Agenda packet — Rolling Hills City Council, July 28, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

1 City Council
Monday, July 28, 2025, 7:00 PM
Regular Meeting
City of Rolling Hills
The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The City Council meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. View both the agenda and the live-streamed video.

Members of the public may submit written comments by emailing the City Clerk’s office at [email protected]. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record if received before 3pm on the meeting day. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.

View recordings to City Council meetings online.

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Presentations/Proclamations/Announcements

5. Approve Order of the Agenda
This is the appropriate time for the Mayor or Councilmembers to approve the agenda as is or reorder.

6. Blue Folder Items (Supplemental)
Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

7. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will take place on any items not on the agenda.

8. Consent Calendar
Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any Councilmember may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Councilmembers for discussion.

Page 1 of 297 ends

2 8.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2025

8.B. Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda

8.C. Approve the following Minutes of June 23, 2025: City Council Regular Meeting

8.D. Payment of Bills

8.E. Republic Services Recycling Tonnage And Complaint Reports For May and June 2025

8.F. For Second Reading and Adoption: Adopt by Title Only Ordinance No. 386 amending Chapter 17.16 of the Municipal Code regarding the height limits of singlefamily residential homes, stables and barns; and finding the action to be statutorily exempt from CEQA under section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code

8.G. Designate voting delegate and alternate voting delegate to the League Of California Cities Annual Conference from October 8-10 to be held in Long Beach, CA

9. Excluded Consent Calendar Items

10. Commission Items

11. Public Hearings

11.A. A Public Hearing to Consider and Adopt Resolution No. 1395 Authorizing Placement of Solid Waste Service Charges Owed to Republic Services Pursuant to its Solid Waste Franchise with the City of Rolling Hills on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller's Office Annual Tax Roll

12. Discussion Items

12.A. Consider and approve Republic Services field operation expansion of Mother Truck staging site locations

12.B. Consideration of awarding a construction contract to Fidelity Builders, Inc. for providing construction services on the Tennis Court ADA Improvement Project in an amount not-to-exceed $783,506.25, Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act

12.C. Authorize the City Manager to Sign a Letter of Support for the Palos Verdes Peninsula Mass Care and Evacuation Plan Grant Application

13. Matters From the City Council

14. Matters From Staff

14.A. Receive and File a Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Update

14.B. Receive and file a Verbal Update on the status of the Traffic Commission Vacancy and Appointment

Page 2 of 297 ends

3 15. Recess to Closed Session

15.A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) the City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the city in the litigation. (3 cases) a.

Name of case: Connie Andersen, et al. V. California Water Company, et al. (Seaview case) Case No.: 24STCV20953 b. Name of case: City of Rolling Hills v. SCE CPUC docket no. C.24-10-008 c. Name of case: City of Rolling Hills v. SoCalGas CPUC docket no. C.24-10-009

15.B. Conference with legal counsel - initiation of litigation a closed session will be held, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) and (d)(4) regarding the decision of whether to initiate litigation (1 case)

16. Reconvene to Open Session

17. Adjournment
Next regular meeting: Monday, August 11, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274.

Notice:

Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.

Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting.

Page 3 of 297 ends

Item: 8.A.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of July 28, 2025 Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. CL_AGN_250728_CC_AffidavitofPosting

Page 4 of 297 ends

Administrative Report

8.A., File # 2025-21 Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
From: Christian Horvath, City Clerk
TITLE
APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 28, 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below.

Legislative Body City Council
Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda
Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window
City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agendas_meetings.php https://rollinghillsca.portal.civicclerk.com/
Meeting Date & Time JULY 28, 2025 7:00pm Open Session
As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below.

Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Date: July 25, 2025

Page 5 of 297 ends

Item: 8.B.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda
Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve.

Attachments:

None

Page 6 of 297 ends

Item: 8.C.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve the following Minutes of June 23, 2025: City Council Regular Meeting Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. CL_MIN_250623_CC_F

Page 7 of 297 ends

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 23, 2025

Page 1 ends

Minutes
Rolling Hills City Council
Monday, June 23, 2025
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m.

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Pieper presiding.

2. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper Councilmembers Absent: None
Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Samantha Crew, Management Analyst
Stephanie Grant, Assistant Planner
Norma Tabares, Assistant City Attorney

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Black

4. PRESENTATIONS / PROCLAMATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Pieper announced that the City Council would be adjourning the meeting in memory of former Mayor and Councilmember Gordana Swanson and read a brief bio.

5. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

6. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) – NONE

7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
Public Comment: Robert Tun

8. CONSENT CALENDAR

8.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025

8.B. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL

ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA

8.C. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 2025: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

Page 8 of 297 ends

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 23, 2025

Page 2 ends

8.D. PAYMENT OF BILLS

8.E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1392 APPROVING THE UPDATED FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PAY

SCHEDULE TO COMPLY WITH CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM (CALPERS) STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPENSATION

EARNABLE AND PUBLICLY AVAILABLE PAY SCHEDULES
Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve the Consent Calendar.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

9. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS – NONE

10. COMMISSION ITEMS – NONE

10.A. ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY

STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, FOR THE LOCATION AT 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (YOU & WANG) (LOT 6-SK)
Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant
Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

11. PUBLIC HEARINGS – NONE

12. OLD BUSINESS

12.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A PRESENTATION REGARDING CALOES/FEMA BUYOUT PROGRAM Presentation by Management Analyst Crew
Robyn Fennig, California Office of Emergency Services
Public Comment: Maureen Hill, Matthew Fournier, Alison Smart Mayor Pieper directed staff to work with interested residents, keep things narrow, get the list of criteria needed from Cal OES, perform a basic benefit cost analysis and return to a subsequent City Council meeting with the findings.

Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper

Page 9 of 297 ends

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 23, 2025

Page 3 ends

NOES: None
ABSENT: None

12.B. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL

CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE Presentation by City Manager Bañales
Motion by Councilmember Black seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to separate the house height from the barn/stable height, return at a later time to address barn/stable height, modify language to clarify exceptions to one story general limitations and re-introduce for first reading with proposed changes.

After further discussion, the motion was withdrawn.

Motion by Mayor Pieper seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to maintain the proposed ordinance’s home height at 21 feet, raise the barns/stable height to 23 feet, modify language to clarify exceptions to one story general limitations and re-introduce for first reading with proposed changes. Motion carried with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Pieper
NOES: Dieringer
ABSENT: None

13. NEW BUSINESS

13.A. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO FIDELITY BUILDERS, INC. FOR PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ON THE TENNIS COURT ADA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $783,506.25, AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT, AND FINDING THE PROJECT

CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath After discussion, Mayor Pieper tabled the item to the next meeting. Without objection so ordered.

14. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL – NONE

15. MATTERS FROM STAFF

15.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS UPDATE Presentation by Management Analyst Crew
Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

16. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION – 10:06 P.M.

Page 10 of 297 ends

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, June 23, 2025

Page 4 ends

16.A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL,

THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES)
A. NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953
B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10- 009

16.B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE

16.C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (D)(2) AND (E)(3)

BASED ON EXISTING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY (1 CASE)

17. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – 11:08 P.M.

18. ADJOURNMENT: 11:08 P.M.

The meeting was adjourned at 11:08 p.m. on June 23, 2025 in memory of former Rolling Hills Mayor and Councilmember Gordana Swanson. The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held on Monday, July 14, 2025 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via City’s website link at: https://www.rollinghills.org/government/agenda/index.php All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Jeff Pieper, Mayor

Page 11 of 297 ends

Item: 8.D.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Payment of Bills
Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. CL_AGN_250714_CC_PaymentOfBills

2. CL_AGN_250728_CC_PaymentOfBills

Page 12 of 297 ends

Page 13 of 297 ends

Page 14 of 297 ends

Page 15 of 297 ends

Page 16 of 297 ends

Item: 8.E.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Republic Services Recycling Tonnage And Complaint Reports For May and June 2025
Background:

On July 1, 2020, the City entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement with Republic Services for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste, including recyclables, green waste, bulky items, and brush. The Agreement is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2029.

As part of this partnership, the city regularly receives and reviews Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports from Republic Services. These reports serve several important municipal, regulatory, and community functions.

Discussion:

The primary purpose of the Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports is to provide the City with oversight and transparency regarding its waste management and recycling services. These reports enable the City to monitor the volume of waste and recyclable materials collected and processed, as well as identify any recurring service issues or resident complaints. By regularly reviewing these reports, the City can ensure that Republic Services is fulfilling its contractual obligations, promptly addressing service deficiencies, and making informed decisions related to public education and operational improvements. Additionally, the reports support compliance with state and county mandates for recycling and waste diversion, while supplying essential data for planning and reporting to regulatory agencies.

Below are highlights of the types of reports and notes included:

Recycling Tonnage Report: Documents the total weight of recyclable materials collected, helping the City measure progress toward recycling and waste diversion goals and comply with mandated requirements.

Complaint Report: Logs resident complaints related to waste and recycling services—such as missed pickups or other service issues, to enable tracking of service quality and resolution of recurring

Page 17 of 297 ends

concerns.

Red Tags Report: Records instances where a "red tag" is issued at an address, indicating a violation or another issue with waste practices.

Missed Pick-Up Report: Details incidents where scheduled waste pickups were missed, including the address, date, and resolution status.

Commercial Recycling: Commercial recycling materials are hauled to various transfer facilities, with a portion separated and recovered. Recovery rates from these facilities are reported monthly and applied to servicing areas.

Greenwaste Reporting: Greenwaste data in the Non-Franchise report may fluctuate monthly due to factors like changes in customer service types, load contamination, or data entry errors.

Resident Services: Residents may request one free roll-off container for green waste disposal once a year. Monthly Residential Franchise Reports highlight usage of these bins.

Diversion Requirements: Under the current Agreement between the City and Republic Services, Republic Services is required to achieve a minimum annual Diversion Rate of 30% for Residential Solid Waste Collection Services. This Diversion Rate is calculated by dividing the tons of materials recycled and shipped (net of residue) by the total tons of waste collected annually. However, the City itself must comply with CalRecycle’s mandate that requires a statewide recycling rate of at least 50%.

This means the City must work with Republic Services to meet or exceed the 50% recycling goal, even though Republic Services’ contractual minimum is 30%.

At the May 28 City Council meeting, Councilmember Mirsch requested clarification regarding the reported figure of 16.7 pounds of trash per person per year, noting that this number seemed surprisingly low. The Councilmember sought to verify the accuracy of this figure and whether it specifically referred to landfill trash rather than total waste.

Staff worked with Republic Services and determined that the figure of 16.7 pounds does not represent the amount of trash generated per person per year. Rather, it is the maximum allowable landfill trash per person per day established by CalRecycle for the City of Rolling Hills to comply with the State’s 50% recycling mandate. It is important to note that the City achieves compliance with California’s recycling and waste diversion requirements by diverting green waste (such as yard trimmings and plant matter) from landfills and incorporating it into its overall waste management program.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Free Residential Roll-Off Bin
As mentioned, the City offers residents the opportunity to request one free roll-off container annually for green waste disposal. According to the current Residential Franchise Reports for January (labeled 1), February (labeled 2), and April (labeled 4), the reports highlight entries labeled “Greenwaste – Free Residential Roll-Off Bin” and “Trash-Free Residential Roll-Off Bin.” Although the City does not provide free roll-off bins for regular trash collection, the presence of “Trash-Free Residential Roll-Off Bin” in the report may indicate one of two possibilities:
• When Republic Services retrieves the bin and returns it to their facility, they may have identified contamination in the green waste bin, such as non-green waste disposed of improperly.

Page 18 of 297 ends

• Alternatively, this may be due to data entry or keying errors that require correction.

City staff has requested that the Reporting and Operations teams investigate these occurrences to determine the exact cause of this discrepancy and make any necessary corrections.

Red Tag Report Abbreviations
COMM: This column refers to Commercial service status. While Republic Services uses a standard red-tag reporting template across all its service jurisdictions, the City of Rolling Hills does not have commercial waste service. Therefore, entries under “COMM” are marked as “NO” for applicable red tags within the City.

CONCLUSION
The Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports are essential tools for the City of Rolling Hills to monitor recycling performance, ensure regulatory compliance, maintain service quality, and promote transparency and continuous improvement in waste management services.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Receive and file.

Attachments:

1. VC_REP_250525_May_Tonnage Report

2. VC_REP_250525_May_C&D Report

3. VC_REP_250525_May_CallLog

4. VC_REP_250519_May_CityComplaintList_Redacted

5. VC_REP_250525_May_RedTagReport

6. VC_REP_250529_May_CityRedTagList

7. VC_REP_250625_June_TonnageReport

8. VC_REP_250625_June_C&DReport

9. VC_REP_250625_June_Call Log

Page 19 of 297 ends

Year 2025
Diversion Requirement Y
Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 Greenwaste 128.08 128.08 - 100.00%
Greenwaste - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 1.63 1.63 - 100.00% Trash 189.31 - 189.31 0.00%
Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 10.51 - 10.51 0.00% 1 Total 329.53 129.71 199.82 39.36%
2 Greenwaste 102.30 102.30 - 100.00%
Greenwaste - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 8.54 8.54 - 100.00% Recycle 4.35 2.02 2.33 46.46%
Trash 181.14 - 181.14 0.00%
Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 16.57 - 16.57 0.00% 2 Total 312.90 112.86 200.04 36.07%
3 Greenwaste 110.94 110.94 - 100.00%
Recycle 14.41 7.66 6.75 53.17%
Trash 199.27 - 199.27 0.00%
3 Total 324.62 118.60 206.02 36.54%
4 Greenwaste 81.53 81.53 - 100.00%
Recycle 0.28 0.13 0.15 48.11%
Trash 201.63 - 201.63 0.00%
Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 19.37 - 19.37 0.00% 4 Total 302.81 81.66 221.15 26.97%
5 Greenwaste 85.39 85.39 - 100.00%
Recycle 11.61 5.69 5.92 49.00%
Trash 214.00 - 214.00 0.00%
5 Total 311.00 91.08 219.92 29.29%
Grand Total 1,580.86 533.92 1,046.94 33.77%

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE
2025

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 20 of 297 ends

Year 2025
Diversion Requirement N
Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 C&D 10.85 8.71 2.14 80.24%
Greenwaste 14.33 14.33 - 100.00%
Recycle 0.20 0.08 0.12 41.79%
Trash 56.68 - 56.68 0.00%
1 Total 82.06 23.12 58.94 28.17%
2 C&D 5.26 4.22 1.04 80.24%
Recycle 0.19 0.09 0.10 46.46%
Trash 21.78 - 21.78 0.00%
2 Total 27.23 4.31 22.92 15.82%
3 C&D 3.67 2.94 0.73 80.24%
Greenwaste 9.52 9.52 - 100.00%
Recycle 0.33 0.17 0.16 52.66%
Trash 58.05 - 58.05 0.00%
3 Total 71.57 12.64 58.93 17.66%
4 C&D 26.23 23.13 3.10 88.20%
Recycle 0.21 0.10 0.11 48.11%
Trash 18.30 - 18.30 0.00%
4 Total 44.74 23.23 21.51 51.93%
5 Recycle 0.22 0.10 0.12 46.21%
Trash 31.39 - 31.39 0.00%
Organics 0.04 0.03 0.01 69.07%
5 Total 31.65 0.13 31.52 0.40%
Grand Total 257.24 63.43 193.81 24.66%

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NON-FRANCHISE
2025

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 21 of 297 ends

Republic Services City of Rolling Hills
C&D Report Reporting Period May-25
Disposal Site Material Loads Taken Tons Collected
*No C&D to report this month
Summary
Row Labels Sum of Tons Collected
(blank)
Grand Total

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 22 of 297 ends

Republic Services Call Log Report
City: Rolling Hills
Year 2025
Month/Quarter 5
Summary of Calls by Type
Final Call
Final Call Type Sub-Type Total

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Yard Waste - Residential 1

3.Missed Pick Up Total 1
Grand Total 1
Final Call Type Sub-Type Case Number
Date/Time
Opened
Date/Time
Closed
Created
By Request Description Resolution Comments Customer Category Account Number Site Account Name Site Address Phone

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Yard Waste - Residential 20250506-214812601 5/6/2025 8:24
AM
(blank)
Juan
Romero
Jimenez
(blank) (blank) RESI 9020003284 1 RESIDENT
7 QUAIL RIDGE RD S

ROLLING HILLS CA
(000) 000-0000
Pg 1 of 1

Page 23 of 297 ends

City of Rolling Hills - May 2025 Republic Services Complaint Log Date of
Issue
Time Issue/Complaint Resident Name Resident Address Republic contacted Republic Reponse Date Reponse
Time of
Reponse
Resolved
5/8/2025 12:01PM Missed Green Waste Pickup for 3 Months 17 Chuckwagon Rd. Tanasha Malone Tanasha Malone 5/9/2025 6:50AM Yes 5/9/2025 9:18AM Missed Trash Pickup 9 Upper Blackwater Canyon Tanasha Malone Tanasha Malone 5/9/2025 Yes 5/15/2025 9:30AM Missed Trash/ Green Waste Pickup For Over a Week 1 Buggywhip Dr. Tanasha Malone Tanasha Malone 5/15/2025 Yes

Page 24 of 297 ends

Rolling Hills Red Tags – May 2025
Date Address Code Issue COMM
5/27/2025 23 PORTUGESE RD 2 PLACEMENT NO
5/30/2025 18 BUGGYWHIP DR 9 HAZARDOUS WASTE NO

Page 25 of 297 ends

City of Rolling Hills- May 2025 Republic Services Red Tag List Republic Services - Red Tag List
Date of
Issue
Time Issue
Resident
Name
Resident
Address
Republic
contacted
Republic
Reponse
Date
Reponse
Time of
Reponse
Resolved
5/9/2025 7:02AM Red Tag: Green Waste Overloaded
5/9/2025 7:05AM Red Tag: Driveway Access Blocked

Page 26 of 297 ends

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE
2025

Page 1 of 2 ends

Page 27 of 297 ends

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NON-FRANCHISE
2025

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 28 of 297 ends

Republic Services City of Rolling Hills
C&D Report Reporting Period June-25
Disposal Site Material Loads Taken Tons Collected
CWS C&D 1 11.76
Summary
Row Labels Sum of Tons Collected
C&D 11.76
Grand Total 11.76

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 29 of 297 ends

Republic Services Call Log Report
City: Rolling Hills
Year 2025
Month/Quarter 6
Summary of Calls by Type
Final Call
Final Call Type Sub-Type Total

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Bulk Service 2

3.Missed Pick Up Total 2
Grand Total 2
Final Call Type Sub-Type Case Number
Date/Time
Opened
Date/Time
Closed
Created
By Request Description Resolution Comments Customer Category Account Number Site Account Name Site Address Phone

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Bulk Service 20250624-217764816 6/24/2025
7:59 AM
(blank) Cheryl
Fortson
(blank) (blank) RESI 9020002997 1 RESIDENT
2 MIDDLERIDGE LN S

ROLLING HILLS CA
(000) 000-0000
Pg 1 of 2

Page 30 of 297 ends

Republic Services Call Log Report
Final Call Type Sub-Type Case Number
Date/Time
Opened
Date/Time
Closed
Created
By Request Description Resolution Comments Customer Category Account Number Site Account Name Site Address Phone

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Bulk Service 20250625-217916704 6/25/2025
3:39 PM
6/27/2025
10:38 PM
Brieana
Smith (blank) (blank) RESI 9020002997 1 RESIDENT
2 MIDDLERIDGE LN S

ROLLING HILLS CA
(000) 000-0000
Pg 2 of 2

Page 31 of 297 ends

Item: 8.F.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: For Second Reading and Adoption: Adopt by Title Only Ordinance No. 386 amending Chapter 17.16 of the Municipal Code regarding the height limits of single-family residential homes, stables and barns; and finding the action to be statutorily exempt from CEQA under section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code Background:

On May 28, 2025, the City Council received a presentation from staff outlining the Planning Commission’s recommendations regarding height limits for single-family residences, stables, and barns. Following the presentation, Ordinance No. 386 was introduced, proposing amendments to Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 and 17.16.080 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to formally establish these height limits. The Ordinance was scheduled for second reading and adoption on the June 9, 2025, consent calendar. However, during that meeting, Mayor Pieper requested that the item be pulled for further discussion. The Mayor expressed concerns about the proposed height limit and recommended increasing the maximum height from 18 feet to 21 feet, measured from the finished floor to the peak of the structure, for homes, barns, and stables. Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer also requested revisions to clarify the language of the ordinance.

On June 23, 2025, staff presented the updated ordinance language for the City Council’s consideration and First Reading (Attachment B). The City Council voted 4-1, with Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer dissenting, to maintain the proposed ordinance’s home height at 21 feet, raise the barns/stable height to 23 feet, modify language to clarify exceptions to one-story general limitations, and re-introduce for first reading with proposed changes. The Ordinance is before the Council for second reading and adoption.

This evening, Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment A) is presented for second reading and adoption. If adopted, the Ordinance will take effect on August 28, 2025.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Page 32 of 297 ends

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A3

2. Attachment B CL_AGN_250623_CC_Item12B_Ord386_BuildHeights_AR_Packet

Page 33 of 297 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly singlestory California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.

Page 34 of 297 ends

2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact.

Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 21’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 23’; see Section 17.16.080
Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

Page 35 of 297 ends

2. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story general limitation specified in the first paragraph of Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance..

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof.

Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF JULY 2025.

Page 36 of 297 ends

4 JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

Page 37 of 297 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I, Christian Horvath, City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 386 was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills held on the 28th day of July, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Christian Horvath
City Clerk

Page 38 of 297 ends

Agenda Item No.: 12.B
Mtg. Date: 06/23/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 386 AMENDING CHAPTER

17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: June 23, 2025
BACKGROUND:

The Ordinance was scheduled for second reading and adoption on the June 9, 2025, consent calendar. However, during that meeting, Mayor Pieper requested that the item be pulled for further discussion. The Mayor expressed concerns about the proposed height limit and recommended increasing the maximum height from 18 feet to 21 feet, measured from the finished floor to the peak of the structure, for homes, barns, and stables.

Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer also requested revisions to clarify the ordinance language, specifically, to ensure that attic or storage space within a structure does not count toward the 21-foot height limit. She further asked that staff clearly identify acceptable architectural styles or design features consistent with City expectations.

As a result of these proposed substantive changes, the ordinance must return for further review and reintroduction. Staff and the City Attorney have since met to revise the language in response to the Council’s direction. A redline version of requested changes is provided (Attachment 02).

This evening, staff is presenting the updated ordinance language for City Council’s 1

Page 39 of 297 ends

consideration. If the revisions are acceptable, staff will bring the ordinance back for a second reading and adoption at the July 7, 2025, City Council meeting.

DISCUSSION:

Staff, in coordination with the City Attorney, revised the ordinance language in response to Mayor Pieper’s request to increase the allowable height for homes, barns, and stables, as well as Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer’s request for clarification. Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment 1) proposes amendments to Chapter 17.16, specifically Sections 17.16.060 and 17.16.080 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, to establish updated height limits for single-family residences, stables, and barns.

Ordinance Text as Presented on June 9
The revised language is reflected in the proposed amendment to Section 17.16.060 (Lot Area and Dimensions), with additions shown in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns which shall be no greater than 20’
Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.
2

Page 40 of 297 ends

Updated Ordinance Text for Consideration
A clean version of the updated ordinance text is provided below. Attachment 2 includes the proposed changes, with additions shown in blue text and deletions indicated by red strikethrough. It is important to note that any underlined text is considered new language.

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limited
One story, no greater than 21’ (mezzanines
and lofts are not permitted) except for stables
and barns); see Section 17.16.080

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of any building or structure shall be no greater than twenty-one (21) feet; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns (inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of projecting architectural features as defined in Section 17.12.160.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A.pdf
3

Page 41 of 297 ends

Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_F_A_Change-ProRedline.pdf Attachment 03 - CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item11A.pdf
4

Page 42 of 297 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

Page 43 of 297 ends

2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 21’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns); see
Section 17.16.080
Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
6

Page 44 of 297 ends

3 1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of any building or structure shall be no greater than twenty-one (21) feet; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns (inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of projecting architectural features as defined in Section 17.12.160.
2, The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025. 7

Page 45 of 297 ends

4 JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

Page 46 of 297 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single-story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
9

Page 47 of 297 ends

2 RA-S-1
Development Standard
RA-S-2
Zone District

4. Height Limitation
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

One story, no greater than 1821’ (mezzanines and lofts
are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’); see Section 17.16.080
Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
10

Page 48 of 297 ends

1. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of theany building or structure shall be no greater than eighteentwenty-one (1821) feet except that; and in no event shall the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20)(inclusive of any loft or storage area) exceed twenty-one (21) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure,. For purposes of this subsection (A)(1), the height measurement shall be exclusive of accessoryprojecting architectural features as determined by the City. defined in Section 17.12.160.
2, The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any building or structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions: The following exceptions shall apply to the one-story limit specified in Section (A) above:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter

17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

Page 49 of 297 ends

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________

Page 50 of 297 ends

0 Table Insert
Changes:
0 Table Delete 0
Add
Intelligent Table Comparison: Active
Table moves to
14 0
Summary report:

Litera Compare for Word 11.10.1.2 Document comparison done on 6/19/2025 1:50:20 PM
Table moves from 0
Delete
Embedded Graphics (Visio, ChemDraw, Images etc.)
10 0
Original DMS: iw://bbklaw-mobility.imanage.work/IMANAGE/43895839/1 Embedded Excel 0
Move From
Format changes
0 0
Total Changes:

Modified DMS: iw://bbklaw-mobility.imanage.work/IMANAGE/43895839/2 24 Move To
Style name: Default Style
13

Page 51 of 297 ends

Agenda Item No.: 11.A
Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16

OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND

FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA
UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: May 28, 2025
BACKGROUND:

Over the past several months, the Planning Commission has been reviewing the City’s regulations related to building height limitations for residential structures, barns, and stables.

The intent of this review was to clarify standards and ensure consistency with the City’s rural character and development goals.

On October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a report on the City's regulations related to building height limitations. At that time, the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) did not specify numeric height limits for these structures. However, the RHMC did state that “a building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another” (Attachment 3). The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 9.

At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed staff’s report on existing development patterns and relevant RHMC provisions. Following discussion, the Commission directed staff to prepare a code amendment establishing maximum ridge heights of 18 feet for single-family residences and 20 feet for barns and stables. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 10.

On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the draft ordinance (Attachment 1) and voted 4-0 (with Commissioner Kirkpatrick absent) to adopt Resolution No. 2025-04 (Attachment 2), recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 17.16 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to codify these height limits. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 11. 1426

Page 52 of 297 ends

This evening, staff is requesting City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment 1), which proposes clear regulations regarding maximum allowable structure heights. This ordinance is intended to preserve the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character of the community. As the City continues to grow, the proposed height limits would help ensure that new development remains consistent with the community’s established aesthetic values and overall harmony.

DISCUSSION:

In recent years, there has been a trend toward increased structure heights and overall massing. At both the October 15, 2024 and March 18, 2025 Planning Commission meetings, staff presented relevant sections of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) addressing height regulations. This allowed the Commissioners to consider these provisions and develop a recommendation for City Council review. To further support the Commission’s efforts, staff conducted research on building heights within the City. The data, compiled from approved plans between 2017 and 2024, includes both residences and stables. Heights ranged from 11 to 25 feet, with some newer structures exceeding 25 feet (Attachment 4). Notably, in 2023 and 2024, there has been a trend toward taller stables, many of which fall within the 20 to 25-foot range.

The following sections from the RHMC were reviewed and considered as part of this effort:

Basements - RHMC Chapter 17.12 – Definitions
Basements are located below ground and are often not visible. Homes may include multiple basement levels. Basement walls—except those within light wells—may not exceed 5 feet in height and must maintain an average height of no more than 2.5 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the exterior of the basement (Attachment 5).

Stables & Lofts
Stables are considered a valuable asset to each property and contribute significantly to the City’s rural, equestrian character. Based on staff research, the RHMC does not establish a specific height limit for stables. Over the past five years, stables have been trending taller.

While the average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is approximately 17 feet, the tallest stable recorded was 25 feet. Many stables also include lofts, as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060.

These lofts, which may resemble second stories, must have a plate height that does not exceed 7 feet. They are intended for hay and equipment storage or use as a tack room and may not contain sleeping quarters (Attachment 6).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries larger than 200 square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 7).

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." Storage areas may be located above or below a story but are not intended to be livable spaces. As such, they cannot include exterior doors, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. The height of a storage area may not exceed 6 feet at any point. Attics may have ceilings that follow the angle of the roofline, which can exceed 6 feet at the peak; however, staff reviews plans to ensure that staircases are not shown leading 1527

Page 53 of 297 ends

to attic storage areas (Attachment 5).

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) – RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 For detached ADUs on lots with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling, the maximum height is limited to 16 feet. This height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor—whichever is lower—to the structure’s peak. If the ADU is attached to the primary dwelling, it may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone, whichever is lower (Attachment 8).

Based on the information presented, the Planning Commission discussed building heights for residential structures, barns, and stables. At the conclusion of these discussions, the Commissioners agreed that a maximum residential building height of 18 feet was reasonable.

For barns and stables, the Commissioners shared the heights of stables on their own properties and used a practical approach to estimate the necessary height to accommodate stall areas and tack room or loft space. This resulted in a consensus that a 20-foot height was appropriate for barns and stables.

Below is language that the City Council is considering this evening:

Municipal Ordinance No. 386
The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows:

Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by 1628

Page 54 of 297 ends

a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Notice of Public Hearing
This item was publicly noticed in the Daily Breeze on May 1, 2025 (Attachment 11).

Public Comment
As of the date of this report, no public comments have been received.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion:

Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17; and introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 386 regarding the height limits of single-family residential homes, stables and barns.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf
Attachment 02 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit_F_E.pdf Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_STAFF REPORT OF HEIGHTS.pdf
Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions_Basements.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 07 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 08 -
PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 09 - CL_AGN_241015_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf
Attachment 10 - CL_AGN_250318_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf
Attachment 11 - CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10C_SR.pdf
Attachment 12 - CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance_Affidavit.pdf 1729

Page 55 of 297 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

Page 56 of 297 ends

2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’

Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
1931

Page 57 of 297 ends

3 The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
2032

Page 58 of 297 ends

4 ATTEST:
____________________________________

Page 59 of 297 ends

2234

Page 60 of 297 ends

2335

Page 61 of 297 ends

2436

Page 62 of 297 ends

2537

Page 63 of 297 ends

2638

Page 64 of 297 ends

2739

Page 65 of 297 ends

Building Heights Report

RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE
2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable
2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable
2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home
2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home
2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable
2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home
2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable
2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home
2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home
2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home
2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home
2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home
2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home
2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home
2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home
2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home
Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home
2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House
2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home
2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola)
2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage
2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable
2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home
2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU
2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House
2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House
2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU
2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable
2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable
Average 17
High 25
Low 11
2840

Page 66 of 297 ends

Building Heights Report

Page 67 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 2 ends

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

Barn. See "stable."
"Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells, basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story. "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or materials of any kind or nature.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.
"Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles, other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses, but excludes sleeping quarters.

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

Page 68 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 2 of 2 ends

"Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.
"Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 3143

Page 69 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 3 ends

17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit.

All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

A. General requirements and uses:

1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only.

2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line.

3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5).

4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure.

5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter.

6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls.

7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable.

9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto:

1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable.

2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 3244

Page 70 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 2 of 3 ends

4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals.

C. Tack Room Space.

1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter.

2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet.

4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds.

5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling.

6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings.

7. Tack room may have standard size doors.

8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets.

9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet.

10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications.

11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals.

12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section.

D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable.

1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance.

2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high.

3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door.

4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited.

5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements.

6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 3345

Page 71 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 3 of 3 ends

7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses.

E. Loft Space within a Stable.

1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure.

2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)).

3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property.

4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed.

5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet.

6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface.

7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013)
3446

Page 72 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit.

All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements.

2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet.

3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1.

4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line.

5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots.

6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16.

8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 3547

Page 73 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements.

B. Height.

1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height.

2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit.

3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height.

4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories.

5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 3648

Page 74 of 297 ends

Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 10/15/2024
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: JOHN F. SIGNO, AICP,
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION ON BUILDING HEIGHT
DATE: October 15, 2024
BACKGROUND:

Recently, there has been discussion about the City's height limitation allowed. Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachments 1 and 2).

DISCUSSION:

Basements
Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are allowed to have multiple basement levels. A portion of the basement may daylight provided it does not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior.

Lofts
Many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.12.120 (Attachment 2).

These lofts often appear to be second stories and can reach a height of 25 feet (Attachment 3). Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room provided there are no sleeping quarters.

Lofts may also be found in some residences and may be legal if they were built prior to the City's incorporation in 1957. Additionally, residences in the Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) have steeper pitched roofs to meet architectural standards for a colonial building, which is a standard imposed by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Lofts are not allowed in the OZD-1 district, but many have attic spaces converted to a loft or second story because of the high ceiling heights.

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as a "space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or 1 3749

Page 75 of 297 ends

below a story, but is not meant to be livable and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff reviews plans to make sure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic.

Conclusion
The Planning Commission should discuss if the height requirement in the Code is adequate. If not, the Commission can make recommendations to improve or amend the height requirement to be considered at a later date.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation..pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_STA_Stable_Comparison.pdf
2 3850

Page 76 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:26 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.16.080 Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one‐half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one‐story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993). (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7‐15‐2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6‐11‐2012) 3951

Page 77 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 2 ends

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

Page 78 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 79 of 297 ends

STABLE COMPARISON
Address Size (SF) Height
(Ft.)
Yr.

Approved
Notes
9 PBR 1,334 21.4 2023
74 PBR 960 11 2023
8 Middleridge Ln S 750 13 2022
29 Crest Rd W 900 13.5 2022 Originally approved for 934 SF 8 Quail Ridge Rd N 2,780 25 2021 Plus 7' cupola = 32'
8 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd 1,875 12 2021 Approx. height
15 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 935 20.8 2021
13 PBR 3,360 24 2019
1 Poppy Trail 452 12.25 2019
20 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 3,575 20 2018
11 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 744 20 2017
7 Middleridge Lane S. 1,361 18.4 2017
6 Meadowlark Ln. 779 20 2017
11 Saddleback 2,340 19.5 2017 To top of cupola
5 Pine Tree Ln. 1,200 14 2017 Plus cupola = ~19'
10 Crest Rd. W 1,188 19.3 2016
77 Crest Rd. E 3,691 18.4 2016
9 Chuckwagon Rd. 2,088 21 2014
3 Meadowlark Ln. 840 19.6 2013
29 Middleridge Ln. S 2,960 23.4 2011
14 Portuguese Bend Rd. 918 18.5 2005 1st floor only
6 Possum Ridge Rd. 1,680 21.5 2003 1st floor only
23 Crest Rd. E 1,225 18.75 Proposed; not built
6 Saddleback Rd. 650 17
2 Meadowlark Ln. 239 18 1st floor only
11 Saddleback Road 2,414 16 2018
2 Possum Ridge 1,890 1994
29 Middleridge Ln. S 3,200 23.6 1996
4 Stormhill Lane 2,064 12.5
1 Pine Tree Lane 2,976 14.5 2015
1 Morgan Lane 4,038 24.9 1st Flr. 2,377 SF; 2nd Flr. 1,721 SF 4254

Page 80 of 297 ends

Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 03/18/2025
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL DISCUSSION

REGARDING BUILDING HEIGHTS
DATE: March 18, 2025
BACKGROUND:

On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s building height limitations. During the meeting, the Commission directed Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. The Commission subsequently recommended moving forward with the issue and scheduling it for further consideration.

This evening, Staff is seeking recommendations from the Planning Commission regarding height limits for structures, which will be presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff will need to provide public notice in advance of the Council’s review, which will require both a first and second hearing before any changes can be enacted.

DISCUSSION:

Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachment 1).

This evening, staff will provide an overview of existing height regulations for various structures, including single-story limits and exceptions for basements, stables, storage areas, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and aviaries. Additionally, the report highlights regulations the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) set, which further restrict plate heights and roof pitches through architectural review and deed restrictions.

The Planning Commission is being asked to review these existing regulations and provide 1 4355

Page 81 of 297 ends

direction on potential modifications to height limits for structures within the City. Any recommended changes will require public notice and City Council approval through a twohearing process before they can be enacted.

Basements
Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are permitted to have multiple basement levels. Basement walls, except for walls within light wells, may not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior (Attachment 2).

Stables & Lofts
Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola). (Attachment 3)
However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5).

Storage Areas
RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or below a story but is not meant to be a livable space and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed 6 feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than 6 feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff review plans to ensure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic (Attachment 2).

ADU
Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure.

An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 6).

The Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has building regulations that have 2 4456

Page 82 of 297 ends

restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches. The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by-case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7).

RHCA- Plate Height
The standard plate height for structures in the RHCA Building Regulations is 8’6”, measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam at the porch. Residences may have taller plate heights, but the heights must meet the following restrictions: a minimum of 50% of the residence must have a plate height of 8’6” or lower, up to 30% of the residence may have a 9’6” plate height and up to 20% of the residence may have a maximum of 10’6” plate height.

The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012.

RHCA- Roof Pitches
The standard roof pitch for all structures in 4:12. The Building Regulations allow a minimum pitch of 3:12 for contemporary designs with hip roofs and a maximum 4½:12 pitch traditional designs. The roof pitch is also considered on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSION:

Staff is seeking the Planning Commission’s recommendations on whether the current height limitations in the RHMC effectively preserve the City’s rural, equestrian character while allowing for reasonable development. The discussion should evaluate whether these regulations strike the right balance between community aesthetics and the functional needs of structures such as stables, storage areas, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs).

Additionally, the Commission may wish to address the increasing size of stables, the limitations on lofts and storage areas, and the prescribed height allowances for basements and ADUs that align with the City's long-term vision.

If the Commission finds that the current height regulations are insufficient, it may provide direction on potential amendments or improvements. This could include adjusting height limits for specific structures, refining definitions to prevent unintended interpretations, or establishing clearer guidelines for review and enforcement. Any recommended changes will require further public input and City Council approval.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Discuss and provide direction staff to make height limit.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation.pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 4: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf 3 4557

Page 83 of 297 ends

Attachment 5: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 6:

PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 7: PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC&Rs_Building.Heights.pdf 4 4658

Page 84 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.16.080 Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993). (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6-11-2012) 4759

Page 85 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 2 ends

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

Page 86 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 87 of 297 ends

Building Heights Report

Page 88 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 3 ends

17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit.

All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

A. General requirements and uses:

1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only.

3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5).

6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls.

8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable.

9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto:

1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable.

3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 5163

Page 89 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 2 of 3 ends

C. Tack Room Space.

2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds.

5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling.

6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings.

7. Tack room may have standard size doors.

8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets.

9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet.

10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications.

12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section.

D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable.

2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high.

3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door.

4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited.

5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements.

6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 5264

Page 90 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 3 of 3 ends

7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses.

E. Loft Space within a Stable.

1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure.

2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)).

3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property.

5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet.

6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface.

Page 91 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit.

All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements.

2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet.

3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1.

6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16.

Page 92 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements.

B. Height.

3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height.

5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 5567

Page 93 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHTS

DISCUSSION
Current Regulations:

To help maintain the low rambling nature of ranch architecture, plate heights are limited and strictly enforced. While the recommended plate height for a residence is 8’6”, taller plates are allowed on a case-by-case basis if harmonious with the design and massing of the overall residence.
i. Plate heights are measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam. (See Appendix L “Illustrations of Plate Height”)
ii. The following percentages are the allowable limits for plate heights above 8’6”:
(Percentages of plate height are calculated by the linear footage of the perimeter.) 1) Minimum of 50% of the residence must have plate heights of 8’6” or lower, 2) Up to 30% of the residence may have a plate height up to 9’6, ** 3) Only 20% of the residence may have a plate height up to 10’6. ** ** Maximum plate heights may be limited and are considered on a case-by-case basis to assure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind.

Attached is the current Appendix for plate heights as well additional examples for discussion. 5668

Page 94 of 297 ends

APPENDIX L

ILLUSTRATIONS OF PLATE HEIGHT
5769

Page 95 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT AT PORCH
If a porch is present, the plate height is
measured from the finish floor of the
residence to the top of the beam of the porch
5870

Page 96 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT @ STANDARD EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish
floor of the residence to the top plate, where the
eave rafter meets the top of the wall.
5971

Page 97 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT @ SOFFITED EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish floor
of the residence to where the soffited eave meets
the exterior wall.
6072

Page 98 of 297 ends

Agenda Item No.: 10.C
Mtg. Date: 04/15/2025
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING

COMMISSION
FROM: LISA EDWARDS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING

THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER
SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
DATE: April 15, 2025
BACKGROUND:

On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s regulations pertaining to building height limitations within the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code. The Commission tasked Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed Staff’s report and made a motion to direct Staff to draft a proposed municipal code ordinance amendment that includes a maximum ridge height for homes to 18 feet and a maximum ridge height for barns and stables, not including the cupola or other accessories, to 20 feet (5 -0 vote). At this time, Staff is requesting a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council regarding proposed height limits for structures that are incorporated in the draft resolution and ordinance attached hereto. Once the Commission provides its recommendation, the City Council will conduct a first and second reading of the proposal.

DISCUSSION:

The City is considering the introduction of a new ordinance (Ordinance No. 386) aimed at addressing building heights within the community (Attachment 1). This proposed ordinance seeks to establish clear regulations regarding the maximum allowable height for structures, with the goal of preserving the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character. As the City experiences growth and development, this measure would help ensure that new constructions align with the community’s aesthetic values while maintaining harmony with its surroundings. Public feedback and further discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the final version of this ordinance.
1 6173

Page 99 of 297 ends

Commissioner Discussion
During the last Planning Commission meeting, a discussion addressing the heights of residences and stables were both analyzed in order to establish maximum heights in the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). Historically, the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) had been the authority on structural heights for main homes, stables, and barns.

Although the Code mentions that the maximum height for any residence is one -story, it does not specify an exact height dimension. Similarly, the allowance of a loft within a barn (maximum 7-foot plate height for wall of loft) is mentioned, but no overall height is specified.

Although the Commission unanimously agreed that the residential height of 18 feet was reasonable, the focus of the discussion was primarily with regard to heights of barns and stables. Commissioners then shared stable heights on their own properties and used a logical calculation that would accommodate the stall areas, tack room/loft area, which landed at a 20- foot height.

Municipal Ordinance No. 386
The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows:

Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 & RA-S-2

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.

The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this 2 6274

Page 100 of 297 ends

section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

The following is a review of the Code Sections that address height:

Stables & Lofts
Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola) However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4).

Aviaries (Bird Homes)
Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5).

ADU
RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 7).

Building Heights Report
This report was compiled using building heights approved between 2017 and 2024 (see Attachment 8). The data was analyzed to assess the range of heights for both residences and stables, which varied from 11 to 25 feet. Notably, there has been a recent trend (2023–2024) 3 6375

Page 101 of 297 ends

of increasing stable heights, with many falling within the 20 to 25-foot range.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
RHCA – ADU
The RHCA has building regulations that have restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches.

The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by- case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7).

The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012 (Attachment 9).

Public Comment
No public responses have been received as of the date of this report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

RECOMMENDATION:

Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion:

Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance that is attached thereto as Exhibit “A.” ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 01 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit.pdf Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf
Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.12.190_Storage.pdf Attachment 07 -
4 6476

Page 102 of 297 ends

PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 08 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 09 - PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC_Rs_Building.Heights.pdf CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_Affidavit.pdf
5 6577

Page 103 of 297 ends

65277.00001\43665712.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE

CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17

OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND

THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE

ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM
CEQA.

17.50.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (“RHMC”), directed City staff to draft an ordinance updating the RHMC to impose a height limit on residential buildings; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2025, the City gave public notice of the public hearing for Ordinance No. 386 by publishing the required notice in a newspaper of general circulation and posting the notice at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning Ordinance No. 386.
6678

Page 104 of 297 ends

65277.00001\43665712.1

Page 2 of 4 ends

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. CEQA. The Planning Commission finds that the Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because it involves imposing a maximum building height on residential development and does not propose nor authorize any action that would have the potential to cause a physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 3. General Plan. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies:

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

SECTION 4. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing recitals and findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed Ordinance, attached as Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 5. Certification. The Planning Commission Chair shall sign and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution. 6779

Page 105 of 297 ends

65277.00001\43665712.1

Page 3 of 4 ends

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2025. __________________________

BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
_________________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
6880

Page 106 of 297 ends

65277.00001\43665712.1

Page 4 of 4 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-04 entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE CITY

COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
CHAPTERS 17.16 AND 17.17 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING

HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL

HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 15, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

And in compliance with the law of California was posted at the following:

Administrative Offices.
_______________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
6981

Page 107 of 297 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 386

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF

THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE

RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE
TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA.

WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly singlestory California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and
WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on _____, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 7082

Page 108 of 297 ends

2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design.

Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences.

By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment.

Development Standard Zone District
RA-S-1 RA-S-2

4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which
shall be no greater than 20’

Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows:

17.16.080 - Height limitation.

A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.
7183

Page 109 of 297 ends

3 The maximum height permitted from floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.

B. Exceptions:

1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.

2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.

3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025.

JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
7284

Page 110 of 297 ends

4 ATTEST:
____________________________________

Page 111 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 2 ends

DEFINITIONS

17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.

17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.

Cellar. See "basement."

17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.
"Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall.

Page 112 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 113 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 3 ends

17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit.

All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

A. General requirements and uses:

1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only.

3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5).

6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls.

8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable.

9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto:

1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable.

3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 7688

Page 114 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 2 of 3 ends

C. Tack Room Space.

2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans.

4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds.

5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling.

6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings.

7. Tack room may have standard size doors.

8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets.

9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet.

10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications.

12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section.

D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable.

2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high.

3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door.

4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited.

5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements.

6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 7789

Page 115 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 3 of 3 ends

7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses.

E. Loft Space within a Stable.

1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure.

2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)).

3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property.

5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet.

6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface.

Page 116 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit.

All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements:

1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements.

2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet.

3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1.

6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted.

7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16.

Page 117 of 297 ends

Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]
(Supp. No. 28)

Page 1 of 2 ends

DEFINITIONS

17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.
"Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain, equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human sleeping or commercial purposes.
"Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.
"Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 8092

Page 118 of 297 ends

Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST]
(Supp. No. 29, Update 1)

Page 1 of 1 ends

17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements.

B. Height.

3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height.

5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 8193

Page 119 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHTS

DISCUSSION
Current Regulations:

Attached is the current Appendix for plate heights as well additional examples for discussion. 8294

Page 120 of 297 ends

APPENDIX L

ILLUSTRATIONS OF PLATE HEIGHT
8395

Page 121 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT AT PORCH
If a porch is present, the plate height is
measured from the finish floor of the
residence to the top of the beam of the porch
8496

Page 122 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT @ STANDARD EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish
floor of the residence to the top plate, where the
eave rafter meets the top of the wall.
8597

Page 123 of 297 ends

PLATE HEIGHT @ SOFFITED EAVE
The plate height is measured from the finish floor
of the residence to where the soffited eave meets
the exterior wall.
8698

Page 124 of 297 ends

CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_F - Page 1 of 1
2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
[email protected]
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Account Number: 5007827
Ad Order Number: 0011726463
Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication: Daily Breeze
Publication Dates: 03/26/2025
Total Amount: $918.32
Payment Amount: $0.00
Amount Due: $918.32
Notice ID: 8mxWdV8ywb9uXnnqwaWl
Invoice Text: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN – Ordinance 386 is a City initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend various sections of Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Hearing Date: April 15, 2025 Hearing Time:
6:30p.m. Hearing Location: Rolling Hills Council Chambers 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Ordinance 386 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Zoning Code Amendment revises the height limit of single-family residential homes. Ordinance 386 includes revisions to Zoning Code Chapter 17.16 (Residential Agriculture-Suburban (RA-S) Zone) and Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District-1 (OZD-1)). The Planning Commission’s action serves as a recommendation to the City Council. Environmental Documentation: Ordinance 386 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable 8799

Page 125 of 297 ends

CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_F - Page 1 of 1
Daily Breeze
2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
0011726463
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Los Angeles
I am a citizen of the United States and
a resident of the County aforesaid; I
am over the age of eighteen years, and
not party to or interested in the aboveentitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Daily Breeze, a
newspaper of general circulation,
printed and published in the City of
Torrance*, County of Los Angeles, and
which newspaper has been adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation by the
Superior Court of County of Los
Angeles, State of California, under the
date of June 15, 1945, Decree No.

Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the
annexed is a printed copy (set in type
not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to wit:
03/26/2025
I certify (or declare) under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.

Dated at Hermosa Beach, California
On this 26th day of March, 2025.
______________________________
Signature
*Daily Breeze circulation includes the following
cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El
Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne,
Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale,
Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan
Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes,
Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes
Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa
Monica, Torrance and Wilmington
10088

Page 126 of 297 ends

CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance - Page 1 of 1
2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
[email protected]
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Account Number: 5007827
Ad Order Number: 0011733082
Customer's Reference/PO Number:

Publication: Daily Breeze
Publication Dates: 05/01/2025
Total Amount: $618.92
Payment Amount: $0.00
Amount Due: $618.92
Notice ID: aDJo7EbSRrk9RxdwVD4m
Invoice Text: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN–Ordinance 386 is a City initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend sections of Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Hearing Date: May 28, 2025 Hearing Time: 7:00 p.m. Hearing Location: Rolling Hills Council Chambers, 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Ordinance 386 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Zoning Code Amendment revises the height limit of single-family residential homes. Ordinance 386 includes revisions to Zoning Code Chapter 17.16 (Residential Agriculture-Suburban (RA-S) Zone). On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission voted to recommend Ordinance 386 to the City Council for approval.

Environmental Documentation: Ordinance 386 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the 10189

Page 127 of 297 ends

CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance - Page 1 of 1
Daily Breeze
2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329
Hermosa Beach, California 90254
(310) 543-6635
0011733082
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)

Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the
annexed is a printed copy (set in type
not smaller than nonpareil), has been
published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any
supplement thereof on the following
dates, to wit:
05/01/2025
I certify (or declare) under the penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.

Dated at Hermosa Beach, California
On this 1st day of May, 2025.
______________________________
Signature
*Daily Breeze circulation includes the following
cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El
Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne,
Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale,
Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan
Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes,
Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes
Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa
Monica, Torrance and Wilmington
10290

Page 128 of 297 ends

Item: 8.G.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Designate voting delegate and alternate voting delegate to the League Of California Cities Annual Conference from October 8-10 to be held in Long Beach, CA Background:

On July 16, 2025, staff received a letter and packet (Attachment A) from the League of California Cities (Cal Cities) requesting the designation of voting delegates and alternates to participate in the League's 2025 Annual Conference scheduled for October 8-10 in Long Beach, California. The Annual Business Meeting is scheduled for Friday, October 10. At this meeting, the Cal Cities membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish Cal Cities policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate. Each city may appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity.

For the annual conference held in October 2024, the City Council designated Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer as the voting delegate and Councilmember Wilson as the alternate. For the annual conferences between 2019 and 2023, the same members were designated voting and alternate voting delegates.

Discussion:

Councilmember Dieringer is currently serving as the City Council liaison to the California League of Cities. It is recommended that the City Council re-appoint Councilmember Dieringer as the designated voting delegate and Councilmember Wilson as the alternate voting delegate.

Fiscal Impact:

Voting delegates (or alternates if voting) must register for the Annual conference. They don't need to register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. The full conference rate for Member City officials is $725, and the one-day rate is $375.

The proposed Fiscal Year 25-26 budget includes funds for Councilmembers to attend conferences.

As of the current agenda posting, the full $7,500 remains in the recently adopted FY25/26 budget.

Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer's registration for this year's conference was purchased in June during FY24-25.

Page 129 of 297 ends

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. GV_GVO_250716_LCC_VotingDelegate_InfoPacket

Page 130 of 297 ends

1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org

DATE: Wednesday, July 16, 2025
TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 8-10, 2025 Long Beach Convention Center
Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.

Taking place on Oct. 10, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.

To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.

Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.

Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 24. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.

Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.

Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website.

Council Action Advised by September 24, 2025

Page 131 of 297 ends

For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.

Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.

Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.

Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 17, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 18, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.

The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.

Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.

Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 24. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].

Attachments:
• General Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly

Page 132 of 297 ends

1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines

1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.

2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.

3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.

4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.

5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.

6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.

Page 133 of 297 ends

Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.

How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.

The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.

The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.

Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.

Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.

Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.

Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.

The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.

Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.

Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.

During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.

Cal Cities policy
development is a memberinformed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.

For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.

General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f).

Page 134 of 297 ends

Item: 11.A.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Robert Samario, Finance Operations Lead Consultant Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: A Public Hearing to Consider and Adopt Resolution No. 1395 Authorizing Placement of Solid Waste Service Charges Owed to Republic Services Pursuant to its Solid Waste Franchise with the City of Rolling Hills on the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller's Office Annual Tax Roll
Background:

Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 8.08 of Title 8 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470, the City Council is authorized to levy the annual sanitation service charge and to have such charge collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

Discussion:

The following is a summary of the services and activities associated with the sanitation charge:

To protect public health and safety, Contractor shall provide and maintain all labor, equipment, material, supplies, supervision, and all other items necessary for the Collection of all Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, Green Waste, Bulky Items, and Brush generated or accumulated within the City from Residential Premises and City Facilities. The services provided by the Contractor under this Agreement shall be performed in a thorough and professional manner so that all Customers are provided at all times with reliable, courteous, and high-quality Solid Waste Management Services.

Contractor shall collect all properly placed Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic Waste from the designated collection location of every residential premises in the City twice each week.

Each year in spring, and again in the fall, Contractor shall collect an unlimited amount of Bulky Items and Green Waste from the designated collection location. In addition to the semi-annual Bulky Item and Green Waste Collection events, Contractor shall provide Customers with on-call Collection for Bulky Items upon request. Contractor shall collect one (1) Bulky Item per calendar year from each Residential Premises at no charge on an on-call basis. Contractor will provide additional services as outlined in the Agreement for Residential Solid Waste Management Services.

For Fiscal Year 2025-26, the sanitation charge will be $1,503.72 per parcel. The $1,503.72 per parcel was established based on the actual costs to provide refuse services. The enclosed Report contains

Page 135 of 297 ends

detailed information about the annual charge and the charge to be applied to the parcels. The City Council may order the implementation of a City sanitation service charge on the FY 2025-26 property tax rolls by adopting the enclosed Resolution with the attached Report. Council action on the staff recommendation is required in order to place the annual charge on the tax roll. A notice of the July 28, 2025, public hearing was published in the Daily Breeze on July 8, 2025 (Attachment E).

Fiscal Impact:

The anticipated total revenue is approximately $1,055,603 which is included in the 2025-26 Budget.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing and subsequently adopt Resolution No. 1395 placing the sanitation service charge on the annual County of Los Angeles Tax Roll.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - ResolutionNo1395_FY25-26_AnnualRefuseAssessment

2. Attachment B - CL_AGN_250728_CC_CoRH_ParcelMap_200724_WithRoads

3. Attachment C - CL_AGN_250728_CC_FY25-26_AnnualSanitationReport

4. Attachment D - CL_AGN_250728_CC_FY25-26_TaxRoll

5. Attachment E - CL_PBN_250728_PH_CC_FY25-26_RefuseDirectAssessmentBilling_Affidavit

Page 136 of 297 ends

-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 1395

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF ROLLING HILLS CONFIRMING THE LEVYING OF

AN ANNUAL SANITATION (GARBAGE AND REFUSE

COLLECTION) SERVICE CHARGE FOR FISCAL YEAR
2025-26 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8.08 OF TITLE 8 OF

THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE AND

FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 8.08 of Title 8 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Article 4 of Chapter 6 of Part 3 of Division 5 of the California Health and Safety Code, commencing with Section 5470, the City Council is authorized to levy the annual sanitation service charge (the "Charge") and to have such Charge collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, the general taxes of the City.

SECTION 2. The City Manager prepared and filed a written report containing a description of each parcel of real property within the City to which the Charge is applicable (the “Identified Parcels”) and the amount of the Charge for each such Identified Parcel for fiscal year 2025-2026 in conformity with Section 8.08.230 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and approved such Report as filed.

SECTION 3. Following notice duly given in accordance with law, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the levy and collection of the proposed charge for fiscal year 2025-26. All interested persons were afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard. The City Council considered all oral statements and all written protests made or filed by any interested person. A majority protest does not exist against the annual levy of the sanitation service charge and all oral and written protests to the levy and collection of the proposed charge for fiscal year 2025-26 are hereby overruled by the City Council.

SECTION 4 Based upon its review of the Report, a copy of which has been presented to the City Council and which has been filed with the City Clerk, the City Council hereby finds and determines that (i) each parcel in the City benefits from receiving sanitation service (ii) the net amount to be assessed upon each parcel of real property for fiscal year 2025-26 in accordance with the Report is apportioned by a formula and method that fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits received by each parcel, and (iii) no charge is imposed on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the benefits conferred on that parcel.

SECTION 5. Parcels that are owned or used by any county, city, city and county, special district or any other local governmental entity, the State of California or the United States

Page 137 of 297 ends

-2-
shall be charged unless the City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that such parcels receive no benefit from the proposed service.

SECTION 6. As set forth in the Report, the annual sanitation service charge is in compliance with the provisions of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual charge pursuant to the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

SECTION 7. The annual sanitation service charge is levied without regard to property valuation.

SECTION 8. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the cost of the service that is financed by the annual sanitation service charge for fiscal year 2025-26 is approximately $1,055,603.

SECTION 9. The City Council hereby determines and imposes the annual sanitation service charge for fiscal year 2025-26, at the rates set forth in the Report of $1,503.72 per parcel, which is in compliance with the provisions of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal code and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

SECTION 10. The adoption of this resolution constitutes the levy of an annual sanitation service charge against parcels of property in the City of Rolling Hills for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2026.

SECTION 11. This action is statutorily exempt from the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15378 and Section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) because (i) the increase in charges are for the purpose of meeting operational and maintenance expenses of the aforementioned services and (ii) the charges constitute the creation of a funding mechanism/other governmental fiscal activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in potential significant physical impact on the environment.

SECTION 12. The County Auditor of Los Angeles County shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each parcel of land the amount of the annual sanitation service charge, and such charge, and each installment of the charge, shall be collected in the same manner, and shall be subject to the same penalties and priority of lien as, other charges and taxes fixed and collected by, or on behalf of the City. After collection by the County, the net amount of the charge, after deduction of any compensation due the County, shall be paid to the Finance Director.

SECTION 13. The Finance Director shall deposit all money representing charges collected by the County to the credit of the Rolling Hills Refuse Fund.

Page 138 of 297 ends

-3-
SECTION 14. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file the Boundary Diagram and the list of actual Parcel Charges (a listing of the Assessor's Parcel Numbers and the amount to be levied on each parcel) with the County Auditor, together with a certified copy of this Resolution upon its adoption, in addition to any additional information the County Auditor required to collect the charge with the County taxes.

SECTION 15. A certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the Report and the actual Parcel Charges (a listing of the Assessor's Parcel Numbers and the amount to be levied on each parcel) shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of July 2025. ________________________________
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Christian Horvath
City Clerk

Page 139 of 297 ends

7567-011-020
7569-012-008
7569-012-019
7567-001-010
7567-002-019
7567-002-021
7567-003-050
7567-002-023
7569-015-007
7567-017-035
7567-003-033
7567-004-033
7567-017-018
7567-007-007
7567-009-018
7567-009-027
7569-018-002
7569-021-005
7569-011-012
7569-024-015
7569-026-012
7569-013-012
7567-002-008
7567-006-037
7567-008-018
7567-002-029
7567-006-034
7567-007-004
7567-007-013
7567-007-021
7567-008-008
7567-008-011
7567-008-014
7567-009-007
7567-009-022
7567-018-016
7567-018-021 7567-018-025
7567-018-032
7567-002-027
7567-006-033
7567-007-008
7567-007-010
7567-007-012
7567-007-014
7567-007-017
7567-007-018
7567-007-019
7567-008-009
7567-008-015
7567-008-019
7567-009-006
7567-009-014
7567-009-015
7567-009-023
7567-018-017 7567-018-018
7567-018-020
7567-018-023
7567-018-028
7567-018-034
7569-007-008
7567-002-017
7567-002-028
7567-006-031
7567-006-035
7567-007-011
7567-007-016
7567-007-025
7567-008-016
7567-009-009
7567-009-010
7567-009-012
7567-009-017
7567-009-021
7567-018-014
7567-018-019
7567-018-024
7567-018-029
7567-018-030
7567-018-033
7567-018-037
7569-005-015
7569-006-001
7567-006-030
7567-006-032
7567-006-036
7567-006-038
7567-007-006
7567-007-015
7567-007-020
7567-007-022
7567-007-024
7567-008-007
7567-009-005
7567-009-019
7567-018-022
7567-018-036
7569-005-014
7569-005-016
7569-006-007
7569-007-002
7569-007-003
7569-007-010
7569-006-006
7569-007-009
7567-009-039
7567-009-032
7567-009-033
7567-009-031
7567-009-035
7567-009-038
7569-004-016
7569-004-026
7569-001-023
7569-001-036
7569-002-006
7569-002-014
7569-002-016
7569-003-001
7569-004-005
7569-004-015 7569-004-025
7569-005-008
7569-001-025
7569-001-026
7569-001-033
7569-002-005
7569-002-007
7569-002-010
7569-002-012
7569-002-017
7569-002-018
7569-003-006
7569-003-013
7569-004-002
7569-004-012
7569-004-013
7569-004-020
7569-004-021
7569-005-004
7567-017-033
7567-017-038
7567-017-039
7567-017-040
7567-017-042
7567-017-048
7567-018-001
7567-018-006
7567-018-011
7569-004-010
7569-001-030
7569-001-032
7569-002-015
7569-003-003
7569-003-011
7569-004-006
7569-004-017
7569-004-018
7569-005-001
7569-005-003
7569-005-006
7569-005-010
7567-010-009
7567-017-036
7567-017-041
7567-017-046
7567-017-047
7567-018-004
7567-018-005
7567-018-009
7569-001-028
7569-001-029
7569-001-034
7569-001-035
7569-002-002
7569-002-008
7569-002-011
7569-002-013
7569-003-002
7569-004-004
7569-004-024
7569-005-002
7569-005-007
7569-005-013
7567-010-012
7567-017-034
7567-017-044
7567-018-002
7567-018-003
7567-018-008
7567-018-013
7567-010-013
7567-017-045
7567-017-051
7567-018-012
7567-002-005
7567-002-014
7567-001-004
7567-001-007
7567-001-016
7567-002-006
7567-002-011
7567-002-015
7567-001-006
7567-001-014
7567-002-004
7567-002-009
7567-002-013
7567-001-013
7567-001-017
7567-002-007
7567-002-016
7567-002-024
7567-002-018
7567-002-020
7567-002-022
7567-002-025
7567-009-025
7567-009-029
7567-009-030
7567-002-026
7567-009-024
7567-009-026
7567-009-028
7567-017-020
7567-001-904
7567-017-900
7569-003-904
7567-001-902
7567-003-011
7567-005-036
7567-003-052
7567-004-009
7569-003-010
7567-012-016
7567-004-016
7567-004-041
7567-004-037
7567-015-037
7567-017-052
7567-003-030
7567-018-015
7567-018-031
7567-006-002
7567-009-013
7567-017-037
7567-009-016
7567-002-033
7567-003-008
7567-003-012
7567-003-016
7567-003-020
7567-003-022
7567-003-026
7567-003-028
7567-002-037
7567-002-030
7567-006-025
7567-002-034
7567-003-013
7567-003-017
7567-003-019
7567-003-023
7567-003-027
7567-003-036
7567-005-023
7567-006-003
7567-006-011
7567-006-015
7567-006-018
7567-006-024
7567-006-029
7567-012-021
7567-012-026
7567-012-038
7567-012-039
7567-016-013
7567-016-014
7567-017-010
7567-017-013
7567-017-019
7567-017-021
7567-017-027
7567-003-031
7567-003-035
7567-005-016
7567-005-019
7567-005-020
7567-005-022
7567-005-024
7567-005-027
7567-005-029
7567-005-033
7567-006-014
7567-006-023
7567-002-036
7567-003-009
7567-003-018
7567-003-021
7567-003-025
7567-003-034
7567-003-039
7567-005-017
7567-005-018
7567-005-021
7567-005-025
7567-005-028
7567-005-030
7567-005-032
7567-005-034
7567-005-039
7567-005-040
7567-006-001
7567-006-008
7567-006-013
7567-006-020
7567-006-026
7567-012-023
7567-012-029
7567-012-031 7567-012-036
7567-015-039
7567-016-011
7567-016-016
7567-016-017
7567-017-023
7567-017-030
7567-017-032
7567-012-020
7567-012-025
7567-012-027
7567-012-034
7567-016-015
7567-017-022
7567-017-029
7567-002-031
7567-002-035
7567-003-014
7567-003-015
7567-003-029
7567-003-037
7567-003-040
7567-003-041
7567-003-042
7567-005-031
7567-005-037
7567-005-038
7567-005-041
7567-006-012
7567-006-016
7567-006-021
7567-006-028
7567-012-024
7567-012-028
7567-012-030 7567-012-032
7567-012-035
7567-012-037
7567-016-010
7567-017-011
7567-017-017
7569-010-006
7569-010-007
7569-010-011
7569-010-015
7569-012-020
7569-012-027
7569-013-001
7569-013-016
7569-013-017
7569-013-018
7569-014-004
7569-014-005
7569-014-006
7569-015-004
7569-015-006
7567-003-044
7567-003-045
7567-004-014
7567-004-019
7567-004-024
7567-004-029 7567-004-030
7567-010-019
7567-010-020
7567-010-025
7567-014-005
7567-014-011
7567-010-015
7569-013-010
7569-010-012
7569-010-016
7569-010-017
7569-012-007
7569-012-016
7569-012-017
7569-012-018
7569-013-006 7569-013-007
7569-013-013
7569-013-020
7569-014-002
7569-015-002
7569-015-008
7569-008-007
7569-012-004
7569-012-026
7569-013-011
7569-013-014 7569-013-015
7569-014-001
7569-014-013
7569-016-001
7567-003-043
7567-003-049
7567-003-051
7567-004-007
7567-004-013
7567-004-017
7567-004-023
7567-004-027
7567-010-014
7567-010-018
7569-001-020
7567-003-048
7567-004-008
7567-004-011
7567-004-015
7567-010-017
7567-010-036
7567-011-024
7567-010-029
7567-010-033
7567-010-043
7567-011-014
7567-011-027
7567-012-019
7567-004-034
7567-004-035
7567-005-012
7567-005-014
7567-012-040
7567-012-041
7567-013-005
7567-014-006
7567-014-007
7567-014-010
7567-014-012
7567-014-026
7567-015-001
7567-015-005
7567-015-013
7567-015-019
7569-010-004
7569-011-003
7569-011-015
7569-011-016
7569-011-023
7569-012-025
7569-013-003
7569-014-007
7569-015-003
7567-004-012
7567-004-018
7567-004-026
7567-004-028
7567-010-024
7567-010-028 7567-010-034
7567-011-015
7567-011-016
7567-011-017
7567-011-023
7567-004-039
7567-005-010
7567-005-011
7567-013-006
7567-013-007
7567-014-002
7567-014-003
7567-014-008
7567-014-009
7569-009-009
7567-010-026
7567-010-027
7567-010-030
7567-010-032
7567-010-035
7567-010-037
7567-010-042
7567-011-019
7567-004-031
7567-004-032
7567-005-013
7567-013-010
7567-013-012
7567-013-013
7567-014-017
7567-014-021
7567-014-027
7567-015-004
7567-015-012
7567-015-017
7567-015-020
7567-015-036
7567-004-036
7567-004-040
7567-005-015
7567-013-008
7567-013-009 7567-013-011
7567-014-024
7567-015-008
7567-015-011
7567-015-016
7567-015-026
7567-015-027
7569-017-003
7569-017-008
7569-018-003
7569-021-007
7569-021-011
7569-021-018
7569-001-008
7569-001-015
7569-008-002
7569-008-004
7569-009-001
7569-009-007
7569-009-008
7569-017-002
7569-017-007
7569-018-001
7569-018-007
7569-020-004
7569-020-005
7569-021-004
7569-022-004
7569-001-016
7569-001-017
7569-008-006
7569-009-002
7567-014-018
7567-014-023
7567-015-002
7567-015-007
7567-015-014
7567-015-024
7569-017-001
7569-020-001
7569-021-010
7569-001-006
7569-001-007
7569-001-009
7569-007-015
7569-007-016
7569-008-003
7569-008-009
7569-009-011
7569-016-004
7569-023-012
7569-023-016
7569-023-026
7569-017-004
7569-017-005
7569-017-006
7569-018-004
7569-018-005
7569-018-006
7569-019-001
7569-019-002
7569-019-006
7569-020-003
7569-020-009
7569-021-008
7569-001-005
7569-001-018
7569-007-013
7569-008-008
7569-009-004
7569-009-006
7569-009-010
7569-022-005
7569-023-006
7569-023-013
7569-023-015
7569-023-023
7569-023-024
7569-023-025
7569-023-011
7569-023-017
7569-023-027
7570-025-022
7570-024-011
7570-025-018
7570-025-020
7570-025-029
7570-025-030
7570-025-032
7569-023-033
7569-023-034
7570-024-015
7570-024-016
7570-024-017
7570-025-025
7570-025-027
7570-025-028
7569-023-031
7569-015-900
7570-025-023
7569-024-013
7569-024-016
7570-024-014
7570-025-019
7570-025-021
7570-025-024
7570-025-026
7569-024-009
7569-024-012 7569-024-017
7569-024-019 7569-024-021
7569-025-002
7569-025-015
7569-026-004
7569-026-006
7569-026-010
7569-026-017
7569-026-002
7569-026-009
7569-026-013
7569-026-015
7569-025-010
7569-026-003
7569-026-005
7569-024-020
7569-025-003
7569-026-001
7569-026-007
7569-026-014
7570-024-900
7574-020-012
7574-020-008
7567-018-010
7569-026-900
7569-019-011
7567-010-046
7569-022-006
7567-011-022
7569-010-005
7567-010-045
7569-004-011
7567-002-010
7569-026-016
7569-023-014
7569-023-028
7569-025-014
7567-007-003
7567-006-027
7567-010-031
7569-011-006
7567-001-008
7569-001-024
7567-009-034
7567-003-046
7569-008-005
7567-015-003
7569-016-003
7567-007-026
7567-014-019
7567-015-018
7569-016-002
7567-014-025
7569-015-005
7567-007-005
7567-004-010
7567-003-038
7567-005-035
7569-024-014
7569-001-014
7569-011-022
7567-006-022
7569-012-012
7567-017-043
7567-011-018
7567-014-013
7569-007-011
7569-007-014
7567-015-015
7569-011-011
7567-014-028
7569-001-027
7567-011-021
7567-015-035
7567-017-028
7567-002-012
7567-006-017
7569-020-011
7567-009-020
7567-001-011
7567-010-022
7567-017-012
7567-003-032
7569-019-010
7567-004-025
7567-007-023
7567-010-016
7567-001-018
7569-010-010
7567-015-006
7567-010-023
7567-018-007
7569-014-003
7569-018-008
7569-021-019
7567-003-047
7567-012-022
7569-026-008
7570-025-031
7569-024-003
7569-001-021
7569-016-008
7567-017-031
7569-024-029
7569-020-010
7569-021-009
7567-008-020
7569-012-022
7569-026-011
7567-008-010
7569-012-024
7569-025-001
7569-024-028
7567-014-004
7567-015-034
7567-014-031
7569-004-027
7569-009-005
7567-014-022
7569-001-031
7569-012-015
7569-014-014
7569-014-015
7567-012-033
7567-006-019
7569-005-005
7567-017-016
7567-003-024
7567-009-036
7567-016-012
7567-007-009
7567-003-010
7567-004-020
7569-013-019
7567-004-038
7569-001-004
7569-007-012
7569-022-900
7567-015-040
Rolling
Hills
Estates
Rolling
Hills
Estates
Rolling Hills
Rancho
Palos
Verdes
Rancho
Palos
Verdes
Delacroix Rd
Rolling
Hills Rd
Peppertree Rd
Forrestal Dr
Middleridge Rd
Lariat Ln
Crest Rd E
Middlecrest Rd
Greve Dr
Avenue De Magnolia
Diamondhead Ln
Southfield Dr
Blackhorse Rd
Silver Spur Rd
Main Sail Dr
Crest Rd
Crownview Dr
Bronco Dr
Saddleback Rd
Via El Miro
Knoll View Dr
Via El Miro Pl
Robinview
Ln
Upper Blackwater Canyon Rd
Rousseau Ln
Crest Rd W
Palos Verdes Dr E
Bolan Ln
Roan Rd
Pony Ln
Storm
Hill Ln
Beechgate Dr
Ore
Lower Blackwater Canyon Rd
Paseo De Pino
Cartesian Cir
Roseapple Rd
Wrangler Rd
Wideloop Rd
Acacia Ln
Spur Ln
Falcon Rock Pl
Crestr di ge Rd
Mustang
Rd
Abrazo Dr
Palomino Ln
Palos Verdes Dr N
Highpoint Rd
W Academy
Dr
Ringbit Rd W
Cherry
Hill Ln
Ranchero Rd
Trav si Ln
Meadowlark Ln
Roundup Rd
Shady Vista Rd
Lone Valley Dr
Hackamore Rd
Tangerine Rd
Flying Mane Rd
Avenida
De Azalea
El Concho Ln
Eastfield Dr
Dapplegray Ln
Oceanaire Dr
Reata Ln
Wagon Ln
Hummingbird Ln
Pascal Pl
Eucalyptus Ln
Chesterfield Rd
Acacia Rd
Cayuse
Ln
Starline Dr
Pinto Ln
Crestwind Dr
Grandpoint Ln
Marion Dr
Portuguese
Bend
Rd
Newridge Dr
Sweetbay Rd
Parkhurst Dr
Longhill Dr
Club View
Ln
Tallyhand Rd
Maverick Ln
Deerhill Dr
Dobbin Ln
Avenida De Camelia
Larchbluff Dr
Eastvale Rd
Elkridge Dr
Sagebrush Ln
Narcissa Dr
Ganado Dr
Rockinghorse Rd
Pinto Rd
Hitching Post Dr
Pheasant Ln
Valley View Rd
Sunnyfield Ln
Packsaddle Rd E
Private Drwy
Deep Valley Dr
Buckboard
Ln
Flying Mane Ln
Coveview Dr
Canyon View Ln
Crest Rd
Lariat Ln
Limetree Ln
Hillside Ln
Quail Ridge
Rd S
Packsaddle Rd W
Running Brand Rd
Ringbit Rd
E
Delos Dr
Amber Sky Dr
Open Brand Rd
Chestnut Ln
Chaparral Ln
Headland Dr
Sunnyridge Rd
Bowie Rd
Avenida De Rosa
Surrey Ln
Golden Arrow Dr
Elmbridge Dr
Portuguese Bend Rd
Browndeer Ln
Paseo De Castana
Stallion Rd
Williamsburg
Ln
Martingale Dr
Georgeff Rd
Morgan Ln
Crenshaw
Blvd
Middleridge Ln N
Caballeros Rd
Possum
Ridge Rd
Westva el Rd
Roadrunner Rd
Chuckwagon Rd
Quail Ridge
Rd
N
Johns Canyon Rd
Rainbow
Ridge
Rd
Strawberry Ln
Appa ol osa Ln
Palo Verdes Dr N
Poppy
Trl
Cinchring Rd
Outrider Rd
Buckskin Ln
Pinetree Ln
Middleridge Ln S
Buggy Whip
Dr
Burma Rd
Crenshaw Blvd
City of Rolling Hills Parcel Map
Roads
Parcel Boundaries
City Boundaries
Ü
0 0.2 0.4
Miles
Map created by Christine Lam ([email protected])
County of Los Angeles eGIS Group 7/24/2020

Page 140 of 297 ends

ANNUAL SANITATION (GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION) REPORT Sanitation Service
The City of Rolling Hills proposes to collect funds to cover the expenses for the sanitation services provided to each property owner within the City. The following is a summary of the services and activities associated with the charges:
• To protect public health and safety, Contactor shall provide and maintain all labor, equipment, material, supplies, supervision and all other items necessary for the Collection of all Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, Green Waste, Bulky Items, and Brush generated or accumulated within the City from Residential Premises and City Facilities. The services provided by the Contractor under this Agreement shall be performed in a thorough and professional manner so that all Customers are provided at all times with reliable, courteous and high-quality Solid Waste Management Services.
• Contractor shall collect all properly placed Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials and Organic Waste from the designated collection location of every residential premises in the City twice each week.
• Each year on two consecutive Saturdays in April or May, and again on a Saturday in September or October, both as determined by the City, Contractor shall collect an unlimited amount of Bulky Items from the designated collection location. • In addition to the semi-annual Bulky Item Collection events, Contractor shall provide Customers with on-call Collection for Bulky Items upon request. Contractor shall collect one (1) Bulky Item per calendar year from each Residential Premises at no charge on an on-call basis.
• Contractor will provide additional services as outlined in the Amended and Restated Agreement for Residential Solid Waste Management Services.

The frequency, extent, and/or level of the services identified herein may be modified based on available funding and priorities as determined by the City.

Sanitation Service Charge Calculation
For Fiscal Year 2015-2016, the sanitation charge in the amount of $1,100 per parcel was established. The sanitation charge remained unchanged through fiscal year 2023.

Page 141 of 297 ends

In Fiscal Year 2023-2024, the cost of providing sanitation services increased to $1,432.11 per parcel. The increase from the $1,100 per parcel over the last five fiscal years to $1,432.11 per parcel is based on the direct costs incurred by the City based on the amounts paid to Republic Services for refuse services, which include adjustments for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and landfill costs. The Franchise Agreement requires that Republic Services annually provide evidence of the CPI adjustment to the City Manager for review and approval.

For fiscal year 2025-26, the annual sanitation charge will increase to $1,503.72 per parcel based on the direct cost of providing the service, which includes a 5% increase from fiscal year 2024-25 pursuant to the City’s existing solid waste franchise agreement (“Franchise Agreement”) with Republic Services, which provides for inflationary increases in Solid Waste Service rates every July 1 due to the annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Water and Sewer and Trash Collection Services, U.S. City Average, not seasonally adjusted, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (“CPI”).

Proposition 218 Considerations:

Proposition 218, which the voters of the State of California passed on November 5, 1996, contains requirements for the imposition of a fee or charge for property related services.

Requirements for fees and charges are contained in Section 6 of Article XIII D.

Paragraph (b) describes the requirements for new, existing, or increased fees and charges as follows:
(1) Revenues shall not exceed the funds required to provide the services. (2) Revenues shall not be used for any other purpose.
(3) The amount of the fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel.
(4) No fee or charge may be imposed unless the service is actually used by or immediately available to the owner of the property in question.
(5) No fee or charge shall be imposed for general governmental services, i.e. police, ambulance, library, where the service is available to the public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to the property owners.

This report and recommended charges comply with all five of these requirements:

1. Revenues generated by this charge will not exceed funds required to provide sanitation services and shall not be used for any other purpose, besides what has been described herein.

2. The sanitation charge does not exceed the proportional cost of providing service to the parcels in the City and the charge is for actual use by or immediately available to the owner of the property in question.

Page 142 of 297 ends

Boundary Diagram
The enclosed diagram shows the exterior boundaries of the territory within the City of Rolling Hills subject to the annual sanitation charges, which has the same boundaries of the City of Rolling Hills itself. Parcel identification, the lines and dimensions of each lot, and parcel and subdivision of land within proposed sanitation services boundary described herein are identified and correspond to the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall include all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein.

Reference is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor’s map for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the City of Rolling Hills subject to the proposed annual sanitation service charge to be levied on behalf of the City.

List of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers to be levied with the proposed charge amounts:

Parcel Number Land Use Description Charge
See Attached Residential See Attached

Page 143 of 297 ends

1 7567001004 1503.72 238.92
7567001006 1503.72
7567001007 1503.72
7567001008 1503.72
7567001010 1503.72
7567001011 1503.72
7567001013 1503.72
7567001014 1503.72
7567001016 1503.72
7567001017 1503.72
7567001018 1503.72
7567002004 1503.72
7567002005 1503.72
7567002006 1503.72
7567002007 1503.72
7567002008 1503.72
7567002009 1503.72
7567002010 1503.72
7567002011 1503.72
7567002012 1503.72
7567002013 1503.72
7567002014 1503.72
7567002015 1503.72
7567002016 1503.72
7567002017 1503.72
7567002018 1503.72
7567002019 1503.72
7567002020 1503.72
7567002021 1503.72
7567002022 1503.72
7567002023 1503.72
7567002024 1503.72
7567002025 1503.72
7567002026 1503.72
7567002027 1503.72
7567002028 1503.72
7567002029 1503.72
7567002030 1503.72
7567002031 1503.72
7567002034 1503.72
7567002035 1503.72
7567002036 1503.72
7567002037 1503.72
7567003008 1503.72
7567003009 1503.72
7567003010 1503.72
7567003011 1503.72
7567003012 1503.72
7567003013 1503.72
7567003014 1503.72
7567003015 1503.72
7567003016 1503.72
7567003017 1503.72
7567003018 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 144 of 297
2 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 145 of 297
3 7567003019 1503.72
7567003020 1503.72
7567003021 1503.72
7567003022 1503.72
7567003023 1503.72
7567003024 1503.72
7567003025 1503.72
7567003026 1503.72
7567003027 1503.72
7567003028 1503.72
7567003029 1503.72
7567003030 1503.72
7567003031 1503.72
7567003032 1503.72
7567003033 1503.72
7567003034 1503.72
7567003035 1503.72
7567003036 1503.72
7567003037 1503.72
7567003038 1503.72
7567003039 1503.72
7567003040 1503.72
7567003041 1503.72
7567003042 1503.72
7567003043 1503.72
7567003044 1503.72
7567003045 1503.72
7567003046 1503.72
7567003047 1503.72
7567003048 1503.72
7567003049 1503.72
7567003050 1503.72
7567003051 1503.72
7567003052 1503.72
7567004007 1503.72
7567004008 1503.72
7567004009 1503.72
7567004010 1503.72
7567004011 1503.72
7567004012 1503.72
7567004013 1503.72
7567004014 1503.72
7567004015 1503.72
7567004016 1503.72
7567004017 1503.72
7567004018 1503.72
7567004019 1503.72
7567004020 1503.72
7567004023 1503.72
7567004024 1503.72
7567004025 1503.72
7567004026 1503.72
7567004027 1503.72
7567004028 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 146 of 297
4 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 147 of 297
5 7567004029 1503.72
7567004030 1503.72
7567004031 1503.72
7567004032 1503.72
7567004033 1503.72
7567004034 1503.72
7567004035 1503.72
7567004036 1503.72
7567004037 1503.72
7567004038 1503.72
7567004039 1503.72
7567004040 1503.72
7567004041 1503.72
7567005010 1503.72
7567005011 1503.72
7567005012 1503.72
7567005013 1503.72
7567005014 1503.72
7567005015 1503.72
7567005016 1503.72
7567005017 1503.72
7567005018 1503.72
7567005019 1503.72
7567005020 1503.72
7567005021 1503.72
7567005022 1503.72
7567005023 1503.72
7567005024 1503.72
7567005025 1503.72
7567005027 1503.72
7567005028 1503.72
7567005029 1503.72
7567005030 1503.72
7567005031 1503.72
7567005032 1503.72
7567005033 1503.72
7567005034 1503.72
7567005035 1503.72
7567005036 1503.72
7567005037 1503.72
7567005038 1503.72
7567005039 1503.72
7567005040 1503.72
7567005041 1503.72
7567006002 1503.72
7567006003 1503.72
7567006008 1503.72
7567006011 1503.72
7567006012 1503.72
7567006013 1503.72
7567006015 1503.72
7567006016 1503.72
7567006017 1503.72
7567006018 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 148 of 297
6 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 149 of 297
7 7567006019 1503.72
7567006020 1503.72
7567006021 1503.72
7567006022 1503.72
7567006023 1503.72
7567006024 1503.72
7567006026 1503.72
7567006027 1503.72
7567006028 1503.72
7567006029 1503.72
7567006030 1503.72
7567006031 1503.72
7567006032 1503.72
7567006033 1503.72
7567006034 1503.72
7567006035 1503.72
7567006036 1503.72
7567006037 1503.72
7567006038 1503.72
7567007003 1503.72
7567007004 1503.72
7567007005 1503.72
7567007006 1503.72
7567007007 1503.72
7567007008 1503.72
7567007009 1503.72
7567007010 1503.72
7567007011 1503.72
7567007012 1503.72
7567007013 1503.72
7567007014 1503.72
7567007016 1503.72
7567007017 1503.72
7567007018 1503.72
7567007019 1503.72
7567007020 1503.72
7567007021 1503.72
7567007022 1503.72
7567007023 1503.72
7567007024 1503.72
7567007025 1503.72
7567007026 1503.72
7567008007 1503.72
7567008008 1503.72
7567008009 1503.72
7567008010 1503.72
7567008011 1503.72
7567008014 1503.72
7567008015 1503.72
7567008016 1503.72
7567008020 1503.72
7567009005 1503.72
7567009006 1503.72
7567009009 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 150 of 297
8 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 151 of 297
9 7567009010 1503.72
7567009012 1503.72
7567009013 1503.72
7567009014 1503.72
7567009015 1503.72
7567009016 1503.72
7567009017 1503.72
7567009018 1503.72
7567009019 1503.72
7567009020 1503.72
7567009021 1503.72
7567009022 1503.72
7567009023 1503.72
7567009024 1503.72
7567009025 1503.72
7567009026 1503.72
7567009027 1503.72
7567009029 1503.72
7567009030 1503.72
7567009031 1503.72
7567009032 1503.72
7567009033 1503.72
7567009034 1503.72
7567009035 1503.72
7567009036 1503.72
7567009038 1503.72
7567009039 1503.72
7567010009 1503.72
7567010012 1503.72
7567010014 1503.72
7567010016 1503.72
7567010017 1503.72
7567010018 1503.72
7567010019 1503.72
7567010020 1503.72
7567010022 1503.72
7567010023 1503.72
7567010024 1503.72
7567010025 1503.72
7567010026 1503.72
7567010027 1503.72
7567010028 1503.72
7567010029 1503.72
7567010030 1503.72
7567010031 1503.72
7567010032 1503.72
7567010033 1503.72
7567010034 1503.72
7567010035 1503.72
7567010036 1503.72
7567010037 1503.72
7567010042 1503.72
7567010043 1503.72
7567010045 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 152 of 297
10 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 153 of 297
11 7567010046 1503.72
7567011014 1503.72
7567011015 1503.72
7567011016 1503.72
7567011018 1503.72
7567011019 1503.72
7567011021 1503.72
7567011022 1503.72
7567011023 1503.72
7567011024 1503.72
7567011027 1503.72
7567012016 1503.72
7567012021 1503.72
7567012022 1503.72
7567012023 1503.72
7567012024 1503.72
7567012025 1503.72
7567012027 1503.72
7567012028 1503.72
7567012029 1503.72
7567012030 1503.72
7567012031 1503.72
7567012032 1503.72
7567012033 1503.72
7567012034 1503.72
7567012037 1503.72
7567012039 1503.72
7567012040 1503.72
7567012041 1503.72
7567013006 1503.72
7567013008 1503.72
7567013009 1503.72
7567013010 1503.72
7567013011 1503.72
7567013012 1503.72
7567013013 1503.72
7567014002 1503.72
7567014003 1503.72
7567014004 1503.72
7567014006 1503.72
7567014007 1503.72
7567014008 1503.72
7567014009 1503.72
7567014010 1503.72
7567014012 1503.72
7567014018 1503.72
7567014019 1503.72
7567014021 1503.72
7567014022 1503.72
7567014023 1503.72
7567014024 1503.72
7567014025 1503.72
7567014026 1503.72
7567014027 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 154 of 297
12 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 155 of 297
13 7567014028 1503.72
7567014031 1503.72
7567015001 1503.72
7567015002 1503.72
7567015003 1503.72
7567015004 1503.72
7567015005 1503.72
7567015006 1503.72
7567015007 1503.72
7567015008 1503.72
7567015011 1503.72
7567015012 1503.72
7567015013 1503.72
7567015014 1503.72
7567015015 1503.72
7567015016 1503.72
7567015017 1503.72
7567015018 1503.72
7567015019 1503.72
7567015020 1503.72
7567015024 1503.72
7567015026 1503.72
7567015027 1503.72
7567015034 1503.72
7567015035 1503.72
7567015037 1503.72
7567015039 1503.72
7567016010 1503.72
7567016011 1503.72
7567016012 1503.72
7567016013 1503.72
7567016014 1503.72
7567016015 1503.72
7567016016 1503.72
7567016017 1503.72
7567017010 1503.72
7567017011 1503.72
7567017012 1503.72
7567017013 1503.72
7567017016 1503.72
7567017019 1503.72
7567017020 1503.72
7567017021 1503.72
7567017022 1503.72
7567017023 1503.72
7567017027 1503.72
7567017028 1503.72
7567017029 1503.72
7567017030 1503.72
7567017031 1503.72
7567017032 1503.72
7567017033 1503.72
7567017034 1503.72
7567017036 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 156 of 297
14 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 157 of 297
15 7567017037 1503.72
7567017038 1503.72
7567017039 1503.72
7567017040 1503.72
7567017041 1503.72
7567017042 1503.72
7567017043 1503.72
7567017044 1503.72
7567017046 1503.72
7567017047 1503.72
7567017048 1503.72
7567017051 1503.72
7567017052 1503.72
7567018001 1503.72
7567018002 1503.72
7567018003 1503.72
7567018004 1503.72
7567018005 1503.72
7567018006 1503.72
7567018007 1503.72
7567018008 1503.72
7567018009 1503.72
7567018010 1503.72
7567018011 1503.72
7567018012 1503.72
7567018013 1503.72
7567018014 1503.72
7567018015 1503.72
7567018016 1503.72
7567018017 1503.72
7567018018 1503.72
7567018019 1503.72
7567018020 1503.72
7567018021 1503.72
7567018022 1503.72
7567018023 1503.72
7567018024 1503.72
7567018025 1503.72
7567018028 1503.72
7567018029 1503.72
7567018030 1503.72
7567018031 1503.72
7567018032 1503.72
7567018033 1503.72
7567018034 1503.72
7567018036 1503.72
7567018037 1503.72
7569001004 1503.72
7569001005 1503.72
7569001006 1503.72
7569001007 1503.72
7569001008 1503.72
7569001009 1503.72
7569001014 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 158 of 297
16 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 159 of 297
17 7569001015 1503.72
7569001016 1503.72
7569001017 1503.72
7569001018 1503.72
7569001021 1503.72
7569001023 1503.72
7569001024 1503.72
7569001025 1503.72
7569001026 1503.72
7569001027 1503.72
7569001028 1503.72
7569001029 1503.72
7569001030 1503.72
7569001031 1503.72
7569001032 1503.72
7569001033 1503.72
7569001034 1503.72
7569001035 1503.72
7569002002 1503.72
7569002005 1503.72
7569002006 1503.72
7569002007 1503.72
7569002008 1503.72
7569002010 1503.72
7569002011 1503.72
7569002012 1503.72
7569002013 1503.72
7569002014 1503.72
7569002015 1503.72
7569002016 1503.72
7569002017 1503.72
7569002018 1503.72
7569003001 1503.72
7569003002 1503.72
7569003003 1503.72
7569003006 1503.72
7569003007 1503.72
7569003010 1503.72
7569003011 1503.72
7569003013 1503.72
7569004002 1503.72
7569004004 1503.72
7569004005 1503.72
7569004006 1503.72
7569004011 1503.72
7569004012 1503.72
7569004013 1503.72
7569004015 1503.72
7569004017 1503.72
7569004018 1503.72
7569004020 1503.72
7569004021 1503.72
7569004024 1503.72
7569004025 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 160 of 297
18 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 161 of 297
19 7569004027 1503.72
7569005001 1503.72
7569005002 1503.72
7569005003 1503.72
7569005004 1503.72
7569005005 1503.72
7569005006 1503.72
7569005007 1503.72
7569005010 1503.72
7569005013 1503.72
7569005014 1503.72
7569005015 1503.72
7569005016 1503.72
7569006001 1503.72
7569006006 1503.72
7569006007 1503.72
7569007002 1503.72
7569007003 1503.72
7569007008 1503.72
7569007009 1503.72
7569007010 1503.72
7569007011 1503.72
7569007012 1503.72
7569007013 1503.72
7569007014 1503.72
7569007015 1503.72
7569007016 1503.72
7569008002 1503.72
7569008003 1503.72
7569008004 1503.72
7569008005 1503.72
7569008006 1503.72
7569008008 1503.72
7569008009 1503.72
7569009001 1503.72
7569009002 1503.72
7569009004 1503.72
7569009005 1503.72
7569009006 1503.72
7569009007 1503.72
7569009008 1503.72
7569009010 1503.72
7569009011 1503.72
7569010004 1503.72
7569010005 1503.72
7569010006 1503.72
7569010007 1503.72
7569010010 1503.72
7569010011 1503.72
7569010012 1503.72
7569010015 1503.72
7569010016 1503.72
7569010017 1503.72
7569011006 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 162 of 297
20 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 163 of 297
21 7569011011 1503.72
7569011012 1503.72
7569011015 1503.72
7569011016 1503.72
7569011022 1503.72
7569011023 1503.72
7569012004 1503.72
7569012007 1503.72
7569012008 1503.72
7569012012 1503.72
7569012015 1503.72
7569012016 1503.72
7569012017 1503.72
7569012018 1503.72
7569012019 1503.72
7569012020 1503.72
7569012024 1503.72
7569012026 1503.72
7569012027 1503.72
7569013001 1503.72
7569013003 1503.72
7569013006 1503.72
7569013007 1503.72
7569013010 1503.72
7569013011 1503.72
7569013012 1503.72
7569013013 1503.72
7569013014 1503.72
7569013015 1503.72
7569013016 1503.72
7569013017 1503.72
7569013018 1503.72
7569013019 1503.72
7569014001 1503.72
7569014002 1503.72
7569014003 1503.72
7569014004 1503.72
7569014005 1503.72
7569014006 1503.72
7569014007 1503.72
7569014013 1503.72
7569014014 1503.72
7569014015 1503.72
7569015002 1503.72
7569015003 1503.72
7569015004 1503.72
7569015005 1503.72
7569015006 1503.72
7569015007 1503.72
7569015008 1503.72
7569016001 1503.72
7569016002 1503.72
7569016003 1503.72
7569016004 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 164 of 297
22 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 165 of 297
23 7569016008 1503.72
7569017001 1503.72
7569017002 1503.72
7569017003 1503.72
7569017004 1503.72
7569017005 1503.72
7569017006 1503.72
7569017007 1503.72
7569017008 1503.72
7569018001 1503.72
7569018002 1503.72
7569018003 1503.72
7569018004 1503.72
7569018005 1503.72
7569018006 1503.72
7569018007 1503.72
7569018008 1503.72
7569019001 1503.72
7569019002 1503.72
7569019006 1503.72
7569019010 1503.72
7569019011 1503.72
7569020001 1503.72
7569020003 1503.72
7569020005 1503.72
7569020009 1503.72
7569020010 1503.72
7569020011 1503.72
7569021004 1503.72
7569021005 1503.72
7569021007 1503.72
7569021008 1503.72
7569021009 1503.72
7569021010 1503.72
7569021011 1503.72
7569021018 1503.72
7569021019 1503.72
7569022004 1503.72
7569022005 1503.72
7569023006 1503.72
7569023011 1503.72
7569023012 1503.72
7569023013 1503.72
7569023014 1503.72
7569023015 1503.72
7569023016 1503.72
7569023017 1503.72
7569023023 1503.72
7569023024 1503.72
7569023025 1503.72
7569023026 1503.72
7569023027 1503.72
7569023028 1503.72
7569023031 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 166 of 297
24 DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 167 of 297
25 7569023033 1503.72
7569024003 1503.72
7569024009 1503.72
7569024012 1503.72
7569024013 1503.72
7569024014 1503.72
7569024015 1503.72
7569024016 1503.72
7569024017 1503.72
7569024019 1503.72
7569024020 1503.72
7569024021 1503.72
7569024028 1503.72
7569024029 1503.72
7569025001 1503.72
7569025002 1503.72
7569025003 1503.72
7569025010 1503.72
7569025014 1503.72
7569025015 1503.72
7569026001 1503.72
7569026002 1503.72
7569026003 1503.72
7569026004 1503.72
7569026005 1503.72
7569026006 1503.72
7569026007 1503.72
7569026008 1503.72
7569026009 1503.72
7569026010 1503.72
7569026011 1503.72
7569026012 1503.72
7569026013 1503.72
7569026014 1503.72
7569026015 1503.72
7569026016 1503.72
7569026017 1503.72
7570024011 1503.72
7570024024 1503.72
7570025018 1503.72
7570025019 1503.72
7570025020 1503.72
7570025021 1503.72
7570025023 1503.72
7570025024 1503.72
7570025025 1503.72
7570025026 1503.72
7570025027 1503.72
7570025028 1503.72
7570025029 1503.72
7570025030 1503.72
7570025031 1503.72
7570025032 1503.72
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 168 of 297
26 1054107.7
DA_2026_23892.xlsx Page 169 of 297

Page 170 of 297 ends

Page 171 of 297 ends

Item: 12.A.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Consider and approve Republic Services field operation expansion of Mother Truck staging site locations
Background:

While staff handle calls or emails daily and coordinate with Republic Services for response and correction, service issues had grown over a five-month period in 2023. As a result, staff held a virtual meeting on Friday, August 25, 2023, with the Operations Supervisor and the Operations Manager to discuss ongoing complaints and operational issues from residents. At the August 28, 2023, City Council meeting, then-Mayor Pro Tem Mirsch requested an agenda item to discuss the numerous resident complaints.

On September 11, 2023, staff presented a similar report to the City Council. A room full of residents showed up, with a handful speaking on behalf of the greater number, outlining ongoing and repetitive issues that had been reported to staff or Councilmembers and, in turn, forwarded to Republic staff.

One resident opined that the current routes and staging locations appeared extremely inefficient and offered to have their family business route logistics consultant meet with Republic Services to help reexamine their existing routes and staging procedures. The City Council decided to have the Solid Waste and Recycling Committee continue a more robust discussion of these issues with Republic Services.

On October 3, 2023, the Solid Waste and Recycling Committee met to discuss this same topic. Then Mayor Wilson was absent; however, Mayor Pro Tem Mirsch led a discussion with Republic Services representatives and City Staff regarding concerns and complaints, as well as the desire to expand the Mother Truck sites throughout the city and improve the logistical aspects of trash collection. No action was taken.

From October 2023 to January 2024, City staff worked with the Operations Supervisor(s) and started holding monthly meetings to address ongoing concerns. Staff requested the utilization of existing approved Mother Truck staging locations and/or finding new locations that would be acceptable to Republic Services. Staff requested that Republic Services provide feedback on locations and shift existing sites to test staging sites that have already been approved. Staff also included input from Arty Beckler and Kristen Raig of the Rolling Hills Community Association.

Page 172 of 297 ends

With this strategy in mind, the staff's intent was to ultimately bring new locations to the Traffic Engineer, the Traffic Commission, and the City Council for approval. Staff's goal was to have 8-10 (or more) locations that could be used for Mother Truck staging, thereby minimizing the amount of time a truck spends at any given location during the week. Assuming an eight-location strategy, Republic Services would stage the Mother Truck at one location during the morning and another during the afternoon. Each location would only be used for a maximum of 4 hours, once a week.

On May 22, 2025, this report was presented to the Traffic Commission and approved as presented for recommendation to the City Council.

Discussion:

The Rolling Hills City Council approved 14 Mother Truck staging locations on February 22, 2010, with waste hauler Allied Waste. In 2018, the new waste hauler, Republic Services, and staff communicated about staging locations, and the City Manager noted that only three locations were primarily utilized throughout the week: Georgeff Road, Southfield Drive/Packsaddle Road East, and Portuguese Bend Road (Attachments A and B).

The 2010 approved thirteen staging locations are as follows by area:

Area 1 Area 2 Area 3
• Saddleback Rd. /
Roadrunner Rd.
• Wagon Lane
• Georgeff Rd.
• Saddleback Rd.
(Between 36 and 42)
• Caballeros Rd./Crest
Rd.E
• Crest Road E /
Eastfield Dr.
• Chuckwagon Rd./
Eastfield Dr.
• Outrider Rd. / Eastfield
Dr.
• Southfield Dr./
Packsaddle Dr. E
• Southfield Dr. /
Packsaddle Dr. E
• Portuguese Bend Rd. S /
Ranchero Rd.
• Quailridge Rd. N
• Buggy Whip Dr.
• Johns Canyon Rd.

Considering resident concerns, ongoing operational issues, and the length of time since the previous evaluation of staging sites, City staff, in collaboration with Republic Services' Operations Supervisor, reviewed existing approved staging locations and potential new locations over the past 15 months, in an attempt to minimize impacts on residents in any one area. Testing was done at a variety of sites to determine whether the Mother Trucks and scooters could properly maneuver safely while attempting to avoid causing issues with traveling vehicles. Staff even worked with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District to use the Rancho Del Mar school site as a potential staging location.

Unfortunately, while this was tested, it ultimately did not work for daily recovery.

In both October 2023 and January 2024, the Solid Waste and Recycling Committee met and discussed Mother Truck staging locations. In February 2024, then-Mayor Mirsch conducted "Kitchen Cabinet" meetings with some local residents to discuss trash service concerns, issues, and potential solutions.

On March 12, 2024, staff, along with the RHCA, Republic Services, and then-Mayor Mirsch, visited seven potential new sites for initial evaluation to determine whether the sites might be optimal for Republic Services to test. These included Portuguese Bend Road / Lower Blackwater, Middleridge

Page 173 of 297 ends

South (end of cul-de-sac), Poppy Trail (at Saddleback/Portuguese Bend Road), Crest Road East (near Cal Water site), Bowie Road (between 9 and 12), 52 Portuguese Bend Road (in the west easement), and Roadrunner Road. Six of the sites were found eligible for additional testing by Republic Services. Over the subsequent months of testing, the Republic Services team identified further issues with some sites, which were not recommended for continued use.

As it relates to the additional new locations:

The RHCA recommended that the previously approved Saddleback location(s) not be reconsidered for potential future staging. Concerns expressed included traffic safety concerns with vehicular traffic, winding road on an incline, and less maneuverability for both the Mother Truck and scooters. Moving approximately 200 feet to Roadrunner Road was determined to be safer and provided plenty of room for staging, either within or adjacent to the easement.

Poppy Trail (at Saddleback Road) has a large easement that allows for safe staging without impeding traffic and is centrally located.

The easement across from 52 Portuguese Bend Road South was recommended by then-Mayor Mirsch when the Portuguese Bend Road S. / Ranchero Road location became unavailable. It has a wide easement that allows for safe staging without impeding traffic.

Proposed New Locations, Days, and Time Changes
Ultimately, after utilizing all locations (old and potential new sites), Republic Services operations have determined that the following locations, days, and times consistently work well for weekly servicing, with a 4-hour window for any one location, once a week. Traffic Engineer, Vanessa Munoz, has evaluated the new locations. Her report can be found as Attachment C. New locations are highlighted.

Service Day Time Location
Mixed Service Waste Monday (AM) 7am-11am Roadrunner Rd. (approx. 200 ft. north of Saddleback
Road)
Green Waste Monday (PM) 12pm-4pm Poppy Trail (at
Saddleback/PBR)
Mixed Service Waste Tuesday (AM) 7am-11am 52 Portuguese Bend Rd. S

Mixed Service Waste Tuesday (AM) 11am-1pm Outrider Rd. / Eastfield Dr.

Green Waste Tuesday (PM) 1pm-4pm Crest Rd. E / Eastfield Dr.

Mixed Service Waste /
Green Waste
Wednesday Open for Recovery
Only
Open
Mixed Service Waste Thursday (AM) 7am-11am Georgeff Rd.

Green Waste Thursday (PM) 12pm-4pm Caballeros / Crest Rd. E Mixed Service Waste Friday (AM) 7am-10am Buggy Whip Dr. / Crest Rd.

W
Green Waste Friday (PM) 10am-4:30pm Southfield Dr. / Packsaddle Rd. E

Page 174 of 297 ends

Mixed Service Waste /
Green Waste
Saturday Open for Recovery
Only
Open

Resident Complaint
In April 2025, staff received one complaint from a resident on Roadrunner Road regarding the Roadrunner location (Attachment D). Staff spoke with the resident numerous times and informed them of both the Traffic Commission meeting and potential City Council meeting item for consideration. Most recently, the resident met with the City Manager on July 21, 2025, to discuss the Roadrunner location. During this meeting, the resident also presented a petition for City Council’s consideration signed by adjacent neighbors (Attachment E).

As a result of the complaint, staff again requested additional input from the RHCA, the Traffic Engineer, and the Republic Services Operations Supervisor to explain their perspectives on the use of Saddleback versus the proposed Roadrunner location. In light of the recent comments regarding air pollution, staff also asked Republic Services for additional information:

1. The RHCA's initial findings are above in the report, but the follow-up response was:
"...reason for not using Saddleback is purely a safety issue. Too many blind curves, nowhere for the scooters to turn around safely, and nowhere for all the trucks to stage for the mother truck."

2. The Traffic Engineer's professional opinion: "The newly proposed location on Roadrunner Road offers increased safety for the residents of Rolling Hills by relocating the staging area from Saddleback Road—a heavily traveled route—to the less frequented Roadrunner Road.

This change enhances the efficiency of service delivery while significantly reducing impacts on vehicular, pedestrian, and equestrian traffic and improving safety."

3. The Republic Services Operations Supervisor perspective: Approximately eighteen months ago, I met with members of the City Council of Rolling Hills to conduct an on-site evaluation of potential staging locations. After thoroughly reviewing multiple options, the site on Roadrunner Road was determined to be the most appropriate and practical location based on three primary criteria. Safety for both residents and operational staff, Proximity and accessibility to customer routes and Year-round feasibility, especially during adverse seasonal conditions.

Other potential staging areas proved to be unsuitable, particularly during winter due to soft terrain, standing water, and poor structural support for vehicle parking.

Since March of this year, I have engaged in several conversations with the residents located near the site, regarding their concerns about noise and the presence of the truck near their property. I have made every effort to understand and address their concerns in good faith. I personally visited the staging site on April 15, April 17, and April 22 per the customer’s request and once to twice a week to verify the staging locations. I spoke with them multiple times regarding Mother Truck Service and haven’t received any other complaints from residents regarding these issues.

I rotated out vehicles to reduce noise levels, I conducted driver site checks and confirmed that the area was clean, orderly, and compliant and I observed that the noise is minimal and occurs only during a narrow operational window between 7:30 AM and 11:00 AM, when a maximum of five smaller scooter trucks arrive to offload materials at staggered times. It is also worth noting that there is ongoing construction activity near the site which contributes to ambient noise

Page 175 of 297 ends

levels, though no complaints have been received regarding that source. My team and I have made every reasonable accommodation to minimize disruption, but we are constrained by the limited number of authorized staging areas.

Based on our operational needs, safety assessments for the residence and the drivers, and site conditions, Roadrunner Road continues to be the most viable option. I respectfully request the Council’s continued support in allowing this location to remain active for staging purposes.

We remain committed to upholding community standards and will continue to monitor the site closely for cleanliness, safety, and minimal impact on nearby residents. Please feel free to contact me directly with any questions or if further clarification.

4. Republic Services' response to the concern regarding Air Pollution: The Mother Trucks are Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles (CNG). Republic Services also conducts Opacity Testing on all Scooter vehicles as required by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Opacity Testing measures the density of exhaust fumes to determine if the engine is working properly and not releasing excessive pollutants.

CNG-powered heavy vehicles offer several benefits, including reduced emissions, lower fuel costs, and potential government incentives, making them a more sustainable and costeffective option compared to traditional diesel vehicles. They also offer comparable performance and potentially longer engine life due to cleaner burning characteristics.

Environmental Benefits include:
o Reduced Emissions: CNG vehicles significantly reduce harmful emissions, especially nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter, which contribute to air pollution and respiratory problems.
o Lower Greenhouse Gas Emissions: CNG combustion produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions than diesel, contributing to a smaller carbon footprint and mitigating climate change.
o Cleaner Burning: CNG burns cleaner than diesel, leading to less soot and other pollutants.
o Reduced Spills: Unlike liquid fuels, natural gas dissipates quickly in case of a leak, reducing the risk of spills and environmental contamination.

CONCLUSION
Staff, along with the Solid Waste & Recycling Ad Hoc Committee, have worked to address resident concerns about Republic Services’ field operations by collaborating with the service provider, engaging the community (including repeated messaging in the regular and special blue newsletters starting January 2024), and exploring opportunities to expand and optimize Mother Truck staging site locations. The proposed strategy aims to increase the number of approved staging sites, thereby improving collection efficiency and, more importantly, minimizing neighborhood impacts to residents.

The testing of locations over the past year has been successful and is working effectively.

Throughout this process, staff remained committed to keeping residents informed and involved, particularly those residing near any proposed new staging locations. Staff recommends approval of the updated staging locations, days, and times as presented.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Page 176 of 297 ends

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - CL_AGN_100222_CC_Item3H_FrontLoaderStaging_Request_Recs

2. Attachment B - PW_REF_181003_RepublicServices_MotherTruck_StagingLocations

3. Attachment C - CL_AGN_250522_TC_Republic_MotherTruckStaging_EngineersReport

4. Attachment D - CL_AGN_250522_TC_Item11A_PublicComment_Tun_Redacted

5. Attachment E - CL_AGN_250721_CC_Tun_Petition_Redacted

Page 177 of 297 ends

City of Rolling Hills INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957

NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
- 1 -
Agenda Item No.: 3-H
Mtg. Date: 02-22-10
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ANTON DAHLERBRUCH, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A TRAFFIC COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION OF STAGING LOCATIONS FOR THE
REFUSE HAULER’S “MOTHER TRUCK”.

DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2010
ATTACHMENTS:
07-07-09 Memo from Traffic Engineer concerning staging locations 03-05-09 Memo from Traffic Engineer concerning staging locations Summary List of Recommended Staging Locations
Notice Data for Addresses Adjacent to Proposed Staging Locations

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Traffic Commission’s recommendation of 14 locations for Allied Waste to stage its “mother truck” (front loader) for the collection and transport of solid waste.

BACKGROUND
The City’s refuse hauler, Allied Waste, operates through “scouts” that collect refuse at each residence and transports it to a “mother truck” at a central location. The “mother truck” moves throughout each day to different locations in the City that are central to the collection efforts in a particular area the “scouts” are working. Allied Waste states that the “scouts,” for optimal operations, should cover an area consisting of 27 to 65 residences. As such, on each day refuse is collected, Allied Waste desires 7 to 8 locations where the “mother truck” can be strategically stationed. The “mother truck” would be (is) in each location for approximately 2 hours.

Page 178 of 297 ends

-2-
Over the years, residents have complained about the staging location of the “mother truck” citing issues of noise, emissions, visual impact, leftover debris and leakage with the vehicles. To address the complaints, Allied Waste has reduced and relocated the “mother truck” staging locations to a point where, according to Allied Waste, operations have been impacted. Allied Waste reports that the reduction of staging locations has caused the “scouts” to cover 86 to 126 residences, drive longer from residences to the “mother truck” and, for the “mother truck” to be stationed in one location for extended periods of time. As such, Allied Waste has requested the formal designation of staging locations.

In response to Allied Waste’s request, the City’s Traffic Engineer and City Manager, on multiple occasions toured the City with Allied Waste representatives to identify locations that served Allied Waste operationally while also addressing the Traffic Engineer’s concerns for traffic safety. Fourteen (14) locations were identified that met both parties’ interests. Thereafter, at its meetings of March 26, July 23 and September 24, 2009, and its meeting of January 28, 2010, the Traffic Commission considered Allied Waste’s request for approval of the 14 locations to stage the “mother truck.” For Traffic Commission meeting on March 26, 2009, notice of the agenda item was mailed to all residents adjacent to proposed staging locations and information about the meeting was included in the City Newsletter. In response, the Traffic Commission received input from residents about the locations at Portuguese Bend Road/Ranchero Road (for visibility); Crest Road East, east of Eastfield Drive (for noise and traffic); and Saddleback Road near Hillside Lane (for impact on horses). As a result, the Allied Waste representative and City Traffic Engineer re-evaluated the three locations for functionality, safety and alternatives.

For the July 23, 2009 Traffic Commission meeting, notice of the agenda item was mailed to the resident from Portuguese Bend Road/Ranchero Road; the residents closest to the proposed staging location at Crest Road East; and the residents from 26 Saddleback Road to Hillside Lane. At the meeting, the Traffic Commission concluded that there was no alternative for the staging locations at Portuguese Bend Road/Ranchero Road and at Crest Road East and both represented the best functional location for Allied Waste, presented no traffic concern to the City Traffic Engineer and was not immediately adjacent to a residential structure (relative to noise). Additionally, it was noted without these staging locations, the impact of “scouts” traveling longer distances and the “mother truck” being stationed in one location longer is greater on the community. In regard to the Crest Road East site, Allied Waste proposed operating on the southside rather than the northside of the roadway. Also, in response to the residents of 76 Eastfield Drive, the Traffic Commission agreed to continue the discussion of this location to September 24.

For the September 24, 2009 Traffic Commission meeting, notice of the agenda item was mailed to 76 Eastfield Drive, and two other residents who had expressed interest on the topic – a resident adjacent to Wagon Lane and a resident on Chuckwagon Road at

Page 179 of 297 ends

-3-
Eastfield Drive. At the meeting, the Traffic Commission received input from the resident adjacent to Wagon Lane (32 Portuguese Bend Road) about the emissions generated from the “mother truck” when stationed on Wagon Lane, expressing concern about its health impacts. In response, Allied Waste reported that their vehicles meet the State’s emissions requirements and, replacement “mother trucks” would soon be employed that will reduce emissions further. Allied Waste and the Traffic Engineer also stated that there was no operational and safe alternative to this staging location.

However, in recognition of the concern, staff was directed to re-consider locations. In regard to the Crest Road East staging location, the residents of 76 Eastfield Drive, who could not attend the meeting, asked that the matter be continued.

For the January 28, 2010 Traffic Commission meeting, notice of the agenda item was mailed to 32 Portuguese Bend Road and 76 Eastfield Drive. With regard to the proposed staging location on Crest Road East, Allied Waste stated that it would be used on an as-needed basis and, when utilized, the “mother truck” would be stationed in a location to minimize the noise impact on the residence. Despite the resident’s desire to limit the number of days Allied Waste might use this area, the Traffic Commission supported this site as a staging location.

DISCUSSION
The Traffic Commission has reviewed and supports the 14 locations identified by Allied Waste and the City’s Traffic Engineer for staging the “mother truck” for the collection of solid waste. As such, the City Council is requested to consider and approve the Traffic Commission’s recommendation per Allied Waste’s request.

NOTIFICATION
Notice of this matter before the City Council has been provided to the community through the routine procedure of publishing the agenda in the citywide newsletter as well as through legal posting at City Hall.

CONCLUSION
Allied Waste is fully aware that they must keep their staging sites clear of debris and residue, contain refuse that falls out of their “scouts” and maintain their high quality service. Such conditions, in combination with the topography of the City and service levels desired by the community, leave few options for the method of refuse collection in the City. The “mother truck”/”scout” collection method of refuse collection appears the only functional means of collecting refuse at this time so designated staging locations are necessary.

AD:hl

Page 180 of 297 ends

Page 1 ends

Memorandum
TO: Anton Dahlerbruch, City Manager
FROM: Vanessa Munoz, City Traffic Engineer
DATE: July 7, 2009
SUBJECT: Citywide Allied Waste “ Mother Truck” loading stationing areas This memo is in response to the Traffic Commissioner’s request to re-evaluate three (3) staging locations for the Allied Waste “Mother Truck.” The locations being re-evaluated are:
• Area 1- Saddleback Road ( near Hillside)
• Area 2 - Crest Road E. and Eastfield Drive
• Area 3 - Portuguese Bend South and Ranchero Road
On May 21, 2009, Sam Pena, from Allied Waste, and I went out and re-evaluated the three locations for:
• Visibility for Allied Waste vehicles, other vehicles, pedestrians and equestrians; • Width of street;
• Traffic volumes;
• Driving distance for each Scout to the “Mother Truck” location; • Impact to passing traffic at each location.

The Area 1 location of Saddleback Road (near Hillside) was re-evaluated. The main concern expressed by the resident of 3 Hillside Lane was that her horse would get easily scared when the “Mother Truck” parked between the Saddleback easement and the riding fence. The roadway characteristics along Saddleback Road in this particular area of the City allow for the truck to be stationed further north from this location. I recommend the “Mother Truck” be stationed between 36 and 42 Saddleback Road. This location provides visibility for vehicles, equestrian riders and the Allied Waste truck.

The Area 2 location of Crest Road E. and Eastfield was re-evaluated. The main concern was noise and its proximity to the resident’s home. The parking of the truck on Eastfield Drive east of Crest Road is an acceptable location; the “Mother Truck” does not impede vehicle visibility and gives the Allied Waste vehicles easy access, the roadway has a low traffic volume and has the least impact to passing traffic. However, to accommodate the concerns of the residents, I recommend the truck be parked on the south side of Eastfield Drive. This should eliminate some of the noise and the truck would not be adjacent to the resident’s home.

The Area 3 location of Portuguese Bend South and Ranchero Road was re-evaluated. The main concern was visibility for northbound traffic. The parking of the truck at the present location is an acceptable location. From my field observation the northbound traffic is able to see the truck

Page 181 of 297 ends

Page 2 ends

Memorandum
when driving up hill. Additionally, since drivers are traveling at low speeds due to the grade on the hill, most drivers have enough time to react and stop if needed. I also evaluated the recommendation of 52 Portuguese Bend Road south as a possible staging location, however the “Mother Truck” cannot park on dirt roads and unless this area gets asphalt it cannot serve as a staging area.

VM:mec (06160)
16878/1002/M02

Page 182 of 297 ends

Page 183 of 297 ends

Page 184 of 297 ends

Page 185 of 297 ends

Summary of Citywide "Mother Truck" Staging Locations
Area 1
Location Current
Staging
Location
Requested as
Staging Location
Recommende
d
Saddleback Road and
Roadrunner Road X X
Wagon Lane X X
Georgeff Road X X
Lower Blackwater Canyon
Rd. and Middleridge Lane
North
X
Saddleback Road (between
36 and 42) X X
Area 2
Location Current
Staging
Location
Requested as
Staging Location
Recommende
d
Caballeros Road and Crest
Road East X X
Crest Road East and
Eastfield Drive X X
Chuckwagon Road and
Eastfield Drive X X
Outrider Road and Eastfield
Drive X X
Southfield Drive and
Packsaddle Road East X X
Area 3
Location Current
Staging
Location
Requested as
Staging Location
Recommende
d
Southfield Drive and
Packsaddle Road East X X
Portuguese Bend Road
South and Ranchero Rd. X X
Qualiridge Road North X X
9/5/2023

Page 186 of 297 ends

Summary of Citywide "Mother Truck" Staging Locations
Buggy Whip Drive X X
Johns Canyon Road X X
9/5/2023

Page 187 of 297 ends

Notice Data for Addresses Adjacent to Proposed Staging Locations as of 01/28/10

DATE NOTICED
Staging
Area Address Ctiy State Zip 3/20/09 ##### 9/18/09 1/22/10 1 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
1 1 Wagon Lane Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 3 Hllside Lane Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 32 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 35 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X X
1 36 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 38 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 42 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
1 67 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
2 2 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X
2 2 Outrider Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
2 34 Creast Road East Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
2 76 Eastfield Drive Rolling Hills CA 90274 X X X X
3 12 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
3 13 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
3 2 Ranchero Road Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
3 3 Crest Road West Rolling Hills CA 90274 X
2 & 3 19 Southfield Drive Rolling Hills CA 90274 X

Page 188 of 297 ends

Page 189 of 297 ends

Page 190 of 297 ends

Page 191 of 297 ends

Page 192 of 297 ends

Page 193 of 297 ends

Page 194 of 297 ends

Page 195 of 297 ends

Page 196 of 297 ends

Page 197 of 297 ends

Page 198 of 297 ends

Page 199 of 297 ends

Page 200 of 297 ends

Page 201 of 297 ends

Page 202 of 297 ends

Page 203 of 297 ends

Page 204 of 297 ends

Page 205 of 297 ends

Page 206 of 297 ends

Page 207 of 297 ends

Memorandum
TO: Karina Banales, City Manager
FROM: Vanessa Munoz PE, TE, City Traffic Engineer
DATE: May 14, 2025
SUBJECT: Mother Truck Station Expansion
This memorandum reviews the city's request for recommendations on three proposed new locations for Republic’s mother truck staging. The city has evaluated various sites including those approved in 2010 and new sites to determine suitable areas for the mother truck staging and scooter to safely maneuver while minimizing inconvenience to the residents and vehicle conflicts.

The table below shows sites that consistently work for weekly service, which occur once a week for no more than a 4-hour window at each location. Republic is requesting to use the listed sites below:

Location Current
Staging
Location
New
Staging
Location
Acceptable
Staging
Location
1 Roadrunner X X
2 Poppy Trail (at Saddleback/Portugues
Bend Road)
X X
3 52 Portuguese Bend Rd. S. X X
4 Outrider Rd/Eastfield Dr. X X
5 Crest Rd. E/Eastfield Dr. X X
6 Georgeff Rd. X X
7 Caballeros/Crest Rd. E X X
8 Buggy Whip Dr/Crest Rd W. X X
9 Southfield Dr/Packsaddle Rd. E. X X

I evaluated the proposed sites for sight visibility, street width, traffic volumes, driving distance for each scout to the mother truck staging location and impact to passing traffic at each location and concluded all three proposed new sites are acceptable.

Page 208 of 297 ends

Page 209 of 297 ends

Page 210 of 297 ends

Page 211 of 297 ends

Page 212 of 297 ends

Page 213 of 297 ends

Page 214 of 297 ends

Page 215 of 297 ends

Page 216 of 297 ends

Item: 12.B.

Meeting Date: 7/28/2025
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Consideration of awarding a construction contract to Fidelity Builders, Inc. for providing construction services on the Tennis Court ADA Improvement Project in an amount not-to-exceed $783,506.25, Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement, and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
Background:

At the June 12, 2023 City Council Meeting, city staff reported on a coordination meeting with the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) held in May 2023. At this meeting, it was communicated that the City's Tennis Courts ADA Improvement Project (TC-ADA) would incorporate the grading and retaining wall to support the RHCA's Cabana improvement/amenities project. This addition to the City's improvement plans was determined based on concerns over the sequence of construction and to facilitate workflow between contractors commissioned by the city and the RHCA. City staff, RHCA, and Bolton Engineering held two subsequent coordination meetings on June 6, 2023, and June 14, 2023, to discuss outstanding items and update all parties.

On June 26, 2023 the City Council directed staff to advertise the TC-ADA for bids and approved the allocation for landscape, irrigation, and lighting plans. The City Council would be provided the opportunity to review the results of the construction bids and ultimately decide whether to award a contract at a later date.

On July 10, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 1344, authorizing a budget amendment to transfer $307,000 from reserves to the Capital Projects Fund for this project.

On July 12, 2023, City staff began the first of many monthly meetings with the RHCA regarding project coordination and the process for further submissions to LACBS.

On July 24, 2023, the City Council was asked to approve RHCA’s conceptual design so they could submit plans to Los Angeles County Building & Safety (LACBS) to begin the permitting process. The Council voted to approve it as presented, noting that it would discuss the proposed firepit when the item comes back in the future.

Page 217 of 297 ends

In August 2023, staff worked on addressing LACBS requirements for Low-Impact Development (LID) standards. The RHCA finalized their plans for submission to LACBS and began preparing to get estimates on their Cabana project.

In October 2023, LACBS acknowledged receipt of resubmittals but did not indicate a timeframe for response. The retaining wall plans were approved.

In November 2023, the RHCA shared plans for the expansion of Tennis Court #1, a proposal for the scope of work, and cost estimates. Staff and the RHCA continued with planning/staging discussions to lead responsibility for the various project components.

In December 2023, as part of the ongoing discussions, the RHCA provided staff with plans, two bids from 2022, and a staff memo that described the tennis club’s request and scope of work for the rebuilding and expansion of Court #1. The RHCA agreed to send an overview of their construction program with timelines and key milestones.

In January 2024, staff received approved grading plans from LACBS. RHCA enlisted the services of the Bergman Group to help with construction management, and LACBS began its second round of review on RHCA’s cabana
On March 25, 2024, City staff provided a status update to the City Council as outlined in this report.

On April 22, 2024, the City Council unanimously approved assigning the RHCA to lead responsibility for the combined TC- ADA and Cabana projects. The city then took the lead in constructing the subsequent Tennis Court #1 Expansion Project.

At the June 24, 2024, City Council meeting, staff presented that due to financial constraints caused by significant infrastructure repairs requiring immediate attention, the RHCA had reconsidered their approach and requested reverting to the initial concept with the City leading the ADA component of the Tennis Court improvements. To assist with the fiscal impact, the RHCA board had agreed, per lease agreement obligations, to contribute 50% of the associated cost for the TC- ADA. The RHCA board allocated $400,000 and would review and consider additional funding if required. Based on this information, the City Council authorized reallocating funds from the capital account designated for the Tennis Court 1 expansion project back to the TC-ADA.

On August 26, 2024, the City Council approved a contract with the Bergeman Group for Construction Management Services.

On November 6, 2024, staff released a public notice of bid for the Tennis Court Improvement Project, Job No. 2024-01, with a closing date of December 3, 2024. While interested parties attended the mandatory job walk, upon closing, no interested bidders submitted.

On January 14, 2025, staff re-released a public notice of bid for Tennis Court Improvement Project, Job No. 2025-01 Request for Bid. On February 18, 2025, the City received three (3) sealed bids at the 2 pm Bid Closing that totaled from $700,360 to $2,648,138.83.

On April 14, 2025, staff presented the three bids for the City Council's consideration and potential awarding to the lowest responsible bidder. The City Council, in the public interest, rejected all bids and requested staff re-issue the bid again in the hopes that more contractors would participate and lower the bid amount. Staff revised the bid and accompanying breakdown form with the intention of simplifying the process for interested bidders.

Page 218 of 297 ends

Rolling Hills City CouncilJuly 28, 2025

Rolling Hills City Council
July 28, 2025