AGENDA
July 17, 2024
CITY COUNCIL
6:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA
www.roseville.ca.us
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WELCOMES YOUR PARTICIPATION
If an agenda item is open to public comment, such public comment shall be addressed to the chair of the meeting.
Public Comment - Speakers have three minutes under Public Comment to speak on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City's jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda.
Consent Calendar - If applicable, the Consent Calendar consists of routine items that may be approved by one motion. Any person can remove an item from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately.
Agenda Items - Speakers have five minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.
Levine Act Provisions - The Levine Act requires a Party (or its agent (s)) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officers (including Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, and members of other City boards and commissions) totaling more than $250 within the 12 months before the City decision.
Americans with Disabilities Act - Notify the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance if special assistance is required to participate in a meeting including the need of auxiliary aids or services.
Audio/Visual Presentations - If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance.
Security procedures are in place to attend Roseville City Council meetings. All attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include, but are not limited to: firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/ any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs and alcohol.
Roseville City Clerk 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 916-774-5200 TDD 916-774-5220
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MEETING PROCEDURES
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS
6. CONSENT CALENDAR
BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
6.1. Minutes of Prior Meetings
Memo from City Clerk Technician Melissa Lipp and City Clerk Carmen Avalos recommending the City Council approve the minutes of the June 5, 2024 City Council Meeting, and June 19, 2024 City Council Meeting Closed Session, June 19, 2024 City Council Housing Authority Finance Authority Natural Gas Financing Authority Meeting.
CC #: 3459
File #: 0102-03
CONTACT: Melissa Lipp [email protected] 916-774-5268 Bids / Purchases / Services
6.2. Hall Park Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Park Planning & Development Superintendent Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-256 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE
AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3003671). Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc, for a not-to-exceed amount of $219,817.17, for the Hall Park play structure replacement. On March 14, 2024, staff sought public feedback for a new play structure at Hall Park. The outreach process included social media and onsite signage with a QR code inviting residents to review, comment and vote on the proposed play structure design. Through a two-week write-in period, feedback received was minimal. Nine comments were received and indicated general support with requests for shade and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) swing. The play structure design includes shade and an ADA swing was added to the swing area. The funding for this play structure replacement was approved by Council in the FY2023-24 Capital Improvement Program using the Parks, Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund.
Delivery of this play structure is expected in fall/winter 2024. Maintenance is funded by the General Fund and will not increase.
CC #: 3438
File #: 0704-01
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
6.3. Veterans Park (South) Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement
Memo from Park Planning & Development Superintendent Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-266 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE
AGREEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLAYPOWER LT
FARMINGTON, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3003672).
Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc, for a not-to-exceed amount of $151,750.83, for the Veterans Park (South) play structure replacement. On March 14, 2024, staff sought public feedback for a new play structure at Veterans Park (South). The outreach process included social media and onsite signage with a QR code inviting residents to review, comment and vote on the proposed play structure design. Through a two-week write-in period, one comment was received. The comment appreciated the military themed play structure and was supportive of the design. The funding for this play structure replacement was approved by Council in the FY2023-24 Capital Improvement Program using the Parks, Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund. Maintenance is funded by the General Fund and will not increase.
CC #: 3451
File #: 0704-01
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
6.4. Water Treatment Chemicals - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Power Generation Superintendent Nathan Ribordy and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-246 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE
AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
CHEMTREAT, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3003643).
Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with ChemTreat, Inc. for the Electric Generation Division. Equipment and services under this contract will be on an as-needed basis with a not-to-exceed amount of $250,000 per contract year. Funds are available in the Electric Department's FY2024-25 budget in the Electric Fund, and future funding will be included in the respective years’ budget requests for ongoing costs.
CC #: 3430
File #: 0203-07
CONTACT: Nathan Ribordy 916-746-1673 [email protected] Resolutions
6.5. Cash for Grass Program, Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project - Regional Water Authority Project Agreement
Memo from Water Conservation Administrator Bobby Alvarez and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-270 APPROVING A PROJECT
AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approval of the Project Agreement with the Regional Water Authority (RWA) to secure grant funding to augment the City’s water efficiency Cash for Grass rebate program to be offered to Roseville residents. The grant will provide access to $83,014 for additional Cash for Grass program rebates. No match fund contribution is required. There will be no net effect on the available resources in the Water Operations Fund since all costs will be reimbursed by RWA.
CC #: 3456
File #: 0800-02
CONTACT: Bobby Alvarez 916-746-1710 [email protected]
6.6. West Side Tanks and Pump Station Operations Crew Facility – Notice of Completion
Memo from Associate Engineer Rana Moore and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-268 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE WEST
SIDE TANKS AND PUMP STATION OPERATIONS CREW FACILITY
PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND
AUTHORIZING THE ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DIRECTOR TO
EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE.
Staff requests Council approval of the Notice of Completion for the West Side Tanks and Pump Station Operations Crew Facility Project. The total cost of the construction contract including all change orders was $3,159,518.53. The project was funded by the Water Construction Fund.
CC #: 3453
File #: 0900-02
CONTACT: Rana Moore 916-774-5581 [email protected]
6.7. Water Forum Successor Effort – Interagency Agreement for Cost Sharing for FY2024-25
Memo from Assistant Environmental Utilities Director Sean Bigley and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-267 APPROVING AN INTERAGENCY
AGREEMENT FOR COST-SHARING, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approval of the FY2024-25 interagency cost-sharing agreement for the City of Roseville’s continued support of the Water Forum Successor Effort. The $101,161 cost share for the City of Roseville is in the FY2024-25 Water Administration budget in the Water Operations Fund, which is funded by water utility rate revenue. Additionally, staff requests approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to approve future Water Forum cost sharing agreements based on specified conditions and upon recommendation by the City Attorney.
CC #: 3452
File #: 0800-02
CONTACT: Sean Bigley 916-774-5513 [email protected]
6.8. Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Jeremy Knuthson and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-265 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN
AS Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION," AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND
ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THOSE RESPECTIVE DEDICATIONS
OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAPS OF BOOK EE PAGE 6, AND
BOOK GG PAGE 55. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CC #: 3450
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected]
6.9. Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Jeremy Knuthson and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-259 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN
AS Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THOSE
RESPECTIVE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAPS
OF Campus Oaks. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CC #: 3442
File #: 0400-04-18
CONTACT: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected]
6.10.Campus Oaks CO-3 - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-245 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CAMPUS OAKS
CO-3, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE
SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON
THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CC #: 3428
File #: 0400-04-18
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]
6.11.Infill PCL 13 - 1028 Main Street Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement
Memo from Associate Engineer Jeff Hendrix and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council approve the infill PCL 13 - 1028 Main Street Subdivision Final Map and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and right of way offered thereon; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-257 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE 10,
LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve the Subdivision Agreement with Roseville 10, LLC, the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and right of way. The Engineering Division has completed its review of the final map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 10 residential lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.
CC #: 3439
File #: 0400-04-17-2 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Jeff Hendrix 916-774-5463 [email protected]
6.12.Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A Project - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Jeremy Knuthson and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-264 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN
AS Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A - Improvement Plan PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND
ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE
RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CC #: 3449
File #: 0400-04-09-1
CONTACT: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected]
6.13.Campus Oaks CO-2 - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-244 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CAMPUS OAKS
CO-2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE
SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON
THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
CC #: 3427
File #: 0400-04-18
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]
6.14.Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 2 Subdivision – Final Map and Subdivision Agreement
Memo from Associate Engineer Jeff Hendrix and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon, and accept subject to improvement, Lots A and B, and the rights of way offered thereon, and approve the abandonment of the easements as listed; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-263 APPROVING A
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff also requests approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 - Phase 2 final map. Staff has completed its review of the final map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 78 residential lots, a landscape lot (Lot A) and 1 lot for park purposes (Lot B). The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.
CC #: 3448
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Jeff Hendrix 916-774-5463 [email protected]
6.15.Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement
Memo from Associate Engineer Edward Winston and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council approve the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 final map and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and maintenance access easement, and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-262 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT,
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER
CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and maintenance access easement offered thereon and accept, subject to improvement, Lots A, B, C, and D, the rights of way, and all easements offered thereon; and approve the abandonment of the right of way and easements as listed thereon; and approve the Subdivision Agreement. The Development Services Department, Engineering Division, has completed its review of the final map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 78 residential lots, 3 public landscape lots, 1 lot for storm drain purposes, and 2 future development lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.
CC #: 3447
File #: 0400-04-012-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Edward Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected]
6.16.Roseville Old Town Lofts Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Memo from Assistant Engineer Robert Medina and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-261 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND C & P DEVELOPMENT LLC, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and approve the Roseville Old Town Lofts final map. The Engineering Division has completed its review of the final map and found that it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 22 residential lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.
CC #: 3445
File #: 0401-02-02 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Robert Medina 916-774-5517 [email protected]
6.17.Fiscal Year 2024-25 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Grant Agreements
Memo from Housing Analyst Suzanne Acrell and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24- 247 APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND AMI HOUSING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-248 APPROVING A GRANT
AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING
SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 24-249 APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR
HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE GATHERING INN, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-250 APPROVING A
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AND THE SALVATION ARMY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 24-251 APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR
HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND NORTHERN NEVADA, INC., AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve and authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute agreements with ASK (Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Saint Vincent de Paul, Kids First) in the amount of $400,000, Latino Leadership Council in the amount of $35,000, The Gathering Inn in the amount of $80,000, Salvation Army in the amount of $25,000, and Volunteers of America in the amount of $75,000 for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing services. The Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing grant program is funded with $250,000 of Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund resources and $384,070 in State of California Permanent Local Housing Allocation funding. The recommended actions will not result in costs to the City's General Fund. CC #: 3431
File #: 0709-02
CONTACT: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected]
6.18.Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program Assistance - Professional Services Agreement
Memo from Management Analyst Daniel Leonardich and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-254 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MERAKISIS LLC, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a professional services agreement with Merakisis, LLC for assistance related to the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Grant. The consultant will provide support in citywide Electric Vehicle (EV) charging location, infrastructure analysis, and selection; request for proposals and selection of a service provider; grant writing and submission process for the CFI Grant Program; and project management of EV charging improvements at selected locations. The consultant will assist in developing a comprehensive proposal that aligns with the objectives and criteria outlined in the grant program. The total Merakisis contract amount shall not exceed $600,000, which is six percent (6%) of a potential $10,000,000 grant award. Merakisis shall only be compensated upon successful award of a CFI grant to the City, upon which they will be compensated up to 6% of the awarded and completed grant project amount. Should no grant be awarded, Merakisis will not receive compensation. No City funds, beyond the 6% of an awarded CFI grant, are being requested for this agreement.
CC #: 3435
File #: 0800-02 & 0214
CONTACT: Daniel Leonardich 916-774-5341 [email protected]
6.19.Western Area Power Administration, Transmission Service Request – Letter of Agreement
Memo from Electric Resource Planner Brian Schinstock and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-269 APPROVING A LETTER OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF ROSEVILLE AND UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approval of a Letter of Agreement 23- SNR-03000 with the United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power Administration to perform studies and determine the possible necessary system additions and upgrades required to increase Roseville’s import capacity from 295 MW to 450 MW and authorize the City Manager to execute it. The estimated cost of the studies is $60,000. There is no fiscal impact as the cost of the studies is included in the Electric Fund budget.
CC #: 3455
File #: 0800-03
CONTACT: Brian Schinstock 916-746-1658 [email protected] Ordinances (for introduction and adoption - appropriation/urgency measures)
6.20.Dry Creek Greenway East Trail, Phase 2 Project - Budget Adjustment Memo from Associate Transportation Planner Suzanne Engelke and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6832 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO
THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS
ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approval for a budget adjustment in the amount of $2,000,000 for engineering and environmental permitting services for the Dry Creek Greenway East Trail, Phase 2 project. The Phase 2 project is an extension of the Phase 1 trail project and runs approximately
1.5 miles from Rocky Ridge Drive to Old Auburn Road in Roseville. The recommended budget adjustment will appropriate $2,000,000 of Local Transportation Funds and increase the total project budget to $2,515,000. No General Fund resources will be used for this project.
CC #: 3429
File #: 0900-04 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Suzanne Engelke 916-746-1289 [email protected]
6.21.Public Works Administration and Engineering Office Tenant Improvement Project – Capital Improvement Project Approval and Budget Adjustment Memo from Management Analyst Daniel Leonardich and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6838 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project – Public Works Administration and Engineering Office Tenant Improvement Project and approve a budget adjustment appropriating $250,000 from the General Fund Contingency budget to fully fund the first phase of the project. The existing space lacks offices for two existing management positions. The tenant improvement will include the design, engineering and construction to build two new offices for these positions as a first phase, and to construct a future phase of work to address the function and utilization of the existing conference room within the Public Works area of the Civic Center, as funding allows.
CC #: 3444
File #: 0900-04 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Daniel Leonardich 916-774-5341 [email protected]
6.22.Martha Riley Library Facilities Rehabilitation - Budget Adjustment Memo from Management Analyst Daniel Leonardich and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6835 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $556,686 to augment the budget for the cost of the contract, staff time, and contingency for work on the FY2021-22 Riley Library - Facilities Rehabilitation Project, which will replace the end-of-life climate control system for one of the City's facilities which houses vital equipment. The recommended budget adjustment totaling $556,686 will bring the revised project budget to $900,095 and be funded primarily by the Facility Rehabilitation Fund ($486,911), which receives its funding from the General Fund. Other funding sources include the Water Rehabilitation Fund ($11,634), Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund ($11,620), Solid Waste Rehabilitation Fund ($11,634), and the Electric Fund ($34,887).
CC #: 3437
File #: 0900-04 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Daniel Leonardich 916-774-5341 [email protected]
6.23.Staffing Changes
Memo from Human Resource Manager Macy Dippert and Human Resource Director Stacey Peterson recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6840 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6797, THE SALARY
ORDINANCE FOR SEASONAL/TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES, AS
AMENDED BY APPENDIX “U” TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 27, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6841 AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 6806, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR EMPLOYEES
REPRESENTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING
ENGINEERS, STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “D” TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 27, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6842 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6807, THE SALARY ORDINANCE FOR MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES, AS AMENDED BY APPENDIX “D” TO BE EFFECTIVE
JULY 27, 2024, AS AN URGENCY MEASURE. As part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community, staff recommends that the City Council approve the Temporary salary schedule reflecting the addition of a Therapeutic Recreation Program Leader classification and the Local 39 A & B salary schedule to reflect the title changes of Passport/Livescan Agent to Passport Agent, Utility Billing Customer Service Field Representative I/II to Utility Customer Service Field Representative I/II, Senior Utility Billing Customer Service Field Representative to Senior Utility Customer Service Field Representative, Warehouse Worker I/II to Inventory Control and Supply Worker I/II, and Senior Warehouse Worker to Inventory Control and Supply Technician classifications. Also recommended are updates to the Management A & B salary schedules reflecting the addition of an Assistant Public Works Director classification, and updates to the city allocation schedule that includes the addition of one (1) Assistant Public Works Director position and deletion of two (2) positions. There is no fiscal impact since the staffing updates were included in the FY2024-25 budget.
CC #: 3454
File #: 0600-01
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected]
6.24.Lead and Copper Rule Revisions and Technical Assistance Project – Professional Services Agreement Amendment and Budget Adjustment Memo from Principal Engineer Janice Gainey and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-258 APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND HDR ENGINEERING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6836 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND
DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a first amendment to the professional services agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. for the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions and Technical Assistance in the amount of $72,441. The amendment will increase the total not-to-exceed amount to $173,086 for strategic communications plan and public outreach support. Staff also requests approval of a budget adjustment of $72,441 from the Water Operations Fund to fund the amendment.
CC #: 3441
File #: 0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]
6.25.2024 Potable Water Master Plan and Hydraulic Model Update – Sole Source Professional Services Agreement and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Principal Engineer Janice Gainey and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-252 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT,
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND WEST YOST &
ASSOCIATES, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6833 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO
THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS
ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approval and award of a sole source professional services agreement with West Yost in the amount of $916,607 for the 2024 Potable Water Master Plan and Hydraulic Model Update Project. West Yost has extensive institutional knowledge of the City’s water systems gained from over 17 years of working with the water utility on a large variety of projects. Between 2007 and 2023, West Yost conducted various hydraulic modeling and infrastructure analysis including a system-wide model update project, emergency interties modeling, an evaluation of the Pressure Zone 4, Critical Dry Year Water Supply and Infrastructure Assessment, Hydraulic Capacity Evaluation of the West Side Tank and Pump Station, the Atlantic Street Railroad Pipe Crossings, new development modeling support, as well as overall general modeling support. Through these multiple projects, West Yost has developed an in-depth understanding of the City’s complex water distribution system. Given that it would require a significant amount of time for another consultant to come up to speed to fully understand the complexities of the Roseville Water System, and given the knowledge West Yost has developed over the years, it will consequently allow them to complete this project in a very timely manner. Environmental Utility staff’s recommendation is to sole source this effort to West Yost as the most efficient and best value to the City. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $260,000 from the Water Construction Fund to fully fund the contract and provide for staff time.
CC #: 3432
File #: 0800-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Janice Gainey 916-774-5535 [email protected]
6.26.Sanitary Sewer Manhole Access Assessment Project – Non-Capital Multi-Year Project Approval and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Senior Engineer Arashdeep Singh and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6839 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL
YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff recommends that Council authorize the establishment of a new non-capital multiyear project, the Sanitary Sewer Manhole Access Assessment Project, and adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment appropriating $100,000 using available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.
CC #: 3446
File #: 0900-02
CONTACT: Arashdeep Singh 916-746-1854 [email protected]
6.27.Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Motor Control Center and Switchgear Replacement Project – Design-Build Construction Agreement Amendment, Change Order Authorization, and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Preventative Maintenance Supervisor Jeremy Snyder and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-255 APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO
DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN
AUBURN CONSTRUCTORS, LLC AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6834 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE.
Staff requests Council approval of a design-build agreement amendment with Auburn Constructors, and authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to approve change orders for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Motor Control Center and Switchgear Replacement Design-Build Project. The designbuild agreement amendment will add $237,381, for a total agreement price of $7,643,681. The authorization to approve change orders would allow the designbuild agreement total to increase by no more than $200,000 or 2.6%. Staff also requests a budget adjustment in the amount of $300,000, for a new project total budget of $8,206,300. Funding for this project, including the recommended budget adjustment, is provided by available resources in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund. As a regional wastewater project, the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund will be reimbursed for approximately 35 percent of the project’s actual cost from the City's partners, the South Placer Municipal Utility District and Placer County.
CC #: 3436
File #: 0900-02-02-01 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Jeremy Snyder 916-746-1829 [email protected]
6.28.Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent Pump Station Rehabilitation Project – Design-Build Construction Agreement Amendment, Change Order Authorization, and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Preventative Maintenance Supervisor Jeremy Snyder and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-260 APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO
DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN
SYBLON REID AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND AUTHORIZING
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6837 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET AND
DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approval of a design-build agreement amendment with Syblon Reid for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Influent Pump Station Rehabilitation Design-Build Project adding $359,000 for a total agreement price of $4,171,200. Staff also requests a project budget adjustment in the amount of $725,000, for a new project total of $4,737,200. Lastly, staff requests authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to approve change orders. The authorization to approve change orders would allow the design-building agreement total to increase by no more than $366,000 or 8.6% of the amended design-build construction agreement cost ($4,171,200). Funding for this budget adjustment and project is provided by available resources in the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund. As a regional wastewater project, the Wastewater Regional Rehabilitation Fund will be reimbursed for approximately 35 percent of the project’s actual cost from the City's partners, the South Placer Municipal Utility District and Placer County.
CC #: 3443
File #: 0900-02-02-2 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Jeremy Snyder 916-746-1829 [email protected] Ordinances (for second reading and adoption)
6.29.Second Reading - Formation of Amoruso Ranch Community Facilities District No. 1 (Public Facilities) and Amoruso Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services); and Annexation of Territory and Authorize Special Taxes in City of Roseville Community Facilities District No. 3 (Municipal Services), Annexation No. 28, Amoruso Ranch
ORDINANCE NO. 6689 LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AMORUSO RANCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 1 (PUBLIC FACILITIES), for second reading and adoption.
CC #: 3460
File #: 0400-04-15 & 0400-09-01
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]
Ceremonial Documents
6.30.Proclamation - Parks and Recreation Month July 2024 Proclaim July 2024 as Parks and Recreation Month and urge all residents to visit and enjoy Roseville’s recreation facilities, parks, trails and open spaces.
CC #: 3458
File #: 0102-06
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]
6.31.Resolution - Brian Jacobson
Commend Brian Jacobson for his 19 years of outstanding service and dedication to the City of Roseville, congratulate him for his many accomplishments, and wish him a long, healthy, and enjoyable retirement.
CC #: 3459
File #: 0102-10
CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
7. RESOLUTIONS
7.1. Amoruso Ranch Community Facilities District No. 1 (Public Facilities) Improvement Area No. 1 Bond Issuance
Memo from Management Analyst Jeannine Thrash and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-253 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMORUSO RANCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (PUBLIC
FACILITIES), APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A
FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT, APPROVING THE FORM OF
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, APPROVING SALE OF SUCH
BONDS, AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS AND
ACTIONS. The bonds are being issued at the developer's request, in an amount not to exceed $36,000,000 for Series 2024, to: i) construct and acquire certain public facilities of benefit to the District, (ii) provide for a deposit to a debt service reserve account for the 2024 bonds, (iii) pay capitalized interest on the 2024 Bonds through September 1, 2024, and (iv) pay costs of issuance of the 2024 Bonds. The CFD will generate special taxes that will be paid by the property owners sufficient to pay the costs of the debt service, CFD administration, and any authorized pay-as-you-go facilities, as well as provide funding in the future for maintenance/replacement of constructed facilities. The issuance of these bonds will not impact the City's General Fund.
CC #: 3433
File #: 0400-04-15 & 0206-03-01
CONTACT: Jeannine Thrash 916-774-5473 [email protected] Dennis Kauffman 916-774-5313 [email protected]
8. ORDINANCES
8.1. Roseville Municipal Code Amendment - Massage Services Memo from Community Service Officer Erika Broussard, Police Captain Josh Simon, and Deputy City Attorney Travis Cochran recommending the City Council introduce for first reading an ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AMENDING CHAPTER 9.10 OF TITLE 9 OF
THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MASSAGE
SERVICES; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 24-271 ADOPTING MASSAGE
EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE APPLICATION AND RENEWAL FEES AND
INCORPORATING THE FEES INTO THE SCHEDULE OF USER AND
REGULATORY FEES. Staff requests Council approve the establishment of a new permitting fee. The resolution and fee only become effective upon final adoption of the Ordinance. Chapter 9.10 of the Roseville Municipal Code regulates massage services within the City. Since adoption of the current ordinance regulating massage services, many other jurisdictions have changed the way they regulate massage businesses, including increased education and training standards for massage therapists. These changes, among other things, have led to increased issues with illicit massage business activities within the City. The primary purposes for updating this chapter of the municipal code are to address ongoing challenges with illicit massage business activity and to better align the City’s regulations with state law and the City’s neighboring jurisdictions.
There is no fiscal impact associated with the proposed ordinance, as massage business enforcement is already budgeted. The recommended exemption certificate application fee and renewal fee were developed to recover the applicable processing costs.
CC #: 3457
File #: 0323
CONTACT: Erika Broussard 916-746-1069 [email protected] Josh Simon 916-774-5059 [email protected]
Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]
9. SPECIAL REQUESTS/REPORTS/PRESENTATION
9.1. C-63 Park Site - Master Plan Approval
Memo from Park Planning and Development Manager Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council approve the Master Plan for the C-63 park site. This 2.5-acre neighborhood park is located off of Lemonade Lane at Lower Bank Drive within the Creekview area of Roseville. The public outreach efforts included a virtual meeting held in September 2023, an in-person workshop held in December 2023, and a twoweek write-in period which opened at the end of March 2024 and closed in April 2024. The Parks & Recreation Commission recommended approval of the master plan at their June 3, 2024 meeting. Funding for the design of this project was approved in the FY2023-24 budget and a budget adjustment will be recommended in FY2024-25 for construction. Funds are allocated through the Creekview Neighborhood Park Fund. Funding for maintenance will be through the Creekview Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impact.
CC #: 3434
File #: 0704-01
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
9.2. KT-52 School/Park - Master Plan Approval
Memo from Park Planning and Development Manager Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council approve the Master Plan for KT-52 School/Park site. This 7.5-acre park is located on Sierra Village Drive within the Sierra Vista area of Roseville. The public outreach efforts included a virtual meeting held in November 2023 with 60 people attending, an in-person workshop held in January 2024 where 20 people attended, and a two-week write-in period in May 2024. The Parks & Recreation Commission recommended approval of the KT-52 master plan at the June 3, 2024 meeting. Funding for this project was approved in the FY2022-23 budget (for design) and the FY2023-24 budget (for construction) through the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund. Maintenance will be funded through the Sierra Vista Community Facilities District No. 2 (Public Services). There will be no General Fund impacts.
CC #: 3440
File #: 0704-01
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-775-5253 [email protected]
10. COUNCIL REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS
11. ADJOURNMENT
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3459
File #: 0102-03
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Melissa Lipp [email protected] 916-774-5268 Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.1.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Approve the minutes of the June 5, 2024 City Council Meeting, and June 19, 2024 City Council Meeting Closed Session, June 19, 2024 City Council Housing Authority Finance Authority Natural Gas Financing Authority Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Melissa Lipp, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3438
File #: 0704-01
Title: Hall Park Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.2.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve Contract Purchase Agreement #3003671 with PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc for the Hall Park play structure replacement and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BACKGROUND
On March 14, 2024, staff sought public feedback for a new play structure at Hall Park. The outreach process included social media and onsite signage with a QR code inviting residents to review, comment and vote on the proposed play structure design. Through a two-week write-in period, feedback received was minimal. Nine comments were received and indicated general support with requests for shade and an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) swing. The play structure design includes shade and an ADA swing was added to the swing area. Other comments included suggestions for general park improvements outside of the scope of this project, and will be considered as funding allows.
This Contract Purchase Agreement with PlayPower is to purchase and install the play structure through a piggy-back agreement, using Sourcewell contract #010521-LTS, in order to utilize the best costs for the equipment. Delivery of this play structure is expected in fall/winter 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended contract purchase agreement has a not-to-exceed amount of $219,817.17.
The funding for this play structure replacement was approved by Council in the FY2023-24 Capital Improvement Program using the Parks, Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund.
Maintenance is funded by the General Fund and will not increase.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the replacement of an existing facility amenity. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-256
CPA #3003671
5-12 Yr old Design
2-5 yr old design
CEQA
James Hall Park Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-256
APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC. AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, contract purchase agreement (3003671) for the replacement of the play structure at Hall Park, by and between the City of Roseville and PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said contract purchase agreement and technology and services agreement are approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Veterans Park (South) and Hall Park – Play Structure Replacement Project Project Location(s): 1750 Blue Oaks Boulevard (APN 017-117-052-000) and 1401 Raeburn Way (APN 017-390-003-000), Roseville, CA 95747.
Project Description: The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department proposes to demolish, remove, and replace two existing aging play structures at Veterans Park (South) and Hall Park.
Hall Park would add shade structures as well.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Park, Recreation and Libraries Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 2 Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.
The project activities are replacement and/or repair of existing structures and equipment and will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing structures and equipment. Therefore, the Class 2 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Tara Gee, Park, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. 916-774-5253.
Signature: Date: 4/30/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3451
File #: 0704-01
Title: Veterans Park (South) Play Structure Replacement - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.3.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve Contract Purchase Agreement #3003672 with PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc for the Veterans Park (South) play structure replacement and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BACKGROUND
On March 14, 2024, staff sought public feedback for a new play structure at Veterans Park (South). The outreach process included social media and onsite signage with a QR code inviting residents to review, comment and vote on the proposed play structure design. Through a twoweek write-in period, one comment was received. The comment appreciated the military themed play structure and was supportive of the design.
This Contract Purchase Agreement with PlayPower is to purchase and install the play structure through a piggy-back agreement using Sourcewell contract #010521-LTS, in order to obtain the best costs for the equipment. The delivery and install of this play structure is expected to occur in fall/winter 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended contract purchase agreement has a not-to-exceed amount of $151,750.83.
The funding for this play structure replacement was approved by Council in the FY2023-24 Capital Improvement Program using the Parks, Recreation and Library Capital Projects Fund.
Maintenance is funded by the General Fund and will not increase.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves the replacement of an existing facility amenity. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 2 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning & Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-266
CPA #3003672
Play Structure 3D- A
Play Structure 3D- B
CEQA
Veterans Park (South) Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-266
APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY AND
SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON, INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, contract purchase agreement (3003672) for the replacement of the play structure at Veterans Park (South), by and between the City of Roseville and PlayPower LT Farmington, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said contract purchase agreement and technology and services agreement are approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Notice of Exemption
To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678
Project Title: Veterans Park (South) and Hall Park – Play Structure Replacement Project Project Location(s): 1750 Blue Oaks Boulevard (APN 017-117-052-000) and 1401 Raeburn Way (APN 017-390-003-000), Roseville, CA 95747.
Project Description: The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department proposes to demolish, remove, and replace two existing aging play structures at Veterans Park (South) and Hall Park.
Hall Park would add shade structures as well.
Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Park, Recreation and Libraries Department
Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 2 Exemption as described in Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:
“Class 2 consists of replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced.
The project activities are replacement and/or repair of existing structures and equipment and will have the same purpose and capacity as the existing structures and equipment. Therefore, the Class 2 Exemption is applicable to the proposed project.
Lead Agency Contact Person: Tara Gee, Park, Recreation and Libraries Department, 316 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 95678. 916-774-5253.
Signature: Date: 4/30/2024
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator
City of Roseville
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3430
File #: 0203-07
Title: Water Treatment Chemicals - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Nathan Ribordy 916-746-1673 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.4.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract purchase agreement with ChemTreat, Inc. to provide specialty water treatment chemicals and services to Roseville Electric Utility. The original purchase agreement was for a one-year term for $250,000 per contract year, and allowed for up to four optional one-year renewals. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing optional renewal years without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.
BACKGROUND
The City operates three natural-gas fired power plants. Operation of the plants requires water treatment processes for onsite water systems including, but not limited to, boilers, an open cooling tower, crystallizers, associated zero liquid discharge equipment, and water demineralization. Water treatment services and specialty chemicals are required for proper function of the various water systems. Supplied specialty chemicals and services will support continued safe and efficient operation of the facilities.
The Electric Department solicited proposals through Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 07-090 for specialty water treatment chemicals and services. Three vendor proposals were received in response to the RFP. After determining the vendors were responsive and responsible, the evaluation team reviewed and scored the proposals based on qualifications, project understanding and project plan, proposed cost, and required documents. ChemTreat, Inc. scored the highest of the three proposals evaluated. City Council awarded the first of five potential years under Resolution 23-318 which was approved on July 19, 2023, and staff is requesting authorization to continue utilizing optional renewal years without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.
FISCAL IMPACT
This contract purchase agreement will be for a period of one year, with up to three optional oneyear renewals. The total annual costs are not to exceed $250,000 per contract year. Funding is included in the Electric Fund budget for FY2024-25 and funding for future years is subject to City Council approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of specialty chemicals and support services meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services.
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.
Respectfully Submitted,
Nathan Ribordy, Power Generation Superintendent
Dan Beans, Electric Utility Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-246
Contract PurchaseAgreement
RESOLUTION NO. 24-246
APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CHEMTREAT, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3003643) for specialty water treatment chemicals and services, by and between the City of Roseville and ChemTreat, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewal without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
Supplier Details:
Company ChemTreat Inc
Contact Karl Wolff
Address 5640 Cox Rd
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Submit your response to:
Company City of Roseville
Contact "Becky" Rebecca Philipp
Address Purchasing Division
311 Vernon St
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone (916) 746-1110
Fax (916) 746-1115
E-mail [email protected]
This Contract Purchase Agreement is sent for your review and acceptance. Notify the Buyer via email of any needed changes to the company name, address, and contact information. The Buyer will update the agreement prior to you signing the document.
Return signed copies of the agreement to the Buyer noted on the agreement. Alterations or modifications to the agreement are not allowed. Upon receipt of all necessary documents, the City will sign the agreement and return a fully executed copy to you. Receipt of the signed copy will be your notice to proceed with the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement. Work must not begin until the contract has been fully executed.
The following guidelines must be followed for the signature block on the agreement:
Sole proprietorship - By owner
Partnership - Any general partner
Corporation - Two options:
(1) A signature from the President and the corporate seal; OR (2) One signature from the Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice President AND one signature from the Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, or any Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer of the corporation
*General Manager, Office Manager and/or Sales Manager are not corporate officer titles. The agreement will be rejected if not signed in accordance with these guidelines.
Insurance requirements:
The City's insurance requirements are referenced on Attachment A of the agreement. By signing the agreement, you are confirming that your company has the minimum insurance limits required. 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
Agreement 3003643
Agreement Date 07-MAY-2024
Revision 0
Agreement Amount 250,000.00 USD
Invoice To City of Roseville
Accounts Payable
311 Vernon St
ROSEVILLE CA 95678
Supplier ChemTreat Inc
5640 Cox Rd
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
(916) 774-5488
(916) 784-3796
[email protected]
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
(916) 224-7633
()
[email protected]
Description of
Labor,
equipment
and/or materials
THE SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE THE SERVICES CALLED FOR UNDER THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) 07-090 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS AND SERVICE AND CHEMTREAT INC'S PROPOSAL DATED 03-23.
THE TERMS AND SCOPE OF WORK OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE RFP 07-090 AND
SUPPLIER'S PROPOSAL ARE HEREIN MADE PART OF THE CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND FULLY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
START DATE: UPON EXECUTED AGREEMENT
END DATE: 5/15/25
PLEASE CONTACT TONY JOHNSON AT THE ROSEVILLE ENERGY PARK AT 916- 746-1656 OR [email protected] FOR QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS CONTRACT.
*Total cost listed below is an approximation only. The City does not guarantee whatsoever the actual value of this agreement.
Customer # Supplier # Payment Terms Freight Terms FOB Shipping Method 15647 Net 30 Freight on Board at the destination Destination Best Method Start Date End Date Confirm To
"Becky" Rebecca Philipp Phone 1-916-746-1110
Attention: Total Cost not to exceed the agreement amount without prior approval of the Purchasing office. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
Contract Terms and Conditions
1. To the fullest extent allowed by law, Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and save and hold harmless City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from any claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought forth, or on account of, injuries to or death of any person (including but not limited to workers and the public), or damage to property, resulting from or arising out of Contractor's willful misconduct or negligent act or omission while engaged in the performance of obligations or exercise of rights created by this Agreement, except those matters arising from City's sole negligence or willful misconduct. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed. Contractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The defense and indemnity obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.
Any and all indemnification imposed upon Contractor are limited to the extent of those damages proportionately caused by Contractor's breach of the Agreement, negligence, wrongful conduct, or violations of law. In not case is Contractor liable for any damages caused by negligence, misuse or misapplication of goods by others.
2. Contractor is an independent contractor, and shall not be considered an officer, agent or employee of the City.
3. Without the written consent of the City, this Agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part.
4. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
5. At any time during the term of this Agreement, both the City and the Contractor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, provided that the other Party is given thirty (30) days written notice. Contractor shall be entitled to all costs reasonably incurred prior to the date of termination. Contractor acknowledges that City may terminate this Agreement should funds not be appropriated by its governing body to continue services under this Agreement.
6. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing. It is integrated and contains the complete understanding of the parties.
7. All equipment, supplies and services sold to the City of Roseville shall conform to the general safety orders of the State of California.
8. Unless notified to the contrary, in writing, the City assumes that the Contractor has accepted the work in accordance with the plans and specifications (if any) and agrees to do the work in compliance with this Agreement.
9. All fair employment practices must be adhered to. In addition, if the project referenced on this service agreement is a Public Works project, all prevailing wage laws must be complied with. For prevailing wage contracts over $25,000, copies of certified payroll must be submitted with invoices. Prevailing wage rates may be obtained from the State Department of Industrial Relations and/or the following website address: http://www.dir. ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm. In compliance with Labor Code Section 1773.2, as may be amended from time to time, Contractor shall cause a copy of this website to be posted at each jobsite, as applicable.
10. Contractor agrees to the below insurance requirements:
3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
a. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall maintain the policies of insurance outlined in Attachment A, incorporated herein by this reference, in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement. The City of Roseville retains sole discretion in determining the types and proper levels of insurance coverage.
b. Form. Contractor shall submit a certificate evidencing such coverage for the period covered by this Agreement in a form satisfactory to Risk Management and the City Attorney, prior to undertaking any work hereunder. Any insurance written on a claims made basis is subject to the approval of Risk Management and the City Attorney.
c. Additional Insureds. Contractor shall also provide a separate endorsement or section of the policy showing City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds for each type of coverage, except for Workers' Compensation. Such insurance shall specifically cover the contractual liability of Contractor. The additional insured coverage under the Contractor's policy shall be primary and noncontributory, as evidenced by a separate endorsement or section of the policy, and shall not seek contribution from City's insurance or self-insurance. In addition, the additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) CG 20 01 Endorsement. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and limits shall be available to the additional insureds.
Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be:
(1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement. d. Cancellation/Modification. Contractor shall provide ten (10) days written notice to City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance required by this Agreement.
e. Umbrella/Excess Insurance. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and excess insurance. Any excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of City (if agreed to in a written contract) before City's own insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to include in its contracts with all subcontractors the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, to the extent they apply to the scope of the subcontractor's work. Furthermore, Contractor shall require its subcontractors to agree to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City under this Agreement.
Additionally, Contractor shall obligate its subcontractors to comply with these same provisions with respect to any tertiary subcontractor, regardless of tier. A copy of City's indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the subcontractor or tertiary subcontractor upon request.
g. Self-Insured Retentions. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability.
Policies containing any SIR provision shall provide or be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. The failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of such right.
h. Waiver of Subrogation. Contractor hereby agrees to waive subrogation which 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
any insurer of Contractor may acquire from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss under a Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability or Automobile Liability policy. All Workers Compensation, Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability policies shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for all work performed by Contractor, its employees, agents and subcontractors. i. Liability/Remedies. Insurance coverage in the minimum amounts set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve Contractor of liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it preclude City from taking such other actions as are available to it under any other provisions of this Agreement or law.
11. Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws and ordinances, including but not limited to the City's storm water regulations, as may be applicable to the performance of services under this Agreement. Failure to comply with local ordinances may result in monetary fines and cancellation of this Agreement. Refer to www.roseville. ca.us/stormwater for links to more information on the City's storm water regulations.
12. In the event that the terms of any attachment or exhibit conflict with any terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
13. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by email delivery of a ".pdf" format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or ".pdf" signature page were an original hereof.
14. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Agreement or the performance thereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorneys' fees. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
15. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the respective parties hereto.
16. If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Agreement as a whole.
17. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms "Contractor," "Consultant," and "Supplier" are used interchangeably.
18. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: No contractor or subcontractor may work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. During the performance of this agreement, Contractor and its subcontractors shall have a continuing legal obligation to maintain current registration with the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor is hereby notified that this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.
19. Vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 8,500 lbs. and light duty package delivery vehicles operated in California may be subject to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Advanced Clean Fleets regulations. Such vehicles may 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
therefore be subject to requirements to reduce emissions and air pollutants. For more information, visit the CARB Advanced Clean Fleet webpage at: https://ww2.arb. cagov/our-work/programs/advanced-clean-fleets
20. Contractor/consultant's duties and services under this agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the public entity with any portion of the public entity's preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract with the public entity. The public entity entering this agreement shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Contractor/consultant's participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications, if any, shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Contractor/consultant shall cooperate with the public entity to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by contractor pursuant to this agreement.
21. If the project referenced on this agreement is a Public Works project, then the following shall apply: Contractor must submit all claims as defined in and in accordance with the claim resolution process set forth in Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code. Each such claim must be sent to the City by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested and must contain reasonable documentation to support the claim. All claims must be received prior to acceptance of the work.
22. The Levine Act (Govt. Code, Section 84308) requires a Party (and its agent(s), if any) to a Proceeding before the City of Roseville that involves any action or consideration related to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contributions made to City elected or appointed officers totaling more than $250 within the twelve (12) months prior to the City decision and while a proceeding is pending, and includes certain prohibitions on contribution activity thereafter. If applicable campaign contributions have been made by Contractor and/or its agent(s), Contractor is responsible for compliance, including for its disclosure obligations, if any, as further described at:
https://www.roseville.ca.
us/government/departments/city_clerk/transparency/levine_act
23. CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify CITY if, despite the parties intent and practice, any venue, agency, or court with competent jurisdiction determines that CONTRACTOR and/or any of its agents, officers, employees, volunteers, independent contractors, or subcontractors, are characterized as employee(s) of CITY.
CONTRACTOR and CITY agree that: (a) CONTRACTOR is free from the control and direction of CITY in connection with the performance of the work; (b) CONTRACTOR is providing services directly to CITY; (c) CONTRACTOR has and will maintain at all relevant times a business license; (d) CONTRACTOR maintains a business location that is separate from CITY; (e) CONTRACTOR is customarily engaged in an independently established business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed hereunder; (f) CONTRACTOR actually contracts with other businesses to provide the same or similar services and maintains a clientele without restrictions from CITY; (g) CONTRACTOR advertises and holds itself out to the public as available to provide the same or similar services; (h) CONTRACTOR provides its own tools, vehicles, and equipment to perform the services; (i) CONTRACTOR has negotiated its own rates; (j) CONTRACTOR set its own hours and location of work in accomplishing CITY's on-call needs; and (k) CONTRACTOR has the right to control the manner and means of accomplishing the result desired and exercises its own expert independent judgement.
24. Contractor certifies that Contractor, its employees, directors, officers, agents, subcontractors, vendors, and volunteers are not presently debarred, excluded, suspended, 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
declared ineligible, voluntarily excluded, or proposed for debarment, exclusion, suspension or ineligibility by any federal, state, or local department or agency.
25. This Agreement may be amended via change order, but only if such change order is made in writing, approved by the City, and signed by both parties.
26. Limitation of Liability. The total liability of Supplier and its subsidiaries, affiliates, employees, directors, officers and agents arising out of performance, nonperformance, or obligations in connection with the design, manufacture, sale, delivery, and/or use of good and/or services in no circumstance includes any liquidated, penalty, incidental or consequential damages of any kind, nor exceed an amount that is equip to four times total amount of compensation actually paid to Supplier under the agreement, except only in the case of damages arising due to Supplier's willful misconduct.
The supplier named hereon by the acceptance of this order agrees to the provisions of this document titled "Contract Purchase Agreement" and all accompanying terms, conditions, and attachments.
Roseville Business License No. ____________________________________ Contractor License No. ____________________________________________ DIR Registration No. _______________________________________________ Check mark the applicable company type below:
___________ Corporation
___________ Limited Liability Company
___________ Partnership
___________ Sole Proprietor
City Reserves the right to withold any payments to contractor in the event of noncompliance with insurance requirements or if required by law.
General T&C Negotiated for ChemTreat, Inc
REV 6/7/23 JM with new legislation approved 5/7/24
7 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 15647 Supplier number
X
N/A
N/A
Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
ATTACHMENT A
HUMAN RESOURCES/RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
AGREEMENT OVER FORMAL BID LIMIT OR INVOLVING HIGH RISK ACTIVITIES General - Required Coverage/Documentation
● General Liability: $1 Million per occurrence /$2 Million aggregate ● Automobile Liability: $1 Million combined single limit ● Workers' Compensation: Statutory *Must provide a Waiver of subrogation ● Additional Insured Endorsement (AIE) - General Liability policy: CG 20 38 04 13 or an equivalent, blanket endorsement or section of the policy. Endorsement shall cover the City of Roseville, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers as additional insured. ● Policies must be primary and non-contributory
● A 30 day notice of cancellation must be provided
● List certificate holder as: The City of Roseville - Insurance Compliance, PO Box 100085-R1, Duluth, GA 30096
Additional Liability/Insurance Requirements if required by Agreement (and marked below):
Construction:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Design Professional:____
General Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
$4 Million aggregate
Professional Liability:
$2 Million/occurrence
Professional Consultant:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
IT Services:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
Cyber Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Hazardous Materials:____
Pollution Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
Special Events/Caterers-Vendors:____
No auto required
No workers' comp required
Professional Counseling/ Psychological:____
Professional Liability:
$1 Million/occurrence
No auto required
8 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
Pyrotechnics:____
General Liability:
$5 Million/occurrence
$10 Million aggregate
Auto - $2 Million/occurrence
Chemical/Environmental:__X__
General Liability:
$3 Million/occurrence
$6 Million aggregate
Pollution – $2 Million/Occurrence
Auto - $2 Million/Occurrence
Insurance Submission Process
The City of Roseville Human Resources/Risk Management Department uses a service called EBIX to manage our insurance certificate tracking.
How It Works
● The vendor's contact information is entered into EBIX. EBIX will contact the vendor to request proof of insurance.
● The Vendor can forward the request to their Insurance Agent(s) if necessary. ● Vendor/Insurance Agent submits insurance to EBIX by email to [email protected] or by fax to (770) 325-5727. After faxing or emailing the certificate, please DO NOT send the certificate by mail to EBIX. Please do not mail, email or fax any certificates to the City of Roseville. ● Once submitted, EBIX reviews the insurance documentation. If there are deficiencies, EBIX will send a follow up letter or email requesting additional information.
Questions Regarding Insurance Submission: Contact EBIX at (951) 652-4239 Questions Regarding Insurance Requirements Contact Risk Management at (916) 774-5202 9 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
COR CARB Compliance
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD REGULATION COMPLIANCE
Please indicate whether the Contractor is subject to, and/or in compliance with, the following regulations of the California Air Resources Board.
In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation
1) Will vehicles subject to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, §§ 2449 et seq. be used for the project? This includes, but is not limited to:
a) Vehicles with a diesel-fueled or alternative diesel fueled off-road compressionignition engine with maximum power (max hp) of 25 horsepower (hp) or greater provided that the vehicle cannot be registered and driven safely on-road or was not designed to be driven on-road, even if it has been modified so that it can be driven safely on-road
b) Workover rigs
c) Certain two-engine vehicles
Yes ____ No ____
2) If you answered "Yes" to 1), you must submit a valid Certificate of Reported Compliance to the City as provided in Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, § 2449(n).
Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation
Pursuant to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 13, § 2013(i)(1), the Contractor shall submit to the City a document evidencing that it is listed on the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage as a compliant fleet OR a signed statement stating that it is not subject to the High Priority and Federal Fleets regulation of title 13, CCR section 2015 through 2015.6.
The High Priority Fleets regulation applies to, without limitation, entities with more than $50 million in gross annual revenues and/or which own, operate, or direct the operation of 50 or more vehicles in the total fleet.
1) Is the Contractor subject to the High Priority and Federal Fleets regulation of title 13, CCR section 2015 through 2015.6?
Yes ____ No ____
2) If you answered "Yes" to 1), you must submit a document evidencing that you are listed on the CARB Advanced Clean Fleets webpage as a compliant fleet.
Signature: _____________________________
Title: __________________________________
CARB Compliance
Rev 2/15/24 MC
10 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 VP-North America Sales
X
X
Contract Purchase Agreement 3003643
Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ Supplier
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name:_____________________________________________ Title:__________________________________________________ Date: __________________________________________________ City of Roseville, A Municipal Corporation
Signature:______________________________________________ Print Name: Dominick Casey
Title: City Manager
Date:__________________________________________________ 11 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 CFO, VP-Finance & IT
Lisa Bisschop
VP-North America Sales
John Alcorn
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
DocuSign Envelope ID: 4749B558-6FCA-43A5-91D4-B595639FE9FA
April, 2022
RE: Contractor and Grantee Compliance with Economic Sanctions Imposed in Response to Russia’s Actions in Ukraine
Dear Vendor:
On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-6-22 (EO) regarding sanctions in response to Russian aggression in Ukraine. The EO is located at https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/3.4.22-Russia-Ukraine-ExecutiveOrder.pdf.
The EO directs all agencies and departments that are subject to the Governor’s authority to take certain immediate steps, including notifying all contractors and grantees of their obligations to comply with existing economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law.
This correspondence serves as a notice under the EO that as a contractor or grantee, compliance with the economic sanctions imposed in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine is required, including with respect to, but not limited to, the federal executive orders identified in the EO and the sanctions identified on the U.S. Department of the Treasury website (https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/sanctionsprograms-and-country-information/ukraine-russia-related-sanctions). Failure to comply may result in the termination of contracts or grants, as applicable.
Please note that for any agreements or grants valued at $5 million or more you must report to the City of Roseville your compliance with economic sanctions including steps you have taken in response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, including, but not limited to, desisting from making new investments in, or engaging in financial transactions with, Russian entities, not transferring technology to Russia or Russian entities, and directly providing support to the government and people of Ukraine.
Sincerely,
4/25/2022
Shannon Wiest
City of Roseville
Purchasing and Warehouse Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3 DocuSign Envelope ID: C92D7CBE-1E39-49FF-97B7-C7138FEC0BD3
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3456
File #: 0800-02
Title:
Cash for Grass Program, Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project - Regional Water Authority Project Agreement
Contact: Bobby Alvarez 916-746-1710 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.5.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Project Agreement with the Regional Water Authority (RWA) to secure grant funding to augment the City’s water efficiency Cash for Grass rebate program and authorize the City Manager to execute it.
BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities (EU) Department and its Water Efficiency Section are responsible for proactive and efficient water resources planning as well as the implementation of water demand reduction activities where necessary to meet state water efficiency mandates. In addition, and most importantly, when drought conditions result in actual water supply shortages, EU‘s Water Efficiency Section works with the public to reduce demands of residential and commercial customers and navigate through the water shortage period.
One of the key areas to reduce outdoor water use is through incentivizing the replacement of landscaping turf that has a higher water demand through the City’s Cash for Grass (CFG) Rebate Program. Since inception, Roseville customers have removed more than 2.6 million square feet of turf with an estimated future water savings of 91 million gallons annually after plant establishment period.
Implementation of this program will be a fundamental tool to support the Water Utility’s strategic goal of water savings by lowering the residential gallons per capita per day (RGPCD) throughout the City. Through state mandates (SB 606 and AB 1668), legislative targets have been set and the City has timeframes and dates associated with achieving mandated goals to reduce residential water use – or fines will be imposed. The legislation establishes a per person goal of 55 gallons per day until 2025 and 42 gallons per day by 2030. According to state data, Californians used an average of 111 gallons of water per day in 2021. The Water Utility needs to use every tool available to help meet these targets.
This new offering will not replace funding for existing programs, but rather provide additional budget allowing the Water Utility to reach additional Roseville customers to achieve water savings and build conservation awareness. Grant funds supplied through the Regional Water Authority’s Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project will enable the Water Utility to offer expanded support for the Cash for Grass program, providing a minimum of 37 rebates under the program terms.
The Regional Water Efficiency Program (RWEP) grant is essentially a sub grant from RWA, which secured funding in February 2023 through a larger regional grant award agreement with the State Department of Water Resources via the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014. RWA funding is available to all participants in the RWA Joint Powers Agreement. The EU Water Efficiency Program would like to participate in the Turf Replacement Program identified in the Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project.
FISCAL IMPACT
The RWA Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project grant totals $500,000 and, of that, Roseville has been awarded $83,014. No match fund contribution is required. Staff request approval of the grant for $83,014. There will be no net effect on the available resources in the Water Operations Fund since all cost will be reimbursed by RWA.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a rebate program agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Bobby Alvarez, Water Conservation Administrator
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-270
RWA WEP Project Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 24-270
APPROVING A PROJECT AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AND THE REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a Project Agreement for Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project, by and between the City of Roseville and the Regional Water Authority, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Project Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY
PROJECT AGREEMENT
TURF REPLACEMENT AND CUSTOMER OUTREACH PROJECT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the __ day of _______, 2024, by and between the Regional Water Authority (“RWA”), a joint exercise of powers authority formed under California Government Code section 6500, and following, and the Members and Contracting Entities of RWA listed in Exhibit 1 to this Agreement, upon their execution of this Agreement (who are collectively referred to in this Agreement as “Participants”), to provide for carrying out a project or program that is within the authorized purposes of RWA, and sharing in the cost and benefits by the Participants.
RECITALS
A. RWA is a joint powers authority, formed to serve, represent, and align the interests of regional water providers and stakeholders for the purpose of improving water supply reliability, availability, quality and affordability.
B. The joint powers agreement (“RWA JPA”) pursuant to which RWA was formed and operates, authorizes RWA to enter into a “Project or Program Agreement,” which is defined in the RWA JPA as an agreement between RWA and two or more of its Members or Contracting Entities to provide for carrying out a project or program that is within the authorized purposes of RWA, and sharing in the cost and benefits by the parties to the Project or Program Agreement.
C. Article 21 of the RWA JPA states: “The Regional Authority’s projects are intended to facilitate and coordinate the development, design, construction, rehabilitation, acquisition or financing of water-related facilities (including sharing in the cost of federal, State or local projects) on behalf of Members and/or Contracting Entities. The Regional Authority may undertake the development, design, construction, rehabilitation, acquisition or funding of all or any portion of such projects on behalf of Members and/or Contracting Entities in the manner and to the extent authorized by such Members and/or Contracting Entities as provided in this Agreement, but shall not accomplish these functions, nor acquire or own water-related facilities in its own name.” D. Article 22 of the RWA JPA states: “Prior to undertaking a project or program, the Members and/or Contracting Entities who elect to participate in a project or program shall enter into a Project or Program Agreement. Thereafter, all assets, benefits and obligations attributable to the project shall be assets, benefits and obligations of those Members and/or Contracting Entities that have entered into the Project or Program Agreement. Any debts, liabilities, obligations or indebtedness incurred by the Regional Authority in regard to a particular project or program, including startup costs advanced by the Regional Authority, shall be obligations of the participating Members and/or Contracting Entities, and shall not be the debts, liabilities, obligations and indebtedness of those Members and/or Contracting Entities who have not executed the Project or Program Agreement.” E. RWA and the Participants desire to carry out a project and share in the costs and benefits of the project, as a Project or Program Agreement as provided for in Articles 21 and 22 of the RWA JPA.
F. The RWA Regional Water Efficiency Program (“RWEP”) is an integral part to achieving RWA’s mission and provides a valuable service to RWA and RWEP members.
In consideration of the promises, terms, conditions and covenants contained herein, the parties to this Agreement hereby agree as follows:
1. Recitals Incorporated. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference.
2. Defined Terms. Terms defined in the RWA JPA will have the same meaning in this Agreement.
3. Description of the Project. A key element of the RWA RWEP is to support the water conservation programs of the 19 member agencies. As signatories of the Water Forum Agreement (www.waterforum.org), members participating in the RWEP have committed to implementing a number of Best Management Practices for urban water conservation. The Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project (“Project”) will expand current and build new residential and commercial/institutional customer efficiency and outreach programs in the Sacramento region. The Project will address outdoor savings and will be focused on providing rebates to residential and commercial/institutional customer properties. Customers will be provided rebate funding to encourage the replacement of turf grass with low water use/native plants and low water use turf alternatives/groundcover. Artificial turf purchase and installation is not reimbursable for this project. Irrigation equipment such as high efficiency sprinkler nozzles and drip irrigation will also be available for rebate funding only for customers that also participate in a turf replacement rebate as upgrading inefficient irrigation is necessary to achieve the potential water savings associated with turf removal. This project has an overall goal of replacing over 333,333 square feet of turf grass in 222 households/businesses/institutions (assuming 1,500 square feet replaced per customer) to achieve a water savings of 38 acre-feet per year and 946 acre-feet over the 25- year lifetime benefits period. This agreement focuses on water provider /Participant requirements to locally implement and receive reimbursement funds for turf replacement and irrigation efficiencies rebate programs. Project Water Provider Participants are listed in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 2 outlines DWR contractual obligations that all Participants must adhere to if they are to receive any funding for this Project. Grant reimbursable expenses are for the period beginning July 1, 2023 and ending April 1, 2026 per the funding agreement with DWR. A description of the grant project statement of work including reimbursement procedures is included as Exhibit 3. Project Participants agree to submit information associated with fulfilling the statement of work in a timely fashion to allow RWA to meet reporting requirements. Additionally, all project Participants will calculate, and report water savings based on a standard methodology developed by the RWEP project manager.
4. Sharing in Project Costs and Benefits. Subject to the provisions of Articles 7 and 9 of this Agreement, it is anticipated that up to 19 RWA members, contracting agencies and other local agencies will participate in the Project as listed in Exhibit 1. Non-RWA members may participate in the Project; however, there may be subject to a 20% surcharge for any fees collected for the Project. Agencies that are both non-RWA members and non-RWEP members may be subject to a total 40% surcharge.
Surcharges collected are to be designated to the RWA Operating Fund. Each Participant will pay an apportioned share of the project costs, based on their relative estimated benefit received from the grant program, for any fees that need to be collected for the Project.
Exhibit 4 provides an estimate of the benefit for each of the Participants. Note that the grant provides a total of $500,000 for the Project. Exhibit 4 serves to identify the grant-reimbursable funds requested by the Participant that have been reserved for its use, unless it requests to release these funds due to nonuse. Any released or remaining funds will be available to Participants on a first-come, first-served basis by placing an official request with RWEP staff. Participants must use all of their initial allocated funds outlined in Exhibit 4 before requesting additional grant funding. Finally, Participants not currently identified in Exhibit 1 or Exhibit 4 may be added to this Agreement following its execution subject to availability of funds and approval of the RWA RWEP Program Manager.
In accordance with the provisions of Articles 21 and 22 of the RWA JPA, any debts, liabilities, obligations or indebtedness incurred by RWA in regard to the Project will be the obligations of the Participants, and will not be the debts, liabilities, obligations and indebtedness of those Members and/or Contracting Entities who have not executed this Agreement.
5. Role of RWA. The Executive Director of RWA will: (a) ensure that the interests of Members and Contracting Entities of RWA who do not participate in this Project are not adversely affected in performing this Agreement, (b) provide information to the Participants on the status of implementation of the Project, and (c) administer the grant on behalf of RWA and the Participants consistent with the provisions of this Agreement.
6. RWA Project Management Fee. The management fee to administer the Project has an estimated budget of $41,445 and will be funded by the grant ($11,045) and non-state cost share provided by RWA staff/consultant time ($30,400). There will be no additional costs for the Participants.
7. Authorization to Proceed with the Project. Upon execution of this Agreement, each Participant will be authorized to administer associated outdoor rebate incentives up to the amount defined in Exhibit 4 for each respective Participant.
8. Term. This Agreement will remain in effect for so long as any obligations under this Agreement remain outstanding.
9. Withdrawal. A Participant may withdraw from this Agreement without requiring termination of this Agreement, effective upon ninety days’ notice to RWA and the other Participants, provided that, the withdrawing Participant will remain responsible for any indebtedness incurred by the Participant under this Agreement prior to the effective date of withdrawal.
11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended from time to time with the approval of all of the Participants and RWA. Changes to Exhibit 1, Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 do not require an amendment and will be approved by RWEP Program Manager.
12. General Provisions. The provisions of Articles 37 through 41, inclusive, of the RWA JPA, and the provisions of Article 10 (“General Provisions”) of any Participation Agreement entered into between RWA and a Participant, will apply to this Agreement.
The foregoing Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project Agreement is hereby consented to and authorized by RWA and the Participants.
Dated: ______ __, 2024
Signature
Name
Regional Water Authority
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a municipal corporation
BY: _________________________
DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager
ATTEST:
BY: _________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: __________________________
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
BY: __________________________
Environmental Utilities Director
Sean Bigley for Richard Plecker
EXHIBIT 1
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY
TURF REPLACEMENT AND CUSTOMER OUTREACH PROJECT
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Water Provider/Participant
1. Carmichael Water District
2. City of Roseville
3. City of Sacramento
4. Placer County Water Agency (PCWA)
5. Sacramento Suburban Water District (SSWD)
6. San Juan Water District (SJWD)
EXHIBIT 2
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY
TURF REPLACEMENT AND CUSTOMER OUTREACH PROJECT
DWR CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS FOR PARTICIPANTS
1. State Audit Document Requirements
The following provides a list of documents typically required by State Auditors and general guidelines for the Grantee. List of documents pertains to both State funding and the Grantee’s Local Cost Share and details the documents/records that State Auditors would need to review in the event of this Grant Agreement is audited. The Grantee should ensure that such records are maintained for each funded project.
Internal Controls
1. Organization chart (e.g., Agency’s overall organization chart and organization chart for the State funded Program/Project).
2. Written internal procedures and flowcharts for the following:
a. Receipts and deposits
b. Disbursements
c. State reimbursement requests
d. Expenditure tracking of State funds
e. Guidelines, policy, and procedures on State funded Program/Project
3. Audit reports of the Agency internal control structure and/or financial statements within the last two years.
4. Prior audit reports on the State funded Program/Project.
State Funding:
1. Original Grant Agreement, any amendment(s) and budget modification documents.
2. A listing of all bond-funded grants, loans, or subventions received from the State.
3. A listing of all other funding sources for each Program/Project.
Contracts:
1. All subcontractor and consultant contracts and related or partners’ documents, if applicable.
2. Contracts between the Agency and member agencies as related to the State funded Program/Project.
Invoices:
1. Invoices from vendors and subcontractors for expenditures submitted to the State for payments under the Grant Agreement.
2. Documentation linking subcontractor invoices to State reimbursement, requests and related Grant Agreement budget line items.
3. Reimbursement requests submitted to the State for the Grant Agreement.
Cash Documents:
1. Receipts (copies of warrants) showing payments received from the State.
2. Deposit slips (or bank statements) showing deposit of the payments received from the State.
3. Cancelled checks or disbursement documents showing payments made to vendors, subcontractors, consultants, and/or agents under the grants or loans.
4. Bank statements showing the deposit of the receipts.
Accounting Records:
1. Ledgers showing entries for funding receipts and cash disbursements.
2. Ledgers showing receipts and cash disbursement entries of other funding sources.
3. Bridging documents that tie the general ledger to requests for Grant Agreement reimbursement.
Administration Costs:
1. Supporting documents showing the calculation of administration costs.
Personnel:
1. List of all contractors and Agency staff that worked on the State funded Program/Project.
2. Payroll records including timesheets for contractor staff and the Agency personnel who provided services charged to the program
Project Files:
1. All supporting documentation maintained in the project files.
2. All Grant Agreement related correspondence.
2. Retention. The State shall withhold ten percent (10%) of the funds requested by the Grantee for reimbursement of Eligible Project Costs until the Project is completed and Final Report is approved.
Any retained amounts due to the Grantee will be promptly disbursed to the Grantee, without interest, upon completion of the Project.
3. Acknowledgement of Credit. Participants shall include appropriate acknowledgement of credit to the State for its support when promoting the Project or using any data and/or information developed under this Grant agreement. Signage shall be posted in a prominent location at Project site(s) (if applicable) or at the Participant’s headquarters and shall include the Department of Water Resources color logo and the following disclosure statement: “Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part from the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 and through an agreement with the State Department of Water Resources.” The Participant shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this Agreement a provision that incorporates the requirements stated within this Paragraph.
4. Child Support Obligations. Each Participant acknowledges in accordance with Public Contract Code section 7110, that: The Participant recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all applicable state and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Family Code section 5200 et seq.; and Each Participant also will fully comply with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and will provide the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the California Employment Development Department.
5. Drug-Free Workplace. Each Participant certifies, under penalty of perjury under the laws of State of California, its compliance with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code 8350 et seq.) and have or will provide a drug-free workplace by taking all of the actions:
a) Publish a statement notifying employees, contractors, and subcontractors that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees, contractors, or subcontractors for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). b) Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program, as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees, contractors, or subcontractors about all of the following:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
2. Grantee’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace,
3. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and
4. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees, contractors, and subcontractors for drug abuse violations.
c) Provide as required by Government Code Sections 8355(c), that every employee, contractor, and/or subcontractor who works under this Grant Agreement:
1. Will receive a copy of Grantee’s drug-free policy statement, and
2. Will agree to abide by terms of Grantee’s condition of employment, contract or subcontract.
6. Nondiscrimination. Each Participant acknowledges and agrees that it shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave or pregnancy disability leave. Participants shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code Section 12990 (a-f) et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). Each Participant shall give written notice of its obligations under this paragraph to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement.
7. Americans With Disabilities Act. Each Participant certifies that it complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C., 12101 et seq.), and all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA.
8. Submission of Reports. Each Participant will provide all reports, data, information, and certifications necessary for RWA to comply with all DWR reporting requirements, including the reports described in Exhibit 3. RWA will provide Participants with template report forms, reporting and instructions and related assistance to ensure the timely preparation and submittal of all reports in the necessary formats required under the Grant Agreement. Participants will timely respond to any RWA requests for additional information and work on required reports.
9. Accounting and Return of Grant Disbursement. Each Participant is obligated to account for the expenditure of all grant funds received. Participant’s obligations for accounting, disclosure and return of funds include:
a) Separate Accounting of Funding Disbursements: Participant shall account for the money disbursed pursuant to this Grant Agreement separately from all other Participant funds.
Participant shall maintain audit and accounting procedures that are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices, consistently applied. Participant shall keep complete and accurate records of all receipts, disbursements, and interest earned on expenditures of such funds. Participant shall require its contractors or subcontractors to maintain books, records, and other documents pertinent to their work in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices. Records are subject to inspection by State at any and all reasonable times.
b) Disposition of Money Disbursed: All money disbursed pursuant to this Funding Agreement shall be deposited in a non-interest-bearing account, administered, and accounted for pursuant to the provisions of applicable law.
c) Remittance of Unexpended Funds: Participant shall remit to State any unexpended funds that were disbursed to Participant under this Funding Agreement and were not used to pay Eligible Project Costs within a period of sixty (60) calendar days from the final disbursement from State to Grantee of funds or, within thirty (30) calendar days of the expiration of the Funding Agreement, whichever comes first.
10. Indemnification. Participant shall indemnify and hold and save the State, its officers, agents, and employees, free and harmless from any and all liabilities for any claims and damages (including inverse condemnation) that may arise out of the Project and this Agreement, including, but not limited to any claims or damages arising from planning, design, construction, maintenance and/or operation of levee rehabilitation measures for this Project and any breach of this Agreement. Participant shall require its contractors or subcontractors to name the State, its officers, agents and employees as additional insureds on their liability insurance for activities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement.
EXHIBIT 3
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY
TURF REPLACEMENT AND CUSTOMER OUTREACH PROJECT
PROJECT STATEMENT OF WORK
Regional Water Authority
Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project
Procedures and FAQs
Table of Contents
General Background and Funding Information ........................................................................................ 12 Project Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Reporting Requirements ........................................................................................................................... 18 Attachment A............................................................................................................................................ 20 Attachment B ............................................................................................................................................ 23
General Background and Funding Information
The Regional Water Authority (“RWA”) serves as the local administrative agent for the State of California’s Urban Community Drought Relief Grant Program. Funding for the Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project (“Project”) totaling $500,000 was awarded to RWA’s Regional Water Efficiency Program (“RWEP”) through the California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”) as part of the larger regional grant award in February 2023.
This project will expand current and build new residential, institutional and commercial outdoor customer efficiency and outreach programs in the Sacramento region. This project will not replace an existing funding source for an ongoing program but must expand a current program or start a new program. Examples of expanding a program include – increasing the program budget beyond an average annual budget level to serve more customers or offer additional services (like reimbursement for labor costs) within an existing rebate program that were not offered before. The project focus is the administration of turf replacement rebates. However, a customer participating in a turf replacement rebate is also eligible but not required to participate in an irrigation upgrade rebate. A customer may not receive an irrigation upgrade rebate without also participating in a turf replacement rebate at this same time.
Brief Rebate Descriptions
1. Turf Replacement Rebate - includes turf replacement with low water use/native plants and low water use turf alternatives/groundcover. Artificial turf purchase and installation is not eligible.
2. Irrigation Efficiency Upgrades Rebate - includes the installation of new equipment or upgrades to smart controllers, drip irrigation, sprinkler nozzles, etc.
The minimum funding per water provider for the combined (turf replacement and irrigation efficiencies) rebate is $75,000. Remaining funding after the minimum funding is provided to all Participants will be allocated based on number of connections. Available funding per water provider is in Exhibit 4. The maximum grant funded rebate amount per customer/property/meter is $2,250 for the combined turf replacement rebate, efficiency irrigation rebate and professional installation. RWA is required to implement a minimum of 222 individual customer rebates through this Project.
Water providers can offer customers higher rebate amounts for their local programs, but RWA will only reimburse up to $2,250 per customer/property/meter.
Throughout Exhibit 3 and the associated attachments, the term “water provider” is used as a proxy for “Participant” for improve readability.
Project Overview
The Turf Replacement and Customer Outreach Project (“Project”) will expand current and build new residential and commercial/institutional customer efficiency and outreach programs in the Sacramento region. The Project will address outdoor savings and will be focused on providing rebates to residential and commercial/institutional customer properties. Customers will be provided rebate funding to encourage the replacement of turf grass with low water use/native plants and low water use turf alternatives/groundcover. Artificial turf purchase and installation is not reimbursable for this Project. Irrigation equipment such as high efficiency sprinkler nozzles and drip irrigation will also be available for rebate funding only for customers that also participate in a turf replacement rebate as upgrading inefficient irrigation is necessary to achieve the potential water savings associated with turf removal. This project has an overall goal of replacing over 333,333 square feet of turf grass in 222 households/businesses/institutional (assuming 1,500 square feet replaced per customer) to achieve a water savings of 38 acre-feet per year and 946 acre-feet over the 25-year lifetime benefits period.
Rebate amount per square foot of turf replaced will be determined by the local water provider.
A customer water use survey is optional but recommended for all participating customers. The survey can be done in person, on the phone, virtually or by reviewing and documenting customer water use through meter data. The purpose of the customer water use survey is to assess current water use, provide the customer with recommendations for upgrades and repairs (where applicable) and estimate water savings. Customer water use survey format should be water provider specific and in line with industry standards. Pre-inspections are also a form of a customer water use survey. Please contact RWA if you have questions about conducting customer water use surveys.
Funding available through this Project and the associated minimum number of rebates by participating water provider is below in Exhibit 4. The minimum number of rebates is the amount of total funding per water provider divided by the maximum rebate amount allowed ($2,250) per customer. A participating water provider does not need to use all available funding but cannot receive reimbursement for more than the maximum rebate amount from RWA per customer/meter/property. For every $2,250 reimbursed by RWA to a local water provider, the local water provider must complete at least one customer rebate. Rebates should only be administered to the property owner of record for each participating property.
1) Turf Replacement Rebate (REQUIRED FOR REIMBURSEMENT) What is the Turf Replacement Rebate?
The turf replacement rebate includes reimbursement to water providers for paying residential, commercial and institutional customers to remove turf grass in customer landscapes (backyards and front yards are included). An in person, virtual or desktop customer water use survey is recommended to estimate square footage of landscape to be replaced. Water providers with existing or new Turf Replacement Rebate programs will follow their agency’s rules and guidelines for turf replacement. A sample customer application template is provided for this rebate and the irrigation efficiencies rebate (Attachment A). Reimbursement for the purchase and installation of artificial turf is not allowed for this Project.
2) Irrigation Efficiency Rebates (OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL REBATE) What is the Irrigation Efficiencies Rebate?
The irrigation efficiencies rebate provides reimbursement to water providers for paying residential, commercial, and institutional customers to upgrade irrigation equipment to more efficient models/methods that are simultaneously participating in a turf replacement rebate. An in person, virtual or desktop customer water use survey is recommended to estimate square footage of landscape to be replaced. Water Providers may provide customers with a free customer water use survey and a list of various recommended irrigation system upgrades to increase efficiency. Examples of efficiency upgrades include but not limited to: replacing sprayers in non-turf areas with low volume drip irrigation systems, removing pop-up spray heads in turf areas and replacing them with low precipitation, high distribution uniformity or multistream rotator nozzles with an inches per hour (In/h) flow rate of 1.10, installing a pressure regulator on the irrigation system to reduce the pressure to an appropriate level for proper system performance, installing check valves in low-lying sprinklers to stop excess drainage from seeping from the sprinkler head and weather/soil moisture based smart irrigation controllers.
Additionally, RWA has created a sample customer application template for this Program (Attachment A). Please feel free to use this form or your own provider version. If you use your own provider form, the same information on the RWA template needs to be included.
What irrigation efficiencies equipment does the rebate cover? Participating water provider staff may determine site appropriate equipment based on the efficiency needs of an individual property.
Eligible equipment includes but not limited to:
• Smart (weather and/or soil moisture based) Irrigation Controllers o Controller must be on the SWAT-tested list, which can be found at www.irrigation.org/swat/ and/or WaterSense labeled list (where applicable), which can be found https://lookforwatersense.epa.gov/products/ • Drip irrigation systems
• Replacing mis-matched sprinkler heads with like-kind heads. • Water pressure-regulating devices
• Check valves
• Low precipitation, high distribution, uniformity or multi stream rotating nozzles • Rain shut off devices and/or soil moisture sensors
• Outdoor water use management device/flow sensor/master valve The unit cost of irrigation equipment purchased and installed must not exceed the manufacturer’s suggested retail price.
Can water providers receive reimbursement for irrigation efficiency rebates for customers that did NOT also participate in a turf replacement rebate? No. Customers must participate in a turf replacement rebate to also be eligible for an additional irrigation efficiencies rebate.
3) Professional Labor
Labor costs to install the recommended irrigation efficiencies, pressure regulating equipment and/or removal of turf/installation of new landscaping is also eligible for reimbursement from the grant. Labor cost reimbursements are limited to $150 per customer/meter/property. The $150 designated for labor is considered part of (not in addition to) the maximum rebate amount of $2,250 per customer/meter/property. If a Participant requests reimbursement for labor, a detailed invoice from a licensed contractor (contractor must have a current State of California C27, C36 or applicable CSLB A classification license) must be submitted with labor and equipment costs listed individually (see Attachment B for an example invoice). For more information about licensing, please visit the Department of Consumer Affairs – Contractors State License Board (CSLB) at https://www.cslb.ca.gov/about_us/library/licensing_classifications/ Equipment installation is covered by the rebate. Who is responsible for installation? The residential customer is ultimately responsible for equipment installation. However, the customer may choose to hire a third party or contractor for equipment installation and may be reimbursed through the Program, up to the limits described above. If the customer chooses to hire a professional and wants to be reimbursed by the Program, the work must be performed by a State of California licensed contractor that holds a C27, C36 or applicable CSLB A classification license and the business license much be a valid and current/up to date. Customers should be reminded to check the licensing status of any contractor they hire and that rebates will only be provided for work by licensed contractors. It is the water provider’s responsibility to confirm that the contractor has a valid license. Additionally, ReScape Qualified or Qualified Water Efficient Landscaper (QWEL) Professionals may meet the above qualifications. To find a ReScape Qualified Professional, customers may visit https://rescape.memberclicks.net/directory.
To find a QWEL Professional, customers may visit https://www.qwel.net/. Self-installation by a residential or commercial/institutional property owner/staff may not receive reimbursement for installation costs.
4) General Rebate Process
1. Customer submits completed application to their water provider.
2. Application is received and rebate funds are confirmed by the water provider.
3. OPTIONAL: Water provider contacts and schedules a customer water use survey.
4. OPTIONAL: The on-site, virtual or desktop customer water use survey is completed. Both the applicant/customer and the water provider approve the customer water use survey results.
5. Customer receives a list of water provider irrigation efficiency upgrades options and/or turf replacement guidance. All recommended upgrades, guidance, and repairs must be eligible for reimbursement as outlined above and by local water provider.
6. Customer purchases and installs recommended activities and equipment.
7. Customer submits purchase receipts to water provider as directed by local water provider.
8. Once approved by water provider, a rebate or bill credit will be issued by the water provider to the customer.
9. Water provider will submit rebate reporting data for reimbursement to RWA on a quarterly basis as outlined below. It is not necessary to provide RWA with customer receipts but water providers should keep all customer receipts submitted and receipt of payment to customers on file in the event DWR audits the grant.
Note: Some water provider programs purchase and install water savings equipment and services directly to the customer. In this case, there will be no customer receipt submission and the water provider will directly invoice RWA for their internal expenses with similar documentation.
This is a general rebate process; an individual provider’s rebate process may differ. The purpose of including this text is to provide guidance for those providers that may be developing a new rebate program with no previous experience.
What is generally required of the customer to receive the rebate? • Fill out the rebate application and submit it to the water provider. • OPTIONAL: Schedule and complete a customer water use survey administered by water provider or consultant.
• Purchase irrigation efficiencies, turf replacement materials and replacement landscaping recommended on the customer water use survey, if provided by water provider. • Install recommended irrigation efficiencies/turf replacement upgrades. • Submit original purchase and labor (if applicable) receipts to water provider as outlined by local water provider.
What is required from the water provider or consultant to receive reimbursement for the rebate?
• Outreach to the water provider’s customers about the rebate program through bill inserts, website, phone “on hold” messages, newsletters, etc.
• Receive and process customer application.
• OPTIONAL: Schedule and complete customer water use survey. • Collect customer receipts and retain all documentation from Project in case of audit from DWR.
▪ Irrigation Efficiencies Rebates:
Customer receipts are required to be collected for irrigation efficiencies rebates. RWA does not require water providers to submit customer receipts to RWA to receive reimbursement. However, keeping customer receipts provides coverage for water providers in the event DWR audits the grant and during the audit requests customer receipts as documentation. ▪ Turf Replacement Rebates:
Customer receipts are not required for turf replacement rebates. However, providers must be able to provide proof of payment of the rebate to a customer on request from DWR in the event DWR audits the grant and during the audit requests proof of payment.
• If the customer is approved, issue rebate check or account credit to customer. • Complete reporting requirements provided below and submit to RWA according to the schedule provided below in this document.
How will customer outreach be handled by each water provider? Rebate program outreach is the responsibility of each water provider. Water provider shall include appropriate acknowledgement of credit to the State for its support when promoting the
Project or using any data and/or information developed under this agreement. Signage shall be posted in a prominent location at Project site(s) (if applicable) or at the Water provider’s headquarters and shall include the Department of Water Resources color logo and the following disclosure statement: “Funding for this project has been provided in full or in part from the Budget Act of 2021 and through an agreement with the State Department of Water Resources.” The water provider shall also include in each of its contracts for work under this Agreement a provision that incorporates the requirements stated within this Paragraph and Exhibit 2. The above quoted phrase must be present on all outreach materials including websites. Contact RWA for applicable DWR logo images that are also required to be displayed on outreach materials.
Reporting Requirements
Each participating water provider is required to complete the Data Collection Worksheet (provided by RWA). DWR has requested the number of items along with the amounts rebated be included in the spreadsheet. For example, if the customer purchased 50 sprinkler heads, enter “50” in the reporting spreadsheet next to sprinkler heads (#). The required reporting information in Table A will be used by RWA to invoice the Department of Water Resources on a quarterly basis and provide water providers with reimbursement funding.
Table A – Reporting Information
Customer Data - REQUIRED
Customer Name Name of customer receiving survey & incentives Address Site Address - physical property location not the mailing address.
Street Name Street Name
City City
Zip Zip Code
Application ID Application number (provider provided tracking number) Application Date Date application approved
Turf Replaced Area in sq ft (#) Area of turf removed
Turf Rebate Amount ($) Total amount paid to customer/Rebate amount Total Amount Customer Spent ($) Total amount customer spent on project Application ID Application number (provider provided tracking number) Application Date Date application approved
Controller (#) Number of controllers rebated to customer Controller ($) Amount rebated for SWAT-tested/WaterSense Controller Controller Manufacturer Manufacturer of Irrigation Controller Controller Model Model of Irrigation Controller
Pressure Regulator Equipment (#) Number of pressure regulator equipment rebated to customer Pressure Regulator Equipment ($) Amount rebated for pressure regulator equipment Drip or Low Volume Equipment (#) Number of drip or low volume equipment rebated to customer Drip or Low Volume Equipment ($) Amount rebated for drip or low volume equipment Sprinkler Heads or Nozzles (#) Number of sprinkler heads or nozzles rebated to customer Sprinkler Heads or Nozzles ($) Amount rebated for sprinkler heads or nozzles Pipe & Pipe Fittings (#) Number of pipe and pipe fittings rebated to customers Pipe & Pipe Fittings ($) Amount rebated for pipe & pipe fittings Total IE Rebate Amount ($) Total amount paid to customer/Rebate amount for all irrigation efficiencies Total Amount Customer Spent ($) Total amount customer spent on project Installation ($) Total amount of installation cost rebated for both/either or turf and IE rebate Irrigation Efficiencies - OPTIONAL
Turf Replacement - REQUIRED
Installation - OPTIONAL
Table B displays the reporting schedule. Water providers must submit data to the RWA by the deadlines provided below.
Table B – Reporting Schedule
Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
7/1/2023 10/1/2023 1/1/2024
4/1/2024 7/1/2024 10/1/2024 1/1/2025
4/1/2025 7/1/2025 10/1/2025 1/1/2026
4/1/2026 7/1/2026 8/31/2026
Attachment A
Outdoor Rebate Program
Customer Application Template
Regional Water Authority
Outdoor Rebate Program
Instructions: Completely fill in Sections 1-7 of the application and submit to water provider.
1. Name and Address: 2. Application Date:
Applicant Name (Rebate Check/Credit Payable To)
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Company Name (if different than Applicant Name)
Daytime Phone No. Email
Site Name and Site Address (If same as above, check here ) City State Zip
Water Account Number Site Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN)* *APN can be found online by County. Sacramento County: assessorparcelviewer.saccounty.net/, Placer County: www.placer.ca.gov/5866/Property-Details , El Dorado County:
https://parcel.edcgov.us/ and Yolo County: www.yolocounty.org/government/general-government-departments/assessor/parcel-number-or-recorder-s-reference-search
3. Who is your water provider? (See list of participating water providers below.) Participating Water Providers:
Carmichael Water District City of Roseville City of Sacramento Placer County Water Agency Sacramento Suburban Water District San Juan Water District
4. Which of the following best describes your property? (Please circle one) Single Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Commercial/Business Institutional
5. Terms and Conditions
1. The applicant applying for the rebate must be a water service customer of one of the above participating water providers and the site where the equipment is to be installed must receive water service from one of those providers.
2. The site must currently be metered and have a minimum of 12 months of metered usage data.
3. Rebates are only available to improve existing in-ground irrigation systems and/or automatic timers. New irrigation system installations are not eligible. Turf replacement rebate must replace living and irrigated turf grass landscape.
4. The maximum combined rebate for turf replacement and irrigation system efficiency upgrades is $2,250 per customer/meter/property. Rebate may include materials and labor (installation) costs. Material cost per unit must not exceed manufacturer’s suggested retail price. Installation is the sole responsibility of the applicant. However, the applicant can choose to hire a licensed (State of California C27, C36 or applicable CSLB A classification license) landscape contractor. To confirm that a contractor holds a valid license visit www.cslb.ca.gov. Installation costs from a licensed landscape contractor can be reimbursed through this Program for up to $150 per meter/property/customer for a
total rebate not to exceed above limits of $2,250. In order to receive reimbursement for installation costs, a detailed invoice from a licensed contractor with itemized material and labor costs must be submitted to the water provider. Selfinstallation by a residential or commercial/institutional property owner/staff may not receive reimbursement for installation costs.
5. Rebates may be given for turf replacement, water efficient equipment and labor for installation of water efficient landscape equipment and turf removal/replacement. Incidental supplies such as couplings, wiring, electrical tape, etc. are excluded from rebate funding. Participants are eligible for one rebate per customer/meter/property.
6. Turf replacement upgrades include removal of current living and irrigated turf grass to be replaced by permeable materials including low water use and native vegetation, gravel, and mulch following your water provider’s program requirements.
Customer purchase receipts for plant materials may be required. Check with local water provider for more information.
7. Eligible irrigation equipment upgrades include equipment that improves irrigation efficiency as determined by the staff of the applicant’s water provider. Itemized receipts and/or invoices are required. Upgrades may include:
8. Any project that is started before the water provider approval is not eligible for a rebate.
9. All applications for rebates must be submitted by applicants no later than January 1, 2026.
10. Rebate program is subject to available funding. Rebates will be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis until funding is depleted. Submission of an application does not guarantee a rebate.
11. Applicant must be in “good” standing with their water provider. Applicant should contact their water provider if they are unsure of their current standing.
12. Water providers are entitled to fully review all reported labor and materials costs and reserve the right to deny reimbursement to any applicant for extraneous costs.
6. Instructions
1. Submit a completed application to your water provider. Once the application has been received and rebate funds have been identified, a water provider representative may contact you to schedule a customer water use survey, which includes an audit of your outdoor irrigation system (may be done virtually).
2. If a customer water use survey has been completed, the water provider will provide you with estimated square feet of turf replacement area and a list of the irrigation efficiency upgrade equipment/materials that are approved for purchase and eligible for a rebate.
3. Turf grass removal, purchase and installation of all approved irrigation equipment and new plant material must be completed within 120 days from the date of the approved customer rebate application.
4. You must provide original purchase receipts for irrigation upgrades to the water provider. Receipts are not required for turf grass removal. Submission of the applicable purchase receipts are required to be eligible for a rebate under this Program. If a contractor purchased the materials, you must request a detailed invoice showing separate line items for materials and labor.
5. A rebate will be issued by your water provider within 90 days from the application date. In most cases, rebate checks will be made payable to the applicant and mailed to the address provided on the application. However, some providers may issue rebate credits on eligible customers’ water service accounts.
7. Agreement
I irrevocably authorize the water provider, or anyone authorized/designated by the water provider, to use or reproduce any and all photographs which have been taken of my landscape as part of the Outdoor Rebate Program by the water provider or the water provider’s authorized agent(s) for any purpose determined by the water provider without compensation or further notice to me.
I have read and understand the program information as stated in the attached application materials including Program Terms and Conditions in Section 5 and Instructions in Section 6 of this application. I understand that by signing below, I agree to allow an official from my water provider to verify the installation of the equipment and new plant material at said property. I agree to indemnify and hold the Regional Water Authority, my water provider, and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents, harmless from any and all liability or claims for damage, including any attorneys’ fees and costs, connected to or in any way arising from the Outdoor Rebate Program, the inspection of the premises to verify proper installation, and any other activity related to this program.
a) Matched precipitation rate sprinkler heads equipped with pressure reducing devices or check valves: to standardize all equipment within systems.
b) Drip irrigation equipment: converting existing non-turf area spray equipment to low volume drip.
Note: Microspray systems do not meet the terms of the Program. Drip systems must be separated from overhead spray heads with an independent valve. c) Convert standard spray type nozzles to low precipitation, high distribution uniformity or multistream nozzles.
d) Pressure regulation equipment for irrigation system. e) Smart Irrigation Controllers or related equipment that upgrades standard irrigation timers to smart timers (i.e., rain sensor, moisture sensors, weather stations etc.).
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AND TITLE (IF APPLICANT IS A BUSINESS) DATE
Attachment B
Example of Itemized Equipment and Labor Invoice
EXHIBIT 4
REGIONAL WATER AUTHORITY
TURF REPLACEMENT AND CUSTOMER OUTREACH PROJECT
ESTIMATED WATER PROVIDER/PARTICIPANT BENEFITS
Participant Base Rebate
Funding
Service Connection
Rebate Funding
Total Rebate
Funding
Minimum # of
Required Rebates
Carmichael Water District $75,000 $1,943 $76,943 34
City of Roseville $75,000 $8,014 $83,014 37
City of Sacramento $75,000 $24,097 $99,097 44
Placer County Water Agency $75,000 $6,466 $81,466 36
Sacramento Suburban WD $75,000 $7,691 $82,691 37
San Juan Water District $75,000 $1,790 $76,790 34
TOTALS $450,000 $50,000 $500,000 222
Notes:
Maximum reimbursement per rebate per customer/meter/property is $2,250.
Rebates must include turf replacement. Irrigation efficiencies upgrades are optional but recommended.
Reimbursement is for rebates issued between July 1, 2023, and April 1, 2026.
Service connection provider data corresponds to data used to calculate RWA FY 24 Dues.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3453
File #: 0900-02
Title: West Side Tanks and Pump Station Operations Crew Facility – Notice of Completion Contact: Rana Moore 916-774-5581 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.6.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the West Side Tanks and Pump Station Operations Crew Facility Project as complete and adopt a resolution to authorize the Director of Environmental Utilities to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
Given the growth being experienced in the western portion of the City, a need for additional facilities to support Water Utility Operations in that portion of the City was triggered. This led the City to require a new Operations Crew Facility to house water distribution operations personnel, provide space for the storage and maintenance of materials, equipment, and vehicles, and help shorten service response times for Water Utility customers on that side of the City. The decision was made to locate this facility on the West Side Tanks and Pump Station site.
On October 6, 2021, City Council awarded a Design-Build Contract to Diede Construction, Inc. after a competitive proposal process. The Crew Facility consists of a 6,000 square foot metal building with approximately 50% of the floor space built as staff work areas, offices and a conference room, and 50% as a high-ceiling two-bay mechanic shop. The City’s Environmental Utilities Department completed final inspection of the project on June 19, 2024, and found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and specifications, punch list items are complete, and the project is now ready for acceptance.
FISCAL IMPACT
A Design-Build Contract was awarded to Diede Construction, Inc. in the amount of $2,998,700.
City Council also approved an allowance to pay contract change orders of up to 10% of the value of the contract ($299,870). There were a total of twelve (12) negotiated change orders during construction for items requested by the City, which included such changes as floor plan revisions, sewer point of connection revisions, and additional electrical outlets in the mechanic shop, for a total change order cost of $160,818.53. The final contract value is $3,159,518.53.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the West Side Tank and Pump Station was previously evaluated in the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2008032115), certified June 15, 2016. Construction of the West Side Tank and Pump Station and ancillary facilities is within the scope of the project covered by the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan Final EIR. The EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including specifically addressing potable water storage and potable water storage tank location on the West Side Tank and Pump Station and ancillary facilities project site. Because the project is consistent with the Amoruso Ranch Specific Plan Final EIR, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Amoruso Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the project.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rana Moore, Associate Engineer
Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-268
Notice of Completion
RESOLUTION NO. 24-268
ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE WEST SIDE TANKS AND PUMP STATION OPERATIONS CREW FACILITY PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DIRECTOR
TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the West Side Tanks and Pump Station Operations Crew Facility Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.
2. The Environmental Utilities Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
PLEASANT GROVE BL
F DI D
Y
M
E
N
T
R
D
B
ROOKSTONE DR
W
E
ST
PA
R
K
D
R
DEL WEBB BL
HAYDEN PW
FEDERICO DR
SUN CITY BL
B OB DOYLE DR
SOLAIRE DR
W
E
S
T
PA
R
K
D
R
HARVEY WY
MONUMENT DR
CRAWFORD PW
EXHIBIT A
WEST SIDE TANKS AND PUMP STATION OPERATIONS CREW FACILITY VICINITY MAP ¯
PROJECT
LOCATION
4501 WESTPARK DR
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3452
File #: 0800-02
Title:
Water Forum Successor Effort – Interagency Agreement for Cost Sharing for FY2024-25
Contact: Sean Bigley 916-774-5513 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.7.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the FY2024-25 interagency cost-sharing agreement for City of Roseville’s continued support of the Water Forum Successor Effort, and adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute this as well as future Water Forum cost-sharing agreements based on specified conditions and upon recommendation by the City Attorney.
BACKGROUND
On March 15, 2000, the Roseville City Council agreed to the Water Forum comprehensive plan through approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Roseville agreed to support the Successor Effort through the life of the agreement.
The Water Forum process established two co-equal objectives:
• Provide a reliable and safe water supply for the region’s economic health and planned development through the year 2030; and
• Preserve the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the Lower American River.
To accomplish these objectives an integrated package of actions was developed. This action plan contained seven elements:
1. Increased surface water diversion.
2. Alternative water supplies to meet customers’ needs while reducing diversion impacts on the Lower American River in drier years.
3. An improved pattern of fishery flow releases from Folsom Reservoir.
4. Lower American River Habitat Mitigation Element.
5. Water Conservation commitments.
6. Groundwater Management Element.
7. Water Forum Successor Effort.
Approval of the FY2024-25 interagency cost-sharing agreement will allow the City of Roseville to maintain its commitment to the Water Forum and its mission.
Additionally, the interagency cost-sharing agreements have not changed in form and substance over the many years except for the dollar amount obligation for the City of Roseville and changes in the fiscal year date. Given the routine nature of this annual Water Forum cost-sharing agreement, staff is requesting City Council authorize the City Manager to approve future Water Forum cost-sharing agreements if: (1) there are no substantive changes to the content of the interagency cost-sharing agreement, as verified by the City Attorney; (2) the annual cost share agreement does not exceed the following not-to-exceed amounts below; and, (3) sufficient budget has been appropriated to cover the amounts specified in each fiscal year’s cost-sharing agreement.
Proposed Future Water Forum Cost-Sharing Agreements – Not-to-Exceed Amounts FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2029-30 $ 101,161 $ 102,678 $ 104,219 $ 105,782 $ 107,369 $ 108,979 If any of the three above conditions cannot be met, staff will return to the City Council to obtain the appropriate authorizations as it pertains to the annual Water Forum cost-sharing agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT
Total costs under this FY2024-25 interagency cost-sharing agreement for City of Roseville’s continued support of the Water Forum Successor Effort is $101,161. The cost share amount for the City of Roseville is budgeted in the FY2024-25 Water Administration budget in the Water Operations Fund, which is funded by water utility rate revenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of the Water Forum Successor Effort – FY2024-25 Cost Share Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Assistant Director Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-267
Water Forum FundingAgreement - FY 2024-25
RESOLUTION NO. 24-267
APPROVING AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR COST-SHARING, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Interagency Agreement for Cost-Sharing the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Water Forum Successor Effort Budget of the Sacramento City-County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute future Water Forum Cost-Sharing Agreements based on specified conditions and upon recommendation by the City Attorney.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Interagency Agreement
For Cost-Sharing the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025
Water Forum Successor Effort Budget of the
Sacramento City-County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on July 1, 2024, by and among Sacramento County; Sacramento County Water Agency; City of Roseville; City of Folsom; Placer County Water Agency; San Juan Water District, and the City of Sacramento (on behalf of the Sacramento CityCounty Office of Metropolitan Water Planning and the Water Forum).
The parties to this agreement, in consideration of the mutual obligations set forth herein, agree as follows:
Section I.
Operating Budget Cost-Sharing: The cost-sharing partners of the Water Forum identified below have each agreed to pay a pro-rata amount of the total costs for funding the Water Forum Successor Effort (hereinafter referred to as “WFSE”) activities (based upon their number of active water connections as of December 31, 2023, or a negotiated amount), as set forth below for the period of July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025.
Water Forum Successor Effort (Fund 7103)
Cost-Sharing Partners
FY 24-25
Cost Share Amounts
Sacramento County - Zone 13 266,989
City of Sacramento 297,283
City of Roseville 101,161
City of Folsom 50,301
Placer County Water Agency 23,970
San Juan Water District in Placer County 15,303
Sacramento Municipal Utility District 21,123
El Dorado County Water Agency 9,297
Total: 785,429
Section II.
Reimbursement: The Sacramento City-County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning (hereinafter referred to as “CCOMWP”) shall administer all consultant agreements and other expenses incurred during FY 2024-2025 for the WFSE. The parties agree to reimburse the CCOMWP for their share of such costs, up to the amount set forth for each party in Section 1, above, within 30 days after receipt of invoices.
On behalf of the CCOMWP, the City of Sacramento Finance Department will invoice each costsharing partner at the beginning of each fiscal year quarter, except in those instances where the cost-sharing partners have mutually agreed to be invoiced in another time period (i.e., one annual invoice). It is understood and agreed that although this agreement only pertains to reimbursement for costs incurred during the period from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025, the WFSE will extend past June 30, 2025. Any reimbursement of costs incurred by CCOMWP after June 30, 2025, would be governed by a new or amended cost-sharing agreement.
Section III.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District and the El Dorado County Water Agency: Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) and the El Dorado County Water Agency (EDCWA) have entered into separate agreements with the City of Sacramento (on behalf of the Sacramento City-County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning and the Water Forum Successor Effort) to pay their share of the costs identified in Section II, above, up to the amounts set forth for SMUD and EDCWA, respectively, in Section 1, above.
Section IV.
Changes in Terms: Any changes to the terms of this agreement shall be approved by all parties and shall be effective when reduced to writing and signed by all parties.
Section V.
Indemnity: Each party shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the other party or parties, its officers and employees from any actions, liability, or other expenses (including reasonable attorney fees) for any damages or injury to persons or property, occurring by reason of any negligent or wrongful act or omission by the indemnifying party, its officers or employees under this agreement.
Section VI.
Independent Contractors: All contractors employed during any phase of the Water Forum Successor Effort are independent contractors. Contractor employees assigned to perform contract work related to the Water Forum are and will remain employees of the contractor and will not be considered employees of any of the signatory agencies for any reason.
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
Sacramento County Water Agency,
an agency created pursuant to the Sacramento County Water Agency Act By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Director, Department of Water Resources
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Sacramento County Counsel
ATTEST:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Clerk of the Sacramento County Water Agency
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
City of Sacramento, a municipal corporation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Deputy City Attorney
RECOMMENDED:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: CCOMWP Executive Director
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Department of Utilities Director
APPROVED:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Assistant City Manager
For: City Manager
ATTEST:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Assistant City Clerk
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
City of Roseville, a municipal corporation
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Environmental Utilities Director
ATTEST:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Clerk
5/6/24
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
City of Folsom, a municipal corporation
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Manager
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Environmental & Water Resources Director
APPROVED AS TO FUNDING:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Finance Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Attorney
ATTEST:
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: City Clerk
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
Placer County Water Agency
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: Director of Resource Management
Section VII.
Single Agreement: This Interagency Agreement may be signed in multiple counterparts, which together will constitute a single Interagency Agreement. This agreement is executed as follows:
San Juan Water District
By: __________________________ Date: ___________________ Print Name: General Manager
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3450
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.8.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities, CWJ #191054, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Knuthson, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-265
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map 1 of 2
Final Map 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 24-265
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Sierra Vista - Federico recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 6, AND BOOK GG of Maps, Page 55 in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Solaire Phase 6 Santucci Boulevard Offsite Utilities.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on rollcall:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3442
File #: 0400-04-18
Title: Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3 - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.9.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3, CWJ #190956, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Knuthson, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-259
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-259
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND
ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Painted Desert Drive - Phase 3 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Campus Oaks recorded in Book DD of Maps, Page 47, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Painted Desert Drive - Phase3.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 17th day in July 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
BooK D OFMAPS, PAGE L/_]
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OfrER OFFICER COMPLETLNG HS CERTLFICATE WRFIES ONLY HE DINIITY OF frE LNDIVDUAL WHO SIGNEO TIE
DOCUMENT TO W]ICH ffS CERTIFCATE IS ATfACHED, AND NOT frE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALID IY OF frAI DOCUMENT.
OWNER'S STATEMENT
TTI UNDERS GNED EEREBY CERNFY THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVNC ANY RECORD T]LE NTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUOEO WTH]N }IS LARGE LOT F]NAL MAP OF CAMPUS OAKS, AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT
TO THE PREPARATON AND RECORDING OF THIS LAFGE LOT FNAL MAP OF CAMPUS OAKSi AND THEY OF|ER FOR DED CAION HEREON AND HEREBY
DEDIC TE TO TIIE PUBLLC FOR TIII HEREINAITER OESCRBTD PURPOSES' THE FOLLOWNG:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED EELOW S IRR€VOCABLY OFFERED FOR OEDCATON LN FEE FOR PUELIC PURPOSES:
A SMEETS NEW MIADOWS DRIW, HP WAY, CRIMSON RIDCE, PANTED DESERT
DRIVE, WOODCREEK OAKS BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS PARKWAY (INCLIDING
ALL IMPROVEMENTS TIEREON) AS SHOWN HEREON ARE RREVOCABLY OFFERED IOR DTO]CATON AS PUELIC RIOilT OF WAY.
8. AS PUBLLC R GHT OF WAY PURPOSES ON, OVTR. AND ACROSS THOST SffiIPS OF LAND SHOS HEREON AND DESGNAED "'O'D."'
C. LOTS A, C, AND G FOR PARK PURPOSES.
D. LOTS D AND E FOR OPEN SPACE PURPOSES,
E, I,OTS 8 AND F FOR PASEO PURPOSES AND OPEN SPACE.
F, LAI 24 AS A WELL S]TE.
G. LOT 6 AS A FIRI STATON SITEIBE REAL PROPERTY DISCRBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMTNI FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
H PIBLC UNLITY TASEMEND FOR ThE INSTALLA]ION AND MAINTENANCI OF' BUT NOT I MITED TO, WA[R, CAS, SANITARY SEIR P PES AND
APPURTENANCES PERTAINNG THTRETO, ANO FOR UNDERCROUND WRES AND CONDUI]S AND ABOVE GROUND APPURENANCES PERTAINNG BERETO FOR ILECTRIC. TTLEVSION, AND TELEPI]ONE SERVICES AND IOR TRAFFC
CONMOL APPURTENANCES ON, OVER, UNDER, AND ACROSS HOSE STRPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND OES CNAEO "P'U'E'" (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENI).
I, SEWER EASEMENTS FOR PIPELINE PURPOSES AND ]NCIDENIALS frEREIO'
INCLUDNC BUI NOT LIMITED TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF A GRAVITY OR PRTSSURE SEWR LINE, ]OGETER WTH THE RIGH] OF
INGRESS AND TGRESS UPON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS A STRIP OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED,'SEWER EASEMENT"
J. PUALIC EASEMTNTS TOR THt PASSACE OF PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ]OGENER
WTI ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAIN NG THERETO ON, OWR ANO ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON ANO DESIGNATID A5 "P.E." (PEDESIR AN EASEMENT).
END OF PUBLIC DTDICATIONS
BBC ROSEVILLE OAKS, LLC, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LABILTY COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THS LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF CAMPUS OAKS WAS PREPARED BY ME, OF UNDER MY D]RECTION, AND. IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURWY IN CONFORUANCE WTH ftlE REQURL-VENTS OF +lE SUBDIVISON MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE. AT THE REOUEST OF BBC ROSEVILLE OAKS LLC IN AUGUST, 2O]5.
I HEREBY S]ATE frAT THIS LARGE LOT FINAL MAP SIASTANIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ENTAIW MAP] THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN BEREON ARE OF ffE CHARACER AND OCCUPY frE POSITIONS INDICAID 8Y NOWMBIR 1, 2017 AND }IAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFF]CLINT TO ENABLE BE SURVEY TO AE RETRACED.
couN,Y or flACef
o' ftrttfbprl0, t6l5 sr roor w. {ptnory0 ffCKg NorAR' I uBLc orRqo\Ar-) oppr ,"ro Sf?0hUl L. .l,t5 tloldtftr
GU PRO[O IO MI O\ IdL bASS OI \AISTA' IORY LV'DE\CI 'O BL 'hT PERSON{g WHOSE NAME(A) IS/ff SUBSCRIBIO TO THE WNIN INSNUM[NT AND ACKNOIEDGED fO ME NAT HFCHE/Jffi EXECUTED THE SAMT N HSIHEV+ffi AUTtsoBtzED cAPAclrY(lE AND THAT BY Fs/l€ft1fl# S]GNATURE€I ON THE NSNUMENT THE PERSONOE) OR IHE ENNTY UPON EEHALF OF WHCH TtsE PTRSON(S} ACTED, EXECUED THE INSTRUMENI CERTLFY UNDER PENALTY OT PERJURY UNDER HE LAWS Of THE STAI
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
TARY PUBLLC, STATE OF CAL]FORNIA
ANDREGG GEOMANCS
/^).- - rt(O xQ,' tl-os-zbtq
offiLTCENSt EXPLRES: A9/34/2411
ITY CLERK'S STA
L tsERE8Y CERTIFY BAT TBE CITY COUNC L, C]TY OF ROSEVLLE, HAS APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF ''LARCE LOT F1NAL VAP OF CAMPUS OAKS-' AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEFALF OF TFE PUBLIC, SUBJECT IO IMPROVEMEN]'
THE EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDCANON, BUT HAS REJECTED AT
THIS TIME ON EEHALF OF THE PUBLLC, BUT RESERWS THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT AT A LATER DATE, ALL }]E LRREVOCABLE OFFERS OF DEDICAT ON IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE ERMS OF THOSI OFFERS RE C} COUNCIL HAS ALSO APPROVED ]HE AEANDONMENT OF THE RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS LIS[D HEREON.
4 .n-i )
tzlnl, 61e1,4^Ytra-/
DitE ,fp C|ER.. C t. 0r pOStVLtt
8Y:
ASSSIANT Cry CLERK, CITY OF ROSEV]LLE
puBLrc AGENCY &ECONVEYA!'|CE CERTIFICATE
PIRSUANT TO SECT]ON 66477.5 OT THE SUBDVSION MAP ACT, SHOULD TIl[ CITY OF ROSEVLLT DE]ERMLNI THAT THE PUBLIC PURPOST FOR WHCH LOTS 6 ANO 24 ARE DEDCATED NO LONGTR EX]STS, THE CLry OF ROSEVILLE SHALL RECONVEY THE PROPERTY TO BE GRANTOR, WI]OSE CURRENT ADDRESS IS LISTED 8TLOW, OR IO THIR SUCCTSSOR(S) IN ]NTIREST.
SUBDIVDER: BBc RoSEVLLE oAKS, LLc, AN LLLINOIS LIMTED LlABlLry COMPANY ADDRESS: lJO DIAMOND CREEK PLACE, SE 1, ROSEVLLE, CALIFORNA 95747 clw E!q!xEEqQlrAIEt{lENI
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAW EXAMINED THIS LARCE LOT FNAL MAP OF CAMPUS OAKS AND FIND IT TO Bt SUBSTANTLALLY TE SAME AS THE TENTATVE MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALERATIONS THIREOF; frAT ALL PROVISONS OF TH€ SUEDVSION MAP ACT ANO ALL APPLICAELE CIfr
ORDINANCES HAW BEIN COMPLIED WTE,
,-;y< ,-41 r.l,l.
VARC STOUT, RCE 69879 OATE
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROS€VLLE
LcENSE EXPIRES: 9/f,0l2016
I HERTBY SIATE ffAT I AM SANSFIED HAT frS LABGE LOT FINAL MAP OF CAMPUS OAKS IS ECHNICALLY CORRECT.
FOR MARC STOUT, CIfr ENGNEFR, CIry OF ROSEV]LLE
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP EAMPIJS OAKS
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTroNs 20 &29, T,11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG GEOiVr"A"rtcs
8oo{oo'7072
'HEET
1 oF tl
BY
*tq lP-esladrv. fllqrtbt"
PRNT NAME AND Ti[I
x:\cJo\j444910\d*q\144491ofl dwq r2lo3l1s 1o:JJ:oem, robj
RECORDER'S
ACCEPTED FOR RECORD AND FILED IN frE OFFCI OF THE COUNTY RECORDIR OF PLACIR COUNTY, STATE OF CAL1FORN A, IFIS I3: DAY Af I2K!5.bLT 2O]5 AT 3J,O:IM IN EOOK PP OF MAPS AT PAGE 4'
PLACER COUNTY RICORDS, AT frE RIOUEST OF ANORIGG GEOMANCS.
J1M MCCAULEY
qt44f,R EOUNTY RECOsDER
r.--la',w
pEPUTY /
FLE NAt zQJ.U=QitAt4L_- Ba:
BOOK DO OFMAPS,PAGE U1
NOTES
]. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOM HEREON ARI IN FEET AND OECIVALS BEREOF,
2. CROSS ACREAGE OF frE SLT SHOW HEREON IS 149,91+ AC,
J. THE FILING OF TBIS VAP CRTAES 32 LARGE LO]S.
' erur olxs I BouwaRo
,l
:I
l
-
L
__t -f
I
fr
,,,,,/,,
I
LEGEND
O . FoUND sEcnoN coRNER, oUARTER coRNER AS NomD
O . FoUNO STaNDARD clfr MoNUMENT lN MoNUMENT mLL
,/ . Fo!ND 3/4,' IRON PIN Wfr COPPER COLLAR STAMPED L5EJ71 . , FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTEO
@ . sET STANDARo crfr MoNUMENT lN MoNUMENT wLL STAMPED 1s4751 I . stt J/4" RoN PrN wfr coPPER CoLLAR STAMPED 154751
O . D]MENSON POINT'NOHING FOUND OR SET
I.O.D. . IRREVOCAALE OFFER OF DEDICATION
P.U,E. , PUEL]C UTILIfr EASEMENT
P.E. . PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
(oa) . o\tRALL DLMENSTON
(]) . RECORD PER J5 PM 75, PCR
l8
lp ,
i-9
-13 5; '*3{
tq*" '-
lH
THE FOLLOWNG DOCUMENfS CONTAIN EASEMENTS BAT MAY AFICI NE PROPERfr SHOm HEREON| BE LOCAnON OF ffilCH ARE NOT DEFINED THEREIN:
201]-0039391, REFERS TO "GRANT OF ACCESS EASEMilT A5 STAID IN BE PARAGRAPH ENUMERAED .4," OVIR PARCEL 4 OF 34 PM 7J AND FOR BI BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 OF SAID 34 PM 73,
201]_0053955. REIRS TO "EASEMENTS Fffi STORM WAER DRAINAGE SYSEMS' OWR PARCEL 4 OF 34 PM 73 FM HE BENEFIT OF PARCELS ], 2 ANO 3 OF SAIO 34 PM 7J
PURSUANT TO SECIq 66499.20.2 OF frE GOWRNMINT CODE, LOE 1, 2, 3 AND 4 AS SHOM ON frE CERTA|N PARCEL MAP ENTIIED -CAMPUS OAKS, FILED FOR RTCORD IN BOOK J5 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGT 75, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS. ARE HEREBY MERGED AND RESUBDLYDED AND
THE FOLLOSNG PUBLIC EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY ARE HEREBY
AAANDONEOI
A. frE SNEEN NEW MEADOWS DRIW AND PA]NTEO OISERT DRIVE.
B. PUALIC UNLITY EASEMENTS DESIGNAIO "P.UE,".
C. PEDESRIAN EASEMENTS DESIGNAED AS -P.E,-.
{
I
;lll
NEWFIDDY
100 400 12aa GF_I 0 200 800
BASIS OF BEARINGS EXHIBIT
SCALE:1 =2000'
.GRID D STANCES
MONUMENT N WELL
IN BLUI OAKS BLVD
I
-_-l
I
3 &_g-;:
L;H>
IrJlLOT OESIGNATION REVISIONS
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP GAMPIJS clAKSi
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75. PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTtoNS 20 &29, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG
cEoA AT'ICS
8oo{oo-7072
'HEET
2 oF 11
F \", " rnousrf
,/.
clTY or RogEVrLfE
?001 -o1305901
FND 2" OPEN
RON PIPE
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BASIS OF tsEARINGS FOR IB]S MAP IS NAD 8f,, CALFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSEM, ZONI 2, EPOCH DATE 2010, BASED ON CPS T]ES IO BE CALIFORNA HICH PRECSON GEOOEIIC NETWORK (HPGN) STATONS INDUSTRIAL (PID 0H653f,) AND NEWFDDY (PID_DLg]85) USLNG frE PUELISHED DATA LISTED BTLOW PER THE NANONAL CIODENC SURIY (NCS):
STANON LANTUDE LONGITUDE NORTHING(US FT) EASTNG(US FT) CONVERGEICE ttousmtar :e+:'zz.+oo4f,9 N 1211aJ0.176510'W 2,O50,111-922 6,758,79J.906 00'2609.8 NEWF|DDY 3a'47 44.654500"N 121'21'J1.+63240"W 2,O52,258.2a5 6,744,425.21A 00'24 15-5" x:\cJD\r4491oVwq\l44a91oru.d*9, 12/16/15 12:01:56pm, p3tt'c *r':.,,,
BOOK D T'\ OF MAPS, PAGE q -7
F
u
u
I
a
u
uq
SEE SHEET 4
LOT 23
16.5A+AC
IEG_ENp
d> . FOUND SECNON CORNER, OUARTER CORNER AS NOTEO
O . FoUND STANOARD crrY MoNUMENT tN M0NUMENT wELl-
/ . FOUNo 3/4" RON PtN WtH COPPER COLLAR STAUPID LSaJ71 . . FOUNO MONUMENT AS NOED
O . SEI STANDARD CITY MoNUMENT IN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED 15475] ,o' . srr J/4' RoN plN wtrH coppER col-l-AR srAMPE0 LS475l O . DIMINSION PONT_NOIHINC FOUND OR SET
I,O.D. . IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICANON
P.U.E. . PUALIC UILJry EASEMENT
P-E, PEDESMIANEASEMENT
(oA) . owRALL DTMENSION
(1) . RECORD PER 35 PM 75, PCR
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP
GAM]TLIS} trlAKSI
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARCEI-S 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTioNs 20 &29, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG
GEOIr'/TA-rlCS
aooioo-7072
sHLEr J oF 11
=
LOT'G'
2.41 + AA
20'PG&E EASEMENT
2A14 4054754
C]TY OF ROSI.V]LLE
?oo a -oo 00 395
N09 19 l5 E(t
NOl 3O'JO W(
J5.2J (
N08'53',r6"E(1
30.02-(1
t-\
"t"ll) "bt
lo -l
ll
---
-----
-1--*1---
/o o.r& T I
ANCBOR EASEMENT - 10'!
llFWLETT PACK.a.RD CO
PARCEL ]
34 PM 73
I
t-
;llu ,->j
-
te- d;\
I tat"a
N47-56 tO W(l
87 87 (r)
FND 2" OPEN
IRON P]PT
21 28
20 IO'PG&E EASEMEN] N]814'14 W(1
74.J5 (1
.427 0R 100 500
-_l
r:\cJo\14449r0\dvq\1444s10tu,d*q.12l15/r5 t:a2.22pn, psrerc 15 PM 1f,g C]TY OF ROSEVlLLE
3Aa5 - 6lt 6
FND 5/a'REBAR
HEWLEII PACKARD CO
PARCEL ]
34 PM 73
C] IY Of ROSLVILLE
zaaa-oo603s5
N89 461 0"E(1)
J1O.OO (r)
LOT'D'
N8s 4b ro"t( ) j o.o0 (r)
29' LOT'D' noo:z s+'w(r) l
o un*1t^
^. ". ..l"t.l:1,'J') i I 20,PG&E EASEMINT
2ota-oosaTsa - , :i
Ne6 rc"E (1) tra$ qL m
BOOK D T1 OF MAPS. PAGE 4 -7
lJ0t w 69f,.86
LOT 21
2.l5lAC
7 06'46
b?.Or- N89'JJ0J L 679 2'
L=58.oJ LOT'B'
No'04'28"w o'gotAc
F6!t14" S89 J3'o3 w 679.60
L " Lor22
2.J5+AC
R=3oo.oo, LOT 25 :
d-25 Ja'21" 6 2114c
20' PG&L FASFVFN] ' sl316 f7"E
1i:: ii- - 2o14-oo54154
I
B
Y
c
3li
20 80 . 240 EFEF_-I
o 40 160
LEGEND
+ . FOUND SECTION CORNER, OUARER CORNER AS NOIEO
O . FoUND STANDARD ctry MoNUMENT lN MoNUMENT ELL
/ . FoUND J/4' RoN P]N wIfr COPPER COLLAR STAMP€D LS8J71 . , FOUND MONUMENT AS NOED
@ . sET STANoARo cI} MoNUMENT N MONUMENT yELL STAMPED 1s475] F . SEI J/4" IRON PIN Wft COPPER COLLAR STAMPED 154751
O . DMENSION POINT NOftING FOUND OR SET
I.O.O. RREVOCABLE OFTER OF DEDICANON
P.U,E. . PUBL]C UILITY EASEMENT
P E. . PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
(OA) . OWRALL DIMENSION
(1) oFcoRD PrR 15 PM 75. PcR
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP CAMPIJS clAKSi
SU BDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcfloNs 20 & 29, T.1t N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DEGEMBER 2015
ANDREGO cEo*|\ -A-rtcs
E00{00-7072
SHEET 4 OF 11
l: *t
24 1
1 2.5' PUt
&PE
o
E
I
t
;l|I
I r2.s0'PUE
-l ,,'
E
Y
;l
iil
-l LOT 'C'
2.21 I AC
R=500.00'
F6'08 24"
L=53.58'
s7912 56 E
-R=500.00'
85 47 12
N78'36 4J"E
50.4A '-
i
_LI___
46-t.O.D.
R-500.00
SEE DETAIL'B'
ON SHEET 5
_ __l
R=5lLOO
A=15'36'4J"
L=1 41 .42
Na9'36 2A E
1 40.98
"T
@
F
U
u
Iq
u
uq LOT'A
5 70+AC
R=500.00 F10.03'48, I
&tJ4956 r=nrs: \
L=l /0.71 r.:rrlo.t \
saz38 05"W
120.42
A=19'51 00"
L=11 J.22 NoJsr4"w I
r72.36'(04)
j
46',t.O.D *l
L=90.45'
s4 40 08"w
Lj"r'_,,]
32a OJ' NORIH 6.2a
-
[- rd__J
o
U
o
\2Nu-iJ
I
16.01_.
NO9 JE 20"W(1)-.
98.er (1 )(OA)
CTTY OI ROSIVJLLE
200a-oo6039 5
N89l30l"E lOrl t2(oa)
LOT 23 I
t6 5A+AC
SEE SHEET 3
\cJD\11149ro\dye\j44491oil d*s, 12 /16 /15 12
BOOK PN OFMAPS, PAGE 4-7
I
9 F
U
U
6 uq
q
l
JO;:l
i'i.]U [io
o;
i.gF.'
ai
- N2115 56'E SEE SHEET 7 12,5, PUE I
apr -'
LOT 20
6.10+AC
N89'33'oJ"E 81r.58 (OA)
\=;;
,'11",,) 8!r'\\
TE)
, r
Ns9 OJ O4"W(r)
I 85.68 (r)
Nag 46'10 E(
, C]TY OF ROS'V]LI,E I e-oo I -oo994 96
I
x:\CJD\1a44910\drq\14419rotu,J*e, 12103/15 l0:5r:0Jom, robJ LOT 15
4.72! AC
CAMPUS PARKWAY
LOT 16
4_a9aAC
CAMPUS PARKWAY
{
I
;Ii
LOT 14
9,7A1AC
LOT'F'
1.J2tAC
R=500.04
F6 0E'24"
+o o o. 1i s,iiili:r
5.1 56
500.00
E5'471z', L=so.so N
N78 J6',4J"E | |
50.48'-
-l
|
- -
JO' SAN TARY
SEWR EASEMENT
34 PM 7f,
\ z.:srnc
!e; oo +o- I L=02.07
62.03',
fuk=f+'"
N89'3303 E 679.21'
il >'-
N84'15'Jl"W(t)
i i s1 8s'(1)
I L=s8_OJ LOT 'B'
0.90tAc
'14" Sag lJ 0
N6t7 J9"E
/ s3.10'
r-- 21
I tot zz
2.f,s+AC
694.21'
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP EAMPIJS ctAKSi
SUBDIVISION No. PL1 4-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1,2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTtoNs 20 &25, T.11 N.. R.6 E.. M.D.B.M.
50.OO ( r )
CII-Y OF ROSEV]LLE
zCO A - OO 603 95
41.95',
R=JO0.O0
&25 38 21
\ L=1J4.25' ' st316 J7 t
\rJr.rr'
LOT 25
6.?1 tAC
LOT 23
I 6.54+AC
N1 r'24 46"W(r)
E4 r6 (1)
N09'J8 20"W(1
98.sl(1 X0A)
SEE SHEET 3 CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG cEot\r.A'rrcs
800400-7072
DETAIL'B'
SCALET l =30
sftEET 5 0F 11
----ILl
, w \D.4 _ L- -,,.. . *o'd-tdl-
---S'+,;; : I I ". 'oo i
f c#-t e.o! l ; "o IUU
I
r T\ | I e s0000{
1!ry+t-s
* t;-;;; f:,q?#." *.._g',i.;,
0N \ ils sHEEr F15J6'4J" L=12o.7r ss:u,ii,i"i \
--^41 42 582.1805'+ R/ /r.
Naq J6 2a_t pa.42'
140.9E, R=500.o0,
&19'51'OO
L=1t 3.22 LorA ,)99.15^\ I
5 7o+Ac
ou' ,.0.0. -]
lr,
-
b L=90.45'
'$in I s4 40 oa"* l
,\
\ -L- -Ln'i--.l - l)180J NoPr628---
I s89 JJ'oJ"w to:z.so'(ory
t
r -l--l--
L l L46 loD
LOT'C'
R=26.00 R=26.00
&87 2r'18 &87'28'59" L:39.64 1=J9.70
S4407 J5 E N4JtT JJ'E J5.S1 JS.95'
R-4al -00
F5 09 41'
L=4J.J4'
N89 f,6 55"E
43.32',
BOOK N CA OF MAPS, PAGE L-/ --7
,
SEE SHEET 8
-..- n=soo.oo
E2'22'1A"
L:20.68
Nt'58 02 W
2a.6a
DETAIL'C'
SCALET 1"=30
l5.oo
F86'49 JJ
L=51.04'
s89!7',4t"W
48.1 1''
=970.50
F69 J5 26"
L=1 1 78.76
ssf, 49 27 E
\ 1 07.62 LOT 11
t7.64tAC
\ aJo'PUE&PE
R]O FOOTJ]]LL LLC
PARC:.I. 2,
34 PM 73
2A 1 2-aA92937
R=87.00 -
E 49',42 0:
u R=50J.OO
$ err'+z'os"
',?'ii
1 25' PUE & PE
- 25, PUE & PE ) ,:ji
29.51 1-l
L-75.47
N65 J5'56'W
7 512
R=497 0O \
&14t 3 28',
L=1 2J.19
N4 08 J0"E
n=zro oo 5l? ?1,i2
:::-."-i" ss6 40 le"w
'!.loY,/..* zz oz {oar
I r 7.s8 LR=234 oo
_-J0.29
-- n=ss.Og,
&82 J6 48"
t9.00'L:50_60'
sJT J9 Ja W
46.J2
\ e20 s81r"
\ L=85.64 ' s45?02 E
\ E5.r 6'
-R=5O0.OO
CURVE TABLE
RADIUS DILIA LENCTH EEARING DIS] 117.00 26'5J'13' 54.90' S52 11'OO"W 54.40' 117.00 8'59 18' 18.35's70 07'16"w i8.34'
97.OO', 21'34 41', J6.53'.S27.57 03"W f,6.52' 97.00 J0'48 20' 52.15 N]8.22'24',W 51.sf,'. 8J.oo' 7 02 J1' i0_20 s45 57'oa"w 10.19' 99.0o 59'lJ'Jt" t02_JJ S79 05'21"E 97.84' 481.00', t'38 58', 1J.85' N70 2a 24"t 1J.85 519.97 J'07'20" 28.J4' N73'03'.15"E 2a_JJ F14'5412
L=1 J0.06
LOT 17
2.65+AC NO.
C1
C2
CA
c9
ct 0
ct I
c12
Cl J
a
Jtr.
<it:
rSs
j
I
R= 4 79.0O 6 L=laz74
u 55'24'09 W
u 102.56 L=!7.84 814'5412
55'24 09 W
97.6f
24'
LOT 13
4.42! AC
: -S89 31 04'W
| / :e.ar'
B
v
q
o
=
E
Y
Nag 3J 09 E
J9.00
LOT 15
4.72!AC
LOT'C'
2.21+ AC
r . JD\'4s1,0\d"e i44C ca J. ' 2 rb I r? or'\bpr, per! ( R=600.00
Ft4 57 0t "
L=l 56.56'
NE2tt',27-E
1 5€.1 2
R-600 o0 r
F9 02 53"
L=94.75
sl9'1 4 22"W
94_65',
O
O
12 so' pue &PE -l I
244
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP CAMPIJS trtAKSi
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0323
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARGEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS. PAGE 75. PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTtoNs 20 &29, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER GOUNTY. CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG cEoA/tA-rlcs
aoo100-70f7
SHEET 6 OF ]]
LOT 16
4.89aAC
SEE SHEET 4
&49'55',20"
L:A4.52
N24 30'43'E
Lor 10 P, y'
2.51+AC \ -
/
123.47'
R=521.oo -' t
812'43'25 1
L=1r5.70 L=1 I 5.70 1
ts N45331"E I
F 115.46 1
ffi+;r"
/ \. ,o' "ur a ,,
R:1029.50:
Ft6'4449" \
i74s6'26'E L=188 JO
47 44' N56 O0 J6 E
L=f,00.91 \
s55?9'57"t \
299.84'
25' PUE & PE ../ -
LOT 18
4.9ltAC
sas:r'ls wJ I
J8 00 (oA)
sEg JJ 0t"W 69J.79
20'PG&E EASEMENT
201 4-0054754
BOOK K] f) OF MAPS, PAGE _5_7-
[xrsnNc tf- 500'26 56"[ ]20.01 (oA) J25 N89 31 03 E 899.95 (OA)
OAKS BLW
PUBLIC RGHT OF WAY
OED CATION s58'21 {7 W
t0.29
qso.!! "I'l''"Y'-:
N89'J3 0J"r I 92E.95(OA)
DETAIL'D'
SCALE: l'=10
DETAIL'E'
SCALE:1"=30
DETAIL'F'
SCALE: l"=JO
NOO'26 5
LOT 1O
CRIMSON RIDGE
N89'JJ 03 =Jl.00'
500 26 57 E 2.40
R=J].00-
F95'42 J8'
L=51.78
N41 2422"E
45.97 &90'00'oo'
L=44.69-
s45 26 57"E
4J.84',
LEGEND
O . FOUND sEcnoN coRNER, ouARreR coRNER AS NoED
Q . rouro STANDARD crft MONUMENT rN MoNUMENT ffiLL
/ . FoUND J,/4" tRoN prN wtTH coppER coLLAR srAMpED LS837j . . FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
o . sET STANDARD Ctry MONUMENT tN MONUMENT WLL STAMPED LS475l d . sEr J/4" rRoN plN wfr coppER coLLAR STAVPED 154751
O , DIMENSION POINT NOTHNG FOUND OR SET
,O,0. . IRRIVOCABLE OFFER OF OEDICANON
P.U.E. . PUBLC UNLIfr IASEMENI L'S,E LANDSCAPEEASEMENT
P E' , PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
(OA) . OWRALL DIMENS]ON (I] - RECORO PER f,5 PM 75. PCR LARGE LOT FINAL MAP CAMPIJS trtAKS
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTtoNs 20 &29, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG cEo*tvt_A1-tcs
400{00-7072
SHEET 7 OF 11
R=Jl.OO
-- F812.9 5f '
t:47.J4
s45 48 05 W
42.a7
{r;-----
1 248.00 s89-ll 0J w 700 22
JJOJ T /
4e.1a
l
!R=ii7-oo'
WOODCREEK OAKS 8LV ao a1:1:,"
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
OEDICA IION
PER THIS MAP
-14 tM 7l
rr- t/l/'u
.rf --
q/
ot Q/ Or
s/ '/
'1s
/ "rr;'i"E
PT47 29',
a L=60.80
F Nr0'58 50 E
.60ao
-sr9-54 32 W
A=l019 2a"
L=224.a8
LOT 'F'
R:60O.OO
&14'50',08"
N8J-0r'5J"W
154.93 (0A)
224.58',(OA)
E2'40 J7
L=58.J1
N814 47',E
58.J0'
R=5O0.OO
8145412"
R=479 00
L=l 30.06
\ Nzs+oz w
' I 29.69-
F11 4
L-97.44
+ R=476.00
le14's412"
s5 24 09-W I L=123.a]
97.67 I N7 54'02 W
| 12J.46
t :::^-:_i" s56.40 19 W
il.rj,j,.* zz.ozioal
s89'J3',04"W
Ja.at
&14 57',0r "
t.*1 56.56
Na211 27 E
156 12
85.8q
LOT 13
4.42tAC
S6J'OO'JJ"E
21.69 Neg 1J'OJ"[ J5j.24'
&704f,6 _l
l:14.11 1,
s79 09'06'E
14.06 U
U
a
U
u
=v
tr
I
JO'SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
J4 PM 73
15 39"W 710.77
ba'22 44"
N8615 J3"W
87.68',
L=67.60
N7a'50 29"W
67.57 R=600 00
F14'50 06"
s8J 01 52"E
1s4 92 (0A)
N89 33 09 E
J9.00
I
n
R NO,
- c1
;"8FC9
do cil
o ct J
DST
54.40 1 E.34'
l6.J2
51 .53
10. I 9'
97.84 '
I J.85 26-ll'
o
c
z
t
N89 JJ',03
27.2t'
LOT'C'
2.21 !AC _- 12 S PUE
&PE
LJ2tAC
J5'PUT
J4 PM 7J
Nztl 5 56-E
64.5?
xr\cJD\l+4a91o\dws\4a49toFM.d{s, l2losll5 o:,.+,irp..,ou; .\ N45 56 54 W
535.04
20 8o 240 r
0 40 160
LOT 14
9.781AC
LOT 15
4 l2tAC 3
v
d
c
o
f
o
z.
o
LOT 16
4.a9tAC
J4.91
( lE)
SEE SHEET 5
a)
o{o
.fr$ x4!
5 '3
3 <-
LOT 'F'
2a.00
sog o0 sr "w 60 aJ --l l_ 54 .0 D L=g6.22, I R-Jr oe p. Jr uo "ff Offo,l.f, o_ , oo LOT 10 lo.:.s -ail
l egooooor3J^q.a2rE \*** r/ aJ,.0ooo r.laL 9J.5J,
/ L 48b9 t=5r-8 ,\"' .'"-'/, 48..9 10./9
-^^:45.b5 rb4\.7-2.2-"t r\ | , /' :q;zatt. /Ool N82.20t8'\ 'q.u! 4{8! l F1'---\.7 nre+. & pr I r. r, \ f .. .. t !+1 L )r' \ il2.E8
a L,*a -=*:"'"'* l' . t ," ", e 51 ee, \.-f_-{=f in-lt.oo l zo "'r sar.r6J?-w e-6/.00 ' '';;.' A9o00o0 f -l ia-900000 &Pt sn.?4 rAqa2o\"
^ ^ l -.d.bt I,
- uo trt,- N45;6;li; ltr+:+I -a4 J,ror"w Lor '12 \b5 15 56 w / l-,:l"o:.r1. 4Jd4 -1 p,rr'5i. 340+Ac ".iq-,6n Nr'.28 i- ' d_ 14- J 2E 105.74 1 { L=12J.J9 lis.*: /
R-5OJ.0O
a-r:+i os" -
i
| =142 i4
ss z+ os'w
I
102.56
I
I
F7',45',J1" :
L=81 25
1 t1 7.58
-2Ja-O0
\ e2os8li"
\ Lr;9rs;flf.. Lor tz
1 \es.ro' 2651^c
CRIMSON RIDGE
R:31.00'
&90!0 00"
L=48.69'
N45'26 57"W
4t.84
N0026'57"W
'R=Jl.00
F90'00 00'
L=44.69
s44 3J',O3 W
4J.84
s0026'57"E
5.00 5.00'
BOOK O OF MAPS, PAGE L]'_/
SEE DETAIL'L'
ON TI]S SHEET
R=J1.00
&90'28 48"
L=48.95'
N44 47 28 E
_ 44.02,
SEE SHEET 1O
. ^- . LUI J
1 5.20+AC
R=776-00
r 2A oVE & PF &r"06 -.
..--
- L _-tbo.tg
l0Ej18
2a.75
LOT 24
0 J4rAC
AUAL]TY INVESTMENT
PROPERT]25 ROSEVILLE
IAND CONlPANY
35 PM 39
20 1 3-aO5A555
{
I
;l|I
.. | ./l I l->So7 4t Jl E R=824.00 raA'2z4arvA I Q liszo- - ar"obrs rr'r I I | -o_nlo.ro, L-r5c.6s ' I t l/ l e: :o ot Sa4'25 oo'E
-.. oze )o -{-l I '.
-;;;"t- r5s 44
ru 4 J9 15' I it sr'5r 5J L
!:9!"'J-\.f I \ \6aeJ s316 29 E
a3-60
NO2'OAU2.oa.O?"Eyl 02 E , fr \
br 6 \d \" \ t- 20,o.r &or
ll-\,
15 puE & pE -\ \^.\ ,, 1o.s\,\-n=soo.so. \ 1e 5 \_f-R=960 50' te! \ \ ', F7.0929
n-'o,n..o !\ \ - \ \ r-10r950 :;1.:9,?:. r\ \_ \ sn.54.19,E a=cr0s1 \\ \z \ \,i;;" :^.1,,,i99- ,\ -\P- I'." sr2rsoJ"E soJt \k l, K'4 ""^ I.\-\0/a51aw ile.sl '\ {.\ \-'oo.s:
'-" ;;;; \ b :-\".i\ \ Lor 11
o-.Yzs1\"\'r7.64aAc
,,r"*)\ g\ tr \
60 oo \ {_--i\",5\
E '- '"'i ,....,*:\\-*JG \ ,, qIRVE rABLE
il r-or9 "i;",;; t. 1 6\""^ \ \, No. RADrus DELrA LENGTH BEAR Nc DrsT H tE;Ai vu;iis-r \ S")* \ u \- ro puE & pr 3l lll 33: '?8::;:li: ?g ::: :;3.;l;?3:lw :: l:, 7re+Ac s2or','E \ -S."4-: \ \ -
ro puE & pr 3l lll 33: '?!::;.li; ?3 33: 313.1] Y3"W ii.li a --- \t'\$-*"] \ \ cJ 8oo.oo 1r'06'rs" 1s5.04's84'2s'oo'E 1s4 80 I
:
l
20 a0 2q E- o40
d
:
R]O FOOTH]LL LLC
PARCIt,2
34 Pl'/t 73
2A 1 ?-OO929A7
c4 3000.00' o'2a'51" 1A.2A'N09 25'46"E la.2A'
c5 iooo.oo' 4'J0 0a" 7E.58 sa8 l1 5J E 7a.50'
c6 r00o.0o' 7-04 56" t2J.6t sa2'24'21 E 12J.53'
c7 looo.oo' tt'J5'04'2o2.t9 Na4 J9'25"w 201.44'
clo 83.00' 7 02 Jl" 10.20 S45 57 08"W 10.19'
cl1 99-OO'59 1J Jr" 102.JJ S79 05'21"E 97.a4
c12 4ai.00' 1 J8 58" 13.85 N70'28'24"E 13.85'
\ Cl3 519.97' f,'07'20' 26.f,4'N7J'0J'15"E 28 JJ \ 514 971.5a' t'56'52" 33.2J'so2 5J'29"w JJ 2J' \ c15 77.00' 51 12 11" 76.aa' s32'2a'04 \| 7J 72' d=120e54 \\ \ \ \ ur5 L=z2o.j| \ \ \... \ \ c1o 1026.00' 1'2a 45" 2a 49 so2 J9 25 w 26.49 5oo0o, ,.'r=#3u{', \ \>.\ \ ;j; i;; aa' R=soo.oo, s:!.ol::6o"i \\ ?n-.t!'.Zu: 19 \\ \ \ cr7 rs0.00' 2s'54'2E" 7a.JO' N] r'J3'26"w 77.41 82z252a" 22o.2g' .\ l"*-\ \ c1a 1oo 0o' 38'57 f,o" 6a oo N69 l4'03"w 66 69 L=r95.69 R=Js.ooa \ \ i \ \ c20 150 00' 40'04'16" 104'91' s81'06'20 w 102 78 N 4 or'i r'^ &8b 50 57" \, \ \ \ -P 15 O0
1s4.44 1=5r.0s \\ )^ V\ 5:9::..." LINE rABLE sEElqrArLc "-';3:i ) .tr@.,,\ '.;i.tli,"- R-q7o.5o sEElqrArLc "-';3:; ).$P.f.. i;i.ili,"- R-q7o5o 'o -ll^lli'. .9:^ '*i"" Ds- ,i:Till,9,oo .-;j.i?9g, i ' 'zz,fig!;;u^.. l:."N.i . / :::;,".*" ;; i!?:;i:1:,,* 1l::, I'A":X" L=1 1 78.76' 1ts;fri, F2a'.212.1.', L=9J.9+ ' laI V' i,lii-ot", *''::i'"1
/ 7 si1- \ t'-:1:.,...,,, ""1 i
ji:,r,,- '""!1g\.'sio/ (,,,u. \\"' \ \
ro?
t$b.. \
\\ \\]107.62
551 49 27 E
: \ .' ssa zr'+z w- ./ .:i \\--1:::(:Y;
LARGE LOT FINAL MAP
EAMPUS EAKSi
SUBDIVISION No. PL1 4-0373
ALL OF PARCELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 75, PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcT|oNS 20 &25, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREOG GEOtVtATtCS
400400-707?
::T,1.'" 2s prr & oc) -:t;q,,u ,,"nll6;
12.07 (OA)
x \cl0\1444910\dwq\r4449r0tu,dre, l2l16/1s r2:0J:22pm, pote( SEE SHEET 6 SHEET 8 OF ]]
BLUE OAKS ,I BOULDEVARD
PAINTED O'"'*'I __I_r_ f -"u*n "", r,l-
__va +z.og \ Y I-;:
L__--_l__.Be
20'PG&E t I FE
EASEMENT .' I 9d
99-0026799
:Jt.oo',
A=90 00 00'
L=48.69
s45 26 57"[
4J 84 8'PUE & PE
l3-qj
dry"P_tL --'" -l _'1'':
1 I . ".., o ."r.1"*c.ocv.dte. r2l03 .^ or 4\.6,,.. re.
SEEDETAILG & 96o.oJ'
-orl rr|ssE'!:u_ r[s.; oJ
INTED s2ss1'(oA) DESERT
9s8.03',(oA) x
E6r.9s',
847 07 11' R:9
SEE SHEET iI
BOOK r)r\ oF MAPS, PAGE q-7
LARGE lor rrnru uep EAMPLJS ctAKS;
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
*o'g"l_"_:, SECTTONS 20 &2g,r.rr X., n.o i., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER GOUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG cEO*twrATtcs
800{00-7012
LOT 2
I J.r 6tAc
Z0 PUE & PE
-
Na219U9 W.-
__!_:-Y
\ "\ ,, T-1999o -
rJt{lVtFL.rS CIAKS
\ b". ,/ Elllii' SUBDtvtstON No. pL14-0373
\ " ;:"^19*",^l!L-9.FpARcELs 1, 2, 3 AND 4 oF rHE cAMpus oAKS 1; # r pa n c ir_.an p io-&' ii';#;"#i ;H,H#.;:X""^ sl
I
^y') /
IL J/' PUE & PI
I
-TsoTat'Jt "E
| 49.20'
- l R=970.50
I Fl500f"
I L-64 94
| 52'5r'5J"8
U
J
f
o
o
o
Y
:(U
U
o
o
3 'l
I
a
Ir
H
Hi jr
I
i64.eJ
-N16'0J 19"W
l60.ss
\a, \:- \-- 20'pur & pr
I R-e6o 50
. El0929
U
U
q
u
U
a
,k DETAIL'G'
SCALI:1"=J0'
DETAIL'H'
SCAG: ]''=JO'
v
) ^+P I,e%" rl
lt - R=J1.00',
F9000 00"
t=48.69
s45 26 57"8
4J_84
LOT 1O
2.5rtAc
L=96 22'
N65 59'2a"E
95.5J'
10.79 F49 55',20',
L=84.52
N24'JO'4J-E
20 PUt & PE,-t NA2'20',18'W
-L _ 3L44'
u,.u/
8eo.ss, cRtMsoN *
leg::03 e sa95(ql
SEE SHEET 7
244.54, lr-)
R=3r oo l n=:t oo ,:-r \
&9OOOOO" i F9O.OO'O1" rLgooooo" i 69o.ooor- LI L-48 69 o S.4 lJ oJ w ; N4)2!;rb:; '4 0D -
:l4J.d4 q 4J.a+ iI
'ho' ' ;9 LoT6
I r h, 3
1,,] wooocHrix oa*s erw
PUELIC RIGHT OF WAY
lDtDcAiloN PtR HS MAF
-+ 10.
;i-.'WOODCRIIK oAKS BLVD
I PUALIC RICHT S WAY
DEDICANON PER I]IS MAP
| 290 00
fn=roo -l --
---
R= 1_r-nopooo- I &90!0 00" I L 20', zo,cue PUE &901 *;;;i,#i #f=ll 99. - L-4a.6s' & pE L=+iir'-siE-oErar|H 5:""::.t"' n *-2ooo'
- s44.rr'0J w rrs:zo;izii triiii{#* L=4a-6€
,
a:2rr4r8' 4.ra4 .jl;i u"t"l* ;1iil";."-.-^'.L.i' 4f,.84 N38 07',59"W I
8.06 1
28.5 puE & pt -.-l
I
ts' eue a er --\
^=tOan.aO -\ a-o:0 rt \
t=12O oo '
st215 oJ"E \
119 9J
R=1029.50'!
Lor e "i'=:t'"i \
Fl2!9 54'. r \
L=220.71
R=5OO.Oo' SJ5!J'06"[ \
L-22'25 28" 220.29
L*195.69 R-J5.00'
Nl4!l'51"W A=865057'
194 44 1=5J.05
N2,11'26"E
4E 12
; Fa6 oo r6" &20'2f 21'
i tsJ si -
...1--\9?:",_ \ . a ' , i sz: zi'os"r N5s'5J'Js"E
_ a 91 44' 16A22'/
\ s5a2l 47"W- ./. Y-i2:?'(*)
N
LOT 8
8.J7tAC
LINE TABLE
NO. AIARINC DIST Lt N8a.42'49"W 15.06' !2 58t.25 15.W J5.36PAINTEO DESERT R-J1oo 1 /\n=rr.oo A-9o0o 01' \ ,- --, / &9o.oo oo. J8.00 (0^) ;89'JJro1 "w
r-4E.69', A rd.uo(o^) L t="66r'
5 ?6 56'w l?_!!gll{qLf_X s44.rJo. 43.A4 / t9oo"Tl9.oo:\ aj.sa.
Noo ?6 )6 w / | soo.2b,5/ L
'fbr o | .oi'8
PAINTED DESERT
R=J1.00
F9o!o o0"
L=48.69'
R=Jl.O0'
&90'oo'00
L=48.69
s4+f,J OJ'W
43.84'
'57"w
4J.84
N00'26'57'W
5.O0 LOT 9
s00 26'57"E
5.00',
BOOK
T- BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD
.'-.-- ,i eurc;xi eLW I NOO26 56"W(1 )
l--J6.96 (1)
Q roo'zoiso"w(r) t/,-53 oo (1)
I
-J
7O1 rE)
o1 (nF)
BLUE OAKS BLVD
N0o26 s6"W(1)
NS919'2a"E(l) 5J OO (1)
65.16 N891 9'28"E(1)
5.OO (1 )
R-40.00
&9013 J6
t =62.99
N45 3J 44'W
56.68 3
oOU
=6
=
u
z
52.6J
8.OO'PUE
15 PM 1J9
25' PU€
34 PM 7J
9lE_aErA!!_I
ON THIS SHEET
20,PG&E
!AS!!!NI f
L= 45 2/ 12"
L-.19.67
N2J 24 0E W
38 63
1...
lirt;
2014 0054f54
AU t,]TY INVESTMF:NI]
TROIi'.R ]-ILI) ROSEVILLE
IAND COMPANY
PARCIL 3
35 PNl 39
?a | 3-oo5a555
OETAIL'I'
SCALE:1'=r0
CURVE TABLE
RAD I US DELTA LENCTH BEAR NG O I ST J000.00' o'20'57' t6.2E NOg'25 46"t 18.28' 1000.o0 4'f,o 08' 76.5A Sa8'11 sf,-E 7a.56 r0o0.o0 7'04 56' 12J.61' sa2'24'21-E t2J.5J' t0oo.oo ti'J5'04- 202.19 N84'J9'25'w 201.84' tl.aa' 57'12'17" 76.88' s32'29'04-w 7J.72 150.00' 29 54'2a" 78.J0 Nl1'J3 26"W 77-41' 100.00 3a'57'Jo" 6a_00 N69'l4 oJ"w 66.09' r 15.O0 24'f,2'06" 49.25 N22'2J 50'E 4a.a7'
150.00 40'04't6' t04.s1 s8t 06 2o"w t02.7a'
NO.
c5
c6
c7
cl5
c17
c18
c19
c2a
F
u
u
I
a
U
u
@
LOr 2
I J.1 6tAC
25- PUE & PE _
9 I
zo put a pr -l
F90'2a'48'
L=44.95'
N44'47 28"E
44.02 LINE TABLE
NO. BEARINC DIST
L1 N88 42 49"W 45.06',
L2 S8t 25 r5"W J5.J6'
n=zsss.so'L
L-3'1? 23"
LOT 5
r 5.20rac
#.s;'+- _-to
0 40 160
R=776
Fr t'06't 5-
L=1 50.J9'
:i84 25 00 E
--- _rrq19_
NOJ ?1',51 "W
34.9a
R= 1 655.00'-
L=1 65.6J'
N0 55'40'E
165.60'
^(t"
{
I
;[, e1 26 18"L=41.5{'
N9'24 38 E
41.54'
N34 J9 5J t
"='2o.oo -19
52 LARGE LOT FINAL MAP EAMPTJSi ctA}<Si
SUBDIVISION No. PL14-0373
ALL OF PARGELS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE CAMPUS OAKS
PARCEL MAP BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS. PAGE 75. PCR
LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF
sEcTroNs 20 &29, T.11 N., R.6 E., M.D.B.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PLACER COUNTY. CALIFORNTA
DECEMBER 20,I5
ANDREGG GEO*lVlA-rtCS
3oo{oo'7072
sHtET io oF rl
a 54'5J tO
L=1 I 4 95'
N62 06'28"E
N89'58 0A"W
80.57 LOT 4
6.20tAC
I tira.sr;
I N1'23 00"8
I 214.46
l- 2s PUr & Pr
-.. rc.6J /_s87,OO O! E
IqF
LOT 11
BOOK {f OF MAPS, PAGE LJ 7
NO.
C4
c5
c6
C7
.+"l
pl
3 !r'*l
816
=t
DETAIL'J'
SCALE:1-=10
CURVE TABLE
RAD ] US DELTA LENCIH EIAR ] NG D I ST J000.00 0'20 57 18.28'N09.25 46"E 18.28' 1000.00 4'30 0a 78.5E' S88'1 1 '53'E 78.56 1000.00 7'04'56" 12J.61' s82.24 21"8 t2J.5J' 1000.00 11'35 04" 202.19' N84'J9 25"W 201.a4', 115.00 24'J2'06" +9_25 N22'23'50 E 4A.87 DECEMBER 2015
ANDREGG GEOIVIATICS
000400-7072
SHETT 11 OF 11
-l
>, ui
I
@r
ql
Y
Yu, U
6 OL
o
3L
40.5 i
F
U
u
@
u
uq
;l
xl
-
FLI
)
-ls
i
x soo.o:, ' 525 s4'(OA)
pAINTED na,-:r'ir": sso.ulrcar DESERi
SEE SHEET 9
{: \cao\r4449ro\ds9\144401oil.dwg, r2loalts 02: as:56pm, robl
BLUE OAKS BLVD
X
o
X^H;
o
o
o
3 :l
6t
-=-_ -, -_ -_= J nu.;.,ofli.it
L 50' PF
R=1650.00'
e4 57 02"
l=1 42.51
''-;i!;
I
NJ4'J9'5J"Er /
20 PUE & PE _
Na2l9 09"Wr llq
l-
- -
4'l515-
- -
-
r__l_-__-_-- jl----
I 9 L25PUE /
-l
-
* fJ * **=rr-o'r- ,-n"- :o: Y.t
: ' t \ o//
r--r+
-!0.5' | \
-! \ q Jo' RECYCLED WATERLINE
-.]_ro-o'ze'ss"w - 56;fy5|J,,,,
WOODCREEK OAKS BLW I PUBLIC R GHT OF wAY
lDEDrcAnoN PER Hts MAP
I LOTI | 5 45iAa
LNo5 29't9 E
i r20.71
589_tl0t w 489.22
LOT 3
4.941AC
&90'o0 00
L=48.69
s45 26'57 E
4J.84 _ a,
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3428
File #: 0400-04-18
Title: Campus Oaks CO-3 - Notice of Completion
Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.10.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Campus Oaks CO-3, CWJ#190835, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-245
NOC
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-245
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CAMPUS OAKS CO-3 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND
ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Campus Oaks CO-3 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 29 is hereby accepted.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on rollcall:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3439
File #: 0400-04-17-2 & 0400-07
Title: Infill PCL 13 - 1028 Main Street Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Jeff Hendrix 916-774-5463 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.11.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and right of way offered thereon; and
2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
The Development Services Department, Engineering Division, has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 10 residential lots.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of the 1028 Main Street Final Map project is an action that is subject to CEQA.
Project level CEQA compliance for the 1028 Main Street Final Map project was accomplished with preparation of the INFILL PCL 13 – 1028 Main Street Subdivision Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) (Adopted: March 23, 2023) (SCH: 2023010542). Because the 1028 Main Street Final Map project is consistent with the project evaluated in the INFILL PCL 13 – 1028 Main Street Subdivision IS/MND, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the INFILL PCL 13 – 1028 Main Street Subdivision IS/MND will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Hendrix, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-257
SubdivisionAgreement
Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-257
APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ROSEVILLE 10, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Roseville 10, LLC, for the Infill PCL - 13 1028 Main Street Subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE
PRINTED NAME
JOHN C. SCROGGS R.C.E. 26388
ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:
EXPIRATION DATE: MARCH 31, 2026
DATE
No. 26388
CIVIL
JOHN C.SCROGGS
REGISTEREDPROFESSIONALENGINEER
STATEOFCALIFORNIA
Exp. 3-31-26
FINAL MAP OF
T11N R6E, M.D.B. & M
LYING WITHIN PORTION OF SECTION 34,
OWNER'S STATEMENT:
RECORDER'S STATEMENT:
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MY COMMISSION NUMBER:
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS COUNTY
SIGNATURE
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS, OF THE ENTITY UPON
EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY
SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY
BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) ARE
PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE
ON BEFORE ME, , A NOTARY PUBLIC,
COUNTY OF
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED,
THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS BEFORE (DATE), AND THAT THE
THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR AND THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF PAULINE C. VERRIS, ON MARCH 2023,
FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
STREET SUBDIVISION
INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN
BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
DATED
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
COMPLIED WITH.
THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF
STREET SUBDIVISION AND FIND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN R.C.E. #69879 EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/24
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MARC STOUT DATE
FOR MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS FINAL MAP OF INFILL PCL 13 1028 DATE
PLS. #8278 EXPIRATION DATE: 12/31/25
TIMOTHY G. BLAIR
CITY ENGINEER STATEMENT
NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE
PRINTED NAME
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: MY COMMISSION NUMBER:
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS COUNTY
SIGNATURE
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSONS, OF THE ENTITY UPON
EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY
SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY
BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) ARE
PERSONALLY APPEARED , WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE
ON BEFORE ME, , A NOTARY PUBLIC,
COUNTY OF
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PLACER COUNTY RECORDS
FILED IN BOOK C OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 58,
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 6 OF SUBDIVISION MAP
SUBDIVISION NUMBER PL21-0372
REQUEST OF KASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
, 200 , AND RECORDED IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGE , AT THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT MINUTES AFTER O'CLOCK ON THE DAY OF
ACCEPTED FOR RECORD AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF PLACER COUNTY,
DOCUMENT NO
BY DATE
DEPUTY
LAND
ESSI
OR
F
P
EXP. 12/31/25
No. 8278
RVEYOR
SU
A
N I
OF CALIF
STATE
RO
T
IMOT Y G.BLA
IR
H
ONAL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PLACER COUNTY RECORDER
RYAN RONCO
FEE
ITS: PRESIDENT
AARON ROSS
BY:
ALL AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, WITHIN SUBDIVISION.
UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS SO DESIGNATED.
DRAINAGE CHANNEL, AND STORMWATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT FACILITIES UPON, OVER,
THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF GRAVITY FLOW OR PRESSURE PIPE, OR OPEN
PURPOSES AND USES APPURTENANT THERETO, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED THERETO (1) PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (P.D.E.) TO BENEFIT LOTS 1-10 FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE
EASEMENT)
(STREET, BLVD....ETC) AND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY FEET AND TWELVE AND HALF (12.5) FEET WIDE STRIP(S) OF LAND CONTIGUOUS TO THE ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO, ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE TEN (10)
AND FOR ELECTROLIERS, TRAFFIC CONTROL APPURTENANCES, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND OVERHEAD WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION, AND TELEPHONE SERVICES; WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO; AND FOR UNDERGROUND AND
LIMITED TO, WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND GAS PIPES AND DRAINAGE PIPES TOGETHER (1) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF, BUT NOT PURPOSES:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SHOWN HEREON AS MAIN STREET.
(1) AS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY (INCLUDING IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREET THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:
MAP OF INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION, AND HEREBY OFFER FOR
AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL
RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION,
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY OFFERED HEREON.
ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND THE RIGHT OF WAY THIS FINAL MAP OF INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN STREET SUBDIVISION AND HAS ACCEPTED
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED SHEET 1 OF 4
MAY 2024
KASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
COUNTY OF PLACER, CALIFORNIA
CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
ITS: MANAGER
BY: FDC NOR-CAL CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
ROSEVILLE 10, LLC, A DELAWARE
SHEET 1 OF 4
1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8
26 27
28 N
0' 100'
SCALE 1"=100'
25'50' 200'
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
N89°34'35"E 1,143.60'
SHOWN ON (R1) (R2)
PIPE CAN'T READ AS
FOUND 1 1/4" IRON
(WEST 1143.15') (R1)
(N89°35'25"E 1143.15') (R2)
50.00'(R1)(R2)
N89°35'25"E
321.12' (M)
N00°16'25"E (R2)
N89°31'12"E 407.46'(M)
(N89°28'28"E 407.50')(R3)
(89°28'28"25.00')(R3)
N89°31'12"E 25.12'(M)
N89°42'48"E (M)
(N89°12'25"E)(R5)
165.01' (M) (R5) 160.70' (M) (R5)
N
0 0
°16'2
5 "E
(M
)
2 2
0.2 6'(M
)
(N
0 0
°
0 8'4
2 "W
)
(R
5 )
(2
2 0.01)
(R
5 )
RECORD DATA
S00°30'45"E 20.00' (R5)
S00°07'04"E 20.11' (M)
S00°30'45"E 5.00' (R5)
S00°07'04"E 4.89' (M)
NO TAG (R5)
FOUND 3/4 REBAR
NO TAG (R5)
FOUND 3/4 REBAR
N00°15'21"E 1342.75' (R6)
N00°08'42"W 1,343.28' (R5)
N00°16'25"E 1,342.53' (M)
165.04'
N89°01'20"E
N
0 0
°16'2
5 "E
6 6
0.0 0'
N
0 0
°16'2
5 "E
6 6
0.0 0'
252.64' (M)
N00°16'25"E
102.10'
N00°16'25"E
S89°47'20"E (R9)
N89°38'21"E (M)27.00'(M)(R9)
SECTION LINE
N89°01'20"E 740.46'(M)
LINE
SECTION
CENTERLINE
CONTRUCTION
2.04' (M)
N00°16'25"E
1.72' (M)
N00°16'25"E
N
0 0
°16'2
5 "E
(R
2 )
(R
7 )
2,6
7 8.3
9'(M
)
2 2
6 7
8.5 9'(R
6 )
2 6
7 8.9
0'(R
7 )
(O
A
)
(R10)
(R9)
(R8)
(R7)
(R6)
(R5)
(R4)
(R3)
(R2)
(R1)
BOOK C R.M. PAGE 58
BOOK M R.M. PAGE 28
BOOK BB R.M. PAGE 11
BOOK 8 P.M. PAGE 24
BOOK AA R.M. PAGE 16
BOOK 22 P.M. PAGE 141
BOOK 36 P.M. PAGE 18
BOOK Q R.M. PAGE 88
BOOK 15 P.M. PAGE 6
BOOK 1 R.O.S. PAGE 29
N
0 0
°16'2
5 "E
(M
)
(R
2 )
(R
7 ) 1,3
3 5.8
6'(M
)
(O
A
)1,3
3 7.5
0'(R10
)13
3 5.3
6'(R
5 )
SHOWN ON (R8) (R9)
IN MONUMENT WELL AS
FOUND 2 1/2" BRASS DISK
SHOWN ON (R3)
IN MONUMENT WELL AS
FOUND 1 1/2" COPPERWELD
SHOWN ON (R3)
IN MONUMENT WELL AS
FOUND 1 1/2" COPPERWELD
"LS 5876" AS SHOWN ON (R4)
IN MONUMENT WELL STAMPED
FOUND 1 1/2" COPPERWELD
(R6) (R7)
AS SHOWN ON (R2) (R5)
W 1/4 CORNER SECTION 34
STAMPED "LS 3917"
IN MONUMENT BOX
FOUND 2" BRASS DISK
PO
RTER
D
R
VI
E
RAND WAY
MAIN STREET
LAWTON AVE
B
A
S
IS
O
F
B
EAR
IN
G
S
(R8)
SECTION 3 AND 2 AS SHOWN ON
BEING THE SECTION CORNER OF
ALONG SECTION 34 LINE, ALSO
FOUND 1 1/2" BRASS DISK
FINAL MAP OF
T11N R6E, M.D.B. & M
LYING WITHIN PORTION OF SECTION 34,
PLACER COUNTY RECORDS
FILED IN BOOK C OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 58,
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 6 OF SUBDIVISION MAP
SHOWN ON (R9)
IN MONUMENT WELL AS
FOUND 2 1/2" BRASS DISK
AS SHOWN ON (R5) (R6) (R7)
SW CORNER SECTION 34
FOUND 1 1/4" COPPERWELD
NORTH 102.53' (R9)
S00°34'19"E 102.39' (M)
SHOWN ON (R9)
IN MONUMENT WELL AS
FOUND 2 1/2" BRASS DISK
CENTERLINE
CONSTRUCTION
N88°54'41"E 552.67'(M)
N89°29'00"E 552.77'(R9)
165.04'
N89°01'20"E
SECTION LINE
PER BOOK 15 P.M. PAGE 06
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
DOC # 2022-0043818-00
LENDCO LLC
PER BOOK M R.M. PAGE 28
KASEBERG COMMONS
PO
RTER
D
R
VI
E
SEE DETAIL "A"
NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL "A"
KASEBERG CIRCLE
PAGE 656
BOOK 2292 OR
LOT 97 PER
S89°47'20"E (R9)
27.00'(M)(R9)
N89°38'21"E (M)
1.41'
165.05'(M)
N88°54'41"E
386.31' (M)
N88°54'41"E 552.67' (M)(OA)
354.19'(M)354.24'(R8)
N88°52'54"E (M)N89°26'02'E (R8)
NOTES:
WAS DETERMINED FROM THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON.
OF PARCEL MAPS PAGE 06, BEING NORTH 00°16''25" EAST AND OF SECTION 34, AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 15
THE MERIDIAN FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE WEST SECTION LINE
N89°01'20"E 740.46'(M)
N89°29'00"E 552.77' (R9)
BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
STREET SUBDIVISION
INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN
SUBDIVISION NUMBER PL21-0372
DIVISION.
OFFICE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE BUILDING INSPECTION
THIS REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT THE
INC PROJECT NUMBER 05-23033G IN JUNE 2023. A COPY OF
SUBDIVISION WAS PREPARED BY ALLERION CONSULTING GROUP,
(5) A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT FOR THIS
DISK STAMPED R.C.E. 26388.
PROJECTION FROM THE PROPERTY LINE BY 1-5/32" BRASS
(4) ALL FRONT LOT CORNERS SHALL BE SET ON A 1.00 FOOT
2.00' OFFSET TO THE REAR LOT CORNER.
CAP STAMPED "R.C.E 26388" WILL BE SET ON THE LOT LINE
RETAINING WALL OR SOUNDWALL A 5/8 REBAR, WITH ALUMINUM
"R.C.E. 26388", WHERE MONUMENTS FALL ADJACENT TO A
MARKED WITH A 5/8" REBAR WITH 1" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED
(3) ALL REAR LOT CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS SHALL BE
DIMENSIONS MAY NOT EQUAL THE OVERALL DIMENSION.
(2) DUE TO ROUNDING, THE SUM OF THE INDIVIDUAL
GROSS, CONSISTING OF 10 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
(1) TOTAL AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS 2.50 ± ACRES
SHEET 2 OF 4
MAY 2024
KASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
PLACER, CALIFORNIA
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF
SHEET 2 OF 4
LEGEND
DECIMALS THEREOF
NOTE: ALL DISTANCES ARE IN FEET AND
R/W
(OA)
(C)
(R)
(M)
P.D.E.
P.U.E.
RIGHT OF WAY
OVERALL DISTANCE
CALCULATED
RECORD DATA
MEASURED
PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
BOUNDARY LINE OF SUBDIVISION
SECTION CORNER
DIMENSION POINT
FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED
STAMPED "RCE 26388"
SET 5/8" REBAR WITH CAP
STAMPED "RCE 26388"
SET 1-5/32" BRASS DISK
1 2 3 4 5 6
26 27 28
N
0' 40'
SCALE 1"=40'
20' 10' 80' 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 1
9 0
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
N89°55'29"E
165.04'
N89°01'20"E
63.60' 60.00' 60.00' 67.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 64.00' 75.39'
60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 67.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 65.00'
77.99'
SQ.FT.
10,197.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
11,055.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
9,900.00
SQ.FT.
10,638.51
SQ.FT.
12,642.24
PER BOOK 15 P.M.PAGE 06
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
DOC # 2022-0043818-00
LENDCO LLC
BOOK 2292 OR PAGE 656
LOT 97PER
PER BOOK M R.M.PAGE 28
KASEBERG COMMONS
M AIN STREET
PORTER DRIVE
PORTER DRIVE
KASEBERG CIRCLE
10'P.U.E.
10'P.U.E.
10'P.U.E.
15'P.D.E.
15'P.D.E.
15'P.D.E.
N89°01'20"E 165.04'
SECTION LINE
CENTERLINE
CONSTRUCTION
(R2)SHOW N ON30'R/W AS
ON (R2)1956 O.R.595 AS SHOW NCITY OF ROSEVILLE PERUTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED50'ROAD R/W & PUBLIC ON (R2)1956 O.R.595 AS SHOW NCITY OF ROSEVILLE PERUTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED50'ROAD R/W & PUBLIC AS SHOW N ON (R2)PER 1110 O.R.284CITY OF ROSEVILLEEASEMENT GRANTED TO10'SEW ER & DRAINAGE AS SHOW N ON (R2)PER 1110 O.R.284CITY OF ROSEVILLEEASEMENT GRANTED TO10'SEW ER & DRAINAGE SHOW N ON (R9)IN MONUMENT W ELL ASFOUND 2 1/2" BRASS DISK AS SHOW N ON (R5)(R6)(R7)SW CORNER SECTION 34FOUND 11/4" COPPERW ELD SHOW N ON (R9)IN MONUMENT W ELL ASFOUND 2 1/2" BRASS DISK N89°01'20"E 165.04'
CORNER
FROM PROPERTY
1.00'OFFSET
FRONT
BACK2
NOT TO SCALE
TYPICAL LOT MONUMENTATION
30.01'
30.01'
)AO('00.
066
E"52'61
°00N
)AO('00.
066
E"52'61
°00N
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
165.00'
S89°43'41"E
RECORD DATA
(R10)(R9)(R8)(R7)(R6)(R5)(R4)(R3)(R2)(R1)
BOOK C R.M.PAGE 58BOOK M R.M.PAGE 28BOOK BB R.M.PAGE 11BOOK 8 P.M.PAGE 24BOOK AA R.M.PAGE 16BOOK 22 P.M.PAGE 141BOOK 36 P.M.PAGE 18BOOK Q R.M.PAGE 88BOOK 15 P.M.PAGE 6BOOK 1R.O.S.PAGE 29
12.5' P.U.E.
CORNER
FROM PROPERTY
1.00'OFFSET
OF W ALK
TOP BACK
SHEET 3 OF 4
BOOK OF MAPS, PAGE
FINALMAPOF
T11N R6E,M.D.B.& M
LYING W ITHIN PORTION OFSECTION 34,
STREETSUBDIVISION
INFILLPCL131028MAIN
PLACERCOUNTYRECORDS
FILED IN BOOKC OFPARCELMAPS,PAGE58,
BEING APORTION OFLOT6OFSUBDIVISION MAP
LINE PER (R10)
FROM SECTION
30' EXISTING R/W
SUBDIVISION NUMBERPL21-0372
THIS MAP
DEDICATED PER
RIGHT OF W AY
SHEET3OF4
MAY2024
KASLCONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC.
COUNTYOFPLACER,CALIFORNIA
CITYOFROSEVILLE,
LEGEND
DECIMALS THEREOFNOTE:ALL DISTANCES ARE IN FEET AND
R/W
(OA)
(R)
(M)
P.D.E
P.U.E.
RIGHT OF W AYOVERALL DISTANCERECORD DATAMEASUREDPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTBOUNDARY LINE OF SUBDIVISIONSECTION CORNERDIMENSION POINTFOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBEDCAP STAMPED "RCE 26388"SET 5/8" REBAR W ITH ALUMINUMSTAMPED "RCE 26388"SET 1-1/32" BRASS DISK 1 2 3 4 5 6
27 28
N
0' 40'
SCALE 1"=40'
20' 10' 80' 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 10
9 PER BOOK 15 P.M. PAGE 06
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
DOC # 2022-0043818-00
LENDCO LLC
BOOK 2292 OR PAGE 656
LOT 97 PER
PER BOOK M R.M. PAGE 28
KASEBERG COMMONS
MAIN STREET
EVIR
D
RETR
OP
EVIR
D
RETR
OP
KASEBERG CIRCLE
SHEET 4 OF 4
B
O
O
K
O
F
M
AP
S
,
P
A
G
E
FINAL MAP OF
T11N R6E, M.D.B. & M
LYING WITHIN PORTION OF SECTION 34,
STREET SUBDIVISION
INFILL PCL 13 1028 MAIN
PLACER COUNTY RECORDS
FILED IN BOOK C OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 58,
BEING A PORTION OF LOT 6 OF SUBDIVISION MAP
SUBDIVISION NUMBER PL21-0372
SHEET 4 OF 4
MAY 2024
KASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
COUNTY OF PLACER, CALIFORNIA
CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSE ONLY PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434.2
OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
LEGEND
OWNER.
THE BY THEREAFTER MAINTAINED AND PERMIT BUILDING THE
WITH ROSEVILLE OF CITY THE BY CONNECTION SEWER SANITARY
ON REQUIRED VALVE PREVENTER BACKFLOW SEWER DENOTES
FAILURE OF THE VALVE FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER.
*
TO DUE CONTENTS ITS OR DWELLING SUCH ANY TO OCCURRING
DAMAGE ANY FOR LIABLE BE NOT SHALL ROSEVILLE OF CITY
THE AND VALVE, THE OF PERFORMANCE OR MAINTENANCE THE FOR RESPONSIBLE BE NOT SHALL ROSEVILLE OF CITY THE THERETO.
OCCURRING FROM DAMAGE PREVENT AND VALVE THE MAINTAIN
TO DWELLING SAID OF OWNER THE OF RESPONSIBILITY THE
BE SHALL IT ROSEVILLE. OF CITY THE BY APPROVED AS VALVE
PREVENTER BACKFLOW SEWER A WITH FITTED BE SHALL INDICATED
LOTS THE OF ANY ON CONSTRUCTED DWELLING RESIDENTIAL EACH
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3449
File #: 0400-04-09-1
Title: Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A Project - Notice of Completion Contact: Jeremy Knuthson 916-223-3859 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.12.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A - Improvement Plan, CWJ #191145, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeremy Knuthson, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-264
Notice of Completion
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-264
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A - Improvement Plan PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A - Improvement Plan is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Sierra Vista - Federico recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 6, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Silver Spruce Drive - Segment 2A -Improvement Plan.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on rollcall:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3427
File #: 0400-04-18
Title: Campus Oaks CO-2 - Notice of Completion
Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.13.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Campus Oaks CO-2, CWJ# 190643, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.
Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-244
NOC
Exhibit A: Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-244
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CAMPUS OAKS CO-2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO
EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND
ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Campus Oaks CO-2 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book GG of Maps, Page 28 is hereby accepted.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2024, by the following vote on rollcall:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3448
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title:
Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 2 Subdivision – Final Map and Subdivision Agreement
Contact: Jeff Hendrix 916-774-5463 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.14.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public easements offered thereon, and accept subject to improvement, Lots A and B, and the rights of way offered thereon, and approve the abandonment of the easements as listed thereon; and
2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 78 residential lots, a landscape lot (Lot A) and 1 lot for park purposes (Lot B).
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 2 project was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (certified May 19, 2010, SCH No. 2008032115), and identified in the associated Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 2 project is found to be within the scope of the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR, and is therefore exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15182. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including residential subdivisions. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 2 project. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no additional CEQA review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Hendrix, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-263
SubdivisionAgreement
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-263
APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., for the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 – Phase 2 Subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
FEE ___________ BY:______________________________
DOCUMENT NO. ___________________ ________________________________________ RECORDER'S STATEMENT:
BY:________________________________
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:
COUNTY RECORDER OF PLACER COUNTY
DEPUTY
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2" AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF
THE PUBLIC, THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDICATION, AND HAS
ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT LOTS 'A' AND 'B' AND THE RIGHTS-OF-WAY OFFERED
HEREON FOR DEDICATION AND DOES HEREBY APPROVE THE ABANDONMENT OF THE EASEMENT LISTED WITHIN NOTE 7 ON SHEET 2.
ACCEPTED FOR RECORD AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF PLACER
COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY, AT _____ MINUTES AFTER _____ O'CLOCK__M. ON THE ____ DAY OF ________, 2024 AND RECORDED IN BOOK _____ OF MAPS, AT PAGE _____.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2" WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN JUNE, 2022. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE
CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2025, THAT THE MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO
ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
DATE ___________________
______________________________________
JOHN KARL JEFFRIES L.S. 7820
EXPIRES 12/31/2025
DATED_____________ ___________________________________
OWNER'S STATEMENT:
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTERESTS IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2" SHOWN UPON THIS MAP AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO
THE PREPARATION AND RECORDING OF THIS MAP AND OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WATER, GAS, DRAIN AND SEWER PIPES, AND FOR POLES AND OVERHEAD AND
UNDERGROUND WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE
SERVICES, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON,
OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS, LOT 'A' AND THE STREET, WAY AND COURTS AND THOSE
STRIPS OF LAND LYING CONTIGUOUS TO THE STREET, WAY AND COURTS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT).
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (INCLUDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREETS
SHOWN HEREON AS DOG HOBBLE COURT, HEARTLEAF WAY, BEEPLANT STREET AND JACOBS LADDER COURT.
(B) LOT 'A' SHOWN HEREON AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES. (C) LOT 'B' SHOWN HEREON FOR PARK PURPOSES.
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2" AND FIND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP ON FILE
AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATED_____________
_______________________________________
MARC STOUT R.C.E. 69879
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
EXPIRATION DATE 09/30/2024
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2" IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
For Marc Stout, City Engineer, City of Roseville
DATED_____________
_______________________________________
TIMOTHY G. BLAIR
P.L.S. 8278 EXPIRATION DATE 12/31/2025
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:
JOB NO. 22-02-005
STA TE OF CA LIFORNIA
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 1 OF 8
TITLE:
PRINT NAME:
TITLE:
PRINT NAME:
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE
IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF PLACER
ON _____________, 2024, BEFORE ME, _________________________________ A NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME AND TITLE OF OFFICER)
PERSONALLY APPEARED ____________________________________________________________
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)
WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO
ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),
AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
MY COMMISSION # IS _________________.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ____________. ____________________________________
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN NOTARY PUBLIC
___________________________ COUNTY.
____________________________________
PRINT NAME
BY: BY:
CARMEN AVALOS, CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
1. ALL BEARINGS ALONG CURVED LINES ARE CHORD MEASUREMENTS.
2. THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 16.721 ACRES MORE OR LESS, CONTAINING 78 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 78, ONE (1) LANDSCAPE LOT LETTERED LOT 'A' AND ONE LOT FOR PARK PURPOSES LETTERED LOT 'B'.
3. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.
4. A PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY YOUNGDAHL CONSULTING GROUP, PROJECT NO. E133171.013 DATED JANUARY 22, 2021. A COPY OF THIS REPORT IS
AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (FILE NUMBER 308-810A).
5. ALL REAR PROPERTY CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS SHALL BE MONUMENTED WITH A 5/8" REBAR WITH METAL CAP STAMPED "LS7820". IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT WITH A RETAINING WALL OR FENCE, A 3.0' WITNESS CORNER SHALL BE SET ONLINE.
6. ALL FRONT PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE MONUMENTED WITH A 1" BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS7820", 1.0' FROM PROPERTY CORNER INTO THE SIDEWALK ON A PROJECTION OF PROPERTY LINE AT FRONT AND/OR SIDE LOT LINES PRODUCED.
7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434(g) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, THE FOLLOWING EASEMENT IS HEREBY ABANDONED:
(A) THE 30.0' WIDE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT (M.A.E.) AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) SHOWN ON, OVER AND ACROSS LOT 79 AS SHOWN ON THAT FINAL MAP ENTITLED "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1, FILED IN BOOK '___' OF MAPS, AT PAGE ___.
8. THE LOTS SHOWN HEREON ARE SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASES 1 AND 2" FILED AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2024-______________________, O.R.P.C..
NOTES:
FND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
(R) RADIAL LINE
P.U.E.
LEGEND:
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SET BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF
ROSEVILLE MONUMENT WELL STAMPED L.S. 7820
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 9570" PER FF BM 51
REFERENCES:
(1) RECORD PER EE BM 6
(2) RECORD PER FF BM 51
(3) RECORD PER ___ BM ___
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS IDENTICAL TO THE CENTERLINE OF VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD, BEING N 88°55'34" E AND ESTABLISHED BY MONUMENTS FOUND AS SHOWN HEREON PER EE BM 6.
SHEET 2 OF 8
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 2 OF 8
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
7 3.0
0' (3)
N 61°25'15" E
110.00' (3)
36.97'
(1)(3)
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
115.4
5' (1)(3)
N 13°0
0 5' 7" W
413.84'
(1)(3)
L
=
416.8
5' R
=1,0
0 0.00' ∆
=
23°53
0' 1"
N
24°57'27" W
438.24' (1)(3)
BASIS OF BEARINGS
N 88°55'34" E (2) 1,515.55' (1)(3)
443.86'(2)(3)
1,071.69'
206.54' (1)(3)
∆
N
14 °36'31" W
724 .27' L
=
7 3
1.5 0' R
=1,5
0 0.0
0' =
2 7°5
6'2
8" (1)(3) ∆
37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30
29 38
40 41 42 43 44 45 46
3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2
9 10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 52 51 50 49 48
47 75 74
73 72
76 77
78 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64
63 61
62 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
LOT B
39 LOT A
N
0°3
8'17" W
2 6
3.9 0' (1)(3)
N 28°34'45" W
352.76' (1)(3)
230.96' (1)(3)
121.79' (1)
S 14°25'44" E 733.39'
L=740.90' R=1,500.00'
∆=28°18'01" (1)(3)
S 46°04'26" E
21.21' (3)
N 88°55'34" E 697.79' (3)
N 44°08'38" E
99.37' (3)
N
0 0°3
8'17" W
121.5
5' (3)
S 65°21'55" W
110.00' (3)
S 23°46'51" E 38.90' (3)
L=38.90' R=1,305.00' ∆=1°42'29"
S 67°04'24" W
152.07' (3)
S 21°48'54" E
41.95' (3)
S 71°13'27" W
S 76°30'49" W 59.85' (3)
54.99' (3)
S 81°02'17" W
65.62' (3)
S 88°55'34" W 240.00' (3)
S
01°0
4'2
4" E
121.4
9' (3)
S 01°04'26" E 42.00' (3)
S 88°55'34" W
18.51' (3)
S 43°55'34" W 31.11' (3)
L=34.56' R=22.00' ∆=90°00'00"
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 19
3.71'
S 46°04'26" E 31.11' (3)
L=34.56' R=22.00' ∆=90°00'00"
N 88°55'34" E 10.40' (3)
S 1°04'26" E
42.00' (3)
S 88°55'34" W 8.40' (3)
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00' ∆=90°00'00"
S 12°01'39" E
30.23' (3)
N 88°55'34" E
60.72' (3)
S
09°00
0' 0" E
107.78' (3)
C65 C64
C66
N 88°55'34" E
42.00' (3)
C
6 2
S 47°57'52" E 30.53' (3)
L=33.75' R=22.00' ∆=87°53'08"
C63 N 88°55'34" E
72.56' (3)
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
110.0
0' (3)
N 88°55'34" E 440.00' (3) N 79°21'47" E 171.14' (3)
N 28°34'45" W
12.62'
N 28°34'45" W
31.47' (3)
N 61°25'15" E
42.00' (3) N 61°25'15" E
82.00' (3)
N
28°34'45" W
180.96' (1)(3)
N 27°51'44" W 39.04'
L=39.04' R=1,560.00'
∆=1°26'01" (1)(3)
N
20°09'55" W
120.00' (1)(2)
N 22°21'07" W 20.90'
L=20.90' R=1,550.00'
∆=0°46'21" (1)(3)
S 87°02'25" W 243.51' (1)(3)
S
23°59'49" E
284.72'
(1)(3)
L=285.02' R=1,782.00' ∆=9°09'51"
S 28°34'45" E
7.71' (1)(3)
S 15°27'21" W 43.10' (1)(3)
L=47.65' R=31.00' ∆=88°04'12"
S 74°12'30" W 245.42'
(1)(3)
L=248.14' R=483.00' ∆=29°26'07"
S 88°55'34" W 600.20' (1)(3)
S 19°45'43" W
11.14' (1)(3)
S 23°17'10" E
47.45' (1)(3)
S 08°07'52" W
66.81' (1)(3)
S 37°14'12" W
19.14' (3)
C36
C5
9 L7
N
12°38'11" W
588.3
1' L
=
5 9
2.6 3' R
=1,4 15.0
0' =
2 3°5
9'4
8" (3)
53 C62
C63
C64
C65
C66
11.78'
14.85'
33.58'
42.18'
14.29'
229.00'
1,021.00'
22.00'
1,021.00'
271.00'
2°56'52"
0°50'00"
87°27'42"
2°22'02"
3°01'14"
S 2°32'52" E
N 88°30'34" E
N 39°38'11" E
N 82°11'01" E
N 2°35'04" W
11.78'
14.85'
30.42'
42.18'
14.29'
L7 S 28°34'45" E 4.00'
LINE TABLE
LINE # DIRECTION LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C36 34.56' 22.00' 90°00'00" S 73°34'45" E 31.11'
C59 48.69' 31.00' 90°00'00" N 16°25'15" E 43.84'
SHEET 3 OF 8
V
JOB NO. 22-02-005
ISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
ALUMROOT DRIVE
DOG HOBBLE WAY
POGONIA STREET
HEARTLEAF
WAY
SILVER SPRUCE
DRIVE
BALSAMROOT
DRIVE
POGONIA
STREET
SHEET 5
SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
S 70°35'06" W (R)
S 68°02'04" W (R)
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 100'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 3 OF 8
HEARTLEAF WAY
BEEPLANT STREET
JACOBS LADDER
CT.
WESTBROOK
BOULEVA
RD
DOG HOBBLE COURT
SHEET 7
SHEET 6
___ BM ___
(R)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
N
0°3
8'17" W
2 6
3.9 0' (1)(3)
S 46°04'26" E
21.21'
N 88°55'34" E 697.79' (3)
N 44°08'38" E 99.37'
N
0 0°3
8'17" W 121.5
5'
7 3.0
0'
S 1°0
4'2
6" E
8 2.0
0' (3)
37 6,600 S.F.
36 6,600 S.F.
35 6,600 S.F.
34 6,600 S.F.
33 6,600 S.F.
31 6,600 S.F.
32 6,600 S.F.
30 7,672 S.F.
29 10,130 S.F.
38 7,596 S.F.
6 6,600 S.F.
7 6,600 S.F.
8 3 6,600 S.F.
6,600 S.F.
4 6,600 S.F.
5 6,600 S.F. 1
7,484 S.F.
2 6,600 S.F.
10 7,040 S.F.
11 9.338 S.F.
12 11,888 S.F.
13 6,851 S.F.
14 7,121 S.F.
15 6,786 S.F.
21.0 0' 21.0
0'
N
0 6°48
2' 2" W
5 8.98'
N 48°55'52" E
40.59'
N 84°39'34" E (R) 110.00'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 131.9
7'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
60 60.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 70 .00' .00'
65.00' 65.00' 65.00' 45.00'
81.02' 28.98'
48.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60 60.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 48 .00' .00'
55.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 102.79' 16.41' 82.96' 7 6.4
4' 4
5.11'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 115.9
7'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 111.3
9'
S 35°20'31" E (R) 130.04'
S 89°21'43" W 112.09'
S 89°21'43" W 119.40'
N 86°07'23" E (R) 111.21'
N 83°31'42" E (R) 110.00'
462.88'
462.88'
N 88°55'34" E
50.00'
N
0 0°3
8'17" W
5 0.0
0'
N 88°55'34" E 462.88' N 88°55'34" E
53.40' (3)
2 7
9.71' (3) 16
6.0 0' (3) 3
8.0 0' (3)
7.33'
N
2°3
3'3
2" W
6 5.0
9'
L
=
6 5.0
9' ∆
=
2°3
8'0
9"
N
5°10'2
7" W
6 4.0
8'
L
=
6 4.0
8' ∆
=
2°3
5'41"
N
L
=
6 4.0
8' ∆
=
S 88°55'34" W
8.40'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 19
3.71'
C17
C3
C7
C16
C4
C8 C9
C10
C11 C12
C15
C
5 C14
C
6 C13
N 5°48'15" W 30.40'
L=30.40' ∆=1°20'06"
N 5°14'19" W 4.49'
L=4.49' ∆=0°12'14"
S 2°53'56" W 4.78'
L=4.78' ∆=1°11'43"
S 6°11'26" W 21.53'
L=21.54' ∆=5°23'17"
N 4°54'36" E 37.57'
L=37.60' ∆=7°56'58"
N 2°06'02" W 28.71'
L=28.72' ∆=6°04'19"
C18
C19
C20
C21
C
2 2
3.29'
R
=1,2
6 3.0'
R
=1,3
0 5.0'
R=22.00'
7.33'
N 44°08'38" E 30.99'
L=34.39' ∆=89°33'51"
C23
C24
N 0°56'22" W 14.89'
L=14.89' ∆=0°36'11"
5.29'
70.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00'
8 8.0
0'
S 1°0
4'2
6" E
4 8
3.71' (3)
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 12°
3 8 1' 1" W
5 8
8.31' L
=
5 9
2.6 3'
R
=1,415.0
0' ∆
=
2 3°5
9'4
8"
(1)(3)
N 14°3
6'31" W
7 2
4.2 7'
L
=
7 31.5
0' R
=1,5
0 0.0
0' ∆
=
2 7°5
6'2
8"
(1)(3)
BASIS OF BEARINGS
N 88°55'34" E 1,515.55' (1)(3)
443.86' (2)(3)
9 6,713 S.F.
N 88°55'34" E
10.40'
S 82°04'20" W
31.26'
L=31.29'
∆=7°49'42"
S 46°04'26" E 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E
890.24' (4)
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
C15
C16
C17
61.18'
54.29'
34.13'
17.21'
131.87'
17.21'
26.31'
66.32'
56.04'
45.04'
54.29'
45.88'
250.00'
271.00'
229.00'
32.00'
52.00'
32.00'
229.00'
271.00'
229.00'
271.00'
271.00'
229.00'
14°01'17"
11°28'42"
8°32'20"
30°48'22"
145°17'50"
30°48'22"
6°35'00"
14°01'17"
14°01'17"
9°31'22"
11°28'42"
11°28'42"
N 1°52'26" E
N 83°11'13" E
S 81°43'02" W
N 78°36'37" W
N 44°08'38" E
S 13°06'06" E
S 5°35'35" W
N 1°52'26" E
N 1°52'26" E
S 4°07'24" W
S 83°11'13" W
N 83°11'13" E
61.03'
54.20'
34.10'
17.00'
99.27'
17.00'
26.30'
66.15'
55.90'
44.99'
54.20'
45.80'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C3
C4
C5
LENGTH
50.08'
50.08'
41.55'
RADIUS
250.00'
250.00'
250.00'
DELTA
11°28'42"
11°28'42"
9°31'22"
CHORD
DIRECTION
N 83°11'13" E
S 83°11'13" W
S 4°07'24" W
CHORD
LENGTH
50.00'
50.00'
41.50'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C18
C19
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24
2.84'
13.24'
43.15'
35.67'
39.81'
44.99'
9.30'
229.00'
52.00'
52.00'
52.00'
52.00'
271.00'
271.00'
0°42'38"
14°35'13"
47°32'51"
39°18'05"
43°51'41"
9°30'43"
1°57'59"
S 77°48'10" W
S 70°30'03" E
N 78°25'55" E
N 35°00'27" E
N 6°34'26" W
S 84°10'12" W
S 78°25'51" W
2.84'
13.20'
41.93'
34.97'
38.84'
44.94'
9.30'
SHEET 4 OF 8
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
S 74°38'36" E (R)
20'x20' BUS SHELTER
EASEMENT PER (1)
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
W
E
S
T
B
R
O
O
K
B
O
U
L
E
VA
R
D
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
HEARTLEAF WAY
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 4 OF 8
12.5' P.U.E.
21' 21'
21' 21'
23' 23'
21' 21'
S 12°12'21" W (R)
N 11°5
0'31" W (R)
N 86°30'12" W (R)
S 89°03'53" E (R)
N 88°45'32" E (R)
N 14 °01'5
4 " W
3 9
7.0 8'
L=
3 9
8.6 8' R
=1,2
8 4 .0
0' =17°4
7'2
4 " ∆
N 89°55'34" E 490.00'
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
N 10°3
5'10" W (R)
N 23°20'15" W 64.08'
L=64.08' ∆=2°35'41"
S 88°55'34" W
18.51' (3)
15.85'
N
18°08
5' 3" W
64.08'
L
=
64.08' ∆
=
2°35'41"
N 20°44'34" W 64.08'
L=64.08' ∆=2°35'41"
N 15°33
1' 2" W
64.08'
L
=
64.08' ∆
=
2°35'41"
N 12°5
7 3' 0" W
64.08'
L
=
6 4.0
8' ∆
=
2°3
5'41"
N 14°3
6 3' 1" W
7 2
4.2 7' L
=
731.50' R
=
1,500.00' ∆
=
27°56
2' 8"
(1)
N 12°3
8 1' 1" W
5 8
8.31' L
=
5 9
2.6 3' R
=1,415.00' ∆
=
23°59'48"
N 65°21'55" E (R) 110.00'
S 23°46'51" E 38.90'
L=38.90' R=1,305.00'
∆=1°42'29"
S 67°04'24" W (R) 152.07'
S
21°48'54" E
41.95'
S 71°13'27" W
59.85'
S 76°30'49" W
54.99'
S 81°02'17" W
S 88°55'34" W 240.00'
65.62'
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
40 7,662 S.F.
41 7,662 S.F.
42 7,662 S.F.
43 8,301 S.F.
44 8,305 S.F.
45 8,329 S.F.
46 9,943 S.F.
16 6,775 S.F.
17 6,775 S.F.
18 6,775 S.F.
19 6,775 S.F.
20 6,775 S.F.
21 6,775 S.F.
22 6,775 S.F.
23 6,806 S.F.
24 6,804 S.F.
25 6,813 S.F.
26 6,813 S.F.
27 6,813 S.F.
28 6,813 S.F.
53 7,290 S.F.
52 7,290 S.F.
51 7,290 S.F.
50 7,290 S.F.
49 8,190 S.F.
48 9,341 S.F.
47 8,570 S.F.
39 8,836 S.F.
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 121.4
9'
121.4
9' 21.0
0' 21.0
0'
48.00' 65 46.36' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' .00'
60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 65.00'
60 60.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' .00'
21.00' 21.00' 110.07'
N 70°00'15" E (R) 109.71'
N 72°56'07" E (R) 110.00'
N 75°51'59" E (R) 110.00'
N 78°47'51" E (R) 110.00'
N 81°43'43" E (R) 110.00'
S
1 6°23
3' 8" E
1 16
9. 6'
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 13
0.5 0'
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 121.4
9'
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 121.4
9'
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 121.4
9'
S
01°0
4'2
4" E 121.4
9'
N
18°14
4' 6" W
58 9. 9'
N
1 5°35
5' 7" W
58 9. 8'
N 12°40
0' 5" W
58 9. 8'
N
09°44 1' 3" W
58 9. 8'
N
0 6°4
8 2' 2" W
5 8.98'
N 48°55'52" E
40.59'
N 84°39'34" E (R) 110.00'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
7.71'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
8.3 5'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
3.3 5'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
7.71'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
7.71'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
7.71'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 12
7.71'
60 60.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 70 .00' .00'
65.00' 65.00' 65.00' 45.00'
81.02' 28.98'
N 83°31'42" E (R) 110.00'
N 80°56'01" E (R) 110.00'
N 78°20'20" E (R) 110.00'
N 75°44'39" E (R) 110.00'
N 73°08'58" E (R) 110.00'
N 70°33'17" E (R) 110.00'
N 67°57'36" E (R) 110.00'
320.85'
320.85'
S 88°55'34" W 320.85' S 88°55'34" W (3)
61.51'
2 7
9.71' (3)
N 14°01 5' 4" W
3 9
7.0 8' L
=
398.68' R
=1,284.00' ∆
=
17°47
2' 4"
N 14°01 5' 4" W
3 9
0.5 8' L
=
392 1. 6' R
=1,263.00' ∆
=
17°47
2' 4"
N 14°01 5' 4" W
4 0
3.5 7' L
=
40 5.20' R
=1,305.00' ∆
=
17°47'24"
5'41"
N
7°4
6 0' 8" W
6 4.0
8'
L
=
6 4.0
8' ∆
=
2°3
5'41"
N 10°21'4
9" W
6 4.0
8'
L
=
6 4.0
8' ∆
=
2°3
5'41"
L5
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 19
3.71'
R
=1,2
6 3.0'
R
=1,3
0 5.0'
70.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00'
10 5.71'
N 79°26'45" E 82.35' L=82.73' R=250.00'
∆=18°57'37"
C25
C26
C
27 C28
C29
C30 C31
C32
C33
C34
C35
N 6°48'22" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 9°44'13" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 12°40'05" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 15°35'57" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 18°31'49" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 21°27'40" W 64.60'
L=64.61' ∆=2°55'52"
N 20°44'34" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 18°08'53" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 15°33'12" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 12°57'30" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 10°21'49" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
N 7°46'08" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
31 6. 1' 27
3. 6'
9 2.6
3'
58.98'
17.03'
S 1°0
4'2
6" E
N 23°20'15" W 59.09'
L=59.10' ∆=2°35'41"
C31
C32
C33
C34
C35
20.85'
19.34'
66.74'
66.07'
21.85'
271.00'
39.00'
39.00'
39.00'
39.00'
4°24'30"
28°24'58"
98°02'43"
97°03'36"
32°05'40"
N 82°46'39" E
S 80°24'53" E
N 36°21'16" E
N 61°11'53" W
S 54°13'29" W
20.85'
19.14'
58.89'
58.45'
21.56'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L5
DIRECTION
S 77°19'55" W
LENGTH
19.58'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C25
C26
C27
C28
C29
C30
20.16'
35.90'
173.99'
26.09'
39.51'
18.66'
229.00'
45.00'
39.00'
45.00'
271.00'
271.00'
5°02'41"
45°42'13"
255°36'57"
33°13'12"
8°21'10"
3°56'40"
N 86°24'13" E
N 61°01'46" E
N 14°00'53" W
N 82°49'00" W
N 84°44'59" E
N 86°57'14" E
20.16'
34.95'
61.63'
25.73'
39.47'
18.65'
SHEET 5 OF 8
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
S
4°3
7'2
2" E
R( )
DOG HOBBLE COURT
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 5 OF 8
DOG HOBBLE WAY
N 89°55'34" E 490.00'
HEA
RT
LEA
F
WAY
S
5°01'0
6" E
R( )
N
1 9°43
4' 1" W
R(
)
21' 21'
21' 21'
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
S 1°0
4'2
6" E
4 8
3 7. 1' (3)
21' 21'
W
ESTBROOK
BOULEVARD
(R)
L7
S 28°34'45" E
45.00' (3)
17.31'
14.10'
N 28°34'45" W
352.76' (1)(3)
230.96' (1)(3)
121.79' (1)
S
14°25'44" E
733.39'
L=740.90' R=1,500.00'
∆=28°18'01"
(1)(3)
N 88°55'34" E 440.00' (3)
N 79°21'47" E 171.14' (3)
N 61°25'15" E 110.00' (3)
N 61°25'15" E
42.00' (R)
N 61°25'15" E 82.00'
C59
N 28°34'45" W
180.96'
N 27°51'44" W
39.04' L=39.04'
R=1,560.00'
∆=1°26'01" (3)
N
20°09'55" W
120.00' (3)
C60
S 87°02'25" W 243.51'
S
23°59'49" E
284.72' L=285.02' R=1,782.00' ∆=9°09'51"
(1)(3)
S 28°34'45" E
7.71' (1)(3)
S 15°27'21" W 43.10' (1)(3)
L=47.65' R=31.00' ∆=88°04'12"
S 74°12'30" W 245.42' L=248.14' R=483.00' ∆=29°26'07"
(1)(3)
LOT 'A'
10,879 S.F.
69 6,600 S.F.
68 6,600 S.F.
67 6,600 S.F.
66 6,967 S.F.
65 7,583 S.F.
64 7,972 S.F.
63 11,742 S.F.
61 8,310 S.F.
62 6,660 S.F.
54 7,484 S.F.
55 6,600 S.F.
56 6,607 S.F.
57 6,953 S.F.
58 8,927 S.F.
59 12,495 S.F.
60 10,302 S.F.
LOT B
4,156 S.F.
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
5°54
0' 6" E
R( ) 112
2. 6'
S 12°17 1' 9" E
R( ) 122
3. 6'
S
18°31
3' 7" E
R(
)
128
2. 8'
N 28°34'45" W
149.43'
N 61°25'15" E
7 110.00'
6.81' 60.00'
60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 67.73' 72.27'
71.02' 100.12'
60 60.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' .00'
402.10'
N 88°55'34" E 445.10'
N 61°25'15" E 112.22'
37.37'
69.22'
N 28°34'45" W
145.31'
83.00'
145.31'
37.31' 60.00' 48.00'
60.00' 54.47'
S 61°25'15" W 110.00'
S 61°25'15" W 110.00'
S 61°25'15" W 110.95'
S 61°25'15" W 123.47'
S 59°32'19" W (R) 119.28
S
'
4°0
3'2
9" W (R) 10
9.91'
N 75°10'24" E 238.68' L=240.99' R=502.00' ∆=27°30'18"
N 75°10'24" E 249.62' L=252.03' R=525.00' ∆=27°30'18"
128.00'
N 28°34'45" W
192.96'
S
25°03'17" E
194.87' L=194.99' R=1,585.00' ∆=7°02'55"
36.97' 94.99' 111.55'
S
37°11'22" E
76.76' L=77.06' R=250.00'
∆=17°39'41"
N 37°17'59" W
75.81'
L=76.10' R=250.00'
∆=17°26'28"
21.00' 21.00'
C50
C49
C48
N 67°28'18" E 73.27'
L=73.33' ∆=8°00'10"
N 62°26'44" E 18.78'
L=18.78' ∆=2°02'59" C36
C37
C38
C3
9 C40
C41
C42
C43
C44
C45
C
4 6
C47
C51
C52
C53
C54
C
55 C56
C57
C58
N 61°25'15" E 216.00' (3)
73.00'
9.00'
445.21'
N 16°25'15" E
21.21'
55.00' 60.00' 60.00' 17.96'
S 27°49'09" E 42.04'
L=42.04' ∆=1°31'11"
S
25°43'56" E
73.43'
L=73.43' ∆=2°39'16"
S
22°58'04" E
79.51'
L=79.52' ∆=2°52'28"
S
22°11'04" E
172.21'
L=172.28' ∆=5°32'21"
C61
31.47' (3)
N 28°34'45" W
12.62' (3)
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C36
C37
C38
C39
C40
C41
C42
C43
C44
C45
C46
C47
C48
34.56'
82.49'
21.75'
26.91'
178.91'
20.68'
36.96'
38.99'
37.51'
34.56'
33.30'
14.35'
57.16'
22.00'
271.00'
229.00'
32.00'
39.00'
32.00'
271.00'
229.00'
22.00'
22.00'
31.00'
31.00'
525.00'
90°00'00"
17°26'28"
5°26'27"
48°11'16"
262°50'29"
37°01'36"
7°48'51"
9°45'16"
97°41'12"
90°00'00"
61°33'03"
26°31'09"
6°14'18"
S 73°34'45" E
N 37°17'59" W
S 43°17'59" E
S 16°29'08" E
S 56°11'16" W
N 56°43'10" W
S 42°06'47" E
N 41°08'35" W
N 12°34'39" E
N 73°34'45" W
N 2°11'46" E
N 46°13'52" E
N 74°35'32" E
31.11'
82.18'
21.74'
26.13'
58.49'
20.32'
36.93'
38.94'
33.13'
31.11'
31.72'
14.22'
57.13'
C49
C50
C51
C52
C53
C54
C55
C56
C57
C58
C59
C60
C61
58.52'
44.24'
22.71'
59.78'
1.53'
20.21'
25.91'
37.76'
81.01'
34.22'
48.69'
20.90'
112.74'
525.00'
525.00'
271.00'
271.00'
229.00'
229.00'
39.00'
39.00'
39.00'
39.00'
31.00'
1,550.00'
1,782.00'
6°23'13"
4°49'40"
4°48'08"
12°38'20"
0°22'59"
5°03'28"
38°04'11"
55°28'50"
119°01'08"
50°16'20"
90°00'00"
0°46'21"
3°37'30"
N 80°54'17" E
N 86°30'44" E
N 30°58'49" W
N 39°42'03" W
S 45°49'43" E
S 43°06'30" E
N 11°25'35" W
N 58°12'06" W
S 34°32'55" W
S 50°05'49" E
N 16°25'15" E
N 22°21'07" W
S 26°46'00" E
58.49'
44.22'
22.71'
59.66'
1.53'
20.21'
25.44'
36.31'
67.21'
33.13'
43.84'
20.90'
112.73'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
L6
L6
L7
S 65°02'21" W
S 28°34'45" E
0.53'
4.00'
LINE TABLE
LINE # DIRECTION LENGTH
SHEET 6 OF 8
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
WESTBROOK
BOULEVARD
BEEPLANT STREET
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 6 OF 8
BALSAMROOT DRIVE
HEARTLEAF
WAY
19' 23'
23'
S 88°55'34" W 600.20' (1)(3)
60 LOT 'B'
S 57°01'42" E (R)
N 56°37'07" E (R)
S 44°21'46" W (R) S 62°56'26" W (R)
S 65°35'42" W (R)
S 68°28'11" W (R)
S 68°02'04" W (R)
S 70°35'06" W (R)
S
6 5°0
2'4
5" W (R)
JA COBS LADDER COURT
21'
21'
S 26°31'46" E (R)
12.5' P.U.E
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
(R)
12.5' P.U.E
S 12°01'39" E
30.23' (3)
N 88°55'34" E
60.72' (3)
S
9°00
0' 0" E
R( ) 107
7. 8' (3)
C65
C64
C
6 6
C
6 2
S 47°57'52" E 30.53'
L=33.75' ∆=87°53'08"
C63 N 88°55'34" E 72.56' (3)
N 1°0
4'2
6" W 110
0. 0' (3)
S 88°55'34" W 600.20' (1)(3)
S 19°45'43" W
11.14' (1)(3)
S
23°17'10" E
47.45' (1)(3)
S
08°07'52" W
66.81' (1)(3)
75 7,046 S.F.
74 8,651 S.F.
73 6,600 S.F.
72 8,737 S.F.
76 7,542 S.F.
77 6,683 S.F.
78 6,983 S.F.
71 6,600 S.F.
70 6,600 S.F.
N 88°55'34" E 110.00'
N 88°55'34" E 110.00'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
60.00' 60.00' 60.00'
60 60.00' 60 .00' .00' 88.00'
5 8.3
7' 6
0.0 0' 4
7.0 9'
16 5.4
7'
13 9.7
2'
402.10'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E
210.4
7'
N 88°55'34" E 445.10'
N 88°55'34" E 136.94'
N 88°55'34" E 129.15'
N 88°55'34" E 109.60'
76.21'
6 4.4
7'
7 9.6
3' 6
0.0 0' 8
0.3 7'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E 110.0
0'
R
=22.00'
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' ∆=90°00'00"
445.21' 154.99'
5 5.0
0' 2
0.2 5
5 '
5.72'
N 37°14'12" E
77.00' (1)(3)
10.43'
21.00' 21.00'
R=22.00'
C
6 7
N
0 4°16 1' 2" W
41.2 2'
C68
C
69 C70
C71
N 88°55'34" E
19.14'
C62
C63
C64
C65
C66
C67
C68
C69
C70
C71
11.78'
14.85'
33.58'
42.18'
14.29'
13.95'
16.64'
88.20'
20.03'
68.17'
229.00'
1,021.00'
22.00'
1,021.00'
271.00'
250.00'
32.00'
52.00'
52.00'
52.00'
2°56'52"
0°50'00"
87°27'42"
2°22'02"
3°01'14"
3°11'46"
29°48'10"
97°10'58"
22°03'59"
75°06'59"
S 2°32'52" E
N 88°30'34" E
N 39°38'11" E
N 82°11'01" E
N 2°35'04" W
S 2°40'19" E
N 15°58'31" W
S 17°42'53" W
S 19°50'37" E
S 28°44'52" W
11.78'
14.85'
30.42'
42.18'
14.29'
13.94'
16.46'
78.00'
19.90'
63.40'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
0.66'
SHEET 7 OF 8
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES, LEGEND AND REFERENCES.
B
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
12.5' P.U.E.
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 7 OF 8
BEEPLANT STREET
ALUMROOT DRIVE
2 3' 19'
21'
21'
N 88°55'34" E 440.00' (3)
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
S 81°11'23" W (R)
N 23°41'38" W (R)
37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30
29 38
40 41 42 43 44 45 46
3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2
9 10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 52 51 50 49 48
47 75 74
73 72
76 77
78 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64
63 61
62 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
LOT B
39 LOT A
53 SHEET 8 OF 8
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
Informational Sheet Only
THIS SHEET CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE.
EACH RESIDENTIAL DWELLING CONSTRUCTED ON ANY OF THE LOTS INDICATED HEREON
SHALL BE FITTED WITH A SEWER BACKFLOW VALVE AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OF SAID DWELLING TO MAINTAIN THE VALVE AND PREVENT DAMAGE FROM OCCURRING THERETO. THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE
VALVE, AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE OCCURRING
TO ANY SUCH DWELLING, OR ITS CONTENTS, DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE VALVE FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER.
DENOTES SEWER BACKFLOW PREVENTER VALVE
REQUIRED ON THE SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION BY
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT AND
MAINTAINED THEREAFTER BY THE HOMEOWNER.
DOG HOBBLE WAY
ALUMROOT DRIVE
POGONIA STREET
HEARTLEAF
WAY
SILVER
SPRUCE
DRIVE
WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
BALSAMROOT
DRIVE
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOT 79 AND LOT 80 AS SHOWN ON "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" - '____' BM ____ LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 8 OF 8
DOG HOBBLE COURT
HEARTLEAF WAY
BEEPLANT STREET
POGONIA STREET
JACOBS LADDER
CT.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3447
File #: 0400-04-012-1 & 0400-07
Title:
Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement
Contact: Edward Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.15.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements and maintenance access easement offered thereon and accept, subject to improvement, Lots A, B, C, and D, the right of way, and all easements offered thereon; and approve the abandonment of the right of way and easements as listed thereon; and
2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
The Development Services Department, Engineering Division, has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 78 residential lots, 3 public landscape lots, 1 lot for storm drain purposes, and 2 future development lots.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Development of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 project was previously evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (certified May 19, 2010, SCH No. 2008032115), and identified in the associated Sierra Vista Specific Plan. Construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 project is found to be within the scope of the project covered by the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR, and is therefore exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15182. As discussed in the Specific Plan EIR, the EIR provides environmental analyses of community infrastructure and facilities, including residential subdivisions. Because the project is consistent with the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR and Specific Plan, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented during the design and construction of the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 Phase 1 project. Because the proposed project meets the requirements identified in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no additional CEQA review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Edward Winston, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-262
SubdivisionAgreement
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-262
APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., for the Sierra Vista Village FD-08 – Phase 1 Subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
FEE ___________ BY:______________________________
DOCUMENT NO. ___________________ ________________________________________ RECORDER'S STATEMENT:
BY:________________________________
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT:
COUNTY RECORDER OF PLACER COUNTY
DEPUTY
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF
THE PUBLIC, THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDICATION, AND HAS ACCEPTED, SUBJECT TO IMPROVEMENT,
LOTS 'A', 'B', 'C' & 'D', THE RIGHTS OF WAY, AND ALL EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR
DEDICATION, AND DOES HEREBY APPROVE THE ABANDONMENT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS LISTED WITHIN NOTE 7 ON SHEET 2.
ACCEPTED FOR RECORD AND FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF PLACER
COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE REQUEST OF OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY, AT _____ MINUTES AFTER _____ O'CLOCK__M. ON THE ____ DAY OF ________, 2024 AND RECORDED IN BOOK _____ OF MAPS, AT PAGE _____.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN JUNE, 2022. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE
CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 2025, THAT THE MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO
ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP.
DATE ___________________
______________________________________
JOHN KARL JEFFRIES L.S. 7820
EXPIRES 12/31/2025
DATED_____________ ___________________________________
OWNER'S STATEMENT:
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTERESTS IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" SHOWN UPON THIS MAP AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO
THE PREPARATION AND RECORDING OF THIS MAP AND OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WATER, GAS AND SEWER PIPES, AND FOR POLES AND OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND
WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR ELECTRIC, TELEVISION AND TELEPHONE SERVICES AND
TRAFFIC CONTROL APPURTENANCES TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES
PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE DRIVES, STREET AND
WAYS AND THOSE STRIPS OF LAND LYING CONTIGUOUS TO THE DRIVES, STREET AND
WAYS, LOTS 'A', 'B' AND 'C' AND THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT).
(B) PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INGRESS AND EGRESS OF EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND
UTILITY MAINTENANCE VEHICLES, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES
PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "M.A.E." (MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT) THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
(A) AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (INCLUDING ALL IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) THE STREETS
SHOWN HEREON AS WESTBROOK BOULEVARD, VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD, SILVER
SPRUCE DRIVE, POGONIA STREET, MILKWEED WAY, DOG HOBBLE WAY, ALUMROOT DRIVE, BALSAMROOT DRIVE AND HEARTLEAF WAY.
(B) LOTS 'A', 'B' AND 'C' SHOWN HEREON AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES.
(C) LOT 'D' SHOWN HEREON AS OPEN SPACE FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" AND FIND IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP ON FILE
AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND ALL APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATED_____________
_______________________________________
MARC STOUT R.C.E. 69879
CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
EXPIRATION DATE 09/30/2024
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS PLAT OF "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1" IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
For Marc Stout, City Engineer, City of Roseville
DATED_____________
_______________________________________
TIMOTHY G. BLAIR
P.L.S. 8278 EXPIRATION DATE 12/31/2025
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:
JOB NO. 22-02-005
STA TE OF CA LIFORNIA
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 1 OF 10
TITLE:
PRINT NAME:
TITLE:
PRINT NAME:
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE
IDENTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF PLACER
ON _____________, 2024, BEFORE ME, _________________________________ A NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME AND TITLE OF OFFICER)
PERSONALLY APPEARED ____________________________________________________________
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S)
WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO
ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES),
AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
MY COMMISSION # IS _________________.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ____________. ____________________________________
MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN NOTARY PUBLIC
___________________________ COUNTY.
____________________________________
PRINT NAME
BY: BY:
CARMEN AVALOS
CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
1. ALL BEARINGS ALONG CURVED LINES ARE CHORD MEASUREMENTS.
2. THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 35.355 ACRES MORE OR LESS, CONTAINING 78 RESIDENTIAL LOTS NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 78, THREE (3) LANDSCAPE LOTS LETTERED LOTS 'A', 'B' AND 'C', ONE (1) LOT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES LETTERED LOT 'D' AND TWO (2) LOTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, NUMBERED LOTS 79 AND 80.
3. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.
4. A PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY YOUNGDAHL CONSULTING GROUP, PROJECT NO. E13171.013, DATED JANUARY 22, 2021. A COPY OF THIS REPORT IS
AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (FILE NUMBER 308-810A).
5. ALL REAR PROPERTY CORNERS AND ANGLE POINTS SHALL BE MONUMENTED WITH A 5/8" REBAR WITH METAL CAP STAMPED "LS7820". IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT WITH A RETAINING WALL OR FENCE, A 3.0' WITNESS CORNER SHALL BE SET ONLINE.
6. ALL FRONT PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE MONUMENTED WITH A 1" BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS7820", 1.0' FROM PROPERTY CORNER INTO THE SIDEWALK ON A PROJECTION OF PROPERTY LINE AT FRONT AND/OR SIDE LOT LINES PRODUCED.
7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 66499.20.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, THE LANDS SHOWN
HEREON ARE HEREBY MERGED AND RESUBDIVIDED AND THE FOLLOWING RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY ABANDONED:
(A) THE IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION IN FEE FOR RIGHT- OF-WAY SHOWN AS
SIERRA GLEN DRIVE ON THAT LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN BOOK 'EE' OF MAPS, AT PAGE 6.
(B) THE 30.0' WIDE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT (M.A.E.) AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) SHOWN ON, OVER AND ACROSS LOT 25 AS SHOWN ON THAT LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN BOOK 'EE' OF MAPS, AT PAGE 6. (C) THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (P.U.E.) AND PASEO EASEMENT (P.E.) OF VARYING WIDTHS SHOWN ON, OVER AND ACROSS LOTS 22 AND 25 AS SHOWN ON THAT LARGE LOT SUBDIVISION MAP FILED IN BOOK 'EE' OF MAPS, AT PAGE 6.
8. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR "SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASES 1 AND 2" ARE BEING FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS FINAL MAP AS DOCUMENT NO. 2024-___________________, O.R.P.C.
NOTES:
FND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
(R) RADIAL LINE
P.U.E.
LEGEND:
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SET BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF
ROSEVILLE MONUMENT WELL STAMPED L.S. 7820
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 9570" PER FF BM 51
S.D.E. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
REFERENCES:
(1) RECORD PER EE BM 6
(2) RECORD PER EE BM 33
(3) RECORD PER FF BM 51
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS IDENTICAL TO THE CENTERLINE OF VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD, BEING N 88°55'34" E AND ESTABLISHED BY MONUMENTS FOUND AS SHOWN HEREON PER EE BM 6.
SHEET 2 OF 10
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 2 OF 10
BASIS OF BEARINGS
N 88°55'34" E 1,515.55' (1)(2)
N 87°02'25" E 243.51' (1)
N 28°34'45" W
352.76' (1)
36.97'
(1)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
LOT 'B'
11 12 13 14 15 16
58 59
60 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63
61 62
57 21 20 19 18 17 22
23 24
25 26 27 28 29
36 35 34 33 32 31 30 37
38 39
40 41
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
56 74 75
76 77
78 LOT 'A'
LOT 'C'
LOT 80
LOT 79
LOT 'A'
S 77°48'55" E 199.29' (1)
N 65°02'33" E
78.26' (1)
N 37°14'12" E
77.00' (1) N 08°07'52" E
66.81' (1)
N 23°17'10" W
47.45' (1)
N 19°45'43" E
11.14' (1)
N 88°55'34" E 600.20' (1) N 74°12'30" E 245.42'
(1)
L=248.14' R=483.00' ∆=29°26'07"
N 28°34'45" W
7.71' (1)
N 15°27'21" E 43.10'
L=47.65' R=31.00'
∆=88°04'12" (1)
N
23°59'49" W
284.72'
(1)
L=285.02' R=1,782.00' ∆=9°09'51"
S 28°34'45" E
180.96'
S 0°02'42" W
120.00' (1)
71.79'
S 1°29'56" E 43.26' (1)
L=43.27' R=1,440.00'
∆=1°43'17"
N 81°36'42" W
60.83' (1)
S 88°55'34" W
120.00' (1)
S 79°27'49" W
60.83' (1)
17 6.7
4' (1)
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
115.4
5' (1)
N 13°0
0 5' 7" W
413.84'
(1)
L
=
416.8
5' R
=1,0
0 0.0
0' ∆
=
23°53
0' 1"
N
24°57'27" W
438.24' (1)
230.96' (1)
121.79' (1)
N
0°3
8 1' 7" W
2 6
3.9 0' (1)
443.86'(3)
1,071.69'
S 14°25'44" E 733.39'
L=740.90' R=1,500.00'
∆=28°18'01" (1)
206.54' (1)
S
17°50'27" E
54 0.34 ' L
=
54 3.5
1' R
=
1,4
5 0.0
0' =
21°2
8'3
5" (1) ∆
N
14 °36'3
1" W
724 .2
7' L
=
7 3
1.5 0' R
=1,5
0 0.0
0' =
2 7°5
6 '2
8" (1) ∆
S
20°09'55" E
120.00'
S 27°51'44" E 39.04'
L=39.04' R=1,560.00'
∆=1°26'01"
S 22°21'07" E 20.90'
L=20.90' R=1,550.00'
∆=0°46'21"
N 5°55'46" W 173.69'
L=173.90' R=1,026.00'
∆=9°42'40" (1)
N 17°28'54" W
119.65' (1)
377.84' (1)
N 21°13'11" W 132.86'
L=132.96' R=1,019.00'
∆=7°28'33"
4 6.4
5' (1)
N 46°04'26" W 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00' ∆=90°00'00"
1,109.22' (1)
S 44°08'38" W 70.44'
L=78.16' R=50.00'
∆=89°33'51" (1)
LOT 'D'
FND 3/4" IRON PIPE TAGGED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
(R) RADIAL LINE
P.U.E.
LEGEND:
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
SET BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF
ROSEVILLE MONUMENT WELL STAMPED L.S. 7820
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 7944" PER EE BM 6
FND BRASS MONUMENT IN STANDARD CITY OF ROSEVILLE
MONUMENT WELL STAMPED "L.S. 9570" PER FF BM 51
S.D.E. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
REFERENCES:
(1) RECORD PER EE BM 6
(2) RECORD PER EE BM 33
(3) RECORD PER FF BM 51
10.00'
S 28°34'45" E (R)
38.00'
N 61°25'15" E 91.00'
19.00' 19.00'
S 16°25'15" W 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00'
∆=90°00'00"
S 73°34'45" E 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00'
∆=90°00'00"
SHEET 3 OF 10
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 100'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 3 OF 10
30.0' M.A.E.
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
N 82°53'51" E (R)
N 87°38'26" E (R)
N 79°12'55" E (R)
N 72°31'06" E (R)
ALUMROOT DRIVE
DOG HOBBLE WAY
POGONIA STREET
HEARTLEAF
WAY
SILVER SPRUCE
DRIVE
BALSAMROOT
DRIVE
POGONIA
STREET
SHEET 9
SHEET 8
SHEET 7
SHEET 6
SHEET 5
SHEET 4
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND NOTES
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
S 70°35'06" W (R)
S 68°02'04" W (R)
S 01°04'26" E (R)
20'x20' BUS SHELTER
EASEMENT PER (1)
WESTBROOK
BOULEVA
RD
SEE
DETAIL 'A'
DETAIL 'A'
SCALE: 1" = 40'
S 62°51'17" W (R)
50.00' 290.24'
S 46°04'26" E
21.21'
N 88°55'34" E 697.79'
N 44°08'38" E 99.37'
N
0°3
8 1' 7" W 121.5
5'
N 12°3
8 1' 1" W
5 8
8.31' L
=
5 9
2.6 3' R
=1,415.00' ∆
=
23°59'48"
N 65°21'55" E (R) 110.00'
S 23°46'51" E 38.90'
L=38.90' R=1,305.00'
∆=1°42'29"
S 67°04'24" W (R) 152.07'
S 21°48'54" E
41.95'
S 71°13'27" W
59.85'
S 76°30'49" W
54.99'
S 81°02'17" W
S 88°55'34" W 240
65.62'
.00'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9' S
01°0
4'2
6" E
4 2.0
0'
S 88°55'34" W 18.51'
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 19
3.71'
S 46°04'26" E 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
N 88°55'34" E
10.40'
S
01°0
4'2
6" E
4 2.0
0'
S 88°55'34" W
8.40'
N 14°3
6 3' 1" W
6 8
3.2 3' L
=
690.04' R
=
1,415.00' ∆
=
27°56
2' 8"
S 17°5
0'2
7" E
5 4
0.34' L
=
543.51' R
=
1,450.00' ∆=21°28
3' 5"
S 84°44'21" E 90.63'
N 88°55'34" E (R)
4.00'
S 46°04'26" E 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00' ∆=90°00'00"
9.00'
7 3.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E
8 2.0
0'
250.67'
N 88°55'34" E 150.16'
S 0°02'42" W 120.00'
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
S 79°27'49" W
60.83'
N 81°36'42" W
60.83'
S 88°55'34" W 120.00'
S
0°3
8 1' 7" E 17
6.7 4'
S 1°29'56" E 43.26'
L=43.27' R=1,440.00' ∆=1°43'17"
S 88°55'34" W 1,109.22'
S 44°08'38" W
70.44'
R=50.00'
L=78.16'
∆=89°33'51"
SHEET 4 OF 10
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 60'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 4 OF 10
LOT 80
10.591 ACRES
LOT 'A'
1.328 ACRES
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
S 01°04'26" E (R)
20'x20' BUS SHELTER
EASEMENT PER (1)
N 87°38'26" E (R)
N 82°53'51" E (R)
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
WESTBROOK
BOULEVARD
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
HEARTLEAF
WAY
12.5' P.U.E.
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED
WITH THIS MAP.
N 28°34'45" W
145.31'
S 12°01'39" E
30.23'
N 88°55'34" E
60.72'
S
9°00
0' 0" E
R( )
107
7. 8'
N 82°11'01" E 42.18'
L=42.18' R=1,021.00' ∆=2°22'02" N 39°38'11" E 30.42'
L=33.58' R=22.00' ∆=87°27'42"
N 2°35'04" W 14.29'
L=14.29' R=271.00' ∆=3°01'14"
N 88°55'34" E (R)
42.00'
S 2°32'52" E 11.78'
L=11.78' R=229.00' ∆=2°56'52"
S 47°57'52" E 30.53'
L=33.75' R=22.00' ∆=87°53'08"
N 88°30'34" E 14.85'
L=14.85' R=1,021.00' ∆=0°50'00"
N 88°55'34" E
72.56'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
110.0
0'
N 88°55'34" E 440.00'
N 79°21'47" E 171.14'
N 28°34'45" W
12.62' N 61°25'15" E 110.00'
N 28°34'45" W
31.47'
N 61°25'15" E (R)
42.00'
N 61°25'15" E
82.00'
S 28°34'45" E (R)
4.00'
N 16°25'15" E 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00' ∆=90°00'00"
N 28°34'45" W
180.96'
N 27°51'44" W 39.04'
L=39.04' R=1,560.00'
∆=1°26'01"
N
20°09'55" W
120.00'
N 22°21'07" W 20.90'
L=20.90' R=1,550.00'
∆=0°46'21"
S 87°02'25" W 243.51'
S
23°59'49" E
284.72'
L=285.02' R=1,782.00' ∆=9°09'51"
S 28°34'45" E
7.71'
S 15°27'21" W 43.10'
L=47.65' R=31.00' ∆=88°04'12"
S 74°12'30" W 245.42'
L=248.14' R=483.00' ∆=29°26'07"
S 88°55'34" W 600.20'
S 19°45'43" W
11.14'
S 23°17'10" E
47.45'
S
08°07'52" W
66.81'
S 37°14'12" W
19.14'
6.00'
S 73°34'45" E 31.11'
L=34.56' R=22.00'
∆=90°00'00"
N 61°25'15" E (R)
48.68'
N 32°36'31" W 33.03'
L=33.05' R=235.00'
∆=8°03'31"
SHEET 5 OF 10
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 60'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 5 OF 10
30.0' M.A.E. &
P.U.E.
LOT 79
6.130 ACRES
WESTBROOK BOULVARD
S 70°35'06" W (R)
S 68°02'04" W (R)
S 67°15'43" W (R)
S 62°51'17" W (R)
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
BALSAMROOT
DRIVE
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
L2
S 88°55'34" W (R)
42.00'
N
21°13'11" W
136.12' L=136.22' ∆
=7°28'33"
R=1,044.00'
N 19°37'30" W 55.24'
L=55.25' ∆=3°01'55"
N 19°43'52" W 79.99'
L=80.01' ∆=4°29'56"
21.00'
S 75°23'10" W 359.11' L=361.06' R=1,000.00' ∆=20°41'15" 1 7,765 S.F.
LOT 'C'
4,993
S.F.
2 6,720 S.F.
3 6,773 S.F.
4 6,415 S.F.
25 8,946 S.F.
26 7,444 S.F. 27
7,062 S.F.
28 7,024 S.F.
29 8,197 S.F.
30 6,682 S.F.
31 6,682 S.F.
32 6,682 S.F.
33 6,682 S.F.
34 6,546 S.F.
35 6,125 S.F.
36 7,288 S.F.
37 7,596 S.F.
38 7,092 S.F.
39 6,050 S.F.
40 6,050 S.F.
41 8,841 S.F.
42 7,863 S.F.
43 6,627 S.F.
74 6,403 S.F. 75
7,098 S.F.
76 5,889 S.F.
77 7,406 S.F.
78 10,006 S.F.
S
7°46
3' 9" E 111 4. 2'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N
9°00
0' 0" W
R( ) 107.78'
N 12°01 3' 9" W
R( ) 147
9. 8'
N 15°03 1' 8" W
R(
) 108 1. 7'
N
18°29 4' 4" W
107
2. 5
N
'
21°58'50" W
(R)
147.06'
N 88°55'34" E
60.72'
S 74°19'17" W 321.05' L=322.38' R=1,021.00' ∆=18°05'29" S
24°57'27" E
185.88'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
8'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 114.5
6'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 110.0
6'
S 13°18
4' 6" E
R(
) 117
7. 5'
S
1 7°51
2' 5" E
71 2. 7'
S 65°02'33" W 110.00'
S 65°02'33" W 110.00'
S 65°02'33" W 110.00'
S 65°02'33" W 112.00'
S 65°02'33" W 112.04'
S 65°02'33" W 114.32'
S 65°02'33" W 119.45'
N 68°13'22" E 136.10'
.00' ∆=23°26
5' 1"
S 76°59'53" W (R) 124.30' N
9°45
3' 8" W 131 9. 0'
19 3.71'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 19
3.71'
21.0 0' 21.0
0'
55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55 55.00' 55 .00' 57 .00' .74'
54.15' 38.43' 15.03' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' N 88°55'34" E
N 88°55'34" E 217.94'
61.51' 156.43'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 13
8 8. 8'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 13
0 6. 1'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 12
7 7. 1'
N 88°55'34" E
55 65.00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' .00'
21.3 3'
45 7. 3' 86 1. 7'
94.57'
94.66'
55.00' 55.00' 69.21'
114.70' 64.51'
S
24° 57' 27"
E
S
24°57'27" E
205.92'
217.94'
113.43'
195.80'
205.92'
C5
C7
N
16°56
5' 7" W
40 2. 9'
41.52' 55.00' 55.00' 44.29'
20.75' 55.00' 60.00' 60.00'
10.17'
65.18'
N
21°24'14" W
152.21'
80.53' 14.04'
10 5.71'
55 43.00' 15 .00' .43'
52.94' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00'
S 79°23'25" W 220.84' L=221.29' ∆=12°40'44"
S 82°16'37" W 226.71' L=227.22' R=979.00' ∆=13°17'52"
11.82'
117
7. 5'
73.84' 78.27' 31.36'
57.85'
16.21' 60.65'
S
24°57'27" E
50.51'
N
21°24'14" W
76.30'
41 2. 6'
S 84°43'43" W 142.06'
L=144.04' R=250.00' ∆=33°00'43"
C17
S 84°43'43" W 153.99' L=156.14' ∆=33°00'43"
R=271.00'
R=229.00'
S 84°43'43" W 130.12' L=131.94' ∆=33°00'43"
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
2 7
9 7. 1'
1)
S 69°02'48" W 139.66'
L=139.77' ∆=8°00'31"
S 65°02'33" W
45.73'
N
24°57'27" W
438.24'
293.08' 145.16'
184.69' 47.99' 145.16'
C1
C
2 C3
N
4°16 1' 2" W
41.2 2'
S 68°16'43" W 75.10'
L=75.12' ∆=4°23'48" S 78°06'17" W 84.61'
L=84.64' ∆=4°57'12"
S 83°09'20" W 87.94'
L=87.97' ∆=5°08'55"
S 87°19'41" W
54.60'
L=54.61'
∆=3°11'46"
C4
11.11'
N 16°19'08" E
7.88'
S 21°18'46" E 34.46'
L=34.48' ∆=7°17'23"
C6
C8
S 21°27'45" E 27.92'
L=27.94' ∆=6°59'25"
R=271.00'
R
=229.00'
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
L1
R=22.00'
R=22.00'
N 39°38'11" E
30.42'
L=33.58'
∆=87°27'42"
S 47°57'52" E 30.53'
L=33.75' ∆=87°53'08"
S 2°35'04" E 14.29'
L=14.29' R=271.00'
∆=3°01'14"
S 2°40'19" E 13.94'
L=13.95' R=250.00' ∆=3°11'46"
S 2°32'52" E 11.78'
L=11.78' R=229.00'
∆=2°56'52"
21.00'
R=22.00'
R
=22.00'
R=22.00'
S 43°55'34" W
31.11'
L=34.56'
∆=90°00'00"
N 46°04'26" W
31.11'
L=34.56'
∆=90°00'00"
S 68°22'03" E 30.24'
L=33.34' ∆=86°49'11"
C15
C16
N 24°41'50" W 9.49'
L=9.49' ∆=0°31'15"
N 22°47'20" W 60.04'
L=60.05' ∆=3°17'44"
S 77°48'55" E 199.29'
N 65°02'33" E 78.26'
N 37°14'12" E
77.00'
15.82'
C18
S 82°27'32" W
75.40'
L=75.75'
∆=18°57'06"
N 83°24'55" W
37.13'
L=37.17'
∆=9°18'00"
C19
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 12
7 7. 1'
S 72°27'18" W
40.00' L=40.04'
∆=8°27'52"
S 82°13'41" W
52.33'
L=52.42'
∆=11°04'54"
N 86°23'14" W
55.18'
L=55.28'
∆=11°41'15"
S 84°39'43" E
47.05'
L=47.13'
∆=11°47'35"
19.23' 73.35'
N 79°39'16" W
8.41' L=8.41'
∆=1°46'41"
N 89°11'02" E
2.06' L=2.06'
∆=0°30'56"
C20
S 88°30'34" W 14.85'
L=14.85' R=1,021.00'
∆=0°50'00"
S 85°40'41" W
=
20°16
0' 2"
R
=
22.00'
R=979.00'
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
4 2.0
0'
18.51'
377.84' N
21°13'11" W
132.86'
R=1,019.00' L=132.96' ∆
=7°28'33"
LOT 'B'
31,291
S.F.
1.41'
LOT
D' ' 1
5, 42
S
F. .
N
18°29 4' 4" W
99 3. 4'
C44
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
LENGTH
48.57'
37.36'
10.65'
30.53'
55.78'
35.27'
34.94'
35.94'
42.18'
53.95'
RADIUS
31.00'
31.00'
21.00'
550.00'
1,000.00'
22.00'
250.00'
22.00'
1,021.00'
1,021.00'
DELTA
89°46'00"
69°02'43"
29°03'02"
3°10'49"
3°11'46"
91°51'18"
8°00'31"
93°35'44"
2°22'02"
3°01'39"
CHORD
DIRECTION
S 69°50'27" E
S 13°07'07" W
S 51°15'20" W
N 23°22'03" W
S 87°19'41" W
N 63°35'44" W
S 20°57'12" E
S 28°49'49" W
S 82°11'01" W
S 79°29'10" W
CHORD
LENGTH
43.75'
35.14'
10.53'
30.52'
55.78'
31.61'
34.92'
32.07'
42.18'
53.94'
LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
DIRECTION
N 24°43'27" W
S 65°32'41" E
LENGTH
4.00'
9.05'
C11
C12
C13
53.95'
53.81'
54.60'
1,021.00'
1,021.00'
1,021.00'
3°01'39"
3°01'10"
3°03'51"
S 76°27'31" W
S 73°26'07" W
S 69°33'06" W
53.94'
53.80'
54.60'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
48.89'
49.20'
58.22'
53.71'
52.95'
39.71'
18.51'
1,021.00'
229.00'
271.00'
250.00'
1,019.00'
271.00'
271.00'
2°44'37"
12°18'31"
12°18'31"
12°18'31"
2°58'37"
8°23'45"
3°54'46"
S 66°38'51" W
S 84°55'11" E
S 84°55'11" E
S 84°55'11" E
N 23°28'09" W
S 86°52'34" E
S 80°43'18" E
48.89'
49.10'
58.11'
53.60'
52.94'
39.68'
18.50'
C44 15.00' 1,021.00' 0°50'30" S 71°30'16" W 15.00'
SHEET 6 OF 10
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 6 OF 10
N 88°55'34" E
576.08'
N 65°33'48" E (R)
N 68°51'32" E (R)
N 71°53'27" E (R)
N
09°25'07" W
(R)
N
04°16 1' 2" W
R( )
N
0 2°13'5
2" W
R( )
N
0 9°2
7 2' 4" E
R( )
S
0 0°3
3 3' 0" E
R( )
N 17°01 0' 1" W
R( )
N
01°5
6'0
5" W
R( )
S
0 7°19 1' 9" W
R( )
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
21' 21'
ALUMROOT DRIVE
12.5' P.U.E.
21' 21'
21' 21'
21' 21'
21'
21' 21'
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
DOG HOBBLE WAY
POGONIA
STREET
DOG HOBBLE WAY
21' 21'
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5'
P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATED
WITH
THIS
MAP.
N
53°16'1
1" W
(R)
N 24°13'09" W (R)
(R)
P.U.E.
P.U.E.
SILVER SPRUCE
DRIVE
19'
19'
N
18°04
2' 8" W
R(
)
N
18°54
5' 9" W
R(
)
S 88°55'34" W (R)
42.00'
21.00'
73 6,050 S.F.
72 6,050 S.F.
71 6,050 S.F.
70 6,050 S.F.
69 6,050 S.F.
68 6,050 S.F.
67 6,050 S.F.
66 6,050 S.F.
30 6,682 S.F.
31 6,682 S.F.
32 6,682 S.F.
33 6,682 S.F.
34 6,546 S.F.
35 6,125 S.F.
36 7,288 S.F.
44 6,050 S.F.
45 6,050 S.F.
46 6,050 S.F.
47 6,050 S.F.
48 6,600 S.F.
49 6,600 S.F.
51 6,600 S.F.
52 6,600 S.F.
50 6,600 S.F.
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
9'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 121.4
8'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 114.5
6'
S 1°0
4 2' 4" E 110.0
6'
S 13°18
4' 6" E
R(
) 117
7. 5'
21.0 0' 21.0
0'
55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55 55.00' 55 .00' 57 .00' .74'
38.43' 15.03' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 60.00'
N
60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 62.6
88°55'34" E
N 88°55'34" E 217.94'
61.51' 156.43'
N 88°55'34" E 440.00'
N 88°55'34" E 576.08'
576.08'
576.08'
72.56' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00'
55.78'
55 55.00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' .00' 217.94'
113.43'
S 88°55'34" W 240.00'
60 44.25' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' .00' C5
14.04'
55 43.00' 15 .00' .43'
52.94' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00'
R=979.00' ∆=13°1
S 84°43'43" W 142.06'
L=144.04' R=250.00' ∆=33°00'43"
C17
S 84°43'43" W 153.99' L=156.14' ∆=33°00'43"
R=271.00'
R=229.00'
S 84°43'43" W 130.12' L=131.94' ∆=33°00'43"
N
4°16 1' 2" W
41.2 2'
R=22.00'
R=22.00'
S 47°57'52" E 30.53'
L=33.75' ∆=87°53'08"
S 2°40'19" E 13.94'
L=13.95' R=250.00' ∆=3°11'46"
S 2°32'52" E 11.78'
L=11.78' R=229.00'
∆=2°56'52"
21.00'
R=22.00'
R
=22.00'
C15
C16
C19
S 82°13'41" W
52.33'
L=52.42'
∆=11°04'54"
N 86°23'14" W
55.18'
L=55.28'
∆=11°41'15"
S 84°39'43" E
47.05'
L=47.13'
∆=11°47'35"
19.23'
N 79°39'16" W
8.41' L=8.41'
∆=1°46'41"
N 89°11'02" E
2.06' L=2.06'
∆=0°30'56"
C20
S 88°30'34" W 14.85'
L=14.85' R=1,021.00'
∆=0°50'00"
576.08'
576.08'
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
4 2.0
0'
18.51'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C15
C16
C17
49.20'
58.22'
53.71'
229.00'
271.00'
250.00'
12°18'31"
12°18'31"
12°18'31"
S 84°55'11" E
S 84°55'11" E
S 84°55'11" E
49.10'
58.11'
53.60'
JOB NO. 22-02-005
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 7 OF 10
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
S
0 0°3
3 3' 0" E
R( )
N
0 2°13'5
2" W
R( )
N
0 9°2
7 2' 4" E
R( )
N 85°40'41" E
21' 21'
ALUMROOT DRIVE
12.5' P.U.E.
21' 21'
21' 21'
DOG HOBBLE WAY
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
N 61°25'15" E
216.00'
71.79'
9.00'
8.52'
58 6,775 S.F.
59 6,691 S.F.
60 7,484 S.F.
65 6,305 S.F.
64 8,924 S.F.
63 8,992 S.F.
61 6,600 S.F.
62 8,732 S.F.
57 7,725 S.F.
53 6,714 S.F.
54 7,101 S.F.
55 7,097 S.F.
56 7,126 S.F.
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
S
2°4
4 3' 1" E
R( ) 110
2. 7'
S
9°05
5' 8" E
R( ) 110
6. 8'
S
1 5°27
2' 6" E
R(
)
1 1
1 2. 2'
S
21°48'54" E
(R)
112.00'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 119.2
7'
S
9°50 1' 5" E
R( ) 125
6. 5'
N 61°25'15" E 110.00'
N 61°25'15" E 110.00'
110.07'
N 65°21'55" E (R) 110.00'
N 62°46'14" E (R) 110.00'
S 61°25'15" W 110.00'
60.00' 62.63' 30.08'
40.12' 25.50' 44.64'
S 67°04'24" W (R) 152.07'
21.00' 21.00'
60.00' 76.65'
N 28°34'45" W
124.04'
N 79°21'47" E 171.14'
N 62°40'47" E
77.75'
N 28°34'45" W
166.79'
55.00' 55.00'
52.13' 63.23' 55.78'
55.00'
34.11'
34.01'
S 71°13'27" W
59.85'
N 76°30'49" E
54.99'
N 81°02'17" E
65.62'
S 88°55'34" W 240.00'
70.05'
S
21°48'54" E
41.95'
60 44.25' .00'
N 75°48'10" E 217.51' L=219.42' R=479.00' ∆=26°14'47"
N 75°48'10" E 227.04' L=229.04' R=500.00' ∆=26°14'47"
N 75°48'10" E 236.58' L=238.66' R=521.00' ∆=26°14'47"
76.79'
151.05'
45.00' 121.79' C22
N
25°07'25" W
98.44'
L=98.46' ∆=4°23'37"
C21
C23
59.58' 60.00' 31.47'
48.00' 28.79'
73.00'
91.00' 125.00'
82.00'
576.08'
576.08'
N
14°36'31" W
683.23'
L=690.04' R=1,415.00' ∆=27°56'28"
N
14°36'31" W
724.27'
(1)
L=731.50' R=1,500.00' ∆=27°56'28"
N 28°34'45" W
83.79 28
'
.79' 55.00'
C27
C26
N 23°46'51" W 38.90'
R=1305.00' ∆=1°42'29"
R=22.0
0'
C29
R=22.00'
N 74°37'38" E 92.41'
L=92.55' ∆=11°04'15"
N 84°32'39" E 73.19'
L=73.26' ∆=8°45'48"
C24
N 65°25'57" E
50.04'
L=50.06'
N 71°21'50" E ∆=5°30'19"
57.78' L=57.81'
∆=6°21'28"
N 77°43'18" E
57.78' L=57.81'
∆=6°21'28"
N 84°04'46" E
57.78' L=57.81'
∆=6°21'28"
N 88°05'31" E
15.17' L=15.17'
∆=1°40'04"
N 17°03'01" E 31.45'
L=35.04' ∆=91°15'32"
C25
N 27°54'16" W
33.33' L=33.33'
∆=1°20'58"
N
25°55'56" W
64.08' L=64.08'
∆=2°35'41"
N
73°34'45" W
21.21' L3
L4
C
28 S 73°34'45" E 31.11'
L=34.56' ∆=90°00'00"
S 61°25'15" W (R)
42.00'
21.00' 21.00'
N 28°34'45" W
352.76' (1)
121.79' (1)
C30
C31
10.35'
LOT 'A'
1.328 ACRES
10.00'
82.00'
S 28°34'45" E
38.00'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C21
C22
C23
C24
C25
C26
C27
C28
C29
C30
C31
28.21'
126.67'
128.74'
53.61'
35.32'
30.74'
59.10'
34.56'
53.08'
48.69'
48.69'
1,284.00'
1,284.00'
1,305.00'
479.00'
22.00'
1,305.00'
1,305.00'
22.00'
1,263.00'
31.00'
31.00'
1°15'32"
5°39'09"
5°39'09"
6°24'44"
91°59'08"
1°20'58"
2°35'41"
90°00'00"
2°24'28"
90°00'00"
90°00'00"
N 27°56'59" W
N 25°45'11" W
N 25°45'11" W
N 65°53'09" E
N 71°19'39" W
N 27°54'16" W
N 25°55'56" W
S 16°25'15" W
N 24°07'51" W
N 16°25'15" E
N 73°34'45" W
28.21'
126.62'
128.69'
53.58'
31.65'
30.74'
59.09'
31.11'
53.07'
43.84'
43.84'
LINE TABLE
LINE # DIRECTION LENGTH
L3
L4
N 28°34'45" W
N 28°34'45" W
4.00'
4.00'
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 8 OF 10
SHEET 8 OF 10
N 88°55'34" E 576.08'
21' 21'
HEARTLEAF
WAY
BALSAMROOT
ALUMROOT DRIVE
21' 21'
21' 21'
23' 23'
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E. 12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
S 20°54'30" E (R)
WESTBROOK
BOULEVARD
50'
DRIVE
60'
=7°28'33"
L=80.01' ∆=4°29'56"
50.00' 290.24'
LOT 'B'
31,291 S.F.
5 7,019 S.F.
6 7,325 S.F.
7 7,088 S.F.
8 9,357 S.F.
9 14,467 S.F.
10 8,214 S.F. 11
6,409 S.F.
12 6,075 S.F.
13 6,600 S.F.
14 6,600 S.F.
15 6,600 S.F.
16 7,484 S.F.
17 7,046 S.F.
18 6,050 S.F.
19 6,050 S.F.
20 6,050 S.F.
21 6,049 S.F. 22
8,720 S.F.
23 7,495 S.F.
24 9,711 S.F.
S
1 7°51
2' 5" E
S 65°02'33" W 119.45'
N 69°30'52" E (R) 125.01'
N 76°41'51" E (R) 124.49'
N 80°29'39" E (R) 120.34'
S 66°55'46" W (R) 113.78'
S
1 6°27'22" W
(R)
1 1
7.89'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 112.2
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 110.0
0'
N 88°55'34" E 293.51'
N 68°13'22" E 136.10'
N 13°14'0
2" W
2 2
3.51' L
=
2 2
5.08' R
=
550.00' ∆=23°26
5' 1"
S 82°31'08" W (R) 120.51'
S 76°59'53" W (R) 124.30' N
9°45
3' 8" W 131 9. 0'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 10
9.6 6'
N 88°55'34" E 516.31'
248.51'
250.51'
19 3.71'
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 19
3.71'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W 110
0. 0'
N 88°55'34" E
55 65.00' 55 .00' 55 .00' 55 .00' .00'
8 8.3
3' 21.3
3'
45 7. 3' 86 1. 7'
94.57'
94.66'
S
1 7°28
5' 4" E
121
1. 0'
S 1°04'26" E
22.45'
44.29'
20.75'
80.53' 14.04'
7 3.0
0'
60 48.00' 60 .00' 60 .00' 20 .00' .51'
42.51' 55.00' 55.00' 55.00' 43.00'
8 8.0
0'
80.97' 90.34' 55.00' 55.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 55.00' N 43°55'34" E
S 46°04'26" E 21.21'
28.28'
N 88°55'34" E
N 88
53.40'
°55'34" E
50.00'
7.54'
N 15°0
4 3' 2" W 18
1. 5
7' L
=182.48' R
=
529.00' ∆=19°45
5' 1"
R
=
5 71.0
0' N 10°2
0 1' 3" W 14
4.7 5' L
=14
5 1. 4' ∆
=14°33
5' 0"
N
5°5
8 1' 1" W 17
9.3 9' L
=17
9.6 0' R
=1,0
51.0 0' ∆
=
9°4
7'2
8"
N 10°11'08" W 24.93'
L=24.94' ∆=1°21'34"
N
6°51'2
5" W
9 7 1. 5'
L
=
9 7 1. 8' ∆
=
5°17
5' 2"
N 2°38'28" W 57.48'
L=57.49' ∆=3°08'02"
41 2. 6' 50
6. 5' 29
1. 9'
N 9°56'18" W 62.09'
L=62.12' ∆=6°43'42"
N 16°53'38" W 66.28'
L=66.32' ∆=7°10'59"
N 22°43'18" W 41.28'
L=41.29' ∆=4°28'20"
S 84°4
L=144.04' R
S
S 84°43'43" W 1
16 6.0
0' 3
8.0 0'
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
2 0
4 0. 0' N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
2 7
9 7. 1'
21.0 0' 21.0
0'
8 2.0
0'
9 2.0
0'
7 3.0
0'
N 88°55'34" E (R)
4.00'
S 46°04'26" E 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00' ∆=90°00'00"
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E
8 2.0
0'
N
01°0
4'2
6" W
4 2.0
0'
N 88°55'34" E
10.40'
N 88°55'34" E
8.40'
LOT 'A'
1.328 ACRES
S 46°04'26" E 31.11'
L=34.56' ∆=90°00'00"
S 43°55'34" W 31.11'
L=34.56' ∆=90°00'00"
N 46°04'26" W
31.11'
L=34.56'
∆=90°00'00"
N 43°55'34" E
31.11'
L=34.56'
∆=90°00'00"
R=22.00'
R=22.00'
R
=22.0
R
0'
=22.00'
S 01°30'36" E
26.69'
9.00'
19.00'
R=31.0
0'
N 43°55'34" E 43.84'
L=48.69' ∆=90°00'00"
S 88°55'34" W (R)
4.00'
N 86°18'37" W 120.42'
N 88°55'34" E 227.00'
347.00'
S 46°04'26" E 43.84'
L=48.69' R=31.00' ∆=90°00'00"
N 1°0
4 2' 6" W
115.4
5' (1)
3 6.4
5'
(1)
4 6.4
5'
N 13°0
0 5' 7" W
413.8
4' L
=
416.8
5' R
=1,000.00' ∆
=
23°53
0' 1"
(1)
S
46°51'46" E 98.95'
L
=13
0.83' R=52.00' ∆=144°09'20"
171.31'
C4
R=22.00'
10.00'
625.31'
N 11°3
8 3' 7" W 19
3.5 4' L
=194.55' ∆
=
20°16
0' 2"
R
=
22.00'
N 15°18'38" W 46.00'
L=46.01' ∆=4°37'01"
S 70°36'10" W 19.02'
L=19.03' R=229.00'
∆=4°45'37" S 25°18'07" W 29.96'
L=32.96' ∆=85°50'30"
N 10°14'30" W 55.00'
L=55.02' ∆=5°31'16"
N 5°16'05" W 44.10'
L=44.11' ∆=4°25'33"
S 47°03'52" E 30.57'
L=33.80' ∆=88°01'08"
R=22.00' C32
C33
C34
C35
C36 C37
C38
C3
9 C43
S 89°30'38" E
12.50' L=12.50'
∆=3°07'37"
S 81°40'43" E
19.70'
R=271.00'
L=19.71'
∆=4°09'58"
S 87°25'04" E
34.56'
R=271.00'
L=34.59'
∆=7°18'44"
N 83°45'28" E
40.13'
R=52.00'
L=41.20'
∆=45°23'49"
S 48°18'26" E 44.34'
L=45.81' ∆=50°28'23"
S 1°04'20" W 42.54'
L=43.82' ∆=48°17'08"
N 5°53'02" W 12.75'
L=12.75' ∆=1°22'50"
C41
S 1°0
4 2' 6" E 119.7
4'
C42
N 88°55'34" E 150.16'
N 88°55'34" E 1,515.55' (1)(2)
BASIS OF BEARINGS
890.24'
S 88°55'34" W 1,109.22'
N
5°5
5'4
6" W 17
3.6 9'
(1)
L
=17
3.9 0' R
=1,0
2 6.0
0' ∆
=
9°4
2'4
0"
N
1 7°28
5' 4" W
1 1
9 6. 5' (1)
3"
LOT 'B'
31,291
S.F.
N 46°04'26" W 43.84'
R=31.00' L=48.69'
∆=90°00'00"
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C32
C33
C34
C35
50.08'
50.08'
45.88'
54.29'
250.00'
250.00'
229.00'
271.00'
11°28'42"
11°28'42"
11°28'42"
11°28'42"
N 85°20'05" W
S 85°20'05" E
S 85°20'05" E
N 85°20'05" W
50.00'
50.00'
45.80'
54.20'
C4 30.53' 550.00' 3°10'49" N 23°22'03" W 30.52'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS DELTA
CHORD
DIRECTION
CHORD
LENGTH
C36
C37
C38
C39
C40
C41
C42
C43
17.21'
34.13'
54.29'
16.98'
1.74'
15.47'
11.43'
33.38'
32.00'
229.00'
271.00'
32.00'
32.00'
32.00'
1,044.00'
229.00'
30°48'22"
8°32'20"
11°28'42"
30°24'31"
3°06'36"
27°41'46"
0°37'39"
8°21'05"
S 76°27'45" W
N 83°51'54" W
S 85°20'05" E
N 10°00'38" E
N 89°41'22" W
S 74°54'27" W
N 17°47'44" W
S 83°46'17" E
17.00'
34.10'
54.20'
16.78'
1.74'
15.32'
11.43'
33.35'
C40
SHEET 9 OF 10
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 40'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 9 OF 10
SEE SHEET 2 FOR BASIS OF BEARINGS, NOTES AND LEGEND
N
24°57'27" W
205.92'
N
01°14'4
0" W
R( )
s 0
6°14 1' 7" W
R( )
N 83°25'33" E (R)
26'
19'
48.0' 3
8'
21' 21'
21' 21'
23' 23'
21'
21'
21' 21'
N 17°01 0' 1" W
R( )
S
0 2°0
3 1' 1" W
R( )
POGONIA STREET
M
LI K
W
E
E
D
WAY
DOG HOBBLE WAY
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
12.5' P.U.E.
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WITH THIS MAP.
RIGHT-OF-WAY
DEDICATED
WITH THIS MAP.
N 71°53'27" E (R)
N
79°08
0' 6" E
R(
)
N
79°12
5' 4" E
R( )
N 85°47'31" E (R)
P.U.E.
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
S
LI VER
SPRUCE
DR
VI E
DETAIL 'A'
SCALE: 1" = 5'
SEE DETAIL 'A'
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
LOT 'B'
11 12 13 14 15 16
58 59
60 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63
61 62
57 21 20 19 18 17 22
23 24
25 26 27 28 29
36 35 34 33 32 31 30 37
38 39
40 41
42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
56 74 75
76 77
78 LOT 'A'
LOT 'C'
LOT 80
LOT 79
LOT 'A'
LOT 'D'
SHEET 10 OF 10
JO
B
N
O. 2
2-0
2-0
0 5
PLAT OF
SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE FD-08 - PHASE 1
SUBDIVISION NO.: PL20-0119
ALL OF LOTS 22 AND 25 OF THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF SIERRA VISTA - FEDERICO" - 'EE' BM 06 LOCATED IN SECTION 35, T. 11 N., R. 5 E., M.D.M.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JULY 2024 SCALE: 1" = 100'
BAKER WILLIAMS ENGINEERING GROUP
SHEET 10 OF 10
VISTA GRANDE BOULEVARD
Informational Sheet Only
THIS SHEET CONTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY PURSUANT TO SECTION 66434.2 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE.
EACH RESIDENTIAL DWELLING CONSTRUCTED ON ANY OF THE LOTS INDICATED HEREON
SHALL BE FITTED WITH A SEWER BACKFLOW VALVE AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OF SAID DWELLING TO MAINTAIN THE VALVE AND PREVENT DAMAGE FROM OCCURRING THERETO. THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE
VALVE, AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE OCCURRING
TO ANY SUCH DWELLING, OR ITS CONTENTS, DUE TO THE FAILURE OF THE VALVE FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER.
Legend:
DENOTES SEWER BACKFLOW PREVENTER VALVE
REQUIRED ON THE SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION BY
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT AND
MAINTAINED THEREAFTER BY THE HOMEOWNER.
DOG HOBBLE WAY
ALUMROOT DRIVE
POGONIA STREET
HEARTLEAF
WAY
SILVER
SPRUCE
DRIVE
WESTBROOK BOULEVARD
BALSAMROOT
DRIVE
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3445
File #: 0401-02-02 & 0400-07
Title: Roseville Old Town Lofts Subdivision - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Robert Medina 916-774-5517 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.16.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept, on behalf of the public, the public utility easements, public drainage easement, emergency vehicle access easement, and pedestrian access easement offered thereon; and
2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section, has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 22 residential lots.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of improvement plans for the Roseville Old Town Lofts project is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the Roseville Old Town Lofts project was accomplished with preparation of the Roseville Old Town Lofts Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND, Adopted: June 13, 2019). Because the Roseville Old Town Lofts project is consistent with the project evaluated in the Roseville Old Town Lofts IS/MND, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Roseville Old Town Lofts IS/MND will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Robert Medina, Assistant Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Vicinity Map
Resolution 24-261
SubdivisionAgreement
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 24-261
APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND C & P DEVELOPMENT LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and C & P Development LLC, for the Roseville Old Town Lofts Subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF
THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF _____________________________) ON _________________________ BEFORE ME, ______________________________, A NOTARY PUBLIC,
PERSONALLY APPEARED
______________________________________________________________, WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE
NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT
HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY
HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
SIGNATURE __________________________________________ NAME(PRINT): __________________________________________ MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN ____________________________ COUNTY MY COMMISSION NO. __________________________________________ COMMISSION EXPIRES: _____________________________________ OWNER'S STATEMENT:
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY STATE THAT THEY ARE THE ONLY PERSONS HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE
INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, AND THEY HEREBY CONSENT TO THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS", AND THEY HEREBY OFFER FOR DEDICATION AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES THE FOLLOWING:
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
A. PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF, BUT NOT LIMITED TO WATER,
GAS AND SANITARY SEWER PIPES, AND TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO; AND FOR UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD WIRES AND CONDUITS FOR
ELECTRIC,TELEPHONE AND TELEVISION SERVICES TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL
APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED “P.U.E." (PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT).
B. PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF UNDERGROUND DRAIN
PIPELINES, TOGETHER WITH ANY AND ALL APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED "P.D.E." (PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT).
C. PUBLIC EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT UPON AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED AS E.V.A.E..
D. PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT UPON AND ACROSS THOSE STRIPS OF LAND SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
A. AS PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THE AREA SHOW HEREON AND DESIGNATED "R.O.W." (RIGHT OF WAY) THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES:
A. PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS UPON AND ACROSS
THOSE AREAS SHOWN HEREON AND DESIGNATED DUBLIN PLACE AND CARLY PLACE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LOT OWNERS AND GUESTS.
B. PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, SERVICES AND
APPURTENANCES PERTAINING THERETO ON, UNDER AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS SHOWN HEREON
AND DESIGNATED AS PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE INDIVIDUAL LOTS SHOWN HEREON.
C. PRIVATE EASEMENTS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS UPON AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS AS SHOWN
HEREON AND DESIGNATED AS PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FOR THE BENEFIT OF INDIVIDUAL LOTS SHOWN HEREON.
C & P DEVELOPMENT LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: _________________________________________ DATE: ________________________ NAME: KARLTON CASTLES, MANAGING MEMBER
BY: _________________________________________ DATE: ________________________ NAME: ROBERT PEGOS, MANAGING MEMBER
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:
THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION
AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF C & P DEVELOPMENT, LLC IN NOVEMBER 2019. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP;
THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND THAT SAID MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED.
DATED: _________________________________
___________________________________________ WILLIAM F. MCKINNEY, PLS 4715 IA
C
I AL
R OF
N
T
OF E TA
S
No. 4715
Exp. 09-30-25
WILLIAM F.
McKINNEY
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT:
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" AND FIND
IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THE TENTATIVE MAP ON FILE AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF; THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATED: _________________________________
___________________________________________ MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE R.C.E. 69879
EXP. DATE 9/30/2024
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
FOR MARC STOUT, CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF ROSEVILLE
DATED: _________________________________
________________________________ TIMOTHY G. BLAIR; P.L.S. 8278 EXP. DATE: 12/31/2025
IA
C
I AL
R OF
N
T
OF E TA
S
No. 8278
Exp. 12-31-25
TIMOTHY G.
BLAIR
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE:
FILED THIS ______ DAY OF ______________________ , AT ___________ _____M. IN BOOK_______ OF MAPS, AT PAGE ________, PLACER COUNTY RECORDS, AT THE REQUEST OF CWE.
FILE NO. 2024-__________________________ RYAN RONCO
PLACER COUNTY RECORDER
FEE: ______________
BY_____________________________________
DEPUTY
CITY CLERK CERTIFICATE:
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE HAS APPROVED THIS FINAL MAP OF "ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" AND HAS ACCEPTED ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDICATION AND HAS ACCEPTED, SUBJECT TO
IMPROVEMENT THE RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS OFFERED HEREON FOR DEDICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THOSE OFFERS.
DATED: ____________________________ ___________________________________________ CITY CLERK, CITY OF ROSEVILLE BY__________________________________________
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
NOTARY'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF
THE INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF _____________________________) ON _________________________ BEFORE ME, ______________________________, A NOTARY PUBLIC,
PERSONALLY APPEARED
______________________________________________________________, WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE
NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT
HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY
HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
SIGNATURE __________________________________________ NAME(PRINT): __________________________________________ MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN ____________________________ COUNTY MY COMMISSION NO. __________________________________________ COMMISSION EXPIRES: _____________________________________ MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: N/A
CWE
SHEET 1 OF 6
DOUGLAS
BOULEVARD NEVADA AVENUE KEEHNER AVENUE
BEN EZRA AVENUE
DONNER AVENUE
SEE SHEET 3
R.O.W.
DEDICATED PER
THIS MAP
1 R.O.W.
DEDICATED PER
THIS MAP
MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: 1"=60'
CWE
SHEET 2 OF 6
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS OF THIS SURVEY
IS BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF NEVADA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON
THE PARCEL MAP FILED FOR RECORD IN
BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 19,
THE BEARING OF WHICH IS N 00°02' 33” E
AND WAS ESTABLISHED FROM RECORD
MONUMENTS FOUND THEREON.
(SEE SHEET 4,5 & 6 FOR EASEMENTS)
BOUNDARY LINE
CENTERLINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
LOT LINE
ADJACENT LOT LINES
EASEMENT LINE AS NOTED
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 5/8" X 18" REBAR CAPPED "LS 4715"
SET 1" BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS 4715"
FLUSH WITH SURFACE
PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
RECORD DATA PER 35 PM 19
RECORD DATA PER 17 PM 135
RECORD DATA PER 20 ROS 24
RECORD DATA PER 16 ROS 46
RECORD DATA PER C MAPS 91
LEGEND:
P.D.E.
E.V.A.E.
P.P.A.E.
(R)
(R1)
(R2)
(R3)
(R4)
DOUGLAS BOULEVARD
NEVADA AVENUE KEEHNER AVENUE
R.O.W.
DEDICATED PER
THIS MAP
3826 SF
9 1221 SF
2 1221 SF
3 1221 SF
4 1221 SF
6 2901 SF
1 1112 SF
10 1112 SF
11 1112 SF
12 1112 SF
13 1112 SF
14 1911 SF
15 5055 SF
16 1469 SF
17 1469 SF
18 1469 SF
19 1468 SF
20 1468 SF
21 2535 SF
22 1141 SF
7 1808 SF
8 1221 SF
5 DUBLIN PLACE
CARLY PLACE
DUBLIN PLACE
MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: 1"=30'
CWE
SHEET 3 OF 6
NOTES:
1. THE EASEMENTS FOR CONTROL OF SLOPE AND
OVERHANG OF POWER LINES PER 688/308 O.R.P.C.
AND PER 688/282 O.R.P.C., LIE WITHIN THE CURRENT
PUBLIC R.O.W. OF DOUGLAS BLVD.
2. SOURCE DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2019
UNDER RECORDER'S DOCUMENT NO. 0219-0104461
AND ALSO RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 2019 UNDER
RECORDER'S DOCUMENT NO. 2019-0104462.
3. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR
"ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS" ARE BEING
RECORDED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH IN
DOCUMENT NO.__________________________O.R.P.C.
4. TOTAL AREA OF THIS SUBDIVISION IS (38,187 SQ.FT.)
(0.877 ACRES) CONSISTING OF 22 LOTS.
5. SEE SHEET 4 FOR DIMENSIONS ON P.P.A.E., P.U.E., &
E.V.A.E.
BOUNDARY LINE
CENTER LINE (℄)
LOT LINES
ADJACENT LOT LINES
ACCESS EASEMENT - SEE NOTE 5
FENCE LINE
....................DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET ....................FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
....................SET 5/8" x 18" REBAR CAPPED "LS 4715" ....................SET 1" BRASS DISK STAMPED "LS 4715"
FLUSH WITH SURFACE
P.U.E ...............PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
E.V.A.E............EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
P.P.A.E............PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
LEGEND:
(SEE SHEETS 4,5 & 6
FOR EASEMENTS)
DOUGLAS BOULEVARD
NEVADA AVENUE KEEHNER AVENUE
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
DUBLIN PLACE
DUBLIN PLACE
CARLY PLACE
MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: 1"=20'
CWE
SHEET 4 OF 6
BOUNDARY LINE
LOT LINE
ADJACENT LOT LINES
EASEMENT LINE AS NOTED
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
LEGEND:
P.D.E.
E.V.A.E.
P.P.A.E.
DOUGLAS BOULEVARD
NEVADA AVENUE KEEHNER AVENUE
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: 1"=20'
CWE
SHEET 5 OF 6
BOUNDARY LINE
LOT LINE
ADJACENT LOT LINES
EASEMENT LINE AS NOTED
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT
LEGEND:
P.D.E.
DOUGLAS BOULEVARD
NEVADA AVENUE KEEHNER AVENUE
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
MAP OF
ROSEVILLE OLD TOWN LOFTS
SUBDIVISION NO. PL 18-0178
PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T.10N., R.6E., M.D.B.&M
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, COUNTY OF PLACER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA JUNE, 2024 SCALE: 1"=20'
CWE
SHEET 6 OF 6
BOUNDARY LINE
LOT LINE
ADJACENT LOT LINES
PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT LINE
DIMENSION POINT, NOTHING FOUND OR SET
LEGEND:
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 3431
File #: 0709-02
Title:
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing - Grant Agreements
Contact: Suzanne Acrell 916-774-5469 [email protected] Meeting Date: 7/17/2024
Item #: 6.17.
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to approve and authorize the City Manager to execute grant agreements between the City of Roseville and ASK (Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Saint Vincent de Paul, Kids First) in the amount of $400,000, Latino Leadership Council in the amount of $35,000, The Gathering Inn in the amount of $80,000, Salvation Army in the amount of $25,000, and Volunteers of America in the amount of $75,000 for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing services.
BACKGROUND
On May 15, 2024, City Council approved the FY24/25 Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing (HPRR) Funding Allocations. These agreements include ASK (Advocates for Mentally Ill Housing, Saint Vincent de Paul, Kids First) in the amount of $400,000, Latino Leadership Council in the amount of $35,000, The Gathering Inn in the amount of $80,000, Salvation Army in the amount of $25,000, and Volunteers of America in the amount of $75,000.
The goals of Roseville’s HPRR program are to provide temporary assistance to prevent an individual or family from losing permanent housing and to provide temporary assistance to homeless individuals and families in obtaining permanent housing. Eligible services for this grant funding include temporary rental assistance, short-term hotel vouchers, housing relocation and stabilization services, housing navigation services, mediation and outreach to property owners, credit repair, security deposits, utility payments, and case management related to these activities.
Supportive case management services allow people to obtain and retain housing. These services are extremely effective in reducing the financial burden and trauma of homelessness.
Grantees are required to submit reporting every six months on specific program outcomes including total residents served and leveraging of funds to ensure efficient delivery of services.
The City continues to work to improve collaboration, efficiency, and outcomes by managing grants with performance-based measurements. Staff continues to see increased collaboration that reaches beyond city grant contracts due to this local policy.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing grant program is funded with $250,000 of Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (Low/Mod funds) and $384,070 in State of California Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funding for the Cities of Roseville and Rocklin. The program significantly reduces instances and durations of homelessness in Roseville and Rocklin and has reduced costs to the Cities and to the community as a whole. The recommended actions do not result in any costs to the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of the Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program grant agreements do not include the potential for a significant environmental effect, and therefore are not subject to CEQA.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Suzanne Acrell, Housing Analyst
Melissa Anguiano, Economic Development Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution 24-247
AMI Housing
Resolution 24-248
Latino Leadership Council
Resolution 24-249
The Gathering Inn
Resolution 24-250
SalvationArmy
Resolution 24-251
Volunteers ofAmerica
RESOLUTION NO. 24-247
APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND AMI HOUSING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and AMI Housing, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/24]
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and AMI Housing, Inc., a California non-profit corporation ("GRANTEE").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to two-hundred and fifty 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024] thousand dollars ($250,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been granted additional funds for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services through the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation program; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied for a grant from these funds in response to CITY’s Notice of Funding Availability; and
WHEREAS, the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Grant Agreement and is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY, after meeting the required obligations and acting in its role as the Housing Successor, desires to grant GRANTEE four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant. CITY hereby authorizes a grant to GRANTEE in the amount of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.
2. Terms of Agreement Prevail. GRANTEE shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Application and this Grant Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of this Grant Agreement and those of the Grant Application, the terms of this Grant Agreement shall prevail.
3. Eligible Services. GRANTEE may only expend the grant on the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services identified in the Grant Application. Grant funds may 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024] only be used to serve households with incomes not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of area median income, as determined by Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. Grant funds may not be used for health or mental health services, food, clothing, emergency shelter, or other services that do not directly assist an individual with avoiding or exiting homelessness. All services shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to CITY’s Economic Development Director.
4. Funds to be Expended During Before June 30, 2025. The grant shall be payable only from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The grant is made only for the time of period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. All funds received by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement shall be spent prior to June 30, 2025. All funds not spent within the current period shall be returned to CITY by July 31, 2025.
No other fund of CITY, including without limitation its general fund, shall be liable for any payment under this Grant Agreement, nor is the taxing power of CITY pledged in any manner.
5. Grantee as Independent Entity. GRANTEE and the agents or employees of GRANTEE in performance of this Grant Agreement shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of CITY.
6. City’s Right to Terminate. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to the GRANTEE should GRANTEE fail to perform the covenants herein contained in the manner herein provided.
7. No Assignment. This Grant Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or part.
8. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Grant Agreement. 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
9. All Terms to be in Writing. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Grant Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties hereto.
10. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as required by the Finance Director of CITY.
GRANTEE agrees to keep records and fully disclose the amount, date, purpose, payee and disposition of the proceeds of the grant; the total cost of the program for which the grant is awarded; and the amount and disposition of that portion of the total cost provided by other sources. The procedure developed by GRANTEE must provide for accurate and timely recordation of the receipt of funds, expenditures, and unexpended balances.
11. Allowability of Expenditures. GRANTEE shall accurately document each transaction to permit the determination, through an audit if requested by CITY, of the accuracy of the records and the allowability of expenditures charged to grant funds. If the allowability of an expenditure cannot be determined because records or documentation are inadequate, the questionable expenditure shall be disallowed. In such case, GRANTEE shall reimburse CITY the amount of any disallowed expenditure. Determination by CITY of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final except in instances of fraud, mistake, or arbitrariness.
12. Maintenance of Records. GRANTEE agrees to maintain fiscal records, including invoices and receipts for a period of three (3) years after termination or expiration of this Grant Agreement and to permit CITY to inspect those records.
5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
13. Audit. CITY may at any time require an audit of GRANTEE's financial and program records.
14. Reports. GRANTEE shall, at such time and in such forms as CITY may require, furnish CITY statements, records, reports, data and information pertaining to matters covered by this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall file a Semi-Annual Report no later than February 1, 2025 and an Annual Report no later than August 1, 2025 containing information related to how the grant funds were expended, the types of services provided, an overview of collaboration efforts with local partners, and a summary of program outcomes required in Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by this reference, including, but not limited to, how many persons retained or obtained housing.
15. Unlawful Discrimination Prohibited. During the performance of this Grant Agreement, GRANTEE shall not deny this Grant Agreement's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, race, color, ethnic group, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected basis nor discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, military status, veteran status, or any other legally protected basis. GRANTEE shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of all employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.
16. Fair Employment. GRANTEE shall comply with the provision of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (2 CCR § 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024] Title 2 of the Government Code (§ 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the State to implement such article.
17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY and all its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of any means, kind or description brought forth on account of fiscal or other injuries to or death of any person including but not limited to workers or the public or damage to property or natural resources resulting from the performance of this Grant Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided by statute. The duty of GRANTEE to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Civil Code § 2778.
GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any types of expressed or implied indemnity against CITY, its officers and employees. GRANTEE warrants that it is fully aware of an expressly waives the protection of Civil Code § 1542. GRANTEE’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Grant Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.
18. Termination by CITY. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement in whole or part upon ten (10) days prior written notice to GRANTEE for any of the following reasons:
A. GRANTEE fails to proceed for whatever reason with the services in the manner set forth in this Grant Agreement.
B. CITY deems this Grant Agreement is not satisfactorily being performed.
C. If any portion of this Grant Agreement is assigned without prior written approval of CITY.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
19. No Waiver of Breach. No waiver of any breach of this Grant Agreement by CITY shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Grant Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Grant Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Grant Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Grant Agreement as a whole.
22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 2024, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087048.DOCX: 5/23/24] EXHIBIT “A”
Grant Application
Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
City of Roseville
Housing Division
2024/25 CDBG and HPRR Funding Application
Deadline: 2/1/2024
AMI Housing, Inc.
A.S.K Rental Assistance Collaboration
Jump to: Pre-Application Questionnaire Funding Application Program/Project Budget Documents USD$ 600,000.00 Requested
USD$ 0 Total cost of the program or
project
Submitted: 1/30/2024 2:22:12 PM
(Pacific)
Project Contact
Jennifer Price
[email protected]
Tel: 530-878-5088
Additional Contacts
[email protected]
AMI Housing, Inc.
P.O. Box 5216
Auburn, CA 95604
CEO
Jennifer Price
[email protected]
Telephone530-878-5088
Fax 916-848-3642
Web www.amihousing.org
EIN 47-0932204
UEI ZCWTMKD2WMF2
SAM
Expires 4/18/2018
Pre-Application Questionnaire top
Primary Applicant
1. Which type of applicant entity are you?
Select one.
2. Have you received any grant funding from the City of Roseville before?
3. Which grant types has your agency received before?
Check all that apply. From any source or agency.
Non-profit (501c3/c4)
Public agency
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit/Public Agency
Other:
Yes
No
Application Summary Description
4. Briefly describe the proposed program or project.
AMIH is applying on behalf of the A.S.K. collaboration between AMI Housing, Kids First, and St. Vincent de Paul and Roseville Housing Authority. The request is for Rapid Rehousing & Homeless Prevention for Roseville and Rocklin residents who are homeless or at risk. This program will provide hotel vouchers, utility payments, first months rent, deposits, supportive services, landlord incentive payments, and short term rental assistance.
Co-Applicant/Collaborating Agency
5. If this is a collaborative application, how many agencies are involved? Tick "0" if this is *not* a collaborative application.
8. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. You will need to know this for your main application.
CDBG
REACH/Citizen’s Benefit Fund/ARPA
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Other homeless funds (McKinney-Vento or other)
Other: Project Based Vouchers
No prior funding
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 more than 6
6. List the collaborating agencies (Enter "none" if none.) Enter agency name and UEI # if assigned
Kids First, St, Vincent de Paul, AMIH and Roseville Housing Authority Kids First, AMIH, Roseville Housing Authority, and St. Vincent de Paul will collaborate for the A.S.K. project.
AMIH UEI #
ZCWTMKD2WMF2
7. Which funding source are you requesting?
Select one
CDBG
HPRR
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
9. Has your agency expended $750,000 or more in federal funds during the most recent fiscal year?
Please note, if federal expenditures exceed $750k, a Single Audit is required.
10. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents. Select "Yes" to confirm.
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
Yes
No
Yes
Funding Application top
1. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one. (BRANCHING CRITERIA) You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. Your selection will determine the questions you are required to complete.
2. Describe the program or project.
What is the service you will provide or the project you will complete? How will it happen and when? What will be the result? Who will benefit and how? What are the goals and objectives? AMIH, SDVP, and KF (ASK) are requesting funding support for the A.S.K program, a collaborative effort which will provide short term rapid rehousing vouchers, homeless prevention assistance, and homeless services to the City of Roseville for individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness.
A.S.K will provide:
• case management
• housing search and placement
• short term/one time housing assistance
• utilities
• hotel vouchers
• application fees
• deposits and incentives to landlords
• household furnishings
• AOD services
• transportation
• Medi-Cal and CalFresh assistance
• mental health, domestic violence, and supportive services Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #1.
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
• credit repair/legal services
The collaborative design will allow us to provide these services to a wide range of clients and effectively cover the demographic scope in Roseville & Rocklin.
Need for homeless services and homeless prevention was determined through participation with the local community and government local homeless studies, and previous point-in-time homeless counts. The 2022 Placer County Point in Time Count noted 323 homeless individuals in the City of Roseville with 195 unsheltered, 109 chronically homeless and 143 who were homeless for the first time. The PIT noted 55 homeless individuals in Rocklin with 48 unsheltered, 16 chronically homeless, and 27 homeless for the first time. The 2023 Placer County Point in Time Count indicated there are still 240 homeless person in Roseville. In addition, we are receiving 300 calls every month for people who are at risk of losing there housing or do not meet HUD's definition of homelessness. It is important to keep funding this program so that the reduction in homelessness continues.
We have a very large chronically homeless and first time homeless population, very high rent prices, and a lack of inventory of affordable housing projects. A.S.K will address these issues by placing people in housing, housing retention, employment services, and case management. Our goal is to keep people housed and to provide housing and support for low-income City of Roseville or Rocklin residents.
3. Location(s) where services will be provided or project will be completed.
Include administrative offices if services will also be provided there or from there. Provide street address, city, and ZIP code.
AMIH: Services will take place at our administrative office located at 3123 Professional Drive Suite 210, Auburn CA 95603 and our Roseville office located at 110 N Sunrise Blvd. Services will also be provided at various apartment complexes and community partners offices. Our Housing Coordinators will meet with clients as needed in the most convenient locations for each participant.
KF: Roseville Office - 124 Main Street Roseville, CA 95678 SVDP: 516 Gibson Drive, Ste 100 Roseville, California 95678
4. What is the program's/project's current status?
Is it still being planned? Is it underway? Is it ready to receive funding? Is the program or project seasonal? What will need to be done before the program or project can start? The proposed A.S.K. project is a continuation of the project implemented in the 2017 round of HPRR funding from the City of Roseville. The partnership continued in 2018, 2019, 2020/2021, 2021/2022, 2022/2023, and 2023/2024 with additional rounds of funding. The agencies have agreed to continue the collaboration in 2024/2025, have outlined a program plan for implementation, and can begin immediately upon funding. The agencies will use existing staff who are already providing these services. This collaboration will allow A.S.K. to maintain their capacity to serve Roseville/Rocklin residents, which we believe has helped decrease the homeless population in Roseville.
5. When will the program or project begin?
If underway as of application, enter “underway.”
Underway
6. When will the program or project be completed?
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year. 6/30/2024
7. What are the specific costs to be funded with this request? Identify the types of costs and amounts. Salary, and for whom? Materials, what type and quantity? Equipment, specifications? How will funding these costs meet the goals and objectives described in this request?
One Time/Short Time Assistance: assistance of approximately $2,000 per household (approximately 3 months) for 142 unduplicated households.
Hotel vouchers: vouchers for approximately 70 nights and 48 unduplicated households.
Application Fees: fees for approximately 60 duplicated households of $175 give or take per household.
Deposits: approximately $1500 per household for 25 unduplicated and 45 duplicated households.
Incentives to landlords: maximum of $1,000 per household, not to exceed $75,000.
Utilities: One time utility assistance of $200 per household for 59 unduplicated and 45 duplicated households.
Case Manager/Housing Coordinator: 2.15 FTE case manager salary and benefits. Case managers are on staff with each organization (no new hires). Will support 2 FTE AMIH, .15 FTE SVDP.
Transportation: mileage reimbursement for case managers assisting individuals with housing search.
Paid at federal mileage rate at approximately 113 miles per week.
Telecommunications: fax, cell phone, and telephone costs for case managers & housing coordinators.
Administration: Up to 10% for agency administration expenses.
Funding these expenditures will allow our agencies to help residents with housing search, placement, and homeless prevention.
8. If this is a collaborative application, describe the collaboration being utilized for the proposed program or project.
Explain how the collaboration improves the provision of services or the competition of the proposed program or project. Attach co-applicant commitment letters to your application to document the collaboration.
The A.S.K agencies have provided housing and/or supportive services for individuals and families in crisis and dealing with homelessness for several decades. Case managers, housing coordinators, peer counselors, and other program staff at our respective agencies have long understood that issues such as domestic violence, mental illness, physical illness, job loss, unavailability of services or ineligibility for services contribute to homelessness. In other situations, financial and housing instability bring underlying issues to a crisis point. A.S.K partners have worked closely with each other for many years to help ensure that individuals and families in the community have access to the human services safety net. However, homelessness, home retention, and housing affordability are still issues for our low-income residents.
AMIH has a team of fifteen Housing Coordinators who will assist each agencies clients with housing search and location. SVDP and KF provide services that support housing retention for at-risk individuals and families. SVDP also provides services for individuals experiencing food insecurity. KF serves clients whose issues may lead to homelessness such as DV, Maternal depression, trauma, ESL, and mental health struggles. In addition, AMIH works in partnership with the Placer County Mobile Crisis Team. Each agency brings a distinctive role to the collaboration and our clients all benefit from the diverse array of services offered.
9. Describe your other collaboration with other agencies, including non-profit and public agencies.
Do you participate in the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and/or coordinated entry efforts? Do you provide/accept referrals? Do you participate in other coordinating bodies or work with service/business/government organizations?
AMIH is a board member of the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and serves on the Executive Board of HRCS, our CoC governing body. AMIH actively participates in coordinated entry (CE) for Placer County and utilizes the Placer "By Name List" to identify the most vulnerable residents in our county who need housing. AMIH provides and receives referrals through CE. In addition, the AMIH housing coordinators outreach to the local homeless shelters and collaborates closely with Roseville police department. All agencies have played a vital role in the Roseville Homelessness Task Force.
A.S.K. has a long history of collaboration with other agencies including: ASOC, Gathering Inn, Welcome Center, Cirby Clubhouse, PIRS, HRCS, PCN, Voc Rehab, Campaign for Community Wellness (CCW), Project Go, VOA, Turning Point, PCOE, SUP, and the cities of Roseville, Rocklin & Auburn.
SVDP provides the BAGS Home Delivery program and partners with Seniors First, ensuring seniors receive either supplemental groceries or prepared meals according to their need.
SVDP has a relationship and accepts referrals from many local churches in Placer County. In 2021, SVDP became a partner with Unite Us, a referral source in the Greater Sacramento Region, allowing referrals coming into Roseville to connect for our 4 main programs - food drive thru distribution, home delivery, meals to go, and rental & utility assistance.
10. Describe your use of volunteers.
How do volunteers contribute to your efforts overall and to this program or project specifically? AMIH/KF has a partnership with CSU, Sacramento & UMass Global to work with students in the social work & mental health BS & MS internship programs. Interns help create & implement individual service plans and visit with our residents at their homes to provide education on basic life skills. Last year additional volunteers helped by gathering and donating household items and by creating welcome bags for residents that include essential items.
KF uses volunteers for the annual Santa Party's to distribute donated gifts to clients and for their "adopt a family" events. Volunteers are also used for the annual golf tournament and other fundraising activities.
SVDP uses volunteers for their BAGS Home deliveries which is a component of their Food Locker. The Food Locker operates with support of over 400 hours of volunteer service monthly. Five days/wk volunteers prepare and serve meals in the SVDP dining room. SVDP volunteers are essential and the program cannot operate without them.
11. Describe your history and experience providing services to the community.
Be sure to include the number of years in operation and summary of major accomplishments.
AMIH: Utilizes funds from EHAPCD, CSBG, CDBG, MHSA, ESG, HEAP, HHAP, HHIP, BFH, HSP, and Homesafe, AMIH has provided housing for homeless adults and families since 2003. Prior to 2003, AMIH operated under NAMI Placer County to provide transitional housing since 1992. In 2015, we housed over 120 individuals and families throughout our housing programs, over 350 in 2016, 550 in 2017, 675 in 2018, 850 in 2019, 887 in 2020, 1167 in 2021, and over 2000 participants in 2022 and 2023. Currently we have 250 permanent housing beds, over 200 rapid re-housing vouchers, 5 emergency housing beds,15 board and care beds, 10-12 former foster youth vouchers, and 37 beds for transitional housing.
KidsFirst was established 30 years ago as a PC Child Abuse Prevention Council with experience providing counseling and family resource services with offices in Roseville and Auburn. KF has a strong case management system with comprehensive programs focused on prevention, intervention and wellness to stabilize and support children and families. We have a robust referral program for basic needs, education, crisis intervention, and counseling.
SDVP: Founded 40 years ago in August, 1983, as a project from Saint Rose Catholic Church in Roseville, CA. SVDP originally started as a small Thrift Store and office, providing free furniture and financial help towards rent and utilities for Roseville residents.
In December 1983, the Dining Room was opened and in January 1984 the Food Locker began operation, serving 200 households monthly.
SVDP has 5 main programs serving South Placer county:
1. Food Locker Drive-thru serving over 225 households weekly
2. St Vincent TO GO Meals serving 300 meals weekly
3. BAGS Home Delivery 85 seniors in Roseville and 85 Rocklin residents
4. Rental & Utility Assistance - ASK collaboration, Rocklin CDBG
5. Smiles Program - School Backpack & Christmas Program
12. Describe your experience with this type of program or project.
If this is a new program or project, your experience with similar programs and projects. If this addresses homelessness, what is your knowledge of issues and needs specific to homeless persons, including families and those at risk of homelessness?
The A.S.K. agencies have provided housing and/or supportive services for individuals and families in crisis and dealing with homelessness for several decades. Case managers, peer counselors, and other program staff at our respective agencies have long understood that issues such as domestic violence, mental illness, physical illness, job loss, unavailability of services or ineligibility for services contribute to homelessness and risk of homelessness. In other situations, financial and housing instability bring underlying issues to a crisis point. A.S.K. partners have worked closely with each other for many years to help ensure that individuals and families in the community have access to the human services safety net.
SVDP and KF provide services that support housing retention for at-risk individuals and families. KF serves clients whose issues may lead to homelessness such as DV, Maternal depression, trauma, ESL, and mental health struggles. AMIH is primarily a housing provider and will utilize their landlord liaison and housing coordination program with 15 housing coordinators to find and identify affordable units in Roseville/Rocklin. In addition, AMIH works in partnership with the Placer County Mobile Crisis Team to provide peer employment and emergency housing for individuals who are having a mental health crisis.
The A.S.K. partnership will enhance a multi-prong approach that addresses homelessness directly as well as its underlying causes.
AMIH is certified in the evidence based "Ready to Rent" practice. Our Housing Coordinators provide these training's on a regular basis to help individuals with poor credit and rental history become better candidates for available housing. We also partner with Northern California Legal Services to provide eviction and credit repair. And lastly for clients with disabilities our SOAR liaison can assist with social security applications that are then fast tracked for approval.
13. Identify staff who will implement and manage the program or project.
Include their experience administering the activity or similar type of activities. If this is a collaborative effort, note the agency for each staff person. Attach resumes and job descriptions or duty statements.
AMIH A.S.K. staff: Housing Coordinators (Amber Haughn, Diana Garcia), Housing Coordination Director (Vanessa Aguilar), Housing Supervisor (Miles Shelly) Data Analyst (Jason Winters), Clinical Director (Raina Thomas), and Jennifer Price (CEO).
SVDP: Will use existing staff for the A.S.K. program including: Bookkeeper (Cheri Alejo), Office Manager (Desiree Orozco), and Executive Director (Rebecca Rush).
KF: Will use existing staff: CEO (Debbie Gabelich), Program Manager (Christina Hernandez), and a variety of Case Managers.
Benefits: By consolidating some program and administrative services, A.S.K. will use funding more efficiently, which will increase the program’s overall capacity. The scope of services provided by the agencies will ensure that the collaboration maximizes engagement with Roseville/Rocklin residents in need of services to improve outcomes. A.S.K. will ensure a warm hand-off of clients being referred to each other.
14. Describe your service area. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents.
HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents.
If you serve an area less than the entire city, explain. If you serve an area larger than the city, how will you identify costs to serve Roseville residents? How will you assure Roseville residents are referred by outside agencies?
All agencies in the A.S.K. collaboration serve the Placer County region and provide services in the City of Roseville & Rocklin. Residency for each participant is verified at program entry and documented on their HMIS intake forms. A.S.K. receives client referrals through partnerships with public and community based human services agencies that serve Roseville residents. We also receive referrals through schools, courts, law enforcement agencies, and other health care providers. In addition, A.S.K. agencies will use the Placer County By Name List through coordinated entry for referrals. A.S.K. reaches out to the community to raise awareness and accessibility.
KF has their main office located in Roseville and increased referrals from local schools, Roseville Utility and local Community Based Organizations. This has been further strengthened with participation in the housing collaborative and further collaborations with other members of that group, serving to assist clients with budgets and Ready-to-Rent programs. KF leverages the countywide collaborations and other inhouse services to build capacity for clients served.
SVDP has their main office located in Roseville, conveniently located to supportive services provided by ASOC and the City of Roseville. SVDP primarily serves the Roseville/Rocklin area.
AMIH has their administrative office in Auburn, but we also have an office at 110 N Sunrise Blvd in Roseville. The AMIH service are is the Placer/Nevada region.
15. List all City of Roseville funding received within the last three (3) years including funding amount and status.
List as follows: PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME, SOURCE/TYPE, AWARD AMOUNT, AWARD DATE, EXPENDED AMOUNT, STATUS (planned, underway, complete, or canceled) 2023/2024: Rapid Rehousing & Homeless Prevention - $500,000 for the ASK program. Source: City of Roseville. Status: Underway.
2023/2024: Temporary rent & utility assistance with supportive services. Source: City of Roseville. $15,000. Status: Underway.
2022/2022: Rapid Rehousing & Homeless Prevention - $500,000 for the ASK program. Source: City of Roseville. Status: Complete.
2022/2023: Temporary rent & utility assistance with supportive services. Source: City of Roseville. $15,000. Status: Complete.
2021/2022/2023: Rental Assistance - $400,500 (CDBG CV). Source: City of Roseville. Status:
Underway.
2021/2022: Rapid Rehousing & Homeless Prevention - $250,000 for the ASK program. Source: City of Roseville. Status: Complete.
2021/2022: Temporary rent & utility assistance with supportive services. Source: City of Roseville. $15,000. Status: Complete..
16. Should the City award less than you have requested, how will this impact the program or project?
Will you accept a lesser amount? Will goals be reduced? Will the program or project not be feasible? If A.S.K. receives less money than requested it will directly impact the number of participants that can be served. The number of individuals receiving short-term housing assistance will need to decrease as well as the amount of deliverable supportive services in proportion to any decrease in funding.
The funding from this application reaches the most vulnerable households in Roseville/Rocklin. This funding is a lifeline and can prevent extremely low income families from becoming homeless. This year we are requesting additional funds to assist KF & SVDP in particular. Each year, they fully expend the funds allocated to them in the first two quarters of the fiscal year. This just identifies how many families in particular are in need of the homeless prevention funding to address high stress situations such as job loss and medical issues.
17. Explain how this program or project offers something different from what other agencies may offer, or are currently offering.
Do you coordinate with other agencies to leverage and avoid duplication? What makes you different? Are services targeted to a unique population? Are you uniquely positioned to serve a community because of location, relationships, or staff skills?
There are currently other agencies providing some rapid rehousing and homeless prevention, but most of the housing money available is for permanent or emergency housing or has been directly tied to COVID relief. This program will differ in that it is a genuine collaborative effort to benefit all low income homeless or at risk in Roseville & Rocklin. The funding will allow participants to retain and preserve their current housing through one time rental or utility assistance. It will also offer short-term rental assistance to lowincome residents who need a leg up to obtain stable housing. This differs from current programs that have strict requirements for people in need of assistance and have limits on the individuals they can serve.
This program also differs from other agencies, in that our clients receive support after they are housed.
The agencies involved often have long term relationships with participants and can continue to offer services utilizing other available funding. In addition, AMIH in particular has more housing coordinators than any other program. The AMIH team spends a significant amount of time on landlord recruitment and we provide weekly email updates on available housing to the nearly 1000 participants on our referral lists.
Housing is in short supply and we are constantly updating our clients on housing that isn't even on the open market yet due to our diligent efforts with landlords.
18. These funds must be used to benefit extremely low, very low, and low and moderate income persons. You must also collect and report demographic information on persons served.
Describe your methods for documenting eligibility for services and collecting demographics.
If you are targeting a low-income area, please describe the area and how you determined it is lowincome. If you are serving a population that is presumed to be low-income, please describe. Describe the tools you use to report on persons served.
AMIH, KF & SVDP will utilize the Homeless Management Information System for all incoming clients. This database will compile all data to comply with reporting requirements.
The intake paperwork captures the following data: demographics, income, income source, homeless status, location, and current housing placement or lack thereof. All participants from these programs will utilize the HMIS intake, update, and exit forms to compile demographic & income information to determine eligibility and to record any updates while enrolled in the A.S.K. program.
19. Are you currently participating in and using HMIS? Are you part of coordinated entry? (HOMELESS)
If not, will you begin using HMIS if awarded funding? Will information on persons served under this award be entered into HMIS?
A.S.K. will use HMIS to count and monitor the participants in this program. AMIH, SVDP, and KF participate in HMIS and will enter their participants into HMIS. AMIH participates directly in Coordinated Entry. See #9 for more information about Coordinated Entry participation.
20. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve THIS year (Jul-Jun)? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
If not underway, enter 0. Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
21. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve NEXT year (Jul-Jun) should you receive this award? How many of those will be Roseville residents? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print. 1000 Total unduplicated persons
1000 Roseville unduplicated persons
2,000.00 TOTAL
1000 Total unduplicated persons
1000 Roseville unduplicated persons
2,000.00 TOTAL
22. What is your total cost to serve each unduplicated person? Amount funded by this grant? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
23. Describe the primary unit of service you will provide.
You will propose numbers in the following question. Examples include: meals, homes repaired, hours of service provided, shelter nights.
Shelter Nights
24. How many units of service (above) do you propose to provide? How many can be attributed to the funding requested?
25. This request will … (SERVICES, FACILITIES, HOMELESS) Select one
26. Describe all planning/predevelopment steps that have been completed to date. (FACILITIES,
ACQUISITION)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
27. Is this project a multi-phased activity? (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
28. Is this a new program/service, or an expansion or continuation of an existing program/service? (SERVICES, HOMELESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
29. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained. (ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
30. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained FOR LOWINCOME PERSONS. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
31. For acquisition of real property or existing property to be used for the development of affordable rental housing - do you have evidence of site control and a current appraisal? (ACQUISITION)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
32. Provide any additional information in the space below that you would like to be considered 1050 Total cost/person ($)
600 Cost/person funded by this grant ($)
1,650.00 TOTAL
60000 Total units
34000 Units attributed to funding requested
94,000.00 TOTAL
Result in an increase in the current level of service provided, or increase the capacity of a facility.
Improve access to an existing service, or improve access to an existing facility.
Prevent a reduction in the current level of service provided, or reduction in the current capacity of a facility.
Correct a currently sub-standard level of service, or correct a sub-standard condition in a facility.
New
Expansion
Continuation
for this proposal.
If none, enter “none.”
The goal of the A.S.K. collaboration was to create a true wraparound care system for residents who are homeless or facing homelessness by addressing issues that contribute to the problem and providing relevant support services that increase housing stability. A.S.K. recognizes the need for increased community collaboration to support the increasing demand for housing services. By bringing these three agencies together we continue reducing the number of homeless in the City of Roseville/Rocklin.
33. Have you completed the budget tab?
34. Have you uploaded all required documents?
Yes
Yes
Program/Project Budget top
Revenue/Sources Prior (Actual) Current
(Budgeted) Proposed
City of Roseville (this request) USD$
500,000.00
USD$
500,000.00 USD$ 600,000.00
ESG Placer COC USD$
100,000.00
USD$
100,000.00 USD$ 50,000.00
Placer County USD$
25,000.00
USD$
25,000.00 USD$ 100,000.00
HHAP USD$
125,000.00
USD$
125,000.00 USD$ 150,000.00
HHIP USD$ 150,000.00
Total USD$
750,000.00
USD$
750,000.00
USD$
1,050,000.00
Expenses/Uses Prior (Actual) Current
(Budgeted) Proposed
One Time/Short Term Rental
Assistance
USD$
390,000.00
USD$
390,000.00 USD$ 500,000.00
Hotel Vouchers USD$
10,500.00
USD$
10,500.00 USD$ 25,000.00
Application Fees USD$
10,500.00
USD$
10,500.00 USD$ 10,500.00
Case Manager Salaries USD$
175,000.00
USD$
175,000.00 USD$ 250,000.00
Deposits USD$
83,000.00
USD$
83,000.00 USD$ 125,000.00
Utilities USD$
20,000.00
USD$
20,000.00 USD$ 40,000.00
Telecommunications USD$ 600.00 USD$ 600.00 USD$ 600.00
Transportation USD$ 5,000.00 USD$ 5,000.00 USD$ 7,500.00 Administration USD$
55,400.00
USD$
55,400.00 USD$ 91,400.00
USD$ 0.00
Total USD$
750,000.00
USD$
750,000.00
USD$
1,050,000.00
Current less Prior USD$ 0.00
Application ID: 457873
Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook
Problems? Contact us at [email protected]
©2002-2024 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved.
"ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC.
Logout | Browser
* ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents.
Change from Prior (Actual) to Current (Budgeted)
Proposed less Current
Change from Current (Budgeted) to Proposed
USD$
300,000.00
Program/Project Budget Narrative
In addition to this request for HPRR funding, this project will be leveraged by A.S.K. agencies as follows:
AMIH: Placer County Housing Coordinator contract, MHSA, ESG, CalWorks RRH, Bringing Families Home, HHAP, HHIP and AMIH general operations funds. These contracts provide funding for services to prevent homelessness, rapidly rehouse or permanently house individuals through vouchers in the community. All funding sources leverage each other and the participant will be placed in the housing program that is most applicable to their need. In addition, AMIH will utilize the services of their 15 other housing coordinators as matching funds ($1,025,000 value).
KF: Will leverage existing agency funds/funding to provide comprehensive support services that will not only help identify and refer for rapid rehousing, but help stabilize and provide resources to the families to avoid/prevent homelessness.
SVDP: Will leverage their food programs, staffing, employment programs, volunteers, and homeless assistance funds.
Documents top
Documents Requested * Required?Attached Documents *
Agency Adopted Budget for current year Agency Budget
Program/Project Proposed Budget
download template
Program Budget
Current Organizational Chart Org Chart
Authorized Signatory Page
download template
Authorized Signatory
Collaborator Commitment Letter(s)
Award Letter(s)
Other documents
RESOLUTION NO. 24-248
APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Latino Leadership Council, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/24]
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Latino Leadership Council, Inc., a California non-profit corporation ("GRANTEE").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to two-hundred and fifty 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024] thousand dollars ($250,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been granted additional funds for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services through the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation program; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied for a grant from these funds in response to CITY’s Notice of Funding Availability; and
WHEREAS, the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Grant Agreement and is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY, after meeting the required obligations and acting in its role as the Housing Successor, desires to grant GRANTEE thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant. CITY hereby authorizes a grant to GRANTEE in the amount of thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.
2. Terms of Agreement Prevail. GRANTEE shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Application and this Grant Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of this Grant Agreement and those of the Grant Application, the terms of this Grant Agreement shall prevail.
3. Eligible Services. GRANTEE may only expend the grant on the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services identified in the Grant Application. Grant funds may 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024] only be used to serve households with incomes not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of area median income, as determined by Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. Grant funds may not be used for health or mental health services, food, clothing, emergency shelter, or other services that do not directly assist an individual with avoiding or exiting homelessness. All services shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to CITY’s Economic Development Director.
4. Funds to be Expended During Before June 30, 2025. The grant shall be payable only from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The grant is made only for the time of period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. All funds received by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement shall be spent prior to June 30, 2025. All funds not spent within the current period shall be returned to CITY by July 31, 2025.
No other fund of CITY, including without limitation its general fund, shall be liable for any payment under this Grant Agreement, nor is the taxing power of CITY pledged in any manner.
5. Grantee as Independent Entity. GRANTEE and the agents or employees of GRANTEE in performance of this Grant Agreement shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of CITY.
6. City’s Right to Terminate. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to the GRANTEE should GRANTEE fail to perform the covenants herein contained in the manner herein provided.
7. No Assignment. This Grant Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or part.
8. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Grant Agreement. 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
9. All Terms to be in Writing. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Grant Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties hereto.
10. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as required by the Finance Director of CITY.
GRANTEE agrees to keep records and fully disclose the amount, date, purpose, payee and disposition of the proceeds of the grant; the total cost of the program for which the grant is awarded; and the amount and disposition of that portion of the total cost provided by other sources. The procedure developed by GRANTEE must provide for accurate and timely recordation of the receipt of funds, expenditures, and unexpended balances.
11. Allowability of Expenditures. GRANTEE shall accurately document each transaction to permit the determination, through an audit if requested by CITY, of the accuracy of the records and the allowability of expenditures charged to grant funds. If the allowability of an expenditure cannot be determined because records or documentation are inadequate, the questionable expenditure shall be disallowed. In such case, GRANTEE shall reimburse CITY the amount of any disallowed expenditure. Determination by CITY of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final except in instances of fraud, mistake, or arbitrariness.
12. Maintenance of Records. GRANTEE agrees to maintain fiscal records, including invoices and receipts for a period of three (3) years after termination or expiration of this Grant Agreement and to permit CITY to inspect those records.
5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
13. Audit. CITY may at any time require an audit of GRANTEE's financial and program records.
14. Reports. GRANTEE shall, at such time and in such forms as CITY may require, furnish CITY statements, records, reports, data and information pertaining to matters covered by this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall file a Semi-Annual Report no later than February 1, 2025 and an Annual Report no later than August 1, 2025 containing information related to how the grant funds were expended, the types of services provided, an overview of collaboration efforts with local partners, and a summary of program outcomes required in Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by this reference, including, but not limited to, how many persons retained or obtained housing.
15. Unlawful Discrimination Prohibited. During the performance of this Grant Agreement, GRANTEE shall not deny this Grant Agreement's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, race, color, ethnic group, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected basis nor discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, military status, veteran status, or any other legally protected basis. GRANTEE shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of all employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.
16. Fair Employment. GRANTEE shall comply with the provision of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (2 CCR § 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024] Title 2 of the Government Code (§ 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the State to implement such article.
17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY and all its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of any means, kind or description brought forth on account of fiscal or other injuries to or death of any person including but not limited to workers or the public or damage to property or natural resources resulting from the performance of this Grant Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided by statute. The duty of GRANTEE to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Civil Code § 2778.
GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any types of expressed or implied indemnity against CITY, its officers and employees. GRANTEE warrants that it is fully aware of an expressly waives the protection of Civil Code § 1542. GRANTEE’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Grant Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.
18. Termination by CITY. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement in whole or part upon ten (10) days prior written notice to GRANTEE for any of the following reasons:
A. GRANTEE fails to proceed for whatever reason with the services in the manner set forth in this Grant Agreement.
B. CITY deems this Grant Agreement is not satisfactorily being performed.
C. If any portion of this Grant Agreement is assigned without prior written approval of CITY.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
19. No Waiver of Breach. No waiver of any breach of this Grant Agreement by CITY shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Grant Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Grant Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Grant Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Grant Agreement as a whole.
22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 2024, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
8 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024] CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a
municipal corporation
BY: ______________________________
DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager
ATTEST:
BY: ______________________________
CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
LATINO LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, a
California non-profit corporation
BY:__________________________
Ernesto Pineda
its: Board President
and
BY:__________________________
Karen Jakovac
APPROVED AS TO FORM: its:CFO
BY: ______________________________
MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
BY: ______________________________
MELISSA ANGUIANO
Economic Development Director
DocuSign Envelope ID: 21B84616-DD4D-4996-9C3A-F5825C4FCFA9 5/30/2024 | 9:15 AM
5/30/2024 | 9:57 AM
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/24] EXHIBIT “A”
Grant Application
Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
City of Roseville
Housing Division
2024/25 CDBG and HPRR Funding Application
Deadline: 2/1/2024
Latino Leadership Council, Inc.
Mi Casa Feliz (My Happy Home)
Jump to: Pre-Application Questionnaire Funding Application Program/Project Budget Documents USD$ 55,000.00 Requested
USD$ 77,025 Total cost of the program or
project
Submitted: 1/31/2024 11:42:19 AM
(Pacific)
Project Contact
Elisa Herrera
[email protected]
Tel: 530-333-3283
Additional Contacts
none entered
Latino Leadership Council, Inc.
110 Harding Blvd Ste C
Roseville, CA 95678
United States
Executive Director
Elisa Herrera
[email protected]
Telephone530-333-3283
Fax
Web www.LatinoLeadershipCouncil.org
EIN 27-0970476
UEI VKYLWMFCPBS9
SAM
Expires
Pre-Application Questionnaire top
Primary Applicant
1. Which type of applicant entity are you?
Select one.
2. Have you received any grant funding from the City of Roseville before?
3. Which grant types has your agency received before?
Check all that apply. From any source or agency.
Non-profit (501c3/c4)
Public agency
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit/Public Agency
Other:
Yes
No
CDBG
REACH/Citizen’s Benefit Fund/ARPA
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Other homeless funds (McKinney-Vento or other)
Other:
Application Summary Description
4. Briefly describe the proposed program or project.
We will work with unserved Latino/a families in the Roseville and Rocklin areas to provide supports that prevents homelessness. Latinos are historically the most vulnerable to evictions due to their legal status. They do not qualify for unemployment, are fearful of legal systems, and often will not or cannot fight any legal proceedings. The LLC is a trusted organization whose team of promotores are already working with these families, so the additional housing funding will be crucial to them.
Co-Applicant/Collaborating Agency
5. If this is a collaborative application, how many agencies are involved? Tick "0" if this is *not* a collaborative application.
6. List the collaborating agencies (Enter "none" if none.) Enter agency name and UEI # if assigned
Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center
7. Which funding source are you requesting?
Select one
8. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. You will need to know this for your main application.
9. Has your agency expended $750,000 or more in federal funds during the most recent fiscal year? Please note, if federal expenditures exceed $750k, a Single Audit is required.
10. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents. Select "Yes" to confirm.
No prior funding
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 more than 6
CDBG
HPRR
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
Yes
No
Yes
Funding Application top
1. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one. (BRANCHING CRITERIA) You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. Your selection will determine the questions you are required to complete.
2. Describe the program or project.
What is the service you will provide or the project you will complete? How will it happen and when? What will be the result? Who will benefit and how? What are the goals and objectives? By December 2024, we will provide homeless prevention support to 25 families in Roseville and Rocklin. Through our existing connections to these vulnerable populations, we will determine eligibility, conduct needs assessments and provide rent funds directly to those landlords whose tenants are at risk of eviction.
The result will be to prevent homelessness among the most vulnerable and marginalized low-income Latino populations who often must make choices between purchasing food, paying rent, or buying medicines for their families. These families are often discriminated against due to their language barriers or documentation, and are often forced to cohabitate with other families in 1-2 bedroom homes, or unsafe or inadequate housing.
Goal: Prevent homelessness among 25 low-income monolingual Spanish-speaking families (approximately 100 individuals total)
Objectives: (1) Conduct home visits among current caseloads and perform outreach to assess other needs for Roseville and Rocklin residents. (2) Assess eligibility and prepare documentation and collect demographic information (3) Provide funding (4) Track funding by zip code / familial unit demographics (5) Submit invoicing and reporting
3. Location(s) where services will be provided or project will be completed.
Include administrative offices if services will also be provided there or from there. Provide street address, city, and ZIP code.
Our Roseville office is an administrative office only and we will not provide services at this location.
Instead, we will continue to conduct home visits during the day, evening and weekend hours, which is necessary to provide service access for working families and to mitigate the transportation and childcare barriers faced by so many of our families.
The Latino Leadership Council is the ONLY Latino-focused organization that works after hours; as such, we often receive referrals from other organizations whose office hours prevent them from meeting families during evenings or weekends.
4. What is the program's/project's current status?
Is it still being planned? Is it underway? Is it ready to receive funding? Is the program or project seasonal? What will need to be done before the program or project can start?
We have the infrastructure in place to launch day 1, as we bring previous experience creating and implementing housing supports.
In 2020 and 2021, through funding by the Placer Community Foundation and private donors, the LLC provided $60,000 in rent support (back rent, deposits) and $25,000 in food for those families who struggled making ends meet during the pandemic.
We set up the infrastructure so that families in need provided basic information, a copy of their rental agreement or other documentation; we then conducted a rapid verification, negotiated rental discounts to prevent evictions, and provided funds directly to landlords to ensure families remained housed, within 2 weeks or less of the request.
5. When will the program or project begin?
If underway as of application, enter “underway.”
Immediately upon receiving funding. (Day 1)
6. When will the program or project be completed?
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year.
Due to the high demand for housing, we anticipate expending funds by December 31, 2024.
7. What are the specific costs to be funded with this request? Identify the types of costs and amounts. Salary, and for whom? Materials, what type and quantity? Equipment, specifications? Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #1.
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
How will funding these costs meet the goals and objectives described in this request? $50,000 Rent, including back rent, security deposits, application fees and current amounts. $5,000 promotores / support staff salaries.
As indicated in our budget, the total program amount would be $77,025; however, we are leveraging our existing grants to cover the majority of the staff time and other admin costs.
8. If this is a collaborative application, describe the collaboration being utilized for the proposed program or project.
Explain how the collaboration improves the provision of services or the competition of the proposed program or project. Attach co-applicant commitment letters to your application to document the collaboration.
The Lighthouse and the LLC have a longstanding collaboration that allows our organizations to share our resources with clients; for instance, because the LLC focuses on Latino populations, if and when the Lighthouse is unable to provide support to a family, they refer to us to conduct home visits, accompany the client to medical appointments, or help complete other paperwork for the clients to ensure they are appropriately served.
Additionally, as the Lighthouse receives donations of diapers, furnishings, clothing, etc., they often reach out and provide these items so our families may also benefit.
We have collaborated on several grants, and leadership from both organizations participate together in committees and other planning activities that benefit our clients.
9. Describe your other collaboration with other agencies, including non-profit and public agencies.
Do you participate in the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and/or coordinated entry efforts? Do you provide/accept referrals? Do you participate in other coordinating bodies or work with service/business/government organizations? The LLC does not participate in COC or coordinated entry, but we have broad collaborations with and receive referrals from numerous nonprofit and public agencies and schools, including Sutter Hospitals (SRMC and SAFH), Kaiser Permanente, Chapa De Indian Health, Placer County CSOC, ASOC and Human Services, and Roseville City School District and Roseville Joint Unified School District. Additionally we receive referrals from 211 Placer and other nonprofit agencies such as AMI Housing, Kids First, Stand Up Placer, Lighthouse FRC, Keaton's Child Cancer Alliance, CalVoices, CASA Placer, the Gathering Inn and Prosper Placer.
Our partnerships with medical professionals, family resource centers, youth development groups, faith-based organizations, corporations, foundations and business communities to create a pool of culturally competent services that are better equipped to serve our underserved Latino populations.
We participate in various committees and leadership boards, including Placer County’s 211 Advisory Committee, Mental Health Services Act Planning Committee and READI (Race Equity Access Diversity and Inclusion), Placer County’s SPEAC Committee (subcommittee to SMART Board), Sacramento Area Council of Government’s (SACOG) Racial Equity and Inclusion Working Group, and Valley Vision’s California Jobs First Leadership Committee. We participate in Roseville Chamber of Commerce events and activities as well as Placer Collaborative Network events and trainings.
10. Describe your use of volunteers.
How do volunteers contribute to your efforts overall and to this program or project specifically? We utilize many volunteers who are bilingual Spanish and can provide interpreting services at our various health fair or parent education events. But due to confidentiality needs of this grant, and because we anticipate that our current caseload can easily incorporate this service for our families, we will not utilize volunteers for this program.
According to promotores, we have an ongoing list of between 5-10 families in dire need of housing supports, and so we anticipate expending the funding fairly quickly through our existing case load.
11. Describe your history and experience providing services to the community.
Be sure to include the number of years in operation and summary of major accomplishments.
The Latino Leadership Council was formed in 2007 to do what other organizations in our region could not or would not do:
advocate specifically on behalf of Latino families, and conduct home visits and coordinate services during evenings and weekends to ensure access by our mostly Spanish-monolingual communities.
We have been providing cultural broker / navigation services to connect our communities to mental health services and supports in Western Placer County. Promotores connect those with mental illness or those at risk of developing mental illnesses to existing supports; and in cases where none exist, we develop partnerships or programs to meet those needs.
Through this funding, we have coordinated several activities that directly educate and engage diverse communities and are key connecting points to provide enrollment activities: Superación Personal and Rincón de las Comadres, which provide empowerment supports, education and mental health connections for adult women; Mis Cuates, a new program for Latino men to discuss health and mental health issues, anxiety, relationship stressors, job-related topics, parenting, etc.; and Parent Project, which is our 16-week weekly program that serves the entire family and improves relationships among parents and their children, many of whom struggle with the demands of two different cultures.
Other organizations providing direct service cannot place priorities on any one community, but rather adapt their services to meet various needs, which often results in gaps in cultural and linguistic competence. The LLC works with the community, partners and service providers to help remove or lessen obstacles Latinos face in accessing services and support.
12. Describe your experience with this type of program or project.
If this is a new program or project, your experience with similar programs and projects. If this addresses homelessness, what is your knowledge of issues and needs specific to homeless persons, including families and those at risk of homelessness? As noted above, the Latino Leadership Council secured housing funds from Placer Community Foundation to support families struggling after the pandemic. Some families who could not work were unable to pay their rents and needed catch-up funding.
The LLC worked through our extensive client networks in addition to partnerships with other nonprofits and public agencies, conducted outreach and needs assessments, and worked with our clients and their landlords to make these payments in a timely manner.
Our organization is nimble, and able to quickly respond to client needs to ensure no one becomes unhoused.
For those Latino clients who have become unhoused, we bring the knowledge, skills and capacity to connect them to a diversity of services and providers that will help them to access services. We pay for housing application fees, support parents in seeking and securing employment, connect the families to schools and social services and provide case management services for all family members.
13. Identify staff who will implement and manage the program or project.
Include their experience administering the activity or similar type of activities. If this is a collaborative effort, note the agency for each staff person. Attach resumes and job descriptions or duty statements.
Our team of 13 promotores have the trust of many clients, and each and every one of them has the knowledge and capacity to perform these services. Our regular Case Managemnet services include home visits, needs assessments for the families, data collection, connection to housing, medical, employment, domestic violence, education, food and other basic needs.
Our process for payments allows all to request these services, and we anticipate that one of our seasoned promotores, Jaime Diaz, would be the lead for the program.
Additional promotores include: Lissett Carrasquel, Yolanda Aceves, Nidia Russi. Support staff preparing reports and tracking data will be Crystal Lopez-Franco.
14. Describe your service area. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents.
If you serve an area less than the entire city, explain. If you serve an area larger than the city, how will you identify costs to serve Roseville residents? How will you assure Roseville residents are referred by outside agencies? The LLC services the western slope of Placer County, with focused areas in Roseville, Auburn, Lincoln, Sheridan, Auburn, and Rocklin.
Our organization regularly performs data collection that includes demographics as well as zip codes and census tracts, and is accustomed to preparing full data and narrative reports that capture stories and impact.We will track incoming referrals and document services as well as outcomes for all clients served through this grant.
Our extensive partnerships noted above demonstrate the trust we have of the community and from collaborative partners. So far in January 2024, we have received 86 referrals from schools, hospitals and other nonprofit organizations for services focused on health access, education, youth development, domestic violence, housing, employment and immigration challenges. We are certain that we will easily meet the referrals for housing supports for this grant.
15. List all City of Roseville funding received within the last three (3) years including funding amount and status.
List as follows: PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME, SOURCE/TYPE, AWARD AMOUNT, AWARD DATE, EXPENDED AMOUNT, STATUS (planned, underway, complete, or canceled)
We have not received any funding from the City of Roseville.
16. Should the City award less than you have requested, how will this impact the program or project? Will you accept a lesser amount? Will goals be reduced? Will the program or project not be feasible? A lesser amount would result in fewer Latino/a families getting rental supports, or simply could result in 25 families receiving fewer dollars to help them remain housed. For instance, rather than one family receiving up to $2,000 to cover rent and deposits, we may only be able to provide $1,000, which could put them at risk of homelessness.
The majority of the request from us is focused on housing funding, as most of our staff time is currently covered by other resources.
17. Explain how this program or project offers something different from what other agencies may offer, or are currently offering.
Do you coordinate with other agencies to leverage and avoid duplication? What makes you different? Are services targeted to a unique population? Are you uniquely positioned to serve a community because of location, relationships, or staff skills? We do not duplicate services, and provide services during the day, evening and weekend hours, which is unlike other agencies or organizations. Also, others providing direct service cannot place priorities on any one community, but rather adapt their services to meet various needs, which often results in gaps in cultural and linguistic competence. The Latino Leadership Council works with the community, partners and service providers to help remove or lessen obstacles Latinos face in accessing services and support.
In both 2010 and 2020, the Latino Leadership Council was the recipient of Placer Community Foundation's Collaborator of the Year Award, demonstrating the broad and consistent reach we have with other partners that help us to better serve our clients. We know that we cannot -- and should not -- do this work alone, and we know that collaboration to serve our Latino community not only results in greater services for our communities, but also provides key capacity building among partners that helps them to learn how to appropriately connect to Latinos.
18. These funds must be used to benefit extremely low, very low, and low and moderate income persons. You must also collect and report demographic information on persons served. Describe your methods for documenting eligibility for services and collecting demographics.
If you are targeting a low-income area, please describe the area and how you determined it is low-income. If you are serving a population that is presumed to be low-income, please describe. Describe the tools you use to report on persons served.
We work with fearful families, some of whom may be illiterate, are monolingual Spanish speaking or speak only Nahuatl, an indigenous dialect from southern Mexico. Most have lived here for many years while some are recent immigrants from Central or South America and nearly all of them work for cash as they are not eligible for employment.
For the past 17 years, the LLC has received grant funding that requires varied levels of documentation, from simple demographic collection, to more extensive household and family data, such as that required by Placer County's MHSA programs and Sutter Hospitals health access grants.
The Latino populations that we intend to serve are in the extremely low income levels, and are often paid via cash, do not have benefits or consistent means of stable incomes, and are frequently living in substandard housing. We are accustomed to collecting the necessary data and our families trust us to do so, knowing that the information will remain safeguarded and only used to participate in programs that benefit their families.
19. Are you currently participating in and using HMIS? Are you part of coordinated entry? (HOMELESS) If not, will you begin using HMIS if awarded funding? Will information on persons served under this award be entered into HMIS?
We are not participating in or using HMIS, nor are we part of coordinated entry, though we are on the Advisory Council for 211 Placer and participate in various homeless counts and housing first initiatives.
We often receive referrals from 211 Placer, the Placer County Adult System of Care, as well as Alliance for Mentally Ill Housing and other agencies providing housing services.
20. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve THIS year (Jul-Jun)? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
If not underway, enter 0. Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
21. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve NEXT year (Jul-Jun) should you receive this award? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
22. What is your total cost to serve each unduplicated person? Amount funded by this grant? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
23. Describe the primary unit of service you will provide. 100 Total unduplicated persons
80 Roseville unduplicated persons
180.00 TOTAL
100 Total unduplicated persons
80 Roseville unduplicated persons
180.00 TOTAL
770.25 Total cost/person ($)
500 Cost/person funded by this grant ($)
1,270.25 TOTAL
You will propose numbers in the following question. Examples include: meals, homes repaired, hours of service provided, shelter nights.
We will provide 25 families (equals 100+ family members) rent or deposit supports
24. How many units of service (above) do you propose to provide? How many can be attributed to the funding requested?
25. This request will … (SERVICES, FACILITIES, HOMELESS) Select one
26. Describe all planning/predevelopment steps that have been completed to date. (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
27. Is this project a multi-phased activity? (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
28. Is this a new program/service, or an expansion or continuation of an existing program/service? (SERVICES,
HOMELESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
29. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
30. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
31. For acquisition of real property or existing property to be used for the development of affordable rental housing - do you have evidence of site control and a current appraisal? (ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
32. Provide any additional information in the space below that you would like to be considered for this proposal.
If none, enter “none.”
This funding will expand housing services to our clients. Without the services of the LLC, many of our families will remain unserved and at risk of being unhoused. Other organizations do great work with their communities, but because they do not have bilingual staff, are often unable to serve this indigent and marginalized community.
We will ensure this very low income population is not overlooked and these underserved families remain housed or have access to safe housing.
33. Have you completed the budget tab?
34. Have you uploaded all required documents?
25 Total units
25 Units attributed to funding requested
50.00 TOTAL
Result in an increase in the current level of service provided, or increase the capacity of a facility.
Improve access to an existing service, or improve access to an existing facility.
Prevent a reduction in the current level of service provided, or reduction in the current capacity of a facility.
Correct a currently sub-standard level of service, or correct a sub-standard condition in a facility.
New
Expansion
Continuation
Yes
Yes
Program/Project Budget top
Revenue/Sources Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed City of Roseville (this request) USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 55,000.00 Placer County MHSA USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 17,025.00
Application ID: 458484
Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook
Problems? Contact us at [email protected]
©2002-2024 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved.
"ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC.
Logout | Browser
* ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents.
Private donors USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 5,000.00
Total USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 77,025.00
Expenses/Uses Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed Salaries USD$ 891,486.00 USD$ 972,733.00 USD$ 14,500.00 Benefits and Taxes USD$ 161,107.00 USD$ 179,692.00 USD$ 5,075.00 Operations USD$ 174,136.00 USD$ 181,497.00 USD$ 2,450.00 Contract Services USD$ 157,224.00 USD$ 182,025.00
Rent supports USD$ 55,000.00
Total USD$ 1,383,953.00 USD$ 1,515,947.00 USD$ 77,025.00 Current less Prior
Change from Prior (Actual) to Current (Budgeted)
USD$ 0.00
Proposed less Current
Change from Current (Budgeted) to Proposed
USD$ 77,025.00
Documents top
Documents Requested * Required?Attached Documents *
Agency Adopted Budget for current year Latino Leadership Council FYE24 Budget Program/Project Proposed Budget
download template
Latino Leadership Council HPRR Budget
Current Organizational Chart Latino Leadership Council Org Chart Authorized Signatory Page
download template
Latino Leadership Council Auth Sig Page
Collaborator Commitment Letter(s) Latino Leadership Council -LighthouseCommitment Award Letter(s)
Other documents Latino Leadership Council Resumes
1 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087069.DOCX: 5/23/2024] EXHIBIT “B”
Performance Measures of Program Outcomes
The City and its grantees will track data on the performance measures as described below. The City will require grantees to collect this information from project participants at program entry and at program exit, or as needed based on timing of submittal of monitoring reports, whichever occurs first. Grantees that do not measure progress or do not make notable progress through the services provided will rank lower or may not be considered for potential future funding rounds.
Grantees must utilize the Homeless Management Information System (“HMIS”) intake, update, and exit forms.
Measurement 1: How many people were served?
• # of people served and demographics
Measurement 2: How many secured housing?
• % and # of people who successfully secure housing, separated into transitional or residential treatment facility and permanent housing
• Cost/benefit ratio (number of clients exited to permanent housing/program cost) • Length of time from program entry to securing permanent housing Measurement 3: What are the long-term benefits? Are there any impacts to other services? Housing:
• % and # of people who retain permanent housing at 6 month intervals from placement in permanent housing or obtain permanent housing after time in transitional or residential treatment
Measurement 4: Please provide narrative information regarding your local partnerships and how you collaborate with other partners and referral agencies to increase service delivery efficiency and decrease service duplication in Roseville and Rocklin.
Measurement 5: Are participants of your program properly entered and updated in the HMIS database?
Use of Funding: A summary report regarding use of the program grant funding will be required with each monitoring report as well, including a final report on the use of funds.
Performance measurements that are unrelated to a given program can be waived at the discretion of City housing staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-249
APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE
GATHERING INN, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and The Gathering Inn, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/24]
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and The Gathering Inn, a California non-profit corporation ("GRANTEE").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to two-hundred and fifty 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024] thousand dollars ($250,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been granted additional funds for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services through the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation program; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied for a grant from these funds in response to CITY’s Notice of Funding Availability; and
WHEREAS, the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Grant Agreement and is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY, after meeting the required obligations and acting in its role as the Housing Successor, desires to grant GRANTEE eighty thousand dollars ($80,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant. CITY hereby authorizes a grant to GRANTEE in the amount of eighty thousand dollars ($80,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.
2. Terms of Agreement Prevail. GRANTEE shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Application and this Grant Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of this Grant Agreement and those of the Grant Application, the terms of this Grant Agreement shall prevail.
3. Eligible Services. GRANTEE may only expend the grant on the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services identified in the Grant Application. Grant funds may 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024] only be used to serve households with incomes not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of area median income, as determined by Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. Grant funds may not be used for health or mental health services, food, clothing, emergency shelter, or other services that do not directly assist an individual with avoiding or exiting homelessness. All services shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to CITY’s Economic Development Director.
4. Funds to be Expended During Before June 30, 2025. The grant shall be payable only from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The grant is made only for the time of period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. All funds received by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement shall be spent prior to June 30, 2025. All funds not spent within the current period shall be returned to CITY by July 31, 2025.
No other fund of CITY, including without limitation its general fund, shall be liable for any payment under this Grant Agreement, nor is the taxing power of CITY pledged in any manner.
5. Grantee as Independent Entity. GRANTEE and the agents or employees of GRANTEE in performance of this Grant Agreement shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of CITY.
6. City’s Right to Terminate. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to the GRANTEE should GRANTEE fail to perform the covenants herein contained in the manner herein provided.
7. No Assignment. This Grant Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or part.
8. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Grant Agreement. 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
9. All Terms to be in Writing. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Grant Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties hereto.
10. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as required by the Finance Director of CITY.
GRANTEE agrees to keep records and fully disclose the amount, date, purpose, payee and disposition of the proceeds of the grant; the total cost of the program for which the grant is awarded; and the amount and disposition of that portion of the total cost provided by other sources. The procedure developed by GRANTEE must provide for accurate and timely recordation of the receipt of funds, expenditures, and unexpended balances.
11. Allowability of Expenditures. GRANTEE shall accurately document each transaction to permit the determination, through an audit if requested by CITY, of the accuracy of the records and the allowability of expenditures charged to grant funds. If the allowability of an expenditure cannot be determined because records or documentation are inadequate, the questionable expenditure shall be disallowed. In such case, GRANTEE shall reimburse CITY the amount of any disallowed expenditure. Determination by CITY of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final except in instances of fraud, mistake, or arbitrariness.
12. Maintenance of Records. GRANTEE agrees to maintain fiscal records, including invoices and receipts for a period of three (3) years after termination or expiration of this Grant Agreement and to permit CITY to inspect those records.
5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
13. Audit. CITY may at any time require an audit of GRANTEE's financial and program records.
14. Reports. GRANTEE shall, at such time and in such forms as CITY may require, furnish CITY statements, records, reports, data and information pertaining to matters covered by this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall file a Semi-Annual Report no later than February 1, 2025 and an Annual Report no later than August 1, 2025 containing information related to how the grant funds were expended, the types of services provided, an overview of collaboration efforts with local partners, and a summary of program outcomes required in Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by this reference, including, but not limited to, how many persons retained or obtained housing.
15. Unlawful Discrimination Prohibited. During the performance of this Grant Agreement, GRANTEE shall not deny this Grant Agreement's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, race, color, ethnic group, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected basis nor discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, military status, veteran status, or any other legally protected basis. GRANTEE shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of all employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.
16. Fair Employment. GRANTEE shall comply with the provision of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (2 CCR § 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024] Title 2 of the Government Code (§ 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the State to implement such article.
17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY and all its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of any means, kind or description brought forth on account of fiscal or other injuries to or death of any person including but not limited to workers or the public or damage to property or natural resources resulting from the performance of this Grant Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided by statute. The duty of GRANTEE to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Civil Code § 2778.
GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any types of expressed or implied indemnity against CITY, its officers and employees. GRANTEE warrants that it is fully aware of an expressly waives the protection of Civil Code § 1542. GRANTEE’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Grant Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.
18. Termination by CITY. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement in whole or part upon ten (10) days prior written notice to GRANTEE for any of the following reasons:
A. GRANTEE fails to proceed for whatever reason with the services in the manner set forth in this Grant Agreement.
B. CITY deems this Grant Agreement is not satisfactorily being performed.
C. If any portion of this Grant Agreement is assigned without prior written approval of CITY.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
19. No Waiver of Breach. No waiver of any breach of this Grant Agreement by CITY shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Grant Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Grant Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Grant Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Grant Agreement as a whole.
22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 2024, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
8 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024] CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a THE GATHERING INN, a
municipal corporation California non-profit corporation BY: ______________________________ BY:__________________________
DOMINICK CASEY
City Manager its:___________________________
ATTEST: and
BY: ______________________________ BY:__________________________
CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk its:___________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: ______________________________
MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:
BY: ______________________________
MELISSA ANGUIANO
Economic Development Director
DocuSign Envelope ID: FD9BEE72-7493-469E-B3BF-D7AE9874D0BB Secretary
President and CEO
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/24] EXHIBIT “A”
Grant Application
Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
City of Roseville
Housing Division
2024/25 CDBG and HPRR Funding Application
Deadline: 2/1/2024
The Gathering Inn
Housing Specialist and RRH
Jump to: Pre-Application Questionnaire Funding Application Program/Project Budget Documents USD$ 151,340.00 Requested
USD$ 151,340 Total cost of the program or project
Submitted: 1/31/2024 11:25:05 AM (Pacific)
Project Contact
Rolande Tellier
[email protected]
Tel: 9166625351
Additional Contacts
[email protected],[email protected]
The Gathering Inn
4020 Sierra College Blvd.
Suite 100
Rocklin, CA 95677
United States
President and CEO
Keith Diederich
[email protected]
Telephone916-791-9355
Fax
Web www.thegatheringinn.com
EIN 84-1657746
UEI JSK9ML95RU75
SAM
Expires
Pre-Application Questionnaire top
Primary Applicant
1. Which type of applicant entity are you?
Select one.
2. Have you received any grant funding from the City of Roseville before?
3. Which grant types has your agency received before?
Check all that apply. From any source or agency.
Non-profit (501c3/c4)
Public agency
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit/Public Agency
Other:
Yes
No
CDBG
REACH/Citizen’s Benefit Fund/ARPA
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Other homeless funds (McKinney-Vento or other)
Other:
No prior funding
Application Summary Description
4. Briefly describe the proposed program or project.
HPRR funding is requested to support a Housing Specialist position that will manage and administer the requested rapid rehousing funds as well as provide case management support to persons formerly experiencing homelessness who have been successfully placed in transitional or permanent supportive housing.
Co-Applicant/Collaborating Agency
5. If this is a collaborative application, how many agencies are involved? Tick "0" if this is *not* a collaborative application.
6. List the collaborating agencies (Enter "none" if none.) Enter agency name and UEI # if assigned
none
7. Which funding source are you requesting?
Select one
8. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. You will need to know this for your main application.
9. Has your agency expended $750,000 or more in federal funds during the most recent fiscal year? Please note, if federal expenditures exceed $750k, a Single Audit is required.
10. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents. Select "Yes" to confirm.
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 more than 6
CDBG
HPRR
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
Yes
No
Yes
Funding Application top
1. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one. (BRANCHING CRITERIA) Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #1.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. Your selection will determine the questions you are required to complete.
2. Describe the program or project.
What is the service you will provide or the project you will complete? How will it happen and when? What will be the result? Who will benefit and how? What are the goals and objectives? HPRR funding is requested to support a Housing Specialist position that will manage and administer rapid rehousing funds as well as provide case management support to persons formerly experiencing homelessness who have been successfully placed in transitional or permanent supportive housing.
We anticipate beginning the position at the start of the 24/25 fiscal year on July 1. This position will serve residents of Roseville who are at risk of homelessness by providing financial assistance in order to remain in their current residence, and will provide support to newly housed residents through periodic communication and access to resources to ensure their success in maintaining their housing.
3. Location(s) where services will be provided or project will be completed.
Include administrative offices if services will also be provided there or from there. Provide street address, city, and ZIP code.
The position will be based out of TGI's South Placer location at 201 Berkeley Ave., Roseville, CA 95678 or TGI's administrative offices at 4020 Sierra College Blvd., Ste. 100, Rocklin, CA 95677.
4. What is the program's/project's current status?
Is it still being planned? Is it underway? Is it ready to receive funding? Is the program or project seasonal? What will need to be done before the program or project can start?
The program is underway and ready to receive funding.
5. When will the program or project begin?
If underway as of application, enter “underway.”
underway
6. When will the program or project be completed?
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year.
June 30, 2025
7. What are the specific costs to be funded with this request? Identify the types of costs and amounts. Salary, and for whom? Materials, what type and quantity? Equipment, specifications? How will funding these costs meet the goals and objectives described in this request? Housing Specialist position: $81,600 (salary, taxes and benefits) Rapid Rehousing funds: $50,000
Indirect Costs: 19,740
8. If this is a collaborative application, describe the collaboration being utilized for the proposed program or project.
Explain how the collaboration improves the provision of services or the competition of the proposed program or project. Attach co-applicant commitment letters to your application to document the collaboration. n/a
9. Describe your other collaboration with other agencies, including non-profit and public agencies.
Do you participate in the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and/or coordinated entry efforts? Do you provide/accept referrals? Do you participate in other coordinating bodies or work with service/business/government organizations? TGI participates in the CoC for Placer County, and holds a position on its board of directors as well as the board of the Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras.
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
TGI staff also leads and participates in the Built for Zero efforts, housing navigation collaboration and multi-agency case conferencing.
TGI has had a long-standing relationship with Placer County HHS, Placer and Roseville Housing Authorities, Placer County Probation, Roseville and Rocklin police, Placer County Sheriff, Sutter Health and Kaiser and numerous church partners.
10. Describe your use of volunteers.
How do volunteers contribute to your efforts overall and to this program or project specifically? Our volunteers demonstrate the heart of The Gathering Inn. They invest their time and talent to impact the lives of our guests, assure them of their value, and encourage their growth. Our South Placer program wouldn't exist without our network of over 20 hosting churches who provide food, shelter & fellowship 365 nights each year. Similarly, our Mid Placer program is upheld by numerous devoted volunteer groups from the community who daily provide and cook dinner for our guests in our 53-foot professional, mobile kitchen. Our dedicated volunteers also assist in our bi-weekly clothing closet, maintenance of our Roseville location and permanent supportive housing, fundraising & daytime resource center. Doctors and nurses donate their time to provide free on-site medical care to guests & low-income community members. All in all, our volunteers nurture friendship, encourage well-being and offer tangible proof that the guests we serve aren’t invisible to the community, but are indeed valued.
11. Describe your history and experience providing services to the community.
Be sure to include the number of years in operation and summary of major accomplishments.
TGI has been in operation since 2004, starting as a winter-only shelter with a small but dedicated group of local churches. We have experienced significant growth over the years, particularly since 2015. Some of TGI's major accomplishments during that time include establishing a Resource Center for day services providing food, showers and access to computers; acquiring and managing permanent supportive housing in various communities in the county; establishing an Interim Care (medical respite) Program in 2009 through a partnership with Sutter Health which provides medical respite for people experiencing homelessness after discharge from a hospital stay; and starting in 2019, operation of the county's only emergency shelter, located in Auburn. In 2023, TGI was awarded contracts to continue operating the emergency shelter as well as assuming responsibility for the mobile temporary shelter, also in Auburn.
12. Describe your experience with this type of program or project.
If this is a new program or project, your experience with similar programs and projects. If this addresses homelessness, what is your knowledge of issues and needs specific to homeless persons, including families and those at risk of homelessness? TGI's mission statement is "to meet people where they are, inspire hope, and walk alongside them on their journey to sustainable housing." TGI exists to serve the needs of people experiencing homelessness and has been operating a nomadic shelter model in South Placer since 2004, a medical respite care program in Auburn since 2009, an emergency congregate shelter in Mid Placer since 2018 and a mobile temporary shelter since 2023.
Both the Mid Placer and South Placer shelter environments are clean and sober as required by our contracts with the County.
The mobile temporary shelter and medical respite programs are low barrier programs where sobriety is not required for admittance.
13. Identify staff who will implement and manage the program or project.
Include their experience administering the activity or similar type of activities. If this is a collaborative effort, note the agency for each staff person. Attach resumes and job descriptions or duty statements.
Nick Golling, Chief Program Officer - provides overall direction to all TGI programs Lindsey DeLaMare, Program Director, South Placer - provides day to day management of all services provided at the Roseville shelter location.
Farrah Beaver and Cheyanne Patterson - Case Managers - provide one on one case plan development and management to guests at the South Placer (Roseville) location.
TBD - Housing Specialist - manages all housing coordination and rapid rehousing activities; manages church partner schedule; develops and fosters landlord relations
14. Describe your service area. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents.
If you serve an area less than the entire city, explain. If you serve an area larger than the city, how will you identify costs to serve Roseville residents? How will you assure Roseville residents are referred by outside agencies? The Gathering Inn serves any man, woman, child or family experiencing homelessness in Placer County. As part of the intake process for all of our guests, we identify their city of residence prior to becoming homeless. In this way, we are able to identify which guests came from Roseville or Rocklin and then track the cost associated with serving those guests. All data pertaining to guests is captured in the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS).
15. List all City of Roseville funding received within the last three (3) years including funding amount and status.
List as follows: PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME, SOURCE/TYPE, AWARD AMOUNT, AWARD DATE, EXPENDED AMOUNT, STATUS (planned, underway, complete, or canceled)
2023/2024-TGI Housing Services and HPRR - $250,000 - underway 2022/2023-TGI Emergency Shelter Program - City of Roseville CDBG $15,000 - Complete 2022/2023- TGI Dental Care - City of Roseville CDBG $15,000 - Complete 2022/2023- TGI Emergency Shelter Program, Office Sound Proofing - City of Roseville CDBG $25,100 - could not spend 2022/2023- TGI Emergency Shelter Program - City of Roseville HPRR $221,000 - Complete 2021/2022 - TGI Emergency Shelter Program - City of Roseville CBT-REACH $27,612 awarded - Complete 2021/2022 - TGI Emergency Shelter Program - City of Roseville CDBG $15,000 awarded - Complete 2021/2022 - TGI Mental Health Clinician - City of Roseville CDBG $15,000 awarded - Complete
16. Should the City award less than you have requested, how will this impact the program or project? Will you accept a lesser amount? Will goals be reduced? Will the program or project not be feasible? We hope The City of Roseville would fully fund our request but TGI would continue providing comprehensive homeless services by identifying alternative sources of income. TGI has always been vigilant about maintaining diversified sources of funding as we are acutely aware that no funding source is guaranteed to continue from one year to the next.
17. Explain how this program or project offers something different from what other agencies may offer, or are currently offering.
Do you coordinate with other agencies to leverage and avoid duplication? What makes you different? Are services targeted to a unique population? Are you uniquely positioned to serve a community because of location, relationships, or staff skills? The Gathering Inn is the largest homeless emergency housing & supportive services provider in Placer County and is the only program that serves all demographics of those experiencing homelessness including men, women & families. No other agency in Placer County provides the breadth of supportive services The Gathering Inn does which include: medical services, clothing closet, laundry & shower services, daytime Resource Center and Service Center, case management, life skills & sobriety programs, on-site Mental Health Clinician support, medical respite and a Permanent Supportive Housing program.
18. These funds must be used to benefit extremely low, very low, and low and moderate income persons. You must also collect and report demographic information on persons served. Describe your methods for documenting eligibility for services and collecting demographics.
If you are targeting a low-income area, please describe the area and how you determined it is low-income. If you are serving a population that is presumed to be low-income, please describe. Describe the tools you use to report on persons served.
TGI performs a detailed intake process with all our homeless guests, and collects a number of data points including: sources of income, amount of income, ethnicity, gender and length of homelessness. This intake process verifies our program participants' low income status. The intake process also provides data regarding our guests' background including; self-reported mental health conditions, whether they have been incarcerated, have been in treatment previously, have an existing medical condition, have a substance abuse problem or have received or are receiving government financial assistance. We would continue to use this system to count & monitor the beneficiaries of our programs. We have been utilizing the HMIS data management system for the past several years and have recently expanded its use to include tracking case management plans, notes & outcomes for our guests. TGI's Director of Quality Assurance is specifically responsible for all guest demographic and statistical reporting and has vastly improved the timeliness, accuracy and efficiency of data collection over the past year.
19. Are you currently participating in and using HMIS? Are you part of coordinated entry? (HOMELESS) If not, will you begin using HMIS if awarded funding? Will information on persons served under this award be entered into HMIS?
We have been utilizing the HMIS data management system for the past several years and have recently expanded its use to include tracking case management plans, notes & outcomes for our guests. Our Director of Data Systems is specifically responsible for all guest demographic and statistical reporting and has vastly improved the timeliness, accuracy and efficiency of data collection over the past year. All referrals for incoming guests and housing referrals are processed through HMIS.
20. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve THIS year (Jul-Jun)? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
If not underway, enter 0. Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
21. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve NEXT year (Jul-Jun) should you receive this award? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print. 646 Total unduplicated persons
266 Roseville unduplicated persons
912.00 TOTAL
22. What is your total cost to serve each unduplicated person? Amount funded by this grant? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
23. Describe the primary unit of service you will provide.
You will propose numbers in the following question. Examples include: meals, homes repaired, hours of service provided, shelter nights.
Number of individuals/families from Roseville or Rocklin receiving rapid rehousing funding
24. How many units of service (above) do you propose to provide? How many can be attributed to the funding requested?
25. This request will … (SERVICES, FACILITIES, HOMELESS) Select one
26. Describe all planning/predevelopment steps that have been completed to date. (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
27. Is this project a multi-phased activity? (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
28. Is this a new program/service, or an expansion or continuation of an existing program/service? (SERVICES,
HOMELESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
29. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
30. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
31. For acquisition of real property or existing property to be used for the development of affordable rental housing - do you have evidence of site control and a current appraisal? (ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
32. Provide any additional information in the space below that you would like to be considered for this proposal.
If none, enter “none.”
None
33. Have you completed the budget tab?
34. Have you uploaded all required documents?
650 Total unduplicated persons
270 Roseville unduplicated persons
920.00 TOTAL
75/day Total cost/person ($)
Cost/person funded by this grant ($)
0.00 TOTAL
45 Total units
15 Units attributed to funding requested
60.00 TOTAL
Result in an increase in the current level of service provided, or increase the capacity of a facility.
Improve access to an existing service, or improve access to an existing facility.
Prevent a reduction in the current level of service provided, or reduction in the current capacity of a facility.
Correct a currently sub-standard level of service, or correct a sub-standard condition in a facility.
New
Expansion
Continuation
Yes
Application ID: 460443
Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook
Problems? Contact us at [email protected]
©2002-2024 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved.
"ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC.
Logout | Browser
* ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents.
Yes
Program/Project Budget top
Revenue/Sources Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed City of Roseville (this request) USD$ 250,000.00 USD$ 151,340.00 USD$ 151,340.00 Total USD$ 250,000.00 USD$ 151,340.00 USD$ 151,340.00
Expenses/Uses Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed Salaries USD$ 68,000.00 USD$ 68,000.00
Benefits USD$ 13,600.00 USD$ 13,600.00
Materials
Equipment
Rent
Utilities
Rapid Rehousing Funds USD$ 50,000.00 USD$ 50,000.00
Indirect Costs USD$ 19,740.00 USD$ 19,740.00
Total USD$ 0.00 USD$ 151,340.00 USD$ 151,340.00
Current less Prior
Change from Prior (Actual) to Current (Budgeted)
USD$ -98,660.00
Proposed less Current
Change from Current (Budgeted) to Proposed
USD$ 0.00
Program/Project Budget Narrative
Funding requested is for:
1 FTE Housing Specialist at $68,000/year plus 20% benefits and taxes $50,000 Rapid Rehousing funds
Indirect costs at 15%, or $19,740
Documents top
Documents Requested * Required?Attached Documents *
Agency Adopted Budget for current year 2024 Agency Budget Program/Project Proposed Budget
download template
TGI grant budget
Current Organizational Chart TGI Org Chart
Authorized Signatory Page
download template
Authorized Signatory
Collaborator Commitment Letter(s)
Award Letter(s)
Other documents
1 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087076.DOCX: 5/23/2024] EXHIBIT “B”
Performance Measures of Program Outcomes
The City and its grantees will track data on the performance measures as described below. The City will require grantees to collect this information from project participants at program entry and at program exit, or as needed based on timing of submittal of monitoring reports, whichever occurs first. Grantees that do not measure progress or do not make notable progress through the services provided will rank lower or may not be considered for potential future funding rounds.
Grantees must utilize the Homeless Management Information System (“HMIS”) intake, update, and exit forms.
Measurement 1: How many people were served?
• # of people served and demographics
Measurement 2: How many secured housing?
• % and # of people who successfully secure housing, separated into transitional or residential treatment facility and permanent housing
• Cost/benefit ratio (number of clients exited to permanent housing/program cost) • Length of time from program entry to securing permanent housing Measurement 3: What are the long-term benefits? Are there any impacts to other services? Housing:
• % and # of people who retain permanent housing at 6 month intervals from placement in permanent housing or obtain permanent housing after time in transitional or residential treatment
Measurement 4: Please provide narrative information regarding your local partnerships and how you collaborate with other partners and referral agencies to increase service delivery efficiency and decrease service duplication in Roseville and Rocklin.
Measurement 5: Are participants of your program properly entered and updated in the HMIS database?
Use of Funding: A summary report regarding use of the program grant funding will be required with each monitoring report as well, including a final report on the use of funds.
Performance measurements that are unrelated to a given program can be waived at the discretion of City housing staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-250
APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THE
SALVATION ARMY, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and The Salvation Army, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/24]
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and The Salvation Army, a California non-profit corporation ("GRANTEE").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to two-hundred and fifty 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024] thousand dollars ($250,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been granted additional funds for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services through the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation program; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied for a grant from these funds in response to CITY’s Notice of Funding Availability; and
WHEREAS, the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Grant Agreement and is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY, after meeting the required obligations and acting in its role as the Housing Successor, desires to grant GRANTEE twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant. CITY hereby authorizes a grant to GRANTEE in the amount of twentyfive thousand dollars ($25,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.
2. Terms of Agreement Prevail. GRANTEE shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Application and this Grant Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of this Grant Agreement and those of the Grant Application, the terms of this Grant Agreement shall prevail.
3. Eligible Services. GRANTEE may only expend the grant on the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services identified in the Grant Application. Grant funds may 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024] only be used to serve households with incomes not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of area median income, as determined by Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. Grant funds may not be used for health or mental health services, food, clothing, emergency shelter, or other services that do not directly assist an individual with avoiding or exiting homelessness. All services shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to CITY’s Economic Development Director.
4. Funds to be Expended During Before June 30, 2025. The grant shall be payable only from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The grant is made only for the time of period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. All funds received by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement shall be spent prior to June 30, 2025. All funds not spent within the current period shall be returned to CITY by July 31, 2025.
No other fund of CITY, including without limitation its general fund, shall be liable for any payment under this Grant Agreement, nor is the taxing power of CITY pledged in any manner.
5. Grantee as Independent Entity. GRANTEE and the agents or employees of GRANTEE in performance of this Grant Agreement shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of CITY.
6. City’s Right to Terminate. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to the GRANTEE should GRANTEE fail to perform the covenants herein contained in the manner herein provided.
7. No Assignment. This Grant Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or part.
8. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Grant Agreement. 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
9. All Terms to be in Writing. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Grant Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties hereto.
10. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as required by the Finance Director of CITY.
GRANTEE agrees to keep records and fully disclose the amount, date, purpose, payee and disposition of the proceeds of the grant; the total cost of the program for which the grant is awarded; and the amount and disposition of that portion of the total cost provided by other sources. The procedure developed by GRANTEE must provide for accurate and timely recordation of the receipt of funds, expenditures, and unexpended balances.
11. Allowability of Expenditures. GRANTEE shall accurately document each transaction to permit the determination, through an audit if requested by CITY, of the accuracy of the records and the allowability of expenditures charged to grant funds. If the allowability of an expenditure cannot be determined because records or documentation are inadequate, the questionable expenditure shall be disallowed. In such case, GRANTEE shall reimburse CITY the amount of any disallowed expenditure. Determination by CITY of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final except in instances of fraud, mistake, or arbitrariness.
12. Maintenance of Records. GRANTEE agrees to maintain fiscal records, including invoices and receipts for a period of three (3) years after termination or expiration of this Grant Agreement and to permit CITY to inspect those records.
5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
13. Audit. CITY may at any time require an audit of GRANTEE's financial and program records.
14. Reports. GRANTEE shall, at such time and in such forms as CITY may require, furnish CITY statements, records, reports, data and information pertaining to matters covered by this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall file a Semi-Annual Report no later than February 1, 2025 and an Annual Report no later than August 1, 2025 containing information related to how the grant funds were expended, the types of services provided, an overview of collaboration efforts with local partners, and a summary of program outcomes required in Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by this reference, including, but not limited to, how many persons retained or obtained housing.
15. Unlawful Discrimination Prohibited. During the performance of this Grant Agreement, GRANTEE shall not deny this Grant Agreement's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, race, color, ethnic group, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected basis nor discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, military status, veteran status, or any other legally protected basis. GRANTEE shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of all employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.
16. Fair Employment. GRANTEE shall comply with the provision of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (2 CCR § 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024] Title 2 of the Government Code (§ 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the State to implement such article.
17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY and all its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of any means, kind or description brought forth on account of fiscal or other injuries to or death of any person including but not limited to workers or the public or damage to property or natural resources resulting from the performance of this Grant Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided by statute. The duty of GRANTEE to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Civil Code § 2778.
GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any types of expressed or implied indemnity against CITY, its officers and employees. GRANTEE warrants that it is fully aware of an expressly waives the protection of Civil Code § 1542. GRANTEE’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Grant Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.
18. Termination by CITY. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement in whole or part upon ten (10) days prior written notice to GRANTEE for any of the following reasons:
A. GRANTEE fails to proceed for whatever reason with the services in the manner set forth in this Grant Agreement.
B. CITY deems this Grant Agreement is not satisfactorily being performed.
C. If any portion of this Grant Agreement is assigned without prior written approval of CITY.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
19. No Waiver of Breach. No waiver of any breach of this Grant Agreement by CITY shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Grant Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Grant Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Grant Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Grant Agreement as a whole.
22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 2024, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/24] EXHIBIT “A”
Grant Application
Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
City of Roseville
Housing Division
2024/25 CDBG and HPRR Funding Application
Deadline: 2/1/2024
The Salvation Army
The Salvation Army-Roseville Corps Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing
Jump to: Pre-Application Questionnaire Funding Application Program/Project Budget Documents USD$ 25,000.00 Requested
USD$ 25,000 Total cost of the program or
project
Submitted: 1/16/2024 1:25:14 PM (Pacific)
Project Contact
Clarissa Ochoa-Oliveira
clarissa.ochoa[email protected]
Tel: 916-436-3786
Additional Contacts
[email protected]
The Salvation Army
100 Lincoln St
Roseville, CA 95678
United States
Corps Officer
Clarissa Ochoa-Oliveira
clarissa.ochoa[email protected]
Telephone916-784-3382
Fax
Web www.roseville.salvationarmy.org
EIN 94-115634
UEI LF19U9DKFQM6
SAM
Expires
Pre-Application Questionnaire top
Primary Applicant
1. Which type of applicant entity are you?
Select one.
2. Have you received any grant funding from the City of Roseville before?
3. Which grant types has your agency received before?
Check all that apply. From any source or agency.
Non-profit (501c3/c4)
Public agency
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit/Public Agency
Other:
Yes
No
CDBG
REACH/Citizen’s Benefit Fund/ARPA
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Application Summary Description
4. Briefly describe the proposed program or project.
We propose to provide help to the community by assisting residents within the Roseville city limits. Our goal is to come along side individuals and families in our community to prevent homelessness due to job loss, unexpected emergency expenses, etc. We will be providing help to those who are currently experiencing homelessness and who are working to obtain permanent housing. Our goal is to also assist those who are at risk of losing utility service due to unforeseen circumstances.
Co-Applicant/Collaborating Agency
5. If this is a collaborative application, how many agencies are involved? Tick "0" if this is *not* a collaborative application.
6. List the collaborating agencies (Enter "none" if none.) Enter agency name and UEI # if assigned
794471367
7. Which funding source are you requesting?
Select one
8. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. You will need to know this for your main application.
9. Has your agency expended $750,000 or more in federal funds during the most recent fiscal year? Please note, if federal expenditures exceed $750k, a Single Audit is required.
10. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents. Select "Yes" to confirm.
Other homeless funds (McKinney-Vento or other)
Other:
No prior funding
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 more than 6
CDBG
HPRR
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
Yes
No
Yes
Funding Application top
1. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one. (BRANCHING CRITERIA) You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. Your selection will determine the questions you are required to complete.
2. Describe the program or project.
What is the service you will provide or the project you will complete? How will it happen and when? What will be the result? Who will benefit and how? What are the goals and objectives? This grant will help us provide rental, deposit, and utility assistance in the City of Roseville and Rocklin. To qualify for rental assistance, clients need to provide the following:
1) A 3-day Pay or Quit Notice
2)An unexpected qualifying expense (ex., auto repair, home repair, medical bill, or loss of employment). 3) Proof of income
For utility assistance, the client must present the following:
1) A Past Due Notice
2) An unexpected expense.
3) Proof of income
For deposit assistance, a client must present the following:
1) An Acceptance Letter from the property manager.
2) Proof of income
Our goal is to reach out to individuals and families in our community to prevent homelessness or interruption of electrical services due to unforeseen emergency expenses and provide assistance to those experiencing homelessness and working to obtain permanent housing. Sometimes the problem isn't a hardship, but rather their money management skills. Clients who show repetitive financial need are provided Finance management classes on top of their service.
3. Location(s) where services will be provided or project will be completed.
Include administrative offices if services will also be provided there or from there. Provide street address, city, and ZIP code.
The Salvation Army- Roseville Corps
100 Lincoln Street
Roseville CA, 95678
4. What is the program's/project's current status?
Is it still being planned? Is it underway? Is it ready to receive funding? Is the program or project seasonal? What will need to be done before the program or project can start?
The Salvation Army HPRR 23/24, CDBG 23/24 and other grants currently fund our assistance programs. This is a year-round program that is ready to receive funding if awarded.
5. When will the program or project begin?
If underway as of application, enter “underway.”
underway
6. When will the program or project be completed?
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year.
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year. This is an ongoing program but all funds will be distributed by the end of June 30 fiscal year.
Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to #1.
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
7. What are the specific costs to be funded with this request? Identify the types of costs and amounts. Salary, and for whom? Materials, what type and quantity? Equipment, specifications? How will funding these costs meet the goals and objectives described in this request? All funding is used for client assistance and is dispersed to clients based on need. Client assistance will be used for rental, deposits and utility assistance.
$15000 Rental and Deposit assistance
$10000Utilities assistance
8. If this is a collaborative application, describe the collaboration being utilized for the proposed program or project.
Explain how the collaboration improves the provision of services or the competition of the proposed program or project. Attach co-applicant commitment letters to your application to document the collaboration.
This is not a collaborative application.
9. Describe your other collaboration with other agencies, including non-profit and public agencies.
Do you participate in the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and/or coordinated entry efforts? Do you provide/accept referrals? Do you participate in other coordinating bodies or work with service/business/government organizations? Our social service staff works with clients to assess individual needs and, if necessary, refer clients to other local agencies such as The Gathering Inn, StandUp Placer, and Kids First. We also receive clients referred to us by other community agencies, schools, churches, etc., who work alongside The Salvation Army to identify families with needs and meet the criteria for support.
10. Describe your use of volunteers.
How do volunteers contribute to your efforts overall and to this program or project specifically? Volunteers work in the social services environment, sorting food donations, preparing food boxes, and serving the community through our food pantry. They also support our Emergency Disaster Services' mobile kitchen. Volunteers augment our kitchen staff to assist with our community meal service. Volunteers help us through their janitorial and facility maintenance work. Our children's programs, TEAMs and Troops, are supported by volunteers. Our volunteer network allows us to reduce staffing costs and direct funding to programs to address the community's needs.
11. Describe your history and experience providing services to the community.
Be sure to include the number of years in operation and summary of major accomplishments.
The Salvation Army has been in existence since 1865. We serve in local communities and provide social services to meet human needs worldwide. The Roseville Corps has assisted residents in this community for over 50 years. In 2020 Forbes rated The Salvation Army as the 4th top-rated charity in the United States. We have a proven record of helping the community with homelessness, Social services, and emergency disaster services.
12. Describe your experience with this type of program or project.
If this is a new program or project, your experience with similar programs and projects. If this addresses homelessness, what is your knowledge of issues and needs specific to homeless persons, including families and those at risk of homelessness? The Salvation Army prioritizes combating homelessness nationwide, which is accomplished through programs and services depending on the community's specific needs. For example, in Roseville, we utilize our services to keep those at risk of losing their residences in their homes.
13. Identify staff who will implement and manage the program or project.
Include their experience administering the activity or similar type of activities. If this is a collaborative effort, note the agency for each staff person. Attach resumes and job descriptions or duty statements.
Captain Clarissa Ochoa-Oliveira- church pastor and administrator for the Salvation Army-Roseville Corps Genelle Jones- Social Services Supervisor; works directly with clients to asses their financial needs and arrange payment of specified funding to payees, as listed on submitted applications. She also maintains client files, managed grant funding, and provides reports of funding use as needed.
Tracie Blevins- Social Services Worker; does initial phone intake with clients searching for assistance and sets interviews, works directly with clients to assess their financial needs. She also maintains client files.
14. Describe your service area. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents.
If you serve an area less than the entire city, explain. If you serve an area larger than the city, how will you identify costs to serve Roseville residents? How will you assure Roseville residents are referred by outside agencies? All clients assisted are City of Roseville or Rocklin residents and are vetted by verifying lease/mortgage statements and utility bills.
15. List all City of Roseville funding received within the last three (3) years including funding amount and status.
List as follows: PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME, SOURCE/TYPE, AWARD AMOUNT, AWARD DATE, EXPENDED AMOUNT, STATUS (planned, underway, complete, or canceled)
2020-The Salvation Army Homeless Prevention, City of Roseville HPRR, $60,000, Complete 2021-The Salvation Army Homeless Prevention, City of Roseville HPRR, $90,000, Complete 2022- The Salvation Army Homeless Prevention City of Roseville HPRR, $60.000, Complete 2023- The Salvation Army Homeless Prevention City of Roseville CDBG, $15,000, In Process 2023- The Salvation Army Homeless Prevention City of Roseville HPRR, $40,000, In Process
16. Should the City award less than you have requested, how will this impact the program or project? Will you accept a lesser amount? Will goals be reduced? Will the program or project not be feasible? We can accept a lesser grant amount. However, it would significantly reduce the number of households we can assist. This grant is a significant source of funding for the Roseville Corps. We have recently seen an increase in the cost of living. This includes rent and utilities. We may need to increase the amounts we are currently issuing to close the financial gap that causes the need for assistance.
17. Explain how this program or project offers something different from what other agencies may offer, or are currently offering.
Do you coordinate with other agencies to leverage and avoid duplication? What makes you different? Are services targeted to a unique population? Are you uniquely positioned to serve a community because of location, relationships, or staff skills? The Salvation Army is centrally located in the downtown Roseville area and is easily landmarked for those unfamiliar with the city.
We currently need to coordinate with other agencies to avoid duplication. We are now considering this as an option to prevent what we label as "double dipping."
Our program is designed to keep people in their homes and prevent them from becoming homeless. Other agencies assist with serving the homeless community, but our sole mission is to keep Roseville and Rocklin residents housed.
18. These funds must be used to benefit extremely low, very low, and low and moderate income persons. You must also collect and report demographic information on persons served. Describe your methods for documenting eligibility for services and collecting demographics.
If you are targeting a low-income area, please describe the area and how you determined it is low-income. If you are serving a population that is presumed to be low-income, please describe. Describe the tools you use to report on persons served.
We use a database program, WellSky, across all The Salvation Army social service programs. It tracks income levels, household size, race/ethnicity and gender. Each client fills out an application and provides documentation that is added to the database. We use the USDA's Income Guidelines when assessing qualifications for assistance.
19. Are you currently participating in and using HMIS? Are you part of coordinated entry? (HOMELESS) If not, will you begin using HMIS if awarded funding? Will information on persons served under this award be entered into HMIS?
Yes, we are currently participating and using HMIS.
20. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve THIS year (Jul-Jun)? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
If not underway, enter 0. Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
21. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve NEXT year (Jul-Jun) should you receive this award? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
22. What is your total cost to serve each unduplicated person? Amount funded by this grant? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print. 200 Total unduplicated persons
125 Roseville unduplicated persons
325.00 TOTAL
200 Total unduplicated persons
125 Roseville unduplicated persons
325.00 TOTAL
1000 Total cost/person ($)
1000 Cost/person funded by this grant ($)
23. Describe the primary unit of service you will provide.
You will propose numbers in the following question. Examples include: meals, homes repaired, hours of service provided, shelter nights.
Rental, Deposit, and Utility assistance
24. How many units of service (above) do you propose to provide? How many can be attributed to the funding requested?
25. This request will … (SERVICES, FACILITIES, HOMELESS) Select one
26. Describe all planning/predevelopment steps that have been completed to date. (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
27. Is this project a multi-phased activity? (FACILITIES, ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
28. Is this a new program/service, or an expansion or continuation of an existing program/service? (SERVICES,
HOMELESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
29. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
30. Enter the number of full-time and part-time jobs that will be created or retained FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS. (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
-answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
31. For acquisition of real property or existing property to be used for the development of affordable rental housing - do you have evidence of site control and a current appraisal? (ACQUISITION) -answer not presented because of the answer to #1-
32. Provide any additional information in the space below that you would like to be considered for this proposal.
If none, enter “none.”
We have had to increase the funding amount per person due to the cost of living increases and the impact of unemployment due to COVID-19, which affected the intervention needed to prevent homelessness. In the past, $750, on average, was sufficient to help clients regain control of their financial obligations. Now that number has increased to $1,000.
33. Have you completed the budget tab?
34. Have you uploaded all required documents?
2,000.00 TOTAL
200 Total units
125 Units attributed to funding requested
325.00 TOTAL
Result in an increase in the current level of service provided, or increase the capacity of a facility.
Improve access to an existing service, or improve access to an existing facility.
Prevent a reduction in the current level of service provided, or reduction in the current capacity of a facility.
Correct a currently sub-standard level of service, or correct a sub-standard condition in a facility.
New
Expansion
Continuation
Yes
Yes
Program/Project Budget top
Revenue/Sources Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed City of Roseville-Rent and Deposit assistance USD$ 15,000.00 Application ID: 460103
Become a fan of ZoomGrants™ on Facebook
Problems? Contact us at [email protected]
©2002-2024 GrantAnalyst.com. All rights reserved.
"ZoomGrants" and the ZoomGrants logo are trademarks of GrantAnalyst.com, LLC.
Logout | Browser
* ZoomGrants™ is not responsible for the content of uploaded documents.
City of Roseville- Utility Assistance USD$ 10,000.00
Total USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 25,000.00
Expenses/Uses Prior (Actual) Current (Budgeted) Proposed Salaries
Benefits
Materials
Equipment
Rent
Utilities
Total USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00 USD$ 0.00
Current less Prior
Change from Prior (Actual) to Current (Budgeted)
USD$ 0.00
Proposed less Current
Change from Current (Budgeted) to Proposed
USD$ 25,000.00
Program/Project Budget Narrative
We are requesting $15000 for Rental and Deposit Assistance and $10000 for Utilities Assistance at our facility Documents top
Documents Requested * Required?Attached Documents *
Agency Adopted Budget for current year Adopted Budget for current Program/Project Proposed Budget
download template
Program/Project Proposed Budget
Current Organizational Chart Organizational Chart
Authorized Signatory Page
download template
Authorized Signatory
Collaborator Commitment Letter(s)
Award Letter(s)
Other documents
1 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087073.DOCX: 5/23/2024] EXHIBIT “B”
Performance Measures of Program Outcomes
The City and its grantees will track data on the performance measures as described below. The City will require grantees to collect this information from project participants at program entry and at program exit, or as needed based on timing of submittal of monitoring reports, whichever occurs first. Grantees that do not measure progress or do not make notable progress through the services provided will rank lower or may not be considered for potential future funding rounds.
Grantees must utilize the Homeless Management Information System (“HMIS”) intake, update, and exit forms.
Measurement 1: How many people were served?
• # of people served and demographics
Measurement 2: How many secured housing?
• % and # of people who successfully secure housing, separated into transitional or residential treatment facility and permanent housing
• Cost/benefit ratio (number of clients exited to permanent housing/program cost) • Length of time from program entry to securing permanent housing Measurement 3: What are the long-term benefits? Are there any impacts to other services? Housing:
• % and # of people who retain permanent housing at 6 month intervals from placement in permanent housing or obtain permanent housing after time in transitional or residential treatment
Measurement 4: Please provide narrative information regarding your local partnerships and how you collaborate with other partners and referral agencies to increase service delivery efficiency and decrease service duplication in Roseville and Rocklin.
Measurement 5: Are participants of your program properly entered and updated in the HMIS database?
Use of Funding: A summary report regarding use of the program grant funding will be required with each monitoring report as well, including a final report on the use of funds.
Performance measurements that are unrelated to a given program can be waived at the discretion of City housing staff.
RESOLUTION NO. 24-251
APPROVING A GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION AND RAPID
REHOUSING SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND NORTHERN NEVADA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Grant Agreement for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Services, by and between the City of Roseville and Volunteers of America Northern California and Northern Nevada, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Grant Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2024, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/24]
GRANT AGREEMENT FOR HOMELESS PREVENTION
AND RAPID REHOUSING SERVICES
THIS GRANT AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ___ day of ___________, 20__, by and between the City of Roseville acting in its role as the Housing Successor, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Volunteers of America Northern California and Northern Nevada, Inc., a California non-profit corporation ("GRANTEE").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34175(b) and the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et al. (53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011)), on February 1, 2012, all assets, properties, contracts, leases, books and records, buildings, and equipment of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Roseville (“RDA”) transferred to the control of the Successor Agency of the RDA (“Successor Agency”) by operation of law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34179.7, the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) issued a finding of completion to the Successor Agency on August 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, funds in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund were subsequently transferred from the Successor Agency to CITY to use in its role as Housing Successor; and
WHEREAS, Section 34176.1(a)(2) of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes Housing Successors, after meeting certain obligations, to expend up to two-hundred and fifty 2 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024] thousand dollars ($250,000) per fiscal year for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services; and
WHEREAS, CITY has been granted additional funds for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services through the Department of Housing and Community Development’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation program; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied for a grant from these funds in response to CITY’s Notice of Funding Availability; and
WHEREAS, the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit “A” to this Grant Agreement and is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, CITY, after meeting the required obligations and acting in its role as the Housing Successor, desires to grant GRANTEE seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Grant. CITY hereby authorizes a grant to GRANTEE in the amount of seventyfive thousand dollars ($75,000) for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services.
2. Terms of Agreement Prevail. GRANTEE shall comply with all the terms and conditions of the Grant Application and this Grant Agreement. In the event of any discrepancy between the terms of this Grant Agreement and those of the Grant Application, the terms of this Grant Agreement shall prevail.
3. Eligible Services. GRANTEE may only expend the grant on the homeless prevention and rapid rehousing services identified in the Grant Application. Grant funds may 3 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024] only be used to serve households with incomes not exceeding thirty percent (30%) of area median income, as determined by Department of Housing and Community Development guidelines. Grant funds may not be used for health or mental health services, food, clothing, emergency shelter, or other services that do not directly assist an individual with avoiding or exiting homelessness. All services shall be performed in a manner satisfactory to CITY’s Economic Development Director.
4. Funds to be Expended During Before June 30, 2025. The grant shall be payable only from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund. The grant is made only for the time of period July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025. All funds received by GRANTEE under this Grant Agreement shall be spent prior to June 30, 2025. All funds not spent within the current period shall be returned to CITY by July 31, 2025.
No other fund of CITY, including without limitation its general fund, shall be liable for any payment under this Grant Agreement, nor is the taxing power of CITY pledged in any manner.
5. Grantee as Independent Entity. GRANTEE and the agents or employees of GRANTEE in performance of this Grant Agreement shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees or agents of CITY.
6. City’s Right to Terminate. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to the GRANTEE should GRANTEE fail to perform the covenants herein contained in the manner herein provided.
7. No Assignment. This Grant Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or part.
8. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Grant Agreement. 4 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
9. All Terms to be in Writing. No alteration or variation of the terms of this Grant Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties hereto.
10. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. GRANTEE agrees to establish and maintain fiscal controls and accounting procedures in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as required by the Finance Director of CITY.
GRANTEE agrees to keep records and fully disclose the amount, date, purpose, payee and disposition of the proceeds of the grant; the total cost of the program for which the grant is awarded; and the amount and disposition of that portion of the total cost provided by other sources. The procedure developed by GRANTEE must provide for accurate and timely recordation of the receipt of funds, expenditures, and unexpended balances.
11. Allowability of Expenditures. GRANTEE shall accurately document each transaction to permit the determination, through an audit if requested by CITY, of the accuracy of the records and the allowability of expenditures charged to grant funds. If the allowability of an expenditure cannot be determined because records or documentation are inadequate, the questionable expenditure shall be disallowed. In such case, GRANTEE shall reimburse CITY the amount of any disallowed expenditure. Determination by CITY of the allowability of any expenditure shall be final except in instances of fraud, mistake, or arbitrariness.
12. Maintenance of Records. GRANTEE agrees to maintain fiscal records, including invoices and receipts for a period of three (3) years after termination or expiration of this Grant Agreement and to permit CITY to inspect those records.
5 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
13. Audit. CITY may at any time require an audit of GRANTEE's financial and program records.
14. Reports. GRANTEE shall, at such time and in such forms as CITY may require, furnish CITY statements, records, reports, data and information pertaining to matters covered by this Grant Agreement. GRANTEE shall file a Semi-Annual Report no later than February 1, 2025 and an Annual Report no later than August 1, 2025 containing information related to how the grant funds were expended, the types of services provided, an overview of collaboration efforts with local partners, and a summary of program outcomes required in Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by this reference, including, but not limited to, how many persons retained or obtained housing.
15. Unlawful Discrimination Prohibited. During the performance of this Grant Agreement, GRANTEE shall not deny this Grant Agreement's benefits to any person on the basis of religion, race, color, ethnic group, ancestry, national origin, sex, age, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, or any other legally protected basis nor discriminate unlawfully against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, military status, veteran status, or any other legally protected basis. GRANTEE shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of all employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination.
16. Fair Employment. GRANTEE shall comply with the provision of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code § 12900, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (2 CCR § 10000, et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, 6 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024] Title 2 of the Government Code (§ 11135-11139.5) and the regulations or standards adopted by the State to implement such article.
17. Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowed by law, GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY and all its officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of any means, kind or description brought forth on account of fiscal or other injuries to or death of any person including but not limited to workers or the public or damage to property or natural resources resulting from the performance of this Grant Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided by statute. The duty of GRANTEE to defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless includes the duties to defend as set forth in Civil Code § 2778.
GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any types of expressed or implied indemnity against CITY, its officers and employees. GRANTEE warrants that it is fully aware of an expressly waives the protection of Civil Code § 1542. GRANTEE’s responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Grant Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law. The parties intend that this provision shall be broadly construed.
18. Termination by CITY. CITY may terminate this Grant Agreement in whole or part upon ten (10) days prior written notice to GRANTEE for any of the following reasons:
A. GRANTEE fails to proceed for whatever reason with the services in the manner set forth in this Grant Agreement.
B. CITY deems this Grant Agreement is not satisfactorily being performed.
C. If any portion of this Grant Agreement is assigned without prior written approval of CITY.
7 [\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/2024]
19. No Waiver of Breach. No waiver of any breach of this Grant Agreement by CITY shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
20. Attorney’s Fees; Venue; Governing Law. If either party commences any legal action against the other party arising out of this Grant Agreement or the performance hereof, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its reasonable litigation expenses, including but not limited to, court costs, expert witness fees, discovery expenses, and attorney’s fees. Any action arising out of this Grant Agreement shall be brought in Placer County, California, regardless of where else venue may lie. This Grant Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
21. Severability. If any of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement are for any reason held invalid or unenforceable, such holding shall not affect the remaining provisions or the validity and enforceability of the Grant Agreement as a whole.
22. Integrated Agreement. This is an integrated agreement and contains all of the terms, considerations, understanding and promises of the parties. It shall be read as a whole.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, has authorized the execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its City Manager and attested to by its City Clerk under the authority of Resolution No. ______, adopted by the Council of the City of Roseville on the ___ day of ____________, 2024, and CONSULTANT has caused this Agreement to be executed.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
[\\Rosenet\rosenetdfs\CITY ATTORNEY\CYCOM\WPDOCS\D022\P006\00087077.DOCX: 5/23/24] EXHIBIT “A”
Grant Application
Powered by ZoomGrants™ and
Email This Preview Save as PDF Print Close Window A▲▼
City of Roseville
Housing Division
2024/25 CDBG and HPRR Funding Application
Deadline: 2/1/2024
Volunteers of America-NCNN
Home Start Family Shelter
Jump to: Pre-Application Questionnaire Funding Application Program/Project Budget Documents USD$ 144,750.00 Requested
USD$ 144,750 Total cost of the program or
project
Submitted: 2/1/2024 12:35:28 PM (Pacific)
Project Contact
Jill Fox
[email protected]
Tel: 916-265-3976
Additional Contacts
none entered
Volunteers of America-NCNN
3434 Marconi Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95821
President/CEO
Christie Holderegger
[email protected]
Telephone 916-265-3976
Fax 916-442-1861
Web www.voa-ncnn.org
EIN 94-6001984
UEI PNW8G83VQVP6
SAM Expires1/14/2021
Pre-Application Questionnaire top
Primary Applicant
1. Which type of applicant entity are you?
Select one.
2. Have you received any grant funding from the City of Roseville before?
3. Which grant types has your agency received before?
Check all that apply. From any source or agency.
Non-profit (501c3/c4)
Public agency
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit
Multi-agency Collaborative – Non-profit/Public Agency
Other:
Yes
No
CDBG
REACH/Citizen’s Benefit Fund/ARPA
Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing
Other homeless funds (McKinney-Vento or other)
Other:
Application Summary Description
4. Briefly describe the proposed program or project.
VOA has designated five housing units on the Home Start Permanent Housing Site to utilize as shelter/room and board beds for families. VOA recognizes the gap in the homeless continuum of care for families who are only offered the nomadic shelter option in Placer County which adds to the existing destabilizing experience for homeless children and the parents who struggle to raise them. Working with these families from the shelter to permanent housing and family stabilization is the goal.
Co-Applicant/Collaborating Agency
5. If this is a collaborative application, how many agencies are involved? Tick "0" if this is *not* a collaborative application.
6. List the collaborating agencies (Enter "none" if none.) Enter agency name and UEI # if assigned
none
7. Which funding source are you requesting?
Select one
8. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one.
You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. You will need to know this for your main application.
9. Has your agency expended $750,000 or more in federal funds during the most recent fiscal year? Please note, if federal expenditures exceed $750k, a Single Audit is required.
10. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents. Select "Yes" to confirm.
No prior funding
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 more than 6
CDBG
HPRR
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
Yes
No
Yes
Funding Application top
Some answers will not be presented because they are not part of the selected group of questions based on the answer to
1. Indicate the type of activity. You may select only one. (BRANCHING CRITERIA) You may submit more than one application. You may submit applications for more than one activity type. If you are not sure which category to select, please consult City staff. Your selection will determine the questions you are required to complete.
2. Describe the program or project.
What is the service you will provide or the project you will complete? How will it happen and when? What will be the result? Who will benefit and how? What are the goals and objectives? Utilizing Home Start for shelter will allow the families to stabilize in place while working on addressing their needs and connecting them with necessary resources. As the family is stabilized, VOA will work with heads of households in meeting housing eligibility requirements, conduct Ready-to-Rent classes and assist in locating and securing stable income and appropriate permanent housing. VOA currently provides a live-in staff who provides emergency response and is available for immediate needs. VOA has hired a Maintenance Technician who will dedicate 5 hrs. per week to the 5 units to insure the units meet HUD quality housing standards and turn over units quickly to maintain 100% occupancy rates. VOA’s supportive services will include case management/ housing assistance and placement /referral/advocacy, financial literacy and practical life skills education, including nutrition and cooking classes, employment assistance, food, and transportation. Connecting families with mainstream resources and assisting them to attain stable housing and income are priorities in every program that VOA operates.
3. Location(s) where services will be provided or project will be completed.
Include administrative offices if services will also be provided there or from there. Provide street address, city, and ZIP code.
Home Start, 410 Riverside Avenue, Roseville, CA 95678
4. What is the program's/project's current status?
Is it still being planned? Is it underway? Is it ready to receive funding? Is the program or project seasonal? What will need to be done before the program or project can start?
The five units of shelters for families in currently operational.
5. When will the program or project begin?
If underway as of application, enter “underway.”
Underway
6. When will the program or project be completed?
Services must be completed no later than June 30 of the award fiscal year.
The shelter operations at Home Start are on-going. We will utilize the funding by the end of the award fiscal year.
7. What are the specific costs to be funded with this request? Identify the types of costs and amounts. Salary, and for whom? Materials, what type and quantity? Equipment, specifications? How will funding these costs meet the goals and objectives described in this request? The specific costs associated with this program are as follows:
Salaries - $64,940 (Case Manager - full time/10% of Program Director) Benefits - $21,430 (33% of salary)
Materials - $600 (office supplies)
Equipment - $3600 (Copy Machine/Computer/Printer)
Rent - $40,320 (5 units @ $672.00 per unit, per month)
Utilities - $3600 ($300.00 monthly)
Supplies - $1200 - includes linens, other replacement items in units Telephone/Internet - $1560 ($130/monthly)
Insurance - $7500 ($625 monthly) property/liability
This funding structure allows VOA to maintain the Home Start Shelter Program for families in a robust/service rich approach.
8. If this is a collaborative application, describe the collaboration being utilized for the proposed program or project.
Explain how the collaboration improves the provision of services or the competition of the proposed program or project. Attach co-applicant commitment letters to your application to document the collaboration. #1.
Public Services (not including services for homeless persons) Public Facilities
Economic Development
Housing (not including housing and shelter for homeless persons) Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing
Other Homeless Services (including shelter)
Acquisition of real property
n/a
9. Describe your other collaboration with other agencies, including non-profit and public agencies.
Do you participate in the local Continuum of Care (CoC) and/or coordinated entry efforts? Do you provide/accept referrals? Do you participate in other coordinating bodies or work with service/business/government organizations? VOA currently participates in the CoC and coordinated entry efforts. We accept referrals through our partners in the community. We work with the City of Roseville and Placer County and VOA has a board member on the HRCS advisory board. VOA acquired the operating of the Home Start Program. A former Home Start board member currently sits on the VOA Board of Directors. VOA works with numerous agency partners, businesses in the area and has proven to be a good resource for many of our community partners.
10. Describe your use of volunteers.
How do volunteers contribute to your efforts overall and to this program or project specifically? Volunteers of America is fortunate to have such amazing volunteers, both on an individual level as well as the community partners that are willing volunteer their time and talent. A prime example of our community partners is CASA. This organization provides amazing on-going support to our families in the shelter. They conduct group workshops as well as support the individual families. We are extremely fortunate to have this on-site collaboration.
11. Describe your history and experience providing services to the community.
Be sure to include the number of years in operation and summary of major accomplishments.
Volunteers of America (VOA) has a long track record of collaboration with colleague agencies. For 113 years, the agency has worked to provide significant services in both the Sacramento and Placer counties through development of and participation in numerous interagency collaborations to provide coordinated, effective systems of care for the clients being served. Specifically in Roseville, VOA has provided assistance and services over the past several decades. We also have established partnerships with in Placer County including Project Go and Placer County System of Care. Additionally, VOA operates several affordable senior properties in Roseville, Rocklin and Auburn. Our Veterans program has also provided case management and rental assistance to veterans in Roseville/Placer County since 2011. Through interagency multi-disciplinary collaborations, VOA has successfully sustained continuums of care for homeless adults moving towards self-sufficiency, chemically dependent pregnant and parenting women and their children seeking recovery, emancipated foster youth seeking education and employment, and homeless mentally ill adults in need of treatment. Building trusting work relationships through honest and respectful communication is the only way to work successfully in this field. Structuring time in which various collaborating agencies meet helps to reinforce positive working relationships, builds in opportunities for staff to engage and interact, as well as provides opportunities to discuss and resolve any challenges. In February 2019, Roseville Home Start Inc (RHS) began its collaboration with the City of Roseville and Volunteers of America Northern California and Northern Nevada (VOA) to continue serving families experiencing homelessness in Placer County, California. VOA and RHS both have a long history of working with the City of Roseville to address homelessness in the community.
12. Describe your experience with this type of program or project.
If this is a new program or project, your experience with similar programs and projects. If this addresses homelessness, what is your knowledge of issues and needs specific to homeless persons, including families and those at risk of homelessness? Volunteers of America is particularly experienced at providing services to people struggling with multiple barriers to independence such as poverty, homelessness, mental illness, substance abuse, HIV/AIDS, and trauma history. Attaining and maintaining stable housing for households is one of the primary objectives in every program that VOA operates. VOA's supportive services include case management, referral and advocacy, financial literacy and practical life skills education, housing assistance, employment assistance, food, transportation and aftercare services. Connecting clients with mainstream resources and assisting them to attain/maintain stable housing are priorities in every program that VOA operates. Staff maintain positive, engaged working relationships with providers of mainstream and private services and work diligently to connect clients. VOA staff conduct weekly housing workshops and assist households to create a housing plan outlining goals for overcoming barriers to housing.
13. Identify staff who will implement and manage the program or project.
Include their experience administering the activity or similar type of activities. If this is a collaborative effort, note the agency for each staff person. Attach resumes and job descriptions or duty statements.
VOA staff for this funding will include Beth Valentine and Pamala Gilliam Beth has worked with the homeless population for almost three decades. She is currently the Program Director at our Home Start program In Roseville. Beth will be overseeing the homeless shelter operations and supervising Pamala Beth will be responsible for the financial portion of the funding. She will provide necessary paperwork for payment to the properties.
Pamala has worked in this field for 10 years. She will provide case management to the shelter clients and work directly with the them and assist them with their housing stability. This includes working with clients on budgeting, accessing mainstream benefits, if eligible and providing other tools and resources to stabilize the household and access other resources as needed.
14. Describe your service area. CDBG funding is intended to benefit City of Roseville residents. HPRR funding is intended to benefit Roseville and Rocklin residents.
If you serve an area less than the entire city, explain. If you serve an area larger than the city, how will you identify costs to serve Roseville residents? How will you assure Roseville residents are referred by outside agencies? The funding will be used for the Home Start Program which is located in city limits of Roseville and serves Roseville families.
Participants in Home Start will be verified as residents of the City of Roseville at the time of entry into the program.
15. List all City of Roseville funding received within the last three (3) years including funding amount and status.
List as follows: PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME, SOURCE/TYPE, AWARD AMOUNT, AWARD DATE, EXPENDED AMOUNT, STATUS (planned, underway, complete, or canceled)
Project Name: HPRR: Home Start Shelter City of Roseville: Award Amount: $64,896.00: Date 7/1/23-6/30/24 - Funds Expended to date: $26,144.57
Project Name: Home Start Playground: City of Roseville/Award Amount: $56,000/Award Date: November 2, 2022 - December 31, 2023 - In progress. Funds not expended - Difficulty with supply chain and construction permit information stalled this project. An extension was requested, but due to the funding source it was not allowed.
Project Name: Home Start Pedestrian Gate Installation: Source: City of Roseville/Award Amount: $8500/Award Date - July 1, 2022-June 30, 2023 - Expended Funds
Project Name: Home Start Kitchen Remodel: Source: CDBG /Award Amount: $104,225,/Award Date: July 1, 2020- June 30, 2021/Expended Amount:$76,019.95 Status: Completed.
Project Name: Rapid Rehousing and Homeless Prevention/Source: City of Roseville/ Award Amount 25,000/ Award Date 21- 22/ Expended Amount:15,000/ Status: Expended
16. Should the City award less than you have requested, how will this impact the program or project? Will you accept a lesser amount? Will goals be reduced? Will the program or project not be feasible? If VOA receives less than the requested amount, we will will adjust the budget and seek other funding sources to stabilize the program. If it is a substantial reduction, we may consider not accepting the grant award. A long-term goal is to acquire consistent, reliable funding for the Home Start Shelter. Our development team continues to research any new opportunities.
17. Explain how this program or project offers something different from what other agencies may offer, or are currently offering.
Do you coordinate with other agencies to leverage and avoid duplication? What makes you different? Are services targeted to a unique population? Are you uniquely positioned to serve a community because of location, relationships, or staff skills? This program is the only permanent shelter for families in Placer County. We currently coordinate with the County of Placer in assisting families at the shelter with access to these resources. These resources include rapid rehousing services and treatment services. We are able to leverage our staff's experience and expertise in assisting these families. We have cultivated excellent partnerships in the community and are often the first called by local partners looking for resources for families in need of assistance in our community. Finally, our staff has the required education and/or experience to understand the needs of our families and provide the individualized services for the families. The staff is trained in client centered approaches such as motivational interviewing and trauma informed care.
18. These funds must be used to benefit extremely low, very low, and low and moderate income persons. You must also collect and report demographic information on persons served. Describe your methods for documenting eligibility for services and collecting demographics.
If you are targeting a low-income area, please describe the area and how you determined it is low-income. If you are serving a population that is presumed to be low-income, please describe. Describe the tools you use to report on persons served.
VOA will work with the clients to determine eligibility. The demographic information will be collected and input into HMIS. VOA will be able to run reports through HMIS to review data.
19. Are you currently participating in and using HMIS? Are you part of coordinated entry? (HOMELESS) If not, will you begin using HMIS if awarded funding? Will information on persons served under this award be entered into HMIS?
VOA is currently participating in both HMIS and coordinated entry.
20. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve THIS year (Jul-Jun)? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
If not underway, enter 0. Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print. 36 Total unduplicated persons
36 Roseville unduplicated persons
72.00 TOTAL
21. How many unduplicated persons are you projecting to serve NEXT year (Jul-Jun) should you receive this award? How many of those will be Roseville residents?
Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.
22. What is your total cost to serve each unduplicated person? Amount funded by this grant? Ignore the automatic total under the table you will see in preview and print.