Cities Index.
Item 17 - Budgetary Adjustments and Professional Services Agreement for Sacramento River Parkway Project (PDF-52426 KB)

Sacramento City Council
January 4, 2022

Document
Item 17 - Budgetary Adjustments and Professional Services Agreement for Sacramento River Parkway Project (PDF-52426 KB)
Meeting
January 4, 2022
Body
Sacramento City Council
Pages
145
Original file
53.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sacramento.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney Jorge Oseguera, City Auditor Mindy Cuppy, City Clerk Howard Chan, City Manager John Colville, City Treasurer City Council Report
915 I Street, 1st Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2021-00977 January 4, 2022 Consent Item 17
Title: Budgetary Adjustments and Professional Services Agreement for the Sacramento River Parkway Project (K15185000)
Location: District 7
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution: 1) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to increase the revenue and expenditure budgets of the Sacramento River Parkway Project (K15185000) by $1,550,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703); and 2) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. for an amount not to exceed $645,312.

Contact: Megan Johnson, Senior Engineer (916) 808-1967, [email protected]; Jesse Gothan, Supervising Engineer (916) 808-6897, [email protected]; Ofelia Avalos, Engineering Services Manager (916) 808-5054, [email protected], Department of Public Works
Presenter: None
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution
3-Professional Services Agreement

Page 1 of 145 ends

File ID: 2021-00977 Consent Item 17
January 4, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The City has pursued federal funding and dedicated Measure U funds to develop the long-planned Sacramento River Parkway to provide regional access for a trail along the Sacramento River. Currently, the City is proceeding with actions to develop the trail between Garcia Bend Park and Zacharias Park.

In Spring of 2021, the City advertised for professional services to select a consulting firm for preliminary engineering for the project. Staff recommends executing a professional services agreement for preliminary engineering and environmental clearance with Wood Rodgers, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $645,312. The procurement process selected Wood Rodgers, Inc. for both the initial preliminary engineering/environmental clearance phase, and for the subsequent plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) and right of way (ROW) phases.

Following the satisfactory completion of the preliminary engineering and environmental clearances, staff will return to the City Council for approval to move forward with the next phase of work.

Policy Considerations: The actions requested herein are consistent with the City’s goals of improving and expanding public safety, creating walkable communities, and enhancing overall livability. Specific goals the project addresses are as follows:

M 1.2.1 – Multimodal Choices: The City shall develop an integrated, multimodal transportation system that improves the attractiveness of walking, bicycling, and riding transit over time to increase travel choices and aid in achieving a more balanced transportation system and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

M 5.1.14 – Encourage Bicycle Use: The City shall encourage bicycle use in all neighborhoods, especially where short trips are common.

ERC 2.4.2 – Waterway Recreation and Access: The City shall work with regional partners, State agencies, private landowners, and developers to manage, preserve and enhance the Sacramento and American River Parkways and urban waterways and riparian corridors to increase public access for active and passive recreation.

ERC 2.4.3 – Connections to Other Trails: The City shall maintain existing and pursue new connections to local, regional, and State trails.

Economic Impacts: None.

Page 2 of 145 ends

File ID: 2021-00977 Consent Item 17
January 4, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento
Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The requested action would approve budgeting and a professional services agreement for the Sacramento River Parkway project. The action is an administrative activity that would not result in a direct or indirect significant effect on the environment and is exempt from CEQA review. CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5); 15060(c)(3).

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The project has been awarded federal funding, and accordingly, appropriate NEPA clearance will take place as part of project development.

Sustainability: The project is consistent with sustainability goals of promoting walking by developing a universally accessible, safe, convenient, integrated, and wellconnected pedestrian system.

Commission/Committee Action: None.

Rationale for Recommendation: In order to advance development of the Sacramento River Parkway trail, the first steps are preliminary engineering and environmental clearance.

Professional assistance is needed to carry out these tasks.

On April 7, 2021, the Department of Public Works advertised a Request for Proposals for services. The scope of services included the preliminary engineering, environmental documentation as part of an initial agreement, and upon satisfactory performance, the final design and right of way services as a supplemental agreement. Three firms responded:
• Wood Rodgers, Inc.
• ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.
• Tetra Tech
A panel of City staff from the Department of Public Works reviewed and evaluated the consultant teams’ written proposals based upon experience, qualifications, project understanding, and work plan among other factors. Two teams were asked to interview:

Wood Rodgers, Inc. and ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. Based on the interview and proposal, Wood Rodgers, Inc. was recommended as the top ranked firm.

City Council action is required to appropriate funding and to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc.

Page 3 of 145 ends

File ID: 2021-00977 Consent Item 17
January 4, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento
Financial Considerations: The estimated cost to complete environmental clearance and final design for the full project limits, and right-of-way and construction for Segment 1 is approximately $6.7 million. With the approval of $1,550,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703), there will be sufficient funding to award the professional services agreement for environmental clearance and final design to Wood Rodgers, Inc. for a not-to-exceed amount of $645,312. Additional federal funding will be needed to fully fund construction.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): This is a federally funded project, therefore the City’s LBE requirements are held in abeyance. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) federal policy applies. Wood Rodgers, Inc. pledged to exceed the 16% DBE goal for this project.

Background: In 1975, the Sacramento City Council took the first formal action to recognize recreational use along the Sacramento Riverfront by adopting a Feasibility Study and Sacramento River Parkway Master Plan (1975 Plan). The 1975 Plan introduced the concept of developing public access recreation along the Sacramento River, coupled with natural resource protection and enhancement.

In 1997, an update to the Sacramento River Parkway Plan was adopted by passage of Resolutions 1997-590 through -594, which included actions to update the Bicycle Master Plan (BMP) to include the proposed off-street multi-use trail along the Sacramento River. These were approved in subsequent BMP plan updates.

In 2012, the Delta Protection Commission requested the parkway be incorporated into the Great California Delta Trail to establish a continuous recreation corridor, including bicycle and hiking trails, around the Delta. The City Council adopted Resolution 2012-168 and incorporated the parkway as part of the Great California Delta Trail.

In July 2017, the Sacramento River Parkway Phase 1 (K15185000) CIP was established to review the prior documentation and initiate preliminary engineering activities. The total project limits are on the levee of the Sacramento River, between Garcia Bend Park and Zacharias Park. For the purpose of programming grant funds, the project was divided into two segments:
(1) between Garcia Bend Park and Arabella Way, and (2) between Arabella Way and Zacharias Park.

In early 2021, the City applied for federal funding from the regional allocation programmed by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG). SACOG partially funded the request and provided funding to complete preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E). Future federal funding will need to be pursued to complete right of way and construction phases.

Page 4 of 145 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE SACRAMENTO RIVER PARKWAY PROJECT (K15185000)

BACKGROUND
A. The proposed Sacramento River Parkway Project (K15185000) includes the construction of a levee-top multi-use trail adjacent to the Sacramento River, to close a gap in the trail network between Garcia Bend Park and Zacharias Park.

B. The project was awarded federal grant funding to perform preliminary engineering and environmental clearance, and to prepare Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E). These funds have been authorized for use by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

C. Per Caltrans procedures for state and federally funded procurements, a solicitation for professional consulting services to complete the preliminary engineering and the included tasks was advertised. Through a competitive qualifications-based selection process, staff determined Wood Rodgers, Inc. was the most qualified consulting firm and recommends entering into a Professional Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee is authorized to increase the revenue and expenditure budgets of the Sacramento River Parkway Project (K15185000) by $1,550,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703).

Section 2. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee is authorized to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc for an amount not to exceed $645,312.

Page 5 of 145 ends
Page 6 of 145 ends
Page 7 of 145 ends
Page 8 of 145 ends
Page 9 of 145 ends
Page 10 of 145 ends
Page 11 of 145 ends
Page 12 of 145 ends
Page 13 of 145 ends
Page 14 of 145 ends
Page 15 of 145 ends
Page 16 of 145 ends
Page 17 of 145 ends
Page 18 of 145 ends
Page 19 of 145 ends
Page 20 of 145 ends
Page 21 of 145 ends
Page 22 of 145 ends
Page 23 of 145 ends
Page 24 of 145 ends
Page 25 of 145 ends
Page 26 of 145 ends
Page 27 of 145 ends
Page 28 of 145 ends
Page 29 of 145 ends
Page 30 of 145 ends
Page 31 of 145 ends
Page 32 of 145 ends
Page 33 of 145 ends
Page 34 of 145 ends
Page 35 of 145 ends
Page 36 of 145 ends
Page 37 of 145 ends
Page 38 of 145 ends
Page 39 of 145 ends
Page 40 of 145 ends
Page 41 of 145 ends
Page 42 of 145 ends
Page 43 of 145 ends
Page 44 of 145 ends
Page 45 of 145 ends
Page 46 of 145 ends
Page 47 of 145 ends
Page 48 of 145 ends
Page 49 of 145 ends
Page 50 of 145 ends
Page 51 of 145 ends
Page 52 of 145 ends
Page 53 of 145 ends
Page 54 of 145 ends
Page 55 of 145 ends
Page 56 of 145 ends
Page 57 of 145 ends
Page 58 of 145 ends
Page 59 of 145 ends
Page 60 of 145 ends
Page 61 of 145 ends
Page 62 of 145 ends
Page 63 of 145 ends
Page 64 of 145 ends
Page 65 of 145 ends
Page 66 of 145 ends
Page 67 of 145 ends
Page 68 of 145 ends
Page 69 of 145 ends
Page 70 of 145 ends
Page 71 of 145 ends
Page 72 of 145 ends
Page 73 of 145 ends
Page 74 of 145 ends
Page 75 of 145 ends
Page 76 of 145 ends
Page 77 of 145 ends
Page 78 of 145 ends
Page 79 of 145 ends
Page 80 of 145 ends
Page 81 of 145 ends
Page 82 of 145 ends
Page 83 of 145 ends
Page 84 of 145 ends
Page 85 of 145 ends
Page 86 of 145 ends
Page 87 of 145 ends
Page 88 of 145 ends
Page 89 of 145 ends
Page 90 of 145 ends
Page 91 of 145 ends
Page 92 of 145 ends
Page 93 of 145 ends
Page 94 of 145 ends
Page 95 of 145 ends
Page 96 of 145 ends
Page 97 of 145 ends
Page 98 of 145 ends
Page 99 of 145 ends
Page 100 of 145 ends
Page 101 of 145 ends
Page 102 of 145 ends
Page 103 of 145 ends
Page 104 of 145 ends
Page 105 of 145 ends
Page 106 of 145 ends
Page 107 of 145 ends
Page 108 of 145 ends
Page 109 of 145 ends
Page 110 of 145 ends
Page 111 of 145 ends
Page 112 of 145 ends
Page 113 of 145 ends
Page 114 of 145 ends
Page 115 of 145 ends
Page 116 of 145 ends
Page 117 of 145 ends
Page 118 of 145 ends
Page 119 of 145 ends
Page 120 of 145 ends
Page 121 of 145 ends
Page 122 of 145 ends
Page 123 of 145 ends
Page 124 of 145 ends
Page 125 of 145 ends
Page 126 of 145 ends
Page 127 of 145 ends
Page 128 of 145 ends
Page 129 of 145 ends
Page 130 of 145 ends
Page 131 of 145 ends
Page 132 of 145 ends
Page 133 of 145 ends
Page 134 of 145 ends
Page 135 of 145 ends
Page 136 of 145 ends
Page 137 of 145 ends
Page 138 of 145 ends
Page 139 of 145 ends
Page 140 of 145 ends
Page 141 of 145 ends
Page 142 of 145 ends
Page 143 of 145 ends
Page 144 of 145 ends
Page 145 of 145 ends
← All documents from this meeting