Cities Index.
5PM Item 08 - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund - Fiscal Year 2022 - 23 (PDF-337 KB)

Sacramento City Council
May 17, 2022

Document
5PM Item 08 - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund - Fiscal Year 2022 - 23 (PDF-337 KB)
Meeting
May 17, 2022
Body
Sacramento City Council
Pages
2
Original file
345 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sacramento.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

City Council Report
915 I Street, 1st Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org

File ID: 2022-00983 May 17, 2022 Consent Item 08

Title: Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund: Fiscal Year 2022/23 Programming

Location: Districts 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8

Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution identifying projects to be funded with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) funds (Fund 2036) in Fiscal Year 2022/23

Contact: Lucinda Willcox, Program Manager, (916) 808-5052, [email protected]; Greg Smith, Senior Engineer, (916) 808-8364, [email protected]; Jose Sanchez, Streets Manager, (916) 808-2254, [email protected]; Department of Public Works

Presenter: None

Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution Approving RMRA Projects
3-Exhibit A (RMRA List of Projects for FY2022/23)

Description/Analysis

Issue Detail: Pursuant to Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, prior to receiving an apportionment of formula-based Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Act (RMRA) funds from the State Controller, the City must annually submit to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) a list of projects proposed to be funded in part or whole with these funds prior to July 1st. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23, the City is estimated to receive $11.1 million in RMRA funds, which are budgeted annually in the Transportation Corridor Program as part of the Capital Improvement Program.

Since available funding covers less than 20 percent of what is needed annually, resurfacing activities have been prioritized based on criteria adopted by the City Council. The list focuses on projects that achieve multiple objectives, including those that support improvements to address safety, support bicycle and pedestrian mobility, youth destination, serve under- resourced areas, leverage or support outside funding, and improve streets with higher traffic volumes and bus routes. This analysis is included in more detail in the Background description.

The roadways listed below and described more fully in Exhibit A are proposed to be funded in whole or in part using the balance of past years’ RMRA funding and anticipated FY2022/23 revenue. The plan may be amended by the City if necessary at any time without state action.

 Northgate neighborhood*
 Downtown Mobility Project*
 Del Paso Boulevard Road Diet and Safety Project*
 Silver Eagle Road Rehabilitation
 Lampasas Boulevard Safety Project support*
 Florin Road Vision Zero Safety Project*
 Broadway Vision Zero Safety Project*
 34
th Street Bike Lanes and Pedestrian Safety Project*
 West El Camino Improvement Project*
 Bell Avenue Complete Streets Rehabilitation Project
 T Street Improvements

The following projects will use this funding for preliminary design only; this effort is intended to position these larger projects for future grant applications:

 Marysville Boulevard Vision Zero Safety Project*
 El Camino Avenue Vision Zero Safety Project*

The following projects reflect roadways with shared City-County boundaries, with funding to be shared between agencies:

 Franklin Boulevard Overlay Project, Turnbridge to A Parkway (to be delivered by County)*
 Fruitridge Boulevard Overlay Project, SR99 to Stockton Boulevard (to be delivered by County)
 Howe Avenue Overlay Project, Marconi Avenue to Auburn Boulevard (to be delivered by County)

It often requires more than one fiscal year to complete a project and can take multiple years from initial planning to deliver more complex projects that incorporate safety improvements, road diets, or that leverage grant funds. Several projects as noted above with asterisks (*) were included in last year’s programming and are being carried forward for FY2022/23, including projects that will be under construction later this Summer.

Policy Considerations: The recommendations meet the eligibility and outcomes specified in the State legislation governing use of these funds. Recommended projects are consistent with the General Plan, Community and Specific Plans, Bikeway Master Plan, Vision Zero Action Plan, and other transportation planning documents, as well as those included the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy.

Projects were prioritized based on the criteria for transportation funding adopted in Resolution No. 2019-0475.

Economic Impacts: These will be analyzed when construction contracts are awarded.

Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Programming funding is an administrative activity and is not considered a project under CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 Cal. Code Reg. §15000 et seq.) § 15378 (b)(4).

Sustainability: The City uses pavement mixes incorporating a mix of recycled materials when possible. In connection with pavement rehabilitation, the City will incorporate improved accessibility and active transportation improvements where feasible.

Restoring roads before they fail reduces construction time which results in less air pollution from heavy equipment and less water pollution from site run-off.

Commission/Committee Action: None.

Rationale for Recommendation: The California Transportation Commission requires a Resolution identifying annual plans for anticipated RMRA funds in order for the City to receive its apportionment of funds. With the condition of the city’s roadway network, the annual funding apportionment is about one-fifth the funding that is needed to maintain the average citywide pavement quality at its current level (fair), and about 15% of what is needed to bring the City’s pavement into a state of good repair.

Given the scarcity of funding relative to the need, these recommendations focus on major arterials and collectors that carry higher volumes of traffic and where resurfacing can support improvements to corridors on the high injury network based on the Vision Zero Action Plan and support other safety efforts, traffic calming, or active transportation improvements. Several projects were previously approved but not yet completed and are carried over from the prior year’s approved plan.

Financial Considerations: Based on available projections, $11.1 million in RMRA funds (Fund 2036) are budgeted as part of the proposed FY2022/23 Capital Improvement Program in the Transportation Corridor Program (R15200000).

Total City costs for the projects listed in Exhibit A are approximately $76 million; approximately $35 million in RMRA funds will be needed for these projects, including past expenditures and anticipated needs in future years. No contracts will be awarded unless funding is available to cover the contracts and staff costs.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

Background:

State Requirements: Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, was signed into law on April 28, 2017. Beginning on November 1, 2017, the State Controller deposited revenues from the increased fuel taxes into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A percentage of this new RMRA funding is apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system.

RMRA funds must be used for expenditure on basic road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, and on critical safety projects. Eligible uses include the following:

 Road maintenance and rehabilitation
 Safety projects
 Railroad grade separations
 Complete streets components (including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and stormwater capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project)
 Traffic control devices
 Funds may also be used to satisfy a match requirement in order to obtain state or federal funds for projects.

SB 1 emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency in the delivery of California’s transportation programs.

Prior to receiving an apportionment of RMRA funds from the Controller in a fiscal year, a city or county must submit to the CTC before the stated deadline, a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds. The list of projects must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement [SHC 2034(a)(1)].

The project list does not limit the flexibility of an eligible city or county to fund projects in accordance with local needs and priorities so long as the projects are consistent with RMRA priorities as outlined in SHC 2030(b) [SHC 2034(a)(1)].

The CTC will report to the Controller the cities and counties that have submitted a list of projects as described in SHC 2034(a)(1) and that are therefore eligible to receive an apportionment of RMRA funds for the applicable fiscal year [SHC 2034(a)(2)]. The deadline for submission to the CTC for fiscal year FY22/23 on June 30, 2022. The Controller, upon receipt of the report from the Commission, shall apportion RMRA funds to eligible cities and counties pursuant to SHC 2032(h) [SHC 2034(a)(2)].

For each fiscal year in which RMRA funds are received and expended, cities and counties must submit documentation to the Commission that includes a description and location of each completed project, the amount of funds expended on the project, the completion date, and the estimated useful life of the improvement [SHC 2034(b)].

Roadway Conditions

The City prepares a report every two years that assesses its overall pavement conditions and estimates funding implications. The City’s current Pavement Condition Index (PCI), which measures pavement conditions on a scale of 1 to 100 reports a citywide average PCI of 59, which is considered “fair.” The citywide deferred maintenance backlog is estimated at approximately $289 million in needed repairs, an increase of 30% since 2020. With only 15% to 20% of the annual funding stream available that is needed to adequately address roadway rehabilitation, at current investment levels, the unfunded backlog is expected to continue to increase exponentially. It is estimated to reach about $1 billion in ten years with a projected average citywide PCI of 42.

The primary mechanism to address street maintenance has been the state gas tax. In 2017, the State increased the statewide gas tax for the first time in nearly 25 years in response to a statewide crisis in poor pavement conditions on state highways and local streets throughout the state. With the gas tax formerly set at a flat rate that was not indexed to inflation, by 2017 the amount of gas tax generated statewide had about half the spending power it had in decades earlier, which was manifested in gradual disinvestment in pavement maintenance.

Many counties and jurisdictions had implemented local funding measures to support pavement maintenance to help offset some of the loss in spending power. Sacramento County voters approved a countywide transportation sales tax measure (Measure A), which provided additional funding for street maintenance among other transportation expenditures.

The City of Sacramento has some of the oldest roads in the state, with a roadway network developed over the last 150 years. Decades of inadequate investment in pavement maintenance has resulted in thousands of miles of needed roadway rehabilitation and overall pavement conditions that are in a steep decline.

The additional funding from the 2017 gas tax increase may have been in time for those communities with newer streets or those that were able to devote sufficient local or federal funding for pavement rehabilitation to offset the loss in gas tax availability. For those communities, the new revenue was in time to alter the trajectory of deteriorating PCI and allow for gradual improvement. Unfortunately, for many of those older and less wealthy communities that that did not have sufficient street maintenance funding in the decades before 2017, pavement conditions have declined to a level that requires more annual funding than is currently available from the increased gas tax revenues or is foreseeable from other local, state, and federal sources in order to alleviate the ongoing decline in pavement conditions.

The amount needed annually from the City to arrest the steep decline is five times the amount it currently receives. It would require over $58 million annually over the next ten years to remain at its current average PCI of 59, and over $97 million annually to bring the network into a state of good repair (average PCI of 75).

Roadway Selection

With limited funding compared to the need, it is necessary to prioritize where the funding will be spent. Other than those recently constructed, nearly every roadway in the City would benefit from some kind of pavement treatment. In order to identify which roadways should be selected for treatment, City staff analyzed eligible projects against the criteria identified in Resolution 2019-0475, as described below. Note that these criteria were adopted as an interim measure pending the adoption of the Transportation Priorities Plan (TPP). Future selections will be evaluated against the TPP criteria.

 Safety: Projects that address safety on the Vision Zero High Injury Network or are funded through the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) were given the highest priority. These actions are based on the Vision Zero Top 5 Corridors Plan adopted by the City Council in February 2021.

 State of Good Repair: This funding is intended for roadway rehabilitation. The Corridor Program aims to include pavement rehabilitation as an element of other projects (e.g., complete streets projects) wherever feasible.

 VMT/GHG Reduction: Projects were selected that support bus routes and support increased bicycle and pedestrian access.

 Technology Advancement: Where appropriate, projects will upgrade traffic signals and crossing technology.

 Youth: Projects were selected that serve schools, high schools, parks, and other youth- oriented destinations, with an emphasis to incorporate pedestrian and bicycle improvements whenever possible.

 Cost Effective: Wherever possible, funding is used to leverage or support grant funds or other efforts and to complete preliminary design efforts to make projects more attractive for future grant funding efforts. In order to apply funding to reach the highest number of users, roadways were selected that carry the highest traffic volumes, meaning arterials and collectors were prioritized over residential streets. Roadways with the highest costs in frequent emergency repairs may be selected as rehabilitation can reduce local costs associated with having to frequently fill potholes or make other repairs.

 Equity: Staff reviewed projects against various equity considerations to support projects that benefit communities that are under-resourced and with lower levels of infrastructure investment.

In order to maximize the benefit to those roadways with higher volumes and those that support grant efforts, no new residential neighborhoods are included this fiscal year’s plan other than one that was included in previous plans and is being carried over to be completed this Summer. Based on adopted criteria, this trend will continue.

Residential streets comprise over 63 percent of the city’s total lane miles, and almost all of the residential streets in the City warrant some kind of pavement treatment, from preventative maintenance in newer areas to many neighborhoods with very aged pavement as well as many neighborhoods with impacts from a variety of underground utility work (i.e., gas, electric, water, sewer, and telecommunication agencies and companies installing or repairing underground infrastructure). While there is clearly community demand and an identified need for repairs on residential roadways, there is just not adequate funding to address residential road repair. The estimated need to bring the city’s residential streets alone into a state of good repair is $52 million annually for the next ten years.

Even if the city were to alter its funding criteria and no longer address pavement rehabilitation on more heavily travelled corridors, it could still only address one to three residential neighborhoods per year with its available funding.

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
Approving a List of Projects for Fiscal Year 2022/23
Funded by SB 1: the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Funds (RMRA)

BACKGROUND:

A. Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 in order to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide.

B. SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents and businesses of the City of Sacramento are aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which project have been completed each fiscal year.

C. The City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement.

D. The City will receive an estimated to receive $11.1million in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 from SB1. The FY2022/23 Capital Improvement Program allocates $11.1 million in budget for RMRA funds (Fund 2036) in the Transportation Corridor Program (R15200000).

E. SB1 funding will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1.

F. The City has relied on public input for various planning efforts process to ensure public input into the community’s transportation priorities that informed the project list.

G. The City used a Pavement Management System to inform the SB1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment.

H. The funding from SB1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate its over 3,000 lane miles of streets/roads and 209 bridges, add safety improvements and active transportation infrastructure throughout the City, and support similar projects into the future.

I. The 2022 Pavement Condition Report found that the City’s streets and roads are in “fair” condition with an average Pavement Condition Index of 59 on a scale of 1 to 100, with a $289 million backlog in deferred maintenance. SB1 revenues will help slow the deterioration in the overall quality of the City’s road system.

J. The SB1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The projects in the Transportation Corridor Program (R15200000) which are proposed to be funded in part or in full with RMRA funds (Fund 2036) in FY2022/23 are listed in Exhibit A. Exhibit A includes projects carried over from the previous fiscal year. With the relisting of these projects, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State the intent to fund these projects in part or whole with RMRA funds.

Section 2. Exhibit A is incorporated as part of this Resolution.

Table of Contents
Exhibit A - RMRA List of Projects for FY2022/23

EXHIBIT A
RMRA LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FY2022/23
Project Title Project Description Project Location Council District Useful Life Estimated Schedule Status
Northgate Neighborhood Pavement
rehabilitation (R15210019) (Carry over
from previous list)
Application of a cape seal treatment to existing asphalt roadway, installation of ADA compliant curb ramps and associated drainage inlet improvements.

This project was included in the FY20/21 program to follow new water main installation associated with City water meter installation.

Northgate neighborhood bounded
by Camarillo Drive to the north,
Garden Highway to the south,
Stonecreek Drive to the west, and
Northgate Blvd to the east.
3 15 years Fall 2020 to Winter
2022
Curb ramp and other prep installation
completed. Pavement rehabilitation
contract schedued for award in Spring
2022.

Downtown Mobility Project
(T15195000) (Carry over from previous
list)
Application of a microsurfacing treatment to existing asphalt roadway on some corridors and an overlay over the existing pavement structure on other corridors in connection with the state funded project in the Central City: Class IV Bikeways on P Street (15th to 21st), Q Street (14th to 21st), 10th Street (Q to Broadway), 9th Street (L to Q Street); 19th Street (H to Broadway), 21st Street (H to Broadway); lane reduction and Class IV bikeways on I Street (12th to 21st Streets); two-way conversions of 5th Street (from H Street to Broadway)
Central City - P Street (15th to 21st),
Q Street (15th to 21st), 10th Street
(Q to Broadway), 9th Street (L to Q
Street), 5th Street (H Street to
Broadway), I Street (12th to 21st);
19th Street (H to Broadway), 21st
Street (H to Broadway)
4 15 to 30 years
Fall 2023 to Winter
2024 (references
RMRA funding
which is used for
construction only)
Part of Downtown Mobility Project funded
through State Local Partnership Program
(LPP): Completing design: construction
award in FY22/23
Del Paso Boulevard Road Diet and
Safety Project (R15210021)(Carry over
from previous list)
Lane reduction, pavement treatment and other curb and sidewalk improvements. The intent of these improvements is to address the collision history of the corridor by slowing down automobile traffic, modernizing signal equipment, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Del Paso Blvd from Marysville Blvd
to Arcade Blvd 2 15 to 30 years January 2020 to
Winter 2023
Complete design work and analysis in FY22.

Construction in FY22/23
Silver Eagle Road Rehabilitation
Roadway rehabilitation on Silver Eagle Road to follow installation of underground regional sewer main in roadway. Project will also add buffered bike lanes.

Silver Eagle Road at Norwood
Avenue to San Juan Road at
Northgate Boulevard. 2 15 years Spring 2022 to
Summer 2024
Complete design work in 2022. Complete
pavement rehabilitation after installation of
regional sewer main in 2024.

Lampasas Avenue and Rio Linda
Boulevard Safety Project
(T15205500)(Carry over from previous
list)
Roadway rehabilitation on Rio Linda Boulevard adjacent to Lampasas Avenue and Rio Linda Boulevard intersection to support planned safety improvements at that intersection
Rio Linda Blvd (Lampasas to Eleanor
Ave). 2 15 years Fall 2021 to Spring
2023
Complete design and initiate construction
in FY22/23. Supports federally funded
safety project.

Florin Road Vision Zero Safety Project
(T15215800) (Carry over from previous
list)
Roadway rehabiltation on Florin Road to bring the pavement conditions to a state of good repair and support grant-funded project. The project will also include continuous bike lane coverage, sidewalk improvements, additional visible marked crossings, upgrading existing unsignalized crossings to controlled crossings, modifying signals to provide protected left turns, and installing advanced dilemma zone detection at intersections. The intent of these improvements is to address the collision history of the corridor by slowing down automobile traffic, modernizing signal equipment, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Florin Road from 24th Street to
Franklin Boulevard 5, 8 30 years Spring 2021 to
Spring 2025
Complete design work and analysis in
FY22/23. Complete construction in two
segments: FY23/24, supporting State Local
Partnership Program (LPP) and and
FY24/25, supporting SACOG grant.

Broadway Vision Zero Safety Project
(R15210000) (Carry over from previous
list)
Pavement rehabilitation and safety improvements, to include closing bike lane gaps, sidewalk improvements, additional visible marked crossings, upgrading existing unsignalized crossings to controlled crossings, modifying signals to provide protected left turns, and installing advanced dilemma zone detection at intersections. The intent of these improvements is to address the collision history of the corridor by slowing down automobile traffic, modernizing signal equipment, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Broadway from Martin Luther King
Jr Boulevard to Stockton Boulevard 5 15 to 30 years Summer 2022 to Fall 2023
Complete design work and analysis in
FY22/23. Construction to begin in FY23/24

Page 1 of 2 ends

EXHIBIT A
RMRA LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FY2022/23
Project Title Project Description Project Location Council District Useful Life Estimated Schedule Status
West El Camino Avenue Roadway
Rehabilitation Project (R15210000)
Pavement rehabilitation for the corridor to bring the pavement conditions to a state of good repair, including intersection improvements, upgrade of bike facilities with buffers, and pedestrian crossing enhancements at trail crossing..

West El Camino Avenue from Truxel
Boulevard to Northgate Blvd 3 15 years Summer 2021 to
Spring 2024
Complete preliminary engineering and
design in FY22/23. Construction in FY23/24.
34th Street Bike Lanes and Pedestrian
Safety Project (R15210000)(Carry over
from previous list)
Pavement rehabitation with installation of new Class II bike lanes and pedestrian safety improvements
34th Street from T Street to 5th
Avenue 5, 6 15 years Summer 2021 to
Spring 2024
Complete preliminary engineering and
design in FY22/23 in preparation of
construction in FY23/24.

Bell Avenue Complete Streets
Rehabilitation Project (T15145600)
Pavement rehabilitation in connection with a federally-funded complete streets project to add missing elements on Bell Avenue, including new sidewalks and other pedestrian improvements, particularly at key insections, installation of bike lanes, and adding streetlighting.

Bell Avenue from the the cul-de-sac
at Bollenbacher Avenue to Astoria
Street
2 15 to 30 years Summer 2023 to
2024
Match funds for a federally-funded project.

Construction contract scheduled for award
in FY22/23
T Street Improvements Pavement rehabitation on section of T Street with installation of safety improvements and addition of bike lane at Stockton Boulevard intersection. 34th Street to Stockton Boulevard 5 15 years Summer 2021 to Spring 2024
Complete preliminary engineering and
design in FY22/23 in preparation of
construction in FY23/24.

Marysville Boulevard Vision Zero
Safety Project (T15215300):

Preliminary Engineering (Carry over
from previous list)
Preliminary design for project on the High Injury Network that includes a lane reduction, pavement rehabilitation, separated bike lanes, sidewalk improvements, additional visible marked crossings, upgrading existing unsignalized crossings to controlled crossings, modifying signals to provide protected left turns, and installing advanced dilemma zone detection at intersections. The intent of these improvements is to address the collision history of the corridor by slowing down automobile traffic, modernizing signal equipment, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Marysville Blvd from North Ave to
Del Paso Boulevard. 2 15 to 30 years Summer 2021 to
Spring 2024
Complete design work, analysis, and public
outreach in FY22/23 and FY23/24. Intent is
to seek grant funding for construction.

El Camino Avenue Vision Zero Safety
Project (T15216400): Preliminary
Engineering (Carry over from previous
list)
Preliminary design for project on the High Injury Network that includes pavement rehabilitation, closing bike lane gaps, sidewalk improvements, additional visible marked crossings, upgrading existing unsignalized crossings to controlled crossings, modifying signals to provide protected left turns, and installing advanced dilemma zone detection at intersections. The intent of these improvements is to address the collision history of the corridor by slowing down automobile traffic, modernizing signal equipment, and improving bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

El Camino Avenue from Del Paso
Boulevard to Steelhead Creek 2 15 to 30 years Summer 2021 to Spring 2024
Complete design work, analysis, and public
outreach in FY22/23 and FY23/24. Intent is
to seek grant funding for construction.

Franklin Boulevard Overlay Project
(Carry over from previous list)
Overlay pavement, add bike lanes where feasible. Project partially located within unincorporated county. Sacramento County will deliver and City RMRA funds will cover costs for the portion in incorporated city.

Franklin Boulevard (Turnbridge to A
Parkway), shared roadway with
unincorporated county
5 30 years Summer 2022 to
Summer 2024
Project to be designed and constructed by
Sacramento County with City of
Sacramento review. City will reimburse
County.

Fruitridge Boulevard Overlay Project
Overlay pavement. Project partially located within unincorporated county.

Sacramento County will deliver and City RMRA funds will cover costs for the portion in incorporated city.

SR99 to Stockton Boulevard 6 30 years Summer 2022 to
Summer 2024
Project to be designed and constructed by
Sacramento County with City of
Sacramento review. City will reimburse
County.

Howe Avenue Overlay Project
Overlay pavement. Project partially located within unincorporated county.

Sacramento County will deliver and City RMRA funds will cover costs for the portion in incorporated city.

Marconi Avenue to Auburn
Boulevard 6 30 years Summer 2022 to
Summer 2024
Project to be designed and constructed by
Sacramento County with City of
Sacramento review. City will reimburse
County.

Page 2 of 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting