City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.12
File #: 0400-04-15-1
Item ID: 2026-201
Title: Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 Backbone Roads - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 Backbone Roads as complete. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact on the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 Backbone Roads CWJ#190680 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City Specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-074
2. Notice of Completion
3. Exhibit A - Vicinity Map
4. Final Map
REVIEWERS:
Troy Galvin, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 3/11/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 3/12/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 3/12/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/18/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-074
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1 – SUBPHASE A1 BACKBONE ROADS PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 Backbone Roads project is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 In-Tract recorded in Book GG of Maps, Page 63, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 Backbone Roads project.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY
CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO
TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
WESTBROOK BL
Exhibit A: Vicinity Map
City of Roseville
Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1
Backbone Roads
Project
Location
.
0 0.250.13
Miles
BLUE
OAKS BL
WESTBROOK BL
FI
DDYME
NT
RD
Vicinity Map
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.13
File #: 0400-04-15-1
Item ID: 2026-205
Title: Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 In-Tract - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 In- Tract as complete. The Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
This action has no impact on the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution accepting Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A1 In-Tract CWJ#190793 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-065
2. Notice of Completion
3. Vicinity Map
4. Final Map
REVIEWERS:
Troy Galvin, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 3/11/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 3/12/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 3/12/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/18/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-065
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1 – SUBPHASE A1 IN-TRACT PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 In-Tract project is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 In-Tract project recorded in Book GG of Maps, Page 63, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A1 In-Tract project.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY
CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO
TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.14
File #: 0400-04-15-1
Item ID: 2026-204
Title: Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A2 - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-774-5441 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A2 as complete. The Engineering Division has made the final inspection of the project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact on the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A2 CWJ#191101 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.
BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.
FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-072
2. Notice of Completion
3. Vicinity/Area Map
4. Final Map
REVIEWERS:
Troy Galvin, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Created/Initiated - 3/11/2026 Marc Stout, Development Services Department - Engineering Division Approved - 3/12/2026 Mike Isom, Development Services Department Approved - 3/12/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/17/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/17/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/18/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-072
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS AMORUSO RANCH PHASE 1 - SUBPHASE A2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,
THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.
BE RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:
1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A2 project is hereby approved and the public work accepted.
2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 - Subphase A2 project recorded in Book GG of Maps, Page 81, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Amoruso Ranch Phase 1 – Subphase A2 project.
3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY
CLERK
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt
from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383
NO
TICE OF COMPLETION
N
OTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.
The direct/general contractor on said project was .
The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
Cit
y of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________
_
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _ ____
day of ,
20 ___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.15
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2026-195
Title: Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness Assessment - Professional Services Agreement
Contact: Kristina McKee 916-774-5595 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a professional services agreement with Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC in the amount of $149,740 to provide services for an Operational Efficiency and Effectiveness Assessment.
The goal of this study is to identify opportunities to strengthen staff development, modernize service delivery, improve workflows, and promote consistent customer service. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities department budget in the Water Operations, Wastewater Operations and Waste Services Operations Funds.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution to approve a professional services agreement with Berry, Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC, for an assessment of its customer service and administrative functions and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BACKGROUND
The Environmental Utilities Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness Assessment is a department-wide project intended to evaluate and improve the administrative and customer service functions that support Water, Wastewater, and Waste Services. The study aims to strengthen staff development, modernize service delivery, streamline workflows, and enhance consistency in customer service.
On November 20, 2025, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued seeking a qualified consultant to conduct a comprehensive organizational and operational review, including analysis of customer service activities, internal coordination needs, and opportunities to improve structure and processes that support EU operations. Responses to the RFP were due January 8, 2026. Seven submissions were received.
A four-person panel made up of key staff within the Department and Human Resources (HR) reviewed and ranked the submissions. On February 2, 2026, virtual interviews were held with the top four ranked firms.
Staff recommends awarding a contract to Berry, Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC in the amount of $149,740.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities Department budget in the Water Operations, Wastewater Operations and Waste Services Operations Funds.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
The Environmental Utilities Strategic Plan Development meets the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
2. Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Kristina McKee, Management Analyst
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-066
2. Professional Services Agreement
REVIEWERS:
Kristina McKee, Environmental Utilities Department - Strategic Affairs Division Created/Initiated - 3/6/2026 Lanie Paquin, Environmental Utilities Department - Strategic Affairs Division Approved - 3/6/2026 Brian Craighead, Environmental Utilities Department Approved - 3/6/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 3/12/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/19/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-066
APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND BERRY, DUNN, MCNEIL, & PARKER, LLC, AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Professional Services Agreement for Environmental Utilities Organizational Efficiency and Effectiveness Assessment, by and between the City of Roseville and Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Professional Services Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 2026, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.16
File #: 0721
Item ID: 2026-222
Title: City of Roseville Title VI Program, Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan
Contact: Ed Scofield 916-774-5449 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the City of Roseville Title VI program, Public Participation Plan and the Language Assistance Plan. As a recipient of federal funds through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Roseville Transit is required to prepare a Title VI Program in accordance with the current FTA guidelines and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Implementation of these plans are already being performed by staff in continued compliance with federal requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
The Roseville Transportation Commission recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving the updated Roseville Title VI Program, Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan for 2025 through 2028.
BACKGROUND
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is responsible for ensuring that its funding recipients fully comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The City of Roseville, which operates Roseville Transit, is a recipient of FTA federal funds. As a recipient of federal funds, Roseville Transit is required to maintain a Title VI Program in accordance with the current FTA Circular (Circular 4702.1B).
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states the following: “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
The Title VI Program is required by FTA to be reviewed and approved by the City Council and submitted to FTA every three years. In order to adopt a document that meets the objectives of the Title VI program, agencies also prepare Public Participation and Language Assistance plans. Although these are separate plans, they are typically included as part of the Title VI Program document. The Public Participation Plan is located in Appendix D of the Title VI document, while the Language Assistance Plan is located in Appendix E.
Roseville Transit’s most recent Title VI Program was adopted in 2022. FTA provided a letter of concurrence in 2022 along with an assessment of the program. The proposed program incorporates updates to meet FTA requirements, updated census and language assistance data, and updated program elements.
The Title VI program provides that Roseville Transit grants all citizens equal access to its programs, projects and activities. Roseville Transit is also committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of its programs, projects and activities on the basis of race, color or
national origin. Furthermore, Roseville Transit shall continuously strive to ensure that equal opportunities are afforded to all individuals in its service area.
The objectives of the City of Roseville Title VI Program are:
• Ensure that the level and quality of public transportation service is provided in a non- discriminatory manner;
• Promote full and fair participation in public transportation decision- making without regard to race, color, or national origin; and • Ensure meaningful access to transit-related programs and activities by persons with limited English proficiency.
The updated Title VI Program includes the following updates:
• There are no ongoing Title VI complaints or lawsuits, or inquires. • No transit facilities were constructed with federal funds in the last 3 years. • Updated Language Assistance Plan with updated LEP population figures. • Minor edits to the Public Participation Plan.
On March 17, 2026, Roseville's Transportation Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the updated Title VI Program and associated plans. Notification of this public hearing was provided as follows:
• Publication of the public hearing notice in the Roseville Press-Tribune (English and Spanish) • Posting of the public hearing notice at the three City of Roseville libraries and Alternative Transportation offices (English and Spanish)
• City of Roseville website (available in multiple languages) • Roseville Transit E-notify
• City of Roseville Social media
• On Roseville Transit buses
The Transportation Commission voted to recommend City Council approval of the updated Title VI Program and the associated plans. Once approved, the plans will remain in effect through September 30, 2028.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact associated with this action.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378.
The update of the City of Roseville Title VI Program and associated plans meet the above criteria and is not
subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
Respectfully Submitted,
Ed Scofield, Alternative Transportation Planner
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-079
2. City of Roseville Title VI-2026
REVIEWERS:
Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Created/Initiated - 3/17/2026 Ed Scofield, Public Works Department - Transportation Approved - 3/17/2026 Jason Shykowski, Public Works Department - All Approved - 3/18/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/19/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-079
APPROVING THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE TITLE VI PROGRAM, PUBLIC
PARTICIPATION PLAN AND THE LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
LANGUAGE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville is a recipient through Federal Transit Administration (FTA) of federal funds; and
WHEREAS, staff has prepared the 2026 Title VI Program in accordance with the current FTA Circular; and
WHEREAS, the Title VI Program is required by FTA to be reviewed and submitted to FTA every three years; and
WHEREAS, in order to adopt a document that meets the objectives of the Title VI Program, staff has also prepared a Public Participation Plan and a Language Assistance Plan;
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2026, the Transportation Commission held a public hearing to receive comments regarding the updated Title VI Program and associated plans; and
WHEREAS, no public comments were received prior to or during the public hearing, and the Transportation Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the updated Title VI Program and associated plans; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that the City of Roseville Title VI Program, Public Participation Plan and the Language Assistance Plan are hereby approved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of __________________________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
TITLE VI PROGRAM
2025-2028
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Prepared by:
City of Roseville
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
roseville.ca.us/transit
Please direct comments/questions to:
City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division
at (916) 774-5293 or [email protected]
2 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
City of Roseville
Roseville Transit
The following information is being submitted as part of the City of Roseville, which operates Roseville Transit in compliance with theTitle VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act per FTA Circular 4702.1B, dated October 1, 2012.
General Reporting Requirements:
1. City of Roseville has electronically attested to the required FTA certifications and assurances.
2. City of Roseville has developed Title VI Complaint Procedures and Complaint Form that is available at the City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division office, located on all of the Roseville Transit buses and is posted on the City of Roseville website at roseville.ca.us/titlevi. Title VI Complaint Procedures can also be found in the Local and Commuter Services Guides.
3. City of Roseville maintains a Complaint log for Title VI Investigations, Complaints and Lawsuits. To date, there are no Title VI complaints that the City of Roseville is aware of.
4. City of Roseville has developed a Language Assistance Plan (LAP) which is included in this document.
5. City of Roseville has developed a Public Participation Plan which is included in this document.
6. City of Roseville will continue to make information available regarding Title VI obligations and apprise members of the public of the protections afforded to them.
7. City of Roseville has attached the required documents and is submitting the Title VI Program.
8. City of Roseville will provide any information that is requested by FTA.
3 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Table of Contents
I. Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Notice to the Public ......................................................................................................................... 5 III. Complaint Procedures ..................................................................................................................... 6 A. Internal Review Process .................................................................................................................... 6 B. Documentation ................................................................................................................................. 7 IV. Investigations, Complaints or Inquiries ........................................................................................... 7 V. Public Participation Plan .................................................................................................................. 8 A. Public Participation Activities............................................................................................................ 8 VI. Language Assistance Plan ................................................................................................................ 9 VII. Decision Making Committees and Councils ................................................................................... 11 A. Commission Racial Breakdown ....................................................................................................... 12 VIII. Subrecipient Compliance ............................................................................................................... 12 IX. Construction Equity Analysis.......................................................................................................... 13 X. Service Standards and Policies ....................................................................................................... 14 A. Vehicle Loads and Passengers Per Hour Standards ........................................................................ 15 B. Vehicle Headway (Frequency) Standards ....................................................................................... 16 C. Service Span Standards ................................................................................................................... 17 D. On-time Performance Standards .................................................................................................... 17 E. Fare Recovery and Average Subsidy Per Trip Standards ................................................................ 17 F. Bus Stops and Passenger Amenity Standards ................................................................................. 18 G. Service Availability and Connectivity Standards ............................................................................. 18 H. Safety, Maintenance and Replacement Standards ......................................................................... 19 I. Customer Service Standards ........................................................................................................... 19 J. Vehicle Assignment Policy .............................................................................................................. 19 XI. Requirements for Fixed Route Transit Providers ........................................................................... 20 Appendix A: City Council Approval ............................................................................................................. 21 Appendix B: Title VI Notice to the Public .................................................................................................... 23 Appendix C: Title VI Complaint Forms (English and Spanish) ..................................................................... 27 Appendix D: Public Participation Plan ......................................................................................................... 32
4 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix E: Language Assistance Plan ....................................................................................................... 42 Appendix F: Demographic Data .................................................................................................................. 47 Appendix G: Subrecipient Title VI Program – City of Lincoln Materials ...................................................... 55 Appendix H: Public Involvement Plan ......................................................................................................... 57 Appendix I: Public Comments ..................................................................................................................... 59
5 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
I. Overview
T
he Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is responsible for ensuring that its funding recipients fully comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The City of Roseville which operates Roseville Transit (hereafter referred to as Roseville Transit), is a recipient of federal funds. As a recipient of federal funds, Roseville Transit has prepared an update to its Title VI Program in accordance with FTA Circular 4702.1B, dated October 1, 2012. The City of Roseville Title VI Program is adopted by the Roseville City Council (see Appendix A).
Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states the following:
“No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Roseville Transit grants all citizens equal access to its transportation services and is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of its services on the basis of race, color, or national origin. Furthermore, Roseville Transit shall continuously strive to ensure that equal opportunities are afforded to all individuals in its service area.
Roseville's population as of January 1, 2026 was 170,696. Roseville Transit operates local fixed route, commuter service, Game Day Express, ADA Paratransit, and general public Arrow service with a total fleet of 43 buses.
II. Notice to the Public
To ensure Roseville Transit riders are aware of its commitment to Title VI compliance, and of their right to file a civil rights complaint, Roseville Transit posts notifications, in both English and Spanish, at the City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division office, on the buses, in the Bus Service Guides and on the City’s website:
roseville.ca.us/titlevi. Additionally, Roseville Transit’s website provides the ability to read Title VI information in the following languages: English, Spanish, Cantonese, French, German, Italian, Tagalog, Vietnamese, Korean, Russian and Hindi. A sample of Title VI notice is in Appendix B
6 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
III. Complaint Procedures
Any person who believes she or he has been discriminated against on the basis of race, color, or national origin by Roseville Transit may file a Title VI complaint by completing and submitting Roseville Transit’s Title VI Complaint Form with the Roseville Transit, Civil Rights Officer or with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).
The Title VI complaint form is available in both English and Spanish and is available in the City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division office, and on the City’s website:
roseville.ca.us/titlevi. The Title VI complaint procedures are also included in the Bus Service Guides. See Appendix B for a sample of the Title VI notice to the public and complaint procedures posted on Roseville Transit’s website. The information posted on the City’s website may be viewed online in multiple languages. A sample Title VI complaint form is in Appendix C.
A person may also file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration, at:
Federal Transit Administration
Office of Civil Rights
Complaint Team
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20590
Phone: 1-888-446-4511
Email: [email protected]
The complaint form may be downloaded from FTA’s website, go to:
transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/civil-rights-ada/fta-civil-rights-complaint-form for more information.
A. Internal Review Process
Roseville Transit investigates complaints received no more than 180 days after the alleged incident. Roseville Transit will process complaints that are complete. Once the complaint is received, Roseville Transit Civil Rights Officer will review the complaint to determine if Roseville Transit has jurisdiction and will send the complainant an acknowledgment letter informing her/him whether the complaint will be investigated by Roseville Transit.
7 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Roseville Transit has up to sixty (60) calendar days to investigate the complaint. If more information is needed to resolve the case, Roseville Transit may contact the complainant. The complainant has thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the letter to send requested information to the investigator assigned to the case; if within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the letter the investigator is not contacted by the complainant and the investigator does not receive the additional information requested in the letter, Roseville Transit can administratively close the case. A case can also be administratively closed if the complainant no longer wishes to pursue their case.
After the investigator reviews the complaint, Roseville Transit will issue one of two letters to the complainant: a closure letter or a letter of finding (LOF). A closure letter summarizes the allegations and states that there was not a Title VI violation and that the case will be closed.
An LOF summarizes the allegations and the interviews regarding the alleged incident, and explains whether any disciplinary action, additional training of the staff member or other action will occur. If the complainant wishes to appeal the decision, she/he has ten (10) business days after the date of the letter or the LOF to file an appeal with the City of Roseville Public Works Director.
B. Documentation
Roseville Transit maintains a list of active investigations conducted by FTA and entities other than FTA, including lawsuits and complaints naming Roseville Transit that allege discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. This list includes the date that the transit-related Title VI investigation, lawsuit or complaint was filed; a summary of the allegation(s); the status of the investigation, lawsuit or complaint; and actions taken by Roseville Transit in response, or final findings related to the investigation, lawsuit, or complaint.
IV. Investigations, Complaints or Inquiries
Currently, Roseville Transit does not have any ongoing Title VI complaints or lawsuits.
Roseville Transit has not had any customer service inquiries related to Title VI since the date of the last Title VI Program update in 2022.
File # Incident
Date
Summary of
Complaint
Status Action(s)
Taken
N/A
8 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
V. Public Participation Plan
A
s a recipient of federal transportation funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the City of Roseville (COR) is required to develop a Public Participation Plan (PPP) that implements the goals and objectives of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The PPP is intended to provide guidance for public involvement activities to be conducted by COR in the expenditure of FTA funds in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and FTA Circular 4702.1B (“Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients”). The PPP is provided as Appendix D.
A
Public Involvement Plan was prepared for the review and adoption of the Title VI Plan, including the Public Participation Plan and the Language Assistance Plan. A copy of the Public Involvement Plan is provided as Appendix H and a copy of comments received during the public outreach process is provided as Appendix I.
A. Public Participation Activities
The City of Roseville utilizes a range of public engagement strategies. These strategies are tailored to specific activities and include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Printed collateral – available onboard, in the transit administration office and/or at community facilities.
• Signage- onboard and at bus stops or transfer stations • Website announcements
• Email and text message notifications
• Social media posts
• Public hearing notices
• Connecting with community groups
• Participation at special events
• Presentations at public meetings
• Transit Trainers
• Information on board buses and at public counters
• Direct mailings
• Paid advertising
In addition to ongoing public outreach efforts, the following table shows activities undertaken in the last three years with major public engagement efforts.
9 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Activity Summary of Public Engagement Strategies
Roseville Short
Range Transit
Plan 2025-2030
Coordinated by region’s RPO (Placer County Transportation Planning Agency). Outreach included on-line survey; On- board bus surveys; In-person public presentations, such as to the Roseville Transportation Commission; public hearing notice; public hearing; and information posted on the City’s website, accessible in multiple languages.
Transit
Standards and
Conduct
Ordinance
Public hearing notice; public hearing; and information posted on the City’s website, accessible in multiple languages.
Overall
Disadvantaged
Business
Enterprise Goal
for Federal Fiscal
Year (FFY) 2021-
2023
Emails to list of interested parties, including local businesses; public hearing notices in English and Spanish posted in local print media and at civic locations; social media posts; public hearing; and information posted on the City’s website in English and Spanish, and accessible in multiple languages.
Roseville Transit
Service Change
Brochures in Spanish and English indicating the proposed Local and Commuter Service changes and soliciting public input were available on Roseville Transit buses, transit customer service outlets, and at community facilities;
community engagement through City of Roseville’s
newsletters, website, and social media channels; and public hearing notices were published in English and Spanish and displayed on all Roseville Transit buses.
VI. Language Assistance Plan
To ensure meaningful access to transit programs, services, information and activities for people with Limited English Proficiency (LEP), Roseville Transit uses the information obtained in a Four Factor Analysis to determine the specific language services that are appropriate. This analysis helps Roseville Transit to determine if it communicates effectively with LEP persons and informs language access planning.
The complete Four Factor Analysis used to develop the Language Assistance Plan (LAP) is provided in Appendix E. The LAP includes the results of the Four Factor Analysis which is a local assessment and consideration of the following:
10 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by Roseville Transit;
2. The frequency with which LEP persons come into contact with Roseville Transit services and programs;
3. The nature and importance of Roseville Transit services and programs in people’s lives;
4. The resources available to Roseville Transit for LEP outreach, as well as the costs associated with that outreach.
The results of conducting the Four Factor Analysis using the latest data from the U.S.
Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) relating to use of Roseville Transit services and programs indicate that LEP persons make up 5.25% of the population in Roseville, or 8,678 people over 5 years of age. The language used by the highest percentage of the LEP population Spanish (
1.9%). While there are other
languages spoken in the city by LEP population, it is 3.35% combined for all other languages as shown in the following table. A detailed overview of Roseville demographics from the 2024 Census Bureau is shown in Appendix F: Demographic Data.
Roseville Limited English Proficiency Population
Total Population (ages 5 and
over) 165,216
Language LEP Population % of Total Population
1.9%
.83% 1,378
.81%
Spanish
Indo-European
Russian, Polish and Slavic
Other and unspecified
languages
1,342
1.71%
Total 8,678 5.25%
Source: American Community Survey 2024, 5-year estimates Moreover
, employees of the City of Roseville and MV Transportation who come into contact with the general public and passengers of Roseville Transit have not reported that English is a barrier to understanding the programs and services offered by Roseville Transit, other than Spanish speaking individuals. This information is also confirmed by review of the Language Line Translation requests and a log kept at the Alternative Transportation Division office documenting the number of customers at the front counter requiring language assistance (see Appendix F2). 3,140
2,818
11 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
To minimize language barriers and to better communicate information important to using Roseville Transit services and programs, a number of steps were identified that Roseville Transit has implemented. The following resources provided by Roseville Transit to all persons who speak other languages include:
• Lan
guage Card – Bus Drivers equipped with language card to assist passenger ability to indicate language needs
• Language Translation Line –Telephone service to assist in translation for employees to assist customers
• Online translation on the City’s website – service to assist customers in translating written information
In addition, the following materials are provided in Spanish, since Spanish is the highest percentage of speaking population which reports speaking English less than well in Roseville. Employees are trained in how to make use of tools provided to assist in communicating transit services. Available resources provided by Roseville Transit include, but not limited to:
• Civ
il Rights Complaint Form – translated into Spanish and provided on board buses, on website, and in administrative office lobby
• ADA Eligibility Application – translated into Spanish • Spanish Speaking Customer Service Representatives – provided both in the administrative office and in the operations office for Dispatch and Demand Response phone calls and emails
• ADA Service Information – translated into Spanish and provided in the Service Guide(s) and on website
• Notices placed on-board buses – translated into Spanish • Local Transit Service Information – translated into Spanish and provided in the Service Guide(s) and on website
• Spanish phrase book – provided to all bus drivers to assist in providing on board information to Spanish speaking passengers
VII. Decision Making Committees and Councils
T
he City of Roseville is committed to providing an open and visible decision-making process to which the public has equal access. The City Council makes the decisions regarding policy, service changes, fares, capital programming and facility locations for
12 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Roseville Transit. The City Council members are elected officials, and therefore, are not subject to Title VI requirements.
The City of Roseville has established 13 boards and commissions for the specific purpose of soliciting and involving public input as part of any decision-making process.
Of these, the City of Roseville Transportation Commission reviews and makes recommendations to the City Council regarding transportation items that receive Federal funding. The Transportation Commission is composed of seven members who are residents of the City of Roseville. Appointments are made by the City Council for overlapping four-year terms. No member of the Transportation Commission shall serve more than two consecutive terms. In addition, the City Council may annually appoint a high school student that is a resident of Roseville to serve as an 8th voting member of the Transportation Commission.
To encourage a diverse range of public participation, the City of Roseville sends notices of commission vacancies to the Chamber of Commerce, the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhoods Association (RCONA), and publishes advertisements in the Roseville Press Tribune and on the City website.
A. Commission Racial Breakdown
The City of Roseville current Transportation Commission is comprised of the following members representing the following races.
Transportation
Commission
White
Black or
African
American
American
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
Asian
Native
Hawaiian
and
Other
Pacific
Islander
Other
Two
or
more
races
Did not
Respond
Commissioners 42.9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 57.1%
VIII. Subrecipient Compliance
As a primary recipient of FTA funds with subrecipients Roseville Transit shall undertake the following activities:
13 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
• Document the process for ensuring that all subrecipients are complying with the general reporting requirement, as well as other requirements that apply to the subrecipient based on the type of entity and the number of fixed route vehicles it operates in peak service.
• Collect Title VI Programs from subrecipients and review programs for compliance.
On behalf of the City of Lincoln, the City of Roseville secured Section 5309 for their construction of a bus barn via FTA grant CA 03-0772 (closed 9/23/13). Construction of the bus barn was completed in 2010, with final FTA disbursement in 2011. The City of Lincoln has since partnered with Placer County Transit to operate three (3) Local fixed routes and one dial-a-ride paratransit service within its jurisdictional boundaries. Placer County Transit and Roseville Transit are both members of the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA). As a member of the PCTPA Transit Operators Working Group (TOWG), Placer County Transit along with other transit operators, receives updates and participates in discussions of revised Title VI obligations.
City of Roseville staff:
• C
onducts periodic desk review of materials and Lincoln’s website; • Receives updates of Lincoln program modifications through TOWG meetings; and,
• Conducts a triennial site visit to discuss Title VI and other obligations required of sub-recipients of federal funding and to confirm and document the City of Lincoln’s compliance with applicable obligations.
M
aterial collected includes Lincoln Transit’s statement of their commitment to “ensuring no person is excluded from participation in or denied the benefits of its transit services or programs on the basis of race color or national origin as afforded under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” The statement of commitment is included on Lincoln’s website (Appendix G), and is also part of the Placer County Transit’s service guide distributed to passengers on board buses and is also available online. Instructions are also included for any person(s) who feels they have been discriminated against on how they may file a complaint with Placer County Department of Public Works or with the Federal Transportation Administration.
IX. Construction Equity Analysis
14 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
When Roseville Transit plans to construct or expand a facility, such as a vehicle storage facility, maintenance facility, transit hub or operation center, Roseville Transit will include a copy of the Title VI Equity Analysis conducted during the planning stage with regard to the location of the facility. The following principles will be applied in the analysis:
1. To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and low-income populations.
2. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decision- making process.
3. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and low-income populations.
Roseville Transit will follow federal guidance provided in FTA Circular 4703.1 (August 2012).
During the past three years, Roseville Transit has not constructed a vehicle storage, transit hub, operations center or maintenance facility.
X. Service Standards and Policies
Roseville Transit has developed a set of quantifiable service standards and policies.
These service standards and policies are developed through public involvement programs designed to ensure that all persons wishing to participate in its services are given equal and equitable opportunity to participate.
Service standards are identified in Roseville’s Short Range Transit Plan, adopted by the Roseville City Council in 2025. The public involvement program for this process included a series of outreach strategies designed to ensure equal and equitable opportunity to participate, including providing communications in formats to meet the needs of the public and offering meetings and outreach materials in convenient locations and formats for equitable access.
Both Roseville Transit’s Service Policies and the Short Range Transit Plan are adopted by the Roseville City Council though a public involvement program that includes public notices, opportunities to comment, and a minimum of one (1) public hearing. This process is designed to ensure that service design and operations do not result in discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin.
ൢ൦ City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
The Short Range Transit Plan includes a demographic analysis that informed public engagement strategies designed to engage a diverse community (see Appendix F for demographic data). Public participation included an onboard rider survey, a community survey, social media platforms, public notices, and a minimum of one public hearing.
Additionally, each year, Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) works with transit providers, including the City of Roseville, and the public to identify any transit needs that are not currently being met and makes a determination as to what needs are reasonable to meet. PCTPA solicits testimony through an inclusive public outreach process that includes, but is not limited to, the following: advertisements in the local newspapers, press releases and public service announcements, flyers in buses, and notices to social service agencies.
The City of Roseville Transportation Commission reviews and approves an annual year- end report that documents how well Roseville Transit meets the standards. Service standards are used as key performance indicators to help gauge different areas of performance for the entire Roseville Transit system. As such, these standards are used to identify trends and/or issues which should be addressed to improve overall system performance and to measurably identify successes. These service standards and policies include, but are not limited to those presented below.
A. Vehicle Loads and Passengers Per Hour Standards
Vehicle load is expressed as the ratio of passengers to the total number of seats on a vehicle at any moment. Vehicle load will also vary by route, time of day, and by season.
Service
Type
Vehicle
Type
(year)
Capacity
(Seated/
Standing/
Wheelchair)
Total
Capacity
Wheelchair
Preferred
Capacity
Average
Load
Wheelchair
Maximum
Load
Commuter Gillig- 40-ft
(2020) 39/32/3 74 1 .51 2
Commuter LF 40-ft
(2009) 39/32/2 73 1 .51 2
Arrow
Champion-
LF-26-ft
(2020)
17/8/3
28 1 NA NA
Arrow Arboc 26-ft
(2014) 17/8/3 28 1 NA NA
ൢ൧ City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Local Gillig LF-35-
ft (2020) 32/24/3 59 1 .21 2
Local Gillig LF 35-ft
(2017, 2014) 32/24/2 58 1 .28 2
Local Gillig LF 29-ft
(2009) 26/18/2 46 1 .28 2
Commuter Phoenix 40-
foot (2025) 35/30/2 67 1 .40 2
For passenger safety and comfort, vehicles should be sized and the transit service operated to limit typical peak loads to the seating capacity. Local fixed route and commuter services should generally limit standing loads to a maximum of 20 percent of daily runs on a single route.
Passengers per revenue hour is also a useful measure of vehicle use over the course of each hour of service. Below are general standards which are used to help gauge the average use of each service.
Local Services - The average number of passengers per revenue hour should be greater than or equal to 7 passengers per vehicle revenue hour.
Commuter Services - The average number of passengers per revenue hour should be greater than or equal to 20 passengers per vehicle revenue hour.
Dial-A-Ride/Arrow Services - The average number of passengers per revenue hour should be greater than or equal to 2.5 passengers per vehicle revenue hour.
These standards are considered targets. In general, the number of passengers per revenue hours will exceed the average in peak travel periods and will be less than the average during the first and last hour of service. Also, mid-weekdays tend to show higher averages than other days. The average number of passengers per revenue hour tends to be below the system average during the first year of any new route, but generally improves to meet or exceed the system average within a few years.
B. Vehicle Headway (Frequency) Standards
Local Services - Vehicle headway for local fixed route service is generally provided in 30 or 60 minute increments, and may vary depending upon demand.
17 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Commuter Services - Vehicle headway for commuter services range from 0-40 minutes, depending upon demand and the specific routing of each commuter bus during peak hours.
C. Service Span Standards
Local and Arrow Services - Generally, the span of service each week day is 5:45 a.m. to 6 p.m. for all local routes, and reduced service levels continue until 10 p.m. The span of service on Saturdays is from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and no local route service exists on Sundays. General public Arrow services are also available by reservation during these times. General public Arrow services are also generally available on Sundays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
The hours and days of Local and Arrow services are continuously adjusted to reflect demands while striving to attain other performance standards.
Commuter Services - The general service span for Commuter service is weekdays during peak travel times.
While the hours of peak travel do not vary greatly, the frequency of Commuter services from Roseville to Downtown Sacramento or other job centers will generally be determined by demand and an ability to meet other performance standards.
D. On-time Performance Standards
The standard for average on-time performance for all services is greater than or equal to 90%.
E. Fare Recovery and Average Subsidy Per Trip Standards Fare Recovery - The standard for average fare recovery traditionally has been greater than or equal to 15% of all transit operating expenses due to State requirements. The average subsidy per trip by type of service and by route is measured quarterly and/or annually to help evaluate the cost of services. However, since COVID, this 15% figure has been suspended until further notice.
Fare Recovery for New Services - These standards should not be strictly applied to new routes for the first two years of service. A 50 percent fare recovery of standard could be considered successful after one year, but a favorable trend thereafter should be maintained. Conversely, Roseville Transit should not simply keep a service if revenues
18 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
cannot support the continued operation of a route, or if a different and more successful route could replace the less successful route.
F. Bus Stops and Passenger Amenity Standards
Bus Stop Location and Spacing - Bus stops are generally encouraged to be spaced a maximum of ½ mile apart along both arterial and collector streets in both directions, and/or at each leg of an intersection between arterial/arterial and arterial/collector streets, depending upon road patterns, adjacent land uses and densities and other factors which may influence the accessibility and use of a stop.
Shelters and Seats - Shelters should be provided at all bus stops expected to serve 15 or more passengers per day, and passenger seating should be provided at all bus stops expected to serve five or more passengers per day. Further refinement of stops, passenger amenities and timed stop designations will occur after a route has begun service.
Amenity Removal - When the annual maintenance or repair cost of an amenity is excessive or greater than the value of the structure or amenity, or presents a safety risk, then Roseville Transit reserves the right to remove the amenity.
Route Travel Time - Bus routes are generally designed so that the travel time will not exceed 3 times the equivalent automobile trip during peak travel hours, and should be designed to function as efficiently as possible.
G. Service Availability and Connectivity Standards
Service Routes - Generally, Roseville Transit provides general public Dial-A-Ride, call Arrow within Roseville, services within its entire corporate boundaries. Also, Roseville Transit attempts to provide fixed route services within ½ mile walking distance of 90% of the daytime population within City boundaries. As new development is added, new local fixed route and commuter services will be added based upon demand and as funding permits.
Connecting Adjacent Land Uses - Adjacent uses should provide direct pedestrian access to planned and existing bus stop locations to facilitate use of public transit. New projects that would generate DAR trips, such as medical office buildings, should also consider site designs that would accommodate the DAR bus picking up and dropping off ADA passengers at or near front door locations with ADA accessibility to the front door.
Reciprocal Transfer Agreements and Regional Fare Cards -- Reciprocal transfer arrangements should continue to be implemented between all connecting service providers. Regional fare cards, such as Connect Card, should continue to be
19 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
implemented by Roseville Transit to improve regional connectivity and passenger mobility.
Regional Transfer Points - Local service should be provided within one block of all regional transit transfer locations and intercity bus/rail stops. Also, passenger facilities at regional transit transfer locations should be improved to enhance regional public transportation connections.
H. Safety, Maintenance and Replacement Standards
Accident Rates – The average preventable accident rate standard for all services is less than or equal to 1 preventable accident for every 50,000 service miles travelled. The average accident rate standard for all accidents for all services is less than or equal to 1 accident (preventable and non-preventable) for 25,000 service miles travelled.
Road Calls – The average road call standard is less or equal to 1 road call for every 10,000 service miles travelled.
Programmed Vehicle Maintenance – The standard for vehicle maintenance is for 90% percent of all programmed maintenance to occur within scheduled parameters.
Vehicle Replacement – Vehicles should be replaced at the end of their useful lives according to FTA guidelines and industry accepted practices for public fleet operators.
The average fleet age should not exceed six (6) years.
I. Customer Service Standards
Employee Training – All employees should receive annual customer service training to ensure courteous, safe and respectful behavior, and that employees are sensitive to the needs of passengers.
Local and Commuter Services – The standard for the average number of passenger complaints for Local and Commuter services is less than or equal to 1 validated complaint for every 5,000 passenger trips.
Dial-A-Ride (DAR) – The standard for the average number of passenger complaints for DAR services is less than or equal to 1 validated complaint for every 3,000 passenger trips.
J. Vehicle Assignment Policy
20 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Roseville Transit assigns vehicles based on the type of service, capacity, and vehicle mileage. Local fixed routes are assigned 30-foot or 35-foot buses. Commuter routes are assigned 40-foot buses. Paratransit service and Arrow service requiring tight turns on driveways are operated with 26-foot cut-a-way vehicles. Occasionally, when necessary due to vehicle maintenance, vehicle types may be assigned to an alternate service, if feasible.
As Roseville Transit begins operating Zero-Emission buses (ZEB), ZEBs will be assigned based on the operating characteristics of the route. Assignments for ZEBs will take into consideration the state of charge of the battery and charge needed to complete the route(s).
All vehicles are equipped with air conditioning.
XI. Requirements for Fixed Route Transit Providers
Chapter 4 of FTA Circular 4702.1B discusses the additional reporting requirements for recipients of FTA funding (including their sub-recipients) that operate fixed route transit services, in order to ensure that the agency complies with DOT Title VI regulations. The requirements only apply to fixed route service, not demand response service. Per Circular 4702.1B definitions, “Fixed route refers to public transportation service provided in vehicles operated along pre- determined routes according to a fixed schedule”. As of January 1, 2026, Roseville Transit has a fixed-route fleet of 43 buses. Therefore, Roseville Transit qualifies for a reduced level of Chapter 4 reporting and is only required to set system-wide standards and policies.
21 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix A: City Council Approval
22 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
[Insert Resolution]
23 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix B: Title VI Notice to the Public
Title VI Notice to the Public (English, Spanish & Russian)
Website Screen Shots on www.roseville.ca.us/titlevi
/0
/1
/2/3/4/5/6/7 /8
/9
/0/1 /2
/3/4
/0
/1
/2/3/4/5/6/7 /8
/9
/10/11/12/13/14/15/12/16/17/18/i255/16/20/21/i255/22/23/24/25/26/27/28 /29/30/20/31/i255/20/11/32/33/32/13/12/15 /34/35/16/32/20/13/14/i255/36
/0
/1 /2/3/4/5/6 /7
/8
/9/10/11/12/13/14/11/15/16/17/i255/15/19/20/i255/21/22/23/23/24/25/26 /27/28/19/29/i255/19/10/30/31/30/12/11/14 /32/33/15/30/19/12/13/i255/34
27 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix C: Title VI Complaint Forms (English and Spanish)
Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964
Notification &
Complaint Form
Roseville Transit
Public Works – Alternative Transportation
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 774-5293
roseville.ca.us/transit
Where do I submit a complaint?
City of Roseville
Alternative Transportation
Civil Rights Officer
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone: (916) 774-5293 • TDD: (916) 774-5220
[email protected]
Federal Transit Administration
Office of Civil Rights
Attention: Complaint Team
East Building, 5th Floor – TCR
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
Phone: 1-888-446-4511
[email protected]
What happens after I submit a
complaint to the City of Roseville?
A written notice of receipt shall be sent to the
complainant within five days of receipt of the
complaint.
If further information is required to investigate
the case, the Civil Rights Officer will contact the
complainant in writing. The complainant has 30
business days to submit the requested informa-
tion. Once all requested information is received,
the Civil Rights Officer has 60 days to make a
determination. If the requested information is not
received within 30 business days from the date of
the request, the Civil Rights Officer can adminis-
tratively close the case.
If the complainant wishes to appeal the Civil Rights
Officer’s decision, the complainant shall make an
appeal request in writing within 10 business days
of receipt of the Civil Rights Officer’s decision.
An appeal of the decision will be heard by the
decision-making body per the Roseville Municipal
Code at the next available scheduled meeting.
What is a Title VI complaint?
Roseville Transit operates its programs and
services without regard to race, color, and
national origin in accordance with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Any person who believes
she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful
discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a
complaint with Roseville Transit.
Federal law requires Title VI complaints be filed
within 180 calendar days of the last alleged
incident.
How do I file a complaint?
1. Complete the form on the reverse side and
return it to the City of Roseville Alternative
Transportation office.
or
2. File a complaint with the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA). Visit transit.dot.gov
or call 1-888-446-44511 for more information.
Submit a signed written statement to the
FTA that contains the following information:
a. Complainant’s name, address, and
telephone number.
b. If you are filing on behalf of another person,
include their name, address, telephone
number, your relationship to the person,
and if you have their permission to file the
complaint.
c. Name of the public transit provider the
complaint is against.
d. Describe the complaint. Include specific
details such as names, dates, times, route
numbers/letters, witnesses, and any other
information that would assist in the
investigation of your allegation.
Roseville Transit operates its programs and
services without regard to race, color, and
national origin in accordance with Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Any person who believes
she or he has been aggrieved by any unlawful
discriminatory practice under Title VI may file a
complaint with Roseville Transit.
“No person in the United States shall, on the ground
of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any program or
activity receiving Federal financial assistance. ”
(42 U.S.C. Section 2000d)
Limited English proficiency
If you have difficulty understanding English, you
may request language assistance phone services
free of charge. Please contact us for details.
Roseville Transit Title VI Complaint Form
Please complete this form and mail, email [email protected], or deliver in person to the Roseville Transit Civil Rights Officer, Alternative Transportation office at 316 Vernon Street, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678.
Section 1
Name (Complainant): Mr. Mrs. Ms. Miss Mailing Address: Apt.:
City: State: Zip:
Phone: E-mail:
Section 2
Are you filing out this form on your own behalf? Yes No If you answered “No” , please supply your name and relationship to the person listed in Section 1.
Name:
Relationship:
Please explain why you are filing an incident form on their behalf.
Have you obtained permission to file this form on their behalf? Yes No Section 3
Basis of alleged discrimination: Race Color National Origin Section 4
Type of service:
Commuter Arrow Local Phone Other Date of alleged discrimination (month/day/year): Time:
Staff: Route: Bus #:
Boarding location: Destination location:
Describe the situation you would like to report. Use additional paper if necessary.
Please list any person(s) we may contact for additional information:
Name: Address: Phone:
Section 5
Have you previously filed a Title VI complaint with Roseville Transit? Yes No Did you file this complaint with another federal, state or local agency; or with a federal or state court? Yes No Which agency: Date filed:
Section 6
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information I have provided is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Signature Date of filing Rev. 2/11/2026
Título VI del Acta
de Derechos Civiles
de 1964
Notificación y
Forma de Queja
¿Dónde presento una queja?
Ciudad de Roseville
Transportación Alternativa
Oficial de Derechos Civiles
316 Vernon Street, Suite150
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 774-5293
TDD: (916) 774-5220
[email protected]
Administración Federal de Tránsito
Oficina de Derechos Civiles
Atención: Equipo de quejas
East Building, 5th Floor – TCR
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
1-888-446-4511
[email protected]
Visite transit.dot.gov para información
adicional acerca de obligaciones de Título VI
de proveedores de tránsito público.
¿Qué es una queja de Título VI?
El Tránsito de Roseville opera sus programas y
servicios sin considerar la raza, color, y origen
nacional en conformidad con el Título VI del
Acta de Derechos Civiles. Cualquier persona
quien cree ella/él ha sido ofendido por cualquier
práctica discriminatoria ilegal bajo el Título VI
puede presentar una queja con el Tránsito de
Roseville.
La ley Federal requiere que quejas de Títle VI sean
sometidas dentro de 180 días de calendario del
último supuesto incidente.
¿Cómo presento una queja?
1. Complete la forma al lado reverso y regrésela
a la Oficina de Transportación Alternativa de la
Ciudad de Roseville.
o
2. Presente una queja con la Administración
Federal de Tránsito (FTA). Visite transit.dot.gov
para más información.
Someta una declaración firmada por escrito a
la FTA que contiene la siguiente información:
a. Nombre del reclamante, domicilio, y
número de teléfono.
b. Si está presentando por medio de otra
persona, incluya el nombre, domicilio,
número de teléfono, su parentesco a la
persona, y si tiene su permiso de presentar
la queja.
c. Nombre del provedor de tránsito public del
cual la queja es en contra.
d. Describa la queja. Incluya detalles
epecíficos tal cómo nombres, fechas, horas,
números/letras de ruta, testigos, y cualquier
otra información que nos pudiera asistir en
la investigación de su alegación.
El Tránstio de Roseville cumple con el Acta de los
Derechos Civiles de 1964 que declara, “Ninguna
persona en los Estados Unidos será, por motivos
de raza, color, u origen nacional, excluido de
participación en, ser negado los beneficios de, o ser
sujetado a discriminación bajo cualquier programa
o actividad recibiendo asistencia financiera Federal. ” (42 U.S.C. Sección 2000d)
El Tránsito de Roseville opera sus programas y
servicios sin considerar la raza, color, y origen
nacional en conformidad con el Título VI del
Acta de Derechos Civiles. Cualquier persona
quien cree ella/él ha sido ofendido por cualquier
práctica discriminatoria ilegal bajo el Título VI
puede presentar una queja con el Tránsito de
Roseville.
Tránsito de Roseville
Transportación Alternativa
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
(916) 774-5293
roseville.ca.us/transit
Dominio limitado del inglés
Si tiene dificultades para entender inglés,
puede solicitar servicios telefónicos de
asistencia con el idioma de forma gratuita.
Por favor, contáctenos para más detalles.
Tránsito de Roseville Título VI Forma de Queja
Por favor complete esta forma y mándela por correo, email [email protected] o la puede regresar en persona al Oficial de Derechos Civiles de Tránsito de Roseville, 316 Vernon Street, Suite 150, Roseville, CA 95678.
Sección 1
Nombre (Reclamante): Sr. Sra. Srta.
Domicilio: Apto.:
Ciudad: Estado: Zona Postal:
Teléfono: E-mail:
Sección 2
¿Esta presentando esta forma por su propio medio? Sí No Si contestó “No” , por favor dé su nombre y parentesco a la persona alistada en la Sección 1.
Nombre:
Parentesco:
Por favor explique por qué está presentando una forma de incidente por medio de ellos.
¿Ha obtenido permiso para entregar esta forma por medio de ellos? Sí No Sección 3
Motivo de supuesta discriminación: Raza Color Origen Nacional Sección 4
Tipo de servicio:
Conmutor Dial-A-Ride Local Teléfono Otro Fecha de último supuesto incidente: Hora:
Personal: Ruta: # de Autobús:
Ubicación de Abordar: Destinación/Parada de Autobús:
Describa la situación que quiere reportar. Use papel adicional si es necesario.
Por favor aliste cualquier persona(s) con quienes nos podemos poner en contacto para información adicional:
Nombre: Domicilio: Teléfono:
Sección 5
¿Alguna vez ha presentado una queja del Título VI de Tránsito de Roseville? Sí No ¿Presentó esta queja con otra agencia federal, estatal o local; o con una corte federal o estatal? Sí No Agencia: Fecha sometida:
Sección 6
Yo declaro bajo pena de perjurio bajo las leyes del Estado de California que la información que he proveido es verdadera y correcta según mi mejor conocimiento.
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________ Firma Fecha de sumisión Rev. 8/1/2022
32 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix D: Public Participation Plan
33 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN
Adopted: August 22, 2022, Revised XXX, 2026
Prepared by:
City of Roseville
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
roseville.ca.us/transit
Please direct comments/questions to:
City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division at (916) 774-5293 or [email protected]
34 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Table of Contents
Section
I. Purpose and Goals
II. Background
III. Public Involvement Plan
A. Applicability of Public Involvement Plan
B. Public Involvement Strategies
C. Public Notification
D. Logistics for Public Meetings
E. Documentation of Public Comments
F. Public Notification
IV. Periodic Review of Public Participation Plan
35 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
I. Purpose & Goals
Purpose
As a recipient of federal transportation funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the City of Roseville (COR) is required to develop a Public Participation Plan (PPP) that implements the goals and objectives of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states:
No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
This PPP is intended to provide guidance for public involvement activities to be conducted by COR in the expenditure of FTA funds in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and FTA Circular 4702.1B (“Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients”).
Goals
The procedures, strategies and techniques contained in this PPP support the purpose stated above and the following goals:
• Provide an open and visible decision-making process to which all members of the public have equal access;
• Seek out and consider the viewpoints of minorities, low income persons, persons with limited English proficiency, and other community groups; • Offer early and continuous opportunities for the public to be involved in the identification of social, economic, physical and environmental impacts of proposed decisions; and,
• Raise the level of community participation by citizens for the purpose of improving and maintaining the quality of life within the City of Roseville.
II.
Background
Public Participation in Roseville
The City of Roseville has a long-standing commitment to providing open and visible decision-making processes that provide equal access to all. Two in-person methods Roseville uses to promote public involvement are:
1. Boards and Commissions – The City of Roseville has established 16 boards and commissions for the specific purpose of soliciting and involving public input
36 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
as part of any decision-making process. Of these, the Transportation Commission typically has responsibility for oversight of FTA-funded transportation projects, plans and services.
2. Roseville Coalition of Neighborhood Associations - The City of Roseville established the Roseville Coalition of Neighborhoods Association (RCONA) in 1993. RCONA is a not-for-profit, non-partisan umbrella organization comprised of representatives of Roseville’s individual “Neighborhood Associations”. There are currently 42 Neighborhood Associations, each of which geographically represents a defined area of the City’s entire corporate boundaries, as shown at the RCONA web site: rcona.org. Two clearly stated purposes of the mission of the RCONA are:
• To raise the level of community participation by citizens for the purpose of improving and maintaining the quality of life within the City of Roseville; and,
• To work with neighborhood associations in resolving social, physical and economic problems within neighborhood, and deal with other important neighborhood issues
The City of Roseville will incorporate the use of these existing engagement resources into this PPP. This PPP will also consider other measures to solicit the involvement of citizens in the public decision-making process.
Public Participation for the Metropolitan Transportation Plan - Any transportation project in the six-county region using federal and state funding must be incorporated into the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (MTP/SCS).
The MTP/SCS is updated once every four years. For each update, SACOG develops a Public Participation Plan to assist SACOG staff in implementing an effective public review process of the MTP and the projects contained therein. This is another opportunity for the public to participate in transportation planning efforts in Roseville and the six-county region. For more information on the MTP/SCS and the SACOG Public Participation Plan, see this website: sacog.org/2035.
III. Public Involvement Plan
The primary means of implementing the goals of the PPP shall be the development and execution of a Public Involvement Plan (PIP) for applicable transit plans, projects or activities. The PIP shall be developed at the outset of the project planning process and shall be modified as needed during the planning process. The PIP shall be designed in accordance with the following principles:
37 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
1. The PIP shall be tailored to the scope of the proposed plan, project or activity, the population of the planning or project impact area, and the resources available for outreach.
2. The PIP will be designed to eliminate barriers to active participation and shall seek out the viewpoints of minority, low-income, LEP and other populations consistent with Title VI Program Executive Order 13166 and U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) LEP Guidance.
3. The PIP will be developed at the beginning of each planning process to provide early opportunities for public involvement in the identification of project, plan and activity goals and community needs, benefits and impacts.
4. Public notification will be provided throughout the planning process, including at key decision points and for public meetings.
The PIP for each transit plan, project and activity shall include public involvement strategies tailored to the scope of the proposed plan, project or activity and methods of public notification appropriate to the particular plan, project or activity.
A. Applicability of Public Involvement Plans
A PIP shall be prepared for the following activities undertaken by the COR:
1. Adoption or substantial modification of transit plans
2. Approval of FTA-funded capital improvement projects
3. Fare changes
4. Major service changes as defined below:
• The elimination or addition of a transit line or service • A route change that impacts 25% or more of a route’s miles or bus stops • A reduction or increase of service or frequency of service that affects 25% or more of the total transit system revenue miles
• Proposed changes that are reasonably anticipated to be controversial with or substantially affect an identified stakeholder, neighborhood or community group or population
Service changes not falling under the definition of a major service change are considered minor changes that may be approved by the Alternative Transportation Manager without the implementation of a PIP.
38 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
B. Public Involvement Strategies
During development of the PIP, the following public involvement strategies may be used as appropriate to the activity being undertaken to identify public needs, concerns and comments:
Email/text message notifications
Social media
Website
News media
Collateral materials
Signage
Advertisements
Informal Meetings with community groups
Formal presentations to community groups
Interactive Public Workshops (Visioning, Scenario Planning, etc.) Project Open Houses
Special Advisory Committees
Focus Groups
Public Surveys
Public Hearings
The above list is considered a menu of strategies to obtain public input. The PIP for each particular activity subject to this PPP will be tailored to use the most appropriate strategies for achieving public involvement for the given activity. The PIP for a particular activity may incorporate some or all of the above strategies.
As appropriate to the particular activity, the PIP may incorporate supplemental outreach strategies to seek out the viewpoints of minority, low-income, and Limited English Proficient (LEP) populations;
Partner with community organizations to engage members of the public who are less likely to attend traditional public meetings (including LEP populations) through means such as surveys and focus groups.
Attend community events.
Attend meetings and activities organized by faith-based organizations, advocacy groups, or other community partners that will help solicit feedback from diverse members of the public.
Develop and maintain a “Community Partner List”, which identifies community partners and organizations that may be targeted for public outreach based upon the scope of the particular project, plan or activity. The community partner list may include the following types of groups and organizations:
o Lower Income Individuals/Households
39 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
o Minorities
o Limited English Proficient Individuals/Groups
o Persons with Disabilities and Limited Mobility
o Native American Organizations and Tribal Councils
o Senior Citizens
o RCONA and Neighborhood Associations
o Community Service Organizations
o Faith-based Organizations
o Affordable Housing Advocates
o Environmental Advocates
o Home Builder Organizations
o Business Organizations
o Commercial Property Interests
o Landowners
o Other Public Agencies
C. Public Hearings
A minimum of one (1) public hearing shall be required for fare changes and major service changes and may be required for other plans, projects and activities as required by local, state and federal law, such as the California Environmental Quality Act.
Public hearings will be scheduled as part of a regular Transportation Commission or City Council meeting. Notification of public hearings shall, at a minimum, be as required by the applicable local, state or federal law. In addition, public hearings should be held more broadly through other means as identified in the PIP.
D. Logistics for Public Meetings
The following should be considered when planning public workshops and meetings:
• Public meetings, workshops and hearings should be held at convenient and accessible locations, with consideration of access to transit and ease of access for target audience. When local transit does not provide service due to the meeting location or time, the City of Roseville advertises the availability of free Arrow service to the meeting.
• Meeting rooms should be large enough for the anticipated audience • Meeting locations should be accessible to persons with disabilities • Meeting times should consider the work schedules, school schedules, rush hours, meal hours, religious worship hours and other characteristics of target audience
• Virtual meetings may be used with call-in numbers
40 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
• If needed, a specific employee shall be designated to accommodate the needs of persons who are linguistically or culturally isolated, as well as persons with disabilities
E. Documentation of Public Comments
Public comments received during the public outreach and involvement process will be compiled in writing in either meeting notes, minutes or as otherwise appropriate. The comments will be forwarded to the applicable advisory committee, commission or City Council for review and consideration in the decision-making process. A summary of the public comments received will be provided as part of a staff report submitted to the Transportation Commission and/or City Council. Per FTA Circular 4702.1B (IV-10); the staff report to the Transportation Commission and/or City Council shall include an evaluation of whether or not the proposed fare change or major service change will have a discriminatory impact based on race, color, or national origin.
F. Public Notification
The PIP shall identify the appropriate methods of public notification for transit plans, projects and activities covered by this PPP. When necessary, information materials shall be made available and distributed in English and Spanish.
For all projects, notifications methods may include as appropriate to the project:
C ity website
Email and text message notifications to subscriber lists and/or groups/individuals Social media
Local news media (including ethnic media, as appropriate) Advertisement(s) (including ethnic media, as appropriate) Legal Notice(s) as required by local, state and federal agencies Direct mail
Post m eeting agendas for advisory committee(s), Transportation Commission, City Council
Post fliers/signage at community facilities (libraries, senior centers, human service organizations, schools, etc.) and transit facilities (e.g. transit centers, bus shelters, on board buses, and Roseville Transit offices) All fliers and other collateral materials shall specify that any interested individual is invited to make comments. The public notification shall also specify the methods for submittal of comments, with appropriate contact information included. Typically, public comments may be submitted in the following manners:
• Email
• Direct mail
41 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
• In person at locations specified in the notice/flier
• At public hearings, informational meetings, open houses and workshops • By telephone to City representatives
V. Periodic Review of Public Participation Plan
Every 3 years or more frequently as determined necessary by the COR, the COR will review the effectiveness of the public engagement process and the procedures and strategies contained in this PPP. The goal of this review will be to ensure a full and open participation process. The PPP will be revised as appropriate based upon this periodic review.
42 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix E: Language Assistance Plan
City of Roseville
Alternative Transportation Division
Language Assistance Plan
2026
Prepared in compliance with Executive Order 13166, "Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency," and Federal Transit Administration Circular 4702.1B, Chapter III.
Background
This Language Assistance Plan (LAP) addresses the City of Roseville Alternative Transportation Division’s obligation as a recipient of federal transit funds to provide meaningful access to programs, activities, and services for individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). This plan documents the results of a Four-Factor Analysis conducted in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Circular 4702.1B and Executive Order 13166, and describes the language assistance measures that the City of Roseville provides to LEP populations within its transit service area.
The City of Roseville contracts with MV Transportation (MV) to operate Roseville Transit fixed- route and demand-response services. This plan covers the responsibilities of both Alternative Transportation staff and Roseville Transit operational staff in providing language assistance to LEP individuals.
Limited English Proficiency Defined
A Limited English Proficiency (LEP) person, as defined by the FTA, is a person for whom English is not their primary language and who has a limited ability to speak, understand, read, or write English. This includes people who reported to the U.S. Census Bureau that they speak English “less than very well.”
Safe Harbor Provision
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Safe Harbor provision, consistent with DOT LEP Guidance (70 FR 74087, December 14, 2005), stipulates that a recipient of federal funds is considered to have provided written translation of vital documents when the recipient provides written translations for each eligible LEP language group that constitutes 5% or 1,000 persons, whichever is less, of the total population of persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered. Translation of vital documents into languages meeting this threshold creates a “Safe Harbor” for the recipient with regard to the translation obligation under the DOT LEP Guidance.
Four-Factor Analysis
Factor 1: Number and Proportion of LEP Persons in the Service Area Alternative Transportation staff reviewed the most recent U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2020–2024 Five-Year Estimates (Table C16001: Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over) to identify LEP language groups within the Roseville Transit service area.
The total population age 5 and over in the Roseville service area is 165,216. Of this population, 8,678 persons (5.25%) speak English “less than very well” and are classified as LEP. The following table presents LEP populations by language group:
Language Group LEP Persons % of Pop. 5+ Safe Harbor
Spanish 3,140 1.90% YES
Other Indo-European Languages 1,378 0.83% YES
Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic
Languages
1,342 0.81% YES
Tagalog/Filipino 931 0.56% No
Chinese (incl. Mandarin, Cantonese) 458 0.28% No
Other Asian and Pacific Island
Languages
420 0.25% No
Arabic 244 0.15% No
Vietnamese 198 0.12% No
Other and Unspecified Languages 192 0.12% No
Korean 172 0.10% No
German or Other West Germanic
Languages
102 0.06% No
French, Haitian, or Cajun 101 0.06% No
Total LEP Population 8,678 5.25%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2020–2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Table C16001.
Geography: Census tracts within the City of Roseville, Placer County, California.
Three language groups meet the DOT Safe Harbor threshold of 1,000 or more LEP persons:
• Spanish — 3,140 LEP persons (1.90% of population 5+)
• Other Indo-European Languages — 1,378 LEP persons (0.83%) • Russian, Polish, or Other Slavic Languages — 1,342 LEP persons (0.81%) Tagalog/Filipino (931 LEP persons) approaches but does not currently meet the Safe Harbor threshold and should be monitored in future updates to this plan.
Language services needed by current programs and services involve these three Safe Harbor language groups, with Spanish-speaking individuals representing the largest LEP population in the service area.
Factor 2: Frequency of Contact with LEP Persons
Alternative Transportation staff conducted a survey of front-line personnel to assess the frequency with which LEP individuals come into contact with Roseville Transit programs, activities, and services. The survey found the following:
• Alternative Transportation front counter staff come into contact with approximately one (1) LEP individual or fewer per month requiring interpreter assistance. • Roseville Transit reservationists and dispatchers come into contact with approximately five (5) LEP callers per month requiring interpreter assistance. • Roseville Transit drivers come into contact with approximately fifty (50) LEP customers per month requiring interpreter assistance.
The majority of LEP contacts involve Spanish-speaking individuals. Contact with speakers of Russian, Slavic, and other Indo-European languages is less frequent but occurs regularly through the customer service line and at bus stops. The frequency of contact with LEP persons demonstrates an ongoing need for language assistance services across all points of customer interaction.
Factor 3: Nature and Importance of Programs, Activities, and Services Roseville Transit provides essential public transportation services that connect residents to employment, medical care, education, shopping, and other daily needs. Denial or delay of access to these services due to language barriers can have serious consequences for LEP individuals, particularly those without access to private transportation. The following points of contact involve services of particular importance to LEP populations:
• Alternative Transportation front counter staff assist customers with trip planning, pass sales, discount photo identification cards, ADA eligibility inquiries, Title VI complaint intake, and general information about Roseville Transit services. • Roseville Transit dispatchers assist customers with Dial-A-Ride reservations, trip planning, service inquiries, and real-time information. • Roseville Transit drivers assist passengers with fare questions, route guidance, trip planning, and ADA accommodation on board vehicles.
• Public meetings and hearings provide opportunities for community input on service changes, fare changes, and planning decisions that may affect LEP communities.
Factor 4: Resources Available and Overall Cost
The City of Roseville and its transit contractor maintain the following language assistance resources:
• City Employee Translators: The City of Roseville employs approved translators in Spanish, American Sign Language, Romanian, Tagalog, Arabic, Italian, and Punjabi.
These translators are available across various City departments and can be accessed by Alternative Transportation staff as needed.
• AT&T Language Line: All City of Roseville employees have access to the AT&T Language Line, a telephonic interpretation service that provides real-time interpretation in over 200 languages via speakerphone. This service is available to both Alternative Transportation and Roseville Transit staff for immediate assistance with LEP customers. • I-Speak Cards: Alternative Transportation staff maintains “I-Speak” language identification cards in 38 languages. These cards allow staff to quickly identify the
language spoken by an LEP visitor and connect them with appropriate interpretation services.
• Website Translation: The City of Roseville website (roseville.ca.us) provides automatic translation into all Safe Harbor languages and many additional languages. All transit information published on the City website, including service guides, schedules, fare information, Title VI materials, and public notices, is accessible in translated form through this feature.
• Bilingual Transit Staff: MV Transportation employs Spanish-speaking dispatchers and drivers. A Spanish-speaking dispatcher is available Monday through Friday during morning hours. MV Transportation makes efforts to assign bilingual drivers to routes that serve areas with higher concentrations of LEP populations. Additionally, MV Transportation employs drivers and operations staff who speak Russian, Slavic, and other Indo-European languages, supporting the City’s ability to serve all three Safe Harbor language groups at the point of service.
• Automated Phone System: The Roseville Transit customer service line ((916) 745- 7560 / (530) 745-7560) offers callers the option to hear menus in Spanish.
Vital Documents Translation
The following documents are identified as “vital documents” for the purposes of this Language Assistance Plan. Vital documents are those that contain information critical to accessing Roseville Transit services or exercising rights under federal civil rights protections. The City of Roseville provides or makes available translations of these documents in all Safe Harbor languages:
Vital Document Spanish Russian / Slavic / Indo-
European
Roseville Transit Service Guides (Local,
Dial-A-Ride, Commuter)
Available (since 2000) Available via website
translation
ADA Complementary Paratransit Services
Guide
Available (since 2016) Available via website
translation
ADA Application and Correspondence Available (since 2002) Available via website translation
Civil Rights and Complaint Procedure Available (since 2010) Available via website translation
Title VI Notice to the Public Available Available via website translation
Title VI Complaint Form Available Available via website translation
Service Change Notices Available (since 2008) Available via website translation
Bus Stop Closure Notices Available (since 2009) Available via website translation
Fare Information and Policies Available Available via website translation
Public Hearing and Meeting Notices Available Available via website translation
Alternative Transportation staff will continue to produce print-format transit materials in Spanish, which represents the largest LEP population. For Russian, Slavic, and other Indo-European languages, vital documents are made available through the City’s website translation feature, which provides on-demand translation of all published transit materials. Customers may also request printed translations of specific documents through the Alternative Transportation office, which will be fulfilled using City translation resources or professional translation services.
Notice to LEP Populations
The following statement is included in Roseville Transit Service Guides, Title VI Brochures, and the Title VI webpage:
Limited English Proficiency
If you have difficulty understanding English, you may request language assistance services free of charge. Please contact us for more information.
Alternative Transportation
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone: (916) 774-5293
LEP Complaint Procedure
Any person who believes they have been denied the benefits of, excluded from participation in, or subjected to discrimination on the basis of national origin (including limited English proficiency) in connection with any Roseville Transit program, activity, or service may file a complaint with the Alternative Transportation Division.
Complaints may be filed in any language. Alternative Transportation staff will use available translation and interpretation resources to process complaints received in languages other than English. The Title VI Complaint Form is available in Spanish in print and in all Safe Harbor languages through the City’s website translation feature. Complaints may be submitted in writing, by phone with interpreter assistance through the AT&T Language Line, or in person at the Alternative Transportation office.
Complaints should be directed to:
Title VI Coordinator
Alternative Transportation Division
316 Vernon Street, Suite 150
Roseville, CA 95678
Phone: (916) 774-5293
Staff Training
Alternative Transportation Staff
• All staff are trained on the provisions of this Language Assistance Plan, including the identification of Safe Harbor languages and the obligation to provide meaningful access to LEP individuals.
• Staff are informed of available translation and interpretation resources, including the AT&T Language Line, City employee translators, I-Speak cards, and website translation. • Staff are instructed to document all language assistance requests using standardized tracking forms.
• Staff receive the training booklet “Basic Spanish for Transit Employees” containing basic Spanish words and phrases for common transit interactions.
Roseville Transit (MV Transportation) Staff
• MV Transportation management staff are informed of this Language Assistance Plan and their obligations to provide language assistance to LEP customers. • MV Transportation management staff are instructed to document all language assistance requests using tracking forms provided by Alternative Transportation staff. • Drivers who are not bilingual and encounter an LEP passenger are trained to contact dispatch or a bilingual driver for assistance.
• MV Transportation makes efforts to recruit and retain bilingual employees, particularly in Spanish and other Safe Harbor languages.
Monitoring and Updating the LAP
Alternative Transportation staff will monitor the implementation and effectiveness of this Language Assistance Plan on an ongoing basis through the following activities:
• Review language assistance request tracking data from both Alternative Transportation and Roseville Transit staff on a quarterly basis to identify trends in language demand and emerging language needs.
• Periodically survey Roseville Transit drivers and dispatchers to assess whether additional language services are necessary.
• Review updated American Community Survey data as new estimates become available to assess changes in the LEP population and determine whether additional language groups meet the Safe Harbor threshold.
• Monitor the Tagalog/Filipino LEP population (currently 931 persons), which approaches the 1,000-person Safe Harbor threshold and may trigger additional translation obligations in future ACS releases.
• Update this Language Assistance Plan as necessary, and at minimum with each Title VI Program update submitted to the Federal Transit Administration.
47 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix F: Demographic Data
/0/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11
/i255/13/14/15/16/17/18/i255/19/20/i255/21/15/15/19/15/i255/17/22/i255/14/23/i255/24/21/14/22/23 /25/26/i255/27/21/15/28/21/18/23/i255/19/20/i255/23/29/21/i255/23/19/23/14/24/i255/30/14/24/31/21/32 /33/14/34/21/i255/28/14/15/21/i255/35/17/23/29/i255/23/29/17/22/i255/22/23/14/23/17/22/23/17/28/32 /36/37/38/39
/40/41/42/43/44/45/i255/44/47/41
/i255/49/50/51/52/53/52/i255/54/50/55/56/57/58/50/57
/59/19/30/21/15/i255/20/19/15/i255/60/14/15/16/17/18/22/i255/19/20/i255/21/15/15/19/15/i255/14/18/61/i255/28/19/18/23/21/62/23/31/14/24/i255/61/14/23/14/32 /63/4/1
/64/65/66/67/68/69/i255/71/72/67/i255/73/74/66/68/65/75/76/i255/77/66/78/74/65/75/76/i255/77/72/73/79/68/75/76/i255/72/67/i255/80/74/72/75/75/66/67/79/65/75 /81/50/82/57/83/84 /85/3/11/1/86/9/87/87/1/88/i255/90/63
/91/92/93/94/95/i255/97/98/99/i255/100/101/102/103/104/105/i255/107/108/109/110/111/112/113/i255/107/114/115/i255/116/102/103/105/102/117/104/110/111/108/118/119/108/120/104/121/122/101/101/104/118/123/108/101/120/108/117/113/i255/107/114/i255/124/104/111/105/108/i255/114/105/104/102/115/i255/107/102/101/122/125/108/105/110/122/102/115 /126/110/122/111/104/127/i255/116/111/102/111/104/120
/128/129/130/131/132/133/133
/134/135/136/137/138/44/139/43/135/45
/36/36/38/128/i255/140/141/137/44/142/41/i255/143/43/138/41/140 /130/131/144/37/36/i255/136/41/135/136/138/41/i255/136/41/142/i255/140/141/137/44/142/41/i255/143/43/138/41 /90/1/145/11/146/11/i255/147/6/148/6/149/150/151/152/i255/153/154/153/155/i255/156/157/158/95/93/159/i255/160/98/92/95/161/161/i255/98/162/163/95/164 /165/9/145/147/i255/147/6/148/6/i255/166/3/5/i255/148/8/9/11/i255/7/87/6/10/1 /64/65/66/67/68/69/i255/78/167/i255/77/66/78/74/65/i255/72/67/i255/68/72/74/168/169/170/i255/170/66/169/65/171/171/171 /172 /173/3/7/146/87/6/148/9/3/145/i255/174/175/i255/6/4/1/i255/5/6/145/4/1 /176/177/178/179 /176/177/178/179
/176/176/178/179 /176/177/178/179
/176/180/178
/176/177/178/179
/176/176/178/179
/181/178/179
/182/178/179
/173/3/7/146/87/6/148/9/3/145/i255/174/175/i255/6/4/1/i255/10/6/148/1/4/3/5/175 /i255
/0/i255/2/3/4/4/2/5/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14/i255/15/16/17/18/14/i255/19/13 /10/11/14/i255/20/12/21/18/12/22/14/13/10/23/24/25/23/26/14/27/19/28/28/14/24 /29/23/28/26/23/22/30/i255/31/32/i255/33/14/10/18/23/i255/32/18/14/12/34/i255/35/36/37/38 /0/i255/2/3/4/4/2/5/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14/i255/15/16/17/18/14/i255/19/13 /31/12/28/19/39/23/18/13/19/12/34/i255/35/36/37/40
/i255/42/43/44/45/46/47/i255/48/49/i255/50/44/44/48/44/i255/46/51/i255/43/52/i255/53/50/43/51/52 /54/55/i255/56/50/44/57/50/47/52/i255/48/49/i255/52/58/50/i255/52/48/52/43/53/i255/59/43/53/60/50/61 /62/43/63/50/i255/57/43/44/50/i255/64/46/52/58/i255/52/58/46/51/i255/51/52/43/52/46/51/52/46/57/61 /65/66/67/68 /69/70/66/i255/72/i255/73/74/75/76/77/70/77/74/78 /73/70/79/76/79/80/77/70/81
/i255/42/43/44/45/46/47/i255/48/49/i255/50/44/44/48/44/i255/46/51/i255/43/52/i255/53/50/43/51/52 /54/55/i255/56/50/44/57/50/47/52/i255/48/49/i255/52/58/50/i255/52/48/52/43/53/i255/59/43/53/60/50/61 /62/43/63/50/i255/57/43/44/50/i255/64/46/52/58/i255/52/58/46/51/i255/51/52/43/52/46/51/52/46/57/61 /82/83/84/85/86/84/87
/88/89/90/i255/92/93/94/95/96/93/i255/95/97/92/98/99/89 /0/100/101/102/4/i255/103/104/i255/105/5/8/106/5/107/4/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14 /12/22/23/17/13/10/i255/19/13/i255/10/11/14/i255/20/12/21/18/12/22/14/13/10/23/24 /25/23/26/14/27/19/28/28/14/24/29/23/28/26/23/22/30/i255/31/32/i255/33/14/10/18/23 /32/18/14/12/34/i255/108/40/109/30/110/35/38
/0/i255/2/3/4/4/2/5/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14/i255/12/22/23/17/13/10/i255/19/13 /31/12/28/19/39/23/18/13/19/12/34/i255/108/40/38/30/38/35/40 /82/111/111/112/85/113/84/113
/114/89/115/95/93/97/i255/116/98/117/118/89/116/98/119/115 /95/97/92/98/99/89
/0/100/101/102/4/i255/120/104/i255/105/5/8/106/5/107/4/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14 /12/22/23/17/13/10/i255/19/13/i255/10/11/14/i255/20/12/21/18/12/22/14/13/10/23/24 /25/23/26/14/27/19/28/28/14/24/29/23/28/26/23/22/30/i255/31/32/i255/33/14/10/18/23 /32/18/14/12/34/i255/108/38/36/30/109/109/110
/0/100/101/102/4/i255/120/104/i255/105/5/8/106/5/107/4/i255/6/3/7/6/5/8/i255/10/11/12/13/i255/10/11/14 /12/22/23/17/13/10/i255/19/13/i255/31/12/28/19/39/23/18/13/19/12/34/i255/108/121/122/122/30/121/40/38 /123/76/70/79/80/66
/124/125/126/127/i255/129/130/131/130/132/133/134/135/136/129 /87/137/138 /111/87/137/111/138 /84/87/137/84/138 /113/87/137/113/138 /139/87/137/139/138 /83/87/137/83/138 /112/87/137/112/138 /86/87/137/86/138 /140/141
/142/87/143
/124/125/126/127/i255/129/130/131/130/132/133/134/135/136/129 /121/36/i255/10/23/i255/144/40
/145/146/147
/148/13/149/14/18/i255/121/36
/121/36/i255/10/23/i255/144/40
/144/110/i255/12/13/149/i255/23/27/14/18
/150
/124/125/126/127/i255/129/130/131/130/132/133/134/135/136/129 /29/14/22/12/28/14
/151/152/147
/33/12/28/14
/29/14/22/12/28/14
/153/i255/154/19/26/155/12/13/19/21/i255/19/13/21/28/17/149/14/26/i255/18/14/26/155/23/13/149/14/13/10/26/i255/23/39/i255/12/13/156/i255/18/12/21/14/37/i255/157/10/11/14/18/i255/21/12/10/14/16/23/18/19/14/26/i255/12/18/14/i255/13/23/13/24/154/19/26/155/12/13/19/21/37 /124/125/126/127/i255/129/130/131/130/132/133/134/135/136/129 /158/159/141
/160/161/162/163/164
/165/141/166
/167/168/169/170/171
/172/141/166
/173/169/163/162/174/164
/165/140/141/166
/175/176/162/169/177
/172/141/166
/178/176/168/169/177/179/164/180
/165/141/166
/181/163/161/164/180
/182/141/166
/183/184/185/143
/165/186/141/166
/187/162/176/188/169/177/162/170
/150
/124/125/126/127/i255/129/130/131/130/132/133/134/135/136/129 /189/79/190/81/66/75/79/191/192/i255/77/76/70/79/80/66
/165/182/141/166
/193/177/179/164/180/i255/82/83/87/195
/196/197/141/166
/82/83/87/195/i255/137/i255/82/111/87/87/195
/198/140/141
/82/111/87/87/195/i255/137/i255/82/84/87/87/195
/196/172/141/166
/181/174/164/180/i255/82/84/87/87/195
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /24/25/26/27
/28/29/30/31/32/33/31/i255/35/29/36/32/37/i255/38/32/39/29/30/40/41/i255/36/42/33/29 /43/44/45/46/47/i255/47/49/50/51/51/52/53/54/47/49/55/i255/57/58/i255/59/60/61/i255/62/63/59/61/i255/64/65/i255/59/60/61 /66/63/67/62/63/68/61/65/59/57/69/70/57/71/61/72/64/73/73/61/69/74/57/73/71/57/68/75/i255/76/77/i255/78/61/59/62/57 /77/62/61/63/79/i255/80/80/81/82/83
/43/44/45/46/47/i255/49/43/84/54/i255/59/60/61/i255/62/63/59/61/i255/64/65/i255/76/63/73/64/58/57/62/65/64/63/79/i255/80/80/81/85/83 /i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /86/87/25/26/i255/89/90/91/92/93/94/95
/96/29/97/33/i255/40/30/97/39/29/36/i255/40/42/98/29/i255/40/32/i255/37/32/30/99 /100/i255/101/102/103/i255/104/105/104/106/i255/107/108/41/29/97/30/i255/109/97/40/97 /43/44/45/46/47/i255/47/49/51/i255/55/43/110/51/i255/43/55/i255/59/60/61/i255/111/112/113/62/61/i255/64/65/i255/59/60/61 /66/63/67/62/63/68/61/65/59/57/69/70/57/71/61/72/64/73/73/61/69/74/57/73/71/57/68/75/i255/76/77/i255/78/61/59/62/57 /77/62/61/63/79/i255/114/115/81/80
/43/i255/84/116/47/47/84/51/i255/84/51/55/55/i255/59/60/63/65/i255/59/60/61/i255/111/112/113/62/61/i255/64/65/i255/76/63/73/64/58/57/62/65/64/63/79/i255/114/85/81/115 /117/118/119/120/121/120/122/123
/24/124/125/126/24/127
/128/129/98/35/29/30/i255/32/130/i255/131/32/129/31/29/131/32/36/109/31 /47/49/51/i255/132/43/133/50/43/110/51/134/47/45/52/135/45/55/51/136/116/84/84/51/52/137/45/84/55/45/110/138/i255/139/140 /141/51/47/50/45/i255/140/50/51/43/79/i255/142/143/143/75/114/80/85 /139/43/84/116/54/45/50/134/116/43/79/i255/80/82/75/115/142/115/75/144/82/85 /86/25/87
/28/29/30/31/32/33/31/i255/38/29/30/i255/131/32/129/31/29/131/32/36/109 /43/44/45/46/47/i255/47/49/51/i255/55/43/110/51/i255/43/55/i255/59/60/61/i255/111/112/113/62/61/i255/64/65/i255/59/60/61 /66/63/67/62/63/68/61/65/59/57/69/70/57/71/61/72/64/73/73/61/69/74/57/73/71/57/68/75/i255/76/77/i255/78/61/59/62/57 /77/62/61/63/79/i255/114/81/115
/43/i255/84/116/47/47/84/51/i255/84/51/55/55/i255/59/60/63/65/i255/59/60/61/i255/111/112/113/62/61/i255/64/65/i255/76/63/73/64/58/57/62/65/64/63/79/i255/114/81/85 /145/146/147/122/148/149/150
/151/148/118/152/123/153/146/148/149/118/149/120/146/152/i255/149/146/i255/155/146/148/156 /157/146/158/123/122/159/146/121/160/123
/161
/162/163/164/165/i255/167/168/169/168/170/171/172/173/174/167 /175/159/120/121/160/148/122/152/i255/176/177/152/160/122/148/i255/178/179/180 /181/57/72/61/62/59/182
/183/184/185
/181/57/72/61/62/59/182
/186/57/65/69/187/57/72/61/62/59/182
/162/163/164/165/i255/167/168/169/168/170/171/172/173/174/167 /188/122/152/120/146/148/123/i255/176/183/189/i255/118/152/160/i255/146/147/122/148/180 /181/57/72/61/62/59/182
/190/184/185
/181/57/72/61/62/59/182
/186/57/65/69/187/57/72/61/62/59/182
/161
/191/i255/192/65/64/72/61/62/71/61/79/i255/193/57/62/194/61/62/71/i255/80/144/i255/182/61/63/62/71/i255/63/65/195/i255/57/72/61/62 /162/163/164/165/i255/167/168/169/168/170/171/172/173/174/167 /196/122/118/152/123/i255/146/197/i255/149/148/118/152/123/153/146/148/149/118/149/120/146/152/i255/149/146/i255/155/146/148/156 /198/199/200
/201/202/203/204/94/i255/205/206/203/91/94
/198/200/207
/208/205/202/209/203/203/206/94/210
/211/200/207
/212/92/213/206/90/214/i255/93/202/205/91/95/90/93
/105/200/207
/215/90/214/216/214/206/94
/211/200/207
/217/205/206/218/94/210
/211/200/207
/219/93/220/94/202
/104/106/200
/217/203/202/218/94/210/i255/205/93/i255/220/203/89
/145/146/153/158/121/118/149/120/146/152/i255/221/150/i255/159/146/158/123/122/159/146/121/160/i255/149/150/153/122
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /24/25
/26/27/28/29/30/i255/32/33/34/33/35/i255/36/37/27/i255/38/39/40/29/i255/41/42/43/44/37 /45/46/43/42/30/38/i255/47/39/48/44/i255/49/29/39/43
/50/51/52/53/54/i255/56/57/58/i255/54/59/60/61/62/i255/64/65/66/i255/67/68/64/66/i255/69/70/i255/64/65/66/i255/71/68/72/67/68/73/66/70/64/74/75 /76/74/77/66/78/69/79/79/66/75/80/74/79/77/74/73/81/i255/82/83/i255/84/66/64/67/74/i255/83/67/66/68/85/i255/86/87/88/89/i255 /50/51/52/53/54/i255/56/57/90/i255/54/59/60/61/62/i255/64/65/66/i255/67/68/64/66/i255/69/70/i255/82/68/79/69/91/74/67/70/69/68/85/i255/86/87/92/89 /93/94/95/96/97/94/98/i255/100/97/94/97/101/100
/102/103/95/97/96/98/96/97/104
/105/106/107/108/i255/110/111/112/111/113/114/115/116/117/110 /84/68/67/67/69/66/118/i255/72/74/119/120/79/66/77
/121/122/123
/84/68/67/67/69/66/118/i255/72/74/119/120/79/66/77
/84/68/79/66/i255/65/74/119/77/66/65/74/79/118/66/67
/80/66/73/68/79/66
/65/74/119/77/66/65/74/79/118/66/67
/124/74/70/75/91/68/73/69/79/125
/126
/127/i255/128/70/69/78/66/67/77/66/85/i255/129/74/120/119/79/68/64/69/74/70/i255/130/92/i255/125/66/68/67/77/i255/68/70/118/i255/74/78/66/67 /105/106/107/108/i255/110/111/112/111/113/114/115/116/117/110 /84/68/67/67/69/66/118
/131/121/123
/84/68/67/67/69/66/118
/71/69/70/132/79/66
/105/106/107/108/i255/110/111/112/111/113/114/115/116/117/110 /93/94/95/96/97/94/98/i255/100/97/94/97/101/100/133/i255/134/104/i255/100/103/135 /136/103/137/103/95/i255/138/94/95/95/96/103/139
/140/39/141/29
/142/143/144/145
/146/29/28/39/141/29
/142/147/144/145
/136/148/149/i255/138/94/95/95/96/103/139
/140/39/141/29
/150/32/144
/146/29/28/39/141/29
/33/147/144
/151/96/137/148/95/152/103/139
/140/39/141/29
/32/35/144/145
/146/29/28/39/141/29
/32/153/144/145
/154/96/139/148/149/103/139
/140/39/141/29
/32/144/145
/146/29/28/39/141/29
/143/144/145
/126
/155
/127/i255/128/70/69/78/66/67/77/66/85/i255/156/74/73/66/70/i255/130/92/i255/64/74/i255/92/157/i255/125/66/68/67/77 /105/106/107/108/i255/110/111/112/111/113/114/115/116/117/110 /154/148/138/103/158/i255/149/159/148/i255/160/94/137/103/i255/134/96/95/97/159/i255/139/101/95/96/158/160/i255/161/94/100/97/i255/104/103/94/95/133/i255/134/104/i255/94/160/103/i255/160/95/148/101/161 /35/144
/162/163/164/162/165
/35/144
/166/167/164/166/168
/32/147/144/145
/166/163/164/166/165
/142/142/144/145
/169/167/164/169/163
/33/144/145
/169/163/164/169/165
/32/144/145
/168/167/164/168/168
/142/144/145
/168/163/164/163/167
/0/1/2/3/4/5/6
/7/8/9/10/11/12
/13/14/15/16/17/18/i255/20/21/i255/22/20/14/23/24/25/26/i255/14/25/24/27/23 /28/29/30/i255/32/33/34/35/33/36/30/37/28/38/39/40/38/41/30/42/43/44/44/30/39/45/38/44/41/38/36/46/i255/47/48 /49/30/28/35/38/i255/48/35/30/33/50/i255/52/53/54/55/56/57/58 /47/33/44/43/59/38/35/37/43/33/50/i255/60/61/55/62/53/53/55/58/60/53 /i255/64/65/66/67/68/69/i255/70/71/i255/72/66/66/70/66/i255/68/73/i255/65/74/i255/75/72/65/73/74 /76/77/i255/78/72/66/79/72/69/74/i255/70/71/i255/74/80/72/i255/74/70/74/65/75/i255/81/65/75/82/72/83 /84/65/85/72/i255/79/65/66/72/i255/86/68/74/80/i255/74/80/68/73/i255/73/74/65/74/68/73/74/68/79/83 /87/7/7/88/9/7/89/89
/90/17/91/24/92/25/i255/93/92/94/14/17/i255/20/21/i255/20/95/25/17/18/96/20/97/97/14/98/24/17/91 /22/20/14/23/24/25/26/i255/14/25/24/27/23
/33/99/38/100/28/i255/101/102/i255/103/30/35/34/30/37/28/i255/29/43/104/29/30/35/i255/105/106/107/108/i255/105/106/109/i255/107/110/111/112/108/105/i255/113/108 /105/106/109/i255/114/107/115/116/107/110/109/108/105/111/117/118/111/119/109/120/113/121/121/109/117/122/111/121/119/111/110/55/i255/123/124/i255/125/109/105/116/111 /124/116/109/107/50/i255/126/56/58/57/55/57/58/58
/33/99/38/100/28/i255/127/102/i255/103/30/35/34/30/37/28/i255/111/128/i255/105/106/109/i255/107/110/111/112/108/105/i255/113/108 /123/107/121/113/128/111/116/108/113/107/50/i255/126/53/57/52/55/57/58/58 /129/5/4/130/3/i255/132/i255/133/134/134/2/135/136/5/134/137 /138/136/139/2/140
/141/140/1/6/142/136/135/143/4/134/136/139/i255/144/1/145/4/139/4/130/137 /146/147/148/149/i255/151/152/153/152/154/155/156/157/158/151 /133/134/134/2/135/4/140/159/i255/160/3/161/i255/138/136/134/136/5/130 /162/115/115/112/163/113/109/164
/165/166/167
/162/115/115/112/163/113/109/164
/168/107/115/107/108/105
/146/147/148/149/i255/151/152/153/152/154/155/156/157/158/151 /133/169/5/140/142/3/143/4/135/i255/1/170/i255/1/134/134/2/135/4/140/159/i255/2/5/4/130/3 /162/171/108/109/116/i255/111/115/115/112/163/113/109/164 /172/173/167
/162/171/108/109/116/i255/111/115/115/112/163/113/109/164 /118/109/108/105/109/116/i255/111/115/115/112/163/113/109/164 /146/147/148/149/i255/151/152/153/152/154/155/156/157/158/151 /174/137/135/140/3/i255/1/170/i255/3/130/142/2/134/130/2/142/140 /114/113/108/175/121/109/i255/112/108/113/105
/176/173/167
/114/113/108/175/121/109/i255/112/108/113/105
/125/112/121/105/113/117/112/108/113/105
/125/111/177/113/121/109/i255/106/111/110/109
/178/111/107/105/55/i255/118/168/55/i255/120/107/108/55/i255/109/105/115/179 /146/147/148/149/i255/151/152/153/152/154/155/156/157/158/151 /180/140/136/142/i255/144/1/160/140/159/i255/4/5/181/i255/145/137/i255/135/140/142/134/140/5/130/136/6/140/i255/1/170/i255/135/1/135/2/139/136/130/4/1/5 /182/183/184
/185/186/187/188/189/186/i255/11/12/12/89
/191/183/184
/11/12/12/89/192
/193/182/183/184
/194/89/89/89/192
/182/195/183/184
/194/89/11/89/196/194/89/11/197
/198/199/183/184
/194/89/11/88/196/194/89/194/89
/193/200/183/184
/201/202/203/204/186/i255/194/89/194/11
/205
/206/i255/124/123/114/i255/207/58/207/61/i255/57/117/208/109/107/116/i255/164/107/105/107 /146/147/148/149/i255/151/152/153/152/154/155/156/157/158/151 /138/136/139/2/140/i255/1/170/i255/1/169/5/140/142/209/1/134/134/2/135/4/140/159/i255/143/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/2/5/4/130/3 /198/183/184
/210/203/211/186/189/i255/87/11/89/89/212
/193/183/184
/87/11/89/89/212/i255/196/i255/87/194/89/89/212
/193/183/184
/87/194/89/89/212/i255/196/i255/87/8/89/89/212
/182/183/184
/87/8/89/89/212/i255/196/i255/87/10/89/89/212
/193/193/183/184
/87/10/89/89/212/i255/196/i255/87/213/89/89/212
/199/214/183
/87/213/89/89/212/i255/196/i255/87/11/215
/200/183/184
/216/217/186/189/i255/87/11/215
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /24/25/26/27/28
/29/30/31/32/33/i255/35/36/37/38/32/i255/39/40/32/31/36/30/41/35/i255/42/32/43/40 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/50/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/58/59/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/60/61/62 /67/64/68/63/64/69/62/66/60/58/70/71/58/72/62/73/65/74/74/62/70/75/58/74/72/58/69/76/i255/77/78/i255/79/62/60/63/58 /78/63/62/64/80/i255/81/81/82/83/84
/44/45/46/47/48/i255/48/85/53/i255/86/44/87/53/i255/44/86/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/77/64/74/65/59/58/63/66/65/64/80 /81/88/82/89/84
/90/91/92/93/94/95
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /96/97/26/27/28
/98/36/99/100/i255/35/38/100/30/30/101/i255/99/40/43/33/i255/30/40 /100/36/99/100/32/40
/44/i255/102/103/48/48/102/53/i255/85/103/104/85/53/54/i255/60/61/64/66/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/60/61/62 /67/64/68/63/64/69/62/66/60/58/70/71/58/72/62/73/65/74/74/62/70/75/58/74/72/58/69/76 /77/78/i255/79/62/60/63/58/i255/78/63/62/64/80/i255/83/88/82/105/84 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/106/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/85/103/104/85/53/54/i255/60/61/64/66/i255/60/61/62 /63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/77/64/74/65/59/58/63/66/65/64/80/i255/107/89/82/83/84 /97/108/26/108/28
/109/43/38/100/32/101/30/40/110/35/i255/33/32/99/40/32/32/i255/30/40 /100/36/99/100/32/40
/44/45/46/47/48/i255/106/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/85/103/104/85/53/54/i255/60/61/64/66/i255/60/61/62 /63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/60/61/62/i255/67/64/68/63/64/69/62/66/60/58/70/71/58/72/62/73/65/74/74/62/70 /75/58/74/72/58/69/76/i255/77/78/i255/79/62/60/63/58/i255/78/63/62/64/80/i255/111/107/82/111/84 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/106/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/85/103/104/85/53/54/i255/60/61/64/66/i255/60/61/62 /63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/77/64/74/65/59/58/63/66/65/64/80/i255/111/107/82/81/84 /112/113/114
/115/32/40/35/30/37/35/i255/116/36/117/100/i255/101/43/37/99/41/43/99/32/i255/30/117/100/32/40/i255/117/100/43/37 /118/37/99/101/36/35/100/i255/35/39/30/119/32/37/i255/43/117/i255/100/30/120/32 /121/7/i255/122/2/11/2/i255/2/18/2/5/12/2/123/12/9
/124/94/125/126/127/94/126/128/i255/94/130/i255/131/91/132/128/133/i255/92/131/93/95/134/135/128/125/i255/136/137/138/139 /121/7/i255/122/2/11/2/i255/2/18/2/5/12/2/123/12/9
/124/94/125/126/127/94/126/128/i255/94/130/i255/131/91/132/128/133/i255/94/134/127/95/130/140/i255/138/141/142 /143/134/127/92/94/130/93/91/125/94/95/i255/94/130/130/94/93/125/132/128/125/130 /124/94/125/126/127/94/126/128
/144/95/94/92/128/i255/91/145/i255/146/93/135/130/131
/147
/148/149/150/151/i255/153/154/155/154/156/157/158/159/160/153 /144/91/161/127/95/94/130/93/91/125/i255/132/93/126/135/94/130/93/91/125/i255/140/93/125/92/128/i255/161/135/128/162/93/91/127/140/i255/163/128/94/135 /164/165/166
/167/168/169/170/i255/172/173/174/175/170/i255/176/170/168/177/i255/168/178/173 /179/166/180
/181/177/173/169/i255/175/168/169/170/i255/182/173/174/183/184/176 /185/166/180
/181/177/173/169/i255/186/187/188/188/170/177/170/183/184/i255/182/173/174/183/184/176 /189/166/180
/181/177/173/169/i255/186/187/188/188/170/177/170/183/184/i255/175/184/168/184/170 /189/166/180
/181/177/173/169/i255/168/190/177/173/168/186
/147
/191/i255/192/66/65/73/62/63/72/62/80/i255/193/58/194/195/74/64/60/65/58/66/i255/105/196/i255/197/62/64/63/72/i255/64/66/198/i255/58/73/62/63 /148/149/150/151/i255/153/154/155/154/156/157/158/159/160/153 /144/91/161/127/95/94/130/93/91/125/i255/146/163/i255/131/93/126/131/128/140/130/i255/95/128/162/128/95/i255/91/145/i255/128/134/127/92/94/130/93/91/125 /199/166/180
/112/173/i255/186/170/178/177/170/170
/189/200/166/180
/201/187/178/172/i255/175/182/172/173/173/202
/203/185/166
/167/173/169/170/i255/182/173/202/202/170/178/170
/204/164/166
/205/168/182/172/170/202/173/177/206/175
/189/203/166/180
/207/173/175/184/208/178/177/168/186
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /24/25/26/27/28
/29/30/31/32/33/34/35/36/37/30/31/35/i255/39/30/39/40/41/42/43/33/30/35 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/50/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/58/59/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66 /60/61/62/i255/67/64/68/63/64/69/62/66/60/58/70/71/58/72/62/73/65/74/74/62/70 /75/58/74/72/58/69/76/i255/77/78/i255/79/62/60/63/58/i255/78/63/62/64/80/i255/81/82/83/84/85 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/48/86/46/87/48/88/89/54/90/91/i255/58/59/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66 /77/64/74/65/59/58/63/66/65/64/80/i255/81/92/83/92/85
/i255/1/2/3/4/5/6/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/5/10/i255/2/11/i255/12/9/2/10/11 /13/14/i255/15/9/3/16/9/6/11/i255/7/8/i255/11/17/9/i255/11/7/11/2/12/i255/18/2/12/19/9/20 /21/2/22/9/i255/16/2/3/9/i255/23/5/11/17/i255/11/17/5/10/i255/10/11/2/11/5/10/11/5/16/20 /93/26/27/28
/94/30/39/40/41/42/43/33/30/35/i255/95/33/43/96/i255/97/32/43/32/31/42/35 /98/43/42/43/40/98
/44/45/46/47/48/i255/99/51/i255/52/53/54/55/53/56/48/i255/88/89/100/88/53/54/i255/60/61/64/66/i255/60/61/62 /63/64/60/62/i255/65/66/i255/60/61/62/i255/67/64/68/63/64/69/62/66/60/58/70/71/58/72/62/73/65/74/74/62/70 /75/58/74/72/58/69/76/i255/77/78/i255/79/62/60/63/58/i255/78/63/62/64/80/i255/101/83/101/85 /44/45/46/47/48/i255/99/102/103/i255/48/89/104/53/91/i255/60/61/62/i255/63/64/60/62/i255/65/66 /77/64/74/65/59/58/63/66/65/64/80/i255/105/85
/106/107/108/109/27/i255/111/30/43/42/41/i255/97/32/43/32/31/42/35/98 /106/107/112/25/112/i255/113/42/41/32
/112/27/108/i255/29/32/114/42/41/32
/115/i255/116/117/118/119/120/i255/118/122/123/124/125/i255/125/126/117/i255/127/117/120/128/124/128 /129/i255/127/117/120/128/124/128/i255/125/117/119/130/128/i255/131/i255/132/117/133/120/134/125/134/123/120/128 /135/i255/136/117/137/138/i255/131/i255/139/117/117/132/122/118/140/141 /142/143/144/143/145/146/147/i255/149/144/146/144/150/149 /151/7/18/9/3/i255/8/7/3/i255/152/2/3/4/5/6/10/i255/7/8/i255/9/3/3/7/3/i255/2/6/153/i255/16/7/6/11/9/154/11/19/2/12/i255/153/2/11/2/20 /21/17/5/10/i255/15/3/7/155/12/9/i255/153/5/10/15/12/2/156/10/i255/153/2/11/2/i255/8/3/7/152/i255 /152/7
/3/9/i255/11/17/2/6/i255/7/6/9/i255/157/158/159/i255/3/9/12/9/2/10/9/20/i255/158/17/2/3/11/10/i255/6/7/11/i255/153/9/3/5/18/9/153/i255/8/3/7/152/i255 /157/158/159/i255/160/14/160/161/i255/13/162/156/9/2/3/i255/153/2/11/2/i255/2/3/9/i255/6/7/11/9/153/i255/23/5 /11/17/i255/2/6/i255/163/20
/i255/164/20/159/20/i255/158/9/6/10/19/10/i255/165/19/3/9/2/19/i255/166/160/14/160/161/167/20/i255/157/152/9 /3/5/16/2/6/i255/158/7/152/152/19
/6/5/11/156/i255/159/19/3/18/9/156/i255/13/162/156/9/2/3/i255/9/10/11/5/152/2 /11/9/10/20/i255/168/9/11/3/5/9/18/9/153/i255/8/3/7/152/i255 /158/9/6/10/19/10/i255/168/9/15/7/3/11/9/3/i255/169/3/7/155/12/9/i255/15/2/4/9/i255/8/7/3/i255/168/7/10/9/18/5/12/12/9/170/i255/158/157 /171/17/11/11/15/172/173/173/16/9/6/10/19/10/3/9/15/7/3/11/9/3/20/7/3/4/173/15/3/7/155/12/9/10/173/13/174/14/14/14/164/159/14/174/174/160/175/176/177/162/3/7/10/9/18/5/12/12/9/162/16/2/173/178 /i255/164/20/159/20/i255/158/9/6/10/19/10/i255/165/19/3/9/2/19/i255/166/160/14/160/161/167/20/i255/157/152/9 /3/5/16/2/6/i255/158/7/152/152/19
/6/5/11/156/i255/159/19/3/18/9/156/i255/179/162/156/9/2/3/i255/9/10/11/5/152/2 /11/9/10/20/i255/168/9/11/3/5/9/18/9/153/i255/8/3/7/152/i255 /158/9/6/10/19/10/i255/168/9/15/7/3/11/9/3/i255/169/3/7/155/12/9/i255/15/2/4/9/i255/8/7/3/i255/168/7/10/9/18/5/12/12/9/170/i255/158/157 /171/17/11/11/15/172/173/173/16/9/6/10/19/10/3/9/15/7/3/11/9/3/20/7/3/4/173/15/3/7/155/12/9/10/173/13/174/14/14/14/164/159/14/174/174/160/175/176/177/162/3/7/10/9/18/5/12/12/9/162/16/2/173/178 /180
/181/i255/78/77/67/i255/81/82/81/105/i255/101/70/182/62/64/63/i255/183/64/60/64 /184/185/186/187/i255/189/190/191/190/192/193/194/195/196/189 /197/198/146/199/143/i255/200/201/i255/202/203/145/144/204/i255/201/200/145/i255/201/200/145/143/203/205/147/206/202/200/145/147/i255/207/200/207/150/198/146/144/203/200/147 /208/209/210/211
/212/213/214/215/216/217
/218/219/210
/220/221/222/223
/224/210/211
/220/225/214/222/226/223
/224/210/211
/227/226/217/223/228/222/223
/208/209/210/211
/229/223/230/222/228/i255/220/231/217/214/222/226/223
/232/210/211
/233/215/214/230/234/217/214/228/i255/220/231/217/214/222 /180
/181/i255/77/65/73/65/74/65/64/66/i255/73/62/60/62/63/64/66/72/i255/235/61/58/i255/72/62/63/73/62/183/i255/183/236/63/65/66/237/i255/235/64/63/60/65/69/62/i255/58/66/74/182/238/i255/78/77/67/i255/81/82/81/105/i255/101/70/182/62/64/63/i255/183/64/60/64 /184/185/186/187/i255/189/190/191/190/192/193/194/195/196/189 /142/143/144/143/145/146/147/149/i255/202/239/i255/240/146/145/144/203/241/143/i255/149/143/145/242/203/199/143 /224/232/243/211
/244/244/245/245
/218/246/246/211
/247/215/214/217/223
/224/248/243/243/232/211
/249/222/217/230/228/223/231
/224/248/250/219/251/211
/252/213/253/225/i255/254/24/108/108/255/221/0
/224/248/251/219/219/211
/252/213/253/225/i255/254/109/255/255/24/1/0
F
0 1 20.5 Miles
Individual Seniors / Sq. Mile
0 - 325
326 - 675
676 - 1050
1051 - 2000
2001 - 4000
City Limits
Roseville Transit Routes
Transfer Points
F
0 1 20.5 Miles
Disabled Persons / Sq. Mile
0 - 30
31 - 125
126 - 275
276 - 475
476 - 1000
City Limits
Roseville Transit Routes
Transfer Points
F
0 1 20.5 Miles
Low Income Households / Sq. Mile
0 - 100
101 - 300
301 - 550
551 - 1000
1001 - 1700
City Limits
Roseville Transit Routes
Transfer Points
F
0 1 20.5 Miles
Individual Youth / Sq. Mile
0 - 350
351 - 850
851 - 1500
1501 - 2500
2501 - 5200
City Limits
Roseville Transit Routes
Transfer Points
F
0 1 20.5 Miles
Zero Vehicle Households / Sq. Mile
0 - 40
41 - 130
131 - 225
226 - 550
551 - 1250
City Limits
Roseville Transit Routes
Transfer Points
55 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix G: Subrecipient Title VI Program – City of Lincoln Materials
56 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Subrecipient Title VI Program – City of Lincoln Materials
57 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix H: Public Involvement Plan
58 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Public Involvement Plan for the City of Roseville Program for Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Participation Plan, and Language Assistance Plan
Project Description: As a recipient of federal transportation funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the City of Roseville (COR) is required to develop a Program for implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including a Public Participation Plan (PPP) and a Language Assistance Plan (LAP). The Title VI Program documents the City of Roseville’s efforts to grant all citizens equal access to transit service, and also confirms that the City of Roseville is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of its services on the basis of race, color, or national origin. The PPP is intended to provide guidance for public involvement activities to be conducted by COR in the expenditure of FTA funds.
The PPP requires that all FTA-funded programs, plans or undertakings prepare a Public Involvement Plan that plans for and documents public outreach efforts. The LAP demonstrates that the City of Roseville, as a recipient of FTA funds, takes responsible steps to ensure meaningful access to the benefits, services, information, and other important portions of their programs and activities for individuals who are Limited English Proficient (LEP).
Public Involvement Plan Purpose: This PIP is being developed at the outset of the Title VI project to seek out the viewpoint of the general public as well as minority, low income, and LEP populations as it relates to the above-described project.
Public Involvement Strategies: The following public involvement strategies will be used to engage the public in the review of the above-described project:
• Transportation Commission Public hearing
• City Council Meeting
Public Notification: The following public notification methods will be used to engage the public in the review of the above-described project:
COR Website (translations available for multiple languages) Roseville Transit email and text message notifications Social media
Notice of Public Hearing
Post Meeting Agendas for Transportation Commission and City Council Post notices:
o Roseville Alternative Transportation Division office
o On-board bus kiosks
59 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Appendix I: Public Comments
60 City of Roseville Title VI Plan
Adopted: XXX, 2026
Public Comments Received during Public Review of the City of Roseville Program for Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Participation Plan, and Language Assistance Plan
On March 17, 2026, the Transportation Commission held a public hearing to r eceive comments regarding the updated Title VI Program and associated plans.
Comments:
1.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VII.17
File #: 0102-03
Item ID: 2026-244
Title: Minutes of Prior Meetings
Contact: Christine Mesaros 916-774-5287 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the March 18, 2026, City Council Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the minutes of the March 18, 2026, City Council Meeting.
BACKGROUND
Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City Council minutes are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Christine Mesaros, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
ATTACHMENTS:
1. March 18, 2026 City Council Meeting_Minutes_Preview
REVIEWERS:
Arleta Wagenhals, City Clerk Department Created/Initiated - 3/25/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/25/2026
Krista Bernasconi, Mayor
Karen Alvord, Vice Mayor
Bruce Houdesheldt, Councilmember
Tracy Mendonsa, Councilmember
Pauline Roccucci, Councilmember
Dominick Casey, City Manager
Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
MINUTES
City Council / Housing Authority Meeting
March 18, 2026
6:00 PM
Roseville Electric Building,
116 S. Grant Street, 1st Floor
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Bernasconi called the meeting to order at 6:01 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmemeber Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Fire Chief Ryan Harrigan led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IV. MEETING PROCEDURES
City Clerk Carmen Avalos announced the procedures for addressing the City Council.
V. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the first opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
No public comment received.
VI. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
1. Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project - Notice of Completion (PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Notice of Completion for the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project. The project included the widening of Pleasant Grove Boulevard into the median from Foothills Boulevard to Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard; resurfacing of the adjacent existing traffic lane with an overlay; and a water lateral from the future Environmental Utilities Well Site to the water main under Pleasant Grove. The project was completed by DeSilva Gates Construction. The final accounting of construction costs is ongoing and is currently estimated at approximately $10.1 million. This is within the approved project budget and no additional resources are required. The project was funded by Traffic Mitigation Fee funds, the Highway User Tax Fund, the Road Maintenance and Rehab Fund, Environmental Utilities funds, and the Electric Fund. No General Fund resources were used for the project.
CONTACT: Nick Bumb 916-746-1313 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-057 accepting the Public Work known as the Pleasant Grove Boulevard Widening Project, approving the "Notice of Completion", and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.
2. Westbrook Boulevard Signal Installation Project - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Call for Bids (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING - CITY PROJECTS) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications for the Westbrook Boulevard Signal Installation Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The scope of this project includes the signalization of five (5) intersections along Westbrook Boulevard. The traffic signals are located at the intersections of Solaire Drive, Earl Rush Drive, Nicole Gee Drive, Vista Grande Boulevard, and Sierra Garden Boulevard at Westbrook Boulevard. Construction is estimated to cost approximately $2,160,000 and is planned for summer to fall 2026. This project is funded through the Traffic Mitigation Fund. No General Fund resources will be used on this project.
CONTACT: Brian Gulewich 916-746-1376 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the plans and specifications for the Westbrook Boulevard Signal Installation Project and authorize staff to call for bids.
3. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transporation Development Act Claim Revision (PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT - TRANSPORTATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the revised Fiscal Year 2024-25 Transportation Development Act claim in the amount of $12,563,878 for the City’s transit and transportation funding. This claim revision will true-up the amounts claimed with the Transit and Transportation funding earned in FY2024-25. Included in this claim is a payment of $59,547 to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency for Roseville’s share of the Countywide Zero Emmission Vehicle Infrastructure Plan grant match.
CONTACT: Kimberly Goulet 916-746-1320 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-059 approving and authorizing execution of the 2024/25 Transportation Development Act claims revision to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency; and
b. Approve payment of FY2024-25 Local Transportation Fund funds to Placer County Transportation Planning Agency in the amount of $59,547 for the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency Countywide Zero Emmission Vehicle Infrastructure Plan grant match.
4. Fleet Truck and Equipment Purchases – Purchase Orders and Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a purchase order to Rush Medium-Duty Truck Centers of California, Inc. dba Rush Truck Center, Ceres for one (1) Ford F450 truck with a service body and liftgate utilizing Sourcewell contract # 032824-RTG in the amount of $133,057; and a purchase order to Holt of California Inc. for one (1) CAT Excavator 305 and attachments utilizing Sourcewell contract # 020223-CAT in the amount of $29,513. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment of $163,024 from available resources in the Wastewater Operations Fund for payment to the Fleet Replacement Fund. In addition to the existing $26,976 in the Fleet Replacement Fund, this adjustment establishes a budget of $150,000 to purchase the Ford F450 truck, service body and liftgate through the Fleet Replacement Fund. The additional $40,000 adjustment establishes a budget to fund the trade-in and replacement of a CAT Excavator 304 with a CAT Excavator 305 to meet the Wastewater utility's needs. The net impact of this purchase is a reduction of $26,976 in the Fleet Replacement Fund.
CONTACT: Loni Randolph, Tracie Mueller 916-746-1898, 916-774-5688 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve a purchase order to Rush Medium-Duty Truck Centers of California, Inc. dba Rush Truck Center;
b. Approve a purchase order to Holt of California Inc.; and
c. Adopt Ordinance No. 7050 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
5. Sewer Lift Station 19 Condition Assessment - Capital Improvement Project Approval and Budget Adjustment (ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - WASTEWATER) Summary: Staff recommends approval of the creation of a new Enhanced Compliance Action Capital Improvement Project called the Sewer Lift Station 19 Force Main Condition Assessment Project. Staff also recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $406,790 associated with the new project, which will be funded by the available resources in the Wastewater Rehabilitation Fund.
CONTACT: Tracie Mueller 916-774-5688 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Authorize the establishment of a new Capital Improvement Project, the Sewer Lift Station 19 Force Main Condition Assessment Project; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7051 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
6. 2025 Housing Element and General Plan Annual Progress Reports (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an informational report on the annual status of the Housing Element and General Plan implementation progress reports, as required by the State of California. The staff cost to develop the progress reports was included in the FY2025-26 adopted budget. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Trisha Isom, Lauren Hocker 916-746-1239, 916-774-5272 [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-056 approving the 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report and approving the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report.
7. HOUSING AUTHORITY/CITY COUNCIL - Quarterly Status Update 4th Quarter 2025 (ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING)
Summary: Staff recommends City Council, acting as the Roseville Housing Authority Board, receive a quarterly status report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program.
This report is for informational purposes only and has no impact on the City's General Fund.
CONTACT: Suzi Cook-Turner, Trisha Isom 916-774-5414, 916-746-1239 smcook- [email protected], [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Receive a quarterly status report on the Housing Authority’s Housing Choice Voucher Program.
8. FD-50 Park Project - Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Staff to Call for Bids (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - PARK DEVELOPMENT) Summary: Staff recommends approval of plans and specifications for the FD-50 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids. The project scope includes a playground, shaded picnic area, paved walking paths, multi-use grass turf area, plantings and irrigation. The project is estimated to cost $580,000 for the base bid, and will be funded by the Sierra Vista Neighborhood Park Fund.
CONTACT: Josh Cervantes 916-746-1233 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
A. Approve the plans and specifications for the FD-50 Park Project and authorize staff to call for bids.
9. Maidu Community Center Storage Project – New Capital Improvement Project and Budget Adjustment (PARKS, RECREATION, AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT - RECREATION) Summary: Staff recommends approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $110,000 for the establishment of a new capital project, Maidu Community Center Storage, for the design, permitting, and construction of new storage space at the Maidu Community Center. Funding is provided by the Parks and Recreation Fee Funded Projects Fund.
CONTACT: Rob Nakamura 916-774-5135 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approval of a New Capital Improvement Project; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7049 authorizing certain amendments to the fiscal year 2025-26 budget and declaring this ordinance to be immediately effective as an appropriation measure.
10. Email Security System - Contract Purchase Agreement Amendment (INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT - INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an amendment to the existing contract purchase agreement with Six Degrees Inc. dba Six Degrees Consulting to provide Check Point advanced email and collaboration security subscription and premium support. The contract amendment will increase the cost of the contract by $4,568.74, to a total of $79,506.08, to add Domain- based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance management functionality.
Funding is included in the Information Technology's FY2025-26 Operations Fund budget.
CONTACT: Cesar Gamez 916-774-5408 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-058 approving a contract purchase agreement amendment #1, by and between the City of Roseville and Six Degrees, Inc. dba Six Degrees Consulting, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
11. Firm and Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission, and for Resale, Reassignment or Transfer of Point-To-Point Transmission - Transmission Service Agreements (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT -
RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of three Transmission Service Agreements with Puget Sound Energy Inc. to maintain the electric utility's power transmission capacity. These agreements will continue to allow Roseville Electric to purchase physical capacity for the
transmission of electric power. There is no fiscal impact associated with the execution of the Transmission Service Agreements as they are enabling agreements.
CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-060 approving a service agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and Puget Sound Energy, Inc., and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
12. Main Gas Supplier - Agreement Confirmation (ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT - RESOURCE PLANNING & GENERATION)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of a three-year main gas supplier agreement with ConocoPhillips Company to provide natural gas balancing services to the City. The agreement supports the Electric Department's operation of its natural gas generating facilities by scheduling the daily natural gas deliveries for planned electricity production. The average annual total cost of the transactions under this agreement is estimated to be over $25 million. Funding is included in the Electric Department's FY2025-26 budget in the Electric Fund.
CONTACT: Petra Wallace 916-774-5510 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-061 approving a main gas supplier agreement confirmation, by and between the City of Roseville and ConocoPhillips Company, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.
13. Staffing Changes (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the Seasonal/Temporary salary schedule reflecting the retitling of a classification from Soccer Official to Soccer Official I, and the addition of a Soccer Official II and a Soccer Official III classification. Updates to the City allocation schedule reflect the addition of (1) regular full-time Senior Engineer and the deletion of (2) regular full-time Office Assistant I/II positions. These changes are being made as part of an ongoing assessment of the appropriate staffing levels to provide a high level of service to the community. For the remainder of FY2025-26, the financial impact of the recommendations to the General Fund is $8,768.
Beyond this fiscal year, the recommended changes have an annual ongoing impact of $32,568 to the General Fund.
CONTACT: Macy Dippert 916-774-5215 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7054 amending Ordinance No. 7033, the salary Ordinance for Seasonal/Temporary Employees, as amended by Appendix "B" to be effective March 21, 2026, as an urgency measure; and
b. Approve the city-wide allocation schedule effective March 21, 2026.
14. Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Ordinance - Military Equipment Policy (POLICE
DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance for second reading renewing Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”, thereby authorizing the Roseville Police Department’s continued use of “military equipment”, as defined by Government Code Section 7070.
CONTACT: Scott Blynn 916-774-5079 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7052 renewing City of Roseville Ordinance 6463 and readopting and continuing Roseville Police Department Policy No. 706, titled “Military Equipment”.
15. Second Reading - Roseville Municipal Code Updates - Electric General Service 5 Rate (ELECTRIC
DEPARTMENT - FINANCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of an ordinance for second reading amending sections
14.24.020 and 14.24.050 of Chapter 14.24 of the Roseville Municipal Code in regards to establishing a new General Service 5 rate class for Roseville Electric customers with recorded demand greater than 7,500 kW and a load factor of 85 percent or higher. The rate is designed to more accurately reflect the cost of service for extra-large customers with highly efficient usage patterns and maintain alignment with Roseville’s cost-based rate policy.
CONTACT: Kerri Crosby 916-746-1263 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Ordinance No. 7053 amending sections 14.24.020 and 14.24.050 of Chapter 14.24 of Title 14 of the Roseville Municipal Code regarding Electrical Energy.
16. Proclamation - Government Finance Professionals Week Summary: Proclaim March 23-27, 2026 as Government Finance Professionals Week and encourage all citizens to join the City of Roseville in recognizing the contribution and importance of our Government Finance Professionals and their impact within government.
CONTACT: Arleta Wagenhals 916-774-5200 [email protected]
17. Minutes of Prior Meetings (CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the March 4, 2026, Closed Session Meeting and March 4, 2026, City Council Meeting.
CONTACT: Christine Mesaros 916-774-5287 [email protected]
The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Approve the minutes of the March 4, 2026, Closed Session Meeting and March 4, 2026, City Council Meeting.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
VII. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
18. Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592 - Successor Memorandum of Understanding and Labor Market Adjustments (HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT)
Summary: Staff recommends the City Council approve a successor Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Roseville Firefighters (RFF), Local 1592, for a term beginning January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2029. The additional costs to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026 General Fund budget will be $351,100. These costs will be covered by appropriations included in the FY 2025-26 budget. The overall ongoing projected costs of salary and benefit increases to the General Fund over the MOU four-year term is $9,421,700. The total contract cost accounts for labor market adjustments in year 1 and a general wage increase of two and one-half percent in year 2 for the fire prevention team only. To address compaction and internal alignment, the contract costing includes rank separation adjustments in year 2 and 3 for the Fire Engineer and Fire Captain base wages, offset by a 5% reduction in certification pay for both job classes in year
2. In year 4, a general wage increase of 1.75% for the Firefighter Paramedic I/II and Firefighter EMT salary ranges and 3.0% general wage increase for the fire prevention team is included. The costing does not account for labor market adjustments to maintain salaries at the 55th percentile of the market in year 3, which will be presented to the City Council in December 2027.
CONTACT: Stacey Peterson 916-774-5374 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-062 approving a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for employees represented by Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
b. Adopt Ordinance No. 7055 amending Ordinance No. 6982, the Salary Ordinance for employees represented by Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592, as amended by Appendix “A”, to be effective March 21, 2026 as an urgency measure.
Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson made the presentation to the City Council.
Motion by Vice Mayor Alvord, seconded by Councilmember Roccucci. The motion passed.
Adopt Resolution No. 26-062 approving a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for employees represented by Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville; and
Adopt Ordinance No. 7055 amending Ordinance No.6982, the Salary Ordinance for employees represented by Roseville Firefighters, Local 1592, as amended by Appendix "A", to be effecective March 21, 2026 as an urgency measure. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
19. Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - HOUSING) Summary: Staff recommends approval and establishment of an Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fee for required affordable rental units and for affordable for-sale units. These fees will apply when a housing development opts not to construct the required affordable units on-site and instead contributes a fee per unit as an alternative. No General Fund resources will be used.
CONTACT: Kristine Faelz 916-774-5451 [email protected] The City Council will consider the recommendation to:
a. Adopt Resolution No. 26-055 adopting the Affordable Housing In Lieu Fees and incorporating the fees into the schedule of user and regulatory fees.
Motion by Councilmember Houdesheldt, seconded by Vice Mayor Alvord, to drop item 19 to be listed at a future council meeting and approve the remaining items as recommended. The motion passed.
Ayes: Vice Mayor Alvord, Councilmember Houdesheldt, Councilmember Mendonsa, Councilmember Roccucci, Mayor Bernasconi.
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the second opportunity to make a public comment on non-agenda items.
No public comment received.
IX. STAFF/COUNCIL REPORTS
City Manager Dominick Casey provided an update on the council chambers renovation.
Placer SPCA's Guardian Angel Gala - Councilmember Mendonsa reported on attendance.
Placer County Flood Control & Water Conservation Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported.
Regional Water Authority Meeting - Councilmember Roccucci reported.
Vice Mayor Alvord announced upcoming park openings and Union Pacific Locomotive 4014 (Big Boy) coming to the City in April.
Northern California Water Association Meeting - Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on attendance.
Western Placer Waste Management Authority - Councilmember Houdesheldt reported on attendance.
Greater Sacramento Economic Council Meeting - Mayor Bernasconi reported on attendance.
Mayor Bernasconi reported on various community events.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Krista Bernasconi adjourned the meeting at 6:28 p.m.
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VIII.18
File #: 0704
Item ID: 2026-159
Title: Park Naming Policy Revision
Contact: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of a revised Park Naming Policy. The Park Naming Policy revisions will have no fiscal impact on capital improvement budgets nor the General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the revised Park Naming Policy.
BACKGROUND
Consistent with the current park naming policy, in July 2025, park name submissions from the public were accepted for four new parks. At its November 2025 meeting, the Parks & Recreation Commission provided park name recommendations to be forwarded to the Council, and also expressed interest in future policy revisions. Concurrently, staff received interest from Council for policy revisions. It was decided to postpone the current naming process and revisit the policy. In December 2025, staff made a presentation to Council seeking their feedback for revisions. Based on feedback received from both the Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council, staff is proposing revisions to the current policy for Council’s consideration.
Proposed revisions include:
1) Minor edits and language clean-up.
2) A change in the makeup of the Park Naming Subcommittee to consist of three Park & Recreation Commissioners.
3) Clarifying "significant volunteer contribution" as a period of at least ten years, resulting in a public benefit and improved quality of life for Roseville residents.
4) Added the desire to maintain an overall balance of park names that are named after individuals and those that are named per the other criteria.
5) Added a section in the submission form to request information regarding the nominee's volunteer contributions.
The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed and supported the proposed policy revisions at its March 2, 2026, meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Park Naming Policy Revisions will have no fiscal impact on capital improvement budgets nor the General Fund.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a
project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The Park Naming Policy Revisions meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
5. Support community engagement and advocacy
6. Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Gee, Park Planning and Development Manager
Jill Geller, Parks Recreation and Libraries Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-067
2. Park Naming Policy
3. Park Naming Policy - redline version
REVIEWERS:
Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Created/Initiated - 2/19/2026 Tara Gee, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries Department - Park Development Approved - 2/19/2026 Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation, and Libraries - All Approved - 3/6/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/16/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/17/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/17/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/18/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-067
APPROVING REVISIONS TO THE PARK NAMING POLICY PROGRAM FOR
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, due to recent changes, staff recommends revisions to the Park Naming Policy; and
WHEREAS, those revisions were submitted to the Parks and Recreation Commission for review and recommendation on March 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission supports the proposed March 2026 revisions to the Park Naming Policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said March 2026 revisions to the Park Naming Policy are hereby adopted by the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
9.1.1 1
City of Roseville – Parks, Recreation & Libraries
Department Policies & Procedures
APPROVED: Number: 9.1.1
Effective Date: [date]
[date] ________________________ Approved by Council:
Revised Date: [date]
Jill Geller, Director Last Reviewed Date: [date]
Subject: Park Naming
Purpose
The City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) has established a policy that provides a process and parameters for the solicitation of names and the approval of recommended name suggestions for parks and PRL facilities. This process was approved by City Council on XX/XX/2026.
Policy
It is the policy of PRL to annually, as applicable, seek name suggestions from the community for new parks and PRL facilities.
Definition
“PRL facilities” are defined as recreation facilities, rooms within PRL buildings, and amenities within parks including, but not limited to, sports fields, groves of trees, walkways and trails.
There is a separate naming process for City buildings and other City facilities.
Process
In July of each year, notification is made to the public and interested individuals that name suggestions are being sought for new parks and facilities that will be under construction during that fiscal year period (July 1 to June 30). This suggestion period is open for the month of July. Names should be submitted to the City Clerk and forwarded to the Park Planning and Development Manager.
At the conclusion of the suggestion period, the names received will be considered as follows:
1) The Park Naming Subcommittee shall review the list and make recommendations for park and/or facility names, using the criteria outlined below, to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
2) The Park Naming Subcommittee shall consist of three members of the Parks & Recreation Commission, chosen by the Commission prior to July of each year. 3) Names received shall be considered “active” for both the current and following fiscal years, and will be considered for the parks and facilities scheduled for construction during those same fiscal years.
4) A name suggestion cannot be formally submitted more than three times (for a total of six “active” years).
5) The Park Naming Subcommittee and/or City Council has the right to select a name not included on the “active” list, under special circumstances.
9.1.1 2
Criteria for Naming a Park Facility
The act of naming is significant and meaningful. A name can invoke powerful emotions, create images and help to recall history. The naming of a park or facility is intended to be a permanent act, and therefore should be approached in a thoughtful manner. The name of a park or facility should take into consideration the past, present and future history of the land, its use, and our relationship to it. The following criteria and factors shall be considered when naming or renaming a park or facility:
• Recognition of nearby prominent geographical locations (e.g., street names, subdivision names, or adjacent school names)
• Recognition of significant or notable natural and geological features of the area • Recognition of outstanding features of the park or facility • Recognition of historical or cultural significance in the area
Park names may also recognize significant individuals (living or deceased) within the community, as follows:
• The person contributed a significant amount of land or funding for the park or facility, typically amounting to 50% or more of development costs. • The person has made significant volunteer contributions, for a period of at least ten years, that resulted in a public benefit and improved quality of life of Roseville residents. • The person died in the line of duty as part of City service.
It is the desire of the City to maintain an overall balance of park names among those that are named after individuals and those that are named per other criteria. In any given year the majority of park names may lean one way or the other but, cumulatively, a balance is desired. As of the date of this policy revision, the City’s 94 parks were named 60% after people and 40% per other criteria.
Dog Parks: The City has set a precedent of naming dog parks after dogs who have served as K-9 officers in the City of Roseville Police Department’s K-9 Unit. It is recommended that the selection of dog park names continue this tradition.
Naming of new parks or facilities should also consider:
• Including “Roseville” for regional or citywide parks and facilities • Avoiding duplication of names in order to ease confusion of sites and locations for the general public
It is noted that the City of Roseville is grateful for the sacrifices of our fallen soldiers and veterans who served our country. With limited parks and facilities available, it is difficult to place a higher value or honor of one life over another. Therefore, honoring our fallen soldiers and veterans shall be directed to existing veteran-related programs within the City.
Re-naming of an existing park or facility, due to costs, potential loss of neighborhood identity and other considerations, shall be discouraged. The City Council reserves the right to add to the name of an existing park not named after a person or family, due to special circumstances. In such cases, the original park name shall not be replaced. Under these special circumstances, community contributions towards the offset of costs incurred to change signage shall be considered in the approval process.
9.1.1 3
Name Selection Process
1) The Subcommittee shall review all names and recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
2) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration at a formal meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the City Council. 3) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the City Council for approval at a formal meeting. 4) Family members of any potential namesakes shall be contacted by PRL staff prior to final approval by City Council, to ensure their support of the recommendation. 5) The Annual Park Naming Process shall conclude upon City Council’s final approval of the park or facility name.
Document Reference
Fillable Submission Form
9.1.1 1
City of Roseville – Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department Policies & Procedures
APPROVED: Number: 9.1.1
Effective Date: 06/16/2021
Revised Date: 06/16/2021
Jill Geller, Director Last Reviewed Date: 11/19/2025
Subject: Park Naming
Purpose
The City of Roseville Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) has established a policy that provides a process and parameters for the solicitation of names and the approval of recommended name suggestions for parks and PRL facilities. This process was approved by City Council on 06/16/2021XX/XX/2026.
Policy
It is the policy of PRL to annually, as applicable, seek name suggestions from the community for new parks and PRL facilities.
Definition
“PRL facilities” are defined as recreation facilities, rooms within PRL buildings, and amenities within parks including, but not limited to, sports fields, groves of trees, walkways and trails.
There is a separate naming process for City buildings and other City facilities.
Process
In July of each year, notification is made to the public and interested individuals that name suggestions are being sought for new parks and facilities that will be under construction during that fiscal year period (July 1 to June 30). This suggestion period is open for the month of July. Names should be submitted to the City Clerk and forwarded to the Park Planning and Development Manager.
At the conclusion of the suggestion period, the names received will be considered as follows:
1) The Park Naming Subcommittee shall review the list and make recommendations for park and/or facility names, using the criteria outlined below, to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
1)2) The Park Naming Subcommittee shall consist of the following staff:three members of the Parks & Recreation Commission, chosen by the Commission prior to July of each year. a. PRL Director
b. Park Planning and Development Manager
c. Sr. Park Development Project Manager or Park Development Project Manager (one representative serving a two-year term, to be rotated) d. PRL Superintendent from the Parks Division (one representative serving a two- year term, to be rotated among PRL Superintendents from the Parks Division)
9.1.1 2
e. PRL staff member chosen “at-large”, who shall serve a two-year term f. Staff member from the Development Services Department (one representative serving a two-year term, to be rotated among Development Services staff) Two-year terms shall be staggered to provide continuity in the rotational representation. 2)3) Names received shall be considered “active” for both the current and following fiscal years, and will be considered for the parks and facilities scheduled for construction during those same fiscal years.
3)4) A name suggestion cannot be formally submitted more than three consecutive yearstimes (for a total of six “active” years).
4)5) The Park Naming Subcommittee and/or City Council hasmaintains the right to select a name not included on the “active” list, due tounder special circumstances such as historical significance, the passing of an active contributor(s) to the community, or other considerations.
Criteria for Naming a Park Facility
The act of naming is significant and meaningful. A name can invoke powerful emotions, create images and help to recall history. The naming of a park or facility is intended to be a permanent act, and therefore should be approached in a thoughtful manner. The name of a park or facility should take into consideration the past, present and future history of the land, its use, and our relationship to it. The following criteria and factors shall be considered when naming or renaming a park or facility:
• Recognition of nearby prominent geographical locations (e.g., street names, subdivision names, or adjacent school names)
• Recognition of significant or notable natural and geological features of the area • Recognition of outstanding features of the park or facility • Recognition of historical or cultural significance in the area
Park names may also Recognition ofrecognize significant individuals (living or deceased) within the community, as follows:
o The person contributed a significant amount of land or funding for the park or facility, typically amounting to 50% or more of development costs. o The person has made significant volunteer contributions, for a period of at least ten years, that resulted in a public benefit and improved quality of life of Roseville residents to the Roseville community and its residents’ quality of life. o The person is deceased and is being recognized for substantial volunteer contributions to the quality of life in Roseville.
o The person died in the line of duty as part of City service.
It is the desire of the City to maintain an overall balance of park names among those that are named after individuals and those that are named per other criteria. In any given year the majority of park names may lean one way or the other but, cumulatively, a balance is desired. As of the date of this policy revision, the City’s 94 parks were named 60% after people and 40% per other criteria.
Dog Parks: The City has set a precedent of naming dog parks after dogs who have served as K-9 officers in the City of Roseville Police Department’s K-9 Unit. It is recommended that the selection of dog park names continue this
9.1.1 3
tradition.
Naming of new parks or facilities should also consider:
• Including “Roseville” for regional or citywide parks and facilities • Avoiding duplication of names in order to ease confusion of sites and locations for the general public
The Subcommittee reserves the right to consider exceptions due to extraordinary circumstances, which inspire vision and civic engagement. Exceptions can be made when the actions or contributions of an individual not normally meeting the established criteria are so significant and profound that this person deserves consideration.
It is noted that the City of Roseville is grateful for the sacrifices of our fallen soldiers and veterans who served our country. With limited parks and facilities available, it is difficult to place a higher value or honor of one life over another. Therefore, honoring our fallen soldiers and veterans shall be directed to existing veteran-related programs within the City.
Re-naming of an existing park or facility, due to costs, potential loss of neighborhood identity and other considerations, shall be discouraged. The City Council reserves the right to add to the name of an existing park not named after a person or family, due to special circumstances. In such cases, the original park name shall not be replaced. Under these special circumstances, community contributions towards the offset of costs incurred to change signage shall be considered in the approval process.
Name Selection Process
1) The Subcommittee shall review all names and recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the Parks & Recreation Commission.
2) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration at a formal meeting. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall recommend up to three names for each new park or facility to the City Council.
3) The recommended names, along with the full list of submissions (including the “active” names from the previous year), shall be reviewed by the City Council for approval at a formal meeting. 4) Family members of any potential namesakes shall be contacted by PRL staff prior to final approval by City Council, to ensure their support of the recommendation. 5) The Annual Park Naming Process shall conclude upon City Council’s final approval of the park or facility name.
Document Reference
Fillable Submission Form
City Council
Communication
Meeting Date: 4/1/2026
Item #: VIII.19
File #: 0800-02
Item ID: 2026-185
Title: Water Forum Agreement 2050
Contact: George Hanson 916-746-1764 [email protected]
SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the City to participate in the Water Forum Agreement 2050 and authorize execution of the agreement; approve the City Purveyor Specific Agreement; and authorize execution of the Third Interagency Agreement for the Administration and Management of the Water Forum. Collectively, these actions formalize Roseville’s continued participation in the regional Water Forum framework through 2050, reaffirm the City’s commitments to water supply reliability and protection of the lower American River, and establish the governance and administrative structure for implementation. The associated costs are consistent with previously authorized Water Forum cost-sharing commitments and will continue to be funded through the Water Operations Fund as part of the annual Water Administration budget.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution to approve the Water Forum Agreement 2050, Memorandum of Understanding for Water Forum 2050, Purveyor Specific Agreement and Third Interagency Agreement for the Administration and Management of the Water Forum, and authorize the City Manager to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.
BACKGROUND
The Water Forum is a long-standing regional partnership that brings together water providers, environmental organizations, business interests, local governments, and community groups to resolve complex water management issues collaboratively. The Water Forum stakeholders are organized within four caucuses: environmental, water, business, and public. A list of the Water Forum members is attached.
Since the original Water Forum Agreement was signed in 2000, this approach has:
• Reduced conflict over water management decisions.
• Supported major infrastructure and water reliability investments. • Improved habitat and ecological conditions on the lower American River. • Improved scientific understanding of the American River system. • Created a trusted regional voice in state and federal water policy discussions. • Fostered a culture of trust and transparency among historically competing interests.
WHY AN UPDATED AGREEMENT IS NEEDED
The original agreement is nearing the end of its term, and conditions affecting water management have changed substantially since 2000. Climate change is the most significant new challenge, driving changes in snowpack and runoff that affect surface water reliability, hotter temperatures and increased stress on fish
and water quality, more frequent and severe droughts and floods, and increased competition and regulatory pressure on American River water supplies. WF2050 modernizes the original agreement while retaining its proven collaborative framework.
COEQUAL OBJECTIVES
WF2050 reaffirms the two coequal objectives that have guided the Water Forum for over 25 years:
1. Provide a reliable and safe water supply for the region’s economic health and planned development.
2. Preserve the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the lower American River.
The agreement is voluntary and implemented through mutual commitments rather than regulation.
WATER FORUM 2050 NEGOTIATION PROCESS
WF2050 was developed through a multi-year, consensus-based negotiation process involving representatives from the four caucuses. Participants devoted substantial time to technical analysis, facilitated discussions, and iterative drafting to ensure that the updated agreement reflects shared values, incorporates best available science, and remains implementable for diverse signatories. The process emphasized transparency, mutual respect, and voluntary commitments rather than regulatory mandates.
WATER FORUM FRAMEWORK AND KEY PROGRAM AREAS
Agreement Framework
WF2050 is organized into five key integrated program areas that work together to advance the coequal objectives and includes a cross-cutting initiative with the American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP).
Key Program Areas
1. American River Flows and Operations – Protects river flows and temperatures while maintaining water supply reliability, including implementation of a Flow Management Standard and advocacy for flexible reservoir operations.
2. American River Corridor Health – Builds on successful habitat efforts to restore and manage the lower American River corridor through adaptive management, partnerships, and leveraged funding.
3. Regional Water Supply Sustainability – Supports long-term reliability through conjunctive use of surface and groundwater, demand management, and coordinated actions during droughts.
4. Science, Monitoring, and Decision Support – Provides the technical foundation for adaptive management, transparency, and performance tracking.
5. Governance, Funding, and Administration – Establishes decision-making, cost-sharing, and administrative structures to support implementation over the 25-year term.
American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP)
ARCAP is a cross-cutting initiative and a cornerstone of WF2050. It focuses on identifying and managing regionally developed water—stored in wet years and used strategically during critically dry periods to:
• Improve regional water storage.
• Reduce river temperatures to protect fish and water supply. • Improve drought resilience.
• Safeguard future regional water supplies.
WATER FORUM BENEFITS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Approval of WF2050 is beneficial for the City in several ways:
• Continues participation in a trusted regional collaboration • Contributes to the ongoing protection of the lower American River. • Strengthens regional resilience to climate-driven water challenges. • Promotes improved science and data for the lower American River conditions and trends. • Improves coordination with neighboring agencies, regional interested parties, and regulators. • Does not supersede existing water rights or regulatory authority.
WF2050 positions the Sacramento region to proactively address climate change impacts on water supply and river health while continuing a 25-year legacy of collaboration, shared problem-solving, and regional stewardship. Approval allows the City to remain at the table shaping solutions that protect both water reliability and the lower American River. A copy of the WF2050 is attached.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT
The proposed Purveyor Specific Agreement (PSA) formalizes the City of Roseville’s commitments under the Water Forum 2050 framework and outlines how the City will manage its surface water, groundwater, and demand reduction programs to support the co-equal objectives of water supply reliability and protection of the Lower American River (LAR).
The PSA describes Roseville’s existing and planned water supply portfolio, including surface water supplies from Folsom Reservoir, groundwater and Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) facilities, recycled water, regional interties, and long-term conservation programs. It establishes how Roseville will manage supplies under normal, dry, driest, and critically low storage conditions, including prioritizing groundwater use during dry periods, reducing American River diversions in the driest conditions, and contributing 4,460 acre-feet of groundwater substitution water in three out of eight dry or critical years to support LAR flows.
The agreement also documents Roseville’s long-term reliability strategy, including planned expansion of ASR wells, participation in regional projects such as RiverArc, potential raw water pipeline improvements, Folsom Reservoir intake redundancy planning, and continued investment in conservation and compliance with state water efficiency regulations.
Approval of the PSA confirms Roseville’s continued regional collaboration and commitment to sustainable water management, climate adaptation, groundwater sustainability, and environmental stewardship while maintaining reliable water service for current and future customers. A copy of the PSA is attached.
THIRD INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE
WATER FORUM
The proposed Third Interagency Agreement for the Administration and Management of the Water Forum (Third Interagency Agreement) establishes the updated governance, administrative structure, and cost- sharing framework for continued implementation of the Water Forum Agreement through 2050. The Third
Interagency Agreement replaces the prior Interagency Agreement and reflects the updated roles and participation of Water Forum member agencies following the Water Forum 2050 renegotiation process.
Under the Third Interagency Agreement, the City of Sacramento will continue to host and administer the Water Forum Office as a division of its Department of Utilities. The Water Forum Office will provide staffing and administrative support to implement, monitor, and report on the Water Forum Agreement’s co-equal objectives of water supply reliability and environmental protection. Office staff, including the Executive Director, will be City of Sacramento employees.
Operating costs will be funded by participating agencies through a separate Funding Agreement on a cost- share basis. The agreement defines budget, staffing, contracting, insurance, indemnification, and liability provisions, and establishes a term through December 31, 2050, unless earlier terminated. Agencies may withdraw with notice, subject to financial obligations.
Approval of the Third Interagency Agreement allows the City to continue participating in and supporting regional implementation of the Water Forum Agreement under the updated administrative structure. A copy of this Agreement is attached.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s participation in the Water Forum Agreement 2050, approval of the Purveyor Specific Agreement (PSA), and execution of the Third Interagency Agreement will continue to be funded through the existing Water Forum cost-sharing framework previously authorized by Council.
On June 18, 2025, the City Council approved the interagency cost-sharing structure for the Water Forum Successor Effort and authorized execution of future annual cost-sharing agreements, subject to no substantive changes, adherence to Council-approved not-to-exceed amounts, and sufficient budget appropriation.
The remaining approved not-to-exceed cost-share amounts are:
• FY 2026-27: $223,131.
• FY 2027-28: $234,288.
• FY 2028-29: $246,008.
• FY 2029-30: $258,302.
Funding is annually included in the Water Administration budget within the Water Operations Fund and is supported by water utility rate revenue. Approval of this item does not create new or additional fiscal obligations beyond the previously authorized Water Forum cost-sharing commitments.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The City’s participation in the Water Forum Agreement 2050, approval of the Purveyor Specific Agreement (PSA), and execution of the Third Interagency Agreement meets the above criteria and is not subject to
CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
4. Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth
Respectfully Submitted,
George Hanson, Water Utility Manager
Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Director
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-080
2. Water Forum Agreement, MOU, & PSA
3. Third Interagency Agreement
4. Water Forum Members List
REVIEWERS:
George Hanson, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Created/Initiated - 3/2/2026 George Hanson, Environmental Utilities Department - Water Approved - 3/2/2026 Devin Whittington, Environmental Utilities Department - Technical Services Approved - 3/3/2026 Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Department - All Approved - 3/5/2026 Kelly Aye, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/18/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/19/2026 Ryan DeVore, City Clerk Department Approved - 3/19/2026 Dennis Kauffman, City Manager Department - Assistant City Manager Approved - 3/19/2026 Michelle Sheidenberger, City Attorney Department Approved - 3/19/2026 Dominick Casey, City Manager Department - City Manager Approved - 3/23/2026 Katrina Six, City Clerk Department Final Approval - 3/23/2026
RESOLUTION NO. 26-080
APPROVING THE WATER FORUM AGREEMENT 2050, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR WATER FORUM 2050, PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT,
AND THIRD INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND
MANAGEMENT OF THE WATER FORUM
WHEREAS, the Water Forum is a long-standing regional partnership that brings together water providers, environmental organizations, business interests, local governments, and community groups to resolve complex water management issues collaboratively; and
WHEREAS, Water Forum Agreement 2050 (WF2050) was developed through a multi- year, consensus-based negotiation process involving multiple Water Forum representatives; and
WHEREAS, WF2050 positions the Sacramento region to proactively address climate change impacts on water supply and river health while continuing a 25-year legacy of collaboration, shared problem-solving, and regional stewardship; and
WHEREAS, the stakeholder representatives to the Water Forum have concluded that the best mechanism to implement WF2050 is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among all signatories to the WF2050; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Purveyor Specific Agreement (PSA) formalizes the City of Roseville’s commitments under the WF2050 framework and outlines how the City will manage its surface water, groundwater, and demand reduction programs to support the co-equal objectives of water supply reliability and protection of the Lower American River; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Third Interagency Agreement for the Administration and Management of the Water Forum (Third Interagency Agreement) establishes the updated governance, administrative structure, and cost-sharing framework for continued implementation of the Water Forum Agreement through 2050
WHEREAS, the Water Forum Agreement 2050, Memorandum of Understanding for Water Forum 2050, Purveyor Specific Agreement, and Third Interagency Agreement for the Administration and Management of the Water Forum, has been reviewed by the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreements are hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute them on behalf of the City of Roseville.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this ___ day of ______________, 20__, by the following vote on roll call:
AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
City Clerk
Final Agreement
The Next Generation of Water Management in
the Sacramento Region
Signed April 2026
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 2
Water Forum Agreement 2050
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 4 THE WATER FORUM: PROTECTING THE RIVER AND REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY .......................................................................................... 4 Key Milestones in the Water Forum’s History ............................................................................................................................. 7 Commitment to The Water Forum Way ...................................................................................................................................... 8 WATER FORUM 2050: THE NEXT GENERATION ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Challenge of Climate Change .................................................................................................................................................... 10 A Positive Vision for the Future ................................................................................................................................................... 11 STRUCTURE OF THE WATER FORUM 2050 AGREEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 15 WF2050 Participating Organizations ........................................................................................................................................ 16 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR WATER FORUM 2050................................ ................................ .......................... 17 WATER FORUM 2050 PROGRAM AREAS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 22 COMMON THEMES AMONG WATER FORUM 2050 PROGRAM AREAS ....................................................................................................... 23 Collaboration and Partnership .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Adaptive Management................................................................................................................................................................ 23 External Engagement .................................................................................................................................................................. 23 AMERICAN RIVER CLIMATE ADAPTATION PROGRAM (ARCAP) ................................................................................................................. 25 PROGRAM AREA 1: AMERICAN RIVER FLOWS AND OPERATIONS .............................................................................................................. 32 Flow Management Standard ..................................................................................................................................................... 32 Flood Operations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Temperature and Other Water Management Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 42 PROGRAM AREA 2: AMERICAN RIVER CORRIDOR HE A LT H ........................................................................................................................ 46 American River Corridor Health Program ................................................................................................................................ 46 PROGRAM AREA 3: REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY SUSTAINABILITY .............................................................................................................. 51 Surface Water Management ...................................................................................................................................................... 51 Groundwater Management ....................................................................................................................................................... 58 Demand Management ................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Dry-Time Actions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 65 Land Use Decisions ...................................................................................................................................................................... 72 PROGRAM AREA 4: SCIENCE, MONITORING, AND DECISION SUPPORT .................................................................................................... 77 PROGRAM AREA 5: GOVERNANCE, FUNDING, AND ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................... 88 Governance ................................................................................................................................................................................... 91 Funding ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 113 Administration ............................................................................................................................................................................ 120 CAVEATS AND ASSURANCES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 128 American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP) ....................................................................................................... 128 American River Flows and Operations (ARFO) ...................................................................................................................... 129 Regional Water Supply Sustainability (WSS) ......................................................................................................................... 130 Science, Monitoring, and Decision Support .......................................................................................................................... 133 Governance, Funding, and Administration ........................................................................................................................... 133
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 3
PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 134 CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ........................................................................................................ 135 CARMICHAEL WATER DISTRICT PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ......................................................................................................... 144 CITY OF FOLSOM PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 150 CITY OF ROSEVILLE PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................................... 160 CITY OF SACRAMENTO PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 171 EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ........................................................................................... 188 EL DORADO IRRIGATION DISTRICT PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT .................................................................................................... 208 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY ARDEN SYSTEM AND CORDOVA SYSTEM PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT...................................... 218 PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT .................................................................................................... 225 SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ........................................................................................... 249 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT .................................................................................... 259 SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN WATER DISTRICT PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ..................................................................................... 262 SAN JUAN WATER DISTRICT CONSORTIUM PURVEYOR SPECIFIC AGREEMENT ...................................................................................... 270 GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 275 QUICK REFERENCE FOR COMMON ACRONYMS ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 279 LIST OF APPENDICES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 282 APPENDIX 1: ADVANCING THE SEVEN ELEMENTS OF THE FIRST WATER FORUM AGREEMENT APPENDIX 2: ARCAP TWO-YEAR WORKPLAN
APPENDIX 3: ENGAGEMENT WITH THE US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION APPENDIX 4: LIST OF TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS APPENDIX 5: ARCH PROGRAM PLANNING MATRIX
APPENDIX 6: DECLARATION OF FULL APPROPRIATION
APPENDIX 7: BRIDGE TO THE REGIONAL GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCIES AND WATER FORUM 2050 APPENDIX 8: WSS DEMAND MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
APPENDIX 9: METRICS AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENT AND TABLES APPENDIX 10: WATER FORUM AND DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES MOU APPENDIX 11: FIVE- AND ONE-YEAR WATER FORUM BUDGET
APPENDIX 12: COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION
APPENDIX 13: INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR WATER FORUM ADMINISTRATION Table of Figures
Figure 1. Water Forum Timeline, 1990–2024 ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2. Structure of WF2050 ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 Figure 3. Water Forum Governance Structure ................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 4. WF2050 Program Areas ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 5. Coequal Objectives and Guiding Principles Relationships with Activities, Metrics, and Reporting ................... 81 Figure 6. Metrics and Reporting Timeline ........................................................................................................................................ 83 Figure 7. Water Forum Governance Structure ................................................................................................................................. 92 Table of Tables
Table 1. Water Forum Purveyor Water Production (2014-23) ...................................................................................................... 53 Table 2. WF2050 Description of Operations ..................................................................................................................................... 67
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 4
Introduction
The Water Forum: Protecting the River
and Regional Water Supply
The lower American River (LAR) is one of the Sacramento region’s greatest treasures. Generations of Sacramento-area residents have grown up on the river and along the parkway, enjoying its rich ecosystem of plants and wildlife, as well as numerous recreational activities. Throughout history, the river has sustained the lives and livelihoods of local residents by providing them with drinking water.
But the river doesn’t just provide for the region; it also needs active stewardship.
In 2000, 40 different agencies, organizations,
citizen groups, and
businesses came together to sign the landmark Water Forum Agreement, a visionary long-term plan created to balance two coequal objectives:
P
rovide a reliable and safe water supply for the region’s economic health and planned development through to
the year 2030; and
Preserve the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the lower American River.
The Water Forum Agreement (WFA) was a bold experiment. People with vastly different views on the best uses of water agreed to work together toward mutual goals. Water agencies, environmental The lower American River
is an essential part of life in the
Sacramento region. It provides
drinking water to nearly
2 million people and is home to
43 species of fish, including the
endangered Central Valley
steelhead and fall-run Chinook
salmon. The river also offers
invaluable recreational and
aesthetic values for the region
and attracts nearly eight million
visitors per year.
The river corridor also helps
protect Sacramento-area
communities from floods and
plays an important role in
supplying water to the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,
which ultimately serves drinking
water for many Californians and
provides water for the state’s
agriculture.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 5
organizations, business groups, and other interested parties negotiated a 30-year plan for how the American River basin’s water would be managed and protected. The aim was to reduce the persistent conflicts over water resources that had historically plagued the region.
Before the Water Forum, the Sacramento area had seen its share of lawsuits, demonstrations, and political battles over planned water projects. Water providers and business interests were concerned that opposition to water development would hinder their ability to serve customers with a reliable water supply. At the same time, environmental advocates were alarmed by the ongoing decline of water-based ecosystems.
The agreement, reached after seven years of intense negotiations, included financial and operational commitments from water providers, as well as a promise from environmental organizations to support water providers based on the terms of the agreement. The first WFA included seven key elements that represented the strategies members1 used to meet the coequal objectives of water supply reliability and environmental stewardship. Over the past 25 years, these strategies have shaped water management in the Sacramento region, addressing both immediate needs and long-term sustainability.
The original Water Forum elements were:
1. Detailed plans for increased surface water supplies from rivers during average to wet years to support Sacramento's anticipated population and economic growth through 2030.
2. Water providers' commitment to actions during dry years to reduce surface water diversions to protect fish, wildlife, aesthetic, and recreational value of the river.
3. Plans to establish a new flow standard for the LAR that would improve water releases to better support fish.
4. A Habitat Management Element (HME) dedicating purveyor and federal resources toward preserving the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the LAR.
5. Comprehensive water conservation plans to meet regional water needs while reducing reliance on both groundwater and surface water.
6. Establishment of local agencies for groundwater management, to monitor groundwater use and implement a conjunctive use program.
7. Ongoing implementation and adaptation of the WFA through 2030 via the Water Forum Successor Effort (WFSE).
1 The term member in this document is intended to refer to an organization that is a signatory to the Water Forum.
Member and signatory can be used interchangeably.
The Water Forum brings
together a diverse group of
businesses, citizen groups,
environmentalists, water
managers, and local
governments in Sacramento,
Placer, and
El Dorado counties.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 6
These original Water Forum elements and the members’ progress in each are detailed in Appendix 1: Advancing the Seven Elements of the First Water Forum Agreement.
Now, after more than two decades, the Water Forum is widely regarded as a success and is often recognized as a model for similar initiatives. It has not only led to tangible accomplishments in water management and river health enhancement but has also built strong, collaborative relationships that have helped the region navigate severe droughts. These collaborations have enabled the region to invest in river restoration projects and major infrastructure projects without opposition or lawsuits, a testament to the trust and transparency that have been cultivated over the years.
The success of this partnership has earned the Sacramento area a statewide reputation as an innovative steward of regional water resources, providing a solid foundation for negotiating a new agreement necessary to tackle the challenges ahead. The challenges ahead are significant for maintaining a reliable water supply, and especially for a healthy ecosystem that relies on cold water.
HONORS AND AWARDS
1999 – Achievement Award from California Water Policy Conference 2000 – Association of California Water Agencies Clair A. Hill Water Agency Award 2000 – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Outstanding Environmental Achievement Award
2001 – League of California Cities Helen Putnam Award for Excellence 2001 – Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Award for outstanding contributions in Environmental-Economic Partnerships
2004 – Harvard University Kennedy School of Government “Top 50” Programs in the Innovations in American Government competition
2015 – American Water Resources Association, Csallany Institutional Award for Exemplary contributions to Water Resources Management
2015 – Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Award 2017 – Environmental Council of Sacramento Environmentalist of the Year Award The Water Forum was honored in both 2001 and 2015 with the Governor’s Environmental and Economic Leadership Award — the state’s top award for environmental stewardship — in recognition of its work to improve the lower American River riparian habitat and parkway, and to protect the Sacramento region’s water supply.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 7
KEY MILESTONES IN THE WATER FORUM’S HISTORY
Figure 1. Water Forum Timeline, 1990–2024
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 8
COMMITMENT TO THE WATER FORUM WAY
The Water Forum Way is an explicit set of mutual obligations that has guided Water Forum members’ engagement with one another since its inception. Members demonstrate adherence to the Water Forum Way through the following practices:
• Mutual gains approach and collaborative effort to seek consensus and build trust • Participating with an open-minded, respectful, and interest-based approach to all discussions
• Working through challenges, search for and find balance across the Water Forum’s coequal objectives
• Understanding Water Forum processes and interested parties • Emphasize transparency through a group disclosure process • Surfacing and seeking to understand and accommodate differences and interests among Water Forum members
• Working with diverse groups to enable voices to be heard and to have an opportunity to have a seat at the table
All members of the Water Forum, including staff and consultants, commit to adhering to the Water Forum Way and hold one another accountable for reinforcing this practice.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 9
Water Forum 2050: The Next Generation
As the Water Forum looks to the next twenty-five years, it faces a different set of challenges and a new regulatory landscape, including the impacts of climate change, increasingly challenged environmental conditions, increased regulations, and economic pressures.
Given the magnitude and timing of the expected challenges, the negotiations for the new Wate Forum Agreement were initiated in 2020 to prepare the region to better respond to changes as they materialize.
• Shifting hydrology: Climate change presents the single most significant threat to achieving the Water Forum’s coequal objectives of water supply reliability and environmental stewardship of the LAR. While the first WFA focused primarily on mitigating the effects of dry years, the region is now experiencing a complex mix of hotter and drier periods, coupled with more intense bursts of rainfall and a diminishing snowpack. This pattern will challenge water storage infrastructure, particularly Folsom Reservoir, which must balance flood control needs with storing water for drought periods—challenges that were not anticipated in the first WFA. • Environmental Challenges and Fisheries: Salmon and steelhead populations in the LAR face significant threats due to suboptimal flow and temperature conditions.
Additionally, climate change impacts and other factors, including ocean and Delta conditions, have contributed to reduced fish populations. Continuing habitat enhancements and fostering continued collaboration with agencies, including the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), for suitable flows and temperatures will be crucial for mitigating these challenges.
• Operational Challenges: Folsom Reservoir is owned and operated by the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) as part of the broader Central Valley Project (CVP), a statewide water delivery system. As such, Reclamation must consider and balance the needs for water beyond the American River watershed within its operations. There are times when out-of-basin demands of the CVP may seem at odds with the needs of the LAR and the American River region. As the impacts of climate change further constrain water supplies, those times of competing demands are likely to increase and intensify.
Ongoing coordination and engagement with Reclamation will be crucial for the continued success of the coequal objectives and ensuring that American River interests are fully considered within the broader context of CVP operations. • Water Supply Reliability: The threat of a reduced snowpack and critically low storage conditions at Folsom Reservoir (i. e., "dead pool"), when water levels are too low to meet supply needs, represents a severe risk to both water supply and river health. Multi- year droughts have previously brought the reservoir to critical levels, impacting water reliability for over a million residents.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 10
The Water Forum’s Flow Management Standard, which includes minimum flows, temperature management protocols, and storage target provisions, offers one strategy for mitigating this risk. However, further actions will be needed to adapt to climate-driven extremes in hydrology, including support for more diversified supply portfolios, such as enhanced conjunctive use, alternative or expanded diversion points, and the capture and underground storage of unstorable surface water, to enable regional water providers to reduce their reliance on American River supplies during drought conditions. • Groundwater Management: The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014 expanded groundwater regulatory requirements, requiring local agencies to form Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs) and create long-term Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs). SGMA and the GSAs now guide groundwater management across California, superseding many features of the first WFA’s groundwater element. • Rising Regulatory Pressures: Since 2000, state regulations related to water have undergone significant expansion, introducing mandates that have raised compliance costs and created new challenges for water purveyors. Increased regulation now affects every aspect of water management, from groundwater sustainability and surface water flows to conservation requirements and long-term planning. For example, the State's role in water conservation has expanded, gradually surpassing the framework set by the first WFA. The most recent example is the Making Conservation a California Way of Life regulation, adopted by the State Water Board in August 2024, which solidified conservation as a permanent state mandate. • Water Affordability: The costs of providing water are increasing, driven by rising expenses for regulatory compliance, infrastructure maintenance, and essential supplies, including energy and chemicals. At the same time, revenues are impacted as conservation measures reduce demand and customers resist rate increases. This financial strain on local water providers highlights the need for cost-effective, transparent management strategies that align with public expectations.
CHALLENGE OF CLIMATE CHANGE
Water Forum members have identified climate change as the most significant challenge to the Water Forum’s coequal objectives of balancing reliable water supplies while protecting the health of the LAR environment. To assess the impacts of climate change and population growth on water supply reliability and river health through 2050, the Water Forum conducted a technical analysis that compared projected conditions to historical data.
This analysis, Water Forum 2.0 – Ad Hoc Technical Team (AHTT) Study Plan Analysis Report, was led by a team of experts from the water, business, public agency, and environmental sectors. It built upon Reclamation’s 2022 American River Basin Study, applying its data to a focused examination of the LAR.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 11
Key findings included:
• Hydrology: Runoff is projected to peak earlier due to declining snowpack conditions, while the frequency and severity of multi-year droughts are expected to increase. Multi-year droughts similar to the 2014-16 event are likely to shift from occurring once every 100 years to once every 10 years under moderate climate change assumptions. As a result, the region is expected to find itself in drought-response mode more frequently, with extreme drought events becoming increasingly common. Current regional operations may also prove less effective due to shifts in the timing and volume of runoff. • Water Supply Reliability: Future conditions indicate a decline in surface water reliability, which will result in an increased reliance on groundwater. This reduced availability of surface water will necessitate greater flexibility in water management strategies.
Additionally, the frequency of critically low storage levels at Folsom Reservoir is expected to rise, presenting challenges for existing operations. As a result, proactive groundwater management in wet years will become essential for the region's water supply reliability. • River Health and Fisheries: Temperatures will continue to be a limiting factor for resident salmonids on the LAR. Climate change is likely to significantly increase the number of days when river temperatures reach levels that are unsuitable for the survival of salmonids. This rise in unsuitable conditions will pose challenges for fish survival 2, highlighting the need
for actions that effectively balance the beneficial uses of available surface water to support both fisheries and water supply needs.
Overall, the study provided a technical foundation for collaborative solutions and informed the Water Forum by identifying gaps in water supply and river corridor health under future conditions. It also set the foundation for a regional dialogue on potential adaptation tools, projects, and measures to address these critical issues.
A POSITIVE VISION FOR THE FUTURE
The challenges facing water management today present an opportunity to strengthen and modernize the WFA for its continued relevance in the evolving landscape.
As with the first WFA, the Water Forum 2050 Agreement (WF2050) is a commitment to working together towards coequal objectives, this time to overcome a different set of challenges. The intent is that cooperation leads to increased support and drives investments in resiliency programs, enhancing the region’s reputation and improving competitiveness for water management and ecosystem enhancement grants. Growing support from interested parties will
2 Studies have shown that summer river temperatures above species-specific tolerances can cause direct adult mortality and reduce egg and juvenile survival. In addition, barrier-limited or low-elevation populations can’t access cold-water refugia, increasing their climate vulnerability.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 12
stretch local investments further, leading to more efficient and effective water management programs.
While the challenges are significant, interested parties at the Water Forum share a positive vision for the future. This vision is built on the principles of mutual benefit, with a renewed WFA serving as the foundation. In this future, regional ecosystems and the economy remain resilient and sustainable, and citizens enjoy reliable, sufficient, and safe water supplies. Communities can weather multi-year droughts without compromising the health of their landscapes or water- based ecosystems.
As conditions continue to evolve, WF2050 provides a framework to address current and emerging water management challenges while safeguarding the environmental health of the region for future generations.
Structure of the Water Forum 2050 Agreement
The WF2050 restructures the seven elements from the first WFA into five Program Areas:
1. American River Flows and Operations
2. American River Corridor Health
3. Regional Water Supply Sustainability
4. Science, Monitoring, and Decision Support
5. Governance, Funding, and Administration
Each Program Area is designed to support the coequal objectives by outlining specific principles, actions, and activities directed to the relevant area of focus. Recognizing that climate change presents the most significant threat to achieving the coequal objectives, the American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP) is a cross-cutting program designed to accelerate progress in all five Program Areas by developing and targeting additional volumes of water to directly support the coequal objectives. ARCAP aims to better manage water in the face of climate change by voluntarily linking agencies, infrastructure, and policies—creating a truly regional water system where water is managed by agencies to be available when and where it’s needed, and cold water is preserved in the American River for fish and future supply is protected.
The WF2050 agreement is a voluntary agreement between signatories that functions through mutual commitments made to support the coequal objectives, implement the guiding principles, and uphold specific commitments relevant thereto.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 13
Figure 2. Structure of WF2050
The WF2050 Program Areas (Figure 2) incorporate many of the elements from the first WFA, adapted to meet the region's evolving needs over the next 25 years. For example, the American River Corridor Health Program Area includes the Habitat Management element, and American River Flows and Operations integrates the Water Forum’s Flow Management Standard.
Additionally, Governance, Funding, and Administration introduces a new pathway for the Water Forum while maintaining the major components of the Water Forum governance structure (Figure 3).
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 14
Figure 3. Water Forum Governance Structure
The WF2050 includes:
Coequal Objectives: Reaffirmation of the long-standing mission and vision of the Water Forum, emphasizing a dual commitment to water supply reliability and environmental stewardship.
Guiding Principles: Foundational guidelines to drive the actions of the Water Forum and its members, helping to ensure that Water Forum efforts remain aligned with the core values and objectives.
Program Elements: Core elements of the Water Forum’s work, defining roles and responsibilities in the areas of American River Corridor Health; American River Flows and Operations; Regional Water Supply Sustainability; Science, Monitoring, and Decision Support; and Governance, Funding, and Administration – supported and accelerated by the American River Climate Adaptation Program.
Metrics: Data and information for monitoring and assessment to provide a framework for evaluation, helping to ensure that initiatives are effective and impactful.
Supported Projects: A list of regional initiatives and projects broadly supported by the Water Forum, highlighting collective efforts to enhance water supply and environmental health.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 15
Acknowledgments
The success of WF2050 builds on the foundation established by those who brought the first WFA to life. Many individuals and organizations have contributed their time, expertise, and resources throughout the negotiation and development process. Their commitment to addressing the region's water supply and environmental challenges has been essential in shaping a comprehensive framework for the next 25 years.
The foundation of the WF2050 reflects the vision and commitment of those who shaped the Water Forum. Special recognition goes to original Water Forum members who have continued to participate: Ron Stork of Friends of the River, Clyde Macdonald of Save the American River Association, Jim Ray of the North State Building Industry Association/MacKay & Somps, and Brian Holloway of Sacramento Association of Realtors, whose leadership was essential to the success of both negotiations.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 16
WF2050 PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS
Thank you to the organizations and their representatives who devoted countless hours to participating in “Water Forum 2.0” (WF2050) negotiations. The Water Forum would not be possible without the dedication of its members.
Business Caucus
AKT Development*
Associated General Contractors*
North State Building Industry
Association*
Sacramento Association of Realtors*
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of
Commerce*
Sacramento Regional Builders Exchange
Green Acres Nursery & Supply
Environmental Caucus
Environmental Council of Sacramento*
Friends of the River*
Save the American River Association*
Sierra Club Mother Lode Chapter*
Public Caucus
American River Flood Control District
American River Parkway Foundation
City of Rancho Cordova
City of Sacramento Planning
Department*
League of Women Voters, Sacramento
County *
Placer County
Sacramento Area Council of
Governments
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Sacramento County*
Sacramento Regional Parks
Sacramento Valley Conservancy
Sacramento Municipal Utility District *
Water Caucus
California American Water*
Carmichael Water District*
Citrus Heights Water District*
City of Folsom*
City of Roseville*
City of Sacramento*
East Bay Municipal Utility District
El Dorado Irrigation District*
El Dorado Water Agency*
Fair Oaks Water District*
Golden State Water Company/Arden-
Cordova Water District*
Orange Vale Water Company*
Placer County Water Agency*
Regional Water Authority*
Sacramento Suburban Water District*
Sacramento County Water Agency*
San Juan Water District*
* Denotes an organization that was a
Signatory to the 2000 agreement.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 17
Memorandum of Understanding for
Water Forum 2050
The stakeholder representatives have concluded that the best mechanism to implement Water Forum 2050 is a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among all signatories to the WF2050 Agreement. By memorializing the substance of the WF2050 Agreement, this MOU creates the overall commitment to Water Forum 2050.
All signatories agree that by signing the MOU, they agree to carry out all the actions specified for them in the WF2050 Agreement.
Preamble
A diverse group of business leaders, environmentalists, citizen groups, water managers, and local government representatives has carefully reviewed the region’s water future and the anticipated impacts of climate change. They found that unless we act now, our region risks a future marked by water shortages, environmental degradation, contamination, threats to groundwater reliability, and limitations to economic prosperity.
Joining together as the Water Forum, these community leaders from El Dorado, Sacramento, and Placer counties have spent thousands of hours analyzing the environmental and water supply needs of the region, focusing on the Lower American River, agreeing on principles to guide development of regional solutions, and negotiating the Water Forum 2050 Agreement.
This diverse group agrees that the optimal approach is a comprehensive package of interconnected actions that will achieve two coequal objectives:
Provide a reliable and safe water supply for the region’s economic health and planned development through to the year 2050;
and
Preserve the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the lower American River.
Recitals
1. Whereas, a reliable water supply is needed by current and future residents, businesses, and agriculture; and
2. Whereas, the lower American River is recognized as an important natural resource which should be protected and preserved for future generations by all Water Forum interested parties; and
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 18
3. Whereas, the Sacramento region’s groundwater resources are being successfully managed through Groundwater Sustainability Plans that have been approved by the State Department of Water Resources, and the Water Forum serves as a place to exchange information, concerns, and ideas regarding the management of this resource; and
4. Whereas, water purveyors and others have for years sought to develop additional safe, reliable water supplies; and
5. Whereas, the environmental community and others in the region have for years sought to restore the fishery, wildlife, recreational, and aesthetic values of the lower American River, protect and preserve the American River Watershed, and the region's groundwater supplies, including the environmental resources they support; and
6. Whereas, all signatories continue to recognize the potential benefits of mutually supporting each other’s goals and working together, as well as the collective risk of pursuing independent objectives in isolation; and
7. Whereas, the framework of an interest-based negotiation process cannot provide exactly equivalent benefits for all, but in most cases does make it possible for stakeholders to obtain what they need in a Water Forum 2050 Agreement.
Now, Therefore Be It Resolved That:
1. All signatories to this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agree that participation in Water Forum 2050 is in the best interest of water consumers and the region as a whole.
All signatories will endorse and, where indicated, participate in implementing the attached Water Forum 2050 Agreement, in accordance with the five Program Areas, and subject to relevant caveats and assurances:
• American River Flows and Operations
• American River Corridor Health
• Regional Water Supply Sustainability
• Governance, Funding, and Administration
• Science, Monitoring, and Decision Support
2. Individual Purveyor Specific Agreements (PSAs) were negotiated as part of the Water Forum 2050 Agreement and are incorporated therein.
3. All signatories will have equal standing in the Water Forum, regardless of whether they belong to the Public, Water, Business, or Environmental caucus.
Term of the Memorandum of Understanding
This MOU shall remain in force and effect until December 31, 2050.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 19
Legal Authority
Nothing in this MOU or the attached Water Forum 2050 Agreement is intended to give any signatory, agency, entity, or organization expansion of any existing authority.
Non-Contractual Agreement
This MOU and the attached Water Forum 2050 Agreement are intended to embody general principles agreed upon between and among the signatories. Still, they are not intended to, and do not, create contractual relationships, rights, obligations, duties, or remedies enforceable in a court of law by, between, or among the signatories or any third parties.
In witness thereof, the undersigned parties have executed this MOU this XX day of April, 2026.
Business Caucus
AKT Development
Associated General Contractors
North State Building Industry Association
Sacramento Association of Realtors
Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce
Sacramento Regional Builders Exchange
Green Acres Nursery & Supply
Environmental Caucus
Environmental Council of Sacramento
Friends of the River
Save the American River Association
Sierra Club Mother Lode Chapter
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 20
Public Caucus
American River Parkway Foundation
City of Rancho Cordova
City of Sacramento
League of Women Voters, Sacramento County
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
Sacramento County
Sacramento Regional Parks
Sacramento Valley Conservancy
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Water Caucus
California American Water
Carmichael Water District
Citrus Heights Water District
City of Folsom
City of Roseville
City of Sacramento
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 21
East Bay Municipal Utility District
El Dorado Irrigation District
Fair Oaks Water District
Golden State Water Company
Orange Vale Water Company
Placer County Water Agency
Regional Water Authority
Sacramento Suburban Water District
Sacramento County Water Agency
San Juan Water District
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 22
Water Forum 2050 Program Areas
Water Forum 2050 (WF2050) comprises five key Program Areas (Figure 4), crafted to support the coequal objectives and shape and focus the work of the Water Forum over the next 25 years. The five Program Areas are supplemented by the American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP), a cross-cutting program designed to focus and accelerate progress in all areas by seeking to develop and target additional volumes of water to support the coequal objectives.
Figure 4. WF2050 Program Areas
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 23
Common Themes Among Water Forum 2050 Program
Areas
Spanning all WF2050 Program Areas are common themes that are foundational to the Water Forum 2050 Agreement. Collaboration and partnership, adaptive management, and advocacy will be central to the work of the Water Forum over the next 25 years, supporting the coequal objectives in the unique context of the challenges the region will face due to climate change.
COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIP
At its core, the Water Forum is a venue for effective collaboration and partnership. In addition to the Water Forum’s diverse group of member organizations, external partners also inform and influence the work of the Water Forum and/or support the coequal objectives through shared goals. The diversity of member organizations and partners offers valuable opportunities for the sharing of information and resources in support of the coequal objectives, in a manner that is focused and includes a regional perspective that can otherwise be lost when operating in isolation. Within all the Water Forum 2050 Program Areas, opportunities for collaboration and partnership are identified as they relate to the activities and principles of the specific program.
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Continuously evaluating regional conditions relative to the coequal objectives and the effectiveness of the Water Forum’s work is a cornerstone of the 2050 agreement. There is a shared understanding that climate change poses the greatest challenge to the coequal objectives over the next 25 years. However, there is uncertainty regarding the potential severity and timing of realized impacts on the region. Low storage at Folsom Reservoir, increased river temperatures, and more intense wet and dry cycles are expected; however, it is not possible to predict with precision what these will mean for the region or what the most effective responses will be. Each of the Water Forum 2050 Program Areas acknowledges this uncertainty and includes elements to evaluate and adjust priorities and activities as an understanding of regional conditions and needs evolve over the life of the agreement. The Water Forum 2050 agreement also includes a robust Metrics and Reporting section that specifies metrics to track the implementation of the agreement and the viability of the coequal objectives, and outlines when and how those metrics will be reviewed and considered.
EXTERNAL ENGAGEMENT
One of the greatest strengths of the Water Forum is the ability to garner and leverage regional support for projects, programs, and activities focused on the coequal objectives. Ultimately, the challenges the region will face over the next 25 years will require action on a scale that exceeds the members’ ability to implement. Solutions will require investments from state and federal
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 24
partners. Water Forum support and external engagement significantly enhance the likelihood that funding will be allocated to the region. The Water Forum 2050 Program Areas identify where external engagement is expected to be key to the success of the work.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 25
American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP)
Water Forum members recognize that climate change presents the most significant threat to achieving the coequal objectives of water supply reliability and environmental stewardship of the LAR. Climate change has the potential to adversely impact the region in many ways, including those listed below:
• Accelerated decline of salmonids, recreation, and water quality due to decreased flows and increased river temperatures in the LAR.3
• Decreased reliability of the region’s urban water supply due to changes in hydrology, and increased strain on statewide water project operations. 3 • Increased threat of external claims for American River water due to water-shortage pressure elsewhere in the state.
• Increased drying of soils and plants due to higher temperatures. • Increased need for overall regional water resilience due to evolving regulatory requirements.
These extreme threats demand the timely and substantial watershed resilience measures contemplated as part of the American River Climate Adaptation Program (ARCAP), a multi-caucus problem-solving program seeking to develop and target additional volumes of water toward Water Forum coequal objectives. ARCAP offers a better way for the region to manage water as
3 The Water Forum Ad Hoc Technical Team report of 2022 highlighted significant challenges that will result from climate change, including:
• The region will experience more frequent and more severe droughts and flood events. This pattern will challenge the capability of water storage infrastructure, particularly Folsom Reservoir’s ability to provide flood protection and reliable water supplies.
• Salmon and steelhead populations in the lower American River will face significant threats due to suboptimal flows and temperature conditions and poor genetic diversity. • Folsom storage is projected to be at critically low levels more often due to climate change, creating a substantial risk to regional water supply reliability.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 26
climate conditions become more extreme. It enhances the five Program Areas by voluntarily linking agencies, infrastructure, and policies—creating a truly regional water system where water is managed by agencies to be available when and where it’s needed, and cold water is preserved in the American River for fish and future supply is protected.
The ARCAP intends to make measurable quantities of water available to provide demonstrable benefits to both of the Water Forum’s coequal objectives. Collectively, these water quantities will be referred to as ARCAP Water and can be thought of as an insurance policy against the challenges described above. ARCAP Water may include contractual or set-aside supply, or stored water that is managed by one or more entities. ARCAP Water could be provided from multiple sources, including:
• Regional conjunctive use operations – water stored in the groundwater basin through in- lieu or other recharge and recovery methods. The Water Forum, in collaboration with key partners, will examine the nexus between these activities and the planned Sacramento Regional Water Bank.
• RiverArc – relocating the source of water supply from an American River diversion to a Sacramento River diversion for some agencies.
• Reservoir reoperation – potential operational changes to provide ARCAP Water and enhance coldwater pool conditions in Folsom Reservoir and seek benefits from Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations (FIRO), or potentially through other CVP operational changes.
• Capture, storage, and use of un-storable water – may include recharge of excess water during flood operations when releases are well above optimal riverine ecological levels. • Vineyard Treatment Plant expansion – potential additional capacity in the Freeport diversion on the Sacramento River if the Vineyard Treatment Plant were expanded. • Sacramento Water Treatment Plant expansion – The City of Sacramento may increase the capacity of this plant, making additional Sacramento River water available. • Water conservation actions – actions expected to reduce water demand and diversions, potentially making water available for ARCAP .
• Other sources may be identified.
ARCAP Water could offer the following benefits for the American River region:
• Additional supplies for water agencies serving communities in the Sacramento Region that are facing significant water shortages during droughts or other conditions. • Augmented storage in Folsom Reservoir to enhance the coldwater pool and reduce river temperatures to benefit fish.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 27
• Augmented flows in the LAR to benefit fish.
• Increased operational flexibility to benefit CVP operations. • Increased capture, use, and storage of un-storable and excess flood waters. • Increased groundwater storage regionally to enhance conjunctive use and support Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems.
• Demonstration of our region’s commitment to proactively addressing climate issues and maintaining a sustainable American River watershed.
• Demonstration to Reclamation of our region’s commitment towards Folsom Reservoir storage during dry and critical times.
The ARCAP is ambitious, and several important issues must be addressed before this program becomes operational. Because many outstanding questions will be unanswered during the WF2050 negotiations, the ARCAP includes elements focused on technical analysis and resolution of important issues. These technical and interested-party processes will rely on the technical coordination and cooperation of the Regional Water Authority (RWA) (see Program Elements) and consultation with Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSAs).
There is a precedent for such an ambitious initiative by the Water Forum. The Flow Management Standard (FMS), for example, has become a major focus of the Water Forum’s activities and deliberations over the last two decades, ultimately leading to changes in CVP operations on the LAR. Like the ARCAP , the process for developing and implementing the FMS was not fully defined until after the original WFA was signed.
Guiding Principles
The ARCAP activities will support the Water Forum’s coequal objectives by aligning with the guiding principles below:
1. ARCAP Water will provide water supply and ecosystem benefits, and will strive to provide multiple benefits whenever possible.
2. ARCAP Water will be created by using existing or planned regional water sources.
3. Program design and implementation will be conducted openly with all caucuses.
4. Developing and implementing the ARCAP will be a long-term endeavor, but it will progress incrementally to build confidence and support with early implementation, resulting in collective successes.
5. The role of the Water Forum staff in ARCAP development and implementation will focus on coordination with Water Forum members, conducting analyses, advocating for programs and funding, and tracking progress.
6. ARCAP analyses and coordination will be covered in partnership with RWA and the Water Forum.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 28
7. ARCAP questions and issues related to conjunctive use (and possibly the Sacramento Regional Water Bank) will be addressed through a partnership between the Water Forum and RWA, involving water purveyor members and regional GSAs.
8. The ARCAP will work in concert with the FMS and other Water Forum elements to support the coequal objectives.
9. ARCAP Water will not be used to meet the minimum regulatory requirements as defined by the FMS or SGMA (as those are expected to be met per existing regulations and legislation).
10. The use of the Water Forum members’ facilities and water supplies for the ARCAP should provide a benefit to those organizations.
Program Elements
To implement the ARCAP Guiding Principles listed above, the Water Forum will commit to the programs, actions, and activities below. These actions are designed to support the Water Forum’s coequal objectives through the implementation of the ARCAP and are subject to the relevant caveats and assurances.
1. Technical, Operational, Regulatory, and Legal Issues Several issues must be resolved before the ARCAP can come to fruition. These issues include:
1. What will be the target volume (if any) of ARCAP Water?
2. What are the sources of water for the ARCAP?
3. Who will own and manage ARCAP Water?
4. How, where, and when will ARCAP Water be stored?
5. Where and when will ARCAP Water be used?
6. How will the Water Forum and members track the sources and destinations of ARCAP water?
7. How will the ARCAP perform under various climate scenarios, including multi-year droughts, critically low storage (aka deadpool), and water supply curtailments?
8. What additional infrastructure will be needed to implement the ARCAP?
9. What will be the technical and physical limitations of the ARCAP?
10. What is the potential maximum volume of water that could be developed through the ARCAP?
11. How much groundwater recharge and recovery is possible in the region?
12. How much groundwater recharge and recovery is needed in the region?
13. Could the modified timing of released ARCAP Water enhance LAR temperature conditions?
14. How can changes in the point of diversion (e.g., from Folsom Reservoir or the LAR to Freeport) provide additional water storage or flow for the LAR?
15. What is the expected increase in un-storable water in the American River system, and what would be necessary to capture and store that water under the ARCAP?
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 29
16. Could FIRO increase ARCAP Water supplies, and if so, how much?
17. What opportunities exist to create and track ARCAP Water within regional demand management and conservation actions (including climate-ready landscapes and other emerging areas of research)?
18. How will inter-agency commitments to ARCAP be recognized, and how will their operations be counted?
ARCAP will consider the integrated interactions of demand (including demand management actions), supply, source waters, and conjunctive use that may impact the potential benefits of ARCAP Water, among other considerations. Appendix 2 outlines the first two years of technical, operational, regulatory, and legal analyses necessary to begin answering these questions and indicates the roles and responsibilities of the Water Forum and key partners (RWA, GSAs, etc.) in completing the various analyses.
2. External Engagement Strategy
The ARCAP will require partners beyond the signatories to WF2050 to be successful. Sustained efforts to communicate with potential partners will maximize the probability of success. Some of the entities identified for outreach include:
Reclamation – Changes in CVP operations may be sought to help establish or store ARCAP Water. This will require a strategy for ongoing engagement with Reclamation that is consistent among members and flexible in approach. The Water Forum will strive to communicate to Reclamation that ARCAP actions help support their goals of delivering water with minimal shortages and maintaining operational flexibility.
Regional GSAs – Active coordination with the GSAs will be implemented as part of ARCAP and will include the sharing of relevant analyses and data, as well as general information sharing to raise awareness and explore opportunities for collaboration.
California Department of Water Resources (DWR) – The DWR has a regional watershed planning initiative (which RWA is piloting for this region) and is likely to continue serving as a source of funding for water infrastructure and climate resiliency actions. As such, DWR should be kept informed of the ARCAP effort and successes.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) – The SWRCB would be involved in any transfers of water supplies that utilize water rights established after 1914 or modifications of existing water rights to add new points of diversion.
Fisheries agencies, including the National Marine Fisheries Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Federal Fish and Wildlife Service, are likely to have valuable information on employing ARCAP Water to benefit the aquatic ecosystem.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 30
Other entities, such as the California Legislature and Congress, will likely have a keen interest in the ARCAP efforts, and the Water Forum should strive to provide them with regular progress updates.
3. Coordination, Management, and Implementation of ARCAP Water The implementation and management of ARCAP Water will be coordinated with regional and external partners. It is expected that the Water Forum will partner with RWA and others on technical analyses to inform the development and deployment of ARCAP Water, will coordinate among members as ARCAP is implemented, and will track development. Additionally, the Water Forum will advocate for programs and funding as needed.
4. Program Review and Refinement
It will be necessary to periodically evaluate and refine the ARCAP, given its scope and complexity.
A work group composed of Water Forum and RWA members/staff will be established to oversee and guide the ongoing work for ARCAP . A work plan for the ARCAP , including a budget and scope of work, is included in Appendix 2. The ARCAP workplan will be reviewed and updated annually.
The annual ARCAP review will analyze the program's successes, challenges, and barriers. A summary of the ARCAP review will be included in the Water Forum's Five-year Status Report (or other periodic Water Forum publication) and will include specific, agreed-upon reporting metrics.
The ARCAP review will, as appropriate, guide changes to the program to ensure long-term success.
Caveats and Assurances
The following list of assurances is intended to ensure that the Water Forum develops and implements the ARCAP through a concerted and good-faith effort that supports the coequal objectives and embodies the Water Forum's Values.
1. The ARCAP will be developed and implemented, with opportunities for open cross-caucus discussions and guidance, utilizing the Water Forum’s decision-making processes. This applies to both technical processes and member deliberations.
2. The Water Forum will work jointly with RWA and the GSAs to resolve technical issues during ARCAP development and implementation. Staff from RWA and the Water Forum will work together in a collaborative relationship to support this program and will engage with the regional GSAs.
3. The ARCAP approach will strive to add value and avoid creating added costs, duplicative processes, and bureaucracy.
4. The ability of Water Forum members to identify and employ ARCAP Water does not imply that the American River is in excess conditions.
5. ARCAP implementation will complement and support other Water Forum programs (e.g., FMS).
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 31
6. The Water Forum will review the successes and challenges of the ARCAP and refine the program as needed, with adjustments agreed upon by all caucuses.
7. ARCAP assets (e.g., water rights and contracts, wells, diversion works) will remain under the control of the owning agencies.
8. The role of the Water Forum (including its staff and members) will be to coordinate ARCAP actions, complete agreed-upon technical analyses and studies, advocate for programs and funding, and track and review the status of these programs.
9. The Water Forum and RWA will respect the operational authority and third-party agreements of their members, which are necessary for their contributions to ARCAP Water.
10. No part of the ARCAP will abridge the authorities, entitlements, or agreements of Water Forum members without the express consent of the relevant parties.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 32
Program Area 1: American River Flows
and Operations
The American River Flows and Operations (ARFO) Program Area includes three areas of focus for Water Forum activities and commitments:
• Flow Management Standard
• Flood Operations
• Temperature Management and other Water Management Infrastructure
FLOW MANAGEMENT STANDARD
The Flow Management Standard (FMS) for the LAR was envisioned and prescribed under the original WFA, and the first iteration was completed in 2006. As new data, tools, and technology have become available, the FMS has been updated and refined to support the Water Forum’s coequal objectives
4. The features of the FMS (i.e., minimum reservoir releases, storage targets, and temperature management protocols) provide guidelines for the operation of Folsom Dam and the LAR to help protect river health and preserve water supply reliability, particularly during droughts when water supplies are reduced and competing demands arise.
The degree to which the FMS features are included in the operations and planning of Folsom Reservoir depends greatly on engagement with Reclamation and advocacy for regional interests within CVP operations. The flows and river temperatures on the LAR are directly related to the operations of Folsom Dam, which Reclamation owns and operates as part of the broader CVP .
The CVP is an extensive, multi-purpose network of dams, reservoirs, canals, hydroelectric power plants, and other facilities that span 400 miles of inland California, providing water supplies to municipal (including Sacramento area purveyors), industrial, refuge, and agricultural water users.
Additional authorized purposes of the CVP include flood protection, recreation, navigation, flow
4 In late 2024 the most recent iteration of the FMS was referred to as the Modified Flow Management Standard (MFMS) and was referenced as such in the 2019 Biological Opinion.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 33
augmentation, fish and wildlife enhancement, fish and wildlife mitigation, power generation, and water quality enhancement (particularly in the Delta). Proportionally, both the demand on CVP water within the American River region and the storage capacity of Folsom Reservoir are relatively small parts of the broader CVP demands and storage capacities, respectively. However, the proximity of Folsom Reservoir to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta) in comparison to other CVP storage facilities makes it one of the first facilities called upon when Delta water quality improvements are needed. This action is further fueled by Folsom Reservoir’s small storage capacity relative to historical runoff volumes
5 and an underlying perspective by Reclamation and
other CVP contractors that Folsom Reservoir is more likely to refill each year as compared to other CVP reservoirs.
Historically, Water Forum members have engaged with Reclamation and other federal and state agencies to advocate for changes in operations and infrastructure that could support the coequal objectives6. In seeking implementation of the FMS and to reduce potential resistance, the Water Forum strived to balance the features of the FMS such that the impacts to out-of-basin uses were minimized. However, LAR conditions, particularly river temperatures, have been severely challenged over the last several decades, and CVP operations for broader system-wide objectives, including the magnitude of deliveries and the contractual priority of out-of-basin water users, can be at odds with the needs of the LAR. For example, Folsom Reservoir releases are frequently at their peak during the summer months to support CVP deliveries outside of the basin and to maintain water quality in the Delta. However, these increased releases in the summer months can challenge temperature management on the river, particularly for the fall spawning season.
River temperatures on the LAR have long been understood to be the primary limiting factor for salmonid species in the river. Current temperature targets for salmonid species, as stated in various regulatory requirements, are frequently exceeded, and detrimental temperature conditions are particularly prevalent and extreme in drought years due to lower storage (and therefore less cold water) within Folsom Reservoir and lower flows below Nimbus Dam.
Additionally, the releases from Folsom Reservoir into Lake Natoma create further challenges for temperature management due to the warming that can occur before the water is released into the LAR. Over the last 15 years, the temperatures known to be optimal for the resident salmonids' key life stages have rarely been met on LAR and have trended towards upper tolerable in the best of years. Droughts have become increasingly frequent over the last 20 years and are projected to become more severe and frequent in the future. Temperature models indicate that under climate change, river temperatures are expected to routinely be markedly above the suitable ranges for
5 Folsom Reservoir storage capacity is just under 1 million-acre-feet (MAF) and the historical annual Folsom Reservoir inflow between 1976 and 2024 was just over 2.7 MAF. In approximately two-thirds of the years between 1988 and 2024, a portion of inflow could not be stored due to Folsom Reservoir’s flood management responsibilities . 6 Water Forum and Reclamation signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in 2021 to formalize information sharing and communication on LAR conditions, operations, and forecasts.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 34
resident salmonids for nearly half of the year, creating unhealthy or even lethal conditions for the fish. Extreme climate change scenarios indicate that the survival of the salmonids in the LAR could be severely threatened.
Temperature management improvements, including both operational and physical enhancements, will be crucial under future conditions to enhance the health of the river and support the Water Forum's coequal objectives. Therefore, FMS Program Elements include opportunities for strategic partnerships and engagement related to the Water Forum's operational temperature management activities through the maintenance and updating of the FMS. Improvements to temperature management infrastructure are discussed in other sections of this program area, along with specific challenges and opportunities related to managing the cold-water resources on the LAR system.
As the region enters a new era of water management and shifting hydrology due to climate change, the Water Forum aims to maintain the integrity of the FMS through appropriate adjustments, ensuring it remains effective and relevant.
Guiding Principles
The FMS will:
1. Be designed to help protect the health and productivity of the LAR resident salmonids (steelhead and chinook) while balancing regional water supply needs and the recreational and esthetic values of the LAR.
2. Provide the following functions for the LAR7:
Primary Functions
a. Support physical habitat availability and favorable water temperatures for the spawning life-cycle stage of chinook and steelhead.
b. Support favorable water temperatures for the rearing life cycle stage of chinook and steelhead.
c. Provide storage protections to minimize the frequency of low storage at Folsom Reservoir, for both water supply and cold-water resources.
Secondary Functions
d. Support physical habitat availability for the rearing life cycle stage of chinook and steelhead.
3. Avoid causing unreasonable impacts to water uses outside of the American River Basin.
7 Updates to the stated FMS functions can be made with confirmation from the Plenary.
Water Forum Agreement 2050
February 2026 35
4. Will not be inconsistent with the applicable flood control objectives and operational guidelines for protecting the Sacramento region downstream of the Folsom and Nimbus dams.
5. Include mechanisms to update and refine FMS features and functions based on changing conditions and the availability of new data and tools.
6. Align with other Water Forum commitments in the driest conditions to ensure that both in-stream and consumptive users share the burden of reduced supplies.
Program Elements
1. Ongoing Monitoring, Tracking, and Reporting
Metrics and indicators for the effectiveness of the FMS will be monitored and tracked for the duration of the agreement (as described in the Science, Monitoring, Decision Support, and Reporting Program Area). Thresholds, or triggers, for actions related to the FMS will be established based on the metrics identified in the Metrics and Reporting section. Performance towards the identified metrics will be reported consistently.
2. Cross-Caucus and Internal Coordination
The Water Forum will schedule regular internal meetings with an inter-caucus group of representatives with knowledge and interest in the real-time flows and operations on the LAR (Cross-Caucus). The frequency of the Cross-Caucus meetings will depend on the needs of the given water year and could range from monthly to weekly (drought years will likely require heightened levels of coordination as compared to wetter years). The purpose of the Cross- Caucus meetings will be for caucus members to coordinate with Water Forum staff to develop a recommended approach to current and forecasted reservoir operations and strategize for regional advocacy. The approach will be informed by the best available and current data, including forecasts, reservoir operations, and flows on the LAR. In their meetings with Reclamation and other regulatory agencies, Water Forum staff will advocate for the position developed by the caucus representatives. An emphasis of the Cross-Caucus will be on guiding implementation of the FMS within the relevant regulatory framework. Regular updates from the Cross-Caucus meetings will be provided at the caucuses, highlighting key issues and strategies identified as relevant to the success of the FMS.
3. External Engagement for Implementation
Reclamation is the principal implementing agency for key features of the FMS (reservoir releases, Folsom storage, temperature management); state and federal resource agencies also have critical roles in the oversight and regulation of Folsom operations. Active relationships with external partners will be necessary for the FMS to be implemented over time. Key partnerships and relationships are outlined below.
Reclamation. The Water Forum will continue to work with managers and operators on seasonal and real-time implementation of the FMS, including participation in regular