Rolling Hills City Council
March 9, 2026

1 City Council
Monday, March 9, 2026, 7:00 PM
Regular Meeting
City of Rolling Hills
The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The City Council meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. View both the agenda and the live-streamed video.

Members of the public may submit written comments by emailing the City Clerk’s office at [email protected]. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record if received before 3pm on the meeting day. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.

View recordings to City Council meetings online.

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Pledge of Allegiance

4. Presentations/Proclamations/Announcements

5. Approve Order of the Agenda
This is the appropriate time for the Mayor or Councilmembers to approve the agenda as is or reorder.

6. Blue Folder Items (Supplemental)
Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.

7. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will take place on any items not on the agenda.

2 8. Consent Calendar
Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any Councilmember may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Councilmembers for discussion.

8.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Approve.

8.B. Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda
RECOMMENDATION:

8.C. Approve the following Minutes: February 9, 2026 City Council Special Field Trip Meeting, February 23, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.D. Payment of Bills
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.E. Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports for January 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.

8.F. Amendment to 2023 Professional Services Agreement with HQE Systems to install Fourth Siren Pole at Upper Blackwater Canyon / Portuguese Bend Road (Garden Triangle), increase compensation by $48,335.96, extend term by 1 year, find the same exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3), and authorize City Manager to execute Amendment
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.G. Consider and approve the Planned Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Safe, Clean Water (Measure W) Municipal Program Funds for submission to Los Angeles County Flood Control District
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.

8.H. Receive and file the Annual Progress Reports for the General Plan and Housing Element
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.

9. Excluded Consent Calendar Items

10. Commission Items

10.A. Receive and file Zoning Case No. 25-091: Site plan review for new construction, non-exempt grading and related improvements; variances for an attached garage

3 within the side yard areas, and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for location at 3 Maverick Lane (Karatsu) (Lot 30-SK) RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.

10.B. Receive and file Zoning Case No. 25-115: Site plan review for new construction, non-exempt grading and related improvements; variances for an attached garage within front yard, addition to home in side yard, and to exceed 40 percent disturbance; and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for location at 2 Williamsburg Lane (Paesano) (Lots 44, 45, & 46-A-RH) RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.

11. Public Hearings

12. Discussion Items

12.A. Adoption of Resolution No. 1404 approving Volume 1 and the Rolling Hills portion of Volume 2 within the 2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 1404 approving Volume I and the Rolling Hills portion of Volume II of the 2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.

13. Matters From the City Council

14. Matters From Staff

14.A. Receive a verbal report regarding Bennett Landscape's invitation to participate in their 2026 Arbor Day tree planting and provide direction to staff RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.

15. Recess to Closed Session

15.A. Conference with Legal Counsel—Initiation of Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. (1 case)

16. Reconvene to Open Session

17. Adjournment
Next regular meeting: Monday, March 23, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274.

4 Notice:

Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.

Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting.

Item: 8.A.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of March 9, 2026 Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve.

Attachments:

1. CL_AGN_260309_CC_AffidavitofPosting

Administrative Report

8.A., File # 2026-47 Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
From: Christian Horvath, City Clerk
TITLE
APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 9, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below.

Legislative Body City Council
Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda
Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window
City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agendas_meetings.php https://rollinghillsca.portal.civicclerk.com/
Meeting Date & Time MARCH 9, 2026 7:00pm Open Session
As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below.

Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Date: March 6, 2026

Item: 8.C.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve the following Minutes: February 9, 2026 City Council Special Field Trip Meeting, February 23, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. CL_MIN_260209_CC_FT_F

2. CL_MIN_260223_CC_F

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FIELD TRIP MEETING
Monday, February 9, 2026

Minutes
Rolling Hills City Council
Monday, February 9, 2026
Special Field Trip Meeting 7:30 a.m.

1. Call To Order
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met at 10 Saddleback Road on the above date at 7:30 a.m. Mayor Dieringer presiding.

2. Roll Call
Councilmembers Present: Mirsch, Wilson, Pieper, Mayor Dieringer Councilmembers Absent: Black
Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Reina Schaetzl, Willdan Contract Senior Planner
Emma Montes, Assistant Planner

3. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items - None

4. Public Hearing Field Trip

4.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Special Field Trip Meeting of February 9, 2025
Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve Item 4A. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: Black

4.B. Site plan review for new construction, non-exempt grading and related improvements; variances for a detached garage within front and side yard area, detached pool house within rear yard area, deck exceeding 12”, import of soil, and to exceed 40 percent disturbance; Conditional Use Permit to exceed 200 square feet for accessory structures, and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Birkett) (Lot 17-2-RH) Presentation by Willdan Contract Senior Planner Schaetzl Public Comment: Russ Bartow, Dr. Ralph Black, Stephen Birkett

5. Adjournment:

The meeting was adjourned at 7:56 a.m. on February 9, 2026 to the regular City Council meeting on February 9, 2026, beginning at 7:00 p.m.at 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274.

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FIELD TRIP MEETING
Monday, February 9, 2026

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Bea Dieringer, Mayor

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 23, 2026

Minutes
Rolling Hills City Council
Monday, February 23, 2026
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m.

1. Call To Order
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Dieringer presiding.

2. Roll Call
Councilmembers Present: Mirsch, Wilson, Pieper, Black, Mayor Dieringer Councilmembers Absent:

Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Robert Samario, Finance Director
Nicolas Papajohn, City Attorney

3. Pledge Of Allegiance – Mayor Pro Tem Black

4. Presentations / Proclamations / Announcements – None

5. Approve Order of the Agenda
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Black, seconded by Councilmember Pieper to approve the order of the agenda.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

6. Blue Folder Items (Supplemental) – None

7. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items
Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath read a letter from Roger Hawkins into the record.

8. Consent Calendar

8.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of February 23, 2026

8.B. Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda

8.C. Approve the following Minutes of February 9, 2026: City Council Regular Meeting

8.D. Payment of Bills
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve the Consent Calendar.

Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 23, 2026

AYES: Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

9. Excluded Consent Calendar Items – None

10. Commission Items – None

11. Public Hearings – None

12. Discussion Items

12.A. Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025
Presentation by Finance Director Samario
LSL Senior Manager Jayme Lambert.

Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

13. Matters From the City Council
Mayor Dieringer discussed her opposition, on behalf of the City Council, during the recent Board of Supervisor’s vote regarding a five-year ½ cent sales tax increase measure.

13.A. Receive and file an update on the South Bay Cities Council of Governments annual membership dues
Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath The City Council directed staff to prepare an analysis on the value the City receives from participation in South Bay Cities Council of Governments as related to the annual membership fee, communicate what joint programs are required for the City to utilize, and what the repercussions would be should the City withdraw.

Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:

AYES: Mirsch, Pieper, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None

14. Matters From Staff – None

15. Recess To Closed Session – None

16. Reconvene To Open Session – None

17. Adjournment: 7:39 p.m.

MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, February 23, 2026

The meeting was adjourned at 7:39 p.m. on February 23, 2026. The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held on Monday, March 9, 2026 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via City’s website link at:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.

Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Bea Dieringer, Mayor

Item: 8.D.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Payment of Bills
Background:

None.

Discussion:

None.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. CL_AGN_260309_CC_PaymentOfBills_E

Item: 8.E.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports for January 2026 Background:

On July 1, 2020, the City entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement with Republic Services for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste, including recyclables, green waste, bulky items, and brush. The Agreement is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2029.

As part of this partnership, the city regularly receives and reviews Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports from Republic Services. These reports serve several important municipal, regulatory, and community functions.

Discussion:

The primary purpose of the Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports is to provide the City with oversight and transparency regarding its waste management and recycling services. These reports enable the City to monitor the volume of waste and recyclable materials collected and processed, as well as identify any recurring service issues or resident complaints. By regularly reviewing these reports, the City can ensure that Republic Services is fulfilling its contractual obligations, promptly addressing service deficiencies, and making informed decisions related to public education and operational improvements. Additionally, the reports support compliance with recycling and waste diversion, while supplying essential data for planning and reporting to regulatory agencies.

Below are highlights of the types of reports and notes included:

Recycling Tonnage Report: Documents the total weight of recyclable materials collected, helping the City measure progress toward recycling and waste diversion goals and comply with mandated requirements.

Complaint Report: Logs resident complaints related to waste and recycling services—such as missed pickups or other service issues, to enable tracking of service quality and resolution of recurring concerns.

Red Tags Report: Records instances where a "red tag" is issued at an address, indicating a violation or another issue with waste practices.

Missed Pick-Up Report: Details incidents where scheduled waste pickups were missed, including the address, date, and resolution status.

Commercial Recycling: Commercial recycling materials are hauled to various transfer facilities, with a portion separated and recovered. Recovery rates from these facilities are reported monthly and applied to servicing areas.

Greenwaste Reporting: Greenwaste data in the Non-Franchise report may fluctuate monthly due to factors like changes in customer service types, load contamination, or data entry errors.

Resident Services: Residents may request one free roll-off container for green waste disposal once a year. Monthly Residential Franchise Reports highlight usage of these bins.

Diversion Requirements: Under the current Agreement between the City and Republic Services, Republic Services is required to achieve a minimum annual Diversion Rate of 30% for Residential Solid Waste Collection Services, or such amount as may be set in accordance with other changes in law which mandate certain actions of programs for municipalities. The City currently achieves compliance with California’s recycling and waste diversion requirements rate of at least 50% by diverting green waste (such as yard trimmings and plant matter) from landfills and incorporating it into its overall waste management program.

The Republic Services team continues to search for mixed waste options, and while they have a prospect that looks promising, they are trying to work through some issues before settling on their decision.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Free Residential Roll-Off Bin
As mentioned, the City offers residents the opportunity to request one free roll-off container annually for green waste disposal. According to the current Residential Franchise Reports, entries labeled “Greenwaste – Free Residential Roll-Off Bin” and “Trash-Free Residential Roll-Off Bin.” Although the City does not provide free roll-off bins for regular trash collection, the presence of “Trash-Free Residential Roll-Off Bin” in the report may indicate one of two possibilities:
• When Republic Services retrieves the bin and returns it to their facility, they may have identified contamination in the green waste bin, such as non-green waste disposed of improperly.
• Alternatively, this may be due to data entry or keying errors that require correction.

Republic Services continues to work on the reporting of this item. It is important to note that the City is not covering the cost associated with "trash-free" roll-off bins.

Red Tag Report Abbreviations
COMM: This column refers to Commercial service status. While Republic Services uses a standard red-tag reporting template across all its service jurisdictions, the City of Rolling Hills does not have commercial waste service. Therefore, entries under “COMM” are marked as “NO” for applicable red tags within the City.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Receive and file.

Attachments:

1. VC_REP_260226_Jan_TonnageReport

2. VC_REP_260226_Jan_C&D_Report

3. VC_REP_260226_Jan_CallLog

4. VC_REP_260203_JanuaryRedTagList

5. VC_REP_260203_JanuaryComplaintList

Year 2026
Diversion Requirement Y
Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 Greenwaste 89.97 89.97 -

26.16 26.16 -
174.59 - 174.59
Greenwaste - Free Residential Roll Off Bin
Trash
-
1 Total 290.72 116.13 174.59
Grand Total 290.72 116.13 174.59
100.00%
100.00%

0.00%

39.95%

39.95%

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE
2026

Year 2026
Diversion Requirement N
Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 Recycle 0.16 0.07 0.09 42.94%
Trash 64.25 - 64.25 0.00%
Organics 0.02 0.01 0.01 67.20%
1 Total 64.43 0.08 64.35 0.12%
Grand Total 64.43 0.08 64.35 0.12%

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NON-FRANCHISE
2026

Republic Services City of Rolling Hills
C&D Report Reporting Period January-26
Disposal Site Material Loads Taken Tons Collected
*No C&D to report this month
Summary
Row Labels Sum of Tons Collected
(blank)
Grand Total

Republic Services Call Log Report
City: Rolling Hills
Year 2026
Month/Quarter 1
Summary of Calls by Type
Final Call
Final Call Type Sub-Type Total

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Yard Waste - Residential 1

3.Missed Pick Up Total 1
Grand Total 1
Pg 1 of 2

Republic Services Call Log Report
Final Call Type Sub-Type Case Number
Date/Time
Opened
Date/Time
Closed
Created
By Request Description Resolution Comments Customer Category Account Number Site Account Name Site Address Phone

3.Missed Pick Up Missed Yard Waste - Residential 20260113-229617484 1/13/2026
9:05 AM
1/14/2026
11:36 AM
Lauren
Gago
Christy Mckay/(619) 507-
6059 states they have
been missed fo r the
pickup originally
scheduled on 1/12/2026.

Cx ci thier YW was not pu
on 01/12
(blank) RESI 9020003667 1

CURRENT

RESIDENT
24 GEORGEFF RD

ROLLING HILLS CA
(000) 000-0000
Pg 2 of 2

City of Rolling Hills - January 2026 Republic Services Red Tag List Republic Services - Red Tag List
Date of
Issue
Time Issue
Resident
Name
Resident Address Republic
Response
1/12/2026 4:20 PM Unbundled branches 67 Portuguese Bend Rd. Lori Reyna 1/20/2026 7:33 AM Containers behind locked area 7 Maverick Ln. Kash Knudson

City of Rolling Hills - January 2026 Republic Services Complaint Log Date of Issue Time Issue/Complaint Resident Name Resident Address Republic contacted
Republic
Reponse
1/5/2026 1:00 PM Missed Trash and Green Waste John Tu 8 Crest Rd. E. Lori Reyna Lori Reyna 1/6/2026 10:00 AM Missed Trash and Green Waste Amy Josefek 2 Chuckwagon Rd. Lori Reyna Lori Reyna 1/12/2026 11:50 AM Missed Trash and Green Waste Sherrie Cipolla 14 Buggy Whip Dr. Lori Reyna Lori Reyna 1/16/2026 8:00 AM Missed Trash and Green Waste Teresa Hassanally 27 Portuguese Bend Rd. Lori Reyna Lori Reyna

Item: 8.F.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Samantha Crew, Management Analyst
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Amendment to 2023 Professional Services Agreement with HQE Systems to install Fourth Siren Pole at Upper Blackwater Canyon / Portuguese Bend Road (Garden Triangle), increase compensation by $48,335.96, extend term by 1 year, find the same exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3), and authorize City Manager to execute Amendment
Background:

At the February 9, 2026 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to pay HQE the remaining balance for work performed under the 2023 PSA, proceed with installation of a fourth siren pole at the Upper Blackwater Canyon / Portuguese Bend Road triangle, and return with an amended contract (Attachment A) reflecting the expanded scope of work.

Under the 2023 PSA (Attachment B), HQE was responsible for delivering a turnkey outdoor emergency communications system consisting of three 50-foot speaker towers, each capable of producing intelligible voice and tone alerts. The system was installed in September 2024 at the Fire Station, Crest Road East Gate, and City Hall and are currently operational.

Following installation and testing of the initial three sirens, staff coordinated with HQE to evaluate potential expansion scenarios aimed at improving system coverage in areas where lower sound propagation levels were identified, including Upper Blackwater, Chesterfield, and Ringbit. The current action advances the Upper Blackwater location consistent with prior Council direction, while staff will return at a later date with a separate staff report seeking Council consideration of proposed siren locations in the Chesterfield and Ringbit areas.

The siren project was initiated through advocacy by the City’s Block Captains, reflecting a communitydriven effort to strengthen public safety, preparedness, and overall resiliency by enhancing emergency notification capabilities.

Discussion:

Through detailed sound modeling, terrain analysis, and propagation mapping, HQE identified Upper Blackwater Canyon Road / Portuguese Bend Road (Garden Triangle) as a key infill location necessary to close remaining coverage gaps following installation of the initial three sirens. The

addition of this site, together with potential future installations in the Chesterfield and Ringbit Road areas, represents a good-faith effort to meet recognized industry standards for outdoor warning siren systems and to align with FEMA guidance related to redundancy, intelligibility, and equitable geographic distribution of sound.

On October 30, 2025, the City formally requested authorization from the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) to place a 50-foot outdoor emergency siren within the Garden Triangle area near Upper Blackwater Canyon Road and Portuguese Bend Road. After conducting a site inspection and evaluating the request, the RHCA Board approved the easement license by a 3–1 vote, with one board member not present. With RHCA licensing secured, HQE is prepared to proceed with planning and permitting for this location. Site evaluations, sound-map reviews, utility coordination, neighborhood outreach, pole mock-ups, and the RHCA licensing process have been completed to validate this site as the preferred option with minimal visual and community impact.

At the February 9 meeting, the City Council also directed staff to work with HQE to prepare a map identifying SAFE gateway placement locations to support optimal SAFE Network coverage. HQE anticipates installing gateways on the existing siren poles as well as at the Upper Blackwater location and while this configuration will establish the foundational network infrastructure, it will not initially provide full citywide coverage. As residents adopt the system and install SAFE units at their properties, those units are expected to function as relays within the mesh network architecture, thereby incrementally strengthening and expanding coverage over time. Staff is coordinating with HQE to further refine the mapping analysis and will return at a later date with the completed map for Council review.

Amendments to-date:

PSA/Amendments Date
Original PSA June 26, 2023
Amendment No. 1 December 11, 2024
Amendment No. 2 February 24, 2025
Amendment No. 3 September 2, 2025
Amendment No. 4 October 28, 2025
All amendments to date have consisted of time extensions only.

Proposed Amendment No. 5 Current Action
Amendment No. 5 adjusts contract terms to include installation of the Upper Blackwater siren and represents the first substantive modification to the scope of services.The amendment also formally recognizes the SAFE Grant, offered by HQE to the City, which establishes a separate notification system and provides the City with the added benefit of emergency notification redundancy.

The proposed Amendment to the 2023 PSA, drafted by the City Attorney, incorporates the additional scope necessary to install the fourth 50-foot siren pole at Upper Blackwater Canyon / Portuguese Bend Road, provide associated equipment and integration consistent with the existing system, and extend contractual terms as needed to complete the expanded work. Approval of the Amendment will allow staff to coordinate with HQE to initiate planning, permitting, and pre-construction activities, moving the City closer to achieving improved outdoor warning coverage.

Environmental Analysis
This project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (Class 3), which exempts the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities, equipment, or structures. Here, the proposed project is the installation of one siren pole, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA. None of the exceptions apply.

Fiscal Impact:

Upper Blackwater & Portuguese Bend Road (Garden Triangle) Outdoor Emergency Siren Budget Summary Estimate
Total Labor $21,875.71
Other Direct Costs $23,398.54
Equipment - One (1) Onmidirectional 50 ft LS-120$48,335.96

Total Estimate
$93,610.21

Total Cost to City
$48,335.96
Optional Maintenance Cost can be determined at a later date.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - CA_AGR_260309_HQE_SirenInstallation_Amendment05_F

2. Attachment B - CA_AGR_230706_HQE_SirenInstallation_F_A2_E

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Fifth Amendment”) is made and entered into this 28th day of February, 2026 between the City of Rolling Hills, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY'' and HQE Systems, Inc., a California corporation located at 27419 Via Industria, Temecula, CA 92590 (“CONSULTANT.”)

1. RECITALS:

A. On June 26, 2023, the CITY entered into a Professional Services Agreement with CONSULTANT (“Agreement”) to provide design, procurement and installation of a turnkey emergency communications system for the CITY, including but not limited to the installation of three 50 foot speaker towers (“Towers”) at three separate locations throughout the CITY to provide outdoor sound coverage across the CITY; B. After installation, testing of the Towers in March 2025 showed gaps in sound coverage in certain parts of the City;
C. Following the testing in March 2025, over the course of several months, CITY staff and CONSULTANT worked to identify and evaluate more than 50 other potential locations for additional Towers to address the gaps in sound coverage; D. CONSULTANT identified the Garden Triangle area near Upper Blackwater Canyon Road and Portuguese Bend Road (“Upper Blackwater”) as a key location for improved sound coverage through detailed sound modeling, terrain analysis, and propagation mapping;
E. CONSULTANT has also committed to the installation of their public safety communication SAFE Network System at no cost to the CITY and at-cost pricing for Indoor SAFE units for residents through the 2026 Community SAFE Grant to further enhance the CITY’s emergency communications system;
F. On October 30, 2025, CITY formally requested authorization from the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) to place a fourth 50 foot Tower at the Upper Blackwater location as part of the proposed expansion of CITY’s emergency alert system.

After conducting a site inspection and evaluating the request, the RHCA Board considered the application and approved the easement license by a 3–1 vote, with one board member not present for the vote;
G. The First through Fourth Amendments extended the term of the Agreement to give CONSULTANT and CITY time to determine how to best address the gaps in sound coverage; and

H. Now, CITY and CONSULTANT desire to amend the Agreement for a fifth time (the “Fifth Amendment”) to install a fourth Tower at the Upper Blackwater location (“Upper Blackwater Tower”) to improve sound coverage throughout the CITY, increase compensation by $48,335.96 to cover the cost of installation of the Upper Blackwater Tower, extend the term of the Agreement, and incorporate CONSULTANT’s 2026 Community SAFE Grant.

Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained, CITY hereby engages CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT agrees to perform the services set forth in this Fifth Amendment.

2. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

3. Paragraph 2 (SCOPE OF WORK) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“CONSULTANT shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to CITY the services set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The end result of the services shall include a turnkey emergency communications system which includes, but is not limited to; (i) four three, 50 foot speaker towers (two directional and two one omnidirectional) equipped with intelligible voice and tone capability at the four three locations identified in Exhibit A and referred to as the First Station Tower, Easter Gate Tower, and City Hall Tower, and Upper Blackwater Tower which shall result in a system that, at a minimum, produces the specified Sound Pressure Level identified by the Original Equipment Manufacturer to ensure proper coverage. Outside of extraordinary circumstances on a property (e.g. loud generator, wall of 100' trees covering the perimeter of a property, etc.), CONSULTANT warrants that the system is designed to reach 70 dB at each residence in the City; (ii) speaker/audio system that can provide the listed decibel levels throughout the City as described in Exhibit A; (iii) system that can be managed and activated via an Advanced Communication Module (ACM) to remotely access, control and activate via a secure portal; (iv) reasonable efforts such that the system may be integrated with other regional alert systems which may require additional costs (collectively referred to as "SERVICES").

Additionally, as part of the SERVICES in Exhibit A, CONSULTANT agrees to the installation of their public safety communication SAFE Network System at no cost to the CITY and at-cost pricing for Indoor SAFE units for CITY residents through the 2026 Community SAFE Grant to further enhance the CITY’s emergency communications system.

To the extent this Agreement conflicts with Exhibit A, or any other exhibit, this Agreement shall control.”

4. Paragraph 3 (COST) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“The CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT for all the work contemplated by this AGREEMENT in the amount of Three Hundred Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Five Dollars and Ninety Six Cents Two Hundred Sixty One Thousand Dollars

($309,335.96 261,000.00). The cost is more particularly described in Exhibit A. This fee includes all expenses, consisting of all local travel, attendance at meetings, printing and submission of any plans or any other documents required by the Scope of Work. Any increase in contract amount or scope shall be approved by expressed written amendment executed by the CITY and CONSULTANT.”

5. Paragraph 11 (TERM) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“The term of this Agreement shall be from the effective date of this Agreement to February 28, 2027 2026 unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner within the term of this Agreement and shall commence performance upon notice from the City.”

6. Paragraph 16 (INDEMNITY) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“CONSULTANT shall indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officers and employees from all claims, damages, suits, cost or actions of every name, kind or description, brought for, or on account of, (i) injuries to or death of any person, (ii) damage to property or (iii) arising from performance of this AGREEMENT in any manner that resulted from the fault or negligence of CONSULTANT, it officers, agents, employees and/or servants in connection with this AGREEMENT.

CITY shall indemnify and save harmless CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, employees, and servants from all claims, damages, suits, costs or actions of every name, kind, or description, brought for, or on account of, (i) injuries to or death of any person, (ii) damage to property or (iii) arising from performance of this AGREEMENT in any manner that resulted from the fault or negligence of the CITY CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, employees, and/or servants in connection with this AGREEMENT.

If CONSULTANT should subcontract all or any portion of the SERVICES to be performed under this AGREEMENT, CONSULTANT shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the term of the preceding paragraph. This section shall survive termination or expiration of this AGREEMENT.”

7. Exhibit “A” attached to this Fifth Amendment shall be added to Exhibit “A” of the Agreement.

8. All terms and conditions of the Agreement not amended by this Fifth Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.
[Signatures on Following Page]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fifth Amendment on the date and year below with the intent that this Fifth Amendment be effective as of February 28, 2026.

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSULTANT

CITY MANAGER
______ _____ ________
Karina Bañales Qais Alkurdi, CEO
DATE: DATE:

ATTEST:
______ _____

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______ _____

NICOLAS PAPAJOHN, CITY ATTORNEY

EXHIBIT “A”

ESTIMATE FOR:

City of Rolling Hills
Upper Blackwater
(Estimate: 006cw00000Ijzg5)
Date Submitted: March 4, 2026
Proposal Prepared For: Proposal Approved By:

City of Rolling Hills HQE Systems Inc.
2 Portuguese Bend Rd 27348 Via Industria
Rolling Hills, CA, 9027 Temecula, CA 92590
POC: Ms. Karina Banales POC: Mr. Qais Alkurdi
Title: City Manager Title: Chief Executive Officer
Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tel: (310) 377-1521 Tel: (800) 967-3036 X1102
This proposal contains trade secrets and confidential business or financial information exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed—in whole or in part—for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of—or in connection with—the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use the information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in this proposal and all attachments. All product names, logos, and brands are the property of their respective owners. All company, product, and service names used in this proposal are for identification purposes only. Using these names, logos, and brands do not imply endorsement.

Summary
HQE Systems, Inc., a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), is pleased to provide the below cost for outdoor emergency sirens at Upper Blackwater. Offer is valid for 90 days. This estimate is in response to the customer’s request for:
● Upper Blackwater Fiscal Impacts
○ Cost breakdown for One (1) Omni-directional 50ft LS-120 at the Upper Blackwater location
Please submit any resulting purchase order or contract to [email protected] Cost Proposal
Upper Blackwater - One (1) Omni-directional 50ft LS-120 # Budget Summary Estimate
1 Total Labor (HQE Responsibility) $ 21,875.71
2 Other Direct Costs (HQE Responsibility) $ 23,398.54
3 Equipment (Rollings Hills Responsibility) $ 48,335.96 Total Estimate $ 93,610.21
Costs to the City of Rolling Hills $ 48, 335.96
# Labor Category Hours Rate Total
1 Program Management 13 $ 120.87 $ 1,571.31
2 Project Management 30 $ 102.35 $ 3,070.50
3 Field Engineer 113 $ 72.24 $ 8,163.12
4 Electronics Technician III 73 $ 63.86 $ 4,661.78
5 Electronics Technician II 73 $ 57.09 $ 4,167.57
6 Trainer (Preparation & Instructions) 1 $ 51.73 $ 51.73 7 Autocad/Drafter 2 $ 94.85 $ 189.70
Total Hours 305 Total Labor * $ 21,875.71
*Costs to HQE Systems
HQE SYSTEMS, INC. | A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

# Travel & ODC's QTY Unit Price Total
1 Travel, including lodging, flights & meals 1 $ 5,561.50 $ 5,561.50 2 Rental Vehicles & Gas 1 $ 1,674.13 $ 1,674.13
3 Shipping 1 $ 1,699.57 $ 1,699.57
4 Bucket Truck, Daily 7 $ 509.62 $ 3,567.34
5 Line Truck, Daily 3 $ 3,632.00 $ 10,896.00
Total ODC's (Costs to HQE) $ 23,398.54
# Part # Equipment Descriptions QTY Unit Price Total
1 SiRcom: LS-120
SLA, Digital, Omni-Directional LS-120
Line Arrays, PA-11D, Complete Set
1 $ 44,469.08 $ 44,469.08
2 HQE-Wood-Pole Direct Burial Wood Pole, 50' 1 $ 3,866.88 $ 3,866.88 Total Equipment (Costs to the City of Rolling Hills) $ 48,335.96 System Specifications
Upper Blackwater Interactive Map LINK
Speaker Types: Intelligible Voice & Tone
● Intelligible Voice and Tone Sirens
○ Make/Model: SiRcom, Line Arrays
Power: Battery System
● No SCE electrical support requirements
● The system is engineered to provide the City with a full operational capability without any AC main power source for charging. All charging will be done through solar power.

Comms: Advanced Communications Module (ACM)
● The system will be managed and activated via the Central Control Station (CCS) and SiRcom Advanced Communications Module (ACM) provided in PSA Exhibit A.

Price: $93,610.21.00 (Full turnkey installation), includes the following:
● Equipment
○ QTY 1, Omni-directional LAS-4-120 Complete Set
■ Full battery operated with solar charging
■ Real-time systems health monitoring
■ Mounted on Class II wood poles
● Services to be proposed
○ Design support
○ Installations labor
HQE SYSTEMS, INC. | A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

○ Training for City administrators
○ Test and Turnover
○ Full community outreach package
○ Marketing assets (flyers, information brochures)
○ Social media post templates
○ Video templates
○ PR release templates
● 1 Year Full Warranty
Optional Maintenance
Yearly Maintenance: $5,045.25 per year (Upper Blackwater) ● Hassle free maintenance service
○ Annual preventive maintenance visit
■ Manufacturer’s standard testing
■ Cleaning of all of the parts (clean, grease, seal)
■ Replace degraded or damaged parts
○ As required corrective maintenance support (remote and onsite) ● No cost to replace any faulty parts (Act of God, Vandalism, Unauthorized Repairs/Access by the City or 3rd Party Vendor not covered), includes:
● Siren parts
● Solar charging parts
● 12V batteries
● Wires, cabling, and consumable parts
● Up to 5 hours of annual refresher training for the activation software ● Annual data usage for Satellite and Cellular Communications HQE SYSTEMS, INC. | A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

Term Extension Options
The following table outlines the proposed contract extension options, which consolidate comprehensive service for the three existing locations (City Hall, Fire Station, and Crest Road) alongside the new Upper Blackwater installation. To ensure continued reliability and support, this updated pricing reflects current economic rates, accounting for standard inflation and increased overhead costs. #
Bumper-To-Bumper
Service Plan (Years)
Fixed Firm Cost
(Yearly Rate)
Discount
Rate
Annual Discount
Amount
Total Saved During
Service Plan Period
Final Fixed Firm Cost
(Discounted Yearly Rate)
1 1 $ 20,181.00 0% $0.00 $0.00 $20,181.00
2 3 $ 20,181.00 2% $403.62 $1,210.86 $19,777.38
3 5 $ 20,181.00 4% $807.24 $4,036.20 $19,373.76
4 7 $ 20,181.00 7% $1,412.67 $9,888.69 $18,768.33
5 10 $ 20,181.00 10% $2,018.10 $20,181.00 $18,162.90
HQE SYSTEMS, INC. | A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

End of Estimate
“Our goal at HQE is to continue to serve our veterans through our ‘Hire Veterans Policy HQE-2015-2025’.

We appreciate our current and past customers who have helped us meet our goals of hiring veterans throughout the years. Your support in HQE is directly impacting the support of our incredible veterans.

Thank you for your consideration and support of Minority Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)!” Thank You from the team of HQE Systems Inc.

Qais Alkurdi
CEO, Disabled Veteran / Retired
HQE SYSTEMS, INC. | A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal.

2026 Community SAFE Grant (CSG) Award
Presented by HQE Systems, Inc.
“Thank You For Supporting The Veteran Community!”
Dear Members of the City Council and Leadership of Rolling Hills, On behalf of HQE Systems, Inc., we are honored to present the City of Rolling Hills with the 2026 Community SAFE Grant (CSG). This grant represents our commitment as a veteran-owned organization to strengthening local life-saving capabilities for communities that exemplify unwavering support for U.S. veterans. The residents, Block Captains, City management, and leadership of Rolling Hills have been steadfast allies to HQE Systems, a California Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE). Your collective efforts to build a safer, stronger community inspire us, and we are excited to partner with you in advancing public safety.

The Community SAFE Grant is an initiative created by the veterans of HQE Systems. Each year, we select one community to receive cutting-edge technology aimed at enhancing life-saving capabilities and resilience. For 2026, we are privileged to award this grant to Rolling Hills, a city that has stood out for its remarkable dedication to its residents and veterans alike.

What the CSG Includes:

1. SAFE Network System
The cornerstone of the CSG package is the installation of the SAFE Network System, a revolutionary public safety communications network designed to operate independently of cellular or AC power. This system ensures uninterrupted communication between the City’s leadership, emergency management team, and residents, even during catastrophic events when traditional communication methods fail.

The SAFE Network operates through a decentralized, self-sustaining framework that uses advanced radio frequency technology to maintain reliable communication. It is specifically designed to provide seamless connectivity during disasters, empowering emergency responders and city leaders to make critical decisions and keep residents informed when it matters most. ● HQE’s Equipment Cost: $9,278.52
● HQE’s Total Cost (including labor and other direct costs): $21,374.35 ● Open Market Value: Over $30,000+
The SAFE Network provides unmatched reliability and resilience, delivering $30,000+ in public safety communication technology to Rolling Hills—at no cost to the City.

2. Indoor SAFE Units for Homes
As part of the CSG, HQE is offering at-cost pricing for up to 2100 Indoor SAFE Units, allowing residents to benefit from this advanced safety technology at significantly reduced costs.

HQE Systems, Inc. | A California Minority Owned, Disabled Veteran Business Advanced Providing Life Saving Technology.

SAFE Units are compact, easy-to-install devices designed to provide emergency alerts and critical information directly to residents’ homes. These units serve as a vital link in the communication chain, ensuring that even during widespread outages or disasters, households remain informed and connected to city leadership and emergency services.
● MSRP Per Unit: $142.95 (excluding shipping, handling, and tax) ● At-Cost Price Per Unit: $92.84 (excluding shipping, handling, and tax) ● Potential Savings for the Community: $105,231.00 (if all 2100 units are purchased) These units empower families with vital communication tools during emergencies, ensuring no household is left unprotected.

Total Grant Value
The Community SAFE Grant delivers a total value of over $135,000.00 in public safety enhancements:
● $30,000 SAFE Network System at no cost.
● $ 105,231.00 in discounts for Indoor SAFE Units for residents.

Why HQE Selected Rolling Hills
HQE Systems’ mission is deeply rooted in supporting communities that support veterans. Rolling Hills’ leadership and residents have continually demonstrated an exceptional commitment to HQE Systems and our veteran workforce. Your city’s values align with our vision to create safer, more resilient communities. By awarding the Community SAFE Grant to Rolling Hills, we are not only expressing our gratitude but also investing in the safety and well-being of a community that inspires us.

Our Commitment to Your Community
As a veteran-owned company, HQE Systems believes in going beyond business to make a meaningful impact. The Community SAFE Grant is a testament to this belief. We are excited to see how this partnership will enhance public safety in Rolling Hills and set a precedent for community resilience.

Thank you for the opportunity to serve your community. We look forward to working together to implement these life-saving technologies.

Very Respectfully,
Qais Alkurdi
CEO, HQE Systems, Inc.

Disabled - Retired Veteran
HQE Systems, Inc. | A California Minority Owned, Disabled Veteran Business Advanced Providing Life Saving Technology.

Item: 8.G.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Samantha Crew, Management Analyst
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Consider and approve the Planned Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Safe, Clean Water (Measure W) Municipal Program Funds for submission to Los Angeles County Flood Control District
Background:

In 2018, Los Angeles County voters approved Measure W, a tax measure that helps improve water quality and build up the county’s water self-sufficiency. Funding is provided through a parcel tax of 2.5 cents per square foot of impermeable land area (building, concrete, etc.) in the district. The measure provides cities, watershed areas, and Los Angeles County with the funds to capture, treat, and recycle storm water through the Safe, Clean Water Regional and Municipal Programs.

The LA County Flood Control District administers the program, distributes funds, provides staff support, and oversees capacity-building programs. Cities receive funding through the Municipal Program proportional to the revenues generated within their boundaries. The funds provide local agencies with the opportunity to identify programs that will best address stormwater and urban runoff within their jurisdictions.

Measure W funding can be used for eligible activities such as project development, design, construction, effectiveness monitoring, operations, maintenance, and other programs and studies related to protecting and improving water quality in lakes, rivers, and the ocean. To receive funds, cities must submit an expenditure plan to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District annually detailing the planned use of Safe Clean Water Municipal Program funds.

Discussion:

It is projected that the City will receive approximately $105,000 in Municipal Safe Clean Water Program Funds (Measure W) in December 2026 for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The Safe Clean Water Municipal Program planned expenditures spreadsheet (Attachment A) shows the estimated carryover amount from prior years available to spend in the amount of $60,200, this figure is tentative since expenditures for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 are not yet final until June 30 or later. Thus, it is estimated that in total the City will have approximately $148,700 in Municipal Safe Clean Water funds available to spend in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The City must spend at least 70% of its Municipal Program Funds on eligible expenses related to “new” projects or programs initiated after November 2018. Up to 30%

of a City’s Municipal Program Funds may be used to pay for eligible costs and expenses related to the continuation of programs initiated prior to November 2018. Program funds are allocated as described in the attached expenditure budget spreadsheet.The FY2026-2027 Safe Clean Water Municipal Program planned expenditures spreadsheet shows the proposed budget for the expenditure of its available Measure W funds. The budget includes a 10% safety factor. The assumptions made in these budget estimates are explained in the “Source” and “Explanation” columns for each item.

The City's share of Peninsula Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) implementation is the largest expenditure in the plan with an estimated total cost of $66,200. This cost has historically been split between the Safe, Clean Water fund and the General fund to ensure adherence to the rule that no more than 30% of Safe, Clean Water expenditures can be used for "ongoing" activities initiated prior to November 2018 vs “new” effort initiated since November 2018. Recently, the City received a policy decision from LA County staff that municipalities can recover CIMP costs as "new" effort under the Safe, Clean Water (Measure W) Program once these monitoring programs have been updated and approved to meet the 2021 stormwater permit requirements. This decision means that the City’s full share of CIMP costs in FY2026/2027 along with the City’s share of the Harbor Toxics TMDL monitoring costs, which are an element of the CIMP, are eligible to be charged to Measure W to the extent funds are available in the City’s Measure W account.

Fiscal Impact:

The City will receive approximately $105,000 in Municipal Program Funds for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and an estimated $60,200 in carryover from prior fiscal years. Planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2026-2027, as outlined in Attachment A, are $145,700.

Recommendation:

Approve as presented.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - PW_STW_SCW_260309_2026-27_SCW_Budget

Item Description
Estimated Cost to be
Recovered by Safe,
Clean Water
Source Explanation
1 City Share of Peninsula Coordinated Integrated
Monitoring Program (CIMP)
$ 66,200 City's maximum cost under CIMP MOU Amendment 2 ($66,146 ), rounded up to nearest $100.

Per email from LA County, updated CIMP monitoring efforts implemented under the 2021 Stormwater Permit are eligible in the 70% new effort column. 2 City Share of Harbor Toxics TMDL monitoring
$ 18,000
City's maximum share of cost for Harbor Toxics TMDL monitoring effort from the revised Harbor Toxics TMDL. Assume 58% of costs are "ongoing" in 30% category and 42% costs in "new" 70% category.

New monitoring requirements stemming from the revised Harbor Toxics TMDL can be considered "new" effort in the 70% category since they were not required prior to November 2018.

Implementation of ongoing monitoring tasks still needs to be tracked as an "ongoing" cost in the 30% category.
3 Sepulveda Canyon Flow Monitoring $ 19,300 Cost based on NV5 FY2026-27 through 2027-28 Professional Services Agreement - Authorized amount per contract for FY26-27 was 17,406.90 for flow monitoring plus 1/2 of total project management and coordination cost of $3810.

Sepulveda Canyon monitoring is newly required by LA Water Board as a condition of City joining the Peninsula WMP via 85%, 24-hr runoff retention deemed compliance. Since this is a new effort not required prior to November 2018, it is in the 70% new effort category. 4 Enhanced Sediment Source Control & Brush
Clearance Enforcement
$ 17,100 20% of newly hired Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician salary for additional oversight of construction sites and brush clearance ordinance. Salary assuned to be $85,582 based on 5/12/25 Council Staff Report on Proposed Employeee Salary Schedule and Job Classification Modifications.

New effort implemented after November 2018 to address storm-borne sediment TMDL pollutants associated with insufficiently controlled construction sites and brush clearance to prevent wildfires and associated TMDL toxic pollutants.
5 SCW Municipal Program Planning and Reporting $ 11,400 McGowan Task 2.2 - Consultant assistance with SCW planning and reporting
Eligible in the 70% category as a new effort since it is required by the SCW program. 6 Watershed Management Program Adaptive
Management & Progress Reporting
$ 6,200 McGowan budget for Tasks 8.1. & 8.3 per FY2026-27 MS4 Consulting Scope of Work
City's participation in watershed progress reporting and watershed management program as a result of joining the Peninsula EWMP is a new effort since November 2018 implemented to comply with the 2021 Stormwater Permit and joining the WMP. 7 Development & Implementation of Community
Outreach/Engagement
$ 7,500 McGowan budget for Tasks 8.2 and 2.1 plus Other Direct Costs invoiced by McGowan for website hosting by SBCCOG and graphic design services per FY2026-27 MS4 Consulting Scope of
Work.

Effort to develop new outreach materials and methods and tracking of metrics on outreach and engagement as required by 2021 Stormwater Permit.
$ 145,700 Check: total planned expenditures are less than the estimated total SCW Municipal funds aailable to spend in FY2026-27 as show below.
$ 60,200 Uncertain depending on how final FY2025-26 expenditures come in $ 105,000
Note that SCW website references prior fiscal year because it is the year they collect the taxes even though not disbursed to City until midway through the following year. $ 148,700
PLANNED EXPENDITURES FOR FY2026-2027 SAFE CLEAN WATER MUNICIPAL PROGRAM (Measure W) Expenditures
Estimated carryover of unspent funds from previous years Estimated Measure W disbursement to be received in December 2026 from LACFCD Total SCW Municipal Funds Available to Spend less 10% for safety factor

Item: 8.H.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Emma Montes, Assistant Planner
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Receive and file the Annual Progress Reports for the General Plan and Housing Element
Background:

The annual progress reports (APRs) for the General Plan and Housing Element are due on April 1, 2026. Government Code Section 65400 and 65700 mandates that all cities and counties submit an annual report on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation to their legislative bodies, the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), and the Housing and Community Development (HCD). Government Code section 65400 also requires that each city, county, or city and county, including charter cities, prepare an APR on the status of the housing element of its general plan and progress in its implementation, using forms and definitions adopted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

The APRs provide local legislative bodies and the public with information regarding the implementation of the General Plan for their city or county. APRs also inform the public of the progress in meeting the community’s goals. APRs must be presented to the local legislative body for its review and acceptance, usually as a consent or discussion item on a regular meeting agenda.

Discussion:

The General Plan APR provides an overview of recent updates to elements and how the City complies with LCI's guidelines. It summarizes the actions related to the General Plan over the past year, including adopted ordinances and resolutions. It also summarizes the City's efforts in updating the Housing Element and Safety Element. The Housing Element APR is provided on a spreadsheet prepared by HCD. Activity in the City over the past year includes the submittal of two accessory dwelling unit (ADU) applications and the issuance of one building permit for a new single-family residence and ADU at 35 Chuckwagon Road and an ADU at 9 Portuguese Bend Road. The new residence is reported as an above moderate-income unit, while the ADU is reported as being a deedrestricted moderate-income unit.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Receive and file.

Attachments:

1. PL_GPN_260303_APR_2025_RollingHillsGeneralPlan_APRLetter_D

2. PL_GPN_260309_APR_2025_HousingElement_Report_Spreadsheets

INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
March 9, 2026
Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
SUBJECT: ROLLING HILLS’ 2025 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Dear Sir or Madam:

This serves as the City of Rolling Hills’ 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP APR) to the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI).

The Rolling Hills General Plan was last updated in its entirety on June 25, 1990. Its purpose is to comply with State law in guiding the physical development of the City; provide a long-range plan for future development in the City, which is sensitive to existing development patterns; and represents the desires of the community through an extensive public outreach process. The Rolling Hills General Plan includes the following elements:
• Land Use Element (Amended February 8, 2021)
• Housing Element (6th Cycle adopted September 26, 2022; certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on November, 23, 2022) • Circulation Element
• Open Space/Conservation Element
• Safety Element (Revised update adopted October 24, 2022) • Noise Element
Compliance
The Rolling Hills General Plan complies with LCI’s General Plan Guidelines. The following is a summary of actions related to the General Plan and updated Municipal Code sections over the past year:
• Moratoriums: The City currently has no moratoriums related to the General Plan. • Accessory Dwelling Units: On December 9, 2025, Ordinance No. 388 was adopted to amend Chapter 17.28 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) to comply with recent changes to state law that impose new limits on local authority to regulate Accessory

Dwelling Units (“ADUs”) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (“JADUs”), among other things, AB 462 (Coastal Development Permits; Disaster-Affected Areas), AB 1154 (JADU Owner-Occupancy; Short-Term Rental), SB 9; SB 543 (ADU Ordinance Submittal to HCD; Approval), SB 543 (ADU Size; Number of ADUs; Impact Fees; Application Timeline):

AB 462 – Coastal Development Permits; Disaster-Affected Areas AB 462 modifies several permitting requirements associated with processing Coastal Development Permits for ADUs located in the Coastal Zone. Beyond changes to CDP processing, AB 462 modifies the rules governing the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (CofO) for an ADU. Historically, state law has prohibited a local agency from issuing a CofO for an ADU before one is issued for the primary dwelling (i.e., the primary dwelling must have a CofO before the ADU can receive one).

AB 462 creates a narrow exception to this prohibition for detached ADUs when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the Governor has declared a state of emergency for the county on or after February 1, 2025; (2) the primary dwelling was substantially damaged or destroyed by an event referenced in the state of emergency proclamation; and (3) the ADU has been issued construction permits and passed all required inspections. (Gov. Code, § 66328(b).) If these conditions are satisfied, the detached ADU can receive a CofO before the primary dwelling. In all other scenarios, the primary dwelling still needs a CofO before one can be issued for an ADU.

AB 462 was enacted as an urgency measure that took effect immediately when signed by the Governor (on October 10, 2025).

The following three bills were enacted as non-urgency measures and take effect on January 1, 2026.

AB 1154 – JADU Owner-Occupancy; Short-Term Rental
When a JADU is developed, existing state law requires a property owner to reside in the JADU or remaining portion of the single-family dwelling. AB 1154 narrows this requirement to now only apply when a JADU shares sanitation facilities (bathroom) with the single-family dwelling.

If the JADU has its own bathroom, then the property owner does not have to reside on the property at all. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(b).)
AB 1154 also expressly prohibits JADUs from being used as short-term rentals (i.e., rented for a term shorter than 30 days). (See amended Gov. Code, § 66333(g).) The City’s ADU ordinance already included this prohibition (as well as prohibiting ADUs from being used as short-term rentals). But now it’s required by state law.

SB 9; SB 543 – ADU Ordinance Submittal to HCD; Approval Under existing law, local agencies are required to submit a copy of their ADU ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) within 60 days of adoption. This year’s SB 9[1] and SB 543 create a penalty for failing to do so by rendering null and void any local ordinance that is not submitted to HCD within 60 days of adoption. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66326(d); new Gov. Code, § 66333.5(d).) The bills further specify that a local ADU ordinance is null and void if HCD issues findings that the ordinance does not comply with state law and the local agency fails to respond to HCD within 30 days.

(Id.)
SB 543 – ADU Size; Number of ADUs; Impact Fees; Application Timeline SB 543 makes numerous changes and clarifications to state ADU law, the most notable of which are summarized below.

ADU & JADU Size
Existing law limits the maximum size of a JADU to 500 square feet and prohibits local ADU ordinances from imposing certain development standards that would prevent an ADU created under Government Code section 66314 through 66322 from being at least 800 square feet.

SB 543 amends state ADU law to specify that allowable square footage of an ADU or JADU refers to square footage of “interior livable space.” (See amended Gov. Code, § 66313(d), 66321(b)(2).)
Impact Fees
Existing law exempts ADUS that are 750 square feet or smaller from development impacts fees (DIFs).

SB 543 clarifies that DIFs may not be imposed on an ADU that has 750 or fewer square feet of interior livable space or on a JADU with 500 or fewer square feet of interior livable space.

The bill also exempts an ADU or JADU with fewer than 500 square feet of interior livable space from school impact fees. (See amended Gov. Code, § 66311.5.) Quantity of ADUs Created Under Government Code Section 66323 Existing state law creates four categories of ADUs that must be approved if they comply with the limited standards provided in Government Code section 66323(a)(1)–(4). These are:

1. A converted ADU and JADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing singlefamily dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(1));

2. A detached ADU created on a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(2));

3. Converted ADUs created in an existing multifamily dwelling (Gov. Code, § 66323(a)(3)); and

4. Detached ADUs created on a lot with a proposed or existing multifamily dwelling.

For some time, there has been uncertainty as to whether ADUs created under Government Code section 66323 could be combined. Some practitioners interpreted the statute to not require local agencies to allow combinations. Initially, HCD took the same position, in its 2020 ADU Handbook. But for the last few years, HCD has taken the opposite position: that yes, combinations are permitted. (See HCD January 2025 ADU Handbook, at p. 19 [“[P]ursuant to Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a), local governments must allow units created pursuant to subparagraphs (1) and (2) together or (3) and (4) together”].) SB 543 codifies HCD’s most recent interpretation by amending Government Code section 66323 to specifically allow combinations. Thus, a lot with a multifamily dwelling can now have a converted ADU or ADUs created under section 66323(a)(3) and detached ADUs created under section 66323(a)(4). And a lot with a single family dwelling can now have a converted ADU and a JADU created under section 66323(a)(1) and a detached ADU created under section 66323(a)(2).

ADU Permitting Process
Existing law has long required local agencies to approve or deny an ADU application within 60 days of receiving a complete application. However, state law was silent with respect to incompleteness determinations, subsequent resubmittals, and appealing local decisions on ADU applications.

SB 543 requires local agencies to now:

1. Determine whether an ADU application is complete within 15 business days of submittal;

2. If the application is incomplete, within the same 15 days provide the applicant with a list of incomplete items and how to address them;

3. Review a resubmitted application for completeness within 15 business days;

4. Provide the applicant with a written appeal process for any incompleteness determination or denial (to the Planning Commission or City Council, or both); and

5. Provide a final written determination on the appeal within 60 business days of receiving the appeal). (See amended Gov. Code, §§ 66317 [ADUs], 66335 [JADUs].) Housing Element
As mentioned earlier, the City adopted its 6th Cycle Housing Element on September 26, 2022.

The Housing Element was found to be in full compliance with State law by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on November, 23, 2022. A separate annual progress report is prepared for the City’s Housing Element.

The housing allocation for Rolling Hills for the Sixth Cycle 2021-2029 period is 45 units, including:
• 20 very low-income units
• 9 low-income units
• 11 moderate-income units
• 5 above moderate-income units
Each City must plan for the type of housing it has been assigned. In the case of very low- and low-income units, this typically requires sites that are zoned for multi-family housing. Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) may be counted as low- and moderate-income units if the City has sufficient data on rents and construction trends to support its conclusions.

The Housing Element provides data supporting the finding that at least 13 of the future ADUs will be affordable to lower income households based on data from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), the City’s 2020 ADU resident survey, and local real estate ads. The forecast of five ADUs per year is based on the City’s track record of approving nine ADUs in 2021 alone.

Conclusion

This GP APR was presented to the City Council at its regularly scheduled meeting on March 9, 2026. The General Plan, ordinances, and other documents described in this letter are available on the City’s website or at City Hall.

Thank you for your consideration to this matter. The City is eager to remain in compliance with regulatory orders and in good standing with State agencies. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, please feel free to contact me at 310-377-1521 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,
Emma Montes
Assistant Planner

Jurisdiction Rolling Hills
Reporting Year 2025
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Year
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 0
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
Deed
Restricted 1
Non-Deed
Restricted 0
0 1
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 3 0 0
2 to 4 units per structure 0 0 0
5+ units per structure 0 0 0
Accessory Dwelling Unit 0 1 0
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 3 1 0
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 0 0
1 1
Extremely Low
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Acutely Low
Data is auto-populated based on data entered in Tables A, A2, C, and D (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level

6 6
3 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Acutely Low 0 0 0
Extremely Low 0 0 0
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 0 0
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 0 0
AB 2011 (2022) 0 0
SB 6 (2022) 0 0
SB 423 (2023) 0 0
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications # of Units
Ministerial 4 4
Discretionary 2 2
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0
Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Use of SB 423 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications Approved
Units Constructed - SB 423 Streamlining Permits
Total Housing Units Approved:

Housing Applications Summary
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Jurisdiction Rolling Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Planning
Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Historic Sites Application
Status Project Type Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Acutely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Acutely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Extremely
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total

PROPOSED
Units by
Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by
project
Total

DISAPPROVE
D Units by
Project
Please select
state
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.

Is this project
located on a
site with an
associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government
Code Section
65400(a)(2)(N)
and reported on
Table L?
Did the
housing
development
application
seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915?
Were
incentives or
concessions
requested
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915
approved?
Please
indicate the
status of the
application.

Is the project
considered a
ministerial
project or
discretionary
project?
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 6 3 0 7567006036 23 Chuckwagon
Road 21-01
ADU R
6/2/2022
1 1 1 0 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial
7569004002 35 Saddleback
Road 25-007
ADU R
1/13/2025
1 1 1 0 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial
7567017019 2 Quail Ridge
Road South 25-052 ADU R
4/22/2025
1 1 1 0 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial
7567015037 1 Georgeff
Road 25-029 ADU R
12/18/2025
1 1 1 0 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial
7569-013-022 12 Pine Tree
Lane 25-063 SFD O
6/2/2025
1 1 0 0 NONE No No No Pending Discretionary
7569-004-012 2 Hillside Lane 25-006 ADU R 1/10/2025 1 1 0 0 NONE No No No Pending Ministerial 7569-002-017
10 Saddleback
Road 25-101
SFD O
9/3/2025
1 1 0 0 NONE No No No Approved Discretionary
1 5 11
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bonus Law Applications

Jurisdiction Rolling Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting
Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning
Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
Table
A2
2 3 5 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project
Name+
Local
Jurisdic
tion
Trackin
g ID
Unit
Categor
y
(SFA,SF
D,2 to
4,5+,AD
U,MH)
Tenure
R=Rent
er
O=Own
er
Acutely
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Acutely
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Above
Moderat
eIncome
Entitlement
Date
Approved
# of
Units
issued
Entitle
ments
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 1 3 3
7567015037 1 Georgeff Road 25-029 SFD O 1 7/24/2025 1
7569-005-008 80 Saddleback Road 24-162 SFD O 1 10/28/2025 1 7569-002-017 10 Saddleback Road 25-101 SFD O 1 2/12/2025 1 7567001004 23 Chuckwagon Road 21-01 ADU R 1 1
8 9
Acutely
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Acutely
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Above
Moderat
eIncome
Building
Permits
Date Issued
# of
Units
Issued
Buildin
g
Permits
1 1
0 0
0 1 1/16/2025 1
11 12
Acutely
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Acutely
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Extrem
ely LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Very
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
LowIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Deed
Restrict
ed
Moderat
eIncome
Non
Deed
Restrict
ed
Above
Moderat
eIncome
Certificates
of
Occupancy
or other
forms of
readiness
(see
instructions)
Date Issued
# of
Units
issued
Certific
ates of
Occupa
ncy or
other
forms
of
readine
ss
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project Identifier Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits
7 Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 10 1 4

Streamlining Historic Sites Infill
Housing without
Financial Assistance
or Deed Restrictions
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
Notes
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Please select
the state
streamlining
provision the
project was

APPROVED
pursuant to.
(may select
multiple)
Is this project
located on a
site with an
associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government
Code Section
65400(a)(2)(N)
and reported
on Table L?
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance
Programs for Each
Development
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable
without financial
assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how
the locality determined
the units were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of
Affordability or
Deed Restriction
(years) (if affordable
in perpetuity enter
1000)+
Number
of
Demolis
hed/Des
troyed
Units
Demolis
hed or
Destroy
ed Units
Demolis
hed/Des
troyed
Units
Owner
or
Renter
Total Density
Bonus Applied
to the Project
(Percentage
Increase in Total
Allowable Units
or Total
Maximum
Allowable
Residential
Gross Floor
Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions,
Waivers, or Other
Modifications
Given to the
Project (Excluding
Parking Waivers
or Parking
Reductions)
List the
incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding
Parking
Waivers or
Parking
Modifications
)
Did the
project
receive
a
reductio
n or
waiver
of
parking
standar
ds?
(Y/N)
Notes+
2 NONE No N 1 Demolishe
d O
NONE No N
NONE No N 1 Demolishe
d O
NONE No N
Housing with Financial
Assistance and/or Deed
Restrictions
Demolished/Destroyed
Units Density Bonus
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Table A2

Jurisdiction Rolling Hills ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 10/15/2021 - 10/15/2029
1 Projection
Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
06/30/2021-
10/14/2021
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Total Units
to Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by
Income Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - 1 - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - 1 - 1 - - - - - -
Above Moderate 5 - - - 3 3 - - - - - 6 -
45 - 1 - 4 3 1 - - - - 9 37
Extremely Low - - -
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
2 Income Level
Acutely Low - - -
Total Units
Very Low 20 - 20
Low 9 - 9
Moderate 11 3 8
Total RHNA
*For years prior to 2025, Acutely Low-Income units are reported within the Extremely Low-Income category *For jurisdictions that received RHNA determinations for the current cycle prior to the passage of AB 3093 (September 19, 2024):
- You were not allocated Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income RHNA targets, therefore the allocations in Field 1 are listed as "0" - If you wish to set your own targets in these income categories for informational purposes, contact HCD staff at [email protected]. - All Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income units reported during the cycle are counted towards Very-Low Income RHNA progress *For years prior to 2025, data on deed-restricted vs. non-deed restricted Extremely Low-Income units is approximated from whether the projects reported any deed-restricted Very Low-Income Units. If you wish to edit this historical data for accuracy or have any questions about the data, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected].

Please Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data.

Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected].

Jurisdiction Rolling Hills
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective Projected Completion Date in
Housing Element
Applicable
Cycle
Status of Program
Implementation Program Implementation Details
Quantified
Outcomes:

Category
Quantified
Outcomes:

Count
Supporting
Documents
Program 1: Annual Progress
Report
City will prepare and file an annual report
on the progress made toward implementing
its Housing Element using forms and
definitions adopted by the California
Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD).
6th Cycle Continuous
City has filed 2025 APR and is preparing
2026 APR. City will continue to file APR
by April 1 of each year.

Program 2: Rancho Del Mar
(RDM) Opportunity Site
Monitoring
(1) 16 units of affordable housing on the
RDM site (excludes density bonus,
addressed in Program 3)
(2) Annual meeting between the City
Manager and School Superintendent
6th Cycle In Progress
(1) Meeting with School Superintendent
by end of 2022 and once annually
thereafter - continous
(2) Preparation of site “fact sheet” for
review by School District and School
Board by June 2023 - in progress
(3) Subdivision creating “western”
parcel by end next housing cycle and in
consultation with School Superintendent
and Board approval
Meetings 5
Program 3: No Net Loss
Monitoring and Other MultiFamily Housing Opportunities (1) No net loss of housing capacity to meet
RHNA at all times
(2) Provide an 80% density bonus on the
Rancho Del Mar site, enabling 29 units of
new affordable housing instead of the 16
allowed by the base zoning.

Continuous through 2029 6th Cycle Continuous
Program 4: Add Definitions of
Transitional and Supportive
Housing, Residential Care
Facilities, and Employee
Housing to Municipal Code
Create local housing opportunities for at
least six households employed in Rolling
Hills (and currently living outside the city)
during the planning period.
6th Cycle Continuous
(1) Ordinance revisions completed in
August 2022
(2) Opportunities for at least six
individuals working in Rolling Hills and
living elsewhere to reside in the
community (in ADUs, guest houses,
affordable units on the Rancho Del Mar
site, etc.) by 2029
Households 2
Program 5: Density Bonus
Ordinance
Application of density bonus to future
affordable rental housing on RDM site (up
to 13 additional units, assuming 100%
affordable project on the site)
Ordinance adopted in 2022 6th Cycle Completed
Ordinance revisions completed in 2022;
metric objectives contiuous through
2029
Program 6: Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU)
Producction, Monitoring, and
Incentives
Develop citywide ADU registry; annual ADU
survey and monitoring; develop inventory
of potential ADUs; incentives for ADU
construction; pre-approved ADU plans;
coordination with Community Association
(RHCA), septic tank replacement grants or
financial assistance; non-profit
construction of ADUs; monitor best
practices in ADUs; update Municipal Code
provisions for ADUs; outreach to ADU
permit recipients
(1) Citywide ADU registry of 40 ADUs by
2029, including at least 18 ADUs rented at
levels meeting affordability criteria for
lower income households
(2) ADU Survey, administered once a year
(3) Inventory of potential ADUs
(4) ADU Incentives
(5) Two to four pre-approved ADU
architectural plans
(6) Municipal Code Revisions (see 6.10
above) -- Completed
(7) 100% completion of ADUs receiving
permits
(8) Seven ADUs/guest houses constructed
by non-profits by 2029 (see 6.8 above and
Program 9 below)
6th Cycle Continuous
(1) Rosters and Surveys prepared by
2022 and updated annually
(2) ADU incentives by 2023
(3) Approved architectural plans by 2024,
or as funding allows
(4) Amend Municipal Code Chapter 17.28
(Accessory Dwelling Units) for
consistency with State law by August
2022 (this action has been completed)
(5) Establish protocol for 6-month checkins with ADU permit recipients by January 1, 2023
(6) Annual monitoring report on ADU
production
Program 7: ADU Outreach,
Education, Information
(1) Outreach mailer to 639 households (at
least once every 2 years)
(2) Creation of 40 new ADUs by 2029 (5 per
year)
(1) First mailing by March 2023
(2) Website update by June 2023
(3) Update of design guidelines by
2024
6th Cycle Continuous
All residents were notified of ADU
survey in September 2022 and ADU
Ordinance Amendment in December
2022 via City newsletter. Website
continuously updated. Design guidelines
handled by Rolling Hills Community
Association (RHCA); City's Ordinance
adheres to State requirements and is
compatible with RHCA.

Program 8: Assist Senior and
Disabled Households
Website landing page with senior housing
resources; Facilitate age-in-place retrofits
for 10 senior households; City Council
study session on needs of seniors and
potential actions to assist Rolling Hills
seniors
June 2023 (for website); Council
Study Session before 12/23 6th Cycle Continuous
City uses newsletter and local
organizations to disseminate
information. Council and staff inform
seniors individually and at meetings on
assistance opportunities.

Program 9: Assist Extremely
Low-Income Households
Provide seven housing units affordable to
Extremely Low Income
Prepare inventory of Extremely Low
Income (ELI) units by 2024, update
annually; Facilitate housing
assistance to at least 7 ELI
homeowners by 2029
6th Cycle Continuous No ELI units received in 2023
Program 10: Support Regional
Efforts to End Homelessness
Participation in point in time surveys;
participation in at least one regional
meeting annually on strategies to end
homelessness
Ongoing, 2021-2029 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous through 2029 Program 11: Permit
Streamlining
Compliance with all provisions of the
Permit Streamlining Act Ongoing, 2021-2029 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous through 2029

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583 Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Program 12: Facilitate
Communication with
Affordable Housing Service
Providers, Developers, and
Advocates
Hold at least one meeting a year with one or
more non-profit housing sponsors to
discuss housing opportunities and needs in
Rolling Hills; See also Programs 8, 13, and
15 Convene one meeting before
December 2022. Convene additional
meetings at least once a year from
2023 to 2029
6th Cycle Continuous Continuous through 2029
Program 13: Home Sharing
Continue to provide informational
brochures advertising shared housing
programs at City Hall and on the City’s
website; at least eight non-resident
households participating in a non-profit
managed home sharing program enabling
them to reside in Rolling Hills by 2029
6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing
Program 14: Sewer Feasibility
Studies and Phase One
Construction
(1) Complete 1,585-foot sanitary sewer
extension to City Hall/ Tennis Courts
(Phase I); (2) Complete feasibility / cost
study of sanitary sewer extension; (3)
Obtain grants for Phase I project
construction; (4) Updated “Will Serve”
letter from the Los Angeles County
Sanitation District, indicating ability to
accept effluent from 235 existing homes
upon completion of future phase sewer
system
6th Cycle Continuous
City Council has had numerous
meetings on improvements to the City
Hall campus and sewer feasibility. In
January 2023, Council directed staff to
phase the sewer main project to include
a new 8" sewer line in Phase I and for
staff to seek grant funding opportunities
for construction. Projects to upgrade the
tennis courts, City Hall, and parking lot
area are proceeding. The City updates
residents in its newsletter and at public
meetings. The City received a $1,000,000
Community Funding grant via
Congressman Ted Lieu and is currently
working with USDA regarding said grant.

Phase 1 construction and costs are yet
to be determined.

Program 15 Pursue Grants for
Minor Home Repair Program
Minor home repair/ age-in-place/ septic tank
replacement assistance to at least ten
lower-income or senior Rolling Hills
households
By 2023, and every two years
thereafter 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing
Program 16: Code
Enforcement
Respond to 100 percent of resident Code
Enforcement inquiries Ongoing, 2021-2029 6th Cycle Continuous The City has a contract for code
enforcement services and follows up on
code enforcement inquiries and reports
from residents.

Program 17: Reduce Home
Energy Costs
(1) Provide links on City website related to
energy conservation, weatherization, and
financial assistance (2) Adopt updated
Building Code standards for energy
efficiency
6th Cycle Continuous
Website updates continuous; Building
Code and Fire Code updates completed
in 2023
Program 18: Facilitate New
Construction and Home
Improvements
5 new single family homes (above
moderate income)
Objective covers the period from
2021 through 2029 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing
Program 19: Remediate
Geologic Hazards
Geologic studies for new development and
major grading permits On-going, 2021 to 2029 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing Program 20: Fair Housing
Services Program
Administration
At least five households assisted 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing Program 21: Fair Housing
Outreach and Affirmative
Marketing
(1) At least 50% of future occupants of
affordable housing created on the RDMO
site are from outside Rolling Hills.
(2) At least 50% of future ADU occupants
are from outside Rolling Hills (to be
measured through the ADU survey
described in Program 6.2)
Ongoing, 2021-2029. Website
update by December 2022 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing
Program 22: Fair Housing
Training for Staff
(1) At least one Rolling Hills staff member
participates in on-line Fair Housing training
each year through 2029
(2) At least one presentation on fair housing
is delivered to the City Council in a noticed
public hearing, attended by at least 10
residents
6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing
Program 23: Written
Procedures for SB 35 Projects
Posted information on SB 35, including
application form Complete by December 31, 2022 6th Cycle Completed Information provided on City's website linking to SCAG's resources.

Program 24: Updating of
Linked Files on Planning and
Community Services
Department Landing Page
Reorganized and updated Planning and
Community Services Department website 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective Projected Completion Date in
Housing Element
Applicable
Cycle
Status of Program
Implementation Program Implementation Details
Quantified
Outcomes:

Quantified
Outcomes: Supporting
Documents
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Item: 10.A.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Emma Montes, Assistant Planner
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Receive and file Zoning Case No. 25-091: Site plan review for new construction, nonexempt grading and related improvements; variances for an attached garage within the side yard areas, and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for location at 3 Maverick Lane (Karatsu) (Lot 30-SK) Background:

Applicant Request
On August 8, 2025, an application was duly filed by Louie Tomaro, agent for Michael and Jane Karatsu, requesting approval of the following proposed improvements (collectively referred to as the “Project”):
• 2,510 square-foot, one-story, single-family residence; • 502 square-foot, two-car, attached garage;
In addition to the above structures, the Project also includes a path for future stable access, hardscape, landscaping, and other related site work improvements. Additional features, such as a service yard and other hardscape elements, are proposed but are not subject to discretionary review.

Zoning, Location, and Lot Description
The property is a rectangular-shaped parcel zoned RAS-2, located just east of Caballeros Road with frontage on Maverick Lane. The rear of the property also abuts the Upper Willow Spring trail. The lot size is 91,708 square feet net (2.11 acres) and includes a 20-foot-wide roadway easement along Maverick Lane.

There is one building pad measuring 4,510 square feet which contains the existing house (2,950 sq.ft.), garage (480 sq.ft.), and pool/spa (130 sq.ft.). The parcel width is 150 feet across, as per RAS2 zoning code minimum. The topography of the land is such that the building pad is set on the western front 10% of the parcel area due to a steep slope behind the existing residence, making much of the rear of the property unusable for development. These topographical characteristics are consistent with other parcels in the area, which follow similar patterns of lot development as the existing and proposed residence.

Previous Projects
None.

Planning Commission Approval January 27, 2026
On January 27, 2026, the Planning Commission held a morning field trip at the subject property, with four commissioners present, as well as Kathryn Bishop from the Rolling Hills Community Association and resident Leah Mirsch (4 Cinchring Road). The applicant's team was in attendance to view the plans. No major concerns were reported and the field trip proceeded to the public hearing meeting later that evening at City Hall. All Commissioners were present. During the evening public hearing, staff presented the project. The applicants' architect and engineer attended the evening meeting, and no members of the public were present. After review and discussion, the Commission voted unanimously (5-0) to approve the project and adopted Resolution number 2026-01 (Attachment D).

Discussion:

Site Plan Review
Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (“RHMC”) Section 17.46.020. The applicant is proposing a new residence and garage, resulting in approximately 3,012 square feet of total floor area. The Project also includes the proposed stable and corral set aside areas of 1,000 square feet total, alongside an access path set aside area located on the north side of the property leading to the proposed set aside area. The applicant has proposed three retaining walls along the west and south sides of the residence, with a maximum height of 4 feet tall from the finished grade. The proposed grading for the residence is 98 cubic yards of excavation and 98 cubic yards of fill, with a total of 196 cubic yards to be balanced on site. The plans for this project can be found in Attachment E.

Variances
The Applicant is requesting to construct the attached garage 25 feet within the side yard setback line.

RHMC Section 17.16.110 requires at least a 50-foot front yard setback, and RHMC Section

17.16.120(B) requires a 35’ side yard setback from the property line for any structures in RAS-2.

Given the limited buildable area and limited width of the parcel, a Variance is warranted.

MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE
Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage
The Project complies with the remainder of the Development Standards in the RHMC. The existing structural lot coverage is 4,095 square feet (4.5%), and the project proposes a net addition of 344 square feet (0.4%) for a total of 4,439 square feet (4.9%) structural lot coverage. This is well below the maximum allowed 20% structural coverage. The existing flatwork coverage is 4,155 square feet (4.5%). The flatwork onsite will be reduced by 1,413 square feet (-1.5%) upon approval of the structure and the new reduced flatwork area will be 2,742 square feet (3.0%). The maximum allowable is 15% flatwork coverage. See the “Development Table” attachment for further details.

Finally, the total overall structural and flatwork coverage will result in 7,184 square feet or 7.9%, which is within the 35% structural and flatwork coverage guideline. The existing building pad coverage is 4,095 square feet (46.1%), and the project proposes a net reduction of 1,048 square feet (-11.8%) for a total of 3,047 square feet (34.3%) building pad coverage. This is above the guideline maximum allowed 30% building pad coverage. The development table can be found in Attachment C.

Staff has included a radius map (Attachment A) and a vicinity map (Attachment B).

Public Comments

There have been no responses to the public hearing notices mailed to residents within a 1,000 ft radius from the development on January 16, 2026.

Review by RHCA
The Rolling Hills Community Association reviewed and conceptually approved the attached garage and residence plans in November 2025, subject to City approval.

Environmental Review
The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Receive and file.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - PL_ADR_3MaverickLn_ZC25-091_CC_Radius Map_260309

2. Attachment B - PL_ADR_3MaverickLn_ZC25-091_CC_Vicinity Map_260309

3. Attachment C - PL_ADR_260116_3MaverickLn_ZC25-091_DevelopmentTable_F

4. Attachment D - 2026-01_PC_Resolution_3MaverickLn_ZC25-091_F_E

5. Attachment E - PL_ADR_251215_3MaverickLn_ZC25-091_Plans_Revised

City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
TITLE RADIUS MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 25-091
Site Plan Review, Variance
OWNER Karatsu
ADDRESS 3 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills 90274 SITE

City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 25-091
Site Plan Review, Variance
OWNER Karatsu
ADDRESS 3 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills 90274

Development Table
Zoning Case No. 25-112
3 MAVERICK LANE

EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
RA-S- 2 Zone SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE,
POOL

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE
Net Lot Area 91,708 SF 0 SF 91,708 SF
Residence 2,950 SF -440 SF 2,510 SF
Garage 480 SF 22 SF 502 SF
Swimming Pools/Spa 130 SF -130 SF 0 SF
Stable setaside
(Min. 450 SF) 0 SF 450 SF 450 SF
Corral setaside
(Min. 550 SF) 0 SF 550 SF 550 SF
Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 331 SF 331 SF
Attached Trellises 500 SF -500 SF 0 SF
Service Yard
(Min. 96 SF)
35 SF 61 SF 96 SF
Primary Driveway 610 SF 370 SF 980 SF
Paved walkways/Patio Areas/Courtyards252 SF 1,045 SF 1,297 SF Pool Decking 1,796 SF -1,796 SF 0 SF
Other Paved Driveways, Road Easements, Parking Pads1,497 SF -1,032 SF 465 SF Grading (must be balanced onsite)0 CY 98 CY CUT
98 CY FILL
196 CY TOTAL
Structural Lot Coverage 20% Max 4,095 SF (4.5%) 344 SF (0.4%) 4,439 SF (4.9%) Flatwork Lot Coverage 15% Max 4,155 SF (4.5%) -1,413 SF (-1.5%) 2,742 SF (3.0%) Total Lot Coverage 35% Max (Structures + Flatwork) 8,250 SF (9.0%) -1,069 SF (-1.2%) 7,181 SF (7.8%) Building Pad 1 Coverage
Existing Pad Area: 8,876 SF 4,095 SF (46.1%) - 1,048 SF (-11.8%) 3,047 SF (34.3%) Total Disturbed Area
(40% maximum) 13,551 SF (14.8%) -1,048 SF (-1.1%)12,503 SF (13.6%) Building Heights Maximum (21 FT Maximum) 14 FT, 2 IN 2 FT, 1 IN 16 FT, 3 IN

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN

REVIEW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, NON-EXEMPT GRADING
AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS; VARIANCE FOR AN

ATTACHED GARAGE WITHIN THE SIDE YARD AREAS, AND

FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 3
MAVERICK LANE (KARATSU) (LOT 30-SK)

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. On August 8, 2025, an application was duly filed by Louie Tomaro, agent with respect to real property located at 3 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 30-SK) requesting a Site Plan Review for new construction including a new attached garage and non-exempt grading and related improvements; and Variances for construction of the attached garage within the front and side yard areas.

Section 2. The property is zoned RAS-2 and is 2.11 acres net and 91,708 square feet net, as calculated for development purposes. The property is located east of Caballeros Road on Maverick Lane. There is one street frontage for the property along Maverick Lane. The property is regularly shaped and the topography is above grade off Maverick Lane and becomes sloped within the interior of the lot towards the Upper Willow Spring trail. There is a 40-foot-wide roadway easement along Maverick Lane and 20-foot-wide trail easement along the rear property line.

Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 27, 2026.

Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in three public places on January 16, 2026. The applicants and their agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal.

Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the proposed Project is the construction of an attached garage and single-family residence, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Section 5. Site Plan Review Findings. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new structure pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the proposed development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:

3 MAVERICK LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA. 90274

A NEW ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE

KARATSU RESIDENCE

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

RENDERINGS
G.01
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\G.01.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:47:18 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 100 of 675 3 MAVERICK LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA. 90274

A NEW ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE

KARATSU RESIDENCE
CA1 DEWATERING OPERATIONS - REMOVE SEDIMENTS FROM GROUND WATER
CA2 PAVING OPERATIONS - REDUCE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS FROM

PAVING OPERATIONS
CA3 STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION AND PAINTING - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES & PAINTING PROJECTS
CA10 MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGE - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM MATERIAL DELIVERY & STORAGE
CA11 MATERIAL USE - PREVENT & REDUCE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS

TO STORM WATER FROM MATERIAL USE
CA12 SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER SYSTEMS WITH GOOD

HOUSEKEEPING
CA20 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT - PREVENT & REDUCE DISCHARGE OF

POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER SYSTEMS FROM SOLID WASTE OR

CONSTRUCTION
CA21 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM TOXIC MATERIALS CA22 CONTAMINATED SOIL MANAGEMENT - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL CA23 CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENT - PREVENT & REDUCE DISHARGE

OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM CONCRETE WASTE
CA24 SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENT - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM SANITARY & SEPTIC

SYSTEMS
CA30 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANING - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM CLEANING OF

VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
CA31 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELING - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM FUELING OF

VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT
CA32 VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE - PREVENT & REDUCE

DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO STORM WATER FROM MAINTENANCE OF

VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT

MANAGEMENT
LIST OF BMP's (BEST

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

BMP'S WILL BE UTILIZED IN THE GRADING, BUILDING AND FINAL

CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THE PROJECT
ROLLING HILLS, CA.

VICINITY MAP

GENERAL NOTES

1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2022 CBC, 2022 CRC, 2022 CMC, 2022 CPC, 2022 CEC, 2022 CGBS, 2022 ENERGY STANDARDS AND CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ORDINANCES, CBC CHAPTER 7A, THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENERGY AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE COD.

2. AQMD NOTIFICATION IS REQUIRED 10 DAYS BEFORE BEGINNING ANY DEMOLITION WORK. REQUIRED FORM IS AVAILABLE AT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE PROOF OF NOTIFICATION (MAIL WITH RETURN RECEIPT) 10 DAYS BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED, OR COMPLETE ASBESTOS.

3. ALL BUILDING FEATURES PROJECTING INTO REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INDICATED ON SITE/PLOT PLAN.

4. SOILS REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR ALL CUTS, FILLS, AND EARTHWORK AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1804.1-1804.4 CBC.

5. STUMPS AND ROOTS SHALL BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF 12" IN THE AREA OCCUPIED BY THE BUILDING.

6. INSTALLATION OF INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALL AND CEILING COVERINGS SHALL CONFORM TO CHAPTER 25 IBC.

7. ALL WATER CLOSETS TO FLUSH WITH 1.28 GALLON MAX PER H&S CODE SEC. 17921.3(B).

8. ALL HOSE BIBS MUST BE PROTECTED BY BACK FLOW PREVENTION AND HAVE AN ANTI-SIPHON DEVICE.

9. PROVIDE APPROVED BACKWATER VALVE FOR ALL PLUMBING FIXTURES LOCATED BELOW THE ELEVATION OF THE NEXT UPSTREAM MANHOLE COVER. FIXTURES ABOVE SUCH ELEVATION SHALL NOT DISCHARGE THROUGH THE BACKWATER VALVE. PROVIDE CAST IRON WASTE PIPING.

10. ALL WINDOW COVERINGS REQUIRED BY CFIR. FORM SHALL BE POSTED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.

11. WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SCAQMD). (714) 396:2000 PER RULE 1403 FOR THE PROPER DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS.

12. ONLY LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVED DEVICES MAY BE UTILIZED FOR LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION BACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICES.

13. INSULATE ALL PLUMBING WITH MINIMUM R-3 INSULATION FOR ENTIRE LENGTH.

14. PROVIDE DRIP PAN OR SIMILAR DEVICE FOR LAUNDRY ROOM, WATER HEATER, AND DISHWASHER.

15. PROVIDE SURVEY STAKES PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION TO VERIFY LOT LINES.

16. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE GRADING OR DRAINAGE.

17. IAPMO APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ONE PIECE LAVATORY.

18. POST INSULATION COMPLIANCE CARD IN CONSPICUOUS LOCATION IN DWELLING PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.

19. ALL CONSTRUCTION WASTE AND DEBRIS MUST BE CONTAINERIZED AT ALL TIMES.

20. A REINSPECTION FEE OF $70.00 WILL BE CHARGED FOR AN INSPECTION WHICH IS NOT ACCESSIBLE, OR APPROVED PLANS ARE NOT ON SITE, OR JOB IS NOT READY.

21. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTORS, SUB CONTRACTORS, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS CONDUCTING BUSINESS

WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSE AS DESCRIBED IN THE MUNICIPAL CODE ORDINANCE NO. 092-559 AND RESOLUTION NO. R92-72.

22. ANY AND ALL DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED PLANS REQUIRE THAT REVISED PLANS BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT/COMMISSION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

23. APPROVAL IS REQUIRED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, CURB CORES, CURB/GUTTERS, ETC.

24. PRE-GRADE MEETING REQUIRED WITH CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, OWNER OR

OWNER'S AGENT, SOILS ENGINEER, GEOLOGIST (IF APPLICABLE) AND GRADING CONTRACTOR, PRIOR TO ANY WORK COMMENCING ON SITE.

25. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.

26. THE YARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL.

27. "CONSTRUCTION WASTE DISPOSAL CERTIFICATION" REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL.

28. THE CF-6R FORM SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS.

29. THE YARD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL.

30. THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE (VHFHSZ) AND THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED IN CONFORMANCE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC CHAPTER 7A.

31. FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT IF REQUIRED BY LA COUNTY FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE.

32. REQUIRED SWIMMING POOL FENCING AND ALARMS MUST BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

33. "DUST CONTROL MEASURES" SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT.

34. PROVIDE HOUSE STREET NUMBER VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM STREET.

35. SQUARE FOOTAGE SHALL BE CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR REGISTERED ENGINEER BEFORE APPROVAL OF THE FOUNDATION.

36. ALL CONTRACTORS, ARCHITECTS, DESIGNERS, & ENGINEERS SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSE.

37. ALL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SHALL BE TAMPER RESISTANT.

38. WHERE A FIXTURE IS INSTALLED ON A FLOOR LEVEL THAT IS LOWER THAN THE NEXT UPSTREAM MANHOLE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CITY APPROVED BACKWATER VALVE.

39. ROOF GUTTER SHALL BE DESIGNED / SCREENED TO PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF LEAVES.

40. INSTALL ONE OR BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS: INSTALLATION OF CONDUIT LEADING FROM AN EXTERIOR SOUTH-FACING, EAST-FACING OR WEST-FACING ROOF, WHERE A MINIMUM OF 4 HOURS OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT IS ACHIEVED, TO A STUBBED JUNCTION BOX NEXT TO THE ELECTRICAL PANEL.

ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT SHALL BE CAPPED AND PROVIDED WITH ADEQUATE FLASHING. THE CONDUIT SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON OR IN THE DIRECTION OF A NORTH-FACING ROOF. (ROOF REINFORCEMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION).

B. SOLAR WATER HEATING SYSTEM: INSTALLATION OF 3
4" HOT AND COLD COPPER WATER PIPES
FROM A SOUTH-FACING, EAST-FACING OR WEST-FACING ROOF, WHERE A MINIMUM OF 4 HOURS OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT CAN BE ACHIEVED, TO AN EXISTING WATER HEATER/TANK. BOTH ENDS OF THE 3
4" COPPER PIPES SHALL BE STUBBED OUT AND SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON OR IN THE DIRECTION OF NORTH-FACING ROOF. ALL EXPOSED PIPES SHALL BE CAPPED AND PROVIDED

WITH ADEQUATE FLASHING(STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND ANY ROOF REINFORCEMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION UNDER SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT).

41. AT TIME OF PERMIT ISSUANCE, CONTRACTOR SHALL SHOW THEIR VALID WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATE.

42. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTE ON SITE UNTIL IT CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC.

THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITS MUST BE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED

MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY THE FORCES OF WIND OR WATER. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND. FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS,

AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER.

SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.

43. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM REQUIRING THE

CORRECTION OF ERRORS ON THESE PLANS OR FROM PREVENTING ANY VIOLATION OF THE CODES ADOPTED BY THE CITY, RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND/OR REGULATIONS.

44. SEPARATE PERMIT SHALL FIRST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. SEPARATE

PERMIT SHALL FIRST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS, BORINGS, AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS MADE IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

45. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE BUILDING INSPECTOR WITH A

LOCATION/SETBACK CERTIFICATION THAT GIVES DIMENSIONS FROM THE PROPERTY LINES TO THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE'S FOUNDATION. THE CERTIFICATION SHALL BE PREPARED BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR.

PROJECT DATA
NO. OF STORIES: 1
NO. OF UNITS: 1
ZONING: RA/S-2

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

OCCUPANCY AND ZONING
OCCUPANCY:

CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-N
LOT 30
M.B. 67/31-32

MIKE & JANE KARATSU

PROPERTY OWNERS
1535 5th STREET
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266

APPLICABLE CODES

CITY, STATE, NATIONALLY

CONSULTANTS

CIVIL SURVEY CONSULTANT

FLOOR AREA CALCS
SCOPE OF WORK:
- A NEW ONE STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE - 2510 SF
LOT SIZE: 108,520 SF

GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT

SHEET INDEX
C.01
A.04
A.01 SITE PLAN
A.03 ROOF PLAN PLAN

ELEVATIONS

EXISTING CIVIL SURVEY
G.00 GENERAL INFORMATION
A.00 AREA CALCULC'S AND LOT COVERAGE CALC'S
A.02 FLOOR PLAN
2022 CRC, 2022 CBC, 2022 CMC, 2022 CPC, 2022 CEC, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES AND CH. 7A OF 2022 CBC, 2022 STATE ENERGY CODE, 2022 CA ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS, 2022 CA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, 2022 CA CODES WITH 2023 LA COUNTY BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 7A FOR RPV, CHAPTER 7A REQUIREMENTS FOR VERY HIGH FIRE-HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE APPLY, 5353 AND 6730 OF THE STATE BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE

EAGLE EYE LAND SURVEYING
1311 MANHATTAN BEACH BLVD.
#4 MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 92780
TELL: (310)955 8901.
[email protected]
T.I.N ENGINEERING
17834 BAILEY DRIVE
TORRANCE, CA 90504
TEL: (310) 371-7045

FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING -YES

SYMBOL LEGEND

ABBREVIATION
A.H.

A.W.

B.O.W.

C.H.

CLG.

CLR.

COL.

CONC.

C.W.

DIM.

DN.

ELEV.

F.A.

FLR.

FX.

HORZ.

HT.

LAND.

LT.WT.

MAX.

MIN.

OP.

PLINE.

REQ.

SECT.

S.F.E.

SHT.

SK.

SL.

T.O.W.

ACTUAL HEIGHT

AWNING WINDOW

BOTTOM OF WALL

CRITICAL HEIGHT

CEILING
CLEAR
COLUMN

CONCRETE

CASEMENT WINDOW

DIMENSION
DOWN

ELEVATION

FROM ABOVE
FLOOR
FIXED

HORIZONTAL
HEIGHT

LANDING

LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE

MAXIMUM

MINIMUM

OPERABLE

PROPERTY LINE

REQUIRED

SECTION

SUB FLOOR ELEVATION
SHEET
SKEWED
SLOPED

TOP OF WALL

DIFFERENTIAL IN FLOOR ELEVATION, FINISH

SURFACE, OR CHANGE IN WALL PLAN

LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE FLOOR

ELEVATION

TOP/BOTTOM RISER
DN. 0 R. @ 0" # OF RISERS UP/DOWN

LIVING ROOM ROOM NAME

SLOPE RUN

SLOPE RISE

EXTENTS OF REVISION

REVISION NUMBER

NORTH ARROW DESIGNATION

SKYLIGHT LETTER DESIGNATION

DOOR NUMBER DESIGNATION

WINDOW LETTER DESIGNATION

SECTION NUMBER

SHEET NUMBER
A
A-00
A
1 A

SURFACE DESCRIPTION

SLOPED SURFACE
(ARROW POINTS DOWN SLOPE)

ELEVATION DESIGNATION

SHEET NUMBER

ROOF SLOPE DESCRIPTION

ELEVATION

ELEVATION

FLOW LINE
(ARROW POINTS DOWN SLOPE)

SUB FLOOR ELEVATION

SUB-FLOOR ELEVATION
A

ROOF SLOPE
4:12
C
B A-00 D
100.00'
100.00'
100.00' S.F.E.

LT.WT.

S.F.E.

CEILING HEIGHT
8'-0" FLAT CLG.

NORTH

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

GENERAL

INFORMATIONS
G.00
- NEW HARDSCAPE
- NEW LANDSCAPE
LIVING AREA = 2510 SF
COVERED PORCH = 331 SF
GARAGE = 502 SF
WITH ATTACHED 2-CAR GARAGE - 502 SF
APN 7567-018-030
A.00.1 NEIGHBOR'S VICINITY MAP

PRACTICES)

CITY AREA CALCULATIONS

CABALLEROS RD CABALLEROS RD

MAVERICK LANE

SUBJECT

PROPERTY
- NEW RETAINING WALL AT FRONT YARD
PHONE: (310)-372-1010
RICHIE-BRAY INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2432 VIA AMADOR
PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90274
TEL: (310) 377-5868

LANDSCAPE DESIGN CONSULTANTS
PLANNING ZONING CASE #
A.01.1 SITE SECTIONS

INFORMATION
NTS
C.01.1 ENLARGED EXISTING CIVIL SURVEY (PARTIAL)
A.01.2 SITE PLAN - FIRE DEPARTMENT

CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT

BOLTON ENGINEERING CORP
25834 NARBONNE AVENUE SUITE 210
LOMITA, CA 90717
TEL: (310) 325-5580
C.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

GRADING AND EXCAVATION

INFORMATION
G.01 RENDERINGS
NET LOT AREA 91,708 SF
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\G.00.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:44:45 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 101 of 675 G 21'-101516
" 17'-7
5 8
"
38'-313
16"
29'-10"
29'-61
2 " 13'-101316
" 15'-101116
"
1285.0
1295.0
1305.0
1315.0
1325.0
1335.0
1350.0 1355.0
1340.0
1325.0
1315.0
1305.0
MAVERICK LN.

Legend-Grading Plan ENGINEERING CORP.

For Planning Review 8/6/2025 C1
Proposed Residence
Proposed Garage
Future Stable Setaside

MAVERICK LN. X X X X X X X X X X X X X G 21'-101516" 17'-758" 38'-31316" 29'-10" 29'-612" 13'-101316" 15'-101116" 1295.0 1305.0 1315.0 1325.0 1335.0 1350.0 1355.0 1340.0 1325.0 1315.0 1305.0

ENLARGED

ENLARGED EXISTING CIVIL SURVEY (PARTIAL)
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
C.01.1

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

EXISTING

CIVIL SURVEY

PARTIAL
7/22/2025 6:26:13 AM

MAVERICK LN. X X X X X X X X X X X X X G 21'-101516" 17'-758" 38'-31316" 29'-10" 29'-612" 13'-101316" 15'-101116" 1190.0 1180.0 1165.0 1175.0 1185.0 1195.0 1205.0 1215.0 1225.0 1235.0 1245.0 1255.0 1265.0 1275.0 1285.0 1295.0 1305.0 1315.0 1325.0 1335.0 1350.0 1355.0 1340.0 1325.0 1315.0 1305.0

EXISTING

EXISTING CIVIL SURVEY
SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0"
C.01

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

CIVIL SURVEY
7/21/2025 6:51:12 AM

NEW BUILDING COVERAGE = 3012 SF

NEW DRIVEWAY AND
NEW ENTRY PORCH = 151 SF
980 SF NEW DRIVEWAY
PATIOS = 937 SF
LEGEND
465 SF PARKING
PAD
PARKING PAD = 1445 SF
PAVED WALKS = 1297
1190.0
1180.0
1165.0
1175.0
1185.0
1195.0
1205.0
1215.0
1225.0
1235.0
1245.0
1255.0
1265.0 1275.0 1285.0 1295.0 1305.0 1315.0 1325.0 1335.0 1350.0 1355.0 1340.0
1325.0 1315.0
1305.0
1297 SF
20'-0" FRONT EASEMENT

FUTURE BARN
502 SF
GARAGE
151
3012 BDG
TOTAL
2510 SF

RESIDENCE

PATIOS AND

PAVED WALKS EASEMENT
6'-0" WIDE ACCESS PATH NEW STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE NEW BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING SETBACK 10'-0" 25'-0" REAR YARD EASEMENT 18'-4 3
4 "
20'-0" 50'-0" EASEMENT
FRONT SETBACK 17'-7 5
8 " 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK 10'-0" EASEMENT 6'-0"
6'-0"
20'-0" EASEMENT
50'-0" FRONT SETBACK
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK

LINE OF NET LOT AREA (TYP)
180

COVERED
PORCH EASEMENT 10'-0"

NET LOT AREA LINE
AREA = 91,708 10'-0" EASEMENT 25'-8"
5'-0" 5'-0"
31'-2" NEW HOUSE TO PL
29'-11" EXISTING HOUSE TO PL 15'-8 DRIVE
(E) BUILDING COVERAGE = 2950 SF
(E) DRIVEWAY = 610 SF
(E) PERGOLA = 500 SF
LEGEND
(E) PARKING PAD = 1497
(E) POOL
130
1497 SF PARKING
PAD
610 SF (E) DRIVEWAY
500 SF (E)

TRELLIS
480 SF
GARAGE
2950 SF

RESIDENCE
3430 BDG
TOTAL
152 SF
PAVED
WOLKS
100 SF
PAVED
WOLKS
1796 SF

POOL DECKING
(E) POOL DECKING = 1796 SF
(E) PAVED WALKS = 252
1190.0
1180.0
1165.0
1175.0
1185.0
1195.0
1205.0
1215.0
1225.0
1235.0
1245.0
1255.0
1265.0
1295.0 1305.0 1315.0 1325.0 1335.0 1350.0 1355.0
1340.0
1325.0 1315.0
1305.0 35'-0" 10'-0" SIDE SETBACK EASEMENT

LINE OF NET LOT AREA (TYP)
20'-0" EASEMENT
50'-0" FRONT SETBACK
25'-0" REAR YARD EASEMENT
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK EASEMENT 10'-0" EASEMENT 10'-0"

NET LOT AREA LINE
AREA = 91,708

LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS FOR NEW BUILDING
SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0"
AREA

CALCULATIONS/

LOT COVERAGE
A.00

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

LOT COVERAGE CALCULATIONS FOR EXISTING BUILDING
SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0"
GROSS LOT AREA = 108,520 SF
NET LOT AREA = 91,658 SF
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A-00.DWG, 12/12/2025 4:10:46 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 105 of 675

CABALLEROS RD CABALLEROS RD

MAVERICK LANE
(E) HOUSE FOOTPRINT

NEW PROPOSED BLD'G
127'
25'
118'
51'
35'
61'
38'

CABALLEROS RD CABALLEROS RD

MAVERICK LANE

NEIGHBOR VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1/ 32" = 1'-0"

NEIGHBOR

VICINITY
MAP
A.00.1

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

NEIGHBOR VICINITY MAP - FULL VIEW
SCALE: 1/ 128" = 1'-0"
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.00.1.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:16:27 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 106 of 675 1352.66' RIDGE 1355.0'
1341.5' 1339.0'
T.O.W B.O.W
1339.50'

FIRST FLOOR

SITE SECTION C-C
(E)GRADE ON THE LOT
1338.83' TOW
1335.1' BOW
EXIST. CONC. RET WALL

TO RECEIVE NEW STUCCO

COLOR COAT
1339.50'

FIRST FLOOR
1355.25' RIDGE
1338.83' TOW
1339.3' F.S.
1339.5' F.S. 1339.3' F.S.
1346.0' T.O.W 1351.0' F.S.

SITE SECTION B-B
NEW RET.

WALL 1333.2' BOW
(E)GRADE ON THE LOT
EXIST. CONC. RET WALL

TO RECEIVE NEW STUCCO

COLOR COAT

STONE ON

FACE OF

NEW WALL
1338.5' MOTOR
1339.0'
COURT
1345.0' F.S.

F.S.
1338.0' GRADE
1339.0' TOW
1335.2' BOW
EXIST. CONC. RET WALL

TO RECEIVE NEW STUCCO

COLOR COAT

SITE SECTION
A.01.1

SITE SECTION A-A
SCALE: 1/ 8" = 1'-0"

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

SITE SECTION B-B
SCALE: 1/ 8" = 1'-0"

SITE SECTION C-C
SCALE: 1/ 8" = 1'-0"
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.01.1.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:17:05 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 107 of 675

NEW RESIDENCE
GARAGE
502 SF
MAVERICK LN.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1295.0
1305.0 1315.0
1325.0
1335.0 1350.0 1355.0
1340.0
1325.0
1315.0
1305.0
(E)SITE WALL
(E)SITE WALL
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x NEW STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE PATIO ENTRY PORCH LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE

NEW RET WALL

IN FRONT OF

EXISTING WALL NEW BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING SETBACK
DRIVE
1339.5'

EXISTING STAIRS

TO REMAIN
LINE OF EXIST.

STRUCTURE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE 10'-0" EASEMENT PATIO
1339.42'

SIDE YARD EASEMENT

SIDE YARD EASEMENT
PORCH
1339.42'
PORCH
1339.42'
1000 SF FUTURE CORRAL AND STABLE
(450 SF FOR STABLE)
(550 SF FOR CORRAL)
EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN 18'-4
3 4
"
20'-0"
30'-0"

EASEMENT
FRONT SETBACK 13'-11" 17'-7
5 8
" 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK
6'-0" WIDE

ACCESS BARN/ STABLE

EXISTING SLOPE
1 1
2" : 1'

EXISTING SLOPE
1 1
2" : 1' 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK 10'-0" EASEMENT 1345.0 1340.0 6'-0" WIDE ACCESS PATH
6'-0"
6'-0" 6'-0" WIDE ACCESS PATH
20'-0" EASEMENT
30'-0" FRONT SETBACK

EXISTING SLOPE
2 : 1

EXISTING SLOPE
1 : 1 MAX
(1338)
3 UP

MOTOR COURT

NEW DRIVEWAY
APPROACH IN EXIST.

LOCATION

EXISTING TREES

TO BE REMOVED
6'-0" WIDE ACCESS PATH 25'-8"
5'-0" 5'-0" MIN

RAMP RIDGE

SETBACK LINE

SETBACK LINE

NEW HOUSE TO PL
CENTER LINE OF STREET 29'-11" EXISTING HOUSE TO PL
APPROX. LOCATION OF NEW SEPTIC SYSTEM (1343) TOW = 1342.0' BOW = 1339.0' 1350.0 1348.0 1346.2
BOW = 1339.0' TOW = 1342.0' TOW = 1341.5' BOW = 1339.0' PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42' TOW = 1341.5' BOW = 1339.0' TOW = 1341.0' BOW = 1339.0' 1344.4 1342.6
1340.8 1339.0 TOW = 1342.0' BOW = 1339.0' TOW = 1340.5 BOW = 1339.0' CURB 6" BOW = 1340.5'
TOW = 1342.0'
BOW = 1339.0'
TOW = 1340.5'
BOW = 1339.0'
TOW = 1342.0' (1344) (1342) (1341) (1340) (1339)
7 % 20 % 2 %
1346.2 BOW
1348.0 TOW
1348.0 BOW
1350.0 TOW TOW = 1346.0 BOW = 1342.0'
1346.2 BOW
1348.7 TOW TOW = 1344.5' BOW = 1343.0' 3'-2
1 4
"
31'-2" 6'-0
1 8
" 3'-0"
2510 SF RIDGE = 1355.25'
RIDGE = 1352.66'
RIDGE = 1354.75' RIDGE = 1352.6' RIDGE = 1355.25.'
RIDGE = 1352.66' RIDGE = 1352.66' RIDGE = 1351.8'
RIDGE = 1354.75' 1352.66'
DRIVE
1339.5' 15'-8
1 8
" ACTUAL DRIVE
26'-7"
WIDE ROAD 150' 150'

FIRE FIGHTER TRUCK

LOCATION ON THE
STREET 5-0" FIRE FIGHTERS PATH 5-0" FIRE FIGHTERS PATH
6'-0" WIDE ACCESS PATH

TOP OF WALL
= 1339.0'

TOP OF WALL
= 1338.83' 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12" 4.5":12" SLOPE
NEW 3-RAIL
FENCE
SLOPE
4":12"
SLOPE
4":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12" 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 12'-0" DRIVEWAY TRASH AREA IN THE YARD 96 SF

SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

SITE PLAN
A.01

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.01.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:18:21 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 108 of 675

NEW RESIDENCE
GARAGE
502 SF
MAVERICK LN.
x x x x x x x x x
1285.0
1295.0
1305.0 1315.0
1325.0 1335.0 1350.0 1355.0
1340.0
1325.0
1315.0
1305.0
x
x x x x x x x NEW STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE NEW BUILDING SETBACK EXISTING SETBACK DRIVE
1339.5' EXISTING STRUCTURE TO PROPERTY LINE 10'-0" EASEMENT PATIO
1339.42'
PORCH
1339.42'
PORCH
1339.42' 18'-4
34 "
20'-0" 30'-0" EASEMENT
FRONT SETBACK 13'-11" 17'-7
5 8
" 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK 35'-0" SIDE SETBACK 10'-0" EASEMENT 1345.0 1340.0 6'-0"
6'-0"
20'-0" EASEMENT
30'-0" FRONT SETBACK 25'-8"
5'-0" 5'-0" MIN

NEW HOUSE TO PL
29'-11" EXISTING HOUSE TO PL
PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42'
PATIO
1339.42' 3'-2
1 4
"
31'-2" 6'-0
1 8
" 3'-0"
2510 SF
DRIVE
1339.5' 15'-8
1 8
" ACTUAL DRIVE
26'-7"
WIDE ROAD 5-0" FIRE FIGHTERS PATH 5-0" FIRE FIGHTERS PATH 12'-0" DRIVEWAY 150' 60' 90'
30' 60'
40' 20'
FIRE TRUCK 150'

SUBJECT PROPERTY
3 MAVERICK LANE
APN 7567-018-030

CABALLEROS RD CABALLEROS RD

MAVERICK LANE

SITE PLAN

SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0"
A.01.2

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

1. APPROVED BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, BUILDING NUMBERS OR APPROVED BUILDING

IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED SO AS TO BE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROPERTY. THE NUMBERS SHALL

CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, BE ARABIC NUMERALS OR ALPHABET LETTERS, AND BE A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MINIMUM STROKE WIDTH OF 0.5 INCH. FIRE CODE 505.1

2. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEASURE 6" X 4" X 2-1/2", BRASS OR BRONZE, CONFORMING TO AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARD C503, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. CLEARANCE OF BRUSH AND VEGETATIVE GROWTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED PER FIRE CODE 325 ACTION REQUIRED: PROVIDE NOTE ON SITE PLAN.

8. SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 1. IN EACH SLEEPING ROOM. 2. OUTSIDE EACH SEPARATE SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOMS. 3. ON EACH ADDITIONAL STORY OF THE DWELLING,

INCLUDING BASEMENTS AND HABITABLE ATTICS BUT NOT INCLUDING CRAWL SPACES AND UNINHABITABLE ATTICS. IN DWELLINGS OR DWELLING UNITS WITH SPLIT LEVELS

AND WITHOUT AN INTERVENING DOOR BETWEEN THE ADJACENT LEVELS, A SMOKE

ALARM INSTALLED ON THE UPPER LEVEL SHALL SUFFICE FOR THE ADJACENT LOWER

LEVEL PROVIDED THAT THE LOWER LEVEL IS LESS THAN ONE FULL STORY BELOW THE UPPER LEVEL. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED

WITHIN AN INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE ALARM DEVICES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED

IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT. RESIDENTIAL CODE R314.3

SMOKE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE THEIR PRIMARY POWER SOURCE FROM THE BUILDING WIRING

PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND SHALLBE EQUIPPED WITH BATTERY BACK-UP.

9. 11. SINGLE- AND MULTIPLE- STATION CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL BE LISTED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF URL 2034. CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS SHALL BE LISTED AS COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF URL 2075. CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS REQUIRED BY (SECTIONS R315.1 AND R315.2) OR (SECTIONS 420.4.1 AND 420.4.2) SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 1. OUTSIDE OF EACH

SEPARATE DWELLING UNIT SLEEPING AREA IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF THE BEDROOM(S). 2. ON EVERY LEVEL OF A DWELLING UNIT INCLUDING BASEMENTS. 3. FOR R-1 ONLY. A. ON THE CEILING OF SLEEPING UNITS WITH PERMANENTLY INSTALLED FUEL-BURNING APPLIANCES. RESIDENTIAL CODE R315.3, BUILDING CODE 420.4.3

CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS SHALL RECEIVE THEIR PRIMARY POWER SOURCE FROM THE

BUILDING WIRING PROVIDED THAT SUCH WIRING IS SERVED FROM A COMMERCIAL SOURCE AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH BATTERY BACK-UP.

10. WHEN MORE THAN ONE SMOKE ALARM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED

WITHIN AN INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE ALARM DEVICES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED

IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT. RESIDENTIAL CODE R314.3

12. WHEN MORE THAN ONE CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED

WITHIN AN INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNIT THE ALARM DEVICES SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED

IN SUCH A MANNER THAT THE ACTUATION OF ONE ALARM WILL ACTIVATE ALL OF THE ALARMS IN THE INDIVIDUAL UNIT. RESIDENTIAL CODE R315.5

13. FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES:

FIRE

DEPARTMENT
FH
FH

FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION NTS

ALL REQUIRED PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, TESTED AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRTUCTION. FIRE CODE 501.4

14. THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW IS BASED ON THE FOLOWING CALCULATION:

TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PER THE BUILDING CODE: .........TYPE V-N VHFHSZ ...................................................................... YES FIRE FLOW BASED ON THE FIRE FLOW CALCULATION AREA... gpm REDUCTION FOR THE SPRINKLERS (MAX 50%)..................gpm (min) TOTAL FIRE FLOW REQUIRED............ ...........................1,250 gpm

FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION AND INFO
RESIDUAL PRESSURE = 30 PSI
STATIC PRESSURE = 55 PSI
FIRE FLOW @ 20 PSI = 450 GPM FOR 2 HOURS
ORIFICE SIZE = 2.5"
PILOT = 5 PSI
FIRE FLOW CALCULATION AREA................................... SF FOR 3 MAVERICK LANE,RH 90274
206'

SPACING OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE DISTANCES SPECIFIED IN FIRE CODE C105.2 TROUGH C106.1

15. R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.01.2.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:17:49 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 109 of 675 B
1 3
4568

13.14568
C
D
F
B

KITCHEN ISLAND
339.5' LIP
2 27
7 E
E

KITCHEN
SLAB=395.5'

MUD ROOM
SLAB=395.5'

LAUNDRY
SLAB=395.5'
2-CAR GARAGE
SLAB

GREAT ROOM
SLAB=395.5'
POWDER
SLAB=395.5'
BEDROOM #1
SLAB=395.5'
BEDROOM #2
SLAB=395.5'
BATH #2
SLAB=395.5'
BEDROOM #3
SLAB=395.5'
MASTER BEDROOM JACK AND JILL BATH SLAB=395.5'

MASTER BATH
SLAB=395.5'

DINING ROOM
SLAB=395.5'
CLOSET
SLAB=395.5'

ENTRY PORCH
PATIO
PATIO

BASE CABINET STORAGE

POWER WALL

HW-TANK
WH 3.1

VITREOUS CHINA

VITREOUS CHINA
3 VITREOUS CHINA
LINEN
LINEN
PATIO D1 C1

MASTER CLOSET
SLAB=395.5'
5'-111
2 " 15'-10" 5'-0" 16'-0" 17'-6" 18'-0" 6'-0" 20'-11" 4'-7" 24'-0" 12'-10 2 1
" 19'-0" 5'-6
2 1
"
5'-111
2 " 15'-10" 5'-0" 15'-61
2 " 18'-5" 17'-6
1 2
" 6'-0" 20'-11"
2'-10"
FAU

FURNACE
A E1A A1 47'-9" 3'-5"
105'-2
1 2
"
105'-2
1 2
" 4'-2"
G 1'-7" 10'-0"
G

STONE VENEER WAINSCOT
PANTRY
SLAB=395.5' 47'-9" 1'-9" 8'-7"

TRASH YARD

FLOOR PLAN

FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
A.02

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.02.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:19:17 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 110 of 675 8'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
9'-6" PLATE
9'-6" PLATE
10'-6" PLATE
10'-6" PLATE
9'-6" PLATE
9'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
8'-6" PLATE
8'-0" PLATE
8'-0" PLATE
RIDGE = 134.52.0'
B
1 3

44.568

13.144.568
C
D
F
B
2 27
7 E
E 3.1
3 D1 C1
A E1A A1
G
G
RIDGE = 1355.25' RIDGE = 1352.66' RIDGE = 1353.6'RIDGE = 1355.25.' RIDGE = 1352.6' RIDGE = 1352.66' RIDGE = 1352.66' RIDGE = 1351.8' RIDGE = 1353.6'
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12" SLOPE 4":12" SLOPE 4":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE 4.5":12" SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12" SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"
SLOPE

4.5":12"

ROOF PLAN
A.03

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

PLATE HT CALCULATIONS
PERIMETER OF BUILDING = 304 LF
8'-6" PLATE = 171 FT 56.4% - 50% MIN REQ'D
9'-6" PLATE = 81 FT 27 % - 30% MAX ALOW.
10'-6" PLATE = 82 FT 17 % - 20% MAX. ALOW.

R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.03.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:19:47 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 111 of 675 1339.5' SUBFLOOR 7'-10 1/2" 8'-0" 8'-6" 10'-6" PLATE HT PLATE HT

BORAL - PROSHAKE - MADERA BLEND ROOFING,
CLASS "A" PER BUILDING CODE 14.504.5.1.1
(MAX. ROOFING MATERIAL WT. = 7.4.50 LBS PER S.F.)
12" HALF ROUND COPPER DORMER VENTS AT SLOPED ROOF.

PROVIDE 1 SF OF VENT FOR EVERY 14.50 SF OF ATTIC AREA.

SEE ROOF PLAN FOR LOCATIONS.

LINE OF FINISHED GRADE
1X6 CIDAR HORIZONTAL SIDING 16'-3" TOTAL HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE FROM FINISHED GRADE 9'-6" PLATE HT 9'-6" PLATE HT 20'-6" TOTAL HEIGHT TO TOP OF CHIMNEY FROM FINISHED GRADE

4.5 12 4.5
12 4.5
12 4.5
12 4.5
12 4.5
12 FG
1339.0'
1339.5' SUBFLOOR 8'-6" PLATE HT
RIDGE
1355.25'
RIDGE
1351.8'
FS
1339.0' 8'-0"9'-6" 9'-6" 8'-0" 8'-6" 8'-0" 8'-6"

BORAL - PROSHAKE - MADERA BLEND ROOFING,
CLASS "A" PER BUILDING CODE 14.504.5.1.1
(MAX. ROOFING MATERIAL WT. = 7.4.50 LBS PER S.F.)
12" HALF ROUND COPPER DORMER VENTS AT SLOPED ROOF.

PROVIDE 1 SF OF VENT FOR EVERY 14.50 SF OF ATTIC AREA.

SEE ROOF PLAN FOR LOCATIONS.

SQUARE CUSTOM WOOD COLUMNS.

SEE DETAIL
-
- PLATE HT PLATE HT PLATE HT PLATE HT WINDOWS/DOORS HT
1X6 CIDAR HORIZONTAL SIDING 16'-3"

LINE OF FINISHED GRADE TOTAL HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE FROM FINISHED GRADE PLATE HT WINDOWS/DOORS HT

BOUQUET CANYON STONE VENEER

ATTACHED TO BROWN COAT PER CBC
1404.5.6 10'-6"TOTAL HEIGHT TO TOP OF CHIMNEY FROM FINISHED GRADE

4.5 12

4.5 12

4.5 12 4.5
12 4.5
12 4.5
12 PEAK
1353.6'
1339.5' SUBFLOOR 20'-6"
FG
1339.0'
PEAK
1351.6'
RIDGE
1351.8'
RIDGE
1351.86
RIDGE
1355.25'
RIDGE
1355.25'
PEAK 1352.66
1339.5' SUBFLOOR 1339.5' SUBFLOOR

STONE CAP ON WALL

TO BE WINDOW SILL
PEAK
1351.6' 6'-0"

TRASH YARD

BORAL - PROSHAKE - MADERA BLEND ROOFING,
CLASS "A" PER BUILDING CODE 14.504.5.1.1
(MAX. ROOFING MATERIAL WT. = 7.4.50 LBS PER S.F.)

BOUQUET CANYON STONE VENEER

ATTACHED TO BROWN COAT PER CBC
1404.5.6
1X6 CIDAR HORIZONTAL SIDING
1339.5' SUBFLOOR 1339.5' SUBFLOOR 8'-0" PLATE HT10'-6" PLATE HT 8'-6" PLATE HT16'-3" TOTAL HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE FROM FINISHED GRADE 10'-6" PLATE HT FS1339.0'

BORAL - PROSHAKE - MADERA BLEND ROOFING,
CLASS "A" PER BUILDING CODE 14.504.5.1.1
(MAX. ROOFING MATERIAL WT. = 7.4.50 LBS PER S.F.)

BOUQUET CANYON STONE VENEER

ATTACHED TO BROWN COAT PER CBC
1404.5.6
1X6 CIDAR HORIZONTAL SIDING

LINE OF FINISHED GRADE
1339.5' SUBFLOOR 1339.5' SUBFLOOR 10'-6" PLATE HT 10'-6" PLATE HT 15'-10 1/8" TOTAL HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE FROM FINISHED GRADE 8'-6" TRASH YARD 6'-0"

ELEVATIONS

EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" A.04

SHEET NUMBER

COPYRIGHT

DRAWING

PRINT DATE

PROJECT NUMBER

REVISIONS
STAMP

PROJECT
25004

REVISION SCHEDULE

NUMBER DESCRIPTION DATE

RESIDENCE
3 MAVERICK LANE

ROLLING HILLS
CALIFORNIA 90274

KARATSU

WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION ( SIDE)
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION ( SIDE)
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
R:\$WP\2025\25004\05 DRAWINGS\CD\A.04.dwg, 12/12/2025 3:21:22 PM, AutoCAD PDF (General Documentation).pc3 Page 112 of 675 Item: 10.B.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Reina Schaetzl, Wildan Principal Planner
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Receive and file Zoning Case No. 25-115: Site plan review for new construction, nonexempt grading and related improvements; variances for an attached garage within front yard, addition to home in side yard, and to exceed 40 percent disturbance; and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for location at 2 Williamsburg Lane (Paesano) (Lots 44, 45, & 46-A-RH)
Background:

Zoning, Location, and Lot Description
The property is an irregular-shaped parcel zoned RAS-1 with Overlay Zoned District (OZD-1), located just east of Middleridge Road with frontage on Middleridge Road and Williamsburg Lane. The net lot size is 54,525 square feet (1.25 acres) and includes a 15-foot-wide roadway easement along Williamsburg Lane.The subject property is currently developed with:
• 3,100 square-foot single-family residence;
• 540 square-foot attached garage;
• 490 square-foot swimming pool;
• 75 square feet of pool equipment;
• 65 square-foot stable;
• 230 square-foot attached trellis; and
• 90 square-foot service yard.

The first residential building pad is 7,010 square feet and contains the existing house, garage, and pool The second pad is 2,275 square feet, and includes the existing stable and additional set aside area for the potential stable expansion and a corral.

Previous Approvals
On May 25, 1995, the Traffic Commission recommended approval of the applicant's request for a revised driveway apron. This request consisted of a reduction of a 46-foot-wide curb to be cut to 24 feet, which extends 11 feet east from its original location.

On December 19, 1995, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 95-22 for a Variance to

encroach into the front yard setback to construct a bay window and a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct an entry porch.

Planning Commission Approval January 27, 2026
On January 27, 2026, the Planning Commission held a morning field trip at the subject property, with Chair Chelf absent. Vice Chair Kirkpatrick and Commissioner Soo recused themselves due to proximity to the project but the Vice Chair was allowed to participate to achieve a quorum.

Additionally, Kathryn Bishop from the Rolling Hills Community Association, residents Leah Mirsch (4 Cinchring Road) and Dianna Nuccion (1 Williamsburg Lane) were present at the morning field trip.

The applicant's architect was also in attendance. Chair Chelf was able to attend a separate field trip later that morning. No major concerns were reported and the field trip proceeded to the public hearing meeting later that evening at City Hall. All Commissioners were present. During the evening public hearing, staff presented the project. The applicants' architect attended the evening meeting, and no members of the public were present. Vice Chair Kirkpatrick and Commissioner Soo recused themselves due to proximity to the project. After review and discussion, the Commission voted unanimously (3-0) to approve the project and adopted Resolution number 2026-02 (Attachment D).

Discussion:

Applicant Request
On August 8, 2025, an application was duly filed by Miles Pritzkat & Johnson Architects, agent for John and Wendy Paesano, requesting approval of the following proposed improvements (collectively referred to as the “Project”):
• 900 square-foot addition to the main residence;
• Conversion of 540 square-feet of existing attached garage to living area; • 1,150 square-foot basement;
• 705 square-foot attached garage.

In addition to the above structures, the Project also includes a new 775 square-foot pool and spa to replace the existing pool with hardscape, landscaping, and other related site work improvements.

Additional features, such as the outdoor kitchen, chicken coop, pool equipment, and other hardscape elements, are proposed but are not subject to discretionary review.

A preliminary landscape plan has been prepared and will be reviewed by the City's landscape consultant for compliance with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). The review shall include a planting plan that will consider the appropriateness and adaptability of selected plant materials, water-efficient irrigation design, and the integration of design elements that complement the character of the community.

Site Plan Review
Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (“RHMC”) Section 17.46.020. The applicant is proposing an expansion of the existing residence and garage, resulting in a footprint of approximately 4,000 square feet of total floor area.

The proposed grading for the residence is 730 cubic yards (“CY”) of export and 703 cubic yards of fill, for a total of 1,433 cubic yards. The basement excavation consists of 27 CY of export of soil, which is exempt from total grading measurements, as per RHMC 17.16.230. The plans for this project can be found in Attachment E.

Variances

RHMC Section 17.17.030 requires a 30’ front yard setback from the front easement line for structures in OZD-1 and RHMC Section 17.16.120 requires a 20’ side yard setback from the property line for any structures in RAS-1. The applicant is requesting to construct the attached garage within the front yard setback line and the proposed basement/home addition within the side yard setback line. Given the irregular shape of the lot and expansive street frontages along both Middleridge Road and Williamsburg Lane, the front setback area is narrow and the buildable pad area is limited to the west side of Williamsburg Lane. Given this shape, and limits of buildable pad area, a Variance is warranted.

RHMC Section 17.16.070(B) limits the amount of disturbed area to 40% of the net lot area. The project proposal exceeds the total disturbance by 4% for a total of 44%. Given the limited buildable area along the street frontages, shape of the lot and limited buildable area to the east of the property along Williamsburg, a variance is warranted.

Lot Merger
2 Williamsburg is recorded as three separate lots. Although the lots share one Assessor Parcel Number, the lots are considered separate and distinct, which poses a risk that the Project will cross over the lot lines. The City's Zoning Code prohibits such development, and Section 706 of the California Building Codes requires the construction of fire walls for structures that cross lot lines.

In order to address the issue, City staff have added as a condition of approval that the Applicant merge the three lots into a single parcel. Although the City does not have an ordinance governing lot mergers, the Subdivision Map Act allows a merger of four or fewer contiguous parcels through a lot line adjustment (Government Code Section 66412(d).) The lot line adjustment would move all lot lines so that each lot line is coterminous with each other, effectively merging the lots. In order to avoid additional requirements from the California Building Codes, the lot line adjustment shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit.

MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE
Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage
The Project complies with all required setbacks in the RAS-1 Zone, OZD-1 Overlay Zone, and meets the Zoning Code lot coverage standards in the RHMC. The existing structural lot coverage is 5,350 square feet (9.8%), and the project proposes a net addition of 1,670 square feet (3.1%) for a total of 7,020 square feet (12.9%) of structural lot coverage. This is well below the maximum allowed 20% structural coverage.

The existing flatwork coverage is 4,007 square feet (7.3%). The flatwork onsite will be increased by 1,126 square feet (2.1%) upon approval of the project and the new flatwork area will total 5,133 square feet (9.4%). The maximum allowable is 15% flatwork coverage. See the “Development Table” (Attachment C) for further details.

Finally, the total lot coverage will result in 12,033 square feet or 22.1%, which is below the 35% structural and flatwork total coverage guideline. The development table can be found in Attachment C.

Staff has included a radius map (Attachment A) and a vicinity map (Attachment B).

Neighbor Support
Three public comments (Attachment F) were received and included.

Pulic Concerns

There have been no responses to the public hearing notices mailed on January 15, 2026.

Review by RHCA
The Rolling Hills Community Association reviewed and conceptually approved the attached garage and residence plans on May 20, 2025, subject to City approvals.

Environmental Review
The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences.

Additional Information:

For informational purposes only, the residence is working with the RHCA and Southern California Edison to underground utility lines, which are outside the scope of the Planning Commission’s review and this project.

Fiscal Impact:

None.

Recommendation:

Receive and file.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - PL_ADR_260309_2WilliamsburgLn_ZC25-115_RadiusMap

2. Attachment B - PL_ADR_260309_2WilliamsburgLn_ZC25-115_CC VicinityMap

3. Attachment C - PL_ADR_260114_2Williamsburg_DevelopmentTable_F

4. Attachment D - 2026-02_PC_Resolution_2WilliamsburgLn_ZC25-115_F_A_E

5. Attachment E - PL_ADR_260112_2WilliamsburgLn_ZC25-115_Plans_A

6. Attachment F - CL_AGN_260309_CC_Item10B_PublicComment

City of Rolling Hills
TITLE RADIUS MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 25-115
Site Plan Review & Variances
OWNER Paesano
ADDRESS 2 Williamsburg, Rolling Hills, CA 90274

City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 25-115
Site Plan Review, Variance
OWNER Karatsu
ADDRESS 3 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills 90274

Development Table
Zoning Case No. 25-115
2 Williamsburg Ln.

EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
RAS-1 Zone/OZD-1 SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE, POOL,
STABLE

SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE, POOL,
STABLE
Net Lot Area 54,525 SF 0 SF 54,525 SF
Residence 3,100 SF 900 SF 4,000 SF
Garage 540 SF 165 SF 705 SF
Swimming Pools/Spa 490 SF 285 SF 775 SF
Pool Equipment 75 SF -15 SF 60 SF
Stable
*existing 365 to be converted to 450
Min. setaside
365 SF 85 SF 450 SF
Corral
(550 SF Min. set aside)
550 SF 0 SF 550 SF
Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 130 SF 130 SF
Attached Trellises 230 SF 0 SF 230 SF
Outdoor Kitchen + Fire Pit 0 SF 246 SF 246 SF
Service Yard
(Min. 96 SF)
117 SF 0 SF 117 SF
Chicken Coop 0 SF 120 SF 120 SF
Basement Area 0 SF 1,150 SF 1,150 SF
Depth of Basement 0 SF 10 FT 10 FT
Primary Driveway 1,550 SF 100 SF 1,650 SF
Paved walkways/Patio Areas/Courtyards 1,540 SF -240 SF 1,300 SF Pool Decking 800 SF 900 SF 1,700 SF
Grading
(balanced onsite, basement exempt)
730 CY CUT
703 CY FILL
1,433 CY TOTAL
*27 CY export, basement
exempt
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% Max)
5,350 SF (9.8%) 1,670 SF (3.1%) 7,020 SF (12.9%)
Flatwork Lot Coverage
(15% Max)
4,007 SF (7.3%) 1,126 SF (2.1%) 5,133 SF (9.4%)
Total Lot Coverage
Structures + Flatwork (35% Max)
9,357 SF (17.2%) 2,676 SF (4.9%) 12,033 SF (22.1%)
Building Pad 1 Coverage 3,757 SF (53.6%)
7,010 SF Existing Pad Area
1,350 SF (19.3%)
+720 SF Proposed Pad Area
5,107 SF (66.1%)
7,730 SF Total Pad Area
Building Pad 2 Coverage 930 SF (40.9%)
2,275 SF Existing Pad Area
70 SF (3.1%)
+710 SF Proposed Pad Area
1,000 SF (33.5%)
2,985 SF Total Pad Area
Total Disturbed Area
(40% Max.)
23,800 SF (43.6%) 385 SF (0.7%) 24,185 SF (44.4%)
Building Heights Maximum
(21 FT Max.)
20 FT 1 FT IN 21 FT IN

1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-02

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NEW

CONSTRUCTION, NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS; VARIANCES FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE WITHIN
FRONT YARD, ADDITION TO HOME IN SIDE YARD, AND TO EXCEED 40 PERCENT DISTURBANCE; AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 2 WILLIAMSBURG LANE (PAESANO) (LOTS 44, 45, & 46-A-RH)

THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. On October 17, 2025, an application was duly filed by Miles Pritzkat & Johnson Architects, agent with respect to real property located at 2 Williamsburg Lane, Rolling Hills (LOTS 44, 45, & 46-A-RH) requesting a Site Plan Review for new construction including a new attached garage and non-exempt grading and related improvements; and variances for an attached garage within front yard, addition to home in side yard, and to exceed 40 percent disturbance.

Section 2. The property is zoned RAS-1 with Overlay Zoned District (OZD-1) and is 54,525 square feet (1.25 acres), as calculated for development purposes. located just east of Middleridge Road with frontage on Middleridge Road and Williamsburg Lane. The net lot size is 54,525 square feet (1.25 acres) and includes a 15-foot-wide roadway easement along Williamsburg Lane.

Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 27, 2026.

Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in three public places on January 15, 2026. The applicants and their agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal.

Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the proposed Project is the construction of an attached garage and single-family residence, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Section 5. Site Plan Review Findings. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new structure pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the proposed development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:

2 A. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance.

The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback requirements with the Variance approved by this Resolution. The lot is 1.25 acres net and 54,525 square feet net, as calculated for development purposes. The size of the existing and proposed structures will be 7,020 square feet, which constitutes 12.9% of the net lot area, and the flatwork and driveways will be 5,133 square feet which equals 9.4% of the net lot, and the total structural and flatwork is 12,033 square feet or 22.1% which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage permitted.

B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot.

The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot, has been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed construction will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.

C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.

The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. The proposed garage will be consistent with the pattern and style of the proposed residence.

D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls).

The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan will supplement the existing vegetation with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community.

E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area.

3 The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by reducing building coverage due to the decreased proposed footprint.

F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course.

The property will still maintain the existing terrain and existing drainage will remain as there will be minimal and balanced proposed grading. Drainage will continue to flow in the existing drainage course.

G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas.

Landscaping will meet the requirements of the water efficient landscape ordinance and incorporate low impact development practices. Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected and new landscaping will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community.

H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.

The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will alter the existing circulation pattern to remove the existing driveway from the side yard easement and will reestablish the 10-foot easement minimum.

I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Section 6. Variance Findings. RHMC Sections 17.17.030 requires a 30’ front yard setback and RHMC Section 17.16.120 requires a 20’ side yard setback for all structures. The applicant is requesting to construct the new attached garage in front yard setback and the home addition with basement in the 20’ western side yard setback line. Additionally, the applicant is seeking relief from the Section 17.16.070(B) with regard to the amount of grading disturbance area.

With respect to the request for the Variances mentioned above, the Planning Commission finds as follows:

A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.

There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The

4 property is zoned RAS-1 with OZD-1. The lot is irregular shaped with expansive street frontages along both Middleridge Road and Williamsburg Lane. Given these limitations, the front setback area is narrow and the buildable pad area is limited to the west side of Williamsburg Lane.

B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question.

The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the existing shape and terrain on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the proposed residence with the attached garage elsewhere on the property. As such, a Variance is warranted for the proposed Project.

C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed residence will be constructed on existing building pads, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, are of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that they will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.

D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed.

The granting of the variances will allow for development that is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences and will not give the property an over-built look. The proposed garage, basement/home addition and pool will improve the appearance of the property by providing required parking in the front and accessory structures in the rear of the property to enhance its livability.

E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant.

The variance does not grant special privileges for the Applicant, as the proposed residence design will provide a reasonably sized residence, and will result in a common amenity enjoyed by many other properties throughout the City. Strict application of the Zoning Code would deny the Applicant the same rights as other nearby homes as the Applicant would have less space to build than the neighboring properties. The project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan.

F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.

5 Granting variances for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.

G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.

The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures.

Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 25-115 subject to the following conditions:

A. The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections.

B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to Chapter

17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC).

C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved.

6 D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on January 27, 2026 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan.

All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.

The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.

Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in nature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commissioner after a public hearing. Applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required.

E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.

F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.

Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.

G. The person obtaining a building and/ or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.

H. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (“RHCA”).

I. The total structural coverage on the building pad shall not exceed 7,020 square feet or 12.9%.

J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 12,033 square feet, or 22.1%.

7 K. The disturbance of the net lot shall not exceed 24,185 square feet of surface area or 44.4% of the net lot area.

L. Prior to any further grading activity, the Applicant shall inform the City and RHCA staff of the date and time of this activity. Workers shall implement Best Management Practices to assure that streets and adjacent properties are not impacted.

M. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to City staff for review. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. A final inspection shall not be granted unless the slopes are vegetated.

N. The graded areas shall be landscaped and continually maintained in good condition. Any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that will not result in a hedge like screening and will not impair views from neighboring properties.

O. If applicable, the Applicant shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 13.18 of the Municipal Code.

P. The Applicant shall submit a detailed drainage plan to the City’s drainage engineer.

This project shall meet the requirements of the City’s Low Impact Development portion of the Storm Water Management and Pollution Control ordinance, if applicable. The applicant shall comply with grading requirements relative to submittal of grading and construction reports as required by the Building Official. In order to prevent sediments and water run-off from reaching the canyon from the disturbed slopes and an erosion control plan shall be submitted to the Building Department and implemented, even if grading permits have not been issued by that time.

Q. The Applicant shall secure all permits from the Department of Building and Safety prior to commencing any work. Consult with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for additional requirements.

R. Minimum of 65% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled and diverted from landfills. The hauler shall obtain a Construction and Demolition permit from the City and provide proof of recycling.

S. There shall be no discarding of any debris, trash, soil and construction spoils or any other material into the canyon or deposited anywhere on the property, including easements.

No grading, planting, structures, drainage devices or hardscape, including driveways, or storage of any objects including building materials shall take place in the easements, unless approved by the RHCA.

T. The City or the Building Department may require a construction fence for the duration of the grading for this project. Such fence shall not be located in any easement or cross over trails or natural drainage course and shall be removed immediately upon completion of the grading work.

8 U. In addition, any construction facility, such as a construction trailer/office or portable toilets, to a maximum extent practicable, shall be located in a manner not visible from the street, and be in a location satisfactory to City staff.

V. Prior to construction, an on-site inspection and site walk-through, including through all existing structures as needed, shall be scheduled with City Staff and the applicant.

W. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.

X. Construction vehicles or equipment, employees’ vehicles, delivery trucks shall not impede any traffic lanes to maximum extend practical; if traffic must be blocked in order to aid in the construction, no more than a single lane may be blocked for a short period of time and flagmen utilized on both sides of the impeded area to direct traffic.

Y. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times.

Z. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.

AA. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.

AB. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution.

AC. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank.

AD. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any.

9 AE. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan.

AF. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance approval, or the approval shall not be effective.

AG. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department.

AH. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.

AI. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.

AJ. The future stable and corral shall comply with all requirements in RHMC Sections

17.18.060 and 17.18.090, unless otherwise approved herein.

AK. New landscaping in the RHCA easement is prohibited unless previously approved by RHCA. Landscaping not approved by RHCA in the easement shall be removed from the final landscape plan.

AL. `Applicant shall effectuate a lot line adjustment between all parcels identified by APN: 7569-016-008 to make all parcels coterminous. Applicant shall submit said lot line adjustment application pursuant to RHMC Chapter 16.44. The lot line adjustment shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permit.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-02 entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NEW

CONSTRUCTION, NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND RELATED
IMPROVEMENTS; VARIANCES FOR AN ATTACHED GARAGE WITHIN
FRONT YARD, ADDITION TO HOME IN SIDE YARD, AND TO EXCEED 40 PERCENT DISTURBANCE; AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 2 WILLIAMSBURG LANE (PAESANO) (LOTS 44, 45, & 46-A-RH)
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 27, 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Douglass, Kirkpatrick, Chair Chelf
NOES:

ABSENT: Cardenas, Soo
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:

Administrative Offices.
11

P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California
ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:31 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m
T.0

SHEET INDEX
A.1.d
A.2
A.3
A.4
A.5
A.6

WALL DEMO PLAN/ORIGINAL ROOF PLAN

BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN

EAST (FRONT) ELEVATION

WEST (REAR) AND NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS

ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS
T.O TITLE SHEET

PROJECT DATA
C.0
C.1
C.2

COVER SHEET/ OVERALL SITE PLAN

EXISTING AND PROPOSED AREAS

CONCEPT GRADING PLAN

CIVIL ENGINEERING SHEETS
LP.1

PLANTING PLAN

LANDSCAPING SHEETS
DATE: 1/8/2026 tbd
TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 54,525 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 54,525
RESIDENCE 3,100 sq.ft 900 sq.ft 4,000 sq.ft
GARAGE 540 sq.ft 165 sq.ft 705 sq.ft
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 490 sq.ft 285 sq.ft 775 sq.ft
POOL EQUIPMENT 75 sq.ft -15 sq.ft 60 sq.ft
GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
CABANA 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
365 sq.ft 85 sq.ft 450 sq.ft
RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 0 sq.ft 130 sq.ft 130 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
ATTACHED TRELLISES 230 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 230 sq.ft
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 110 sq.ft 110 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 120 sq.ft 120 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 16 sq.ft 16 sq.ft
SERVICE YARD 117 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 117 sq.ft
OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
BASEMENT AREA: 0 sq.ft 1,150 sq.ft 1,150 sq.ft
(Volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT 0 sq.ft 10 ft 10 ft
TOTAL STRUCTURE 4,917 sq.ft 1,796 sq.ft 6,713 sq.ft
%STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 9.02% sq.ft 3.29% sq.ft 12.31% sq.ft

TOTAL STRUCTURES
4,917 sq.ft 1,550 sq.ft 6,467 sq.ft
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 9.02% sq.ft 2.84% sq.ft 11.86% sq.ft 2 Williamsburg Ln.

EXCLUDING UP TO 5 AND UP TO 800 sq.ft.
detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft.

ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE,

BREEZEWAYS
STABLE (dirt volume to be
included in grading quantities

EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING CASE NO.: ADDRESS:

ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN

CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE

OUTDOOR KITCHEN

CHICKEN COOP
DATE: 1/8/2026 tbd
TOTAL
PRIMARY DRIVEWAY 1,550 sq.ft 100 sq.ft 1,650 sq.ft
1,540 sq.ft -240 sq.ft 1,300 sq.ft
POOL DECKING 800 sq.ft 900 sq.ft 1,700 sq.ft
0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft
TOTAL FLATWORK 3,890 sq.ft 760 sq.ft 4,650 sq.ft

7.13% 1.39% 8.53%
8,807 sq.ft 2,556 sq.ft 11,363 sq.ft

16.15% 4.69% 20.84%
8,807 sq.ft 2,310 sq.ft 11,117 sq.ft

16.15% 4.24% 20.39%
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 23,800 sq.ft 385 sq.ft 24,185 sq.ft % DISTURBED AREA 43.65% 0.71% 44.36%
GRADING QUANTITY 1,433 C.Y.
(include future stable, corral, and
access way; basement and all other
areas to be graded)
*Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fireplace, etc. are not counted towards coverage and disturbed area unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq.ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property.
%TOTAL COVERAGE

TOTAL STRUCTURAL &

FLATWORK COVERAGE
Excl. the allowance of up to 5- 800 sq.ft.
structures from previous page.
% TOTAL COVERAGE

PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS,

COURTYARDS

OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD

EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS
%TOTAL FLATWORK

COVERAGE

TOTAL STRUCTURAL &

FLATWORK COVERAGE
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.

EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING CASE NO.: ADDRESS: 2 Williamsburg Ln.

ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN

'
'
Δ=6° 30' 42"
30 30 60
30 :,//,$06%85*/$1(
52//,1*+,//6&$

6&$/(
 

+0&':1(5*''65
18'4#..5+6'2.#0
6&$/(
 

8+%+0+6;/#2
.')'0&
#%410;/5
1235
ENGINEERING CORP.

Planning Submittal 1/8/2026 &
9+..+#/5$74).#0'
/+&&.'4+&)'41#&
'ZKUVKPI4GUKFGPEG 0GY)CTCIG
5+6'&#6#

'
5VCDNG

'
'
/HJHQG
20 20 40
20 6&$/(
 

':+56+0)%10&+6+105
ENGINEERING CORP.

Planning Submittal 1/8/2026 &
6&$/(
 

241215'&%10&+6+105
9+..+#/5$74).#0'
9+..+#/5$74).#0'
20 20 40
20

/HJHQG*UDGLQJ3ODQ
'
'
ENGINEERING CORP.

Planning Submittal 1/8/2026 &
10 10 20
10 6&$/(
 

24'.+/+0#4;)4#&+0)2.#0
9+..+#/5$74).#0'
'ZKUVKPI4GUKFGPEG 0GY)CTCIG

'
5VCDNG
2TQRQUGF$CUGOGPV
2TQRQUGF2QQN
:$//+(,*+7&20387$7,21
($57+:25.(67,0$7(
20 20 40
20 6&$/(
 

'#46*914-':*+$+6

2 %JKEMGP%QQR

3(5(11,$/

6+58%6

(526,21&21752/0,;

1(3(7$;)$$66(1,,
:$/.(5
6/2:

:DONHU
V/RZ&DWPLQW
$50(5,$0$5,7,0$
7KULIW6HDSLQN
/$9$1'8/$672(&+$6
277248$67

6SDQLVK/DYHQGHU
5260$5,1862)),&,1$/,6,5(1(
7UDLOLQJ%OXH5RVHPDU\
$1'
$1'
$1'





(6&+6&+2/=,$&$/,)251,&$
&DOLIRUQLD3RSS\
)(678&$,'$+2(16,6
,GDKR)HVFXH
)(678&$2&&,'(17$/,6
:HVWHUQ0RNHOXPQH)HVFXH
/83,1861$186
6N\/XSLQH
6,6<5,1&+,80%(//80
%OXH(\HG*UDVV
$1'
)281'6 :5&(
$73/%(*,1&859(
$6680('(/(9 

:,//,$06%85*/$1(
33 (
33 (;,67,1*5,'*( 
(;,67,1*)) 
(;,67,1*21(6725<5(6,'(1&(
68%-(&73523(57<

(



(







5+&$($6(

5+&$($6(

(




5+&$($6(

(



1 


1 


(





5+&$($6(

5+&$($6(



(
%$51
725(0$,1
352-(&77,7/(
6+((77,7/(
&+(&.('

'5$:1%<

'$7(

5(9,6,216
352-(&712
6+((71
;5()),/(

6&$/(

(PDLO
GHE#ULFKLHEUD\FRP



?9>?;4ÿF8L3 C95
/$1'6&$3($5&+,7(&785(

6LOYHU6SXU5RDG

5ROOLQJ+LOOV(VWDWHV&$

/3

3/$17,1*3/$1
 

3$(6$125(6,'(1&(
:,//,$06%85*/$1(
52//,1*+,//6&$

52//,1*+,//6/27

0%

$31

(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1 (;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1
(;9(*(
(;9(*( (;9(*(
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,21
725(0$,1

(
2/,9(75((

(
0$*12/,$75((

(
67$50$*12/,$75((
(526,21
&21752/
0,;
(526,21
&21752/
0,;
(526,21
&21752/
0,;

1 3(%%/(

1 3(%%/(

1 3(%%/(
1 3(%%/(

1 3(%%/(
1 3(%%/(
127(

x *5281'&29(563/$17(')520
1856(5<)/$760867+$9($1$9(5$*(
7+,&.1(662),1&+6
x 08/&+7+,&.1(66$1'&29(5$*(
0867%(0$,17$,1(')257+(/,)(2)
7+(3/$17,1*
3/$17,1*127(6

x 5(&,5&8/$7,1*:$7(56<67(066+$//%(
86(')25:$7(5)($785(6
x $0,1,080,1&+/$<(52)08/&+6+$//
%($33/,('21$//(;326('62,/685)$&(6
2)3/$17,1*$5($6(;&(37785)$5($6
&5((3,1*255227,1**5281'&29(56
25',5(&76((',1*$33/,&$7,216:+(5(
08/&+,6&2175$,1',&$7('
x )2562,//(667+$125*$1,&0$77(5
,17+(723,1&+(62)62,/&203267$7
$5$7(2)$0,1,0802))285&8%,&
<$5'63(5648$5()((72)
3(50($%/($5($6+$//%(,1&25325$7('
72$'(37+2)6,;,1&+(6,1727+(62,/

1 63$

1 ,1),1,7<322/

1 *$5$*(

1 322/
$5($
(48,3

(
&,758675((
3527(&7,13/$&(
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
(;,67,1*9(*(
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*9(*(
725(0$,1
(;,67,1*
9(*(7$7,2172
5(0$,1
550 s.f.

CORRAL
85 s.f.

STABLE

SET-ASIDE

EXISTING STABLE ACCESS DRIVEWAY

POTENTIAL ATV PARK'G

POTENTIAL ATV PARK'G

POTENTIAL ATV PARK'G

POTENTIAL ATV PARK'G
6'-0"
ACCESS
ACCESS
6'-0"

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:32 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m
A.1d
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

E X I S T I N G R O O F P L A N
(E)
GARAGE
(E)

BEDROOM
(E)

BEDROOM
(E)
BATH
(E)
BATH
(E)

FAMILY ROOM
(E)

LIVING ROOM
(E)

DINING ROOM
(E)

KITCHEN
(E)

LAUNDRY
(E)
POWDER
(E)
OFFICE
(E)
ENTRY
(E)

MASTER BEDROOM
(E)

MASTER CLOSET
(E)

MASTER BATH

6.33'

16.33'

6.42'

36.33'

19.92'

9.42'

20.92'

19.33'

29.83'

22.75' 36.63'

8.67'

16.54'

2.67'

17.29'

2.00'

1.42'

30.17'

9.21'

16.58'

4.17'

19.75'

4.33'
226.55

REMAINING
357.01 TOTAL LINEAR FEET OF EXTERIOR WALLS
130.46 / 357.01

36.54 % DEMOLISHED

19.92 36.33

6.42 16.33

9.42 20.92

19.33 29.83

36.63 22.75

8.67 6.33

2.67 16.54

2.00 1.42

17.29 30.17

9.21 4.33

16.58 4.17

19.75 130.46

DEMOLISHED
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

E X I S T I N G F L O O R P L A N & E X T E R I O R W A L L D E M O L I T I O N P L A N

EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN
LEGEND
=
= REMOVED WALLS
PITCH
BREAK
RIDGE
RIDGE
RIDGE
RIDGE
RIDGE
RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
RIDGE
PITCH
BREAK
PITCH
BREAK
11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12 11 : 12
11 : 12 11 : 12
11 : 12 11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12
11 : 12
VALLEY
± 4 : 12
± 4 1/2 : 12
± 4 1/2 : 12

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:32 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S R I T Z K A T & J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m
UP (16)
HEAT

PUMP AIR

HANDLER
HEAT

PUMP AIR

HANDLER
80-GAL.

HWH
BENCH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH
STEAM
SHOWER
LOW
VOLT.

RACK LOUVERED
BENCH
80-GAL.

HWH
PELOTON 24" x 60"
PELOTON TREAD 68" x 33"
24" x 68"

YOGA MAT
F-18 SIMULATOR

TV WALL
HEAT

PUMP AIR

HANDLER
GYM

STORAGE
A.2
N
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

B A S E M E N T L E V E L F L O O R P L A N RETAINING WALL

NEW STUD WALLS

EXISTING WALLS

VENEER / MASONRY
= REMOVED WALLS ====
LEGEND
MECH. ROOM
12'-2" x 16'-11"
REC. ROOM
(GYM / F-18 / THEATRE)
24'-10" x 28'-8"

STORAGE
5'-7" x 6'-3"
BATH #5
11'-2" x 6'-3"
UP (16)

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:32 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m
(E) BUILT-IN
4'-6" x 10'-6"
TABLE
DW
TRASH

RECYCLE
48" RANGE

OVENS BELOW
36" REF.

MICRO
(E)
FP
(E)
FP

TV WALL
39" x 96"
COUCH
39" x 96"
COUCH

ART WALL
(N) HEAT PUMP

ART WALL

ART WALL

QUEEN BED

TV WALL
BENCH
BENCH
36" FRZ.

QUEEN BED

TV WALL
BENCH

QUEEN BED

GALLERY WALL

TV WALL

SHELVES

DRAWERS
MIRROR
SHOES/

SHELVES
SHOES/

SHELVES

UNDERCOUNTER
WASHER

UNDERCOUNTER
DRYER
DW
TRASH

RECYCLE
36" REF. TALL CAB.

DBL
TALL CAB. OVEN
BENCH

BOOKSHELVES / BUILT-IN STORAGE

DESK / BUILT-IN

DESK / BUILT-IN

LINEN /

STORAGE

ART WALL

UNDERCOUNTER
WASHER

UNDERCOUNTER

DRYER STEAM
CLOSET
DOG
WASH

CALIFORNIA KING
46" ISOKERN
BVETTO
GAS FP
TV ABOVE F.P.

ART WALLART WALL
MIRROR
BENCH

SHELVES /

DRAWERS

GALLERY WALL

SHELVES /

DRAWERS

SHELVES /

DRAWERS
VANITY
LINEN
SHELF
BENCH
BENCH

NICHE NICHE
66" x 32" TUB

SHELVESSHELVES
STOOL
HIDDEN

STORAGE
36" FARM

WET BAR

JEEP WRANGLER
RUBICON 392

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH

1.28 GAL./
FLUSH
8'-3" x 6"-6"
ISLAND

SHELVES /

DRAWERS LINEN

GMC YUKON

DENALI XL

STORAGE / WORK BENCH

GOLF CART / UTV
A.3
N
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

M A I N L E V E L F L O O R P L A N RETAINING WALL

NEW STUD WALLS

EXISTING WALLS

VENEER / MASONRY
= REMOVED WALLS
=
=
=
=
LEGEND

KITCHEN
20'-5" x 12'-3"
-VAULTED

DINING ROOM
22'-3" x 15'-2"

ENTRY HALL
22'-4" x 10'-3"
-VAULTED

LIVING ROOM
24'-5" x 22'-2"
-VAULTED

COVERED FRONT PORCH
22'-4" x 5'-0"
DN (16)

DIRTY KITCHEN / MUDROOM
18'-9" x 10'-7"
BEDROOM #3
12'-4" x 19'-10"
BATH #3
6'-0" x 11'-2"
BATH #4
9'-8" x 9'-0"
BEDROOM #4
17'-11" x 11'-0"
BEDROOM #2
BATH #2 15'-10" x 12'-3"
5'-6" x 9'-9"
POWDER #1
3'-8" x 8'-11"

LAUNDRY
12'-6" x 13'-1"
MASTER
CLOSET
10'-0" x 15'-3"

MASTER BEDROOM
19'-5" x 19'-10"
-VAULTED
MASTER

BATHROOM
15'-2" x 15'-3"
MASTER
CLOSET
5'-7" x 8'-10"
POWDER #2
W.I.C.
5'-6" x 5'-8"
W.I.C.
5'-6" x 5'-0"
W.I.C.
9'-8" x 5'-0"

DOG DOOR
BELOW

THREE CAR GARAGE
32'-6" x 22'-8"
TRASH
YARD
135'-5" 5'-2"
36'-4" 16'-8" 22'-6 1/2" 21'-3" 18'-11 1/2" 19'-8"
4'-2" 6'-8" 2'-4" 2'-10" 4'-9" 5'-5" 3'-5" 2'-11" 3'-10" 8'-4" 8'-4" 3'-5 1/4" 7'-10" 7'-10" 3'-5 1/4" 10'-7 1/2" 10'-7 1/2" 3'-3 1/4" 6'-2 1/2" 6'-2 1/2" 3'-3 1/4" 4'-1" 2'-5" 3'-4" 5'-9" 4'-1" 1'-0" 5'-0" 17'-10" 6'-4" 33'-0"
6'-3" 10'-4" 10'-4"
4'-9" 13'-1"
6'-1"
40'-7" 6'-5"
3'-6 1/2" 7'-11 1/2" 4'-4" 4'-6" 2'-3" 2'-3" 15'-9"
4'-9" 6'-9" 30'-2"
1'-0" 22'-10" 6'-4" 3'-2 1/2" 3'-6 1/2"
135'-5"
2'-0" 6'-1 1/2" 20'-3" 17'-6" 22'-5" 30'-6" 36'-7 1/2"
3'-7" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-10" 3'-7 1/2" 3'-7" 2'-1" 2'-1" 6'-8" 6'-8" 5'-10" 6'-0" 6'-0" 4'-7" 3'-2" 8'-4 1/2" 6'-4" 6'-4" 6'-3 1/2" 2'-0" 3'-11" 9'-11" 10'-11 1/2" 9'-10" 30'-2" ± 22'-0" CLR. ± 17'-0" CLR.

DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:33 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S R I T Z K A T & J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m
A.4

TO ROOF
BELOW

TO ROOF
BELOW
9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
443.78
T.O. CHIMNEY
451.19

RIDGE ELEV
444.87
T.O. CHIMNEY
447.87

RIDGE ELEV
445.03

RIDGE ELEV
444.65

RIDGE ELEV
444.65

RIDGE ELEV
446.75
9 : 12
9 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
446.75
9 : 12
9 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12
9 : 12
9 : 12
3 : 12
3 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
444.87

RIDGE ELEV
444.65

RIDGE ELEV
448.19
9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12
9 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
444.87
9 : 12
3 : 12

TO ROOF
BELOW
9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
443.97
9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12 9 : 12
3 : 12
9 : 12 9 : 12
3 : 12

RIDGE ELEV
443.97
9 : 12 9 : 12
3 : 12
N
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "
R O O F P L A N 3 : 12
PITCH
BREAK

PITCH BREAK
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
DS
PITCH
BREAK
PITCH
BREAK
PITCH
BREAK
PITCH
BREAK 3 : 12
DS
PITCH
BREAK
DS DS
DS
DS
PITCH
BREAK

PITCH BREAK

ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF:
2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274

J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O
1/12/26, 11:33 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m

TWO WILLIAMSBURG LANE

TWO WILLIAMSBURG LANE
A.5
S C A L E : 3 / 16 " = 1 ' - 0 "

F U L L E A S T ( F R O N T - W I L L I A M S B U R G L A N E ) E L E V A T I O N -- R E D U C E D S C A L E F O R C O N T E X T S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

P A R T I A L E A S T ( F R O N T - W I L L I A M S B U R G L A N E ) E L E V A T I O N (E) FF = 427.80 8'-6"
10'-0"
PLATE
10'-0"
PLATE
± 7'-3 1/2"

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 443.78

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 448.19

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
T.O. CURB = 427.73
8'-6" ± 7'-5 3/4"

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 443.97

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

P A R T I A L E A S T ( F R O N T - W I L L I A M S B U R G L A N E ) E L E V A T I O N

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 444.65

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80
(E) FF = 427.80
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
(E) FF = 427.80
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
16'-0"

DORMER PLATE
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 451.19

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 446.75

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 445.03
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 447.87
T.O. FINISHED RIDGE
ELEV. = 444.87

20.39' PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT

LINE OF EXISTING ROOF

LINE OF EXISTING ROOF

LINE OF EXISTING ROOF

THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

UNLESS THEY ARE STAMPED

BY ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OR HAVE "PERMIT SET"

PRINTED ON THEM IN THE

SPACE ABOVE
1/12/26, 11:34 AM
No. Date

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION

A R C H I T E C T
3 0 6 V I S T A D E L M A R, S U I T E A

R E D O N D O B E A C H ,
C A L I F O R N I A 9 0 2 7 7
M I L E S E . P R I T Z K A T

A R C H I T E C T
K E I T H B . J O H N S O N
3 1 0 . 3 7 5 . 7 7 0 0
P

A R C H I T E C T S

R I T Z K A T
& J O H N S O N
www.pritzkatjohnson.com
i n f o @ p r i t z k a t j o h n s o n . c o m ADDITION & REMODEL TO THE RESIDENCE OF: 2 Williamsburg Lane Rolling Hills California 90274 J O H N & W E N D Y P A E S A N O A.6
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

P A R T I A L W E S T ( R E A R ) E L E V A T I O N
(E) FF = 427.80 8'-6"
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

S O U T H E L E V A T I O N
(E) FF = 427.80 8'-6" MASTER BEDROOM PLATE 1'-0" 9'-1" BASEMENT PLATE FF = 417.72
T.O. SLAB = 417.65
(E) FF = 427.80
8'-6" ± 8'-2"

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 444.65
8'-6"
PLATE
8'-6"
PLATE
(E) FF = 427.80
8'-6"

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 444.87
± 8'-4 1/2"

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
8'-2"
PLATE
8'-6"
PLATE
(E) FF = 427.80
10'-0"

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 445.03
± 7'-0 1/2"

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 444.87 ± 8'-4 1/2"

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
± 9'-0"

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 443.97

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 448.19

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 448.19

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 448.19

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
T.O. CURB = 427.73 8'-6" ± 7'-5 3/4"

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

P A R T I A L W E S T ( R E A R ) E L E V A T I O N
8'-2"
PLATE
8'-6"
PLATE
S C A L E : 1 / 4 " = 1 ' - 0 "

N O R T H E L E V A T I O N

TOP OF SHEATHING
FINISH ELEV = 443.97

FINISH MATERIAL

ALLOWANCE
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 451.19
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 447.87
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80
T.O. FINISHED RIDGE
ELEV. = 444.65
T.O. FINISHED RIDGE
ELEV. = 446.75
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 451.19
T.O. FINISHED RIDGE
ELEV. = 446.75
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80
MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
21'-0" MAX. HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 451.19
T.O. CHIMNEY
ELEV. = 447.87 MAX. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT = 448.80

LINE OF EXISTING ROOF

LINE OF EXISTING ROOF

Item: 12.A.

Meeting Date: 3/9/2026
To: City Council
From: Samantha Crew, Management Analyst
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Adoption of Resolution No. 1404 approving Volume 1 and the Rolling Hills portion of Volume 2 within the 2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Background:

The City of Rolling Hills adopted its previous Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) in January 2019. Under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requirements, Hazard Mitigation Plans must be reviewed, updated, and re-approved every five years. The City’s 2019 Plan reached the end of its regulatory cycle in 2024. Recognizing the approaching expiration of the 2019 Plan, the City joined other Peninsula cities in participating in a Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) update. This regional approach enables shared technical analysis and cost efficiencies, a consistent risk assessment methodology across the Peninsula, and stronger regional grant competitiveness.

Plan Adoption Timing
Staff presented the draft Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) to the Planning Commission on February 17, 2026. The Commission received and filed the item without comment and did not propose any modifications or recommendations. The presentation introduced the Commission to the regional hazard mitigation planning effort and provided an overview of the Plan’s scope, structure, and intent.

Consistent with FEMA requirements, the draft Plan was made available for a two-week public review period from February 12 through February 25, 2026 (14 calendar days). The draft was posted online and made accessible to the public, with instructions provided for submitting written comments. During this review period, no Rolling Hills–specific comments were received. One Peninsula-wide comment was submitted as follows:

Comment (2/13/2026):
“Have you done preparation for the ARkStorm scenario? In 1862, supposedly there were only hills (Palos Verdes Hill, Dominguez Hills, Signal Hill) above water in the LA Basin. The Palos Verdes Peninsula would be above water, but we should think about how we would become a refuge for many people from nearby cities.”

The ARkStorm scenario, an extreme, prolonged atmospheric river event modeled after the 1861-1862 California megaflood, is recognized as a credible regional hazard. The Peninsula cities have been awarded a Mass Care and Evacuation Planning Grant to support development of a regional mass care and evacuation framework. That planning effort is anticipated to evaluate large-scale evacuation dynamics, shelter capacity and surge considerations, critical facility readiness, transportation and access constraints, and inter-jurisdictional coordination. As the ARkStorm scenario will be examined through that regional process, Rolling Hills will have the opportunity to monitor the planning effort and consider participation, subject to future City Council direction.

The Plan is now before the City Council for discussion and consideration of adoption by resolution (Attachment A).

As advised by Black & Veatch, the City’s hazard mitigation consultant, pre-adoption of the MultiJurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) (Attachment B) allows the approval process to move forward without delay. Although the City’s prior Hazard Mitigation Plan has expired, pre-adopting the updated Plan demonstrates the City’s formal commitment to its mitigation priorities and positions the City to maintain eligibility for federal Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) funding.

The California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and FEMA require formal local adoption prior to issuing final approval. By taking action now, the City enables the State and federal review process to proceed immediately, reducing the overall approval timeline and ensuring that all participating jurisdictions remain aligned in schedule under the regional, multi-jurisdictional framework.

If Cal OES or FEMA requests minor technical revisions during their review, those changes can typically be addressed administratively and incorporated into the final approved Plan. Should substantive modifications be required, staff would return to the City Council with a resolution adopting the revised Plan.

At the Peninsula Public Safety Committee (PPSC) quarterly meeting held on February 19, the preadoption process and review timeline were discussed in detail, including the State’s 45-day review followed by FEMA Region 9’s 45-day review. Pre-adoption allows FEMA to issue final approval upon completion of agency review rather than waiting for subsequent local actions.

Living Document
The Plan is intended to function as a living document and will be reviewed and evaluated annually during the five-year planning cycle. As new hazards emerge or mitigation strategies evolve, updates may be incorporated through future amendments to ensure the Plan remains current and effective.

Hazard Mitigation Planning for the Palos Verdes Peninsula Planning Area:

In May 2025, a coalition of Palos Verdes Peninsula Planning Partners initiated a coordinated effort to update a regional Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). This effort responds to federal requirements under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390), which requires local jurisdictions to maintain an adopted hazard mitigation plan in order to remain eligible for certain federal disaster mitigation funding.

The purpose of the multi-jurisdictional approach is to pool resources, align planning assumptions, and establish a consistent hazard mitigation framework across the Peninsula planning area.

Planning Partnership
The six-member Planning Partnership that participated in the development of the Plan includes:

• City of Palos Verdes Estates
• City of Rancho Palos Verdes
• City of Rolling Hills
• City of Rolling Hills Estates
• Abalone Cove Landslide Abatement District
• Klondike Canyon Geologic Hazard Abatement District
The planning area encompasses the four municipal boundaries listed above, with the two geologic hazard abatement districts participating due to their unique responsibilities related to landslide risk.

Lead Agency and Funding
The City of Rolling Hills Estates served as the lead coordinating agency for this multi-jurisdictional effort. Development of the Plan was largely funded through a reimbursable planning grant from the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), which supports emergency planning consultant services. A Memorandum of Understanding (Attachment C) outlining cost-sharing and terms for development of the Plan was approved by each participating City Council in early 2025.

Peninsula Public Safety Committee
The Peninsula Public Safety Committee (PPSC) consists of two council members from each of the four Peninsula cities and meets quarterly to discuss collaborative efforts to enhance Peninsula-wide emergency preparedness and public safety. The PPSC coordinates emergency preparedness initiatives and addresses public safety trends and issues affecting the region. The PPSC has overseen a coordinated regional effort to develop the Palos Verdes Peninsula (PVP) MultiJurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update.

At the May 23, 2024 PPSC meeting, an Ad Hoc Committee (one member from each city and the four City Managers) of the PPSC was appointed to help guide the development of the Plan, including review of consultant proposals. Following the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) in December 2024, the Ad Hoc Committee interviewed three firms and selected Black & Veatch Corporation to develop the Plan. Megan Brotherton, Hazard Mitigation and Resilience Planner from Black & Veatch, is with us, via zoom, this evening to present a plan update (Attachment D).

Council member Leah Mirsch is the appointed Ad Hoc Committee member for the City of Rolling Hills.

Oversight and Public Participation
The Plan update process was overseen by a 21-member stakeholder Planning Committee, composed of representatives from within the planning area, including agencies such as the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District, Palos Verdes Library District, local utilities, senior service organizations, and Rolling Hills Community Association staff. Public participation was incorporated throughout the process and included:
• In-person outreach events
• A community survey conducted in late 2025 and early 2026 • Web-based information and updates
• Progress updates through PVPready.gov and participating agencies’ communication channels; and
• Blue Newsletter

Hazards Addressed
The Plan includes hazard identification and profiling for natural hazards of significance within the Palos Verdes Peninsula planning area, including:
• Drought
• Earthquake
• Flood (inland flooding, coastal flooding, sea-level rise, tsunami, and coastal erosion) • Heat Wave
• Landslide
• Strong Wind
• Wildfire
The Plan was prepared in accordance with Cal OES Local Hazard Mitigation Plan requirements and FEMA Region 9 guidelines.

Discussion:

Staff is now bringing the MJHMP before the City Council for adoption by resolution.

Plan Adoption and Next Steps
The Planning Partnership elected to utilize a FEMA-authorized provision that allows jurisdictions to adopt the Plan prior to Cal OES and FEMA approval.

Each participating jurisdiction will adopt Volume 1 of the Plan, which serves as the base multijurisdictional document, along with its respective jurisdiction-specific annex in Volume 2. Following adoption by all Planning Partners, the Plan will be submitted to Cal OES and FEMA for final review and approval. Once approved, the City would be eligible to pursue funding opportunities available through FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) programs in the future, should the need arise.

Pre-adoption Schedule:

City Pre-Adoption Date (Item before
City Council)
Rolling Hills Estates March 2, 2026 (approved)
Rolling Hills March 9, 2026
Rancho Palos Verdes March 17, 2026
Palos Verdes Estates March 24, 2026
Following the Pre-adoption by all four cities, the Plan will be transmitted to Cal OES. They will review it during a 45-day period. Following that, a technical assistance meeting will be scheduled with the City's planning consultants.

Fiscal Impact:

Black and Veatch overall cost proposal: $250,672
Cal OES/FEMA grant funding - 75%
Peninsula responsibility - 25%
Fiscal impact per city is as follows:

Cost Allocation Formula:

City Percentage Cost
Share
Palos Verdes Estates 20% $12,533.60
Rancho Palos Verdes 60% $37,600.80
Rolling Hills 7% $4,386.79
Rolling Hills Estates 13% $8,146.84
To Date:

PVP City Total Cost: $22,152.38
Rolling Hills Cost at 7%: $1,550.67
Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council consider adopting Resolution No. 1404 approving Volume I and the Rolling Hills portion of Volume II of the 2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Attachments:

1. Attachment A - ResolutionNo1404_MJHMP_Adoption_F

2. Attachment B - PL_HMP_260225_PVP_MJHMP_Volume1&2_D

3. Attachment C - CA_MOU_250203_PVP_JointHMP_F_E

4. Attachment D - MA_HMP_AD_260309_MJHMP_B&V_PP

Resolution No. 1404 1
RESOLUTION NO. 1404

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2026 PALOS VERDES

PENINSULA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, all of the Palos Verdes Peninsula has exposure to natural hazards that increase the risk to life, property, environment, and the local economy; and WHEREAS, pro-active mitigation of known hazards before a disaster event can reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life and property; and
WHEREAS, The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) established new requirements for pre- and post-disaster hazard mitigation programs; and WHEREAS, a coalition of Palos Verdes Peninsula stakeholders with like planning objectives has been formed to pool resources and create consistent mitigation strategies to be implemented within each partners identified capabilities, within the Palos Verdes Peninsula Planning Area; and WHEREAS, the coalition has completed a planning process that engages the public, assesses the risk and vulnerability to the impacts of natural hazards, develops a mitigation strategy consistent with a set of uniform goals and objectives, and creates a plan for implementing, evaluating, and revising this strategy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS

1.) Adopts in its entirety, Volume I, Areawide Information, and Volume II, Planning Partner Annexes of the 2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference.

2.) Will use the adopted and approved portions of the Hazard Mitigation Plan to guide pre- and post- disaster mitigation of the hazards identified.

3.) Will coordinate the strategies identified in the Hazard Mitigation Plan with other planning programs and mechanisms under its jurisdictional authority.

4.) Will continue its support of the on-going areawide mitigation efforts and continue to participate in the Planning Partnership as described by the Hazard Mitigation Plan.

5.) Will help to promote and support the mitigation successes of all Planning Partners.

Resolution No. 1404 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23th day of February, 2026 ______________________________

BEA DIERINGER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH

CITY CLERK

Resolution No. 1404 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§

CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
The foregoing Resolution No. 1404 entitled:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2026 PALOS VERDES

PENINSULA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23th day of February 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________

CHRISTIAN HORVATH

CITY CLERK

Resolution No. 1404 4
EXHIBIT “A”
2026 Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

PALOS VERDES

PENINSULA
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
2026

PUBLIC COMMENT DRAFT
FEBRUARY 2026
Volume 1
Areawide Information

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................1 Hazard Mitigation Overview .........................................................................................................................1 Building the Planning Teams........................................................................................................................2 Outreach Strategy .........................................................................................................................................2 Risk Assessment...........................................................................................................................................3 Capability Assessment .................................................................................................................................2 Mitigation Strategy........................................................................................................................................2 Implementing, Adopting, and Maintaining the Plan....................................................................................5 Part 1 6
Introduction and Planning Process .................................................................................................................6

1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Why Prepare This Plan? ................................................................................................................1-1

1.1.1 Federal Eligibility .....................................................................................................................1-2

1.1.2 Purposes for Planning ............................................................................................................1-3

1.2 Plan Updates..................................................................................................................................1-3

1.2.1 Previous Plans.........................................................................................................................1-3

1.2.2 Why Update .............................................................................................................................1-3

1.2.3 The Updated Plan - What Has Changed? ..............................................................................1-5

1.3 How to Use This Plan ....................................................................................................................1-5

1.3.1 Volume 1..................................................................................................................................1-5

1.3.2 Volume 2..................................................................................................................................1-5

1.3.3 Planning Requirement Icons ..................................................................................................1-6

2. Planning Process...............................................................................................................................2-1

2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................2-1

2.2 Defining the Planning Area..........................................................................................................2-12

2.3 Funding.........................................................................................................................................2-12

2.4 Formation of the Planning Teams..............................................................................................2-13

2.4.1 Core Planning Team .............................................................................................................2-13

2.4.2 Planning Committee .............................................................................................................2-13

2.4.3 Planning Partnership ............................................................................................................2-14

2.5 Stakeholder Coordination and Involvement...............................................................................2-16

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents ii

2.5.1 Types of Stakeholders ..........................................................................................................2-16

2.5.2 Stakeholder Participation .....................................................................................................2-17

2.5.3 Draft Plan Review..................................................................................................................2-18

2.6 Public Participation .....................................................................................................................2-18

2.6.1 Hazard Mitigation Plan Web Page.......................................................................................2-19

2.6.2 Public Meetings.....................................................................................................................2-19

2.6.3 Public Events .........................................................................................................................2-19

2.6.4 Public Survey .........................................................................................................................2-21

2.6.5 Public Review Period ............................................................................................................2-22

2.7 Identification and Outreach to Equity Priority Communities ....................................................2-22

2.8 Review and Incorporation of Existing Programs .......................................................................2-22

2.9 Plan Development Milestones ....................................................................................................2-23

3. Palos Verdes Peninsula Profile ........................................................................................................3-1

3.1 Overview.........................................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.1 Historical Overview .................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.2 Jurisdictions............................................................................................................................3-1

3.1.3 Government.............................................................................................................................3-1

3.2 Physical Setting .............................................................................................................................3-2

3.2.1 Location ...................................................................................................................................3-2

3.2.2 Geography and Topography...................................................................................................3-2

3.2.3 Watersheds and Surface Waters ...........................................................................................3-2

3.2.4 Climate.....................................................................................................................................3-4

3.3 Population and Demographics .....................................................................................................3-4

3.3.1 General Population..................................................................................................................3-4

3.3.2 Equity Priority Communities...................................................................................................3-5

3.4 Development Profile ......................................................................................................................3-5

3.4.1 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................3-5

3.4.2 General Building Stock............................................................................................................3-7

3.5 Community Lifelines......................................................................................................................3-7

3.5.1 Safety and Security .................................................................................................................3-8

3.5.2 Food, Hydration, Shelter .........................................................................................................3-8

3.5.3 Health and Medical .................................................................................................................3-8

3.5.4 Energy ......................................................................................................................................3-8

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents iii

3.5.5 Communication.......................................................................................................................3-9

3.5.6 Transportation.........................................................................................................................3-9

3.5.7 Hazardous Materials...............................................................................................................3-9

3.5.8 Water Systems ........................................................................................................................3-9

3.6 Economy.........................................................................................................................................3-9

3.6.1 Industry, Businesses, and Institutions...................................................................................3-9 Part 2 12
Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................12

4. Hazards of Concern ..........................................................................................................................4-1

4.1 What Is a Hazard of Concern? ......................................................................................................4-1

4.2 Federal Disaster Declarations.......................................................................................................4-1

4.3 Natural Hazards of Concern and Hazards of Interest.................................................................4-2

5. Risk Assessment Methodology and Tools ......................................................................................5-1

5.1 Assessing Risk...............................................................................................................................5-1

5.2 Risk Assessment Tools.................................................................................................................5-1

5.2.1 Mapping...................................................................................................................................5-1

5.2.2 Modeling ..................................................................................................................................5-1

5.3 Risk Assessment Approach..........................................................................................................5-3

5.4 Sources of Data Used in Risk Assessment..................................................................................5-4

5.4.1 Building and Cost Data ...........................................................................................................5-4

5.4.2 Community Lifelines ...............................................................................................................5-4

5.4.3 Population................................................................................................................................5-4

5.4.4 Hazus Data Inputs...................................................................................................................5-4

5.4.5 Other Local Hazard Data ........................................................................................................5-5

5.4.6 Data Source Summary............................................................................................................5-5

5.5 Data Limitations.............................................................................................................................5-6

6. Drought...............................................................................................................................................6-1

6.1 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................................6-1

6.1.1 Description of the Hazard.......................................................................................................6-1

6.1.2 Location ...................................................................................................................................6-3

6.1.3 Extent .......................................................................................................................................6-3

6.1.4 Previous Occurrences.............................................................................................................6-5

6.1.5 Future Conditions....................................................................................................................6-7

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents iv

6.2 Vulnerability Assessment .............................................................................................................6-8

6.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .......................................................................................................6-8

6.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .........................................................................................6-9

6.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock..........................................................................................6-9

6.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines .............................................................................................6-9

6.2.5 Impact on the Economy..........................................................................................................6-9

6.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................6-10

6.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources..................................................................6-10

6.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ...........................................6-10

6.3 Mitigation Opportunities .............................................................................................................6-10

7. Earthquake .........................................................................................................................................7-1

7.1 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................................7-1

7.1.1 Description of the Hazard.......................................................................................................7-1

7.1.2 Location ...................................................................................................................................7-3

7.1.3 Extent .......................................................................................................................................7-6

7.1.4 Previous Occurrences.............................................................................................................7-8

7.1.5 Future Conditions..................................................................................................................7-11

7.2 Vulnerability Assessment ...........................................................................................................7-13

7.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .....................................................................................................7-13

7.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .......................................................................................7-13

7.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock........................................................................................7-14

7.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines ...........................................................................................7-15

7.2.5 Impact on the Economy........................................................................................................7-16

7.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................7-16

7.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources..................................................................7-16

7.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ...........................................7-17

7.3 Mitigation Opportunities .............................................................................................................7-17

8. Flood...................................................................................................................................................8-1

8.1 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................................8-1

8.1.1 Description of the Hazard.......................................................................................................8-1

8.1.2 National Flood Insurance Program Participation .................................................................8-5

8.1.3 Location ...................................................................................................................................8-5

8.1.4 Extent .....................................................................................................................................8-10

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents v

8.1.5 Previous Occurrences...........................................................................................................8-13

8.1.6 Future Conditions..................................................................................................................8-15

8.2 Vulnerability Assessment ...........................................................................................................8-18

8.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .....................................................................................................8-18

8.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .......................................................................................8-18

8.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock........................................................................................8-20

8.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines ...........................................................................................8-21

8.2.5 Impact on the Economy........................................................................................................8-22

8.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................8-22

8.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources..................................................................8-22

8.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ...........................................8-23

8.3 Mitigation Opportunities .............................................................................................................8-23

9. Heat Wave..........................................................................................................................................9-1

9.1 Hazard Profile ................................................................................................................................9-1

9.1.1 Description of the Hazard.......................................................................................................9-1

9.1.2 Location ...................................................................................................................................9-2

9.1.3 Extent .......................................................................................................................................9-2

9.1.4 Previous Occurrences.............................................................................................................9-4

9.1.5 Future Conditions....................................................................................................................9-6

9.2 Vulnerability Assessment .............................................................................................................9-7

9.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .......................................................................................................9-7

9.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .........................................................................................9-7

9.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock..........................................................................................9-7

9.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines .............................................................................................9-7

9.2.5 Impact on the Economy..........................................................................................................9-8

9.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ..........................................................................9-8

9.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources....................................................................9-8

9.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs .............................................9-8

9.3 Mitigation Opportunities ...............................................................................................................9-8

10. Landslide..........................................................................................................................................10-1

10.1 Hazard Profile ..............................................................................................................................10-1

10.1.1 Description of the Hazard.....................................................................................................10-1

10.1.2 Location .................................................................................................................................10-3

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents vi

10.1.3 Extent .....................................................................................................................................10-4

10.1.4 Previous Occurrences...........................................................................................................10-7

10.1.5 Future Conditions............................................................................................................... 10-12

10.2 Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................................................................ 10-13

10.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .................................................................................................. 10-13

10.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .................................................................................... 10-13

10.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock..................................................................................... 10-14

10.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines ........................................................................................ 10-14

10.2.5 Impact on the Economy..................................................................................................... 10-15

10.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ..................................................................... 10-15

10.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources............................................................... 10-15

10.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ........................................ 10-16

10.3 Mitigation Opportunities .......................................................................................................... 10-17

11. Strong Wind .....................................................................................................................................11-1

11.1 Hazard Profile ..............................................................................................................................11-1

11.1.1 Description of the Hazard.....................................................................................................11-1

11.1.2 Location .................................................................................................................................11-3

11.1.3 Extent .....................................................................................................................................11-3

11.1.4 Previous Occurrences...........................................................................................................11-4

11.1.5 Future Conditions..................................................................................................................11-6

11.2 Vulnerability Assessment ...........................................................................................................11-7

11.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .....................................................................................................11-7

11.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .......................................................................................11-7

11.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock........................................................................................11-7

11.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines ...........................................................................................11-7

11.2.5 Impact on the Economy........................................................................................................11-8

11.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ........................................................................11-8

11.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources..................................................................11-8

11.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ...........................................11-8

11.3 Mitigation Opportunities .............................................................................................................11-8

12. Wildfire .............................................................................................................................................12-1

12.1 Hazard Profile ..............................................................................................................................12-1

12.1.1 Description of the Hazard.....................................................................................................12-1

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents vii

12.1.2 Location .................................................................................................................................12-4

12.1.3 Extent .....................................................................................................................................12-5

12.1.4 Previous Occurrences...........................................................................................................12-7

12.1.5 Future Conditions..................................................................................................................12-9

12.2 Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................................................................ 12-10

12.2.1 Summary of Vulnerability .................................................................................................. 12-10

12.2.2 Impact on Life, Health, and Safety .................................................................................... 12-11

12.2.3 Impact on General Building Stock..................................................................................... 12-12

12.2.4 Impact on Community Lifelines ........................................................................................ 12-15

12.2.5 Impact on the Economy..................................................................................................... 12-16

12.2.6 Impact on Historic and Cultural Resources ..................................................................... 12-17

12.2.7 Impact on Ecosystems and Natural Resources............................................................... 12-17

12.2.8 Change in Vulnerability Since the Prior Planning Area HMPs ........................................ 12-18

12.3 Mitigation Opportunities .......................................................................................................... 12-18

13. Other Hazards of Interest ...............................................................................................................13-1

13.1 Groundwater Seepage.................................................................................................................13-1

13.1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................13-1

13.1.2 Identified Groundwater Seepage .........................................................................................13-1

13.1.3 Past Events............................................................................................................................13-1

13.1.4 Location and Extent ..............................................................................................................13-1

13.2 Hazardous Materials ...................................................................................................................13-2

13.2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................13-2

13.2.2 Identified Hazardous Materials Hazards.............................................................................13-2

13.2.3 Past Events............................................................................................................................13-2

13.2.4 Location and Extent ..............................................................................................................13-3

13.3 Human-Caused ............................................................................................................................13-3

13.3.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................13-3

13.3.2 Identified Human-Caused Hazards......................................................................................13-4

13.3.3 Past Events............................................................................................................................13-5

13.3.4 Location and Extent ..............................................................................................................13-6

13.4 Utility Related ...............................................................................................................................13-6

13.4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................13-6

13.4.2 Identified Utility Related Hazards.........................................................................................13-6

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents viii

13.4.3 Past Events............................................................................................................................13-7

13.4.4 Location and Extent ..............................................................................................................13-8

14. Hazard Ranking ...............................................................................................................................14-1 Part 3 4
Mitigation Strategy............................................................................................................................................4

15. Mitigation Strategy ..........................................................................................................................15-1

15.1 Review of Previous Mitigation Actions ......................................................................................15-1

15.1.1 Mitigation Accomplishments Since the Prior Mitigation Planning Efforts .......................15-1

15.2 Mitigation Goals...........................................................................................................................15-2

15.3 Mitigation Alternatives ................................................................................................................15-2

15.4 Developing Mitigation Actions....................................................................................................15-3

15.5 Prioritizing Mitigation Actions ....................................................................................................15-3

15.6 Mitigation Action Categorization................................................................................................15-4

15.6.1 Local Plans and Regulations................................................................................................15-4

15.6.2 Structure and Infrastructure Projects..................................................................................15-4

15.6.3 Education and Awareness Programs ..................................................................................15-4

15.6.4 Natural Systems Protection .................................................................................................15-1

15.6.5 Climate Resiliency.................................................................................................................15-1

15.6.6 Community Capacity Building..............................................................................................15-1 Part 4 15-1
Maintaining the Plan....................................................................................................................................15-1

16. Adopting and Maintaining the Mitigation Plan..............................................................................16-1

16.1 Plan Adoption...............................................................................................................................16-1

16.2 Plan Maintenance ........................................................................................................................16-1

16.2.1 Integrating the Plan...............................................................................................................16-2

16.2.2 Implementing the Hazard Mitigation Plan Through Existing Programs ...........................16-3

16.2.3 Ongoing Public Involvement ................................................................................................16-3

16.2.4 Monitoring the Plan...............................................................................................................16-4

16.2.5 Updating the Plan..................................................................................................................16-5 Appendix A. Public Outreach ......................................................................................................................1 Appendix B. Hazard Selection ....................................................................................................................1 Appendix C. Meeting Documentation ........................................................................................................1 Appendix D. Risk Assessment Methodology.............................................................................................1

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents ix
Appendix E. Federal and State Agencies, Programs, and Regulations ...................................................1 Appendix F. Plan Maintenance Agendas...................................................................................................1 Appendix G. FEMA Approval and Planning Partner Adoption ..................................................................1

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Palos Verde Peninsula Hazard Mitigation Planning Participation .........................................2-14 Table 2-2. Federal and State Agencies.......................................................................................................2-17 Table 2-3. Public Survey Comment Examples and MJHMP Incorporation .............................................2-22 Table 2-4. Plan Development Milestones...................................................................................................2-23 Table 3-1. Recent Population by Jurisdiction ..............................................................................................3-4 Table 3-2. Vulnerable Populations Exposed to Hazard of Concern ...........................................................3-5 Table 3-3. Building Count by Occupancy Class ...........................................................................................3-7 Table 3-4. Community Lifelines in the Planning Area .................................................................................3-8 Table 3-5. Principal Employers in the Planning Area ..................................................................................3-9 Table 3-6. Employment in Planning Area by Industry Sector Percentages .............................................3-10 Table 4-1. Federal Disaster Declarations in Los Angeles County...............................................................4-1 Table 5-1. Data Source Summary .................................................................................................................5-5 Table 6-1. USDA Drought Disaster Declarations..........................................................................................6-6 Table 6-2. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Drought Hazard.........................................................6-10 Table 7-1. Mercalli Scale and Peak Ground Acceleration Comparison .....................................................7-1 Table 7-2. NEHRP Soil Classification System..............................................................................................7-3 Table 7-3. USGS Earthquake Reports ...........................................................................................................7-9 Table 7-4. Estimated Earthquake Impact on Persons and Households ..................................................7-13 Table 7-5. Age of Structures in the Palos Verdes Peninsula ....................................................................7-14 Table 7-6. Loss Estimates for Fault Scenarios ..........................................................................................7-15 Table 7-7. Estimated Earthquake-Caused Debris ......................................................................................7-15 Table 7-8. Community Lifelines in Earthquake Hazard Area ....................................................................7-16 Table 7-9. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Earthquake Hazard ...................................................7-17 Table 8-1. Riverine Flooding Sources in the Palos Verde Peninsula..........................................................8-5 Table 8-2. Riverine Flooding Sources in the Palos Verde Peninsula..........................................................8-5 Table 8-3. Acres of Floodplain in FEMA 1 Percent Annual Chance Flood Zones .....................................8-7 Table 8-4. Federal Flood Disaster Declarations.........................................................................................8-13

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents x
Table 8-5. State Landslide Disaster Declarations......................................................................................8-13 Table 8-6. USDA Drought Disaster Declarations........................................................................................8-14 Table 8-7. Recent Flood Hazard Events .....................................................................................................8-14 Table 8-8. Recurrence Intervals and Probabilities of Occurrence ............................................................8-16 Table 8-9. Exposure Estimates for Flood Hazard Areas ..........................................................................8-20 Table 8-10. Loss Estimates for 100-year Flood Hazard Areas ................................................................8-21 Table 8-11. Estimated Number of Buildings by Type, Located in the Flood Hazard Areas....................8-21 Table 8-12. Community Lifelines in Flood Hazard Areas..........................................................................8-22 Table 8-13. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Flood Hazard...........................................................8-23 Table 9-1. NWS HeatRisk Index ....................................................................................................................9-4 Table 9-2. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Heat Wave Hazard......................................................9-9 Table 10-1. Federal Landslide Disaster Declarations................................................................................10-7 Table 10-2. State Landslide Disaster Declarations ...................................................................................10-8 Table 10-3. Recent Landslide Events ...................................................................................................... 10-11 Table 10-4. Vulnerable Populations Exposed to Landslides ................................................................. 10-13 Table 10-5. Exposure Estimates for Landslide Susceptibility Areas..................................................... 10-14 Table 10-6. Estimated Number of Buildings by Type, Located in the Landslide Susceptibility Areas 10-14 Table 10-7. Community Lifelines in Deep-Seated Landslide Hazard Areas ......................................... 10-15 Table 10-8. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Landslide/Mass Movement Hazard................... 10-17 Table 11-1. Land Based Beaufort Scale .....................................................................................................11-3 Table 11-2. Federal Strong Wind Disaster Declarations ...........................................................................11-5 Table 11-3. State Strong Wind Disaster Proclamations............................................................................11-5 Table 11-4. USDA Strong Wind Disaster Declarations ..............................................................................11-5 Table 11-5. NOAA NCEI Storm Events........................................................................................................11-6 Table 11-6. General Building Stock Replacement Cost Values ................................................................11-7 Table 11-7. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Strong Wind Hazard ...............................................11-8 Table 12-1. Federal Wildfire Disaster Declarations ...................................................................................12-7 Table 12-2. State Wildfire Disaster Declarations.......................................................................................12-8 Table 12-3. Estimated Number of People Living in the FHSZs ............................................................. 12-11 Table 12-4. Vulnerable Populations Exposed to FHSZs ........................................................................ 12-12 Table 12-5. Estimated Buildings Located in FHSZs ............................................................................... 12-13 Table 12-6. Estimated Number of Buildings, by Structure Type, Located in FHSZs ............................ 12-13 Table 12-7. General Building Stock by Date of Construction................................................................. 12-15

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents xi
Table 12-8. Community Lifelines in Wildfire Severity Zones ................................................................. 12-15 Table 12-9. Estimated Replacement Cost Value of Buildings Located in the FHSZs.......................... 12-17 Table 12-10. Potential Opportunities to Mitigate the Wildfire Hazard .................................................. 12-18 Table 14-1. Priority Risk Index Scoring Criteria .........................................................................................14-2 Table 14-2. Priority Risk Index Scoring Criteria .........................................................................................14-3 Table 16-1. Plan Maintenance Matrix.........................................................................................................16-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. Hazard Mitigation Web Page ...................................................................................................2-19 Figure 2-2. Public Meeting Participation ....................................................................................................2-20 Figure 2-3. Prepared Peninsula Expo Featuring Coverage by RPVtv .......................................................2-20 Figure 2-4. Survey Promotion on RPVtv .....................................................................................................2-21 Figure 3-1. Palos Verdes Peninsula EWMP Watersheds ............................................................................3-3 Figure 3-2. Planning Area Critical Facilities .................................................................................................3-8 Figure 3-3. Recent Unemployment Rates for California and the Planning Area......................................3-11 Figure 6-1. U.S. Drought Monitor Categories ...............................................................................................6-4 Figure 6-2. Percent of Los Angeles County Affected by Drought Conditions 2000 to January 2026 .....6-7 Figure 7-1. USGS National Seismic Hazard Map.........................................................................................7-4 Figure 7-2. Fault Activity Map .......................................................................................................................7-5 Figure 7-3. Palos Verdes Peninsula NEHRP Seismic Site Class ................................................................7-6 Figure 7-4. Palos Verdes Peninsula Liquefaction Susceptibility ................................................................7-4 Figure 7-5. Compton M7.45 Scenario...........................................................................................................7-5 Figure 7-6. Palos Verdes M7.38 Scenario....................................................................................................7-6 Figure 7-7. Redondo Canyon M6.65 Scenario .............................................................................................7-7 Figure 7-8. USGS Earthquake Catalog 2019 – 2025..................................................................................7-10 Figure 7-9. UCERF3 Earthquake Probability ...............................................................................................7-12 Figure 8-1. FEMA 1 Percent Annual Chance Flood Zone ............................................................................8-7 Figure 8-2. 25 cm Sea Level Rise with 100-Year Storm Surge....................................................................8-8 Figure 8-3. 100 cm Sea Level Rise with 100-Year Storm Surge .................................................................8-9 Figure 8-4 Tsunami Hazard Area ................................................................................................................8-10 Figure 8-5. How Wildfires Cause Flooding.................................................................................................8-17 Figure 9-1. NWS Heat Index ..........................................................................................................................9-3 Figure 9-2. September 2024 Extreme Heat Map .........................................................................................9-5

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Table of Contents xii
Figure 10-1. Historic Landslide Occurrences.............................................................................................10-4 Figure 10-2. Steep Slope Map .....................................................................................................................10-5 Figure 10-3. Soils Map.................................................................................................................................10-6 Figure 10-4. Fall 2024 Motion of Landslides on the Palos Verdes Peninsula...................................... 10-11 Figure 10-5. Example of Beach and Trail Closure (Abalone Cove Reserve Closure)........................... 10-16 Figure 11-1. Santa Ana Winds.....................................................................................................................11-2 Figure 12-1. Palos Verdes Peninsula Fire Hazard Severity Zones ...........................................................12-5

Palos Verdes Peninsula, California | Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan BLACK & VEATCH | Executive Summary 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Point Vicente Lighthouse (Photo Credit: Adobe Stock)
Hazard mitigation involves implementing cost-effective and sustainable measures to minimize the risk to human life, property, and infrastructure from potential hazards. Through mitigation planning, the participating jurisdictions of the Palos Verdes Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan can develop a framework to lessen the impacts of natural disasters and create a more resilient community.

HAZARD MITIGATION OVERVIEW
The Palos Verde Peninsula cities and two special purpose districts developed a hazard mitigation plan (HMP) to continue its commitment to reducing risk of natural hazards for the residents, assets, and community lifelines within Palos Verde Peninsula. This planning effort aims to safeguard the people and essential services provided throughout the Planning Area.

This plan is a multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan (MJHMP) that includes annexes for jurisdictions throughout the Palos Verdes Peninsula to address the Planning Area’s specific capabilities, vulnerabilities, and mitigation opportunities. The Palos Verdes Peninsula MJHMP forms the foundation for a long-term strategy to reduce disaster losses and break the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction,