Budget and Audit Committee
May 6, 2022

Project
Description Project # Total
Budget
Available
Budget
Other Funds
#SYW_BSCC Prop. 64-2 G02001800 999,555 644,829 2009 Urban Search & Rescue G12500900 1,002,343 - 2010 Safer Grant G12902100 5,606,863 -
2010 Urban Search & Rescue G12501000 1,075,681 - 2011 Urban Search & Rescue G12501100 1,165,078 9,355 2012 Urban Search & Rescue G12501200 1,299,608 6,430 2014 AFG Wellness Grant G12902300 167,482 -
2015 SHSGP Grant G12902400 59,687 -
2015 Urban Search & Rescue G12501500 1,278,733 - 2016 AFG Source Capture Grant G12902500 723,071 7,032 2016 SHSGP Grant G12902600 60,000 7,468
2016 Urban Search & Rescue G12501600 1,395,493 13,755 2017 CHP (2017-ULWX-0028) G11017000 1,875,000 376,039 2017 SHSGP Grant Hazmat Equipment G12902700 229,190 720 2017 Urban Search & Rescue G12501700 1,237,013 41,539 2018 OTS BIKE/PED (PS18013) G11016300 75,000 3,886 2018 SHSGP Grant G12902800 83,816 36
2018 Urban Search & Rescue G12501800 1,193,990 8,684 2019 OTS STEP (PT19103) G11016219 403,304 40,483 2019 SHSGP G12902900 146,948 876
2019 UASI G11016919 2,687,750 847,921
2020 AFG COVID-19 Supplemental G12903000 467,408 318,270 2020 AFG Program G12903200 391,364 391,364
2020 OTS STEP (PT20148) G11016220 375,000 159,274 2020 Petco Lifesaving Grant G21002100 200,000 (3,684) 2020 SHSGP G12903300 19,575 19,575
2020 UASI G11016920 2,894,500 2,786,061
2020 Urban Search and Rescue G12502000 1,222,631 52,030 2021 Urban Search and Rescue G12502100 - (130,088) 59th Presidential Inauguration G12704700 19,800 7,020 African Amer Cultural Heritage G21000500 50,000 50,000 Annual Funds for CA-TF7, US&R G12501900 1,236,104 49,405 AR Floodplain & Side-Channel G14140400 7,901,124 5,870,387 AR Juvenile Salmonid & Habitat G14140700 1,305,400 1,004,950 ASP
CA Grants G21002300 4,000 -
Brownfields Revolving Loan G02180100 750,000 742,284 CARES Act Program-Creative Economy G02610113 14,302,071 - CARES Act Program-Emergency Homeless Grant G02001500 2,382,400 2,696 CARES Act Program-Great Plates Emergency Food G02610300 19,777,029 1,119,842 CARES Act Program-Homeless Response Program G02001700 8,870,142 19,338 CARES Act Program-Public Safety G02610500 2,367,188 - CARES Act Program-Sac Childcare Learn-CLASS G02610130 1,632,195 - CARES Act Program-US DOJ CESF G02610400 795,286 518,405 CA Healthy Rivers Prop 68 G14140800 5,000,000 4,951,831 CAC State and Local Partnershi G17606000 162,250 131,229 CalGRIP Safe Comm 4/10-3/12 G11007100 382,639 2,196 California Local Equity Grant G02420100 1,197,120 12 CalVIP - GPITF G02000700 3,586,704 1,725,170
CAWFC grant G21002200 15,000 9,433
CERT 2010 SHSGP Grant G12902000 75,056 -
CERT 2011 SHSGP Grant G12902200 37,700 598
Champlain Tower Collapse G12704800 116,600 (9,657) Citizens Option G11018100 776,143 776,143
City/County Fine=Fee Justice G02002000 50,000 32,129 Citywide Disaster Recovery Plan G02000800 25,000 - 316
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project # Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
Other Funds (continued)
CLG Public Outreach G21000400 27,000 6,000
Del Oro - Triple R Subsidy G19090900 12,000 12,000 ERA Program G02610600 60,537,832 8,595,325
Federal ARPA Program G02611000 112,313,331 56,156,666 FFY 2018 UASI G11016918 2,067,500 (552)
Fire FY05 Homeland Security 2541 G12901000 95,169 1 FitLot_AARP_Grant G19090800 11,030 10,675
FY2015/16 OHV Grant G11015100 24,351 -
FY2015/16 Adaptive Sports G19100400 70,967 - FY2015/16 Gang Violence Supp G11015000 1,199,584 60,991 FY2016/17 Citizen's Option Growth G11016700 294,826 (1,601) FY2016/17 City Le Grant (BSCC) G11015900 168,138 160,633 FY2016/17 OHV Program G11015118 48,037 4,780 FY2016/17 OTS - Bike/Ped G11015500 125,425 22,476 FY2016/17 WIA G19090160 216,136 -
FY2017/18 Citizen's Option G11016800 754,331 201 FY2017/18 Citizen's Option Growth G11017400 367,710 80,539 FY2017/18 JAG (2018-DJ-BX-0855) G11017500 252,397 19,646 FY2017/18 State OHMVR Grant G11015119 23,746 612 FY2018/19 - ASES - SCUSD G19041290 139,230 -
FY2018/19 Citizen's Option G11017300 761,957 128,459 FY2018/19 Citizen's Option Growth G11018000 426,297 426,297 FY2018/19 JAG (2019-DJ-BX-0685) G11017800 246,833 15,640 FY2018/19 - WIOA G19090180 137,263 -
FY2019/20 ABC Grant G11017220 100,000 27,324
FY2019/20 - ASES - SCUSD G19041310 150,925 -
FY2019/20 Citzen's Option Growth G11017920 436,881 76,951 FY2019/20 Gang Violence Supp G11017620 377,152 - FY2019/20 JAG (2020-DJ-BX-0740) G11017820 220,111 53,995 FY2019/20 S.A.V.E. Program G11012419 120,000 - FY2019/20 - WIOA G19090190 75,030 -
FY2020/21 ABC Grant G11017221 64,429 (107,969) FY2020/21 Citizens Option Growth G11018500 475,659 475,659 FY2020/21 DBW BSEE G11018300 22,001 7,273
FY2
020/21 Gang Violence Supp G11017621 383,353 88,245 FY2020/21 Go-Biz Equity Grant G02420300 1,813,613 1,121,976 FY2020/21 JAG G11017821 248,731 248,731
FY2020/21 OTS Step G11016221 385,000 172,372
FY2020/21 SAVE Grant G11012420 160,134 40,134 FY2020/21 - WIOA G19090210 51,308 -
FY2020/21-SCUSD ASES G19041320 227,502 3,533
FY2021/22 - EEMI G02002100 25,000 25,000
FY2021/22 Citizens Option G11018400 781,337 781,337 FY2021/22 Fire Prevention-Hartford G12903100 5,000 5,000 FY2021/22 Gang Violence Supp G11017622 425,660 406,045 FY2021/22 OTS STEP (PT22190) G11016222 400,000 317,448 FY2021/22-SCUSD ASES G19041330 150,926 68,695 FY2021/22 - WIOA G19090220 83,640 50,587
Gang Violence Supp - Parent G11017600 4,299 4,299 Go-Biz Equity Grant G02420200 3,831,956 79,108
HHAP Homeless Grant Program G02000950 14,178,778 54,358 HHAP II G02000960 6,454,953 6,454,953
Homeless Emergency Aid Program G02000820 2,074,365 11,428 Hurricane Delta G12704500 15,400 6,169
Hurricane Florence G12703700 1,123,200 261,266
Hurricane Harvey G12703100 1,746,400 1,153,914
317
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project # Total
Budget
Available
Budget
Other Funds (continued)
Hurricane Irma G12703200 210,000 87,075
Hurricane Isaac - IST G12702300 16,858 -
Hurricane Lane G12703500 40,800 29,244
Hurricane Maria G12703300 1,070,000 605,256
Hurricane Matthew G12703000 49,481 -
Hurricane Olivia G12703600 29,800 9,373
Hurricane Sandy - IST G12702400 41,058 -
Innovation Grant 2019 G21002000 75,000 -
Innovations Grant Program G11017700 134,186 67,179 JAG 10/08-9/12 G11006518 614,921 -
LARCP Cordova Creek FY20 G14140500 299,500 (8,313) LEAP Program G21001100 750,000 113,789
Lyons, Co Flooding G12702600 26,680 -
NEA ARP Grant G17608000 500,000 500,000
NEA Arts Collective Grant G17607000 75,000 75,000 Northeast Sacramento G02001200 300,000 (3,374) Oregon Fire G12704300 26,400 15,078
OTS FY18 STEP (PT18072) G11016200 567,331 182,357 Petco Innovation Showdown G21001800 250,000 52,999 Puerto Rico Earthquake G12704200 - (17,990) REAP 2021 G21001010 600,000 588,781
River Crossing Art Project G17605000 187,500 46,205 Sanitation Grant G02000900 150,000 -
SB 2 Planning Grant Program G21001300 625,000 57,091 SHRA IPA (B -18-MC-06-0003) G02180200 60,000 4,700 Tropical Cyclone Dorian G12704000 623,200 95,674 Tropical Cyclone Douglas G12704100 525,400 236,129 Tropical Cyclone Henri G12704900 - (9,407) Tropical Cyclone Ida G12705000 - (29,056) Tropical Cyclone Laura/Marco G12704400 30,800 162 Tropical Cyclone Zeta G12704600 15,400 3,289 Tropical Storm Barry G12703900 30,800 6,203 Tropical Storm Nate G12703400 8,274 1
UASI Homeland Security 07 11/07-6/10 G11005700 3,336,000 - US&
R-Hurricane Gustav Deployment G12701600 10,439 - USAR Moore, OK Tornado G12702500 8,347 - Youth RIV Grant FY19-23 G02001300 999,780 -
Other Funds Total 330,374,822 102,899,330
Total All F unds 337,239,530 104,278,362
318
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

EXISTING OPERATING PROJECTS

The following is a list of existing operating projects, the total budget, and available budget based on data available as of March 2022:

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
General Fund
21st Century Skills Grant Program I01000400 175,460 460 Abandoned Vehicle Legislation I80215000 1,000,000 904,317 ADA Education & Training I08000100 297,349 284,105 APP Maintenance I17000500 1,265,033 697,495 Archives East End Project I17000100 86,350 12,556 Arts and Cultural Plan I17000900 110,000 100 Arts Ed and Community Outreach I17001100 200,000 44,822 B Street Theatre I80180000 3,000,000 -
Business Capacity I02001900 350,000 -
Business Incentives Program I02001300 100,000 100,000 C19-Economic Relief I02003000 87,680 - CA Rural Legal Assistance I02000800 800,000 - Cemetery Facility Improvement I17000300 13,359 - Cesar Chavez Park Maintenance I19101200 61,925 61,925 Citywide Classification Study I08000400 3,100,000 2,737,661 Citywide Litigation Project I80310000 2,038,686 1,088,268 Citywide Strategic Plan Pjt, I02000400 1,436,091 272,316 Climate Action Initiatives I02002300 2,251,848 1,151,564 Community Outreach & Enhanced Services I02001100 200,000 27,687 Community Capacity I02002000 350,000 - Community Investment Program I02001200 90,000 - Community Nonprofit Assistance I02001000 200,000 - Community Response I23000100 3,640,889 1,262,889 CORE I02420000 2,750,000 120,779
Creative Edge I02181100 1,951,857 207,179
Crisis Intervention Training I11002200 173,002 0 Cultural and Economic Vitality I17001000 278,724 54,637 Cultural Arts Awards I17000700 2,128,000 222,126 Curtis Park Village Litigation I21005400 760,114 30,871 CW Innovation & Efficiency Assesment I01002000 268,900 - CWTP - City Manager I02002200 200,000 (100,000) Digital Equity I07001100 400,000 200,000 Downtown ESC Project I02000500 38,082 1 Electrical Safety Program I13000100 630,259 144,446 F.

O.C.A.S. (13086) I13000400 60,500 -
Fairytale Town Expansion I17006100 609,000 - Fare Free Transit for Youth I02181400 750,000 297,333 FEMA Corrective Action Plan I21004900 400,000 64,284 Fence Removal/Turf Conv Prg I14120400 100,000 97,622 Financial Empowerment I02182000 50,000 - Fleet - Community Development I06210000 1,127,302 235,466 Fleet - Convention and Cultural Services I06170000 35,951 35,951 Fleet - Fire I06120000 1,234,584 217,975
Fleet - IT I06070000 167,935 132,067
Fleet - Police I06110000 11,294,636 2,890,570 319
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
General Fund (continued)
Fleet - Public Works I06150000 2,016,992 627,312 Fleet - Office of Community Response I06020000 258,958 12,967 Fleet - Youth, Parks & Community Enrichment I06190000 914,582 165,874 Gang Prevention & Intervention - GF I02000600 5,512,857 284,646 General Plan Update I22000000 530,482 363,633 General Plan Update 4811 I22400000 6,905,212 91,174 Habitat Project I01000600 30,000 -
Historic Place Grant Program I21004800 232,999 2,149 Homeless Housing Initiative I02000200 5,348,629 489,451 Illegal Dumping I15200200 1,412,500 155,640 Impact Teams I11002400 2,836,000 514,443
Justice for Neighbors (JFN) I03000100 2,302,728 1,070,075 Laguna Libraries I19141002 130,000 -
Low Income Spay/Neuter Program I13000600 467,873 73,853 Major League Soccer I80020500 449,000 780 Marshall Hotel Hyatt Centric I18000400 3,600,000 - Mental Health Crisis I19141007 15,000 - Mental Wellness Program I11002600 568,850 248,088 NBHD Comm & Economic Plans Program I02001700 354,754 354,754 Nextgen Mobile Computer Replacement I11000100 1,291,292 - North Sacramento Ed. Investment I02180600 900,000 260,001 Northgate Blvd. PBID I02186000 68,000 68,000 Oak Park Clinic Building Maint I19101100 155,781 155,781 Oak Park Community Enhancement I19708000 200,000 17,145 Oak Park Rev. Fund Loan Prog. I02423100 1,100,000 1,100,000 OCM - Community Outreach I06420000 38,469,577 28,751,351 Participatory Budgeting Prog. I80010000 25,000 25,000 PDIT Critical Infrastructure I11002700 473,281 473,281 Police Observation Devices (PODs) I11002300 144,395 56,435 RASA Support I80005010 1,500,000 1,135,248 Respite Centers Program I23002000 3,000,000 1,149,893 Sac Zoo Relocation Study I02002100 275,000 35,118 Sacramento Riverfront I02180200 840,000 297,597 Sacramento Summer Night Lights I19141006 76,475 - SEED Co
rporation I18000200 50,083 -
ShotSpotter I11002500 452,600 21,833
Stockton Blvd Housing Development I02189010 5,000,000 - Summer Night Lights I02000700 300,000 - Summer Night Lights I11002100 600,000 - Supplemental Waste Programs I15230000 1,651,891 1,588,768 SVS Operations and Management I15001000 673,994 105,420 Thousand Strong (ETP Pilot) I01000300 2,476,000 93,428 Training and Outreach I08000300 2,107,836 1,760,322 Truth, Reform, & Recon Project I01140100 320,000 320,000 UCD Community Garden I19130000 25,000 - Utility Rate Assistance Program I14130100 16,529,526 1,297,443 Webgrant Restructuring Project I07000900 889,558 192,156 Whole Person Care I02000900 8,529,845 191,019 Wong Center Senior Housing I02189020 2,796,005 - Youth & Family Investments I02001800 2,721,000 48,310 Youth Engagement & Summer - D1 I01000110 50,000 169 Youth Engagement & Summer - D2 I01000120 50,000 4 Youth Engagement & Summer - D3 I01000130 50,000 45,500 320
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
General Fund (continued)
Youth Engagement & Summer - D4 I01000140 50,000 15 Youth Engagement & Summer - D5 I01000150 25,000 1 Youth Engagement & Summer - D6 I01000160 25,000 23,250 Youth Engagement & Summer - D7 I01000170 25,000 25,000 Youth Engagement & Summer - D8 I01000180 50,000 5 Youth Engagement Pilot Program I01000100 75,000 3,938 Youth Services Program I19140000 25,000 - G eneral F und Total 174,218,070 57,193,744
Measure U Fund
Animal Care for the Zoo & FTT I17005100 1,171,000 - CA Rural Legal Assistance I02000800 1,750,000 500,000 Children & Youth Servics Program I02001830 6,362,046 3,125,818 City Manager Youth Programs I80020800 250,000 157,076 Community Response I23000100 6,100,000 4,533,783 Creative Economy I02181100 2,640,000 2,134,611 ED Initiatives I02181000 500,000 200,650 Fare Free Transit for Youth I02181400 1,750,000 - Financial Empowerment I02182000 300,000 30,965 Fleet - Community Development I06211000 280,750 233,852 Fleet - Fire I06121000 327,731 183,924 Fleet - Youth, Parks & Community Enrichment I06191100 559,782 179,115 FY2017/18 - Summer at City Hall I80190600 183,801 1,684 FY2017/2018 Police I80110600 24,609,871 26,233 FY2019/2020 Police I80110800 37,158,244 5,554 FY2021/2022 City Attorney Office I80031000 - (5,733) FY2021/22 M/C City's Racial Equity I02004000 300,000 300,000 FY2021/22 M/C Economic Development Priorities I02180910 10,800,000 10,800,000 Gang Prevention & Intervention I02000600 2,574,377 287,134 Homeless Housing Initiative I02000200 16,569,490 3,145,173 Iceland Restoration I02181600 1,300,000 1,086,000 Illegal Dumping I15200200 2,534,500 386,861 K to College Savings Program I02181300 150,000 - LGBT Center Relocation I02181500 750,000 - Mayor's Comm on Climate Change I01001000 150,000 - NBHD Comm & Economic Plans Program I02001700 34,246 34,246 North Area Freedom Schools I02181200 290,000 - O&E Ctr Hope Coop Operations I23002000 3,000,000 - Participatory Budgeting Program I80010000 1,225,000 975,000 PDIT Critical Infrastructure I11002700 1,559,190 396,055 Police Observation Devices (PODs) I11002300 187,000 27,669 PW Sustainability Prog ram I15220300 194,000 133,952 Riverfront Properties I02180200 300,000 300,000 Sacramento Municipal Reparations Comm I01002100 200,000 200,000 Sho
tSpotter I11002500 616,608 -
Specific Plans I22000100 2,485,256 2,465,256 SPLA Maintenance I15220100 400,000 208,572 Stockton Blvd Housing Development I02189010 5,000,000 - Summer Youth and Community Program I19141000 754,353 259,453 Tenant Protection Program I21000300 89,128 - Thousand Strong (ETP Pilot) I01000300 1,161,954 634,214 Whole Person Care I02000900 1,323,000 1,322,925 Wong Center Senior Housing I02189020 703,995 - Youth & Family Invt. Pop Up I02001800 1,300,000 - Youth Sports Field-Sponsorship I19143000 370,000 370,000 Measure U F und Total 140,265,322 34,640,041
321
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
Enterprise Funds
American River Source Water I14520400 919,215 430,931 Arc Flash Hazard Analysis I14020100 1,035,630 334,773 Arts and Cultural Plan I17000900 111,000 100 Asset Management Program I14010700 457,599 457,599 City of Festivals Program-CCS I15001211 1,339,000 138,868 Combined Master Plan Program I14610300 1,578,316 903,352 Condition Assessment Program I14010800 3,749,357 2,291,992 Conjunctive Use - Groundwater Wells I14510100 774,545 653,072 CSS Management Plan I14630200 2,435,056 2,008,414 CSS Regulatory Compliance I14120600 4,393,877 313,676 CWTP - City Manager I02002200 25,000 - Drainage Master Plan Program I14710100 1,395,634 771,883 Energy Efficiency Program I14040200 300,000 300,000 ESC CTO Property Transfer Cons I02000500 47,100 - Fleet - Convention & Cultural Services CC Fund I06170100 100,000 21,793 Fleet-Department Of Utilities St orm Drain Fund I06141000 3,756,179 1,360,856 Fleet - Department Of Utilities Water Fund I06145000 5,862,623 2,048,322 Fleet - DOU Sewer Fund I06146000 6,350,805 1,762,310 Fleet - Public Works Fleet Fund I06151000 585,055 137,999 Fleet Public Works General Fund I06150000 1,138,114 1,138,114 Fleet - Public Works Solid Waste Fund I06147000 33,627,267 1,132,806 Flood Control Planning I14010100 3,500,797 1,253,633 Flow Monitoring/Hydrology Program I14610100 959,354 203,990 General Plan Future Updates I22000000 1,855 1,855 Groundwater Abandon/Protect Program I14520100 565,392 425,522 Groundwater Master Plan I14160100 510,730 37,066 Information Technology Program I14040100 3,493,730 3,337,981 Keep Our Waters Clean Outreach I14520200 35,233 27,480 Leak Detection Program I14530100 122,223 7,346 Legacy Landfill Operations I14120100 550,000 428,699 NPDES Stormwater Program I14010200 16,722,524 1,347,708 PLC Replacement Program I14050100 518,548 - Replacement Protective Relays I14050200 541,500 4 Sacramento River Source Water I14520300 1,259,544 404,052 SA
FCA Levee Maintenance I14120300 6,153,481 1,034,437 SCADA Planning Program I14010900 601,941 85,328 Sewer System Management Plan I14110100 6,489,433 1,409,503 Solid Waste Outreach I14120200 5,035,425 1,343,292 SSMP Eng/Regulatory Support I14620100 390,000 216,187 SVS Operations and Management I15001000 863,000 102,158 Sw Container Replacement I14120500 13,893,245 2,474,943 USA Waste of CA I80310000 90,000 38,964 Wastewater Planning Prog I14610200 1,294,445 669,823 Water Conservation I14120400 12,053,737 2,718,831 Water Master Plan I14510200 4,308,107 2,009,812 Water Meter Replacement Program I14010500 6,439,234 301,370 Enterprise F unds Total 156,374,851 36,086,842 Internal Service Funds
Calvine & Elk Grove Florin I80310000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Fleet - HR Risk Fund I06081000 338,300 173,570 Internal Service F unds Total 1,838,300 1,673,570 322
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
Other Funds
65th Street Impact Fee Program I06000600 993,228 49,840 Animal Services for Homeless Respite I21008500 753,230 738,947 APP Maintenance I17000500 276,462 149,198 Arden Gateway I21006100 935,027 438,512 ARPA Homelessness and Housing I80611000 8,861,664 8,861,664 ARPA Small Business Support I02612000 8,200,000 6,118,580 ARPA Youth Workforce Training I02612020 1,550,000 1,550,000 Arts and Cultural Equity Grant I17000600 500,000 14,988 Arts and Cultural Facilities I17000200 743,272 33,764 Arts Ed and Community Outreach I17001100 366,048 72,381 Basin 6 Drainage I22200600 4,850,724 25,356 Bonded CFD/AD Applications I22310100 2,131,401 (331,114) BRLF Program Income I02180800 1,586,401 1,462,974 Building Compliance Unit Night Team I21000400 389,844 372,538 CARES Act Program-Economic Relief I02003000 10,148,449 - Centene Emp Incentive I02180100 8,100,000 8,100,000 Central City Fee District I06132110 100,000 25,167 City Hall Tech Program I02001500 500,000 229,803 Citywide Strategic Plan Pjt, I02000400 20,000 - College Square Reimbursement I22310200 30,000 13,800 Community Response I23000100 10,830,434 9,530,434 Convention Center - Complex Review I21006000 2,283,696 887,938 CORE Capital Loan Program I02420000 - (200,000) Council-Led Strategic Init. I01002200 550,000 550,000 County COVID-19 Testing & Vaccination I12000100 398,363 72,354 Creative Economy Pilot Project I18000300 500,000 14,431 CSHR Team I21000500 205,683 205,683
Cultural and Economic Vitality I17001000 36,000 35,000 Cultural Plan Implementation I17000900 29,880 29,880 D1-Youth Workforce Program I19142000 389,726 159,627 Downtown ESC Project I02000500 6,078,917 - Downtown Plaza Hotel I21005200 103,533 103,533 Emergency Shelter Response I23002000 2,240,290 - ESC Art Maintenance I17000400 289,516 214,516 ESC
Building Project I21005100 1,690,153 1,690,153 F.O.C.A.S. (13086) I13000400 3,455,503 890,520 Financial Empowerment I02182000 855,000 114,307 Fleet - Community Development L&L Fund I06212000 89,700 89,700 Fleet - Public Works Gas Tax I06152100 1,997,276 807,555 Fleet - Public Works General Fund I06150000 509,890 509,890 Fleet - Public Works L&L Fund I06152000 893,153 357,234 Fleet - Public Works Solid Waste Fund I06147000 260,000 260,000 Forgivable Loan Program I02180400 2,000,000 1,751,250 FY2017/18 - SUMMER AT CITY HALL I80190600 11,600 - Gang Prevention & Intervention I02000600 1,507,500 1,500,000 General Plan Update 4811 I22400000 2,790,241 - General Plan Update (new ) I22000000 15,512,840 6,202,685 Gobler-Park Trust Cold Storage I17009100 32,500 32,500 Grant High School Quadrangle I02187000 200,000 200,000 Hart Trust Project Fund - FY22-26 I19122000 871,580 840,364 Hart Trust Project Fund FY12-16 I19120000 - - Health & Wellness Program I08000200 3,000 3,000 323
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Av ailable
Budget
Other Funds (continued)
Historic Place Grant Program I21004800 238,000 21,834 Homeless Housing Initiative I02000200 21,984,820 79,769 Illegal Dumping I15200200 2,425,660 669,071 Inclusive Economic Development I02180900 500,000 204,000 JCPA Administrative Control 3131 I22205100 653,869 96,930 Kids Play Mc Kinley Maintenance 4711 I19000800 12,870 7,151 Labor Contract Costs I80612000 9,893,510 9,893,510 Marshall Environmental I18000400 200,000 - MBI I02180700 995,400 695,400
MLS Stadium Fees I80020500 1,800,000 651,102 MLS-Community Development I21006200 1,140,240 170,604 N Natomas Admin Control I22200100 9,217,932 326,973 N Sacramento Code Enforcement Outreach I21000600 450,000 450,000 Natomas Central CFD 2006-02 I22340000 100,000 55,692 Natomas Crossing Office I I21005700 523,822 523,822 Natomas Landing CFD2008-01 I22310500 64,500 55,221 Natomas Meadows CFD I22310000 62,000 42,329 Neighborhood Park Maintenance CFD 4815 I22300000 570,556 52,685 NNAC&CC Feasibility Study Project I19000900 161,167 2,309 Non-Bonded Service District Appeals I22300100 781,486 60,213 Oak Park Broadway I02180300 3,867,500 110
Old Sacramento Improvements I02612030 5,000,000 4,194,476 Panhandle Annexation 4811 I22209000 124,990 3,466 PBID/BIA Applications I22310600 45,000 20,824 Project Pony 2112 I11001900 6,600 5,202 Public Records Staffing I11002800 898,385 898,385 RAILS Grant Program I18000100 4,970,709 2,687,714 Railyards Block 48 I21006300 849,461 393,584 Railyards Fee District I06132100 95,000 72,856 Regional Community Policing In I11001600 49,871 3,545 River District Fee District I06132120 50,000 21,664 Sacramento Canopy Hotel I21006400 439,890 368,041 Sacramento Commons I I21005900 728,585 387,916 Sacramento Econ Gardening 3yr I02184000 1,247,000 551,900 Sac
ramento Ent. Dev. Academy Ph1 I02183000 1,875,000 1,628,006 Sacramento IEDC I02612040 3,500,000 3,500,000 Sacramento Railyards 2006 FINP I22208000 740 1 Sacramento Riverfront I02180200 17,000 4,621 SMUD Rehab I21005600 462,562 356,037
SPD Training Facilit y 2157 I11002000 46,700 58 Stockton Blvd Housing Development I02189010 - 10,000,000 Stockton Blvd Specific Plan I22000100 1,100,000 25,621 TMA Shuttle I22200700 1,318,200 192,000
Traffic Impact Study Guideline I15161700 100,000 39,361 Transportation Planning MYOP I15221700 250,000 233,053 UCD Community Garden I19130000 25,000 102 Utility Box Artwork Project I17000800 86,948 29,509 Vaccine Outreach and Education I02612050 1,000,000 - Wastewater Planning Prog I14610200 73,000 28,001 Whole Person Care I02000900 62,815,795 4,366,752 Willowcreek Fee District I22206000 3,759,498 474,385 Wong Center Senior Housing I02189020 - 3,500,000 Youth & Family Investments I02001800 1,300,000 1,300,000 Other Funds Total 255,530,991 104,124,757
Total All Funds 728,227,533 233,718,954
324
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

EXTERNALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS

The following is a list of existing externally funded programs, the total budget, and available budget based on data available as of March 2022:

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Available
Budget
General Fund
PHSC Reserve Funding E18000400 160,000 38,190
Powerhouse Science Center E18000400 3,000,000 600,000
Railyards Mediation E02000100 110,500 7,478
Railyards Project Management E02000100 496,353 263,450
General Fund Total 3,766,853 909,118
Driver Training Acadmy (SRDTA) E08000100 1,639,000 515,602 Robla Facility Safety Training E08000200 1,500 1,500
Externally Funded Programs Fund Total 1,640,500 517,102 Other Funds
Academy Activities 7/07-6/11 E11002200 1,003,859 100,599 Board of Supervisors E17000500 22,000 1,700 CA TF7 Mobex 2022 E12000200 150,000 150,000
County Support-Holiday Music E17000900 60,000 - DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 407,067 320,235 Federal Forfeiture - DOJ E11007000 43,450 270 Federal Forfeiture - DOJ E11007018 35,273 2,070 Federal Forfeiture - DOT E11006900 12,243 8,289 Federal Forfeiture - Justice E11008300 55,653 44,246 Federal Forfeiture - Treasury E11008200 87,920 87,920 Federal Forfeiture - DOJ E11003300 2,573,648 -
Federal Forfeiture - DOT E11003200 1,099,987 13,396 FY2014/15 AB109/RCISP E11006400 147,080 76,115 FY2014/15 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 323,889 - FY2016/17 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 580,433 - FY2016/17 Los Rios Vocational Training E11006500 581,767 (99) FY2017/18 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 347,349 - FY2018/19 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 391,452 - FY2019/20 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 519,709 (12,155) FY2019/20 Los Rios Vocational Training E11006500 526,972 - FY2019/20 PODs Arden Fair E11007122 42,500 42,500 FY2020/21 DMV Anti-Auto Theft E11005400 435,190 - FY2020/21 Los Rios Vocational Training E11006500 614,244 - FY2021/22 Auto Theft (9250.14 VC) E11005400 550,000 330,534 FY2021/22 Los Rios E11006500 750,000 179,107
FY2021/22 State Forfeiture - Health & Safety E11008000 460,764 119,449 FY2021/22 State Forfeiture - Drug & Gang E11008100 83,388 83,388 FY2021/22 US DOJ Forfeiture E11008300 47,072 47,072 FY2021/22 USDT Forfeiture E11008200 419,719 261,031 Los Rios Vocational Training E11002500 5,848,744 680 Los Rios Vocational Training E11006500 647,886 647,886 Phoenix Park PODs E11007125 36,685 7,328
PODs - Arden Fair Association E11007118 68,000 4,193 PODs - Housing Authority E11007127 19,850 19,850 Internal Service Funds
325
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Project
Description Project #
Total
Budget
Available
Budget
Other Funds (continued)
PODs - Jackson Lab E11007120 48,256 19,367
PODs - MO Florin West E11007121 9,000 115 PODs - Stockton Blvd Partnership E11007119 13,820 1,205 PODs - The Cove E11007124 36,700 8,797
PODs MO Capital Nursery E11007123 6,000 - PODs Providence Place E11007126 16,657 3,249 Police Observation Devices E11007100 98,712 6,372 Powerhouse Science Center E18000400 5,450,000 400,000 SAR-Smart Growth Program E01000100 15,000 - SMUD Gallery - CY2014-16 E17000500 125,000 -
SMUD Gallery 2019-2021 E17000500 75,000 51,000 State Forfeiture - Health & Safety E11008000 534,965 236,658 State Forfeiture - Health & Saftey E11002800 4,415,816 198 State Forfeiture - Health & Saftey E11006718 1,089,722 176,164 State Forfeiture Drug & Gang Prevention E11006800 43,039 25,721 State Forfeiture Drug & Gang Prevention E11006818 191,920 1,320 State Forfeiture Drug & Gang Prevention E11008100 160,136 145,554 State Forfeiture Drug Education & Gang Prevention E11002900 831,867 7,375 Vocational Educational Training - Fire E12000100 5,589,675 447,424 Wings of the City Restoration E17001000 83,900 - Other Funds Total 37,828,978 4,066,123
Total All Funds 43,236,331 5,492,343
326
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

28 SECTION - 28
Financial Policies
327
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

328
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Budget Control Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents
Purpose
Background
Policy

3.1 Annual Budget Development

3.2 Budget Amendments

Related Regulatory References
Council Motion 2016-0121

Effective Date: April 26, 2016

329
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Budget Control Policy

1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to ensure the City makes informed fiscal decisions that take into account the full costs, in terms of dolla rs and service impacts, of implementing spending incr eases during the fiscal year. To maintain a structurally balanced budget, any spending increases must be accompanied by compensatory revenue increases or spending decreases that clearly identify the associated opportunity costs.

2. BACKGROUND
The service plan for the City is based on an annual budget as required by the City Charter and by good financial and operat ional practices. Budgeting on an annual basis provides time to review all revenue sources, develop solutions to previously identified pr oblems, and to discuss and decide on policies and priorities. An annual budget process also provides time for management to plan and more efficiently and effectively im plement changes incorporated into the budget. Making significant mid-cycle chan ges outside of the orderly budget process can lead to poor decision-making due to incomplete information and to inefficient and ineffective operations or service delivery.

3. POLICY

3.1 Annual Budget Development:

The annual budget process will be the method used by the City to develop its service delivery priorities and the leve l and type of resources required to fund those services.

Before the City undertakes any changes that would create fixed ongoing expenses, the cost implications of such changes will be projected for current and future years.

3.2 Budget Amendments:

Changes to the budget and to service levels during the fiscal year will be minimized.

Changes during the fiscal year will generally be limited to technical adjustments, emergency funding, unforeseen circumstances, time-s ensitive opportunities or issues, or new grants or awards. The creation of a new program, a higher service level, or other increases in expenditu res, without associat ed revenues or reimbursements, during mid-budget cycle is discouraged. Changes outside of the annual budget process should only be considered during the midyear budget review.

Unexpected revenue shortfalls or other significant issues that may create a budget shortfall during the fiscal year ar e to be reported to the Council with recommendations by the City Manager as to whether a midyear budget adjustment should be made.

Budget amendments shall be considered and adopted by the Council except for where authority has been delegated as prescribed within the adopted Budget Resolution.
330
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Debt Management Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Office of the City Treasurer
(916) 808-5168
[email protected]

Table of Contents

Regulatory References
Council Resolution 2021-0156

Effective Date: June 01, 2021

331
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Debt Management Policy

1. Introduction

1.1 Background. The City of Sacramento (the “ City”) has a long history of issuing multiple types of debt and working with various residents, businesses, developers, and government agencies to achieve the most-effective financing solutions for necessary capital projects and capital improvements. Debt issuance is one way of financing these projects and improvement s in a cost-efficient manner while maintaining generational equity. With its limited fiscal resour ces, the City will continue to explore the issuance of debt as an equitable means of meeting its infrastructure needs.

1.2 Purpose. This Debt-Management Policy (this “Policy”) sets forth the principles and objectives that should guide the City’s decisions to issue debt, and it establishes guidelines for responsibly managing debt. The core objectives of this Policy include the following:
(A) Minimize costs of debt service and issuance.
(B) Maintain access to cost-effective borrowing.
(C) Achieve and maintain the highest prac tical credit ratings of the various bond and credit types as well as the City’s overall credit rating. (D) Balance pay-as-you-go fi nancing with debt financing. (E) Ensure full and timely repayment of debt.
(F) Maintain full financial and non-financia l disclosure and reporting with respect to debt and associated credit ratings.
(G) Ensure compliance with federal, st ate, and local laws and regulations. (H) Promote the City’s best interests and protect the City’s financial stability when deciding whether to approve debt and how to structure the debt. (I) Maintain internal-control procedures to ensure that the pr oceeds of each debt issuance are directed to the intended use.
(J) Increase transparency to debt stakeholder s and consistency in debt decision making.
332
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

1.3 Scope of Application. This Policy applies to debt issued or incurred by the City, the Sacramento City Financing Authority, the Sacramento Public Financing Authority, and the Redevelopment Agency Successor A gency; to debt the City issues on behalf of assessment districts and community facilities districts; and to debt the City issues for third parties (i.e., conduit financing) (collectively, “City Debt”). From time to time, however, compelling or extraordinary circumstances may arise that require the City Council, at the recommendation of the Cit y Treasurer or the Debt Manager within the City Tr easurer’s Office (the “Debt Manager ”), to make an exception to this Policy. Certain obli gations of the City—such as Other Post- Employment Benefits and debt not involving the issuance of bonds or other long- term obligations—are not subject to this Policy.

2. Governing Authority, Points of Contact, and Responsibility

2.1 Authority. The City’s debt program for all City funds must be operated in conformance with applicable federal, state, and other legal requirements, including authorizing sections of the City Charte r and the City Code, and the various covenants of the City’s outstanding debt obligations.

2.2 Delegation of Authority . The City Council assigns it s responsibility for managing and coordinating all activities related to the structure, issuance, and post-issuance management of all City Debt to the City Treasurer’s Office.

2.3 Point of Contact. The City Treasurer and the Debt Manager are responsible for maintaining communication to the bond mark et on the City’s behalf, with a policy of full disclosure. This includes communication with rating agencies, investors, and other debt-related service providers about the City’s financial condition; the financial condition of enterprise funds that secure revenue bonds; and the relevant financial information of community facilities districts or assessm ent districts that secure special-tax or assessment bonds, as applicable. As necessary, the City Treasurer or the Debt Manager will seek guidance from the City Attorney’s Office and the City’s disclosure counsel on t he appropriateness of disclosing certain matters.

2.4 Responsibilities. Debt obligations may not be pr esented to the City Council for authorization without a joint assessm ent and recommendation by the City Manager’s Office and the City Treasurer’s Office. City departments that propose debt-financed capital programs or small-equipment acquisitions must work in close coordination with the City Treasurer’s Office, the City Manager’s Office, the City Attorney’s Office, and the City Finance De partment by providing information to facilitate the feasibility analysis and due- diligence process before the issuance of debt. In drafting bond-issuance documents and other related matters, the following roles serve as general guidance. Roles for a particular financing may differ slightly. 333
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(A) The City Treasurer’s Office—
(1) is responsible for selecting the st ructure, timing, me thod of issuance (public vs. private pl acement, negotiated vs. competitive sale), and other terms of debt issuance;
(2) serves as the primary contact between the City and rating agencies, investors, and all other market participants;
(3) manages non-attorney members of th e financing team (see section 4.6, “Professional Assistance”);
(4) leads the development of all necessary financing documents; (5) presents the financing structure and financing documents to the City Council for approval;
(6) manages the investment of debt proceeds and bond-reserve funds; (7) manages compliance with post-iss uance requirements, including continuing-disclosure requirements (in accordance with the Supplemental Policy on Disclosure) , private-activity analysis and remediation, and arbitrage requirements; and
8) conducts periodic reviews of this Po licy and brings forward to the City Council any proposed amendments.
(B) The City Manager’s Office and appropr iate City Departments under the City Manager’s purview—
(1) identifies and prioritizes projects through the City’s multi-year capital- improvement program;
(2) identifies sources of funds for payment of debt service; (3) identifies sources of funds for project operations and maintenance; (4) participates in document preparation and review;
(5) participates in conference calls or meetings regarding the debt, e.g., due-diligence reviews, rating-agency presentations, investor relations; 334
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(6) provides timely information as needed to comply with post-issuance requirements, including tracking expenditures of debt proceeds to comply with arbitrage requirements and annual reporting requirements; and
(7) notifies the City Treasurer’s Office before the City ent ers into (a) any agreements that qualify as “debt obligations” under SEC Rule 15c2-12, such as loans from non-City lenders, equipment leases, and grants; and (b) any amendments of such loans, leases, and grants.
(C) The City Attorney’s Office—
(1) provides independent verification of the City’s compliance with all applicable laws and regulations;
(2) selects, retains, and manages outsi de legal counsel to assist with debt financing (e.g., bond counsel, disclosure counsel);
(3) protects the City’s interests;
(4) participates in document preparation and review; and (5) participates in conference calls or meetings regarding due-diligence review.
(D) The City Council—
(1) takes this Policy into account w hen, it authorizes the issuance or incurrence of City Debt;
(2) reviews and approves this Policy and, if necessary, reviews and considers the approval of recommendations to amend this Policy brought forward by the City Treasurer’s Office; and
(3) reviews and, if appropriate, appr oves supplemental policies that address various debt and financin g instruments (if additional supplemental policies are adopted, then an amended version of Attachment A reflecting those policies must be attached to this Policy).

3. Capital Financing Considerations

3.1 Constraints. New-money debt will affect the long-term affordability of all 335
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

outstanding and planned debt; the maintenance and operating costs of debt- financed improvements will also affect the City’s budget. (A) The pledge of repayment implicit in the issuanc e of debt means that any future issuance of debt is limited; hence, when assessing the financial feasibility of financing a planned project or purchase, the City Council must consider (1) the total of all outstanding debt, including overlapping debt and the planned debt; (2) the City’s needs for special projects that benefit City constituents; (3) any feasibility report that has been prepared for the financing in accordance with section 3.3(A) or 3.3(B) below; and (4) whether issuing debt to finance the planned proj ect or purchase will necessitate reductions in the number and types of programs and services the City provides or reductions in the number of City employees. (B) Additionally, the necessary main tenance and operating costs of debt- financed projects will constrain the City’s budgetary flexibility and should be considered alongside debt capacit y when evaluating any proposed financing.
(C) Finally, debt issuances should be coor dinated with the City’s overall capital- improvement program and budget process to the extent possible.

3.2 Debt Capacity . The City’s ability to issue new -money debt is constrained by federal and state laws and regulations, the City Char ter and the City Code, and the covenants of existing debt. The City Trea surer’s Office shall work to ensure that the City Council and t he City Manager are aware of outstanding debt levels and of the ramifications if additional new-money debt is issued, including the additional financial constraints the City may face. As needed, the City Treasurer’s Office may perform debt-capacity analyses, with assistance by one of the City’s underwriters and one of t he City’s municipal advisors, to evaluate the long-term effects of debt issuance in relation to the City’s objectives.

3.3. Feasibility. To ensure consistency with this Policy, the City Council shall not undertake or authorize debt—parti cularly new-money debt—without an assessment and recommendation of the City Manager’s Office and the City Treasurer’s Office.
(A) General-Fund or Lease-Revenue B onds. In conjunction with the City Treasurer’s Office, the City’s Department of Finance shall prepare, for each long-term financing that will be supported by the general fund, an internal feasibility analysis (formal or informal) of the effect on current and future budgets and the City’s overall credit ra ting of the debt and the costs of operating the financed capital projects. This analysis may be performed formally or informally and must also address the reliability of revenues to 336
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

support debt service. Total annual debt service for all general-fund bonds and lease-revenue bonds, in each year they are outstanding, must not exceed 6% of annual budgeted general-fund revenues net of revenues that City departments generate by providing serv ices directly chargeable to City residents and businesses. Examples of such department revenues include the Fire Department’s advanced life-supp ort fee, the Police Department’s alarm-permitting fee, and the Community Development Department’s building permit and general plan fees. See the City Fee Database. (B) Special Revenues. In c onjunction with the City Treas urer’s Office, the City’s Department of Finance shall prepare, for each long-term financing that will be supported by special revenues, an internal feasibility analysis (formal or informal) that identifies the effect of both the financing and the operating costs of the financed capital projects on the City’s current and future budgets and the City’s overall credit rating. This analysis must also address the reliability of revenues that support debt service. Projected revenues from the transient- occupancy tax (Sacramento City Code ch apter 3.28) must equal or exceed 175% of annual debt service for senior obligations and 115% of annual debt service for subordinate obligations. Pr ojected revenues from a community facilities district must equal or exceed 110% of the sum of annual debt-service and administration costs in each year the debt is outstanding. (C) Enterprise Funds. The City Manager’s Office and the City Treasurer’s Office shall evaluate the affordability of new-money debt for enterprise funds.

Enterprise rate levels must fully cover debt-service requirements and debt- service-coverage ratios as outlined in the applicable debt covenants, as well as the anticipated costs of operating, maintaining, and administering the capital improvements financed by the debt. At the time of debt issuance, the projected net system revenues of the enterprise fund should be sufficient to maintain a coverage ratio equal to or greater than 120% for parity obligations and bonds and 100% for aggregate parit y, subordinate, and unsecured obligations. The ability to afford new debt for enterprise o perations will be evaluated as an integral par t of the City’s process for reviewing and setting rates for utilities services.
(D) Conduit Financing by a Joint-Powers Authority. The City may agree to the issuance of bonds by various joint-powers authorities (e.g., Association of Bay Area Governments, California Statewide Community Development Authority, California M unicipal Finance Authority). When the City is not the issuer of bonds for a project within the City, the City’s policy will be to require the issuer to assume full responsibility for issuance and on-going compliance of the bond issue with federal and stat e laws. When feasible, the City may hold the public hearing required by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1986 (26 U.S.C. § 147(f)(2)) but is not required to do so. 337
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(E) City-Issued Conduit Financing. In rare instances, the City Treasurer’s Office may determine that it is in the City’s best interest to issue bonds on behalf of another governmental entit y or a 501(c)(3) corpor ation within the City’s boundaries. In these instances, neither the City’s general fund, nor the City’s other funds, nor the City’s taxing power will be pledged for repayment of the bonds. In addition, the City will rely on the financial analysis provided by the governmental entity or the 501(c)(3) corporation for purposes of due-diligence review before moving forward on the request to issue debt. The City’s preferred method for issuing conduit debt is conduit financing by a joint- powers authority.
(F) Small-Equipment Lease Financing. The City may move forward with a small- equipment lease financing at the r equest of City departments after analysis and due-diligence review by the City M anager’s Office, the City Department of Finance, and the City Treasurer’s Office. Requests from City departments must demonstrate the need (e.g., legal , environmental, cash flow) for small- equipment lease financing, and the City dep artments must provide realistic, projected drawdown schedules showing that borrowed funds will be spent in accordance with requirements of the Internal Revenue Service (the “ IRS”).

The City Treasurer’s Office will determine whether additional disclosure will be required at the time the financing is entered into and will make the decision based on consultation with the City’s disclosure counsel.

3.4 Capital Expenditure Considerations. The City will consider the following factors to evaluate pay-as-you-go financing versus debt financing for funding capital expenditures:
(A) Factors favoring pay-as-you-go.
(1) Projected revenues and fund bal ances are adequate a nd available to complete the project, or the project can be completed in phases. (2) Existing debt levels might adversely affect the City’s credit ratings or ratings outlook.
(3) Market conditions are unfavorable or present difficulties in marketing the proposed debt.
(4) The project’s useful life is less than five years.
(5) Debt financing would be the pref erred method, but circumstances require delaying the financing.
(B) Factors favoring debt financing.
338
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(1) Current and projected revenues avail able for debt service are sufficient and reliable so that financings can be marketed with investment-grade credit ratings.
(2) Market conditions present favo rable interest rates and demand for the City’s financings.
(3) The project is mandated by feder al or state law, by court or administrative order, or by a settl ement related to a lawsuit or administrative action, and current resources are insufficient or unavailable to fund the project fully within the time required. (4) The project is immediately needed to meet or relieve capacity needs or emergency conditions, and current resources are insufficient to fund the project fully within the time required.

4. Debt Issuance

4.1 Types and Purposes of Debt.
(A) Long-Term Debt. Long-term new-money debt may be used only to finance capital improvements, such as the co sts of acquiring or improving land, infrastructure, facilities, or equipment, and only if it is appropriate to spread these costs over more than one budget year. Long-term new-money debt may also be used to fund capitalized interest, costs of issuance, required reserves, and any other financing-related costs that may be legally capitalized. Long- term new-money debt may not be used to fund City operating costs or to fund services or programs. The final maturity of long-term debt should not exceed 40 years. The following are the types of long-term debt that may be undertaken by the City:
(1) Special-Tax Revenue Bonds. Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, c odified at Government Code sections 53311 to 53368.3 (the “Mello-Roos Act”), the City may use special-tax bonds to finance the construction or acquisition of various public improvements. The Mello-Roos Act provides an efficient means of financing certain public capital faci lities and services and promotes economic development in areas that lack sufficient infrastructure, such as infill or brownfield areas. B onds may be issued to fund capital facilities so long as the estimated usef ul life of the facilities is at least five years. These bonds must be approved by at least two-thirds of the qualified electors within the CFD.
(2) Marks-Roos Bonds . Under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 339
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

1985, codified at Government C ode sections 6584 to 6599.3 (the “Marks-Roos Act”), governmental entities, in consort with or as part of a joint-powers authority, may use a “pooled” financing technique for a broad array of public capital impr ovements. The City has used the Marks-Roos Act to issue refund ing bonds for community facilities districts as well as for two rede velopment project areas when new- money debt was issued concurrently. Voter approval is not required. (3) Special-Assessment Bonds. The Improvement Act of 1911 and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 author ize the City to form assessment districts for imposing special-assessment liens on properties within the districts, with the assessment on each property calculated according to the “special benefit” the property receives from the improvements. The assessments are then used to secure payment of bonds that amortize the improvement costs over a period of years. A majority of the property owners within the district that ar e subject to the assessment must approve both the formation of the district and the issuance of the bonds.

Approval occurs through submissi on of assessment ballots weighted according to the amount of eac h property’s proposed assessment.

Importantly, for some improvements the “general benefit” may outweigh the “special benefit”; if so, then the usefulness of special-assessment bonds to finance the improvements will be diminished.
(4) Property and Business Improvement District Bonds. Under the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, codified at Streets and Highways Code sections 36600 through 36671, bonds may be issued to finance capital improvements wit h repayment of the bonds from assessments levied on the real property or businesses that benefit from the improvements financed.
(5) General-Obligation Bonds. Thes e bonds may be issued by governmental entities that have the legal authority to levy ad valorem property taxes and other charges at whatever rate and amount is necessary to pay the debt. Under article XVI, section 18, of the California Constitution, these bonds may only be issued with two-thirds voter approval.
(6) Tax-Allocation Bonds. Until Januar y 2012, the City was authorized to issue new-money tax-allocation bonds or tax-allocation revenue bonds (“TABs” or “TARBs”) that were secured by a pledge of tax-increment revenues from project areas managed by a redevelopment agency.

Proceeds from TABs and TARBs were used to revitalize blighted and economically depressed areas and promote economic growth. The City is no longer to issue new-money TABs or TARBs unless the City or its related financing authorities are awar e of enforceable obligations that 340
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

need to be met. Only refunding TABs are now authorized, and only the Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency of the City of Sacramento may issue them.
(7) Certificates of Participation and Lease-Revenue Bonds. These debt instruments are secured by a le ase-leaseback arrangement between the City and another public entity. The City uses its general operating revenues (which are not expressly pl edged) to pay rent owed under a lease. The payments are in turn used to pay debt service on lease- revenue bonds issued by a joint-power s authority or on certificates of participation executed and delivered by a trustee. Voter approval is not required because these debt instruments are not subject to the debt limit in article XVI, section 18 of the California Constitution. The City Council must annually appropriate funding fo r the payment of debt service associated with these types of debt instruments as part of the approval of the City’s budget.
(8) Revenue Bonds. These bonds are payable from revenue generated by a City enterprise, such as water and wastewater utilities. Because debt service on revenue bonds is paid sole ly from enterprise revenues and is not secured by any pledge of tax or general fund revenues, these bonds are not subject to t he debt limit in article XVI, section 18 of the California Constitution. Revenue bonds are used for the improvements to the enterprise and are paid by ratepayers that benefit from the service provided by the enterprise.
(9) State Revolving Fund Loans or Other Similar D ebt Instruments. An example is the Infrastructure Stat e Revolving Fund Program, which provides financing to public agenc ies and non-profit corporations sponsored by public agencies; the loan proceeds are used for a variety of infrastructure and economic-development projects. Often the cost of borrowing through the loan programs is lower than the cost of issuing debt in the public market, but the fi nal maturity of the loan may be limited. Additionally, the process to obtain a loan may take longer than publicly issued bonds. Though generally less cost effective than a loan, bonds may afford financing for proj ects with a need for expedited schedules.
(B) Short-Term Debt . Short-term debt may be used as an interim source of funding before the issuance of long- term debt. It may be issued for any governmental purpose for which long-term debt may be issued, including the payment of capitalized interest and other financing-related costs; it may also be used to address legitimate short-term cash-flow requirements during a given fiscal year, so that the City may continue to fund the operating costs of providing necessary public services; and it may be used to bridge the gap in 341
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

financing before long-term debt is issued to meet the ongoing capital needs of a project or series of projec ts. The City will not engage in short-term borrowing solely for the purpose of generating investment returns (arbitrage).

Short-term debt usually may not exceed five years.
(1) Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (“TRANs ”). These are short-term notes used to cover cash shortfalls resulting from a mismatch between the timing of revenues and expenditures. The City may issue TRANs when needed to meet general-fund cash-flow needs in a fiscal year.

TRANs are secured by the property taxes and other revenues received later in the fiscal year. Voter approv al is not required. Federal tax regulations often require that TRANs be repaid in the fiscal year in which they are issued to cover short-term cash-flow shortfalls. (2) Bond Anticipation Notes (“ BANs”). These are short-term interest- bearing notes issued in the anticipat ion of long-term bond issuances.

The City may issue BANs as a source of interim financing when the City Treasurer determines that doing so is prudent and advantageous to the City. Voter approval is not required.
(3) Lease-Purchase Financings. These financings may be used for the short-term financing of essential equipment. The term of a lease- purchase agreement is typically less than 10 years but may be as long as 15 years. Under this type of financing, the City and a bank enter into a master lease agreement for the lease-purchase of equipment up to a certain aggregate amount. The City and the bank then enter into separate “schedules of property” or “lease schedules” for each lease- purchase of equipment, and the City Council annually budgets and appropriates an amount sufficient to pay rent for the equipment under lease during that year; the failure to appropriate will result in termination of the lease-purchase agreement and the potential acquisition by the bank of the financed equipment. Voter approval is not required. (4) Commercial Paper Notes. These notes serve as a cash-management tool used primarily to provide s hort-term interim funding of capital expenditures that will ultimately be funded from a long-term bond or loan. Commercial-paper notes can reduce a project’s overall interest costs because only the amount needed for interim funding is borrowed, and interest rates on the interim funding are lower than the rates on the “permanent” funding with long-term bonds or loans. As of the date of this Policy, the City has never iss ued commercial paper notes, but the need for this type of short-term financing could arise in the future. (C) Other Debt. There may be special circumstances when other forms of debt are appropriate; these will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. 342
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(D) Refunding. The City Treas urer’s Office will periodically review outstanding City Debt to identify refunding opportunities and evaluate the costs and benefits of restructuring or retiring outstanding obligations. Refunding will be considered (within federal tax-law c onstraints) when it will provide a net economic benefit or when it is needed to achieve City objectives relating to necessary changes in restrictive co venants, call provisions, operational flexibility, tax status, the issuer, debt-service pr ofile, etc. The City may purchase City Debt in the open market for the purpose of retiring the debt when doing so is cost effective.
(1) Only one type of refunding transaction is allowed: a “current refunding,” which is when outstanding bonds are paid off within 90 days after the proceeds of refunding bonds are deposited into an escrow account with the escrow agent (typically the same entity as the trustee). (2) In general, when the City undertake s a current refunding for net economic benefit, the refunding should produce net-present-value debt- service savings of at least 5%. This 5% threshold is a goal rather than a requirement, as the City may have reasons to refund an issue that generates net-present-value savings of less than 5% (e.g., the refunding will eliminate unduly restrictive debt covenants) or conversely aim for a higher targeted minimum level of savings.
(3) (3) The City may also issue taxabl e bonds to advance refund tax-exempt bonds with an optional redemption dat e more than 90 days after the proceeds of the taxable bonds are av ailable. Whether the City moves forward with an advance refunding wil l depend on several factors, and the City Treasurer’s Office will work with one of the City’s municipal advisors to evaluate advance-refunding scenarios. In general, the goal will be a net-present-value savings of at least 5%, but this is not required.
(4) When, during periods of economic distress, the City Council determines that annual debt service (i.e., princi pal and interest payments) for an outstanding issue of bonds might e xceed available revenues, the City may issue new bonds to refund and re structure the outstanding bonds even though the net-present-value sa vings are negative. Annual debt service on the refunding bonds would be lower than debt service on the refunded bonds in the first few years of the refunded bonds, but the term of the refunded bonds might extend bey ond the term of the refunded bonds, thereby increasing overall total interest costs.

4.2 Public Policy Discussion. The proceedings to issue debt for projects that are controversial or of high public interest should be conducted with full transparency and public discussion (e.g., through comm unity meetings, pub lic outreach, City Council meetings).
343
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

4.3 Reimbursement of City Expenditures. If the City intends to reimburse itself from proceeds of tax-exempt debt for City expenditures m ade before issuance of the debt, then City staff must bring forward to the City Council, as soon as is practicable and in accordance with 26 C.F.R. § 1.150-2, a resolution declaring the City’s official intention to reimburse itself.

4.4 Method of Sale. Except to the extent a competitive process is required by law, the City Treasurer is responsible for determining the appropriate way to offer City Debt to investors. A negotiated sale is preferred because it (A) provides the City more flexibility in determining the structure, time, and date of the sale, which is advantageous in a volatile municipal-bond market; (B) permits the schedule for the issuance and sale of bonds to be expedi ted when necessary to meet the City’s goals; and (C) affords the chosen underwriter or senior managi ng underwriter (in the case of an underwriting syndicate) greater opportunity to pre-market the City Debt to potential purchasers, including local investors, before the sale—all of which contributes to the City’s goal of achieving the lowest overall cost of borrowing. Other methods of sale, such as competitive sale and private placement, may be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, private-placement debt may be appropriate when pending litigat ion or other risks or ma rket conditions make a competitive or publicly negotiated sale difficult.

4.5 Pooled Financing. The City Treasurer is responsible for determining the appropriate use of third-party “pools” to issue City Debt. The current preferred method of sale is a direct issuance by the City led by one senior managing underwriter or co-senior managing underwriters. The appropriateness of pooled financing depends on the par amount of bonds to be issued, the complexity of the financing, and the need for greater bond-market penetration (insti tutional, retail, and high-net-worth individuals).

4.6 Professional Assistance. The City Treasurer may periodically select and retain service providers (other than bond and disclosure counsel, which the City Attorney’s Office selects and retains) as needed to meet legal requirements and obtain specialized analytical services that facilitate the issuance of City Debt by minimizing borrowing costs. The City Tr easurer will make these sele ctions with the goal of achieving an appropriate balance between service (including experience, professional reputation, and market recognition) and cost. The City Treasurer may select service providers through a sole-source process of his or her choosing unless a competitive or other process is required by law or this Policy.

5. Debt Structure Features

5.1 Debt Repayment
(A) Useful Life. City Debt must be st ructured so that th e weighted average 344
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

maturity of the proposed debt is less t han or equal to the weighted average economic or useful life of the capital projects or improvements to be financed. (B) Level Debt Service Preferred. To the extent possible, the structure of debt- service for long-term debt other than special-tax revenue bonds should have combined annual principal and interest payments that remain relatively constant to maturity, i.e., “level debt service.” But in some circumstances non- level debt service may be to the City’s advantage or is the norm—such as in the case of Special Tax Revenue B onds where debt service increases by about 2% annually. The City Treasurer’s Office will determine the structure of the debt at the time of borrowing after considering pricing, cash flows, and other relevant factors and after cons ulting with the underwriter of the proposed debt and one of the City’s municipal advisors.

5.2 Credit Quality . The City should obtain and maintain the highest possible credit ratings when issuing short-term and long-t erm debt and will only issue bonds, for itself or others, that have a credit rating of “investment grade” or higher.1 The City will, however, consider the issuance of non-rated land-secured bonds issued through assessment districts or community facilities districts, as well as the issuance of other non-rated bonds if circumstances warrant. The City will not seek a rating for bonds unless the City Treasurer’s Office determines that the bonds are likely to receive an underlying (i.e. unenhanced) rating of BBB or higher.

5.3 Credit Enhancement. The City Treasurer’s Office will work with one of the City’s municipal advisors and with t he underwriter of t he proposed City Debt (or senior managing underwriter, if there is an underwriting syndica te) to analyze the costs and benefits of obtaining bond insurance on a maturity-by-maturity basis for the debt.

5.4 Non-Cash Reserve and Reduced Reserve . The City Treasurer’s Office will work with one of the City’s municipal advisors and with the underwriter of the proposed City Debt (or senior managing underwriter, if there is an underwriting syndicate) to analyze the costs and benefits of having no reserve, obtaining a surety reserve policy, or modifying the three-prong reserv e test (26 C.F.R. § 1.148-2(f)(2))—for example, to 50% of maximum annual debt service or 10% of outstanding principal.

5.5 Fixed-Rate Debt. The City’s preferred interest-rate mode is fixed rate.

5.6 Variable-Rate Debt. The City may issue variable-rate debt—i.e., debt that pays interest at a rate that varies accordi ng to a pre-determined formula or specified

 For Moody’s Investor Service, “investment grade” means a rating of P‐3 or higher for short‐term debt  and  Baa3 or higher for long‐term debt. For Standard & Poor’s, “investment grade” means a rating of A‐3 or  higher for short‐term debt and BBB– or higher for long‐term debt. And for Fitch Rating s, “investment  grade” means a rating of F‐3 or higher for short‐ term debt and BBB– or higher for long‐term debt.
345
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

index or results from a periodic remark eting of the debt. Although the City might benefit from variable-rate debt in some tr ansactions, issuing variable-rate debt passes an unknown obligation and risk to future City Councils.

5.7 Derivatives. Derivatives might be appropriate for certain City borrowing programs.

For example, derivatives may be used in connection with the issuance of variable- rate debt. The City Treasurer’s Office will evaluate the use of derivatives on a case by-case basis to determine whether the potential benefits are sufficient to offset any potential costs and whet her the derivatives are co nsistent with federal and state law and financially prudent.

5.8 Call Provisions. The City Treasurer’s Office will determine the call provisions for City Debt at the time of pricing, mindful that call provisions may affect the interest of potential investors and the price of the bonds. The City’s preferred structure is optional redemption at par to maintain flexibility for future refunding opportunities.

The City will not issue non-callable debt unle ss it is legally required or unless market conditions dictate otherwise; non-callable debt should not be issued solely to generate additional debt-service savings.

5.9 Bond Size. Unless otherwise directed by the City Treasurer in consultation with the City Manager, the minimum amount the Cit y will finance through the issuance of bonds is $10 million unless circumstances justify a lower amount. The City may pursue other financing mechanisms—such as pay-as-you-go financing, inter-fund borrowing, lines of credit, and lease financ ing—for debt less than $10 million. In the case of Special Tax Revenue Bonds, special circumstances may exist that warrant the City Treasurer’s considerat ion of the developer’s request to issue bonds in an amount less than $ 10 million (e.g., if the bonds are for an infill or brownfield development project). The City Treasurer will det ermine whether to move forward with a debt financing with small par amount.

6. Debt Administration and Regulatory Compliance

6.1 Policies and Procedures for Post-Issuance Compliance . The City Treasurer’s Office must maintain written policies and procedures that require compliance with debt covenants and with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The policies and procedures must address continuing-d isclosure requirements; arbitrage- rebate requirements, privat e-use limitations, other tax-compliance requirements; levy enrollment and administration; de linquency and foreclosure management; debt service and other payments; and permitted investments and uses of debt proceeds.

6.2 Arbitrage Compliance. The City Treasurer’s Office is responsible for keeping all records needed to comply with federal arbitrage requirements for tax-exempt debt. (A) For each bond issue, the City Treasurer ’s Office will pay required rebate 346
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

amounts, if any, no later than 60 days after each five-year anniversary of the issue date of the bonds and no later than 60 days after the last bond of the issue is redeemed.
(1) During the construction of eac h capital project financed with debt proceeds, the City’s arbitrage consultant will typically prepare an interim arbitrage-rebate report at least once every 12 months until all proceeds deposited in the project fund hav e been expended; if, however, the proceeds remaining in the project f und are equal to or less than 5% of the proceeds deposited, then the City Treasurer’s Office may have the arbitrage consultant pr epare the interim arbi trage-rebate reports according to the timeframe required by IRS regulations. (2) After the construction proc eeds have been fully expended or the balance in the project fund has fa llen below 5% of the proceeds deposited, the City’s arbitrage cons ultant will prepare an interim arbitrage-rebate report on each five-yea r anniversary of the issue date of the bonds, or more frequently if warranted.
(B) During the term of each issue plus thr ee years, the City Treasurer’s Office will retain copies of all arbitrage repor ts, records relating to the use and investment of tax-exempt proceeds, documentation of private use, and other relevant documents associated with the i ssue. If the issue is refunded, then the retention period for the refunded i ssue is the life of the refunding issue plus three years. Training may be provided for all personnel working on the IRS’s post-issuance-compliance process. If any potential violations to complying with federal tax laws are discovered, then the City Treasurer or the Debt Manager, after consulting with t he City Attorney’s Office, will contact bond counsel and determine what, if any, corrective actions are needed (e.g., participation in the IRS’s Voluntary Closing Agreement Program). (C) The City Treasurer or the Debt M anager will periodically review the City’s post-issuance compliance policies and procedures and will implement revisions as appropriate after consulting with the City Attorney’s Office and, if needed, bond counsel and disclosure counsel.
(D) When bonds (the refunding bonds) ar e issued to refund outstanding bonds (the refunded bonds), all remaining proceeds of the refunded bonds—e.g., all amounts remaining in the project fund, reserve fund, and other accounts, plus accrued interest—will be considered for purposes of IRS regulations to be “transferred proceeds” of the refunding bonds and, as such, will be subject to the arbitrage calculations for the refunding bonds. In addition, if the transferred proceeds represent more than 5% of the original deposit in the project fund of proceeds from the refunded bonds (see section 6.2(A)(1) above), then interim arbitrage calcul ations must be performed on an annual 347
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

basis until the balance of the transferr ed proceeds is less than 5% of the original deposit at whic h point the arbitrage calc ulations will be completed every five years from the issuance date of the refunding bonds.

6.3 Use of Proceeds from Tax-Exempt or Tax able Debt and of Assets Financed with Tax-Exempt Debt. The City Treasurer’s Office in conjunction with other City departments is responsible for the following:
(A) Monitoring the use of proceeds from tax-exempt and taxable debt and the use of assets financed or refinanced with tax-exempt debt throughout the term of the debt to ensure compliance with all covenants and restrictions in the documents relating to the debt and to ens ure that the proceeds are directed to the intended use.
(B) Consulting with the City Attorney ’s Office and bond counsel in reviewing contracts or other arr angements involving use of assets financed or refinanced with tax-exempt taxable debt to ensure compliance with all covenants and restrictions in the documents relating to the debt. (C) Maintaining records for any contracts or other arrangements involving the use of assets financed or refinanced with tax-exempt debt.
(D) Maintaining internal-control proc edures related to the management and disbursement of proceeds, such as pr ocedures requiring that proceeds are either (1) held by a third-party trust ee or fiscal agent, which will disburse the proceeds to, or upon the or der of, the City in acco rdance with one or more written requisitions; or (2) held by the City and deposited and accounted for in a separate fund or account, with wit hdrawals and expenditures carefully documented.
(E) Consulting promptly with the City Attorney’s Office and bond counsel to develop a course of action to remediat e any identified existing or potential violations of restrictions on the use of tax-exempt or taxable proceeds or the use of assets financed or refinanced with tax-exempt or taxable proceeds.

348
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Attachment A
Supplemental Policies
City of Sacramento Policies and Procedures For Use of Special Assessment and Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Financing For Infrastructure, Public Facilities, Programs and Services (Adopted on June 29, 1993, by Resolution No. 93- 381, updated on August 9, 1994, by Resolution 94-491 and on May 15, 2012) City of Sacramento Development Fee Financing Progra m for Commercial, Industrial and Residential Development Projects (Adopted January 1997 by Resolution No. 97- 002)
California Debt and Invest ment Advisory Commission Appraisal Standards for Land- Secured Financings CDIAC 04-07 (Adopted in May 1994 and revised in July 2004) City of Sacramento Debt-Management Policy – Supplemental Policy on Disclosure (Adopted on June 2, 2011, by Resolution No. 2011-322 and updat ed on February 7, 2017, by Resolution No. 2017-0046; on June 19, 2018, by Resolution No. 2018-0251; on April 23, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-0122; and on December 10, 2019, by Resolution No. 2019-0453); on June 30, 2020, by Resolution No. 2020-0189; and on June 1, 2021, by Resolution No. 2021-0156)

349
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

350
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Debt Management Policy - Disclosure
Supplemental Policy on Disclosure

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Office of the City Treasurer
(916) 808-5168
[email protected]

Table of Contents

Regulatory References
Council Resolution 2021-0156

Effective Date: June 01, 2021

351
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Debt Management Policy - Disclosure

1. Introduction

1.1 This Supplemental Policy on Disclosur e governs the City’s discharge of its disclosure obligations related to debt (including lease-revenue obligations) issued by or obtained by the City or by relat ed entities such as the Sacramento City Financing Authority, The Sacramento Public Financing Authority, and the Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency.
(A) The City and its related entities issue obligations in the public capital markets from time to time. When bonds are issued, the City, whether acting for itself or for a related entity, is obligated to disclose all material information in compliance with federal securities laws, including the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 10b- 5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and Rule 15c2-12 of the SEC. California Governm ent Code sections 8855 and 53359.5 require certain disclosures to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission and Government Code se ctions 12463.2, 53891, 53892, 53892.2, and 53892.3 require certain discl osures to the California State Controller’s Office.
(B) Incomplete, inaccurate, or misleadi ng disclosure might have material financial consequences for the City and Cit y officers and employees. For example:
 The SEC could bring civil actions charging that disclosure was negligent, reckless, or intentionally fraudulent; in addition, the SEC could refer cases to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.
 The SEC could impose cumbersome procedures and oversight on the City as conditions for settling civil actions.
 The City could suffer adverse publicity, which might reduce market access.
 The credit rating on the City’s debt could be downgraded, resulting in increased costs in future issuances.
 City officials could face personal fines for violations of securities laws. (C) Sound disclosure practices can provide both tangible and intangible benefits, including the following:
 Enhanced credibility in the municipal-bond marketplace.  Transparency with rating agencies, investors, and prospective investors.
 Improved decision making for prospective investors.
352
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Increased numbers of investors w ho purchase the City’s bonds in the primary and secondary markets.
 Demonstrated City commitment to providing timely disclosure to investors, credit-rating agencies, and the public.
 The potential for a lower overall cost of borrowing.

1.2 Scope of Policy. This policy applies to City information and document, including the following, that a reasonable investor would consider significant or useful when deciding whether to invest in the City’s bonds:
(A) Initial-disclosure docum ents, i.e., preliminary, and final official statements. (B) Continuing-disclosure documents, i.e., annual financial information and event notices.
(C) Miscellaneous reports and presentations to the public.

2. Governing Authority, Point of Contact, and Responsibility

2.1 Authority. Either the City Treasurer or the Debt Manager within the City Treasurer’s Office (the “ Debt Manager ”) shall manage the City’s disclosure program in conformance with federal, state, and local requirements, including the Sacramento City Charter, the Sacramento City C ode, and the City’s Debt- Management Policy.

2.2 Point of Contact. Either the City Treasur er or the Debt Manager will be the City’s point of contact for disclos ure, primarily responsible not only for developing and distributing information but also for determining the materiality of information.

2.3 Responsibility,
(A) The City Treasurer or the Debt Manager shall oversee all aspects of disclosure. As such, the City Treasurer or the Debt Manager shall review the form and content of the City’ s documents and materials prepared, issued, or distributed in connection with the City’s disclosure obligations relating to its debt. Those document s and materials include not just preliminary and final official statements following:
 Annual financial information provided to the Municipal SecuritiesRulemaking Board (“MSRB”) in accordance with SEC Rule 15c2-12 and any applicable cont inuing-disclosure agreement or certificate (except that the City Treasurer and the Debt Manager are not responsible for the form and content of the City’s audited financial report, which is prepared by the City’s Accounting Division and the City’s external auditor).
 Event notices provided to the MSRB in accordance with SEC Rule 15c2-12and any applicable conti nuing-disclosure agreement or certificate.
353
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Any other information provided to the MSRB for use by investors in making investment decisions.

Such information and notices will typically be provided through the MSRB’s Electronic Municipal Market Access website (known as “EMMA”), which the SEC has designated as t he official source for municipal securities data and disclosure documents.
(B) Along with the City Treas urer and his or her staf f, the City Attorney and the City Manager shall serve as integr al members of the financing team, each responsible, as appropriate, fo r ensuring and certifying to the accuracy of information released to the market.
(C) The City is responsible for the content of its disclosure documents. The City Treasurer, City Atto rney, and City Manager shall ensure the use of outside professionals for their respective areas of expertise is appropriate and that reliance upon outside professionals is reasonable and not excessive.
(D) The City Treasurer or the Debt Manager shall ensure that subject-matter experts, including City staff with rele vant knowledge or expertise, are involved in developing and periodically reviewing and updating disclosure documents. For example, when obligations are secured by specific revenues, such as water or wastew ater revenues, Cit y staff who are knowledgeable about the relevant utility must be involved. (E) The City Treasurer and Debt Manager, in collaboration with the City Attorney, shall arrange for the engagement of disclosure counsel to assist the City in complying with disclosure requirements. The City Treasurer or the Debt Manager shall also arrange for the periodic training of City officers and employees regarding t heir disclosure obligations under federal securities laws.
(F) City officers and employees servi ng as financing-team members are responsible for reviewing and commenting on draft documents. As part of their review, they must determine whether all material information— including confidential or politica lly sensitive information—has been included and is both accurate and relevant.
(G) City officers and employees and the officers and employees of related entities shall promptly provide all information, assurance, and certifications that the City Treasurer or the D ebt Manager requests for compliance with federal securities laws. The City Manager and the City Attorney shall require prompt and full responses to those requests.

3. Certifications

3.1 In connection with th e City Council’s approval of preliminary or final official statements for publicly issued debt, as appropriate City officer or employee shall certify in writing, to the best of his or her knowledge, the documents do not make any untrue statement 354
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.

3.2 The City Treasurer or t he Debt Manager shall provide offering documents such as preliminary official statements to appropriate City officials (which may include the Mayor and City Council, City Manager, City A ttorney, and other City officers and employees) in such a manner as to allo w timely, informed decisions regarding disclosure.

355
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

356
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Development Stabilization Contingency Reserve (DSCR) and Development Services Fund Management Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents
Purpose
Background
Policy
Management of Activities in Fund 2016

Related Regulatory References
May 12, 2015 Resolution 2015-0123

357
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

DSCR and Development Services Fund Management Policy

1. PURPOSE

The purpose of the DSCR and the Developm ent Services Fund (Fund 2016) is to ensure the prudent management of development funds for the public and the City of Sacramento. The DSCR will be used to bridge gaps between budgeted and actual development revenues in the Co mmunity Development Department (CDD) during periods of significant revenue decline.

2. BACKGROUND

The Development Services Fund was established on February 23, 1999 (Reso 99- 077), to account for major plan review and building permit projects, cyclical surplus plan review and building permit revenues , and environmental impact review projects. In 1999 the City Council authorized the transfer of General Fund budget surpluses, during periods of high buildi ng activity, in the Development Services Department to be transferred to the Development Servic es Fund. The intent was that the Development Services Fund wo uld be drawn down in years of lower building activity. Over time, these resour ces were used to fund ongoing workload, without an ongoing revenue stream. When the Fund could no longer support ongoing budgeted expenditures, the authority to carryover surpluses was removed from the annual budget resolution.

A sustainable funding plan for CDD building and planning operations is necessary for the department to be responsive to the economic climate. Establishing a DSCR Policy for Fund 2016 and Management Guid elines will provid e the department resources during a downturn in development activity and time to react to those changes.

3. POLICY

The DSCR shall be established as set forth below and any changes to the policy will be presented to and approved by the City Council.

(a) The DSCR goal is one year’s worth of building, building plan check, and current planning revenues.

(b) The DSCR will be initially funded with the available fund balance upon completion of the FY2014/15 audited financial statements for Fund 2016.

(c) Beginning with FY2014/15 actual year-end revenues in excess of budget from CDD’s Building Inspection, Building Pl an Check, Customer Service/Permit Counter, and Planning Operations, provided that the net year-end results (revenue and expenditure budget variance) of CDD are positive, will be transferred to the DSCR.
358
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(d) The DSCR will only be used to br idge gaps between projected and actual development-related revenues in CDD during periods of significant revenue shortfalls.

4. MANAGEMENT OF ACTIVITIES IN FUND 2016

The fund shall be used for the management of development activities, when those activities are intended to be fully offset by revenue s as described below and summarized in Attachment 1.

(a) Environmental impact review or planning review in fully reimbursable projects (P2100xxxx)

i. Revenues and expenditures must balance upon closure

ii. Shortfalls in completed projects where recovery efforts are unsuccessful will be covered by a transfer from t he DSCR so that the project may be closed with balanced revenues and expenditures

(b) Major development projects (I21xxxxxx) when building valuation is in excess of $50 million, to be adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index (e.g., high rise buildings, arenas, theaters in fully reimbursable projects)

i. Revenues and expenditures must balance upon closure

ii. Funds remaining in a completed project will be transferred first to the DSRC until the Reserve level is attained, then to the department’s General Fund operating budget

iii. Shortfalls in completed projects will be covered by a transfer from the DSCR so that the project may be closed with balanced revenues and expenditures

(c) Citywide Development Activities (funding provided by a % fee on all permits/plan reviews)

i. Technology for building or planni ng permitting systems: (e.g., Accela, CitizenServe, or eCAPS) to be managed in the separate capital projects (A21xxxxxx)

ii. General Plan and Community Plan updates: To be managed in a multi-year projects (I22xxxxxx) with separate child projects for the various plans/updates

359
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

360
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Revenue Recovery and
Fee Waiver Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
EMS Division
Fire Department
(916) 808-5352
[email protected]

Table of Contents
Purpose
Background
Policy

Related Regulatory References
July 27, 1993 Resolution 1993-0434
October 2011 AB 678-Ground Em ergency Medical Transport June 26, 2012 Resolution 2012-0214
March 18, 2014 Motion 2014-0053
December 5, 2017 Resolution 2017-0468

Effective Date: January 1, 2018

361
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

EMS Revenue Recovery and Fee Waiver Policy

1) PURPOSE
a) To establish a policy for revenue recove ry and fee waiver or reduction of costs associated with providing the City of Sacramento’s (City) EMS program. 2) DEFINITIONS
a) Advanced Life Support (ALS): This te rm is defined in Health and Safety Code section 1797.52.
b) Basic Life Support (BLS): This term is defined in Health and Safety Code section 1797.60.
c) Electronic Patient Care Report (ePCR): A patient care report, as defined in Sacramento County Emergen cy Medical Agency Policy No. 2305.22, in an electronic format. An ePCR is an elec tronic health record, within the meaning of Health and Safety Code section 1797.22 7, created for each patient by Fire Department staff at the time of service. The report is used to relay information between the responding unit and the receiving hospital staff. The report serves as documentation of the treatment provided.
d) Emergency: This term is defined in Health and Safety Code section 1797.70. e) Emergency Medical Services (EMS): This term is defined in Health and Safety Code section 1797.72. EMS includes Fire Department responses to provide ALS, BLS, and treat-not-transport patient care.
f) Fee Waiver: the forgiveness of all of a patient’s owed City Council approved EMS user fees, based on a formalized criteria and processes as outlined in this policy.
g) Fee Reduction: the forgiveness of a por tion of a patient’s owed City Council approved EMS user fees, based on a form alized criteria and processes as outlined in this policy.
3) BACKGROUND
a) On July 27, 1993 (Resolution 93-434), the City established the ALS program.

As costs for ALS services continue to increase, the revenues generated by fees for service have not grown proportionally. The City is challenged to recover fee for service revenues due to several different reasons, one of them being payer mix. The City’s payer mix is currently 40 percent Medicare, 40 percent Medicaid, and 15 percent private insurance with the remainder being from self- insured and uninsured. In addition, ther e are federally mandated write-offs which allow the City to co llect only a small percentage of the actual billed 362
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

amount from Medicare and Medicaid. In an effort to maximize reimbursements and cover direct costs the City has pursued additional recovery options. b) In October 2011, AB 678 authorizing the Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) program, was enacted. It provides for the reimbursement of transports of Medi-Cal patients who are not in managed care. On March 18, 2014, the Council authorized an agr eement with Sacramento Me tropolitan Fire District (Motion No. 2014-0053) to pursue reimbursements through the GEMT program.
c) On June 26, 2012, the Council approved increases to the ALS fees for service (Resolution 2012-214) to increase cost re covery to address a portion of the structural variance between the cost of providing services and the revenue collected for those services.
d) On December 16, 2014, Council authoriz ed the participation in the Rate Range Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) program . IGT allows local governments to receive a federal reimbursement for transporting Medi-Cal patients that are in managed care.
e) While the City can assure the continuation of fee for service revenues, revenue recovery programs such as GEMT and IGT are subject to the availability of state and federal funding.
4) EMS FEE RECOVERY POLICY
a) The EMS Program shall be fully offset by fees generated by services provided.

All revenues recovered for the provision of EMS services shall be used to cover direct and indirect costs to reduce the General Fund subsidy for this program. b) GEMT and IGT revenues received in excess of the Fire Department’s approved General Fund revenue budget, during the fiscal year, shall be committed for future appropriations for the Fire Department.
5) EMS FEE WAIVER POLICY
a) The City Manager or their designee may waive all or a portion of the EMS fees established by City Council as provided herein.
b) In no event shall any person be denied EM S services because of their inability or failure to pay the charges incurred for services provided. c) Procedures:
i. Fee Waiver Application:

1. An applicant or applicant’s le gal representative may submit a completed Fee Waiver Application with adequate supporting documentation to the Fire Department for review and
363
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

consideration. The Fee Waiver A pplication shall be on a form prescribed by the City Manager or their designee.

2. Fire Department staff, through assistance from a contracted billing company, will use reasonable research methods to confirm the validity of the information provided.

3. Upon completion of the application review process above, the contracted billing company will notify all applicants as instructed by the Fire Chief or their designee.

4. Fee waiver applications and s upporting documentation will be retained in accordance with the City’s Record Retention Policy. d) Fee Waiver Conditions and Options:
i. Financial Hardship. A fee waiver may be granted in circumstances where a financial hardship is demonstrated. The determination of a financial hardship shall be based on t he most recent Federal Poverty Level (FPL) chart provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Fire Chief may grant a waiver, reduction, or payment plan to applicants that demonstrate a financial hardship.

The current poverty information is available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty- guidelines

1. Waiver or Reduction: The Fire Ch ief may approve a full waiver or partial reduction of the remaining balance after all insurance payments have been posted based on the applicant’s ability to pay the remaining balance. Redu ctions may range from 25% to 50% based on the applicant’s fi nancial hardship as reflected above.
364
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

2. Payment Plan: The Fire Chief may offer a low-cost monthly payment plan in lieu of, or in addition to, a reduction for applicants that have a verified financial hardship.
ii. Services Provided. A waiver may be granted in circumstances where the level of response or services provi ded do not justify application of the charges incurred. Such determination shall be based on the contents of the applicable ePCR or one or more of the following circumstances:

1. The call for service did not requ ire response by Fire Department apparatus including an ambulance, engine company, or truck company;

2. Treatment or care provided to the applicant was at a lower level than the defined levels of ALS and BLS service;
iii. The applicant did not initiate t he call for service, and the applicant refused care.

365
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

366
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

P
Fees and Charges Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Policy

3. Proposition 26

Related Regulatory References
May 8, 2014 Resolution 2014-0111

Effective Date: July 1, 2015

367
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Fees and Charges Policy

1. PURPOSE
The City of Sacramento has the ability to determine the extent to which fees should be used to fund City facilities, infrastructure and services.

There are five main categories of fees that the City currently implements:
2  Impact/development fees are typically one-time charges levied by the City against new development to generate revenue for the construction of infrastructure and capital facilities needed to offset the effects of the new development.

 Service fees are charges imposed on pers ons or property that are designed to offset the cost of prov iding a government service. Sometimes these services are elective, such as fees for processing voluntary development permit applications, or providing service/recreation programs, while other service fees are not, such as mandatory service fees for trash or utility services. Such fees are typica lly reasonably related to the cost of providing the service for which the f ee is imposed. Otherwise, the fee may constitute a special tax for which voter approval is required by Propositions 13, 62, and 218.

 Regulatory fees are imposed to offset the cost of a regulatory program, such as business regulatory fees, or to mitigate the past, present, or future adverse impact of a fee payer’s operations. While payment of a regulatory fee does not necessarily provide any direct benefit from payment of the fee, there must be a "nexus" between the activity and the adverse consequences addressed by the fee. Common examples of regulatory fees include inspection fees and business license fees designed to reimburse a local agency for the cost of moni toring the business and enforcing compliance with City code.

 Rental fees are charged for the rental of public property and include the rental of real property, parking spaces in a public parking lot, or the rental of community facilities such as a recreation or community room or picnic area. Rental fees are not subject to the general rule that the fee must bear a direct relationship to the reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged however, rental fees must be fair and reasonable.

 Penalties/Fines are payment required for non- compliance or failure to adhere to specific rules and/or requirements.

2 League of California Cities Website: Spring Meeting May 13-15, 1998Laurence S. Wiener, Esq.City Attorney of Beverly Hills and Westlake Village THE CITY ATTORNEY'S ROLE IN EVALUATING FEE STUDIES. 368
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

This document sets forth guidelines for:

 Establishing cost recovery goals;
 Determining the categories of cost recovery levels in which to categorize/organize fees;
 Methods for determining which ca tegory a fee falls under; and  Establishment and modification of fees and charges.

2. POLICY

A. Cost Recovery Goals
In setting user fees and cost recovery levels, the following factors will be considered:3

1) The amount of a fee s hould not exceed the overal l cost of providing the

facility, infrastructure, or service for which the fee is imposed. In calculating that cost, direct and indirect costs may be included. That is:
 Costs which are directly related to the provision of the service; and  Support costs which are more gener al in nature but provide support for the provision of the service. For example, service fees can include reimbursement for the administrative costs of providing the service.

Development fees can include the cost of administering the program to construct public facilities that are necessary to serve new development.

2) The method of assessing and collecting fees should be as simple as possible in order to reduce the administrative cost of collection.

3) Fees should be sensitive to the “market” for similar services.

In addition, in setting enterprise fund fees and cost recovery levels, the following factors will be considered:

4) The City will set fees and rates at levels which fully cover the total direct and indirect costs, including operations, capital outlay and debt service of the enterprise programs.

5) The City will review and adjust enter prise fees and rate structures as required to ensure that they remain appropriate and equitable.

B. Categories of Cost Recovery Levels in Which to Categorize/Organize Fees

There are five categories of cost recovery levels in which to classify fees:

3 Government Finance Officers Association Website, Best Practices in Public Budgeting, City of San Luis Obispo: User Fee Cost Recovery Goals, 2005.
369
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

1) Enterprise: Full direct and indirect cost recovery (100% of total costs) for enterprise services such as water, se wer, and solid waste, as well as impact/development fees.
2) High: Full direct cost recovery (81-100% of total costs). 3) Medium: Recovery between 41-80% of direct costs.
4) Low: Recovery between 0-40% of direct costs.
5) Other: Fees based on market, geography, assessment, project specific, legal limits, or specific Council policy.

The City may choose, for policy reasons, to set fees at less than full recovery.

For example, fees based on market, geography, assessment, project specific, statutory/legal limits, or s pecific Council policy. In some cases, the City will acknowledge that a subsidy is accept able, or even necessary to ensure program access and viability.

C. Methods for Determining Which Category a Fee Falls Under

Implementation of higher cost recovery levels is appropriate under the following conditions (up to 100% of the cost of the service or program):
 The service is regulatory in nature (e.g., building permits, plan check fees);  The service is similar to services provided through the private sector;  Other private or public sector alternativ es could or do exist for the delivery of the service;
 Over-use of the service is specifical ly discouraged (e.g., police responses to disturbances or false alarms might fall into this category); and  Over-use of the service or facility is a specialized use that could be provided at a lower cost if not for specific nature or service (e.g., lighted fields).

Lower cost recovery levels are appropriate under the following conditions:
 There is no intended relationship bet ween the amount paid and the benefit received. (It is likely that some recreation and human service programs fall into this category as it is expected that these programs will be subsidized by funds);
 Collecting fees is not cost-effectiv e or will significantly affects the accessibility
to the service;
 The service is non-recurring, gener ally delivered on a peak demand or emergency basis, cannot be planned for and is not readily available from a private sector source (e.g., public safety services); and  Collecting fees would discourage co mpliance with regulatory requirements

and adherence is primarily se lf-identified, and as su ch, failure to comply would not be readily detected by the City.
370
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Other:
 Market pricing requires that there be a direct relationship between the amount paid and the level and cost of the service received or a direct relationship to actual prices being c harged for the service in the current market.
 Legal specifications and/or limitations to the amount that is charged.  Adopted Council Policy setting specific fee.

Factors to Consider
The extent to which the tota l cost of service should be recovered through fees depends upon the following factors:
 The nature of the facilities, infrastructure or services;  The nature and extent of t he benefit to the fee payer;  The effect of pricing on the demand for services; and  The feasibility of collection and recovery.

The chart below reflects these factors and the potential options for higher or lower cost recovery:4
The Nature of the
Facilities,
Infrastructure or
Services
The Nature and
Extent of the Benefit
to The Fee Payers
Effect of Pricing on
the Demand for
Services
Feasibility of
Collection and
Recovery
Higher Cost Recovery
In the case of fees for
facilities, infrastructure
and proprietary
services
5, total cost
recovery may be
warranted.

When a particular facility
or service results in
substantial, immediate
and direct benefit to fee
payers, a higher
percentage of the cost
of providing the facility
or service should be
recovered by the fee.

Because the pricing of
services can
significantly affect
demand, full cost
recovery for services is
more appropriate when
the market for the
services is strong and
will support a high level
of cost recovery.

In the case of impact
fees, which can be
collected at the time
of issuance of a
building permit, ease
of collection is
generally not a factor.

Lower Cost Recovery
In the case of
governmental services6,
it may be appropriate for
a substantial portion of
the cost of such
services to be borne by
the City’s taxpayers,
rather than the
individual users of such
services.

When a particular facility
or service benefits not
only the fee payer but
also a substantial
segment of the
community, lower cost
recovery is warranted.

If high levels of cost
recovery affect
accessibility to or
negatively affect the
delivery of services to
lower income groups,
this should be
considered based on
the overall goals of the
program being
implemented.

Some fees may prove
to be impractical for
the City to utilize if
they are too costly to
administer.

4 Government Finance Officers Association Website, Best Practices in Public Budgeting, City of Fort Collins, CO: User Fee Policies, 2005.
5 Proprietary services are those which are provided for the benefit and enjoyment of the residents of the City 6 Governmental services are those which are provided by the City for the public good such as regulating land use, maintaining streets, and providing police and fire protection.
371
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

D. Establishment and Modification of Fees and Charges
Fees will be reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis as part of the annual budget process to ensure that they keep pace with changes in the cost-of-living as well as changes in methods or levels of service delivery. At the beginning of the budget process each department will submit a list of proposed adjustments to their section of the master fee sched ule. Each service must be assigned a target cost recovery level as defined above.

Maintaining competitive status and comparability with other cities should be considered when determining new fee levels. Those fees that are proposed for adjustment should be be nchmarked against neighb oring jurisdiction fee schedules or appropriate service markets. The benchmark analysis should be taken into consideration when making final pricing decisions.

However, the City may choose, for policy re asons, to set fees at less than full recovery. (for example, fees based on market, geography, assessment, project specific, statutory/legal limits or specif ic Council policy). As stated above, in some cases, the City will ac knowledge that a subsidy is acceptable, or even necessary to ensure program access and viability. Where appropriate, fees that have not been increased in some time sh ould have increases phased in over several years to avoid ‘sticker shock’ increases.

If a particular fee is not adjusted in the budget process, to the extent feasible and/or appropriate, it should be increased biennially by a CPI factor to keep pace with inflation. Beginning in FY2014/ 15 the City will use the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Consumer Price Index (CPI) which is the same index used by the County As sessor to adjust the annual property tax roll for inflation.

Biennially, the Finance Department shall determine the percentage change in this index and apply the increase or dec rease to the master fee schedule, rounding up to the nearest whole dollar. Certain fees are exempt from an index adjustment, such as fees set by the State of California, percentage-based fees or those that have been identified as inappropriate for indexed fee increases (e.g., feasibility or fees that are based on market for services). Exempt fees are noted in the master fee sch edule. Council may consider fee issues outside of the annual budget process on a case-by-case basis.

The City should conduct a comprehensive cost of service analysis every five to seven years to ensure fees and charges are set appropriately. Generally, fees may be adjusted based on supplemental analysis whenever there have been significant changes in the method, level or cost of service delivery. For example, changes in processes and technology change the staff time required to provide services to the public. A cost-of-service study will identify and quantify these changes.

372
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

3. Proposition 26

Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Init iative,” was passed by the voters on November 2, 2010, to amend Article XIII C of the State Constitution. According to the ballot measure, the int ent of the measure is to ensure the effectiveness of Propositions 13 and 218 by prov iding a definition of a “t ax” for state and local purposes “so that neither the Legislature nor local governments can circumvent these restrictions on increasing taxes by simply defining new or expanded taxes as ‘fees.” Accordingly, under Proposition 26 a tax has been very broadly defined.

Tax Defined:
“Tax” now means “any levy, charge, or exaction of any kind imposed by a local government, except for the following seven categories of charges:

Exception 1 – Benefit Conferred or Privilege Granted
A charge imposed for a specific benefit conferred or privilege granted directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of conferring the benefit or granting the privilege.

Examples:
o Residential parking permit fees
o Professional licenses
o Business improvement assessments
Exception 2 – Government Service or Product
A charge imposed for a specific government service or product provided directly to the payor that is not provided to those not charged, and which does not exceed the reasonable costs to the local government of providing the service or product.

Examples:
o User fees for park and recreation programs
o Weed abatement fees
o Sidewalk curb repairs
Exception 3 – Licenses and Permits
A charge imposed for the reasonable regu latory costs to a local government for issuing licenses and permits , performing investigations, inspections, and audits, enforcing agricultural mark eting orders, and the admin istrative enforcement and adjudication thereof.

Examples:
o Building inspections
o Cardroom license
o Business licenses

373
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exception 4 – Use of City property
A charge imposed for entrance to or use of local government property, or the purchase, rental, or lease of local government property.

Examples:
o City-owned parking lots
o Swimming pools
o Convention Center rentals
o Golf green fees
Exception 5 – Fines and Penalties
A fine, penalty, or other monetary charge imposed by the judicial branch of government or a local government as a result of a violation of law.

Examples:
o City Code fines and pena lties (e.g., 1.28.020)
o Parking fines
Exception 6 – Property Development Charges
A charge imposed as a condition of property development.

Example:
o Development impact fees
Exception 7 – Proposition 218 Fees
Assessments and property related fees imposed in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218, Article XIII D.

Examples:
o Utility fees for water, sewe r, drainage, and solid waste o Street lighting assessments
Burden of Proof:

The paragraph following the seven enumerated exceptions states:
“The local government bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence [1] that a levy, charge, or other exaction is not a tax, [2] that the amount is no more than necessary to cover the reasonable costs of the government activity, and [3] that the manner in which those costs are allocated to a payor bears a fair or reasonable relationship to the payor’s burdens on, or benefits received from, the governmental activity.” The latter two requ irements only apply to the first three exceptions.

Thus, with the burden of proof now shifted to the City, that requires each department to take into consideration how it aims to prove that a proposed fee or fee increase is not a tax. The following analytical framework can assist in this regard.

374
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Burden of Proof: A 3-step Analysis

1. The City must make a threshold determination whether one of the exceptions applies.
o If none apply, it is a tax subject to voter approval.

2. If Exceptions 1, 2, or 3 apply, the City must also show that the fee revenue will not exceed the reasonable costs of providing the related governmental activity (at the aggregate level).

3. Finally, the City must show that the costs are fairly allocated to the individual payors.

375
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

376
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

General/Measure U (G/MU) Fund Economic Uncertainty
Reserve (EUR) Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Background

3. Policy

3.1 Minimum and Target Reserve Levels

3.2 Methods to Achieve Funding Levels

3.3 Criteria for Expenditure of Reserve Funds

3.4 Timeline for Replenishment of the EUR

Related Regulatory References
April 26, 2016 Council Motion 2016-0122
June 11, 2019 Resolution 2019-0248

Effective Date: July 1, 2019

377
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

General/Measure U (G/MU) Fund Economic Uncertainty
Reserve (EUR) Policy

1. PURPOSE

To establish the targeted level of G/MU Fund operating reserves, a basic component of a financially strong city . Adequate reserves help sustain City operations when adverse or unexpected circ umstances affect the City, providing resources to minimize service disrupti on in the event of temporary revenue shortfalls or unpredicted one-time expenditu res. This policy establishes the amounts the City will strive to maintain in its Economic Uncertainty Reserve (EUR) and the conditions under which the reserve may be used.

2. BACKGROUND

Financial reserves strengthen the City’s financial status and provide valuable resources for unexpected events. Every fund of the City represents a stand-alone financial set of accounts and has its own operating characteristics, financial capabilities, and constraints. The level of reserves needed should be based on the financial and operating characteristics of each fund. In June 2011, the City Council adopted a goal of establishi ng a General Fund EUR equivalent to 10% of annual General Fund revenues.

According to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), it is essential that governments maintain adequate levels of fund balance to mitigate current and future risks (e.g., revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures) in order to protect taxpayers and employees from unexpected changes in financial conditions.

GFOA recommends, at a minimum, that general-purpose governments, regardless of size, maintain an unrestricted budgetary fund balance in their General Fund of no less than two months of regular gener al fund operating re venues or regular general fund operating expenditures (http ://www.gfoa.org/appropriate-level- unrestricted-fund-balance-general-fund).

This policy establishe s 10% of annual G/MU Fund budgeted revenues as the minimum level of funding in the City’s EUR and establishes two months of operating expenditures as a target reserve level. The policy also outlines the methods the City will utilize to achieve the target reserve level, defines the conditions under which these funds can be used and describes how the City’s expenditure and/or revenue levels will be adjusted to match any new economic realities that are causing the use of fund balance reserves as a financing bridge.

378
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

3. POLICY

3.1 Minimum and Target Reserve Levels

The City will maintain an EUR at a mi nimum of 10% of budgeted G/MU Fund revenues. The City will seek to achieve and maintain a G/MU Fund EUR equal to two months of regular ongoing G/MU Fund ex penditures, including transfers (i.e., 17% of G/MU Fund expenditures).

The EUR shall be reported as a commitmen t of fund balance in the G/MU Fund for external financial reporting. Appropriations from the EUR may only be made by a vote of the City Council to meet a critical, unpredictable financial need.

3.2 Methods to Achieve Funding Levels

The annual budget will include a minimum fund balance of 0.50% of total budgeted expenditures. If these resources are not required during the fiscal year this amount shall be transfe rred to the EUR. Additionally, unbudgeted one-time G/MU Fund revenues received in a fiscal year, which are not required to balance the budget as part of the mi dyear review or fiscal year -end close, shall be added to the EUR until the target reserve level is met.

During the budget process, st aff shall review the current and five-year projected reserves to ensure that they are appropriate given the economic and financial risk factors the City faces.

3.3 Criteria for Expenditu re of Reserve Funds
The EUR is intended to contend with significant short-term issues, inclusive of unexpected revenue shortfalls, higher than anticipated ex penditures, or declared emergencies.

It is the intent of the Council to limit use of the EUR to address unanticipated, non- recurring needs. Reserves shall not nor mally be applied to recurring annual operating expenditures. The EUR may, however, be used strategically to allow time for the City to restructure its operations in a deliberate manner (as might be required in an economic downturn), but such use will only take place in the context of a Council-adopted long-term plan.

3.3 Timeline for Replen ishment of the EUR

If the EUR is drawn down below the minimum level, a plan will be developed and implemented to replenish the reserve, generally from future surpluses.

Replenishing the EUR will be a priority us e of one-time resources. Generally, the City should seek to replenish the EUR to the minimum reserve level within one to three years.

379
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

380
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Interfund Loans

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Background

3. Policy

3.1 Long-term Loans

3.2 Short-term Loans

3.3 Prohibited Uses

Related Regulatory References
Council Motion 2015-0141

381
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Interfund Loans Policy

1. PURPOSE
The City’s Interfund Loan Po licy documents the methods used by the City to demonstrate prudent financial management over interfund loans. The policy:
 Requires City Council approval of in terfund loans, except for short-term working capital loans,
 Permits short-term interfund loans fo r working capital to cover Council- approved reimbursable grants and projects and other temporary timing differences in cash flows, and
 Prohibits interfund loans from being used to solve ongoing structural budget issues or hindering the accomplishment of any function or project for which the lending fund was established.

2. BACKGROUND
Interfund loans are the lending of cash from one City fund to another for a specific purpose and with a requirement for repayment. The practice of interfund loans is a recognized and necessary aspect of municipal finance. Such loans are typically short-term in nature and constitute the allo cation of resources between individual funds for working capital purposes.

3. POLICY

3.1 Long-term Loans
Interfund loans, other than short-term working capital loans, must be approved by the City Council. Council approval will include the following terms of the loan:
 Purpose of Interfund Loan
 Identification of the source fund
o Availability of unrestrict ed funds in the source fund o Review of multi-year plans for use of source fund cash o Analysis of legal or contractual restrictions
 Repayment of Interfund Loan
o Repayment must have a payment source and funding stream o Specific repayment schedule
o Interest imposed at a rate equal to at least investment earnings if loan did not occur
382
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Other Considerations
o Feasibility of repayment
o Internal controls to monitor repayment

3.2 Short-term Loans
Short-term interfund loans for working capital to provide cash for Council- approved reimbursable grants and proj ects, are permitted. Short-term working capital loans are also permitted for temporary timing differences in cash flows when expenditure s are incurred before revenue is collected. The source funds for working capital interfund loans are the Risk Fund and the General Fund.

3.3 Prohibited Uses
 Interfund loans will not be used to solve ongoing structural budget issues.
 Interfund loans will not hinder the a ccomplishment of any function or project for which the lending fund was established.

383
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

384
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Investment Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Office of the City Treasurer
(916) 808-5168
[email protected]

Regulatory References
Council Resolution 2020-0236

Effective Date: July 28, 2020

385
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Investment Policy
The purpose of this document is to set fort h the investment and o perational policies for the management of the public funds of the City of Sacramento. These policies are designed to ensure the prudent management of public funds under management by the Sacramento City Treasurer.

Although the Sacramento City Charter generally provides the City Treasurer with the authority to deposit and invest funds in the City Treasury, undertaking of the investment activities by the City Treasurer is subject to the annual delegation of investment authority from the City Council as the body being primarily responsible for the investment of City funds. Accordingly, these policies are app licable to the managem ent of City treasury funds as that task may be delegated to the City Treasurer.

A copy of this policy statement will be provided to all investment brokers and dealers and others in related fields doing business with the City of Sacramento, and will be provided to other interested parties on request. In addition, this policy statement will be posted to the City Treasurer’s page of the City’s internet website.

An entity retained to provide investment-related services to the City of Sacramento shall not render services unless and until it confi rms, in writing, that it has received and reviewed this policy statement, and is prepared to implement its terms, as applicable to the services to be provided by the entity.

I. Governing Authority; Scope
Section 73 of the Sacrament o City Charter vests the City Treasurer with authority to deposit and invest funds of the City treasury, subject to the annual delegation of investment authority from the City Council to the City Treasurer pursuant to Government Code section 53607. These policies shall apply to the City Treasurer’s investment of City treasury funds.

The City Treasurer investment program for all treasury funds shall be operated in conformance with applicable federal, state, and other legal requ irements. This policy statement is intended to conform to Gove rnment Code sections 53600, et seq, and interpretation of these policies shall be consistent with those statutes.

II. Objectives
A. Primary Objectives
The primary objectives of investment activities, in order of priority, are safety, liquidity, and yield:

1. Safety
Safety of principal is the foremost objecti ve of the investment program. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The objective is to mitigat e credit risk and intere st rate risk. Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer.

The City will minimize credit risk by:

386
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(a) Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer.

The City minimize credit risk by:
i. Limiting investments to the types of securities listed in Section VI of this Investment Policy
ii. Re-qualifying the financial in stitutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers with wh ich the City will do business in accordance with Section IV.
iii. Diversifying the investment portfolio so that the impact of potential losses from any one type of security or from any one individual issuer will be minimized.
(b) Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that the market value of securities in the portfolio will fall due to changes in market interest rates. The City will minimize interest rate risk by:
i. Structuring the investm ent portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity ii. Investing operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities, money market mutual funds, the Local Agency Investment Fund (“LAIF”) managed by the State of California, or similar investment pools and limiting the average maturity of the portfolio in accordance with this policy.

2. Liquidity
The investment portfolio shall remain su fficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands (static liquidity). Furthermore, si nce all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio should consist largel y of securities with active secondary or resale markets (dynamic liquidity). Alternat ively, a portion of the portfolio may be placed in money market mutual funds or LAIF which offer same day liquidity for short- term funds.

The staff of the City Treasurer’s Office shall (i) monitor the City’s budget formation and approval process and (ii) actively engage wit h City staff to assess and manage cash flow needs of the City.

3. Yield
The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and econom ic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments is limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the low level of risk being assumed. 387
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Securities shall generally be held until maturity with the following exceptions:
(a) A security with declining value may be sold early to minimize loss of principal. (b) A security swap would improve the qualit y, yield, or target duration in the portfolio.
(c) Liquidity needs of t he portfolio require that the security be sold. (d) Where the sale of the security to r ealize capital, gains is advisable in the judgment of the investment officers.

B. Other Objectives

1. Pooling of Funds
Except for cash in certain restricted and s pecial funds, the City will consolidate cash and reserve balances from all funds to maximize investment earnings and to increase efficiencies with regard to investment pr icing, safekeeping and administration.

Investment income will be allocated to the various funds proportionately based on their respective participation and in accordance with genera lly accepted accounting principles. The pooling of funds shall hav e no effect on the legal character of the pooled funds, i.e. funds whose use is restri cted by law shall remain restricted and cannot be used as part of the City’s general fund.

2. Local Considerations
Where possible, as a secondary objective, funds may be invested for the betterment of the local economy. The Cit y Treasurer may accept a pr oposal from an eligible institution that provides for a reduced rate of interest pr ovided that such institution documents the use of deposited funds for local community development projects.  An eligible local community institution is defined as being headquartered in counties in and around Sacramento, including but not limited to Placer, El Dorado, Sutter, and Yolo.
 To be recognized as an eligible local community institution the entity must have had a 5 star “Superior” Rating from either Bauer Financial or IDC Financial Publishing for the past 4 consecutive quarters. Eligible institutions must submit their quarterly ratings to the City Treasurer’s office and maintain their 5-star rating continuously. If an eligible local community institution drops below the required 5-star rating, they will have 1 quarter to cure the deficiency. If in the following quarter the institution does not re-achieve a 5- star rating with the same independent rating company, the City may withdraw funds allocated to that institution.
 Institutions who receive deposits from the City as part of a local community investment not eligible for FDIC insu rance must be secured by collateral of 110% as described in California Go vernment Code Section 53651 and 53652.

388
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Institutions who receive deposits from the City as part of a local community investment must commit to invest 50% of the deposits in the local community, within the City of Sacramento City limits.
 Institutions must provi de a detailed semi-annual report to the City Treasurer’s Office that shows evidence that the institution is meeting the 50% local community investment mandate on the City’s deposits. If an institution cannot provide evidence that it has met the 50% local community investment criteria, the City may withdraw its deposits from the institution.  As a matter of prudence, the amount the City Treasurer may invest in eligible local community institutions will be limit ed to 3.5% of the institution's total assets, as determined by the quarterly independent financial reports. If, during the course of an inve stment with an eligible lo cal institution, the City exceeds the maximum 3.5% deposit leve l, the City may withdraw any funds in excess of the limit to cure the deficiency.
 The city may place deposits with eligib le local community institutions up to a total of 10% of the total in the City’s portfolio. If this amount is exceeded the City may withdraw funds from any instit ution to reduce th e total community investment back below the maximum.

Although an eligible local community instit ution may meet all of the above stated criteria, it is not a guarant ee that the City will maintain deposits. The City Treasurer retains the right to make deposit and wit hdrawal decisions based on the Primary Objectives of the Investment Policy stated above.

3. Favored Investments
Investments are encouraged in entities that have demonstrated significant commitment and cooperation (a) with foreclosure prevention efforts, including, without limitation, temporary mora toriums on foreclosures, re negotiation of the principle mortgage balances to reflect current va lues, and other good faith negotiations with homeowners in regard to delinquent mortgages, and/or (b) in offering free or low-cost banking services to low- and moderate- income residents who are part of the traditionally “unbanked” or “under-banked” population. The City Treasurer may take into consideration the level of effort an entity expends in either the foreclosure relief or community banking areas, or both, when c onsidering competing investments. If the City Treasurer is satisfied with the record of an entity in regard to such efforts, then the Treasurer’s investment staff may invest in the securities of the entity, provided that the investment is otherwise consistent with the requirements of this Investment Policy statement.

III. Standards of Care
A. Prudence
In accordance with Government Code sect ion 53600.3, the stand ard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the "prudent person" standard and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures dev eloped by the City Treasurer and this investment policy and exercising due di ligence shall be relieved of personal 389
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided extraordinary deviations from expectations are reported by subo rdinate investment officers to the City Treasurer in a prompt fashion and that the sale of securities is carried out in accordance with the terms of this policy.

Pursuant to the "prudent person" standard, investment officers shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Funds shall be managed not for speculation where the sole goal of a transaction is to increase principal balances, but for investment intended to earn a reas onable rate of return on invested funds, considering the probable safety of their c apital as well as the probable income to be derived. Despite that inve stment transactions are undertaken with care pursuant to the “prudent person” standard, it is recognized that invested funds are subject to the vagrancies of the markets beyond the control of the investment officers.

B. Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution and management of the investment program, or that could impair their ability to make impartial decisions.

Employees and investment officials shall di sclose any material interests in financial institutions with which they conduct business. They shall further disclose any personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio. Employees and investment officers shall refrain from undertaking personal investment transacti ons with the same individual with whom business is conducted on behalf of the City.

Investment officers shall file State Fair Political Practices Commission’s Statement of Economic Interests and make the disclosures required by the City’s conflict of interest policies.

C. Delegation of Authority
Authority to manage the Cit y treasury investment progr am is granted to the City Treasurer pursuant to Sacramento City Charter section number 73, unless the Charter specifically indicates otherwise, subject to annual delegation of investment authority by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 53607. Pursuant to the City Charter, the City Treasurer also is authorized to appoint deputies and employees, as prescribed by Council resolution, to implem ent the investment program. The City Treasurer and those employees appointed by the Treasurer to perform investment activities pursuant to these policies shal l be referred to herein collectively as “investment officers.”
Investment officers shall act in accordance with established wr itten procedures and internal controls for the oper ation of the investment pr ogram consistent with this investment policy (“Investment Procedures Manual”). Procedures should include references to: safekeeping, delivery vs. payment, investment accounting, repurchase agreements, wire transfer agr eements, and collateral/depos itory agreements. No 390
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures manual. The investment officers shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall estab lish a system of controls to regulate their activities.

IV. Authorized Financial Institutions, Depositories, and Broker/Dealers A. Selection
Financial institutions and depos itories involved in implem enting the City Treasurer’s investment activities are selected on a competitive basis in order to obtain high quality services by reliable, reputable and stable ent ities. The competit ive process may be formal or informal, as determined by the City Treasurer in his or her discretion, with the objective of obtaining the quality of services necessary to serve the best interests of the City and relevant stakeholders, with services performed at competitive fees and rates. Such processes may occur from ti me to time by the City Treasurer’s Office whether at the time the City Treasurer contracts for the ge neral banking services or otherwise. The firm or firms providing investment-related services may or may not be, at the discretion of the Cit y Treasurer, the same firm providing general banking services. Among the factors that the City Treasurer may consider in obtaining such services are (i) minimum qualifications pertaining to capacity, satisfaction of requirements to conduct required business, i.e. licenses, permits, registrations, certifications, etc.; (ii) capitalization; (iii) insurance and bonding; (iv) safekeeping and custodial experience; (v) status in good standing; (vi) ability and capacity of the firm to provide a full range of services as may be required by the City Treasurer; (vii) extent of the value added by an entity over the se rvices provided by firms then-providing investment-related services to the City Treasurer’s Office; and (viii) other attributes as may be determined by the City Treasurer from time to time. The City Treasurer may determine the number and nature of firms to be retained to provide investment-related services based upon the volume of existi ng and projected investment work. Those firms that are selected to execute transac tions on behalf of the City shall do so in a good faith manner and in the best interests of the City, and shall disclose to and advise the investment officers of material fact s that bear upon the pricing of a given transaction order given by investment office rs. All financial inst itutions executing investment transactions shall satisfy the requirements of Government Code section 53601.5. All depositories shal l satisfy the institutional qualifications and security requirements described in Government Code sections 53648 et seq.

B. Performance Review
All financial institutions and depositories shall maintain the qualifications and attributes deemed appropriate by the City Treasurer, including, but not limited to those enumerated in subsection A above, and shall perform their duties in a satisfactory manner. The City Treasurer, at his or her discretion, shall conduct periodic performance reviews to ensure the institutions and depositories are providing services in the best interests of the City.

391
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

V. Safekeeping and Custody
A. Delivery vs. Payment
All trades of marketable securities will be ex ecuted by delivery vs. payment (DVP) to ensure that securities are deposited in an eligible financia l institution prior to the release of funds.

B. Safekeeping
Securities will be held by an independent third-party cu stodian selected by the City Treasurer. The inventory and value of cash and securities held by the custodian will be reconciled on a daily basis. The custodial institution shall annually provide a copy of their most recent repor t on internal controls in accordance with Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 18, or SSAE 18.

C. Internal Controls, Investment Procedures Manual
The City Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to guide the activities of the investment officers to ensure that the assets of the City are protec ted from loss, theft or misu se. Details of the internal controls system shall be documented in the Investment Procedures Manual and shall be reviewed and updated annually, as needed. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a contro l should not exceed the benefits likely to be deriv ed and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. The internal controls structure shall address the following points:

1. Prevention of collusion

2. Separation of transaction authority from accounting and recordkeeping

3. Custodial safekeeping

4. Avoidance of physical delivery securities

5. Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members

6. Written confirmation of transactions for investments and wire transfers

7. Development of a wire transfer agreem ent with the lead bank and third-party custodian
Accordingly, the City Treasurer shall establish a process for an annual independent review by an external auditor to assure co mpliance with policies and procedures or alternatively, compliance should be assured through t he City annual independent audit.

VI. Suitable and Authorized Investments
A. Investment Types
Allowable investments of f unds not required for the imm ediate use by the City are limited to those described in Government Code sections 16429.1 (Local Agency Investment Fund), 53601 (investment of su rplus), 53601.8 (certificates of deposit), 392
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

53635 (purchase of commercial paper by pools) and 53638 (bank deposits), as such statutes may be amended or r enumbered from time to time. These allowable investments, and their permitted amounts and attributes, are set forth in a summary prepared and updated from time to time by the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission (“CDIAC”) entitled, “Allowable Investment Instruments Per State Government Code, Applicable To All Local Agencies,” included CDIAC’s “Local Agency Investment Guidelines” publ ication that may be located at http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cdiac/LAIG/guideline.pdf
B. Extended Maturities
The investment officers will observe the ma ximum maturity term of five years on various of the allowable inve stments. However, where a particular investment is found by the investment officers to be advantageous and consistent with these policies, but for a nominal exceedance of a 5-year maximum maturity caused by effect of the security’s issuance and maturi ty dates, or the settlement date of the transaction, or both, they ar e authorized to invest in t he following obligations with remaining maturities of five (5 ) years, plus not more than thirty (30) calendar days:

U.S. Treasury obligations, obligations of Ca lifornia or other stat es, California local agency obligations, U.S. Agency obligations and medium-term notes. The City Treasurer will provide notice to the City Co uncil of such investments within periodic investment reports made to the Council. See, Section VIII.A. Pursuant to Government Code section 53601, investment officers shall not make investments in instruments with maturities longer than five (5) years, plus thirty (30) calendar days, without prior approval of the City Council.

C. Securities Lending
The investment officers at their discretion may engage in securities lending activities pursuant to securities lending agreements (as defined in Government Code section 53601(j)(5)(D)) provided that the following are satisfied:

1. Securities lending transactions ar e to be governed by agreements entered into by the City Treasurer and the agent or agents the City Treasurer engages to perform such transactions provided that such agreements (a) comply with the requirements of Government Code section 53601(j), and
(b) require the payment of cash collateral equal to or greater than 102% of the market value of the loaned security at the time of the loan.

2. The securities lending agreements may allow for the use of cash collateral for the reinvestment in securities that
(a) comply with the requirements of Government Code section 53601(j)(3)(D), and
(b) are securities whose direct investment is authorized by Government Code section 53601 and these policies,
(c) provided that nothing herein s hall preclude the Cit y Treasurer from entering into securities lending agreements that reduces the scope of 393
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

investments made with cash collateral to something less than that allowed under subsections (a) and (b) above.

VII. Investment Parameters
A. Diversification
The City shall diversify its investment portfolio. To minimize risk of loss resulting from the over-concentration of assets in a specific maturity, issuer, or type of securities, all cash and cash equivalent assets in all Cit y funds shall be diversified by maturity, issuer, and class of security. Diversifica tion strategies shall be determined and revised on an ongoing basis by the investment officers for all funds covered by these investment policies. In establishing s pecific diversification strategies, these investment policies shall apply. The investment officers shall emphasize that portfolio maturities will be staggered to avoid undue concentration of assets in a specific maturity sector. Maturities selected s hall provide for stability of income and reasonable liquidity.

B. Cash Management Funds

1. Liquidity shall be assured through practices ensuring that the payroll dates and dates of large disbursements are covered through maturing investments or marketable U.S. Treasury bills.

2. Positions in securities having potent ial default risk shall be limited in size pursuant to the maximum limits set forth in Government Code section 53601.

See Attachment A. Such securities include the following: Commercial paper; negotiable certificates of deposit, and Banker’s Acceptances.

3. Risks of market price volatility shall be controlled through maturity diversification.

4. Liquidity risk: Because of inherent diffi culties in accurately forecasting cash flow requirements, a portion of the portfolio should be continuously invested in readily available funds such as LAIF, money market funds, overnight repurchase agreements, and/or marketable securities that can be sold to raise cash in one day’s notice, to ens ure that appropriate liquidity is maintained to meet ongoing obligations.

C. Competitive Bids
The investment officers shall obtain compet itive bids from at least two brokers or financial institutions on all purchases and sales of investment instruments executed on the secondary market for consideration in excess of $15 million per purchase transaction.

VIII. Reporting
A. Investment Reports
The City Treasurer shall present to the City Council, the City Manager and the City’s internal auditor monthly investment reports that include the transactions as required by Government Code section 53607.

394
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

B. Marking to Market
For purposes of preparation of the invest ment reports, the market value of the portfolio shall be calculated. In defining market value, considerations should be given to the GASB Statement 31 pronouncement.

C. Performance Standards
The investment portfolio will be managed in accordance with the parameters specified within established against which portfolio per formance shall be compared on a regular basis. The benchmarks shall be refl ective of the actual securities being purchased and risks undertaken.

IX. Policy Considerations
A. Exemption
Any investment currently held that does not meet the guidelines of this policy shall be exempted from the requirements of this policy, provided that the City Treasurer may take steps he or she deems appropriate to address non-compliant investments in the best interest of the City and pool parti cipants. At maturity or liquidation, such monies shall be reinvested only as provided by this policy.

B. Amendments
This policy shall be reviewed annually by the investment officers. Any change must be approved by the City Treasurer, followed by review and consideration by the City Council pursuant to Section X of these policies.

X. City Council Consideration of Investment Policy
This policy shall be reviewed and considered by the City Council on an annual basis pursuant to Government Code section 53646(a)(2).

XI. Miscellaneous
A. Statutory References
All statutory references cited in these policies shall refer to the statute as it may be amended or renumbered from time to time.

395
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

396
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB)

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents
Purpose
Background
Policy

Effective: February 16, 2016

397
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) Policy

1. PURPOSE

In order to assure that the City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) program is financially sustainable, the program should accumulate adequate resources in a systematic and disciplined manner over the active service life of benefitting employees. The City’s OPEB Funding Poli cy documents the method the City will use to determine its actuarially determined contributions to fund the long-term cost of benefits to City employees and retirees. The policy also:

 Demonstrates prudent financial management practices;
 Promotes long-term and strategic thinking;
 Provides guidance in making annual budget decisions;
 Reassures bond rating agencies; and
 Demonstrates to employees and the public how OPEB will be funded to ensure adequate funding for negotiated benefits.

2. BACKGROUND

The City provides OPEB benefits to active employees hired bef ore specific dates based on negotiated labor agreements and the unrepresented resolution. The City’s OPEB benefits consist of a cash contribut ion benefit for retiree medical and dental benefits and subsidized premiums resulting from blending retirees and active employees in the same risk pool. For police and miscellaneous employees, the cash benefit amount is $300 per month for retirees only and $365 per month for retirees with dependents. Police em ployees hired after September 3, 2013, and miscellaneous employees hired after June 30, 2012, are not e ligible for OPEB benefits. For fire employees hired before January 14, 2015, the cash benefit amount is the total of the lowest cost $25 co- pay health plan premium for one plus an additional 5.28 percent of that cost; the lowest cost PPO dental plan for one; and $25.

Fire employees hired on or after January 14, 2015, are eligible for a cash benefit amount up to $774 monthly from the date of retirement until the retiree reaches Medicare eligibility age, and up to $387 m onthly from the date the retiree reaches Medicare eligibility. Fire employees pay $45 per month, with a City match of $45 per month, deposited to a separate trust fund to pay for the benefit.

The City’s OPEB cash benefit is prorated based on years of service – 50 percent for employees with ten to fifteen years of service, 75 percent for employees with fifteen to twenty years of service and 100 perc ent for employees with twenty years of service or more.

398
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Currently, the City has $363 million in unde rfunded long-term liabilities associated with retiree medical benefits from all funding sources, $309 million attributable to the General Fund. While the benef it was historically funde d on a pay-as-you-go (pay- go) basis, paying only the actual cost of the benefit for retirees in the current fiscal year, financial accounting standards require the City to account for the benefit as if it were actuarially funded. If the City does not replace the current plan of pay-go combined with minimal contributions to th e City’s relatively new OPEB trust fund, the City’s pay-go obligation will continue to grow, consum ing resources that would otherwise pay for vital programs and services.

Consistent with best practices, in January 2013 Council authorized the establishment of an irrevocable trust with an initial General Fund investment of $2 million. Another $2 million was contributed to the trust in FY2013/14. The FY2014/15 and FY2015/16 approved budgets each included a $1 million contribution to the trust, bringing the total funding for the trust to $6 million. The approved FY2014/15 and FY2015/16 Budget Resoluti ons also included authority to direct available budgetary resources in the pension budget accounts at the end of the fiscal year to the OPEB Trust.

3. POLICY

3.1 OPEB Actuarially Determined Contribution (ADC)

The City will engage an OPEB actuary to determine the City’s ADC based on biennial actuarial valuations. The ADC will include the normal cost for current service and amortization of the unfunded liability. The normal cost 1 will be
calculated using the entry age no rmal cost method using appropriate economic and non-economic assumptions approved by the City.

The City will review the actuarial valuations to validate the completeness and accuracy of the employee census data and the reasonableness of the actuarial assumptions. Actuarial valuat ions involve estimates and assumptions about
the probability of occurr ence of events far into the future. Actuarially determined amounts are subjec t to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future.

3.2 Funding the ADC
The City will continue to appropriate in the annual budget for contributions to the OPEB Trust and the pay-go costs of OPEB for current retirees, as well as use one-time savings in pension contributions to make additional contributions to the OPEB Trust.

1 Normal Cost – the current year cost of the program to provide the benefit for current employees in the future. 399
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

The City will fully fund the ADC within 10 years, or by Fiscal Year 2025-26, by reducing the gap between its current OPEB funding and the ADC with a combination of City contributions, employee contributions, and OPEB plan changes.

The City will achieve “full funding” of its OPEB plan within 30 years, or by Fiscal Year 2045-46, with a 20-year amortization of the unfunded liability after the 10- year ramp-up period. Full funding of the OPEB plan is defined as funding 100 percent of the accrued liability on an actuarial basis.

3.3 Transparency and Reporting
Funding of the City’s OPEB should be transparent to all parties including City employees, retirees, recognized employee organizations, the City Council and Sacramento residents. In order to achieve this transparency, the following information shall be available:
a. Copies of the biennial actuarial valuations for the City’s OPEB plan shall be made available to the City Council.
b. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report shall be published on its website. This report includes information on the City’s OPEB plan, contributions to the OPEB Trust, and the funded status of the plan. c. The City’s annual oper ating budget shall include appropriations for contributions to the OPEB Trust and pay-go costs.

3.4 Review of Funding Policy
Funding OPEB requires a long-term plan. The City will review this policy at a minimum biennially, coincident with preparation of the actuarial valuations, to determine if changes to this policy are necessary to ensure adequate resources are being accumulated to fund OPEB benefits. Pol

400
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Pension Funding

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Background

3. Policy

3.1 CalPERS ADC

3.2 SCERS ADC

3.3 Transparency and Reporting

3.4 Review of Funding Policy

Related Regulatory References
Council Motion 2015-0095 (May 5, 2015)
CalPERS
SCERS

401
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Pension Funding Policy

1. PURPOSE

The City’s Pension Funding Policy docum ents the method the City will use to determine its actuarially determined contri butions to fund the long-term cost of benefits to the plan participants and annuitants. The policy also:

 Provides guidance in making annual budget decisions;  Demonstrates prudent fi nancial management practices;  Reassures bond rating agencies; and
 Shows employees and the publ ic how pensions will be funded.

2. BACKGROUND

The City provides defined benefit retirement benefits through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) and the Sacramento City Employees’ Retirement System (SCERS ). CalPERS is a multiple-employer public employee defined benefit pension plan. SCERS is a single-employer defined benefit pension plan.

All full-time and certain part-time City employees hired after January 28, 1977 and City safety employees, regar dless of date of hire, are eligible to participate in CalPERS. CalPERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members and their beneficiaries. CalPERS acts as a common investment and adminis trative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and City ordinance.

All full-time, non-safety employees hired before January 29, 1977, were eligible to participate in SCERS. SCERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by the City Charter.

The financial objective of a defined benefit pension plan is to fund the long-term cost of benefits provided to the plan participants. In order to assure that the plan is financially sustainable, the plan should accumulate adequate resources in a systematic and disciplined manner over the active service life of benefitting employees. This funding policy outlines the method the City will utilize to determine its actuarially determined contributions to fund the l ong-term cost of benefits to the plan participants and annuitants.

Pension Funding: A Gui de for Elected Officials, issued by eleven national groups including the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the International City/County Management Association, and the Government Finance Officers Association, established the following five general policy objectives for a pension funding policy:
402
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

1. Actuarially Determined Contributions. A pension funding plan should be based upon an actuarially determined contribution (ADC) that incorporates both the cost of benefits in the current year and the amortization of the plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability.

2. Funding Discipline. A commitment to make timely, actuarially determined contributions to the retirement system is needed to ensu re that sufficient assets are available for all current and future retirees.

3. Intergenerational equity. Annual contributions should be reasonably related to the expected and actual cost of each y ear of service so that the cost of employee benefits is paid by the generat ion of taxpayers who receives services from those employees.

4. Contributions as a stable percentage of payroll . Contributions should be managed so that employer costs remain consistent as a percentage of payroll over time.

5. Accountability and transparency. Clear reporting of pension funding should include an assessment of whether, how, and when the plan sponsor will ensure sufficient assets are available for all current and future retirees.

3. POLICY

3.1 CalPERS ADC

CalPERS actuaries will determine the City’s ADC to CalPERS based on annual actuarial valuations. The ADC will include the normal cost for current service and amortization of any under-funded amount. The normal cost will be calculated using the entry age normal cost method using economic and non- economic assumptions approved by the CalPERS Board of Administration.

The City will review the CalPERS annual actuarial valuations to validate the completeness and accuracy of the member census data and the reasonableness of the actuarial assumptions.

3.2 SCERS ADC
The City will determine its ADC to SCERS using the following principles:

a. The ADC will be calculated by an enrolled actuary and will include the normal cost for current service and amortization to collect any under- funded amount.
b. The normal cost will be calculated using the entry age normal cost method using the following assumptions:

403
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

i. Economic assumptions such as the investment rate of return and average salary increase will be reviewed with the actuary to confirm reflection of the best anticipated experience.
ii. Non-economic assumptions, such as rates of separation, disability, retirement, mortality, etc. shall be determined by City management in consultation with the actuary to reflect current experience. c. The un-funded actuarial accrued liability, or the difference between the accrued liability and actuarial value of assets, will be amortized over a declining number of years given the closed status of the plan. d. The actuarial value of assets will be determined using a 3-year smoothed market value to minimize volatility of the City’s ADC. e. The City’s ADC to SCERS will be stated in an annual contribution amount, rather than as a percentage of pay, given the closed status of the plan.

3.3 Transparency and Reporting
Funding of the City’s pension plans should be transparent to vested parties including plan participants, annuitants, the SCERS Administrative, Investment, and Fiscal Management (AIFM) Board, the City Council and Sacramento residents. In order to achieve this transparency, the following information shall be available:
a. Copies of the annual actuarial valuations for the City’s CalPERS plans shall be made available to the City Council.
b. A copy of the annual actuarial va luation for SCERS shall be made available to the City Council and the SCERS AIFM Board. c. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report shall be published on its website. This report includes information on the City’s annual contributions to the pension systems and their funded status. d. The City’s annual operating bud get shall include the City’s contributions to SCERS and CalPERS.

3.4 Review of Funding Policy
Funding a defined benefit pension plan requires a long-term horizon. As such, the City will review this policy at least every five years to determine if changes to this policy are needed to ensur e adequate resources are being accumulated.

)
404
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Risk Management Funding and Reserve Policy

Scope: CITYWIDE

Administrative Entity
Department of Finance
(916) 808-5845
[email protected]

Table of Contents

1. Purpose

2. Background

3. Policy

Related Regulatory References
Motion: 2015-0094 (May 15, 2015)

405
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Risk Management Funding and Reserve Policy

1. PURPOSE

The City’s Risk Management Funding Po licy documents the City’s approach to providing adequate financial re sources to fund the City’s General and Auto Liability and Workers Compensation Programs and es tablishing and maintaining adequate reserves in the Risk Management Internal Service Fund.

2. BACKGROUND

The City has been self-insured for worker s' compensation and for general and auto liability since 1971 and 1976, respectively. The General and Auto Liability and Workers Compensation Programs charge City Departments and funds for the costs of providing for claims, as well as for the cost of administering the claims.

3. POLICY

(a) In order to methodically and consis tently measure t he City’s projected claims, the City will contract with a professional outside actuary to prepare annual actuarial valuation reports for both categorie s of claims. Program funding will be based on the annual actuarial valuation reports. (b) The City’s funding policy will provi de program funding at the 80 percent confidence level, including recognition of anticipated investment income.

Confidence level is used by actuaries to determine the realistic possibilities that a given funding rate will be sufficient to cover all claims that might be incurred in any one program year. An 80 percent confidence level indicates that the funding rate should be adequate eight out of 10 years. (c) The City shall maintain a Risk Managem ent Reserve dedicated to mitigation of the risk of loss arising from potential claims and lawsuits against the City for general and auto liability as well as workers’ compensation claims. The Risk Management Reserve shall be funded at the following levels:

General and Auto Liability – In addition to annual funding of projected claims at the 80 percent confidence level, the City shall maintain a reserve equal to two Self-Insured Retention allotments.

Workers’ Compensation – In addition to annual funding of projected claims at the 80 percent confidence level, the City shall maintain a reserve equal to two SIR allotments.

If the SIR amount changes in future years, the two SI R allotments will continue to be the reserve requirement for both programs.

If either program maintains a bal ance above the minimum funding and reserve requirement, the excess reserves will be used to subsidize City 406
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

contributions over a 1- 5 year period depending upon the amount of the excess and the City’s economic condition.

If either program has excess claims requiring additional contributions to the fund, the City will increase contributions over a 1-3 year period depending on the amount of the shortfall and the Cit y’s economic condition to get to the minimum funding and reserve requirement.

If one program has excess reserves and the other program has a shortfall, transfers between programs may be implemented to reduce or eliminate the program shortfall.

407
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

408
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

29 SECTION - 29
Resources
409
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

410
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Glossary

Account - The primary accounting field in the budget used to describe the type of the financial transaction.

Actual - Actual level of expenditures/FTE positions approved for fiscal year as noted.

Amended - Level of expenditures/FTE positions reflecting adjustments made during the current fiscal year.

Appropriation - An authorization by the Council, which permits officials to incur obligations and expend City resources, for a specific purpose within a fiscal year.

Assessment - Revenue collected for City services that benefit properties in specific areas or districts.

Assessment District - A separate local government ag ency formed to provide specific services. Property owners within the Assessm ent District boundary pay the district in proportion to the benefits or services they receive.

Balanced Budget - The amount of budgeted expenditure s is equal to or less than the amount of budgeted revenues plus other available resources.

Beginning/Ending Fund Balance - Unencumbered resources av ailable in a fund from the prior/current year after payment of the prior/current year's expenses. Not necessarily cash on hand (also refer to Fund Balance).

Budget - An annual financial plan consisting of Proposed/Approved expenditures for specified purposes and the Proposed/Approved means of financing them.

California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) – The nation’s largest public pension fund, providing health and reti rement benefits to more than 1.6 million state, public school, and local public agency employees, retirees, and their families. The City contracts for retirement benefits only.

Capital Assets - Capital assets include land, improvements to land, easements, buildings, building improvements, vehicles , machinery, equipment, works of art and historical treasures, infrastructure, and all other tangible or intangible assets that are used in operations and that have initial useful lives extending beyond a single reporting period (fiscal year).

Capital Improvement - A specific undertaking involvin g procurement, construction or installation of facilities or related equipm ent that improves, preserves, enhances, or modernizes the City’s provision of municipal services, has a us eful life of at least five years, and costs in excess of $20,000. CIPs may include construction or major repair of City buildings and facilities such as streets, roads, storm drains, tr affic signals, parks, community centers, etc.
411
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - An ongoing five-year plan of single and multiple- year capital expenditures which is updated annually.

Carryover - Appropriated funds remaining unspent at the end of the fiscal year, which can be retained by the project to which they were appropriated so that they may be expended in the next fiscal year.

Charter Offices - City Attorney, City Auditor, City Clerk, Cit y Manager, and City Treasurer.

Citywide and Community Support - Program costs that do not relate to any one department, but represent costs of a general citywide nature, such as debt service.

Combined Sewer System (CSS) - Sewers that are designed to collect rainwater runoff, domestic sewage, and industrial wastewater in the same pipe. Combined sewer systems transport their wastewater to a sewage tr eatment plant, where it is treated and then discharged to a water body.

Community Facilities District (CFD): The Mello-Roos Act (1982) allows any county, city, special district, school district, or joint powers authority to establish a CFD that allows for financing of public improvem ents (e.g., sewers, streets) and services. To establish a CFD, voters within the district must approve its creation by two-thirds.

Debt Financing - Issuance of bonds and other debt instruments to finance municipal improvements and services.

Debt Service - The costs of paying the princi pal and interest on borrowed money according to a predetermined payment schedule.

Department - “Department” refers to the Counc il; City Manager; City Attorney; City Auditor, City Clerk; City Tr easurer; Convention and Cult ural Services; Community Development; Community Response; Financ e; Fire; Human Resources; Information Technology; Police; Public Works; Utilities; Youth, Parks, & Community Enrichment; and Citywide and Community Support.

Dept ID - A sub-unit of a department or division.

Division - A roll-up of units within a department. There are one or more units within a division.

Employee Services - The personnel costs of a City program, including wage/salary, direct and indirect benefits, such as health insu rance, social security costs, retirement contribution, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, etc.

Enterprise - A governmental facility or service that is self-supporting through fee and charge revenue.

412
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Enterprise Funds - These funds are used to account for operations for which it is the stated intent that the costs of providing services to the public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges and space rentals, e.g., Water Fund, Wastewater Fund (also known as the Sewer Fund).

Equipment - Capital outlay for tangible property of a relatively permanent nature, such as vehicles or equipment with a unit cost of $20,000 or more.

Expenditure Class - A roll-up of account s: employee services, services and supplies, property, debt service, and interdepartmental transfers.

Expenditure/Requirement - The actual spending of funds authorized by an appropriation. Expenditures are divided into the following “classes” of individual line items:
 Employee Services
 Services and Supplies
 Equipment
 Debt Service
 CIP or Gran t Labor Offset
 Capital Improvements

Externally Funded Program - Program revenues provided by external agencies which are restricted to a specified purpose.

Fiscal Year (FY) - A time period designated by t he City signifying the beginning and ending period for recording financial transactions. Sacramento has a fiscal year from July 1 through June 30, referred to as FY2022/23 or FY23.

Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) - A unit indicating the workl oad of a position in order to distinguish workloads comparabl e to a full-time position. An FTE of 1.0 means that the position is equivalent to a full-time workload, while an FTE of 0.50 signals that the position is half-time.

Fund - A group of related accounts used to main tain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives.

Fund Balance - The total dollars remaining after current expenditures for operations and capital improvements are s ubtracted from the sum of the beginning fund balance and current resources.

General Fund - The City's principal operating fund, which is supported by taxes and fees and which, generally, has no restrictions on its use. Expenditures may be described as discretionary and non-discretionary.
 Discretionary - That po rtion of the General Fund for which there are no restrictions on the use of the fees or taxes collected. 413
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Non-discretionary - Expenditure of revenues which are collected by users of a program to offset the cost of the program. Stat e law requires that fees charged cannot exceed the cost of the service.

Grant - Contributions of cash or other assets provided by ex ternal agencies, which are restricted to a specific purpose, have a time limit for use, and fr equently are reimbursed after incurring eligible costs.

Growth Rate - Level at which expenditures and re venues are expected to increase annually.

Impact - Effects on the service level provi ded by a particular program due to budget changes.

Indirect Costs - Those elements of cost necessary in the performance of a service that are not readily identified to the unit of service, such as administration, supplies, etc.

Internal Service Fund (ISF) - An ISF provides services to all City departments and bills the various other funds for services r endered. ISFs are self-supporting. Only the expenditure by the ISF is counted in budget totals; the internal transfer from the department to the ISF is excluded to avoid double-counting expenditures.

Internal Service Fund Transfer - A transfer from operating funds to an ISF, e.g., Risk Management or Fleet Management.

Labor/Supply Offset (CIP/Grant/Labor) - Amounts for employee salaries and benefits expected to be charged to a CIP or grant s, thus reimbursing the operating budget for these costs.

Measure U Fund – This fund was established to account for revenues collected from the transactions and use tax voted in on November 6, 2018 and took effect on April 1, 2019.

Measure U was approved as a general tax and can be used for any general government purpose. This one-cent tax is charged on each dollar of taxable sales of goods purchased from retailers within the Cit y of Sacramento, and on the taxable storage, use, or consumption of goods purchas ed outside the City and delivered to a location within the City.

Multi-year Operating Projects (MYOPs) – A project/program wit h funding for internal operations (e.g., community outreach, fleet acquisitions, grants, rebates, and studies) that do not result in capital assets.

Operating Budget - Annual appropriation of funds for ongoing program costs, including employee services, other services and supplies, equipment, and debt service.

Operating Transfers - Moving dollars from a fund receiving revenue to a fund which will expend the resources.

414
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Ordinance - A law or regulation made by a city or town government.

Other Governmental Funds - These funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific purposes, e.g., Gas Tax Fund, Traffic Safety Fund, Operating Grant fund.

Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) - Benefits that an employee will begin to receive at the start of retirement, not including pension benefits.

Proposition 218 - Passed by California voters in 1996, Propositi on 218 specifies requirements for how utility rates for water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste services are set and how the funds generated by those rates are used. Some of the requirements of include:

 Holding a public hearing pr ior to any rate changes for water, sewer, drainage, or solid waste services and notifying rate payers of that hearing via mail at least 45 days in advance.
 Using funds generated by a particular ra te, such as water rates, for water operations and projects.

Project, Child: - A project that falls under the budget appropriation authority of a parent project. Child projects are not required of a parent project.

Project, Parent: - A project that has budget appropriation authority given by Council.

Parent project numbers usually end in zero-zero (00).

Resolution - A formal declaration by Council.

Resources - Total dollars available for appropria tion during the fiscal year, including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning fund balances.

Revenues - Income received from seven categories:
 Taxes - Revenue including sales tax, pr operty tax, utility user tax, etc., collected to fund general operating City programs.
 Charges for Fees and Services - Fees charged to the user of any specific service provided by the City not suppor ted by the General Fund. The fee cannot exceed the cost of providing the service.
 Licenses and Permits - Revenues colle cted for construction, maintenance, and/or operation of designated equi pment, businesses, buildings, and private property including animals.
 Use of Money and Property - Intere st earned on City investments or county- held funds.
 Inter-Governmental - Revenue disburse ments from other agencies, such as State Motor Vehicle In-Lieu Tax and State Homeowners Property Tax Relief, and revenue reimbursement for services provided to other agencies. 415
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

 Fines, Forfeitures, and Penalties - Revenues collected for violations of City ordinances, late payments, etc.
 Miscellaneous Revenues - Revenues not categorized above.

Revenues can also be classified as operating or non-operating in the enterprise activities.

Operating revenues are directly related to the fund’s primary service activity and consist primarily of user fees and charges. Non-operating revenues are incidental to, or by- products of the enterprise’s prim ary service, such as interest income or the Transient Occupancy Tax for the Community Center Fund.

Services and Supplies - Costs of contractual or outside services, office supplies, and equipment.

Special Revenue Funds - These funds are used to account for activities supported by specific taxes or other revenue sources. T hese funds are generally required by statute, charter, or ordinance to finance specific government functions.

Successor Agency - Pursuant to operation of Califor nia state law, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved. Effective February 1, 2012, former activities and affairs of the Sacramento Redevelopment Agency were transformed to the City of Sacramento as the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency is authorized by law to accept and maintain the legal title, custody and dominion of records that were created by another agency.

Surplus - An excess of total current resources over total current requirements.

Total City Budget - The City’s total fiscal year expenditure budget (operating and capital) as approved by the Council.

Trust Funds - These funds are used to account for assets and activities restricted to a specific purpose in accor dance with a trust agreement, e.g., Ethel MacLeod Hart Trust Fund.

User Charges/Fees - The payment of a fee for direct receipt of a public service by the party benefiting from the service.

Variance - Change in expenditures or staffing levels between fiscal years.

416
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

ACRONYMS
A.B. Assembly Bill
ABCDs Automated Bids, Contracts, and Digital Signatures ACFR Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
ACH Automated Clearing House
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ALF American Leadership Forum
ALM Asset Liability Management
ALS Advanced Life Support
ARP American Rescue Plan 2021
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
ASES After School Education and Safety
AWMP Accelerated Water Meter Program
AWWA American Water Works Association
BID Business Improvement District
BOE Board of Education
BOT Business Operations Tax
BWC Body Worn Camera
CAA Cultural Arts Awards
CalPERS California Public Employees’ Retirement System
CASH Community Against Sexual Harm
CA-TF7 California Task Force 7
CBOT Cannabis Business Operations Tax
CCM Citywide Content Management
CCOMWP City/County Office of Metropolitan Water Planning CCPI CA Consumer Price Index
CCR Consumer Confidence Report
CCS Convention and Cultural Services
CDTFA CA Department of Tax and Fee Administration
CE Cultural Equity
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CERBT California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust
CFD Community Facilities District
CIO Chief Information Officer
CIP Capital Improvement Program or Project
CIRBs Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds
CIS Customer Information System
CIT Crisis Intervention Training
CLASS Childcare Learning and Student Support
CMO City Manager’s Office
CNG Compressed Natural Gas
CO2e Carbon Dioxide equivalent
COLA Cost of Living Adjustment
COPS Community Oriented Policing
CORE Cannabis Opportunity Reinvestment and Equity
417
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

CPI Consumer Price Index
CRCIP Community Reinvestment Capital Improvement Program CRS Community Rating System
CSH Center for Sacramento History
CSS Combined Sewer System
CSUS California State University Sacramento
DACs Disadvantaged Area Communities
DDW Department of Drinking Water
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DISTRICT SCU Convention & Performing Arts District
DMAs District Metered Areas
DOE Department of Education
DOU Department of Utilities
DSCR Development Stabilization Contingency Reserve
DSP Downtown Sacramento Partnership
DUI Driving Under the Influence
DWR Department of Water Resources
eCAPS Electronic Citywide Accounting and Personnel System EEO Equal Employment Office
EGUSD Elk Grove Unified School District
EIFD Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District
EIR Environmental Information Regulation
ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EOC Emergency Operations Center
ERP Enterprise Resources Planning
EUR Economic Uncertainty Reserve
EVOC Emergency Vehicle Operations Course
F.O.C.A.S. Friends of the City’s Animal Shelter
FDIC Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FEC Financial Empowerment Center
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FMAP Flood Maintenance Assistance Program
FTE Full-time equivalent
FUEL Family, Unity, Education, and Legal Network
FY Fiscal Year
G/MU General and Measure U
G1C Golden 1 Center
GARE Government Alliance on Race and Equity
GASB Governmental Accounting Standards Board
GL&AL General Liability and Auto Liability
HR Human Resources
ICMA International City/County Management Association
IRS Internal Revenue Service
ISA International Society of Arboriculture
418
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

IST Inspection and Standards Team
IT Information Technology
JPA Joint Powers Agreement
LAFCo Sacramento Local Agency Formation Commission
LDI Liability Driven Investment
LMA Local Maintaining Agencies
LPRs License Plate Readers
MG Million Gallons
MICC Mobile Incident Command Center
MOE Maintenance of Effort
MOFIE Mayor’s Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship MOSAC SMUD Museum of Science and Curiosity
MYOP Multi-year Operating Project
NACHA National Automated Clearing House Association
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OAC Office of Arts and Culture
OCM Office of Cannabis Management
OEG Office of Economic Growth
OEM Office of Emergency Management
OPEB Other Post-Employment Benefits
PAR Personnel Action Request
PARCS Parking Access and Revenue Control System
PBIDs Property and Business Improvement Districts
PCI Payment Card Industry
PCI DSS Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
PCR Patient Care Reports
PD Police Department
PELLET-B Police Entry Level Law Enforcement Test
PEPRA Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act
PERS California Public Employees’ Retirement System
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
PODs Police Observation Devices
POP Problem Oriented Policing
POS Point-of-Sale
POST Police Officers Standard and Training
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
PPP Public-Private Partnerships
PRAs Public Records Act
PRISM Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management PTTVC Prime-Time Teen Virtually Connected
RAILS Rapid Acceleration, Innovation & Leadership
RASA Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency
REO Recognized Employee Organization
RFP Request for Proposal
RGEAP Race and Gender Equity Action Plan
419
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

RSW Recycling and Solid Waste Division
SACOG Sacramento Area Council of Governments
SAFER Staffing for Adequate Fire & Emergency Response Grants SAMS Software Asset Management System
SASD Sacramento Area Sewer District
SAVSA Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority
S.B. Senate Bill
SCADA Supervising Control and Data Acquisition
SCERS Sacramento City Employees’ Retirement System
SCMS Security Camera Monitoring System
SCU SAFE Credit Union
SCUSD Sacramento City Unified School District
SCVB Sacramento Convention and Visitors Bureau
SCXEA Sacramento City Exempt Employees Association
SETA Sacramento Employment and Training Agency
SHRA Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency
SMAC Sacramento Metropolitan Arts Commission
SMHST Sacramento Museum of History, Science, and Technology SMUD Sacramento Municipal Utility District
SPCA Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
SPLA Sacramento Public Library Authority
SRCSD Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District
SRF State Revolving Fund
SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflows
START Students Today Achieving Results for Tomorrow
STEAM Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math
SURA Sacramento Utility Rate Assistance
SUV Sport Utility Vehicle
SWA Solid Waste Authority
SWAT Special Weapons and Tactics
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TOT Transient Occupancy Tax
UAL Unfunded Accrued Liability
UAS Unmanned Aerial System
UHU Unit Hour Utilization
URAC Utility Rate Advisory Commission
US&R Urban Search & Rescue
UUT Utility User Tax
VLF Vehicle License Fee
VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol
VPN Virtual Private Network
WC Workers’ Compensation
YDPM Youth Development Program Manager
YPCE Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment

420
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

30 SECTION - 30
Resolution
421
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

422
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

RESOLUTION NO 2022-XXXX

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

June 14, 2022

Approving the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Operating and
Capital Improvement Program Budgets

BACKGROUND
A. Article IX, section 111, of the City Charter requires th e City Manager to present a balanced budget to the Mayor and City Council no less than 60 days before the beginning of each fiscal year.

B. The City of Sacramento, through the leadership and direction of the Mayor and City Council, has maintained a sustainable budget philosophy. Given this concept of fiscal sustainability, the City Council adopted the following core budget policies and budget guidelines on February 14, 2017 (Resolution 2017- 0078):

Core Budget Policies

1. City Council must adopt a balanced budget.

2. Funding decisions should be cons istent with Council-adopted policies.

3. The Economic Uncertainty Reserve shal l be maintained at a minimum of 10% of budgeted General Fund revenues. Resources must be added to maintain this level through the budget and midyear processes, as necessary.

Budget Guidelines

1. Maintain a fiscally sustainable, balanced budget.

2. The Mayor and Council’s priorities, based on community input, should drive the budget creation.

3. Continue a community-based budget pr ocess where city residents are engaged and educated on budget processes and provide feedback on budget priorities.

4. Look for ways to grow the reserve beyond its current goal.

5. All budget actions must be considered in a five-year context, with new revenues not counted or spent until realized. One-time resources should be used for one- time needs, not ongoing expenses.

6. Do not make spending decisions in isolation. Avoid spending money on one-off projects or without looking at th e big picture. Understand long-term consequences and opportunity costs.

7. Keep City Council informed on the fisca l condition of t he City and conduct continuous evaluations for efficiencies and effectiveness. 423
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

8. The City must consistently look for oppor tunities to proactively grow revenues instead of simply being reactive.

9. Make every effort to identify priv ate financing or feder al and state grant opportunities before using City resources. Pursue new and enhance existing revenue sources.

10. Before new expenditures are made, identify return on investments and impacts, fiscal and social benefits.

11. Address unfunded lo ng-term liabilities.

12. Remain a full-service City.

C. On June 11, 2019, the City’s Economic Uncertainty Reserve (EUR) Policy was amended to include Measure U resources in determining the amount to be set aside in reserves (Resolution 2019-0248) as dire cted by the City Counc il on February 5, 2019 (Resolution 2019-0047).

D. The FY2022/23 Proposed Budget (which includes the Operating Budget and the Capital Improvement Program [CIP] Bu dget) are consistent with City Charter requirements and the City Council’s adop ted Core Budget Policies and Budget Guidelines.

E. The Mayor and Council conducted budget discussions during May and June 2022 to discuss and consider the City’s FY2022/23 Budget.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Preliminary Matters.

1.1. The Budget changes attached as Exhibi t A, and the Summary of FTE attached as Exhibit B are hereby approved.

1.2. The FY2022/23 Operating and CIP Budg ets (collectively the Approved Budget), as defined in section 3.1 below, and a ttached as Exhibit C and D are hereby approved.

1.3. The 2022-2027 CIP, which provides a comprehensive five-year plan for the City’s capital project expenditures and attached as Exhibit D is hereby approved.

1.4. Sections 2 through 20 below, which def ine the authority and responsibilities of the City Manager in implementing the Approved Budget, are hereby approved.

1.5. The City Manager is authorized to incor porate final decisions of the Council, and to refine and add content, as may be needed to meet Government Finance Officers Association and California Soci ety of Municipal Finance Officers budgeting-award requirements into the Proposed O perating and CIP Budgets to create the FY2022/23 Approved Budget.

1.6. The attached Exhibits A thr ough D are part of this resolution. 424
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

1.7. The City’s Debt service must be lim ited to 6% of total General and Measure U (G/MU) Fund revenues, excluding Department revenues.

1.8. The City Treasurer shall conduct a financial stress test on the combined G/MU Funds before the issuance of any bonds.

1.9. Available resources in the Innovation and Growth Fund (Fund 2031) shall be transferred to the General Fund as needed to offset projected deficits shown in the G/MU Fund five-year forecast included in the Approved Budget.

1.10. The City Manager is authorized to es tablish the Federal American Rescue Plan (ARP) Fund (Fund 2705) effective May 19, 2021.

1.11. The City Manager is authorized to tr ansfer available General Fund (Fund 1001) resources in the Youth, Parks and Community Enrichment Department on June 30, 2021, to address year-end shortfalls in the 4th R Fund (Fund 6012).

1.12. The City Manager is aut horized to realign Measure U expenditures, including the creation of new multi-year projects as necessary, to provide additional transparency on the alignment of spending on a go-forward basis beginning with the FY2022/23 Approved Budget.

Section 2. Scope.

This resolution defines the authority and responsibilities of the City Manager in implementing the Approved Budget and supersedes Resolution No. 2021-0198.

Section 3. Definitions.

3.1. “Account” is the primary accounting field in the budget used to describe the nature of the financial transaction (overtime, professional services, debt, etc.).

3.2. “Approved Budget” means the Approved Operating Budget (Operating Budget) and the Approved Capital Budget (CIP B udget), which are attached as Exhibit D and reflects the FY2022/23 Proposed Operating and CIP Budgets, as amended by the Council to incorporate the approved Budget Changes attached as Exhibit A, and a summary of position changes as displayed in Exhibit B.

3.3. “City Manager” means t he City Manager or, if so des ignated, the Director of Finance.

3.4. “Department” means refers to Ma yor and City Council; City Manager; City Attorney; City Auditor; City Clerk; Cit y Treasurer; Community Development; Community Response; Convention and Cultural Services; Finance; Fire; Human Resources; Information Technology; Police; Public Works; Utilities; Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment; and Citywide and Community Support.

3.5. “Full Time Equivalent” and “FTE” mean the decimal equival ent of a position, e.g., one full-time position is 1.00 FTE and one quarter-time position is 0.25 FTE.

425
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Section 4. Approved Budget Appropr iations, FTEs, and Adjustments.

4.1. The City Manager is authorized to make any expenditure and resource adjustments to the Operating Budget based on final Council action to adopt the Operating Budget.

4.2. The City Manager is authorized to establish the appropriations and FTE as shown in Schedules 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D and the fund summaries, including transfers, as shown in Schedules 2A, 2B, and 2C, as displayed in Exhibit C.

4.3. The City Manager is authorized to modi fy FTE classifications by Department as necessary to implement the reclassi fications and studies authorized by Schedule 8, as displayed in Exhibit C.

4.4. The City Manager is authorized to re vise any appropriation made in the Approved or Amended Budget where the revision is of a technical nature and is consistent with the Council’s intent.

4.5. The City Manager may aut horize the use of the Old Sacramento Public Market Fund (Fund 2601) for the development, r epair, and maintenance of the north and south public markets.

4.6. The City Manager is authorized to ma ke annual loan payments to the Risk Fund from the Community Center Fund subject to the availability of funds. As of June 30, 2021, the balance of the Risk Fund lo an to the Community Center Fund totaled approximately $5.2 million.

4.7. Following budget adoption, the City Manager is authorized to do the following:
(A) Transfer appropriations from the operating budget and establish or adjust revenue and expenditure budgets for externally funded programs (EFPs), multi-year operating projects (MYOPs), and operating grants as shown in Schedule 9 displayed in Exhibit C.
(B) Adjust any appropriation made in t he Approved Budget to reflect changes from amounts budgeted for updated labor (for example, changes in retirement rates, payroll taxes, heal th benefits), fleet (including accident recovery costs), utilities, 311 Call C enter (reimbursements based on call data), cost plan, and risk-management changes, from available fund balance or reserves for the respective funds.
(C) Adjust budgets to reflect all requi red debt service and related payments, including adjustments to rate stabilization reserves, pursuant to City debt agreements.
(D) Revise and establish indirect cost ra tes to be applied to hourly salary rates in order to achieve full cost recovery of services; and adjust the Operating Budget to reflect the indirect cost rate plan for FY2022/23.

426
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Section 5. Economic Uncertainty R eserve Policies and Transfers from Contingency and Reserve Funds.

5.1. The Council-adopted E UR Policy as amended on February 5, 2019 (Resolution 2019-0248) establishes a minimum reserve level equal to 10% of annual G/MU Fund revenues and a target reserve leve l equal to two months of regular ongoing General Fund expenditures, includi ng transfers (17% of G/MU Fund expenditures). Resources to fund this reserve will be identified on an ongoing basis and can include positive year-end re sults or other one-time resources available to the G/MU Fund.

5.2. The G/MU Fund EUR is maintained to bridge the gap between projected revenue and expenditures during periods of significant revenue declines, expenditure growth, or both. Consis tent with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54 (Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions), the Council-adopted parameters for using the EUR are as follows:
(A) The City Manager may recommend a re lease from the EUR when the gap between projected revenue and expenditures is greater than $1 million in the proposed budget.
(B) Any release from the EUR r equires the Council’s approval. (C) These parameters may only be changed by resolution of the Council.

5.3. The City Manager is aut horized to make appropriation changes (increases or decreases) less than $250,000 by fund from available fund balance.

Appropriation changes, whether increases or decreases, including $250,000 or more require the Council’s approval, e xcept for payments to employees for vacation and sick leave payouts. Payments to employees for vacation and sick leave payout may be approved by the City Manager.

5.4. The City Manager is aut horized to make appropriation changes (increases or decreases) less than $250,000 to any Department or project from Administrative Contingency established in the Gener al Fund. Appropriation changes (increases and decreases) more than and including $250,000 to the Department or project require the Council’s approval.

5.5. Transfers must not be made from an available f und balance or Administrative Contingency if the transfer will result in a negative balance.

5.6. The City Manager is authorized to re lease the General Fund (Fund 1001) and Measure U (2401) commitment of fund balance ($22.8 m illion) established in FY2021/22 for future budget development as needed to submit a balanced budget.

5.7. Use of committed fund balance reserves , except as authoriz ed in section 5.6, requires the Council’s approval by resolution.

427
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Section 6. Appropriati on Increases and Decreases.

6.1. All appropriation changes (increases or decreases) $250,000 or more to the Approved Budget require the Council’s approval by resolution.

6.2. The City Manager is authorized, upon completion of the audited financial statements for FY2021/22, to adjust FY2022/23 fund contingencies by the amount of net changes in available fund balance. The available fund balance in the G/MU Fund must be included and expl ained in the report to the Council accompanying the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR).

6.3. Residual balances from unexpended debt proceeds will be reverted to the appropriate fund and used for the lawful purposes as specified in the conditions of the debt issuance. The City Manager is authorized to establish appropriations and account for the expenditure of these unexpended proceeds.

Section 7. Appropriation Transfers.

7.1. Operating appropriation transfers within the same Department and the same fund, including the Department’s est ablished fleet MYOP, require the City Manager’s approval.

7.2. Appropriation transfers between two or more Departments, less than $250,000, must be approved by the City Manager. Such transfers more than and including $250,000 requires the Council’s approval by resolution.

Section 8. Staffing Changes.

8.1. Any increase or decrease in FTE by department or by fund as authorized in the Operating Budget, by subsequent approval of the Council, or by the City Manager in accordance with this resolution, is subject to approval by the Council except for renewals or expansion of fully offset grants or EFPs as specified in section 8.2.

8.2. The City Manager is authorized to adjust staffing levels for renewals, expansions, or reductions to fully o ffset Council-approved operating grants or EFPs. Grant/EFP positions must be terminated upon completion or cancellation of the grant/EFP unless specifically c ontinued by a Council resolution that includes a source of repl acement funding. Any existi ng positions approved on the assumption that the City would rece ive a grant or other reimbursements must have continued funding verified before filling the position.

8.3. Any reassignment of authorized FTE and employee-services funding associated with the FTE, within a Department and withi n the same fund, may be made at the discretion of the Department director with the approval of the City Manager as long as there is no net change to authorized FTE and funding levels.

8.4. The City Manager is author ized to modify any authorized FTE classification as necessary to reflect current incumbent status based on the established flexibly staffed classifications included in Council-approved labor contracts. 428
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

8.5. All new job classifications or classi fication changes (as identified in Exhibit C, Schedule 8) are subject to classification review and approval by the Director of Human Resources.

8.6. The City Manager is authorized to adjus t staffing levels in the Police and Fire Training Academies based on projected vacancies.

8.7. The Director of Human Resources is authorized to establish non-budgeted positions (NBPs) for the following:
(A) Mayor and Council Offices, to be funded from their existing operations budgets.
(B) Departments as needed to reflect cu rrent staffing needs. Departments must have sufficient labor savings to cover the cost of NBPs, and none of the NBPs may be used for more than one year. Departments will seek budget authority to convert NBPs to authorized FTE positions or the NBPs will be eliminated during the budget process.

Section 9. Revenue Budget.

9.1. The FY2022/23 revenue budget is su mmarized in Exhibit C, Schedule 6.

9.2. Any increase or dec rease greater than (and including) $250,000 by fund in estimated revenue by Department to th e Approved Budget requires the Council’s approval.

9.3. The City Manager is authorized to implement biennial Consumer Price Index increases if the increases are warranted based on the adopted Fees and Charges Policy.

9.4. Proceeds from t he sale of General Fu nd and Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency surplus land, unless otherwise specified, will be budgeted in the Innovation and Growth Fund (Fund 2031).

9.5. Unbudgeted one-time general revenue re ceived in a fiscal year, which is not required to balance the budget as part of th e midyear review or fiscal year-end close, will be added to the G/MU Fund EUR.

Section 10. Capital Improvements.

10.1. Capital projects and/or appropriations will be used for the following:
(A) Repairs, maintenance, improvements, or acquisitions with a total cost of at least $20,000 and a useful life that exceeds one fiscal year; and (B) Community/Neighborhood projects as approved in separate resolutions by the Council.

10.2. The Council’s approval is required for the establishment or cancellation (without completion) of a CIP, except as provided below:
429
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(A) The City Manager is authorized to approve and establish one or more capital projects for internal City oper ations related to improvements and minor construction of existing City-owned or occupied buildings if the total cost to deliver each project is less than $250,000. Projects will be managed in the City Facility Improvement (C15100000) project. (B) Capital projects may be subdivided into separate sub-projects as needed to administer, manage, and deliver the original scope of the project, without further Council action.
(C) Projects established for agreem ents the City Manager executes in accordance with Sacramento City Code chapter 18.18. The City Manager is authorized to make all necessary budgetary adjustments when the City accepts improvements constructed under these agreements.

10.3. Capital appropriations mu st be used solely for the or iginally approved project or projects except as provided in this section.

10.4. Completed and inactive projects will be closed annually, except for projects that have existing litigation or payment disputes. An inactive project is one where transaction activity is less than $1,000 over the prior three years. Closures are the responsibility of the desi gnated project manager. The managing department and the City M anager are each authorized to process the necessary documentation to close inactive projects.

10.5. Each fiscal year, all mu lti-year CIP projects in existence on June 30 will be continued except as provided otherwise in section 10.4. The FY2022/23 CIP Budget is summarized on Schedules 2 and 4 as displayed in Exhibit C and on Schedule 4 as displayed in Exhibit D.

10.6. Each fiscal year, unobligated appropriations for all inactive projects, as defined in section 10.4, will expire on June 30 follo wing the third full year of the last appropriation to the project. Projects r equiring continuing appropriations will require Council action through progra mming within the CIP or through a separate appropriation to the project authorized by resolution of the Council.

10.7. Each fiscal year, on June 30, the balanc e of each CIP project must be zero or have a positive balance by fund. Projects with spending in excess of available budget from all funding sources (i.e., with negative balance) will be treated as follows:
(A) If the CIP balance exceeds budget by less than $250,000, the CIP must first be corrected within each fund, and then any remaining negative balance must be corrected by a tr ansfer from the CIP manager’s Operating Budget (all transfers less than $250,000 must be made as provided for in section 5.3).
(B) If expenditures exceed the budget by more than and including $250,000, a corrective plan of action must be subm itted to the Council for approval by resolution.
430
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

10.8. Community/Neighborhood projects and appropriations established with one- time funding sources under Resoluti on No. 2000-682 (11/21/00), 2001-765 (11/20/01), 2003-412 (6/17/ 03), 2004-551 (6/29/04), 2 006-367 (5/23/06), and associated staff reports, are governed by the following procedures:
(A) Savings of up to and including $5 0,000 due to lower-than-expected costs or the securing of alternative fundi ng sources may be administratively reprogrammed into other projects withi n the same Council District at the request of the Council District Offi ce and with the approval of the City Manager.
(B) Savings above $50,000 may be r eprogrammed upon approval by resolution of the Council.

10.9. Except as provided in section 10.8, the City Manager is authorized to transfer appropriations less than $250,000 as follows:
(A) General, Measure U, and Capital Bond Funds:
(1) From a project that has not been completed, if a revised project estimate confirms that upon completion there will be project savings. (B) All other funds from Project A to Project B if:
(1) Project A is complete and has savings; or
(2) Project A has not been complet ed and a revised project estimate confirms that there will be project savings upon completion.

10.10. Upon completion and closure of a capital project, the City Manager is authorized to transfer any remaining project balance as follows:
(A) To the available fund balance of the respective fund, the Capital Projects Base Reserve in the Utilit ies CIP or, in the case of the General Fund, Administrative Contingency; or in the case of capital grants, to amend the revenue and expenditure budgets to actual revenues received and expenditures incurred.
(B) As provided for in section 10.9.

10.11. Except for projects covered by se ction 10.10, the City Manager is authorized to increase or decrease project budget appropriations by less than $250,000 for each project. Appropriation changes mo re than and including $250,000 in total for any project must be approved by resolution of the Council. The City Manager’s administrative authority to adjust budgets for capital projects will be reset after budgetary actions are authorized by the Council. If the appropriation is from available fund balance, it is subject to the provisions in section 5.

10.12. Measure A Sales Tax (Fund 2001) revenue and expenditure budgets can be loaded into the City’s financial system before approval by the Sacramento Transportation Authority Board (STA Board). Work on CIP projects in this fund 431
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

is done before receiving funding. Projec t funding and appropriations must be as follows:
(A) The City Manager is authorized to enter the revenue and expenditure budgets as reflected in the Approved Budget (revenues) and CIP Budget (expenditures).
(B) The City Manager is authorized to enter revenue and expenditure budgets before STA Board approval.
(C) STA Board approval is required for all Measure A reallocations. When the Council acts on recommended Measure A reallocations before STA Board action, Council approval will be contingent on STA Board approval.

10.13. Projects funded by New Measure A Project Construction Sales Tax are included within the CIP Budget for pl anning purposes. Work on CIP projects funded by New Measure A Project Construction Sales Tax (Fund 2023) is done before receiving funding, and projec t funding and authorization for these projects must be as follows:
(A) Fund 2023 revenue and expenditure budgets will not be loaded into the City’s financial system until STA Board approval and Council appropriation through separate Council action.

10.14. Projects funded by the following reim bursable (grant) funds are included within the Operating and CIP Budgets for pl anning purposes: Funds 3702, 3703, 3704, 6205, 6206, 6207, and 6211. Work on CI Ps funded by these sources is done before receiving funding, and project funding and authorization for these projects must be as follows:
(A) Funds 2700, 3702, 3703, 3704, 6205, 6206, 62 07, and 6211. Revenue and expenditure budgets will not be loaded into the City’s financial system until agreements (Program Supplements/E-76s, Individual Project Agreements, Cooperative Agreements, etc.) have been executed by the City and the funding authority.
(B) Funds 3703 and 3704. The City is eligible to receive federal or state funding, or both, for certain transportation projects through the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans ). Master Agre ements, Program Supplemental Agreements, Fund Exchange Agreements, and Fund Transfer Agreements must be execut ed by Caltrans bef ore such funds can be claimed. The City Manager is authorized to execute on the City’s behalf all Master Agreements, Program Supplemental Agreements, Fund Exchange Agreements, and Fund Tr ansfer Agreements, and any amendments thereto.

The City Manager is authorized to trans fer matching funds as specified in the approved CIP from the state and federal Grant Match (T15007200) CIP, and to enter the revenue and ex penditure budgets as reflected in the grant agreement, only if the amount differs by less than $250,000 from what was reflected in the Approved CIP Budget that authorized the 432
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

project funding. Project agreements that differ by more than and including $250,000 from the anticipated budget requi re the Council’s approval by resolution.

10.15. The 2022-2027 CIP Budget (S chedule 4, Exhibits C a nd D) includes projects that are directly supported by user and developer fees and utility rebates. The City Manager is authorized to adjus t department revenue budgets and CIP expenditure budgets for projects as ident ified in the General Government section of the CIP that are directly supported by fees and rebates based on the actual fees and rebates collected, le ss any operating costs associated with delivering the service.

10.16. The City Manager is authorized to adjust revenue and expenditure budgets to reflect actual revenues received and expenditures incurred in compliance with the original grant award and any amendments. If the grant is not renewed or is changed by more than and including $250,000, the managing department must return to the Council for corrective action.

Section 11. Operating Grants.

11.1. Council approval is required for the establishment or cancellation (without completion) of an operating grant except as follows:
(A) Where the operating grant is less than $250,000 and does not require any of the following:
(1) any increase or decrease, by department or by fund, in FTE as authorized in the Approved Budget or by any subsequent approval by the Council or the City Manager in accordance with this resolution;
(2) matching funds from City resources; or
(3) any ongoing service or funding by the City.
(B) The City Manager is authorized to establish operating grants and authorize spending and allocation of resources more than and including $250,000 in advance of formal agreements in response to governmental requests for public-safety assistance related to homelessness, disasters and national-security risks. The department responding to these events shall report to the Council within 60 da ys after receiving formal program documents from the r equesting governmental agency or agencies to obtain approval to enter into agreements and accept reimbursements. (C) Operating grants may be subdivided into separate sub-projects as needed to administer, manage, and deliver the original scope of the project, without further Council action.

11.2. The City Manager is authorized to adjust FTE and associated service and supplies budget, in accordance with section 8.2, for renewals or expansions of fully offset grants previously approved by the Council. 433
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

11.3. If a grantor requires Council action as a condition of funding the grant, the establishment of the grant requires the Council’s approval regardless of the grant amount.

11.4. Each fiscal year, all multi-year ope rating grant budgets in existence on June 30 will be continued in the next fiscal year.

11.5. The City Manager is authorized to adjust rev enue and expenditure budgets for renewals, up to the amount previously approved by the Council, and augmentations less than $250,000 of fully offset grants.

11.6. The City Manager is authorized to establish revenue and expenditure budgets for federal or state gr ant-funded youth programs and parks-and-recreation programs based on the prior year award before receipt of signed agreements.

Project funding and appropriations must be adjusted based on the final grant agreement. If the grant is not renewed or is changed by more than and including $250,000, the managing department must return to the Council for corrective action.

11.7. Each fiscal year, on June 30, the balance of each grant budget must be zero or have a positive balance by fund. Grants in excess of the budget from all funding sources (total budget has a negative balance) will be treated as follows:
(A) If the Grant balance exceeds budget by less than $250,000, the Grant must first be corrected within each fund, and then any remaining negative balance must be corrected by a tr ansfer from the Grant manager’s Operating Budget (all transfers of less than $250,000 must be made as provided for in section 5.3).
(B) If the project balance exceeds budget by more than and including $250,000, a corrective plan of action must be submitted to the Council for approval by resolution.

11.8. The City Manager is authorized to adjust grant and operating expenditure budgets to account for Council-approved grant match and retention obligations.

11.9. The City Manager is authorized to adjust revenue and expenditure operating grant budgets to reflect actual rev enues received and expenditures incurred upon closure of a project in compliance with the original grant award and any amendments.

11.10. Award and Distribution of City Grants.
(A) Council approval is required: (1) to award grants to an individual, non- profit, business, or community-based organization that applies for a City grant more than and including $250, 000; and (2) to execute contracts with the grantees for the services to be provided.
(B) Consistent with Counc il direction, the City Manager is authorized: (1) to award grants to an individual, non-profit, business, or community- based organization that applies for a City grant in amounts less than $250,000; 434
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

and (2) to execute contra cts with the grantees fo r the services to be provided.
(C) The award and distributi on of grants must comply with any Citywide Grant Distribution Policy.
(D) Before grant funds are distributed , the City and the grantee must execute a City contract that outlines the public benefit, timelines, and reporting requirements.
(E) The annual budget must list all grants awarded the previous calendar year.

Section 12. Externally Funded Programs (EFP).

12.1. Council approval is required for the establishment or cancellation (without completion) of an EFP, except as follows:
(A) Where the EFP is less than $25 0,000 and does not require any of the following:
(1) any increase or decrease, by department or by fund, in FTE as authorized in the Approved Budget or by any subsequent approval by the Council or by the City Manager in accordance with this resolution;
(2) matching funds from City resources; or
(3) any ongoing service or funding by the City.
(B) EFPs may be subdivided into separ ate sub-projects as needed to administer, manage, and deliver the original scope of the project, without further Council action.

12.2. Each fiscal year, all multi-year EFP budgets in existence on June 30 will be continued in the next fiscal year.

12.3. The City Manager is authorized to adjust rev enue and expenditure budgets for EFP renewals, up to the amount pr eviously approved by Council, and augmentations less than $250,000.

12.4. Each fiscal year, on June 30, the bal ance of each EFP budget must be zero or have a positive balance by fund. EFPs in excess of the budget from all funding sources (total budget has a negative balance) will be treated as follows:
(A) If the EFP balance exceeds budget by less than $250,000, the EFP must first be corrected within each fund, and then any remaining negative balance must be corrected by a transfer from the EFP manager’s Operating Budget (all transfers of less than $250,000 must be made as provided for in section 5.3).
435
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(B) If the project balance exceeds budget by more than and including $250,000, a corrective plan of action shall be submitted to the Council for approval by resolution.

12.5. EFPs with existing contracts appr oved by the Council, funding ongoing operations and studies, can be adjusted annually (revenues and expenditures) based on the actual revenues received.

Section 13. Multi-Year Operating Projects (MYOP).

13.1. A MYOP is used for the following:
(A) Economic Development Assistance and Development Programs (e.g., inclusionary housing).
(B) Planning, audit, and other consultant studies that will take more than one fiscal year to complete.
(C) Department fleet (vehicle or equip ment) acquisition charges from the Fleet Management internal service fund.
(D) Other projects and activities that are multi-year in nature and are not capital-improvement projects.

13.2. Council approval is required for the establishment or cancellation (without completion) of a MYOP, except as provided in section 13.7.

13.3. MYOPs may be subdivided into separat e sub-projects as needed to administer, manage, and deliver the original scope of the project, without further Council action.

13.4. Each fiscal year, unobl igated appropriations in ex istence on June 30 for existing MYOPs will be continued in the next fiscal year, except as noted in sections 13.10, 13.11, and 18.11.

13.5. MYOPs must be used solely for the originally approved program or study.

Completed or inactive MYOPs will be closed annually. An inactive project is one where transaction activity is less t han $1,000 over the prior three years.

Closures are the responsib ility of the designat ed project manager. The managing department and the City Manager each have the authority to process the necessary documentation to close inactive projects.

13.6. The Police and Fire Departments ar e authorized to use Measure U MYOPs savings from vacancies for background investigations, recruit academies, and overtime associated with restored programs and operations.

13.7. The City Manager is aut horized to establish and adjust budgets for private development activities (Funds 2016 and 2018) managed in MYOPs that are fully offset by development fees.
436
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

13.8. Each fiscal year, on June 30, the bal ance of each MYOP must be zero or have a positive balance by fund. Projects in excess of the budget from all funding sources (total budget has a negative balance) will be treated as follows:
(A) If the MYOP balance exceeds budget by less than $250,000, the MYOP must first be corrected within each fund, and then any remaining negative balance must be corrected by a tr ansfer from the MYOP manager’s Operating Budget (all transfers of less than $250,000 must be made as provided for in section 5.3).
(B) If the MYOP balance exceeds budget by more than and including $250,000, a corrective plan of action must be submitted to the Council for approval by resolution.

13.9. The City Manager is authorized to increase or decrease MYOP budget appropriations by less than $250,000 for ea ch project. Transfers that exceed and including $250,000 in total for any MYOP require the Council’s approval by resolution.

13.10. The City Manager is authorized to review MYOPs on an annual basis and return excess funds to the fund balance or contingency of the respective fund (e.g., Fleet, Measure U, Utility Rate Assistance).

13.11. The Utility Box Artwork (I17000800) MYOP General Fund budget can be amended up to $450,000 ($50,000 for each Councilmember and the Mayor) based on requests and resources provided from the operations budgets of the person requesting.

13.12 MYOPs with existing contracts appr oved by the Council funding ongoing operations and studies, can be adjusted annually (revenues and expenditures) based on the actual revenues received.

Section 14. In-Lieu Property Taxes and In-Lieu Franchise Fee.

An in-lieu property tax and in-lieu franchise fee are hereby imposed on the Community Center (Fund 6010) and Parking (Fund 6004) Funds in the amounts provided in Schedule 3 as displayed in Exhibit C. The Council finds that the in-lieu property tax as detailed in Schedule 3 represents the proper ty-tax revenue that would be received by the General Fund if the real and personal property owned by these enterprises were taxable under private ownership. The in-lieu franchise fee as detailed in Schedule 3 represents the franchise fees that the City would receive from private entities as a rental or a toll for the use of city streets and rights-of-way.

Section 15. Appropriation Limits.

The appropriation limit and the appropriations subject to the limit are hereby amended in accordance with article XIIIB of the California Constitution for FY2022/23, as detailed in Schedule 5 as displayed in Exhibit C.

437
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Section 16. Midyear Report.

16.1. The City Manager shall present a Midyear Budget Report including a revised estimate of the financial condition of all funds, estimated revenues and expenditures, and recommendations for eliminating any projected fund deficits to the Council.

16.2. The Council will act on any projected f und deficits as part of the midyear review.

Section 17. Adjustments for Revenue Offset Programs and Services.

17.1. The City Manager is authorized to adjust revenue and expenditure budgets in special revenue funds based on actual revenues collected to provide appropriation authority for operating co sts associated with delivering the service.

17.2. The City Manager is authorized to make the following adjustments to Department Operating Budgets or fund balance:
(A) Adjust Fire Department revenue and expenditure budgets based on actual revenues received for Department strike-team services provided throughout California.
(B) Adjust operating department revenue and expenditure budgets based on actuals revenues received for providing reimbursable services to the Golden 1 Center as outlined in the City’s agreement to provide services. (C) Adjust the revenue budget for t he Sacramento Police Department’s Secondary Employment Program to reflect actual revenues received and adjust the expenditure budget by a like amount for providing reimbursable services as outlined in the City’s Secondary Employment Agreement.
(D) Adjust the revenue and expenditure budgets for facility maintenance and repair services provided to outsi de agencies and entities (15004521- 338020) and for private property c oncrete maintenance and sidewalk repairs (15001641-343010) to reflect actual revenues received for these services.
(E) Increase the revenue (Account 391320) and fleet-replacement expenditure (Account 474210) budgets in the Fleet Fund (Fund 6501) based on departmental fleet purchasi ng changes (additional or early replacement) approved by the Council during the fiscal year and upon completion of audited financial st atements to allow the continued purchasing of prior-year-funded replacement vehicles.
(F) Transfer excess parking-meter revenue from the General Fund (Fund 1001) to cover eligible costs that are incurred in the Parking Fund (Fund 6004) if the full costs of the current fiscal-year operations for parking meters has been recovered and the department has a positive net year- end results.
438
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(G) The Rental Housing Inspection Progr am Fees are established to recover the costs of the program. If the full cost of the current-year operations for that program have been recovered, then excess revenues for the program will be committed to fund a reserve equal to one year’s revenue budget for the program.

If these operations do not achieve t he budgeted revenues or if program costs exceed the program budget, then resources must be transferred from the commitment of fund balance for the Rental Housing Inspection Program to cover the shortfall.
(H) Adjust the 4th R Fund (Fund 601 2) revenue and expenditure budgets as needed to deliver programs, based on actual revenues received. (I) Adjust the revenue budget fo r the Community Development Department’s Housing Trust and Housing Impact administrative fees to reflect actual revenues received and increase the expenditure budget by a like amount in the General Plan Update (I22000000) MYOP. (J) Increase the Garcia Bend Park Project (L19703600) based on the actual revenues received from increased boat launch ramp fees at Garcia Bend Park, provided that the Department has positive net revenues after all Parking Services Division costs related to the Garcia Bend launch ramp are paid.
(K) Adjust the Police Department re venue and expenditure budgets based on actual revenues received for mutual aid provided to other jurisdictions.

(L) Establish Department of Utility revenue and expenditure budgets for any projects that result from an ex isting operations and maintenance agreements for facilities maintained by the City, but owned or co-owned with an outside agency for less than $250,000 in the Water Grant Reimbursement Fund (Fund 6205) , the Wastewater Grant
Reimbursement Fund (Fund 6206), and the Water Revenue Bonds Ser. 2017 Fund (Fund 6211) for an agency’s share and to adjust revenue and expense budget based on actuals for project closure.

17.3. The City Manager is authorized to make the following adjustments between Department operating budgets and CIPs or MYOPs:
(A) Adjust the revenue budget for the City Attorney’s Office and the expenditure budget in the Justice for Neighbors (JFN) (I03000100) MYOP based on the actual fees, penalties, and other revenues collected from third parties for Public Nuisance, Social Nuisance, and JFN actions brought by the City Attorney.
(B) Adjust the Community Development Department operating budget for spay/neuter and unaltered pet-lic ensing revenue accounts (Account 341380 [Program Code 13006] and 351020) and increase the Animal Care Low Income Spay/Neuter Program (I13000600) MYOP expenditure 439
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

budget in the General Fund (Fund 1001) to reflect 50% of the penalty fees and 50% of unaltered pet-licensing fees collected in accordance with Sacramento City Code section 9.44.215.D.
(C) Adjust the revenue budget for the Convention and Cultural Services Department franchise fee to refl ect actual revenues received and increase the expenditure budget by a like amount in the Old Sacramento Service Courts & Support Facilities (M17700000) CIP.
(D) Adjust the Convention and Cultural Services revenue budget for Memorial Auditorium Facility Fee revenues and the Memorial Auditorium Improvements (M17101000) CIP ex penditure budget based on actual fees collected, less any operating co sts associated with delivering this service.
(E) Adjust the Convention and Cultur al Services revenue budget for SAFE Credit Union Performing Arts Cent er Facility Fee revenues and the Performing Arts Center Improv ements (M17101800) CIP expenditure budget based on the actual fees co llected, less any operating costs associated with delivering this service.
(F) Adjust the Public Works Departm ent revenue budget to reflect actual revenues received and the Sacrament o Valley Station Operations and Management (I15001000) MYOP expenditure budget by a like amount. (G) Increase the Public Works Depar tment revenue and expenditure budgets for launch-ramp activities to reflect actual revenues received and transfer any resulting year-end savings for these activities to the Harbor Dredging (M17500000) CIP if the Department has positive net year-end results. (H) Adjust the Public Works Department revenue budget and the expenditure budget in the Shared-Rideable Implementation (K15195100) CIP based on the actual revenues received from the Shared-Rideable permit fees, except for the portion of the fee assessed to offset parking-meter- revenue loss.
(I) Adjust the Public Works Depar tment revenue budget (15001021) and the expenditure budget in the Tree Planting and Replacement (R15188500) CIP based on actual revenues rece ived in the Tree Planting and Replacement Fund (Fund 2035).
(J) Adjust the Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department revenue budget for recreation-progr am fees and increase the expenditure budget in the Recreation Facility Improvement (L19800200) CIP if the full cost of the current fi scal-year operations for this CIP have been recovered and the Department has positive net year-end results. (K) Adjust appropriati ons made in the Approved Budget for fleet replacements from amounts budgeted for updated fleet-replacement costs less than $250,000 by depar tment and by fund and transfer expenditure budgets from department operating budgets to the Fleet 440
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Acquisitions (I06000999) MYOP if the department is projecting expenditure savings in excess of the transfer.
(L) Increase the transfer from the Co mmunity Center Fund (Fund 6010) to the G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) to of fset the annual budget provided for in Schedule 9 for the Powerhouse Science Center (E18000400) EFP as authorized by Council through December 2048, if Transient Occupancy Tax revenues exceed budget by an amount up to $600,000 at year-end and if the Community C enter fund has positive year-end available fund balance.
(M) Increase the Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department revenue budget for the all-weather spor t field facility fees received and increase the expenditure budget in t he Granite All Weather Field CIP (L19806000), provided that the Department has positive net year-end G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) results.
(N) Adjust the Transportation CIP budget to meet the City’s SB 1 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) requirements.
(O) Adjust Community Development Department’s revenue budget for the Housing Trust and Housing Impact adminis trative fees to reflect actual revenues received and increase the expenditure budget by a like amount in the General Plan Update (I22000000) MYOP.

17.4. The City Manager is authorized to make the following adjustments to CIPs and MYOPs:
(A) Adjust the revenue and expenditure budgets in the Old Sacramento Garbage Service Courts (M1770000 0), Old Sacramento District Improvements (M17700100), and the Joe’s Crab Shack & Rio City Café Repairs and Maintenance (B18119000) CIPs based on actual rent proceeds available after payment of all fees to the State of California and funding of annual required maintenance costs.
(B) Adjust revenue and expenditure budget s in the Energy Reinvestment Program (C13001900) CI P to reflect actual energy rebates and incentives received.

17.5. The City Manager is authorized to im plement the following fiscal transactions as needed to properly manage and account for the City’s Cannabis revenues and expenditures:
(A) Adjust the Citywide revenue budgets for all Business Operations taxes relative to Cannabis acti vities based on actual revenues received and increase the expenditure budget in the Cannabis Policy and Enforcement (I06420000) MYOP as necessary to cover costs.
(B) Adjust the revenue budget for t he City Manager’s Office of Cannabis Management operations (02001101) to reflect actual revenues received and increase or decrease the expenditure budget in the operating budget 441
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

by a like amount. At year-end excess resources must be transferred to I06420000 to offset the cost of enf orcement. If there are inadequate revenues available, resources must be transferred from I06420000 to cover the actual operating costs incurred in 02001101.
(C) Establish or increase the revenue budget(s) for fines and administrative penalties collected in accordance with Sacramento City Code section

8.132, relating to the cultivation of cannabis, in the department were collected and increase the expenditu re budget in I06420000 to support enforcement activities based on actual revenues received. (D) Adjust the revenue budget for Hous ing and Dangerous Building fines, fees, and penalties collected by the Community Development Department and the expenditure budget in I06420000 at year-end based on actual revenues received.
(E) Transfer expenditure budgets between the Cannabis Policy and Enforcement (I06420000) MYOP and the Cannabis Opportunity, Reinvestment and Equity (CORE) (I02420000) MYOP to support CORE program operations.

17.6. The City Manager is authorized to im plement the following fiscal transactions as needed to properly manage and accoun t for the City’s efforts toward reducing homelessness:
(A) Adjust revenue and expenditure budgets in the Whole Person Care (I02000900) MYOP related to intergov ernmental transfers received to support program activities through the performance period up to the amount of the annual progr am-year budget approved by the California Department of Health Care Services.

At year-end, the revenue and expendi ture budgets in I02000900 will be adjusted to match actuals.
(B) Adjust the revenue and expenditure budgets to reflect actual contributions received from external partners in the Homeless Housing Initiatives (I02000200) MYOP to support homeless-services programs. (C) Each fiscal year, unobligat ed G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in t he Office of Homeless Services (23001031) on June 30 must be transfe rred to the I02000200 if the Department has positive net year-end results.
(D) Adjust interdepartmental transfers related to the Whole Person Care (I02000900) MYOP as needed for the duration of that program. (E) Each fiscal year, unobligat ed G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in the Office of Community Outreach (23001021) on June 30 must be transferred to the Community Response MYOP (I23000100) if the Department has positive net year-end results.

442
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

(F) Each fiscal year, unobligated G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in the Office of Violence Prevention (23001041) on June 30 must be transferred to the Gang Prevention and Intervention MYOP (I02000600) if the Department has positive net year- end results.

(G) Each fiscal year, unobligat ed G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in the Office of Violence Prevention (23001041) on June 30 must be transferred to the Community Response MYOP (I23000100) if the Office has positive net year-end results.

(H) Each fiscal year, unobligat ed G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in the Office of Violence Prevention (23001041) on June 30 must be transferred to the Gang Prevention and Intervention MYOP (I020000600) if the Office has positive net year-end results.

17.7. The City Manager is authorized to implement an y necessary financial transactions for the administration of revolving loan fund programs authorized by the Council.

Section 18. Year-End Process and Carryover Authority.

18.1. Each fiscal year, all purchase-order commitments outstanding on June 30, and associated appropriations, are hereby continued.

18.2. If there is not a budgetar y surplus in the G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) at year- end, the City Manager shall suspend the G/MU Fund transfers and carryovers authorized in this section.

18.3. Each fiscal year, unobligated appropriations in ex istence on June 30 for the Council operations budget will be carried over to the next fiscal year.

18.4. Each fiscal year, unob ligated General Fund appropriations in existence in the Arts Stabilization budget (80001065) on June 30 must be transferred to the Cultural and Economic Vitality (I 17001000) MYOP if the department has positive net year-end General Fund results.

18.5. Each fiscal year, revenues in excess of budget in Building Inspection, Building Plan Check, Customer Service/Permit Counter, and Planning Operations areas of the Community Development Depar tment must be transferred to the Development Stabilization Contingency Reserve (DSCR), consistent with the adopted DSCR policy, if the Department has positive net year-end results.

If these operations do not achieve the budgeted revenues or if program costs exceed the program budget, then resource s must be transferred from the DSCR to these areas of the Community Development Department to cover the shortfall.
443
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

18.6. Each fiscal year, unob ligated General Fund appropriations in existence in the Human Resources Department on June 30 must be transferred to the Training and Outreach (I08000300) MYOP if the Department has positive net year-end General Fund results.

18.7. Each fiscal year, unobli gated net appropriations in existence on June 30 in the Information Technology (IT) Department operations General Fund budget and the citywide IT budget in Citywide and Community Support must be transferred to the IT Critical Infrastructure (A07000700) CIP to create a funding mechanism for future citywide technology initiatives, which the City Manager will review annually.

18.8. Each fiscal year, unobligated appropriati ons in the City’s California Public Employees’ Retirement System budget account(s) (413170/ 413172) that are not required to balance the budget must be transferred to the City’s other post- employment benefit trust.

18.9. Each fiscal year, if the START Fund (Fund 2501) has a deficit, unobligated G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) appropriations in existence in the Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department on June 30 must be transferred to Fund 2501 to cover any deficit asso ciated with the general- and auto-liability insurance premiums if the Department has positive net year-end General Fund results.

18.10. Each fiscal year, the Fleet Acquis itions (I06000999) MYOP will be reviewed, and excess funds will be returned to the fund of origin.

18.11. Each fiscal year, unobligated appropr iations in the fiscal year operating Measure U MYOPs at the close of the fiscal year must be returned to Measure U available fund balance (Fund 2401).

18.12 The City Manager is authorized to es tablish the Commercial Waste Compliance MYOP (I15220000) and each fiscal year, unobligated net appropriations in existence on June 30 in the Public Works Department (15005861) must be transferred to the Commercial Waste Compliance MYOP (I15220000).

18.13. Each fiscal year, any unspent Meas ure U Fund (Fund 2401) appropriations in the Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment Department on June 30 must be transferred to the Measure U Park Improvements CIP (L19706000), Citywide Pool Assess/Repair CIP (L19706500), or Recreation Facility Improvements CIP (L19800200) until the backlog of defe rred maintenance, for existing projects within the programs, are completed.

18.14 The City Manager is authorized to ma ke all necessary budgetary adjustments to account for the interfund Loan from the Risk Fund (Fund 6502) to the General Fund (Fund 1001) related to the agreem ent with the City and the Natomas Basin Conservancy Loan.

18.15 Each fiscal year, adjust transfers from the Water Fund (Fund 6005) available fund balance to the Drinking Water St ate Revolving Fund (Fund 6312) to pay 444
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

for interest expense and negative interest earnings incurred since the inception of the loan.

18.16 The City Manager is author ized to transfer up to $7.8 million in one-time funds from FY2021/22 year-end G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401) surplus for the City’s contribution towards the California St ate Library Building Forward Program Grant.

18.17 Each fiscal year, transfer up to $500,000 of available operat ing grant resources to the Public Safety Capital Improv ement Program (F11101000) for specialty vehicle and equipment purchases.

18.18 Each fiscal year, any unspent balance in the Personal City Leave Payout Account (Account 413097) will be carried over to the next fiscal year.

Section 19. Year-End Reporting.

19.1. Each fiscal year, after any adjustm ents specifically provided for in other sections of this resolution, all appropriations in the Operating Budget that remain unspent and unencumbered (unobligated) on June 30 will revert to the available fund balances of the respective funds. Any budgetary surplus in the G/MU Fund (Fund 1001/2401), determined as part of the fiscal year-end close process, will be reported in the ACFR as Assigned for Next Year’s Budget, Unassigned, or as specifically directed below or in a subsequent resolution.

19.2. All unrealized investment gains determined as part of the fiscal year-end close process will be reported in the ACFR as Assigned for Unrealized Investment Gains, as those gains are not available for appropriation.

Section 20. Miscellaneous Controls and Considerations.

20.1. Expenditures by fund at the department level must not exceed the Operating Budget as amended by any subsequent approval by the Council or the City Manager in accordance with this resolution.

20.2. Subject to the City Manager’s approval, projected fund deficiencies in any department must be corrected as follows in accordance with the sections of this resolution governing transfers and appropriations by reducing expenditures in the department (e.g., restricting purchase orders, freezing vacant positions) or by an appropriation transfer from Administrative Contingency or available fund balance, or both, subject to the provisions of section 5.

20.3. The City Manager is aut horized to eliminate funds as required for proper accounting and fiscal management when th e purpose of a fund has expired, and its fund balance has been expended.

20.4. In all staff reports t hat come before the Council, net budgetary impacts on all funds, including indirect impacts, must be stated clearly and concisely so that the Council has a full understanding of the financial consideration and impacts of its decisions.
445
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

20.5. The City Manager shall beg in using an equity lens in the review of all budgetary recommendations to Council including the annual budget, midyear budget and staff reports as soon as practical after development of a shared definition of equity in coordination with the co mmunity, development of associated outcomes and measures and Council’s creation and adoption of an Equity Resolution.

Resolution Exhibits:

Exhibit A – Budget Changes
Exhibit B – Summary of FTE
Exhibit C – Measure U Programming
Exhibit D – FY2022/23 Proposed Operating Budget
Exhibit E – 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Budget

446
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exhibit A

FY2022/23 BUDGET CHANGES

(will be added after Budget Adoption)

447
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exhibit B

FY2022/23 SUMARY OF FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT (FTE)

BY FUND AND DEPARTMENT

FY2021/22
Amended
FY2022/23
Add/Deletes
FY2022/23
Re-org
FY2022/23
Augmentation
FY2022/23
Proposed
General Fund
Mayor/Council 32.00 - - - 32.00 City Auditor 10.00 - - - 10.00 City Attorney 62.00 - - - 62.00 City Clerk 24.00 - - - 24.00 City Manager 28.00 - - - 28.00 City Treasurer 14.00 - - - 14.00 Community Development 191.00 - - 5.00 196.00 Convention and Cultural Services 5.00 - - - 5.00 Finance 92.00 - - 1.90 93.90 Fire 710.50 - - 2.00 712.50 Human Resources 43.00 - - 1.00 44.00 Information Technology 200.50 - - 1.00 201.50 Police 1,063.46 - - - 1,063.46 Public Works 429.00 - - 2.00 431.00 Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment 12.00 - - - 12.00 Citywide and Community Support 1.00 - - - 1.00 Subtotal General Funds 2,917.46 - - 12.90 2,930.36 Meas
ure U
Mayor/Council 5.00 - - - 5.00 City Manager 43.00 - - - 43.00 Community Development 117.00 - - 2.00 119.00 Community Response 40.00 - - - 40.00 Convention and Cultural Services 21.20 (1.25) - - 19.95 Fire 7.00 - - 11.00 18.00 Police 63.50 - - - 63.50 Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment 558.88 (3.69) - - 555.19 Subtotal General Funds 855.58 (4.94) - 13.00 863.64 Enterprise Funds
Community Center
Convention & Cultural Services 97.30 0.75 - - 98.05 Parking
Public Works 61.25 - - - 61.25 Solid Waste
Public Works 171.30 - - 13.00 184.30 Storm Drainage
Utilities 123.18 - 2.18 - 125.36 Wastewater
Utilities 94.36 - (0.18) - 94.18 Water
Utilities 354.36 - (2.00) 1.00 353.36 Subtotal Enterprise Funds 901.75 0.75 - 14.00 916.50 Internal Service Funds
Fleet Management
Public Works 83.00 - - - 83.00 Risk Management
Human Resources 17.00 - - - 17.00 Workers' Compensation
Human Resources 19.00 - - - 19.00 Subtotal Internal Service Funds 119.00 - - - 119.00 Other Governmental Funds
4th R Program
Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment 133.10 - - - 133.10 Innovation and Growth
City Manager 2.00 - - - 2.00 Marina
Public Works 6.60 - - - 6.60 START
Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment 16.24 - - - 16.24 City/County Office-Water Planning
Citywide and Community Support 6.00 - - - 6.00 Subtotal Other Governmental Funds 163.94 - - - 163.94 TOTAL 4,957.73 (4.19) - 39.90 4,993.44 448
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exhibit C

FY2022/23 MEASURE U PROGRAMMING

Revenues and Expenditures in ($ in 000s)
FY2022/23
FTE
FY2022/23
Proposed
FY2023/24
Projection
FY2024/25
Projection
FY2025/26
Projection
FY2026/27
Projection
REVENUES 135,769 139,735 137,856 142,649 147,135

EXPENDITURES
Affordable Housing
Operations 21.00 1,944 2,007 2,061 2,083 2,127 Multi-Year Operating Projects 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 Affordable Housing Subtotal 21.00 3,144 3,207 3,261 3,283 3,327 Arts/Creative Edge
Operations 17.95 4,115 4,187 4,253 4,297 4,408 Multi-Year Operating Projects 114 114 114 114 114 Arts/Creative Edge Subtotal 17.95 4,229 4,301 4,367 4,411 4,522 Climate A ction
Operations 2.00 331 340 348 352 360 Multi-Year Operating Projects 300 300 300 300 300 Climate Action Subtotal 2.00 631 640 648 652 660 Community Inv estme nt
Operations 184.57 19,256 19,594 19,972 21,605 21,039 Multi-Year Operating Projects 3,773 3,773 3,773 3,773 3,773 Capital Improvements 2,600 2,700 2,700 2,700 2,700 Community Investment Subtotal 184.57 25,629 26,066 26,445 28,078 27,511 Com
munity Response
Operations 123.00 14,039 14,478 14,826 14,890 15,159 Multi-Year Operating Projects 10,147 10,192 10,238 10,284 10,331 Community Response Subtotal 123.00 24,187 24,670 25,063 25,174 25,490 Homelessness
Operations 6.00 846 869 891 903 923 Multi-Year Operating Projects 2,146 2,146 2,146 2,146 2,146 Homelessness Subtotal 6.00 2,992 3,015 3,037 3,049 3,069 Inclusive Economic Development
Operations 33.00 6,833 7,494 7,642 7,736 7,870 Multi-Year Operating Projects 750 750 750 750 750 Inclusive Economic Development Subtotal 33.00 7,583 8,244 8,392 8,486 8,620 Library
Operations - 14,272 14,272 14,772 15,272 15,872 Multi-Year Operating Projects 400 400 400 400 400 Library Subtotal - 14,672 14,672 15,172 15,672 16,272 Public Safety
Community Development
Operations 14.00 1,508 1,592 1,635 1,897 1,639 Community Development Subtotal 14.00 1,508 1,592 1,635 1,897 1,639 Fire
Operations 18.00 9,903 9,939 10,128 10,305 10,497 Fire Subtotal 18.00 9,903 9,939 10,128 10,305 10,497 Police
Operations 63.50 5,730 5,881 6,021 6,112 6,239 Police Subtotal 63.50 5,730 5,881 6,021 6,112 6,239 Youth Parks & Community Enrichment (YPCE)
Operations 13.00 1,612 1,618 1,621 1,644 1,838 YPCE Subtotal 13.00 1,612 1,618 1,621 1,644 1,838 Public Safety Subtotal 108.50 18,753 19,030 19,405 19,957 20,213 Youth
Operations 367.62 23,875 24,407 24,962 25,287 26,293 Multi-Year Operating Projects 4,562 4,557 4,553 4,549 4,544 Capital Improvements - - - - - Youth Subtotal 367.62 28,437 28,964 29,515 29,835 30,837 Miscellaneous
Operations - 4,557 4,575 4,301 4,077 3,896 Multi-Year Operating Projects 225 225 225 225 225 Miscellaneous Subtotal - 4,781 4,799 4,526 4,302 4,121 Total Expenditures 863.64 135,037 137,608 139,831 142,899 144,642 Economic Uncertainty Reserve (EUR) Contribution (0.5% of Expenses) 675 688 699 714 723 Net Resources (revenues less expenditures) 57 1,439 (2,674) (964) 1,770 Other Sources/Uses
Release of FY2021/22 Midyear Reserves 1,971 10,000 - - - Homeless Services Resources (HHAP) 13,847 - - - - Homeless Funding Gap (22,120) (40,155) (41,856) (42,902) (43,974) Estimated Labor Contract Costs (832) (849) (866) (883) (901) Revised Forecast 863.64 (7,077)$ (29,566)$ (45,396)$ (44,750)$ (43,106)$ 449
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exhibit D

FY2022/23 APPROVED OPERATING BUDGET

(will be added after Budget Adoption)

450
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

Exhibit E

APPROVED 2022-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

(will be added after Budget Adoption)

451
FY2022/23 Proposed Budget

452
CityofSacramento.org

CITY OF SACRAMENTO FACTS
The City of Sacramento was founded in 1849
and is the oldest incorporated city in California.

In 1920, city voters adopted a Charter (municipal
constitution) and a City Council/City Manager form
of government.

The City is divided into eight districts.

Elected members of the City Council serve
a four-year term.

The Mayor is elected by all voters in the City. In
2002, voters approved a measure for the Mayor
to serve full-time. All other Councilmembers are
elected by district and serve part-time.

The Mayor and other Councilmembers have an
equal vote in all matters.

The City of Sacramento currently encompasses
approximately 100 square miles.

The City of Sacramento population is
estimated at 515,673.

Photo by Raoul Ortega
PROPOSED BUDGET | FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 | CITY OF SACRAMENTO

DARRELL STEINBERG
Mayor

ANGELIQUE ASHBY
Vice Mayor, District 1

SEAN LOLOEE
Councilmember, District 2

JEFF HARRIS
Councilmember, District 3

KATIE VALENZUELA
Councilmember, District 4

JAY SCHENIRER
Councilmember, District 5

ERIC GUERRA
Mayor Pro Tempore, District 6

RICK JENNINGS, II
Councilmember, District 7

MAI VANG
Councilmember, District 8

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Proposed Budget
20232022

FISCAL YEAR
453
CityofSacramento.org

CITY OF SACRAMENTO FACTS
The City of Sacramento was founded in 1849
and is the oldest incorporated city in California.

In 1920, city voters adopted a Charter (municipal
constitution) and a City Council/City Manager form
of government.

The City is divided into eight districts.

Elected members of the City Council serve
a four-year term.

The Mayor is elected by all voters in the City. In
2002, voters approved a measure for the Mayor
to serve full-time. All other Councilmembers are
elected by district and serve part-time.

The Mayor and other Councilmembers have an
equal vote in all matters.

The City of Sacramento currently encompasses
approximately 100 square miles.

The City of Sacramento population is
estimated at 515,673.

Photo by Raoul Ortega
PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM | 2022-2027 | CITY OF SACRAMENTO

DARRELL STEINBERG
Mayor

ANGELIQUE ASHBY
Vice Mayor, District 1

SEAN LOLOEE
Councilmember, District 2

JEFF HARRIS
Councilmember, District 3

KATIE VALENZUELA
Councilmember, District 4

JAY SCHENIRER
Councilmember, District 5

ERIC GUERRA
Mayor Pro Tempore, District 6

RICK JENNINGS, II
Councilmember, District 7

MAI VANG
Councilmember, District 8

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Proposed Capital
Improvement Program
20272022

PROPOSED

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2022-2027

DARRELL STEINBERG
Mayor

ANGELIQUE ASHBY JAY SCHENIRER
Vice Mayor, District 1 Councilmember, District 5

SEAN LOLOEE ERIC GUERRA
Councilmember, District 2 Mayor Pro Tempore, District 6

JEFF HARRIS RICK JENNINGS, II
Councilmember, District 3 Councilmember, District 7

KATIE VALENZUELA MAI VANG
Councilmember, District 4 Councilmember, District 8

HOWARD CHAN
City Manager

HECTOR BARRON MICHAEL JASSO
Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager

CHRISTOPHER C. CONLIN LEYNE MILSTEIN
Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager

Prepared by

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

BUDGET, POLICY, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DIVISION

EMILY COMBS MIRTHALA SANTIZO

JASON BADER ANGIE GALIEOTE ZONOUSIA LEE

LEILA MENOR ELIZABETH RAMOS MICHAEL TAMAYO

in conjunction with CIP coordinators and staff

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
i

Table of Contents Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW
Transmittal Letter ............................................................................................................. 1 Capital Budgeting Excellence Award ............................................................................... 3 Overview of the 2022-2027 CIP ....................................................................................... 4

HOW TO READ THIS DOCUMENT
Key Sections .................................................................................................................... 7 The Budget Process ........................................................................................................ 8 The CIP Review Process
................................................................................................. 8 General Plan Consistency – Section C ............................................................................ 9 Program Area Summaries – Sections D-I ...................................................................... 10 Description of Major Funding Sources – Section J ........................................................ 15 Indexes – Sections K-N ................................................................................................. 15 Resources – Section O .................................................................................................. 15 SECTION A – BUDGET SCHEDULES
Schedule 1 – Capital Budget by Fund .......................................................................... A-1 Schedule 2 – Capital Budget by Program Area ........................................................... A-2 Schedule 3 – Fund and Program Area Summaries ...................................................... A-3 Schedule 4 – Capital Improvement Program: Total Fund Summary ............................

A-4
Schedule 5 – Capital Improvement Program: Total Program Summary ...................... A-8 SECTION B – SACRAMENTO AREA MAPS
City Council Dis
tricts .................................................................................................... B-1 Community Plan Areas ................................................................................................ B-2 Shovel-Ready Areas .................................................................................................... B-3 Neighborhood Commercial Revitalization Areas .......................................................... B-4 Bikeways ...................................................................................................................... B-5 SECTION C – GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Introduction .................................................................................................................. C-1 FY2022/23 New, Site-Specific CIPs ............................................................................. C-4 SECT
IONS D-I – PROGRAM AREA SUMMARIES
SECTION D – General Government
Introduction .................................................................................................................. D-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................ D-2 Major Programs and Projects ...................................................................................... D-4 Map .............................................................................................................................. D-5 Programmatic Details ................................................................................................... D-6 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

ii
Table of Contents (continued) Page
SECTION E – Public Safety
Introduction .................................................................................................................. E-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................ E-1 Major Programs and Projects ...................................................................................... E-3 Programmatic Details ................................................................................................... E-4

SECTION F – Convention, Culture, and Leisure
Introduction .................................................................................................................. F-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................ F-1 Major Programs and Projects ...................................................................................... F-2 Map .............................................................................................................................. F-4 Programmatic Details ................................................................................................... F-5

SECTION G – Parks and Recreation
Introduction .................................................................................................................. G-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................ G-2 Major Programs and Projects ...................................................................................... G-4 Map .............................................................................................................................. G-5 Programmatic Details ................................................................................................... G-6

SECTION H – Transportation
Introduction .................................................................................................................. H-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................ H-3 Major Programs and Projects ...................................................................................... H-5 Map .............................................................................................................................. H-9 Programmatic Details ................................................................................................. H-10

SECTION I – City Utilities
Introduction ................................................................................................................... I-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................. I-2 Major Programs and Projects ....................................................................................... I-3 Map ............................................................................................................................... I-5 Programmatic Details .................................................................................................... I-6

SECTION J – DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES
Major Funding Types .................................................................................................... J-1 Major Funding Sources ................................................................................................. J-1 Debt .......................................................................................................................... .... J-1 Fund 1001 – General Fund ........................................................................................... J-2 Funds 2002 and 2036 – Gas Tax and Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Account Funds ................................................................................................................. J-3 Fund 2007 – Major Street Construction Fund ............................................................... J-4 Fund 2008 – Street Cut Fund ....................................................................................... J-5 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

iii
Table of Contents (continued) Page
SECTION J – DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES (continued) Fund 2012 – Transportation System Management Fund .............................................. J-6 Fund 2013 – Transportation Development Act Fund .................................................... J-7 Fund 2016 – Development Services Fund .................................................................... J-8 Funds 2026, 2038, and 2039 – New Measure A Construction and Maintenance Funds ................................................................................................................. J-9 Fund 2035 – Tree Planting and Replacement Fund ................................................... J-10 Fund 2232 – Landscaping and Lighting District Fund ................................................. J-11 Fund 2401 – Measure U Fund .................................................................................... J-12 Fund 2608 – Marina Fund ........................................................................................... J-13 Fund 3204 – Park Development Impact Fee Fund ..................................................... J-14 Fund 3206 – North Natomas Financing Plan Public Facilities Fee Fund .................... J-15 Fund 3215 – Transportation Development Impact Fee Fund ...................................... J-16 Fund 3338 – Florin Depot Industrial Park Fund .......................................................... J-17 Funds 3702, 3703, and 3704 – Capital Grant Funds .................................................. J-18 Fund 6001 – Water Development Fee Fund ............................................................... J-19 Fund 6004 – Parking Fund ......................................................................................... J-20 Fund 6005 – Water Fund ............................................................................................ J-21 Fund 6006 – Wastewater Fund ................................................................................... J-22 Fund 6007 – Solid Waste Fund .................................................................................. J-23 Fund 6010 – Community Center Fund ........................................................................ J-24 Fund 6011 – Storm Drainage Fund ............................................................................. J-25 Fund 6501 – Fleet Management Fund ........................................................................ J-26

SECTIONS K-N – INDEXES
Section K – Projects Receiving New Funding
by Funding Source and Project Number ................................................. K-1 Section L – Projects Receiving New Funding
by Program Area and Project Number .................................................... L-1 Section M – All Projects by Council District and Project Name ................................. M-1 Section N – All Projects by Project Number ............................................................... N-1

SECTION O – RESOURCES
Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... O-1 Glossary ....................................................................................................................... O-2 Index ............................................................................................................................ O-7 Reference Materials ..................................................................................................... O-9

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

iv
Quick Reference Guide

SUBJECT AREA DOCUMENT SECTION PAGE NUMBER OR

SECTION

GENERAL INFORMATION

Summary of the 2022-2027 Program Executive Summary 1-6
Overview of the CIP Program How to Read This
Document
7-15
Specific Program Areas Program Area Summaries D-I
Summary and History of Funding
Sources
Description of Major
Funding Sources
J
Definitions of CIP Terms Resources O
Other Documents to Reference Resources O

PROJECT INFORMATION

New Projects Program Area Summaries
(Programming Details)
D-I
(e.g., D-6 to D-20)
Indexes K-L
Continuing Projects
with Additional Funding
Program Area Summaries
(Programming Details)
D-I
(e.g., D-6 to D-20)
Indexes K-L
Continuing Projects
without Additional Funding
Indexes M-N

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS OR PROGRAMS WITH NEW FUNDING

CIPs by Funding Source Indexes K
CIPs by Program Area Indexes L

SUMMARY OF ALL PROJECTS OR PROGRAMS IN THE FIVE-YEAR CIP

CIPs by Council District Indexes M
CIPs by Project Number Indexes N

([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\DQG
2YHUYLHZ

Howard Chan
City Manager

City Hall
915 I Street, Fifth Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-2604
916-808-5704

April 25, 2022

Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sacramento, California

Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

The Proposed 2022-2027 Capi tal Improvement Program (CIP) is the City’s five-year financial and strategic plan for infrastructure and facilit y needs. The five-year CIP totals $420.5 million, including $70.9 million in General/Measur e U (G/MU) Funds, and has been prepared in consideration of the City’s ongoing emergence from the coronavirus pandemic. The fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 CIP budget totals $120.8 million, including $18.1 million in G/MU Funds.

The CIP reflects Council adopted policies and plans and incorporates priorities identified in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Parks and Re creation Programming Guide, transportation plans (Vision Zero Action Plan, Bikeway Master Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan), utility master plans, and deferred maintenance assessments (aquatics, facilities, and park maintenance).

With the City continuing to face financial challenges caused in part by the pandemic, the ability to provide General Fund support to fund identified capital needs in our facilities and park infrastructure remains limited, requiring prioritization of competing capital needs. However, given the need for significant ongoing invest ment in the City’s capital assets, we continue to look for opportunities to augment the CIP. While capital projects are identified beyond the current ability to fund them, options are provided when one-time funding sources become available.

The pandemic has impacted certain revenue sources such as transient occupancy taxes and parking fees. Though these revenues have recovered from pandemic lows faster than anticipated, they remain below pre-pandemic levels. Nevertheless, funding for projects that rely on these revenues has increased compared to t he FY2021/22 CIP, reflecting modest recovery from the pandemic. Staff will continue to monitor these revenues and recommend program adjustments for Council consideration should revenue estimates change significantly.

Although impacted revenues are experiencing some recovery, this past year demonstrated how pandemic-induced global supply chain issues can disrupt City projects and programs. These issues have negatively affected capital progra mming nationwide, as jurisdictions have been 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
2 forced to plan their capital investments around potential materials shortages, cost impacts, and work delays. The City is working hard to minimi ze the impact of these supply chain issues and remains committed to protecting, preserving, and enhancing the quality of life for present and future generations.

In my sixth year as City Manager, I offer a CIP that maintains the direction expressed by Council and prioritizes investing in infrastructure that will increase operational efficiencies and benefit our community. I would like to thank Council for your leadership and support during this ongoing health crisis, which continues to impact our Ci ty, state, and country. The Council’s leadership and dedication continues to help guide us through t hese difficult times and fuel our collective efforts to ensure a thriving future for our City.

Respectfully submitted,

HOWARD CHAN
City Manager

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
3 CAPITAL BUDGETING EXCELLENCE AWARD

The City received the Capital Budget Excellence Award from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) for the 2021-2026 CIP. The award process includes peer reviews of cities’ capital programming. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.

In preparing the 2022-2027 CIP document, the CSMFO award criteria were followed and it has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This document will be submitted to the CSMFO for consideration for the FY2022/23 Capital Budgeting Excellence Award.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
4 OVERVIEW OF THE 2022-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)

The CIP is a comprehensive five-year plan that identifies current and future fiscal requirements and is the basis for determining annual capital budget expenditures. Capital improvements are major projects or programs including the procurement, construction, or installation of facilities or related equipment intended to im prove, preserve, enhance, or m odernize the City’s delivery of municipal services. A capital project has a useful lif e of at least five years and a total cost of at least $20,000.

The major goals of the CIP are the adherence to federal, state, and local mandates/laws and to strategically leverage resources to maintain or improve the City’s assets. The five-year plan includes 134 CIPs with estimated total funding of $420.5 million from all funding sources, of which $70.9 million is from the G/MU Fund. The FY2022/23 CI P budget totals $120.8 million funding 123 projects or programs, of which $18.1 million is from the G/MU Fund.

In response to fiscal challenges resulting from the ongoing pandemic , the CIP focuses on continuing funding recommendations included in the 2021-2026 CIP. The following summarizes major program areas with projec t funding included in the 2022-20 27 CIP. Detailed information on CIPs proposed to be funded within the five-year plan is included in the project detail sheets in each program area.

General Government – Section D
The five-year General Government Program continues to reflect the City’s commitment to focus limited resources toward existing facilit ies and programs including the City Facility Reinvestment Program (C13900000, $10.9 m illion) and the Facility Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance Program (C13000400, $3.0 million).

The FY2022/23 budget for the General Government Program includes $3.8 million for 15 projects or programs. The five-year plan totals $26.0 million for the same number of projects or programs.

Public Safety – Section E
The Public Safety Program reflects the City’s efforts to provide/replace body worn cameras, police safety equipment, ambulances, fire vehicles, fire safety equipment, and generators for public safety facilities. The five-year plan includes funding for the Fire Apparatus Program (F12000300, $16.8 million), the Body Worn Camera and Conductive Electrical Device Program (F11100500, $9.5 milli on), the Advanced Life S upport Equipment Program (F12000200, $7.5 million), the Fire Safety Equipment Program (F12000500, $5.3 million), the Police Safety Equipment Program (F11100800, $4.4 million), and the Police Department IT Critical Infrastructure Program (F11100600, $3.0 million).

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
5 The FY2022/23 budget for the Public Safety Progr am totals $15.8 million for eight projects or programs. The five-year pl an totals $52.3 million for the sa me number of projects or programs.

Convention, Culture, and Leisure – Section F
The Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program promotes and preserve s the City’s unique cultural heritage by delivering accessible arts, leisure, and educational experiences to enrich people's lives and enhance the me tropolitan area. The Conventi on, Culture, and Leisure Program is designed to enrich the quality of life and to contribut e to a vibrant metropolitan region by providing exceptional cultural, artistic, and leisure opportunities.

Major projects and programs receiving funding in the five-year plan include the Performing Arts Center Improvements Pr ogram (M17101800, $3.9 million), the Convention Center Production Equipment Upgrades Program (M17101700; $1.5 million), the Memorial Auditorium Improvements Program (M17101000, $1.3 million); and the Community Center Improvements Program (M17100000, $950,000).

The FY2022/23 Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program totals $2.7 million for six projects or programs. The five-year plan totals $8.2 million for nine projects or programs .

Parks and Recreation – Section G
The Parks and Recreation Program provides re sidents with significant personal, social, environmental, and economic benefits. Developing new parks and facilities and rehabilitating existing parks and facilities, with a focus on park safety and sustainability, is a high priority for the City.

One of the major projects receiving funding is the Blackbird Park Phase 2 (L19109210, $1.2 million). This project will utilize Park Impact Fee revenues to construct two futsal courts and complete fencing around the baseball field at Blackbird Park.

In FY2022/23, a total of $2.9 million will be programmed to 15 new and/or ongoing projects or programs. The five-year plan totals $3.9 m illion for the same number of projects or programs.

Transportation – Section H
The Transportation Program budgets available lo cal transportation funds to specific programs and where possible, to leverage state and federal fund s for larger transportation improvements. The largest program addresse s corridor improvement needs using road maintenance and repair funding received with the implementati on of the 2017 Road Rehabilitation and Account ability Act, also known as Senat e Bill 1 (SB 1). With limited resources, the Transportation Program focuses on key objectives for maintenance, safety, active transportation, equity, and mobility of the overall transportation network.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
6 The Transportation Program is divided into seven subprogram s: Active Transportation (pedestrian, bikeway, lighting, and streetscape improvement s); Bridges (maintenance and improvements); Maintenance (overlays and seal s); Major Transportation Improvements (major roadway construction); Parking (parki ng facility maintenance and upgrades); Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility (curb ramps, mark ers, and other accessibility improvements); and Traffic Operations and Safety (safety improvements, Traffi c Operations Center, traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and major street light replacement).

Major projects and programs receiving fundi ng in the five-year plan include: the Transportation Corridor Program (R15200000, $57. 5 million); the Active Transportation Program (T15180400, $13.2 million); the Del Rio Trail (K15165100, $11.4 million); the Broadway Complete Streets Project (T15175300, $10.9 million); and the Vision Zero Safety Program (S15184100, $10.7 million).

In FY2022/23, a total of $63.6 million, including $37.2 million in State and Federal grants, will be programmed in 47 projects or programs. The five-year plan totals $171.2 million, including $59.6 million in State and Federal grants, for 50 projects or programs.

City Utilities – Section I
The City Utilities Capital Impr ovement Program (Program) has four major funding sources and subprogram areas: Recycling and Solid Waste, Storm Drainage, Wastewater, and Water Funds. It is devoted to regulatory complianc e, the improvement, rehabilitation, and replacement of the utility infrastructure, im provement or development-related projects, and ongoing facility-related issues. Major programs receiving funding in the five-year plan include the Water+ Program (Z14190100, $30.8 milli on), the Well Rehabilitation Program (Z14110100, $28.1 million), the Combined Co llection System Rehabilitation and Replacement Program (X14170100, $3.2 million), and the 28th Street Landfill Regulatory Compliance Upgrades Program (Y15000100, $4.5 million).

Storm drainage rates have not been increased sinc e 1996, prior to the implementation of Proposition 218. For this reason, revenues hav e not kept pace with storm drainage system costs, and currently the fund can only support critical repair projects that can no longer be deferred. Unlike the water and wastewater utilities, rate adjus tments for the storm drainage utility are subject to a citizen vote. A ballot election for a new Storm Drainage System Fee is pending as of March 2022, and progr am adjustments will be made accordingly if the fee is approved.

The FY2022/23 budget for the City Utilities Program tota ls $32.0 million for 32 projects or programs. The five-year plan totals $158.9 million for 37 projects or programs. +RZWR5HDG7KLV'RFXPHQW
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
7 KEY SECTIONS
The CIP contains the following key sections.

Section A
Budget Schedules – summarize capital funding by the one-year budget (FY2022/23) and the five-year plan by funding source and by program area.

Section B
Sacramento Area Maps – identifies the city limits with Council District, Community Plan Area, Shovel-Ready Area, Neighborhood Commercial Revitalization Area, and Bikeway maps.

Section C
General Plan Consistency – summarizes planning policies, major development projects, and planned public improvements in the 2022-2027 CIP.

Sections D–I
Program Area Summaries – groups individual ca pital projects by major program area and includes goals and project selection criter ia, project budgets, how they will be funded, program issues (including in some cases unmet needs), program long-range plans, and detail sheets for those proj ects that include budgeted res ources through FY2021/22 and a budget plan for FY2022/23 through FY2026/27. Additional section-specific information may be found on page 12.

Section J
Description of Major Funding Sources – pr ovides the following information on funding sources: (a) restrictions on t he use of the funds; (b) legislat ion governing the use of these funds; (c) five-year historical CIP programming; and (d) a summary of how those funds have been expended.

Sections K–N
Indexes – provide funding information for the FY2022/23 CIP by Funding Source (Index K), by Program Area (Index L), and for all active and new proj ects included in the 2022-2027 CIP by City Council District (Index M) and by Project Number (Index N).

Section O
Resources – contains definitio ns of commonly used terms or concepts and links to various planning documents used to rate and create this CIP.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
8 THE BUDGET PROCESS
The Mayor and Council continued efforts to engage and educate the community on the budget process and the City’s financia l challenges over the long-term by completing a community budget survey and facilitating discussions at the Budget and Audit Committee (Committee) and Council meetings in January and February. T he following graphic re presents the City’s budget/program planning cycle:

The City’s fiscal year is July 1 through June 30. As such, the Council adopts the City's operating and capital budgets for a single fiscal year beginning July 1 and ending June 30 in the subsequent calendar year.

THE CIP REVIEW PROCESS
Each project proposal is scrutinized through a vari ety of approaches before it is included in the CIP. CIPs included in the five-year program are identified by department staff based upon: 1) input from the community received at neighborhood meetings during the year; 2) input from the City Council on needs that develop or are identified during the year; 3) City Council approved master plans and guides for growth, improvements, and rehabilitation for s pecific programs; 4) adopted criteria for selecti ng projects to meet the City Council ’s goals; and 5) staff-identified projects based on critical need due to safety iss ues or to comply with new mandates. Specific

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
9 documents used in the capital planning process, such as the Sacramento 2035 General Plan or the Transportation Programming Guide, are referenced in Section O (Resources) of this book.

All projects are reviewed first by the responsible operating departments. Utilizing the resources available, e.g., City Facility Condition Assessment , CIPs are scored, ranked, prioritized, and presented for funding based upon the level of funding estimated to be available for the coming fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years. Generally, projects are prioritized as follows: 1) they are mandated by law or Council policy; 2) they are crucial for public/staff safety or health; 3) funding is or has become available for them; 4) th ey represent an advantageous opportunity with a restricted timeframe; 5) they in crease efficiency or effectiveness of City services; or 6) they enrich or expand City services or assets by main taining or keeping facilities competitive, safe, and contributory towards increasing revenues.

Top priority has been given to those projects that have a positive effect on operations. In most cases, there is no negative operating impact because the project generates future cost savings or is offset by revenue. For details about ranking and scoring criteria, please refer to the program area’s programming guide referred to in the Gl ossary and Resources section. Departments submit the proposed projects to the Budget, Policy & Strategic Planning Division of the Finance Department. The Division then reviews and creates maps of the proposed projects or programs through geographic information system s (GIS) and prepares the CIP for submittal to the City Council no later than 60 days prior to the start of the new fiscal year.

The proposed CIP is presented, discussed, and acted upon by the City Council in public session during the budget hearings. Members of the community may comment on the proposed CIP and provide input to the City Council during the hearing process. The City Council can make changes to the proposed CIP and then may act on final project approval for inclusion in the approved CIP and Operating Budgets.

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY – SECTION C
All projects are reviewed by the Community Development Department’s Planning Division staff and the Planning and Design Commission for consist ency with the City’s General and Specific Plan policies (City Code Chapter 17.912.010). In general, capita l programming is proposed in accordance with existing approved master plans and planning guides, and then is evaluated and ranked based upon priorities identified in those plans and guides.

Priorities may be ranked on items such as:

 Adherence to state and/or federal law
 Adopted City Council policies
 Availability of funding
 Public health and safety
 The 2035 General Plan
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
10  Public input
 Support of economic development
 Support of infill development
 Project feasibility

PROGRAM AREA SUMMARIES – SECTIONS D-I
This document includes program area summaries and detailed project pages for projects being funded within those program areas during the five-year plan. The summaries include program goals and criteria used to select projects to m eet those goals (project selection criteria); a summary of planned spending; a five-year plan; a summary of projects by fund; and maps detailing each site-specific project location for FY2022/23 funded projects.

Six program areas are presented wit hin the CIP. Each program area includes subsections that are divided alphabetically, and in turn these subsections include several different projects. Each project is assigned a letter and eight-digit code when it is approved for funding. The first digit of this code reflects the alphabetical letter assi gned to the subsection in which the project is included. Individual projects are detailed in their respective program areas.

Program Area – Section of CIP

General Government – Section D Transportation – Section H A – Technology K – Bikeway
B – New Buildings
C – Facility Improvements
R – Street Maintenance
S – Signals/Lighting/Traffic Control
D – General Government T – Street Improvements
V – Parking
Public Safety – Section E
F – Public Safety City Utilities – Section I
W – Storm Drainage
Convention, Culture, and Leisure – Section F X – Wastewater M – Convention Center Complex, Cultural Arts, Y – Solid Waste Golf, Marina, and Zoo Z – Water

Parks and Recreation – Section G
L – Parks and Recreation

The discussion of an individual capital program area generally begins with summary information on total program expenditures and the major projects that ma ke up the bulk of those expenditures, the planning documents referenced when identifying projects, the funding sources to support the projects, and issue statements that high light significant unresolved fiscal and 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
11 program policy issues. Each project funded in the five-year plan is summarized within a project detail page.

Detail Pages
The purpose of the detail page is to provide the City Council with enough information to approve the projects or ongoing programs.

An example of a detail page is presented on the following pages to describe the information available.

 Project Number ① and Name ②: The project or program alpha/numeric identifier and its corresponding name. Both woul d be referenced when putting the project to bid or with any City Council action. The numbering sequence reflects the alphabetical letter assigned (as described on the prior page) and an eight-digit unique numeric identifier. The leading digits reflect the responsible department (refer to the following chart), followed by unique identifiers assigned by the responsible department and generally ending in “00.”

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
12 Responsible Department

o In this example, “K” refers to a bikeway project, and “15” signifies that the department responsible for the project is the Public Works Department. The next four digits are unique and assigned by t he department. The last two digits, “00,” signal that this is a par ent project. A parent proj ect has budget appropriation authority and will be identified in bold in all the indexes.

o The CIP name may be classified into two categories: project or program.  CIP projects are typically site-specific and have a defined budget and completion date.
 CIP programs are used for ongoing fundi ng for similar improvements that will be constructed at multiple locations based on the availability of annual funding at locations identified through master plans, planning guides, and replacement programs (e.g., the Gr oundwater Protection Program, Fire Apparatus Program, and Bikeway Program). CIP programs usually contain “Program” in the title, are generally not site specific, and do not typically have a defined completion date.

 ③ Project Description: A brief but specific scope of the project. The scope of an existing CIP description may include only the preliminar y aspects of a project such as master planning or environmental revi ew. In such projects, addi tional funding and a new CIP approved by the City Council are required to fully develop the project. Other projects may include the development of Phase I of a new facility or of the entire project. The level of funding and the project scope description in the CIP determine the parameters of the project at that point in time.

 ④ Project Objectives: The purpose or scope of the project.

Leading
Digits Department Name Leading
Digits Department Name
01 Mayor/Council 11 Police
015 City Auditor 12 Fire
02 or 18 City Manager 13 or 15 Public Works
03 City Attorney 14 Utilities
04 City Clerk 17 Convention and Cultural Services
05 City Treasurer 19 Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment 06 Finance 21 Community Development
07 Information Technology 23 Community Response
08 Human Resources
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
13  ⑤ Existing Situation: The circumstances that result in the need for the project, including any pertinent history.

 ⑥ Operating Budget Impact: The estimat ed annual operating impact of the completed project. Operating and maintenance costs or savings that are significant and quantifiable are identified. Due to limited resources, most CIPs are for the repair and/or replacement of existing assets and thereby do not result in significant or quantifiable operating budget impacts. If the impact can be absorbed by the existing operating budget or if it is a repair or rehabilitation project, “none” is the response. If the impact is quantifiable, it is noted on the detail sheet, e.g., “Operating costs related to generator maintenance are estimated to be $800 per year, per generator.”

 ⑦ Project Costs: For each funding source, the amount of current budget, the unobligated budget as of February 2022, and the funding request for each year of the five-year program. The CIP is a five-year plan with a one-year budget. As such, dollars shown are based on the current value of the dollar and adjusted annually. A project must have an identified source (or sources) of funding to be included in the CIP. Many funding sources have restrictions as to how they may be us ed, as described in the Description of Major Funding Sources section.

o Note: The following reimbursable funds are included within the CIP for planning purposes, but budgets are not appropriated in the fiscal year until all grant and/or award documents have been signed. These include grant funds (Funds 3702, 3703, and 3704) and City utility grant/reimbursable funds (Funds 6205, 6206, 6207, and 6211).

 ⑧ Funding Years: The five-year CIP includes a fiscal year budget (in this example it is FY2022/23) and four fiscal y ears of planned programmi ng (2023/24, 2024/25, 2025/26, and 2026/27).

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
14  ⑨ Funding Summary: The CIP plan presents th e City's blueprint for funding critical capital projects based on resource availability and Council's capital investment priorities using current year costs. The five-year funding plan identifies total estimated project cost, funding for the following fiscal year, and a cumulative total of prior expenditures. Funding for future years is based on the current year’s estimated availability of resources. Only the projects included in the first year of th is plan (e.g., the Capital Budget) are legal appropriations. The second through the fifth years represent the City’s best estimate of a reasonably fundable plan for capital improvements subject to the availability of resources using current year costs.

 ⑩ Timelines: Capital projects will includ e a Project Start Date and an Estimated Completion Date; however, capital programs will not include a timeline for completion as they are ongoing in nature. Timelines, in li ght gray, will include a dark gray bar as the Elapsed Time passes or Percentage Complete increases. New capital projects approved for the start of a new fiscal year will reflect 0% completion, but the elapsed time will reflect the current elapsed time of the project at the time the budget is printed.

 ⑪ Council District: The number of the City Council district in which the project is located.

 ⑫ Plan Area: The number(s) of the Community Plan Area(s) in which the project is located (e.g., South Natomas, Pocket, Central City, South Area). Plan areas are defined in the 2035 General Plan. A map of these plan areas is included in the Sacramento Area Maps Section of this document.

 ⑬ Project Location: Street address, intersection, building name, or another identifier.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
15  ⑭ Project Manager: The name of the department and/or the individual project manager responsible for delivering the capital project.

The City Charter requires that the City Council adopt a budget for operations and capital improvements on or before June 30 each year. In adopting a five-year capital plan, the City is allowing for prudent and longer-term planning and allo cation of resources for its facility and infrastructure needs.

DESCRIPTION OF MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES – SECTION J
A summary of the 2022-2027 CIP resources by funding source. This section gives a brief history of each major fund, the restrictions to its use, examples of where the funds have been previously allocated, and a five-year synopsis of prior funding.

INDEXES – SECTIONS K-N
Programs or projects receivi ng new funding for FY2022/23 or proposed for future fiscal years are listed in Index K by funding source. Index L provides a si milar list, organized by program area. In addition to projects or programs receiving funding identified in the 2022-2027 CIP, there are many continuing programs or projects that have remaining budget authority. These are listed in Index M by City Council district and Index N by project number. Parent CIPs will be listed (in bold) as well as any child or subproject (in italics) established under the scope of the parent CIP.

RESOURCES – SECTION O
Included in this section is a list of frequently used acronyms, a glossary, an index, and additional resources that were used as references in the development of the Program Area sections.

6(&7,21±$
%XGJHW6FKHGXOHV
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

A - 1
Schedule 1
Capital Budget by Fund

FY2022/23 Capital Improvement Program
$120.8 Million

2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program
$420.5 Million

General/Measure U
$18.1
Grants
$37.3
Landscaping and
Lighting
$0.7
Other
$5.1 Park Development
$2.7
Transportation
$25.1
Utilities
$32.0
General/Measure U
$70.9
Grants
$59.7
Landscaping and
Lighting
$3.3
Other
$17.6 Park Development
$2.7 Transportation
$107.5
Utilities
$158.9
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

A - 2
Schedule 2
Capital Budget by Program Area

FY2022/23 Capital Improvement Program
$120.8 Million

2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program
$420.5 Million

Note: The total reflected for each program area includes all funding sources for those projects.

General
Government/
Public Safety
$19.6
Convention, Culture,
and Leisure
$2.7
Parks and
Recreation
$2.9
Transportation
$63.6
City Utilities
$32.0
General
Government/
Public Safety
$78.3
Convention, Culture,
and Leisure
$8.2
Parks and
Recreation
$3.9
Transportation
$171.2
City Utilities
$158.9
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

A - 3
Program Areas ** FY2022/23 2022-2027
General Government/
Public Safety
Computers/Communications 910,070 11,012,350
Fire 11,572,100 29,572,100
Mechanical/Electrical 50,000 250,000
Police 4,075,500 21,994,000
Repair/Remodeling 3,020,000 15,500,000
Subtotal 19,627,670 78,328,450
Convention, Culture,
and Leisure
Community Center 2,610,000 7,865,000
Marina 100,000 340,000
Subtotal 2,710,000 8,205,000
Parks and Recreation
Cultural/Arts 50,000 50,000
Parks and Recreation 2,865,000 3,825,000
Subtotal 2,915,000 3,875,000
Transportation
Bikeways 14,752,000 16,562,000
Parking 754,771 3,614,771
Signals/Lighting/
Traffic Control 16,223,196 39,096,420
Street Improvements 17,047,382 47,313,786
Street Maintenance 14,810,732 64,597,660
Subtotal 63,588,081 171,184,637
City Utilities
Solid Waste 848,000 5,690,000
Storm Drainage 250,000 1,250,000
Wastewater 1,983,000 10,003,000
Water 28,911,000 141,986,000
Subtotal 31,992,000 158,929,000
Total $120,832,751 $420,522,087
Schedule 3 - Fund and Program Area Summaries

*Index K provides further details by fund number.

**Index L provides further details by program area.

Note: Totals provided in Schedule 1 and 2 may differ
from Schedule 3 due to the use of shared funding
sources and rounding.

Fund Types
Number * FY2022/23 2022-2027
General/
Measure U
1001 15,480,120 57,456,700
2401 2,600,000 13,400,000
Subtotal 18,080,120 70,856,700
Grants
3702 21,000 105,000
3703 31,649,390 53,986,266
3704 5,581,000 5,581,000
Subtotal 37,251,390 59,672,266
Landscaping &
Lighting
2232 665,000 3,325,000
Subtotal 665,000 3,325,000
Other
2016 1,551,000 7,489,000
2020 0 0
2608 100,000 340,000
3206 11,500 57,500
3338 564,000 564,000
6010 2,660,000 8,115,000
6501 202,055 1,010,275
Subtotal 5,088,555 17,575,775
Park Development
3204 2,675,000 2,675,000
Subtotal 2,675,000 2,675,000
Transportation
2002 5,095,560 11,777,800
2007 1,400,000 7,000,000
2008 25,125 125,625
2012 14,000 14,000
2013 400,000 2,000,000
2026 385,000 1,925,000
2035 120,000 600,000
2036 11,166,047 55,830,235
2038 1,929,806 9,649,030
2039 2,736,882 13,684,410
3215 1,000,000 1,000,000
6004 804,771 3,864,771
Subtotal 25,077,191 107,470,871
Utilities
6001 3,000,000 11,900,000
6005 25,741,825 126,166,125
6006 2,155,670 12,256,750
6007 848,000 7,007,600
6011 250,000 1,616,000
Subtotal 31,995,495 158,946,475
Total $120,832,751 $420,522,087
Funding Source 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program
Total Five-year
Funding

TOTAL FUND SUMMARY
Schedule 4
Budget through
2/2022
1001 GENERAL FUND $15,480,120 $10,140,020 $10,595,520 $10,620,520 $10,620,520$165,202,914 $57,456,700 1003 ARPA REINVESTMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$8,707,875 $0
2001 MEASURE A - CONSTR. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$2,126,031 $0
2002 GAS TAX $5,095,560 $1,670,560 $1,670,560 $1,670,560 $1,670,560$16,030,108 $11,777,800 2007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000$24,924,464 $7,000,000 2008 STREET CUT $25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125$183,791 $125,625 2012 TRANSPORT. SYS. MGT. $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$365,626 $14,000 2013 TRANSPORTATION DEV. $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000$2,061,226 $2,000,000 2016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES $1,551,000 $1,516,000 $1,482,000 $1,449,000 $1,491,000$17,720,490 $7,489,000 2019 CITATION I-5 IMPROV. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$404,000 $0
2020 S. NATOMAS (SN) CIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$2,749,684 $0
2021 S. NATOMAS FBA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$220,000 $0
2023 MEASURE A - PROJECT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$13,469,780 $0
2025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$3,909,312 $0
2026 NEW MEASURE A MAINT $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 $385,000 $385,000$2,999,665 $1,925,000 2028 PROP 1B - LOCAL ST & RD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$20,840 $0
2031 INNOVATION AND GROWTH $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$665,330 $0
2032 FAIR SHARE CONTRIB. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$309,474 $0
2035 TREE PLANTING &

REPLACEMENT
$120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000$767,110 $600,000 2036 ROAD MAINT &

REHABILITATION
$11,166,047 $11,166,047 $11,166,047 $11,166,047 $11,166,047$21,517,842 $55,830,235 2038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL &
SAFETY
$1,929,806 $1,929,806 $1,929,806 $1,929,806 $1,929,806$6,236,737 $9,649,030 2039 NMA SAFETY,

STREETSCAPE, PED, BIC
$2,736,882 $2,736,882 $2,736,882 $2,736,882 $2,736,882$8,918,214 $13,684,410 2220 SUNSET MEADOWS AD
MAINT
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,600,000 $0
2230 NN LANDSCAPE CFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$122,778 $0
2232 LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING $665,000 $665,000 $665,000 $665,000 $665,000$7,121,957 $3,325,000 2235 FLORIN RD STORM & SAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$90,308 $0
2401 MEASURE U $2,600,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000$46,465,658 $13,400,000 2502 SPECIAL PRGM

DONATIONS
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$91,180 $0
2504 SPECIAL RECREATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$842,398 $0
A - 4
Funding Source 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program
Total Five-year
Funding

TOTAL FUND SUMMARY
Schedule 4
Budget through
2/2022
2507 LAND PARK TRUST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,000 $0
2508 QUIMBY ACT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$7,589,113 $0
2601 OLD SAC MARKET $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$30,000 $0
2603 GOLF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$92,640 $0
2605 ZOO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,343 $0
2607 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
(APP)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0
2608 MARINA $100,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000$1,043,368 $340,000 2609 M. FRIEDMAN ESC APP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,000,000 $0
2700 BLOCK GRANT/SHRA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$4,846,184 $0
2701 DISASTER RELIEF ACT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$3,067 $0
2702 OPERATING GRANTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $0
2703 EXTERNAL FUND PRGRMS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$329,302 $0
2801 CAL EPA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$809,400 $0
3001 1993 SERIES B COP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$600,000 $0
3002 2002 CIRB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,575 $0
3003 2003 CIRB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$21,748,994 $0
3004 2006 CIRB TAX-EXEMPT
(TE)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$3,676,797 $0
3005 2006 CIRB - TAXABLE (TX) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$361,000 $0 3006 2006 CAPITAL BONDS (TE) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$114,576 $0
3008 WILLOWCREEK FEE DIST. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$787,855 $0
3201 NN CIF $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$171,494 $0
3202 RICHARDS/RAILYARDS/

DOWNTOWN
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$359,000 $0
3204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE $2,675,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$31,928,783 $2,675,000 3206 NN FINANCE PLAN (NNFP)

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
$11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500$107,141 $57,500 3210 DOWNTOWN IMPACT FEE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$907,000 $0
3215 TRANSP DEV IMPACT FEE $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$4,743,000 $1,000,000 3311 N LAGUNA CREEK PARK
COMMUNITY FEE DIST.
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$76,543 $0
3314 NN DRAINAGE CFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$417,588 $0
3323 CFD 97-01 SERIES C $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$67,580 $0
A - 5
Funding Source 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program
Total Five-year
Funding

TOTAL FUND SUMMARY
Schedule 4
Budget through
2/2022
3328 NN DRAIN. 05 CFD 97-01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$551,121 $0
3333 CFD 97-01 CONSTRUCTION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$246,635 $0
3338 FLORIN DEPOT IND. PARK $564,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$0 $564,000 3701 TAX INCREMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$3,852,783 $0
3702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000$20,372,376 $105,000 3703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS $31,649,390 $5,382,000 $16,954,876 $0 $0$57,444,193 $53,986,266 3704 OTHER CAPITAL GRANTS $5,581,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$17,989,193 $5,581,000 3801 2003 ALKALI FLAT TE TABS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$386,255 $0 3802 2006 ARMY DEPOT TX $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,479,176 $0
3803 2006 ARMY DEPOT TE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$714,973 $0
3810 2002 ML DOWNTOWN TE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$5,230 $0
3811 2005 TAB DOWNTOWN

CAPITAL TE
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$27,273 $0
3812 2005 TAB DOWNTOWN

CAPITAL TX
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$74,497 $0
3818 2006 RIVER DISTRICT TX
BONDS
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$600,000 $0
6001 WATER IMPACT FEE $3,000,000 $1,500,000 $5,400,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000$34,654,192 $11,900,000 6004 PARKING $804,771 $765,000 $765,000 $765,000 $765,000$37,878,982 $3,864,771 6005 WATER $25,741,825 $25,579,825 $18,002,825 $28,000,825 $28,840,825$105,981,746 $126,166,125 6006 WASTEWATER $2,155,670 $2,818,070 $2,427,670 $2,427,670 $2,427,670$14,077,583 $12,256,750 6007 SOLID WASTE $848,000 $2,715,600 $1,148,000 $1,148,000 $1,148,000$34,247,184 $7,007,600 6008 LANDFILL CLOSURE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$5,195,273 $0
6009 MARINA (ENTERPRISE) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$874,075 $0
6010 COMMUNITY CENTER $2,660,000 $1,380,000 $1,375,000 $1,325,000 $1,375,000$17,408,679 $8,115,000 6011 STORM DRAINAGE $250,000 $616,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000$19,599,801 $1,616,000 6012 4TH R PROGRAM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$652,524 $0
6205 WATER GRANT

REIMBURSEMENT (RMB)
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$5,253,836 $0
6206 WASTEWATER GRANT RMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$1,000,000 $0
6207 SOLID WASTE GRANT RMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$720,500 $0
6211 SD GRANT RMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$20,238 $0
6310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$8,834,162 $0
6311 WATER REV. BONDS 2017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$607,100 $0
A - 6
Funding Source 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program
Total Five-year
Funding

TOTAL FUND SUMMARY
Schedule 4
Budget through
2/2022
6312 DRINKING WATER SRF
LOAN
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0$54,443,323 $0
6320 WASTEWATER RB 2013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$482,453 $0
6321 WASTEWATER RB 2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$6,981,141 $0
6330 2018 TOT REV BONDS (TE) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$293,630,756 $0 6331 2018 TOT REV BONDS (TA) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$19,859,558 $0 6332 2019 STID REV BONDS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$53,000,000 $0
6501 FLEET MANAGEMENT $202,055 $202,055 $202,055 $202,055 $202,055$8,664,102 $1,010,275 6502 RISK MANAGEMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$10,000 $0
$120,832,751 $75,905,490 $81,893,866 $70,478,990 $71,410,990$1,265,532,049Total All Funds: $420,522,087 A - 7
Program Area
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program

TOTAL PROGRAM AREA SUMMARY
Schedule 5
2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27
Total Five-year
Funding
Budget through
2/2022
BIKEWAYS $14,752,000 $60,000 $1,630,000 $60,000 $60,000$16,032,461 $16,562,000 COMMUNITY CENTER $2,610,000 $1,330,000 $1,325,000 $1,275,000 $1,325,000$401,969,396 $7,865,000 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$8,921,875 $0
COMPUTERS / COMMUNICATIONS $910,070 $2,557,070 $2,523,070 $2,490,070 $2,532,070$69,458,179 $11,012,350 CULTURAL / ARTS $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0$5,185,172 $50,000
DRAINAGE $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000$18,165,802 $1,250,000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0$6,259,817 $0
FIRE $11,572,100 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000$60,832,243 $29,572,100 MARINA $100,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000$3,101,498 $340,000 MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000$6,697,802 $250,000 NEW BUILDINGS $0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$27,370,676 $0
PARKING $754,771 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000$37,286,671 $3,614,771 PARKS & RECREATION $2,865,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000$83,447,043 $3,825,000 POLICE $4,075,500 $4,125,500 $4,581,000 $4,606,000 $4,606,000$16,014,886 $21,994,000 REPAIR / REMODELING $3,020,000 $3,120,000 $3,120,000 $3,120,000 $3,120,000$36,704,981 $15,500,000

SIGNALS / LIGHTING / TRAFFIC

CONTROL
$16,223,196 $3,914,806 $11,128,80 6 $3,914,806 $3,914,806$43,592,849 $39,096,420 SOLID WASTE $848,000 $1,398,000 $1,148,000 $1,148,000 $1,148,000$41,278,263 $5,690,000 STREET IMPROVEMENTS $17,047,382 $9,560,382 $12,349,258 $4,178,382 $4,178,382$125,106,623 $47,313,786 STREET MAINTENANCE $14,810,732 $12,446,732 $12,446,732 $12,446,732 $12,446,732$26,777,789 $64,597,660 WASTEWATER $1,983,000 $2,005,000 $2,005,000 $2,005,000 $2,005,000$19,327,445 $10,003,000 WATER $28,911,000 $29,573,000 $23,822,000 $29,420,000 $30,260,000$212,000,579 $141,986,000 Total: $120,832,751 $75,905,490 $81,893,866 $70,478,990 $71,410,990$1,265,532,049 $420,522,087 A - 8
6(&7,21±%
6DFUDPHQWR$UHD0DSV
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

B - 1

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

B - 2

COMMUNITY PLAN AREAS

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

B - 3

SHOVEL-READY AREAS

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

B - 4

NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION AREAS

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

B - 5

BIKEWAYS

6(&7,21±&
*HQHUDO3ODQ&RQVLVWHQF\
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

C - 1

INTRODUCTION
There are nine newly creat ed programs or projects in the 2022- 2027 CIP. Of these, seven are site-specific CIPs, including six park development/improvement projects and one roadway maintenance project. The remaining two items serve several locations or are citywide programs.

These two items include a program to replace existing street landscaping with drought-tolerant landscaping, and funding to implement technology upgrades to Solid Waste’s fleet management system.

An analysis is performed annually to determine the consistency of the CIP with the 2035 General Plan’s goals and policies. The analysis also looks at the Shovel-Ready Sites Program to gauge consistency with investments in opportunity areas.

The 2035 General Plan anticipates that much of the city’s growth will occur as infill. Infill development reutilizes existing urban areas for new construction. In October 2009, the City Council approved the Shovel-Ready Sites Program’s Tier 1 and Tier 2 priority areas to help implement the infill goals and policies, and to align programming guide criteria and CIP funding to focus resources toward new infrastructure projects in priority shovel-ready areas (Resolution No. 2009-0629).

In addition to identifying opportunities for growth, the 2035 General Plan also includes goals and policies dedicated to the pres ervation and enhancement of exis ting neighborhoods. Therefore, it is important to balance investment in shovel-ready areas with the maintenance of established communities. As such, projects continue to be identified in the Shovel-Ready Sites Program’s Tier 1 and 2 priority areas while balancing the needs of existing neighborhoods.

SHOVEL-READY AREAS
One key to consistency with the 2035 General Plan lies in the relationship between the CIP and the Shovel-Ready Areas. The Shovel-Ready Areas identify priority areas for city investment and were based on opportunity areas identified in the 2035 General Plan . Focusing growth and investment in the Shovel-Ready Areas will help Sacramento grow consistent with the vision, goals, and policies set forth in the General Plan.

The lists below and the following map identify th e shovel-ready opportunity areas identified as either Tier 1 or Tier 2 and were used to help inform the General Plan consistency finding.

Tier 1 Priority Area Sites (highest priority)
 Central City
 Swanston Station, Arden Fa ir, Point West, Cal Expo
 65 th Street/University Village, Sacramento Center for Innovation (south of CSUS and west of Power Inn Road), Granite Regional Park
 Florin Road
 Delta Shores

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

C - 2
Tier 2 Priority Area Sites
 North Natomas, Panhandle, Greenbriar
 North Sacramento, Robla, McClellan/Parker Homes
 Power Inn Area
 Other Infill Areas (Corridor s and Transit Station Areas)

Although some site-specific CIPs may be locat ed outside the Shovel-Ready areas, these CIPs address critical maintenance, repair, and renovations of existing facilities. The remainder of the CIPs are citywide in nature and address maintenance, repairs, rehabilitation, and improvements to existing infrastructure. All CIPs were indivi dually determined to be consistent with policies in the 2035 General Plan.

New FY2022/23 CIPs by Program Area
Section –
Program Area
Project
Number
Project Name Description
Section G –
Parks and
Recreation
L19115100 Winner’s Circle Park Expansion of basketball court from half to full court.

L19144100 Oakbrook Park
Improvements
Phase 2 Improvements per community
meeting and park masterplan to provide
shade over the existing playgrounds and
develop the undeveloped portion of the
park site.

L19911300 D5 CDBG Mangan and
Chorley Park
Improvements
Provide matching funds for CDBG grants
to pay for overhead costs. CDBG
projects to replace the playground,
basketball court, and archery range at
Mangan Park as well as replace the
playground at Chorley Park.

L19911400 D6 CDBG Median Park
MP, Nunn Playground,
& Camellia Park
Irrigation
Provide matching funds for CDBG grants
to pay for overhead costs. CDBG
projects to replace dated playground at
Danny Nunn Park and complete deferred
maintenance of irrigation system at
Camellia Park.

L19911500 Lawrence Park
Improvements
Provide matching funds for CDBG grants
to pay for overhead costs. CDBG project
to repair picnic areas and sports
features, and plant additional trees at
Lawrence Park.

L19911600 Thelma Hawk Park CDBG-funded project to develop a vacant neighborhood park site per
Thelma Hawk Park Master Plan.
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

C - 3

Section H –
Transportation
R15235000 Florin Depot Industrial
Park
Provide pavement maintenance to the
roadways that provide access at the
Florin Road Industrial Park.

This includes the following roadways:

Unsworth Avenue, Outfall Circle,
Younger Creek Drive, a portion of
Florin-Perkins Road, Sky Creek Drive,
Blue Sky Court, Light Sky Court, and a
portion of Elder Creek
Road.

R15235100 Drought Tolerant
Landscape
Replacement
Replace existing landscaping in the
street right-of-way with drought-tolerant
landscaping to promote water
conservation and meet current water
efficiency standards by reducing water
usage for landscaping in the street right-
of-way.

Section I –
Utilities
Y15000400 RSW Fleet
Management
Technology Program
The purpose of this program is to use
recent technology advances to increase
efficiency and productivity. This program
will implement fleet reporting and routing
analytics and Fleet Business Intelligence
tools to monitor equipment use and
performance.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

C - 4
FY2022/23 New, Site-Specific CIPs

6(&7,21±'
*HQHUDO*RYHUQPHQW
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
D - 1

INTRODUCTION
The General Government Program reflects the City’s commitment to focus resources toward preserving its existing facilities and continuing its programs through its “green building” and sustainable practices.

This Program utilizes the following goals and criteria to develop the five-year plan:

Program Goals
 Ensure public health and safety
 Increase efficiency
 Enhance quality of life
 Increase accessibility
 Improve transparency

Ranking Criteria
 Public safety
 Renewal/Replacement of wo rn/obsolete/failed components  Updates out-of-date software or equipment
 Increases accurate, open access to data
 Leverages existing resources
 Self-supporting (through fees)
 Increases or maintains sustainability

This Program is able to fund only the most critically needed pr ograms and relies on the use of available one-time funds for other important projects that focus on safety.

The General Government Program is divided into the following major subprograms:
 City Facilities
 Fee and Charge Supported
 Fleet Management
 Information Technology
 Libraries

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
D - 2

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 General Government Program Funding
by Subprogram Area (in thousands)
$3,830

*Information Technology subprogram is redirecting funding to operations in FY2022/23. See detail sheets for more information.

FY2022/23 General Government Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$3,830

*See funding chart on next page for more information.

City Facilities
$2,770
Fee and Charge
Supported
$1,551
Fleet Management
$200
Information
Technology
($691)*
General
($647)*
Measure U
$2,600
Development
Services
$1,551
Fleet
$202 Other*
$124
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
D - 3
FY2022/23 Program Funding
Fund #1 Fund Name # of CIPs2 Budget
1001 General Fund 6 (647,480)
2016 Development Services 2 1,551,000
2401 Measure U 2 2,600,000
3702 Capital Reimbursement 1 21,000
6004 Parking 1 50,000
6005 Water 1 825
6006 Wastewater 1 2,670
6010 Community Center 1 50,000
6501 Fleet 5 202,055
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $3,830,070
1Funds may be in several program areas and may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

2022-2027 General Government Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$26,012

Additional information on fundi ng sources and their restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be found by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

General
$3,491
Measure U
$13,400
Development
Services
$7,489
Fleet
$1,010
Other*
$622
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
D - 4

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The General Government Program includes a variety of programs and projects. The top-funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below by subprogram.

City Facilities
City Facility Reinvestment Program (C13900000, $10.9 million) This program strategically prioritizes the improvements needed to City facilities to ensure public safety, building code compliance, pres ervation, and energy efficiency. Public and employee safety is key. Funding for major pr ojects in FY2022/23 includes roof repairs, fire alarm upgrades, Old Sacramento boardwalk and dock improvements, and repairs and upgrades at the Front Street Animal Shelter.

Facility ADA Compliance Program (C13000400, $3.0 million) This program ensures that persons with disabilities have access to City programs, services and activities offered within City facilities. The program also recognizes that the City cannot immediately remediate all physica l barriers in compliance with the ADA and State requirements due to budgetary constraint. A prioritized phase of work that would provide the greatest level of access to the greatest number of people are being forwarded.

Projects scheduled in FY2022/23 include accessible parking upgrades at Belle Cooledge Community Center, Coloma Community Center, Del Paso Heights Library, and the Center for Sacramento History.

Fee and Charge Supported
Building Permit Technology Program (A21006600, $6.5 million) This self-funded program implements proc ess and technology needs related to development activities. The fees collect ed are used to develop, implement, and support various programs for the public including upgrades to the database of citywide development activity (Accela), the system fo r viewing details and statuses of building permit applications and permits (Online Citi zen Portal), and processes that expedite services to customers (Sacramento Streamline Initiative).

Information Technology
IT Replacement Program (A07000300, $3.4 million)
This ongoing program maintains and replac es network and telecommunications infrastructure systems necessary for comm unication between devices (computer to server) and people (e.g., phones, email). This program also ensures the integrity and availability of citywide IT enterprise re sources based on life cycle standards, current technologies, and best practice benchmarks. These highly complex systems support City operations and all essential City business systems.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program
D - 5
FY2022/23 Capital Projects and Programs
Non-site specific or multi-site projects are not shown

Note: Details for the project numbers listed on the map above are provided in alphabetical project order on the following pages.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A04000100
Updates technology and automation projects within the City Clerk’s office.Project Description Support the automation of City Clerk and citywide processes for greater efficiency and service delivery.Project Objectives The technology currently in use does not address all of the office’s automation needs.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
CITY CLERK AUTOMATION PROGRAMProject Name
$1,080,209 $617,942 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000Total $1,080,209 $617,942 $1,380,209Est. Project Cost
$300,000
$60,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$462,267Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
City ClerkProject Manager , Monica Lindholm
Project Location Citywide
D - 6
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A07000300
Ongoing program to maintain and replace IT telecommunications systems including voice over internet protocol (VoIP) equipment, voicemail, unified e- mail messaging, software and hardware licensing, physical and virtual server consolidation, data storage, network infrastructure, closed circuit television (CCTV) camera systems, mobile devices, and all related components based on industry standard life cycles.

Project Description
Ensure the integrity and availability of citywide IT enterprise resources based on life-cycle standards, current technologies, and best practices benchmarks.

Project Objectives
Funds continue the management, coordination, and budgeting of citywide IT resources, resulting in overall cost savings.

Existing Situation
To fund this program, departments are charged for telecommunications and other hardware replacement costs based on usage citywide. The “user fee” will be charged to all departments and does not result in additional General Fund costs.

Operating Budget
Impac
t
IT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$2,281,221 $0 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,0001001 GENERAL FUND $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000 $680,000Total $2,356,221 $0 $5,756,221Est. Project Cost
$3,400,000
$680,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,356,221Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Information TechnologyProject Manager , Darin Arcolino
Project Location Citywide
D - 7
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A07000400
The funding for this program will be used to expand and maintain the fiber optic infrastructure in the City.Project Description Achieve the level of connectivity that is needed for traffic control, network connectivity, and communication purposes between City facilities and other agencies.

Project Objectives
After review of existing infrastructure, it has been determined that there is a need to expand and maintain the fiber optic infrastructure in order to achieve the required level of city connectivity.

Existing Situation
This program’s costs are covered through fiber lease revenues from the Los Rios and Sacramento Libraries (Fund 3702).

Operating Budget
Impact
CITYWIDE FIBER EXPANSION PROGRAMProject Name
$429,438 $3,038 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$226,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
$15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03003 2003 CIRB
$166,746 $54,379 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,0003702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000 $21,000Total $877,184 $57,417 $982,184Est. Project Cost
$105,000
$21,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$819,767Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Information TechnologyProject Manager , Darin Arcolino
Project Location Citywide
D - 8
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A07000700
A comprehensive Digital Strategy provides the framework, prioritization, and multi-year action plan fo r delivering innovation and technology services that are streamli ned, effective, secure, and easily accessible by all.

Project Description
The execution of the Digital Strategy initiatives will expand access to information, more efficiently use resources, and improve the City’s ability to serve customers more effectively and transparently.

Project Objectives
In FY2022/23, $1,682,000 will be redirected to Information Technology Department operations for annual software maintenance and subscription costs for existing systems, and for Unified Endpoint Management implementation.

Existing Situation
Digital Strategy investments that have a citywide benefit will be allocated across the General Fund and appropriate enterprise funds through the City’s cost allocation process. Additionally, projects will result in operational efficiencies and process improvements citywide.

Operating Budget
Impac
t
DIGITAL STRATEGYProject Name
$1,682,000 $1,682,000 -$1,682,000 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$1,682,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $1,682,000 $1,682,000
$0Est. Project Cost
-$1,682,000
-$1,682,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Information TechnologyProject Manager , Ignacio Estevez Project Location Citywide
D - 9
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A07001600
Expand fiber optic infrastructure investments used to connect City services. As part of the City’s Public- Private Partnership (PPP) with Verizon, the City was given new fiber optic infrastructure anywhere that Verizon installed new fiber lines. This project will fund the final connection of the fiber communication lines to City facilities and industrial assets, such as traffic signals, fire stations, and community centers.

Project Description
This program will leverage last mile connectivity to and from Verizon-established physical hand off points.

The City's PPP with Verizon established approximately 200 network hand off locations that will allow the City to connect every fire station, sump, well, and traffic signal corridor to its fiber network.

Project Objectives
Interconnecting the City’s facilities and industrial assets will allow the City to operate more efficiently by reducing carrier dependency, commute times, and response time for repairs. It will also allow the City to provide digital services to underserved communities.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FIBER OPTIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMProject Name
$400,000 $353,464 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $400,000 $353,464 $1,400,000Est. Project Cost
$1,000,000
$200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$46,536Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Information TechnologyProject Manager , Darin Arcolino
Project Location Citywide
D - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A13000200
Funding for upgrades, replacement, or additions to the Fleet Management asset management and business intelligence performance monitoring tools.

Project Description
Implement integration required to establish fleet reporting analytics and Fleet Business Intelligence dashboard tools to monitor equipment use and performance.

Project Objectives
Funds are needed to continue to keep technology current for proper management of the Fleet Management asset management work order system and business intelligence reporting tools.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FLEET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMProject Name
$1,999,000 $261,782 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006501 FLEET MANAGEMENT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $1,999,000 $261,782 $2,249,000Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,737,218Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Mark Stevens
Project Location Citywide
D - 11
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A21006400
An ongoing program to implement automated processe s and to address technology needs related to development activities, funded through an automation surcharge of 8% on all planning entitlement applications (Resolution No. 2008-0195).

Project Description
Implement technology improvement objectives; develop systems to replace existing programs or provide information not currently available on existing systems; and provide tracking systems for permits and entitlements.

Project Objectives
The systems utilized for tracking development activities may not address all of the current and future automation needs.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
PLANNING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMProject Name
$1,058,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$1,884,513 $1,409,455 $212,000 $207,000 $202,000 $198,000 $204,0002016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$212,000 $207,000 $202,000 $198,000 $204,000Total $2,943,463 $1,409,455 $3,966,463Est. Project Cost
$1,023,000
$212,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,534,008Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Community DevelopmentProject Manager , Kim Swaback
Project Location Citywide
D - 12
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program A21006600
An automation surcharge of 8% is charged on plan check and permit fees (Resolution No. 2008-0195) to fund the technology improvements related to development activities.

Project Description
Implement technology improvement objectives, develop systems to replace existing programs or provide information not currently available on existing systems, and provide tracking systems for permits and entitlements.

Project Objectives
The systems utilized for tracking plans and building permits may not address all of the current and future automation needs.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BUILDING PERMIT TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMProject Name
$3,147,475 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$12,315,387 $8,199,644 $1,339,000 $1,309,000 $1,280,000 $1,251,000 $1,287,0002016 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,339,000 $1,309,000 $1,280,000 $1,251,000 $1,287,000Total $15,462,862 $8,199,644 $21,928,862Est. Project Cost
$6,466,000
$1,339,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$7,263,218Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Community DevelopmentProject Manager , Kim Swaback
Project Location Citywide
D - 13
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program B13000100
Consolidation and improvement of fleet service, repair facilities, and parts stores.Project Description Upgrade fleet shops as needed, including but not limited to lifts, air conditioning units, build shop components, and other permanent equipment and infrastructure.

Project Objectives
Fleet shops are in need of ongoing maintenance and upgrades as shop components come to the end o f their useful lives and new technology becomes available.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
FLEET FACILITIES PROGRAMProject Name
$1,988,251 $377,763 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006501 FLEET MANAGEMENT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $1,988,251 $377,763 $2,238,251Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,610,488Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Mark Stevens
Project Location Citywide
D - 14
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program C13000100
Fuel management, dispensing, storage, and monitoring systems require ongoing testing, maintenance, and upgrading to assure environmental protection. Th is program provides funding for upgrades and implements alternative fuel infrastructure.

Project Description
Expand technology and resources for all fueling requirements, including compressed natural gas, gasoline, diesel, and oil by replacing and updating failing or outdated fueling equipment, storage, and supporting infrastructure.

Project Objectives
This program implements the City Council’s fleet sustainability goals, which expands the use o f
alternative fuels and GPS telemetrics.

Existing Situation
Ongoing maintenance costs are recovered through a fuel surcharge.Operating Budget Impact
FUEL MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROGRAMProject Name $3,658,599 $364,033 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006501 FLEET MANAGEMENT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $3,658,599 $364,033 $3,908,599Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,294,566Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Mark Stevens
Project Location Citywide
D - 15
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program C13000200
The project provides funding for monitoring and remediation efforts in order to meet state requirements.Project Description Ongoing monitoring and soil and groundwater remediation to remove contamination.Project Objectives The City acquired property for the development of the Pannell Community Center where a dry cleane r business had previously been located. Extensive remediation of the contaminated soil and groundwate r has been performed since the City's acquisition of the property, and the contamination has been significantly reduced. However, it is estimated t hat the property will require ongoing remediation and cleanup through 2030 before the City can stop monitoring efforts.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
MEADOWVIEW REMEDIATION PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000Total $0 $0
$350,000Est. Project Cost
$350,000
$70,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
8 4
Public WorksProject Manage
r , James Christensen
Project Location 2450 Meadowview Road
D - 16
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program C13000400
Survey, classify, and prioritize conditions in City facilities that do not comply with state accessibility requirements and the American with Disability Act (ADA). The federal ADA was signed into law in July 1990.

Project Description
Comply with state and federal civil rights laws to eliminate physical barriers which cause discrimination to individuals with disabilities. Remediate conditions or barriers that hinder the participation of individuals with disabilities in City’s programs, services, and activities.

Project Objectives
City staff are currently delivering projects consistent with the City’s Facilities ADA Transition Plan. Public entities have an ongoing obligation to ensure that their programs, services, and activities are accessible to the public.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FACILITY ADA COMPLIANCE PROGRAMProject Name
$2,494,750 $441,523 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,0002401 MEASURE U $92,640 $92,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02603 GOLF
$1,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02605 ZOO
$26,421 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03704 OTHER CAPITAL GRANTS
$72,170 $50,141 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006004 PARKING $41 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06007 SOLID WASTE
$1,265,329 $291,024 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER $115,455 $274 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06501 FLEET MANAGEMENT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000Total $4,068,150 $875,234 $7,068,150Est. Project Cost
$3,000,000
$600,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,192,916Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Obi Agha
Project Location Citywide
D - 17
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program C13900000
This program provides funding for end-of-life cyc le replacement of facility components or major repairs due to deferred maintenance. In June 2018, staff completed the facility condition assessment to determine and prioritize capital replacement and maintenance needs.

Project Description
Repair or replace roofs, structural elements, plumbing, electrical service, mechanical systems, and exterior coatings of City facilities to ensure public safety, building code compliance, preservation, and energy efficiency.

Project Objectives
This program will be used for improvement projects at existing City facilities. Deferred maintenance at City facilities is currently estimated at approximately $50 million.

Existing Situation
Annual funding to this program prevents increased maintenance costs within the operating budget.Operating Budget Impact
CITY FACILITY REINVESTMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$390,652 $179,318 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$209,066 $209,066 $2,100,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,0002401 MEASURE U $1,575 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03002 2002 CIRB
$1,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03003 2003 CIRB
$1,643 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03006 2006 CAPITAL BONDS (TE)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,100,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000 $2,200,000Total $604,896 $388,384 $11,504,896Est. Project Cost
$10,900,000
$2,100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$216,512Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , James Christensen
Project Location Citywide
D - 18
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program C15000400
Maintain and replace security camera systems and all related components based on industry standard life cycles.

Project Description
Ensure the ongoing integrity and availability of security camera systems at City facilities.Project Objectives Many of the existing security camera systems are outdated, no longer functioning adequately, or not operating at all. Historically, security camera projects were funded for the installation but not for ongoing maintenance, support, and standard life cycle replacement. This program will address these issues.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
SECURITY CAMERA REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$239,896 $141,969 $24,520 $24,520 $24,520 $24,520 $24,5201001 GENERAL FUND $6,125 $5,069 $825 $825 $825 $825 $8256005 WATER
$19,835 $17,935 $2,670 $2,670 $2,670 $2,670 $2,6706006 WASTEWATER $15,265 $13,653 $2,055 $2,055 $2,055 $2,055 $2,0556501 FLEET MANAGEMENT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$30,070 $30,070 $30,070 $30,070 $30,070Total $281,121 $178,626 $431,471Est. Project Cost
$150,350
$30,070
2022 - 2027 Funding
$102,495Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Information TechnologyProject Manager , Ignacio Estevez Project Location Citywide
D - 19
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program D13000200
Provide incremental funding for the purchase of alternative fuel, electric, plug-in hybrid, and hybrid vehicle equipment purchases and additional alternative fuel infrastructure.

Project Description
Purchases of alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles and al ternative fuel infrastructure. Assist in complying with the City’s Fleet Sustainability Policy to replace a minimum of 50% of fleet equipment purchases with alternative fuel vehicles.

Project Objectives
The historical level of funding for the purchase of replacement vehicles does not provide for the additional incremental cost to accelerate the migration of the fleet to alternative fuels and/or hybrid vehicles.

Existing Situation
Fleet operating costs and greenhouse gas emissions should decline as the City’s fleet is migrated to alternative fuels, thereby reducing petroleum consumption.

Operating Budget
Impac
t
FLEET ALTERNATIVE FUEL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name $776,454 $67,787 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006501 FLEET MANAGEMENT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $776,454 $67,787 $1,026,454Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$708,667Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Mark Stevens
Project Location Citywide
D - 20
6(&7,21±(
3XEOLF6DIHW\
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

E - 1

INTRODUCTION
The Public Safety Program establishes and supports capital projects that are consistent with the City’s 2035 General Plan. The Public Safety Program is designed to ensure both fire and police operational facilities are conducive to efficient, safe, and effective operations.

Adequate funding is not available to address the facility needs of the Police Department and the Fire Department. These larger capital repai r and/or replacement needs are evaluated and prioritized as one-time resources are identified.

This program focuses resources toward pr ograms that have ongoi ng funding requirements necessary to address repairs, replacement, and upgrades to the City’s public safety infrastructure.

Program Goals
 Protect public health and safety
 Provide reliable infrastructure for operations
 Increase efficiency

Ranking Criteria
 Public safety
 Renewal/replacement of worn /obsolete/failed components  Leverages existing resources
 Increases or maintains sustainability and accessibility

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 Public Safety Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$15,798

General
$15,798
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

E - 2
FY2022/23 Program Funding
Fund #1 Fund Name # of CIPs2 Budget
1001 General 8 15,797,600
TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY $15,797,600
1Funds may be in several program areas and may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

2022-2027 Public Safety Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$52,316

Additional information on fundi ng sources and their restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be found by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

General
$52,316
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

E - 3

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The Public Safety Program includes a variet y of programs and projec ts. The top-funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below.

Fire Apparatus Program (F12000300, $16.8 million)
This program is evaluated annua lly to determine future capita l needs in order to avoid spikes in annual funding requirements. The replacement schedule for emergency vehicles is evaluated annually to determine the funding necessary in future years.

Body Worn Camera and Conductive Electrical Device Program (F11100500, $9.5 million)
This program supports the deployment of body worn cameras for police officers citywide, including equipment and data storage. Body worn cameras are used to improve law enforcement interactions with the public by providing audio and visual recordings, helping to strengthen accountability, transparency, and de-escalation of conflict. The program also funds purchases of conductive electr ical devices including accessories equipment, storage, software, and periodic device replacement. Funding is evaluated annually.

Advanced Life Support Equipment Program (F12000200, $7.5 million) This program provides long-term, sustainable funding over multiple years to be used for the purchase of capital equipment needs. The replacement sc hedule for medical equipment and ambulances is evaluated annually to determine the funding necessary in future years to avoid spikes in annual funding requirements.

Fire Safety Equipment Program (F12000500, $5.3 million) Purchase of safety equipment including se lf-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) packs and bottles, and personal protective equipment (PPE). The purchase of this safety equipment is necessary to meet state and federal regulatory requirements and is critical in fire service. Funding is evaluated annually.

Police Safety Equipment Program (F11100800, $4.4 million) The program provides funding to purchase safety equipment for use by sworn officers, including radios and body armor. Funding is evaluated annually.

Police Department IT Critical Infrastructure Program (F11100600, $3.1 million) This program provides funding to purchase mission critical technology infrastructure including data storage, network infrastructure, software, electronic citation platform, and backup solutions. Funding is evaluated annually.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F11100500
The funding for this program will be used to maintain body-worn cameras (BWCs) and conductive electrical devices (CEDs) including accessories, equipment, storage, software, and periodic device upgrades.

Project Description
To improve accountability and transparency within the Police Department. BWCs are used as tools to improvement law enforcement interactions with the public by providing visual and audio records o f
interactions. CEDs are used as a less-than-lethal force option in certain volatile situations.

Project Objectives
The Police Department received a federal grant to develop and implement the BWC program. Continued funding is required to ensure the continuity of the program. The Department’s current CEDs are obsolete and no longer carried by the manufacturer. The Department needs to replace its obsolete CEDs with a modern, contemporary model.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t

BODY WORN CAMERA AND CONDUCTIVE ELECTRICAL DEVICE

PROGRAM
Project Name
$2,265,080 $568,881 $1,594,500 $1,644,500 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,0001001 GENERAL FUND $2,331,000 $418,013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
$587,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02801 CAL EPA
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,594,500 $1,644,500 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000Total $5,183,080 $986,895 $14,722,080Est. Project Cost
$9,539,000
$1,594,500
2022 - 2027 Funding
$4,196,185Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
PoliceProject Manager , Natalie Weaver
Project Location Citywide
E - 4
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F11100600
The funding for this program will be used to purchase mi ssion critical technology infrastructure including data storage, network infrastructure, software, electronic citation platform, and backup solutions.

Project Description
Ensure the continuity of Police Department IT critical infrastructure.Project Objectives After a review of existing IT infrastructure, it has been determined that there is a need to provide funding to ensure the integrity of IT infrastructure according to life-cycle standards, state/federal mandates concerning network security as it relates to accessing confidential information, current technologies, and best practices.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
POLICE DEPARTMENT IT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMProject Name $2,623,870 $1,227,275 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $625,000 $625,0001001 GENERAL FUND $400,000 $171,046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $625,000 $625,000Total $3,023,870 $1,398,321 $6,073,870Est. Project Cost
$3,050,000
$600,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,625,549Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
PoliceProject Manager , Natalie Weaver
Project Location Citywide
E - 5
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F11100700
The funding for this program will be used to replace/upgrade the mobile data computers (MDCs), in-ca r camera (ICC) systems, and ballistic door panels on police patrol vehicles.

Project Description
Ensure the operations of the Police Department patrol fleet.Project Objectives The Police Department mobile data computer (MDC) and in-car camera (ICC) systems are out o f warranty and beyond their useful life.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact

POLICE DEPARTMENT FLEET EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY

PROGRAM
Project Name
$385,860 $7,003 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,0001001 GENERAL FUND $2,953,494 $296,413 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Total $3,339,354 $303,416 $8,339,354Est. Project Cost
$5,000,000
$1,000,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,035,938Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
PoliceProject Manager , Natalie Weaver
Project Location Citywide
E - 6
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F11100800
The funding for this program will be used to purchase safety equipment for use by sworn officers, including radios, body armor, and less-than-lethal equipment.

Project Description
Ensure the safety of the community and Police Department sworn officers.Project Objectives The Police Department regularly purchases safety equipment. Continued funding is necessary to ensure sworn officers are supplied with the appropriate and necessary equipment to carry out their duties.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
POLICE SAFETY EQUIPMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$1,135,740 $880,740 $881,000 $881,000 $881,000 $881,000 $881,0001001 GENERAL FUND $2,031,463 $874,806 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$881,000 $881,000 $881,000 $881,000 $881,000Total $3,167,203 $1,755,546 $7,572,203Est. Project Cost
$4,405,000
$881,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,411,657Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
PoliceProject Manager , Natalie Weaver
Project Location Citywide
E - 7
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F12000200
Purchase of medical equipment and ambulances for use in advanced life support (ALS) services.Project Description ALS equipment and vehicle purchases cross fiscal years. The objective of this project is to establish a long-term funding plan that will provide sustainable funding over multiple years to be used for the purchase of capital equipment needs. The replacement schedule for medical equipment and ambulances is evaluated annually to determine the funding necessary in future years to avoid spikes in annual funding requirements.

Project Objectives
Expenditures related to medical equipment and ambulances are covered by revenues collected through the City’s ALS/Ambulance Service. Existing appropriations and expenditures are managed in separate projects for equipment and ambulances.

Existing Situation
Funding for operations and maintenance is budgeted in the Fire Department operating budget.Operating Budget Impac
t
ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$650,000 $647,484 $4,917,100 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$4,917,100 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000Total $650,000 $647,484 $8,167,100Est. Project Cost
$7,517,100
$4,917,100
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,516Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
FireProject Manager , Allison Narramore
Project Location Citywide
E - 8
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F12000300
Purchase of emergency response vehicles including fire trucks, engines, hazardous materials vehicles, and other large apparatus purchases that cross fiscal years.

Project Description
Establishing a long-term funding plan that will provide sustainable funding over multiple years to be used for the purchase of capital equipment needs. There is an existing replacement schedule for all of the City’s Fleet assets. The replacement vehicles schedule is evaluated annually to determine the funding necessary in future years to avoid spikes in annual funding requirements.

Project Objectives
The five-year program for replacement vehicles is based on cash funding.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FIRE APPARATUS PROGRAMProject Name
$34,136,582 $1,452,409 $4,800,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,0001001 GENERAL FUND $2,585,700 $806,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
$16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03003 2003 CIRB
$37,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03004 2006 CIRB TAX-EXEMPT (TE) $331,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03005 2006 CIRB - TAXABLE (TX) $93,933 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03006 2006 CAPITAL BONDS (TE)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$4,800,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000Total $37,200,215 $2,258,731 $54,000,215Est. Project Cost
$16,800,000
$4,800,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$34,941,484Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
FireProject Manager , Allison Narramore
Project Location Citywide
E - 9
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F12000500
Purchase of safety equipment including self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) packs and bottles, personal protective equipment (PPE), and miscella neous safety equipment. The purchase of this safety equipment is necessary to meet state and federal regulatory requirements and is a critical component o f the PPE used in fire service.

Project Description
Establish a long-term funding plan that will provide sustainable funding over multiple years. The equipment has an estimated 10-year life cycle (SCBA bottles have a 15-year cycle).

Project Objectives
Due to CalOSHA requirements, periodic replacements of PPE, SCBA, and safety equipment is necessary.

Existing Situation
$600,000 of the annual funding for the PPE budget is supported by intergovernmental transfer (IGT) revenues.

Operating Budget
Impac
t
FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$5,847,207 $1,238,814 $1,855,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,855,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000 $850,000Total $5,847,207 $1,238,814 $11,102,207Est. Project Cost
$5,255,000
$1,855,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$4,608,393Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
FireProject Manager , Allison Narramore
Project Location Citywide
E - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program F13000300
Install standby generators at the Public Safety Administration Building (PSAB), fire stations, and othe r facilities that are essential to emergency response and disaster recovery. Station 14 will be delivered with the construction of this replacement station. Priority A fire stations: 17, 18, and 57. Priority B fire stations:
4 and 9.

Project Description
Install generators at existing essential facilities. Generators have been installed at the following fire stations: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20, 30, 56, and 60. Standby generators have also been installed at the PSAB, the Fire Department's Training Tower, a City water tower, and the City’s main data center. In addition, a generator load bank connection switch gear was installed at the 911 facility to facilitate the regular testing of the generators.

Project Objectives
The current funding level for this program provides funding for one station to be completed every othe r
year.

Existing Situation
Operating costs related to generator maintenance are estimated to be $800 per year, per generator.Operating Budget Impact

PUBLIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES GENERATOR UPGRADE

PROGRAM
Project Name
$1,233,697 $224,832 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,0001001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000Total $1,233,697 $224,832 $1,983,697Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,008,865Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Joseph Gluvers
Project Location Citywide
E - 11
6(&7,21±)
&RQYHQWLRQ&XOWXUHDQG/HLVXUH
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

F - 1

INTRODUCTION
The Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program promotes and preserves the City’s unique cultural heritage by delivering accessible arts, leisure, and educ ational experiences to enrich people's lives and enhance the metropolitan area. The Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program is designed to enrich the quality of life and to contribute to a vibrant metropolitan region by providing exceptional cultural, artistic, and leisure opportunities.

This Program has been prepared by the Department of Conventi on and Cultural Services staff utilizing the goals and criteria listed below.

Program Goals
• Provide clean and well-maintained grounds, facilities, and equipment • Enhance the economic and cultural vitality of the city through cultural facilities • Maintain and increase client and patron satisfaction
• Provide high quality, safe, and accessible facilities

Ranking Criteria
• Meet legal, health, and safety requirements
• Maintain and improve facilities to ensure the public’s comfort and enjoyment • Improve marketability of SAF E Credit Union Convention and Pe rforming Arts District to increase attendance
• Prevent damage to facilities and watercraft

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$2,710

Marina
$100
Community Center
$2,610
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

F - 2
FY2022/23 Program Funding
Fund #1 Fund Name # of CIPs2 Budget
2608 Marina 1 100,000
6010 Community Center 5 2,610,000
TOTAL CONVENTION, CULTURE, AND LEISURE $2,710,000
1Funds may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

2022-2027 Convention, Culture, and Leisure Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$8,205

Additional information on fundi ng sources and their restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be found by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

The ongoing pandemic has impacted certain rev enue sources including transient occupancy taxes, which this program area primarily relies on for funding. These revenues have recovered from pandemic lows more quickly than anticipated, but they are still below pre-pandemic levels.

Funding for projects which rely on these revenues has increased compared to the FY2021/22 CIP, reflecting modest recovery from the pandemic. Staff will continue to monitor these revenues and recommend program adjustments for Council consideration should revenue estimates change significantly.

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The Convention, Culture and Leisure Program includes a variety of programs and projects. In September 2018, City Council authorized the issuance of bonds to expand and renovate the Marina
$340
Community Center
$7,865
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

F - 3
SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District. In July 2019, City Council authorized the issuance of additional bonds to construct a new ballroom for the SAFE Credit Union Convention Center. These renovation and expansion efforts are nearly complete. In FY2021/22, all three facilities were open simultaneously for the first time since closing for renovation.

Funding is required for ongoing improvements outside the scope of t he Convention Center Complex Renovation Project. The top-funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below.

Performing Arts Center Improvements Program (M17101800, $3.9 million) This program provides for improvements, repairs, and/or replacements for the SAFE Credit Union Performing Arts Center that are needed but not included in the Convention Center Complex Renovation Project schedule due to timing and financial constraints.

Funding for this program is based on the estimated fees to be co llected from the SAFE Credit Union Performing Arts Center Facility Fee.

Convention Center Production Equipment Upgrades (M17101700, $1.5 million) This program upgrades and replaces existing production equipment (e.g., lighting, sound, and stage craft equipment) at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District. Funding is based on the number of upgrades and replacements that need to take place in the next five years.

Memorial Auditorium Improvements Program (M17101000, $1.3 million) This program addresses deferred maintenance, facility improvements, and renovation needs at the historic Sacramento Memorial Auditorium. Funding is based on the number of improvements that need to take place in the next five years that is outside of the scope of the Convention Center Complex Renovation Project.

Community Center Improvements Program (M17100000, $950,000) This program provides funding for major improvements, repairs, or equipment for the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Ar ts District to prolong or enhance the current conditions. Funding is based on the number of improvements and repairs that need to take place in the next five years that is outside of the scope of the Convention Center Complex Renovation Project.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

F - 4
FY2022/23 Capital Projects and Programs
Non-site specific or multi-site projects are not shown

Note: Details for the project numbers listed on the map above are provided in alphabetical project order on the following pages.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17100000
Provide funding for major improvements, repairs, or equipment for the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District to prolong or enhance its current conditions.

Project Description
Protect employees and the public from potential safety hazards and ensure continued, uninterrupted operation of the facility.

Project Objectives
The SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District is more than 40 years old. Funding fo r
major improvements, repairs, or equipment is essential to continue operations at the facilities.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name
$2,237,059 $1,308,025 $150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $2,237,059 $1,308,025 $3,187,059Est. Project Cost
$950,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$929,034Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manager , Matthew Voreyer Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 5
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17100300
Prolong and/or enhance the City-owned audio-visual (AV) equipment and systems at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District.

Project Description
Meet client expectations for reliable equipment, maintain operational competitiveness, and protect employees and the public from potential hazards.

Project Objectives
It is prudent to accumulate funds needed to upgrade and/or replace existing City-owned AV equipment and infrastructure in order to avoid future failure.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
CONVENTION CENTER AUDIO-VISUAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name $434,053 $148,11 5 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $06010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0Total $434,053 $148,11 5
$484,053Est. Project Cost
$50,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$285,938Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manage
r , Matthew Voreyer
Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 6
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17100500
Upgrade/replace the existing chillers at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District as needed.

Project Description
Meet legal, health, and safety requirements to protect the public and employees and ensure a reliable ai r conditioning system for clients.

Project Objectives
Although maintenance is performed regularly, the accumulation of funding in the event of a major failure is prudent.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
CONVENTION CENTER CHILLER UPGRADE PROGRAMProject Name
$337,000 $25,11 9 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000Total $337,000 $25,11 9
$412,000Est. Project Cost
$75,000
$25,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$311,881Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manager , Matthew Voreyer Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 7
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17100700
Assess and upgrade the existing security system at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District.

Project Description
Improve public safety, increase user satisfaction, and minimize interruptions to facility operations.Project Objectives The current security system has been upgraded with additional cameras installed over the past three years. Additional funding will be necessary to continue to maintain and replace equipment and refresh with current technology.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
COMMUNITY CENTER SECURITY SYSTEM PROGRAMProject Name
$540,000 $193,109 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $06010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0Total $540,000 $193,109
$590,000Est. Project Cost
$50,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$346,891Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manage
r , Matthew Voreyer
Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 8
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17101000
Address deferred maintenance, facility improvements, and renovation needs at the historic Sacramento Memorial Auditorium.

Project Description
Ensure the historic City facility continues to provide a clean and well-maintained venue for the public while meeting health, safety, and historic preservation requirements.

Project Objectives
Ongoing funding will be used for future requirements as identified. FY2021/22 Facility Fees will be utilized to repair roof; purchase electronic winches to raise/lower chandeliers, and paint the Jean Runyan Little Theater.

Existing Situation
In FY2022/23, $125,000 of funding will come from the operating budget’s Memorial Auditorium Facility Fee. The proposed projects for FY2022/23 are install cameras/card readers, and restore/repair main floo r
and edging around main floor.

Operating Budget
Impact
MEMORIAL AUDITORIUM IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name
$80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$3,053,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03004 2006 CIRB TAX-EXEMPT (TE) $3,053,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03701 TAX INCREMENT
$3,380,823 $2,039,499 $260,000 $305,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$260,000 $305,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000Total $9,566,823 $2,039,499 $10,881,823Est. Project Cost
$1,315,000
$260,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$7,527,324Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manage
r , Matthew Voreyer
Project Location 1515 J Street
F - 9
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17101600
Fund the replacement of durable equipment (e.g., chai rs, tables, and stage risers) for the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District.

Project Description
Replace equipment (every five to ten years) to improve the look of the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District and to improve safety needs.

Project Objectives
Consistent and repetitive use of the durable equipment at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District accelerates normal wear and tear of the equipment. Funds are needed to regularly replace these essential items.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t

CONVENTION CENTER DURABLE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT

PROGRAM
Project Name
$515,000 $336,336 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000Total $515,000 $336,336
$565,000Est. Project Cost
$50,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$178,664Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manager , Matthew Voreyer Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17101700
Upgrade and replace existing production equipment (e.g., lighting, sound, and stage craft equipment) at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District.

Project Description
Enhance the current conditions at the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District to help retain current clients and attract new clients to the SAFE Credit Union Convention and Performing Arts District.

Project Objectives
Upgrades to the existing production equipment will be required to keep up with ever changing technology.

The upgrades will aid in the ability to retain current clients and attract additional prospective clients.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t

CONVENTION CENTER PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT UPGRADES

PROGRAM
Project Name
$710,000 $710,000 $1,400,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,400,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000Total $710,000 $710,000 $2,210,000Est. Project Cost
$1,500,000
$1,400,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manager , Matthew Voreyer Project Location 1400 J Street
F - 11
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17101800
Provide for improvements, repairs, and/or replac ements for the SAFE Credit Union Performing Arts Center.

Project Description
To continue to provide a well-maintained, competitive, and cost-effective venue.Project Objectives This funding is for additional improvements not included in the current renovation schedule due to timing/financial constraints.

Existing Situation
In FY2022/23, $775,000 of funding will come from the operating budget’s Performing Arts Center Facility Fee.

Operating Budget
Impac
t
PERFORMING ARTS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name $1,550,000 $1,550,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,0006010 COMMUNITY CENTER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$775,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000Total $1,550,000 $1,550,000 $5,425,000Est. Project Cost
$3,875,000
$775,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manage
r , Matthew Voreyer
Project Location 1301 L Street
F - 12
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program M17500400
Provide funding for retrofitting, major repairs, and improvements at the Sacramento Marina as needed.Project Description Provide clean and well-maintained facilities and equipment. Make improvements to remain competitive with other area marinas.

Project Objectives
The Sacramento Marina completed a major renovation of the South Basin in 2008. This funding will primarily focus on identified needs in the North Basin since those berths were constructed over 20 years ago.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
MARINA IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name
$847,645 $578,870 $100,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,0002608 MARINA $125,493 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06009 MARINA (ENTERPRISE)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000Total $973,138 $578,870 $1,313,138Est. Project Cost
$340,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$394,268Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 2
Public WorksProject Manager , Keith Underwood
Project Location 2710 Ramp Way
F - 13
6(&7,21±*
3DUNVDQG5HFUHDWLRQ
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

G - 1

INTRODUCTION
The Parks and Recreation Program reflects the Ci ty’s goal to optimize the experience of its citizens through parks, recreational facilities, and the preservation of open space. The Parks and Recreation Program is designed to address the City Council’s commitment to improving the quality of life through a robust park system, with an emphasis on renovating and rehabilitating aging park amenities within the system.

This Program utilizes the Park Project Programming Guide’s goals and criteria, the Deferred Maintenance List, the Pools Asse ssment, and input from the City Council to develop the five- year plan.

Program Goals
 Provide an integrated system of parks, open space areas, and recreational facilities that are safe and connect the diverse communities of Sacramento  Plan and develop parks, recreation, and co mmunity facilities that enhance community livability, are equitably distributed throughout the city, and are responsive to the needs and interests of residents, employees, and visitors
 Secure adequate and reliable funding fo r the acquisition, development, and maintenance of parks, recreation facilities, and open space

Ranking Criteria
Projects are evaluated and grouped within each of the ten Community Plan Areas (CPAs) for consistency with the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, last updated in 2009. An update to this plan, Parks Plan 2040, is anticipated to be completed in Spring 2022.

The criteria in each CPA focuses on:
 Neighborhood, community,
and/or regional need
 Funding availability for
ongoing maintenance
 Site significance, public
priority or public use, and
suitability to the area
 Priority to economically
disadvantaged
neighborhoods
 Health, safety, or legal
mandates
 Land availability
 Cost offsets/partnerships

Airfield Park

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

G - 2

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 Parks and Recreation Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$2,915

FY2022/23 Program Funding

Fund #1 Fund Name # of CIPs2 Budget
1001 General Fund 1 240,000
2020 South Natomas Community
Infrastructure Fund 4 0
3204 Park Development Impact Fee (PIF) 10 2,675,000
TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION $2,915,000
1Funds may be in several program areas and may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

Mae Fong Soccer Field
General
$240
PIF
$2,675

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

G - 3
2022-2027 Parks and Recreation Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$3,875

Additional information on fundi ng sources and their restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be found by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

Oki Park Playground

General
$1,200
PIF
$2,675

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

G - 4

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The Parks and Recreation Program includes a variety of programs and projects. The top-funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below.

Sutter’s Landing Park Program (L19167000, $1.2 million) Sutter’s Landing Park is a decommissioned City landfill and waste transfer station. The objective of the program is to transform the open, available area into a regional park that can serve the recreational needs of the community. This programmatic funding is directed from the revenue received from the onsite billboard.

Blackbird Park Phase 2 (L19109210, $800,000)
This project will support construction of two futsal courts at Blackbird Park as well as fencing around the baseball fields.

Oakbrook Park Improvements (L19144100, $600,000)
This project will support providing shade for play structures and development of the undeveloped portion of the park site, as part of Phase 2 improvements of this park.

Barandas Park

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

G - 5
FY2022/23 Capital Projects and Programs
Non-site specific projects are not shown

Note: Details for the project numbers listed on the map above are provided in alphabetical project order on the following pages.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19109210
Construction of two futsal courts at Blackbird Park and fencing around baseball fields.Project Description Implement next phase of park construction.Project Objectives Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the park master plan have been constructed, and more funding is needed fo r amenities.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
BLACKBIRD PARK PHASE 2Project Name
$160,408 $145,747 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $160,408 $145,747
$960,408Est. Project Cost
$800,000
$800,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$14,661Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
1 10
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 3765 Hovnanian Drive
G - 6
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19115100
Expansion of basketball court from half court to full court.Project Description To expand basketball court.Project Objectives
Currently a half court basketball court.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
WINNER’S CIRCLE PARKProject Name
$0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$100,000Est. Project Cost
$100,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2024
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
2 8
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 2415 Evergreen Street
G - 7
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19144100
Phase 2 Improvements per community meeting and park master plan.Project Description Provide shade over the existing playgrounds and develop the undeveloped portion of the park site.Project Objectives Currently no shade over the playground and a portion of the park remains undeveloped.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
OAKBROOK PARK IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$0 $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$600,000Est. Project Cost
$600,000
$600,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2024
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
3 9
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 3341 Soda Way
G - 8
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19156600
Improvements at South Natomas Community Center.Project Description Remaining funding will be used for removal of BMX track, grading, removal of fencing, and addition o f turf.

Project Objectives
Funding has been allocated to this CIP from the sale of a parcel and will benefit the District. In FY2022/23, $355,643 will be transferred to the Thelma Hawk Park Project (L19911600).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PARK IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$499,408 $472,728 -$355,643 $0 $0 $0 $02020 S. NATOMAS (SN) CIF $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02021 S. NATOMAS FBA
$98,140 $14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02508 QUIMBY ACT
$348,537 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$355,643 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $948,585 $472,742
$592,942Est. Project Cost
-$355,643
-$355,643
2022 - 2027 Funding
$475,843Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2015
July 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
3 9
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 2881 Truxel Road
G - 9
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19162500
Improvements to Hidalgo bust at Southside Park.Project Description Provide a new stand and surrounding landscape and updating related plaques. Partnering with Art in Public Places to contribute towards restoration of Hidalgo bust, provide a new pedestal, and provide a small plaza with landscaping.

Project Objectives
Hidalgo bust is in need of repairs.Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
SOUTHSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$372,400 $324,218 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02508 QUIMBY ACT
$245,000 $159,015 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $617,400 $483,232
$717,400Est. Project Cost
$100,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$134,168Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2024
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
YPCEProject Manager , Raymond Costantino
Project Location 2115 6th Street
G - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19167000
Design and construction of facilities and amenities for Sutter’s Landing Regional Park.Project Description Convert a decommissioned City l andfill and waste transfer station to a regional park to serve the recreational needs of the community.

Project Objectives
Billboard revenue is the primary source of funding for Sutter’s Landing Regional Park.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
SUTTER’S LANDING PARK PROGRAMProject Name
$1,242,729 $629,462 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,0001001 GENERAL FUND $7,699 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02508 QUIMBY ACT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000Total $1,250,428 $629,463 $2,450,428Est. Project Cost
$1,200,000
$240,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$620,965Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
YPCEProject Manager , Raymond Costantino
Project Location 20 28th St
G - 11
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19188100
Renovation of existing restroom at East Portal Park.Project Description Additional funding to renovate restroom and accessible path of travel at East Portal Park to support various activities including Little League, Bocce Ball, and Concerts in the Park, including general public use.

Project Objectives
Current restroom is out of date and not ADA compliant. As part of an existing building, a custom rathe r than prefab renovation is needed.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
EAST PORTAL PARK RESTROOM RENOVATIONProject Name
$350,000 $350,000 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $350,000 $350,000
$500,000Est. Project Cost
$150,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
July 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 6
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 1120 Rodeo Way
G - 12
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19270000
In FY2013/14, with the approval of Resolution No. 2014-0415, funding was transferred to the Rio Tierra Baseball Field Project (L19270000) to repair the irrigation well and one field and to provide fencing.

Project Description
To complete various renovation activities including repairing an irrigation well and providing fencing around one of the fields.

Project Objectives
The project objectives have been met and funding remains available for use in South Natomas Community Plan Area. In FY2022/23, $108,357 will be transferred to the Thelma Hawk Park Project (L19911600).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TWUSD-RIO TIERRA BASEBALL FLDProject Name
$1,421,627 $108,358 -$108,357 $0 $0 $0 $02020 S. NATOMAS (SN) CIF Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$108,357 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $1,421,627 $108,358
$1,313,270Est. Project Cost
-$108,357
-$108,357
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,313,269Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2008
July 2022
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
3 9
YPCEProject Manager , Raymond Costantino
Project Location 3201 Northstead Drive
G - 13
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19290000
Prepare a neighborhood park master plan and design and construct phase one improvements for this 3.3 acre parcel to serve the river bend neighborhood. Phase one improvements will be scoped to budget with public input on spending priorities.

Project Description
Design and develop a neighborhood park on this existing City-owned parcel.Project Objectives This project has been completed and can be closed. Remaining funds will be transferred to Thelma Hawk Park (L19911600).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
PARK SITE SN2 MASTER PLAN & PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTSProject Name $116,000 $116,000 -$116,000 $0 $0 $0 $02020 S. NATOMAS (SN) CIF Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $116,000 $116,000
$0Est. Project Cost
-$116,000
-$116,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012
July 2022
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
3 9
YPCEProject Manager , Raymond Costantino
Project Location 2126 Garden Highway
G - 14
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19300000
To allocate citywide park impact fees to annual priority projects as per Resolution No. 2019-0242.Project Description To utilize the Citywide Parks and Facilities Fee to benefit regional parks and citywide park facilities based on Resolution No. 2017-0070.

Project Objectives
The Citywide Parks and Facilities Fee was established in 2018 and a priority list of projects has been established with Resolution No. 2019-0242.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
CITYWIDE PARK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$750,000Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$750,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
YPCEProject Manager , Raymond Costantino
Project Location Citywide
G - 15
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19911300
Provide matching funds to pay for overhead costs with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.

Project Description
City staff to deliver CDBG projects to replace playground, basketball court, and archery range at Mangan Park as well as playground replacement at Chorley Park.

Project Objectives
CDBG grants do not cover overhead costs for City staff.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
D5 CDBG MANGAN AND CHORLEY PARK IMPROVEMENTSProject Name $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$30,000Est. Project Cost
$30,000
$30,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5 2, 4
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 2140 34th Ave & 7063 20th Street
G - 16
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19911400
Provide matching funds to pay for overhead costs with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.

Project Description
City staff to deliver CDBG projects to replace dated playground at Danny Nunn Park and deferred maintenance of irrigation system at Camellia Park.

Project Objectives
CDBG grants do not cover overhead costs for City staff.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
D6 CDBG MEDIAN PARK MP, NUNN PLAYGROUND, CAMELLIA PAR K

IRRIGATION
Project Name
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$45,000Est. Project Cost
$45,000
$45,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
6 5
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 6920 Power Inn Road & 6650 Cougar Drive G - 17
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19911500
Provide matching funds to pay for overhead costs with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.

Project Description
City staff to deliver CDBG project to repair picnic areas and sports features and plant additional trees.Project Objectives CDBG grants do not cover overhead costs for City staff.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
LAWRENCE PARK IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$50,000Est. Project Cost
$50,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
6 5
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 5130 Mcglashan St
G - 18
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19911600
Park site is being planned through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. These funds will be used to implement the plan.

Project Description
Develop park site per master plan.Project Objectives
Undeveloped parcel of parkland.Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
THELMA HAWK PARKProject Name
$0 $0 $580,000 $0 $0 $0 $02020 S. NATOMAS (SN) CIF
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$580,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$580,000Est. Project Cost
$580,000
$580,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
December 2024
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
3 9
YPCEProject Manager , Jason Wiesemann
Project Location 2324 Thelma Ave
G - 19
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program L19920000
Adhere to City Code Chapter 2.84.110, which mandates that “at least 2% of the total cost [of eligible construction projects] shall be expended for public ar t.” Subprojects for each Community Planning Area (CPA) and their budgets are not reflected here.

Project Description
Combine the 2% Art in Public Places funding from the various park development projects in each CPA to allow the creation of significant artwork at parks within each CPA where the money was collected.

Allocate funding to each area once development in that area commences.

Project Objectives
Each eligible park or recreation CIP budget has 2% set aside for the mandate.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAMProject Name
$91,500 $91,500 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $03204 PARK DEVEL. IMPACT FEE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $91,500 $91,500
$141,500Est. Project Cost
$50,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Convention & Cultural ServicesProject Manager , Donald Gensler Project Location Citywide
G - 20
6(&7,21±+
7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 1

INTRODUCTION
The City is responsible for maintaining and upgrading an aging transportation network that serves hundreds of thousands of users, includi ng automobiles, trucks, buses, trains, bikes, pedestrians, and scooters for user s of all modes and abilities. Resources to maintain and improve the transportation network come from a variety of sour ces, primarily the countywide transportation sales tax, state gas taxes, federal and state funding, and special fees and taxes.

Transportation funding has not kept pace with inflation, and in some cases funding has declined, creating challenges in provid ing needed transportation system maintenance and in providing capital improvements to address safety, ne twork expansions, modernization, and upgrading.

The City has significant unfunded needs in terms of maintenance and r ehabilitation of the existing transportation network (pavement, br idges, bikeways, traffic control equipment), implementation of Council-adopted plans, including the General Plan, S pecific Plans, Bikeway Master Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan, Intelli gent Transportation Syst ems Master Plan, and Vision Zero Implementation Plan, and providin g for various Complete Streets planning and implementation efforts. Current estimated unfunded needs over t he next 20 years ranges from $2.5 billion to $5 billion.

State gas taxes and the local transportation sa les tax are the primary funding sources for transportation network rehabilitation and repair and installation of safety improvements. In 2017, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Ac t of 2017, increased gas tax and vehicle registration fees and indexed the gas tax to inflation. The increased funding has allowed the City to maintain a corridor rehabilitation and improvement program to address the most critical high-volume corridors. Even with increased funding from SB 1, however, the conditions on City streets are projected to continue to decline as the current funding is not enough to offset years of deferred maintenance of City streets. While SB1 indexed the gas tax to inflation, the Governor has proposed to suspend the annual increase scheduled to take effect July 1, 2022, to combat high fuel prices. The Governor has in dicated that the State may consider backfilling the portion of the gas tax that is allocated to local agencies (one-third to one-half of the funding depending on statute). Even if the State does offset the local agency loss for the upcoming fiscal year, if this suspension becomes permanent, it will reduce the spending power for the City in future years by an estimated $1 million annually.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has also increased challenges in maintaining and upgrading transportation infrastructure. The logistics of limiting exposure during construction activities, disruptions in supply chains, inflationary pressures, and workforce issues have resulted in delays and increased costs for construction.

With limited local funding, most capital projects are primarily funded th rough state and federal grants. These grant funds are accessed through competitive programs that require a local match commitment, and the level of local transportation dollars generally guides the City’s ability to 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 2
apply for and secure grant funding, which in turn limits the amount and scope of the capital improvement projects the City can implement.

In 2019, the City declared a climate emergency (Resolution No. 2019-0465) and adopted a goal to be carbon neutral by 2045. Transportation sources contribute 56% of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the city. To reduce this impac t on climate, the City prio ritizes projects that support and promote electrical vehicle adoption, improve opportunities for active transportation and shared transportation/transit, and advance safe and convenient alternatives to travel by single-occupant gas-powered automobiles.

The following describes the Program’s overall goals and sub-programs:

Program Goals
 Provide a safe and comprehensive transportation system that is effectively and efficiently planned, managed, operated, and maintained to the extent possible within funding limitations
 Provide a system that serves all modes of travel for all ages and abilities  Reduce barriers to improve system connecti vity by eliminating gaps, increasing accessibility, prioritizing active modes, connecting to transit stations, and increasing multi- jurisdictional transportation corridors
 Promote equity and public health in transportation investment decisions  Support improvements that result in reduced GHG

The Transportation Program is divided into seven subprograms:
 Active transportation – pedestrian, bikeway, lighting, and streetscape improvements  Bridges – replacement and rehabilitation
 Major transportation improvement s – major roadway construction  Parking – parking facility maintenance and upgrades
 Public rights-of-way accessibility – installati on of improvements to ensure full accessibility  Maintenance – roadway and bikeway rehabilita tion, including integration of complete streets and safety improvements
 Traffic operations and safety – safety impr ovements, Traffic Operat ions Center, traffic calming, active transportation safety, and major streetlight replacement

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 3

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 Transportation Program
by Subprogram Area (in thousands)
$63,588

FY2022/23 Transportation Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$63,588

*See funding chart on next page for more information.

Parking
$755
Bridges
$355
Street
Maintenance
$14,266
Traffic Operations
and Safety
$19,715
Active
Transportation
$27,836
Public Rights of Way
Accessibility (ADA)
$650
Major Transportation
Improvements
$12
General
$90 Gas Tax
$5,096
Major Street
Construction Tax
$1,400
New Measure A
Funds*
$5,052
Road Maintenance
and Rehabilitation
$11,166
Landscaping and
Lighting
$665
Federal Capital
Grants
$31,649
Other Capital
Grants
$5,581
Parking
$755
Other*
$2,135
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 4
FY2022/23 Program Funding

Fund
#1 Fund Name # of
CIPs2 Budget
1001 General Fund 3 90,000
2002 Gas Tax 9 5,095,560
2007 Major Street Construction 2 1,400,000
2008 Street Cut 1 25,125
2012 Transportation System Management 1 14,000
2013 Transportation Development Act (TDA) 2 400,000
2026 New Measure A Maintenance* 3 385,000
2035 Tree Planting & Replacement 1 120,000
2036 Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation 1 11,166,047
2038 New Measure A Traffic Control & Safety 5 1,929,806 2039 New Measure A Streetscape, Bike & Ped 3 2,736,882
2232 Landscaping and Lighting 3 665,000
3206 NNFP Public Facilities Fee 1 11,500
3215 Transportation Dev. Impact Fee 1 1,000,000
3338 Florin Depot Industrial Park 1 564,000
3703 Federal Capital Grants 8 31,649,390
3704 Other Capital Grants 2 5,581,000
6004 Parking 8 754,771
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION $63,588,081

1Funds may be in several program areas and may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

2022-2027 Transportation Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$171,185

General
$450 Gas Tax
$11,778
Major Street
Construction Tax
$7,000 New Measure A
Funds*
$25,258
Road
Maintenance and
Rehabilitation
$55,830
Landscaping and
Lighting
$3,325
Federal Capital
Grants
$53,986
Other Capital
Grants
$5,581
Parking
$3,615
Other*
$4,361
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 5
The ongoing pandemic has impacted certain revenue sources including off-street parking fees.

These revenues have recovered from pandemic lows more quickly than anticipated, but they are still below pre-pandemic levels. Funding for projects which rely on these revenues has increased compared to the FY2021/22 CIP, reflecting modes t recovery from the pandemic. Staff will continue to monitor these revenues and recommend program adjustments for Council consideration should revenue estimates change significantly.

Additional information on fundi ng sources and their restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be found by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The Transportation Program includes a variety of programs and projects, most of which are for road maintenance, are federally funded, or are reserved as future federal match based on past funding awards. With limited lo cal funding available, CIPs hav e leveraged local transportation funding with grant funding to maximize the val ue of every local transportation dollar and the number of improvements the City is able to deliver. The top- funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below.

Transportation Corridor Program (R15200000, $57.5 million) This is an ongoing comprehensive transpor tation corridor rehabili tation program to improve pavement conditions, improve mobili ty options, incorporate or expand active transportation elements, address safety concerns, implement upgraded technology solutions, and provide urban greening elements as needed. The Transportation Corridor Improvements Program is intended to address all needs in a coordinated, efficient, and comprehensive process.

This program takes advantage of opportunities for increased efficiencies and cost savings by integrating complete streets and safety features with pavement resurfacing. For example, road maintenance resurfacing projects (such as road overlay and seals) provide opportunities to implement vehicle lane reductions, add bike lanes, add accessibility improvements, crosswalk treatments, and other complete street features.

The Program is funded with traditional Gas
Tax funds and Road Maintenance and
Rehabilitation Accoun t funds (additional
funding through SB 1). Even using all
increased funding from SB 1, available
funding provides only about one-fifth of the
funding needed to maintain the current
pavement condition index.

Street overlay in progress
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 6
Active Transportation Program (T15180400, $13.2 million) This program is dedicated to programs and infrastructure in the public rights-of-way that support walking and bicycling, that in turn support air quality and responsible climate policy, public health, safety, and mobility choices.

The Active Transportation Program is f unded with Gas Tax funding, New Measure A Safety, Streetscape, Bicycle & Pedestrian funding, and Transportation Development Act funding. This funding is used to support walking and bicycling and can include sidewalk gap closures, new crosswalks, or bicycle detection at traffic signals. It may be also used to match state and federal grants for active transportation projects.

Del Rio Trail (K15165100, $11.4 million)
The proposed 4.8-mile Del Rio Trail Project consists of a Class I bicycle path along the rail corridor of the former Sacramento Southern Railroad’s Walnut Grove Branch Line.

This now abandoned rail line runs sout h through the Land Park, South Land Park, Freeport Manor, Z’Berg, Pocket, and Meadowview neighborhoods between Interstate 5 and Freeport Boulevard. The project will creat e north/south connectivity in the City of Sacramento’s off-street bike network, and increase bike ridership, safety, and equitable investment in bikeway infrastructure.

The inner-city trail will allow south Sacramento
residents, cyclists, pedestrians, runners, and
dog walkers to travel for miles to access William
Land Park, the Sacramento Zoo, schools,
stores, restaurants, reta il centers, jobs, and
community parks. It will create a safe option to
cross busy streets such as Sutterville and
Fruitridge Road. It will also provide a direct link
to other trails within the City of Sacramento’s
Bicycle Master Plan. This project, along with
other projects the City is advancing, is part of
the City’s goal to provide more opportunities for
Sacramento residents to be active and healthy
while also protecting the environment.

The estimated cost of the entire project is approximately $16.5 m illion. The City has secured federal funding for the project assuming contribution of matching local transportation funds.

Broadway Complete Streets (T15175300, $10.9 million)
Broadway is a historic local destination anchored by the Tower Theater and surrounded by shops and restaurants, but the construction of the freeway system cut Broadway and Section of proposed trail corridor
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 7
the Land Park/Curtis Park neighbor hoods off from the rest of the central city and turned the street into a freeway bypass for commuter s. With four lanes of vehicle traffic and no bicycle lanes, biking and walking are unattractive options to access transit, travel to work, and visit local businesses. There are also no eas t-west bike facilities south of T Street, and US-50 acts as a barrier between the central city and residents south of freeway.

The City of Sacramento pr oposes transformative improvements to Broadway, as developed in the Broadway Complete Street planning study. The total project limits extend from 3rd Street to Franklin Boulevar d. The project will in clude lane reductions, a new 29th street to connect X St reet to Broadway at the southbound State Route 99 on- ramp, convert 16th Street between X
Street and Broadway to two-way
traffic, add turn lanes, add buffered
bike lanes in both directions, lighting
enhancements, and intersection
and crosswalk enhancements. The
project will improve traffic efficiency
and turning safety, improve
circulation and relieve commuter
traffic pressure, and improve safety
for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other
alternative modes of transportation.

To date over $11 million in state and f ederal grants have been programmed for the project, with City local funding match with local transportation dollars. The project has received funding through various grants, including federal Active Transportation Program (ATP) and other federal grants, Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Measure A funds, and Major Street Construction Tax funds.

Vision Zero Safety Program (S15184100, $10.7 million)
Transportation safety impacts the comm unity, neighborhoods, and is a public health issue. Crashes are preventable incidents, and no level of injury is acceptable on City streets. Vision Zero is a multi-national transportation safety initiative that aims to eliminate serious injuries and fatalities. With Reso lution No. 2017-0032 in January 2017, the City adopted the goal of zero transportation fataliti es and serious injuries by 2027. In August 2018 with Resolution No. 2018-0342, the City adopted the Vision Zero Action Plan, a comprehensive, collaborative, equitable and data-driven effort to identify high injury locations, behaviors that result in serious in juries and fatalities, and countermeasures to address these issues.

Conceptual design of Broadway improvements
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 8

The Vision Zero Safety Program (S15184100)
coordinates and implements countermeasures identified
in the Vision Zero Action Plan. The program will update City street design standards to reflect best safety and complete street practices, implement safety
improvements on streets on the City’s High Injury
Network, and may help fund required local match for
regional, state, and federal grants for transportation
safety improvements.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

H - 9
FY2022/23 Capital Projects and Programs
Non-site specific or multi-site projects are not shown

Note: Details for the project numbers listed on the map above are provided in alphabetical project order on the following pages.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program K15125000
Construct a bike trail on the south side of the American River between State Road (SR) 160 and H Street, including: 1) preparing a study to evaluate alignment, right-of-way requirements, and construction costs; 2) obtaining easements/permits (from Union Pacific Railroad) and environmental clearance; 3) preparing design and construction documents; and 4) constructing the trail.

Project Description
Construct a bike trail on the south side of the American River between SR160 and H Street.Project Objectives There is currently a gap in the bike trail network on the south side of the American River between SR160 and H Street.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TWO RIVERS TRAIL PHASE IIProject Name
$34,653 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$418,526 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02013 TRANSPORTATION DEV.
$7,901 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$233,378 $10,309 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
$2,264,423 $807,129 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS $0 $0 $3,333,000 $0 $0 $0 $03704 OTHER CAPITAL GRANTS
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$3,333,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $2,958,881 $817,438
$6,291,881Est. Project Cost
$3,333,000
$3,333,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,141,443Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2011
October 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1, 6
Public WorksProject Manager , Adam Randolph
Project Location South Of American River, Between State Route 160 & H Street H - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program K15125200
Install bike parking facilities in the public right-of-way.Project Description Increase the availability of bicycle parking to encourage more bicycle travel.Project Objectives Many locations throughout the City lack adequate bicycle parking.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
BIKE PARKING PROGRAMProject Name
$49,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$180,558 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$205,303 $67,777 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,0002039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
$85,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000Total $520,561 $67,777 $820,561Est. Project Cost
$300,000
$60,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$452,784Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Andrew Hart
Project Location Citywide
H - 11
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program K15165100
Construct a Class I bike trail along the abandoned Sacramento Southern Railroad between Sutterville Road and Meadowview Road.

Project Description
Provide a north/south connection for all ages and abilities in the bikeway network that links South Sacramento, Pocket, South Land Park, and other neighborh oods to the Sacramento River Parkway and William Land Park.

Project Objectives
There is a gap on the bikeway network between Sutterville Road and Meadowview Road.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
DEL RIO TRAILProject Name
$206,611 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$158,295 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02013 TRANSPORTATION DEV.
$153,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$559,061 $80,727 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $03215 TRANSP DEV IMPACT FEE
$2,744,000 $0 $10,359,000 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$11,359,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $3,821,277 $80,727
$15,180,277Est. Project Cost
$11,359,000
$11,359,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,740,550Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
May 2016
June 2025
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5, 7
2, 3
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Adam Randolph
Project Location Rail Corridor Near To Freeport Blvd. & Meadowview Rd.

H - 12
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program K15185000
Provide environmental documentation and easement acquisition necessary for a new multi-use path along the top of the Sacramento River levee from drainage pump station north to Arabella Way.

Project Description
Complete the environmental documentation and obtain the easements necessary to complete the Sacramento River bikeway.

Project Objectives
There is no multi-use trail or public levee access.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
SACRAMENTO RIVER PARKWAY BIKE TRAILProject Name
$330,199 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02401 MEASURE U
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,570,000 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $0 $1,570,000 $0 $0Total $330,199 $0
$1,900,199Est. Project Cost
$1,570,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$330,199Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2017
October 2025
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
7 3
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Megan Johnson
Project Location Sacramento River Bikeway
H - 13
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program K15222100
This project is for citywide maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of existing bike and pedestrian trails including pavement, striping, shoulder repairs, landscape maintenance, and debris and graffiti removal.

Project Description
Provide maintenance of bike and pedestrian trails to ensure safety for users and to protect the City's long- term investment in its trail system. Consistent maintenance of bike and pedestrian trails will reduce the cost of future repairs.

Project Objectives
The bike and pedestrian trail maintenance program is necessary to keep the trail system safe and prevent early deterioration.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE TRAIL REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAMProject Name $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0002013 TRANSPORTATION DEV.

Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000Est. Project Cost
$1,000,000
$200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jose Sanchez
Project Location Citywide
H - 14
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15188500
Use tree replacement in-lieu fees generated from pr ivate development to plant replacement trees citywide.

Project Description
Maintain the quality of the City’s tree canopy.Project Objectives In-lieu fees are collected by the City when a private development project will remove existing trees. The fees must be used to further tree planting and tree replacement. This project provides a mechanism to do so.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TREE PLANTING AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$641,972 $641,972 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,0002035 TREE PLANTING &

REPLACEMENT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000Total $651,972 $651,972 $1,251,972Est. Project Cost
$600,000
$120,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jose Sanchez
Project Location Citywide
H - 15
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15200000
Ongoing program for comprehensive corridor rehabilitation to improve pavement condition, incorporate o r expand active transportation elements, address s afety concerns, implement upgraded technology solutions, and provide urban greening elements as needed.

Project Description
Provide for complete and comprehensive solutions to address issues on transportation corridors, including pavement condition, improve safety, and improve mobility options.

Project Objectives
Currently, needs are addressed independently (e.g., roadway overlays, safety projects, active transportation projects). This would provide for solutions on corridors to address all needs in a coordinated, efficient, and comprehensive process.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR PROGRAMProject Name
$367,816 $367,816 $325,560 $325,560 $325,560 $325,560 $325,5602002 GAS TAX $9,231,770 $9,231,770 $11,166,04 7 $11,166,047 $11,166,047 $11,166,047 $11,166,0472036 ROAD MAINT &

REHABILITATION
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$11,491,607 $11,491,607 $11,491,607 $11,491,607 $11,491,607Total $9,599,586 $9,599,586 $67,057,621Est. Project Cost
$57,458,035
$11,491,607
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 16
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15200800
The Pavement Management Application (PMA) inventory system requires regular updates, as well as other required hardware and software upgrades to keep the City's infrastructure management system current.

Project Description
Update the infrastructure management systems used by Maintenance Services Division.Project Objectives The City is required by the Federal Highway Administration to have a PMA system. An annual allocation is required to update and maintain the PMA system.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT APPLICATION UPDATE PROGRAMProject Name $350,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,0002026 NEW MEASURE A MAINT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $175,000Total $350,000 $175,000 $1,225,000Est. Project Cost
$875,000
$175,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$175,000Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 17
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15212800
Procurement and implementation of a maintenance work management system.Project Description Upgrade the existing work order system to a web-based environment with GIS capabilities.Project Objectives Approximately 10,000 work requests are received annually over the phone, by app, and from the 311 call center that are then forwarded to field crews for completion. Periodic upgrades are needed for the system to meet the demand.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
WORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROGRAM - STREETS AND FACILITIESProject Name $61,453 $3,872 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,0002026 NEW MEASURE A MAINT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000Total $61,453 $3,872 $361,453Est. Project Cost
$300,000
$60,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$57,581Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 18
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15222200
Program provides funding for miscella neous unscheduled maintenance activities on City-owned bridge structures.

Project Description
Repair damage to bridge structures from vehicu lar accidents not reimbursable through risk management and the unforeseen maintenance issues.

Project Objectives
City-owned bridges require periodic maintenance to repair safety issues caused by traffic accidents and/or general wear and tear.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAMProject Name
$75,000 $75,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,0002002 GAS TAX Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000Total $75,000 $75,000 $1,200,000Est. Project Cost
$1,125,000
$225,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 19
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15222300
Program provides funding for miscellan eous, unsc heduled maintenance activities on City-owned floodgates and floodgate structures.

Project Description
Repair damage to floodgate structures from vehicular accidents not reimbursable through risk management and the unforeseen maintenance issues.

Project Objectives
City-owned floodgates require periodic maintenance to repair safety issues caused by traffic accidents and/or general wear and tear.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FLOODGATE MAINTENANCE PROGRAMProject Name
$100,000 $100,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,0002026 NEW MEASURE A MAINT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000Total $100,000 $100,000 $850,000Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 20
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15222500
The trench cut fee program funds the Maintenance Div ision’s “fair share” portion of the utilities cost o f mitigating the pavement damage caused by excavations and is used in conjunction with rehabilitation o f streets where they were collected.

Project Description
Rehabilitate roads that have been damaged by trenching.Project Objectives Trenches impact the life expectancy of roads.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
TRENCH CUT FEE PROGRAMProject Name
$100,125 $100,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,1252008 STREET CUT Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125 $25,125Total $100,125 $100,125 $225,750Est. Project Cost
$125,625
$25,125
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Greg Smith
Project Location Citywide
H - 21
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15235000
Provide pavement maintenance to the roadways that provide access at the Florin Depot Industrial Park.

This includes the following roadways: Unsworth Avenue, Outfall Circle, Younger Creek Drive, a portion o f Florin-Perkins Road, Sky Creek Drive, Blue Sky C ourt, Light Sky Court, and a portion of Elder Creek Road.

Project Description
Review the condition of eligible items and bring roadway items associated with the Florin Road Industrial Park to a state of good or excellent repair.

Project Objectives
In 1987, the City authorized the issuance of bonds through the Florin Depot Industrial Park Assessment District to finance acquisition and construction of public improvements (Resolution No. 1987-0877).

After
all public improvements were completed, remaining funding was directed to be used for maintenance o f those improvements (Resolution No. 1985-0901 and Resolution No. 2017-0113).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
FLORIN DEPOT INDUSTRIAL PARKProject Name
$0 $0 $564,000 $0 $0 $0 $03338 FLORIN DEPOT IND. PARK
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$564,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$564,000Est. Project Cost
$564,000
$564,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
October 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
6 5
Public WorksProject Manager , Megan Johnson
Project Location 8670 Younger Creek Drive And Associated Parcels H - 22
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program R15235100
Replace existing landscaping in the street right-of-way with drought-tolerant landscaping.Project Description Promote water conservation and meet current wate r efficiency standards by reducing water usage fo r landscaping in the street right-of-way.

Project Objectives
The State Water Resources Control Board, under Resolution No. 2017-0024, directed a 25% reduction in water usage for irrigation, which has been met by under watering existing landscaping. The resolution also prohibited the irrigation of ornamental turf in public street medians. The prohibition of irrigating ornamental turf in medians and meeting water effici ency standards requires the and ordered replacement of existing infrastructure with drought-tolerant landscaping by January 1, 2025.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPE REPLACEMENTProject Name
$0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $0 $0
$1,800,000Est. Project Cost
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
June 2025
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jose Sanchez
Project Location Citywide
H - 23
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15101300
This program includes: corridor timing studies and implementation; traffic signal equipment maintenance, upgrade, replacement, and expansion; Traffic Operations Center (TOC) evaluation and expansion studies; related plans, specifications, and estimates; communications conduit infrastructure and maintenance; and Regional Intelligent Transportation System partnership strategic plan studies.

Project Description
Connect traffic signals into the TOC so traffic signal operations and timing can be evaluated, monitored, and managed from the TOC to reduce travel delay and congestion on City streets.

Project Objectives
Approximately half of the 850 traffic signals in the City are tied into the TOC.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS CENTER PROGRAMProject Name
$37,991 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$9,890 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$108,532 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$44,514 $8,729 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,0002038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000 $280,000Total $200,927 $8,729 $1,600,927Est. Project Cost
$1,400,000
$280,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$192,198Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Ryan Billeci
Project Location Citywide
H - 24
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15120500
Provide for active transportation improvements in cluding marked crosswalks, enhancement treatments such as Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) or Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons, bikeway gap closures, and other related improvements.

Project Description
Enhancements for those walking, bicycling, and rolling (active transportation).Project Objectives Safety improvements for active transportation are often requested. Requests are evaluated and enhancements are made where feasible.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PROGRAMProject Name
$1,503,094 $1,503,094 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0002002 GAS TAX $698,606 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$910,378 $667,145 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,0002039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000Total $3,112,078 $2,170,239 $6,112,078Est. Project Cost
$3,000,000
$600,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$941,839Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jennifer Donlon Wyant
Project Location Citywide
H - 25
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15132400
Replacement and repair of the guardrails damaged by traffic collisions or those that have reached the end of their useful life.

Project Description
Maintain the existing guardrails in a state of good repair.Project Objectives Guardrails that are damaged or have reached the end of their useful life require repair or replacement.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
GUARDRAIL REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$227,070 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$223,000 $34,786 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0002038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $450,070 $34,786 $700,070Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$415,284Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Frank Campos Jr.

Project Location Citywide
H - 26
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15132700
Ongoing replacement of signal controllers and light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and the replacement and modification of traffic signals.

Project Description
Replace signal-related equipment that has reached the end of its operational efficiency.Project Objectives Traffic signal equipment that has reached the end of its useful life requires replacement or modification.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE PROGRAMProject Name
$99,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$768,151 $2,911 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$247,248 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$748,250 $314,752 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,0002038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000Total $1,862,934 $317,663 $2,612,934Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,545,271Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Xavier Covarrubias
Project Location Citywide
H - 27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15133400
Relamp street lights and refurbish the paint coating on aluminum streetlight poles.Project Description This program provides a proactive effort to have street lights relamped prior to burn out. The program will also refurbish the coating on aluminum streetlight poles to extend the useful life.

Project Objectives
Street lights burn out and create safety issues for communities. Without a current proactive relamping effort, keeping up with the demand to replace street light outages is challenging. The protective coatings on aluminum streetlight poles are in need of replacement.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
STREET LIGHT RELAMP AND REFURBISHMENT PROGRAMProject Name $866,880 $6,662 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$1,067,965 $304,860 $215,000 $215,000 $215,000 $215,000 $215,0002232 LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$215,000 $215,000 $215,000 $215,000 $215,000Total $1,934,845 $311,52 2 $3,009,845Est. Project Cost
$1,075,000
$215,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,623,323Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Xavier Covarrubias
Project Location Citywide
H - 28
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program S15184100
Support the construction of transportation safety improvements in the public right-of-way and on the High- Injury-Network with the goal of reducing preventable crashes that cause serious injury or death. Includes the design and construction of traffic control devices, pavement markings and striping, median treatments, enhancement of sight distance, traffic c alming, and other transportation safety related improvements.

Project Description
Reduce fatalities and severe injuries related to crashes in Sacramento, and improve public safety and neighborhood livability.

Project Objectives
Streets on the High-Injury-Network have demonstrat ed systemic transportation safety issues and may require safety improvements.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
VISION ZERO SAFETY PROGRAMProject Name
$121,933 $121,933 $720,000 $720,000 $720,000 $720,000 $720,0002002 GAS TAX $100,000 $88,617 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $28,522 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.
$1,846,003 $1,731,031 $1,424,806 $1,424,806 $1,424,806 $1,424,806 $1,424,8062038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,144,806 $2,144,806 $2,144,806 $2,144,806 $2,144,806Total $2,096,458 $1,941,581 $12,820,488Est. Project Cost
$10,724,030
$2,144,806
2022 - 2027 Funding
$154,877Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jennifer Donlon Wyant
Project Location Citywide
H - 29
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15007200
This project is a reserve for grant matching funds. As individual capital projects are approved by Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) or other state or federal funding sources, matching funds will be transferred to projects once they have received authorization to begin.

Project Description
Reserve the matching funds and startup funds needed for state and federal grants for projects.Project Objectives In order to take advantage of state and federal transportation grant opportunities, a local match is typically required.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
STATE AND FEDERAL GRANT MATCH PROGRAMProject Name
$5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$267,862 $267,862 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$9,843,165 $9,843,165 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,0002007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $225,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02036 ROAD MAINT &

REHABILITATION
$503,092 $503,092 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000Total $15,839,119 $15,839,119 $21,839,119Est. Project Cost
$6,000,000
$1,200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jesse Gothan
Project Location Citywide
H - 30
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15008800
Monitor the freeway interchanges serving North Natomas as r equired by the cooperative agreement between the City and the state (City Agreement No. 95-217). Monitor traffic operations at the freeway off- ramps and adjacent intersections.

Project Description
Monitor and identify when the freeway intercha nges begin to be impacted by traffic growth in North Natomas. Results are used to identify when performance thresholds for the intercha nges have been met and what impact mitigation measures are needed. This report is sent directly to Caltrans.

Project Objectives
This monitoring has been performed since 1996. Monitoring was included in the state agreement due to the size of the Natomas expansion and the anticipation that the expansion would take decades to complete. This made it difficult to determine when improvements would be needed that would affect the state highway system.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
NORTH NATOMAS FREEWAY MONITORING PROGRAMProject Name
$171,494 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03201 NN CIF
$99,141 $35,809 $11,50 0 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,5003206 NN FINANCE PLAN (NNFP)

PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500Total $270,635 $35,809 $328,135Est. Project Cost
$57,500
$11,500
2022 - 2027 Funding
$234,826Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
1 10
FinanceProject Manager , Sheri Smith
Project Location Freeway Interchanges Serving North Natomas H - 31
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15036300
Maintain and rehabilitate the pavement, include bike lanes where feasible. Construct new curbs, gutters, and sidewalks to enhance the overall streetscape.

Project Description
Evaluate potential for lane reduction to allow space for standard bike lanes, resurface and rehabilitate pavement, and provide ADA compliant curb ramps.

Project Objectives
Project construction was put on hold pending resolution of redevelopment funding, however an alternate source of construction funds has been secured.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FRUITRIDGE ROAD STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENTSProject Name
$28,226 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$63,807 $63,807 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$443,436 $142,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $180,896 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03701 TAX INCREMENT
$529,000 $360,554 $2,571,000 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS $220,000 $188,956 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03803 2006 ARMY DEPOT TE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,571,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $1,465,365 $755,650
$4,036,365Est. Project Cost
$2,571,000
$2,571,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$709,716Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2003
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
6 5
Public WorksProject Manager , Megan Johnson
Project Location Fruitridge Road From 65th Street To Power Inn Road H - 32
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15087700
Provide facilities that increase the people-moving capac ity of existing transportation systems using TSM measures.

Project Description
Enable the City to develop, build, and/or implement enhancements to the downtown transportation system that will encourage alternate mode use.

Project Objectives
Several facilities that enhance bicycle, walking, transit, and carpooling already exist. This ongoing program will contribute to these facilities or develop new similar facilities.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t

DOWNTOWN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM)

PROGRAM
Project Name
$365,626 $1,058 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $02012 TRANSPORT. SYS. MGT. $6,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02025 NEW MEASURE A CONSTR.

Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $372,438 $1,058
$386,438Est. Project Cost
$14,000
$14,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$371,380Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , Jennifer Donlon Wyant
Project Location Downtown
H - 33
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15100900
This program provides for maintenance and inspection of existing alley closures.Project Description Compliance with City Code 12.40.070, routine maintenance and adequate access to commercial and emergency vehicles.

Project Objectives
Future requests for alley closures/restrictions, if deemed appropriate, will be funded from another source.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
ALLEY ABATEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$395,035 $117,381 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,0001001 GENERAL FUND $651,730 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$1,316 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03004 2006 CIRB TAX-EXEMPT (TE)
$24,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000Total $1,072,920 $117,381 $1,522,920Est. Project Cost
$450,000
$90,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$955,539Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jennifer Johnson
Project Location Citywide
H - 34
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15103200
Ongoing replacement of neighborhood street lightin g components or systems which are unsafe or have reached the end of their useful life.

Project Description
Replace unsafe or deteriorated neighborhood street lights.Project Objectives Many neighborhood street lights are 50-70 years old and have reached the end of their useful life.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name $32,537 $2,823 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,0002232 LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000Total $32,537 $2,823 $2,032,537Est. Project Cost
$2,000,000
$400,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$29,714Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Judith Matsui-Drury
Project Location Citywide
H - 35
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15103300
Ongoing replacement of lighting along major streets which have reached the end of their useful life.Project Description Replace existing street light systems that have reached the end of their useful life.Project Objectives Many older street light systems are in need of replacement.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
MAJOR STREET LIGHTING REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$60 $60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR.
$14,436 $14,436 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0002232 LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$450,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $14,496 $14,496 $664,496Est. Project Cost
$650,000
$450,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Judith Matsui-Drury
Project Location Citywide
H - 36
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15140100
Provide planning, scoping, engineering estimates, and other activities related to capital project grant funding application preparation.

Project Description
Facilitate grant funding opportunities for capital projects.Project Objectives Staff provides capital project planning and scoping, and works with transportation agencies to apply fo r grant funding opportunities and award grant funding to capital projects.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
CAPITAL GRANT PREPARATION PROGRAMProject Name
$1,929,578 $705 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0002002 GAS TAX $50,000 $15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02700 BLOCK GRANT/SHRA
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $1,979,578 $720 $2,979,578Est. Project Cost
$1,000,000
$200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,978,858Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jesse Gothan
Project Location Citywide
H - 37
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15145300
Replace the bridge on Auburn Boulevard at Winding Way over Arcade Creek.Project Description Replace the bridge and provide standard lane and shoulder widths.Project Objectives The bridge has substandard lane widths, shoulders, and sidewalks.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
AUBURN BOULEVARD BRIDGE REPLACEMENTProject Name
$104,649 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$693,681 $149,321 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT $1,435,070 $440,800 $0 $0 $8,170,876 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $0 $8,170,876 $0 $0Total $3,433,400 $1,790,121
$11,604,276Est. Project Cost
$8,170,876
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,643,279Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
May 2014
July 2026
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
2 7
Public WorksProject Manager , Zuhair Amawi
Project Location Auburn Boulevard Over Arcade Creek, Near Winding Way H - 38
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15175300
Improve access for all modes of transit through introduction of a four lane to three lane road diet, new buffered bicycle lane, new marked pedestrian crossings and refuge islands on Broadway from 3rd Street to 29th Street, and multi-modal improvements at two related intersections. The project also proposes to construct a new connection to access State Route 99 between Broadway and X Street at 29th Street.

Project Description
Create a better balance among all modes of travel, where pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and drivers feel safe and accommodated. Improve pedestrian and cyclist safety along and across the corridor, improve amenities throughout the corridor in a manner that creates a unified character for the corridor, and increase opportunities to enjoy business/leisure act ivities. Calm traffic, improve safety, and make the street more inviting for travel on foot and by bicycle.

Project Objectives
The Broadway corridor is an automobile-dominated four lane arterial with sidewalks of varying widths, complicated pedestrian crossings at major intersections, and discontinuous bike lanes.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BROADWAY COMPLETE STREETSProject Name
$82,168 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$835,832 $312,844 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02700 BLOCK GRANT/SHRA
$903,000 $106,862 $5,521,000 $5,382,000 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$5,521,000 $5,382,000 $0 $0 $0Total $2,371,000 $419,706 $13,274,000Est. Project Cost
$10,903,000
$5,521,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,951,294Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2017
October 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Philip Vulliet
Project Location Broadway From 3rd Street To 29th Street H - 39
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15180400
Installation of facilities in the public rights-of-way that promote active transportation needs, implemented according to the goals and standards set in the City’s Master Plans.

Project Description
Promote active modes of transportation that im prove air quality and public health and safety. Make walking, biking, and other active means of transportation safer and attractive.

Project Objectives
Streets targeted in this program lack facilities that encourage active transportation.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $775,000 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$924,292 $684,211 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0002013 TRANSPORTATION DEV. $3,104,275 $3,102,419 $2,276,882 $2,276,882 $2,276,882 $2,276,882 $2,276,8822039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$3,251,882 $2,476,882 $2,476,882 $2,476,882 $2,476,882Total $4,028,567 $3,786,630 $17,187,977Est. Project Cost
$13,159,410
$3,251,882
2022 - 2027 Funding
$241,937Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Jennifer Donlon Wyant
Project Location Citywide
H - 40
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15185800
Replace traffic signal and pedestrian signal hardware, install advanced detection, convert median island traffic signals to mast arm signals.

Project Description
Improve the safety, mobility, and operations along the corridor.Project Objectives Intersections have a collision history and pedestal mounted signals in medians.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
HSIP 8 - FLORIN ROAD SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$15,202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02001 MEASURE A - CONSTR.
$185,523 $88,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $359,500 $46,833 $5,252,900 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$5,252,900 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $560,225 $135,141
$5,813,125Est. Project Cost
$5,252,900
$5,252,900
2022 - 2027 Funding
$425,084Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 2018
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5, 7, 8
3, 4
Public WorksProject Manager , Adam Randolph
Project Location Florin Road, Between Greenhaven Drive & Luther Drive H - 41
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15186100
Construct pedestrian improvements near the Northwood Elementary School and Swanston Light Rail Station. Improvements include the construction of cu rb, gutter, sidewalk, and signal modification and the installation of compliant curb ramps and crosswalks.

Project Description
Improve pedestrian safety and accessibility; enhance neighborhood walkability.Project Objectives Project area lacks curb, gutter, and sidewalk and does not support pedestrian travel.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
NORTHWOOD SCHOOL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTSProject Name
$235,563 $79,730 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $222,531 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02039 NMA SAFETY, STREETSCAPE,

PED, BIC
$350,000 $0 $3,538,000 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$3,538,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $808,094 $79,730
$4,346,094Est. Project Cost
$3,538,000
$3,538,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$728,364Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
August 2018
August 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
2 8
Public WorksProject Manager , Zuhair Amawi
Project Location El Camino Ave, Lexington St. Clay St, And Taft St.

H - 42
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15200600
Upgrading, retrofitting, construction, and/or reconstr uction of curb ramps, crosswalks, audible pedestrian signals, and/or other elements within the public rights-of-way.

Project Description
Bringing the public rights-of-way into compliance with all access laws and regulations.Project Objectives There are locations around the city within the public rights-of-way which need to be upgraded, retrofitted, or constructed to meet current access laws and regulations.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $02002 GAS TAX
$0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0002007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR.

Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$650,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $0 $0 $1,450,000Est. Project Cost
$1,450,000
$650,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Josh Werner
Project Location Citywide
H - 43
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15205100
Implement Pedestrian Improvements within council District 6. The improvements include crossing and lighting.

Project Description
Implementation of crossings and lighting will mitigate safety concerns by improving visibility and slowing down vehicle traffic.

Project Objectives
Limited Pedestrian visibility and crossing areas. In FY2022/23, remaining scope of work will be incorporated into the Traffic Signal Safety Project (T15215000). Additionally, the remaining project balance of $113,788 will be redirected to the Traffic Signal Safety Project (T15215000).

Existing Situation
Improvements resulting from the project will be maintained with transportation funding.Operating Budget Impac
t
PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE CROSSING AND LIGHTINGProject Name $113,788 $113,788 -$113,788 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$113,788 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $113,788 $113,788
$0Est. Project Cost
-$113,788
-$113,788
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2019
July 2022
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
6 5
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Judith Matsui-Drury
Project Location Council District 6
H - 44
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15205300
Construct raised medians, install a traffic signal, and install pedestrian fencing in the medians.Project Description Enhance safety along Valley Hi Drive/La Mancha Way by providing a safe crossing for pedestrians at popular destinations across from bus stops and controlling access into and out of driveways to shopping centers.

Project Objectives
Portions of La Mancha Way lack a center median. The existing center median on Valley Hi Drive has multiple driveway openings into the same shopping centers, and there is a desire for an additional pedestrian crossing there.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
HSIP 9 VALLEY HI DRIVE AND LA MANCHA WAYProject Name
$216,800 $203,417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $258,210 $205,407 $1,277,730 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,277,730 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $475,010 $408,823
$1,752,740Est. Project Cost
$1,277,730
$1,277,730
2022 - 2027 Funding
$66,187Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2020
July 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5, 8
4 Public WorksProject Manager , William Shunk
Project Location Valley Hi Dr/la Mancha Way And Mack Road H - 45
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15205400
Install pedestrian hybrid beacons, construct raised medians, and install pedestrian fencing in the medians.

Project Description
Enhance safety along three segments of Florin Road by providing a safe crossing for pedestrians at popular destinations across from bus stops and controlling access into and out of driveways.

Project Objectives
There are limited signalized crossings for pedestrians on Florin Road.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
HSIP 9 FLORIN ROADProject Name
$197,600 $130,749 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $219,240 $140,323 $1,053,540 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,053,540 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $416,840 $271,072
$1,470,380Est. Project Cost
$1,053,540
$1,053,540
2022 - 2027 Funding
$145,768Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2020
April 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5, 7, 8
3, 4
Public WorksProject Manager , Adam Randolph
Project Location 3 Segments Of Florin Road
H - 46
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15205500
Restripe and realign approaches to the intersection, construct a pedestrian refuge island at an uncontrolled crossing, and install enhanced pedestrian crossings on all legs.

Project Description
The objective is to enhance safety at the intersection by realigning the intersection geometry, improving sight distance, and clarifying turn movements and crossings.

Project Objectives
There is currently a 4-legged intersection with two ways controlled by stop signs. This is an intersection in which the roads do not meet at the typical right angles.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
HSIP 9 LAMPASAS AVENUE AND RIO LINDA BOULEVARDProject Name $206,700 $105,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $180,900 $28,451 $2,076,220 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,076,220 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $387,600 $134,264
$2,463,820Est. Project Cost
$2,076,220
$2,076,220
2022 - 2027 Funding
$253,336Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2020
July 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
2 8
Public WorksProject Manager , William Shunk
Project Location Lampasas Ave & Rio Linda Blvd
H - 47
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15215000
Install signal controls at nine locations within the City.Project Description Enhance mobility and connectivity for all modes of travel including motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

The project will improve access and provide safer crossings for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Project Objectives
These unsignalized locations are on major arterials with high speeds of travel, creating a barrier for safe pedestrian crossings. In FY2022/23, $113,788 will be redirected from the Pedestrian Infrastructure Crossing and Lighting Project (T15205100).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SAFETY PROJECTProject Name
$0 $0 $113,78 8 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$237,000 $195,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $796,000 $792,551 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$113,788 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $1,033,000 $987,972
$1,146,788Est. Project Cost
$113,788
$113,788
2022 - 2027 Funding
$45,028Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2020
June 2024
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
2, 4, 5, 6, 8
1, 4, 5, 8
Public WorksProject Manage
r , William Shunk
Project Location 16th Street At D Street Plus Seven More Locations In Council Districts 2, 4, 5, 6 And 8 H - 48
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15215700
Ongoing management of City's existing Quiet Zones. Work will include staff time, traffic counts, and potential improvements at multiple at-grade crossings.

Project Description
To maintain and re-certify the City's three Quiet Zones, required by federal law on a in 3-5 year basis.Project Objectives Currently no program exists to maintain and re-certify Quiet Zones, as required by federal law.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
CITY RAILWAY QUIET ZONES PROGRAMProject Name
$124,991 $105,722 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,0002038 NMA TRAFFIC CONTROL & SAFETY
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000Total $124,991 $105,722 $249,991Est. Project Cost
$125,000
$25,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$19,269Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Judith Matsui-Drury
Project Location Citywide
H - 49
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15215800
Streetscape improvements on Florin Road from 24th Street to Munson Way that includes bicycle lane gap closures, upgrading existing bike lanes to protected bike lanes, sidewalk improvements, pavement repair, new traffic signals, and additional controlled crossings of Florin Road.

Project Description
Implement the improvements identified for Florin Road in the Vision Zero Top 5 Corridors study.Project Objectives Florin Road within the project limits is comprised of four travel lanes plus a raised median and center turn lane. The posted speed limit is 45 mph with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 36,000 vehicles.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FLORIN ROAD VISION ZERO SAFETYProject Name
$543,000 $501,353 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02036 ROAD MAINT &

REHABILITATION
$0 $0 $0 $0 $4,602,000 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS
$0 $0 $2,248,000 $0 $0 $0 $03704 OTHER CAPITAL GRANTS
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,248,000 $0 $4,602,000 $0 $0Total $543,000 $501,353
$7,393,000Est. Project Cost
$6,850,000
$2,248,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$41,647Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
April 2021
December 2025
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
5, 8
4 Public WorksProject Manager , William Shunk
Project Location Florin Road From 24th Street To Munson Way H - 50
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program T15225100
Upgrade pedestrian crossings at two locations with the installation of a traffic signal at each intersection to allow for a dedicated pedestrian crossing phase and the construction of bulb-outs to shorten crossing distances.

Project Description
Enhance safety by providing safer crossings for pedestrians.Project Objectives The existing intersections are uncontrolled for pedestrian traffic and the length of the crossings are challenging for individuals with limited mobility.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT R STREET & 29TH/30TH STREETSProject Name $121,000 $121,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $02007 MAJOR STREET CONSTR. $314,000 $314,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $03702 CAPITAL REIMBURSEMENT $708,000 $708,000 $0 $0 $2,612,000 $0 $03703 FEDERAL CAP. GRANTS Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $0 $2,612,000 $0 $0Total $1,143,000 $1,143,000
$3,755,000Est. Project Cost
$2,612,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 2022
December 2025
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Cecilyn Foote
Project Location R Street At 29th Street & 30th Street
H - 51
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15110000
Ongoing retail and office space improvements in City-owned facilities that will benefit City-owned parking facilities.

Project Description
Attract quality tenants by maintaining retail and office spaces within City-owned parking facilities which will generate revenues for parking operations.

Project Objectives
The City has over 60,000 square feet of retail/office space in three downtown garages. In many cases these spaces need to be upgraded to attract businesses.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
RETAIL & OFFICE SPACE IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name
$2,061,712 $297,621 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $2,061,712 $297,621 $2,311,712Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,764,091Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 52
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15210000
Ongoing assessment, design, and implementation of preventative and restorative building maintenance.Project Description Repair structural damage to City-owned parking facilities and ensure that the parking garages meet building codes. The project’s aim is to avoid ongoing, long-term structural deterioration.

Project Objectives
Annual assessment of site conditions for restorative or preventative care.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
STRUCTURE REPAIRS & MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROGRAMProject Name $6,754,325 $1,875,933 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000Total $6,754,325 $1,875,933 $8,004,325Est. Project Cost
$1,250,000
$250,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$4,878,392Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 53
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15410000
Renovation/modernization of elevators in City parking garages.Project Description Modernize elevators and provide needed mechanical infrastructure repairs. Meet state elevato r standards.

Project Objectives
City garage elevator mechanical systems need upgrading to a serviceable operational system.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
ELEVATOR RENOVATION/MODERNIZATION PROGRAMProject Name
$2,808,531 $670,600 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000Total $2,808,531 $670,600 $2,933,531Est. Project Cost
$125,000
$25,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,137,931Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 54
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15510000
Plan, design, and paint City-owned parking garages, including ceilings and beams. Install informati onal and directional signage to assist motorists and pedestrians.

Project Description
Assist garage patrons by replacing deficient directional signage for easier and safer navigation within parking facilities and complement lighting, aesthetics, and safety.

Project Objectives
Some parking facilities have paint that has outlasted its useful life as well as outdated and inadequate signage needing to be repainted, refurbished, or replaced.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
PARKING FACILITIES PAINT/SIGNAGE PROGRAMProject Name
$4,400,334 $1,244,680 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $4,400,334 $1,244,680 $4,650,334Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,155,654Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 55
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15520000
Installation of informational and directional si gnage to assist motorists and pedestrians in identifying, entering, exiting, and utilizing City-owned surface parking lots. Add or restore striping and painted markings to lot surfaces for clearly identifiable parking.

Project Description
Provide street/destination orientation graphics for v isitors. Provide lot customers with clearly marked and well-maintained parking facilities.

Project Objectives
New lot striping is needed in some areas while existing striping is faded and obscured by stains, tire marks, and flaking.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
SURFACE PARKING LOT PAINT/SIGNAGE PROGRAMProject Name
$578,827 $380,706 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000Total $578,827 $380,706 $678,827Est. Project Cost
$100,000
$20,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$198,121Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , Matt Eierman
Project Location All City Parking Facilities & Lots
H - 56
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15551900
Ongoing improvements at parking lots in City parks.Project Description Improve functionality and aesthetics of parking lots at City parks, e.g., striping, signage, lighting, landscaping.

Project Objectives
Fifty percent of revenues from Sand Cove Park’s parking lot (Resolution No. 2015-0217) and Mille r Regional Park’s parking lots (Resolution No. 2017-0475) is to fund improvements in City parks parking lots.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
CITY PARKS PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$22,330 $22,330 $39,771 $0 $0 $0 $06004 PARKING
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$39,771 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $22,330 $22,330
$62,101Est. Project Cost
$39,771
$39,771
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 57
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15610000
Purchase and installation of new Revenue Control System for collection of parking revenues at all City- owned parking facilities. This would include the replacement of all computers, software, auditors, ticket dispensers, and card readers systemwide.

Project Description
Improve revenue control capability through use of an updated, automated system with the goal o f
improving customer service.

Project Objectives
Customer service and revenue control would be improved if a new Parking Access and Revenue Control System (PARCS) were installed.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
REVENUE CONTROL SYSTEM PROGRAMProject Name
$5,071,402 $1,045,182 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $120,000Total $5,071,402 $1,045,182 $5,671,402Est. Project Cost
$600,000
$120,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$4,026,220Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , Matt Eierman
Project Location Citywide
H - 58
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program V15710000
Ongoing planning and development of new City parking facilities.Project Description Provide resources for anticipated future parking demands.Project Objectives Currently, new parking facilities are financed through available cash, debt financing, or other borrowing.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
PARKING FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$204,942 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$6,665,031 $5,937,665 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0006004 PARKING Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $6,869,973 $5,937,665 $7,869,973Est. Project Cost
$1,000,000
$200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$932,308Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , Matt Eierman
Project Location Downtown City Parking Facilities
H - 59
6(&7,21±,
City 8WLOLWLHV
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

I - 1

INTRODUCTION
The City Utilities Capital Improvement Program (Program) reflects the City’s funding strategy for delivering capital improvements to provide and maintain services and facilities for the benefit of the community, safeguarding public health and sa fety, promoting sustainability, enhancing livability, and expanding economic development throughout the City.

To ensure long-term infrastructure sustainabi lity, this Program utilizes an asset management process to systematically prioritize and rank its rehabilitation and replacement needs based on information collected through various elements such as criticality, condition assessment, master planning, and maintenance history.

This Program is consistent with the 2035 General Plan.

Program Goals
 Comply with all government regulations and legal requirements  Provide high-quality, safe, and reliable utility systems by delivering services through proactively monitoring and maintaining our assets and reducing system vulnerability  Plan for current and future generations by protecting, preserving, and enhancing resources, the environment, and the community
 Manage funding by finding alternative funding sour ces, such as grants or other revenues  Provide for environmentally sound landfill closure

Ranking Criteria
 Replaces failed infrastructure
 Is mandated by state and f ederal laws or regulations  Protects the public by meeti ng health and safety requirements  Meets the demands of increased growth
 Improves or reduce ongoing facilit y operations and maintenance costs

The City Utilities Program is divided into four subprograms:
 Recycling and Solid Waste
 Storm Drainage
 Wastewater
 Water

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

I - 2

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES

FY2022/23 City Utilities Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$31,992

2022-2027 City Utilities Program
by Fund (in thousands)
$158,929

Water Development
Impact Fees
$3,000
Water
$25,741
Wastewater
$2,153
Solid Waste
$848
Storm Drainage
$250
Water Development
Impact Fees
$11,900
Water
$126,162
Wastewater
$12,243
Solid Waste
$7,008
Storm Drainage
$1,616
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

I - 3
FY2022/23 Program Funding
Fund #1 Fund Name # of CIPs2 Budget
6001 Water Development Impact Fees 1 3,000,000
6005 Water 19 25,741,000
6006 Wastewater 8 2,153,000
6007 Solid Waste 6 848,000
6011 Storm Drainage 1 250,000
TOTAL CITY UTILITIES $31,992,000
1Funds may be in several program areas and may be found in the other sections of this document. 2Projects may have multiple funding sources.

Additional information on funding sources and thei r restrictions may be found in Description of Major Funding Sources (Section J). All projects receiving funding may be found by referring to Index K. Total funding for a project may be f ound by reviewing the detail sheets after this summary or by referring to Index N.

MAJOR PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
The City Utilities Program includes a variety of projects and programs. The top-funded CIPs during the five-year period are listed below by subprogram.

Water Impact Fees
Water+ Program (Z14190100, $11.9 million)
The Program will design plans and specifications for the development of necessary water supply expansion improvements needed due to expected growth. The program is necessary to ensure the City has sufficient wa ter treatment capacity for the future water demands of the City of Sacramento. Long range water demand projections, based on General Plan projections, have identified shortage of water treatment capacity around 2035. These efforts will be funded by rev enues generated from im pact fees paid by developers whose projects add to the water supply demands.

Water
Well Rehabilitation Program (Z14110100, $28.1 million)
The Program will build replacement groundw ater wells as recommended by DOU’s completed 2017 Groundwater Master Plan. Many of the City’s groundwater wells were built in the 1950s and are near the end of thei r useful lives. Replacement capacity is needed to sustain the City’s groundwater program and comply with the General Plan Policy U 2.1.2, which requires the City to maintain a surface water and groundwater conjunctive use program. The Program will focus on planning efforts to support the design of replacement wells, environmental docum entation preparation, and the design and construction of new and/or replacement well sites.
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

I - 4
Wastewater
Combined Collection System Rehabilitation and Replacement Program (X14170100, $3.2 million)
The City's Combined Sewer System (CSS) is served by undersized and aging collection pipes that range from six inches to 120 inches pipe diameter, two primary CSS treatment plants, and by two large pump stations, Sumps 1 and 2. The City’s operation of the CSS is governed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board through a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit containing a Long-Term Control Plan that guides improvement and rehabilitation projects to m eet the CSS long term goals.

Replacing worn, failed, or undersized C SS pipes, primary treatment plants and pump stations complies with these goals. Assets are prioritized for replacement based on condition and critical function.

Recycling and Solid Waste
28th Street Landfill Regulatory Compliance Upgrades (Y15000100, $4.5 million) This project ensures that waste buried at the 28th Street landfill does not come in contact with groundwater or otherwise compromise water quality. To ensure this and in response to a Corrective Action Order from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this project will enhance methane gas extraction capabilities by expanding the gas collection system and increase the separation of buried waste to groundwater.

2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

I - 5
FY2022/23 Capital Projects and Programs
Non-site specific or multi-site projects are not shown

Note: Details for the project numbers listed on the map above are provided in alphabetical project order on the following pages.

City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program W14000200
Reserve for unforeseen capital program needs.Project Description Facilitate the completion of capital projects by reserving appropriations for minor overruns and provide a source of funds for small projects that could not be anticipated before the start of the fiscal year.

Project Objectives
It is prudent to maintain a capital program reserve, renewed annually as needed, as a source of funding should the need arise to provide additional funding for an existing project due to previously unforeseen conditions.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BASE CIP CONTINGENCY DRAINAGE PROGRAMProject Name
$999,373 $984,690 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,0006011 STORM DRAINAGE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000Total $999,373 $984,690 $2,249,373Est. Project Cost
$1,250,000
$250,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$14,684Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Brett Grant
Project Location Citywide
I - 6
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14000500
Reserve for unforeseen capital program needs.Project Description Facilitate the completion of capital projects by reserving appropriations for minor overruns and provide a source of funds for small projects that could not be anticipated before the start of the fiscal year.

Project Objectives
It is prudent to maintain a capital program reserve, renewed annually as needed, as a source of funding should the need arise to provide additional funding for an existing project due to previously unforeseen conditions.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BASE CIP CONTINGENCY WASTEWATER PROGRAMProject Name
$14,085 $14,085 $180,000 $105,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,0006006 WASTEWATER $610 $610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$180,000 $105,000 $155,000 $155,000 $155,000Total $14,695 $14,695 $764,695Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$180,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 1991Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 7
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14130400
This project calibrates existing flow meters at wastewater sumps citywide for precision and provides fo r constructing flow meters at unmetered sumps.

Project Description
Protect public health and safety by reducing wastewater overflows by ensuring reliable function of the wastewater system.

Project Objectives
Many of the City's sewer pump stations do not have flow meters so sewer flows are estimated by pump run time. As a result, inefficient pump operation is difficult to detect and can lead to system surcharge and sewer outflows.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
WASTEWATER FLOW METERING PROGRAMProject Name
$733,055 $641,668 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $0 $06006 WASTEWATER $107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $300,000 $600,000 $0 $0Total $733,162 $641,668
$1,633,162Est. Project Cost
$900,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$91,494Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2014Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 8
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14130900
Repairing and/or replacing capital assets at the wastewater pump stations.Project Description Protect public health and safety by reducing wastewater overflows by ensuring reliable function of the wastewater system.

Project Objectives
Wastewater pumping facilities degrade over time, requiring capital replacements.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
WASTEWATER SUMP REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name $168,614 $168,614 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,0006006 WASTEWATER $449 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06320 WASTEWATER RB 2013
$86,104 $25,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000Total $255,167 $194,026 $1,005,167Est. Project Cost
$750,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$61,141Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 9
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14131200
This project funds rehabilitation and improvements of capital assets at the Combined Water Treatmen t Plant (CWTP).

Project Description
Improve reliability and reduce wastewater overflows to the river. Reduce surcharging of combined wastewater to City streets and properties during storms and comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Project Objectives
The program is a major operational component for the co mbined wastewater system. Plant performance is continually monitored to seek efficiencies through asset repair and improvements.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact

COMBINED WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION/REPAI R

PROGRAM
Project Name
$21,536 $21,536 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,0006006 WASTEWATER $51 $51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000Total $21,587 $21,587
$321,587Est. Project Cost
$300,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
7 UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location 1395 35th Avenue
I - 10
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14131500
Replace electrical equipment at various City facilities in the wastewater and Combined Sewer System (CSS).

Project Description
Protect public health and safety by improving the reliability of these facilities.Project Objectives Existing electrical equipment is deteriorated and antiquated, making repair difficult due to the lack o f available parts. Failure of this equipment can result in wastewater backing up into streets and properties.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
FACILITY ELECTRICAL REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name
$435,351 $434,758 $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $100,0006006 WASTEWATER $70,000 $65,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $100,000Total $505,351 $499,758 $1,505,351Est. Project Cost
$1,000,000
$400,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$5,593Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Paul Barnes
Project Location Citywide
I - 11
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14131600
This program funds improvements, rehabilitation, and replacement of generators.Project Description Comply with energy efficiency and air quality regulations.Project Objectives City facilities need to upgrade or improve deficient facilities.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
GENERATOR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMProject Name
$150,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,0006006 WASTEWATER $399,544 $41,615 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
$216,677 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000Total $766,221 $141,615 $1,266,221Est. Project Cost
$500,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$624,606Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 12
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14160500
Repair or replace pipe infrastructure within the separated sewer collection system using various techniques such as lining, bursting, and dig and replace.

Project Description
Protect public health and safety by reducing wastewater overflows by ensuring reliable function of the wastewater system.

Project Objectives
Various wastewater mains have failed causing excessive maintenance and impaired service, including wastewater overflows.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
SEPARATED PIPE REHABILITATION AND REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name $0 $0 $1,003,000 $0 $700,000 $400,000 $400,0006006 WASTEWATER $8,775 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,003,000 $0 $700,000 $400,000 $400,000Total $8,775 $0 $2,511,775Est. Project Cost
$2,503,000
$1,003,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$8,775Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 13
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14170100
Repair/rehabilitate the Combined Collection System (CCS) storm drains, leads, manholes, services, mainline pipes, and other collection elements by trenchless and traditional replacement methods.

Project Description
Protect public health and safety, through maintenance of the CCS including drain inlets, leads, manholes, services, and mainline pipes through trenchless or traditional replacement means.

Project Objectives
The CCS is comprised of various elements that in time become old, deteriorated, and difficult to repai r
and/or maintain.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact

COMBINED COLLECTION SYSTEM REHABILITATION AND

REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
Project Name
$1,090,362 $1,067,676 $150,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,0006006 WASTEWATER $186,590 $914 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$150,000 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Total $1,276,952 $1,068,590 $4,426,952Est. Project Cost
$3,150,000
$150,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$208,362Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 2017Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Citywide
I - 14
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program X14170500
Combined Sewer system (CSS) pumping, storage, and treatment facilities need maintenance and improvements to stay in compliance with operational and regulatory requirements.

Project Description
Protect public health and safety, minimize flooding and outflows, and comply with regulatory requirements through improvements and repairs to the CSS pumping, storage, and treatment facilities.

Project Objectives
Pump, storage, and treatment facilities are critical to the operations of the CSS. Proper maintenance o f
these assets is critical for compliance with NPDES permit and level of service goals.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
CSS SUMP/TREATMENT FACILITIES PROGRAMProject Name
$571,220 $571,220 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $06006 WASTEWATER
$52,212 $50,836 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
$36,391 $36,391 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06321 WASTEWATER RB 2019
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0Total $659,823 $658,447
$809,823Est. Project Cost
$150,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,376Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 2017Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
3, 4, 5, 6
UtilitiesProject Manager , Nina Buelna
Project Location Combined Sewer System
I - 15
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y13000200
Closure of the landfill site located directly west of the 28th Street Landfill and south of the Dellar Landfill.Project Description Conduct a comprehensive clean up and abatement effort to correct the waste encroachment and eliminate potential liability from the nearby private p roperty owners. Complete closure plan, grade site to drain, and commence post-closure monitoring.

Project Objectives
A recent survey of the Cannon-Scollan Landfill revealed that waste encroached property lines to the south and west and has affected several private property parcels.

Existing Situation
Returning a portion of budget back to the Recycling and Solid Waste available fund balance.Operating Budget Impact
CANNON-SCOLLAN LANDFILL CLOSURE PROGRAMProject Name
$900,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01001 GENERAL FUND
$5,200,000 $4,632,087 -$900,000 $0 $0 $0 $06007 SOLID WASTE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
-$900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $6,100,000 $5,532,087
$5,200,000Est. Project Cost
-$900,000
-$900,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$567,913Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2015Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , John Febbo
Project Location 2401 A Street
I - 16
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y14000100
California law requires that funding be set aside each year to ensure that there will be sufficient resources to cover future closure activities.

Project Description
Keep the closed City landfill in compliance with the approved final closure/post-closure plan.Project Objectives Landfill closure has been completed; however, as part of the annual 30-year post-closure care, annual funds must be provided for post-closure maintenance.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
LANDFILL SITE CLOSURE PROGRAMProject Name
$5,180,304 $2,340,072 $300,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,0006007 SOLID WASTE $5,195,273 $104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06008 LANDFILL CLOSURE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$300,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000Total $10,375,577 $2,340,176 $11,975,577Est. Project Cost
$1,600,000
$300,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$8,035,401Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 1994Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , John Febbo
Project Location 20 28th Street
I - 17
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y14000400
State-mandated financial obligations for the landfill 's groundwater corrective action program require owners of solid waste facilities to establish financial assurance to cover any reasonably foreseeable release into the groundwater.

Project Description
Satisfy state-mandated financial assurance requirements for California Health and Safety Code Title 23, Articles 5 and 10. Control/mitigate groundwater contamination beneath the City’s landfill.

Project Objectives
The existing landfill has affected the shallow groundwater aquifer directly under the site. Documented releases were described in the June 1987 Solid Waste Assessment Test Report.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PROGRAMProject Name
$552,875 $305,001 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,0006007 SOLID WASTE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000 $23,000Total $552,875 $305,001 $667,875Est. Project Cost
$115,000
$23,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$247,874Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
January 1994Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manage
r , John Febbo
Project Location 20 28th Street
I - 18
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y15000100
Comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), approved closure/post-closure plan, corrective actions for the RWQCB's clean up and abatement order, and new requirements from the Sacramento County Environmental Management Department.

Project Description
Enhance methane gas extraction capabilities by expanding the gas collection facilities, installing a new, high-efficiency flare, and allowing for future expansion into adjacent legacy landfills as necessary pending future regulatory requirements.

Project Objectives
Review indicated that groundwater beneath the 28th Street landfill and adjacent properties may, on occasion, come within five feet of waste, but only during very high stages of flow in the American Rive r
(less than 10% of the time).

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
28TH STREET LANDFILL REGULATORY COMPLIANCE UPGRADES

PROGRAM
Project Name
$7,975,000 $5,759,761 $1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,0006007 SOLID WASTE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,250,000 $1,000,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000Total $7,975,000 $5,759,761 $12,475,000Est. Project Cost
$4,500,000
$1,250,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,215,239Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2017Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , John Febbo
Project Location 20 28th Street
I - 19
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y15000300
Closure of landfill site located directly west of the 28th Street Landfill and Sutter’s Landing Corporation Yard.

Project Description
To comply with the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) requirements to further investigate the nature and extent of waste in the landfilled areas of Bell Marine, followed by a complete closure plan, grade site to drain, and commence post-closure monitoring.

Project Objectives
The exact mitigation required is still to be determined. The City, however, is responsible for 75% of the closure costs, as defined in Settlement Agreement 2019-0240 with Bell Marine Company.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BELL MARINE LANDFILL CLOSURE PROGRAMProject Name
$325,000 $209,811 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $06007 SOLID WASTE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $325,000 $209,811
$400,000Est. Project Cost
$75,000
$75,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$115,189Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
4 1
Public WorksProject Manager , John Febbo
Project Location 200 28th Street
I - 20
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Y15000400
The purpose of this program is to use recent technology advances to increase efficiency and productivity.Project Description To implement fleet reporting and routing analytics and Fleet Business Intelligence tools to monito r equipment use and performance.

Project Objectives
Funds are needed to use recent technology advances to increase efficiency and productivity.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
RSW FLEET MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMProject Name
$0 $0 $100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006007 SOLID WASTE Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000Total $0 $0
$300,000Est. Project Cost
$300,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2022
June 2027
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
All
All
Public WorksProject Manager , John Febbo
Project Location Citywide
I - 21
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14000700
Reserve for unforeseen capital program needs.Project Description Facilitate the completion of capital projects by reserving appropriations for minor overruns and provide a source of funds for small projects that could not be anticipated before the start of the fiscal year.

Project Objectives
It is prudent to maintain a capital program reserve, renewed annually as needed, as a source of funding should the need arise to provide additional funding for an existing project due to previously unforeseen conditions.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
BASE CIP CONTINGENCY WATER PROGRAMProject Name
$38,752 $38,752 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06001 WATER IMPACT FEE
$749,444 $749,144 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,0006005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000Total $788,196 $787,896 $5,788,196Est. Project Cost
$5,000,000
$1,000,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$301Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 1995Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Michelle Carrey
Project Location Citywide
I - 22
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14000800
Annually test backflow devices for city departments requiring backflow testing and repairs and issue a permit, or “tag” to show compliance of the State requirement.

Project Description
To ensure compliance with the City's Cross-Connection Control Program, the Department of Utilities annually tests backflow devices to ensure that backflow prevention assemblies are working properly.

Project Objectives
The Department of Utilities purchases weatherproof inspection tags from the County for placement on a backflow assembly device that successfully passes testing.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE PROGRAMProject Name
$2,346,916 $33,276 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $100,000 $25,0006005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$25,000 $0 $25,000 $100,000 $25,000Total $2,346,916 $33,276 $2,521,916Est. Project Cost
$175,000
$25,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,313,640Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Jon Conover
Project Location Citywide
I - 23
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14001500
Provide for drinking water regulatory efforts that encompass water production through the water treatment plants, wells, and reservoirs; and distribute this water to ratepayers.

Project Description
Comply with drinking water regulatory requirements of the California Surface Water Treatment Rule, and California Code of Regulations Title 22.

Project Objectives
The City conducts special studies and testing to ensure protection of water quality including required monitoring, tracking upcoming regulations, perfo rming research related to water quality changes, and collecting information on special topics.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
DRINKING WATER QUALITY PROGRAMProject Name
$4,188,455 $2,329,613 $300,000 $200,000 $300,000 $300,000 $275,0006005 WATER $100,000 $1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$300,000 $200,000 $300,000 $300,000 $275,000Total $4,288,455 $2,329,614 $5,663,455Est. Project Cost
$1,375,000
$300,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,958,841Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager ,M a r k S e v e r e i d
Project Location Citywide
I - 24
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14001900
Reduce energy usage by upgrading to more energy efficient lighting and equipment, and modifying operations in the Water, Wastewater, and Drainage systems while maintaining the expected levels o f service.

Project Description
Proactive effort to reduce energy usage and costs by actively engaging and participating in energy efficiency and conservation measures and programs.

Project Objectives
The Department of Utilities’ updated energy management plan has identified areas of improving equipment and operational efficiencies.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
UTILITY ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMProject Name
$322,441 $274,754 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
$457,284 $410,786 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,0006006 WASTEWATER $80,604 $32,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000Total $860,329 $718,085 $1,660,329Est. Project Cost
$800,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$142,244Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
June 2010Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Paul Barnes
Project Location Citywide
I - 25
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14003600
This program funds the maintenance and improvements of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system as defined in the SCADA master plan.

Project Description
Provide improvements and maintenance of the SCADA system that have been deemed essential and critical and are used by Operations to remotely control and monitor the facilities and equipment for the Water, Wastewater, and Storm Drainage infrastructure per the SCADA master plan.

Project Objectives
The SCADA master plan has identified vulnerabilities with the City’s system, which include cybersecurity, outdated core network configuration, and non-supported controllers which cannot be updated.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - SCADA PROGRAMProject Name
$2,784,800 $2,784,800 $1,450,000 $700,000 $1,607,510 $6,236,450 $7,198,0306005 WATER $138,303 $138,303 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,0006006 WASTEWATER $572,243 $572,243 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06320 WASTEWATER RB 2013
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,550,000 $800,000 $1,707,510 $6,336,450 $7,298,030Total $3,495,346 $3,495,346 $21,187,336Est. Project Cost
$17,691,990
$1,550,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
September 2005Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Charley Cunningham
Project Location Citywide
I - 26
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14005400
Design and construct a four million gallon (4MG) water storage reservoir, booster pump station, and two groundwater wells.

Project Description
Provide water to the southern portion of the City during peak hour demands, fire demands, and emergencies.

Project Objectives
As South Sacramento develops and new wholesale customers within the City’s “place of use” are supplied with City water, additional storage and water supply are needed.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
SHASTA PARK RESERVOIR AND PUMP STATION PROJECTProject Name $4,366,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06001 WATER IMPACT FEE
$1,850,000 $1,850,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $6,216,918 $1,850,000
$6,466,918Est. Project Cost
$250,000
$250,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$4,366,918Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
February 2016
December 2023
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
Council District
Plan Area
8 UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location 8380 Kastanis Way
I - 27
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14006800
Correct and repair unexpected critical failures with the City’s water infrastructure.Project Description Enable repairs needed to continue operating efficiently.Project Objectives Due to the size and age of the City’s infrastructure, unplanned failures occur. In order to have funding to make the necessary repairs, this program provides funding to respond to those events.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
UNPLANNED CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE WATER PROGRAMProject Name $879,358 $589,375 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,0006005 WATER $15,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000Total $894,718 $589,375 $2,894,718Est. Project Cost
$2,000,000
$500,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$305,343Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Michelle Carrey
Project Location Citywide
I - 28
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14009400
Replace valves and fire hydrants in the water distribution system that have failed or are obsolete.Project Description Replace valves and fire hydrants to facilitate positive system shutdowns and improve the system’s reliability and safety.

Project Objectives
Failed valves and obsolete fire hydrants are replaced when encountered.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE REPLACEMENT PROGRAMProject Name $2,289,595 $301,438 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $300,000 $06005 WATER $541,231 $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $300,000 $0Total $2,830,826 $301,443 $3,880,826Est. Project Cost
$1,050,000
$250,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$2,529,383Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2008Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Jon Conover
Project Location Citywide
I - 29
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14010000
Install water meters at residential homes that do not currently have meters. Assembly Bill (AB) 2572 requires water meters be installed on existing water service connections by 2025.

Project Description
Comply with AB 2572, promote conservation, and bill customers for the amount of water they use. The goal is to complete all meter installations by the end of FY2021/22.

Project Objectives
Meters are installed at 100% of all customers’ locations, and program close out items are underway.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
RESIDENTIAL WATER METER PROGRAMProject Name
$1,063,001 $30,337 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
$690,396 $504,034 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06205 WATER GRANT

REIMBURSEMENT (RMB)
$75,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
$24,566,702 $24,566,702 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06312 DRINKING WATER SRF LOAN Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $26,395,579 $25,101,073
$26,495,579Est. Project Cost
$100,000
$100,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$1,294,506Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
June 2009Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Marc Lee
Project Location Citywide
I - 30
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14110100
Rehabilitate and replace dilapidated infrastructure at the City potable groundwater facilities.Project Description Improve City’s water supply reliability and groundwater extraction capability. A reliable groundwate r supply will optimize conjunctive management of the City’s water supply and will allow the City to participate in future drought banking programs and water transfers.

Project Objectives
Most groundwater wells in the City were constructed in the 1950s, and require extensive rehabilitation o r repairs on the mechanical equipment, electrical switchgear, and well casings. Failing wells require replacement wells to be constructed and the existing wells to be abandoned.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
WELL REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name
$472,465 $437,329 $4,636,000 $6,874,000 $6,480,000 $3,620,000 $6,500,0006005 WATER $65,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06205 WATER GRANT

REIMBURSEMENT (RMB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$4,636,000 $6,874,000 $6,480,000 $3,620,000 $6,500,000Total $537,508 $437,329 $28,647,508Est. Project Cost
$28,110,000
$4,636,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$100,179Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
June 2010Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location Citywide
I - 31
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14120300
Implement a sedimentation removal system at the S acramento River Water Treatment Plant (SRWTP) intake.

Project Description
Prevent sedimentation buildup around the low lift pumps in SRWTP intake facility.Project Objectives Sedimentation builds up around the intake pumps creating inefficient operations of the pumps and additional wear on the impellers.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
SRWTP INTAKE SEDIMENTATION REMOVAL PROGRAMProject Name
$283,314 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Total $283,314 $0
$483,314Est. Project Cost
$200,000
$200,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$283,314Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2014Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location Citywide
I - 32
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14130100
Design and construct various improvements at Florin Pump Station including air quality, improved communications, flow meter replacement, pump r edundancy, programming improvements, and improved safety and reliability of station.

Project Description
Complete necessary improvements for reliability of pump station and redundancy needs for maintenance, including needed safety upgrades.

Project Objectives
The existing natural gas engines fail and are taken out of service for maintenance on a regular basis.

There is insufficient booster pumping capacity to maintain system pressure in the water system when an engine is taken out of service.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
FLORIN RESERVOIR BACKUP ENGINE PROGRAMProject Name
$3,828,056 $264,353 $750,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $06005 WATER $107,733 $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$750,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0Total $3,935,789 $264,358
$5,685,789Est. Project Cost
$1,750,000
$750,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$3,671,431Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
6 UtilitiesProject Manager , Steven Swain
Project Location 6920 Power Inn Rd.

I - 33
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14130200
Rehabilitate the E.A. Fairbairn Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) structures constructed in 1964, including flocculation/sedimentation basin, filters, high lift pump station, and replacement of filter media.

Project Description
Make available to the City a reliable 100-120 million gallons per day of water treatment capacity at the E.

A. Fairbairn Water Treatment Plant.

Project Objectives
In 2009, Carollo Engineering prepared a study that eval uated the condition of the City’s water treatment facilities that identified extensive concrete spalling and cracking in critical treatme nt process structures at the FWTP that should be rehabilitated.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impact
FAIRBAIRN WATER TREATMENT PLANT REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name $4,666,500 $4,464,11 5 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $700,000 $1,500,000 $06005 WATER $416,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$4,000,000 $5,000,000 $700,000 $1,500,000 $0Total $5,082,501 $4,464,11 5 $16,282,501Est. Project Cost
$11,200,000
$4,000,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$618,386Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2012Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location Citywide
I - 34
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14130300
Replace existing water transmission mains (pipes larger than twelve-inch diameter) that have significant maintenance issues with new reliable mains that meet City standards.

Project Description
Ensure the reliability of the water distribution system and reduce potential damage from transmission main breaks.

Project Objectives
This pipeline replacement program replaces water transmission mains that have exceeded their useful lives. Older mains typically require additional maintenance, reduce system reliability, and no longer meet City standards.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
TRANSMISSION MAIN REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name
$9,358,560 $9,345,918 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 $06005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 $0Total $9,358,560 $9,345,918 $11,358,560Est. Project Cost
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$12,642Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2014Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Michelle Carrey
Project Location Citywide
I - 35
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14130400
Replace water distribution mains (pipes twelve-inch in diameter or smaller) that have maintenance issues or have exceeded their useful life.

Project Description
Improve water distribution system reliability including increased pressures and fire suppression capabilities.

Project Objectives
Many miles of cast iron mains within the downtown and midtown areas are tuberculated and do not meet flow standards.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
DISTRIBUTION MAIN REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name
$2,423,563 $2,423,563 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $500,000 $7,337,970 $7,500,0006005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$4,000,000 $4,000,000 $500,000 $7,337,970 $7,500,000Total $2,423,563 $2,423,563 $25,761,533Est. Project Cost
$23,337,970
$4,000,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$0Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2014Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Michelle Carrey
Project Location Citywide
I - 36
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14130500
Rehabilitation work at water reservoirs, including booster pump stations, which may include patching interior and exterior coatings, improvements to cathodic protection systems, pump and moto r improvements, electrical upgrades, structural repairs, etc.

Project Description
Improve the water system reliability and extend useful lives of the City’s reservoirs.Project Objectives Reservoirs range in age from several years old to just under one hundred years old, and the booste r pump stations range in age from several years old to just over fifty years old. These assets require upgrades and modifications to comply with regulatory requirements.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
RESERVOIR REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name
$3,533,445 $3,480,845 $1,400,000 $2,100,000 $500,000 $750,000 $500,0006005 WATER $2,367 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06310 WATER REV. BONDS (RB)
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$1,400,000 $2,100,000 $500,000 $750,000 $500,000Total $3,535,812 $3,480,845 $8,785,812Est. Project Cost
$5,250,000
$1,400,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$54,967Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2014Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location Citywide
I - 37
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14140100
Provide security improvements to key Water, Drainage, and Wastewater facilities as recomme nded in the DOU Security Master Plan.

Project Description
Implement the Department of Utilities’ Security Master Plan recommendations, as accepted by City Council in September 2014.

Project Objectives
A security evaluation was completed by consultants in 2013 that provided a comprehensive road map to bring the Department of Utilities’ security up to best management practices, including recommendations for fixing potential security vulnerabilities.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
SECURITY AND EMERGENCY PREPARATION PROGRAMProject Name
$841,176 $793,300 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 $275,000 $300,0006005 WATER $192,973 $192,256 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,0006006 WASTEWATER $4,753 $4,753 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$345,000 $345,000 $345,000 $345,000 $370,000Total $1,038,902 $990,309 $2,788,902Est. Project Cost
$1,750,000
$345,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$48,593Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2013Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Lisa Deklinski
Project Location Citywide
I - 38
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14140600
This program provides funding for capital improvements to Department of Utilities facilities including space planning and rehabilitation projects.

Project Description
Improve the existing condition of Department of Utilities facilities through maintenance and/o r replacement projects for continued occupancy of Department of Utilities sites.

Project Objectives
As projects are identified, they will be completed and funded through this program.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impact
DOU FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS AND REHABILITATION PROGRAMProject Name $628,282 $614,128 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006005 WATER $391,583 $380,152 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0006006 WASTEWATER $150,507 $128,756 $0 $0 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$50,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000Total $1,170,372 $1,123,036 $1,620,372Est. Project Cost
$450,000
$50,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$47,336Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
March 2016Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , David Levine
Project Location Citywide
I - 39
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14170100
Planning and implementation of IT initiatives as well as coordination and management of IT resources and oversight on all identified IT programs, software, hardware upgrades, and consulting services.

Project Description
Support initiatives through technology advancements by providing reliable systems that improves customer service and staff with tools to be more efficient and make decisions that promotes the Department’s vision.

Project Objectives
Projects need an overall strategy or to maximize the available resources.Existing Situation None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES’ IT PROGRAMProject Name
$276 $276 $0 $366,000 $0 $0 $06005 WATER
$15,053 $1,428 $0 $390,400 $0 $0 $06006 WASTEWATER
$0 $0 $0 $1,317,600 $0 $0 $06007 SOLID WASTE
$390 $390 $0 $366,000 $0 $0 $06011 STORM DRAINAGE
Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$0 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $0Total $15,719 $2,094
$2,455,719Est. Project Cost
$2,440,000
$0
2022 - 2027 Funding
$13,625Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Rong Liu
Project Location Citywide
I - 40
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14190100
Design plans and specifications for the development of necessary water supply expansion improvements needed due to expected growth.

Project Description
Ensure the City has sufficient water treatment capacity for the future water demands of the City o f Sacramento.

Project Objectives
Long range water demand projections, based on General Plan projections, have identified a potential shortage of water treatment capacity around 2035.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
WATER+ PROGRAMProject Name
$3,196,341 $3,196,341 $3,000,000 $1,500,000 $5,400,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,0006001 WATER IMPACT FEE $1,591,639 $1,577,980 $3,000,000 $1,500,000 $5,400,000 $4,530,580 $4,500,0006005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$6,000,000 $3,000,000 $10,800,000 $5,530,580 $5,500,000Total $4,787,980 $4,774,321 $35,618,560Est. Project Cost
$30,830,580
$6,000,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$13,659Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2018Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Megan Thomas
Project Location Citywide
I - 41
City of Sacramento
Capital Improvement Program Z14210100
Maintenance projects, upgrades due to regulatory changes, safety improvements, or updating antiquated electrical equipment are examples of projects to be designed and implemented.

Project Description
Make available to the City a reliable 160 million gallons per day of water treatment capacity at the Sacramento River Water Treatment Plant (SRWTP).

Project Objectives
Miscellaneous projects are identified as critical for design and implementation to sustain the water treatment plant’s operations and reliability.

Existing Situation
None.Operating Budget
Impac
t
SRWTP IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMProject Name
$2,633,066 $2,595,830 $2,055,000 $2,014,000 $664,490 $1,000,000 $491,9706005 WATER Fund DescriptionFund 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27UnobligatedBudget 2/2022As of
$2,055,000 $2,014,000 $664,490 $1,000,000 $491,970Total $2,633,066 $2,595,830 $8,858,526Est. Project Cost
$6,225,460
$2,055,000
2022 - 2027 Funding
$37,236Prior Expenditures
FY2022/23 Funding
July 2020Project Start Date
Est. Complete Date
Percent Complete
Elapsed Time
0% 50% 80% 100%
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Council District
Plan Area
All
UtilitiesProject Manager , Michelle Carrey
Project Location Citywide
I - 42
6(&7,21±-
'HVFULSWLRQRI0DMRU)XQGLQJ
6RXUFHV
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 1

MAJOR FUNDING TYPES
There are four types of funds in the five-year CIP: General, Special Revenue, Capital Projects, and Enterprise & Internal Services. Each type may have restrictions and is described in the following table.

Fund # begins
with a… Fund Type Fund Type Description/Restrictions
1 General The City's principal operating fund that is supported by taxes and fees and which, generally, has no restrictions on its use. 2 Special
Revenue
Special revenue funds are used to account for activities supported by specific taxes or other revenue sources. These funds are generally required by statute, charter, or ordinance to finance specific governmental programs. Examples include Assessment or Community Facility Districts that provide services, as well as Measure A and other public works funding sources.
3 Capital
Projects
Capital projects funds are used to account for resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for capital outlays including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets. Examples include General Fund bond proceeds, Assessment or Community Facility District bond proceeds, and developer impact fees.
6 Enterprise
& Internal
Service
Enterprise funds are used to account for self-supporting programs that provide services on a user-fee basis to the general public.

Internal service funds are established to account for goods or services provided by one department within the City to other departments on a cost reimbursement basis.

MAJOR FUNDING SOURCES
Three funds provide more than half of the funding for the five-year CIP: the General Fund (Fund 1001), the Federal Capital Grants Fund (Fund 3703), and the Water Fund (Fund 6005). Federal Capital Grants for transportation projects have been, or will be, applied for in FY2022/23; reliance on this outside source has become increasingly important to leverage local resources. The Water Fund provides critical infrastructure repairs for the City’s water infrastructure. Due to the ongoing pandemic, the General Fund and the Measure U Fund have been prudently budgeted in alignment with the adopted budget policies and guidelines.

DEBT
The Debt Management Policy (Resolution No. 2019-0281) provides the framework for debt issuance to achieve the most effective financing solutions for needed capital improvements. The 2022-2027 CIP does not include the use of any capital debt. 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 2
Fund 1001
General Fund
The General Fund is the City’s principal governmental operating fund, which supports general government programs incl uding Charter Offices (City Attorney, City Auditor, City Clerk, City Manager, and City Treasurer); City Council; Fire; Police; Yo uth, Parks, and Community Enrichment; and other support and operating dep artments. The General Fund revenues include all monies not legally (or by sound financial management) accounted for in another fund. General Fund revenues incl ude property taxes, sales taxes, licenses, permits, fines, forfeitures, penalties, charges for services, and miscellaneous revenues (such as interest).

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
General Fund revenues are available for any use as directed by the City Council. There is no specific ordinance or legislation directing the use of funds.

Current and Previous Allocations

The General Fund provides annual funding
to various Public Safety Program projects,
including the Advanced Life Support
Equipment Program (F12000200) and the
Fire Apparatus Program (F12000300).

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $165,202,914

$9,105
$20,350
$7,940
$12,623
$15,480
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
General Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 3
Funds 2002 and 2036
Gas Tax and Road Maintenance & Rehabilitation Account Funds Gas Tax and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Funds largely derive from the City’s apportionment of the state excise tax on fuel used to propel a motor vehicle.

Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act, indexed the fuel tax to inflation and increased the fuel ta x to establish the RMRA. Effective July 1, 2021, the tax rate on gasoline was increased to $0.511 per gallon, of which $0.381 is allocated through the State’s Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and us ed for Gas Tax funding (Fund 2002), and the remaining $0.13 is allocated through the St ate’s Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) and used for RMRA funding (Fund 2036). Effective July 1, 2021, the tax rate for diesel fuel was increased to $0.389 per gallon, of which $0.173 is used for Gas Tax funding (Fund 2002), and half of the remaining $0.216 is used for RMRA funding (Fund 2036). RMRA funding is also supplemented by vehicle registration taxes. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration administers the tax, and the State Controller distributes the revenues from the tax.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
California Streets and Highways Code Sections 2103, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5 limit the use of the gas tax to research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways (and related pedestri an and bike facilities) or public transit guideways. California Streets and Highways Code Section 203 0 limits the use of RMRA funding to road maintenance, safe ty projects, railroad grade separations, complete street components (active transportation, transit, pedestr ian & bicycle), and traffic control devices.

In order to receive RMRA funds, each local agen cy must continue to meet a prescribed level of “maintenance of effort,” meaning that these funds cannot be used to replace expenditure levels for transportation purposes typically allocated from discretionary funding.

Current and Previous Allocations

Gas Tax funds largely support street
maintenance and traffic engineering
operations. Current allocations include the
Vision Zero Safety Program, the Drought
Tolerant Landscape Replacement Project,
the Transportation Corridor Improvements
Program, the Bridge Maintenance Program,
and the Active Transportation Safety
Program. The current allocation of RMRA
funds will be used for road maintenance in
the Transportation Corridor Program.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $37,547,950 $9,724
$11,123
$14,412
$11,367
$16,262
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Gas Tax & RMRA Funds
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 4
Fund 2007
Major Street Construction Fund
The Major Street Construction Fund derives revenues from a tax imposed by the City in 1978 on all building valuations for new construction or for alterations that add square footage to existing buildings.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Code Chapter 3.36 re stricts the use of these funds to construction, replacement, or alteration of roadways, bridges, traffic control, and lighting on major streets; use for maintenance and/or operations is not permitted nor is disaster reconstruction.

Current and Previous Allocations

Major street construction funding has been
used exclusively for transportation projects,
specifically the construction of major street-
related improvements. This year, most of
the funding will be used to provide matching
local funding for federal grants. In addition,
this fund has been used to support private
development within specified Finance Plans
for construction of ro ads of more than two
lanes. As a result, revenues are estimated
to be reduced by $500, 000 to $1.0 million
annually to account for these commitments.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $24,924,464

$0
$6,697
$7,676
$1,400 $1,400
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Major Street Construction Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 5
Fund 2008
Street Cut Fund
The Street Cut Fund accounts for fees collected from utility companies and City departments that cut or trench through city streets. The fee revenues are used to compensate the City for damage caused to the streets by offsetting the co st of future street repairs in the same “geographic area” as the cut that generated the fees. The City is in the process of updating this program.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Code Section 12.12.140 restricts the use of Street Cut Funds to the same geographic area as the cut or trench that generated the fees.

Current and Previous Allocations

Street Cut Funds have been used
exclusively for street repairs from trenching
or cutting into city streets.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $183,791

$150 $158
$174
$100
$25
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Street Cut Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 6
Fund 2012
Transportation Systems Management Fund
City Code Chapter 17.700 requires that developers of projects who employ 25 or more employees comply with one of several Transportation Systems Management (TSM) measures to better utilize existing transportation facilities and to pay for capital improvements that would benefit the downtown transportation network as fulfillments of the TSM measure.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, City Code Chapter 17.700, restricts funds so they may only be used on facilities that increase the people moving capacity of the existing transportation system.

Current and Previous Allocations

TSM funds will be used to support various
transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects in
the downtown area.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $365,626

$112
$0 $0 $0
$14
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Transportation Systems
Management Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 7
Fund 2013
Transportation Development Act Fund
The Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds are used to account for receipts and disbursements of money allocat ed pursuant to the State of Ca lifornia TDA. These funds are allocated by population for transit use. T he Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) administers the funds. The City of Sacramento’s allocation is provided to the Sacramento Regional Transit Distr ict (SacRT). After administration fees are deducted, up to 2% of the available funds c ountywide may be set aside to be allocated for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The City directly receives this 2% share by apportionment from SACOG.

Traditionally these funds have been dedicated to bikeway facilities development and upgrades as well as bike trail maintenance.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
The State of California TDA (Government Code Title III, Divis ion 3, Chapter 2, Article II), restricts these funds to pedestr ian and bikeway improvements (2%) or for community transit improvements (administered by SacRT).

Current and Previous Allocations

TDA funds have largely supported the
maintenance and developm ent of off-street
bikeway projects.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $2,061,226

$350
$378 $381
$400 $400
$320
$340
$360
$380
$400
$420
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Transportation Development Act
Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 8
Fund 2016
Development Services Fund
This fund is comprised of developer funds re ceived to account for major plan review and building permit projects, cyclical surplus pl an review and building permit revenues, and environmental impact review projects.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Council Resolution No. 99-077 restricted the use of these funds to account for major plan review and building permit projects, cyclical surplus plan review and building permit revenues, and environmental impact review projects. In May 2015, a Development Services Contingency Reserve (DSCR) and Development Services Fund Management Policy was approved with Resolution No. 2015-0123. This established policies and procedures for the Development Services Fund to ensure that funds will be used for the management of development activities and to ensure adequate fund reserves will be avai lable to address revenue shortfalls or an unforeseen recession in development activity.

Current and Previous Allocations

The fund has been used to support
development-related initiatives and to
advance monies for the General Plan
update.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $17,720,490

$992
$1,387 $1,451 $1,451 $1,378
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Development Services Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 9
$3,712
$2,991
$3,532 $3,518
$5,052
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
New Measure A Construction and
Maintenance Funds
Funds 2026, 2038, and 2039
New Measure A Construction and Maintenance Funds
New Measure A Project Construction and Ne w Measure A Project Maintenance Funds account for revenue generated from a one-half of one percent sales (to each fund) tax beginning April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2039. New Measure A also introduces and incorporates a countywide development im pact fee program. Sales tax revenues and development impact fee revenues are allocated annually by percentage to specific programs according to Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) Ordinance No. STA 04-01. The two New Measure A Construction programs mentioned below were comingled in Fund 2025 until February 2018. The New Measur e A Construction Fund number was replaced with Funds 2038 and 2039 to make revenue and expenditure accounting clearer and more transparent.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
The City is required to enter into an agreement with the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) to receive New Measure A funds and ex pend them exclusively on eligible programs.

Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act (Public Utility Code Division 19, Section 180000, and Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 7252.16) restricts the New Measure A Construction Funds, which has two program components affecting the city:

Traffic Control and Safety (Fund 2038): Traffic control system improvem ents, high priority pedestrian and vehicle safety projects, and emergency vehicle pre-emption systems)

Safety, Landscaping, Pedestrian, and Bike Facilities (Fund 2039): Non-motorized, pedestrian, and bicycle safety improvements

New Measure A Maintenance (Fund 2026) is restricted to the preservation and safety of public streets and road rights-of-way, including road reconstruction and repair, bridge maintenance, streetscape, and li
ghting maintenance.

Current and Previous Allocations

New Measure A Funds will largely support
the ongoing citywide programs, including
the Active Transportation Programs, Vision
Zero Safety Program, Traffic Operations
Center Program, and maintenance
programs. New Measure A Construction
funding was allocated to Funds 2038 and
2039 be
ginning in FY2018/19.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $18,154,616 2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 10
Fund 2035
Tree Planting and Replacement Fund
The Tree Planting and Replacement Fund was established by City Ordinance No. 2016-0026 on August 4, 2016, which was enac ted for the purpose of the co nservation of existing tree resources and to optimize the City’s tree canopy coverage. Funding is collected from a fee charged for the loss of City a nd private protected trees withi n the City in-lieu of tree replacement, and from associated civil penalties.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Code Section 12.56. 060.F mandates that fees collected shall be used only for tree planting (establishing new planting locations and s upport systems such as the installation of drainage) and preservation program s (creation of new woodland areas, under-plantings as part of a tree planting program, and other planting activities).

Current and Previous Allocations

Previous Tree Planting and Replacement
funding has been deposited to the Tree
Planting and Replacement Program
(R15188500), and future allocations will also
be programmed to this CIP.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $767,110

$120
$127
$120 $120 $120
$116
$118
$120
$122
$124
$126
$128
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Tree Planting & Replacement Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 11
Fund 2232
Landscaping and Lighting District Fund
Established in 1989 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the Landscaping and Lighting District (L&L) Fund is for revenues generated from a citywide assessment district with assessments based on a se ries of benefit formulas established in 1989. Assessments are collected on an annual basis with property owners’ property taxes.

Funds are used for urban forestry operations, safety lighting, median maintenance, parks rehabilitation, street maintenance, and neighborhood lighting maintenance. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 allows cities, counties, and special districts to levy assessments for land purchase and the construction, operation, and maintenance of parks, tree maintenance, landscaping, lighting, traffic signals, and graffiti abatement.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
Adopted in 1989 (Resolution No. 89-600), California Streets & Highways Code Section 22500 et seq restricts the funds according to an assessment formula and the established District.

Revenues are collected for specific expenditure categories, such as urban forestry, park maintenance, lighting, capital projects, and median maintenance. Funds are available for expenditure within the Community Planning Area originally as sessed and should be used within the year allocated.

Current and Previous Allocations

L&L funds have largely supported
landscaping, rehabilitation of park facilities
and structures, lighting, and other park and
recreational improvements.

Landscaping and Lighting Bonds of $7.2
million were issued in FY1995/96 to finance
capital improvements of parks. The debt
service on these bonds is paid from the
assessments, which expired after tax year
2016.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $7,121,957

$1,365
$665
$865
$665 $665
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Lanscaping and Lighting Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 12
Fund 2401
Measure U Fund
Approved in November 2012, the Essential Service Prot ection Measure (Measure U) authorized an additional one-half cent transaction and use tax for the City of Sacramento to become effective on April 1, 2013, and to remain effective for six years. In November 2018, Measure U was renewed and expanded to a full cent transaction and use tax for the City of Sacramento effective April 1, 2019.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
The first half-cent tax of M easure U was designated for the restoration and protection of essential City public safety services, incl uding 911 response, police officers, gang/youth violence prevention, fire protection/emergen cy medical response, and other essential City services including park maintenance, yout h/senior services, and libraries. In 2018, Sacramento voters renewed Measure U as a full one-cent tax. As a general tax, Measure U revenues are available for any use as directed by the City Council. As part of the approved measure, there are independent annual financial audits and a citizen oversight commission.

Current and Previous Allocations

Measure U funds have been allocated to
support the Facility ADA Compliance
Program (C13000400) and the City Facility
Reinvestment Program (C13900000).

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $46,465,658

$0
$3,639
$3,341
$2,000
$2,600
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Measure U Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 13
Fund 2608
Marina Fund
The 475-berth Marina operates as a special revenue fund, and Marina revenues are derived predominantly from berth rental fees, fuel sa les, equipment rental, and concession sales at the Sacramento Marina, located on the Sacramento River at Miller Regional Park.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
In Resolution No. 2013-0156, the Marina Fund was changed from an enterprise fund to a special revenue fund. Special revenue funds are used to account for activities supported by specific taxes or other revenue sources whereas enterprise funds are self-sufficient.

Cities have general authority to impose fees, so metimes called charges or rates, under the city’s police powers as defined by Article XI, Section 7 or Article XIIIB, Section 8 of the California Constitution. There are no spec ific procedures for fee and rate adoption (Government Code Sections 54 954.6 and 66000 et seq.). Funds are restricted for use in Marina operations and capital improvements and ma y not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing services.

Other restrictions on the avail ability of this fund includes t he repayment of the California Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) loan of $7.65 million for the North Basin Renovation in 1985 and $9 million for the South Basin Renovation in 2005.

Current and Previous Allocations

Marina Funds support Marina operations
and capital projects such as docking facility
replacement, harbor dredging, and bank
stabilization.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $1,043,368

$260
$60 $60
$100 $100
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Marina Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 14
Fund 3204
Park Development Impact Fee Fund
The Park Development Impact Fee is a revenue source approved by City Council in August 1999. This fund is comprised of fees collected from developers at the time a building permit is issued. The revenue must be used to benefit the residents from which the fee was collected.

In 2004, an automatic annual adjustment for inflation was added to the ordinance to keep current with increasing construction costs. City Ordinance No. 2013-0017 aligned the ordinance with the 2010 census, the 2035 General Plan, and other chapters of the City Code.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Ordinance No. 2013-0017 restrict s funds for recreational and park facilities to serve the residents of the area where the fees were paid.

Current and Previous Allocations

The Park Development Impact Fee has
largely supported new development and
rehabilitation projects for parks and
recreation. Prior to FY2013/14, funding was
allocated by Community Plan Areas. Funds
are now allocated by City Council District.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $31,928,783

$2,976 $3,409
$4,780 $4,667
$2,675
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Park Development Impact Fee
Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 15
Fund 3206
North Natomas Financing Plan Public Facilities Fee Fund This Public Facility Fee (PFF) was established as the North Natomas Community Improvement Fund with the adoption of the North Natomas Financing Plan (NNFP). The plan was first approved in 1994 and was last updated in 2005.

The PFF area includes the entire North Natomas Community Plan. This PFF will ultimately fund $209.1 million dollars in public improvement facilities. These include a fire station, police sub-station, a community center library, an aquatics center, shuttles, bikeways, freeway improvements, landscaping, major roads, bridges, and signals. Payment of the PFF is required of all private development proj ects in North Natomas. The im pact fee is structured to ensure that basic infrastructure is in place when needed for the development; the cost of major infrastructure is distributed equally among t he property owners; and each developer pays a fair-share for necessary infrastructure.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Ordinance No. 95-058 restricts these funds as specified in the NNFP. Resolution No. 2014-0179, Section 7, established this fund and prior allocations were moved to this fund. The PFF was split into five funds with Resolution No. 2014-0179.

Current and Previous Allocations

This fee has been spent in accordance with
the NNFP.

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $107,141

$12 $12 $12 $12 $12
$0
$4
$8
$12
$16
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
North Natomas Financing Plan Public
Facilities Fee Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 16
Fund 3215
Transportation Development Impact Fee Fund
The Transportation Development Impact Fee (TDIF) was established effective July 1, 2017 and imposed on building permits and changes in use that would result in impacts on citywide transportation facilities.

Where area finance plans includ e transportation improvements th at provide citywide benefit and are included in the TDIF capital list, the TD IF will be reduced to account for the finance plan contribution toward these facilities.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
City Ordinance No. 2017-0012 est ablished the TDIF and restri cted its use to finance the design, construction, installation, improvement, and acquisition of the infrastructure identified in the TDIF nexus study, and to reimburse the City for the costs of administering the fund. City Resolution No. 2017-0071 inco rporated the TDIF Nexus Study and Expenditure Plan, authorized the initial amounts of the development impact fee and the TDIF administrative fee, and established categories for which the fees can be imposed. Reso lution No. 2018-0135 amended the fee rates, which are tied to the ENR Construction Cost Index.

Improvements eligible for TDIF funding in clude roadway improvements, including all “Complete Streets” elements (e.g., signals, street lighting, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities), and alternative mode facilities, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements.

Current and Previous Allocations
Because TDIF funding is received from
development activity which can vary
significantly from year to year, funding is
allocated after revenues are received. TDIF
has supporting projects such as Niños
Parkway Phase 2 Project, Downtown
Mobility projects, and North 12
th Complete
Street project. The allocation for FY23 is
programmed to the De l Rio Trail Project
(K15165100).

Capital funding budgeted through February 2022: $4,743,000

$0 $0
$2,500
$0
$1,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23
CIP Appropriations (in thousands)
Transportation Development
Impact Fee Fund
2022-2027 Proposed Capital Improvement Program

J - 17
Fund 3338
Florin Depot Industrial Park Fund
In 1987, the City authorized the issuance of bonds through the Fl orin Depot Industrial Park Assessment District to finance acquisition and construction of public improvements (Resolution No. 1987-0877). All improvements to be acquired with proc eeds of the Florin Depot Bonds were completed by 1990, leaving a surplus of $169,495 in the Capital Project Fund for those bonds. In 1993, the City formed the Reassessment District No. 93-05 (“RAD I”), issued the Limited Obligation Refunding Bonds for the Flor in Depot and Oates Industrial Parks, and used the proceeds of the RAD I Bonds to refund a portion of the Florin Depot Bonds. Since then, the fund has grown through earned interest to its present balance of $564,000.

Restrictions/Legal Mandates
After all public improvements were completed, the only appropriate uses were (1) to pay the portion of RAD I debt service that is allocable to the Florin Depot AD properties currently within RAD I; (2) to pay the debt serv ice on the outstanding Florin Depot Bonds that is allocable to the Florin Depot properties outside of RAD I; and (3) to pay expenses that otherwise benefit the original Florin Depot proper ties, such as the cost of maintaining the improvements acquired with the Florin Depot Bonds (Resolution No. 1985-0901 and Resolution No. 2017- 0113). The Florin Depot AD Bonds have matured, so no debt service is owed for them, leaving maintenance as the appropriate use. Maintenance is restricted to the Fl orin Depot Industrial Park area that includes the following roadways: Unsworth Av enue, Outfall Circle, Younger Creek Drive, a portion of Florin-Perkins Road, Sky Creek Drive, Blue Sky Court, and a portion of Elder Creek Road.

Current and Previous Allocations
Florin Depot Industrial Park Bond proceeds
were originally used to construct public
improvement infrastructure, such as curbs,
gutters and sidewalks, driveways, sanitary
sewer mains and storm drains, street
lighting, underground electrical service, and
more. The current alloca tion is to the Florin
Depot Industrial Park Project (R15235000)
for the maintenance of those improvements.