Roseville City Council
March 1, 2023

AGENDA
March 1, 2023

CITY COUNCIL

HOUSING AUTHORITY
6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California
www.roseville.ca.us
The meeting may be viewed on Comcast channel 14, Consolidated Communications channel 73, and AT&T U-Verse. City Council meetings are also video streamed live on the City’s website at roseville.ca.us/watch and roseville.ca.us/agenda, and the City’s YouTube channel at youtube.com/CityofRosevilleCa.

If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact Voice: 916-774-5200, TDD: 916-774-5220. Requests must be made as early as possible.

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WELCOMES YOUR PARTICIPATION
If an agenda item is open to public comment, such public comment shall be addressed to the chair of the meeting.

Public Comment
- Speakers have three minutes under Public Comment to speak on issues that
are not listed on the agenda and are within the City's jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda.

Consent Calendar
- If applicable, the Consent Calendar consists of routine items that may be approved by one motion. Any person can remove an item from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately.

Agenda Items
- Speakers have five minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Americans with Disabilities Act
- Notify the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance if special assistance is required to participate in a meeting including the need of auxiliary aids or services.

Audio/Visual Presentations
- If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance.

Security procedures are in place to attend Roseville City Council meetings.

All attendees must
successfully pass through a security metal detector.

Any person with a prohibited item will not be
allowed entry.

Prohibited items include, but are not limited to: firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/ any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs and alcohol.

Roseville City Clerk 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 916-774-5200 TDD 916-774-5220

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. MEETING PROCEDURES

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Bids / Purchases / Services

6.1. Special Inspection and Materials Testing Services - Contract Purchase Agreement
Memo from Administrative Technician Darci Carpenter and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-083 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

BLACKBURN CONSULTING, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002715).

Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with Blackburn Consulting for Special Inspection and Materials Testing. This is a multi-year contract with an initial term of 28 months (through June 30, 2025) with two (2) optional renewal years. The compensation amount for the initial 28-month term will be $450,000. Compensation for the two (2) optional one (1) year renewals will be $150,000 per year. Work performed under this agreement will use capital rehabilitation funds and/or capital improvement project funds in the approved City budget.

CC #:
2573
File #: 0804
CONTACT:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

6.2. X-Ray Imaging System - Sole Source Purchase Order and Budget Adjustment Memo from Management Analyst Mark Peinado and Police Chief Troy Bergstrom recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6620 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council authorize a sole source purchase order to Logos Imaging LLC, for the purchase of an X-ray imaging system in the amount of $87,375.

Additionally, staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $35,995. The Roseville Police Department was approved funding for this purchase in the amount of $51,380 from the Placer County Office of Emergency Services through the Homeland Security Grant Program. The budget adjustment will increase the capital outlay budget in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund by $35,995 to cover the remaining cost of the X-ray system. There will be no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

CC #:
2562
File #:
0203-12 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]
Jeff Beigh 916-746-1058 [email protected]

Resolutions

6.3. Placer Valley Tourism - 2023 Strategic Marketing Plan and Budget Approval Memo from Management Analyst Jeannine Thrash and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-082 APPROVING THE 2023

PLACER VALLEY TOURISM STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN AND
BUDGET. Staff requests Council
approve the 2023 Placer Valley Tourism
Strategic Marketing Plan and Budget. The South Placer County Tourism Corporation, dba Placer Valley Tourism (PVT), promotes and supports tourism efforts that generate overnight stays within the region. Funding for these PVT activities is derived from room night assessments for all hotels in the cities of Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville, and has no impact to the City's General Fund.

These assessments were voted on and approved by all of the affected hotel owners in 2014. There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation.

CC #:
2572
File #:
0110-01
CONTACT:

Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]

Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]

6.4. Homeless Outreach Worker - Contract Amendment
Memo from Housing Analyst Suzanne Acrell and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-080 APPROVING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE COUNTY OF

PLACER, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve
the Homeless Outreach Worker Contract Amendment between Placer County Adult System of Care and the City. The recommended amendment will extend the contract through December 31, 2023 and supports the City's goal to maintain a safe and healthy community. There is no additional funding request, and no General Fund resources will be used for the amendment. The City’s portion of this contract was originally funded with Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds. No General Fund resources were used for the Homeless Outreach Worker Contract and no additional funding is being requested at this time.

CC #:
2569
File #:
0709
CONTACT:

Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected]

6.5. Fiscal Year 2022-23 Transportation Development Act Claim Memo from Transportation Grants Analyst Cameron Schreiter and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-078 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF THE 2022/23 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT

CLAIMS TO THE PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
AGENCY. Staff requests Council approve the FY2022-23 Transportation Development Act claim in the amount of $13,466,680, and approve payment of Fiscal Year 2022/23 Local Transportation Fund funds to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) in the amount of $56,250 for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

CC #:
2567
File #:
0721
CONTACT:

Cameron Schreiter
916-746-1302
[email protected]

6.6. Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund - Grant Application Memo from Alternative Transportation Manager Ed Scofield and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-075 APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO

THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO

EXECUTE ALL RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund to provide additional funding for Roseville Transit’s new Proterra electric buses. The total estimated cost for each new electric Proterra bus is $1.2 million. The funding for all seventeen (17) buses is secured. The majority of the funding is coming from federal
Low or No Emission Vehicle Program
grant
funds and state Solutions for Congested Corridors Program funds. Currently, Local Transportation Funds (LTF) will be used as the required local matching dollars. If successful in securing the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Funds, the trust funds will replace the LTF local match in the amount of $180,000 per bus saving the City's LTF for other projects.

CC #:
2563
File #:
0721 & 0214
CONTACT:

Ed Scofield 916-869-9109 [email protected]

6.7. Sierra Vista Parcels DF-1 & DF-2 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Cody Allen
and Development Services
Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-074 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Sierra Vista Parcels DF-1 & DF-2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION",

AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON
THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2561
File #:
0400-04-12-1
CONTACT:

Cody Allen 916-517-7598 [email protected]

6.8. Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6A2 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector
Troy Galvin
and Development Services
Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-073 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT
RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F-6A2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
"NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL

DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE
SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2556
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441 jtg
[email protected]

6.9. Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6A1 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector
Troy Galvin
and Development Services
Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-072 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT
RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F-6A1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE
"NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL

DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE
SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #:
2555
File #:
0400-04-09-1
CONTACT:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441 jtg
[email protected]

6.10. Electric Generation Maintenance and Rehabilitation Support Services - Northern California Power Agency Support Services Program Agreement Memo from Power Generation Superintendent Matthew Garner and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-081 APPROVING A CONFIRMATION UNDER THE

SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING THE ELECTRIC

UTILITY DIRECTOR AND CITY ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council authorize the Electric Utility Director and the City Attorney to execute a Confirmation under the Support Services Program Agreement with the Northern California Power Agency for Performance Mechanical Inc. to perform maintenance support and rehabilitation services at Roseville Electric owned or operated generation facilities. The total cost of services will not exceed $751,675. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget for FY2022-23.

CC #:
2570
File #:
0800-03
CONTACT:

Matt Garner 916-746-1691 [email protected]

6.11. Child Development Services Fiscal Year 2023-24 Agreement Memo from Parks, Recreations, & Libraries
Manager
Jeff Nereson and Parks,
Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-077

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE.

Staff requests Council approve
a contract with the California
Department of Social Services for the purpose of providing child care services for FY2023-24.

The City can receive a maximum reimbursable amount of $478,904 in FY2023-24 to offset direct program expenses. There is no General Fund impact as the program is funded in the Youth Development Fund.

CC #:
2566
File #:
0704
CONTACT:

Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected]

Ordinances (for introduction and first reading)

6.12. Military Equipment Policy
Memo from Police Captain Doug Blake and Police Chief Troy Bergstrom recommending the City Council adopt findings pursuant to California Government Code Sections 7071 and 7072, and introduce for first reading an ORDINANCE RENEWING CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDINANCE 6463

AND READOPTING AND CONTINUING ROSEVILLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT POLICY NO. 706, TITLED “MILITARY EQUIPMENT" as defined by Government Code Section 7070. Assembly Bill 481 required the City Council to adopt an ordinance and policy allowing the Police Department to use and acquire “military equipment”. To continue to use “military equipment” each year, the City Council is required to review and renew the ordinance and military equipment policy. There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

CC #:
2565
File #:
0323-01
CONTACT:

Doug Blake 916-746 1043 [email protected]

Troy Bergstrom 916-774-5058 [email protected]

Ordinances (for introduction and adoption - appropriation/urgency measures)

6.13. Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus - Budget Adjustment Memo from Assistant Fire Chief Jason Rizzi and Fire Chief Rick Bartee recommending the City Council
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6619
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $183,785 to reallocate funds for the purchase of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) equipment.

The equipment purchase will be funded through existing funds budgeted for equipment in the Fire Academy no longer needed for $109,685, a vendor credit of $56,000 for returned SCBA equipment purchased in a prior year, and $18,100 from the sale of obsolete SCBA equipment. No additional General Fund resources are requested.

CC #:
2560
File #:
0203-12 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Jason Rizzi 916-774-5802 [email protected]

6.14. The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail Project - Reimbursement Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Assistant Transportation Planner Suzanne Engelke and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-076 APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6621 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council
approve
the
Reimbursement Agreement for a portion of The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail project between the City and John Mourier Construction Inc., in the amount of
$109,484, and
approve a budget adjustment
in the amount of $140,461 for the construction of The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail project.

Another entity FD-24 LLC is grading a small
portion on the trail for $30,977 which will be authorized under a separate reimbursement agreement. The budget adjustment with this item authorizes funding for both of the agreements. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

CC #:
2564
File #:
0400-04-12-1 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected]

Ordinances (for second reading and adoption)

6.15. Second Reading - North Central Roseville Specific Plan Parcel 42A (572 Gibson Drive) – Shea Properties Apartments Rezone Project ORDINANCE NO. 6623 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6624 ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

ROSEVILLE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE
, for second reading and adoption.

CC #:
2575
File #:
0400-04-04-2
CONTACT:

Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected]

Reports / Requests

6.16. Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy - 2023 Memo from Government Relations Administrator Mark Wolinski and Deputy City Manager Megan Scheid recommending the City Council adopt the Legislative Platform which includes a set of priorities, legislative principles and platforms to guide the City's State and Federal legislative and judicial advocacy programs through 2023. The State and Federal priorities and legislative platform defined within the document are the result of the City Council’s articulation of its goals and priorities during legislative updates and the City Council’s Legislative Platform Workshop held January 11, 2023.

The Legislative Platform conveys
the Council’s positions on issues that are currently, or are anticipated to be, the focus of future legislation by the State and Federal governments.

CC #:
2571
File #:
0114
CONTACT:

Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected]

6.17. HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL – Quarterly Status Update 4th Quarter 2022
Memo from Housing Supervisor Suzi Cook-Turner and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council receive a quarterly report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program. This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.

CC #:
2559
File #:
0709-02-1
CONTACT:

Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected]

Ceremonial Documents

6.18. Proclamation - Procurement Month March 2023
Proclaim March 2023 as Procurement Month and March 8, 2023 as Procurement Professionals’ Day and urge all citizens to join the City of Roseville in recognizing the contribution and importance of our Purchasing Division employees and their impact within business, industry and government.

CC #:
2557
File #:
0102-10
CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

6.19. Resolution - Terri Shirhall
Commend Terri Shirhall for her 23 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville, congratulate her for her many accomplishments, and wish her a long, healthy and enjoyable retirement.

CC #:
2558
File #:
0102-10
CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

6.20. Resolution - Janet Vargas
Commend Janet Vargas for her 26 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville congratulate her for her accomplishments and wish her a long healthy and enjoyable retirement.

CC #:
2574
File #:
0102-10
CONTACT:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266
[email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

7. ORDINANCES

7.1. Gibson Park Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment Memo from Park Development Project Manager Heather Buck and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 23-079 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ABIDE BUILDERS, INC.,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6622

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council award the base bid plus alternates 1, 2, and 3 to Abide Builders, Inc. for a total contract award amount of $4,021,608. This will result in a total project budget of $4,912,257, which includes the cost of design and engineering, construction, permits, inspections, construction administration, and contingency. Staff also requests approval of a budget adjustment of $334,000
from the North Central Neighborhood Park Fund, and $1,701,500 from the Citywide Park Fund, to the Courts at Gibson Park Project. The Courts at Gibson Park Project is located on the 13.75-acre site off of Roseville Parkway and Gibson Drive near the Galleria. The approved master plan for this multi-generational sports court complex was approved in November 2020. This first phase of the park focuses on the lighted pickle ball courts and support features.

Staff requests authorization to
approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the contracted amount. Funding for the first phase of the project was approved in the
FY2020-21 Capital Improvement Project budget using the Citywide Park and North Central Neighborhood Park Funds.

A budget adjustment is requested to fund the
construction of nine pickleball courts, associated shade structures and site amenities.

Maintenance costs will be approximately $16,000/year/acre. The funding source for maintenance will be the General Fund.

CC #:
2568
File #:
0704-01 & 0201-01
CONTACT:

Heather Buck 916-774-5254 [email protected]

8. COUNCIL REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS

9. ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2573
File #: 0804
Title:

Special Inspection and Materials Testing Services - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract purchase agreement (
3002715
) with
Blackburn Consulting
to provide on-call s
pecial
inspection and materials testing
services through June 30, 2025. Staff also requests authorization to utilize the two (2) optional one (1) year renewals without further Council approval provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department released Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 01-063 for Special
Inspection and Materials Testing
in October of 2022 to solicit proposals to provide the City with on-call s
pecial inspection and materials testing
services. Twelve (12) proposals were received.

After review, staff recommends awarding a service agreement to Blackburn Consulting
for as-
needed services with the intent to enter into a multi-year agreement with an initial term of 28 months (through June 30, 2025) and two (2) optional one (1) year renewals.

FISCAL IMPACT
Work performed under this agreement will use capital rehabilitation funds and/or capital improvement project funds in the approved City budget. The contract purchase agreement will be a multi-year agreement with an initial term of 28 months (through June 30, 2025) and two (2) optional one-year renewals pending Council approval of the budget each year. The compensation amount for the initial 28-month term will be $450,000. Compensation for the two (2) optional one (1) year renewals will be $150,000 per year.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Darci Carpenter, Administrative Technician
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-083
3002715 CPA Blackburn Consulting
RESOLUTION NO. 23-083

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND BLACKBURN CONSULTING, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002715) for on-call special inspection and materials testing services, by and between the City of Roseville and Blackburn Consulting, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute two (2) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715
Supplier Details:

Company Blackburn Consulting
Contact Robert Lokteff
Address 2491 Boatman Ave
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Submit your response to:

Company City of Roseville
Contact Joanna Oukrop
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1102
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.

Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.

The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:

Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.

Insurance requirements:

The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715
Agreement 3002715
Agreement Date 25-JAN-2023
Change Order 2
Change Order Date 07-FEB-2023
Revision 1
Agreement Amount 450,000.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier Blackburn Consulting
2491 Boatman Ave
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:

Fax:

Email:
(916) 375-8706
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
The vendor shall provide the services called for under the City of Roseville Request for Proposal (RFP) 01-063 for on-call special inspection and materials testing services and contractor's proposal thereto titled "Proposal to the City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department" dated 11/9/22 (hereinafter "Proposal"). The terms and scope of work of City of Roseville RFP 01-063 and contractor's proposal are herein made part of this agreement and fully incorporated by reference. All work must be quoted and approved by an authorized member of the Facility Services Division before work can begin.

START DATE: Executed Agreement
END DATE: 6/30/25
Contact Rjahja Canlas in the Facility Services Division at (916) 774-5342 or [email protected] for questions regarding this agreement.

Note: The total agreement amount is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this contract.

Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 10934 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
Joanna Oukrop Phone 1-916-746-1102
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office.

2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Contract Terms and Conditions

Negotiated Ts and Cs for Blackburn Consulting (rev. 1/25/23)

1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, caused to the extent of the Contractor's negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole or active negligence or willful misconduct. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.

3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.

4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City has the right to terminate this Agreement, provided Contractor is given thirty (30) days written notice. City's termination shall be without further liability to City; however, Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.

6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.

7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.

8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.

9. All prevailing wages and fair employment practices must be adhered to. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices.

Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir.ca. gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.

10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage (except Workers' Compensation) and for ongoing and completed operations. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the full coverage and maximum limits of any insurance proceeds available to the named insureds, whichever is greater.
d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.

Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.

Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.

11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances, including but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville. ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.

12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e- mail delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original thereof.

14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.

16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.

17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.

18. No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

19. Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.

20. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.

21. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.

22. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.

CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.

The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.

Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
_____X______ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.

Construction T&C
Negotiated Ts & Cs for Blackburn Consulting, REV 1/25/23 MC

6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 1000012307
00848551
N/A
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

ATTACHMENT A

HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):

Construction:_X___
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:_X__
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Cyber Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
7 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:____
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.

How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX.

Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.

Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202

8 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Asbestos-Containing Materials in City-Owned Buildings
California Health and Safety Code Section 25915 requires that all City of Roseville employees, contractors and lessees be notified annually of the presence of asbestos in City-owned buildings constructed prior to 1979. Please post this notice in an area(s) accessible to all employees, contractors and lessees. Contact Facility Maintenance & Operations at (916) 774-5740 for more information about Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) in specific City-owned buildings. For more information about asbestos refer to the OSHA website.

The City of Roseville is committed to maintaining a safe and healthy work environment. The City' s Facility Maintenance & Operations staff conducts ongoing inspections to identify and safely manage previously installed asbestos-containing products. Renovation of City-owned buildings MUST be reviewed in advance by Facility Maintenance & Operations to ensure the City is in compliance with building codes, Americans with Disabilities Act and that no ACMs are disturbed without proper safeguards. Work that requires removal or repair of ACMs is restricted to trained and qualified persons only. Facility Maintenance & Operations will need to approve the qualified contractors.

Use the following measures to protect you and others from exposure to airborne asbestos:
● Presume all building materials contain asbestos until determined otherwise by Facility Maintenance & Operations.
● Do not install walls, closets, cabinets, ceilings.
● Do not remove, cut, drill, sand, grind or otherwise disturb any material in the buildings, including carpet and tile.
● Do not paint (this includes any walls, ceilings, floors and electrostatic painting of office furniture).
● Do not remove any items nailed or screwed to the walls (this includes pictures, cabinets, electrical, etc.).
● Do not go above ceilings, behind walls or into building spaces such as attics and crawlspaces unless these areas have been inspected and cleared by Facility Maintenance & Operations.
● Do not pull cable or wiring through above-ceiling spaces with asbestos. ● Do not install screws, pins, nails or hangers into asbestos ceiling or wall plaster. ● Be careful not to damage walls, ceilings or floors when moving furniture or equipment. It is recommended that Facility Maintenance & Operations be contacted prior to moving furniture or equipment.
● Do not brush, sweep or vacuum textured asbestos ceiling plaster or plaster debris. ● Immediately report any damage or deterioration of suspect building materials to Facility Maintenance & Operations or Risk Management.

It is important to note that the presence of asbestos does not mean you have been exposed.

Exposure results when friable asbestos particles are inhaled or ingested. Asbestos becomes friable when material containing asbestos is drilled, sanded or disturbed by remodeling or demolition work or when the ACM has deteriorated. Intact, bonded, sealed or undisturbed asbestos does not pose a hazard.

Employees may review the asbestos survey reports, results of bulk sampling or air monitoring conducted in City-owned buildings. All asbestos data will be available by appointment with Facility Maintenance & Operations.
9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Sign to acknowledge receipt of asbestos notification:

Asbestos
Rev 01/16/19

10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 2/7/2023
Blackburn Consulting
Contract Purchase Agreement 3002715

Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 2/7/2023
Vice President
Wendy Supinger
CFO
Wendy Supinger
2/7/2023
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4749B558-6FCA-43A5-91D4-B595639FE9FA

April, 2022

RE: Contractor and Grantee Compliance with Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Actions in Ukraine

Dear Vendor:

On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (EO) regarding sanctions in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine. The EO is located at https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22-Russia-Ukraine-Executive- Order.pdf.

The EO directs all agencies and departments that are subject to the Governor’s authority to take certain immediate steps, including notifying all contractors and grantees of their obligations to comply with existing economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law.

This correspondence serves as a notice under the EO that as a contractor or grantee, compliance with the economic sanctions imposed in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine is required, including with respect to, but not limited to, the federal executive orders identified in the EO and the sanctions identified on the U.S. Department of the Treasury website (https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/sanctions- programs-and-country-information/ukraine-russia-related-sanctions). Failure to comply may result in the termination of contracts or grants, as applicable.

Please note that for any agreements or grants valued at $5 million or more you must report to the City of Roseville your compliance with economic sanctions including steps you have taken in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, including, but not limited to, desisting from making new investments in, or engaging in financial transactions with, Russian entities, not transferring technology to Russia or Russian entities, and directly providing support to the government and people of Ukraine.

Sincerely,

4/25/2022

Shannon Wiest
City of Roseville
Purchasing and Warehouse Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2A1D2EAC-0CBD-4B5E-BF62-B1E021C1FB68 DocuSign Envelope ID: 289492D2-A3E5-41A1-BDA9-8C5AB857D090 DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 Geotechnical | Geo-Environmental | Construction Services | Forensics Proposal to the City of Roseville
Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department Special Inspections and
Materials Testing Services
RFP #01-063
November 2022
2491 Boatman Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Maidu Park Bike Trail Reconstruction
Audrey Huisking Park Nicole Gee Drive
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

West Sacramento Office:
2491 Boatman Ave
West Sacramento, CA 95691 Auburn (530) 887-1494 (916) 375-8706 Fresno (559) 438-8411

West Sacramento Office:
2491 Boatman Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691 Auburn (530) 887-1494 (916) 375-8706 Fresno (559) 438-8411 November 9, 2022
City of Roseville
Attn: City Clerk Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Subject: 5.1 COVER LETTER
Proposal for Special Inspections and Materials Testing Services, RFP 01-063 Roseville Public Works Department – Facility Services Division Dear Selection Team,
The City of Roseville (City) seeks a qualified firm that specializes in special inspection and materials testing services to assist the City in the successful completion of a variety of projects including new capital improvement projects to the rehabilitation of City maintained facilities. These projects will enhance the overall quality of life of the community by improving physical structures and facilities that provide services. Blackburn Consulting (Blackburn) is excited for the opportunity to be a part of those projects.

For over 14 years, Blackburn has provided geotechnical, geo-environmental, materials testing, and inspection services to multiple City departments. We are excited to continue these services for the Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department. Our strengths for this contact include the following:
■ Blackburn’s Current Roseville On-Call Contract: We currently perform special inspection and materials testing for the City and know your processes and expectations. Blackburn has demonstrated responsiveness, flexibility in scheduling, and quality services on our past contracts with the City. ■ Blackburn’s Relationship with Roseville Staff: We have developed solid relationships with many City staff members through our many years of working together.
■ Blackburn’s Home Office Locations: Our West Sacramento and Auburn offices are about 25 minutes from the City’s office, which promotes fast response.
■ Blackburn’s Invoicing Procedures: We have developed invoicing procedures in conjunction with the City that are prompt, accurate, and easy to understand.

Firm Headquarters Address: 11521 Blocker Drive, Suite 110, Auburn, CA 95603 Contact Person
Bryce Moore, Director of Construction Services
O: (916) 375-8706, M: (916) 833-9688, F: (916) 375-8709, [email protected] Blackburn will perform the services and adhere to the requirements described in this RFP .

5.2 SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS : We provide a copy of the Proposer's Certification (Attachment B) in Section G. The Certification is signed by Robert Lokteff, PE, GE. Robert is authorized to sign for Blackburn Consulting.

Please call if you have any questions. We look forward to a continued successful partnership with the City.

Sincerely,

BLACKBURN CONSULTING
Robert Lokteff, PE, GE Bryce Moore
Principal, Vice President Director of Construction Services DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.3 TAB A: FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 4
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.3 TAB A: FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS
Firm Profile
Blackburn Consulting formed in 1998 with a commitment to excellence.

Blackburn provides geotechnical, geological, geo-environmental, materials testing, construction inspection, and laboratory testing services for public works projects. We have a strong reputation for quality because we take the time to do things right. We are careful and thoughtful, which results in economical, technically accurate recommendations and designs, and lower long-term lifecycle costs.

On-Call Contract Qualifications
Blackburn has a proven track record providing on-call materials testing and geotechnical services for public agencies. We currently provide on- call materials testing for the following agencies:
■ Caltrans Districts 2, 3, 6, 9 ■ Placer County Water Agency ■ City of West Sacramento ■ City of Roseville
■ City of Davis ■ Nevada County
We are familiar with the demands and fluctuations of an on-call contract. We know the importance of quick response time, clear communication, consistent work quality, and flexibility when it comes to meeting agency staffing needs. Our company is small, nimble, experienced, and professional. These qualities make us uniquely qualified to serve on-call contracts well. We include client references in the following sections who can speak to our commitment to quality service and ability to manage projects efficiently.

Firm Size and Organizational Structure
Blackburn has a relatively flat organizational structure. Our Board of Directors provides vision and oversight for our three offices, all located within northern and central California. Blackburn has maintained a staff of 45-53 employees over the last five years.

Firm Information

OFFICE LOCATIONS
West Sacramento
2491 Boatman Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
Phone: (916) 375-8706
Fax: (916) 375-8709
Auburn
11521 Blocker Dr, Ste 110
Auburn, CA 95603
Phone: (530) 887-1494
Fax: (530) 887-1495
Fresno
4186 W . Swift Ave, Ste 107
Fresno, CA 93722
Phone: (559) 438-8411

ORGANIZATION DETAILS
S-Corporation
Certified Small Business #18473
DUN#145481953
Federal Tax ID #68-0419662
DIR #1000012307
Blackburn
Board of Directors
Engineering
Forensics
Geo-Environmental
Construction
Inspection
Engineering
Forensics
Geo-Environmental
Materials Testing
Special Inspection
Construction
Inspection
Auburn
Engineering
Forensics
Geo-Environmental
Materials Testing
Special Inspection
West Sacramento Fresno
Materials Lab
Caltrans, AASHTO, AMRL, CCRL, USACE, and DSA
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 5
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Services
For this contract, Blackburn will be the prime consultant and provide special inspection and materials testing services.

Materials Testing / Special Inspection Qualifications
Blackburn provides Quality Assurance materials testing and special inspection during construction on a wide variety of projects including roadways, bridges, parks, pipelines, water/ wastewater plants, levees, dams, and schools. Blackburn’s material testers have:
■ Specialized training and education for various construction procedures and techniques ■ Extensive experience in public works construction
■ Training in standard practices for testing and quality assurance ■ Experience with City of Roseville Design & Construction Standards, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications, and California Building Codes (CBC) Our materials testers and special inspectors maintain certifications including ICC, ACI, Caltrans, DSA, ACIA, CASI, and OSHA. Our staff have extensive knowledge of construction project requirements built from years of construction materials testing and inspection experience.

We are committed to vigilant management of construction activities so we can identify and resolve issues before they cause delays and/or extra costs. We are careful, strategic, and committed to quality. We know it’s crucial to maintain upfront, clear, and consistent communication with the City, Contractor, project stakeholders, and subconsultants, which results in higher quality and lower costs.

Laboratory Testing Qualifications
Our laboratory performs tests on soil, rock, soil amendment mixtures, HMA, concrete, and aggregates.

In-house laboratory services allow us to maintain close control of testing and turn-around times. All laboratory data and reports are reviewed by a registered engineer for quality and accuracy. Our laboratory maintains accreditation from:
■ The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ■ The Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL)
■ The AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL)
■ The US Army Corp of Engineers (USACE)
■ The California Division of the State Architect (DSA)
Our in-house QA program requires independent assurance testing and includes procedures for technician certification, test control data, diagnostic and corrective action, performance procedures, equipment inventory, and equipment calibration information. Blackburn’s lab will maintain our lab accreditations for the life of this contract.

Subconsultant
MID PACIFIC ENGINEERING (MPE) - MPE will assist Blackburn with structural steel welding inspections when required. MPE is a professional consulting firm dedicated to providing high quality services to private and public clients throughout Northern California. MPE has successfully supported Blackburn on multiple important projects. DIR #1000001317

5.3 TAB A: FIRM'S QUALIFICATIONS CONT'D
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.4 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 7
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
Blackburn has provided materials testing and inspection services through multiple contracts for the City of Lincoln. Projects from our latest contract include:
■ Catte Verdera Tank # 3: Concrete sampling, welding inspection, mass grading, masonry, access road paving, and welding inspection. ■ East Side Water and Sewer Replacement: Compaction testing of subgrade and aggregate base, FDR-C, underground sewer and water, and hot mix asphalt.
■ McBean Pool Site: Compaction testing of subgrade and aggregate base for the swimming pool bleacher pad. Concrete sampling of sidewalk and bleacher slabs.

Blackburn also provided geotechnical recommendations as needed to support construction of each project.

City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
Blackburn provided special inspection, construction inspection, and materials testing services through multiple contracts. Projects included:
■ The Cannery: 100-plus acre site, which includes mixed-density housing, commercial space, open space, on-site drainage facilities, and a storm drain pump station. Blackburn performed special inspection and materials testing during construction for site infrastructure including utilities, streets, storm drain basin, pump station, surface improvements, frontage improvements, and park development.
■ Veterans Memorial Center Renovation: Observed concrete placement, wedge anchor installation, and rebar inspection
■ Davis Community Pool Upgrades: Compaction and footing observation. ■ Third Street Facilities: Inspection and materials testing of bicycle and pedestrian safety/access improvements, upgrades infrastructure to support current and planned mixed use infill and improves storm water drainage to reduce localized flooding while employing best storm water quality management practices.

Project Information
Client
City of Lincoln
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Contact
Araceli Cazarez
Associate Civil Engineer
(916) 434-2486
Project Dates
03/2019 to Ongoing
Contract / Actual
$340K / $275K to date
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Subconsultant
Mid Pacific Engineering

5.4 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
Project Information
Client
City of Davis
1717 5th Street
Davis, CA 95616
Contact
Michael Mitchell
Principal Civil Engineer
(530) 757-5686
Project Dates
Current Contract
09/2020 - Ongoing
Contract / Actual
$194,632 / ~$78 to date
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Managers
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 8
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) On-Call Geotech
Consulting, Inspection, and Materials Testing
In 2004, Blackburn partnered with PCWA to assist them with geotechnical consulting, materials testing, and inspection services throughout Placer County from Roseville to Truckee. The projects from our 2018-2020 on-call geotechnical and materials testing contract included water main installations, construction of new pump and tank facilities, structures, and facilitation of the meter replacement program.

Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services
■ Nevada Street Ped Bike Facilities
■ 12 Bridges Metering Station
■ Nevada Street Waterline Improvements
■ Interbay Dam Shotcrete
Placer Union High School District (PUHSD) Projects
For over 17 years, Blackburn has provided geotechnical, geo-environmental, materials testing, and inspection services for the Placer Union High School District (PUHSD). Our recent contracts with PUHSD include:

PUHSD On-Call
■ Del Oro HS Plant Crafted Buildings and Site Work: Compaction testing of building pads and subgrade/aggregate base for flatwork, concrete paving, parking lots, asphalt concrete, and trench backfill. Special inspection of foundation elements.
■ Earl Crabbe Gym: Compaction testing of sidewalk subgrade, aggregate base, and trench backfill. Inspection of footing excavations. Lab testing of native soils and aggregate base.

Project Dates: 02/2021 - Ongoing, Contract/Billed: $199K / $135K Placer High School Learning Commons
Compaction testing of pier foundation demolition backfill, building pad over excavation and backfill, slab on grade aggregate base, retaining wall backfill, sitework subgrade and aggregate base for sidewalks, concrete paving, parking lots, Hot Mix asphalt and storm drain, sewer, water, fire water, and dry utilities. Special inspection of structural steel material identification and reinforcing steel.

Project Dates: 02/2021 - 09/2022, Contract/Billed: $129K / $129K Project Information
Client
Placer County Water Agency
Contact
Aaron Sullivan
Engineering Services Manager
(530) 823-4886
Project Dates
05/2018 - 12/2020
Contract / Actual
$151,539 / $132,851
Key Staff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Materials Testers - Inspectors
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Subconsultant
Mid Pacific Engineering
Project Information
Client
Placer Union High School
District
13101 Bill Francis Drive
Auburn, CA 95603
Contact
Jeff Patton
Director of Maintenance,
Operations and Facilities
(530) 886-4400
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado

5.4 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES CONT'D
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 9
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.4 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES CONT'D
Caltrans On-Call Roadway Construction Services
Blackburn Consulting has a long history providing materials testing and inspection services throughout California. Blackburn personnel perform quality assurance construction inspection of roadway construction, batch plants, paving, striping, retaining walls, and utilities, and materials testing of concrete, soil, aggregate base, structure backfill, and Hot Mix Asphalt and RHMA.

Caltrans District 3, Sacramento, El Dorado, Placer, Yolo, Sutter, Colusa, Glenn, Butte, Yuba, Nevada, and Sierra County
For the last 12 years, Blackburn has provided on-
call construction services to Caltrans District 3
under contracts 03A3209, 03A2437, 03A1075, and
03A1811. These Contracts required professional
and technical construction engineering and
materials testing services on an as-needed basis
in support of construction of state highways,
interchanges, and bridges. Projects include:
■ I-5 Improvements
■ Hwy 65 Lincoln Bypass
■ Hwy 80 Newcastle Road Bridge Raise
Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
The Twelve Bridges High School project improvements included:
■ Administration, science, student center and classroom buildings ■ Stadium including bleachers and sports light towers
■ Sports fields (soccer, softball, and baseball)
■ Hot mix asphalt and concrete pavement improvements
■ Exterior concrete flatwork
■ Underground utilities
■ Shallow detention basin
Materials Testing and Inspection Services: Blackburn performed site grading observation, concrete sampling, slump tests and compressive strength tests, concrete batch plant sampling, compaction testing of aggregate base prior to paving, utility trench backfill observation and testing, special inspection of structural steel, masonry, post-installed and wedge anchors, fire proofing, and high-strength bolts
Project Information
Client
Caltrans District 3
703 B Street
Marysville, CA 95901
Contact
Gina Reiland
Contract Manager
(530) 741-4177
Project Dates
04/2020 to Ongoing
Contract / Actual
$9M / ~$6.1 M to date
Key Staff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Materials Testers
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Dustan Kliethermes
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Project Information
Client
Western Placer Unified School
District
600 Sixth Street, Suite 400
Lincoln, CA 95648
Contact
Michael Adell
Director of Facilities
(916) 645-5100
Project Dates
06/2004 - 07/2021
Contract / Actual
$877,427 / $877,427
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Materials Testers
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Subconsultant
Mid Pacific Engineering
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 10
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Project Information
Contact
Cathy Gosalvez
Public Works
Assistant Engineer
(916) 746-1300
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Subconsultant
Mid Pacific Engineering
Project Information
Contact
Orville Chatterton
Development Services
Construction Inspection
Supervisor
(916) 774-5576
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado

5.4 TAB B: EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES CONT'D
We are proud of our services we have provided to the City and encourage the City to speak with City staff who can attest to our quick response and reliability.

City of Roseville Public Works Department
Blackburn began providing materials testing for the Public Works Department in 2016. Recent contracts include:
2018 On-Call Materials Testing Services
■ Maidu Park Bike Trail Reconstruction
Phase 1 and 2
■ Sierra Gardens Transfer Point
■ Fire Station No. 8
These projects included full depth reclamation of existing pavement, subgrade preparation, and aggregate base, hot mix asphalt and concrete testing.

Blackburn sampled and tested concrete and hot mix asphalt for conformance with project specifications and Caltrans standards.

Blackburn also provided Geotechnical recommendations for unstable subgrade in existing roadway areas, foundation stability for City owned structures, and pavement design review and analysis.

City of Roseville Development Services Department
Blackburn provided testing for underground installation of sanitary sewer, storm drain, domestic water, reclaimed water, drainage facilities and joint utilities, and new roadways.

Blackburn provided compaction testing of HMA and AB, lime, cement and FDR treatment observation for roadway, proof roll observation of subgrade, and special inspection of drainage structures and sound walls. Projects include:
2022 On-Call Materials Testing Services
■ Sierra Vista 6B
■ Baseline and Watt Ave. Improvements
2019 On-Call Materials Testing Services
■ Market Street Segment 5
■ Hayden Parkway Bridge
■ Foothills Blvd. Emergency Repair
Shadowbrook Lift Station (2015-2018)
West Side Tank and Pump Station (2017)
City of Roseville Parks, Recreation, and Library Department Blackburn provided inspection, observation and testing of subgrade, concrete and reinforcing steel.
2022 On-Call Special Inspections and
Materials Testing Services
■ Audrey Huisking Park
■ NC57 Dog Park
■ Mahaney Sports Park
Project Information
Contact
Ken Peterson
Parks, Recreation & Library
Park Development Project
Manager
(916) 746-1233
Key Staff
Principal
Robert Lokteff
Project Manager
Bryce Moore
Testers/Inspectors
Ernest Garcia
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 12
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Staffing Plan
Robert Lokteff, PE, GE will serve as Principal-in-Charge for this contract and will provide oversight. Bryce Moore will serve as the Project Manager and work directly with City representatives to develop scopes and fees for special inspection and materials testing projects and schedule testers/inspectors.

Organization Chart

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM
Blackburn Materials Lab
Caltrans, AASHTO, AMRL,
CCRL, USACE, and DSA
Robert Lokteff, PE, GE
Principal-in-Charge
Bryce Moore
Project Manager
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Materials Testers/Inspectors

SUBCONSULTANTS
Welding Inspections
Mid Pacific Engineering
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 13
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM CONT'D
Robert Lokteff, PE, GE, Principal-in-Charge
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Sacramento
Mr. Lokteff is a Principal Geotechnical Engineer with Blackburn Consulting.

He has over 33 years of geotechnical engineering experience in California.

Projects have included roadway widening and rehabilitation, Caltrans highways and bridges, pipelines, master-planned communities, schools, heavily loaded buildings, soil stabilization, geologic hazards, and landslide analysis/mitigation. Mr. Lokteff specializes in pavement design, deep and shallow foundation design, levee engineering, forensic engineering, and value engineering including the determination of cost-effective pavement rehabilitation alternatives. Relevant Experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Caltrans District 3 On-Call
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Bryce Moore, Project Manager,
Director of Construction Services
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Roseville
Bryce Moore serves as Blackburn Consulting's Director of Construction Services and has been with the company for 15 years. Bryce graduated from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA with a bachelor’s degree in Agriculture Business. Bryce’s experience of over 21 years includes management, inspection, and materials management and testing for city and county roadways, public works infrastructure, Caltrans roadways and bridges, subdivisions, schools, levees, and pipeline projects. Bryce has provided inspection and certified testing of concrete, soils, and asphalt. He is Caltrans, ICC, and ACI certified. Relevant Experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Roseville Parks, Recreation, and Library On-Call Services ■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer County Water Agency On-Call
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Caltrans District 3 On-Call
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Robert's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
23 Years / 33 Years
Education
MS, Civil Engineering,
(Geotechnical Concentration),
California State University,
Sacramento
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
Registrations
Professional Engineer,
Civil, CA #59558
Professional Engineer,
Geotechnical, CA #2589
Bryce's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
16 Years / 21 Years
Education
BS, Ag. Business, California
Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, CA
UC Davis, Sacramento
Extension. Construction
Management Certificate
Certifications
Caltrans CTM: 105, 125AGG,
125GEN, 125HMA, 201, 231,
375, 504, 518, 521, 523.1,
539, 540, 541, 543, 556, 557
ACI Concrete Field Technician
Grade I, ICC Reinforced
Concrete Special Inspector
Nuclear Gauge Certified
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 14
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Emilio Chavez, Senior Materials Tester / Inspector
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Citrus Heights
Emilio Chavez is a highly qualified materials tester with over 27 years of experience throughout California. His expertise includes earthwork, concrete, and pavement testing and observation on project types such as roadways, bridges, airports, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, levees, schools, and buildings. Emilio has provided quality assurance testing on many large, successful projects and has worked with various cities, counties, and other agencies such as Caltrans. Relevant experience:
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Michael Chittenden, Materials Tester/Inspector
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Olivehurst
Mr. Chittenden is a Materials Tester/Inspector with Blackburn Consulting.

Michael provides inspection and certified testing of concrete, soils, and asphalt on various projects for cities, counties, and government agencies. He has inspected, sampled, and tested soil bentonite cutoff walls, concrete, and pavement. Michael has performed testing during mass grading, placement of engineered fill, street/parking lot subgrade and base-rock, and utility trench backfill. Relevant Experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Ernest Garcia, Materials Tester
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Roseville
Ernest Garcia serves as a lab and field technician with Blackburn Consulting.

He has a strong work ethic and a dedication to quality. Ernest understands the importance of communication and detailed work. He strives to provide excellent service for Blackburn Consulting and its clients. ■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Roseville Parks, Recreation, and Library On-Call Services ■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM CONT'D
Emilio's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
7 Years / 27 Years
Education
Cal Poly State University, San
Luis Obispo, Architecture /
Architectural Engineering
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP HMA I, HMA II,
Soil & Aggregates, PCC, CTM
125 CEM, 125 GEN, 231, 375,
521, 533, ACI Concrete Field
Technician Grade I, Nuclear
Gauge Certified
Michael's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
7 Years / 10 Years
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP HMA I, HMA II,
Soil &Agg, PCC, CTM 125Gen,
231, 375, ACI Concrete Field
Technician Grade I, Nuclear
Gauge Certified
Ernest's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
2 Years / 7 Years
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP Soil & Agg, PCC,
CTM 105, 125 AGG, 231, 375,
ACI Concrete Field Technician
Grade I, Nuclear Gauge
Certified
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 15
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM CONT'D
Jacob Gregory, Materials Tester/Inspector
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Olivehurst
Jacob Gregory has 8 years of experience in the materials testing and construction inspection field. His background includes Caltrans, roadways, dams, levees, light rail, pipelines, and airports. Jacob has provided construction inspections and certified testing of concrete, soils, hot mix asphalt, reinforcing steel, and prestressed concrete. Relevant Experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer County Water Agency On-Call
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Dustan Kliethermes, Materials Tester
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Olivehurst
Mr. Kliethermes serves as a lab and field technician with Blackburn Consulting.

He has a strong work ethic and a dedication to quality. Dustan understands the importance of communication and detailed work. He strives to provide excellent service for Blackburn Consulting and its clients. Relevant Experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Bismarck Maddy, Special Inspector/Materials Tester
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Elk Grove
Bismarck Maddy has 24 years of experience as a Construction Inspector, Special Inspector, and Materials Tester of public works, capital improvement ,and residential/commercial development projects. He has a reputation for achieving goals using proven analytical skills and exceptional judgment with a thorough understanding of safety standards and methods, ability to read and interpret plans and technical construction drawings. He is also experienced in review of inspection data and application of Total Quality Management techniques in all areas of construction inspection. Relevant experience:
■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Placer County Water Agency On-Call
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Jacob's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
4 Years / 8 Years
Certifications
Caltrans CTM: 231, 375, 504,
518, 539, 540, 543, 556, 557
ACI Concrete Field Technician
Grade I, Nuclear Gauge
Certified
Dustan's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
5 years / 5 years
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP HMA I, HMA II,
and Soil and Aggregates, PCC.

ACI Concrete Field Technician
Grade I, Nuclear Gauge
Certified
Bismarck's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
8 years / 24 years
Certifications
Caltrans Test Methods 504,
518, 539, 540, 543, 556, 557,
ACI Concrete Field Tech
Nuclear Gauge Certified,
ICC: Structural Steel and
Welding, Reinforced Concrete,
and Structural Masonry
Special Inspector
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 16
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
Eric Quintana, Materials Tester
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: Yuba City
Eric Quintana serves as a lab and field technician with Blackburn Consulting.

He has a strong work ethic and a dedication to quality. Eric understands the importance of communication and detailed work. He strives to provide excellent service for Blackburn Consulting and its clients. ■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Jesus Tostado, Materials Tester
Home Office: West Sacramento. Hometown: West Sacramento Jesus Tostado serves as a laboratory technician with Blackburn Consulting.

He has a strong work ethic and a dedication to quality. Jesus understands the importance of communication and detailed work. He strives to provide excellent service for Blackburn Consulting and its clients. ■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer County Water Agency On-Call
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Sergio Tostado, PE, Senior Materials Tester/Inspector
Home Office: West Sacramento, Hometown: West Sacramento Sergio Tostado is an experienced, conscientious, and hard-working field technician. He has 14 years' experience in the materials testing/construction inspection field. Sergio has performed quality assurance materials testing in support of a variety of different public works projects, capital improvement programs, and development projects. He is well-versed in all aspects of construction materials testing including soils, concrete, and asphalt. He also has laboratory analysis experience including soils, concrete, and hot mix asphalt in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). ■ City of Roseville Public Works On-Call Services
■ City of Roseville On-Call for Development Services
■ City of Lincoln On-Call Engineering Services
■ City of Davis On-Call Professional Services
■ Placer Union High School District Projects
■ Twelve Bridges High School Site Development
Eric's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
2 years / 7 years
Certifications
Caltrans CTM 125 AGG, 125
GEN, 125 HMA, 231, 375, ACI
Concrete Field Tech, Nuclear
Gauge Certified

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM CONT'D
Jesus' Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
5 years / 5 years
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP HMA I, HMA II,
and Soil and Aggregates
ACI Concrete Field Tech,
Nuclear Gauge Certified
Sergio's Details
Blackburn/Overall Experience
10 years / 15 years
Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
California State University,
Sacramento
MS, Geotechnical
Engineering, California State
University, Sacramento
Registrations
Professional Engineer,
Civil, CA #89375
Certifications
Caltrans JTCP HMA I, HMA II,
Soil & Aggregates, PCC. CTM
231, 375, 533, ACI Concrete
Field Technician Grade I,
Nuclear Gauge Certified
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 17
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.5 TAB C: QUALIFICATIONS OF TEAM CONT'D
Subconsultant
Curtis Elliot, Field Technician/CWI
Home Office: West Sacramento, CA
Mr. Elliott has been in the Welding industry since 2017 after obtaining an Associate Degree in the Welding Technology Program at Sierra College in June of 2018. He has been involved in many phases of construction testing on a wide range of projects including residential, commercial and DSA school projects.
■ Green Acres, Roseville
■ West Side Tanks & Pumps Station, Roseville
■ Blue Oaks Plaza at Fiddyment Ranch, Roseville
■ Metro Air Park, Sacramento
■ Calvary Cemetery Administration Center, Citrus Heights Curtis' Details
MPE/Overall Experience
2 Years / 5 Years
Education
Sierra College, Welding
Technology Program
Certifications
International Code Council
(ICC) – No. 9347621
Structural Steel and Bolting
Special Inspector
Structural Masonry Special
Inspector
Soils Special Inspector
Reinforced Concrete Special
Inspector Associate
Spray Applied Fire Proofing
Special Inspector
Structural Welding Special
Inspector
Prestressed Concrete Special
Inspector
Master of Special Inspection
American Welding Society
(AWS) QC1 Certified Welding
Inspector – No. 20010311
Certified Nuclear Soil Gauge
Operator
Key Staff
Experience
Robert Lokteff
Bryce Moore
Emilio Chavez
Michael Chittenden
Ernest Garcia
Jacob Gregory
Dustan Kliethermes
Bismarck Maddy
Eric Quintana
Jesus Tostado
Sergio Tostado
Curtis Elliot
Years with Firm 24 16 7 7 2 4 5 8 2 5 10 2
Years' Experience 33 21 27 10 7 8 5 24 7 5 15 5
Capital Improvement Projects X X X X X X X X X X X X
Facilities X X X X X X X X X X
City of Roseville Projects X X X X X X X X X X X X
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.6 TAB D: SERVICES
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 19
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
The City plans to select one or more firms that specialize in special inspections and material testing for roadway and related construction. The primary types of materials inspected and tested will include, asphalt concrete, Portland cement concrete, rebar, steel, and local soils. The types of projects will vary from new capital improvement projects to the rehabilitation of City maintained facilities.

Blackburn will provide the following tests and inspection services:
■ Provide certified field representative and perform laboratory testing in our AASHTO and Caltrans- approved lab.
■ Prepare project specific materials sampling, acceptance, and testing plans if requested. ■ Provide sampling and acceptance testing in accordance with project specifications, the City's Design & Construction Standards, and Caltrans Standard Specifications. ■ Maintain a summary log of acceptance testing and monitor that the frequency of testing is within the minimum frequencies specified in the City’s Quality Assurance Plan (QAP).

Earthwork
■ Monitor, sample, and perform compaction testing of trench backfill, structure backfill, embankment, grading, and sidewalk and roadway subgrade and aggregate base. ■ Sample and test roadway materials for materials acceptance in accordance with frequencies of testing established in City QAP , City Standard Specifications, and/or Caltrans Construction Manual. - Structure Backfill, Pervious Backfill, Embankments, Borrow – Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, Maximum Wet Density, Relative Compaction, and R-Value.
- Stabilized Soils: Unconfined Compressive Strength, Optimum Moisture Content, Application Rate, Uniformity of Stabilized Soil, Sieve Analysis, Relative Compaction, Maximum Wet Density. - Subgrade and Aggregate Base – Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, R-Value, Relative Compaction, Maximum Wet Density, and Durability.
- Reclaimed Pavements: Relative Compaction, Sieve Analysis and Cement Application Rate.

Concrete Structures and Pavement
■ Sample and test freshly mixed concrete for slump/penetration, unit weight, air content, temperature, and cast compressive strength cylinders or flexural beams as requested. ■ Perform preplacement inspection of reinforcing steel and form work Seal Coats and Asphalt Concrete
■ Sample and test Asphalt Concrete and Seal Coats during production as determined by the City Inspector. - Periodic temperature checks and monitor overall paving operation. - Nuclear density testing to confirm in-place density with contractor QC. - Sample HMA for maximum theoretical density determination. - Perform coring of asphalt concrete for pavement density of cores if not performed by contractor quality control.

Treated Soil and Reclaimed Pavements
■ Mix design review and verification.
■ Nuclear density testing of treated soils.
■ Application rate verification of cement, lime, or other stabilizers.

5.6 TAB D: SERVICES
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 20
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.6 TAB D: SERVICES CONT'D
Treated Soil and Reclaimed Pavements Cont'd
■ Treatment depth verification, including using phenolphthalein spray (pH color indicator) to verify that cement or lime stabilization agents are mixed to the full treatment depth. ■ For full-depth reclamation with cement:
- Verification of minimum and maximum strengths (treated remolded unconfined compressive strength tests).
- Verification of microcracking.
■ Geotechnical construction support as necessary to assist the City with resolving potential treated soil and reclaimed pavement construction issues.

Special Inspection
■ Inspect CMU block placement, reinforcing steel, and sample and test masonry products such as mortar, grout, and block.
■ Inspect reinforcing steel.
■ Post-installed anchor inspection and pull testing if required. ■ High-Strength Bolt inspection.
■ Torque testing of Proto II soundwall tension bolts.
■ Welding inspection of structural steel elements (Mid Pacific Engineering).

Deliverables
Blackburn will prepare and submit:
■ Daily Field Reports,
■ Test Location Maps,
■ Laboratory Test Reports,
■ Special Inspection Reports,
■ Summary Reports, and
■ Staff and Lab Certifications/Approvals to the City documenting our qualifications.

Field and laboratory reports will be reviewed by Blackburn’s Project Manager prior to submittal to the City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.7 TAB E: COST PROPOSAL
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 22
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.7 TAB E: COST PROPOSAL
Auburn Main Office: Fresno Office:
11521 Blocker Drive, Suite 110 4186 W. Swift Avenue, Suite 107 Auburn, CA 95603 Fresno, CA 93722
(530) 887-1494, Fax (530) 887-1495 (559) 438-8411, Alt. (559) 276-4246 West Sacramento Office:
2491 Boatman Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 375-8706, Fax (916) 375-8709
PROFESSIONAL HOURLY RATES:

Senior Project Manager $242 Construction Manager $198
Principal $276 Clerical $110
SPECIAL INSPECTION PERSONNEL HOURLY RATES:

Prevailing Wage
Regular Saturday/OT
Special Inspector/Group 2 $201 $233 $265
Special Inspector/Group 2 (2nd shift) $216 $251 $287
Materials Tester/Group 3 $183 $210 $239
Materials Tester/Group 3 (2nd shift) $196 $226 $256
Non-Prevailing Wage
Regular Saturday/OT
Special Inspector $158 $188 $219
Materials Tester/Group 3 $133 $163 $194
MINIMUM BASIC CHARGES:

Overtime
EQUIPMENT: (personnel not included)
Hand Sampling Equipment $312 / Day
Nuclear Moisture/Density Testing $20 / Test
$54/ Test
$218 / Test
Coring Bit Charge $54 / Core
Coring Machine $301 / Day
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer $312 / Day Torque Wrench
Electrical Resistivity Equipment $285 / Day
Generator $84 / Day MASW Survey Equipment
$78 / Day Traffic Control/Safety
$725 / Day Concrete Vapor Emission Test Kit
pH Test Strip Package $67 / Ea
Groundwater Level Indicator
Inclinometer Survey Equipment
Rock Point Load Test Equipment
Seismic Refraction:12 Channel
Roto Hammer
Schmidt Hammer
12" Sand Cone Testing
Report Copies
Sunday/Holiday/2x
Sunday/Holiday/2x
6" Sand Cone Testing
Outside Equipment & Services Cost plus 15%
Double Ring Infiltrometer Equipment
Pachometer
Level Survey Equipment
4 Report copies provided
2023 SCHEDULE OF FEES - City of Roseville On-Call
www.blackburnconsulting.com
Geotechnical  Geo-Environmental  Construction Services  Forensics Mileage IRS Rate
Technician Services Charge includes time from office and return to office, minimum charge - 2 hours
Before 7:00am or after 4:00pm
$345 / Day
$296 / Day
$151 / Day
$123 / Day
$84 / Day
$151 / Day
$45 / Ea
$345 / Day
$536 / Day
Revised 11/08/2022
$145 / Day
$536 / Day
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 23
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.7 TAB E: COST PROPOSAL CONT'D
Auburn Main Office: Fresno Office:
11521 Blocker Drive, Suite 110 4186 W. Swift Avenue, Suite 107 Auburn, CA 95603 Fresno, CA 93722
(530) 887-1494, Fax (530) 887-1495 (559) 438-8411, Alt. (559) 276-4246 West Sacramento Office:
2491 Boatman Avenue
West Sacramento, CA 95691
(916) 375-8706, Fax (916) 375-8709

SOIL CLASSIFICATION
#200 Sieve Wash Construction Manager $140
Sieve Analysis to #200 ASTM D6913, CAL 202 $216
Standard Hydrometer with Sieve Analysis ASTM D422 $424
Plasticity Index ASTM D4318 $307
Specific Gravity - Soils AASHTO T100 $134

MOISTURE / DENSITY
Moisture Content ASTM D2216, CAL 226 $51
Moisture/Density $95

SOIL COMPACTION
Standard Proctor (4" or 6" mold ) ASTM D698 $385
Modified Proctor (4" or 6" mold ) ASTM D1557 $385
California Impact CAL 216 $385
Check Point (Standard or Modified ) $178

VOLUME CHANGE
One-Dimensional Consolidation ASTM D2435 $608
(6 load increments, includes 2 time rate curves and 2 rebound decrements) Additional Load or Rebound Decrement $43/ea
Additional Time Rate Curves $132/ea
Expansion Index ASTM D4829 $307
One-Dimensional Settlement Swell ASTM D4546 $273

STRENGTH
Unconfined Compression ASTM D2166 $178
Compression, Rock Prep & Photos included ASTM D7012 $207 Rock Point Load (up to six points) ASTM D5731 $84
California Bearing Ratio (CBR), with curve ASTM D1883 $948 California Bearing Ratio (CBR), without curve ASTM D1883 $569 Resistance Value CAL 301, ASTM D2844 $418
Direct Shear: (per point)
Undisturbed ASTM D3080 $240
Remolded ASTM D3080 $307
Triaxial Compression: (per point) Photos of failure upon request Undrained, Unconsolidated w/out Pore Pressure ASTM D2850 $218 Consolidated, Undrained w/ Pore Pressure Measurements ASTM D4767 $630 Consolidated, Drained $903
Consolidated, Undrained, no Pore Pressure Measurements $356 Specimen Remolding $140
* Client requests for rush testing require pre-approval and 20% surcharge.

Blackburn Consulting Revised 11/08/2022
2023 SCHEDULE OF FEES - City of Roseville On-Call
Geotechnical  Geo-Environmental  Construction Services  Forensics www.blackburnconsulting.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 24
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.7 TAB E: COST PROPOSAL CONT'D
2023 Laboratory Fee Schedule Page 2 of 2

CORROSIVITY ANALYSIS
Corrosion Analysis Package CAL 643, 417, 422 $391
Includes Soil Resistivity, Soil pH, Sulfates / Chlorides. Minimum size is 1,000 grams pH CTM643 $51
Resistivity CTM643 $164

PERMEABILITY
Flex-wall Permeability ASTM D5084
Either Constant head or Falling Head / rising Tail Water. Method depends on soil type $558 Each Additional Effective Stress $140
Specimen Remodeling $138

TREATED SOIL TESTS
% Lime for Stabilization - per point (%) ASTM D6276 $156 pH of Soil CTM643 $51
Modified Proctor ASTM D1557 $458
Unconfined Compression Test ASTM D5102 $256
One Dimensional Swell ASTM D4546 $256

AGGREGATES
Bulk Specific Gravity - Course & Fine Aggregate ASTM C127 & 128, CAL 206, 207 $134 Coarse Durability CAL 229 $229
Fine Durability CAL 229 $229
Sand Equivalent CAL 217, ASTM D2419 $160
Cleanness Value CAL 227 $216
Moisture Content CAL 226/370 $123
Percent of Crushed Particles (per size fraction) CAL 205 $201 Fine Aggregate Angularity AASHTO T304, Method A $201
Flat and Elongated Particles (per size) AASHTO D 4791 $201 Combined Grading 1" through no. 200 CAL 201/202 $215
Bin Grading (First 2 Bins) CAL 201/202 $215
Each Bin Thereafter $84
LP-9 (RAP) Burn LP-9, CT382 $134

ASPHALT
Bulk Specific Gravity - Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt CAL 308 $67 Theoretical Max Specific Gravity (Rice) CAL 309 $234
LTMD (Set of 5) CAL 375 $463
Binder Content
Ignition Oven Correction Factor CAL 382 $396
Ignition Oven CAL 382 $234
Solvent AASHTO T164 $296
Stability (Set of 3) CAL 366 $413
Void Content
With Stability and Rice CAL 367 $45

CONCRETE & MASONRY
Concrete Compression Test 6" x 12" or 4" x 8" ASTM C39 $45 Masonry or Grout Compression $65
Compression Test of Cored Concrete Spec. (per core) $145 Compression Test of Shotcrete Cores (per core) $183
Other Tests Quoted Upon Request
* Client requests for rush testing require pre-approval and 20% surcharge.

Blackburn Consulting Revised 11/08/2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 25
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.7 TAB E: COST PROPOSAL CONT'D
MID PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.

Blackburn Consulting/MPE – Prevailing Wage Schedule of Fees – Sacramento Office

LABOR Rate per Hour
Field Testing and Inspection Technician (Concrete) $130 Field Testing and Inspection Technician (Soils, Anchors and Miscellaneous Inspections) $140 Senior Field Testing and Inspection Technician (Welding, Bolting and Masonry) $150 Senior Field Testing and Inspection Technician (Non Destructive Testing) $160 Managing Technician $160
Laboratory Technician $115
Draftsperson $110
Staff Engineer/Geologist $155
Project Engineer/Geologist $175
Senior Engineer/Geologist $195
Principal Engineer $215

Overtime and Double Time (work beyond 8 hour days, weekends and Holidays) will be billed at a rate of 1.5 and 2 times the hourly ra te presented above, respectively. A 2-hour minimum charge will apply on all projects. A 4 -hour minimum charge will apply on Saturday and Sundays. An 8-hour minimum charge will apply on Holidays.

LABORATORY TESTING
Soil and Aggregate Rate per Test
Absorption of Sand or Gravel $75
Aggregate Unit Weight $70
Aggregate Crushed Particles $120
Atterberg Limits $195
California Impact Method 216 $270
Compaction Curve $275
Consolidation Test $650
Corrosion Testing $180
Direct Shear Test $175
Durability $205
Expansion Index $205
Grain Size Analysis - Total Sieve (200, Fine and Coarse) $270 Grain Size Analysis - Fine or Coarse Sieve $125
Grain Size Analysis - Soils Finer than No. 200 $115
Grain Size Analysis - Hydrometer $195
Moisture Content $45
Permeability $435
Resistance Value - Untreated $380
Resistance Value - Treated with Lime or Cement $435
Sand Equivalent $175
Specific Gravity $145
Triaxial Shear - Undisturbed $430
Triaxial Shear - Remolded $525
Unconfined Compression Test $140
Unit Weight and Moisture Content - Undisturbed Sample $50 Unit Weight and Moisture Content - Loose Sample $75
Concrete and Masonry
Compression Testing - Concrete 4x8 or 6x12 $35
Compression Testing - Grout, Mortar or CLSM $50
Compression Testing - Masonry Unit or Brick $70
Compression Testing - Masonry Prism $215
Compression Testing - Concrete Core Including Trimming $60 Compression Testing – Shotcrete Core $65
Compression Testing - Hold Sample $30
Flexural Strength – 6” x 6” concrete beam $145
Length Change of Hardened Concrete – Batching, Compression Testing & Shrinkage Measurement $1320 Length Change of Hardened Concrete – Shrinkage Measurement $460 Masonry Unit Linear Shrinkage, Absorption and Moisture $580 Splitting Tensile Test – 6: x 12: Cylinders $70
Trial Batch – Compression Testing set of 5 $695
Unit Weight of Hardened Concrete $65
Reinforcing and Structural Steel
Anchor Bolt or Prestressing Strand Tensile Strength $95 Fire Proofing Unit Weight $65
Machining of Special Fittings, Fixtures or Tensile Coupons – per hour $95 Rebar Tensile and Bend 1 - 7 bar $140
Rebar Tensile and Bend 8 - 14 bar $195
Structural Bolt Set Tensile and Hardness $405
Please contact our office for laboratory testing not listed on the this fee schedule Quote

MISCELLANEOUS
Mileage – Billed Portal to Portal $0.95/mile
Per Diem $210/day
Outside Services Cost +20%
Final Report of Inspection $400
Department of Industrial Relations Wage Reporting $175/month

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.8 TAB F: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/

DOCUMENTS
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 27
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.8 TAB F: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS

4.0 Assurance of Designated Project Team
Blackburn will not substitute designated members of the team without approval by the City staff in accordance with RFP Section 4.0.

9.4 Conflict of Interest
Blackburn represents that in accordance with RFP Section 9.4 we have no known conflicts of interest.

9.7 Indemnification & Insurance Requirements
Blackburn can comply with the indemnification and insurance requirements in the sample contract Section 9.7. We provide exceptions for the City's considerations in Tab H EXCEPTIONS.

9.23 Proprietary Information
Blackburn acknowledges that nothing contained in our proposal is proprietary as described in RFP Section 9.23.

Proof of Registration with California Secretary of State DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 28
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.8 TAB F: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS CONT'D

Attachment B
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION
I hereby propose to furnish the goods or services specified in the Request for Proposals (“RFP”). I agree that my proposal will remain firm for a period of up to ninety (90) days in order to allow the City of Roseville (“City”) adequate time to evaluate the qualifications submitted.

I have carefully examined the Request for Proposals and any other documents accompanying or made a part of this RFP. The information contained in this proposal is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and is signed under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. I further certify that I am duly authorized to submit this proposal on behalf of the firm as its authorized agent and that the firm is ready, willing and able to perform if awarded the contract.

I further certify that this proposal is made without prior understanding, agreement, connection, discussion, or conspiracy with any other person, firm or corporation submitting a proposal for the same product or service; that this proposal is fair and made without outside control, collusion, fraud or illegal action; that no officer, employee or agent of the City or any other proposer is financially interested in said proposal; that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer, employee or agent of the City in connection with the award or terms of the contract that will be executed as a result of this RFP; and that the undersigned executed this Proposer’s Certification with full knowledge and understanding of the matters therein contained and was duly authorized to do so.
_________________________________________________

NAME OF BUSINESS
_________________________________________________

SIGNATURE
_________________________________________________

NAME & TITLE, TYPED OR PRINTED
_________________________________________________

MAILING ADDRESS
_________________________________________________

TELEPHONE NUMBER
_________________________________________________
EMAIL
Type of Organization:
____ Sole Proprietorship ____ Corporation _____ State of Incorporation ____ Partnership ____ Limited Liability Company Robert Lokteff, PE, GE, Principal, #2589
Blackburn Consulting
2491 Boatman Avenue, West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-375-8706
[email protected]
X
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 29
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.8 TAB F: REQUIRED STATEMENTS/DOCUMENTS CONT'D

Attachment C

NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION TO BE EXECUTED BY

BIDDER AND SUBMITTED WITH BID
The undersigned declares:

I am the _________________ of ______________________, the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on _______________________ [date], at _____________________ [city], ________________ [state].
____________________________________
(Signature of Declarant)
Principal Blackburn Consulting
November 9, 2022 West Sacramento
California
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 30
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022
DIR Proof
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.9 TAB G: EXCEPTIONS
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 32
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.9 TAB G: EXCEPTIONS
Contract Review/Exceptions
We have reviewed the City's Contract Terms and Conditions and can substantially comply with all requirements therein. We submit the following exceptions for consideration:
1 To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of caused to the extent of the Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole or active negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

We respectfully request approval of our $50,000 deductible.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

BLACKBURN CONSULTING

5.10 TAB H: COMPETENCY OF PROPOSER
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773 City of Roseville Facility Services Division of the Public Works Department, RFP #01-063 34
Proposal for Special Inspection & Materials Testing
Blackburn Consulting, November 2022

5.10 TAB H: COMPETENCY OF PROPOSER
Contract History
In the past 7 years, we have had one claim filed again us.

Summary of Claim:

Shallow clay slide failure, with design inconsistent with Blackburn recommendations in 2016.

Resolved 6/7/2021
Blackburn has never had a contract terminated for breach or any other reason.

Financial Stability
Blackburn has been in business for over 24 years and maintains a well-established business presence in Northern and Central California. We have successfully serviced on-call contracts ranging from $2,500.00 to $9M for various State and local agencies. We are confident that we have the necessary facilities, ability, experience, and financial resources to provide the services required for this contract.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6CF4D8AD-839C-4E9A-A0BD-19AB2FD12773

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2562
File #:
0203-12 & 0201-01
Title:

X-Ray Imaging System - Sole Source Purchase Order and Budget Adjustment Contact:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]
Jeff Beigh 916-746-1058 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a sole source purchase order to Logos Imaging LLC, for the purchase of a X-ray imaging system for a total amount of $87,375. Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $35,995.

BACKGROUND
The primary responsibility for the Roseville-Rocklin Regional Bomb Squad (EOD) is handling suspicious packages and explosive related incidents. The Roseville-Rocklin Regional Bomb Squad is accredited by the FBI and, per their guidelines, the team is required to have an X-ray imaging system. X-ray imaging systems allow for EOD operators to see inside suspicious packages without actually having to open them up or disturb the contents of the package. The current X-ray imaging system was manufactured in 2006 and is no longer supported by the manufacturer. On several occasions, the current system has malfunctioned and the Roseville- Rocklin Regional Bomb Squad has had to request outside assistance from regional EOD teams.

The purchase of a new X-ray system would provide EOD operators with portable features to allow for rapid deployment and identification of suspicious devices or packages. The requested equipment is a regional asset for the Roseville-Rocklin Regional Bomb Squad.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost for a new X-ray system is $87,375. The Roseville Police Department was approved funding for this purchase in the amount of $51,380 from the Placer County Office of Emergency Services through the Homeland Security Grant Program, and the Council previously approved a budget adjustment to appropriate the grant funding. This budget adjustment will increase the capital outlay budget in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund by $35,995 to cover the remaining cost of the X-ray system. There will be no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of equipment and approval of a budget adjustment meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Management Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Quote
Ordinance 6620
Budget Adjustment
Logos Imaging LLC
Logos Imaging LLC
PO Box 576
Windsor CO 80550
(866) 939-4044
www.logosimaging.com
Tax ID # 05-0533782
Quotation
Date
1/26/2023
Quote #
6419
Bill To
City of Roseville
Finance Department
311 Vernon Street
Roseville CA 95678
Ship To
Adrian Coghlan
City of Roseville
1051 Junction Blvd
Roseville CA 95678
Quote Expires
4/26/2023
Sales Rep
Matthew Harrington
Currency
USA
Memo
Payment Terms
2% 10 Net 30
Shipping Via
UPS Ground
Term
FOB
Named Place
Johnstown
Est. Delivery
8 - 12 Weeks ARO
PO:# ________ Date: ___/___/___ Name:_____________________________ Signature: ___________________________ Authorization
By signing below, you (1) confirm that all information in this formal quotation is accurate, (2) accept the billing and shipping Item #
92031-1637-...
90209
60000 US
55277 XIRÓS
91000 US
Detailed Description
Dual Panel XIRÓS II 12x12 and STENÓS II 14x17 Flat Panel Kit Computer kit for Security DR systems.

Includes:
•Getac A140 rugged tablet
•Security software
•Two years software maintenance
Golden Engineering XR150.

Includes:
•XR150 X-ray Machine
•Two batteries
•110V battery charger
Tactical backpack with battery box
DR power cord kit
Qty
1 1
1 1
1 Units
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
Rate
70,519.00
4,006.10
6,169.20
630.50

0.00 Amount
70,519.00
4,006.10
6,169.20
630.50

0.00 Subtotal
Shipping Cost (UPS Ground)
Tax
Total
81,324.80
160.17
5,896.05
$87,381.02
ORDINANCE NO. 6620

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for an X-Ray Imaging System.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this _ day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
ROsEf1LLE REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT

CA LIFO RN IA
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Mark Peinado/ Management Analyst PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Mark Peinado/ Management Analyst FISCAL YEAR:

COUNCIL DATE (if applicable):

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _P___;o_lice __ D--'ep,_a_rt_m_ e_n_t _____________ ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment FY2022-23
3/1/2023
2240 6550 44001 700047 35,995 Increase Capital Outlay for X-ray robot purchase TOTAL 35,995

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment TOTAL .

NET ADJUSTMENT 35,995 !

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION
Fund Account I Center I Project Adjustment
2240 (35,995) use available resources in Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund
TOTAL (35,995)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

The Roseville Police Department has been given approval from Placer County Office of Emergency Services (OES) to purchase equipment with funding allocated from the Homeland Security Grant Program. Placer County OES administers the grants, files claims for reimbursement from the federal government, and then distributes the reimbursements to local agencies. The Police Department was approved $51,380 for the purchase of a Portable X-Ray System, the total cost for the system is $87,374.89. The Police Department is requesting a $35,995 increase in Captial Outlay budget in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund. The funds will be used to pay for the remaining cost of the Portable X-ray System.

REQUIRED APPROVALS:

T\�
4 ,.a�� , \.,_�I 2 �

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD/ DESIGNEE I DATE BUDGET MANAGER/ DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/ DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER/ DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
1/25/20234:07 PM

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2572
File #:
0110-01
Title:

Placer Valley Tourism - 2023 Strategic Marketing Plan and Budget Approval Contact:

Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected]

Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.3.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve the 2023 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Marketing Plan and Budget.

BACKGROUND
The South Placer County Tourism Corporation, dba Placer Valley Tourism (PVT), promotes and supports tourism efforts that generate overnight stays within the region. Revenue to support its efforts is generated by assessments on hotel room nights for all hotels in the cities of Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment was voted on and approved by all hotel owners in 2014.

On November 5, 2014 the City entered into a Marketing Management Agreement with PVT which authorizes PVT to administer and implement all of the activities and improvements of the Placer Valley Sports Complex and Tourism Marketing District (District). Expenditure of assessments received from the District are directed by the PVT Board, which is comprised of hotel, Chamber and city representatives from Roseville, Rocklin and Lincoln. Pursuant to the Marketing Management Agreement, and as required by state law, the PVT strategic marketing plan and budget shall undergo annual review and approval by the City Council. The City Council has the discretion to approve the strategic marketing plan and budget as submitted or may modify any particular matter contained within these documents.

The attached strategic marketing plan and budget was approved by the PVT Board of Directors on January 26, 2023. Revenues are estimated to slightly exceed expenses for 2023. The key strategies in the 2023 Strategic Marketing plan include:

1 .

Grow and expand relationships
2 .

Evaluate and refine existing Roebbelen Center events
3 .

Improve room tracking procedures
4 .

Increase community awareness
5 .

Evaluate and expand current marketing programs

The attached Placer Valley Tourism 2023 Strategic Marketing Plan provides more detailed information. Staff has reviewed and recommends approval of the PVT's 2023 Strategic Marketing Plan and 2023 Budget.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is not a fiscal impact associated with this recommendation. Funding for these PVT activities is derived from room night assessments for all hotels in the cities of Lincoln, Rocklin and Roseville. This assessment is separate and distinct from the 10% transient occupancy tax (TOT) collected by the City of Roseville for all Roseville hotels. The PVT budget includes an expense for a payment to the City, based on a payment plan,
for the repayment
of the long field project
design costs incurred by the City's Citywide Park - West Roseville Specific Plan Fund. The payments are being made annually until the payoff in 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of the Placer Valley Tourism Annual Budget and Strategic Work Plan meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal D - Enhance economic vitality

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-082
2023
PVT Strategic Plan
2023 PVT Budget
RESOLUTION NO. 23-082

APPROVING THE 2023 PLACER VALLEY TOURISM STRATEGIC

MARKETING PLAN AND BUDGET

WHEREAS, the Placer Valley Sports Complex and Tourism Marketing District (District) was created in November 2014 to replace the former South Placer County Tourism Business Improvement Area; and

WHEREAS, Placer Valley Tourism (PVT) administers the District under a Marketing Management Agreement which requires PVT to submit an annual budget and work plan to the City; and

WHEREAS, the 2023 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Marketing Plan and 2023 Placer Valley Tourism Budget have been reviewed by the City Council;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the 2023 Placer Valley Tourism Strategic Marketing Plan and 2023 Placer Valley Tourism Budget is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Reconnect, Evaluate and Grow
Placer Valley Tourism
2023 Strategic Plan

1 Placer Valley Tourism
2022 finally brought a sense of normalcy since the COVID pandemic shut down in March 2020. Placer Valley Tourism (PVT) was able to see the Roebbelen Center (RC) @the Grounds (ATG) operate and host the major events and tournaments that had been planned since the beginning of 2020. With a major event center as its anchor facility, PVT was able to charge forward and host multiple events that significantly generated room nights for Placer Valley hotels. The average weekend occupancy nearly rebounded to 2019 levels with 84% compared to 87% occupancy respectively. The weekend average daily rate (ADR) had the most significant growth outpacing 2019 with $158.50 compared to $125.56.

Unfortunately, due to the slow and reluctant return of the corporate market, midweek occupancy still trails 2019 with 70% compared to 79% occupancy. Midweek ADR saw some nominal growth with $132.12 in 2022 compared to $123.99 in 2019 (see charts below).

2007 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Weekend OCC 72.1% 56.3% 62.9% 71.0% 74.5% 75.1% 78.0% 83.5% 84.7% 85.4% 86.6% 64.9% 83.1% 83.6% Mid Week OCC 66.2% 47.8% 53.5% 59.5% 64.0% 65.4% 67.7% 74.2% 76.8% 76.8% 78.7% 58.8% 69.6% 69.9% 45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Placer Valley Hotels Average Occupancy
Midweek vs. Weekend
2 Placer Valley Tourism

A new challenge arose in July of 2022 as available room nights in the market decreased with the loss of the Hampton Inn and Suites in Roseville, reducing the overall supply by 31,025 room nights annually.

New hotels aren’t expected until the next few years therefore maximizing room nights within the footprint will be pivotal to PVT’s ongoing success.

In addition to the uncertainty that COVID provided over the past two years, in March of 2022, PVT unexpectedly lost longtime dynamic visionary and CEO, David Attaway. As the leadership shifts to the newly appointed CEO, Kim Summers, building and fostering relationships will be extremely important to the organization’s ongoing success. Fortunately, adapting to change is not uncommon for PVT and the transition thus far has been seamless. PVT’s unwavering commitment to drive its existing momentum forward will be best accomplished through predetermined strategies. The five key areas PVT will focus on in 2023 are outlined as follows:

2007 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Mid Week ADR $104 $90 $82 $82 $85 $92 $99 $103 $111 $117 $124 $96 $109 $132 Weekend ADR $98 $83 $77 $80 $83 $90 $98 $105 $114 $119 $126 $97 $127 $158 $70
$80
$90
$100
$110
$120
$130
$140
$150
$160
$170
Placer Valley Hotels Average Daily Rate
Midweek vs. Weekend
3 Placer Valley Tourism

1. Grow and expand relationships
COVID impacted PVT member hotels and event organizations over the past two years. We will look to find ways to encourage increased hotel involvement both at the Board and committee levels. We will reconnect with past partners to understand any shifts in their business plans that could further impact room nights both positively and negatively, and seek out new ones that may have recently emerged.

2. Evaluate and refine existing Roebbelen Center events Now that the RC has been in relatively normal operations for the past 18 months, it will be necessary to evaluate event bookings to ensure maximum room nights are generated moving forward. We will work closely with the existing organizations to ensure room growth potential is actualized and determine the impact that COVID may have had in the success or decline of previously held events.

3. Improve room tracking procedures
With growth comes challenges, and the manual way we have been tracking room nights in the past, requires a tremendous amount of staff time both for PVT and hoteliers. We will look at new software programs to help lessen the burden of the current system which will also provide general statistics and reporting.

4. Increase community awareness
As events get bigger, so does the community impact. PVT will work on effective ways to promote major events further reinforcing the economic impact that tourism brings to the community.

5. Evaluate and expand current marketing programs
4 Placer Valley Tourism
We will evaluate past print marketing campaigns to ensure alignment with new strategies in addition to looking at expanded digital marketing opportunities to increase website and social media traffic.

GROW AND EXPAND RELATIONSHIPS
In most recent years, PVT had been focused on ATG and establishing new relationships with organizations that could fill the RC with room night generating events. Now that ATG has been operating successfully, we will broaden our outreach and look to reconnect with past partners to understand any shifts that may have occurred within their business models. In order to re-establish and foster new relationships, we will take the following steps:
• Host a client appreciation event, recognizing the many great organizations we work with and providing a dynamic networking opportunity
• Work with our City partners to solicit available booking windows and discuss trends they may not be aware of, i.e.: emergence of new organizations and/or events • Evaluate and work with organizations that have the ability to bring new events to the area COVID had a significant impact on the hotel industry causing tremendous staffing shortages which continue to be an ongoing challenge for PVT hotels. From staff wearing multiple hats to new employees, it has been a struggle to ensure hoteliers are aware and take advantage of the services PVT provides.

The following steps will be taken in order to re-connect and increase engagement:
• Host quarterly hotel mixers inviting general managers, sales managers and front desk staff to network and learn more about PVT in a casual format
• Staff and Board members to meet individually with less engaged hotels to find ways to encourage involvement and/or understand their objectives when soliciting room night generating events
5 Placer Valley Tourism

EVALUATE AND REFINE EXISTING ROEBBELEN CENTER EVENTS
Weekends in the RC continue to attract high demand with only a handful of open weekends which traditionally fall on holidays such as Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s. With a fully booked schedule and more demand than availability, we will look to evaluate the room night production of current events to ensure maximum utilization and return for PVT hotels. To properly analyze the events, we will consider the following components:
• How many times had the event been held onsite?
• Were there any COVID restrictions that may have impacted the success of the event? • Was there leakage of room nights outside of PVT hotels? If so, how can we capture more within our footprint?
• Did the organizer track and report room nights?
• Was the facility used at maximum capacity, all courts being utilized or is there still room for growth?
With the exception of a few COVID-daunted events, 2022 was almost PERFECT! There were some instances of first and second quarter events whose participation numbers fell short but overall, organizers were very pleased and eager to return and grow in 2023. To follow is a summary of some RC bookings that had a positive impact on hotel occupancies in 2022:

Volleyball:

Volleyball has swiftly become the #1 room night generator for Placer Valley hotels. As of October 31, 2022, volleyball events have generated 7,039 room nights for Placer Valley hotels.

The RC with its 24 volleyball courts is highly sought after by volleyball organizations. In 2022, 12 girls’ tournaments and 3 boys’ tournaments were hosted by the following organizations:
• Northern CA Volleyball Association, (NCVA)
6 Placer Valley Tourism
• Elite Event Partners, (EEP)/West Coast Volleyball Association, (WCVBA) • Hype Nation Volleyball/Showtime Events
* Due to the Mosquito Fire, two NCVA boys’ tournaments were relocated to Sacramento NCVA falls under the sanctioning body of USA Volleyball, (USAV), whereas Hype Nation and EEP fall under Junior Volleyball Association, (JVA). Both organizations are highly competitive and eager to secure more dates. However, over-saturation of too many “same sport” events will result in a lack of interest by participants resulting in fewer out-of-town travelers. Furthermore, the diversification of sports and host organizations has been paramount to PVT’s success thus far and will continue to be the case moving forward.

Basketball:

Much like volleyball, basketball is an obvious fit for the RC which features 12 state-of-the-art courts.

PVT initially went into 2022 with 7 confirmed basketball events but will end the year having hosted 1 camp and 9 tournaments. And as a bonus, recently added West Coast Elite – The Finals, will occur in the shoulder month of November, 2022.

Of the 9 tournaments booked, all but one was sponsored by a major athletic brand, i.e.: Adidas, Zero Gravity, Nike, and Under Armour. Five of the 9 were NCAA certified events which is HUGE for amateur events. Having a venue and destination that attracts such prominent events, elite athletes and college recruiters, is something to be truly proud of.

With basketball being half the size of volleyball events (12 courts vs 24 courts), it generally does not produce the same room night numbers as volleyball but does fit well into some hotel need periods like July and November when volleyball is not in season. As of October 31, 2022, basketball events hosted at the RC have generated 1344 room nights with more to add following the November tournament.

7 Placer Valley Tourism
Cheer:

JAMZ was the RC’s first event of 2022 but unexpectedly had to cancel when participation numbers suddenly declined and host organization staff fell ill to COVID. But in February, Varsity Spirit Brands filled the RC with high energy and generated 244 room nights! Up next, JAMZ bounced back with a vengeance in mid-November to host the LARGEST Cheer event ever inside the RC with a mere 245 teams on day two of the competition.

Moving into December, Varsity Spirit returns to host the final cheer event of the year. Upon the conclusion of this event, it is estimated that Cheer will likely generate 500+ shoulder month room nights for Placer Valley hotels.

Gymnastics:

Byer’s Gymnastics returned in January to host the 2nd Annual Rose Gold Classic, (RGC). Although the event was fairly well attended, only 67 room nights were tracked leaving opportunity for much improvement in 2023.

In addition to RGC, Byer’s was selected to host the USA Gymnastics Level 6/7 Regional Championship, April 21-23, 2023. This competition will attract gymnasts from 5 states. There will be 8 sessions and 500+ competing gymnasts per day. The expectation for room nights is estimated to be around 500.

IMPROVE ROOM TRACKING PROCEDURES
Room night tracking data provides us with information to measure the success of events, pay grant incentives to event organizers and provide crucial event development funding up to and including capital investments. In 2008, when room tracking became a key component of PVT, we worked with 17 events, compared to 2022 where we are anticipating nearly 400 events. Unfortunately, many of the methods we used in 2008 to report, track and analyze data are still being used today. The sheer volume of events and manual entry system consumes a great amount of staff time for both PVT and hoteliers 8 Placer Valley Tourism
alike. While this is an ongoing issue for the industry and highly likely to always have its challenges, here are some steps we will seek to accomplish in 2023:
• Research software to manage the work flow of grant process and procedures • Refresh and update training guides for hotel trackers and event lead portal • Increase usage of tracking surveys and digital QR codes to reduce manual system • Reconnect with the website/lead portal company to understand and research possible reporting capabilities

INCREASE COMMUNITY AWARENESS
PVT is a small but mighty team that accomplishes a lot while bringing major national events to Placer Valley. The 24 hotels that represent the PVT footprint of Roseville, Rocklin and Lincoln drive a tremendous amount of economic impact for the three cities. While our direct partners are aware of when these major events occur, a large majority of the community is not and it’s time to be vocal as the champion for sports tourism and the hotel industry. To follow are some of the strategies we will use to increase the awareness of PVT’s current and future projects and goals:
• For major events, we will work with PVT hotels to install customized “Welcome” and “Things to Do” posters in their lobbies to greet attendees as they arrive. This will provide a sense of arrival and importance to attendees, engage hotel staff and provide a level of connection between all parties.
• Encourage Board of Directors and staff involvement at community, chamber and city events/meetings to increase visibility, awareness and recognition. Lean on them as stewards of this organization.
• Continue to champion for sports tourism generating facilities and the economic impact of the hotel industry.

9 Placer Valley Tourism

EVALUATE AND EXPAND CURRENT MARKETING PROGRAMS
In 2022, PVT saw some nominal success in our digital marketing as we did our first-ever targeted email campaign in association with Sports Destination Management (a national sports tourism publication) that also included a digital ad redirecting campaign. As we monitor the success of the programs, we will continue to look for new digital campaigns with a targeted focus while also evaluating the print campaigns that we have done in the past.

Thanks to COVID, the reemergence of QR and UTM tracking codes, have proven to be helpful tools in tracking the return-on-investment in real time. Increased social media ads and Google ads will be another tool we will look at to create specific messaging and content to drive traffic to our social platforms and website. As always, working to increase traditional media coverage to drive awareness to our content will be an ongoing task. The key elements we look to market in different campaigns are:
• THE Northern California Youth Sports Destination!
• Suburban market, clean, safe, family friendly
• Things to Do, Area Amenities
• Sports Tourism Facilities (Roebbelen Center, City of Roseville soccer complex, etc.) 2023 Budget 2022 Budget
Revenues
Net Hotel Assessment to PVT 1 2,386,971 2,564,871 3,640,687 -290% (177,900) -7% Other Revenues:
7010 · Interest Income 1,800 600 1 0% 1,200 200% 7020 · Miscellaneous - - - 0% - 0% Subtotal 1,800 600 1 0% 1,200 200% TOTAL REVENUES 2,388,771 2,565,471 3,640,688 -291% (176,700) -7% Expenses
Projects:
4100 · Marketing 2 157,000 140,000 11,534 8% 17,000 12% 4140 · Tourism Study 12,500 12,000 330 3% 500 4% 4160 · Professional Development 12,000 11,000 472 4% 1,000 9% 4250 · Event Support 3 400,000 400,000 131,206 49% - 0% 4550 · Board/Staff Development 18,000 20,000 4,450 33% (2,000) -10% 4800 · Web Site 23,000 25,000 1,721 8% (2,000) -8% 4900 · Community Events 65,000 65,000 1,147 2% - 0% Total Projects 687,500 673,000 150,861 28% 14,500 2% Payroll Expenses:
2210-2700 · Salaries & Hourly Wages 457,948 552,000 18,830 4% (94,052) -17% 2300-2400 · Payroll Taxes & Workers Comp 45,394 50,000 1,555 4% (4,606) -9% 2450 · Incentive 27,916 70,000 (50,151) -64% (42,084) -60% 2500-2600 Employee Benefits 63,125 75,000 3,466 6% (11,875) -16% 2650 · Temp Labor - - (15,525) -100% 39,801 0% Total Payroll 594,383 - 747,000 - (41,826) -7% 67,727 9% 2023 Budget Budget 2023 vs 2022
Projections
Budget 2023 vs Budget
2022
2023 Budget 2022 Budget
Operations:
3090 · Common Area Maintenance/Assoc Dues 12,500 14,000 79 1% (1,500) -11% 3110 · Janitorial/Maintenance 3,000 7,000 167 6% (4,000) -57% 3200 · Utilities 7,000 7,000 1,635 30% - 0% 3300 · Telephone 6,500 8,500 2,506 63% (2,000) -24% 3155 · Office Supplies 19,600 7,000 10,363 112% 12,600 180% 3400 · Insurance-Liability/D&O 7,000 6,500 407 6% 500 8% 3600 · Postage and Delivery 500 600 93 23% (100) -17% 3700 · Accounting and Payroll 4,500 5,700 877 24% (1,200) -21% 3990 · Property Tax 7,500 7,000 289 4% 500 7% 3810 · Dues and Subscriptions 11,000 10,000 248 2% 1,000 10% 3820 · Legal and Professional Services 39,500 40,000 (19,756) -33% (500) -1% 3831 · Expense Reimbursement-Travel 14,000 14,000 5,543 66% - 0% 3832 · Expense Reimbursement-Meals 10,000 10,000 7,220 260% - 0% 3850 · Audit Fee 25,000 7,000 10,000 67% 18,000 257% 3900 · City of Roseville Admin Fee 3,500 3,500 700 25% - 0% Total Operations 4 171,100 147,800 20,372 14% 23,300 16% SUBTOTAL EXPENSES 1,452,983 1,567,800 129,407 10% (114,817) -7% Special Projects:
4855 · Major Projects Rollover - 25,000 (250,000) -100% (25,000) -100% 4880 · Major Projects 500,000 500,000 250,000 100% - 0% 4881 · Speedway Project 5 25,000 25,000 25,000 0% - 0% 4882 · Long Fields Reimbursement 250,000 250,000 - 0% Total Special Projects 775,000 800,000 25,000 3% (25,000) -3% Grand Total Expense 2,227,983 2,367,800 154,407 7% (139,817) -6% Revenue Over Entire Expense 160,788 197,671 (1,000,393) -86% (36,882) -19% Budget 2023 vs 2022
Projections
Budget 2023 vs Budget
2022
2023 Budget 2022 Budget
Statistics
Hotel Assessments to PVT
Roseville 3,566,056 3,598,322 (115,439) -3% (32,266) -1% Rocklin 800,566 855,254 - 0% (54,688) -6% Lincoln 155,779 169,501 - 0% (13,722) -8% Total 4,522,401 4,623,077 (115,439) -2% (100,676) -2% Less Bond Payment 2,135,430 2,058,206 78,009 4% 77,224 4% Total 2,386,971 2,564,871 (193,448) -7% (177,900) -7% Room Nights:

Roseville 548,624 79% 553,588 78% (12,131) -2% (4,964) -1% Rocklin 123,164 18% 131,578 18% - 0% (8,414) -6% Lincoln 23,966 3% 26,077 4% - 0% (2,111) -8% Total 695,754 100% 711,243 100% (12,131) -2% (15,489) -2% Note Receivable Loan to ATG
Comments
1 2
3 4
5 Event Support increases are due to anticipated rise in Events Grants with more events and attendees and Event Development & Support expenses to encourage continued Operations includes purchase of new conference tables and executive desk and potential increased use of outside accounting services.

An expense line has been added dedicated to Speedway expenses to include a feasibility study.

Budget 2023 vs 2022
Projections
Hotel Assessments - Statistics reflect the net amount after the deduction of the quarterly Bond payments. Hotel Room Nights were forecasted flat to 2022 and with the reduced inventory of 24 hotels in the footprint.

Marketing increases are for additional Collateral for local campaigns and return to Trade Show participation.

Budget 2023 vs Budget
2022

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2569
File #:
0709
Title:

Homeless Outreach Worker - Contract Amendment
Contact:

Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.4.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Homeless Outreach Worker Contract Amendment between Placer County Adult System of Care and the City for the extension of the contract from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2023 and adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
In 2018, the City partnered with Placer County to hire a part-time Homeless Outreach Worker to work with the Roseville Police Department Social Services Unit and assist with outreach to members of the community who are experiencing homelessness. Through this position, individuals were connected to housing, shelter, and services, including chronically homeless individuals who obtained permanent housing through the Mainstream voucher program. Based on further research and best practices, as well as discussions with the Downtown Roseville Partnership (DRP)'s Clean and Safe Committee, it was concluded additional outreach staff would make an impact and decrease instances of local homelessness. Through consistent outreach, these workers/navigators are able to:
build relationships with individuals who may have a difficult time trusting others due to life history, mental illness, trauma;
connect people to the services and housing they need when they are seeking help; and b
e responsive to the business community by reaching out to individuals in the downtown area.

In 2019, in partnership with the DRP and Placer County, the City Council approved the Placer County Homeless Outreach Worker Contract.

The contract funded hiring two 28-hour/week
Homeless Outreach Workers to be embedded with the Roseville Police Department Social Services Unit and complete outreach with the unit's Problem-Oriented Policing (POP) Officers in Downtown Roseville and other identified areas.

This partnership has proven to be mutually
beneficial and has strengthened the Homeless Liaison Team between Placer County, Roseville Police Department's Social Services Unit, and the Downtown Roseville Partnership. The program was funded as follows:

DRP - $20,000 per year for two years
Placer County - $40,000 per year for two years
City of Roseville - $20,000 per year for two years

Due to the time it took to hire staff, the outreach workers did not begin working until early fall of 2020. In July 2021 the contract was extended from June 30, 2021 to December 31, 2022 due to available excess funds. Although the intention was to hire two part-time outreach workers, staffing levels have only allowed for one part-time outreach worker at a time. The 2023 Homeless Outreach Worker Contract Amendment requests to continue this position through December 31, 2023 and, due to continued excess funding, requires no additional funds.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City of Roseville originally funded the City’s portion of this contract with Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod funds). No General Fund resources were used for the Homeless Outreach Worker Contract and no additional funding is being requested at this time.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects that have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Acrell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-080
Contract Amendment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-080

APPROVING A CONTRACT AMENDMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND THE COUNTY OF PLACER, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Contract Amendment, regarding providing homeless outreach services within the downtown area, between the City of Roseville and the County of Placer, has been reviewed by the Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Amendment is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

_______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________
City Clerk

Contract Amendment #2 CN001211 Page 1 of 5
City of Roseville
Homeless Outreach Worker

CONTRACT AMENDMENT

Contract No.: CN001211AB Begins: November 21, 2019

Administering Agency: Adult System of Care Ends: December 31, 20222023

Description: Second amendment to this contract between City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the County of Placer, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY,” to extend the term of the contract to December 31, 20222023. All of these changes are reflected in Exhibit B-1B-2.

WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY wish to further identify and outreach with individuals who are homeless and in need of housing coordination and services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has received $20,000 per year for two years from the Downtown Roseville Partnership (DRP) to provide outreach services within the downtown area; and WHEREAS, COUNTY has experience in the identification and hiring of outreach workers in other homeless services programs as well as overseeing case management for adults within Adult System of Care programs; and
WHEREAS, CITY has experience in identifying individuals and families who are homeless and in need of connection to services in Roseville and has previously coordinated with other County contracts in utilizing homeless outreach workers; and
WHEREAS, funding hasn’t yet been expended and both parties agree to extend the term of the current agreement to allow funding to be fully utilized, and WHEREAS, it is understood and agreed by and between the parties of this Agreement that they wish to enter into this Agreement in order to provide a full and complete statement of their respective responsibilities during the term of this Agreement, and Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of this Agreement, effective November 21, 2019, the following amendment is made to the original contract, additions are shown in bold italics, deletions are shown in strike-through:

4. PAYMENT: CITY shall pay to COUNTY as full payment for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement in the amount set forth in Exhibit B-1B-2, titled Payment Provisions. The payment specified in Exhibit B-1B-2 shall be the only payment made to COUNTY for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. The total amount of this contract and payments made under this Agreement shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) per year, EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($80,000) in total. This payment shall be a match with COUNTY funding in an amount not to exceed $80,000of Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) per year, which together shall provide Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000) per year, for this Agreement, which shall be inclusive of all COUNTY costs, including, but not limited to travel, transportation, lodging, meals, supplies, and incidental expenses except as otherwise might be specifically set forth in this Agreement. COUNTY shall use all moneys received under this Agreement in conformity with the provisions of 24 CFR Part 570, issued by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) (Administrative Regulations for CDBG) and the applicable provisions of 2 CFR 200: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (both provided to COUNTY electronically).

5. EXHIBITS: All exhibits referred to in this Agreement, and/or identified in the list of exhibits following the signature page, and / or otherwise attached to the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by this reference and collectively, along with this base document, form the Agreement. In the event of any

Contract Amendment #2 CN001211 Page 2 of 5
City of Roseville
Homeless Outreach Worker
conflict or inconsistency between provisions contained in the base agreement or exhibits such conflict or inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence according to the following priorities:

Exhibit A, Exhibit B-1B-2, base agreement, then followed by any remaining exhibits. Responsibilities and obligations mandated by federal or state regulations or otherwise at law shall be liberally construed to meet legal requirements. Responsibilities and services of COUNTY identified in more than one location will be construed such that the provisions mandating the greater obligations shall control.

7. CONTRACT TERM: This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect from November 6, 2019 through December 31, 20222023. Contract provisions that contain report deadlines or record obligations which occur after contract termination survive as enforceable continuing obligations.

14. NOTICES: All notices required or authorized by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been served if delivered personally or deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows. Changes in contact person or address information shall be made by notice, in writing, to the other party.

If to COUNTY: Jeffrey S. Brown, M.P.H., M.S.W, Director Robert L. Oldham, Director
Placer County Dept. of Health and Human Services
3091 County Center Drive, Suite 290
Auburn, CA 95603
[email protected]

If to CITY: Laura Matteoli, Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678

// Signatures on the following page

Contract Amendment #2 CN001211 Page 3 of 5
City of Roseville
Homeless Outreach Worker
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Agreement as of the day first above stated:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
(“CITY”)

COUNTY OF PLACER
(“COUNTY”)

_____________________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager

_____________________________________
Robert L. Oldham, Director,
Department of Health & Human Services

Date: _______________________________

Date: ______________________________

Approved as to Form
City Attorney’s Office

_____________________________________ Approved as to Form Office of Placer County Counsel
Date: _______________________________

_____________________________________
Date: _______________________________

With the exception of Exhibit B -2 and Exhibit E, exhibits are not attached. Please reference original agreement to view the exhibits that have not changed.

EXHIBITS:

Exhibit B-1B-2 – Payment Provisions
Exhibit E - Information Security Requirements

Contract Amendment #2 CN001211 Page 4 of 5
City of Roseville
Homeless Outreach Worker

EXHIBIT B-1B-2

PAYMENT PROVISIONS

CITY will fund COUNTY in the amount of Forty-Thousand Dollars ($40,000) per year, for the duration of the agreement in an amount not to exceed Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000), for staff costs in support of the outreach worker positions as outlined in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. Additionally, CITY shall provide up to one license to Homeless Outreach Worker positions for the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) over the span of this Agreement. The total contractual obligation for this Agreement shall not exceed Forty-Thousand Dollars ($40,000) per year Eighty Thousand Dollars ($80,000) during the term of this Agreement.

Contract Amendment #2 CN001211 Page 5 of 5
City of Roseville
Homeless Outreach Worker

EXHIBIT E
Information Security Requirements

1. Data Location

1.1. The CONTRACTOR shall not store or transfer non-public COUNTY data outside of the United States. This includes backup data and Disaster Recovery locations. The CONTRACTOR will permit its personnel
and contractors to access COUNTY data remotely only as required to provide technical support. (Remote access to data from outside the continental United States is prohibited unless approved in advance and in writing by the County.)

1.2. The CONTRACTOR must notify the COUNTY in advance and in writing of any location changes to CONTRACTOR’s data center(s) that will process or store County data.

2. Data Encryption

2.1. For all COUNTY data, the CONTRACTOR shall encrypt all non-public data in transit regardless of the transit mechanism.

2.2. For all COUNTY data, if the CONTRACTOR stores sensitive personally identifiable or otherwise confidential information, this data shall be encrypted at rest. Examples are social security number, date of birth, driver’s license number, financial data, federal/state tax information, and hashed passwords.

2.3. For all COUNTY data, the CONTRACTOR’s encryption shall be consistent with validated cryptography standards as specified in National Institute of Standards and Technology Security Requirements as outlined at
http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-111.pdf

3. Sub-Contractor Disclosure

3.1. The CONTRACTOR shall ensure its subcontractors, vendors, agents, and suppliers acting on behalf or, or through CONTRACTOR comply with all COUNTY Information Security Requirements.

4. Business Continuity

4.1. CONTRACTOR shall provide and maintain a business continuity and disaster recovery plan that achieves the County’s Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), as set forth below, and specifically incorporated herein.

4.1.1. Recovery Time Objective is the duration of time within which a service, business process or application must be restored after an outage to avoid unacceptable consequences associated with a break in continuity of business

4.1.2. Recovery Point Objective is the maximum acceptable amount of data loss after an unplanned outage expressed as an amount of time. Example: If RPO is 4 hours, only a maximum of 4 hours worth of data can be lost. Backups should be maintained at intervals of every 4 hours.

5. Breach Notification

5.1. CONTRACTOR shall notify the COUNTY’s contract administrator concerning any breach of COUNTY data or any data incident involving CONTRACTOR’s data in which the security of COUNTY data systems may be compromised within 24 hours of the breach or incident.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2567
File #:
0721
Title:

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Transportation Development Act Claim Contact:

Cameron Schreiter
916-746-1302
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 Transportation Development Act (TDA) claim in the amount of $13,466,680 and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute the claim on behalf of the City; and

2. Approve payment of FY2022-23 LTF funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $56,250 for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program.

BACKGROUND
The Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) has adopted the FY2022/23 Final Findings of Apportionment for the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), State Transit Assistance (STA), and Senate Bill 1 (SB1) State of Good Repair (SGR). Together, these programs comprise the Transportation Development Act (TDA) resources.

LTF revenue comes from a 1/4 cent sales tax in Placer County and is used for local transportation programs. The adopted LTF apportionment resulted in $11,764,381 in LTF available to Roseville for FY2022-23. In FY2022-23, staff is recommending that $2,689,720.82 of LTF be claimed for use in the Transportation Fund to support the City's bikeway and Transportation Systems Management (TSM) programs, and capital projects. The FY2022-23 claim also includes $9,074,660.18 for use in the Transit Fund to support transit operations and capital expenses. Of the City's LTF revenue, $56,250 is recommended to be paid to Placer County Transportation
Planning Agency for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program to increase public
awareness and understanding of transportation needs and funding challenges.

STA revenue is derived from state diesel fuel excise taxes with augmentation from SB1 funds.

STA funds are applied to administration, operations, maintenance, and capital projects for the City's transit system. The total STA funds available to Roseville in FY2022-23 is $1,504,103.

SB1's State of Good Repair (SGR) program provides needed funding towards maintenance of the Roseville Transit bus fleet. The SGR program is funded by a portion of the State Transportation Improvement Fee on vehicle registrations. The amount of SGR funds available to Roseville in FY2022-23 is $198,196.

FISCAL IMPACT
The TDA claim provides a total of
$13,466,680
in revenues to the Transportation and Transit
Fund programs and projects. A payment of
$56,250 is recommended to Placer County
Transportation Planning Agency for the PCTPA Funding Strategy Outreach program.

There is no
fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Submission of the FY2022/23 Transportation Development Act Claim action meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world

Respectfully Submitted,
Cameron Schreiter, Transportation Grants Analyst
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-078
FY2022-23 TDA Claim Worksheet
FY23 Financial Plan Worksheet
FY 22 CHP Inspection Audit
FY23 Annual Project and Financial Plan
FY 23 LTF Claim Form
FY 23 SGR Claim Form
FY 23 STA Claim Form
FY23 TDA Compliance Checklist
RESOLUTION NO. 23-078

APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE 2022/23 TRANSPORTATION

DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIMS TO THE PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION

PLANNING AGENCY

WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200, and Title 21 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with Section 6600, authorize local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and

WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency is responsible for reviewing and approving annual transportation claims, and for making allocations from the Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance Funds;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute the FY2022/23 Transportation Development Act Claims in the amount of $13,466,680 to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency as follows:

1. Local Transportation Funds for public transportation system purposes as authorized by Article 4, commencing with Section 99260 of the California Public Utilities Code and for streets and roads purposes authorized by Article 8, commencing with Section 99400 of the California Public Utilities Code, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $11,764,381.

2. State Transit Assistance Funds for transit operations, as authorized by Section 99313 and Section 99314 of the California Public Utilities Code, Chapter 4, Article 6.5, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,504,103.

3. State of Good Repair Funds for transit maintenance as provided by in Senate Bill 1, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $198,196.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk
FISCAL YEAR:

CITY/COUNTY OF:
4,020,176.00$
-$
-$
-$
2,450,815.00$
-$
381,000.00$
4,463,149.83$
3,727,947.00$
-$
-$
-$
1,251,860.00$
-$
-$
-$
183,081.00$
-$
247,986.93$
-$
(303,407.80)$

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM WORKSHEET
B. Interest Earnings through June 30, 2021.

A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2021. From TDA Financial Audit Report)

1. FTA Planning Assistance

4. Other (list) American Rescue Plan Act _____________________________

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

10. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

2. Charters

3. Other (list) _______________________________
2022/23
City of Roseville
Part 1 of 4

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

11. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)
I. FY 2021/22 AVAILABLE RESOURCES

12. Other (list) __________________________________

1. Passenger Fares
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):
-$

1. LCTOP- Corp Yard Chargers

ESTIMATED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22

3. FTA Capital Assistance

2. FTA Operating Assistance

3. LTF-Community Transit Services(PUC 99275; Article 4.5)

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c; Article 8c)

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

9. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d; <CTSA>)

6. LTF-Capital expenses for contracted transit services (PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

7. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)

8. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)
C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements received in 2021/22:

E. Local Cash Grants:

F. Operating Revenues:
573,526.84$
16,615,134.80$
505,353.00$
-$
-$
301,945.00$
45,000.00$
1,125,368.00$
(44,000.00)$
680,500.00$
7,175.00$
50,605.00$
3,647,031.00$
54,414.00$
123,872.00$
107,670.00$
283,389.00$
-$
-$
-$
80,613.00$
145,617.00$
200,000.00$
150,000.00$
8,528.00$
34,493.00$
9,960.00$
10,000.00$
2,951.00$
G. Other Revenues
II. FY 2021/22 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
I. Personnel

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

12. Miscellaneous Cash Over/Short, Uncollectible

10. Other Materials and Supplies

6. Bus & Car Wash

7. Purchase Seven New Zero Emission Commuter Buses

8. Purchase Eight Replacement Dial-a-Ride Buses

9. Fleet Services Steam Cleaner

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop

2. Transit Plan Update

3. Commuter Bus Replacement

4. On-Board Technology
K. Capital Assets (Itemize)

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

3. Other Salaries and Wages

4. Fringe Benefits
J. Services and Supplies

1. Professional Services

14. Leases & Rentals

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed

3. Other Services

5. IT Tech Replacement Projects

7. Purchased Transit Services

13. Interest

8. Facility Services/System Repair & Maintenance

9. IT Services
H. TOTAL FY 2021/22 AVAILABLE RESOURCES
(A+B+C+D+E+F+G)

2. Maintenance Services
87,888.00$
180,000.00$
1,021,799.00$
1,901,931.00$
178,200.00$
43,000.00$
-$
2,500,000.00$
13,443,302.00$
3,171,832.80$
3,171,832.80$
65,912.00$
-$
-$
460,377.64$
1,251,860.00$
98,226.00$
788,201.00$
136,816.00$
-$

12. Corp Yard Bus Charging Depot

13. Capital Outlay - Vehicles (Non-Revenue)

14. Capital Outlay - Equipment (Bus Shelter Replacement) N. Estimated Deferred Revenue as of June 30, 2022 (H-M)

2. Operational & Capital Reserve
L. Other Uses:

Capital Outlay Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)
M. TOTAL FY 2021/22 EXPENSES & USES (I+J+K+L)

BUDGETED PUBLIC TRANSIT REVENUES & EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
I. FY 2022/23 NON-TDA BUDGETED RESOURCES & DEFERRED REVENUE B. Interest earnings through June 30, 2022

2. FTA Operating Assistance

3. FTA Capital Assistance

1. FTA Planning Assistance

10. AT-Housing Front Counter Security Renovation

11. South Placer Express Bus Service Capital

12. South Placer Express Bus Service Operations

1. South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA)

2. E. Local Non-TDA Cash Grants:

3. LCTOP - South Placer County Transit Projects- Operations A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Unexpended prior year transit cash receipts held in claimants treasury as of June 30, 2022-- From Part 1, line N)

2. LCTOP - Zero Emission Charging Depot

1. State Transit Assistance
C. Federal Grants & Reimbursements

4. Other (list) _COVID-19 , FTA CARES ACT, FTA ARPA
Part 2 of 4
D. State Grants (Source/Amount):
-$
368,074.36$
-$

3. Other (list) __________________________________ 251,842.25$ 524,948.23$
7,118,090.28$
7,118,090.28$
II. FY 2022/23 PROJECTED EXPENSES & USES
462,078.00$
-$
-$
319,491.00$
45,000.00$
996,668.00$
(44,000.00)$
680,000.00$
6,525.00$
50,605.00$
3,647,031.00$
103,414.00$
123,872.00$
106,170.00$
283,389.00$
-$
-$
J. Personnel:

8. Facility Services / System Repair & Maintenance

9. IT Services

10. Other Materials and Supplies

11. Indirect Costs & Other Costs Reimbursed
F. Operating Revenues:

2. Charters

1. Passenger Fares

2. Operating Salaries and Wages

1. H. TOTAL FY 2022/23 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (A+B+C+D+E+F+G)
G. Other Revenues
I. TOTAL FY 2022/23 CARRYOVER & NON-TDA BUDGETED
RESOURCES (From Line H)

3. 3. Other Salaries and Wages

5. Utilities

6. Insurance

1. Administrative Salaries and Wages

7. Purchased Transit Services

12. Miscellaneous Cash Over / Short, Uncollectible

13. Interest

4. Fringe Benefits

1. Professional Services

2. Maintenance Services
K. Services and Supplies:

3. Other Services

4. Vehicle Materials & Supplies
-$
74,715.00$
170,617.00$
551,801.00$
10,000.00$
150,000.00$
3,479.00$
6,182.00$
5,018.00$
30,000.00$
2,855.00$
17,984.00$
700,000.00$
1,325,018.00$
925,630.00$
233,598.00$
40,000.00$
-$
2,500,000.00$
N. TOTAL FY 2022/23 EXPENSES & USES (J+K+L+M) 13,527,140.00$ O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) (6,409,049.72)$
O. Unfunded Balance (I - N) (6,409,049.72)$
4,969,709.21
4,246,897.00$
-$
-$
M. Other Uses:

1. Capital Outlay Reserve Contribution.(CCR 6648)

2. LTF-Capital (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

3. LTF-Community Transit Services (PUC 99275; Article 4.5)

4. LTF-Contracted Transit Service (PUC 99400c: Article 8c)

1. LTF-Operations (PUC 99260a; Article 4)

19. Capital Outlay - Equipment (Bus Shelter Replacement) P. FY 2022/23 LTF TRANSIT CLAIMS:

L. Capital Assets (Itemize):

17. South Placer County Express Bus Service - Capital
III. FY 2022/23 TDA TRANSIT CLAIMS

14. AT-Housing Front Counter Security Renovation

15. Microtransit Vehicle and Charger Purchase

16. Zero Emission Bus Depot Project

4. Bus Rehabilitation

1. Taylor Rd Commuter Bus Stop

2. Transit Plan Update

3. Commuter Bus Replacement

5. On-Board BusTechnology

10. Automotive Services - Bus & Car Wash Replacement

11. Purchase Seven New Zero Emission Commuter Buses

12. Purchase Eight Replacement Dial-a-Ride Buses

13. Fleet Services Steam Cleaner Replacement

2.Operational & Capital Reserve

18. South Placer County Express Bus Service Operations

6. IT Replacement Projects

14. Leases & Rentals
-$
-$
56,250.00$
9,272,856.21$
1,504,103.00$
-$
-$
-$

5. TOTAL STF CLAIM (Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4) 1,504,103.00$
198,196.00$
198,196.00$
10,975,155.21$
I. FY 2021/22 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
2,366,147.00$
8,901,698.00$
47,917.00$
11,315,762.00$
2,691,229.00$

4. STAF-Contracted Service (CCR 6731b)

7. LTF- Planning Support (PUC 99402; Article 8a)

ESTIMATED STREETS AND ROADS TDA EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR A. Carryover from prior fiscal year (Actual Unexpended Prior Year TDA Streets And Roads Cash Receipts Held in Claimant's Treasury as of June 30, 2021. From TDA Fiscal Audits)
S. TOTAL 2022/23 TRANSIT CLAIMS (P6 + Q5 + R2)
Part 3 of 4
B. FY 2021/22 TDA Cash Receipts from LTF trust fund for streets and roads purposes (PUC 99400a).

C. Interest Earned on claimant TDA streets and roads cash balances through June 30, 2022.

5. LTF-Capital Reserve Contribution (CCR 6648)

6. LTF-Capital for contracted transit service
(PUC 99400e; Article 8e)

1. STAF-Operations (CCR 6730a)

2. STAF-Capital (CCR 6730b)

3. STAF-Community Transit Services (CCR 6730d) / CTSA
Q. FY 2022/23 STAF CLAIMS:

R. FY 2022/23 SGR CLAIMS:

1. SGR-Capital (CCR 6730b)

7. TOTAL LTF CLAIM (P1+P2+P3+P4+P5)
D. Total FY 2021/22 Available TDA Street and Road Resources. (A+B+C) D. Federal Grants
E. Capital Contributions

2. TOTAL SGR CLAIM (R1)
4,507,889.00$
-$
225,000.00$
143,521.00$
1,000,000.00$
5,876,410.00$
5,439,352.00$
5,439,352.00$
11,764,381.00$
9,272,856.21$
2,491,524.79$
2,621,913.00$
65,912.00$
8,127,177.00$
2,691,229.23$
124,058.00$
H. Equipment
I. Other - Indirect Costs
A. Carryover as of June 30, 2022 (From Part 3, Line K.)

1. FY 2022/23 LTF Total Apportionment (From PCTPA)

2. FY 2022/23 LTF Transit Claim (From Part 2, Line P6)
Part 4 of 4
F. Transfers In

5. Other Revenue - TDA Bike & Ped Claims for FY23 Projects STREETS AND ROADS TDA BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23
I. FY 2022/23 AVAILABLE TDA STREET AND ROAD RESOURCES
J. TOTAL FY 2021/22 EXPENDITURES (E+F+G+H+I)
K. Estimated Carryover of TDA Street and Road Revenues at June 30, 2022 (D-J)
G. Other Revenue
G. Construction
E. Other Available Revenue Sources for Streets and Roads I. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402)
J. Capital Reserves

1. Federal Grant Revenue

2. State Grant Revenue
B. 2022/23 TDA Funds Available For Streets And Roads
C. FY 2022/23 Estimated Interest Earned on TDA Cash Balances through June 30, 2023.

D. Total Estimated FY 2022/23 Available TDA Resources. (A+B4+C)

3. Balance of 2022/23 LTF Apportionment (B1-B2)

4. FY 2022/23 LTF Apportionment To be Claimed for Streets and Roads Purposes Pursuant to PUC 99400a. (Can Not Exceed Line B3)
-$
10,942,464.23$
1,100,891.00$
391,267.00$
3,749,587.00$
-$
124,058.00$
164,281.00$
1,000,000.00$
6,530,084.00$
1,597,093.00$
H. Administration and Engineering
O. Estimated Carryover as of June 31, 2023 (D-N)
J. Construction
K. Equipment
L. Transportation Planning Process (P.U.C. 99402)
M. Other - Indirect Costs
N. Total FY 2022/23 Estimated Expenditures (H+I+J+K+L+M) N. Capital Reserves
F. Total Available Revenue Sources for Streets and Roads (D+E1+E2+E3)

3. Other Revenue - LTF Unreleased
I. Maintenance
II. FY 2022/23 ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Qualifying Criteria (Highlighted Cells Automatically Calculated) Recent FY 20/21 Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Prior FY 2019/20 Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Change in
CPI
Allowable
Increase
Standard
Met?
% Difference
between Actual
and Target
A.
$105.86 $126.70 4.69% $132.65 Yes -20%
Recent Three FY 2018/19-
2020/21 Average Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Prior Three FY 2017/18-
2019/20 Average Op.

Cost/Rev. Veh. Hr.

Change in
CPI for Prior
Three Years
Allowable
Increase
Standard
Met?
% Difference
between Actual
and Target
B.
$123.39 $133.60 3.07% $137.70 Yes -10%
C.

Not Applicable
D. Not Applicable
Note: (1) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(1)(A) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015. (2) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(1)(B) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015. (3) PUC Section 99314.6(a)(2) as amended into the Transportation Development Act by SB 508 of 2015.

Data Input (Do not input data into shaded cells)
Fiscal Year 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
A. Total Systemwide Operating Costs (4) $6,936,414 $6,978,248 $6,229,434 $5,368,126 B. TDA Allowed Exemptions/Exclusions(5)
Depreciation (PUC 99246)
Charter Service Costs (PUC 99246)
Vehicle Lease Costs (PUC 99246)
C. Adjusted Operating Costs $6,936,414 $6,978,248 $6,229,434 $5,368,126 STA Qualifying Criteria Worksheet (PUC 99314.6)
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
FY 2022/23
Efficiency Standard 1 - Total Operating Cost/Revenue
Vehicle Hour cannot exceed sum of prior year Total
Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour and an amount equal to the product of the percentage change in CPI, multiplied by the preceding year's Total Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour.(1)
Efficiency Standard 2 - Average Total Operating
Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour in the latest three years cannot exceed the sum of the Average of the Total Operating
Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour in the three years preceding the latest year and an amount equal to the product of the average percentage change in CPI for the same period multiplied by the Average Total Operating Cost/Revenue Vehicle Hour in the same three years.
(2)
If neither Efficiency Standard A or B are met, the lowest percentage by which the Total Operating Cost/Revenue
Vehicle Hour Exceeded the target Amount. This portion shall be used only for capital purposes.(3)
The inverse of C shall be allowed for operating purposes. 2A. Fuel costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
Ridesharing Services Costs (PUC 99268.16)
Principal and interest payments on capital projects funded with certificates of participation (PUC 99247)
Cost of "Extension of Services" (PUC 99268.8, 6619.1, 6633.8)

1. Complementary Paratransit Services Costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)(7)
2B. Alternative fuel programs costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
2C. Power, including electricity costs which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
p py
arising out of the operator’s liability which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)
2E. State and federal mandates which exceed prior year's costs adjusted for the CPI (PUC 99268.17)

3. Startup costs for new services for a period of not more than two years.

4. Costs required to operate demand-response and microtransit services that expand access to transit service beyond fixed route corridors.(7)

5. Costs of funding or improving payment and ticketing systems and services.(7)

6. Costs of security and public safety contracts.(7)

7. Any expense greater than the actuarially determined contribution associated with pensions and other OPEB required by GABS #68 and 75.(7)

8. Costs of planning for improvements in transit operations, integration with other operators and agencies, transition to zero- emission operations.(7)
D. Revenue Vehicle Hours 50,824 50,709 49,165 50,709
E. Operating Cost per Revenue Vehicle Hour $136.48 $137.61 $126.70 $105.86 N/A 1% -8% -16%
273.844 281.247 286.388 299.815 These Values are used for Annual CPI (California Urban Consumers) Cal-August 2011 233.256
N/A 2.70% 1.83% 4.69% Cal-August 2012 239.034 2.48%
Cal-August 2013 241.967 1.23%

3.07% Cal-August 2014 247.259 2.19%
Cal-August 2015 251.253 1.62%
Note: Cal-August 2016 256.097 1.93%
(4) Refer to Annual TDA Financial Audit Report Cal-August 2017 263.473 2.88% (5) Refer to Annual TDA Financial Audit Report and/or actual TDA PUC reference to determine if exclusion applies. Updated per AB-149, July 16, 2021. Cal-August 2018 273.844 3.94% (6) CPI data from California Department of Industrial Relations, which uses the United State Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Data. Cal-August 2019 281.247 2.70% The August Statewide CPI index for all Urban Consumers is used per PUC Section 99314.6 (b)(3). Data source link https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/CAPriceIndex.htm Cal-August 2020 286.388 1.83% (7) Definitions updated per AB-149, July 16, 2021. Cal-August 2021 299.815 4.69% F. Annual Percent Increase in Operating Cost per Revenue Vehicle Hour
G. Consumer Price Index Value (CPI) for the State of California(6) H. Annual Percent Change in Consumer Price Index for the State of California
I. Three-year Average Percent Change in Consumer Price Index for the State of California
For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance.

FY20/21 FY22/23
TRANSIT 3,937,960$ 1,118,937$
OPERATING COSTS In Claim OPERATING SOURCES OF FUNDS In Claim Admin & Services 6,780,243.00$ Interest FY22 65,912$ Passenger Fares 371,592$
Operating Reserve 1,500,000.00$ Advertising/Other 205,008$ ARPA 1,990,334$
LTF FY22 4,969,709$
OPERATING COSTS 8,280,243.00$ STA FY22 1,504,103$ 6,473,812.21$ CLAIM
SUBTOTAL 9,106,658$
Carryover (826,415)$
OPERATING REVENUE 8,280,243$
Carryover Total In Claim OP SOURCE OF FUNDS In Claim CAPITAL COSTS In Claim CAPITAL SOURCE OF FUNDS In Claim OPS COSTS FY2021 1,964,529$ Interest Earnings from FY2020 68,567$ Transit Capital Projects 4,246,897.00$ FTA Capital Assistance -$ Admin Wages 506,740$ Passenger Fares 750,072$ LTF FY22 4,048,701$ Fringe 244,362$ Advertising/Other 142,000$ Capital Reserve 1,000,000.00$ SGR FY22 198,196$ 4,246,897.00$ Prof Svcs 40,000$ LTF Article 4 FY21 2,537,005$ Carryover 1,000,000$ CLAIM Maint Svcs 988,000$ SUBTOTAL 3,497,644$
Indirect Costs & Other Reimb. 185,427$ Carryover 2,937,960$ 10,720,709.21$ CAPITAL COSTS 5,246,897.00$ CAPITAL REVENUE 5,246,897.00$ CLAIM OPERATIONAL REVENUE 6,435,604$
Operating Reserve 1,500,000$ -$ OP Costs - OP Revenue (2,971,075)$
OPERATIONAL COSTS 3,464,529$ TOTAL EXPENSES IN CLAIM TOTAL USES IN CLAIM 13,527,140.00$ 13,527,140.00$
Total Carryover (OP+CAP) 173,585$
For Use with Claim Financial Plan to determine Carrover Split bet Op and Cap & to validate Cost and Sources balance.

FY22/23

STREETS & ROADS
Carryover Total 5,439,352$

COSTS SOURCE OF FUNDS
Administration & Engineering 1,100,891$ Carryover as of 6/30/2022 5,439,352$ 2,621,913$ LTF 8a Transp Maintenance/Materials/Supplies 391,267$ LTF Article 8A FY23 2,621,913$ 124,058$ LTF 8a Transp Planning Construction 3,749,587$ LTF Transportation Planning Process Article 8A FY23 124,058$ 4,969,709$ LTF 4 - Op TDA Claim Worksheet H173 Other - Indirect Costs 164,281$ Interest FY2022 through 6/30/22 65,912$ 4,048,701$ LTF 4 - Cap TDA Claim Worksheet H174 Transportation Planning Process 124,058$ Federal Grants 2,691,229$ 11,764,381$ LTF State Grants -$ 1,504,103$ STA Other Revenue 198,196$ SGR
Subtotal 5,530,084$ Subtotal 10,942,464$ 13,466,680$ TOTAL CLAIM Capital Reserves 1,000,000$ FY2022 Unreleased held by PCTPA -$ Total FY 21/22 Estimated Expenditures 6,530,084$ TOTAL Streets & Roads Resources 10,942,464$ Less Costs (6,530,084)$
2,745,971$
Est. Carryover FY23 4,412,380$ 9,018,410$
10,942,464.00$ Prior year carryover and FY 23 claim revenues 6,530,084.00$ FY 23 expenses
4,412,380.00$ balance
-$ amount to release from FY 22 10,942,464.00$ Total FY 23 revenue available
-$ FY 22 Amount unreleased
2,621,913.00$ FY 23 Amount unreleased
2,621,913.00$ Total unreleased

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency Revised August 2022

TDA ANNUAL PROJECT AND FINANCIAL PLAN
This
form will show the planned expenditures of all TDA funds claimed for the fiscal year in addition to any TDA funds carried over from previous years. Briefly describe all operational, capital and/or streets and roads projects which will be funded by TDA moneys. Please show BOTH prior year TDA funds (if any) and current year TDA funds to be used, provide the total cost of each project, and indicate all other sources of funding associated with each project. For capital projects, the projects listed, and their associated costs and funding sources should be consistent with the budget developed in the TDA Claim Worksheet completed for the submittal of this claim. The total project cost and total funding source(s) listed below should balance for each project. See attached sample plan for additional guidance.

Claimant: City of Roseville
Fiscal Year: FY 2022/23
Brief Project Description Project Cost Source of Funding & Amount TRANSIT OPERATIONS Administration & Services $6,780,243 Operating Reserve $1,500,000
OPERA
TIONAL COSTS $8,280,243
Interest Earnings from FY22 $65,912
C
arryover $(826,415)
P
assenger Fares $371,592
Advertising/Other $205,008
ARPA - FTA $460,481
LTF Ar
ticle 4 FY22 $4,969,709
STA FY22 $1,504,103
OPERATIONAL REVENUE $8,280,243
TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS Transit Capital Projects $4,246,897 Capital Reserve $1,000,000
CAPIT
AL COSTS $5,246,897
Carryover $1,000,000
FTA Capital Assistance $0
LTF Article 4 FY22 $ 4,048,701
SB1 SGR FY22 $198,196
CAP
ITAL REVENUE $ 5,246,897
STREETS AND ROADS TSM & Bikeway Program $1,100,891 Maintenance-Roadway $ 391,267
Construction $ 3,749,587
Other $164,281
Transp. Planning Process $124,058
Sub
total $5,530,084
Capital Reserve $1,000,000
STR
EETS & ROADS COSTS $6,530,084
Carryover $5,439,352
Interest Earnings FY22 $65,912
LTF Article 8a FY23 $2,621,913
Transp. Planning Process $124,058
Federal Grants $2,691,229
FY22 C
laim Unreleased $0
STREETS & ROAD REV. $11,449,178
EST. CARRYOVER FY23 $4,919,094

CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
299 NEVADA STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603
FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678
CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:(916) 746-1302 Email:[email protected]
The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code, commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for Local Transportation Funds be approved for Fiscal Year 2022/23, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the Local Transportation Fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Operations: $ 4,969,709 P.U.C. 99260a, Article 4, Transit Capital: $4,048,701
P.U.C. 99275, Article 4.5, Community Transit Services $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400a, Article 8a, Local Streets and Roads $2,621,913 P.U.C. 99402, Article 8a, Transportation Planning Process $124,058 P.U.C. 99400c, Article 8c, Contracted Transit Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ P.U.C. 99400e, Article 8e, Capital for Contracted Services: $Click or tap here to enter $ C.C.R. 6648, Capital Reserve: $Click or tap here to enter $ W
hen approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget. Claimant must submit a complete Fiscal and Compliance Audit for the prior fiscal year prior to issuance of instructions to the County Auditor to pay the claimant in full.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

CLAIM FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
299 NEVADA STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603

FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678

CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:(916) 746-1302 Email:[email protected]

The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State of Good Repair Funds be approved in the amount of $198,196 for Fiscal Year 2022/23, in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer.

Transit Capital (6730a): $198,196

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribut ion, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

CLAIM FOR STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS

TO: PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
299 NEVADA STREET, AUBURN, CA 95603

FROM:

CLAIMANT: City of Roseville
ADDRESS: 316 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678

CONTACT PERSON: Ed Scofield
Phone:(916) 746-1302 Email:[email protected]

The City of Roseville hereby requests, in accordance with the State of California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600, that this claim for State Transit Assistance be approved in the amount of $1,504,103 for Fiscal Year 2022/23 , in the following amounts for the following purposes to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance fund deposited with the Placer County Treasurer:

Transit Operations (6730a): $1,504,103
Transit Capital (6730a): $Click or tap here to enter $
Contracted Transit Services (6731b): $Click or tap here to enter $ Community Transit Services Provided by WPCTSA (6731.1): $Click or tap here to enter $

When approved, this claim will be transmitted to the Placer County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to the applicant is subject to such monies being available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan and budget.

APPROVED: APPLICANT:

PLACER COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

BY: BY:
(signature) (signature)
TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency 3 Revised August 2022

ANNUAL VERIFICATION OF TDA COMPLIANCE TO ACCOMPANY LTF AND STA CLAIMS

FOR TRANSIT / STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES

PART I – ALL CLAIMANTS

1. Date annual TDA fiscal and compliance audit was approved by PCTPA Board:

Pending

2. Is the claimant's retirement system fully funded?
☐ YES
☒ NO

3. Is the claimant using the maximum Federal funds available for transit and/or streets/roads purposes?
☒ YES
☐ NO

PART II – TRANSIT CLAIMANTS

4. Date Transit Operator's Financial Transaction Report was submitted to State Controller's Office: 2/3/2022 Attach copy of dated, signed cover sheet rom report.

5. Are public transit vehicles routinely staffed with one driver?

☒ YES
☐ NO (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.

6. Has the proposed transit operating budget changed by more than 15% compared to the previous year?
☐ Yes (Explain) Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ NO

7. Did the transit operator meet its minimum farebox recovery requirement during the previous fiscal year? (requirement: 15% - Roseville; 12.94% - Placer County; 10% - Auburn)1

☐ YES
☒ NO (see below)

If the farebox recovery requirement was not met, then claimant must complete the following worksheet for the most recent fiscal year. 1Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with farebox recovery ratio requirement during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the requirement was met. AB-149 of 2021 extends the non- compliance relief through FY 2022/23.

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency 4 Revised August 2022

Transit Operating Expenses: 7,539,835 +
Capital Purchases/Reserves: 194,459 = LTF spent in most Subtotal: 7,734,294 - recent fiscal year
Federal Revenues: 1,990,334 = cannot exceed
STA Revenues: 1,251,860 - result below.

Total: 4,492,100 * 0.5= 2,246,050

8. Is there a prohibition on the employment of part-time drivers or on contracting with common carriers?
☐ YES
☒ NO (Explain) The City of Roseville contracts with MV Transportation. MV is responsible for employment of drivers and allows for part-time employment and contracting.

9. Are STA funds being used for transit operating purposes this fiscal year? ☒ YES (see below)
☐ NO

If STA funds are being used for transit operating purposes, indicate which efficiency standard was met. In calculating the operating cost, operators may exclude costs that exceed prior year costs, as adjusted by the CPI. Notes: (1) Use the STA Qualifying Criteria worksheet contained in the TDA Claim workbook to determine eligible exclusions. (2) These items may also be excluded when computing the farebox recovery ratio. (3) You may refer to operating cost figures from TDA fiscal audits for the applicable fiscal year.

Efficiency Standard #1: ☒ Yes ☐ No2

Efficiency Standard #2: ☒ Yes ☐ No2

If neither efficiency standard was met, list the percentage of STA Funding limited to:

Capital Expenditures: Enter %% Operating Expenditures: Enter %.%

10. Describe or attach current fare structure:

Please see the attached fare structure as outlined in the Roseville Transit services guides, overview on Roseville Transit’s website at
https://www.roseville.ca.us/cms/One.aspx?portalId=7964922&pageId=8756474.

11. Attach copy of latest CHP terminal inspection report.

12. Each transit claimant must report on efforts to implement recommendations included in the FY 2018/19 through FY 2020/21 Triennial Performance Audit, which was completed in 2022 (attach additional pages as necessary).

Roseville has developed a standard policy for calculating FTE’s and we have been using that standard since the last Triennial Performance Audit.

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency 5 Revised August 2022

2Assembly Bill 90, 2019-20 [Reg. Session] temporarily prohibits the penalty for non-compliance with required STA efficiency standards during FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. The claimant should still identify whether the standards was met. AB-149 of 2021 extends the non- compliance relief through FY 2022/23.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2563
File #:
0721 & 0214
Title:

Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund - Grant Application Contact:

Ed Scofield 916-869-9109 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing staff to submit a grant application to the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund to provide additional funding for Roseville Transit’s new Proterra electric buses, and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
Roseville Transit is in the process of purchasing seventeen (17) new electric commuter buses from Proterra.

Ten
(10) of these buses are in the advanced design stage and are expected to begin production later this year.

The remaining seven (7) buses will likely be produced in 2024.

Council has approved the purchases of these vehicles.

The majority of the funds used to buy
these buses will come from fed
eral and state funds that have local match requirements. The City's match funds are planned to come from the City's Local Transportation Funds (LTF).

However, staff was made aware of the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Funds which are considered local funds when used in conjunction with a state or federal grant. If the City is awarded these trust funds, the LTF matching funds freed up can be go towards other purposes like buying more buses or constructing bike trails.

Volkswagen established an Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund in part to settle claims that it sold
vehicles with “defeat devices” designed to cheat emissions tests .

The Volkswagen Environmental
Mitigation Trust (Trust) provides about $423 million for California to mitigate the excess nitrogen oxide (NO
X
) emissions caused by Volkswagen’s use of these defeat devices on diesel vehicles.

The Trust provides funding opportunities for specified eligible actions that are focused mostly on "scrap and replace" projects for the heavy-duty sector, including on-road freight trucks, transit and shuttle buses, school buses, forklifts and port cargo handling equipment, commercial marine vessels, and freight switcher locomotives.

The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District is overseeing this program in the Sacramento region. Air Pollution Control District staff have requested a resolution from the City Council authorizing the City to submit funding requests from the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund and, if successful, administer the program. Of the seventeen (17) new Proterra electric buses currently in design, eleven (11) of the buses qualify for Trust funding. If successful, Trust funds will provide the local match of each bus by $180,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated cost for each new electric Proterra bus is $1.2 million. The funding for all seventeen (17) buses is secured. The majority of the funding is coming from federal Low or No Emission Vehicle Program grant funds and state Solutions for Congested Corridors Program funds. Currently, Local Transportation Funds (LTF) will be used as the required local matching dollars. If successful in securing the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Funds, the trust funds will replace the LTF local match in the amount of $180,000 per bus saving the City's LTF for other projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-075
RESOLUTION NO. 23-075

APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR

POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS

DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is in the process of purchasing new electric commuter buses from Proterra; and

WHEREAS, the majority of the funds used to buy these buses are from Federal and State funds, but staff recommends an additional source of funding through the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund, which are considered local funds when used in conjunction with a State or Federal Grant; and

WHEREAS, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District is overseeing the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund in the Sacramento region; and

WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approval of the submittal of a grant application for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Funds.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby authorizes staff to submit an application to the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Funds.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to sign required assurances, and to administer the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Funds with respect to applications for Local, State and Federal programs, projects or grants, on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2561
File #:
0400-04-12-1
Title:

Sierra Vista Parcels DF-1 & DF-2 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Cody Allen 916-517-7598 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Parcels DF-1 & DF-2
,
CWJ# 190607
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Cody Allen, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-074
Notice of Completion
DF-1 & DF-2 Exhibit A- Location Map
DF-1 & DF-2 Final Map

RESOLUTION NO. 23-074

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Sierra Vista Parcels DF-1 & DF-2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Parcels DF-1 & DF-2 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 95 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

U
P
L
A
N
D
D
R

MARKET ST

V I S T A G R
A
N
D
E
B
L

BASELINE RD
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista
Parcels DF-1 & DF-2
Project
Location
.
0 0.50.25
Miles

FIDDYMENTS
A
N
T
U
C
C
I

BASELINE
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
L
U
E

O A K S
V I S
T
A

G R A N D E
P
L
E
A
S
A
N
T

G R O V E
J
U
N
C

T I O N
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2556
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6A2 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441 jtg
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.8.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Fiddyment Ranch
- Phase 3 Village F-6A2
,
CWJ#
190694
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-073
NOC
Exhibit A : Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-073

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F -6A2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Fiddyment Ranch – Phase 3 Village F-6A2 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 36 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

N
H
A
Y
D
E
N
P
W
H
O
L
T
P
W

CRAWFORD PW
B L U
E
O
A
K
S
B
L
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
L
L
O
W
E
R
B
A
N
K
D
R
W
E
S
T
P
A
R
K
D
R

B E N C H M
A
R
KD R
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Fiddyment Ranch Phase 3
Village F-6A2
Project
Location
.
0 0.50.25
Miles
S
A
N
T
U
C
C
I
B
L
U
E

O A K S

WESTBROOK

FIDDYMENT

P L E A S A
N
T
G
R
O
V
E
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2555
File #:
0400-04-09-1
Title:

Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6A1 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Troy Galvin
916-223-7441 jtg
[email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6A1, CWJ#190659 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-072
NOC
Exhibit A : Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-072

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F -6A1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Fiddyment Ranch – Phase 3 Village F-6A1 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 35 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

N
H
A
Y
D
E
N
P
W

CRAWFORD PW
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
L

B E N C H M A R K D R
L
O
W
E
R
B
A
N
K
D
R

HOLT PW
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Fiddyment Ranch Phase 3
Village F-6A1
Project
Location
.
0 0.50.25
Miles
S
A
N
T
U
C
C
I
B
L
U
E

O A K S

WESTBROOK

FIDDYMENT

P L E A S A
N
T
G
R
O
V
E
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2570
File #:
0800-03
Title:

Electric Generation Maintenance and Rehabilitation Support Services - Northern California Power Agency Support Services Program Agreement Contact:

Matt Garner 916-746-1691 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the Electric Utility Director and the City Attorney to execute a Confirmation under the Support Services Program Agreement (SSPA) with the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) for Performance Mechanical Inc. to perform maintenance support and rehabilitation services at Roseville Electric owned or operated generation facilities.

BACKGROUND
On May 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 21-194 which authorized the City Manager to execute the SSPA with NCPA, and appointed the Electric Utility Director and the City Attorney as designated representatives of the SSPA with authority to authorize Confirmations. City Council approval is needed in this instance because the recommended Confirmation exceeds the City Council delegated spending limit of $74,999 under the SSPA.

In power plants like the Roseville Energy Park and Roseville Power Plant 2, maintenance and rehabilitation of steam systems, piping and motor driven equipment is needed to maintain safe, efficient and reliable operation of the facilities. It is more cost effective for a contractor with access to a large pool of specific labor and equipment requiring specialized certification and training to handle some of these tasks, rather than to staff for every specific maintenance activity.

Performance Mechanical Inc. (PMI) was selected in July 2018 through a competitively bid process managed by NCPA to perform maintenance support and rehabilitation services for the benefit of the members, including Roseville Electric Utility. PMI will help perform certain maintenance work at the Roseville Energy Park during our major maintenance effort in April 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of services will not exceed $751,675. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget for FY2022-23.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves maintenance services at existing facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Matt Garner, Power Generation Superintendent
Dan Beans, Electric Utility Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-081
NCPA SSPA Confirmation for PMI
Notice of Exemption
RESOLUTION NO. 23-081

APPROVING A CONFIRMATION UNDER THE SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM

AGREEMENT WITH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA POWER AGENCY, AND AUTHORIZING

THE ELECTRIC UTILITY DIRECTOR AND CITY ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE IT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021, Council adopted Resolution No. 21-194 which authorized the City Manager to execute the Support Services Program Agreement (SSPA) with the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA), and appointed the Electric Utility Director and the City Attorney as designated representatives of the SSPA with authority to execute confirmations of $74,999 or less; and

WHEREAS, City Council approval is required for any Confirmation under the NCPA Support Services Program Agreement over $74,999; and

WHEREAS, in combined cycle power plants like the Roseville Energy Park, maintenance and rehabilitation of steam systems, piping and motor driven equipment is needed to maintain safe, efficient and reliable operation of the unit; and

WHEREAS, Performance Mechanical, Inc. was selected in July 2018 through a competitively bid process managed by NCPA to provide maintenance and rehabilitation work for the benefit of its members, including Roseville Electric Utility; and

WHEREAS, Confirmation No. 0290 under the NCPA Support Services Program Agreement with Performance Mechanical, Inc. in the amount of $751,675, has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that Confirmation No. 0290 under the NCPA Support Services Program Agreement is hereby approved and the Electric Utility Director and City Attorney are hereby authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2566
File #:
0704
Title:

Child Development Services Fiscal Year 2023-24 Agreement Contact:

Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute
a contract with the California Department of Social Services for FY2023-24 for the purpose of providing child care services.

BACKGROUND
Beginning in 1996, the City of Roseville's Adventure Club program began offering subsidized childcare services for qualifying families through the California Department of Social Services grant. Currently, grant funds provide childcare services for over 70 children enrolled at Cirby, Kaseberg and Woodbridge Adventure Clubs. The California Department of Social Services requires a resolution to authorize the City Manager to sign the application documents for FY2023-

24. The FY2023-24 agreement will be substantially the same as the agreement from FY2022-23, which is attached as Exhibit A as a sample.

FISCAL IMPACT
Under the new contract, the City of Roseville can receive a maximum reimbursable amount of $478,904 in FY2023-24 to offset direct program expenses. There is no General Fund impact as the program is funded in the Youth Development Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of an agreement for child development services meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Nereson, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-077
Exhibit A - Sample Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 23-077

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, since 1996 the City of Roseville’s Adventure Club program began offering subsidized childcare for qualifying families through a California Department of Social Services grant; and

WHEREAS, the California Department of Social Services has requested a resolution to authorize the current City Manager to sign the contract documents for Fiscal Year 2023-24; and

WHEREAS, an Agreement to cover direct childcare expenses, by and between the City of Roseville and the California Department of Social Services, will be provided by the California Department of Social Services for execution by the City Manager; and.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville authorizes entering into an agreement to receive grant funds for childcare expenses from the California Department of Social Services.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville, upon receipt and approval of the final contract.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

___________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2565
File #:
0323-01
Title:

Military Equipment Policy
Contact:

Doug Blake 916-746 1043 [email protected]

Troy Bergstrom 916-774-5058 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt findings pursuant to California Government Code Sections 7071 and 7072, and introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.

BACKGROUND
Brief History of AB 481

Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”), signed by Governor Newsom in September 2021, required that law enforcement agencies obtain approval from the agency’s governing body prior to purchasing or acquiring military equipment, using military equipment, and/or collaborating with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or use of military equipment within the governing body’s territorial jurisdiction.

Such approval by the City Council was required to be in the form of an Ordinance, adopting a publicly released, written military equipment policy. AB 481 also required that the military equipment policy address a number of specific topics, including the type, quantity, capabilities, purposes, and authorized uses of each type of military equipment, the fiscal impact of their acquisition and use, the legal and procedural rules that govern their use, the training required by any officer allowed to use the equipment, the mechanisms in place to ensure policy compliance, and the procedures by which the public may submit complaints. To adopt such an Ordinance, the City Council was also required to make the following findings:

A.

The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

B.

The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

C.

If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

D.

Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.

City’s Original Adoption a Military Equipment Policy

At its March 1, 2022 meeting, the City Council was presented with Ordinance 6463, which included the findings required by AB 481 and, if adopted, would approve and adopt a Military Equipment policy for the Roseville Police Department. The City Council elected to move forward with the Military Equipment Policy and introduced Ordinance 6463 for first reading that evening. At its March 15, 2022 meeting, the City Council completed the second reading and adopted Ordinance 6463, thereby approving and adopting Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”.

Annual Review and Renewal of Military Equipment Policy

AB 481 further requires that the City Council review any ordinance adopted pursuant to AB 481 at least annually, and to vote on whether to “renew” the ordinance. In making this decision, the City Council is required to determine whether each type of military equipment owned by the City complied with the findings originally made during adoption of the ordinance. This determination is to be based on an annual “report” prepared by the Police Department that includes at least the following information for each type of military equipment approved for use:

A.

A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.

B.

A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.

C.

The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.

D.

The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.

E.

The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment.

F.

If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

This annual report must also be made publically available on the Police Department’s website, and the Department must hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Roseville Police Department Annual Report

The Roseville Police Department has prepared a 2023 Annual Report that covers the initial reporting period of April 16, 2022 (the day the Department’s Military Equipment Policy became effective) to December 31, 2022. The Report, attached herewith, includes all of the information required by AB 481 and was published on the Department’s webpage on February 1, 2023. The Roseville Police Department also held a community engagement meeting on February 13, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. at the Roseville Police Department.

The general public was invited to attend the
meeting to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. Notice of the meeting was published on the City’s main webpage, the City events calendar, and the Police Department’s webpage and Facebook page. Two members of the community attended the meeting, and neither expressed any opposition to or concern with the 2023 Annual Report or the Department’s Military Equipment Policy.

Council Action to Renew the Ordinance and Military Equipment Policy

As noted above, AB 481 requires that the City Council “renew” the military equipment ordinance, annual report, and policy, and make a determination as to whether the type of military equipment included in the policy has complied with the standards of approval originally adopted by Council. If determined to comply, the governing body can “vote to renew the ordinance” and the corresponding Military Equipment Policy. Because “renewal” of an ordinance is not a traditional City action, it is recommended that Council adopt a new ordinance making all relevant findings, renewing Ordinance 6463, and readopting and continuing the Roseville Police Department’s Military Equipment Policy. No substantive changes are being made to the Military Equipment Policy, and the only minor revision is the addition of one piece of equipment to the inventory list that was acquired during the past year in accordance with Ordinance 6463 and the Policy. Copies of the proposed ordinance and Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, are attached.

It is recommended that Council introduce for first reading an ordinance renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, which will allow for the continued use of “military equipment” as defined by Government Code section 7070.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed policy as the equipment identified in the “Military Equipment” policy has already been budgeted for and acquired. Any future equipment would be subject to approved budgets at the time of acquisition and approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. The proposed Ordinance meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Doug Blake, Captain
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance
RPD 2023 Annual Report - Military Equipment
RPD Policy No. 706, Military Equipment
Ordinance No. 6463
1 ORDINANCE NO. ___

RENEWING CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDINANCE 6463 AND READOPTING AND CONTINUING ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY NO. 706, TITLED “MILITARY EQUIPMENT”

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1.

A. On September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481, relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement agencies.

Assembly Bill 481, codified at California Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body, by an ordinance adopting a “military equipment” use policy, at a regular meeting held pursuant to open meeting laws, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

The term “military equipment” is defined in California Government Code section 7070(c). Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body of a city to approve the funding, acquisition, and/or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it makes specified findings.

B. At its March 1, 2022 meeting, the City Council was presented with Ordinance 6463, which included the findings required by AB 481 and, if adopted, would approve and adopt a Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”. The proposed Military Equipment Policy was consistent with AB 481 and based on a model policy utilized by many other law enforcement agencies in California. The City Council elected to move forward with the Military Equipment Policy and introduced Ordinance 6463 for first reading that evening.

C. At its March 15, 2022 meeting, the City Council completed the second reading and adopted Ordinance 6463, thereby approving and adopting Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”. Through adoption of Ordinance 6463, the City Council also made the following findings:

1. The “military equipment” (as defined by California Government Code section 7070(c)) is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;

2. The “Military Equipment” Policy No. 706 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties;

3. The current “military equipment” identified in “Military Equipment” Policy No. 706 and purchasing any future “military equipment” on the list of “military equipment” (as defined by California Government Code section 7070(c)) is reasonably cost effective compared to available 2 alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and

4. Prior “military equipment” use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time.

D. AB 481 further requires that the City Council review any ordinance adopted pursuant to AB 481 at least annually, and to vote on whether to “renew” the ordinance. In making this decision, the City Council is required to determine whether each type of military equipment owned by the City complied with the findings originally made during adoption of the ordinance. This determination is to be based on an annual report prepared by the Police Department that includes at least the following information for each type of military equipment approved for use:

1. A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use;

2. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment;

3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response;

4. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report;

5. The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment; and

6. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.

The annual report must also be made publically available on the Roseville Police Department’s webpage, and the Department must also hold at least one well- publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

E. On February 1, 2023, the Roseville Police Department published its 2023 Annual Report regarding AB 481 and the Military Equipment Policy to the Department’s webpage. The Report includes all information required by AB 3 481. The Roseville Police Department also held a community engagement meeting on February 13, 2023, at 5:00 p.m. at the Roseville Police Department.

The meeting was well-publicized and the general public was invited to attend to discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the Department’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

F. On March 1, 2023, the 2023 Annual Report regarding AB 481 and the City of Roseville Police Department’s Military Equipment Police was submitted to the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 7072.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Roseville makes the following findings:

A. The City Council has reviewed Ordinance 6463, which was adopted pursuant to AB 481 and approved the funding, acquisition, or use of “military equipment” and approved and adopted Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”.

B. The City Council was presented with the 2023 Annual Report, prepared by the Roseville Police Department pursuant to Government Code sections 7071 and 7072.

C. Based on the 2023 Annual Report prepared by the Roseville Police Department and submitted to the City Council, the City Council determines that each type of “military equipment” identified in the Report has complied with the standards of approval set forth in Government Code section 7071, subsection (d), and adopted by the City Council through Ordinance 6463.

D. The Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, meets all requirements of Government Code sections 7070 – 7075.

E. Ordinance 6463 is renewed and Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, is approved and readopted.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

4 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
2023 ANNUAL REPORT
ASSEMBLY BILL 481 - MILITARY EQUIPMENT
Title: 2023 Annual report for Military Equipment Policy Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 481 Contact: Troy Bergstrom, Chief of Police (916) 774-5010, [email protected] Doug Blake, Captain (916) 746 1043, [email protected]

BACKGROUND
AB 481
Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481” or the “Bill”) was signed by Governor Newsom on September 30, 2021, and requires that law enforcement agencies obtain approval from the agency’s governing body prior to purchasing, raising funds for, or acquiring “military equipment”, using “military equipment”, and collaborating with other law enforcement agencies in the deployment or use of “military equipment” within the governing body’s territorial jurisdiction.

The term “military equipment”, as used in AB 481, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military, obtained from the military, or is even considered military grade. Pursuant to AB 481, items deemed to be “military equipment” include, but are not limited to, unmanned aerial or ground vehicles (i.e. drones or bomb disposal robots), armored vehicles, command post vehicles, battering rams, water cannons, pepper balls, “bean bag” launchers, “rubber bullets”, long range acoustic devices, and commonly used long rifles. The Bill’s stated intent is to increase transparency, accountability and oversight surrounding the acquisition and use of the designated “military equipment” by state and local law enforcement.

After initial approval by the governing body, AB 481 requires law enforcement agencies that receive approval for the use of “military equipment” to submit annual reports to the governing body regarding the use of the equipment, any complaints received, any internal audits or other information about violations of the military equipment use policy, the cost and quantity of each type of military equipment, and the quantity of military equipment if the agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year. The governing body is required to review any ordinance it has adopted at least annually and vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular, public meeting.

Roseville Police Department’s “Military Equipment” Policy The Roseville Police Department’s “Military Equipment” policy complies with AB 481 and is based on a model policy utilized by many other law enforcement agencies in California. The “Military Equipment” policy is reviewed annually and published on the Roseville Police Department’s website.

ANNUAL REPORTING
The Roseville Police Department is required to prepare an annual report for its governing body on the status of the military equipment program. The report must be made publically available on the department’s website for as long as the military equipment is available for use, and the report must include, at a minimum, all information as required by Government Code § 7072. This annual military equipment covers the period of April 16, 2022 (the day the Department’s Military Equipment Policy became effective) to December 31, 2022.

Use of Equipment
All “Military Equipment” maintained by the Roseville Police Department is intended to be used to support law enforcement operations in order to safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties. Any Military Equipment used during the reporting period was consistent with such intended use and pursuant to the Department’s Military Equipment Policy. Attached as Appendix A to this report is a summary of the equipment used and the purpose of the use during the reporting period.

Civilian Complaint Reporting
The Roseville Police Department maintains a procedure for citizens to report a complaint or concern associated with the Department. The Roseville Police Department has not received any complaints from the public during the reporting period regarding the intended or actual use of Military Equipment or the Department’s Military Equipment Policy.

Internal Audits
The Roseville Police Department has assigned a designee to act as the Military Equipment Coordinator.

The Military Equipment Coordinator, among other duties, conducts an annual inventory of all equipment listed under the “Military Equipment” policy. The Roseville Police Department has all equipment listed under this policy documented and accounted for. There have been no reports or complaints of violations of the Military Equipment Policy during the reporting period, and no internal audits have indicated any violations or misuse.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with equipment identified under the “Military Equipment” policy, as the equipment has already been acquired and budgeted for. Any future equipment would be subject to approved budgets at the time of acquisition and approval. Attached as Appendix B to this report is the Roseville Police Department’s current inventory of Military Equipment. Appendix B lists any initial and ongoing costs associated with the Military Equipment. All Military Equipment is funded by City of Roseville general funds allocated to the Roseville Police Department unless otherwise indicated on the current inventory list (e.g., paid for by another local agency, grant funded, etc.).

Quantity Possessed
The Roseville Police Department maintains an updated list of “Military Equipment” in its inventory.

Attached as Appendix B to this report is the current list of qualifying equipment maintained by the Department.

Intent to Acquire Additional Military Equipment
During the next calendar year for reporting purposes (January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2023), the Roseville Police Department does not intend to acquire new equipment that is not already listed on the current Military Equipment inventory (Appendix B). The Department does intend on replacing old equipment that is nearing the end of its expected lifespan, but this will be replacement only and it will not expend existing quantities.

Respectfully submitted,

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE

DATE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USED REASON FOR USE
April 19, 2022 Matrice 210 UAS-Patrol Assist
April 20, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
April 27, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
April 30, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
May 2, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
May 5, 2022 Matrice 210 UAS-Patrol Assist
May 5, 2022 RONS Robot EOD-Deployment for a suspicious device May 16, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
May 23, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
June 1, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
June 4, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
June 28, 2022 40mm Patrol-Uncooperative subject barricaded in vehicle.

July 9, 2022 40mm Patrol-Uncooperative subject failing to comply with commands.

July 11, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
July 30, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
August 15, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
August 21, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
August 23, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
September 1, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
September 6, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
September 17, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist September 23, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist September 27, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist October 5, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
October 7, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
October 12, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
October 14, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
October 26, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
October 26, 2022 40mm Patrol-Uncooperative subject refusing to put down weapon

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
November 2, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
November 6, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
November 11, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
November 19, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
November 25, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 1, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 2, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 8, 2022 40mm Patrol-Uncooperative subject with a felony warrant December 10, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 13, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-SWAT Operation December 13, 2022 Tactical Response Vehicle (TRV) SWAT Operation to assist PCSO SET with search warrant in Granite Bay December 14, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 17, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 20, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist
December 21, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist

APPENDIX A MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE
December 21, 2022 High Explosives EOD-High Explosives used during an outside agency request to countercharge explosives December 30, 2022 Mavic 2 Enterprise UAS-Patrol Assist

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST

DESCRIPTION
(Military item)

QUANTITY
(sought or
possessed)

CAPABILITIES EXPECTED

LIFESPAN

PRODUCT

DESCRIPTION
(MANUFACTURER)

PURPOSE
(AUTHORIZED USE)
FISCAL
IMPACT
(INITIAL AND

YEARLY COST)
LEGAL
RULES

TRAINING
(CA POST OR
OTHER)

COMPLIANCE
(OVERSIGHT)

COMPLAINT

PROCEDURE
TRV 1 Armored
Transportation
Less than
20 years
LENCO Armored
Vehicles
Transportation
and Ballistic
Protection
Initial:
$383,692
Yearly: $1K
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Mobile
Command Post
1 Mobile field
command and
control center
for critical
incidents
Less than
20 years
LDV Vehicles:

Command
Vehicle
Critical
investigative
and public
safety
incidents for
mobile
technology ICS
functions
Subtotal with
Tax:
$490,177.38

Yearly: $300
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
In house
orientation
and IT
support
N/A Roseville Policy
1098
Rifles (SWAT
Issued M4’s)
20 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Colt Arms Lethal Force Initial: $2k
each

Yearly: $200
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Shotguns
(SWAT Issued)
1 Less Lethal
(Orange), 1
Breaching
Less than
Lethal/Lethal
Force
30,000
Rounds
Remington 870 Less Lethal
Force
Compliance/En
try
Breaching/Leth
al Force
Initial: $400.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School/ CA
POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM 2 Less than Lethal
Force
10,000
Rounds
LMT Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $1000
each
Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM Baton
Round
52 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500
max
depending on
dispersion.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Munitions
(4hrs)
Investigation -
Policy 1098
40 MM Baton
Extended
73 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM OC
Round
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM CS
Barricade 4330
59 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $22 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Blank Shell Gas 25 Propel
Chemical
Agents
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Shotgun Bean
Bag Round
6 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $5.
each
Yearly: $0.00
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Gas Launcher
Cup Attachment
3 Launch
Chemical
Agents
Unknown CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $260
ea.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Gas Spike 1 Introducing
Chemical
Agents
Unknown Tomahawk
Tactical
Introducing
Chemical
Agents into
structure
remotely
Initial: $4K
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Flashbang 9 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
9 Bang
Flashbang
0 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Bang Pole 1 Introduce
LSDD’s
Unknown Thunderstick
American
Tactical Entry
Accessories MFG
Introducing
LSDD’s into
specific area
remotely
Initial: $500
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
MP5-SD 1 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Heckler Koch
(HK)
Lethal Force Initial: $1,200
Yearly: $0

835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Jet Smoke 5210
JL
13 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $34 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Baffled Smoke
5210
5 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $35 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Baffled CS 5230 25 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Unbaffled CS
5230
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Aerosol OC CS
6343
17 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $36 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
TRI Chambers 7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years DEF Tech Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
CS 8230 Tactical
Grenade Smoke
7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Muzzle Bangs 50 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial: $7 ea
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Breaching Shells 27 Black
Caps, 32
Green Caps
Breaching
Barricaded
Entry/Lethal
Force
10 years Royal Arms Bolt/Hinge
Removal for
entry into
structures
Initial:$20 ea.
box
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
4210 40 MM
White SMOKE
2 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial:$50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
CS Irritant
Smoke
4 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Sage Control
Ordinance
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Sniper Rifles 4 Lethal Force 10,000
Rounds
Kimber 308 Lethal
Force/Over
Watch
Initial:$3K ea.

Yearly: $100
835a PC &
Federal
and State

CA POST
Basic SWAT
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
case
precedent
Sniper
School
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Inline Night
Vision (Sniper)
2 Night Vision Unknown Knight Force Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Sniper
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Goggles
w/Weapon
Mounted
4 Night Vision Unknown PVS-14 Gen III
WP
Helmet
Mounted Night
Vision
Initial: 5K ea.

Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Rifle Mounted
Monocular
2 Night Vision Unknown SIMRAD
Optronics
Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: 0$
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Monocular
1 Night Vision Unknown NAIT Handheld
Night Vision
Initial:$2K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Red Dot Sight
Apertures
16 Sight Alignment 10 years EO Tech Illuminated
Sight
Alignment
Initial:$300
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Goggles
1 Night Vision Unknown Armasight NVG Head Mounted
Night Vision
Initial:$2K
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pole Camera 1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
Unknown CORE Tactical
Electronics
Real Time
Video Display
from under
closed door or
unreachable
location
Initial: $700
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Robot
(Throwbot)
1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
4-5 years RECON Robotics Remote
Control
Maneuverabilit
y with Real
Time Video
Display
Initial: $6,000
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Magnifiers 15 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 years EO Tech Sight
Magnification
Initial: $400
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Magnifiers
(Snipers)
4 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 Years Leupold MKIV Sight
Magnification
Initial:$400
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Suppressors
(Snipers)
4 Noise
Suppression
10,000
Rounds
Griffin
Armament
Noise
Suppression
Initial:$800
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Patrol Red Dot
Optics
130 Rifle Sight. Non
magnified
10 years Aimpoint Rifle Sight $30 year/
batteries
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour for
Zero.

After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pepperball
Launcher
8 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
Initial: entire
system $700
No annual
fee.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour In-
House Trng
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pepperball
Munitions
1000 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
$1000 year
for inert
rounds.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hours In-
House Trng
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40mm
Launcher
45 (+2 more
in SWAT)
Less Lethal
force
20 years LMT Less Lethal
force
$1000 year/
training
rounds
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4) hour
POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
Investigation -
Policy 1098
40mm
munition
300 Less Lethal Blue
Sponge Round
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1500
year
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST
Certified
Course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40mm
munition
50 Less Lethal
Orange OC
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1000 per
year.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Bean Bag
Launcher
65 Less Lethal
force
30 years Remington Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
Course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1098
Bean Bag
Munitions
400 Less Lethal
force munition
10 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1098
Kinetic
Breaching Tool
1 Breaching
Barricaded
Entry
10 years Kinetic Breaching Forced Entry
Tool
Initial: $0
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098

UAS SECTION
DJI Matrice 210 1
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
9,000 initial /
400-800
annual
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Enterprise 2
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
4500 initial /
800per /
annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Mavic Mini 2
(Purchased
DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
400 initial /
200per /
annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098

APPENDIX B MILITARY EQUIPMENT LIST
DJI Mavic Mini 2 1
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
400 initial /
200 / annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Phantom 4 2
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
At end of
lifespan
DJI See attached
RPD Policy
2000 per
initial / no
annual cost
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
PAN Disruptor 4 General
disruption tool
At end of
lifespan
Ideal
Explosives/Carbo
n Fire
See attached
RPD Policy
$5000 per
unit/ No
annual cost
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
PAN Rounds 96 Rounds General
disruption tool
Consumabl
e
Carbon Fire See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
High Explosives 130 LBS Used in general
disruption
tools, render
safe, and
counter
charging
Consumabl
e
Alpha Explosives See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
ICOR Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ICOR See attached
RPD Policy
$75000/ Part
of a $1500
annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
RONS Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ANDROS See attached
RPD Policy
10-33
program/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
PacBot 2 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
PacBot See attached
RPD Policy
10-33
program/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098

Policy
706
Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/27, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, use, collaborating in the use, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Roseville Police Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms and standard-issue ammunition. • Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/27, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 2
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Roseville Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of the Roseville Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department’s funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department: See attachment:

Military Equipment Jan 2022.pdf
706.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the governing body by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a.

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/27, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 3
(b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment should not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy.The Department should not use military equipment belonging to any other law enforcement agency unless the military equipment is approved for use in that jurisdiction.

Military equipment use and acquisition is often a collaboration with the City of Rocklin and the Rocklin Police Department due to our regional SWAT and EOD teams. 706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.

Roseville Police Department

POLICY MANUAL
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/01/27, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Roseville Police Department Military Equipment - 4
706.9 COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
All complaints or concerns regarding this policy will be handled pursuant to the Department's normal complaint process.

DESCRIPTION
(Military item)

QUANTITY
(sought or
possessed)

CAPABILITIES EXPECTED

LIFESPAN

PRODUCT

DESCRIPTION
(MANUFACTURER)

PURPOSE
(AUTHORIZED USE)
FISCAL
IMPACT
(INITIAL AND

YEARLY COST)
LEGAL
RULES

TRAINING
(CA POST OR
OTHER)

COMPLIANCE
(OVERSIGHT)

COMPLAINT

PROCEDURE
TRV 1 Armored
Transportation
Less than
20 years
LENCO Armored
Vehicles
Transportation
and Ballistic
Protection
Initial:
$383,692
Yearly: $1K
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Mobile
Command Post
1 Mobile field
command and
control center
for critical
incidents
Less than
20 years
LDV Vehicles:

Command
Vehicle
Critical
investigative
and public
safety
incidents for
mobile
technology ICS
functions
Subtotal with
Tax:
$490,177.38

Yearly: $300
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
In house
orientation
and IT
support
N/A Roseville Policy
1098
Rifles (SWAT
Issued M4’s)
20 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Colt Arms Lethal Force Initial: $2k
each

Yearly: $200
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Shotguns
(SWAT Issued)
1 Less Lethal
(Orange), 1
Breaching
Less than
Lethal/Lethal
Force
30,000
Rounds
Remington 870 Less Lethal
Force
Compliance/En
try
Breaching/Leth
al Force
Initial: $400.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School/ CA
POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM 2 Less than Lethal
Force
10,000
Rounds
LMT Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $1000
each
Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM Baton
Round
52 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500
max
depending on
dispersion.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098
Munitions
(4hrs)
Investigation -
Policy 1098
40 MM Baton
Extended
73 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $500.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM OC
Round
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $20 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40 MM CS
Barricade 4330
59 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $22 ea.

Yearly: $100.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Blank Shell Gas 25 Propel
Chemical
Agents
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Shotgun Bean
Bag Round
6 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years Defense
Technologies
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $5.
each
Yearly: $0.00
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Certified
Extended
Range
Projectile
Munitions
(4hrs)
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Gas Launcher
Cup Attachment
3 Launch
Chemical
Agents
Unknown CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Used to propel
chemical
agents from
Gas Launcher
Cup
Initial: $260
ea.

Yearly: $0.00
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Gas Spike 1 Introducing
Chemical
Agents
Unknown Tomahawk
Tactical
Introducing
Chemical
Agents into
structure
remotely
Initial: $4K
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Flashbang 9 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
9 Bang
Flashbang
0 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Defense
Technology
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial:

Yearly:

Rocklin PD
assumed cost
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Bang Pole 1 Introduce
LSDD’s
Unknown Thunderstick
American
Tactical Entry
Accessories MFG
Introducing
LSDD’s into
specific area
remotely
Initial: $500
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
MP5-SD 1 Lethal Force 15,000
Rounds
Heckler Koch
(HK)
Lethal Force Initial: $1,200
Yearly: $0

835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Jet Smoke 5210
JL
13 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $34 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Baffled Smoke
5210
5 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $35 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Baffled CS 5230 25 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Unbaffled CS
5230
15 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $28 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Aerosol OC CS
6343
17 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $36 ea
Yearly: $0
Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
TRI Chambers 7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years DEF Tech Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
CS 8230 Tactical
Grenade Smoke
7 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: Rocklin
assumed cost
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Muzzle Bangs 50 Less than Lethal
Force
10 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Light Sound
Diversionary
Device
Initial: $7 ea
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Breaching Shells 27 Black
Caps, 32
Green Caps
Breaching
Barricaded
Entry/Lethal
Force
10 years Royal Arms Bolt/Hinge
Removal for
entry into
structures
Initial:$20 ea.
box
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Breaching
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
4210 40 MM
White SMOKE
2 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years CTS Combined
Tactical
Solution’s
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial:$50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
CS Irritant
Smoke
4 Less than Lethal
Force
5 years Sage Control
Ordinance
Less Lethal
Force
Compliance
Initial: $50
Yearly:

Dispersion
dependent
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Gas School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Sniper Rifles 4 Lethal Force 10,000
Rounds
Kimber 308 Lethal
Force/Over
Watch
Initial:$3K ea.

Yearly: $100
835a PC &
Federal
and State

CA POST
Basic SWAT
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Roseville Policy
1098
case
precedent
Sniper
School
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Inline Night
Vision (Sniper)
2 Night Vision Unknown Knight Force Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
Sniper
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Goggles
w/Weapon
Mounted
4 Night Vision Unknown PVS-14 Gen III
WP
Helmet
Mounted Night
Vision
Initial: 5K ea.

Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Rifle Mounted
Monocular
2 Night Vision Unknown SIMRAD
Optronics
Rifle Mounted
Night Vision
Initial: $5K
Yearly: 0$
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Monocular
1 Night Vision Unknown NAIT Handheld
Night Vision
Initial:$2K
Yearly: $0
Grant funded
OES
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Red Dot Sight
Apertures
16 Sight Alignment 10 years EO Tech Illuminated
Sight
Alignment
Initial:$300
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Night Vision
Goggles
1 Night Vision Unknown Armasight NVG Head Mounted
Night Vision
Initial:$2K
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pole Camera 1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
Unknown CORE Tactical
Electronics
Real Time
Video Display
from under
closed door or
unreachable
location
Initial: $700
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Robot
(Throwbot)
1 Video Images
from Remote
Location
4-5 years RECON Robotics Remote
Control
Maneuverabilit
y with Real
Time Video
Display
Initial: $6,000
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Magnifiers 15 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 years EO Tech Sight
Magnification
Initial: $400
Yearly: $0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Magnifiers
(Snipers)
4 Magnification
of Sight
Aperture
10 Years Leupold MKIV Sight
Magnification
Initial:$400
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Suppressors
(Snipers)
4 Noise
Suppression
10,000
Rounds
Griffin
Armament
Noise
Suppression
Initial:$800
Yearly:$0
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent

CA POST
Basic SWAT
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Patrol Red Dot
Optics
130 Rifle Sight. Non
magnified
10 years Aimpoint Rifle Sight $30 year/
batteries
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour for
Zero.

After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pepperball
Launcher
8 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
Initial: entire
system $700
No annual
fee.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hour In-
House Trng
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Pepperball
Munitions
1000 Less Lethal
force option
10 years Pepperball Inc Less Lethal
force option
$1000 year
for inert
rounds.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
1 hours In-
House Trng
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40mm
Launcher
45 (+2 more
in SWAT)
Less Lethal
force
20 years LMT Less Lethal
force
$1000 year/
training
rounds
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4) hour
POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Roseville Policy
1098
Investigation -
Policy 1098
40mm
munition
300 Less Lethal Blue
Sponge Round
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1500
year
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST
Certified
Course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
40mm
munition
50 Less Lethal
Orange OC
munition
5 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0-$1000 per
year.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
course
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
Bean Bag
Launcher
65 Less Lethal
force
30 years Remington Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hour POST
Certified
Course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1098
Bean Bag
Munitions
400 Less Lethal
force munition
10 years Def Tech Less Lethal
force
$0 annually.

Being phased
out.
835a PC &
Federal
and State
case
precedent
(4)hours
POST course
Being Phased out
of dept use.

Roseville Policy
1098

UAS SECTION
DJI Matrice 210 1
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
9,000 initial /
400-800
annual
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Enterprise 2
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
4500 initial /
800per /
annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Mavic Mini 2
(Purchased
DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
400 initial /
200per /
annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Mavic Mini 2 1
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
2-5 years DJI See attached
RPD Policy
400 initial /
200 / annual
battery
maintenance
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
DJI Phantom 4 2
(Purchased
from DJI)
UAS – Remote
Piloted
At end of
lifespan
DJI See attached
RPD Policy
2000 per
initial / no
annual cost
FAA
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s.

FAA Part
107, RPD
monthly
training/skill
s
Sergeant and Lt
oversight of the
team / Monthly
Reporting to FAA
Professional
Standards Unit
Roseville Policy
1098
PAN Disruptor 4 General
disruption tool
At end of
lifespan
Ideal
Explosives/Carbo
n Fire
See attached
RPD Policy
$5000 per
unit/ No
annual cost
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
PAN Rounds 96 Rounds General
disruption tool
Consumabl
e
Carbon Fire See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
High Explosives 130 LBS Used in general
disruption
tools, render
safe, and
counter
charging
Consumabl
e
Alpha Explosives See attached
RPD Policy
Part of a
$5500 annual
consumable
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
ICOR Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ICOR See attached
RPD Policy
$75000/ Part
of a $1500
annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
RONS Robot 1 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
ANDROS See attached
RPD Policy
10-33
program/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098
PacBot 2 Remote piloted At end of
lifespan
PacBot See attached
RPD Policy
10-33
program/
Part of a
$1500 annual
maintenance
budget
FBI
Requirem
ents and
Regulation
s
FBI
Hazardous
Devices
School
After Action
Review, UOF
Admin review,
Internal Affairs
Investigation -
Policy 1098
Roseville Policy
1098

2/7/23, 4:08 PM Print Document
https://ecm-web-prd.roseville.ca.us/OnBaseProdIDPEP4/PrintHandler.ashx 1/2

2/7/23, 4:08 PM Print Document
https://ecm-web-prd.roseville.ca.us/OnBaseProdIDPEP4/PrintHandler.ashx 2/2

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2560
File #:
0203-12 & 0201-01
Title:

Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus - Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Jason Rizzi 916-774-5802 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment for the purchase of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) equipment.

BACKGROUND
The Fire Department is requesting a budget adjustment to purchase new self-contained breathing apparatus equipment in the amount of $183,785 for the SCBA program. The Fire Department's initial purchase did not fulfill all SCBA needs for fire apparatus as additional reserve units are required when front line SCBA packs need maintenance. This purchase will also cover the SCBA requirements of Fire Station 8 which will be in service in January 2024. The portion of the SCBA equipment purchase for Fire Station 8 is $41,358. The equipment purchase will be funded through existing funds for equipment in the Fire Academy no longer needed for $109,685, a vendor credit of $56,000 for returned SCBA equipment purchased in a prior year, and $18,100 from the sale of obsolete SCBA equipment. There is no impact on the General Fund.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment for $183,785 to reallocate funds for the purchase of new SCBA equipment. Included in this purchase is the SCBA equipment for Fire Station 8 at $41,358. The equipment purchase will be funded through existing funds budgeted for equipment in the Fire Academy no longer needed for $109,685, a vendor credit of $56,000 for returned SCBA equipment purchased in a prior year, and $18,100 from the sale of obsolete SCBA equipment. No additional General Fund resources are requested.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environment review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a Safe & Healthy Community

Respectfully Submitted,
Jason Rizzi, Assistant Fire Chief
Rick Bartee, Fire Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6619
Budget Adjustment
ORDINANCE NO. 6619

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) equipment.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2564
File #:
0400-04-12-1 & 0201-01
Title:

The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail Project - Reimbursement Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Contact:

Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

(1)
adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the $109,484
Reimbursement
Agreement for a portion of The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail project between the City and John Mourier Construction Inc.; and
(2)
adopt an Ordinance to approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $140,461 for the construction of The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Class I Bike Trail project.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SVSP) and Development Agreement, the developers are responsible for installing a Class I trail on four open space parcels in SVSP Village FD-24.

The Developer, John Mourier Construction, Inc. has agreed to grade a portion of a Class I bike trail in Sierra Vista Specific Plan from Nicole Gee Boulevard south through FD-88A (APN 498- 020-040) to the creek.

FISCAL IMPACT
The developer, John Mourier Construction Inc., will pay up front costs for the construction of the trail at an estimated cost of $109,484. Reimbursement will be provided through bike trail development fees collected for SVSP. There is no impact or cost to the General Fund. Another entity FD-24 LLC is grading a small portion on the trail for $30,977 which is being authorized under a separate reimbursement agreement. The budget adjustment with this item authorizes funding for both of the agreements. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the multi-use trail was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR, certified on May 19, 2010 and SCH NO - 2008032115 and identified in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Based on results of an initial study, construction of the bike trail is found to be within the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analysis of community infrastructure and facilities, including parks, pedestrian bridges, and bike trails, to the extent applicable. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Final EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan multi-use trail. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no additional CEQA review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Engelke, Assistant Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-076
Reimbursement Agreement
Ordinance 6621
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 23-076

APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a City/Developer Reimbursement Agreement for The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 - Class I Bike Trail project, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Reimbursement Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 6621

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2022-23, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for The Village at Sierra Vista FD-24 Bike Trail project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
�
R0sE1fLLE REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT

CA LIFORN IA
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Manager PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Cameron Schreiter, Transportation Grants Analyst FISCAL YEAR: 2022-23
COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 3/1/2023
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -'-P--'W--'--'/-'-Al"""te.;;..r_n""at.;...iv--'e;...T.;...r""a __ nsc.ip'-"o""rt"'a-'--tio.;;..n-'---________ ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment 3319 6587 84001 500320 140,461 Establish Capital Outlay - GIP Projects budget for The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Bike Trail
TOTAL 140,461

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Project Adjustment

TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 14o,4s1 I

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account I Center I Project Adjustment 3319 ) (140,461) Reduce Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund Balance TOTAL (140,461)
Justification for Bud et Ad·ustment:

This budget adjustment is requested to establish project # 500320 - The Villages at Sierra Vista FD-24 Bike Trail. This budget will pay for the reimbursement agreements with FD-24 LLC and JMC to construct a Class I trail in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan, Village FD-24 and 6B.1. The funding for this trail project comes from fees collected in Fund 3319 - Neighborhood Park - Sierra Vista Fund. There is no impact or cost to the General Fund for this project.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER/ DESIGNEE

POSTED BY
Revised: June 24, 2019
12/7/20223:18 PM
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

DATE
Digitally signed by Dennis Kauffman
Date: 2022.12.20 18:24:06 -08'00'
DATE
BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

DATE
Digitally signed by Nancy
Nancy Rothlisberger Rothlisberger
Date: 2022.12.20 16:42:53 -08'00'

BUDGET MANAGER/ DESIGNEE DATE

CITY MANAGER/ DESIGNEE DATE

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2575
File #:
0400-04-04-2
Title:

Second Reading - North Central Roseville Specific Plan Parcel 42A (572 Gibson Drive) – Shea Properties Apartments Rezone Project
Contact:

Escarlet Mar 916-774-5247 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 6623 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6624 ADOPTING A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

ROSEVILLE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, for second reading and adoption.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Escarlet Mar, Associate Planner
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6623
Ordinance 6624
Development Agreement
ORDINANCE NO. 6623

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED

WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the rezone specified herein, and makes the following findings pursuant to Section 19.86.050 of the Zoning Ordinance:

1. The rezone is in conformance with the public interest, health, safety, or welfare of the City; and

2. The rezone is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs, and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan.

SECTION 2. Section 19.06.020 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Roseville, Ordinance No. 5428, is amended to change the zoning of that portion of certain real property within the City of Roseville located in the North Central Roseville Specific Plan as shown and so designated in Exhibit “D,” attached and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication byposting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2023, by the following vote on roll

call: AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 6624

ADOPTING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with Chapter 19.84 of Title 19 of the Roseville Municipal Code (the Zoning Ordinance) of the Cit y of Roseville, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the City of Roseville enter into a Development Agreement by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville Land Holdings, LLC, pertaining to property located within the North Central Roseville Specific Plan area.

SECTION 2. Prior to considering the Development Agreement, the City Council considered the Addendum to the 2035 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (inclusive of the 2021 Housing Element Addendum), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.

SECTION 3. The Council of the City of Roseville has reviewed the findings of the Planning Commission recommending approval of the Development Agreement, and makes the following findings:

1. The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, programs and land use designations of the City of Roseville General Plan and the North Central Roseville Specific Plan;

2. The Development Agreement is consistent with the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance;

3. The Development Agreement is in conformance with the public health, safety and welfare;

4. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of the property or the preservation of property values; and

5. The provisions of the Development Agreement will provide sufficient benefit to the City to justify entering into said Amendment.

SECTION 4. The Development Agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville Land Holdings, LLC, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's Department and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is directed to record the executed Development Agreement within ten (10) days of the execution of the agreement by the City Manager with the County Recorder's Office of the County of Placer.

SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of its adoption.

SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

2 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2571
File #:
0114
Title:

Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy - 2023 Contact:

Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Adopt the attached Legislative Platform, which includes a set of priorities, legislative principles and platforms to guide the City's State and Federal legislative and judicial advocacy programs through 2023. (Attachment A)

BACKGROUND
The State and Federal priorities and legislative platform defined within the document are the result of the City Council’s articulation of its goals and priorities during legislative updates and the City Council’s Legislative Platform Workshop held January 11, 2023.

The Legislative Platform
conveys the City Council’s positions on issues that are currently, or are anticipated to be, the focus of future legislation by the State and Federal governments.

City Council’s adoption of this platform authorizes the City's active participation to influence State and Federal decision-making on legislative, administrative, regulatory and funding issues and to support judicial advocacy consistent with the City's priorities. Using this document as a guide, the City will adopt positions on specific legislation, regulations and budget proposals, and respond to requests for amicus curiae support when the outcome of a pending lawsuit is likely to significantly affect a priority concern of the City. The Mayor will sign letters based on the City's identified interests; the Mayor and other Council Members will advance City interests through individual and regional advocacy efforts; and the Mayor will act on requests from the City Attorney to join in friend-of-the-court briefs.

Staff recommends that the Legislative Platform be updated annually to be responsive to changes to the State and Federal legislative and regulatory environments and to reflect the interests unique to Roseville, the region and interests that may also be common to cities throughout the State.

Effective Platform Implementation

An assortment of internal and external resources is used to effectively administer the City’s legislative platform, they include:

• The City Council Law and Regulation Committee is a standing, advisory committee of the City Council with review and recommendation authority. The Committee provides a forum to introduce, discuss and more thoroughly analyze selected proposed State and Federal legislation, policies and regulations that have the potential to impact City departments, the community and the region.

• Staff works collaboratively with the City’s Federal and State lobbyists to understand and develop strategies for influencing legislation.

The City’s Federal lobbyist also works closely with staff to help identify funding resources for departmental projects and will review grant applications before they are submitted.

• In addition to the City’s lobbyists, staff interacts and participates with organizations such as The League of California Cities, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, North State Water Alliance, Northern California Power Agency, California Municipal Utilities Association and the Roseville Chamber of Commerce to advocate on issues that are important to the City.

• Internally, government relations staff works with staff from each department on legislation, regulations, and project funding opportunities that are important to their departments.

During the
course of the legislative year staff monitors introduced legislation, develops priority lists of legislation for each department and makes recommendations on letters of support/opposition as the bills progress through the legislative process.

• Government relations staff works closely with the staff of the City’s State and Federal representatives to ensure the City’s position on legislation is clearly understood by Roseville’s representatives.

The development of this relationship and exchange of information with the City’s representatives is an effort that continues throughout the entire year.

Working collaboratively with the City Council’s Law and Regulation Committee and the City’s internal and external partners ensures that the City’s advocacy strategy has the greatest ability to influence legislation and policies that are crucial to the City. The City has successfully demonstrated the ability to work with this process and to develop coalitions that take positions on legislation in a manner that is beneficial and supportive of the adopted platform.

Platform Modifications

Modifications were made throughout the 2023 platform to ensure the City is well-positioned to effectively advocate for or against legislation, policies and regulations introduced during the 2023 legislative and congressional sessions. These modifications were reviewed and discussed with the City Council during the Council’s Legislative Platform workshop.

All additions/edits that were provided for Council’s review at the Legislative Platform workshop have been incorporated into the 2023 Legislative and Regulatory Platform for State and Federal Advocacy. In addition, based on comments provided by City Council the following statements were added to the platform in the described sections:

City’s Federal and State Legislative Platform
• Oppose new legislation or regulations that would restrict or eliminate local control over cannabis and cannabis related products.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries Platform
• In item #1, “equity” was replaced with “equality”.

Housing and Community Investment Platform
• Advocate for and support legislation that provides state and federal funding for dedicated mental health and drug treatment housing and services.

Council members Alvord and Roccucci also provided comments regarding electric bikes (e-bikes) and whether it would be worthwhile to add a statement to the platform that would support legislation to incentivize e-bikes. Staff has discussed and researched the item further and determined it would be premature to include a statement supporting legislation that would incentivize e-bikes in the 2023 Legislative Platform.

There isn’t disagreement over whether e-bikes provide some benefit or option to a car or other type of bike, rather that at this time the City is still in the process of analyzing and developing effective plans for all types of electric vehicles within the City. This includes addressing issues such as infrastructure requirements, safety and defining protocols for the various types of e-bikes.

For these reasons, the recommendation is to defer this item until next year and consider the item again at that time. This will allow staff more time to analyze and possibly develop the necessary policies and/or protocols to ensure the safe operation of e-bikes on the City’s infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT
The costs to implement the legislative advocacy program are included in the City’s approved budget.

The Legislative Platform has no direct fiscal impact to the City’s budget; the platform provides policy direction only.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Wolinski, Government Relations Administrator
Megan Scheid, Deputy City Manager

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Legislative Platform Attachment A

1 City of Roseville
2023 Legislative and Regulatory Platform
for State and Federal Advocacy
Attachment A
Roseville City Council
From left to right: Councilmember Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember Scott Alvord, Vice Mayor Krista Bernasconi, Councilmember Tracy Mendonsa, Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt Roseville City Council Goals 2020-2024
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Contents
Background ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 Strategies for Effective Platform Implementation ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 City of Roseville Priorities for 2023 ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 Administrative Services Goal������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 Community Development Goal ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������8 Public Safety Goal ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 Economic Development Goal �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 Electric and Environmental Utilities Goals �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session �������������������������������������������������������������20 Background
1 Background
The positions defined within this Legislative and Regulatory Platform reflect the City Council’s goals and priorities as well as its position on issues that are currently, or are anticipated to be, the focus of future legislation and regulation at the state and federal levels� Council’s adoption of this platform authorizes the City’s active participation to influence state and federal decision-making on legislative, administrative, regulatory and funding issues and to support judicial advocacy consistent with the City’s priorities�
Using this document as a guide, the City will adopt positions on specific legislation, regulations and budget proposals, and respond to requests for amicus curiae support when the outcome of a pending lawsuit is likely to significantly affect a City priority� The Mayor will sign letters of support or opposition based on the City’s identified interests, the Mayor and other Council Members will advance City interests through individual and regional advocacy efforts, and the Mayor will act on requests from the City Attorney to join in friend-of-the-court briefs�
Staff recommends that the Legislative and Regulatory Platform be updated annually to be responsive to changes to the state and federal legislative and regulatory environments and to reflect the interests unique to Roseville and interests that may also be common to cities throughout the state� Strategies for Effective Platform Implementation
2 Strategies for Effective Platform Implementation
• City staff works collaboratively with our federal and state lobbyists to understand and develop strategies to respond to pending legislation and regulations� The City’s federal lobbyists also work closely with staff to help identify funding for a diverse set of infrastructure projects to ensure the City has the knowledge and opportunity to pursue directed funding� The federal lobbyists also support City staff by reviewing grant applications before they are submitted and securing support for any submittals� Staff will scrutinize grant requirements for matching funds, environmental review, or for new requirements required to ensure they have a reasonable correlation to the value of the funding and the benefit being derived from the grant� • City staff participates in stakeholder organizations such as The League of California Cities, Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), Placer County Transportation and Planning Agency (PCTPA), Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, Northern California Power Agency (NCPA), California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA), Municipal Information Systems Association of California (MISAC), California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), Central Valley Clean Water Association (CVCWA), Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) and the Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce to advocate on issues that are important to the City� This allows the City to have a stronger voice and a greater potential to influence key policy and legislative matters�
• Government relations staff works with each department to develop awareness and understanding of legislation, regulations, and project funding opportunities� During the course of the legislative year, staff monitors legislation, develops priority lists of legislation for each department, and makes recommendations on letters of support or opposition as bills progress through the legislative process�
• Government relations staff strategizes and coordinates with other jurisdictions, special districts and organizations on key issues of common interest to ensure a stronger voice on legislation, regulatory and policy matters�
• City advocacy letters are signed by the Mayor� In the event the Mayor is not available to sign an advocacy letter, the responsibility will reside with the Vice-Mayor� • Government relations staff work closely with state and federal elected officials, legislative staff and regulatory agency staff to ensure Roseville’s policy positions and needs are clearly understood� This activity and exchange of information continues throughout the year� • Proposed City advocacy positions on bills that would result in the issuance of or a vote for a new state bond will be brought to the full Council for its consideration and direction� Working collaboratively with the Council’s Law and Regulation Committee and the City’s internal and external partners ensures that the City has the greatest ability to influence legislation and policies that are important to the City� The City has successfully used this process of proactive advocacy and coalition development to take positions on legislation to effectively advance the legislative platform and secure federal and state assistance that benefits the residents of Roseville� Strategies for Effective Platform Implementation
3 Funding Opportunities
City staff seeks to develop outside state and federal funding opportunities for Roseville projects and programs�
We take the following approach to accomplish this:
1� Developing relationships that will leverage funding opportunities by actively promoting Roseville projects that provide a mutual benefit for our funding partners� 2� Advocating with local and regional partners for projects and programs worthy of state and federal funding that deliver value to the Roseville community� State and Federal Funding Requests
Projects (not in order of priority):
1� Cybersecurity technology and IT infrastructure improvements needed to comply with state and federally mandated regulations and laws�
2� Regional road and highway improvements including I-80/Hwy-65 Interchange, Hwy-65 Widening, Baseline Road Widening, Blue Oaks Widening, Andora Widening and Placer Parkway� 3� Fleet electrification including vehicles, charging facilities, tools, and training� 4� Emerging energy- and water-use efficiency technologies and conservation programs� 5� Water-supply reliability improvements such as increased conjunctive use capacity, diversification of water supplies as it pertains to implementation of the Roseville Groundwater Strategic Plan, and recommended in other long-range resource planning documents� 6� Technologies and projects that modernize and improve water treatment and expand conveyance capacity and create water access redundancy to create resiliency to climate impacts and other natural disaster events including power supply disruptions, decrease in operational performance at Folsom Reservoir and other threats� 7� Expansion of wastewater digestion capacity to provide organics recycling and biogas clean energy generation and support compliance with organics diversion� 8� Pursue federal infrastructure funding under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act�
9� Projects that fund water and wastewater infrastructure improvements to Roseville’s older core neighborhoods�
Initiatives: Promoting economic stimulus and infrastructure investment a� Projects that provide jobs especially in the areas of energy, water, transportation, public safety and community development�
b� Assistance for business attraction, expansion, retention, and formation� City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
4 City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
Citywide Legislative Principles
1� The City of Roseville believes in local control and the ability of the City Council to make decisions that address the needs of residents, visitors, and businesses within its jurisdiction� In general, the City of Roseville will oppose legislation that erodes local control and will support legislation that increases local control�
2� The City of Roseville also believes in fiscal responsibility and requires financial flexibility to carry out its mission and objectives for the community� The City will oppose legislation that hinders financial flexibility while supporting legislation that encourages financial flexibility� 3� Oppose unfunded mandates from legislation and regulations that require the City to provide a service or benefit without appropriate and full funding� 4� Where applicable, the City will advocate for the use of existing programs and structures to streamline the creation of new state programs�
5� Oppose legislation that would negatively impact City revenues including but not limited to sales tax, property tax, other General Fund and enterprise fund revenues� Support legislation that protects and maintains City sales tax revenue�
6� Advocacy on sales tax or state bond legislation beyond these guidelines will be brought to the full Council for consideration and direction�
7� Support sponsoring or co-sponsoring legislation that meets the objectives of the City’s legislative principles and platform�
8� Support legislation and provide leadership in crafting a regional vision and agenda that leverages regional assets in delivering a better economic and social environment and reinforces the value and versatility of regionalism to address complex regional issues including transportation, economic development, education, land use policy, water supply reliability, environmental concerns, and intraregional inequities in housing and education� City’s Federal and State Legislative Platform
1� Oppose state and federal actions that would lead to incompatible consequences and/or have an adverse impact on the City’s ability to comply with state and federal regulations and/or legislation�
2� Support legislation that would further the stated missions of the City’s departments and oppose legislation that would impede the ability of each department to effectively meet its operational objectives�
3� Support legislation and regulations that protect City investments in infrastructure and other projects and enhances financial sustainability of City assets� 4� Support legislation and policies that protect our residents and businesses from inconsistent, unnecessary and costly regulations and guidance, mitigation requirements, and permitting mandates
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
5 5� Oppose legislation and regulations that would adversely affect or divert City revenues to the state or any other entity�
6� Support legislation that would require the state or federal governments to pay for unfunded mandates�
7� Oppose legislation that would impose significant compliance costs to the City and where a public benefit has not been identified to justify the costs� 8� Oppose legislation that would eliminate or curtail local control over City owned property, physical assets and infrastructure including cybersecurity mandates� 9� Oppose new legislation or regulations that would restrict or eliminate local control over cannabis and cannabis related products�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
6 Administrative Services Goal
To protect the ability of the City to make decisions unencumbered by onerous policies and regulations that are costly and/or restrictive in how they must be implemented regarding areas of finance, human resources, city clerk, information technology and purchasing; to ensure the City’s positions regarding pension reform are clearly articulated by providing input and expertise in response to future legislative efforts�
We take the following approaches to accomplish this:

Administrative Services Platform
1� Support legislation and measures that protect the City’s rights in the collective bargaining process�
2� Support legislation, policies and regulations that simplify the administration of public records, election code and Brown Act provisions�
3� Oppose legislation that diminishes enacted workers’ compensation reforms and cost controls� 4� Support efforts that engage and include local government in future pension reform discussions and legislation�
5� Oppose legislation and regulations that place new environmental requirements on local agencies that would inhibit the City’s ability to fulfill its mission and are not accompanied by funding necessary for implementation�
6� Support legislation, policies and regulations that simplify public procurement and contracting� 7� Oppose legislation that restricts or diminishes the City’s ability to procure goods and services efficiently and effectively�
8� Oppose legislation that alters the tax treatment of municipal bonds such as proposals that would cap or eliminate the current tax-exempt status�
9� Support reasonable and common-sense legislation and regulations that clarify conflict-of- interest rules�
10� Support legislation and policies that encourage streamlining of business processes for responding to open records requests and that provide funding for these activities� 11� Support legislation that includes operational expenses as an acceptable use of public, educational, government access (PEG) funds collected from cable-franchise agreements per the Federal Communications Commission for government-access stations� 12� Support legislation that restores the federal tax exemption for advance refunding bonds as a critical cost-saving tool for local governments�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
7 Information Technology Platform
1� Support legislation that promotes and provides funding for increased ability to manage technology, assistance in adhering to regulatory compliance requirements and reducing the risk of cyber-attacks�
2� Oppose legislation that would require public agencies to share information in public settings that could be used by groups or individuals with malicious intent to compromise the systems, services or private information of public employees or citizens� 3� Support legislation and regulations that ensure emergency communication capabilities and interoperability for information technology and public safety departments and agencies� 4� Support legislation that would clearly maintain local authority as it applies to platforms like cable, telecommunications, broadband, video, cellular, and Net Neutrality for all current and future development and deployment�
5� Support legislation that promotes artificial intelligence that is human-centric and socially beneficial, fair, explainable and transparent, secure and safe, and accountable� 6� Support legislation for cost-effective environmental technology initiatives� 7� Oppose legislation that would restrict procurement practices or impact vendor interaction� City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
8 Community Development Goal
To act on legislation that would affect our ability to amend and implement our General Plan policies and/or restrict local control over development or impose new regulations that will increase development costs and place greater demands on the City’s General Fund� The intent of our General Plan policies is to create an attractive, vibrant, well-planned city, demonstrated by balanced land uses with desirable neighborhoods, prosperous businesses, excellent schools, convenient public services and open space and recreation amenities all linked by superior transportation systems that include well-maintained streets, sidewalks, bike paths and transit in a cost- effective and financially sustainable manner�
We take the following approaches to accomplish this:

Public Works Platform
1� Support continued reauthorization of the nation’s highway and transit funding bills� 2� Oppose legislation that reduces, restricts or eliminates transportation revenues for transportation purposes or creates new unfunded state and federal mandates on transportation projects�
3� Oppose legislation or other efforts to eliminate local control of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant program (STBG) funding�
4� Support legislation that provides additional funding for local roadway maintenance, transportation and infrastructure�
5� Oppose legislation that would increase traffic congestion and/or reduce roadway vehicle capacity as a means of reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled and/or greenhouse gases (GHG)� 6� Support legislation that allows local governments to determine local roadway Level of Service (LOS) policy�
7� Oppose legislation that places new restrictive burdens or oversights on local transit� 8� Oppose legislation that reduces the ability to use high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes by transit, paratransit and other high-occupancy use vehicles� 9� Support legislation, policies and regulations that allow the use of Medi-Cal funds for transportation purposes and support Medi-Cal policies that promote the use of transit/ paratransit as Medicaid providers�
10� Support legislation that provides tax incentives for people who use public transit and other alternatives to driving a single-occupant personal vehicle� 11� Support legislation and advocate for reasonable Advanced Clean Fleet fules, targets, and exemptions�
12� Support legislation that provides funding for cities to comply with state and federal mandates regarding flood-protection levels
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
9 Development Services Platform
1� Support legislation that strengthens local control in the areas of transportation and land-use policies and assists local governments in integrating new growth� 2� Support legislation, policies and regulations that ensure local governments maintain local land-use control and maintain the ability to address local constituents’ concerns� 3� Support legislation that provides funding and other financial support for the production of affordable housing�
4� Support legislation that requires transparency, consistency, and accountability at the state level�
5� Support legislation that ensures local control and flexibility in determining reduction measures for greenhouse gas requirements�
6� Support legislation and regulations that streamline state and federal permitting processes and require agencies to consider the economic impacts and equities of mitigation measures regarding permits for water supply, flood control, air quality, water quality and sustainability� (This list is representative and not intended to be exhaustive�) 7� Oppose legislation for new wetlands regulations that duplicates similar requirements at the federal level�
8� Support legislation for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) reform that streamlines the environmental review process and reduces opportunities for ”green mail” lawsuits� 9� Support legislation that would purge laws and regulations that are redundant and/or no longer applicable or necessary�
10� Advocate for appropriate federal resource agency staffing levels to ensure Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations are completed within statutory timeframes (in particular, for the National Marine Fisheries Service)�
11� Support legislation that ensures the rules governing representation of a city on a Board, Committee, or Commission with regional authority allow for meaningful and continual participation by the most populous cities on that Board, Committee, or Commission� 12� Support legislation that more narrowly defines the California Department of Fish and Wildlife jurisdiction under California Department of Fish and Wildlife Code Section 1600 (Streambed Alteration Agreement)�
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Platform
1� Support legislation and measures that fund recreation, fitness, and wellness, and prevention programs that also include mental health and diversity, equality and inclusion plans for youth and adults�
2� Support legislation that protects funding for the State Library Fund� 3� Support legislation and new measures for park, recreation, and library programs, services, and special events�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
10 4� Support new initiatives that provide funding for park and public facilities development, rehabilitation, and operations�
5� Support full funding of state parks grant programs, recreation, bike trails, open space, and library grants; including, but not limited to, the Land and Water Conservation Fund� 6� Support legislation and budgets that fund development of capital park and open space improvements and rehabilitation�
7� Support legislation that funds ongoing operational values for recreation and library programming, including fitness, wellness, enrichment, maintenance, and books/technology for youth and adults�
8� Support legislation that would further fair and appropriate access to park and library resources for all persons; including, but not limited to, those that are homeless� 9� Support legislation that defines appropriate penalties for incidents of vandalism and property theft�
10� Support legislation that assists local agencies including parks departments with funding and/ or resources for addressing clean-up and hauling of items from encampments� 11� Support legislation that provides increased funding for arts and culture for the benefits it would provide to the residents, schools, and nonprofits regarding arts and culture� Building Inspection Platform
1� Promote public health and safety in building construction through responsible legislation that adopts building codes through the regulatory process and allows for local control of enforcement�
2� Support legislation that enhances code enforcement through a uniform approach at the state level with input from the local authority by going through the regulatory process� 3� Oppose legislation that mandates specific enforcement requirements through the legislative process�
4� Protect the ability to adopt local amendments to fire and building codes� 5� Oppose legislation that places additional burdens of enforcement on local officials but is not directly related to issues of health and safety�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
11 Public Safety Goal
To act on legislation that hinders our ability to protect and enhance the safety and quality of life for our residents, businesses, customers and partners by providing effective responses to all service requests; to promote programs that minimize risk and maximize the safety for our entire community; and to deliver community risk-reduction programs and exceptional solutions as a cohesive team and in a collaborative manner�
We take the following approaches to accomplish this:
1� Oppose legislation and regulatory policies that negatively affect the funding and operations of the police or fire departments�
2� Oppose legislation that would decrease state and federal funding for programs and services including Homeland Security�
3� Oppose reductions to the levels of state and federal funding opportunities for public safety programs and/or services�
4� Support legislation that ensures flexibility for and local control of all grant resources and funding for public safety technology and mandatory reporting systems� 5� Protect the ability to adopt local amendments to fire and building codes� 6� Oppose legislation that would reduce or eliminate funding for disaster mitigation� 7� Oppose legislation that reduces or eliminates local law enforcement flexibility or otherwise enacts broad sentencing reforms that reduce sentences for non-violent crimes in a general fashion�
8� Support legislation that provides municipalities with local control to provide para-transport, community para-medicine services and illness-prevention practices and programs� 9� Support legislation that provides adequate funding to cities for realignment services and oppose legislation that reduces or eliminates funding for those services� 10� Support legislation that results in regionalization of public safety functions and local control of regionalization of fire services�
11� Support legislation that requires the state to pay for unfunded mandates related to new public safety training requirements�
12� Support legislation that provides new and/or increased funding for mental health programs, services, and substance abuse treatment�
13� Support legislation that provides funding for first responder programs that improve response to mental health crisis calls for service�
14� Support legislation that provides funding for Police social services programs and outreach� 15� Support legislation that provides funding for public safety infrastructure projects including construction of various types of training facilities�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
12 Economic Development Goal
To act on legislation that affects the City of Roseville’s ability to create a vibrant business and community environment that enhances the quality of life for our residents, promotes employment opportunities, and provides outstanding potential for our businesses and partners to flourish� To provide exceptional facilities, programs, services, affordable housing and economic opportunities in a safe environment by supporting, activating, and maintaining neighborhoods and commercial districts� To create a vibrant economic development environment by forming effective partnerships for the purposes of acting on legislation that encourages and assists with the development of jobs, businesses and industry sectors and maximizes social and economic opportunities� We take the following approaches to accomplish this:

Housing and Community Investment Platform
1� Support legislation and appropriations that fully fund assistance for affordable housing, prevention and solutions to homelessness, and community investment funding, including the federal Housing Choice Voucher (HCV)/Section 8, Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs�
2� Support legislation and measures that create new state incentives for affordable housing and infill development�
3� Support legislation that increases flexibility and local control in the state housing element/ Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process and streamlines environmental statutes� 4� Support streamlining of the requirements for the types of projects that can be funded with state and federal funding�
5� Support legislation and advocacy efforts to protect existing and expand options for housing and community investment funding that will support goals for the City’s core area and provide support for community assets�
6� Support legislation that provides funding, accountability, and program resources to address the primary causes of homelessness and needs of the homeless population� 7� Oppose legislation that revamps the current RHNA process by reducing local control and/ or giving greater authority to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to oversee and enforce regional housing goals and in determining a methodology for allocating housing needs to regions and local jurisdictions; and, that links housing element certification to non-housing grant sources�
8� Support legislation that expands the local construction workforce through economic development training programs in an effort to reduce the cost of housing and promote economic opportunity for low-income households�
9� Advocate for and support legislation that provides state and federal funding for dedicated mental health and drug treatment housing and services�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
13 Economic Development Platform
1� Oppose legislation and measures that create competitive disadvantages for businesses at local and state levels�
2� Support legislation and measures that allow the City to grow the current economic base by providing the tools and resources needed for businesses to expand and flourish� 3� Support legislation, funding and policies that promote Regional Occupation Programs, trade and skills training, innovation and entrepreneurship, investment in research and development technology, and tax incentives for key industry sectors including manufacturing� 4� Support legislation, policies, and regulations that require economic analysis and/or scientific validation of changes to state policies or regulations before modifications can be enacted� 5� Oppose legislation that negatively impacts the City as it relates to the dissolution and wind- down of the Redevelopment Agency�
6� Support legislation that promotes, enhances and provides incentives for business retention and expansion, while ensuring California’s business environment remains an economically viable and competitive destination with national and international markets� 7� Support legislation that supports the development and expansion of higher education institutions including new private institutions and satellite campuses of national universities as an important segment of growth, workforce and economic development throughout the state� 8� Support legislation that creates a new tax increment program that will assist cities and counties with revitalizing their communities through the elimination of physical and economic blight and by providing assistance to building owners, tenants and businesses in their efforts to be successful�
9� Oppose legislation that restricts the City’s ability to dispose of real property or retain control over how the property is used�
10� Support legislation, funding, and policies that promote and retain job growth in the City, increase talent pipelines, expand employment opportunities at all levels and support employment opportunities that provide broad public benefits within the City� City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
14 Electric and Environmental Utilities Goals
To protect local control over how utilities provide services to our customers; to protect our customers from state and federal legislation, policies, and regulations that have no clear benefit relative to cost; and to oppose legislation, policies, and regulations that create unfunded mandates and compliance requirements that negatively impact the utilities’ ability to provide their services and products in the most safe, reliable and cost-effective manner�
Electric Utility Platform
Roseville Electric Utility’s mission is to improve the quality of life in our community and to provide customers with safe, reliable electricity at competitive prices and with exceptional service� As technological advancements in the electric utility industry evolve and new legislative and regulatory mandates emerge, the electric utility will continue to transform its business model to best serve its customers in the most efficient, reliable and cost-effective way� We take the following approaches to accomplish this:
1� Support legislative efforts that retain local decision-making authority over programs, services, resources and rates�
2� Support legislation that maintains flexibility to comply with regulations in the way that best reflects community priorities�
3� Support legislation that enables meeting the state’s energy and environmental policies in a cost-effective and reliable manner�
4� Support measures that promote affordability for our customers� 5� Support legislation that preserves public tax-exempt financing and advanced refunding� 6� Support future transmission system improvements and requirements which ensure that cost allocation is born by the parties that impact and/or stand to benefit from those improvements� 7� Support legislation that provides greater flexibility to meet the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) program; and oppose legislation that would reduce flexibility in complying with the RPS program�
8� Support legislation and regulations that streamline permitting for new and existing generating facilities�
9� Support legislation that fosters the utility’s role in local and regional economic development efforts including business retention and expansion�
10� Support technology advancements and efficiencies that benefit our customers in a cost- effective and reliable manner�
11� Oppose measures that would decrease our ability to make financial decisions that protect the financial health of the utility�
12� Oppose legislation that creates new jurisdictional review over Publicly Owned Utilities (POU)� City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
15 13� Oppose legislation that mandates power purchases from specific projects and/or specific resources that do not fit the needs of our community or do not serve our customers in a reliable, affordable manner�
14� Oppose legislation that would reduce funding for existing energy programs and mandates� 15� Oppose legislation that will increase utility operating costs without commensurate funding� 16� Collaborate with neighboring utilities on legislative issues that impact the electric utility industry as a whole�
As part of the legislative and regulatory platform, Roseville Electric Utility also takes advocacy positions to promote the City’s position before the applicable regulatory agencies� Environmental Utilities Platform
Roseville’s Environmental Utilities (EU) Department operates three utilities: Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services� EU strives to deliver critical public health and sanitation services efficiently and economically� EU’s services include management of groundwater, recycled water, and stormwater programs for the dual benefit of Roseville’s residential and business customers and the environment� There are many external factors that influence how EU operates, what it charges for utility services, and the kinds and quality of services provided to its customers� We take the following approaches to accomplish this:

Resiliency, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Sustainability:
1� Support efforts that reduce GHG emissions to ensure ratepayer benefits are commensurate with costs�
2� Support efforts that allow local governments to develop practical, local solutions to reduce and manage locally generated GHG emissions�
3� Support only those statewide and federal GHG emission estimating, monitoring, and reporting mandates that provide demonstrated benefits to the environment and rate payers� 4� Advocate for policies that provide assistance to address utility resiliency needs, including planning, deployment of technologies, provide redundancy, and improve the environment and other actions�
5� Advocate for policies and funding that will help Roseville and the Sacramento Region address anticipated impacts from climate change focusing on drought and atmospheric rivers as projected in region-specific modeling in the American River Basin Study by the U�S� Bureau of Reclamation�
6� Identify and pursue funding opportunities to improve the resilience of Roseville’s utilities from climate related impacts�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
16 Recycling and Product Stewardship:
1� Advocate for the development of the recycling market by the state and federal governmental entities for recyclables, green waste, food waste, biosolids, plastics, and other organics� 2� Oppose mandated material-disposal bans or restrictions when there is insufficient capacity or available technology within the private recycling market to handle these materials in a more beneficial way besides landfilling�
3� Support efforts to reuse waste in a beneficial way if cost-effective� 4� Support efforts to enact a comprehensive statewide Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) law that allocates end-of-life disposal costs with the producer of the product consistent with Council direction as outlined in Council Resolution 10-278� 5� Support product-by-product EPR laws as a second alternative to a statewide comprehensive EPR law consistent with Council direction as outlined in Council Resolution 10-278� 6� Oppose efforts to increase recycling diversion rates if determined not to be cost-effective relative to the benefits that could be achieved�
7� Oppose efforts to increase statewide tipping fees where there is no clear benefit to Environmental Utilities ratepayers�
Water Supply and Delivery:
1� Continue to safeguard Roseville’s water supply contracts – both the City of Roseville’s non-CVP water service contracts with neighboring agencies, as well as the City of Roseville’s Repayment Water Service Contract executed by the Bureau of Reclamation on February 28, 2020� 2� Support and advocate at the local, regional, state and federal levels to fund the city and region’s water supply portfolio and achieve a regional water supply that is sustainable and reliable for generations to come�
3� Support efforts that allocate the costs for Delta and statewide water infrastructure improvements to the parties that either impact the Delta and/or stand to benefit from those improvements, known as the “Beneficiary Pays Principle”� 4� Support Delta and statewide solutions that are based upon sound science and up to date data� 5� Oppose efforts that impose arbitrary flow requirements on the American River that are inconsistent and incompatible with responsible water-supply management and undermine the locally developed flow-management principles under the Water Forum Agreement� 6� Support efforts to implement a locally developed Modified Flow Management Standard on the lower American River that supports the Water Forum effort and its successor effort and provides for appropriate carryover storage at Folsom Reservoir� 7� Support proactive and participatory approaches to developing Delta and statewide solutions� 8� Protect primacy of Roseville’s (and the region’s) ability to manage its groundwater resources� 9� Protect the City’s land-use authority and its right to make land-use decisions with respect to water supply�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
17 10� Oppose efforts to standardize water-supply contingency actions� 11� Oppose efforts to impose arbitrary pressure management requirements that negatively impact the efficient and cost-effective delivey of water to our customers without a demonstrated benefit�
Drought and Water Use Efficiency:
1� Support efforts that maintain local control over drought-related decisions that are consistent with the City of Roseville’s most recent Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan�
2� Support efforts that help local governments maintain water-efficiency programs that meet state objectives, are cost-effective, and make sense for the local conditions� 3� Support state and federal efforts to increase water-efficiency ratings for common consumer products that use water, including tax credits similar to those provided to energy efficient use technologies�
4� Oppose efforts by the State of California to impose additional unrealistic water efficiency targets beyond those being implemented via Assembly Bill 1668 and Senate Bill 606� 5� Oppose proposed water use efficiency standards or water loss standards that do not recognize previous water-supply reliability and water efficiency investments and achievements by the region and local community�
6� Support water efficiency policies that enhance key City investments such as undeveloped and developed park lands the City’s urban forest, and oppose policy that would diminish or impair investments�
7� Support efforts that allow local agencies to develop and implement practical and locally controlled water-use efficiency programs and solutions� Stormwater and Green Infrastructure:
1� Oppose efforts to impose additional state-mandated stormwater program requirements without commensurate funding for those programs�
2� Identify and pursue funding opportunities to support stormwater infrastructure (including green infrastructure) investments that protect Roseville’s public health and safety, water quality, and economic development�
3� Support policies that reduce the cost of compliance for stormwater dischargers� 4� Support legislative efforts to reduce the potential of third-party lawsuits pertaining to stormwater quality issues�
5� Support legislation that revises the state Constitution to allow for stormwater programs to establish a funding mechanism that is similar to that of other water utilities under the Proposition 218 reforms�
6� Support efforts to require pesticide manufacturers to produce products that are less harmful to the environment�
City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
18 7� Support efforts to implement statewide Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principles so that manufacturers design their products in a way that has less of an environmental impact upon local waterways (example: car brake pads)
Biosolids, Recycled Water and Energy:
1� Support continued availability and expansion of biosolids beneficial use and disposal options� 2� Support peer reviewed, science-based risk assessment models to govern biosolids treatment mandates�
3� Support exemption of biosolids from Superfund liability� 4� Support state and federal funding programs for any potential City waste-to- energy projects� 5� Participate in Basin Plan Amendments to address proposed changes in the requirements� Worker Safety, Recruitment and Training:
1� Support efforts that protect solid waste, water, wastewater and recycled waterworker safety� 2� Support efforts and programs that promote utility workers as great careers 3� Support efforts to fund and create local technical training, internships, apprenticeships and journey persons in key water and wastewater positions – both formal college and trades education training pathways�
4� Support efforts that require manufacturers to provide training on the servicing of their products� Example: as the state is pushing for the electrification of our fleets we would like to see requirements on the manufacturers of those vehicles to provide training to our technicians so they can provide routine maintenance�
Legislation, Regulations and Permitting:
1� Support legislative reform efforts that require a cost/benefit analysis for new regulations and flexibility on permit terms to recognize technology and construction factors� 2� Support legislative efforts to reduce the potential of third-party lawsuits pertaining to water quality issues�
3� Oppose efforts to impose a tax or fees where revenue is collected from local ratepayers or agencies and are allocated for statewide projects that have no direct benefit to Roseville’s ratepayers�
4� Support legislative and regulatory efforts that increase development and use of available recycled water supplies and create a policy environment that supports the development of emerging advanced treatment technologies�
5� Oppose regulation or other limits on biosolids management options without validated scientific findings on need for new limitations�
6� Advocate for Advanced Clean Fleet regulations that takes into account state legislation and regulations on reducing and mitigating the impacts of short-lived climate pollutants� City of Roseville Priorities for 2023
19 7� Oppose efforts to increase whole effluent toxicity testing for recycled water, stormwater and wastewater when it is not cost-effective, has no clear benefit and/or is not based on sound science�
8� Ensure efforts to add testing or regulation for contaminants of emerging concern in recycled water, stormwater, and wastewater are cost-effective, have a demonstrated health benefit and/ or is based on peer reviewed, sound science�
9� Support legislative and regulatory policies that target source control and place clean- up responsibility on the manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances or manufacturers of products containing intentionally added PFAS� 10� Support policies or regulations that streamline environmental compliance while protective of public health�
11� Monitor and advocate for laboratory standards that are reasonable, cost-effective, and ensure data quality for the City’s water quality laboratory which supports the core mission of protecting human health, the environment and safety�
12� Support modernization of permitting processes, including extended permit terms of up to ten years to address the lifecycle of technologies and construction schedules� 13� Support efforts to streamline permitting, construction, and funding of facilities that allow the City to transform waste into energy or useful products� 14� Actively track, comment, and advocate on proposed changes in National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System Permits and Waste Discharge Requirements from the State Water Board and Regional Water Boards�
15� Support policies that reduce the cost of compliance for wastewater dischargers� 16� Support streamlined permitting to more effectively implement regional conjunctive use programs in order to build a more drought resilient water supply for the Sacramento region Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session 20 Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session • Tax or Fees – The City has concerns regarding the Legislature’s desires to establish effective constraints on the ability of local agencies to impose fees and charges to mitigate housing impacts� We will advocate for local control and the ability to impose fees and charges to mitigate the impact of new development on current residents and businesses� • Accessible, Affordable, and Safe Drinking Water – While the customers of the City of Roseville enjoy access to safe, reliable, and affordable drinking water, there are many in California that do not� Roseville is supportive of innovative statewide policies to help bridge that gap, so long as the financial burden is not carried by our customers�
• Additional Water Efficiency Requirements while Water Agencies implement AB 1668 and SB 606 – The City of Roseville is actively implementing AB 1668 and SB 606� During droughts, there is a tendency for new legislative concepts to be introduced as a reactive response to drought conditions� Often such actions do not add value, place a local financial burden and get in the way of implementation of new water efficiency laws already in place� It is the City of Roseville’s belief that the State Legislature should allow for implementation of these new water efficiency laws first, evaluate the effectiveness of such laws and then determine whether additional legislative actions are needed�
• Existing Investments in Roseville’s Circular Economy – The City is concerned with proposed policies related to short-lived climate pollutants and the state’s efforts to require zero-emission vehicles including heavy-duty fleet vehicles such as our refuse trucks� We will work to educate state and federal policy makers about the unique role that full-service cities can play in meeting climate goals�
• Cost-Effective Utilities – The ability to provide reliable and cost-effective utilities to the residents and businesses of Roseville continues to be a central concern as new state and federal mandates are proposed that would increase the utilities operational costs� We will continue to advocate to maintain local control of utility rate setting and oppose any state or federal efforts to reduce local control�
• Federal and State Funding for Water, Transportation and other Infrastructure Projects – Maintaining or increasing funding for these types of projects and improvements is critical for the City’s ability to maintain a robust economy, providing high paying jobs, upgrading and maintaining roadways, and meeting future infrastructure and transportation demands� Federal assistance in the form of grants, highly subsidized loans, Build America Bonds, and Advanced Refunding are examples of federal assistance that should be part of any federal assistance program�
• Cybersecurity – Future state and federal laws regarding cybersecurity will continue to affect the City and the community� Implementing new cybersecurity requirements will add significant expense to the operation of the City’s information technology systems� Support legislation and state and federal budget requests that would provide funding for upgrades to the information technology systems that are needed to meet new mandates and requirements� • Changes to Tax-Exempt Status of Municipal Bonds – Any proposals that would cap or eliminate the tax exemption on municipal bonds would significantly reduce the City’s ability to finance major projects� This would negatively and severely impact the City’s budget, increase rates for utility customers, and have a damaging effect on the community at large� Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session 21 • Modifications to Government-Operated Mortgage Programs – The City will remain active in understanding the changes being considered at the federal level to modify government- operated mortgage programs, tax deductions, and to write new banking regulations regarding mortgage-related lending programs�
• Challenges with State and Federal Permitting Processes – The City remains interested in pursuing ways to facilitate more effective federal and state regulatory agency permitting processes� A specific concern is the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) that has become a “one size fits all” approach to identifying and mitigating vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts, which does not reflect or serve the diverse conditions and needs of communities throughout California�
• Changing Economy – The City is interested in discussions regarding local tax systems including the fundamental shift from purchasing taxable commodities to purchasing non-taxable services and ultimately how these changes affect the City’s ability to fund basic services • Sales Tax – The City is concerned with the uncertainty over potential changes to the sales tax allocation structure that would result in a loss of revenue to the City� The City will actively monitor the ever-changing discussions and will remain engaged to ensure the City’s best interests are represented regarding any future changes to the sales tax structure� • Housing and Homelessness – The City will remain active in addressing the needs of the City’s homeless population with a primary focus on preventing and reducing the population of chronically homeless individuals by providing solutions that address the fundamental causes of homelessness and by supporting solutions that provide permanent housing options and required supportive services�
• CalPERS Investment Policy – The City has concerns with actions taken or proposed by the CalPERS Board and the State Legislature to divest from certain companies or industries to be “socially responsible”� These policy decisions come at the price of reduced market rates of return on pension plan investments� The pension funding requirement not covered by investment returns will be borne by the state and local governments, and ultimately California taxpayers� • Federal and State Funding for Parks and Library Projects – The City is interested in efforts to maintain or increase funding for these types of projects and improvements� The funding is critical for the City’s ability to upgrade and ensure access to the City’s parks, recreation, and library facilities including those that have been underserved� Advocate for changes to funding formulas to include per-capita opportunities for local governments� • Substance and Opioid Abuse Funding – The City supports legislation that increases funding levels for substance and opioid abuse programs and services that will help those who are addicted or abusing substances with overcoming their addiction� The addiction/abuse cycle has negative implications for our community and use of public safety resources� • Procurement Mandates – The City is concerned with any efforts that would create new procurement mandates for resources that do not fit the needs of our community or do not serve our customers in a reliable and affordable manner�
• Affordability – As more state policies are adopted and included as a component of electric rates, the City is concerned that it will become increasingly challenging to keep electric rates low� The City will continue to advocate for local control when approaching new policies that may result in rate increases�
Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session 22 • Electric Vehicles – The California Air Resources Board (CARB) recently approved a rule requiring 100 percent of all new cars sold in the state to be zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) by 2035� The regulation institutes interim targets of 35% ZEV sales by 2026, 68% by 2030 and 100% by 2035� This policy will create new, increased demand for electric vehicles in the foreseeable future and will call for electric utilities to be instrumental in electrifying the transportation sector� The City will continue to evaluate the electric system infrastructure and capacity needs to accommodate these targets on an ongoing basis while coordinating efforts related to transportation electrification among City departments� The City supports electric vehicle deployment as a means to foster safe and healthy communities and economic growth� • Funding/Grant Opportunities – The recently passed Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) collectively devote over $400 billion toward energy related funding and investments� Accordingly, the Department is seeking opportunities to receive grant funding as a result of this legislation passing� Grant funding opportunities may include bringing new technology online in Roseville; improving grid resiliency; hardening Information Technology (IT) systems; improving operations of City services; and facilitating the building and transportation electrification transition� The City will continue to monitor and engage in these opportunities as they become available� • Jurisdictional Concerns – Following recent wildfires, heatwaves and power supply shortages, the City is concerned that a statewide effort to address these events could lead to new oversight over publicly owned utilities (POUs) and additional limits to local control� The City will oppose legislation that creates new jurisdictional review over POUs or imposes new limits on our ability to make decisions at the local level�
• Grid Reliability Related Programs – During the 2022 legislative session, the Governor signed into law AB 205 (Budget Committee, Chapter 61, Statutes of 2022) to address energy reliability and resource concerns� The bill creates several new opportunities using both supply and demand-side measures to support reliable electric operations throughout the state� Specifically, AB 205 creates the Distributed Electricity Backup Assets (DEBA) Program, the Demand Side Grid Support (DSGS) Program, and the Strategic Reliability Reserve Program – all programs designed to bolster grid reliability, especially during extreme events� The Electric Department is following each of these efforts to understand what opportunities may be available for Roseville� In particular, the Department is tracking developments at the California Energy Commission related to the DSGS Program to understand if and how Roseville could participate in the program, and whether Roseville could model a similar program of its own in the future� Following the September 2022 heatwave, electric reliability will be a hot topic in the legislature during 2023� Engaging in each of these venues will be a priority for the Department� • Supply Chain Disruptions – The availability of essential electric equipment, including distribution transformers are in short supply� Inaction on this critical supply chain issue could affect state and federal electrification goals as well as other goals related to home building� Historically, an order for a transformer took the Electric Department 3 months to acquire� Now the same order could take up to 2 to 3 years to fulfill� The costs of these transformers have also increased significantly� The City is working closely with our trade associations to bring attention to this issue at the federal level and is urging the Secretary of Energy to prioritize Inflation Reduction Act Funds in coordination with the Defense Production Act to boost supply of these critical electric components� The Department will continue to engage and bring attention to these important issues with the hopes of increasing transformer supply availability� Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session 23 • Transportation Development Act – Continue to monitor Transportation Development Act legislation to ensure local control and funding use is not restricted further and oppose any proposed changes that would implement these types of restrictions� • Challenges with Legislation Mandating How Housing is Developed – The City has significant concerns with the continuing onslaught of legislation that is mandating how housing is developed in the state� This includes the elimination of control local governments have over land use, zoning, and permitting approvals� The sheer volume and breadth of legislation has required significant staff time and expense to track and implement� Moreover, while legislation continues to focus the responsibility for solving the State’s housing crisis on local governments, it neglects to provide the necessary tools to do so� Since the loss of redevelopment in California, local governments have been challenged to assist housing development in our communities� It is imperative that the state provide municipalities with new tools they can employ to meet the countless new housing requirements being imposed on them by the state� • Information Technology – Engagement in the Regulatory Process - Support the inclusion of language in legislation that ensures the participation of local governments in the process of developing new regulations and/or the process for implementing new state and federal requirements�
• Federal Funding for Transit – Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants require approval from the United States Department of Labor (USDOL)� USDOL recently determined that California’s Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) restricts agencies from bargaining in good faith with transit employees� As a result, FTA plans to withhold grant funds from Roseville Transit and other California transit agencies� This could impact over $3,600,000 in FTA COVID-19 relief funding programmed for Roseville Transit in FY22 and FY23� The City of Roseville will support efforts to overturn the USDOL and FTA decisions while maintaining PEPRA as an important tool to control local agency pension costs�
• Federal Funding for Active Transportation and Streets – The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans recently requested changes to the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Regional Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (RSTBGP) funding processes� Per regional funding agreements, CMAQ and RSTBGP are passed through to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency and distributed to local agencies by formula based upon population and (for RSTBGP only) maintained road miles� CMAQ funds average $1,300,000 annually and are used for qualifying bicycle, pedestrian and other projects that reduce emissions such as roundabouts� RSTBGP averages $1,500,000 annually and is one of the most flexible federal transportation funding programs as nearly all types of transportation projects are eligible, and in Roseville have been used for arterial road resurfacing� The City of Roseville does not support the proposal because we would lose local control and be required to participate in the Sacramento Area Council of Governments competitive funding program� Critical Concerns for the Upcoming Legislative/Congressional Session 24 • National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) updates and Community Rating System (CRS) program changes – The NFIP is insolvent, and with the increasing effort to make federal programs socially equitable and create environmental justice, FEMA is at crossroads with their NFIP and CRS programs�  FEMA recently released the “Risk Rating 2�0  - Equity in Action” flood insurance program in hopes of bringing greater solvency and stability; however, there are concerns that its complexity will frustrate policyholders, which historically leads to Congressional redirectives of the NFIP� The City has concerns that ongoing NFIP instability may lead to Congress terminating the NFIP and its subordinate CRS program, both of which have great value to Roseville residents, especially with Risk Rating 2�0 applying Roseville’s 45% CRS discount in all flood zones, as opposed to the previously applied discount only in high hazard zones�
• Pole Attachments/Communications Equipment – The City opposes any legislation that would further diminish local control over attachments on publicly-owned infrastructure and that would go beyond the current requirements or that would create alternative requirements that would conflict with exemptions granted to public providers under the Communications Act or would have negative implications on revenue recovery, aesthetics and most importantly, safety� • Ballot Initiatives – There is an ever increasing number of initiatives that qualify for the ballot during regular election cycles, which would have implications for local governments� Due to this trend, coupled with the increased involvement of special interest groups in the initiative process, the importance of educating the community and the Legislature on the implications an initiative may have on the operations and/or policies of a local government is critical� • Fentanyl – The ongoing fentanyl crisis continues to impact communities across California, the consequences of which are devastating� The City will prioritize support for legislation that increases accountability of those responsible for the sale and distribution of fentanyl, public awareness of the crisis, resources for law enforcement to address the impacts, and treatment and services for those addicted to this deadly substance�

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
2559
File #:
0709-02-1
Title:

HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL – Quarterly Status Update 4th Quarter 2022
Contact:

Suzi Cook-Turner 916-774-5414 [email protected] Trisha Isom 916-746-1239 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 3/1/2023
Item #: 6.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
The City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, is not required to take any action on this item. This quarterly report is for informational purposes only.

BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the bylaws of the Roseville Housing Authority (RHA), the City Council, acting as the governing board for the Housing Authority, holds its quarterly meeting the first Wednesday of March, June, September, and December, or as soon as possible thereafter. Staff has prepared the following status report regarding lease-up activity for the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program. The HCV Program provides income-qualified households in Roseville and Rocklin with rental assistance using funding from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This assistance is utilized at rental units that meet program specific housing standards, are owned by a willing property owner, and are within Roseville or Rocklin city limits. This rental assistance ensures that the household is able to afford to live in safe and decent housing. During the fourth quarter of 2022 there were 602 vouchers utilized in Roseville, 109 vouchers being utilized in Rocklin, and 2 in other jurisdictions (approved transfers out of the area) for a total of 713 families receiving rental assistance through RHA.

RHA is authorized to provide 813 households with HCV rental assistance. HUD awarded RHA 8 additional HCV vouchers bringing our total number of regular vouchers to 570. RHA also manages several special voucher programs including 50 Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHV) providing rental assistance to individuals and families who are experiencing homelessness or at risk of experiencing homelessness; 75 vouchers allocated specifically for families on the waiting list with a head-of-household or partner that are non-elderly and disabled (NED vouchers); and 43 Mainstream vouchers assist households who have a non-elderly head of household or partner with a disability and are transitioning out of institutional or other segregated settings, are currently homeless, or at risk of becoming homeless. RHA is also administering 30 Project-Based Vouchers (PBVs) at the Main Street and Roseville Apartments which remain 100% leased.

Roseville Housing Authority continues to apply for additional vouchers and administrative fees when award or NOFA applications are made available from HUD to Public Housing Authorities (PHAs). In September 2022 RHA applied for Stability Vouchers (SV) with a letter of support from the Placer County Continuum of Care (CoC) and is still awaiting notification. This is a new voucher program to help individuals and families who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, fleeing, or attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, and human trafficking. It will also serve veterans and families that include a veteran that meets one of the preceding criteria. RHA applied for additional VASH vouchers in September 2022 and was awarded 10 vouchers in December 2022 which brings our total to 85 vouchers for veteran households. Referrals for these vouchers are required to come from our partners at the Veterans Affairs Department (VA). In July 2022 RHA applied for Special HUD-VASH fees and is still awaiting notification from HUD on a monetary award. If awarded, these additional funds will assist in expansion of RHA's outreach to veterans and property owners.

RHA administers the Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS) which is a component of the HCV program and provides additional assistance to families who are working to become free of public assistance. RHA is collaborating with Placer County Housing Authority (PCHA) in running our FSS programs and updating the program. The collaboration includes building and sharing a new Program Coordinating Committee (PCC) made up of Placer County agencies and businesses to assist the housing authorities in securing commitments of public and private resources for operation of the FSS program. PCHA’s strong Placer County connection and RHA’s work with Roseville/Rocklin area resources has resulted in a newly formed, robust and active PCC which will assist participants in overcoming barriers they may encounter on their journey to self-sufficiency.

At the end of 2022 staff had leased 30 of the 50 EHV vouchers leased. HUD continues to express their pleasure with RHA’s leasing of this very challenging program. Staff continues to attend bimonthly meetings to work with the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras and referring agencies to address the many barriers to housing that continue to exist for the recipients of EHV vouchers. EHV vouchers were a special voucher type to assist eligible households experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. Per HUD, EHV vouchers have a deadline for issuance of September 30, 2023 after which RHA will no longer be able to issue this special voucher type.

Each housing authority is required to be at least 95% leased-up for its voucher allocation or utilizing at least 95% of its annual budget authority to remain in compliance with HUD’s requirements. The lease-up rate for a calendar year cannot exceed 100% of its allocation of vouchers (per voucher type), and/or 100% expenditure of its annual budget allocation for the program. Agencies leasing up or expending 98% or more of its allocated vouchers and/or budget can reach high-performing status. RHA continues to meet HUD program requirements for high- performing status through 100% expenditure of its annual budget allocation. The attached table provides a monthly summary of RHA’s voucher programs for the CY of 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
This Housing Authority Quarterly Status Report does not create any additional cost to the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Roseville Housing Authority Quarterly Report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community.

Goal D - Enhance economic vitality.

Respectfully Submitted,
Suzi Cook-Turner, Housing Supervisor
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Roseville Housing Authority Voucher Lease-up CY 2022
RHA Quarterly Newsletter
Roseville Housing Authority Voucher Lease-up CY 2022
Actual Lease-
up of
Mainstream
12-HUD
Mainstream
(33)
Jan-22 542 562 69 75 58 75 30 33 3 50
Feb-22 544 562 67 75 57 75 28 33 11 50
Mar-22 538 562 67 75 58 75 28 33 12 50
Apr-22 533 562 74 75 59 75 26 33 11 50
May-22 535 562 72 75 56 75 26 33 14 50
Jun-22 533 562 74 75 58 75 27 33 19 50
Jul-22 531 562 75 75 56 75 27 33 19 50
Aug-22 528 562 75 75 58 75 25 33 25 50
Sep-22 523 562 73 75 56 75 26 43 25 50
Oct-22 520 570 75 75 56 75 26 43 25 50
Nov-22 516 570 75 75 57 75 30 43 30 50
Dec-22 528 570 74 75 57 75 32 43 30 50
YTD Total 6371 6768 870 900 686 900 331 436 224 600
YED % Leased
Actual
Lease-up
of VASH
11-HUD
VASH (75)
Actual Lease-
up of EHV
21-HUD
Emergency
Housing
Vouchers
(EHVs) (50)

94.1% 96.7% 76.2% 75.9% 37.3%
2022
Actual
Lease-up
of Regular
10-HUD
Regular
(562)
Actual
Lease-up
of Non-
Elderly
Disabled
5-HUD Non-
Elderly
Disabled
(75)
In the Spotlight: Family Self-Sufficiency
Program (FSS) GRADUATE, Selena!
In November one of RHA’s participants completed the FSS Program and due to all of her hard work and dedication
to her FSS Contract, was awarded over $30,000!
The FSS Program rewards individuals for working by
creating an interest earning savings account in their
name. When the participant’s portion of the rent
increases due to their increase in wages, RHA deposits
the difference in the savings account.

After the 5 year contract* is over, the participant is
rewarded with the amount in the savings account no
matter what the amount and can use the money for
whatever they need or want.
*Participant must meet contract goals.

January 2023
Roseville Housing
Authority Newsletter
Roseville Housing Authority
316 Vernon St., Ste 150
Roseville, CA 95678
916 774-5270
916 746-1295 (fax)
roseville.ca.us /housing
What is the FSS Program?m!
The FSS program can help you build a more stable
financial future. As your income from work increases,
your rent increase is saved in an escrow account that
you’ll receive when you successfully complete the
program. FSS is a five-year program.

Check out the Roseville Housing
Authority’s Facebook page for the
Family Self-Sufficiency Program.

Scan the code to find out more!
No home is complete without a first-aid kit:

If you do not have a first-aid kit, take a few moments to assemble one today.

Be sure to include the following items:

Portability how-to:

Portability is the ability to take your voucher and
move from one Housing Authority’s jurisdiction
to another. You can exercise this option to any
jurisdiction within the United States.

Contact your Housing technician when considering
portability. To see if you qualify, you must:
• Live or work in the Roseville Housing
Authority’s jurisdiction for 1 year
• Pay off any debt you may owe the Roseville
Housing Authority
• Not be in the initial term of your lease, unless
the owner agrees to break the lease
If you have further questions, feel free to call the
Roseville Housing Authority at (916) 774-5270.

Roseville Housing Authority
Monday
9 a.m. – 3 p.m.

Tuesday – Thursday
9 a.m. – 5 p.m.

Friday
8 a.m. – noon
Closed every day from
noon – 1 p.m. for lunch
211 Placer
Free, Confidential,
Multilingual, Available 24/7
Dial 2-1-1 • TTY:
1- 833 - D IAL 211
Text your zip code
to 898211
Your text plan’s rates will apply
211Placer.org
Project Sentinel
Providing Housing
Solutions and Community
Mediation since 1976.

Call (888) 324-7268 or email
[email protected]
for help with:

Housing Discrimination,
Tenant-Landlord Dispute
Resolution, and Housing
Counseling Programs
AffordableHousing.com
Search for available units,
connect with property
owners, apply for public
housing assistance and
manage your waiting
list applications – all
in one place.

Plus, it’s FREE to sign up!
Placer Food Bank
Get Food Assistance,
Volunteer, Donate
Providing hunger relief
to Placer, El Dorado and
Nevada Counties.

For information, visit
placerfoodbank.org
or call (916) 783-0481.
• Adhesive bandages and sterile
gauze pads in assorted sizes
• First-aid tape to hold on
the gauze pads
• An instant cold pack for
bumps and bruises
• Antiseptic wipes to clean
cuts and scrapes
• Tweezers to remove small splinters
• Non-prescription medicine
such as aspirin, non-aspirin pain
reliever and antacid