Roseville City Council
February 19, 2025

decomposed granite paving, asphalt concrete paving, recreational site improvements, etc. are to be protected and preserved.

D. The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to and maintenance of all existing street improvements, drainage facilities and irrigation systems and to re-establish these improvements to their original condition as soon as possible after completion of the work in the area, to the complete satisfaction of the Project Manager and Inspector . Realignments or modifications to the existing facilities as shown on the plans are accepted.

E. Survey monuments and markers either shown on the Plans or encountered during the course of construction shall be protected and preserved. The Contractor shall notify the Inspector upon discovery of an unmarked monument, at which time, arrangements for the relocation or adjustment of the monument will be determined. All costs associated with the relocation or adjustment of these monuments shall be the Contractor’s responsibility.

F. Burning or burying removed material on-site is prohibited.

G. Where the removal of specific material creates an open hole, pit, trench or other depression, the Contractor shall immediately backfill and compact the areas consistent with requirements outlined in Section 31 20 00 of these Specifications.

H. All items identified in the Plans to remain or identified in the field to remain, removed in error by the Contractor, shall be repaired or replaced to match in equal or better construction, at no cost to the City . The quality of the repair or replacement shall be measured as that existing at contract award.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS
Intentionally left blank.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Pre-Construction Site Review
A. Contractor shall review existing site conditions with the Inspector prior to start of construction and document any conditions which adversely affect the satisfactory execution of the work and final acceptance of the project.

B. Commencement of work constitutes acceptance of existing conditions . The Contractor shall, at his expense, be responsible for correcting all unsatisfactory and defective work.

3.02 Clearing
A. Completely remove trees, shrubs, stumps, vines, rubbish/debris, undergrowth, deadwood, structures, and other elements identified to be removed and/or which interfere with the construction as shown on the Plans and as specified.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 31 10 00: Clearing and Grubbing

B. Obtain verification from the Project Manager for non-identified items scheduled to be removed prior to actual removal.

3.03 Grubbing
A. Remove all stumps, roots, grasses and weeds in its entirety . Apply systemic weed killer. Confirm weed kill prior to removal.

B. Once surface material is removed, the Contractor shall stockpile the top twelve inches (12”) of topsoil for use during the final grading phase of work . This soil shall be free of rocks, debris, roots and other undesirable material.

3.04 Utilities
A. Contact USA Alert (800) 642- 2444 prior to commencement of any demolition or excavation work . Provide a minimum of 48 hours’ notice. Verify all utilities entering into and their locations within the project site.

B. Where utilities lie within the project site, but are not a part of the project, the Contractor shall cooperate with the agency or utility company having jurisdiction to maintain its use and the integrity of the structure.

C. Where utilities enter into the project site and taps, connections to or extensions of the utility are identified in the Plans, the Contractor shall coordinate all work with the agency or utility company having jurisdiction to minimize or eliminate disruption of use by the adjacent properties.

D. Verify that all utilities, shown to be removed on the Plans, are inactive and turned off prior to disconnection and/or re-routing, prior to demolition.

3.05 Debris Removal
A. All materials removed as a part of this contract shall become the property of the Contractor and shall be legally disposed of off-site, unless otherwise noted on the Plans.

B. Where a portion of a concrete slab, curb or wall and asphalt concrete paving or curb is to be removed, the concrete shall be cut with a concrete saw at a 90 degree angle so that the edge of the remaining concrete shall form a neat, straight line. Conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

SECTION 31 20 00

EARTHWORK
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

C. The standards set forth in the Caltrans Standard Specifications, latest edition, shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

D. The requirements set forth by CAL OSHA shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Provide all labor, operations and materials necessary for earthwork, including, but not limited to, staking and surveying, grading; excavating; installation of facilities necessary to perform excavation and subsequent removal of such facilities upon completion of work; subgrade preparation; backfilling; and other incidental items necessary for a complete project.

B. This project is a balanced cut and fill project or . The import of material shall be a part of the Contractor’s bid price.

C. The intent of the grading plan is to provide positive drainage and to maintain slopes on walkways as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act and California Title 24 throughout the project site . The Project Manager shall be notified immediately of any discrepancies between the Plans and actual field conditions and/or conflicts between the design and code requirements.

1.03 Related Work
A. Section 31 10 00: Clearing and Grubbing
B. Section 33 00 00: Utilities
C. Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System
D. Section 32 90 00: Planting
E. Section 26 00 00: Site Electrical
F. Section 01 57 23 Storm Water Pollution Control

1.04 Quality Assurance
A. All work shall conform to local codes and regulations, including standards set forth in the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code and ASTM.

B. Relative compaction shall be the in- place dry density of soil denoted as a percentage of the maximum dry density of the same material. This shall be as determined by ASTM 1557. The optimum moisture is measured by the water content which corresponds to the maximum dry density.

C. Upon discovery of unforeseen subsurface site conditions, the Contractor shall notify the Inspector immediately.

D. Upon discovery of hazardous materials, cease all activity and immediately contact the Fire Department.

1.05 Protection
A. Provide and install all supports, shoring, bracing, underpinning, sheet piling and other methods for the sides of excavations necessary for ensuring safe working conditions for the workmen and to protect adjacent improvements to remain.

B. Provide any and all protection measures necessary to ensure the protection of the workmen, the general public, including children and the project site. These protection requirements remain the Contractor’s sole responsibility throughout the duration of the project, including non-working hours.

C. Do not obstruct vehicular, bicycle or pedestrian thoroughfares, unless previously accepted by the City. Provide safe and adequate detours around the construction as required by City and State regulations.

D. Trenches shall be covered at all times when work directly associated with the trenches is not occurring, including non-work hours.

E. During the course of construction, the Contractor shall ensure that surface drainage does not create a nuisance onto adjacent properties.

1.06 Erosion Control Measures
A. Construction sites shall have required erosion and sediment control measures in place as required by the SWPPP . If construction is in progress, the Contractor shall ensure that the construction site is prepared prior to the onset of any storm. At a minimum, erosion control measures shall include:

1. Broadcast seed

2. Drainage area protection

3. Dust/mud control

4. Drain inlet filters

5. Silt fence and straw wattles

6. Slope protection

7. Straw bales

8. Silt controlling devices
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 Base Rock
A. Class 2 aggregate base per Caltrans Standard Specifications, latest edition.

2.02 Drain Rock
A. Drain rock shall be Class 2 permeable, washed, unbroken stone or gravel.

Material gradation shall conform to the following:

Sieve Size Percent Passing
1 inch 100
No. 4 20-50
No. 50 0-10
No. 200 0-5

2.03 Pea Gravel
A. Pea gravel shall be natural stone, free of clay, shale or organic matter, and shall conform to the following:

Sieve Size Percent Passing
3/8 inch 100
No. 4 47
No. 8 2
No. 16 1

2.04 Fill
A. Structural Fill shall conform to Caltrans Standard Specifications or the accepted site-specific geotechnical report generated for the project.

B. Fill for non-structural areas shall conform to the following standards:

1. Plasticity: ASTM D4318-84

2. Expansion Index: No greater than twenty (20)

3. Testing: UBC 29-9 and ASTM D422-72

4. Particle Size: No greater than one inch (1”)

2.05 Topsoil
A. The top eight to ten inches (8” – 10”) of native soil containing more than three percent (3%) organic material. Topsoil shall be free of rocks no larger than one inch (1”) in diameter, free from subsoil, roots, heavy or stiff clay, course sand, destructive seeds, noxious chemicals, brush, debris, litter and other undesirable materials.

B. For any import soil to be used in turf/planting areas, submit a soils analysis with soil amendment recommendations (for plant growth) for review and acceptance prior to placement on-site. Soils test information shall be as outlined in Section 32 90 00: Planting – 1.06.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

2.06 Soil Sterilant
A. Sterilizer shall be standard, quick -acting, short-lived and non- selective weed and grass killer, commonly used under roadway/transportation projects .

Application of the sterilant shall pose no short or long term health threats to the installer or the general public. Submit analysis for approval prior to applying.

2.07 Sand
A. Granular, fine, free of organic matter, mica, loam or clay material.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Construction Staking
A. The layout of all work shall be performed by a California State licensed land surveyor provided by the Contractor.

B. Notify the Inspector immediately of any discrepancies between actual field conditions and the Plans . Minor field adjustments may be necessary in order to fulfill the intent of the Plans.

C. Non-notification of discrepancies between actual field conditions and the Plans by the Contractor, in writing, shall indicate his acceptance of such field conditions. Adjustments/modifications to the construction to accommodate the inconsistencies (without notification) shall be at no additional cost to the City.

3.02 Excavation
A. All excavations shall be as noted on the Plans . Excavations shall include accommodation of base material.

B. Do not over -excavate. Excavations shall provide appropriate space to install shoring, bracing, formwork, etc. , as needed to ensure the safe and proper construction of the work.

C. Take every precaution to prevent water from entering, softening, and undercutting excavated areas, including, pits, footings, trenches, etc.

D. Notify the Inspector immediately upon discovery of unsatisfactory soils materials or unforeseen site conditions. Excavation shall include the complete removal of the unsatisfactory material and its legal disposal thereof.

3.03 Site Grading
A. A grading permit is required to be obtained by the Contractor prior to commencing any earthwork.

B. Grading shall include adjacent transition areas, new elevations/contours as shown on the Plans . All subgrade areas shall be graded parallel to the finish grades and contours and shall be uniform in slope. Transition areas shall provide a smooth connection between new and existing grades and shall not create additional drainage or ponding onto adjoining properties.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

C. Surface grades shall provide for positive drainage away from structures and footings, and shall be uniformly smooth throughout.

D. Rough grading shall:

1. Be graded to a tolerance of 0.10 feet, plus or minus for planted and turf areas.

2. Be graded with a tolerance less than .04’ from specified grade and cross section for subgrade in which pavement, curbs and other structural elements are to be placed immediately above.

3. Provide a subgrade surface free of exposed rocks, stones and boulders.

4. Provide a subgrade surface free of depressions, pits, etc., with proper backfill and compaction. See paragraph 3.04 below.

3.04 Placement of Fill Material
A. Prior to placement of fill material, the Contractor shall:

1. Obtain approval of the subgrade surface from the Inspector.

2. Scarify, dry and compact soft and/or wet areas.

3. Remove and replace unsuitable subgrade material to the satisfaction of the Inspector.

4. Take all necessary corrective action.

B. Do not use topsoil as fill or backfill material, unless otherwise accepted in writing.

C. Fill shall be placed in the following manner:

1. Accepted engineered fill material for structural slabs and areas to be paved shall be placed in six -inch (6”) loose thickness, uniform layers over the entire area.

2. Fill material in planted areas shall be placed in twenty -four inch (24”) maximum loose thickness throughout the areas to receive fill.

D. Aerate or water each lift to obtain the required compaction rate indicated on the Plans. Thoroughly mix material to ensure proper moisture content for compaction. Repeat the operations until grades, as shown on the Plans, are obtained. Jetting of trenches shall be reviewed and accepted by the Inspector prior to performance of work.

E. Do not place fill when the subgrade is frozen, muddy or wet . Allow conditions to thaw and dry out before resuming operations.

F. Use hand tampers or vibrating compactors around foundations walls, retaining walls and other structural elements. Do not use large equipment in these areas and do not begin compaction operations until the bearing surfaces have reached its design strength.

G. Fill around existing trees to remain shall not exceed twelve inches (12”).

1. Minor fill (6” or less) shall utilize topsoil and shall be placed by hand. Do not cover crown of trunk. Feather grades to the extent possible.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

2. Fills between 6” and 12” shall utilize 3/4” pea gravel on grade, placed up to three inches (3”) below finish grade. Apply topsoil, by hand, to meet finish grade elevations. Feather grades to the extent possible.

H. Construct mounds from on-site material. The core of the mound (1’ below finish elevations) shall be compacted to 90% . The top twelve inches (12”) shall be compacted to 85%. Place topsoil in the top twelve inches (12”).

I. Place topsoil in all turf and planting areas a minimum of twelve (12) inches deep.

See Section 31 10 00, 3.03-B: Clearing and Grubbing.

3.05 Trenching, Backfilling and Compacting
A. For trenches greater than five feet (5’) in depth, submit an OSHA permit related to the work.

B. All trenches shall be straight, true and cut vertical at 90 degrees to the surface plane.

C. For trenches through existing paved surfaces, use a concrete saw or other tool to achieve straight, clean lines . Replace paved surface to the same or better condition as existing prior to cut.

D. Do not over-excavate. Maintain bearing surfaces true, level and undisturbed to the extent possible.

E. Trenches shall be kept dry and frost-free. Do not allow standing water to collect.

F. Do not allow trenches to remain exposed at any time when work directly related is not occurring. Cover all trenches during non-work hours.

G. Bedding for all trenches to receive pipes shall be as follows:

1. Bedding material shall be consistent with the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

2. Pipe shall lie completely on bedding . Pipe fittings or joints shall not bear weight.

3. Bedding shall be uniform throughout the length of pipe.

H. Initial backfill for storm drains, sewer lines and electrical conduit shall conform the applicable City standard set forth by the Department having jurisdiction.

I. Backfill beyond the initial operations shall be native soil, placed in twelve- inch (12”) lifts. Compaction for trenched areas shall be 95% for parking lot, driveway and roadway areas; 90% for hardscape (i.e. walkways, picnic pads basketball and tennis courts); and 85% in areas to be planted. Place topsoil over trenches in planted areas . Upon completion, all trenches shall be filled flush with adjacent finish grades.

J. Compaction tests shall be required for trenched areas, hardscape areas and areas where fill over two feet in depth will be placed. The Inspector shall determine the number of tests and the locations . Re-tests shall be the Contractor’s responsibility.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

K. Potholing shall be required in areas where existing utilities are indicated. Hand digging may be required.

3.06 Soil Sterilant
A. Soil sterilant shall be applied to areas where paving is to be installed. The worker applying the sterilant shall take every precaution to avoid overspray of sterilant onto areas to be planted. The sterilant shall be placed no further than six inches (6”) beyond the edge of pavement.

B. Soil sterilant shall not be applied in inclement weather and windy days.

3.07 Drainage Areas
A. All bare areas, regardless of slope, within 50 feet of natural drainages shall be covered with straw and pressed in place.

B. No grading or trenching, except as required for erosion or sediment control, shall occur within 35 feet from the centerline of perennial and intermittent drainage swales between October 5 and April 1 unless approved by the Engineering Division, as well as any other governmental agency which may have additional jurisdiction and/or requirements.

3.08 Dust/Mud Control
A. Adjacent Streets: Adjacent street frontages shall be swept at least once a day to remove silt and other dirt which is evident from construction activities.

B. Construction Vehicles: The Contractor is responsible for cleaning construction vehicles leaving the site on a daily basis to prevent dust, silt, mud and dirt from being released or tracked offsite. Adjacent streets shall be swept clean daily.

C. Grading Spoils: Dry stockpiles of soil shall be watered to prevent the generation of airborne dust. Trucks transporting dry soil shall be covered with tarpaulins.

D. Water: Water shall be sprayed on all exposed earth surfaces during clearing, grading, earth moving and other site preparation activities. The exposed earth shall be watered throughout the day to minimize dust . The Contractor shall obtain a hydrant permit from the Environmental Utilities Department.

E. Wind Allowances: Grading activities shall be restricted or halted when winds exceed 15 miles per hour as deemed necessary by the Public Works Inspector.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 12 16: Asphalt Concrete Paving

SECTION 32 12 16

ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

C. The standards set forth in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards and the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards, latest editions, shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

D. The standards set forth in the State of California, Title 24, Americans with Disabilities Act, latest edition, shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the complete installation of asphalt concrete paving, including international disabled signs as shown in the City Standard, as shown on the Plans and as specified herein.

1.03 References
A. Caltrans Standard Specifications for asphaltic concrete, latest edition.

1.04 Tolerances
A. All surface areas shall drain. Ponding, puddling or birdbaths are not acceptable.

B. Surface grades shall conform to the following:

Description shall not exceed, ... from indicated
line, grade or thickness
Base Course 0.1 foot +/-
Finish Surface 0.05 foot +/-
Thickness of finished
pavement

0.01 foot less
C. Flatness: maximum variance of 1/8” as measured with a ten (10) foot straight edge.

1.05 Testing
A. Testing shall occur during the installation of pavement . The number and frequency of tests shall be as determined by the Inspector.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 12 16: Asphalt Concrete Paving

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 Aggregate Base
A. Conform to Caltrans Standard Specification, Section 26 paragraph 1.02B, Class 2.

2.02 Asphalt Concrete
A. Conform to Caltrans Standard Specification, Section 39 and the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

2.03 Soil Sterilant
A. Sterilizer shall be standard, quick -acting, short-lived and non- selective weed and grass killer, commonly used under roadway/transportation projects .

Application of the sterilant shall pose no short or long term health threats to the installer or the general public. Submit analysis for approval prior to applying.

2.04 Striping
A. Traffic marker paint, in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications, Section 83-3.02.

B. Thermoplastic marking tape in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications, Section 84-2.02. (Required for bike trails)

2.05 Header
A. Per City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards, latest edition.

2.06 Accessible Parking Signs
A. Signs for parking stalls shall conform to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CMUTCD), the Standard Highway Signs manual with the Caltrans California Sign Specifications.

B. Notification sign: Notification sign shall read: “Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated handicapped spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically disabled persons may be towed at owner’s expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at Roseville PD, 1051 Junction Blvd or by telephoning (916) 774-5000. CVC 22511.8”.

C. Sign posts: shall conform to Section 56 Signs in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Preparation
A. Upon completion of grading operations, compact the subgrade at the required elevation to a relative compaction density of 95%, unless otherwise noted on For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 12 16: Asphalt Concrete Paving

the Plans. A load or performance test shall be conducted in the presence of the Inspector prior to the placement of AC.

B. Apply soil sterilant per manufacturer’s directions . Limit the work zone of the sterilant application to the area to receive paving plus three feet (3’) on each side.

C. Completely install redwood header as shown in the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards, latest edition, if shown on the Plans.

D. No material shall be placed in muddy conditions, nor shall any material be placed during or immediately after inclement weather, i.e. rain storms, temperatures below 35 degrees F, etc.

E. In areas where soil conditions are less than optimal, geotechnical tests shall be performed to verify compaction rates . The Inspector shall determine the number of tests necessary in order to verify conditions . Initial tests will be provided by the City. Re-tests shall be the Contractor’s responsibility.

3.02 Installation
A. Spread aggregate base material in six-inch (6”) lifts.

B. Compact base surface to a relative compaction of 95% and in accordance to the Caltrans Standard Specifications, Section 26.

C. Spread asphalt concrete material in accordance to the Caltrans Standard Specifications, Section 39.

D. Upon completion, apply water to the finished surface and allow water to run - off. All areas of ponding, puddling or birdbaths shall be filled with asphalt and fine aggregate. Conform fill surface with adjacent surface to the point edges are not visible.

E. Take every precaution to protect adjacent amenities or structures from material spillage or damage. In case of spillage or damage, the Contractor shall immediately repair or replace the damaged area to the satisfaction of the City.

F. Clean and oil all manhole covers, grates and other surface structures within the pavement area.

G. All new asphalt concrete paving shall receive a fog steal at a rate of 1/12 to 1/10 gallon of undiluted emulsion per square yard. All work shall conform to Caltrans Standard Specifications, Section 37. Once sealed, parking of vehicles and/or equipment or stockpiling of material on the finished surface is prohibited.

H. Clean all surface structures that lie within the asphalt concrete area.

3.03 Striping
A. Conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 12 16: Asphalt Concrete Paving

B. Ensure that all pavement to receive striping is completely cured. Clean all pavement surfaces.

C. Accurately lay out all pavement markings, including, parking stripes, centerline stripes, international disabled parking logo, striping for disabled access ramp, directional arrows, game court lines and other pavement markings as shown on the Plans or as required by code.

D. All pavement lines, striping and lettering shall be four inches (4”) in width, unless otherwise indicated on the Plans.

E. Lines painted with traffic paint shall receive two coats of paint. Allow each coat to dry completely prior to applying the second coat.

F. Apply all pavement markings on clean, dry surfaces, during weather conditions where temperatures are higher than 35 degrees F, no rain is occurring or predicted within the next twenty -four (24) hours, and the humidity is less than

80. G. Remove all excess adhesives and tracking onto unmarked areas.

H. All pavement striping applications shall conform to Caltrans Standard Specifications, Sections 84 and 85.

3.04 Accessible Parking Signs (For parking lots only)
A. Verify that the language on the signs meets with current laws and regulations prior to installation. Immediately notify project manager of discrepancies.

B. For signs at parking stalls: install one per space designated for disabled parking.

Locate sign as shown on the Plans . Verify location in the field prior to installation. Sign bottom shall be set at seven feet (7’) above finished grade.

C. For notification signs: install one per driveway entrance. Verify location in the field prior to installation. Sign bottom shall be set at two feet (2’) above finished grade unless otherwise directed.

D. Sign post installation shall conform to TS-17A of the City of Roseville Development Services Design and Construction Standards.

3.05 Protection and Cleaning
A. Do not allow equipment or vehicles to park on new asphalt surfaces upon completion of fog seal operations . At his discretion, the Contractor may allow the parking of equipment and vehicles on the asphalt concrete AFTER the asphalt concrete material has been laid, passing applicable compaction tests and PRIOR TO applications of fog seal and striping.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 15 40: Decomposed Granite Paving

SECTION 32 15 40

DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

C. The standards set forth in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards and the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards, latest editions, shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the complete installation of decomposed granite paving, including redwood headers as shown in the Plans and as specified herein.

1.03 References
A. Caltrans Standard Specifications, latest edition.

1.04 Submittals
A. Submittals for specified items are not required; however, submittals are required for any proposed substitutions or deviations from the Plans or Specifications. Additionally, submittals are required for the specific items listed below. The Contractor shall submit a materials summary sheet indicating which items will be installed as specified and which items are proposed for substitutions. The Contractor shall submit proof of order within ten (10) working days of the Notice to Proceed, indicating all specified materials have been ordered, noting “as specified” or “substitution proposed” . Submittals are required on the following items:

1. Decomposed granite material and binding material: provide a sample “brick” for review and approval.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 Crushed Quarry Rock
A. Crushed rock, graded between #4 and #200 . Rock shall be high quality and well-graded.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 15 40: Decomposed Granite Paving

B. Hastie’s Capitol Sand and Gravel, Roseville, CA (916) 989- 4600 or accepted equal.

2.02 Header
A. 1”x6”or2”x6” Redwood header board.

2.03 Binding Material
A. PolyPavement, Los Angeles, CA (323) 954-2240 or accepted equal.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Preparation
A. Upon completion of grading operations, compact the subgrade at the required elevation to a relative compaction density of 95%, unless otherwise noted on the Plans.

B. Completely install redwood header as shown in the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards.

C. No material shall be placed in muddy conditions, nor shall any material be placed during or immediately after inclement weather, i.e. rain storms, etc.

D. Submit samples of crushed rock to a PolyPavement Certified Lab to prepare a laboratory “brick” to confirm that the quarry material has sufficient fines for good binding.

3.02 Installation
A. Provide a 10’ by specified width test sample, to be approved prior to installation.

This sample shall be the basis of overall approval.

B. Thoroughly combine binder per manufacturer recommendations.

C. Spread crushed granite fine/binder material in two (2) one and one half inch (1- 1/2”) lifts (thickness after compaction).

D. Wet and roll each lift to form a uniform, smooth surface with a cross slope of 2%. Compact each lift to a 95% relative compaction density.

E. Upon completion of the final lift, fill any depressions, holes or divots and re- roll using the above process.

F. Provide a Certificate of Compliance verifying that the binder/stabilizer has been mixed per manufacturer’s recommendations.

3.03 Clean Up and Protection
A. Thoroughly clean all areas where work has occurred. Remove from site excess material, debris and rubbish.

B. Take all precautions to protect completed work . Immediately repair or replace all damaged areas due to tire ruts, erosion, compaction failure, etc.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 31 13: Chain Link Fencing

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 32 19: Modular Concrete Retaining Walls

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

SECTION 32 84 00

IRRIGATION SYSTEM
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the complete installation of an automated irrigation system, including all necessary appurtenances for proper operation, noted or implied, as shown on the Plans and as specified herein.

B. Water usage, meter costs, connection fees, testing and other associated utility costs are considered direct costs and is the responsibility of the Contractor until the project is accepted.

C. Installation of the water meter shall be by the City.

1.03 Related Work
A. Section 32 90 00: Planting
B. Section 26 00 00: Site Electrical

1.04 Quality Assurance
A. All work shall comply with local and state laws, codes, regulations and requirements which govern any portion or all of the work contained in this Section. These include, but are not limited to, the latest editions of:

1. City of Roseville Park Construction Standards,

2. City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards,

3. City of Roseville Electric Department Standard Specifications,

4. Local, state and federal electrical codes, manuals and guidelines, and

5. Local, state and federal plumbing codes, manuals and guidelines.

1.05 Submittals
A. Submittals for specified items are not required for Parks or Streetscape projects, unless specifically listed below. However, submittals are required for any proposed substitutions or deviations from the parks Plans or Specifications. For Streetscapes, no substitutions will be accepted. The Contractor shall submit a materials summary sheet indicating which items will be installed as specified For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

and which items are proposed for substitutions . The Contractor shall submit proof of order within ten (10) working days of the Notice to Proceed, indicating all specified materials have been ordered, noting “as specified” or “substitution proposed”. Submittals are required on the following items:

1. Controller, Flow Sensor(s), and Master Valve(s).

2. Filter (Recycled water)

3. Booster Pump

4. Shrub bubbler

5. Overhead Spray

6. Remote Control Valve, Quick Coupling Valve, Gate Valve

7. Control Wire

8. PVC Pipes, fittings

1.06 Explanation of Drawings
A. The drawings are diagrammatic and do not reflect all offsets, fittings and other miscellaneous items required for a complete and operable irrigation system . It shall be the Contractor’s responsibility to investigate all existing site conditions, become thoroughly familiar with the site, and provide all labor, materials and equipment required for the installation of the irrigation system.

B. Avoid conflicts between other trades and the installation of the irrigation system.

Minor adjustments to avoid such conflicts shall be made in the field. Major discrepancies between actual field conditions and the Plans shall be brought to the attention of the Project Manager . The lack of notification shall indicate that the Contractor assumes full responsibility for any revision deemed necessary to ensure proper installation.

1.07 Product Delivery, Handling and Storage
A. All materials shall be delivered bearing manufacturer’s label with size, type and model number (if applicable) clearly marked.

B. All pipe shall be delivered in a vehicle which allows the material to lie flat without concentrated weight or stress at any point.

C. Unload all materials with care so as to avoid damage . Store materials in a covered area and do not expose PVC pipe to extreme sun or heat . Store pipe lying flat.

D. Do not install any material that has been damaged. Replace all material found to be damaged.

1.08 Record Drawings
A. The Contractor shall keep an accurate record of the as -built conditions of the irrigation system . These records shall be updated daily and kept at the For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

construction site. At any time, the Inspector may examine the conditions of the “as-builts” to ensure compliance of the above.

B. Dimensions shall be recorded from two (2) permanent points of reference.

C. The City may at its discretion withhold progress payments to the Contractor if the as-built records are not updated to the satisfaction of the City.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 General
A. All materials specified shall be new, bearing the brand name, type, serial numbers and model number as shown on the Plans and as specified herein, unless otherwise accepted in writing.

2.02 Backfill Material
A. Backfill shall be clean, screened, on- site material, free from organic material, large clods of earth and/or rock larger than one (1) inch in diameter, trash, debris, rubbish, tree trunks, broken concrete or asphalt and other unacceptable material.

B. Material larger than one (1) inch shall be removed from site and legally disposed. All removal shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.

2.03 Meter
A. Meter shall be as shown on the Plans and as required by the City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department.

2.04 B ackflow Prevention Device
A. Backflow Prevention Device shall be as shown on the Plans.

B. Cover shall be insulated, freeze- proof, removable and lockable, manufacturer and model per the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards or accepted equal.

2.05 Filter (Recycled Water Only)
A. Amiad Filtration Systems, Semi-Automatic Filter

1. For 2”, Plastic Super-T Semi-Automatic Filter.

2. For 3” and above, Steel In-line Semi-Automatic Filter.

3. Include Scanaway 130 micron filter element.

4. Match line size of recycled water meter, down to 2” minimum.

5. Include lockable protective frost cover blanket.

2.06 Flow Sensor and Master Valve
A. Calsense Controllers:

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

1. Flow sensor shall be a Calsense Ultrasonic Flow Meter (FM-2U) , or accepted equal. Flow sensor shall be accurate to +/- 2% of full scale. Flow sensor body shall be constructed of Schedule 80 PVC for sizes up to 4”, and saddle taps for sizes 6” and above.

2. Master valve(s) shall be Superior, 3300 series, normally open, electric globe valve, constructed of brass with dirty water protection and No Minimum Flow feature. For recycled water systems, include - RW Recycled Water designation with purple handle for identification.

3. Flow meters to be constructed consistent with the Calsense specifications.

4. Valve boxes for master valve and flow sensor shall be 18” (jumbo) green rectangular rigid plastic valve boxes with lockable lids and extensions by Carson Industries, LLC or accepted equal. Valve box lid shall be colored green in turf areas, tan in natural planter areas, and purple for recycled water applications.

2.07 Booster Pump
A. Customflow Quality Booster Pump by V-Power Equipment, Inc. (888) 830-8025.

B. Provide technical startup support, pump certification and 30 month following delivery warranty by V-Power Equipment, Inc.

C. Variable Frequency Drive Control Panel with Fuji Eco Drive, NEMA 12 enclosure, main disconnect, DC choke, panel cooling fan, HOA switch on panel door, 110 volt transformer for controls and external fan, Terminals for wire connections, (2) Pump start relays for irrigation controller controls, ET/U.L. 508A Listed and proprietary programmed for City of Roseville standard operation by Custom Pump & Power, Inc.

D. IFM Efector PA3224 transducer is rated for 0 -145PSI and adjustable through the VFD.

E. Enclosures to be sized to fit pump, VFD, valves, bypass, transducer, and pump inserted Hot Stop temperature protection to be activated at 120 degree with manual reset mounted on the VFD panel door. Flange connection for inlet and outlet outside the enclosure. Standard enclosure to be fitted for padlock and have a shock assisted opening on the front. Larger enclosures with removable doors with built in lock with the 402 key. All enclosures to be steel and powder coated dark green.

F. Installation by licensed contractor as shown on plans and connect power wires from meter pedestal and 24-volt control wire from the controller to the VFD line connectors inside the enclosure.

2.08 Pipe
A. PVC Pressurized Mainline
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

1. For lines three inch (3”) or larger: polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 1120-1220, SDR 21, Class 200 rubber gasketed pipe, and NSF accepted per Standard No. 14, Type I, Grade I. Conform to:

Material ASTM
Pipe D1784, D2241
Rubber Gasket F477

2. For lines two and one half inches (2-1/2”) or smaller: Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 1120-1220, and NSF accepted per Standard No. 14, Type I, Grade I. Conform to:

Material ASTM
Pipe D1784, D1785
B. PVC Non-Pressurized Lateral Lines

1. Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) 1120-1220, SDR 21.0, NSF accepted per Standard No. 14, Type 1, Grade II.

C. Recycled Water

1. Pipes shall meet the standards outlined in Sections 2.08 , A and B above, unless otherwise noted in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards for recycled water, latest edition.

2. All pipes containing recycled water shall be purple, NSF accepted and conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

2.09 Fittings and Nipples
A. Fittings for Mainline Pipe:

1. For all control valves on mainlines three inches (3”) and larger, use painted, ductile iron saddle taps with double stainless steel straps and nuts Model #202 by Romac Industries, Inc. or accepted equal.

2. For all other connections on mainlines three inches (3”) and larger mainline pipe, use glued schedule 80 fittings.

3. For all control valves on mainlines two and one half inches (2- 1/2”) or smaller, use glued schedule 80 fittings.

4. For all other connections on mainlines two and one half inches (2- 1/2”) or smaller, use glued schedule 40 fittings.

B. Fittings for Solvent Weld Pipe- Laterals:

1. Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC), standard weight, conforming to ASTM D2466-73.

2. Weld-on #P-70 primer and Weld-on #711 gray glue or accepted equal.

3. Teflon tape for all threaded PVC fittings.

C. Plastic Nipples shall be Schedule 80, Type 1, Grade 1, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), threaded at both ends, and conforming to ASTM D1784 - 85. Nipples shall be uniformly gray.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

D. Fittings for Recycled Pipe:

1. Fittings shall meet the standards outlined in Sections 2.09, A, B and C above, unless otherwise noted in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards for recycled water, latest edition.

2.10 Swing Joints
A. Swings joints shall be as shown in the City Parks Construction Standard detail.

Schedule 40 threaded PVC triple swing joints or an accepted equal.

2.11 Electric Remote Control Valve
A. Sizes as shown on the Plans . All valves shall be Rainbird PEB series or accepted equal and shall contain the following:

1. a globe-type electric remote control, normally closed diaphragm type with slow opening and closing action,

2. encapsulated solenoid type actuation,

3. a minimum rating of twenty-four (24) volts,

4. sixty (60) cycle,

5. two to five (2-5) watts,

6. a manual flow adjustment with shut-off provisions,

7. provisions for an external “bleed” of the diaphragm chamber for manual operation.

8. a ball valve on the inlet.

9. Schedule 80 PVC threaded fittings from main line to valve.

B. Valve boxes shall be rectangular , rigid plastic valve boxes with lockable lids and extensions by Carson Industries, LLC or accepted equal . Valve box shall be sized appropriately to house entire valve assembly with space to accommodate maintenance access. Valves for drip zones require Jumbo size boxes.

1. Boxes shall be colored green in potable applications , and purple for recycled water applications.

2. Valve boxes used on recycled water systems shall be permanently colored purple through the manufacturer. Boxes painted purple will be rejected.

3. Label lids using heat branded identification, T:Turf, S:Shrubs, B:Bubblers C. Controller station identification number shall be standard yellow tags with permanent numbers by Christy or accepted equal.

2.12 Root Watering System
A. Provide pre-manufactured root watering system.

1. Pressure compensating bubbler. See irrigation sheets for flow rates.

2. C heck valve where applicable to prevent low head drainage.

3. Swing joint assembly
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

4. Locking grate top on semi-rigid mesh tube. Use purple grate for Recycled water systems

5. Filter fabric sleeve

2.13 Irrigation Heads
A. All irrigation heads shall conform to type, size, precipitation rate, gallons per minute discharge, pressure and throw radius as shown on the Plans, unless otherwise accepted in writing.

B. In all available models, all irrigation heads shall have stainless steel risers, unless otherwise approved in writing.

C. For recycled water applications, irrigation heads shall be colored purple, have debris pocket, and wiper seals with 3 touch points.

D. Irrigation heads shall have built-in pressure regulation for pop up sprays and/or water-efficient heads.

E. Include built-in check valve where applicable to prevent low head drainage.

2.14 Drip Irrigation
A. Sub-surface dripline.

1. Flexible polyethylene tubing shall have factory -installed pressure- compensating, inline emitters spaced evenly per listed spacing.

2. Emitter shall incorporate elemental or ionic copper root intrusion prevention technology, and shall be warranted by the manufacturer to be free of emitter plugging due to root intrusion for a period of fifteen (15) years minimum.

3. Emitter shall have a built-in check valve that will hold back, at minimum, an

8.5' column of water.

4. Dripline for use with recycled water systems shall be properly and permanently marked for non-potable use.

B. All fittings shall be constructed of injection molded, brown plastic having a nominal outside dimension of 17mm (0.56”). Female and male threaded ends shall be capable of mating to standard PVC pipe with tapered threads.

C. Line flushing valve

1. Valve shall be schedule 40 PVC ball valve with brass hose thread adapter.

2. Valve box shall be rigid plastic, with lockable cover by Carson Industries, LLC or accepted equal. Boxes shall be colored green in potable applications, and purple for recycled water applications.

3. Drip system operation indicator shall be Rainbird 1812 Pop-up spray body with 4-VAN nozzle set to 0-degree pattern, with Rainbird SA-125050 swing assembly and XFF-TFA barbed bt ½” FIPT fitting, or accepted equal.

D. Pressure Regulating Filters shall be Rainbird PRB Pressure Regulating Basket Filter, or approved equal, and shall include: Basket style body and jar -top cap constructed of heavy -duty glass -filled, UV -resistant polypropylene, with 150 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

PSI (10,3 bar) operating pressure rating. Standard 200 mesh (75 micron) filter screen constructed of stainless steel attached to propylene frame. Normally - open in-line pressure regulating device, constructed of durable, UV resistant non-corrosive material able to accommodate an inlet pressure rating of not less than 150 PSI (10,3 bar), with preset outlet pressure of approximately 40 PSI (2,8 bar).

2.15 Thrust Blocks
A. All thrust blocks shall be concrete. The size of the blocks shall be determined by the average safe soil-bearing load of 700 lbs. per square foot.

B. Polyethylene sheeting at thrust blocks shall be 6mil.

2.16 Quick Coupler Valves
A. For potable water, quick coupling valves shall be Rainbird #44LRC or accepted equal. For recycled water, quick coupling valves shall be Rainbird #44NP lockable or accepted equal. All quick coupling valves shall be:

1. brass or bronze with one (1) IPS female pipe connection,

2. two piece body with a removable upper portion (for replacement), and

3. durable yellow covers for potable and purple for recycled.

B. Valve keys shall be brass or bronze and shall be of the same manufacturer and size as the valve.

C. Valve box shall be rigid plastic, a minimum of ten inches (10”) in diameter with lockable cover by Carson Industries, LLC or accepted equal . Boxes shall be colored green in potable applications, and purple for recycled water applications.

D. Where recycled water is used, conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards.

2.17 Manual Valves
A. For pipe four inches (4”) and larger gate valves shall be:

1. located where shown on the Plans,

2. flanged with Class 125 cast iron body,

3. bronze trimmed with a non-rising stem,

4. square operating nut,

5. able to withstand a cold water pressure of 150 pounds per square inch, and

6. sized to match the pipeline which the valves serve, unless otherwise shown on the Plans.

B. For pipe three inches (3”) or smaller and on pipes which feed directly into a remote control valve, ball valves shall be installed and shall:

1. allow for manual operations,

2. rapid on/off , drip-tight shut-off control,
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

3. be constructed of bronze or brass with heavy-duty handle,

4. operate up to 22 gallons per minute,

5. operate between 15 and 150 pounds per square inch, and

6. be sized to match the pipeline which the valves serve, unless otherwise shown on the Plans.

C. Valve box shall be rigid plastic, a minimum of ten inches (10”) in diameter with extensions and lockable cover by Carson Industries, LLC, as shown on the Plans or accepted equal. Boxes shall be colored green in potable applications, and purple for recycled water applications.

2.18 Automatic Irrigation Controller
A. Automatic controllers shall be Calsense CS3000 or accepted equal . Each controller shall include:

1. CS3-## – Calsense (##) Station Base Model,

2. FM-U – Flow Meter (Ultrasonic),

3. - S1– Stainless Steel Enclosure with 1 hole for Stubby Antenna.

4. CS3000 Transient Protection

5. TP-110 – AC Line Protection,

6. GR- STUBBY – Antennae w/2ft cable

7. On/Off Switch

8. GFI electrical outlet inside enclosure.

When multiple controllers are used, include:

1. CS3-FL – Flowsense software (for multiple controllers sharing POC and/or communications)

2. CS3-MSSE-KIT or CS3-SR-KIT – Hardwire or SR radio,
When multiple flow sensors are used, include:

11. CS3-2WIRE-OPT & CS-2W-POC (one per POC) – Additional Flow Meter interface.

B. Third-Party Communications hardware required:

1. Sierra Wireless AirLink RV55 LTE-A PRO Router (#1104303)

2. Router AC Adapter (#2000579)

3. AT-5 (or higher) Ethernet Cable - 1ft (#A3L781-01-BLU) C. Communication wire between controllers, when required, shall be Paige Cable P7171D or accepted equal.

2.19 Control Wires
A. Direct burial solid copper wire AWG-U.F. 600 volt.

B. Common wire and two spare wires shall be minimum #12-gauge.

C. Pilot wires shall be red, minimum #14-gauge. Wire gauge shall be, at minimum:

Wire Gauge #14 #12 #10 #8
Max. Distance (ft.) 2,500 3,250 4,000 4,800
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

D. Splices:

1. Wire connections at remote control valves only shall utilize 3M direct bury splice kit model #DBY (yellow) or model #DBR (red).

2. All other splices, including line splices, connections to flow meters and other sensors, shall utilize 3M Scotchcast 3570G Connector Sealing Packs, no known equal.

E. Wiring colors shall be:

USE COLOR
Flow Yellow
Master Blue
Pump Black
Valves Red
Common White
Spare Orange
Tracer Green

2.20 Sleeves
A. Schedule 40 PVC 1120- 1220 and two times the diameter of the pipe to be accommodated by the sleeve, one (1) for control wires and one (1) for main line, and one (1) for lateral lines.

B. Maximum one (1) line per sleeve.

C. Add one (1) spare, same size as largest.

2.21 Tracer Wire
A. Insulated solid copper wire, minimum #12 gauge. Color shall be green.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Site Conditions
A. Prior to start of irrigation work, review the site conditions to verify that stub- outs, points of connections, sizes of the points of connections, water pressure and other essential items necessary for irrigation work to commence are as shown on the Plans and as indicated in the Specifications.

B. Notify the Inspector immediately of any existing conditions which are unacceptable for the commencement of irrigation work.

3.02 Coordination of Work
A. Coordinate all work with other trades.

B. The irrigation plan is diagrammatic . Whenever possible, locate all pipes in planted or turf areas. Do not scale off of the Plans. Where field conditions have changed, notify the Inspector immediately.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

3.03 Excavation and Trenching
A. Trenches shall be dug straight and in such a manner as to completely support the pipe continuously along the bottom of the trench. In rocky conditions, over- excavation and placement of clean bedding material may be required to ensure protruding rocks do not place undue stress on pipes. Trench layout shall follow that shown on the Plans, except where accepted by the City.

B. The following minimum cover shall be provided for pipe:

Pipe Type Minimum Cover
Pressurized Mainlines 24”
Non- Pressurized Lateral Lines 18”
Domestic Water Lines 24”
Control wires 24”
PVC Sleeves under Paving 18”
PVC Sleeves under Auto X-ings 24”
C. Install detection wire, looped in and out of valve boxes and attached to all irrigation mainlines.

D. High voltage wires shall not be installed in the same irrigation water line trench.

3.04 Testing and Flushing
A. Pressure Testing shall occur only when the following conditions can be fulfilled:

Item Description Condition
Quick coupler valves Installed and capped
Electric remote control valves Installed
Flow valve Installed and open
Ball/Gate valves Installed and open
Lateral lines Disconnected
Welded PVC joints Cured at least 24 hours
Pipe Center loaded with backfill
Concrete Thrust Blocks Installed and cured at least 48 hours Couplings and fittings Exposed
Detection wire Installed
B. A pressure gauge shall be installed at the lowest point of the line. Continuous pressure shall be applied at a rate of 125 psi for all mainlines . The pressure shall remain stable for a minimum of two hours with no detectable leakage .

Upon completion of the test, a complete examination of the line shall be conducted by the City. Leaks resulting from the test shall be repaired and the line shall be re-tested. This process shall be repeated until the line passes the leakage test.

C. All lines and risers shall be flushed prior to final installation of irrigation heads.

All control valves shall be left open during the flushing process.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

3.05 Backfilling and Compacting
A. Backfilling of trenches shall not occur until all tests and reviews have been performed. See inspection record contained in the Parks Construction Standards, latest edition. Any trench that is prematurely backfilled may be required to be re-dug for review.

B. Compaction of the trenched areas shall meet the following compaction rates of 95% in areas to receive paving and 85% in areas to be planted.

C. Do not flood trenches unless otherwise accepted by the City.

D. Sunken trenches shall be re-finished flush with the adjacent grades.

3.06 Backflow Prevention Device and Enclosure
A. Install per local codes and manufacturer’s instructions.

B. When the flow meter is installed above grade, install a backflow prevention device enclosure with lockable gate.

3.07 Flow Meter Installation
A. Install per local codes and manufacturer’s instructions.

B. All flow meters shall be installed in ground.

C. Install 3/4" conduit from irrigation controller to flow meter valve box. Install a pull box every 100’.

D. Valve box lids shall be permanently marked identifying FM for flow meter and MV for master valve and GR for grounding rod with heat branding using stencils in a uniform location on all boxes throughout.

3.08 Booster Pump Installation
A. Install per local codes and per manufacture's instruction.

B. Furnish wires and conduits to connect electrical power, and 24-volt pump start controls to the VFD panel located inside the VFD panel
C. Ductile iron plumbing from the flanges above ground to the mainline.

D. Install level concrete housekeeping pad for the pump enclosure per plans, 4" thick, 1"above ground, with 1/2" tool edges
E. Trust blocks to be installed per pump manufacturer’s and landscape architect’s requirements.

3.09 Pipe Installation
A. Install irrigation pipe in planted areas whenever possible.

B. All pipe and fittings shall be cleaned and free from dirt, dust and moisture.

C. Pipe may be assembled along the trench at grade to avoid undue strain on the pipe or the fittings. All solvent weld connections shall be primed before applying glue. Snake the pipe within the trench to compensate for expansion and contraction.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

D. All PVC pipe and metal valve connections shall be made with threaded fittings consistent with drawings PK -15 and PK -16 of the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards.

E. All PVC-to-PVC threaded connections shall be made with Teflon tape.

F. Install concrete thrust blocks in locations where rubber gasketed irrigation mainlines change directions, e.g. ells, tees; as required on other lines and fittings; and at the termination point of the mainline. Do not conduct a pressure test within 48 hours of the thrust block pours. The size of the thrust blocks shall be per manufacturer’s instructions and shall be adequate in size to absorb thrusts up to the maximum internal water pressure. Refer to 3.18 Thrust Blocks.

G. Use glued fittings for all connections inside of a sleeve and within 20’ of a sleeve.

H. When multiple pipes are in the same trench, provide a minimum 2” horizontal separation between pipes, or equal to diameter of pipe, whichever is larger. Do not stack pipes vertically.

3.10 Electric Remote Control Valves
A. Install per local codes, manufacturer’s instructions, City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards and as shown on the Plans.

B. Install one (1) electric remote control valve per box and whenever possible, group valve boxes together. Align boxes in a straight and neat row and flush to finish grade. Provide a minimum of six (6) inches between boxes.

C. All valves shall be tagged for easy identification of valve number. Valve box lids shall be permanently marked identifying valve number and controller letter with heat branding using stencils in a uniform location on all boxes throughout.

D. Each valve shall be separately saddle tapped. Manifolded valves shall be rejected.

E. Locate valve boxes outside of turf areas, adjacent to paving, i.e . sidewalks, hardscape, etc. except where shown on the Plans.

F. Provide a minimum of eighteen (18) inches of a complete set of spare control wires, looped, within all control valve boxes.

3.11 Irrigation Heads
A. Install all heads where shown on the Plans and as specified herein.

B. Turf rotary pop- up heads shall be placed two (2) inches from any edge of adjacent walkway, concrete mow band, concrete curb, header board or other hardscape edging, or as required by current WELO regulations.

C. Rotary pop-up heads shall be installed flush with the top of finish grades of turf or planting areas.

D. Sprinkler head riser nipples sizes shall match or be the same as the riser opening of the sprinkler body.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

E. Install sprinkler heads with internal check valves where heads are located in low drainage areas, i.e. bottom of berms, bottom of drainage swales, toe of slopes, etc.

F. Install all heads perpendicular to ground surface with an offset from the edge of pavement as indicated in the details.

3.12 Drip Irrigation
A. Drip irrigation is to be installed in a grid pattern layout of equal spacing between rows, unless otherwise noted on approved plans.

B. All drip irrigation shall be installed sub- surface, per manufacturer’s specifications. Staple all tubing to soil at 5 feet on- center spacing prior to backfilling.

C. Drip line shall be installed prior to plant installation, with the exception of 15- gallon and larger plant container sizes, which may be installed first at the discretion of the contractor.

D. Line Flushing Valves are to be installed below grade, as detailed, in a valve box with bolt-down lid to allow for periodic inspection and flushing.

1. Minimum of One (1) Line Flushing Valve shall be installed for every fifteen (15) GPM of zone flow, and at every termination point within a zone, and shall be installed at a point farthest away from the source (typically on an exhaust header) as possible.

E. Pop-up drip system operation indicators shall be placed within eighteen inches (18”) of each Flush Valve and shall not be placed such that it will be obstructed by vegetation. Place minimum twelve (12) inches from adjacent hardscapes.

F. If required, Air/Vacuum Relief Valves shall be installed below grade in valve boxes to allow for periodic inspection.

G. Valve box lids shall be permanently marked identifying LF for Line Flush valve and AR for Air/vacuum Relief with heat branding using stencils in a uniform location on all boxes throughout.

3.13 Quick Coupler and Gate Valves
A. Install per local codes and manufacturer’s instructions.

B. Locate valve boxes flush with finish grade, twelve (12) inches from walkways, curbs, header boards, etc., and within planted area whenever possible.

C. Install one (1) valve per box.

D. For quick coupler valves, install at 100 feet on center to the extent possible.

Provide a 24” steel support staked adjacent to the riser using two (2) stainless steel clamps.

E. For gate valves, install at locations indicated on the Plans.

F. For valve boxes installed below grade, provide 3M ball markers.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

G. Valve box lids shall be permanently marked identifying GV for gate valve and QC for quick couplers, and SB for splice boxes with heat branding using stencils in a uniform location on all boxes throughout.

3.14 Automatic Controller
A. Install per local codes and manufacturer’s instructions within the specified enclosure.

B. Provide single Paige Cable P-7171D installed in conduit between all controllers.

C. Provide all necessary wiring for a complete installation between the controller and the valves.

D. Above grade wiring shall be installed in metal conduit, unless otherwise accepted. Securely mount conduit onto enclosure or wall and paint to match the adjacent surface.

E. Provide a grounding rod and bonding for each enclosure as required for lightning protection. Grounding rod shall be consistent with drawing PK-1 of the City of Roseville Parks Construction Standards. Install separate grounding rods for each enclosure where bonding is impractical.

F. Label each controller, using permanent markings, with the letter identification indicated on the Plans. Affix label on the inside of the controller cabinet door.

G. Install 110V outlet (GFIC) inside controller enclosure.

H. Provide two (2) reduced as-built irrigation diagrams, laminated and color- coded indicating controller letter, valve/station numbers, valve size, operating pressure, gallons per minute and type of planting for each valve. See Section 01 10 00: Summary of Work 1.15B.

I. Ground test to be conducted after installation. Test results shall not exceed 25 ohms.

3.15 Control Wires
A. Wherever possible, install control wires in common trenches with mainline. The wires shall be taped in bundles at ten (10) feet on center and laid to the side of the pipe. Provide slack between ties to allow for contraction.

B. Wire valve to controller as shown on the plans.

C. Where runs are long, provide an extra three (3) feet of extra ground and control wires looped at 200’ intervals . Snake wires within trenches to allow for contraction.

D. Line splices shall occur in valve boxes at grade, label and allowed only on lengths greater than 2500’. Show locations on as-built plans.

E. Do not wrap wire around pipe or allow any wiring to be placed in concrete or concrete thrust blocks.

F. Install two (2) spare wires starting from the controller, looped to each valve box to the furthest valve box, without splices.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

3.16 Tracer Wire
A. Install tracer wire on top of the mainline.

B. Provide a twelve-inch (12”) loop in and out of each valve box. Solder all splices.

C. Where potable water lines are placed in a separate trench, install a tracer wire on top of the potable water line.

D. Tracer wire shall be tested during review and pressure test of the mainline.

3.17 Sleeves
A. Install sleeves under all pavement and as shown on the Plans.

B. Install sleeves at the depths indicated in Section 3.03B above.

C. Extend sleeves a minimum of twelve (12) inches beyond the edge of pavement.

D. At every sleeve location installed in roadways, provide a spare PVC sleeve capped at each end and marked with a 3M ball marker.

3.18 Thrust Blocks
A. Install polyethylene sheeting between mainline and concrete.

B. T hrust blocks shall be formed against a solid trench wall. The thrust block cavity shall be in undisturbed soil or previously placed compacted backfill that yields an acceptable allowable bearing pressure.

C. Concrete thrust blocks shall not be poured on valve wires.

3.19 Cross Connection Test ing for Recycled Water Systems A. The Recycled Water System shall be tested for cross connection in accordance with Uniform Plumbing Code Appendix J prior to use.

B. All testing of Recycled Water Systems must be performed utilizing a potable water source via a construction water connection per City of Roseville Construction Standards. No Recycled Water may enter a Recycled Water System until all testing is successfully completed.

C. At the time a cross connection test is to be performed, construction on both the Potable and Recycled Water Systems being tested must be complete and both systems fully operational and functioning as designed.

D. Cross connection testing shall be performed in the system by City forces with the assistance of the contractor. The test must be coordinated through the Parks Department Inspector. Forty -eight (48) hours’ notice is required before the test. Depending on complexity of the site, a preliminary field meet may be required.

3.20 Coverage Test
A. Prior to planting, the Contractor shall perform a coverage test to confirm that water coverage is complete and adequate, and produces no overspray onto For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

hardscapes. Irrigation pressure readings at the head or emission device may also be taken as part of the coverage test to confirm adequate system hydraulics.

B. The coverage test shall be performed on the entire irrigation system and shall be performed in the presence of the Parks Inspector . The irrigation system must be connected to the City water system through the water meter.

Temporary connections are not allowed. On recycled water systems, the coverage test shall take place only after successful completion of the cross - connection test, with the recycled water meter in place.

C. On Park projects containing turf, a comprehensive survey of the Distribution Uniformity (Low Quarter) of each irrigation zone containing turf shall be performed by a third- party, certified irrigation auditor prior to planting of turf.

The irrigation system must be 100% complete, including functionality of the irrigation controller and booster pump, if present. The irrigation auditor shall prepare and submit a report listing each zone’s Distribution Uniformity , including actual mapping data of individual catch cans recorded on irrigation plan sheets, and noting any potential deficiencies in the system leading to any inadequate findings. Reported deficiencies in Distribution Uniformity will be evaluated by the Project Manager and may require corrective measures prior to approval of turf planting. Deficiencies caused by improper installation shall be corrected at no additional cost to City.

3.21 Irrigation Audit
A. A landscape irrigation audit shall be performed after all landscape and irrigation is installed . The irrigation system must be 100% complete, including functionality of the irrigation controller and booster pump, if present.

B. All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a third party certified landscape irrigation auditor. Landscape audits shall not be conducted by the person who designed the landscape or installed the landscape.

C. The water audit shall conform to the specific water audit requirements of the City of Roseville Environmental Utilities Department, and any supplemental requirements from the City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department. The contractor shall submit a comprehensive landscape irrigation audit. This shall include, but is not limited to:

1. A completed Irrigation Audit Report-(City of Roseville provided forms only)

2. Complete system evaluation, including site conditions, system and flow data.

3. Scheduling parameters used to set the irrigation controller.

4. An Irrigation schedule for the landscape provided to the owner.

D. A minimum of 25% of all zones shall be audited. The 25% minimum shall be a representative sample of each irrigation method present (i.e. Rotors, bubblers, For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

rotary nozzles, drip, etc.), and is in addition to any turf zones audited during the coverage test.

E. Any deficiencies noted in the audit report such as, but not limited to, run- off, overspray, obstruction of spray patterns, etc., shall be corrected and signed off as such by the original irrigation auditor prior to submission of the report. Do not submit audit reports with uncorrected deficiencies.

3.22 Clean Up
A. Each phase of work shall be immediately cleaned up. Excess equipment, material, etc., shall be legally disposed of and removed from site. All concrete, asphalt and/or decomposed granite paving shall be kept free of soil . Damage to such surfaces shall be immediately repaired to the satisfaction of the City.

PART 4 - GUARANTEE

4.01 General
A. Contractor shall provide a written guarantee covering all materials, equipment and workmanship furnished by him to be free of all defects after installation is accepted, including all defective parts that may have been found.

B. All paved areas shall be swept clean and planted areas shall be weed-free.

C. All irrigation heads shall be properly adjusted. Debris and refuse shall be removed from site prior to inspection.

4.02 Pre-Final (Punch List) Review
A. See Section 01 10 00 1.16 - Summary of Work for notification process.

4.03 Establishment
A. Full automated utilization of the irrigation system shall be included as part of the maintenance of the project. See Section 329000: Planting for additional information.

B. Program and utilize the establishment schedule as submitted with the turn- in items.

C. Contractor to run the system in “quantity” mode or “time plus flow” for a minimum of one (1) week.

D. Check the irrigation system weekly to ensure proper operations. Make all necessary adjustments, including watering schedule to ensure proper and healthy plant growth. At no time shall pools of water be present within any part of the project. Conversely, at no point shall dry or under -watered spots be visible upon inspection. Improper irrigation management resulting in flooding or dry conditions to the detriment of plant material may constitute an extension of the establishment period, at no additional cost to the City.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

4.04 Final Review
A. The Contractor shall demonstrate to the City, valve by valve, the entire irrigation system to be operable. All heads shall be adjusted/flushed and all drip zones shall be flushed prior to the on-site review. Any item requiring adjustments shall be completed immediately and to the satisfaction of the City.

B. Provide necessary training to City staff in the proper operations and maintenance of the booster pump.

C. The date of final acceptance by the City Council or the recordation of the property transfer shall signify the start date of the warranty period. Final acceptance shall include the project in total and will not segregate any specific item or trade included in the construction of the project.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

SECTION 32 90 00

PLANTING
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the complete installation of landscape items, including all trees, shrubs, groundcovers and turf; maintenance for the establishment of new plant materials; and all necessary appurtenances for proper planting, noted or implied, as shown on the Plans and as specified herein.

1.03 Related Work
A. Section 31 20 00: Earthwork
B. Section 32 84 00: Irrigation System

1.04 Quality Assurance
A. Provide an experienced foreman who shall directly supervise the work force during all work to be performed under this contract . The foreman shall be present during the time when work is to be performed.

B. Plant material shall conform to current “American Standards for Nursery Stock” and the State of California Grading Code of Nursery Stock, No. 1 grade. Use only nursery-grown stock.

C. All plant material shall be certified free of plant diseases and insect infestations from the County Agricultural Commissioner as required by law. Each shipment of plant material shall be required to have clearance certificates.

D. Prior to planting, a soils fertility test/analysis shall be conducted by an accepted and qualified testing laboratory . Test results shall contain existing nutrient levels, soil texture, cation exchange capacity, soluble salts, pH levels, infiltration rates and recommended soil amendments/fertilizers to ensure proper growth of the specified plantings.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 90 00: Planting

1.05 Submittals
A. Submittals for specified items are not required; however, submittals are required for any proposed substitutions or deviations from the Plans or Specifications. Additionally, submittals are required for the specific items listed below. The Contractor shall submit a materials summary sheet indicating which items will be installed as specified and which items are proposed for substitutions. The Contractor shall submit proof of order within ten (10) working days of the Notice to Proceed, indicating all specified materials have been ordered, noting “as specified” or “substitution proposed”. Submittals are required on the following items:

1. Bark mulch material,

2. Certificates of compliance for turf seed mix, soil amendments, fertilizers and hydroseed mix,

3. Sod-grown turf,

4. Soils test with soil amendment recommendations.

5. Trees
a) Submit for approval, plant sources including the names of nurseries proposed as sources of acceptable trees, and a list of the trees they will provide. The plant list shall include the botanical and common name and the size at the time of selection, including basal caliper and height. b) Submit all requests for substitutions of plant species or size for approval.

Request for substitution shall be accompanied with a list of nurseries contacted in the search for the required plant and a record of other attempts to locate the required material. Requests shall also include sources of plants found that may be of a smaller or larger size, or a different shape or habit than specified, or plants of the same genus and species but different cultivar origin, or which may otherwise not meet the requirements of the specifications, but which may be available for substitution.

1.06 Soil Testing
A. Native soil and in- place topsoil shall be tested for amendment determination.

Soil Tests shall include soil texture, macro nutrients, micro nutrients, lime, base saturation, pH, sodium, boron, salinity, Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), and Organic content.

B. Submit soils report for review and approval after completion of grading operations. Soil Testing shall be performed by an agriculture- based lab, with detailed, written recommendations for soil amendments and fertilizers specific to ornamental landscape plants and turf.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

1.07 Product Delivery, Handling and Storage
A. All materials shall be delivered bearing nursery label with botanical, common names, including cultivars.

B. Carefully handle plant material to ensure that limbs are not broken during the planting or storage of the material.

C. Store plant material in a covered area on-site, protected from inclement or hot weather on- site. Keep root balls moist by frequent watering (during hot weather) of all accepted stock until such time as planting occurs.

1.08 Inspection of Plant Material
A. Notify the Project Manager a minimum of 48 hours prior to date of delivery. All plant material is subject to inspection at the time of delivery. A sample number of plants will be inspected for the following items:

If the sample.... then the plant shall be...
is healthy, shapely and well rooted accepted.
bears a strong central leader accepted.
is wilted, wind-blown or sunburned rejected.
is root-bound, restricted or deformed rejected.
does not bear a strong central leader or
has been severely pruned back
rejected.

B. Stock to be consistent with CALFIRE Nursery/Tree Quality Cue card and Root Management Cue Card. Inspector may require contractor to remove tree or plant stock from plant containers to examine roots.

C. 15 gal tree needs to have at least 1” in basal caliper, a 24” box tree needs to have at least 2” in basal caliper, a 36” box tree needs to have at least 3” in basal caliper. Basal caliper is measured as 6” above the ground.

D. Based on the sample inspection, the Project Manager or Inspector reserves the right to reject any or all of the plant material delivered. All rejected plant material shall be immediately disposed of off-site.

1.09 Record Drawings
A. The Contractor shall keep an accurate record of the as -built conditions of the landscaping. These records shall be updated daily and kept at the construction site. At any time, the Inspector may examine the conditions of the “as-builts” to ensure compliance of the above.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 Plants
A. The material to be planted shall conform to that indicated on the plans, unless otherwise accepted. The quantity shown on the Plans is approximate and is For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 90 00: Planting

furnished for convenience only . Verify all quantities prior to ordering plant material.

2.02 Turf
A. Turf shall be seed.

B. Seed –

1. 98% pure, weed-free mixture with a minimum of 95% germination. Deliver on-site unopened and in the original containers.

2. 100% Turf Saver RTF (Rhizomatous Tall Fescue) by Barenbrug or accepted equal.

3. Rhyzome – Active Tall Fescue Blend by Pacific Coast Seed or accepted equal:
34% Traverse Turf-type Tall Fescue
33% 3rd Millennium Turf-type Tall Fescue
33% Rhambler Turf-type Tall Fescue

4. Turf seed mix shall be Blue tag certified.

C. Seed must be submitted and accepted by the Project Manager prior to ordering.

2.03 Soil Amendment
A. As recommended by soils test report.

2.04 Mulch
A. Regular “Walk -on” fir bark as manufactured by Redi -Gro Corporation, Sacramento, CA (916) 381- 6063, Mallard Creek, Inc, Rocklin, CA (916) 645- 1681, My Bark Company, Inc., Linden, CA (209) 649-4250 or accepted equal.

B. Decorative bark, shredded lumber or saw dust, and construction debris are not permitted. The mulch must be free of needles.

C. Rock Mulch shall be River Rock as manufactured by Hastie’s Capitol Sand and Gravel, Roseville, Ca (916) 772-7900 or accepted equal.

2.05 Topsoil
A. Stockpiled, on-site material.

B. Imported topsoil shall be natural, friable, well -draining, free from admixture of subsoil and foreign objects larger than one inch (1”) in diameter, free from toxins or any other harmful substance which may deter healthy plant growth.

C. Perform a soils test for all imported soil. Soil test shall comply with Section 1.06.

Submit soils report for review and approval prior to import activities.

2.06 Pre- and Post- Emergent Herbicide
A. Clean, and non-staining. Consult with a pesticide specialist.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

2.07 Tree Stakes and Ties
A. Trees furnished in #15 nursery containers require 2” diameter stakes. Trees less than 8' in height require an 8' stake; trees 8' or greater in height require a 10' stake. Stakes shall be pine or Douglas fir (pressure or non-pressure treated).

B. Trees furnished in 24” boxes or larger require 3” diameter by 10’ long stakes.

Stakes shall be, pine or Douglas fir (pressure or non-pressure treated).

C. Tree ties and Tree Guying shall be Super Tree Tie, bursting strength 300psi, tensile strength 300lbs , 1” vinyl impregnated Nylon, waterproof, Manufactured by: Arthur Enterprises. Cut to length. Color to be Green.

2.08 Native Broadcast Seed
A. Where required, broadcast seed shall be applied as follows:

1. Upland areas
Elymus glaucus (Blue Wildrye) 10.0 lbs/acre
Nassella pulchra (Purple Needlegrass) 9.0 lbs/acre
Nassella cernua (Nodding Needlegrass) 6.0 lbs/acre
Melica caljfornica (Californiameljc) 3.0 lbs/acre
Vulpia microstachys (Small Fescue) 3.0 lbs/acre
Poa secunda (Native Pine Bluegrass) 3.0 lbs/acre
Bromus carinaws (California Brome) 2.0 lbs/acre

2. Wildflowers (addition to seed mix(es) above, if specified) Clarkia amoena (Farewell to Spring) 0.5 lbs/acre
Eschscholzia caljfornica (California Poppy) 2.0 lbs/acre Lupinus nanus {Sky Lupine) 3.5 lbs/acre
Nemophila menziesii (Baby Blue Eyes) 1.5 lbs/acre
Lasthenia californica (Common Goldfields) 1.5 lbs/acre

B. Areas with sandy, dry soil shall receive: Zorro Annual Fescue 6 lbs/acre, Rose Clover 9 lbs/acre
C. A fertilizer consisting of 15- 15-15 shall be applied at a rate of one half pound per 1,000 square feet . Fertilizer shall be Natural -based, slow release, and balanced in N, P, & K.

D. Seed for creek banks shall conform to the latest requirements of the California Department of Fish and Game.

2.09 Biofiltration Sod
A. Shall be Delta Bluegrass Biofiltration Sod, available through Delta Bluegrass Company, contact 800-637-8873 or approved equal
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 90 00: Planting

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 Site Preparations
A. Prior to start of landscaping work, review the site conditions to verify that final grades have been established, plant/turf beds are weed free, and the irrigation system is operational as shown on the Plans and as indicated in the Specifications.

B. For landscaping within all street right -of-ways, conduct a soils analysis test of the existing soils and remove all lime- treated soils, aggregate base or other non-organic material to a minimum depth of two feet before planting or irrigation installation. Import topsoil to bring the finish grade to specified grades. Submit the soils analysis test results of the imported material prior to import.

C. Notify the Inspector immediately of any existing conditions which are unacceptable for the commencement of landscaping work.

3.02 Coordination of Work
A. Coordinate all work with other trades.

3.03 Preparation of Planting and Turf Areas
A. Upon completion of grading and underground activity, Contractor shall obtain a soils test as outlined in 1.06.

B. Place stockpiled topsoil in all areas to receive planting or turf to a minimum depth of twelve inches (12”).

C. Rip topsoil surface in two directions to a minimum depth of twelve inches (12”).

D. Spread soil amendments at the rates indicated in the soils report.

E. Rototill amendments to recommended depths . Till amendments to a depth of 6” or as recommended by soils report.

F. Remove all rock and debris which are greater than ½ inch in areas to be turfed and one inch (1”) in areas to be planted.

G. All planted and turf areas to be smooth and uniform in grade as shown on the Plans.

H. Planting areas to be sloped to drain as shown on the Plans.

3.04 Storage of Plants and Trees
A. Protect materials from deterioration during delivery and storage. Adequately protect plants from drying out, exposure of roots to sun, wind or extremes of heat and cold temperatures. If planting is delayed more than 24 hours after delivery, set plants in a location protected from sun and wind. Provide adequate water to the root ball package during the shipping and storage period, including weekends and Holidays.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

B. Soil moisture shall be maintained above wilting point and below field capacity for the root ball substrate or soil.

C. All plant materials must be available for observation prior to planting. Any plants determined to damaged or distressed due to improper watering may be rejected by inspector and shall be replaced at no cost to City.

3.05 Plant Installation
A. Tree and Shrub Planting

1. Remove only those plants which will be planted the same day . Place such plants in the proposed locations for review and accepted by the City prior to actual planting. Notify the Inspector a minimum of 48 hours prior to day of planting.

2. Dig planting pits as shown on the Plans and as shown in the Parks Construction Standards . Scarify the sides and bottom of pit to prevent glazing. Fill pit completely with water and allow the water to completely drain from the pit prior to actual planting.

3. Relocate any plantings taller than 6” in height that fall in front of any irrigation head in order to ensure proper coverage of the irrigation system.

4. For pits that retain water, completely penetrate the hardpan layer at the bottom of the pit and backfill with topsoil. Fill pit with water to test and ensure proper drainage.

5. Prior to tree planting a central leader needs to be established by structural pruning, as necessary. Codominant leaders need to be removed or suppressed by structural pruning. Refer to the CALFIRE "Tree Training", "Tree Planting", and "Tree Quality" cue cards and "Tree and Plant Root Management Standard and Quality Expectations" contained in Section 5 of these Standards.

6. Plants shall be removed from their containers only at the time of placement within the plant pit. Perform root pruning on all four sides of the root ball by shaving and cutting away the root bal l periphery to reduce the amount of circling roots. Starting from the top and then cutting/slicing down to the bottom of the root ball. On a 15 gal container at least 1- 1.5 inches of the root ball periphery needs to be removed by slicing or shaving. On a 24” and 36”box tree at least 2 inches of the root ball periphery needs to be removed by slicing or shaving. A sharp hand pruning saw needs to be used for the slicing or shaving of the root ball. Refer to the CALFIRE "Root Management" cue card contained in Section 5 of these Standards. This process will remove many girdling and circling roots deflected by the container wall and allows for root penetration within the planting basin. Spread all roots to the side to allow proper root development. Add native backfill and amendments For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 90 00: Planting

as shown in the Parks Construction Standards and as recommended by the soils testing laboratory.

7. Plant tree at least three inches (2”) above grade on mount to prevent bowl effect. The tree’s beginning root flare must be located at top of grade with installed sod.

8. Carefully place plant into the plant pit without damaging the root ball. Water the backfill until saturated. For trees, water in by hand after planting using at least ten (10) gallons of water, minimum.

9. Construct berm and place tree stakes and install mulch per the Parks Construction Standards. Mulch is required for trees within the turf area.

10. Where mowing will occur, provide an eight -foot (8’) minimum horizontal clearance between trees and other site improvements, including shrubs.

11. Tree ties should be installed via a figure eight loop and each tie shall be secured with a nail on the tree stake. Install two (2) Arbor Ties at 2/3 of tree height and two (2) Arbor Ties at ½ of tree height.

12. Tree stakes should be inserted into the ground to a minimum depth of 18".

B. Groundcover Planting

1. Place groundcover plants in neat, straight, and parallel rows, triangularly spaced as shown on the Plans and as indicated herein.

2. Start the first row of planting at a distance equal to the on- center spacing required per plan, minimum, from the edge of the adjacent hardscape, mow band or header board.

3. Groundcover shall be installed to the outside edge of the water basins of trees or shrubs.

3.06 Seeding- Turf and Native
A. Lightly scarify areas to be hydroseeded.

B. Tank, hose and associated apparatus must be thoroughly clean and free of debris or other material prior to placement/spraying of seed.

C. Hydroseed turf mix shall contain the following:

Material Application Rate
Turf Seed Per Manufacturer’s Recommendations
Wood Cellulose Fiber Mulch 60 lbs. per 1,000 SF
Binder Per Manufacturer’s Recommendation
Fungicide turf only 1/3 lb. per 1,000 SF
Fertilizer Per soils lab recommendation and as
approved by Parks, Recreation & Libraries
Department
Soil Conditioner Per Soil Conditioner soils lab
recommendation and as approved by
Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

D. Blend mix in a hydraulic mixer until all material is consistently blended.

E. Apply mix at a rate of 125 pounds per 1,000 square feet unless otherwise recommended by the manufacturer.

F. Spray mixture consistently over the area to be hydroseeded. Protect adjacent areas such as paving, walls, play areas and other from overspray.

G. At the end of each day of spraying operations, clean up all areas where overspray has occurred.

H. Once seed is placed, it should not be allowed to dry out.

3.07 Biofiltration Sod
A. Remove all “humps” and depressions prior to sodding.

B. Keep all sod rolls shaded and moist prior to installation.

C. Do not store sod rolls more than one (1) day. Sod shall be laid upon delivery.

D. Unroll sod one at a time for immediate installation.

E. Provide tight seam between rolls of sod (less than 1/8” gaps).

F. Stagger rows so that the ends of sod rolls are stepped.

G. For turf areas where sod is partially provided, add topsoil at all transition edges to same as finish grade.

3.08 Mulch
A. Prior to placing mulch, apply post -emergent herbicide to any weeds present, per label directions.

B. Prior to placing mulch, apply pre- emergent herbicide in all planting areas, per label directions.

C. Apply three inches (3”) of mulch in all landscape planter areas.

D. Keep mulch a minimum of three inches (3”) away from the trunks of all woody shrubs and four inches (4”) away from all trees. Taper mulch profile away from this point to prevent subsequent collection of mulch against trunks.

3.09 Watering
A. Upon completion of each planting or turf area, irrigate appropriately to ensure proper health and growth.

B. Continually adjust the irrigation for plant needs regardless of air temperature.

3.10 Clean-up
A. Upon completion of planting operations, collect and remove from site all empty plant containers, debris, rubbish and other trash.

B. Sweep clean and wash all hardscape areas.

C. Clean up shall occur, at minimum of once a week, at the end of the work week.

D. Maintain the entire site in a clean condition to the satisfaction of the City.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 32 90 00: Planting

3.11 Pre-Final (Punch List) Review
A. See Section 011000 1.16 of the Summary of Work for notification process.

B. The following conditions must be met in order for planting to be considered towards substantial completion, as required to enter into the establishment period described in Section 011000, 1.16:

1. For seeded turf:
a. Upon completion of the second mowing of completely germinated turf.

Second mowing is defined as full coverage of turfed area 90% weed free. b. Root depth – Turf grass roots shall be healthy, creamy-white in color and be 4” or greater in length/depth as measured from the soil surface to root tip. This shall be consistent throughout turfed area.
c. Turf shall be of uniform green color with no visible signs of stress due to soil fertility, moisture, disease or pests.

2. For sodded turf:
a. Accepted installation of the sod.
b. Turf shall be of uniform green color with no visible signs of stress due to soil fertility, moisture, disease or pests.

3. For trees and shrubs:
a. Trees and shrubs shall be properly installed, and with no visible signs of stress due to soil fertility, moisture, disease or pests.

3.12 Establishment Period
A. Active maintenance is required throughout the entire establishment period:

1. Maintain turf to a height of two and one half inches (2-1/2”) for cool season turf varieties and one and one half inches (1- 1/2”) for warm season turf varieties. Maintained height shall be measured from the surface of finish grade to the top of the leaf blade throughout the establishment period, and mowed as frequently as required to maintain said height. At no time shall the leaf blade be mowed or cut more than 1/3 of the length of the blade.

Root mass/depth must remain consistent as measured at the start of establishment or greater.

2. Edge all turf areas along hardscape edges.

3. Re-seed all bare areas within the turf as soon as evident.

4. Immediately replace all dead plants.

5. As necessary, raise all trees and shrubs which have sunk within the plant pit beyond the levels indicated in the Standard details.

6. Keep all areas free of weeds, pests and disease.

7. For trees located in turf areas, maintain a circle free of turf at a distance described in the Standard details
B. Prior to the start of the final thirty (30) days of establishment:

1. All plant replacements shall be completed.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 32 90 00: Planting

2. All plantings and turf shall be thriving and in a healthy condition.

3. The lack of active maintenance prior to the final thirty (30) days may constitute a delay in the start of the final thirty (30) days of the establishment period.

3.13 Final Review
A. The Inspector shall review the site for completion of items noted, but not limited to, “B” below. All corrective action is required to enter into the final thirty (30) days of establishment.

B. The site shall be prepared for review, by ensuring that:

1. All spray heads have been properly adjusted,

2. Dead plants have been replaced,

3. Planting areas have been weeded,

4. Turf areas have full germination, are consistent in green color and are weed-free,

5. Walkways and paved areas have been swept and washed, and

6. Turf roots meet standards outlined in 3.10
C. Failure to complete any one or all of the above items may constitute non- performance of the final review and will require re-scheduling. In this case, the cost of the extended establishment period shall be at no additional cost to the City.

PART 4 - GUARANTEE

4.01 General
A. Contractor shall provide a written guarantee covering all plant materials (trees & shrubs) furnished by him to be free of all defects or disease and that all plants are in a healthy and thriving condition at the completion of the contract .

Deciduous plant material shall be warranted beyond the time of contract completion until such time as growth becomes evident.

B. All plants, except those provided by the City, shall be warrantied for a period of one (1) year, commencing on the date of final acceptance. The warrant y shall be as outlined in Section 011000: Summary of Work, paragraph 1.19.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

SECTION 33 00 00

UTILITIES
PART 1 - GENERAL

1.01 General Requirements
A. The requirements set forth in the General Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

B. The requirements set forth in the Supplemental Conditions shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

C. The standards set forth in the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition, for storm drainage throughout the project and for sanitary sewer installations within the public rights -of-ways, easements, or as shown on the improvement plans shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

D. The standards set forth in the latest edition of the California Building Code (CBC) for sanitary sewer installation within the project site, outside of the public right-of-way or easement shall be in addition to the standards provided herein.

1.02 Description
A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the complete installation of the storm drain system and sanitary sewer pipe, and necessary appurtenances as shown on the Plans and as specified herein.

B. Submit a materials listing for review and approval prior to commencement of specified work.

1.03 Related Work
A. Section 31 10 00: Clearing and Grubbing
B. Section 31 20 00: Earthwork

1.04 Safety Requirements
A. Furnish, install and maintain required sheeting, shoring, bracing, and other methods to ensure complete and safe work environment for all workers. Upon completion of work, remove all bracing, shoring, etc . in its entire ty, unless otherwise directed by the Inspector.

B. Prior to excavation or trenching, the Contractor shall contact USA Alert (800) C. 227-2600 to locate all known utilities a minimum of 48 hours prior to start of work. During the course of construction, the Contractor shall take every precaution to maintain and protect utilities noted to remain. Said utilities shall remain operational at all times, unless otherwise noted on the plans.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

D. The existing utilities are shown on the Plans based on the information available at the time of contract document development . The City shall not assume responsibility for any inaccuracies or incompleteness of the Plans based on such information. The Contractor shall immediately notify, upon damage of any pipeline or facility, the Owner and/or its agents and take every action necessary to repair or replace damaged facilities to the satisfaction of the Inspector, and at no additional cost to the City.

E. Trenches, excavations and repair of pavement shall be consistent with Section 31 20 00: Earthwork.

1.05 Coordination
A. The piping system as shown on the Plans is diagrammatic. The Contractor shall make reasonable adjustments to the layout to avoid conflicts, based on actual field conditions. Said changes shall not interfere with the design intent of the system.

1.06 Tolerance
A. The allowable tolerance for the installation of pipe is 0.05 feet within grades or spot elevations indicated on the Plans.

1.07 Product Storage
A. Take every precaution to protect the materials and pipes from damage during the delivery, storage and installation of the pipe system . Store in a cool, contained area, protected from direct sunlight and per manufacturer’s recommendations. Pipe shall be supported on firm level ground at the site.

1.08 Record Drawings
A. The Contractor shall keep an accurate record of the as -built conditions of the storm drain and sanitary sewer system . These records shall be updated daily and kept at the construction site. At any time, the Inspector may examine the conditions of the “as-builts” to ensure compliance of the above.

PART 2 - PRODUCTS

2.01 General
A. All products shall conform to City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition, except as noted below.

2.02 Drain Pipe
A. Solid drainpipe shall be PVC SDR 35 and shall conform to ASTM D1784, or accepted equal. Gasketed connections shall conform to ASTM F477.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

B. Perforated drainpipe shall be smooth walled PVC, open per Caltrans Section 68-1.02K, or accepted equal.

2.03 Drain Rock
A. Drain rock shall be Class 2 washed, ¾” diameter.

2.04 Filter Fabric
A. Filter fabric shall be Mirafi 140N, or accepted equal.

2.05 Drains
A. Drain Inlets shall be pre-cast and a minimum size of twenty -four inches (24”) square or round by Jensen Precast, or accepted equal.

1. Grate shall be heavy duty, cast iron, walk-on, and bolt down.

2. Box extensions shall be Jensen Precast, or accepted equal.

3. The base shall be six inches (6”) thick.

4. Walls shall be six inches (6”) thick.

5. A “No Dumping” Metal Storm Drain Marker shall be affixed to the concrete color of each drain inlet (See Detail DR-20)

6. Contractor may install cast-in-place drain inlets in lieu of pre-cast drain inlets.

Submit shop drawings and concrete mix design for review and approval.

B. Channel Drains for baseball/softball backstop areas shall be Polycast 600 series pre-sloped trench drains with galvanized steel slotted grates or accepted equal.

C. Sanitary sewer clean outs shall be as specified in the City of Roseville, Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

2.06 Manholes
A. Manholes shall have tongue and groove joints, be forty -eight inches (48”) minimum in diameter, meeting ASTM C-478.

B. Covers shall be cast iron.

C. All components shall conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

2.07 Tracer Wire
A. Insulated solid copper wire, minimum #12 gauge. Color shall be green.

2.08 Sanitary Sewer Pipe
A. Vitrified clay pipe (VCP) shall be as specified in Section 91 Sanitary Sewer in the City of Roseville, Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

B. PVC SDR 35 may be used for drinking fountain drain applications only, with prior approval, and shall conform to ASTM D3034.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

2.09 Potable Water Warning Tape
A. On sites with both Recycled water and potable water lines. Blue plastic tape, 3 inches wide, with the words “CAUTION: POTABLE WATERLINE” imprinted in minimum 1 -inch high, black letters. Imprinting shall be continuous and permanent.

2.10 Domestic Water Pipe
A. Water Distribution Main (pipe size 4 inches larger)

1. Ductile Iron Pipe (DID): Pressure Class 350 pipe conforming to AWWA/ANSI C15/A215.5, cement -mortar lining conforming to AWWA/ANSI C104/As1.4, with standard thickness per AWWA/ANSI C150/A21.50 U.S. Pipe, American Cast Iron pipe Company (ACIPCO), or approved equivalent.

2. Flanged ends shall conform to AWWA/ANSI C115/A21.15.

3. Rubber-gasket joints shall conform to AWWA/ANSI C111/A21.11.

B. Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe (PVC): Pressure Class 235, DR 18, spigot and gasket bell end, conforming to AWWA C9000 or AWWA C905, with equivalent cast - iron pipe outer diameter (O.D.). J-M Manufacturing, PW Pipe, North American Pipe Company, or approved equivalent.

C. Polyethylene Pipe (PE): PE 4710, ASTM f714, Pressure Class 200, DR 9, conforming to AWWA C906, or approved equivalent.

PART 3 - EXECUTION

3.01 General
A. All pipes shall slope uniformly from given elevations shown on the Plans.

B. All pipes shall be accurately laid true to line and grade, utilizing accepted construction methods.

C. Damaged or cracked pipe and fittings shall not be installed and shall be removed from site.

D. Install all pipe in locations shown on the Plans, except where existing conditions necessitate minor changes.

E. All pipe and fittings shall be kept clean and closed throughout the course of construction.

F. Connections to existing sanitary sewer stubs shall be “TV -ed” and air tested prior to the start of construction per the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

3.02 Installation
A. Installation of the specified pipe lines shall conform to the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

B. Notify the Inspector a minimum of 48 hours prior to covering of work to ensure timely inspections.

C. Cutting of AC or concrete paving shall be clean, vertical and straight, using a saw, or other tool specific to this application . Replace paving to existing or better condition prior to work.

D. Trench and backfill shall be per City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

E. Catch basins and drain inlets shall be installed with a concrete collar with “No Dumping” message and fish symbol depressed into the concrete or bolted in place, consistent with Drawing DR- 20 the City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

F. Drain inlets installed in mulched planter areas shall have a 12-inch wide collar of 2- to 6-inch river cobble placed over filter fabric.

G. Channel drains shall be set per manufacturer’s instructions . Place slotted grates along the entire length of the backstop, including wing fencing, wherever concrete is placed adjacent to the backstop system . Provide a below grade piped connection at all gate openings into the infield area. Do not install grated drain sections at these entry/exit points.

H. Manholes shall be per City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition. Install grate flush with finish grade.

I. Sanitary Sewer Clean-outs shall be installed with 3M ball markers and shall be located within planted or turf areas, whenever possible. Place clean-outs at 100’ intervals throughout the project . Clean-outs shall not be located within play areas. Install per City of Roseville Design and Construction Standards, latest edition.

J. Upon completion, thoroughly flush storm drain system in the presence of the Parks Inspector.

K. Installation of PVC for Domestic Water

1. Install pipe and fittings in accordance with the requirements o f UNI B-3 for the following:
a) The laying of pipe, joining PVC pipe to fittings and accessories. b) The setting of hydrants, valves, and fittings.

2. Comply with the r ecommendations for pipe joint assembly and appurtenance installation in AWWA Manual M23, Chapter 7, “Installation.”

3. Comply with the applicable requirements of AWWA C600 for joint assembly, and with the recommendations of Appendix A to AWWA C111.

4. Jointing:

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
Project
Date
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

a) Provide push-on joints with the elastomeric gaskets specified for this type joint, using either elastomeric-gasket bell-end pipe or elastomeric- gasket couplings.
b) For pipe-to-pipe push-on joint connections, use only pipe with push -on joint ends having factory-made bevel.
c) For push- on joint connections to metal fittings, valves, and other accessories, cut spigot end of pipe off square and re- bevel pipe end to a bevel approximately the same as that on ducti le-iron pipe used for same type of joint.
d) Use an approved lubricant recommended by the pipe manufacturer for push-on joints.
e) Assemble push- on joints for connection to fittings, valves, and other accessories in accordance with the requirements of UNI B -3 for joining PVC pipe to fittings and accessories and with the applicable requirements of AWWA C600 for joint assembly.
f) Make compression -type joints/mechanical -joints with the gaskets, glands, bolts, nuts and internal stiffeners previously specified for this type joint. Cut off spigot end of pipe for compression- type joint or mechanical-joint connections and do not re-bevel.
g) Assemble joints made with sleeve- type mechanical couplings in accordance with the recommendations of the coupling manufacturer using internal stiffeners as previously specified for compression- type joints.

5. Pipe Anchorage:
a) Provide concrete thrust blocks or restrained joints for pipe anchorage, except where metal harness is indicated on the Construction Documents. b) Anchorage shall be in accordance with the requirements of UNI B-3 and in accordance with NFPA 24 Standards for reaction or thrust bocking and plugging of dead ends, except that size and pos itioning of thrust blocks shall be as indicated on the Construction Documents.

L. Service Line Connections to Water Mains

1. Connect service lines of size shown on plans to the main with a rigid connection or a corporation stop and gooseneck. Install a gate valve on the service line.

2. Connect service lines to ductile-iron water mains in accordance with AWWA C600 for service taps.

3. Connect service lines to PVC plastic water mains in accordance with UNI - B-8 and the recommendations of AWWA Manual M231, Chapter 9, “Service Connections.”
M. Installation of Backflow Preventers
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
KT-52
9/26/24
Section 33 00 00: Utilities

1. Devices shall be installed horizontal and level, with three feet minimum clearance from obstructions.

2. Bottom of backflow device shall be 12-24” above grade.

3.03 Tracer Wire
A. Install tracer wire on top of the potable water lines B. Tracer wire shall be continuous with no splices.

3.04 Potable Water Warning Tape
A. To be used on all potable water piping installed within the same project limits as on-site recycled water piping.

B. Install plastic warning tape in pipe backfill, six inches above pipe, for the entire length of the pipe.

3.05 Cleaning
A. Keep site clean at all times . Remove from the site all debris and rubbish and legally dispose.

END OF SECTION
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
NOVEMBER 2024
PREPARED FOR:

CALLANDER ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC.
12150 TRIBUTARY POINT DRIVE, SUITE 140
GOLD RIVER, CALIFORNIA 95670
PREPARED BY:

GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.
3160 GOLD VALLEY DRIVE, SUITE 800
RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95742
GEOCON PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Sierra Village Drive
Roseville, California
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

Project No. S2759-05-01
November 11, 2024

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Melissa Ruth ASLA, QSP, CPD
Principal | Landscape Architect CA #5425
Callander Associates
12150 Tributary Point Drive, Suite 140
Gold River, CA 95670

Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
CITY OF ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK CONSTRUCTION

SIERRA VILLAGE DRIVE

ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA

Ms. Ruth:

In accordance with your authorization of our pr oposal (Geocon Proposal No. SA-24-0321-P-GT, dated February 15, 2024), we performed a geotechnical inve stigation for the subject project located at the northeast corner of Sierra Village Drive and Silver Spruce Drive in Roseville, California.

The accompanying report presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the project as presently proposed. In our opinion, no adverse geotechnical conditions were encountered that would preclude development at the site provided recommendations of this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project.

Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this report or if we may be of further service.

Respectfully Submitted,

G
EOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.

Haley A. Losberger, GIT Jeremy J. Zorne, PE, GE
Senior Staff Geologist Senior Engineer
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PAGE

1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ....................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................... 2

3.0 SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 2

3.1 Alluvium (Riverbank Formation) ............................................................................................ 2

4.0 GROUNDWATER ............................................................................................................................... 3

5.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ........................................................................................................................ 3

5.1 Regional Active Faults ............................................................................................................ 3

5.2 Ground Shaking ...................................................................................................................... 4

5.3 Liquefaction ........................................................................................................................... 4

5.4 Expansive Soil ......................................................................................................................... 4

5.5 Soil Corrosion Screening ........................................................................................................ 5

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 8

6.1 General ................................................................................................................................... 8

6.2 Seismic Site Class / Seismic Design Criteria ........................................................................... 8

6.3 Soil Excavation Characteristics ............................................................................................. 10

6.4 Materials for Fill ................................................................................................................... 11

6.5 Grading ................................................................................................................................. 11

6.6 Foundations – Shade Structure and Security Lighting ......................................................... 13

6.7 Foundations – Restroom Building ........................................................................................ 14

6.8 Interior Slabs-on-Grade ....................................................................................................... 15

6.9 Slab-on-Grade Moisture Protection Considerations ........................................................... 16

6.10 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement .................................................................................................. 16

6.11 Rigid Concrete Pavement ..................................................................................................... 18

6.12 Site Drainage and Moisture Protection ............................................................................... 18

7.0 FURTHER GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ............................................................................................... 20

7.1 Plan and Specification Review ............................................................................................. 20

7.2 Testing and Observation Services ........................................................................................ 20

8.0 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS ......................................................................... 21

9.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 22

FIGURES
Figure 1, Vicinity Map
Figure 2, Site Plan
Figure 3, Proposed Development Plan

APPENDIX A

FIELD EXPLORATION
Figure A1, Key to Logs
Figures A2 through A6, Logs of Ex ploratory Borings B1 through B5

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Table B1, Expansion Index Test Results
Table B2, R-Value Test Results
Figure B1, Summary of Laboratory Results
Figure B2, Atterberg Limits
Figure B3, Grain Size Distribution
Figure B4, Moisture-Density Relationship
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 1 - November 11, 2024

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed KT-52 Park located at the northeast corner of Sierra Village Drive a nd Silver Spruce Drive in Roseville, California. The approximate site location is depicted on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1.

The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to observe and sample the subsurface conditions encountered at the site and provide conclusions and recommendations relative to the geotechnical aspects of site improvements as presently proposed.

To prepare this report, we:
• Performed a limited geologic literature review to aid in evaluating the geologic and seismic conditions present at the site. A list of referenced material is included in Section 9.0 of this report. • Reviewed available conceptual plans to select exploratory boring locations. • Performed a site reconnaissance to review project limits, determine exploration equipment access, and mark out the proposed exploration locations. • Notified subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing excavations at the site. • Obtained a soil boring drilling permit from the City of Roseville. • Performed five (5) exploratory borings (B1 thro ugh B5) with a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with 8-inch diameter hollow-stem augers and 6-inch diameter solid-flight augers, each to a depth of approximately 16½ feet.
• Obtained representative samples from the exploratory borings. • Logged the borings in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). • Upon completion, backfilled the exploratory borings with neat cement grout in accordance with City of Roseville permit requirements. Excess soil cuttings were spread near the boring locations. • Performed laboratory tests to evaluate pertinent geotechnical parameters. • Prepared this report summarizing our findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding the geotechnical aspects of site improvements as presently proposed.

Approximate locations of the exploratory borings ar e shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2 and Proposed Development Plan, Figure 3. Details of our field exploration program, including exploratory boring logs, are presented in Appendix A. Details of our laboratory testing program and test results are summarized in Appendix B.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 2 - November 11, 2024

2.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The approximate 7.7-acre site is currently developed with an asphalt-paved road oriented north-south along the eastern edge of the site and perimeter fencing in the southeast corner of the proposed park area. Within the perimeter fencing is an existing concrete pad with utility boxes. The remainder of the site is undeveloped. Site-speci fic topography/survey information was not available for our review as of the date of this report. Based on satellite imagery and topographic information obtained from Google Earth Pro (accessed April 24, 2023), the site elevations range from approximately 104 to 111 feet with lower elevatio ns in the proposed open turf areas and higher elevations near the proposed basketball court. The current site configuration is shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2.

The project consists of constructing new cricket/ soccer fields, open turf areas, a new basketball court, a restroom building, a shaded picnic are a, security lighting, playgrounds, landscaping, and paved pedestrian and vehicular paths. Approximate locations and features of the proposed improvements are shown on the Proposed Development Plan, Figure 3. The proposed restroom building will be supported on conventional shallow foundations with an interior concrete slab-on-grade. The proposed shade structure over th e picnic area and security lighting will likely be supported on cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) concrete piers. New pavements will consist of rigid Portland cement concrete (PCC) and flexible hot-mix asphalt (HMA) pavement. We antici pate that site grading will include cuts and fills on the order of 5 f eet or less. Some underground utilities may require deeper excavations.

3.0 SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
We identified soil and geologic conditions by observing exploratory borings and reviewing the referenced geologic literature (S ection 9.0). Soil descriptions below include the USCS symbol where applicable. Site geology generally consists of Alluvium mapped as Riverbank Formation (CGS, 2011).

3.1 Alluvium (Riverbank Formation)
We encountered alluvium in each of our borings to the maximum depth explored of approximately 16½ feet. The alluvium generally consists of hard sandy lean clay with silt (CL), hard sandy silt with clay (ML), and very dense silty sand (SM). Soil cond itions described in the previous paragraphs are generalized. The exploratory boring logs included in Appendix A detail soil type, color, moisture, consistency, and USCS classification of the soils encountered at specific locations and elevations.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 3 - November 11, 2024

4.0 GROUNDWATER
We did not encounter groundwater in our explor atory borings performed on May 23, 2024, to a maximum depth of approximately 16½ feet.

We reviewed available depth-to-groundwater data on the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Data Viewer (https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=SGMADataViewer#gwlevels). The SGMA Data Viewer website indicates that depth to groundwater near the site vicinity ranges from approximately 100 to 120 feet (Spring 2023) below ground surface.

It should be noted that fluctuations in the le vel of groundwater may occur due to variations in precipitation, temperature, and other factors. Depth to groundwater can also vary significantly due to localized pumping, irrigation practices, and seas onal fluctuations. Therefore, it is possible that groundwater may be higher or lower than the levels observed during our investigation.

5.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS

5.1 Regional Active Faults
Based on our research, analyses, and observations, the site is not located on any known “active” earthquake fault trace. In addi tion, the site is not contained within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, we consider the potential for ground rupture due to onsite active faulting to be low. In order to determine the distance of known active faults w i t h i n 5 0 m i l e s o f t h e s i t e , w e u s e d t h e U S G S N a t i o n a l S e i s m i c H a z a r d M a p s website (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_2008_search/query_main.cfm). Principal references used within USGS Nati onal Seismic Hazard Maps website are summarized in Table 5.1.

TABLE 5.1

REGIONAL ACTIVE FAULTS
Fault Name
Approximate
Distance from Site
(miles)
Maximum Moment
Magnitude, MW
Foothills Fault System (Spenceville Fault) 18.7 6.5
Great Valley 03 (Mysterious Ridge) 36.1 7.1
Great Valley 04a (Trout Creek) 36.6 6.6
Great Valley 04b (Gordon Valley) 39.1 6.8
Hunting Creek-Berryessa 48.6 7.1
Great Valley 05 (Pittsburg Kirby Hills) 45.6 6.7
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 4 - November 11, 2024

5.2 Ground Shaking
We used the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Unified Hazard Tool (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/) to determine the deaggregated seismic source parameters including controlling magnitude and faul t distance. The USGS estimated mean magnitude is 6.6 and the estimated Peak Ground Accele ration (PGA) for the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) with a 2,475-year return period is 0.24g.

While listing PGA is useful for comparison of potential effects of fault activity in a region, other considerations are important in seismic design, including frequency and duration of motion and soil conditions underlying the site.

5.3 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which loose, saturated, cohesion less soil deposits located beneath the groundwater table lose strength when subjecte d to intense and prolonged ground shaking. The seismic excitation increases pore water pressure, creating a buoyant effect of the loose soil. When liquefaction occurs, building foundations may sink or tilt and differential ground settlement may occur. Other effects include sand boils (ground loss) and lateral spreading if the liquefiable soil is located adjacent to a steep free face. The areas that have the greatest potential for liquefaction are those in which the water table is less than 50 feet below ground surface and the soils are predominately clean, poorly graded sand deposits of loose to medium-dense relative density.

The site is not located in a currently established State of California Seismic Hazard Zone for liquefaction. Based on the geologic conditions encountered at the site, including the lack of groundwater above 50 feet below ground surface, liquefa ction potential at the site is expected to be low during seismic events. Mitigation and specific design measures with respect to liquefaction are not necessary for the project.

5.4 Expansive Soil
Laboratory Plasticity Index (PI) and Expansion Index (EI) testing on near surf ace soil samples indicate low plasticity and corresponding lo w expansion potential (Appendix B). Therefore, mitigation and specific design measures with respect to expansive soil are not necessary.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 5 - November 11, 2024

5.5 Soil Corrosion Screening
We performed pH, resistivity, chloride, and sulfat e tests on one sample to generally evaluate the corrosion potential of the soil with respect to pr oposed subsurface structures. These tests were performed in accordance with California Test Method (CTM) Nos. 643, 422, and 417. The results are presented in Table 5.5A and should be considered for design of underground structures.

TABLE 5.5A

SOIL CORROSION PARAMETER TEST RESULTS
(CALIFORNIA TEST METHODS 643, 417, AND 422)
Sample No. Sample Depth
(ft.) pH
Minimum
Resistivity
(ohm-cm)
Chloride
(ppm)
Sulfate
(ppm)
B1-Bulk 0 – 5 7.1 2,680 8.4 13.2
Soil with a low pH (higher acidity) is considered corr osive as it can react with lime in cement to leach out soluble reaction products and result in a more porous and weaker concrete. Per Caltrans Corrosion Guidelines (Caltrans, 2021), soil with a pH of 5.5 or lower may be corrosive to concrete or steel in contact with the ground.

Soil resistivity is the measure of the soil’s ability to transmit electric current. Corrosion of buried ferrous metal is proportional to the resistivity of the soil. A lower resistivity indicates a higher propensity for transmitting electric currents that can cause corrosion of buried ferrous metal items. In general, the higher the resistivity, the lower the rate for corrosion. Per Caltrans Corrosion Guidelines (Caltrans, 2021), resistivity serves as an indicator parameter for the possible presence of soluble salts and it is not included as a paramete r to define a corrosive area for structures. A minimum resistivity value for soil less than 1,100 ohm-cm may indicate th e presence of high quantities of soluble salts and a higher propensity for corrosion.

Based on the laboratory minimum resistivity test re sults and Caltrans criteria, soil at the locations tested does not have a higher propensity for corrosion.

Table 5.5B presents a summary of concrete re quirements set forth by the California Building Code (CBC) Section 1904 and American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318 for possib le chloride exposure.

Chlorides can break down the protective oxide layer on steel surfaces resulting in corrosion. Sources of chloride include, but are not limited to, deicin g chemicals, salt, brackish water, seawater, or spray from these sources.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 6 - November 11, 2024
TABLE 5.5B

REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO

CHLORIDE-CONTAINING SOLUTIONS
(AFTER ACI 318 TABLES 19.3.1.1 and 19.3.2.1)
Chloride
Severity
Exposure
Class Condition
Maximum Water to
Cement Ratio
by Weight
Minimum
Compressive
Strength (psi)
Not
Applicable C0 Concrete dry or protected from
moisture N/A 2,500
Moderate C1 Concrete exposed to moisture but not
to external sources of chlorides N/A 2,500
Severe C2 Concrete exposed to moisture and an
external source of chlorides 0.40 5,000
The appropriate Chloride Severity/Exposure Class should be determined by the project designer based on the specific conditions at the location of the proposed structure. Further guidance is provided in ACI 318. Per Caltrans Corrosion Guidelines, soil with a chloride concentration of 500 ppm or higher may be corrosive to steel structures or steel reinforcement in concrete. Based on Caltrans criteria, soil at the locations tested is not corrosive with respect to chloride content.

Table 5.5C presents a summary of concrete requ irements set forth by CBC Section 1904 and ACI 318 for sulfate exposure. Similar to chlo rides, sulfates can break down the protective oxide layer on steel leading to corrosion. Sulfates can also react with lime in cement to soften and crack concrete.

TABLE 5.5C

REQUIREMENTS FOR CONCRETE EXPOSED TO

SULFATE-CONTAINING SOLUTIONS
(AFTER ACI 318 TABLES 19.3.1.1 and 19.3.2.1)
Sulfate
Severity
Exposure
Class
Water-Soluble Sulfate
(SO4) Content Cement
Type
(ASTM
C 150)
Maximum
Water to
Cement
Ratio by
Weight1
Minimum
Compressive
Strength (psi) Percent By
Mass
Parts Per Million
(ppm)
Not
Applicable S0 SO 4 < 0.10 SO 4 < 1,000 No Type
Restriction N/A 2,500
Moderate S1 0.10 < SO4 <

0.20 1,000 < SO4 < 2,000 II 0.50 4,000
Severe S2 0.20 < SO4 <

2.00 2,000 < SO4 <
20,000 V 0.45 4,500
Very
Severe S3 SO 4 > 2.00 SO 4 > 20,000 V+Pozzolan
or Slag 0.45 4,500
Notes:

1. Maximum water to cement ratio limits are different for lightweight concrete, see ACI 318 for details.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 7 - November 11, 2024
Based on the laboratory test results, the Sulfate Se verity is classified as “Not Applicable” and the Exposure Class is S0. The concrete mix design(s) sh ould be developed accordingly. The presence of water-soluble sulfates is not a visually discernibl e characteristic; therefore, other soil samples from the site could yield different concentrations. Additi onally, over time, landscaping activities (i.e., the addition of fertilizers and other soil nutrients) may affect the concentration.

Geocon does not practice in the field of corrosion engineering and the above information is provided as screening criteria only. If corrosion sensitive improvements are planned, we recommend that further evaluations by a corrosion engineer be performed to incorporate the necessary precautions to avoid premature corrosion on buried metal pipes and metal or concrete structures in direct contact with the soils.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 8 - November 11, 2024

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 General

6.1.1 No soil or geologic conditions were en countered during our investigation that would preclude development of the site as planned, provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of the project.

6.1.2 Conclusions and recommenda tions provided in this report are based on our review of referenced literature, analysis of data obtained from our field exploration program, laboratory testing program, and our understanding of the proposed development at this time.

6.1.3 We should review the pr oject plans as they develop further, provide engineering consultation as needed during final design, and perform geotechnical observation and testing services during construction.

6.2 Seismic Site Class / Seismic Design Criteria

6.2.1 Seismic design of the structures should be performed in accordance with the provisions of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) which is based on the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)/Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) publication: ASCE/SEI 7-16, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI, 2017).

We used the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) web application Seismic Design Maps (https://seismicmaps.org/) to evaluate site-specific seismic design parameters in accordance with ASCE 7-16.

For seismic design purposes, sites are classified as Site Class “A” through “F” as follows:
• Site Class A – Hard Rock;
• Site Class B – Rock;
• Site Class C – Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock;
• Site Class D – Stiff Soil;
• Site Class E – Soft Clay Soil; and
• Site Class F – Soils Requiring Site Response Analysis.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 9 - November 11, 2024
Based on the subsurface conditions at the site and measured penetration resistance in our borings, the Site Classification is Site Cl ass “C – Very Dense Soil and Soft Rock” per Table 20.3-1 of ASCE/SEI 7-16. For the purposes of evaluating code-based seismic parameters for design, we assumed a seismic Ri sk Category I or II (per the CBC) for the project. Results are summarized in Table 6.2.1.

TABLE 6.2.1
ASCE 7-16 SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
SITE CLASS “C” – VERY DENSE SOIL AND SOFT ROCK
Parameter Value ASCE 7-16 Reference
MCER Ground Motion Spectral Response
Acceleration – Class B (short), SS 0.472g Figure 22-1
MCER Ground Motion Spectral Response
Acceleration – Class B (1 sec), S1 0.23g Figure 22-2
Site Coefficient, FA 1.3 Table 11.4-1
Site Coefficient, FV 1.5 Table 11.4-2
Site Class Modified MCER Spectral Response
Acceleration (short), SMS 0.613g Eq. 11.4-1
Site Class Modified MCER Spectral Response
Acceleration (1 sec), SM1 0.345g* Eq. 11.4-2
5% Damped Design
Spectral Response Acceleration (short), SDS 0.409g Eq. 11.4-3 5% Damped Design
Spectral Response Acceleration (1 sec), SD1 0.23g* Eq. 11.4-4

6.2.2 Table 6.2.2 presents additional seismic design parameters for projects with Seismic Design Categories of D through F in accordance with ASCE 7-16 for the mapped maximum considered geometric mean (MCE
G).

TABLE 6.2.2
ASCE 7-16 SITE ACCELERATION DESIGN PARAMETERS
Parameter Value ASCE 7-16 Reference
Mapped MCEG Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA 0.2g Figure 22-7 Site Coefficient, FPGA 1.2 Table 11.8-1
Site Class Modified MCEG Peak Ground
Acceleration, PGAM 0.24g Section 11.8.3 (Eq. 11.8-1)

6.2.3 Conformance to the criteria presented in Tables 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 for seismic design does not constitute any kind of guarantee or assura nce that significant structural damage or ground failure will not occur if a maximum level earthquake occurs. The primary goal of seismic design is to protect life and not to avoid structural damage, since such design may be economically prohibitive.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 10 - November 11, 2024

6.3 Soil Excavation Characteristics

6.3.1 In our opinion, grading and excavations at the site may be accomplished with standard to moderate effort using heavy-duty grading/ex cavation equipment. We do not anticipate project excavations to generate oversized rock material (greater than 6 inches in dimension) or boulders.

6.3.2 Temporary excavation slopes must meet Cal- OSHA requirements as appropriate. Excavation sloping, benching, the use of trench shields, and the placement of trench spoils should conform to the latest applicable Cal-OSHA standards. The contractor should have a Cal-OSHA-approved “competent person” onsite during excavation to evaluate trench conditions and to make appropriate recommendations where necessary. It is the contractor’s responsibility to provide sufficient and safe excavation support as well as protecting nearby utilities, structures, and other improvements which may be damaged by earth movements.

6.3.3 The excavation support recommendations pr ovided by Cal-OSHA are generally geared towards protecting human life and not necessar ily towards preventing damage to nearby structures or surface improvements. The cont ractor should be responsible for using the proper active shoring systems or sloping to prevent damage to any structure or improvements near underground excavations.

6.3.4 Permanent cut and fill slopes should be co nstructed no steeper than 2H:1V (horizontal to vertical). To mitigate potential erosion, slopes should be vegetated as soon as possible and surface drainage should be directed away from the tops of slopes.

6.3.5 If grading occurs during or after the wet season (typically winter and spring), or in periods of precipitation, in-place a nd excavated soils will likely be wet. Earthwork contractors should be aware of moisture sensitivity of the near-surface granul ar soils and potential compaction/workability difficulties.

6.3.6 Earthwork and pad preparation operations in these conditions will likely be difficult with low productivity. Often, a period of at least one month of warm and dry we ather is necessary to allow the site to dry sufficiently so that heavy grading equipment can operate effectively.

6.3.7 Based on laboratory testing, in-situ moisture content of site soils ranges from approximately 6% to 26% which is higher than optimum moisture content, which is approximately 14%. Due to the fine-grained nature of the soils and measured in-situ moisture contents above optimum, additional drying efforts to attain moisture contents For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 11 - November 11, 2024 suitable for compaction should be anticipated regardless of the time of year. Mitigation alternatives may include aerating/drying the exposed soils (assuming favorable weather conditions), or chemical treatment (e.g., lime treatment). Unstable excavation bottoms may require overexcavating 12 to 18 inches and placing geotextile fabric/g eogrid covered with aggregate, for stabilization. We can provide specific recommendations during construction, based on conditions encountered.

6.4 Materials for Fill

6.4.1 Excavated soils generated from cut operations at the site are suitable for use as fill in structural areas, provided they do not contain deleterious matter, organic material, or cementations larger than 6 inches in maximu m dimension. Due to high in-situ moisture content, native soils reused as engineered fill will likely require aerating/drying to attain suitable moisture content for compaction, regardless of the time of year.

6.4.2 Import soil for general use (if needed) should be similar to onsite, native soils (e.g., similar plasticity and grain size distribution characteri stics). Import soil should be free of organic material and construction debris, and should not contain rock/cementations larger than 6 inches in greatest dimension.

6.4.3 Environmental characteristics and corrosion potential of import soil materials should also be considered. Proposed import materials should be sampled, tested, and approved by Geocon prior to its transportation to the site.

6.5 Grading

6.5.1 All earthwork operations should be observed and all fills tested for recommended compaction and moisture content by a representative of Geocon.

6.5.2 All references to relative compaction a nd optimum moisture content in this report are based on the latest ASTM D1557 Test Procedure. Structural areas should be considered the areas extending a minimum of 5 feet beyond the outside dimensions of structures, including footings or overhangs carrying structural loads.

6.5.3 Prior to commencing grading, a pre-constr uction conference with representatives of the client, grading contractor and Geocon should be held at the site. Site preparation, soil handling and/or the grading plans should be discussed at the pre-construction conference.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 12 - November 11, 2024

6.5.4 Site preparation should begin with removal of existing underground utilities, organic-rich topsoil, and debris. Excavations or depressions resulting from site clearing operations, or other existing excavations or depressions, sh ould be restored with engineered fill in accordance with the recommendations of this report.

6.5.5 At the time of our investig ation, site vegetation primarily consisted of a light growth of annual grasses. Existing trees and associated root systems within proposed development areas should be removed. Surface vegetation consisting of grasses and other similar vegetation should be removed by stripping to a sufficient depth to remove organic-rich topsoil. We estimate required stripping depths will range from approximately 2 to 3 inches.

The actual stripping depth should be determined based on site conditions prior to grading.

Material generated during stripping is not suitable for use within 5 feet of building pads or within pavement areas but may be placed in landscaped or non-structural areas or exported from the site.

6.5.6 Excavations or depression s resulting from site clearing operations, or other existing excavations or depressions, shou ld be restored with engineered fill in accord ance with the recommendations of this report.

6.5.7 After site preparation, exposed soil should be scarified 12 inches, uniformly moisture- conditioned at or above optimum moisture cont ent and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Scarification and recompaction operations should be performed in the presence of a Geocon representative to evaluate performance of the subgrade under compaction equipment loading and to identify any loose or unstable soil conditions that could require additional excavation.

6.5.8 Engineered fill consisting of onsite native sources and/or import fill material should be compacted in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches (loose thickness) and brought to final subgrade elevations. Each lift should be mois ture-conditioned at or above optimum and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction.

6.5.9 The top 6 inches of final vehicular pavement and concrete flatwork subgrade, whether completed at-grade, by excavation, or by filli ng, should be uniformly moisture-conditioned at or above optimum moisture content, compacted to at least 95% relative compaction and be stable. The 95% relative compaction re quirement applies to the top 6 inches of pavement area subgrade; however, underlying materials must be sufficiently compacted and stable. We recommend proof-rolling the subgrade with a loaded water truck (or similar For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 13 - November 11, 2024 equipment with high contact pressure) to veri fy the stability of the subgrade prior to placing aggregate base (AB). We note that deep er scarification, moisture-conditioning, and compaction efforts may be required in order to achieve overall stability and compaction.

6.5.10 Underground utility trenches within structural areas should be backfilled with properly compacted material. Pipe bedding, shading, and trench backfill should conform to the requirements of the appropriate utility authority. Material excavated from trenches should be adequate for use as general backfill above shading, provided it does not contain deleterious matter, vegetation, or cementations larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension. Trench backfill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches, moisture-conditioned at or above optimum, and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Compaction should be performed by mechanical means only; jetting of trench backfill is not recommended.

6.6 Foundations – Shade Structure and Security Lighting

6.6.1 Proposed shade structure foundations and security lighting may consist of CIDH concrete piers. CIDH piers should have a minimum diameter of 12 inches, a minimum embedment depth of 6 feet, and be designed using an a llowable unit skin friction of 450 pounds per square foot (psf) to resist vertical downward loads. An allowable unit skin friction of 300 psf plus the weight of the pier may be used to resist uplift loads. The allowable downward capacity and allowable uplift capacity may be increased by one-third when considering transient wind or seismic loads. Piers should have a minimum center-to-center spacing of at least three pier diameters.

6.6.2 Allowable passive pressure used to resist lateral movement of the piers may be assumed to be equal to a fluid weighing 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) with a maximum earth pressure of 3,500 psf. The allowable passive pressure may be applied over two pier diameters for isolated piers with a minimum center-to-center spacing of at least three pier diameters. The allowable passive pressure assumes a horizontal surface extending at least 5 feet or three times the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever is greater. The upper 1 foot should not be included in the design for lateral resistance.

6.6.3 Although drilling refusal was not encounter ed in our borings, we did encounter sampler refusal (blow counts greater than 50 blow per foot) in variably cemented soils throughout the site. These soils may exhibit moderate resistance when excavating drilled piers.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 14 - November 11, 2024

6.6.4 The bottom of pier excavations should be cleaned of loose cuttings prior to the placement of steel and concrete. Experience indicates th at backspinning the auger does not remove loose material, and a flat cleanout plate is necessary.

6.6.5 Suction effects created during auger withdrawal from the piers (during construction) can induce caving in fine-grained/clay soils. The contractor should be aware and prepared to mitigate for these potential caving conditions during construction.

6.6.6 If seepage or groundwater is encountered, water should be pumped from the pier excavation prior to placement of concrete.

6.6.7 A Geocon representative should be present during pier drilling to confirm that subsurface conditions encountered are consistent with those expected. If unexpected conditions are encountered, foundation modifications may be required.

6.7 Foundations – Restroom Building

6.7.1 Provided the building pad area is graded in accordance with the recommendations of this report, the proposed building may be supported on conventional shallow foundations bearing on undisturbed alluvial soil or engineered fill.

6.7.2 To reduce potential for seasonal moistu re variations beneath the building, foundations should consist of continuous perimeter footings with isolated interior spread footings or continuous footings. Perimeter footings should be continuous around the entire perimeter of the structure without breaks or discontinuities. Strip footings should be at least 12 inches wide and spread footings shou ld be at least 18 inches square. All footings should be embedded at least 12 inches below lowest adjacent pad grade.

6.7.3 Underground utilities running parallel to footi ngs should not be constructed in the zone of influence of footings. The zone of influence may be taken to be the area within 18 inches laterally of the footing, beneath the footing, and within a 1:1 plane extending out and down from the bottom of the footing.

6.7.4 Foundations proportioned as recommended ab ove may be designed using an allowable soil bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead plus live loads. This value may be increased by one-third to evaluate all loads, including wind or seismic forces.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 15 - November 11, 2024

6.7.5 Foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations above should experience total settlements of less than 1 inch and differential settlements of approximately ½ inch over a distance of approximately 30 feet. The majority of the settlement will be immediate and will occur as the loads are applied during construction.

6.7.6 Allowable passive pressure used to resist lateral movement of footings may be assumed to be equal to a fluid weighing 350 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). The allowable coefficient of friction to resist sliding of footings is 0. 35 for concrete against soil. Combined passive resistance and friction may be utilized for footing design provided that the frictional resistance is reduced by 50%.

6.7.7 Continuous footings should be reinforced with at least two No. 4 reinforcement bars, one each placed near the top and bottom of the foot ing to allow footings to span isolated soil irregularities. The reinforcement recommended ab ove is for soil characteristics only and is not intended to replace reinforcement required for structural considerations. The project structural engineer should evaluate the need for additional reinforcement.

6.7.8 A Geocon representative should observ e foundation excavations prior to placing reinforcing steel or concrete to observe th at the exposed soil conditions are consistent with those anticipated. If unanticipated soil conditions are encountered, foundation modifications may be required.

6.8 Interior Slabs-on-Grade

6.8.1 Slab thickness and reinforc ement should be determined by the structural engineer based on anticipated loading. However, at a minimum, slabs should be at le ast 4 inches thick and reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars placed 24 inches on center, each way. Structural requirements may require additional reinforcement or thicker concrete slabs.

6.8.2 If the near-surface soils of building pads become dry prior to constructing concrete slabs-on-grade, building pads should be re-moi stened by soaking or sprinkling such that the upper 12 inches of soil is at or above optimum moisture content at least 48 hours before concrete placement.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 16 - November 11, 2024

6.9 Slab-on-Grade Moisture Protection Considerations

6.9.1 Migration of moisture through concrete slabs or moisture otherwise released from slabs is not a geotechnical issue. However, for the convenience of the owner and design team, we are providing the following general suggestions for consideration by the owner, architect, structural engineer, and contractor. The suggested procedures may reduce the potential for moisture-related floor covering failures on conc rete slabs-on-grade, but moisture problems may still occur even if the procedures are fo llowed. If more detailed recommendations are desired, we recommend consulting a specialist in this field.

6.9.2 In areas where floor coverings are planned, a minimum 10-mil-thick vapor barrier meeting ASTM E1745-97 Class C requirements may be placed directly below the slab, without a sand cushion provided the slab-on-grade concrete water-cement ratio is 0.45 or less. To reduce the potential for punctures, a higher quality vapor barrier (15 mil, Class A or B) may be used. The vapor barrier, if used, should extend to the edges of the slab and should be sealed at all seams and penetrations.

6.9.3 At least 4 inches of ½- or ¾-inch crushe d rock, with no more than 5 percent passing the No. 200 sieve, may be placed below the vapor barrier to serve as a capillary break.

6.9.4 The concrete water/cement ratio should be as low as possible. The water/cement ratio should not exceed 0.45 for concrete placed directly on the vapor barrier. Midrange plasticizers could be used to facilitate concrete placement and workability.

6.9.5 Proper finishing, curing, and moisture vap or emission testing sh ould be performed in accordance with the latest guidelines provid ed by the American Concrete Institute, Portland Cement Association, and ASTM.

6.10 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement

6.10.1 We performed Resistance-Value (R-Value) te sting on a representative bulk soil sample from the proposed pavement areas. Our testing re sulted in an R-Value of 26 (Appendix B).

Table 6.10.1 provides alternative pavement sections based on the design methods of Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual using a design subgrade R-value of 20.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 17 - November 11, 2024 TABLE 6.10.1

FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT SECTIONS
Parking Areas
Traffic Index = 5.0
Driveways, Light Truck Traffic,
Fire Truck Areas
Traffic Index = 6.0
HMA, inches 3 4
AB, inches 7 8.5
Total Section, inches 10 12.5

6.10.2 The recommended pavement section is based on the following assumptions:

1. Pavement subgrade soil has an R-Value of at least 20.

2. Class 2 AB has a minimum R-Value of 78 and meets the requirements of Section 26 of Caltrans’ Standard Specifications.

3. Class 2 AB and the top 6 inches of subgrade are compacted to 95% or higher relative compaction at or near optimum moisture content.

4. Pavement subgrade should be compacted in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report.

5. HMA should conform to Section 39 of Caltrans’ latest Standard Specifications.

6. Periodic maintenance of HMA pavements is performed.

6.10.3 To reduce the potential for water from land scaped areas migrating under pavement into the AB, consideration should be given to using full-depth curbs in areas where pavement abuts irrigated landscaping. The full-depth curbs should extend at least 6 inches or more into the soil subgrade beneath the AB. Alternatively, modified drop-inlets that contain weep-holes may be used to encourage accumulated water to drain from beneath the pavement.

6.10.4 Asphalt pavement section recommendation s for driveways and parking areas are based on the design procedures of Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual (Design Manual), Chapter 600.

It should be noted that most rational pavement design procedures are based on projected street or highway traffic conditions and, hence, may not be representative of vehicular loading that occurs in parking lots and driveways. Pavement proximity to landscape irrigation, reduced traffic speed and short turning radii increase the potential for pavement distress to occur in parking lots even though the volume of traffic is significantly less than that of an adjacent street. The Design Manual indicates that the resulting pavement sections for parking lots are "minimized to keep initial costs down but are reasonable because additional AC surfacing can be added later, if needed, and generally without incurring traffic hazards or traffic handling problems." It is generally not economically feasible to design and construct the entire parking lot and driveways for the unique loading conditions previously described.

Periodic maintenance of the pavement in these areas, therefore, should be anticipated.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 18 - November 11, 2024

6.11 Rigid Concrete Pavement

6.11.1 If rigid PCC pavement is used in automobile/light-truck traffic areas and in front of trash bin areas, we recommend that the concrete be at least 6 inches thick. PCC pavement should be underlain by at least 6 inches of Class 2 AB meeting the requirements of Section 26 of Caltrans’ Standard Specifications and compacted to at least 95% relative compaction.

Subgrade soils should be prepared and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of this report.

6.11.2 Subgrade soils should be prepared and compacted in accordance with the recommendations of this report. Subgrade should be finished to a smooth, unyielding surface and proof-rolled with a loaded water truck to verify stability.

6.11.3 PCC should have a mini mum 28-day compressive strength of 3,500 pounds per square inch (psi). Adequate construction and crack control joints should be used to control cracking inherent in concrete construction. We note that the American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) recommends a maximum joint spacing no greater than 24X the slab thickness for PCC pavements directly underlain by granular bases.

6.11.4 Steel reinforcement, if used, should be de tailed in accordance with PCA, ACI, or similar guidelines. Alternatively, macro synthetic fibers (Euclid Chemical Tuf-Strand SF or equivalent) mixed into the concrete mix may be considered in lieu of conventional steel reinforcement provided they meet the re quirements of ASTM C1116 and ASTM D7508 for Type III Synthetic Fibers.

6.11.5 Adequate dowels should also be used at jo ints to facilitate load transfer and reduce vertical offset. In addition, the recommendations in Section 6.10.3 pertaining to deepened curbs, moisture cut-offs, and subsurface drainage apply to concrete pavements, sidewalks and flatwork, as well as asphalt pavements.

6.11.6 In general, we recommend that concrete p avements be detailed, designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with industry standards such as those provided by the ACI and ACPA.

6.12 Site Drainage and Moisture Protection

6.12.1 Adequate site drainage is critical to reduce the potential for differential soil movement, soil expansion, erosion, and subs urface seepage. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to pond adjacent to building foundations. The site should be graded and For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 19 - November 11, 2024 maintained such that surface drainage is direct ed away from structures in accordance with the 2019 CBC or other applicable standards. In addition, surface drainage should be directed away from the top of slopes into swales or other controlled drainage devices.

6.12.2 Underground utilities should be leak free. Utility and irrigation lines should be checked periodically for leaks and detected leaks should be repaired promptly. Detrimental soil movement could occur if water is allowed to infiltrate the soil for prolonged periods of time.

6.12.3 We recommend implementing measures to reduce infiltrating i rrigation water near buildings, flatwork, or pavements. Such measures may include:
• Selecting drought-tolerant plants that require little or no irrigation, especially within 3 feet of buildings, slabs-on-grade, or pavements;
• Using drip irrigation or low-output sprinklers;
• Using automatic timers for irrigation systems; or
• Using appropriately spaced area drains.

The project landscape architect should cons ider incorporating these measures into the landscaping plans.

6.12.4 Experience has shown that even with these provisions, subsurface seepage may develop in areas where no such water conditions existed prio r to site development. This is particularly true where a substantial increase in surface wate r infiltration has resulted from an increase in landscape irrigation.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 20 - November 11, 2024

7.0 FURTHER GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES

7.1 Plan and Specification Review

7.1.1 We should review the founda tion and grading plans prior to final design submittal to assess whether our recommendations have been properly incorporated and evaluate if additional analysis and/or recommendations are required.

7.2 Testing and Observation Services

7.2.1 The recommendations provided in this report are based on the assumption that we will continue as Geotechnical Engineer of Reco rd throughout the construction phase and provide construction observation and testing services. Providing these services during construction are important in order to maintain continuity of geotechnical interpretation and confirm that field conditions encountered during construction are similar to those anticipated during design. Testing and observation services by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record are necessary to verify that construc tion has been performed in accordance with this report, approved plans, and specifications. If we are not retained for these services, we cannot assume any responsibility for other’s interpretation of our recommendations or the future performance of the project.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 21 - November 11, 2024

8.0 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS
The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that anticipated here in, we should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given.

This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or their representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the design team for the project a nd incorporated into the plans and specifications and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.

The recommendations contained in this report are preliminary until verified during construction by representatives of our firm. Change s in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties.

Additionally, changes in applicable or appropriat e standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated partially or wholly by changes outs ide our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years.

Our professional services were performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with gene rally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices used in the site area at this time. No warranty is provided, express or implied.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 - 22 - November 11, 2024

9.0 REFERENCES

1. American Concrete Institute, ACI 318-14, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, 2014.

2. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 7-16 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2017.

3. California Building St andards Commission, 2019 California Building Code , based on 2018 International Building Code, International Code Council.

4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Corrosion Guidelines (Version 3.0), March 2018.

5. California Geological Survey, Preliminary Geologic Map of the Sacramento 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, California, 2011.

6. Caltrans, Standard Specifications, Section 26, 2018.

7. Hart, Earl W., Bryant, William A. “Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Program.” California Division of Mines and Geology, 1999.

8. Jennings, C.W. (compiler), Fault Map of California , California Division of Mines and Geology, 1982.

9. Portland Cement Association, Concrete Floors on Ground, 2001.

10. Structural Engineers Association of California (S EAOC) and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), Seismic Design Maps , https://seismicmaps.org/, accessed October 26, 2022.

11. United States Geological Survey (USGS), Unified Hazard Tool https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/.

12. USGS and California Geological Survey, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed October 26, 2022, at: https://www. usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake- hazards/faults.

13. Unpublished reports, aerial photographs, and maps on file with Geocon.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

PROJECT
SITE

ROSEVILLE
South BranchPleasantGroveCreek
Kaseberg Creek
DryCreek
Curry Creek
Plea
sant Grove Creek
BOB

DOYLE DR

TIMBERROSE WAY
UPLAND
DR
N

HAYDEN PKWY
W

ALERGA RD

SOLAIRE DR
PFE RD

JUNCTI ON B LVD

WATT AVE

GARLANDWAY

OPAL D R

FIDDYMENTRD A N GU S
R
D

ATW ELL STS I ERRA VI L LAGE DR

EARL RU S H DR MARKETST
W
ESTPAR
K DR

PLEAS ANT GROVE BLVD

BASELINE RD

PAR KSIDE WAY
SUN

CITY BLVD
DEL
W
EBB
BLVD

HAYDEN P KW Y

VI S TA GRANDE BLVD

PETTIGREW
RD

DYER L N

BLUE OAKS BLVD
W

OODCREEK
OAKS
BLVD
W

ESTBROOKBLVD

PALLADAY RD

CENTRAL AVE

NI C O LE GEE DR

PHILLIP RD

SANTUCCIBLVD

VINEYARD RD

S BREWER RD

COUNTRY ACRES LN
CONSULTANTS, INC.
3 1 6 0 GO L D VA L L E Y D R - S U I T E 8 0 0 - R A N C H O C O R D O VA, C A 9 5 7 4 2 P HO N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 1 8 - FAX 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2 Figure 1November 2024S2759-05-01

VICINITY MAP
Sierra Village Drive
Roseville, California
City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
GEOCON 6/25/2024 USER Brown M PATH C:\Users\Brown M\OneDrive - Geocon, Inc\GIS_Graphics\Projects\S2759-05-01_KT-52_Park_GI\01_ReportMaps\Figure_1_Vicinity_Map.mxd 0 1
Scale in Miles
N

SACRAMENTO
SAN

FRANCISCO

LOS ANGELES

SAN DIEGO

PROJECT

LOCATION

REDDING

BAKERSFIELD
FRESNO
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

HIMALAYA WAY

SIERRA VILLAGE DR

FANDANGO LOOP

SIERRA MORENA WAY
SILVER
SPRUCE
DR

MINUET WAY

HALIFAX WAY

MERENGUE CT

GORGON WAY

PANAMINT WAY
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
Bulk 1
CONSULTANTS, INC.

GEOCON 6/25/2024 USER Brown M PATH C:\Users\Brown M\OneDrive - Geocon, Inc\GIS_Graphics\Projects\S2759-05-01_KT-52_Park_GI\01_ReportMaps\Figure_2_Site_Plan.mxd 0 100
Scale in Feet
3 1 6 0 GO L D VA L L E Y D R - S U I T E 8 0 0 - R A N C H O C O R D O VA , C A 9 5 7 4 2 P HO N E 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 1 8 - FA X 9 1 6 . 8 5 2 . 9 1 3 2 Figure 2S2759-05-01

SITE PLAN
Sierra Village Drive
Roseville, California
City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Legend
Approximate Boring Location
Approximate Bulk Sample Location
Approximate Site Boundary
B5
Bulk 1
November 2024
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
B5
Bulk 1
!?S
!?S
!?S
!?S
!?S
$T

HIMALAYA WAY

SIERRA VILLAGE DR

FANDANGO LOOP

SIERRA MORENA WAY
SILVER
SPRUCE
DR

MINUET WAY

HALIFAX WAY

MERENGUE CT

GORGON WAY

PANAMINT WAY
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
Bulk 1
CONSULTANTS, INC.

GEOCON 6/25/2024 USER Brown M PATH C:\Users\Brown M\OneDrive - Geocon, Inc\GIS_Graphics\Projects\S2759-05-01_KT-52_Park_GI\01_ReportMaps\Figure_3_Proposed_Development_Plan.mxd 0 100
Scale in Feet
!(¹
N
3160 GOLD VALLEY DR - SUITE 800 - RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95742 PHONE 916.852.9118 - FAX 916.852.9132
Figure 3S2759-05-01

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Sierra Village Drive
Roseville, California
City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Legend
!?S Approximate Boring Location
$T Approximate Bulk Sample Location
Approximate Site Boundary
Proposed Development Plan by City of Roseville Parks, Recreation and Libraries November 2024
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

APPENDIX A
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation

Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 November 11, 2024

APPENDIX A

FIELD EXPLORATION
We performed our geotechnical field exploration on May 23, 2024. Our field exploration program consisted of drilling eight (5) exploratory borings (B1 through B5) at the approximate locations depicted on the Site Plan, Figure 2 and Proposed Development Plan, Figure 3.

Borings were performed using a truck-mounted CME 75 drill rig equipped with 8-inch outside diameter (OD) hollow-stem and 6-inch diameter solid-flight augers. Soil sampling was performed using an automatic 140-pound hammer with a 30-inch drop. We obtained samples using a 3-inch OD split-spoon (California Modified) sampler and a 2-½ inch OD Standard Penetrat ion Test (SPT) sampler.

We recorded the number of blows required to dr ive the sampler the last 12 inches (or portion thereof) of the 18-inch sampling interval on th e boring logs. Upon completion, the borings were backfilled with neat cement grout.

We visually examined, classified, and logged the subsurface conditions in the exploratory borings in general accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Ma nual Procedure D2488-90). This system uses the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) for soil designations. The logs depict soil and geologic conditions encountered and depths at which we obtained samples. The logs also include our interpretation of the conditions between sampling intervals. Therefore, the logs contain both observed and interpreted data. We determined th e lines designating the interface between soil materials on the logs using visual observations, drill rig penetration rates, excavation characteristics, and other factors. The transition between materials may be abrupt or gradual.

Where applicable, we revised the field logs base d on subsequent laboratory testing. Logs of exploratory borings are presented herein.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
COMPACTION CURVE (ASTM D1557)
CORROSION ANALYSIS (CTM 422, 643, 417)
DIRECT SHEAR (ASTM D3080)
EXPANSION INDEX (ASTM D4829)
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422)
MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D2216)
PLASTICITY INDEX (ASTM D4318)

LABORATORY TEST KEY
CP –
CR –
DS –
EI –
GSA –
MC –
PI –
R-VALUE (CTM 301)
SAND EQUIVALENT (CTM 217)

CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED
TRIAXIAL (ASTM D4767)

UNCONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED
TRIAXIAL (ASTM D2850)
R –
SE –
TXCU –
TXUU –

UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH (ASTM D2166)
UC –
KEY TO LOGS Figure A1
PHONE 916.852.9118 – FAX 916.852.9132
3160 GOLD VALLEY DR – SUITE 800 – RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95742 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
50/6"
50/6"
50/6"
75 50/6"

84.0 99.5
B1-Bulk
B1-1.5
B1-3.5
B1-8.0
B1-8.5
B1-10.5
B1-11.0
B1-15.5
B1-16.0

6.6 11.0
CL
ML
SM
ML
SM

ALLUVIUM
Hard, moist, brown, Sandy Lean CLAY with Silt, moderately cemented
brown to grayish brown, fine sand, strongly cemented
Hard, moist, grayish brown, Sandy SILT
sampler broke on cemented material
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND, moderately cemented, with calcification
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Sandy SILT, weakly
cemented, with calcification
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND
BORING TERMINATED AT 16.5 FEET

GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED

BACKFILLED WITH NEAT CEMENT GROUT
CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY
(P.C.F.)

MOISTURE

LITHOLOGY
IN PROGRESS S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ 07/01/24 (USCS)
LAH
... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE
CLASS

ADDITIONAL

DATE COMPLETEDDEPTH
CME 75
SAMPLE

INTERVAL
&

RECOVERY
V&W Drilling

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 SOIL

SAMPLE SYMBOLS
... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL
~108'
IN

HAMMER TYPE
FEET
Figure A2, Log of Boring, page 1 of 1
... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED)
... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE

DRILLER

PENETRATION

RESISTANCE
(BLOWS/FT.)
BORING B1
5/23/2024

GROUNDWATER
... CHUNK SAMPLE
... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
ENG./GEO.

ELEV. (MSL.)
TESTS
Automatic | 140lb
NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES.

PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01 PROJECT NAME Roseville KT-52 Park For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
50/6"
50/6"
50/6"
50/4"
50/4"
50/6"

79.9 86.8
B2-BULK
B2-1.5
B2-3.5
B2-5.5
B2-6.0
B2-8.0
B2-8.5
B2-10.5
B2-11.0
B2-15.5
B2-16.0

18.0 10.9
CL
ML
SM
ML
SM

ALLUVIUM
Hard, moist, brown, Sandy Lean CLAY with Silt, moderately cemented
grayish brown, moderately cemented
Hard, moist, grayish brown, Sandy SILT
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND, moderately cemented, with calcification
Hard, moist, grayish brown, Sandy SILT, moderately
cemented
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND, moderately cemented
BORING TERMINATED AT 16.5 FEET

GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED

BACKFILLED WITH NEAT CEMENT GROUT
CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY
(P.C.F.)

MOISTURE

LITHOLOGY
IN PROGRESS S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ 07/01/24 (USCS)
LAH
... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE
CLASS

ADDITIONAL

DATE COMPLETEDDEPTH
CME 75
SAMPLE

INTERVAL
&

RECOVERY
V&W Drilling

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 SOIL

SAMPLE SYMBOLS
... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL
~108'
IN

HAMMER TYPE
FEET
Figure A3, Log of Boring, page 1 of 1
... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED)
... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE

DRILLER

PENETRATION

RESISTANCE
(BLOWS/FT.)
BORING B2
5/23/2024

GROUNDWATER
... CHUNK SAMPLE
... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
ENG./GEO.

ELEV. (MSL.)
TESTS
Automatic | 140lb
NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES.

PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01 PROJECT NAME Roseville KT-52 Park For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
50/3"
50/6"
50/6"
50/6"
50/4"
50/6"
100.9

80.3 B3-1.5
B3-2.0
B3-3.5
B3-5.5
B3-8.0
B3-8.5
B3-10.5
B3-15.0

13.3 11.0

21.3 18.0
CL
ML
SM

ALLUVIUM
Hard, moist, brown, Sandy Lean CLAY with Silt, moderately cemented
no clay, strongly cemented
brown to grayish brown, strongly cemented, with calcification Hard, moist, grayish brown with iron oxide staining, Sandy SILT
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND, strongly cemented
fine to medium sand, weakly cemented
BORING TERMINATED AT 16.5 FEET

GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED

BACKFILLED WITH NEAT CEMENT GROUT
CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY
(P.C.F.)

MOISTURE

LITHOLOGY
IN PROGRESS S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ 07/01/24 (USCS)
LAH
... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE
CLASS

ADDITIONAL

DATE COMPLETEDDEPTH
CME 75
SAMPLE

INTERVAL
&

RECOVERY
V&W Drilling

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 SOIL

SAMPLE SYMBOLS
... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL
~108'
IN

HAMMER TYPE
FEET
Figure A4, Log of Boring, page 1 of 1
... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED)
... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE

DRILLER

PENETRATION

RESISTANCE
(BLOWS/FT.)
BORING B3
5/23/2024

GROUNDWATER
... CHUNK SAMPLE
... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
ENG./GEO.

ELEV. (MSL.)
TESTS
Automatic | 140lb
NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES.

PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01 PROJECT NAME Roseville KT-52 Park For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
56 50/6"
50/4"
50/6"
50/6"
50/6"
110.2

97.1 79.8

83.3 B4-Bulk
B4-1.5
B4-2.0
B4-3.5
B4-4.0
B4-5.5
B4-6.0
B4-8.0
B4-8.5
B4-10.5
B4-11.0
B4-15.5
B4-16.0

17.2 18.5

26.6 22.1
CL
ML
SM
ML

ALLUVIUM
Hard, moist, brown, Sandy Lean CLAY with Silt, with
cemented pieces
moderately to strongly cemented
grayish brown, with calcification
Hard, moist, grayish brown, Sandy SILT
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND, moderately cemented
Hard, moist, grayish brown with iron oxide staining and black mottling, Sandy SILT
BORING TERMINATED AT 16.5 FEET

GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED

BACKFILLED WITH NEAT CEMENT GROUT
CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY
(P.C.F.)

MOISTURE

LITHOLOGY
IN PROGRESS S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ 07/01/24 (USCS)
LAH
... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE
CLASS

ADDITIONAL

DATE COMPLETEDDEPTH
CME 75
SAMPLE

INTERVAL
&

RECOVERY
V&W Drilling

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 SOIL

SAMPLE SYMBOLS
... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL
~110'
IN

HAMMER TYPE
FEET
Figure A5, Log of Boring, page 1 of 1
... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED)
... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE

DRILLER

PENETRATION

RESISTANCE
(BLOWS/FT.)
BORING B4
5/23/2024

GROUNDWATER
... CHUNK SAMPLE
... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
ENG./GEO.

ELEV. (MSL.)
TESTS
Automatic | 140lb
NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES.

PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01 PROJECT NAME Roseville KT-52 Park For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
50/6"
50/6"
50/3"
50/6"
65 50/6"

86.2 84.6
B5-1.5
B5-3.5
B5-5.5
B5-6.0
B5-8.0
B5-8.5
B5-10.5
B5-11.0
B5-15.5

23.0 22.4
CL
ML
SM
ML

ALLUVIUM
Hard, moist, brown, Sandy Lean CLAY with Silt, moderately cemented
fine sand
Hard, moist, grayish brown with iron oxide staining, Sandy SILT, moderately cemented
Very dense, moist, grayish brown, Silty fine SAND
Hard, moist, grayish brown with iron oxide staining, Sandy SILT, with calcification
grayish brown with iron oxide staining and black mottling, moderately to strongly cemented
BORING TERMINATED AT 16.5 FEET

GROUNDWATER NOT ENCOUNTERED

BACKFILLED WITH NEAT CEMENT GROUT
CONTENT (%)

DRY DENSITY
(P.C.F.)

MOISTURE

LITHOLOGY
IN PROGRESS S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ 07/01/24 (USCS)
LAH
... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE
CLASS

ADDITIONAL

DATE COMPLETEDDEPTH
CME 75
SAMPLE

INTERVAL
&

RECOVERY
V&W Drilling

EQUIPMENT

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 SOIL

SAMPLE SYMBOLS
... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL
~108'
IN

HAMMER TYPE
FEET
Figure A6, Log of Boring, page 1 of 1
... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED)
... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE

DRILLER

PENETRATION

RESISTANCE
(BLOWS/FT.)
BORING B5
5/23/2024

GROUNDWATER
... CHUNK SAMPLE
... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
ENG./GEO.

ELEV. (MSL.)
TESTS
Automatic | 140lb
NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES.

PROJECT NO. S2759-05-01 PROJECT NAME Roseville KT-52 Park For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

APPENDIX B
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
City of Roseville KT-52 Park Construction
Geotechnical Investigation
Geocon Project No. S2759-05-01 November 11, 2024

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other sugges ted procedures. Selected soil samples were tested for their in-place dry density and moisture content, plasticity characteristics, grain size distribution, fines content, corrosion potential, expansion potential, and R-Value. The results of the laboratory tests are presented on the following pages.

TABLE B1

EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS
ASTM D4829
Sample Number Depth (feet) Moisture Content (%) Expansion Index Classification* Before Test After Test
B4-Bulk 0 – 5 12.8 25.5 35 Low
*Expansion Potential Classification per ASTM D4829.

TABLE B2

R-VALUE TEST RESULTS
ASTM D2844
Sample Number Depth (feet) Soil Classification R-Value
B1-Bulk 0 – 3 Sandy Lean Clay with Silt 26
For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
B1-8.5 8.5 6.6 84.0
B1-11 11 11.0 99.5
B2-6 6 18.0 79.9
B2-8.5 8.5 10.9 86.8
B3-2 2 13.3 100.9
B3-3.5 3.5 11.0
B3-5.5 5.5 21.3
B3-8.5 8.5 18.0 80.3
B4-Bulk 0-5 28 19 9 35 62.3
B4-2 2 17.2 110.2
B4-4 4 18.5 97.1
B4-6 6 26.6 79.8
B4-8.5 8.5 22.1 83.3
B5-6 6 23.0 86.2
B5-8.5 8.5 22.4 84.6
Sheet 1 of 1
Summary of Laboratory Results
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Plasticity
Index
Plastic
Limit
Water
Content
(%)
Expansion
Index
Depth
(feet)
%<#200
SieveSample ID Liquid
Limit
Project: Roseville KT-52 Park
Location: Roseville, California
Number: S2759-05-01
Figure: B1
Geocon Consultants, Inc.
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Telephone: 916-852-9118
US LAB SUMMARY GEOTECH 2 WITH EI COLUMN S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ US_LAB.GDT 6/21/24 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 0 20 40 60 80 100
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Plasticity
Index
Sample No.
28 ATTERBERG LIMITS (ASTM D4318)
CH
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

CL-ML
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
I
T
Y
I
N
D
E
X

LIQUID LIMIT
% Pass
#200 Sieve Preparation
Method
B4-Bulk 19 9 62.3
Unified Soil Classification
Description
ML
CL
MH
drySANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)
Project: Roseville KT-52 Park
Location: Roseville, California
Number: S2759-05-01
Figure: B2
Geocon Inc
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Telephone: 858-558-6900
Date: 5/23/2024
PI COPY 2 S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ US_LAB.GDT 6/21/24 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 85
90 95
100

0.0010.010.1110100

60 fine
2003

16.2 PL
4 3 810 14
19 28
D10
41 16 20 30
U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS
9 1.5
Cc
40 50
%Silt %Clay
100140
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Classification
Sample No.

Sample No. LL
3/4 1/2

HYDROMETER

37.7 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

46.2B4-Bulk
B4-Bulk

0.009

0.0 COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT
2 fine coarse medium
6 D30D100
Cu

PI
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION (ASTM D422, D6913)
3/8
coarse

SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)
%Gravel %Sand
2 6
D50

0.041
Project: Roseville KT-52 Park
Location: Roseville, California
Number: S2759-05-01
Figure: B3
Geocon Consultants, Inc.
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Telephone: 916-852-9118
GRAIN SIZE COPY 2 S2759-05-01 ROSEVILLE KT-52 PARK.GPJ US_LAB.GDT 6/21/24 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding
95 100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
145
150
125
115

MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP
20 25 30
US_COMPACTION COPY 2.GPJ US_LAB.GDT 1/26/07
PCF
CURVE NO. B4-Bulk
%
5 DRY DENSITY, pcf
PI
Source of Material
Description of Material
WATER CONTENT, %
105
1510

2.80 2.70

2.60 120
110
Optimum Water Content
Maximum Dry Density

TEST RESULTS
Test Method
95 100
130
135
113.1
Project: Roseville KT-52 Park
Location: Roseville, California
Number: S2759-05-01
Figure: B4
LL PL
Geocon Consultants, Inc.
3160 Gold Valley Drive, Suite 800
Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Telephone: (916) 852-9118
Fax: (916) 852-9132
140
D1557A

SANDY LEAN CLAY(CL)
B4-Bulk (0-5')

ATTERBERG LIMITS
Curves of 100% Saturation
for Specific Gravity Equal to:

DRY DENSITY, pcf
14 For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

DRAW

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024]

DRAWINGS

Project: __________________________

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

AB 626 - 1

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024] TEXT OF AB 626
Assembly Bill No. 626

CHAPTER 810

An act to add and repeal Section 9204 of the Public Contract Code, relating to public contracts.

[Approved by Governor September 29, 2016. Filed with Secretary of State September 29, 2016.]
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
AB 626, Chiu. Public contracts: claim resolution.

Existing law prescribes various requirements regarding the formation, content, and enforcement of state and local public contracts. Existing law applicable to state public contracts generally requires that the resolution of claims related to those contracts be subject to arbitration.

Existing law applicable to local agency contracts prescribes a process for the resolution of claims related to those contracts of $375,000 or less.

This bill would establish, for contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017, a claim resolution process applicable to any claim by a contractor in connection with a public works project. The bill would define a claim as a separate demand by the contractor for one or more of the following: a time extension for relief from damages or penalties for delay, payment of money or damages arising from work done pursuant to the contract for a public work, or payment of an amount disputed by the public entity, as specified.

This bill would require a public entity, defined to exclude certain state entities, upon receipt of a claim sent by registered or certified mail, to review it and, within 45 days, provide a written statement identifying the disputed and undisputed portions of the claim. The bill would authorize the 45-day period to be extended by mutual agreement. The bill would require any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim to be processed within 60 days, as specified. The bill would require that the claim be deemed rejected in its entirety if the public entity fails to issue the written statement.

This bill would authorize, if the claimant disputes the public entity’s written response or if the public entity fails to respond to a claim within the time prescribed, the claimant to demand to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. The bill would require any disputed portion of the claim that remains in dispute after the meet and confer conference to be subject to nonbinding mediation, as specified. The bill would provide that unpaid claim amounts accrue interest at 7% per annum. The bill would prescribe a procedure by which a subcontractor or lower tier contractor may make a claim through the contractor.

This bill would require the text of these provisions, or a summary, to be set forth in the plans or specifications for any public work which may give rise to a claim. The bill would specify that a waiver of these rights is void and contrary to public policy, except as specified. The bill would also specify that it does not impose liability on a public entity that makes loans or grants available through a competitive application process, for the failure of an awardee to meet its contractual obligations.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

AB 626 - 2

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024] By increasing the duties of local agencies and officials, this bill would impose a state- mandated local program.

This bill would, on January 1, 2020, repeal the provision establishing the claim resolution process.

This bill would specify that these provisions constitute a matter of statewide concern.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 9204 is added to the Public Contract Code, to read:

9204. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that it is in the best interests of the state and its citizens to ensure that all construction business performed on a public works project in the state that is complete and not in dispute is paid in full and in a timely manner.
(b) Notwithstanding any other law, including, but not limited to, Article 7.1 (commencing with Section 10240) of Chapter 1 of Part 2, Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 19100) of Part 2, and Article 1.5 (commencing with Section 20104) of Chapter 1 of Part 3, this section shall apply to any claim by a contractor in connection with a public works project. (c) For purposes of this section:
(1) ” Claim” means a separate demand by a contractor sent by registered mail or certified mail with return receipt requested, for one or more of the following:
(A) A time extension, including, without limitation, for relief from damages or penalties for delay assessed by a public entity under a contract for a public works project. (B) Payment by the public entity of money or damages arising from work done by, or on behalf of, the contractor pursuant to the contract for a public works project and payment for which is not otherwise expressly provided or to which the claimant is not otherwise entitled. (C) Payment of an amount that is disputed by the public entity. (2) ”Contractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who has entered into a direct contract with a public entity for a public works project. (3) (A) ” Public entity” means, without limitation, except as provided in subparagraph (B), a state agency, department, office, division, bureau, board, or commission, the California State University, the University of California, a city, including a charter city, county, including a charter county, city and county, including a charter city and county, district, special district, public authority, political subdivision, public corporation, or nonprofit transit corporation wholly owned by a public agency and formed to carry out the purposes of the public agency. (B) ” Public entity” shall not include the following:
(i) The Department of Water Resources as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.
(ii) The Department of Transportation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

AB 626 - 3

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024] (iii) The Department of Parks and Recreation as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department.
(iv) The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation with respect to any project under its jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 11 (commencing with Section 7000) of Title 7 of Part 3 of the Penal Code.
(v) The Military Department as to any project under the jurisdiction of that department. (vi) The Department of General Services as to all other projects. (vii) The High-Speed Rail Authority.
(4) ”Public works project” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind. (5) ”Subcontractor” means any type of contractor within the meaning of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code who either is in direct contract with a contractor or is a lower tier subcontractor. (d) (1) (A) Upon receipt of a claim pursuant to this section, the public entity to which the claim applies shall conduct a reasonable review of the claim and, within a period not to exceed 45 days, shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying what portion of the claim is disputed and what portion is undisputed. Upon receipt of a claim, a public entity and a contractor may, by mutual agreement, extend the time period provided in this subdivision. (B) The claimant shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. (C) If the public entity needs approval from its governing body to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion of the claim, and the governing body does not meet within the 45 days or within the mutually agreed to extension of time following receipt of a claim sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall have up to three days following the next duly publicly noticed meeting of the governing body after the 45-day period, or extension, expires to provide the claimant a written statement identifying the disputed portion and the undisputed portion. (D) Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. If the public entity fails to issue a written statement, paragraph (3) shall apply.
(2) (A) If the claimant disputes the public entity’s written response, or if the public entity fails to respond to a claim issued pursuant to this section within the time prescribed, the claimant may demand in writing an informal conference to meet and confer for settlement of the issues in dispute. Upon receipt of a demand in writing sent by registered mail or certified mail, return receipt requested, the public entity shall schedule a meet and confer conference within 30 days for settlement of the dispute.
(B) Within 10 business days following the conclusion of the meet and confer conference, if the claim or any portion of the claim remains in dispute, the public entity shall provide the claimant a written statement identifying the portion of the claim that remains in dispute and the portion that is undisputed. Any payment due on an undisputed portion of the claim shall be processed and made within 60 days after the public entity issues its written statement. Any disputed portion of the claim, as identified by the contractor in writing, shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation, with the public entity and the claimant sharing the associated costs equally. The public entity and claimant shall mutually agree to a mediator within 10 business days after the disputed portion of the claim has been identified in writing. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator, each party shall select a mediator and those mediators shall select a qualified neutral third party to mediate with regard to the disputed portion of the claim. Each For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

AB 626 - 4

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024] party shall bear the fees and costs charged by its respective mediator in connection with the selection of the neutral mediator. If mediation is unsuccessful, the parts of the claim remaining in dispute shall be subject to applicable procedures outside this section. (C) For purposes of this section, mediation includes any nonbinding process, including, but not limited to, neutral evaluation or a dispute review board, in which an independent third party or board assists the parties in dispute resolution through negotiation or by issuance of an evaluation. Any mediation utilized shall conform to the timeframes in this section. (D) Unless otherwise agreed to by the public entity and the contractor in writing, the mediation conducted pursuant to this section shall excuse any further obligation under Section 20104.4 to mediate after litigation has been commenced. (E) This section does not preclude a public entity from requiring arbitration of disputes under private arbitration or the Public Works Contract Arbitration Program, if mediation under this section does not resolve the parties’ dispute.
(3) Failure by the public entity to respond to a claim from a contractor within the time periods described in this subdivision or to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section shall result in the claim being deemed rejected in its entirety. A claim that is denied by reason of the public entity’s failure to have responded to a claim, or its failure to otherwise meet the time requirements of this section, shall not constitute an adverse finding with regard to the merits of the claim or the responsibility or qualifications of the claimant. (4) Amounts not paid in a timely manner as required by this section shall bear interest at 7 percent per annum.
(5) If a subcontractor or a lower tier subcontractor lacks legal standing to assert a claim against a public entity because privity of contract does not exist, the contractor may present to the public entity a claim on behalf of a subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor. A subcontractor may request in writing, either on his or her own behalf or on behalf of a lower tier subcontractor, that the contractor present a claim for work which was performed by the subcontractor or by a lower tier subcontractor on behalf of the subcontractor. The subcontractor requesting that the claim be presented to the public entity shall furnish reasonable documentation to support the claim. Within 45 days of receipt of this written request, the contractor shall notify the subcontractor in writing as to whether the contractor presented the claim to the public entity and, if the original contractor did not present the claim, provide the subcontractor with a statement of the reasons for not having done so.
(e) The text of this section or a summary of it shall be set forth in the plans or specifications for any public works project that may give rise to a claim under this section. (f) A waiver of the rights granted by this section is void and contrary to public policy, provided, however, that (1) upon receipt of a claim, the parties may mutually agree to waive, in writing, mediation and proceed directly to the commencement of a civil action or binding arbitration, as applicable; and (2) a public entity may prescribe reasonable change order, claim, and dispute resolution procedures and requirements in addition to the provisions of this section, so long as the contractual provisions do not conflict with or otherwise impair the timeframes and procedures set forth in this section.
(g) This section applies to contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2017. (h) Nothing in this section shall impose liability upon a public entity that makes loans or grants available through a competitive application process, for the failure of an awardee to meet its contractual obligations.
(i) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2020, and as of that date is For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

AB 626 - 5

[B:\City Attorney\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\buildings & grounds.docx; 1/4/2024] repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2020, deletes or extends that date.

SECTION 2.

The Legislature finds and declares that it is of statewide concern to require a charter city, charter county, or charter city and county to follow a prescribed claims resolution process to ensure there are uniform and equitable procurement practices.

SECTION 3.

If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

For Council Approval
Not for Bidding

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3759
File #:
0800-04
Title:

On-Call General Plumbing Services – Contract Purchase Agreements Contact:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends City Council adopt four (4) resolutions authorizing the City Manager to execute contract purchase agreements for on-call general plumbing services with THP Mechanical, LLC, ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc., Lawson SSP Group, and TriCorp Group, Inc. to provide on- call general plumbing services.

The Request for Proposals (RFP) allows for four optional renewal years at one-year intervals.

Staff requests authorization to utilize the optional renewal years of the agreement without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the agreements expire, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendors is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
In October of 2024, Facility Services released a Request for Proposals (01-082) to solicit proposals to provide general plumbing services. Seven (7) qualified proposals were received and, after careful review and rating of each proposal, staff recommends awarding a service agreement to
four vendors
. The total combined value of the four (4) agreements is $300,000. The intent is to enter into a five-year agreement, an initial one-year agreement with four optional renewal years, with the selected vendors.

FISCAL IMPACT
The initial contract for each vendor will be $75,000, for a combined total of $300,000 for FY2024- 25, not to exceed the annual budgeted amounts. Funding for this year is included in the Building Maintenance and Facility Rehabilitation Divisions' FY2024-25 budgets in the Facility Services Fund. The funds will be encumbered one year at a time, pending Council approval of each budget year. The combined projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2025-26, $350,000; FY2026-27, $400,000; FY2027-28, $450,000; and FY2028-29, $500,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves maintenance, repair or minor tenant improvements to existing City facilities. These activities are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Darci Carpenter, Administrative Technician
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-044
CPA 3004345 - THP MECHANICAL
Resolution 25-045
CPA 3004342 - ACCO ENG SYS INC
Resolution 25-046
CPA 3004348 - LAWSON SSP GROUP
Resolution 25-047
CPA 3004349 - TRICORP GROUP
RESOLUTION NO. 25-044

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND THP MECHANICAL, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004345) for general plumbing services, by and between the City of Roseville and THP Mechanical, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-045

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ACCO ENGINEERED SYSTEMS, INC., AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004342) for general plumbing services, by and between the City of Roseville and ACCO Engineered Systems, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-046

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND LAWSON SSP GROUP, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004348) for general plumbing services, by and between the City of Roseville and Lawson SSP Group, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-047

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND TRICORP GROUP, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004349) for general plumbing services, by and between the City of Roseville and TriCorp Group, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3758
File #:
0800-04
Title:

On-Call General Construction Services – Contract Purchase Agreements Contact:

Darci Carpenter 916-774-5702 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.8.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt three resolutions authorizing the City Manager to execute contract purchase agreements with general construction services contractors:

Bullard, Inc - $1,000,000
Carter/Kelly, Incorporated - $500,000
TriCorp Group, Inc
. - $300,000
The
Request for Proposals (
RFP) allows for four optional renewal years at one-year intervals for each contract.

Staff requests authorization to utilize the four optional renewal years at one-year intervals without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the agreements expire or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendors is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
In October of 2024, the Public Works Facilities Division released a Request for Proposals (RFP #01-081) to solicit proposals to provide on-call general constructions services. Six (6) companies submitted proposals. The proposals were evaluated on overall proposal, cost, qualifications, and experience and, after careful review and rating of each proposal, staff recommends awarding a service agreement to
three vendors
. The total combined value of the three (3) agreements is $1,800,000. The intent is to enter into an initial one-year agreement with four optional renewal years with the selected vendors.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated combined value of these contracts is $1,800,000 for FY2024-25, not to exceed annual budgeted amounts. Funding for this year is included in the Building Maintenance and Facility Rehabilitation Divisions FY2024-25 budgets in the Facility Services Fund. The funds will be encumbered one year at a time pending Council approval of each budget year. Combined projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2025-26, $2,000,000; FY2026-27, $2,200,000, FY2027-28, $2,400,000, and FY2028-29, $2,800,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves maintenance, repair or minor tenant improvements to existing City facilities. These activities are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Darci Carpenter, Administrative Technician
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-041
CPA 3004372 - BULLARD INC
Resolution 25-042
CPA 3004374 - CARTER KELLY INC
Resolution 25-043
CPA 3004375 - TRICORP GROUP INC
NOE - CEQA RFP 01-081 General Construction Srvs
RESOLUTION NO. 25-041

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BULLARD, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004372) for general construction services, by and between the City of Roseville and Bullard, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-042

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CARTER/KELLY, INCORPORATED, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004374) for general construction services, by and between the City of Roseville and Carter/Kelly, Incorporated, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

RESOLUTION NO. 25-043

APPROVING AN ON-CALL CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND TRICORP GROUP, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, an on-call contract purchase agreement (3004375) for general construction services, by and between the City of Roseville and TriCorp Group, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until staff determines that continuing with this consultant is not in the best interest of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

Notice of Exemption

To: Placer County Clerk From: City of Roseville
Recorder’s Office Development Services Dept.
2954 Richardson Drive 311 Vernon Street
Auburn, CA 95603 Roseville, CA 95678

Project Title: General Construction Services On-Call Contract, 2025

Project Location(s): City-owned facilities, Roseville, CA

Project Description: This project consists of the approval of a contract for on-call general construction services for potentially any City-owned and/or operated facilities located throughout the city. The on-call contract would allow for the City to use the selected vendor for various general construction projects on an as-needed basis. Work would be limited to City-owned and operated facilities and would not be located near any environmentally sensitive resources.

Public Agency Approving Project: Roseville City Council

Agency/Individual Carrying Out Project: City of Roseville Public Works Department

Reason why this Project is Exempt: This project qualifies for a Class 1 E xemption as described in Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which states:

“Class 1 consists of the…repair, maintenance,…or minor alteration of existing public…structures, facilities, [or] mechanical equipment…involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use…. Examples include but are not limited to: (a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances; [and] (b) Existing facilities of both investor and publicly owned utilities used to provide electric power, natural gas, sewerage, or other public utility services…”

The project is confined to City-owned and/or operated property and would not result in expansion of use.

No environmentally sensitive resources are located within the properties; therefore the Class 1 exemption is applicable to the proposed project.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Darci Carpenter, Public Works Department – Facility Services, 2005 Hilltop Circle, Roseville, CA 95747. (916) 774-5702.

Signature: Date: 1/15/2025
Jessica Lynch, Environmental Coordinator, City of
Roseville

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3756
File #:
0704-01
Title:

Mahany Park Backstop #4 Repair Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Kelly Appier 916-774-5927 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the
Mahany Park Backstop Field #4 Repair
Project
as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director to execute the attached Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The repair site is at Mahany Park at 1575 Pleasant Grove Boulevard at the large baseball field (Field #4). During the winter storms of 2023, four of the ten vertical steel posts of the backstop shifted and became out of plumb. Based on a structural engineer’s assessment, it was recommended these be replaced. As part of the project, accessibility upgrades to the path of travel/concrete pathways were completed.

In accordance with City specifications, the contractor shall guarantee the installation of these improvements for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of this Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the Mahany Park Backstop Repairs project was approved during the FY2024-25 budget in the Citywide Park Fund and is anticipated to be reimbursed 75% by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 18.75% by the state, and ultimately be 6.25% City funded.

There will be no increase in maintenance costs.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B – Support community engagement and advocacy
Goal C – Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E – Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F – Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Kelly Appier, Project Manager, Park Development
Jill Geller, Director, Parks, Recreation & Libraries

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-039
NOC
Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 25-039

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS MAHANY PARK BACKSTOP #4 REPAIR PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND AUTHORIZING THE

PARKS, RECREATION AND LIBRARIES DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as Mahany Park Backstop #4 Repair Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678

Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:

________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

St
ate of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal
corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true. ___________________________________
C
ity of Roseville
St
ate of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of , 20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
P
lace Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

P L E A S A N T G R O V E B L

W O O D C R E E K O A K S B L
S
U
N
C
I T
Y
B
L
M

C A N A L L Y D R

ROADRUNNER DR
M
I
C
H
E
N
E
R
D
R
R
O
S
E
C
R
E
E
K
R
D

C A N E V A R I D R
S
Y
L
V
A
N
G
L
E
N
L
N
G
R
E
E
N
G
R
O
V
E
L
N
S
T
E
I
N
B
E
C
K
D
R

DICKINSON DR

A Y L E S B U
R
Y
W
Y
L
O
N
G
F
E
L
L
O
W
C
I
D
R
A
G
O
N
F
L
Y
L
N

E C H O R O C K
L N

N A P A L
P
C
O
A
C
H

W H I P
W
Y
F
R
O
N
T
I
E
R
L
N

D E R R Y L I N D R

H U M M I N G B I R D W Y G
L
A
S
T
O
N
B
U
R
Y
C
I

CARAGH ST
V
O

L T A I R
E
D
R
F
I T
Z
G
E
R
A
L
D
W Y

BLACKBIRD ST
³

PROJECT SITE
The project scope of work includes removing and replacing four backstop posts that are no longer plumb. Installing new fence fabric and backstop boards. Accessibility upgrades include a new concrete walkway and elimination of raised asphalt.

Mahany Park
1545 Pleasant Grove Blvd., Roseville, CA 95747
Exhibit A
Mahany Park

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3757
File #:
0704
Title:

Joint Use of High School/Park Sites - Master Agreement
Contact:

Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a Master Agreement for Joint Use of High School/Park Sites with the Roseville Joint Union High School District for a term of five (5) years, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville and the Roseville Joint Union High School District (RJUHSD) have partnered to renew our joint use agreement, with the last agreement being approved in July 2019.

This agreement provides both entities with priority access to each other’s sports fields and facilities, fostering collaboration to meet the needs of the student body and the broader Roseville community.

Under this agreement, RJUHSD’s facilities, Oakmont, Roseville, Adelante, Woodcreek, and West Park High Schools, will be accessible to the City for recreational programs. Likewise, the City will offer RJUHSD priority use of its facilities, including all-weather fields, tennis courts, softball and baseball fields, meeting rooms, the Roseville Aquatic Complex, and the gymnasium at the Mahany Fitness Center.

The spirit of the agreement emphasizes partnership and shared resources to support and expand programming opportunities for both RJUHSD’s athletic programs and the City’s recreational programming.

Key details of the agreement include procedures for reserving facilities and outlining user obligations. Costs incurred beyond normal use, such as utilities, materials, or staff time, will be billed at a discounted partner rate.

Additionally, both RJUHSD and the City will contribute to capital improvement costs proportional to the facility use percentage.

The renewed joint use agreement is proposed for a five-year term.

FISCAL IMPACT
Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) will receive a total of $377,000 for the first three years of this agreement for use of the Roseville Aquatics Complex.

The City and RJUHSD will review the
previous three years of hours used by RJUHSD at the Roseville Aquatics Complex to establish fees for years four and five.

Additionally, the City and RJUHSD may be required to pay per use fees, at a discounted rate, for use of facilities and this will be reflected in the PRL operating budget. The City’s fair share costs for facility use will be absorbed in the Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) operating budget in the General Fund. This agreement also outlines capital improvement costs for each user, based on their percentage of use.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The proposed Joint Use Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services

Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Nereson, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-040
RJUHSD Master Agreement for Facility/ Parks Use

RESOLUTION NO. 25-040

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

THE ROSEVILLE JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a Master Agreement for Joint Use of High School/Park Sites, between the City of Roseville and the Roseville Joint Union High School District, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR

ATTEST:

City Clerk

ATTEST:

BY: -----------

CARMEN AVALOS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY: -----------

MICHELLE SHEIDENBERGER
City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

BY:

JILL GELLER
Parks, Recreation & Libraries
Director
and
BECKER
· ·ict Superintendent

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3751
File #:
0400-04-13-1
Title:

Creekview - Phase 4 - Village 7 - Notice of Completion
Contact:

Pablo Macias 916-717-9196 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Creekview Phase 4, Village 7,

CWJ# 190951
as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Pablo Macias, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-035
NOC
Exhibit A
Final Map

RESOLUTION NO. 25-035

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW - PHASE 4 - VILLAGE 7 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Creekview - Phase 4 - Village 7 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder's Office Book GG of Maps, Page 88 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 20_, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
day of __________________ ,

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3752
File #:
0400-04-13-1
Title:

Creekview - Phase 4 - Villages 6 & 8 - Notice of Completion Contact:

Pablo Macias 916-751-9196 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Creekview Phase 4, Villages 6 & 8
,
CWJ#
190947 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Pablo Macias, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-036
NOC
Exhibit A
Final Maps
RESOLUTION NO. 25-036

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CREEKVIEW - PHASE 4 - VILLAGES 6 & 8 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTJNG THE CITY ENGINEER

TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDMSION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

I. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Creekview - Phase 4 - Villages 6 & 8 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder's Office Book GG of Maps, Page 90, 89 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 20_, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
day of __________________ ,

MAYOR

ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3753
File #:
0323
Title:

Downtown Roseville Security Patrol - Professional Services Agreement Contact:

Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]
Jeff Beigh 916-774-5041 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a professional services agreement with Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services, and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
The Police Department is requesting the assistance of private security patrols in the Downtown and historic Old Town areas to assist in providing public safety. The intent of the private security contractor is to provide a consistent presence and to be responsible for tasks that may not require the response of a Police Officer to handle. The Police Department issued a request for proposals (RFP) on July 24, 2024 seeking private security assistance with the specific scope of services as noted below from the RFP:

The City of Roseville requires mobile armed security patrols to assist in the Downtown Vernon Street corridor and Historic OId Town Roseville District. Areas of patrol to include the Downtown District, the Historic District, Downtown Roseville Partnership membership properties, and city facilities to include public property, 311 Vernon St. (Civic Center and Town Square), 316 Vernon St. (City Offices), Civic Center Parking Garage, Oak Street Parking Garage, and 225 Taylor St. (Downtown Library). Detailed map of scope of service area included as Attachment F. The contracted patrol area does not include any private property of the Union Pacific Railroad which falls inside of the scope of service area included on the attached.

Patrol hours are from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM seven (7) days per week. Contractors shall patrol the areas listed continuously during the patrol period. Typical duties of the security patrols include, but are not limited to, the following:

1 .

Conduct uniformed visible (vehicle and foot) patrol of area for crime prevention and deterrence.
2 .

Respond to emergency situations observed while on patrol and notify appropriate City personnel.
3 .

Investigate unusual or suspicious conditions, including potential safety hazards. 4 .

Discourage trespassing on both public and private property. 5 .

Report observed criminal activity.
6 .

Question suspicious individuals.
7 .

Issue trespassing notices and/or city park exclusion notices as necessary. 8 .

Conduct on street parking enforcement, either with a manual or electronic process for identifying violations and issuing warnings or citations. 9 .

Meet and work with local business owners in the Downtown District and in the Historic District to address security concerns to include attendance at the monthly Downtown Roseville Partnership meetings hosted by the downtown business owners. 10 .

Respond to complaints and security issues of local business owners in the Downtown District and in the Historic District.
11 .

Respond to up to fifty (50) calls for complaint service outside of regularly scheduled hours as needed and specified.
12 .

Provide weekly reports on activities to the Roseville Police Department. 13 .

Monitoring admittance of personnel and authorized visitors to City facilities during specified meetings, specifically to include operating magnetometers at Civic Center entrance for Council Chambers during City Council Meetings (typically two Wednesday evenings per month).
14 .

Provide security presence at specified events on an as needed basis for special events hosted by the City.
15 .

Other security related duties as may be required by the City.

Following the request for proposal process, the Police Department reviewed proposals provided by private security contractors and selected
Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal
Security Services as the contractor for this project. The contractor will work with a Police Lieutenant in implementing the planned approach to providing the enhanced security services in coordination with the Police Department.

FISCAL IMPACT
The first year cost for the security service is $154,905.88. Funding for downtown security services is included in the Police Department's FY2024-25 operating budget in the General Fund. No additional funding is being requested.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a professional services agreement for security services meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Peinado, Management Analyst
Troy Bergstrom, Police Chief

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-037
PSA - Downtown Roseville Security Patrol
Downtown Security Patrol Area Coverage Map

RESOLUTION NO. 25-037

APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP DBA ALLIED

UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

WHEREAS, a professional services agreement for downtown Roseville security patrol services, by and between the City of Roseville and Universal Protection Service, LP dba Allied Universal Security Services, has been reviewed by the City Council; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said professional services agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

________________________
City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3748
File #:
0103-41-03
Title:

Board of Appeals Appointment
Contact:

Travis Cochran 916-774-5325 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint Sharon Lawin to the Board of Appeals for a term expiring December 31, 2028.

BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on December 18, 2024, the bi-annual appointments to the Board of Appeals were made. Sharon Lawin, a then-current member of the Board of Appeals was intended to be included among the individuals recommended for appointment, but was inadvertently omitted.

Ms. Lawin was originally appointed to the Board of Appeals on June 5, 2024, to fill a partial term created by a vacancy. Her partial term was set to expire on December 31, 2024. Prior to the expiration of her partial term, Ms. Lawin expressed her interest in being re-appointed to the Board of Appeals to serve a full term, but her name was inadvertently omitted from the candidate pool presented to the City Council on December 18, 2024. Had Ms. Lawin been included as intended, City staff would have strongly recommended her appointment to the Board of Appeals for a full term. This appointment will increase the current membership of the Board of Appeals to eleven members, which is allowed by the Roseville Municipal Code and the City's Administrative Standards.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The appointment of members to boards or commissions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Travis Cochran, Deputy City Attorney
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3764
File #:
0102-06
Title:

Proclamation - Government Communications Day February 21 Contact:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim February 21, 2025, as Government Communications Day and encourage all residents to thank Roseville government communications employees who have dedicated their careers to ensure the City of Roseville has effective, impactful, and successful communication strategies that resonate and are relevant.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Not applicable.

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Proclamation - Government Communications Day February 21

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3765
File #:
0102-06
Title:

Proclamation - National Procurement Month March 2025
Contact:

Blair Hutchison 916-774-5266 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 6.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim March 2025 as Procurement Month and urge all citizens to join the City of Roseville in recognizing the contribution and importance of our Purchasing Division employees and their impact within business, industry and government.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Not applicable.

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Proclamation - National Procurement Month March 2025

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3750
File #:
0102-16
Title:

Council Discretionary Funds - Westbrook Elementary Parent Teacher Club Contact:

Heather Blanco 916-746-1171 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Recommend City Council consider a request for a $5,000 Platinum Sponsorship from Council Discretionary Funds for Westbrook Elementary Parent Teacher Club (PTC) for the first Parent’s Comedy Night Out Fundraiser, hosted by Roseville Theatre Arts Academy (RTAA).

Collaboratively RTAA and Westbrook PTC‘s fundraising goal for this comedy event is $20,000 which will benefit local students’ educational opportunities. The Sponsorship will help with some of the event expenses, i.e., printing, marketing, Westbrook Auction Table, décor, concessions, and operations.

BACKGROUND
Westbrook Elementary PTC has never requested Council Discretionary Funds or any grant funding from the City. Westbrook Elementary PTC is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization for the purpose of supporting the education of children at Westbrook Elementary.

Westbrook Elementary was founded in 2023 and is a new school in the Roseville City School District located in West Roseville.

The Citizens’ Benefit Fund was established in 1993 with the net proceeds from the sale of the Roseville Hospital. The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, annually appropriate up to 90 percent of the annual earnings of the Citizens’ Benefit Fund for the purpose of improving the quality of life for the citizens of the City of Roseville. The City Council, without the recommendation of the Roseville Grants Advisory Commission, may annually appropriate a minor amount up to $15,000 of the annual earnings for the purpose of improving the quality of life in Roseville.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. Annually, the Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer allocates $15,000 of the annual earnings on the Citizens’ Benefit Fund per section 4.06.040 in the Municipal Code and includes it in the annual budget along with the Citizens’ Benefit Fund resources available for appropriation each year. These earnings are restricted for the purpose of improving the quality of life for Roseville residents and appropriated by the City Council. The balance remaining in the Council’s Discretionary Funds for FY2024-25 is $10,321.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The award of funds meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal B - Support community engagement and advocacy

Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Blanco, Executive Assistant
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Westbrook Elementary PTC

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #:
3761
File #:
0900-04-02
Title:

Roseville Parkway Extension Project - Notice of Completion Contact:

Jesse Khatkar 916-774-5434 [email protected]

Meeting Date: 2/19/2025
Item #: 8.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Roseville Parkway Extension Project as complete and adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Roseville Parkway Extension project constructed a
multi-lane arterial roadway providing a
connection from Northwest Roseville to East Roseville and Granite Bay. The project scope included
:

Four vehicle travel lanes (two in each direction);
Curb, gutter and sidewalk;
On-street bike lanes;
Separated multi-use path;
Street lights;
Street landscaping; and
An overpass spanning the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks and Industrial Avenue

The Public Works Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the Roseville Parkway Extension Project and has found the work to be completed in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications and is now ready for acceptance. As required by the Specifications and Faithful Performance Bond, the Contractor shall guarantee the installation of all improvements for a period of 12 months from the date of the Notice of Completion.

The Roseville Parkway Extension opened to the public on the evening of Wednesday, January 29, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was funded by developer paid Traffic Mitigation Fees. No General Fund resources were used for this project. T
he final accounting of construction costs is ongoing and is currently estimated at approximately $22.3 million. This is within the approved project budget and no additional resources are required.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Project level CEQA compliance for the Roseville Parkway Extension project was accomplished with preparation of the Roseville Parkway Extension Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted: September 16, 2020). Because the Roseville Parkway Extension project is consistent with the project evaluated in the Roseville Parkway Extension Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Roseville Parkway Extension Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth

Respectfully Submitted,
Jesse Khatkar, Senior Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director

_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 25-049
Notice of Completion
Project Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 25-049

ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS THE ROSEVILLE PARKWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, APPROVING THE “NOTICE OF COMPLETION”, AND

AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The “Notice of Completion” on file in the City Clerk’s Department relative to that public work known as the Roseville Parkway Extension Project, has been approved and the public work accepted.

2. The Public Works Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ____ day of _____________________, 2025, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

______________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:

_________________________________
City Clerk

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY
CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO

TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk

State of California )
County of Placer )

I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville

State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

FOOTHILLS BOULEVARD

FOOTHILLS BOULEVARD

FOOTHILL

COMMERCE
CENTER

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

INDUSTRIAL AVENUE

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD

BRIDGE OVER INDUSTRIAL AVENUE

AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

PROJECT BEGINS

PROJECT ENDS

PROJECT LIMITS

BLUE OAKS BL

FOOTHILLS BLVD

PLEASANT GROVE BL

GALLERIA BL

BASELINE RD

WOODCREEK OAKS BL

WASHINGTON BL

PLEASANTGROVE BL
HWY 65
I-80

ROSEVILLE

PARKWAY

PROJECT
ENDS

PROJECT
LIMITS

PROJECT BEGINSINDUSTRIAL AVE

EXHIBIT A

PROJECT AREA MAP

LOCATION MAP

NO SCALE