Roseville City Council
August 3, 2022

July 2022
The project site is identified by Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 046-060-034. The City of Roseville General Plan designates the SRMC as Business Professional (BP) and the campus is zoned PD457.

More specifically, the project site is located at 12 Medical Plaza Drive and the approved MOB 7 project is located at 7 Medical Plaza Drive. The sites 0.94-acre and measure 1.64 acres, respectively (see Figure 2). The former location, which would be used to develop the proposed Parking Garage Expansion, is located west of Medical Plaza Drive and consists of a surface parking lot, light poles, and landscaped areas. The latter location, which would be used to develop the approved Medical Office Building (MOB 7), is currently developed to the east of Medical Plaza Drive with a surface parking lot, light poles, landscaped areas, and a temporary modular building and sterilization trailer. In addition, the MOB 7 site includes a portion of the Medical Drive Plaza right-of-way (ROW).

Medical Plaza Drive bisects the two sites. With respect to the project site (12 Medical Plaza), surrounding existing uses include the existing five-story SRMC parking garage to the north; the site for MOB 7 and commercial uses (i.e., Holt Orthodontics, Worth Orthodontics, Roseville Dental Group, Serenity Oral Surgery and Implant Center, Rai Care Center, Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, and Roseville Diagnostic Hearing Center, Inc.) to the east, across Medical Plaza Drive; associated SRMC buildings (MOB 8) and surface parking to the south; and associated SRMC buildings (MOB 3) to the west.

With respect to 7 Medical Plaza Drive, surrounding existing uses include an associated SRMC building (MOB 4) and surface parking to the to the north; multi-family residences (The Phoenician Apartments) to the east; the aforementioned commercial uses (i.e., Holt Orthodontics, Worth Orthodontics, Roseville Dental Group, Serenity Oral Surgery and Implant Center, Rai Care Center, Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, and Roseville Diagnostic Hearing Center, Inc.) to the south; the existing five-story SRMC parking garage, MOB 3, and the site for the proposed Parking Garage Expansion to the west, across Medical Plaza Drive; and an associated SRMC building (MOB 5) to the northwest.

Project Components
The proposed project would consist primarily of the Parking Garage Expansion. In addition, the project would include new utility improvements and new landscaping. Finally, the project would require City of Roseville approval of a Design Review Permit. The various project components are discussed below.

Parking Garage Expansion
Following the removal of the existing on-site pavement, parking islands, and landscaping vegetation, the proposed six-story Parking Garage Expansion would be constructed south of the existing five-story parking garage and would connect to the existing parking garage, allowing for access between each structure (see Figure 3). As the existing surface parking lot currently provides a total of 93 parking stalls, including a space for charging an electric vehicle (EV) and 22 stalls complaint with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), development of the Parking Garage Expansion would displace a portion of the existing SRMC parking. In addition, construction of the proposed parking structure would necessitate the removal of a portion of the parking stalls within the existing five-story parking garage, and development of MOB 7 would further remove existing parking on the SRMC campus. However, because the proposed parking structure would result in 551 new parking stalls, including a range of standard, compact, Clean Air/EV, Clean Air, and ADA-compliant spaces, development of the new parking garage would result in a net increase of 345 parking stalls on the SRMC.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 3
Parking Garage Expansion Site Plan
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
The number and type of parking stalls that would be provided on each level of the Parking Garage Expansion are provided in Table 1.

Table 1
Parking Garage Expansion – Parking Count
Level Standard Compact Clean Air/EV Clean Air ADA
1 11 13 34 11 20
2 52 12 28 0 4
3 52 43 0 0 6
4 51 43 1 0 6
5 39 34 1 0 6
6 47 37 0 0 0
The Parking Garage Expansion would emulate the existing aesthetics of structures within the SRMC campus. Exterior finishes would be comprised of painted concrete in tones of beige of brown; concrete panels; and metal finishes (see Figure 4). Accounting for a light pole that would be installed on the sixth level, the new parking garage would be constructed at a height of 75 feet.

Access, Parking, and Circulation
Access to both the MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion sites would be provided by way of Medical Plaza Drive. Motorists would access MOB 7 through the existing entrance on the easterly side of Medical Plaza Drive, and access to the Parking Garage Expansion would be accommodated by the existing entrance immediately north of MOB 8 on the westerly side of the road. The proposed parking structure would allow for two-way travel for motorists circulating within the structure.

The Parking Garage Expansion’s vehicle parking count is discussed above. The proposed parking structure would also provide for short-term bicycle parking, allowing for parking of seven bicycles, as well as an area for long-term bicycle parking, which would provide enough space to park 24 bicycles. In regard to pedestrian access and circulation, the existing sidewalks located adjacent to the site along Medical Plaza Drive would be maintained as part of development.

Utilities
Due to the nature of the proposed project, the Parking Garage Expansion would not require water or sewer service. As shown in Figure 5, a new 12-inch storm drain line would be installed primarily to the west of the proposed parking structure. Runoff from impervious surfaces within the ground floor and around the parking structure would be directed towards on-site inlets, which would collect the flows and release them to the new storm drain line. From the new storm drain line, flows would be released to an existing 12-inch storm drain line west of the Parking Garage Expansion site, which would ultimately discharge to the City’s storm drain system.

Landscaping and Open Space
As shown in Figure 6, the Parking Garage Expansion site would include new landscaping in areas around the proposed structure. The landscaping would consist of various sizes of trees (e.g., Chinese pistache, red oak, prospector elm, Norway maple, incense cedar, atlas cedar, Japanese maple, western redbud, crape myrtle multi-trunk) and site shrubs (e.g., rockrose, golden breath of heaven, giant wild rye, fringe flower, heavenly bamboo, autumn sage, Chinese star jasmine), as well as new streetscape shrubs and groundcovers (e.g., coyote brush, sunset gold breath of heaven, blue chip juniper, ballerina Indian hawthorn, Mexican bush sage). All species would be drought-tolerant.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 4
Parking Garage Expansion Exterior Finishes
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 5
Parking Garage Expansion Utility Plan
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 6
Parking Garage Expansion Landscape Plan
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Requested/Required Entitlements
The proposed project would require the City’s approval of the following discretionary entitlement:
• Design Review Permit.

Pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 19.74.010, a Design Review Permit must be obtained prior to the issuance of a building permit or improvement plan for new construction of commercial projects, as well as for any significant site, circulation, and parking modifications.

Thus, the proposed project would require approval of a Design Review Permit.

C. DISCUSSION
The following section contains substantial evidence showing that the proposed project can be considered exempt from CEQA and is not subject to any of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines. As demonstrated in the analysis below, the proposed project qualifies for exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32.

In-Fill Development Project Exemption
Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15300 through 15333, includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are, therefore, exempt from CEQA. Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines provides a categorical exemption for infill development projects that meet the following criteria:
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan polices as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The applicability of the above criteria to the proposed project is described in the following sections.

Criterion 15332(a): General Plan and Zoning Consistency The BP land use designation is intended to allow for small and large office uses, including uses supportive of office uses. The proposed parking structure would support the existing and approved medical office buildings in the project vicinity, by providing 551 new parking stalls, including a range of standard, compact, Clean Air/EV, Clean Air, and ADA-compliant spaces (see Table 1). Development of the new parking garage would result in a net increase of 345 parking stalls on the SRMC, which would accommodate the parking needs of physicians, nurses, visitors, and other SRMC staff working in the on-campus office uses. As such, the proposed project would constitute a use supportive of the existing and approved medical office uses on the SRMC campus. In addition, the proposed parking structure would be consistent with applicable General Plan policies. For instance, consistent with General Plan Policy LU7.1 and pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 19.74.010, construction of the Parking Garage Expansion would require City approval of a Design Review Permit. As part of the Design Review Permit process, the City would review the proposed parking structure to ensure exterior finishes and the architectural design of the parking garage complement the existing five-story parking garage to which the proposed Parking Garage Expansion would connect. As such, the Design Review Permit process would ensure development of the proposed project meets the requirements set forth by General Plan Policy LU7.2, which necessitates that design standards are applied to new development that Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
ensures compatibility between adjacent developments. Based on the above, the proposed Parking Garage Expansion would be consistent with the General Plan.

With respect to zoning consistency, pursuant to Roseville Zoning Ordinance Section 19.74.010, construction of the Parking Garage Expansion would require City approval of a Design Review Permit. As part of the Design Review Permit process, the City would review the proposed parking structure and improvements for consistency with applicable development standards set forth by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance, as well as those established by the City’s Community Design Guidelines and the NERSP. NERSP Plan Policy 2 of the Medical Campus Component establishes design standards with which SRMC development must comply, including minimum setback distances; standards for minimum lot coverage and land coverage; requirements that new landscaping be consistent with existing SRMC landscaping and be composed of drought-tolerant materials; and preparation of a visual impact analysis concurrent with the submittal of development plans. The Design Review Permit process would ensure construction of the Parking Garage Expansion complies with the foregoing requirements. Therefore, development of the parking structure would be consistent with the requirements set forth for the PD457 district by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance.

Based on the above, the proposed project would be consistent with the Roseville General Plan’s BP designation, applicable General Plan polices, the PD457 zoning district, and applicable zoning regulations. Therefore, the project meets the provisions of Criterion 15332(a).

Criterion 15332(b): Project Location, Size, and Context The project site consists of 0.94-acre on the existing 49-acre SRMC campus in the City of Roseville. The site is currently developed and is surrounded by existing development. Thus, the proposed project meets the provisions of Criterion 15332(b).

Criterion 15332(c): Endangered, Rare, or Threatened Species Endangered, rare, or threatened species include those plant and wildlife species that have been formally listed, are proposed as endangered or threatened, or are candidates for such listing under the federal and/or State Endangered Species Act. Both acts afford protection to listed species and those proposed for listing.

A search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was conducted for the U.S.

Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle in which the project site is located (Rocklin) to identify the potential for any endangered, rare, or threatened species to occur on-site.3 The intent of the database review was to identify documented occurrences of endangered, rare, or threatened species in the project vicinity in order to determine their locations relative to the project site and to evaluate whether the site meets the habitat requirements of such species.

The project site is currently developed. As such, the project site does not contain sensitive habitats capable of supporting endangered, rare, or threatened species, and does not meet the habitat requirements for any of the documented endangered, rare, or threatened species known to occur within the project region. Additionally, all documented occurrences of the endangered, rare, or threatened species identified have occurred outside of the immediate project vicinity. Based on the limited habitat provided on-site, the developed nature of the SRMC campus, and the recorded CNDDB locations of endangered, rare, or threatened species occurrences in the project vicinity, endangered, rare, or threatened plant and wildlife species are unlikely to occur on the project site 3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. RareFind. Available at:
https://apps.wildlife.ca.gov/rarefind/view/RareFind.aspx. Accessed July 2022.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
and would not be impacted by the proposed project. Moreover, this section of the exemption criteria focuses narrowly on whether the project site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Thus, the relevant inquiry is not whether any endangered, rare, or threatened species could occur on-site due to the habitat types present, but, more specifically, whether onsite habitats provide value to endangered, rare, or threatened species. As stated above, the project site does not contain any valuable habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species and, thus, the proposed project meets the provisions of Criterion 15332(c).

Criterion 15332(d): Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, and Water Quality The following sections present analysis regarding potential effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality resulting from implementation of the proposed project.

Traffic
Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines provides specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Pursuant to Section 15064.3, analysis of VMT attributable to a project is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts, with other relevant considerations consisting of the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized travel. VMT is the total miles of travel by personal motorized vehicles a project is expected to generate in a day.

VMT measures the full distance of personal motorized vehicle trips, with one end within the project site. Typically, development projects that are farther from other complementary land uses (such as a business park far from housing) and in areas without transit or active transportation infrastructure (bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.) generate more driving than development near complementary land uses with more robust transportation options. Therefore, development projects located in a central business district with high density and diversity of complementary land uses and frequent transit services are expected to internalize trips and generate shorter and fewer vehicle trips than developments located in a suburban area with low density of residential developments and no transit service in the project vicinity.

As discussed above, the project site is located on the existing 49-acre SRMC campus in the City of Roseville. Surrounding existing uses include SRMC buildings (e.g., MOBs 3, 4, and 5) to the north, south, and west; commercial uses (i.e., Holt Orthodontics, Worth Orthodontics, Roseville Dental Group, Serenity Oral Surgery and Implant Center, Rai Care Center, Capital Allergy & Respiratory Disease Center, and Roseville Diagnostic Hearing Center, Inc.) to the east; and multifamily residences (The Phoenician Apartments) to the east. Additionally, single-family residential neighborhoods are located less than a mile to the east and south of the SRMC along Secret Ravine Parkway. Roseville Transit Routes A and B proceed through the SRMC campus, with a bus stop located 0.17-mile west of the Parking Garage Expansion site. The SRMC campus also includes sidewalks along campus roadways and areas that provide short-term and long-term bicycle parking.

The proposed project would be consistent with the site’s BP land use designation and PD PD457 zoning district. Through the Design Review Permit process, the project would be required to demonstrate consistency with applicable development standards set forth by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance, as well as those established by the City’s Community Design Guidelines and the NERSP, including those related to the provision of bicycle parking spaces and pedestrian facilities. As such, development of the proposed project would be consistent with the surrounding existing SRMC campus developments. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 3.10 of the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS), the SRMC is located within an area currently below the Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
regional average of VMT per capita.4 According to Figure 3.11 of the 2020 MTP/SCS, the area in which the project site is located is anticipated by SACOG to remain below the regional average of VMT per capita in 2040.5 Furthermore, the proposed project would help to meet existing and future parking demand on the SRMC campus, thereby reducing the time and distance required for employees and visitors to find parking on-site. Considering that the proposed project would be consistent with the uses anticipated for the project site in the Roseville General Plan and NERSP and would be consistent with existing SRMC uses and complemented by existing residential uses in the project vicinity, the project would not result in a substantial number of new vehicle trips that would cause VMT per capita in the project region to significantly increase above the existing level of VMT in the region.

Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant effect related to VMT.

Noise
Decibels (dB) are logarithmic units that compare the wide range of sound intensities to which the human ear is sensitive. The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the typical range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable and can be approximated by filtering the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighting network. A-weighting of sound levels best reflects the human ear’s reduced sensitivity to low frequencies, and the use of A-weighted sound level, expressed as dBA, has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment.

Several time-averaged scales represent noise environments and consequences of human activities. Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which can be used to compare the noise level of neighborhoods, is the weighted average noise level over time, presented in dB.

Community noise is also commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the overall noise level associated with a given environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq). The Leq is the foundation of the day-night average noise descriptor (Ldn or DNL), and represents a correlation with community response to noise. The Ldn is based on the average noise level over a 24-hour period, with an additional 10 dB weight applied to noise that occurs during nighttime hours (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). The 10 dB nighttime penalty is applied to account for the assumption that people are more sensitive to nighttime noise exposures as compared to daytime noise exposures. Finally, the highest root-mean-square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time is expressed as Lmax.

Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others. Land uses often associated with sensitive receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals, and passive recreational areas. Sensitive noise receptors may also include threatened or endangered noise sensitive biological species, although many jurisdictions have not adopted noise standards for wildlife areas. Noise sensitive land uses are typically given special attention in order to achieve protection from excessive noise. Sensitivity is a function of noise exposure (in terms of both exposure duration and insulation from noise) and the types of activities involved. In the vicinity of the project site, sensitive land uses include the existing multi‐family residential uses located east of the project site (The Phoenician Apartments).
4 Sacramento Area Council of Governments. 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [pg. 56]. November 18, 2019.
5 Sacramento Area Council of Governments. 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. [pg. 57]. November 18, 2019.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Potential noise increases relative to existing ambient noise levels in the project vicinity that could occur during project construction and operation activities are discussed below.

Project Construction
During the construction of the proposed project, heavy equipment would be used for demolition and building construction, which would temporarily increase ambient noise levels when in use.

Noise levels would vary depending on the type of equipment used, how the equipment is operated, and how well the equipment is maintained. In addition, noise exposure at any single point outside the project site would vary depending on the proximity of construction activities to that point. Standard construction equipment, such as backhoes, loaders, and trucks, would be used on-site.

As part of evaluating potential noise level increases that could occur through development of the proposed project at sensitive receptors in the project vicinity, an Environmental Noise Assessment (Noise Assessment) was prepared by Saxelby Acoustics.6 Table 2 shows maximum noise levels associated with typical construction equipment. Based on the table, activities involved in typical construction would generate maximum noise levels up to 90 dB at a distance of 50 feet. As one increases the distance between equipment, or increases separation of areas with simultaneous construction activity, dispersion and distance attenuation reduce the effects of combining separate noise sources. The noise levels from a source decrease at a rate of approximately 6.0 dB per every doubling of distance from the noise source.

Table 2
Construction Equipment Noise
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dBA at 50 Feet
Auger Drill Rig 84
Backhoe 78
Compactor 83
Compressor (Air) 78
Concrete Saw 90
Dozer 82
Dump Truck 76
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Jackhammer 89
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Saxelby Acoustics, 2022.

Although project construction activities would increase ambient noise levels in the project vicinity, pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.24.030, construction activities conducted between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM, Saturday and Sunday, are exempted from the sound level standards set forth in Roseville Municipal Code Section 9.24.100. Nonetheless, pursuant to the Roseville Noise Regulation, construction would occur only during allowable hours and all construction equipment would be fitted with muffling devices and maintained in good working order. Compliance with such provisions would ensure that noise generated by construction activities associated with the proposed project does not result in a significant effect. 6 Saxelby Acoustics. Environmental Noise Assessment: Sutter MOB 7 and Garage Expansion, City of Roseville, California. July 20, 2022.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Project Operation
Noise generated by the proposed project would in large part be associated with vehicle trips to and from the on-site structures as well as operational noise of the structures. Pursuant to the Noise Assessment, the proposed project is not anticipated to generate a substantial increase in off‐site traffic. The SRMC campus is accessed by way of East Roseville Parkway and Secret Ravine Parkway. East Roseville Parkway carries a daily traffic volume of approximately 64,600 vehicles, while Secret Ravine Parkway carries approximately 16,200 vehicles per day. Even if the proposed project were to add 5,000 vehicles per day to either roadway, Saxelby Acoustics determined that the increase in noise levels would only be 0.3 dBA for East Roseville Parkway and 1.2 dBA for Secret Ravine Parkway. Such increases would not be audible. Therefore, noise level increases during project operation associated with off-site vehicle trips would not result in a significant effect.

With respect to operational noise from the proposed on-site parking structure, pursuant to the Roseville General Plan Noise Element, the City maintains hourly noise level limits of 50 dBA Leq/70 dBA Lmax during the daytime (7:00 AM to 10:00 PM) and 45 dBA Leq/65 dBA Lmax during the nighttime (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM). As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, the proposed project is predicted to generate daytime noise levels of 44 dBA Leq and nighttime noise levels of 41 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property boundary. Such noise levels would lead to an increase in ambient noise levels of 0.6 dBA during daytime hours and 0.8 dBA during nighttime hours. As such, the proposed project would comply with the City’s daytime and nighttime noise level standards without any additional noise control measures. Therefore, potential on-site noise level increases generated by the project operation would not result in a significant effect.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project would comply with the Roseville Noise Ordinance during project construction and would comply with the City’s daytime and nighttime noise level standards without any additional noise control measures during project operation. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant effect related to noise.

Air Quality
The project site is located within the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The SVAB is designated nonattainment for the federal particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and the State particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) standards, as well as for both the federal and State ozone standards. The federal Clean Air Act requires areas designated as federal nonattainment to prepare an air quality control plan referred to as the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The SIP contains the strategies and control measures for states to use to attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The SIP is periodically modified to reflect the latest emissions inventories, planning documents, rules, and regulations of air basins as reported by the agencies with jurisdiction over them. In compliance with regulations, the PCAPCD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the NAAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions via regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies.

The current applicable air quality plan for the project area is the Sacramento Regional 2009 NAAQS 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (Ozone Attainment Plan), updated July 24, 2017. The Ozone Attainment Plan demonstrates how existing and new control strategies would provide the necessary future emission reductions to meet the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements, including the federal AAQS.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 7
Daytime Noise Contours
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 8
Nighttime Noise Contours
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
It should be noted that in addition to strengthening the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) also strengthened the secondary 8-hour ozone NAAQS, making the secondary standard identical to the primary standard.

The SVAB remains classified as a severe nonattainment area for ozone with an attainment deadline of 2027. On October 26, 2015, the USEPA released a final implementation rule for the revised NAAQS for ozone to address the requirements for reasonable further progress, modeling and attainment demonstrations, and reasonably available control measures (RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT). On April 30, 2018, the USEPA published designations for areas in attainment/unclassifiable for the 2015 ozone standards. The USEPA identified the portions of Placer County within the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 ozone standards. Due to the designation of the SVAB as nonattainment for the 2015 standards, the PCAPCD will work with other regional air districts to prepare a new ozone SIP for the revised 2015 standards.

General conformity requirements of the regional air quality plan include whether a project would cause or contribute to new violations of any AAQS, increase the frequency or severity of an existing violation of any AAQS, or delay timely attainment of any AAQS. In order to evaluate ozone and other criteria air pollutant emissions and support attainment goals for those pollutants that the area is designated nonattainment, the PCAPCD has adopted recommended thresholds of significance for emissions of PM10 and the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX). On October 13, 2016, the PCAPCD adopted updated significance thresholds for the aforementioned pollutants.

If the proposed project’s emissions would exceed the pollutant thresholds established by the PCAPCD, the project could have a significant effect on air quality, the attainment of federal and State AAQS, and could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

Because the proposed project would only involve minimal consumption of electricity and would not generate new vehicle trips during project operation, only the anticipated emissions associated with construction of the proposed project have been modeled. The proposed project’s construction emissions were quantified using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) software version 2020.4.0 - a Statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify air quality emissions, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, from land use projects. The model applies inherent default values for various land uses, including construction data, vehicle mix, trip length, average speed, etc. Where project-specific information is available, such information is applied in the model. Pursuant to the CalEEMod results, emissions generated during the proposed project’s construction activities would not exceed the pollutant thresholds established by the PCAPCD. Therefore, project construction would not result in a significant air quality impact.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors. Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on Earth. An individual project’s GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered cumulative impacts.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Implementation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to increases of GHG emissions. Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) associated with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities (electricity and natural gas), water usage, wastewater generation, and the generation of solid waste. The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source emissions. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents (MTCO2e/yr).

In recognition of the global scale of climate change, California has enacted several pieces of legislation in an attempt to curb GHG emissions. Specifically, Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and, more recently, Senate Bill (SB) 32, have established statewide GHG emissions reduction targets.

Accordingly, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has prepared the Climate Change Scoping Plan for California (Scoping Plan), approved in 2008 and updated in 2014 and 2017, which provides the outline for actions to reduce California’s GHG emissions and achieve the emissions reduction targets required by AB 32 and SB 32. In concert with statewide efforts to reduce GHG emissions, air districts, counties, and local jurisdictions throughout the State have implemented their own policies and plans to achieve emissions reductions in line with the Scoping Plan and emissions reduction targets, including AB 32 and SB 32.

Potential impacts related to GHG emissions are discussed in terms of the PCAPCD’s thresholds of significance as well as the Placer County Sustainability Plan below.

PCAPCD Thresholds
On October 13, 2016, the PCAPCD adopted GHG emissions thresholds for construction and operations in concert with the criteria pollutant threshold update. For project construction, the PCAPCD established a threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr. Should construction of a proposed project emit GHG emissions in excess of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr, the project would be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change. Pursuant to the CalEEMod results, the estimated unmitigated maximum construction-related GHG emissions for the proposed project would be well below the PCAPCD’s bright-line threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr. Therefore, project construction would not be considered to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change.

Conclusion
As discussed above, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in short-term constructionrelated or long-term operational emissions of air quality pollutants that would be considered to have the potential to result in significant effects on the environment.

Water Quality
Project construction activities such as grading, excavation, and trenching for site improvements would result in the disturbance of on-site soils. The exposed soils have the potential to affect water quality in two ways: 1) suspended soil particles and sediments transported through runoff; or 2) sediments transported as dust that eventually reach local water bodies. Spills or leaks from heavy equipment and machinery, staging areas, or building sites also have the potential to enter runoff. Typical pollutants include, but are not limited to, petroleum and heavy metals from equipment and products such as paints, solvents, and cleaning agents, which could contain hazardous constituents. Sediment from erosion of graded or excavated surface materials, leaks or spills from equipment, or inadvertent releases of building products could result in water quality degradation if runoff containing the sediment or contaminants should enter receiving waters in Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
sufficient quantities. Impacts from construction-related activities would generally be short-term and of limited duration.

Water quality degradation is regulated by the federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program, established by the Clean Water Act (CWA), which controls and reduces pollutants to water bodies from point and non-point discharges. In California, the NPDES permitting program is administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) through nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). New development that disturbs one or more acres of land must comply with the NPDES Construction General Permit. Compliance with the Construction General Permit would include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which would incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control sedimentation, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction. In addition, as shown in Figure 9, the Parking Garage Expansion includes erosion sediment control plans, detailing the various short-term BMPs that would be incorporated during construction activities to ensure polluted runoff does not enter the City’s storm drain system. Such BMPs include installation of silt fencing around drain inlets, fiber rolls near slopes, concrete washouts, and gravel bags at drop inlets. As such, with incorporation of the short-term erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plans, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to water quality during project construction.

With respect to potential water quality impacts during project operation, pursuant to Roseville Municipal Code Section 14.20.170, site development construction plans must be accompanied by a stormwater management plan designed in compliance with the standards set forth in the West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual. Prior to the issuance of a building permit and installation of BMPs specified in the project-specific stormwater management plan, the plan would be required to have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwater generated from a project site during operation would be controlled, managed, and treated, including, but not limited to, through the incorporation of Low Impact Development (LID) designs and hydromodification management concepts. In accordance with Roseville Municipal Code Section 14.20.170, a stormwater management plan would be required to be prepared for the Parking Garage Expansion and would be subject to City approval prior to issuance of building permits to ensure the plans have been designed in accordance with applicable City standards. Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to water quality during project operation.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality during construction or operation. Thus, the project would meet the provisions of Criterion 15332(d).

Criterion 15332(e): Utilities and Public Services
Due to the nature of the proposed project, the Parking Garage Expansion would not require water or sewer service. Considering the project site’s location within the existing 49-acre SRMC in the City of Roseville, existing utilities are located in the immediate area of the Parking Garage Expansion site. As such, the relocation or construction of new or expanded off-site water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, or other utility infrastructure would not be required.

In addition, given that the proposed project is consistent with the site’s General Plan land use designation, increases in demand on existing utilities and public services such as fire, police, and schools, associated with the project have been previously anticipated in the General Plan and accounted for in local planning efforts. Thus, the site would be adequately served by all required utilities and public services and the proposed project would meet the provisions of Criterion 15332(e).

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Figure 9
Parking Garage Expansion Erosion Control Plan
Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions analysis
Even if a project is ordinarily exempt under any of the potential categorical exemptions, CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides specific instances where exceptions to otherwise applicable exemptions apply. Exceptions to a categorical exemption apply in the following circumstances:
(a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.
(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
(d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.
(f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

The following analysis addresses whether any of the exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply to the proposed project.

Criterion 15300.2(a): Location
CEQA exemption classes 3, 4, 5, 6, or 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. Given that the proposed project qualifies for exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(a) does not apply to the proposed project.

Criterion 15300.2(b): Cumulative Impact
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(b), in applying this exception, the cumulative impact must result from “successive projects of the same type in the same place.” Both the “same type” and “same place” limitations restrict the scope of this exception.7 The project site is located within the existing 49-acre SRMC campus in the City of Roseville, which is developed.

Because the proposed project is consistent with the project site’s General Plan land use designation, cumulative impacts associated with buildout of the project site have been previously anticipated by the City and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. As discussed above, the project would not require off-site utility upsizing or other related improvements with the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts. The project does not include any unique features that would result in new or more severe cumulative impacts beyond what have been analyzed and identified in the General Plan EIR.
7 Stephen L. Kostka and Michael H. Zischke. Practice Under the California Environmental Quality Act, Second Edition [pg. 5-68]. March 2019 Update.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Additionally, similar to the proposed project, MOB 7 is consistent with the BP land use designation and the PD PD457. The BP land use designation is intended to allow for small and large office uses, including uses supportive of office uses. According to the General Plan’s Land Use Element, the BP land use designation primary uses include administrative, professional, government, and medical offices, and research and development (not including any manufacturing or assembly).

The General Plan does not address the compatibility of medical-related research (educational or instructional) uses, such as the proposed Graduate Medical Education program, in the BP land use category. The General Plan, therefore, relies on the PD 457 district to determine the appropriate location and design of medical-related research (educational or instructional) uses through the City’s Conditional Use Permit process. As discussed below, the proposed MOB 7 is consistent with PD 457; therefore, the proposed MOB 7 is consistent with the General Plan.

Roseville Zoning Ordinance Section 19.26.030 establishes off-street parking requirements for Specialized Education and Training uses. The parking requirement for vocational and specialty schools is one space per 50 square feet of instructional area and one space per 250 square feet of office space. MOB 7 includes a Graduate Medical Education program on the ground floor, which required City approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Although the final floor plan for the Graduate Medical Education program has yet to be finalized, the program would occupy only the first floor of MOB 7. The NERSP Guidelines for Medical Campuses allows for parking standards to be modified by the Planning Commission, if justified through a parking study. A Parking Study was prepared for MOB 7 by Fehr and Peers,
8 which compared parking demand trends from
previous years with current on-campus parking demand. Due to a recent shift in tele-medicine appointments, the Parking Study found a decrease in on-campus parking demand. Additionally, the study also noted that a comparison between 2016 and 2021 data showed a decrease in parking demand, as the November 2016 parking demand rate was based on “occupied” square footage, while the 2021 rate was based on gross square footage of the campus. It should be noted that the Roseville Zoning Ordinance does not account for the fact that the MOB 7 would be located on-campus and would, therefore, not be considered a standalone project. Due to the oncampus location of MOB 7, physicians, nurses, and other SRMC staff would likely park once and walk between buildings during the course of the workday. For instance, doctors would walk between MOB 7 and the hospital to see patients. As such, the Parking Study found a parking ratio that is adequate for the campus. The study identified a medical office parking ratio of 3.31 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross building area, which encompasses the Graduate Medical Education program square footage and the new MOB 7. Because the Parking Garage Expansion would provide sufficient parking stalls for users of MOB 7, including the Graduate Medical Education program, the medical program would be consistent with applicable standards and requirements of the set forth by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance.

In addition, consistent with General Plan Policy LU7.1 and pursuant to Roseville Zoning Ordinance Section 19.74.010, construction of MOB 7 required City approval of a Design Review Permit. As part of the Design Review Permit process, the City reviewed the MOB 7 structures and improvements for consistency with applicable development standards set forth by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance, as well as those established by the City’s Community Design Guidelines and the NERSP. The Design Review Permit process ensured construction of MOB 7 complies with the foregoing requirements. Therefore, development of MOB 7 will be consistent with the requirements set forth for the PD457 district by the Roseville Zoning Ordinance.

Therefore, an exception to the exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(b) does not apply to the proposed project.
8 Fehr and Peers. Parking Study for Sutter Roseville Medical Center (SRMC). January 31, 2022.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Criterion 15300.2(c): Significant Effect
In listing a class of projects as exempt, the Secretary has determined that the environmental changes typically associated with projects in that class are not significant effects within the meaning of CEQA, even though an argument might be made that they are potentially significant.

The plain language of CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, subdivision (c), requires that a potentially significant effect must be “due to unusual circumstances” for the exception to apply.

The determination as to whether there are “unusual circumstances” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 subdivision [c]) is reviewed pursuant to PRC Section 21168.5’s substantial evidence prong. Whether a particular project presents circumstances that are unusual for projects in an exempt class is an essentially factual inquiry. As to this question, the lead agency serves as “the finder of fact”.

As the courts have noted, local conditions are relevant in determining whether the environmental effects of a proposed project are unusual or typical. In general, the project site does not contain any unique or unusual features with the potential to result in a potentially significant effect. For example, the project site does not include any aquatic features and, as discussed further below, is not included on any lists of hazardous waste sites. Moreover, the proposed project is consistent with the type and amount of development anticipated as part of the SRMC. Thus, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(c) does not apply to the proposed project.

Criterion 15300.2(d): Scenic Highway
According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, the project site is not located within the vicinity of an officially designated State scenic highway.9 The nearest officially designated State scenic highway is the portion of U.S. Route 50 (US-50) beginning west of Placerville and is not visible from the project site. Thus, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(d) does not apply to the proposed project.

Criterion 15300.2(e): Hazardous Waste Sites
The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a list of data resources that provide information regarding the facilities or sites identified as meeting the “Cortese List” requirements, pursuant to Government Code 65962.5. Pursuant to the SWRCB GeoTracker, which identifies sites that require cleanup, such as Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites, Department of Defense sites, and Cleanup Program sites, hazardous waste sites are not identified on or adjacent to the project site.10 In addition, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database does not identify such sites on or adjacent to the project site.11 Therefore, the project site is not located on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Thus, an exception to the exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e) does not apply to the proposed project.

It should be noted that hazardous materials are routinely used on the SRMC campus as part of operation of the medical campus; however, such materials are used in conformance with applicable regulations. As such, the SRMC campus does not constitute a hazardous waste site. 9 California Department of Transportation. California State Scenic Highway System Map. Available at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa.

Accessed July 2022. 10 State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/.

Accessed July 2022.
11 Department of Toxic Substances Control. EnviroStor. Available at: https://dtsc.ca.gov/dtscs-cortese-list/. Accessed July 2022.

Sutter Roseville Parking Garage Expansion Project
Categorical Exemption Memorandum

July 2022
Criterion 15300.2(f): Historical Resources
The project site consists of impervious surfaces. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and an exception to the exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(f) does not apply to the proposed project.

D. CONCLUSION
This Memorandum demonstrates that the proposed project, even when considered in the cumulative context of MOB 7, can be considered exempt from CEQA under Section 15332, and does not meet any of the exceptions to categorical exemptions set forth in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Appendix A
Noise Assessment
Environmental Noise Assessment
Sutter MOB 7 and Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, California
July 20, 2022
Project #220703
Prepared for:

Raney Planning & Management
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95834
Prepared by:

Saxelby Acoustics LLC
Luke Saxelby, INCE Bd. Cert.

Principal Consultant
Board Certified, Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE) Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022
Page i
www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................ 3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .............................................................................................................. 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE........................................................................................................ 3 EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS ..................................................... 8 EXISTING NOISE RECEPTORS ........................................................................................................................ 8 EXISTING GENERAL AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS ................................................................................................... 8 FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE ENVIRONMENT AT OFF‐SITE RECEPTORS ..................................................... 9 EVALUATION OF PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE AT RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS .................................. 9 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................... 13 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 14 REGULATORY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................. 15 FEDERAL ................................................................................................................................................15 STATE....................................................................................................................................................15 LOCAL....................................................................................................................................................15 CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE VIBRATION........................................................................................................ 16 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES.......................................................................................... 17 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE .................................................................................................................. 17 NOISE LEVEL INCREASE CRITERIA FOR LONG‐TERM PROJECT‐RELATED NOISE LEVEL INCREASES ............................17 PROJECT‐SPECIFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................................................................. 18 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................... 21 Appendices
Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology
Appendix B: Field Noise Measurement Data

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022
Page ii
www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx List of Figures
Figure 1: Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Noise Measurement Sites and Receptor Locations....................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Daytime Project Noise Contours (Leq) .......................................................................................... 11 Figure 4: Nighttime Project Noise Contours (Leq)........................................................................................ 12 List of Tables
Table 1: Typical Noise Levels......................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Summary of Existing Background Noise Measurement Data ......................................................... 8 Table 3: Construction Equipment Noise ..................................................................................................... 13 Table 4: Vibration Levels for Various Construction Equipment.................................................................. 14 Table 5: Effects of Vibration on People and Buildings................................................................................ 16 Table 6: Significance of Changes in Noise Exposure ................................................................................... 18

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

INTRODUCTION
The Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage project includesthe construction of a medical office building divided into two phases and the expansion to the 12 Medical Plaza Drive parking garage structure. Phase 1 will consist of an 85,000 square‐foot four‐story building with a drop‐off area and 32 adjacent parking spaces.

It will displace an existing surface lot with 99 parking spaces and a 6,700 square‐foot modular building.

Phase 2 will include a 15,000 square‐foot two‐story building attached to the Phase 1 MOB 10 building and removal of 24 adjacent parking spaces. The expansion of the 12 Medical Plaza Drive garage will construct a six‐story parking structure attached to the existing five‐story parking garage. The expansion will include 556 new parking stalls and will displace an existing surface lot with 93 spaces. The project is located at the corner of the intersection of Secret Ravine Parkway and Medical Plaza Drive in the City of Roseville, California.

Figure 1 shows the project site plan. Figure 2 shows an aerial photo of the project site.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE
Fundamentals of Acoustics
Acoustics is the science of sound. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to human (or animal) ears. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), then they can be heard and are called sound. The number of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound, and is expressed as cycles per second or Hertz (Hz).

Noise is a subjective reaction to different types of sounds. Noise is typically defined as (airborne) sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected or undesired, and may therefore be classified as a more specific group of sounds. Perceptions of sound and noise are highly subjective from person to person.

Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers.

To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing threshold (20 micropascals), as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to this reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibel scale allows a million‐fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB, and changesin levels(dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by A‐weighted sound levels. There is a strong correlation between A‐weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and the way the human ear perceives sound. For this reason, the A‐weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, California
Figure 1
Project Site Plan
Project Location
Sutter MOB 7 & Parking
Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, California
Figure 2
Noise Measurement Sites
Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx The decibel scale is logarithmic, not linear. In other words, two sound levels 10‐dB apart differ in acoustic energy by a factor of 10. When the standard logarithmic decibel is A‐weighted, an increase of 10‐dBA is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness. For example, a 70‐dBA sound is half as loud as an 80‐dBA sound, and twice as loud as a 60 dBA sound.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the all‐ encompassing noise level associated with a given environment. A common statistical tool is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq), which corresponds to a steady‐state A weighted sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the composite noise descriptor, Ldn, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

The day/night average level (DNL or Ldn) is based upon the average noise level over a 24‐hour day, with a +10‐decibel weighing applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures asthough they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because Ldn represents a 24‐hour average, it tends to disguise short‐term variations in the noise environment.

Table 1 listsseveral examples of the noise levels associated with common situations. Appendix A provides a summary of acoustical terms used in this report.

TABLE 1: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities ‐‐110‐‐  Rock Band
Jet Fly‐over at 300 m (1,000 ft.)  ‐‐100‐‐
Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 ft.)  ‐‐90‐‐
Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 ft.),
at 80 km/hr. (50 mph) ‐‐80‐‐  Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft.) Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 ft.)
Noisy Urban Area, Daytime
Gas Lawn Mower, 30 m (100 ft.) ‐‐70‐‐  Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 ft.) Commercial Area
Heavy Traffic at 90 m (300 ft.) ‐‐60‐‐  Normal Speech at 1 m (3 ft.) Quiet Urban Daytime  ‐‐50‐‐  Large Business Office
Dishwasher in Next Room
Quiet Urban Nighttime  ‐‐40‐‐  Theater, Large Conference Room (Background) Quiet Suburban Nighttime  ‐‐30‐‐  Library
Quiet Rural Nighttime  ‐‐20‐‐  Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (Background) ‐‐10‐‐  Broadcast/Recording Studio
Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing  ‐‐0‐‐  Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. September, 2013.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx Effects of Noise on People
The effects of noise on people can be placed in three categories:
 Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, and dissatisfaction  Interference with activities such as speech, sleep, and learning  Physiological effects such as hearing loss or sudden startling Environmental noise typically produces effects in the first two categories. Workers in industrial plants can experience noise in the last category. There is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. A wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance exists and different tolerances to noise tend to develop based on an individual’s past experiences with noise.

Thus, an important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment isthe way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted: the so‐called ambient noise level. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by those hearing it.

With regard to increases in A‐weighted noise level, the following relationships occur:
 Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1‐dBA cannot be perceived;  Outside of the laboratory, a 3‐dBA change is considered a just‐perceivable difference;  A change in level of at least 5‐dBA is required before any noticeable change in human response would be expected; and
 A 10‐dBA change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and can cause an adverse response.

Stationary point sources of noise – including stationary mobile sources such as idling vehicles – attenuate (lessen) at a rate of approximately 6‐dB per doubling of distance from the source, depending on environmental conditions (i.e. atmospheric conditions and either vegetative or manufactured noise barriers, etc.). Widely distributed noises, such as a large industrial facility spread over many acres, or a street with moving vehicles, would typically attenuate at a lower rate.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE AND VIBRATION ENVIRONMENTS

EXISTING NOISE RECEPTORS
Some land uses are considered more sensitive to noise than others. Land uses often associated with sensitive receptors generally include residences, schools, libraries, hospitals, and passive recreational areas. Sensitive noise receptors may also include threatened or endangered noise sensitive biological species, although many jurisdictions have not adopted noise standards for wildlife areas. Noise sensitive land uses are typically given special attention in order to achieve protection from excessive noise.

Sensitivity is a function of noise exposure (in terms of both exposure duration and insulation from noise) and the types of activities involved. In the vicinity of the project site, sensitive land uses include existing multi‐family residential uses located east of the project site.

EXISTING GENERAL AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
Saxelby Acoustics conducted a continuous noise measurement survey to quantify the existing ambient noise environment at the project site. The noise measurement location is shown on Figure 2. A summary of the noise level measurement survey results is provided in Table 2. Appendix B contains the complete results of the noise monitoring.

The sound level meter was programmed to record the maximum, median, and average noise levels at the project site during the survey. The maximum value, denoted Lmax, represents the highest noise level measured. The average value, denoted Leq, represents the energy average of all of the noise received by the sound level meter microphone during the monitoring period. The median value, denoted L50, represents the sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time during the monitoring period.

A Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) Model 820 precision integrating sound level meter was used for the ambient noise level measurement survey. The meter was calibrated before and after use with a CAL 200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF EXISTING BACKGROUND NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA Location Date Ldn
Daytime Leq
Low‐High
(Average)
Day L50
Low‐High
(Average)
Day Lmax
Low‐High
(Average)
Night Leq
Low‐High
(Average)
Night L50
Low‐High
(Average)
Night Lmax
Low‐High
(Average)
LT‐1 7/15/2022
(Friday) 58 50‐68(58)
50‐53
(51)
60‐89
(69)
46‐52
(49)
45‐51
(48)
57‐69
(63)
LT‐1 7/16/2022
(Saturday) 55 49‐54(52)
48‐53
(51)
59‐85
(68)
45‐50
(48)
45‐50
(47)
51‐67
(60)
LT‐1 7/17/2022
(Sunday) 61 49‐54(52)
47‐53
(51)
58‐82
(66)
46‐62
(55)
46‐49
(47)
58‐86
(69)
Notes:
 All values shown in dBA
 Daytime hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
 Nighttime Hours: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
 Source: Saxelby Acoustics 2022
Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx FUTURE TRAFFIC NOISE ENVIRONMENT AT OFF‐SITE RECEPTORS
Off‐Site Traffic Noise Impact Assessment Methodology
The proposed project is not predicted to generate substantial increase in off‐site traffic.  The medical campus is accessed via E. Roseville Parkway and Secret Ravine Parkway.   E. Roseville Parkway carries a daily traffic volume of approximately 64,600 vehicles while Secret Ravine carries approximately 16,200 vehicles per day.  Even if the project added 5,000 vehicles per day to either roadway the increase in noise levels would only be 0.3 dBA for E. Roseville Parkway and 1.2 dBA for Secret Ravine.  These increases would not be audible.  Therefore, off‐site traffic noise increases are not considered further in this analysis.

EVALUATION OF PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE AT RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS Project site traffic circulation and HVAC operational noise are considered to be the primary noise sources for this project. The following is a list of assumptions used for the noise modeling. The data used is based upon a combination of manufacturer’s provided data and Saxelby Acoustics data from similar operations.

Parking Structures: Approximately 556 trips per hour are assumed for parking structure traffic.

Parking structure movement for cars is predicted to generate a sound exposure level (SEL) of 71 dBA SEL at 50 feet. It was assumed that nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) parking garage utilization would be 25% of the peak hour volume. Saxelby Acoustics data.

Rooftop HVAC Units: Three Trane SXHLF75 75‐ton packaged rooftop units operating continuously during the daytime and 50% of the time at night. The HVAC unit is expected to generate a sound exposure level of 62 dBA Leq at 50 feet.  Manufacturer’s data.

Rooftop Heat Pump Unit: 11 Mini‐split heat pump condensers operating continuously during the daytime, and 50% of the time at night. Mini‐split heat pump condensers are predicted to generate a maximum sound exposure level of 50 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Manufacturer’s data.

Rooftop Exhaust Fan Unit: One exhaust fan operating continuously during the daytime, and 50% of the time at night. Exhaust fan is precited to generate a continuous noise level of 50 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Saxelby Acoustics data.

Rooftop Boiler Unit: Boiler Unit operating continuously during the daytime, and 50% of the time at night. Boiler unit is assumed to generate a continuous noise level of 62 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Saxelby Acoustics data.

It should be noted that the noise‐generating uses associated with the proposed project are not predicted to generate maximum noise levels more than 20 dBA above the average (Leq) noise levels. The City of Roseville maximum noise level standards for both daytime and nighttime hours are 20 dBA above the average noise level standards. Therefore, where the average project‐generated noise levels comply with the City’s standards, project‐generated maximum noise levels will also comply.

Saxelby Acoustics used the SoundPLAN noise prediction model. Inputsto the model included sound power levels for the proposed amenities, existing and proposed buildings, terrain type, and locations of sensitive receptors.  These predictions are made in accordance with International Organization for Standardization Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx (ISO) standard 9613‐2:1996 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors).  ISO 9613 is the most commonly used method for calculating exterior noise propagation. Figure 3 shows the noise level contours resulting from operation of the project during daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) operation.

Figure 4 shows the noise level contours during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) operation.

Existing: 52 dBA
Project: 44 dBA
Ex+P: 52.6 dBA
Increase: +0.6 dBA
Sutter MOB 7 and Parking
Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, California
Figure 3
Project Noise Contours (dBA Leq)
Daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.)
Sutter MOB 7 and Parking
Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, California
Figure 4
Project Noise Contours (dBA Leq)
Nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.)
Existing: 48 dBA
Project: 41 dBA
Ex+P: 48.8 dBA
Increase: +0.8 dBA
Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT
During the construction of the proposed project noise from construction activities would temporarily add to the noise environment in the project vicinity. As shown in Table 3, activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dB at a distance of 50 feet.

TABLE 3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dBA at 50 feet
Auger Drill Rig 84
Backhoe 78
Compactor 83
Compressor (air) 78
Concrete Saw 90
Dozer 82
Dump Truck 76
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Jackhammer 89
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA‐HEP‐05‐054. January 2006.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT
The primary vibration‐generating activities associated with the proposed project would occur during construction when activitiessuch as grading, utilities placement, and parking lot construction occur. Table 4 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment.

TABLE 4: VIBRATION LEVELS FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Type of Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity at
25 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
50 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
100 feet
(inches/second)
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.031 0.011
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.027 0.010
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.031 0.011
Jackhammer 0.035 0.012 0.004
Vibratory Hammer 0.070 0.025 0.009
Vibratory Compactor/roller 0.210
(Less than 0.20 at 26 feet) 0.074 0.026
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines. Federal Transit Administration. May 2006.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

REGULATORY CONTEXT

FEDERAL
There are no federal regulations related to noise that apply to the Proposed Project.

STATE
California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Appendix G, indicate that a significant noise impact may occur if a project exposes persons to noise or vibration levels in excess of local general plans or noise ordinance standards, or cause a substantial permanent or temporary increase in ambient noise levels. CEQA standards are discussed more below under the Thresholds of Significance section.

LOCAL
City of Roseville General Plan
The City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element Table 1X‐3 (Table 5) establishes an acceptable exterior noise levels for stationary noise sources.

TABLE 5: CITY OF ROSEVILLE STATIONARY NOISE LEVEL STANDARDS Noise Level Descriptor Daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) Nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Hourly Leq, dB 50 45
Maximum Level, dB 70 65
For municipal power plants consisting primarily of broadband, stead state noise sources, the hourly (Leq) noise standards may be increased up to 10 dB(A), but no exceed 55 dB(A) Hourly Leq, dB.

Each of the noise levels specified above should be lowered by five dB for simple tone noises, noises consisting primarily of speech or music, or for recuring impulsive noises. Such noises are generally considered by residents to be particularly annoying and are a primary source of noise complaints. These noise level standards do not apply to resident units established in conjunction with industrial or commercial uses.

No standards have been included for interior noise levels. Standard construction practices should, with exterior noise levels identified, result in acceptable interior noise levels.

Source: City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element 2035.

Based upon review of the City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element standards, hourly noise level limits of 50 dBA Leq / 70 dBA Lmax during the daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 45 dBA Leq / 65 dBA Lmax during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7 a.m.).

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE VIBRATION
Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception to the vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration can be measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration measures in terms of peak particle velocities in inches per second. Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of peak particle velocities.

Human and structural response to different vibration levelsisinfluenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. Table 5, which was developed by Caltrans, shows the vibration levels which would normally be required to result in damage to structures. The vibration levels are presented in terms of peak particle velocity in inches per second.

TABLE 6: EFFECTS OF VIBRATION ON PEOPLE AND BUILDINGS
Peak Particle Velocity Human Reaction Effect on Buildings mm/second in/second

0.15‐0.30 0.006‐0.019 Threshold of perception; possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of
any type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected

2.5 0.10 Level at which continuous vibrations
begin to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings (this agrees with the levels
established for people standing on
bridges and subjected to relative
short periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling ‐ houses with plastered walls
and ceilings. Special types of finish such
as lining of walls, flexible ceiling
treatment, etc., would minimize
“architectural” damage
10‐15 0.4‐0.6
Vibrations considered unpleasant by
people subjected to continuous
vibrations and unacceptable to some
people walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” dam age
and possibly minor structural damage
Source: Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. Caltrans. TAV‐02‐01‐R9601. February 20, 2002.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project would normally be considered to result in significant noise impacts if noise levels conflict with adopted environmental standards or plans or if noise generated by the project would substantially increase existing noise levels at sensitive receivers on a permanent or temporary basis. Significance criteria for noise impacts are drawn from CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Items XI [a‐f]).

Would the project:
a.   Generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b.   Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c.   For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NOISE LEVEL INCREASE CRITERIA FOR LONG‐TERM PROJECT‐RELATED NOISE LEVEL INCREASES The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines define a significant impact of a project if it “increases substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas.” Generally, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it will substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or expose people to severe noise levels. In practice, more specific professional standards have been developed. These standards state that a noise impact may be considered significant if it would generate noise that would conflict with local project criteria or ordinances, or substantially increase noise levels at noise sensitive land uses. The potential increase in traffic noise from the project is a factor in determining significance. Research into the human perception of changes in sound level indicates the following:
 A 3‐dB change is barely perceptible,
 A 5‐dB change is clearly perceptible, and
 A 10‐dB change is perceived as being twice or half as loud.

A limitation of using a single noise level increase value to evaluate noise impacts is that it fails to account for pre‐project‐noise conditions. Table 7 is based upon recommendations made by the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) to provide guidance in the assessment of changes in ambient noise levels resulting from aircraft operations. The recommendations are based upon studies that relate aircraft noise levels to the percentage of persons highly annoyed by the noise. Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, it has been accepted that they are applicable to all sources of noise described in terms of cumulative noise exposure metrics such as the Ldn.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx TABLE 7: SIGNIFICANCE OF CHANGES IN NOISE EXPOSURE
Ambient Noise Level Without Project, Ldn Increase Required for Significant Impact <60 dB +5.0 dB or more
60‐65 dB +3.0 dB or more
>65 dB +1.5 dB or more
Source: Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON)
Based on the Table 7 data, an increase in the traffic noise level of 5 dB or more would be significant where the pre‐project noise levels are less than 60 dB Ldn, or 3 dB or more where existing noise levels are between 60 to 65 dB Ldn. Extending this concept to higher noise levels, an increase in the traffic noise level of 1.5 dB or more may be significant where the pre‐project traffic noise level exceeds 65 dB Ldn. The rationale for the Table 7 criteria is that, as ambient noise levels increase, a smaller increase in noise resulting from a project is sufficient to cause annoyance.

PROJECT‐SPECIFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact 1: Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Operational Noise at Sensitive Receptors
The City of Roseville General Plan Noise Elementstandards, hourly noise level limits of 50 dBA Leq / 70 dBA Lmax during the daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 45 dBA Leq / 65 dBA Lmax during the nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7 a.m.).

As shown on Figures 3 and 4, the proposed project is predicted to generate daytime noise levels of 44 dBA Leq and nighttime noise levels of 41 dBA Leq at the nearest residential property boundary. This will lead to an increase in ambient noise levels of +0.6 dBA during daytime hours and +0.8 dBA during nighttime hours.

The proposed medical office building and parking garage expansion comply with the City’s daytime and nighttime noise level standards without any additional noise control measures. Therefore, impacts resulting from operation of mechanical equipment and parking garage circulation noise would be considered less‐than‐significant.

Construction Noise
During the construction phases of the project, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the immediate project vicinity. As indicated in Table 3Error! Reference source not found., activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet.  Construction activities would also be temporary in nature and are anticipated to occur during normal daytime working hours.

The City of Roseville Municipal Code limits hours of construction activities when construction is located 500 feet or closer to a residential zone. Construction islimited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx p.m. Monday through Friday and between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. The nearest residential uses are located approximately 150 feet to the north, as measured from the center of construction area.  At this distance, maximum construction noise levels would be in the range of 62‐76 dBA Lmax at the nearest residential uses.  Existing daytime ambient noise levels at the property line of the nearest residential uses was found to be in the range of 59‐89 dBA Lmax.

Noise would also be generated during the construction phase by increased truck traffic on area roadways.

A project‐generated noise source would be truck traffic associated with transport of heavy materials and equipment to and from the construction site. This noise increase would be of short duration and would occur during daytime hours.

Although construction activities are temporary in nature and would occur during normal daytime working hours, construction‐related noise could result in sleep interference at existing noise‐sensitive land uses in the vicinity of the construction if construction activities were to occur outside the normal daytime hours.

Therefore, impacts resulting from noise levels temporarily exceeding the threshold of significance due to construction would be considered potentially significant.

Mitigation Measure
1(a) The City shall establish the following as conditions of approval for any permit that results in the use of construction equipment:
 Construction activities(excluding activitiesthat would result in a safety concern to the public or construction workers) shall be limited to between the daytime hours of 7 AM and 7 PM daily.
 Construction equipment shall be properly maintained and equipped with noise‐reduction intake and exhaust mufflers and engine shrouds, in accordance with manufacturers’ recommendations. Equipment engine shrouds shall be closed during equipment operation.  When not in use, motorized construction equipment shall not be left idling for more than 5 minutes.
 Stationary equipment (power generators, compressors, etc.) shall be located at the furthest practical distance from nearby noise‐sensitive land uses or sufficiently shielded to reduce noise‐related impacts.

Implementation of mitigation measures 1(a) would help to reduce construction‐generated noise levels.

With mitigation, this impact would be considered less‐than‐significant.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx Impact 2: Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building structural damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of perception.

Building damage can take the form of cosmetic or structural.

The Table 5 data indicate that construction vibration levels anticipated for the project are less than the

0.2 in/sec threshold at distances of 26 feet. Sensitive receptors which could be impacted by construction related vibrations, especially vibratory compactors/rollers, are located further than 26 feet from typical construction activities. At these distances construction vibrations are not predicted to exceed acceptable levels. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours.

This is a less‐than‐significant impact and no mitigation is required.

Impact 3: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
There are no projects within 2 miles of the project site. Therefore, this impact is not applicable to the proposed project.

Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion
City of Roseville, CA
July 20, 2022

www.SaxNoise.com
Job #220703
C:\Users\lsaxe\Dropbox\Saxelby Acoustics\Job Folders\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion\Word\220703 Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion.docx

REFERENCES
American National Standards Institute. (1998). [Standard] ANSI S1.43‐1997 (R2007): Specifications for integrating‐averaging sound level meters. New York: Acoustical Society of America.

American Standard Testing Methods, Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A‐Weighted Sound Levels, American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM) E1014‐08, 2008.

ASTM E1014‐12. Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A‐Weighted Sound Levels. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.

ASTM E1780‐12. Standard Guide for Measuring Outdoor Sound Received from a Nearby Fixed Source. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.

Barry, T M. (1978). FHWA highway traffic noise prediction model (FHWA‐RD‐77‐108). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of transportation, Federal highway administration, Office of research, Office of environmental policy.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.

Egan, M. D. (1988). Architectural acoustics. United States of America: McGraw‐Hill Book Company.

Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. FHWA‐HEP‐ 05‐054 DOT‐VNTSC‐FHWA‐05‐01. January 2006.

Hanson, Carl E. (Carl Elmer). (2006). Transit noise and vibration impact assessment. Washington, DC:

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning and Environment.

International Electrotechnical Commission. Technical committee 29:  Electroacoustics. International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2013). Electroacoustics: Sound level meters.

International Organization for Standardization. (1996). Acoustic ‐ ISO 9613‐2: Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. Part 2: General methods of calculation. Ginevra: I.S.O.

Miller, L. N., Bolt, Beranek, & and Newman, Inc. (1981). Noise control for buildings and manufacturing plants. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.

SoundPLAN.  SoundPLAN GmbH. Backnang, Germany.  http://www.soundplan.eu/english/ Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology
Acoustics   The science of sound.

Ambient Noise  The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre‐project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

ASTC  Apparent  Sound  Transmission  Class.    Similar  to  STC  but  includes  sound  from  flanking  paths  and  correct  for  room reverberation. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Attenuation   The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A‐Weighting   A  frequency‐response  adjustment  of  a  sound  level meter  that  conditions  the  output  signal  to  approximate  human response.

Decibel or dB   Fundamental  unit  of  sound, A Bell is  defined as  the logarithm  of  the  ratio  of  the  sound  pressure  squared  over  the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one‐tenth of a Bell.

CNEL   Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as  the 24‐hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 ‐ 10 p.m.) weighted by +5 dBA and nighttime hours weighted by +10 dBA.

DNL  See definition of Ldn.

IIC  Impact  Insulation  Class.  An  integer‐number  rating  of  how  well  a  building  floor  attenuates  impact  sounds,  such  as footsteps. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Frequency   The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz (Hz).

Ldn     Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq     Equivalent or energy‐averaged sound level.

Lmax     The highest root‐mean‐square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

L(n)   The sound level exceeded a described percentile over a measurement period. For instance, an hourly L50 is the sound level exceeded 50% of the time during the one‐hour period.

Loudness   A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

NIC  Noise Isolation Class.  A rating of the noise reduction between two spaces.  Similar to STC but includes sound  from flanking paths and no correction for room reverberation.

NNIC  Normalized Noise Isolation Class.  Similar to NIC but includes a correction for room reverberation.

Noise     Unwanted sound.

NRC   Noise Reduction Coefficient. NRC is a single‐number rating of the sound‐absorption of a material equal to the arithmetic mean of the sound‐absorption coefficients in the 250, 500, 1000, and 2,000 Hz octave frequency bands rounded to the nearest multiple  of  0.05. It  is  a  representation  of  the  amount of  sound energy  absorbed  upon  striking  a  particular surface. An NRC of 0 indicates perfect reflection; an NRC of 1 indicates perfect absorption.

RT60     The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

Sabin   The unit of sound absorption. One square foot of material absorbing 100% of incident sound has an absorption of 1 Sabin.

SEL   Sound Exposure Level. SEL is a rating, in decibels, of a discrete event, such as an aircraft flyover or train pass by, that compresses the total sound energy into a one‐second event.

SPC  Speech Privacy Class. SPC is a method of rating speech privacy in buildings. It is designed  to measure the degree of speech  privacy  provided  by  a  closed  room,  indicating  the  degree  to  which  conversations  occurring  within  are  kept private from listeners outside the room.

STC   Sound Transmission Class. STC is an integer rating of how well a building partition attenuates airborne sound. It is widely used  to  rate  interior  partitions,  ceilings/floors,  doors,  windows  and  exterior  wall  configurations.    The  STC  rating  is typically used to rate the sound transmission of a specific building element when tested in laboratory conditions where flanking paths around the assembly don’t exist.   A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Threshold  The lowest sound that can be perceived by the human auditory system, generally considered of Hearing   to be 0 dB for persons with perfect hearing.

Threshold   Approximately 120 dB above the threshold of hearing. of Pain
Impulsive   Sound of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.

Simple Tone         Any sound which can be judged as audible as a single pitch or set of single pitches.

Appendix B: Continuous Ambient Noise
Measurement Results
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Friday, July 15, 2022 0:00 49 68 47 45 Coordinates: 38.7658774°, Friday, July 15, 2022 1:00 47 60 46 45
Friday, July 15, 2022 2:00 46 60 45 44
Friday, July 15, 2022 3:00 47 65 46 45
Friday, July 15, 2022 4:00 49 57 48 47
Friday, July 15, 2022 5:00 50 69 50 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 6:00 52 64 51 49
Friday, July 15, 2022 7:00 51 68 51 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 8:00 50 64 50 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 9:00 52 76 50 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 10:00 51 65 50 49
Friday, July 15, 2022 11:00 53 67 50 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 12:00 50 61 50 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 13:00 59 83 51 48
Friday, July 15, 2022 14:00 68 89 52 51
Friday, July 15, 2022 15:00 53 68 52 51
Friday, July 15, 2022 16:00 55 63 53 52
Friday, July 15, 2022 17:00 53 60 53 52
Friday, July 15, 2022 18:00 53 68 53 51
Friday, July 15, 2022 19:00 54 73 52 51
Friday, July 15, 2022 20:00 52 70 51 49
Friday, July 15, 2022 21:00 50 60 50 47
Friday, July 15, 2022 22:00 49 63 48 46
Friday, July 15, 2022 23:00 48 59 47 46
Leq Lmax L50 L90
58 69 51 49
49 63 48 46
50 60 50 47
68 89 53 52
46 57 45 44
52 69 51 49
58 94
58 6
Appendix B1a: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-1
Night Average
CAL200
-121.2447125°
Friday, July 15, 2022 Friday, July 15, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
LT-1
68 60 60
65 57
69 64
68 64
76 65
67 61
83 89
68 63
60 68
73 70
60 63
59 45 45 44 45
47 48 49 48 48 48 49 48 48 48
51 51 52 52 51 51
49 47 46 46
49 47 46 47
49 50 52 51 50
52 51 53
50 59
68 53
55 53 53 54
52 50 49 48
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Saturday, July 16, 2022 0:00 48 67 46 45 Coordinates: 38.7658774°, Saturday, July 16, 2022 1:00 46 59 46 44
Saturday, July 16, 2022 2:00 45 51 45 44
Saturday, July 16, 2022 3:00 45 53 45 43
Saturday, July 16, 2022 4:00 48 58 46 44
Saturday, July 16, 2022 5:00 48 66 47 45
Saturday, July 16, 2022 6:00 48 54 48 46
Saturday, July 16, 2022 7:00 49 74 48 46
Saturday, July 16, 2022 8:00 54 85 48 46
Saturday, July 16, 2022 9:00 49 63 48 46
Saturday, July 16, 2022 10:00 51 66 50 48
Saturday, July 16, 2022 11:00 52 67 51 50
Saturday, July 16, 2022 12:00 51 62 51 50
Saturday, July 16, 2022 13:00 52 60 51 50
Saturday, July 16, 2022 14:00 52 59 52 50
Saturday, July 16, 2022 15:00 53 72 52 51
Saturday, July 16, 2022 16:00 52 59 52 51
Saturday, July 16, 2022 17:00 54 74 52 51
Saturday, July 16, 2022 18:00 54 69 53 52
Saturday, July 16, 2022 19:00 53 71 52 51
Saturday, July 16, 2022 20:00 53 60 52 51
Saturday, July 16, 2022 21:00 53 80 51 49
Saturday, July 16, 2022 22:00 50 65 50 48
Saturday, July 16, 2022 23:00 50 64 49 47
Leq Lmax L50 L90
52 68 51 50
48 60 47 45
49 59 48 46
54 85 53 52
45 51 45 43
50 67 50 48
55 85
CNEL 55 Night % 15
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
Night Average
CAL200
-121.2447125°
Saturday, July 16, 2022 Saturday, July 16, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
Appendix B1b: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-1
67 59
51 53
58 66
54 74
85 63
66 67
62 60 59
72 59
74 69
71 60
80 65 64
45 44 44 43 44 45 46 46 46 46 48
50 50 50 50 51 51 51 52 51 51
49 48 47
48 46 45 45
48 48 48 49
54 49
51 52 51 52 52 53 52 54 54 53 53 53
50 50
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Sunday, July 17, 2022 0:00 56 81 47 46 Coordinates: 38.7658774°, Sunday, July 17, 2022 1:00 52 76 47 45
Sunday, July 17, 2022 2:00 47 63 46 45
Sunday, July 17, 2022 3:00 46 59 46 44
Sunday, July 17, 2022 4:00 62 86 47 45
Sunday, July 17, 2022 5:00 51 73 47 45
Sunday, July 17, 2022 6:00 48 62 47 46
Sunday, July 17, 2022 7:00 49 70 47 46
Sunday, July 17, 2022 8:00 53 82 48 46
Sunday, July 17, 2022 9:00 52 76 49 47
Sunday, July 17, 2022 10:00 50 61 49 47
Sunday, July 17, 2022 11:00 51 68 51 49
Sunday, July 17, 2022 12:00 52 60 52 51
Sunday, July 17, 2022 13:00 52 60 52 51
Sunday, July 17, 2022 14:00 53 62 52 51
Sunday, July 17, 2022 15:00 53 69 53 51
Sunday, July 17, 2022 16:00 53 60 53 51
Sunday, July 17, 2022 17:00 54 59 53 52
Sunday, July 17, 2022 18:00 54 72 53 52
Sunday, July 17, 2022 19:00 54 70 53 52
Sunday, July 17, 2022 20:00 52 70 51 49
Sunday, July 17, 2022 21:00 50 58 49 48
Sunday, July 17, 2022 22:00 49 61 49 47
Sunday, July 17, 2022 23:00 48 58 48 46
Leq Lmax L50 L90
52 66 51 50
55 69 47 46
49 58 47 46
54 82 53 52
46 58 46 44
62 86 49 47
61 50
61 50
Appendix B1c: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Sutter MOB 7 and Parking Garage Expansion Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-1
Night Average
CAL200
-121.2447125°
Sunday, July 17, 2022 Sunday, July 17, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
81 76
63 59
86 73
62 70
82 76
61 68
60 60
62 69
60 59
72 70 70
58 61
58 46 45 45 44 45 45 46 46 46 47 47
49 51 51 51 51 51 52 52 52
49 48 47 46
56 52
47 46
62 51
48 49
53 52
50 51 52 52 53 53 53 54 54 54
52 50 49 48
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice is hereby given that, as Lead Agency, the City of Roseville, Development Services Department, Planning Division has prepared an Initial Study leading to a Negative Declaration for the project referenced below. This Negative Declaration is available for public review and comment.

Project Title/File#: NERSP PCL 25 – Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & Sutter MOB 7; File#PL22-0024 and PL22-0061
Project Location: 12 and 7 Medical Plaza, Roseville, Placer County; 046-060-034-000 Project Owner: Sutter Valley Hospitals; P.O. Box 619051 Roseville, CA 95661 Project Applicant: Tony Amato & Sarah Bergman, Dreyfuss + Blackford Architecture Project Planner: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner – City of Roseville; (916) 774-5247 Project Description:

The project site is not identified on any list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5
Document Review and Availability: The public review and comment period begins on April 12, 2022 and ends on May 2, 2022. The Negative Declaration may be reviewed online at:
https://www.roseville.ca.us/environmentaldocuments under Private Development Projects.

Written comments on the adequacy of the Negative Declaration may be submitted to Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner at [email protected] or in person at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (Monday—Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.), and must be received no later than 5:00 pm on May 2, 2022.

This project will be scheduled for a public hearing before the City’s Planning Commission. At this hearing, the Planning Commission will consider the Negative Declaration and associated project entitlements. The tentative hearing date is May 12, 2022.

Dated: April 11, 2022
Mike Isom
Development Services Director
Publish: April 12, 2022

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title/File Number: NERSP PCL 25 – Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & Sutter MOB 7;File#PL22-0024 and PL22-0061
Project Location: 12 and 7 Medical Plaza, Roseville, Placer County; 046-060-034-000 Project Applicant: Tony Amato & Sarah Bergman, Dreyfuss + Blackford Architecture; (916) 453-1234; 3540 Folsom Boulevard, Sacramento CA 95816 Property Owner: Sutter Valley Hospitals; P.O. Box 619051 Roseville, CA 95661 Lead Agency Contact Person: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner - City of Roseville; (916) 774-5247 Date: April 12, 2022
Project Description:

The project site is within the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan area. The two (2) proposed buildings are located within the existing 49-acre Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus, specifically on the northeastern area of the campus. The campus includes frontage on Secret Ravine Parkway and an entrance along East Roseville Parkway; the campus is predominately surrounded by open space along the south and west portions of the campus. Throughout the years the campus has been developed with a main hospital building, acute care buildings, and outlying medical buildings and parking garages. In 2006, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit which authorized expansion of the campus from the originally approved 804,000 square feet to 1,100,000 square feet. At full buildout, the Sutter Roseville Medical Center would contain a total of 738,500 square feet of licensed acute care spaces, 361,500 square feet of medical office building space for non-acute care and physician’s offices, and a total of 3,864 surface and parking structure spaces (parking space square footage is not included in the 1,100,000 square feet). The two (2) proposed projects are both within the previously analyzed and approved campus square footage. The applicant requests approval of two (2) Design Review Permits for the expansion of an existing five-story parking garage with a six-story parking addition and a new medical office building (MOB). The garage expansion is proposed to be located immediately to the east of the existing five-story parking garage and be connected to the future parking garage at each level; this would allow vehicles and pedestrians to go between the two sides. The new six-story parking addition would use the existing vehicles ramps on the existing parking garage to access each level of the new expansion. The architecture design of the proposed expansion would emulate the existing parking garage design, the same finish materials and color palette are proposed to be used on the proposed expansion. The proposed MOB 7 would be located along the east edge of the campus, north of the existing five-story parking garage and east of the existing MOB 4. The MOB site is surrounded by an existing private dental clinic to the south and an apartment complex to the east. The MOB project site is currently occupied by a temporary modular building and sterilization trailer, which both are proposed to be removed with the construction of MOB 7. The MOB 7 is proposed to be constructed in two-phases, Phase 1 would consists of the four-story building and Phase 2 would consist of a two-story addition on the front of the building. A private outdoor area is proposed along the east side of MOB 7, this private outdoor area would be used by the faculty and students of the new GME program. The overall architectural and site design of the project would emulate the existing campus aesthetics. As part of the MOB 7 construction, Sutter proposes a new Graduate Medical Education (GME) program on the first floor of MOB 7. As such, the applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to permit the new GME program. The project site where the parking garage expansion and the new medical office building are proposed have been previously disturbed for surface parking.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT – PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276
~J
ROsE'VILLE

CALIFORNIA
2 DECLARATION
The Planning Manager has determined that the above project will not have significant effects on the environment and therefore does not require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. The determination is based on the attached initial study and the following findings:

A. The project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species, reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plants or animals or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.

B. The project will not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals.

C. The project will not have impacts, which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.

D. The project will not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

E. No substantial evidence exists that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.

F. This Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency.

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT–PLANNING DIVISION
311 Vernon St, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 774-5276

INITIAL STUDY & ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Project Title/File Number: NERSP PCL 25 – Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & Sutter MOB 7; File#PL22-0024 and PL22-0061
Project Location: 12 and 7 Medical Plaza, Roseville, Placer County; 046-060-034-000 Project Description: The proposed project (Project) evaluated in this Initial Study consist of two (2) Design Review Permits (DRP) and one (1) Conditional Use Permit. The applicant proposes to expand the existing five-story garage located along Medical Plaza (Figure 2). The expansion is proposed directly to the east of the existing five-story parking garage, where currently a surface parking lot for the campus exists. The proposed expansion will consist of six-levels tied into the existing five-level parking garage. The proposed six-story parking garage will resemble the existing parking garage through the use of the same color palette and building materials. The second DRP is for the construction of a 100,000 square foot medical office building constructed in two phases; Phase 1 totaling 85,000 square feet would be constructed immediately after City approval and Phase 2 totaling 15,000 square feet in size would be constructed at a later date. The new MOB proposes a new accessible drop off zone with an overhead canopy, and accessible parking stalls immediately in front of the proposed building. The proposed project is located along the east edge of the campus, northeast of the existing five-story parking garage, north of an existing private dental clinic, and south of an existing apartment complex. The site is currently occupied by a temporary modular building and sterilization trailer, which are both slated to be removed as part of this project. The proposed MOB 7 will house outpatient healthcare clinics and the Graduate Medical Education program, a training program for resident physicians.

Project Applicant: Tony Amato & Sarah Bergman, Dreyfuss + Blackford Architecture; (916) 453-1234; 3540 Folsom Boulevard, Sacramento CA 95816 Property Owner: Sutter Valley Hospitals; P.O. Box 619051 Roseville, CA 95661 Lead Agency Contact: Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner – City of Roseville; (916) 774-5247 This initial study has been prepared to identify and assess the anticipated environmental impacts of the above described project application. The document relies on previous environmental documents (see Attachments) and site-specific studies prepared to address in detail the effects or impacts associated with the project. Where documents were submitted by consultants working for the applicant, City staff reviewed such documents in order to determine whether, based on their own professional judgment and expertise, staff found such documents to be credible and persuasive. Staff has only relied on documents that reflect their independent judgment, and has not accepted at face value representations made by consultants for the applicant. ~, ROsE~lLLE

CALIFORNIA

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

This document has been prepared to satisfy the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15000 et seq.). CEQA requires that all state and local government agencies consider the environmental consequences of projects over which they have discretionary authority before acting on those projects.

The initial study is a public document used by the decision-making lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. If the lead agency finds substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may have a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial, the lead agency is required to prepare an EIR.

If the agency finds no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment, a negative declaration shall be prepared. If in the course of analysis, the agency recognizes that the project may have a significant impact on the environment, but that by incorporating specific mitigation measures to which the applicant agrees, the impact will be reduced to a less than significant effect, a mitigated negative declaration shall be prepared.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Table of Contents
Project Description …………………………………………………………………………………… 4
City of Roseville Mitigation Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards ……………………………. 6 Other Environmental Documents Relied Upon …………………………………………………….. 7 Explanation of Initial Study Checklist ........................................................................................ 8 Initial Study Checklist
I. Aesthetics ……………………………………………. 8
II. Agricultural & Forestry Resources ………………….. 11
III. Air Quality ……………………………………………. 13
IV. Biological Resources ………………………………… 15
V. Cultural Resources ………………………………….. 19
VI. Energy ……………………………………………….. 20
VII. Geology and Soils ………………………………….. 21
VIII. Greenhouse Gases ………………………………….. 24
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ………………….. 26
X. Hydrology and Water Quality ………………………… 28
XI. Land Use and Planning ……………………………… 31
XII. Mineral Resources …………………………………… 32
XIII. Noise …………………………………………………. 32
XIV. Population and Housing ……………………………... 34
XV. Public Services ……………………………………….. 35
XVI. Recreation …………………………………………… 36
XVII. Transportation ……………………………………… 37
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ……………………………. 40
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ………………………… 41
XX. Wildfire ……………………………………………………. 43
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ………………….. 44
Environmental Determination …………………………………………………………………….. 46 Attachments ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project Location
The approximately 49-acre Sutter Roseville Medical Center is located in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan area (NERSP). The Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus located east of Secret Ravine Parkway and north of Roseville Parkway (Figure 1). The two (2) projects are located at 7 and 12 Medical Plaza (APN 046-060-034- 000). The Parking Garage Expansion site is approximately 0.94 acres in size and contains an existing surface parking lot with lighting and landscaping. The Sutter MOB 7 project site is approximately 1.64 acres in size and is developed with surface parking, lighting, and landscaping; a temporary modular building and sterilization trailer are both currently on the site but are proposed to be removed at the time of the construction of MOB 7. Both project have a land use designation of Business Professional (BP) and a zoning designation of Planned Development for Medical Office (PD457).

Figure 1: Project Location
Background
Location Zoning General Plan Land Use Actual Use of Properties Site Planned Development for Medical
Office (PD457) Business Professional (BP)
Surface parking lot and
temporary modular building and
sterilization trailer
Northeast Multi-Family Housing (R3) High Density Residential (HDR) A multi-family apartment complex MOB 7
Parking
Garage
Expansion

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

South PD457 BP Sutter Roseville Medical Center
MOB 6
East Business Professional (BP/SA-SR) BP Medical Offices West PD457 BP Sutter Roseville Medical Center
Environmental Setting
Both projects are located in an area of the campus that has been previously disturbed. Both project sites are developed with a surface parking lot, lighting, and landscaping. A temporary modular building and sterilization trailer are both located on the site where the MOB 7 is proposed. Again, both project areas have been previously disturbed and graded as part of the project improvements for the Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus.

Proposed Project
The project site is within the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan area. The two (2) proposed buildings are located within the existing 49-acre Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus, specifically on the northeastern area of the campus. The campus includes frontage on Secret Ravine Parkway and an entrance along East Roseville Parkway; the campus is predominately surrounded by open space along the south and west portions of the campus. Throughout the years the campus has been developed with a main hospital building, acute care buildings, and outlying medical buildings and parking garages. In 2006, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit which authorized expansion of the campus from the originally approved 804,000 square feet to 1,100,000 square feet. At full buildout, the Sutter Roseville Medical Center would contain a total of 738,500 square feet of licensed acute care spaces, 361,500 square feet of medical office building space for non-acute care and physician’s offices, and a total of 3,864 surface and parking structure spaces (parking space square footage is not included in the 1,100,000 square feet). The two (2) proposed projects are both within the previously analyzed and approved campus square footage. The applicant requests approval of two (2) Design Review Permits for the expansion of an existing five-story parking garage with a six-story parking addition and a new medical office building (MOB). The garage expansion is proposed to be located immediately to the east of the existing five-story parking garage and be connected to the future parking garage at each level; this would allow vehicles and pedestrians to go between the two sides. The new six-story parking addition would use the existing vehicles ramps on the existing parking garage to access each level of the new expansion. The architecture design of the proposed expansion would emulate the existing parking garage design, the same finish materials and color palette are proposed to be used on the proposed expansion. The proposed MOB 7 would be located along the east edge of the campus, north of the existing five-story parking garage and east of the existing MOB

4. The MOB site is surrounded by an existing private dental clinic to the south and an apartment complex to the east. The MOB project site is currently occupied by a temporary modular building and sterilization trailer, which both are proposed to be removed with the construction of MOB 7. The MOB 7 is proposed to be constructed in two-phases, Phase 1 would consists of the four-story building and Phase 2 would consist of a two-story addition on the front of the building (Figure 2). A private outdoor area is proposed along the east side of MOB 7, this private outdoor area would be used by the faculty and students of the new GME program. The overall architectural and site design of the project would emulate the existing campus aesthetics. As part of the MOB 7 construction, Sutter proposes a new Graduate Medical Education (GME) program on the first floor of MOB 7. As such, the applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit to permit the new GME program. The project site where the parking garage expansion and the new medical office building are proposed have been previously disturbed for surface parking.

I I

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Figure 2: Project Site Plan

CITY OF ROSEVILLE MITIGATION ORDINANCES, GUIDELINES, AND STANDARDS For projects that are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified, CEQA Guidelines section 15183(f) allows a lead agency to rely on previously adopted development policies or standards as mitigation for the environmental effects, when the standards have been adopted by the City, with findings based on substantial evidence, that the policies or standards will substantially mitigate environmental effects, unless substantial new information shows otherwise (CEQA Guidelines §15183(f)). The City of Roseville adopted CEQA Implementing Procedures (Implementing Procedures) which are consistent with this CEQA Guidelines section. The current version of the Implementing Procedures were adopted in April 2008 (Resolution 08-172), along with Findings of Fact, and were updated in January 2021 (Resolution 21-018). The below regulations and ordinances were found to provide uniform mitigating policies and standards, and are applicable to development projects. The City’s Mitigating Policies and Standards are referenced, where applicable, in the Initial Study Checklist. • Noise Regulation (RMC Ch.9.24)
• Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch.9.80)
• Traffic Mitigation Fee (RMC Ch.4.44)
• Drainage Fees (Dry Creek [RMC Ch.4.49] and Pleasant Grove Creek [RMC Ch.4.48]) {E}MOBl

J MEOICAL PLAZA
'
I
I
I
1-
1 (E) MOB4
4 MEDICAL PLAZA
------ --
\
'
Dreyfu ss + Bl ackford ~rch"tecture
\
\
' ' [

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
□
I ~~~=: PACKAGE
(E) BUILOING

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

• City of Roseville Improvement Standards (Resolution 02-37 and as further amended) • City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 01-208 and as further amended) • Tree Preservation Ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66)
• Internal Guidance for Management of Tribal Cultural Resources and Consultation (Tribal Consultation Policy) (Resolution 20-294)
• Subdivision Ordinance (RMC Title 18)
• Community Design Guidelines
• Specific Plan Design Guidelines:
o Development Guidelines Del Webb Specific Plan
o Landscape Design Guidelines for North Central Roseville Specific Plan o North Roseville Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Northeast Roseville Specific Plan (Olympus Pointe) Signage Guidelines o North Roseville Area Design Guidelines
o Northeast Roseville Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines o Southeast Roseville Specific Plan Landscape Design Guidelines o Stoneridge Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Highland Reserve North Specific Plan and Design Guidelines o West Roseville Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Sierra Vista Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Creekview Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
o Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan and Design Guidelines
• City of Roseville 2035 General Plan

OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON
• 2035 General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report, certified August 5, 2020 • Northeast Roseville Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH #86042805), adopted March 11, 1987
• Sutter Roseville Medical Center Master Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH #90020142 and 93092081)
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, any project which is consistent with the development densities established by zoning, a Community Plan, or a General Plan for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as may be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The 2035 General Plan Update EIR (General Plan EIR) updated all Citywide analyses, including for vehicle miles traveled, greenhouse gas emissions, water supply, water treatment, wastewater treatment, and waste disposal. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted land use designations examined within the environmental documents listed above, and thus this Initial Study focuses on effects particular to the specific project site, impacts which were not analyzed within the EIR, and impacts which may require revisiting due to substantial new information. When applicable, the topical sections within the Initial Study summarize the findings within the environmental documents listed above. The analysis, supporting technical materials, and findings of the environmental document are incorporated by reference, and are available for review at the Civic Center, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

EXPLANATION OF INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines recommend that lead agencies use an Initial Study Checklist to determine potential impacts of the proposed project on the physical environment. The Initial Study Checklist provides a list of questions concerning a comprehensive array of environmental issue areas potentially affected by this project. This section of the Initial Study incorporates a portion of Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form, contained in the CEQA Guidelines. Within each topical section (e.g. Air Quality) a description of the setting is provided, followed by the checklist responses, thresholds used, and finally a discussion of each checklist answer.

There are four (4) possible answers to the Environmental Impacts Checklist on the following pages. Each possible answer is explained below:
1) A “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from the information that a fair argument based on substantial evidence can be made to support a conclusion that a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change may occur to any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project. When one or more “Potentially significant Impact” entries are made, an EIR is required.
2) A “Less Than Significant With Mitigation” answer is appropriate when the lead agency incorporates mitigation measures to reduce an impact from “Potentially Significant” to “Less than Significant.” For example, floodwater impacts could be reduced from a potentially-significant level to a less-thansignificant level by relocating a building to an area outside of the floodway. The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation measures are identified as MM followed by a number. 3) A “Less Than significant Impact” answer is appropriate if there is evidence that one or more environmental impacts may occur, but the impacts are determined to be less than significant, or the application of development policies and standards to the project will reduce the impact(s) to a less-than-significant level. For instance, the application of the City’s Improvement Standards reduces potential erosion impacts to a less-than-significant level.
4) A “No Impact” answer is appropriate where it can be demonstrated that the impact does not have the potential to adversely affect the environment. For instance, a project in the center of an urbanized area with no agricultural lands on or adjacent to the project area clearly would not have an adverse effect on agricultural resources or operations. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources cited in the Initial Study. Where a “No Impact” answer is adequately supported by the information sources cited in the Initial Study, further narrative explanation is not required. A “No Impact” answer is explained when it is based on projectspecific factors as well as generous standards.

All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off- and on-site, indirect, direct, construction, and operation impacts, except as provided for under State CEQA Guidelines.

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
I. Aesthetics
The Project is located in a developed area of the City, specifically in the eastern portion of the City. Each site is developed with a surface parking lot with lighting and landscaping. The MOB 7 site currently hosts a temporary modular building and a trailer, both of which will be removed upon the construction of MOB 7. The site is

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

surrounded by residential and business professional office uses. The area surrounding the Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus has been developed with office buildings, single-family, and multi-family dwelling units.

The only public view of the Project is from Secret Ravine Parkway (see Figure 3). The Parking Garage Expansion is set approximately 398-feet from the closest apartment building to the north and approximately 520-feet from the closest single-family residential dwelling unit to the south. Surrounding the proposed Parking Garage Expansion is the existing five-story parking garage and several two and three-story Sutter medical office buildings. Conversely, the proposed MOB 7 is proposed adjacent to the existing multi-family apartment complex to the northeast, existing single-story medical offices to the southeast, and an existing Sutter medical office and a five-story parking garage to the south and east respectively. The project applicant prepared visual analysis illustrating the proposed Parking Garage Expansion and MOB 7 in comparison to the existing visual aesthetics of the area (Attachment #1). Additionally, the applicant provided night time view studies for both proposed buildings which illustrate the proposed parking garage and MOB providing a similar light glare as the existing parking garage and MOBs in the vicinity (Attachment #2).

Figure 3: View from Secret Ravine Parkway
Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
X

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED --
PARKING GARAGE 12

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources,
including, but not limited
to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state
scenic highway?
X
c) In non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of
the site and its
surroundings? (Public
views are those that are
experienced from a
publicly accessible
vantage point.) If the
project is in an urbanized
area, would the project
conflict with applicable
zoning and other
regulations governing
scenic quality?
X
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare,
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of an environmental impact cannot always be determined through the use of a specific, quantifiable threshold. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b) affirms this by the statement “an ironclad definition of significant effect is not always possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting.” This is particularly true of aesthetic impacts. As an example, a proposed parking lot in a dense urban center would have markedly different visual effects than a parking lot in an open space area. For the purpose of this study, the significance thresholds are as stated in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, as shown in a–d of the checklist below. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the Zoning Ordinance (e.g. building height, setbacks, etc), Subdivision Ordinance (RMC Ch. 18), Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347), and applicable Specific Plan Policies and/or Specific Plan Design Guidelines will prevent significant impacts in urban settings as it relates to items a, b, and c, below.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) There are no designated or eligible scenic vistas or scenic highways within or adjacent to the City of Roseville.
c) The project site is in an urban setting, and as a result lacks any prominent or high-quality natural features which could be negatively impacted by development. The City of Roseville has adopted Community Design Guidelines (CDG) for the purpose of creating building and community designs which are a visual asset to the

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

community. The CDG includes guidelines for building design, site design and landscape design, which will result in a project that enhances the existing urban visual environment. The parking garage expansion is proposed to be six (6) floors in height, one (1) floor taller than the existing five (5) story parking garage. The garage expansion is proposed to be located immediately to the east of the existing five-story parking garage and be connected to the future parking garage at each level; this would allow vehicles and pedestrians to go between the two sides. The new six-story parking addition would use the existing vehicles ramps on the existing parking garage to access each level of the new expansion. The site and surrounding properties are developed with a hospital, office buildings, single-family dwelling units, and lodging services (e.g. hotels). The project applicant prepared a visual analysis which shows the project will have minimal impacts on visual resources (Attachment #1). As proposed, light and glare will not increase above the existing condition. Light and glare associated with the proposed project would result from the proposed parking garage expansion and the exterior MOB lighting. Existing light and glare from the parking garage is already present, the parking garage expansion light and glare would mirror the existing parking garage. The MOB 7 has the potential of creating additional daytime glare caused by the reflections from the windows on the building, however, the additional glare would not be substantially different than what is currently present from the existing MOB buildings on the site. Sources of light and glare exist along the major roadways in the project vicinity, the applicant has prepared a Nighttime View Study for both the parking garage expansion and the MOB 7 (Attachment #2). Accordingly, the aesthetic impacts of the project are less than significant.
d) The project involves nighttime lighting to provide for the security and safety of project users (Attachment #2). However, the project is already located within an urbanized setting with many existing lighting sources.

Lighting is conditioned to comply with City standards (i.e. CDG) to limit the height of light standards and to require cut-off lenses and glare shields to minimize light and glare impacts. The project will not create a new source of substantial light. None of the project elements are highly reflective, and thus the project will not contribute to an increased source of glare.

II. Agricultural & Forestry Resources
The State Department of Conservation oversees the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, which was established to document the location, quality, and quantity of agricultural lands, and the conversion of those lands over time. The primary land use classifications on the maps generated through this program are: Urban and Built Up Land, Grazing Land, Farmland of Local Importance, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Prime Farmland. According to the current California Department of Conservation Placer County Important Farmland Map (2012), the majority of the City of Roseville is designated as Urban and Built Up Land and most of the open space areas of the City are designated as Grazing Land. There are a few areas designated as Farmland of Local Importance and two small areas designated as Unique Farmland located on the western side of the City along Baseline Road. The current Williamson Act Contract map (2013/2014) produced by the Department of Conservation shows that there are no Williamson Act contracts within the City, and only one (on PFE Road) that is adjacent to the City. None of the land within the City is considered forest land by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources
Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
X
b) Conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act
contract?
X
c) Conflict with existing
zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public
Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public
Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as
defined by Government
Code section 51104(g))?
X
d) Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest
use?
X
e) Involve other changes in
the existing environment
which, due to their location
or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Prime Farmland are called out as protected farmland categories within CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. Neither the City nor the State has adopted quantified significance thresholds related to impacts to protected farmland categories or to agricultural and forestry resources. For the purpose of this study, the significance thresholds are as stated in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, as shown in a–e of the checklist above.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–e) The project site is not used for agricultural purposes, does not include agricultural zoning, is not within or adjacent to one of the areas of the City designated as a protected farmland category on the Placer County Important Farmland map, is not within or adjacent to land within a Williamson Act Contract, and is not considered forest land. Given the foregoing, the proposed project will have no impact on agricultural resources.

III. Air Quality
The City of Roseville, along with the south Placer County area, is located in the Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB). The SVAB is within the Sacramento Federal Ozone Non-Attainment Area. Under the Clean Air Act, Placer County has been designated a "serious non-attainment" area for the federal 8-hour ozone standard, “nonattainment” for the state ozone standard, and a "non-attainment" area for the federal and state PM10 standard (particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter). Within Placer County, the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) is responsible for ensuring that emission standards are not violated. Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
X
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard?
X
c) Expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
X
d) Result in other emissions
(such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting
a substantial number of
people?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

In responding to checklist items a–c, project-related air emissions would have a significant effect if they would result in concentrations that either violate an ambient air quality standard or contribute to an existing air quality violation. To assist in making this determination, the PCAPCD adopted thresholds of significance, which were developed by considering both the health-based ambient air quality standards and the attainment strategies outlined in the State Implementation Plan. The PCAPCD-recommended significance threshold for reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) is 82 pounds daily during construction and 55 pounds daily during operation, and for particulate matter (PM) is 82 pounds per day during both construction and operation.

For all other constituents, significance is determined based on the concentration-based limits in the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards. Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) are also of public health concern, but no thresholds or standards are provided because they are considered to have no safe level of exposure. Analysis

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

of TAC is based on the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook – A Community Health Perspective (April 2005, California Air Resources Board), which lists TAC sources and recommended buffer distances from sensitive uses. For checklist item c, the PCAPCD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Handbook) recommends that the same thresholds used for the project analysis be used for the cumulative impact analysis.

With regard to checklist item d, there are no quantified significance thresholds for exposure to objectionable odors or other emissions. Significance is determined after taking into account multiple factors, including screening distances from odor sources (as found in the PCAPCD CEQA Handbook), the direction and frequency of prevailing winds, the time of day when emissions are detectable/present, and the nature and intensity of the emission source.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–c) Analyses are not included for sulfur dioxide, lead, and other constituents because there are no mass emission thresholds; these are concentration-based limits in the Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards which require substantial, point-source emissions (e.g. refineries, concrete plants, etc) before exceedance will occur, and the SVAB is in attainment for these constituents. Likewise, carbon monoxide is not analyzed because the SVAB is in attainment for this constituent, and it requires high localized concentrations (called carbon monoxide “hot spots”) before the ambient air quality standard would be exceeded. “Hot spots” are typically associated with heavy traffic congestion occurring at high-volume roadway intersections. The General Plan EIR analysis of Citywide traffic indicated that more than 70% of signalized intersections would operate at level of service C or better—that is, they will not experience heavy traffic congestion. It further indicated that analyses of existing CO concentrations at the most congested intersections in Roseville show that CO levels are well below federal and state ambient air quality standards. The discussions below focus on emissions of ROG, NOx, or PM. A project-level analysis has been prepared to determine whether the project will, on a singular level, exceed the established thresholds.

The Project involves construction of a 100,000 square foot medical office building and a 191,957 square foot parking garage expansion on a 2.58-acre project area. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2020.4.0 was used to model the construction emission of the Project (see Attachment #3). According to the model results, the project will result in maximum daily emissions of 5.66 lb/day of ROG and 17 lb/day pf NOx during construction; these emissions fall below the 82-lb/day thresholds for these constituents. Therefore, construction air quality impacts are less than significant.

The PCAPCD maintains screening thresholds to determine when modeling is required to evaluate impacts resulting from project operation. The screening thresholds indicates a General Office project must involve more than 648,000 square feet of building area before the PCAPCD significance thresholds for criteria pollutants are likely to be exceed. The proposed MOB includes 100,000 square feet of building area, and the parking garage expansion includes approximately 200,000 square feet of building area, which is well below the screening thresholds; therefore, the project will not result in operational emissions which exceed established thresholds.

The proposed project would not exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for air pollutant emissions during construction or operation. As such, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (which is the SIP) or contribute substantially to the PCAPCD’s nonattainment status for ozone. In addition, because the proposed project would not produce substantial emissions of criteria air pollutants, CO, or TACs, adjacent residents would not be exposed to significant levels of pollutant concentrations during construction or operation. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts, and consistent with the analysis methodology outlined in the Significance Thresholds and Regulatory Setting section, cumulative impacts are less than significant.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

With regard to TAC, there are hundreds of constituents which are considered toxic, but they are typically generated by stationary sources like gas stations, facilities using solvents, and heavy industrial operations. The proposed project is not a TAC-generating use, nor is it within the specified buffer area of a TAC-generating use, as established in the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook – A Community Health Perspective. Impacts due to substantial pollutant concentrations are less than significant. d) Diesel fumes from construction equipment and delivery trucks are often found to be objectionable; however, construction is temporary and diesel emissions are minimal and regulated. Typical urban projects such as residences and retail businesses generally do not result in substantial objectionable odors when operated in compliance with City Ordinances (e.g. proper trash disposal and storage). The Project is a typical urban development that lacks any characteristics that would cause the generation of substantial unpleasant odors.

Thus, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. A review of the project surroundings indicates that there are no substantial odor-generating uses near the project site; the project location meets the recommended screening distances from odor-generators provided by the PCAPCD. Impacts related to odors are less than significant.

IV. Biological Resources
The Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus is developed with office buildings, surface parking lots, parking garages, and landscaping. The Project site has been previously disturbed for the construction of the surface parking lots. No natural resources exist on the subject property; therefore, no impacts to biological resources are expected.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat
modifications, on any
species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in
local or regional plans,
policies or regulations, or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
b) Have a substantial
adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural
community identified in
local or regional plans,
policies or regulations or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
c) Have a substantial
adverse effect on state or
federally protected
wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal,
filling, hydrological
interruption, or other
means?
X
d) Interfere substantially with
the movement of any
native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established
native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery
sites?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
X
f) Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

There is no ironclad definition of significance as it relates to biological resources. Thus, the significance of impacts to biological resources is defined by the use of expert judgment supported by facts, and relies on the policies, codes, and regulations adopted by the City and by regulatory agencies which relate to biological resources (as cited and described in the Discussion of Checklist Answers section). Thresholds for assessing the significance of environmental impacts are based on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–f, above.

Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15065, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if:

The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; [or] substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species . . .

Various agencies regulate impacts to the habitats and animals addressed by the CEQA Guidelines checklist.

These include the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration– Fisheries, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The primary regulations affecting biological resources are described in the sections below.

Checklist item a addresses impacts to special status species. A “special status” species is one which has been identified as having relative scarcity and/or declining populations. Special status species include those formally listed as threatened or endangered, those proposed for formal listing, candidates for federal listing, and those classified as species of special concern. Also included are those species considered to be “fully protected” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (California Fish and Wildlife), those granted “special animal” status for tracking and monitoring purposes, and those plant species considered to be rare, threatened, or endangered in California by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). The primary regulatory protections for special status species are within the Federal Endangered Species Act, California Endangered Species Act, California Fish and Game Code, and the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Checklist item b addresses all “sensitive natural communities” and riparian (creekside) habitat that may be affected by local, state, or federal regulations/policies while checklist item c focuses specifically on one type of such a community: protected wetlands. Focusing first on wetlands, the 1987 Army Corps Wetlands Delineation Manual is used to determine whether an area meets the technical criteria for a wetland. A delineation verification by the Army Corps verifies the size and condition of the wetlands and other waters in question, and determines

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

the extent of government jurisdiction as it relates to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act and Section 401 of the State Clean Water Act.

The Clean Water Act protects all “navigable waters”, which are defined as traditional navigable waters that are or were used for commerce, or may be used for interstate commerce; tributaries of covered waters; and wetlands adjacent to covered waters, including tributaries. Non-navigable waters are called isolated wetlands, and are not subject to either the Federal or State Clean Water Act. Thus, isolated wetlands are not subject to federal wetland protection regulations. However, in addition to the Clean Water Act, the State also has jurisdiction over impacts to surface waters through the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne), which does not require that waters be “navigable”. For this reason, isolated wetlands are regulated by the State of California pursuant to Porter-Cologne. The City of Roseville General Plan also provides protection for wetlands, including isolated wetlands, pursuant to the General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Federal, State and City regulations/policies all seek to achieve no net loss of wetland acreage, values, or function.

Aside from wetlands, checklist item b also addresses other “sensitive natural communities” and riparian habitat, which includes any habitats protected by local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The City of Roseville General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element includes policies for the protection of riparian areas and floodplain areas; these are Vegetation and Wildlife section Policies 2 and 3. Policy 4 also directs preservation of additional area around stream corridors and floodplain if there is sensitive woodland, grassland, or other habitat which could be made part of a contiguous open space area. Other than wetlands, which were already discussed, US Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Wildlife habitat protections generally result from species protections, and are thus addressed via checklist item a.

For checklist item d, there are no regulations specific to the protection of migratory corridors. This item is addressed by an analysis of the habitats present in the vicinity and analyzing the probable effects on access to those habitats which will result from a project.

The City of Roseville Tree Preservation ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66) requires protection of native oak trees, and compensation for oak tree removal. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City of Roseville Tree Preservation ordinance (RMC Ch.19.66) will prevent significant impacts related to loss of native oak trees, referenced by item e, above.

Regarding checklist item f, there are no adopted Habitat Conservation Plans within the City of Roseville.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a-c, e) As previously discussed, the Sutter Roseville Medical Center campus is developed with office buildings, surface parking lots, and landscaping; which does not contain native trees, shrubs, wetland resources, or other sensitive natural communities which are protected by federal, state, or local policies. The entire campus is surrounded by a paved roadway and other development. No natural resources exist on the Project site; therefore, no impacts to biological resources are expected.
d) The City includes an interconnected network of open space corridors and preserves located throughout the City, to ensure that the movement of wildlife is not substantially impeded as the City develops. The development of the project site will not negatively impact these existing and planned open space corridors, nor is the project site located in an area that has been designated by the City, United States Fish and Wildlife, or California Department of Fish and Wildlife as vital or important for the movement of wildlife or the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
f) There are no Habitat Conservation Plans; Natural Community Conservation Plans; or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans that apply to the project site.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

V. Cultural Resources
As described within the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the Roseville region was within the territory of the Nisenan (also Southern Maidu or Valley Maidu). Two large permanent Nisenan habitation sites have been identified and protected within the City’s open space (in Maidu Park). Numerous smaller cultural resources, such as midden deposits and bedrock mortars, have also been recorded in the City. The gold rush which began in 1848 marked another settlement period, and evidence of Roseville’s ranching and mining past are still found today. Historic features include rock walls, ditches, low terraces, and other remnants of settlement and activity. A majority of documented sites within the City are located in areas designated for open space uses.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an historic
resource pursuant to in
Section 15064.5?
X
b) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to Section
15064.5?
X
c) Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of
dedicated cemeteries?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts to cultural resources is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. The Archaeological, Historic, and Cultural Resources section of the City of Roseville General Plan also directs the proper evaluation of and, when feasible, protection of significant resources (Policies 1 and 2).

There are also various federal and State regulations regarding the treatment and protection of cultural resources, including the National Historic Preservation Act and the Antiquities Act (which regulate items of significance in history), Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code (which regulates the treatment of human remains) and Section 21073 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code (regarding Tribal Cultural Resources). The CEQA Guidelines also contains specific sections, other than the checklist items, related to the treatment of effects on historic resources.

Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, if it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts to be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (Section 21083.2 (a), (b), and (c)). A historical resource is a resource listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (Section 21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (Section 15064.5(a)(2)); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which a lead agency determines to be

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

historically significant (Section 15064.5 (a)(3)). Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing on the CRHR.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b and d) The Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR identified sites in the Specific Plan as unreported prehistoric sites. The sites identified in the Specific Plan are not within the proposed project site. However, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to cultural resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; project-specific impacts are less than significant.
c) No paleontological resources are known to exist on the project site per the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; however, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to such resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; projectspecific impacts are less than significant.

VI. Energy
Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?
X
b) Conflict with or obstruct a
state or local plan for
renewable energy or
energy inefficiency?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Established in 2002, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) currently requires that 33 percent of electricity retail sales by served by renewable energy resources by 2020, and 50 percent by 2030. The City published a Renewables Portfolio Standard Procurement Plan in June 2018, and continues to comply with the RPS reporting and requirements and standards. There are no numeric significance thresholds to define “wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary” energy consumption, and therefore significance is based on CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b, above, and by the use of expert judgment supported by facts, relying on the policies, codes, and regulations adopted by the City and by regulatory agencies which relate to energy. The analysis considers compliance with regulations and standards, project design as it relates to energy use (including transportation energy), whether the project will result in a substantial unplanned demand on the City’s energy resources, and whether the project will impede the ability of the City to meet the RPS standards.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a & b) The project would consume energy both during project construction and during project operation. During construction, fossil fuels, electricity, and natural gas would be used by construction vehicles and equipment.

However, the energy consumed during construction would be temporary, and would not represent a significant demand on available resources. There are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment or methods that would be less energy-efficient or which would be wasteful.

The completed project would consume energy related to building operation, exterior lighting, landscape irrigation and maintenance, and vehicle trips to and from the use. In accordance with California Energy Code Title 24, the project would be required to meet the Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This includes standards for water and space heating and cooling equipment; insulation for doors, pipes, walls, and ceilings; and appliances, to name a few. The project would also be eligible for rebates and other financial incentives from both the electric and gas providers for the purchase of energy-efficient appliances and systems, which would further reduce the operational energy demand of the project. The project was distributed to both PG&E and Roseville Electric for comments, and was found to conform to the standards of both providers; energy supplies are available to serve the project.

The project is consistent with the existing land use designation in the Specific Plan. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan included an assessment of energy impacts for the entire plan area. The analysis included consideration of transportation energy, and evaluated walkability, alternative transportation modes, and the degree to which the mix and location of uses would reduce vehicle miles traveled in the plan area. The EIR also included a citywide assessment of energy demand based on the existing and proposed land uses within the City and Specific Plan. Impacts related to energy consumption were found to be less than significant. The project is consistent with the existing land use designation, and therefore is consistent with the current citywide assessment of energy demand, and will not result in substantial unplanned, inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy; impacts are less than significant.

VII. Geology and Soils
As described in the Safety Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, there are three inactive faults (Volcano Hill, Linda Creek, and an unnamed fault) in the vicinity, but there are no known active seismic faults within Placer County. The last seismic event recorded in the South Placer area occurred in 1908, and is estimated to have been at least a 4.0 on the Richter Scale. Due to the geographic location and soil characteristics within the City, the General Plan indicates that soil liquefaction, landslides, and subsidence are not a significant risk in the area.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:

X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
i) Ruptures of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or
based on other
substantial evidence of a
known fault? (Refer to
Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication

42.)
X
ii) Strong seismic ground
shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground
failure, including
liquefaction?
X
iv) Landslides? X
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
X
c) Be located in a geological
unit or soil that is unstable,
or that would become
unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially
result in on or off-site
landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
X
d) Be located on expansive
soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct
or indirect risks to life or
property?
X
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater
disposal systems where
sewers are not available
for the disposal of
wastewater?
X
f) Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource or
site or unique geological
feature?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to geology and soils is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–f listed above. Regulations applicable to this topic include the Alquist-Priolo Act, which addresses earthquake safety in building permits, and the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, which requires the state to gather and publish data on the location and risk of seismic faults. The Archaeological, Historic, and Cultural Resources section of the City of Roseville General Plan also directs the proper evaluation of and, when feasible, protection of significant archeological resources, which for this evaluation will include paleontological resources (Policies 1 and 2). Section 50987.5 of the California Public Code Section is only applicable to public land; this section prohibits the excavation, removal, destruction, or defacement/injury to any vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints or other paleontological feature.

The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch.9.80) and Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07-107) will prevent significant impacts related to checklist item b. The Ordinance and standards include permit requirements for construction and development in erosion-prone areas and ensure that grading activities will not result in significant soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The use of septic tanks or alternative waste systems is not permitted in the City of Roseville, and therefore no analysis of criterion e is necessary.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving seismic shaking, ground failure or landslides.
i–iii) According to United States Geological Service mapping and literature, active faults are largely considered to be those which have had movement within the last 10,000 years (within the Holocene or Historic time periods)1 and there are no major active faults in Placer County. The California Geological Survey has prepared a map of the state which shows the earthquake shaking potential of areas throughout California based primarily on an area’s distance from known active faults. The map shows that the City lies in a relatively lowintensity ground-shaking zone. Commercial, institutional, and residential buildings as well as all related infrastructure are required, in conformance with Chapter 16, Structural Design Requirements, Division IV, Earthquake Design of the California Building Code, to lessen the exposure to potentially damaging vibrations through seismic-resistant design. In compliance with the Code, all structures in the Project area would be wellbuilt to withstand ground shaking from possible earthquakes in the region; impacts are less than significant. iv) Landslides typically occur where soils on steep slopes become saturated or where natural or manmade conditions have taken away supporting structures and vegetation. The existing and proposed slopes of the project site are not steep enough to present a hazard during development or upon completion of the project. In addition, measures would be incorporated during construction to shore minor slopes and prevent potential earth movement. Therefore, impacts associated with landslides are less than significant. b) Grading activities will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction and over-covering of soils associated with site preparation (grading and trenching for utilities). Grading activities for the project will be limited to the project site. Grading activities require a grading permit from the Engineering Division. The grading permit is reviewed for compliance with the City’s Improvement Standards, including the provision of proper drainage, appropriate dust control, and erosion control measures. Grading and erosion control measures will be incorporated into the required grading plans and improvement plans. Therefore, the impacts associated with disruption, displacement, and compaction of soils associated with the project are less than significant.

1 United States Geological Survey, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=active%20fault, Accessed January 2016

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

c, d) A review of the Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Placer County, accessed via the Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/), indicates that the soils on the site are Exchequer very stony loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes, which are not listed as geologically unstable or sensitive. f) No paleontological resources are known to exist on the project site per the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; however, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to such resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; projectspecific impacts are less than significant.

VIII. Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse gases trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere. The principal greenhouse gases (GHGs) that enter the atmosphere because of human activities are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and fluorinated gases. As explained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency2 , global average
temperature has increased by more than 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since the late 1800s, and most of the warming of the past half century has been caused by human emissions. The City has taken proactive steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which include the introduction of General Plan policies to reduce emissions, changes to City operations, and climate action initiatives.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have
a significant impact on the
environment?
X
b) Conflict with an applicable
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

In Assembly Bill 32 (the California Global Warming Solutions Act), signed by Governor Schwarzenegger of California in September 2006, the legislature found that climate change resulting from global warming was a threat to California, and directed that “the State Air Resources Board design emissions reduction measures to meet the statewide emissions limits for greenhouse gases . . .”. The target established in AB 32 was to reduce emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. CARB subsequently prepared the Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) for California, which was approved in 2008. The Scoping Plan provides the outline for actions to reduce California’s GHG emissions, and has been updated twice.

The current 2017 Scoping Plan updated the target year from 2020 to 2030, based on the targets established in Senate Bill 32 (SB 32). SB 32 was signed by the Governor on September 8, 2016, to establish a reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Critically, the 2017 Scoping Plan also sets the path toward compliance

2 http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/overview.html, Accessed January 2016

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

with the 2050 target embodied within Executive Order S-3-05 as well. According to the 2017 Scoping Plan the statewide 2030 target is 260 million metric tons. The Scoping Plan recommends an efficiency target approach for local governments for 2030 and 2050 target years.

The Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) recommends that thresholds of significance for GHG be related to statewide reduction goals and has adopted thresholds of significance which take into account the 2030 reduction target. The thresholds include a de minimis and a bright-line maximum threshold, as well as residential and non-residential efficiency thresholds. However, the City developed its own thresholds as part of the 2035 General Plan Update project approved in July 2020. The justification for the City’s thresholds is contained within the General Plan EIR. The thresholds were developed based on statewide emissions data adjusted for relevant local conditions and land uses. The significance thresholds are shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1: GHG Significance Thresholds
2020 2030 2035 2050
Per Capita Emissions Efficiency Targets
(MT CO2e/capita/yr) 7.21 4.00 3.22 1.19
Per Service Population Emissions
Efficiency Targets
(MT CO2e/SP/yr)

5.07 2.79 2.25 0.83
Projects which use these thresholds for environmental analysis should include a brief justification of the type of efficiency target and the target year selected. Per capita is most applicable to projects which only include residential uses, or in cases where reliable data to generate a service population estimate is unavailable. Projects should generally use the 2035 target year. Note that future projects consistent with the General Plan will not require further analysis, per the tiering provisions of CEQA.

Note: MMT CO2e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; Service Population (SP) = population + employment Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) Greenhouse gases are primarily emitted as a result of vehicle operation associated with trips to and from a project, and energy consumption from operation of the buildings. Greenhouse gases from vehicles is assessed based on the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) resulting from a project, on a Citywide basis. Residential projects, destination centers (such as a regional mall), and major employers tend to increase VMT in a study area, either by adding new residents traveling in an area, or by encouraging longer trip lengths and drawing in trips from a broader regional area. However, non-residential projects and neighborhood-serving uses (e.g. neighborhood parks) tend to lower VMT in a study area because they do not generate new trips within the study area, they divert existing trips. These trips are diverted because the new use location is closer to home, on their way to another destination (e.g. work), or is otherwise more convenient.

The Project proposes construction of a 100,000 square foot medical office building and expand the existing parking garage by approximately 200,000 square feet. As discussed in the Transportation section of this Initial Study, the project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and will not create additional trips that have not already been evaluated in the General Plan EIR.

The City’s General Plan Update (GPU) EIR included an analysis of GHG emissions, which would result from buildout of the City’s General Plan. The EIR concluded that General Plan build out would exceed the City’s threshold of 2.25 MT CO2e per service population and that the affect was cumulatively considerable. Although mitigation measures were adopted as part of the General Plan, those measures would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels and impacts were considered significant and unavoidable. The proposed project is consistent with the land use assumptions in the GPU EIR and does not require further analysis per the tiering provisions of CEQA. The project includes reasonable and feasible design measures to reduce emissions,

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

including implementation of the latest Cal-Green and energy efficiency code requirements. The medical office building will incorporate several alternative transportation measures like bike racks immediately in front of the medical office building. The project complies with General Plan policy related to GHG and the project does not result in any new GHG impacts not previously analyzed in the GPU EIR; therefore, impacts are less than significant.

Based on the foregoing, project-generated GHG emissions would not conflict with and are consistent with statewide goals for greenhouse gas emissions reduction. This impact is considered less than significant.

IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials
There are no hazardous cleanup sites of record within 1,000 feet of the Project site according to both the Department of Toxic Substances Control Envirostor database (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/) and the State Water Resources Control Envirostor (http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/). The project is not located on a site where existing hazardous materials have been identified, and the project does not have the potential to expose individuals to hazardous materials.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Create a significant hazard
to the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
X
b) Create a significant hazard
to the public or the
environment though
reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident
conditions involving the
release of hazardous
materials into the
environment?
X
c) Emit hazardous emissions
or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or
proposed school?
X
d) Be located on a site which
is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
e) For a project located within
an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would
the project result in a
safety hazard or excessive
noise for people residing
or working in the project
area?
X
f) Impair implementation of
or physically interfere with
an adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
X
g) Expose people or
structures either directly or
indirectly to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to hazardous materials is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–g listed above. A material is defined as hazardous if it appears on a list of hazardous materials prepared by a federal, state or local regulatory agency, or if it has characteristics defined as hazardous by such an agency.

The determination of significance based on the above criteria depends on the probable frequency and severity of consequences to people who might be exposed to the health hazard, and the degree to which Project design or existing regulations would reduce the frequency of or severity of exposure. As an example, products commonly used for household cleaning are classified as hazardous when transported in large quantities, but one would not conclude that the presence of small quantities of household cleaners at a home would pose a risk to a school located within ¼-mile.

Many federal and State agencies regulate hazards and hazardous substances, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water Board), and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CalOSHA). The state has been granted primacy (primary responsibility for oversight) by the US EPA to administer and enforce hazardous waste management programs. State regulations also have detailed planning and management requirements to ensure that hazardous materials are handled, stored, and disposed of properly to reduce human health risks. California regulations pertaining to hazardous waste management are published in the California Code of Regulations (see 8 CCR, 22 CCR, and 23 CCR).

The project is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private use airport. Therefore, no further discussion is provided for item e.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a, b) Standard construction activities would require the use of hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, lubricants, glues, paints and paint thinners, soaps, bleach, and solvents. These are common household and commercial materials routinely used by both businesses and average members of the public. The materials only pose a hazard if they are improperly used, stored, or transported either through upset conditions (e.g. a vehicle accident) or mishandling. In addition to construction use, the operational project would result in the use of common hazardous materials as well, including bleach, solvents, and herbicides. Regulations pertaining to the transport of materials are codified in 49 Code of Federal Regulations 171–180, and transport regulations are enforced and monitored by the California Department of Transportation and by the California Highway Patrol.

Specifications for storage on a construction site are contained in various regulations and codes, including the California Code of Regulations, the Uniform Fire Code, and the California Health and Safety Code. These same codes require that all hazardous materials be used and stored in the manner specified on the material packaging.

Existing regulations and programs are sufficient to ensure that potential impacts as a result of the use or storage of hazardous materials are reduced to less than significant levels. c) See response to Items (a) and (b) above. While development of the site will result in the use, handling, and transport of materials deemed to be hazardous, the materials in question are commonly used in both residential and commercial applications, and include materials such as bleach and herbicides. The project will not result in the use of any acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. d) The project is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.53
; therefore, no impact will occur.
e) This project is located within an area currently receiving City emergency services and development of the site has been anticipated and incorporated into emergency response plans. As such, the project will cause a less than significant impact to the City's Emergency Response or Management Plans. Furthermore, the project will be required to comply with all local, State and federal requirements for the handling of hazardous materials, which will ensure less-than-significant impacts. These will require the following programs:
• A Risk Management and Prevention Program (RMPP) is required of uses that handle toxic and/or hazardous materials in quantities regulated by the California Health and Safety Code and/or the City. • Businesses that handle toxic or hazardous materials are required to complete a Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) pursuant to local, State, or federal requirements. g) The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is the state agency responsible for wildland fire protection and management. As part of that task, CAL FIRE maintains maps designating Wildland Fire Hazard Severity zones. The City is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area; fire suppression is entirely within local responsibility. The project site is in an urban area, and therefore would not expose people to any risk from wildland fire. There would be no impact with regard to this criterion.

X. Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the City is located within the Pleasant Grove Creek Basin and the Dry Creek Basin. Pleasant Grove Creek and its tributaries drain most of the western and central areas of the City and Dry Creek and its tributaries drain the remainder of the City. Most major stream areas in the City are located within designated open space.

3 http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/SectionA.htm

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste
discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground
water quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge
such that the project may
impede sustainable
groundwater management
of the basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern
of the site or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of
a stream or river or
through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
i) result in substantial
erosion or siltation on
or off-site;
X
ii) substantially increase
the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a
manner which would
result in flooding onor off-site;
X
iii) create or contribute
runoff water which
would exceed the
capacity of existing or
planned stormwater
systems or provide
substantial additional
sources of polluted
runoff; or
X
iv) impede or redirect
flood flows? X
d) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water
quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
e) In flood hazard, tsunami,
or seiches zones, risk
release of pollutants due to
project innundation?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to hydrology and water quality is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. For checklist item a, c (i), d, and e, the Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City of Roseville Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07-107), Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch. 14.20), and Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 16-152) will prevent significant impacts related to water quality or erosion. The standards require preparation of an erosion and sediment control plan for construction activities and includes designs to control pollutants within post-construction urban water runoff. Likewise, it is indicated that the Drainage Fees for the Dry Creek and Pleasant Grove Watersheds (RMC Ch.4.48) and City of Roseville Design/Construction Standards (Resolution 07-107) will prevent significant impacts related to checklist items c (ii) and c (iii). The ordinance and standards require the collection of drainage fees to fund improvements that mitigate potential flooding impacts, and require the design of a water drainage system that will adequately convey anticipated stormwater flows without increasing the rate or amount of surface runoff. These same ordinances and standards prevent impacts related to groundwater (items a and d), because developers are required to treat and detain all stormwater onsite using stormwater swales and other methods which slow flows and preserve infiltration. Finally, it is indicated that compliance with the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (RMC Ch. 9.80) will prevent significant impacts related to items c (iv) and e. The Ordinance includes standard requirements for all new construction, including regulation of development with the potential to impede or redirect flood flows, and prohibits development within flood hazard areas. Impacts from tsunamis and seiches were screened out of the analysis (item e) because the project is not located near a water body or other feature that would pose a risk of such an event.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a,c (i),d, e) The project will involve the disturbance of on-site soils and the construction of impervious surfaces, such as asphalt paving and buildings. Disturbing the soil can allow sediment to be mobilized by rain or wind, and cause displacement into waterways. To address this and other issues, the developer is required to receive approval of a grading permit and/or improvement plants prior to the start of construction. The permit or plans are required to incorporate mitigation measures for dust and erosion control. In addition, the City has a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater Permit issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board which requires the City to reduce pollutants in stormwater to the maximum extent practicable. The City does this, in part, by means of the City’s 2016 Design/Construction Standards, which require preparation and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. All permanent stormwater quality control measures must be designed to comply with the City’s Manual for Stormwater Quality Control Standards for New Development, the City’s 2016 Design/Construction Standards, Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, and Stormwater Quality Design Manual. For these reasons, impacts related to water quality are less than significant. b, d) The project does not involve the installation of groundwater wells. The City maintains wells to supplement surface water supplies during multiple dry years, but the effect of groundwater extraction on the aquifer was addressed in the City’s Urban Water Master Plan and evaluated in the General Plan EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation, and is thus consistent with the citywide evaluation of water supply. Project impacts related to groundwater extraction are less than significant. Furthermore, all

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

permanent stormwater quality control measures must be designed to comply with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual, which requires the use of bioswales and other onsite detention and infiltration methods. These standards ensure that stormwater will continue to infiltrate into the groundwater aquifer. c (ii and iii)) The project has been reviewed by City Engineering staff for conformance with City ordinances and standards. The project includes adequate and appropriate facilities to ensure no net increase in the amount or rate of stormwater runoff from the site, and which will adequately convey stormwater flows. c (iv) and e) The project has been reviewed by City Engineering staff for conformance with City ordinances and standards. The project is not located within either the Federal Emergency Management Agency floodplain or the City’s Regulatory Floodplain (defined as the floodplain which will result from full buildout of the City).

Therefore, the project will not impede or redirect flood flows, nor will it be inundated. The proposed project is located within an area of flat topography and is not near a waterbody or other feature which could cause a seiche or tsunami. There would be no impact with regard to these criterion.

XI. Land Use and Planning
The Project site is located in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan and has a land use designation of Business Professional (BP) and a zoning designation of Planned Development for Medical Office (PD457). Surrounding land uses include an existing multi-family apartment complex to the north, a private dental clinic to the east, and an existing parking garage and medical office buildings to the south and west.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Physically divide an
established community? X
b) Cause a significant
environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land
use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency
adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to land use is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above. Consistency with applicable City General Plan policies, Improvement Standards, and design standards is already required and part of the City’s processing of permits and plans, so these requirements do not appear as mitigation measures.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project area has been master planned for development, including adequate roads, pedestrian paths, and bicycle paths to provide connections within the community. The project will not physically divide an established community.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

b) The proposed Project is consistent with the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan and does not conflict with policies or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental impact. Impacts are less than significant.

XII. Mineral Resources
The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975 requires the State Geologist to classify land into Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ’s) based on the known or inferred mineral resource potential of that land. The California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) was historically responsible for the classification and designation of areas containing—or potentially containing—significant mineral resources, though that responsibility now lies with the California Geological Survey (CGS). CDMG published Open File Report 95-10, which provides the mineral classification map for Placer County. A detailed evaluation of mineral resources has not been conducted within the City limits, but MRZ’s have been identified. There are four broad MRZ categories (MRZ-1 through MRZ-4), and only MRZ-2 represents an area of known significant mineral resources. The City of Roseville General Plan EIR included Exhibit 4.1-3, depicting the location of MRZ’s in the City limits. There is only one small MRZ-2 designation area, located at the far eastern edge of the City.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that
would be of value to the
region and the residents of
the state?
X
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource
recovery site delineated on
a local general plan,
specific plan or other land
use plan?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to mineral resources is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–b) The project site is not in the area of the City known to include any mineral resources that would be of local, regional, or statewide importance; therefore, the project has no impacts on mineral resources.

XIII. Noise
The Project consists of a new medical office building and an extension of an existing parking garage on the Sutter campus. Potential sources of noise at the medical office building include people talking, people moving in and out of the building, and vehicles moving throughout the Project site. Potential sources of noises at the parking garage expansion include vehicles moving through the parking garage. These are typical noises, which occur in any non-residential development and typically do not generate substantial noise volumes. Further, the Sutter

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Roseville Medical Center campus is developed with multiple medical office buildings within the vicinity of the Project area which are similar in nature to the proposed medical office building and parking expansion and would not generate new and substantial increase in noise. The nearest sensitive receptors are the residents within the multi-family dwelling units to the northeast of the Project site. The nearest apartment building to the Project site is approximately 120-feet away, the apartment building is located between a an existing wrought iron fence and proposed six-foot masonry wall, existing carports, and garages (Attachment 1).

Would the project result in:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the
project in excess of
standards established in
the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of
other agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive
ground borne vibration of
ground borne noise levels?
X
c) For a project located within
the vicinity of a private
airstrip or an airport land
use plan or, where such a
plan has not been
adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public
use airport, would the
project expose people
residing or working in the
project area to excessive
noise levels?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

Standards for transportation noise and non-transportation noise affecting existing or proposed land uses are established within the City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element, and these standards are used as the thresholds to determine the significance of impacts related to items a and c. The significance of other noise impacts is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items b and c listed above. The Findings of the Implementing Procedures indicate that compliance with the City Noise Regulation (RMC Ch. 9.24) will prevent significant non-transportation noise as it relates to items a and b. The Ordinance establishes noise exposure standards that protect noise-sensitive receptors from a variety of noise sources, including nontransportation/fixed noise, amplified sound, industrial noise, and events on public property. The project is not within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public or public use airport and there are also no private airstrips in the vicinity of the project area. Therefore, item c has been ruled out from further analysis.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The proposed Project includes construction of a medical office building and an extension to an existing parking garage. The Project anticipates short term increase of noise levels during the construction phase of the Project. Construction activities on the site could expose the nearby residents of the apartment complex to increase noise levels, including ground-born vibrations. These impacts are temporary in nature being associated with the construction of the Project and are not anticipated to result in any unusual or excessive ground-born vibration or noise levels. Further, the Project construction hours are limited by the City’s Municipal Code Section

9.24 to daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Saturday, Sunday, and Holidays). The parking garage and medical office building is a principally permitted use on the site, which typically generates low to moderate noise levels through the use of mechanical equipment, such as roof top air conditioning units. The medical office building is located in an area of the campus where other office buildings are present, similar in nature to the proposed office building. The parking garage is proposed as an extension of the existing parking garage, therefore, no new noise levels are proposed that are not already existing. Lastly, a unique component of the medical office building is the proposed graduate medical education (GME) physician training residency and fellowship programs. The GME is proposed to occupy the first floor of the medical office building and utilize the proposed outdoor patio area located at adjacent to the existing apartment complex. The students and faculty would utilize the outdoor patio area as a break area during and between their classes. The outdoor patio area would not generate new ambient noises not already present on campus. Typically with outdoor patio areas an increase in noise is associated with these areas as people converse outdoors. However, the increase in noise would not affect the adjacent residence as the applicant proposes to install a new 6-foot tall masonry wall and the patio area is proposed to sit significantly lower in grade to the apartment complex. Therefore, the project would not generate substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of City standards; thus, impacts are less than significant.
b) Surrounding uses may experience short-term increases in groundborne vibration, groundborne noise, and airborne noise levels during construction. However, these increases would only occur for a short period of time. When conducted during daytime hours, construction activities are exempt from Noise Ordinance standards, but the standards do apply to construction occurring during nighttime hours. While the noise generated may be a minor nuisance, the City Noise Regulation standards are designed to ensure that impacts are not unduly intrusive. Based on this, the impact is less than significant.

XIV. Population and Housing
The project site is located within the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan and has a land use designation of Business Professional (BP). The City of Roseville General Plan Table II-4 identifies the total number of residential units and population anticipated as a result of buildout of the City, and the Specific Plan likewise includes unit allocations and population projections for the Plan Area. Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Induce substantial
unplanned population
growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly
(for example, though
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating
the construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to population and housing is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a and b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The CEQA Guidelines identify several ways in which a project could have growth-inducing impacts (Public Resources Code Section 15126.2), either directly or indirectly. Growth-inducement may be the result of fostering economic growth, fostering population growth, providing new housing, or removing barriers to growth.

Growth inducement may be detrimental, beneficial, or of no impact or significance under CEQA. An impact is only deemed to occur when it directly or indirectly affects the ability of agencies to provide needed public services, or if it can be shown that the growth will significantly affect the environment in some other way. The project is consistent with the land use designation of the site. Therefore, while the project in question will induce some level of growth, this growth was already identified and its effects disclosed and mitigated within the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR. Therefore, the impact of the project is less than significant. b) The project site is vacant. No housing exists on the project site, and there would be no impact with respect to these criteria.

XV. Public Services
Fire protection, police protection, park services, and library services are provided by the City. The project is located within the Roseville Elementary School District and within the Roseville Joint Union High School District.

Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the following public services:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Other public facilities? X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to public services is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above. The EIR for the Specific Plan addressed the level of public services which would need to be

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

provided in order to serve planned growth in the community. Development Agreements and other conditions have been adopted in all proposed growth areas of the City which identify the physical facilities needed to serve growth, and the funding needed to provide for the construction and operation of those facilities and services; the project is consistent with the Specific Plan. In addition, the project has been routed to the various public service agencies, both internal and external, to ensure that the project meets the agencies’ design standards (where applicable) and to provide an opportunity to recommend appropriate conditions of approval.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) Existing City codes and regulations require adequate water pressure in the water lines, and construction must comply with the Uniform Fire and Building Codes used by the City of Roseville. Additionally, the applicant is required to pay a fire service construction tax, which is used for purchasing capital facilities for the Fire Department. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.
b) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer is required to pay fees into a Community Facilities District, which provides funding for police services. Sales taxes and property taxes resulting from the development will add revenue to the General Fund, which also serves to fund police services. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.
c) The applicant for this project is required to pay school impact fees at a rate determined by the local school districts. School fees will be collected prior to the issuance of building permits, consistent with City requirements.

School sites have already been designated as part of the Specific Plan process. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts. d) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer will be required to pay fees into a Community Facilities District, which provides funding for park services. Future park and recreation sites and facilities have already been identified as part of the Specific Plan process. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts. e) Pursuant to the Development Agreement for the project area, the developer will be required to pay fees into a Community Facilities District, which provides funding for the library system and other such facilities and services. In addition, the City charges fees to end-users for other services, such as garbage and greenwaste collection, in order to fund those services. Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.

XVI. Recreation
There are no existing or planned parks or other recreation facilities immediately adjacent to the Project site. The nearest recreation area is the Harry Crabb Park, located less than 0.40-miles east of the site on Secret Ravine Parkway and Scarborough Drive.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Would the project
increase the use of
existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other
recreational facilities such
that physical deterioration
of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
X
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to recreation services is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–b listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The EIR for the Specific Plan addressed the level of park services—including new construction, maintenance, and operations—which would need to be provided in order to serve planned growth in the community. Given that the project is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan, the project would not cause any unforeseen or new impacts related to the use of existing or proposed parks and recreational facilities.

Existing codes, regulations, funding agreements, and facilities plans are sufficient to ensure less than significant impacts.
b) Park sites and other recreational facilities were identified within the Specific Plan, and the plan-level impacts of developing those facilities were addressed within the Final EIR for the Specific Plan. The project will not cause any unforeseen or new impacts related to the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.

XVII. Transportation
Both the proposed medical office building and parking expansion have frontage on to Medical Plaza, which is a two-lane private roadway with left-turning lanes. Medical Plaza has fully constructed frontage improvements with bike lanes and sidewalks.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Conflict with a program,
plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
X
c) Substantially increase
hazards due to a
geometric design
feature(s) (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate
emergency access? X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The City has adopted the following plans, ordinances, or policies applicable to checklist item a: Pedestrian Master Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and Short-Range Transit Plan, and General Plan Circulation Element. The project is evaluated for consistency with these plans and the policies contained within them. For checklist item b, the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 establishes a detailed process for evaluating the significance of transportation impacts. In accordance with this section, the analysis must focus on the generation of vehicle miles traveled (VMT); effects on automobile delay cannot be considered a significant impact. The City developed analysis guidance and thresholds as part of the 2035 General Plan Update project approved in July 2020. The detailed evaluation and justification is contained within the General Plan EIR.

Future projects consistent with the General Plan will not require further VMT analysis, pursuant to the tiering provisions of CEQA. For projects which are inconsistent, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) allows lead agencies discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to rely on a qualitative analysis or performance-based standards. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) allows lead agencies the discretion to select their own thresholds and allow for differences in thresholds based on context.

Quantitative analysis would not be required if it can be demonstrated that the project would generate VMT which is equivalent to or less than what was assumed in the General Plan EIR. Examples of such projects include:
• Local-serving retail and other local-serving development, which generally reduces existing trip distances by providing services in closer proximity to residential areas, and therefore reduce VMT. • Multi-family residences, which generally have fewer trips per household than single-family residences, and therefore also produce less VMT per unit.

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

• Infill projects in developed areas generally have shorter trips, reduced vehicle trips, and therefore less VMT.
• Pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and electric vehicle transportation projects. • Residential projects in low per-capita household VMT areas and office projects in low per-worker VMT areas (85 percent or less than the regional average) as shown on maps maintained by SACOG or within low VMT areas as shown within Table 4.3-8 of the General Plan EIR.

When quantitative analysis is required, the threshold of 12.8 VMT/capita may be used for projects not within the scope of the General Plan EIR, provided the cumulative context of the 2035 General Plan has not changed substantially. Since approval of the 2035 General Plan, the City has not annexed new land, substantially changed roadway network assumptions, or made any other changes to the 2035 assumptions which would require an update to the City’s VMT thresholds contained within the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the threshold of 12.8 VMT/capita remains appropriate.

Given the Project is consistent with the General Plan, further VMT analysis is not required pursuant to the tiering provisions of CEQA.

Impacts with regard to items c and d are assessed based on the expert judgment of the City Engineer and City Fire Department, as based upon facts and consistency with the City’s Design and Construction Standards.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The City of Roseville has adopted a Pedestrian Master Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and Short-Range Transit Plan. The project was reviewed for consistency with these documents. The medical office building proposes 17 short-term bicycle parking spaces and the parking garage proposes 7 short-term bicycle parking spaces and 24 long-term bicycle parking spaces in the parking garage. Because the Project is proposed in an area of the campus where public improvements are present, the Project would not be required to install new public improvements. The proposed Project is consistent with the underlying land use designation and does not contribute new, unanticipated trips; a cumulative conditions traffic model is not required. b) Traffic analyses focus on the number of trips traveling in specified areas during peak periods, in order to quantify impacts as specific intersections. However, there is no direct relationship between the number of trips and the amount of VMT generated by a use. Projects which substantially increase trips to a specific area may in fact decrease VMT in the City. As an example, if a new grocery store is added to an area, customers who go to that store were already going to a grocery store elsewhere, and are most likely to choose the new store because it is closer to home or on their way to another location (e.g. work). So while the store would generate substantial new trips, it would lower Citywide VMT. Unless a project includes unique characteristics, nonresidential projects do not increase VMT; they divert existing trips into a similar or more efficient pathway. The parking garage expansion and MOB 7 are both consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The proposed parking addition and new MOB 7 were previously analyzed and included in the 2006 approved CUP. The Planning Commission in 2006 approved the expansion of the campus from the originally approved 804,000 square feet to 1,100,000 square feet. The proposed parking garage expansion and MOB 7 were both anticipated and analyzed in the Sutter campus expansion from 2006. Further, the Sutter campus expansion was reviewed and anticipated in the General Plan Update. Assumptions of the overall campus and square footage are consistent with the General Plan update and the previously approved campus expansion. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
c, d) The project has been reviewed by the City Engineering and City Fire Department staff, and has been found to be consistent with the City’s Design Standards. Furthermore, standard conditions of approval added to

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

all City project require compliance with Fire Codes and other design standards. Compliance with existing regulations ensure that impacts are less than significant.

XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources
As described within the Open Space and Conservation Element of the City of Roseville General Plan, the Roseville region was within the territory of the Nisenan (also Southern Maidu or Valley Maidu). Two large permanent Nisenan habitation sites have been identified and protected within the City’s open space (in Maidu Park). Numerous smaller cultural resources, such as midden deposits and bedrock mortars, have also been recorded in the City. A majority of documented sites within the City are located in areas designated for open space uses.

Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register
of Historical Resources, or
in a local register of
historical resources as
defined in Public
Resources Code section
5020.1(k)?
X
b) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1? In applying the
criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section
5024.1 the lead agency
shall consider the
significance of the
resource to a California
Native American tribe.

X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

In addition to archeological resources, tribal cultural resources are also given particular treatment. Tribal cultural resources are defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074, as either 1) a site, feature, place, geographically-defined cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, that is listed or eligible for listing on the California Register or Historical Resources, or on a local register of historical resources or as 2) a resource determined by the lead agency, supported by substantial

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

evidence, to be significant according to the historical register criteria in Public Resources Code section 5024.1(c), and considering the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR included historic and cultural resources study, which included research on whether any listed or eligible sites had been documented in the project area. No such sites were found. However, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to any previously undiscovered resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; project-specific impacts are less than significant. b) Notice of the proposed project was mailed to tribes which had requested such notice pursuant to AB 52.

A request for consultation was not received. As discussed in item a, above, no resources are known to occur in the area. However, standard mitigation measures apply which are designed to reduce impacts to resources, should any be found on-site. The measure requires an immediate cessation of work, and contact with the appropriate agencies to address the resource before work can resume. The project will not result in any new impacts beyond those already discussed and disclosed in the Northeast Roseville Specific Plan EIR; projectspecific impacts are less than significant.

XIX. Utilities and Service Systems
Water and sewer services will be provided by the City of Roseville. The developer will be responsible for extending new lines onto the site in order to serve the project. Storm water will be collected on-site and transferred via the existing storm drain system into an off-site storm drain system. Solid waste will be collected by the City of Roseville’s Refuse Department. The City of Roseville will provide electric service to the site, while natural gas will be provided by PG&E. Comcast will provide cable. The project has been reviewed by the City’s Engineering Division, Environmental Utilities, Roseville Electric and PG&E. Adequate services are available for the project.

Would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Require or result in the
relocation or construction
of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas,
or telecommunications
facilities, the construction
or relocation of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
b) Have sufficient water
supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably
foreseeable future
development during
normal, dry, and multiple
dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination
by the wastewater
treatment provider which
serves the project that it
has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s
projected demand in
addition of the provider’s
existing commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in
excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of
the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise
impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction
goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state,
and local management
and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid
waste?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to utilities and service systems is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–e listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a) The project is consistent with the Specific Plan, and will be required to construct any utilities infrastructure necessary to serve the project, as well as pay fees which fund the operation of the facilities and the construction of major infrastructure. The construction impacts related to building the major infrastructure were disclosed in the EIR for the Specific Plan, and appropriate mitigation was adopted. Minor additional infrastructure will be constructed within the project site to tie the project into the major systems, but these facilities will be constructed in locations where site development is already occurring as part of the overall project; there are no additional substantial impacts specific or particular to the minor infrastructure improvements. b) The City of Roseville 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), adopted May 2016, estimates water demand and supply for the City through the year 2040, based on existing land use designations and population projections. In addition, the General Plan EIR estimates water demand and supply for ultimate General Plan buildout. The project is consistent with existing land use designations, and is therefore consistent with the

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

assumptions of the UWMP and General Plan EIR. The UWMP indicates that existing water supply sources are sufficient to meet all near term needs, estimating an annual water demand of 48,762 acre-feet per year (AFY) by the year 2035 and existing surface and recycled water supplies in the amount of 60,400 AFY in normal years.

The UWMP establishes some water supply deficit during dry year scenarios, but establishes that mandatory water conservation measures and the use of groundwater to offset reductions in surface water supplies are sufficient to offset the deficit. The project, which is consistent with existing land use designations, would not require new or expanded water supply entitlements.
c) The proposed project would be served by the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (DCWWTP). The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulates water quality and quantity of effluent discharged from the City’s wastewater treatment facilities. The DCWWTP has the capacity to treat 18 million gallons per day (mgd) and is currently treatingn8.9 mgd. The project is consistent with existing land use designations, which is how infrastructure capacity is planned. Therefore, the volume of wastewater generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by the facility; the proposed project will not contribute to an exceedance of applicable wastewater treatment requirements. The impact would be less than significant. d, e) The Western Placer Waste Management Authority is the regional agency handling recycling and waste disposal for Roseville and surrounding areas. The regional waste facilities include a Material Recovery Facility (MRF) and the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill (WRSL). Currently, the WRSL is permitted to accept up to 1,900 tons of municipal solid waste per day. According to the solid waste analysis of the General Plan EIR, under current projected development conditions the WRSL has a projected lifespan extending through 2058. There is sufficient existing capacity to serve the proposed project. Though the project will contribute incrementally to an eventual need to find other means of waste disposal, this impact of City buildout has already been disclosed and mitigation applied as part of each Specific Plan the City has approved. All residences and business in the City pay fees for solid waste collection, a portion of which is collected to fund eventual solid waste disposal expansion.

The project will not result in any new impacts associated with major infrastructure. Environmental Utilities staff has reviewed the project for consistency with policies, codes, and regulations related to waste disposal and waste reduction regulations and policies and has found that the project design is in compliance.

XX. Wildfire
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an
adopted emergency
response plan or
emergency evacuation
plan?
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing
winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose
project occupants to
pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources,
power lines or other
utilities) that may
exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the
environment?
X
d) Expose people or
structures to significant
risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage
changes?
X
Thresholds of Significance and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to wildfire is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–d listed above. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is the state agency responsible for wildland fire protection and management. As part of that task, CAL FIRE maintains maps designating Wildland Fire Hazard Severity zones. The City is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area; fire suppression is entirely within local responsibility.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–d) Checklist questions a–d above do not apply, because the project site is not within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and is not in a CAL FIRE responsibility area.

XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance
Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially
reduce the number or
restrict the range of an
X

INITIAL STUDY
April 12, 2022
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 – 12 & 7 Medical Plaza File # PL22-0024 & PL22-0061

Environmental Issue Potentially
Significant Impact
Less Than Significant
With Mitigation
Less Than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
endangered, threatened or
rare species, or eliminate
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have
impacts which are
individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively
considerable” means that
the incremental effects of a
project are considerable
when viewed in connection
with the effects of past
projects, the effects of
other current projects, and
the effects of probable
future projects.)
X
c) Does the project have
environmental effects
which will cause
substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
X
Significance Criteria and Regulatory Setting:

The significance of impacts related to mandatory findings of significance is based directly on the CEQA Guidelines checklist items a–c listed above.

Discussion of Checklist Answers:
a–c) Long term environmental goals are not impacted by the proposed project. The cumulative impacts do not deviate beyond what was contemplated in the Specific Plan EIR, and mitigation measures have already been incorporated via the Specific Plan EIR. With implementation of the City’s Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards and best management practices, mitigation measures described in this chapter, and permit conditions, the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the habitat of any plant or animal species.

Based on the foregoing, the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of any wildlife species, or create adverse effects on human beings.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

In reviewing the site specific information provided for this project and acting as Lead Agency, the City of Roseville, Development Services Department, Planning Division has analyzed the potential environmental impacts created by this project and determined that the impacts are less than significant. As demonstrated in the initial study checklist, there are no “project specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or site” that cannot be reduced to less than significant effects through mitigation (CEQA Section 15183) and therefore an EIR is not required. Therefore, on the basis of the foregoing initial study:

STAFF TO DELETE INAPPLICALBE STATEMENT
[ X ] I find that the proposed project WILL NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared.

Initial Study Prepared by:
____________________________________________
Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
City of Roseville, Development Services – Planning Division Attachments:

1. Visual Analysis

2. Nightview Study

3. CalEEMod Report
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
1 E. Roseville Parkway & N. Sunrise Ave.
1 1
IS/ND ATTACHMENT 1
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 2
Stone Point Drive & N. Sunrise Ave.

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
2 2
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 3

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
E. Roseville Parkway & Secret Ravine Parkway
3 3
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 4
Secret Ravine Parkway & Medical Plaza

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
4 4
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 5

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
5 5
Secret Ravine Parkway North of Medical Plaza
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 6
Secret Ravine Parkway - South

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
6 6
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 7
Interstate 80 & Highway 65

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
7 7
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW
View from the Apartments

LOCATION OF PROPOSED

PARKING GARAGE
8 8
8 LOCATION OF EXISTING

PARKING GARAGE

LOCATION OF
PROPOSED MOB 10
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/04/22
VIEW FROM APTS.
(E) APARTMENT

BUILDING
(E) GARAGE
(E) CARPORT

VIEW CONE FOR SECOND LEVEL

OF (E) APARTMENT BUILDING

PARKING GARAGE
12 EXPANSION

VIEW CONE AT EYE LEVEL FROM
(E) APARTMENT BUILDING
(E) ORNAMENTAL IRON

FENCE AT PROPERTY LINE
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

AAR AAR CCR DDR EER GGR GGR
90'-0" 308'-9 5/8"
398'-9 3/4"
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB
1 E. Roseville Parkway & N. Sunrise Ave.
1 1
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW 2
E. Roseville Parkway & Secret Ravine Parkway

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE 12 EXPANSION IN
FRONT OF MOB 7
2 2
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW 3

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED
PARKING GARAGE 12
Secret Ravine Parkway & Medical Plaza Drive
3 3
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW 4
Secret Ravine Parkway - North

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB
4 4

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED
PARKING GARAGE 12
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW 5

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB
Interstate 80 & Highway 65
5 5
SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB 7 02/25/22
VIEW 6
View from the Apartments

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED MOB
6 6

SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER MOB
7 02/25/21

SITE SECTION
LEVEL 01
+0' - 0"
LEVEL 01
+0'- 0"
LEVEL 02
+15' - 0"
LEVEL 02
+15' - 0"
LEVEL 03
+29' - 3"
LEVEL 03
+29' - 3"

GFEDCBA
LEVEL 04
+43' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+43' - 6"

TOP OF STEEL
+57' - 9"

TOP OF STEEL
+57' - 9"

PARAPET-LOW
+61' - 6"

PARAPET-LOW
+61' - 6"
T.O. SCREEN
+72' - 6"
T.O. SCREEN
+72' - 6"

PARAPET-HIGH
+65' - 9" PARAPET
-HIGH
+65' - 9"
129'-9 1/4"
97'-3 3/4" 30'-4"
MOB7
C.3 B.7
91’-0”
121’-4”
30’-4”

VIEW CONE FOR SECOND

LEVEL OF (E) APARTMENT

BUILDING

VIEW CONE AT EYE LEVEL

FROM (E) APARTMENT

BUILDING
(E) ORNAMENTAL

IRON FENCE AT

PROPERTY LINE
(E) 2 STORY

APARTMENT BUILDING
(E) GARAGE
(E) CARPORT
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 9
4 4

LOCATION OF

PROPOSED GARAGE
Night View at Secret Ravine Parkway & Medical Plaza

LOCATION OF
PROPOSED MOB 7
IS/ND ATTACHMENT 2
SRMC PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION 03/28/22
VIEW 10
10 10
Night View from the Apartments

LOCATION OF PROPOSED

PARKING GARAGE

LOCATION OF EXISTING

PARKING GARAGE

LOCATION OF
PROPOSED MOB 7
Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7
Placer County APCD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage changed based on submitted plans.

Area Mitigation -
Architectural Coating -
Construction Phase - Entire site will be graded and prepped as one phase, but building construction will occur in two phases. Duration of building construction and finishes was extended to account for this.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Medical Office Building 100.00 1000sqft 1.59 100,000.00 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 192.00 1000sqft 0.94 192,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 74

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Roseville Electric
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
471.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 250.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/25/2023 5/2/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2023 5/9/2023
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ATTACHMENT 3

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.30 1.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.41 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.3034 17.2563 18.2050 0.0435 7.1647 0.7427 7.9074 3.4465 0.7000 4.1298 0.0000 4,207.592 2 4,207.592
2 0.7698 0.1818 4,273.500
5 2023 67.7210 24.5396 29.8426 0.0619 1.4425 1.0658 2.4425 0.3900 1.0056 1.3782 0.0000 5,964.253 7 5,964.253
7 1.0014 0.1788 6,042.156
6 Maximum 67.7210 24.5396 29.8426 0.0619 7.1647 1.0658 7.9074 3.4465 1.0056 4.1298 0.0000 5,964.253 7 5,964.253
7 1.0014 0.1818 6,042.156
6 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.3034 17.2563 18.2050 0.0435 7.1647 0.7427 7.9074 3.4465 0.7000 4.1298 0.0000 4,207.592 2 4,207.592
2 0.7698 0.1818 4,273.500
5 2023 67.7210 24.5396 29.8426 0.0619 1.4425 1.0658 2.4425 0.3900 1.0056 1.3782 0.0000 5,964.253 7 5,964.253
7 1.0014 0.1788 6,042.156
6 Maximum 67.7210 24.5396 29.8426 0.0619 7.1647 1.0658 7.9074 3.4465 1.0056 4.1298 0.0000 5,964.253 7 5,964.253
7 1.0014 0.1818 6,042.156
6 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Energy 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mobile 10.6605 10.7131 75.1778 0.1484 14.3949 0.1277 14.5225 3.8422 0.1198 3.9620 15,099.99 63 15,099.99
63 0.9500 0.7871 15,358.29
48 Total 13.1881 11.1512 75.5754 0.1510 14.3949 0.1610 14.5559 3.8422 0.1532 3.9954 15,625.44 29 15,625.44
29 0.9603 0.7967 15,886.86
77 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Energy 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mobile 10.6605 10.7131 75.1778 0.1484 14.3949 0.1277 14.5225 3.8422 0.1198 3.9620 15,099.99 63 15,099.99
63 0.9500 0.7871 15,358.29
48 Total 13.1881 11.1512 75.5754 0.1510 14.3949 0.1610 14.5559 3.8422 0.1532 3.9954 15,625.44 29 15,625.44
29 0.9603 0.7967 15,886.86
77 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/12/2022 5/16/2022 5 3 2 Grading Grading 5/17/2022 5/24/2022 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 5/25/2022 5/9/2023 5 250 4 Paving Paving 3/29/2023 4/11/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/12/2023 5/2/2023 5 15 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 150,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,000; Striped Parking Area: 11,520 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 113.00 48.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0138 0.2192 6.0000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 60.5697 60.5697 1.6200e0031.4900e00361.0558 Total 0.0253 0.0138 0.2192 6.0000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 60.5697 60.5697 1.6200e0031.4900e00361.0558 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0138 0.2192 6.0000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 60.5697 60.5697 1.6200e0031.4900e00361.0558 Total 0.0253 0.0138 0.2192 6.0000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 60.5697 60.5697 1.6200e0031.4900e00361.0558 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0316 0.0173 0.2740 7.5000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 75.7122 75.7122 2.0300e0031.8700e00376.3197 Total 0.0316 0.0173 0.2740 7.5000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 75.7122 75.7122 2.0300e0031.8700e00376.3197 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0316 0.0173 0.2740 7.5000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 75.7122 75.7122 2.0300e0031.8700e00376.3197 Total 0.0316 0.0173 0.2740 7.5000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 75.7122 75.7122 2.0300e0031.8700e00376.3197 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0912 2.4574 0.7559 0.0101 0.3253 0.0236 0.3489 0.0937 0.0226 0.1162 1,062.763 4 1,062.763
4 4.6300e0030.1607 1,110.765
1 Worker 0.3567 0.1949 3.0959 8.4600e0030.9283 4.6800e0030.9330 0.2462 4.3100e0030.2505 855.5476 855.5476 0.0229 0.0211 862.4124 Total 0.4479 2.6523 3.8517 0.0185 1.2535 0.0283 1.2818 0.3399 0.0269 0.3668 1,918.310 9 1,918.310
9 0.0276 0.1818 1,973.177
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0912 2.4574 0.7559 0.0101 0.3253 0.0236 0.3489 0.0937 0.0226 0.1162 1,062.763 4 1,062.763
4 4.6300e0030.1607 1,110.765
1 Worker 0.3567 0.1949 3.0959 8.4600e0030.9283 4.6800e0030.9330 0.2462 4.3100e0030.2505 855.5476 855.5476 0.0229 0.0211 862.4124 Total 0.4479 2.6523 3.8517 0.0185 1.2535 0.0283 1.2818 0.3399 0.0269 0.3668 1,918.310 9 1,918.310
9 0.0276 0.1818 1,973.177
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0571 2.1098 0.6915 9.7200e0030.3253 0.0133 0.3386 0.0937 0.0127 0.1064 1,026.589 4 1,026.589
4 3.0100e0030.1552 1,072.899
7 Worker 0.3314 0.1731 2.8714 8.1900e0030.9283 4.4400e0030.9327 0.2462 4.0900e0030.2503 828.2092 828.2092 0.0208 0.0197 834.5823 Total 0.3885 2.2829 3.5630 0.0179 1.2535 0.0177 1.2713 0.3399 0.0168 0.3567 1,854.798 5 1,854.798
5 0.0238 0.1748 1,907.482
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0571 2.1098 0.6915 9.7200e0030.3253 0.0133 0.3386 0.0937 0.0127 0.1064 1,026.589 4 1,026.589
4 3.0100e0030.1552 1,072.899
7 Worker 0.3314 0.1731 2.8714 8.1900e0030.9283 4.4400e0030.9327 0.2462 4.0900e0030.2503 828.2092 828.2092 0.0208 0.0197 834.5823 Total 0.3885 2.2829 3.5630 0.0179 1.2535 0.0177 1.2713 0.3399 0.0168 0.3567 1,854.798 5 1,854.798
5 0.0238 0.1748 1,907.482
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0440 0.0230 0.3812 1.0900e0030.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 109.9393 109.9393 2.7500e0032.6100e003110.7853 Total 0.0440 0.0230 0.3812 1.0900e0030.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 109.9393 109.9393 2.7500e0032.6100e003110.7853 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0440 0.0230 0.3812 1.0900e0030.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 109.9393 109.9393 2.7500e0032.6100e003110.7853 Total 0.0440 0.0230 0.3812 1.0900e0030.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 109.9393 109.9393 2.7500e0032.6100e003110.7853 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 65.3597 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 65.5513 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0675 0.0352 0.5845 1.6700e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 168.5736 168.5736 4.2200e0034.0000e003169.8707 Total 0.0675 0.0352 0.5845 1.6700e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 168.5736 168.5736 4.2200e0034.0000e003169.8707 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 65.3597 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 65.5513 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0675 0.0352 0.5845 1.6700e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 168.5736 168.5736 4.2200e0034.0000e003169.8707 Total 0.0675 0.0352 0.5845 1.6700e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 168.5736 168.5736 4.2200e0034.0000e003169.8707 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 10.6605 10.7131 75.1778 0.1484 14.3949 0.1277 14.5225 3.8422 0.1198 3.9620 15,099.99 63 15,099.99
63 0.9500 0.7871 15,358.29
48 Unmitigated 10.6605 10.7131 75.1778 0.1484 14.3949 0.1277 14.5225 3.8422 0.1198 3.9620 15,099.99 63 15,099.99
63 0.9500 0.7871 15,358.29
48 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Medical Office Building 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491 Total 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Medical Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 29.60 51.40 19.00 60 30 10

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450 Medical Office Building 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building
4465.75 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Total 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building

4.46575 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Total 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Unmitigated 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7500e0032.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Total 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7500e0032.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Total 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 3:58 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7
Placer County APCD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage changed based on submitted plans.

Area Mitigation -
Architectural Coating -
Construction Phase - Entire site will be graded and prepped as one phase, but building construction will occur in two phases. Duration of building construction and finishes was extended to account for this.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Medical Office Building 100.00 1000sqft 1.59 100,000.00 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 192.00 1000sqft 0.94 192,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 74

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Roseville Electric
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
471.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 250.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/25/2023 5/2/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2023 5/9/2023
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.30 1.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.41 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.2747 17.4814 17.9534 0.0427 7.1647 0.7427 7.9074 3.4465 0.7001 4.1298 0.0000 4,124.147 7 4,124.147
7 0.7701 0.1855 4,191.243
1 2023 67.6891 24.7466 29.5813 0.0610 1.4425 1.0658 2.4426 0.3900 1.0057 1.3783 0.0000 5,873.887 4 5,873.887
4 1.0054 0.1830 5,953.073
8 Maximum 67.6891 24.7466 29.5813 0.0610 7.1647 1.0658 7.9074 3.4465 1.0057 4.1298 0.0000 5,873.887 4 5,873.887
4 1.0054 0.1855 5,953.073
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2022 2.2747 17.4814 17.9534 0.0427 7.1647 0.7427 7.9074 3.4465 0.7001 4.1298 0.0000 4,124.147 7 4,124.147
7 0.7701 0.1855 4,191.243
1 2023 67.6891 24.7466 29.5813 0.0610 1.4425 1.0658 2.4426 0.3900 1.0057 1.3783 0.0000 5,873.887 4 5,873.887
4 1.0054 0.1830 5,953.073
8 Maximum 67.6891 24.7466 29.5813 0.0610 7.1647 1.0658 7.9074 3.4465 1.0057 4.1298 0.0000 5,873.887 4 5,873.887
4 1.0054 0.1855 5,953.073
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Energy 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mobile 8.6021 12.3226 80.5858 0.1380 14.3949 0.1278 14.5227 3.8422 0.1199 3.9621 14,052.81 25 14,052.81
25 1.1285 0.8600 14,337.28
95 Total 11.1297 12.7607 80.9833 0.1407 14.3949 0.1611 14.5560 3.8422 0.1533 3.9955 14,578.25 91 14,578.25
91 1.1387 0.8696 14,865.86
24 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Energy 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mobile 8.6021 12.3226 80.5858 0.1380 14.3949 0.1278 14.5227 3.8422 0.1199 3.9621 14,052.81 25 14,052.81
25 1.1285 0.8600 14,337.28
95 Total 11.1297 12.7607 80.9833 0.1407 14.3949 0.1611 14.5560 3.8422 0.1533 3.9955 14,578.25 91 14,578.25
91 1.1387 0.8696 14,865.86
24 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/12/2022 5/16/2022 5 3 2 Grading Grading 5/17/2022 5/24/2022 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 5/25/2022 5/9/2023 5 250 4 Paving Paving 3/29/2023 4/11/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/12/2023 5/2/2023 5 15 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 150,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,000; Striped Parking Area: 11,520 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 113.00 48.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0235 0.0172 0.1992 5.4000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 54.5749 54.5749 1.9000e0031.7300e00355.1384 Total 0.0235 0.0172 0.1992 5.4000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 54.5749 54.5749 1.9000e0031.7300e00355.1384 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 1.5908 0.0000 1.5908 0.1718 0.0000 0.1718 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 0.5952 0.5952 0.5476 0.5476 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Total 1.3784 15.6673 10.0558 0.0245 1.5908 0.5952 2.1859 0.1718 0.5476 0.7193 0.0000 2,375.156 9 2,375.156
9 0.7682 2,394.361
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0235 0.0172 0.1992 5.4000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 54.5749 54.5749 1.9000e0031.7300e00355.1384 Total 0.0235 0.0172 0.1992 5.4000e0040.0657 3.3000e0040.0661 0.0174 3.1000e0040.0177 54.5749 54.5749 1.9000e0031.7300e00355.1384 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0293 0.0215 0.2490 6.7000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 68.2186 68.2186 2.3800e0032.1600e00368.9230 Total 0.0293 0.0215 0.2490 6.7000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 68.2186 68.2186 2.3800e0032.1600e00368.9230 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 7.0826 0.7423 7.8249 3.4247 0.6829 4.1076 0.0000 1,995.482 5 1,995.482
5 0.6454 2,011.616
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0293 0.0215 0.2490 6.7000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 68.2186 68.2186 2.3800e0032.1600e00368.9230 Total 0.0293 0.0215 0.2490 6.7000e0040.0822 4.1000e0040.0826 0.0218 3.8000e0040.0222 68.2186 68.2186 2.3800e0032.1600e00368.9230 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0878 2.6341 0.7860 0.0101 0.3253 0.0237 0.3490 0.0937 0.0227 0.1163 1,063.996 1 1,063.996
1 4.4800e0030.1610 1,112.089
9 Worker 0.3314 0.2433 2.8142 7.6300e0030.9283 4.6800e0030.9330 0.2462 4.3100e0030.2505 770.8703 770.8703 0.0269 0.0245 778.8302 Total 0.4192 2.8774 3.6001 0.0177 1.2535 0.0284 1.2819 0.3399 0.0270 0.3668 1,834.866 4 1,834.866
4 0.0313 0.1855 1,890.920
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Total 1.8555 14.6040 14.3533 0.0250 0.7022 0.7022 0.6731 0.6731 0.0000 2,289.281 3 2,289.281
3 0.4417 2,300.323
0 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0878 2.6341 0.7860 0.0101 0.3253 0.0237 0.3490 0.0937 0.0227 0.1163 1,063.996 1 1,063.996
1 4.4800e0030.1610 1,112.089
9 Worker 0.3314 0.2433 2.8142 7.6300e0030.9283 4.6800e0030.9330 0.2462 4.3100e0030.2505 770.8703 770.8703 0.0269 0.0245 778.8302 Total 0.4192 2.8774 3.6001 0.0177 1.2535 0.0284 1.2819 0.3399 0.0270 0.3668 1,834.866 4 1,834.866
4 0.0313 0.1855 1,890.920
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0531 2.2683 0.7168 9.7400e0030.3253 0.0134 0.3386 0.0937 0.0128 0.1064 1,028.852 6 1,028.852
6 2.8200e0030.1556 1,075.298
2 Worker 0.3083 0.2160 2.6185 7.3800e0030.9283 4.4400e0030.9327 0.2462 4.0900e0030.2503 746.4347 746.4347 0.0244 0.0227 753.8216 Total 0.3614 2.4842 3.3352 0.0171 1.2535 0.0178 1.2713 0.3399 0.0169 0.3567 1,775.287 3 1,775.287
3 0.0272 0.1784 1,829.119
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Total 1.7136 13.6239 14.2145 0.0250 0.6136 0.6136 0.5880 0.5880 0.0000 2,289.523 3 2,289.523
3 0.4330 2,300.347
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0531 2.2683 0.7168 9.7400e0030.3253 0.0134 0.3386 0.0937 0.0128 0.1064 1,028.852 6 1,028.852
6 2.8200e0030.1556 1,075.298
2 Worker 0.3083 0.2160 2.6185 7.3800e0030.9283 4.4400e0030.9327 0.2462 4.0900e0030.2503 746.4347 746.4347 0.0244 0.0227 753.8216 Total 0.3614 2.4842 3.3352 0.0171 1.2535 0.0178 1.2713 0.3399 0.0169 0.3567 1,775.287 3 1,775.287
3 0.0272 0.1784 1,829.119
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0409 0.0287 0.3476 9.8000e0040.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 99.0843 99.0843 3.2400e0033.0200e003100.0648 Total 0.0409 0.0287 0.3476 9.8000e0040.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 99.0843 99.0843 3.2400e0033.0200e003100.0648 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8802 8.6098 11.6840 0.0179 0.4338 0.4338 0.4003 0.4003 0.0000 1,709.992 6 1,709.992
6 0.5420 1,723.541
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0409 0.0287 0.3476 9.8000e0040.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 99.0843 99.0843 3.2400e0033.0200e003100.0648 Total 0.0409 0.0287 0.3476 9.8000e0040.1232 5.9000e0040.1238 0.0327 5.4000e0040.0332 99.0843 99.0843 3.2400e0033.0200e003100.0648 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 65.3597 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 65.5513 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0628 0.0440 0.5330 1.5000e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 151.9292 151.9292 4.9700e0034.6300e003153.4327 Total 0.0628 0.0440 0.5330 1.5000e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 151.9292 151.9292 4.9700e0034.6300e003153.4327 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 65.3597 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 65.5513 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e0030.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0628 0.0440 0.5330 1.5000e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 151.9292 151.9292 4.9700e0034.6300e003153.4327 Total 0.0628 0.0440 0.5330 1.5000e0030.1889 9.0000e0040.1898 0.0501 8.3000e0040.0510 151.9292 151.9292 4.9700e0034.6300e003153.4327 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 8.6021 12.3226 80.5858 0.1380 14.3949 0.1278 14.5227 3.8422 0.1199 3.9621 14,052.81 25 14,052.81
25 1.1285 0.8600 14,337.28
95 Unmitigated 8.6021 12.3226 80.5858 0.1380 14.3949 0.1278 14.5227 3.8422 0.1199 3.9621 14,052.81 25 14,052.81
25 1.1285 0.8600 14,337.28
95 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Medical Office Building 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491 Total 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Medical Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 29.60 51.40 19.00 60 30 10

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450 Medical Office Building 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building
4465.75 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Total 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building

4.46575 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Total 0.0482 0.4378 0.3678 2.6300e0030.0333 0.0333 0.0333 0.0333 525.3828 525.3828 0.0101 9.6300e003528.5048 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Unmitigated 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7500e0032.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Total 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.2686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

2.2080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 2.7500e0032.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Total 2.4794 2.7000e0040.0298 0.0000 1.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0041.1000e0040.0639 0.0639 1.7000e0040.0681 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 26 Date: 5/12/2022 4:03 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7
Placer County APCD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage changed based on submitted plans.

Area Mitigation -
Architectural Coating -
Construction Phase - Entire site will be graded and prepped as one phase, but building construction will occur in two phases. Duration of building construction and finishes was extended to account for this.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Medical Office Building 100.00 1000sqft 1.59 100,000.00 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 192.00 1000sqft 0.94 192,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 74

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Roseville Electric
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
471.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 15.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 250.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/25/2023 5/2/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/28/2023 5/9/2023
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.30 1.59
tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.41 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1853 1.4496 1.4565 3.4900e0030.1188 0.0608 0.1797 0.0365 0.0582 0.0946 0.0000 305.6644 305.6644 0.0366 0.0132 310.5043 2023 0.5915 0.7909 0.8818 2.0700e0030.0572 0.0318 0.0889 0.0156 0.0304 0.0459 0.0000 181.4449 181.4449 0.0218 7.4100e003184.1976 Maximum 0.5915 1.4496 1.4565 3.4900e0030.1188 0.0608 0.1797 0.0365 0.0582 0.0946 0.0000 305.6644 305.6644 0.0366 0.0132 310.5043 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1853 1.4496 1.4565 3.4900e0030.1188 0.0608 0.1797 0.0365 0.0582 0.0946 0.0000 305.6642 305.6642 0.0366 0.0132 310.5041 2023 0.5915 0.7909 0.8818 2.0700e0030.0572 0.0318 0.0889 0.0156 0.0304 0.0459 0.0000 181.4448 181.4448 0.0218 7.4100e003184.1975 Maximum 0.5915 1.4496 1.4565 3.4900e0030.1188 0.0608 0.1797 0.0365 0.0582 0.0946 0.0000 305.6642 305.6642 0.0366 0.0132 310.5041 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-12-2022 8-11-2022 0.6354 0.6354
2 8-12-2022 11-11-2022 0.6456 0.6456
3 11-12-2022 2-11-2023 0.6255 0.6255
4 2-12-2023 5-11-2023 1.1125 1.1125
Highest 1.1125 1.1125

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Energy 8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 517.3997 517.3997 0.0318 5.2400e003519.7560 Mobile 1.2140 1.6050 10.2859 0.0192 1.8926 0.0175 1.9101 0.5070 0.0165 0.5235 0.0000 1,775.682 6 1,775.682
6 0.1297 0.1030 1,809.604
1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 219.2302 0.0000 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.9809 16.3269 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766 Total 1.6750 1.6850 10.3557 0.0197 1.8926 0.0236 1.9162 0.5070 0.0225 0.5296 223.2112 2,309.414 3 2,532.625
5 13.5277 0.1180 2,905.975
8 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Energy 8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 517.3997 517.3997 0.0318 5.2400e003519.7560 Mobile 1.2140 1.6050 10.2859 0.0192 1.8926 0.0175 1.9101 0.5070 0.0165 0.5235 0.0000 1,775.682 6 1,775.682
6 0.1297 0.1030 1,809.604
1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 219.2302 0.0000 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.9809 16.3269 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766 Total 1.6750 1.6850 10.3557 0.0197 1.8926 0.0236 1.9162 0.5070 0.0225 0.5296 223.2112 2,309.414 3 2,532.625
5 13.5277 0.1180 2,905.975
8 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/12/2022 5/16/2022 5 3 2 Grading Grading 5/17/2022 5/24/2022 5 6
3 Building Construction Building Construction 5/25/2022 5/9/2023 5 250 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 Paving Paving 3/29/2023 4/11/2023 5 10
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 4/12/2023 5/2/2023 5 15 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 150,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,000; Striped Parking Area: 11,520 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 4.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 6
Acres of Paving: 0.94
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e0030.0000 2.3900e0032.6000e0040.0000 2.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.2000e0048.2000e0040.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Total 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0052.3900e0038.9000e0043.2800e0032.6000e0048.2000e0041.0800e0030.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 113.00 48.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0759 0.0759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0766 Total 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0759 0.0759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0766 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.3900e0030.0000 2.3900e0032.6000e0040.0000 2.6000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.2000e0048.2000e0040.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Total 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0052.3900e0038.9000e0043.2800e0032.6000e0048.2000e0041.0800e0030.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0759 0.0759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0766 Total 3.0000e0052.0000e0052.9000e0040.0000 9.0000e0050.0000 9.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0759 0.0759 0.0000 0.0000 0.0766 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0052.2300e0032.2300e0032.0500e0032.0500e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Total 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0050.0213 2.2300e0030.0235 0.0103 2.0500e0030.0123 0.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0056.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1898 0.1898 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1916 Total 8.0000e0056.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1898 0.1898 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1916 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0213 0.0000 0.0213 0.0103 0.0000 0.0103 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0052.2300e0032.2300e0032.0500e0032.0500e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Total 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0050.0213 2.2300e0030.0235 0.0103 2.0500e0030.0123 0.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.0000e0056.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1898 0.1898 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1916 Total 8.0000e0056.0000e0057.3000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1898 0.1898 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1916 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1466 1.1537 1.1339 1.9800e0030.0555 0.0555 0.0532 0.0532 0.0000 164.0673 164.0673 0.0317 0.0000 164.8586 Total 0.1466 1.1537 1.1339 1.9800e0030.0555 0.0555 0.0532 0.0532 0.0000 164.0673 164.0673 0.0317 0.0000 164.8586 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.0700e0030.2039 0.0608 8.0000e0040.0248 1.8700e0030.0266 7.1700e0031.7900e0038.9600e0030.0000 76.2027 76.2027 3.3000e0040.0115 79.6462 Worker 0.0248 0.0174 0.2180 6.2000e0040.0701 3.7000e0040.0705 0.0187 3.4000e0040.0190 0.0000 56.4659 56.4659 1.7800e0031.6400e00356.9984 Total 0.0319 0.2214 0.2788 1.4200e0030.0949 2.2400e0030.0971 0.0258 2.1300e0030.0280 0.0000 132.6686 132.6686 2.1100e0030.0132 136.6446 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1466 1.1537 1.1339 1.9800e0030.0555 0.0555 0.0532 0.0532 0.0000 164.0671 164.0671 0.0317 0.0000 164.8584 Total 0.1466 1.1537 1.1339 1.9800e0030.0555 0.0555 0.0532 0.0532 0.0000 164.0671 164.0671 0.0317 0.0000 164.8584 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.0700e0030.2039 0.0608 8.0000e0040.0248 1.8700e0030.0266 7.1700e0031.7900e0038.9600e0030.0000 76.2027 76.2027 3.3000e0040.0115 79.6462 Worker 0.0248 0.0174 0.2180 6.2000e0040.0701 3.7000e0040.0705 0.0187 3.4000e0040.0190 0.0000 56.4659 56.4659 1.7800e0031.6400e00356.9984 Total 0.0319 0.2214 0.2788 1.4200e0030.0949 2.2400e0030.0971 0.0258 2.1300e0030.0280 0.0000 132.6686 132.6686 2.1100e0030.0132 136.6446 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0788 0.6267 0.6539 1.1500e0030.0282 0.0282 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 95.5430 95.5430 0.0181 0.0000 95.9947 Total 0.0788 0.6267 0.6539 1.1500e0030.0282 0.0282 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 95.5430 95.5430 0.0181 0.0000 95.9947 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.5400e0030.1020 0.0323 4.5000e0040.0144 6.1000e0040.0150 4.1800e0035.9000e0044.7600e0030.0000 42.8797 42.8797 1.2000e0046.4800e00344.8149 Worker 0.0134 8.9900e0030.1179 3.5000e0040.0408 2.0000e0040.0410 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 0.0000 31.8351 31.8351 9.4000e0048.9000e00432.1228 Total 0.0160 0.1110 0.1503 8.0000e0040.0552 8.1000e0040.0561 0.0150 7.8000e0040.0158 0.0000 74.7148 74.7148 1.0600e0037.3700e00376.9378 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0788 0.6267 0.6539 1.1500e0030.0282 0.0282 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 95.5428 95.5428 0.0181 0.0000 95.9946 Total 0.0788 0.6267 0.6539 1.1500e0030.0282 0.0282 0.0271 0.0271 0.0000 95.5428 95.5428 0.0181 0.0000 95.9946 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.5400e0030.1020 0.0323 4.5000e0040.0144 6.1000e0040.0150 4.1800e0035.9000e0044.7600e0030.0000 42.8797 42.8797 1.2000e0046.4800e00344.8149 Worker 0.0134 8.9900e0030.1179 3.5000e0040.0408 2.0000e0040.0410 0.0109 1.9000e0040.0111 0.0000 31.8351 31.8351 9.4000e0048.9000e00432.1228 Total 0.0160 0.1110 0.1503 8.0000e0040.0552 8.1000e0040.0561 0.0150 7.8000e0040.0158 0.0000 74.7148 74.7148 1.0600e0037.3700e00376.9378 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e0041.3000e0041.7000e0031.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 5.9000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4593 0.4593 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4635 Total 1.9000e0041.3000e0041.7000e0031.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 5.9000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4593 0.4593 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4635 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.5 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e0041.3000e0041.7000e0031.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 5.9000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4593 0.4593 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4635 Total 1.9000e0041.3000e0041.7000e0031.0000e0055.9000e0040.0000 5.9000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4593 0.4593 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4635 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4902 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4400e0039.7700e0030.0136 2.0000e0055.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0040.0000 1.9149 1.9149 1.1000e0040.0000 1.9178 Total 0.4916 9.7700e0030.0136 2.0000e0055.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0040.0000 1.9149 1.9149 1.1000e0040.0000 1.9178 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e0043.0000e0043.9100e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3600e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.0565 1.0565 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0660 Total 4.5000e0043.0000e0043.9100e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3600e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.0565 1.0565 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0660 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.4902 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4400e0039.7700e0030.0136 2.0000e0055.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0040.0000 1.9149 1.9149 1.1000e0040.0000 1.9178 Total 0.4916 9.7700e0030.0136 2.0000e0055.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0045.3000e0040.0000 1.9149 1.9149 1.1000e0040.0000 1.9178 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.5000e0043.0000e0043.9100e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3600e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.0565 1.0565 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0660 Total 4.5000e0043.0000e0043.9100e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3600e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.0565 1.0565 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.0660 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.2140 1.6050 10.2859 0.0192 1.8926 0.0175 1.9101 0.5070 0.0165 0.5235 0.0000 1,775.682 6 1,775.682
6 0.1297 0.1030 1,809.604
1 Unmitigated 1.2140 1.6050 10.2859 0.0192 1.8926 0.0175 1.9101 0.5070 0.0165 0.5235 0.0000 1,775.682 6 1,775.682
6 0.1297 0.1030 1,809.604
1 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
Medical Office Building 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491 Total 3,480.00 857.00 142.00 5,144,491 5,144,491
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Medical Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 29.60 51.40 19.00 60 30 10

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450 Medical Office Building 0.466187 0.061512 0.210180 0.153350 0.034639 0.008391 0.014417 0.011935 0.000556 0.000412 0.031993 0.000977 0.005450

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 430.4167 430.4167 0.0301 3.6500e003432.2561 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 430.4167 430.4167 0.0301 3.6500e003432.2561 NaturalGas
Mitigated

8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building

1.63e
+006

8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999 Total 8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Medical Office
Building

1.63e
+006

8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999 Total 8.7900e0030.0799 0.0671 4.8000e0046.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0036.0700e0030.0000 86.9830 86.9830 1.6700e0031.5900e00387.4999 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.04448e
+006
223.6091 0.0156 1.9000e003224.5647
Medical Office
Building
966000 206.8076 0.0145 1.7500e003207.6914
Total 430.4167 0.0301 3.6500e003432.2561
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.04448e
+006
223.6091 0.0156 1.9000e003224.5647
Medical Office
Building
966000 206.8076 0.0145 1.7500e003207.6914
Total 430.4167 0.0301 3.6500e003432.2561
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Unmitigated 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0490 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4030 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.5000e0042.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Total 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0490 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.4030 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.5000e0042.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Total 0.4522 2.0000e0052.6800e0030.0000 1.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 5.2200e0035.2200e0031.0000e0050.0000 5.5600e003 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766
Unmitigated 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Medical Office
Building

12.5481 /

2.39011

20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766
Total 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Medical Office
Building

12.5481 /

2.39011

20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766
Total 20.3078 0.4100 9.7900e00333.4766
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Unmitigated 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Medical Office
Building
1080 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Total 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Medical Office
Building
1080 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Total 219.2302 12.9561 0.0000 543.1336
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 5/12/2022 4:02 PM Sutter Parking Garage Expansion & MOB 7 - Placer County APCD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied PROJECT LOCATION: 12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

EXPANSION OF EXISTING PARKING GARAGE ON AN EXISTING MEDICAL CENTER CAMPUS.

EXISTING GARAGE IS 5 LEVELS AND THE PROPOSED EXPANSION WILL BE 6 LEVELS. THE

GARAGE WILL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EAST OF THE EXISTING GARAGE AND DIRECTLY NORTH OF AN EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING. THE EXPANSION WILL HAVE

ONE ADDITIONAL ENTRY INTO THE GARAGE AT THE EAST WHILE STILL UTILIZING THE EXISTING GARAGE ENTRIES FROM THE NORTH AND WEST. SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK AS WELL AS MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL UTILITIES.

TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE IIB
OCCUPANCY: 'S-2' OCCUPANCY, WITH ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN CBC SECTION 406
BUILDING AREA: EXISTING NEW EXPANSION TOTAL
LEVEL 01 33,295 SF 33,031 SF 66,326 SF
LEVEL 02 34,245 SF 32,640 SF 66,885 SF
LEVEL 03 34,245 SF 33,035 SF 67,280 SF
LEVEL 04 34,245 SF 33,035 SF 67,280 SF
LEVEL 05 31,498 SF 28,196 SF 59,694 SF
LEVEL 06 - 32,020 SF 32,020 SF
TOTAL 167,528 SF 191,957 SF 359,485 SF
ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING CODES:
2019 CBC CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS 2019 CEC CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS 2019 CMC CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2019 CPC CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
2019 CFC CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDMENTS 2019 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
2019 NFPA 13 STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 2020 NFPA 25 CALIFORNIA EDITION - STANDARD OF WATER BASED FIRE

PROTECTION SYSTEMS
2019 NFPA 72 NATIONAL FIRE ALARM SIGNALING CODE, AS AMENDED BY

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CFC SECTION 503 FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD:

PER CFC 503.1.1, EXCEPTION 1, THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO INCREASE THE DIMENSION OF 150 FEET WHERE THE BUILDING IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN

APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.1.1, 903.3.1.2, OR 903.3.1.3.

PROJECT SUMMARY
LEVEL
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 05
LEVEL 06
TOTAL

VEHICLE PARKING CALCULATIONS

EXISTING GARAGE
97 94
96 100
90 -
477

EXPANSION
89 96
101
101
80 84
551
TOTAL
186
190
197
201
170
84 1,028

TOTAL PARKING COUNT

PARKING COUNT - BY STALL TYPE
LEVEL
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 05
LEVEL 06
TOTAL

STANDARD
11 52
52 51
39 47
252

COMPACT
13 12
43 43
34 37
182

ACCESSIBLE
20 4
6 6
6 0
42 CLEAN AIR/

CARPOOL/EV
34 28
0 1
1 0
64 ACCESSIBLE STALL COUNT - BY STALL TYPE
LEVEL
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 05
TOTAL

STANDARD
43 59
57 56
53 268

COMPACT
51 35
39 43
34 202

ACCESSIBLE
2 0
0 1
3 6

CLEAN AIR/

CARPOOL/EV
1 0
0 0
0 1

CLEAN AIR
0 0
0 0
0 0

EXISTING GARAGE

EXISTING SURFACE LOT -TO BE REMOVED
LEVEL
LEVEL 01

STANDARD
41 COMPACT
29 ACCESSIBLE
22 CLEAN AIR/

CARPOOL/EV
1 CLEAN AIR
0 TOTAL
93 EXPANSION

CLEAN AIR
11 0
0 0
0 0
11 LEVEL
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 05
TOTAL

STANDARD
0 0
0 1
2 5
VAN
1 0
0 0
1 2

EV - AMBULATORY
0 0
0 0
0 0

EV - STANDARD
1 0
0 0
0 1

EV - VAN
0 0
0 0
0 0
LEVEL
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 05
LEVEL 06
TOTAL

STANDARD
17 3
5 6
7 0
38 VAN
3 1
1 1
2 0
9 EV - AMBULATORY
2 0
0 1
1 0
4 EV - STANDARD
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 EV - VAN
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 EXPANSION

EXISTING GARAGE

PARKING STALLS PROVIDED IN THE GARAGE
• PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION COUNT =
• SURFACE STALLS LOST TO GARAGE EXPANSION =
• SURFACE STALLS DISPLACED BY MOB 10 =
• EXISTING GARAGE STALLS DISPLACED BY EXPANSION =
• NET GAIN OF PARKING STALLS =

PARKING STALLS NEEDED IN THE GARAGE
[PER 2022 FEHR & PEERS TRAFFIC STUDY - 3.31 SPACES PER 1000 SF] • TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED FOR MOB 10 (100,000 SF) =
• TOTAL SURFACE STALLS PROVIDED AT MOB 10 (PHASE 2) =
• TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED IN PARKING GARAGE EXPANSION =

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE

5.106.4 BICYCLE PARKING
PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AT GARAGE EXPANSION: 463
PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR MOB 10: 332
463 - 332 = 131 PARKING SPACES NOT NEEDED FOR MOB 10
SHORT-TERM: 5% OF PARKING SPACES WITHIN 200 FEET OF VISITORS' ENTRANCE, READILY VISIBLE TO PASSERS-BY, WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TWO-BIKE CAPACITY RACK. 5% OF 332 = 17 SHORT-TERM BICYCLE SPACES AT MOB 10
5% OF 131 = 7 SHORT-TERM BICYCLE SPACES AT PARKING GARAGE LONG-TERM: 5% OF PARKING SPACES WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE BICYCLE PARKING FACILITY. 5% OF 463 = 24 LONG-TERM BICYCLE SPACES AT PARKING GARAGE.

BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS
332
- 8
324
551
- 93
- 90
- 14
345

GRID LINE TYPICAL

WORK POINT, CONTROL POINT OR DATUM POINT

ROOM NAME

ROOM NUMBER

KEYNOTE TAG - CSI PREFIX

SEE NOTES ON SIDE OF SHEET

DEMOLITION KEYNOTE TAG

SEE NOTES ON SIDE OF SHEET

DOOR TAG

SEE DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET

WINDOW TAG

SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE SHEET

ACCESSORIES DESIGNATION

SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE SHEET

MILLWORK TYPE TAG

FINISH MATERIAL TAG

FINISH MATERIAL TAG (CEILING)

FINISH MATERIAL TAG (FLOOR)

SIGNAGE TYPE TAG

WALL TYPE TAG

SEE DETAILS

REVISION TAG

DETAIL TAG

SEE SHEET INDICATED

INTERIOR ELEVATION TAG

SEE SHEET INDICATED

SECTION CUT/EXTERIOR ELEVATION TAG

SEE SHEET INDICATED
0 S1
XX XX
ROOM
NAME
101
X
X101
222
XX" XX" XX"

WI NUMBER
HEIGHT
DEPTH
WIDTH
SIGN NO.

SIGN TYPE
1 A101
4 A5.01 2
1 3
REFERENCE NO.

SHEET NO.

REFERENCE NO.

SHEET NO.
1 A5.01
REFERENCE NO.

SHEET NO.

A30A
03 10 01
D001

EQUIPMENT DESIGNATION

SEE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE SHEET
PT-1
ACT-1
CPT-1
XX-1
RTH-1

SYMBOLS

DEVELOPER

ARCHITECTURAL

SEPAROVICH/DOMICH
3321 POWER INN ROAD, STE 100
SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
TELEPHONE: 916 736-9000
FACSIMILE: 916 736-6979
CONTACT: DAVID PADGHAM

DREYFUSS & BLACKFORD ARCHITECTS
3540 FOLSOM BOULEVARD
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95816
TELEPHONE: 916 453-1234
FACSIMILE: 916 453-1236
CONTACT: TONY AMATO

CONTRACTOR

CIVIL/LANDSCAPE

SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING
3244 BROOKSIDE ROAD, SUITE 100
STOCKTON, CA 95219
TELEPHONE: 209 943-2021
FACSIMILE: 209 942-0214

WESTFORK CONSTRUCTION
6050 WAREHOUSE WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95826
TELEPHONE: 916 452-8197
FACSIMILE: 916 452-8190

PROJECT TEAM

STRUCTURAL/PARKING

BUEHLER ENGINEERING
600 Q STREET, SUITE #200
SACRAMENTO, CA 95811
TELEPHONE: 916 443-0303

ELECTRICAL
VASKO ELECTRIC INC.
4300 ASTORIA STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95838
TELEPHONE: 916 568-7700
FACSIMILE: 916 568-7713

PROJECT SITE

VICINITY MAP
NORTH
City of Roseville Approval

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:27:39 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG0.00

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

COVER SHEET
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

ABBREVIATIONS
SMS. SHEET METAL SCREW
SPEC. SPECIFICATION
SQ. SQUARE
STA. STATION
STD. STANDARD
STL. STEEL
STOR. STORAGE
STRUC. STRUCTURAL
SUSP. SUSPENDED
SYM. SYMMETRICAL
T. TREAD
T.&B. TOP AND BOTTOM
T.&G. TONGUE AND GROOVE
T.C. TOP OF CURB
T.O. TOP OF
T.O.F. TOP OF FRAMING
T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL
T.S. TUBE STEEL
T.V. TELEVISION
T.W. TOP OF WALL
TEL. TELEPHONE
TER. TERAZZO
THK. THICK
TYP. TYPICAL
U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
UR. URINAL
VCT. VINYL COMPOSITION TILE
VERT. VERTICAL
VEST. VESTIBULE

VF VENDOR FURNISHED

VI VENDOR INSTALLED
W. WEST
W.C. WATER CLOSET

W/ WITH

W/O WITHOUT
WD. WOOD
WP. WATERPROOF/WORK POINT
WSCT. WAINSCOT
WT. WEIGHT
XFMR. TRANSFORMER
MTL. METAL
MUL. MULLION
N. NORTH
N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE
NO. NUMBER
NOM. NOMINAL
O.A. OVERALL
O.C. ON CENTER
O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER/DIMENSION
O.H. OVERHEAD

O/ OVER
OFF. OFFICE
OPNG. OPENING
OPP. OPPOSITE
P.C. PRECAST
P.I.V. POST INDICATOR VALVE
P.M. PRESSED METAL
P.O.C. POINT OF CONNECTION
P.T. PRESSURE TREATED
PL. PLATE
PLAS. PLASTER/PLASTIC
PLYWD. PLYWOOD
PR. PAIR
PT. POINT
PTN. PARTITION
Q.T. QUARRY TILE
R. RISER/RADIUS
R.D. ROOF DRAIN
R.O. ROUGH OPENING
R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER
REF. REFRIGERATOR
REG. REGISTER
REINF. REINFORCED
REQD. REQUIRED
RESIL. RESILIENT
RM. ROOM
RWD. REDWOOD
S. SOUTH
S.C. SOLID CORE
S.S. STAINLESS STEEL
S.V. SHEET VINYL
SCHED. SCHEDULE
SECT. SECTION
SH. SHELF
SHT. SHEET
SHWR. SHOWER
SIM. SIMILAR
SMH. SEWER MANHOLE
FLUOR. FLUORESCENT
FPRF. FIREPROOF
FT. FOOT/FEET
FTG. FOOTING
FURR. FURRING
FUT. FUTURE
G.B. GRAB BAR/GRADE BREAK
G.F.R.G. GLASS FIBER REINFORCED
GYPSUM
G.I. GALVANIZED IRON
GA. GAUGE
GALV. GALVANIZED
GL. GLASS
GND. GROUND
GR. GRADE
GYP. GYPSUM
H.B. HOSE BIBB
H.C. HOLLOW CORE/ACCESSIBLE

CURB RAMP
H.G. HARDWARE GROUP
H.M. HOLLOW METAL
HDWD. HARDWOOD
HDWE. HARDWARE
HORIZ. HORIZONTAL
HR. HOUR
HSS. HOLLOW STEEL SECTION
HT. HEIGHT
I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER/DIMENSION
I.D.F. INTERMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION

FACILITY
INSUL. INSULATION
INT. INTERIOR
JAN. JANITOR
JT. JOINT
KIT. KITCHEN
LAB. LABORATORY
LAM. LAMINATE
LAV. LAVATORY
LKR. LOCKER
LT. LIGHT
M.C. MEDICINE CABINET
M.O. MASONRY OPENING
MAX. MAXIMUM
MDF. MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD
MECH. MECHANICAL
MEMB. MEMBRANE
MFR. MANUFACTURER
MH. MANHOLE
MIN. MINIMUM
MIRR. MIRROR
MISC. MISCELLANEOUS
MTD. MOUNTED
CPT. CARPET
CTSK. COUNTERSINK
D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN
D.O. DOOR OPENING
D.S.P. DRY STANDPIPE
DBL. DOUBLE
DEPT. DEPARTMENT
DET. DETAIL
DIA. DIAMETER
DIM. DIMENSION
DISP. DISPENSER
DN. DOWN
DR. DOOR
DS. DOWNSPOUT
DWG. DRAWING
DWR. DRAWER
E. EACH
E.J. EXPANSION JOINT
E.P. ELECTRICAL PANELBOARD
E.W.C. ELECTRIC WATER COOLER
EA. EACH
EL. ELEVATION
ELEC. ELECTRICAL
ELEV. ELEVATION
EMER. EMERGENCY
ENCL. ENCLOSURE
EQ. EQUAL
EQUIP. EQUIPMENT
EXIST. EXISTING
EXP. EXPANSION
EXT. EXTERIOR
F.A. FIRE ALARM
F.A.A.N. FIRE ALARM REMOTE

ANNUNCIATOR
F.B. FLAT BAR
F.D. FLOOR DRAIN
F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER
F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
F.F. FINISH FLOOR
F.F.E. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION
F.H. FIRE HYDRANT
F.H.V.C. FIRE HOSE VALVE CABINET
F.O. FACE OF
F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE/CURB
F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH
F.O.M. FACE OF MASONRY
F.O.S. FACE OF STUDS
F.R.T. FIRE RETARDANT TREATED
F.S. FULL SIZE
FDN. FOUNDATION
FIN. FINISH
FL. FLOW LINE
FLASH. FLASHING
FLR. FLOOR
# POUND/NUMBER
& AND
(E) EXISTING
(N) NEW
< ANGLE
@ AT

C/L CENTERLINE

P/L PLATE/PROPERTY LINE
ø/DIA. DIAMETER/ROUND
A.B. AGGREGATE BASE
A.C. ASHPHALT CONCRETE
A.D. AREA DRAIN
A.F.F. ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
ACOUS. ACOUSTICAL
ADJ. ADJUSTABLE
AHU. AIR HANDLING UNIT
ALUM. ALUMINUM
APPROX. APPROXIMATE
ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL
ASB. ASBESTOS
AUTO. AUTOMATIC
B.D.F. BUILDING DISTRIBUTION

FACILITY
B.F.P. BACK FLOW PREVENTER
BD. BOARD
BIT. BITUMINOUS
BLDG. BUILDING
BLK. BLOCK
BLKG. BLOCKING
BM. BEAM
BTM. BOTTOM
BW. BACK OF WALK
C.B. CATCH BASIN
C.G. CORNER GUARD
C.I. CAST IRON
C.I.D. CLEAR INSIDE DIMENSION
C.J. CONTROL JOINT
C.L. CENTERLINE
C.M.U. CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT
C.O. CASED OPENING/CLEAN OUT

C/L CENTERLINE
CAB. CABINET
CEM. CEMENT
CER. CERAMIC
CLG. CEILING
CLKG. CAULKING
CLO. CLOSET
CLR. CLEAR
CNTR. COUNTER
COL. COLUMN
CONC. CONCRETE
CONN. CONNECTION
CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION
CONT. CONTINUOUS
COORD. COORDINATE
CORR. CORRIDOR

GENERAL
PG0.00 COVER SHEET
CIVIL
CG1.01 GENERAL NOTES
CG2.01 TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN
CG3.01 PAVING & DIMENSIONING PLAN
CG4.01 GRADING PLAN
CG5.01 UTILITY PLAN
CG5.02 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN
CG5.03 UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT
CG6.01 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN
CG7.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN

LANDSCAPE
LG1.01 IRRIGATION PLAN
LG2.01 PLANTING PLAN
LG4.01 LANDSCAPE DETAILS

ARCHITECTURAL
PG1.10 OVERALL SITE PLAN
PG1.20 ENLARGED SITE PLAN
PG2.11 LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN
PG2.21 LEVEL 02 FLOOR PLAN
PG2.31 LEVEL 03 FLOOR PLAN
PG2.41 LEVEL 04 FLOOR PLAN
PG2.51 LEVEL 05 FLOOR PLAN
PG2.61 LEVEL 06 FLOOR PLAN
PG3.10 BUILDING SECTIONS

ELECTRICAL
E3.60 LEVEL 06 ELECTRICAL PLAN
E4.40 LEVEL 06 PHOTOMETRICS

SHEET INDEX
CG1.01 GENERAL NOTES ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION @ABABS ACBCR BOBOC BOW C & G C,G, & SW CL CBCJ COCOR DIA DIP DWG EBOW ECR ELEGEPESMT EX. FLFHFOC FT. GGBHPIDIN. LFLHLPLTLTS MAX MHMIN NO. NRCP NTS ODPPCPCC POT PPPRC PTPUE PVC PLRR/WRCRCP RPRTSDSSSLSWSDMH SHT SSMH STA STD TCTOW THRU TI TYP VERT WWP (W) (E) (S) (N) ± ATAGGREGATE BASE ACRYLONITRILE-BUTADIENE-STYRENE ASPHALT CONCRETE BEGINNING OF CURB RETURN BLOWOFF BACK OF CURB BACK OF WALK CURB AND GUTTER CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK CENTERLINE CATCH BASIN CONSTRUCTION JOINT CLEANOUT CITY OF ROSEVILLE DIAMETER DUCTILE IRON PIPE DRAWING EXISTING BACK OF WALK END OF CURB RETURN ELEVATION EXISTING GROUND EDGE OF PAVEMENT, EXISTING PAVEMENT EASEMENT EXISTING FLOWLINE FIRE HYDRANT FACE OF CURB FEET GROUND GRADE BREAK HIGH POINT INSIDE DIAMETER INCH LINEAL FEET LAMP HOLE LOW POINT LEFT LIME TREATED SUB-BASE MAXIMUM MAINTENANCE HOLE MINIMUM NUMBER NON-REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE NOT TO SCALE OUTSIDE DIAMETER PAVEMENT POINT OF CURVATURE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE POINT OF TANGENCY POWER POLE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE POINT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PROPERTY LINE RADIAL OR RADIUS RIGHT-OF-WAY ROLL-CURB REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RADIUS POINT RIGHT STORM DRAIN SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHT SIDEWALK STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE HOLE SHEET SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE HOLE STATION STANDARD TOP OF CURB TOP OF WALL THROUGH TRAFFIC INDEX TYPICAL VERTICAL WATER WEAKENED PLANE WEST EAST SOUTH NORTH PLUS OR MINUS TRUNCATED DOMES PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN DETAILS EXISTING PROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS, LATEST EDITION, AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERE TO-DATE. 2. FOR ELEVATIONS REFER TO BENCHMARK REFERENCED ON SHEET C2.01. 3. PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIAR WITH THE CURRENT CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARDS AND ALL UPDATES AND REVISIONS MADE TO ANY OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD DETAILS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIAR WITH THE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR OTHER STANDARD DETAILS NOT SHOWN BUT WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE "CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANS". 4. DRAWING NUMBERS SHOWN ON THE PLANS REFER TO CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD PLANS, SHOWN THUS: C.O.R. DETAIL NO. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO REMAIN. SUCH IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPLACED AT HIS EXPENSE. 6. ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 7. EXCAVATION OF 5 FEET OR MORE IN DEPTH WILL REQUIRE AN EXCAVATION PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH, EXCAVATE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL EXISTING CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER OR SIDEWALK, ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING, AND DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT THE CONTRACT WORK. ALL SUCH EXCESS MATERIAL GENERATED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR ANY WORK DONE WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, AND NOTIFY THE CITY 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING ANY WORK TO BE ACCEPTED FOR OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. 10. EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS THEY ARE BELIEVED TO EXIST. THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER DO NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE EACH UTILITY COMPANY ACCURATELY LOCATE IN THE FIELD THEIR MAINS AND SERVICE LINES. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 11. ATTENTION IS CALLED TO: SECTION 1540 (A) (1) OF THE CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS (TITLE 8 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION CODE SECTION 1540), ISSUED BY THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS BOARD PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1973, AS AMENDED, WHICH STATES: "PRIOR TO OPENING AN EXCAVATION, EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO DETERMINE WHETHER UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION I.E., SEWER, WATER, FUEL, ELECTRIC LINES, ETC., WILL BE ENCOUNTERED AND, IF SO, WHERE SUCH UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS ARE LOCATED. WHEN THE EXCAVATION APPROACHES THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SUCH AN INSTALLATION, THE EXACT LOCATION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY CAREFUL PROBING OR HAND DIGGING AND WHEN IT IS UNCOVERED, ADEQUATE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING INSTALLATION. ALL KNOWN OWNERS OF UNDERGROUND FACILITIES IN THE AREA CONCERNED SHALL BE ADVISED OF PROPOSED WORK AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF ACTUAL EXCAVATION." 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE CONTRACTOR'S INTENT TO CONNECT TO PUBLIC UTILITIES TO COORDINATE THE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC WATER, SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. 13. PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK, IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO HAVE EACH UTILITY COMPANY LOCATE IN THE FIELD THEIR MAIN SERVICE LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY MEMBERS OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK BY CALLING THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER (800-227-2600). 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS. IT SHALL BE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SO THAT NO DAMAGE RESULTS TO THEM DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO COOPERATE WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES INSTALLING NEW STRUCTURES, UTILITIES AND SERVICES TO THE DEVELOPMENT. 15. WHENEVER EXISTING PAVEMENT IS BROKEN OR CUT DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE WORK COVERED BY THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH PAVEMENT MATERIALS EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE MATERIALS USED IN THE ORIGINAL PAVING. THE FINISHED PAVEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER IF LOCATED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 16. PAYMENT FOR PAVEMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THE AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. REPLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT WHICH IS BROKEN OR CUT IN THE INSTALLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS COVERED BY THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND WHICH LIES OUTSIDE OF SAID AREAS, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE STREET CONTRACTOR'S UNIT PRICE FOR PAVEMENT, AND NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FOR SUCH WORK. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE EXISTING STORM DRAINS, WATER MAINS, AND SANITARY SEWERS WHERE CONNECTIONS AND CROSSINGS ARE TO BE MADE SO EXISTING FLOWLINES AND LOCATIONS CAN BE VERIFIED BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 18. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY, THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. 19. CONSTRUCTION STAKING: CONSTRUCTION STAKING IS NORMALLY PERFORMED BY THE ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE PLAN. THIS PERMITS APPROPRIATE ON-SITE INTERPRETATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF THE PLANS, IF NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO THE ACTUAL NEED FOR STAKING. ANY STAKING REQUESTED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS SUBCONTRACTORS WHICH EXTENDS BEYOND THE ORIGINAL SCOPE OF WORK DEFINED IN THESE PLANS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO AN EXTRA WORK CHARGE TO THE CONTRACTOR. THIS NOTE GIVES FORMAL NOTICE THAT THE FIRM OF SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. CANNOT, AND WILL NOT, TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, IF ANY, WHICH MIGHT OCCUR AND WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED OR DETECTED AND/OR CORRECTED OR MITIGATED HAD SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING, INC. PERFORMED THE CONTRACT STAKING WORK. 20. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FOR USE OF WATER FROM FIRE HYDRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. THE PERMIT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 21. THE PROPERTY OWNERS, DEVELOPERS, AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STORM WATER PERMIT AND STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD ORDER NUMBER 99-08-DWQ COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY PER THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE'S GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PERMITS AND LICENSES REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AND A GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY. 23. DUST CONTROL SHALL BE PERFORMED AT ALL TIMES, AT THE CONTRACTORS' EXPENSE, TO MINIMIZE ANY DUST NUISANCE AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10 OF CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL OPERATE AND MAINTAIN ALL MACHINERY, APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENT TO MAINTAIN ALL EXCAVATIONS FREE FROM WATER DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL DEWATER AND DISPOSE OF THE WATER SO AS TO NOT CAUSE INJURY TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY, OR TO CAUSE A NUISANCE OR MENACE TO THE PUBLIC. THE DEWATERING SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND OPERATED SO THE GROUNDWATER LEVEL OUTSIDE THE EXCAVATION IS NOT REDUCED TO THE EXTENT WHICH WOULD CAUSE DAMAGE OR ENDANGER ADJACENT STRUCTURES OR PROPERTY. ALL COSTS FOR DEWATERING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICE BID FOR ALL PIPE CONSTRUCTION. THE STATIC WATER LEVEL SHALL BE DRAWN DOWN A MINIMUM OF 1 FOOT BELOW THE BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION OF ANY FILL TO THE SPECIFIED DENSITY. DISPOSAL OF WATER SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SWPPP AND SHALL NOT DAMAGE PROPERTY, CREATE A PUBLIC NUISANCE OR VIOLATE THE LAW. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ON HAND, PUMPING EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY IN GOOD WORKING CONDITION FOR EMERGENCIES AND SHALL HAVE WORKMEN AVAILABLE FOR ITS OPERATION. THE DEWATERING SYSTEM SHALL OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY UNTIL BACK-FILL HAS BEEN COMPLETED TO 1 FOOT ABOVE THE NORMAL STATIC GROUNDWATER LEVEL. 25. SITE PREPARATION SHALL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND REMOVAL OF ALL VEGETATION AND ANY DEBRIS FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS. THE DEPTH OF STRIPPING ONSITE SHALL BE EVALUATED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. 26. ANY VOIDS LEFT BY THE REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR OTHER BURIED OBJECTS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ALL LOOSE SOILS AND SHALL BE PROPERLY BACKFILLED WITH ENGINEERED FILLED THAT THE OWNER'S SOIL ENGINEER APPROVES, MONITORS, TESTS, AND APPROVES. 27. THE SUBGRADE SOILS BENEATH ALL PAVING AREAS SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF THE DRY DENSITY WHICH THE OWNER'S SOIL ENGINEER SPECIFIES. 28. ANY SOFT OF LOOSE SOIL POCKETS FOUND ONSITE DURING THE STRIPPING OR RECOMPACTION PROCESS, THEY SHALL BE OVER EXCAVATED AND RECOMPACTED. 29. ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED IN HORIZONTAL LAYERS A MAXIMUM OF 8 INCHES IN LOOSE THICKNESS AND BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER'S SOIL ENGINEER. 30. SUBGRADE SOILS UNDER EXTERIOR CONCRETE SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED AS APPROVED, TESTED AND INSPECTED BY THE OWNER'S SOIL ENGINEER. 31. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN MOISTURE CONDITION RIGHT UP TO POURING OF CONCRETE. GRADING NOTES 1. GRADING AND LAND STABILIZATION SHALL INCLUDE EXCAVATION AND FILL OF STREETS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND UNDER THE DIRECTION, SUPERVISION, MONITORING, TESTING AND APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. 2. GRADING AND LAND STABILIZATION SHALL INCLUDE COST OF DEWATERING; REMOVING FROM THE SITE ALL STRIPPED VEGETATION, DEBRIS, STRUCTURES, POWER POLES, EXISTING PAVEMENT, BUILDINGS, TREES, AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIALS. 3. STOCKPILES OF EXISTING DELETERIOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF UNDER THE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF THE OWNER AND OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. 4. ALL IMPORTED FILL SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. 5. TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SHOWN REFLECTS A TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PERFORMED BY SIEGFRIED ENGINEERING AND RECORD INFORMATION, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ANY AND ALL SEDIMENT AND/OR EROSION CONTROL DETAILS CONTAINED WITHIN THESE PLANS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED AS "REFERENCE DETAILS" ONLY AND THE CITY'S APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS AND "REFERENCE DETAILS" DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER/DEVELOPER FROM COMPLIANCE WITH THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AS APPROVED BY THE CITY'S STORM WATER DIVISION. UTILITY NOTES WATER 1. ALL WATER LINES SHALL BE PRESSURE-TESTED, DISINFECTED, FLUSHED, AND TESTED FOR BACTERIA IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SPECIFICATIONS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY. 2. ALL WATER SERVICES SHALL BE 1" MINIMUM. WATER SERVICE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO WATER MAINS WITH TWO-STRAP BRONZE SADDLES. CITY SHALL MAKE ALL TAPS ON EXISTING WATER MAINS ONLY. 3. ALL VALVES, TEES AND CROSSES TO BE FLANGED TO THEIR RESPECTIVE FITTINGS. WATER VALVES TO BE RESILIENT SEAT ONLY. 4. WATER LINES, VALVES, BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICES, FIRE HYDRANTS, ETC. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARDS. 5. ALL VALVE STEMS MUST BE BROUGHT TO A MINIMUM OF 4' BELOW FINISH GRADE WITH STEM EXTENSION UNITS. 6. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL REQUIRED LOCATIONS ON WATER LINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. STORM DRAIN 1. STORM DRAIN PIPE SIZES SHALL NOT BE CHANGED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 2. STORM DRAIN PIPE ALTERNATIVES: a. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), PER CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD b. HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE), PER CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD c. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC), PER CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD d. STEEL REINFORCED HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (SRHDPE), PER CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD e. CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE PIPE, PER CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD 3. CATCH BASINS TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY STANDARD DETAILS. 4. ALL CONSTRUCTION SITE ACTIVITIES, REGARDLESS OF PROJECT SIZE, SHALL CONFORM TO CHAPTER 16 OF THESE STANDARDS. PROJECTS GREATER THAN ONE (1) ACRE SHALL ALSO CONFORM TO THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD (SWRCB) GENERAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STORM WATER PERMIT. SANITARY SEWER 1. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND PIPE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARDS. 8"SD 8"SS PROPERTY & R/W LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE WATER LINE AREA DRAIN CONCRETE WALK GATE VALVE SITE LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT UTILITY POLE SIGN BOLLARD TREE E ELECTRICAL BOX ANCHOR GUY W WATER METER E 100 FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION 12.05FG 11.93TC 11.43FL TOP OF CURB ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION 11.93EC 11.93C 11.93ETC 11.43EFL 12.05EFG CONCRETE ELEVATION CONTOUR MAJOR 6" VERTICAL CURB 8"SD 8"SS 12"W E W E 100 95 CONTOUR MINOR 95 MAINTENANCE HOLE PER COR STD DETAIL NO. DR-4 PAVEMENT ELEVATION 12.05P 11.93TC 11.43P TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PAVEMENT ELEVATION 11.93ETC 11.43EP 12.05EP TSB T TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX/VAULT TSB T C CABLE BOX C B BACKFLOW PREVENTER 12"W FLOWLINE ELEVATION 12.05EFL 12.05FL 6"FS FIRE SERVICE LINE 6" FS FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION DRAIN INLET EASEMENT LINE CATCH BASIN BFP BFP THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG1.01 GENERAL NOTES.dwg 3/28/2022

COM EL EL OH EL STOP STOP STOP OH OH OH OH STOP E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E EL

ICV EL ICV
ICV ICV SD WT WT ICV ICV WT 15" SD 15" SD 15" SD 12" SD 12" SD 12" SD 6"SS 4"SS WT STOP STOP ICV ICV 6"SD 6"SD
8"SD
6"SD 8"SD 8"SS 12"SD
12"SD 12"SD 12" SD 6"SD 3"SD 8"SD W EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV 8"SD 6"SD 6"SD 6"SD 8"SD 18"SD 6"SS 6"SS 18"SD 8"SS
8"W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 5"SD 6"FS 8"SS 8"SD
8"SD
12"SD SSMH RIM 265.65 INV 259.83 6"NW INV 260.30 4"E INV 259.97 6"SE 15" SD 15" SD 15" SD 6"SS 257.0258.0259.0 260.0 261.0 256.5 257.5258.5259.5 260.5 257.0 258.0 259.0 260.0 257.5 258.5 259.5 260.5 256.0 256.5 256.0 256.5 266.0 267.0 266.5 267.5 265.0 264.5 265.5 264.0 264.0 265.0 265.0 265.0 265.0 264.5 264.5 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 8"SD 12"SD 15" SD 6"SD 16"W 16"W 8" SD
8" SD
12"W
15" SD
15" SD 8"W 8"W 3"W 3"W 3"W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SDMH RIM 264.48 INV 256.48 15"NE INV 256.48 15"SE 3"W8"W SDDI RIM 257.90 INV 252.00 8"E INV 252.00 12"W INV 252.50 12"N SDDI RIM 256.18 INV 253.60 6"NE INV 253.10 12"S SDDI RIM 255.44 INV 252.00 12"N INV 251.27 12"NE INV 251.25 8"SW INV 252.81 6"NW INV 251.12 12"SE SDDI RIM 255.38 INV 250.14 12"NW INV 250.20 12"E INV 250.11 12"S SDDI RIM 258.42 INV 253.27 12"WSDDI RIM 255.27 INV 249.54 12"N INV 251.27 8"NW INV 249.52 12"SW SDDI RIM 252.10 INV 248.25 12"NE INV 248.32 12"NE INV 248.26 12"SE INV 247.90 18"W SDMH RIM 263.28 INV 255.45 14"NW INV 255.34 14"SE WM WM WT WT 8"W 12" SD
12"SD 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

12.5' PUE
15' PUE
60' ACCESS EASEMENT CG2.01 TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 1. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE EXISTING DRY UTILITIES POT HOLED FOR VERIFICATION OF LOCATION AND DEPTH. AT SUCH TIME, POT HOLE DATA SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER FOR DETERMINATION OF ADEQUATE CLEARANCE AND SEPARATION. 2. ALL EXCAVATIONS SPOILS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT EXCAVATION, SHALL BE EXPORTED AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. 3. EXISTING STRUCTURES, CONCRETE, PAVEMENT, FENCES, CURBS, UTILITY BOXES, LIGHTS, GATES, ETC. NOT CALLED OUT IN PLANS TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TREE PROTECTION AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PRESERVE EXISTING TREES. TREES NOT IDENTIFIED AS TO BE REMOVED OR TO REMAIN ARE ASSUMED TO REMAIN. DEMOLITION NOTES: DEMOLITION LEGEND: CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING UNDEVELOPED AREAS, REMOVAL DEPTH SHALL ACCOMMODATE DEPTH OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE, REMOVAL DEPTH SHALL ACCOMMODATE DEPTH OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT, REMOVAL DEPTH SHALL ACCOMMODATE DEPTH OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG2.01 TOPOGRAPHY & DEMOLITION PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 COM EL EL EL STOP STOP STOP STOP SD WT WT ICV ICV WT WT STOP STOP ICV ICV EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV WM WM WT WT 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

12.5' PUE 25'

25.5' 23.5'

23.1'

20.2' 24.9'± 24.9'± 5' R27'
15' PUE
60' ACCESS EASEMENT 5.5' 5' 5.5' 5' 5'
5' CG3.01 PAVING & DIMENSIONING PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE GENERAL PAVING AND DIMENSIONING NOTES: ALL MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION). 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY QUESTION THAT MAY ARISE CONCERNING THE INTENT, PLACEMENT, OR LIMITS OF DIMENSIONS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, FACE OF BUILDING, CENTER OF PAINT STRIPING OR PERPENDICULAR TO THE PROPERTY LINE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSIONS MATCH STRUCTURAL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL COORDINATE POINTS ARE AT FACE OF CURB OR RADIUS POINT. BUILDING CONTROL POINTS ARE AT THE OUTER MOST EDGE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RESTORING TO ITS ORIGINAL OR BETTER CONDITIONS, ANY DAMAGE DONE TO EXISTING UTILITIES, FENCE, PAVEMENT, CURBS, DRIVEWAYS OR SIDEWALKS TO REMAIN (NO SEPARATE PAY ITEM). 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS, AND SIDEWALKS AT NEW PAVEMENT, CURB AND SIDEWALK JUNCTURES. NO JAGGED OR IRREGULAR CUTS WILL BE ALLOWED OR ACCEPTED. 8. REFER TO SITE PAVING PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL, STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 9. SEE CIVIL DETAIL SHEET FOR APPLICABLE DETAILS. 10. REFER TO PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXISTING FACILITIES AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ALL PAINT SHALL BE 4" WIDE REFLECTIVE PAINT: WHITE ON ASPHALT PAVING AND WHITE ON TOP OF 6" WIDE BLACK STRIPE ON CONCRETE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 13. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL RECEIVE TWO COATS OF PAINT. 14. NO WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT A PERMIT. 15. ALL SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO MUTCD, LATEST EDITION. 16. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALK SHALL BE 5' MIN. WIDTH UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. SLOPED AT 1.25% TOWARDS CURB. 17. ALL CURBS ARE 6" HIGH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18. FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL, SEE SHEET C4.0, OVERALL GRADING PLAN. PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG3.01 PAVING & DIMENSIONING PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 PAVING LEGEND: CONCRETE EXISTING CONCRETE CONCRETE TO REMAIN TRUNCATED DOMES TRUNCATED DOMES COMPLYING WITH CBC 11B-705. ASPHALT PAVEMENT 6" 6" VERTICAL CONCRETE CURB NOT TO SCALE 1 6" 1 12" 6" VARIES 7 12" R=12" R=12" 2-58"Ø X 24" STEEL DOWEL BARS AT 12" C.C. GREASED AND WRAPPED ONE SIDE THROUGH EVERY EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL UNDER CURB SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE COMPACTION FOR A DEPTH OF 6" PAVEMENT/ CONCRETE PROVIDE TRANSVERSE SCORE JOINT AT 10' O.C. BASE MATERIAL SUBGRADE WEAKEND PLANE JOINT NOT TO SCALE 2 REINFORCEMENT CENTERED IN SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINT NOT TO SCALE 3 REINFORCEMENT CENTERED INSLAB COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" CLASS II A.B. SUB-BASE SLAB PER PLAN PREFORMED FIBER EXPANSION JOINT FILLER CONFORMING TO ASTM D-1751 @ EXPANSION JOINTS, OMIT AT CONSTRUCTION JOINTS 5/8"Øx18" SMOOTH GREASED DOWEL @ 24" O.C. COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" CLASS II A.B. SUB-BASE 2"x1/4" SAWCUT SLAB PER PLAN REBAR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE ACROSS CONSTRUCTION JOINTS.

COM EL EL EL STOP STOP STOP STOP SD WT WT ICV ICV WT WT STOP STOP ICV ICV EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV 257.0258.0259.0 260.0 261.0 256.5 257.5258.5259.5 260.5 257.0 258.0 259.0 260.0 257.5 258.5 259.5 260.5 256.0 256.5 256.0 256.5 266.0 267.0 266.5 267.5 265.0 264.5 265.5 264.0 264.0 265.0 265.0 265.0 265.0 264.5 264.5 WM WM WT WT 2:1
3:1
2:1
4:1 4.50% LVL 1 FF=256.50 LVL 2 FF=267.83 265.33C MATCH EX 264.51C MATCH EX 7.63%

6.88%

4.63% EFF=256.50 259.0 260.0 261.0 262.0263.0 259.5 260.5 261.5262.5 258.00TC 257.50P 257.95TC 257.45P 1.24%

1.90% 258.20TC 257.70P 258.32TC 257.82P 4.81%1.76% 0.93%

1.66% 3.26% 1.55% 1.04% 1.70% 7.64% 256.0 256.0 256.0 256.0 256.5 256.5 256.5 256.5 263.0 264.0 265.0 263.5 264.5 259.0 260.0 261.0 262.0263.0 259.5 260.5 261.5262.5 257.0 258.0
257.5
258.5
60' ACCESS EASEMENT 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

12.5' PUE
15' PUE CG4.01 GRADING PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE LEGEND GRADE SLOPE PERCENTAGE 3.0 EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR 3.0 PROPOSED GROUND CONTOUR % GRADING LEGEND ABBREVIATION BWBOW CDGECEFL EGELEPEX. FFFGFPFLGGBHPLBLPMAX MIN PTCTOW TYP BACK OF WALK BOTTOM OF WALL CONCRETE DECOMPOSED GRANITE EXISTING CONCRETE EXISTING FLOWLINE EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FINISH GROUND FINISH PAD ELEVATION FLOWLINE GROUND GRADE BREAK HIGH POINT LIGHT BASE LOW POINT MAXIMUM MINIMUM PAVEMENT TOP OF CURB TOP OF WALL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION GRADE BREAK G.B. RIDGE RIDGE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 6' RETAINING WALL 6' RETAINING WALL 6' RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL TO SECOND FLOOR OF PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG4.01 GRADING PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 LID LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. LID LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. LID LANDSCAPE AREA, TYP. 4.5%MAX 2%MAX

4.5%MAX

4.5%MAX

4.5%MAX

4.5%MAX

4.5%MAX

4.5%MAX
2%MAX 2%MAX
COM EL EL OH EL STOP STOP STOP OH OH OH OH STOP E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SD WT WT ICV ICV WT 15" SD 15" SD 15" SD 6"SS 4"SS WT STOP STOP ICV ICV 6"SD 6"SD 8"SD
6"SD 8"SD 8"SS 12"SD
12"SD 12" SD 6"SD 3"SD 8"SD W EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV 8"SD 6"SD 6"SD 6"SD 8"SD 18"SD 6"SS 6"SS 18"SD 8"SS
8"W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 5"SD 6"FS 8"SS 8"SD SSMH RIM 265.65 INV 259.83 6"NW INV 260.30 4"E INV 259.97 6"SE 15" SD 15" SD 15" SD 6"SS E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E 8"SD 12"SD 15" SD 6"SD 16"W 16"W 8" SD
8" SD
12"W
15" SD
15" SD 8"W 8"W 3"W 3"W 3"W E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SDMH RIM 264.48 INV 256.48 15"NE INV 256.48 15"SE 3"W8"W SDDI RIM 255.27 INV 249.54 12"N INV 251.27 8"NW INV 249.52 12"SW SDDI RIM 252.10 INV 248.25 12"NE INV 248.32 12"NE INV 248.26 12"SE INV 247.90 18"W SDMH RIM 263.28 INV 255.45 14"NW INV 255.34 14"SE WM WM WT WT 12"SD SD SD SD SD 8"W SD SD SD

SD PERF PERF PERF PERF

PERF PERF
PERF SD 12"SD 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

12.5' PUE
15' PUE
60' ACCESS EASEMENT CG5.01 UTILITY PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS CONTRACT SHALL CONFORM TO ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION) AND THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (LATEST EDITION). 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ACQUIRING ALL PERMITS, TESTS, APPROVALS AND ACCEPTANCES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS WHETHER SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOT. 4. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION. 5. DUE TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS TITLE 49, PART 192.181, CITY PUBLIC SERVICE MUST MAINTAIN ACCESS TO GAS VALVES AT ALL TIMES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT AND WORK AROUND ANY GAS VALVES THAT ARE IN THE PROJECT AREA. 6. ALL SPOIL AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FROM THIS WORK SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR, AT HIS EXPENSE. 7. EXTREME CAUTION SHALL BE USED WHEN NEAR PG&E FACILITIES. EXACT DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PG&E GAS MAIN UNKNOWN 8. WATER SERVICES NOT USED SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE MAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FROM CITY OF STOCKTON FOR THIS WORK. 9. PROVIDE AN 18 GAUGE (BLUE) TRACER WIRE WITH SITE PVC PIPING EXISTING UTILITIES: 1. EXISTING UTILITY DATA SHOWN ON THIS LAYOUT WAS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY OF THE VISIBLE FEATURES AT THE SITE AND PUBLIC RECORD MAPS OBTAINED FORM UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WITHIN 48 HOURS PRIOR OF CONSTRUCTION TO LOCATE AND TAG THEIR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO ALLOW FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF UNDETECTED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ALSO, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALLOW FOR CHANGES DUE TO UTILITIES BEING IN LOCATIONS DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE UTILITY RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND EXPOSING CONFLICTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF UTILITIES MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE UTILITY SERVICE LINES AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS IMMEDIATELY. ANY DAMAGE BY THE CONTRACTOR TO EXISTING UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR NOT, SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR, AT HIS EXPENSE. TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY PROTECTION: CONTRACTOR AND / OR CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENTLY RETAINED EMPLOYEE OR STRUCTURAL DESIGN / GEOTECHNICAL / SAFETY / EQUIPMENT CONSULTANT, IF ANY, SHALL REVIEW THESE PLANS AND ANY AVAILABLE GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION AND THE ANTICIPATED INSTALLATION SITES WITHIN THE PROJECT WORK AREA IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT CONTRACTOR'S TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY PROTECTION SYSTEMS, PROGRAMS, AND / OR PROCEDURES FOR THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE SYSTEMS, PROGRAMS AND / OR PROCEDURES SHALL PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY PROTECTION THAT COMPLY WITH AS A MINIMUM, OSHA STANDARDS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATIONS, SPECIFICALLY, CONTRACTOR AND / OR CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENTLY RETAINED EMPLOYEE OR SAFETY CONSULTANT SHALL IMPLEMENT A TRENCH SAFETY PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA STANDARDS GOVERNING THE PRESENCE AND ACTIVITIES OF INDIVIDUALS WORKING IN AND AROUND TRENCH EXCAVATION. PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED MANHOLE SHUT OFF VALVE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE PROPOSED WATER LINE PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE LINE SSWFS PROPOSED DRAIN INLET SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE UTILITY LEGEND: FH PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LINE PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE IRR PROPOSED IRRIGATION LINE OH EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE AT&T EXISTING AT&T LINE PG&E EXISTING PG&E LINE EXISTING MANHOLE SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE W EXISTING WATER LINE UTIL EXISTING UTILITY BOX/VAULT EXISTING STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET PROPERTY LINE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG5.01 UTILITY PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 FLOW FLOW 24" OR 36" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE STORM DRAIN FROM NEARBY CATCHBASIN WHEN APPLICABLE SLOPE BOTTOM WITH CONCRETE AT END OF LINE CATCHBASIN CONCRETE BASE STORM DRAIN CONCRETE COLLAR 6" 6" FINISHED PAVEMENT CALIFORNIA CONCRETE PRODUCTS A-147 ASSY. (FRAME AND GRATE ASSEMBLY) OR EQUAL. STORM DRAIN INLET NOT TO SCALE 1 6" 6" < TWO (2) 12" STORM DRAIN LINES, USE 24" Ø INLET > TWO (2) 12" STORM DRAIN LINES OR AN 18" LINE(S), USE 36" Ø INLET AREA DRAIN NOT TO SCALE 2 FINISH GRADE DRAIN PIPE, REFER TO UTILITY PLANS BACKFILL MATERIAL PER SPECS. PLACED UNIFORMLY IN 12" LIFTS AND COMPACTED, 85% RELATIVE DENSITY IN PLANTER AREAS AND 95% RELATIVE DENSITY IN CONCRETE PAVED AREAS UNDISTURBED OR RECOMPACTED SUBGRADE. NYLOPLAST CATCH BASIN 4"
VARIES ATRIUM GRATE IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, FLAT CAST (ADA COMPLAINT) IRON GRATE IN CONCRETE, OR PAVED AREAS WITH H20 LOADING IN PARKING LOT COM EL EL EL STOP STOP STOP STOP SD WT WT WT STOP STOP ICV ICV STOP EL B B B G TEL EL ICV ICV EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL WM WM WT WT 0.50 FT-CDL CONTOUR 0.50 FT-CDL COVERAGE AREA PARKING LOT LIGHTING KIM LIGHTING VL SERIES VLA29W5 750W HPS 480V FIXTURES ON A 30 POLE WITH A 2 FOOT CONCRETE BASE. CUT OFF SHIELD WILL BE UTILIZED AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT SPILL OVER LIGHTING. LIGHTING LEGEND EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PROPOSED KIM LIGHTING - CURVILINER VL SERIES LIGHT FIXTURES EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE CG5.02 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA MEDICAL PLAZA DRIVE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHT FIXTURE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG5.02 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 COM EL EL EL TEL EL ICV STOP STOP STOP STOP E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SD WT WT ICV ICV WT WT STOP STOP E E E E TFMR EL TFMR ICV ICV ICV ICV ICV ICV ICV ICV E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E STOP STOP STOP STOP EL B B B G TEL EL ICV ICV EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E WM WM WT WT 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 15' PUE 60' ACCESS EASEMENT

12.5' PUE 15' 60' SCALE: 1"=30' 0' 30' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED ROSEVILLE UTILITY EASEMENT CG5.03 UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG5.03 UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT.dwg 3/28/2022 COM EL EL EL TEL EL ICV W 8"W
8"W STOP STOP 16"W
6"FS STOP 16"W 16"W
12"W 8"W 3"W8"W STOP SD WT WT WT STOP STOP ICV ICV W STOP EL B B B G TEL EL ICV ICV EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV 8"W ICV ICV TEL 8"W 16"W
6"FS 16"W 16"W
12"W 8"W8"W 3"W 3"W8"W WM WM WT WT 8"W 60' ACCESS EASEMENT 25' ACCESS EASEMENT 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT

12.5' PUE
15' PUE CG6.01 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WITH 150' HOSE SWEEP LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 150' 150' 150' 150' MEDICAL PLAZA DRIVE PROPERTY LINE 150' EXISTING FDC RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG6.01 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 COM EL EL EL STOP STOP STOP STOP SD WT WT WT STOP STOP ICV ICV EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV WM WM WT WT CG7.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN MEDICAL PLAZA EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE 3' 3' VARIES 10' MIN 2" 4" CONCRETE WASHOUT NOTES: 1. ACTUAL LAYOUT DETERMINED IN FIELD. 2. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT SIGN SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 30 FT. OF THE TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY. 12" MIN. 4' MAX. 4' MAX. 4' MAX. 4' MAX. NOTE: INSTALL FIBER ROLL ALONG A LEVEL CONTOUR. 2" MIN. 4" MAX. SLOPE % ROLL SPACING 0-25 50 FT 25-50 15 FT 50% OF GREATER 10 FT INSTALL A FIBER ROLL NEAR SLOPE WHERE IT TRANSITIONS INTO A STEEPER SLOPE FIBER ROLL 8" MIN. 3/4"x3/4" WOOD STAKES MAX. 4' SPACING FIBER ROLLS BINDING WIRE STRAW BALE STAPLES (2 PER BALE) 10 ML PLASTIC LINING NATIVE MATERIAL (OPTIONAL) WOOD OR METAL STAKES (2 PER BALE) 10 MIL PLASTIC LINING STRAW BALE (TYP) WOOD POST 3"x3"x8' 0.5" LAG SCREWS PLYWOOD 48"x48" PAINTED WHITE BLACK LETTERS 6" HEIGHT ENTRENCHMENT DETAIL TYPICAL FIBER ROLL INSTALLATION 1/8" Ø STEEL WIRE STAKE (TYP) SECTION B-B STAPLE DETAIL PLAN RUNOFF WATER WITH SEDIMENT PLAN VIEW SECTION C-C CROSS DRAIN FILTER BAG MAXIMUM BAG DEPTH AT TOP OF DRAIN FILTERED RUNOFF EXISTING DRAIN INLET 12" LAP (MIN.) EXISTING AC PAVING EXISTING DRAINAGE GRATE EXISTING DRAINAGE GRATE 12" LAP (MIN.) FILTER BAG CROSS DRAIN ℄ VERTICAL SPACING MEASURED ALONG THE FACE OF THE SLOPE VARIES BETWEEN 10' AND 20' NOTES: 1. FOR USE IN CLEARED AND GRUBBED AND IN GRADED AREAS. 2. SHAPE BASIN SO THAT LONGEST INFLOW AREA FACES LONGEST LENGTH OF TRAP. 3. FOR CONCENTRATED FLOWS, SHAPE BASIN IN 2:1 RATION WITH LENGTH ORIENTED TOWARDS DIRECTION OF FLOW. DRAIN INLET 12" MIN 24" MAX. 4' CONCRETE WASHOUT SCALE: NTS 3 FIBER ROLLS SCALE: NTS 2 TEMPORARY GRAVEL BAG FILTER AT DROP INLET SCALE: NTS 4 DI PROTECTION - TYPE 2 SCALE: NTS 1 SECTION A-A SHEET FLOW PLAN SHEET FLOW SHEET FLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW ROCK FILTER (USE IF FLOW IS CONCENTRATED) EDGE OF SEDIMENT TRAP DRAIN INLET GEOTEXTILE BLANKET SILT FENCE A A CC NOTE: REMOVE SEDIMENT BEFORE REACHING 1/3 FULL. STABILIZE AREA AND GRADE UNIFORMLY AROUND PERIMETER GEOTEXTILE BLANKET SILT FENCE 1:1 SLOPE B B NOTES: 1. THE MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA PER FILTER SHALL BE NO MORE THAN .06 HECTACRES (2 ACRES). 2. THE FILTER BAG SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM UV RESISTANT POLYPROPYLENE NYLON, POLYESTER, OR ETHYLENE FABRIC WITH A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH OF 50 LBS PER LINEAL FOOT. AN EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE NOT GREATER THAN A 20 SIEVE AND WITH A MINIMUM FLOW RATE OF 40 GALLON/SQFT. 3. THE FILTER BAG MAY BE SUSPENDED FROM OR HELD IN PLACE BY EXISTING INLET GRATE (OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD), PROVIDING NO MODIFICATION OR DRAINAGE SHALL BE DONE TO THE INLET GRATE OR FRAME. THE INLET GRATE SHALL NOT BE CAUSED TO REST MORE THAN 1.3CM (.5") ABOVE THE INLET FRAME (SEE DETAIL A). 4. THE FILTER BAG MAY EXTEND TO THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET BOX PROVIDED THE OUTLET PIPE IS UNOBSTRUCTED. 5. FLOWS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO BYPASS THE BAG. THE BAG OR IT'S FRAME SHALL CATCH FLOWS AT ALL SIDES OF THE INLET EXCEPT AS SHOWN FOR FLOOD RELEASE. 6. INLET FILTER BAGS SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL DURING THE WET SEASON AND MONTHLY DURING THE DRY SEASON. SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED BEFORE ACCUMULATIONS HAVE REACHED ONE THIRD THE DEPTH OF THE BAG. BAGS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS SOON AS DAMAGE OCCURS.

1.3 CM (.5")
MAX EXISTING DROP INLET GRATE FILTER BAG FRAME (OPTIONAL) EXISTING DROP INLET FRAME EXISTING OPEN BACK HOOD DETAIL A MAXIMUM BAG DEPTH MINIMUM BAG WIDTH (BACK OF GRATE) OUTLET PIPE 5CM (2") MINIMUM AT BACK OF (FLOOD RELEASE) CATCH BASIN FILTER BAGS & PROTECTION NO SCALE 5 TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET ON SUMP TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET ON GRADE EDGE OF PAVEMENT FLOW FLOW SPILLWAY, 1-BAG HIGH SANDBAGS 2-BAGS HIGH INLET EDGE OF PAVEMENT FLOW FLOW SPILLWAY, 1-BAG HIGH SANDBAGS 2-BAGS HIGH NOTES: 1. INTENDED FOR SHORT-TERM USE. 2. USE TO INHIBIT NON-STORM WATER FLOW. 3. ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. 4. BAGS MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED. 5. NOT APPLICABLE IN AREAS WITH HIGH SILTS AND CLAYS WITHOUT FILTER FABRIC. EROSION CONTROL PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30' SYMBOL DESCRIPTION FIBER ROLLED WATTLE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET CONCRETE WASHOUT, CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE LOCATION, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET EROSION CONTROL LEGEND: DRAIN INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES: 1. PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO SHOW ALL OFFSETS. THE SITE IS DYNAMIC AND CHANGES ON A DAILY BASIS, CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PREDICT ALL POSSIBLE SITUATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO ENSURE QUALITY CONTROL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE CURRENT STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP). IT IS THE CONTRACTORS SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCTING HIS/HER OPERATIONS IN ADHERENCE TO THE SWPPP. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY FINES, DELAYS, AND/OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY STATE WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANCTIONS CAUSED BY THE OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS/HER SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. THE FOLLOWING PLANS ARE ACCURATE FOR EROSION CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THESE PLANS UNLESS FIELD CONDITIONS DICTATE MODIFICATION. IF MODIFICATION IS NECESSARY, A SWPPP AMENDMENT MUST BE DONE. THIS MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATION TO THESE DRAWINGS AND ENGINEER CONCURRENCE. 4. INSPECT AND REPAIR FILTERS AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN 1/2 OF THE FILTER DEPTH HAS BEEN FILLED. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN AN AREA TRIBUTARY TO A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER FILTERING MEASURE. SEDIMENT AND GRAVEL SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM PAVEMENT OF ROAD. 5. UNFINISHED AND DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED WITH AN APPLICATION OF BLOWN STRAW AND ORGANIC BINDER. ITEM LB/ACRE STRAW 4,000 ORGANIC BINDER 200 6. ALTERNATE INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE USED ON ROADS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC IF ANY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR WASTES WHICH HAVE BEEN TREATED, STORED, DISPOSED, SPILLED, OR LEAKED IN SIGNIFICANT QUANTITIES ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE THEM FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY. 7. CHLORINATED OR DECHLORINATED WATER SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTOR MAY DISPOSE THIS WATER INTO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM UPON APPROVAL BY THE GOVERNING AGENCY. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, AND REPAIR PROCEDURES TO ENSURE THAT ALL GRADED SURFACES, WALLS, BERMS, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, VEGETATION, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER CONTROLS ARE MAINTAINED IN GOOD AND EFFECTIVE CONDITION AND ARE PROMPTLY REPAIRED OR RESTORED WHEN NECESSARY. ANY DEWATERING WATER SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO THE STORM WATER SYSTEM, AND SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM. 9. ALL DEWATERING WATER MUST BE CHANNELED THROUGH AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BARRIER PRIOR TO THE WATER ENTERING THE STORM SYSTEM. 10. PAVEMENT CLEANING- FLUSHING OF STREETS/ PARKING LOTS TO REMOVE DIRT AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS IS PROHIBITED UNLESS PROPER SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE USED. PREFERABLY, AREAS REQUIRING CLEANING SHOULD BE SWEPT. 11. ALL STOCKPILES OF MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT GOING TO BE USED FOR 14 DAYS SHALL BE COVERED. 12. CONTRACTOR TO USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. USE ALL BMPs THAT APPLY TO THE PROJECT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING BMPs: A. DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - CALIFORNIA STORMWATER BMP HANDBOOK SECTION SE-10 B. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT - CALIFORNIA STORMWATER BMP HANDBOOK SECTION WM-5 C. MATERIAL STORAGE - CALIFORNIA STORMWATER BMP HANDBOOK SECTION WM-1 D. PAVING - CALIFORNIA STORMWATER BMP HANDBOOK SECTION NS-3 E. DUST CONTROL, SEDIMENT CONTROL, EROSION CONTROL AND CONCRETE WASHOUT AREAS - SHOWN ON THIS SHEET WITH DETAILS FLOW DIRECTION (EXISTING) FLOW DIRECTION (PROPOSED) SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET X CONSTRUCTION FENCE GRAVEL BAGS THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-CG7.01 EROSION CONTROL PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 WT ICV ICV EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV C 2" RS 2" SYMBOL DESCRIPTION EXISTING IRRIGATION Existing landscape areas that are altered or modified by the new project. Existing irrigation system and stationing to remain. Modifications to be made by Contractor to existing system, mainline, laterals and heads in existing landscape areas effected by construction. SHRUB DRIPLINE 0.9 GPH @ 12" O.C. Dripline with 0.90 gph emitters at 12" O.C., row spacing at 12" O.C. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION Rain Bird RWS-B-C-SOCK 1401 Root Watering System with 4" diameter x 36" long with locking grate, semi-rigid mesh tube.1402 at 0.5 GPM. 2 per tree, typical. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION Rain Bird XCZ-100-PRB-COM Wide Flow Drip Control Kit for Commercial Applications. 1" Ball Valve with 1" PESB Valve and 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filter. 0.3 GPM-20 GPM Rain Bird XCZ-150-PRB-COM High Flow Control Zone Kit, for Large Commercial Drip Zones. 1-1/2" PESB Valve with two 1" Pressure Regulating 40psi Quick-Check Basket Filters. Flow range: 15-40 GPM. Rain Bird ARV050 1/2" Air Relief Valve. Rain Bird OPERIND Drip System Operation Indicator. Place within 8` of valve. SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION Rain Bird PESB 1", 1-1/2", 2" Plastic Industrial Valves. Low Flow Operating Capability, Globe Configuration. Rain Bird 44-LRC 1" Brass Quick-Coupling Valve, with Corrosion-Resistant Stainless Steel Spring, Locking Thermoplastic Rubber Cover, and 2-Piece Body. Nibco T-113 Class 125 bronze gate shut off valve with wheel handle, same size as mainline pipe diameter at valve location. Size Range - 1/4" - 3" Rain Bird ESP8LXME with (01) ESPLXMSM4 12 Station Commercial Controller. Locked, metal enclosure. Rain Bird WR2-RFS Wireless Rain/Freeze Sensor. Point of Connection Point of connection at exsiting Class 315 2" Mainline. Point of Connection Point of connection at exsiting Class 315 2" Mainline. Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Schedule 40 Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 315 SDR 13.5 (2") Pipe Sleeve: PVC Schedule 40 Typical pipe sleeve for irrigation pipe. Min. size 2x diameter of pipe being sleeved. Extend sleeves 24" beyond edges of paving or construction. 1401 1402 1404 1408 OCRS #" # Valve Number Valve Size Valve Flow Valve Callout # IRRIGATION LEGEND LG1.01 IRRIGATION PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA DRIVE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND STANDARDS. 2. THE INTENT OF THIS IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER REQUIRED TO SUSTAIN GOOD PLANT HEALTH. LANDSCAPE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE 100% COVERAGE OF SYSTEM. 3. INSTALL NEW REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOXES 12" FROM WALK, CURB, EQUIPMENT, OR LANDSCAPE FEATURE. AT MULTIPLE VALVE BOX GROUPS, EACH BOX SHALL BE AN EQUAL DISTANCE FROM THE WALK, CURB, LAWN, ETC. AND EACH BOX SHALL BE 12" APART. SHORT SIDE OF RECTANGULAR VALVE BOXES SHALL BE PARALLEL TO WALK, CURB, LAWN, ETC. 4. ALL PVC SLEEVES UNDER PAVEMENT AND ROADWAYS TO BE SCH. 40. SLEEVES TO BE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE THAT WILL PASS THROUGH SLEEVE. CHANGE ALL RING-TITE PIPE THAT WOULD PASS THROUGH SLEEVES TO CLASS 315 SOLVENT WELD PIPE OF SAME SIZE. 5. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SYSTEM AS DESIGNED WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT OBSTRUCTIONS OR GRADE DIFFERENCES EXIST THAT WERE NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS. SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. OTHERWISE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY NECESSARY REVISIONS. 1. NEW IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL TAP INTO EXISTING IRRIGATION MAINLINE. 2. NEW PEDESTAL, WEATHER-BASED IRRIGATION CONTROLLER WITH RAIN SENSOR. 3. IRRIGATION SHALL CONSIST OF DRIP FOR SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS AND AN ISOLATED VALVE WITH DRIP BUBBLERS FOR TREES. GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES IRRIGATION DESIGN SUMMARY PROJECT INCLUDES A NEW IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING MEASURES TO BE MET: 1. IRRIGATION MUST BE SCHEDULED BETWEEN 9:00 P.M. AND 6:00 A.M. UNLESS WEATHER CONDITIONS PREVENT IT. 2. OPERATION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM OUTSIDE THE NORMAL WATERING WINDOW IS ALLOWED FOR AUDITING AND SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. 3. TOTAL ANNUAL APPLIED WATER SHALL BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) AS CALCULATED PER THE POTABLE WATER USE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SCHEDULING NOTE EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN I SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLANS. ROBERT J. NORBUTAS, JR., RLA 5595 LANDSCAPE SUMMARY TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 4,644 SF MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) XXX GALLON/YR ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) XXX GALLON/YR TREE LOCATION (PROPOSED) Layout reference of proposed trees. See sheet LG2.01. POINT OF CONNECTION AT EXISTING MAINLINE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION. POINT OF CONNECTION AT EXISTING MAINLINE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION. 1. EXISTING LAYOUT MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. MAINLINE AND LATERAL LAYOUT IS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. 3. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO PROJECT AREA. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND VALVES WITHIN PROJECT AREA AND CAP MAINLINE SYSTEM ACCORDINGLY. EXISTING IRRIGATION TO BE MODIFIED TO MAINTAIN IRRIGATION TO EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE EXISTING MAINLINE SYSTEM, SHUT-OFF AND CONTROLLER WITH OWNER. EXISTING IRRIGATION NOTES THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-LG1.01 IRRIGATION PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 WT ICV ICV EL B B B TEL EL ICV ICV ICV TEL EL ICV MEDIUM SHADE TREES 5 15 gallon trees. Low water use plants. Install medium sized trees in the street frontage areas. Drip bubbler irrigation. .Laurus nobilis / Sweet Bay Pistacia chinensis `Keith Davey` / Chinese Pistache Pyrus calleryana / Callery Pear Quercus rubra / Red Oak Robinia pseudoacacia 'Purple Robe' / Black Locust Ulmus parvifolia / Lacebark Elm NARROW SCREEN TREES 7 15 gallon trees. Low/medium water use trees. Perimeter areas requiring narrow, upright growth and screening. Drip bubbler irrigation. .Acer platanoides `Columnare` / Norway Maple Acer rubrum 'Armstrong' / Armstrong Red Maple Alnus cordata / Italian Alder Cedrus atlantica 'Fastigiata' / Columnar Atlas Cedar Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' / Maidenhair Tree ACCENT - SMALL TREES 8 15 gallon trees. Small space planting areas, entry and building accent. Spacing per plan. Drip bubbler irrigation. .Cercis occidentalis / Western Redbud Lagerstroemia x `Tuscarora` / Crape Myrtle Coral Pink Magnolia grandiflora 'Little Gem' / Dwarf Southern Magnolia Prunus cerasifera `Atropurpurea` / Purple-leaf Plum ENTRY AND ACCENT SHRUBS 1,710 sf 5 gallon and 1 gallon shrubs. Install entry and accent (6"-4` high) in entry perimeter planter areas. Medium and small sized shrubs, groundcovers and grasses Drip Irrigation. .Arctostaphylos x 'Emerald Carpet' / Emerald Carpet Manzanita Coleonema pulchrum 'Sunset Gold' / Golden Breath Of Heaven Festuca amethystina 'Superba' / Rainbow Fescue Festuca glauca 'Elijah Blue' / Elijah Blue Fescue Gazania rigens leucolaena / Trailing Gazania Hemerocallis x 'Stella de Oro' / Stella de Oro Daylily Hesperaloe parviflora 'Perpa' TM / Brakelights Red Yucca Penstemon heterophyllus 'Margarita BOP' / Margarita BOP Penstemon Phormium tenax 'Amazing Red' / Dwarf Red Flax Phormium x 'Platt's Black' / Platt's Black New Zealand Flax Salvia spathacea / Hummingbird Sage INTERIOR SITE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS 1,453 sf 5 gallon and 1 gallon shrubs. Install interior shrubs (6"-4` high) in interior planter areas. Medium and small sized shrubs, groundcovers and grasses. Drip Irrigation. .Baccharis pilularis / Coyote Brush Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' / Yankee Point Carmel Creeper Coleonema pulchrum 'Sunset Gold' / Golden Breath Of Heaven Dietes vegeta / African Iris Erigeron karvinskianus 'Profusion' / Profusion Santa Barbara Daisy Lantana montevidensis / Trailing Lantana Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' / Canyon Prince Giant Wild Rye Lomandra longifolia 'Platinum Beauty' / Platinum Beauty Dwarf Mat Rush Loropetalum chinense rubrum 'Ruby' / Ruby Fringe Flower Mahonia aquifolium 'Compacta' / Compact Oregon Grape Muhlenbergia capillaris 'Lenca' TM / Regal Mist Pink Muhly Grass Myoporum parvifolium / Trailing Myoporum Nandina domestica / Heavenly Bamboo Osteospermum fruticosum 'African Queen' / Trailing African Daisy Salvia greggii / Autumn Sage Xylosma congestum 'Compacta' / Compact Xylosma STREETSCAPE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS 1,656 sf 1 and 5 gallon shrubs. Drought tolerant, low water-use plants. Install streetscape shrubs(18"-4` high) in streetscape planter areas, in curb planter strips and at back of walk. Drip irrigation. .Arctostaphylos x 'Emerald Carpet' / Emerald Carpet Manzanita Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' / Pigeon Point Coyote Brush Berberis aquifolium 'Compacta' / Compact Oregon Grape Holly Ceanothus griseus horizontalis 'Yankee Point' / Yankee Point Carmel Creeper Erigeron karvinskianus 'Profusion' / Profusion Santa Barbara Daisy Juniperus horizontalis 'Blue Chip' / Blue Chip Juniper Pennisetum orientale 'Karley Rose' / Karley Rose Fountain Grass Rhaphiolepis indica 'Ballerina' / Ballerina Indian Hawthorn CONCE3T8AL 3LANT LEGEND EXISTING LANDSCAPE Existing planting to remain and be protected during construction. -BARK MULCH Natural chip bark mulch. 3" thick layer minimum. Landscape planting areas within the project site to receive chip bark mulch. - LG2.01 PLANTING PLAN 10' 20' SCALE: 1"=20' 0' 40' MEDICAL PLAZA DRIVE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN I SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLANS. ROBERT J. NORBUTAS, JR., RLA 5595 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE STANDARDS AND CODES. 2. ALL ASPHALT, BASE COURSE AND OTHER DEBRIS ARE TO BE REMOVED COMPLETELY BELOW PLANTING AREAS TO NATIVE SOIL LEVEL. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE AT 2% MINIMUM IN PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND APPLY THE APPROPRIATE PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE AT RATES PRESCRIBED BY LAW AND THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. ALL PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES SHALL BE APPLIED BY LICENSED OPERATORS UNDER FAVORABLE WEATHER CONDITIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING A SOILS TEST AND PROVIDING THE APPROPRIATE AMENDMENTS BASED ON THE TEST RESULTS. 6. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTED AREAS TO BE ONE (1) INCH BELOW PAVING. WATER SOIL THOROUGHLY BEFORE PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET AT SUCH A LEVEL THAT AFTER SETTLING THEY BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO THE SURROUNDING FINISH GRADE AS THEY BORE TO THE SOIL LINE GRADE IN THE CONTAINER, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OF ALL PLANTINGS, SUFFICIENT TO INSURE HEALTHY GROWTH. GENERAL 3LANTING NOTES LANDSCAPE SUMMARY TOTAL IRRIGATED AREA 4,644 SF MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA) XXX GALLON/YR ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) XXX GALLON/YR 1. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN WHEN GRADING OCCURS WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE. 2. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR QUESTIONS REGARDING TREE PROTECTION OCCUR AT TIME CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL WORK WITHIN THE EXISTING TREE ROOT ZONES SHALL BE DONE USING ALL POSSIBLE CARE TO AVOID INJURY TO ROOTS. 4. NO ROOTS LARGER THAN 2" SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT APPROVAL. CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF PLANT MATERIAL PLACEMENT IS IN CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ROOTS. 5. ROOT BARRIER,10 LINEAL FEET CENTERED ON TREES, TO BE INSTALLED WHEN TREE IS WITHIN 5' OF SIDEWALKS, ROADWAYS, BUILDING OR CURBS. TREE NOTES LMLLLMWATER USE MMMMMWATER USE VL LMLWATER USE MMLLMMLLLLLWATER USE LLMLLLLLMMLLLLLLWATER USE MLLLLLLMWATER USE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN 35'H X 20'W 30'H X 25'W 30'H X 20'W 40'H X 30'W 30'H X 20'W 40'H X 30'W MATURE SIZE 40'H X 15'W 40'H X 15'W 40'H X 20'W 40'H X 15'W 40'H X 20'W MATURE SIZE 20'H X 15'W 20'H X 15'W 15'H X 10'W 20'H X 15'W MATURE SIZE 1'H X 5'W 2'H X 4'W 1'H X 2'W 1.5'H X 1'W 1'H X 1'W 1'H X 1.5'W 2.5'H X 4'W 1'H X 2'W 1.5'H W 2'W 3'H X 2'W 2'H X 4'W MATURE SIZE 2'H X 7'W 2'H X 7'W 2'H X 4'W 3'H X 3'W 1'H X 3'W 1.5'H X 3'W 2'H X 3'W 2'H X 3'W 3'H X 4'W 2.5'H X 3'W 4'H X 4'W .5'H X 1'H 4'H X 4'W 1'H X 1'W 2'H X 2'W 6'H X 5'W MATURE SIZE 1'H X 5'W 2'H X 7'W 2'H X 3'W 2'H X 7'W 1'H X 3'W 1'H X 6'W 3'H X 3'W 3'H X 4'W MATURE SIZE THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-LG2.01 PLANTING PLAN.dwg 3/28/2022 SCH 40 PVC BUBBLER ROOT BALL TREE PVC LATERAL I.P.S. FLEX HOSE SCH 40 PVC TEE 1/2-INCH MALE ASSEMBLY, LENGTH VARIES I.P.S FLEX HOSE SWING 1/2-INCH 90-DEGREE ELBOW 1/2-INCH PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE PEA GRAVEL - 1/2" TO 3/4" FINISH GRADE-IN PLANTERS OR BOTTOM RAIN BIRD RWS-BG OR EQUAL (INCLUDES BUBBLER AND GRATE) ROOT WATERING SYSTEM: BUBBLER (0.25 GPM) PVC SCH 40 TEE LATERAL PIPE 4-INCH BASKET WEAVE CANISTER NPT INLET 12" 3" OF TREE GRATE IN TREE WELLS. DEEP ROOT WATERING SYSTEM NO SCALE 8 PIPE SLEEVE WITH 90 ELBOW NO SCALE 5 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE-DRIP NO SCALE 9 FINISH GRADE 2" 2" MAX. 2" GATE VALVE NO SCALE 2 QUICK COUPLER NO SCALE 4 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE NO SCALE 3 SPACING NOTE: AFTER ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER HAVE BEEN PLANTED, A PRE-EMERGENT SPRAY SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANTING AREAS PER MANAFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN ALL AREAS TREATED WITH PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE PRIOR TO PLANTING DUST THE PLANT PITS WITH ACTIVATED CARBON AT A RATE OF 50 LBS. PER 1000 SF BEFORE PLANTING ANY GROUNDCOVER. SPACING 12" MIN. VARIES STAKE TREES W/ (2), 2" THICK, 10' LODGEPOLE POSTS 24" 24"-36"ATTACH (2) DEEP ROOT "CINCH TIES" IN FIGURE 8 PATTERN 18" 5'-0" MIN. FROM PROPERTY LINE P/L TOP OF LINEAR ROOT BARRIER MUST BE AT LEAST 1/2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE SIDEWALK 24" DEPTH LINEAR ROOT BARRIER PANELS INSTALLED AT BACK OF CURB AND FACE OF SIDEWALK, CENTERED ON TREES, TYPICAL. NOTE: 1. INSTALL ROOT BARRIERS AT ALL TREES WITHIN 5' OF ALL CURBS, SIDEWALKS, ROADS OR BUILDINGS. CENTERED ON TREES. GROUNDCOVER SPACING NO SCALE 17 TREE/SHRUB PLANTING & STAKING NO SCALE 16 LINEAR ROOT BARRIER NO SCALE 18 SCH. 80 BALL VALVE BRICK (TYP. OF 4) MAIN SUPPLY LINE SCH. 80 NIPPLE SCH. 80 90° ELL-PVC MAIN LINE FITTING SCH. 80 NIPPLE PEA GRAVEL - 3" DEPTH MIN. SCH. 80 UNION FINISH GRADE CONTROL WIRE PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING COVER (WITHIN PLANTING AREAS) (CONCRETE BOX WITH REINFORCED LOCKING CONCRETE LID TO BE USED IN PAVED AREAS) ELECTRIC VALVE 2" PLASTIC 10" ROUND VALVE BOX WITH BOLT DOWN LOCK KIT IN PLANTER AREAS. (CONCRETE BOXES AND LIDS IN PAVED AREAS) 10"DIA. CLASS 160 SLEEVING PEA GRAVEL SUMP GATE VALVE MALE ADAPTER PVC PIPING VALVE. 150 MESH Y-FILTER. 25 PSI PRESSURE REGULATOR SCH 80 PVC UNION LATERAL LINE TO DRIP SYSTEM. BRICK SUPPORTS (4 COMMON BRICKS REQUIRED). PEA GRAVEL SUMP, MINIMUM 6" DEEP. NOTES: A. MIN. AND MAX. FLOW RATE - PER MANUFACTURER B. (*) PARTS IN DRIP ZONE KIT. RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX. VALVE LABEL FOR # ON CONTROLLER FINISH GRADE. CONTROL WIRES SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER. SCH 40 PVC ELL (SxS). SCH 40 PVC BALL VALVE (*). PVC MAINLINE CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROLLER. PVC MAINLINE FITTING. (*) PARTS IN DRIP ZONE KIT. FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MULCH QUICK-COUPLING VALVE LOCKING COVER PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH COVER &BOLT DOWN LOCK KIT:CARSON 910 IN PLANTERS (CONCRETE BOX AND LID IN PAVED AREAS) PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 3-INCH MINIMUM DEPTH OF PEA GRAVEL PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL BRICK (TYP. OF 3) PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) PVC SCH 40 STREET ELL PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC MAINLINE PIPE #4 REBAR WITH STAINLESS STEEL GEAR NOTE: CLAMPS 1. FITTINGS TO BE SAME SIZE AS QUICK COUPLING VALVE. EXTEND PVC 12" ABOVE FINISH GRADE AND CLOSE WITH ORANGE PAINTED END CAP. MAINLINE TO EXTEND 24" BEYOND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. TEMPORARY MARKER. TO BE REMOVED WHEN PIPE IS INSTALLED. 24" MIN. 24" MIN. SCH 40 PVC PIPE TOP OF SLEEVE TO BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 3" BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE ROAD BASE. TEMPORARY 90 DEG PVC ELBOW. TOP VIEW NOTES: 1. BUBBLERS ARE REQUIRED FOR TREES. TWO BUBBLERS PER TREE ARE TO BE PLACE ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF ROOTBALL. 2. USE PROPER RATED GLUE FOR I.P.S. FLEX HOSE. NOTE: THE MULCH SHALL NOT BE WITHIN 6" OF THE TRUNK OF THE TREE. ROOT BARRIER,TO BE INSTALLED WHEN TREE IS WITHIN 6' OF SIDEWALK OR CURB. SEE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS FOR INSTALLATION. TOP OF ROOTBALL @ 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE MULCH 4"-6" DEEP 4" BERM TO FORM WATERING BASIN FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH 1/4 HUMUS MINPROPERTY LINES FROM PATHS OR PLANT SPACING 18" 24" 30" 1 EA. 2 EA. 4 EA. (20-10-15) PLANT TABS AGRIFORM 12"X12" 1GAL PLANT PIT SIZES & PLANT TAB AMOUNTS MINIMUM PIT SIZE 5 GAL 18"X18" 24"X24" 15 GAL LIMIT OF PLANTING AREA CENTER OF GROUNDCOVER PLANT LG3.01 LANDSCAPE DETAILS ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE STAKING NO SCALE 12 MULCH INLINE DRIP EMITTER OUTLET TIE DOWN STAKE: WITH BEND (TYPICAL) FINISH GRADE COMPRESSION TEE NOTE: 1. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND, FOUR FEET IN LOAM AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY. 2. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION. ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE - DRIPLINE RISER ASSEMBLY NO SCALE 13NOTE: 1. PLACE TIE DOWN STAKES EVERY THREE FEET IN SAND, FOUR FEET IN LOAM AND FIVE FEET IN CLAY. 2. AT FITTINGS WHERE THERE IS A CHANGE OF DIRECTION SUCH AS TEES OR ELBOWS, USE TIE-DOWN STAKES ON EACH LEG OF THE CHANGE OF DIRECTION. BARB COUPLING 17X17MM MULCH ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE TIE DOWN STAKE: WITH BEND (TYPICAL) FINISH GRADE INLINE DRIP EMITTER OUTLET, SEE PLANS FOR DRIPLINE OUTLET SPACING BARB TEE 17X17X17MM PVC LATERAL SUPPLY HEADER PVC TEE SXSXT BLANK DRIP TUBING LENGTH AS REQUIRED BARB MALE ADAPTER: 17MM X 12" MPT / 17MM X 34" MPT BARB ELBOW 17X17MM ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE - END FEED LAYOUT NO SCALE 14 ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE - IRREGULAR SHAPED LAYOUT NO SCALE 15 PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP OR OPTIONAL PVC BALL VALVE PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER PERIMETER OF AREA FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP OR OPTIONAL BALL VALVE TIE-DOWN STAKES PVC DRIP MANIFOLD FROM VALVE (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND) PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS NOTE: 1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS AND CHANGES IN ELEVATION. SEE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS PER MANUFACTURER. 2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SPACING PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING OPERATION INDICATOR PERIMETER DRIPLINE PIPE TO BE INSTALLED 2"-4" FROM PERIMETER OF AREA ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE INSET A INSET A STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP PVC SCH 40 ELL PVC SCH 40 RISER PIPE PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER MALE ADAPTER INSERT MULCH DRIP MANIFOLD BURIAL DEPTH NOTE: 1. DISTANCE BETWEEN LATERAL ROWS AND EMITTER SPACING TO BE BASED ON SOIL TYPE, PLANT MATERIALS AND CHANGES IN ELEVATION. SEE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS PER MANUFACTURER. 2. LENGTH OF LONGEST DRIPLINE LATERAL SHOULD NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SPACING PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP OR OPTIONAL PVC BALL VALVE OPERATION INDICATOR PERIMETER DRIPLINE TO BE INSTALLED 2"-4" FROM PERIMETER OF AREA PVC SUPPLY PIPE FROM VALVE (SIZED TO MEET LATERAL FLOW DEMAND) ON-SURFACE DRIPLINE TIE-DOWN STAKES INSET A PVC SCH 40 ELL MALE ADAPTER INSERT PVC SUPPLY MANIFOLD PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER MULCH STAINLESS STEEL CLAMP INSET A PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING FLUSH POINT WITH PVC CAP OR OPTIONAL PVC BALL VALVE TOTAL LENGTH OF SELECTED DRIPLINE SHOULD NOT EXCEED LENGTH PER MANUFACTURER BARB X BARB INSERT TEE OR CROSS PRE-INSTALLED BARB FITTING PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER PREFABRICATED DRIPLINE HEADER PVC RISER PIPE PERIMETER OR AREA 12" MIN. 12" 12"
12" MIN. 12" VALVE BOX NO SCALE 69"X10" CIRCULAR VALVE BOX 14"X19" RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX 13" X 20" OR LARGER VALVE BOX SIDEWALK OR EDGE OF PAVING NOTES: 1. CENTER BOX OVER VALVE TO FACILITATE SERVICING VALVE. 2. SET BOXES 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE OR MULCH COVER IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA AND FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE IN TURF AREA. 3. SET VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY IN GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA WHERE POSSIBLE. INSTALL IN LAWN AREA ONLY IF GROUND COVER/SHRUB AREA DOES NOT EXIST ADJACENT TO LAWN. 4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE. 5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND VALVE BOX EDGES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF VALVE BOX SIDES. 6. VALVE BOXES SHALL HAVE BOLT DOWN LIDS WITH BOLTS INSTALLED. PIPE AND WIRE TRENCHING NO SCALE 7 RUN WIRING BENEATH AND BESIDE MAINLINE. TAPE AND BUDLE AT 10' INTERVALS. ALL SOLVENT WELD PLASTIC PIPING TO BE SNAKED IN TRENCH AS SHOWN. HARDSCAPE 24" MIN.
24" MIN.
12" MIN.
12"
24" 6" MIN. 4"-6" NOTES: 1. SLEEVE 24" BELOW ALL HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS WITH SCH. 40 PVC TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE WITHIN. 2. FOR PIPE AND WIRE BURIAL DEPTHS SEE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. SNAKE ALL PLASTIC PIPING IN TRENCHES FROM SIDE TO SIDE AS SHOWN, AT A 50' INTERVAL. TIE A 24" LOOP IN ALL WIRING AT CHANGES OF DIRECTION OF 30° OR GREATER. UNTIE AFTER ALL CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. PLAN VIEW SLEEVING UNDER HARDSCAPE MAINLINE LATERAL AND WIRING MAINLINE PIPE LATERAL PIPE LATERAL PIPE WIRING 1/2" PVC STREET ELLS (3) LATERAL PIPE LATERAL TEE OR ELL FINISH GRADE SCH 80 NIPPLE 12" POPUP BODY INDICATOR POP-UP PA-80 ADAPTER WITH SCHEDULE 40 THREADED CAP MULCH DRIP SYSTEM OPERATION INDICATOR NO SCALE 10 NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE THE OPERATION INDICATOR(S) IN AN INCONSPICUOUS LOCATION AS TO AVOID BEING VANDALIZED. 2. ONE PER DRIP VALVE STATION. 3. LOCATED WITHIN 8 FEET OF VALVE BOX. AIR RELIEF VALVE NO SCALE 11 FINISHED GRADE MULCH LOCKING VALVE BOX 12" AIR RELIEF VALVE TO BE INSTALLED AT HIGH POINTS IN DRIP ZONE PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTER POLYETHYLENE DISTRIBUTION TUBING BRICK (1 OF 2) PVC SCH 40 TEE 2" IN PLT. AREA, FLUSH IN TURF 3" MIN. STAKE WALL-MOUNTED CONTROLLER NO SCALE 1 18 GAUGE
WIRE. 2" DIAMETER RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FOR RCV WIRES. 12"X12"X4" STEEL JUNCTION BOX. GROUP WIRE BUNDLES AND SPLICE TO 18 GA. WIRES WITH TERMINAL STRIP AS PER SPECIFICATIONS. 2" DIAMETER RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FOR RCV WIRES. 12" DIAMETER RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FOR 110 VAC ELECTRICAL SOURCE. INSTALL PER LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES. CONTROLLER AS SPECIFIED. SECURELY BOLT CONTROLLER TO WALL. INSTALL BACKUP BATTERIES AS REQUIRED. GROUND AS PER MFG. SPECIFICATIONS. SET CONTROLLER 60" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BUILDING FINISH FLOOR 14 GAUGE WIRE
TO VALVES THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER REVISION BY DATE AS SHOWN City of Roseville Approval CITY APPROVAL STAMP SUTTER HEALTH C1009.00 PARKING GARAGE 12 EXPANSION 12 MEDICAL PLAZA ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 3 4 2 8 B r o o k s i d e R o a d , S t o c k t o n , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 2 1 9 2 0 9 - 9 4 3 - 2 0 2 1 w w w . s i e g f r i e d e n g . c o m F x : 2 0 9 - 9 4 2 - 0 2 1 4 CIVIL STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING PLANNING ATHLETIC FACILITY DESIGN 2/8/2022 3:10:00 PM f:\21projects\21052 roseville sutter mob\plans and graphics\entitlements\parking garage expansion\21052-PS2-LG3.01 LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg 3/28/2022 STOP
STOP
TS PO
B
B
B
OTS P
OTS P
B
B
STOP
STOP

STOP STOP

S POTS POT

STOP STOP
TS PO
TS PO
B
B
B
(E) MOB 4
(E) MOB 1
(E) MOB 8
(E) MOB 3
(E) MOB 5
(E) PARKING GARAGE
(E) MAIN HOSPITAL
(E) PARKING GARAGE 12

PROPOSED GARAGE EXPANSION

PROPERTY LINE

ACCESS EASEMENT,

SEE CIVIL

ACCESS EASEMENT,

SEE CIVIL

MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING

SCOPE IN SEPARATE
PERMIT

MEDICAL PLAZA

GENERAL NOTES

1. THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL (OR PATH OF

TRAVEL) IS A CONTINUOUS UNOBSTRUCTED

WALKWAY (OR PATH) CONNECTING ALL

ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS AND SPACES AS INDICATED
ON THIS SHEET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY

THAT A PERSON CAN NEGOTIATE THE ACCESSIBLE

ROUTE WITH A DISABILITY USING A WHEELCHAIR

AND THAT THE ROUTE IS ALSO SAFE AND USABLE
BY PERSONS WITH OTHER DISABILITIES.

2. ALL WALKS, SIDEWALKS AND LANDINGS THAT ARE

PART OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL SHALL

HAVE A CONTINUOUS COMMON SURFACE, NOT

INTERRUPTED BY STEPS OR BY ABRUPT CHANGES
IN LEVEL EXCEEDING 1/2 INCH, AND SHALL HAVE A
MINIMUM WIDTH OF 48 INCHES, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE. THE SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF
TRAVEL SHALL BE LESS THAN 1:20 (5%) WITH A
MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 1/4 INCH PER FOOT
(2%), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

3. ALL DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE RAMPS SHALL HAVE
A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1:12 (8.33%) IN THE

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL WITH A MAXIMUM CROSS
SLOPE OF 1/4 INCH PER FOOT (2%), UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.

4. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FULL EXTENT OF SITE
WORK IN THIS CONTRACT.

City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:27:49 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG1.10

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION

OVERALL SITE PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
1" = 40'-0"
OVERALL SITE PLAN 1
STOP
STOP
TS
PO
OTS P
OTS P
EL
STOP
TEL
TEL
TEL
EL
EL
EL
EL
STOP

STOP STOP
TS PO
B
B
B

STREET LEVEL RAMP
INO LEVEL 2 OF (E)

PARKING GARAGE
(E) MOB 3
(E) PLAZA

PARKING GARAGE

ENTRANCE/EXIT
(E) GENERATOR
STAIR
ELEV
MACH
ELEC
MECH
FIRE
(E) PARKING GARAGE 12

PROPOSED GARAGE EXPANSION

MEDICAL PLAZA
ELEC
TELE

STREET LEVEL RAMP DOWN
TO LEVEL 1 OF PARKING

GARAGE EXPANSION

PROPERTY LINE

ACCESS EASEMENT,

SEE CIVIL

ASSUMED

PROPERTY LINE

LONG TERM BIKE
STORAGE, TYP OF (24)

SHORT TERM BIKE
STORAGE - (2) EXISTING
TO BE RELOCATED & (4)

PROPOSED
FF 256.50'

MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING

SCOPE UNDER SEPARATE
PERMIT
(E) ACCESSIBLE PATH TO

PUBLIC WAY
2 0'-5"
21'-6".
10'-0" MIN.
10'-6"

FIRE SEPARATION

DISTANCE

ASSUMED

PROPERTLY LINE
66'-9
3/4".

City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:28:02 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG1.20

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION

ENLARGED SITE PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
1" = 20'-0"
ENLARGED SITE PLAN 1
UP
UP
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
GGR
RA
M
P
U
P
7 .
6 3
%
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
48'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
48'-0"
124'-0"
TELE
ELEC
ELEV

CONTROL
RM
2 4
'
-
0 "
STAIR 1
ELEV
STAIR 2
20 5
4 6
16 16
7 5
7 1
PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 3
18'-0"
24'-0"
14'-6" 5'-0" 14'-6"
24'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0"
24'-0"
18'-2" 2'-0" 18'-0"
24'-0 3/4"
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 3:03:35 PM C:\BIM\2021\Projects\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_tamatoNNB8P.rvt PG2.11

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 01 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 01-FLOOR PLAN
1 UP
DN
DN
UP
DN
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
GGR
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
48'-0"
12'-5"
15'-7"
48'-0"
124'-0"
TELE
ELEC
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
OPEN
DN
2 4
'
-
0 "
STAIR 2
STAIR 1
ELEV
20 5
15 15
16 8
8 2
2 1
PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 6
18'-0"
24'-0"
14'-0" 6'-0" 14'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
18'-0" 18'-0" 24'-1" 2'-0".
18'-0" 23'-11 1/8"
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 3:04:32 PM C:\BIM\2021\Projects\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_tamatoNNB8P.rvt PG2.21

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 02 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 02-FLOOR PLAN
1 UP
DN
UP
DN
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
GGR
48'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
48'-0"
124'-0"
TELE
ELEC
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
2 4
'
-
0 "
STAIR 2
STAIR 1
ELEV
21 15
15 16
8 4
8 2
1 PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 6
18'-0"
24'-0"
16'-0"
2'-0" 16'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
4 4
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:28:09 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG2.31

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 03 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 03-FLOOR PLAN
1 UP
DN
UP
DN
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
GGR
48'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
48'-0"
124'-0"
ELEC
411
TELE
412
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
2 4
'
-
0 "
STAIR
STAIR 1
ELEV
21 15
15 4
4 16
8 4
8 2
1 1
1 PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 6
2 2
18'-0"
24'-0"
16'-0"
2'-0" 16'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 3:05:55 PM C:\BIM\2021\Projects\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_tamatoNNB8P.rvt PG2.41

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 04 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 04-FLOOR PLAN
1 UP
DN
UP
DN
A
3 .
0 1
1 A
3 .
0 1
3 A
3 .
0 1
2 19
19 20
20 21
21 22
22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
A
3 .
0 2
3 A
3 .
0 2
2 A
3 .
0 2
1 GGR48'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
48'-0"
124'-0"
TELE
ELEC
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
RA
M
P
U
P
RA
M
P
U
P
2 4
'
-
0 "
STAIR 2
ELEV
21 13
13 4
4 8
4 7
STAIR 1
3 2
1 1
PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 6
18'-0"
24'-0"
16'-0"
2'-0" 16'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:28:13 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG2.51

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 05 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 05-FLOOR PLAN
1 DN
DN
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22 23
23 24
24 25
25 26
26 27
27 28
28 29
29 30
30 31
31 32
32 33
33 34
34 AA
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
EER
DDR
CCR
AAR
GGR
48'-0"
14'-0"
14'-0"
48'-0" 124'-0"
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 5
'
-
6 "
2 6
'
-
0 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 7
'
-
6 "
1 6
4 '
-
0 "
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
13 '-11
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
1 3
'
-
1 1
"
18'-0"
28'-0"
14'-0" 14'-0"
28'-0"
18'-0" 120'-0"
2 0
'
-
0 7
/
8 "
20 '-0
3/4
"
2 0
'
-
0 5
/
8 "
2 0
'
-
0 1
/
2 "
2 0
'
-
0 3/8
"
20 '
-
0 1/4
"
RA
M
P
D
N
RAM
P
D
N
RA
M
P
D
N
STAIR 2
STAIR 1
ELEV
21 13
13 9
4 11
7 1
PG3.10
____ _
2 PG3.10
____ _
P
G
3 .
2 0
2 P
G
3 .
3 0
2 P
G
3 .
2 0
1 P
G
3 .
3 0
1 P
G
3 .
2 0
3 P
G
3 .
3 0
3 6
18'-0"
24'-0"
16'-0"
2'-0" 16'-0"
24'-0"
18'-0"
City of Roseville Approval
NORTH

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 3:08:57 PM C:\BIM\2021\Projects\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_tamatoNNB8P.rvt PG2.61

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION
LEVEL 06 FLOOR PLAN
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
LEVEL 06-FLOOR PLAN
1 LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

AA BB CC DD EE FF GG

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"
6'-6" 11'-10" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4"
3'-9"3'-9"

TYPICAL MINIMUM HEIGHT

CLEARANCE PER FLOOR

LIGHT POLE
75'-0" MAX HEIGHT
8'-4"
75'-0"

STAIR TOWER
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"
6'-6" 11'-10" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4" 11'-4"

LIGHT POLE
75'-0" MAX HEIGHT

TYPICAL MINIMUM HEIGHT

CLEARANCE PER FLOOR
8'-4"
75'-0"

STAIR AND ELEVATOR
TOWERS
City of Roseville Approval

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
03/28/2022
3/29/2022 11:28:17 AM C:\Users\mwalsh\Documents\_Local Files\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_mwalshD33VZ.rvt PG3.10

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION

BUILDING SECTIONS
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
1/8" = 1'-0"
BUILDING SECTION 1
1 1/8" = 1'-0"
BUILDING SECTION 2
2 LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"
34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"
1 PG3.10
____
_

PROPOSED EXPANSION EXISTING GARAGE
2 PG3.10
____
_
3B
1B
3B
1B
1A
3A
2A
1A
3B
1B
3B
1B
5 1A
3B
1B
1A
3A
1A
3B
3A
3A
1A
2B
2B
2B
3A
2A
1A
2A 4
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

GG FF EE DD CC BB AA

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

DRIVEWAY ENTRY
3B
1B
3A
2B
3A
2A
1A
2B
3B
1B
1A
2A
1A
3A
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"
1 PG3.10
____
_

PROPOSED EXPANSION EXISTING GARAGE

DRIVEWAY ENTRY
2 PG3.10
____
_
3B
1B
3A
2B
2A
3A
1A
1A
1A
3B
1B
3A
1A
2B

EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - BEIGE

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - BEIGE

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - BROWN

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - BROWN

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - GREEN

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - GREEN

PAINTED METAL FINISH - CHARCOAL GRAY
1A
1B
2A
2B
3A
3B
4 5 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
City of Roseville Approval

THIS DRAWING IS NOT FINAL OR TO BE

USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS

SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

REVISION BY DATE

AS SHOWN

CITY APPROVAL STAMP
3/29/2022 3:18:44 PM C:\BIM\2021\Projects\C1009.00-Sutter Parking Garage 2 Expansion_A21_tamatoNNB8P.rvt 03/11/2022
PG3.20

SUTTER HEALTH
C1009.00
PARKING GARAGE 12

EXPANSION

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

BUILDING EXPANSION

ELEVATIONS
12 MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
3/32" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - NORTH 1
3/32" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - EAST 2
3/32" = 1'-0"
BUILDING ELEVATION - SOUTH 3

EXTERIOR FINISH LEGEND

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - BEIGE

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - BEIGE

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - BROWN

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - BROWN

PAINTED CONCRETE PANEL - GREEN

PAINTED EIFS FINISH - GREEN

PAINTED METAL FINISH - CHARCOAL GRAY
1A
1B
2A
2B
3A
3B
4 5 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"
34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"
1 PG3.10
____
_

PROPOSED EXPANSION EXISTING GARAGE
2 PG3.10
____
_
3B
1B
1B
3A
1A
3A
2A
1A
1B
3B
1B
5 1A
3B
1B
1A
3A
1A
3B
3A
3A
1A
2B
4 2B
2B
3A
2A
1A
1A
3A
3B
1B
2A
1A
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

STAIR TOWER
+325' - 0"

GG FF EE DD CC BB AA

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

ELEV TOWER
+331' - 6"

DRIVEWAY ENTRY
3B
1B
3A
2B
3A
2A
1A
2B
3B
1B
3A
2A
1A
1A
1B
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 01
+256' - 6"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 02
+267' - 10"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 03
+279' - 2"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 04
+290' - 6"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 05
+301' - 10"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"
LEVEL 06
+313' - 2"