Roseville City Council
August 17, 2022

regarding VMT analysis:
“Quantitative analysis would not be required if it can be demonstrated that a project is consistent with the General Plan and would generate VMT which is equivalent to or less than what was assumed in this General Plan EIR.”
Following the preparation of the General Plan Update and the accompanying City of Roseville General Plan Update Final EIR, the City’s travel demand model and VMT metrics were updated as part of the City’s Housing Element Update and accompanying Final Transportation Impact Study for the Roseville Housing Element Update (Fehr & Peers 2021). This effort was more than just a study of modifications in zoning for the Housing Element Update, which was adopted by the City Council on August 18, 2021 (City of Roseville 2021). Importantly, it accomplished the following:

1. Updated City of Roseville base year model to a February 2020 (pre-COVID) condition. Note that the prior model from the General Plan Update was validated to an approximately 2014-2016 condition.

2. Developed a new Year 2035 model.

3. Updated existing and Year 2035 citywide signalized intersection operating levels.

4. Updated the VMT per service population metrics.

Accordingly, the VMT impact analysis presented in the Final Transportation Impact Study for the Roseville Housing Element Update represents the most comprehensive and up-to-date VMT metrics for the City.

Page TI 16-22 of the January 2021 Amendments to the City of Roseville Design and Constructions Standards contains the following statements regarding VMT analysis:

Roseville Soccer Complex City of
Transportation Impact Study
2022 June
36 ing “A project may be screened from additional VMT analysis if it meets one or more of the follow criteria. These criteria are based on the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018).” The VMT generated by the project is within the scope of a – thin Scope of Prior CEQA Analysis Wi 1. prior CEQA analysis, and is therefore covered by a prior analysis, Prior analysis includes analysis performed for the General Plan.
- 50E, WB - he West Roseville Specific Plan area on parcels WB t The project site would be situated within , which have Park, Park (Sports Complex), and Light Industrial land use designations, -60B and WB 60E, presented VMT impact analysis the included in VMT associated with these planned uses were respectively. . lle Housing Element Update Final Transportation Impact Study for the Rosevi in the . that would be generated by the project site was estimated for two scenarios Total daily weekday VMT with the planned uses identified in the West would develop The first scenario assumes that the project site as proposed by would develop Roseville Specific Plan. The second scenario assumes that the project site site on a typical project Because this analysis focuses on VMT that would be generated by the the project. vehicle travel activity associated with evening practices that would occur weekday, this analysis considers complex. at the soccer on a typical weekday
ual, ITE Trip Generation Man using trip generation rates presented in the Daily vehicle trips were estimated 11th (for the planned Light Industrial uses), the City of Roseville Travel Demand model (for the Edition planned Park uses), and based on the anticipated users of the soccer complex (which would be comprised ten fields based on the proposed project). or rts Complex uses of six fields based on the planned Park Spo estimated by multiplying the total daily vehicle trips by the average then was otal daily weekday VMT T for each component. trip length
estimated using data presented in the were for the planned Light Industrial uses s verage trip length A This document estimated average trip lengths for . Draft EIR Administrative Roseville Industrial Park Project ville Industrial Park project site, which is the planned industrial park uses that would be present at the Rose mile northwest of the Roseville Soccer complex project site. Therefore, these - located approximately one vehicle trips generated by the of are comparable to those that would be expected average trip lengths at the project site. uses ntly planned Light Industrial curre the based on Average trip lengths for users of the Park and soccer complex uses were estimated within the Roseville and north Sacramento years old 5 to 17 geographic distribution of residents aged - data presented in the American Community Survey 2020 5 level - block group according to unty areas Co would represent the primary users . This method was selected because this demographic Year Estimates ccer complex uses. the Park and so and vehicle trip generators associated with !
37 Information provided by the City indicates that while the soccer complex would primarily serve local teams, it would also be utilized by the Placer United Soccer Club, which draws from the greater Placer County and northern Sacramento County areas. According to the City, the Placer United Soccer Club would utilize up to three fields for weekday evening practices. Accordingly, for the currently planned sixfield soccer complex, it is assumed that three fields would be utilized by the Placer United Soccer Club and three fields would be utilized by local teams. Moreover, for the proposed ten-field soccer complex, it is assumed that three fields would be utilized by the Placer United Soccer Club and seven fields would be utilized by local teams. Average trip lengths for trips associated with the Placer United Soccer Club practices were derived based on the geographic distribution of residents aged 5 to 17 years old in Roseville, Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Granite Bay, Antelope, Foothill Farms, Citrus Heights, Orangevale, Fair Oaks, Carmichael, North Highlands, Rio Linda, and Elverta and their respective travel distances to/from the project site. Average trip lengths for trips associated with local teams were derived based on the geographic distribution of residents aged 5 to 17 years old in Roseville only and their respective travel distances to/from the project site.

As shown in Table 5, the proposed project, if implemented, would result in a net decrease of 11,275 total daily weekday VMT when compared to the VMT that would be generated by the site if it were developed with its planned land uses. Accordingly, this impact would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None required.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
38 Table 5: Roseville Soccer Complex Project – Weekday Vehicle Miles Traveled Comparison Land Use Quantity Daily Vehicle Trips Daily VMT1
Planned Land Uses2
Park – Parcel WB-50E 3.1 acres 8 54
Park (Sports Complex) – Parcel WB-60A 6 fields3 2,870 22,3444 Industrial – Parcel WB-60B 30 acres (561.924 ksf)
5 2,3046 24,1927
Total 5,182 46,590
Proposed Roseville Soccer Complex Project
Roseville Soccer Complex 10 fields 4,800 35,3144
Total 4,800 35,314
Difference (Project Minus Planned)
Total -382 -11,275
Note: 1 Refer to technical appendix for detailed calculations. 2 Planned land uses represent those identified in the West Roseville Specific Plan. 3 Planned 25.2-acre sports complex would accommodate an estimated 6 fields. 4 Average trip lengths for trips derived based on the geographic distribution of residents aged 5 to 17 years old in Roseville, Rocklin, Lincoln, Loomis, Granite Bay, Antelope, Foothill Farms, Citrus Heights, Orangevale, Fair Oaks, Carmichael, North Highlands, Rio Linda, and Elverta based on US Census 2020 ACS data and their respective travel distances to/from the project site. In both scenarios, three fields would be utilized by the Placer United Soccer Club, which would draw from all of these communities. The remaining fields would be utilized by local teams and would draw from Roseville only. 5 Floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.43 derived from the proposed industrial park project analyzed in the Roseville Industrial Park EIR.
6 Trip generation based on trip rates from Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (ITE 2021). 7 Average trip length of 10.5 miles derived from the proposed industrial park project analyzed in the Roseville Industrial Park EIR.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

I- II-
+-
39 Impact 2: Impacts to bicycle facilities.

As shown on Figure 3, a continuous set of on-street and/or off-street bicycle facilities are present to connect the project site with surrounding neighborhoods. The project would not modify these existing bicycle facilities or implement new bicycle facilities. A bicyclist could ride on Class II bike lanes continuously from the project site along Westbrook Boulevard to Blue Oaks Boulevard, Pleasant Grove Boulevard, and beyond. Similarly, bicyclists could ride on the existing Class I shared-use path along Curry Creek to access the project site from various nearby residential communities such as Westpark. While the project site does not have continuous access to the City’s Class I off-street path system, City policies related to biking do not mandate this be present to achieve consistency with policies because continuous Class II bike lanes are provided to accommodate bicycle travel.

The project would not cause a physical disruption to existing bicycle facilities. Moreover, the project would not interfere with the implementation of planned bicycle facilities identified in the City’s General Plan, West Roseville Specific Plan, or Bicycle Master Plan.

Altogether, this impact would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None required.

Impact 3: Impacts to pedestrian facilities.

As shown on Figure 3, continuous pedestrian facilities are currently lacking on Westbrook Boulevard near the project site. In addition to constructing new pedestrian pathways internal to the project site, the project would include the construction of new sidewalks on the easterly side of Westbrook Boulevard along the project site frontage. However, sidewalk gaps would remain on the easterly side of Westbrook Boulevard between Blue Oaks Boulevard and Payson Avenue that would discourage people from walking to and from the project site. This would be inconsistent with General Plan policies CIRC6.1, CIRC6.3, and CIRC6.5, which call for establishing and maintaining a safe and continuous pedestrian network that encourages walking. It would not be possible to walk to and from the site via the easterly side of Westbrook Boulevard between Blue Oaks Boulevard and Payson Avenue via continuous sidewalks.

Instead, pedestrians would either walk in a grassy field, in a landscaped area, or in the Class II bike lane.

Roseville Soccer Complex City of
Transportation Impact Study
2022 June
40 The project would not cause a physical disruption to existing pedestrian facilities. Moreover, the project would not interfere with the implementation of planned pedestrian facilities identified in the City’s Roseville Specific Plan, or Pedestrian Master Plan. General Plan, West . significant , this impact would be Altogether
roject p acilities in the f edestrian p Construct 1. 3. Mitigation Measure . icinity v
in the shall construct the following pedestrian facilities City first day of operations, the its Prior to project vicinity:
foot length of sidewalk along the east side of Westbrook Boulevard 450- An approximate • s to connect with the existing sidewalk starting south of Blue Oak north the project site from Boulevard.
foot length of sidewalk along the east side of Westbrook Boulevard 700- An approximate • to connect with the existing sidewalk starting north of Payson from the project site south . Avenue
dewalks may already be constructed by of the above missing si one or both It is conceivable that the time that the project would open. If that is the case, then no additional pedestrian shall City improvements would be necessary. However, if they are not yet in place, then the ld be either permanent or temporary. construct the improvements, which cou Significance after Mitigation
level significant - than - less would reduce this impact to a 2.1 Implementation of Mitigation Measure because construction of sidewalks in the areas specified is considered feasible and would lead to consistency with adopted City policies, plans, or programs regarding pedestrian facilities. . Impacts to transit service and facilities : 4 Impact
. is not currently provided within the project site vicinity bus service route - , fixed As described previously demand transit service to the study area, including the - Ride service provides on -a- Dial Roseville Transit project site.
nd Westbrook Boulevard at Farside bus turnouts are currently present on both northbound and southbou the , the project would include Moreover Brookstone Drive South to accommodate future bus service. buses and shuttle associated site parking lots to accommodate - provision of bus parking within the on ts. with tournaments and other even
!
41 The project would not cause a physical disruption to existing transit service or facilities. The project would not interfere with the implementation of planned transit service or facilities identified in the City’s General Plan, the West Roseville Specific Plan, or the City of Roseville Short Range Transit Plan.

Altogether, this impact would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None required.

Impact 5: Hazards impacts.

The project would modify the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections. The proposed intersection modifications would adhere to applicable City of Roseville roadway design standards.

Several emergency services are located within the project area. Roseville Fire Station #9 is situated on Hayden Parkway approximately 1.5 miles from the project site and future Fire Station #11 would be located to the north of the project site (in the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan area). Roseville Police headquarters are located at 1051 Junction Boulevard. Roseville’s existing roadway and transportation network provides accessibility for fire, police, and other emergency service providers. Additionally, traffic signals in the City include emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment that would allow emergency responders to turn the signal green, allowing for efficient access to the scene. The project would not create roadway and transportation facilities that impede access for emergency response vehicles. Thus, the project would not result in inadequate emergency access.

Altogether, this impact would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
None required.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
42 7. Traffic Operations Analysis
This chapter presents an analysis of the potential effects of the project with respect to traffic operations (i.e., vehicle delay and LOS) on roadway facilities within the vicinity of the project site.

Analysis Scenarios
The following scenarios are analyzed in this study:
• Near-Term No Project Conditions – Establishes the baseline setting from which project-specific traffic operations effects are measured. This scenario assumes the completion of numerous nearterm land use and transportation system changes (refer to “Travel Demand Forecasting” section below for details).
• Near-Term Plus Project Conditions – Adds changes to travel demand, roadway geometrics, etc. that would result from buildout of the proposed project to Near-Term Conditions. • Cumulative No Project Conditions - Represents cumulative travel demand based on reasonably foreseeable local and regional land use and transportation system changes. For the purposes of this study, the cumulative year is 2035. This scenario assumes the project site is developed consistent with the planned land uses identified in the West Roseville Specific Plan. • Cumulative Plus Project Conditions – Adds changes to travel demand, roadway geometrics, etc. that would result from buildout of the proposed project to Cumulative No Conditions.

Traffic operations analyses were performed for each of these scenarios during weekday PM peak hour (4:30 PM to 5:30 PM) and Saturday AM peak hour (10:15 AM to 11:15 AM) conditions. These time periods were selected for analysis purposes because they would experience the greatest levels of project travel activity (i.e., due to weekday evening practices and weekend tournaments). Traffic operations analyses were not performed during weekday AM peak hour conditions because the project would be expected to generate a nominal number of vehicle trips during this time period.

Saturday AM peak hour conditions represent conditions during which a local/semi-regional tournament would be held at the project site. Analysis of a local/semi-regional tournament was selected instead of analysis of a regional/national tournament due to its higher trip generation potential and to avoid understating the potential effects of the project on traffic operations. 43 Analysis Methodology
This section describes the methods utilized to analyze roadway traffic operations within the study area.

Analysis Locations
The following six study intersections were selected for analysis based on the project’s expected travel characteristics (i.e., the project location and amount of project trips) as well as their susceptibility to being affected by the project:

1. Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard

2. Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westpark Drive

3. Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway

4. Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North

5. Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South

6. Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard
Study intersections 4 and 5 would serve as the primary vehicular access points for the project site.

Data Collection
Existing intersection turning movement data was derived at the study intersections as follows:
• Weekday evening (4 PM to 6 PM) peak period
o Traffic counts were conducted at study intersections 1 through 3 on Tuesday, August 17, 2021 and at study intersections 4 and 5 on Thursday, January 27, 2022. o Intersection turning movement data at study intersection 6 on Tuesday, August 17, 2021 was obtained from the City of Roseville Turning Movement Volume/Occupancy Report online database.
• Saturday morning (10 AM to 12 PM) peak period
o Traffic counts were conducted at study intersections 1 through 5 on Saturday, March 19, 2022.
o Intersection turning movement data at study intersection 6 on Saturday, March 19, 2022 was obtained from the City of Roseville Turning Movement Volume/Occupancy Report online database.

Additionally, Fehr & Peers conducted a site visit in April 2022 to document of existing intersection geometrics, lane configurations, traffic controls, etc. at the six study intersections. At present, study intersections 1 through 5 are all-way stop-controlled and study intersection 6 is signalized.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
44 Travel Demand Forecasting
Because the analysis scenarios consider future land use and transportation system changes, it was necessary to conduct travel demand forecasting to determine near-term and cumulative peak hour traffic volumes at the six study intersections. This process is described below.

Near-Term Conditions
Near-term conditions reflect the land use growth associated with near-term development activity anticipated for the specific plans presented in Table 6. These land use quantities were developed in consultation with City staff as part of the Blue Oaks Boulevard Phasing Analysis (Fehr & Peers November 2021). As shown, 6,460 new dwelling units and about 200,000 square feet of retail would be added under near-term conditions.

Table 6: Near-Term Land Use Absorption
Land Use
Category
Creekview
Specific Plan
West
Roseville
Specific Plan
Regional
University
Specific Plan
Sierra Vista
West Specific
Plan
Sierra Vista
East Specific
Plan
Amoruso
Ranch
Specific Plan
SF Res (du’s) 1,000 1,732 0 1,150 478 481
MF Res (du’s) 210 1,057 0 150 200 0
Retail (ksf) 0 82 0 125 0 0
Office (ksf) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Industrial (ksf) 0 0 0 0 0 0
School (students) 0 450 0 0 0 0
Source: Blue Oaks Boulevard Phasing Analysis Technical Memorandum (Fehr & Peers, 2021).

Additionally, near-term conditions include the completion of the following major roadway system modifications in the study area:
• Extension of Westbrook Boulevard north to Sunset Boulevard West and south to Baseline Road (two lanes north of Blue Oaks Boulevard and four lanes south of Blue Oaks Boulevard). • Extension of Santucci Boulevard between Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Baseline Road (four lanes).
• Extension of Market Street between Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Baseline Road (two lanes). • Extension of Upland Drive between Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Baseline Road (two lane). + + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
+ + +
45 The existing lane configurations on Westbrook Boulevard and Blue Oaks Boulevard and existing traffic controls and intersection geometries at the six study intersections were assumed to remain as-is under near-term conditions.

The near-term land uses and transportation system changes were added to the City of Roseville modified 2021 base year model. The model was then run and weekday PM peak hour traffic forecasts were developed for the six study intersections.

Near-term Saturday AM peak hour traffic forecasts were estimated by adjusting the near-term weekday PM peak hour traffic forecasts based on the existing ratio of Saturday AM peak hour to Weekday PM peak hour traffic volumes at the six study intersections as well as at the nearby Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Market Street intersection.

Near-Term Plus Project traffic forecasts were estimated by assigning the project trips to the study intersections in accordance with the project travel characteristics presented in Chapter 4 and adding project trips to the Near-Term No Project traffic forecasts. Additionally, the intersection geometrics and lane configurations at both Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections were modified in accordance with the modifications proposed on the project site plan.

Cumulative Conditions
Cumulative conditions reflect the reasonably foreseeable local and regional land use and transportation system changes that would be present in 2035. These changes are consistent with the City’s “Updated 2035 Model”, as documented in the technical memorandum entitled Updated Roseville 2035 Model VMT and LOS Results (Fehr & Peers April 2022). These cumulative land use and transportation system changes reflect the “Project Scenario” from the City’s Housing Element Update, plus various recently proposed projects both within and outside of the City of Roseville such as the Roseville Industrial Park and the Parcel 55a/60 Rezone.

The cumulative conditions transportation system includes the following key modifications to the study intersections and roadway facilities:
• Widening of Westbrook Boulevard south of Blue Oaks Boulevard to six lanes. • Widening of Blue Oaks Boulevard between the westerly city limits and Fiddyment Road to six lanes.
• Signalization of the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westpark Drive, Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway, Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North, and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
46 Outputs from the “Updated 2035 Model” were used to derive cumulative weekday PM peak hour traffic forecasts for the six study intersections. Cumulative Saturday AM peak hour traffic forecasts were estimated using similar methods to those described above for near-term conditions.

Cumulative Plus Project traffic forecasts were estimated by assigning the project trips to the study intersections in accordance with the project travel characteristics presented in Chapter 4 and adding project trips to the Cumulative No Project traffic forecasts. Additionally, the intersection geometrics and lane configurations at both Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections were modified in accordance with the modifications proposed on the project site plan. Because these intersections would be signalized under cumulative conditions, it was assumed that a southbound left-turn pocket would be provided at both intersections to complement the existing northbound left-turn pocket and to enable protected left-turn signal phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches.

Roadway System Operations
This study analyzes roadway operating conditions using intersection level of service (LOS) as a primary measure of operational performance. Motorized vehicle LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic flow from the perspective of motorists and is an indication of the comfort and convenience associated with driving.

Typical factors that affect motorized vehicle LOS include speed, travel time, traffic interruptions, and freedom to maneuver. Empirical LOS criteria and methods of calculation have been documented in the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Science (Transportation Research Board, 2016). The HCM defines six levels of service ranging from LOS A (representing free-flow vehicular traffic conditions with little to no congestion) to LOS F (oversaturated conditions where traffic demand exceeds capacity resulting in long queues and delays). The LOS definitions and calculations contained in the HCM are the prevailing measurement standard used throughout the United States and are used in this study. Motorized vehicle LOS definitions for signalized and unsignalized intersection are discussed below.

The LOS at signalized intersections is based on the average control delay (i.e., delay resulting from initial deceleration, queue move-up time, time stopped on an intersection approach, and final acceleration) experienced per vehicle traveling through the intersection. Table 7 summarizes the relationship between delay and LOS for signalized intersections.

Similar to signalized intersections, the HCM 6th Edition methodology for stop-controlled intersections reports the LOS based on the control delay experienced by motorists traveling through the intersection.

As shown in Table 8, the delay ranges for stop-controlled intersections are lower than for signalized intersections. The HCM anticipates that motorists expect signalized intersections to carry higher traffic 47 volume that results in greater delay than a stop-controlled intersection. Stop controls are associated with more uncertainty as delays are less predictable, which can reduce users’ delay tolerance.

Traffic operations for study intersections 1 through 3 and 6 were analyzed using Synchro 11 traffic operations analysis software. Traffic operations for study intersections 4 and 5 were analyzed using the SimTraffic micro-simulation module of the Synchro 11 software, which accounts for interactions between intersections, queue spillback, vehicle platooning, etc. SimTraffic also produces more accurate estimates of vehicular queuing (when compared to more deterministic methods).

Table 7: Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of
Service Description Average Control Delay1
A Volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or cycle length is very short. ≤ 10
B Volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A. >10 to 20
C
Progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping.
>20 to 35
D Volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long.

Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >35 to 55 E Volume-to-capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55 to 80
F Volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80
Note: 1 Average control delay presented in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are rounded to the nearest second and evaluated for LOS based on the above thresholds (i.e., 10 seconds per vehicle = LOS A).

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016.

Table 8: Stop-Controlled Intersection LOS Criteria
Level of Service Average Control Delay1
A ≤ 10
B >10 to 15
C >15 to 25
D >25 to 35
E >35 to 50
F >50
Note: 1 Average control delay presented in seconds per vehicle. Delay values are rounded to the nearest second and evaluated for LOS based on the above thresholds (i.e., 10 seconds per vehicle = LOS A).

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2016. +-
t
+-
+-
+
+
+
+
+
City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
48 Roadway Operations Performance Criteria
City of Roseville General Plan Circulation Element Policy CIRC2.1 requires that the City maintain a LOS C standard at a minimum of 70 percent of all signalized intersections and roadway segments in the City during the AM and PM peak. Exceptions to the LOS C standard may be considered where improvements required to achieve the standard would adversely affect pedestrian, bicycle, or transit access, and where feasible LOS improvements and travel-demand-reducing strategies have been exhausted.

Near-Term No Project Conditions
Table 9 presents the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour vehicle delay and LOS for each study intersection under Near-Term No Project Conditions. As shown, all study intersections would operate at acceptable LOS C or better with the exception of the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersection, which would operate at LOS F during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour.

Table 9: Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Near-Term No Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control Peak Hour
Near-Term No Project
Conditions
Delay LOS

1. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westbrook Blvd. AWSC
Weekday PM 22 C
Saturday AM 12 B

2. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westpark Dr. AWSC
Weekday PM 20 C
Saturday AM 13 B

3. Blue Oaks Blvd./Hayden Pkwy. AWSC
Weekday PM 193 F
Saturday AM 67 F

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North AWSC
Weekday PM 8 A
Saturday AM 8 A

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South AWSC
Weekday PM 7 A
Saturday AM 7 A

6. Westbrook Blvd./Pleasant Grove Blvd. AWSC
Weekday PM 21 C
Saturday AM 20 C
Note: For signalized and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC), average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches with the delay and LOS for the worst-case movement reported in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.
t
t t
+-
t
t t
t
t t
49 While this study does not include a near-term analysis of weekday AM peak hour conditions, such an analysis was prepared as part of Blue Oaks Boulevard Widening Analysis. This analysis revealed that the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westpark Drive, and Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersections would operate at unacceptable LOS E, LOS D, and LOS F, respectively, under near-term weekday AM peak hour conditions. The Blue Oaks Boulevard Widening Analysis recommended the following improvements to improve operations to acceptable levels:
• Signalize the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection and maintain the existing lane configurations.
• Convert the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westpark Drive intersection from all-way to side-street stop control and maintain the existing lane configurations.
• Signalize the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersection and widen the eastbound and westbound approaches to each consist of a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through-right lane.

These recommendations would similarly apply under Near-Term No Project conditions for this study.

Near-Term Plus Project Conditions
Table 10 presents the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour vehicle delay and LOS for each study intersection under Near-Term Plus Project Conditions. As shown, the project would increase delays at all study intersections during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour. Moreover, the project would degrade operations at the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard and Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersections from acceptable LOS C to unacceptable LOS D during the weekday PM peak hour and would exacerbate unacceptable LOS F conditions at the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersection during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour. The Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections serving the project site would both operate at acceptable LOS B or better during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour.

The intersection traffic control and lane configuration improvements described previously under NearTerm No Project conditions would improve operations at the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard, Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway, and Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersections to acceptable LOS C or better (see Table 11).

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
50 While the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections would comply with the City’s LOS policy, both intersections would meet the peak hour signal warrant (CAMUTCD Warrant 3B) during the Saturday AM peak hour under Near Term Plus Project conditions. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections be signalized prior to the commencement of operations at the project site. Signalization of these intersections is planned by the City and included in the City’s CIP. Additional benefits associated with signalization of these intersections include improved pedestrian crossings across Westbrook Boulevard to/from the project site and improved access for motorists turning onto Westbrook Boulevard from Brookstone Drive.

Given the existing eastbound approach lane configurations and the project’s proposed westbound approach lane configurations at both the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections, with the signalization of these intersections, it is anticipated that the eastbound and westbound approaches would operate with split phasing at both intersections. In light of the eastbound and westbound split phase operations, the following modifications are recommended to maximize operational efficiency at these two intersections:
• Eliminate the marked crosswalk on the south leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection. Note that a sidewalk is not present along the southerly side of Brookstone Drive North west of Westbrook Boulevard. Thus, the south leg crossing would provide limited benefit to pedestrian connectivity when the intersection is signalized. • Eliminate the marked crosswalk on the north leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersection. Note that a sidewalk is not present along the northerly side of Brookstone Drive South west of Westbrook Boulevard. Thus, the north leg crossing would provide limited benefit to pedestrian connectivity when the intersection is signalized. 51 Table 10: Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Near-Term Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control Peak Hour
Near-Term No
Project Conditions
Near-Term Plus
Project Conditions
Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westbrook Blvd. AWSC
Weekday PM 22 C 39 E
Saturday AM 12 B 20 C

2. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westpark Dr. AWSC
Weekday PM 20 C 56 F
Saturday AM 13 B 23 C

3. Blue Oaks Blvd./Hayden Pkwy. AWSC
Weekday PM 193 F 321 F
Saturday AM 67 F 177 F

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North AWSC
Weekday PM 8 A 13 B
Saturday AM 8 A 11 B

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South AWSC
Weekday PM 7 A 10 B
Saturday AM 7 A 10 A

6. Westbrook Blvd./Pleasant Grove Blvd. AWSC
Weekday PM 21 C 33 C
Saturday AM 20 C 25 C
Note: For signalized and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC), average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches with the delay and LOS for the worst-case movement reported in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Table 11: Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Near-Term Plus Project Conditions With Improvements
Intersection Traffic
Control Peak Hour
Near-Term Plus
Project Conditions
Near-Term Plus
Project Conditions
With
Improvements
Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westbrook Blvd. AWSC/
Signal
Weekday PM 28 D 29 C
Saturday AM 20 C 19 C

2. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westpark Dr. AWSC/
SSSC
Weekday PM 29 D 2 (30) A (D)
Saturday AM 23 C 1 (22) A (C)

3. Blue Oaks Blvd./Hayden Pkwy. AWSC/
Signal
Weekday PM 255 F 35 C
Saturday AM 177 F 24 C
Note: For signalized and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC), average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches with the delay and LOS for the worst-case movement reported in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.
+
+- +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
52 Table 12 displays the estimated 95th percentile queues for critical movements at the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections serving the project site. These include the northbound right-turn and southbound left-turn ingress movements as well as the westbound shared through-left and right-turn egress movements. The 95th percentile queues would be accommodated within the available storage. However, because the southbound left-turn movements would occur from the southbound shared through-left lane, queues associated with these movements would disrupt southbound through traffic on Westbrook Boulevard.

Table 12: Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Estimates – Near-Term Plus Project Conditions Intersection Movement Storage (ft.) Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (ft.)

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North
NB RT 220
Weekday PM 75
Saturday AM 100
SB TH/LT >1,000 Weekday PM 125
Saturday AM 100
WB TH/LT >350
Weekday PM 125
Saturday AM 125
WB RT 240
Weekday PM 50
Saturday AM 50

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South
NB RT 220
Weekday PM 75
Saturday AM 75
SB TH/LT 820
Weekday PM 100
Saturday AM 75
WB TH/LT >500
Weekday PM 75
Saturday AM 75
WB RT 115 Weekday PM 50
Saturday AM 50
Note: Results shown estimated from SimTraffic micro-simulation analysis of 10 simulation runs. Queue lengths are rounded up to nearest 25 feet.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.
t-
+ + + + + t
-~
53 The following improvements are recommended to reduce the adverse effects associated with the southbound left-turn queues at the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections:
• At both the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections, construct a southbound left-turn pocket with a storage length of 250 feet. These modifications would be consistent with Detail ST-10 (Four-Lane Arterial Single LeftTurns) of the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards. Moreover, these modifications would be consistent with Section 5-6 of the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, which states that “on arterials and expressways and where left turns in will be permitted, a left turn deceleration lane shall be provided.” Finally, these modifications would be consistent with those anticipated to be required under Cumulative Plus Project conditions. Because these intersections would be signalized under cumulative conditions, it is assumed that a southbound left-turn pocket would be needed at both intersections to complement the existing northbound left-turn pocket and to enable protected left-turn signal phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches.

Cumulative No Project Conditions
Table 13 presents the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour vehicle delay and LOS for each study intersection under Cumulative No Project Conditions. As shown, all study intersections would operate at acceptable LOS C or better with the exception of the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection, which would operate at LOS D during the weekday PM peak hour.

These results are consistent with those presented for the cumulative conditions analysis in the Updated Roseville 2035 Model VMT and LOS Results technical memorandum. This analysis determined that the total number of intersections throughout the City operating at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour would be consistent with the City’s associated LOS policy. The same conclusion applies to Cumulative No Project conditions for this study.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
54 Table 13: Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Cumulative No Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control Peak Hour
Cumulative No Project
Conditions
Delay LOS

1. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westbrook Blvd. Signal Weekday PM 50 D Saturday AM 23 C

2. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westpark Dr. Signal Weekday PM 5 A
Saturday AM 5 A

3. Blue Oaks Blvd./Hayden Pkwy. Signal Weekday PM 25 C
Saturday AM 17 B

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North Signal Weekday PM 9 A Saturday AM 4 A

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South Signal Weekday PM 6 A Saturday AM 6 A

6. Westbrook Blvd./Pleasant Grove Blvd. Signal Weekday PM 32 C Saturday AM 21 C
Note: For signalized and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC), average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches with the delay and LOS for the worst-case movement reported in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Cumulative Plus Project Conditions
Table 14 presents the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour vehicle delay and LOS for each study intersection under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. As shown, the project would increase delays at all study intersections during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour. Moreover, the project would degrade operations at the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection from acceptable LOS C to unacceptable LOS D during the weekday PM peak hour and would exacerbate unacceptable LOS D to LOS E at the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection during the weekday PM peak hour. The Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections serving the project site would both operate at acceptable LOS B or better during both the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday AM peak hour. t
t t
+-
t
t t
t
t t
t
55 Table 14: Peak Hour Intersection Operations – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic
Control Peak Hour
Cumulative No
Project Conditions
Cumulative Plus
Project Conditions
Delay LOS Delay LOS

1. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westbrook Blvd. Signal Weekday PM 50 D 73 E Saturday AM 23 C 27 C

2. Blue Oaks Blvd./Westpark Dr. Signal Weekday PM 5 A 5 A Saturday AM 5 A 5 A

3. Blue Oaks Blvd./Hayden Pkwy. Signal Weekday PM 25 C 26 C Saturday AM 17 B 17 B

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North Signal Weekday PM 9 A 29 C Saturday AM 4 A 18 B

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South Signal Weekday PM 6 A 18 B Saturday AM 6 A 16 B

6. Westbrook Blvd./Pleasant Grove Blvd. Signal Weekday PM 32 C 70 E Saturday AM 21 C 33 C
Note: For signalized and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches. For side-street stop-controlled intersections (SSSC), average intersection delay is reported in seconds per vehicle for all approaches with the delay and LOS for the worst-case movement reported in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

While the project would degrade operations at the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection, this degradation would not constitute an inconsistency with the City’s LOS policy, as this intersection already would not operate at LOS C or better under Cumulative No Project conditions.

However, the project-related degradation of operations at the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection would increase the number of intersections throughout the City that would not operate at LOS C or better conditions relative to Cumulative No Project conditions. The following improvements would improve operations at the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection to acceptable LOS C or better conditions:
• Modify the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection signal equipment and signal timing plan to operate with an overlap phase for the westbound right-turn phase (i.e., would operate concurrently with southbound left-turn).

Note that this would require prohibiting southbound u-turns. While there are a pair of right-turn only intersections to the north (i.e., at Symphony Avenue and Youngtown Avenue), they are not likely generating much u-turn demand at this location due to the neighborhoods connecting to the signalized Westbrook Boulevard/Octave Avenue/Payson Avenue intersection 700 feet to the north). + +
+ ..
+ +
+ ..
+ ..
+ ..
+ +
+ ..
+ ..
+ ..
+ +
City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
56 As described previously, it is anticipated that under Cumulative Plus Project conditions, both the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections would need to be modified to include a southbound left-turn pocket. These modifications would be needed at both intersections (which are planned for signalization under cumulative conditions) to complement the existing northbound left-turn pocket and to enable protected left-turn signal phasing for the northbound and southbound approaches.

Given the existing eastbound approach lane configurations and the project’s proposed westbound approach lane configurations at both the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections, it is anticipated that the eastbound and westbound approaches would operate with split phasing at both intersections. In light of the eastbound and westbound split phase operations, the following modifications are recommended to maximize operational efficiency at these two intersections:
• Eliminate the marked crosswalk on the south leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection. Note that a sidewalk is not present along the southerly side of Brookstone Drive North west of Westbrook Boulevard. Thus, the south leg crossing would provide limited benefit to pedestrian connectivity when the intersection is signalized under cumulative conditions. • Eliminate the marked crosswalk on the north leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersection. Note that a sidewalk is not present along the northerly side of Brookstone Drive South west of Westbrook Boulevard. Thus, the north leg crossing would provide limited benefit to pedestrian connectivity when the intersection is signalized under cumulative conditions.

Table 15 displays the estimated 95th percentile queues for critical movements at the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections serving the project site. These include the northbound right-turn and southbound left-turn ingress movements as well as the westbound shared through-left and right-turn egress movements. The 95th percentile queues would be accommodated within the available storage, with the exception of the 95th percentile queue for the southbound left-turn movement at the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection, which would reach a distance of 275 feet during the weekday PM peak hour. As described previously, it is recommended that the marked crosswalk on the north leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection be eliminated to maximize the operational efficiency of the intersection. Implementation of this recommendation would reduce the length of the southbound left-turn movement 95th percentile queue to a length less than the available storage of 240 feet. 57 Table 15: Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue Estimates – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Intersection Movement Storage (ft.) Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue (ft.)

4. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. North
NB RT 220
Weekday PM 125
Saturday AM 125
SB LT 240
Weekday PM 275
Saturday AM 150
WB TH/LT >350
Weekday PM 175
Saturday AM 200
WB RT 240
Weekday PM 75
Saturday AM 50

5. Westbrook Blvd./Brookstone Dr. South
NB RT 220
Weekday PM 75
Saturday AM 75
SB LT 240
Weekday PM 100
Saturday AM 100
WB TH/LT >500
Weekday PM 100
Saturday AM 150
WB RT 115 Weekday PM 50
Saturday AM 50
Note: Results shown estimated from SimTraffic micro-simulation analysis of 10 simulation runs. Queue lengths are rounded up to nearest 25 feet.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.
+ + +
City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
58 8. Project Site Parking, Access, and
Circulation
This section site provides a review of project site parking, access, and circulation.

Parking Demand and Supply
The project’s expected Saturday peak parking demand is expected to be similar to what was observed at the Rick Hitch Tournament and Placer United Girls Cup. The data collection at the Rick Hitch Tournament included on-site parking occupancy measurements. Through review of 15-minute arrival and departure traffic flows at the Placer United Girls Cup, peak parking demand was calculated. Table 16 indicates that the peak parking demand at each tournament was about 80 spaces per field.

The two tournaments had nearly identical parking demand rates despite having different tournament profiles. Although the Placer Girls Cup consisted of a greater proportion of teams traveling from more remote destinations (i.e., likely traveling in fewer vehicles), this may have been offset by greater percentages of attendees at the Rick Hitch Tournament departing and then arriving again between games.

This data suggests that the proposed project would have a peak parking demand of about 800 parking spaces. Since over 950 on-site parking spaces would be provided, the supply of parking appears adequate to meet the projected demand during weekend soccer tournaments.

Table 16: Saturday Parking Rates at Soccer Tournaments
Soccer Tournament Occupied Fields
Peak Parking Demand
Occupied Parking
Spaces Parking Demand Rate
Rick Hitch Tournament at Maidu
Regional Park1 5 397 80 spaces/field
Placer United Girls Cup at Cherry
Island Soccer Complex2 10 822 81 spaces/field
Note: 1 Observations on Saturday, August 15, 2015. Peak parking demand occurred at 2 PM. 2 Observations on Saturday, October 24, 2015. Peak parking demand occurred at 10:15 AM.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2015.
!
t t
59 Driveway Throat Depths
As described previously, the 95th percentile queues for critical movements at the two Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections were analyzed to determine the extent to which available storage would adequately accommodate peak hour queues. These movements included the westbound movements, which represent vehicles utilizing the outbound driveways from the project’s two on-site parking lots. As shown in Tables 12 and 15, the available storage proposed for these westbound movements would adequately accommodate the weekday PM and Saturday AM peak hour 95th percentile queues under both Near-Term Plus Project and Cumulative Plus Project conditions.

As described previously, the City anticipates that parking fees would not be collected on-site during tournaments. This would eliminate the need for vehicles to stop upon entering the project parking lots to complete a parking transaction via cash, credit card, etc. This would also eliminate queueing associated with inbound vehicles that could otherwise spill back towards or onto Westbrook Boulevard.

Altogether, the proposed driveway (i.e., westbound approach) throat depths at the two Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections would adequately accommodate queuing associated with inbound and outbound vehicles.

Phillip Road Access
The project proposes to provide outbound-only access from the northerly parking lot via Phillip Road.

However, it is conceivable that some visitors traveling to the soccer complex attempt to enter the project site via Phillip Road. This could be due to a variety of reasons, including a lack of awareness of the proposed access restriction or a visitor following route recommendations provided by a mobile device navigation app (see screenshot below of Google Maps route recommendation to utilize Phillip Road for a trip beginning in Lincoln and ending at the project site).

Vehicles attempting to enter the project site via Phillip Road would not be aware of the access restriction until they approach the Phillip Road project driveway and see that they are unable to enter the site at this location. Vehicles would then be required to complete a multi-point turn to travel eastbound on Phillip Road to locate an alternate access option. Given that the width of Phillip Road measures approximately 20 feet at this location, such a maneuver would cause temporary blockages of Phillip Road.

Additionally, Phillip Road would be an attractive parking option for visitors approaching the project site from the east who would prefer to avoid traveling to and utilizing one of the two proposed on-site parking lots (i.e., due to the reduced travel time associated with traveling to Phillip Road versus traveling to the on-site parking lots). The existing Roseville Energy Park gravel parking lot located on the north side of Phillip Road would also be an attractive parking option for project visitors for similar reasons. Use of City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
60 these facilities for project parking activity is not recommended due to the narrow roadway width, the lack of on-street parking facilities, and the lack of sidewalks on Phillip Road. The lack of sidewalks is particularly important to note as this would result in the mixing of pedestrians and vehicles in the Phillip Road travel lanes, which would increase the potential for conflicts involving pedestrians.

The following strategies and modifications are recommended:
• In informational materials related to the soccer complex, tournaments, etc., provide clear information regarding project site access and parking options. In particular, this information should state that ingress via Phillip Road and on-street parking on Phillip Road are not permitted. • Install the following signage:
o “No Parking” signage on both sides of Phillip Road between the project site and Westpark Drive,
o “No Soccer Complex Parking” at the driveway serving the Roseville Energy Park gravel parking lot located on the north side of Phillip Road.
o “Do Not Enter” signage on westbound Phillip Road approaching the project driveway. o “Soccer Complex Entrance - Proceed Straight” on westbound Blue Oaks Boulevard approaching Westpark Drive and on northbound Westpark Drive approaching Phillip Road.
61 o “Soccer Complex - No Access Via Phillip Road” on northbound and southbound Westpark Drive approaching Phillip Road.
• Modify the intersection of Phillip Road and the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant north-south access road to include a paved turnout on the northerly side of the intersection. This intersection should be designed such that sufficient radius is available for westbound vehicles to complete a u-turn to travel eastbound on Phillip Road (i.e., to accommodate vehicle turnarounds for those attempting to enter the project site via Phillip Road).

Westbrook Boulevard/Durango Way Intersection
The Westbrook Boulevard/Durango Way intersection is a right-in/right-out only intersection located between the two Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections. The west leg of the intersection provides access into the adjacent Brookstone neighborhood to the west. Westbrook Boulevard has a raised median through the intersection and pedestrian crosswalks are not currently provided across Westbrook Boulevard at the intersection. The project would not modify this intersection or provide project site access via this intersection.

As described in the “Parking Demand and Supply” section, the proposed on-site parking supply would be expected to adequately accommodate project-generated parking demand associated with soccer tournaments at the complex. However, it is conceivable that project-related parking activity could occur in the Brookstone neighborhood in unanticipated instances where project parking demand exceeds the available on-site parking supply. In these instances, people desiring to travel between their parked vehicles on the west side of Westbrook Boulevard and the project site may choose to cross Westbrook Boulevard at Durango Way. This behavior would be undesirable given the lack of established pedestrian crossings and the high-speed, multi-lane characteristics of Westbrook Boulevard.

It is recommended that the City monitor the Westbrook Boulevard/Durango Way intersection during tournaments at the soccer complex and evaluate the extent to which pedestrian crossing activity occurs. If sufficient pedestrian activity occurs, it is recommended that the City implement measures to deter this behavior. Potential options include the installation of fencing along the Westbrook Boulevard median through the intersection and the installation of wayfinding signage directing pedestrians from the Brookstone neighborhood to utilize the marked crosswalks at one of the two Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections.

Passenger Loading Activity
The project would generate demand for passenger loading activity. During weekday practices and weekend games/tournaments, this would primarily take the form of parents, friends, etc. picking City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
62 up/dropping off players in a private vehicle. During weekend games/tournaments, this would also entail buses/shuttles picking up/dropping off players, coaches, and other team personnel.

Experience from comparable event centers and athletic facilities indicates that without designated passenger loading zones, private vehicle passenger loading activity typically occurs along curbspace at locations closest to the facility. The project proposes the provision of several on-site bus parking spaces that would accommodate buses/shuttles. The project site plan does not provide details regarding proposed passenger loading zones for general use.

It is recommended that designated passenger loading zones be provided along the easterly curbspace within both the northerly and southerly on-site parking lots. It is also recommended that “No Stopping Anytime” signage be installed on the east legs of both Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections (i.e., the project driveways) to prevent passenger loading activity from interfering with inbound traffic flows.

Finally, it is recommended that the City evaluate bus/large vehicle turning maneuvers and swept paths to ensure that the design of internal roadways/drive aisles can adequately accommodate bus maneuvers to and from the designated on-site bus parking spaces.
.
63 9. Conclusions
The following conclusions and recommendations were identified in this study:
• Transportation Impact Analysis
o The project would cause less-than-significant impacts to VMT, bicycle facilities, transit service and facilities, and roadway hazards.
o The project would cause a less-than-significant impact to pedestrian facilities with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.1.
• Traffic Operations Analysis
o Near-Term Plus Project Conditions
 Several study intersections would conflict with City LOS policies. The following modifications would improve operations at these intersections to acceptable levels:
• Signalize the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westbrook Boulevard intersection and maintain the existing lane configurations.
• Convert the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Westpark Drive intersection from allway to side-street stop control and maintain the existing lane configurations.
• Signalize the Blue Oaks Boulevard/Hayden Parkway intersection and widen the eastbound and westbound approaches to each consist of a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared through-right lane.  The Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections would both meet the peak hour signal warrant during the Saturday AM peak hour. The following modifications are recommended:
• Signalize the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections. • Eliminate the marked crosswalks on the south leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection and the north leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersection (due to split phase operations in the eastbound and westbound directions).  The project would cause vehicle queues that would block southbound through traffic on Westbrook Boulevard. The following modifications would address this issue:

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
Transportation Impact Study
June 2022
64 • At both the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North and Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersections, construct a southbound left-turn pocket with a storage length of 250 feet. o Cumulative Plus Project
 The project would cause the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard to conflict with City LOS policies. The following modification would improve operations at this intersection to acceptable levels:
• Modify the Westbrook Boulevard/Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection signal equipment and signal timing plan to operate with an overlap phase for the westbound right-turn phase (i.e., would operate concurrently with southbound left-turn).
 The project would require that the future planned traffic signals at the two Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections operate with split phasing in the eastbound and westbound directions. The following modifications would improve the efficiency of split phase operations at these intersections:
• Eliminate the marked crosswalks on the south leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive North intersection and the north leg of the Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive South intersection. • Parking, Access, and Circulation
o The proposed on-site parking supply would adequately accommodate project-generated parking demand during tournaments.
o The proposed project driveway throat depths would adequately accommodate queuing associated with inbound and outbound vehicles
o The following strategies and modifications are recommended to address adverse access and parking effects on Phillip Road:
 In informational materials related to the soccer complex, tournaments, etc., provide clear information regarding project site access and parking options.  Install the following signage:
• “No Parking” signage on both sides of Phillip Road between the project site and Westpark Drive,
• “No Soccer Complex Parking” at the driveway serving the Roseville Energy Park gravel parking lot located on the north side of Phillip Road. • “Do Not Enter” signage on westbound Phillip Road approaching the project driveway.
65 • “Soccer Complex Entrance - Proceed Straight” on westbound Blue Oaks Boulevard approaching Westpark Drive and on northbound Westpark Drive approaching Phillip Road.
• “Soccer Complex - No Access Via Phillip Road” on northbound and southbound Westpark Drive approaching Phillip Road.
 Modify the intersection of Phillip Road and the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant north-south access road to include a paved turnout on the northerly side of the intersection.
o It is recommended that the City monitor the Westbrook Boulevard/Durango Way intersection during tournaments at the soccer complex and evaluate the extent to which pedestrian crossing activity occurs. If sufficient pedestrian activity occurs, it is recommended that the City implement measures to deter this behavior. o The following actions are recommended to accommodate passenger loading activities:
 Provide designated passenger loading zones along the easterly curbspace within both the northerly and southerly on-site parking lots.
 Install “No Stopping Anytime” signage on the east legs of both Westbrook Boulevard/Brookstone Drive intersections (i.e., the project driveways).  Evaluate bus/large vehicle turning maneuvers and swept paths to ensure that the design of internal roadways/drive aisles can adequately accommodate bus maneuvers to and from the designated on-site bus parking spaces FEHR,1 PEERS

ATTACHMENT I

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
Environmental Noise Assessment
City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, California
June 17, 2022
Project #220310
Prepared for:

Montrose Environmental Solutions
1801 7th Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95811
Prepared by:

Saxelby Acoustics LLC
Luke Saxelby, INCE Bd. Cert.

Principal Consultant
Board Certified, Institute of Noise Control Engineering (INCE) (916) 760-8821
www.SaxNaise.com I [email protected]
915 Highland Pointe Drive, Suite 250
Roseville, CA 95678

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.............................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE........................................................................................................ 3 EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS...................................................................................................8 AMBIENT NOISE AT SENSITIVE RECEPTORS ..................................................................................................... 9 REGULATORY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................15 FEDERAL ................................................................................................................................................15 STATE....................................................................................................................................................15 LOCAL....................................................................................................................................................15 EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL NOISE AT RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS ..............................................11 INCREASES OVER AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS ....................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

CONCLUSIONS............................................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.

List Of Figures
Figure 1: Site Plan..........................................................................................................................................4 Figure 2: Noise Measurement Locations...................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Existing Ambient Noise Levels at Outdoor Activity Areas of Sensitive Receptors.......................10 Figure 4: Soccer Complex Noise Level Contours......................................................................................... 12 List Of Tables
Table 1: Typical Noise Levels......................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2: Summary of Existing Background Noise Measurement Data ......................................................... 8

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

INTRODUCTION
The City of Roseville Soccer Complex project consists of the development of a ten‐field‐soccer complex.

The project will include 964 off‐street parking stalls, a playground area, and picnic areas. The project would be located within the West Roseville Specific Plan area along the eastside of Westbrook Boulevard, south of Blue Oaks Boulevard and north of Pleasant Grove Boulevard. The Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant borders the project site to the east. The project site is currently vacant.

The City of Roseville has requested that an acoustical analysis be prepared to analyze potential noise impacts associated with the proposed project. Therefore, this analysis will predict the noise generation associated with these uses and will seek to achieve compliance with the applicable City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element goals and policies.

Figure 1 shows the project site plan. Figure 2 shows an aerial photo of the project site and noise measurement locations.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOISE
Fundamentals of Acoustics
Acoustics is the science of sound. Sound may be thought of as mechanical energy of a vibrating object transmitted by pressure waves through a medium to human (or animal) ears. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), then they can be heard and are called sound. The number of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound, and is expressed as cycles per second or Hertz (Hz).

Noise is a subjective reaction to different types of sounds. Noise is typically defined as (airborne) sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected or undesired, and may therefore be classified as a more specific group of sounds. Perceptions of sound and noise are highly subjective from person to person.

Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers.

To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing threshold (20 micropascals), as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to this reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibel scale allows a million‐fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB, and changes in levels(dB) correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable, and can be approximated by A‐weighted sound levels. There is a strong correlation between A‐weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and the way the human ear perceives sound. For this reason, the A‐weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A‐weighted levels, but are expressed as dB, unless otherwise noted.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, California
Figure 1
Project Site Plan
Project Location
LEGEND
0 PARKINGLOTl9SSTALLS/FIELD)·
• NORTH LOT 543 PAR!';ING STALLS
• SOUTH LOT 452 PARKING STALLS
0 0 CONCESS.ONS 6UILOING 0
©
SOLARPK:NICSH,t,DESTRUCTURE (50'X64')
0 ©
0 e
AlLACCESSlBLEPIAY AREAjl AOE)

PAIIK STORAGE/MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
SOLARSe!AOESTRUCTURES-PARKING
l08'X40'=24PARKINGSTAllS
@ BIOREMEDIATION: 31,000 SQUARE FEET @ LACROSSE FIELD STR iPING (FOR REFERENCE) @ UlO YOUTH SOCCER SnlPING (45 YDS X 65 YDS) G Ul2 YOUTH SOCCER STRIPING (50 YDS X 80 YDS)
NORTH
@ MAINTENANCE ROAD/ PERIMETER WALKWAY
e
@
@ FOOD TRUCK PARKING
@ 10'TALLCrlAINLINKFENCE
@) S' TAlt CHAIN LINK FENCE
@ 42" TALL CHAIN LINK fENCE
@) 6'TA.l10RNAMENTA.LFENO'
@ 1o'x1o·POP-UPTENTWlTHSCOREfSTABLf @ $PORT$ LIGHTING @ SOLAR SHADE STI1UCTURES - PROMENADE ®
@ PIAYER'S.-,REA
®
®
@ PEDESTRIANCROSSING
FIELDS2&.9
4CANTILEVERSOLARSHADESTRUCTURES

SOUTH PLAZA AREA
91 PARKINGSTALLS-NORTI1
3 SOIAR SHADE SIRUCTURfS . NORTH PARKING
102 PARKING STALLS· SOUTI1
2 SOIAR SHADE STRUCTURES· SOUTH PARKING
FIELDSlll. 10
4 CANTILEVER S01Al1 SHADE STRUCTURES
PrnMElER WAlKWAY
92PARK1NGSTALLS·NORTH
3 S01>.R SHADE STRUCTURES - NORTH PARKING
104 PARKING STAllS • SOUTH
3 S01>.R SHADE STRUCTURfS - SOUTH PARKING
City of Roseville Soccer Complex

MASTER PLAN - CONCEPT
City of Roseville
Westbrook Boulevard (II

VERDE DESIGN
l.ANOSCAP£"-'ICHITECTVRE
CMI.ENGINEERING
SPORT"'-ANIIING~DESIGH
15fllmf,f'<lo,tfl0.S...0.1<0 -~-
tu·40ll,MH2$l
-.~.C<WII
n SAXELBY
(~ ACOUSTICS Acoust i cs • Noise • Vibration
City of Roseville Soccer
Complex
City of Roseville, California
Figure 2Noise Measurement Sites
Legend
--Project Site
Noise Measurement Site - Long Term
Oft 500 ft
Projection: UTM Zone 10 / WGS84 / meters
Rev. Date: 04/22/2022
1000 ft

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx The decibel scale is logarithmic, not linear. In other words, two sound levels 10‐dB apart differ in acoustic energy by a factor of 10. When the standard logarithmic decibel is A‐weighted, an increase of 10‐dBA is generally perceived as a doubling in loudness. For example, a 70‐dBA sound is half as loud as an 80‐dBA sound, and twice as loud as a 60 dBA sound.

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the all‐ encompassing noise level associated with a given environment. A common statistical tool is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq), which corresponds to a steady‐state A weighted sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given time period (usually one hour). The Leq is the foundation of the composite noise descriptor, Ldn, and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

The day/night average level (Ldn) is based upon the average noise level over a 24‐hour day, with a +10‐ decibel weighing applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures asthough they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because Ldn represents a 24‐hour average, it tends to disguise short‐term variations in the noise environment.

Table 1 listsseveral examples of the noise levels associated with common situations. Appendix A provides a summary of acoustical terms used in this report.

TABLE 1: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS
Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities ‐‐110‐‐  Rock Band
Jet Fly‐over at 300 m (1,000 ft.)  ‐‐100‐‐
Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 ft.)  ‐‐90‐‐
Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 ft.),
at 80 km/hr. (50 mph) ‐‐80‐‐  Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft.) Garbage Disposal at 1 m (3 ft.)
Noisy Urban Area, Daytime
Gas Lawn Mower, 30 m (100 ft.) ‐‐70‐‐  Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 ft.) Commercial Area
Heavy Traffic at 90 m (300 ft.) ‐‐60‐‐  Normal Speech at 1 m (3 ft.) Quiet Urban Daytime  ‐‐50‐‐  Large Business Office
Dishwasher in Next Room
Quiet Urban Nighttime  ‐‐40‐‐  Theater, Large Conference Room (Background)
Quiet Suburban Nighttime  ‐‐30‐‐  Library
Quiet Rural Nighttime  ‐‐20‐‐  Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (Background) ‐‐10‐‐  Broadcast/Recording Studio
Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing  ‐‐0‐‐  Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: Caltrans, Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. September, 2013. \
\
\
-,,\\
'-~ '""--------
~'-
'
~~~-----
-~===

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx Effects of Noise on People
The effects of noise on people can be placed in three categories:
 Subjective effects of annoyance, nuisance, and dissatisfaction  Interference with activities such as speech, sleep, and learning  Physiological effects such as hearing loss or sudden startling Environmental noise typically produces effects in the first two categories. Workers in industrial plants can experience noise in the last category. There is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or the corresponding reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. A wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance exists and different tolerances to noise tend to develop based on an individual’s past experiences with noise.

Thus, an important way of predicting a human reaction to a new noise environment isthe way it compares to the existing environment to which one has adapted: the so‐called ambient noise level. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will be judged by those hearing it.

With regard to increases in A‐weighted noise level, the following relationships occur:
 Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1‐dBA cannot be perceived;  Outside of the laboratory, a 3‐dBA change is considered a just‐perceivable difference;  A change in level of at least 5‐dBA is required before any noticeable change in human response would be expected; and
 A 10‐dBA change is subjectively heard as approximately a doubling in loudness, and can cause an adverse response.

Stationary point sources of noise – including stationary mobile sources such as idling vehicles – attenuate (lessen) at a rate of approximately 6‐dB per doubling of distance from the source, depending on environmental conditions (i.e. atmospheric conditions and either vegetative or manufactured noise barriers, etc.). Widely distributed noises, such as a large industrial facility spread over many acres, or a street with moving vehicles, would typically attenuate at a lower rate.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS
To quantify the existing ambient noise environment in the project vicinity, Saxelby Acoustics conducted a continuous (24‐hr.) noise level measurement at two locations near sensitive receptors adjacent to the project site over four days. Noise measurement locations are shown on Figure 2. A summary of the noise level measurement survey results is provided in Table 2. Appendix B contains the complete results of the noise monitoring.

The sound level meters were programmed to record the maximum, median, and average noise levels at each site during the survey. The maximum value, denoted Lmax, represents the highest noise level measured. The average value, denoted Leq, represents the energy average of all of the noise received by the sound level meter microphone during the monitoring period. The median value, denoted L50, represents the sound level exceeded 50 percent of the time during the monitoring period.

Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) model 820 precision integrating sound level meters were used for the ambient noise level measurement survey. The meters were calibrated before and after use with a CAL 200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all pertinent specifications of the American National Standards Institute for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4).

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF EXISTING BACKGROUND NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA Location Date Ldn
Daytime
Leq
Daytime
L50
Daytime
Lmax
Nighttime
Leq
Nighttime
L50
Nighttime
Lmax
LT‐1: 75 ft. to
CL of
Westbrook
Blvd.
4/23/2022 62 62 53 83 52 46 68
4/24/2022 61 62 51 84 51 43 69
4/25/2022 62 61 53 83 53 46 72
4/26/2022 62 62 53 85 53 45 72
LT‐2: 115 ft.
to CL of
Westbrook
Blvd.
4/23/2022 57 57 50 80 48 44 69
4/24/2022 60 61 50 82 48 44 65
4/25/2022 60 58 53 78 52 44 71
4/26/2022 60 58 53 78 52 44 71
Notes:
 All values shown in dBA
 Daytime hours: 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
 Nighttime Hours: 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
 Source: Saxelby Acoustics 2022
I
\
\
\
\,,
~ ..... _,
----............

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS AT SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
To accurately assess the effect of the proposed project on surrounding sensitive uses, Saxelby Acoustics determined the existing ambient noise levels in the backyard areas of the nearby residences which are shielded by existing concrete masonry sound walls located along Westbrook Boulevard. Using the data collected during the long‐term noise levelsurvey, Saxelby Acoustics modeled noise levels emanating from Westbrook Blvd at the existing noise‐sensitive receptor backyards. It should be noted that Westbrook Boulevard was noted asthe primary daytime noise source.  However, contributionsto ambient noise from the Roseville Energy Park or the Pleasant Grove Waste Water Treatment Plan (WWTP) are also included in the collected ambient noise readings.

Inputsto the model included sound powerlevelsfor Westbrook Boulevard, existing sound walls, buildings, terrain type, and locations of sensitive receptors.   These predictions are made in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 9613‐2:1996 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors).  ISO9613 isthe most commonly used method for calculating exterior noise propagation. The results of this analysis are shown graphically on Figure 3 in terms of the average (Leq) daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) noise levels.

City of Roseville Soccer
Complex
City of Roseville, California
Figure 3
Existing Daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.)Average Ambient Noise Levels (dBA Leq) 57 dBA
57 dBA
58 dBA
57 dBA
57 dBA
56 dBA
Signs and symbols
Project Boundary Existing wall
150 225

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL NOISE AT RESIDENTIAL RECEPTORS The primary noise sources associated with a soccer field are loud conversation amongst players and coaches on the field, referee whistles, and crowd noise. Secondary noise sources associated with the project include a playground at the north of the project site. This analysis considers each of these noise sources along with vehicle circulation on the project site. The following is a list of assumptions used for the noise modeling.   The data used is based upon Saxelby Acoustics data from similar facilities and predicted project trip generation volumes from the traffic engineer (Fehr & Peers).

On‐Site Circulation: The proposed soccer complex is predicted to generate up to 480 peak hour trips during a typical weekday and up to 1,074 peak hour trips during tournaments (Fehr & Peers). Parking lot movements are predicted to generate a sound exposure level (SEL) of 71 dBA SEL at 50 feet for cars. Nighttime traffic outside of the AM or PM peak hour is not expected to occur. Saxelby Acoustics data.

Soccer Field: Based upon measurements taken at various facilities, soccer games varied in noise level from 52 to 55 dBA Leq at 200 feet as measured from the center of the field to sidelines opposite of spectators. It was assumed that half of the fields would operate at 52 dBA Leq at 200 feet and half would operate at 55 dBA Leq at 200 feet. Maximum (Lmax) noise levels for a typical soccer game were found to be 73 dBA at 200 feet.

Playground Area: Recreational activity in center of playground area at 55 dBA Leq and 75 dBA Lmax at 100 feet. Daytime use only. Saxelby Acoustics data.

Saxelby Acoustics used the SoundPLAN noise prediction model. Inputsto the model included sound power levels for the proposed soccer fields, parking lots, and playground, existing and proposed buildings, existing sound walls, terrain type, and locations of sensitive receptors.  These predictions are made in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 9613‐2:1996 (Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors).  ISO 9613 is the most commonly used method for calculating exterior noise propagation. The results of this analysis are shown graphically on Figure 4.

57 dBA
City of Roseville Soccer
Complex
City of Roseville, California
Figure
4 Project Noise Contours (dBA Leq)
59 dBA
62 dBA
Existing: 58 dBA
Project: 50 dBA
Ex+P: 59 dBA
Change: +1 dBA
Existing: 56 dBA
Project: 53 dBA
Ex+P: 58 dBA
Change: +2 dBA
Existing: 57 dBA
Project: 55 dBA
Ex+P: 59 dBA
Change: +2 dBA
Existing: 57 dBA
Project: 54 dBA
Ex+P: 59 dBA
Change: +2 dBA
Existing: 57 dBA
Project: 51 dBA
Ex+P: 58 dBA
Change: +1 dBA
Existing: 57 dBA
Project: 47 dBA
Ex+P: 57 dBA
Change: +0 dBA
Existing: 57 dBA
Project: 48 dBA
Ex+P: 58 dBA
Change: +1 dBA
Signs and symbols
- Project Boundary
Levels in dB(A)
<= 57
- 57 - 58
58 - 59
59 - 60
60 - 61
61 - 62
> 62
1 : 7350
0 37.5 75 150 225 300
m
(~ ACOUSTICS Acoust i cs . Noise . Vibration

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

CONSTRUCTION NOISE ENVIRONMENT
During the construction of the proposed project noise from construction activities would temporarily add to the noise environment in the project vicinity. As shown in Table 3, activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dB at a distance of 50 feet.

TABLE 3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dBA at 50 feet
Auger Drill Rig 84
Backhoe 78
Compactor 83
Compressor (air) 78
Concrete Saw 90
Dozer 82
Dump Truck 76
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Jackhammer 89
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. Federal Highway Administration. FHWA‐HEP‐05‐054. January 2006. / ,,,,./ ~ /.,,..,
/.
/
I
I
I i
I I
I /

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT
The primary vibration‐generating activities associated with the proposed project would occur during construction when activitiessuch as grading, utilities placement, and parking lot construction occur. Table 4 shows the typical vibration levels produced by construction equipment.

TABLE 4: VIBRATION LEVELS FOR VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Type of Equipment
Peak Particle Velocity at
25 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
50 feet
(inches/second)
Peak Particle Velocity at
100 feet
(inches/second)
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.031 0.011
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.027 0.010
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.001 0.000
Auger/drill Rigs 0.089 0.031 0.011
Jackhammer 0.035 0.012 0.004
Vibratory Hammer 0.070 0.025 0.009
Vibratory Compactor/roller 0.210
(Less than 0.20 at 26 feet) 0.074 0.026
Source: Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines. Federal Transit Administration. May 2006. /
/
/
/
I ,/
I
/ /

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

REGULATORY CONTEXT

FEDERAL
There are no federal regulations related to noise that apply to the Proposed Project.

STATE
There are no state regulations related to noise that apply to the Proposed Project.

LOCAL
City of Roseville General Plan
The City of Roseville General Plan Noise Element Table 1X‐3 (Table 3) establishes an acceptable exterior noise level of 50 dBA Leq for daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) for stationary noise sources.

TABLE 3: CITY OF ROSEVILLE NOISE ELEMENT TABLE 1X‐3
SOURCE: CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL PLAN NOISE ELEMENT 2035.

TABLE IX-3

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

FOR NON-TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES

OR PROJECTS AFFECTED BY NON-TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES (As Measured at t he Property Line of Noise-Sensitive Uses) Noise Level
Descript or
Hourly L~, dB
Maximum level, dB
Daytime
(7 a.m. to 10 p.m.)
50 70
Nighttime
(1 0 p.m. to 7 a.m.)
45 65
1 For municipal power plants consisting primarily of broadband, steady state noise sources, the hourly (Leq) noise standard may be increased up to 10 dB(A), but not exceed 55 dB(A) Hourly Leq dB.

Each of the noise levels specified above should be lowered by five dB for simple tone noises, noises consisting pri marily of speech or music, or for recurring impulsive noises. Such noises are generally considered by residents to be particularly an noying and are a primary source of noise complaints. These noise level standards do not apply to residential units established in conjunction with industrial or commercial uses (e.g., caretaker dwellings).

No standards have been included for interior noise levels. Standard construction practices should, with exterior noise levels identified, result in acceptable interior noise levels.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx City of Roseville Noise Ordinance
The City of Roseville Municipal Code outlines the following sound limits for sensitive receptors:

9.24.100 SOUND LIMITS FOR SENSITIVE RECEPTORS.

It is unlawful for any person at any location to create any sound, or to allow the creation of any sound, on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the exterior sound level when measured at the property line of any affected sensitive receptor to exceed the ambient sound level by three dBA or exceed the sound level standards as set forth in Table 1, by three dBA, whichever is greater.

Table 1

SOUND LEVEL STANDARDS
(for non‐transportation or fixed sound sources)
Sound Level Descriptor Daytime
(7:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m.)
Nighttime
(10:00 p.m. to
7:00 a.m.)
Hourly leq, dB 50 45
Maximum level, dB 70 65
A.  Each of the sound level standards specified in Table 1 shall be reduced by five dB for simple tone noises, consisting of speech and music. However, in no case shall the sound level standard be lower than the ambient sound level plus three dB.

B.  If the intruding sound source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient sound level can be measured, the sound level measured while the source is in operation shall be compared directly to the sound level standards of Table 1. (Ord. 3638 § 1, 2001.)

9.24.130 SOUND LIMITS FOR EVENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.24.100, sound sources associated with outside activities on public property (e.g. athletic events, sporting events, fairs, and entertainment events) between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 10:30 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Fridays, Saturdays, and city‐recognized holidays, shall not exceed 80 dBA, Lmax at the property line of the property on which the event is being held. (Ord. 3638 § 1, 2001.)

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

9.24.030 EXEMPTIONS.

Sound or noise emanating from the following sources and activities are exempt from the provisions of this title:

A.  Sound sources typically associated with residential uses (e.g., children at play, air conditioning and similar equipment, but not including barking dogs); B.  Sound sources associated with property maintenance (e.g., lawn mowers, edgers, blowers, pool pumps, power tools, etc.) provided such activities take place between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.;
C.  Safety, warning and alarm devices, including house and car alarms, and other warning devices that are designed to protect the health, safety and welfare, provided such devices are not negligently maintained or operated;
D.  The normal operation of public and private schools typically consisting of classes and other school‐sponsored activities;
E.  Maintenance (e.g., lawn mowers, edgers, aerators, blowers, etc.) of golf courses, provided such activities take place between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. May through September, and 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. October through April; F.  Emergencies involving the execution of the duties of duly authorized governmental personnel and others providing emergency response to the general public, including, but not limited to, sworn peace officers, emergency personnel, utility personnel, and the operation of emergency response vehicles and equipment;
G.  Private construction (e.g., construction, alteration or repair activities) between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday; provided, however, that all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices and that all construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order. (Ord. 3638 § 1, 2001.)

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE VIBRATION
Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, whereas vibration usually consists of the excitation of a structure or surface. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s perception to the vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity to vibration, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source and the response of the system which is vibrating.

Vibration can be measured in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration measures in terms of peak particle velocities in inches persecond. Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration levels defined in terms of peak particle velocities.

Human and structural response to different vibration levelsis influenced by a number of factors, including ground type, distance between source and receptor, duration, and the number of perceived vibration events. Table 8, which was developed by Caltrans, shows the vibration levels which would normally be required to result in damage to structures. The vibration levels are presented in terms of peak particle velocity in inches per second.

Table 8 indicatesthat the threshold for architectural damage to structuresis 0.20 in/sec p.p.v. A threshold of 0.2 in/sec p.p.v. is considered to be a reasonable threshold for short‐term construction projects.

TABLE 5: EFFECTS OF VIBRATION ON PEOPLE AND BUILDINGS
Peak Particle Velocity Human Reaction Effect on Buildings mm/second in/second

0.15‐0.30 0.006‐0.019 Threshold of perception; possibility of intrusion
Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of
any type

2.0 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible
Recommended upper level of the
vibration to which ruins and ancient
monuments should be subjected

2.5 0.10 Level at which continuous vibrations
begin to annoy people
Virtually no risk of “architectural”
damage to normal buildings

5.0 0.20
Vibrations annoying to people in
buildings (this agrees with the levels
established for people standing on
bridges and subjected to relative
short periods of vibrations)
Threshold at which there is a risk of
“architectural” damage to normal
dwelling ‐ houses with plastered walls
and ceilings. Special types of finish such
as lining of walls, flexible ceiling
treatment, etc., would minimize
“architectural” damage
10‐15 0.4‐0.6
Vibrations considered unpleasant by
people subjected to continuous
vibrations and unacceptable to some
people walking on bridges
Vibrations at a greater level than
normally expected from traffic, but
would cause “architectural” dam age
and possibly minor structural damage
Source: Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. Caltrans. TAV‐02‐01‐R9601. February 20, 2002. \ \ \\
--~ '~-----------~
~

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project would normally be considered to result in significant noise impacts if noise levels conflict with adopted environmental standards or plans or if noise generated by the project would substantially increase existing noise levels at sensitive receivers on a permanent or temporary basis. Significance criteria for noise impacts are drawn from CEQA Guidelines Appendix G (Items XI [a‐f]).

Would the project:
a.   Generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b.   Generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c.   For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION NOISE INCREASES
Per the City of Roseville Municipal Code, construction activities are exempt assuming that they occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday; provided, however, that all construction equipment shall be fitted with factory installed muffling devices and that all construction equipment shall be maintained in good working order.

CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION CRITERIA
A threshold of 0.2 in/sec p.p.v. is considered to be a reasonable threshold for short‐term construction projects.

NOISE LEVEL INCREASE CRITERIA FOR LONG‐TERM PROJECT‐RELATED NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Per the City of Roseville Municipal Code noise ordinance, an increase in ambient noise levels exceeding 3 dBA would be considered significant.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx PROJECT‐SPECIFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Impact 1: Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Traffic Noise Increases at Off‐Site Receptors
Based upon the transportation analysis prepared for the project (Fehr & Peers, June 2022) the proposed project is predicted to result in a reduction of 382 daily vehicle trips as compared to the planned vehicle trips assumed for the underlying land use assumed in the West Roseville Specific Plan.   Therefore, potential impacts resulting from increased traffic noise would be considered less‐than‐significant.

Operational Noise at Sensitive Receptors

PROJECT NOISE EXPOSURE
As shown in Figure 3, the ambient noise levels at sensitive receptors adjacent to the project site were found to range from 56 to 58 dBA Leq during daytime hours due primarily to existing traffic noise, the Roseville Energy Park, and the Pleasant Grove WWTP. This already exceeds the City of Roseville 50 dBA Leq daytime noise standard,shown in Table 3. Therefore, this analysis examines whetherthe project would cause a significant increase in ambient noise levels. Figure 4 shows that project noise levels at the nearest backyards along Westbrook Boulevard range from 47 to 55 dBA Leq, causing ambient noise increases ranging from 0‐ to 2‐dBA Leq. This is less than the 3 dBA standard established in the City of Roseville Municipal Code noise ordinance Section 9.24.100.

It should also be noted that the maximum property line noise level at the soccer complex is predicted to be 62 dBA Leq. Maximum (Lmax) noise levels from typical soccer activity was measured by Saxelby Acousticsto be 18 dBA higher than average (Leq) values.  Therefore, the property line maximum noise level is predicted to be 80 dBA Lmax. This complies with the City of Roseville Municipal Code noise ordinance requirement that sound sources associated with outside activities on public property not exceed 80 dBA Lmax at the property line on which the event is being held, as outlined in Section 9.24.130.

Therefore, operational noise from the project would be considered less‐than‐significant.

Construction Noise
During the construction phases of the project, noise from construction activities would add to the noise environment in the immediate project vicinity. As indicated in Table 4, activities involved in construction would generate maximum noise levels ranging from 76 to 90 dBA Lmax at a distance of 50 feet. Most of the project construction would occur at distances of 200 feet or greater from the nearest residences.

Additionally, construction noise would be shielded by existing masonry sound walls located along Westbrook Boulevard. At 200 feet, maximum noise levels from the loudest pieces of equipment would be approximately 73 dBA Lmax in the nearest residential backyards. Existing maximum noise levels are estimated to be approximately 76‐78 dBA Lmax in the nearest residential backyards.  Therefore, project construction is not predicted to increase existing noise levels at the nearest noise sensitive receptors.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx Construction noise associated with parking lot paving would be similar to noise that would be associated with public works projects, such as a roadway widening or street paving projects. Construction activities would be temporary in nature and are anticipated to occur during normal daytime working hours.

Noise would also be generated during the construction phase by increased truck traffic on area roadways.

A project‐generated noise source would be truck traffic associated with transport of heavy materials and equipment to and from the construction site. This noise increase would be of short duration and would occur primarily during daytime hours.

The City of Roseville exempts construction noise from the Noise Ordinance provisions if construction activity is limited to daytime hours. These exemptions are typical of City and County noise ordinances and reflect the recognition that construction‐related noise is temporary in character, is generally acceptable when limited to daylight hours, and is part of what residents of urban areas expect as part of a typical urban noise environment (along with sirens, etc.)
This is a less‐than‐significant impact, and no mitigation is required.

Impact 2: Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building structural damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of perception.

Building damage can take the form of cosmetic or structural.

The Table 4 data indicate that construction vibration levels anticipated for the project are less than the

0.2 in/sec threshold at distances of 26 feet. Sensitive receptors which could be impacted by construction related vibrations, especially vibratory compactors/rollers, are located approximately 26 feet, or further, from typical construction activities. At these distances construction vibrations are not predicted to exceed acceptable levels. Additionally, construction activities would be temporary in nature and would likely occur during normal daytime working hours.

This is a less‐than‐significant impact and no mitigation is required.

Impact 3: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
There are no projects within 2 miles of the project site. Therefore, this impact is not applicable to the proposed project.

City of Roseville Soccer Complex
City of Roseville, CA
Job #220310
June 17, 2022 www.SaxNoise.com

\\SAXDESKTOPNEW\Job Folders\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex\Word\220310 Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex.docx

REFERENCES
American National Standards Institute. (1998). [Standard] ANSI S1.43‐1997 (R2007): Specifications for integrating‐averaging sound level meters. New York: Acoustical Society of America.

American Standard Testing Methods, Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A‐Weighted Sound Levels, American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM) E1014‐08, 2008.

ASTM E1014‐12. Standard Guide for Measurement of Outdoor A‐Weighted Sound Levels. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.

ASTM E1780‐12. Standard Guide for Measuring Outdoor Sound Received from a Nearby Fixed Source. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. 2012.

Barry, T M. (1978). FHWA highway traffic noise prediction model (FHWA‐RD‐77‐108). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of transportation, Federal highway administration, Office of research, Office of environmental policy.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement, Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.

Egan, M. D. (1988). Architectural acoustics. United States of America: McGraw‐Hill Book Company.

Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. FHWA‐HEP‐ 05‐054 DOT‐VNTSC‐FHWA‐05‐01. January 2006.

Hanson, Carl E. (Carl Elmer). (2006). Transit noise and vibration impact assessment. Washington, DC:

U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Office of Planning and Environment.

International Electrotechnical Commission. Technical committee 29:  Electroacoustics. International Organization of Legal Metrology. (2013). Electroacoustics: Sound level meters.

International Organization for Standardization. (1996). Acoustic ‐ ISO 9613‐2: Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. Part 2: General methods of calculation. Ginevra: I.S.O.

Miller, L. N., Bolt, Beranek, & and Newman, Inc. (1981). Noise control for buildings and manufacturing plants. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.

SoundPLAN.  SoundPLAN GmbH. Backnang, Germany.  http://www.soundplan.eu/english/ Appendix A: Acoustical Terminology
Acoustics   The science of sound.

Ambient Noise  The distinctive acoustical characteristics of a given space consisting of all noise sources audible at that location. In many cases, the term ambient is used to describe an existing or pre‐project condition such as the setting in an environmental noise study.

ASTC  Apparent  Sound  Transmission  Class.    Similar  to  STC  but  includes  sound  from  flanking  paths  and  correct  for  room reverberation. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Attenuation   The reduction of an acoustic signal.

A‐Weighting   A  frequency‐response  adjustment  of  a  sound  level meter  that  conditions  the  output  signal  to  approximate  human response.

Decibel or dB   Fundamental  unit  of  sound, A Bell is  defined as  the logarithm  of  the  ratio  of  the  sound  pressure  squared  over  the reference pressure squared. A Decibel is one‐tenth of a Bell.

CNEL   Community Noise Equivalent Level. Defined as  the 24‐hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 ‐ 10 p.m.) weighted by +5 dBA and nighttime hours weighted by +10 dBA.

DNL  See definition of Ldn.

IIC  Impact  Insulation  Class.  An  integer‐number  rating  of  how  well  a  building  floor  attenuates  impact  sounds,  such  as footsteps. A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Frequency   The measure of the rapidity of alterations of a periodic signal, expressed in cycles per second or hertz (Hz).

Ldn     Day/Night Average Sound Level. Similar to CNEL but with no evening weighting.

Leq     Equivalent or energy‐averaged sound level.

Lmax     The highest root‐mean‐square (RMS) sound level measured over a given period of time.

L(n)   The sound level exceeded a described percentile over a measurement period. For instance, an hourly L50 is the sound level exceeded 50% of the time during the one‐hour period.

Loudness   A subjective term for the sensation of the magnitude of sound.

NIC  Noise Isolation Class.  A rating of the noise reduction between two spaces.  Similar to STC but includes sound  from flanking paths and no correction for room reverberation.

NNIC  Normalized Noise Isolation Class.  Similar to NIC but includes a correction for room reverberation.

Noise     Unwanted sound.

NRC   Noise Reduction Coefficient. NRC is a single‐number rating of the sound‐absorption of a material equal to the arithmetic mean of the sound‐absorption coefficients in the 250, 500, 1000, and 2,000 Hz octave frequency bands rounded to the nearest multiple  of  0.05. It  is  a  representation  of  the  amount of  sound energy  absorbed  upon  striking  a  particular surface. An NRC of 0 indicates perfect reflection; an NRC of 1 indicates perfect absorption.

RT60     The time it takes reverberant sound to decay by 60 dB once the source has been removed.

Sabin   The unit of sound absorption. One square foot of material absorbing 100% of incident sound has an absorption of 1 Sabin.

SEL   Sound Exposure Level. SEL is a rating, in decibels, of a discrete event, such as an aircraft flyover or train pass by, that compresses the total sound energy into a one‐second event.

SPC  Speech Privacy Class. SPC is a method of rating speech privacy in buildings. It is designed  to measure the degree of speech  privacy  provided  by  a  closed  room,  indicating  the  degree  to  which  conversations  occurring  within  are  kept private from listeners outside the room.

STC   Sound Transmission Class. STC is an integer rating of how well a building partition attenuates airborne sound. It is widely used  to  rate  interior  partitions,  ceilings/floors,  doors,  windows  and  exterior  wall  configurations.    The  STC  rating  is typically used to rate the sound transmission of a specific building element when tested in laboratory conditions where flanking paths around the assembly don’t exist.   A larger number means more attenuation. The scale, like the decibel scale for sound, is logarithmic.

Threshold  The lowest sound that can be perceived by the human auditory system, generally considered of Hearing   to be 0 dB for persons with perfect hearing.

Threshold   Approximately 120 dB above the threshold of hearing. of Pain
Impulsive   Sound of short duration, usually less than one second, with an abrupt onset and rapid decay.

Simple Tone         Any sound which can be judged as audible as a single pitch or set of single pitches.

Appendix B: Continuous Ambient Noise
Measurement Results
(~ ACOUSTICS
Acous tl cs • No l se • Vl b ra tl on --------
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Saturday, April 23, 2022 0:00 48 67 45 40 Coordinates: 38.7895485°, Saturday, April 23, 2022 1:00 48 65 46 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 2:00 52 78 43 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 3:00 45 61 44 40
Saturday, April 23, 2022 4:00 43 61 41 39
Saturday, April 23, 2022 5:00 46 69 41 38
Saturday, April 23, 2022 6:00 51 72 47 43
Saturday, April 23, 2022 7:00 58 77 51 45
Saturday, April 23, 2022 8:00 57 78 51 45
Saturday, April 23, 2022 9:00 58 81 52 46
Saturday, April 23, 2022 10:00 61 85 53 46
Saturday, April 23, 2022 11:00 61 81 53 47
Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:00 65 94 54 48
Saturday, April 23, 2022 13:00 61 88 55 49
Saturday, April 23, 2022 14:00 62 82 56 48
Saturday, April 23, 2022 15:00 69 101 52 45
Saturday, April 23, 2022 16:00 58 82 53 47
Saturday, April 23, 2022 17:00 60 82 53 47
Saturday, April 23, 2022 18:00 59 78 52 46
Saturday, April 23, 2022 19:00 57 80 52 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 20:00 59 82 51 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 21:00 59 76 51 43
Saturday, April 23, 2022 22:00 54 71 48 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 23:00 59 71 49 43
Leq Lmax L50 L90
62 83 53 46
52 68 45 41
57 76 51 42
69 101 56 49
43 61 41 38
59 78 49 44
62 95
CNEL 62 Night % 5
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
Night Average
CAL200
-121.3872283°
Saturday, April 23, 2022 Saturday, April 23, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
Appendix B1a: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-3
67 65
78 61 61
69 72
77 78
81 85
81 94
88 82
101
82 82
78 80 82
76 71 71
40 44
41 40 39 38
43 45 45 46 46 47 48 49 48
45 47 47 46 44
42 43 44 43
48 48
52 45 43
46 51
58 57 58
61 61
65 61 62
69 58 60 59 57 59 59
54 59
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
105
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1 West Brook Blvd.
■
•• - ---+-
-
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Sunday, April 24, 2022 0:00 48 67 42 37 Coordinates: 38.7895485°, Sunday, April 24, 2022 1:00 45 66 38 34
Sunday, April 24, 2022 2:00 46 67 41 39
Sunday, April 24, 2022 3:00 49 72 46 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 4:00 47 66 43 36
Sunday, April 24, 2022 5:00 45 65 37 34
Sunday, April 24, 2022 6:00 52 69 49 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:00 54 79 49 46
Sunday, April 24, 2022 8:00 54 72 51 45
Sunday, April 24, 2022 9:00 57 77 50 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 10:00 58 83 51 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 11:00 59 84 52 46
Sunday, April 24, 2022 12:00 63 88 53 45
Sunday, April 24, 2022 13:00 69 101 52 45
Sunday, April 24, 2022 14:00 62 87 51 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 15:00 62 90 52 46
Sunday, April 24, 2022 16:00 58 77 53 47
Sunday, April 24, 2022 17:00 60 85 54 48
Sunday, April 24, 2022 18:00 61 85 54 48
Sunday, April 24, 2022 19:00 58 82 51 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 20:00 57 81 47 39
Sunday, April 24, 2022 21:00 59 85 48 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 22:00 51 70 45 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 23:00 58 81 48 44
Leq Lmax L50 L90
62 84 51 45
51 69 43 39
54 72 47 39
69 101 54 48
45 65 37 34
58 81 49 44
61 95
62 5
Appendix B1b: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-3
Night Average
CAL200
-121.3872283°
Sunday, April 24, 2022 Sunday, April 24, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
67 66 67
72 66 65
69 79
72 77
83 84
88 101
87 90
77 85 85
82 81
85 70
81 37
34 39
44 36 34
44 46 45 44 43
46 45 45 44 46 47 48 48
42 39
43 42
44 48
45 46
49 47
45 52
54 54
57 58 59
63 69
62 62
58 60 6158 57 59
51 58
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
105
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1 West Brook Blvd.
■
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Monday, April 25, 2022 0:00 46 63 45 43 Coordinates: 38.7895485°, Monday, April 25, 2022 1:00 50 75 45 43
Monday, April 25, 2022 2:00 45 58 45 44
Monday, April 25, 2022 3:00 47 70 45 44
Monday, April 25, 2022 4:00 50 67 46 44
Monday, April 25, 2022 5:00 56 83 46 44
Monday, April 25, 2022 6:00 59 82 52 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 7:00 60 79 55 50
Monday, April 25, 2022 8:00 61 81 56 49
Monday, April 25, 2022 9:00 61 84 53 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 10:00 59 82 52 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 11:00 62 84 53 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 12:00 61 79 54 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 13:00 63 89 54 48
Monday, April 25, 2022 14:00 64 90 56 48
Monday, April 25, 2022 15:00 63 87 54 48
Monday, April 25, 2022 16:00 60 78 53 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 17:00 62 85 54 48
Monday, April 25, 2022 18:00 62 80 54 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 19:00 60 85 51 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 20:00 54 73 48 43
Monday, April 25, 2022 21:00 60 89 45 42
Monday, April 25, 2022 22:00 51 71 44 42
Monday, April 25, 2022 23:00 52 80 44 43
Leq Lmax L50 L90
61 83 53 47
53 72 46 44
54 73 45 42
64 90 56 50
45 58 44 42
59 83 52 47
62 92
62 8
Appendix B1c: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-3
Night Average
CAL200
-121.3872283°
Monday, April 25, 2022 Monday, April 25, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
63 75
58 70
67 83 82
79 81
84 82
84 79
89 90
87 78
85 80
85 73
89 71
80 43 43 44 44 44 44
47 50 49
47 46 47 47 48 48 48 47 48 46 46
43 42 42 43
46 50
45 47
50 56
59 60 61 61
59 62 61
63 64 63
60 62 62
60 54
60 51 52
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1 West Brook Blvd.
[ ■
•••
■
- ---+--
Site: LT-1
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Tuesday, April 26, 2022 0:00 46 65 44 42 Coordinates: 38.7895485°, Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:00 47 73 44 42
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 2:00 44 59 43 42
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:00 45 65 43 42
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:00 49 68 44 42
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:00 53 75 46 43
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:00 60 83 50 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 7:00 61 87 55 48
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 8:00 62 85 57 52
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 9:00 62 79 55 49
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:00 62 87 52 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:00 63 84 52 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 12:00 61 80 52 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 13:00 65 91 52 45
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 14:00 63 82 55 48
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 15:00 66 88 57 49
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 16:00 61 85 55 49
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 17:00 66 91 54 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 18:00 60 85 53 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 19:00 59 82 52 45
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 20:00 60 90 48 42
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 21:00 54 80 46 41
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 22:00 55 83 47 44
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 23:00 52 81 45 43
Leq Lmax L50 L90
62 85 53 47
53 72 45 43
54 79 46 41
66 91 57 52
44 59 43 42
60 83 50 46
62 94
63 6
Appendix B1d: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
Northern Project Boundary
LDL 820-3
Night Average
CAL200
-121.3872283°
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
65 73
59 65
68 75
83 87 85
79 87
84 80
91 82
88 85
91 85
82 90
80 83
81 42 42 42 42 42 43
46 48
52 49
47 46 46 45
48 49 49
47 47
45 42 41
44 43
46 47
44 45
49 53
60 61 62 62 62 63 61
65 63
66 61
66 60 59 60
54 55
52 25
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-1 West Brook Blvd.

Site: LT-2
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Saturday, April 23, 2022 0:00 48 64 45 39 Coordinates: 38.784781°, Saturday, April 23, 2022 1:00 48 65 46 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 2:00 50 71 42 40
Saturday, April 23, 2022 3:00 43 64 40 38
Saturday, April 23, 2022 4:00 44 61 40 38
Saturday, April 23, 2022 5:00 46 66 43 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 6:00 50 74 46 43
Saturday, April 23, 2022 7:00 54 73 48 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 8:00 56 82 50 43
Saturday, April 23, 2022 9:00 55 76 50 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 10:00 61 86 52 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 11:00 56 72 50 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 12:00 59 81 51 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 13:00 58 86 50 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 14:00 57 84 51 43
Saturday, April 23, 2022 15:00 58 78 50 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 16:00 56 78 50 42
Saturday, April 23, 2022 17:00 55 78 50 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 18:00 55 75 50 41
Saturday, April 23, 2022 19:00 57 86 49 40
Saturday, April 23, 2022 20:00 58 89 49 44
Saturday, April 23, 2022 21:00 53 70 48 45
Saturday, April 23, 2022 22:00 55 80 51 48
Saturday, April 23, 2022 23:00 52 74 48 43
Leq Lmax L50 L90
57 80 50 42
48 69 44 42
53 70 48 40
61 89 52 45
43 61 40 38
52 80 51 48
57 93
58 7
Appendix B2a: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
South West of the Project Boundary
LDL 820-5
Night Average
CAL200
-121.387688°
Saturday, April 23, 2022 Saturday, April 23, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
64 65
71 64
61 66
74 73
82 76
86 72
81 86
84 78 78 78
75 86
89 70
80 74
39 44
40 38 38
41 43 42 43 42
44 41 42 42 43 41 42 41 41 40
44 45
48 43
48 48
50 43 44
46 50
54 56 55
61 56
59 58 57 58 56 55 55
57 58
53 55
52 25
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-2
- ---+--
Site: LT-2
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Sunday, April 24, 2022 0:00 49 69 45 39 Coordinates: 38.784781°, Sunday, April 24, 2022 1:00 46 66 41 39
Sunday, April 24, 2022 2:00 48 60 45 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 3:00 48 67 44 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 4:00 47 62 44 38
Sunday, April 24, 2022 5:00 45 60 42 39
Sunday, April 24, 2022 6:00 50 66 47 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 7:00 52 73 48 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 8:00 53 65 49 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 9:00 54 73 50 41
Sunday, April 24, 2022 10:00 54 74 51 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 11:00 59 87 51 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 12:00 65 97 51 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 13:00 65 95 52 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 14:00 66 93 51 44
Sunday, April 24, 2022 15:00 66 97 51 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 16:00 59 89 50 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 17:00 56 77 50 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 18:00 56 79 51 42
Sunday, April 24, 2022 19:00 55 77 50 43
Sunday, April 24, 2022 20:00 52 76 48 40
Sunday, April 24, 2022 21:00 52 76 46 38
Sunday, April 24, 2022 22:00 48 67 43 38
Sunday, April 24, 2022 23:00 49 72 42 40
Leq Lmax L50 L90
61 82 50 42
48 65 44 40
52 65 46 38
66 97 52 44
45 60 41 38
50 72 47 43
60 97
60 3
Appendix B2b: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
South West of the Project Boundary
LDL 820-5
Night Average
CAL200
-121.387688°
Sunday, April 24, 2022 Sunday, April 24, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
69 66
60 67
62 60
66 73
65 73 74
87 97
95 93
97 89
77 79 77 76 76
67 72
39 39
42 42
38 39
43 44 43 41 42 42 43 44 44 43 42 42 42 43
40 38 38
40 49
46 48 48 47
45 50 52 53 54 54
59 65 65 66 66
59 56 56 55
52 52
48 49
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
105
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-2
■
■■■•
- ---+--
Site: LT-2
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Monday, April 25, 2022 0:00 48 66 42 41 Coordinates: 38.784781°, Monday, April 25, 2022 1:00 48 71 41 39
Monday, April 25, 2022 2:00 51 79 41 39
Monday, April 25, 2022 3:00 45 64 42 41
Monday, April 25, 2022 4:00 48 63 43 41
Monday, April 25, 2022 5:00 52 74 46 39
Monday, April 25, 2022 6:00 59 80 52 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 7:00 59 76 56 52
Monday, April 25, 2022 8:00 60 79 58 52
Monday, April 25, 2022 9:00 58 80 53 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 10:00 56 79 52 45
Monday, April 25, 2022 11:00 58 80 53 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 12:00 58 78 53 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 13:00 60 80 56 49
Monday, April 25, 2022 14:00 60 80 55 49
Monday, April 25, 2022 15:00 60 84 54 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 16:00 58 76 54 47
Monday, April 25, 2022 17:00 59 83 55 48
Monday, April 25, 2022 18:00 57 78 53 46
Monday, April 25, 2022 19:00 56 78 51 45
Monday, April 25, 2022 20:00 53 69 50 43
Monday, April 25, 2022 21:00 55 77 47 39
Monday, April 25, 2022 22:00 51 74 43 38
Monday, April 25, 2022 23:00 47 66 42 39
Leq Lmax L50 L90
58 78 53 47
52 71 44 40
53 69 47 39
60 84 58 52
45 63 41 38
59 80 52 46
60 89
60 11
Appendix B2c: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
South West of the Project Boundary
LDL 820-5
Night Average
CAL200
-121.387688°
Monday, April 25, 2022 Monday, April 25, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
66 71
79 64 63
74 80
76 79 80 79 80
78 80 80
84 76
83 78 78
69 77
74 66
41 39 39 41 41 39
46 52 52
47 45 46 46
49 49
46 47 48
46 45
43 39 38 39
48 48
51 45
48 52
59 59 60 58
56 58 58
60 60 60
58 59
57 56
53 55
51 47
25 35
45 55
65 75
85 95
Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-2
l ■
■
••• ■
- ---+--
Site: LT-2
Project: Meter:

Leq Lmax L50 L90 Location: Calibrator:

Tuesday, April 26, 2022 0:00 43 62 41 38 Coordinates: 38.784781°, Tuesday, April 26, 2022 1:00 44 66 40 38
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 2:00 41 56 40 37
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 3:00 44 69 40 38
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:00 47 65 42 39
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 5:00 50 69 45 41
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 6:00 57 77 52 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 7:00 60 85 56 51
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 8:00 60 79 58 52
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 9:00 59 77 55 49
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 10:00 59 80 53 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 11:00 64 79 54 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 12:00 64 80 54 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 13:00 62 90 52 44
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 14:00 59 80 55 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 15:00 60 84 55 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 16:00 58 79 54 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 17:00 59 81 53 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 18:00 58 80 54 47
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 19:00 58 84 54 46
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 20:00 55 79 53 45
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 21:00 53 73 50 40
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 22:00 54 82 42 38
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 23:00 51 79 40 37
Leq Lmax L50 L90
60 81 54 47
50 70 42 39
53 73 50 40
64 90 58 52
41 56 40 37
57 82 52 46
60 95
60 5
Appendix B2d: Continuous Noise Monitoring Results
Date Time
Measured Level, dBA Westbrook Regional Soccer Complex
South West of the Project Boundary
LDL 820-5
Night Average
CAL200
-121.387688°
Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Statistics
Day Average
CNEL Night %
Day Low
Day High
Night Low
Night High
Ldn Day %
62 66
56 69
65 69
77 85
79 77
80 79 80
90 80
84 79
81 80
84 79
73 82
79 38 38 37 38 39
41 46
51 52
49 46 46 46
44 47 47 46 46 47 46 45
40 38 37
43 44
41 44
47 50
57 60 60 59 59
64 64 62
59 60
58 59 58 58
55 53 54
51 25
35 45
55 65
75 85
95 Measured Hourly Noise Levels, dBA
Time of Day
Measured Ambient Noise Levels vs. Time of Day
Lmax L90 Leq
Noise Measurement Site
LT-2
■
•••
- ---+--

ATTACHMENT B

DESIGN PLANS
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 VERDE DESIGN, INC. PROJECT NO. 2103800 PREPARED BY 30% SUBMITTAL - 04/29/2022 SHEET C0.0
ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX ORGANIZATION NAME PHONE OWNER CITY OF ROSEVILLE TARA GEE (916) 774-5253 [email protected] LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VERDE DESIGN INC. MARK BAGINSKI (408) 850-3411 [email protected] CHRIS SULLIVAN (916) 996-5525
[email protected] ARCHITECT PUBLIC RESTROOM COMPANY CHARLES E. KAUFMAN (888) 888-2060 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER STANTON ENGINEERING ED DAVID (916) 288-6238 [email protected] STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AKH STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS TIM HYDE (408) 978-1970 [email protected] CONTACT INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: SITE DEMOLITION, CLEAR AND GRUB OF UNDEVELOPED LOT. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF SIX (6) SOCCER FIELDS WITH PERIMETER FENCING, SIX (6) CANTILEVER SHADE STRUCTURES; PLAZA WITH RESTROOM AND CONCESSIONS BUILDINGS AND THREE (3) SOLAR PICNIC SHADE STRUCTURES, PLAY AREA WITH RESTROOM AND SHADE STRUCTURES; NEW PARKING LOT WITH SOLAR SHADE STRUCTURES, NEW HARDSCAPE, LANDSCAPE, SITE UTILITIES, AND PATH OF TRAVEL AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. SPORTS LIGHTING FOR SIX (6) SOCCER FIELDS. SPORTS LIGHTING INFRASTRUCTURE, UNDERGROUND UTILITY AND ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR FUTURE PHASES ALSO TO BE INSTALLED. SCOPE OF WORK BID ADDITIVE ALTERNATE #1: CONSTRUCTION OF TWO (2) SOCCER FIELDS, FOUR (4) CANTILEVAR SOLAR SHADE STRUCTURES, SOUTH PARKING LOT WITH SOLAR SHADE STRUCTURES, PLAZA WITH RESTROOM AND CONCESSIONS BUILDINGS, SOLAR PICNIC SHADE STRUCTURES AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, HARDSCAPE, FURNISHINGS, UTILITIES AND ELECTRICAL. BID ALTERNATES PROJECT MAP VICINITY MAP SITE MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH NOT TO SCALE NORTH PROJECT INFORMATION: TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA = X SQ. FT. PROJECT TYPE: NEW PUBLIC PARK WATER DISTRICT NAME: CITY OF ROSEVILLE WATER UTILITY (916) 774-5750 POWER UTILITY PROVIDER: CITY OF ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC UTILITY (916) 797-6937 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE. __________ _______ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ______________ DATE CITY OF ROSEVILLE APPROVAL CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITY ENGINEER DATE CWJ # EN # BD# WDID # 65 65 80 PROJECT SITE

WESTBROOK BLVD

PLEASANT GROOVE BLVDBLUE OAKS BLVD WESTBROOK BLVD
PHILLIP RD LIMIT OF WORK SHEET INDEX SHEET NO. SHEET DESCRIPTION C0.0 COVER SHEET C0.1 PUBLIC IMPROEMENT REQUIREMENT NOTES L0.1 ACCESSIBILITY PLAN L0.2 ACCESSIBILITY PLAN L1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.6 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.7 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.8 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.9 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.11 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.13 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L2.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.5 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.6 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.7 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.8 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.9 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.10 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.11 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.12 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.13 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.14 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L3.1 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.2 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.3 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.4 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.5 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.6 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.7 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.8 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.9 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.10 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.11 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.12 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.13 DEMOLITION PLAN L3.14 DEMOLITION PLAN L4.1 GRADING PLAN L4.2 GRADING PLAN L4.3 GRADING PLAN L4.4 GRADING PLAN L4.5 GRADING PLAN L4.6 GRADING PLAN L4.7 GRADING PLAN L4.8 GRADING PLAN L4.9 GRADING PLAN L4.10 GRADING PLAN L4.11 GRADING PLAN L4.12 GRADING PLAN L4.13 GRADING PLAN L4.14 GRADING PLAN L5.1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.2 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.3 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.5 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.6 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.7 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.8 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.9 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.10 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.11 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.12 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.13 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L5.14 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN L6.1 LAYOUT PLAN L6.2 LAYOUT PLAN L6.3 LAYOUT PLAN L6.4 LAYOUT PLAN L6.5 LAYOUT PLAN L6.6 LAYOUT PLAN L6.7 LAYOUT PLAN L6.8 LAYOUT PLAN L6.9 LAYOUT PLAN L6.10 LAYOUT PLAN L6.11 LAYOUT PLAN L6.12 LAYOUT PLAN L6.13 LAYOUT PLAN L6.14 LAYOUT PLAN L7.1 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.2 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.3 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.4 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.5 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.6 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.7 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.8 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.9 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.10 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.11 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.12 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.13 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L7.14 MATERIAL AND DETAIL REFERENCE PLAN L8.1 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.2 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.3 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.4 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.5 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.6 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.7 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.8 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.9 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.10 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.11 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.12 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.13 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.14 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.15 IRRIGATION PLAN L8.16 IRRIGATION PLAN L9.1 PLANTING PLAN L9.2 PLANTING PLAN L9.3 PLANTING PLAN L9.4 PLANTING PLAN L9.5 PLANTING PLAN L9.6 PLANTING PLAN L9.7 PLANTING PLAN L9.8 PLANTING PLAN L9.9 PLANTING PLAN L9.10 PLANTING PLAN L9.11 PLANTING PLAN L9.12 PLANTING PLAN L9.13 PLANTING PLAN L9.14 PLANTING PLAN LD1.1 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY DETAILS LD1.2 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY DETAILS LD2.1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS HARDSCAPE LD2.2 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS SITE FURNISHINGS LD3.1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS LD4.1 FENCING DETAILS LD4.2 FENCING DETAILS LD5.1 ATHLETIC DTAILS LD5.2 PLAY EQUIPMENT LD6.1 IRRIGATION AND PLANTING DETAILS LD6.2 IRRIGATION AND PLANTING DETAILS E0.1 ELECTRICAL COVER SHEET E0.2 ONE-LINE DIAGRAM & LOAD CALCULATIONS E0.3 ELECTRICAL BUILDING PLAN AND DETAILS E1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS 1. 2019 CBC CHAPTER 35: PROVIDE ALL THE APPLICABLE/ADOPTED STANDARDS. WHERE A PARTICULAR STANDARD IS REFERENCED IN THE CODE BUT DOES NOT APPEAR AS AN ADOPTED STANDARD IT MAY STILL BE USED. APPLY ONLY THE PORTION OF THE STANDARD THAT IS APPLICABLE TO THE CODE SECTION WHERE THE STANDARD IS REFERENCED, NOT THE ENTIRE STANDARD. 2019 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PART 1, TITLE 24 C.C.R. 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE VOLUMES 1-2 AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), PART 3, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) PART 4, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2018 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CDC), PART 5, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2018 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, PART 6, TITLE 24 C.C.R. 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, PART 10, TITLE 24 C.C.R. (2018 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND 2016 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2019 CALIFORNIA "GREEN" BUILDING REQUIREMENTS OR CAL GREEN, PART 11, TITLE 24 C.C.R. 2019 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART 12, TITLE 24 C.C.R. 2019 TITLE 19 C.C.R., PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE FIRE MARSHAL REGULATIONS. 2016 ASME A17.1/CSA B44-13 SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND ESCALATORS LIST OF FEDERAL CODES AND STANDARDS (IF APPLICABLE) AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), TITLE II OR TITLE III FOR TITLE II: UNIFORM FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS (UFAS) 28 CFR 35.151(c) OR ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN (APPENDIX A OF 28 CFR PART 36) FOR TITLE III: ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN (APPENDIX A OF 28 CFR PART 36) 28 CFR 36.406 2010 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN NOTE: TITLE II APPLIES TO PROJECTS FUNDED AND/OR USED BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. TITLE III COVERS PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND COMMERCIAL FACILITIES. DEPENDING ON THE USE AND FUNDING, BOTH TITLE MAY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. NFPA 13 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA AMENDED) 2019 EDITION NFPA 14 STANDPIPE SYSTEMS 2019 EDITION NFPA 17 DRY CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS 2017 EDITION NFPA 17A WET CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS 2017 EDITION NFPA 20 STATIONARY FIRE PUMPS 2019 EDITION NFPA 22 WATER TANKS FOR PRIVATE FIRE PROTECTION 2018 EDITION NFPA 24 PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE MAINS 2019 EDITION NFPA 72 NATIONAL FIRE ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE (CALIFORNIA AMENDED) 2019 EDITION (NOTE SEE UL STANDARD 1971 FOR "VISUAL DEVICES) NFPA 80 FIRE DOORS AND OTHER OPENING PROTECTIVES 2019 EDITION NFPA 253 CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS 2019 EDITION NFPA 2001 CLEAN AGENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS 2018 EDITION UL 300 FIRE TESTING OF FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS FOR PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL 2005 (R2010) COOKING EQUIPMENT UL 464 AUDIBLE SIGNALING DEVICES FOR FIRE ALARM AND SIGNALING SYSTEMS, 2003 EDITION INCLUDING ADDESSORIES UL 521 HEAT DETECTORS FOR FIRE PROTECTIVE SIGNALING SYSTEMS 1999 EDITION UL 1971 SIGNALING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED 2002 EDITION ICC 300 BLEACHERS, FOLDING AND TELESCOPING SEATING, AND GRANDSTANDS 2017 EDITION ASME 17.1 ELEVATOR STANDARD 2016 EDITION REFERENCE CODE SECTIONS FOR APPLICABLE STANDARDS - 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (FOR SFM) REFERENCED STANDARDS CHAPTER 35 ADA STANDARD FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN (APPENDIX A OF 28 CFR PART 36) 2. THE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS THAT WORK OF THE ALTERATION, REHABILITATION OR RECONSTRUCTION IS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS. SHOULD ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS SUCH AS DETERIORATION OR NON-COMPLYING CONSTRUCTION BE DISCOVERED WHICH IS NOT COVERED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WHEREIN THE FINISHED WORK WILL NOT COMPLY WITH TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, A CHANGE ORDER, OR A SEPARATE SET OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, DETAILING AND SPECIFYING THE REQUIRED WORK SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 3. ALL EXISTING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH UL 300, CBC 904.11, CFC 904.11. 4. LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 5. LATEST EDITION OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE PARKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. I ' \ ' ! ' L-~- 1 L--~-- EXPIRATION DATE: c.P..., JULY 2023
/-1 --------~~ /[' OF CAL \'i_W,

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHllKTURE

CML ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1 843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel1 916..415.6554
lax, 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDeslgnlnc.com
_______......_.a kl,._____
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, INC.
1505 MBRIDIAN AVB, sum B
SAN JOSB, CALIFORNIA '5125
PHONE 40Ul'8.19JO
www.AJJISB.com
ti '"PUBLIC RESTROOM COMPANY
Building Better Places To Go.5"
Ph: 888-888-2060 I Fax: 888-888-1448
Stanton

E NG I NEERI NG
PROJEcCT 2005 1
11344
Coloma Rd, Suite 445
Gold Rivor, CA 95670
TlaL 916.288.62.SO
www.stantoner19.com
S>+ EI
SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENT NOTES MB 1"=20'-0" C0.1 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENT NOTES PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS GRADING: 1. GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX CHAPTER 33 UBC, LATEST EDITION, AND TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT TITLED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT GIBSON PARK. REFER TO ENGINEERING DIVISION FILE #308-_______________ FOR SOILS REPORT. 2. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS SPECIFIED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR THIS PROJECT OR AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. THE SWPPP IS CONSIDERED A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT AND WILL CHANGE AS CONDITIONS WARRANT. PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN ON THE PRE-DEVELOPED SWPPP PLAN. REFER TO STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ___________________________________________________________________. 3. LOTS SHALL BE GRADED WITH A CONSTANT SLOPE ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, FROM BUILDING SETBACK LINE TO BACK OF SIDEWALK. ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 ALONG THIS FRONTAGE SHALL HAVE EROSION NETTING INSTALLED. 4. ALL REAR LOT CORNER ELEVATIONS SHALL BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE HIGHEST ADJACENT PAD GRADE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS AND APPROVED BY ENGINEERING DIVISION. 5. NON-POTABLE WATER SHALL BE SPRAYED ON ALL EXPOSED EARTH SURFACES DURING CLEARING GRADING, EARTH MOVING, AND OTHER SITE PREPARATION ACTIVITIES. THE EXPOSED EARTH SHALL BE WATERED THROUGHOUT THE DAY TO MINIMIZE DUST. 6. TARPAULINS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS SHALL BE USED ON ALL STOCKPILED EARTH MATERIAL AND ON HAUL TRUCKS TO MINIMIZE DUST. 7. THE CITY SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO STOP ALL GRADING OPERATIONS, IF, IN OPINION OF CITY STAFF, INADEQUATE DUST CONTROL MEASURES ARE BEING PRACTICED OR EXCESSIVE WIND CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTE TO FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS. 8. ADJACENT STREET FRONTAGES SHALL BE SWEPT AT LEAST ONCE A DAY TO REMOVE SILT AND OTHER DIRT WHICH IS EVIDENT FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. REFER TO SCHEDULES WITHIN SWPPP. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES LEAVING THE SITE ON A DAILY BASIS TO PREVENT DUST, SILT AND DIRT FROM BEING RELEASED OR TRACKED OFFSITE. REFER TO SWPPP FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS. 10. CONSTRUCTION SHALL STOP IF CULTURAL RESOURCES ARE SUSPECTED. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT PREVIOUS ACTIVITIES HAVE OBSCURED SURFACE EVIDENCE OF CULTURAL RESOURCES. IF SIGNS OF AN ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE, SUCH AS ANY UNUSUAL AMOUNTS OF STONE, BONE, OR SHELL, ARE UNCOVERED DURING GRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, WORK SHALL BE HALTED WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE FIND AND THE ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED. A QUALIFIED ARCHEOLOGIST SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR AN ON-SITE EVALUATION. THE ARCHEOLOGIST MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MITIGATION. 11. SHOULD GRADING OPERATIONS UNCOVER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, OR WHAT APPEARS TO BE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SHALL BE CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY AT (916) 774-5820. THE AREA, WHICH CONTAINS THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SHALL BE MARKED OFF UNTIL AN INVESTIGATION BY A MEMBER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS CONDUCTED. 12. GRADES SHOWN OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WITHIN THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN ARE SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. 13. THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER IS EXPECTED TO COMPLY WITH THE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FROM THE PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT: WWW.PLACER.CA.GOV/APCD 14. CONTAMINATED SOIL - DEVELOPER AGREES TO PROPERLY ADHERE TO ALL THEN CURRENT STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN ANY EVIDENCE OF TOXIC, HAZARDOUS OR CONTAMINATED SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING ANY AND ALL EXCAVATION OR GRADING OPERATIONS, AND TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OR ROSEVILLE, ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIMS, FEES, FINES, PENALTIES AND CLAIMS OF OR DAMAGE OF ANY TYPE WHATSOEVER. EXTRA COSTS FOR REMEDIATION AND/OR REMOVAL OF SOIL SHALL BE BOURN SOLELY BY THE DEVELOPER. THE PARTIES INTEND THAT THIS PROVISION BE BROADLY CONSTRUED. AIR QUALITY: THE FOLLOWING NOTES ARE PROVIDED AS REFERENCE TO APPLICABLE PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT ADOPTED RULES AND REGULATIONS. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE APCD RULES IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. AIR QUALITY RULES ARE ENFORCED SOLELY BY THE PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 1. CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT EXHAUST EMISSIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED PLACER COUNTY APCD RULE 202 VISIBLE EMISSION LIMITATIONS. OPERATORS OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FOUND TO EXCEED OPACITY LIMITS ARE TO BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED BY APCD TO CEASE OPERATIONS AND THE EQUIPMENT MUST BE REPAIRED WITHIN 72 HOURS. (BASED ON APCD RULE 202) 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUSPEND ALL GRADING OPERATIONS WHEN FUGITIVE DUST EXCEEDS PLACER COUNTY APCD RULE 228 (FUGITIVE DUST) LIMITATIONS. THE PRIME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HAVING AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS CARB-CERTIFIED TO PERFORM VISIBLE EMISSIONS EVALUATIONS (VEE). THIS INDIVIDUAL SHALL EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 228 ON A WEEKLY BASIS. IT IS TO BE NOTED THAT FUGITIVE DUST IS NOT TO EXCEED 40% OPACITY AND NOT GO BEYOND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY AT ANY TIME. LIME OR OTHER DRYING AGENTS UTILIZED TO DRY OUT WET GRADING AREAS SHALL NOT EXCEED PLACER COUNTY APCD RULE 228 FUGITIVE DUST LIMITATIONS. OPERATORS OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FOUND TO EXCEED OPACITY LIMITS WILL BE NOTIFIED BY APCD AND THE EQUIPMENT MUST BE REPAIRED WITHIN 72 HOURS. ALL PROJECTS IN EXCESS OF 5 ACRES SHALL HAVE AN APPROVED DUST CONTROL PLAN FROM THE PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. (BASED ON APCD RULE 228) 3. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC SPEEDS ON ALL UNPAVED SURFACES SHALL BE LIMITED TO 15 MILES PER HOUR OR LESS. (BASED ON APCD RULE 228 / SECTION 401.2) 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, NO OPEN BURNING OF REMOVED VEGETATION SHALL BE ALLOWED UNLESS PERMITTED BY THE PCAPCD. ALL REMOVED VEGETATIVE MATERIAL SHALL BE EITHER CHIPPED ON SITE OR TAKEN TO AN APPROPRIATE RECYCLING SITE, OR IF A SITE IS NOT AVAILABLE, A LICENSED DISPOSAL SITE. (BASED ON APCD RULE 310) 5. A PERSON SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO THE ATMOSPHERE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (YOC'S) CAUSED BY THE USE OR MANUFACTURE OF CUTBACK OR EMULSIFIED ASPHALTS FOR PAVING, ROAD CONSTRUCTION OR ROAD MAINTENANCE, UNLESS SUCH MANUFACTURE OR USE COMPLIES WITH THE PROVISIONS RULE 217. (BASED ON APCD RULE 217). 6. PROCESSES THAT DISCHARGE 2 POUNDS PER DAY OR MORE OF AIR CONTAMINANTS, AS DEFINED BY HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 39013, TO THE ATMOSPHERE MAY REQUIRE A PERMIT. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED FOR BOTH CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION. DEVELOPERS/CONTRACTORS SHOULD CONTACT THE DISTRICT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. (BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH & SAFETY CODE SECTION 39013: HTTP:/NI/WW.LEGINFO.CA.GOV/CGI-BINIDISPLAYCODE?SECTION-HSC&GROUP =39001-40000&FILE=39010-39060 EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL: 1. THE STATE'S GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WQD 99-080-DWQ) REQUIRES THE PREPARATION OF A STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) FOR SITES WITH SOIL DISTURBANCES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE, OR FROM SITES SMALLER THAN ONE ACRE IF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS PART OF A LARGER PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE THAT DISTURBS ONE ACRE OR MORE. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL NOT COMMENCE, NOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING PERMITTED TO BE SCHEDULED, PRIOR TO THE SWPPP BEING ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. FOR MORE INFORMATION SEE; HTTP://WWW.ROSEVILLE.CA.US/EU/STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT 2. THE PROJECT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS SET OF PLANS (REFER TO GRADING NOTE #2, THIS SHEET). THE SWPPP IS CONSIDERED A DYNAMIC DOCUMENT AND WILL CHANGE AS CONDITIONS WARRANT. PERMANENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 3. A COPY OF THE SWPPP SHALL BE KEPT AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. 4. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS SPECIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY INSPECTOR. 5. NO GRADING OR TRENCHING, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED FOR EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL, SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 35 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF PERENNIAL AND INTERMITTENT DRAINAGE SWALES BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15 EXCEPT AS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. 6. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC SITE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT FOR MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR ANY OTHER ACTIVITY THAT MAY ADVERSELY CONTRIBUTE TO THE WATER QUALITY OF THE RUNOFF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP. 8. CITY OF ROSEVILLE GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THESE PLANS AND THE LATEST EDITION AND AMENDMENTS OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 2. THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE IS A MEMBER OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (U.S.A.) ONE-CALL SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY THE U.S.A. CENTER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION WORK BY CALLING 1-800-227-2600. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK IN WHITE PAINT ALL AREAS TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO CONTACTING U.S.A. ANY AREAS NOT MARKED WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO U.S.A., AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM EXCAVATION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXPOSE AND VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS CONNECTING TO OR IN THE VICINITY OF THE SAME. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING MONUMENTS AND OTHER SURVEY MARKERS ON THE JOB SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE BOXED SURVEY MONUMENTS WITH 1-1/2" BRONZE HEAD SET IN CONCRETE (STD. DWG. ST-36) AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 7. A.C. SURFACE SHALL BE CUT TO A NEAT, STRAIGHT LINE PARALLEL WITH THE STREET CENTERLINE AND THE EXPOSED EDGE SHALL BE TACKED WITH EMULSION PRIOR TO PAVING. THE EXPOSED BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADED, RE-COMPACTED, AND RESEALED PRIOR TO PAVING. 8. ANY EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE SAW CUT TO A NEAT, STRAIGHT LINE. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN THAT SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS BEFORE START OF WORK IN RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA MUTCD LATEST EDITION. AT LEAST ONE LANE IN EACH DIRECTION SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. TRAFFIC CONTROL HOURS ARE SUBJECT TO LIMITATION BY THE CITY. TRAFFIC CONTROL WITH LANE CLOSURES THAT AFFECT TRAFFIC FLOW MAY REQUIRE NIGHT WORK. IF, AS A PART OF TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES, A ROADWAY CLOSURE HAS BEEN APPROVED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF SETTING UP THIS CLOSURE. 10. CURB RAMPS CONFORMING TO ALL ADA AND TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL NEW STANDARD CURB RETURNS (STANDARD DRAWING ST-27) AND STANDARD TYPE A-7 DRIVEWAYS. WHERE EXISTING RAMPS DO NOT MEET CURRENT ADA AND TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS, THE RAMPS SHALL BE UPGRADED IN CONFORMANCE WITH MINIMUM TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS. WHERE EXISTING RAMPS DO NOT INCLUDE DETECTABLE WARNING PANELS (TRUNCATED DOMES), PANELS SHALL BE RETROFITTED PER THE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 11. DRAIN INLETS NOT WITHIN A PAVED AREA SHALL HAVE A 12" WIDE COLLAR OF 6" THICK P.C.C. OR 2" THICK A.C. DRAIN INLETS INSTALLED IN MULCHED PLANTER AREAS SHALL HAVE A 12" WIDE COLLAR OF 2" TO 6" COBBLE PLACED OVER FILTER FABRIC. 12. PRIOR TO THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION ON ALL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS, THE DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT A LETTER FROM THE POST OFFICE STATING THAT ITS REQUIREMENTS FOR MAILBOX CLUSTER PADS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 13. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED CITY OF ROSEVILLE EASEMENTS SHALL REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 90% COMPACTION ON THE TRENCH BACKFILL. COMPACTION OF BACKFILL BY JETTING IS NOT PERMITTED IN CITY OF ROSEVILLE RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT AREAS OR WITHIN DEDICATED RECLAIMED WATER, STORM, SEWER OR WATER EASEMENTS AND MAINS. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING ONE-WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND ALL OTHER UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES SHALL BE NOTIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS TO THE DATE AND LOCATION OF THE MEETING. 15. PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OF TRENCHES 5 FEET OR DEEPER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT OR ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL CALOSHA TRENCHING PERMIT AND A COPY OF THE COMPANY'S LETTER INFORMING CALOSHA OF THE TIME THE TRENCHING IS COMMENCING AND THE LOCATION OF THE WORK. 16. ALL PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPES, ARROWS, AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL TO THE SPECIFICATIONS SET FORTH IN CHAPTER 3 OF THE CALIFORNIA MUTCD LATEST EDITION. NON-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL CONSIST OF CERAMIC MARKERS ONLY CONFORMING TO CHAPTER 3 OF THE CALIFORNIA MUTCD LATEST EDITION. 17. THE DEVELOPERS CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE EXTREME CARE TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE AND ADJACENT IMPROVEMENTS FROM DAMAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR OR MAKE REPLACEMENT OF ALL CRACKED AND OTHERWISE PRE-EXISTING DAMAGED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION TO CURRENT CITY STANDARDS AND AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE. THE EXTENT OF THE REPAIRS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR AND SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE CITY ACCEPTANCE OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. 18. WHERE COMBINATIONS OF SIDEWALK OR CURB AND GUTTER ARE PLACED CONTIGUOUS TO EXISTING, ALL ADJOINING EXISTING CONCRETE VERTICAL FACES SHALL BE DOWELED. ALL ABUTTING SIDEWALK ENDS SHALL BE DOWELED MID-SECTION VERTICALLY WITH TWO DOWELS FOR FOUR THROUGH SIX-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK AND THREE DOWELS FOR WIDER SIDEWALK. ABUTTING CURB AND GUTTER ENDS SHALL BE DOWELED TWICE, 18 INCHES APART AT GUTTER PAN MID-SECTION. DOWEL CONNECTIONS OF LONGITUDINAL RUNS OF SIDEWALK TO BACK OF CURB SHALL BE THREE FEET ON CENTER. ALL DOWELS SHALL BE 16 INCHES LONG, GRADE 60; #4 REBAR PENETRATING FOUR INCHES. THE DOWEL HOLE SHALL BE 5/8-INCH DIAMETER AT A SLIGHT HORIZONTAL ANGLE FROM PERPENDICULAR. THE PENETRATING PORTION OF THE DOWEL AND THE ENTIRE (CLEANED) VERTICAL SURFACE OF THE ADJOINING, EXISTING CONCRETE SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COATED WITH STATE STANDARD TWO-PART EPOXY. 19. WHEN SAWCUTTING WITHIN THE STREET FOR TRENCHING OR OTHER PURPOSES, CONTRACTOR SHALL GRIND 1½” OF PAVEMENT BETWEEN THE LANE LINES (FROM LANE STRIPE TO LANE STRIPE) UPON COMPLETION OF THE SAWCUTTING AND OR TRENCHING WORK. WHERE THE SAWCUTTING OCCURS BETWEEN THE CURB AND GUTTER AND NEAREST LANE STRIPE (INCLUDING BIKE LANES), THE SAME 1 ½” GRIND SHALL BE REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR TO PLACE A PETROMAT FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND OVERLAY FROM LANE STRIPE TO LANE STRIPE, OR CURB TO LANE STRIPE AND RESTRIPE OR REPLACE ANY DELINEATORS REMOVED DURING THE GRIND. 20. ALL PUBLICLY MAINTAINED STORM DRAIN ON PRIVATE PROPERTY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND SHALL BE RCP CL IV, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 21. FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING, THE FINAL GRADING OF THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO ACCOMMODATE A MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY SLOPE OF 14% FOR EACH RESIDENTIAL LOT, AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK TO THE GARAGE (20-FT SET BACK). IT WILL REMAIN THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BUILDERS/DEVELOPER TO DESIGN A HOUSE THAT PROVIDES SUITABLE ACCESS TO THE PARCEL. 22. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN THE INITIAL BEDDING AND BACKFILL AND THE TRENCH BACKFILL FOR SANITARY SEWERS DEPTH GREATER THAN 15 FEET MEASURED TO THE PIPE INVERT. GENERAL FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES 1. AN APPROVED PROJECT SIGN SHALL BE PLACED AT VEHICLE ACCESS POINTS INTO THE PROJECT DURING CONSTRUCTION TO ASSIST EMERGENCY RESPONDERS. THE SIGN SHALL IDENTIFY THE ADDRESS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. SUCH SIGNS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE AND LEGIBLE FROM THE STREET FRONTING THE PROJECT. 2. PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS BEING BROUGHT TO THE SITE, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO WITHIN 150 FEET OF ALL STRUCTURES AND COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE PILES. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE FULLY PAVED AND SHALL BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE IMPOSED WEIGHT OF A FIRE APPARATUS (34 TONS GVW), UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MINIMUM 20-FOOT ROADWAY WIDTH AND 13 FOOT 6 INCH VERTICAL CLEARANCE. 3. PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS BEING BROUGHT TO THE SITE, ANY REQUIRED ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE ROSEVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 4. CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL AND VEHICLES SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS TO FIRE APPARATUS ROADS, FIRE HYDRANTS OR THE BUILDING. 5. BARRICADES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO PROTECT ANY NATURAL GAS METER, FIRE HYDRANT, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTROL DEVICE, OR OTHER POSSIBLE PERTINENT EQUIPMENT OR DEVICES THAT MAY BE SUBJECT TO VEHICULAR DAMAGE. 6. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 3-FOOT CLEAR SPACE AROUND FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT. 7. THE BURNING OF COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND TRASH IS PROHIBITED. 8. ASPHALT AND TAR KETTLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 20 FEET OF ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL, COMBUSTIBLE BUILDING SURFACE OR BUILDING OPENING. AN ATTENDANT SHALL BE WITHIN 100 FEET OF A KETTLE WHEN THE HEAT SOURCE IS OPERATING. A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) 20B:C PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET OF THE KETTLE, AND ON THE ROOF DURING ASPHALT COATING OPERATIONS. 9. DRYWALL AND OTHER TEMPORARY HEATING DEVICES SHALL BE OF AN APPROVED TYPE, LOCATED AWAY FROM COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS AND ATTENDED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. HEATING DEVICES SHALL NOT BE OPERATED AFTER NORMAL WORKING HOURS WITHOUT BEING ATTENDED TO ON AN HOURLY BASIS. 10. CUTTING AND WELDING OPERATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE HOT WORK PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 35 OF THE FIRE CODE. A FIRE WATCH SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING HOT-WORK ACTIVITIES AND SHALL CONTINUE FOR A MINIMUM OF 30 MINUTES AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE WORK. 11. IF SITE SURVEY OR EARTH MOVING WORK RESULTS IN THE DISCOVERY OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN CONTAINERS, OR WHAT APPEARS TO BE HAZARDOUS WASTES RELEASED INTO THE GROUND, THE CONTRACTOR OR APPLICANT SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT THE FINDING TO THE ROSEVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT VIA PHONE AT (916) 774-5800. ALL SUSPECTED AREAS SHALL BE MARKED OFF WITH APPROVED SIGNAGE OR CAUTION TAPE UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT A REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES WHETHER THE RELEASE IS REPORTABLE OR NOT AND IF SITE REMEDIATION IS REQUIRED. 12. FIRE SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 33 OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE. 13. ADEQUATE RADIO COVERAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN BUILDINGS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AGENCIES, AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE. 14. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN OCCUPANCIES AND LOCATIONS AS SET FORTH IN THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CHIEF. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITHIN EACH TENANT SPACE. THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TO THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHALL NOT EXCEED 75-FEET. THE MINIMUM RATING CLASSIFICATION FOR THE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 2A-10B:C. THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM ANY POINT IN A LIGHT HAZARD AREA OF CLASS A HAZARDS SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 75 FEET FROM A CLASS 2A-10B:C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER AND ONE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 6,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM ANY POINT IN AN ORDINARY HAZARD OF CLASS A HAZARDS AREA SHALL NOT BE MORE THAN 75 FEET AND ONE EXTINGUISHER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 3,000 SQUARE FEET. THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE TO CLASS B EXTINGUISHERS IS EITHER 30 FEET OR 50 FEET DEPENDING UPON THE SIZE OF THE EXTINGUISHER AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE HAZARD. REFER TO UFC STANDARD NO. 10-1 FOR COMPLETE REQUIREMENTS. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL HAVE A SERVICE TAG AFFIXED TO THEM SHOWING THAT THE EXTINGUISHER HAS BEEN SERVICED BY A CALIFORNIA STATE LICENSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CONCERN. ALL FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE ATTACHED TO A BRACKET OR WITHIN AN APPROVED CABINET. MAXIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE FLOOR SHALL NOT EXCEED 54-INCHES. SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED ABOVE THE EXTINGUISHER AND SHALL READ FIRE EXTINGUISHER. 15. THE REQUIRED MINIMUM FIRE FLOW FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS ___ GALLONS PER MINUTE WITH 20 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH RESIDUAL WATER PRESSURE REMAINING IN THE SYSTEM. A CHANGE IN ANY OF THE CONDITIONS MAY INCREASE THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW. 16. ALL UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE SHALL BE HYDRAULICALLY PRESSURED AT 200 PSI FOR TWO-HOURS PER THE NFPA STANDARD FOR UNDERGROUND FIRE WATER LINE. AN INSPECTION SHALL BE REQUIRED TO WITNESS THE TEST WITH A SUBSEQUENT INSPECTION AFTER THE TWO-HOUR DURATION HAS EXPIRED. 17. TEMPORARY USE OF ON-SITE GENERATORS WITH OVER 60 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL SHALL REQUIRE A FIRE DEPARTMENT PERMIT AND MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CHAPTER 6.95 OF THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE, THE ROSEVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE NATIONAL FIRE CODES. CONTACT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AT 916-774-5800 TO INITIATE THE PERMIT APPLICATION. 18. SECTION 10.6.2 OF NFPA 24 HAS BEEN AMENDED NOT TO ALLOW MECHANICAL JOINTS UNDER BUILDINGS. SEE CHAPTER 80 OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PAGE 519. PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED RISER AND UNDERGROUND DETAIL TO THE PAD. 19. CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL BE RESUBMITTED IF IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED BY THE APPLICANT THAT AN ON-SITE FIRE PUMP WILL BE REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF SUPPLYING 100 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE AT THE STANDPIPE ROOF OUTLET ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 14, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STANDPIPE AND HOSE SYSTEMS. 20. THE SUBMITTED PRIVATE UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (EUD) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT (RFD) PRIOR TO REQUESTING FOR THE REQUIRED INSPECTION FROM THE RFD. THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS WILL NOT BE APPROVED BY THE RFD UNTIL THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE LATERAL HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE RFD. 21. ALL PROPOSED BURIED BOLTS SHALL BE COATED WITH A LISTED PRODUCT SUCH AS CHRISTY'S HD-50. 22. ACCORDING TO NFPA 13, 6.3.1.1.1, THE UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE BUILDING FURTHER THAN 24 INCHES. 23. AN 18 AWG MINIMUM GAUGE TRACER WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG ALL NON-METALLIC UNDERGROUND PIPING IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 604 OF THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE. NOTATIONS SHALL BE MADE ON THE RESUBMITTAL. 24. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION(S) SHALL BE WITHIN 2-FEET OF BACK OF CURB OR BACK OF WALKWAY, AND SHALL REMAIN UNOBSTRUCTED AT ALL TIMES. 25. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LABELED WITH THE APPROPRIATE ADDRESS. 26. MECHANICAL JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT AREAS NOTED PER THE EBBA THRUST RESTRAINT DESIGN PROGRAM SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALL AND AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE MONITORING OF ALL FIRE PROTECTION DEVICES. 28. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLING GROUND MATERIALS. 29. TO SCHEDULE A FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION FOR ANY ON-SITE WORK, FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS USING THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CITIZEN PORTAL AT PERMITSONLINE.ROSEVILLE.CA.US. THE FOLLOWING BD NUMBER BELOW SHALL BE USED WHEN SCHEDULING A FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION. A BD NUMBER WILL BE ISSUED UPON APPROVAL. ALL INQUIRING REGARDING INSPECTIONS AND PERMIT FEES SHALL BE MADE BY CALLING (916) 774-5332. BD__________________. GENERAL NOTES 1. PRIOR TO BIDDING, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT & INSPECT THE SITE & FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE NEW WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DISPUTE, COMPLAIN OR ASSERT THAT THERE IS ANY MISUNDERSTANDING IN REGARDS TO LOCATION, EXTENT, NATURE OR AMOUNT OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO INSPECT THE SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY CONDITIONS, REQUIRING WORK, WHICH ARE NOT COVERED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 2. NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE WITHOUT THE OFFICIAL NOTICE TO PROCEED FROM THE OWNER. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR & SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING & VERIFYING ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN ALL AREAS OF NEW WORK PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EXCAVATION. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE ROUTING LOCATIONS AS BEST DETERMINED FROM EXISTING DRAWINGS AND THE OWNER, BUT SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED TO REPRESENT ALL OF THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY NEW FACILITIES IN THIS CONTRACT. VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION AND DEPTH OF UTILITIES, AND REPORT POTENTIAL CONFLICTS TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO EXCAVATING FOR NEW FACILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT, IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO EXISTING UTILITIES CAUSED BY ITS OPERATIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ITEMS WITHIN SITE IMPROVEMENTS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ALL DAMAGED AREAS TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 6. DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXISTING FACILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER. 7. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES, AS WELL AS ADAPTED STANDARDS. 8. ALL NOTES ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH, AND AS A SUPPLEMENT TO, THE WRITTEN SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS SET FOR IN THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS REPORT, GIBSON PARK, PREPARED BY WALLACE-KUHL & ASSOCIATES, INCLUDED BY REFERENCE. 9. THIS DRAWING SET SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE FORMAT SPECIFICATIONS PUBLISHED IN BOOK FORM. COMBINED, THEY ARE HEREIN REFERRED TO AS THE "CONTRACT DOCUMENTS". 10. DIMENSIONS ON WORKING DRAWINGS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER MEASURED ELEMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. 11. ALL TYPICAL DETAILS SHALL APPLY UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE DUST CONTROL AND KEEP MUD AND DEBRIS OFF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AT ALL TIMES. 13. ALL TRENCHES AND EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA AND FEDERAL O.S.H.A. REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER APPLICABLE SAFETY ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BEAR FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRENCH SHORING DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 14. ANY ALTERATIONS OF EXISTING FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK SHALL BE REVIEWED BY THE OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK TO AVOID DISTURBING NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS DURING WORK HOURS. ANY DISRUPTION OF THE UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND INSPECTOR OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 16. ALL TEMPORARY WORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED A PART OF THIS CONTRACT AND NO EXTRA CHARGES WILL BE ALLOWED. THIS SHALL INCLUDE MINOR ITEMS OF MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AND INTENT OF THE PROJECT. 17. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT UNDERTAKE TO SHOW OR LIST EVERY ITEM TO BE PROVIDED, BUT RATHER TO DEFINE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A FULL AND WORKING SYSTEM FROM THE STANDPOINT OF THE END USER. FOR THIS REASON, WHEN AN ITEM NOT SHOWN OR LISTED IS CLEARLY NECESSARY FOR PROPER CONTROL/OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT WHICH IS SHOWN OR LISTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AN ITEM WHICH WILL ALLOW THE SYSTEM TO FUNCTION PROPERLY AT NO INCREASE IN PRICE. 18. ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL REMOVE TRASH AND DEBRIS STEMMING FROM THEIR WORK ON A DAILY BASIS. PROJECT SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CLEAN AND ORDERLY CONDITION. 19. THE DETAILS REFLECT THE DESIGN INTENT FOR TYPICAL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND SHALL INCLUDE, IN HIS SCOPE, THE COST FOR COMPLETE FINISHED INSTALLATIONS, INCLUDING ANOMALIES, OF ALL TRADES. 20. NO WORK SHALL COMMENCE WITH UNAPPROVED MATERIALS. ANY WORK DONE WITH UNAPPROVED MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IS AT THE CONTRACTOR'S RISK AND IS SUBJECT TO REJECTION AND REPLACEMENT. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBMITTAL AND SUBSTITUTION REQUIREMENTS. 21. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS STORED ON THE SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY STACKED AND PROTECTED SO AS TO PREVENT DAMAGE OR DETERIORATION UNTIL USED. FAILURE IN THIS REGARD MAY BE CAUSE FOR REJECTION OF MATERIAL AND/OR WORK. 22. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE FABRICATED FROM FIELD VERIFIED DIMENSIONS AND APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS. COORDINATE MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THEIR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS IN A MANNER WHICH WILL NOT ALLOW HARMFUL POLLUTANTS TO ENTER THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (BMP) AS OUTLINED IN THE BROCHURES ENTITLED "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY" ISSUED BY THE CALIFORNIA STORM WATER QUALITY ASSOCIATION, NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM, AS FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENT FOR SWPPP, TO SUIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND JOB CONDITION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESENT HIS PROPOSED BMP AND SWPPP DOCUMENTATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING FOR DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING PER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO SERVE LIMIT OF WORK AREAS. FENCING MAY BE ADJUSTED DURING CONSTRUCTION BASED ON CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OR THE OWNER'S DIRECTION. 25. OVERNIGHT PARKING OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. 26. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE PARKS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, LATEST EDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ~□
:;~
~~ oz
□
f.l ~ ~
~
0~
m ..
',,
N~
... ,
,!,]"
N~
,
cl
;,,,::;
3§
E:lf
a,o
~~ .. .,
0 -□ ,; ' ~~ g,
it[
ii"
"'
~ 0
~
r
I
§
~ ~
l
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF VERDE DESIGN. INC. AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, AND DE\JELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS. DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED, REPRODUCED, OR PUBLISHED BY ANY METHOD, IN \'MOLE OR IN PART, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM. OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE 'M-1ATSOEVER WITI-IOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF VERDE DESIGN, INC. [>l[>l[>l[>l[>I[>
* RfGts'<':.
.;.',", I ~
,.;,; ~ ~ < "11 z: I?"-~ D e- P V' Cl
"-71 ~1 ,g ;e: ~ ~ n "'z c'i1i ,._, ;i:,;.
'f:=- §~ ~ (C -~ ,-.._""b ~ el
,% .. ' \~"./
4 • 1~3i.
! r- ~ . . - ~ ~l•
a. '° ,0 l!I 5 - - ::I "'ti'
•i::°' ... !!.
x ;;; a >' ! ~ o,.o,.~P. - (n "' 0,. ft ...,t11w~ 8 u,AOi a -
~
"' > ~n~ :;: s § ii;::
z~~ Cl RI ;i;
.. ,. ii! ~~~ ., ~
~ m
;:;;
b
m
0 m
en
-
C)
z

STROLLER PARKING

VAN NO PARKING
VAN
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING VAN NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING NO PARKING
NO

PARKING
VAN BUS PARKING PASSENGER DROP OFF +12 VAN NO PARKING 2V 4A 3A3V 30 60 60 20 20 4444 44 29 60606028 11 13 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP ACCESSIBILITY PLAN KL MB 1"=50'-0" L0.1ACCESSIBILITY PLAN 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' NORTH L0.1 MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L0.2 1. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AS INDICATED ON PLAN IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESS ROUTE WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT LEVEL CHANGES EXCEEDING 12" BEVELED AT 1:2 MAX. SLOPE, OR VERTICAL LEVEL CHANGES EXCEEDING 14" MAX. AND A LEAST 48" WIDE. SURFACE IS SLIP RESISTANT, STABLE, FIRM, AND SMOOTH. CROSS SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 5% UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 2. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROM WALL AND ABOVE 27" AND LESS THAN 80". ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS: THE AMENDED REGULATIONS INDICATE THAT THE SIGNAGE AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE "MINIMUM FINE $250" BELOW THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AS EITHER AN ADDITIONAL SIGN OR ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE. THIS FINE POSTING REQUIREMENT IS IN ADDITION TO OTHER SIGNAGE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. 4. STRIPING REQUIREMENTS: THE REVISED REGULATIONS INDICATE THAT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. THE BORDER (PERIMETER) SHALL BE PAINTED BLUE. THE HATCHING WITHIN THE LOADING AND UNLOADING ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE PAINTED A SUITABLE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PARKING SPACE AT 3'-0" MAXIMUM ON CENTER. BLUE OR WHITE PAINT IS PREFERRED. ACCESSIBILITY PLAN NOTES SYM DESCRIPTION FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS IS 20' AND RATED 96,000 LBS PROJECT LIMIT OF WORK DF NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFER TO DETAIL X, SHEET XX ADA ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL (4 FT. MIN. WIDTH @ S=5% MAX.) VEHICULAR ACCESS (24 FT. MIN. WIDTH - ARROWS INDICATE TRAVEL DIRECTION) ADA ACCESSIBLE POINT OF ENTRY TRUNCATED DOMES, REFER TO DETAIL X, SHEET XX. PARKING INFORMATION ACCESSIBILITY LEGEND NON-ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLS* TOTAL ACCESSIBLE STALLS NORTH LOT 595 7A, 5V 12 12 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 955 *NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLS PER CBC 11B-208.2 SOUTH LOT 360 5A, 4V 8 9 L0.2 • if~ I ~i-=1 ... , I • . ._ __ _ I I I ' ' . 1) ' ' I ' ' I ----------- ,· D L (?
I
' )I
' -
'I
,I
Ii

I I I I I I
•
00 -------

I ------------------ ---------
1 -----
~----- ---
-------- +
-f' - --- "' ---------
l
... . ... , . ..,
-1- 1;1:J-------(S31~VA;;-;;~;Brld)
01:IVArnoe )100llUS3M
a"a"a=a
1b'~,,;1~=======-~=-=-=-==--======~="=-==aa==========b=====ca=====;;;c==f§:~-=~=-""'i"'==.:~ ! 0
DRAWING NAME: Y:\P..-ojects-F0\2021\210JB00 - Ro:inwille 6 Soccei- Complex\CAD\_ACC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 06-24-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46
I
V I
0 i ;7
• •
'
A
I
- - - - - - - - - - -
• q
------------
------------
-----.::.-.:-----------t----------------
·-
----------------------
-
_
"'::
_
-=
_
"':!' - -~~--
Q 0 0
lzsl
L
- - - - - -
---- -----7-----------
0 0
----
---
,----- 1 I
_________ _JL __ _
A
I
• • • A
I

I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - -
I r - ;: ____ - - -- ------- --------------------- ---- ----= - -----------------
------- --
---
-------- --------------
--------:... - ~-;;;-== ~ -:= - - -=----------t--------- - -------- -------------------
-
- --------
--
---------
--
- ---------------;------------------
_...... ,.., .... ....:,: '
------
-
-----0-------------------------------
-
_ _::_~=-- --Q. --- - - -~:--
-
-.--- -- -- - -- -- , .... -..;;;;;-- ------------------- ---------L-- .,,,.
-- --------------- - -- - - - - - ----~ --
• • 0 Iii 0
----7
I
,-------
1 -------7 I
i,.. _____________ _J L __________ ..)
------~L-,-~~,-~-~-~~-~-~~~J~"~,cc··:-:-:-:--:-~-:-:-c-:-:-F-~"~~r~cc~~~~~~~ :c:. i
, .I _____
I
J
.. • 1'
L---------------- ---------------~- ___ i ______________ _ ' I -----·~---~ ----------~-

I I I I I

I I I I I
I I I I • '¥
e • • I
)'II(
•
I iS~~-- ,'•~•-- -•-• I J ••
··
-
···
,.,.,_, __ '
r--
1 I I I I I
I
I
• •
Ill Ill Ill, iii
§§ ,-,---;,",.....,.--,-.,.....,.....,....,.....,.-f,,--,---,,--,--'>' /f,"7-,......,.--,--,,--,!'-,--~--,--~~~ I
~------
..... ------',:-;.-.,-.,,.....,--,---,-...,....,.,.,....,--,-....,....,......,....,;...., 0 11 I
1--¥.1+1: l"J' '--hH+-H--VA-+-+-++-+-+0 +-+--+-+--t
:,
---
--
---
----
•
----
------
----
--------
··················•~::",,1 ............ ;-.. __
•
-------------
------ l --
----
----
----.;:
--- t
i
I
I
>
D
I
I
I
I
I
I ' • I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
• • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
•
• /
•
•
•
F----==--=-
c::)
____________ _J
7 I , I L
___ 3- ___ J
•
-------------~---------------------
•
_.11----
I
L
!
11------+!.

I
I=
!
•~-=~•a '~•7
I I
___ _I __ _J
•
ii
-
---;;;- ;.-
- -- -

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
EXPIRATION DATE:

JULY 2023 "1:(-
f/j -- < or CAll~~

VAN NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING

BUS PARKING
PASSENGER DROP OFF NO PARKING 4V 5A 64 64 64 46 46 15 20 32 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP ACCESSIBILITY PLAN KL MB 1"=50'-0" L0.2ACCESSIBILITY PLAN 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' NORTH MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L0.1 L0.2 1. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AS INDICATED ON PLAN IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESS ROUTE WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT LEVEL CHANGES EXCEEDING 12" BEVELED AT 1:2 MAX. SLOPE, OR VERTICAL LEVEL CHANGES EXCEEDING 14" MAX. AND A LEAST 48" WIDE. SURFACE IS SLIP RESISTANT, STABLE, FIRM, AND SMOOTH. CROSS SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 5% UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 2. ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROM WALL AND ABOVE 27" AND LESS THAN 80". ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS: THE AMENDED REGULATIONS INDICATE THAT THE SIGNAGE AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL INCLUDE "MINIMUM FINE $250" BELOW THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY AS EITHER AN ADDITIONAL SIGN OR ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE. THIS FINE POSTING REQUIREMENT IS IN ADDITION TO OTHER SIGNAGE REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE FOR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. 4. STRIPING REQUIREMENTS: THE REVISED REGULATIONS INDICATE THAT THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE STRIPING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS. THE BORDER (PERIMETER) SHALL BE PAINTED BLUE. THE HATCHING WITHIN THE LOADING AND UNLOADING ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE PAINTED A SUITABLE CONTRASTING COLOR TO THE PARKING SPACE AT 3'-0" MAXIMUM ON CENTER. BLUE OR WHITE PAINT IS PREFERRED. ACCESSIBILITY PLAN NOTES SYM DESCRIPTION FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS - FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS IS 20' AND RATED 96,000 LBS PROJECT LIMIT OF WORK DF NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN, REFER TO DETAIL X, SHEET XX ADA ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL (4 FT. MIN. WIDTH @ S=5% MAX.) VEHICULAR ACCESS (24 FT. MIN. WIDTH - ARROWS INDICATE TRAVEL DIRECTION) ADA ACCESSIBLE POINT OF ENTRY TRUNCATED DOMES, REFER TO DETAIL X, SHEET XX. PARKING INFORMATION ACCESSIBILITY LEGEND NON-ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLS* TOTAL ACCESSIBLE STALLS NORTH LOT 595 7A, 5V 12 12 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 955 *NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE STALLS PER CBC 11B-208.2 SOUTH LOT 360 5A, 4V 8 9 ' L -- . - - -- --- - . --- i
-· -

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com

WETLAND HIGH WATER LINE WETLAND HIGH WATER

LINE SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND HIGH WATER LINE

WETLAND HIGH WATER

LINE SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND

WETLAND HIGH WATER LINE

WETLAND HIGH WATER
LINE SETBACK SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE G - REFER TO SHEET L1.8 MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L1.2

LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN - -----0 ..
g
c'-0
~-
~m
0 f..l~
w
_J _J
LL>
0~
VJ 0
oa:

Zu_ <Co
_J
>--
fu
- --------B&,;ll
r---
en
n r---
co - no
I I
Ul - 00
oNI
r---
oo
--
z ..
z
. o_
u <( 0
0 .
.
•
•
.. / / ,/,
'-.___----
~ --< ;/:- .•
/<,
\ ( _I_
..
i ,'
--~ ' ii/
'/ i
..
, / ' '';
i / ,:
:' / i
:' / i
. . 'i,
...
'/'
...
. .
. .

I
' •
i
)
.
•
:\
-
I I/ <" 2- I • 6'
+/ ,, I') + + I <'· I ~,
----c-:~--
- 1.· -"'-----------------------------
-
-" --------------------------------------,-\
I
/(j
I
f6
I
I I
\!
I
I
I I
I
.
,. ~, +
··--
.10"6L9
• -•· +
= ---=====:::::c::.:::===:__-96 ___ ]l;M .. 9s,9h0N
PREPARED Br IJE OR UNDER
MY SUPER\•'ISION
Ct-lRISTOFHER S. lrilAR-TlN, P.L$. !l1 79-
CMARTIN-ffl<Efi'~IGI-I T.COM
::

I. lHIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SU~\IEY. NO UA
BILIT'i IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & \\lllGHT. FOR
lHE EXISTENCE OF ANY

EASEMENTS, ENCUMB

RANCES, DISCREPANCIES IN BOUNDAR
Y, OR
TIJLE

DEFIECTS NOT MEN TIONED IN SAID DOC
UMENTS AND lHEREFORE NOT
SHO'M-1 ON
lHIS
DR MllNG.

2. ALL

DISTANCES AND
ELEV
ATIONS
SHOI\N HEREON
ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS lHEREOF.

3. lHE TYIPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DE
PlHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTillTIES AS
SHOWN
ON lHIS TO
POGllAPHIC
SURVEY WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR \1NG
REUABl!JTY. THE CON TRAC
TOR IS CAUTIO~ED THAT ONLY ACllJAL EXCAVATION 111LL
REI/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,
SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPlHS OF

SUCH UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES. (A
REASONABL£ EFFORT HAS BEEN ~ADE
TO WC

ATE AND DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERG
ROUND
UllUllES). HD\IIEVER. lHE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME ND

RESFONSIBI
UTY FOR 11,E COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY or ITS
DEUNEAllON OF SIJCH
UNDERGROUND UllLITIES 111HICH
MAY
BE ENCOUNTERED. BUT WH ICH ARE NOT
SHO'M-1I ON
-¢ lHESE
DRAWINGS.

4. lH E
SUB.t:CT
PROP8RTY IS SHOWN
ON lHE FE

DERAL EME
RGENCY MANAGrnENT AGENCY
(f[ MA) FLOOD INSURANCE

RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR
PLACrn COUNTY, CIIUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 06061C0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NU~BER 06024J (CITY OF ROSEVILLE), \\111, AN
EFFECll\lE DAlE Of NOVEM
BER 2, 2018, AS
BEING
LOCAlED IN f LOOD ZONE ' x'(NO
SCREEN).

AC

CORDING TO FE
M1A lHE
DEFlNITION OF ZONE 'X'(NO SCREEN) IS:

AR
EAS

DETERMINED
TO BE OUITSIDE lHE 0.2%
ANNU
AL
CHANCE FLOODPLAN.

FEMA BASE FLOOO ELEVATIONS
A
RE BASED ON NA\/ll88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK:

CITY
BM 129
o-1/4" BRASS DIS~
S
TAMPED• 2016
PLS 6276, LOCATE
D· ON lHE

NORJHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF lHE CON/SPAN
ON lHE EAST SIDE DI" WESTBROOK BLVD. BEING APPROX. 2001 FEET NORJH OF lHE IN TERSECllON WITH f l£ASANT BL'IO .

ELEVATION = 96.120 (NA\/ll88)

6. BASIS OF
BEA
RINGS:
lHE BEARING OF
NORll,
05' 12' 11 • WEST TAKBN ON THE
MON
UMENT LINE OF l'IE
STBROC
BO
ULEVARD AS S~OI\N ON lHAT CERT

AIN SUB
DIVI
SION
MAP, NUMBER 000176 FI LED FOR
RECO
RD ON
AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL RECORDS 0
PLACER

COUN TY WAS

TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR

ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HER
EON .

7. CORNER
RECORD NOTE:
lHE DE'IBLOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SH
Ail
BE

RESPONSI
BLE rDR ifHE
PRE

PARATION
AND

FILING OF

PRE- CONSTRUC TION AND
POST- CONSTRUCmON CORNER RECORDS fOR
ANY

MONUMENTS OR
PROPERT'i CORNERS SHOWN HEREON lHAT MAY BE DESTROYED

DURING IMP

ROVEMEN TS TO THE
SUB£CT PROPERTY AS DffllNED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
lHE PROfESSIONAL l AND SUR\'EYORS ACl

8. lHIS MAP HAS

BEBNI PRODU CED ACCOR

DING TO PROCEDUR
ES THAT CIJl,IPLY \'lllH
NAllONAL
S
TANDARD f OR SP ATIAL ACCURACY {NSSOA) FOR A CO

NTOUR INTERVAL
OF
1-FOOT
AND A MAP SCALE OF I "=40'. CO
NTOURS 1111HIN \oEGETATED AREAS AND
SHAD
OW OIJllUNEO AR
EA MAY
NOT
MEET
MAPPING STAND~
ROS ANO 910ULD
BE FlELD
CHEC
KED. THIS COMP
UTER
PL

OTTED MAP WAS CE

NERATEO BY

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC

METHODS BY
KIER+IIRIGH l JOB NUMBER
A21651. OAlE
OF PHOTOGl<APHY
AUGUST 2,
2021,
·- CT
V-----
,-100 ------
.,,--- r or ________
- E·- -----
x X )(
- F
O-----
- rs--
- -- - G-:-eGM
- JT-----
------0--
-0H-----
------
+- 100..00
- SD----0----[g
- SD----o---©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- ClV-----
C,_~
- W----..1---
W =====
---fl\'lp--~, .. ,--
= RW====· ~TS-----
• Ii]
!XI
• 12"
Tf:
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION

CONCRETE CURB
CONc~m CURB & GUffiR

MAJOO CONTO
UR UN[

MIIIOR CON

TCMJR IUNE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MEiNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
AllE SERI/IC£ LINE & VAlVE.

GAS LINE-VAL\IE & ME1ER
JOINT "TRENCH LINE
Lorr LitrlE
MONl'JMENli/iMON

UMENT LINE
O\IERHEAD POWER UNE
PROPERTY L!r-!E
SANITARY S!JiER· UN
E"'IIAlliOI.E & CW.NOOT
SAN lifARY SE\litll UNE O\IER 24"[)1fl-lMETER
SIDEWA
LK
SPOT 8l£VA TION
STO!lM DRAIN rn£-I.IANHOL£ &
CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lNl::-l,IAN
HOU: & CATCH BASIi
STCMlM OllAIN LINE
D~R
24-"DIIAt.lEIDl
STllEET IL!
Gt!T CQND-IJI T LINE
TELEPH
ONE Ui'IE
GABL.£ TEJL.£VISION LI
NE
'ffiEE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of
B.ANK
WAT~R
U

NE & VALVE
WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IAUETffi
REOLAlf.lED 1/iAilER ILil'lE & VAf..Vf.

REOLAIUEO WAiER IU
NE OVER 2<1:"0IA
UETER
TRftlrflC
SIGNAl
Ai~ODE
/I/REA ORAIN
BOllARD [Ui'll.ESS

O'IHERWI SE NOTED-)
ELECiliROUER

ARE DEPARTMENT CONN
ECTION
FIRE H\'DRANIT
PO'i\E'R POLE/JOINIT POLE
TIVl/l'ISfOOMER
ffiA!FFIC
SIGN

WATBR VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX UTILITY UNE MARKER
AD i'I
REA ORAi NI IR/W RI GHT OF WAY
BLRO
Bet.LARO IR\\S

RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW
BACK

OF WALK IRE RIM ELEVATION
C
CctlCRETE IR\\B REC

YCLED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\MH RE

CYCLED WATER MANHOLE
CLf

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV

RECYCLED WATER VAL VE
CMP
CORRUGAlED
METAL
PIPE
SD
STORl,I

DR PII N
co CLEA

NOUT SOMH
STORM OR.'IIN MANHOLE
DI
DRAIN INLIT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJEGlRI C BOX SSMH SANIT AR t SEWER MANHClE
EP ffiGE OF

PAVEMENT
$LB STREET
U

GH T BOX
EW ffi
GE
OF

WALK TELEP
HONE
EV EL£ClRI C VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\UNE TOE
TOE OF
BANK
G8 GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BANK

GLM GAS LIN E

MARKER TMH TELEP

HONE MANHOLE
L/S LAND SCA.PE TYP. TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllUTY BOX
p PAVEl,IEN T VG VALLEY
GU ffiR
! pp
POWER
PClE \ICP \'lTRIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP}
PER PLAN 1\13 WATER [>OX
PVC
PC!. WIN'il
CHLO
RIDE I\M WATER METER
RCP REINFORCED CONCREliE
PIPE WI< WATER
RISER {,n,,
--------

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---:I
CJ
10:::
c::
w
.
:~
No.
9179
09- 24- 2021
DATE
(lJ
,:: 0 -
.c
.,,.

SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE H - REFER TO SHEET L1.8 MATCHLINE I - REFER TO SHEET L1.9 MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L1.1
MATCHLINE B - REFER TO SHEET L1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L , "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ ~, ,.o ~;,' Cc " r. C' zc, -, f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' '". ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 C , '·:J Cl:'· -a:'.-' LL c_l ,- - _g \ \ \ / I ' \ __ --~ --1 I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' \\ \t \, ' . I ----+--\ I I I I I I I Cl ------- I I
- ' I / \
- Iii I - - - - - - ~"""' ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;.. \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • '~ ~\ ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _/ _ / ,_ - - - - - - - - - .. - - - 11 / \ VI / I / \ .'
\ / \
,
' / \/
I
I
I
I
I
I
* I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I'-
'" I
I /
PREPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\IISI
ON
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM
/
!
/
I
I
!
I
/
I
=

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO
UABIL\TY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTE

NCE OF AN Y
EAS
8 ~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR
8PANCIES IN BOU

NDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND THcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
THIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN HEREON ARE \~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,
LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTIHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTil\TIES AS SHOWN

ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR YING
RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTR AC
TOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111Ll
RP/EAL THE TYPES. EXTENT.

SIZES,

LOCATIONS
AND DE

PTHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLE EFFORT
HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iE'IE

R, TIHE
E
NGINE

ER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS

DELINEATION OF SUCH
UN
OERGROIJND UITIL\ITI

ES WHICH MAY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ TH
ESE
ORAI\INGS.
4, llHE SUB.E
CT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON THE f1EDERAL EMERGE

NCY MANAGEM
E

NT AGENCY
(FE~A)

FLOOD INSUR
N

NCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR
PL.ACER COOHTY, CAUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~M
UNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LLE), WITH AN
EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO
FEMA THE DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE
8 N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED

TO BE OU
T, IDE llHE 0.2% AN
NUAL

CHANCE FLOODPLAI
N.

FE~A BASE FlOOO
ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
7 6, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON THE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FEET

NORTH OF THE IN TERSECTION WI TH

PLEASANT GROVE
BL',!l,
EL
EVAITION = 96.120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON TIIE ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BO
ULEVI.

RD AS SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILED FOR
RECO
RD ON
AUGUST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0
Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR All BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON.

7. CORNER RECO

RD NO TE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR
ACTOR SHALl BE RESPONSI
B

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTIR UCTION AND POST- CONSTR

UCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR

PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO THE
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF

ESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1"1llH

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR SP
ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF
1-FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS WITH IN \'.EGET
ATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HAD01'1 O\JllLNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MA
P

PING STA
NDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHECKEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or

PHOTOGRAPHY
AUCUST 2,
202 1.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
- FO-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT------
----0--
-0H-----
+- 100.00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T------
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W =====
--R\'lea-~--,.,ooa--
= RW
~rs-----
AO
BLRO
BW
4>
o
•
0-
-,0,.
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

AR
EA
DRAIN\
BCUARO

BACK OF WALIK

CONCRETE CATCH
BASIN
CA
BLE TEL£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IU
NE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
MDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.l
E

NT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
Eccil!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)\At.lETER
SIDEWALK SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IANHOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!

STREET ILI
G~T CQN[,IJIT LI
NE
TELEPH
Or.lE IUI-IE
GABL£ 1iEJL£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"
0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAII-.I
ED WAi1ER !LI
NE & '/Af_Vf_
RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
S\GNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS
OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER
Fl

RE OEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE
H'l'DRANIT
POM:R POLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE
UTILITY BOX UTILITY LINE MARKEil
Rl l)HT OF WA Y RECYCLED WATER BOX
RIM El.E\IATION
C
CB
CLF
Ct.IP
co
DI

CHAIN LINK FE
NCE
CORRUGi'.lED METAL PIPE Cl.EANOUT
IR/W IR\\S IRE IR\\B
IR\\IIIH
IRWV
SD
SDMH
ssco
SSMH
~LB
REC
YCLED

WATER BOX
REC

YCLED WATER MA
NHOLE

RECYCLED WATER VALVE
STORM
DR ,Ill N
STORlol
D
RNIN l.4ANHOLE
SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
SANITARt SEWER MANHClE STREET

UGH T BOX

TELEPHONE
EB
EP
EW
EV
FG FL
GB
GLM
L/S
MON
p
pp
(IP)
PVC
RCP
DRAIN IN!.ET
EIJEClRIC BOX

EDGE OF PAVEM
ENT
EDGE

OF WALK
El!ECTRIC VAULT

FACE OF CURB
FLOI\\JNE

GRADE BR
EAK

GAS LINE
MARKER

LANDSCAPE
MONUM
ENT
PA\IEt.lENT
POWER
PQE

PER PLAN
POL Y\'IN)l
CHLO
RIDE

REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE
re
TB
TOE
TOP
TMH
TYP. IUB
VG
\'GP
l'4l
1/rM
I\R
TOP Of CURB TELE

PHONE BOX
TOE Of
BANK
TOP OF
BAN K

TELEPHONE MANHOLE

TYPICAL
UlllLIT'/ BOX
VALlEY
GUffiR
VI

TRIFIED CLAY PIPE
WATER [>OX WATER MEITR
WATER
RISER

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
- '
-.i:cs ._ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ..

DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46
SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE J - REFER TO SHEET L1.10 MATCHLINE B - REFER TO SHEET L1.2
MATCHLINE C - REFER TO SHEET L1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L . "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. e';o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co ,-:; -[_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs " ,, ~, ,.o ~;,' u Cc r. C' zc, ,, f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' '". ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 C • '·:J Cl: -- ,,:, __ , LL c_l ,- - _g PREPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl UNDEF-1 MY SUPER\IISION D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179 CMARTINtil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM '-:'.>\ ,Y ,:;.;c'· Jl~-· .,

1. TillS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR TilE EXISTENCE OF ANY EAS8~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID DOCUMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT SHO'M'I ON !HIS DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTIHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS SHOWN ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABIUTY. TIHE CONTR ACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPlHS OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLIE EFFORT HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'ER, TIHE ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR TIHE COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUN TERED, BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON -¢ lHESE ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE f1EDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FE~A) FLOOD INSURNNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 060243 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LLIE), WITH AN £FFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018, AS BEING LOCATED IH FLOOD ZONE 'X"(NO SCREEN).

ACCORDING TO FEMA lHE DEFlNrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM .

5. BENCHMARK: CITY BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 8276, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD. BEING APPROX. 2001 FEET NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH PLIEASANT GROVE BL',!l. ELEVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ t.lONUI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC BOULEVI.RD AS SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUBDMSION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILIED FOR RECORD ON AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BOOK CC OF MAPS AT PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0 Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.

7. CORNER RECORD NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SHAUL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION ANO FILIN G OF PRE-OONSTIR UCTION AND POST- CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR ANY MONUMENTS OR PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MI.Y BE DESTROYED DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE SUB.ECT PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF TilE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PRODUCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1'11TH NATIONAL STANDARD FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF 1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CONTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGETATIEO AREA$ ANO $HAD01'1 O\JllLJNED AREA MAY NOT MEET MAPPING STANDARDS ANO SHOULD BE FlELO CHECKEO. TIHIS COMPUTER PLOTTED ~AP WAS GENERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEiTHODS BY KIER+i<RIGlff. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DA TE OF PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2, 2021.
- CTV-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
- E·-----
- FO-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT------
----0--
-0H-----
+- 100.00
- SD---0-1111
- SD------o--©
= SDI====·
-SL-----
- T------
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W =====
---R\'lea-~-..... - -
= Rw====· ~rs-----
4>
o
•
-6-
.,o,.
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON TOUR IUNE
EDGE Of PAWMBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
MDNLJMEN!/iMONUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANITARY SEIER UNE"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)1At.lETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IANHOLE & CA Till BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPHOr.lE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY
TOP OF BANK TOE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAIMED WAi1ER ILINE & '/Af_Vf. RECLAIMED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER TRA!fl'IC SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [UNLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'l'DRANIT
POM:R POLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AREA DRAINI IR/W Rl l)HT OF WA Y
BLRO BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C CONCRETE IR\\B RECYCI..ED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCLED WATER MANHOLE
CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGr'.lED METAL PIPE SD STORM DR ,Ill N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol DRNIN l.4ANHDLE
DI DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT ~LB STREET UGH T BOX

EW EDGE OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB
FG FACE OF CURB TB TELEPHONE BOX FL Fl0111LJNE TOE TOE Of BANK

GB GRADE BREAK TOP TOP OF BAN K
GLM GAS LINE i,jARKER TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEt.lENT VG VAULEY GUffiR
! pp POWER PClE \'CP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE (IP) PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX PVC POL Y\IIN'fl CHLORIDE l/rM WATER METER RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE PIPE I\R WATER RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
No. 9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
= 0
u
0 ln
ro
N
0 e
:1....
"' ,,. ::ii
-
, -.i:cs--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE K - REFER TO SHEET L1.11 MATCHLINE C - REFER TO SHEET L3.3
MATCHLINE D - REFER TO SHEET L1.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L , -L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' Cc e';o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L< :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co C ,-:; [_ F'= Cc'. ' ,, u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r c:c LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs -·" ~, ,.o
~;,'
LJ Cc
r. C'
zc,
-,
f:::'
LL :a; ,u 5~
c2 "' ,,_ ,,-<
.,
'" '.'.:~
(.C "" E: i3
LJ '
'·:J
Cl:•.
-a:'.-'
LL c_l
,- -
_g
I \ I I \ I I I I ' I
I I \ I 1--~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------r-- --...._____ I \ •~ -- --
-

1. ,.•c.
,--i ,•
Oc"' ..;:~
V' '"'
u .

I c,C,
:,:·,
~='
l
,I,
·'" " r
,-,, ,-- ·,·,,,--,--,,
"·' ,L 0
94 ,,
u
0 " u
u
' " '
\
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
'
---,_----
---9 .. fl---
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I
' ' '
<· ,-;:, -/!, ,;')
PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\II
SION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM
'
T
I
-- -- -1-- -- -

I I I I I I
,, I

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF
ANY
EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMB
RANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.
2, ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN
HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~A
LS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,

LOCATIO

NS, SIZES AND/OR DE

PTIHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS
SHOWN

ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOUR
CES OF

VARYING
RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTR AC
TOR IS
CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111Ll
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,
SIZES,

LOCATIONS
AND DEPlHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLE EFFORT
HAS
BEEN
~ADE

TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'E

R, TIHE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATI

ON OF SUCH

UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH
MAY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ lHESE
ORAI\INGS.
4, llHE
SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EME
RGE

NCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
(FE~A) FLOOD INSUR
N
NCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER

COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF
ROSE"1LLE), WITH AN
EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£M
BER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO FEMA lHE
DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED
TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2%
ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE
~A BASE FlOOO ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM .
5, BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
76, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FE
ET
NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH
PLEASA

NT GROVE
BL',!l.

EL
EVAITION = 96J20 (NAVD88)
6,
BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON TIIE ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BOULEVI.

RD AS

SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILED FOR

RECORD ON AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RDS 0
PLACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS lHE BAS1S FOR All BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON,
7, CORNER
RECORD
NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR
ACTOR SHALl BE

RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTIR UCTION ANO POST- CONSTR

UCTION CO

RNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR

PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROf
ESS10NAL
LAND SURVEYORS ACT.
8, THIS MAP HAS
BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1"1llH

NATIONAL

STANDARD
FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL
OF
1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SC
ALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGET
ATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HA0
O1'1 O\JllLNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STANDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHEC
KEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY
PHOTOGRAMI.IETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGlff. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DA TE or PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2,
2021.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
-
E·-----
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
-----0--
-0H-----
+- 100.00
- SD---0--1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W ===== ----R
W- ~~,,., __
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CA
BLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IU
NE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER Oli''lilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G,AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT '!REN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
E"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)1At.lETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IAN
HOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPl-!
Or.lE IUl'IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK T
OE Of IBAl'IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAI
MED WAi1ER ILI
NE & VAf_l/f_
RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED,)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'tDRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
"IRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA
DRAIN/ IR/W Rl l)HT OF WA Y
BLRO
BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE Rllol El.E\IATION
C
CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED

WATER BOX

CB CATCH
BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCLED WATER MA
NHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV

RECYCLED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGi'.lED METAL

PIPE SD
STORM
DR ,Ill N
co Cl.EA
NOU T SDMH STORlol
D
R.'IIN l.4ANHDLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE

EP EDGE OF

PAVEMENT
~LIB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT re TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE
P

HONE BOX
FL FLOI\\.INE TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BAN K
GLM GAS LIN E i,jARKER TMH TELEP
HONE I.IANHOLE
L/S LANDSCAPE TYP. TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEt.lENT VG VALlEY
GUffiR
! pp POWER
PClE \'CP lllir

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP)
PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\'IN'fl
CHL
ORIDE 1/rM WATER METER

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
- " -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE D - REFER TO SHEET L1.4
MATCHLINE F - REFER TO SHEET L1.6 MATCHLINE L - REFER TO SHEET L1.12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L . 7L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L • 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' Cc e';o LL c;,v rt "z ' ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>- C 7 L' :'i~ (C - z .. ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co 0 ,-:; [_ F'=c:: ' ., u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r c:c LL " LC .. L ,,, ,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs -
,,
~, ,.o ~;,'
u Le
, . rz c,
.,
f:::'
LL:.,;
oU 5~
c2 "' '". ,,-<
.,
'' '.'.:~
(C "" E: i3
L •
'·:J
Cl:•-
•O:'.-'
LL c_l .- -
_g
\ I 't ; .. I I ·. . I . ! \\\\ · ~ (/ ! ' .
•---~----------------~----------------------------------------- ' <c, ,_

I I I I
I
I
- _/
'. "" \
\~
'
.;5'
"°(,'
I
• !
/
r-
.L
[
r
I
I
I
I
'
' r
' I
I
(£' •C
Cl
w
\0
-..j
I
I
I
I
:., I
C? I
t_:; I
I :
' r: ' I : ' I :
' I
I
~-ss-1--J
' -Ai.,,; J
-JI I
I I
. I
I
' L
',- 1,dl;,;~;,: .,
·- '-'~CJ -=-~
. (}
I \·',;
I ' •
-
..,-- "' ,o if'
c_;, -D
"'
\
GJ
-::0 --1/(J~, -,!G-'-'
--~,~
\
\
.A-IS-
\\
'\_
\,
\\
'\_
\._\
\';·:
_y:·•~
I
I
I
' I
I
I
lL_I /'cc-:·
\1"--s
C
. Io,
0/U ,__; u v-i I'- ,
I
I l
t-~
I £
- .I
----- - -rd d-
/
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ·,
' ' ' ' ' \
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' \
' ' ' ' ' \
' ' ' ' ' ' \
' ' '
··.'\
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
/ '
I /;-.

I c:.,
-.._~ C"" ',,,
PREPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\IISION
a-lRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMA
RTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM
L-6
,·-·--.1
I "' "·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
11 'I
I I

I, I I I I I I -

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUND~RY SUR\!:Y, NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED,
BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTE

NCE OF ANY
EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMB
RANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOU

NDARY, OR
TIile DEfcCTS NOT McNITIONcD IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND THcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
TillS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL

DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN
HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~A
LS THEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,

LOCATIO

NS, SIZES AND/OR DE
PTHS OF EXJSITING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS
SHOWN
ON TillS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OOT~INED FROM SOURCES OF VAR YING
RELIABIUTY. THE CO
NTR AC

TOR IS CAUTI
ONED THAT ONLY ACTIJAL EXCAVATION 111Ll
REVEAL TilE TYPES. EXTENT,
SIZES.

LOCATIONS
AND DE

PTHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABUE EFFORT
HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'E
R. lliE
ENGINE

ER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR THE COMPUETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS

DELINEATION OF SUCH
UN
OERGROIJND UITIL\ITIES WHICH
~AY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
'¢ Til
ESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. TI,E SUB.E
CT PROPERTI IS S~O\'IN ON THE fIEDERAL EME
RGE
NCY MANAGE~

ENT AGENCY
(FE~A)

FLOOD INSUR

NNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR
PL.ACER COONTY, CALIFORNIA. MAP
NUMBER 0606i C0920H FOR CO~M
UNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LUE), WITH AN
EFFEC ] 11/E DATE OF NOi/EM
BER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IN
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO
FEMA THE DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE
8 N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED

TO BE OU
T, IDE ITiiE 0.2% AN
NUAL
CHANCE FlOODPLAI
H.
fE
~A BASE FlOOO
ELEVAITIONS ARE BASED ON NA'ill88 DATUM .

5. BENCHMARK: CIT/
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
7 6, LOCATED ON THE NORTilEAST ANGLE
POINT DF lliE CON/SP~N ON TilE EAST SIDE DF \11:STBROO< BL'ill.

BEING APPROX, 2001
FEET
NORITii OF THE IN TERSECTION WI TH
PUE
ASA

NT GROVE
BL',!l,
EL
EVAITION = 96. 120 (NA'ill88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ MON UMENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BO
ULEVI.

RD AS
SHOWN ON TilAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
M~P, NUMBER 000176 FIUED FOR
RE

CORD ON
AUGUST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RDS 0
Pl.ACER COUNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR All BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON.

7. CORNER RECO
RD
NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR
ACTOR SHALl BE

RESPONSI

BLE FOR THE

PREPARATI
ON
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTRUCTION ANO POST- CONSTR

UCTION CO

RNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR
PROPERTI CORNERS SHOWN HEREON TilAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO THc
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF

ESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. TillS MAP HAS BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES TilAT COOPLY 1'11TH

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR SP
ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL
or 1- FOOT ANO A ijilJp SC
ALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS WITH IN \'.EGET

ATED AREAS ANO
$HAD
01'1 OUTUNEO AR
EA MAY NOT I.I EET MA

PPING STA
NDAR

OS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CH
ECKED. THIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+l'<RIGHT, JOB NUMBER A21'1',5t DATE or

PHOTOGRAPHY
AUGUST 2,
2021.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
---0--
-0H-----
+- 100.00
- SD---0---1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL.-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1---..1---
W ===== ---R
W- -~,., __
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CA
BLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IU
NE
ED
GE Cf
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE- VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
MDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUM

ENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
E"'l!i\lllOI.E & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)\At.l
ETER
SIDEWALK SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IAN
HOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfil,I DRAIN LI~E DI/ER 24"DIAMETEI!

STREET IU
G~T CQN[,IJIT LI
NE
TELEPH
Or.lE IUl'IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£VISION LINE
"ll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of IBAl'IK
WAT
8R UNE & VALVE

WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"
0IIIUETffi
REO.LAII-.I
ED WAilER ILI
NE & V/111/f.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE Ol!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
S\GNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS
OlHERWISE NOTED,)
ELECliROUER
Fl

RE DEPARTMENT CON

NECTION
FlRE
H'l'DRANIT
POM:R POLE/JO/NIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'll!A!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE
UTILITY BOX UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA DRAIN\ IR/W Rl l)HT OF WA Y
BLRO
BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ ELEVAITION
C CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED

WATER BOX

CB CATCH
BASIN IR\\IIIH REC

YCLED WATER MA
NHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV

RECYCLED WATER VALVE
CMP COORUGi'.lED METAL

PIPE SD
STORM
DR ,Ill N
co CI..EA
NOU T SDMH STOR!ol
DRNIN "4ANHDLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITARt SEWER MANHClE

EP EDGE OF
PAVEM
ENT
~LIB
STREET

UGH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT
re

TOP OF CU
RB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\\JNE
TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BAN K

GLM GAS LIN E

MARKER TMH

TELEPHONE MANHOLE
L/S LANDSCAPE TYP. TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLITY BOX
p PA\IEt.lENT VG VALlEY
GUffiR
!
pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP) PER PLAN 1'43 WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\IIN)l
CHLO
RIDE l/rM WATER MEITR

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No,
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
- ' -.,:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE M - REFER TO SHEET L1.13 MATCHLINE E - REFER TO SHEET L1.5
MATCHLINE F - REFER TO SHEET L1.7 MATCHLINE N - REFER TO SHEET L1.14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.6 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L , "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> 'u r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' Cc e';o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L< :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co ,-:; -[_ F'= [:'. '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "u "" L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs " ·" ~, ,.o ~;,' LJ Cc r. C' zc, ., f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' ,,_ ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 LJ ' '·:J Cl: -- ,,:, __ , LL c_l ,- - _g I

I I I I I
---T----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'----------------------------------------------~--- 1

I I I I I I I I I
'',, .... ,, ...... ,~_
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
ii
11 • I
I
..
-·(
I
/ I
I I I I 6-
.1 -;-6: - -
-------.::::,
",,",",
----
'"·
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
'
-----
-------..___ ___ -
----- -
,-,. f, J -,\\ct-{
1 LJ
,.
:,:s ¾ti
.I
,',::-2
,·o~
·,., ,,,.
----/'
s'~:_0') ''<"
<~, 0\··---~~
I
I
I
I
rT
.l
'
w
ca
j
u
"' C:

PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\II
SION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF
ANY
EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMB
RANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL

DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
S
HOWN
HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~A
LS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,

LOCATIO

NS, SIZES AND/OR DE

PTIHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS
S
HOWN

ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOUR
CES OF

VARYING
RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTR AC
TOR IS
CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,
SIZES,

LOCATIONS
AND DEPlHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLIE EFFORT
HAS
BEEN
~ADE

TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'liE\IE

R, TIHE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATI

ON OF SUCH

UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH
MAY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ lHESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE
SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EME
RGE

NCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
(FE~A) FLOOD INSUR
N
NCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER

COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF
ROSE"1LLIE), WITH AN
EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£M
BER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO FEMA lHE
DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED
TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2%
ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE
~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM .
5, BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
76, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FE
ET
NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH

PLIEASA

NT GROVE
BL',!l.

EL
EVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BOULEVI.

RD AS

SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILrD FOR

RECORD ON AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RDS 0

PLACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON.
7, CORNER
RECORD
NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR

ACTOR SHAUL BE

RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTIR UCTION ANO POST- CONSTR

UCTION CO

RNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR

PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF

ESSIONAL
LAND SUR\'l:YORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS
BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1'11TH

NATIONAL

STANDARD
FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL
OF
1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SC
ALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGET
ATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HA0
01'1 O\JllLNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STANDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHEC
KEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2,
2 021.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror ...____.-
-
E·-----
- FO-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
----0--
-0H-----
---
---
+-1 00..00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1----..1---
W ===== --R
w- -~, .. ,--
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CA
BLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IU
NE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
E"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24°DIAMETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IAN
HOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPl-!
Or.lE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAI
MED WAi1ER !LI
NE & '/Af_Vf.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'tDRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA
DRAIN/ IR/W Rl l)HT OF WA Y
BLRO
BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C
CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED

WATER BOX

CB CATCH
BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MA
NHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV
RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGi'.lED METAL

PIPE SD
STORM

DR ,II/ N
co CI..EA
NOU T SDMH STOR/.1
D
RNIN l.4ANHDLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE

EP EDGE OF
PA\IEMENT
~LB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE
P

HONE BOX
FL FLOI\\JNE TOE
TOE OF
BANK

GB GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BAN K
GLM GAS LIN E /.IARKER TMH TELEP

HONE MANHOLE
L/S LANDSCAPE TYP. TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLITY BOX
p PA\IEt.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
! pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP)
PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\IIN'fl
CHL
ORIDE 'lrM WATER METER

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
- ' -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE O - REFER TO SHEET L1.14 MATCHLINE F - REFER TO SHEET L1.6
LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.7 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L , "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. e';o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co ,-:; -[_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs " ,, ~, ,.o ~;,' u Cc r. C' zc, ,, f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' '". ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 C , '·:J Cl: -- ,,:, __ , LL c_l ,- - _g I
I
I
I
I I I
,--~------------
J---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 I
' ' ' ' ' ' I
' ' I ', '
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
\
\\
\
\
\ ',\\
'~
/
/
,//
////_/,
_/_,,.,,,.,/
///_.,/
-
--------
I
I
.-1--"
I
I
I I
I
I ~------ ~--- -- ---~~1-
g\
3 I
-~-~7
I
I
.L
-" .-·
.96".
µ
I ,O:\
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
' '
PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\IISION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTINtil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM
' ' ' ' '
' ' ' \
I
I
' ' I
I
' ' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' '
/
I

1. TillS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF ANY
EAS
8 ~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID DOC
UMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL

DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
S
HOWN HEREON ARE \~ FEE1i AND OECl~A
LS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,
LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTIHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTil\TIES AS S
HOWN ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR YING RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTRAC
TOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,

SIZES, LOCATIONS
AND DE
PlHS OF
SUCH

UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLE EFFORT
HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'E

R, TIHE

ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH

UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH MAY BE

ENCOUNTE
RED, BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ lHESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EMERGE

NCY MANAGE
ME

NT AGENCY
(FE~A)
FLOOD INSURNNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER COOHTY, CAUFORNIA, MAP NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 060243 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LLE), WITH AN EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018, AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLOOD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCORDING
TO FEMA lHE DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED

TO BE OU
T, IDE llHE 0.2% AN
NUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.
5, BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3- 1/4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 8276, LOCATED ON lHE
NORlHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FEET
NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH
PLEAS

ANT GROVE
BL',!l.

ELEVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BOULEVI.RD AS
SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUBDMSION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILED FOR RECO
RD ON AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BO

OK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0

PLACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.
7, CORNER RECO

RD NO TE
TilE DEi/E

LOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SHAUL BE RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF

PRE-OONSTIRUCTION ANO POST- CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR ANY MONUMEN TS OR PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MI.Y BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE
SUB.ECT PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF

ESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1'11TH

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR
SPATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF
1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGETATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HA0O1'1 O\JllLNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STA
NDAR

DS ANO SHOULD

BE FIELD
CHECKEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE
NERATED SY PHOTOGRAMI.IETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or

PHOTOGRAPHY
AUCUST 2,
202 1.
- CTV-----
,.--100-----
--ror ....____.-
-
E·-----
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----e GM
- JT-----
----0-- - 0H-----
+-1 00..00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL----- - T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1----..1---
W=====
---R\'1- -~· .. ·--
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IUNE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI
TARY SEIER UNE"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24°DIAMETER
SIDEWALK SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IAN
HOLE & CA Till BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE

TELEPHONE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK T
OE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAIMED WAi1ER ILI
NE & VAf..Vf.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE Ol!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE
A/REA. DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE llEPARTMENT CONNEC:110~
FlRE H'tDRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!NSFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA DRAIN\ IR/W RI IJHT OF WA Y
BLRO BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MANHOLE
CLF
CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP CORRUGi'.lED METAL

PIPE SD
STORM DR ,Ill N
co CI..EA
NOUT SDMH STOR!ol
D
RNIN \.4ANHOLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITARt SEWER MANHClE
EP EDGE OF PA\IEMENT ~LB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\UNE TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BREAK TOP

TOP OF BANK

GLM GAS LIN E MARKER TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
!
pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP) PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\IIN'fl
CHLO
RIDE 1/r!,1 WATER MEITR

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2'1- 2021
DATE
-
, -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK

WETLAND SETBACK
WETLAND SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE G - REFER TO SHEET L1.1 MATCHLINE H - REFER TO SHEET L1.2 MATCHLINE P - REFER TO SHEET L1.9 LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK

LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.8 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN I I M.Lt:e~ON ,--- 1 -- I I\ -'i
- I I
-,. \
,._
~-
. I //
'~
,
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
i1
I
--
\,,.
-------
• /
.;::-:
1---------------~-~---_-----------
'\, y I
/.< /
- --
I
I
i
I
I
I
-
:;: b
::::r:: ;i- f-- N
0 5'
I
ti
i I
\ I I --t I I
/· cl tl-i t
!'6'1"lilf
'j II l
I l
I i
I i
I i I l I I
I
I I
I I
~, It. :is !'6~~T
I 11
II
I
PREPARED Br IJE OR UNDER
MY SUPER\•'ISION
Ct-lRISTOFHER S. lrilAR-TlN, P.L$. !l1 79-
CMARTIN-ffl<Efi'~IGI-I T.COM
(
'
'
I. lHIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SU~\IEY. NO UA
BILIT'i IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & \\lllGHT, FOR
lHE EXISTENCE OF ANY EASE

MENTS, ENCUMB

RANCES, DISCREPANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIJLE

DEFIECTS NOT MEN TIONED IN SAID DOC
UMENTS AND lHEREFORE NOT
SHO'M-1 ON
lHIS DR MllNG.

2. ALL DIS

TANCES AND

ELEVATIONS
SHOI\N HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMA
LS lHEREOf.

3. lHE TYIPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPlHS Of
EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTillTIES AS
SHOWN
ON lHIS TOPOGllAPHIC
SURVEY WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR \1NG
REUABllJTY. THE CON TRACTOR IS CAUTIO~ED lH'AT ONLY ACllJAL EXCAVATION 111LL REI/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES,
LOCATIONS AND DEPlHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES. (A REASONABL£ EFFORT HAS BEEN ~ADE

TO WCATE AND DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UllUllES). HD\IIEVER. THE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME ND

RESFONSIBI
UTY FOR 11,E COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY or ITS DEUNEAllON OF SIJCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 111HICH
MAY
BE ENCOUNTERED. BUT WH ICH ARE NOT
SHO'M-1I ON
-¢ THESE
DRAWINGS.

4. 11,E SUB.t:CT PROP
8RT)' IS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGrnENT AGENCY (f[ MA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR
PLACrn COUNTY, Clu.lFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 06061C0920H FOR CO~MUNIT'i NU~BER 06024J (CITY OF ROSEVILLE), \\111, AN EFFECll\lE DAlE Of NO'il:M
BER 2, 2018, AS
BEING
LOCAlED IN
F
LOOD ZONE ' x'(NO
SCREEN)_

ACCORDING TO FE
M1A THE DEFlNITION OF ZONE 'X'(NO SCREEN) IS:

AREAS DETIERMINED
TO BE OUITSIDE 11,E 0.2% ANNU

AL CHANCE FLOODPLAN,
FEMA BASE FLOOO ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NA\/ll88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK:

CITY BM 129
o- 1/4" BRASS DIS~ STAMPED• 2016
PLS 6276, LOCATE
D· ON 11,E

NORTHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF 11,E CON/SPAN
ON THE EAST SIDE DI" WESTBROOK BLVD. BEING APPROX, 2001 FEET NORll, OF THE IN TERSECllON WITH fl£ASANT BL'IO.

ELEVATION = 96.120 (NA\/ll88)

6. BASIS OF BEARINGS:
lHE BEARING OF NORll, 05' 12' 11' WEST TA~BN ON THE MONUMENT LINE OF l'IE STBROC
BOULEVARD AS S~OI\N ON lHAT CERTAIN SUBDIVISION MA
P, NUMBER 000176 FILrD FOR

RECORD ON
AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN BO

OK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFI
CIAL RECORDS 0
PLACER

COUN TY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR

ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HER
EON .

7. CORNER
RECORD NOTE:
lHE DE'IBLOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SH
Ail
BE

RESPONSIB
LE FOR ifHE PRE

PARATION

AND FI LIN G OF
PRE- CONSTRUC TION AND POST-CONSTRUCmON CORNER RECORDS FOR ANY MONUMENTS OR PROPERT'i CORNERS SHOWN HEREON TH AT MAY BE DESTROYED

DURING IMP

ROVEMENTS TO THE
SUB£CT PROPERTY AS DffllNED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
THE PROfESSIONAL l AND SURVEYORS ACl

8. THIS MAP HAS BEB

NI PRODUCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COMPLY WITH

NATIONAL
S

TANDARD
FOR SPATIAL ACCURACY {NSSDA) FOR A CON
TOUR INTERVAL or
1-FOOT
AND A MAP SCALE OF I "=40'. CO
NTOURS 111THIN VEGETATED AREAS AND
SHADOW OIJllUN[O AR

EA MAY NOT
MEET
MAPPING STAND~ROS ANO 910ULD
BE FlELD
CHEC
KED. THIS COMP
UTER
PL

OTTED MAP WAS CE

NERATEO BY

PHOTOGRAMMETIRIC
MEll,QDS BY
KIER+IIRIGHT. JOB NUMBER A216

51. OATIE OF PHOTOGl<APHY
AUGUST 2,
2021,
-- CT
V-----
,-I 00 --------
.,--- r or ___________
- E-- -----
x X )(
- FO-----
- rs--
- -- - G-:-eGM
- JT-----
-------0-- - 0H-----
------
+- 100..00
- SD------0----[g
- SD------Q--©
= SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- ClV-----
C,_~
-w--__,.,___
W=====
-----fl\'lp--~ .. 1---
=RW====·
~ TS-----
• Ii]
!XI
• 12"
Tf:
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION

CONCRETE CURB
CONc~m CURB & GUffiR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[

MIIIOR CON

TCMJR IUNE
EDGE Of PAWMEiNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER Oli''lilCS LINE
AllE SERI/IC£ LINE & VAlVE.

GAS LINE~VAL\IE & ME'!ER
JOINT "TRENCH LINE
Lorr LitilE
MONlUMENli/iMONUM

ENT LINE
O\IERHEAD POWER UNE
PROPERTY L!NE
SANITARY S!JiER· UNE"'IIAlliOI.E & CW.NOOT
SAN lil'ARY SE\litll UNE O\IER 24"[)1fl-lMETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT 8l£VA TION
STO!lM DRAIN rn£-I.IANHOL£ & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lNl::-l,IAN
HOU: & CATCH Bli.SII
STCMlM OllAIN LINE D~R 24-"DIIAt.lEIDl
STllEET IL!Gt!T CQND-IJI T LI
NE
TELEP
HONE Ui'IE
GABL.£ TEJL.£VISION LI
NE
"ffiEE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of
B.ANK
WAT~R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0
IAUETffi
RECLAIMED 1/iAilER ILil'lE & '/Af_Vf. REOLAIUEO WAiER IU NE OVER 2<1:"0IAMETEfl
TRftlrflC
SIGNAl
Ai~ODE
/I/REA ORAIN
BOllARD [Ui'lLESS

O'IHERWI SE NOTED-)
ELECiliROUER

ARE DEPARTMENT CON
N
ECTION
FIRE H\'DRANIT

POM'R POLE/JOINIT POLE
TIVI/NSfOOMER
TRA!FFIC
SIGN

WATBR VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX UTILITY UNE MARKER
AD i'I
REA ORAi NI IR/W RIGHT OF WAY
BLRO
Bet.LARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX

BW BACK OF WALK IRE RIM ELEVATION
C CctlCRETE IR\\B REC

YCLED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\MH REC

YCLED WATER MANHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV REC
Y

CLED WATER VAL VE
CMP
CORRUGAlED METAL

PIPE SD
STORl,I DR PII N
co Cl.EA

NOUT SDMH
STORM ORl'IIN MANHOLE
DI
DRAIN INLIT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJEGTRI C BOX SSMH SANIT AR t SEWER MANHClE
EP ffiGE OF
PAVEM
ENT
$LB STREET UGH T BOX
EW ffiGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV EL£CTRI C VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\UNE
TOE

TOE OF BA
NK
G8 GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP Of BANK

GLM GAS LIN E MARKER TMH

TELEPHONE MANHOLE
L/S LAND SCA.PE TYP. TYPICAL M
ON MONUMENT IUB UlllUTY BOX
p PAVEMENT VG VALlEY GU ffiR
! pp POWER
PClE \ICP \'lTRIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP}
PER PLAN 1\13 WATER [>OX
PVC
Pct WIN'il
CHLORIDE I\M WATER METER
RCP REINFORCED CONCREliE
PIPE WI< WATER
RISER {,n, ,
--------

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---:I
CJ
10:::
c::
w
.
:~
No.
9179
09- 24- 2021
DATE
(lJ
,:: 0 -
.c
.,,.

SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE I - REFER TO SHEET L1.2 MATCHLINE Q - REFER TO SHEET L1.10
MATCHLINE P - REFER TO SHEET L1.8 LIMIT OF WORK EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.9 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L . "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. ~o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co ,-:; -[_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs " ,, ~, ,.o ~;,' u Cc r. C' zc, ,, f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' '". ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 C • '·:J Cl: -- ,,:, __ , LL c_l ,- - _g <{'.7--, ,\ '-, ,·,,, . ' ' ' ' I I I I ' I I I I I I I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' I ' I ' I ' I I ' I I ' I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I PR EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\II
SION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF
ANY
EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMB
RANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN
HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,

LOCATIO

NS, SIZES AND/OR DE

PTIHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTil\TIES AS
SHOWN

ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOUR
CES OF

VARYING
RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTR AC
TOR IS
CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,
SIZES,

LOCATIONS
AND DEPlHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLIE EFFORT
HAS
BEEN
~ADE

TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'E

R, TIHE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATI

ON OF SUCH
UNOERGROIJND UITIL\ITIES WHICH
MAY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ lHESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE
SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EME
RGE

NCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
(FE~A) FLOOD INSUR
N
NCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER

COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF
ROSE"1LLIE), WITH AN
£FFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£M
BER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO FEMA lHE
DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED
TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2%
ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE
~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM .

5. BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
76, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FE
ET
NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH

PLIEASA

NT GROVE
BL',!l.

EL
EVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC
BOULEVI.

RD AS

SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILIED FOR

RECORD ON AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0
Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON.

7. CORNER
RECORD
NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR

ACTOR SHAUL BE

RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTIR UCTION AND POST- CONSTR

UCTION CO

RNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR
PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MI.Y BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF

ESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS
BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1"1llH

NATIONAL

STANDARD
FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL
OF
1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SC
ALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGET
ATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HAD
01'1 O\JllLJNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STANDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHEC
KEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2,
2021.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
-
E·-----
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
----0--
-0H-----
---
·
---
+- 100.00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W ===== --R
w- -~, .. ,--
= Rw====· ~TS-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CA
BLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IU
NE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
E"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)1At.lETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IAN
HOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"D\At.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPH
Or.lE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAI
MED WAi1ER ILI
NE & '/Af_Vf.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER IU
NE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'tDRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JO\NIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA
DRAIN\ IR/W RI IJHT OF WA Y
BLRO
BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C
CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED

WATER BOX

CB CATCH
BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCLED WATER MA
NHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV
RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGi'.lED METAL PIPE SD
STORM
DR ,Ill N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol
D
RNIN \.4ANHOLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE

EP EDGE OF

PAVEMENT
~LB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE
P

HONE BOX
FL Fl0111LJNE TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BAN K
GLM GAS LINE i,jARKER TMH TELEP

HONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
! pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP)
PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\IIN'fl
CHL
ORIDE 1/rM WATER METER

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2'1- 2021
DATE
-
, -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE J - REFER TO SHEET L1.3 MATCHLINE Q- REFER TO SHEET L1.9
MATCHLINE R - REFER TO SHEET L1.11 LIMIT OF WORK EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L . "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 • CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. ~o LC Cr" rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co C ,-:; [_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u (;....J rs -
,,
~, ,.o ~;,'
u Cc
r. C'
zc, ,,
f:::'
LL :a; ,u 5~
c2 "' '". ,,-<
.,
'" '.'.:~
(.C "" E: i3
C •
'·:J
Cl:'· -a:'.-'
LL c_l
,. -
_g
...... : · .............. .. ,. ... • ·················"i~c'R ........ [•;;·- .... - -,!5 - ........... v'!:. :,.,,/· /" / .. v"'."s•, ········'}···· ·············~········· ........... ~~·:·~,>~~f:s, ························· ···········11_;<;!_ ..f 0 ·t:",, .......... ~:~: ....... C l ..

I .. .,,/./ I - _,,.,- ../ // Pc I CJ: / / , L I
____ / _,,, n / /'i. I
- - - --- : --- - --- - --- - --... '-' - - --- - -- /L//' - - - --- - --- - - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- ... - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - - - - - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - - --- - --- - --- - ~. e - - - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - --- - -~,:!~- -~-~-~i-j- -
---
-
---
-
---
-
---
-
---
-
---
- :
- ".~) ~I\//, .. 01:5:~ t-Sf,,'~11 l!IAS:: ~I.I rn11,;:r/ ,.,,, · ""'' ,.,. I \\
\.
\\
\\
\
//
///
(
'\\\ y.
,_ '1;•
'\ "'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I ' ' ' I '
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
' ' ' ' ' ! '
;
' ' ' ' ' ' '
//
PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\IISION
a-JRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTINtil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM
·•.• lee

I ' I I I I I I I I I

1. TillS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED,
BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF ANY
EAS
8 ~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID DOC
UMENTS AND TilcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
TillS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS THEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,
LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS

SHOWN ON THIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR YING
REUABIUTY. THE CO
NTRAC
TOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL TilE TYPES, EXTENT,

SIZES, LOCATIONS
AND DE
PTilS OF
SUCH

UNOERGROIJND
UTI
UTIE,. (A REASONABLE EFFORT
HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTI
UllES). HO'/iEl'E
R, lliE

ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO
RESPONS1BIUTY
FOR THE CO!.IPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH

UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH MAY BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ TilESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. TIHE SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O\'IN ON !HE fIEDERAL EMERGE

NCY MANAGEM
E

NT AGENCY
(FE~A)
FLOOD INSURNNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER COOHTY, CAUFORNIA. MAP NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 060243 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LLE), WITH AN EFFECll11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018, AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLOOD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCORDING
TO FEMA lti[ DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED

TO BE OU
T, IDE TIHE 0.2% AN
NUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3- 1/4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 8276, LOCATED ON lti[ NORTil[AST ANGLE POINT OF TIHE CON/SP~N ON TilE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FEET
NORTIH OF THE IN TERSECllON l'IITH
PLEASA

NT GROVE
BL',O.

ELEVAITION = 96.120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON lllE ldON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC

BOULEVA
RD AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN SUBDMSION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILED FOR RECO
RD ON AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BO

OK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RDS 0
Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS lHE BAS1S FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.

7. CORNER RECO

RD NO TE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SHAUL BE RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILING OF

PRE-OONSTIRUCTION AND POST-CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMEN TS OR

PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO THE
SUB.ECT PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF
ESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES !HAT COOPLY 1'11IB

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF 1-FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS WITH IN \'.EGET

ATIEO AREAS ANO
$HA001'1 OIJTILNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STA
NDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHECKED. THIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB HUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or

PHOTOGRAPHY
AUCUST 2,
202 1.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror ....____.-
-
E·-----
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----e GM
- JT-----
---0-- - 0H-----
+-1 00.00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
=
SDI====·
-SL----- - T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1---...1---
W===== --Rw- -~, .. ,--
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR /LI
NE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER Oli''lilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!NE
SANI
TARY SEIER UNE"'l!i\lllOI.E & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)\At.lETER
SIDEWALK SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IANHOLE & CA Till BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPl-!
Or.lE IUNE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK T
OE Of \BANK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOL.Alr-.lED WAi1ER ILI
NE & VAf..Vf.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER /LI
NE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
S\GNAl
Ji/NOOE A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED,)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'l'DRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE TRA!NSFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR

EA DRAIN/ IR/W RI IJHT OF WA Y
BLRO BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MANHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCLED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUG:'.lED METAL PIPE SD

STORM DR ,II/ N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol
D
RNIN \.4ANHOLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITARt SEWER MANHClE
EP EDGE OF PA\IEMENT ~LB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\\JNE TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BREAK TOP

TOP OF BANK

GLM GAS LINE MARKER TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllUT'/ BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
!
pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP) PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\'IN'fl
CHLO
RIDE 'lrM WATER METER

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2'1- 2021
DATE
-
, -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE R - REFER TO SHEET L1.10 MATCHLINE K - REFER TO SHEET L1.4 LIMIT OF WORK MATCHLINE S - REFER TO SHEET L1.12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.11 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L , -L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> LC r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. ~o LL c;,v rt "z ,. ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co 7 ,-:; [_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs -
,,
~, ,.o ~;,'
u Cc
r. C'
zc, ,,
f:::'
LL :a; ,u 5~
c2 "' '". ,,-<
.,
,,
'.'.:~
(.C "" E: i3
L ,
'·:J
Cl:'· -a:'.-'
LL c_l
,- -
_g
I I
-•-----
• I
I
,-c~

I I I I I I I I I
___
I
__._
I
--------------- ~:::., -------
w, n
LL '"'./ 2:, 0 ,9 V <.\:;, I
,;;, /\" $, C)
---- ---- ---- --- - --- - --- - - -- "':,~ --- - --- - ,;-;•.- - ---- ---- c; ,-. - ---- ---- ---- - --- - --- - -- ,r----
-<
w
CY
--
t5 '' (_)
'~
TW
L7 ::::_ c,, -, ~: ,,-)
.a;:'=-
,• ' )
('•,j
' I
/
!
' ' /
' ' '
L0
--
•----
• ---------
__ ,:Jc----
I
I
I
----------.------
6 ca I
,_--; cc; I ,':c"' .

L I
0 '
'
I '
PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\II
SION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179
CMARTI
Ntil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM

I I I I I I I I

1. TillS IS NOT A
BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO

UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF
ANY
EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMB
RANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOC
UMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN
HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS THEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,

LOCATIO

NS, SIZES AND/OR DE

PTHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS
SHOWN

ON THIS TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOUR
CES OF

VARYING
RELIABIUTY. THE CO
NTR AC
TOR IS
CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,
SIZES,

LOCATIONS
AND DEPlHS OF

SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLE EFFORT
HAS
BEEN
~ADE

TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'E
R, THE
E

NGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR THE COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATI

ON OF SUCH

UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH
MAY
BE

ENCOUN TERED,
BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON
-¢ lHESE
ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE
SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EME
RGE

NCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
(FE~A) FLOOD INSUR
N
NCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER

COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP
NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 0602
43 (CI TY OF
ROSE"1LLE), WITH AN
EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£M
BER 2, 2018,

AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLO
OD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCOR
DING
TO FEMA lHE
DEFl
NrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED
TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2%
ANNUAL
CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE
~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM .
5, BENCHMARK: CITY
BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 82
76, LOCATED ON lH[ NORlHEAST ANGLE
POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD.

BEING APPROX. 2001
FE
ET
NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH
PLEASA

NT GROVE
BL',!l.

EL
EVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEARINGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON TIIE t.lON UI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC

BOULEVA
RD AS

SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN SUB
DMSION
MAP,. NUMBER 000176 FILrD FOR

RECORD ON AUG
UST 16, 2013, IN

BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RDS 0
Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BAS1S FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HER EON.
7, CORNER
RECORD
NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTR

ACTOR SHAUL BE

RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE
PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILIN G OF
PRE-OO

NSTIR UCTION ANO POST- CONSTR

UCTION CO

RNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMENTS OR

PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE

DESTROYED
DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE
SUB.ECT
PROPERTY AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROf
ESS10NAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS
BEEN
PROD
UCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1"1llH

NATIONAL

STANDARD
FOR SP ATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL
OF
1-FOOT AND A ijilJp SC
ALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOURS W,lH IN \'.EGET
ATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HA0
01'1 O\JllLNED AR

EA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STANDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE FlELO
CHEC
KED. THIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY
PHOTOGRAMI.IETRIC
MEiTHODS
BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB HUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2,
2021.
- CT
V-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
- F
O-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
----0--
-0H-----
---
---
+- 100.00
- SD----0-1111 - SD-------o---©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W ===== ----R
W- -~,,., __
= Rw====· ~TS-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CA
BLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CON

TOUR IUNE
ED
GE Of
PAW
MBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!
LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMO
NUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!r-!E
SANI

TARY SEIER UN
E"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)1At.lETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::-l,IANHOLE & CA Till
BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPl-!
Or.lE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK T
OE Of IBAI-IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER
24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAI
MED WAi1ER ILI
NE & '/Af_Vf.

RECLAI
MED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'tDRANIT
POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR
EA
DRAINI IR/W Rl l)HT OF WA Y
BLRO
BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C
CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED

WATER BOX

CB CATCH
BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MA
NHOLE
CLF

CHAIN LINK FE

NCE IRWV
RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGr'.lED METAL PIPE SD
STORM
DR ,Ill N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol
D
RNIN l.4ANHOLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE

EP EDGE OF
PA\IEMENT
~LIB
STREET
U

GH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE
P

HONE BOX
FL FLOI\UNE TOE
TOE Of
BANK

GB GRADE BR

EAK TOP
TOP OF
BAN K
GLM GAS LINE i,jARKER TMH TELEP

HONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLITY BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
! pp POWER
PClE \'CP VI
T

RIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP)
PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC
POL Y\IIN'fl
CHL
ORIDE l/rM WATER METER

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R
WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
-
, -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE L - REFER TO SHEET L1.5 MATCHLINE S- REFER TO SHEET L1.11
MATCHLINE T - REFER TO SHEET L1.13 LIMIT OF WORK L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN --,,---------------------~-------------f9-Aol-He----~i----------,,M,,-,,,::.----- 1 ,,;;,,,)·1 r 6 . ro, ... 'ffl' ---------- .,;;;.;. -- -- . "b -- ,,,, -- -- -- -
- --
~o
--

60. -- -- -- -- --~0 .Jl,. -- --
"'<9 . .i<aL'. <9· <'o ~. 0./~ ola ,9 Po, ,, • ll , 0/ 2- , , • ,11 J_ - , ll • , , II " " IE II , - II > ~---- - -- ------- - - --
--
-
__ ,
I I
I -- -
I ~r i : I
I
/· "', '
' 7 ; 25.0' TEMPORARY 11ERHEAD ELECTRICAL ESMT ! (2015 0066688 O.R.) ' ' ' '
' ' p ' ' '
' ' ' '
6· <, ' /· = "'6 '
6·
1 •--r---------------------------------------------------------- 1 r' ---
~
<6.
~------
~----------------------
,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I '

I I I I I I
PREPARED Br IJE OR UNDER MY SUPER\•'ISION
Ct-lRISTOFHER S. lrilAR-TlN, P.L$. !l1 79-
CMARTIN-ffl<Efi'~IGI-I T.COM
I. lHIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SU~\IEY, NO UABILIT'i IS ASSUMED, BY KIER & \\lllGHT, FOR

THE EXISTENCE OF ANY

EASEMENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCREPANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
lllLE DEFIECTS NOT MEN TIONED IN SAID DOCUMENTS AND THEREFORE ~OT SHO'l,l,I ON
THIS DR MIING.

2. ALL

DISTANCES AND
ELEV
ATIONS
SHOI\N HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMA
LS lHEREOf_
3, lHE TYIPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF
EXISTING UNDERGROUND UllllllES AS
SHOl'IN ON THIS TO
POGllAPHIC SURVEY WERE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES Of VAR \1NG RELIABllJTY. THE CONTRAC
TOR IS CAUTIO~ED lH'AT OOLY ACllJAL EXCAVATION 111LL
REI/EAL THE T'iPES, EXTENT,
SIZES,

LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES. (A
REASONABL£ EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE
TO WCAlE AND DELINEAlE ALL

KNOWN UNDERGROUND
UllLillES). HD\IIEYER. lHE

ENGINEER CAN ASSUME ND
RESPO
NSIBILITY FOR lHE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY or ITS DEUNEAllON OF SIJCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES \\HIGH
MAY

BE ENCOU
NlERED, BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SH0'/,1,1I ON
-¢ THESE
DRAWINGS.

4. lHE SUB.t:CT PROP8RT)' IS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGrnENT AGENCY (F
EMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PLACrn COUNTY, Clu.lFORNIA, MAP NUMBER D6061C0920H FOR CO~MUNIT'i NU~BER 06024J (CITY OF ROSEVILLE), \\1lH AN
EFFEClll/E DATE or NOVEMBER 2, 2018, AS BEING
LOCAlED IN
FLOOD ZONE 'x'(NO
SCREEN).

ACCORDING TO FE
M1A lHE DEFl
NITION OF ZONE "X'(NO SCREEN) IS:

AREAS DElERMINED TO BE OUITSIDE lHE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN, FEMA BASE FLOOO ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK:

CITY
BM 129
3-1/4" BRASS
DIS~ STAMPED• 2016 PLS 6276, LOCATED· ON lHE

NORTHEAST ANGLE
POINT Of lHE CON/SPAN
ON lHE EAST SIDE O, WESTBROOK BLVD. BEING APPROX, 2001
FEET NORJH OF lHE IN TERSECllON Willi fl£ASANT GllO\'E BL'IO. ELEVATION = 96,120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS Of BEARINGS:
lHE BEARING OF NORTIH 05' 12' 11' WEST TAKBN ON THE MONUMENT LI NE OF l'IESTBROC BOULEVARD AS S~OI\N 00 lHAT CERTAIN SUBDIVISION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILrD FOR

RECORD ON
AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL RECORDS 0
PLACER COUNTY WAS TAKEN AS lHE BASIS FOR ALL BEARINGS SHOWN HER
EON .

7. CORNER RECORD NOlE:
lHE DE'IBLOPER ANO/OR COOlRACTOR SHALL BE

RESPONSIB
LE rDR ifHE PRE

PARATION

ANO FI LING OF PR
E- CONSTRUC TION AND POST- CONSlRUCmON CORNER RECORDS FOR ANY MONUMEN TS OR PROPERT'i CORNERS SHOWN HEREON lHAT MAY BE DESlROYED

DURING IMP
ROVEMENTS TO lHE SU8£CT PROPERTY AS DffllNED IN SECTION 8771(8) or lHE PROfESSION/u. l AND SURVEYORS ACl

8. lHIS MAP HAS BEB

NI PRODU CED ACCOR

DING TO PROCEDUR
ES THAT Cl.IMPLY \'lllH

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR SPATIAL ACCURACY {NSSOA) FOR A CO

NTOUR INTERVAL
or
I-FOOT AND A MAP SCALE OF I "=40'. CONTOURS 111THIN \oEGETATED AREAS AND SHADOW OUllUN[O AR

EA MAY NOT
MEET
MAPPING STAND~ROS ANO 910ULD
BE FlELD
CHECKED. THIS COMP
UTER

PLOTTED MAP WAS CENERATEO BY

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC

METHODS BY
KIER+IIRIGH T. JOB NUMBER A21651. DATE OF PHOTOGl<APHY
AUGUST 2,
2021,
·- CTV-----
,-I 00 ---------
.,--- r or -------------
- E·- -----
x X )(
- FO-----
-rs--
- -- - G-:-eGM
- JT-----
-------0-- - 0H-----
------
+- 100..00
- SD----0------[g
- SD----Q-----©
=
SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
-ClV-----
C,_~
-W---..1---
W =====
------fl\'lp--~, .. ,--
= RW====· ~rs-----
• Ii]
!XI
• 12"
Tf:
..

CABLE TEL£\IISION

CONCRETE CURB
CONc~m CURB & GUffiR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[

MIIIOR CONTCMJR IUNE
EDGE Of PAWMEiNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER Oli''lilCS LINE
AllE SERI/IC£ LINE & VAlVE.

GAS LINE-VA
L\IE & ME1ER
JOINT "TRENCH LINE
Lorr LitrlE
MONl'JMENli/iMONUMENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER UNE
PROPERTY L!r-!E
SANITARY S!JiER· UN
E"'IIAlliOLE & CW.NOOT
SAN li!"ARY SE\litll UNE O\IER 24"[)1fl-lMETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT 8l£VA TION
STO!lM DRAIN rn£-I.IANHOL£ & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lNl::-l,IAN
HOU: & CATCH Bli.SII
STCMlM OllAIN LINE D~R 24-"DIIAt.lEIDl
STllEET IL!Gt!T CQND-IJI T LINE
TELEPHONE Ui'IE
GABL£ TEJL£VISION LINE
'ffiEE/BRUSH CANOPY

TOP OF BANK
TOE Of
B.ANK
WAT~R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IAUETffi
REOLAlf.lED 1/iAilER ILil'lE & '/Af_Vf_
REOLAIMEO WAiER IUNE OVER 2<1:"0IAMETER
TRftlrflC
SIGNAl
Ai~ODE
/I/REA ORAIN
BOllARD [Ui'lLESS O'IHERWI SE NOTED,)
ELECiliROUER

ARE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FIRE H\'DRANIT

POM'R POLE/JOINIT POLE
TIVl/l'ISfOOMER
TRA!FFIC
SIGN

WATBR VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX UTILITY UNE MARKER
AD i'IREA ORAi NI IR/W

RIGHT OF WAY
BLRO
Bet.LARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX

BW BACK OF WALK IRE

RIM ELEVATION
C
CctlCRETE IR\\B RECYCLED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\MH RECYCLED WATER MANHOLE
CLf

CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCLED WATER VAL VE
CMP
CORRUGAlED METAL

PIPE SD
STORl,I DR PII N
co Cl.EA

NOUT SO
MH
STORM OR.'IIN MANHOLE
DI DRAIN INLIT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CLEANOO T EB EIJEGTRI C BOX SSMH SANIT AR t SEWER t.lANHClE EP ffiGE OF PAVEMENT $LB STREET

UGH T BOX
EW ffiGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV Ell£CTRI C VAULT re TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\UNE TOE

TOE OF BA
NK
G8 GRADE BREAK TOP TOP OF BANK
GLM GAS LINE I.IARKER TMH TELEP
HONE I.IANHOLE
L/S LAND SCA.PE TYP. TYPICAL

MON MONUM
ENT IUB UlllUTY BOX
p PAVEi.jENT VG VALLEY GU ffiR ! pp POWER PClE \ICP \'lTRIFIED CLAY PIPE (IP}
PER PLAN 1\13 WATER [>OX
PVC
Pct WIN'il
CHLO
RIDE I\M WATER METER
RCP REINFORCED CONCREliE
PIPE WI< WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415,6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---:I
CJ
10:::
c::
w
'
:~
No,
9179
09-24- 2021
DATE
(lJ
,:: 0 -
.c
.,,_
SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE M - REFER TO SHEET L1.6 MATCHLINE T - REFER TO SHEET L1.12
MATCHLINE U - REFER TO SHEET L1.14 LIMIT OF WORK EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.13 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L . "L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. ~o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L" :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co ,-:; -[_ F'=c:: '" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs 7 ,c, ~, ,.o ~;,' u Cc r. C' zc, -, f:::' LL :a; ,u 5~ c2 "' '". ,,-< ., '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 C • '·:J Cl: -- ,,:, __ , LL c_l ,- - _g I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ••---••••T•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-'-•••• I I I I I I I I PREPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl UNDEF-1 MY SUPER\IISION D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P.L 'S. 9179 CMARTINtil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM

1. TillS IS NOT A BOUN DARY SUR\!:Y. NO UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR TilE EXISTENCE OF ANY EAS8~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID DOCUMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT SHO'M'I ON !HIS DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~ALS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTIHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS SHOWN ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RELIABIUTY. TIHE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPlHS OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLIE EFFORT HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'ER, TIHE ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR TIH E COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON -¢ lHESE ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE fIEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FE~A) FLOOD INSURNNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER COOH TY, CAUFORNIA, MAP NUMBER 0606i C0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 060243 (CITY OF ROSE"1LLIE), WITH AN £FFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018, AS BEING LOCATED IH FLOOD ZONE 'X"(NO SCREEN).

ACCORDING TO FEMA lHE DEFlNrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.

5. BENCHMARK: CITY BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 8276, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD. BEING APPROX. 2001 FEET NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH PLIEASANT GROVE BL',!l.

ELEVAITION = 96.120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
rnE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON 111[ ldONUI.IENT LINE OF l'IESTBROC BOULEVI.RD AS SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUBDMSION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILIED FOR RECORD ON AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BOOK CC OF MAPS AT PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0 Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.

7. CORNER RECORD NOTE
TilE DEi/ELOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SHAUL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION ANO FILI NG OF PRE- OONSTIRUCTION AND POST- CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR ANY MONUMENTS OR PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MI.Y BE DESTROYED DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE SU B.ECT PROPERTY AS DEFIN ED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF TilE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PRODUCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1'11TH NATIONAL STANDARD FOR SPATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF 1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CONTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGETATIEO AREA$ ANO $HAD01'1 O\JllLJNED AREA MAY NOT MEET MAPPING STANDARDS ANO SHOULD BE FlELO CHECKEO. TIHIS COMPUTER PLOTTED ~AP WAS GENERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEiTHODS BY KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2, 2021.
- CTV-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
- E·-----
- FO-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
----0--
-0H-----
+- 100.00
- SD---0-1111
- SD------o--©
= SDI====·
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
C,_~
-1/1--_..,1---
W =====
--fl\'lp----,.,01---
= Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
Ml llOR CONTOUR IUNE
EDGE Of PAWMBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER 01?1ilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!LVE.

G.AS LINE-VAL\'E & ME1ER
JotNT lREN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMONUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!f'!E
SANITARY SEIER UNE"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24°DIAMETER

SIDEWALK
SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::- l,IANHOLE & CA Till BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPHOr.lE IUI-IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY
TOP OF BANK TOE Of IBANK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAIMED WAi1ER ILINE & '/Af_Vf. RECLAIMED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER TRA!fl'IC SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [UNLESS OlHERWISE NOTED)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'l'DRANIT
POM:R POLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR EA DRAINI IR/W Rll)HT OF WA Y
BLRO BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C CONCRETE IR\\B RECYCI..ED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MANHOLE

CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCLED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGi'.lED METAL PIPE SD STORM DR ,Ill N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol DRNIN l.4ANHOLE
DI DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITAR t SEWER MANHClE EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT ~LB STREET UGH T BOX

EW EDGE OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT re TOP OF CURB
FG FACE OF CURB TB TELEPHONE BOX FL Fl0111LJNE TOE TOE Of BANK

GB GRADE BREAK TOP TOP OF BANK
GLM GAS LINE i,jARKER TMH TELEPHONE I.IANHOLE
L/S LANDSCAPE TYP. TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY GUffiR
! pp POWER PClE \'CP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE (IP) PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX PVC POL Y\IIN'fl CHLORIDE l/rM WATER MEITR RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE PIPE I\R WATER RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No. 9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
- ' -.i:cs------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS NOTES EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND EXISTING CONDITIONS ABBREVIATIONS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE O - REFER TO SHEET L1.7 MATCHLINE U - REFER TO SHEET L1.13
LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK MATCHLINE N - REFER TO SHEET L1.6 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 1"=20'-0" L1.14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN L1.1 L1.2 L1.3 L1.4 L1.5 L1.8 L1.9 L1.11 L1.12 L1.13 L1.14 L1.6 L1.7 L1.10 LL(i C ., L - -L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 ' CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ Sc ~, 0 '" LU C CJ '" ?"ri "' [:'. ~o LC c;,v rt "z " ~6 "u " LL rl "c C z7 .-"" i,S, §~ cs:>-- C7 L' :'i~ (C - z" ','~ -<( ,c, lt'.::J co C ,-:; [_ F'=c:: "" ' u: ci' c:H ' zU ' LO ,r cc LL "" CC L n-,,· ocbj Co C1 I <u C _J rs -
,,
~, ,.o ~;,'
u Cc
r. C'
zc, ,,
f:::'
LL:.,;
,u 5~
c2 "' '". ,,-<
.,
"" '.'.:~
(.C "" E: i3
C - '·:J
Cl: --
,,:, __ ,
LL c_l
,, -
_g
--
\
\,
\
\-..._
-------- -.:."€~---.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
---~--:::.-:_"':,.---::-::_:--_:::-=---=----=~-= - - - - ' I I
------------------------------------------i~--"8.,~~~:; r~~~-.~:

I
---------
1 ------
1 I I
L
·--~---------------------------------------------~------------ I ~, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 1 I I I I II I
! 1111 I
PR
EPAREO E,Y ,JE (fl
UNDEF-1 MY
S
UPER\IISION
D-IRISTOFHEF. S. t.!ARTlN, P. L'S. 9179
CMARTINtil(IEfflfEIGH T.COM

1. TillS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SUR\!:Y. NO UABILITY IS ASSUMED, BY
KIER & !,RIGHT, FOR
TilE EXISTENCE OF ANY EAS8
~ENTS, ENCUMBRANCES, DISCR8PANCIES IN BOUNDARY, OR
TIile DEFECTS NOT McNITIONcll IN SAID
DOCUMENTS AND lHcRffORc NOT

SHO'M'I ON
!HIS
DRAl'IING.

2. ALL DISTANCES ANO ELEVATIONS
SHOWN HEREON ARE I~ FEE1i AND OECl~A
LS TIHEREOF.

3. TilE
TYPES,
LOCATIONS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTIHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROIJND UTillTIES AS SHOWN ON TIHIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY Vli:RE OBTAINED FROM SOURCES OF VAR YING RELIABIUTY. TIHE CO
NTRAC
TOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLr ACTUAL EXCAVATION 111UL
RP/EAL lHE TYPES, EXTENT,

SIZES, LOCATIONS
AND DEPlHS OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND
UTILITIE,. (A REASONABLIE EFFORT
HAS BEEN ~ADE TO LOCATE ANO DELINEATE ALL
KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES). HO'/iEl'ER, TIHE

ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO

RESPONSIBILITY

FOR TIHE COMPLIETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCH UNOERGROIJND UITILIITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED, BUT WH ICH ARE NOT SHOl'III ON -¢ lHESE ORAI\INGS.

4. llHE SUB.ECT PROPERTI IS S~O'/IN ON lHE f1EDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGE

MENT AGENCY
(FE~A) FLOOD INSURNNCE RATE MAP (FIRM) FOR PL.ACER COOHTY, CAUFORNIA, MAP NUMBER 0606iC0920H FOR CO~MUNITY NUMBER 060243 (CI TY OF ROSE"1LLIE), WITH AN EFFEC ] 11/£ DATE OF NOl/£MBER 2, 2018, AS BEING

LOCATED IH
FLOOD ZONE 'X"(NO
SCREEN).

ACCORDING
TO FEMA lHE DEFlNrnON OF ZONE 'x'(NO SCRE8
N) IS:

AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUT,IDE llHE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN.

FE~A BASE FlOOO ELIEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM.
5_ BENCHMARK: CITY BM 129
3-1 /4" BRASS
DISK STAMPED 2018 PLS 8276, LOCATED ON lHE NORlHEAST ANGLE POINT OF llHE CON/SP~N ON lHE EAST SIDE OF \11:STBROO< BLVD. BEING APPROX. 2001 FEET NORlH OF lHE IN TERSECTION l\llH
PLIEASANT GROVE BL',!l.

ELEVAITION = 96. 120 (NAVD88)

6. BASIS OF BEi.RiNGS:
lHE BEARING OF NORTH 05' 12' u · WEST TAKEN ON lllE t.lON UI.IENT LIN E OF l'IESTBROC
BOULEVI.RD AS
SHOWN ON TIHAT CERTAIN SUBDMSION MAP, NUMBER 000176 FILIED FOR RECO
RD ON AUGUST 16, 2013, IN BOOK CC OF MAPS AT
PAGE 53, OFFICIAL ll£00RD5 0
Pl.ACER COIJNTY WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS FOR AUL BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON.
7_ CORNER RECORD NO TE
TilE DEi/E

LOPER ANO/OR CONTRACTOR SHAUL BE RESPONSIB

LE FOR THE PRE

PARATION
ANO

FILING OF

PRE-OONSTIRUCTION ANO POST-CONSTRUCTION CORNER RECORDS FOR

ANY MONUMEN TS OR PROPERTY CORNERS SHOWN HEREON THAT MAY BE DESTROYED DURING l!.IPRO\IEMENTS TO lHE SU
B.ECT PROPERTY AS DEFIN ED IN SECTION 8771(8) OF
TilE PROF
ESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.

8. THIS MAP HAS BEEN
PRODUCED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURES THAT COOPLY 1"1llH

NATIONAL STANDARD
FOR SPATIAL ACCU~ACY {NSSOA) FOR A CONTOUR INTERVAL OF
1- FOOT AND A ijilJp SCALE OF 1 •=40'. CO
NTOORS W,lH IN \'.EGETATIEO AREA$ ANO
$HA0O1'1 OIJllLNED AREA MAY NOT

MEET MAPPING STANDAR

DS ANO SHOULD
BE Fl[LQ
CHECKEO. TIHIS COMPUTER
PLOTTED ~AP WAS GE

NERATED SY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
MEiTHODS BY
KIER+i<RIGHT. JOB NUMBER A21'1',51. DATE or PHOTOGRAPHY AUCUST 2, 2021.
- CTV-----
,.--100-----
--ror _______ _
-
E-----
- FO-----
- rs __ .....,,___
- G->-----eGM
- JT-----
----0--
-0H-----
---
·
---
+- 100..00
- SD---0-1111 - SD------o--©
= SDl====
-
-SL-----
- T-----
- CTV-----
c~
-1/1--_..,1---
W ===== ---RW- -~,,., __
=Rw====· ~rs-----
• III
IXI
• 12"TIR
..

CABLE TEL.£\IISION
CONCHlETE CURB
CONC!ilm CURB & wmR
MAJOO CONTOUR UN[
MlllOR CON TOUR IUNE
EDGE Of PAWMBNT

ELECTRIC UNE

FENCE LINE
ABER Oli''lilCS LINE
ARE SERI/ICE LINE &: VA!LVE.

G_AS LINE-VA
L\'E & ME1ER
JotNT '!REN CH LINE
LOT LitrlE
t.lDNLJMEN!/iMONUt.lENT LINE
O\iERHEAD POWER LINE
PROPERTY L!r-!E
SANI
TARY SEIER UNE"'l!i\lllOLE & CW.NOOT
SANITARY SE\litll UNE OvER 24"[)1At.lETER
SIDEWALK SPOT E!l£VA TION
STO!lt.l DRAIN l!Jt£-I.IANHOLE & CATCH BASIi
STOOi.i DRAIN ll.lhl::- l,IANHOLE & CA Till BASIi
STOfit.l DRAIN LINE 01/ER 24"DIAt.lETEI!
STREET ILIG~T CQN[,IJIT LINE
TELEPl-!Or.lE IUl'IE
GABL.£ 1iEJL.£\IISION LINE
'll!EE/BRUSH CANOPY
TOP OF BANK TOE Of IBAl'IK
WAT8R UNE & VALVE WA TBR LINE OVER 24-"0IIIUETE.fi
REOLAIMED WAi1ER ILI
NE & '/Af_Vf.

RECLAIMED WAiTER IUNE O\!'ER 2a!!"OlAf.lETER
TRA!fl'IC
SIGNAl
Ji/NOOE

A/REA DRAIN
BOllARD [U
NLESS OlHERWISE NOTED,)
EL£CliROUER FlRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FlRE H'l'DRANIT POM:R f'OLE/JOINIT PULE
TRA!l'ISFOOMER
'TRA!mc
SIGN
WAT8R VALVE
TREE

UTILITY BOX
UTILITY LINE MARKEil
AO AR EA DRAINI IR/W Rll)HT OF WA Y
BLRO BCUARO IR\\S RECYCLED WATER BOX
BW BACK OF WALIK IRE RI~ El.E\IATION
C CONCRETE IR\\B REC
YCI..ED WATER BOX
CB CATCH BASIN IR\\IIIH RECYCI..ED WATER MANHOLE
CLF
CHAIN LINK FENCE IRWV RECYCI..ED WATER VALVE
Ct.IP COORUGi'.lED METAL PIPE SD STORM DR ,Ill N
co CI..EANOUT SDMH STOR!ol DRNIN l.4ANHDLE
DI
DRAIN IN!IT ssco SANIT AR t SEWER CL£ANOO T
EB EIJECTRIC BOX SSMH SANITARt SEWER MANHClE
EP EDGE OF PA\IEMENT ~LB STREET UGH T BOX

EW EDGE

OF WALK TELEPHONE
EV El!ECTRIC VAULT TC TOP OF CURB

FG FACE OF CURB TB TELE

PHONE BOX
FL FLOI\\.INE TOE

TOE OF BANK

GB GRADE BREAK TOP

TOP OF BANK
GLM GAS LINE i,jARKER TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE

L/S LANDSCAPE TYP, TYPICAL
MON MONUMENT IUB UlllLIT'/ BOX
p PA\IEl.lENT VG VAULEY
GUffiR
! pp POWER PClE \'CP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
(IP) PER PLAN l'4l WATER [>OX
PVC POL Y\'IN'fl
CHLORIDE 1/rM WATER MEITR

RCP REIN FORCED CONCRETE
PIPE I\R WATER
RISER {,n,,

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
1---
:I
0 '
et:
10:::
w
'
:~
No.
9179
09- 2-'1- 2021
DATE
-
, -.i:cs---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRAWING NAME: Y: \Projects-F0\2021\210J800 - Rosevllle 6 Soccer Complex\CAD\_EXC-RSC.dwg PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46

STROLLER PARKING
VAN
VAN
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
VAN +12
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAPEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED DURING FIRST WEEK OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL REMAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF DURING MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE ADJUSTED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION WITH APPROVAL OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP STREETS AND PARKING AREAS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION WITH STREET SWEEPER AS REQUIRED TO KEEP PAVING CLEAN OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND SYM. DESCRIPTION DET REF FILTER FABRIC TO BE SECURELY ATTACHED TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TOP AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE LIMIT OF WORK FILTER ROLL BARRIER CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AREA - PROVIDE A WASHOUT BIN FOR CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AND REMOVE AT END OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRY DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 1 L2.1 B,C L2.2AL2.2CL2.2
B 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE G - REFER TO SHEET L2.8 MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L2.2

LIMIT OF WORK
LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1"=20'-0" L2.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.1 L2.2 L2.3 L2.4 L2.5 L2.8 L2.9 L2.11 L2.12 L2.13 L2.14 L2.6 L2.7 L2.10 B
A
C INLET SEDIMENT CONTROL INSTALLATION (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-7) NTS STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION INSTALLATION (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-11) NTS SILT FENCE INFORMATION (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-6) NTS 8 0 .D V
®
• ---------------~----------
w
_J _J
LL >
0 bJ
U) 0
0 Ct:

Z LL
<( 0
_J
>-
f----
u
"" 0)
n ""
co - no
I I
00 LO -
oNI
-""
00 z z
. o_
u <(
0 0
-----------------
!
•
•
•
o=--@
i ,'
. !
..
..
..
..
ii
..
.. ! •
..
..
. .
. . ! •
--------------------------------------------------
w
0 ci
ITT
----------1--------------------------------------------- --------- 1 I I
-----
.
-
I
0----@
--------
-----------------
-----------------------
-----------
-------------
0 -------

I I I I I
------
0 ------
I
1 I
I
I
',U
r- _fS0...
0 0
(
'
• '
. ....................... .
. ....................... .
.........................
.........................
.........................
:::::::::::::::::::::::.· 1-.. -,-,-,-,--.--.-.--.--,-,-.--.-.-........... . ·······················
......................... 1··
······················· ...................... .. .:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:-:-:•:j'c':•:•:• .::£. •:•:•:•:::.;.,.~::'.•:•:•:•:•:•:•: ····· .. ? ............... . .... ................... .
.... ................... .
........................
~ - ~ -~~···········
• :f.•:• :•: • :•: •: • :•: •:• :•: • :•: •: • :•: •:• :•: • :•: •: •: ., ....................... . ....................... .
.. ... ....................
.........................
......................... .........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
.........................
......................... .........................
~:t-.:.• ..... ..-.-.-; ... :':~ .•. • :::::. -----
:.
;l·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:· .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ~:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:· ......... · ..... · ..... . > ...... ........ ........ .. .
:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:-:•:•:•C<f:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•
........... ........... . :.:.::.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:::::: •• :::: .% ;';3-------"
~ ~~ ....
•
\\"
'"'--
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
_J
I
+
+
\
I
I
\
+ %-
/
' N I \
'!

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
'
L

I I I I I I I I I I I
•-
I I
:~

I I I I I I I
--= -------------
{~
-----
I_
I
-~-~\- -
I
I
I I
_

I I I I I I I I
_.___
. ............. .
. ............. .
...............
...............
...............
...............
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + +
2" X 2" WOOD STAI(£
UMPED 8,liCl<FIU:

KCY IN rCNCC FABRIC
,.
/ FENCE ENO STAKES
/ {SEC NOTE 2)
•
• •
FENCE END DETAIi.

FENCE SECTION DETAIL
"'
FA8RtC {SEC NOTES 6 AND 7)
FABRIC (SEE NOT£ 8)\
:2" JC 2~ WOOD ST41CES
(SEE NOTE 3)
NOTES:
8 8 8 8

1. CONSTRUCT THC LOIGTH Of EliCH REACH $0 TH.6.T THC
CHANG[ !N 8~$( ELEVATION liLONC THE REACH DOCS NOT
EXCEED 1/J TlsC NlEGHT or THC LINCloR BliRRIER. IN NO
C.liSC SH.It.LL TH£ ROCH LENGTH CXCCEO ~9 0'
:2. THE u.sr a· or FENCE SH~U BE TURNED UP SLOPE •
J. ST.l,KE DIMENSIONS ~RE NOMl/t~L.
,. 0IMCNSI0tfS r.lAY V.t..RY TO flT nELO CONDITION.
:,, STAKES SHALL BE SP.I.CEO AT ti' M,IJ( ANO SHAU. Bl'. l'OSITI0NEO ON THE DOWNSTR(liM $10E OF THE rENCC,

6. OVERLAP STAKES. ANO FOLD f [t!CC FABRIC AROUND
EACH STAKE ONE nJU. TURN •

7. STAKE SHALL BC DRIVEN TIGHllY TOGETHER TO PRO'ENT
POTElfTIAL FLOW THROUGH or SEDIMENT Ar THE JOINT.

5. FOR ENO ST.6.KE CON0ITI0.~ FOLD FENCE f"ABRIC .t..ROUN0 (:2) STAKCS (1\ FULL TURN AND SECURE: WITH (,) STAPLES • 9. MIKIMUM (, ) S 1.PLES PER STlilC[ • 1 0. CROSS 8ARJ:l l[RS, SUCH AS SAl'I0 B"G OloMS. SHl,U. BE A WINIMUM or 1/l ANO A M,IJ(IMI.IM or 1/2 TH( HEIGHT OF THE SILT HNCC.
ur·· ,_· J l "-._ 2WM 0lAMEHR MIN WIRE STAPLE

STAPLE DETAIL
"'
~,xd-
- 0IR(CT0R or PU9l..iC W0R~S/CITT [NGlN(O
/!) ifOSE'fiLLE C A IIIO l.,A 0EPAIHMENT or PUBLIC WORKS

JOINT DETAIL END STAKE DETAIL SILT FENCE

INFORMATION DETAIL
..

GRAVEL 8AG{S) OR OTHER lo.CC(PTCD
SC0IMENT C0N1R0L BMP. PLACE BAGS
TIGHT ACAll'l-;T r1icc or CURB .

BACIC OF CURB
FliC( OF CURB
SCliLE: NONE
R[VISC0, II.PAIL 2007
DRAWN BY: STAFF
APPRO~E0 BY: R JEN:SCN
FLOW
B~P-G

UP OF GUTTER
OR ... ltlliCE INLU WITH FILTER BliG (SC( BMP-8)
Pl.AN
VIEW
"""" , . Sl'.0IMENT TRAPPED UPSTREAM or SEDIMEl'IT CONTROL BMP :SHliLL BC REMOvt0 WEEKLY ANO PRIOR TO A AAINFI.Ll EVCHT, OR .6.T THE DISCRETION or Ti-;[ PURUC WORICS INSPECTOR, 2, PU.CC BMP"S rlGHTLY TOGETHER U JOlNlS TO PREVENT
SEEPAGE ,\T JOINTS.

J. VSC TO INHIBIT STO.IIMWATCR ANO i'IDN-STORMWATER rt.OW. ,. SEDIMENT CONTROL MEliSURES SHliU. 8E PROPERLY M.6.IHTAINE0, RY THE C0NTAACTOR.
/.

SlLT FDIC[ ( PER RMP-s)
/
CEOTEXTILE 1:!UNKET
/RAIN INU:T
i
SHEET now
i.t:SS MN
I ACRE

SECTION A-A
"''
"""" 1
_ roR USE IN liRE.f.S WHERE CRli0INC HAS 8Cnl C0OIPL£TEO ANO FINAL SOIL STAStUZA.TION ANO SEEDtNG ARC PENDING.

2. ~OT ,\PPUCABL:: IN P,\VC0 .t..REAS.

3. NOT APPLICABLE IN CONCENTRATED nows,
I
-
-
I
-
DIRECTOR Of PLIBUC IW0~KS/CITT ENGINEER

DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC WORKS

INLET SEDI MENT CONTROL

INSTALLATION DETAIL
Si:ALC: NONE
REVISED: APRtl 2007
DRAWN SY: STArr
APPROVCO BY: R J[IISEN
/!RAIN INLET /i• M ENOS
' - I
-
I
PLAN

IN OVERLAP AT
or SILT F'El<CE
DI

PROTECTION
TYPE
HTS
DIRECTOR or PIJ8UC W0l'!~S/CITY El'IGIN£[R
DCP.t.RTMCNT or

PUBLIC WORKS

STORM DRAIN INLET

PROTECTION INSTALLA
TION
:SCM.E: NON[
REVISCO! ,l,f'~L 2007
ORAWN BY: STAFF

APPROVED BY, R JENSEN
BMP-11

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
EXPIRATION DATE:

JULY 2023 "1:(-
f/j < or --CAll~\J'" ""*
NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING VAN NO PARKING NO PARKING BUS PARKING PASSENGER DROP OFF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAPEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED DURING FIRST WEEK OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL REMAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF DURING MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE ADJUSTED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION WITH APPROVAL OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP STREETS AND PARKING AREAS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION WITH STREET SWEEPER AS REQUIRED TO KEEP PAVING CLEAN OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND SYM. DESCRIPTION DET REF FILTER FABRIC TO BE SECURELY ATTACHED TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TOP AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE LIMIT OF WORK FILTER ROLL BARRIER CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AREA - PROVIDE A WASHOUT BIN FOR CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AND REMOVE AT END OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRY DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 1 L2.1 B,C L2.2AL2.2CL2.2B 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE H - REFER TO SHEET L2.8 MATCHLINE I - REFER TO SHEET L2.9 MATCHLINE A - REFER TO SHEET L2.1
MATCHLINE B - REFER TO SHEET L3.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1"=20'-0" L2.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.1 L2.2 L2.4 L2.5 L2.8 L2.9 L2.11 L2.12 L2.13 L2.14 L2.6 L2.7 L2.10 L2.3 BAC FIBER ROLLS INSTALLATION (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-5) NTS CONCRETE WASHOUT INSTALLATION (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-10) NTS STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION SITE ACCESS (CITY OF ROSEVILLE STANDARD BMP-9) NTS f-+ r+ ~ I I ~- I "'+ I I I I I I I • ~1-~ 1111111111111111111111 I I I ,.__I -- --~------ -- --- \ \ \ -- -;r - - 1 , : ---=-~~ 16 : , 10\" i 1, __ -I ~~~2A,;z,.U- •~---- 1- ---------- I ?~ - :i-------- ~""" L - ---- 0 '1 - ------=:....: ~) '<>-, <o. 0-' I I I I I ---' I I ------- --- --- I I \--I I I I I I I I I j_ I I I I I I L I ' I r I I I I -1-· --- - - --- ----- \ ' .
u~ 't
~v
ci
Nm
ci
m
---
f
I
----
- !_ !_,."I""_.., -.~-'· "
_
J ______ -
I V
'
- ---- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- -- ------ -
- - - - - - - - - \ I .l - - - - -, - - - -
-----------------------------------------------v -'-------------------------------------------------r--- \ ------- ·--- -- ---
--
..
----------
----
/
----
---
---
1 I I I I I I
•
I
t==
I
••••11Hlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllli:llllllll
~- I
I
:;'' / 1
iiifi!H!ill~
-- --- - -- ----
• I
- 1-
1 •
----
\\~---- ---
- -
)
0 0 '),. '-'6'
~------
--------
-
--------------
---------
\~-
------
---
J
I
~-"& I '
1, ss·12'1(E~]g:__ _____ _ , __ _ -1
I
I
-(\)
I
I
I
-

WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
(PUBLIC R/W, W\Dil-1 ~\~~--
--
-
-----
------
' I
I
- ---1
I
I
I
I
I
'
I l I I I I I
I --
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + +
VERTIC"L SPACING MEASUR[D "L0MC
nu: FACE Of Tl-I[ SLOP( V"RIES
BCTWEEN &' - :20'

TYPICAL FIBER ROLL INSTALLATION
"'
"""' I. llf$TAll Fl8CR ROLLS IN ,._ ROW ALONG " LEVEL CONTOUR,

2. AT THE ENOS OF • ~W TUAN THE U.:ST TWO ftET UP SLOPE SLIGHTLY.

3. AT JOINTS f 113ER ROLLS SHIILL ilE OVERLAPPED, NOT ABUTTED. '""" I, CONSTRUCT SEDIMDH 8ARRIER
8 8 8 8
Fl8£R ROLI. 8" MIN
INSTALL A Fl8[R ROLL

NOR WHERE SLOPE
TIU.NSIT!ONS INTO A

STEEPER SLOPE

SECTION A-A
"''
DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC WORKS/CITY !:NCINHII
O[PAIHM(Nf OF

PUBLIC WORKS

FIBER ROLLS

INSTALLATION DETAIL
SCALE: l<IONE
R™SEO, APRIL 2007
DRAWN BY: STAFF
APPROVED BY: R JENSEN
CRUSHED AGGR[G.<,T[ GREATER Tl'iAN ,S"
8UT SM.\I.LER TH.\N 6"
BMP-5
CORRUC:oi.TEO STEEL PANELS
"NO CHAJ,IN[UZE RUNOFF TO
SEOIMnlT TRAPPING O[VICE 12" MIN UNLESS OTHERWISE'. ..,, r ORtG..-Al SPfCIFIEO SY A SOf'IC,eS~<~,~Q~,<~'<f'""''2'J,iua.,"""'-'"'~""-»JCii'l:ii,o\j--'---- 2~ 1120' WIM rr==i'I / SEDIMENT TRAPPING lbd' DEVICE
.! rn / CORRUGAT£D STEEL PANELS
'-.../• \,e -
SECTION 8-8
""
MATCH
[)(!STING
CRAOE
10 MIL
Pu.snc LINING
•
.J
PLAN
STAKE
(m)

1.125 STEEL WI~•
STIU.W BA.LE 4'
'"'' 7
DIRECTOR Of PUBLIC "'ORKVCITY [MQIMEU!
=• !/!Jr ROSh LLE
~
.
" '" ....
0EP-'RTM[HT 01"
PUBLIC WOii!($

STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION

SITE ACCESS DETAIL
.....

SCill: MONE
IICVISEO: APRIL 2007
DRAWN BY: su.rr
APPROVED 91': It JENSEN

1. ACTlJAL U.YOUT DETERMINED IN FIELD
BMP-9

2. THE CONCRCTE WASHOUT SIGN SHM.L BC INSTALLED
WITHIN 30 ' OF TH[ TEMPORARY CONCRETE
WASHOUT F.I.CIUTY.
l. WASHOUT BASIN SHALL BE M,t,INTAlt.EO IN GOOD
CONDITION er THE CONTRACTOR.

4. Wl-l[N NEEOCO, PLASTIC UHING M-ID ORY A[SIOUC Stt.l,Ll B[ REMOVED ANO PROPERLY DISPOSED or AND A M£W
U NCR INSUUEO.

ABOVE GRADE WASHOUT

WITH STRAW BALES

STAPLE DETAIL
""
ST4.PLES
(2 PER B.\U)
NATNE MH[Rlli,l
(OPTIONAL}

SECTION
"'
10 ,Ill
PLASTIC Ul~INC
BINOINC: WIRE STRAW BALE

PLYWOOD
~ • X 24"

PAINTED WHITE
BU.CK LCTTERS
6" HEIGHT
4X .5 LAG SCRCWS .,, ,.,&, -

WOOD OR
METAL STAX[S
(2 l'[R BALE)
B-B

WOOD PQST
'f+ s rxJ·xa·
~CRETE WASHOUT

SIGN DETAIL
(OR EOUIV ... LENT)
"''
DIRECTOR or ~~eue WORKS/CITY [NGIN([~
OEPARTMENT or

PUBLIC WORKS

CONCRETE WASHOUT

INSTALLATION
SCALE: NONE
R(VISED: APRIL 2007
OR.I.WM BY: STAFF
APPROVED 9~: R JENSEN
Bt.4P-10

VERDE DESIGN
LANDSCAPE ARCHIT!CTURE
CIVIL E!;GINEERING
SPORT PIAlt'llNG & DESIGN
1843 Iron Poht Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916.415.6554
I= 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
VAN NO PARKING 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. DATE ISSUED SCALE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY DATE CONSULTANT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS NO. REVISIONS SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAPEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED DURING FIRST WEEK OF CONSTRUCTION. 2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL REMAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF DURING MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE ADJUSTED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION WITH APPROVAL OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP STREETS AND PARKING AREAS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION WITH STREET SWEEPER AS REQUIRED TO KEEP PAVING CLEAN OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND SYM. DESCRIPTION DET REF FILTER FABRIC TO BE SECURELY ATTACHED TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TOP AND PERIMETER SILT FENCE LIMIT OF WORK FILTER ROLL BARRIER CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AREA - PROVIDE A WASHOUT BIN FOR CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AND REMOVE AT END OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRY DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 1 L2.1 B,C L2.2AL2.2CL2.2B 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE J - REFER TO SHEET L2.10 MATCHLINE B - REFER TO SHEET L3.2
MATCHLINE C - REFER TO SHEET L2.4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1"=20'-0" L2.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.1 L2.2 L2.4 L2.5 L2.8 L2.9 L2.11 L2.12 L2.13 L2.14 L2.6 L2.7 L2.10 L2.3 LL(i C ., L C -L Cc_, Lin u .u C LJ Lo ce:: fr:~ L ' 0 C, CZ cQ LL VJ ",:, '"> c, C r'-~ ~, ,.o ~;,' u Le r. C' zc, ,, f:::' LL:.,; ,u 5~ c2 "' ,,_ ,,-< ,, '" '.'.:~ (.C "" E: i3 L C '·:J Cl: -- •O:'.-' LL c_l ,- - _g --------- --- ----
--------
-
'
LJ
cc:
----
0---@
o----@
o---@
()
\
I I I
------•
1: ,~-----,--------j-----------1--
j/ I
I I I
' I

I I I I I I
~--------+-------- I ---;.--
,I ' 1/ I ' , I I 11 "}>'
,:1 j 'I ,,
'
//:
_ _,,;:· I
_..,..-/ : L--•f I
C ,, "----", I
"?/'/ ii
I
• I

I I I I I I I I
I
t"
I
+ + +
+ + + +
+ + +
8 8 8 8

VERDE DESIGN

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

CIVIL ENGINEERING

SPORT PLANNING & DESIGN
1843 Iron Point Rd. Suite 140
Folsom, CA 95630
tel: 916A 15.6554
fax1 916.415.6525
www.VerdeDesignlnc.com
- '
-.i:cs .. DRAWING ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME: C: \Users \STA 110~2\AppDoto \Local\ Temp \AcPublish_J2204 \_SWP-RSC.dwg ..

PLOT DATE: 04-28-22 PLOTTED BY: statlon46
1 1
1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 SHEET NO. PROJ. NO. SCALE DATE ISSUED CHECKED BY DRAWN BY DATE PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NAME SHEET TITLE CONSULTANT REVISIONS NO. SUBMITTAL STAMP DATE ROSEVILLE SOCCER COMPLEX 2600 WESTBROOK BLVD ROSEVILLE, CA 95747 30% SUBMITTAL 04/29/22 04/29/20222103800 KEY MAPEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 2. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL REMAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND BE REMOVED AND 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED DURING FIRST WEEK OF CONSTRUCTION. DISPOSED OF DURING MAINTENANCE PERIOD. 3. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MAY BE ADJUSTED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION WITH APPROVAL OR AS DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL SWEEP STREETS AND PARKING AREAS AFFECTED BY CONSTRUCTION WITH STREET SWEEPER AS REQUIRED TO KEEP PAVING CLEAN OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. SYM. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND DESCRIPTION REF DET DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRY CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREA WASHOUT AND REMOVE AT END OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION WASHOUT AREA - PROVIDE A WASHOUT BIN FOR CONSTRUCTION FILTER ROLL BARRIER LIMIT OF WORK SILT FENCE FILTER FABRIC TO BE SECURELY ATTACHED TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE TOP AND PERIMETER 1 L2.2 L2.1 B,C AL2.2CL2.2
B 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' NORTH MATCHLINE K - REFER TO SHEET L2.11 MATCHLINE C - REFER TO SHEET L2.3
MATCHLINE D - REFER TO SHEET L2.5 ERIOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1"=20'-0" L2.4 ERIOSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN L2.1 L2.2 L2.4 L2.5 L2.8 L2.12 L2.11 L2.9 L2.14 L2.13 L2.6 L2.7 L2.3 L2.10 ~□ :;~
~~ oz
□
f.l ~ ~
~
0~
~ .. N~ ',,
"'o ,!,]"
N~
,
cl
;,,,::;
3§ E:lf
a,o
~~
··m 0
-□ ,; ' ~~ g,
it[
ii"
"'
0 ~
~
r
I
§
c
' ~
~
!
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS, AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF VERDE DESIGN. INC. AND WERE CREATED, EVOLVED, AND DE\JELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS. DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED, REPRODUCED, OR PUBLISHED BY ANY METHOD, IN \'MOLE OR IN PART, OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM. OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE 'M-1ATSOEVER WITI-IOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF VERDE DESIGN, INC. [>\[>I[>\[>\[>\[>
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I \ 1--=.-~:~}~WLJij _:t-:_~ r- -:" .. -\ --- 1'. 11 .47 TC -- --],. . I 11 " I' ..... .,,,. ,, / '\ I Ii I I -- ---- I \ ► I !'l~ 1 ,/ , ...,,. ,.-· I .,,,- , I 1]' I \ ,,~ / ,, ti-~ -i-f/---,---------1-~---------~ -----------:7------------ X ~;_·""" _,_ -------i1----~ ------~ ----, _; .c ... ~c ,"' ,.,. (
., -s~ ,0
'-?,
,c ~~
l'o,'0·
. '91 ~
'.¼ n' c" l,,c\ I i \ ,", ' ,,. 'f I I I I Jxe, o,_,"':i·1 I I ,;;:,.- 1 1 \ I ~ ____ 71 I -
, , I I I ii I 1
1 , \
-I I I I I I ' '
I I I I :, \
I I I \I I ;,• I 1' I
I I .• I ' ' I I I I I I, : ,
I I I ~,I \ I 1, ', ,. I ;-1 I II 1 ✓ I I ·'I' I I ✓ I 1, : I I I I I :

J.-: . 11 I ii I □ I :: \
'
\
' I
'
I "
,c
+ _o,_,":l·
1 I I , ........ __ I --~-
► L _J I > J
J
I
,;,
'°Y-c
+~ ·
1 rl 111 I : 1: ::
o/' ,' I 'I I\ I I I, ' ,0- I I I I '
o/'' 'I 11 I I
A\' ,r"
.,,
a'
,c
'V fr /" \
2,
·6',, _.-:)
"' C
I
' I
' I
'.
\~
'"' 1: 0
'"' I~
i!
•o
I~
,er
I
' I
' I
'
I
' I
'
I
I

I I I I I I I
I I ,,: I : J •
i"
la
i0,
V.y"
I Ii Iii I L ____ llJ-~-------f-~--+---t--~t =--~-;r~1 @ • _11 ___ i-'V!I· I i1 I :

Oit I' I l
,, I I I ----7 ' '
c· ,::
.,.,
,,-
,,
✓-
a' rt".3
C
,c 31,
.,.
,c
"'~ v•'·
C!,k,.. II I C ' '
,0 ' ' ' ' : ? '
o,_,lx<::;, I ' I ' ' i ' , '
' . ' I ' ' , , ' I I ' I ,, 11 ' l 0:,'t..'-:J ,I'°-' o ' "'
I I 11 I ✓ I
I I I I, :

I I 11 I 11 i
I ~ r, I 11 I~+\ ------::;t--1===,-------- I~!~-~ I i •• i~ i ,,•'1 ,c, ~-, -,~ ~, _,,_
,I 11 : I I I
I
L ____ J . :/1
" -
" I
11 ►
,----7 ,[/[
I/ !
<i> I I I ► I
7 I I
, I ► I
►
>~
/
:7/•:•'·"•:'·' --~--~ ~~~ •'->·.'-<·~ ·,:"'"
//'·- --.,.___ '··
/~ ---+- "'' / '(/ /- ,;, -~ \11' -~
I" 'I \
< l ,
J
,,<'
J
J
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
u-------+- --1 I I I! II ""
-II - -+---1 ------;t-,, IT LL,
' - -- llli -- I 94.0Sl]C ►
I
I
I
I
I
I
r I - ~ ·• - \ J I
J Jl
'
I
I
i
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' '
'
' i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
I
I
I
I
' I
I
' I
I
I
' I
I
,
I
'
I
'
I
' I Landscape ,
,,. ""
Va:,~·
;,,
""? ,0
'-?,
I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
' I
'
.;/
c ,' ., -9_,
o/'"
,,
s" '"
c;,--
+
~,~'.!'
0 ~
; ,1
' C I
•'" ~I,-, 0
, ~":,~ I I ,rr-~
<b
,I - -, -· ' . I I-
.I
_, I I
.I I - I :