1 City Council
Tuesday, May 26, 2026, 7:00 PM
Regular Meeting
City of Rolling Hills
The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The City Council meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. View both the agenda and the live-streamed video.
Members of the public may submit written comments by emailing the City Clerk’s office at [email protected]. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record if received before 3pm on the meeting day. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.
View recordings to City Council meetings online.
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Presentations/Proclamations/Announcements
5. Approve Order of the Agenda
This is the appropriate time for the Mayor or Councilmembers to approve the agenda as is or reorder.
6. Blue Folder Items (Supplemental)
Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.
6.A. For Blue Folder Documents approved at the City Council Meeting RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
7. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items
2 This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will take place on any items not on the agenda.
8. Consent Calendar
Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any Councilmember may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Councilmembers for discussion.
8.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of May 26, 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
8.B. Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda
RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
8.C. Approve the following Minutes of May 11, 2026: City Council Regular Meeting; and May 5, 2026: Finance, Budget, Audit Committee Special Meeting RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
8.D. Payment of Bills
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
9. Excluded Consent Calendar Items
10. Commission Items
10.A. Receive and File Zoning Case No. 26-38: Site Plan Review for a 135-square-foot covered gazebo and outdoor kitchen, Conditional Use Permit for the use of such structure, a Variance to construct in the front yard and to waive the requirement for a stable and corral set-aside area, and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for a property located at 1 Chestnut Ln (Icarus LP, Mittal) (Lot 239-A-6-MS).
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File.
10.B. Receive and File Zoning Case No. 26-37: Site Plan Review to demolish an existing residence, expand the residential building pad, construct a new residence, attached garage, swimming pool, retaining walls exceeding a height of 3 feet (up to a maximum height of 5 feet), non-exempt grading, and other improvements; and Variance to exceed the 40% disturbance; and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for a property located at 4 Spur Lane (Lukic)(Lot 11-B-CH)
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File.
11. Public Hearings
3 12. Discussion Items
12.A. Accept the Tennis Court ADA Improvement Project #2025-03 as complete, file notice of completion, and release retention after a 30-day lien period to Fidelity Builders, Inc.
13. Matters From the City Council
13.A. Consideration and Discussion of Additional Handrails at the Rolling Hills Tennis Court Steps
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.
13.B. Consideration and discussion regarding a proposed response to Los Angeles County Homelessness Governance motion
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Provide direction to staff.
14. Matters From Staff
14.A. Consideration of authorizing the Mayor to sign a Veto Request of Governor Newsom regarding AB 1768 (Bryan) Transactions and Use Taxes: Los Angeles County
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Authorize the Mayor to sign a veto request letter.
15. Recess to Closed Session
15.A. Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)
Title: City Attorney
RECOMMENDATION: None.
15.B. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(D)(1) The City Finds, Based on Advice from Legal Counsel, that Discussion in Open Session will Prejudice the Position of the City in the Litigation. (2 Cases) A.
Name of Case: City of Rolling Hills v. SCE CPUC Docket No. C.24-10-008 B. Name of Case: City of Rolling Hills v. SoCalGas CPUC Docket No. C.24-10-009 RECOMMENDATION: None.
16. Reconvene to Open Session
17. Adjournment
Next regular meeting: Monday, June 8, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274.
4 Notice:
Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.
Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting.
Item: 6.A.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: For Blue Folder Documents approved at the City Council Meeting Background:
Discussion:
Fiscal Impact:
Recommendation:
Receive and file.
Attachments:
1. CL_AGN_260526_CC_Item10B
BLUE FOLDER ITEM (SUPPLEMENTAL)
Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 26, 2026
10B. Receive and File Zoning Case No. 26-37: Site Plan Review to demolish an existing residence, expand the residential building pad, construct a new residence, attached garage, swimming pool, retaining walls exceeding a height of 3 feet (up to a maximum height of 5 feet), non-exempt grading, and other improvements; and Variance to exceed the 40% disturbance; and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for a property located at 4 Spur Lane (Lukic)(Lot 11-B-CH)
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk 2026-05_PC_Resolution_4SpurLn_ZC26-39_F_R
2026-05_PC_Resolution_4SpurLn_ZC26-39_F_R_redline
CL_AGN_250526_CC_Item10B_PublicComment02
CL_AGN_250526_CC_Item10B_PublicComment03
Item: 8.A.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of May 26, 2026 Background:
None.
Discussion:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Approve.
Attachments:
1. CL_AGN_260526_CC_AffidavitofPosting
Administrative Report
8.A., File # 2026-129 Meeting Date:5/26/2026
To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
From: Christian Horvath, City Clerk
TITLE
APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 26, 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below.
Legislative Body City Council
Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda
Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window
City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agendas_meetings.php https://rollinghillsca.portal.civicclerk.com/
Meeting Date & Time MAY 26, 2026 7:00pm Open Session
As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below.
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Date: May 22, 2026
Item: 8.B.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda
Background:
None.
Discussion:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Approve.
Attachments:
None
Item: 8.C.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Approve the following Minutes of May 11, 2026: City Council Regular Meeting; and May 5, 2026: Finance, Budget, Audit Committee Special Meeting Background:
None.
Discussion:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
Attachments:
1. CL_MIN_260511_CC_F
2. CL_MIN_260505_FBA_F
MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2026
Minutes
Rolling Hills City Council
Monday, May 11, 2026
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m.
1. Call To Order
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Dieringer presiding.
2. Roll Call
Councilmembers Present: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer Councilmembers Absent:
Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Nicolas Papajohn, City Attorney
Robert Samario, Finance Operations Lead Consultant
3. Pledge Of Allegiance – Mayor Pro Tem Black
4. Presentations / Proclamations / Announcements
Mayor Dieringer recognized residents Richard Colyear, Julie Nagelhout, and Robert Nagelhout for Donating use of their tennis courts to the community during construction of the City’s courts.
5. Approve Order of the Agenda
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve the order of the agenda.
Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
6. Blue Folder Items (Supplemental) - None
7. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items
Public Comment: Alfred Visco
8. Consent Calendar
8.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the City Council Regular Meeting of May 11, 2026
8.B. Approve Motion to Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading of All Ordinances and Resolutions Listed on the Agenda
8.C. Approve the following Minutes of April 27, 2026: City Council Regular Meeting
8.D. Pulled by Mayor Pro Tem Black
MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2026
8.E. Pulled by Mayor Dieringer
8.F. Adopt Resolution 1410, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, California, assigning its available Proposition C Transportation Funds to the City of Rolling Hills Estates in support of the Palos Verdes Drive North and Dapplegray School Intersection Improvement Project
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 8D and 8E. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
9. Excluded Consent Calendar Items
8.D. Payment of Bills
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Black, seconded by Councilmember Pieper to approve. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
8.E. Adopt Resolutions Nos. 1408 and 1409 Pertaining to a General Municipal Election consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026.
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to approve. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10. Commission Items - None
11. Public Hearings - None
12. Discussion Items
12.A. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Proposed Budget including Finance, Budget, Audit Committee Recommendations
Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario.
Public Comment: Alfred Visco
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to receive and file and directing staff to remove seven thousand dollars budgeted in 01-705 (Temporary Salaries) and fifty-five thousand dollars budgeted in 75-946 (Buildings and Equipment). Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2026
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
12.B. Adopt Resolution No. 1411 establishing a Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service during Public Meetings Policy as required by SB 707 and in accordance with Government Code § 54953.4
Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath.
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to adopt Resolution No. 1411 as presented. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
13. Matters From the City Council
13.A. Consideration of Support for Assembly Bill 2529 (Johnson) – Government Claims Accountability
Presentation by City Manager Bañales.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Black, seconded by Councilmember Pieper to have Mayor Dieringer write a letter of support with proposed changes. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilmember Wilson posed a question regarding the Flying Triangle utility disconnection. He inquired if there were any environmental considerations or studies to justify recent grading and vegetation removal.
City Manager Bañales recommended agendizing a closed session item.
Mayor Dieringer discussed adding a South Bay Cities Council of Governments item regarding Measure A, Homeless Services, and the restructuring the local solutions fund to the next agenda.
14. Matters From Staff
14.A. Update on current City Hall Campus Capital Projects Presentation by Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Horvath.
Motion by Councilmember Pieper, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Black to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Pieper, Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The council directed staff to look into potential cost for handrails at the paver steps and agendize for next meeting.
MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Monday, May 11, 2026
15. Recess To Closed Session – 8:29 P.M.
15.A. Public Employee Performance Evaluation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)Title: City Attorney
16. Reconvene To Open Session – 9:06 P.M.
17. Adjournment: 9:06 P.M.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:06 p.m. on May 11, 2026. The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, May 26, 2026 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via the City’s website link at:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Bea Dieringer, Mayor
MINUTES – FINANCE/BUDGET/AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, May 5, 2026
Minutes
Rolling Hills Finance/Budget/Audit Committee
Monday, May 5, 2026
Special Meeting 6:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
The Finance/Budget/Audit Committee of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 6:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Black, Mayor Dieringer
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Robert Samario, Finance Operations Lead Consultant
Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk
3. Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items – None
4. Consent Calendar
4.A. Approve Affidavit of Posting for the Special Finance/Budget/Audit Committee Meeting of May 5, 2026
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Black, seconded by Mayor Dieringer to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote:
AYES: Black, Mayor Dieringer
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
5. Discussion Items
5.A. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Recommended Budget
Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario While the members were not necessarily in agreement, by acclamation, staff was directed to return to the City Council for discussion regarding concerns with proposed expense categories (01-705) Temporary Salaries as well as (75-946) Buildings & Equipment.
6. Items from the Finance Budget Audit Committee – None
7. Items from Staff – None
8. Adjournment: 6:51 P.M.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:51 p.m. on May 5, 2026. The next regular meeting of the Finance/Budget/Audit Committee is to be determined at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via City’s website link at:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php
MINUTES – FINANCE/BUDGET/AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, May 5, 2026
All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Christian Horvath, City Clerk
Approved,
____________________________________
Bea Dieringer, Mayor
Item: 8.D.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Payment of Bills
Background:
None.
Discussion:
None.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Approve as presented.
Attachments:
1. CL_AGN_260526_CC_PaymentOfBills_E
Item: 10.A.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Benjamin Johnson , Code Compliance Officer / Planning Technician Thru: Whitney Berry, Planning Manager
Subject: Receive and File Zoning Case No. 26-38: Site Plan Review for a 135-square-foot covered gazebo and outdoor kitchen, Conditional Use Permit for the use of such structure, a Variance to construct in the front yard and to waive the requirement for a stable and corral set-aside area, and finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for a property located at 1 Chestnut Ln (Icarus LP, Mittal) (Lot 239-A-6-MS).
Background:
On January 16, 2024, the Planning Commission approved the proposed project (Attachment E, F, and G). This decision was upheld by the City Council on February 12, 2024.
On June 12, 2024, the applicant submitted to Willdan Building and Safety for plan check and was approved in July 2024. The permit was not pulled at that time. Subsequently, on December 5, 2025, the applicant submitted revised plans for a smaller gazebo to Willdan Building and Safety, and the permits are ready to be issued. However, because this process extended beyond the two-year validity period granted by the City’s approvals and no construction had commenced, a resubmission of the project and a de novo review by the Planning Commission were required (RHMC Section 17.46.080).
On April 21, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project, where they took public testimony, discussed the issues, and voted 4-0 to approve the project, with Commissioner Douglass absent.
Discussion:
Since the City Council last saw this item in February 2024, the project has been reduced from a 245- square-foot (SF) gazebo to the currently proposed 135 SF gazebo (Attachment D).
As discussed above, the project has completed plan check with Willdan and is ready for building permit issuance.
Prior to the April 21, 2026, Planning Commission hearing, staff received one written comment
(Attachment C) from resident Gary Hansen (6 Chestnut) expressing concern that the proposed project was for-profit and would potentially be used for parties and short-term rentals.
At the April 21, 2026, Planning Commission hearing, the Commission received verbal comments from Monique Hansen, on behalf of her father, Gary Hansen (6 Chestnut), expressing concerns regarding the potential for-profit uses of the structures, along with potential impacts to the neighborhood from parking overflow for events hosted at the site.
The Planning Commission acknowledged Mr. Hansen's concerns and emphasized that no commercial use of the property is proposed, and that such uses would not be permitted within this residential zone. The Commission noted that the revision made the structure significantly smaller, reducing the footprint while maintaining the original location. The Commission approved the Project by a 4-0 vote, with Commissioner Douglass absent.
Environmental Review
The project was determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempted the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Receive and File.
Attachments:
1. Attachment A - PL_ADR_260413_1ChestnutLn_ZC26-38_RadiusMap
2. Attachment B - 2024-01_PC_Resolution_1ChestnutLn_ZC22-91_F_E
3. Attachment C - PL_ADR_260518_1ChestnutLn_Hansen_PublicComment_PC
4. Attachment D - PL_ADR_260408_1ChestnutLn_ZC26-38_Willdan_Plans_APPROVED
5. Attachment E - PL_ADR_2604013_1ChestnutLn_ZC26-38_OriginalStaffReport_01.16.24
6. Attachment F - PL_ADR_2604014_1ChestnutLn_ZC26-38_DevelopmentTable_UPDATED
7. Attachment G - 2026-04_PC_Resolution_1ChestnutLn_ZC26-38_F_E
City of Rolling Hills
TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. ZONING CASE NO. 26-38
Site Plan Review, Variance,
Conditional Use Permit
OWNER ICARUS LP. MITTAL
ADDRESS 1 CHESTNUT LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 SITE
A-1
Rolling Hills, CA
Chestnut Gazebo
TITLE SHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION
SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEX
1 Chestnut Lane
H E I D I P U S K A R
CA 90725
Rancho Palos Verdes
29431 N. Enrose Ave.
T e l : 3 1 0 7 7 0 - 2 7 9 1 A R C H I T E C T
CHESTNUT GAZEBO
VICINITY MAP
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
WEST ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
SOUTH ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
1/4"=1'-0"
SCALE
2 1/4"=1'-0"
SCALE
1 FLOOR PLAN
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
PATH SOLAR LIGHTS 2
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at all times, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications or alterations to these plans or specifications without the prior written permission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plans and specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemed to permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violates any provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 2:00:15 PM Mar 30, 2026 Mazen Dudar, P.E. Page 40 of 284 RUBBLE
WALL
BOARD WALK
STONE
BOARD WALK
BOARD WALK
STORAGE 111 SF
STONE
STONE
1120
1070
1065
1065
1065
1070
1035
1080
1075
1070
1065
1065
1110
1110
1080
1075
1040
1140
1140
1135
1135
1125
1125
1120
1115
1115
1110
1110
1105
1105
1100
1100
1095
1095
1060
1050
1045
1145
1145
1140
1140
1135
1135
1130
1130
1125
1125
1120
1115
1115
1110
1110
1105
1105
1100
1100
1095
1095
1090
1090
1085
1085
1075
1060
1060
1055
1055
1050
1045
WOOD STEPS
WOOD STEPS
WOOD STEPS
STEPS
POOL
SPA
PLANTER
CONC. DITCH
BOARD WALK
CONC. DITCH
CONC. DITCH
BOARD WALK
CONC. DITCH
1089.14
1089.08
1089.07
1089.31 FF
1089.17
1089.16
1089.13
1088.53
1088.90
1091.58
ROAD
1065
1070
1075
1080
1085
1090
1095
1100
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
1140
1145
1055
1050
1045
1040
1035
1025
1025
1030
1035
1040
1045
1050
1055
1060
1070
1065
1085
1075
1080
1090
1100
1105
1110
1125
1115
1120
1130
1135
1140
1145
1150
1115
1100
1110
1105
1095
1095
1100
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
STONE
1089.20
STONE
CONC. DITCH
2.5 HIGH WALL
3' WALL
3' WALL
CL
S 58°38'40" E
45.89'
N 87°10'48" E
264.75'
N 54°03'48" E
199.62'
S 79°49'00" E
67.41'
A17 5 .9 3 '
R10 0 2 .9 6 '
D10 °0 3 '0 1"
S 20°10'39" W
326.27'
STONE
STONE
STONE
10' EASEMENT
10' EASEMENT
10' EASEMENT
10' EASEMENT
3 RAIL FENCE
3 RAIL FENCE
3 RAIL FENCE
3 RAIL FENCE
1088.17
CHESTNUT LANE
ELEV2
PNTELEV
PNTELEV
ELEV2
ELEV2
EXISTING RESIDENCE
GAZEBO
3 CAR GARAGE
35' SIDE SETBACK
50' FRONT SETBACK
50' REAR SETBACK
35' SIDE SETBACK
(N) CONC. DRIVEWAY 320 SF
(E) CONC. DRIVEWAY
A-2 SITE PLAN / ROOF PLAN SCALE
1/16"=1'-0" 1
SITE/ROOF PLAN
H E I D I P U S K A R
CA 90725
Rancho Palos Verdes
29431 N. Enrose Ave.
T e l : 3 1 0 7 7 0 - 2 7 9 1 A R C H I T E C T
CHESTNUT GAZEBO
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at all times, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications or alterations to these plans or specifications without the prior written permission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plans and specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemed to permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violates any provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 2:00:15 PM Mar 30, 2026 Mazen Dudar, P.E. Page 41 of 284 A-3
FIRE, GREEN & BMP
NOTES
BMP VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE NOTES GREEN CODE NOTES
H E I D I P U S K A R
CA 90725
Rancho Palos Verdes
29431 N. Enrose Ave.
T e l : 3 1 0 7 7 0 - 2 7 9 1 A R C H I T E C T
CHESTNUT GAZEBO
MEP PLAN SCALE
1/4"=1'-0" 1
FIRE HYDRANT MAP N.T.S. FIRE HYDRANT FLOW CALC SCALE
2 GAZEBO
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at all times, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications or alterations to these plans or specifications without the prior written permission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plans and specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemed to permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violates any provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 2:00:15 PM Mar 30, 2026 Mazen Dudar, P.E. Page 42 of 284 DATE NO. REMARK 6+EETT,T/E ,668EDRE9,6ED DATE 6+EETNO. 7/24/2024 7/24/2024 KTW SOLUTIONS, INC. PO BOX 1266Lomita, CA 90717 T: 310.986.2185 E-MAIL: [email protected] 1 Chestnut Ln, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
1 Chestnut Ln S - 1 FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TYPICAL ROOF SHEATHING 18'-11" ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" STRUCTURAL PLAN MEMBER SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION MARK MEMBER SIZE NOTE REINFORCE CONCRETE SPECIFICATION DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION LEGENDS 2'-7" NOTES SHEET S-0 18'-11" CONCRETE FOUNDATION SCHED. NO. DESCRIPTION (WIDTHx LENGTH xDEPTH) REINF. 1 Chestnut Ln, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
07-24-24
TOTAL LOAD ON THE FOOTING D = 0.81+0.21 =1.02 KLR =1.14+0.35 =1.49 KE=0.588K F1 (Govern Case) BM1 6X10 13'-4"
RB1 6X10
11'-9" 3'-10" 3'-10"
BM1 6X10 P1 4x4x3/8" RR1 4x6@24"o.c.
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at alltimes, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications oralterations to these plans or specifications without the prior writtenpermission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plansand specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemedto permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violatesany provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING
2:00:16 PM Mar 30, 2026
Mazen Dudar, P.E.
DATE NO. REMARK
6+EETT,T/E
,668EDRE9,6ED
DATE
6+EETNO.
7/24/2024
7/24/2024
KTW SOLUTIONS, INC.
PO BOX 1266Lomita, CA 90717
T: 310.986.2185
E-MAIL: [email protected] 1 Chestnut Ln, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 1 Chestnut Ln SD - 1
STRUCTURAL
DETAILS
6 ROOF / FLOOR DIAPHRAGM SHEATHING PLAN
NOTE :
1 5
2 4
(N)CONC. PAD DETAIL
BEAM TO POST RIDGE BOARD / BEAM
RIDGE BEAM
3 ROOF RAFTER ON BEAM
KING POST TO RIDGE BEAM
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at all times, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications or alterations to these plans or specifications without the prior written permission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plans and specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemed to permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violates any provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 8:44:47 AM Jul 30, 2024 Mazen Dudar, P.E.
This set of plans and specifications must be kept at the job site at all times, and it is unlawful to make any changes, modifications or alterations to these plans or specifications without the prior written permission of the Building Official. The stamping of this set of plans and specifications SHALL NOT, under any circumstances, be deemed to permit or to be an approval of any work or activity that violates any provisions of any County Ordinance or State Law.
REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE BY:
WILLDAN ENGINEERING 2:00:16 PM Mar 30, 2026 Mazen Dudar, P.E. Page 44 of 284 Agenda Item No.: 10.A
Mtg. Date: 01/16/2024
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: JOHN SIGNO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY SERVICES THRU: KARINA BAÑALES
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 22-91: A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 264-SQUARE-FOOT COVERED PATIO
AND OUTDOOR KITCHEN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE USE
OF SUCH STRUCTURE, AND A VARIANCE REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD AND WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT
FOR A STABLE AND CORRAL SET ASIDE AREA LOCATED AT 1
CHESTNUT LANE (ICARUS LP, MITTAL)(LOT 239-A-6-MS) , ROLLING
HILLS, CA, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DATE: January 16, 2024
BACKGROUND:
Zoning, Location, and Lot Description
The lot is an irregularly shaped parcel zoned RAS-2. The net lot area is 100,623 square feet (2.3 acres). The lot has a depth of approximately 390 feet and a width of approximately 360 feet. There is approximately 450 feet of street frontage along Chestnut Lane. The driveway slopes upward from the street and is approximately 440 feet in length to the main residence, which is located in the middle of the property. The grade elevation from the street to the residence rises approximately 40 feet; the grade elevation from the residence to the rear of the property rises approximately 50 feet. Slopes are covered with mature trees and dense vegetation in the front, rear, and side yards.
Existing Development
There is one 12,330-square-foot building pad on the property developed with a 4,232-squarefoot single-family residence, 657-square-foot detached garage, 111-square-foot storage attached to the garage, 375-square-foot swimming pool/spa, 33-square-foot pool equipment, and 65-square-foot service yard. There is no barn and stable pad.
Past Approvals
The existing home, detached garage, and swimming pool were built in 1973. Roof-mounted solar panels were installed in 2018. In 2023, approvals were granted to demolish the covered patio (gazebo) and remove interior flooring. The latter does not require a building permit. In preparation for this hearing, staff observed work being done to expand the motor court. The expansion does not require a building permit, but Planning and RHCA approval were needed and obtained.
Code Enforcement
On July 6, 2021, a code enforcement case was opened for an unpermitted cabana that exceeded the maximum 200 square feet. The structure was built around 2020. After subsequent correspondences, an application was submitted on October 5, 2022. On October 18, 2022, the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) Architectural Committee reviewed the as-built structure and had issues with the roof pitch, material, and design. City staff continued to work with the applicant in the subsequent months, but was notified in lateJanuary 2023 that the owner had decided to demolish the patio cover with no plans to rebuild at the time. Subsequently, the patio cover was demolished, but the outdoor kitchen remained.
Code enforcement reached out to the owners that the outdoor kitchen was still an issue. In December 2023, staff received revised plans and continued processing the application.
DISCUSSION:
Applicant Request
On October 5, 2022, an application was duly filed by Heidi Puskar, on behalf of the property owner Icarus LP (Manager Ram Mittal) for a site plan review for an as-built covered patio and outdoor kitchen (barbecue area), conditional use permit for the use of such structures, and variance requests from Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.200(H) to encroach into the front yard and Section 17.16.170 to waive the requirement for a stable and corral set aside area. The covered patio has since been demolished but the outdoor kitchen remains. The applicant would like to rebuild the covered patio above the outdoor kitchen. The design of the new covered patio will be in accordance with the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) standards. RHCA is requiring a 4:12 pitched roof which is steeper than the demolished roof. They are also requiring certain building materials and wider stone columns. As such, the new covered patio will be taller and slightly larger than the one demolished, which was 9.5 feet high and 245 square feet. The new covering will be 11.3 feet high and 264 square feet.
Site Plan Review
RHMC requires a Site Plan Review for the construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Section 17.46.020(A)(2). The Project will add 264 square feet of covered area bringing the total structural area (excluding exempt structures) from 5,375 square feet (5.3%) to 5,639 square feet (5.6%).
The covered patio and outdoor kitchen are located next to the swimming pool in the eastern portion of the building pad. The area is already paved so there is no change to flatwork and no additional disturbance.
Conditional Use Permit
RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3) requires a Conditional Use Permit for a structure that exceeds 200 square feet. The Applicant is proposing a 264-square-foot covered patio and outdoor kitchen. Required findings in RHMC Section 17.42.050 must be met and are included in the proposed resolution.
Variances
RHMC Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance granting relief from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity or zone. Two variances are requested: (1) a variance from the requirements of Section 17.16.200(H) of the Zoning Code to encroach into the front yard, and (2) a variance from the requirements of Section 17.16.170 (stable and corral site required) of the Zoning Ordinance to waive the requirements of a stable and corral set aside. Findings are included in the proposed resolution.
MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE
Setbacks
The project complies with all of the required setbacks in the RAS-2 Zone.
Lot Coverage
The existing structural coverage excluding exempt structures is 5,375 square feet or 5.3%.
The project will add 264 square feet, for a total of 5,639 square feet or 5.6%. This is well under the maximum allowed 20% structural coverage. The existing flatwork coverage is 17,882 square feet or 17.8%, which remains unchanged with the proposed project. The total structural and flatwork excluding exempt structures will be 23,521 square feet or 23.4% of the net lot area, which is under the maximum 35% allowed.
Building Pad Coverage
The existing building pad is 12,330 square feet. The total structures on the building pad will be 5,639 square feet or, 45.7%. This exceeds the maximum 30% by 15.7%. However, this is only a guideline and not a code requirement.
Disturbance
The existing disturbed area is 26,400 square feet or 26.3% which is still below the maximum allowed 40%. There is no increase of disturbance because the proposed project is in an area that is already disturbed.
Stable Access
There is no stable and corral. The applicant is requesting a variance for relief due to steep slopes and limited developable area.
Neighbor Concerns
No public comment has been received as of the date of this report.
Environmental Review
The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303(e) (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines, which exempts accessory structures.
CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Section 17.46.050 - Required Site Plan Review Findings
The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Site Plan Review application. No project which requires Site Plan Review approval shall be approved by the
Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made:
1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance;
2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot;
3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences;
4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls);
5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area;
6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course;
7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas;
8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and
9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
If all of the above findings cannot be made with regard to the proposed project, or cannot be made even with changes to the project through project conditions imposed by City staff and/or the Planning Commission, the site plan review application shall be denied.
CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Section 17.42.050 - Basis for Approval or Denial of Conditional Use Permit The Commission (and Council on appeal), in acting to approve a conditional use permit
application, may impose conditions as are reasonably necessary to ensure the project is consistent with the General Plan, compatible with surrounding land use, and meets the provisions and intent of this title. In making such a determination, the hearing body shall find that the proposed use is in general accord with the following principles and standards:
1. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan;
2. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures;
3. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and buildings proposed;
4. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district;
5. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and
6. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title.
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES
Section 17.38.050 Required Variance Findings
In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings:
1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone;
2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question;
3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
4. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed;
5. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant;
6. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and
7. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, and discuss the proposed project. A resolution is provided in case the Planning Commission decides to approve the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment1_PL_ADR_1Chestnut_ZC22-91_VicinityMap.pdf
Attachment2_PL_ADR_1ChestnutLn_ZC22-91_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment3_2024-01_PC_Resolution_1ChestnutLn_ZC22-91_D.pdf Attachment4_PL_ADR_1ChestnutLane_ZC22-91_240104_GazeboPlan.pdf Attachment5_PL_ADR_1ChestnutLn_ZC22-91_221005_1ChestnutLn_ZC22-91_Pictures.pdf Attachment6_1ChestnutLane_ZC22-91_231204_PathLight.pdf
Development Table
Zoning Case No. 26-38
1 Chestnut Ln
Site Plan Review &
Conditional Use Permit EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
RAS-2 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE WITH
DETACHED
GARAGE, SHED,
AND POOL
GAZEBO WITH OUTDOOR
KITCHEN
Net Lot Area 100,480 SF 0 SF 100,480 SF
Residence 4,232 SF 0 SF 4,232 SF
Garage 657 SF 0 SF 657 SF
Swimming Pools/Spa 375 SF 0 SF 375 SF
Pool Equipment 33 SF 0 SF 33 SF
Gazebo 0 SF 135 SF 135 SF
Stable minimum: 450 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Corral minimum: 550 SF 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Recreation Court 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Attached Trellises 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Shed (Attached to Garage) 111 SF 0 SF 111 SF
Service Yard 65 SF 0 SF 65 SF
Basement Area 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Primary Driveway 7,822 SF 0 SF 7,822 SF
Paved walkways/Patio Areas/Courtyards 10,060 SF 0 SF 10,060 SF Pool Decking 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Other Paved Driveways, Road Easements,
Parking Pads
0 SF 0 SF 0 SF
Grading (balanced onsite) 0 CY CUT
0 CY FILL
0 CY
TOTAL
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% Maximum)
5,473 SF (5.4%) 135 SF (0.1%) 5,608 (5.5%)
Flatwork Lot Coverage
(15% Maximum)
17,882 SF (17.8%) 0 SF (0%) 17,882 SF (17.8%)
Total Lot Coverage
(Structures and Flatwork)
(35% Maximum)
23,355 SF (23.2%) 135 SF (0.1%) 23,490 SF (23.3%)
Building Pad 1 Coverage
12,330 SF Existing Pad Area
5,473 SF (44.3%) 135 SF (1.1%) 5,608 SF (45.4%)
Total Disturbed Area
(40% maximum)
26,400 SF (26.3%) 0 SF (0%) 26,400 SF (26.3%)
Building Heights
21 FT Maximum
11 FT 4 IN 11 FT 4 IN 11 FT 4 IN
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-38 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A 135-SQUARE-FOOT COVERED PATIO AND
OUTDOOR KITCHEN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE USE OF SUCH
STRUCTURE, AND A VARIANCE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT
YARD AND WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STABLE AND CORRAL SET ASIDE AREA; AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 1 CHESTNUT LANE (ICARUS LP, MITTAL) (LOT 239-A-6-MS)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Ram Mittal on behalf of Icarus LP with respect to real property located at 1 Chestnut Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 239-A-6-MS) requesting a Site Plan Review for an 11.3-foot-high, 135-square-foot covered patio and outdoor kitchen, Conditional Use Permit for the use of such structures, and a Variance request to waive the requirement for a stable and corral set aside area. The structures were constructed around 2020 without permits.
Section 2. The subject property is developed with one building pad with a 4,232- square-foot single-family residence, 657-square-foot detached garage, 375-square-foot swimming pool/spa, 33-square-foot pool equipment, and 111-square-foot storage attached to the garage.
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 16, 2024.
Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on January 5, 2024. The applicant and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings.
Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal. The Planning Commission approved the project on January 16, 2024. The decision was upheld by the City Council on February 12, 2024.
Section 4. The project approvals were valid for a period of two years following the date of approval, in accordance with RHMC Sections 17.38.070, 17.42.070, and 17.46.080. The applicant was unable to complete the plan check process during the period of validity, and the project approvals expired on January 16, 2026, thus requiring resubmission of the project for a noticed public hearing to the Planning Commission.
Section 5. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
2 not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the construction of a new single-family residence and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The site has already been graded and existing structures are on site.
Section 6. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A). The Project is for a 135-squarefoot covered patio and outdoor kitchen which are ancillary to the main residence. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The Project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance.
The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance.
The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The development is located on the existing building pad next to the main residence, which will reduce the visual impact from neighboring properties and from Chestnut Lane.
The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 100,480 square feet (2.3 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 5,639 square feet or 5.6% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,521 square feet or 23.4% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area is 26,400 square feet or 26.3% (40% max permitted), which will not change since the location of the project is already disturbed.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the project will be on the existing building pad which enables project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. Further, the project will be a sufficient distance from nearby residences so views and privacy of surrounding neighbors will not be impacted. The lot has an existing building pad and 26.3% of the lot is already disturbed with the remaining area either landscaped or left in a natural state.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
3 The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project from Chestnut Lane. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped or landscaped.
D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls).
There will be no changes to the overall drainage features on the lot. The proposed project is located on an existing building pad. The natural site design, native vegetation, and mature trees will not be affected.
E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area.
No grading is involved with the proposed project.
F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course.
No grading is involved with the proposed project. Existing drainage flow will not be changed or redirected. Drainage will follow the natural drainage courses of the lot.
G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas.
Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected. The development will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community.
As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors.
H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
There are no changes to the existing circulation for the pedestrians or vehicles.
I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
4 and fences. Here, the Project includes the construction of a covered patio and outdoor kitchen to a developed residential property. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
Section 7. Conditional Use Permit Findings. RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3) requires a Conditional Use Permit for a structure that exceeds 200 square feet. The Applicant is proposing a 135-square-foot covered patio and outdoor kitchen. Given the foregoing, in accordance with RHMC Section 17.42.050, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:
A. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan.
The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and meets all the applicable code development standards for such use. The Project is compatible with existing land uses as other properties in the same zone have a covered patio and outdoor kitchen. The Project is consistent with Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 2, which aims for expanded opportunities for outdoor recreation.
B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures.
The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the Project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed covered patio and outdoor kitchen is on the east portion of the already existing building pad.
C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the uses and buildings proposed.
The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards in the RAS-2 Zone. The net lot area is 100,480 square feet and is adequate to support the proposed use. The outdoor kitchen is already existing; roofing will cover the outdoor kitchen and will not exceed the maximum allowable 800 square feet maximum.
D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district.
That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the RAS-2 Zone, districts, including size, setbacks, and location.
That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
5 facilities. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the Project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
E. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title.
The covered patio and outdoor kitchen allow the Applicants the ability to enjoy rights enjoyed by other residents in the City. The proposed use is consistent with the residential character of the City.
Section 8. Variance. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance granting relief from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity or zone. A variance from the requirements of Section 17.16.200(H) of the Zoning Code is requested to encroach into the front yard. A variance from the requirements of Section 17.16.170 (stable and corral site required) of the Zoning Ordinance is requested to waive the requirements of a stable and corral set aside.
With respect to the aforementioned request, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.
The area for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen is located in the front yard; it is closer to the street easement than the existing residence. However, the area is much higher than the roadway and functions as a backyard for the residence due to the configuration and topography of the lot. This condition does not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.
The natural slope of the subject property, the location of the building pad, and the shape of the lot constrain development. The building pad was created in the middle of the property overlooking the road below. The building pad is small, constrained, and the slopes surrounding the building pad does not allow for a reasonably sized pad for a stable and corral.
The deck area for the swimming pool, covered patio, and outdoor kitchen is on the eastern side of the residence near a slope. Due to the size, topography, and configuration of the lot, there is no space for a reasonably sized stable and corral (1,000 square feet minimum).
If a stable and corral is built on the property, a variance request would be needed to build in a required setback area on slopes greater than 4:1; non-exempt grading may also require variance.
The size, topography, and configuration of the lot do not support the construction of a stable and corral. By granting this variance, the current or future property owners are not
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
6 precluded from applying for approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or construction plan is later identified. The property owner is merely relieved from the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral.
B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question.
The variance to encroach into the front yard is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property. The area for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen is located much higher than the roadway and functions as a backyard for the residence due to the configuration and topography of the lot.
The variance to deviate from the stable and corral set aside area is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the property owner since the property contains steep slopes not suitable for a new pad. The ability to provide a stable and corral or a set aside area is an amenity enjoyed by most property owners in the City. The subject property is not capable of providing such an amenity due to constraints with size, topography, and configuration. The limited building pad on the property prevents the construction of a new stable and corral or placement of a set aside area.
Other than placement of the stable and corral set aside area in the front yard area, the applicant looked into possible placement toward the rear of the property. Access, due to steep topography, would have required extensive grading. Other properties that have development constraints were granted variance for stable and corral set aside. By granting this variance, the current or future property owners are not precluded from applying for approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or construction plan is later identified. The property owner is merely relieved from the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral.
C. The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity.
Granting the variance to encroach into the front yard is not materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The area for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen functions as a backyard for the residence due to the configuration and topography of the lot. It is not in close proximity to other properties or improvements in the vicinity.
The lack of a stable and corral set aside area will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity since no development would occur.
Eliminating a set aside area will not negatively affect drainage or traffic circulation to and from the property.
The variance from the stable and corral set aside will not be detrimental to the public, on the contrary, it will be beneficial to the public welfare and other properties because by not
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
7 constructing a stable and corral, there will be no grading on the lot. If the set aside area was placed in the front yard, it would be close to the road and to a neighboring property.
D. In granting the variances, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed.
The area for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen is essentially the backyard for the residence. The area is much higher than the roadway and inconspicuous. The improvements are ancillary to the residence and meet the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
The elimination of a set aside area is consistent with other properties in the area that do not have a stable and corral nor have a set aside area. The variance will make the property more cohesive with the rural character of the neighborhood by eliminating grading needed for a building pad.
The waiver to the stable and corral set aside area meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance as it will prevent extensive grading and disturbance on the property. It will also preserve the environmentally sensitive nature of the site by protecting the slopes from any construction. The size, topography, and configuration of the lot does not support the construction of a stable and corral. By granting this variance, the current or future property owners are not precluded from applying for approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or construction plan is later identified. The property owner is merely relieved from the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral.
E. The variances will not grant special privilege to the applicant.
The area for the covered patio and outdoor kitchen is located on the same building pad as the existing residence. However, due to the configuration and topography of the lot, the area is in the front yard, even though it functions as a backyard. The variance will not grant a special privilege to the applicant.
The waiver of the stable and corral set aside area in this case will not grant special privilege to the applicant. There are several properties in the City that do not lend themselves to construction of a stable and corral, and if they were forced to either set aside an area or construct such equestrian facilities it would require large grading quantities and large disturbance of the lot. This would not meet the goal of the General Plan, which is to maintain to the maximum extent feasible the natural terrain of the lots. The size, topography, and configuration of the lot does not support the construction of a stable and corral. By granting this variance, the current or future property owners are not precluded from applying for approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or construction plan is later identified. The property owner is merely relieved from the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral.
F. The variances are consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
8 The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. It will not affect any existing hazardous waste management facilities.
G. The variances are consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
The project is in line with the General Plan’s requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between neighboring structures. Even though the structures encroach into the front yard and stable and corral set aside requirement is being waived, the variances are in line with the City’s General Plan’s goal to maintain to the maximum extent feasible the natural terrain of the lot. The size, topography, and configuration of the lot does not support the construction of a stable and corral. By granting this variance, the current or future property owners are not precluded from applying for approval to construct a stable and corral at a future date if a suitable location or construction plan is later identified. The property owner is merely relieved from the obligation to identify and set aside an area for a stable and corral.
Section 9. Approval Conditions. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 26-38 subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections.
B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlements granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to RHMC Chapter 17.58.
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
9 C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on December 19, 2023, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.
The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.
Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in mature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. The applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required.
E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 5,473 square feet or 5.4% of the net lot area, in conformance with structural lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). The flatwork coverage shall not exceed 17,882 square feet or 17.8%.
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 23,355 square feet or 23.2% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% maximum).
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
10 H. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 26,400 square feet or 26.3%, and the Project does not propose any additional disturbance.
I. The existing Building Pad 1 coverage is 5,375 square feet or 43.6%, and the Project proposes an additional 135 square feet or 2.1%, and shall not exceed coverage of 5,639 square feet or 45.7% with allowed deductions. This exceeds the 30% maximum guideline by
15.7%.
J. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department.
K. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements.
L. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190.E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32).
M. All utility lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030.
N. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared.
O. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan, if required, shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City’s landscape consultant.
P. A construction fence may be required. If needed, it shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department for location, height, and screening material prior to installation.
Q. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any of improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness.
R. There shall be no discarding of any debris, trash, soil and construction spoils or any other material into the canyon or deposited anywhere on the property, including easements.
No grading, planting, structures, drainage devices or hardscape, including driveways, or storage of any objects including building materials shall take place in the easements, unless approved by the RHCA.
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
11 S. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City.
T. The City or the Building Department may require a construction fence for the duration of the grading for this project. Such fence shall not be located in any easement or cross over trails or natural drainage course and shall be removed immediately upon completion of the grading work.
U. During construction, the site shall be maintained in a safe manner so as not to threaten the health, safety, or general welfare of the public.
V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
W. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times.
X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
Y. Prior to demolition of any existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies.
Z. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions.
Resolution No. 2026-04
1 Chestnut Lane (Icarus LP/Mittal)
12 AA. Storm water shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan at the discretion of the Building Official. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety if applicable. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
BB. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
CC. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in the 2022 County of Los Angeles Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution.
DD. The property owner shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank.
EE. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any.
FF. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan.
GG. This Resolution’s approvals shall not be effective until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions set forth herein.
HH. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department.
II. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
JJ. The project shall at all times comply with the conditions set forth in Section
17.16.200(H) of the RHMC in that the freestanding covered patio: 1) shall not be part of aggregate of five such structures on the lot; 2) shall not exceed eight hundred square feet in combination with other freestanding structures identified in the section; 3) shall not be more than 12 feet in height; and 4) shall be screened from public right-of-way, easements and adjacent properties with appropriate landscaping to the extent feasible.
Item: 10.B.
Meeting Date: 5/26/2026
To: City Council
From: Whitney Berry, Planning Manager
Thru: Karina Bañales, City Manager
Subject: Receive and File Zoning Case No. 26-37: Site Plan Review to demolish an existing residence, expand the residential building pad, construct a new residence, attached garage, swimming pool, retaining walls exceeding a height of 3 feet (up to a maximum height of 5 feet), non-exempt grading, and other improvements; and Variance to exceed the 40% disturbance; and finding the project categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act for a property located at 4 Spur Lane (Lukic)(Lot 11-B-CH)
Background:
On January 16, 2024, the Planning Commission held a morning field trip at the subject property and viewed the silhouettes of the proposed project. The project was presented later that night at the evening Planning Commission meeting, at which time the Commission voted to continue to the item and directed staff to work with the applicant to revise the project and address identified issues. The applicant subsequently revised the project.
On March 19, 2024, the Planning Commission held a morning field trip at the subject property and viewed the updated silhouettes for the revised project. The project was presented later that night at the evening Planning Commission meeting, at which time the Commission approved the project with the condition that the building pad and ridge line be decreased by 18 inches. The applicant subsequently revised the project.
On April 22, 2024, the City Council received and filed a report on the subject project, thereby upholding the Planning Commission’s approval.
On July 3, 2024, the applicant submitted to Los Angeles County’s Department of Public Works for plan check and has remained in plan check with various agencies since that time. Since the Project received its initial approvals in 2024, the area below this property has experienced a degree of land movement. The applicant has been working with LA County to obtain the necessary geotechnical approvals and permits to construct the project. The length of that process extended beyond the twoyear period of validity granted by the City’s approvals, requiring a resubmission of the project and a de novo review by the Planning Commission (RHMC Section 17.46.080).
On April 21, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the project, where they took public testimony, discussed the issues, and voted 3-0 to approve the project, with Commissioner Soo recusing and Commissioner Douglass absent.
Discussion:
Since the City Council last saw this item in April 2024, there have been no substantive changes to the design of the proposed residence, swimming pool, retaining walls, or hardscape. The Site Plan Review and Variance findings remain the same, and the same scope was approved by the Planning Commission in 2024 and re-approved on April 21, 2026.
As discussed above, the project has been in plan check with Los Angeles County’s Department of Public Works and various other county agencies since July 2024. The applicant has been working to obtain the necessary geotechnical approvals and permits to construct the project. The length of that process extended beyond the two-year period of validity granted by the City’s approvals, requiring a resubmission of the Project and a de novo review by the Planning Commission (RHMC Section
17.46.080).
The County required a few engineering changes during the plan check process, including to the proposed drainage and septic system. The applicant is required to receive all necessary geotechnical approvals and other approvals from the County, and the project must meet all applicable requirements of utility providers.
Staff reached out to County staff for context regarding the drainage and septic system requirements.
Regarding drainage, the project is required to retain stormwater runoff on site and has incorporated an underground cistern to do so. The cistern is to be located under the driveway and has been sized to store up to 1200 cubic feet of water. Should the cistern get full, any overflow will go through a connected pipe and daylight at a drainage outlet located at the northwest corner of the property.
County staff have confirmed that the proposed drainage represents an improvement over existing drainage conditions at the site and that this project will result in a minor 0.2% increase in runoff.
Regarding septic, the Project is required to use a non-conventional onsite wastewater treatment system that is a more advanced engineering solution that minimizes wastewater loading to soils that have reduced capacity for uptake. In these types of systems, wastewater is slowly released over strictly timed cycles rather than continually released to the subsurface. Drip dispersal systems are generally installed 12 to 18 inches below ground surface, where most of the water is absorbed by plant roots and then evapotranspirated to the atmosphere.
It’s important to note that such changes are not a part of the City’s Zoning Code and are thus beyond the scope of the Planning Commission’s review. The Planning Commission’s decision is based on the Project’s conformance with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Code, and the required findings to obtain a variance, in accordance with RHMC Chapters 17.38 and 17.46. The City’s approval of the Project does not waive or alter the applicant’s requirements to obtain all necessary County permits to construct the Project.
Prior to the April 21, 2026, Planning Commission hearing, the Commission received three written comments (Attachment C) as summarized below:
• Residents Don and Mary Lou Crocker (14 Cinchring) wrote a letter of support for the Project subject to geotechnical review and approval by the County. • Residents Dustin and Melissa McNabb (11 Quail Ridge South) wrote a letter of concern about
the adequacy and scope of geotechnical investigations, increase in runoff due to the project and incorrect drainage outlet location on plans. They requested that the Planning Commission require a new, comprehensive and independent geological study for the Project, review the RHCA license agreement for the driveway and drainage inlet and review the stormwater retention system proposed for 23 Crest Road East as a potential enhancement to the drainage for this Project.
• Resident James Bellis (3 Quail Ridge South) wrote a letter of concern, requesting that the City Council and Planning Commission consider a building moratorium in the vicinity of the land movement, and also requested the Planning Commission stop issuing variances for lot coverage and building size. His concern is that construction within the vicinity of the land movement creates and intensifies land disturbance and movement. Mr. Bellis also requested policies encouraging permeable surfaces be considered.
At the April 21, 2026, Planning Commission hearing, the Commission received verbal comments from the applicant team, residents and the property owner as summarized below:
• Luis de Moraes, Project Architect, spoke about the delays experienced with LA County’s plan check review, specifically related to the County’s Geotechnical and Materials Engineering Department (GMED). The County has requested several changes to the Project during the plan check process, including changes to the handling of drainage for the site and the proposed septic system.
• Dan Bolton, Project Civil Engineer, spoke about how GMED required Hamilton & Associates, the Project Geotechnical Engineer, to review reports that incorporate land movement information and conduct new investigations at site as part of their review process. He also stated that the underground cistern required by the GMED Geotechnical Engineer will retain runoff at the site and therefore avoid increasing runoff from the site. Mr. Bolton also discussed the proposed inlet between 2 and 4 Spur which will prevent uncontrolled discharge flowing down the hillside and instead will convey this runoff by pipe to an outlet with riprap at the rear of the site. He confirmed that the proposed outlet is located outside the easement as required by the RHCA.
• Resident Alfred Visco (15 Cinchring Road) spoke about his concerns regarding the impacts of land movement on this project, the lack of monitoring of land movement at 4 Spur, and the lack of geology reports provided to the Planning Commission and community. He shared research published in 2023 Journal of Geotechnical and Geoengineering regarding construction effects to neighbors in areas with slow-moving landslides. Mr. Visco also expressed concern about calculation errors related to disturbed area and building pad coverage in the March 2024 staff report.
• Resident Melissa McNabb (11 Quail Ridge South) spoke about her concerns regarding the changes described by the applicant that were not discussed in the staff report or provided in the materials to the Planning Commission. Mrs. McNabb expressed concern about uncontrolled drainage flowing down the steep slope at the back of the property and that the proposed inlet would funnel runoff from Spur to her property and cause damage. • Resident James Bellis (3 Quail Ridge South) spoke about his request for a building moratorium in the vicinity of the land movement, and also requests that the Planning Commission stop issuing variance for lot coverage and building size. Mr. Bellis expressed concerns that construction creates land disturbance that contributes to land movement, along with concerns regarding the increase in impervious surface and increase in runoff. He requested more pervious surfaces on site.
• Resident Fred Lorig (1 Spur Lane) discussed geosensors placed on Spur Lane following the power shut offs and that the results, shared with both the City and Edison, confirmed no
movement in front of 1, 2 or 4 Spur Lane enabling power to be turned back on. Mr. Lorig stated that he was not speaking in favor or against the subject project. • Resident Maureen Hill (11 Cinchring Road) spoke about her concerns about land movement at her property and any water coming down from subject property above that would impact her property. She requested a building moratorium.
• Resident McNabb spoke again, stating that there has been a lot of movement on Quail Ridge South and Cinchring Road immediately below Spur Lane, despite the absence of measured movement on Spur Lane.
• Property Owner Nebojsa Lukic (4 Spur Lane) expressed frustration about the length of time and process that this project has been required to go through, along with the holding costs and design costs due to ongoing reviews. He stated his intention to improve the property for his family and to be a good neighbor by responding to neighbor's request to reduce the ridge height to minimize view impacts.
Following public comments, the Planning Commission acknowledged this was a difficult situation and expressed reservations about the overall process. Planning Commission Chair Chelf confirmed that a building moratorium is not within the Planning Commission’s purview. The Commission noted several revisions to the Project that were made to address neighbor concerns. The Commission determined that the runoff capture and drainage proposed for the site is an improvement and that these items had been addressed to their satisfaction. The Commission approved the Project by a 3-0 vote, with Commissioner Soo recusing and Commissioner Douglass absent.
Public Correspondance
On May 20, 2026, City staff received correspondence from James Bellis at 3 Quail Ridge Road South regarding the item before the City Council this evening (Attachment G).
Environmental Review
The project was determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempted the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences.
Fiscal Impact:
None.
Recommendation:
Receive and File.
Attachments:
1. Attachment A - PL_ADR_4SpurLn_ZC26-37_052626_RadiusMap
2. Attachment B - 2026-05_PC_Resolution_4SpurLn_ZC26-39_F_A_E
3. Attachment B2 - 2026-05_PC_Resolution_4SpurLn_ZC26-39_F_R
4. Attachment B3 - 2026-05_PC_Resolution_4SpurLn_ZC26-39_F_R_redline2024
5. Attachment C - CL_AGN_260421_PC_Item10B_PublicComments
6. Attachment D - PL_ADR_4SpurLn_ZC23-100-Plans
7. Attachment E - CL_AGN_240319_PC_OriginalStaffReport
8. Attachment F - 2024-03_PC_Resolution_4SpurLane_ZC 23-100_Lukic_F_E
9. Attachment G - May 20, 20206 - J. Bellis Public Correspondence
10. Attachment H - CL_AGN_250526_CC_Item10B_PublicComment02
11. Attachment I - CL_AGN_250526_CC_Item10B_PublicComment03
City of Rolling Hills
TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. ZONING CASE NO. 26-37
Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, Variance
OWNER LUKIC
ADDRESS 4 SPUR LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 SITE
1,000’
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-37 FOR A
SITE PLAN REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE,
ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40% DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY; AND FINDING THE PROJECT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 4 SPUR LANE (LUKIC) (LOT 11-B-CH)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Luis de Moraes of Envirotechno Architecture Inc, on behalf of the property owners Mr. Neb Lukic and Jennifer Lukic (“Applicants”), with respect to real property located at 4 Spur Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 11-B-CH) requesting a site plan review to demolish an existing 3,525-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 5,535-square-foot single-family residence and attached garage in a similar footprint, and construct maximum five-foot-high retaining walls in the rear portion of the building pad and in the side yards, expand the existing residential building pad to 13,920 square feet, conduct 4,685 cubic yards of non-exempt grading, a new 1,010-square-foot swimming pool, and 34-square-foot pool equipment. The project requires a new main driveway and removal of the existing driveway. The project also includes 34-square-foot pool equipment, 453-square feet of attached covered porches, 166-square-foot barbecue, 55 cubic yards grading (exempt), and 123-square-foot service yard, which are not subject to discretionary review. A variance is requested to exceed the 40% maximum disturbance. The applicants originally requested a 1,585-square-foot stable and driveway access in the rear portion of the property; however, this was withdrawn from the project.
Section 2. The existing single-family residence was built in 1951, and in 1962, the Planning Commission approved a variance for an addition to a single-family residence.
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its morning field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 16, 2024. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on January 5, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings.
Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal. The Planning Commission opened the meeting, took public testimony, and continued the public hearing to a later date. The Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant on revising the plans to decrease the amount of grading for the Project. The Planning Commission directed the applicants to bring the project back when the relocated driveway and apron in the relocated easements were approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). On
2 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
February 22, 2024, the RHCA approved the relocation of the driveway and apron on Spur Lane.
The applicants were granted access to use the RHCA easement for the new driveway and apron.
The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its field trip meeting and regular meeting on March 19, 2024. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on March 6, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented at the public hearing from all persons interested in affecting said proposal.
Section 4. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission held a special meeting to review the two new proposed driveways and aprons. The main driveway apron is located on Spur Lane and the secondary driveway to the stable is located on Cinchring Road. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission approved the main driveway and denied the secondary driveway for stable access. The Traffic Engineer did not recommend the secondary driveway due to safety and drainage concerns. The Traffic Commission directed staff to work with the applicants to consider alternative locations for the secondary driveway for stable access. The applicants decided to remove the stable and secondary driveway from the project at this time.
Section 5. The project approvals were valid for a period of two years following the date of approval, in accordance with RHMC Sections 17.38.070 and 17.46.080. The applicant was unable to complete the plan check process during the period of validity, and the project approvals expired on March 19, 2026, thus requiring resubmission of the project for a noticed public hearing to the Planning Commission.
Section 6. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area excluding the roadway easement is 1.08 acre (47,063 square feet). Currently, there is only one building pad that exists on the property. The project includes an existing 7,260-square-foot building pad near the front of the property closest to the street. The existing residence is located 14-feet from the front roadway easement, 25-feet from the west side property line, and 24 from the east side property line. The rear property line is located downslope of the building pad over 288 feet to the south.
The current residence encroaches into the 30-foot front setback by 10 feet.
Section 7. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the demolition of a residence and construction of a new single-family residence and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303.
Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The site has already been graded and existing structures are on site.
Section 8. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for demolition of an existing residence and for the construction of a new 4,780-square-foot residence and attached 665- square-foot garage pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A), for a retaining wall above three
3 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
feet in height pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.190(F), a 1,010-square-foot swimming pool pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A)2.b for swimming pool/spa more than 800-square-feet, expansion of existing residential building pad to 13,780-square-feet, and for non-exempt grading totaling 4,685 CY including 55 CY of export (exempt) pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A).
With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance.
The proposed development, which includes demolition and construction of a residence and grading is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance, subject to a site plan review. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, lowdensity residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The new residence will be built on the existing 7,260-square-foot building pad that be enlarged to 13,780-square-feet, expanded 60 feet, and the existing grade will be lowered 7-feet in depth, which will reduce the visual impact. The site plan review for the retaining walls not to exceed the 5-foot maximum height along the southwest corner of the residence.
The new residence meets the requirements for reduced setbacks on a smaller lot.
According to RHMC Section 17.24.045, reduced setbacks may apply to properties in the RAS1 zoning district that have a lot area of 1.25 acres or less, excluding roadway easements. As such, the new residence will have a 30-foot front yard setback.
The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 47,063-square feet or 1.08 acres per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 7,934 square feet or 16.86% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; the total flatwork coverage proposed is 6,775-square-feet or 14.40%, and the total lot coverage proposed, including structural & flatwork, would be 14,709 square feet or 31.25% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to be 29,880 square feet or 63.49% (40% permitted). The disturbed area exceeds the maximum 40% permitted by 22.49%. The applicant has requested a Variance to exceed the disturbance limitations to 29,880 square-feet or 63.49%.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the proposed grading and retaining wall for development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the grading and retaining wall allows the proposed construction to be constructed largely on an existing building pad which enables proposed project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. The existing building pad is relatively small at 7,260-square-feet, the RHMC requires a minimum 12,000-square-foot building pad. The enlargement of the building pad to 13,380-square-feet, 40-foot expansion, and lowering
4 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
the pad by 7-feet in depth will level and even out the lot for the new residence, swimming pool/spa, driveway, and amenities.
The applicants are proposing to remove the existing driveway on Spur Lane located on the northeastern side of the property and construct a new driveway on the northwestern side of the property. The new garage will be located at the northeastern portion of the parcel. The new driveway will be 90 feet long by 22 feet wide extending to the new garage.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.
The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project from Spur Lane as it utilizes the enlarge and expand the existing building pad and has a similar footprint to the existing residence. The existing driveway will be relocated to the northwest portion of the lot and repaved to align with the new garage. The swimming pool/spa will be located at the edge of the expanded residential building pad. The retaining walls have been designed to support the expanded building pad.
D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls).
A landscape plan has been prepared to for compliance with water efficient landscape ordinance requirements and low impact development standards. The landscape plan will introduce additional landscaping, which will be compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. The grading and retaining wall are designed to preserve existing topography where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area.
Grading consists of 2,375 CY of cut and 2,375 CY of fill. The grading and retaining walls are designed to preserve slopes where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course.
Grading will be done to improve the residential building pad, driveway and walkways throughout the site. Drainage will not change and will follow the natural drainage courses of the lot.
G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with
5 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas.
Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected and new landscaping will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community.
Landscaping will provide a buffer or transition between various pads on the property. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors.
H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
The garage has been relocated to the northeast portion of the parcel and the garage access is reoriented to the west. The new driveway is accessible from the relocated apron at the northeast corner of the parcel, extends 22 feet wide by 90 feet long at the north end of the parcel.
The new driveway and apron will provide better circulation and parking for the property owners’ family and guests. An adequate pathway is proposed to safely accommodate pedestrians around the residence to the backyard and the rear of the property. Adequate walkways will be provided to the pool and deck.
I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the construction of a new single-family residence, swimming pool, retaining walls, and associated grading. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
Section 9. Variance. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting variances to for the development to exceed the maximum 40% of the net lot area as identified in Section 17.16.170, Section 17.16.150(B). With respect to the request for variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.
There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. The residence was developed prior to the City’s incorporation and has a legal nonconforming front yard setback of 30 feet which may continue pursuant to Section 17.24.045. However, the small lot size and location of the building pad near the street are exceptional circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is warranted due to the unique sloping topography that does not apply generally to
6 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
other properties in the vicinity. The existing building pad is 7,260 square feet, and in order for the lot to conform to the minimum 12,000 building pad size, additional disturbance of 6,520 square feet will be added for a total of 13,780-square-foot building pad.
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question.
Granting the requested variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights on the property. The existing main building pad is too small, therefore a larger building pad which requires additional disturbance of 23% will accommodate a new residence, garage, driveway, swimming pool, and improvements. Other properties in the vicinity enjoy these types of improvements.
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Granting the variances to exceed the maximum allowable 40% disturbance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity; a new residence, garage, driveways, swimming pool/spa, and other improvements are allowed in the Rolling Hills community. Further, the project will be consistent with other developments in the area.
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed.
The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the proposed construction complies with the low-profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an overbuilt look. The lot is sufficient to accommodate the proposed use.
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant.
The construction in the side setback allows a new single family home similar to others enjoyed by many properties throughout the City. The project, together with the variances, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the GeneralPlan.
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
7 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
Granting the variance will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which allows and encourages residential uses and property improvements. It will further the lowprofile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over-built look.
Section 10. Approval Conditions. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 26-37 subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections.
B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlements granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to RHMC Chapter 17.58.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working
8 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.
The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.
Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in mature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. The applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required.
E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 7,934 square feet or 16.86% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum).
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 14,818 square feet or 31.49% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% maximum).
H. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and corral area shall not exceed 63.49%, or 29,880 square feet surface area. Grading for this project shall not exceed 2,375 CY of cut and 2,375 CY for a total of 4,750 cubic yards balanced on site.
I. The residential building pad is proposed at 13,780 square feet and shall not exceed coverage of 7,303 square feet or 53.00% with allowed deductions. The set aside pad for a future stable and corral is proposed at 1,000 square feet.
J. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the apron of the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope.
9 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
K. Access to the set aside area for the future stable and corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; the access route shall not be wider than 12 feet.
L. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department.
M. Per LA County Building Code, a pool barrier and/or fencing shall be required for the pool.
N. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements.
O. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190.E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32).
P. All utility lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030.
Q. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared.
R. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City’s landscape consultant.
S. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City’s landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of the proposed retaining wall with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an offset manner, to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited.
T. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings,
10 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition.
The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC).
Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the RHMC, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation.
U. The retaining walls shall not exceed five feet in height at any point along the walls and shall have an average height of two and one-half feet.
V. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required.
W. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any of improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness.
X. There shall be no discarding of any debris, trash, soil and construction spoils or any other material into the canyon or deposited anywhere on the property, including easements.
No grading, planting, structures, drainage devices or hardscape, including driveways, or storage of any objects including building materials shall take place in the easements, unless approved by the RHCA.
Y. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City.
Z. During construction, the site shall be maintained in a safe manner so as not to threaten the health, safety, or general welfare of the public.
AA. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
BB. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for
11 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times.
CC. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
DD. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies.
EE. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions.
FF. Storm water shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
GG. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
HH. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution.
II. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank.
JJ. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any.
12 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
KK. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan.
LL. This Resolution’s approvals shall not be effective until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions set forth herein.
MM. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department.
NN. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
OO. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
PP. The outdoor kitchen and related structures located in the side yard setback shall be removed from the development plan prior to submittal to the building plan check.
QQ. The applicant shall lower the elevation of the building pad, finished floor, and roof ridges by 18 inches, and submit revised development plans to the City Planning Department for review and approval in accordance with this condition prior to submittal to building plan check.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF APRIL, 2026.
BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
____________________________________
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
13 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
14 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-05 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-37 FOR A
SITE PLAN REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE,
ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40% DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY; AND FINDING THE PROJECT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 4 SPUR LANE (LUKIC) (LOT 11-B-CH) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 21, 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Cardenas, Kirkpatrick, Chair Chelf
NOES:
ABSENT: Soo, Douglass
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
__________________________________
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-37 FOR A SITE PLAN
REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE, ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40% DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 SPUR LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA, 90274, AND
FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 11- B-CH) (LUKIC)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Luis de Moraes of Envirotechno Architecture Inc, on behalf of the property owners Mr. Neb Lukic and Jennifer Lukic ("Applicants"), with respect to real property located at 4 Spur Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 11-B-CH) requesting a site plan review to demolish an existing 3,525-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 5,837-square-foot single-family residence and attached garage in a similar footprint, and construct maximum five-foot-high retaining walls in the rear portion of the building pad and in the side yards, expand the existing residential building pad to 13,780 square feet, conduct 5,230 cubic yards of non-exempt grading, a new 1,010-square-foot swimming pool, and 34-square-foot pool equipment. The project requires a new main driveway and removal of the existing driveway.
The project also includes 34-square-foot pool equipment, 453-square feet of attached covered porches, 166-square-foot barbecue, 130 CY export (exempt), and 123-square foot service yard, which are not subject to discretionary review. A variance is requested to exceed the 40% maximum disturbance. The applicants originally requested a 1,585-square-foot stable and driveway access in the rear portion of the property; however, this was withdrawn from the project.
Section 2. The existing single-family residence was built in 1951, and in 1962, the Planning Commission approved a variance for an addition to a single-family residence.
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its morning field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 16, 2024.
Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on January 5, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings.
Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal. The Planning Commission opened the meeting, took public testimony, and continued the public hearing to a later date. The Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant on revising the plans to decrease the amount of grading for the Project. The Planning Commission
2 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
directed the applicants to bring the project back when the relocated driveway and apron in the relocated easements were approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). On February 22, 2024, the RHCA approved the relocation of the driveway and apron on Spur Lane.
The applicants were granted access to use the RHCA easement for the newdriveway and apron.
The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its field trip meeting and regular meeting on March 19, 2024. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on March 6, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented at the public hearing from all persons interested in affecting said proposal.
Section 4. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission held a special meeting to review the two new proposed driveways and aprons. The main driveway apron is located on Spur Lane and the secondary driveway to the stable is located on Cinchring Road. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission approved the main driveway and denied the secondary driveway for stable access. The Traffic Engineer did not recommend the secondary driveway due to safety and drainage concerns. The Traffic Commission directed staff to work with the applicants to consider alternative locations for the secondary driveway for stable access. The applicants decided to remove the stable and secondary driveway from the project at this time.
Section 5. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area excluding the roadway easement is 1.08 acre (47,063 square feet). Currently, there is only one building pad that exists on the property. The project includes an existing 7,260-square-foot building pad near the front of the property closest to the street. The existing residence is located 14-feet from the front roadway easement, 25-feet from the west side property line, and 24 from the east side property line. The rear property line is located downslope of the building pad over 288 feet to the south.
The current residence encroaches into the 30-foot front setback by 10 feet.
Section 6. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages , carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the demolition of a residence and construction of a new single-family residence and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303.
Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The site has already been graded and existing structures are on site.
Section 7. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for demolition of an existing residence and for the construction of a new 4,870-square-foot residence and attached 967- square-foot garage pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A), for a retaining wall above three feet in height pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.190(F), a 1,010-square-foot swimming pool pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A)2.b for swimming pool/spa more than 800-square-feet, expansion of existing residential building pad to 13,780-square-feet, and for non-exempt grading totaling 5,230 CY including 130 CY of export (exempt) pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A).
3 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance.
The proposed development, which includes demolition and construction of a residence and grading is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance, subject to a site plan review. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, lowdensity residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The new residence will be built on the existing 7,260-square-foot building pad that be enlarged to 13,780-square-feet, expanded 60 feet, and the existing grade will be lowered 7-feet in depth, which will reduce the visual impact. The site plan review for the retaining walls not to exceed the 5-foot maximum height along the southwest corner of the residence.
The new residence meets the requirements for reduced setbacks on a smaller lot.
According to RHMC Section 17.24.045, reduced setbacks may apply to properties in the RAS1 zoning district that have a lot area of 1.25 acres or less, excluding roadway easements. As such, the new residence will have a 30-foot front yard setback.
The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 47,063-square feet or 1.08 acres per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 7,941 square feet or 16.86% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; the total flatwork coverage proposed is 6,585-square-feet or 13.99%, and the total lot coverage proposed, including structural & flatwork, would be 14,818 square feet or 31.49% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to be 29,880 square feet or 63.49% (40% permitted). The disturbed area exceeds the maximum 40% permitted by 23.49%. The applicant has requested a Variance to exceed the disturbance limitations to 29,880 square-feet or 63.49%.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the proposed grading and retaining wall for development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the grading and retaining wall allows the proposed construction to be constructed largely on an existing building pad which enables proposed project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. The existing building pad is relatively small at 7,260-square-feet, the RHMC requires a minimum 12,000-square-footbuilding pad. The enlargement of the building pad to 13,780-square-feet, 60-foot expansion, and lowering the pad by 7-feet in depth will level and even out the lot for the new residence, swimming pool/spa, driveway, and amenities.
The applicants are proposing to remove the existing driveway on Spur Lane located on the northeastern side of the property and construct a new driveway on the northwestern side of the
4 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
property. The new garage will be located at the northeastern portion of the parcel. The new driveway will be 90 feet long by 22 feet wide extending to the new garage.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.
The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project from Spur Lane as it utilizes the enlarge and expand the existing building pad and has a similar footprint to the existing residence. The existing driveway will be relocated to the northwest portion of the lot and repaved to align with the new garage. The swimming pool/spa will be located at the edge of the expanded residential building pad. The retaining walls have been designed to support the expanded building pad.
D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls).
A landscape plan has been prepared to for compliance with water efficient landscape ordinance requirements and low impact development standards. The landscape plan will introduce additional landscaping, which will be compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. The grading and retaining wall are designed to preserve existing topography where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area.
Grading consists of 2,680 CY of cut and 2,550 CY of fill with 130 CY export (exempt). The grading and retaining walls are designed to preserve slopes where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course.
Grading will be done to improve the residential building pad, driveway and walkways throughout the site. Drainage will not change and will follow the natural drainage courses of the lot.
G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas.
Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected and new landscaping will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community.
5 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Landscaping will provide a buffer or transition between various pads on the property. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors.
H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
The garage has been relocated to the northeast portion of the parcel and the garage access is reoriented to the west. The new driveway is accessible from the relocated apron at the northeast corner of the parcel, extends 22 feet wide by 90 feet long at the north end of the parcel.
The new driveway and apron will provide better circulation and parking for the property owners' family and guests. An adequate pathway is proposed to safely accommodate pedestrians around the residence to the backyard and the rear of the property. Adequate walkways will be provided to the pool and deck.
I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the construction of a new single-family residence, swimming pool, retaining walls, and associated grading. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
Section 8. Variance. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting variances to for the development to exceed the maximum 40% of the net lot area as identified in Section 17.16.170, Section 17.16.150(B). With respect to the request for variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.
There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. The residence was developed prior to the City's incorporation and has a legal nonconforming front yard setback of 30 feet which may continue pursuant to Section 17.24.045. However, the small lot size and location of the building pad near the street are exceptional circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is warranted due to the unique sloping topography that does not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity. The existing building pad is 7,260 square feet, and in order for the lot to conform to the minimum 12,000 building pad size, additional disturbance of 6,520 square feet will be added for a total of 13,780-square-foot building pad.
6 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question.
Granting the requested variance are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights on the property. The existing main building pad is too small, therefore a larger building pad which requires additional disturbance of 23% will accommodate a new residence, garage, driveway, swimming pool, and improvements. Other properties inthe vicinity enjoy these types of improvements.
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Granting the variances to exceed the maximum allowable 40% disturbance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity; a new residence, garage, driveways, swimming pool/spa, and other improvements are allowed in the Rolling Hills community. Further, the project will be consistent with other developments in the area.
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed.
The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the proposed construction complies with the low-profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an overbuilt look. The lot is sufficient to accommodate the proposed use.
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant.
Granting the requested variance allows a new single family home similar to others enjoyed by many properties throughout the City. The project, together with the variances, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan.
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
7 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Granting the variance will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which allows and encourages residential uses and property improvements. It will further the lowprofile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over-built look.
Section 9. Approval Conditions. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 26-37 subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections.
B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlements granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee's determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant's request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to RHMC Chapter17.58.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.
8 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.
Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in mature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. The applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required.
E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith .
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 7,934 square feet or 16.86% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum).
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 14,519 square feet or 30.85% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% maximum).
H. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and corral area shall not exceed 63.49%, or 29,880 square feet surface area. Grading for this project shall not exceed 2,680 CY of cut and 2,550 CY of fill for a total of 5,230 cubic yards with 130 CY export (exempt).
I. The residential building pad is proposed at 13,780 square feet and shall not exceed coverage of 7,803 square feet or 56.63% with allowed deductions. The set aside pad for a future stable and corral is proposed at 1,000 square feet.
J. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the apron of the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope.
K. Access to the set aside area for the future stable and corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; the access route shall not be wider than 12 feet.
9 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
L. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department.
M. Per LA County Building Code, a pool barrier and/or fencing shall be required for the pool.
N. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements .
0. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190.E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32).
P. All utility lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section17.27.030.
Q. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared.
R. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City's landscape consultant.
S. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City's landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of the proposed retaining wall with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an offset manner, to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited.
T. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings, subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition.
10 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC).
Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the RHMC, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation .
U. The retaining walls shall not exceed five feet in height at any point along the walls and shall have an average height of two and one-half feet.
V. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required.
W. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any of improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City's Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness.
X. There shall be no discarding of any debris, trash, soil and construction spoils or any other material into the canyon or deposited anywhere on the property, including easements.
No grading, planting, structures, drainage devices or hardscape, including driveways, or storage of any objects including building materials shall take place in the easements, unless approved by the RHCA.
Y. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City.
Z. During construction, the site shall be maintained in a safe manner so as not to threaten the health, safety, or general welfare of the public.
AA. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall berequired.
AB. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4' wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times.
11 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
AC. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
AD. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies.
AE. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions .
AF. Storm water shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors ' view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
AG. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
AH. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution.
AI. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality ControlBoard and County Health Department requirements forthe installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank.
AJ. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any.
AK. Prior to final inspection of the project, "as graded" and "as constructed" plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition , any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan.
12 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
AL. This Resolution's approvals shall not be effective until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions set forth herein.
AM. All conditions of this Resolution , when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department.
AN. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section
17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
AO. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney's fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
AP. The outdoor kitchen and related structures located in the side yard setback shall be removed from the development plan prior to submittal to the building plan check.
AQ. The applicant shall lower the elevation of the building pad, finished floor, and roof ridges by 18 inches, and submit revised development plans to the City Planning Department for review and approval in accordance with this condition prior to submittal to building plan check.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF APRIL, 2026.
BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
13 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
§§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-05 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-37 FOR A SITE PLAN
REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE, ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40% DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY; AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 4 SPUR LANE (LUKIC) (LOT 11-B-CH)
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 21, 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Cardenas, Kirkpatrick, Chair Chelf
NOES:
ABSENT: Soo, Douglass
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 23-10026-37 FOR A SITE
PLAN REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE, ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40%
DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 SPUR LANE, ROLLING HILLS, CA, 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 11- B-CH) (LUKIC)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Luis de Moraes of Envirotechno Architecture Inc, on behalf of the property owners Mr. Neb Lukic and Jennifer Lukic ("Applicants"), with respect to real property located at 4 Spur Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 11-B-CH) requesting a site plan review to demolish an existing 3,525-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 5,5355,837-square-foot single-family residence and attached garage in a similar footprint, and construct maximum five-foot-high retaining walls in the rear portion of the building pad and in the side yards, expand the existing residential building pad to 13,780 square feet, conduct 5,230 cubic yards of non-exempt grading, a new 1,010-square- foot swimming pool, and 34- square-foot pool equipment. The project requires a new main driveway and removal of the existing driveway. The project also includes 34-square-foot pool equipment, 453-square feet of attached covered porches , 166-square-foot barbecue, 130 CY export (exempt), and 123-squarefoot service yard, which are not subject to discretionary review. A variance is requested to exceed the 40% maximum disturbance and 35% total lot coverage. The applicants originally requested a 1,585-square-foot stable and driveway access in the rear portion of the property; however, this was withdrawn from the project.
Section 2. The existing single-family residence was built in 1951, and in 1962, the Planning Commission approved a variance for an addition to a single-family residence .
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its morning field trip meeting and regular meeting on January 16, 2024.
Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on January 5, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the agent was in attendance at the hearings.
Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal. The Planning Commission opened the meeting, took public testimony, and continued the public hearing to a later date. The Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant on revising the plans to decrease the amount of grading for the Project. The Planning Commission
2 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
directed the applicants to bring the project back when the relocated driveway and apron in the relocated easements were approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). On February 22, 2024, the RHCA approved the relocation of the driveway and apron on Spur Lane.
The applicants were granted access to use the RHCA easement for the newdriveway and apron.
The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its field trip meeting and regular meeting on March 19, 2024. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on March 6, 2024. The applicants and agent were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented at the public hearing from all persons interested in affecting said proposal.
Section 4. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission held a special meeting to review the two new proposed driveways and aprons. The main driveway apron is located on Spur Lane and the secondary driveway to the stable is located on Cinchring Road. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission approved the main driveway and denied the secondary driveway for stable access. The Traffic Engineer did not recommend the secondary driveway due to safety and drainage concerns. The Traffic Commission directed staff to work with the applicants to consider alternative locations for the secondary driveway for stable access. The applicants decided to remove the stable and secondary driveway from the project at this time.
Section 5. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area excluding the roadway easement is 1.08 acre (47,063 square feet). Currently, there is only one building pad that exists on the property. The project includes an existing 7,260-square-foot building pad near the front of the property closest to the street. The existing residence is located 14-feet from the front roadway easement, 25-feet from the west side property line, and 24 from the east side property line. The rear property line is located downslope of the building pad over 288 feet to the south.
The current residence encroaches into the 30-foot front setback by 10 feet.
Section 6. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages , carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the demolition of a residence and construction of a new single-family residence and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303.
Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The site has already been graded and existing structures are on site.
Section 7. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for demolition of an existing residence and for the construction of a new 4,7804,870-square-foot residence and attached 665967- square-foot garage pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A), for a retaining wall above three feet in height pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.190(F), a 1,010-square-foot swimming pool pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020(A)2.b for swimming pool/spa more than 800-squarefeet, expansion of existing residential building pad to 13,780-square-feet, and for non-exempt grading totaling 5,230 CY including 130 CY of export (exempt) pursuant to RHMC Section
3 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
17.46.020(A).
With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance.
The proposed development, which includes demolition and construction of a residence and grading is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance, subject to a site plan review. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, lowdensity residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The new residence will be built on the existing 7,260-square-foot building pad that be enlarged to 13,780-square-feet, expanded 60 feet, and the existing grade will be lowered 7-feet in depth, which will reduce the visual impact. The site plan review for the retaining walls not to exceed the 5-foot maximum height along the southwest corner of the residence.
The new residence meets the requirements for reduced setbacks on a smaller lot.
According to RHMC Section 17.24.045, reduced setbacks may apply to properties in the RAS1 zoning district that have a lot area of 1.25 acres or less, excluding roadway easements. As such, the new residence will have a 30-foot front yard setback.
The project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 47,063-square feet or 1.08 acres per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 7,941 square feet or 16.86% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; the total flatwork coverage proposed is 6,6256,585-square-feet or 14.0813.99%, and the total lot coverage proposed, including structural & flatwork, would be 14,56614,818 square feetor 31.5931.49% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to be 29,880 square feet or 63.49% (40% permitted). The disturbed area exceeds the maximum 40% permitted by 23.49%. The applicant has requested a Variance to exceed the disturbance limitations to 29,880 square-feet or 63.49%.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the proposed grading and retaining wall for development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the grading and retaining wall allows the proposed construction to be constructed largely on an existing building pad which enables proposed project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. The existing building pad is relatively small at 7,260-square-feet, the RHMC requires a minimum 12,000-square-footbuilding pad. The enlargement of the building pad to 13,780-square-feet, 4060-foot expansion, and lowering the pad by 7-feet in depth will level and even out the lot for the new residence, swimming pool/spa, driveway, and amenities.
The applicants are proposing to remove the existing driveway on Spur Lane located on the
4 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
northeastern side of the property and construct a new driveway on the northwestern side of the
4 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
property. The new garage will be located at the northeastern portion of the parcel. The new driveway will be 90 feet long by 22 feet wide extending to the new garage.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences.
The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project from Spur Lane as it utilizes the enlarge and expand the existing building pad and has a similar footprint to the existing residence. The existing driveway will be relocated to the northwest portion of the lot and repaved to align with the new garage. The swimming pool/spa will be located at the edge of the expanded residential building pad. The retaining walls have been designed to support the expanded building pad.
D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls).
A landscape plan has been prepared to for compliance with water efficient landscape ordinance requirements and low impact development standards. The landscape plan will introduce additional landscaping, which will be compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. The grading and retaining wall are designed to preserve existing topography where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area.
Grading consists of 2,680 CY of cut and 2,550 CY of fill with 130 CY export (exempt). The grading and retaining walls are designed to preserve slopes where possible and mimic the natural terrain.
F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course.
Grading will be done to improve the residential building pad, driveway and walkways throughout the site. Drainage will not change and will follow the natural drainage courses of the lot.
G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas.
Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected and new landscaping will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community.
5 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Landscaping will provide a buffer or transition between various pads on the property. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors.
H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles.
The garage has been relocated to the northeast portion of the parcel and the garage access is reoriented to the west. The new driveway is accessible from the relocated apron at the northeast corner of the parcel, extends 22 feet wide by 90 feet long at the north end of the parcel.
The new driveway and apron will provide better circulation and parking for the property owners' family and guests. An adequate pathway is proposed to safely accommodate pedestrians around the residence to the backyard and the rear of the property. Adequate walkways will be provided to the pool and deck.
I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes the construction of a new single-family residence, swimming pool, retaining walls, and associated grading. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
Section 8. Variance. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting variances to for the development to exceed the maximum 40% of the net lot area as identified in Section 17.16.170, Section 17.16.150(B). With respect to the request for variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone.
There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. The residence was developed prior to the City's incorporation and has a legal nonconforming front yard setback of 30 feet which may continue pursuant to Section 17.24.045. However, the small lot size and location of the building pad near the street are exceptional circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is warranted due to the unique sloping topography that does not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity. The existing building pad is 7,260 square feet, and in order for the lot to conform to the minimum 12,000 building pad size, additional disturbance of 6,520 square feet will be added for a total of 13,780-square-foot building pad.
6 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question.
Granting the requested variances are necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of property rights on the property. The existing main building pad is too small, therefore a larger building pad which requires additional disturbance of 23% will accommodate a new residence, garage, driveway, swimming pool, and improvements. Other properties inthe vicinity enjoy these types of improvements.
C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
Granting the variances to exceed the maximum allowable 40% disturbance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity; a new residence, garage, driveways, swimming pool/spa, and other improvements are allowed in the Rolling Hills community. Further, the project will be consistent with other developments in the area.
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed.
The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the proposed construction complies with the low-profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an overbuilt look. The lot is sufficient to accommodate the proposed use.
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant.
Granting the requested variance The construction in the side setback allows a new single family home similar to others enjoyed by many properties throughout the City. The project, together with the variances, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan.
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
7 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Granting the variance will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which allows and encourages residential uses and property improvements. It will further the lowprofile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over-built look.
Section 9. Approval Conditions. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 23-10026-37 subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections.
B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlements granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee's determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant's request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to RHMC Chapter17.58.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on March 19, 2024 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan.
All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.
8 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.
Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in mature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. The applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required.
E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith .
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 7,9417,934 square feet or
16.8716.86% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum).
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 14,56614,519 square feet or 30.9530.85% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% maximum).
H. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and corral area shall not exceed 63.49%, or 29,880 square feet surface area. Grading for this project shall not exceed 2,680 CY of cut and 2,550 CY of fill for a total of 5,230 cubic yards with 130 CY export (exempt).
I. The residential building pad is proposed at 13,780 square feet and shall not exceed coverage of 7,8107,803 square feet or 56.6856.63% with allowed deductions. The set aside pad for a future stable and corral is proposed at 1,000 square feet.
J. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the apron of the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope.
K. Access to the set aside area for the future stable and corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; the access route shall not be wider than 12 feet.
9 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
L. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department.
M. Per LA County Building Code, a pool barrier and/or fencing shall be required for the pool.
N. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements .
0. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190.E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32).
P. All utility lines shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section17.27.030.
Q. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared.
R. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City's landscape consultant.
S. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City's landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of the proposed retaining wall with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an offset manner, to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited.
T. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings, subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition.
10 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC).
Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the RHMC, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation .
U. The retaining walls shall not exceed five feet in height at any point along the walls and shall have an average height of two and one-half feet.
V. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required.
W. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any of improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City's Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness.
X. There shall be no discarding of any debris, trash, soil and construction spoils or any other material into the canyon or deposited anywhere on the property, including easements.
No grading, planting, structures, drainage devices or hardscape, including driveways, or storage of any objects including building materials shall take place in the easements, unless approved by the RHCA.
Y. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City.
Z. During construction, the site shall be maintained in a safe manner so as not to threaten the health, safety, or general welfare of the public.
AA. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall berequired.
AB. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4' wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times.
11 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
AC. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
AD. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestoscontaining materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies.
AE. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions .
AF. Storm water shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors ' view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system.
AG. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
AH. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution.
AI. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality ControlBoard and County Health Department requirements forthe installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank.
AJ. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any.
AK. Prior to final inspection of the project, "as graded" and "as constructed" plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition , any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan.
12 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
AL. This Resolution's approvals shall not be effective until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions set forth herein.
AM. All conditions of this Resolution , when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department.
AN. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section
17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
AO. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney's fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition.
AP. The outdoor kitchen and related structures located in the side yard setback shall be removed from the development plan prior to submittal to the building plan check.
AQ. The applicant shall lower the elevation of the building pad, finished floor, and roof ridges by 18 inches, and submit revised development plans to the City Planning Department for review and approval in accordance with this condition prior to submittal to building plan check.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF APRIL, 2026.
BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
13 Resolution No. 2026-05 (ZC 26-37)
4 Spur Lane (Lukic)
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
§§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2026-05 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 26-37 FOR A SITE PLAN
REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING PAD, CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE, ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40% DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY; AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR LOCATION AT 4 SPUR LANE (LUKIC) (LOT 11-B-CH)
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 21, 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Cardenas, Kirkpatrick, Chair Chelf
NOES:
ABSENT: Soo, Douglass
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK
From: Benjamin Johnson
To:
Cc: Planning
Subject: RE: Board of Directors
Date: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 7:50:56 AM
Good morning Mr. Crocker,
Thank you for the email! Your public comment has been received and will be entered into the record.
Respectfully
--
Benjamin Johnson
Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician
Planning and Community Services
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills CA 90274
Office Phone: 310.377.1521 Extension 300
Email: [email protected]
From: DONALD CROCKER
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2026 3:51 PM
To: Kristen Raig
Subject: Board of Directors
Re hearing April 21 please show Crocker strong support for owners proposal. The existing improvements have been a fire trap and eyesore to its neighbors and if geology acceptable we support. Don and Mary Lou Crocker 14 Cinchring since 1972. Thanks Sent from my iPhone
April 18, 2026
Rolling Hills Planning Commission
2 Portuguese Bend Rd.
Rolling Hills CA 90274
Subject: Concerns Regarding Residential Construction in Landslide Area Zoning Case #26-37 – 4 Spur Lane
Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
We are writing to express our strong concerns about zoning case #26-37, a residence at 4 Spur Lane, which is in an area known to be susceptible to landslides. We believe this project, as approved, will have a significantly negative effect on drainage and soil erosion, and may intensify land movement, any of which would impact neighboring properties & public infrastructure.
This project was approved before the land movement which damaged sections of Quail Ridge Rd South and Cinchring Rd. Homes on these streets as well as Spur Lane suffered notable damage and required significant repairs. In fact, an invasive crack resulted from the land movement on Quail Ridge Rd South and affected a property there which connects to Spur Lane, west of #4.
Currently, #2 Spur Lane is working to repair cracks in their foundation and install a number of caissons on their property to prevent further damage.
Based on publicly available information and the area’s documented geological history, this site appears to fall within a zone that has experienced slope failure and major soil movement in the recent past. This project, as approved, raises safety concerns for neighboring properties and public infrastructure including but not limited to increased drainage and erosion, and slope destabilization. What remedies are included in the approved project plans to remove potential impacts to surrounding properties & infrastructure?
Specifically, we have the following concerns:
1. We question the adequacy and scope of any geotechnical investigation conducted for this project, if it was done before the land began moving or during the time of recordable land movement.
2. It is unclear whether there is currently a drain inlet on Spur Lane or not. If not, we are very concerned about the inlet noted on the project plans, and if that will receive runoff from the entire street. We are very concerned about the expected increase in water runoff from approximately 10,000 – 12,000 square feet (or more) of new roof and hardscape proposed in this project.
3. We are very concerned that the project plans wrongly show the drainage location in the easement. The RHCA Board approval called out that the drain pipe and riprap (drain outlet) were to be moved out of the easement. (See RHCA BOD Minutes 02.22.2024 Approved)
Given these concerns, we respectfully request the following:
1. We ask that the Planning Commission require a new, comprehensive and independent geological study of the project and property. Please detail how the analysis fully accounts for worst-case scenarios, including heavy rainfall, land movement and seismic activity, and long-term soil degradation.
2. We ask that the Planning Commission review the RHCA license agreement for a driveway and drainage for this project, to verify the plans correctly reflect the Board approval requirements. If the plans do not, we request that the Planning Commission require amended plans to be drawn to accurately reflect the approved drainage position.
3. We would like to suggest the Planning Commission review the drainage system approved for the project at 23 Crest East, which includes two storm-drain storage tanks sized to capture additional runoff, and consider this enhancement for the 4 Spur Lane project, due to its involvement in a landslide-prone area and addition of a new drain inlet at the street level.
Approving development in a high-risk landslide area without thorough review and safeguards could have serious consequences. We urge you to carefully consider whether approval of this project, in its current form, is appropriate given the known risks and ask that you take full advantage of every tool in your tool box to preserve the physical environment of properties on Cinchring, Rd., Quail Ridge Rd. South and Spur Lane before making a final decision on this proposal.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Dustin & Melissa McNabb
James C. Bellis
3 Quail Ridge Rd. S.
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
April 21, 2026
City of Rolling Hills
Planning Commission
2 Portuguese Bend Rd
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Dear Planning Commission:
I have asked repeatedly (and to no avail) for the City Council and Planning Commission to consider a building moratorium for areas in the vicinity of the “new” Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex. I now ask that the Planning Commission stop issuing variances for lot coverage and building size. Applicants almost always ask for these variances and they are granted. My concern is that construction creates land disturbance which may be contributing to the movement of the landslide complex. Every effort should be made by the City to follow existing rules and limit the amount of land that is disturbed during and after construction. My neighbors at 2 Quail Ridge S. were granted several variances and soon after construction of their complete remodel (down to the studs) began, a leak developed in my water line within the foundational slab of my house. I could feel vibrations in the ground as they jack-hammered on the property above us.
Not only do these variances for larger structure footprints contribute to more land disturbance but the developments’ increased impervious surfaces contribute to increased run-off. Tennis/basketball courts, larger remodels and expansions with larger roof areas, barns, guest houses, driveways, paved patios, etc., all contribute to a larger impervious footprint. The impervious footprints cause rainfall to run-off and flow faster, with greater force into canyons through and downstream of Rolling Hills and eventually into the toe and abutment areas of the Portugues Bend Landslide Complex. It has been documented by geological engineers that the new land movement seen in Rolling Hills is caused by the shifting buttress of earth down in Palos Verdes. Sending more and more water into that area is causing saturation and erosion and is negatively affecting not only Palos Verdes but Rolling Hills residents as well - - we are shooting ourselves in the foot, literally.
I invite you all to please come to 3 Quail Ridge Rd. S. and tour the crack yourselves and get a first-hand look at what is going on. Please consider your constituents both within and beyond the City’s boundaries and stop issuing variances - - or at least try to be more conservative and selective - - with regards to issuing variances for increased lot coverage and impervious surfaces like that of 4 Spurr Lane. By continually granting variances you set precedence and you further weaken your own regulations, ordinances, and policies. Policies that encourage and incentivize permeable surfaces should be considered1. The residents need you to think of what is best for public safety and the existing properties rather than increasing your budget via more taxable square footage.
Thank you for your time,
James Bellis
1 Pervious (or permeable) surfaces are materials that allow stormwater to infiltrate, percolate, and soak into the underlying soil, reducing runoff, filtering pollutants, and recharging groundwater. Examples include pervious concrete, porous asphalt, interlocking pavers, and gravel. They are key for sustainable development and flood mitigation. (Pineo, 2024)
Permeable vs. Impermeable Surfaces
Written by Rebecca Pineo
October 2024 (original: 2007)
What is the difference between permeable and
impermeable surfaces?
Permeable surfaces (also known as porous or
pervious surfaces) allow water to percolate into the
soil to filter out pollutants and recharge the water
table. Impermeable/impervious surfaces are solid
surfaces that don’t allow water to penetrate, forcing it to run off.
Impermeable
Surfaces
Permeable
Surfaces
Asphalt Planting beds
Concrete Mulch beds
Traditional stone, brick
or concrete
Gravel
pavers Permeable pavers
Turf
What is the impact of impermeable surfaces on
the environment?
Urban and suburban sites typically contain large
expanses of impermeable surface, causing a host of
problems:
● Pollution of surface water. When stormwater
runs off impermeable surfaces, it picks up
pollutants as it flows into storm drains. The
contaminated water then flows directly into
rivers, lakes, wetlands and oceans, generating
problems for biodiversity as well as public
health.
● Flooding of surface water and erosion of
stream banks. During periods of heavy
rainfall, large amounts of impermeable
surfaces generate large amounts of runoff.
This sudden influx of runoff into rivers can
cause flash flooding and erosion of stream
banks.
● Water table is not adequately recharged.
Because impermeable surfaces send rainwater
into storm drains rather than allow it to
percolate down to our aquifers, groundwater
may be used faster than it is recharged.
● Formation of stagnate water puddles. On
impermeable surfaces where runoff has no
drainage route, stormwater can puddle for
long periods of time. Stagnate puddles can
become breeding places for undesirable
insects such as mosquitoes.
● Heat island effect. Due to the heat-absorbing
quality of asphalt and other paving materials,
sites with high ratios of impermeable surfaces
increase ambient air temperatures and require
more energy for cooling.
How can I reduce the amount or effects of
impermeable surfaces?
Provide maximum permeability of surfaces in your
landscape. Replace surfaces in your landscape to
promote maximum permeability.
Least permeable to most permeable surfaces chart
Reduce the environmental impact of impermeable
surfaces through on-site management of stormwater,
such as:
- Rain gardens. Rain gardens, sometimes called
bio-retention areas, are shallow depressions in
the landscape that capture stormwater and
allow it to gradually percolate into the soil.
Planted with moisture-loving plants that help
Permeable vs. Impermeable Surfaces
Written by Rebecca Pineo October
2024 (original: 2007)
What is the difference between permeable and impermeable surfaces? Permeable surfaces (also known
as porous or pervious surfaces) allow water to percolate into the soil to filter out pollutants and recharge
the water table. Impermeable/impervious surfaces
are solid surfaces that dont allow water to penetrate, forcing it to run off.
Impermeable Surfaces Permeable Surfaces
Asphalt Planting beds
Concrete Mulch beds
Traditional stone, brick or concreteGravel
pavers Permeable pavers
Turf
What is the impact of impermeable surfaces on the environment? Urban and suburban sites typically contain
large expanses of impermeable surface, causing
a host of problems:
1. Pollution of surface
water. When stormwater runs off impermeable
surfaces, it picks up pollutants as it flows
into storm drains. The contaminated water then
flows directly into rivers, lakes, wetlands and oceans, generating problems for biodiversity as well
as public health.
2. Flooding of surface water
and erosion of stream banks. During periods of
heavy rainfall, large amounts of impermeable surfaces
generate large amounts of runoff.
This sudden influx of runoff into rivers can cause flash flooding and erosion of stream banks.
1. Water table
is not adequately recharged. Because impermeable
surfaces send rainwater into storm drains rather
than allow it to percolate down to our aquifers, groundwater may be used faster than it is recharged.
2. Formation of stagnate water puddles. On impermeable
surfaces where runoff has no drainage route,
stormwater can puddle for long periods of time. Stagnate puddles can become breeding places for undesirable
insects such as mosquitoes.
3. Heat island
effect. Due to the heat-absorbing quality of asphalt
and other paving materials, sites with high ratios
of impermeable surfaces increase ambient air temperatures and require more energy for cooling.
How can I reduce the amount or effects of impermeable
surfaces? Provide maximum permeability
of surfaces in your landscape. Replace
surfaces in your landscape to promote maximum
permeability.
Reduce the environmental impact of impermeable surfaces through on-site management of stormwater, such
as: - Rain gardens. Rain gardens, sometimes called
bio-retention areas, are shallow depressions in the
landscape that capture stormwater and allow it to gradually percolate into the soil. Planted with moisture-loving
plants that help
filter out pollutants, rain gardens provide an
attractive way to reduce the impact of
stormwater on the environment. For more
information, consult the fact sheet “Rain
Gardens"
- Rain barrels and cisterns. Water tanks stored
above and/or below ground can capture
rainwater from downspouts for later use.
They are available in many styles, materials
and sizes to accommodate a variety of needs.
For more information, consult the fact sheet
“Harvesting Water”
- Green roofs. A green roof is a
specially-engineered rooftop that supports
plant life and captures rainwater before it runs
off. Green roofs have been utilized in Europe
for 30 years and are quickly gaining popularity
in the United States. For more information,
consult the fact sheet “Green Roofs"
- French drains. French drains are ditches
filled with gravel or rock used to capture
stormwater and direct its flow. They can be
utilized on the downslope side of
impermeable surfaces to move runoff to an
area where it can infiltrate the soil.
Permeable Paving Systems
Permeable pavers are specially fabricated paving units
designed to replace asphalt and other impermeable
paving materials. Interconnected pore spaces within
the material channel water into the underlying soil or
into a special storage layer which forces slow
percolation during periods of heavy rainfall.
Permeable pavers are often laid on a bed of sand or
gravel to enhance drainage properties.
Examples of permeable paving systems
● Grid of concrete pavers and void space filled
with turf, sand or gravel
● Aggregate of large stone particles and
concrete with interwoven pore spaces
● Turf system supported by a grid composed of
post-consumer recycled plastic
References
Collins, Kelly. (2007) Permeable Pavement Research.
North Carolina State University. Retrieved
November 9, 2008 from
http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/info/permeable-pa
vement/
Booth, Derek B., Jennifer Leavitt, and Kim Peterson.
(Unknown date). The University of
Washington Permeable Pavement
Demonstration Project: Background and
First-Year Field Results. Center for Urban
Water Resources Management, Department of
Civil Engineering, University of Washington.
Retrieved November 9, 2008 from
http://depts.washington.edu/cuwrm/researc
h/rc3.pdf
Balogh, Anne. (2008). Permeable Surfaces: A Hot
New Installation Segment. Landscape Online.
February 2008.
Retrieved November 9, 2008 from
http://www.landscapeonline.com/research/ar
ticle/10426
University of Washington. (Unknown Date). Center
for Water and Watershed Studies. University
of Washington. Retrieved December 4, 2008
from http://depts.washington.edu/cuwrm/
This information is brought to you by the University of Delaware Cooperative Extension, a service of the UD College of Agriculture and Natural Resources — a land-grant institution. This institution is an equal opportunity provider.
filter out pollutants, rain gardens provide an attractive way to reduce the impact of stormwater on
the environment. For more information, consult the
fact sheet
Rain Gardens" Rain barrels and cisterns.
Water tanks stored above and/or below ground
can capture rainwater from downspouts for later
use. They are available in many styles, materials
and sizes to accommodate a variety of needs.
For more information, consult the fact sheet
Harvesting
Water
Green roofs. A green roof is
a specially-engineered rooftop that supports plant
life and captures rainwater before it runs off. Green
roofs have been utilized in Europe for 30 years
and are quickly gaining popularity in the United
States. For more information, consult the fact
sheet
Green Roofs" - French drains. French
drains are ditches filled with gravel or rock used
to capture stormwater and direct its flow. They
can be utilized on the downslope side of impermeable
surfaces to move runoff to an area where
it can infiltrate the soil.
Permeable Paving Systems
Permeable pavers are specially fabricated paving
units designed to replace asphalt and other
impermeable paving materials. Interconnected
pore spaces within the material channel
water into the underlying soil or into a special
storage layer which forces slow percolation
during periods of heavy rainfall. Permeable
pavers are often laid on a bed of sand
or gravel to enhance drainage properties. Examples
of permeable paving systems ﾮ Grid of
concrete pavers and void space filled with turf,
sand or gravel e Aggregate of large stone particles
and concrete with interwoven pore spaces
Turf system supported by a grid composed of
post-consumer recycled plastic
References
Collins, Kelly. (2007) Permeable Pavement Research. North Carolina State University. Retrieved November 9, 2008
from http:/ /www.bae.ncsu.edu/info/permeable-pa vement/ Booth, Derek B., Jennifer Leavitt, and Kim Peterson.
(Unknown date). The University of Washington Permeable
Pavement Demonstration Project: Background
and First-Year Field Results. Center for Urban
Water Resources Management, Department of Civil
Engineering, University of Washington. Retrieved November 9, 2008 from http://depts.washington.edu/cuwrm/researc
h/rc3.pdf Balogh,
Anne. (2008). Permeable Surfaces: A Hot New Installation Segment. Landscape Online. February 2008. Retrieved
November 9, 2008 from http:/ /www.landscapeonline.com/resea ticle/10426 University
of Washington. (Unknown Date). Center for Water
and Watershed Studies. University of Washington. Retrieved December 4, 2008 from http://depts.washington.edu/cuwrm/ This information is brought to you by the University of Delaware Cuooperative Extension, a service of the UD College of Agriculture and Natural Resources a land-grant institution. This institution is an equal opportunity provider.
LUKIC RESIDENCE 4 SPUR LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 PROJECT INFORMATION TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90505 3635 NEWTON STREET OCCUPANCY: R-3/U LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ADDRESS: ARCHITECT: ZONE: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: PROJECT V-B RAS-1 CONTACT: ENVIROTECHNO ARCHITECTURE, INC. OWNER: MR. LUIS DE MORAES, AIA VOICE: (310) 377-7873 EMAIL: [email protected] CONSULTANTS FULLY SPRINKLERED MR. & MRS. LUKIC 2105 RUHLAND AVENUE REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 4 SPUR LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 PORTION OF LOT 11 RECORD OF SURVEY, MB 57, 35/36 APN: 7582-011-028 ABBREVIATIONS AIR CONDITIONING ACOUSTICAL ABOVE FIN. FLOOR ALUMINUM AT BUILDING BRUSHED CEMENT CEILING CLEAR OPENING CONSTRUCTION NOTE COLUMN CONCRETE CONTINUOUS CONTRACTOR CERAMIC TILE DETAIL DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIAMETER DIMENSION DOOR DISHWASHER DRAWING ELEVATION ELECTRICAL ELEVATOR ENVIROTECHNO EXISTING FLOOR DRAIN FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIRE HOSE CABINET FINISH FACE FINISH A/C ACOUS. A.F.F. ALUM. @BLDG. BR. CEM. CLG. CL. OPNG C.N. COL. CONC. CONT. CONTR. C.T. DET. D.F. DIA. DIM. DR. DW. DWG. ELEV. ELEC. ELEVAT. ET. EXIST. F.D. F.E. F.H.C. F.F. FIN. FLOOR FLOURESCENT FACE OF STUD FABRIC WALLCOVERING GAUGE GALVANIZED GARBAGE DISPOSAL GLASS GRANITE TILE GYPSUM BOARD HARDWOOD HARDWARE HOLLOW METAL HEIGHT HEATING, VENTILATING LAVATORY MAXIMUM METAL MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MIRROR MARBLE TILE MULLION MICROWAVE NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE OVER ALL ON CENTER PARTITION PLASTIC LAMINATE POLISHED PAIR QUARRY TILE FLR. FLOUR. F.O.S. F.W.C. GA. GAL. GD. GL. G.T. GYP. BD. HDWD. HDWR. H.M. HGT. H.V.A.C. LAV. MAX. MTL. MFG. MIN. MIR. M.T. MUL. MW. N.I.C. N.T.S. O.A. O.C. PART. P.L. POL. PR. Q.T. PLASTIC LAMINATE POLISHED PAIR QUARRY TILE RADIUS REFRIGERATOR/FREEZER REFERENCE REQUIRED ROOM RESTROOM SEPARATE CIRCUIT SECTION SHEET SIMILAR SPECIFICATIONS STOVE/RANGE STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD SUSPENDED TRASH COMPACTOR TO BE DETERMINED TELEPHONE THICK TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VERTICAL VERIFY IN FIELD VOLTS VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VINYL SHEET FLOORING VINYL WALL COVERING WITH WALL COVERING P.L. POL. PR. Q.T. RAD. R/F REF. REQ. RM. R.R. S.C. SECT. SHT. SIM. SPECS. S/R S. STL. STD. SUSP. T.C. TBD. TELE. THK. TYP. U.N.O. VERT. V.I.F. VOL. V.C.T. V.S.F. V.W.C. W/ WC. PROJECT DATA VICINITY MAP SYMBOLS WINDOW NUMBER DOOR NUMBER PLUMBING FIXTURE ELEVATION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER ROOM NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER PF-00 PC-00 PLUMBING CONTROL REVISION CLOUD 1 KEY NOTES ROOM NAME
1 1 100 NAME PROJECT SITE NORTH NTS RICHIE-BRAY, INC. 904 SILVER SPUR ROAD #395 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CA 90274 PH: (310) 377-5868 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BOLTON ENGINEERING CORP. 25834 NARBONNE AVE. SUITE 210 LOMITA, CA 90717 PHONE: (310) 325-5580 FAX: (310) 325-5581 CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYING: ENVIROTECHNO ARCHITECTURE INCORPORATED 116 SOUTH CATALINA AVE. # 102 REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 LUIS DE MORAES, AIA-ASID-LEED AP BD+C PHONE: (310) 379-9716 EMAIL: [email protected] ARCHITECT: SCOPE OF WORK NEW SINGLE FAMILY MAIN RESIDENCE: 4,870 SQ.FT. WITH 3 CAR ATTACHED GARAGE: 967 SQ.FT. MAIN RESIDENCE AREA: 5,837 SQ.FT. SWIMMING POOL AND SPA, COVERED PATIO, BAR-B-QUE/BAR AREA, FIRE PIT, PATIOS HARDSCAPE, GARDEN WALLS, AND DRIVEWAY AND MOTOR COURT SHEET INDEX GENERAL SHEETS CS-1 COVER SHEET CS-2 PLATE HEIGHT CALCULATION PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE C-0 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS C-2 SITE SECTIONS C-3 COLOR CUT AND FILL MAP ARCHITECTURAL A-0.0 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN A-1.0 SITE PLAN A-3.0 MAIN RESIDENCE FLOOR PLAN A-6.0 MAIN RESIDENCE ROOF PLAN A-7.0 MAIN RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS A-7.1 MAIN RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY:
SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
COVER SHEET - PROJECT INFO. CS-1
HALLWAY ENTRY FOYER
HALLWAY
CLOSET
HALLWAY 3-CAR GARAGE BATH #1 BATH #2 DINING DRIVEWAY MASTER BEDROOM MASTER BATH CLOSET BEDROOM #1 BEDROOM #2 HALLWAY W.I.C. (HERS) BEDROOM #3 W.I.C. (HIS) COVERED PATIO POWDER LINEN BAR KITCHENLIVING PANTRY BATH #4 LAUNDRY ENTRY WINE CELLAR BEDROOM #4 CLOSET CLOSET HALLWAY BATH #3 HALLWAY W.I.C. TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 9'-7" LENGTH = 16'-1" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 9'-7" LENGTH = 16'-1" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 10'-1" LENGTH = 16'-7" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 9'-8" LENGTH = 12'-8" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 9'-4" LENGTH = 27'-10" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 8'-0" LENGTH = 20'-0" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 8'-0" LENGTH = 116'-2" TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 8'-5" LENGTH = 7'-3" PLATE HEIGHT CALCULATION PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" NORTH PLATE HEIGHT CALCULATIONS MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE RESIDENCE MUST HAVE PLATE HEIGHTS OF 8'6” OR LOWER UP TO 30% OF THE RESIDENCE MAY HAVE A PLATE HEIGHT UP TO 9'6 ONLY 20% OF THE RESIDENCE MAY HAVE A PLATE HEIGHT UP TO 10'6 (20'+116.17'+33.5'+7.25') = 176.92' = 67% (27.82'+12.67'+16.08'+16.08') = 72.65' = 27% (16.58') = 16.58' = 6% TOTAL TOP PLATE LINEAR LENGHT = (20'+116.17'+33.5'+7.25'+27.82'+12.67'+16.08'+16.08'+16.58') = 266.15' = 100% TOP OF PLATE HEIGHT = 8'-0" LENGTH = 33'-6" LINEAR FEET OF TOP OF PLATE AT EACH HEIGHT RANGE % OF 266.15' JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY:
SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
PLATE HEIGHT CALCULATION
PLAN CS-2
2 1
3 5
4 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14 15
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
19 18
17 16
«
7567-017-0337567-017-0327567-017-0317567-017-0347567-017-0107567-017-047 7567-017-011
7567-017-027
7567-017-043
1 ID No. Address/APN
23456
79 10
11 8
12 151617
7567-017-040
#5 CINCHRING ROAD#2 SPUR LANE#9 QUAIL RIDGE ROAD#4 SPUR LANE#7 CINCHRING ROAD 7567-017-041
#11 QUAIL RIDGE ROAD
7567-017-012
#24 CINCHRING ROAD#26 CINCHRING ROAD
ID No. Address/APN
«
#11 CINCHRING ROAD#13 CINCHRING ROAD#16 CINCHRING ROAD
7567-017-042
#14 CINCHRING ROAD
7567-017-028
#10 CINCHRING ROAD
7567-017-030
#12 CINCHRING ROAD
7567-017-029
#8 CINCHRING ROAD
1314
#6 CINCHRING ROAD7567-011-016#52 PORTUGUESE BEND7567-011-015#7 CREST ROAD EAST7567-011-014#5 CREST ROAD EAST7567-011-027#1 CREST ROAD EAST 1819
7567-017-0517567-017-0527567-017-048#4 CINCHRING ROAD#2 CINCHRING ROAD 202122
#2 CREST ROAD WEST
23 7567-017-023
#3 SPUR LANE
24 7567-017-018
UTILITY-CALWATER
25 7567-017-022
#1 SPUR LANE
26 7567-017-021
#10 CREST ROAD WEST
27 7567-017-036
#8 QUAIL RIDGE ROAD
28 7567-017-01929 7567-017-020
#2 QUAIL RIDGE ROAD#1 QUAIL RIDGE ROAD
20 20 40
20 ENGINEERING CORP.
boltonengineering.com | 310.325.5580
C0
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
INDEX OF SHEETS:
C0 PROPOSED SITE PLANC1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONSC2 SITE ECTIONSC3 COLOR CUT AND FILL MAP OVERALL SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'
VICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 500'
LEGENDACRONYMS
Total Lot Coverage
LP
LP
LP
PL
R LANE
20 20 40
20 ENGINEERING CORP.
boltonengineering.com | 310.325.5580
C1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SCALE: 1" = 20'
LEGEND
ENGINEERING CORP.
boltonengineering.com | 310.325.5580
SITE SECTION A-ASCALE: 1" = 10'
C2
20 20 40
20 ENGINEERING CORP.
boltonengineering.com | 310.325.5580
COLOR CUT AND FILL MAPSCALE: 1" = 20' C3
LEGEND
EARTHWORK ESTIMATE
25'
PORTION OF LOT 11
SPUR LANE
#4 SPUR LANE
RHCA EASEMENT
25'
RHCA EASEMENT
25'
RHCA EASEMENT
25' RHCA EASEMENT
30' RHCA EASEMENT
10'
30' RHCA EASEMENT
1255
1258
1260
1265
1270
1275
1280
1285
1290
1295
1300
1305
1250
1245
1240
1235
1230
1225
125520
1310 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTH
30'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
25'-0" RHCA EASEMENT
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK
25'-0" RHCA EASEMENT
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK
30'-0" ROAD EASEMENT
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
20'-0"
25'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
RHCA EASEMENT
40'-0" RHCA ROAD EASMENT EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STONE PATIO TO BE REMOVED - TYP. EXISTING STONE PLANTERS TO BE REMOVED - TYP. EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED - TYP. EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED - TYP. EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED - TYP. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED - VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED - TYP.EXISTING SHED TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WOOD WALLS TO BE REMOVED - VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EXISTING WOOD WALLS TO BE REMOVED - VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED - CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS - TYP. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED - VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOTES: 1. SEE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN A-0.0
SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" NORTH LEGEND HARDSCAPE 1235 1235 EXISTING & NATURAL CONTOUR LINES NEW CONTOUR LINES ENTRY FLOOR PLAN FUTURE STABLE GARAGE DRAINAGE FLOW LINE NEW DRIVEWAY 6'-0" HIGH W.I. FENCE AT PROP. LINE TYP. RAILING BP - BOTTOM OF POOL EC - EDGE OF COPING FG - FINISHED GRADE FS - FINISH SURFACE NG - NATURAL GRADE TCT - TOP OF COUNTERTOP TC - TOP OF CURB TD - TRENCH DRAIN TF - TOP OF FENCE TG - TOP OF GATE TP - TOP OF PILASTER TR - TOP OF RAIL TT - TOP OF TRELLIS TW - TOP OF WALL PROPERTY MARKER 2 SPUR LANE PORTION LOT 12 R.S. 57-35-36 25'
SPUR LANE
RHCA EASEMENT
25'
RHCA EASEMENT
25'
RHCA EASEMENT
25' RHCA EASEMENT
30' RHCA EASEMENT
10'
30' RHCA EASEMENT
1255
1258
1260
1265
1270
1275
1280
1285
1290
1295
1300
1305
1250
1245
1240
1235
1230
1225
125520
1310
30'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
25'-0" RHCA EASEMENT
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK
25'-0" RHCA EASEMENT
50'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK
30'-0" ROAD EASEMENT
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
20'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
20'-0"
25'-0"
SIDE YARD
SETBACK
RHCA EASEMENT
40'-0" RHCA ROAD EASMENT FUTURE STABLE LOCATION FUTURE STABLE ACCESS NOTES: 1. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS, FINISHED GRADE, FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATIONS, AND GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION AND DETAILS NOTES 1. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS, FINISHED GRADE, FINISHED
SURFACE ELEVATIONS, AND GRADING AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION AND DETAILS 63'-3"
42'-4"
53'-0"
266'-9"
301'-0"
281'-6"
277'-7" MAIN LEVEL F.F.E. = 1301.0' GARAGE F.F.E. = 1301.0' MAIN RESIDENCE AREA TOTAL LIVING AREA : 4,870 SQ.FT. GARAGE AREA : 967 SQ.FT. TOTAL BUILDING AREA : 5,837 SQ.FT. 20'-1"
20'-1"
20'-1"
38'-4"
41'-3" EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BUILDING TO BE REMOVED POOL EQUIP. TRASH AREA SITE PLAN A-1.0 JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY:
SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
DW GAS FP
HALLWAY
DW
DW ICE BEV WINE ENTRY FOYER
HALLWAY
CLOSET
HALLWAY 3-CAR GARAGE 36'-0" x 25'-0"
OVEN MICRO. REF. REF. 48'-0 1/4" 3'-6" 8'-6" 7'-3" 18'-0" WD 96'-2 1/4" 116'-2 1/4" MAIN RESIDENCE FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH 8'-6" 36'-2" 1"
26'-3" BATH #1 BATH #2 SHOWER 12'-6" X 8'-6" DINING
85'-3"
10'-4" AREA CALCS.: TOTAL LIVING AREA : 4,870 SQ.FT. GARAGE AREA : 967 SQ.FT. TOTAL BUILDING AREA : 5,837 SQ.FT. DRIVEWAY MASTER BEDROOM 15'-0" X 20'-6" SHOWER MASTER BATH 12'-6" X 12'-0" TUB CLOSET BEDROOM #1 12'-0" X 11'-6" BEDROOM #2 12'-6" X 12'-6" 5'-0" X 9'-0" 5'-0" X 9'-0" HALLWAY SHOWER W.I.C. (HERS) BEDROOM #3 10'-0" X 8'-6" W.I.C. (HIS) COVERED PATIO POWDER LINEN 15'-0" X 14'-6" 5'-3" X 5'-0" 28'-0" X 15'-6" 20'-0" X 17'-0" BAR KITCHENLIVING 28'-6" X 15'-6" 28'-6" X 24'-0" 9'-6" X 5'-0" PANTRY BATH #4 7'-6" X 10'-6" 7'-0" X 12'-6" LAUNDRY 8'-6" X 12'-0" ENTRY WINE CELLAR 12'-0" X 12'-6" BEDROOM #4 CLOSET SHOWER 5'-0" X 9'-0" CLOSET HALLWAY BATH #3 HALLWAY 12'-0" X 5'-0" GAS FP GAS FP W.I.C. SHOWER 8'-0" X 5'-0" 3'-0" 17'-0" 20'-0" 9'-6"
4'-2" 4'-2" 1 A-7.0 4 A-7.1 3 A-7.1 2 A-7.0
13'-2 1/2"
1'-6 3/4"
8'-4" 35'-10 3/4" 16'-1 1/4" 16'-7" 12'-7 1/2" 27'-9 1/2" 73'-1 1/4" 39'-7" 23'-8 1/4"
1'-10 1/4"
1'-9"
1'-4 1/2"
85'-3" 39'-2 1/4" 116'-2 1/4" 3'-10 3/4" 1'-0" 3'-0" 40'-9" 33'-6" SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE MAIN RESIDENCE FLOOR PLAN A-3.0 JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY:
SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
MAIN RESIDENCE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH
1 A-7.0
4 A-7.1
3 A-7.1
2 A-7.0
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12
SLOPE
3:12 AREA CALCS.: TOTAL LIVING AREA : 4,870 SQ.FT. GARAGE AREA : 967 SQ.FT. TOTAL BUILDING AREA : 5,837 SQ.FT. SIDE YARD SETBACK LINE FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE MAIN RESIDENCE ROOF PLAN A-6.0 JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY:
SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
8'-0"
8'-6"
8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
9'-4" 10"
1'-0"
10'-6" 1301.00 ENTRY & GARAGE LEVEL F.F.E.
8'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 12
3 12
3 12
3 9'-6"
2"
9'-4"
8'-0"
8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
9'-8"
10'-1" 1301.00 ENTRY & GARAGE LEVEL F.F.E. WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 8'-0"
8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
8'-0"
MAIN RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS A-7.0 JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
8'-0"
8'-0"
9'-6"
10'-6"
8'-0" 1301.00 ENTRY & GARAGE LEVEL F.F.E. EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
8'-0"
8'-0"
9'-4"
9'-8"
10'-1"
9'-7"
8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
8'-0"
10'-4"
8'-0"
9'-7" 1301.00 ENTRY & GARAGE LEVEL F.F.E.SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 12
3 12
3 12
3 8'-6"
9'-6"
10'-6"
8'-0" JOB NO: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN BY: SHEET TITLE: CHECKED BY: 21-015 SG, ENM LDM 10-12-2022 AS NOTED PLANNING SET - 03/29/2024 3635 Newton Street Torrance, California 90505 Tel: 310/379-9716 e-mail: [email protected] website: envirotechno.com ENVIROTECHNO INTERACTIVE ARCHITECTURE + INTERIOR DESIGN SHEET NO:
PROJECT TITLE: CLIENT NAME:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 ARCHITECTURAL STAMP:
LUKIC RESIDENCE
4 SPUR LANE
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 A-7.1
MAIN RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS
Agenda Item No.: 9.A
Mtg. Date: 03/19/2024
TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: JOHN SIGNO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY SERVICES THRU: KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 23-100: SITE PLAN REVIEW TO DEMOLISH AN
EXISTING RESIDENCE, EXPAND THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PAD,
CONSTRUCT A NEW RESIDENCE, ATTACHED GARAGE, SWIMMING
POOL, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), NON-EXEMPT GRADING, AND
OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE 40%
DISTURBANCE FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 SPUR LANE,
ROLLING HILLS, CA, 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 11-B-CH) (LUKIC)
DATE: March 19, 2024
BACKGROUND:
This item is continued from the Planning Commission meeting on January 16, 2024. That morning, the Planning Commission held a public meeting field trip at 4 Spur Lane. The Planning Commissioners, Staff, and attendees viewed the silhouettes of the proposed project.
The proposed project was presented later that night at the evening Planning Commission Meeting at 6:30 p.m. The Planning Commissioners voted 3-0 (2 Commissioners were absent) to continue the item to the next meeting. The Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant on revising the plans to decrease the amount of grading for the Project. The Planning Commission directed the applicants to bring the project back when the relocated driveway and apron in the relocated easements were approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA).
The project was not presented at the February 19, 2024 Planning Commission meeting because the applicant needed more time to address the issues regarding the barn location on Cinchring, secondary stable driveway and access on Cinchring Road, grading, and approval of the relocated driveway from the northeast to the northwest portion of the driveway. It was critical for the approval of relocated driveway in the RHCA easement, because if it was denied, then the entire project would have to be redesigned.
1
On February 22, 2024, the RHCA approved the relocation of the driveway and apron on Spur Lane. The applicants were granted access to use the RHCA easement for the new driveway and apron.
On March 7, 2024, the project was re-noticed for the March 19, 2024 Planning Commission morning Field Trip and Public Hearing.
Zoning, Location, and Lot Description
The property located at 4 Spur Lane is zoned RAS-1 and has a net lot area of 1.08 acre (47,063 square feet). Currently, there is only one building pad on the property developed with a 3,525-square-foot single-family residence and 536-square-foot attached garage. The residence was built in 1951 and is currently vacant. In 1962, the Planning Commission approved a variance for an addition.
The existing residence is located 14 feet from the front roadway easement, 25 feet from the west side property line, and 24 from the east side property line. The rear property line is located downslope of the building pad over 288 feet to the south. There is an existing 25-foot RHCA easement that extends along the west and south property lines. There is s 20-foot road easement located at the north of the parcel on Spur Lane, and 30-foot road easement at the southeast corner of the parcel on Cinchring Road. There is one building pad and the existing topography of the project site slopes down approximately 300 feet from the rear elevation to the lowest portion of the lot.
Applicant Request
On August 24, 2023, an application was filed by the applicant, Luis De Moraes, on behalf of the property owners Jennifer and Nebojsa Lukic to request a site plan review to demolish the existing residence and attached garage and construct a new 4,870-square-foot single-family residence and 967-square-foot garage with a new driveway and apron.
The proposed project includes a 1,010-square-foot swimming pool, 480-square-feet of attached covered porches, 168-square-foot pavilion, 166-square-foot barbecue, maximum five-foot high retaining walls, 123-square-foot service yard, hardscape, landscape, and other amenities. The proposed project will expand the existing residential building pad for the new swimming pool and amenities, and includes a new walkway/stairway that will descend down the slope to the new pavilion. The project will relocate the existing driveway on Spur Lane from the northeast side to the northwest side of the property within an easement management by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). The new garage will be located at the northeast portion of the parcel and oriented toward the side property line requiring a curved driveway that slopes downward from the street. the driveway will be 22 feet wide maximum with a 29-foot-wide apron.
The project will expand the building pad from 7,260 square feet to 12,152 square feet by extending the southern portion of the existing building pad approximately 90 feet.
Traffic Commission Review of Driveways
The applicant proposed two new driveways: (1) main driveway on Spur Lane and (2) secondary driveway to a stable located on Cinchring Road. On December 11, 2023, the Traffic Commission held a meeting and the Traffic Engineer recommended approval of the main driveway but not the secondary driveway due to safety and drainage concerns. The secondary driveway is on a sharp curve with existing guardrails that would have to be removed or 2
relocated. The Traffic Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval to the City Council of the main driveway on Spur Lane but not the secondary driveway for the stable on Cinchring Road.
The applicants at this time have decided to remove the secondary access, barn, and driveway from Cinchring Road form the project approval.
On February 22, 2024, RHCA approved the relocation of the driveway and apron on Spur Lane. The applicants were granted access to use the RHCA easement for the new driveway and apron on Spur Lane.
DISCUSSION:
Since the January 16th Planning Commission meeting, the applicants have revised the project and RHCA has granted approval for the relocated driveway and apron in the easement. The revised project is summarized as follows:
1. Raised pad approximately 1 foot and 6 inches
2. Reduced disturbed area by 2,090 sq.ft. Current proposed 29,880 sq.ft. (63.49%) vs. 31,970 sq.ft.(67.9%) previously.
3. Reduced total grading by 2,850 cubic yards. Current total grading proposed: 4,750 cy now vs. 7600 cy previously.
4. Moved entire building northeast (towards Spur Lane) by 7 feet and 7 inchesÂ.
5. Increased garage area by 302 sq.ft.
6. Extended garage length by 11 feet and 6 inchesÂ, which increased total plate height length 8 feet and 6 inches or lower by 4%.
7. Raised entre building by 1 foot and 6 inches.
8. Raised garage finished floor elevation by 6 feetÂ.
9. Removed pavilion.
10. Removed barn, driveway, and driveway approach from Cinchring Road.
Setbacks
The new residence meets the requirements for reduced setbacks on a smaller lot. According to RHMC Section 17.24.045, reduced setbacks may apply to properties in the RAS-1 zoning district that have a lot area of 1.25 acres or less, excluding roadway easements. This property has a lot area of 1.23 acres (excluding roadway easements).
Site Plan Review
The applicants are requesting a Site Plan Review (SPR) to demolish a residence and construct a new 4,780-square-foot residence, attached 665-square-foot garage, 1,010-squarefoot swimming pool, maximum 5-foot-high retaining walls, 22-foot-wide driveway, and other improvements.
Non-exempt grading
The applicants are requesting a total of 4,750 cubic yards (CY) of grading, including 2,375 CY cut and 2,375 CY fill balanced onsite. The 245 CY of excavation for the swimming pool is exempt and could be exported from the site without relief from the Code. Grading is needed to expand the existing building pad, and support the new driveway, swimming pool, staiway yard area, and retaining walls. Included are 640 CY of over-excavation and 880 CY of recompaction. The grading from the cut for the residence, garage, and driveway will be used to fill and expand the existing building pad for the swimming pool/spa, deck, and stairs to the fire pit. The 205 cubic yards of excavation for the swimming pool is exempt and could be exported, but it will be balanced onsite.
3
Retaining Walls
All of the existing walls on the subject property will be demolished. The project includes twoand-one-half-foot-high retaining walls along the northwestern portion of the property supporting the new driveway. A new retaining wall is proposed along the eastern portion of the residence that extends down to the new stairway and fire pit. The project includes retaining walls at the southern portion of the residential building pad that will extend from the pavilion, stairway, fire pit, swimming pool and around to the west portion of residence. The maximum height of the retaining walls is five feet and the average height is not to exceed two and onehalf feet.
Retaining walls (maximum 3-feet in height) are located north along both sides of the driveway leading to the garage. The double walls are located at the north portion of the driveway closer to Spur Lane and there is a single wall on the southside of the driveway leading to the garage.
Retaining walls located east perimeter of expanded building pad, double wall at the corner by the outdoor kitchen
Retaining walls located south portion of the expanded building pad, stair way, fire pit, infinity edge pool, and south east corner of main residence (section max height 5-feet) Retaining walls located on west side of main residence within the limit of grading.
Variance
The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to exceed the 40% disturbance.
MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE
Lot Coverage
The existing structural coverage with deductions is 4,115 square feet (SF) or 8.74%. The proposed structural coverage on the lot will be 3,819 SF or 8.11% of the lot, the total structural coverage is 7,934 square feet or 16.86%, which is less than the lot coverage limitation of 20% maximum.
The existing flatwork is 6,670 SF or 14.36%. The total proposed flatwork is -175 SF or -.37%, for a total flatwork coverage of 6,585 square feet or 13.99%, and this is below the maximum allowable 15% flatwork coverage.
The proposed total coverage including structures and flatwork will be 14,519 SF or 30.85% of the lot area, which below the 35% maximum
structural and flatwork coverage.
Building Pad
The existing building pad area (Building Pad 1) is relatively small at 7,260-square-feet, the RHMC has a 12,000-square-foot building pad area guideline. The enlargement of the building pad area to 13,380-square-feet, 40-foot expansion, and lowering the pad by 7-feet in depth will level and even out the lot for the new residence, swimming pool/spa, driveway, and amenities.
The existing building structural coverage is 4,115 square feet or 56.68%, and the project proposes to add 3,688 square feet or 26.76% building structural coverage, for a total of 7,803 or 53% building structural coverage. The Project exceeds the minimum 30% building pad coverage guideline by 23% percent.
4
The Project proposes a future building pad (Pad 2) for the future 1,100 square-foot set aside area. Building Pad #2 has a 1,100 square foot area with a future proposed 450 square foot stable. The total building pad coverage is 40.91%. This exceeds the maximum 30% Building pad coverage guideline by 10.91%.
Setbacks
The existing residence encroaches into the 30-foot front setback. The new residence complies with all of the development standards in the municipal code: 30-foot front setback, 20-foot side setback, and 50-foot rear setback.
Future 1,000 square foot set aside area
The applicants have proposed a 1,000 square foot (450 stable & 550 corral) set aside area that located at the south portion of the parcel. The set aside area is accessible from the newly relocated driveway at the northwest corner of the parcel on Spur Lane. The future stable access is 10 feet wide and extends 280 feet along the west property line and 20-foot RHCA easement.
Area of Disturbance
The project site has been previously disturbed due to development of the existing residence.
The existing disturbance is 16,460 SF or 34.97%. The proposed project will add 13,420 SF or
28.51% of disturbance for a total of 29,880 SF, or 63.49% of the net lot area. The applicants are requesting a variance to exceed the maximum.
Height
The finished height of the proposed new residence is a maximum of 15 feet. The proposed ridgeline of the new residence will be lower due to the lowering of the existing grade by 7 feet.
Swimming Pool
The proposed swimming pool is 1,010 SF and located behind the proposed residence at the edge of the extended building pad. The pool will be designed to have an infinity edge in which water flows into a surge basin. The edge of the pool and building pad will be supported by retaining walls. Approval of a swimming pool greater than 800 SF requires a discretionary approval. The applicants have requested an approval of Site Plan Review for the proposed pool.
Landscaping
A Preliminary Landscape Plan has been included in the plans. There are existing trees front of the property that are protected and will remain. The project proposes 17,786 SF of existing landscaping to be altered (re-landscaped) and 39,883 SF of new areas to be landscaped. The Plan is being reviewed by the City’s landscape consultant for compliance with water efficiency requirements. The Planning Commission should consider if conditions are necessary to limit the height of trees to protect neighboring views.
Environmental Review
The proposed project has been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment 5
and is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines, which exempts a single-family residence, swimming pool, and accessory structures.
Public Participation
Staff has not received any concerns.
CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
17.46.50 Required Site Plan Review findings.
1. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Site Plan Review application.
2. No project which requires Site Plan Review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made:
3. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance;
4. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot;
5. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences;
6. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls);
7. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area;
8. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course;
9. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas;
10. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and
11. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
12. If all of the above findings cannot be made with regard to the proposed project, or cannot be made even with changes to the project through project conditions imposed by City staff and/or the Planning Commission, the site plan review application shall be denied.
CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES
17.38.50 Required Variance findings.
In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings:
1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone;
2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question;
3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity;
4. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; 6
5. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant;
6. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and
7. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, discuss the proposed project, and provide direction to staff and applicants. A resolution is provided in case the Commission wishes to approve the project with conditions.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: PL_ADR_4SpurLn_ZC23-100_240111_PC_VicinityMap.pdf Attachment 2: 240306_4SpurLane_Development Table (ZC23-100)_2nd.pdf Attachment 3: 2024-03_PC_Resolution_4SpurLane_ZC 23-100_Lukic_F.pdf Attachment 4: CL_AGN_240116_PC_BlueFolderItem_10B_PublicComment01.pdf Attachment 5: 240304_4SpurLane_RHCA_EasementApproval.pdf Attachment 6: 240312_4SpurLane_ZC23-100_Plans_6thSubmittal.pdf 7
James C. Bellis
3 Quail Ridge Rd. S.
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
[email protected]
(909) 855-7868
May 20, 2026
City of Rolling Hills
City Council
2 Portuguese Bend Rd
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Dear City Council:
I was very disappointed with the Planning Commission and the way they handled the re-application for the variances at 4 Spur Lane. Several comments were made by the Commissioners which did not address or answer any community concerns but gave the developer and his engineers all the credibility, and the Commission agreed to approve the application. The reasoning for allowing the project to move forward was that since the County intends to approve the grading and soils plan (not yet approved), the Commission must agree with the County’s review and that of the engineering “experts” hired by the developer of 4 Spur Lane. Their decision also appeared rely on the developer’s statements about how he is a self-made man, how long the process has taken, and how much money he has had to spend before even breaking ground. What I learned from the meeting was that if I need the Commission to approve any excessive variance(s), all I need is to pay good money to some engineers to push my project in the right direction and have a sob-story about spending undue money and time on my project. The Commission stated that their hands were basically tied with the findings from the County and the engineers.
The Commission also stated that because the application was previously reviewed and the application date had simply expired, it was more of a formality with the Commission to get it approved.
I would like to address and for the City Council to consider four major items that were brought to the attention of, but not addressed, by the Commission:
1. Approval of building footprint variance. The whole purpose of the Planning Commission is to adhere to the development and zoning codes of the city. As stated on the Rolling Hills City website, “The Planning Commission regulates land use in the City in order to preserve the physical environment and human needs of the residents and owners of land in the City.” If they have any power in their positions as commissioners, it is to deny a project that does not conform to development codes. It is very simple to deny a project that does not conform to development codes; just don’t approve it right out of the gate and don’t lead on the developer with variance options. I have worked in urban and regional planning (City of Rialto, Big Bear Lake Municipal Water District) since 2005 and a commission or committee that follows established development codes accomplishes three major objectives:
i. reinforces staff recommendations, which greatly improves staff morale, ii. follows the existing law and minimizes liability,
iii. strengthens existing development codes by setting precedence of following the government rules.
You weaken your own laws by continually approving variances for non-conforming developments. The Planning Commission or City Council may simply act and say, “Sorry, we have to stand by our development code and deny such variances.” Furthermore, these are not small variances - - in all my years of working at planning and project management, I have never seen a project asking for ~63% lot coverage (especially on an acre lot!). For comparison, the Rialto, CA development code for R-4 (MAXIMUM HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE) has a building footprint not to exceed 60% of total lot area1. The Commission is allowing Rolling Hills to develop at a rate higher than that of Rialto’s multi-family apartment zones. At no time did the Committee address the excess square footage of 4 Spur Lane’s building footprint (which was the main topic of my first letter (attached herein).
1 City of Rialto Municipal Code, California. Title 18 Zoning, Chapter 18.24.030(F). (2025).
2. Expiration of Application. The developer was determined to blame LA County for the slow processing of his grading permit and the expiration of the application with Rolling Hills. Regardless of fault, it is not reasonable for the Commission to take an expired application and say that it was already reviewed and simply approve it.
Applications have expiration limitations for a reason – to re-review the application in its entirety because there can be tremendous changes with the parcel and its vicinity in two years. This application is a perfect example of why they should be re-reviewed after their expiration as there is a LANDSLIDE that has developed directly adjacent to the property; the neighboring property owners had to restructure their foundation because the landslide crack is going through their house, the property below continues to battle drainage issues from above which may be influencing the continued land movement, and the land in the vicinity of the project continues to move and has not stopped. It does not take a licensed civil engineer to measure and photograph the crack’s movement over two years and prove its direction and rate of movement - - there is no doubt my personal photos, measurements, and documentation of the crack expanding though my property would hold up in a court of law.
3. Drainage/Cistern Design. The presentation did not contain any specifics on the drainage septic/tank/cistern design. I am still unsure if there is both a cistern and septic, or if the septic is designed to catch drainage runoff as well, or what the exact size of that apparatus will be - - 1,200 cubic feet and 12,000 cubic feet numbers were both stated for the proposed capacity. The Commission said they must side with the experts (engineers and LA County review) that this method will create a safe way to handle run-off. But it appears they are just containing and directing run-off until it overflows the cistern and then piping the overflow to the end of the property. When the run-off reaches the end of the property, it would flow into the McNabb’s property (11 Quail Ridge Rd S) with considerably more force due to the steep slope, containment, and piping. What were the details of the hydrologic study for that area of 4 Spur Rd? Where is the expert engineer’s report that says a 12,000 (or 1,200) cubic foot cistern will contain enough rainwater from an average storm? What about a 10-Year, 30-Year, and 100-Year storm? No attention or discussion was given by the Commission to how that run-off is handled once it leaves the property; their only concern was for the “safety” of the property at 4 Spur. The impacts to other properties were not addressed at any point, even after public comments indicating concern about run-off.
This was not discussed and no detail was shown, but it was agreed by the Commission that it is a great addition to the project and that was enough to cover their concerns.
I attempted to contact Los Angeles County Building and Safety to review a copy of the grading and drainage plan and Mr. Anthony Wong corresponded over several emails. LA County will not release the files for public review or comment; all the County’s grading reviews are strictly ministerial and internal. Mr. Wong said the City of Rolling Hills oversees approving or denying the application, including the grading plan. When asked how the County is handling the increase run-off from the increased impervious surfaces of the development, Mr. Wong stated, “when an increase in impervious area is being proposed on a lot that naturally drains to a neighboring property or area, we require the project engineer to determine how to address the issue and show to us that the project will not result in a negative impact compared to the existing condition.” I asked Mr. Wong, “What methodology do you use to determine a project will result in "no negative impacts compared to the existing condition?" to which the County has had no response as of the date of this letter. I include this conversation because there is a tremendous amount of grey area as to how the “expert engineers” calculate risk and negative impacts. The City of Rolling Hills is putting the onus on the County’s/Developer’s engineers for the safety of the development’s grading and drainage without there being clear procedures or policies at the engineering level.
4. Additional Ordinances to Limit Impervious Surfaces. My first letter (attached herein) included a short publication from the University of Delaware on permeable vs. impermeable surfaces and provided methods and types of permeable surfaces to help retain and limit run-off. The Commission has the legal obligation to review, create, and propose updates to the development code to be adopted by City Council. This is generally the whole point of a planning commission – not to grant variances but to update and create a development code to address defects and outdated material in the old code and update the code to include mechanisms to better protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. The Commission said nothing to address the direction of the development code to review and consider some smart planning strategies to increase permeable surfaces in future developments, let alone for the development at 4 Spur Rd.
My requests are simple: I ask the City Council to thoroughly review and scrutinize the Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve the application for 4 Spur Rd, reject any variances, allow the grading and drainage plan to be publicly reviewed, and limit the development to conform to current development codes.
Thank you for your consideration,
James Bellis
3 Quail Ridge Rd. S.
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Enclosed: Initial Letter to Planning Commission Regarding 4 Spur Rd.
University of Delaware Publication: Permeable vs. Impermeable Surfaces April 21, 2026
City of Rolling Hills
Planning Commission
2 Portuguese Bend Rd
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Dear Planning Commission:
I have asked repeatedly (and to no avail) for the City Council and Planning Commission to consider a building moratorium for areas in the vicinity of the “new” Portuguese Bend Landslide Complex. I now ask that the Planning Commission stop issuing variances for lot coverage and building size. Applicants almost always ask for these variances and they are granted. My concern is that construction creates land disturbance which may be contributing to the movement of the landslide complex. Every effort should be made by the City to follow existing rules and limit the amount of land that is disturbed during and after construction. My neighbors at 2 Quail Ridge S. were granted several variances and soon after construction of their complete remodel (down to the studs) began, a leak developed in my water line within the foundational slab of my house. I could feel vibrations in the ground as they jack-hammered on the property above us.
Not only do these variances for larger structure footprints contribute to more land disturbance but the developments’ increased impervious surfaces contribute to increased run-off. Tennis/basketball courts, larger remodels and expansions with larger roof areas, barns, guest houses, driveways, paved patios, etc., all contribute to a larger impervious footprint. The impervious footprints cause rainfall to run-off and flow faster, with greater force into canyons through and downstream of Rolling Hills and eventually into the toe and abutment areas of the Portugues Bend Landslide Complex. It has been documented by geological engineers that the new land movement seen in Rolling Hills is caused by the shifting buttress of earth down in Palos Verdes. Sending more and more water into that area is causing saturation and erosion and is negatively affecting not only Palos Verdes but Rolling Hills residents as well - - we are shooting ourselves in the foot, literally.
I invite you all to please come to 3 Quail Ridge Rd. S. and tour the crack yourselves and get a first-hand look at what is going on. Please consider your constituents both within and beyond the City’s boundaries and stop issuing variances - - or at least try to be more conservative and selective - - with regards to issuing variances for increased lot coverage and impervious surfaces like that of 4 Spur Lane. By continually granting variances you set precedence and you further
weaken your own regulations, ordinances, and policies. Policies that encourage and incentivize permeable surfaces should be considered2. The residents need you to think of what is best for public safety and the existing properties rather than increasing your budget via more taxable square footage.
Thank you for your time,
James Bellis
2 Pervious (or permeable) surfaces are materials that allow stormwater to infiltrate, percolate, and soak into the underlying soil, reducing runoff, filtering pollutants, and recharging groundwater. Examples include pervious concrete, porous asphalt, interlocking pavers, and gravel. They are key for sustainable development and flood mitigation. (Pineo, 2024)
May 25, 2026
Rolling Hills City Council
2 Portuguese Bend Rd. Rolling Hills CA 90274
Subject: Land Movement Area Zoning Case #26-37
Dear Rolling Hills City Council Members,
We are writing to state our concerns about the Planning Commission approval of Zoning Case #26-37 (ZC26-37). We were deeply troubled by the absence of documented evidence submitted at the Planning Commission public hearing on April 21, 2026, and shocked the Planning Commission ignored the unresolved contradictions and unsupported claims presented, in its approval.
As it was a de novo hearing, the Commission had an obligation to make findings based on accurate and reliable information. However, that was not the case and it raises significant concerns such as:
1. The site plans submitted were over 2 years old and contradict previous approvals, e.g. showing a drain pipe and outlet in the easement. The contract planner repeatedly claimed the plans “just needed reapproval” while both the architect and the project civil engineer admitted that there had been changes. (The architect and engineer had updated copies at the hearing but they were not shared). Why were the updated plans not included for the record?
2. Drainage plan information was conflicting. Though we were pleased to hear the architect and project civil engineer note an upgraded storage tank had been added, the engineer on 3 different occasions claimed different capacities for the overflow storage system. No evidentiary reports were submitted for projected runoff and no evidence was presented showing that the storage tank capacity was sufficient for 50- or 100-year stormwater runoff.
3. The construction of a new stormwater runoff inlet between 2 & 4 Spur Lane has been inserted into the remodeling plans. The CCRs clearly require the Association to ascertain that any new channel is adequate to carry the amount of stormwater liable to flow therein and provide approval in writing. No such calculations or written approval were submitted into the record.
The staff report included tonight for this project answers some questions, but just like the Planning Commission, it asks us to accept sweeping conclusions without recorded evidence or even basic factual support and we reject the false urgency included therein.
For the reasons cited above, we respectfully ask the City Council to consider remanding ZC26-37 back to the Planning Commission for evaluation of new evidence such as up-to-date site plans, copies of project geotechnical reports, the project drainage plan and the RHCA license agreement defining the approved rights for this project.
Thank you for yourtime and consideration of this matter and for your efforts to keep Rolling Hills safe for everyone.
Sincerely,
Dustin & Melissa McNabb