintained as 62 open space and they cannot be resold to private individuals or redeveloped.

To initiate the process, the local jurisdiction must assess community interest and determine whether the buyout aligns with broader hazard mitigation and land-use planning goals. The City is responsible for preparing a detailed application to Cal OES, which includes environmental assessments, cost-benefit analysis, and documentation of the hazard risk. Cal OES then reviews the submission and forwards qualifying proposals to FEMA.

An important program requirement is demonstrating cost-effectiveness through FEMA’s Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) methodology, using a specialized software toolkit. The BCA is used to demonstrate that a hazard mitigation project is cost-effective by showing that the expected benefits equal or exceed the project costs. To support this, the City must identify benefits recognized by FEMA, such as avoided damages, emergency response costs, service disruptions, and displacement, and accurately document all project costs, including construction, design, and compliance. Using FEMA-approved data sources and hazard information, the City must also demonstrate the frequency and severity of the risk and provide supporting documentation, such as maps, cost estimates, and damage data. The BCA is often the most difficult threshold to meet, and even well-developed proposals may be excluded from consideration if they fail to demonstrate adequate cost-effectiveness.

The Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) review process ensures that all program applications comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and other program-specific environmental regulations. This compliance review can take several months to complete and must be finalized before the City can receive FEMA approval.

The Voluntary Buyout Program is not intended for immediate post-disaster relief but is part of a long-term hazard mitigation strategy. Due to environmental reviews and the federal approval process, extended time may pass between application submission and actual property acquisition. Cities considering participation must be prepared to lead a transparent community engagement process, support applicants throughout the program, and assume responsibility for managing the acquired land in perpetuity.

Rancho Palos Verdes Voluntary Buyout Program
In May 2025, City of Rolling Hills staff met with representatives from the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV) to learn about their experience designing and implementing a Voluntary Buyout Program under FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). The purpose of the meeting was to understand the program’s development from initial concept to current implementation and to gather insights and lessons learned from a neighboring jurisdiction already navigating this complex process. The information provided by RPV offers a valuable roadmap for communities considering a similar initiative.

RPV launched its buyout program in response to accelerated land movement in the Greater Portuguese Bend area. City staff emphasized the importance of establishing clear systems and procedures from the outset. This included designing a transparent application process, conducting broad and inclusive outreach to potentially eligible property owners, and creating structured screening and evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and efficiency.

RPV received 85 applications, of which 23 were selected to move forward. The selection 63 process began with strict minimum eligibility requirements. Notably, applicants involved in either of the two lawsuits, Black or Monks, stemming from prior development agreements in high-risk areas were deemed ineligible, as those agreements included waivers against future claims. Additionally, any applicant involved in active litigation against the City was required to release all legal claims prior to being awarded grant funds.

Program Design and Funding
RPV’s program is strictly voluntary; homeowners are not required to participate, and eminent domain is not used. Properties in RPV are acquired at fair market value as determined by a licensed real estate appraiser, using a set appraisal date (e.g., December 1, 2022). FEMA provides 75% of the property acquisition cost and associated eligible expenses, including:

Appraisal and title search costs
Lot surveys (if needed)
Real estate transaction, escrow, and closing costs
Demolition and site restoration
Environmental remediation (e.g., lead paint or asbestos removal) RPV is responsible for advancing all upfront costs, which are later reimbursed by FEMA. To manage the workload and meet compliance obligations, the City contracted with a grant management firm to support both pre-award application development and post-award program administration.

To meet FEMA’s 25% non-federal cost share requirement, property owners contribute the remaining share through a deduction from the final fair market value payment. A portion of this contribution is held in escrow at closing to cover costs such as demolition and restoration. Any remaining balance is returned to the property owner upon completion and closeout of site restoration.

Properties acquired through the program must be demolished and cleared, with the site regraded and restored to eliminate any public safety concerns. Once cleared, the land is permanently deed-restricted for open space, recreation, or natural hazard mitigation functions and cannot be redeveloped or sold to private individuals.

Appeals, Phased Implementation, and Grant Management
RPV implemented the program in phases, starting with the acquisition of three properties funded through an initial $10 million allocation from their General Fund reserves. The City must wait for reimbursement from this first round before proceeding with the next set of property purchases. To streamline operations, the City relied on pre-qualified vendors for appraisal, title, and escrow services and planned to issue RFPs for demolition contractors.

While surveyor services were not yet required, the City remained prepared to issue additional RFPs if needed.

To address potential disputes over property valuations, RPV developed a formal appraisal appeal process. The City contracted with two separate appraisal firms, one for the Portuguese Bend area and another for the Seaview neighborhood. If a property owner challenged their appraisal, the case was reviewed by the alternate firm for an independent secondary valuation.
64 RPV also noted the importance of accounting for in-kind costs such as staff time and administrative resources, which can be significant. Outsourcing key program components helped the City manage these demands while maintaining compliance with federal and state requirements.

Eligibility and Prioritization Criteria
RPV, in coordination with Cal OES and FEMA, ensured that each application complies with all applicable program rules, regulations, and federal requirements, including Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) and Environmental and Historic Preservation (EHP) guidelines. Only properties deemed eligible by FEMA would advance to the formal selection process.

Minimum eligibility criteria include:

The property is not bank-owned (mortgages do not disqualify; foreclosure ownership does)
The property has not changed ownership since December 1, 2022 The property contains legally permitted residential structures The applicant is the legal property owner according to the County Assessor and building permit records
Once eligibility was established, properties were prioritized for acquisition based on the following factors:

1. Properties red-tagged by the City’s Building Official.

2. Properties yellow-tagged by the City’s Building Official.

3. Properties in imminent danger of being red or yellow tagged due to proximity to fissures, sinkholes, or other geologic hazards.

4. Properties that have been de-energized indefinitely.

5. Properties offering strategic value for landslide stabilization or winterization efforts.

6. Properties that enhance or expand the adjacent Palos Verdes Nature Preserve.

Duplication of Benefits
FEMA regulations prohibit duplication of benefits. If a property owner has received financial assistance (e.g., insurance payouts or other grants) for the same damage or purpose, those amounts must be accounted for and deducted from the buyout payment unless the owner can document that the funds were used for repairs. For example, if a structure was damaged and the owner received insurance funds for repairs, they must prove that those funds were spent.

If not, FEMA will reduce the buyout amount accordingly.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In evaluating the potential participation in the Cal OES Voluntary Buyout Program, it is important to consider not only the grant funding and long-term benefits of hazard mitigation, but also the fiscal impacts that accompany property acquisitions. The following outlines a few key cost considerations that would affect the City’s general fund and operational responsibilities should it move forward with a property buyout program:
65 Potential Ongoing Costs (all estimates):

Loss of Property Tax Revenue
Each acquired property is permanently removed from the tax rolls.

Example: A $3.5 million property could generate $2,700/year for the City (1% of assessed value = $35,000/year paid by the property owner. Most cities in LA County receive about 7–8% of the 1% general levy collected by the County. $35,000 × 0.077 (7.7%) = $2,695/year to the City).

Multiple acquisitions would result in a cumulative annual revenue loss.

Parcel Maintenance
Vacant lots require vegetation management to comply with fire codes.

Costs vary based on terrain, vegetation density, and contractor rates.

Liability Insurance
Annual cost depends on parcel access, size, location, and risk exposure.

Estimated range: $1,000 - $3,000 per parcel annually, higher if public access is allowed or terrain is hazardous.

Each City-owned parcel will be added to the City's Property schedule and reported to the California Joint Powers Authority on an annual basis.

Program Administration
As seen in RPV, in-kind contributions (e.g., staff coordination, oversight) remain under 1% of the total FEMA grant.

Grant Management Services
The City may need to hire a specialized grant management firm to initiate and oversee the application process for the Cal OES Voluntary Buyout Program.

CONCLUSION
The City of Rolling Hills recognizes the severe impact the recent utility shutoffs and ongoing land movement have had on residents in the Flying Triangle, Cinchring Road, and Quail Ridge Road South areas. These disruptions have led to significant financial burdens for many, including costs associated with prolonged outages, alternative energy solutions, and, in some cases, unreported home repairs necessitated by ground instability.

As the City considers participation in the Cal OES Voluntary Buyout Program, it is essential to weigh both the immediate and long-term implications of acquiring properties behind the gates.

While the program offers a potential path toward permanent risk reduction and open space preservation, it also represents a substantial policy and fiscal commitment that will shape the City’s future land use, financial planning, and emergency management responsibilities.

Tonight’s discussion provides an opportunity to reflect on the technical and regulatory dimensions of a potential buyout initiative, as well as the potential impacts it may have on our community. Informed by Rancho Palos Verdes' experience, staff recommend that the City Council carefully evaluate the potential grant opportunity and provide direction on whether to proceed with finalizing the Notice of Interest (NOI) for the current DR-4856 funding cycle and/or ask that Staff return to the City Council with additional information. 66 FISCAL IMPACT:

Unknown at this time
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A CL_AGN_241125_CC_Item15B.pdf
Attachment B CL_AGN_241210_CC_Item4B.pdf
Attachment C FEMA-4856-DR-CA Major Disaster.pdf
Attachment D Cal OES DR-4856 HMGP NOFO.pdf
67 Agenda Item No.: 15.B
Mtg. Date: 11/25/2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE A VERBAL UPDATE ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) GRANT PROGRAMMING

ADMINISTERED BY CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF
EMERGENCY SERVICES (Cal OES)
DATE: November 25, 2024
BACKGROUND:

On October 29, 2024, the City of Rancho Palos Verdes (RPV), in partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), introduced a $42 million Voluntary Property Buyout Program aimed at assisting property owners in the Greater Portuguese Bend landslide area. This program, funded by FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), is designed to help homeowners whose properties have been damaged or are at risk of imminent failure from ongoing land movement. This program offers homeowners fair market value for their properties based on pre-disaster appraisals based on property conditions in December 2022.

Through this initiative, eligible homeowners will have the option to relocate to safer areas, while the acquired properties will be converted into permanently protected open space. These properties will be deed-restricted to prevent future redevelopment, enhance community resilience, and reduce future risks in vulnerable areas.

This evening, staff will present an overview of RPV’s program as a potential model for hazard mitigation strategies in the Rolling Hills community. Following the presentation, staff seek direction from the City Council on the following actions:

1. Authorize staff to arrange a meeting with Cal OES for a site visit to the City of Rolling Hills and attend a future City Council meeting; and

2. Direct staff to begin coordinating with Cal OES specifically to apply for available grant programs and return to the Council with updates and any required approvals.

These efforts explore proactive measures for addressing natural hazards while protecting 681
community safety and resilience.

DISCUSSION:

On November 11, 2024, staff provided the City Council with an update on recent discussions held with Cal OES representatives to explore the Voluntary Buyout Program, along with other potential Cal OES funding and mitigation programs. This briefing aimed to inform the Council of Staff's research efforts into state-supported hazard mitigation options that could enhance community resilience in Rolling Hills. City Council members inquired about specific program criteria and funding requirements and requested that staff conduct a more detailed assessment of the Voluntary Buyout Program’s applicability and feasibility for the City of Rolling Hills. This follow-up analysis will consider program eligibility, funding structures, and potential outcomes for affected residents and the community.

PROGRAMS:

This section outlines summaries of programs for which the City of Rolling Hills may be eligible.

FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program
Cal OES administers the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program (HMA Program), which focuses on reducing the risks posed by natural hazards. These programs aim to fund projects that help communities mitigate the impact of disasters, including floods, wildfires, and other natural hazard threats. By supporting hazard mitigation efforts, Cal OES plays a critical role in enhancing public safety and resilience across California.

The FEMA HMA Programs are designed to support state, local, tribal, and territorial efforts to reduce the impact of future disasters by funding cost-effective, technically feasible, eligible projects that mitigate risks associated with natural hazards. These programs focus on longterm risk reduction and help communities minimize the impact of natural disasters before they happen. The key programs under HMA include:

1. Legislative Pre-Disaster Mitigation (LPDM): This program funds projects that reduce the risk of natural disasters before they occur through coordination with Congressional representatives (e.g., the House and Senate). Funding appropriated to selected communities can be used to strengthen infrastructure, improve resilience, and protect lives and property.

2. Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA): This annual nationally competitive program is specifically aimed at reducing the risk of flood damage for structures backed by policies in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). This program provides funding for projects that reduce the financial and physical impacts of flooding, such as elevating buildings or improving drainage systems to reduce the losses to the NFIP.

3. Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC): This annual, nationally competitive all-hazards program was established as part of the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 and focuses on funding proactive projects that improve resilience to natural hazards, such as wildfires, earthquakes, hurricanes, and floods.

4. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMPG): This all-hazards post-disaster funding program is one of the opportunities made available following a Presidentially declared disaster through the Stafford Act. This funding can be used statewide to implement costeffective projects that reduce the impacts of natural hazards across California. 692
The HMA programs help fund initiatives like elevating structures, retrofitting buildings, flood control projects, and creating early warning systems. Their ultimate goal is to reduce the loss of life, property damage, and economic impact of disasters, thereby increasing the resilience of communities to future hazards.

Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Funding (HMGP)
Funding for HMGP is triggered by a Presidentially-declared major disaster declaration. When a natural disaster, such as a wildfire, flood, earthquake, or hurricane, meets the severity and impact thresholds to qualify for federal assistance in the Public Assistance (PA) Program and/or Individual Assistance (IA) Program, the president may issue a disaster declaration, allowing FEMA to activate HMGP funding. This funding is then made available to state emergency management agencies (e.g., Cal OES) to pass funding through to state, tribal, and local governments, some private non-profit organizations, and eligible special districts to implement long-term hazard mitigation measures aimed at reducing future disaster risks.

Once a major disaster is declared and HMGP is made available, Cal OES works with FEMA to identify and prioritize eligible projects. The amount of funding allocated to HMGP is based on a percentage of the total federal assistance provided for disaster response and recovery, meaning larger disasters generate more HMGP funding that is awarded to California. Projects eligible for HMGP funds include property buyouts, infrastructure improvements, wildfire mitigation efforts, and other community resilience initiatives that align with FEMA’s goal of minimizing the impact of future disasters on people and property.

All sub-applications must be eligible in the FEMA HMA Program guidance, be technicallyfeasible, cost-effective, and pass an environmental and historic preservation (EHP) review.

Cal OES and FEMA work with sub-applicants (local governments, state agencies, federallyrecognized tribal nations, some private non-profits and special districts) to go through this application process.

Cal OES has 12-months, with additional time extensions available, to identify interested communities, scope eligible, complete sub-applications, and submit them to the FEMA Region IX office located in Oakland, California. During this 12-month period, FEMA Region IX will provide estimated amounts of funding available in the HMGP for that disaster declaration at 30-day, 6-month, and 12-month timelines. This funding amount is determined by 20% of the total amount of PA damages and IA claims submitted to FEMA for reimbursement by these pre-determined time increments.
2023 saw three federally-declared disaster declarations for California, bringing three separate allocations of HMGP:

Severe atmospheric rivers in January and March brought widespread flooding, infrastructure damage, and landslides across California, prompting DR-4683 (Attachment B) and DR-4699 (Attachment A) to be declared by the President several federal declarations to facilitate funding for response and rebuilding efforts.

Hurricane Hilary in July caused damage in Southern California, resulting in DR4750 (Attachment C).

In early 2024, California continued to experience severe weather impacts, with another series of two major disaster declarations from events in Southern California, DR-4758 (Attachment D) and DR-4769 (Attachment E) from January and March storms/flooding, respectively.
703
RPV leveraged leftover funds from DR-4699 (Attachment A) after several sub-applicants unexpectedly withdrew from the program. Although there are three open HMGP application periods, communities have submitted applications exceeding the amount of funding available, leaving no current HMGP opportunities for the City of Rolling Hills to participate. However, there is a potential opportunity if the President declares the large wildfires in summer 2024 Borel and Park Fires, a major disaster declaration.

APPLICATIONS
Cal OES is currently accepting applications for future Presidentially-Declared Disasters, recognizing that gathering the necessary documentation and conducting analyses requires significant time. A critical element of the application process is completing a benefit-cost analysis to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of proposed mitigation efforts. This process requires a lot of technical documentation, which often takes more than the 12-month application timeframe allowed by FEMA for the HMGP.

Staff are seeking direction from the City Council to authorize collaboration with the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES). This collaboration would involve the following key actions:

This evening, staff will present an overview of RPV’s program as a potential model for hazard mitigation strategies in the Rolling Hills community. Following the presentation, staff seek direction from the City Council on the following actions:

1. Authorize staff to arrange a meeting with Cal OES for a site visit to the City of Rolling Hills and attend a future City Council meeting; and

2. Direct staff to begin coordinating with Cal OES specifically to apply for available grant programs and return to the Council with updates and any required approvals.

Staff will report back to the City Council on the next steps and whether to proceed with a particular grant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A DR-4699-CA Public Notice.pdf
Attachment B DR-4683-CA Public Notice.pdf
Attachment C 4750-DR-CA Public Notice.pdf
Attachment D 4758-DR-CA Initial Notice.pdf
Attachment E 4769-DR-CA Initial Notice.pdf
714
Apply for Assistance
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know DR-4699-CA Public Notice 001
English
Notice Date April 4, 2023
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice to the public of its intent to provide financial assistance to the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations under major disaster declaration FEMA-4699-DR-CA. This notice applies to the Individual Assistance (IA), Public Assistance (PA), and Hazard Mitigation Grant (HMGP) programs implemented under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207. This public notice concerns activities that may affect historic properties, activities that are located in or affect wetland areas and the 100-year floodplain, and may involve critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. Such activities may adversely affect the historic property, floodplain or wetland, or may result in continuing vulnerability to flood damage.

I. Public Notice – Major Disaster Declaration FEMA-4699-DR-CA and Overview of Authorized Assistance
The President declared a major disaster for the State of California on April 3, 2023, as a result of the severe winter storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides, and mudslides that began on February 21, 2023 and are continuing, pursuant to his authority 725
under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93- 288 (1974) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 5121 et seq.) (Stafford Act).

This declaration, numbered FEMA-4699-DR-CA, has authorized Individual Assistance (assistance to individuals and households) for Kern, Mariposa, Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Tulare, and Tuolumne Counties.

The following counties have been authorized for Public Assistance (Assistance for emergency work and the repair or replacement of disaster-damaged facilities): Calaveras, Los Angeles, Monterey, and Tulare Counties.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (assistance for actions taken to prevent or reduce long term risk to life and property from natural hazards) is available statewide.

Additional counties may be designated at a later date if requested by the state and warranted by the results of further damage assessments.

Individual Assistance is authorized by Section 408 of the Stafford Act. FEMA may provide IA program funding for disaster-related emergency housing. These actions may adversely affect a floodplain/wetland, or may result in continuing vulnerability to floods. These actions may include repair, restoration or construction of housing or private bridges, purchase and placement of travel trailers or manufactured housing units, or repair of structures as minimum protective measures. This will be the only public notice concerning these actions.

The Public Assistance Program is authorized by Sections 403, 406, and 407 of the Stafford Act. FEMA may provide financial assistance under the Public Assistance Program for the State of
California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to perform debris removal and emergency protective measures.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is authorized by Section 404 of the Stafford Act.

Under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, FEMA may provide financial assistance for the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to implement mitigation measures to reduce the risk of life and property from future disasters during the recovery from the major disaster. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.
736
II. Public Notice – Financial Assistance for Activities that Affect Historic Properties or Located in or that Affect Wetlands Areas or Floodplains Some of the activities for which FEMA provides financial assistance under the Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs may affect historic properties, may be located in or affect wetland areas or the 100-year floodplain, and may involve critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. In accordance with all requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all federal actions must be reviewed and evaluated for feasible alternatives. FEMA must also comply with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management; Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands; the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-655 (1966) (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq.) (NHPA); and the implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R. pt. 9 and 36 C.F.R. pt. 800. The executive orders, NHPA, and regulations require FEMA to provide public notice for certain activities as part of approving the award of financial assistance for specific projects.

A. Federal Actions in or Affecting Floodplains and Wetlands FEMA has determined for certain types of facilities there are normally no alternatives to restoration in the floodplain or wetland. These are facilities meeting all of the following criteria: 1) FEMA’s estimate of the cost of repairs is less than 50% of the cost to replace the entire facility and is less than $100,000; 2) the facility is not located in a floodway; 3) the facility has not sustained major structural damage in a previous Presidentially declared flooding disaster or emergency; and 4) the facility is not critical (e.g., the facility is not a hospital, generating plant, emergency operations center, or a facility containing dangerous materials). FEMA intends to provide assistance for the restoration of these facilities to their pre-disaster condition, except certain measures to mitigate the effect of future flooding or other hazards may be included in the work. For example, a bridge or culvert restoration may include a larger waterway opening to decrease the risk of future washouts.

For routine activities, this will be the only public notice provided. Other activities and those involving facilities not meeting the four criteria are required to undergo more detailed review, including the study of alternate locations. Subsequent public notices regarding such projects will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

In many cases, an applicant may have started facility restoration before federal involvement. Even if the facility must undergo detailed review and analysis of alternate 747
locations, FEMA will
fund eligible restoration at the original location if the facility is functionally dependent on its floodplain location (e.g., bridges and flood control facilities), or the project facilitates an open space use, or the facility is an integral part of a larger network which is impractical or uneconomical to relocate, such as a road. In such cases, FEMA must also examine the possible effects of not restoring the facility, minimizing floodplain or wetland impacts, and determining both an overriding public need for the facility clearly outweighs the Executive Order requirements to avoid the floodplain or wetland, and the site selected is the only practicable alternative. The State and local officials will confirm to FEMA the proposed actions comply with all applicable federal, state, and local floodplain management and wetland protection requirements.

The Public Assistance (PA) Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) partial implementation policy, effective for all major disasters declared on or after June 3, 2022, applies to PA projects in the 1% annual chance floodplain (1% and 0.2% annual chance floodplains for critical actions) involving new construction of structures, structures that have a substantial damage determination, or structures that require substantial improvement. The policy applies regardless of the cause of damage.

The Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) FFRMS partial implementation policy applies to non-critical actions involving structure elevation, dry floodproofing, and mitigation reconstruction in the 1% annual chance floodplain. For all FEMA programs and project types, if a state, local, tribal, or territorial government has its own higher elevation standard, FEMA requires use of the higher standard. FEMA program policies also reference additional consensus codes and standards, such as ASCE-24-14, that incorporate additional elevation requirements beyond the base flood elevation.

B. Federal Actions Affecting Historic Properties
Section 106 of the NHPA requires FEMA to consider the effects of its activities (known as undertakings) on any historic property and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) an opportunity to comment on such projects before the expenditure of any federal funds. An Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, or Hazard Mitigation Grant Program activity is an “undertaking” for the purposes of the NHPA, and a historic property is any property which is included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). For historic properties which will not be adversely affected by FEMA’s undertaking, this will be the only public notice. FEMA may provide additional public notices if a proposed FEMA undertaking would adversely affect a historic property.
758
III. Further Information or Comment
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects the civil rights of persons with disabilities. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal contractors, and by recipients of federal financial assistance. Any recipient or subrecipient of federal funds is required to make their programs accessible to individuals with disabilities. Its protections apply to all programs and businesses receiving any federal funds. This applies to all elements of physical/architectural, programmatic and communication accessibility in all services and activities conducted by or funded by FEMA. FEMA intends to comply with the Rehabilitation Act in all federally conducted and assisted programs in alignment with the principals of whole community inclusion and universal accessibility.

Executive Orders 13985 and 14008 further address the need to achieve environmental justice and equity across the federal government. The issuance of the new executive orders more than 20 years after Executive Order 12898 was signed indicates the administration’s directive to federal agencies to renew their energy, effort, resources, and attention to environmental justice. FEMA is working with applicants/sub-applicants to identify communities with Environmental Justice concerns and provide an avenue for local groups and non-profits with an Environmental Justice mission to self-identify so FEMA Programs can start to work with them on specific projects from the beginning of the application process.

FEMA also intends to provide HMGP funding to the State of California to mitigate future disaster damages. These projects may include construction of new facilities, modification of existing, undamaged facilities, relocation of facilities out of floodplains, demolition of structures, or other types of projects to mitigate future disaster damages. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

This will be the only public notice regarding the actions described above for which FEMA may provide financial assistance under the Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs. Interested persons may obtain information about these actions or a specific project by writing to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region RIX Office, Acting Regional Environmental Officer, Scott Fletcher, 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94607. All comments concerning this public notice must be submitted in writing to the Region RIX Office within 30 days of its publication. 769
Disasters & Assistance
Grants
Floods & Maps
Emergency Management
About
Work With Us
National
Terrorism
Advisory
System
Last updated April 5, 2023
Return to top
Contact FEMA
FEMA.gov
An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Accessibility
Accountability
Careers
Civil Rights
Contact Us
FOIA
Glossary
No FEAR Act
Plug-Ins
Privacy
1077
Report Disaster Fraud
Website Information
DHS.gov
USA.gov
Inspector General
1178
Apply for Assistance
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know DR-4683-CA Public Notice 001
English
Notice Date January 27, 2023
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice to the public of its intent to provide financial assistance to the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations under major disaster declaration FEMA-4683-DR-CA. This notice applies to the Individual Assistance (IA), Public Assistance (PA), and Hazard Mitigation Grant (HMGP) programs implemented under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207. This public notice concerns activities that may affect historic properties, activities that are located in or affect wetland areas and the 100-year floodplain, and may involve critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. Such activities may adversely affect the historic property, floodplain or wetland, or may result in continuing vulnerability to flood damage.

I. Public Notice – Major Disaster Declaration FEMA-4683-DR-CA and Overview of Authorized Assistance
The President declared a major disaster for the State of California on January 14, 2023, and amended January 17, 2023, as a result of the severe winter storms, flooding, landslides, and mudslides that began on December 27, 2022 and are continuing, pursuant to his authority under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 1279
Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93-288 (1974) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 5121 et seq.) (Stafford Act).

This declaration, numbered FEMA-4683-DR-CA, has authorized Individual Assistance for Calaveras, Merced, Monterey, Sacramento, San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz Counties; and reimbursement through the Public Assistance Program, including direct federal assistance, for emergency work (Categories A-B) for Merced, Monterey, Sacramento, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz Counties.

The following counties have been designated as eligible for Public Assistance, Category C through G for permanent work: Merced, Monterey, Sacramento, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz Counties.

The following counties have been designated as eligible for Public Assistance: San Benito, Tulare, and Ventura Counties.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is available statewide. Additional counties may be designated at a later date.

Amendment No. 1, issued January 17, 2023, to the notice of major disaster declaration for the state of California (FEMA DR-4683-CA), dated January 14, 2023, identified the following counties as eligible for Individual Assistance: Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties, and identified the following counties as eligible for debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B), including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program: Monterey, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties.

Amendment No. 2 issued January 18, 2023, to the notice of major disaster declaration for the state of California (FEMA DR-4683-CA), dated January 14, 2023, identified the following county as eligible for Individual Assistance: San Joaquin County.

Amendment No. 3 issued January 23, 2023, to the notice of major disaster declaration for the state of California (FEMA DR-4683-CA), dated January 14, 2023, identified the following county as eligible for Individual Assistance: Calaveras County.

Amendment No. 4 issued January 26, 2023, to the notice of major disaster declaration for the state of California (FEMA DR-4683-CA), dated January 14, 2023, identified the following county as eligible for Individual Assistance: San Mateo County. The following counties have also been identified as eligible for Public Assistance, Category C through G 1380
for permanent work: Merced, Monterey, Sacramento, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz Counties (already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A and B] including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program). Additionally, the following counties have been identified as eligible for Public Assistance: San Benito, Tulare, and Ventura Counties.

Individual Assistance is authorized by Section 408 of the Stafford Act. FEMA may provide IA program funding for disaster-related emergency housing. These actions may adversely affect a floodplain/wetland, or may result in continuing vulnerability to floods. These actions may include repair, restoration or construction of housing or private bridges, purchase and placement of travel trailers or manufactured housing units, or repair of structures as minimum protective measures. This will be the only public notice concerning these actions.

The Public Assistance Program is authorized by Sections 403, 406, and 407 of the Stafford Act. FEMA may provide financial assistance under the Public Assistance Program for the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to perform debris removal and emergency protective measures.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is authorized by Section 404 of the Stafford Act.

Under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, FEMA may provide financial assistance for the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to implement mitigation measures to reduce the risk of life and property from future disasters during the recovery from the major disaster. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

II. Public Notice – Financial Assistance for Activities that Affect Historic Properties or Located in or that Affect Wetlands Areas or Floodplains Some of the activities for which FEMA provides financial assistance under the Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs may affect historic properties, may be located in or affect wetland areas or the 100-year floodplain, and may involve critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. In accordance with all requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all federal actions must be reviewed and evaluated for feasible alternatives. FEMA must also comply with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management; Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands; the National Historic Preservation
1481
Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-655 (1966) (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq.) (NHPA); and the implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R. pt. 9 and 36 C.F.R. pt. 800. The executive orders, NHPA, and regulations require FEMA to provide public notice for certain activities as part of approving the award of financial assistance for specific projects.

A. Federal Actions in or Affecting Floodplains and Wetlands FEMA has determined for certain types of facilities there are normally no alternatives to restoration in the floodplain or wetland. These are facilities meeting all of the following criteria:
1) FEMA’s estimate of the cost of repairs is less than 50% of the cost to replace the entire facility and is less than $100,000; 2) the facility is not located in a floodway; 3) the facility has not sustained major structural damage in a previous Presidentially declared flooding disaster or emergency; and 4) the facility is not critical (e.g., the facility is not a hospital, generating plant, emergency operations center, or a facility containing dangerous materials). FEMA intends to provide assistance for the restoration of these facilities to their pre-disaster condition, except certain measures to mitigate the effect of future flooding or other hazards may be included in the work. For example, a bridge or culvert restoration may include a larger waterway opening to decrease the risk of future washouts.

For routine activities, this will be the only public notice provided. Other activities and those involving facilities not meeting the four criteria are required to undergo more detailed review, including the study of alternate locations. Subsequent public notices regarding such projects will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

In many cases, an applicant may have started facility restoration before federal involvement. Even if the facility must undergo detailed review and analysis of alternate locations, FEMA will fund eligible restoration at the original location if the facility is functionally dependent on its floodplain location (e.g., bridges and flood control facilities), or the project facilitates an open space use, or the facility is an integral part of a larger network which is impractical or uneconomical to relocate, such as a road. In such cases, FEMA must also examine the possible effects of not restoring the facility, minimizing floodplain or wetland impacts, and determining both an overriding public need for the facility clearly outweighs the Executive Order requirements to avoid the floodplain or wetland, and the site selected is the only practicable alternative. The State 1582
and local officials will confirm to FEMA the proposed actions comply with all applicable federal, state, and local floodplain management and wetland protection requirements.

The Public Assistance (PA) Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) partial implementation policy, effective for all major disasters declared on or after June 3, 2022, applies to PA projects in the 1% annual chance floodplain (1% and 0.2% annual chance floodplains for critical actions) involving new construction of structures, structures that have a substantial damage determination, or structures that require substantial improvement. The policy applies regardless of the cause of damage.

The Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) FFRMS partial implementation policy applies to non- critical actions involving structure elevation, dry floodproofing, and mitigation reconstruction in
the 1% annual chance floodplain. For all FEMA programs and project types, if a state, local, tribal, or territorial government has its own higher elevation standard, FEMA requires use of the higher standard. FEMA program policies also reference additional consensus codes and standards, such as ASCE-24-14, that incorporate additional elevation requirements beyond the base flood elevation.

B. Federal Actions Affecting Historic Properties
Section 106 of the NHPA requires FEMA to consider the effects of its activities (known as undertakings) on any historic property and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) an opportunity to comment on such projects before the expenditure of any federal funds. An Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, or Hazard Mitigation Grant Program activity is an “undertaking” for the purposes of the NHPA, and a historic property is any property which is included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). For historic properties which will not be adversely affected by FEMA’s undertaking, this will be the only public notice. FEMA may provide additional public notices if a proposed FEMA undertaking would adversely affect a historic property.

III. Further Information or Comment
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects the civil rights of persons with disabilities. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal contractors, and by recipients of federal financial assistance. Any recipient or subrecipient of federal funds is required to make their programs accessible to individuals 1683
with disabilities. Its protections apply to all programs and businesses receiving any federal funds. This applies to all elements of physical/architectural, programmatic and communication accessibility in all services and activities conducted by or funded by FEMA. FEMA intends to comply with the Rehabilitation Act in all federally conducted and assisted programs in alignment with the principals of whole community inclusion and universal accessibility.

Executive Orders 13985 and 14008 further address the need to achieve environmental justice and equity across the federal government. The issuance of the new executive orders more than 20 years after Executive Order 12898 was signed indicates the administration’s directive to federal agencies to renew their energy, effort, resources, and attention to environmental justice. FEMA is working with applicants/sub-applicants to identify communities with Environmental Justice concerns and provide an avenue for local groups and non-profits with an Environmental Justice mission to self-identify so FEMA Programs can start to work with them on specific projects from the beginning of the application process.

FEMA also intends to provide HMGP funding to the State of California to mitigate future disaster damages. These projects may include construction of new facilities, modification of existing, undamaged facilities, relocation of facilities out of floodplains, demolition of structures, or other types of projects to mitigate future disaster damages. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

This will be the only public notice regarding the actions described above for which FEMA may provide financial assistance under the Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs. Interested persons may obtain information about these actions or a specific project by writing to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region RIX Office, Regional Environmental Officer, Kenneth Sessa, 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94607. All comments concerning this public notice must be submitted in writing to the Region RIX Office within 30 days of its publication.

Last updated February 3, 2023
1784
Disasters & Assistance
Grants
Floods & Maps
Emergency Management
About
Work With Us
National
Terrorism
Advisory
System
Return to top
Contact FEMA
FEMA.gov
An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Accessibility
Accountability
Careers
Civil Rights
Contact Us
FOIA
Glossary
No FEAR Act
Plug-Ins
Privacy
Report Disaster Fraud
Website Information
DHS.gov
USA.gov
Inspector General
1885
Apply for Assistance
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know 4750-DR-CA Public Notice 001
English Español Tagalog 简体中文
Notice Date December 27, 2023
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice to the public of its intent to provide financial assistance to the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations under major disaster declaration FEMA-4750-DR-CA. This notice applies to the Public Assistance (PA) and Hazard Mitigation Grant (HMGP) programs implemented under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5207. This public notice concerns activities that may affect historic properties, activities that are in or affect wetland areas or the 100-year floodplain, and critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. Such activities may adversely affect an historic property, floodplain, or wetland, or may result in continuing vulnerability to flood damage.

I. Public Notice – Major Disaster Declaration FEMA-4750-DR-CA and Overview of Authorized Assistance
The President declared a major disaster for the State of California on November 21, 2023, as a result of flooding resulting from Tropical Storm Hillary that began on August 19, 2023, and ended on August 21, 2023, pursuant to his authority under the Robert T. 1986
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Pub. L. No. 93-288 (1974) (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 5121 et seq.) (Stafford Act).

This declaration has designated as eligible for Public Assistance, Categories A and B emergency work, and C thru G permanent work, for the following Counties: Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Riverside, and Siskiyou Counties. Additional counties may be designated at a later date.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is available statewide.

The Public Assistance Program is authorized by Sections 403, 406, and 407 of the Stafford Act. FEMA may provide financial assistance under the Public Assistance Program for the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to perform debris removal and emergency protective measures.

The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program is authorized by Section 404 of the Stafford Act.

Under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, FEMA may provide financial assistance for the State of California, local and Indian tribal governments, and private nonprofit organizations to implement mitigation measures to reduce the risk of life and property from future disasters during the recovery from the major disaster. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published, if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

II. Public Notice – Financial Assistance for Activities that Affect Historic Properties or Located in or that Affect Wetlands Areas or Floodplains Some of the activities for which FEMA provides financial assistance under the Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Grant Programs may affect historic properties, may be in or affect wetland areas or the 100-year floodplain, and may involve critical actions within the 500-year floodplain. In accordance with all requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), all federal actions must be reviewed and evaluated for feasible alternatives. FEMA must also comply with Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management; Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands; the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-655 (1966) (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq.) (NHPA); and the implementing regulations at 44 C.F.R. pt. 9 and 36 C.F.R. pt. 800. The executive orders, NHPA, and regulations require FEMA to provide public notice for certain activities as part of approving the award of financial assistance for specific projects.
2087
A. Federal Actions in or Affecting Floodplains and Wetlands FEMA has determined that for certain types of facilities there are normally no alternatives to restoration in the floodplain/wetland. These are facilities that meet all of the following criteria: 1) FEMA’s estimate of the cost of repairs is less than 50-percent of the cost to replace the entire facility, and is less than $100,000; 2) the facility is not located in a floodway; 3) the facility has not sustained major structural damage in a previous presidentially declared flooding disaster or emergency; and 4) the facility is not critical (e.g., the facility is not a hospital, generating plant, emergency operations center, or a facility that contains dangerous materials). FEMA intends to provide assistance for the restoration of these facilities to their pre-disaster condition, except that certain measures to mitigate the effects of future flooding or other hazards may be included in the work.

For example, a bridge or culvert restoration may include a larger waterway opening to decrease the risk of future washouts.

For routine activities, this will be the only public notice provided. Other activities and those involving facilities that do not meet the four criteria are required to undergo more detailed review, including study of alternate locations. Subsequent public notices regarding such projects will be published, if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

In many cases, an applicant may have started facility restoration before federal involvement. Even if the facility must undergo detailed review and analysis of alternate locations, FEMA will fund eligible restoration at the original location if the facility is functionally dependent on its floodplain location (e.g., bridges and piers), or the project facilitates an open space use, or the facility is an integral part of a larger network that is impractical or uneconomical to relocate, such as a road. In such cases, FEMA must also examine the possible effects of not restoring the facility, minimize floodplain/wetland impacts, and determine both that an overriding public need for the facility clearly outweighs the Executive Order requirements to avoid the floodplain/wetland, and that the site is the only practicable alternative. The State of California and local officials will confirm to FEMA that proposed actions comply with all applicable state and local floodplain management and wetland protection requirements.

The Public Assistance (PA) Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) partial implementation policy, effective for all major disasters declared on or after June 3, 2022, applies to PA projects in the 1% annual chance floodplain (1% and 0.2% annual chance floodplains for critical actions) involving new construction of structures, structures that 2188
have a substantial damage determination, or structures that require substantial improvement. The policy applies regardless of the cause of damage.

The Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) FFRMS partial implementation policy applies to non-critical actions involving structure elevation, dry floodproofing, and mitigation reconstruction in the 1% annual chance floodplain. For all FEMA programs and project types, if a state, local, tribal, or territorial government has its own higher elevation standard, FEMA requires use of the higher standard. FEMA program policies also reference additional consensus codes and standards, such as ASCE-24-14, that incorporate additional elevation requirements beyond the base flood elevation.

B. Federal Actions Affecting Historic Properties
Section 106 of the NHPA requires FEMA to consider the effects of its activities (known as undertakings) on any historic property and to afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) an opportunity to comment on such projects before the expenditure of any federal funds. A Public Assistance or Hazard Mitigation Grant Program activity is an “undertaking” for the purposes of the NHPA, and a historic property is any property which is included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). For historic properties which will not be adversely affected by FEMA’s undertaking, this will be the only public notice. FEMA may provide additional public notices if a proposed FEMA undertaking would adversely affect a historic property.

III. Further Information or Comment
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects the civil rights of persons with disabilities. It prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by the federal government, federal contractors, and by recipients of federal financial assistance. Any recipient or subrecipient of federal funds is required to make their programs accessible to individuals with disabilities. Its protections apply to all programs and businesses receiving any federal funds. This applies to all elements of physical/architectural, programmatic and communication accessibility in all services and activities conducted by or funded by FEMA. FEMA intends to comply with the Rehabilitation Act in all federally conducted and assisted programs in alignment with the principals of whole community inclusion and universal accessibility.

Executive Orders 13985 and 14008 further address the need to achieve environmental justice and equity across the federal government. The issuance of the new executive orders more than 20 years after Executive Order 12898 was signed indicates the 2289
Disasters & Assistance
Grants
Floods & Maps
Emergency Management
administration’s directive to federal agencies to renew their energy, effort, resources, and attention to environmental justice. FEMA is working with applicants/sub-applicants to identify communities with Environmental Justice concerns and provide an avenue for local groups and non-profits with an Environmental Justice mission to self-identify so FEMA Programs can start to work with them on specific projects from the beginning of the application process.

FEMA also intends to provide HMGP funding to the State of California to mitigate future disaster damages. These projects may include construction of new facilities, modification of existing, undamaged facilities, relocation of facilities out of floodplains, demolition of structures, or other types of projects to mitigate future disaster damages. In the course of developing project proposals, subsequent public notices will be published, if necessary, as more specific information becomes available.

As noted, this may be the only public notice regarding the above-described actions under the PA and HMGP programs. Interested persons may obtain information about these actions or a specific project by writing to the FEMA Region IX office at FEMA-RIX-EHP[email protected] or by mail to the Regional Environmental Officer, 111 Broadway, Suite 1200, Oakland, CA 94607-4052 at either address within 30 days of the date of this notice.

Last updated December 27, 2023
Return to top
2390
About
Work With Us
National
Terrorism
Advisory
System
Contact FEMA
FEMA.gov
An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Accessibility
Accountability
Careers
Civil Rights
Contact Us
FOIA
Glossary
No FEAR Act
Plug-Ins
Privacy
Report Disaster Fraud
Website Information
DHS.gov
USA.gov
Inspector General
2491
Apply for Assistance
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know 4758-DR-CA Initial Notice
English
Notice Date February 19, 2024
Billing Code 9111-23-P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4758-DR]
[Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]
California; Major Disaster and Related Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4758-DR), dated February 19, 2024, and related determinations.

DATE: The declaration was issued February 19, 2024.
2592
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated February 19, 2024, the President issued a major disaster declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the “Stafford Act”), as follows:

I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State of California resulting from a severe storm and flooding during the period of January 21 to January 23, 2024, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the “Stafford Act”). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of California.

In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses.

You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance in the designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance under section 408 will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.

Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.

The time period prescribed for the implementation of section 310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed six months after the date of this declaration. 2693
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, N. Allison Pfaendler, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.

The following areas of the State of California have been designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

San Diego County for Individual Assistance.

All areas within the State of California are eligible for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance - Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households - Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. /s/
_______________________________________
Deanne Criswell,
Administrator,
2794
Disasters & Assistance
Grants
Floods & Maps
Emergency Management
About
Work With Us
Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Last updated February 29, 2024
Return to top
Contact FEMA
2895
National
Terrorism
Advisory
System
FEMA.gov
An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Accessibility
Accountability
Careers
Civil Rights
Contact Us
FOIA
Glossary
No FEAR Act
Plug-Ins
Privacy
Report Disaster Fraud
Website Information
DHS.gov
USA.gov
Inspector General
2996
Apply for Assistance
An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know 4769-DR-CA Initial Notice
English
Notice Date April 13, 2024
Billing Code 9111-23-P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4769-DR]
[Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]
California; Major Disaster and Related Determinations
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (FEMA-4769-DR), dated April 13, 2024, and related determinations.

DATE: The declaration was issued April 13, 2024.
3097
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated April 13, 2024, the President issued a major disaster declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the “Stafford Act”), as follows:

I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State of California resulting from severe winter storms, tornadoes, flooding, landslides, and mudslides during the period of January 31 to February 9, 2024, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the “Stafford Act”). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of California.

In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses.

You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.

Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Andrew F. Grant, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.

The following areas of the State of California have been designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

Butte, Glenn, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Sutter, and Ventura Counties for Public Assistance.
3198
Disasters & Assistance
Grants
All areas within the State of California are eligible for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance - Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households - Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. /s/
_______________________________________
Deanne Criswell,
Administrator,
Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Last updated April 22, 2024
Return to top
3299
Floods & Maps
Emergency Management
About
Work With Us
National
Terrorism
Advisory
System
Contact FEMA
FEMA.gov
An official website of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Accessibility
Accountability
Careers
Civil Rights
Contact Us
FOIA
Glossary
No FEAR Act
Plug-Ins
Privacy
Report Disaster Fraud
Website Information
DHS.gov
USA.gov
Inspector General
10033
Agenda Item No.: 4.B
Mtg. Date: 12/10/2024
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO

CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE A PRESENTATION OVERVIEW FROM THE

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
(CAL OES) REGARDING FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

AGENCY (FEMA) AND CAL OES HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM
DATE: December 10, 2024
BACKGROUND:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file.

ATTACHMENTS:

CL_AGN_241210_CalOES_StateHMP_Presentation.pdf
1011
California Office of Emergency Services
State Hazard Mitigation Program
Robyn Fennig, CFM
https://www.caloes.ca.gov/office-of-the-director/operations/recovery-directorate/hazard-mitigation/ December 10, 2024
1022
FEMA’s Definition of Hazard Mitigation
Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people, property and the environment from natural hazards and their effects.
1033
Mitigation Program
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 3
• Planning (state and local) informs development and selection of projects • Technical assistance provides to support community subapplications • Grants division manages FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants • Quality Assurance Division provides support to monitor and measure effectiveness of program
• Coordination with other federal, state, local and non-profit partners o FEMA Region IX
o California Department of Water Resources (DWR)
o California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) o California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) o US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
1044
State Hazard Mitigation Plan
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 4
• Sets statewide mitigation priorities and documents
statewide program efforts
• Provides the foundation for strategies that should
be considered in the Local Mitigation Plans
(LHMPs)
• Outlines actions to be implemented upon adoption
• State agencies are covered by the SHMP for the
purposes of Mitigation Grant Funding
• Approved August 30, 2023
1055
Hazard Mitigation Assistance Funding Authorization
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 5
• Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP): Funding for California hazard mitigation actions. Available after federal major disaster declarations. Ongoing acceptance of proposals (Notices of Interest or NOIs).
• Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC): Annual, nationally-competitive program funding mitigation actions. Process starts each year in fall. • Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA): Annual, nationally-competitive program funding mitigation actions that protect properties insured by National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Process starts each year in fall.
• FMA Swift Current: provides funding to mitigate buildings insured through the National Flood Insurance Program after a major disaster declaration following a flood-related disaster event to reduce risk against future flood damage.
• Legislative Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program (LPDM): Annual earmark program overseen by the DHS Appropriations Committee
• Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dam (HHPD) Grant Program: provides technical, planning, design, and construction assistance in the form of grants for rehabilitation of eligible high hazard potential dam in jurisdictions that address dam hazards in their LHMPs (managed by DWR) 1066 Eligible Subapplicant Entities
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 6
• State Agencies
• Local Governments: Counties, Cities, Towns, etc.
• Special Districts
• Federally Recognized Tribes
• Private Nonprofit Organizations (PNPs) (not eligible for BRIC) • The entity must have a FEMA-approved and locally adopted LHMP • PNPs in HMGP are exempt from this requirement
1077
Application Requirements (FEMA)
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program| 7
• Must have a FEMA-approved and locally-adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Participating in a multijurisdictional process with Rolling Hills Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, and two geologic hazard abatement districts (Klondike Canyon and Albalone Cove) – grant awarded kickoff took place October 2024
• Would not be eligible for a grant until the planning process is complete and it’s been adopted • Long-term, standalone solution
• Cost-effective using FEMA’s Benefit Cost Analysis toolkit; benefit cost ratio 1.0 or greater • 48 month period of performance
• 25% non-federal cost share match required
• No work can begin until it’s approved by FEMA
• City of Rolling Hills has had several HMGP subgrants
• DR-4382 – wildfire mitigation project to underground power lines in partnership with SoCal Edison • DR-4382 – vegetative management/fuel break/erosion control • DR-4344 – wildfire/seismic mitigation project to underground power lines 1088
Eligible Activities
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 8
• Planning Grants: deliverable is a FEMA-approved LHMP (new or update) • Planning-related activity grants aim to integrate LHMPs to other planning mechanisms, outreach/education for your LHMP or floodplain management
• Project scoping should be used when the mitigation problem and solution are not known, and you need to evaluate a potential intervention (i.e. the proposed activity results in a resource, strategy, or tangible mitigation product that will reduce or eliminate risk and damage from future flooding and increase resilience)
• Construction projects: structural mitigation (A/D, elevation, reconstruction), wildfire mitigation, nature-based solutions. • Nature-based solutions include, but are not limited to, restoration of grasslands, rivers, floodplains, wetlands, dunes, and reefs; living shorelines; soil stabilization; aquiver storage and recovery; bioretention systems
1099
Submitting a Subgrant – Cal OES Process
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program| 9
• Request a Project Scoping Call
• Submit a Notice of Interest (NOI) – accepted anytime, priority given to subapplicants who submit by deadlines for specific NOFOs in online system • NOI reviewed by Cal OES, subapplicants with eligible activities will be invited to attend a subapplication development webinar/workshops • Subapplication submitted to Cal OES in our online system • Cal OES reviews subapplications
• Request for Information (RFI)
• Cal OES submits all subapplications to FEMA
• FEMA may have additional RFIs
11010
Cal OES Assistance – Technical Assistance
Additional Points:
 Ensure detailed Scope of Work
(SoW)
• Location
• Purpose
• Approach
• Feasibility
• Expected outcomes
• Benefits of the activity
 Cost estimate and narrative
describing the anticipated costs
 Data collection for costeffectiveness screening
 A FEMA credible BCA is key. If the
project is preliminary, phase the
project and include a rerun of the
BCA as a Phase I deliverable
Identification of
the Problem
• Problem statement
and history of hazards
• What is the hazard
and risk?
• How long has it been
occurring?
• What are the
damages and loss of
function/service?
• Note quantitative and
qualitative losses
• Future conditions (SLR,
climate impacts,
demographic
changes, etc.)
• How is climate
change worsening the
problem?
Potential
Projects/Solutions
• Include:
• Hazard Mitigation
Planning
• Planning Studies
• Feasibility Studies
• Capital Project Plans
• New budgetary
need requests
• Comprehensive
stakeholder
engagement for
project identification
• Do you know if solution
is feasible?
• What may be the
challenges with
implementation?
Technical
Assistance (TA)
• Assistance with project
scoping
• How to quickly identify
projects that may be
eligible, feasibility,
cost-effective, and
competitive
• Goal is to identify
projects that will be
competitive with
FEMA’s priorities for

BRIC & FMA
• Focus time and
resources on good,
fundable projects
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program| 10
11111
BRIC Funding by Year
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program | 11
$95,448,982.00
$180,180,256.00
$501,828,488.00
$238,226,147.00
$404,551,018.00
$819,819,744.00
$1,798,171,512.00
$761,773,853.00
BRIC 2020
BRIC 2021
BRIC 2022
BRIC 2023
Funding Available by Year
California Rest of Nation
11212
California BRIC History
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program| 12
CA BRIC 2021 (Fed Share)
$66,274,460
$180,180,256
CA BRIC 2023 (Fed Share)
$338,363,247
$238,226,147
CA BRIC 2022 (Fed Share)
$501,828,488
CA BRIC 2020 (Fed Share)
$377,721,964
$95,448,982
BRIC 2021 (Competitive)
 Total Funding Available:
$1 billion
 California Selected:
$180 million (18%)
 Projects Submitted: 11
 Projects Selected: 9
BRIC 2020 (Competitive)
 Total Funding Available:
$500 million
 California Selected:
$95.5 million (19.1%)
 Projects Submitted: 26
 Projects Selected: 4
BRIC 2023 (Competitive)
 Total Funding Available:
$1 billion
 California Selected:
$238 million (24%)
 Projects Submitted: 24
 Projects Selected: 13
BRIC 2022 (Competitive)
 Total Funding Available:
$2.3 billion
 California Selected:
$501.8 million (21.8%)
 Projects Submitted: 19
 Projects Selected: 19
Not Selected Selected
11313
Next Steps
Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Program| 13
• Submitting a Notice of Interest
• Discuss what data is available, specifically for the BCA • Outline what goes into a budget, scope of work, and schedule • Complete the local planning process – adopt the plan! • Recommend meeting with other communities
11414
Thank you!
11515
116
117
118
119
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP)
DR-4856 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)
HMA Grant Opportunities | California
Governor's Office of Emergency Services April 23, 2025
120
DR-4856 Timeline
HMGP Overview / Eligibility
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
Next Steps
Q&A
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 2
121
Cal OES DR-4856 HMGP Timeline
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 3
2025

APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
4/2: Cal OES
releases the DR4856 HMGP NOFO
5/29: Notice of
Interest (NOIs) are
due to Cal OES via
the Engage Portal.

Once the NOI is
approved, the
subapplication is
available for
content /
development.

Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
9/15:

Subapplications
are due to Cal OES
via the Engage
Portal (Cal OES RFIs
to follow post
subapplication
submission)
Critical note: Cal OES decision / FEMA grant award will happen post-September 2025. It is likely that FEMA grant awards for Advance Assistance and mitigation projects may not occur until 2027 / 2028. Only non-ground disturbing pre-award work can begin before the grant award (needs to be clearly identified in the subapplication). This work is at risk (only reimbursed if the subapplication is funded / procured properly) and no construction / groundbreaking activities are allowed before grant award. Eligible pre-award costs must have occurred after the disaster declaration date - 1/8/25. *Rolling HMGP NOIs / subapplications are transferred
to DR-4856 (next opportunity)
122
Cal OES DR-4856 HMGP Timeline (con’t)
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 4
2025

APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
4/2: Cal OES
releases the DR4856 HMGP NOFO
- Subapplicant should
identify potential
activities for NOI
development
- Project scoping call
to review potential
activities with Cal OES
for eligibility
determination
- Draft and submit NOI
5/29: Notice of
Interest (NOIs) are
due to Cal OES via
the Engage Portal.

Once the NOI is
approved, the
subapplication is
available for
content /
development.
- Subapplicant should
identify potential
activities for NOI
development
- Project scoping call to
review potential
activities with Cal OES
for eligibility
determination
- Draft and submit NOI
Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
- Add project team
to the subapplication
(only Responsible
Representative can
do this)
- Gather materials
needed for
subapplication
development
including BCA data
- Attend webinars
- Participate in TA
calls
- Begin
subapplication
Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
- Continue
subapplication
- Attend webinars
and participate in TA
calls
- Mitigation projects
should pre-test the
BCA (determine costeffective)
- Review
subapplication
supporting materials
(templates: budget
narrative, BCA
narrative, Gantt
chart)
Ongoing technical
assistance,
webinars, and
subapplication
development
- Continue
subapplication
- Attend webinars
and participate in TA
calls
- QA/QC
subapplication and
materials (ensure
SOW, schedule, and
budget align and that
costs are calculated
for 2027/2028 award
- Ensure budget is
broken out into
reasonable line items
9/15:

Subapplications
are due to Cal OES
via the Engage
Portal
- Attend Cal OES
webinars and Office
Hours
- Finalize
subapplication and
attachments
- Responsible
Representative (RR)
submits
subapplication to Cal
OES in Engage portal
123
Tentative Summer Webinars (Subapplicants with Approved NOI) DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 5
124
DR-4856 Timeline
HMGP Overview / Eligibility
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
Next Steps
Q&A
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 6
125
Eligibility and Requirements Overview
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 7
Eligible:

Local governments, State agencies, cities,
counties, special districts, tribal
governments and private non-profits (PNPs)
Not Eligible:

Businesses, individuals
1 Eligible subapplicant
2 FEMA approved & locally adopted mitigation plan
3 No construction or groundbreaking before grant award
4 Approved Notice of Interest (NOI)
5 Scope of work with a clear level of protection increase 7 Cost-effectiveness / BCA
8 Non-Federal cost share (local match)
9 Period of Performance (POP) of 48 months
10 Not dependent on other projects or funding sources (standalone mitigation solution) 11 Must comply with 2 CRF 200 and Environmental & Historic Preservation 12 Reimbursement based grant with eligible grant management costs and pre-award costs 6 Mitigating natural hazards
126
Eligible HMGP Subapplication Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 8
Local Hazard Mitigation
Plans
• Activities include developing a new hazard mitigation plan or updating a current mitigation plan. Communities may participate in a single jurisdictional LHMP or participate in a multijurisdictional LHMP with multiple entities contributing to the same planning process and document. 36 months - period of performance.

Planning Related
Activities
• Activities include updating or enhancing sections of the current FEMA-approved mitigation plan (risk and vulnerability assessments), and integrating information from mitigation plans with other planning efforts (disaster recovery, comprehensive plans, long-term community planning initiatives). 36 months - period of performance.

Projects
(Shovel-Ready / Phased)
• Hazard mitigation projects that actively reduce the risk associated with natural hazards. Projects must be eligible, technically feasible, cost-effective, and environmental & historic preservation (EHP) compliant. Eligible project and hazard types are available outlined in the 2024 Hazard Mitigation Assistance Program and Policy Guide. No construction can begin before grant award. 48 months - period of performance.

Advance Assistance
(AA)
• Activities include the planning and technical studies needed for the development of future shovel ready mitigation projects and future completed HMA subapplications. Advance Assistance can be utilized when the preferred alternative is not known. The activities typically seen in AA include seismic assessments, H&H / modelling, alternative analysis, feasibility studies, 60% design, CEQA, EHP studies, BCA development, site selection, homeowner engagement, and a future project subapplication. 48 months - period of performance. NO CONSTRUCTION IN AA 127
Eligible HMGP Subapplication Types (con’t)
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 9
Building Codes and
Standards
• Activities include the implementation of codes, enhancements to existing adopted codes, development of professional workforce, evaluation of land use and zoning ordinances, and postdisaster code enforcement (track / enforcement of disaster damaged properties and technical assistance for disaster-damaged structures). 48 months - period of performance. 5% Initiative Activities
• Activities are defined as mitigation actions that meet all HMGP requirements but may be difficult to evaluate against traditional program cost-effectiveness criteria. Examples include early warning systems, public awareness and education for mitigation campaigns, and hazard identification or mapping. 48 months - period of performance. 128
Cost Effectiveness / Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA)
• Needed for all mitigation projects over $1 million (total project cost) • Project must achieve a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) ≥ 1.0 • Must use FEMA BCA Toolkit V.6.0
• All data inputs require credible documentation and justified via the required BCA methodology report
• These future costs or losses can include, but are not limited to:
• Direct damages (structure & contents damage, etc.)
• Loss of function / service
• Displacement costs
• Response / recovery costs
• Other activities (AA, 5%, codes, plans, planning related, EEWS) and projects under $1 million require a cost-effectiveness narrative (not a traditional BCA)
• Pre-calculated benefits also available for certain project types (projects only – hospital generator, acquisition, hurricane wind retrofits, elevations, mit recon, tornado safe rooms, and post-wildfire) DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 10
Benefits ÷ Costs ≥ 1.0
129
Environmental & Historic Preservation (EHP)
• Comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in advance of HMGP application and provide documentation with application, including any completed surveys in the project area (biological and archeological surveys)
• Frontload consultation with all relevant Federal, State and local agencies and provide communication within subapplication
• Provide visual supporting material (relevant maps, photos) of the project work areas, staging areas, and any areas that could be impacted by the project. On these visual materials identify critical habitat, locations of endangered species, historic landmarks and any other assets which may be impacted by the project.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 11
130
Procurement
Additional Procurement
Guidance
• Conflict of Interest:
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/fil
es/2020-
09/fema_using_contract_support_dev
elopment_hazard_mitigation_assistanc
e_grant_applications_07-16-15.pdf
• 2 CFR 200:
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part200/subpart-D/subject-groupECFR45ddd4419ad436d • PDAT:
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/fil
es/documents/fema_PDAT-fieldmanual_102021.pdf
• Contract Provisions:
https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/fil
es/documents/fema_contractprovisions-guide_6-14-2021.pdf DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 12
• All vendors involved in the subapplication development and scope implementation must be procured in line with 2 CFR 200 along with State and Local regulations. The most stringent applies. • In accordance with 2 CFR 200, vendors who assist with subapplication development will be ineligible to compete for subsequent procurements/contracts on the same subaward due to conflict of interest [i.e., future Phase I (design) and/or Phase II work (construction)].
131
Hazard Mitigation Planning Eligibility Factors
• Eligible subapplicants must have a FEMA approved and adopted local hazard mitigation plan (LHMP) or tribal hazard mitigation plan prior to the FEMA Notice of Grant Award. • Eligible subapplicants that do not meet the hazard mitigation planning requirement may have their county or an eligible private nonprofit apply on their behalf. • If a county or eligible private nonprofit applies on behalf of an eligible subapplicant, the county in which the work will be performed must meet the LHMP requirement.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 13
132
DR-4856 Timeline
HMGP Overview / Eligibility
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
Next Steps
Q&A
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 14
133
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
• Expedite rebuilding (streamline permitting and post-disaster code enforcement activities) • Innovative wildfire activities/projects • This includes grants for homeowners to retrofit their homes to be more fire resistant, AI-driven technology, and hazardous fuels reduction/defensible space. • Strengthen infrastructure to withstand wildfires, flooding, and other hazards and ensure essential services remain operational (water resource infrastructure, grid resilience, and storm-resistant infrastructure) • This includes stormwater capture, groundwater recharge, enhancing reservoir capacity to mitigate both drought and flood risks, accelerating undergrounding of power lines in wildfire-prone areas, and landslide barriers/erosion control measures to protect communities from post-wildfire conditions.
• Multi-Hazard mitigation initiatives that address interconnected hazard risks including wildfire, flooding, and drought (fire-flood prevention activities, expanding reclaimed water use for drought and wildfire mitigation).
• Integrated water resource management (groundwater recharge, stormwater diversion, and flood mitigation.
• Activities that foster a holistic approach to community resilience – partnering across Federal, State, tribal, local governments, non-profits, and the private sector.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 15
134
Local Hazard Mitigation Plans
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 16
• Hazard mitigation planning is the foundation for mitigation project development and future investments.
• Mitigation plans are strategic documents that guide communities to engage partners and identify actions to improve their overall resilience.
• Funds can be used for new plan or plan update.
• MJHMPs with at least 10 participants (Federal Share Cap $375K); • MJHMPs with five (5) to nine (9) participants (Federal Share Cap $300K); • MJHMPs with 2-4 participants (Federal Share Cap $250K); and • Single Jurisdiction plans (Federal Share Cap $165K).

Key Information
• Up to 7% of the total available
HMGP funds for California may
be used to fund the
development of hazard
mitigation plans, and hazard
mitigation plan updates.
• Cal OES recommends that
jurisdictions apply for a grant to
update their LHMP up to three
years before the expiration of
their current plan.
• Plans need to be updated every
five years to be compliant and
eligible for hazard mitigation
project funding (HMA projects).
135
Advance Assistance (AA)
• Seed funding to bridge the gap between hazard mitigation plans and project subapplications.
• Common deliverables for AA funding include technical studies, alternative analyses, selection of a preferred alternative, design, EHP, cost estimates, Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA), and development of a future project subapplication.
• No construction can occur in AA.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 17
Key Information
• Up to 25% of the total available
HMGP funds for California may
be used to develop and/or
design projects for HMGP or
other HMA programs.
136
Hazard Mitigation Projects
• Projects can be phased (Phase I is design / Phase II is construction) or shovel ready (construction only).
• Eligible project types must mitigate a natural hazard. • Information needed for project subapplications:
• Preferred alternative (detailed scope of work)
• Two alternatives (one can be no action)
• Technical feasibility and project effectiveness (conformance with established codes / engineering practices)
• Cost and cost narrative
• BCA / cost-effectiveness
• EHP (NEPA, NHPA, Engaged Species, EO11988, etc.)
• Schedule
• Maintenance letter
• Match commitment letter
• Considerations for easements and/or right of entries
• Homeowner participation if required
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 18
Eligible Project Types
• Wildfire mitigation (defensible
space, ignition-resistant
construction, fuels reduction,
post-wildfire flooding and erosion
control, and undergrounding)
• Mitigation reconstruction
• Structure elevation
• Stabilization
• Flood risk reduction
• Property acquisition / demo
• Tsunami vertical evacuation
refuge
• Safe rooms
• Retrofits (seismic, wind, wildfire,
snow, extreme temperature, and
air quality)
• Secondary power sources
• Aquifer recharge storage and
recovery
• Other solutions (natured based
solutions like wetland restoration)
Phased projects: if all sites are not known, 60% design has not occurred, easements and homeowner engagement has not
occurred, geotech work needs to be completed
137
Flood Mitigation Project Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 19
Flood Control/Drainage:

Vegetation Management for
Shoreline Management
Flood Control/Drainage:

Flood Protection Measures
Flood Control/Drainage:

Stormwater Management
Property Specific Flood
Mitigation
• Coastal, riverine, riparian
• Soil stabilization and
erosion control activities
• Wetland restoration
• Floodplain and stream
restoration
• Floodwalls
• Groins
• Seawalls
• Jetties
• Breakwaters
• Strengthen or harden
water systems that were
burned and caused
contamination
• Acquisition
• Mitigation reconstruction
• Floodproofing
• Dry and wet floodproofing
• Non-structural retrofitting
138
Wildfire / Post-Fire Mitigation Project Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 20
Wildfire Mitigation Infrastructure Retrofit Soil and Slope Stabilization Post Wildfire Flood Prevention • Defensible space
• Hazardous fuel reduction
• Removing
standing burned trees
• Ignitionresistant construction
• Strengthen or harden
water systems that
were burned and caused
contamination
• Reseeding Ground Cover
• Planting grass
• Mulching straw
• Erosion Control
• Installing debris traps
• Modifying or removing
culverts
• Adding
drainage dips/spillway
• Constructing straw, rock
or log dams to prevent
flooding
139
Seismic Mitigation Project Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 21
Non-structural of existing buildings and facilities
• Reinforce parapets and chimneys
• Secure cabinets and heavy furnishings
• Brace building utility equipment
Structural retrofitting of existing buildings
• Strengthen load paths
• Base isolation technique
• Mass reduction technique
• Fiber reinforced polymer
Infrastructure Retrofit
• Pipe upgrades
• Power facility hardening
• Bridge retrofits
140
Utility & Infrastructure Protection Project Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 22
Utility and Infrastructure protection covers a wide array of hazards (e.g. drought, flood, earthquake) and eligible
activities such as:
• Utility undergrounding (wildfire)
• Seismic retrofitting of infrastructure / pipelines (earthquake) • Infrastructure relocation (flood, seismic)
• Dam and reservoir retrofitting (flood or seismic)
• Creation of levees surrounding critical infrastructure • It was not possible to create a subapplication specific to each potential mitigation solution to address this need – this subapplication type acts as a catchall for many different types of projects
141
Drought Mitigation Project Types
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 23
• Aquifer Storage and Recharge Projects (ASR)
• Flood water diversion into above ground
reservoirs to supplement drought years
• Installation and construction of new production
wells
• Water treatment facilities and projects with water
treatment components
• Water infrastructure to increase the availability of
grey water to offset potable water uses
142
5% Initiative Activities
• Up to 5% of total HMGP funds may be used for activities that are difficult to evaluate against the traditional program’s cost effectiveness (and comply with all applicable HMGP eligibility criteria). • Early warning systems that alert people about natural hazards such as earthquakes, tornadoes, wildfires, tsunami, and flash floods;
• This includes advanced fire detection systems that expand AI driven fire prediction models and satellite monitoring • Education and outreach
• Mapping (including flood after fire);
• This includes AI-driven hazard mapping to guide regional resilience planning DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 24
143
Building Codes and Standards
• Up to 5% of total HMGP funds may be used for these activities. • The evaluation of the implementation of codes;
• Enhancements to existing adopted does;
• Development of professional workforce;
• Evaluation of land use and zoning ordinances;
• Post-disaster code enforcement (track / enforcement of disaster damaged properties and technical assistance for disaster-damaged structures).
• Use 5% codes and standards subapplication type in Engage.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 25
144
Planning-Related Activities
• Activities include updating or enhancing sections of the current FEMA-approved mitigation plan (risk / vulnerability assessments), strengthening the hazard mitigation strategy, and integrating information from mitigation plans with other planning efforts (disaster recovery, comprehensive plans, long-term community planning initiatives).
• Must result in a clearly defined product that informs the hazard mitigation plan.

DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 26
145
DR-4856 Timeline
HMGP Overview / Eligibility
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
Next Steps
Q&A
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 27
146
DR4856 NOFO| 28
147
Direct Link to NOFO:
https://www.caloes.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/HazardMitigation/Documents/DR-4856-HMGP-NOFO_ADA.pdf Grant Opportunities
DR4856 NOFO| 29
148
Notice of Interest (NOI)
DR4856 NOFO| 30
149
Engage Cal OES Portal
DR4856 NOFO| 31

1. Select the “Sign Up” link within the login box

2. Populate the sign-up form and select the
entity type

3. Once the entity type is selected, the system
will request the name or the type of entity
• County Name
• State Agency Name
• Non-Governmental Entity Type
• City Name
• Tribal Name
150
Notice of Interest (NOI)
DR4856 NOFO| 32
Click HMA
151
Notice of Interest (NOI): 3 Steps
DR4856 NOFO | 33
Submit NOI Upper Left Corner,
click submit NOI
Notice of Interest
1 2 3
152
Submitting the Notice of Interest Cal OES NOI Process
• Following submission of NOI, Cal
OES performs high-level eligibility
review
• Cal OES may request technical
assistance call to review the NOI
• Depending on the outcome of
the technical assistance, the
NOI will either be approved or
rejected
• If the NOI is approved, the
subapplicant can begin
completing the subapplication
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 34
Interested subapplicants must submit a Notice of Interest (NOI) via the Engage Cal OES Portal prior to submitting a subapplication.

Prior to submitting the NOI, subapplicants will need to be prepared to address the following questions:
• What is the natural hazard to be addressed?
• What is the problem caused by the natural hazard?
• What are the consequences if the project is not completed? • What are the existing conditions and the proposed level-of-protection increase?
NOI Contacts
Be sure to include at least two proper “Primary
Contacts” and two proper “Responsible
Representatives” on the NOI to ensure continuity and
seamless communication
153
Eligibility and Common Reasons for Follow-Up
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 35
• Does not mitigate a natural hazard
• Project is not compliant with code
• Project is in the SFHA
• The problem and mitigation solution are not
aligned
• The mitigation scope is vague or missing
• NOI contains ineligible HMA language or
ineligible activities
• Local match amount is incorrect or local
match source is not eligible
• LHMP is expired or near expiring
• Subapplication type is incorrect
• Project and hazard do not match
• Project title is ineligible
• POP is missing grant closeout
• There is a DOP
• Work has started
• SA is not responsible for O & M
• Not an independent mitigation solution
• Based on information in the NOI, the project
needs to be phased
• Lacks a level of protection increase
154
NOIs are Triaging Tools
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 36
Not meant to be full eligibility, feasibility, and
cost-effectiveness screening but meant to
help the subapplicant determine if the
project meets the minimum eligibility criteria
and raise potential issues EARLY in the
process (rather than after subapplication
development and subapplication
submission)
155
DR-4856 Next Steps
• Read the NOFO
• Confirm LHMP status via the Cal OES Hazard Mitigation Planning website • Be sure to sign-up for the listserv to receive Cal OES HMA notifications • Identify potential activities for NOI development
• Reach out to Cal OES for a project scoping call to review potential activities • Complete a NOI via the Engage Cal OES Portal (open now and closes on 5/29/2025 for DR-4856) • Attend additional Cal OES sponsored webinars
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 37
156
DR-4856 Timeline
HMGP Overview / Eligibility
DR-4856 Funding Priorities
Next Steps
Q&A
DR-4856 HMGP NOFO| 38
157
Q & A
Send all additional project
scoping, Technical Assistance,
and other questions to Cal OES
Hazard Mitigation Assistance at:
[email protected]
April 23, 2025 HMA Grant Opportunities | California
Governor's Office of Emergency Services
158
Agenda Item No.: 12.B
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 AMENDING CHAPTER

17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

On May 28, 2025, the City Council received a presentation from staff outlining the Planning Commission’s recommendations regarding height limits for single-family residences, stables, and barns (Attachment 03). Following the presentation, Ordinance No. 386 was introduced, proposing amendments to Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 and 17.16.080 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to formally establish these height limits.

The Ordinance was scheduled for second reading and adoption on the June 9, 2025, consent calendar. However, during that meeting, Mayor Pieper requested that the item be pulled for further discussion. The Mayor expressed concerns about the proposed height limit and recommended increasing the maximum height from 18 feet to 21 feet, measured from the finished floor to the peak of the structure, for homes, barns, and stables.

Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer also requested revisions to clarify the ordinance language, specifically, to ensure that attic or storage space within a structure does not count toward the 21-foot height limit. She further asked that staff clearly identify acceptable architectural styles or design features consistent with City expectations.

As a result of these proposed substantive changes, the ordinance must return for further review and reintroduction. Staff and the City Attorney have since met to revise the language in response to the Council’s direction. A redline version of requested changes is provided (Attachment 02).

This evening, staff is presenting the updated ordinance language for City Council’s 159
consideration. If the revisions are acceptable, staff will bring the ordinance back for a second reading and adoption at the July 7, 2025, City Council meeting.

DISCUSSION:

Staff, in coordination with the City Attorney, revised the ordinance language in response to Mayor Pieper’s request to increase the allowable height for homes, barns, and stables, as well as Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer’s request for clarification. Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment 1) proposes amendments to Chapter 17.16, specifically Sections 17.16.060 and 17.16.080 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, to establish updated height limits for single-family residences, stables, and barns.

Ordinance Text as Presented on June 9
The revised language is reflected in the proposed amendment to Section 17.16.060 (Lot Area and Dimensions), with additions shown in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns which shall be no greater than 20’
Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.
160
Updated Ordinance Text for Consideration
A clean version of the updated ordinance text is provided below. Attachment 2 includes the proposed changes, with additions shown in blue text and deletions indicated by red strikethrough. It is important to note that any underlined text is considered new language.

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 21’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns); see Section 17.16.080

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of any building or structure shall be no greater than twenty-one (21) feet; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns (inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of projecting architectural features as defined in Section 17.12.160.

2. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A.pdf
161
Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A_Change-ProRedline.pdf Attachment 03 - CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item11A.pdf
162
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly singlestory California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 163
2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact.

Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 21’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns); see
Section 17.16.080

Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
164
3 1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of any building or structure shall be no greater than twenty-one (21) feet; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns (inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of projecting architectural features as defined in Section 17.12.160.
2, The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025. 165
4 JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 166
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single-story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
167
2 RA-S-1
Development Standard
RA-S-2
Zone District

4. Height Limitation
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact.

Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

One story, no greater than 1821’ (mezzanines and lofts
are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’); see Section 17.16.080
Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
168

1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of theany building or structure shall be no greater than eighteentwenty-one (1821) feet except that; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20)(inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure,. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of accessoryprojecting architectural features as determined by the City. defined in Section 17.12.160.
2, The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter

17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance..

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings.
3 169
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 4 170
0 Table Insert
Changes:
0 Table Delete 0
Add
Intelligent Table Comparison: Active
Table moves to
14 0
Summary report:

Litera Compare for Word 11.10.1.2 Document comparison done on 6/19/2025 1:50:20 PM
Table moves from 0
Delete
Embedded Graphics (Visio, ChemDraw, Images etc.)
10 0
Original DMS: iw://bbklaw-mobility.imanage.work/IMANAGE/43895839/1 Embedded Excel 0
Move From
Format changes
0 0
Total Changes:

Modified DMS: iw://bbklaw-mobility.imanage.work/IMANAGE/43895839/2 24 Move To
Style name: Default Style
171
Agenda Item No.: 11.A
Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16

OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: May 28, 2025
BACKGROUND:

Over the past several months, the Planning Commission has been reviewing the City’s regulations related to building height limitations for residential structures, barns, and stables.

The intent of this review was to clarify standards and ensure consistency with the City’s rural character and development goals.

On October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a report on the City's regulations related to building height limitations. At that time, the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) did not specify numeric height limits for these structures. However, the RHMC did state that “a building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another” (Attachment 3). The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 9.

At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed staff’s report on existing development patterns and relevant RHMC provisions. Following discussion, the Commission directed staff to prepare a code amendment establishing maximum ridge heights of 18 feet for single-family residences and 20 feet for barns and stables. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 10.

On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the draft ordinance (Attachment 1) and voted 4-0 (with Commissioner Kirkpatrick absent) to adopt Resolution No. 2025-04 (Attachment 2), recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 17.16 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to codify these height limits. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 11. 17226
This evening, staff is requesting City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment 1), which proposes clear regulations regarding maximum allowable structure heights. This ordinance is intended to preserve the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character of the community. As the City continues to grow, the proposed height limits would help ensure that new development remains consistent with the community’s established aesthetic values and overall harmony.

DISCUSSION:

In recent years, there has been a trend toward increased structure heights and overall massing. At both the October 15, 2024 and March 18, 2025 Planning Commission meetings, staff presented relevant sections of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) addressing height regulations. This allowed the Commissioners to consider these provisions and develop a recommendation for City Council review. To further support the Commission’s efforts, staff conducted research on building heights within the City. The data, compiled from approved plans between 2017 and 2024, includes both residences and stables. Heights ranged from 11 to 25 feet, with some newer structures exceeding 25 feet (Attachment 4). Notably, in 2023 and 2024, there has been a trend toward taller stables, many of which fall within the 20 to 25-foot range.

The following sections from the RHMC were reviewed and considered as part of this effort:

Basements - RHMC Chapter 17.12 – Definitions
Basements are located below ground and are often not visible. Homes may include multiple basement levels. Basement walls—except those within light wells—may not exceed 5 feet in height and must maintain an average height of no more than 2.5 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the exterior of the basement (Attachment 5).

Stables & Lofts
Stables are considered a valuable asset to each property and contribute significantly to the City’s rural, equestrian character. Based on staff research, the RHMC does not establish a specific height limit for stables. Over the past five years, stables have been trending taller.

While the average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is approximately 17 feet, the tallest stable recorded was 25 feet. Many stables also include lofts, as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060.

These lofts, which may resemble second stories, must have a plate height that does not exceed 7 feet. They are intended for hay and equipment storage or use as a tack room and may not contain sleeping quarters (Attachment 6).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries larger than 200 square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 7).

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." Storage areas may be located above or below a story but are not intended to be livable spaces. As such, they cannot include exterior doors, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. The height of a storage area may not exceed 6 feet at any point. Attics may have ceilings that follow the angle of the roofline, which can exceed 6 feet at the peak; however, staff reviews plans to ensure that staircases are not shown leading 17327
to attic storage areas (Attachment 5).

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) – RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 For detached ADUs on lots with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling, the maximum height is limited to 16 feet. This height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor—whichever is lower—to the structure’s peak. If the ADU is attached to the primary dwelling, it may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone, whichever is lower (Attachment 8).

Based on the information presented, the Planning Commission discussed building heights for residential structures, barns, and stables. At the conclusion of these discussions, the Commissioners agreed that a maximum residential building height of 18 feet was reasonable.

For barns and stables, the Commissioners shared the heights of stables on their own properties and used a practical approach to estimate the necessary height to accommodate stall areas and tack room or loft space. This resulted in a consensus that a 20-foot height was appropriate for barns and stables.

Below is language that the City Council is considering this evening:

Municipal Ordinance No. 386
The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows:

Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns which shall be no greater than 20’
Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by 17428
a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Notice of Public Hearing
This item was publicly noticed in the Daily Breeze on May 1, 2025 (Attachment 11).

Public Comment
As of the date of this report, no public comments have been received.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion:

Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17; and introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 386 regarding the height limits of single-family residential homes, stables and barns.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf
Attachment 02 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit_F_E.pdf Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_STAFF REPORT OF HEIGHTS.pdf
Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions_Basements.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 07 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 08 -
PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 09 - CL_AGN_241015_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf
Attachment 10 - CL_AGN_250318_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf
Attachment 11 - CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10C_SR.pdf
Attachment 12 - CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance_Affidavit.pdf 17529
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly singlestory California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 17630
2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact.

Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’

Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
17731
3 The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance..

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
17832
4 ATTEST:
____________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 17933
18034
18135
18236
18337
18438
18539
Building Heights Report

RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE
2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable
2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable
2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home
2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home
2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable
2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home
2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable
2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home
2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home
2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home
2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home
2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home
2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home
2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home
2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home
2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home
Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home
2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House
2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage
2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable
2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU
2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House
2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House
2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable
2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable
Average 17
High 25
Low 11
18640
Building Heights Report

RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE
2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable
2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable
2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home
2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home
2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable
2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home
2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable
2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home
2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home
2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home
2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home
2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home
2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home
2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home
2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home
2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home
Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home
2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House
2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage
2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable
2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU
2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House
2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House
2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable
2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable
Average 17
High 25
Low 11
City of Rolling Hills
Building Heights Report
18741
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

Barn. See "stable."
"Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells, basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story. "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or materials of any kind or nature.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.
"Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles, other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses, but excludes sleeping quarters.

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.
"Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain, equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human sleeping or commercial purposes.
18842
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

"Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.
"Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 18943
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit.

All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

A. General requirements and uses:

1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only.

2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line.

3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5).

4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure.

5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter.

6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls.

7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable.

9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto:

1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable.

2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 19044
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

C. Tack Room Space.

1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter.

2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds.

5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling.

6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings.

7. Tack room may have standard size doors.

8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets.

9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet.

10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications.

11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals.

12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section.

D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable.

1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance.

2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high.

3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door.

4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited.

5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements.

6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 19145
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses.

E. Loft Space within a Stable.

1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure.

2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)).

3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property.

4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed.

5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet.

6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface.

7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013)
19246
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit.

All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements.

2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet.

3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1.

4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line.

5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots.

6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16.

8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 19347
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements.

B. Height.

1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height.

2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.

3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height.

4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories.

5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 19448
Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 10/15/2024
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: JOHN F. SIGNO, AICP,
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ON BUILDING HEIGHT
DATE: October 15, 2024
BACKGROUND:

Recently, there has been discussion about the City's height limitation allowed. Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachments 1 and 2).

DISCUSSION:

Basements
Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are allowed to have multiple basement levels. A portion of the basement may daylight provided it does not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior.

Lofts
Many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.12.120 (Attachment 2).

These lofts often appear to be second stories and can reach a height of 25 feet (Attachment 3). Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room provided there are no sleeping quarters.

Lofts may also be found in some residences and may be legal if they were built prior to the City's incorporation in 1957. Additionally, residences in the Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) have steeper pitched roofs to meet architectural standards for a colonial building, which is a standard imposed by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Lofts are not allowed in the OZD-1 district, but many have attic spaces converted to a loft or second story because of the high ceiling heights.

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as a "space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or 1 19549
below a story, but is not meant to be livable and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff reviews plans to make sure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic.

Conclusion
The Planning Commission should discuss if the height requirement in the Code is adequate. If not, the Commission can make recommendations to improve or amend the height requirement to be considered at a later date.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation..pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_STA_Stable_Comparison.pdf
2 19650
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:26 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

17.16.080 Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one‐half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one‐story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993). (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7‐15‐2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6‐11‐2012) 19751
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

Barn. See "stable."
"Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells, basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story. "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or materials of any kind or nature.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.
"Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles, other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses, but excludes sleeping quarters.

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.
"Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain, equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human sleeping or commercial purposes.
19852
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

"Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.
"Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 19953

STABLE COMPARISON
Address Size (SF) Height
(Ft.)
Yr.

Approved
Notes
9 PBR 1,334 21.4 2023
74 PBR 960 11 2023
8 Middleridge Ln S 750 13 2022
29 Crest Rd W 900 13.5 2022 Originally approved for 934 SF 8 Quail Ridge Rd N 2,780 25 2021 Plus 7' cupola = 32'
8 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd 1,875 12 2021 Approx. height
15 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 935 20.8 2021
13 PBR 3,360 24 2019
1 Poppy Trail 452 12.25 2019
20 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 3,575 20 2018
11 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 744 20 2017
7 Middleridge Lane S. 1,361 18.4 2017
6 Meadowlark Ln. 779 20 2017
11 Saddleback 2,340 19.5 2017 To top of cupola
5 Pine Tree Ln. 1,200 14 2017 Plus cupola = ~19'
10 Crest Rd. W 1,188 19.3 2016
77 Crest Rd. E 3,691 18.4 2016
9 Chuckwagon Rd. 2,088 21 2014
3 Meadowlark Ln. 840 19.6 2013
29 Middleridge Ln. S 2,960 23.4 2011
14 Portuguese Bend Rd. 918 18.5 2005 1st floor only
6 Possum Ridge Rd. 1,680 21.5 2003 1st floor only
23 Crest Rd. E 1,225 18.75 Proposed; not built
6 Saddleback Rd. 650 17
2 Meadowlark Ln. 239 18 1st floor only
11 Saddleback Road 2,414 16 2018
2 Possum Ridge   1,890 1994
29 Middleridge Ln. S 3,200 23.6 1996
4 Stormhill Lane 2,064 12.5
1 Pine Tree Lane 2,976 14.5 2015
1 Morgan Lane 4,038 24.9 1st Flr. 2,377 SF; 2nd Flr. 1,721 SF 20054
Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 03/18/2025
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL DISCUSSION

REGARDING BUILDING HEIGHTS
DATE: March 18, 2025
BACKGROUND:

On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s building height limitations. During the meeting, the Commission directed Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. The Commission subsequently recommended moving forward with the issue and scheduling it for further consideration.

This evening, Staff is seeking recommendations from the Planning Commission regarding height limits for structures, which will be presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff will need to provide public notice in advance of the Council’s review, which will require both a first and second hearing before any changes can be enacted.

DISCUSSION:

Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachment 1).

This evening, staff will provide an overview of existing height regulations for various structures, including single-story limits and exceptions for basements, stables, storage areas, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and aviaries. Additionally, the report highlights regulations the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) set, which further restrict plate heights and roof pitches through architectural review and deed restrictions.

The Planning Commission is being asked to review these existing regulations and provide 1 20155
direction on potential modifications to height limits for structures within the City. Any recommended changes will require public notice and City Council approval through a twohearing process before they can be enacted.

Basements
Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are permitted to have multiple basement levels. Basement walls, except for walls within light wells, may not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior (Attachment 2).

Stables & Lofts
Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola). (Attachment 3)
However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5).

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or below a story but is not meant to be a livable space and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed 6 feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than 6 feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff review plans to ensure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic (Attachment 2).

ADU
Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure.

An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 6).

The Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has building regulations that have 2 20256
restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches. The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by-case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7).

RHCA- Plate Height
The standard plate height for structures in the RHCA Building Regulations is 8’6”, measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam at the porch. Residences may have taller plate heights, but the heights must meet the following restrictions: a minimum of 50% of the residence must have a plate height of 8’6” or lower, up to 30% of the residence may have a 9’6” plate height and up to 20% of the residence may have a maximum of 10’6” plate height.

The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012.

RHCA- Roof Pitches
The standard roof pitch for all structures in 4:12. The Building Regulations allow a minimum pitch of 3:12 for contemporary designs with hip roofs and a maximum 4½:12 pitch traditional designs. The roof pitch is also considered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSION:

Staff is seeking the Planning Commission’s recommendations on whether the current height limitations in the RHMC effectively preserve the City’s rural, equestrian character while allowing for reasonable development. The discussion should evaluate whether these regulations strike the right balance between community aesthetics and the functional needs of structures such as stables, storage areas, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

Additionally, the Commission may wish to address the increasing size of stables, the limitations on lofts and storage areas, and the prescribed height allowances for basements and ADUs that align with the City's long-term vision.

If the Commission finds that the current height regulations are insufficient, it may provide direction on potential amendments or improvements. This could include adjusting height limits for specific structures, refining definitions to prevent unintended interpretations, or establishing clearer guidelines for review and enforcement. Any recommended changes will require further public input and City Council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction staff to make height limit.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation.pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 4: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf 3 20357
Attachment 5: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 6:

PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 7: PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC&Rs_Building.Heights.pdf 4 20458
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.16.080 Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993). (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6-11-2012) 20559
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

Barn. See "stable."
"Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells, basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story. "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or materials of any kind or nature.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.
"Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles, other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses, but excludes sleeping quarters.

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.
"Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain, equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human sleeping or commercial purposes.
20660
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

"Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.
"Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 20761
Building Heights Report

RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE
2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable
2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable
2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home
2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home
2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable
2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home
2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable
2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home
2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home
2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home
2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home
2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home
2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home
2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home
2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home
2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home
Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home
2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House
2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage
2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable
2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU
2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House
2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House
2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable
2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable
Average 17
High 25
Low 11
20862
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit.

All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

A. General requirements and uses:

1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only.

2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line.

3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5).

4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure.

5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter.

6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls.

7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable.

9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto:

1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable.

2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 20963
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

C. Tack Room Space.

1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter.

2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds.

5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling.

6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings.

7. Tack room may have standard size doors.

8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets.

9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet.

10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications.

11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals.

12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section.

D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable.

1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance.

2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high.

3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door.

4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited.

5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements.

6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 21064
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses.

E. Loft Space within a Stable.

1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure.

2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)).

3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property.

4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed.

5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet.

6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface.

7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013)
21165
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit.

All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements.

2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet.

3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1.

4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line.

5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots.

6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16.

8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 21266
Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements.

B. Height.

1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height.

2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.

3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height.

4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories.

5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 21367

PLATE HEIGHTS

DISCUSSION
Current Regulations:

To help maintain the low rambling nature of ranch architecture, plate heights are limited and strictly enforced. While the recommended plate height for a residence is 8’6”, taller plates are allowed on a case-by-case basis if harmonious with the design and massing of the overall residence.
i. Plate heights are measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam. (See Appendix L “Illustrations of Plate Height”)
ii. The following percentages are the allowable limits for plate heights above 8’6”:
(Percentages of plate height are calculated by the linear footage of the perimeter.) 1) Minimum of 50% of the residence must have plate heights of 8’6” or lower, 2) Up to 30% of the residence may have a plate height up to 9’6, ** 3) Only 20% of the residence may have a plate height up to 10’6. ** ** Maximum plate heights may be limited and are considered on a case-by-case basis to assure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind.

Attached is the current Appendix for plate heights as well additional examples for discussion. 21468

APPENDIX L

ILLUSTRATIONS OF PLATE HEIGHT
21569

PLATE HEIGHT AT PORCH
If a porch is present, the plate height is
measured from the finish floor of the
residence to the top of the beam of the porch
21670
PLATE HEIGHT @ STANDARD EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish
floor of the residence to the top plate, where the
eave rafter meets the top of the wall.
21771
PLATE HEIGHT @ SOFFITED EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish floor
of the residence to where the soffited eave meets
the exterior wall.
21872
Agenda Item No.: 10.C
Mtg. Date: 04/15/2025
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: LISA EDWARDS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING

THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER
SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: April 15, 2025
BACKGROUND:

On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s regulations pertaining to building height limitations within the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code. The Commission tasked Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed Staff’s report and made a motion to direct Staff to draft a proposed municipal code ordinance amendment that includes a maximum ridge height for homes to 18 feet and a maximum ridge height for barns and stables, not including the cupola or other accessories, to 20 feet (5 -0 vote). At this time, Staff is requesting a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council regarding proposed height limits for structures that are incorporated in the draft resolution and ordinance attached hereto. Once the Commission provides its recommendation, the City Council will conduct a first and second reading of the proposal.

DISCUSSION:

The City is considering the introduction of a new ordinance (Ordinance No. 386) aimed at addressing building heights within the community (Attachment 1). This proposed ordinance seeks to establish clear regulations regarding the maximum allowable height for structures, with the goal of preserving the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character. As the City experiences growth and development, this measure would help ensure that new constructions align with the community’s aesthetic values while maintaining harmony with its surroundings. Public feedback and further discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the final version of this ordinance.
1 21973
Commissioner Discussion
During the last Planning Commission meeting, a discussion addressing the heights of residences and stables were both analyzed in order to establish maximum heights in the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). Historically, the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) had been the authority on structural heights for main homes, stables, and barns.

Although the Code mentions that the maximum height for any residence is one -story, it does not specify an exact height dimension. Similarly, the allowance of a loft within a barn (maximum 7-foot plate height for wall of loft) is mentioned, but no overall height is specified.

Although the Commission unanimously agreed that the residential height of 18 feet was reasonable, the focus of the discussion was primarily with regard to heights of barns and stables. Commissioners then shared stable heights on their own properties and used a logical calculation that would accommodate the stall areas, tack room/loft area, which landed at a 20- foot height.

Municipal Ordinance No. 386
The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows:

Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns which shall be no greater than 20’
Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this 2 22074
section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

The following is a review of the Code Sections that address height:

Basements
Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are permitted to have multiple basement levels. Basement walls, except for walls within light wells, may not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior (Attachment 3).

Stables & Lofts
Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola) However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5).

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or below a story but is not meant to be a livable space and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed 6 feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than 6 feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff review plans to ensure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic (Attachment 6).

ADU
RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 7).

Building Heights Report
This report was compiled using building heights approved between 2017 and 2024 (see Attachment 8). The data was analyzed to assess the range of heights for both residences and stables, which varied from 11 to 25 feet. Notably, there has been a recent trend (2023–2024) 3 22175
of increasing stable heights, with many falling within the 20 to 25-foot range.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
RHCA – ADU
The RHCA has building regulations that have restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches.

The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by- case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7).

RHCA- Plate Height
The standard plate height for structures in the RHCA Building Regulations is 8’6”, measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam at the porch. Residences may have taller plate heights, but the heights must meet the following restrictions: a minimum of 50% of the residence must have a plate height of 8’6” or lower, up to 30% of the residence may have a 9’6” plate height and up to 20% of the residence may have a maximum of 10’6” plate height.

The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012 (Attachment 9).

RHCA- Roof Pitches
The standard roof pitch for all structures in 4:12. The Building Regulations allow a minimum pitch of 3:12 for contemporary designs with hip roofs and a maximum 4½:12 pitch traditional designs. The roof pitch is also considered on a case-by-case basis.

Public Comment
No public responses have been received as of the date of this report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion:

Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance that is attached thereto as Exhibit “A.” ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit.pdf Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf
Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.12.190_Storage.pdf Attachment 07 -
4 22276
PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 08 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 09 - PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC_Rs_Building.Heights.pdf CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_Affidavit.pdf
5 22377
65277.00001\43665712.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE

CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17

OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND

THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM
CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single-story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are limited to one story in height, with few exceptions; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission requested a report on the City’s residential building height regulations to facilitate discussion on the matter; and WHEREAS, at the March 18, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, City staff presented their report for discussion, whereby the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section

17.50.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (“RHMC”), directed City staff to draft an ordinance updating the RHMC to impose a height limit on residential buildings; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2025, the City gave public notice of the public hearing for Ordinance No. 386 by publishing the required notice in a newspaper of general circulation and posting the notice at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning Ordinance No. 386.
22478
65277.00001\43665712.1

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. CEQA. The Planning Commission finds that the Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because it involves imposing a maximum building height on residential development and does not propose nor authorize any action that would have the potential to cause a physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 3. General Plan. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

SECTION 4. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing recitals and findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed Ordinance, attached as Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 5. Certification. The Planning Commission Chair shall sign and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution. 22579
65277.00001\43665712.1

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2025. __________________________

BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
_________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
22680
65277.00001\43665712.1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-04 entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE CITY

COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 17.16 AND 17.17 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING

HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL

HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 15, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

And in compliance with the law of California was posted at the following:

Administrative Offices.
_______________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
22781
ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly singlestory California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on _____, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 22882
2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact.

Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’

Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
22983
3 The maximum height permitted from floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance..

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
23084
4 ATTEST:
____________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 23185
Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)