Sacramento City Council
March 22, 2022

Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney Jorge Oseguera, City Auditor Mindy Cuppy, City Clerk Howard Chan, City Manager John Colville, City Treasurer City Council Report
915 I Street, 1st Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org

File ID: 2022-00287 March 22, 2022 Consent Item 12

Title: Budgetary Adjustments and Professional Services Agreement for the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100)

Location: District 4, Capitol Mall

Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution: 1) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to increase the revenue and expenditure budget of the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100) by $450,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703); 2) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to transfer $70,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the expenditure budget in the State and Federal Grant Match Program (T15007200) to the expenditure budget in the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100) and; 3) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Arup US, Inc for an amount not to exceed $635,952 for the completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance.

Contact: Megan Johnson, Senior Engineer, (916) 808-1967, [email protected]
; Jesse Gothan, Supervising Engineer, (916) 808-6897,
[email protected]; Ofelia Avalos, Engineering Services Manager, (916) 808-5054, [email protected]; Department of Public Works

Presenter: None

Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution
3-Professional Services Agreement

File ID: 2022-00287 Consent Item 12
March 22, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento

Description/Analysis

Issue Detail: In December 2016, the City Council established a Capital Improvement Project for the Capitol Mall Revitalization (T15175100), and appropriated and transferred funds for preliminary concept development, stakeholder engagement and concept report for improvements between 3rd Street and 9th Street.

In 2018, the City Council authorized the Department of Public Works to submit a grant application as part of the Sacramento Area Council of Government’s (SACOG’s) allocation of regional federal funds, and SACOG programmed the City $500,000 for preliminary engineering and environmental clearance.

In November 2020, a solicitation for professional services was advertised to competitively select a consulting firm to provide preliminary design, public and stakeholder outreach, and environmental services. The panel was comprised of City staff representing transportation planning, urban design, and engineering services, economic development, and a representative from CADA. The City received ten proposals, and the review panel recommended the top three teams to interview. Based on the total scores and the strengths of the teams, the selection panel unanimously selected Arup US, Inc. as the top ranked team.

Since the consultant selection, City staff and the consultant team have reviewed scope and budget elements and refined the scope to reflect an efficient and streamlined delivery approach for the preliminary design and environmental clearance.

Staff recommends executing a professional services agreement for preparation of the preliminary design and environmental clearance to Arup US, Inc.

Policy Considerations: The actions requested herein are consistent with the City’s policies for land use and mobility in the Central City, as identified in the Central City Specific Plan:

LU.3 – Public Realm: Establish healthy and inviting streetscapes and civic spaces that inspire walking, biking, and social interaction.

LU.4 – Urban Design: Reinforce the Central City as a distinct, attractive, and memorable urban place.

LU.7.5 – Public Gathering Places: Encourage more public gathering places along the corridors, such as plazas and courtyards that can accommodate events.

File ID: 2022-00287 Consent Item 12
March 22, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento

LU.7.7 – Public Art: Promote public art as a way to enhance the look, feel, and character of the corridors.

The CCSP also identified specific land use policies for Capitol Mall, recognizing its importance to the city identity:

LU.6.6 – Visual Identity: Enhance the visual identity, landscaping, orientation of development and unique gateway status of Capitol Mall.

LU.6.7. – Community Engagement: Engage the community to reimage the underused public spaces along Capitol Mall and create comfortable and inviting gathering places for active arts, festivals, and other events.

LU.6.8 – Multi-Modal Mobility: Improve multi-modal mobility connections to and from Capitol Mall, as well as to the Sacramento River

LU.6.9 – Funding Coordination: Continue to coordinate with the State and other agencies to pursue funding sources to implement improvements to Capitol Mall.

Economic Impacts: None

Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The requested action would approve budgeting and a professional services agreement for the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project. The action is an administrative activity that would not result in a direct or indirect significant effect on the environment and is exempt from CEQA review. CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5); 15060(c)(3). Appropriate CEQA review will be incorporated as part of the project review.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The project has been awarded federal funding, and accordingly, appropriate NEPA reviews are part of project development.

The California Department of Transportation is the NEPA lead agency.

Sustainability: The project is consistent with sustainability goals of promoting walking by developing a universally accessible, safe, convenient, integrated, and well-connected pedestrian system.

Commission/Committee Action: None

File ID: 2022-00287 Consent Item 12
March 22, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento

Rationale for Recommendation: The Department of Public Works advertised a Request for Proposals for the competitive selection of a consultant firm. The scope of services included the preliminary engineering and urban design, public and stakeholder engagement, and environmental clearance. Ten firms responded:

AECOM Design Workshop
Toole Design Gensler
PAU Jacobs
Marvel Arup US, Inc
WRT SWA Group

The panel of reviewers were comprised of City staff representing transportation planning, urban design, engineering services, economic development, and a representative from the Capitol Area Development Authority (CADA.), The panel reviewed and evaluated the consultant teams’ written proposals based upon experience, qualifications, project understanding, and work plan among other factors. Three teams were asked to interview:

Design Workshop, Toole Design, and Arup US, Inc. Based on the interview and proposal, Arup US, Inc. was recommended as the top ranked firm.

City Council action is required to complete the budgetary adjustments and to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Arup US, Inc.

Financial Considerations: The estimated project cost to complete preliminary engineering , public and stakeholder engagement, and environmental clearance is $920,000. CADA has agreed to contribute $100,000 for the preliminary design and environmental clearance, and a Memorandum of Understanding has been executed for that funding. With the approval of $450,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703) and the transfer of $70,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the State and Federal Grant Match Program (T15007200), there will be sufficient funding to execute the professional services agreement for environmental clearance and final design to Arup US, Inc for a not-to-exceed amount of $635,952 and complete the preliminary engineering phase and the environmental clearance.

At this time, there is no funding programmed for construction of the project.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): This is a federally funded project, therefore the City’s LBE policy is held in abeyance. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) federal policy applies.

Arup US, Inc pledged to exceed the DBE goal for this project.

File ID: 2022-00287 Consent Item 12
March 22, 2022
powered by Legistar™
City of Sacramento

Background The Central City Specific Plan included policies to improve Capitol Mall into a meaningful public space, recognizing its importance to city identity and it’s potential to be an activated link connecting key destinations in downtown and to the State Capitol building and grounds.

The Department of Public Works prepared a Feasibility Study for a reconfiguration of the public right of way on Capitol Mall, between 3rd Street and 9th Street. The goals of the reconfiguration of Capitol Mall are to better support day-to-day pedestrian and bicyclist activity, to support smaller-scale activation, to better support large events and civic demonstrations, and to create a vibrant public space connecting key Sacramento destinations (such as the Golden 1 Center, the Capitol Building, the Crocker Art Museum, and the Waterfront) which reflects the priority of Sacramento’s values and influence on the state and the nation.

The Feasibility Study established an initial preference for a roadway alignment and lane reduction and identified opportunities and constraints. The preferred alignment that emerged through the process was to eliminate the wide median and bring the roadway segments together in the middle of the road, which – combined with the lane reduction – will reduce the overall crossing distance for pedestrians and improve walkability. This will also allow for an expanded pedestrian realm that can support activation.

The ultimate project is also anticipated to include landscaping and tree planting, new signals, pedestrian-scale lighting and amenities, and to include flexible plaza space for events, placemaking, public art, farmers’ markets, and other public uses.

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENTS AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE CAPITOL MALL REVITALIZATION PROJECT (T15175100)

BACKGROUND

A. The Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100) proposes to reallocate the public right of way on Capitol Mall to prioritize pedestrian and bicyclists uses, and support events and day-to-day activation.

B. The project was awarded federal grant funding to perform preliminary engineering and environmental clearance. These funds have been authorized for use by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

C. Per Caltrans procedures for procurements, a solicitation for professional consulting services to complete the preliminary engineering and the included tasks was advertised. Through a competitive qualifications-based selection process, staff determined Arup US. Inc as the highest ranked consulting firm and recommends entering into a Professional Services Agreement with Arup US, Inc.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee is authorized to increase the revenue and expenditure budget of the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100) by $450,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703).

Section 2. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee is authorized to transfer $70,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the expenditure budget in the State and Federal Grant Match Program (T15007200) to the expenditure budget in the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project (T15175100).

Section 3. The City Manager or the City Manager’s designee is authorized to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Arup US, Inc for an amount not to exceed $635,952.

Form Approved by City Attorney 9‐1‐2020  Page 1
CONTRACT #:

CONTRACT NAME:  Capitol Mall Revitalization
CONTRACT PROJECT #: T15175100
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
DIVISION:  Engineering Services
CITY OF SACRAMENTO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,
ENGINEERS, AND LAND SURVEYORS

THIS CONTRACT is made at Sacramento, California, by and between the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a charter city and municipal corporation (“CITY”), and

Arup US, Inc.
1330 Broadway, 13th Floor, Oakland, CA  94612
Phone: 415.963.3893 / E‐mail: [email protected]

(“CONTRACTOR”), as of the Effective Date, as defined below.

The City and Contractor agree as follows:

1. Effective Date.   This Contract shall be effective beginning  March 22, 2022.

2. Contract Documents.   All exhibits and documents attached or referred to in this Contract are incorporated as if set forth herein, Including Exhibit A (titl ed “Scope of Services”) and Exhibit B (titled “Payment”).

If there is a conflict between the terms and conditions of any document prepared or provided by the Contractor and made a part of this Contract and the other terms or conditions of the Contract, the other terms and con
ditions  of the Contract control.

3.          Services.  Subject  to  the  terms  and  conditions  set  forth  in  this  Contract,  CONTRACTOR  shall provide to CITY the services described in Exhibit A (“Services”).

CONTRACTOR will not be compensated for services outside the scope of Exhibit A (“Additional Services”) unless, before providing Additional Se
rvices: (a) CONTRACTOR notifies CITY and CITY
agrees that the Additional Services are outside the scope of Exhibit A; (b) CONTRACTOR estimates the additional compensation required for these Additional Services; and (c) CITY, after notice, approves in writing a Supplemental Contract specifying the Additional Services and the amount of additional comp ensation  to be paid Contractor.

CITY  will  have  no  obligations  whatsoever  under  this  Contract  or  any  Supplemental  Contract, unless and until this Contract or any Supplemental Contract is approved by the City as required by the Sacramento City Code. As used in this Contract, the term “Services” includes both Services and Additional Services as applicable.

Form Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Page 2

4. Pay
ment. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B.

CONTRACTOR shall submit all invoices to CITY in the manner specified in Exhibit B.

5. Fa
cilities and Equipment. Except as set forth below, CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment required for CONTRACTOR to perform this Contract.

CITY shall furnish to CONTRACTOR only the facilities and equipment listed below, if any.

6. Insur
ance. Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain the insurance coverage described in the attached Exhibit C.

7. Gene
ral Conditions . Contractor shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit D.

8. Addi
tional Requirements for Surveying, Material Testing, and Inspection Services. If this Contract includes any land surveying, material testing, or inspection services provided for a City construction project, during the design, pre-construction, construction, or post- construction phases of the project, the Contractor and any subcontractor or subconsultant performing any such services shall comply with the provisions specified in Exhibit E.

9. Non-D
iscrimination in Employee Benefits. This Contract may be subject to Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54, Non- Discrimination in Employee Benefits by City Contractors. A summary of the requirements, entitled "Requirements of the Non-Discrimination in Employee Benefits Code (Equal Benefits Ordinance),” can be viewed at:
https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

Co
ntractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands the requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance.

Co
ntractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

10. C
onsidering Criminal Conviction Information in the Employment Application Process. This Contract may be subject to the requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62, Procedures for Considering Criminal Conviction Information in the Employment Application Process . A summary of the requirements, entitled “Ban-The-Box Requirements,” can be viewed at:
https:/
/www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

The Ban-T
he-Box Requirements are applicable to certain contracts with the City in an amount of $250,000 or more (either initial value or total value after amendment) or if the total value of all Contractor's contracts with the City is $250,000 or more over a 12-month period.

Form Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Page 3
Contractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands these requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance. Contractor shall require applicable subcontractors to fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62 and include these requirements in all subcontracts covered by Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62.

Contractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

11. Loca
l Business Enterprise Program. The Local Business Enterprise Program Participation Requirements ("LBE Participation Requirements") may be applicable to this Contract. A summary of the requirements, entitled "LBE Participation Requirements," can be viewed at:
https:/
/www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

Co
ntractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands these requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.60. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance. Contractor shall require applicable subcontractors to fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.60 and include these requirements in all subcontracts covered by Sacramento City Code chapter 3.60.

Co
ntractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.60 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

12. Autho
rity. The person signing this Contract for CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that he or she has read, understands, and agrees to all the Contract terms and is fully authorized to sign this Contract on behalf of the CONTRACTOR and to bind the CONTRACTOR to the performance of the Contract’s obligations.
[Sig
nature Pages Follow Exhibits]

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit A - Page 1

EXHIBIT A
SCO

PE OF SERVICES

1. Repr
esentatives.

The
CITY Representative for this Agreement is:

Meg
an Johnson / Project Manager
915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.808.1967 / E-mail: [email protected] The
CONTRACTOR Representative for this Agreement is:

Da
hlia Chazan / Project Manager
1330 Broadway, 13th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: 415.963.3893 / E-mail: [email protected]
Unl
ess otherwise provided in this Contract, a ll Contractor questions and correspondence pertaining to this Contract must be addressed to the City Representative. All City questions and correspondence must be addressed to the Contractor Representative.

2. Scope of
Services. Contractor shall provide Services to City as set forth in Attachment 1 to this Exhibit A.

3. Time of Performance. The S ervices described in this Contract shall be provided for through December 31, 2023. Contractor shall provide the Services in accordance with any schedule in Attachment 1 to this Exhibit A . Contractor shall immediately notify the City if Contractor is unable to make delivery of Goods or perform Services in compliance with this Contract.

4. Co
nflict of Interest Requirements. The individual(s) who will provide Services pursuant to this Contract are “Consultants” within the meaning of the Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code: ____ yes __X__ no [check one] Contractor shall cause the following to occur within 30 days after execution of this Contract:
(A) Identify the individuals who will provide Services or perform Work under this Contract as "Consultants"; and
(B) Cause these individuals to file with the City Representative the "assuming office" statements of economic interests required by the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

Thereafter, throughout the term of the Contract, Contractor shall cause these individuals to file with the City Representative annual statements of economic interests and "leaving office" statements of economic interests, as required by the City's Conflict of Interest Code. The City may withhold all or a portion of any payment due under this Contract or impose fines on the individuals until all required statements are filed.

25 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 In order to manage a tight schedule and deliver a
world-class design for Capitol Mall we have split our
scope into phases. Phase 1 completes sufficient design
work to support environmental clearance, allowing
us to meet the State-mandated timeline for the
proposed CEQA exemption, and establishes a basis
for more extensive design thinking and community
engagement to be completed in optional Phase 2.

This phase is focused on developing a physical
foundation for project success and setting clear goals
for urban design, activation, implementation, and
ecology strategies that will bring the project to life.

In the next phase, we would expect to spend more
time working with the community to flesh out those
goals and how they can be implemented, within
the framework of the physical design that will be
environmentally cleared in Phase 1.

1. Project Management

1.1 Meetings
We will set-up and facilitate Project Development
Team (PDT) meetings, interagency meetings, field
reviews, and other project related meetings. The
consultant shall prepare meeting agendas, meeting
minutes, necessary supplemental materials, and
meeting sign-in sheets.

We anticipate attending regular coordination meetings
with the City throughout the duration of the project.

We anticipate attending the following meetings:

1. Bi-weekly design coordination meetings with City
staff (29 total including 9 during environmental
clearance)

2. Field review / site visit with Caltrans, City staff
and the project team

3. Meetings with transit operators and utility
providers (4 total)
Communication with the City
We propose implementing a two-part working
relationship diagram similar that has successfully
delivered numerous other projects. At the outset,
communication will be emphasized between our
leadership team (comprising our Project Director,
Dahlia Chazan, and Project Manager, Grant McInnes),

5.0 Scope of Work
and the DPW’s Project Manager, Megan Johnson,
to align goals, objectives and expectations. As work
progresses, the Project Manager will facilitate a
direct communication relationship between team
members and City staff, while tracking and regularly
reporting progress. We believe this protocol balances
contractual responsibility and consistency for DPW
with work efficiency and relationship development.

We propose the following management approach to
deliver on time and within budget:

1. Dahlia and Grant will meet with DPW to review
the project scope and align goals, objectives and
expectations. Successful project management
begins by agreeing a thorough and feasible Scope
of Work that clearly outlines the project schedule,
responsibilities, and assumptions.

2. We will host a kick-off meeting with the City
and key team members to review the scope and
schedule and assign individual tasks.

3. Grant will monitor the quality and progress of the
work with regular meetings or conference calls
with the City to review of work in progress.

4. Grant will take action as necessary to maintain
quality and progress.

5. Grant will communicate progress and results to
DPW at regularly scheduled progress meetings.

We will maintain an issues log, to track items
requiring City input. We will to review the log
during the progress meetings, which will enable

26 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 current issues requiring input or resolution to be
discussed in a timely manner.

6. Grant will coordinate with the City’s Project
Manager on a day-to-day basis to deal with issues
as they arise.

7. Should the City have urgent issues that require
discussion, Dahlia and Grant commit to being
immediately available to agree a way forward.

1. 2 Monthly Status Reports
We will prepare monthly status reports and project
schedule updates, to be submitted with our invoices.

The status reports will outline the activities being
invoiced for each firm. We will prepare a draft status
report and submit it for approval of the format prior to submitting the first invoice.

1. 3 Schedule and Work Plan
We will work with the City’s Project Manager to
agree the project schedule and Scope of Work to be
incorporated in our Agreement. These will document
the work program and detail task descriptions,
deliverables, budgets, project milestones, planned
deliverable dates and meeting schedules.

We will implement a Critical Path approach to project
delivery. Startup activities include developing the
refined work plan and budget, affirming the project
goals, objectives, and study area, and public outreach
process.

1. 4 Management and Coordination
We will manage our contracts with the City and the
sub-consultant team. We will coordinate the team’s
activities and oversee scope, budget and schedule
using the following quality and cost management
protocols.

Quality Management
We will implement Quality Assurance/Quality
Control using Arup’s Management System (AMS).

AMS exists to ensure that our output conforms to
our client’s requirements, as well as our internal
requirements. We are certified to the requirements
of ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 by Bureau
Veritas. Our AMS procedures are fully integrated
into our working methods, assuring high quality
outputs. Key aspects of our AMS system include
project planning, document management, change
management, project reviews / checking, and output
verification.

Our methods for continued quality control include
formal design reviews and a continuous critical
assessment approach during the day to day work
process. Our internal reviews are generally held in an
informal atmosphere to encourage ideas and positive
criticism and are recorded so that the Project Manager
follows up any actions. Design reviews are held at pre- arranged milestones to provide an independent quality
control overview. Deliverables will be checked by a
team of independent checkers prior to issue to the City.

The quality assurance procedures for projects under
this contract will include preparation of a Project
Plan (PP) which identifies project schedule, design
goals, standards and required approvals. The Plan
acts as a ‘checks and balances’ tool by clarifying the
communication procedures and identifying milestone
deliverables needed to achieve the necessary level
of service. Grant McInnes will be responsible for
preparing the Plan and maintaining it through the life
of the project as a living document. This provides a
record of changing constraints on the project from
project inception to completed construction.

Cost Management
Grant has extensive experience managing large,
multi-disciplinary professional teams. He will
manage the team to complete the work on time and
within budget through detailed planning, appropriate
staffing, and monitoring of the activities of the various team members. Progress will be tracked on a weekly
basis so that potential problems can be identified and
corrected in a timely manner and before they can
affect our overall performance of the work.

Every individual working on the project will be
required to fill out weekly timesheets that are
forwarded to Grant by Monday for hours worked the
previous week. Project hours will then be entered into
a resource-loaded schedule and accounting system for
budget tracking.

Grant will hold regular meetings and/or conference
calls with supporting staff as appropriate to monitor
progress and take corrective action, if necessary.

This project monitoring approach will allow us to
be aware of schedule and cost variances as they are
developing. Grant will assess reasons or causes for the

27 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 variance(s) and make necessary modifications with
the project team. If situations arise that are materially different from those expected, we would discuss
this with DPW’s Project Manager within one to two
days of identifying the problem, review options for
handling the unexpected conditions by shifting efforts
from other subtasks if appropriate, and work out an
appropriate adjustment in scope, schedule, and/or cost
to handle the unexpected conditions.

Costs will be forecast and monitored using Arup’s
financial reporting and forecasting tools. Grant will
work with our Commercial Management team to
monitor spending and budgets on a weekly basis.

Deliverables

1. Summary memo that clearly articulates the project
goals and objectives in an accessible form that can
made available to stakeholders

2. A work plan that identifies detailed tasks and
deliverables

3. Project schedule, that identifies the project’s
Critical Path through refinement of the project
work plan and budget

4. Meeting minutes
2 Document Review and Data
Collection

2. 1 Document Review and Data Collection
We will obtain and review information on existing
conditions, design standards, regulatory requirements
and unique constraints or opportunities. We will
coordinate with City staff to seek information on
existing infrastructure and design standards and to
confirm engineering input and drawings required to
support the project submissions.

Information sought may be in the form of as-built,
GIS data, or reports, and will comprise available
right-of-way information, the Central City Specific
Plan, the Golden 1 Transportation Management
Plan, and environmental documents and planning
documents for adjacent projects. In addition to data
received from the City and DPW, we will use publicly
available datasets such as City and County Open Data
portals, crash databases (SWITRS or TIMS), and
USGS, as well as equity-focused datasets including
CDC’s Social Vulnerability Index, the National
Equity Atlas, and historical redlining maps.

Review Existing Environmental Documentation
We will review the existing environmental documents
and studies that are relevant to the proposed project
and the project area. Documents that will be reviewed
and referenced will comprise the following:

1. Central City Specific Plan EIR

2. Sacramento 2035 General Plan EIR

3. California Register of Historical Resources
Evaluation of the Capitol Mall

4. Jesse M. Unruh Building Renovation Project EIR
and associated cultural resource reports

5. Capitol Annex Project EIR and associated cultural
resource reports

6. Capitol Mall State Buildings Historic District
Evaluation
Prepare Preliminary Environmental Study Form
We will prepare an abbreviated description of
the project suitable for use in the Preliminary
Environmental Analysis (PES) form. We will use
suitably scaled exhibits as figures to accompany
the description. We will collect relevant data from
existing environmental documents and searches of

28 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 online databases (e.g., databases with occurrences of
biological resources or locations of known hazardous
materials sites).

We will prepare a draft PES form based on the
information collected to support the project design.

The draft PES form will be used to coordinate with
Caltrans and confirm the technical studies required.

Attached to the form will be a GeoTracker map
printout, federal species lists, FEMA FIRMette map,
VIA questionnaire, project location map, and project
footprint map and available engineering drawings.

2.2 Base Mapping and Survey
Survey
To support preliminary design and future construction
efforts, we will provide preliminary land surveying
services that comprise a review of existing records,
horizontal and vertical control, drone mobilization
and imagery. We will coordinate with the City to
obtain the necessary documentation, traffic control
and encroachment permitting.

We will work with City staff to identify the approved
project control for the preliminary design and future
phases of the project. We assume that the horizontal
control will be based on The City of Sacramento
Control Network, North American Datum (NAD83),
California State Plane Coordinate System Zone 2 and
North American Vertical Datum (NA VD88).

Fully resolved Boundary and Right of Way surveys
may be necessary in future phases of the project.

To provide confidence in the accuracy of our
preliminary design, we will collaborate with the
City to incorporate GIS boundary and right of way
lines into the base map. We will locate and survey
major boundary monuments within the project area
and will best fit the provided GIS Right of Way line
work into the surveyed monuments. We will create
an AutoCAD file that includes the boundary and right
of way base mapping along with the relevant control
monuments.

We will mobilize a survey quality drone capable
of hi-resolution (0.5 – 0.8 in/px) color imagery and
ortho-rectification. The image will be scaled and fit to the primary control and cover an approximately 200’
wide strip along the project corridor.

Base mapping
Our geospatial team will develop a base map that
incorporates technical features with other contextual
information, to provide the design, environmental,
and engineering teams with the data needed to inform
decisions throughout the project. We will use standard
GIS formats and tools to ensure interoperability and
can deliver the City a Geodatabase package at the end
of the project including all project data.

Our geospatial work must consider the need to use
maps for outreach and communication of ideas, and
we will take this into account when selecting the
format for deliverables. Where possible, we will bring
these to the virtual space so they will have utility
for other phases of the project and be accessible to a
broader audience.

Deliverables

1. AutoCAD file that includes scaled imagery
aligned to the boundary and right of way base
mapping

2. Base map in GIS and .pdf formats

2.3 Review “The Promenade” Concept
We will scrutinize “The Promenade” Concept Plan
from both urban design and transport planning
perspectives to identify potential opportunities for
improvement. The urban design review will focus on
validating whether the “The Promenade” Concept
Plan is supporting the creation of high-quality public
spaces, while the transportation review will focus on
its support of multi-modal transportation throughout
the project area.

We will begin our review by compiling the client and
stakeholder comments on The Promenade concept
design to understand the concept big wins, recent
key developments, and concerns. We will confirm
the metrics of success and confirm how and why
the Promenade Concept is the preferred direction as
compared to previous alternatives. We will compile
the comments to synthesize current understanding
and make visual through a summary matrix to
understand the quantitative impacts and/or word
clouds to understand the qualitative impacts.

We will take the current plan and overlay into a 3D
model and diagram the “before and after” visual
implications of the design.

29 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 This task will commence immediately upon Notice
to Proceed. Preliminary recommendations arising
from this study period will be discussed with the City, and significant augmentations / amendments to the
Concept Plan that appeal to the City will be discussed
at the first public outreach meeting.

2.4 Constraints Analysis of Cultural and Historic
Resources
Review and Assess Effects Related to Cultural and
Historic Resources, on Design Development, and
Prepare Initial Cultural Studies
The environmental team will support the design of
project alternatives that minimize effects on cultural and historical resources by conducting the following review and assessment.

We will conduct a records search at the California
Historical Resources Information System’s North
Central Information Center located at Sacramento State
University for previously conducted cultural resources
studies and previously recorded resources that may occur within or adjacent to the project limits.

We will contact the California Native American
Heritage Commission with a request for a search of
their Sacred Lands files and contact information for
local Native American representatives. We will send
letters to Native American representatives with a request for any information they may have regarding cultural
resources in the project area vicinity. Historic map
research will determine sensitivity for buried historic- era archaeological resources within the project area. We will consult with local museums, historical societies,
and other historic preservation interest groups to
request information regarding the types—and potential
historical significance—of historical resources in the
project limits.

We will list and map the historic properties and other
sites in the project area including up to six overlapping established historic districts with varying layers of
historic landmark status at city, state, and federal levels.

We will identify and confirm the unique character-
defining features that each district possesses (e.g.,
building design, setting, circulation patterns, viewsheds) that have been determined to convey and define what
makes these properties historically significant and use the character-defining features to analyze potential
project effects on the historic districts.

The design team will use the analysis to inform project alternatives that minimize the effects on historic districts.

We see an opportunity to shorten the project schedule
by preparing the following cultural studies concurrently with the Preliminary Urban Design:

1. Area of Potential Effects (APE) map based on the
limits of the project concepts being considered

2. Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR),
Archaeological Survey Report (ASR), and

3. Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER).

We will prepare up to two APE map iterations
prior to map approval. In the ASR, we will include
environmental and cultural contexts, figures, methods,
and results of the study. We will document the assumed
outcome of no archaeological resources. In the HPSR
and HRER, we will document the previously evaluated
resources in the APE, and resources presumed eligible
for listing in the NRHP for the purposes of this project only. In the HRER, we will document outreach and
consultation with historic preservation interest groups.

2.5 Data Collection Summary Memorandum
We will prepare a brief memorandum that summarizes
our findings regarding existing conditions, and
anticipated design requirements, objectives,
opportunities and constraints If appropriate, the
memorandum will include a simple graphic with the
location of important environmental features.

Receivables
We assume that we will receive the following
information upon Notice to Proceed:

1. The existing aerial provided to the Feasibility Study team

2. Record drawings of the existing streets and utilities as available

3. Existing topographic and utility surveys in digital
format, as available

4. Existing drainage and sewer reports for the project
area and immediate surrounds as available

5. Geotechnical reports for the project area and/or
immediate surrounds as available
Deliverables

1. Data Collection Summary Memorandum

30 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

2. A list of additional questions and data needs for
submittal to the City

3. Updated Concept Plan, with a brief summary memo
summarizing the benefits of suggested changes

4. Base map of the existing conditions

5. Abbreviated Project Description

6. Draft and final APE map

7. Draft Preliminary Environmental Study form [MS
Word + attachments]

8. Administrative Draft (local agency review), Draft
(Caltrans 1st review), Revised Draft (Caltrans 2nd
review), and Approved HPSR package

31 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

3. Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3. 1 Outreach Management and Coordination
We will provide strategic advice and counsel, review
project materials and reports, coordinate with the City and project team, and monitor team communications
throughout the project.

3. 2 Public Awareness and Notification
In coordination with the City’s Public Information
Office (PIO), we will develop communication
materials and a project promotion plan to build
awareness among key stakeholder groups and the
community-at-large about the project and community
engagement touchpoints. This awareness campaign
will include traditional media relations, social media, and community partnerships to leverage existing
communications links among numerous stakeholder
groups and targeted audiences.

We will develop content for and publish a project
webpage for the Capitol Mall Revitalization Project,
to be hosted on the City’s website. The webpage will
provide community members with the opportunity
to access project information, FAQ’s, maps and
exhibits, a schedule, and a space to provide their
contact information to receive electronic project
updates. We will create, develop content for, and
update the webpage throughout the process; we will
use the City’s Sitecore web system to create pages,
upload content, documents, and graphics, and publish
updates. We will update the webpage with accurate and
timely information to notify community members of
important project information.

3.3 Stakeholder Identification and Database
Development
There are many key stakeholder groups who will
need to be engaged to ensure the success of the
development and implementation of the project. These
key stakeholder groups include elected officials and
staff from both the City of Sacramento and the State,
property and business owners such as the Downtown
Sacramento Partnership, the Capital Area Development
Authority, event organizers, representatives from
social justice/equity, active transportation, cultural
and historical organizations, as well as Sacramento
residents and visitors. We will work with City staff to identify all of the key stakeholder perspectives / groups and define their role in the engagement process.

We will create and maintain a database documenting
all of the above referenced information and maintain a
public database of interested parties. This database will be the document for tracking engagement milestone and
participation of key stakeholders and will be used to
distribute communication/project awareness materials

3.4 Stakeholder Focus Meetings / Interviews (6)
We will meet one-on-one or in small groups with
key stakeholders early on in the project process to
assess their organizations’ alignment with the project
goals, their interest and willingness to participate,
and identification of any initiatives that may align
with this project. Our responsibilities will comprise
agenda development, coordination, notification, day-of
facilitation, and summary development.

3.5 Steering Committee Meetings (3)
We will coordinate and facilitate a series of three
steering committee meetings throughout the project
process – two will bookend the initial stage of this
project while developing a project description for
CEQA clearance. The third will take place following
environmental clearance and will focus on activation
and urban design outcomes. A facilitated steering
committee process will allow the City to provide an
opportunity for a robust learning exchange among
the diverse community interests including property
owners, businesses, agencies, event organizers, the
Golden 1 Center, and community advocacy groups.

The meetings will provide a forum for discussion and
allow representatives to create informed opinions about the project and assist the project team with developing context-sensitive concepts for the Capitol Mall corridor.

Key stakeholders will include representatives from
community-based organizations, nonprofit service
providers, and neighborhood groups.

The first committee meeting will focus on sharing this
next phase’s process, schedule, goals, and deliverables, confirming stakeholder’s goals/objectives for the
project, and vetting the “Promenade” concept. The
second committee meeting will provide an opportunity
for representatives to collaborate and provide
feedback on the developed design concepts. The third
meeting will focus on how the final concept will be
implemented and and gather feedback prior to sharing
with the community-at-large.

These meetings will serve as an opportunity for the
City and project team to identify potential project
champions and partners as well as begin coalition

32 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 building. Our responsibilities will comprise agenda
development, coordination, notification, day-of
facilitation, and summary development.

3.6 Public Design Charrettes (2)
In coordination with the City, we will plan, coordinate, and facilitate a public design charrette at two phases of the project.

Phase 1: Early Discovery Work – Self-Guided
Walking Tour
Due to COVID requirements, we will create and
host a 3-week self-guided walking tour of the Capitol
Mall corridor which through virtual and in-person
interaction will allow community members to
provide important input on the early design concept
and additional input on challenges and opportunities
within the corridor. Temporary decals on sidewalks
along the corridor will include quick instructions and
QR codes which lead community members to web
experiences via smartphones. These experiences can
feature historical photographs and fun facts about
Capitol Mall corridor, as well as short video narratives by local and state elected officials, historical experts, and community advocates to share the corridor’s
“Community Story.” Community members will be
invited to provide feedback on the “Promenade”
concept as well as provide comments on challenges
and opportunities. This self-guided walking tour will
create awareness about the project, build coalition
through sharing community narrative of the corridor,
and address COVID requirements for social distancing
while still allowing for community collaborative design by vetting early design concepts.

Phase 2: Concept Alternatives – Virtual Workshop
A virtual community workshop following CEQA
clearance of the project will utilize digital informational tools such as augmented reality, precedent imagery of
placemaking and urban design concepts, infographics,
and animated video clips. We can create the online
interactive workshop using web-based applications (e.g.

Maptionnaire, Social Pinpoint, MetroQuest, Konveio,
Survey Monkey, and/or we can develop our own online
engagement using WordPress and Google Maps) tailored
to the project’s needs that will provide the City and
project team with actionable public data. The community input obtained from this virtual workshop will help
narrow down the design concepts for the corridor.

Deliverables

1. Presentation and summary materials for stakeholder
meetings.

2. Presentation materials for decision maker meetings.

3. Outreach summary report that documents the
process and key findings.

4. AIM will provide all notification materials,
including, but not limited to flyers, posters, social
media, etc., in digital format. If printed materials are needed, then additional costs will need to be added
to the ODC’s.

33 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

4. Traffic Analysis / Transportation
Planning
Our design and outreach teams will be working
closely with the engineering and environmental teams
to develop feasible concepts that are informed by
community input, transportation function, and high-
quality placemaking. The transportation planning team
will be at the nexus of this discussion, helping bridge between vision and reality, taking a diverse range of
stakeholders into account when considering existing
conditions, and future project scenarios.

We will develop a multi-modal transportation
assessment of the Concept Plan, evaluate alternative
design concepts, and provide the necessary inputs and
information for the environmental documents. We
anticipate the transportation scope to comprise the
following elements:

4.1 Data Collection
For traffic analysis purposes, we have assumed
requisition of Streetlight data in order to test
representative traffic activity prior to Shelter-In-Place going into effect. We will also seek reputable data
sources available to the public or from partner agencies (such as SACOG) that could inform transportation
conditions. We will request data and models from
previous studies, particularly the Central City Specific Plan EIR.

4.2 Multi-Modal Transportation Evaluation
We will evaluate pedestrian- and bicycle-focused multi- modal transportation opportunities using available and
acquired data to focus on the quality of the experience for these users and safety. In addition to understanding the road and parking environment, this evaluation
will examine desire lines, crashes, the quality of
pedestrian infrastructure, length of and duration to cross intersection crosswalks, presence and quality of bike
infrastructure, and transit quality and access. This will enable us to understand the transportation environment
holistically, and we will map the opportunities and
constraints around the study area from this perspective.

We will document how equity plays a role in
transportation outcomes, historically, currently, and
speculate how this might change in the future as a
result of the project. The background informing this
understanding is in part built on geospatial analysis,
but more importantly the lived experiences of the
community through the Listen and Learn process
documented in Preliminary Urban Design. These
insights will form the backbone of understanding
community needs and sentiments around transportation
and will be central to delivering a solution that has
community ownership.

We will evaluate concept designs against goals
and objectives established and agreed at the project
inception, to ensure these remain our guiding principles throughout. This evaluation will inform the design
process in a reciprocal way, enabling the best possible outcome to arise from the collaboration of the whole
team.

4.3 Traffic Modeling
At the outset of the project, we will analyze the traffic impact of the “The Promenade” concept on Capitol
Mall, reducing the road width from two lanes each way
to one lane each way at the 4th Street and 3rd Street
intersections. Previous modelling for the Central City
Specific Plan (CCSP) Environmental Impact Report
studied the limits between 5th Street and 9th Street, and we will use the same limits.

Arup will develop a Synchro/SimTraffic model of
the study area for AM and PM peak hour existing
conditions, calibrate the model to recent historical data per our data collection assumptions, and compare the
results to Existing Conditions data for 3rd Street in the CCSP EIR. We will assess the potential need for turn
pockets at these intersections and how a lane reduction will impact congestion, assuming the minimum or worst
level of service (LoS) is E per the City’s General Plan Circulation Element direction for urban roadways.

California’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR)
guidance and industry sentiment suggests that VMT
provides a more balanced view of transportation
infrastructure performance. Our team will take this into consideration when weighing the overall traffic analysis and transportation planning outcomes. To remain
consistent with the CCSP (Section 4.2.3) and Caltrans
regulatory requirements, we will conduct a vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) analysis for our Final Preferred Project (Capitol Mall, from 3rd Street to 9th Street).

Although we are assuming a CEQA exemption due
to SB 288, it is anticipated that Caltrans will want to see limited VMT analysis to demonstrate a “less-than-

34 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 significant-impact” as part of their recently revised
approach to Traffic Impact Studies. We will meet with
the City and Caltrans (including our environmental
team) at the beginning of the project to clarify this
expectation. This analysis will inform the air quality
assessment required for NEPA clearance.

Deliverables

1. A multi-modal transportation study report
including a summary of existing conditions, goals
and objectives, opportunities and constraints,
and findings for each transportation scenario.

The analysis findings will serve as a basis for the
transportation sections in NEPA documentation.

2. Traffic analysis memo detailing the potential impact of “The Promenade” concept.

3. Traffic analysis memo detailing vehicle-miles
travelled impact of preferred project, and subsequent
input into NEPA documentation.

5. Preliminary Design
We will develop preliminary engineering and urban /
landscape design strategies, which will be used as the
basis for the environmental assessment.

5.1 Analysis and Vision Goals
Listen and Learn: We will initiate the project by
synthesizing key data and engaging the City and
Stakeholders in an intensive goal setting and project
principles exercise to focus the work of the visioning
process and identify key outcomes.

This task will be focused, but also an open and rich
conversation regarding the potential of the Capitol
Mall. This first phase of work will set the tone for
sustained conversation. We will demonstrate our
cultural competency, our capacity to listen and discuss the opportunities of the project, and the stories to be told. The research and analysis undertaken in this
phase shall establish confidence with all parties by
demonstrating our team’s technical rigor and unique
understanding of the project conditions. The analysis
will aim to understand the scale and size of spaces, to understand view corridors using 3D models, and analyze
environmental factors that influence personal comfort.

This assessment and analysis will confirm goals, metrics for success and be foundational to the development of
the Plan.

We will gain additional feedback from a site walk /
virtual tour to visualize the space and understand key
stakeholders’ vision for the space. We will conduct
a thorough review of precedents with the aim to
understand of the scale and size of similar project that are successful in creating vibrant and successful spaces.

We will research the various site environmental factors using 3D modeling software and “before and after”
visuals with aim to understand view corridors and the
site’s influence on personal comfort.

With the new knowledge of the Capitol Mall we will
synthesize and identify the urban design goals and
metrics of success. We will include the evaluation of how the Promenade Concept would achieve the design goals
and metrics of success. We will provide a summary of
how the design might achieve the design goals, where it may fall short and a list of potential design directions to explore to better refine the concept.

Deliverables
The following deliverables will be presented to the
public as determined by the Outreach Plan:

1. Vision, Goals and Principles: Evaluation Framework.

Summary presentation and booklet that clearly

35 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 articulates the urban design goals and metrics of
success in an accessible form that can made available
to stakeholders.

2. Site Assessment and Analysis. Graphics in plan,
section and “before and after” 3D model sketches.

3. Opportunities and Constraints. Graphics in plan,
section and sketches.

4. Precedent case studies including analysis of the
projects scale of urban space (sidewalk width, tree
canopy, road configuration, frontages), program
and site environmental factors.

5.2 Alternatives Development
We will synthesize what we’ve heard into a set of
distinct alternatives to stimulate conversations and
garner broad input. This task will develop initial
ideas to establish design concepts for the Capitol Mall that reflect Sacramento’s, the neighborhoods and the
State’s values to create an inclusive, accessible civic main street.

We will continue to solicit community and
stakeholder input for the development of Concept Plan
Alternatives. The alternative scenarios, initial concept plans, may recommend different programs and use
areas, open space character, circulation and mobility.

Stakeholder and public review as a part of the second
round of public engagement, will provide insights into
shared ideas and ambitions for improved public space
and street that provoke our collective imagination.

We will prepare the following deliverables:

1. Road alignment confirmation

2. Urban design alternatives

3. Mobility and active transportation alternatives

4. Urban Forestry and ecology creation strategies

5. Programmatic and activation strategies (including
early wins).

6. Alternatives Evaluation

5.3 Preferred Physical Plan Development
Based on a foundation of community, City, and
stakeholder input to develop a plan for roadway
reconfiguration. This design will be developed to
meet the needs of environmental clearance support
while recognizing potential urban design outcomes
arising from our .

We will evaluate existing ground levels and grading
within the project area to evaluate surface water
drainage and flow patterns, to identifying potential
stormwater quality treatment “Green Infrastructure”
opportunities. Factors to be considered in the
feasibility analysis will include available space
and treatment capacity, maintenance requirements,
construction cost, existing utility constraints, and the impact on pedestrian, bicycle and transit users.

5.4 Draft 35% Design Submittal (Preliminary
Engineering and Cost Estimate)
We will advance the amended Concept Plan design to
the Preliminary Engineering (PE) level.

We will coordinate and document the preferred design
concept and verify that the proposed short-term and
long-term improvements are economically viable. The
documents will describe design intent, materials and
building systems and used for environmental review
and pricing.

Engineering tasks will comprise development of the
following:

1. Preliminary layout plan (including reconfiguration
of curb lines and relocation of bus stops).

2. Preliminary grading and drainage plan.

3. Preliminary stormwater management control plan
incorporating Green Infrastructure opportunities.

4. Preliminary utility plan. We will aim to reduce
or eliminate utility conflicts through the design
optimization process. Should minor utility
relocations be required, we will verify the
feasibility of the relocations with the appropriate
utility provider(s).

5. Preliminary traffic striping and signage.

6. Indicative preliminary traffic signal locations and
foundation depths.

7. Preliminary bus stop relocation plan.

8. Draft statement of probable cost for the preferred
design concept, including basis of the estimate.

We will support the design process with ROM
cost analysis for potential design alternatives.

5.5 City Review
The City will review the draft documents over a
3-week period. Our team will be available to respond
to questions during this time.

36 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

5.6 Final 35% Design Submittal (Preliminary
Engineering and Cost Estimate)
We will update the Draft 35% submittal to
incorporate the City’s comments.

Deliverables
The 35% Design Submittal will comprise the
following:

1. Preliminary Layout Plan (including
reconfiguration of curb lines and relocation of bus
stops)

2. Preliminary grading and drainage plan

3. Preliminary stormwater management control plan

4. Preliminary utility plan

5. Preliminary traffic signal plan

6. Preliminary traffic striping and signage plan

7. One statement of probable cost that accompanies
the above plans

6. Preliminary Funding and Phasing
Strategy

6.1 Funding and Phasing Strategy
This project will likely require funding sources
outside traditional transportation grant programs. We
will investigate the viability of other sources such
as potential real estate revenue from the creation of
programable space, advertisements, parking fees, and
land value capture, among others. Revenue sources
may be used to leverage financing or under as pay as
you go approach.

We will coordinate with City staff to identify the
most viable funding sources and a strategy for phased
implementation. Relevant examples from other
agencies or other corridors may be referenced.

Deliverables

1. Memorandum discussing and assessing potential
funding sources.

37 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

7. Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft Preliminary Design Memorandum
We will prepare a memorandum that presents the
proposed preliminary urban design, street activation,
and ecological strategies, discusses potential phasing
strategies, outlines the environmental findings and
process, and identifies costs (including final design,
construction, and construction management). The
memorandum will summarize the key feedback from
the engagement and discuss how the design was
shaped by the process.

This memorandum will focus primarily on the
physical reconfiguration of the road, incorporating
elements from the urban design, ecology,
implementation, and activation strategies identified
in Task 5. Details for how these strategies will be
realized would be included in Phase 2.

7.2 City Review
The City will review the draft memorandum over a
3-week period. Our team will be available to respond
to questions during this time.

7.3 Draft Preliminary Design Memorandum
We will update the Draft Preliminary Design
Memorandum to incorporate the City’s comments.

Deliverables

1. Preliminary Design Memorandum

8. CEQA / NEPA Documentation
We will perform technical studies to satisfy
requirements for the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) per Caltrans requirements. The CEQA
documentation will be prepared under the oversight of
City of Sacramento Environmental Staff.

8.1. Project Description
Use engineer/design team-provided details, depictions,
and narrative project description of the selected
alternative to prepare a written description of the
proposed project suitable for use in the environmental
documentation. Use provided suitably scaled exhibits as figures to accompany the description.

Focus project description on details of the road
reconfiguration, with clear goals for the future activation, urban design, and landscape outcomes.

Deliverables

1. Draft and Final Project Description

8.2 CEQA – Documentation of Statutory
Exemption
In memo format for use by the City, we will identify
applicable mitigation measures adopted for the Central
City Specific Plan and General Plan that would reduce
project impacts. We will include the project description in memorandum and describe the applicability of the
project to the statutory exemption defined by Public
Resources Code Section 21080.25.

Because this exemption is due to expire on January
1st 2023, our team may need to support the City’s
requirements for exemption in advance of concluding
the majority of NEPA studies, but where possible will
incorporate the NEPA analysis results to inform the
CEQA exemption process. We will support the City with
their preparation and filing of a notice of exemption.

Deliverables

1. Memorandum with project description and
mitigation measures from Central City Specific Plan
EIR and/or General Plan EIR that would apply to the
proposed project

8.3. NEPA – Technical Studies
For the preferred plan alternative, we will prepare the studies and memoranda identified below to support
the NEPA document in accordance with the Caltrans
Standard Environmental Reference (SER) guidelines.

38 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 We will begin preparation of the technical studies
following approval of the preferred alternative by the
City for use in the environmental analysis and following confirmation that neither the project description nor
design will change substantially enough to require
revisions to the studies once begun.

The technical studies will be based on the project
description, the 35% Design Submittal, exhibits for the build alternative including limits of disturbance (both temporary and permanent), aerial photography, ROW,
topography, and engineering plans in georeferenced
spatial format along with parcel data; construction
approach, sequence and schedule, including details
needed for construction emissions modeling; and list of equipment to be used during construction.

Section 106 Finding of (No Adverse) Effect
We will prepare a Finding of Effect (FOE) report to
document the analysis of potential adverse effects of the selected alternative on up to seven (7) historic resources that intersect with the project APE.

We will determine whether the proposed project may
alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of the historic properties that qualify them for inclusion in local, state, or federal registers in a manner that would diminish the historic integrity of their location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association.

We will consider the full extent of qualifying
characteristics of the historic properties, including those that may have been identified subsequent to the original evaluation of eligibility for the NRHP and will consider reasonably foreseeable effects caused by the proposed
project that may occur later in time, be farther removed in distance, or be cumulative.

Section 4(f) Documentation
We will evaluate up to eight (8) Section 4(f) resources for potential impacts. Resources are assumed to be seven (7) historic resources potentially eligible for listing in, already listed in, or presumed eligible for listing in the NRHP for the purposes of this project only, and one
public park (Crocker Park).

Consistent with the assumed Section 106 Finding of No
Adverse Effect for all historic resources, we will make the appropriate Section 4(f) findings. We anticipate
making a “de minimis” Section 4(f) finding for up to
five historic resources. We will document no use of
adjacent historic resources for which the project would not adversely affect the activities, features, or attributes of the resource, and address proximity impacts.

We will coordinate with agencies with jurisdiction
over the resources to obtain written concurrence of the Section 4(f) evaluation, as required by law. We will
coordinate with the City and agencies with jurisdiction over the resources to determine if Land and Water
Conservation Fund Act grants were used.

Visual Impact Assessment
We will prepare a Minor Visual Impact Assessment,
using analytical methods and protocols developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and adopted
by Caltrans. We will conduct a desktop review using
Google Maps and Google Street View to assess the
existing visual resource conditions in the project area for use in preparing the analysis.

We will consult with the appropriate Caltrans staff to
confirm the location and view for photo simulations.

Photo realistic simulations prepared during Preliminary Design will aid in the visual impact analysis. In the
report, we will define the project location and setting; describe visual resources and resource change and
viewer groups and viewer responses associate with the
project; and evaluate potential visual impacts caused by the proposed project, including any proposed measures
to reduce impacts.

Noise Study – memorandum – construction only
We will use construction and equipment assumptions
to prepare a technical memo addressing temporary
construction noise. This will document City noise
ordinance compliance.

Air Quality Study – memorandum – construction only
We will use construction and equipment assumptions
to model construction emissions and provide the
preliminary emissions results to engineers/City to
confirm construction assumptions. We will prepare
a technical memorandum to address construction
emissions and document that the project would not result in long-term changes in criteria pollutant or greenhouse gas emissions.

We assume that the project is exempt from conformity
per 40 CFR 93.126 Table 2, projects that correct,
improve, or eliminate a hazardous location or feature.

We will complete the Caltrans conformity checklist to
document the exemption.

39 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 Other Environmental Topics – memorandum
We will prepare a single memorandum to document
results for biological resources; known hazardous
materials sites; changes in land use and community
character; growth; changes in stormwater runoff and
impervious surfaces; and document no change to
floodplains. This will reference relevant and already
adopted avoidance, minimization and/or mitigation
measures and applicable standard specifications.

Deliverables

1. Administrative Draft (local agency review), Draft
(Caltrans 1st review), Revised Draft (Caltrans 2nd
review), and Final (Caltrans signed) Studies [PDF
plus one printed copy each for Caltrans].

2. Final FOE [MS Word, PDF, 4 printed copies] for
Caltrans HQ and SHPO.

3. Completed Air Quality Conformity Checklist.

NEPA Categorical Exclusion
We will document that the project qualifies for coverage under an existing categorical exclusion (CE) from NEPA.

It appears that the project could be approved under a 23 USC 326 CE such as 23 CFR 771.117(c)3 (bike and ped
lanes).

We will complete a draft of the Categorical Exclusion
(CE) Checklist and a draft CE Determination Form and
will attach a summary document (two to three pages) of
the environmental issues and project findings. After
technical studies are complete, we will submit the
forms for Caltrans to finalize and approve.

Deliverables

1. D raft CE Checklist

2. D raft CE Determination Form

40 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 Assumptions
This proposal is based upon the following
assumptions:

General Assumptions

1. Our cost of services has assumed a specific
schedule with some limited room for variation.

If the schedule duration extends beyond an
additional 6 months or is delayed to a similar
degree, our costs could exceed the original budget,
whether through rate increases or potential
increased project management time, and we would
need to reassess the overall budget of this project.

We would seek to work with the City to limit the
likelihood of such an event by closely managing
the schedule and would provide advanced warning
if this eventuality appears likely.

2. Drawings will be prepared using AutoCAD Civil
3d (2012).

3. Layout plans will be at 1” = 20’ scale, unless
otherwise noted.

4. Work will not extend beyond the limits shown
in the Realignment Concept Plan provided in
Appendix K of the RFP.

5. Utility relocations, if required, will be minor
(requiring less than 30ft per relocated utility, and
no more than 200ft of total relocations).

Meetings

6. Meetings will be held virtually unless otherwise
stated.

7. Design team meetings will be 2 hours or less in
duration.

8. Our team will be responsible for arranging the
venue and setup and take down for public outreach
events, excluding insurance or direct payments for
venues and the provision of refreshments.

9. Two 3-hour meetings for all transit agencies
will be held in Sacramento or virtually. The
first of these meetings will take place as the
Preliminary Urban Design task is beginning, with
an additional meeting to review modifications
resulting from the input received early on.

Review

10. At the kick-off we will agree on standard City
review periods.

11. Each deliverable that requires review will undergo
a single round of review unless otherwise stated.

12. City will provide a single set of consolidated,
internally-consistent comments.

Receivables

13. City has sufficient data available to commence
work following notice to proceed and where
critical information is unavailable the City will
acquire this data by survey or other methods.

General Exclusions
The following services are not included:

1. Environmental engineering and support.

2. Hazardous materials mitigations.

These services can be provided as additional services
if requested:

1. Geotechnical engineering or investigations.

2. Utility potholing.

3. Design of the following utility systems: sanitary
sewer, fire water, recycled water, electrical, gas
and IT communications.

4. The detail design of stormwater quality treatment
features such as raingardens, swales, etc, if they
are deemed to be feasible during 35% design.

5. Profile drawings of utility systems.

6. Design of major utility relocations (greater than
30 feet long).

7. Off-site utility improvements.

8. Sustainability consulting including design team
coordination and documentation required to
prepare an application for LEED or GreenPoint
Certification.

9. Design of exterior site structures, e.g. retaining
walls, seat walls, benches, biofiltration planters,
etc..

10. Corrosion testing and consulting.

11. Soil strength testing.

12. Plan iterations beyond those described herein.

41 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 Environmental Assumptions

1. PES form will include and rely on engineer-
provided project footprint map, available
engineering drawings, project details, depictions,
and narrative project description information.

2. Environmental project manager and lead historian
will attend PES/Field Review site visit.

3. Due to the urban setting, no archaeological
pedestrian survey will be required. No
archaeological resources will be identified as a
result of the cultural studies. No test excavations
(extended Phase 1 testing) will be necessary to
evaluate archaeological resources.

4. Environmental impact analysis of the selected
project design alternative will occur as part of the
Environmental Documentation task.

5. No new evaluations or updates to DPR forms will
be needed for cultural resources.

6. Up to two historic resources are presumed eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places: Capitol Mall (the roadway itself) between
3rd Street and 9th Street, and the Sacramento
Register Capitol Historic District. This approach
requires Caltrans’ approval and eliminates the
need to evaluate the eligibility of the resources for
NRHP listing and seek SHPO concurrence.

7. Once information on the selected alternative
is provided for the environmental impact
analysis, very limited coordination with the
project development team will be necessary to
manage, oversee, and complete the environmental
documentation effort. Additional efforts will
require an augmentation to the scope and budget.

Project Description:

8. Once provided to the environmental team
members, the details, depictions, and narrative
description of the selected project alternative
will not change substantially enough to require
revisions to the environmental project description
or analyses based on it.

9. City will review the environmental project
description in advance, prior to issuing to Caltrans
team members.

CEQA Documentation:

10. City agrees that project is statutorily exempt from CEQA as defined by Public Resources Code
Section 21080.25.

11. City will file CEQA Notice of Exemption and pay
any filing fees.

12. City will prepare the Staff Report for City Council hearing for the approval of the project.

13. AB 52 tribal consultation is not necessary for
CEQA.

Technical Studies:

14. One project design will be provided for the
environmental analysis.

15. If revisions to the technical reports are required
based on changes to the project description or
design, or if we need to manipulate design files to
integrate them into GIS, additional budget may be
required.

16. No archaeological resources will be identified as
a result of the cultural studies. No test excavations
(extended Phase 1 testing) will be necessary to
evaluate archaeological resources.

17. Minor Visual Impact Assessment is appropriate
as determined by the Caltrans’ Visual Impact
Assessment Preparation Questionnaire Tool.

18. Provided simulations will depict pre-project and
post-project conditions at each location.

19. Any requested format changes to standard
Caltrans’ MVIA or other template posted to
Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference
website will require a scope and cost modification.

20. Engineering/design team will conduct a field visit
to photo document the views to be used in photo
simulations. The location for the simulations will
be selected to depict the most sensitive public
views that is subject to change. The location and
view will be representative of the project site and
potential for impact.

21. Project is exempt from conformity per 40 CFR

93.126 Table 2, projects that correct, improve,
or eliminate a hazardous location or feature.

Concurrence through interagency consultation
(IAC) is not required because EPA and FHWA
have already agreed that road diet projects are
exempt.

42 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020

22. A finding of no adverse effect to historic
properties can be achieved, and, as a result,
preparation of a Memorandum of Agreement
and documents defining mitigation measures for
historic resources will not be necessary.

23. No changes to the Finding of Effect will be needed
after report is submitted to Caltrans Headquarters
and SHPO.

24. SHPO will concur with a finding of no adverse
effect on historic resources

25. Finding of Effect and Section 4(f) documents will
address potential effects on the following historic
resources: Capitol Mall State Buildings Historic
District; CA State Government Buildings Historic
District; Capitol Extension District; CA State
Capitol Complex; Historic State Capitol Building;
Sacramento Register Capitol Historic District and
Capitol Mall (between 3rd and 9th), which for
the purpose of this scope can both be presumed
eligible for the NRHP for this project only per the
provisions of the Section 106 PA.

26. Only the technical studies and memoranda listed
in this scope of services will be required by
Caltrans to support NEPA compliance. For topics
not addressed in stand-alone documents (identified
above), or eliminated after preparation of the PES
form, a combined memorandum will suffice to
document the potential for impacts.

27. Environmental documents will only be posted
to a local agency website and do not need to be
508-compliant.

NEPA Categorical Exclusion:

28. Caltrans agrees that the project qualifies for a 23 USC 326 exclusion from NEPA

29. SHPO will concur with a finding of no adverse
effect on historic resources.

30. Caltrans will finalize and approve the CE
Checklist and CE Determination Form.

31. If project impacts are identified that would
necessitate the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) to address NEPA requirements, a
budget augmentation would be necessary.

43 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 Proposed Additional Phase 2 Tasks
Recommended in Parallel with or
immediately following Phase 1
In order to manage a tight schedule and deliver a
world-class design for Capitol Mall we have split our
scope into phases. Phase 1 completes environmental
clearance and establishes a basis for more extensive
design thinking and community engagement to be
completed in optional Phase 2.

This phase will allow for more thoughtful
development of implementation, activation, ecology,
and urban design strategies, ensuring the community
has a greater opportunity to participate and shape
their creation. These tasks are not included in the
overall fee and would need to be properly scoped and
budgeted separately.

Urban Design Preferred Plan Development
Based on the feedback received throughout Phase 1,
we will develop a Preferred Plan for Urban Design
in collaboration with the City, stakeholders, and the
public.

The Preferred Plan will aim to truly reflect the ideas
and aspiration of Sacramento’s diverse communities
and be economically and technically feasible.

It will evolve directly out of the meetings and
collaboration completed with City Staff and key
stakeholders. Working draft versions will be shared
with stakeholders for collaborative feedback.

Through continued outreach, we will empower
community members to become stewards who will
care for and guide the evolution of this shared public
space. This stewardship will be formalized though an
Implementation Plan that includes short- and long-
term strategies for the improvement of the open space
and its facilities.

Schematic Urban Design Submittal (35%)
Using the physical design developed in Phase 1 as
a foundation for design, we will hone the general
strategies around implementation, activation, ecology,
and urban design into a physical plan for the space to
35% design. This will include:

32. A vision for street/pedestrian lighting within the
project area.

33. Preliminary landscape plan that shows new
amenities and street furniture.

Experiential Community Engagement Event
We will develop the event concept, plan, coordinate
logistics for, and facilitate an experiential community engagement event to provide an opportunity for
community collaboration in a shared public space. The
event will take place for one day on the Capitol Mall
corridor and include a variety of temporary installation stations that can engage community members in
creative play, physical activities, group games, and
collaborative art. The event will demonstrate how the
Capitol Mall area is a local asset with the potential
to be a quality public space that contributes to the
community’s health, happiness, and well-being.

We will seek to partner with the City and stakeholder
representatives such as the Downtown Sacramento
Partnership to secure the event space and other
equipment and supplies. We will develop an event plan,
day-of guide, and coordinate all interactive stations.

We will facilitate the day-long event and provide the
City with a summary of the event including number of
participants, observations, community feedback, and
photography / videography.

Temporary Installation
Based on client direction we will provide an optional
plan to construct a temporary installation or closure of the street to help uncover what works (and what doesn’t) from the Promenade Concept Design to inform design
before making commitments. This could be as simple as
painting or re-striping portions of the street/sidewalk or even use temporary barriers in the same manner the City has employed for outdoor dining during Covid.

Funding and Phasing Strategy
This task will include a rough order of magnitude
assessment of the amount of funding potentially
available from each funding source.

44 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 Other Optional Tasks
Climate Positive Landscape Design and Carbon
Sequestration Strategy
The Capitol Mall Vision Plan presents an opportunity
to transform the site into an integrated and visionary
community space. The team envisions a street that
emphasizes connectivity and enhances regional
environmental, social and economic health well into
the future. In addition to robust environmental issues, our team sees an opportunity for the street to be a
unique, leading edge example of a carbon neutral
public space.

This optional scope would support the overall vision
of creating an innovative street and civic space
that sets out an ambitious strategy to use the larger
landscape and open space areas to ensure that the site
and landscape are Climate Positive, by designing the
landscape to sequester more carbon than is embodied
in its construction.

This scope of work would include developing a
climate positive design model for analyze a series of
carbon scenarios and establish a long-term program
for establishment and management of the landscape
to minimize emissions and maximize sequestration.

Evaluation will occur during each phase of the
project, beginning with Concept Design.

Tactical Projects and Prototypes
Tactical projects, including temporary actions, events, and activities, can explore new programmatic and
spatial ideas for the Capitol Mall, cultivate new
perceptions of these public spaces by the public, and
inspire new thinking among the groups involved in
managing and activating the mall’s public space. Its
interactive benefits include:

1. Encourages people to work together in new ways
- strengthening relationships between residents,
businesses, and government agencies.

2. Allows people to physically experience a different
reality today - a low-risk way to re-imagine
placemaking.

3. Widen public engagement - take ideas from paper
to pavement, and gather feedback from real-world
users of streets and other public spaces.

4. Help uncover what works (and what doesn’t)
before making large investments.

We believe testing ideas through tactical projects will have an ongoing and important role to play in the
exploration of design, programming, and operations
concepts informing the Public Space engagement and
design process. These projects will build institutional and community capacity for visualizing change and
imagining possibilities, by testing and envisioning
ideas for the Mall’s public spaces as they evolve over
time.

Digital Model and Virtual Reality
CMG will prepare a digital model as the basis of
renderings and other project representation. This
model could be employed to provide an immersive
virtual reality (VR) experience of the concept
alternatives and Preferred Plan. VR has proven to be
a very captivating and successful tool for interaction, public engagement and inspiration.

Local Cultural Working Group
Remember and Imagine—A Local Cultural Working
Group to explore stories of the past and possibilities
for future public life.

Our team will meet local community members
invited to lead personal tours of Capitol Mall and
adjacent neighborhoods. Based on the interest of
individuals to continue project participation, our team will meet at regular intervals in the project process
specifically to solicit stories of the past, present and possible futures, as well as ideas that can inform the
public engagement process. With the project goal to
design a framework for public life, we hope to solicit
ideas to inform programming to right size necessary
space and infrastructure to allow for art and cultural
expression, events and even community based
commercial activity.

We anticipate the CWG providing:

1. Occasional commentary and review of our work
during the course of the project, again providing
insight commentary and direction.

2. Commentary/editing for recommendations and
actions as part of the Vision Plan as they relate to
cultural themes and stories local commerce and
community expression.

3. Advocacy and commentary for the broadest range
of cultural issues, without a specific agenda.

45 Arup | Capitol Mall Revitalization Project #:T15175100 | December 18, 2020 We will work with the City to identify the individuals
who will participate to represent the voices from
the past, present and future. Identify individuals via
the self-guided walking tour. If you have a story to
tell, come out and tell the story, and indicate your
willingness to participate in the CWG.

We would like to explore the option to compensate the
participants.

Topographic Surveying
We will supplement the imagery by means of
topographic surveying and mapping to further inform
the conceptual and preliminary engineering design.

We will field locate the back of sidewalk, curbs,
flowlines, lip of gutter, medians and lane striping
features within the project limits. The base map will
include the locations of visible utilities within the
existing roadway corridor such as manholes, valves,
meters, vaults, lids, drop inlets, hydrants, pull boxes, cabinets, transformers, signal boxes, poles, light poles, signals and other visible utilities.

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit B - Page 1

EXHIBIT B
PA
YMENT

1. CONT
RACTOR’s Compensation. The total of all fees paid to the CONTRACTOR for the provision of Services as set forth in Exhibit A, including any authorized reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed the total sum of $ 635,951.80. The payments specified in this Exhibit B shall be the only payments made to Contractor unless the City approves a Supplemental Contract.

2. Billab
le Rates. Contractor shall be paid for the performance of Services on an hourly rate, daily rate, flat fee, lump sum, or other basis, as set forth in Exhibit A or Attachment 1 to this Exhibit B and any applicable special provisions included in the request for bids or proposals. If there is a conflict between Exhibit A or Exhibit B and the Special Provisions, Exhibit A or Exhibit B controls.

3. CONT
RACTOR’s Reimbursable Expenses. “Reimbursable Expenses ” are limited to actual expenditures of CONTRACTOR for expenses that are necessary for the proper satisfaction of the Contract and are only payable if specifically authorized in advance in writing by the City. No charges or markup will be allowed unless specifi ed in the Contract, including charges for travel and transportation.

4. Paym
ents to CONTRACTOR. Contractor is responsible for supplying all documentation necessary to verify invoices to the City’s satisfaction.

A. Pay
ments to CONTRACTOR shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of CONTRACTOR’s invoice, in proportion to services performed or as otherwise specified in Attachment 1 to Exhibit B. CONTRACTOR may request payment on a monthly basis.

CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the cost of supplying all documentation necessary to verify the monthly billings to the satisfaction of CITY.

B. Inv
oices must be submitted to either of the addresses specified below. (1) Email. Submit email invoices and any attachments to:
[email protected]
(2) P
ostal Mail. If emailing is not an option, mail to:

A/P Processing Center
City of Sacramento
915 I Street, Floor 4
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
C. All invoices submitted by CONTRACTOR must contain the following information:
(1) Jo
b/Project Name
(2) CITY’s current Purchase Order Number
(3) CONTRACTOR’s Invoice Number
(4) Date of Invoice Issuance
(5) Work Order Number (if applicable)
(6) CITY representative identified on the Purchase Order

Form Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit B - Page 2 (7) CONTRACTOR’s remit address
(8) Description of services billed under Invoice
(9) Amount of Invoice (itemize all authorized Reimbursable Expenses) (10) Total Billed to Date under Contract (if applicable)

D. Items must be separated into Services and Reimbursable Expenses. Invoices that do not conform to the format outlined above wi ll be returned to CONTRACTOR for correction.

CITY is not responsible for delays in payment to CONTRACTOR resulting from CONTRACTOR’s failure to comply with the invoice format described above.

5. Additional Services. Additional Services shall be provided only when a Supplemental Contract authorizing the Additional Services is approved in writing by the City in accordance with the City’s contract amendment procedures. The City reserves the right to perform any Additional Services with its own staff or to retain other contractors to perform the Additional Services.

6. Accounting Records of CONTRACTOR. During performance of this Contract and for a period of three years after completi on of performance, CONTRACTOR shall maintain all account ing and financial records related to this Contract, in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, including records of Contractor’s costs for performance under this Contract and records of Contractor’s Reimbursable Expenses. Contractor shall keep and make records available for inspection and audit by representatives of the CITY upon reasonable written notice.

7. Tax Payments. CONTRACTOR shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of CONTRACTOR’s compensation hereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide CITY with proof of the payment upon request. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify CITY for any claims, losses, costs, fees, liabilities, damages or injuries suffered by CITY arising out of CONTRACTOR’s breach of this section.

1 Last Updated 6/8/15
Attachment 1 to Exhibit B

I.   COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT

A. CONTRACTOR shall not commence performance until a written “Notice to Proceed” has been issued by CITY Project Manager.

B. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed for services at the specific rate of compensation in the approved 10‐H Form(s). Unless specifically iden tified  as some other method, the specified rates shall include direct/base hourly rate, fringe benefits, overhead, and profit.

C. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed for Other Direct Costs (ODC), at rates as identified on the approved 10‐H Form(s) with receipts for actual costs.

D. If applicable, CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wages to those worke rs employed on public works contracts performing applicable duties as required by the State Labor Code and City Code 3.60.180. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to prevailing wage rates including, but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the Dep artment  of Industrial Relations.

Based on prevailing adjustments, CONTRACTOR may request an adjustment in the rate(s) in the 10‐H form. These adjusted rates will not go into effect until the approval date by the City of the Supplemental Agreement.  CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that ta ke  place during the term of the Agreement.  A mistake, inadvertence, or neglect by CONTRACTOR in failing to pay the correct rates of prevailing wage will be remedied solely by CONTRACTOR and will not, under any circumstances, be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY on this Agreement.

E. Unless spe
cifically stated, the contract shall be a not‐to‐exceed by task, Other Direct Cost (ODC) line item, and total budget as included in the Cost Proposal. Written approval by CITY Project Manager is required for reallocation of budget between tasks, between ODC line items, or between tasks and OD Cs.  All reallocation requests must include a revised Cost Proposal. If the reallocation will directly or indirectly require an increase in the total contract amount, it will be require a Supplemental Agreement to be approved by the CITY as described in Section G.

F. Written approval by CITY Project Manag er is required for  any staff substitutions or additions of staff under classifications included in the 10‐H Form(s).

2 Last Updated 6/8/15

1. Updated 10‐H Form(s) for CONTRACTOR and all SUBCONTRACTORS shall be included.

2. Any addition or substitution shall be paid at the same or lower rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

3. If a substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR shall request and justify the need for substitution and obtain written appr oval from CITY Project Manager.

The justification shall include a resume of the proposed new Key Staff.

If the staff addition or substitution will include a new classification, any rate increase, or will directly or indirectly require an increase in total contract amount, it will require a Supplemental Agree ment to be approved by the CITY as described in Section G.

No work shall commence until written approval by the CITY Project Manager.  Any work not in compliance with the above, and performed prior to the date of approval by the City, shall not be reimbursed.

G. Supplemental Agreem ents  are required for any changes to the scope and terms of the agreement, including but not limited to the following:

1. Increasing the Agreement not‐to‐exceed amount.
a. Any increase to the not‐to‐exceed amount shall include a cost proposal documenting the increase.

2. Adding task(s) within the advertised scope .

3. Adding new classifications or adjusting rates:
a. Updated 10‐H Form(s) for CONTRACTOR and all SUBCONTRACTORS shall be included.
b. CONTRACTOR may request cost of living increases in base salary of staff after the contract has been in effect for one year. The maximum increase, if approved, shall be the annual Cos
t of Living Adjustment (COLA) increase as
calculated and used by the Social Security Administration. Any approved increase shall not go into effect until a Supplemental Agreement is executed.

4.   Adding SUBCONTRACTORS.

5.   Adding new Other Direct Cost (ODC) items not included in 10‐H Form.

6.   Extending the sun
set date of the Agreement.

3 Last Updated 6/8/15

No work shall commence until the Supplemental Agreement is executed and written notification has been provided by CITY Project Manager.  Any work not in compliance with the above, and performed prior to the date of the execution of the Supplemental Agreement by the City, shall not be reimbursed.

H. Monthly In voices

1. Invoices shall be made in arrears based on services provided at specific hourly rates and other direct cost(s) incurred per the approved 10‐H Form(s).

2. CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTOR invoices shall be submitted using the City‐ template and include the following:
a. Task, Budget, and Billing Summary.
b. A copy of al l invoices for Other Direct Costs and appropriate back up documentation, at rates consistent with the approved 10‐H Form(s). c. A copy of SUBCONTRACTOR invoices using the City template. d. CONTRACTOR Project Manager’s signature certifying that all charges have been reviewed and are in compliance with the co ntract  terms. e. Written approval of CITY Project Manager for any overtime expenses for Prevailing Wage staff consistent with the approved 10‐H Form(s). f. Written approval by CITY and CONTRACTOR of Reallocation of Budget between Tasks or between Tasks and Other Direct Costs.

3. For non‐federally funded projects, CON TRACTOR shall meet the 5% Local Business Enterprise (LBE) participation requirement, unless an LBE waiver has been obtained by CITY Project Manager prior to the agreement being executed.

CONTRACTOR will track LBE utilization, including for all subcontractors, and include the percentage achieved with each invoice.  The 5% requirement only applies to those ag
reements awarded for a not‐to‐exceed amount over $100,000.

4. For federally funded projects in compliance with 49 CFR 26.37, a Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Utilization Report (Form ADM‐3069) is required, as specified in this Agreement.

5. CONTRACTOR may include SUBCONTRACTOR costs that are treated by the CON
TRACTOR as accrued due to such costs having been billed by the SUBCONTRACTOR to CONTRACTOR and recognized by CONTRACTOR and CITY as valid, undisputed, due and payable.

4 Last Updated 6/8/15

6. CONTRACTOR shall not add a mark‐up to SUBCONTRACTORs for professional services or other direct costs included in the approved 10‐H form(s).

7. Invoices for approved monthly services shall be submitted by CONTRACTOR and received by CITY Project Manager within 45 calendar days of the completion of the approved monthly services  specified in the Task, Budget, and Billing Summary.

B. In addition,
CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for incurred (actual) direct costs other than salary costs that are in the cost proposal
and identified in the cost proposal and in the executed Task Order.

C. Specific projects will be assigned to CONSULTANT through issuance of Task Orders.

D. After a project to be performed under this contract is identified by LOCAL AGENCY, LOCAL AGENCY
will prepare a draft Task Order; less the cost estimate. A draft Task Order will identify the scope of services, expected results, project deliverables, period of performance, project schedule and will designate a LOCAL AGENCY Project Coordinator. The draft Task Order will be delivered to CONSULTANT for review. CONSULTANT shall re turn the draft Task Order within ten (10) calendar days along with a Cost Estimate, including a written estimate of the number of hours and hourly rates per staff person, any anticipated reimbursable expenses, overhead, fee if any, and total dollar amount. After agreement has been reached on the negotiable item s and total cost; the finalized Task Order shall be signed by both LOCAL AGENCY and CONSULTANT.

E. Task Orders may be negotiated for a lump sum (Firm Fixed Price) or for specific rates of compensation, both of which must be based on the labor and other rates set forth in CONSULTANT’s
Cost Proposal.

F. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates as specified in the approved Cost Proposal.

ARTICLE IV PERFORMANCE PERIOD (Verbatim)
A. This contract shall go into effect on  March 22, 2022________________________, contingent upon approval by
LOCAL AGENCY, and CONSULTANT shall commence work after notification to proceed by LOCAL  AGENCY’S Contract  Administrator.  The  contract  shall  end  on  12/31/23__________, unless extended by contract amendment.

B. CONSULTANT is advised that any recommendation for contract award is not binding on LOCAL AGENCY until the contract is fully executed and approved by LOCAL AGENCY.

ARTICLE V ALLOWABLE COSTS AND PAYMENTS (Verbatim)
A. CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for hours worked at the hourly rates specified in CONSULTANTs Cost Proposal (Attachment Number). The specified hourly rates shall include direct salary costs, employee benefits, overhead, and fee. These rates are not adjustable for the performance period set forth in this Contract.

5 Last Updated 6/8/15
G. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, CONSULTANT shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the Contract Administrator before exceeding such estimate.

H. Progress payments for each Task Order will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and actual costs incurred.

I. CONSULTANT
shall not commence performance of work or services until this contract has been approved by LOCAL AGENCY, and notification to proceed has been issued by LOCAL AGENCY’S Contract Administrator. No payment will be made prior to approval or for any work performed prior to approval of this contract.

J. A Task Order is of no force or effect
until returned to LOCAL AGENCY and signed by an
authorized representative of LOCAL AGENCY. No expenditures are authorized on a project and work shall not commence until a Task Order for that project has been executed by LOCAL AGENCY.

K. CONSULTANT
will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will permit upon receipt by LOCAL AGENCY’S Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in triplicate. Separate invoices itemizing all costs are required for all work performed under each Task Order. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance  of work for which CONSULTANT is billing, or upon completion of the Task Order. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone, on each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this contract number, project title and Task Order number. Credits due LOCA
L AGENCY that include any equipment purchased under the provisions of Article XI Equipment Purchase of this contract, must be reimbursed by CONSULTANT prior to the expiration or termination of this contract. Invoices shall be mailed to LOCAL AGENCY’s Contract Administrator at the following address:

City of Sacramento
Depa
rtment of Public Works
Mr. Jose Ledesma
915 I Street Room 2000
Sacramento, California. 95814
L. The period of performance for Task Orders shall be in accordance with dates specified in the Task Order. No Task Order will be written which extends beyond the expiration date of this Contract.

M. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGE
NCY for an individual Task Order shall not exceed the
amount agreed to in the Task Order, unless authorized by contract amendment.

N. If the Consultant fails to satisfactorily complete a deliverable according to the schedule set forth in a Task Order, no payment will be made until the  deliverable has been satisfactorily completed.

O. Task Orders may not be used to amend this Agreement and may not exceed the scope of work under this Agreement.

6 Last Updated 6/8/15
P. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGENCY for all Task Orders resulting from this contract shall not exceed $______________. It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied that this dollar amount will be authorized under this contract through Task Orders.

Q. All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall  contain the above provisions.

ARTICLE VI TERMINATION (Verbatim)
A. LOCAL AGENCY reserves the right to terminate this contract upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT with the reasons for termination stated in the notice.

B. LOCAL AGENCY may terminate this contract with CONSULTANT should CONSULTANT fail to perform the
covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination, LOCAL AGENCY may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by LOCAL AGENCY. If LOCAL AGENCY terminates this contract with CONSULTANT, LOCAL AGENCY shall pay CONSULTANT the sum due to CONSULTANT  under this contract prior to termination, unless the cost of completion to LOCAL AGENCY exceeds the funds remaining in the contract. In which case the overage shall be deducted from any sum due CONSULTANT under this contract and the balance, if any, shall be paid to CONSULTANT  upon demand.

C. The maximum amount for which the Government shall be liable if this contract is terminated is $500 dollars.

ARTICLE VII COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS (Verbatim) A. CONSULTANT agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq. , shall be used to determine the cost allowability of individual items.

B. CONSULTANT also agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.

C. Any costs for which payment has been made to CONSULTANT  that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 49 CFR, Part 18 and 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject to repayment by CONSULTANT to LOCAL AGENCY.

D. All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the above provisions. 635,951.80

7 Last Updated 6/8/15
ARTICLE VIII RETENTION OF RECORDS/AUDIT (Verbatim)
For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters connected with the performance of the contract pursuant to Government Code 8546.7; CONSULTANT, subconsultants, and LOCAL AGENCY shall maintain and make av ailable for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the contract, including but not limited to, the costs of administering the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the cont
ract period and for three years from the date of final payment under the contract. The state, State Auditor, LOCAL AGENCY, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of CONSULTANT and it’s certified public accountants (CPA) work papers tha t are pertinent to the contract and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain this provision.

ARTICLE IX AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES (Verbatim)
A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an inte rim or post audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

B. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing.

C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by LOCAL AGENCY will excuse
CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this contract. (The following AUDIT CLAUSE must be inserted into all  contracts of $150,000 or greater) D. CONSULTANT and subconsultant contracts, including cost proposals and ICR, are subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, a contract audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the  contract, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are
allowed full access to the CPA’s work papers including making copies as necessary. The contract, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by LOCAL AGENCY contract manager to conform to the audit or review recommendations.

CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the  audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by LOCAL AGENCY at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be consider
ed a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

8 Last Updated 6/8/15
ARTICLE X SUBCONTRACTING (Verbatim)
A. Nothing contained in this contract or otherwise, shall create any contractual relation between
LOCAL AGENCY and any subconsultant(s), and no subcontract shall relieve CONSULTANT of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees to be as fully responsible to LOCAL AGENCY for the acts and omissions of its subconsultant(s)  and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT’s obligation to pay its subconsultant(s) is an independent obligation from LOCAL AGENCY’S obligation to make payments to the CONSULTANT.

B. CONSULTANT shall perform the  work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by LOCAL AGENCY’s Contract Administrator, except that, which is expressly identified in the approved Cost Proposal.

C. CONSULTANT shall pay its subconsultants within ten (10) calendar days from  receipt of each payment made to CONSULTANT by LOCAL AGENCY.

D. Any subcontract in excess of $25,000 entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this contract to be applicable to subconsultants.

E. Any substitution of subconsultant(s) must be approved in writing by LOCAL AGENCY’s Contract Administrator
prior to the start of work by the subconsultant(s).

9 Last Updated 6/8/15
ARTICLE XI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE (Verbatim)
A. Prior authorization in writing, by LOCAL AGENCY’s Contract Administrator shall be required before CONSULTANT enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding $5,000 for supplies, equipment, or CONSULTANT services. CONSULTANT shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs.

B. For purchase of any item, service  or consulting work not covered in CONSULTANT’s Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization by LOCAL AGENCY’s Contract Administrator; three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified.

C. Any equipment purchased as a result of this contract  is subject to the following:
“CONSULTANT shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property. Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, LOCAL AGENCY shall rece
ive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the contract, or if the contract is terminated, CONSULTANT may either keep the equipment and credit LOCAL AGENCY in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance
with established LOCAL AGENCY procedures; and credit
LOCAL AGENCY in an amount equal to the sales price. If CONSULTANT elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at CONSULTANT’s expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by LOCAL AGENCY
and CONSULTANT, if it is determined to sell
the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by LOCAL AGENCY.” 49 CFR, Part 18 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than
$5,000 is credited to the project.

D. All subcontracts in excess $25,000 shall contain the above provisions.

ARTICLE XII STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATES (Verbatim)
A. CONSULTANT shall comply with the State of California’s General Prevailing Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor  Code, Section 1770, and all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work.

B. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, if for more than $25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance of public works,  shall contain all of the provisions of this Article.

C. When prevailing wages apply to the services described in the scope of work, transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the minimum rates set by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the applicable Prevailing Wage Determination. See http://ww
w.dir.ca.gov.

10 Last Updated 6/8/15
ARTICLE XIII CONFLICT OF INTEREST (Verbatim)
A. CONSULTANT shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with LOCAL AGENCY that may have an impact upon the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing LOCAL AGENCY construction project. CONSULTANT shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contra ct, or any ensuing LOCAL AGENCY construction project, which will follow.

B. CONSULTANT hereby certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this contract.

C. Any subcontract in excess of $25,000 entered into as a result  of this contract, shall contain all of the provisions of this Article.

D. CONSULTANT hereby certifies that neither CONSULTANT, its employees, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT providing services on this project prepared the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for any construction project included within this contract. An affiliated  firm is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint‐ ownership, or otherwise.

E. CONSULTANT further certifies that neither CONSULTANT, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT, will bid on any construction subcontracts included within the construction contract. Additionally, CONSULTANT certifies that no person  working under this contract is also employed by the construction contractor for any project included within this contract.

F. Except for subconsultants whose services are limited to materials testing, no subconsultant who is providing service on this contract shall have provided services on the design of any project included within this contract.

ARTICLE XIV REBATES, KI
CKBACKS OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION (Verbatim)
CONSULTANT warrants that this contract was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any LOCAL AGENCY employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, LOCAL AGENCY shall have the right in its discretion; to terminate the
contract without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration.

ARTICLE XV PROHIBITION OF EXPENDING LOCAL AGENCY STATE OR FEDER AL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING (Verbatim)
A. CONSULTANT certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that:

1. No state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by‐or‐on behalf of CONSULTANT to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member
of the State Legislature or United States
Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the awarding of any state or federal contract; the
making of any state or federal grant; the making of any state or federal loan; the entering

11 Last Updated 6/8/15
into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency;  a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; CONSULTANT shall complete and submit Standard Form‐LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying”, in accordance with its instructions.

B. This certification
is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required  certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C. CONSULTANT also agrees by signing this document that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower‐tier subcontracts, which  exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

ARTICLE XVI STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
A. CONSULTANT’s signature affixed herein, and dated, shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that CONSULTANT has, unless exempt, complied with,  the nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Section 8103.

B. During the performance of this Contract, Consultant and its subconsultants shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious  creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Consultant and subconsultants shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Consultant and subconsultants shall  comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 (a‐f) et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated there under (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a‐f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Divisi on 4 of Title
2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Consultant and its subconsultants shall give written notice of their obligations  under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other Agreement.

C. The Consultant shall comply with regulations relative to Title VI (nondiscrimination in federally‐assisted programs of the Department of Transportation – Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 ‐ Effectuation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Righ ts Act). Title VI provides that

12 Last Updated 6/8/15
the recipients of federal assistance will implement and maintain a policy of nondiscrimination in which no person in the state of California shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subject to discrimination under any program or activity  by the recipients of federal assistance or their assignees and successors in interest.

D. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the Agreement shall act in accordance with Title VI. Specifically, the Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex,  age, or disability in the selection and retention of Subconsultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the U.S. DOT’s Regulations, including employment practices when the Agreement covers a program whose goal is employment.

ARTICLE XVII DEBARM
ENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
A. CONSULTANT’s signature affixed herein, shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that CONSULTANT has complied with Title 2 CFR, Part 180, “OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (nonprocurement)”, whi
ch certifies that he/she or any person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, or manager, is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any federal agency; has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded, or determined ineligible by any federal agency within the past three
(3) years; does not have a proposed debarment pending; and has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past three (3) years.

Any exceptions to this certification  must be disclosed to LOCAL AGENCY.

B. Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of recommendation for award, but will be considered in determining CONSULTANT responsibility. Disclosures must indicate to whom exceptions apply, initiating agency, and dates of action.

C. Exceptions to the Federal Government Excluded Parties List System maintained by the General Services Administration are
to be determined by the Federal highway Administration. *All referenced forms and sample templates will be provided by CITY.

12/18/2020
Arup (PRIME) Aim Atlas lab CMG ICF UNICO TOTAL
Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings $ 35,098.14 $ 2,546.39 $ 1,732.50 $ 4,975.85 $ 4,104.41 $ - $ 48,457.29

1.2 Monthly status reports $ 10,739.66 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,412.29 $ - $ 15,151.96

1.3 Schedule and work plan $ 3,305.97 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,301.51 $ - $ 5,607.48

1.4 Management and coordination $ 26,804.24 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26,804.24 Task 1 Subtotal $ 75,948.02 $ 2,546.39 $ 1,732.50 $ 4,975.85 $ 10,818.21 $ - $ 96,020.97 Task
2: Data Collection and Mapping

2.1 Data review and data collection $ 1,584.83 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,584.83 Review existing environmental documentation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,034.22 $ - $ 1,034.22 Prepare preliminary environmental study form $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,991.93 $ - $ 1,991.93

2.2 Base mapping and survey $ 7,362.54 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,024.96 $ 17,387.50

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concept $ 2,573.67 $ - $ 1,547.70 $ 3,387.09 $ - $ - $ 7,508.46

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 27,346.12 $ - $ 27,346.12

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum $ 4,570.87 $ - $ - $ 3,387.09 $ 958.16 $ - $ 8,916.12 Task 2 Subtotal $ 16,091.92 $ - $ 1,547.70 $ 6,774.19 $ 31,330.42 $ 10,024.96 $ 65,769.18 Task
3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination $ 1,454.84 $ 4,325.96 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,780.80

3.2 Public awareness and notification $ - $ 18,668.89 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,668.89

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development $ - $ 4,427.14 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,427.14

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) $ 4,466.07 $ 10,865.79 $ 1,325.94 $ 2,428.75 $ - $ - $ 19,086.55

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) $ 4,857.54 $ 12,406.59 $ 3,465.00 $ 2,715.76 $ - $ - $ 23,444.89

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) $ 6,199.51 $ 14,420.27 $ 12,196.80 $ 7,050.68 $ - $ - $ 39,867.27

3.7 Experiential community “Pop-Up” event $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 3 Su
btotal $ 16,977.97 $ 65,114.65 $ 16,987.74 $ 12,195.18 $ - $ - $ 111,275.55 Ta
sk 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection $ 1,548.19 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,548.19

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation $ 10,598.15 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,598.15

4.3 Traffic modelling $ 10,862.04 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,862.04 Task 4 Subtotal $ 23,008.37 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,008.37 Task
5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals $ 4,537.54 $ - $ 17,482.08 $ 14,049.91 $ - $ - $ 36,069.54

5.2 Alternatives development $ 23,011.24 $ - $ 10,912.44 $ 52,650.61 $ - $ - $ 86,574.29

5.3 Preferred plan development $ 16,288.57 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,288.57

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) $ 28,830.61 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,830.61

5.5 City review $ 1,927.68 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,927.68

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) $ 14,975.82 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 14,975.82 Task 5 Subtotal $ 89,571.46 $ - $ 28,394.52 $ 66,700.52 $ - $ - $ 184,666.50 Task
6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strategy $ 23,865.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,865.98 Task 6 Subtotal $ 23,865.98 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,865.98 Task
7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum $ 23,855.37 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,312.11 $ - $ 25,167.48

7.2 City review $ 2,065.94 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,065.94

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum $ 12,720.59 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 12,720.59 Task 7 Subtotal $ 38,641.90 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,312.11 $ - $ 39,954.01 Ta
sk 8: CEQA / N EPA documentation

2.1 Project description $ 1,424.44 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,053.31 $ - $ 4,477.75

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption $ 2,245.05 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,665.73 $ - $ 4,910.78

2.3 NEPA - technical studies $ 1,815.92 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,815.92 Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 20,244.26 $ - $ 20,580.21 Section 4(f) documentation $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,078.50 $ - $ 13,414.45 Visual impact assessment-minor $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,037.49 $ - $ 10,373.44 Noise study - construction memo $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,193.13 $ - $ 4,529.08 Air quality - construction memo $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,633.84 $ - $ 4,969.79 Other environmental topics memo $ 335.95 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,583.74 $ - $ 3,919.69 NEPA categorical exclusion $ 779.11 $ - $ - $ - $ 867.47 $ - $ 1,646.58 Task 8 Subtotal $ 8,280.20 $ - $ - $ - $ 62,357.49 $ - $ 70,637.69 Total - Labor $ 292,385.84 $ 67, 661.04 $ 48,662.46 $ 90,64 5.73 $ 105,818.23 $ 10,024.96 $ 615,198.25 Other
Direct Costs
Postage and Delivery (at cost) $ 1,000.00 $ 200.00 $ - $ 1,200.00 Traffic data purchased from Streetlight $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Reproductions (at cost) $ 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ - $ 1,500.00 Travel (at cost) $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00
Surveys and Reports, Record Searches $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Mileage / Parking $ - $ -
Meeting & Virtual Workshop Supplies $ 400.00 $ 400.00 Printed Materials $ 1,000.00 $ 1,853.54 $ 2,853.54
Event Supplies / Equipment $ 2,200.00 $ 2,200.00
Notification Expenses $ 600.00 $ - $ 600.00
ODC Subtotal $ 13,000.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 1,853.54 $ - $ 1,700.00 $ - $ 20,753.54 Gran
d Total $ 305,385.84 $ 71, 861.04 $ 50,516.00 $ 90,645. 73 $ 107,518.23 $ 10,024.96 $ 635,951.80 OVERALL COST PROPOSAL - Capitol Mall Revitalization Project

Staff Name
and or
Classification
Dahlia Chazan,
Associate
Principal -
Project Director
Grant McInnes,
Associate
Principal -
Project Manager
Anthony
Bruzzone,
Associate
Principal
Kate White,
Associate
Principal
Mathew Bamm,
Associate
Abigail Rolon,
Associate
Megan Gee,
Senior
Consultant II
Giuliana Galante,
Senior Analyst II
Matthew Ables,
Senior Planner I
Natalia Sanabria
Vargas,
Consultant III
Joseph Kaylor,
Consultant III Engineer II BIM Technician Project Controls Dulce Gonzalez,
Project
Administration
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
195.88%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate 95 103.22 91.44 91.2 68.08 81.25 60.14 54.92 43.27 41.54 43.13 39 47 43 37.1 Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 8 66 2 30 33 139 $ 10,783.90 $ 21,123.50 $ 3,190.74 $ 35,098.14

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours 18 18 18 54 $ 3,299.76 $ 6,463.57 $ 976.33 $ 10,739.66

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours 2 8 10 $ 1,015.76 $ 1,989.67 $ 300.54 $ 3,305.97

1.4 Management and coordination Hours 60 30 90 $ 8,235.60 $ 16,131.89 $ 2,436.75 $ 26,804.24 Task Subtotal 10 152 2 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 51 293 23,335.02 45,708.64 6,904.37 75,948.02 Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours 1 2 42 9 $ 486.94 $ 953.82 $ 144.08 $ 1,584.83 Review existing environmental documentation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours 2 4 1 12 14 14 47 $ 2,262.14 $ 4,431.08 $ 669.32 $ 7,362.54

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concep
t Hours 2 4 8 14 $ 790.76 $ 1,548.94 $ 233.97 $ 2,573.67

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours 2 6 4 12 4 28 $ 1,404.40 $ 2,750.94 $ 415.53 $ 4,570.87 Task Subtotal 0 6 1 0 16 0 1 0 20 0 2 34 14 0 4 98 4,944.24 9,684.78 1,462.90 16,091.92 Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination Hours 2 4 6 $ 447.00 $ 875.58 $ 132.26 $ 1,454.84

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours 2 4 6 6 18 $ 1,372.20 $ 2,687.87 $ 406.01 $ 4,466.07

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours 2 4 6 8 20 $ 1,492.48 $ 2,923.47 $ 441.59 $ 4,857.54

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) Hours 4 6 8 6 24 $ 1,904.80 $ 3,731.12 $ 563.59 $ 6,199.51

3.7 Experiential community engagement even
t Hours
Task Subtotal 8 16 0 0 20 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 5,216.48 10,218.04 1,543.45 16,977.97 Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours 2 2 4 8 $ 475.68 $ 931.76 $ 140.74 $ 1,548.19

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours 16 43 6 56 $ 3,256.28 $ 6,378.40 $ 963.47 $ 10,598.15

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours 15 44 0 59 $ 3,337.36 $ 6,537.22 $ 987.46 $ 10,862.04 Task Subtotal 0 0 33 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 123 7,069.32 13,847.38 2,091.67 23,008.37 Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals Hours 1 1 2486 22 $ 1,394.16 $ 2,730.88 $ 412.50 $ 4,537.54

5.2 Alternatives development Hours 2 2 6 20 36 24 40 130 $ 7,070.20 $ 13,849.11 $ 2,091.93 $ 23,011.24

5.3 Preferred plan developmen
t Hours 2 1 8 10 20 16 36 93 $ 5,004.66 $ 9,803.13 $ 1,480.78 $ 16,288.57

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 1 4 20 16 40 50 50 4 185 $ 8,858.20 $ 17,351.44 $ 2,620.96 $ 28,830.61

5.5 City review Hours 2 44 10 $ 592.28 $ 1,160.16 $ 175.24 $ 1,927.68

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 2 12 16 20 20 20 4 94 $ 4,601.32 $ 9,013.07 $ 1,361.44 $ 14,975.82 Task Subtotal 6 12 16 0 66 0 64 36 46 64 0 146 70 0 8 534 27,520.82 53,907.78 8,142.86 89,571.46 Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Preliminary funding and phasing Hours 1 8 80 89 $ 7,332.82 $ 14,363.53 $ 2,169.63 $ 23,865.98 Task Subtotal 0 1 0 8 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 7,332.82 14,363.53 2,169.63 23,865.98 Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours 2 2 10 10 10 40 24 40 4 6 148 $ 7,329.56 $ 14,357.14 $ 2,168.67 $ 23,855.37

7.2 City review Hours 2 4 4 10 $ 634.76 $ 1,243.37 $ 187.81 $ 2,065.94

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours 1 2 6 4 6 20 12 20 4 2 77 $ 3,908.40 $ 7,655.77 $ 1,156.42 $ 12,720.59 Task Subtotal 3 6 16 0 18 0 16 0 60 0 36 64 8 0 8 235 11,872.72 23,256.28 3,512.90 38,641.90 Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 1 2 2 2 7 $ 437.66 $ 857.29 $ 129.49 $ 1,424.44

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption Hours 1 2 2 1 3 2 11 $ 689.79 $ 1,351.16 $ 204.10 $ 2,245.05

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 1 2 4 2 9 $ 557.94 $ 1,092.89 $ 165.08 $ 1,815.92 Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 Section 4(f) documentation Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 Noise study - construction memo Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 Air quality - construction memo Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 Other environmental topics memo Hours 1 1 $ 103.22 $ 202.19 $ 30.54 $ 335.95 NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 1 2 3 $ 239.38 $ 468.90 $ 70.83 $ 779.11 Task Subtotal 0 1 02080700036000 3 6 2,544.09 4,983.36 752.75 8,280.20 Total 27 203 70 8 158 80 152 36 126 64 121 250 92 18 71 1476 $ 89,835.51 $175,969.80 $ 26,580.53 $ 292,385.84 Other Direct Costs
Postage and Delivery (at cost) $ 1,000.00
Traffic data purchased from Streetlight $ 10,000.00 Reproductions (at cost) $ 1,000.00
Travel - Mileage (Current IRS rate) $ 500.00 Travel - Train (at cost) $ 500.00
ODC Subtotal 000000000000000 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,000.00 Grand Total $ 305,385.84
Arup US Inc.

Staff Name
and or
Classification
Outreach
Oversight
Graphics
Designer
Electronic
Communications
Designer
Project
Manager
Outreach
Coordinator Admin
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
173.59%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 57.69 $ 39.28 $ 46.47 $ 38.46 $ 26.44 Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 8 10 18 $ 846.12 $ 1,468.78 $ 231.49 $ 2,546.39

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours $ - $ - $ -

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours $ - $ - $ -

1.4 Management and coordination Hours $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 8 0 0 10 0 0 18 846.12 1,468.78 231.49 2,546.39 Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Review existing environmental documentation Hours $ - $ - $ - Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours $ - $ - $ -

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours $ - $ - $ -

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concept Hours $ - $ - $ -

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours $ - $ - $ -

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination Hours 16 12 2 30 $ 1,437.44 $ 2,495.25 $ 393.27 $ 4,325.96

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours 30 8 60 70 168 $ 6,203.34 $ 10,768.38 $ 1,697.17 $ 18,668.89

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development Hours 6 10 28 44 $ 1,471.06 $ 2,553.61 $ 402.47 $ 4,427.14

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours 19 6 40 28 93 $ 3,610.51 $ 6,267.48 $ 987.80 $ 10,865.79

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours 23 6 37 43 109 $ 4,122.49 $ 7,156.23 $ 1,127.87 $ 12,406.59

3.6 Public design charrettes (
1 ) Hours 20 10 50 50 130 $ 4,791.60 $ 8,317.74 $ 1,310.93 $ 14,420.27

3.7 Experiential community engagement event
Hour
s
0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Task Subtotal 114 30 0 209 221 0 574 21,636.44 37,558.70 5,919.51 65,114.65 Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours $ - $ - $ -
Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals Hours $ - $ - $ -

5.2 Alternatives development Hours $ - $ - $ -

5.3 Preferred plan development Hours $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours $ - $ - $ -

5.5 City review Hours $ - $ - $ -

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours $ - $ - $ -
Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -
- -
Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strategy Hours $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ -

7.2 City review Hours $ - $ - $ -

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 4(f) documentation Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Noise study - construction memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Air quality - construction memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Other environmental topics memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Total 122 30 0 219 221 0 592 $ 22,482.56 $ 39,027.48 $ 6,151.00 $ 67,661.04 Other Direct Costs
Meeting & Virtual Workshop Supplies $ 400.00 Printed Materials $ 1,000.00
Event Supplies / Equipment $ 2,200.00
Notification Expenses $ 600.00
ODC Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,200.00 Grand Total $ 71,861.04
Capitol Mall Revitalization Project
Preliminary Design And Environmental Documentation
AIM Consulting, Inc.

Staff Name
and or
Classification
Kimberly
Garza
Principal
Erik Prince
Principal
Project
Designer
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
110%
Profit
10% Total Cost

1.1 Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 32.00
Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 15 15 $ 750.00 $ 825.00 $ 157.50 $ 1,732.50

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.4 Management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 15 0 15 750.00 825.00 157.50 1,732.50 Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Review existing environmental documentation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concep
t Hours 2 5 10 17 $ 670.00 $ 737.00 $ 140.70 $ 1,547.70

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 2 5 10 17 670.00 737.00 140.70 1,547.70 Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database developmen
t Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours 7 7 14 $ 574.00 $ 631.40 $ 120.54 $ 1,325.94

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours 15 15 30 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 315.00 $ 3,465.00

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) Hours 40 40 40 120 $ 5,280.00 $ 5,808.00 $ 1,108.80 $ 12,196.80

3.7 Experiential community “Pop-Up” event Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 55 62 47 164 7,354.00 8,089.40 1,544.34 16,987.74 Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0000 - - - - Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goal
s Hours 44 60 74 178 $ 7,568.00 $ 8,324.80 $ 1,589.28 $ 17,482.08

5.2 Alternatives development Hours 24 50 32 106 $ 4,724.00 $ 5,196.40 $ 992.04 $ 10,912.44

5.3 Preferred plan development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.5 City review Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 68 110 106 284 12,292.00 13,521.20 2,581.32 28,394.52 Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strategy Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0000 - - - - Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.2 City review Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0000 - - - - Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 4(f) documentation Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Noise study - construction memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Air quality - construction memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Other environmental topics memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0000 - - - - Total 125 192 163 480 $ 21,066.00 $ 23,172.60 $ 4,423.86 $ 48,662.46 Other Direct Costs
$ -
Reproductions (at cost) $ 1,853.54
$ -
ODC Subtotal 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,853.54 Grand Total $ 50,516.00
Capitol Mall Revitalization Project
Preliminary Design And Environmental Documentation
Atlas Lab, Inc

Staff Name
and or
Classification
Willett
Moss
Principal
Jamie
Phillips
Principal
LA 4 LA2 Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs OH + Fringe
156.4%
Profit
10% Total Cost

1.564
Actual Base $ 86.54 $ 74.80 $ 52.98 $ 40.51 Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 42 7 31.449628 $ 1,764.23 $ 2,759.26 $ 452.35 $ 4,975.85

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.4 Management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 4 27 0 31.44962 8 1,764.23 2,759.26 452.35 4,975.85 Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Review existin
g environmental documentation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concept Hours 449 17.971216 $ 1,200.93 $ 1,878.25 $ 307.92 $ 3,387.09

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours 4 4 9 17.971216 $ 1,200.93 $ 1,878.25 $ 307.92 $ 3,387.09 Task Subtotal 9 9 18 0 35.94243 2 2,401.85 3,756.50 615.84 6,774.19 Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach mana
gement and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours 77 13.478412 $ 861.14 $ 1,346.82 $ 220.80 $ 2,428.75

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours 444 13.478412 $ 962.90 $ 1,505.97 $ 246.89 $ 2,715.76

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) Hours 91 31 3 35.942432 $ 2,499.89 $ 3,909.82 $ 640.97 $ 7,050.68

3.7 Experiential community engagement event Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 13 25 25 0 62.89925 6 4,323.92 6,762.61 1,108.65 12,195.18 Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 00000 - - - - Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals Hours 43 63 6 76.377668 $ 4,981.53 $ 7,791.11 $ 1,277.26 $ 14,049.91

5.2 Alternatives development Hours 13 36 108 225 381.88834 $ 18,667.78 $ 29,196.41 $ 4,786.42 $ 52,650.61

5.3 Preferred plan developmen
t Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.5 City review Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 18 72 144 225 458.26601 23,649.31 36,987.52 6,063.68 66,700.52 Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strateg
y Hours 00000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 00000 - - - - Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours 00000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.2 City review Hours 00000 $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours 00000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 00000 - - - - Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemptio
n Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 4(f) documentation Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Noise study - construction memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Air quality - construction memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Other environmental topics memo Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 0000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0000 - - - - - Total 40 110 213 225 589 $ 32,139.32 $ 50,265.89 $ 8,240.52 $ 90,645.73 ODC Subtotal 00000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total $ 90,645.73
Conger Moss Guillard, Inc

Staff Name
and or
Classification
M
Townsley
Sr
Technical
C Bromund
Sr Technical
Consultant
T Sorvari
Technical
Assistant
D Lemon
Technical
Consultant
J Severn
Technical
Assistant
C Havelaar
Technical
Consultant
E Allen
Technical
Assistant
J Ban
Sr. Technical
Consultant
T Giffen
Technical
Assistant
D Roberts
Technical
Assistant
K Stevens
Sr Technical
Consultant
A Angier
Technical
Assistant
J Volk
Sr.

Technical
Consultant
D Buehler
Sr. Technical
Consultant
J Howe
Sr. Technical
Consultant
L Yoon
Technical
Assistant
S Lin
Technical
Assistant
L Webber
Sr. Technical
Consultant
J Hughes
Technical
Assistant
J Job
Technical
Assistant
S Monzon
Technical
Assistant
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
170.74%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 95.48 $ 64.40 $ 40.62 $ 45.09 $ 28.67 $ 55.61 $ 33.65 $ 55.43 $ 41.51 $ 45.23 $ 46.58 $ 34.03 $ 55.92 $ 105.00 $ 62.06 $ 64.99 $ 41.38 $ 55.15 $ 40.70 $ 38.46 $ 41.09 Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 20 2 22 $ 1,378.18 $ 2,353.10 $ 373.13 $ 4,104.41

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours 1 19 4 24 $ 1,481.56 $ 2,529.62 $ 401.12 $ 4,412.29

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours 12 12 $ 772.80 $ 1,319.48 $ 209.23 $ 2,301.51

1.4 Management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 1 5 14 2000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 5 8 3,632.54 6,202.20 983.47 10,818.21 Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Review existing environmental documentation Hours 4 2 1 1 8 $ 347.27 $ 592.93 $ 94.02 $ 1,034.22 Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours 4 4 2 1 1 1 13 $ 668.85 $ 1,141.99 $ 181.08 $ 1,991.93

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concept Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours 0 3 9 42 70 18 58 0 6 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 12 0 246 $ 9,182.28 $ 15,677.82 $ 2,486.01 $ 27,346.12

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours 2 2 1 2 7 $ 321.73 $ 549.32 $ 87.11 $ 958.16 Task Subtotal 0 9 19 44 71 18 60 1 8 0 0 12 0 0 2 0 1 1 16 12 0 274 10,520.13 17,962.07 2,848.22 31,330.42 Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.7 Experiential community “Pop-Up” event Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 000 0000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 000 0000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.2 Alternatives development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.3 Preferred plan development Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.5 City review Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 000 0000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strategy Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 000 0000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours 2 6 2 10 $ 440.58 $ 752.25 $ 119.28 $ 1,312.11

7.2 City review Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 026 0000 000 0 2 000 000 0 0 0 1 0 440.58 752.25 119.28 1,312.11 Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 6 8 22 4 22 $ 1,025.24 $ 1,750.49 $ 277.57 $ 3,053.31

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption Hours 1 8 6 1 16 $ 895.10 $ 1,528.29 $ 242.34 $ 2,665.73

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 6 6 64 76 2 8 4 8 6 180 $ 6,797.62 $ 11,606.26 $ 1,840.39 $ 20,244.26 Section 4(f) documentation Hours 4 2 60 14 6 4 8 98 $ 4,391.50 $ 7,498.05 $ 1,188.95 $ 13,078.50 Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 1 2 50 3 8 64 $ 3,370.39 $ 5,754.60 $ 912.50 $ 10,037.49 Noise study - construction memo Hours 1 1 20 1 1 1 25 $ 1,407.97 $ 2,403.97 $ 381.19 $ 4,193.13 Air quality - construction memo Hours 1 1 2 30 1 1 36 $ 1,555.95 $ 2,656.63 $ 421.26 $ 4,633.84 Other environmental topics memo Hours 6 12 2 2 1 2 25 $ 1,203.35 $ 2,054.60 $ 325.79 $ 3,583.74 NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 2 4 6 $ 291.28 $ 497.33 $ 78.86 $ 867.47 Task Subtotal 1 35 42 64 76 2 8 50 9 60 14 10 20 1 2 2 30 1 13 12 20 472 20,938.40 35,750.22 5,668.86 62,357.49 Total 2 97 71 110 147 20 68 51 17 60 14 24 20 1 4 2 31 2 29 24 20 814 $ 35,531.65 $ 60,666.74 $ 9,619.84 $ 105,818.23 Other Direct Costs
Surveys and Reports, Record Searches (at cost) (Task A) $ 1,000.00 Postage and Delivery (at cost) (Task B) $ 200.00 Reproductions (at cost) (Task B) $ 500.00 ODC Subtotal 000 0000 000 0 0 000 000 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,700.00 Grand Total $ 107,518.23
ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.

Capitol Mall Revitalization Project
Preliminary Design And Environmental Documentation

Staff Name
and or
Classification
Rob Markes
Survey
Manager
Tim Pringle
Party Chief
Tony Perez
Rodman
Todd Jordan
Drafter
Ryan
Thornpson Sr.

Land Surveyor
Terrance
Ranney
Drone Pilot
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
135.26%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 89.00 $ 69.66 $ 67.16 $ 31.00 $ 56.00 $ 55.00 Task 1: Project Management

1.1 Meetings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.2 Monthly status reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.3 Schedule and work plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

1.4 Management and coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 2: Data Collection

2.1 Data review and data collection Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Review existing environmental documentation Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Prepare preliminary environmental study form Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 Base mapping and survey Hours 4 12 12 14 12 14 68 $ 3,873.84 $ 5,239.76 $ 911.36 $ 10,024.96

2.3 Review "The Promenade" concept Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.4 Cultural and historic resources assessment Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.5 Data collection summary memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 4 12 12 14 12 14 68 3,873.84 5,239.76 911.36 10,024.96 Task 3: Public and Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Outreach management and coordination Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.2 Public awareness and notification Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.3 Stakeholder identification and database development Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.4 Stakeholder focus meetings / interviews (6) Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.5 Steering committee meetings (3) Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.6 Public design charrettes (2) Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.7 Experiential community “Pop-Up” event Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 4: Traffic Analysis / Transportation Planning

4.1 Data collection Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle evaluation Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Traffic modelling Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -
Task Subtotal 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 5: Preliminary Urban Design

5.1 Analysis and vision goals Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.2 Alternatives development Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.3 Preferred plan development Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Draft 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.5 City review Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.6 Final 35% design submittal (preliminary engineering & cost estimate) Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 6: Funding and Phasing Strategy

6.1 Funding and phasing strategy Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 7: Preliminary Design Memorandum

7.1 Draft preliminary design memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.2 City review Hours $ - $ - $ - $ -

7.3 Final preliminary design memorandum Hours $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Task 8: CEQA / NEPA documentation

2.1 Project description Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.2 CEQA - documentation of statutory exemption Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.3 NEPA - technical studies Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 106 finding of (no adverse) effect Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Section 4(f) documentation Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Visual impact assessment-minor Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Noise study - construction memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Air quality - construction memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Other environmental topics memo Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - NEPA categorical exclusion Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Total 4 12 12 14 12 14 68 $ 3,873.84 $ 5,239.76 $ 911.36 $ 10,024.96 ODC Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Grand Total $ 10,024.96
Capitol Mall Revitalization Project
Preliminary Design And Environmental Documentation
UNICO Egineering Inc.

Arup US, Inc. Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %

66.39% 128.42% 194.81%
Profit %: 10.00% FCCM % 1.07%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base
Hourly Rate Paid
to Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing
Rate
X Associate Principal - Project Director Dahlia Chazan $95.00 $309.19 $309.19 X Associate Principal - Project Manager Grant McInnes $103.22 $335.95 $335.95 Principal Sheba Hafiz $117.79 $383.37 $383.37
Associate Principal Alfonso Mendez-Lossada $110.05 $358.18 $358.18 Associate Principal Anthony Bruzzone $91.44 $297.61 $297.61 Associate Principal Kate White $91.20 $296.83 $296.83
Associate Principal Joerg Tonndorf $90.67 $295.10 $295.10 Associate Principal Byron Thurber $89.52 $291.36 $291.36 Associate Principal $92.00 $299.43 $299.43
X Associate Abigail Rolon $81.25 $264.44 $264.44
X Associate Mathew Bamm $68.08 $221.58 $221.58
Associate $69.00 $224.57
$224.57
Associate Alexej Goehring $72.45 $235.80 $235.80
X Senior Consultant II Megan Gee $60.14 $195.74 $195.74 Senior Designer II Renee Thomas $61.44 $199.97 $199.97
Senior Analyst II Giuliana Galante $54.92 $178.75 $178.75 Senior Consultant II $56.00 $182.26 $182.26
Senior Engineer II Maribel Gibson $55.96 $182.13 $182.13 Senior Engineer II Jack Mong $67.74 $220.47 $220.47
Senior Engineer II $56.00 $182.26 $182.26
Senior Engineer II Nicole Leichtenschlag $53.17 $173.05 $173.05 Senior Engineer II Wenyu Ong $48.08 $156.49 $156.49
Senior Designer I Elif Ayalp $46.15 $150.20 $150.20
Senior Engineer I Haley Francis $51.97 $169.15 $169.15
Senior Engineer I $47.00 $152.97 $152.97
Senior Planner I Matthew Ables $43.27 $140.83 $140.83
Engineer III Luv Sehgal $43.33 $141.03 $141.03
Engineer III $43.00 $139.95 $139.95
Engineer III Zoe Temco $41.25 $134.26 $134.26
Engineer III Priya Chopra $41.35 $134.58 $134.58
Consultant III Joseph Kaylor $43.13 $140.37 $140.37
Consultant III Natalia Sanabria Vargas $41.54 $135.20 $135.20 Consultant III $43.00 $139.95 $139.95
Engineer II Brian Steele $39.33 $128.01 $128.01
Engineer II $39.00 $126.93 $126.93
Engineer II Angel Sanchez $43.70 $142.23 $142.23
Engineer II Emma Burkhardt $37.50 $122.05 $122.05
Engineer I Jinal Mehta $37.98 $123.61 $123.61
Engineer I Samantha Srinivasan $39.66 $129.08 $129.08
Engineer I Luke Abbey $33.17 $107.96 $107.96
Engineer I $0.00 $0.00
Consultant I Jessica Brown $35.10 $114.24 $114.24
BIM Technician Jodi-lyn Borghesi $48.55 $158.01 $158.01 BIM Technician $47.00 $152.97 $152.97
Project Controls $43.00 $139.95 $139.95
Project Administration Dulce Gonzalez $37.10 $120.75 $120.75 Project Administration Diane Maggi $46.52 $151.41 $151.41 Project Administration $36.00 $117.17 $117.17
Description Rate Total
Postage and Delivery (at cost) At cost $1,000.00
Traffic data purchased from Streetlight At cost $10,000.00 Reproductions (at cost) At cost $1,000.00
Travel - Mileage (Current IRS rate) Current IRS rate $500.00 Travel - Train (at cost) At cost $500.00
Capitol Mall Revitilization
T1511131004
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):

CONTRACTOR Name: 2021-07-09

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
Dahlia Chazan
Other Direct Costs
(ODC) Items and
Rates
Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall Be
Included in Cost
Proposal.

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determ ined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. T he employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipm ent including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtim e may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from com
muting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. T he Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC item s are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

AIM Consulting, Inc. Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %

38.70% 134.89% 173.59%
Profit %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing
Rate
X Outreach Oversight/Principal Gladys Cornell $57.69 $173.62 $173.62 Principal TBD $49.03 $147.56 $147.56
Technical Advisor TBD $83.07 $250.00 $250.00
Electronic Communications Designer TBD $46.47 $139.85 $139.85 Graphics Designer TBD $39.28 $118.21 $118.21
Senior Project Manager TBD $55.82 $167.99 $167.99
Project Manager TBD $38.46 $115.74 $115.74
Senior Project Coordinator TBD $33.65 $101.27 $101.27
Project Coordinator II TBD $26.44 $79.57 $79.57
Project Coordinator I TBD $24.03 $72.32 $72.32
Outreach Coordinator TBD $26.44 $79.57 $79.57
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Description Rate Total
Meeting and Virtual Workshop Supplies At cost $400.00
Printed Materials At cost $1,000.00
Event Supplies/Equipment At cost $2,200.00
Notification Expenses At cost $600.00
Capitol Mall Revitilization
T1511131004
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):

CONTRACTOR Name: 2021-07-09

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
Gladys Cornell
Other Direct Costs
(ODC) Items and
Rates
Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall Be
Included in Cost
Proposal.

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require wri tten approval from the CITY. No work shall
commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approv any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prev ailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly
rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per
prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Re gulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocatio policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

Atlas Lab, Inc Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %

30.00% 80.00% 110.00%
Profit %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing
Rate
X Principal Kimberly Garza $50.00 $115.50 $115.50
X Principal Erik Prince $50.00 $115.50 $115.50
Project Designer $32.00 $73.92 $73.92
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Description Rate Total
Reproductions (at cost) $1,853.54
Capitol Mall Revitilization
T15175100
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original): Original CONTRACTOR Name: 2021-07-09

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
Erik Prince, Principal, Atlas Lab, Inc.

Other Direct
Costs (ODC)
Items and
Rates
Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall
Be Included in
Cost Proposal.

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require wri tten approval from the CITY. No work shall
commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approv any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prev ailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly
rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per
prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Re gulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocatio policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

Conger Moss Guillard, Inc Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %

38.88% 117.52% 156.40%
Profit %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing
Rate
X Principal Willett Moss $86.54 $244.08 $244.08
X Principal Jamie Phillips $74.80 $210.97 $210.97
LA-5 Senior Landscape Architect / Senior Project Managex $60.77 $171.40 $171.40 LA-4 Project Manager / Design Lead /Tech Lead x $52.98 $149.42 $149.42 LA-3 Project Captain x $46.75 $131.85 $131.85
LA-2 Project Designer x $40.51 $114.25 $114.25
LA-1 Designer x $36.77 $103.71 $103.71
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Description Rate Total
By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

Jamie Phillips

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourl
y billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approv any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Re gulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocatio policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.

Other Direct Costs
(ODC) Items and
Rates

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall Be
Included in Cost
Proposal.
[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Original
2021-07-09
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):

CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Capitol Mall Revitilization
T15175100
CONTRACTOR Name:

ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %

35.00% 135.74% 170.74%
Profit %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base
Hourly Rate Paid
to Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing Rate
Sr. Technical Consultant Buehler, David $105.00 $312.70 $312.70 Sr. Technical Consultant Townsley, Margaret $95.48 $284.35 $284.35 X Sr. Technical Consultant Bromund, Claire $64.40 $191.79 $191.79 Sr. Technical Consultant Howe, John $62.06 $184.82 $184.82 Sr. Technical Consultant Volk, Jason $55.92 $166.54 $166.54 Sr. Technical Consultant Ban, Jennifer $55.43 $165.08 $165.08 Sr. Technical Consultant Webber, Lisa $55.15 $164.24 $164.24 Sr. Technical Consultant Stevens, Kimberly $46.58 $138.72 $138.72 Sr. Technical Consultant $105.00 $312.70 $312.70
Technical Consultant Havelaar, Christiaan $55.61 $165.61 $165.61 X Technical Consultant Lemon, David $45.09 $134.28 $134.28 Technical Consultant $55.61 $165.61 $165.61
Technical Assistant Yoon, Laura $64.99 $193.55 $193.55
Technical Assistant Roberts, Diana $45.23 $134.70 $134.70 Technical Assistant Giffen, Teresa $41.51 $123.62 $123.62 Technical Assistant Lin, Sandy $41.38 $123.24 $123.24
Technical Assistant Hughes, Jessica $40.70 $121.21 $121.21 Technical Assistant Sorvari, Tina $40.62 $120.97 $120.97 Technical Assistant Monzon, Stephanie $41.09 $122.37 $122.37 Technical Assistant Job, Jody $38.46 $114.54 $114.54
Technical Assistant Angier, Alex $34.03 $101.35 $101.35 Technical Assistant Allen, Erik $33.65 $100.21 $100.21
Technical Assistant Severn, Joshua $28.67 $85.38 $85.38 Technical Assistant $64.99 $193.55 $193.55
Description Rate Total
Reproductions at cost $500.00
Postage and Delivery at cost $200.00
Surveys and Reports (Records Search) at cost $1,000.00
Capitol Mall Revitalization
T15175100
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):Original CONTRACTOR Name: 2021-09-29

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON
SIGNATURETrina L. Fisher Contracts Administrator
Other
Direct
Costs
Estimated
ODC
Budgets
Shall Be

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly bi rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above.

Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower app roved flat hourly billing rate of the
previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution an obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard per sonal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not
limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted abo ve. CONTRACTOR shall pay
prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

UNICO Engineering Date:

X Project Name:

Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % = Combined %
135.26% 135.26%
Profit %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe or OH)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH & Profit)
Approved Flat
Hourly Billing
Rate
X Survey Manager Rob Markes $89.00 $230.32 $230.32
x Party Chief Tim Pringle $69.66 $180.27 $180.27
x Rodman Tony Perez $67.16 $173.80 $173.80
Drafter Todd Jordan $31.00 $80.22 $80.22
Sr Land Surveyor Ryan Thompson $56.00 $144.92 $144.92
Drone Pilot Terrance Ranney $55.00 $142.33 $142.33
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00
Description Rate Total
Capitol Mall Revitilization Project
T15175100
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original): Original CONTRACTOR Name: 2021-07-09

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
Cesar Montes de Oca, PE
Other Direct Costs
(ODC) Items and
Rates
Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall Be
Included in Cost
Proposal.

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require wri tten approval from the CITY. No work shall
commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approv any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prev ailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly
rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per
prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Re gulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocatio policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018
EXHIBIT 10-K CONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(Not
e: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name: AIM Consulting Inc.

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate 173.59 % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period * 01/01/2020/ - 12/31/2020
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I have r
eviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018
accounts;
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:

I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount $____$ 2,412,223.91_______________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. • The number of states in which the consultant does business is . • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is . • Audit history of the consultant’s current and prior years (if applicable) I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the Indirect Cost Rate Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.

Name**: Gladys Cornell _
Signature:

Email**: [email protected]
Title**: Principal
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 08/13/2021
Phon
e Number**: 916-442-1168
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information used to establish the indirect cost rate.

Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own Exhibit 10-K forms.

Caltrans will not process local agency’s invoices until a complete Exhibit 10-K form is accepted and approved by Caltrans Audits and Investigations.

Distribution: 1) Original - Local Agency Project File 2) Copy - Consultant
3) Copy - Caltrans Audits and Investigations
☐ Cognizant ICR Audit ☐ Local Gov’t ICR Audit ☐Caltrans ICR Audit ☒ CPA ICR Audit ☐ Federal Gov’t ICR Audit
1 16

/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW.
&RQVXOWDQW$QQXDO&HUWLILFDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP (;+,%,7. &2168/7$17$118$/&(57,),&$7,212)
,1',5(&7&2676$1'),1$1&,$/0$1$*(0(176<67(0

1RWH
 ,ID6DIH+DUERU,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWHLVDSSURYHGWKLVIRUPLVQRWUHTXLUHG 
&RQVXOWDQW¶V)XOO/HJDO1DPH

,PSRUWDQW
 &RQVXOWDQW PHDQV WKH LQGLYLGXDO RU FRQVXOWDQW SURYLGLQJHQJLQHHULQJDQG GHVLJQ UHODWHG VHUYLFHVDVDSDUW\RIDFRQWUDFWZLWKDUHFLSLHQWRUVXEUHFLSLHQWRI)HGHUDODVVLVWDQFH7KHUHIRUHWKH ,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWH
V
VKDOOQRWEHFRPELQHGZLWKLWVSDUHQWFRPSDQ\RUVXEVLGLDULHV ,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWH

&RPELQHG5DWH 25
+RPH2IILFH5DWH  DQG)LHOG2IILFH5DWH
LIDSSOLFDEOH
 
)DFLOLWLHV&DSLWDO&RVWRI0RQH\ 
LIDSSOLFDEOH

)LVFDOSHULRG


)LVFDOSHULRGLVDQQXDORQH\HDUDSSOLFDEOHDFFRXQWLQJSHULRGWKDWWKH,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWHZDVGHYHORSHG QRW
WKHFRQWUDFWSHULRG
7KH,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWHLVEDVHGRQWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶VRQH\HDUDSSOLFDEOHDFFRXQWLQJSHULRG IRUZKLFKILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDUHUHJXODUO\SUHSDUHGE\WKHFRQVXOWDQW ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKHSURSRVDOWRHVWDEOLVKDQ,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWH V
IRUWKHILVFDOSHULRGDVVSHFLILHGDERYHDQGKDYH
GHWHUPLQHGWRWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIWKDW

x $OOFRVWVLQFOXGHGLQWKHFRVWSURSRVDOWRHVWDEOLVKWKHLQGLUHFWFRVWUDWH V
DUHDOORZDEOHLQ
DFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHFRVWSULQFLSOHVRIWKH)HGHUDO$FTXLVLWLRQ5HJXODWLRQ )$5
&RGHRI
)HGHUDO5HJXODWLRQV
&)5
&KDSWHU3DUW
&)53DUW


x 7KHFRVWSURSRVDOGRHVQRWLQFO XGHDQ\FRVWVZKLFKDUHH[SUHVVO\XQDOORZDEOHXQGHUWKHFRVW SULQFLSOHVRI&)53DUW

x 7KHDFFRXQWLQJWUHDWPHQWDQGELOOLQJRISUHYDLOLQJZDJHGHOWDFRVWVDUHFRQVLVWHQWZLWKRXU SUHYDLOLQJZDJHSROLF\DVHLWKHUGLUHFWODERULQGLUHFWFRVWVRURWKHUGLUHFWFRVWVRQDOOIHGHUDOO\ IXQGHG$ (&RQVXOWDQW&RQWUDFWV
x $OONQRZQPDWHULDOWUDQVDFWLRQVRUHYHQWVWKDWKDYHRFFXUUHGV XEVHTXHQWWR\HDUHQGDIIHFWLQJWKH FRQVXOWDQW¶VRZQHUVKLS RUJDQL]DWLRQDQGLQGLUHFWFRVWUDWHVKDYHEHHQGLVFORVHGDVRIWKHGDWHRI WKLVFHUWLILFDWLRQ
,DPSURYLGLQJWKHUHTXLUHGDQGDSSOLFDEOHGRFXPHQWVDVLQVWUXFWHGRQ([KLELW$ )LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP

2XUODERUFKDUJLQJMREFRVWLQJDQG DFFRXQWLQJV\VWHPVPHHWWKHVWDQGDUGVIRUILQDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDFFRXQWLQJ UHFRUGVDQGLQWHUQDOFRQWURODGHTXDWHWR GHPRQVWUDWHWKDWFRVWVFODLPHGKDYHEHHQLQFXUUHGDSSURSULDWHO\ DFFRXQWHG IRUDUHDOORFDEOHWRWKHFRQWUDFWDQG FRPSO\ZLWKWKHIHGHUDOUHTXLUHPHQWVDVVHWIRUWKLQ7LWOH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV&RGH
86&
6HFWLRQ
E



 &)53DUW
G

&)5&KDSWHU3DUW
D




DQGDOODSSOLFDEOHVWDWHDQGIHGHUDOUXOHVDQGUHJXODWLRQV 2XUILQDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHPKDVWKHIROORZLQJDWWULEXWHV 
x $FFRXQWQXPEHUVLGHQWLI\LQJDOORZDEOHGLUHFWLQGLUHFWDQGXQDOORZDEOHFRVWDFFRXQWV 
x $ELOLW\WRDFFXPXODWHDQGVHJUHJDWHDOORZDEOHGLUHFWLQGLUHFW DQGXQDOORZDEOHFRVWVLQWRVHSDUDWHFRVW 3DJHRI
0DUFK
Arup US, Inc.
194.81

1.07 April 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020

/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW.
&RQVXOWDQW$QQXDO&HUWLILFDWLRQRI,QGLUHFW&RVWVDQG)LQDQFLDO0DQDJHPHQW6\VWHP

DFFRXQWV

x $ELOLW\WRDFFXPXODWHDQGVHJUHJDWHDOORZDEOHGLUHFWFRVWVE\SURMHFWFRQWUDFWDQGW\SHRIFRVW 
x ,QWHUQDOFRQWUROVWRPDLQWDLQLQWHJULW\RIILQDQFLDOPDQDJHPHQWV\VWHP 
x $ELOLW\WRDFFRXQWDQGUHFRUGFRVWVFRQVLVWHQWO\DQGWRHQVXUHFRVWVELOOHGDUHLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWK)$5 
x $ELOLW\WRHQVXUHDQGGHPRQVWUDWHFRVWVELOOHGUHFRQFLOHWRJHQHUDOOHGJHUVDQGMREFRVWLQJV\VWHP DQG
x $ELOLW\WRHQVXUHFRVWVDUHLQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFRQWUDFWWHUPV DQGIHGHUDODQGVWDWHUHTXLUHPHQW &RVW5HLPEXUVHPHQWVRQ&RQWUDFWV

,DOVRXQGHUVWDQGWKDWIDLOXUHWRFRPSO\ZLWK&)53DUWRUNQRZLQJO\FKDUJHXQDOORZDEOHFRVWVWR )HGHUDO$LG+LJKZD\3URJUDP
)$+3
FRQWUDFWVPD\UHVXOWLQSRVVLEOHSHQDOWLHVDQGVDQFWLRQVDVSURYLGHGE\ WKH IROORZLQJ

x 6DQFWLRQVDQG3HQDOWLHV &)53DUW
F



x) D O V H  & O D L P V  $ F W  7LWOH86&6HFWLRQV 
x 6WDWHPHQWVRUHQWULHVJHQHUDOO\ 7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ x0 D M R U  ) U D X G  $ F W  7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ $OO$ (&RQWUDFW,QIRUPDWLRQ

x 7RWDOSDUWLFLSDWLRQDPRXQW BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBRQDOO6WDWHDQG)$+3FRQWUDFWVIRU$UFKLWHFWXUDO  (QJLQHHULQJVHUYLFHVWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQW UHFHLYHGLQWKHODVWWKUHHILVFDOSHULRGV x 7KHQXPEHURIVWDWHVLQZKLFKWKHFRQVXOWDQWGRHVEXVLQHVVLV  x <HDUVRIFRQVXOWDQW¶VH[SHULHQFHZLWK&)53DUWLV  x $XGLWKLVWRU\RIWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶VFXUUHQWDQGSULRU\HDUV LI DSSOLFDEOH

܆RJQL]DQW,&5$XGLW܆RFDO*RY¶W,&5$XGLWڧDOWUDQV,&5$XGLW ܆HGHUDO*RY¶W,&5$XGLW܆3$,&5$XGLW
,WKHXQGHUVLJQHGFHUWLI\DOORIWKHDERYHWRWKHEHVWRIP\NQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIDQGWKDW,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKH ,QGLUHFW&RVW5DWH6FKHGXOHWRGHWHUPLQHWKDWDQ\FRVWVZKLFKDUHH[SUHVVO\XQDOORZDEOHXQGHUWKH)HGHUDO FRVW SULQFLSOHVKDYHEHHQUHPRYHGDQGFRPSO\ZLWK7LWOH86&6HFWLRQ E


&)53DUW&)53DUW DQG
DOODSSOLFDEOH VWDWHDQGIHGHUDOUXOHVDQGUHJXODWLRQV,DOVRFHUWLI\WKDW,XQGHUVWDQGWKDWDOOGRFXPHQWDWLRQRI FRPSOLDQFHPXVWEHUHWDLQHGE\WKHFRQVXOWDQW,KHUHE\DFNQRZOHGJHWKDWFRVWVWKDWDUHQRQFRPSOLDQWZLWKWKH IHGHUDODQGVWDWHUHTXLUHPHQWVDUHQRWHOLJLEOHIRUUHLPEXUVHPHQWDQGPXVWEHUHWXUQHGWR&DOWUDQV 1DPH

 B 7LWOH


6LJQDWXUH
 'DWHRI&HUWLILFDWLRQ
PPGG\\\\


(PDLO

 3KRQH1XPEHU



$QLQGLYLGXDOH[HFXWLYHRUILQDQFLDORIILFHURIWKHFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUVXEFRQVXOWDQW¶VRUJDQL]DWLRQDWDOHYHOQRORZHUWKDQD9LFH3UHVLGHQWD &KLHI)LQDQFLDO2IILFHURUHTXLYDOHQWZKRKDVDXWKRULW\WRUHSUHVHQWWKHILQDQFLDOLQIRUPDWLRQXVHGWRHVWDEOLVKWKHLQGLUHFWFRVWUDWH 1RWH
 %RWKSULPHDQGVXEFRQVXOWDQWVDVSDUWLHVRIDFRQWUDFWPXVWFRPSOHWHWKHLURZQ([KLELW.IRUPV &DOWUDQVZLOOQRWSURFHVVORFDODJHQF\¶VLQYRLFHVXQWLODFRPSOHWH([KLELW.IRUPLVDFFHSWHGDQGDSSURYHGE\ &DOWUDQV$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV
'LVWULEXWLRQ
 
2ULJLQDO /RFDO$JHQF\3URMHFW)LOH

&RS\ &RQVXOWDQW

&RS\ &DOWUDQV$XGLWVDQG,QYHVWLJDWLRQV
3DJHRI
0DUFK
19,417,748.00
50 18
✔
Alan Jennat
7/30/2021
CFO
[email protected] 212-896-3000

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System EXHIBIT 10-K CONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period *
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I have reviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

March 2018

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018
EXHIBIT 10-K CONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(No
te: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name:

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period *
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I ha
ve reviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018
accounts;

• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:

I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031

All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount $___________________ on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural & Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. • The number of states in which the consultant does business is . • Years of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is . • Audit history of the consultant’s current and prior years (if applicable)

I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the Indirect Cost Rate Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.

Name**: _ Title**:

Signature:

Email**:

Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):

Phone Number**:
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information used to establish the indirect cost rate.

Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own Exhibit 10-K forms.

Caltrans will not process local agency’s invoices until a complete Exhibit 10-K form is accepted and approved by Caltrans Audits and Investigations.

Distribution: 1) Original - Local Agency Project File 2) Copy - Consultant
3) Copy - Caltrans Audits and Investigations
☐ Cognizant ICR Audit ☐ Local Gov’t ICR Audit □ Caltrans ICR Audit ☐ CPA ICR Audit ☐ Federal Gov’t ICR Audit

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018

EXHIBIT 10-K CONSULTANT ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF

INDIRECT COSTS AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

(Note: If a Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate is approved, this form is not required.) Consultant’s Full Legal Name: UNICO Engineering

Important: Consultant means the individual or consultant providing engineering and design related services as a party of a contract with a recipient or sub-recipient of Federal assistance. Therefore, the Indirect Cost Rate(s) shall not be combined with its parent company or subsidiaries.

Indirect Cost Rate:

Combined Rate ______136.15 % OR
Home Office Rate % and Field Office Rate (if applicable) % Facilities Capital Cost of Money % (if applicable)
Fiscal period * 01/01/2019-12/31/2019
* Fiscal period is annual one year applicable accounting period that the Indirect Cost Rate was developed (not the contract period). The Indirect Cost Rate is based on the consultant’s one-year applicable accounting period for which financial statements are regularly prepared by the consultant.

I have reviewed the proposal to establish an Indirect Cost Rate(s) for the fiscal period as specified above and have determined to the best of my knowledge and belief that:
• All costs included in the cost proposal to establish the indirect cost rate(s) are allowable in accordance with the cost principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Part 31 (48 CFR Part 31); • The cost proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost principles of 48 CFR Part 31;
• The accounting treatment and billing of prevailing wage delta costs are consistent with our prevailing wage policy as either direct labor, indirect costs, or other direct costs on all federally- funded A&E Consultant Contracts.
• All known material transactions or events that have occurred subsequent to year-end affecting the consultant’s ownership, organization, and indirect cost rates have been disclosed as of the date of this certification.

I am providing the required and applicable documents as instructed on Exhibit 10-A.

Financial Management System:

Our labor charging, job costing, and accounting systems meet the standards for financial reporting, accounting records, and internal control adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, appropriately accounted for, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the federal requirements as set forth in Title 23 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 112(b)(2); 48 CFR Part 31.201-2(d); 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 172.11(a)(2); and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations.

Our financial management system has the following attributes:
• Account numbers identifying allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable cost accounts; • Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct, indirect, and unallowable costs into separate cost

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-K
Consultant Annual Certification of Indirect Costs and Financial Management System

March 2018
accounts;
• Ability to accumulate and segregate allowable direct costs by project, contract and type of cost; • Internal controls to maintain integrity of financial management system; • Ability to account and record costs consistently and to ensure costs billed are in compliance with FAR; • Ability to ensure and demonstrate costs billed reconcile to general ledgers and job costing system; and • Ability to ensure costs are in compliance with contract terms and federal and state requirement Cost Reimbursements on Contracts:

I also understand that failure to comply with 48 CFR Part 16.301-3 or knowingly charge unallowable costs to Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) contracts may result in possible penalties and sanctions as provided by the following:
• Sanctions and Penalties - 23 CFR Part 172.11(c)(4)
• False Claims Act - Title 31 U.S.C. Sections 3729-3733 • Statements or entries generally - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 • Major Fraud Act - Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1031
All A&E Contract Information:
• Total participation amount $ 7,000,000 on all State and FAHP contracts for Architectural &

Engineering services that the consultant received in the last three fiscal periods. . • The number of states in which the consultant does business is 1 • Years
of consultant’s experience with 48 CFR Part 31 is 7 .
• Audit history of the consultant’s current and prior years (if applicable) Cognizant ICR Audit ☐ Local Gov’t ICR Audit □ Caltrans ICR Audit ☐ CPA ICR Audit ☐ Federal Gov’t ICR Audit
I, the undersigned, certify all of the above to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I have reviewed the Indirect Cost Rate Schedule to determine that any costs which are expressly unallowable under the Federal cost principles have been removed and comply with Title 23 U.S.C. Section 112(b)(2), 48 CFR Part 31, 23 CFR Part 172, and all applicable state and federal rules and regulations. I also certify that I understand that all documentation of compliance must be retained by the consultant. I hereby acknowledge that costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement and must be returned to Caltrans.

Name**: Cesar Montes de Oca _
Signature:

Email**: President
Title**: President
Date
of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy):6/16 /2021
Phone Number**: 916 -900-6623
**An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President, a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information used to establish the indirect cost rate.

Note: Both prime and subconsultants as parties of a contract must complete their own Exhibit 10-K forms.

Caltrans will not process local agency’s invoices until a complete Exhibit 10-K form is accepted and approved by Caltrans Audits and Investigations.

Distribution: 1) Original - Local Agency Project File
2) Copy - Consultant
3) Copy - Caltrans Audits and Investigations

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-02
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: The City of Sacramento -------------------- 2. Contract DBE Goal: 11%

3. Project Description: Capitol Mall Revitalization Project Preliminary Design and Environmental Documentation

4. Project Location: Sacramento, CA ------------------------------------------

5. Consultant's Name: Arup US, Inc. 6. Prime Certified DBE: □ 7. Total Contract Award Amount: $635,951.8� ------------

8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: $330,565.96 9. Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 5 --------

10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials 11. DBE 13. DBE Certification 12. DBE Contact Information DollarSupplied Number Amount Public Outreach 35954 Gladys Cornell, AIM 71,861.04
916-442-1168 (o), 916-698-0826 (c) D
Landscape Architecture 46994 Kimberly Garza, ATLAS Labs 50,516.00 916-290-9366 (o), 916-290-9393 (d)
Land Surveying 41342 Cesar Montes de Oca, UNICO
10,024.96
916-900-6623 ( 0) 530-903-9023 ( C) D
Local Agency to Complete this Section
$ 132,402 20. Local Agency Contract
t\li1mh0r· 14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION

21. Federal-Aid Project Number:

20.82 % 22. Contract Execution
n,.1.,-
Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.
&-�/4-- 12/16/2021

23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date Grant Mcinnes 415 946-0594

25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26.Phone 17. Preparer's Name 18. Phone Associate Principal

27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original - Local Agency

2. Copy - Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

July 23, 2015
Jose Ledesma
Program Specialist
916.808.8195
March 22, 2022
03-5002F15

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit C - Page 1

EXHIBIT C
IN

SURANCE

1. Insur
ance Requirements. During the entire term of this Contract, Contractor shall maintain the insurance coverage described in the Insurance Terms below. Full compensation for all premiums that Contractor is required to pay for the insurance coverage described herein shall be included in the compensation specified under this Contract. No additional compensation will be provided for Contractor's insurance premiums. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits and coverages shall be available to the City.

Contractor's liability to the City is not in any way limited to or affected by the amount of insurance coverage required or carried by the Contractor in connection with this Contract.

2. General Liability Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance Coverage. Commercial General Liability Insurance is required providing coverage at least as broad as ISO CGL Form 00 01 on an occurrence basis for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage, and personal injury, arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor and subcontractors, products and completed operations of Contractor and subcontractors, and premises owned, leased, or used by Contractor and subcontractors, with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. The policy shall provide contractual liability and products and completed operations coverage for the term of the policy.

The Ci
ty, its officials, employees and volunteers shall be covered by policy terms or endorsement as additional insureds as respects general liability arising out of: activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor and subcontractors; products and completed operations of Contractor and subcontractors; and premises owned, leased, or used by Contractor and subcontractors.

3. Au
tomobile Liability Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance Coverage. (Check the applicable provision.)
_X_ Automobile Liability Insurance is required providing coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CA 00 01 for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. The policy shall provide coverage for owned, non-owned and/or hired autos as appropriate to the operations of the Contractor.

The Ci
ty, its officials, employees and volunteers shall be covered by policy terms or endorsement as additional insureds as respects auto liability. ___ N o au
tomobile liability insurance is required, and by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows:
“C
ontractor certifies that a motor vehicle will not be used in the performance of any work or services under this agreement. If, however, Contractor does transport items under this Contract, or this Contract is amended to require any employees of Contractor to use a

Form Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit C - Page 2 vehicle to perform services under the Contract, Contract or understands that it must maintain and provide evidence of Automobile Liability Insurance providing coverage at least as broad as ISO Form CA 00 01 for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury, with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence. The policy shall provide coverage for owned, non - owned and/or hired autos as appropriate to the operations of the Contractor.”

4. Excess Insurance . The minimum limits of insurance required above may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance coverage, provided that any umbrella or excess insurance contains, or is endorsed to contain, a provision that it will apply on a primary basis for the benefit of the City, and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its officials, employees, or volunteers will be in excess of Contractor's umbrella or excess coverage and will not contribute to it.

5. Workers’ Compensation Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance Coverage. (Check the applicable provision.)

_X_ Workers’ Compensation Insurance is required with statutory limits and Employers' Liability Insurance with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000). The Workers' Compensation policy shall include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City.

___ N o work or services will be performed on or at CITY facilities or CITY Property, therefore a Workers’ Compensation waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY is not required.

___ N o Workers’ Compensation insurance is required, and by signing this Contract, Contractor certifies as follows:

“Contractor certifies that its business has no employees, and that it does not employ anyone, and is therefore exempt from the legal requirements to provide Workers' Compensation insurance. If, however, Contractor hires any employee during the term of this Contract, Contractor understands that Workers’ Compensation with statutory limits and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) is required. The Workers’ Compensation policy will include a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City.”

6. Professional Liability Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance Coverage. Professional Liability Insurance providing coverage on a claims-made basis for errors and omissions, or malpractice with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000):

Is __x___ Is not _____ [check one] required for this Agreement.

If required, such coverage must be continued for at least 1 (one) year(s) following the completion of all Services under this Contract. The retroactive date must be prior to the date this Contract is approved or any Services are performed.

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit C - Page 3

7. Other Insurance Provisions. The policies must contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A. Contractor's insurance coverage, including excess insurance, shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, employees or volunteers will be in excess of Contractor's insurance and will not contribute with it.

B. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies will not affect coverage provided to the City, its officials, employees or volunteers.

C. Coverage shall state that Contractor's insurance applies separately to each insured against whom
claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

D. Contractor shall provide the City with 30 days written notice of cancellation or material change in the policy language or terms.

8. Acceptability
of Insurance. Insurance must be placed with insurers with a Bests' rating of not less
than A:VI. Self-insured retentions, policy terms or other variations that do not comply with the requireme
nts of this Exhibit C must be declared to and approved by the City in writing before execution of this Contract.

9. Verification
of Coverage.

A. Contractor shall furnish City with certificates and required endorsements evidencing the insurance required. Certificates of insurance must be signed by an authorized representative of
the insurance carrier.

B. Contractor shall send all insurance certificates and endorsements, including policy renewals, during
the term of this Contract directly to:

City
of Sacramento
c/o
Exigis LLC
PO Box 947
Murrieta, CA 92564
C. Certificate Holder must be listed as:

City of Sacramento
c/o
Exigis LLC
PO Box 947
Murrieta, CA 92564
D. The City may withdraw its offer of
Contract or cancel this Contract if the certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not be en provided before execution of this Contract. The City may withhold payments to Contractor and/or cancel the Contract if the insurance is canceled or Contractor otherwise ceases to be insured as required herein.

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit C - Page 4

10. S
ubcontractor Insurance Coverage . Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance coverage that meets the minimum scope and limits of insurance coverage specified in this Exhibit C.

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSR WVD

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

PRODUCER CONTACT
NAME:

FAXPHONE
(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
Y / N
N / A
(Mandatory in NH)

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence)CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GENERAL AGGREGATE $GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
$
PRO-
OTHER:

LOCJECT

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
$(Ea accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ANY AUTO
OWNED SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS

AUTOS ONLY
HIRED PROPERTY DAMAGE $AUTOS ONLY (Per accident)
$
OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $ $

PER OTH-

STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below POLICY

NON-OWNED

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORDACORD 25 (2016/03) ACORD

TM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
Continental Casualty Company
The Continental Insurance Company
New Hampshire Ins. Co.

AIU Insurance Company
National Union Fire Ins Co of PA
Berkley Insurance Company
9/20/2021
Greyling Ins. Brokerage/EPIC
3780 Mansell Road, Suite 370
Alpharetta, GA 30022
Jerry Noyola
770-220-7699
[email protected]
Arup US, Inc.
560 Mission Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
20443
35289
23841
19399
19445
32603
21-22
A X
X
X X
6057176074 04/01/2021 04/01/2022 1,000,000
1,000,000
25,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
E
X
X X
4489695 04/01/2021 04/01/2022 2,000,000
B X
X
X
X 10,000
6057264140 04/01/2021 04/01/2022 5,000,000
5,000,000
C
D N
015893748 (AOS)
015893749 (CA)
04/01/2021
04/01/2021
04/01/2022
04/01/2022
X
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
F Professional Liab AEC904343901 04/01/2021 04/01/2022 Per Claim $1,000,000 Aggregate $1,000,000
Re: Project #602308-44 - Capital Mall Revitalization. The City, its officials, employees and volunteers shall be covered by policy terms or endorsement as additional insureds as respects general liability arising out of: activities performed by or on behalf of Contractor and subcontractors; products and completed operations of Contractor and subcontractors and premises owned, leased, or used by Contractor and subcontractors are named as Additional Insureds with respects to General & Automobile Liability where (See Attached Descriptions)
City of Sacramento
c/o Exigis LLC
P.O. Box 4668, ECM-#35050
New York, NY 10168-4688
1 of 2
#S2895268/M2672086
ARUPAMERClient#: 25324
JNOY1

SAGITTA 25.3 (2016/03)
DESCRIPTIONS (Continued from Page 1)
required by written contract. Waiver of Subrogation in favor of Additional Insured(s) where required by written contract & allowed by law.
2 of 2
#S2895268/M2672086

04/01/2021
4489695

Blanket Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or
Contractors - with Products-Completed
Operations Coverage Endorsement
CNA75079XX (10-16) P
olicy No: 6057176074

Effective Date: 4/1/2018
Insured Name: Arup Americas, Inc.

Copyright CNA All Rights Reserved. Includes copyr ighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART
It is understood and agreed as follows:

I. WHO IS AN INSURED is amended to include as an Insured any person or organization whom you are required by written contract to add as an additional insured on this coverage part, but only with respect to liability for bodily injury, property damage or personal and advertising injury caused in whole or in part by your acts or omissions, or the acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf:

A. in the performance of your ongoing operations subject to such written contract; or B. in the performance of your work subject to such written contract, but only with respect to bodily injury or property damage included in the products-completed operations hazard, and only if:

1. the written contract requires you to provide the additional insured such coverage; and

2. this coverage part provides such coverage.

II. But if the written contract requires:

A. additional insured coverage under the 11-85 edition, 10-93 edition, or 10-01 edition of CG2010, or under the 10-01 edition of CG2037; or
B. additional insured coverage with "arising out of" language; or C. additional insured coverage to the greatest extent permissible by law; then paragraph I. above is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

WHO IS AN INSURED is amended to include as an Insured any person or organization whom you are required by written contract to add as an additional insured on this cov erage part, but only with respect to liability for
bodily injury, property damage or personal and advertising injury arising out of your work that is subject to such written contract.

III. Subject always to the terms and conditions of this policy, including the limits of insurance, the Insurer will not provide such additional insured with:

A. coverage broader than required by the written contract; or B. a higher limit of insurance than required by the written contract.

IV. The insurance granted by this endorsement to the additional insured does not apply to bodily injury, property damage, or personal and advertising i
njury arising out of:

A. the rendering of, or the failure to render, any professional architectural, engineering, or surveying services, including:

1. the preparing, approving, or failing to prepare or approve maps, shop drawings, opinions, reports, surveys, field orders, change orders or drawings and specifications; and

2. supervisory, inspection, architectural or engineering activities; or B. any premises or work for which the additional insured is specifically listed as an additional insured on another endorsement attached to this coverage part.

V. Under COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS, the Condition entitled Other Insurance is amended to add the following, which supersedes any provision to the contrary in this Condition or elsewhere in this coverage part:

Primary and Noncontributory Insurance
6057176074
04/01/2021

Blanket Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees or
Contractors - with Products-Completed
Operations Coverage Endorsement

CNA75079XX (10-16) Policy No: 6057176074

Effective Date: 4/1/2018
Insured Name: Arup Americas, Inc.

Copyright CNA All Rights Reserved. Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., with its permission.

With respect to other insurance available to the additional insured under which the additional insured is a named insured, this insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from such other insurance, provided that a written contract requires the insurance provided by this policy to be:

1. primary and non-contributing with other insurance available to the additional insured; or

2. primary and to not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.

But except as specified above, this insurance will be excess of all other insurance available to the additional insured.

VI. Solely with respect to the insur ance granted by this endorsement, the section entitled COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CONDITIONS is amended as follows:

The Condition entitled Duties In The Event of Occurrence, Offense, Claim or Suit is amended with the addition of the following:

Any additional insured pursuant to this endorsement will as soon as practicable:

1. give the Insurer written notice of any claim, or any occurrence or offense which may result in a claim;

2. send the Insurer copies of all legal papers received, and otherwise cooperate with the Insurer in the investigation, defense, or settlement of the claim; and

3. make available any other insurance, and tender the defense and indemnity of any claim to any other insurer or self-insurer, whose policy or program applies to a loss that the Insurer covers under this coverage part.

However, if the written contract requires this insurance to be primary and non-contributory, this paragraph

3. does not apply to insurance on which the additional insured is a named insured.

The Insurer has no duty to defend or indemnify an additional insured under this endorsement until the Insurer receives written notice of a claim from the additional insured.

VII. Solely with respect to the insurance granted by this endorsement, the section entitled DEFINITIONS is amended to add the following definition:

Written contract means a written contract or written agreement that requires you to make a person or organization an additional insured on this coverage part, provided the contract or agreement:

A. is currently in effect or becomes effective during the term of this policy; and B. was executed prior to:

1. the bodily injury or property damage; or

2. the offense that caused the personal and advertising injury; for which the additional insured seeks coverage.

Any coverage granted by this endorsement shall apply solely to the extent permissible by law.

All other terms and conditions of the Policy remain unchanged.

This endorsement, which forms a part of and is for attachment to the Policy issued by the designated Insurers, takes effect on the effective date of said Policy at the hour stated in said Policy, unless another effective date is shown below, and expires concurrently with said Policy.

6057176074
04/01/2021

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 1

EXHIBIT D
GEN

ERAL CONDITIONS

1. Indepe
ndent Contractor.

A. It i
s understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR’s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer -employee exists between the parties hereto for any purpose whatsoever. Neither CONTRACTOR nor CONTRACTOR’s ass igned personnel wi ll be entitled to any benefits payable to CITY employees. CITY is not required to make any deductions or withholdings from the compensation payable to CONTRACTOR under the provisions of this Contract, and CONTRACTOR will be issued a Form 1099 for its services hereunder. As an independent contractor, CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify and hold CITY harmless from any and all claims that may be made against CITY based upon any contention by any of CONTRACTOR’s employees or by any third p arty, including any state or federal agency, that an employer -employee relationship or a substitute therefor exists for any purpose whatsoever by reason of this Contract or by reason of the nature and/or performance under this Contract.

B. It i
s further understood and agreed by the parties that CONTRACTOR, in the performance of its obligations, is subject to the City’s control and direction as to the designation of tasks to be performed and the results to be accomplished under this Contract, but not as to the means, methods, or sequence used by CONTRACTOR for accomplishing the results.

To the extent that CONTRACTOR obtains permission to, and does, use CITY facilities, space, equipment or support services in the performance of this Contract, this use will be at the CONTRACTOR’s sole discretion based on the CONTRACTOR’s determination that the use will promote CONTRACTOR’s efficiency and effectiveness. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this Contract, the CITY does not require that CONTRACTOR use CITY facilities, equipment or support services or work in CITY locations in the performance of this Contract. As used in this Contract, "sole discretion" or "sole judgment" means that the party authorized to exercise its discretion or judgment may do so based on an unfettered assessment of its own interests, without considering how its decision affects the other party, and unconstrained by the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

C. If, i
n the performance of this Contract, any third persons are employed by CONTRACTOR, such persons will be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of CONTRACTOR. Except as otherwise provided in this Contract, all terms of employment, including hours, wages, working conditions, discipline, hiring, and discharging, or any other terms of employment or requirements of law, shall be determined by CONTRACTOR. It is further understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR wi ll issue W-2 or 1099 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for all CONTRACTOR’s assigned personnel and subcontractors.

D. The
provisions of this section wi ll survive any expiration or termination of this Contract.

Nothing in this Contract creates an exclusive relationship between CITY and CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR may represent, perform services for, or be employed by

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 2 any additional persons or companies s o long as CONTRACTOR does not violate the provisions of Section 5, below.

2. Licenses; Permits, Etc. CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that CONTRACTOR has, and shall maintain at all times during the term of this Contract at its sole cost and expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of any nature that are legally required for CONTRACTOR to practice its profession or fulfill the terms of this Contract, including a City Business Operations Tax Certificate and any required certification issued by the California Secretary of State.

3. Time. Time is of critical importance in the performance of this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall d
evote the necessary time and effort to its performance under this Contract in accordance with the standard of care. Neither party will be considered in default of this Contract, to the extent that party’s performance is prevented or delayed by any cause, present or future, that is beyond the reasonable control of that party.

4. CONTRACTOR Not A gent. Except as CITY may specify in writing, C ONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR’s personnel have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of CITY in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. CONTRACTOR and CONTRACTOR’s personnel shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind CITY to any obligations whatsoever.

5. Conflicts
of Interest. CONTRACTOR covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or will acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, that would conflict in any manner with the CITY’s interests or that would in any way hinder CONTRACTOR’s performance under this Contract. CONTRACTOR further covenants that in
the performance of this Contract, no person
having any such interest will be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor, without
the City’s written consent.

CONTRACTOR agrees to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the City’s interests during the performance of this Contract. If CONTRACTOR is or e mploys a former officer or employee of the CITY, CONTRACTOR and any former City officer or employee shall comply with the provisions of Sacramento City Code Section 2.16.090 pertaining to appearances before the City Council or any CITY department, board, commission, or committee.

6. Hazardous Substances. "Hazardous Substances" means any substance, material, waste, or other pollutant or contaminant that is or becomes designated, classified, or regulated as hazardous or toxic under any law, regulation, rule, order, decree, or other governmental requirement now in effect or later enacted. If Contractor is shipping Hazardous Substances, Contractor must supply a Safety Data Sheet ("SDS") with the first shipment of Hazardous Substances to each City location re
ceiving the Hazardous Substances. If the content of an SDS i s revised, Contractor must provide a revised SDS to each City location receiving Hazardous Substances.

7. Confidentiality of CITY Information. During performance of this Contract, CONTRACTOR may gain access to and use C ITY information regarding inventions, machinery, products, prices, apparatus, c osts, discounts, future plans, business affairs, governmental affairs, processes, trade secrets,
technical matters, systems, facilities, customer lists, product design, copyright, data, and other vital information (hereafter collectively referred to as “City Information”) that are valuable, special and unique assets of the CITY.

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 3 CONTRACTOR agrees to protect all City Information and treat it as strictly confidential, and further agrees that CONTRACTOR shall not at any time, either directly or indirectly, divulge, disclose or communicate in any manner any City Information to any third party without the City’s prior written consent.

In a
ddition, CONTRACTOR must comply with all CITY policies governing the use of the CITY network and technology systems, as set forth in applicable provisions of the City of Sacramento Administrative Policy Instructions # 30. A violation by CONTRACTOR of this section is a material violation of this Contract and shall justify legal and equitable relief.

8. CONTRACTOR Information.

A. CITY shall have full ownership and control, including ownership of any copyrights, of all information prepared, produced, or provided by CONTRACTOR under this Contract. In this Contract, the term “information” means and includes: any and all work product, submittals, reports, plans, specifications, and other deliverables consisting of documents, writings, handwritings, typewriting, printing, photostatting, photographing, computer models, and any other computerized data and every other means of recording any form of
information, communications, or representation, including letters, w orks, pictures, drawings, sounds, or symbols, or any combination thereof. CONTRACTOR shall not be responsible for any unauthorized modification or use of such information for other than its intended purpose by CITY. Notwithstanding, this Agreement does not restrict or deprive CONTRACTOR of any of its rights or proprietary interest in any materials that existed prior to or are developed independently of the performance of this Agreement (the
'Pre-Existing Materials'). If any Pre-Existing Materials are delivered in connection with or as part of the performance of CONTRACTOR'S services, the CONTRACTOR grants the CITY a non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license to use such Pre-Existing Materials to enable the full fuse and benefit of the work product.

B. CONTRACTOR shall fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers and employees, and each of them, from and against any and all claims, ac tions, lawsuits or
other proceedings alleging that all or any part of the information prepared, produced, or provided
by CONTRACTOR under this Contract infringes upon any third party’s trademark, trade name, copyright, patent or other intellectual property rights. CITY shall make reasonable efforts to notify CONTRACTOR not later than ten days after CITY is served with any such claim, action, l awsuit or other proceeding. However, City’s failure to provide notice within the ten-day period does not relieve CONTRACTOR of its obligations hereunder, which survive any termination or expiration of this Contract.

C. All proprietary and other information re ceived from CONTRACTOR by CITY, whether received in connection with CONTRACTOR’s proposal to CITY or in connection with Contractor’s performance, will be disclosed upon receipt of a request for disclosure, in accordance with the California Public Records Act; provided, however, that, if any information is set apart and clearly marked “trade secret” when it is provided to CITY, CITY shall give notice to CONTRACTOR of any request for the disclosure of such information. The CONTRACTOR will then have five days from the date it receives notice to petition the court for a protective order to prevent the disclosure of the information.

The CONTRACTOR shall have sole responsibility for defense of the actual “trade secret” designation of such information.

D. The parties understand and agree that any failure by CONTRACTOR to respond to the notice provided by CITY and seek a protective order, in accordance with the provisions of subsection C, above, constitutes a complete waiver by CONTRACTOR of any rights regarding the information designated “trade secret” by CONTRACTOR, and the

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 4 information will be disclosed by CITY in accordance with the Public Records Act.

9. Not
ification of Material Changes in Business. Contractor agrees that if it experiences any material changes in its business, including a reorganization, refinancing, restructuring, leveraged buyout, bankruptcy, name change, or loss of key personnel, it will immediately notify the City of the changes. Contractor also agrees to immediately notify the City of any condition that may jeopardize the scheduled delivery or fulfillment of Contractor's obligations to the City under this Contract.

10. Standard of Performance. CONTRACTOR shall perform in the manner and according to the standards currently observed by a competent practitioner of CONTRACTOR’s profession in California and in compliance with all requirements of this Contract. All products that CONTRACTOR delivers to CITY under this Contract must be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person currently practicing in CONTRACTOR’s profession.

CO
NTRACTOR shall assign only competent personnel to perform on its behalf under this Contract.

CONTRACTOR must notify the CITY in writing of any changes in CONTRACTOR’s staff assigned to perform under this Contract, before any performance by the new staff member . If the CITY, in its sole discretion, determines that any person assigned by the Contractor to perform under this Contract is not performing in accordance with the standards required herein, City shall provide notice to Contractor. CONTRACTOR shall immediately remove the assigned person upon receipt of the notice.

11. P
erformance or Different Terms and Conditions. The City's subsequent performance will not be construed as either acceptance of additional or different terms and conditions or a counteroffer by the Contractor, nor will the City's subsequent performance be viewed as acceptance of any provision of the Uniform Commercial Code, as adopted by any State, that is contrary to the terms and conditions contained herein. Contractor's performance shall conform to the applicable requirements of the Sacramento City Charter, Sacramento City Code, and all applicable State and Federal laws, and all the requirements of this Contract. The California Commercial Code will apply except as otherwise provided in the Contract.

12. Emerg
ency/Declared Disaster Requirements. If an emergency is declared by the City Manager, or if any portion of the City is declared a disaster area by the county, state or federal government, this Contract may be subjected to increased usage. The Contractor shall serve the City during a declared emergency or disaster, subject to the same terms and conditions that apply during non- emergency / non-disaster conditions. The pricing set forth in this Contract will apply, without mark-up, regardless of the circumstances. If the Contractor is unable to fulfill the terms of the Contract because of a disruption in its chain of supply or service, then the Contractor shall provide proof of the disruption. Acceptable forms of proof will include a letter or notice from the Contractor's source stating the reason for the disruption

13. Te
rm; Suspension; Termination.

A. Th
is Contract is effective on the Effective D ate and continues in effect until both parties have fully performed their respective obligations under this Contract, unless sooner terminated as provided herein.

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 5 B. CI
TY shall have the right at any time to suspend CONTRACTOR’s performance hereunder, in whole or in part, by giving a written notice of suspension to CONTRACTOR. Upon receipt of such notice , CONTRACTOR shall immediately suspend its activities under this Contract, as specified in the notice.

C. The
CITY shall have the right to terminate this Contract at any time by giving a written notice of termination to CONTRACTOR. Upon receipt of such notice , CONTRACTOR shall immediately cease performance under this Contract as specified in the notice. If the CITY terminates this Contract:
(1) C
ONTRACTOR shall, not later than five days after receipt of the notice, deliver all information prepared under this Contract to the City.
(2) T
he CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR the reasonable value of Goods or Services provided by CONTRACTOR before termination; provided, however, CITY shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits that might have been made by CONTRACTOR had the Contract not been terminated or had CONTRACTOR completed performance required by this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the CITY any financial information requested by the City to determine the reasonable value of the Goods or Services provided by CONTRACTOR. The foregoing is cumulative and does not affect any right or remedy that CITY may have in law or equity.

14. De
fault by Contractor. In case of default by the Contractor, the City reserves the right to procure the Goods or Services from other sources and deduct from any monies due, or that may thereafter become due to the Contractor, the difference between the price named in this Contract and the actual cost to the City to procure from an alternate source. Prices paid by the City will be considered the prevailing market price at the time such purchase is made.

15. Indem
nity.

A. Indemnity: Contractor shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify City, its officers, and employees, and each and every one of them, to the fullest extent permitted under law, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liabilities, claims, demands, losses, judgments, penalties, and expenses of every type and description, whether arising on or off the site of the work or services performed under this Contract, including any fees and costs reasonably incurred by City’s staff attorneys or outside attorneys and any fees and expenses incurred in enforcing this provision (hereafter collectively referred to as “Claims”), including Claims for personal injury or death, damage to personal, real, or intellectual property, damage to the environment, contractual or other economic damages, or regulatory penalties, that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to any negligent act or omission, recklessness, or willful misconduct related in any way to the performance of or failure to perform this Contract by Contractor, any subcontractor (including lower-tier subcontractors) or agent of Contractor, their respective officers and employees, and anyone else for whose acts of omissions any of them may be liable, whether or not the Claims are litigated, settled, or reduced to judgment; provided that the foregoing indemnity does not apply to liability for damages for death or bodily injury

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 6 to persons, injury to property, or other loss, damage, or expense, to the extent arising from the active negligence or willful misconduct of, or defects in design furnished by, City, its agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City, except when such agents, servants, or independent contractors are under the supervision and control of Contractor or any subcontractor (including lower-tier subcontractors) or agent of Contractor. While Contractor’s defense costs ordinarily cannot exceed Contractor’s proportionate percentage of fault, if one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution, the Contractor shall meet and confer with the City and other parties regarding the unpaid defense costs.

B. Insurance Policies; Intellectual Property Claims: The existence or acceptance by City of any of the insurance policies or coverages described in this Contract will not affect or limit any of City’s rights under this Section, nor will the limits of any insurance limit the liability of Contractor hereunder. This Section will not apply to any intellectual property claims, actions, lawsuits or other proceedings subject to the provisions of the Contractor Information Section, above.

C. Survival. The provisions of this section wi ll survive any expiration or termination of this Contract.

16. Fu
nding Availability.

A. Th
is Contract is subject to the budget and fiscal provisions of the Charter and the Sacramento City Code.

B. The
City’s payment obligation under this Contract will not exceed the amount of funds appropriated and approved for this Contract by the Sacramento City Council.

C. Th
is Section shall govern over any other contrary provision of the Contract.

17. Equa
l Employment Opportunity. During the performance of this Contrac t, CONTRACTOR, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest, agrees as follows:

A. Compliance With Regulations: CONTRACTOR shall comply with all state, local, and federal anti-discrimination laws and regulations, including the Executive Order 11246 entitled “Equal Opportunity in Federal Employment”, as amended by Executive Order 11375, 12086, and 13672, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR Chapter 60), referred to collectively as the “Regulations.” B. Nondiscrimination: CONTRACTOR, with regards to the work performed by it after award and before completion of the work under this Contract, shall not discriminate on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, physical handicap or sexual orientation in selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. CONTRACTOR shall not participate either directly or indirectly in discrimination prohibited by the Regulations.

C. Solicitations for Subcontractors, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In

Fo
rm Approved by City Attorney 9-1-2020 Exhibit D - Page 7 all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by CONTRACTOR for work to be performed under any subcontract, including all procurement of materials or equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by CONTRACTOR of CONTRACTOR’s obligat ion under this Contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, physical handicap or sexual orientation.

D. Information and Reports: CONTRACTOR shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or by any orders or instructions issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information and its facilities as may be determined by the CITY to be per tinent to ascertain compliance with the Regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of CONTRACTOR is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, CONTRACTOR shall so certify to the CITY, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.

E. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of noncompliance by CONTRACTOR with the nondiscrimination provisions of this Contract, the CITY shall impose any sanctions it determines are appropriate including:
(1) Wi
thholding of payments to CONTRACTOR under this Contract until CONTRACTOR complies;
(2) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of this Contract, in whole or in part.

F. Incorporation of Provisions: CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions of subsections A through E, above, in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempted by the Regulations, or by any order or instructions issued pursuant thereto. The City may direct CONTRACTOR to take specific actions to enforce these provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that if CONTRACTOR becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, CONTRACTOR may request that the CITY join such litigation to protect the City’s interests.

18. Ent
ire Agreement. This Contract, including all Exhibits and documents referenced herein, contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had before the execution of this Contract. No alteration to the terms of this Contract shall be valid unless approved in writing by CONTRACTOR, and by CITY, in accordance with applicable provisions of the Sacramento City Code.

19. Mod
ification of Contract . The Contractor shall take no direction from any City employee that changes the executed terms and conditions of the Contract, including Exhibit A , or any change that impacts the cost, price, or schedule, before receiving a written, signed modification to the Contract.

20. Severa
bility. If a court with jurisdiction rules that any portion of this Contract or its application to any person or circumstance is invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Contract will not be affected thereby and will remain valid an d enforce able as written, to the greatest extent permitted by law.