Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Roseville City Council
August 16, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 16, 2023
Body
Roseville City Council
Pages
44
Original file
165.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on rosevilleca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: 2023 Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Mitigation Fee Update – Professional Services Agreement
Project Location(s): City of Roseville (Placer County) CA Project Description: The project authorizes the preparation of an update to the Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Mitigation Fee. The fee update study will make a recommendation to update the drainage fees that are collected to mitigate the downstream stormwater volume impact resulting from development in Roseville as part of a long-term program, as well as update the study’s hydrologic methodologies since the fee’s last update in 2018. As part of the contract for the fee study update, the consultant would prepare a preliminary planning-level study to determine potential future flood mitigation needs. Additional facilities are not included in the City’s current mitigation plans, and as a result, if the assessment recommends additional facilities, or increases to currently approved facilities, these would require additional design, study, and consideration before they could be approved. Any additional or projects larger in scale that what has already been evaluated would require additional CEQA analysis, though the current assessment is considered a preliminary planning level study, which is exempt from CEQA.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department Reason why this Project is Exempt: The project includes two components. The first is the 2023 Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Mitigation Fee Update, which is Statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15273 because it involves the modification and/or restructuring of rates by a public agency for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. CEQA states the following:
“CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of: (a) (4) Obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas…”
The second component is a preliminary assessment into the potential for possible future flood control facilities, which are only being considered for feasibility at this time. Therefore, this component is Statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15262 because the project only authorizes feasibility and planning studies at this time. Following completion of this assessment, if determined appropriate, staff will refine the project proposal and conduct CEQA review prior to project approval. CEQA states:
“A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. This section does not apply to the adoption of a plan that will have a legally binding effect on later activities.”

Approval of the 2023 Pleasant Grove/Curry Creek Watershed Mitigation Fee Update is considered Statutorily exempt from CEQA (State CEQA Guidelines section 15273 and 15262). The project involves the modification and/or restructuring of rates by a public agency for the purpose of obtaining funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas In addition, a preliminary planning-level assessment of the potential need for future flood control facilities will be completed, and if it is determined that a new project should move forward, additional CEQA analysis will be done prior to approval.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Brian Walker, City Floodplain Manager/Senior Engineer, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678 (916) 746-1300.

Signature: Date: 8/2/2023
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator,
City of Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2884
File #: 0323
Title: Opposition to the Release of a Sexually Violent Predator Contact: Troy Bergstrom 916-774-5058 [email protected] Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution opposing the release of William Stephenson, a Sexually Violent Predator, into the incorporated areas of South Placer County, and approving a letter to be sent to Liberty Healthcare for submission to the Department of State Hospitals and the Placer County Superior Court.

BACKGROUND
William Robert Stephenson (“Stephenson”) is a “Sexually Violent Predator” who has been committed for an indeterminate term to the custody of the Department of State Hospitals for treatment. Under California law, a “Sexually Violent Predator” is defined as an individual who has been convicted of a sexually violent crime against one or more persons and has been diagnosed with a mental disorder that makes the individual a danger to the health and safety of others because it is likely the individual will commit sexually violent criminal behavior without treatment in custody.

On about January 20, 2022, a Judge for the Placer County Superior Court (“Court”) ordered the conditional release of Stephenson from the Department of State Hospitals to outpatient treatment and supervision. On about July 17, 2023, a Judge for the Court granted a petition allowing Stephenson to be released with “Transient Status”, whereby Stephenson would be released to a trailer or recreational vehicle to a location in Placer County that has yet to be determined but without a designated address. The Court also scheduled a hearing for September 1, 2023, to consider the specific location of the trailer or recreational vehicle.

On about July 27, 2023, the Department of State Hospitals issued a notice regarding the potential placement of Stephenson in Placer County. The issuance of the notice allows agencies within Placer County to provide written comments regarding Stephenson’s impending release, location, and conditions of release. These comments are submitted to the treatment provider, Liberty Healthcare, and are then submitted to the Department of State Hospitals and the Court.

For multiple reasons, the release and placement of Stephenson into the incorporated areas of South Placer County (including the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln) is not appropriate.

The incorporated areas of South Placer County and particularly, the City of Roseville, are the most densely populated areas of the County and have the highest percentages of underage individuals.

These growing communities are also home to numerous parks, schools, and other places where children gather. Stephenson was conditionally released in 2014 and placed in the City of Roseville, but quickly violated the conditions of his release and re-offended by possessing sexually explicit materials involving children. Additionally, the City of Roseville prohibits camping on public property and prohibits long-term parking of RVs and trailers on any street, alley, or public parking facility. If Stephenson were to be released to a trailer and placed within the City of Roseville, he would be in immediate violation of the Roseville Municipal Code and subject to code enforcement efforts and penalties.

For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution opposing the release and placement of Stephenson into the incorporated areas of South Placer County, including anywhere within the geographic boundaries of the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln. Adopting the resolution also approves the attached comment letter to Liberty Healthcare.

This letter providers further details as to why the City of Roseville is not a suitable placement for Stephenson, and if approved, will be sent by Staff to Liberty Healthcare for submission to the Department of State Hospitals and the Placer County Superior Court.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed action.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute Section 21065 and CEQA State Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) and Section 15378. The proposed resolution meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B – Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E – Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Travis Cochran, Deputy City Attorney
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-346
Attachment A - Letter to Liberty Healthcare
RESOLUTION NO. 23-346

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE OPPOSING THE

RELEASE OF A SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR INTO THE INCORPORATED AREAS

OF SOUTH PLACER COUNTY
WHEREAS, under California law, a “Sexually Violent Predator” is defined as an individual who has been convicted of a sexually violent crime against one or more persons and has been diagnosed with a mental disorder that makes the individual a danger to the health and safety of others because it is likely the individual will commit sexually violent criminal behavior without treatment in custody; and
WHEREAS, William Robert Stephenson (“Stephenson”) had been convicted of violations of Penal Code § 220, Assault With Intent to Commit a Specific Sex Offense; Penal Code § 289(a), Sexual Penetration of a Victim With Foreign Object By Force; and Penal Code § 288a(c)(2), Oral Copulation By Force Or Fear, and had been committed for an indeterminate term to the custody of the Department of State Hospitals as a Sexually Violent Predator; and WHEREAS, on or around January 20, 2022, a Judge for the Placer County Superior Court ordered the conditional release of Stephenson from the Department of State Hospitals and into the community for receipt of outpatient treatment; and WHEREAS, on or around July 17, 2023, a Judge for the Placer County Superior Court granted a petition allowing Stephenson to be released with “Transient Status”, whereby Stephenson would be released to a trailer or recreational vehicle to a location in Placer County that has yet to be determined but without a designated address; and WHEREAS, Stephenson was previously conditionally released into the City of Roseville in 2014; and
WHEREAS, on or around May 19, 2017, while on conditional release, Stephenson was arrested and subsequently charged with violation of Penal Code § 311.11(b), Possession of Obscene Matter of a Minor, a felony; and
WHEREAS, Stephenson’s violation of Penal Code § 311.11(b) and his associated internet use and browser search history violated the terms of his conditional release; and WHEREAS, a key role of a municipality is to protect the health and safety of its residents and community members; and
WHEREAS, the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln represent approximately sixtyseven percent (67%) of the entire population of Placer County; and WHEREAS, the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln represent only six percent (6%) of the total land area of Placer County; and
WHEREAS, approximately twenty-four percent (24%) of the population of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln are under the age of 18; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that release of a Sexually Violent Predator in the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, or Lincoln, which represent the most dense urban populations with high percentages of underage individuals, is inappropriate; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that release of Stephenson, a Sexually Violent Predator who has previously been conditionally released and subsequently reoffended by possessing obscene materials involving minors, into the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, or Lincoln is contrary to the public’s health and safety; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council vehemently opposes the release of Stephenson into the incorporated area of South Placer County, including anywhere within the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, and Lincoln; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the letter attached hereto as Attachment “A”, and directs City staff to send the letter to Liberty Healthcare for submission to the Department of State Hospitals and the Placer County Superior Court; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that staff may take additional actions as may be directed by the City Manager and the City Attorney in furtherance of opposing the release of Stephenson into the cities of Roseville, Rocklin, or Lincoln.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
Phone (916) 774-5362 • Fax (916) 774-5485 • TDD (916) 774-5220 • [email protected] • www.roseville.ca.us August 16, 2023
Melissa Bagwell, Psy.D.

SVP CONREP Community Program Director
Liberty Healthcare
Re: Opposition to Placement of SVP William Stephenson in the City of Roseville Dear Dr. Bagwell:

Please accept this letter in response to the 6609.1 Notification Letter, dated July 27, 2023, regarding the conditional release of William Robert Stephenson, a Sexually Violent Predator (“SVP”). For the reasons set forth below, the City of Roseville (“City”) strongly opposes the release of Stephenson to a location within the geographic boundaries of the City.

Living in a Mobile Vehicle or RV is Not Permitted
It is the City’s understanding that the current Court-approved placement plan is that Stephenson be released as a “Transient” and that he live in a parked RV or mobile vehicle. The specific location of the parked RV or mobile vehicle has yet to be determined. This type of arrangement is not permitted within the City, as camping and/or leaving a vehicle in the same spot for over 72 hours is prohibited. Pursuant to Chapter 10.56 of the Roseville Municipal Code, it is illegal to camp upon any public property even if within a trailer, motorhome, RV, or other mobile vehicle.

Public property includes all streets, parks, City easements, creekbeds, parking lots, and open space areas. Similarly, Roseville Municipal Code section 11.20.020 prohibits any vehicle (including RVs and trailers) from being parked or left on any street, alley, or in any public parking facility within the City for a period of 72 hours or more.

Based on the information available to date, it appears that the current proposed plan for Stephenson’s release would automatically violate the City’s Municipal Code if Stephenson is placed within the City. Moreover, such violations accrue on a day-to-day basis, meaning Stephenson would be charged with a separate and distinct offense for each and every day the prohibited camping or parking occurs. Each violation is chargeable as an administrative citation, infraction, or misdemeanor. There are other incorporated and unincorporated areas within Placer County, however, that do not prohibit this conduct, and even some that have programs for housing unsheltered individuals in trailers. If Stephenson is to be placed in a mobile vehicle or RV, it only makes sense that he be placed in a location where he is not in immediate violation of the law and subject to daily code enforcement efforts and penalties.

The City is Densely Populated and Encompasses Many Parks, Schools, and Children The City’s estimated population as of July 1, 2022, is 154,817. While this represents roughly 37% of the total population of Placer County, the City represents only 3% of the total land area of City Council
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678
Placer County. The City has nearly 80 parks, and encompasses approximately 31 K-12 schools and 34 licensed preschools. Some additional parks and schools are already planned or being designed, and it is anticipated that several more schools and parks will be necessary to accommodate the City’s continued growth. Moreover, the percentages of persons within the City that are under 18 years of age and under 5 years of age are among the highest of the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Placer County.

Given the residency restrictions of Penal Code section 3003.5 and Welfare & Institutions Code section 6608.5, placement of Stephenson in a compliant area within the City will be challenging.

Placement becomes even more difficult considering that many of the less dense or currently undeveloped areas within the City are scheduled for development, including the many additional parks and schools that will be necessary to support new homes. Further, it is simply not appropriate and is contrary to public safety to release – even conditionally – a Sexually Violent Predator into the most densely populated area with the largest populations of minors and children.

Stephenson Re-Offended While on Conditional Release Within the City In approximately 2014, Stephenson was conditionally released from commitment and was placed in a residence within the City. While the City is not aware of the specific conditions of Stephenson’s release, it is our understanding that such conditions usually include measures designed to monitor one’s whereabouts and to limit access to sexually explicit materials. This may include GPS location monitoring, prohibiting explicit materials and pornography, limited access to the internet, supervision of all media use, being truthful with the treatment provider, not using software or other programs or devices that hide or delete internet usage or browser history, and consenting to searches of personal computers and other media devices.

During searches conducted by Liberty Healthcare of Stephenson’s computer and home in March 2017, it was discovered that Stephenson was researching various ways to browse the internet without his browsing history being recorded or tracked, and other ways to potentially bypass supervised use of his media. He was untruthful with his healthcare provider regarding several “Rated R” movies that had been downloaded to his computer and he was untruthful about his access of various sites that allow peer-to-peer media sharing. Stephenson then consented to a forensic search of his computer, which was conducted by the Roseville Police Department.

Forensic exam of Stephenson’s computer showed multiple uses of computer software, programs, and/or services that help hide internet activity and prevent users from being tracked by law enforcement. The forensic exam also revealed access to pornographic sites and over 50 pornographic images, including images of sexually explicit material involving children.

Stephenson was then arrested and charged for violating Penal Code section 311.11, subsection (d), Possession of Obscene Matter of a Minor.

Stephenson has already been released in Roseville, and he promptly violated the terms of his release and committed a felony. Stephenson, himself, has demonstrated that Roseville is not an appropriate place for his release and that he cannot be successful in this community, and the City lacks the resources to become Stephenson’s private watchdog. Stephenson should be placed in an area where he has fewer distractions and temptations so that he has a greater chance of successful treatment and a lower chance of recidivism. Based on Stephenson’s past actions and his failures in our City, his best chance of successful treatment and recovery is through placement in some other location.

Our City recognizes the difficult nature of this situation and the legal constraints imposed upon the Court for release of a Sexually Violent Predator, and that the reality of the situation is that no community will be pleased to have such an individual placed in their midst. However, the City has an obligation to its residents to inform Liberty Healthcare, the Department of State Hospitals, and the Court as to why Stephenson’s placement within the City of Roseville is improper and at odds with public safety. Here, camping and extended parking of mobile vehicles or RVs is prohibited within the City, and the current placement plan would place Stepheson in immediate violations of the City’s Municipal Code. The City is also densely populated, with many parks, schools, and higher proportions of children. Stephenson had an opportunity here when he was previously conditionally released but violated those conditions and re-offended by possessing sexually explicit materials involving children. The City of Roseville is simply not an appropriate location for placement of William Stephenson, and for these reasons, the City strongly opposes any placement of Stephenson in our community.

Sincerely,
___________________________________ ___________________________________ Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt Vice Mayor Krista Bernasconi
___________________________________ ___________________________________ Councilmember Scott Alvord Councilmember Pauline Roccucci ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Councilmember Tracy Mendonsa Dominick Casey, City Manager ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Troy Bergstrom, Chief of Police

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2853
File #: 0900-04-01
Title: 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project - Notice of Completion Contact: Joe Arino 916-774-5464 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project:

Replaced failed sections of asphalt roadway pavement; and Resurfaced with microsurfacing; and
Reconstructed Curb Ramps to comply with American with Disabilities (ADA) requirements; and
Replaced signal detector loops at various locations throughout the City.

The streets included in the project were portions of (see attached map for locations): Cirby Way, Pleasant Grove Blvd., Douglas Blvd., S. Cirby Way, Rocky Ridge Dr., and Old Auburn Rd.

The Public Works Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project and has found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications and is now ready for acceptance. As required by the Specifications and Faithful Performance Bond, the Contractor shall guarantee the installation of all improvements for a period of 12 months from the date of the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded by FY2020-21 General Fund year-end surplus resources and the Highway Users Tax (HUT) Fund. The final accounting of project costs is ongoing and is currently estimated at $4,400,000 from the General Fund and $1,400,000 from the HUT Fund. This is within the approved project budget and no additional resources are required.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Acceptance of the 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project as complete meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Joe Arino, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-328
NOC
Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-328
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE 2021 GENERAL FUND ARTERIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND

AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. [
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 500
Feet
Exhibit A - 2021 General Fund Arterial Resurfacing Project Public Works - Engineering
S:\Arcdata\publicworks\GIS\CIP\Project_Area_Maps\Projects_2022\Projects_2022.aprx Date Saved: 2/10/2022 9:23 AM 2021 Arterial Resurfacing

WASHINGTON BL

FIDDYMENT RD
F
O
O
T
HIL
L
S
B
L
WILLS
RD

TAYLOR RD

WESTBROOK BL
R
O
C
KY
R
DI G
E
D
R
E

ROSEVILLE
PW

PLEASANT

GROVE BL

N SUNRISE
AV

HARDING BL

FOOTHILLS BL

DOUGLAS BL

BLUE OAKS BL

VERNON ST

EUREKA RD
OAK
ST

ROSEVILLE PW

OAKS BL

WOODCREEK

WASHINGTON BL

ROSEVILLE RD
S CIRB
WY
Y

BLUE OAKS BL

AUBURN BL

STANFORD
RANCH
RD

JUNCTION BL

RIVERSIDE AV
N

SUNRISE AV
EUREKA
RD

ATLANTIC
ST

PLEASANT

GROVE BL

ATKINSON ST
OLD

AUBURN RD

CIRBY WY GALLERIA BL

BASELINE RD

DOUGLAS BL

JUNCTION

BL ATLANTIC
ST
VISTA

GRANDE BL

FAIRWAY DR SUNRISE AV

SECRET RAVINE PW

WESTBROOK
BL
VISTA

GRANDE BL

FAIRWAY DR

WESTBROOK BL

ROSEVILLE PW

WOODCREEK

OAKS BL
BLUE

OAKS BL

JUNCTION BL

PASS RD
PAGEL
SIE
R
RA
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
B
L
HWY 65
I80 W
HWY 65 S
HWY 65 N
I80 E

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2880
File #: 0400-09-01
Title:

Community Facilities District No. 4 (Public Services), Annexation No. 9 (1028 Main Street Subdivision) - Intention to Annex Territory
Contact: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory to Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 4 (Public Services) and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein, and set Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:00 p.m., in the Roseville Civic Center, Council Chambers at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, as the time and place to conduct a public hearing.

BACKGROUND
On March 23, 2023 the Planning Commission approved the developer's request for a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide a 2.5-acre parcel into ten (10) single family residential lots. Per the conditions of approval, the subject property shall be annexed into the existing infill CFD No. 4 prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, for the purpose of covering the costs of the ongoing maintenance obligations. The List of Authorized Services can be found in the attached documents. Parcels within this subdivision will be assigned the maximum tax rate associated within Tax Zone 2 of the Rate and Method of Apportionment, also attached.

FISCAL IMPACT
The annexation of property into infill CFD No. 4 will not impact the City's General Fund.

The property owners will pay a special tax, sufficient to pay the maintenance costs of the CFD, to be levied annually on the parcels of real property within the CFD.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Adoption of the resolution described herein meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeannine Thrash, Management Analyst
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-344
RMA and List ofAuthorized Services
Proposed Boundary Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-344

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY

FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES

THEREIN

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Community Facilities District No. 4
(Public Services)
Annexation No. 9 (1028 Main Street Subdivision)
RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of Roseville (the “City”), County of Placer, State of California, that:

WHEREAS, this Council has conducted proceedings to establish Community Facilities District No. 4 (Public Services) (the “CFD”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing at Section 53311, of the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, under the Act, this Council, as the legislative body for the CFD, is empowered with the authority to annex territory to the CFD, and now desires to undertake proceedings to annex territory to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Findings. This Council hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that territory be added to the CFD.

2. Territory Described. The name of the existing CFD is “City of Roseville Community Facilities District No. 4 (Public Services).” The territory originally included in the existing CFD is set forth in the map of the CFD heretofore recorded in the Placer County Recorder’s Office on May 3, 2005, in Book 3 at Page 50 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts, to which map reference is hereby made, as such map has been supplemented in connection with subsequent annexations.

The territory now proposed to be annexed to the CFD is as shown on the Annexation Map for the captioned Annexation No. 9 (1028 Main Street Subdivision) to the CFD, on file with the Clerk, the boundaries of which territory are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause to be recorded such Annexation Map, showing the territory to be annexed, in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Placer within 15 days of the date of adoption of this resolution.

3. The Services. The types of public services financed by the CFD and pursuant to the Act consist of those public services (the “Services”) as described in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Formation with respect to the CFD adopted by the Council as Resolution No. 05-227 on May 18, 2005 (the “Resolution of Formation”). It is presently intended that the Services will be

Page 2 ends

provided, without preference or priority, to the existing territory in the CFD and the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD.

4. Special Tax. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the CFD to pay for the Services, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof is intended to be levied annually within the CFD, and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes.

The special tax proposed to pay for Services to be supplied within the territory proposed to be annexed will be equal to the special taxes levied to pay for the same Services in the CFD, except that a higher or lower tax may be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed or to be annexed in the future to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services in that territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services in the CFD.

The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the CFD, as now in existence and following the annexation proposed herein, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in the Resolution of Formation.

5. Hearing. Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the City Council Chambers, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, be, and the same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Council, as legislative body for the CFD, will conduct a public hearing on the matters described in this Resolution.

6. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the CFD, including the area to be annexed to the CFD. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least 7 days before the date herein set for said hearing. The City Clerk may also cause a copy of such notice and a copy of this Resolution to be mailed to each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed, which notice and resolution shall be mailed at least 15 days before the date of said hearing. Such notice shall be substantially in the form specified in Section 53339.4 of the Act, with a summary form specifically authorized.

7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. * * * * * *

Page 3 ends

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Roseville, California, at a regularly scheduled meeting thereof, held on the _ day of __________ , 2023 by the following vote of the CityCouncil:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Roseville

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 4
(PUBLIC SERVICES)

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
A Special Tax applicable to each Assessor’s Parcel in Community Facilities District No. 4 (Public Services) [herein “CFD No. 4”] shall be levied and collected according to the tax liability determined by the City Council, acting in its capacity as the legislative body of CFD No. 4, through the application of the appropriate Special Tax rate, as described below. All of the property in CFD No. 4, unless exempted by law or by the provisions of Section E below, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent, and in the manner herein provided, including property subsequently annexed to CFD No. 4 unless a separate Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax is adopted for the annexation area.

A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Acreage” or “Acre” means the land area making up an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final subdivision map or other parcel map recorded at the County Recorder’s Office.
“Administrative Expenses” means the costs incurred by the City to determine, levy and collect the Special Tax, including salaries of City employees and fees of consultants and the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes upon the general tax rolls; preparation of required reports, and any other costs required to administer the CFD as determined by the Finance Director.
“Administrator” means the person or firm designated by the City to administer the Special Taxes according to this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax. “Annual Tax Escalation Factor” means an annual increase in the Maximum Special Tax following the Base Year in an amount not to exceed four percent (4%). “Assessor’s Parcel” or “Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor’s Parcel number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the County Assessor designating parcels by Assessor’s Parcel number.
“Authorized Services” means the public services authorized to be funded by CFD No. 4 as set forth in the documents adopted by the City Council when the CFD was formed. “Base Year” means Fiscal Year 2005-06.
“City” means the City of Roseville.
“City Council” means the City Council of the City of Roseville, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 4.
“County” means the County of Placer.
“Developed Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels of Taxable Property for which a use permit or building permit for new construction of a residential or non-residential structure was issued prior to June 30 of the preceding Fiscal Year. “Finance Director” means the Finance Director for the City of Roseville or his or her designee. “Fiscal Year” means the period starting on July 1 and ending on the following June 30. “Land Use Class” means, for a particular Parcel, Non-Residential Property, Multi-Family Property, Single Family Detached Property, or Single Family Attached Property. “Maximum Special Tax” means the maximum Special Tax determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied on Taxable Property in any Fiscal Year. “Multi-Family Property” means any Parcel of Developed Property for which a building permit or use permit has been issued for construction of a residential structure with Units that are offered for rent to the general public.
“Non-Residential Property” means any Parcel of Developed Property within CFD No. 4 that is not Multi-Family Property, Single Family Detached Residential Property, or Single Family Attached Property.
“Public Property” means any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 4 that is owned by the federal government, State of California, County, City, or other public agency. “Single Family Attached Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels in CFD No. 4 for which a building permit was issued for construction of a residential structure consisting of two or more Units that share common walls and are offered as for-sale Units, including such residential structures that meet the statutory definition of a condominium contained in Civil Code Section 1351.
“Single Family Detached Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Parcels in CFD No. 4 for which a building permit was issued for construction of a Unit that does not share a common wall with another Unit.
“Special Tax Requirement” means the amount of revenue needed in any Fiscal Year to pay for the following: (i) Authorized services, maintenance expenses, sinking fund payments and capital reserves authorized to be funded by CFD No. 4, (ii) Administrative Expenses, (iii) amounts needed to cure any delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes which have occurred or (based on delinquency rates in prior years) may be expected to occur in the Fiscal Year in which the tax will be collected.
“Special Tax” means any tax levied pursuant to the Act on property within CFD No. 4. “Taxable Property” means all Assessor’s Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 4 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section F below. “Taxable Public Property” means, in any Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels in CFD No. 4 that had, in prior Fiscal Years, been taxed as Developed Property and subsequently came under the ownership of a Public Agency.
“Tax Zone” means one of the twenty-eight (28) mutually exclusive tax zones identified in Attachment 1 of this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, as may be updated to include new Parcels added to the CFD as a result of future annexations (which may be noncontiguous with Parcels already in the Tax Zone).
“Unit” means an individual single-family detached unit or an individual residential unit within a duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhome, condominium, or apartment structure. “Undeveloped Property” means all Parcels of Taxable Property within the boundaries of CFD No. 4 that are not Developed Property, as determined by the Administrator.

B. DATA COLLECTION FOR ANNUAL TAX LEVY
Each Fiscal Year, the Administrator shall identify the current Assessor’s Parcel number for all Parcels of Taxable Property within CFD No. 4 and shall determine within which Tax Zone each Assessor’s Parcel is located. Upon each annexation of property into CFD No. 4, the Administrator shall update Attachment 1 to include the new Assessor’s Parcel number(s).

Based on review of building permit records for property within the CFD, each Parcel shall be categorized as either Developed Property or Undeveloped Property for purposes of levying the Special Tax pursuant to Section E below. For Single Family Attached Property or Multi-Family Property, the number of Units shall be determined by referencing the condominium plan, apartment plan, site plan or other development plan for the property.

If a Parcel in the CFD is rezoned prior to such Parcel becoming Developed Property, the City may in its sole discretion, move the Parcel to a different Tax Zone based on the new Land Use Class that can be developed on the Parcel after the rezone. If a Parcel rezones after the Parcel has been taxed as Developed Property in prior Fiscal Years, the City can either continue to apply the Maximum Special Tax to the Parcel that had applied prior to the rezone or, in the City’s sole discretion, allow for the Parcel to be moved to a different Tax Zone based on the Land Use Class that will be allowed after the rezone is approved.

C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX
The following Maximum Special Tax rates apply to all Parcels of Developed Property within CFD No. 4:

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
(FISCAL YEAR 2005-06, REVISED 2006-07) *
Tax Zone
Maximum Special Tax
(Fiscal Year 2005-06) *
1 $ 50 per Unit
2 $ 75 per Unit
3 $ 100 per Unit
4 $ 125 per Unit
5 $ 150 per Unit
6 $ 175 per Unit
7 $ 200 per Unit
8 $ 225 per Unit
9 $ 250 per Unit
10 $ 275 per Unit
11 $ 300 per Unit
12 $ 350 per Unit
13 $ 375 per Unit
14 $ 250 per Acre
15 $ 350 per Acre
16 $ 475 per Acre
17 $ 600 per Acre
18 $ 750 per Acre
19 $ 850 per Acre
20 $ 1,000 per Acre
21 $ 1,050 per Acre
22 $ 1,500 per Acre
23 $ 2,000 per Acre
24 $ 2,500 per Acre
25 $ 3,000 per Acre
26 $ 3,500 per Acre
27 $ 4,000 per Acre
28 $ 4,500 per Acre
29 $ 5,000 per Acre
30 $ 5,500 per Acre
31 $ 6,000 per Acre
* Beginning July 1, 2006 and each July 1 thereafter, all of the Maximum Special Taxes shown in Table 1 above shall be adjusted by applying the Annual Tax Escalation Factor.

D. METHOD OF LEVY AND COLLECTION OF SPECIAL TAX
Each Fiscal Year, the Special Tax shall be levied as follows until the amount of the levy equals the Special Tax Requirement for that Fiscal Year:

First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax determined for each category of Developed Property within each Tax Zone until the amount levied is equal to the Special Tax Requirement for the Fiscal Year.

Second: If additional revenue is needed after the first step has been completed, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Taxable Public Property up to 100% of the Maximum Special Tax that had applied to the Parcel prior to the Parcel becoming Public Property until the amount levied is equal to the Special Tax Requirement for the Fiscal Year.

The Special Tax for CFD No. 4 shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes provided, however, that the City may (under the authority of Government Code Section 53340) collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet CFD No. 4 financial obligations and the Special Tax shall be equally subject to foreclosure if delinquent.

E. LIMITATIONS
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax, no Special Tax shall be levied on Public Property that is not Taxable Public Property.

F. INTERPRETATION OF SPECIAL TAX FORMULA
The City reserves the right to make minor administrative and technical changes to this document that does not materially affect the rate and method of apportioning the Special Taxes. In addition, the interpretation and application of any section of this document shall be left to the City’s discretion. Interpretations may be made by the City by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.

ATTACHMENT 1

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES
(FISCAL YEAR 2005-06, REVISED 2006-07) *

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
Tax Zone
Maximum Special Tax
(Fiscal Year 2005-06) *
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16 017-250-005 (017-117-007,011,014) 71 ac
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

ATTACHMENT 2

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
ANNEXATION NO. 5 (OLD AUBURN RANCH)
Tax Zone
Assessor's Parcels
Included in Tax
Zone*
Proposed
Units
Fiscal Year in
Which APN was
Added to CFD No. 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 467-090-002-000 32 2015/16
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

ATTACHMENT 3

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
ANNEXATION NO. 6 (FOOTHILLS AMERICAN DREAM)
Tax Zone
Assessor's Parcels
Included in Tax
Zone*
Proposed
Units
Fiscal Year in
Which APN was
Added to CFD No. 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 475-050-019-000 62 2016/2017
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

ATTACHMENT 4

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
ANNEXATION NO. 7 (THE VILLAGES AT KIT CARSON)
Tax Zone
Assessor's Parcels
Included in Tax
Zone*
Proposed
Units
Fiscal Year in
Which APN was
Added to CFD No. 4
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 048-350-015-000;
048-350-016-000;
048-350-018-000;
048-350-021-000;
048-350-022-000 21 2019/20
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

ATTACHMENT 5

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
ANNEXATION NO. 8 (415 EAST STREET SUBDIVISION)
Tax Zone
Assessor's Parcels
Included in Tax
Zone*
Proposed
Units
Fiscal Year in
Which APN was
Added to CFD No. 4
1 2
3 4 013-030-009-000 10 2020/21
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

ATTACHMENT 6

MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES

IDENTIFICATION OF TAX ZONES
ANNEXATION NO. 9 (1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION)
Tax Zone
Assessor's Parcels
Included in Tax
Zone*
Proposed
Units
Fiscal Year in
Which APN was
Added to CFD No. 4
1 2 015-080-030-000 10 2023/24
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 The property identified by the APNs listed above shall remain part of the identified Tax Zone regardless of changes in the configuration of the Assessor's Parcels or changes to Assessor's Parcel numbers in future Fiscal Years.

EXHIBIT B

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
COMMUNTIY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 4
(Services District)

LIST OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES
The Maintenance Obligations to be financed, in whole or in part, by this CFO shall consist of the following:

1. Maintenance of the landscape corridors and paseos designed to serve the project areas within the CFO, including but not limited to, soundwalls, trees, bus shelters, autumn leaf cleanup and street sweeping, landscaping, the City and neighborhood entry features and the landscape median;

2. Maintenance of all public pedestrian or bicycle pathways;

3. Maintenance of the Open Space Buffer Areas, Park Preserve areas and any lots that will be conveyed to the City, with such maintenance to include fire breaks and fire safety measures;

4. Maintenance of landscaping, and irrigation, for neighborhood park improvements, maintenance, and repair and replacement;

5. Maintenance of any sound attenuation wall, berm, and related on-site sound attenuation improvements constructed as part of the CFO;

6. Maintenance of storm drainage, stormwater management and drainage system facilities; and

7. Performance and management of any environmental mitigation monitoring, including the annual review thereof.

Other authorized services
include: General City Costs
• City and County costs associated with the setting, levy, and collection of the Special Taxes.

Sinking Funds
The Special Taxes may be collected and set-aside in designated sinking funds to be used by the City to fund miscellaneous costs related to any of the items described above as well as vandalism repair and future repairs to and replacement of landscaping, entry monuments and features, walls and fences, and other improvements the maintenance of which is funded by CFO No. 4.

N
0' 50'
SCALE 1"=50'
25' 100'
Pacific
Street
PleasantGroveBlvd
Industria
lAve
W ashington
Blvd
Foothills
B
lvd
Rosevile
Sunset
Blvd
Pkwy
65 G
a
lleria
B
lvd
St
Atlantic
Blue Oaks Blvd
W hitney
B
lvd
F
iddym
ent
R
d
Del
B
lvd
Baseline Rd
d
lv
B
yit
C
un S
dvl
B
ska
O
ke
er
c
doo W
Main St.

P
o
rter
D
R
N

VICINITY MAP
SITE

PROJECT
80 NOT TO SCALE

PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.4

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER
1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION
(PUBLIC SERVICES)
SCALE: 1"=50' SHEET 1 OF 1
BOOK _____ OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, PAGE ____
OF CALIFORNIA, WHICH THIS ANNEXATION AFFECTS.

PAGE 50, IN THE OFFICE OF THE PLACER COUNTY RECORDER, STATE 2005 IN BOOK 3 OF MAPS OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AT REFERENCE IS HERBY MADE TO THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED ON MAY 3,

CARMEN AVALOS, CITY CLERK
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER IN THE COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

BOOK ______ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE ___ IN THE FILED THIS ______ DAY OF _________________, 20___, AT THE HOUR OF ________ O'CLOCK __.M, IN FEE: ________________________
DOCUMENT NO. _______________________
ON THIS _______ DAY OF ________________, 20_____.

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, PLACER COUNTY CALIFORNIA,

CARMEN AVALOS, CITY CLERK
N
8 9
°
01'2
0 "E 16

5.0 4'
B
O
O
K
2292
O
R
PA
G
E
6 5
6 LO
T
97 PE
R
N00°16'25"E 660.00'(OA)
N00°16'25"E 660.00'(OA)
N
8 9
°
01'2
0 "E 16

5.0 4'
M
A
IN
S
TREET
PE
R
B
O
O
K
M
R.M.PA
G
E
2 8
KA
S
E
B
E
RG
C
O
M
M
O
N
S

PORTER DRIVE PORTER DRIVE
PER BOOK 15 P.M. PAGE 06

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

COUNTY OF PLACER

COUNTY RECORDER
ANNEXATION MAP NO. 9 OF
______________, 20____, BY ITS RESOLUTION NUMBER ______________________.

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE _____ DAY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, "1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION" WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 4 (PUBLIC SERVICES) CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXATION MAP # 9

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2865
File #: 0800-03
Title: Utility Self Service Web Portal and Mobile App - Professional Services Agreement Contact: Andrea Blomquist 916-774-5317 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a professional services agreement with E Source Companies, LLC for consulting services, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
As part of the Utility Billing - Customer Self-Service Web Portal and Mobile App Project, consulting services are needed to assist with the requirements and selection process for the procurement of a replacement customer self-service portal. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued in January 2023. In April 2023, eight respondents replied to the RFP. A committee of eleven (11) participated in the selection process.

Based on a review of the proposals, experience, customer service, tools and price, E Source Companies, LLC ("E Source") was selected as the vendor of choice. E Source has a trademarked approach to requirements and selection processes for various solutions including self-service customer portals. E Source has a proven track record of successful projects and consulting services and will bring resources and expertise to assist the City in selecting a new portal.

The City’s current customer self-service portal for utility services provides bill presentation, selfservice options, payments and a variety of data options for our utility customers. The portal is used by nearly 75% of our customers on a monthly basis and is key in paperless billing functions, autopay, utility data access, and customer self-service functions.

The City implemented the current version of our portal in November 2016. Recently, our current vendor indicated their product has reached the end-of-life and will no longer be supported. As a result, the City needs a new software and self-service portal vendor. Over the past several years, portal vendors have continued to invest in research and product development, and the latest versions of self-service portals contain numerous enhancements to the customer experience, functionality, and data presentation. The selection of a new self-service portal will improve our customer experience and provide access to energy usage data, analytics, and efficiency information.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of this agreement is $225,050 and is budgeted in the Utility Billing - Customer SelfService Web Portal and Mobile App Project in the Electric, Water Rehabilitation, Waste Services Rehabilitation and Wastewater Rehabilitation funds. The recommendation has no impact to the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Deliver exceptional city services and invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.

Respectfully Submitted,
Andrea Blomquist, Utility Billing Operations Manager
Daniel Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-335
Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 23-335

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND E SOURCE COMPANIES, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for consulting services for the assessment and procurement of Utility Self Service Web Portal and Mobile App, by and between the City of Roseville and E Source Companies, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2863
File #: 0704 & 1001
Title: Sierra Vista Specific Plan Parcel WB-52 Park Abandonment Contact: Greg Bitter 916-774-5294 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.19.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution declaring its intention to abandon Sierra Vista Specific Plan (in the Westbrook area) Parcel WB-52 as a City Park and setting a public hearing for September 20, 2023.

BACKGROUND
The proposed park to be abandoned is located on Parcel WB-52 in the northwestern portion of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan (SVSP) (see Attachment 1: Vicinity Map). The 1.5-acre parcel was dedicated to the City of Roseville as a public park as part of the adoption of the Westbrook portion of the SVSP. WB-52 was not conveyed through a grant deed to the City, but rather dedicated on a recorded map. Title remains with the current private landowner of WB-52. This means the City does not own WB-52 in fee simple. The SVSP was approved on May 20, 2010 (File #2007PL044) and includes 2,064 acres west of Fiddyment Road and north of Baseline Road and includes approximately 105 acres of land designated for parks.

As a result of land use amendments and rezones that were approved with Westbrook Phase 2 and 3 (File #PL13-0318), Parcel WB-52 is surrounded by two High Density Residential (HDR) parcels with an Open Space parcel to the north. The City Parks, Recreation & Libraries staff evaluated Parcel WB-52 for its intended use as a City park and determined the site is challenging because of its small size and limited public access. Given the location of the park, the benefit to the overall Westbrook area would be minimal as it would primarily serve the residents of the adjacent HDR parcels. However, the HDR parcels are owned by a private developer that will be providing on-site recreational amenities including outdoor areas for residents of the multi-family project.

With the park abandonment, the City would be receiving the fair market value of Parcel WB-52, as a park in-lieu of land fee, and these funds would go towards the improvement of other parks in the Westbrook portion of the SVSP area. The City Parks, Recreation & Libraries staff have determined that enhancing the amenities at these other nearby parks would provide a benefit to a greater number of residents within the Westbrook area than development of WB-52 as a 1.5 acre park. While this abandonment of WB-52 for use as a park does decrease the total neighborhood park acreage in the SVSP by 1.5 acres, the proposal remains consistent with the City’s General Plan Policies related to Parks and Recreation. General Plan Policy PR1.4 states that: “The City will consider payment of in-lieu fees for both development and parkland as an alternative to dedication of land in order to achieve the parkland standard.”

PARK ABANDONMENT
California law allows a municipality to abandon all or any portion of a park and sell the land pursuant to procedures set forth in the Municipal Park Abandonment Law of 1939, set forth in California Government Code Sections 38501-38510 (the “Municipal Park Abandonment Law”). The Municipal Park Abandonment Law provides a two-step process for a city to abandon a park and sell the park land. Preliminarily, however, the City Council must make the following findings as it relates to all or any portion of the purported park: (1) the land has not been used by the public for park purposes; (2) no consideration has been paid for the land except by the city; (3) no public funds have been expended to improve the land as a park; and (4) the land was dedicated for park purposes by the recording of a plat or map with the County Recorder. In the case of SVSP Parcel WB-52, the land was dedicated to the City via the final large lot subdivision map of Westbrook Phases 2 and 3 by the Westbrook developers as required by the development agreement for the Westbrook area, has not been used by the public for park purposes, no consideration was paid for the land and no public funds have been expended to improve the park.

SVSP Parcel WB-52 is therefore eligible to be abandoned in accordance with the two-step process found in the Municipal Park Abandonment Law.

The first step in abandoning the SVSP Parcel WB-52 park site is for the City Council to adopt a resolution of intention, describing the park to be abandoned and setting a time, at least 30 days after adoption of such a resolution of intention, when it will meet to take final action. The attached resolution of intention describes SVSP Parcel WB-52 as the park to be abandoned and sets September 20, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. as the date when the Council is scheduled to take final action regarding the abandonment. It should be noted that since the City does not own WB-52 in fee simple, and that title remains with the private landowner, the City would be abandoning the dedication of WB-52 (for parks and recreation purposes) and WB-52 would remain with the private landowner, who anticipates using the site to develop affordable housing.

If the Council approves the resolution of intention, the resolution will be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the city for three consecutive weeks prior to September 20, 2023 and will be posted in no less than four places along the boundaries of SVSP Parcel WB-52. At the September 20, 2023 hearing, the City Council shall hear any objections to the abandonment of the park. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may either terminate the abandonment proceedings or order the park to be abandoned and permit the land to be developed.

FISCAL IMPACT
As part of the park abandonment, the City will be receiving the fair market value of the WB-52 property. Therefore, there will be no negative fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Adoption of this resolution of intention meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Bitter, Planning Manager
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-334
Attachment 1 Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-334

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ABANDON
SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN PARCEL WB-52 AS A CITY PARK
AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 20, 2023
WHEREAS, the land commonly referred to as Sierra Vista Specific Plan (“SVSP”) Parcel WB-52 (as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) (hereinafter “Parcel WB-52”) is currently owned by Pine Island Apartments, LLC, but had been dedicated to the City of Roseville (the “City”) on the final large lot subdivision map of Westbrook Phases 2 and 3, which was recorded with the Placer County Clerk Recorder; and WHEREAS, Parcel WB-52 was dedicated to the City as a park and was intended to be developed as a 1.5 acre neighborhood park; and
WHEREAS, after planning for this park, it was discovered that Parcel WB-52 is challenged by a lack of infrastructure, its small size, and limited public access (it is not adjacent to any public roadways). Given the location of the park, the benefit to the overall Westbrook area would be minimal, as it would primarily serve the residents of the adjacent High Density Residential parcels (where on-site recreational amenities are already planned by the developer of those sites); and
WHEREAS, with the park abandonment, the City would be receiving the fair market value of Parcel WB-52, as a park in-lieu of land fee, and these funds could go towards the improvement of other parks in the Westbrook portion of the SVSP area. The City Parks, Recreation & Libraries staff have determined that enhancing the amenities at these other nearby parks would provide a benefit to a greater number of residents within the Westbrook area than development of Parcel WB-52 as a 1.5 acre park; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Park Abandonment Law of 1939 (California Government Code Sections 38501-38510) allows a municipality to abandon all or any portion of a park and sell the land pursuant to certain procedures; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 38501, the City Council must make the following findings as it relates to all or any portion of the park site to be abandoned: (1) the land has not been used by the public for park purposes; (2) no consideration has been paid for the land except by the city; (3) no public funds have been expended to improve the land as a park; and (4) the land was dedicated for park purposes by the recording of a plat or map with the County Recorder; and
WHEREAS, in the case of Parcel WB-52, these findings can be made since the land was dedicated to the City through the recordation of the final large lot subdivision map of Westbrook Phases 2 and 3, it has not been used by the public for park purposes, no consideration was paid for the land, and no public funds have been expended to improve the park; and WHEREAS, the City does not own Parcel WB-52 in fee simple and title remains with the private landowner. The City would be abandoning its right to accept the dedication of WB-52 (for parks and recreation purposes) and title to Parcel WB-52 would remain with the private landowner, who anticipates using the site to develop affordable housing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that

1. The City Council finds that all of the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

2. The City Council hereby declares its intention to abandon Parcel WB-52 (as described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference) as a City park.

3. The time and place for the public hearing on the abandonment of Parcel WB-52 as a City park are set for 6:00 PM on September 20, 2023, at the City Council Chambers located at 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. The City Council may continue the public hearing from time to time.

4. The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution once a week for three successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City prior to the date set herein for the public hearing. Furthermore, City staff is directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be posted in at least four conspicuous places, not more than 100 feet apart, along the boundaries of Parcel WB-52.

5. At the public hearing, the City Council will hear and consider any objections to the proposed abandonment of Parcel WB-52 as a City park, and any interested person will be permitted to present written or oral testimony.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
____________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
EXHIBIT “A”

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, IN THE COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

Lot 2, as shown on that certain map, entitled ‘Final Map, Westbrook Phases 2&3, Large Lot Subdivision, Subdivision No. PL13-0318’. Filed for record December 8, 2016, in Book DD of Maps, Page 79, Placer County Records.

APN: 496-100-028-000.

MDR-7.1
CC
LDR-6 LDR-4.9
LDR-5.1
LDR-4.2
LDR-5.9
LDR-6.3
P/QP
PR
HDR-20.5
PR
HDR-26.4
MDR-7.2
MDR-6.8
HDR-29.3
MDR-7.9
OS
LDR-5
OS
Vicinity Map
Nearmap, Maxar
Land Use Boundary
LDR
MDR
HDR
CC
OS
PR
P/QP
Roseville Parcel
Roseville Street Label
7/24/2023, 2:15:29 PM 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi
0 0.07 0.15 0.3 km
1:9,028
City of Roseville - Development Services
City of Roseville | Development Services
ATTACHMENT 1

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2856
File #: 0102-04 & 0201-01
Title: Council Discretionary Funds - Budget Adjustment
Contact: Melissa Lipp 916-774-5268 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.20.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment in the amount of $19,322 to carry forward $4,322 of unspent FY2022-23 Discretionary Funds for use in FY2023-24 and to appropriate $15,000 of the annual earnings from the Citizen's Benefit Fund for the FY2023-24 allocation to the Council Discretionary Funds.

BACKGROUND
The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a budget adjustment meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6700
Budget Adjustment
ORDINANCE NO. 6700

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment to carry forward unappropriated Discretionary Funds from Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this ______________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
� ROsE11LLE REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
CAl..tFOR NfA
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician FISCAL YEAR:

PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician COUNCIL DATE (if applicable):

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _C_ity�Cl_e_rk ____________ ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Proiect Adjustment FY2024
8/16/2023
3901 5570 54091 000000 $
3901 5570 54091 000000 $ 15,000.00
FUNCTION-30504
Citizens Benefit Fund - Council Discretionary
Funds FY24 budget - FUNCTION-30504
TOTAL $ 19 322.00

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account Center Proiect Adjustment

TOTAL -
NET ADJUSTMENT 19,322 I

FUND BALANCE
ACCOUNT STRING BUDGET($) DESCRIPTION Fund Account I Center I Proiect Adjustment 3901 $ (19,322.00) Reduce Citizens Benefit Fund balance TOTAL $ (19,322.00)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Per Roseville Municipal Code-Section 4.060.040, City Council has the authority to carry forward any unappropriated Citizens Benefit Fund Council Discretionary Funds from one fiscal year to the next. City Council action will be taken on 08/16/2023 to request the carry forward of $4,322 from FY2023 to FY2024 and establish the FY2024 budget for $15,000 (that was not included in the original FY2024 budget request), which will bring the Council's Discretionary Funds for FY2024 to $19,322, allowing the Council greater flexibility on discretionary requests received in FY2024.

REQUIRED APPROVALS:
r Zi>/�
DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY
Revised: June 24, 2019
7/18/20233:22 PM
BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

DATE

BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE
Citizens Benefit Fund - Council Discretionary
4,322.00 Funds FY23 to FY24 balance carryforward

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2876
File #: 0900-04-03 & 0201-01
Title:

Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop Tenant Improvement - Design-Assist Construction Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Rebecca McCoy 916-774-5706 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution to approve a Design-Assist Construction Agreement with Carter/Kelly, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop Tenant Improvement Project, and authorize the City Manager to execute it; and

2. Approve change order authority as needed up to 10% of the project; and

3. Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment for the project.

BACKGROUND
The Traffic Signal Maintenance Section of Public Works/Engineering (Section) is responsible for the maintenance and operation of over 200 traffic signals and numerous Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) devices. A study in 2016 concluded that, based on the rate of development at that time, additional staffing will be needed in the Section to continue to meet traffic signal maintenance and operation needs as the City grows. Since that time, development has continued at a rate that meets or exceeds what was anticipated.

The existing Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop is located at 2025 Hilltop Circle in the Corporation Yard in a small 1,200 SF area next to the Street Maintenance Division. A Space Needs Study in 2016 concluded that 2,300 SF is needed for the expected growth of the Section over the next several years.

Public Works staff worked closely with Finance and Electric staff to identify space in Corp Yard Building B (2075 Hilltop Circle) to accommodate the Section's ultimate long term needs.

Design of the new space has been completed, and on February 17, 2023, staff issued a Request for Proposals soliciting Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) bids by Design Assist contractors.

The Engineer's estimate was $1,200,000. Carter-Kelly was the only bidder and their GMP was $1,340,000. Despite being the only bidder and the price being above the Engineer's Estimate, it was within an expected margin of error anticipated due to increased costs for labor and materials.

Carter/Kelly, Inc. has also done numerous projects with the City and staff are comfortable that the bid reflects the actual fair market cost of the improvements.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total project cost is approximately $1.7 million. An additional $513,000 is needed to fully fund project construction. The recommended budget adjustment is for $235,000 from the Traffic Mitigation fee Fund, $20,000 from the Transit (Local Transportation Fees) Fund, and $258,000 from the Electric Fund for all demolition, construction, inspection and staff time. No General Fund resources will be used.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the minor alteration and reconstruction of an existing public structure. The proposed activities are categorically exempt from CEQA as Class 1 and Class 2 Exemptions (State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15302). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Rebecca McCoy, Project Coordinator
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-341
Design-Assist ConstructionAgreement
Ordinance 6703
Budget Adjustment
CEQA Exemption
RESOLUTION NO. 23-341

APPROVING A DESIGN-ASSIST CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN CARTER/KELLY, INC., AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Design-Assist Construction Agreement for the Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop Tenant Improvement Project, by and between Carter/Kelly, Inc., and the City of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 6703

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2023-24, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Traffic Signal Maintenance Shop Tenant Improvement Project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this ______________ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2875
File #: 0600-01
Title: Staffing and Salary Updates
Contact: Linda Hampton 916-774-5215 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing structure to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends the following changes to the City’s staffing allocation and salary schedules to meet business needs. It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Adopt an ordinance to approve the Management A & B (Appendix I) salary schedules reflecting the addition of Police Social Services Supervisor (1126A, 1126B) effective August 26, 2023; and

2. Adopt an ordinance to approve the Temporary (Appendix R) salary schedule reflecting the addition of Community Outreach Specialist (1127), a wage adjustment and title change for Reserve Police Officer Unpaid (6252) to Reserve Police Officer I and the deletion of Police Reserve Officer I (9526) effective August 26, 2023; and

3. Motion to approve the attached city-wide allocation schedule effective August 26, 2023.

BACKGROUND
As part of the Municipal Code, the Human Resources Department maintains the City’s classification plan. Human Resources staff continually evaluate organizational structure and staffing levels necessary to provide high service levels to the community. The recommended changes include adding one (1) position already funded in the FY2023-24 budget, two new classifications, the deletion of one classification, and one wage adjustment for a temporary classification. In addition, staff requests the reclassification of two vacant positions, and one reclassification of an employee to a different classification. Staff has completed the meet and confer process with Local 39 regarding any impacts, and the recommended changes are summarized below:

Recommendations:

The proposed classification changes are as follows:

Add
Grade
Codes
Classification
Name
Wage Range
Minimum
Wage Range
Maximum
Bargaining
Unit
1126A;
1126B
Police Social
Services
Supervisor
$7,048 per
month
$9,445 per
month
Management
1127 Community
Outreach
Specialist
$34 per hour $41 per hour Temporary
Delete
Grade
Codes
Classification
Name
Bargaining
Unit
9526 Police Reserve
Officer I
Temporary
Title Change
Grade
Codes From To
Bargaining
Unit
6252 Reserve Police
Officer I (Unpaid)
Reserve
Police Officer
I
Temporary
Wage Adjustments
Grade
Code
Classification
Name
Current
Wage
Proposed
Wage
Bargaining
Unit
6252 Reserve Police
Officer I
$0 $40.9115 to
$52.1691/
hour
Temporary
Changes by Department:

Environmental Utilities
A recent classification study was completed on an incumbent in a Development Technician II position. As an outcome of that study, staff requests to reclassify the position and employee to Administrative Technician as it’s appropriate for the work being assigned.

Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PR&L)
Staff requests to reclassify two vacant positions, Youth Development Program Coordinator and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Coordinator to Child Care Site Coordinator positions to meet the business needs of the department.

Police
One new position, Police Social Services Supervisor, was requested in the FY2023-24 budget process. The funding for this position was included in the budget, but a new position allocation wasn’t added as a review was needed to ensure the work to be assigned was appropriate for the classification. The review is complete, and staff recommends adding a Police Social Services Supervisor position and classification.

Also requested as part of the budget process was a new temporary classification of Community Outreach Specialist. Staff recommends adding this classification to the temporary salary schedule.

The Police Department is enhancing the Reserve Police Officer program. Reserve officers assist regular officers in the enforcement of laws and in maintaining peace and order within the community and will augment the Operations Division. With an active Reserve program, the City may be able to agree to more contracted shifts. As part of this program, staff requests a title change from Reserve Police Officer I Unpaid to Reserve Police Officer I and adding a wage schedule for Reserve Police Officer I on the temporary salary schedule. Also requested is the elimination of Police Reserve Officer I as this classification is no longer utilized.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated total net cost of the recommended position adjustments will be $137,092 for the remainder of FY2023-24, of which $155,474 has been included in the FY2023-24 budget. All other changes will be absorbed into existing budgets, so no budget adjustment is required.

The recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $154,973. The following table provides a summary of costs by fund.

Fund
Remainder
of FY2023-24 Ongoing
Environmental
Utilities
$2,693 $3,044
Youth Development
Fund
-$21,075 -$23,824
General Fund $155,474 $175,753
Total $137,092 $154,973
The following charts summarize the cost of the recommended position adjustment recommendations by department.

Environmental Utilities
From To Current Proposed Annual Impact for
Salary &
Benefits
Salary &
Benefits
Impact * remaining
FY 2023-
24 Development
Technician II
Administrative
Technician
$119,978 $123,022 $3,044 $2,693
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $212.

Parks, Recreation and Libraries
From To Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2023-
24 Youth Development
Program
Coordinator
Child Care Site
Coordinator
$131,027 $119,115 -$11,912 -$10,537
Parks, Recreation
and Libraries
Coordinator
Child Care Site
Coordinator
$131,027 $119,115 -$11,912 -$10,537
Total -$23,824* -$21,075
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension savings of $1,667.

Police
From To Current
Salary &
Benefits
Proposed
Salary &
Benefits
Annual
Impact *
Impact for
remaining
FY 2023-
24 New Police Social
Services
Supervisor
$0 $175,753 $175,753 $155,474
*This amount includes the estimated annual pension cost of $12,294.

The annual impact was included in the General Fund FY2023-24 budget. The wage change for Reserve Police Officer I and the addition of Community Outreach Specialist will be absorbed in the current Police budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed staffing changes meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Linda Hampton, Human Resources Manager
Stacey Peterson, Human Resources Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6701
2023-08-26 Management Salary ScheduleA
2023-08-26 Management Salary Schedule B
Ordinance 6702
2023-08-26 Temporary Salary Schedule
2023-08-26 PositionAllocation Schedule
ORDINANCE NO. 6701

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6694, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “I” TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 26, 2023, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.

Ordinance No. 6694, the Salary Ordinance for Management Employees, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “I” for salary schedules A & B attached hereto.

ADDITION OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
1126A/1126B Police Social Services Supervisor $54.49
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be effective August 26, 2023 as an urgency measure.

SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect August 26, 2023. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.

SECTION 4. Posting.

The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _________________, 2023, by the following vote on roll call:
2 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_____________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1505A AMI Project Manager-A Step A 52.3163 4185.30 9068.16 108817.90 Step B 54.9321 4394.57 9521.56 114258.77
Step C 57.6787 4614.30 9997.64 119971.70
Step D 60.5627 4845.02 10497.53 125970.42
Step E 63.5907 5087.26 11022.39 132268.66
Step F 66.7702 5341.62 11573.50 138882.02
Step G 70.1088 5608.70 12152.19 145826.30
1370A Accounting Manager-A Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 60.7396 4859.17 10528.20 126338.37
Step C 63.7766 5102.13 11054.61 132655.33
Step D 66.9654 5357.23 11607.34 139288.03
Step E 70.3136 5625.09 12187.69 146252.29
Step F 73.8294 5906.35 12797.10 153565.15
Step G 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0043A Accounting Supervisor-A Step A 48.5327 3882.62 8412.33 100948.02 Step B 50.9594 4076.75 8832.96 105995.55
Step C 53.5074 4280.59 9274.62 111295.39
Step D 56.1828 4494.62 9738.35 116860.22
Step E 58.9919 4719.35 10225.26 122703.15
Step F 61.9415 4955.32 10736.53 128838.32
Step G 65.0386 5203.09 11273.36 135280.29
9427A Accounts Payable Supervisor-A Step A 46.2214 3697.71 8011.71 96140.51 Step B 48.5324 3882.59 8412.28 100947.39
Step C 50.9590 4076.72 8832.89 105994.72
Step D 53.5069 4280.55 9274.53 111294.35
Step E 56.1823 4494.58 9738.27 116859.18
Step F 58.9914 4719.31 10225.18 122702.11
Step G 61.9410 4955.28 10736.44 128837.28
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0090A Alternative Transportation Manager-A Step A 61.5691 4925.53 10671.98 128063.73 Step B 64.6476 5171.81 11205.58 134467.01
Step C 67.8799 5430.39 11765.85 141190.19
Step D 71.2740 5701.92 12354.16 148249.92
Step E 74.8377 5987.02 12971.87 155662.42
Step F 78.5796 6286.37 13620.46 163445.57
Step G 82.5084 6600.67 14301.46 171617.47
0245A Assistant City Attorney-A Step A 88.4976 7079.81 15339.58 184075.01 Step B 92.9225 7433.80 16106.57 193278.80
Step C 97.5685 7805.48 16911.87 202942.48
Step D 102.4470 8195.76 17757.48 213089.76
Step E 107.5693 8605.54 18645.35 223744.14
Step F 112.9479 9035.83 19577.64 234931.63
Step G 118.5952 9487.62 20556.50 246678.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0250A Assistant City Clerk-A Step A 47.0617 3764.94 8157.36 97888.34 Step B 49.4149 3953.19 8565.25 102782.99
Step C 51.8857 4150.86 8993.52 107922.26
Step D 54.4800 4358.40 9443.20 113318.40
Step E 57.2040 4576.32 9915.36 118984.32
Step F 60.0641 4805.13 10411.11 124933.33
Step G 63.0674 5045.39 10931.68 131180.19
0325A Assistant City Manager-A Step A 93.1372 7450.98 16143.78 193725.38 Step B 97.7939 7823.51 16950.94 203411.31
Step C 102.6837 8214.70 17798.51 213582.10
Step D 107.8179 8625.43 18688.44 224261.23
Step E 113.2088 9056.70 19622.86 235474.30
Step F 118.8692 9509.54 20603.99 247247.94
Step G 124.8126 9985.01 21634.18 259610.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1021A Assistant City Manager/Chief
Financial Officer-A
Step A 93.1372 7450.98 16143.78 193725.38
Step B 97.7939 7823.51 16950.94 203411.31
Step C 102.6837 8214.70 17798.51 213582.10
Step D 107.8179 8625.43 18688.44 224261.23
Step E 113.2088 9056.70 19622.86 235474.30
Step F 118.8692 9509.54 20603.99 247247.94
Step G 124.8126 9985.01 21634.18 259610.21
1068A Assistant Electric Analyst-A Step A 36.0568 2884.54 6249.85 74998.14 Step B 37.8597 3028.78 6562.35 78748.18
Step C 39.7526 3180.21 6890.45 82685.41
Step D 41.7403 3339.22 7234.99 86819.82
Step E 43.8273 3506.18 7596.73 91160.78
Step F 46.0187 3681.50 7976.57 95718.90
Step G 48.3196 3865.57 8375.40 100504.77
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0395A Assistant Electric Utility Director-A Step A 102.2264 8178.11 17719.24 212630.91 Step B 107.3378 8587.02 18605.22 223262.62
Step C 112.7048 9016.38 19535.50 234425.98
Step D 118.3399 9467.19 20512.25 246146.99
Step E 124.2570 9940.56 21537.88 258454.56
Step F 130.4698 10437.58 22614.77 271377.18
Step G 136.9934 10959.47 23745.52 284946.27
0411A Assistant Environmental Utilities
Director-A
Step A 74.2299 5938.39 12866.52 154398.19
Step B 77.9414 6235.31 13509.84 162118.11
Step C 81.8386 6547.09 14185.36 170224.29
Step D 85.9303 6874.42 14894.59 178735.02
Step E 90.2269 7218.15 15639.33 187671.95
Step F 94.7383 7579.06 16421.31 197055.66
Step G 99.4752 7958.02 17242.37 206908.42
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1026A Assistant Finance Director-A Step A 66.5234 5321.87 11530.72 138368.67 Step B 69.8495 5587.96 12107.25 145286.96
Step C 73.3421 5867.37 12712.63 152551.57
Step D 77.0092 6160.74 13348.26 160179.14
Step E 80.8597 6468.78 14015.68 168188.18
Step F 84.9027 6792.22 14716.47 176597.62
Step G 89.1478 7131.82 15452.29 185427.42
0480A Assistant Fire Chief-A Step A 69.3681 5549.45 12023.80 144285.65 Step B 72.8364 5826.91 12624.98 151499.71
Step C 76.4785 6118.28 13256.27 159075.28
Step D 80.3023 6424.18 13919.07 167028.78
Step E 84.3175 6745.40 14615.03 175380.40
Step F 88.5333 7082.66 15345.77 184149.26
Step G 92.9601 7436.81 16113.08 193357.01
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0484A Assistant Human Resources DirectorA Step A 59.2210 4737.68 10264.97 123179.68 Step B 62.1815 4974.52 10778.13 129337.52
Step C 65.2912 5223.30 11317.14 135805.70
Step D 68.5557 5484.46 11882.99 142595.86
Step E 71.9836 5758.69 12477.16 149725.89
Step F 75.5827 6046.62 13101.00 157212.02
Step G 79.3618 6348.94 13756.05 165072.54
9558A Assistant Information Technology
Director-A
Step A 65.1445 5211.56 11291.71 135500.56
Step B 68.4019 5472.15 11856.33 142275.95
Step C 71.8219 5745.75 12449.13 149389.55
Step D 75.4129 6033.03 13071.57 156858.83
Step E 79.1838 6334.70 13725.19 164702.30
Step F 83.1428 6651.42 14411.42 172937.02
Step G 87.2999 6983.99 15131.98 181583.79
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0510A Assistant Police Chief-A Step A 81.0476 6483.81 14048.25 168579.01 Step B 85.0998 6807.98 14750.63 177007.58
Step C 89.3550 7148.40 15488.20 185858.40
Step D 93.8226 7505.81 16262.58 195151.01
Step E 98.5138 7881.10 17075.73 204908.70
Step F 103.4395 8275.16 17929.51 215154.16
Step G 108.6115 8688.92 18825.99 225911.92
0086A Assistant Transportation Planner-A Step A 37.2032 2976.26 6448.55 77382.66 Step B 39.0636 3125.09 6771.02 81252.29
Step C 41.0167 3281.34 7109.56 85314.74
Step D 43.0675 3445.40 7465.03 89580.40
Step E 45.2207 3617.66 7838.25 94059.06
Step F 47.4818 3798.54 8230.18 98762.14
Step G 49.8560 3988.48 8641.71 103700.48
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1067A Associate Electric Analyst-A Step A 39.6624 3172.99 6874.82 82497.79 Step B 41.6457 3331.66 7218.59 86623.06
Step C 43.7279 3498.23 7579.50 90954.03
Step D 45.9143 3673.14 7958.48 95501.74
Step E 48.2101 3856.81 8356.42 100277.01
Step F 50.6205 4049.64 8774.22 105290.64
Step G 53.1516 4252.13 9212.94 110555.33
0088A Associate Transportation Planner-A Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0910A Budget Analyst I-A Step A 39.0623 3124.98 6770.80 81249.58 Step B 41.0152 3281.22 7109.30 85311.62
Step C 43.0662 3445.30 7464.81 89577.70
Step D 45.2195 3617.56 7838.05 94056.56
Step E 47.4806 3798.45 8229.97 98759.65
Step F 49.8544 3988.35 8641.43 103697.15
Step G 52.3472 4187.78 9073.51 108882.18
0915A Budget Analyst II-A Step A 42.9694 3437.55 7448.03 89376.35 Step B 45.1177 3609.42 7820.40 93844.82
Step C 47.3739 3789.91 8211.48 98537.71
Step D 49.7424 3979.39 8622.02 103464.19
Step E 52.2296 4178.37 9053.13 108637.57
Step F 54.8413 4387.30 9505.83 114069.90
Step G 57.5832 4606.66 9981.09 119773.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0930A Budget Manager-A Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 60.7396 4859.17 10528.20 126338.37
Step C 63.7766 5102.13 11054.61 132655.33
Step D 66.9654 5357.23 11607.34 139288.03
Step E 70.3136 5625.09 12187.69 146252.29
Step F 73.8294 5906.35 12797.10 153565.15
Step G 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
1017A Building Inspection Supervisor-A Step A 46.3003 3704.02 8025.39 96304.62 Step B 48.6153 3889.22 8426.65 101119.82
Step C 51.0461 4083.69 8847.99 106175.89
Step D 53.5983 4287.86 9290.37 111484.46
Step E 56.2784 4502.27 9754.92 117059.07
Step F 59.0924 4727.39 10242.68 122912.19
Step G 62.0468 4963.74 10754.78 129057.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1043A Building Official-A Step A 61.6607 4932.86 10687.85 128254.26 Step B 64.7437 5179.50 11222.24 134666.90
Step C 67.9810 5438.48 11783.37 141400.48
Step D 71.3799 5710.39 12372.52 148470.19
Step E 74.9488 5995.90 12991.13 155893.50
Step F 78.6963 6295.70 13640.69 163688.30
Step G 82.6311 6610.49 14322.72 171872.69
1180A Chief Information Officer-A Step A 81.4308 6514.46 14114.67 169376.06 Step B 85.5023 6840.18 14820.40 177844.78
Step C 89.7775 7182.20 15561.43 186737.20
Step D 94.2663 7541.30 16339.49 196073.90
Step E 98.9795 7918.36 17156.45 205877.36
Step F 103.9287 8314.30 18014.31 216171.70
Step G 109.1251 8730.01 18915.02 226980.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1220A City Clerk-A Step A 64.2382 5139.06 11134.62 133615.46 Step B 67.4501 5396.01 11691.35 140296.21
Step C 70.8226 5665.81 12275.92 147311.01
Step D 74.3638 5949.10 12889.73 154676.70
Step E 78.0819 6246.55 13534.20 162410.35
Step F 81.9861 6558.89 14210.92 170531.09
Step G 86.0854 6886.83 14921.47 179057.63
1368A Code Enforcement Supervisor-A Step A 42.5923 3407.38 7382.67 88591.98 Step B 44.7218 3577.74 7751.78 93021.34
Step C 46.9582 3756.66 8139.42 97673.06
Step D 49.3060 3944.48 8546.37 102556.48
Step E 51.7712 4141.70 8973.67 107684.10
Step F 54.3597 4348.78 9422.35 113068.18
Step G 57.0778 4566.22 9893.49 118721.82
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1027A Construction Inspection
Superintendent-A
Step A 47.3489 3787.91 8207.14 98485.71
Step B 49.7165 3977.32 8617.53 103410.32
Step C 52.2023 4176.18 9048.40 108580.78
Step D 54.8124 4384.99 9500.82 114009.79
Step E 57.5529 4604.23 9975.84 119710.03
Step F 60.4308 4834.46 10474.67 125696.06
Step G 63.4523 5076.18 10998.40 131980.78
3740A Cultural Arts Supervisor-A Step A 37.3398 2987.18 6472.23 77666.78 Step B 39.2065 3136.52 6795.79 81549.52
Step C 41.1670 3293.36 7135.61 85627.36
Step D 43.2254 3458.03 7492.40 89908.83
Step E 45.3867 3630.94 7867.03 94404.34
Step F 47.6559 3812.47 8260.36 99124.27
Step G 50.0387 4003.10 8673.37 104080.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1025A Custodian Supervisor-A Step A 24.9933 1999.46 4332.17 51986.06 Step B 26.2429 2099.43 4548.77 54585.23
Step C 27.5551 2204.41 4776.22 57314.61
Step D 28.9329 2314.63 5015.04 60180.43
Step E 30.3795 2430.36 5265.78 63189.36
Step F 31.8984 2551.87 5529.06 66348.67
Step G 33.4933 2679.46 5805.51 69666.06
9561A Data Management System
Administrator-A
Step A 54.6139 4369.11 9466.41 113596.91
Step B 57.3445 4587.56 9939.71 119276.56
Step C 60.2119 4816.95 10436.73 125240.75
Step D 63.2225 5057.80 10958.57 131502.80
Step E 66.3836 5310.69 11506.49 138077.89
Step F 69.7027 5576.22 12081.80 144981.62
Step G 73.1880 5855.04 12685.92 152231.04
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1645A Department Public Information
Officer-A
Step A 48.5318 3882.54 8412.18 100946.14
Step B 50.9586 4076.69 8832.82 105993.89
Step C 53.5065 4280.52 9274.46 111293.52
Step D 56.1818 4494.54 9738.18 116858.14
Step E 58.9909 4719.27 10225.09 122701.07
Step F 61.9405 4955.24 10736.35 128836.24
Step G 65.0374 5202.99 11273.15 135277.79
1655A Deputy City Attorney I-A Step A 63.5988 5087.90 11023.79 132285.50 Step B 66.7787 5342.30 11574.97 138899.70
Step C 70.1176 5609.41 12153.72 145844.61
Step D 73.6235 5889.88 12761.41 153136.88
Step E 77.3048 6184.38 13399.50 160793.98
Step F 81.1700 6493.60 14069.47 168833.60
Step G 85.2284 6818.27 14772.92 177275.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1658A Deputy City Attorney II-A Step A 69.9587 5596.70 12126.17 145514.10 Step B 73.4566 5876.53 12732.48 152789.73
Step C 77.1295 6170.36 13369.11 160429.36
Step D 80.9859 6478.87 14037.56 168450.67
Step E 85.0352 6802.82 14739.43 176873.22
Step F 89.2869 7142.95 15476.40 185716.75
Step G 93.7513 7500.10 16250.23 195002.70
1659A Deputy City Manager-A Step A 70.6621 5652.97 12248.10 146977.17 Step B 74.1952 5935.62 12860.50 154326.02
Step C 77.9049 6232.39 13503.52 162042.19
Step D 81.8002 6544.02 14178.70 170144.42
Step E 85.8902 6871.22 14887.63 178651.62
Step F 90.1847 7214.78 15632.01 187584.18
Step G 94.6939 7575.51 16413.61 196963.31
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1280A Development Services AdministratorA Step A 47.5407 3803.26 8240.39 98884.66 Step B 49.9177 3993.42 8652.40 103828.82
Step C 52.4136 4193.09 9085.02 109020.29
Step D 55.0342 4402.74 9539.26 114471.14
Step E 57.7861 4622.89 10016.26 120195.09
Step F 60.6755 4854.04 10517.09 126205.04
Step G 63.7090 5096.72 11042.89 132514.72
1676A Development Services Director-A Step A 77.7295 6218.36 13473.11 161677.36 Step B 81.6160 6529.28 14146.77 169761.28
Step C 85.6968 6855.74 14854.11 178249.34
Step D 89.9815 7198.52 15596.79 187161.52
Step E 94.4808 7558.46 16376.67 196520.06
Step F 99.2049 7936.39 17195.52 206346.19
Step G 104.1649 8333.19 18055.25 216662.99
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1695A Development Services Manager-A Step A 56.5718 4525.74 9805.78 117669.34 Step B 59.4003 4752.02 10296.05 123552.62
Step C 62.3704 4989.63 10810.87 129730.43
Step D 65.4889 5239.11 11351.41 136216.91
Step E 68.7634 5501.07 11918.99 143027.87
Step F 72.2017 5776.14 12514.96 150179.54
Step G 75.8118 6064.94 13140.71 157688.54
2415A EMS Quality Assurance CoordinatorA Step A 50.7137 4057.10 8790.37 105484.50 Step B 53.2493 4259.94 9229.88 110758.54
Step C 55.9120 4472.96 9691.41 116296.96
Step D 58.7077 4696.62 10176.00 122112.02
Step E 61.6429 4931.43 10684.77 128217.23
Step F 64.7251 5178.01 11219.02 134628.21
Step G 67.9613 5436.90 11779.96 141359.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6520A ERP Program Manager-A Step A 51.3060 4104.48 8893.04 106716.48 Step B 53.8711 4309.69 9337.66 112051.89
Step C 56.5645 4525.16 9804.51 117654.16
Step D 59.3928 4751.42 10294.75 123537.02
Step E 62.3624 4988.99 10809.48 129713.79
Step F 65.4806 5238.45 11349.97 136199.65
Step G 68.7547 5500.38 11917.48 143009.78
1674A Economic Development Analyst I-A Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.0640 3125.12 6771.09 81253.12
Step C 41.0171 3281.37 7109.63 85315.57
Step D 43.0682 3445.46 7465.15 89581.86
Step E 45.2216 3617.73 7838.41 94060.93
Step F 47.4827 3798.62 8230.33 98764.02
Step G 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1675A Economic Development Analyst II-A Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
1710A Economic Development Director-A Step A 74.0306 5922.45 12831.97 153983.65 Step B 77.7325 6218.60 13473.63 161683.60
Step C 81.6190 6529.52 14147.29 169767.52
Step D 85.6999 6855.99 14854.65 178255.79
Step E 89.9849 7198.79 15597.38 187168.59
Step F 94.4843 7558.74 16377.28 196527.34
Step G 99.2084 7936.67 17196.12 206353.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1001A Economic Development Project
Manager-A
Step A 51.3427 4107.42 8899.40 106792.82
Step B 53.9098 4312.78 9344.37 112132.38
Step C 56.6053 4528.42 9811.59 117739.02
Step D 59.4355 4754.84 10302.15 123625.84
Step E 62.4073 4992.58 10817.27 129807.18
Step F 65.5277 5242.22 11358.13 136297.62
Step G 68.8041 5504.33 11926.04 143112.53
1310A Electric Business Analyst I-A Step A 47.5953 3807.62 8249.85 98998.22 Step B 49.9751 3998.01 8662.35 103948.21
Step C 52.4739 4197.91 9095.48 109145.71
Step D 55.0975 4407.80 9550.23 114602.80
Step E 57.8525 4628.20 10027.77 120333.20
Step F 60.7451 4859.61 10529.15 126349.81
Step G 63.7823 5102.58 11055.60 132667.18
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1312A Electric Business Analyst II-A Step A 52.3545 4188.36 9074.78 108897.36 Step B 54.9723 4397.78 9528.53 114342.38
Step C 57.7208 4617.66 10004.94 120059.26
Step D 60.6069 4848.55 10505.20 126062.35
Step E 63.6372 5090.98 11030.45 132365.38
Step F 66.8191 5345.53 11581.98 138983.73
Step G 70.1600 5612.80 12161.07 145932.80
1066A Electric Compliance Analyst I-A Step A 47.5950 3807.60 8249.80 98997.60 Step B 49.9748 3997.98 8662.30 103947.58
Step C 52.4736 4197.89 9095.42 109145.09
Step D 55.0972 4407.78 9550.18 114602.18
Step E 57.8520 4628.16 10027.68 120332.16
Step F 60.7446 4859.57 10529.06 126348.77
Step G 63.7819 5102.55 11055.53 132666.35
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2335A Electric Compliance Analyst II-A Step A 52.3553 4188.42 9074.92 108899.02 Step B 54.9732 4397.86 9528.69 114344.26
Step C 57.7218 4617.74 10005.11 120061.34
Step D 60.6078 4848.62 10505.35 126064.22
Step E 63.6382 5091.06 11030.62 132367.46
Step F 66.8201 5345.61 11582.15 138985.81
Step G 70.1612 5612.90 12161.27 145935.30
6285A Electric Customer Programs
Supervisor-A
Step A 66.2291 5298.33 11479.71 137756.53
Step B 69.5407 5563.26 12053.72 144644.66
Step C 73.0177 5841.42 12656.40 151876.82
Step D 76.6684 6133.47 13289.19 159470.27
Step E 80.5018 6440.14 13953.65 167443.74
Step F 84.5269 6762.15 14651.33 175815.95
Step G 88.7534 7100.27 15383.92 184607.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1117A Electric Economic and Development
Partnership Manager-A
Step A 72.8521 5828.17 12627.70 151532.37
Step B 76.4947 6119.58 13259.08 159108.98
Step C 80.3194 6425.55 13922.03 167064.35
Step D 84.3354 6746.83 14618.14 175417.63
Step E 88.5521 7084.17 15349.03 184188.37
Step F 92.9798 7438.38 16116.50 193397.98
Step G 97.6287 7810.30 16922.31 203067.70
2284A Electric Engineering Technician
Supervisor-A
Step A 58.8774 4710.19 10205.42 122464.99
Step B 61.8211 4945.69 10715.66 128587.89
Step C 64.9122 5192.98 11251.45 135017.38
Step D 68.1579 5452.63 11814.04 141768.43
Step E 71.5656 5725.25 12404.70 148856.45
Step F 75.1440 6011.52 13024.96 156299.52
Step G 78.9012 6312.10 13676.21 164114.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2338A Electric Operations Manager-A Step A 88.8925 7111.40 15408.03 184896.40 Step B 93.3371 7466.97 16178.43 194141.17
Step C 98.0039 7840.31 16987.34 203848.11
Step D 102.9043 8232.34 17836.75 214040.94
Step E 108.0495 8643.96 18728.58 224742.96
Step F 113.4519 9076.15 19665.00 235979.95
Step G 119.1244 9529.95 20648.23 247778.75
2339A Electric Operations Supervisor-A Step A 80.8150 6465.20 14007.93 168095.20 Step B 84.8559 6788.47 14708.36 176500.27
Step C 89.0986 7127.89 15443.76 185325.09
Step D 93.5534 7484.27 16215.92 194591.07
Step E 98.2312 7858.50 17026.74 204320.90
Step F 103.1428 8251.42 17878.09 214537.02
Step G 108.2998 8663.98 18771.97 225263.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2314A Electric Resources Planner I-A Step A 54.9699 4397.59 9528.12 114337.39 Step B 57.7184 4617.47 10004.52 120054.27
Step C 60.6043 4848.34 10504.75 126056.94
Step D 63.6344 5090.75 11029.96 132359.55
Step E 66.8162 5345.30 11581.47 138977.70
Step F 70.1570 5612.56 12160.55 145926.56
Step G 73.6650 5893.20 12768.60 153223.20
2316A Electric Resources Planner II-A Step A 60.4668 4837.34 10480.91 125770.94 Step B 63.4902 5079.22 11004.97 132059.62
Step C 66.6646 5333.17 11555.20 138662.37
Step D 69.9979 5599.83 12132.97 145595.63
Step E 73.4978 5879.82 12739.62 152875.42
Step F 77.1727 6173.82 13376.60 160519.22
Step G 81.0315 6482.52 14045.46 168545.52
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2216A Electric Risk and Compliance
Supervisor-A
Step A 66.2254 5298.03 11479.07 137748.83
Step B 69.5366 5562.93 12053.01 144636.13
Step C 73.0136 5841.09 12655.69 151868.29
Step D 76.6641 6133.13 13288.44 159461.33
Step E 80.4975 6439.80 13952.90 167434.80
Step F 84.5223 6761.78 14650.53 175806.38
Step G 88.7483 7099.86 15383.04 184596.46
2352A Electric Safety Coordinator-A Step A 40.9244 3273.95 7093.56 85122.75 Step B 42.9704 3437.63 7448.20 89378.43
Step C 45.1189 3609.51 7820.61 93847.31
Step D 47.3750 3790.00 8211.67 98540.00
Step E 49.7435 3979.48 8622.21 103466.48
Step F 52.2307 4178.46 9053.32 108639.86
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2319A Electric Substation Supervisor-A Step A 80.8150 6465.20 14007.93 168095.20 Step B 84.8559 6788.47 14708.36 176500.27
Step C 89.0986 7127.89 15443.76 185325.09
Step D 93.5534 7484.27 16215.92 194591.07
Step E 98.2312 7858.50 17026.74 204320.90
Step F 103.1428 8251.42 17878.09 214537.02
Step G 108.2998 8663.98 18771.97 225263.58
9560A Electric Technology Systems
Administrator-A
Step A 66.2292 5298.34 11479.73 137756.74
Step B 69.5407 5563.26 12053.72 144644.66
Step C 73.0176 5841.41 12656.38 151876.61
Step D 76.6684 6133.47 13289.19 159470.27
Step E 80.5019 6440.15 13953.66 167443.95
Step F 84.5271 6762.17 14651.36 175816.37
Step G 88.7534 7100.27 15383.92 184607.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1116A Electric Utility Chief Operating
Officer-A
Step A 112.4492 8995.94 19491.19 233894.34
Step B 118.0717 9445.74 20465.76 245589.14
Step C 123.9753 9918.02 21489.05 257868.62
Step D 130.1741 10413.93 22563.51 270762.13
Step E 136.6828 10934.62 23691.69 284300.22
Step F 143.5169 11481.35 24876.26 298515.15
Step G 150.6927 12055.42 26120.07 313440.82
2320A Electric Utility Director-A Step A 127.7846 10222.77 22149.33 265791.97 Step B 134.1739 10733.91 23256.81 279081.71
Step C 140.8827 11270.62 24419.67 293036.02
Step D 147.9268 11834.14 25640.65 307687.74
Step E 155.3232 12425.86 26922.69 323072.26
Step F 163.0893 13047.14 28268.81 339225.74
Step G 171.2437 13699.50 29682.24 356186.90
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2215A Electric Utility Financial AdministratorA Step A 66.2287 5298.30 11479.64 137755.70 Step B 69.5400 5563.20 12053.60 144643.20
Step C 73.0171 5841.37 12656.30 151875.57
Step D 76.6679 6133.43 13289.10 159469.23
Step E 80.5014 6440.11 13953.58 167442.91
Step F 84.5264 6762.11 14651.24 175814.91
Step G 88.7529 7100.23 15383.84 184606.03
2378A Electronic Maintenance CoordinatorA Step A 43.4760 3478.08 7535.84 90430.08 Step B 45.6498 3651.98 7912.63 94951.58
Step C 47.9323 3834.58 8308.27 99699.18
Step D 50.3289 4026.31 8723.68 104684.11
Step E 52.8452 4227.62 9159.83 109918.02
Step F 55.4875 4439.00 9617.83 115414.00
Step G 58.2618 4660.94 10098.71 121184.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2500A Energy Services Account
Representative I-A
Step A 46.8489 3747.91 8120.48 97445.71
Step B 49.1914 3935.31 8526.51 102318.11
Step C 51.6509 4132.07 8952.82 107433.87
Step D 54.2334 4338.67 9400.46 112805.47
Step E 56.9452 4555.62 9870.50 118446.02
Step F 59.7924 4783.39 10364.02 124368.19
Step G 62.7820 5022.56 10882.21 130586.56
2501A Energy Services Account
Representative II-A
Step A 51.5339 4122.71 8932.54 107190.51
Step B 54.1106 4328.85 9379.17 112550.05
Step C 56.8161 4545.29 9848.12 118177.49
Step D 59.6569 4772.55 10340.53 124086.35
Step E 62.6399 5011.19 10857.58 130290.99
Step F 65.7718 5261.74 11400.45 136805.34
Step G 69.0604 5524.83 11970.47 143645.63
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1277A Engineering Manager-A Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 67.7722 5421.78 11747.18 140966.18
Step C 71.1603 5692.82 12334.45 148013.42
Step D 74.7186 5977.49 12951.22 155414.69
Step E 78.4544 6276.35 13598.76 163185.15
Step F 82.3769 6590.15 14278.66 171343.95
Step G 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
2540A Environmental Coordinator-A Step A 47.0632 3765.06 8157.62 97891.46 Step B 49.4164 3953.31 8565.51 102786.11
Step C 51.8874 4150.99 8993.82 107925.79
Step D 54.4816 4358.53 9443.48 113321.73
Step E 57.2058 4576.46 9915.67 118988.06
Step F 60.0658 4805.26 10411.41 124936.86
Step G 63.0692 5045.54 10931.99 131183.94
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2546A Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst I-A
Step A 39.0623 3124.98 6770.80 81249.58
Step B 41.0153 3281.22 7109.32 85311.82
Step C 43.0662 3445.30 7464.81 89577.70
Step D 45.2194 3617.55 7838.03 94056.35
Step E 47.4805 3798.44 8229.95 98759.44
Step F 49.8545 3988.36 8641.45 103697.36
Step G 52.3472 4187.78 9073.51 108882.18
2547A Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst II-A
Step A 42.9694 3437.55 7448.03 89376.35
Step B 45.1179 3609.43 7820.44 93845.23
Step C 47.3739 3789.91 8211.48 98537.71
Step D 49.7424 3979.39 8622.02 103464.19
Step E 52.2296 4178.37 9053.13 108637.57
Step F 54.8413 4387.30 9505.83 114069.90
Step G 57.5832 4606.66 9981.09 119773.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1122A Environmental Utilities Business
Services Manager-A
Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18
Step B 60.7396 4859.17 10528.20 126338.37
Step C 63.7766 5102.13 11054.61 132655.33
Step D 66.9654 5357.23 11607.34 139288.03
Step E 70.3136 5625.09 12187.69 146252.29
Step F 73.8294 5906.35 12797.10 153565.15
Step G 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
1684A Environmental Utilities Director-A Step A 92.7804 7422.43 16081.94 192983.23 Step B 97.4193 7793.54 16886.01 202632.14
Step C 102.2904 8183.23 17730.34 212764.03
Step D 107.4048 8592.38 18616.83 223401.98
Step E 112.7751 9022.01 19547.68 234572.21
Step F 118.4139 9473.11 20525.08 246300.91
Step G 124.3345 9946.76 21551.31 258615.76
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1024A Environmental Utilities Maintenance
Superintendent-A
Step A 58.3630 4669.04 10116.25 121395.04
Step B 61.2811 4902.49 10622.06 127464.69
Step C 64.3451 5147.61 11153.15 133837.81
Step D 67.5624 5404.99 11710.82 140529.79
Step E 70.9405 5675.24 12296.35 147556.24
Step F 74.4875 5959.00 12911.17 154934.00
Step G 78.2119 6256.95 13556.73 162680.75
2541A Environmental Utility Compliance
Administrator-A
Step A 48.2377 3859.02 8361.20 100334.42
Step B 50.6495 4051.96 8779.25 105350.96
Step C 53.1819 4254.55 9218.20 110618.35
Step D 55.8411 4467.29 9679.12 116149.49
Step E 58.6330 4690.64 10163.05 121956.64
Step F 61.5647 4925.18 10671.21 128054.58
Step G 64.6428 5171.42 11204.75 134457.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4321A Facilities Supervisor-A Step A 39.4813 3158.50 6843.43 82121.10 Step B 41.4555 3316.44 7185.62 86227.44
Step C 43.5280 3482.24 7544.85 90538.24
Step D 45.7045 3656.36 7922.11 95065.36
Step E 47.9898 3839.18 8318.23 99818.78
Step F 50.3892 4031.14 8734.13 104809.54
Step G 52.9087 4232.70 9170.84 110050.10
2900A Finance Manager-A Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 60.7396 4859.17 10528.20 126338.37
Step C 63.7766 5102.13 11054.61 132655.33
Step D 66.9654 5357.23 11607.34 139288.03
Step E 70.3136 5625.09 12187.69 146252.29
Step F 73.8294 5906.35 12797.10 153565.15
Step G 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905ZA Fire Battalion Chief 8Hr-ZA Step A 57.3325 4586.60 9937.63 119251.60 Step B 60.1991 4815.93 10434.51 125214.13
Step C 63.2090 5056.72 10956.23 131474.72
Step D 66.3695 5309.56 11504.05 138048.56
Step E 69.6881 5575.05 12079.27 144951.25
Step F 73.1724 5853.79 12683.22 152198.59
Step G 76.8308 6146.46 13317.34 159808.06
0905A Fire Battalion Chief-A Step A 40.9517 4586.59 9937.61 119251.35 Step B 42.9993 4815.92 10434.50 125213.96
Step C 45.1493 5056.72 10956.23 131474.76
Step D 47.4068 5309.56 11504.05 138048.60
Step E 49.7771 5575.04 12079.24 144950.92
Step F 52.2660 5853.79 12683.22 152198.59
Step G 54.8793 6146.48 13317.38 159808.52
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3330A Fire Chief-A Step A 84.6369 6770.95 14670.40 176044.75 Step B 88.8689 7109.51 15403.94 184847.31
Step C 93.3121 7464.97 16174.10 194089.17
Step D 97.9779 7838.23 16982.84 203794.03
Step E 102.8768 8230.14 17831.98 213983.74
Step F 108.0203 8641.62 18723.52 224682.22
Step G 113.4214 9073.71 19659.71 235916.51
3332A Fire Division Chief-A Step A 63.0620 5044.96 10930.75 131168.96 Step B 66.2150 5297.20 11477.27 137727.20
Step C 69.5259 5562.07 12051.16 144613.87
Step D 73.0021 5840.17 12653.70 151844.37
Step E 76.6523 6132.18 13286.40 159436.78
Step F 80.4848 6438.78 13950.70 167408.38
Step G 84.5091 6760.73 14648.24 175778.93
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332ZA Fire Divison Chief 24Hr-ZA Step A 45.0443 5044.96 10930.75 131169.00 Step B 47.2965 5297.21 11477.28 137727.41
Step C 49.6612 5562.05 12051.12 144613.41
Step D 52.1443 5840.16 12653.68 151844.20
Step E 54.7515 6132.17 13286.36 159436.37
Step F 57.4891 6438.78 13950.69 167408.26
Step G 60.3635 6760.71 14648.21 175778.51
2565A Fleet Services Supervisor-A Step A 39.1872 3134.98 6792.45 81509.38 Step B 41.1465 3291.72 7132.06 85584.72
Step C 43.2039 3456.31 7488.68 89864.11
Step D 45.3641 3629.13 7863.11 94357.33
Step E 47.6323 3810.58 8256.27 99075.18
Step F 50.0139 4001.11 8669.08 104028.91
Step G 52.5146 4201.17 9102.53 109230.37
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3451A Government Relations AdministratorA Step A 56.4732 4517.86 9788.69 117464.26 Step B 59.2968 4743.74 10278.11 123337.34
Step C 62.2617 4980.94 10792.03 129504.34
Step D 65.3748 5229.98 11331.63 135979.58
Step E 68.6435 5491.48 11898.21 142778.48
Step F 72.0756 5766.05 12493.10 149917.25
Step G 75.6794 6054.35 13117.76 157413.15
1647A Government Relations
Representative I-A
Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11
Step B 39.0640 3125.12 6771.09 81253.12
Step C 41.0171 3281.37 7109.63 85315.57
Step D 43.0682 3445.46 7465.15 89581.86
Step E 45.2216 3617.73 7838.41 94060.93
Step F 47.4827 3798.62 8230.33 98764.02
Step G 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1648A Government Relations
Representative II-A
Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96
Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
3589A Housing Manager-A Step A 51.3387 4107.10 8898.71 106784.50 Step B 53.9076 4312.61 9343.98 112127.81
Step C 56.6033 4528.26 9811.24 117734.86
Step D 59.4332 4754.66 10301.75 123621.06
Step E 62.4047 4992.38 10816.81 129801.78
Step F 65.5253 5242.02 11357.72 136292.62
Step G 68.8013 5504.10 11925.56 143106.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3590A Housing Supervisor-A Step A 42.7824 3422.59 7415.62 88987.39 Step B 44.9215 3593.72 7786.39 93436.72
Step C 47.1674 3773.39 8175.68 98108.19
Step D 49.5260 3962.08 8584.51 103014.08
Step E 52.0020 4160.16 9013.68 108164.16
Step F 54.6023 4368.18 9464.40 113572.78
Step G 57.3324 4586.59 9937.62 119251.39
3594A Human Resources Analyst I-A Step A 37.5613 3004.90 6510.63 78127.50 Step B 39.4394 3155.15 6836.16 82033.95
Step C 41.4113 3312.90 7177.96 86135.50
Step D 43.4820 3478.56 7536.88 90442.56
Step E 45.6561 3652.49 7913.72 94964.69
Step F 47.9387 3835.10 8309.37 99712.50
Step G 50.3357 4026.86 8724.85 104698.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3596A Human Resources Analyst II-A Step A 41.3174 3305.39 7161.68 85940.19 Step B 43.3832 3470.66 7519.75 90237.06
Step C 45.5524 3644.19 7895.75 94748.99
Step D 47.8301 3826.41 8290.55 99486.61
Step E 50.2216 4017.73 8705.08 104460.93
Step F 52.7326 4218.61 9140.32 109683.81
Step G 55.3693 4429.54 9597.35 115168.14
3598A Human Resources Director-A Step A 74.0282 5922.26 12831.55 153978.66 Step B 77.7296 6218.37 13473.13 161677.57
Step C 81.6161 6529.29 14146.79 169761.49
Step D 85.6968 6855.74 14854.11 178249.34
Step E 89.9817 7198.54 15596.83 187161.94
Step F 94.4809 7558.47 16376.69 196520.27
Step G 99.2049 7936.39 17195.52 206346.19
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3599A Human Resources Manager-A Step A 52.2708 4181.66 9060.27 108723.26 Step B 54.8843 4390.74 9513.28 114159.34
Step C 57.6287 4610.30 9988.97 119867.70
Step D 60.5101 4840.81 10488.42 125861.01
Step E 63.5356 5082.85 11012.84 132154.05
Step F 66.7126 5337.01 11563.52 138762.21
Step G 70.0483 5603.86 12141.71 145700.46
1002A Hydrogeologist-A Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.2399 4819.19 10441.58 125298.99
Step C 63.2520 5060.16 10963.68 131564.16
Step D 66.4147 5313.18 11511.88 138142.58
Step E 69.7354 5578.83 12087.47 145049.63
Step F 73.2222 5857.78 12691.85 152302.18
Step G 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3625A Information Security Administrator-A Step A 51.4209 4113.67 8912.96 106955.47 Step B 53.9920 4319.36 9358.61 112303.36
Step C 56.6915 4535.32 9826.53 117918.32
Step D 59.5261 4762.09 10317.86 123814.29
Step E 62.5024 5000.19 10833.75 130004.99
Step F 65.6275 5250.20 11375.43 136505.20
Step G 68.9090 5512.72 11944.23 143330.72
9542A Information Technology Client
Services Supervisor-A
Step A 46.8423 3747.38 8119.33 97431.98
Step B 49.1844 3934.75 8525.30 102303.55
Step C 51.6437 4131.50 8951.57 107418.90
Step D 54.2258 4338.06 9399.14 112789.66
Step E 56.9372 4554.98 9869.11 118429.38
Step F 59.7839 4782.71 10362.54 124350.51
Step G 62.7732 5021.86 10880.69 130568.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3602A Information Technology Program
Manager-A
Step A 51.3060 4104.48 8893.04 106716.48
Step B 53.8711 4309.69 9337.66 112051.89
Step C 56.5645 4525.16 9804.51 117654.16
Step D 59.3928 4751.42 10294.75 123537.02
Step E 62.3624 4988.99 10809.48 129713.79
Step F 65.4806 5238.45 11349.97 136199.65
Step G 68.7547 5500.38 11917.48 143009.78
3810A Key Accounts Representative-A Step A 56.6845 4534.76 9825.31 117903.76 Step B 59.5189 4761.51 10316.61 123799.31
Step C 62.4947 4999.58 10832.41 129988.98
Step D 65.6195 5249.56 11374.05 136488.56
Step E 68.9005 5512.04 11942.75 143313.04
Step F 72.3456 5787.65 12539.90 150478.85
Step G 75.9628 6077.02 13166.89 158002.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4449A Management Analyst - City Manager
Office-A
Step A 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step B 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step C 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step D 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step E 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step F 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
Step G 57.5845 4606.76 9981.31 119775.76
0045A Management Analyst I-A Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.0640 3125.12 6771.09 81253.12
Step C 41.0171 3281.37 7109.63 85315.57
Step D 43.0682 3445.46 7465.15 89581.86
Step E 45.2216 3617.73 7838.41 94060.93
Step F 47.4827 3798.62 8230.33 98764.02
Step G 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0050A Management Analyst II-A Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
5020A Park Development Project Manager IA Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.0640 3125.12 6771.09 81253.12
Step C 41.0171 3281.37 7109.63 85315.57
Step D 43.0682 3445.46 7465.15 89581.86
Step E 45.2216 3617.73 7838.41 94060.93
Step F 47.4827 3798.62 8230.33 98764.02
Step G 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5022A Park Development Project Manager
II-A
Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96
Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
1106A Park Planning and Development
Manager-A
Step A 51.7657 4141.26 8972.72 107672.66
Step B 54.3546 4348.37 9421.46 113057.57
Step C 57.0724 4565.79 9892.55 118710.59
Step D 59.9260 4794.08 10387.17 124646.08
Step E 62.9223 5033.78 10906.53 130878.38
Step F 66.0684 5285.47 11451.86 137422.27
Step G 69.3718 5549.74 12024.45 144293.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5082A Parks Recreation and Libraries
Director-A
Step A 77.7301 6218.41 13473.22 161678.61
Step B 81.6166 6529.33 14146.88 169762.53
Step C 85.6973 6855.78 14854.20 178250.38
Step D 89.9821 7198.57 15596.90 187162.77
Step E 94.4814 7558.51 16376.78 196521.31
Step F 99.2054 7936.43 17195.60 206347.23
Step G 104.1657 8333.26 18055.39 216664.66
9547A Parks Recreation and Libraries
Manager-A
Step A 53.5919 4287.35 9289.26 111471.15
Step B 56.2715 4501.72 9753.73 117044.72
Step C 59.0848 4726.78 10241.37 122896.38
Step D 62.0395 4963.16 10753.51 129042.16
Step E 65.1411 5211.29 11291.12 135493.49
Step F 68.3984 5471.87 11855.72 142268.67
Step G 71.8183 5745.46 12448.51 149382.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9546A Parks Recreation and Libraries
Superintendent-A
Step A 45.0143 3601.14 7802.48 93629.74
Step B 47.2651 3781.21 8192.62 98311.41
Step C 49.6283 3970.26 8602.24 103226.86
Step D 52.1096 4168.77 9032.33 108387.97
Step E 54.7155 4377.24 9484.02 113808.24
Step F 57.4510 4596.08 9958.17 119498.08
Step G 60.3233 4825.86 10456.04 125472.46
5069A Parks Supervisor-A Step A 37.3398 2987.18 6472.23 77666.78 Step B 39.2066 3136.53 6795.81 81549.73
Step C 41.1671 3293.37 7135.63 85627.57
Step D 43.2254 3458.03 7492.40 89908.83
Step E 45.3867 3630.94 7867.03 94404.34
Step F 47.6559 3812.47 8260.36 99124.27
Step G 50.0387 4003.10 8673.37 104080.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1124A Payroll Analyst I-A Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.0640 3125.12 6771.09 81253.12
Step C 41.0171 3281.37 7109.63 85315.57
Step D 43.0682 3445.46 7465.15 89581.86
Step E 45.2216 3617.73 7838.41 94060.93
Step F 47.4827 3798.62 8230.33 98764.02
Step G 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
1125A Payroll Analyst II-A Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9428A Payroll Supervisor-A Step A 47.0629 3765.03 8157.57 97890.83 Step B 49.4161 3953.29 8565.46 102785.49
Step C 51.8869 4150.95 8993.73 107924.75
Step D 54.4812 4358.50 9443.41 113320.90
Step E 57.2053 4576.42 9915.59 118987.02
Step F 60.0656 4805.25 10411.37 124936.45
Step G 63.0689 5045.51 10931.94 131183.31
1501A Permits Supervisor-A Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step C 45.1190 3609.52 7820.63 93847.52
Step D 47.3752 3790.02 8211.70 98540.42
Step E 49.7436 3979.49 8622.22 103466.69
Step F 52.2310 4178.48 9053.37 108640.48
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5309A Planning Manager-A Step A 63.8914 5111.31 11074.51 132894.11 Step B 67.0859 5366.87 11628.22 139538.67
Step C 70.4402 5635.22 12209.63 146515.62
Step D 73.9623 5916.98 12820.13 153841.58
Step E 77.6605 6212.84 13461.15 161533.84
Step F 81.5436 6523.49 14134.22 169610.69
Step G 85.6205 6849.64 14840.89 178090.64
5400A Police Captain-A Step A 70.4811 5638.49 12216.72 146600.69 Step B 74.0050 5920.40 12827.53 153930.40
Step C 77.7053 6216.42 13468.92 161627.02
Step D 81.5907 6527.26 14142.39 169708.66
Step E 85.6702 6853.62 14849.50 178194.02
Step F 89.9536 7196.29 15591.96 187103.49
Step G 94.4513 7556.10 16371.56 196458.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5410A Police Chief-A Step A 91.0614 7284.91 15783.98 189407.71 Step B 95.6146 7649.17 16573.20 198878.37
Step C 100.3952 8031.62 17401.83 208822.02
Step D 105.4151 8433.21 18271.95 219263.41
Step E 110.6858 8854.86 19185.54 230226.46
Step F 116.2202 9297.62 20144.83 241738.02
Step G 122.0311 9762.49 21152.06 253824.69
5420A Police Lieutenant-A Step A 61.2873 4902.98 10623.13 127477.58 Step B 64.3519 5148.15 11154.33 133851.95
Step C 67.5694 5405.55 11712.03 140544.35
Step D 70.9478 5675.82 12297.62 147571.42
Step E 74.4953 5959.62 12912.52 154950.22
Step F 78.2200 6257.60 13558.13 162697.60
Step G 82.1311 6570.49 14236.06 170832.69
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5489A Police Services Administrator-A Step A 53.9435 4315.48 9350.21 112202.48 Step B 56.6407 4531.26 9817.72 117812.66
Step C 59.4727 4757.82 10308.60 123703.22
Step D 62.4464 4995.71 10824.04 129888.51
Step E 65.5687 5245.50 11365.24 136382.90
Step F 68.8471 5507.77 11933.50 143201.97
Step G 72.2895 5783.16 12530.18 150362.16
1039A Police Social Services Practitioner-A Step A 35.3582 2828.66 6128.75 73545.06 Step B 37.1261 2970.09 6435.19 77222.29
Step C 38.9825 3118.60 6756.97 81083.60
Step D 40.9316 3274.53 7094.81 85137.73
Step E 42.9781 3438.25 7449.54 89394.45
Step F 45.1271 3610.17 7822.03 93864.37
Step G 47.3834 3790.67 8213.12 98557.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1126A Police Social Services Supervisor-A Step A 40.6619 3252.95 7048.06 84576.75 Step B 42.6950 3415.60 7400.47 88805.60
Step C 44.8298 3586.38 7770.50 93245.98
Step D 47.0713 3765.70 8159.03 97908.30
Step E 49.4248 3953.98 8566.97 102803.58
Step F 51.8961 4151.69 8995.32 107943.89
Step G 54.4909 4359.27 9445.09 113341.07
5505A Power Engineering Manager-A Step A 81.7450 6539.60 14169.13 170029.60 Step B 85.8323 6866.58 14877.60 178531.18
Step C 90.1239 7209.91 15621.48 187457.71
Step D 94.6301 7570.41 16402.55 196830.61
Step E 99.3617 7948.94 17222.69 206672.34
Step F 104.3297 8346.38 18083.81 217005.78
Step G 109.5461 8763.69 18987.99 227855.89
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5600A Power Generation Superintendent-A Step A 84.3105 6744.84 14613.82 175365.84 Step B 88.5260 7082.08 15344.51 184134.08
Step C 92.9522 7436.18 16111.71 193340.58
Step D 97.5999 7807.99 16917.32 203007.79
Step E 102.4800 8198.40 17763.20 213158.40
Step F 107.6040 8608.32 18651.36 223816.32
Step G 112.9841 9038.73 19583.91 235006.93
5530A Power Plant Operations and
Maintenance Supervisor-A
Step A 76.7661 6141.29 13306.12 159673.49
Step B 80.6045 6448.36 13971.45 167657.36
Step C 84.6347 6770.78 14670.01 176040.18
Step D 88.8664 7109.31 15403.51 184842.11
Step E 93.3098 7464.78 16173.70 194084.38
Step F 97.9752 7838.02 16982.37 203788.42
Step G 102.8740 8229.92 17831.49 213977.92
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5535A Power Supply and Portfolio
Administrator-A
Step A 81.7413 6539.30 14168.49 170021.90
Step B 85.8284 6866.27 14876.92 178523.07
Step C 90.1199 7209.59 15620.78 187449.39
Step D 94.6257 7570.06 16401.79 196821.46
Step E 99.3571 7948.57 17221.90 206662.77
Step F 104.3249 8345.99 18082.98 216995.79
Step G 109.5412 8763.30 18987.14 227845.70
5519A Preventative Maintenance
Supervisor-A
Step A 53.0573 4244.58 9196.60 110359.18
Step B 55.7101 4456.81 9656.42 115877.01
Step C 58.4957 4679.66 10139.25 121671.06
Step D 61.4204 4913.63 10646.20 127754.43
Step E 64.4915 5159.32 11178.53 134142.32
Step F 67.7160 5417.28 11737.44 140849.28
Step G 71.1018 5688.14 12324.31 147891.74
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5514A Principal Engineer-A Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.2399 4819.19 10441.58 125298.99
Step C 63.2520 5060.16 10963.68 131564.16
Step D 66.4147 5313.18 11511.88 138142.58
Step E 69.7354 5578.83 12087.47 145049.63
Step F 73.2222 5857.78 12691.85 152302.18
Step G 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
5513A Principal Planner-A Step A 53.2441 4259.53 9228.98 110747.73 Step B 55.9064 4472.51 9690.44 116285.31
Step C 58.7017 4696.14 10174.96 122099.54
Step D 61.6367 4930.94 10683.69 128204.34
Step E 64.7186 5177.49 11217.89 134614.69
Step F 67.9544 5436.35 11778.76 141345.15
Step G 71.3523 5708.18 12367.73 148412.78
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1114A Principal Power Engineer-A Step A 78.1875 6255.00 13552.50 162630.00 Step B 82.0969 6567.75 14230.13 170761.55
Step C 86.2017 6896.14 14941.63 179299.54
Step D 90.5118 7240.94 15688.71 188264.54
Step E 95.0374 7602.99 16473.15 197677.79
Step F 99.7893 7983.14 17296.81 207561.74
Step G 104.7787 8382.30 18161.64 217939.70
1115A Principal Power Plant Engineer-A Step A 78.1875 6255.00 13552.50 162630.00 Step B 82.0969 6567.75 14230.13 170761.55
Step C 86.2017 6896.14 14941.63 179299.54
Step D 90.5118 7240.94 15688.71 188264.54
Step E 95.0374 7602.99 16473.15 197677.79
Step F 99.7893 7983.14 17296.81 207561.74
Step G 104.7787 8382.30 18161.64 217939.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1004A Process Engineer-A Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.2399 4819.19 10441.58 125298.99
Step C 63.2520 5060.16 10963.68 131564.16
Step D 66.4147 5313.18 11511.88 138142.58
Step E 69.7354 5578.83 12087.47 145049.63
Step F 73.2222 5857.78 12691.85 152302.18
Step G 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
1069A Project Supervisor-A Step A 49.8884 3991.07 8647.32 103767.87 Step B 52.3829 4190.63 9079.70 108956.43
Step C 55.0020 4400.16 9533.68 114404.16
Step D 57.7520 4620.16 10010.35 120124.16
Step E 60.6397 4851.18 10510.88 126130.58
Step F 63.6717 5093.74 11036.43 132437.14
Step G 66.8553 5348.42 11588.25 139059.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1108A Public Affairs and Communications
Manager-A
Step A 55.8098 4464.78 9673.70 116084.38
Step B 58.6004 4688.03 10157.40 121888.83
Step C 61.5303 4922.42 10665.25 127983.02
Step D 64.6069 5168.55 11198.53 134382.35
Step E 67.8372 5426.98 11758.45 141101.38
Step F 71.2291 5698.33 12346.38 148156.53
Step G 74.7906 5983.25 12963.70 155564.45
5635A Public Works Director-A Step A 77.7314 6218.51 13473.44 161681.31 Step B 81.6180 6529.44 14147.12 169765.44
Step C 85.6990 6855.92 14854.49 178253.92
Step D 89.9839 7198.71 15597.21 187166.51
Step E 94.4831 7558.65 16377.07 196524.85
Step F 99.2072 7936.58 17195.91 206350.98
Step G 104.1675 8333.40 18055.70 216668.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1087A Public Works Manager-A Step A 54.8772 4390.18 9512.05 114144.58 Step B 57.6212 4609.70 9987.67 119852.10
Step C 60.5022 4840.18 10487.05 125844.58
Step D 63.5272 5082.18 11011.38 132136.58
Step E 66.7037 5336.30 11561.97 138743.70
Step F 70.0388 5603.10 12140.06 145680.70
Step G 73.5409 5883.27 12747.09 152965.07
5652A Purchasing and Warehouse
Manager-A
Step A 50.6893 4055.14 8786.15 105433.74
Step B 53.2238 4257.90 9225.46 110705.50
Step C 55.8849 4470.79 9686.72 116240.59
Step D 58.6792 4694.34 10171.06 122052.74
Step E 61.6132 4929.06 10679.62 128155.46
Step F 64.6939 5175.51 11213.61 134563.31
Step G 67.9285 5434.28 11774.27 141291.28
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9544A Recreation and Library Supervisor-A Step A 37.3398 2987.18 6472.23 77666.78 Step B 39.2066 3136.53 6795.81 81549.73
Step C 41.1671 3293.37 7135.63 85627.57
Step D 43.2254 3458.03 7492.40 89908.83
Step E 45.3867 3630.94 7867.03 94404.34
Step F 47.6559 3812.47 8260.36 99124.27
Step G 50.0387 4003.10 8673.37 104080.50
6231A Refuse Superintendent-A Step A 47.9372 3834.98 8309.11 99709.38 Step B 50.3341 4026.73 8724.58 104694.93
Step C 52.8508 4228.06 9160.81 109929.66
Step D 55.4935 4439.48 9618.87 115426.48
Step E 58.2680 4661.44 10099.79 121197.44
Step F 61.1815 4894.52 10604.79 127257.52
Step G 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6235A Refuse Supervisor-A Step A 39.7944 3183.55 6897.70 82772.35 Step B 41.7842 3342.74 7242.59 86911.14
Step C 43.8735 3509.88 7604.74 91256.88
Step D 46.0664 3685.31 7984.84 95818.11
Step E 48.3695 3869.56 8384.05 100608.56
Step F 50.7879 4063.03 8803.24 105638.83
Step G 53.3275 4266.20 9243.43 110921.20
6244A Refuse and Stormwater Manager-A Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 67.7722 5421.78 11747.18 140966.18
Step C 71.1603 5692.82 12334.45 148013.42
Step D 74.7186 5977.49 12951.22 155414.69
Step E 78.4544 6276.35 13598.76 163185.15
Step F 82.3769 6590.15 14278.66 171343.95
Step G 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6450A Risk Manager-A Step A 57.4981 4599.85 9966.34 119596.05 Step B 60.3730 4829.84 10464.65 125575.84
Step C 63.3918 5071.34 10987.91 131854.94
Step D 66.5613 5324.90 11537.29 138447.50
Step E 69.8894 5591.15 12114.16 145369.95
Step F 73.3839 5870.71 12719.88 152638.51
Step G 77.0530 6164.24 13355.85 160270.24
6500A Safety Coordinator-A Step A 40.9244 3273.95 7093.56 85122.75 Step B 42.9704 3437.63 7448.20 89378.43
Step C 45.1189 3609.51 7820.61 93847.31
Step D 47.3750 3790.00 8211.67 98540.00
Step E 49.7435 3979.48 8622.21 103466.48
Step F 52.2307 4178.46 9053.32 108639.86
Step G 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7130A Senior Business Systems Analyst-A Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25 Step B 46.8439 3747.51 8119.61 97435.31
Step C 49.1860 3934.88 8525.57 102306.88
Step D 51.6453 4131.62 8951.85 107422.22
Step E 54.2276 4338.21 9399.45 112793.41
Step F 56.9389 4555.11 9869.41 118432.91
Step G 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
7145A Senior Database Analyst-A Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25 Step B 46.8439 3747.51 8119.61 97435.31
Step C 49.1860 3934.88 8525.57 102306.88
Step D 51.6453 4131.62 8951.85 107422.22
Step E 54.2276 4338.21 9399.45 112793.41
Step F 56.9389 4555.11 9869.41 118432.91
Step G 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7123A Senior Deputy City Attorney-A Step A 76.9544 6156.35 13338.76 160065.15 Step B 80.8021 6464.17 14005.70 168068.37
Step C 84.8423 6787.38 14706.00 176471.98
Step D 89.0844 7126.75 15441.30 185295.55
Step E 93.5387 7483.10 16213.37 194560.50
Step F 98.2154 7857.23 17024.00 204288.03
Step G 103.1263 8250.10 17875.23 214502.70
1097A Senior Development Services
Business Analyst-A
Step A 43.8811 3510.49 7606.06 91272.69
Step B 46.0752 3686.02 7986.37 95836.42
Step C 48.3789 3870.31 8385.68 100628.11
Step D 50.7979 4063.83 8804.97 105659.63
Step E 53.3378 4267.02 9245.22 110942.62
Step F 56.0046 4480.37 9707.46 116489.57
Step G 58.8049 4704.39 10192.85 122314.19
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7128A Senior Electric Business Analyst-A Step A 57.5905 4607.24 9982.35 119788.24 Step B 60.4700 4837.60 10481.47 125777.60
Step C 63.4936 5079.49 11005.56 132066.69
Step D 66.6681 5333.45 11555.80 138669.65
Step E 70.0015 5600.12 12133.59 145603.12
Step F 73.5016 5880.13 12740.28 152883.33
Step G 77.1769 6174.15 13377.33 160527.95
1023A Senior Electric Technology Systems
Analyst-A
Step A 59.8944 4791.55 10381.70 124580.35
Step B 62.8891 5031.13 10900.78 130809.33
Step C 66.0336 5282.69 11445.82 137349.89
Step D 69.3353 5546.82 12018.12 144217.42
Step E 72.8020 5824.16 12619.01 151428.16
Step F 76.4421 6115.37 13249.96 158999.57
Step G 80.2642 6421.14 13912.46 166949.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7163A Senior Energy Services Account
Representative-A
Step A 56.6845 4534.76 9825.31 117903.76
Step B 59.5189 4761.51 10316.61 123799.31
Step C 62.4947 4999.58 10832.41 129988.98
Step D 65.6195 5249.56 11374.05 136488.56
Step E 68.9005 5512.04 11942.75 143313.04
Step F 72.3456 5787.65 12539.90 150478.85
Step G 75.9628 6077.02 13166.89 158002.62
7142A Senior Engineer-A Step A 50.9976 4079.81 8839.58 106075.01 Step B 53.5477 4283.82 9281.60 111379.22
Step C 56.2249 4497.99 9745.65 116947.79
Step D 59.0364 4722.91 10232.98 122795.71
Step E 61.9878 4959.02 10744.55 128934.62
Step F 65.0875 5207.00 11281.83 135382.00
Step G 68.3418 5467.34 11845.91 142150.94
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1065A Senior Environmental Utilities
Business Analyst-A
Step A 47.2647 3781.18 8192.55 98310.58
Step B 49.6277 3970.22 8602.13 103225.62
Step C 52.1092 4168.74 9032.26 108387.14
Step D 54.7146 4377.17 9483.86 113806.37
Step E 57.4506 4596.05 9958.10 119497.25
Step F 60.3229 4825.83 10455.97 125471.63
Step G 63.3391 5067.13 10978.78 131745.33
7161A Senior GIS Analyst-A Step A 43.6911 3495.29 7573.12 90877.49 Step B 45.8756 3670.05 7951.77 95421.25
Step C 48.1693 3853.54 8349.35 100192.14
Step D 50.5780 4046.24 8766.85 105202.24
Step E 53.1069 4248.55 9205.20 110462.35
Step F 55.7623 4460.98 9665.47 115985.58
Step G 58.5503 4684.02 10148.72 121784.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7150A Senior Human Resources Analyst-A Step A 45.4521 3636.17 7878.36 94540.37 Step B 47.7245 3817.96 8272.25 99266.96
Step C 50.1109 4008.87 8685.89 104230.67
Step D 52.6163 4209.30 9120.16 109441.90
Step E 55.2472 4419.78 9576.18 114914.18
Step F 58.0096 4640.77 10055.00 120659.97
Step G 60.9099 4872.79 10557.72 126692.59
7194A Senior Information Technology
Analyst-A
Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25
Step B 46.8439 3747.51 8119.61 97435.31
Step C 49.1860 3934.88 8525.57 102306.88
Step D 51.6453 4131.62 8951.85 107422.22
Step E 54.2276 4338.21 9399.45 112793.41
Step F 56.9389 4555.11 9869.41 118432.91
Step G 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1119A Senior Park Development Project
Manager-A
Step A 45.0167 3601.34 7802.89 93634.74
Step B 47.2676 3781.41 8193.05 98316.61
Step C 49.6310 3970.48 8602.71 103232.48
Step D 52.1125 4169.00 9032.83 108394.00
Step E 54.7181 4377.45 9484.47 113813.65
Step F 57.4540 4596.32 9958.69 119504.32
Step G 60.3268 4826.14 10456.65 125479.74
7180A Senior Planner-A Step A 46.3003 3704.02 8025.39 96304.62 Step B 48.6153 3889.22 8426.65 101119.82
Step C 51.0461 4083.69 8847.99 106175.89
Step D 53.5983 4287.86 9290.37 111484.46
Step E 56.2784 4502.27 9754.92 117059.07
Step F 59.0924 4727.39 10242.68 122912.19
Step G 62.0468 4963.74 10754.78 129057.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7151A Senior Power Engineer-A Step A 71.0796 5686.37 12320.46 147845.57 Step B 74.6335 5970.68 12936.47 155237.68
Step C 78.3653 6269.22 13583.32 162999.82
Step D 82.2836 6582.69 14262.49 171149.89
Step E 86.3976 6911.81 14975.58 179707.01
Step F 90.7175 7257.40 15724.37 188692.40
Step G 95.2534 7620.27 16510.59 198127.07
5555A Senior Power Plant Engineer-A Step A 71.0796 5686.37 12320.46 147845.57 Step B 74.6335 5970.68 12936.47 155237.68
Step C 78.3653 6269.22 13583.32 162999.82
Step D 82.2836 6582.69 14262.49 171149.89
Step E 86.3976 6911.81 14975.58 179707.01
Step F 90.7175 7257.40 15724.37 188692.40
Step G 95.2534 7620.27 16510.59 198127.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1029A Senior Utility Billing Analyst-A Step A 44.5864 3566.91 7728.31 92739.71 Step B 46.8158 3745.26 8114.74 97376.86
Step C 49.1566 3932.53 8520.48 102245.73
Step D 51.6144 4129.15 8946.50 107357.95
Step E 54.1952 4335.62 9393.83 112726.02
Step F 56.9049 4552.39 9863.52 118362.19
Step G 59.7501 4780.01 10356.68 124280.21
1073A Street Maintenance Manager-A Step A 57.0743 4565.94 9892.88 118714.54 Step B 59.9279 4794.23 10387.50 124650.03
Step C 62.9245 5033.96 10906.91 130882.96
Step D 66.0706 5285.65 11452.24 137426.85
Step E 69.3741 5549.93 12024.84 144298.13
Step F 72.8428 5827.42 12626.09 151513.02
Step G 76.4850 6118.80 13257.40 159088.80
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7522A Street Maintenance Supervisor-A Step A 37.0884 2967.07 6428.66 77143.87 Step B 38.9428 3115.42 6750.09 81001.02
Step C 40.8899 3271.19 7087.58 85050.99
Step D 42.9345 3434.76 7441.98 89303.76
Step E 45.0812 3606.50 7814.07 93768.90
Step F 47.3353 3786.82 8204.79 98457.42
Step G 49.7019 3976.15 8615.00 103379.95
1110A Transit Operations Supervisor-A Step A 45.0168 3601.34 7802.91 93634.94 Step B 47.2675 3781.40 8193.03 98316.40
Step C 49.6309 3970.47 8602.69 103232.27
Step D 52.1126 4169.01 9032.85 108394.21
Step E 54.7182 4377.46 9484.49 113813.86
Step F 57.4541 4596.33 9958.71 119504.53
Step G 60.3267 4826.14 10456.63 125479.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8762A Urban Forester-A Step A 38.8334 3106.67 6731.12 80773.47 Step B 40.7748 3261.98 7067.63 84811.58
Step C 42.8137 3425.10 7421.04 89052.50
Step D 44.9544 3596.35 7792.10 93505.15
Step E 47.2022 3776.18 8181.71 98180.58
Step F 49.5621 3964.97 8590.76 103089.17
Step G 52.0402 4163.22 9020.30 108243.62
0920A Utility Billing Operations Manager-A Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 60.7396 4859.17 10528.20 126338.37
Step C 63.7766 5102.13 11054.61 132655.33
Step D 66.9654 5357.23 11607.34 139288.03
Step E 70.3136 5625.09 12187.69 146252.29
Step F 73.8294 5906.35 12797.10 153565.15
Step G 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1041A Utility Billing and Field Services
Supervisor-A
Step A 44.1208 3529.66 7647.61 91771.26
Step B 46.3268 3706.14 8029.98 96359.74
Step C 48.6431 3891.45 8431.47 101177.65
Step D 51.0752 4086.02 8853.03 106236.42
Step E 53.6290 4290.32 9295.69 111548.32
Step F 56.3105 4504.84 9760.49 117125.84
Step G 59.1260 4730.08 10248.51 122982.08
1042A Utility Customer Service Supervisor-A Step A 32.1431 2571.45 5571.47 66857.65 Step B 33.7501 2700.01 5850.02 70200.21
Step C 35.4377 2835.02 6142.53 73710.42
Step D 37.2095 2976.76 6449.65 77395.76
Step E 39.0700 3125.60 6772.13 81265.60
Step F 41.0236 3281.89 7110.76 85329.09
Step G 43.0748 3445.98 7466.30 89595.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1102A Utility Exploration Center SupervisorA Step A 38.3480 3067.84 6646.99 79763.84 Step B 40.2651 3221.21 6979.28 83751.41
Step C 42.2785 3382.28 7328.27 87939.28
Step D 44.3925 3551.40 7694.70 92336.40
Step E 46.6121 3728.97 8079.43 96953.17
Step F 48.9426 3915.41 8483.38 101800.61
Step G 51.3897 4111.18 8907.55 106890.58
1646A Utility Government Relations
Administrator-A
Step A 49.1077 3928.62 8512.00 102144.02
Step B 51.5631 4125.05 8937.60 107251.25
Step C 54.1411 4331.29 9384.46 112613.49
Step D 56.8482 4547.86 9853.69 118244.26
Step E 59.6906 4775.25 10346.37 124156.45
Step F 62.6752 5014.02 10863.70 130364.42
Step G 65.8089 5264.71 11406.88 136882.51
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8980A Wastewater Collection
Superintendent-A
Step A 47.9372 3834.98 8309.11 99709.38
Step B 50.3341 4026.73 8724.58 104694.93
Step C 52.8508 4228.06 9160.81 109929.66
Step D 55.4935 4439.48 9618.87 115426.48
Step E 58.2680 4661.44 10099.79 121197.44
Step F 61.1815 4894.52 10604.79 127257.52
Step G 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
8978A Wastewater Collection Supervisor-A Step A 39.9500 3196.00 6924.67 83096.00 Step B 41.9471 3355.77 7270.83 87249.97
Step C 44.0447 3523.58 7634.41 91612.98
Step D 46.2469 3699.75 8016.13 96193.55
Step E 48.5593 3884.74 8416.95 101003.34
Step F 50.9870 4078.96 8837.75 106052.96
Step G 53.5364 4282.91 9279.64 111355.71
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9040A Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-A
Step A 52.7315 4218.52 9140.13 109681.52
Step B 55.3683 4429.46 9597.17 115166.06
Step C 58.1364 4650.91 10076.98 120923.71
Step D 61.0435 4883.48 10580.87 126970.48
Step E 64.0954 5127.63 11109.87 133318.43
Step F 67.3002 5384.02 11665.37 139984.42
Step G 70.6651 5653.21 12248.62 146983.41
9045A Wastewater Utility Manager-A Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 67.7722 5421.78 11747.18 140966.18
Step C 71.1603 5692.82 12334.45 148013.42
Step D 74.7186 5977.49 12951.22 155414.69
Step E 78.4544 6276.35 13598.76 163185.15
Step F 82.3769 6590.15 14278.66 171343.95
Step G 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9047A Water Conservation Administrator-A Step A 43.9422 3515.38 7616.65 91399.78 Step B 46.1394 3691.15 7997.50 95969.95
Step C 48.4464 3875.71 8397.38 100768.51
Step D 50.8687 4069.50 8817.24 105806.90
Step E 53.4121 4272.97 9258.10 111097.17
Step F 56.0831 4486.65 9721.07 116652.85
Step G 58.8870 4710.96 10207.08 122484.96
9085A Water Distribution Superintendent-A Step A 47.2302 3778.42 8186.57 98238.82 Step B 50.3341 4026.73 8724.58 104694.93
Step C 52.8508 4228.06 9160.81 109929.66
Step D 55.4935 4439.48 9618.87 115426.48
Step E 58.2680 4661.44 10099.79 121197.44
Step F 61.1815 4894.52 10604.79 127257.52
Step G 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9084A Water Distribution Supervisor-A Step A 39.9499 3195.99 6924.65 83095.79 Step B 41.9471 3355.77 7270.83 87249.97
Step C 44.0447 3523.58 7634.41 91612.98
Step D 46.2469 3699.75 8016.13 96193.55
Step E 48.5592 3884.74 8416.93 101003.14
Step F 50.9870 4078.96 8837.75 106052.96
Step G 53.5364 4282.91 9279.64 111355.71
9101A Water Quality Lab Supervisor-A Step A 41.9458 3355.66 7270.61 87247.26 Step B 44.0430 3523.44 7634.12 91609.44
Step C 46.2451 3699.61 8015.82 96189.81
Step D 48.5573 3884.58 8416.60 100999.18
Step E 50.9853 4078.82 8837.45 106049.42
Step F 53.5346 4282.77 9279.33 111351.97
Step G 56.2112 4496.90 9743.27 116919.30
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-A
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9175A Water Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-A
Step A 47.9376 3835.01 8309.18 99710.21
Step B 50.3347 4026.78 8724.68 104696.18
Step C 52.8512 4228.10 9160.87 109930.50
Step D 55.4940 4439.52 9618.96 115427.52
Step E 58.2685 4661.48 10099.87 121198.48
Step F 61.1821 4894.57 10604.90 127258.77
Step G 64.2411 5139.29 11135.12 133621.49
9244A Water Utility Manager-A Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 67.7722 5421.78 11747.18 140966.18
Step C 71.1603 5692.82 12334.45 148013.42
Step D 74.7186 5977.49 12951.22 155414.69
Step E 78.4544 6276.35 13598.76 163185.15
Step F 82.3769 6590.15 14278.66 171343.95
Step G 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1505B AMI Project Manager-B Step A 52.3163 4185.30 9068.16 108817.90 Step B 55.3445 4427.56 9593.05 115116.56
Step C 57.0049 4560.39 9880.85 118570.19
Step D 58.7150 4697.20 10177.27 122127.20
Step E 60.4765 4838.12 10482.59 125791.12
Step F 62.2908 4983.26 10797.07 129564.86
Step G 64.1595 5132.76 11120.98 133451.76
Step H 66.0843 5286.74 11454.61 137455.34
Step I 68.0668 5445.34 11798.25 141578.94
Step J 70.1088 5608.70 12152.19 145826.30
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1370B Accounting Manager-B Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 61.1956 4895.65 10607.24 127286.85
Step C 63.0315 5042.52 10925.46 131105.52
Step D 64.9224 5193.79 11253.22 135038.59
Step E 66.8701 5349.61 11590.82 139089.81
Step F 68.8762 5510.10 11938.54 143262.50
Step G 70.9426 5675.41 12296.72 147560.61
Step H 73.0708 5845.66 12665.61 151987.26
Step I 75.2630 6021.04 13045.59 156547.04
Step J 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0043B Accounting Supervisor-B Step A 48.5327 3882.62 8412.33 100948.02 Step B 51.3421 4107.37 8899.30 106791.57
Step C 52.8823 4230.58 9166.27 109995.18
Step D 54.4688 4357.50 9441.26 113295.10
Step E 56.1029 4488.23 9724.50 116694.03
Step F 57.7860 4622.88 10016.24 120194.88
Step G 59.5195 4761.56 10316.71 123800.56
Step H 61.3051 4904.41 10626.22 127514.61
Step I 63.1443 5051.54 10945.01 131340.14
Step J 65.0386 5203.09 11273.36 135280.29
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9427B Accounts Payable Supervisor-B Step A 46.2214 3697.71 8011.71 96140.51 Step B 48.8968 3911.74 8475.45 101705.34
Step C 50.3637 4029.10 8729.71 104756.50
Step D 51.8746 4149.97 8991.60 107899.17
Step E 53.4309 4274.47 9261.36 111136.27
Step F 55.0338 4402.70 9539.19 114470.30
Step G 56.6848 4534.78 9825.37 117904.38
Step H 58.3853 4670.82 10120.12 121441.42
Step I 60.1369 4810.95 10423.73 125084.75
Step J 61.9410 4955.28 10736.44 128837.28
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0090B Alternative Transportation Manager-B Step A 61.5691 4925.53 10671.98 128063.73 Step B 65.1329 5210.63 11289.70 135476.43
Step C 67.0869 5366.95 11628.40 139540.75
Step D 69.0996 5527.97 11977.26 143727.17
Step E 71.1725 5693.80 12336.57 148038.80
Step F 73.3077 5864.62 12706.67 152480.02
Step G 75.5070 6040.56 13087.88 157054.56
Step H 77.7721 6221.77 13480.50 161765.97
Step I 80.1053 6408.42 13884.92 166619.02
Step J 82.5084 6600.67 14301.46 171617.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0245B Assistant City Attorney-B Step A 88.4976 7079.81 15339.58 184075.01 Step B 93.6202 7489.62 16227.50 194730.02
Step C 96.4287 7714.30 16714.31 200571.70
Step D 99.3217 7945.74 17215.76 206589.14
Step E 102.3013 8184.10 17732.23 212786.70
Step F 105.3703 8429.62 18264.19 219170.22
Step G 108.5314 8682.51 18812.11 225745.31
Step H 111.7874 8942.99 19376.48 232517.79
Step I 115.1409 9211.27 19957.76 239493.07
Step J 118.5952 9487.62 20556.50 246678.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0250B Assistant City Clerk-B Step A 47.0617 3764.94 8157.36 97888.34 Step B 49.7859 3982.87 8629.56 103554.67
Step C 51.2795 4102.36 8888.45 106661.36
Step D 52.8179 4225.43 9155.10 109861.23
Step E 54.4025 4352.20 9429.77 113157.20
Step F 56.0346 4482.77 9712.66 116551.97
Step G 57.7156 4617.25 10004.04 120048.45
Step H 59.4470 4755.76 10304.15 123649.76
Step I 61.2305 4898.44 10613.29 127359.44
Step J 63.0674 5045.39 10931.68 131180.19
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0325B Assistant City Manager-B Step A 93.1372 7450.98 16143.78 193725.38 Step B 98.5283 7882.26 17078.24 204938.86
Step C 101.4841 8118.73 17590.58 211086.93
Step D 104.5286 8362.29 18118.29 217419.49
Step E 107.6645 8613.16 18661.85 223942.16
Step F 110.8944 8871.55 19221.70 230660.35
Step G 114.2212 9137.70 19798.34 237580.10
Step H 117.6478 9411.82 20392.29 244707.42
Step I 121.1773 9694.18 21004.07 252048.78
Step J 124.8126 9985.01 21634.18 259610.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1021B Assistant City Manager/Chief
Financial Officer-B
Step A 93.1372 7450.98 16143.78 193725.38
Step B 98.5283 7882.26 17078.24 204938.86
Step C 101.4841 8118.73 17590.58 211086.93
Step D 104.5286 8362.29 18118.29 217419.49
Step E 107.6645 8613.16 18661.85 223942.16
Step F 110.8944 8871.55 19221.70 230660.35
Step G 114.2212 9137.70 19798.34 237580.10
Step H 117.6478 9411.82 20392.29 244707.42
Step I 121.1773 9694.18 21004.07 252048.78
Step J 124.8126 9985.01 21634.18 259610.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1068B Assistant Electric Analyst-B Step A 36.0568 2884.54 6249.85 74998.14 Step B 38.1440 3051.52 6611.63 79339.52
Step C 39.2883 3143.06 6809.97 81719.66
Step D 40.4669 3237.35 7014.26 84171.15
Step E 41.6810 3334.48 7224.71 86696.48
Step F 42.9313 3434.50 7441.43 89297.10
Step G 44.2193 3537.54 7664.68 91976.14
Step H 45.5459 3643.67 7894.62 94735.47
Step I 46.9123 3752.98 8131.47 97577.58
Step J 48.3196 3865.57 8375.40 100504.77
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0395B Assistant Electric Utility Director-B Step A 102.2264 8178.11 17719.24 212630.91 Step B 108.1438 8651.50 18744.93 224939.10
Step C 111.3882 8911.06 19307.29 231687.46
Step D 114.7297 9178.38 19886.48 238637.78
Step E 118.1717 9453.74 20483.09 245797.14
Step F 121.7168 9737.34 21097.58 253170.94
Step G 125.3683 10029.46 21730.51 260766.06
Step H 129.1294 10330.35 22382.43 268589.15
Step I 133.0032 10640.26 23053.89 276646.66
Step J 136.9934 10959.47 23745.52 284946.27
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0411B Assistant Environmental Utilities
Director-B
Step A 74.2299 5938.39 12866.52 154398.19
Step B 78.5267 6282.14 13611.29 163335.54
Step C 80.8824 6470.59 14019.62 168235.39
Step D 83.3089 6664.71 14440.21 173282.51
Step E 85.8082 6864.66 14873.42 178481.06
Step F 88.3825 7070.60 15319.63 183835.60
Step G 91.0339 7282.71 15779.21 189350.51
Step H 93.7649 7501.19 16252.58 195030.99
Step I 96.5779 7726.23 16740.17 200882.03
Step J 99.4752 7958.02 17242.37 206908.42
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1026B Assistant Finance Director-B Step A 66.5234 5321.87 11530.72 138368.67 Step B 70.3740 5629.92 12198.16 146377.92
Step C 72.4853 5798.82 12564.12 150769.42
Step D 74.6599 5972.79 12941.05 155292.59
Step E 76.8996 6151.97 13329.26 159951.17
Step F 79.2066 6336.53 13729.14 164749.73
Step G 81.5829 6526.63 14141.04 169692.43
Step H 84.0303 6722.42 14565.25 174783.02
Step I 86.5512 6924.10 15002.21 180026.50
Step J 89.1478 7131.82 15452.29 185427.42
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0480B Assistant Fire Chief-B Step A 69.3681 5549.45 12023.80 144285.65 Step B 73.3836 5870.69 12719.82 152637.89
Step C 75.5851 6046.81 13101.42 157217.01
Step D 77.8526 6228.21 13494.45 161933.41
Step E 80.1882 6415.06 13899.29 166791.46
Step F 82.5939 6607.51 14316.28 171795.31
Step G 85.0716 6805.73 14745.74 176948.93
Step H 87.6238 7009.90 15188.13 182257.50
Step I 90.2525 7220.20 15643.77 187725.20
Step J 92.9601 7436.81 16113.08 193357.01
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0484B Assistant Human Resources DirectorB Step A 59.2210 4737.68 10264.97 123179.68 Step B 62.6489 5011.91 10859.14 130309.71
Step C 64.5284 5162.27 11184.92 134219.07
Step D 66.4643 5317.14 11520.48 138245.74
Step E 68.4582 5476.66 11866.09 142393.06
Step F 70.5119 5640.95 12222.06 146664.75
Step G 72.6273 5810.18 12588.73 151064.78
Step H 74.8061 5984.49 12966.39 155596.69
Step I 77.0503 6164.02 13355.39 160264.62
Step J 79.3618 6348.94 13756.05 165072.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9558B Assistant Information Technology
Director-B
Step A 65.1445 5211.56 11291.71 135500.56
Step B 68.9153 5513.22 11945.32 143343.82
Step C 70.9828 5678.62 12303.69 147644.22
Step D 73.1123 5848.98 12672.80 152073.58
Step E 75.3057 6024.46 13052.99 156635.86
Step F 77.5647 6205.18 13444.55 161334.58
Step G 79.8917 6391.34 13847.89 166174.74
Step H 82.2885 6583.08 14263.34 171160.08
Step I 84.7571 6780.57 14691.23 176294.77
Step J 87.2999 6983.99 15131.98 181583.79
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0510B Assistant Police Chief-B Step A 81.0476 6483.81 14048.25 168579.01 Step B 85.7390 6859.12 14861.43 178337.12
Step C 88.3111 7064.89 15307.26 183687.09
Step D 90.9605 7276.84 15766.49 189197.84
Step E 93.6892 7495.14 16239.46 194873.54
Step F 96.4999 7719.99 16726.65 200719.79
Step G 99.3949 7951.59 17228.45 206741.39
Step H 102.3768 8190.14 17745.31 212943.74
Step I 105.4480 8435.84 18277.65 219331.84
Step J 108.6115 8688.92 18825.99 225911.92
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0086B Assistant Transportation Planner-B Step A 37.2032 2976.26 6448.55 77382.66 Step B 39.3568 3148.54 6821.85 81862.14
Step C 40.5375 3243.00 7026.50 84318.00
Step D 41.7537 3340.30 7237.31 86847.70
Step E 43.0062 3440.50 7454.41 89452.90
Step F 44.2964 3543.71 7678.04 92136.51
Step G 45.6253 3650.02 7908.39 94900.62
Step H 46.9941 3759.53 8145.64 97747.73
Step I 48.4039 3872.31 8390.01 100680.11
Step J 49.8560 3988.48 8641.71 103700.48
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1067B Associate Electric Analyst-B Step A 39.6624 3172.99 6874.82 82497.79 Step B 41.9584 3356.67 7272.79 87273.47
Step C 43.2171 3457.37 7490.96 89891.57
Step D 44.5137 3561.10 7715.71 92588.50
Step E 45.8490 3667.92 7947.16 95365.92
Step F 47.2245 3777.96 8185.58 98226.96
Step G 48.6412 3891.30 8431.14 101173.70
Step H 50.1005 4008.04 8684.09 104209.04
Step I 51.6035 4128.28 8944.61 107335.28
Step J 53.1516 4252.13 9212.94 110555.33
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0088B Associate Transportation Planner-B Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0910B Budget Analyst I-B Step A 39.0623 3124.98 6770.80 81249.58 Step B 41.3233 3305.86 7162.71 85952.46
Step C 42.5630 3405.04 7377.59 88531.04
Step D 43.8399 3507.19 7598.92 91186.99
Step E 45.1551 3612.41 7826.88 93922.61
Step F 46.5098 3720.78 8061.70 96740.38
Step G 47.9051 3832.41 8303.55 99642.61
Step H 49.3423 3947.38 8552.67 102631.98
Step I 50.8225 4065.80 8809.23 105710.80
Step J 52.3472 4187.78 9073.51 108882.18
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0915B Budget Analyst II-B Step A 42.9694 3437.55 7448.03 89376.35 Step B 45.4568 3636.54 7879.18 94550.14
Step C 46.8204 3745.63 8115.54 97386.43
Step D 48.2250 3858.00 8359.00 100308.00
Step E 49.6718 3973.74 8609.78 103317.34
Step F 51.1620 4092.96 8868.08 106416.96
Step G 52.6968 4215.74 9134.11 109609.34
Step H 54.2777 4342.22 9408.13 112897.62
Step I 55.9060 4472.48 9690.37 116284.48
Step J 57.5832 4606.66 9981.09 119773.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0930B Budget Manager-B Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 61.1956 4895.65 10607.24 127286.85
Step C 63.0315 5042.52 10925.46 131105.52
Step D 64.9224 5193.79 11253.22 135038.59
Step E 66.8701 5349.61 11590.82 139089.81
Step F 68.8762 5510.10 11938.54 143262.50
Step G 70.9426 5675.41 12296.72 147560.61
Step H 73.0708 5845.66 12665.61 151987.26
Step I 75.2630 6021.04 13045.59 156547.04
Step J 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1017B Building Inspection Supervisor-B Step A 46.3003 3704.02 8025.39 96304.62 Step B 48.9804 3918.43 8489.94 101879.23
Step C 50.4498 4035.98 8744.63 104935.58
Step D 51.9632 4157.06 9006.95 108083.46
Step E 53.5221 4281.77 9277.16 111325.97
Step F 55.1278 4410.22 9555.49 114665.82
Step G 56.7816 4542.53 9842.14 118105.73
Step H 58.4851 4678.81 10137.42 121649.01
Step I 60.2396 4819.17 10441.53 125298.37
Step J 62.0468 4963.74 10754.78 129057.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1043B Building Official-B Step A 61.6607 4932.86 10687.85 128254.26 Step B 65.2298 5218.38 11306.50 135677.98
Step C 67.1867 5374.94 11645.69 139748.34
Step D 69.2022 5536.18 11995.05 143940.58
Step E 71.2783 5702.26 12354.91 148258.86
Step F 73.4166 5873.33 12725.54 152706.53
Step G 75.6191 6049.53 13107.31 157287.73
Step H 77.8877 6231.02 13500.53 162006.42
Step I 80.2244 6417.95 13905.56 166866.75
Step J 82.6311 6610.49 14322.72 171872.69
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1180B Chief Information Officer-B Step A 81.4308 6514.46 14114.67 169376.06 Step B 86.1443 6891.54 14931.68 179180.14
Step C 88.7286 7098.29 15379.62 184555.49
Step D 91.3905 7311.24 15841.02 190092.24
Step E 94.1323 7530.58 16316.27 195795.18
Step F 96.9562 7756.50 16805.74 201668.90
Step G 99.8649 7989.19 17309.92 207718.99
Step H 102.8609 8228.87 17829.22 213950.67
Step I 105.9466 8475.73 18364.08 220368.93
Step J 109.1251 8730.01 18915.02 226980.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1220B City Clerk-B Step A 64.2382 5139.06 11134.62 133615.46 Step B 67.9565 5436.52 11779.13 141349.52
Step C 69.9953 5599.62 12132.52 145590.22
Step D 72.0952 5767.62 12496.50 149958.02
Step E 74.2580 5940.64 12871.39 154456.64
Step F 76.4857 6118.86 13257.52 159090.26
Step G 78.7803 6302.42 13655.25 163863.02
Step H 81.1437 6491.50 14064.91 168778.90
Step I 83.5780 6686.24 14486.85 173842.24
Step J 86.0854 6886.83 14921.47 179057.63
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1368B Code Enforcement Supervisor-B Step A 42.5923 3407.38 7382.67 88591.98 Step B 45.0577 3604.62 7810.00 93720.02
Step C 46.4095 3712.76 8044.31 96531.76
Step D 47.8018 3824.14 8285.65 99427.74
Step E 49.2358 3938.86 8534.21 102410.46
Step F 50.7129 4057.03 8790.24 105482.83
Step G 52.2343 4178.74 9053.95 108647.34
Step H 53.8014 4304.11 9325.58 111906.91
Step I 55.4153 4433.22 9605.32 115263.82
Step J 57.0778 4566.22 9893.49 118721.82
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1027B Construction Inspection
Superintendent-B
Step A 47.3489 3787.91 8207.14 98485.71
Step B 50.0898 4007.18 8682.23 104186.78
Step C 51.5925 4127.40 8942.70 107312.40
Step D 53.1403 4251.22 9210.99 110531.82
Step E 54.7345 4378.76 9487.31 113847.76
Step F 56.3765 4510.12 9771.93 117263.12
Step G 58.0678 4645.42 10065.09 120781.02
Step H 59.8099 4784.79 10367.05 124404.59
Step I 61.6042 4928.34 10678.06 128136.74
Step J 63.4523 5076.18 10998.40 131980.78
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3740B Cultural Arts Supervisor-B Step A 33.4672 2677.38 5800.98 69611.78 Step B 35.4048 2832.38 6136.83 73641.98
Step C 36.4669 2917.35 6320.93 75851.15
Step D 37.5609 3004.87 6510.56 78126.67
Step E 38.6877 3095.02 6705.87 80470.42
Step F 39.8484 3187.87 6907.06 82884.67
Step G 41.0438 3283.50 7114.26 85371.10
Step H 42.2751 3382.01 7327.68 87932.21
Step I 43.5434 3483.47 7547.52 90570.27
Step J 44.8497 3587.98 7773.95 93287.38
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1025B Custodian Supervisor-B Step A 24.9933 1999.46 4332.17 51986.06 Step B 26.4400 2115.20 4582.93 54995.20
Step C 27.2331 2178.65 4720.40 56644.85
Step D 28.0502 2244.02 4862.03 58344.42
Step E 28.8916 2311.33 5007.88 60094.53
Step F 29.7584 2380.67 5158.12 61897.47
Step G 30.6511 2452.09 5312.86 63754.29
Step H 31.5706 2525.65 5472.24 65666.85
Step I 32.5178 2601.42 5636.42 67637.02
Step J 33.4933 2679.46 5805.51 69666.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9561B Data Management System
Administrator-B
Step A 54.6139 4369.11 9466.41 113596.91
Step B 57.7752 4622.02 10014.37 120172.42
Step C 59.5085 4760.68 10314.81 123777.68
Step D 61.2938 4903.50 10624.26 127491.10
Step E 63.1325 5050.60 10942.97 131315.60
Step F 65.0265 5202.12 11271.26 135255.12
Step G 66.9774 5358.19 11609.42 139312.99
Step H 68.9866 5518.93 11957.68 143492.13
Step I 71.0563 5684.50 12316.43 147797.10
Step J 73.1880 5855.04 12685.92 152231.04
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1645B Department Public Information
Officer-B
Step A 48.5318 3882.54 8412.18 100946.14
Step B 51.3411 4107.29 8899.12 106789.49
Step C 52.8813 4230.50 9166.09 109993.10
Step D 54.4678 4357.42 9441.09 113293.02
Step E 56.1018 4488.14 9724.31 116691.74
Step F 57.7849 4622.79 10016.05 120192.59
Step G 59.5184 4761.47 10316.52 123798.27
Step H 61.3040 4904.32 10626.03 127512.32
Step I 63.1431 5051.45 10944.80 131337.65
Step J 65.0374 5202.99 11273.15 135277.79
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1655B Deputy City Attorney I-B Step A 63.5988 5087.90 11023.79 132285.50 Step B 67.2801 5382.41 11661.88 139942.61
Step C 69.2984 5543.87 12011.72 144140.67
Step D 71.3775 5710.20 12372.10 148465.20
Step E 73.5187 5881.50 12743.24 152918.90
Step F 75.7243 6057.94 13125.55 157506.54
Step G 77.9961 6239.69 13519.32 162231.89
Step H 80.3359 6426.87 13924.89 167098.67
Step I 82.7460 6619.68 14342.64 172111.68
Step J 85.2284 6818.27 14772.92 177275.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1658B Deputy City Attorney II-B Step A 69.9587 5596.70 12126.17 145514.10 Step B 74.0081 5920.65 12828.07 153936.85
Step C 76.2283 6098.26 13212.91 158554.86
Step D 78.5152 6281.22 13609.30 163311.62
Step E 80.8706 6469.65 14017.57 168210.85
Step F 83.2968 6663.74 14438.11 173257.34
Step G 85.7956 6863.65 14871.24 178454.85
Step H 88.3696 7069.57 15317.40 183808.77
Step I 91.0206 7281.65 15776.90 189322.85
Step J 93.7513 7500.10 16250.23 195002.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1659B Deputy City Manager-B Step A 70.6621 5652.97 12248.10 146977.17 Step B 74.7523 5980.18 12957.07 155484.78
Step C 76.9949 6159.59 13345.78 160149.39
Step D 79.3046 6344.37 13746.13 164953.57
Step E 81.6838 6534.70 14158.53 169902.30
Step F 84.1343 6730.74 14583.28 174999.34
Step G 86.6584 6932.67 15020.79 180249.47
Step H 89.2582 7140.66 15471.42 185657.06
Step I 91.9359 7354.87 15935.56 191226.67
Step J 94.6939 7575.51 16413.61 196963.31
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1280B Development Services AdministratorB Step A 47.5407 3803.26 8240.39 98884.66 Step B 50.2926 4023.41 8717.38 104608.61
Step C 51.8013 4144.10 8978.89 107746.70
Step D 53.3553 4268.42 9248.25 110979.02
Step E 54.9560 4396.48 9525.71 114308.48
Step F 56.6047 4528.38 9811.48 117737.78
Step G 58.3028 4664.22 10105.82 121269.82
Step H 60.0519 4804.15 10409.00 124907.95
Step I 61.8534 4948.27 10721.26 128655.07
Step J 63.7090 5096.72 11042.89 132514.72
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1676B Development Services Director-B Step A 77.7295 6218.36 13473.11 161677.36 Step B 82.2287 6578.30 14252.97 171035.70
Step C 84.6956 6775.65 14680.57 176166.85
Step D 87.2365 6978.92 15120.99 181451.92
Step E 89.8536 7188.29 15574.62 186895.49
Step F 92.5492 7403.94 16041.86 192502.34
Step G 95.3256 7626.05 16523.10 198277.25
Step H 98.1854 7854.83 17018.80 204225.63
Step I 101.1310 8090.48 17529.37 210352.48
Step J 104.1649 8333.19 18055.25 216662.99
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1695B Development Services Manager-B Step A 56.5718 4525.74 9805.78 117669.34 Step B 59.8465 4787.72 10373.39 124480.72
Step C 61.6419 4931.35 10684.60 128215.15
Step D 63.4911 5079.29 11005.12 132061.49
Step E 65.3959 5231.67 11335.29 136023.47
Step F 67.3577 5388.62 11675.33 140104.02
Step G 69.3785 5550.28 12025.61 144307.28
Step H 71.4599 5716.79 12386.38 148636.59
Step I 73.6036 5888.29 12757.96 153095.49
Step J 75.8118 6064.94 13140.71 157688.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2415B EMS Quality Assurance CoordinatorB Step A 50.7137 4057.10 8790.37 105484.50 Step B 53.6493 4291.94 9299.21 111590.54
Step C 55.2588 4420.70 9578.19 114938.30
Step D 56.9165 4553.32 9865.53 118386.32
Step E 58.6240 4689.92 10161.49 121937.92
Step F 60.3827 4830.62 10466.33 125596.02
Step G 62.1943 4975.54 10780.35 129364.14
Step H 64.0601 5124.81 11103.75 133245.01
Step I 65.9819 5278.55 11436.86 137242.35
Step J 67.9613 5436.90 11779.96 141359.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6520B ERP Program Manager-B Step A 51.3060 4104.48 8893.04 106716.48 Step B 54.2756 4342.05 9407.77 112893.25
Step C 55.9039 4472.31 9690.01 116280.11
Step D 57.5809 4606.47 9980.69 119768.27
Step E 59.3084 4744.67 10280.12 123361.47
Step F 61.0877 4887.02 10588.53 127062.42
Step G 62.9203 5033.62 10906.19 130874.22
Step H 64.8079 5184.63 11233.37 134800.43
Step I 66.7521 5340.17 11570.36 138844.37
Step J 68.7547 5500.38 11917.48 143009.78
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1674B Economic Development Analyst I-B Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.3574 3148.59 6821.95 81863.39
Step C 40.5382 3243.06 7026.62 84319.46
Step D 41.7543 3340.34 7237.41 86848.94
Step E 43.0069 3440.55 7454.53 89454.35
Step F 44.2971 3543.77 7678.16 92137.97
Step G 45.6261 3650.09 7908.52 94902.29
Step H 46.9948 3759.58 8145.77 97749.18
Step I 48.4047 3872.38 8390.15 100681.78
Step J 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1675B Economic Development Analyst II-B Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1710B Economic Development Director-B Step A 74.0306 5922.45 12831.97 153983.65 Step B 78.3160 6265.28 13574.77 162897.28
Step C 80.6655 6453.24 13982.02 167784.24
Step D 83.0855 6646.84 14401.49 172817.84
Step E 85.5780 6846.24 14833.52 178002.24
Step F 88.1454 7051.63 15278.54 183342.43
Step G 90.7897 7263.18 15736.88 188842.58
Step H 93.5134 7481.07 16208.99 194507.87
Step I 96.3188 7705.50 16695.26 200343.10
Step J 99.2084 7936.67 17196.12 206353.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1001B Economic Development Project
Manager-B
Step A 51.3427 4107.42 8899.40 106792.82
Step B 54.3146 4345.17 9414.53 112974.37
Step C 55.9440 4475.52 9696.96 116363.52
Step D 57.6224 4609.79 9987.88 119854.59
Step E 59.3510 4748.08 10287.51 123450.08
Step F 61.1315 4890.52 10596.13 127153.52
Step G 62.9655 5037.24 10914.02 130968.24
Step H 64.8544 5188.35 11241.43 134897.15
Step I 66.8001 5344.01 11578.68 138944.21
Step J 68.8041 5504.33 11926.04 143112.53
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1310B Electric Business Analyst I-B Step A 47.5953 3807.62 8249.85 98998.22 Step B 50.3503 4028.02 8727.39 104728.62
Step C 51.8608 4148.86 8989.21 107870.46
Step D 53.4167 4273.34 9258.89 111106.74
Step E 55.0192 4401.54 9536.66 114439.94
Step F 56.6698 4533.58 9822.77 117873.18
Step G 58.3698 4669.58 10117.43 121409.18
Step H 60.1209 4809.67 10420.96 125051.47
Step I 61.9245 4953.96 10733.58 128802.96
Step J 63.7823 5102.58 11055.60 132667.18
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1312B Electric Business Analyst II-B Step A 52.3545 4188.36 9074.78 108897.36 Step B 55.3849 4430.79 9600.05 115200.59
Step C 57.0465 4563.72 9888.06 118656.72
Step D 58.7579 4700.63 10184.70 122216.43
Step E 60.5206 4841.65 10490.24 125882.85
Step F 62.3363 4986.90 10804.96 129659.50
Step G 64.2063 5136.50 11129.09 133549.10
Step H 66.1325 5290.60 11462.97 137555.60
Step I 68.1165 5449.32 11806.86 141682.32
Step J 70.1600 5612.80 12161.07 145932.80
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1066B Electric Compliance Analyst I-B Step A 47.5950 3807.60 8249.80 98997.60 Step B 50.3500 4028.00 8727.33 104728.00
Step C 51.8605 4148.84 8989.15 107869.84
Step D 53.4163 4273.30 9258.83 111105.90
Step E 55.0188 4401.50 9536.59 114439.10
Step F 56.6694 4533.55 9822.70 117872.35
Step G 58.3694 4669.55 10117.36 121408.35
Step H 60.1206 4809.65 10420.90 125050.85
Step I 61.9242 4953.94 10733.53 128802.34
Step J 63.7819 5102.55 11055.53 132666.35
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2335B Electric Compliance Analyst II-B Step A 52.3553 4188.42 9074.92 108899.02 Step B 55.3859 4430.87 9600.22 115202.67
Step C 57.0474 4563.79 9888.22 118658.59
Step D 58.7589 4700.71 10184.88 122218.51
Step E 60.5216 4841.73 10490.41 125884.93
Step F 62.3373 4986.98 10805.13 129661.58
Step G 64.2074 5136.59 11129.28 133551.39
Step H 66.1336 5290.69 11463.16 137557.89
Step I 68.1176 5449.41 11807.05 141684.61
Step J 70.1612 5612.90 12161.27 145935.30
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6285B Electric Customer Programs
Supervisor-B
Step A 66.2291 5298.33 11479.71 137756.53
Step B 70.0627 5605.02 12144.20 145730.42
Step C 72.1647 5773.18 12508.55 150102.58
Step D 74.3296 5946.37 12883.80 154605.57
Step E 76.5595 6124.76 13270.31 159243.76
Step F 78.8563 6308.50 13668.43 164021.10
Step G 81.2220 6497.76 14078.48 168941.76
Step H 83.6586 6692.69 14500.82 174009.89
Step I 86.1683 6893.46 14935.84 179230.06
Step J 88.7534 7100.27 15383.92 184607.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1117B Electric Economic and Development
Partnership Manager-B
Step A 72.8521 5828.17 12627.70 151532.37
Step B 77.0690 6165.52 13358.63 160303.52
Step C 79.3811 6350.49 13759.39 165112.69
Step D 81.7625 6541.00 14172.17 170066.00
Step E 84.2154 6737.23 14597.34 175168.03
Step F 86.7419 6939.35 15035.26 180423.15
Step G 89.3441 7147.53 15486.31 185835.73
Step H 92.0245 7361.96 15950.91 191410.96
Step I 94.7852 7582.82 16429.43 197153.22
Step J 97.6287 7810.30 16922.31 203067.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2284B Electric Engineering Technician
Supervisor-B
Step A 58.8774 4710.19 10205.42 122464.99
Step B 62.2853 4982.82 10796.12 129553.42
Step C 64.1539 5132.31 11120.01 133440.11
Step D 66.0785 5286.28 11453.61 137443.28
Step E 68.0609 5444.87 11797.22 141566.67
Step F 70.1026 5608.21 12151.12 145813.41
Step G 72.2058 5776.46 12515.67 150188.06
Step H 74.3720 5949.76 12891.15 154693.76
Step I 76.6031 6128.25 13277.87 159334.45
Step J 78.9012 6312.10 13676.21 164114.50
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2338B Electric Operations Manager-B Step A 88.8925 7111.40 15408.03 184896.40 Step B 94.0380 7523.04 16299.92 195599.04
Step C 96.8591 7748.73 16788.91 201466.93
Step D 99.7649 7981.19 17292.58 207510.99
Step E 102.7578 8220.62 17811.35 213736.22
Step F 105.8405 8467.24 18345.69 220148.24
Step G 109.0157 8721.26 18896.05 226752.66
Step H 112.2862 8982.90 19462.94 233555.30
Step I 115.6548 9252.38 20046.83 240561.98
Step J 119.1244 9529.95 20648.23 247778.75
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2339B Electric Operations Supervisor-B Step A 80.8150 6465.20 14007.93 168095.20 Step B 85.4929 6839.43 14818.77 177825.23
Step C 88.0576 7044.61 15263.32 183159.81
Step D 90.6994 7255.95 15721.23 188654.75
Step E 93.4204 7473.63 16192.87 194314.43
Step F 96.2230 7697.84 16678.65 200143.84
Step G 99.1097 7928.78 17179.01 206148.18
Step H 102.0830 8166.64 17694.39 212332.64
Step I 105.1455 8411.64 18225.22 218702.64
Step J 108.2998 8663.98 18771.97 225263.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2314B Electric Resources Planner I-B Step A 54.9699 4397.59 9528.12 114337.39 Step B 58.1518 4652.14 10079.65 120955.74
Step C 59.8964 4791.71 10382.04 124584.51
Step D 61.6932 4935.46 10693.49 128321.86
Step E 63.5441 5083.53 11014.31 132171.73
Step F 65.4504 5236.03 11344.74 136136.83
Step G 67.4139 5393.11 11685.08 140220.91
Step H 69.4364 5554.91 12035.64 144427.71
Step I 71.5194 5721.55 12396.70 148760.35
Step J 73.6650 5893.20 12768.60 153223.20
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2316B Electric Resources Planner II-B Step A 60.4668 4837.34 10480.91 125770.94 Step B 63.9670 5117.36 11087.61 133051.36
Step C 65.8860 5270.88 11420.24 137042.88
Step D 67.8626 5429.01 11762.85 141154.21
Step E 69.8985 5591.88 12115.74 145388.88
Step F 71.9954 5759.63 12479.20 149750.43
Step G 74.1553 5932.42 12853.59 154243.02
Step H 76.3800 6110.40 13239.20 158870.40
Step I 78.6713 6293.70 13636.36 163636.30
Step J 81.0315 6482.52 14045.46 168545.52
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2216B Electric Risk and Compliance
Supervisor-B
Step A 66.2254 5298.03 11479.07 137748.83
Step B 70.0588 5604.70 12143.53 145722.30
Step C 72.1605 5772.84 12507.82 150093.84
Step D 74.3253 5946.02 12883.05 154596.62
Step E 76.5551 6124.41 13269.55 159234.61
Step F 78.8518 6308.14 13667.65 164011.74
Step G 81.2173 6497.38 14077.67 168931.98
Step H 83.6538 6692.30 14499.99 173999.90
Step I 86.1634 6893.07 14934.99 179219.87
Step J 88.7483 7099.86 15383.04 184596.46
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2352B Electric Safety Coordinator-B Step A 40.9244 3273.95 7093.56 85122.75 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2319B Electric Substation Supervisor-B Step A 80.8150 6465.20 14007.93 168095.20 Step B 85.4929 6839.43 14818.77 177825.23
Step C 88.0576 7044.61 15263.32 183159.81
Step D 90.6994 7255.95 15721.23 188654.75
Step E 93.4204 7473.63 16192.87 194314.43
Step F 96.2230 7697.84 16678.65 200143.84
Step G 99.1097 7928.78 17179.01 206148.18
Step H 102.0830 8166.64 17694.39 212332.64
Step I 105.1455 8411.64 18225.22 218702.64
Step J 108.2998 8663.98 18771.97 225263.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9560B Electric Technology Systems
Administrator-B
Step A 66.2292 5298.34 11479.73 137756.74
Step B 70.0627 5605.02 12144.20 145730.42
Step C 72.1647 5773.18 12508.55 150102.58
Step D 74.3296 5946.37 12883.80 154605.57
Step E 76.5595 6124.76 13270.31 159243.76
Step F 78.8563 6308.50 13668.43 164021.10
Step G 81.2220 6497.76 14078.48 168941.76
Step H 83.6586 6692.69 14500.82 174009.89
Step I 86.1683 6893.46 14935.84 179230.06
Step J 88.7534 7100.27 15383.92 184607.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1116B Electric Utility Chief Operating
Officer-B
Step A 112.4492 8995.94 19491.19 233894.34
Step B 118.9582 9516.66 20619.42 247433.06
Step C 122.5270 9802.16 21238.01 254856.16
Step D 126.2028 10096.22 21875.15 262501.82
Step E 129.9889 10399.11 22531.41 270376.91
Step F 133.8885 10711.08 23207.34 278488.08
Step G 137.9052 11032.42 23903.57 286842.82
Step H 142.0424 11363.39 24620.68 295448.19
Step I 146.3036 11704.29 25359.29 304311.49
Step J 150.6927 12055.42 26120.07 313440.82
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2320B Electric Utility Director-B Step A 127.7846 10222.77 22149.33 265791.97 Step B 135.1814 10814.51 23431.44 281177.31
Step C 139.2369 11138.95 24134.40 289612.75
Step D 143.4140 11473.12 24858.43 298301.12
Step E 147.7163 11817.30 25604.16 307249.90
Step F 152.1479 12171.83 26372.30 316467.63
Step G 156.7122 12536.98 27163.45 325961.38
Step H 161.4136 12913.09 27978.36 335740.29
Step I 166.2560 13300.48 28817.71 345812.48
Step J 171.2437 13699.50 29682.24 356186.90
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2215B Electric Utility Financial AdministratorB Step A 66.2287 5298.30 11479.64 137755.70 Step B 70.0623 5604.98 12144.13 145729.58
Step C 72.1643 5773.14 12508.48 150101.74
Step D 74.3291 5946.33 12883.71 154604.53
Step E 76.5591 6124.73 13270.24 159242.93
Step F 78.8558 6308.46 13668.34 164020.06
Step G 81.2215 6497.72 14078.39 168940.72
Step H 83.6581 6692.65 14500.74 174008.85
Step I 86.1678 6893.42 14935.75 179229.02
Step J 88.7529 7100.23 15383.84 184606.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2378B Electronic Maintenance CoordinatorB Step A 43.4760 3478.08 7535.84 90430.08 Step B 45.9916 3679.33 7971.88 95662.53
Step C 47.3714 3789.71 8211.04 98532.51
Step D 48.7925 3903.40 8457.37 101488.40
Step E 50.2562 4020.50 8711.07 104532.90
Step F 51.7639 4141.11 8972.41 107668.91
Step G 53.3169 4265.35 9241.60 110899.15
Step H 54.9164 4393.31 9518.84 114226.11
Step I 56.5639 4525.11 9804.41 117652.91
Step J 58.2618 4660.94 10098.71 121184.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2500B Energy Services Account
Representative I-B
Step A 46.8489 3747.91 8120.48 97445.71
Step B 49.5607 3964.86 8590.52 103086.26
Step C 51.0475 4083.80 8848.23 106178.80
Step D 52.5789 4206.31 9113.68 109364.11
Step E 54.1563 4332.50 9387.09 112645.10
Step F 55.7810 4462.48 9668.71 116024.48
Step G 57.4544 4596.35 9958.76 119505.15
Step H 59.1781 4734.25 10257.54 123090.45
Step I 60.9534 4876.27 10565.26 126783.07
Step J 62.7820 5022.56 10882.21 130586.56
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2501B Energy Services Account
Representative II-B
Step A 51.5339 4122.71 8932.54 107190.51
Step B 54.5169 4361.35 9449.60 113395.15
Step C 56.1524 4492.19 9733.08 116796.99
Step D 57.8370 4626.96 10025.08 120300.96
Step E 59.5721 4765.77 10325.83 123909.97
Step F 61.3593 4908.74 10635.61 127627.34
Step G 63.2000 5056.00 10954.67 131456.00
Step H 65.0961 5207.69 11283.32 135399.89
Step I 67.0489 5363.91 11621.81 139461.71
Step J 69.0604 5524.83 11970.47 143645.63
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1277B Engineering Manager-B Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 68.2806 5462.45 11835.30 142023.65
Step C 70.3291 5626.33 12190.38 146284.53
Step D 72.4390 5795.12 12556.09 150673.12
Step E 74.6122 5968.98 12932.78 155193.38
Step F 76.8506 6148.05 13320.77 159849.25
Step G 79.1560 6332.48 13720.37 164644.48
Step H 81.5308 6522.46 14132.01 169584.06
Step I 83.9766 6718.13 14555.94 174671.33
Step J 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2540B Environmental Coordinator-B Step A 47.0632 3765.06 8157.62 97891.46 Step B 49.7874 3982.99 8629.82 103557.79
Step C 51.2811 4102.49 8888.72 106664.69
Step D 52.8195 4225.56 9155.38 109864.56
Step E 54.4041 4352.33 9430.04 113160.53
Step F 56.0362 4482.90 9712.94 116555.30
Step G 57.7172 4617.38 10004.31 120051.78
Step H 59.4488 4755.90 10304.46 123653.50
Step I 61.2322 4898.58 10613.58 127362.98
Step J 63.0692 5045.54 10931.99 131183.94
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2546B Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst I-B
Step A 39.0623 3124.98 6770.80 81249.58
Step B 41.3233 3305.86 7162.71 85952.46
Step C 42.5630 3405.04 7377.59 88531.04
Step D 43.8399 3507.19 7598.92 91186.99
Step E 45.1551 3612.41 7826.88 93922.61
Step F 46.5098 3720.78 8061.70 96740.38
Step G 47.9051 3832.41 8303.55 99642.61
Step H 49.3423 3947.38 8552.67 102631.98
Step I 50.8225 4065.80 8809.23 105710.80
Step J 52.3472 4187.78 9073.51 108882.18
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2547B Environmental Utilities Business
Analyst II-B
Step A 42.9694 3437.55 7448.03 89376.35
Step B 45.4568 3636.54 7879.18 94550.14
Step C 46.8204 3745.63 8115.54 97386.43
Step D 48.2250 3858.00 8359.00 100308.00
Step E 49.6718 3973.74 8609.78 103317.34
Step F 51.1620 4092.96 8868.08 106416.96
Step G 52.6968 4215.74 9134.11 109609.34
Step H 54.2777 4342.22 9408.13 112897.62
Step I 55.9060 4472.48 9690.37 116284.48
Step J 57.5832 4606.66 9981.09 119773.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1122B Environmental Utilities Business
Services Manager-B
Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18
Step B 61.1956 4895.65 10607.24 127286.85
Step C 63.0315 5042.52 10925.46 131105.52
Step D 64.9224 5193.79 11253.22 135038.59
Step E 66.8701 5349.61 11590.82 139089.81
Step F 68.8762 5510.10 11938.54 143262.50
Step G 70.9426 5675.41 12296.72 147560.61
Step H 73.0708 5845.66 12665.61 151987.26
Step I 75.2630 6021.04 13045.59 156547.04
Step J 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1684B Environmental Utilities Director-B Step A 92.7804 7422.43 16081.94 192983.23 Step B 98.1508 7852.06 17012.81 204153.66
Step C 101.0954 8087.63 17523.20 210278.43
Step D 104.1282 8330.26 18048.89 216586.66
Step E 107.2520 8580.16 18590.35 223084.16
Step F 110.4696 8837.57 19148.06 229776.77
Step G 113.7837 9102.70 19722.51 236670.10
Step H 117.1972 9375.78 20314.18 243770.18
Step I 120.7132 9657.06 20923.62 251083.46
Step J 124.3345 9946.76 21551.31 258615.76
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1024B Environmental Utilities Maintenance
Superintendent-B
Step A 54.9951 4399.61 9532.48 114389.81
Step B 58.1790 4654.32 10084.36 121012.32
Step C 59.9244 4793.95 10386.90 124642.75
Step D 61.7221 4937.77 10698.50 128381.97
Step E 63.5738 5085.90 11019.46 132233.50
Step F 65.4810 5238.48 11350.04 136200.48
Step G 67.4455 5395.64 11690.55 140286.64
Step H 69.4688 5557.50 12041.26 144495.10
Step I 71.5529 5724.23 12402.50 148830.03
Step J 73.6995 5895.96 12774.58 153294.96
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2541B Environmental Utility Compliance
Administrator-B
Step A 48.2377 3859.02 8361.20 100334.42
Step B 51.0296 4082.37 8845.13 106141.57
Step C 52.5605 4204.84 9110.49 109325.84
Step D 54.1374 4330.99 9383.82 112605.79
Step E 55.7615 4460.92 9665.33 115983.92
Step F 57.4343 4594.74 9955.28 119463.34
Step G 59.1573 4732.58 10253.93 123047.18
Step H 60.9321 4874.57 10561.56 126738.77
Step I 62.7600 5020.80 10878.40 130540.80
Step J 64.6428 5171.42 11204.75 134457.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3395B Facilities Manager-B Step A 52.8428 4227.42 9159.42 109913.02 Step B 55.9016 4472.13 9689.61 116275.33
Step C 57.5787 4606.30 9980.31 119763.70
Step D 59.3060 4744.48 10279.71 123356.48
Step E 61.0852 4886.82 10588.10 127057.22
Step F 62.9178 5033.42 10905.75 130869.02
Step G 64.8053 5184.42 11232.92 134795.02
Step H 66.7495 5339.96 11569.91 138838.96
Step I 68.7519 5500.15 11917.00 143003.95
Step J 70.8145 5665.16 12274.51 147294.16
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4321B Facilities Supervisor-B Step A 39.4813 3158.50 6843.43 82121.10 Step B 41.7666 3341.33 7239.54 86874.53
Step C 43.0196 3441.57 7456.73 89480.77
Step D 44.3102 3544.82 7680.43 92165.22
Step E 45.6395 3651.16 7910.85 94930.16
Step F 47.0088 3760.70 8148.19 97778.30
Step G 48.4189 3873.51 8392.61 100711.31
Step H 49.8715 3989.72 8644.39 103732.72
Step I 51.3676 4109.41 8903.72 106844.61
Step J 52.9087 4232.70 9170.84 110050.10
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2900B Finance Manager-B Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 61.1956 4895.65 10607.24 127286.85
Step C 63.0315 5042.52 10925.46 131105.52
Step D 64.9224 5193.79 11253.22 135038.59
Step E 66.8701 5349.61 11590.82 139089.81
Step F 68.8762 5510.10 11938.54 143262.50
Step G 70.9426 5675.41 12296.72 147560.61
Step H 73.0708 5845.66 12665.61 151987.26
Step I 75.2630 6021.04 13045.59 156547.04
Step J 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905ZB Fire Battalion Chief 8Hr-ZB Step A 57.3325 4586.60 9937.63 119251.60 Step B 60.6472 4851.78 10512.18 126146.18
Step C 62.4666 4997.33 10827.54 129930.53
Step D 64.3406 5147.25 11152.37 133828.45
Step E 66.2708 5301.66 11486.94 137843.26
Step F 68.2589 5460.71 11831.54 141978.51
Step G 70.3067 5624.54 12186.49 146237.94
Step H 72.4159 5793.27 12552.09 150625.07
Step I 74.5883 5967.06 12928.64 155143.66
Step J 76.8308 6146.46 13317.34 159808.06
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0905B Fire Battalion Chief-B Step A 40.9517 4586.59 9937.61 119251.35 Step B 43.3194 4851.77 10512.17 126146.09
Step C 44.6191 4997.34 10827.57 129930.82
Step D 45.9576 5147.25 11152.38 133828.53
Step E 47.3364 5301.68 11486.97 137843.60
Step F 48.7565 5460.73 11831.58 141978.93
Step G 50.2191 5624.54 12186.50 146238.02
Step H 51.7257 5793.28 12552.10 150625.24
Step I 53.2774 5967.07 12928.65 155143.79
Step J 54.8793 6146.48 13317.38 159808.52
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3330B Fire Chief-B Step A 84.6369 6770.95 14670.40 176044.75 Step B 89.5358 7162.86 15519.54 186234.46
Step C 92.2220 7377.76 15985.15 191821.76
Step D 94.9886 7599.09 16464.69 197576.29
Step E 97.8383 7827.06 16958.64 203503.66
Step F 100.7734 8061.87 17467.39 209608.67
Step G 103.7966 8303.73 17991.41 215896.93
Step H 106.9105 8552.84 18531.15 222373.84
Step I 110.1178 8809.42 19087.09 229045.02
Step J 113.4214 9073.71 19659.71 235916.51
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332B Fire Division Chief-B Step A 63.0620 5044.96 10930.75 131168.96 Step B 66.7122 5336.98 11563.45 138761.38
Step C 68.7136 5497.09 11910.36 142924.29
Step D 70.7750 5662.00 12267.67 147212.00
Step E 72.8982 5831.86 12635.69 151628.26
Step F 75.0852 6006.82 13014.77 156177.22
Step G 77.3378 6187.02 13405.22 160862.62
Step H 79.6579 6372.63 13807.37 165688.43
Step I 82.0476 6563.81 14221.58 170659.01
Step J 84.5091 6760.73 14648.24 175778.93
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3332ZB Fire Divison Chief 24Hr-ZB Step A 45.0443 5044.96 10930.75 131169.00 Step B 47.6515 5336.97 11563.43 138761.17
Step C 49.0810 5497.07 11910.32 142923.87
Step D 50.5535 5661.99 12267.65 147211.79
Step E 52.0701 5831.85 12635.68 151628.13
Step F 53.6322 6006.81 13014.75 156176.97
Step G 55.2411 6187.00 13405.17 160862.08
Step H 56.8983 6372.61 13807.32 165687.85
Step I 58.6053 6563.79 14221.55 170658.63
Step J 60.3635 6760.71 14648.21 175778.51
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3392B Fleet Manager-B Step A 48.7262 3898.10 8445.87 101350.50 Step B 51.5466 4123.73 8934.74 107216.93
Step C 53.0930 4247.44 9202.79 110433.44
Step D 54.6858 4374.86 9478.87 113746.46
Step E 56.3264 4506.11 9763.24 117158.91
Step F 58.0162 4641.30 10056.14 120673.70
Step G 59.7566 4780.53 10357.81 124293.73
Step H 61.5493 4923.94 10668.55 128022.54
Step I 63.3958 5071.66 10988.61 131863.26
Step J 65.2977 5223.82 11318.27 135819.22
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 2565B Fleet Services Supervisor-B Step A 39.1872 3134.98 6792.45 81509.38 Step B 41.4555 3316.44 7185.62 86227.44
Step C 42.6992 3415.94 7401.19 88814.34
Step D 43.9802 3518.42 7623.23 91478.82
Step E 45.2995 3623.96 7851.91 94222.96
Step F 46.6585 3732.68 8087.47 97049.68
Step G 48.0583 3844.66 8330.11 99961.26
Step H 49.5000 3960.00 8580.00 102960.00
Step I 50.9850 4078.80 8837.40 106048.80
Step J 52.5146 4201.17 9102.53 109230.37
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3451B Government Relations AdministratorB Step A 56.4732 4517.86 9788.69 117464.26 Step B 59.7420 4779.36 10355.28 124263.36
Step C 61.5342 4922.74 10665.93 127991.14
Step D 63.3803 5070.42 10985.92 131831.02
Step E 65.2817 5222.54 11315.49 135785.94
Step F 67.2402 5379.22 11654.97 139859.62
Step G 69.2573 5540.58 12004.60 144055.18
Step H 71.3351 5706.81 12364.75 148377.01
Step I 73.4751 5878.01 12735.68 152828.21
Step J 75.6794 6054.35 13117.76 157413.15
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1647B Government Relations
Representative I-B
Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11
Step B 39.3574 3148.59 6821.95 81863.39
Step C 40.5382 3243.06 7026.62 84319.46
Step D 41.7543 3340.34 7237.41 86848.94
Step E 43.0069 3440.55 7454.53 89454.35
Step F 44.2971 3543.77 7678.16 92137.97
Step G 45.6261 3650.09 7908.52 94902.29
Step H 46.9948 3759.58 8145.77 97749.18
Step I 48.4047 3872.38 8390.15 100681.78
Step J 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1648B Government Relations
Representative II-B
Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96
Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3589B Housing Manager-B Step A 51.3387 4107.10 8898.71 106784.50 Step B 54.3125 4345.00 9414.17 112970.00
Step C 55.9418 4475.34 9696.58 116358.94
Step D 57.6201 4609.61 9987.48 119849.81
Step E 59.3487 4747.90 10287.11 123445.30
Step F 61.1291 4890.33 10595.71 127148.53
Step G 62.9630 5037.04 10913.59 130963.04
Step H 64.8518 5188.14 11240.98 134891.74
Step I 66.7975 5343.80 11578.23 138938.80
Step J 68.8013 5504.10 11925.56 143106.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3590B Housing Supervisor-B Step A 42.7824 3422.59 7415.62 88987.39 Step B 45.2587 3620.70 7844.84 94138.10
Step C 46.6165 3729.32 8080.19 96962.32
Step D 48.0150 3841.20 8322.60 99871.20
Step E 49.4554 3956.43 8572.27 102867.23
Step F 50.9391 4075.13 8829.44 105953.33
Step G 52.4673 4197.38 9094.33 109131.98
Step H 54.0413 4323.30 9367.16 112405.90
Step I 55.6625 4453.00 9648.17 115778.00
Step J 57.3324 4586.59 9937.62 119251.39
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3594B Human Resources Analyst I-B Step A 37.5613 3004.90 6510.63 78127.50 Step B 39.7356 3178.85 6887.50 82650.05
Step C 40.9275 3274.20 7094.10 85129.20
Step D 42.1554 3372.43 7306.94 87683.23
Step E 43.4201 3473.61 7526.15 90313.81
Step F 44.7227 3577.82 7751.93 93023.22
Step G 46.0644 3685.15 7984.50 95813.95
Step H 47.4463 3795.70 8224.03 98688.30
Step I 48.8697 3909.58 8470.75 101648.98
Step J 50.3357 4026.86 8724.85 104698.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3596B Human Resources Analyst II-B Step A 41.3174 3305.39 7161.68 85940.19 Step B 43.7090 3496.72 7576.23 90914.72
Step C 45.0202 3601.62 7803.50 93642.02
Step D 46.3709 3709.67 8037.62 96451.47
Step E 47.7621 3820.97 8278.76 99345.17
Step F 49.1948 3935.58 8527.10 102325.18
Step G 50.6707 4053.66 8782.92 105395.06
Step H 52.1909 4175.27 9046.42 108557.07
Step I 53.7566 4300.53 9317.81 111813.73
Step J 55.3693 4429.54 9597.35 115168.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3598B Human Resources Director-B Step A 74.0282 5922.26 12831.55 153978.66 Step B 78.3133 6265.06 13574.31 162891.66
Step C 80.6627 6453.02 13981.53 167778.42
Step D 83.0825 6646.60 14400.97 172811.60
Step E 85.5750 6846.00 14833.00 177996.00
Step F 88.1423 7051.38 15278.00 183335.98
Step G 90.7865 7262.92 15736.33 188835.92
Step H 93.5101 7480.81 16208.42 194501.01
Step I 96.3154 7705.23 16694.67 200336.03
Step J 99.2049 7936.39 17195.52 206346.19
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3599B Human Resources Manager-B Step A 52.2708 4181.66 9060.27 108723.26 Step B 55.2968 4423.74 9584.78 115017.34
Step C 56.9557 4556.46 9872.32 118467.86
Step D 58.6643 4693.14 10168.48 122021.74
Step E 60.4243 4833.94 10473.55 125682.54
Step F 62.2370 4978.96 10787.75 129452.96
Step G 64.1041 5128.33 11111.38 133336.53
Step H 66.0272 5282.18 11444.71 137336.58
Step I 68.0080 5440.64 11788.05 141456.64
Step J 70.0483 5603.86 12141.71 145700.46
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1002B Hydrogeologist-B Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.6922 4855.38 10519.98 126239.78
Step C 62.5129 5001.03 10835.57 130026.83
Step D 64.3884 5151.07 11160.66 133927.87
Step E 66.3200 5305.60 11495.47 137945.60
Step F 68.3096 5464.77 11840.33 142083.97
Step G 70.3589 5628.71 12195.54 146346.51
Step H 72.4696 5797.57 12561.40 150736.77
Step I 74.6437 5971.50 12938.24 155258.90
Step J 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3625B Information Security Administrator-B Step A 51.4209 4113.67 8912.96 106955.47 Step B 54.3974 4351.79 9428.88 113146.59
Step C 56.0292 4482.34 9711.73 116540.74
Step D 57.7102 4616.82 10003.10 120037.22
Step E 59.4415 4755.32 10303.19 123638.32
Step F 61.2246 4897.97 10612.26 127347.17
Step G 63.0614 5044.91 10930.64 131167.71
Step H 64.9533 5196.26 11258.57 135102.86
Step I 66.9019 5352.15 11596.33 139155.95
Step J 68.9090 5512.72 11944.23 143330.72
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9542B Information Technology Client
Services Supervisor-B
Step A 46.8423 3747.38 8119.33 97431.98
Step B 49.5537 3964.30 8589.31 103071.70
Step C 51.0404 4083.23 8847.00 106164.03
Step D 52.5715 4205.72 9112.39 109348.72
Step E 54.1487 4331.90 9385.77 112629.30
Step F 55.7732 4461.86 9667.35 116008.26
Step G 57.4463 4595.70 9957.36 119488.30
Step H 59.1698 4733.58 10256.10 123073.18
Step I 60.9449 4875.59 10563.78 126765.39
Step J 62.7732 5021.86 10880.69 130568.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3602B Information Technology Program
Manager-B
Step A 51.3060 4104.48 8893.04 106716.48
Step B 54.2756 4342.05 9407.77 112893.25
Step C 55.9039 4472.31 9690.01 116280.11
Step D 57.5809 4606.47 9980.69 119768.27
Step E 59.3084 4744.67 10280.12 123361.47
Step F 61.0877 4887.02 10588.53 127062.42
Step G 62.9203 5033.62 10906.19 130874.22
Step H 64.8079 5184.63 11233.37 134800.43
Step I 66.7521 5340.17 11570.36 138844.37
Step J 68.7547 5500.38 11917.48 143009.78
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 3810B Key Accounts Representative-B Step A 56.6845 4534.76 9825.31 117903.76 Step B 59.9657 4797.26 10394.05 124728.66
Step C 61.7647 4941.18 10705.88 128470.58
Step D 63.6176 5089.41 11027.05 132324.61
Step E 65.5262 5242.10 11357.87 136294.50
Step F 67.4920 5399.36 11698.61 140383.36
Step G 69.5167 5561.34 12049.56 144594.74
Step H 71.6022 5728.18 12411.05 148932.58
Step I 73.7503 5900.02 12783.39 153400.62
Step J 75.9628 6077.02 13166.89 158002.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 4449B Management Analyst - City Manager
Office-B
Step A 42.9706 3437.65 7448.24 89378.85
Step B 45.4577 3636.62 7879.33 94552.02
Step C 46.8214 3745.71 8115.71 97388.51
Step D 48.2261 3858.09 8359.19 100310.29
Step E 49.6729 3973.83 8609.97 103319.63
Step F 51.1630 4093.04 8868.25 106419.04
Step G 52.6979 4215.83 9134.30 109611.63
Step H 54.2789 4342.31 9408.34 112900.11
Step I 55.9073 4472.58 9690.60 116287.18
Step J 57.5845 4606.76 9981.31 119775.76
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0045B Management Analyst I-B Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.3574 3148.59 6821.95 81863.39
Step C 40.5382 3243.06 7026.62 84319.46
Step D 41.7543 3340.34 7237.41 86848.94
Step E 43.0069 3440.55 7454.53 89454.35
Step F 44.2971 3543.77 7678.16 92137.97
Step G 45.6261 3650.09 7908.52 94902.29
Step H 46.9948 3759.58 8145.77 97749.18
Step I 48.4047 3872.38 8390.15 100681.78
Step J 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0050B Management Analyst II-B Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5020B Park Development Project Manager IB Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.3574 3148.59 6821.95 81863.39
Step C 40.5382 3243.06 7026.62 84319.46
Step D 41.7543 3340.34 7237.41 86848.94
Step E 43.0069 3440.55 7454.53 89454.35
Step F 44.2971 3543.77 7678.16 92137.97
Step G 45.6261 3650.09 7908.52 94902.29
Step H 46.9948 3759.58 8145.77 97749.18
Step I 48.4047 3872.38 8390.15 100681.78
Step J 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5022B Park Development Project Manager
II-B
Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96
Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1106B Park Planning and Development
Manager-B
Step A 51.7657 4141.26 8972.72 107672.66
Step B 54.7627 4381.02 9492.20 113906.42
Step C 56.4057 4512.46 9776.99 117323.86
Step D 58.0978 4647.82 10070.29 120843.42
Step E 59.8407 4787.26 10372.39 124468.66
Step F 61.6360 4930.88 10683.57 128202.88
Step G 63.4850 5078.80 11004.07 132048.80
Step H 65.3896 5231.17 11334.20 136010.37
Step I 67.3513 5388.10 11674.23 140090.70
Step J 69.3718 5549.74 12024.45 144293.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5082B Parks Recreation and Libraries
Director-B
Step A 77.7301 6218.41 13473.22 161678.61
Step B 82.2294 6578.35 14253.10 171037.15
Step C 84.6962 6775.70 14680.67 176168.10
Step D 87.2371 6978.97 15121.10 181453.17
Step E 89.8542 7188.34 15574.73 186896.74
Step F 92.5499 7403.99 16041.98 192503.79
Step G 95.3264 7626.11 16523.24 198278.91
Step H 98.1862 7854.90 17018.94 204227.30
Step I 101.1317 8090.54 17529.49 210353.94
Step J 104.1657 8333.26 18055.39 216664.66
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9547B Parks Recreation and Libraries
Manager-B
Step A 51.7657 4141.26 8972.72 107672.66
Step B 54.7627 4381.02 9492.20 113906.42
Step C 56.4057 4512.46 9776.99 117323.86
Step D 58.0978 4647.82 10070.29 120843.42
Step E 59.8407 4787.26 10372.39 124468.66
Step F 61.6360 4930.88 10683.57 128202.88
Step G 63.4850 5078.80 11004.07 132048.80
Step H 65.3896 5231.17 11334.20 136010.37
Step I 67.3513 5388.10 11674.23 140090.70
Step J 69.3718 5549.74 12024.45 144293.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9546B Parks Recreation and Libraries
Superintendent-B
Step A 45.0143 3601.14 7802.48 93629.74
Step B 47.6198 3809.58 8254.10 99049.18
Step C 49.0484 3923.87 8501.72 102020.67
Step D 50.5198 4041.58 8756.77 105081.18
Step E 52.0354 4162.83 9019.47 108233.63
Step F 53.5965 4287.72 9290.06 111480.72
Step G 55.2044 4416.35 9568.76 114825.15
Step H 56.8605 4548.84 9855.82 118269.84
Step I 58.5664 4685.31 10151.51 121818.11
Step J 60.3233 4825.86 10456.04 125472.46
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5069B Parks Supervisor-B Step A 35.3021 2824.17 6119.03 73428.37 Step B 37.3459 2987.67 6473.29 77679.47
Step C 38.4663 3077.30 6667.49 80009.90
Step D 39.6202 3169.62 6867.50 82410.02
Step E 40.8089 3264.71 7073.54 84882.51
Step F 42.0331 3362.65 7285.74 87428.85
Step G 43.2941 3463.53 7504.31 90051.73
Step H 44.5929 3567.43 7729.44 92753.23
Step I 45.9307 3674.46 7961.32 95535.86
Step J 47.3086 3784.69 8200.16 98401.89
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1124B Payroll Analyst I-B Step A 37.2039 2976.31 6448.68 77384.11 Step B 39.3574 3148.59 6821.95 81863.39
Step C 40.5382 3243.06 7026.62 84319.46
Step D 41.7543 3340.34 7237.41 86848.94
Step E 43.0069 3440.55 7454.53 89454.35
Step F 44.2971 3543.77 7678.16 92137.97
Step G 45.6261 3650.09 7908.52 94902.29
Step H 46.9948 3759.58 8145.77 97749.18
Step I 48.4047 3872.38 8390.15 100681.78
Step J 49.8568 3988.54 8641.85 103702.14
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1125B Payroll Analyst II-B Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9428B Payroll Supervisor-B Step A 47.0629 3765.03 8157.57 97890.83 Step B 49.7871 3982.97 8629.76 103557.17
Step C 51.2807 4102.46 8888.65 106663.86
Step D 52.8192 4225.54 9155.33 109863.94
Step E 54.4037 4352.30 9429.97 113159.70
Step F 56.0359 4482.87 9712.89 116554.67
Step G 57.7169 4617.35 10004.26 120051.15
Step H 59.4484 4755.87 10304.39 123652.67
Step I 61.2319 4898.55 10613.53 127362.35
Step J 63.0689 5045.51 10931.94 131183.31
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1501B Permits Supervisor-B Step A 40.9245 3273.96 7093.58 85122.96 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5309B Planning Manager-B Step A 63.8914 5111.31 11074.51 132894.11 Step B 67.5897 5407.18 11715.55 140586.58
Step C 69.6173 5569.38 12067.00 144803.98
Step D 71.7058 5736.46 12429.01 149148.06
Step E 73.8570 5908.56 12801.88 153622.56
Step F 76.0727 6085.82 13185.93 158231.22
Step G 78.3550 6268.40 13581.53 162978.40
Step H 80.7056 6456.45 13988.97 167867.65
Step I 83.1267 6650.14 14408.63 172903.54
Step J 85.6205 6849.64 14840.89 178090.64
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5400B Police Captain-B Step A 70.4811 5638.49 12216.72 146600.69 Step B 74.5607 5964.86 12923.85 155086.26
Step C 76.7976 6143.81 13311.58 159739.01
Step D 79.1015 6328.12 13710.93 164531.12
Step E 81.4746 6517.97 14122.26 169467.17
Step F 83.9188 6713.50 14545.93 174551.10
Step G 86.4364 6914.91 14982.31 179787.71
Step H 89.0294 7122.35 15431.76 185181.15
Step I 91.7003 7336.02 15894.72 190736.62
Step J 94.4513 7556.10 16371.56 196458.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5410B Police Chief-B Step A 91.0614 7284.91 15783.98 189407.71 Step B 96.3325 7706.60 16697.63 200371.60
Step C 99.2225 7937.80 17198.57 206382.80
Step D 102.1991 8175.93 17714.51 212574.13
Step E 105.2651 8421.21 18245.95 218951.41
Step F 108.4231 8673.85 18793.34 225520.05
Step G 111.6758 8934.06 19357.14 232285.66
Step H 115.0261 9202.09 19937.86 239254.29
Step I 118.4768 9478.14 20535.98 246431.74
Step J 122.0311 9762.49 21152.06 253824.69
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5420B Police Lieutenant-B Step A 61.2873 4902.98 10623.13 127477.58 Step B 64.8350 5186.80 11238.07 134856.80
Step C 66.7801 5342.41 11575.22 138902.61
Step D 68.7835 5502.68 11922.47 143069.68
Step E 70.8470 5667.76 12280.15 147361.76
Step F 72.9724 5837.79 12648.55 151782.59
Step G 75.1615 6012.92 13027.99 156335.92
Step H 77.4164 6193.31 13418.84 161026.11
Step I 79.7389 6379.11 13821.41 165856.91
Step J 82.1311 6570.49 14236.06 170832.69
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5489B Police Services Administrator-B Step A 53.9435 4315.48 9350.21 112202.48 Step B 57.0659 4565.27 9891.42 118697.07
Step C 58.7779 4702.23 10188.17 122258.03
Step D 60.5413 4843.30 10493.83 125925.90
Step E 62.3575 4988.60 10808.63 129703.60
Step F 64.2283 5138.26 11132.91 133594.86
Step G 66.1551 5292.41 11466.88 137602.61
Step H 68.1398 5451.18 11810.90 141730.78
Step I 70.1840 5614.72 12165.23 145982.72
Step J 72.2895 5783.16 12530.18 150362.16
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1039B Police Social Services Practitioner-B Step A 35.3582 2828.66 6128.75 73545.06 Step B 37.4048 2992.38 6483.50 77801.98
Step C 38.5271 3082.17 6678.03 80136.37
Step D 39.6828 3174.62 6878.35 82540.22
Step E 40.8734 3269.87 7084.72 85016.67
Step F 42.0995 3367.96 7297.25 87566.96
Step G 43.3626 3469.01 7516.18 90194.21
Step H 44.6634 3573.07 7741.66 92899.87
Step I 46.0033 3680.26 7973.91 95686.86
Step J 47.3834 3790.67 8213.12 98557.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1126B Police Social Services Supervisor-B Step A 40.6619 3252.95 7048.06 84576.75 Step B 43.0156 3441.25 7456.04 89472.45
Step C 44.3061 3544.49 7679.72 92156.69
Step D 45.6352 3650.82 7910.10 94921.22
Step E 47.0043 3760.34 8147.41 97768.94
Step F 48.4144 3873.15 8391.83 100701.95
Step G 49.8669 3989.35 8643.60 103723.15
Step H 51.3629 4109.03 8902.90 106834.83
Step I 52.9038 4232.30 9169.99 110039.90
Step J 54.4909 4359.27 9445.09 113341.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5505B Power Engineering Manager-B Step A 81.7450 6539.60 14169.13 170029.60 Step B 86.4768 6918.14 14989.31 179871.74
Step C 89.0710 7125.68 15438.97 185267.68
Step D 91.7431 7339.45 15902.14 190825.65
Step E 94.4954 7559.63 16379.20 196550.43
Step F 97.3303 7786.42 16870.59 202447.02
Step G 100.2502 8020.02 17376.70 208520.42
Step H 103.2578 8260.62 17898.02 214776.22
Step I 106.3555 8508.44 18434.95 221219.44
Step J 109.5461 8763.69 18987.99 227855.89
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5600B Power Generation Superintendent-B Step A 84.3105 6744.84 14613.82 175365.84 Step B 89.1906 7135.25 15459.70 185516.45
Step C 91.8664 7349.31 15923.51 191082.11
Step D 94.6224 7569.79 16401.22 196814.59
Step E 97.4611 7796.89 16893.26 202719.09
Step F 100.3849 8030.79 17400.05 208800.59
Step G 103.3965 8271.72 17922.06 215064.72
Step H 106.4984 8519.87 18459.72 221516.67
Step I 109.6933 8775.46 19013.51 228162.06
Step J 112.9841 9038.73 19583.91 235006.93
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5530B Power Plant Operations and
Maintenance Supervisor-B
Step A 76.7661 6141.29 13306.12 159673.49
Step B 81.2097 6496.78 14076.35 168916.18
Step C 83.6460 6691.68 14498.64 173983.68
Step D 86.1553 6892.42 14933.59 179203.02
Step E 88.7400 7099.20 15381.60 184579.20
Step F 91.4022 7312.18 15843.05 190116.58
Step G 94.1443 7531.54 16318.35 195820.14
Step H 96.9686 7757.49 16807.89 201694.69
Step I 99.8777 7990.22 17312.13 207745.62
Step J 102.8740 8229.92 17831.49 213977.92
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5535B Power Supply and Portfolio
Administrator-B
Step A 81.7413 6539.30 14168.49 170021.90
Step B 86.4729 6917.83 14988.64 179863.63
Step C 89.0670 7125.36 15438.28 185259.36
Step D 91.7390 7339.12 15901.43 190817.12
Step E 94.4912 7559.30 16378.47 196541.70
Step F 97.3260 7786.08 16869.84 202438.08
Step G 100.2457 8019.66 17375.92 208511.06
Step H 103.2531 8260.25 17897.20 214766.45
Step I 106.3507 8508.06 18434.12 221209.46
Step J 109.5412 8763.30 18987.14 227845.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5519B Preventative Maintenance
Supervisor-B
Step A 49.9956 3999.65 8665.90 103990.85
Step B 52.8901 4231.21 9167.62 110011.41
Step C 54.4768 4358.14 9442.65 113311.74
Step D 56.1110 4488.88 9725.91 116710.88
Step E 57.7944 4623.55 10017.70 120212.35
Step F 59.5282 4762.26 10318.22 123818.66
Step G 61.3141 4905.13 10627.78 127533.33
Step H 63.1535 5052.28 10946.61 131359.28
Step I 65.0481 5203.85 11275.00 135300.05
Step J 66.9995 5359.96 11613.25 139358.96
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5514B Principal Engineer-B Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.6922 4855.38 10519.98 126239.78
Step C 62.5129 5001.03 10835.57 130026.83
Step D 64.3884 5151.07 11160.66 133927.87
Step E 66.3200 5305.60 11495.47 137945.60
Step F 68.3096 5464.77 11840.33 142083.97
Step G 70.3589 5628.71 12195.54 146346.51
Step H 72.4696 5797.57 12561.40 150736.77
Step I 74.6437 5971.50 12938.24 155258.90
Step J 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5513B Principal Planner-B Step A 53.2441 4259.53 9228.98 110747.73 Step B 56.3262 4506.10 9763.21 117158.50
Step C 58.0159 4641.27 10056.09 120673.07
Step D 59.7565 4780.52 10357.79 124293.52
Step E 61.5492 4923.94 10668.53 128022.34
Step F 63.3956 5071.65 10988.57 131862.85
Step G 65.2974 5223.79 11318.22 135818.59
Step H 67.2564 5380.51 11657.78 139893.31
Step I 69.2741 5541.93 12007.51 144090.13
Step J 71.3523 5708.18 12367.73 148412.78
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1114B Principal Power Engineer-B Step A 78.1875 6255.00 13552.50 162630.00 Step B 82.7133 6617.06 14336.97 172043.66
Step C 85.1947 6815.58 14767.08 177204.98
Step D 87.7505 7020.04 15210.09 182521.04
Step E 90.3831 7230.65 15666.40 187996.85
Step F 93.0946 7447.57 16136.40 193636.77
Step G 95.8874 7670.99 16620.48 199445.79
Step H 98.7640 7901.12 17119.09 205429.12
Step I 101.7269 8138.15 17632.66 211591.95
Step J 104.7787 8382.30 18161.64 217939.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1115B Principal Power Plant Engineer-B Step A 78.1875 6255.00 13552.50 162630.00 Step B 82.7133 6617.06 14336.97 172043.66
Step C 85.1947 6815.58 14767.08 177204.98
Step D 87.7505 7020.04 15210.09 182521.04
Step E 90.3831 7230.65 15666.40 187996.85
Step F 93.0946 7447.57 16136.40 193636.77
Step G 95.8874 7670.99 16620.48 199445.79
Step H 98.7640 7901.12 17119.09 205429.12
Step I 101.7269 8138.15 17632.66 211591.95
Step J 104.7787 8382.30 18161.64 217939.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1004B Process Engineer-B Step A 57.3714 4589.71 9944.38 119332.51 Step B 60.6922 4855.38 10519.98 126239.78
Step C 62.5129 5001.03 10835.57 130026.83
Step D 64.3884 5151.07 11160.66 133927.87
Step E 66.3200 5305.60 11495.47 137945.60
Step F 68.3096 5464.77 11840.33 142083.97
Step G 70.3589 5628.71 12195.54 146346.51
Step H 72.4696 5797.57 12561.40 150736.77
Step I 74.6437 5971.50 12938.24 155258.90
Step J 76.8831 6150.65 13326.40 159916.85
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1069B Project Supervisor-B Step A 49.8884 3991.07 8647.32 103767.87 Step B 52.7762 4222.10 9147.87 109774.50
Step C 54.3595 4348.76 9422.31 113067.76
Step D 55.9903 4479.22 9704.99 116459.82
Step E 57.6700 4613.60 9996.13 119953.60
Step F 59.4001 4752.01 10296.02 123552.21
Step G 61.1821 4894.57 10604.90 127258.77
Step H 63.0175 5041.40 10923.03 131076.40
Step I 64.9080 5192.64 11250.72 135008.64
Step J 66.8553 5348.42 11588.25 139059.02
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1108B Public Affairs and Communications
Manager-B
Step A 55.8098 4464.78 9673.70 116084.38
Step B 59.0403 4723.22 10233.65 122803.82
Step C 60.8116 4864.93 10540.68 126488.13
Step D 62.6359 5010.87 10856.89 130282.67
Step E 64.5150 5161.20 11182.60 134191.20
Step F 66.4504 5316.03 11518.07 138216.83
Step G 68.4439 5475.51 11863.61 142363.31
Step H 70.4973 5639.78 12219.53 146634.38
Step I 72.6122 5808.98 12586.11 151033.38
Step J 74.7906 5983.25 12963.70 155564.45
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5635B Public Works Director-B Step A 77.7314 6218.51 13473.44 161681.31 Step B 82.2308 6578.46 14253.34 171040.06
Step C 84.6977 6775.82 14680.93 176171.22
Step D 87.2386 6979.09 15121.36 181456.29
Step E 89.8558 7188.46 15575.01 186900.06
Step F 92.5515 7404.12 16042.26 192507.12
Step G 95.3280 7626.24 16523.52 198282.24
Step H 98.1879 7855.03 17019.24 204230.83
Step I 101.1335 8090.68 17529.81 210357.68
Step J 104.1675 8333.40 18055.70 216668.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1087B Public Works Manager-B Step A 54.8772 4390.18 9512.05 114144.58 Step B 58.0538 4644.30 10062.66 120751.90
Step C 59.7955 4783.64 10364.55 124374.64
Step D 61.5893 4927.14 10675.48 128105.74
Step E 63.4370 5074.96 10995.75 131948.96
Step F 65.3401 5227.21 11325.62 135907.41
Step G 67.3003 5384.02 11665.39 139984.62
Step H 69.3194 5545.55 12015.36 144184.35
Step I 71.3988 5711.90 12375.79 148509.50
Step J 73.5409 5883.27 12747.09 152965.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5652B Purchasing and Warehouse
Manager-B
Step A 50.6893 4055.14 8786.15 105433.74
Step B 53.6234 4289.87 9294.72 111536.67
Step C 55.2321 4418.57 9573.56 114882.77
Step D 56.8890 4551.12 9860.76 118329.12
Step E 58.5957 4687.66 10156.59 121879.06
Step F 60.3536 4828.29 10461.29 125535.49
Step G 62.1642 4973.14 10775.13 129301.54
Step H 64.0291 5122.33 11098.38 133180.53
Step I 65.9500 5276.00 11431.33 137176.00
Step J 67.9285 5434.28 11774.27 141291.28
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9544B Recreation and Library Supervisor-B Step A 33.4672 2677.38 5800.98 69611.78 Step B 35.4048 2832.38 6136.83 73641.98
Step C 36.4669 2917.35 6320.93 75851.15
Step D 37.5609 3004.87 6510.56 78126.67
Step E 38.6877 3095.02 6705.87 80470.42
Step F 39.8484 3187.87 6907.06 82884.67
Step G 41.0438 3283.50 7114.26 85371.10
Step H 42.2751 3382.01 7327.68 87932.21
Step I 43.5434 3483.47 7547.52 90570.27
Step J 44.8497 3587.98 7773.95 93287.38
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6231B Refuse Superintendent-B Step A 47.9372 3834.98 8309.11 99709.38 Step B 50.7120 4056.96 8790.08 105480.96
Step C 52.2333 4178.66 9053.77 108645.26
Step D 53.8003 4304.02 9325.39 111904.62
Step E 55.4144 4433.15 9605.16 115261.95
Step F 57.0768 4566.14 9893.31 118719.74
Step G 58.7891 4703.13 10190.11 122281.33
Step H 60.5527 4844.22 10495.80 125949.62
Step I 62.3693 4989.54 10810.68 129728.14
Step J 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6235B Refuse Supervisor-B Step A 39.7944 3183.55 6897.70 82772.35 Step B 42.0972 3367.78 7296.85 87562.18
Step C 43.3601 3468.81 7515.75 90189.01
Step D 44.6609 3572.87 7741.22 92894.67
Step E 46.0007 3680.06 7973.45 95681.46
Step F 47.3807 3790.46 8212.65 98551.86
Step G 48.8022 3904.18 8459.05 101508.58
Step H 50.2663 4021.30 8712.83 104553.90
Step I 51.7743 4141.94 8974.21 107690.54
Step J 53.3275 4266.20 9243.43 110921.20
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6244B Refuse and Stormwater Manager-B Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 68.2806 5462.45 11835.30 142023.65
Step C 70.3291 5626.33 12190.38 146284.53
Step D 72.4390 5795.12 12556.09 150673.12
Step E 74.6122 5968.98 12932.78 155193.38
Step F 76.8506 6148.05 13320.77 159849.25
Step G 79.1560 6332.48 13720.37 164644.48
Step H 81.5308 6522.46 14132.01 169584.06
Step I 83.9766 6718.13 14555.94 174671.33
Step J 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6450B Risk Manager-B Step A 57.4981 4599.85 9966.34 119596.05 Step B 60.8263 4866.10 10543.23 126518.70
Step C 62.6511 5012.09 10859.52 130314.29
Step D 64.5307 5162.46 11185.32 134223.86
Step E 66.4666 5317.33 11520.88 138250.53
Step F 68.4606 5476.85 11866.50 142398.05
Step G 70.5144 5641.15 12222.50 146669.95
Step H 72.6298 5810.38 12589.17 151069.98
Step I 74.8087 5984.70 12966.84 155602.10
Step J 77.0530 6164.24 13355.85 160270.24
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 6500B Safety Coordinator-B Step A 40.9244 3273.95 7093.56 85122.75 Step B 43.2932 3463.46 7504.15 90049.86
Step C 44.5920 3567.36 7729.28 92751.36
Step D 45.9297 3674.38 7961.15 95533.78
Step E 47.3076 3784.61 8199.98 98399.81
Step F 48.7269 3898.15 8446.00 101351.95
Step G 50.1886 4015.09 8699.36 104392.29
Step H 51.6943 4135.54 8960.35 107524.14
Step I 53.2452 4259.62 9229.17 110750.02
Step J 54.8425 4387.40 9506.03 114072.40
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7130B Senior Business Systems Analyst-B Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25 Step B 47.1955 3775.64 8180.55 98166.64
Step C 48.6114 3888.91 8425.98 101111.71
Step D 50.0697 4005.58 8678.75 104144.98
Step E 51.5718 4125.74 8939.11 107269.34
Step F 53.1191 4249.53 9207.31 110487.73
Step G 54.7126 4377.01 9483.52 113802.21
Step H 56.3540 4508.32 9768.03 117216.32
Step I 58.0446 4643.57 10061.06 120732.77
Step J 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7145B Senior Database Analyst-B Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25 Step B 47.1955 3775.64 8180.55 98166.64
Step C 48.6114 3888.91 8425.98 101111.71
Step D 50.0697 4005.58 8678.75 104144.98
Step E 51.5718 4125.74 8939.11 107269.34
Step F 53.1191 4249.53 9207.31 110487.73
Step G 54.7126 4377.01 9483.52 113802.21
Step H 56.3540 4508.32 9768.03 117216.32
Step I 58.0446 4643.57 10061.06 120732.77
Step J 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7123B Senior Deputy City Attorney-B Step A 76.9544 6156.35 13338.76 160065.15 Step B 81.4089 6512.71 14110.88 169330.51
Step C 83.8511 6708.09 14534.19 174410.29
Step D 86.3666 6909.33 14970.21 179642.53
Step E 88.9576 7116.61 15419.32 185031.81
Step F 91.6264 7330.11 15881.91 190582.91
Step G 94.3752 7550.02 16358.37 196300.42
Step H 97.2064 7776.51 16849.11 202189.31
Step I 100.1226 8009.81 17354.58 208255.01
Step J 103.1263 8250.10 17875.23 214502.70
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1281B Senior Development Services
Analyst-B
Step A 39.8919 3191.35 6914.60 82975.15
Step B 42.2010 3376.08 7314.84 87778.08
Step C 43.4671 3477.37 7534.30 90411.57
Step D 44.7711 3581.69 7760.32 93123.89
Step E 46.1142 3689.14 7993.13 95917.54
Step F 47.4976 3799.81 8232.92 98795.01
Step G 48.9226 3913.81 8479.92 101759.01
Step H 50.3902 4031.22 8734.30 104811.62
Step I 51.9019 4152.15 8996.33 107955.95
Step J 53.4590 4276.72 9266.23 111194.72
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1097B Senior Development Services
Business Analyst-B
Step A 43.8811 3510.49 7606.06 91272.69
Step B 46.4211 3713.69 8046.32 96555.89
Step C 47.8138 3825.10 8287.73 99452.70
Step D 49.2482 3939.86 8536.35 102436.26
Step E 50.7256 4058.05 8792.44 105509.25
Step F 52.2474 4179.79 9056.22 108674.59
Step G 53.8149 4305.19 9327.92 111934.99
Step H 55.4292 4434.34 9607.73 115292.74
Step I 57.0921 4567.37 9895.96 118751.57
Step J 58.8049 4704.39 10192.85 122314.19
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7128B Senior Electric Business Analyst-B Step A 57.5905 4607.24 9982.35 119788.24 Step B 60.9242 4873.94 10560.19 126722.34
Step C 62.7519 5020.15 10877.00 130523.95
Step D 64.6345 5170.76 11203.31 134439.76
Step E 66.5735 5325.88 11539.41 138472.88
Step F 68.5707 5485.66 11885.59 142627.06
Step G 70.6278 5650.22 12242.15 146905.82
Step H 72.7466 5819.73 12609.41 151312.93
Step I 74.9290 5994.32 12987.69 155852.32
Step J 77.1769 6174.15 13377.33 160527.95
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1023B Senior Electric Technology Systems
Analyst-B
Step A 59.8944 4791.55 10381.70 124580.35
Step B 63.3613 5068.90 10982.63 131791.50
Step C 65.2621 5220.97 11312.10 135745.17
Step D 67.2200 5377.60 11651.47 139817.60
Step E 69.2366 5538.93 12001.01 144012.13
Step F 71.3136 5705.09 12361.02 148332.29
Step G 73.4531 5876.25 12731.87 152782.45
Step H 75.6567 6052.54 13113.83 157365.94
Step I 77.9264 6234.11 13507.24 162086.91
Step J 80.2642 6421.14 13912.46 166949.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7163B Senior Energy Services Account
Representative-B
Step A 56.6845 4534.76 9825.31 117903.76
Step B 59.9657 4797.26 10394.05 124728.66
Step C 61.7647 4941.18 10705.88 128470.58
Step D 63.6176 5089.41 11027.05 132324.61
Step E 65.5262 5242.10 11357.87 136294.50
Step F 67.4920 5399.36 11698.61 140383.36
Step G 69.5167 5561.34 12049.56 144594.74
Step H 71.6022 5728.18 12411.05 148932.58
Step I 73.7503 5900.02 12783.39 153400.62
Step J 75.9628 6077.02 13166.89 158002.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7142B Senior Engineer-B Step A 50.9976 4079.81 8839.58 106075.01 Step B 53.9497 4315.98 9351.28 112215.38
Step C 55.5682 4445.46 9631.82 115581.86
Step D 57.2352 4578.82 9920.77 119049.22
Step E 58.9522 4716.18 10218.38 122620.58
Step F 60.7208 4857.66 10524.94 126299.26
Step G 62.5424 5003.39 10840.68 130088.19
Step H 64.4187 5153.50 11165.91 133990.90
Step I 66.3513 5308.10 11500.89 138010.70
Step J 68.3418 5467.34 11845.91 142150.94
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1065B Senior Environmental Utilities
Business Analyst-B
Step A 47.2647 3781.18 8192.55 98310.58
Step B 50.0005 4000.04 8666.75 104001.04
Step C 51.5005 4120.04 8926.75 107121.04
Step D 53.0455 4243.64 9194.55 110334.64
Step E 54.6369 4370.95 9470.40 113644.75
Step F 56.2760 4502.08 9754.51 117054.08
Step G 57.9643 4637.14 10047.15 120565.74
Step H 59.7032 4776.26 10348.55 124182.66
Step I 61.4943 4919.54 10659.01 127908.14
Step J 63.3391 5067.13 10978.78 131745.33
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7161B Senior GIS Analyst-B Step A 43.6911 3495.29 7573.12 90877.49 Step B 46.2201 3697.61 8011.48 96137.81
Step C 47.6067 3808.54 8251.83 99021.94
Step D 49.0349 3922.79 8499.38 101992.59
Step E 50.5060 4040.48 8754.37 105052.48
Step F 52.0211 4161.69 9016.99 108203.89
Step G 53.5818 4286.54 9287.51 111450.14
Step H 55.1892 4415.14 9566.13 114793.54
Step I 56.8449 4547.59 9853.12 118237.39
Step J 58.5503 4684.02 10148.72 121784.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7150B Senior Human Resources Analyst-B Step A 45.4521 3636.17 7878.36 94540.37 Step B 48.0828 3846.62 8334.35 100012.22
Step C 49.5253 3962.02 8584.39 103012.62
Step D 51.0110 4080.88 8841.91 106102.88
Step E 52.5414 4203.31 9107.18 109286.11
Step F 54.1177 4329.42 9380.40 112564.82
Step G 55.7412 4459.30 9661.81 115941.70
Step H 57.4133 4593.06 9951.64 119419.66
Step I 59.1357 4730.86 10250.19 123002.26
Step J 60.9099 4872.79 10557.72 126692.59
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7194B Senior Information Technology
Analyst-B
Step A 44.6131 3569.05 7732.94 92795.25
Step B 47.1955 3775.64 8180.55 98166.64
Step C 48.6114 3888.91 8425.98 101111.71
Step D 50.0697 4005.58 8678.75 104144.98
Step E 51.5718 4125.74 8939.11 107269.34
Step F 53.1191 4249.53 9207.31 110487.73
Step G 54.7126 4377.01 9483.52 113802.21
Step H 56.3540 4508.32 9768.03 117216.32
Step I 58.0446 4643.57 10061.06 120732.77
Step J 59.7860 4782.88 10362.91 124354.88
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1119B Senior Park Development Project
Manager-B
Step A 45.0167 3601.34 7802.89 93634.74
Step B 47.6225 3809.80 8254.57 99054.80
Step C 49.0512 3924.10 8502.21 102026.50
Step D 50.5227 4041.82 8757.27 105087.22
Step E 52.0384 4163.07 9019.99 108239.87
Step F 53.5995 4287.96 9290.58 111486.96
Step G 55.2075 4416.60 9569.30 114831.60
Step H 56.8637 4549.10 9856.37 118276.50
Step I 58.5697 4685.58 10152.08 121824.98
Step J 60.3268 4826.14 10456.65 125479.74
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7180B Senior Planner-B Step A 46.3003 3704.02 8025.39 96304.62 Step B 48.9804 3918.43 8489.94 101879.23
Step C 50.4498 4035.98 8744.63 104935.58
Step D 51.9632 4157.06 9006.95 108083.46
Step E 53.5221 4281.77 9277.16 111325.97
Step F 55.1278 4410.22 9555.49 114665.82
Step G 56.7816 4542.53 9842.14 118105.73
Step H 58.4851 4678.81 10137.42 121649.01
Step I 60.2396 4819.17 10441.53 125298.37
Step J 62.0468 4963.74 10754.78 129057.34
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7151B Senior Power Engineer-B Step A 71.0796 5686.37 12320.46 147845.57 Step B 75.1940 6015.52 13033.63 156403.52
Step C 77.4497 6195.98 13424.61 161095.38
Step D 79.7733 6381.86 13827.37 165928.46
Step E 82.1664 6573.31 14242.18 170906.11
Step F 84.6314 6770.51 14669.44 176033.31
Step G 87.1704 6973.63 15109.54 181314.43
Step H 89.7855 7182.84 15562.82 186753.84
Step I 92.4791 7398.33 16029.71 192356.53
Step J 95.2534 7620.27 16510.59 198127.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 5555B Senior Power Plant Engineer-B Step A 71.0796 5686.37 12320.46 147845.57 Step B 75.1940 6015.52 13033.63 156403.52
Step C 77.4497 6195.98 13424.61 161095.38
Step D 79.7733 6381.86 13827.37 165928.46
Step E 82.1664 6573.31 14242.18 170906.11
Step F 84.6314 6770.51 14669.44 176033.31
Step G 87.1704 6973.63 15109.54 181314.43
Step H 89.7855 7182.84 15562.82 186753.84
Step I 92.4791 7398.33 16029.71 192356.53
Step J 95.2534 7620.27 16510.59 198127.07
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1029B Senior Utility Billing Analyst-B Step A 44.5864 3566.91 7728.31 92739.71 Step B 47.1673 3773.38 8175.67 98107.98
Step C 48.5823 3886.58 8420.93 101051.18
Step D 50.0397 4003.18 8673.55 104082.58
Step E 51.5410 4123.28 8933.77 107205.28
Step F 53.0871 4246.97 9201.76 110421.17
Step G 54.6798 4374.38 9477.83 113733.98
Step H 56.3202 4505.62 9762.17 117146.02
Step I 58.0098 4640.78 10055.03 120660.38
Step J 59.7501 4780.01 10356.68 124280.21
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1073B Street Maintenance Manager-B Step A 57.0743 4565.94 9892.88 118714.54 Step B 60.3780 4830.24 10465.52 125586.24
Step C 62.1893 4975.14 10779.48 129353.74
Step D 64.0549 5124.39 11102.85 133234.19
Step E 65.9767 5278.14 11435.96 137231.54
Step F 67.9560 5436.48 11779.04 141348.48
Step G 69.9946 5599.57 12132.40 145588.77
Step H 72.0944 5767.55 12496.36 149956.35
Step I 74.2573 5940.58 12871.27 154455.18
Step J 76.4850 6118.80 13257.40 159088.80
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 7522B Street Maintenance Supervisor-B Step A 37.0884 2967.07 6428.66 77143.87 Step B 39.2352 3138.82 6800.77 81609.22
Step C 40.4122 3232.98 7004.78 84057.38
Step D 41.6246 3329.97 7214.93 86579.17
Step E 42.8733 3429.86 7431.37 89176.46
Step F 44.1595 3532.76 7654.31 91851.76
Step G 45.4843 3638.74 7883.95 94607.34
Step H 46.8489 3747.91 8120.48 97445.71
Step I 48.2543 3860.34 8364.08 100368.94
Step J 49.7019 3976.15 8615.00 103379.95
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1110B Transit Operations Supervisor-B Step A 45.0168 3601.34 7802.91 93634.94 Step B 47.6225 3809.80 8254.57 99054.80
Step C 49.0512 3924.10 8502.21 102026.50
Step D 50.5227 4041.82 8757.27 105087.22
Step E 52.0383 4163.06 9019.97 108239.66
Step F 53.5995 4287.96 9290.58 111486.96
Step G 55.2075 4416.60 9569.30 114831.60
Step H 56.8637 4549.10 9856.37 118276.50
Step I 58.5697 4685.58 10152.08 121824.98
Step J 60.3267 4826.14 10456.63 125479.54
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8762B Urban Forester-B Step A 38.8334 3106.67 6731.12 80773.47 Step B 41.0810 3286.48 7120.71 85448.48
Step C 42.3134 3385.07 7334.32 88011.87
Step D 43.5829 3486.63 7554.37 90652.43
Step E 44.8904 3591.23 7781.00 93372.03
Step F 46.2370 3698.96 8014.41 96172.96
Step G 47.6242 3809.94 8254.86 99058.34
Step H 49.0530 3924.24 8502.52 102030.24
Step I 50.5246 4041.97 8757.60 105091.17
Step J 52.0402 4163.22 9020.30 108243.62
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 0920B Utility Billing Operations Manager-B Step A 57.8472 4627.78 10026.85 120322.18 Step B 61.1956 4895.65 10607.24 127286.85
Step C 63.0315 5042.52 10925.46 131105.52
Step D 64.9224 5193.79 11253.22 135038.59
Step E 66.8701 5349.61 11590.82 139089.81
Step F 68.8762 5510.10 11938.54 143262.50
Step G 70.9426 5675.41 12296.72 147560.61
Step H 73.0708 5845.66 12665.61 151987.26
Step I 75.2630 6021.04 13045.59 156547.04
Step J 77.5208 6201.66 13436.94 161243.26
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1041B Utility Billing and Field Services
Supervisor-B
Step A 44.1208 3529.66 7647.61 91771.26
Step B 46.6746 3733.97 8090.26 97083.17
Step C 48.0748 3845.98 8332.97 99995.58
Step D 49.5171 3961.37 8582.96 102995.57
Step E 51.0026 4080.21 8840.45 106085.41
Step F 52.5327 4202.62 9105.67 109268.02
Step G 54.1087 4328.70 9378.84 112546.10
Step H 55.7319 4458.55 9660.20 115922.35
Step I 57.4039 4592.31 9950.01 119400.11
Step J 59.1260 4730.08 10248.51 122982.08
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1042B Utility Customer Service Supervisor-B Step A 32.1431 2571.45 5571.47 66857.65 Step B 34.0036 2720.29 5893.96 70727.49
Step C 35.0237 2801.90 6070.77 72849.30
Step D 36.0744 2885.95 6252.90 75034.75
Step E 37.1567 2972.54 6440.49 77285.94
Step F 38.2714 3061.71 6633.71 79604.51
Step G 39.4196 3153.57 6832.73 81992.77
Step H 40.6021 3248.17 7037.70 84452.37
Step I 41.8202 3345.62 7248.83 86986.02
Step J 43.0748 3445.98 7466.30 89595.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1102B Utility Exploration Center SupervisorB Step A 38.3480 3067.84 6646.99 79763.84 Step B 40.5672 3245.38 7031.65 84379.78
Step C 41.7842 3342.74 7242.59 86911.14
Step D 43.0377 3443.02 7459.87 89518.42
Step E 44.3289 3546.31 7683.68 92204.11
Step F 45.6587 3652.70 7914.17 94970.10
Step G 47.0285 3762.28 8151.61 97819.28
Step H 48.4393 3875.14 8396.15 100753.74
Step I 49.8925 3991.40 8648.03 103776.40
Step J 51.3897 4111.18 8907.55 106890.58
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 1646B Utility Government Relations
Administrator-B
Step A 49.1077 3928.62 8512.00 102144.02
Step B 51.9501 4156.01 9004.68 108056.21
Step C 53.5086 4280.69 9274.82 111297.89
Step D 55.1139 4409.11 9553.08 114636.91
Step E 56.7673 4541.38 9839.67 118075.98
Step F 58.4703 4677.62 10134.85 121618.22
Step G 60.2244 4817.95 10438.90 125266.75
Step H 62.0311 4962.49 10752.06 129024.69
Step I 63.8921 5111.37 11074.63 132895.57
Step J 65.8089 5264.71 11406.88 136882.51
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8980B Wastewater Collection
Superintendent-B
Step A 47.9372 3834.98 8309.11 99709.38
Step B 50.7120 4056.96 8790.08 105480.96
Step C 52.2333 4178.66 9053.77 108645.26
Step D 53.8003 4304.02 9325.39 111904.62
Step E 55.4144 4433.15 9605.16 115261.95
Step F 57.0768 4566.14 9893.31 118719.74
Step G 58.7891 4703.13 10190.11 122281.33
Step H 60.5527 4844.22 10495.80 125949.62
Step I 62.3693 4989.54 10810.68 129728.14
Step J 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 8978B Wastewater Collection Supervisor-B Step A 39.9500 3196.00 6924.67 83096.00 Step B 42.2621 3380.97 7325.43 87905.17
Step C 43.5300 3482.40 7545.20 90542.40
Step D 44.8359 3586.87 7771.56 93258.67
Step E 46.1809 3694.47 8004.69 96056.27
Step F 47.5664 3805.31 8244.84 98938.11
Step G 48.9934 3919.47 8492.19 101906.27
Step H 50.4632 4037.06 8746.95 104963.46
Step I 51.9771 4158.17 9009.36 108112.37
Step J 53.5364 4282.91 9279.64 111355.71
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9040B Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-B
Step A 52.7315 4218.52 9140.13 109681.52
Step B 55.7836 4462.69 9669.16 116029.89
Step C 57.4572 4596.58 9959.25 119510.98
Step D 59.1809 4734.47 10258.02 123096.27
Step E 60.9563 4876.50 10565.76 126789.10
Step F 62.7850 5022.80 10882.73 130592.80
Step G 64.6686 5173.49 11209.22 134510.69
Step H 66.6087 5328.70 11545.51 138546.10
Step I 68.6069 5488.55 11891.86 142702.35
Step J 70.6651 5653.21 12248.62 146983.41
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9045B Wastewater Utility Manager-B Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 68.2806 5462.45 11835.30 142023.65
Step C 70.3291 5626.33 12190.38 146284.53
Step D 72.4390 5795.12 12556.09 150673.12
Step E 74.6122 5968.98 12932.78 155193.38
Step F 76.8506 6148.05 13320.77 159849.25
Step G 79.1560 6332.48 13720.37 164644.48
Step H 81.5308 6522.46 14132.01 169584.06
Step I 83.9766 6718.13 14555.94 174671.33
Step J 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9047B Water Conservation Administrator-B Step A 43.9422 3515.38 7616.65 91399.78 Step B 46.4860 3718.88 8057.57 96690.88
Step C 47.8805 3830.44 8299.29 99591.44
Step D 49.3170 3945.36 8548.28 102579.36
Step E 50.7964 4063.71 8804.71 105656.51
Step F 52.3204 4185.63 9068.87 108826.43
Step G 53.8899 4311.19 9340.92 112090.99
Step H 55.5067 4440.54 9621.16 115453.94
Step I 57.1718 4573.74 9909.78 118917.34
Step J 58.8870 4710.96 10207.08 122484.96
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9085B Water Distribution Superintendent-B Step A 47.2302 3778.42 8186.57 98238.82 Step B 50.7120 4056.96 8790.08 105480.96
Step C 52.2333 4178.66 9053.77 108645.26
Step D 53.8003 4304.02 9325.39 111904.62
Step E 55.4144 4433.15 9605.16 115261.95
Step F 57.0768 4566.14 9893.31 118719.74
Step G 58.7891 4703.13 10190.11 122281.33
Step H 60.5527 4844.22 10495.80 125949.62
Step I 62.3693 4989.54 10810.68 129728.14
Step J 64.2404 5139.23 11135.00 133620.03
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9084B Water Distribution Supervisor-B Step A 39.9499 3195.99 6924.65 83095.79 Step B 42.2621 3380.97 7325.43 87905.17
Step C 43.5300 3482.40 7545.20 90542.40
Step D 44.8359 3586.87 7771.56 93258.67
Step E 46.1809 3694.47 8004.69 96056.27
Step F 47.5664 3805.31 8244.84 98938.11
Step G 48.9934 3919.47 8492.19 101906.27
Step H 50.4632 4037.06 8746.95 104963.46
Step I 51.9771 4158.17 9009.36 108112.37
Step J 53.5364 4282.91 9279.64 111355.71
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9101B Water Quality Lab Supervisor-B Step A 41.9458 3355.66 7270.61 87247.26 Step B 44.3736 3549.89 7691.42 92297.09
Step C 45.7048 3656.38 7922.17 95065.98
Step D 47.0759 3766.07 8159.82 97917.87
Step E 48.4882 3879.06 8404.62 100855.46
Step F 49.9429 3995.43 8656.77 103881.23
Step G 51.4412 4115.30 8916.47 106997.70
Step H 52.9844 4238.75 9183.96 110207.55
Step I 54.5739 4365.91 9459.48 113513.71
Step J 56.2112 4496.90 9743.27 116919.30
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9175B Water Treatment Plant Chief
Operator-B
Step A 47.9376 3835.01 8309.18 99710.21
Step B 50.7125 4057.00 8790.17 105482.00
Step C 52.2339 4178.71 9053.88 108646.51
Step D 53.8009 4304.07 9325.49 111905.87
Step E 55.4149 4433.19 9605.25 115262.99
Step F 57.0773 4566.18 9893.40 118720.78
Step G 58.7897 4703.18 10190.21 122282.58
Step H 60.5533 4844.26 10495.91 125950.86
Step I 62.3699 4989.59 10810.78 129729.39
Step J 64.2411 5139.29 11135.12 133621.49
MGMT Management

City of Roseville

Appendix:I
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Management-B
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly Bi-Weekly Monthly Annual 9244B Water Utility Manager-B Step A 64.5449 5163.59 11187.78 134253.39 Step B 68.2806 5462.45 11835.30 142023.65
Step C 70.3291 5626.33 12190.38 146284.53
Step D 72.4390 5795.12 12556.09 150673.12
Step E 74.6122 5968.98 12932.78 155193.38
Step F 76.8506 6148.05 13320.77 159849.25
Step G 79.1560 6332.48 13720.37 164644.48
Step H 81.5308 6522.46 14132.01 169584.06
Step I 83.9766 6718.13 14555.94 174671.33
Step J 86.4959 6919.67 14992.62 179911.47
ORDINANCE NO. 6702

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6696, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR SEASONAL/TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “R” TO BE EFFECTIVE
AUGUST 26, 2023, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Title and Purpose.

Ordinance No. 6696, the Salary Ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, is hereby amended as shown on Appendix “R” attached hereto.

ADDITION OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
1127 Community Outreach Specialist $41.20

AMENDMENT OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
6252 Reserve Police Officer I $52.16

DELETION OF CLASSIFICATION
Classification No. Position Title Hourly Rate
9526 Police Reserve Officer I $18.84
SECTION 2. Salary Plan Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be effective August 26, 2023, as an urgency measure.

SECTION 3. Urgency Ordinance.

This ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure, immediately necessary for the public peace, health and safety and shall take effect August 26, 2023. A statement of urgency is as follows:

It is necessary to amend the Salary Ordinance to comply with recently approved changes for the orderly and necessary continuance of operations of the City.

SECTION 4. Posting.

The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the Ordinance Book under the record of the ordinance a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _________________, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
_____________________________
ATTEST: MAYOR
_________________________
City Clerk
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
CI30 Activity Instructor Step A 0.0000
3745 Aqua Fitness Instructor I Step A 38.0000
3747 Aqua Fitness Instructor II Step A 51.0000
1100 Aquatics Facilities Maintenance
Worker
Step A 18.0000
Step B 18.4445
Step C 18.9000
Step D 19.3667
Step E 19.8450
Step F 20.3351
Step G 20.8373
Step H 21.3518
Step I 21.8791
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9503 Assistant Pool Manager I Step A 19.1009
Step B 0.0000
Step C 0.0000
Step D 0.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1077 Assistant Pool Manager II Step A 20.0556
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9505 Building Inspection Assistant Step A 15.5000
Step B 15.8828
Step C 16.2750
Step D 16.6769
Step E 17.0888
Step F 17.5108
Step G 17.9432
Step H 18.3863
Step I 18.8404
9507 Child Care Aide Step A 15.7500
Step B 16.1389
Step C 16.5375
Step D 16.9459
Step E 17.3644
Step F 17.7932
Step G 18.2326
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9506 Child Care Program Assistant Step A 18.9939
Step B 19.4630
Step C 19.9436
Step D 20.4361
Step E 20.9408
Step F 21.4579
Step G 21.9879
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1010 Child Care Program Leader Step A 22.7928
Step B 23.3557
Step C 23.9324
Step D 24.5235
Step E 25.1291
Step F 25.7496
Step G 26.3855
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9508 Child Care Teacher Step A 16.5375
Step B 16.9459
Step C 17.3644
Step D 17.7932
Step E 18.2326
Step F 18.6829
Step G 19.1442
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
CI10 Class Instructor Step A 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1230 College Intern Step A 15.5000
Step B 16.2750
Step C 17.0888
Step D 17.9432
Step E 18.8403
Step F 19.7824
Step G 20.7715
Step H 21.8101
Step I 22.9006
Step J 24.0456
Step K 25.2479
Step L 26.5103
Step M 27.8358
Step N 29.2276
Step O 30.6889
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1127 Community Outreach Specialist Step A 33.8978
Step B 34.7349
Step C 35.5926
Step D 36.4716
Step E 37.3723
Step F 38.2952
Step G 39.2409
Step H 40.2100
Step I 41.2029
1270 Council Member Step A 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1080 Customer Service Specialist I Step A 16.5000
Step B 16.9075
Step C 17.3250
Step D 17.7528
Step E 18.1913
Step F 18.6405
Step G 19.1008
Step H 19.5725
Step I 20.0559
1081 Customer Service Specialist II Step A 18.1500
Step B 18.5982
Step C 19.0575
Step D 19.5281
Step E 20.0104
Step F 20.5045
Step G 21.0109
Step H 21.5298
Step I 22.0614
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9509 Engineering Aide Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
1020 Event Recreation Program Leader Step A 21.8099
1014 Event Specialist I Step A 18.8403
1015 Event Specialist II Step A 19.7823
1016 Event Specialist III Step A 20.7714
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9510 Fire Equipment Specialist Step A 16.5421
Step B 16.8851
Step C 17.3072
Step D 17.7399
Step E 18.1834
Step F 18.6380
Step G 19.1039
Step H 19.5815
Step I 20.0711
Step J 20.5729
Step K 21.0872
Step L 21.6144
Step M 22.1547
Step N 22.7086
Step O 23.2763
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9511 Fire Logistics Worker Step A 16.5421
Step B 16.8851
Step C 17.3072
Step D 17.7399
Step E 18.1834
Step F 18.6380
Step G 19.1039
Step H 19.5815
Step I 20.0711
Step J 20.5729
Step K 21.0872
Step L 21.6144
Step M 22.1547
Step N 22.7086
Step O 23.2763
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9512 Fire Public Education Coordinator Step A 20.5700
Step B 21.3636
Step C 21.8977
Step D 22.4452
Step E 23.0063
Step F 23.5815
Step G 24.1710
Step H 24.7753
Step I 25.3946
Step J 26.0295
Step K 26.6802
Step L 27.3473
Step M 28.0309
Step N 28.7317
Step O 29.4500
CI20 Fitness Instructor-Fee Step A 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3735 Fitness Instructor-Hourly Step A 30.0000
Step B 31.0000
Step C 32.0000
Step D 33.0000
Step E 34.0000
Step F 35.0000
1079 Instructor Hourly Step A 23.0000
Step B 24.0000
Step C 25.0000
Step D 26.0000
Step E 27.0000
Step F 28.0000
Step G 29.0000
Step H 30.0000
Step I 31.0000
3750 Instructor Meeting Rate Step A 18.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9513 Interpretive Services Program
Assistant
Step A 16.2750
Step B 16.6769
Step C 17.0888
Step D 17.5108
Step E 17.9432
Step F 18.3863
Step G 18.8403
Step H 19.3056
Step I 19.7824
9514 Interpretive Services Program Leader Step A 17.9432 Step B 18.3863
Step C 18.8403
Step D 19.3056
Step E 19.7824
Step F 20.2709
Step G 20.7715
Step H 21.2844
Step I 21.8101
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9515 Library Page Step A 15.5000
Step B 15.8828
Step C 16.2750
Step D 16.6769
Step E 17.0888
Step F 17.5108
Step G 17.9432
Step H 18.3863
Step I 18.8404
1074 Lifeguard Step A 16.5000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9518 Maintenance Assistant Step A 16.0000
Step B 16.3951
Step C 16.8000
Step D 17.2149
Step E 17.6400
Step F 18.0756
Step G 18.5220
Step H 18.9794
Step I 19.4481
Step J 19.9284
Step K 20.4205
Step L 20.9248
Step M 21.4415
Step N 21.9710
Step O 22.5136
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9519 Marketing Technician Step A 20.8116
Step B 21.3255
Step C 21.8522
Step D 22.3918
Step E 22.9448
Step F 23.5114
Step G 24.0920
Step H 24.6870
Step I 25.2966
Step J 25.9213
Step K 26.5615
Step L 27.2174
Step M 27.8895
Step N 28.5783
Step O 29.2840
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9521 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker
Step A 18.0000
Step B 18.4445
Step C 18.9000
Step D 19.3667
Step E 19.8450
Step F 20.3351
Step G 20.8373
Step H 21.3518
Step I 21.8791
1011 Parks and Facility Maintenance
Worker-Commercial Driver
Step A 18.9000
Step B 19.3667
Step C 19.8450
Step D 20.3351
Step E 20.8373
Step F 21.3518
Step G 21.8791
Step H 22.4194
Step I 22.9731
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9523 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator
Step A 23.7700
Step B 24.3570
Step C 24.9585
Step D 25.5749
Step E 26.2064
Step F 26.8536
Step G 27.5168
Step H 28.1963
Step I 28.8926
1012 Parks and Open Space Equipment
Operator-Commerical Driver
Step A 24.9585
Step B 25.5749
Step C 26.2064
Step D 26.8536
Step E 27.5167
Step F 28.1963
Step G 28.8926
Step H 29.6061
Step I 30.3372
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
3749 Personal Trainer I Step A 37.0000
1070 Personal Trainer II Step A 40.0000
1071 Personal Trainer III Step A 45.0000
1072 Personal Trainer IV Step A 50.0000
9525 Police Cadet Step A 23.4058
Step B 24.5062
Step C 25.2414
Step D 25.9986
Step E 26.7787
Step F 27.5820
Step G 28.4094
Step H 29.2617
Step I 30.1396
Step J 31.0438
Step K 31.9751
Step L 32.9343
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9527 Pool Manager I Step A 21.0587
Step B 0.0000
Step C 0.0000
Step D 0.0000
Step E 0.0000
Step F 0.0000
Step G 0.0000
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
1078 Pool Manager II Step A 22.1116
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9528 Preschool Teacher Step A 18.9939
Step B 19.4630
Step C 19.9436
Step D 20.4361
Step E 20.9408
Step F 21.4579
Step G 21.9879
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
6110 Recreation Aide Step A 13.1750
Step B 15.5000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9532 Recreation Program Leader Step A 17.9432
Step B 18.3863
Step C 18.8403
Step D 19.3056
Step E 19.7824
Step F 20.2709
Step G 20.7715
Step H 21.2844
Step I 21.8101
9533 Recreation Specialist I Step A 15.5000
Step B 15.8828
Step C 16.2750
Step D 16.6769
Step E 17.0888
Step F 17.5108
Step G 17.9432
Step H 18.3863
Step I 18.8404
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9534 Recreation Specialist II Step A 16.2750
Step B 16.6769
Step C 17.0888
Step D 17.5108
Step E 17.9432
Step F 18.3863
Step G 18.8403
Step H 19.3056
Step I 19.7824
9535 Recreation Specialist III Step A 17.0888
Step B 17.5108
Step C 17.9432
Step D 18.3863
Step E 18.8403
Step F 19.3056
Step G 19.7824
Step H 20.2709
Step I 20.7715
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
6252 Reserve Police Officer I Step A 40.9115
Step B 42.1737
Step C 43.4748
Step D 44.8159
Step E 46.2000
Step F 47.6239
Step G 49.0931
Step H 50.6077
Step I 52.1691
6250 Reserve Police Officer II (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
6248 Reserve Police Officer III (Unpaid) Step A 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9536 School Crossing Guard Step A 15.5000
Step B 15.8828
Step C 16.2750
Step D 16.6769
Step E 17.0888
Step F 17.5108
Step G 17.9432
Step H 18.3863
Step I 18.8404
9538 Senior Child Care Teacher Step A 17.3644
Step B 17.7932
Step C 18.2326
Step D 18.6829
Step E 19.1442
Step F 19.6170
Step G 20.1014
Step H 0.0000
Step I 0.0000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
1075 Senior Lifeguard I Step A 17.3250
1076 Senior Lifeguard II Step A 18.1913
9537 Senior School Crossing Guard Step A 17.0500
Step B 17.4711
Step C 17.9025
Step D 18.3446
Step E 18.7976
Step F 19.2618
Step G 19.7375
Step H 20.2249
Step I 20.7244
7005 Soccer Official Step A 60.0000
7207 Sports Official/Scorer I Step A 17.5000
7208 Sports Official/Scorer II Step A 19.5000
9552 Swim Instructor Aide Step A 16.5000
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9553 Swim Instructor I Step A 17.5000
9554 Swim Instructor II Step A 18.5000
9539 Video Technician Step A 21.5676
Step B 22.1002
Step C 22.6460
Step D 23.2052
Step E 23.7783
Step F 24.3655
Step G 24.9672
Step H 25.5838
Step I 26.2156
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
8941 Vocational Intern Step A 15.5000
Step B 16.2750
Step C 17.0888
Step D 17.9432
Step E 18.8403
Step F 19.7824
Step G 20.7715
Step H 21.8101
Step I 22.9006
Step J 24.0456
Step K 25.2479
Step L 26.5103
Step M 27.8358
Step N 29.2276
Step O 30.6889
TEMP Temporary
City of Roseville
Appendix:R
Effective Date:08/26/2023
Salary Schedule: Temporary--
Grade Code Grade Name Step Name Hourly
9540 Water Conservation Helper Step A 15.5000
Step B 15.8828
Step C 16.2750
Step D 16.6769
Step E 17.0888
Step F 17.5108
Step G 17.9432
Step H 18.3863
Step I 18.8404
Report as of Date: 08/26/23
Position Code Allocated FTE
CAO220245001 1
CAO221200001 1
CAO221658002 1
CAO221658001 1
CAO224096002 1
CAO224096001 1
CAO225015001 1
CAO227123003 1
CAO227123002 1
CAO227123001 1
CAO City Attorney 10
Position Code Allocated FTE
CCD360250001 1
CCD361220001 1
CCD361227005 1
CCD361227004 1
CCD361227003 1
CCD361227002 1
CCD361227001 1
CCD361665002 1
CCD361665001 1
CCD369548006 0.5
CCD369548004 0.5
CCD369548002 1
CCD369548001 1
CCD City Clerk Department 12
Passport/Livescan Agent
Passport/Livescan Agent
Total for Department:

Deputy City Clerk I/ll
Passport/Livescan Agent
Passport/Livescan Agent
City Clerk Technician I/II
City Clerk Technician I/II
Deputy City Clerk I/ll
City Clerk Technician I/II
City Clerk Technician I/II
City Clerk Technician I/II
Assistant City Clerk
City Clerk
Position Title
Senior Deputy City Attorney
Total for Department:

Paralegal
Senior Deputy City Attorney
Senior Deputy City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney I/II
Legal Clerk I/II
Legal Clerk I/II
Assistant City Attorney
City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney I/II
Position Title
Position Allocation Control Report
Position Code Allocated FTE
CMO140325002 1
CMO140325001 1
CMO141240001 1
CMO142551002 1
CMO142551001 1
CMO1414449001 1
CMO144457001 1
CMO City Manager 7
Position Code Allocated FTE
DSD660071001 1
DSD660084001 1
DSD661005005 1
DSD661005004 1
DSD661005003 1
DSD661005002 1
DSD661005001 1
DSD660820003 1
DSD660820001 1
DSD660900006 1
DSD660900005 1
DSD660900004 1
DSD660900003 1
DSD660900002 1
DSD660900001 1
DSD661017001 1
DSD661019008 1
DSD661019007 1
DSD661019006 1
DSD661019005 1
DSD661019004 1
DSD661019003 1
DSD661019002 1
DSD661019001 1
DSD661043001 1
DSD661047004 1
DSD661047003 1
DSD661047002 1
DSD661047001 1
DSD661369005 1
DSD661369004 1
DSD661369003 1
Code Enforcement Inspector I/II
Code Enforcement Inspector I/II
Code Enforcement Inspector I/II
Building Plans Examiner I/II
Building Plans Examiner I/II
Building Plans Examiner I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Official
Building Plans Examiner I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Building Inspector I/II
Associate/Assistant Planner
Building Inspection Supervisor
Building Inspector I/II
Associate/Assistant Planner
Associate/Assistant Planner
Associate/Assistant Planner
Associate Engineer
Associate/Assistant Planner
Associate/Assistant Planner
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Technician
Position Title
Management Analyst ‐ City Manager
Management Assistant I/II
Total for Department:

City Manager
Executive Assistant
Executive Assistant
Assistant City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Position Title
DSD661369002 1
DSD661369001 1
DSD661368001 1
DSD661027001 1
DSD661248001 1
DSD661434005 1
DSD661434004 1
DSD661434003 1
DSD661434002 1
DSD661434001 1
DSD661280001 1
DSD661096002 1
DSD661096001 1
DSD661676001 1
DSD661695001 1
DSD661672005 1
DSD661672004 1
DSD661672003 1
DSD661672002 1
DSD661672001 1
DSD661277001 1
DSD662540001 1
DSD663412001 1
DSD662214001 1
DSD660050001 1
DSD664957002 1
DSD664957001 1
DSD665279004 1
DSD665279003 1
DSD665279002 1
DSD665279001 1
DSD661501001 1
DSD665309001 1
DSD665514001 1
DSD667117001 1
DSD667195001 1
DSD667121002 1
DSD667121001 1
DSD661097001 1
DSD667142003 1
DSD667142002 1
DSD661502001 1
DSD667180002 1
DSD667180001 1
DSD Development Services Department 76
Senior Planner
Total for Department:

Senior Engineer
Senior Permits Technician
Senior Planner
Senior Construction Inspector
Senior Development Services Business Analyst
Senior Engineer
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Building Plans Examiner
Senior Construction Inspector
Permits Supervisor
Planning Manager
Principal Engineer
Permit Technician I/II
Permit Technician I/II
Permit Technician I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Permit Technician I/II
GIS Analyst I/II
GIS Technician I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Environmental Coordinator
Development Technician I/II
Development Technician I/II
Engineering Manager
Development Technician I/II
Development Technician I/II
Development Technician I/II
Development Services Business Analyst I/II
Development Services Director
Development Services Manager
Construction Inspector I/II
Development Services Administrator
Development Services Business Analyst I/II
Construction Inspector I/II
Construction Inspector I/II
Construction Inspector I/II
Construction Inspection Superintendent
Construction Inspection Supervisor
Construction Inspector I/II
Code Enforcement Inspector I/II
Code Enforcement Inspector I/II
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Position Code Allocated FTE
EDD541675001 1
EDD541710001 1
EDD541001002 1
EDD541001001 1
EDD543402004 1
EDD543402003 1
EDD543402002 1
EDD543402001 1
EDD543589001 1
EDD543590001 1
EDD543592004 1
EDD543592003 1
EDD543592002 1
EDD543592001 1
EDD540050001 1
EDD544957001 1
EDD547148001 1
EDD Economic Development
Department
17 Position Code Allocated FTE
ELE701505001 1
ELE700071001 1
ELE700084005 1
ELE700084003 1
ELE700084002 1
ELE700084001 1
ELE700395004 1
ELE700395003 1
ELE700395002 1
ELE700395001 1
ELE701067008 1
ELE701067007 1
ELE701067006 1
ELE701067005 1
ELE701067004 1
ELE701067003 1
ELE701067002 1
ELE701067001 1
ELE701548002 1
ELE701645001 1
ELE701312008 1
Data Management Specialist I/II
Department Public Information Officer
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Assistant Electric Utility Director
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Associate/Assistant Electric Analyst
Assistant Electric Utility Director
Assistant Electric Utility Director
Assistant Electric Utility Director
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
AMI Project Manager
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Technician
Position Title
Total for Department:

Management Analyst I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Senior Housing Technician
Housing Technician I/II
Housing Technician I/II
Housing Technician I/II
Housing Manager
Housing Supervisor
Housing Technician I/II
Housing Analyst I/II
Housing Analyst I/II
Housing Analyst I/II
Economic Development Project Manager
Economic Development Project Manager
Housing Analyst I/II
Economic Development Analyst I/II
Economic Development Director
Position Title
ELE701312006 1
ELE701312004 1
ELE701312003 1
ELE701312002 1
ELE701312001 1
ELE701312007 1
ELE702335002 1
ELE702335001 1
ELE706285001 1
ELE702330002 1
ELE701117001 1
ELE702345005 1
ELE702345004 1
ELE702345003 1
ELE702345001 1
ELE702284001 1
ELE702286004 1
ELE702286003 1
ELE702286002 1
ELE702286001 1
ELE702212004 1
ELE702212003 1
ELE702212002 1
ELE702212001 1
ELE702338001 1
ELE702339002 1
ELE702339001 1
ELE702254001 1
ELE702316005 1
ELE702316003 1
ELE702316002 1
ELE702316001 1
ELE702216001 1
ELE702319001 1
ELE702350003 1
ELE702350002 1
ELE702350001 1
ELE702359003 1
ELE702359002 1
ELE702359001 1
ELE709560001 1
ELE701116001 1
ELE702320001 1
ELE702215001 1
ELE709250003 1
ELE709250002 1
ELE709250001 1
ELE702285015 1
Electric Utility Inspection Technician
Electric Utility Inspection Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric Utility Director
Electric Utility Financial Administrator
Electric Utility Inspection Technician
Electric Technology System Technician
Electric Technology Systems Administrator
Electric Utility Chief Operating Officer
Electric System Dispatcher
Electric Technology System Technician
Electric Technology System Technician
Electric Substation Supervisor
Electric System Dispatcher
Electric System Dispatcher
Electric Resources Planner I/II
Electric Resources Planner I/II
Electric Risk and Compliance Supervisor
Electric Preventive Data System Technician
Electric Resources Planner I/II
Electric Resources Planner I/II
Electric Operations Manager
Electric Operations Supervisor
Electric Operations Supervisor
Electric Materials Technician I/II
Electric Materials Technician I/II
Electric Materials Technician I/II
Electric Line Troubleshooter
Electric Line Troubleshooter
Electric Materials Technician I/II
Electric Engineering Technician Supervisor
Electric Line Troubleshooter
Electric Line Troubleshooter
Electric Engineering Technician I/II
Electric Engineering Technician I/II
Electric Engineering Technician I/II
Electric Drafting Technician I/II
Electric Economic Development and Partnership
Electric Engineering Technician I/II
Electric Compliance Analyst I/II
Electric Compliance Analyst I/II
Electric Customer Programs Supervisor
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Electric Business Analyst I/II
Electric Business Analyst I/II
ELE702285014 1
ELE702285013 1
ELE702285012 1
ELE702285011 1
ELE702285010 1
ELE702285009 1
ELE702285008 1
ELE702285007 1
ELE702285006 1
ELE702285005 1
ELE702285004 1
ELE702285003 1
ELE702285001 1
ELE701085005 1
ELE701085004 1
ELE701085003 1
ELE701085002 1
ELE701085001 1
ELE701083012 1
ELE701083011 1
ELE701083010 1
ELE701083009 1
ELE701083008 1
ELE701083007 1
ELE701083006 1
ELE701083005 1
ELE701083004 1
ELE701083003 1
ELE701083002 1
ELE701083001 1
ELE702466003 1
ELE702466002 1
ELE702501003 1
ELE702501002 1
ELE702501001 1
ELE701082001 1
ELE701648001 1
ELE703608003 1
ELE703608002 1
ELE703608001 1
ELE704517002 0.5
ELE704517001 1
ELE704540003 1
ELE704540002 1
ELE704540001 1
ELE704957004 1
ELE704957003 1
ELE704957002 1
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Meter Reader
Meter Reader
Meter Reader
Instrument and Control Technician
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Government Relations Representative I/II
Instrument and Control Technician
Instrument and Control Technician
Energy Services Account Representative I/II
Energy Services Account Representative I/II
Generation Maintenance Scheduler‐Coordinator
Energy Program Technician
Energy Program Technician
Energy Services Account Representative I/II
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Substation Technician
Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician
Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician
Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician
Electric/Apprentice Metering System Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
Electric/Apprentice Line Technician
ELE704957001 1
ELE705596004 1
ELE705596003 1
ELE705596001 1
ELE705505001 1
ELE705600001 1
ELE705591002 1
ELE705591001 1
ELE705526003 1
ELE705526002 1
ELE705526001 1
ELE705530002 1
ELE705530001 1
ELE705523009 1
ELE705523008 1
ELE705523007 1
ELE705523006 1
ELE705523005 1
ELE705523004 1
ELE705523003 1
ELE705523002 1
ELE705523001 1
ELE705535001 1
ELE707128004 1
ELE707128003 1
ELE707128002 1
ELE707128001 1
ELE707118005 1
ELE707118004 1
ELE707118003 1
ELE707118002 1
ELE707118001 1
ELE707169001 1
ELE701036001 1
ELE707126003 1
ELE707126002 1
ELE707126001 1
ELE707168001 1
ELE701023001 1
ELE707163002 1
ELE707163001 1
ELE707161001 1
ELE707151002 1
ELE707151001 1
ELE705555001 1
ELE707152004 1
ELE707152003 1
ELE707152002 1
Senior Power Plant Operator Technician
Senior Power Plant Operator Technician
Senior Power Plant Operator Technician
Senior Power Engineer
Senior Power Engineer
Senior Power Plant Engineer
Senior Energy Services Account Representative
Senior Energy Services Account Representative
Senior GIS Analyst
Senior Electric Substation Technician
Senior Electric System Dispatcher
Senior Electric Technology Systems Analyst
Senior Electric Metering Systems Technician
Senior Electric Substation Technician
Senior Electric Substation Technician
Senior Electric Line Technician
Senior Electric Line Technician
Senior Electric Materials Technician
Senior Electric Line Technician
Senior Electric Line Technician
Senior Electric Line Technician
Senior Electric Business Analyst
Senior Electric Business Analyst
Senior Electric Business Analyst
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Supply and Portfolio Administrator
Senior Electric Business Analyst
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operations and Maintenance Supervisor
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Operator Technician I/II
Power Plant Mechanic
Power Plant Mechanic
Power Plant Operations and Maintenance Supervisor
Power Plant Engineer I/II
Power Plant Engineer I/II
Power Plant Mechanic
Power Engineer I/II
Power Engineering Manager
Power Generation Superintendent
Office Assistant I/II
Power Engineer I/II
Power Engineer I/II
ELE707152001 1
ELE701029002 1
ELE701029001 1
ELE701103001 1
ELE701044003 1
ELE701044002 1
ELE701044001 1
ELE703315005 1
ELE703315004 1
ELE703315003 1
ELE703315002 1
ELE703315001 1
ELE701104001 1
ELE70920001 1
ELE701041001 1
ELE701049015 1
ELE701049014 1
ELE701049013 1
ELE701049012 1
ELE701049011 0.75
ELE701049010 0.5
ELE701049009 1
ELE701049008 0.5
ELE701049007 1
ELE701049006 1
ELE701049005 1
ELE701049004 1
ELE701049001 1
ELE701046005 1
ELE701046004 1
ELE701046003 1
ELE701046002 1
ELE701046001 1
ELE701042001 1
ELE Electric Department 197.25*
*1 position will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Position Code Allocated FTE
EUD740071001 1
EUD741003001 1
EUD740084005 1
EUD740084004 1
EUD740084003 1
EUD740084002 1
EUD740084001 1
EUD740411003 1
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Assistant Environmental Utilities Director
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Supervisor
Position Title
Utility Customer Service Supervisor
Total for Department:

Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II
Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II
Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II
Utility Customer Service Specialist I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Customer Service Representative I/II
Utility Billing Customer Service Field Rep I/II
Utility Billing Operations Manager
Utility Billing and Field Services Supervisor
Utility Billing Analyst I/II
Utility Billing Analyst I/II
Utility Billing Analyst I/II
Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist
Utility Billing Analyst I/II
Utility Billing Analyst I/II
Senior Utility Billing Customer Service Field
Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist
Senior Utility Customer Service Specialist
Senior Power Plant Operator Technician
Senior Utility Billing Analyst
Senior Utility Billing Analyst
EUD740411001 1
EUD741005002 1
EUD741005001 1
EUD740820002 1
EUD740820001 1
EUD741548003 1
EUD741548001 1
EUD741645001 1
EUD749550001 1
EUD741277001 1
EUD741350002 1
EUD741350001 1
EUD742544002 1
EUD742544001 1
EUD742547004 1
EUD742547003 1
EUD742547002 1
EUD742547001 1
EUD742548002 1
EUD741684001 1
EUD741038006 1
EUD741038005 1
EUD741038004 1
EUD741038003 1
EUD741038002 1
EUD741038001 1
EUD741024001 1
EUD742541003 1
EUD742541002 1
EUD742541001 1
EUD743412003 1
EUD743412002 1
EUD743412001 1
EUD741648001 1
EUD743604001 1
EUD743610002 1
EUD743732002 1
EUD743732001 1
EUD744020005 1
EUD744020004 1
EUD744020003 1
EUD744020001 1
EUD740050001 1
EUD744517003 1
EUD744517002 1
EUD744520002 1
EUD744520001 1
EUD744957012 1
Materials Technician
Materials Technician
Office Assistant I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Laboratory Technician I/II
Laboratory Technician I/II
Laboratory Technician I/II
Interpretive Services Specialist I/II
Interpretive Services Specialist I/II
Laboratory Technician I/II
Government Relations Representative I/II
Industrial Waste Specialist
Industrial Waste Technician
GIS Analyst I/II
GIS Analyst I/II
GIS Analyst I/II
Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator
Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator
Environmental Utility Compliance Administrator
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Maintenance Superintendent
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Business Services Manager
Environmental Utilities Director
Environmental Utilities Instrument and Control
Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II
Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II
Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II
Environmental Compliance Specialist I/II
Environmental Compliance Specialist I/II
Environmental Utilities Business Analyst I/II
Engineering Manager
Engineering Technician I/II
Engineering Technician I/II
Data Management Specialist I/II
Department Public Information Officer
ERP Business Analyst I/II
Associate Engineer
Associate Engineer
Data Management Specialist I/II
Assistant Environmental Utilities Director
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
EUD744957011 1
EUD744957010 1
EUD744957009 1
EUD744957008 1
EUD744957006 1
EUD744957005 1
EUD744957004 1
EUD744957003 1
EUD744957002 1
EUD744957001 1
EUD741028001 1
EUD745319003 1
EUD745319002 1
EUD745319001 1
EUD745328006 1
EUD745328005 1
EUD745328004 1
EUD745328003 1
EUD745328002 1
EUD745328001 1
EUD745402001 1
EUD745533002 1
EUD745533001 1
EUD745519003 1
EUD745519002 1
EUD745519001 1
EUD745502005 1
EUD745502004 1
EUD745502003 1
EUD745502002 1
EUD745502001 1
EUD745514003 1
EUD745514002 1
EUD741004001 1
EUD746150001 1
EUD746226005 1
EUD746226004 1
EUD746226003 1
EUD746226002 1
EUD746226001 1
EUD746231001 1
EUD746235004 1
EUD746235003 1
EUD746235002 1
EUD746235001 1
EUD746304042 1
EUD746304040 1
EUD746304039 1
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Supervisor
Refuse Supervisor
Refuse Supervisor
Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II
Refuse Superintendent
Refuse Supervisor
Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II
Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II
Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II
Process Engineer
Recycling and Organics Coordinator
Refuse Maintenance Worker I/II
Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II
Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II
Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II
Preventative Maintenance Supervisor
Preventative Maintenance Supervisor
Preventative Maintenance Technician I/II
Preventative Maintenance Coordinator
Preventative Maintenance Coordinator
Preventative Maintenance Supervisor
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Predictive Maintenance Technician I/II
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II
Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II
Plant and Equipment Mechanic I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Organics Truck Driver
Plant and Equipment Maintenance Worker I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
EUD746304038 1
EUD746304037 1
EUD746304036 1
EUD746304035 1
EUD746304034 1
EUD746304033 1
EUD746304032 1
EUD746304031 1
EUD746304030 1
EUD746304029 1
EUD746304028 1
EUD746304027 1
EUD746304026 1
EUD746304025 1
EUD746304024 1
EUD746304023 1
EUD746304022 1
EUD746304021 1
EUD746304020 1
EUD746304019 1
EUD746304018 1
EUD746304017 1
EUD746304016 1
EUD746304015 1
EUD746304014 1
EUD746304013 1
EUD746304012 1
EUD746304011 1
EUD746304010 1
EUD746304009 1
EUD746304008 1
EUD746304007 1
EUD746304006 1
EUD746304005 1
EUD746304004 1
EUD746304003 1
EUD746304002 1
EUD746304001 1
EUD746244001 1
EUD747020002 1
EUD747020001 1
EUD746500002 1
EUD746500001 1
EUD747142004 1
EUD747142003 1
EUD747142002 1
EUD747142001 1
EUD741065001 1
Senior Engineer
Senior Environmental Utilities Business Analyst
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
SCADA System Technician
Safety Coordinator
Safety Coordinator
SCADA System Technician
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse and Stormwater Manager
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
Refuse Truck Driver I/II
EUD741123001 1
EUD747161001 1
EUD743733001 1
EUD747284003 1
EUD747284002 1
EUD747284001 1
EUD747129007 1
EUD747129006 1
EUD747129005 1
EUD747129004 1
EUD747129003 1
EUD747129002 1
EUD747129001 1
EUD749559001 1
EUD741279001 1
EUD747202006 1
EUD747202004 1
EUD747202003 1
EUD747202002 1
EUD747202001 1
EUD747202005 1
EUD747204008 1
EUD747204007 1
EUD747204006 1
EUD747204005 1
EUD747204004 1
EUD747204003 1
EUD747204002 1
EUD747204001 1
EUD747324001 1
EUD741102001 1
EUD741646001 1
EUD741099002 1
EUD741099001 1
EUD748978002 1
EUD748980001 1
EUD748978003 1
EUD748978001 1
EUD749040001 1
EUD749025009 1
EUD749025008 1
EUD749025006 1
EUD749025005 1
EUD749025004 1
EUD749025003 1
EUD749025002 1
EUD749025001 1
EUD749025010 1
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wastewater Collection Supervisor
Wastewater Treatment Plant Chief Operator
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 8Hr
Wasterwater Collection Supervisor
Wastewater Collection Superintendent
Wastewater Collection Supervisor
Utility Government Relations Administrator
Waste Services Clerk I/II
Waste Services Clerk I/II
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Solid Waste Billing Technician
Utility Exploration Center Supervisor
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior Water Distribution Worker
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior SCADA System Technician
Senior Solid Waste Billing Technician
Senior Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician
Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician
Senior Refuse Truck Driver
Senior GIS Analyst
Senior Interpretive Services Specialist
Senior Preventative Maintenance Technician
Senior Environmental Utilities Instrument & Control
EUD749025007 1
EUD749020004 1
EUD749020003 1
EUD749020002 1
EUD749020001 1
EUD749030002 1
EUD749030001 1
EUD749029026 1
EUD749029025 1
EUD749029024 1
EUD749029022 1
EUD749029021 1
EUD749029020 1
EUD749029019 1
EUD749029018 1
EUD749029017 1
EUD749029016 1
EUD749029015 1
EUD749029014 1
EUD749029013 1
EUD749029012 1
EUD749029011 1
EUD749029010 1
EUD749029009 1
EUD749029008 1
EUD749029007 1
EUD749029006 1
EUD749029005 1
EUD749029004 1
EUD749029003 1
EUD749029002 1
EUD749029001 1
EUD749029023 1
EUD749045001 1
EUD749047001 1
EUD749078001 1
EUD749051005 1
EUD749051004 1
EUD749051003 1
EUD749051002 1
EUD749051001 1
EUD749085001 1
EUD749084004 1
EUD749084003 1
EUD749084002 1
EUD749084001 1
EUD749248024 1
EUD749248023 1
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Conservation Worker I/II
Water Distribution Superintendent
Water Distribution Supervisor
Water Conservation Worker I/II
Water Conservation Worker I/II
Water Conservation Worker I/II
Water Conservation Administrator
Water Conservation Specialist
Water Conservation Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Manager
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Utility Maintenance Worker I/II
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade IV
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade IV
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Grade III 24Hr
EUD749248022 1
EUD749248021 1
EUD749248020 1
EUD749248019 1
EUD749248018 1
EUD749248017 1
EUD749248016 1
EUD749248015 1
EUD749248014 1
EUD749248013 1
EUD749248012 1
EUD749248011 1
EUD749248010 1
EUD749248009 1
EUD749248008 1
EUD749248007 1
EUD749248006 1
EUD749248005 1
EUD749248004 1
EUD749248003 1
EUD749248002 1
EUD749248001 1
EUD749101001 1
EUD749101002 1
EUD741053001 1
EUD749175001 1
EUD749230006 1
EUD749230005 1
EUD749230004 1
EUD749230003 1
EUD749230002 1
EUD749230001 1
EUD749244001 1
EUD Environmental Utilities
Department
281*
*1 position will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Utility Manager
Total for Department:

Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Treatment Plant Chief Operator
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Treatment Plant Operator Grade I/II/III 24Hr
Water Quality Lab Supervisor
Water Quality Lab Supervisor
Water Quality Technician
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Water Distribution Worker I/II
Position Code Allocated FTE
FIN240040003 1
FIN240040002 1
FIN240040001 1
FIN241370001 1
FIN240043001 1
FIN249427001 1
FIN240084001 1
FIN241021001 1
FIN2421026001 1
FIN240915004 1
FIN240915003 1
FIN240915002 1
FIN240915001 1
FIN240930001 1
FIN241060004 1
FIN241060003 1
FIN241060002 1
FIN241060001 1
FIN249550004 1
FIN249550003 1
FIN249550002 1
FIN249550001 1
FIN246520001 1
FIN242900001 1
FIN243326007 1
FIN243326006 1
FIN243326005 1
FIN243326004 1
FIN243326003 1
FIN243326002 1
FIN243326001 1
FIN240050001 1
FIN244457001 1
FIN241124002 1
FIN241124001 1
FIN249428001 1
FIN245101004 0.6
FIN245101003 1
FIN245101002 1
FIN245101001 1
FIN245652001 1
FIN241051004 1
FIN241051003 1
FIN241051002 1
FIN241051001 Senior Accountant 1
Senior Accountant
Senior Accountant
Senior Accountant
Payroll Technician I/II
Payroll Technician I/II
Purchasing and Warehouse Manager
Payroll Supervisor
Payroll Technician I/II
Payroll Technician I/II
Management Assistant I/II
Payroll Analyst I/II
Payroll Analyst I/II
Finance Technician I/II
Finance Technician I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Finance Technician I/II
Finance Technician I/II
Finance Technician I/II
Finance Manager
Finance Technician I/II
Finance Technician I/II
ERP Business Analyst I/II
ERP Business Analyst I/II
ERP Program Manager
Buyer I/II
ERP Business Analyst I/II
ERP Business Analyst I/II
Buyer I/II
Buyer I/II
Buyer I/II
Budget Analyst I/II
Budget Analyst I/II
Budget Manager
Assistant Finance Director
Budget Analyst I/II
Budget Analyst I/II
Accounts Payable Supervisor
Administrative Technician
Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer
Accountant I/II
Accounting Manager
Accounting Supervisor
Accountant I/II
Accountant I/II
Position Title
FIN247139001 1
FIN247141002 1
FIN247141001 1
FIN247203001 1
FIN248952002 1
FIN248952001 1
FIN Finance Department 50.6
Position Code Allocated FTE
FIR480071001 1
FIR480084001 1
FIR480480001 1
FIR481645001 1
FIR482415001 1
FIR480905007 1
FIR480905006 1
FIR480905004 1
FIR480905003 1
FIR480905002 1
FIR480905001 1
FIR480905005 1
FIR483320034 1
FIR483320033 1
FIR483320032 1
FIR483320030 1
FIR483320029 1
FIR483320028 1
FIR483320027 1
FIR483320026 1
FIR483320025 1
FIR483320024 1
FIR483320023 1
FIR483320022 1
FIR483320021 1
FIR483320020 1
FIR483320019 1
FIR483320018 1
FIR483320017 1
FIR483320016 1
FIR483320015 1
FIR483320014 1
FIR483320013 1
FIR483320012 1
FIR483320011 1
FIR483320010 Fire Captain 1
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Assistant Fire Chief
Department Public Information Officer
EMS Quality Assurance Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Technician
Position Title
Warehouse Worker I/II
Total for Department:

Senior Payroll Technician
Senior Warehouse Worker
Warehouse Worker I/II
Senior Buyer
Senior Payroll Technician
FIR483320009 1
FIR483320008 1
FIR483320007 1
FIR483320006 1
FIR483320005 1
FIR483320004 1
FIR483320003 1
FIR483320002 1
FIR483320001 1
FIR483320031 1
FIR483330001 1
FIR483332002 1
FIR483332001 1
FIR483340033 1
FIR483340032 1
FIR483340031 1
FIR483340030 1
FIR483340029 1
FIR483340028 1
FIR483340027 1
FIR483340026 1
FIR483340025 1
FIR483340024 1
FIR483340023 1
FIR483340022 1
FIR483340021 1
FIR483340020 1
FIR483340019 1
FIR483340018 1
FIR483340017 1
FIR483340016 1
FIR483340015 1
FIR483340014 1
FIR483340013 1
FIR483340012 1
FIR483340011 1
FIR483340010 1
FIR483340009 1
FIR483340008 1
FIR483340007 1
FIR483340006 1
FIR483340005 1
FIR483340004 1
FIR483340003 1
FIR483340002 1
FIR483340001 1
FIR481022001 1
FIR483377005 Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II 1 Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire and Environmental Inspection Supervisor
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Engineer
Fire Division Chief
Fire Division Chief
Fire Engineer
Fire Captain
Fire Captain (8 Hr)
Fire Chief
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
FIR483377004 1
FIR483377003 1
FIR483377002 1
FIR483377001 1
FIR483355039 1
FIR483355038 1
FIR483355037 1
FIR483355036 1
FIR483355035 1
FIR483355034 1
FIR483355033 1
FIR483355032 1
FIR483355031 1
FIR483355030 1
FIR483355029 1
FIR483355028 1
FIR483355027 1
FIR483355026 1
FIR483355025 1
FIR483355024 1
FIR483355023 1
FIR483355022 1
FIR483355021 1
FIR483355020 1
FIR483355019 1
FIR483355018 1
FIR483355017 1
FIR483355016 1
FIR483355015 1
FIR483355014 1
FIR483355013 1
FIR483355012 1
FIR483355011 1
FIR483355010 1
FIR483355009 1
FIR483355008 1
FIR483355007 1
FIR483355006 1
FIR483355005 1
FIR483355004 1
FIR483355003 1
FIR483355002 1
FIR483355001 1
FIR483412001 1
FIR480050001 1
FIR484957001 1
FIR Fire Department 130
Management Analyst I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Total for Department:

Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
GIS Analyst I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II
Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II
Firefighter Paramedic I/II
Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II
Fire and Environmental Safety Inspector I/II
Position Code Allocated FTE
HRD280071001 1
HRD280484001 1
HRD283596004 1
HRD283596003 1
HRD283596002 1
HRD283596001 1
HRD283598001 1
HRD283599001 1
HRD285235008 1
HRD285235007 1
HRD285235006 1
HRD285235005 1
HRD285235004 1
HRD285235003 1
HRD285235002 1
HRD285235001 1
HRD286450001 1
HRD287178002 1
HRD287178001 1
HRD Human Resources Department 19
Senior Human Resources Technician
Senior Human Resources Technician
Total for Department:

Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Risk Manager
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Analyst I/II
Human Resources Director
Human Resources Manager
Human Resources Analyst I/II
Human Resources Analyst I/II
Human Resources Analyst I/II
Administrative Assistant
Assistant Human Resources Director
Position Title
Position Code Allocated FTE
ITD320084001 1
ITD329558002 1
ITD329558001 1
ITD321362013 1
ITD321362012 1
ITD321362011 1
ITD321362010 1
ITD321362009 1
ITD321362008 1
ITD321362007 1
ITD321362005 1
ITD321362004 1
ITD321362003 1
ITD321362002 1
ITD321362001 1
ITD321180001 1
ITD321552007 1
ITD321552006 1
ITD321552004 1
ITD321552002 1
ITD321552001 1
ITD323625001 1
ITD323794013 1
ITD323794012 1
ITD323794010 1
ITD323794009 1
ITD323794007 1
ITD323794006 1
ITD323794002 1
ITD323794001 1
ITD329542001 1
ITD323602005 1
ITD323602004 1
ITD323602003 1
ITD323602002 1
ITD323602001 1
ITD323618004 1
ITD323618003 1
ITD323618002 1
ITD323618001 1
ITD320050001 1
ITD321089003 1
ITD321089002 1
ITD321089001 1
ITD321090001 Security Architect 1
Security Analyst I/II
Security Analyst I/II
Security Analyst I/II
Information Technology Technician I/II
Information Technology Technician I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Information Technology Program Manager
Information Technology Technician I/II
Information Technology Technician I/II
Information Technology Program Manager
Information Technology Program Manager
Information Technology Program Manager
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Client Services Supervisor
Information Technology Program Manager
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Database Analyst I/II
Information Security Administrator
Information Technology Analyst I/II
Database Analyst I/II
Database Analyst I/II
Database Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Chief Information Officer
Database Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Assistant Information Technology Director
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Business Systems Analyst I/II
Administrative Technician
Assistant Information Technology Director
Position Title
ITD327130003 1
ITD327130002 1
ITD327130001 1
ITD327145001 1
ITD327194001 1
ITD327149003 1
ITD321091008 1
ITD321091007 1
ITD321091006 1
ITD321091005 1
ITD321091004 1
ITD321091003 1
ITD321091002 1
ITD321091001 1
ITD Information Technology
Department
59*
*3 positions will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Position Code Allocated FTE
PAC181645002 1
PAC181645001 1
PAC181659001 1
PAC181109001 1
CMO143451001 1
PAC184517003 1
PAC184517002 1
PAC184517001 1
PAC181108001 1
PAC188426001 1
PAC Public Affairs and Communications 10
Position Code Allocated FTE
POL440071001 1
POL440100003 1
POL440100002 1
POL440100001 1
POL440110001 1
POL441430004 1
POL441430003 1
POL441430002 1
POL441430001 1
POL441380011 1
POL441380010 1
Communications Supervisor
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Communications Supervisor
Communications Supervisor
Communications Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Animal Control Officer
Animal Control Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
Animal Control Officer
Position Title
Video and Multimedia Technician
Total for Department:

Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Public Affairs and Communication Manager
Digital Content Analyst
Government Relations Administrator
Marketing & Communications Analyst I/II
Department Public Information Officer
Department Public Information Officer
Deputy City Manager
Position Title
Total for Department:

Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Senior Information Technology Technician
Systems Architect
Systems Architect
Senior Business Systems Analyst
Senior Database Analyst
Senior Information Technology Analyst
Senior Business Systems Analyst
Senior Business Systems Analyst
POL441380009
1 POL4413800081
POL4413800071
POL4413800061
POL4413800051
POL4413800041
POL4413800031
POL4413800021
POL4413800011
POL4414750021
POL4414750011
POL4417000211
POL4417000201
POL4417000191
POL4417000181
POL4417000171
POL4417000161
POL4417000151
POL4417000141
POL4417000131
POL4417000121
POL4417000111
POL4417000101
POL4417000091
POL4417000081
POL4417000071
POL4417000061
POL4417000051
POL4417000041
POL4417000031
POL4417000021
POL4417000011
POL4400500011
POL4454000031
POL4454000021
POL4454000011
POL4454100011
POL4454200081
POL4454200071
POL4454200061
POL4454200051
POL4454200041
POL4454200031
POL4454200021
POL4454200011
POL4454301251
POL4454301241
POL4454301231
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Chief
Police Lieutenant
Police Lieutenant
Police Captain
Police Captain
Police Captain
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Dispatcher I/II
Crime Analyst
Crime Analyst
Dispatcher I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
Community Services Officer I/II
POL445430122
1 POL4454301211
POL4454301201
POL4454301191
POL4454301181
POL4454301171
POL4454301161
POL4454301151
POL4454301141
POL4454301131
POL4454301121
POL4454301111
POL4454301101
POL4454301091
POL4454301081
POL4454301071
POL4454301061
POL4454301051
POL4454301041
POL4454301031
POL4454301021
POL4454301011
POL4454301001
POL4454300991
POL4454300981
POL4454300971
POL4454300961
POL4454300951
POL4454300941
POL4454300931
POL4454300921
POL4454300911
POL4454300901
POL4454300891
POL4454300881
POL4454300871
POL4454300861
POL4454300851
POL4454300841
POL4454300831
POL4454300821
POL4454300811
POL4454300801
POL4454300791
POL4454300781
POL4454300771
POL4454300761
POL4454300751
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
POL445430074
1 POL4454300731
POL4454300721
POL4454300711
POL4454300701
POL4454300691
POL4454300681
POL4454300671
POL4454300661
POL4454300651
POL4454300641
POL4454300631
POL4454300621
POL4454300611
POL4454300601
POL4454300591
POL4454300581
POL4454300571
POL4454300561
POL4454300551
POL4454300541
POL4454300531
POL4454300521
POL4454300511
POL4454300501
POL4454300491
POL4454300481
POL4454300471
POL4454300461
POL4454300451
POL4454300441
POL4454300431
POL4454300421
POL4454300411
POL4454300401
POL4454300391
POL4454300381
POL4454300371
POL4454300361
POL4454300351
POL4454300341
POL4454300331
POL4454300321
POL4454300311
POL4454300301
POL4454300291
POL4454300281
POL4454300271
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
POL445430026
1 POL4454300251
POL4454300241
POL4454300231
POL4454300221
POL4454300211
POL4454300201
POL4454300191
POL4454300181
POL4454300171
POL4454300161
POL4454300151
POL4454300141
POL4454300121
POL4454300111
POL4454300101
POL4454300091
POL4454300081
POL4454300071
POL4454300061
POL4454300051
POL4454300041
POL4454300031
POL4454300021
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Officer/Police Trainee
POL445430001 1
POL445429001 1
POL441094004 1
POL441094003 1
POL441094002 1
POL441094001 1
POL445440010 1
POL445440009 1
POL445440008 1
POL445440007 1
POL445440005 1
POL445440004 1
POL445440003 1
POL445440002 1
POL445440001 1
POL445494004 1
POL445494003 1
POL445494002 1
POL445494001 1
POL445470017 1
POL445470016 1
POL445470015 1
POL445470014 1
POL445470013 1
POL445470012 1
POL445470011 1
POL445470010 1
POL445470009 1
POL445470008 1
POL445470007 1
POL445470006 1
POL445470005 1
POL445470004 1
POL445470003 1
POL445470002 1
POL445470001 1
POL445489002 1
POL445489001 1
POL441039001 1
POL441126001 1
POL445657001 1
POL445748002 1
POL445748001 1
POL441092002 1
POL441092001 1
Total for Department: POL Police Department 224
Records Supervisor
Senior Police Records Clerk
Senior Police Records Clerk
Police Social Services Supervisor
Public Safety Program Coordinator
Records Supervisor
Police Services Administrator
Police Services Administrator
Police Social Services Practitioner
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Scene Technician I/II
Police Sergeant
Police Sergeant
Police Scene Technician I/II
Police Scene Technician I/II
Police Scene Technician I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Records Clerk I/II
Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II
Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II
Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II
Police Officer/Police Trainee
Police Property and Evidence Supervisor
Police Property and Evidence Technician I/II
Position Code Allocated FTE
PRL580071001 1
PRL580084008 1
PRL580084007 1
PRL580084006 1
PRL580084005 1
PRL580084004 1
PRL580084003 1
PRL580084002 1
PRL580084001 1
PRL588302001 1
PRL588300001 1
PRL581225014 1
PRL581225013 1
PRL581225012 1
PRL581225011 1
PRL581225010 1
PRL581225009 1
PRL581225008 1
PRL581225007 1
PRL581225006 1
PRL581225005 1
PRL581225004 1
PRL581225003 1
PRL581225002 1
PRL581225001 1
PRL583740001 1
PRL581645002 1
PRL581101001 0.75
PRL585075002 1
PRL584152007 0.5
PRL584152005 1
PRL584152004 1
PRL584152003 1
PRL584152002 1
PRL584152001 1
PRL584210005 1
PRL584210003 1
PRL584210002 1
PRL584210001 1
PRL584250003 1
PRL584250002 1
PRL584250001 1
PRL580050003 1
PRL580050002 1
PRL580050001 1
Management Analyst I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Library Technician
Library Technician
Library Technician
Library Assistant I/II
Library Assistant I/II
Library Assistant I/II
Librarian I/II
Librarian I/II
Library Assistant I/II
Librarian I/II
Librarian I/II
Librarian I/II
Graphic Designer
Irrigation Technician
Librarian I/II
Child Care Site Coordinator
Cultural Arts Supervisor
Department Public Information Officer
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Child Care Site Coordinator
Aquatics Maintenance Technician
Arborist Technician
Child Care Site Coordinator
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Position Title
PRL584517001 1
PRL581121001 1
PRL589545001 1
PRL584872003 1
PRL584872002 1
PRL584872001 1
PRL584872006 1
PRL584872005 1
PRL584872004 1
PRL584957009 1
PRL584957006 1
PRL584957003 1
PRL584957002 1
PRL585022002 1
PRL585022001 1
PRL581106001 1
PRL585080026 1
PRL585080025 1
PRL585080024 1
PRL585080023 1
PRL585080022 1
PRL585080021 1
PRL585080020 1
PRL585080019 1
PRL585080018 1
PRL585080017 1
PRL585080016 1
PRL585080015 1
PRL585080014 1
PRL585080013 1
PRL585080012 1
PRL585080011 1
PRL585080010 1
PRL585080009 1
PRL585080008 1
PRL585080007 1
PRL585080006 1
PRL585080004 1
PRL585080003 1
PRL585080002 1
PRL585080001 1
PRL581278006 1
PRL581278005 1
PRL581278004 1
PRL581278003 1
PRL581278002 1
PRL581278001 1
PRL589543011 1
Parks Project Technician
Parks Project Technician
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Project Technician
Parks Project Technician
Parks Project Technician
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Project Technician
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Park Planning and Development Manager
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Park Development Project Manager I/II
Park Development Project Manager I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Natural Resources Worker I/II
Natural Resources Worker I/II
Natural Resources Worker I/II
Natural Resources Worker  I/II
Natural Resources Worker  I/II
Natural Resources Worker  I/II
Marketing and Communication Analyst I/II
Museum Assistant
Natural Resources Specialist I/II
PRL589543010 1
PRL589543009 1
PRL589543007 1
PRL589543006 1
PRL589543004 1
PRL589543003 1
PRL589543002 1
PRL589543001 1
PRL589543008 1
PRL585082001 1
PRL589547004 1
PRL589547003 1
PRL589547002 1
PRL589547001 1
PRL589546005 1
PRL589546004 1
PRL589546003 1
PRL589546002 1
PRL589546001 1
PRL585069004 1
PRL585069003 1
PRL585069002 1
PRL585069001 1
PRL588304005 1
PRL588304004 1
PRL588304003 1
PRL588304002 1
PRL588304001 1
PRL589544009 1
PRL589544008 1
PRL589544007 1
PRL589544006 1
PRL589544005 1
PRL589544004 1
PRL589544003 1
PRL589544002 1
PRL589544001 1
PRL583733001 1
PRL587154001 1
PRL581119001 1
PRL587192006 1
PRL587192005 1
PRL587192004 1
PRL587192003 1
PRL587192002 1
PRL587201001 1
PRL581504002 1
PRL581504001 1
Senior Tree Trimmer
Tree Trimmer I/II
Tree Trimmer I/II
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
Senior Park Development Project Manager
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
Senior Parks Maintenance Worker
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Senior Interpretive Services Specialist
Senior Natural Resources Worker
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation Leader
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation and Library Supervisor
Recreation Leader
Recreation Leader
Recreation Leader
Parks Supervisor
Parks Supervisor
Recreation Leader
Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent
Parks Supervisor
Parks Supervisor
Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent
Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent
Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent
Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager
Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager
Parks Recreation and Libraries Superintendent
Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager
Parks Recreation and Libraries Manager
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
Parks Recreation and Libraries Coordinator I/II
PRL581107001 1
PRL588762001 1
PRL581641004 1
PRL581641003 1
PRL581641001 1
PRL Parks Recreation and Libraries 145.25
Position Code Allocated FTE
PWD620088001 1
PWD620071001 1
PWD620084006 0.75
PWD620084005 1
PWD620084003 1
PWD620084002 1
PWD620084001 1
PWD620090001 1
PWD621005012 1
PWD621005011 1
PWD621005010 1
PWD621005009 1
PWD621005008 1
PWD621005007 1
PWD621005006 1
PWD621005005 1
PWD621005004 1
PWD621005003 1
PWD621005002 1
PWD621005001 1
PWD620088003 1
PWD621032006 1
PWD621032005 1
PWD621032004 1
PWD621032003 1
PWD621032002 1
PWD621032001 1
PWD621401001 1
PWD621485005 1
PWD621485004 1
PWD621485003 1
PWD621485002 1
PWD621485001 1
PWD621025001 1
PWD622385005 1
PWD622385004 1
PWD622385003 1
Electronics Technician I/II/III
Electronics Technician I/II/III
Custodian
Custodian Supervisor
Electronics Technician I/II/III
Custodian
Custodian
Custodian
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Community Relations Analyst
Custodian
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Associate/Assistant Transportation Planner
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Building Maintenance Worker I/II
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Associate (PE)/Assistant/Junior Engineer
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Alternative Transportation Manager
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Administrative Technician
Associate/Assistant Transportation Planner
Administrative Assistant
Position Title
Youth Development Program Coordinator
Youth Development Program Coordinator
Total for Department:

Turf and Sports Field Technician
Urban Forester
Youth Development Program Coordinator
PWD622385002 1
PWD622385001 1
PWD621277001 1
PWD621350001 1
PWD622560004 1
PWD622560003 1
PWD622560002 1
PWD622560001 1
PWD624321001 1
PWD623319001 1
PWD621113001 1
PWD622565001 1
PWD622214001 1
PWD620050002 1
PWD620050001 1
PWD624501010 1
PWD624501009 1
PWD624501008 1
PWD624501007 1
PWD624501006 1
PWD624501005 1
PWD624501004 1
PWD624501003 1
PWD624501002 1
PWD624501001 1
PWD624957008 1
PWD624957007 0.5
PWD624957006 1
PWD624957005 1
PWD624957004 1
PWD624957003 1
PWD624957002 1
PWD624957001 1
PWD625519001 1
PWD625560003 1
PWD625560002 1
PWD625560001 1
PWD621069001 1
PWD625635001 1
PWD621087002 1
PWD621087001 1
PWD627119001 1
PWD627144001 1
PWD627170001 1
PWD627142003 1
PWD627142002 1
PWD627142001 1
PWD627189002 1
Senior Engineer
Senior Mechanic
Senior Electronic Technician
Senior Engineer
Senior Engineer
Public Works Manager
Senior Building Maintenance Worker
Senior Custodian
Project Supervisor
Public Works Director
Public Works Manager
Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Preventative Maintenance Supervisor
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Office Assistant I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Mechanic I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Management Analyst I/II
Mechanic I/II
Fleet Services Parts Buyer
Fleet Services Supervisor
GIS Technician I/II
Equipment Serviceworker
Facilities Supervisor
Fleet Management Technician
Equipment Serviceworker
Equipment Serviceworker
Equipment Serviceworker
Electronics Technician I/II/III
Engineering Manager
Engineering Technician I/II
Electronics Technician I/II/III
PWD627189001 1
PWD627187006 1
PWD627187005 1
PWD627187004 1
PWD627187003 1
PWD627187002 1
PWD627187001 1
PWD621073001 1
PWD627522003 1
PWD627522002 1
PWD627522001 1
PWD627530020 1
PWD627530019 1
PWD627530018 1
PWD627530017 1
PWD627530016 1
PWD627530015 1
PWD627530014 1
PWD627530013 1
PWD627530012 1
PWD627530011 1
PWD627530010 1
PWD627530009 1
PWD627530008 1
PWD627530007 1
PWD627530006 1
PWD627530005 1
PWD627530004 1
PWD627530003 1
PWD627530002 1
PWD627530001 1
PWD627540005 1
PWD627540004 1
PWD627540003 1
PWD627540002 1
PWD627540001 1
PWD622376002 1
PWD622376001 1
Street Sweeper Operator
Traffic Signal Maintenance Worker I/II
Traffic Signal Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Sweeper Operator
Street Sweeper Operator
Street Sweeper Operator
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Sweeper Operator
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Worker I/II
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Street Maintenance Manager
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Senior Mechanic
PWD621110001 1
PWD621052001 1
PWD621111001 1
PWD628940001 1
PWD628952001 1
PWD Public Works 127.25
Total for All Departments Allocated FTE
1365.35*
* 6 positions will be eliminated after promotion process has been completed Vehicle Maintenance Servicewriter
Warehouse Worker I/II
Total for Department:

Transit Operations Supervisor
Transportation Grants Analyst
Transportation Technician I/II

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2882
File #: 0216-02
Title:

Second Reading- Roseville Municipal Code Amendment to Employees Annual Charitable Hearts Fund
Contact: Tobi Thomas 916-746-1368 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.23.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 6704 AMENDING SECTION 4.07.030 OF CHAPTER 4.07 OF TITLE 4

OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING EMPLOYEES ANNUAL CHARITABLE HEARTS FUND, for second reading and adoption.

BACKGROUND
Not Applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not Applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Tobi Thomas, Management Analyst
Dion Louthan, Assistant City Manager
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Ordinance 6704
ORDINANCE NO. 6704

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING SECTION

4.07.030 OF CHAPTER 4.07 OF TITLE 4 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

REGARDING EMPLOYEES ANNUAL CHARITABLE HEARTS FUND
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 4.07 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 4.07 ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES ANNUAL CHARITABLE HEARTS FUND SECTION 2. Section 4.07.010 of Chapter 4.07 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

4.07.010 Roseville employees annual charitable hearts fund established.

There is hereby established the Roseville employees annual charitable hearts fund.

SECTION 3. Section 4.07.030 of Chapter 4.07 of Title 4 of the Roseville Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

4.07.030 Expenditures of money.

The city council shall, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville grants advisory commission, annually appropriate 100 percent of the interest and principal of the Roseville employees annual charitable hearts fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for youth, seniors, and families in the City of Roseville. Private donors may specify that their donations be appropriated for purposes other than those listed in this section and the city council will attempt to honor those requests. In the event the city council cannot honor specific requests, donations will be appropriated for the purpose of improving the quality of life for youth, seniors, and families in the City of Roseville.

SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date of adoption.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause this ordinance to be published in full at least once within fourteen (14) days after it is adopted in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, or shall within fourteen (14) days after its adoption cause this ordinance to be posted in full in at least three (3) public places in the City and enter in the Ordinance Book a certificate stating the time and place of said publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of _______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
2 AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2867
File #: 0600-02
Title: Out-of-Country Travel - Factory Automation Testing of Ultraviolet Disinfection System Contact: Jeremy Snyder 916-413-9236 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.24.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an out-of-country travel request for two Environmental Utilities Department maintenance personnel to attend factory automation testing at the ultraviolet disinfection equipment manufacturer, Trojan Technologies, in London, Ontario, Canada. This travel is in preparation for the construction of the City’s Ultraviolet Disinfection System Addition Project at the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant.

BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Department (EUD) released Request for Proposals No. 08-110 for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Ultraviolet Disinfection Addition Construction Project. The City also issued a Purchase Order in the amount of $2,072,000 to pre-purchase the Trojan equipment which will be supplied to the contractor to complete the construction of this project. The factory automation testing is necessary to test operation and functionality of the equipment and the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) software program operation, and to complete database points testing for supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) integration. The City staff will be at the manufacturing site to observe the testing and verify that the equipment manufactured meets the City’s specified requirements.

The efficiency of performing this testing at the factory allows for all of the manufacturer’s resources to be available to make corrections, as needed, during testing and final inspections prior to shipping to Roseville. This factory automation testing is an essential step that must be observed and verified by the City to ensure the project is kept on schedule and within the established budget.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost for travel and lodging for staff to witness this testing is estimated to be $8,250. There are sufficient funds in the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Ultraviolet Disinfection System Addition Project budget, which is funded by the South Placer Wastewater Authority.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed out-of-country travel meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Snyder, Preventative Maintenance Supervisor
Richard D. Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2868
File #: 0600-02
Title:

Out-of-Country Travel - Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce Annual Study Mission Delegation
Contact: Wayne Wiley 916-774-5286 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.25.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an out-of-country travel request for one Economic Development Department staff member to attend the Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce Study Mission in Toronto Canada.

BACKGROUND
For the past 22 years, the Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce (Metro Chamber) has organized an annual Study Mission to a destination in North America to learn best practices, inspire new ideas and provide meaningful collaboration that further local strategic initiatives. As a member of the Metro Chamber, City of Roseville staff, along with leaders from surrounding jurisdictions, have been invited to participate in this year’s Study Mission to gain insights from a cross-section of Toronto’s leaders through dozens of presentations, conversations, cultural experiences, and guided tours. This year’s Mission will focus on Toronto’s successful approach to strengthening community through economic growth and community development with a focus on culture, people, and place. A particular emphasis will be placed on the reinvestment and strategic planning of commercial corridors, inclusive economic development, entrepreneurship, and arts and culture (see Attachment 1).

Centered around community vibrancy and enhancing economic vitality, the 2023 study mission’s focus aligns with the City’s current initiatives and Council priorities. Participation in this year’s delegation will enable staff to gain an understanding of Toronto’s innovations, successful outcomes, and unique partnerships that can assist the City’s in its efforts to generate enhanced economic benefits, cultural identity and increase civic engagement. As the City continues to consider opportunities and strategies that stimulate and support investment in our Downtown and along our commercial corridor plan areas, the study mission also offers a unique opportunity to engage with stakeholders and establish partnerships (i.e. businesses, community organizations, and partner agencies), while learning from best practices and assessing practical applications.

FISCAL IMPACT
Costs related to travel, airfare, lodging and per diem is estimated to be $4,400. Funds are available in the Economic Development Department FY2023-24 budget in the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of out-of-country travel meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Respectfully Submitted,
Wayne Wiley, Economic Development Manager
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Develpoment Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Study Mission Flyer
“Sacramento grows more vibrant and
economically competitive every year.

Our business and community leaders drive
strong inclusive economic development, in
part, by gathering great ideas from around
the world and adapting them to our local
needs. This year’s program will continue
that history as the Metro Chamber’s Study
Mission will take members to Toronto,
Canada on an extraordinary discovery
effort. We will experience and learn from
Toronto’s unique approach to strengthening
community through the integration of
economic growth, community development,
health and culture. This is a Study Mission
that should not be missed.”
Chet Hewitt
Sierra Health Foundation
2023 Study Mission Chair
toronto
stats #
2,731,571

POPULATION

5.5Billion

VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDING
$85,000

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
1,484,600
JOBS
Follow along with
Study Mission!
#STUDYMISSION23
From the 2023 Study Mission Chair
Presented by Sierra Health Foundation
Please note that Study Mission is a member preferred
program. For membership information, please contact
us 916-552-6800 or [email protected]
study mission overview
The Sacramento Metro Chamber organizes an annual Study
Mission to a destination in North
America to learn best practices,
expand thinking, inspire new
ideas and provoke meaningful
collaboration. Annually, the program
enables local leaders to align
around a common vision, strengthen
relations, and collaborate on building
a more vibrant community at home.

The delegation representing civic,
business and elected leadership will
glean insights from a cross section
of Toronto’s leaders through dozens
of presentations, conversations,
cultural experiences, and guided
tours. The goal is for Sacramento’s
delegation to gain understanding
of Toronto’s
innovations,
successful outcomes,
unique partnerships,
lessons learned and leading
economic, cultural, and civic
approaches.

What makes Toronto one of the
best cities in the world to live?
According to the Global Livability
Index, it’s Toronto’s extraordinarily
multicultural population that makes
it shine. Forbes’ 2022 list of best
international cities applauded
Toronto for its infrastructure,
education, access to culture, sports
and green space. Toronto was also
recognized in
2023 as one of
the best cities for
students.

This year’s program
focuses on how Toronto embraced
inclusion, culture, people and place.

As a city that celebrates these
values to create a potent, cultured
and welcoming atmosphere, the
program will feature topics of
specific interest to Sacramento’s
pursuit of vibrant neighborhoods,
civic amenities, waterfront and
greenspace activation, quality of
life, and mixed use/reuse of historic
centers and corridors.

Register at metrochamber.org/studymission23
“People go
great distances
for great
experiences.”
Scott Beck
CEO, Destination Toronto
Greater Sacramento Toronto
2,578,590 2,731,571 Population
$80,216 $85,000 Median
Household
Income
$160.42
Million
$442.18
Billion
Gross
Domestic
Product
1,255,390 Jobs 1,484,600

4.5% Unemployment Rate 5.7%
$1.6
Billion
$5.5
Billion
Venture
Capital Funding
34 Minutes

25.4 Minutes
Average Commute Time

73.7% Drive Alone 41%

11.1% Carpool 17%

3.7% Public Transit 37%
Dollar Amount = USD
Dollar Amount = USD
Dollar Amount = USD
Dollar Amount = CAD
Dollar Amount = CAD
Dollar Amount = CAD
RESERVATIONS: Reservations are based on space
availability and will be confirmed upon receipt of
registration and full payment.

WAITING LIST: If the program sells out, only upon
submission of a waiting list form will you be put on
the waiting list. If there is a cancellation, the first person on the list will be contacted and a notice with
invoice will be e-mailed.

PAYMENTS: Please make checks payable to
I.S.Tours. Registration payments are due no later
than September 01, 2023. All payments received
after September 01, 2023, are considered late and
will be charged a $100.00 late processing fee. Con- firmation is subject to space availability at prevailing rates. Please note that payments by credit card
(Visa, MasterCard or American Express) will incur a
convenience fee of up to 3.1%. Your statement will
reflect the name of I.S. Tours when the charge is
posted. NOTE: Your travel documents WILL NOT BE
RELEASED if payment is not received by September
01, 2023.

NAME CHANGES: Name changes are allowed without
a fee prior to August 10, 2023. From August 10 –
September 8, 2023, name changes are allowed with
a $200 charge. No name changes are allowed after
September 8, 2023. A change of name form must
be provided and emailed to I.S.Tours at mayesa@istours.com. I.S.Tours assumes no responsibility with respect to monies between participants.

CHANGES: The Sacramento Metro Chamber has the
right to withdraw the program, or any part of it to
make such alterations in the itinerary deemed necessary, or to substitute services of comparable value.

Unused portions of the program are not refundable.

EXPENSES: Prices include only those services spe- cifically stated in your tour package. Items such as room service, telephone calls, optional activities and
other incidental items not specifically stated in your
package, are not included.

CANCELLATIONS: Cancellations must be made in
writing and must be emailed to I.S.Tours at maye- [email protected]. A $250.00 per person penalty plus any hotel and airline penalties will apply from date
of booking through July 1, 2023. July 2 – August 10,
2023, a $500 per person penalty plus any hotel and
airline penalties will apply. From August 11, 2023, to
date of departure, the full registration fee is non-refundable and may result in loss of entire program cost. There are no refunds for no-shows.

RESPONSIBILITY: The Sacramento Metro Chamber
and I.S.Tours, their representatives and agents act
only as intermediaries between travel program participants and airlines, hotels and other public service organizations. Both the Sacramento Metro Chamber
and I.S.Tours disclaim any liability for claims, losses, damages, costs for expenses arising out of injury,
accident or death, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment,
loss of pay, upset disappointments, distress or frustration, whether physical or mental resulting from acts of God, weather, overbooking incurred by said
persons or operators to either passengers or bag- gage from whatsoever cause.

I.S.Tours MAINTAINS A TRUST ACCOUNT
(#3368097493) to protect its clients’ payments
pending distribution to suppliers. Additionally,
I.S.Tours participates in California’s Travel Consumer Restitution Fund. Our registration number is 2085879-40. A claim can be filed with the California
State Attorney General within 60 days after you suffer or become aware of loss. Registration as a seller of travel does not constitute approval by the state
of California.

AIR TRANSPORTATION: For scheduled service, Air
Canada and United Airlines are the official airlines
for the 2023 Study Mission. Flight delays and cancellations can occur and are completely outside of the control or responsibility of the Sacramento
Metro Chamber and I.S.Tours. In the event of a delay
or cancellation, Air Canada and/or United Airlines,
not I.S.Tours, determines and provides the compensation, if any, to be provided to passenger(s). Air Canada group tickets cannot be changed and are
non-refundable/non-reusable once ticketed. United
Airlines tickets are non-refundable once ticketed.

Please verify baggage policy for each carrier prior
to departure.

DOCUMENTATION: ALL passengers must present a
valid U.S. or Canadian passport to travel into Canada
and back into the United States. You must submit
your name as it appears on this document and your
date of birth, as required by TSA. Failure to comply
may result in denied boarding and no refunds will
apply. Please visit https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/International-Travel-Country-Information-Pages/Canada.html for specific details.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Option 1 Group Flight Airport Departs Arrives
Weds, Sept. 13 AC#758 SMF/YYZ 9:20AM 5:08PM
Sat, Sept. 16 UA#568 YYZ/DEN 4:18PM 6:07PM
(layover in SLC) UA#2132 DEN/SMF 7:29PM 9:07PM
Option 2* Group Flight Airport Departs Arrives
Weds, Sept. 13 AC#758 SMF/YYZ 9:20AM 5:18PM
Sun, Sept. 17 AC#759 YYZ/SMF 6:25PM 8:49PM
Registration:

Registration costs include three nights: September 13, 14 & 15.

Single Occupancy $3,995 per person
Double Occupancy $3,595 per person
Additional Room Nights
(September 10, 11 or 12)
$535 per room/per night
(inclusive of tax)*
Additional Room Nights
(September 16 or 17)
$385 per room/per night
(inclusive of tax)*
Premium Room Upgrade $50 additional per room/per night* Air Credit ($350) pp
* Based on hotel availability at time of request.
*Please note this flight returns on Sunday, Sept 17 & requires one additional room night.

Sponsors
Presenting Sponsor Chair’s Reception Sponsors Reception Sponsors Los Rios Community
College District
SAFE Credit Union
Silver Sponsor
SACOG
Paratransit
Platinum Sponsors
Event & Sponsorship Information:

Susan Harris Brazelton
[email protected] / ph: 916-826-5410
Registration Information:

Mayes Alfaris
[email protected] / ph: 916-850-1976 x 102
Hotel Accomodations:

Registration includes
September 13, 14 and 15.

The King Edward Hotel
37 King Street East
Toronto, Ontario
(416) 863-9700
Flight Accomodations:

Group flights are operated by Air Canada or United Airlines.

Alternate travel arrangements can be made by contacting Mayes Alfaris from I.S. Tours at [email protected] 916-850-1976 x 102

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2874
File #: 0106-02
Title:

Response to 2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report: Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County
Contact: Dion Louthan 916-774-5362 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.26.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a response to the Placer County Grand Jury’s 2022-23 Final Report: Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County, on behalf of the City Council.

BACKGROUND
On June 27, 2023, the Placer County Grand Jury issued its 2022-23 Final Report: Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County. The report included five (5) findings and two (2) recommendations, based on the Grand Jury’s investigations, as required by law. Of the two (2) recommendations, the Roseville City Council was directed to provide a response to recommendation #2 only. Upon approval by the City Council, the response will be provided to the Presiding Judge of the Placer County Superior Court and to the Placer County Grand Jury.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this particular request.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §20165 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A grand jury report meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Dion Louthan, Assistant City Manager
Dominick Casey, City Manager
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-340
2022-23 Response to Grand Jury Final Report
2023-23 Grand Jury Report on Homelessness within Placer County RESOLUTION NO. 23-340

AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
RESPONSE TO THE 2022-23 GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023, the Placer County Grand Jury issued a final report entitled “Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County”; and
WHEREAS, the report included five (5) findings and two (2) recommendations, based on the Grand Jury’s investigations, as required by law; and WHEREAS, of the two (2) recommendations, the Roseville City Council was directed to provide a response, along with the Mayor, to recommendation #2 only; and WHEREAS, upon approval by the City Council, the responses will be provided to the Presiding Judge of the Placer County Superior Court and to the Placer County Grand Jury; and WHEREAS, the response to the 2022-23 Grand Jury Final Report, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the response to the 2022-23 Grand Jury Final Report on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 __, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________________
City Clerk
916.774.5362 • Fax • 916.774.5485 TDD 916.774.5220 • [email protected] • www.roseville.ca.us August 16, 2023
The Honorable Alan V. Pineschi
Presiding Judge
Superior Court County of Placer
P.O. Box 619072
Roseville, CA 95661
The Honorable Suzanne I. Gazzaniga
Advising Grand Jury Judge
Superior Court County of Placer
P.O. Box 619072
Roseville, CA 95661
Barbara Ferguson
Foreperson
2022-2023 Placer County Grand Jury
11532 B Avenue
Auburn, CA 95603
Re: Response to 2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report
Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County
Dear Honorable Judge Pineschi, Honorable Suzanne I. Gazzaniga, and Placer County Grand Jury:

We would like to thank the Placer County Grand Jury for your continued dedication to the citizens of Placer County. We are pleased to submit our response to the 2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report:

Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County.

Report Title: Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County Report Date: Released to the public on June 27, 2023
Response By: Mayor Bruce Houdesheldt on behalf of City of Roseville City Council

FINDINGS
The 2022-2023 Grand Jury Final Report: Spending on Homelessness Within Placer County contains five (5) specific findings. Pursuant to Penal Code § 933(c), we provide the following responses to those findings “pertaining to matters under the control” of the City of Roseville. For those findings that are not “pertaining to matters under the control” of the City of Roseville, the response will note that.

We agree with the findings numbered: F1 and F4.

We disagree, in whole or in part, with the findings numbered: F3 and F5.

As to finding numbered F2, we are unable to provide a response because the matter is not under the control of the City of Roseville (per Penal Code § 933(c)) and we lack personal knowledge as to the finding.

City Council
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California 95678
F3: It appears there is little to no communication or coordination of spending among the incorporated cities and town, and the county.

Response to F3- We disagree with this finding insofar as it concludes that the City of Roseville does not communicate or coordinate spending and resources related to homelessness with the other jurisdictions in Placer County. The City of Roseville continually coordinates and communicates with the other incorporated cities, town, and Placer County on spending related to homelessness.

The City of Roseville, as with the other incorporated cities, town, and Placer County, actively participates in the Regional Working Group on homelessness. The Regional Working Group consists of representatives from each of these jurisdictions, the local Continuum of Care, and regional partners to address homelessness, including coordination on spending.

Moreover, in many cases, funding sources for the City of Roseville flow through Placer County, which necessitates coordination and communication in order for the City of Roseville to receive and allocate those pass-through funds.

Additionally, the City of Roseville Housing Authority has jurisdiction over Roseville and Rocklin (Placer County Housing Authority also has jurisdiction over Rocklin). The City of Roseville Housing Authority administers funding to Rocklin residents (often as a form of homelessness prevention) as part of their operations. This administration over Roseville and Rocklin, requires close coordination and communication between Roseville, Rocklin, and Placer County.

The above examples are meant to be illustrative of the types of coordination and communication that exist amongst the various agencies and is not an exhaustive list.

F5: The five incorporated cities and one incorporated town in Placer County do not have homeless budget line items that define sources of funding and expenditures.

Response to F5- The City of Roseville is unable to provide a response as it relates to the other incorporated cities, one incorporated town, and Placer County because the matter is not under the control of the City of Roseville (per Penal Code § 933(c)) and we lack personal knowledge as to the findings.

As to the City of Roseville only, we partially disagree with this finding insofar as it concludes the City of Roseville budget does not identify sources of funding and expenditures related to homelessness. We agree that there is not a single “homeless budget” line item, as most of the funding for homelessness (including the sources of funding and expenditures) are included in the individual budget line items for the specific departments, services, or programs where the funding is utilized. All sources of funding and expenditures related to homelessness are included in the City of Roseville’s budget and budget documents, but we agree it is not delineated in a single “homeless budget” line item.

RECOMMENDATION
R2 – Each of the five incorporated cities and one incorporated town in Placer County establish a full accounting of homeless funding and expenditures to its citizens on an annual basis by January 1, 2024, and include in the annual budget going forward.

Response to R2- Recommendation R2, has not yet been implemented, but will be partially implemented as part of the next annual budget. Part of recommendation R2 will not be implemented, to the extent it is requiring a program level budget on homelessness, because it is not reasonable. To clarify, the City of Roseville’s budget is established by fund and department, not by program. Program budgeting is not practical as it would require significant and expensive changes to the City of Roseville’s financial systems. Recommendation R2 will be implemented in the form of a summary of the budget for homeless funding and expenditures in the annual budget documents going forward.

We again would like to thank the 2022-2023 Placer County Grand Jury for its report and service to the City of Roseville.

Sincerely,
Bruce Houdesheldt
Mayor, and on Behalf of the Roseville City Council
Cc: Roseville City Council
Roseville City Attorney
Roseville City Clerk
Placer County Board of Supervisors
Placer County Executive Officer
Placer County Health and Human Services Director

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2866
File #: 0106-04
Title:

League of California Cities Annual Conference 2023 – Designation of Voting Delegate
Contact: Mark Wolinski 916-774-5179 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 6.27.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint, by motion, Council Member Scott Alvord as the voting delegate and Scott Pettingell, Assistant Finance Director, as the alternate voting delegate to the League of California Cities business meeting of the General Assembly.

BACKGROUND
The League of California Cities Annual Conference is being held September 20-22, 2023 in Sacramento, CA. The annual business meeting will be held on Friday, September 22, 2023, when the membership takes action on resolutions that establish League policy.

In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, the City Council must designate a voting delegate. The 2023 Annual Conference Voting Delegate Form is then filed with the League to confirm the voting delegate. (Attachment A) The League Designated voting delegates registered to attend the Annual Conference constitute the League's General Assembly. Voting during the business meeting is an important aspect of the conference where the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual conference resolutions guide cities and the League in efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California.

FISCAL IMPACT
Registration is approximately $650 per delegate and the funds were approved in the City Council’s and Finance Department’s FY2023-24 budgets in the General Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The designation of a voting delegate meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Wolinski, Government Relations Administrator
Megan Scheid, Deputy City Manager
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
League Voting Delegate Form 2023 - Attachment A

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2881
File #: 0900-04-02 & 0400-06-02
Title:

Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project - Adoption of Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Project Approval, Approval of Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Call for Bids
Contact: Jesse Khatkar 916-774-5434 [email protected] Meeting Date: 8/16/2023
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached resolution adopting the Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project; and

2. Approve the project as described therein; and

3. Approve the plans and specifications; and

4. Authorize staff to call for bids.

BACKGROUND
Pleasant Grove Boulevard is a multi-lane arterial roadway providing a connection from West Roseville to Highway 65 and Rocklin. The number of lanes on the roadway vary from four to six lanes. This project will widen the segment between Foothills Boulevard and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard from four to six lanes.

The need for the widening was originally identified in a 1988 traffic analysis that assessed the future impacts of the residential and commercial developments proposed within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan area. City Council adopted the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan in 1989 memorializing the ultimate need for six travel lanes along Pleasant Grove Blvd from Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to Foothills Boulevard. The analysis and ultimate number of lanes for the Roadway was reaffirmed by the adoption of the 2035 General Plan by City Council in August of 2020.

The widening will primarily occur to the interior roadway median, which is sized to accommodate the additional travel lane, while preserving existing exterior curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements. When Pleasant Grove Boulevard was originally constructed, it was built with its curbs in their ultimate right of way location with extra wide medians to allow for widening of the roadway into the median when constructing the ultimate six lane configuration when development necessitated it. The project consists of the following components:

Widening 1.45 miles of roadway from four to six travel lanes; Widening into the median, protecting a majority of the curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping outside the travel way, and the median landscaping to the extent feasible; Traffic Signal Modifications at Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, Country Club Rd, and Foothills Boulevard;
Installation of various underground infrastructure to support the widening and the planned Misty Wood Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well Site (future Environmental Utilities Department project);
Pavement Rehabilitation of the roadway segment.

The project design plans and specifications are completed and attached for review.

Public Outreach:

A range of public outreach occurred during the development of the project plans including a community open house on April 27, 2022 at the Martha Riley Library.

The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was available for a review and comment period from November 7, 2022 through December 9, 2022. The environmental document was advertised:

Through a mailed letter to surrounding properties (300' min. radius from project); Via email newsletters;
On the City’s web site; and
Via a legal notice published in the November 4, 2022 edition of the Roseville Press Tribune.

These notices advised of the IS/MND availability and public comment period. Hard copies of the environmental document were made available at the Permit Center front counter and electronic copies were available via the City’s web site.

A total of four comment letters were received. Three from residents and one from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Each issue brought up in the letters are addressed in the Final Subsequent Initial Study attached to this Council Communication.

Public Works staff will be working closely with the City's Public Affairs and Communications team to keep the community informed of the project’s progress and traffic impacts during the construction phase of the project. Staff will ensure residents and businesses are notified about the project benefits and construction impacts through a variety of methods that may include, but are not limited to: direct mail, signage, social media, web, and email notifications.

If all actions are approved by Council, staff expects to award the contract in late 2023 and begin construction in the spring of 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project is anticipated to cost approximately $13.7M and be primarily funded by the Traffic Mitigation Fund (TMF). The cost to provide infrastructure to support the planned Misty Wood Aquifer Storage and Recovery Well Site (future Environmental Utilities Department project) will be funded with Water Construction funds and the cost to rehabilitate the roadway segment will be funded by the Highway User Tax Fund (HUT). Staff will return to Council with a budget adjustment to fund construction once the bids are received and actual construction totals are determined. No General Fund resources will be used to complete the project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND): In accordance with CEQA (CEQA Guidelines § 15162), a Subsequent Initial Study was prepared for the proposed project, which was initially evaluated at a programmatic level in the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR, certified August 5, 2020) (SCH# 2019080418). The Initial Study conclusion is that all potential impacts can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level.

As such, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements.

Environmental Impact Summary: Impacts are primarily short-term construction related.

Potentially significant impacts were identified for the following environmental issue areas:

Biological Resources
Geology and Soils
Tribal Cultural Resources
Mitigation is standard and includes the application of several construction best management practices as well as 4 recommended mitigation measures. The IS conclusion is that with implementation of all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and an MND is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements.

Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) has been prepared to assist with the tracking and implementation of required mitigation measures.

The Initial Study conclusion is that with implementation of all mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND and MMRP, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and an MND is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements. As such staff recommends adoption of the IS/MND and the MMRP to satisfy the project’s CEQA requirements.

The project environmental document and mitigation monitoring & reporting plan are attached for review.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Khatkar, Associate Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 23-345
Final Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Project Plans
Project Manual
Project Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 23-345

ADOPTING THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

FOR THE PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
WHEREAS, Pleasant Grove Boulevard is a multi-lane arterial roadway providing a connection from West Roseville to Highway 65 and Rocklin; and
WHEREAS, City Council adopted the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan in 1989 memorializing the ultimate need for six travel lanes along Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to Foothills Boulevard (the “Roadway”); and WHEREAS, the analysis and ultimate number of lanes for the Roadway was reaffirmed by the adoption of the 2035 General Plan by City Council in August 2020; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) was prepared for the proposed Pleasant Grove Widening Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the IS/MND was available for a review and comment period from November 7, 2022 through December 9, 2022; and
WHEREAS, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (“MMRP”) has been prepared to assist with the tracking and implementation of required mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study concludes that with implementation of all mitigation measures identified in the MMRP, all potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed to satisfy CEQA requirements; and WHEREAS, staff recommends adoption of the IS/MND and the MMRP to satisfy the project’s CEQA requirements.

WHEREAS, the IS/MND and the MMRP for the Project have been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project is hereby adopted.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project is hereby adopted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 20___, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
FINAL
Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Roseville, California
SCH No. 2019080418
Prepared For
311 Vernon Street
Roseville CA. 95678
Prepared by:
2525 Warren Drive
Rocklin, CA 95677
January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
FINAL
Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Roseville, California
SCH No. 2019080418
January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Table of Contents i January 2023

CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................ES-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Project Location.............................................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................ 2-1

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES.................................................................................................................................. 3-1

3.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 List of Commenters and Response to Comments ............................................................................ 3-1

4.0 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT SUBSEQUENT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.................................................................................................................................................................. 4-1

5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN....................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.2 Purpose of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan.......................................................... 5-1

5.3 Roles and Responsibilities .......................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan......................................................................................... 5-1

6.0 LIST OF APPENDICES..................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Table of Contents ii January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-1 January 2023

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

FINAL SUBSEQUENT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

PLEASANT GROVE BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
Project Title: Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (Project) Lead Agency: City of Roseville
Project Proponent: City of Roseville
Project Location: Pleasant Grove Boulevard from the existing six-lane section east of Foothills Boulevard westerly through Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard.

Project Description: The Project would widen Pleasant Grove Boulevard from four to six travel lanes, configured as three eastbound and three westbound lanes, from the existing six-lane section east of Foothills Boulevard westerly through Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. The new travel lanes would be constructed within the existing center median. The Project includes conforming adjustments to intersections, turn lanes, and signal operations to optimize traffic flow within the Project limits.

For Project details, see Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Chapter

2.0 Project Description (included as Appendix A to this Final Subsequent IS/MND).

Finding: Based on the information contained in the City of Roseville General Plan Update (GPU) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and this Final Subsequent IS/MND, the City of Roseville finds the Project would result in no new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts compared to those described in the GPU EIR because the Project would be implemented consistent with all applicable General Plan goals, policies and implementation measures and mitigation measures described in this Subsequent IS/MND.

This is to certify that the Final Subsequent IS/MND including comments and responses, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, and record of Project approval is available to the general public at: The City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, California, 95678.

Draft Subsequent IS/MND Public Review Period: November 7, 2022 – December 9, 2022 Mitigation Measures Incorporated into the Project to Avoid Significant Effects Biological Resources
BIO-1: Construct the Project during the Nonbreeding Season or Conduct Pre-Construction Surveys for Nesting Migratory Birds and Raptors
To the extent feasible, the City will remove trees and large shrubs during the nonbreeding season for migratory birds and raptors (generally between September 1 and February 28).

If construction activities (including vegetation removal) cannot be confined to the nonbreeding season, the City will retain a qualified wildlife biologist with knowledge of the City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-2 January 2023
relevant species to conduct nesting surveys before the start of construction. The migratory bird and raptor nesting surveys will include a minimum of two separate surveys to look for active migratory bird and raptor nests. Surveys will include a search of all vegetation that provides suitable nesting habitat in the construction area. In addition, a 500-foot area in open space areas adjacent to the construction zone will be surveyed for raptors. For survey areas outside the project site, the biologist will walk areas where property access is authorized. For portions of the survey area without property access, the biologist will scan vegetation using binoculars from the project site or from the public road. One survey should be conducted no more than 14 days prior to construction and the second survey should be conducted within 48 hours of the start of construction or vegetation removal. If no active nests are detected during these surveys, no protective measures are required.

If an active nest is found in the survey area, a no-disturbance buffer will be established around the nest site to avoid disturbance or destruction of the nest until the end of the breeding season (August 31) or after a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the young have fledged and moved out of the nesting substrate (this date varies by species). The extent of these buffers will be determined by the biologist and will depend on the level of construction disturbance, line of sight between the nest and the disturbance, ambient levels of noise and other disturbances, and other topographical or artificial barriers. Suitable buffer distances may vary between species but will be established a minimum of 50 feet from active construction for passerine species and up to 500 feet for non-listed raptor species. A minimum buffer of 1,000 feet will be established for an active Swainson’s hawk nest. If sitespecific conditions or the nature of the activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, or minimal construction activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be used, the City will coordinate with CDFW to determine the appropriate buffer size.

BIO-2: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Roosting Bats and Implement Protection Measures
To obtain the highest likelihood of detection, the following preconstruction bat surveys will be conducted within and adjacent to the construction area for each construction season. If the surveys determine that bats are roosting in the construction area, the City will implement the protective measures described below.

Conduct Preconstruction Tree Surveys
Prior to tree removal or pruning, qualified biologists will examine trees to be removed or pruned for suitable bat roosting habitat. High-value habitat features (e.g., large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, and larger snags,) will be identified, and the area around these features will be searched for bats and bat sign (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, and staining). All mature broadleaf trees should be considered potential habitat for solitary foliage-roosting bat species.

If bat sign is detected, biologists will conduct evening visual emergence survey of the source habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to 1–2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-3 January 2023
nights during the season that construction would be taking place. Night-vision goggles and/or full-spectrum acoustic detectors will be used during emergence surveys to assist in species identification. All emergence surveys will be conducted during favorable weather conditions (calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat activity and no precipitation predicted). Survey methodology may be supplemented as new research identifies advanced survey techniques and equipment that would aid in bat detections.

Identify Protective Measures for Bats Using Trees
If it is determined that bats are using trees within or adjacent to the construction area as roost sites, the City (or its designated contractor) will coordinate with CDFW to identify protective measures to avoid and minimize impacts on roosting bats based on the type of roost and timing of activities. These measures could include the following measures.  If feasible, tree removal and pruning of trees containing an active roost will be avoided between April 1 and September 15 (the maternity period) to avoid impacts on reproductively active females and dependent young.
 If a maternity roost is located, whether solitary or colonial, that roost will remain undisturbed until September 15 or until a qualified biologist has determined that the roost is no longer active.
 If avoidance of nonmaternity roost trees is not possible, tree removal or pruning will be monitored by a qualified biologist. Prior to removal or pruning, the tree will be gently shaken, and several minutes should pass before felling trees or pruning limbs to allow bats time to arouse and leave the tree. The tree then will be removed in pieces, rather than felling the entire tree. The biologists will search downed vegetation for dead and injured bats. The presence of dead or injured bats that are species of special concern will be reported to CDFW.

Conduct Preconstruction Surveys of Culverts
Prior to any work to replace, extend, or remove culverts, a qualified biologist will inspect box and pipe culverts for the presence of roosting bats. The biologist will conduct a daytime inspection/survey of box culverts for bat sign or occupancy to determine whether the structure is being used as a roost. The biologist conducting daytime surveys will listen for audible bat calls and will use the naked eye, binoculars, telescoping inspection mirror, and a high-powered spotlight to inspect culverts, and mud nests if present, for bats.

Surfaces and the ground around the culvert will be surveyed for bat sign, such as guano, staining, and prey remains. Pipe culverts will be inspected from the exterior using the methods listed. If no suitable features are found, and no bats or bat sign are present, then a preconstruction survey within 24 hours prior to construction will be conducted. If suitable features are found, and bats or bat sign are present, additional surveys may be conducted to determine how the culvert is used by bats (i.e., whether it is used as a night roost, maternity roost, migration stopover, or for hibernation).

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-4 January 2023
Implement Protective Measures for Bats Using Culverts
To avoid disturbance, injury, or mortality of bats utilizing culverts for roosting, the City (or its contractor) will conduct all work on these structures during the day (to the extent possible and where appropriate). If this is not possible, portable lights will be used to illuminate the roosting areas prior to and after sunset to deter bats from roosting during nights when work will occur.

Geology and Soils
GEO-1: Conduct Paleontological Monitoring
“Spot-check” monitoring by a qualified paleontologist shall be conducted where the depth of Project excavation exceeds 9 feet. This may occur during relocation of signal poles (up to 11 feet deep) and/or storm drain facilities (up to 9 feet deep). If Pleistocene alluvial deposits are visible at these depths, full-time monitoring shall be required for the remainder of excavations at these locations. If no Pleistocene alluvial deposits are visible at these depths, spot-checking may halt.

Should paleontological resources be found during excavation, the paleontologist shall have the authority to divert heavy machinery away from the find(s) until the scientific value of the fossil(s) can be assessed. If of scientific significance, all pertinent field data shall be collected, and the fossil(s) salvaged. The fossil(s) shall be transported to a laboratory facility for cleaning and preparation prior to being transported and deposited in an accredited repository, such as the UCMP Berkeley, where they can be curated and made available for scientific study.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1: Stop Work in the Event of Unanticipated Discovery of Potential Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs)
If any suspected TCRs are discovered during ground disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC Section 21074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, returning objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. The Tribe does not consider City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-5 January 2023
curation of TCRs to be appropriate or respectful and request that materials not be permanently curated, unless approved by the Tribe.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including, but not limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural character and integrity of a Tribal Cultural Resource may include Tribal Monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Work at the discovery location cannot resume until all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of the CEQA, including AB 52, has been satisfied.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Final Subsequent IS/MND ES-6 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Introduction 1-1 January 2023

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document is the Final Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Final Subsequent IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project. It has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resource Code [PRC] Section 21000 et. seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) as amended. This Final Subsequent IS/MND and Responses to Comments document supplements and updates the Draft Subsequent IS/MND (See Appendix A for the Draft Subsequent IS/MND).

The City of Roseville is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. On November 7, 2022, the Lead Agency distributed the Draft Subsequent IS/MND to public agencies and the general public for review and comment, as indicated in the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (See Appendix B for the Notice of Intent [NOI]). In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines, a 32-day review period, which ended on December 9, 2022, was completed. During the public review period, one agency comment letter (from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board) and three comment emails from Roseville residents were received. These letters and related City responses are presented below in Section 3.0 Comments and Responses.

This Final Subsequent IS/MND and the Draft together constitute the Final CEQA document for the proposed Project. According to the State CEQA Guidelines “A lead agency is required to recirculate a negative declaration when the document must be substantially revised after public notice of its availability has been given pursuant to Section 15072 but prior to its adoption.” According to Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Statute Guidelines, a substantial revision shall mean:
“(1) A new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) The lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required.”
After completion of the public/agency comment period for the Draft Subsequent IS/MND, city staff identified minor editorial changes to mitigation measures BIO-1 and TCR-1 (see Final Subsequent IS/MND Chapter 4.0 for these revisions in redline/strikeout format). As shown in Chapter 4.0, these revisions include minor corrections and clarifications, do not change the substance of mitigation requirements, and do not meet the criteria for recirculation prior to Final Subsequent IS/MND adoption as outlined in Section 15073.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, recirculation is not required.

This Final Subsequent IS/MND and Responses to Comments document is organized as follows:
 Section 1.0 Introduction, provides a discussion of the purpose and structure of the document;  Section 2.0 Project Overview, contains a summary of the Project Description;  Section 3.0 presents written comments received on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND and responses; City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Introduction 1-2 January 2023
 Section 4.0 presents revisions (errata pages) to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND in redline/strikeout format.
 Section 5.0 includes the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), prepared pursuant to PRC Section 21081.6; and,
 Section 6.0 includes the Final Subsequent IS/MND Appendices, including the Draft Subsequent IS/MND (Appendix A) and NOI (Appendix B).

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Project Overview 2-1 January 2023

2.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW

2.1 Project Location
As shown in Figure 2-1, the Project is located in the City of Roseville on Pleasant Grove Boulevard from the existing six-lane section east of Foothills Boulevard westerly through Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard.

2.2 Project Description
The Project includes widening Pleasant Grove Boulevard from four to six travel lanes, configured as three eastbound and three westbound lanes. As shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-3, road widening for the new travel lanes would occur primarily to the interior center median which was designed and sized to accommodate future widening. The Project includes conforming adjustments to intersections, turn lanes, and signal operations to optimize traffic flow within the Project limits.

For additional Project details, see Draft Subsequent IS/MND Chapter 2.0 Project Description (Appendix A).

Approximate Project Area

HALLISSY DR

MCANALLY DR

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

JUNCTION BLVD

GALILEE RD
F
OOT
HIL
L
S
BLV
D
WAS
H
N
I GTO
N
BLVD

MAIN ST

COUNTRY CLU
B
DR

WOODCREEK
OAKS
B
LVD

BASELINE RD

BLUE OAKS BLVD

ATKINSON ST

COOK RIOLO RD

INDUSTRIAL AVE

BRADY LN

NIBLICK DR

CENTRAL AVE
Rio Linda
Citrus Heights
North Highlands
Roseville
Map Date: 4/21/2022
Sources: ESRI, USGS, Placer County
Location: N:\2021\2021-260 City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Blvd Widening\MAPS\Location_Vicinity\Pleasant Grove Blvd Widening.aprx - PGBW Location CEQA 20220421 (JSwager - 4/21/2022) I 0 2,000
Scale in Feet
2021-260 City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Widening
Figure 2-1. Project Location and Vicinity
Figure 2-2. Preliminary Road Widening (West)
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Project Overview 2-4 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Figure 2-3. Preliminary Road Widening (East)
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Project Overview 2-6 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-1 January 2023

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES

3.1 Introduction
In conformance with Section 15088(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Roseville has considered comments on environmental issues from reviewers of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND and has prepared written responses. This section contains copies of all written comments received during the public review period. Comments and responses to comments are not required to be included in an IS/MND but are included here for the public and decision makers for informational purposes.

This section contains the following:
 A list of public agencies, organizations and individuals who submitted written comment on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND during the public comment period; and  Copies of all written comments received during the public comment period and related responses.

3.2 List of Commenters and Response to Comments
Agencies, individuals, and organizations who commented on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND are listed in Table 3-1 below.

Table 3-1. Written Comments Received on the Draft Subsequent IS/MND Letter
Number Sender Date Received
L1 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) December 9, 2022 L2 Linda Brown, Roseville Resident November 17, 2022
L3 Daniel Stender, Roseville Resident November 18, 2022 L4 Shawna K. Segan, Roseville Resident December 8, 2022 Each comment letter or email is presented in the pages following and assigned a number (e.g., L1, L2, L3).

Each comment within each letter or email is further assigned a code in the letter or email right margin for tracking individual responses to comments (e.g., L1.1, L1.2, L2.1, L2.2). The pages following present the comment letters received, followed by written responses to each individual comment.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-2 January 2023
Letter 1. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board – Peter Minkel, received October 17, 2022.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-3 January 2023
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-4 January 2023
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-5 January 2023
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-6 January 2023
Letter 1 Responses to Comments
Response to Comment L1.1
This comment is an introductory paragraph indicating the CVRWQCB is delegated responsibility for protecting the quality of surface and groundwaters of the state and that their comments address concerns surrounding these issues. Comment L1.1 is provided for informational purposes and does not address the adequacy of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. No further response is necessary.

Response to Comment L1.2
This comment provides background information regarding applicable regulations and required permits. It does not address the adequacy of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND, thus the comment is noted and no further response is necessary.

Response to Comment L1.3
This comment is a conclusion statement and does not address the adequacy of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND. The comment is noted for the record and no further response is necessary.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-7 January 2023
Letter 2 Responses to Comments
Response to Comment L2.1
This comment expresses concern that road widening may increase vehicle speed making access to Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Hemmingway Drive more difficult post Project. The comment also notes that many seniors live in the area. To address these concerns, the comment suggests installing a traffic signal at the Hemmingway Drive/Pleasant Grove Boulevard Intersection to possibly slow down vehicle speed and improve side street access to the arterial roadway.

According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(a), a project’s effect on automobile delay (such as the delay experienced by Hemmingway Drive traffic entering Pleasant Grove Boulevard) shall not constitute a significant environmental impact under CEQA. Thus, any delay to accessing Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Hemmingway Drive is not, by definition, a transportation impact under CEQA that requires mitigation.

As discussed in Draft Subsequent IS/MND Section 4.17.2, checklist question a), the proposed project is consistent with all adopted City policies, standards, programs, and plans. All Project facilities would be constructed to applicable standards which were created to minimize the potential for transportation related conflicts. This includes the requirement to eliminate non-signalized left turns across three lanes of City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-8 January 2023
traffic. Thus, the Draft Subsequent IS/MND concludes that the Project would not create or exacerbate disruptions to the performance or safety of the transportation system and related impacts were found to be less than significant.

Regarding the concern that Pleasant Grove Boulevard vehicle speed could make accessing Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Hemmingway Drive more difficult post project, upon project opening this is not expected to be the case because the addition of travel lanes would allow vehicles to spread out more creating larger “gaps” in traffic, improving the ability for side street vehicles to enter the roadway.

See also response to comment L4.2 regarding the suggestion to add a new signal at the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Hemmingway Drive intersection.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-9 January 2023
Letter 3. Email from Daniel Stender received November 18, 2022.

Letter 3 Responses to Comments
Response to Comment L3.1
This comment requests confirmation regarding the type of paving material to be used and expresses concern regarding use of roller compacted concrete which the commenter suggests causes increases noise and vibration.

The Project does not propose the use of roller compacted concrete and will utilize hot mix asphalt for all road paving.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-10 January 2023
Letter 4. Email from Shawna Sagan received December 8, 2022.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-11 January 2023
Letter 4 Responses to Comments
Response to Comment L4.1
This comment expresses concern that even under existing conditions it is difficult to make a right turn onto Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Laporte Drive. Furthermore, due to “speeding” vehicles on Pleasant Grove Boulevard, it is difficult to maneuver over to the left lane for drivers that will travel west to Country Club Drive to make a U-turn. While these are not comments on the adequacy of the CEQA analysis, they do address design issues and related responses are provided below.

As discussed in response L2.1 above, with the addition of Pleasant Grove Boulevard travel lanes, upon Project opening vehicles would have the ability to spread out more along the roadway (because of increased capacity) creating larger “gaps” in traffic, improving the ability for side street vehicles to enter Pleasant Grove Boulevard. These “gaps” would also facilitate lane changes required by west bound vehicles making a U-turn at Country Club Drive. Depending on the time of day and related traffic congestion, should additional distance be required to make the necessary lane changes, vehicles could continue west to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to make the U-turn. Concerns regarding speeding are hereby forwarded to the Roseville Police Department for enforcement as resources allow.

Response to Comment L4.2
This comment notes the Truewood Assisted Living Facility is located across the street from the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Laporte Drive intersection and that ambulances frequently respond to this facility. It also suggests the Pleasant Grove Boulevard south side sidewalk, due to its landscape setback and purported wider pedestrian facilities, is safer than the north side sidewalk where it occurs adjacent the golf course.

Considering these circumstances, the commenter asks if a signal would be better served at this intersection to facilitate emergency access, slow traffic, and allow pedestrians heading west to safely cross to the south side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard to access a wider sidewalk and landscape buffer which may appeal more to pedestrians. While these comments do not address the adequacy of CEQA analysis, they do address Project design considerations and corresponding responses are provided below.

As discussed in the Draft Subsequent IS/MND Project Description, the Project does not include the installation of new traffic signals. Rather, the project implements improvements as originally set forth in the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan (adopted by City Council in 1989), as recently re-affirmed by the adoption of the 2035 General Plan, which also considered compliance with current City Standards and fee programs. Because the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Laporte Drive/Hemmingway Drive intersection does not serve other public roadways and only serves private communities, per city policy the cost of related signal improvements would be the responsibility of the private development it serves. Thus, there is no approved fee program available to fund a new signal at this location as one was not established at the time of private development approval.

As required by City Standards, due to the additional travel lanes, Laporte Drive would be restricted to right and left-turns in and right-turns out only. Motorists entering Pleasant Grove Boulevard from Laporte Drive would be able to turn right and head west on Pleasant Grove Boulevard to make a U-turn at the City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-12 January 2023
next signalized intersection or utilize an alternate neighborhood entrance/exit. As discussed above in response to comment L4.1, if drivers are unable to negotiate lane changes to the far left to make U-turns at Country Club Drive (located approximately 1,500 feet west), they can proceed to the next intersection at Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard to U-turn at that signalized intersection (located an additional approximately 2000 feet west of Country Club Drive). Thus, ample opportunity is available to make the required lane changes.

Regarding comments suggesting the Pleasant Grove Boulevard south sidewalk may be wider and therefore safer than the north sidewalk, these sidewalks are the same size (eight-feet wide). While pedestrians may find the south sidewalk to be more favorable due to enhanced landscape setback compared to the north, the eight-foot sidewalk is consistent with city standards for safety and the width typically allows pedestrians sufficient space to walk side by side and pass if they come upon additional pedestrians.

Regarding the comment that a new signal may facilitate emergency access to the Truewood Assisted Living Facility, as discussed in Draft Subsequent IS/MND Section 4.15.2.1, all Project improvements are designed to minimize the potential for conflicts or collisions and therefore the Project was found to not conflict with emergency vehicle accessibility and services.

Finally, it should be noted that while a new traffic signal at this location may address some of the commenter’s concerns, traffic signal installation can have an adverse effect on safety and efficiency of vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. They can also lead to excessive delay, excessive disobedience of the signal indications, and significant increase in the frequency of collisions (especially rear-end collisions).

Response to Comment L4.3
This comment requests clarification if the Project includes a sound wall to replace the existing wrought iron fence located adjacent to the golf course on the north side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard.

The Project’s traffic noise impacts are evaluated in Draft Subsequent IS/MND Section 4.13 Noise. As discussed in this section, the future traffic noise level on Pleasant Grove Boulevard was modeled based on traffic volumes identified by Fehr & Peers (2022). Draft Subsequent IS/MND Table 4.13-4 (see Appendix A) shows the calculated Pleasant Grove Boulevard noise levels under existing traffic levels compared to future post project traffic levels. As shown, with Project implementation, future Pleasant Grove Boulevard traffic noise between Country Club Drive and Laporte Drive/Hemingway Drive (where the abovementioned wrought iron fence is located) would increase from 68.4 dBA to 68.6 dBA at 75 feet from the roadway centerline (an increase of 0.2 dBA which is imperceivable to the human ear). Because the projected increase does not exceed the adopted significance threshold of 1.5 dBA, the noise impact was found to be less-than-significant, and no mitigation is required. As a result, replacement of the existing wrought iron fence is not required or proposed as part of the Project.

Response to Comment L4.4
This comment requests that the above traffic noise and safety concerns be taken into consideration, particularly given population growth and considering the neighborhood’s location adjacent to the Project.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-13 January 2023
As discussed in Response L4.2 above, project improvements were originally set forth in the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan which was adopted by City Council in 1989. The Project was subsequently reevaluated by the 2035 General Plan Update EIR in August 2020, and again in this Subsequent IS/MND.

Thus, the project is based on current growth projections, City standards and fee programs.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Comments and Responses 3-14 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 4-1 January 2023

4.0 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT SUBSEQUENT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
As noted in Section 3.0, no revisions to the Draft Subsequent IS/MND were required to address public comment. However, as a result of city staff review of the Draft Subsequent IS/MND, revisions were made to Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and TCR-1. These revisions include minor editorial changes and do not constitute substantial revisions that would require recirculation of the document. According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5, a substantial revision shall mean:
(1) A new, avoidable significant effect is identified, and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) The lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required.”
The city-initiated revisions are provided on the following pages. Page numbers refer to the original Draft Subsequent IS/MND page numbering. Changes in text are identified by strikeout where text is removed and by underline where text is added. Revisions shown on the following pages have been incorporated in the Final Subsequent IS/MND Executive Summary Section and Section 5.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-33 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
If construction activities (including vegetation removal) cannot be confined to the nonbreeding season, the City will retain a qualified wildlife biologist with knowledge of the relevant species to conduct nesting surveys before the start of construction. The migratory bird and raptor nesting surveys will include a minimum of two separate surveys to look for active migratory bird and raptor nests. Surveys will include a search of all vegetation that provides suitable nesting habitat in the construction area. In addition, a 500-foot area in open space area areas adjacent to the construction zone will be surveyed for raptors. For survey areas outside the project site, the biologist will walk areas where property access is authorized. For portions of the survey area without property access, the biologist will scan vegetation using binoculars from the project site or from the public road. One survey should be conducted no more than 14 days prior to construction and the second survey should be conducted within 48 hours of the start of construction or vegetation removal. If no active nests are detected during these surveys, no protective measures are required.

If an active nest is found in the survey area, a no-disturbance buffer will be established around the nest site to avoid disturbance or destruction of the nest until the end of the breeding season (August 31) or after a qualified wildlife biologist determines that the young have fledged and moved out of the nesting substrate (this date varies by species). The extent of these buffers will be determined by the biologist and will depend on the level of construction disturbance, line of sight between the nest and the disturbance, ambient levels of noise and other disturbances, and other topographical or artificial barriers. Suitable buffer distances may vary between species but will be established a minimum of 50 feet from active construction for passerine species and up to 500 feet for non-listed raptor species. A minimum buffer of 1,000 feet will be established for an active Swainson’s hawk nest. If site-specific conditions or the nature of the activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation, or minimal construction activities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be used, the City will coordinate with CDFW to determine the appropriate buffer size.

BIO-2: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for Roosting Bats and Implement Protection Measures
To obtain the highest likelihood of detection, the following preconstruction bat surveys will be conducted within and adjacent to the construction area for each construction season. If the surveys determine that bats are roosting in the construction area, the City will implement the protective measures described below.

Conduct Preconstruction Tree Surveys
Prior to tree removal or pruning, qualified biologists will examine trees to be removed or pruned for suitable bat roosting habitat. High-value habitat features (e.g., large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, and larger snags,) will be identified, and the area around these features will be searched for bats and bat sign (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, and staining). All mature broadleaf trees should be considered potential habitat for solitary foliage-roosting bat species.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-127 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
As discussed above, no tribal cultural resources were identified during AB52 Consultation. However, Project grading could result in the unanticipated disturbance to unknow tribal cultural resources, resulting in a potentially significant impact. Should this occur, as discussed in the GPU EIR, various General Plan policies and implementation measures addressing the unanticipated discovery would be implemented. As discussed above, during consultation the UAIC expressed a preference for a previously agreed to unanticipated discovery TCR mitigation measure, and the City found it to be equally as effective as applicable General Plan policy and related implementation measures. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TCR-1, the inadvertent discovery of tribal cultural resources would be a less than significant impact with additional mitigation incorporated.

Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measure shall be implemented to addresses the evaluation and treatment of inadvertent/unanticipated discoveries of potential TCRs during Project ground disturbing activities.

TCR-1: Stop Work in the Event of Unanticipated Discovery of Potential Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs)
If any suspected TCRs are discovered during ground disturbing construction activities, all work shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with a geographic area shall be immediately notified and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC Section 21074). The Tribal Representative will make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.

Preservation in place is the preferred alternative under CEQA and United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) protocols, and every effort must be made to preserve the resources in place, including through project redesign. Culturally appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in place within the landscape, returning objects to a location within the project area where they will not be subject to future impacts. The Tribe does not consider curation of TCRs to be appropriate or respectful and request that materials not be permanently curated, unless approved by the Tribe.

The contractor shall implement any measures deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid, or minimize impacts to the resource, including, but not limited to, facilitating the appropriate tribal treatment of the find, as necessary. Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural character and integrity of a Tribal Cultural Resource may include Tribal Monitoring, culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects, and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Work at the discovery location cannot resume until all necessary investigation and evaluation of the discovery under the requirements of the CEQA, including AB 52, has been satisfied.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 4-4 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-1 January 2023

5.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN

5.1 Introduction
In accordance with CEQA, a Subsequent IS/MND that tiers from the City of Roseville GPU EIR and identifies adverse impacts related to the construction and operation of the proposed Project was prepared. The IS/MND identifies mitigation measures that would reduce or eliminate impacts not otherwise addressed by the GPU EIR.

Section 21081.6 of the PRC and Sections 15091(d) and 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines require public agencies to adopt a reporting and monitoring program for changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.

An MMRP is required for the Project because the Subsequent IS/MND identified potentially significant adverse impacts related to construction and operation of the Project, and mitigation measures have been identified to mitigate these impacts. Adoption of the MMRP will occur along with approval of the Project.

5.2 Purpose of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan This MMRP has been prepared to ensure that all required mitigation measures are implemented and completed according to schedule and maintained in a satisfactory manner during the construction and operation of the Project, as required. The MMRP may be modified by the City during Project implementation, as necessary, in response to changing conditions or other Project refinements. Table 4-1 has been prepared to assist the responsible parties with implementing the MMRP. The table identifies the individual mitigation measures, implementation actions and timing, implementation responsibility, responsibility for oversight of Compliance/Verification (including a notation space to confirm implementation), agency coordination, and comments. The numbering of the mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence in the Draft Subsequent IS/MND.

5.3 Roles and Responsibilities
The City of Roseville Public Works Department and the Project construction contractor are responsible for oversight of compliance of the mitigation measures in the MMRP.

5.4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
The column categories identified in Table 4-1 are described below.  Mitigation Measure – This column lists the mitigation measures by number.  Implementation Actions and Timing - This column summarizes the mitigation activities and reports/deliverables that must be prepared to implement and comply with the required mitigation measure. These actions/reports are described in more detail in the mitigation measure text. This column also lists the timing of each activity, and the frequency/schedule of monitoring for each activity.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-2 January 2023  Implementation Responsibility– This column provides the entities responsible for complying with the requirements of the mitigation measure, agencies responsible for oversight of the mitigation implementation, and any outside agencies that the City of Roseville may need to coordinate with to ensure proper mitigation measure implementation.  Responsibility for Oversight of Compliance/Verification. This column provides the entities responsible for verifying implementation compliance.
 Agency Coordination. This column lists agency coordination that may be required to ensure a coordinating agency’s regulatory interests are satisfied during mitigation measure implementation.
 Comments. This column provides comments to facilitate MMRP implementation.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-3 January 2023 Table 4-1. Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
Biological Resources
BIO-1: Construct the Project during the
Nonbreeding Season or Conduct PreConstruction Surveys for Nesting Migratory Birds and Raptors
To the extent feasible, the City will remove trees
and large shrubs during the nonbreeding season
for migratory birds and raptors (generally
between September 1 and February 28).

If construction activities (including vegetation
removal) cannot be confined to the nonbreeding
season, the City will retain a qualified wildlife
biologist with knowledge of the relevant species
to conduct nesting surveys before the start of
construction. The migratory bird and raptor
nesting surveys will include a minimum of two
separate surveys to look for active migratory bird
and raptor nests. Surveys will include a search of
all vegetation that provides suitable nesting
habitat in the construction area. In addition, a
500-foot area in open space areas adjacent to the
construction zone will be surveyed for raptors.

For survey areas outside the project site, the
biologist will walk areas where property access is
authorized. For portions of the survey area
Action:

Construct the Project
during the
Nonbreeding Season
or Conduct PreConstruction Surveys
for Nesting
Migratory Birds and
Raptors
Timing:

Prior to and during
construction.

City/Consultant
Initials
Date
City
Initials
Date
CDFW
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-4 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
without property access, the biologist will scan
vegetation using binoculars from the project site
or from the public road. One survey should be
conducted no more than 14 days prior to
construction and the second survey should be
conducted within 48 hours of the start of
construction or vegetation removal. If no active
nests are detected during these surveys, no
protective measures are required.

If an active nest is found in the survey area, a nodisturbance buffer will be established around the nest site to avoid disturbance or destruction of
the nest until the end of the breeding season
(August 31) or after a qualified wildlife biologist
determines that the young have fledged and
moved out of the nesting substrate (this date
varies by species). The extent of these buffers will
be determined by the biologist and will depend
on the level of construction disturbance, line of
sight between the nest and the disturbance,
ambient levels of noise and other disturbances,
and other topographical or artificial barriers.

Suitable buffer distances may vary between
species but will be established a minimum of 50
feet from active construction for passerine
species and up to 500 feet for non-listed raptor
species. A minimum buffer of 1,000 feet will be
established for an active Swainson’s hawk nest. If
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-5 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
site-specific conditions or the nature of the
activity (e.g., steep topography, dense vegetation,
or minimal construction activities) indicate that a
smaller buffer could be used, the City will
coordinate with CDFW to determine the
appropriate buffer size.

BIO-2: Conduct Preconstruction Surveys for
Roosting Bats and Implement Protection
Measures
To obtain the highest likelihood of detection, the
following preconstruction bat surveys will be
conducted within and adjacent to the
construction area for each construction season. If
the surveys determine that bats are roosting in
the construction area, the City will implement the
protective measures described below.

Conduct Preconstruction Tree Surveys
Prior to tree removal or pruning, qualified
biologists will examine trees to be removed or
pruned for suitable bat roosting habitat. Highvalue habitat features (e.g., large tree cavities, basal hollows, loose or peeling bark, and larger
snags,) will be identified, and the area around
these features will be searched for bats and bat
sign (e.g., guano, culled insect parts, and
Action:

Preconstruction
Surveys for Roosting
Bats and Implement
Protection Measures
Timing:

Prior to and during
construction.

Project Biologist
Initials
Date
City
Initials
Date
CDFW
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-6 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
staining). All mature broadleaf trees should be
considered potential habitat for solitary foliageroosting bat species.

If bat sign is detected, biologists will conduct
evening visual emergence survey of the source
habitat feature, from a half hour before sunset to
1–2 hours after sunset for a minimum of 2 nights
during the season that construction would be
taking place. Night-vision goggles and/or fullspectrum acoustic detectors will be used during emergence surveys to assist in species
identification. All emergence surveys will be
conducted during favorable weather conditions
(calm nights with temperatures conducive to bat
activity and no precipitation predicted). Survey
methodology may be supplemented as new
research identifies advanced survey techniques
and equipment that would aid in bat detections.

Identify Protective Measures for Bats Using Trees
If it is determined that bats are using trees within
or adjacent to the construction area as roost sites,
the City (or its designated contractor) will
coordinate with CDFW to identify protective
measures to avoid and minimize impacts on
roosting bats based on the type of roost and
timing of activities. These measures could include
the following measures.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-7 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
• If feasible, tree removal and pruning of trees
containing an active roost will be avoided
between April 1 and September 15 (the
maternity period) to avoid impacts on
reproductively active females and dependent
young.
• If a maternity roost is located, whether
solitary or colonial, that roost will remain
undisturbed until September 15 or until a
qualified biologist has determined that the
roost is no longer active.
• If avoidance of nonmaternity roost trees is
not possible, tree removal or pruning will be
monitored by a qualified biologist. Prior to
removal or pruning, the tree will be gently
shaken, and several minutes should pass
before felling trees or pruning limbs to allow
bats time to arouse and leave the tree. The
tree then will be removed in pieces, rather
than felling the entire tree. The biologists will
search downed vegetation for dead and
injured bats. The presence of dead or injured
bats that are species of special concern will
be reported to CDFW.

Conduct Preconstruction Surveys of Culverts
Prior to any work to replace, extend, or remove
culverts, a qualified biologist will inspect box and
pipe culverts for the presence of roosting bats.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-8 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
The biologist will conduct a daytime
inspection/survey of box culverts for bat sign or
occupancy to determine whether the structure is
being used as a roost. The biologist conducting
daytime surveys will listen for audible bat calls
and will use the naked eye, binoculars,
telescoping inspection mirror, and a highpowered spotlight to inspect culverts, and mud nests if present, for bats.

Surfaces and the ground around the culvert will
be surveyed for bat sign, such as guano, staining,
and prey remains. Pipe culverts will be inspected
from the exterior using the methods listed. If no
suitable features are found, and no bats or bat
sign are present, then a preconstruction survey
within 24 hours prior to construction will be
conducted. If suitable features are found, and
bats or bat sign are present, additional surveys
may be conducted to determine how the culvert
is used by bats (i.e., whether it is used as a night
roost, maternity roost, migration stopover, or for
hibernation).

Implement Protective Measures for Bats Using
Culverts
To avoid disturbance, injury, or mortality of bats
utilizing culverts for roosting, the City (or its
contractor) will conduct all work on these
structures during the day (to the extent possible
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-9 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
and where appropriate). If this is not possible,
portable lights will be used to illuminate the
roosting areas prior to and after sunset to deter
bats from roosting during nights when work will
occur.

Geology and Soils
GEO-1: Conduct Paleontological Monitoring
“Spot-check” monitoring by a qualified
paleontologist shall be conducted where the
depth of Project excavation exceeds 9 feet. This
may occur during relocation of signal poles (up to
11 feet deep) and/or storm drain facilities (up to
9 feet deep). If Pleistocene alluvial deposits are
visible at these depths, full-time monitoring shall
be required for the remainder of excavations at
these locations. If no Pleistocene alluvial deposits
are visible at these depths, spot-checking may
halt.

Should paleontological resources be found
during excavation, the paleontologist shall have
the authority to divert heavy machinery away
from the find(s) until the scientific value of the
fossil(s) can be assessed. If of scientific
significance, all pertinent field data shall be
collected, and the fossil(s) salvaged. The fossil(s)
shall be transported to a laboratory facility for
Action:

Conduct
Paleontological
Monitoring
Timing:

During construction
Project
Paleontologist/
Contractor
Initials
___________________
Date
City
Initials
_________________
Date
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-10 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
cleaning and preparation prior to being
transported and deposited in an accredited
repository, such as the UCMP Berkeley, where
they can be curated and made available for
scientific study.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1: Stop Work in the Event of
Unanticipated Discovery of Potential Tribal
Cultural Resources (TCRs)
If any suspected TCRs are discovered during
ground disturbing construction activities, all work
shall cease within 100 feet of the find, or an
agreed upon distance based on the project area
and nature of the find. A Tribal Representative
from a California Native American tribe that is
traditionally and culturally affiliated with a
geographic area shall be immediately notified
and shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC
Section 21074). The Tribal Representative will
make recommendations for further evaluation
and treatment as necessary.

Preservation in place is the preferred alternative
under CEQA and United Auburn Indian
Community (UAIC) protocols, and every effort
must be made to preserve the resources in place,
including through project redesign. Culturally
Action:

Stop Work in the
Event of
Unanticipated
Discovery of
Potential Tribal
Cultural Resources
Timing:

During construction
Project
Archaeologist/
Contractor
Initials
Date
City
Initials
Date
UAIC
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-11 January 2023 Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Actions and Timing
Implementation
Responsibility
Responsibility
for Oversight
of
Compliance/
Verification
Agency
Coordination Comments
appropriate treatment may be, but is not limited
to, processing materials for reburial, minimizing
handling of cultural objects, leaving objects in
place within the landscape, returning objects to a
location within the project area where they will
not be subject to future impacts. The Tribe does
not consider curation of TCRs to be appropriate
or respectful and request that materials not be
permanently curated, unless approved by the
Tribe.

The contractor shall implement any measures
deemed by the CEQA lead agency to be
necessary and feasible to preserve in place, avoid,
or minimize impacts to the resource, including,
but not limited to, facilitating the appropriate
tribal treatment of the find, as necessary.

Treatment that preserves or restores the cultural
character and integrity of a Tribal Cultural
Resource may include Tribal Monitoring,
culturally appropriate recovery of cultural objects,
and reburial of cultural objects or cultural soil.

Work at the discovery location cannot resume
until all necessary investigation and evaluation of
the discovery under the requirements of the
CEQA, including AB 52, has been satisfied.

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 5-12 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
List of Appendices 6-1 January 2023

6.0 LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Draft Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Appendix B – Notice of Intent

City of Roseville
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
List of Appendices 6-2 January 2023

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

APPENDIX A
Draft Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project, November 2022.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT
Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Roseville, California
SCH No. 2019080418
Prepared For
311 Vernon Street
Roseville CA. 95678
Prepared By:
2525 Warren Drive
Rocklin, California 95677
November 2022

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project i 2021-260

CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Prior CEQA Documentation ....................................................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Project Location and Background ........................................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 City of Roseville Transportation System 2035 Capital Improvement Program ..................... 2-1

2.2.1 Community Outreach .................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.3 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2-3

2.4 Project Purpose, Need and Objectives .................................................................................................. 2-3

2.5 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................................................ 2-4

2.5.1 Project Components and Characteristics ............................................................................. 2-4

2.6 Construction Schedule and Approach ................................................................................................... 2-4

2.6.1 Equipment and Materials Staging Area ................................................................................ 2-5

2.6.2 Construction Best Management Practices........................................................................... 2-1

2.7 Regulatory Requirements, Permits, and Approvals .......................................................................... 2-4

2.8 Consultation with California Native American Tribe(s) ................................................................... 2-4

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED AND Determination ......................................... 3-1

3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected......................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................ 4-1

4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................. 4-1

4.1.2 Aesthetics (I) Environmental Checklist and Discussion .................................................. 4-2

4.1.3 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................... 4-4

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ........................................................................................................ 4-4

4.2.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................. 4-4

4.2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources (II) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 4-5

4.2.3 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................... 4-7

4.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-7

4.3.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................. 4-7

4.3.2 Air Quality (III) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ............................................... 4-8

4.3.3 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................. 4-18

4.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................................... 4-18

4.4.1 Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 4-18 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project ii 2021-260

4.4.2 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-20

4.4.3 Evaluation of Species Identified in the Literature Search............................................4-21

4.4.4 Sensitive Natural Communities..............................................................................................4-27

4.4.5 Wildlife Movement/Corridors and Nursery Sites............................................................4-28

4.4.6 Critical Habitat..............................................................................................................................4-28

4.4.7 Protected Trees ............................................................................................................................4-28

4.4.8 Biological Resources (IV) Environmental Checklist and Discussion.........................4-28

4.4.9 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-32

4.5 Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................................................4-35

4.5.1 Methods ..........................................................................................................................................4-35

4.5.2 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-37

4.5.3 Research Results ..........................................................................................................................4-38

4.5.4 Cultural Resources (V) Environmental Checklist and Discussion..............................4-46

4.5.5 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-48

4.6 Energy...............................................................................................................................................................4-48

4.6.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-48

4.6.2 Energy (VI) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ....................................................4-50

4.6.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-52

4.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................................4-52

4.7.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-52

4.7.2 Geology and Soils (VII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ............................4-57

4.7.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-64

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................................................4-64

4.8.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-64

4.8.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions (VIII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion .........4-66

4.8.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-71

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.........................................................................................................4-71

4.9.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-71

4.9.2 Hazards and Hazardous Materials (IX) Environmental Checklist and Discussion.......................................................................................................................................4-72

4.9.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-77

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................................................................4-77

4.10.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-77

4.10.2 Regulatory Setting ......................................................................................................................4-78

4.10.3 Hydrology and Water Quality (X) Environmental Checklist and Discussion........4-79 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project iii 2021-260

4.10.4 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-83

4.11 Land Use and Planning ..............................................................................................................................4-83

4.11.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-83

4.11.2 Land Use and Planning (XI) Environmental Checklist and Discussion....................4-84

4.11.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-85

4.12 Mineral Resources........................................................................................................................................4-85

4.12.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-85

4.12.2 Mineral Resources (XII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion............................4-86

4.12.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-87

4.13 Noise .................................................................................................................................................................4-87

4.13.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-87

4.13.2 Noise (XIII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ....................................................4-91

4.13.3 Mitigation Measures ..................................................................................................................4-98

4.14 Population and Housing ...........................................................................................................................4-98

4.14.1 Environmental Setting...............................................................................................................4-98

4.14.2 Population and Housing (XIV) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ..............4-99

4.14.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-100

4.15 Public Services............................................................................................................................................ 4-100

4.15.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................ 4-100

4.15.2 Public Services (XV) Environmental Checklist and Discussion................................ 4-101

4.15.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-103

4.16 Recreation .................................................................................................................................................... 4-103

4.16.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................ 4-103

4.16.2 Recreation (XVI) Environmental Checklist and Discussion...................................... 4-103

4.16.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-105

4.17 Transportation............................................................................................................................................ 4-105

4.17.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................ 4-105

4.17.2 Transportation (XVII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion ............................. 4-121

4.17.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-124

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ....................................................................................................................... 4-124

4.18.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................ 4-124

4.18.2 Tribal Cultural Resources (XVIII) Environmental Checklist and Discussion........ 4-126

4.18.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-127

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................................................ 4-128

4.19.1 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................ 4-128 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project iv 2021-260

4.19.2 Utilities and Service Systems (XIX) Environmental Checklist and Discussion .................................................................................................................................... 4-129

4.19.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-132

4.20 Wildfire .......................................................................................................................................................... 4-132

4.20.1 Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 4-132

4.20.2 Wildfire (XX) Environmental Checklist and Discussion .............................................. 4-132

4.20.3 Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................... 4-134

4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................................. 4-135

4.21.1 Mandatory Findings of Significance (XXI) Environmental Checklist and Discussion .................................................................................................................................... 4-135

5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ....................................................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 ECORP Consulting, Inc. ................................................................................................................................ 5-1

5.2 City of Roseville .............................................................................................................................................. 5-1

5.3 Psomas, Engineering ..................................................................................................................................... 5-1

5.4 Fehr & Peers Associates, Transportation Analysis ............................................................................ 5-1

5.5 Callander Associates, Arborist Report.................................................................................................... 5-2

6.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. General Lane Increases .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Figure 2-1. Project Location and Vicinity ............................................................................................................................... 2-2 Figure 2-2. Preliminary Road Widening (West) ................................................................................................................... 2-1 Figure 2-3. Preliminary Road Widening (East) ..................................................................................................................... 2-2 Figure 2-4. Staging Area ............................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 Figure 4.4-1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Units .............................................................................. 4-22 Figure 4.5-1. Overview from western end of Project Area, 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (view east-southeast; June 9, 2022). ................................................................................................ 4-43 Figure 4.5-2. Paved, mulched, and landscaped median in Pleasant Grove Boulevard (view southwest; June 9, 2022). .................................................................................................................................................................. 4-44 Figure 4.5-3. Overview: area of increased visibility in Pleasant Grove Boulevard median, south of Woodcreek Oaks Preserve (view east-northeast; June 9, 2022). ................................................................ 4-44 Figure 4.5-4. Overview: northern Project Area boundary at Foothills Boulevard (view southeast, June 9, 2022). ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4-45 Figure 4.5-5. Overview: staging area at eastern end of Project Area; Pleasant Grove Boulevard overpass, background left (view west-southwest, June 9, 2022). .................................................................................. 4-45 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project v 2021-260
Figure 4.5-6. Overview: dense invasive vegetation in staging area (view northeast, June 9, 2022). ............ 4-46 Figure 4.7-1. Geologic map showing Project alignment (yellow) and geologic unit (Qtl = Turlock Lake Formation) found at the Project site (USGS 1992). ............................................................................... 4-62 Figure 4.17-1. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Existing Conditions .......................... 4-106 Figure 4.17-2: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations – Existing Plus Project Conditions 4-112 Figure 4.17-3: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations – Cumulative No Project Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................... 4-115 Figure 4.17-4: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................... 4-118

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Construction Phasing ............................................................................................................................................... 2-5 Table 2-2. Construction Equipment List ................................................................................................................................. 2-1 Table 4.3-1. Construction-Related Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions .......................................................................... 4-12 Table 4.3-2. Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions for AM & PM Peak Periods (Maximum Pounds per Day) ............................................................................................................................................................ 4-13 Table 4.3-3. Operational-Related Emissions Summary .................................................................................................. 4-14 Table 4.5-1. Previous Cultural Studies in the Project Area or within the Records Search Radius ................. 4-38 Table 4.5-2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within the Records Search Radius ................................ 4-40 Table 4.5-3. GLO Land Patent Records ................................................................................................................................. 4-41 Table 4.6-1. Automotive Fuel Consumption in Placer County 2016-2021 ............................................................. 4-49 Table 4.6-2. Proposed Project Construction Fuel Consumption................................................................................. 4-50 Table 4.6-3. Proposed Project Post-Construction Operations Fuel Consumption .............................................. 4-51 Table 4.7-1. Closest Known Fossil Localities ....................................................................................................................... 4-63 Table 4.8-1. Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions .................................................................................. 4-68 Table 4.8-2. Operational GHG Emissions for AM & PM Peak Periods (Metric Tons Annually) ...................... 4-69 Table 4.8-3. Operational-Related GHG Emissions Summary ....................................................................................... 4-70 Table 4.13-1. ANSI Standard 12.9-2013/Part 3 A-weighted Sound Levels Corresponding to Land Use and Population Density .......................................................................................................................... 4-89 Table 4.13-2. Existing (Baseline) Traffic Noise Levels for Residential Surrounding Uses .................................. 4-91 Table 4.13-3. Construction Average (dBA) Noise Levels at Nearest Residential Receptors ............................ 4-93 Table 4.13-4. Existing Plus Project Conditions Predicted Traffic Noise Levels ...................................................... 4-95 Table 4.13-4. Representative Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment .......................................... 4-96 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project vi 2021-260
Table 4.13-5. Onsite Construction Vibration Levels at 85 Feet ................................................................................... 4-97 Table 4.17-1. Intersection LOS Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 4-107 Table 4.17-2: ADT – Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 4-110 Table 4.17-3. Level of Service – Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................... 4-110 Table4.17-4: Level of Service – Existing Plus Project Conditions ............................................................................. 4-113 Table 4.17-5. ADT – Cumulative No Project Conditions ............................................................................................. 4-114 Table 4.17-6: Level of Service – Cumulative No Project Conditions ...................................................................... 4-116 Table 4.17-7. ADT – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................... 4-119 Table 4.17-8. Level of Service – Cumulative Plus Project Conditions .................................................................... 4-119

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Arborist Report, Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project Appendix B: Air Quality
B-1: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (ECORP Consulting, Inc. July 2022,) B-2: Air Quality Construction Emissions Model Outputs
B-3: Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions Model Outputs Appendix C: Biological Resources Assessment for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Appendix D: Cultural Resources Inventory Report for the City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Appendix E: Paleontological Assessment Memorandum for the City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Boulevard Project, Placer County, California
Appendix F: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project, 7465 Foothills Boulevard
Appendix G: Noise Assessment
G-1: Noise Impact Assessment for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
G-2: Traffic Noise Model Output
G-3: Construction Noise Model Output
Appendix H – Pleasant Grove Widening Project Traffic Study Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project vii 2021-260

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Term Description
AB Assembly Bill
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ADT Average Daily Traffic
Amsl Above Mean Sea Level
ANSI American National Standards Institute
BCC Birds of Conservation Concern
BERD Built Environment Resource Directory
BGS Below Ground Surface
BLM Bureau of Land Management
BMP Best Management Practices
BP Before Present
BRA Biological Resources Assessment
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CARB California Air Resource Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CGS California Geological Survey
CH4 Methane
CHL California Historical Landmarks
CHP California Highway Patrol
CHRIS California Historic Resources Information System Center CIP Capital Improvement Program
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CNEL community noise equivalent level
CNP Cumulative No Project
CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO carbon monoxide
CPP Cumulative Plus Project
CRPR California Rare Plant Ranks
CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency
dBA A-Weighted Decibel
DBH Diameter Breast Height
DHS Department of Health Services
DOF Department of Finance
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
DWR Department of Water Resources
EIR) Environmental Impact Report
EMFAC EMission FACtor model
EPP Existing Plus Project
ESA Endangered Species Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project viii 2021-260 Term Description
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GLO General Land Office
GMP Groundwater Management Plan
GPU General Plan Update
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
I- Interstate
IS) Initial Study
kWh Kilowatt-Hours
Ldn average daily noise levels
Leq equivalent noise level
LID Low-Impact Development
LOS Level of Service
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
Mph Miles Per Hour
MRZ Mineral Resource Zone
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
MSL Mean Sea Level
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NCIC North Central Information Center
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NOX Nitrous Oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPS National Park Service
NRCS National Resources Conservation Service
O3 Ozone
OHP Office of Historic Preservation
PCAPCD Placer County Air Pollution Control District
PCCP Placer County Conservation Program
PG&E Pacific Gas & Electric Company
PM2.5 Fine Particulate Matter (PM less than 2.5 microns in diameter) PM10 Coarse Particulate Matter (PM less than 10 microns in diameter) Ppm Parts Per Million
PPV Peak Particle Velocity
PRC Public Resources Code
RCEM Roadway Construction Emissions Model
RMC Roseville Municipal Code
ROG Reactive Organic Gas
RPA Registered Professional Archaeologist
SACOG Sacramento Area Council of Governments
SB Senate Bill
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SIP State Implementation Plan
SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act
SPCCP Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project ix 2021-260
Term Description
SR State Route
SSC Species of Special Concern
SSSC Side Street Stop-Sign-Controlled Intersection
SVAB Sacramento Valley Air Basin
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TCR Tribal Cultural Resources
THRIS Tribal Historic Information System
UAIC United Auburn Indian Community
UCMP University of California Museum of Paleontology
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
VMT Vehicle Miles Travelled
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project x 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 1-1 2021-260

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction
This Subsequent Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) addresses the potential environmental impacts of the City of Roseville’s proposed Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (Project) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City, as CEQA Lead Agency, proposes to widen an approximately 1.3-mile section of Pleasant Grove Boulevard to address existing and expected future traffic congestion and improve circulation consistent with the City’s Transportation System Capital Improvement Program. The Project consists of widening Pleasant Grove Boulevard from two to three lanes in each direction beginning at approximately 1,500 feet east of Foothills Boulevard extending to approximately 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Widening would primarily occur to the interior roadway median, which is sized to accommodate the additional travel lane, while preserving existing exterior curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements.

1.2 Prior CEQA Documentation
The Project is identified and analyzed in the City of Roseville 2035 General Plan Update (GPU) Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2019080418) (City of Roseville, August 5, 2020). The GPU EIR identifies the addition of two travel lanes (one in each direction) to Pleasant Grove Boulevard generally between Foothills Boulevard and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (Figure 1-1). However, the GPU EIR did not identify or include analysis of Project related striping and turn lane modifications proposed west of Woodcreek Oaks and east of Foothill’s Boulevard. This IS/MND is a Subsequent CEQA document based largely on information contained in the GPU EIR and evaluates the project in its entirety and not just the project modifications not previously included in the GPU EIR.

The City’s evaluation of the potential effects of the project modifications follows the approach provided in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and as interpreted and described by the California Supreme Court.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 was validated by the California Supreme Court in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College District (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937 as applying to MNDs. In that decision, the Court further held that “when there is a change in plans, circumstances, or available information after a project has received initial approval, the agency's environmental review obligations ‘turn on the value of the new information to the still pending decision making process.’ (Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council (1989) 490 U.S. 360, 374 [104 L. Ed. 2d 377, 109 S. Ct. 1851] (Marsh).) If the original environmental document retains some informational value despite the proposed changes, then the agency proceeds to decide under CEQA's Subsequent review provisions whether project changes will require major revisions to the original environmental document because of the involvement of new, previously unconsidered significant environmental effects.” Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 1-2 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Figure 1-1. General Plan Lane Increases
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Proposed Project
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 1-2 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 1-1 2021-260
Chapter 4, Environmental Checklist, describes the current environmental baseline conditions for the Project and analyzes the potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project modifications. The analysis first summarizes the GPU EIR impact findings applicable to the Project. This is followed by analysis of whether the project would result in a new significant impact, substantially more severe impact, a lessthan-significant impact with additional mitigation, or no new impact compared to that disclosed in the GPU EIR. The Initial Study checklist in Chapter 4 has been modified to be consistent with these impact determinations. All pertinent mitigation measures identified in the GPU EIR will be applied to the subsequent Project. In addition, where new potential impacts or substantially greater impacts are identified, new mitigation measures are proposed to reduce potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. In addition, for the issues of biological resources, tribal cultural resources and paleontological resources, this Subsequent IS identifies new “Project Level” substitute mitigation measures that are found to be equally as effective at reducing potential impacts to a less-than-significant as those presented in the GPU EIR.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 1-2 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-1 2021-260

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project Location and Background
Pleasant Grove Boulevard is an existing four- and six-lane arterial road that runs east to west through the north central portion of the City of Roseville (Figure 2-1). It begins east of State Route (SR) 65 at the City’s eastern boundary with the City of Rocklin and extends west approximately 6.3 miles to Westbrook Boulevard near the City’s western boundary. Pleasant Grove Boulevard, which experiences heavy daily traffic congestion, serves as one of the main east-west travel corridors connecting residents traveling from the West Roseville area to popular shopping and dining destinations and Class A office buildings in the North Central Roseville Specific Plan area. Pleasant Grove Boulevard provides a vital economic link from residential areas to shopping and employment centers via its connections with other major arterial thoroughfares, including Roseville Parkway, Washington Boulevard, Foothills Boulevard, Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard, Sun City Boulevard, Fiddyment Road and Westbrook Boulevard, as well as to regional highways including SR-65 and Interstate (I-) 80.

2.2 City of Roseville Transportation System 2035 Capital Improvement Program
The City’s Transportation System 2035 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies planned improvements to the city-wide road network to reduce congestion and enhance accessibility for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. Transportation system CIP improvements are funded by traffic impact fees assessed on new development. The proposed Project would implement certain planned CIP improvements within the Project Limits with funding provided by the CIP fee program. No federal funding would be used for the Project.

2.2.1 Community Outreach
On April 27, 2022, the City hosted an open house at the Martha Riley Library to allow community members the opportunity to learn about the Project, ask questions, and provide feedback on the proposed design and construction approach. The open house was attended by approximately 40 community members. Community input focused on the following:
 Clarification on the limits of Project widening.
 Limitations and restrictions on turning movements at side street stop-sign-controlled intersections.
 Preservation of trees and vegetation in the median.
 Lane closures and duration during construction.
 Congestion at Foothills and Pleasant Grove Boulevard intersection.  Status and design of bike lanes.
 Potential effects to existing exterior roadside landscaping.

Approximate Project Area

HALLISSY DR

MCANALLY DR

PLEASANT GROVE BLVD

JUNCTION BLVD

GALILEE RD
F
OOT
HIL
L
S
BLV
D
WAS
H
N
I GTO
N
BLVD

MAIN ST

COUNTRY CLU
B
DR

WOODCREEK
OAKS
B
LVD

BASELINE RD

BLUE OAKS BLVD

ATKINSON ST

COOK RIOLO RD

INDUSTRIAL AVE

BRADY LN

NIBLICK DR

CENTRAL AVE
Rio Linda
Citrus Heights
North Highlands
Roseville
Map Date: 4/21/2022
Sources: ESRI, USGS, Placer County
Location: N:\2021\2021-260 City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Blvd Widening\MAPS\Location_Vicinity\Pleasant Grove Blvd Widening.aprx - PGBW Location CEQA 20220421 (JSwager - 4/21/2022) I 0 2,000
Scale in Feet
2021-260 City of Roseville Pleasant Grove Widening
Figure 2-1. Project Location and Vicinity
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-3 2021-260
 Increased traffic noise.
 Potential for increased speeding due to road widening.

2.3 Existing Conditions
Within the Project limits, Pleasant Grove Boulevard is primarily a four-lane roadway with Class II bike lanes, meandering sidewalks and associated landscaping, a variable width landscaped median, and a posted speed limit of 45 Miles Per Hour (mph). Immediately east of the Project limits, Pleasant Grove Boulevard widens to a six-lane roadway east of Foothills Boulevard and serves as a four-lane roadway west of the Project limits. No on-street parking exists within the Project limits.

The existing median within the Project limits was sized to accommodate the proposed widening to provide a third through-lane in each direction. Portions of the existing median accommodate landscaping consisting of shrubs, native oaks, and ornamental trees. Some native oaks (Quercus sp.) within the median and roadside landscape areas pre-date road construction and are of substantial size, creating a tree lined canopy in some locations.

All existing arterial road intersections within the Project limits are signal-controlled with pedestrianactivated crosswalks and include single, double, and triple left-turn lanes. Where needed, existing curbs within the Project Limits and that are the responsibility of the City that do not meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards would be upgraded as part of the Project. In addition, the following three side street stop-sign-controlled intersections exist within the Project Limits.  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Birkdale Drive/Retreat Way  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Laporte Drive/Hemingway Drive  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Misty Wood Drive
Full turning movements are currently allowed at the above intersections.

2.4 Project Purpose, Need and Objectives
The Project purpose is to decrease existing and future traffic congestion as well as improve circulation consistent with the City’s Transportation System CIP and applicable General Plan policy, while enhancing safety for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. The Project would increase Pleasant Grove Boulevard vehicle capacity consistent with the existing six-lane section located east of the Project limit to SR-65. The Project purpose also includes improving existing pedestrian curb ramps at crosswalk intersections within the Project limits consistent with current ADA requirements.

The Project has been anticipated since 1989 and is proposed now because of the degree to which AM and PM Peak Hour traffic demand is impacting Level of Service (LOS) within the Project limits, and because some existing pedestrian facilities don’t meet current ADA standards. Combined, these needs create traffic operation deficiencies for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists, resulting in moderate delays and wasted fuel, which are expected to be exacerbated by anticipated increases in traffic from expected future population and employment growth.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-4 2021-260
Based on the above purpose and need, the Project objectives include implementing appropriate adopted CIP transportation system improvements within the Project limits to:
 Improve vehicular traffic flow and level of service.
 Improve vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle mobility consistent with current ADA requirements and City standards.
 Address anticipated utility requirements to minimize the future need for trenching/road cuts within newly paved areas.
 Retain median and roadside landscape trees and/or include replacement trees and landscape plantings consistent with City policy to the degree feasible.

2.5 Proposed Project
The proposed Project includes widening of Pleasant Grove Boulevard from two to three lanes in each direction beginning 1,500 feet east of Foothills Boulevard to 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard (Project Limits).

2.5.1 Project Components and Characteristics
The overall road widening Project is shown on Figures 2-2 and 2-3. The primary project components are described below.

The location and limits of proposed road widening, lane striping and related Project improvements are shown on Figures 2-2 and 2-3. As shown, the Project would widen Pleasant Grove Boulevard from four to six travel lanes, configured as three eastbound and three westbound lanes, from the existing six-lane section east of Foothills Boulevard west through Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Road widening would primarily occur to the interior median, which is sized to accommodate the additional travel lanes while preserving the roadway’s existing exterior curb, gutter, and sidewalk. With one small exception (see Rightof-Way Acquisition), all road widening will occur within the existing right-of-way.

Proposed widening between Misty Wood Drive and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard would be accomplished by removing a portion of the existing median and adding a third lane in each direction of travel on the inside of the existing roadway.

At the Foothills Boulevard intersection, the free right-turn lane island at the northwest corner of the intersection would be removed and replaced with a dedicated right-turn lane from southbound Foothills Boulevard to westbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Widening east of Foothills Boulevard would be accommodated by relocating the west-to north-bound right-turn lane to the north, allowing area for an additional third westbound through lane to extend the south bound left-turn lane storage. Striping would be modified on Pleasant Grove Boulevard to provide an additional third through lane in each direction of travel at the Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard intersection. The proposed Project would join existing roadway improvements approximately 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard.

Figure 2-2. Preliminary Road Widening (West)
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-2 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Figure 2-3. Preliminary Road Widening (East)
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-4 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-1 2021-260

2.5.1.1 Landscape Median Tree Removal
Pleasant Grove Boulevard was originally designed and constructed to accommodate the planned future road widening to occur within the interior landscape median. The existing center median supports both planted ornamental landscape trees and native oaks. Some of the native oaks were existing and incorporated into the center median at the time of road construction. Given Pleasant Grove Boulevard was constructed over 25 years ago, some of the original native oaks preserved in the median, and some that were planted in the median, have grown to a size that now conflicts with planned road widening and require removal.

Native oak trees are protected in Roseville by the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (Roseville Municipal Code Chapter 19.66 Tree Preservation). The City’s Tree Ordinance regulates removal of native oaks and construction activities that occur within a native oak’s protected zone (defined as the drip line + 1 foot).

For a detailed discussion of ordinance requirements, refer to the Biological Resources section of this Initial Study.

Consistent with ordinance requirements, an Arborist Report has been prepared for the Project (Callander Associates Landscape Architecture, Inc. September 16, 2022.) (IS/MND Appendix A). The Arborist Report included a Level 2 – Basic Visual Assessment of all trees within the Project Limits in accordance with the International Society of Arboriculture’s Best Management Practices (BMPs). This assessment level is limited to observation of conditions and defects readily visible from the ground.

During Arborist Report field work, specific data was gathered for each tree including the tree’s species, Diameter Breast Height (DBH) and dripline radius. Utilizing this data, the tree’s overall structural condition and vigor were separately assessed ranging from excellent to poor based upon the observed characteristics noted within the tree and the Arborist’s best professional judgment. Notable characteristics were documented and recommendations on a tree-by-tree basis were recorded and are presented in the Arborist Report Tree Inventory Spreadsheet (see Appendix A). Recommendations are based on the understanding that trees would be introduced into a developed roadway environment and may require maintenance and/or may not be suitable for retention within the post-Project development setting.

A total of 64 trees were inventoried and evaluated for structural integrity, health or risk concerns, and their approximate location to proposed road improvements. As part of this effort, a total of 46 trees were found to be protected trees as defined by the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance. The City of Roseville defines a Protected Tree as any native oak tree equal to or greater than 6 inches diameter DBH, measured as a total of a single trunk or multiple trunks. The purpose of the field reconnaissance effort was to inventory, identify, and comment on the current structure and vigor of trees located within and/or overhanging the Project site. Based on the Arborist assessment, a total of 45 trees located within the existing center median are recommended for removal. Of these, 37 are protected native oak trees with a combined DBH of 446 inches. See Arborist Report Appendix A - Tree Disposition Map (contained herewith as Initial Study Appendix A) for the location of trees currently identified for removal.

Consistent with the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance (Roseville Municipal Code Ch. 19.66) and as further discussed in the biological resources section, a determination regarding removal of the balance of Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-2 2021-260
protected trees would be made by the City Arborist (or designee) during construction after required critical roots are exposed for visual examination. At that time, the Project Arborist would determine if removal is warranted based on the extent of impact, health of the tree, and related safety and future maintenance considerations. Any tree removals identified during construction would be added to the Project’s tree permit and mitigated consistent with City ordinance requirements. All recommended mitigation measures presented in this Initial Study for protected trees would be implemented by the City as part of the Project, conform to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance, include special provisions for work within a tree’s protected zone, and include a replacement ratio of 1 inch DBH of tree replaced for each one inch DBH of tree removed (1:1 ratio).

2.5.1.2 Signal Modifications and Pedestrian Curb Ramp ADA Improvements Minor modifications to traffic signal pole placement would be implemented where necessary to accommodate proposed road widening, turn lane, and restriping improvements. Signal light timing would also be adjusted to optimize intersection LOS operations throughout the Project limits. In addition, any non-conforming City owned pedestrian crosswalk curb ramps would be reconstructed consistent with ADA requirements.

2.5.1.3 Left Turn Lane Adjustments – Configuration and Storage Modifications The following adjustments to existing left-turn lane configuration and storage would be implemented to improve intersection operations:

Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard Intersection.

Storage capacity of the westbound left-turn lane would be maintained by shortening the eastbound leftturn pocket at Birkdale Drive. As the turn lanes are back-to-back, this would be an improved allocation of storage to better suit the demands for each movement.

Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Country Club Drive Intersection The westbound left-turn pocket would be extended from 290 to 350 feet to better accommodate morning and afternoon peak traffic queues.

Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Foothills Boulevard Intersection Additional westbound left-turn storage would be installed within the existing Pleasant Grove Boulevard median and by widening to the north, which also accommodates the additional third lane. As shown in Figure 2-3, the ultimate proposed improvements would provide left-turn storage of 450, 800, and 800 feet for left-turn lanes 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-3 2021-260

2.5.1.4 Side street Stop-Sign-Controlled intersections– Left Turn Movement Modifications
The following three side street stop-sign-controlled intersections within the Project Limits would be modified to provide right-in, right-out, and left-in turn movements.  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Birkdale Drive/Retreat Way  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Laporte Drive/Hemingway Drive  Pleasant Grove Boulevard & Misty Wood Drive
Under existing conditions, full turning movements are currently allowed at the above existing side street stop-sign-controlled intersections. However, as shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-3, existing left-turn and through movements at the above intersections would be restricted by a proposed center median. The center median is required to conform with City policy prohibiting left turns or through movements across an unsignalized 6-lane roadway. Thus, right turns out onto westbound Pleasant Grove Boulevard and left and right turns into these neighborhood side streets from Pleasant Grove Boulevard would be allowed for motorists exiting and entering these neighborhoods. Eastbound vehicles exiting these neighborhoods would turn right and head west to the first available signalized intersection to make a U-turn and then proceed east on Pleasant Grove Boulevard.

2.5.1.5 Grading and Excavation
Grading would be allowed only as necessary to construct the Project within designated work areas. Most grading/excavation would not exceed four to five feet Below Ground Surface (BGS). Exceptions include trenching and drilling for utility relocations/extensions and to reset traffic signal poles following road widening. Utility relocations are described below and would require trenching up to 9 feet BGS and signal poles would require drilling up to 16 feet BGS.

Construction of the Project would require the excavation of existing asphalt concrete, base material, concrete pavement, and miscellaneous concrete and in-situ soils. Excess material is anticipated and would become the property of the Contractor. Excavated material would be reused on the Project Site to the extent feasible, would be kept out of private property, and out of the City storm drain system and surface waters by implementing construction BMPs.

2.5.1.6 Water Quality Treatment Basins
To address post-construction stormwater treatment, the Project will include design elements that are consistent with and implement requirements of the West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual (City of Roseville April 2016) adopted by the City on May 5, 2016, or the most current version.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-4 2021-260

2.5.1.7 Utility Relocations, Extensions, and Adjustments The Project includes relocation of existing utilities that conflict with proposed road widening. This includes adjusting lids to grade throughout the Project as necessary to conform with grading and newly paved areas, and the following:
 Relocation of an existing Roseville Electric utility box currently located on the north side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard approximately 870 feet east of Foothills Boulevard to the north of planned road widening.
 Utility extensions (i.e., water, storm drain, electric and fiber) shown on Figure 2-3 (Planned Utility Crossing) necessary to serve a planned City groundwater well located on the north side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard west of Misty Wood Park, and
 Adjustments to existing storm drain facilities located within landscape medians to conform to the widened road.
 Relocation of the recycled water line along the north side of Pleasant Grove Boulevard just east of Foothills Blvd.

2.5.1.8 Right-of-Way Acquisition
With one exception, all proposed improvements are within the City-owned right-of-way. The sole exception is at the northeast corner of the Foothills Boulevard intersection, where private property acquisition is required to accommodate approximately 950-linear feet of widening of the existing right-ofway by approximately 13.7 feet (or 13,000 square feet).

2.6 Construction Schedule and Approach
Project construction is scheduled for spring 2023 and is expected to take 10 months to complete.

Construction activities would take place mostly between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, in compliance with the City noise ordinance (RMC Ch. 9.24). In order to minimize the disruption to the morning and afternoon peak hours, limited nighttime work will be allowed where it results in reduced construction traffic congestion (for example, at the intersection of Foothills and Pleasant Grove boulevards). The general construction phases, duration, and associated activities are identified in Table 2-1. It is anticipated that portions of Phases 2 and 3 would overlap and include concurrent construction activity. Prior to construction, mobilization of equipment and supplies, as discussed below under Construction BMPs, the first order of work would include establishment of construction limits and installation of protections (i.e., temporary construction fencing) for any identified onsite Environmentally Sensitive Areas.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-5 2021-260
Table 2-1. Construction Phasing
Phase Duration
(Months) Activity
Phase 1 – Pre-construction activities,
mobilization and site layout
2 Establish control points, survey, and field stake construction limits. Install environmental sensitive fencing and employ pre-construction BMPs. Clear and establish staging areas and temporary construction access roads.

Mobilize heavy equipment, receive, and stockpile
construction equipment and supplies.

Phase 2 – Grading, Underground
Construction, and Tree Removal
2 Clear, grub, and remove vegetation and trees pre-approved for removal from work area. Conduct initial road grading activities, construct below-ground utility extensions and drainage facilities. Establish final road grades and fill slope limits.

Phase 3 – Construct road and
landscape improvements
4 Reconstruct median curb to conform with road widening, install erosion control drainage facilities; lay aggregate base and pavement. Construct traffic signal modifications,
pavement delineation and signage. Reconstruct irrigation to conform to new center median, plant trees and install
landscaping.

Phase 4 – Construction closure
activities
2 Clean up, restore temporarily disturbed areas, demobilize, open roadway.

2.6.1 Equipment and Materials Staging Area
Following establishment of environmental site controls, construction equipment and supplies would mobilize to the site. The contractor may also establish a temporary construction trailer for onsite contractor administrative functions. During construction, any contractor trailer and all equipment and materials would be stored within the designated Construction Staging Area shown on Figure 2-4 or at an alternative location to be established and environmentally cleared by the Contractor and approved by the City.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-6 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Figure 2-

4. Staging Area
2021-260 Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-2 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-1 2021-260
The Contractor would be responsible for obtaining all permits and rights for any staging area established as part of the Project. Depending on the construction phase, expected onsite equipment could include but is not limited to some combination of equipment listed in Table 2-2 plus hand operated equipment.

Table 2-2. Construction Equipment List
Equipment Potential Uses
Excavator General earthwork, roadway excavation and drainage Grader General earthwork and roadway sub-grade preparation and structural section construction
Water trucks Dust control and moisture conditioning of subgrade and base Roller/compactor General earthwork, backfill and structural section construction Backhoe/trenching machine Excavations
Concrete trucks/concrete
pumps
Concrete flatwork, drainage elements, foundations, and piles Dump trucks Hauling materials on and off site
Flatbed trucks Delivering construction materials and equipment Pickup trucks Personnel access
Cranes/forklifts Moving construction equipment and materials Paving Machine Paving

2.6.2 Construction Best Management Practices
The City and its contractor would implement construction BMPs to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive biological, cultural, and water resources, including adjacent vernal pool preserve areas. As discussed below, construction BMPs would include implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) consistent with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. SWPPP measures would minimize the potential for construction-related surface water pollution and ensure water quality is not compromised by erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. While Project construction is not expected to require surface water diversion, should conditions require, any water diversion would be installed in accordance with the provisions outlined in California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) Construction Site Best Management Practices for Clear Water Diversion (Fact Sheet NS-5).

The following BMPs would be included in the Project specifications and implemented by the contractor as part of the Project.

BMP 1: Temporary Fencing. The City’s contractor shall install construction barrier fencing (including sediment fencing and straw wattles) to prevent contaminants and debris from entering waterways, or adjacent vernal pool preserve areas. Before construction begins, the City or its contractor shall identify the locations for the barrier fencing and mark those locations with stakes or flagging.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-2 2021-260
BMP 2: SWPPP. A SWPPP shall be implemented as part of the NPDES Permit and a General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit to minimize the potential for sediments or contaminants to enter waterways.

BMP 3: Equipment Contaminants. The City shall comply with applicable stormwater ordinances, stormwater management plans, and BMPs to prevent or minimize the potential release of equipment-related petroleum contaminants into surface waters and groundwater.

Implementation of standard construction procedures and precautions for working with petroleum and construction chemicals would further ensure that the impacts related to chemical handling during project construction would be minor.

BMP 4: Debris/Demolition. Construction of the proposed project would require the demolition and excavation of existing asphalt concrete, base material, concrete pavement, and miscellaneous concrete and in-situ soils. Excess material is anticipated and would become the property of the Contractor. To the extent feasible, excavated material would be re-used on the Project site, subject to approval by project inspectors.

BMP 5: Erosion Control. The project design shall incorporate permanent erosion control elements to ensure that stormwater runoff does not cause soil erosion. Erosion and sediment control plans would be prepared consistent with the City’s Grading Ordinance, which requires reducing erosion and retaining sediment onsite.

BMP 6: Toxic Materials Control and Spill Response Plan. The following measures shall be incorporated into Project construction documents and implemented by the contractor to avoid or minimize the risk of spills or discharges of toxic materials into waterways.  Prepare a hazardous material Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCCP) before construction that shall be implemented during construction.  Prevent raw cement, concrete or concrete washings, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances that could be hazardous to aquatic life from contaminating the soil or entering waterways.  Prevent discharge of drilling mud and/or fluids into the waterways by using appropriate containment, disposal, and storage methods.  Prevent discharge of turbid water or sediment-laden runoff to the waterways by using sediment filters, diverting the water to a settling tank, and/or implementing other erosion and water quality control BMPs to ensure compliance with water quality requirements prior to discharging water back to the waterways.  Clean up all spills immediately according to the SPCCP.  Provide areas located outside the ordinary high water mark for staging and storing equipment, materials, fuels, lubricants, solvents, and other possible contaminants.  Remove vehicles from the normal high-water area before any refueling and lubricating to prevent contaminants from being discharged to the waterways during Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-3 2021-260
storm runoff. Contaminated water would be pumped to a holding tank for proper disposal.
 The construction contractor shall notify the City of Roseville Fire Department if evidence of soil or groundwater contamination is encountered during construction activities. Construction in that area shall be halted until the Fire Department has evaluated the find and remediation is completed, if necessary.  The construction contractor shall comply with the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards for the storage and handling of fuels, flammable materials, and common construction-related hazardous materials and for fire prevention (California Labor Code, Division 5, Chapter 2.5).

BMP 7: Traffic Management Plan. The City shall require the construction contractor to implement a Traffic Management Plan, including a construction schedule and plan to meet the City’s notice procedures before construction activities are initiated. This plan will identify general methods by which construction activities will be managed to minimize substantial delays to traffic. The traffic management plan shall include the following elements:

Communication: Develop and implement a public information campaign that describes the duration of the lane closures and recommends alternative routes. Particular attention shall be placed on special events (e.g., school graduations or Placer County Fairgrounds) that may attract unfamiliar users to the City’s roadway system. The City Public Information Office shall also continue a public outreach program using various media sources throughout construction.

Wayfinding: Position and operate changeable message sign trailers and locate pedestrian signage at strategic locations to advise the traveling public of construction activities and temporary lane reductions and suggest alternate routes.

Emergency Vehicle Response: The City Public Works Department shall coordinate with the City Police and Fire Departments to ensure potential effects of temporary lane closures on emergency response have been addressed, including emergency vehicle routing, temporary changes in fire station servicing areas, and emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections.

BMP 8: Noise Control Measures. The following measures shall be incorporated into the Project construction specifications to reduce and control noise generated by construction-related activities:
 All construction equipment shall have sound-control devices no less effective than those provided on the original equipment.
 No equipment shall have an unmuffled exhaust.
 Stationary construction equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive uses; sensitive uses shall be identified on construction drawings; and excessive Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-4 2021-260
equipment idling (greater than five minutes) shall be prohibited when the equipment is not in use.

2.6.2.1 City of Roseville Mitigating Ordinances, Guidelines, and Standards As identified in the General Plan, the following ordinances, guidelines, and standards would be applied to the Project as applicable to reduce environmental impacts.  Noise Regulation (Roseville Municipal Code [RMC] Ch.9.24)  Urban Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (RMC Ch.14.20)  Stormwater Quality Design Manual (Resolution 07-432)
 City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards (Resolution 07-137)  Community Design Guidelines (Resolution 95-347)
 Tree Ordinance (RMC Ch. 19.66)

2.7 Regulatory Requirements, Permits, and Approvals
The City of Roseville is the CEQA Lead Agency for the proposed Project. To approve Project construction, the City Council must first comply with CEQA by adopting the IS/MND. The City Council could then consider the information contained in the IS/MND in making its decision to approve or deny the Project, approve the construction plans, and file a Notice of Determination with the State Clearinghouse.

The Project does not include federal funding, is not subject to the National Environmental Policy Act, and would not impact waters of the U.S. or State or any threatened or endangered plant or wildlife species.

Thus, the Project is not expected to require permitting by any State or Federal resource agency acting in the capacity of a Responsible Agency under CEQA.

2.8 Consultation with California Native American Tribe(s) Assembly Bill (AB) 52 requires that prior to the release of a CEQA document for a project, an agency begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project if:

1. the California Native American tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the Lead Agency through formal notification of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribe; and,

2. the California Native American tribe responds in writing, within 30 days of receipt of the formal notification, and requests the consultation. The City of Roseville notified United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC), Tsi Akim Maidu, Ione Band of Miwok Indians, and the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians of the proposed Project on July 13, 2021.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-5 2021-260
A single response dated August 4, 2021 was received from the UAIC. In their response, UAIC declined formal AB52 tribal consultation but did request certain mitigation measures previously agreed to with the City that address unanticipated discovery of potential tribal cultural resources be included in the Initial Study Tribal Cultural Resources section. Further information on potential Tribal Cultural Resources in the Project Area, including a UAIC requested Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) mitigation measure (TCR-1), is provided in Section 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources of this IS/MND.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2-6 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 3-2 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-1 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Aesthetics

4.1.1 Environmental Setting

4.1.1.1 Regional Setting
State Scenic Highways
The California Scenic Highway Program protects and enhances the scenic beauty of California’s highways and adjacent corridors. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) can designate a highway as scenic based on how much natural beauty can be seen by users of the highway, the quality of the scenic landscape, and if development impacts the enjoyment of the view.

According to the GPU EIR, there are no designated or eligible state scenic highways within or near the City of Roseville, and the City of Roseville is not visible from any officially designated or eligible state scenic highway.

4.1.1.2 Local Setting
Roseville 2035 General Plan
As discussed in the GPU EIR, the City of Roseville does not have any locally designated scenic highways.

Thus, scenic highways are not analyzed in the GPU EIR.

4.1.1.3 Visual Character of the Project Site
Roseville and its environs are generally characterized as a transitional zone between the Central Valley’s flat terrain and the Sierra Nevada foothills. On clear days, long-range views in the project vicinity include the Sierra Nevada to the east, the Sutter Buttes to the north, and the Coast Ranges to the west. The Project site lies within the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan, a primarily built and urbanized area of Roseville. Lands adjacent the Project site consist primarily of commercial, office, residential, recreational, and open space uses. Commercial development is concentrated at the northwest corner of the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard intersection and at the southwest corner of the Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Foothills Boulevard intersection. Commercial and office uses exist south of Pleasant Grove Boulevard between Foothills Boulevard on the west and the Union Pacific Railroad on the east.

Open space uses exist north and south of Pleasant Grove Boulevard between Country Club Drive and Misty Wood Drive and Misty Wood Park exists north of Pleasant Grove Boulevard just west of Misty Wood Drive. Portions of the Woodcreek Oaks Golf Course, located north of Pleasant Grove Boulevard between Country Club Drive and Laporte Drive, are also visible to Pleasant Grove Boulevard travelers.

Pleasant Gove Boulevard within the Project area includes ornamental trees, native oak trees and shrub plantings within both the over-sized center median (designed to accommodate proposed road widening) and adjacent roadside landscape areas. The adjacent landscape areas also accommodate Class 1 Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-2 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
meandering pedestrian paths. The Pleasant Grove Boulevard center median and roadside landscape areas contain mature trees and shrubs. At the time Pleasant Grove Boulevard was constructed, existing native oaks trees were retained within these landscape areas. As a result, several oaks are now of substantial size and incompatible with proposed road widening.

The primary viewer groups that have views of the Project area include office and commercial center employees, shoppers, and nearby residents, including commuters accessing Highway 65 and Interstate 80 via Pleasant Grove Boulevard. Because Pleasant Grove Boulevard is an existing 4-lane arterial road, the Project segment includes existing streetlights, traffic signals and glare from vehicle headlights.

4.1.2 Aesthetics (I) Environmental Checklist and Discussion Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
a) have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes there are no scenic vistas within the Planning Area, nor is the Planning Area visible from any scenic vista; therefore, new development within the Planning Area would have a less-thansignificant impact on scenic vistas.

As discussed in the GPU EIR, no scenic vistas are located within the City’s Planning Area and thus there are no scenic vistas within the Project limits. Furthermore, the proposed widening Project between Foothills Boulevard and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard is consistent with the General Plan’s adopted CIP Program and therefore was anticipated by and evaluated in the GPU EIR. Thus, the Project is adequately addressed in the GPU EIR, there would be no new impact to scenic vistas and no mitigation is required.

Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes there is no designated or eligible state scenic highway within or in close proximity to the City’s Planning Area, and the Planning Area is not visible from any officially designated or eligible state or locally designated scenic highway. Furthermore, the City of Roseville does not have any locally designated scenic highways. Thus, the Project is adequately addressed by the GPU EIR and there would be no new impact to scenic resources and no mitigation is required.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-3 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views
of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are
those that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the Project is in an
urbanized area, would the Project conflict with
applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes that, buildout of the General Plan would include development and public infrastructure and facilities that would change the existing visual character of the Planning Area.

Implementation of General Plan policies, along with adherence to the City’s Community Design Standards, as well as the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code, and other adopted plans, would ensure the continuation of high-quality design and preservation of open space such that the General Plan would not conflict with applicable zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality. However, the change in existing visual character from undeveloped open space and agricultural land to developed urban land was found to be a significant and unavoidable impact by the GPU EIR.

Project construction activities would introduce heavy equipment, including backhoes, bulldozers, excavators, and/or similar machinery into the viewshed of all viewer groups, creating temporary effects on views of and from the Project site during construction. These activities would be visible from ground-level and elevated vantages. However, the visual effects of construction activities would not conflict with zoning or other regulations governing scenic quality because of their temporary character and the transience of viewers passing by the project site. Thus, there would be no new impact and no mitigation is required.

The Project is located in an urbanized area, along an existing road, and would be subject to all City zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. For example, the Project is required to comply with the following which are intended to provide high-quality design: Community Design Guidelines, Design & Construction Standards, the Northwest Roseville Specific Plan, and the City of Roseville Municipal Code, including Chapter 19.66 Tree Preservation which requires inch per inch replacement for any regulated native oak tree removed. Implementation of related zoning and policy measures would ensure continuation of high-quality design and the preservation of visual character and quality. Thus, although the Project requires landscape median tree removal, the reconfigured median would be replanted with appropriately sized trees and shrubs consistent with existing adopted City policy and regulation. There would be no new impact and no mitigation is required.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-4 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
d) Would the Project create a new source of
substantial light or glare, which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR found that Planning Area buildout would create significant new sources of substantial light or glare which could adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. The GPU EIR concludes that it is not feasible to mitigate light and glare impacts completely without prohibiting the use of light in new development, and that no other feasible mitigation measures were available. Thus, the impact of creating a new source of light or glare was considered significant and unavoidable in the GPU EIR.

Proposed road widening would primarily occur into the center median of Pleasant Grove Boulevard, an arterial roadway with existing vehicle traffic/headlights and streetlights similar to other arterial roads in the City. Project improvements would be visually compatible with existing streetlights east and west of the Project segment, and would not create additional, substantial unnecessary light or glare, nor would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare in an area not already experiencing these conditions. Thus, there would be no new impact to light or glare which could adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area and the Project is adequately addressed by the GPU EIR. No new mitigation is required.

4.1.3 Mitigation Measures
No new impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required.

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources

4.2.1 Environmental Setting
According to the California Department of Conservation online Important Farmland Finder Map (https:/conservation.ca.gov/maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/Al, 2016), the Project site does not contain Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance nor is the site zoned for agriculture or forestry use or is under Williamson Act contract. The California Important Farmland Finder Map identifies the site as Urban and Built-Up Land.

The City’s Zoning Ordinance describes the permitted land uses and development standards for each of the designated zoning districts in the City on a parcel-by-parcel basis. The proposed Project is a road widening project and the Project site is designated Major Arterial by the General Plan Circulation Element and has no designation under the City of Roseville Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, the Planning Area does not contain existing City of Roseville zoning for forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-5 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260

4.2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources (II) Environmental Checklist and Discussion Would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes that buildout of the Plan Area would not convert Important Farmland to nonagricultural uses and no impact would occur.

As discussed above, the California Important Farmland Finder Map identifies the Project site as Urban and Built-Up Land. Thus, the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use. There would be no new impact and no mitigation is required.

Would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act contract?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR found that the Planning Area is not zoned for agricultural uses and no parcels are under Williamson Act contracts (Placer County 2020). Therefore, buildout of the General Plan, including the proposed Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project, would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract. No new impact would occur, and no mitigation is required.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-6 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
Would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526),
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
No New Impact
As discussed above, as a roadway, the Project site is not zoned nor does the City zoning ordinance include zone districts for forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)). Thus, Project implementation would not conflict with or cause the rezoning of any of the above zoning designations and there would be no new impact.

Would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
No New Impact
The proposed Project primarily involves road widening into an existing landscaped center median. The Project would not impact forest land or result in conversion of forest land to non-forest use. There would be no new impact and no mitigation is required.

Would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to
non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land
to non-forest use?
No New Impact
The proposed Project primarily involves road widening into an existing landscaped center median. The Project would not result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. There would be no new impact and no mitigation is required.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-7 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260

4.2.3 Mitigation Measures
No significant impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures are required.

4.3 Air Quality

4.3.1 Environmental Setting
The following section is derived from the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project (ECORP 2022a, Appendix B-1) The City of Roseville is located within Placer County. The California Air Resource Board (CARB) has divided California into regional air basins according to topographic features. The City of Roseville portion of Placer County is located in a region identified as Sacramento Valley Air Basin (SVAB). The SVAB is comprised of nine air districts. The air basin is bounded by the Coastal and Diablo Mountain ranges on the west, the Sierra Nevada to the east, and the San Joaquin Valley to the south. The environmental conditions of Placer County are conducive to potentially adverse air quality conditions. The basin area traps pollutants between two mountain ranges to the east and the west. This problem is exacerbated by a temperature inversion layer that traps air at lower levels below an overlying layer of warmer air. Prevailing winds in the area are generally from the south and southwest. Sea breezes flow over the San Francisco Bay Area and into the Sacramento Valley, transporting pollutants from the large urban areas. Growth and urbanization in Placer County have also contributed to an increase in emissions.

Both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and CARB have established ambient air quality standards for common pollutants. These ambient air quality standards are levels of contaminants representing safe levels that avoid specific adverse health effects associated with each pollutant. The ambient air quality standards cover what are called “criteria” pollutants because the health and other effects of each pollutant are described in criteria documents. The six criteria pollutants are ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead.

Areas that meet ambient air quality standards are classified as attainment areas, while areas that do not meet these standards are classified as nonattainment areas. The portion of Placer County encompassing the City of Roseville and the Project Site is designated as a nonattainment area for the federal O3 standards and is also a nonattainment area for the state standards for O3 and coarse particulate matter (PM10) (CARB 2019).

The local air quality regulating authority in Placer County is the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD). The PCAPCD is designated by law to adopt and enforce regulations to achieve and maintain ambient air quality standards. The PCAPCD responsibilities include preparing plans for the attainment of ambient air quality standards, adopting and enforcing air pollution rules, issuing permits for and inspecting stationary air pollution sources, responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, and implementing state and federal programs and regulations. The PCAPCD has also adopted various rules and regulations that are designed to reduce and control pollutant emissions from project’s construction and operational activities. The following provisions applicable to the proposed Project are summarized as follows:

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-8 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
 Rule 202 Visible Emissions: A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions whatsoever any air contaminant for a period or periods aggregating more than three (3) in any one (1) hour which is: a.) As dark or darker in shade as that designated as No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines, or b.) Of such opacity as to obscure an observer’s view to a degree equal to or greater than does smoke described in section (A) above.
 Rule 205 Nuisance: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which causes injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause to have a natural tendency to cause injury or damage to businesses or property.
 Rule 213 Transfer of Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers: The provisions of this rule shall apply to the transfer of gasoline into any stationary storage container.  Rule 214 Transfer of Gasoline into Vehicle Fuel Tanks: The provisions of this rule shall apply to the transfer of gasoline from any stationary storage tank into any motor vehicle fuel tank.  Rule 218 Architectural Coating: To limit the quantity of volatile organic compounds in architectural coating supplied, sold, offered for sale, applied, solicited for application, or manufactured for use within the District.
 Rule 228 Fugitive Dust: To reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air, or discharge into the ambient air, as a result of anthropogenic (manmade) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce, or mitigate fugitive dust emissions.  Rule 502 New Source Review: The purpose of this rule is to provide for the review of new and modified stationary air pollution sources and to provide mechanisms, including emission offsets, by which authorities to construct for such sources may be granted without interfering with the attainment or maintenance of ambient air quality standards.

4.3.2 Air Quality (III) Environmental Checklist and Discussion Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project:

New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes that long-term operational emissions would be generated from day-to-day activities associated with residential and non-residential land uses allowed under the General Plan.

Associated operational emissions were found to exceed applicable PCAPCD thresholds. Thus, the level of operational emissions could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-9 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
Even with implementation of all feasible General Plan policy and mitigation measures, this impact was considered significant and unavoidable by the GPU EIR.

As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the USEPA requires each state with nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the federal standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local plan components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution in nonattainment areas, using a combination of performance standards and market-based programs. Similarly, under state law, the California Clean Air Act requires an air quality attainment plan to be prepared for areas designated as nonattainment with regard to the federal and state ambient air quality standards. Air quality attainment plans outline emissions limits and control measures to achieve and maintain these standards by the earliest practical date.

The PCAPCD is the agency responsible for enforcing many federal and state air quality requirements and for establishing air quality rules and regulations. The PCAPCD attains and maintains air quality conditions in Placer County through a comprehensive program of planning, regulation, enforcement, technical innovation, and promotion of the understanding of air quality issues. As part of this effort, the PCAPCD has developed input to the SIP. The 2017 Sacramento Regional 2008 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan (including 2018 updates), the PM10 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and Re-Designation Request (SMAQMD 2010), and PM2.5 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for Sacramento PM2.5 Nonattainment Area (SMAQMD 2013) constitute the current SIP for the Placer County portion of the SVAB and include the PCAPCD’s plans and control measures for attaining air quality standards. These air quality attainment plans are a compilation of new and previously submitted plans, programs (e.g., monitoring, modeling, permitting), district rules, state regulations, and federal controls describing how the state will attain ambient air quality standards.

The SIP plans and control measures are based on information derived from projected growth in Placer County in order to project future emissions and then determine strategies and regulatory controls for the reduction of emissions. Growth projections are based on the general plans developed by Placer County and the incorporated cities in the county. As such, projects that propose development consistent with the growth anticipated by the respective general plan of the jurisdiction in which the proposed development is located would be consistent with the SIP. In the event that a project would propose a development that is less dense than that associated with the general plan, the project would likewise be consistent with the SIP. If a project, however, proposes a development that is denser than that assumed in the general plan, the project may be in conflict with the SIP and could therefore result in a significant impact on air quality.

Growth projections for Placer County in the Project area are based on the City of Roseville General Plan.

As such, projects in the city that propose development consistent with the growth anticipated by the General Plan would be consistent with PCAPCD’s air quality planning efforts. The Project does not include development of new housing or employment centers and would not induce population or employment growth. Rather, the Project seeks to address existing and future traffic deficiencies and improve circulation consistent with the City’s Transportation System 2035 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Therefore, the Project would not affect local plans for population growth and the proposed Project would be considered consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections utilized in the preparation of PCAPCD air quality planning efforts. Furthermore, as described in detail below, the Project would not Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-10 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
exceed the PCAPCD’s short-term construction or long-term operational thresholds and in turn would not violate any air quality standards, and thus would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment.

The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. No new impact would occur, and no additional mitigation is required.

Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the Project
New
Significant
Impact
Substantially
More Severe
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Additional
Mitigation
No
New
Impact
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard?
No New Impact
The GPU EIR concludes that generation of emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors could exceed an ambient air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or predicted air quality exceedance. Even with implementation of all feasible General Plan Policy and mitigation measures, this impact was found to be significant and unavoidable.

By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size, by itself, to result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s individual emissions exceed its identified significance thresholds, the project would be cumulatively considerable.

Projects that do not exceed significance thresholds would not be considered cumulative considerable.

Project construction emissions were modeled using the Roadway Construction Emissions Model (RCEM), version 9.0.0. RCEM is a spreadsheet-based model that is able to estimate exhaust emissions from heavyduty construction equipment, haul trucks, and worker commute trips as well as fugitive dust from the construction of a new roadway, road widening, roadway overpass, levee or pipeline projects.

The proposed Project improvements are intended to address existing and future traffic deficiencies and improve circulation consistent with the City’s Transportation System 2035 CIP. According to the Traffic Study prepared for the Project (Fehr & Peers 2022), the proposed Project itself would not generate automobile trips; but would instead increase the capacity in order to improve traffic operations. This would affect traffic patterns in the City. Therefore, potential impacts of the Project from mobile-source air quality emissions during the post-construction operations is evaluated based upon AM and PM peak hour vehicle idling times as provided by Fehr & Peers (Fehr & Peers. 2022). Emissions generated from automobile idling in the Project Limits are estimated with the use of the 2021 version of the EMission FACtor model (EMFAC). EMFAC 2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by CARB to predict changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources including Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-11 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
cars, trucks, and buses in California. EMFAC 2021 includes the latest data on automobile fleets and travel activity within Placer County.

Projected operational emissions associated with proposed post-construction operations are compared to the existing baseline, which includes the current operations accommodated by the segment of Pleasant Grove Boulevard beginning 1,500 feet east of Foothills Boulevard to 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. This segment encompasses the following facilities:
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard intersection (currently 43 – 35 seconds of delay per vehicle)
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Birkdale Drive-Retreat Way intersection (currently 79 – 268 seconds of delay per vehicle)
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Country Club Drive intersection (currently 10 – 20 seconds of delay per vehicle)
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Laporte Drive-Hemingway Drive intersection (currently 204 – >300 seconds of delay per vehicle)
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Misty Wood Drive intersection (currently 37 - 278 seconds of delay per vehicle)
 Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Foothills Boulevard intersection (currently 44 – 58 seconds of delay per vehicle)
In addition to identifying emissions associated with the overall post-construction operations, emissions generated by the expected seconds of delay (automobile idling) at each intersection are identified individually.

4.3.2.1 Construction Impacts
Emissions associated with Project construction would be temporary and short-term but have the potential to represent a significant air quality impact. Three basic sources of short-term emissions will be generated through construction of the proposed Project: operation of the construction vehicles (i.e., tractors, forklifts, pavers), the creation of fugitive dust during clearing and grading, and the use of asphalt or other oil-based substances during paving activities. Construction activities such as excavation and grading operations, construction vehicle traffic, and wind blowing over exposed soils would generate exhaust emissions and fugitive PM emissions that affect local air quality at various times during construction.

Effects would be variable depending on the weather, soil conditions, the amount of activity taking place, and the nature of dust control efforts.

Construction-generated emissions associated with the proposed Project were calculated using the RCEM model. Appendix B Air Quality provides more information regarding the construction assumptions, including construction equipment and duration, used in this analysis.

Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-12 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
Predicted maximum daily construction-generated emissions for the proposed Project are summarized in Table 4.3-1. Construction-generated emissions are short-term and of temporary duration, lasting only if construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the thresholds of significance.

Table 4.3-1. Construction-Related Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Description
Pollutant
(maximum pounds per day)
ROG NOX PM10
Grubbing/Land Clearing 2.30 18.52 10.85
Grading/Excavation 2.60 34.11 11.46
Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade & Paving 2.96 41.20 11.81
PCAPCD Potentially Significant Impact Threshold 82 82 82 Exceed PCAPCD Threshold? No No No
Source: RCEM version 9.0.0. Refer to Appendix B-1 for Model Data Outputs.

Notes: Emission calculations account for the import/export of 1,000 cubic yards of soil and asphalt material daily during the grading/excavation phase and the import/export of 2,000 cubic yards of soil and asphalt material daily during the drainage/utilities/subgrade and paving phase.

As shown in Table 4.3-1, emissions generated during Project construction would not exceed the PCAPCD’s thresholds of significance. Therefore, criteria pollutant emissions generated during Project construction would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Thus, there would be no new impact.

4.3.2.2 Operational Impacts
The proposed Project improvements are intended to address existing and future traffic deficiencies and improve circulation consistent with the City’s Transportation System 2035 CIP. According to the Traffic Study prepared for the Project (Fehr & Peers 2022), the proposed Project itself would not generate automobile trips; but would instead increase the capacity in order to improve traffic operations. This would affect traffic patterns in the city. Therefore, potential impacts of the Project from mobile-source air quality emissions during the post-construction operations is evaluated based upon AM and PM peak hour vehicle idling times as provided by Fehr & Peers (2022). Emissions generated from automobile idling in the Project Limits are estimated with the use of EMFAC 2021.

Projected operational emissions associated with proposed post-construction operations are compared to current operations accommodated by the segment of Pleasant Grove Boulevard beginning 1,500 feet east of Foothills Boulevard to 700 feet west of Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. Long-term operational emissions are identified in Table 4.3-2. In addition to identifying emissions associated with the overall postconstruction operations, emissions generated by the expected seconds of delay (automobile idling) at Draft Subsequent Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ECORP Consulting, Inc. 4-13 November 2022
Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project 2021-260
each intersection (Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard intersection, Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Birkdale Drive-Retreat Way intersection, Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Country Club Drive intersection, Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Laporte Drive-Hemingway Drive intersection, Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Misty Wood Drive intersection, and Pleasant Grove Boulevard/Foothills Boulevard intersection) are identified individually. To isolate the effects of the Project without any induced travel demand, the proposed Project turning traffic volumes used in this analysis are representative of the existing volumes applied to the proposed Project geometry. The difference between emissions generated under existing conditions and those generated under the Project are identified in Table 4.3-2 and compared to the regional operational significance thresholds promulgated by the PCAPCD.

← All documents from this meeting