Sacramento City Council
November 15, 2022

City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

Transportation Priorities Plan Initial Prioritization
File ID: 2022-01804
Location: Citywide
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution approving the Transportation Prioritization Plan prioritization as the City’s guidelines for transportation investments and funding opportunities.

Contact: Jennifer Donlon Wyant, Transportation Planning Manager, (916) 808-5913, [email protected]; David Edrosolan, Transportation Division Manager, (916) 808- 5974, [email protected]; Ryan Moore, Director of Public Works, (916) 808-6629, [email protected]; Department of Public Works Presenter: Jennifer Donlon Wyant, Transportation Planning Manager, (916) 808-5913, [email protected], Department of Public Works Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution
2A-TPP Prioritization
3-TPP Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary
Additional Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: Since the year 2000, City Council has approved over 700 transportation plans and projects that are estimated to cost $5 billion. This amount significantly exceeds the amount of funding through local and grant funds that the City can feasibly expect to receive. With so many more planned projects than resources to deliver them, the City needs a methodology to prioritize investments. The Transportation Priorities Plan (TPP) will be the vehicle to listen and work with Sacramento’s communities to prioritize transportation projects for investment and grant opportunities.

Staff applied the Council approved transportation prioritization criteria to all approved transportation projects and plans; shared the outcomes with Sacramento communities; and ask for Council review and approval of the prioritized list with some amendments as discussed in this staff report.

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

Policy Considerations: The initial priorities in this report are in accordance with the following policies from the Sacramento 2035 General Plan:

M 1.2.1 Multimodal Choices - The City shall develop an integrated, multimodal transportation system that improves the attractiveness of walking, bicycling, and riding transit over time to increase travel choices and aid in achieving a more balanced transportation system and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

M 1.2.4 Multimodal Access - The City shall facilitate the provision of multimodal access to activity centers such as commercial centers and corridors, employment centers, transit stops/stations, airports, schools, parks, recreation areas, medical centers, and tourist attractions.

M 1.3.2 Eliminate Gaps - The City shall eliminate “gaps” in roadways, bikeways, and pedestrian networks.

M 4.1.3 Community Outreach - The City shall conduct public outreach to community organizations and members of the general public in corridor planning early in the project development process to identify feasible opportunities to provide community benefits and to lessen any potential impacts of modifications to local streets and roadways.

M 4.2.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle-Friendly Streets - In areas with high levels of pedestrian activity (e.g., employment centers, residential areas, mixed-use areas, schools), the City shall ensure that all street projects support pedestrian and bicycle travel. Improvements may include narrow lanes, target speeds less than 35 miles per hour, sidewalk widths consistent with the Pedestrian Master Plan, street trees, high-visibility pedestrian crossings, and bikeways (e.g. Class II and Class III bike lanes, bicycle boulevards, separated bicycle lanes and/or parallel multi- use pathways).

M 4.2.5 Multi-Modal Corridors - Consistent with the Roadway Network and Street Typologies established in this General Plan, the City shall designate multi- modal corridors in the Central City, within and between urban centers, along major transit lines, and/or along commercial corridors appropriate for comprehensive multimodal corridor planning and targeted investment in transit, bikeway, and pedestrian path improvements if discretionary funds become available.

M 4.2.6 Identify and Fill Gaps in Complete Streets - The City shall identify streets that can be made “complete” either through a reduction in the number or width of travel lanes or through two-way conversions, with consideration for emergency vehicle operations. The City shall consider including new bikeways, sidewalks, on-street parking, and exclusive transit lanes on these streets by re-arranging and/or re-allocating how the available space within the public right of way issued.

The City’s Vision Zero Resolution (No. 2017-0032) establishes the following commitment to nearer- term GHG emissions reductions:

Section 4. Actions towards Vision Zero will be a comprehensive, collaborative, and equitable approach through engineering, education and culture change, and traffic enforcement

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

Section 5. Actions towards Vision Zero will be data driven based on available crash data.

Section 7. The City of Sacramento will work collaboratively in a data-driven effort to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2027.

The City’s Climate Emergency Declaration (Resolution No. 2019-0465) establishes the following commitment to nearer-term GHG emissions reductions:

Section 2. The City of Sacramento commits to building on existing climate commitments and to taking significant action to sustain and accelerate municipal and community carbon elimination in the short term, with maximum feasible efforts to implement emergency-speed carbon reduction actions towards eliminating emissions by 2030 as much as possible, recognizing that such a goal can only be reached through collaboration with regional partners as well as appropriate financial and regulatory assistance from state and federal authorities.

On November 12, 2019, the City Council adopted the following relevant Guiding Principles for the 2040 General Plan Update:

7. Take bold action to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 and become a leading voice in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to climate change.

12. Prioritize the most vulnerable (e.g., individuals with disabilities, linguistically isolated, and seniors) and underserved communities in developing climate solutions, and take action to build resilience at the household, neighborhood, and citywide scale.

13. Develop infrastructure to support zero emission transportation and provide viable options for low-income households.

14. Work to ensure that Sacramento is an equitable, inclusive, and just city for people of all ages, abilities, ethnicities, races, genders, sexual identities, incomes, and cultures, such that everyone can achieve their full potential here.

17. Prioritize community resources towards historically disadvantaged communities in an equitable manner

21. Promote equity, justice, and accountability with a concerted application of resources toward youth in greatest need.

26. Support workforce participation by improving access to efficient, affordable transportation, training, childcare, and senior care.

39. Strengthen connections between Sacramento neighborhoods, to neighboring communities, and to the wider region by expanding and enhancing the range of transportation options for people of all ages and abilities.

40. Reduce reliance on single-occupant vehicles, prioritize and promote active transportation and, high-occupancy transport.

41. Improve the efficiency of the multi-modal transportation system and plan infrastructure that can flexibly accommodate rapidly emerging modes of transportation.

42. Recognize that traffic deaths and serious injuries are a public health issue and, with a goal of reaching zero traffic by 2027 through the Vision Zero initiative, the City will make safety of human life the City's highest priority, taking proactive, preventative steps.

On March 15, 2022, the City Council adopted the following criteria, metrics and points for transportation investments and funding opportunities (R2022-0079):

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

1. Improving Air Quality, Climate and Health
a. Supports biking: 3 points
b. Supports walking: 6 points
c. Supports transit or electric vehicles: 3 points

2. Providing Equitable Investment
a. Provides infrastructure in neighborhoods that lack basic infrastructure: 6 points b. Benefits communities that have bene recipients of racism and bias: 6 points

3. Providing Access to Destinations
a. Connects to jobs: 4 points
b. Connects to schools: 4 points
c. Connects to parks: 4 points

4. Improving Transportation Safety
a. Improves a Vision Zero Top 10 corridor: 12 points
b. Improves a Vision Zero HIN Street (not top 10) or is a Vision Zero School Safety Project: 6 points

5. Fixing and Maintaining the System
a. Improves pavement or bridges: 8 points
b. Improves traffic signals: 4 points.

Economic Impacts: None.

Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): This transportation planning study is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies. Section 15262 exempts projects involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which have not been approved, adopted, or funded. It is anticipated that future projects identified in this plan may be subject to environmental evaluation under CEQA guidelines and possibly National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements.

Sustainability: The prioritization strategy recommended by City staff supports the City Council’s sustainability priorities. The transportation sector accounts for over 50% of community-wide greenhouse gas emissions, the largest single sector in the community. The City’s Climate Action Plan includes several implementation measures to reduce vehicle trips.

The strategy would support City Council approved transportation projects and programs that will increase active transportation, reduce vehicular trips, and help ensure more efficient vehicular flow. These actions will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help improve local air quality.

Commission/Committee Action: None.

Rationale for Recommendation: There is no recommendation or action at this time.

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

Financial Considerations: This action does not have any current direct financial implications; however, the determination of priorities will shape how future local transportation funds are expended funds (e.g., Gas Tax, Major Street Construction Tax, Measure A) and the selection of transportation grant applications..

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

Background: Phase 1 of the TPP included community listening and engagement regarding values for investing in transportation. Sacramento’s communities shared their values which are centered around air quality; climate and health; equitable investment; access to key destinations; safety; and maintaining the system.

Staff translated these values into metrics and on March 15, 2022, the City Council adopted the following prioritization criteria, metrics and points for transportation investments and funding opportunities (Resolution 2022-0079). Each criteria has a maximum of 12 points.

1. Improving Air Quality, Climate and Health
a. Supports biking: 3 points
b. Supports walking: 6 points
c. Supports transit or electric vehicles: 3 points

2. Providing Equitable Investment
a. Provides infrastructure in neighborhoods that lack basic infrastructure: 6 points
b. Benefits communities that have bene recipients of
racism and bias: 6 points

3. Providing Access to Destinations
a. Connects to jobs: 4 points
b. Connects to schools: 4 points
c. Connects to parks: 4 points

4. Improving Transportation Safety
a. Improves a Vision Zero Top 10 corridor: 12 points
b. Improves a Vision Zero HIN Street (not Top 10) or is a Vision Zero School Safety Project: 6 points

5. Fixing and Maintaining the System
a. Improves pavement or bridges: 8 points
b. Improves traffic signals: 4 points.

Phase 2 of the TPP is concluding with this recommendation to City Council for approval of the Transportation Priorities Plan Prioritization.

Phase 2 included mapping the over 700 planned projects; evaluating and scoring those projects according to the City Council adopted criteria; and conducting community engagement and listening to public comments on the Initial Prioritization.

The prioritization reflects community values and the criteria adopted by City Council in March 2022.

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

The outcomes include:
· 41 miles of the 364 miles of planned improvements are identified as initial high priority. · 70% of the initial high priority projects are on the City’s Vision Zero High Injury Network, or streets with the highest number of severe injuries and fatalities. · 73% of all projects that were in areas that lack basic infrastructure are also in communities that have been recipients of racism and bias.
· 85% of the initial high priority projects will improve connections to jobs. · 90% of the initial high priority projects are on streets with poor pavement and serve a lot of people.
· 95% of the initial high priority projects benefit communities that lack basic transportation infrastructure like sidewalks, streetlights, bikeways, trees or traffic signals.

Community engagement and comments were heard through many venues, with a sample of engagement is listed below:
· The Priorities Story page: This page was available in Chinese, English, Hmong, Spanish, and Vietnamese.
· Online Crowdsource Map: This online map allowed Sacramentans to review the initial prioritization and provide input. This map was available in Chinese, English, Hmong, Spanish, and Vietnamese.
· Attendance at Community Events and Meetings in August and early September 2022. · Virtual Community Meetings.

See Attachment 3 TPP Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary for a full description of engagement activities.

Staff tracked input by zip code and focused engagement in the communities with lower numbers of responses (South Sacramento and North Sacramento).

The purpose of the engagement was to share the initial priorities and ask:

1. If you disagree with a project’s initial prioritization, what prioritization do you think it should have and why?

2. Are there any projects approved by the City in other previous planning processes but are not currently on the list?

3. Are we missing a transportation need that is not in a City plan? Sacramento’s communities care deeply about transportation and City investments in mobility. They want the City to build the planned transportation improvements and recommended the projects listed below should be high priority in addition to the 41 projects that scored as high priority despite not best aligning with community and City Council adopted values and criteria. · 16th Street -with recommendations to revise to include separated bikeway · 59th Street Streetscape Improvements
· Arcade Boulevard Bike Lanes
· Arcade Creek Shared Use Path
· Elvas Avenue near Sacramento State
· Freeport Boulevard separated bikeway between Fruitridge Road and the Bill Conlin Sports

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

Complex
· Grand Avenue Streetscape and Bicycling Improvements
· Haggin Oaks Golf Shared Use Path
· Kathleen Avenue and Tessa Avenue Walking Improvements · Marysville Boulevard Lane Reduction (south of Arcade Boulevard) · Meadowview Transportation Improvements
· Northwood Elementary Vision Zero Improvements
· Sacramento River Parkway (Little Pocket)
Sacramento communities were also asked if they thought a project should be a lower priority and one project was identified:
· Sacramento River Parkway (Pocket)
The Sacramento River Parkway project in the Pocket area had strong input from different perspectives.

It was noted staff missed three planned efforts:
· Marconi Light Rail Station Technical Background Report (2012) · Snowy Egret Overcrossing
· Highway 99 near Hayground Way Overcrossing
Community members also shared over 50 recommendations for new improvements/projects as well as a need to update the Bicycle Master Plan. Staff will consider these new planning efforts as transportation planning funding opportunities arise.

Based on community feedback staff recommend the following changes to the Transportation Priorities Plan Prioritization.

Inclusion of these projects and plans in the prioritization · Marconi Light Rail Station Technical Background Report (2012) · Snowy Egret Overcrossing
· Hwy 99 near Hayground Way Overcrossing
Staff does not recommend changes to the prioritization of any specific projects. The initial prioritization has been reviewed and staff confirms it aligns with the values Sacramentans shared in Phase 1, and aligns with the City Council adopted criteria.

While staff does not recommend any changes in prioritization for any particular project, staff noted that scoring revealed an issue with shared-use paths. Shared-use paths cannot score well because they cannot receive a score from the “Improving Transportation Safety” category. This category assigns points (12 if a top 10 corridor or 6 if on the high injury network) based on the Vision Zero High Injury Network (HIN) which is on-street only. Shared-use paths are not on-street and cannot score, but provide a low-stress, off street alternative to most of Sacramento’s streets. Based on this, staff recommend including shared use paths with the HIN, assigning them 6 points in this category in the development of the Public Draft Plan.

File ID: 2022-01804 11/15/2022 Discussion Item 35.

The revised Prioritization is shown in Attachment 2 TPP Resolution. Staff seek City Council approval of the Transportation Prioritization Plan Prioritization (as revised) as the City’s guidelines for transportation investment and funding opportunities.

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIZATION PLAN PRIORITIZATION FOR

TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS AND FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

BACKGROUND
A. The City is responsible for maintaining and upgrading an aging transportation network that serves hundreds of thousands of users, including those that drive, take transit, bicycle, walk, and scoot.

B. Resources to maintain and improve the transportation network are very limited.

City Council has approved over 700 transportation plans and projects that are estimated to cost $5 billion. This amount significantly exceeds the amount of funding through local and grant funds that the City can feasibly expect to receive.

C. On March 15, 2022, City Council adopted Prioritization Criteria, Metrics, and Points for Transportation Investments and Funding Opportunities (Resolution No. 2022-0079) as part of the Transportation Priorities Plan.

D. City staff applied the criteria, metrics and points for transportation investments and funding opportunities to the over 700 approved transportation plans and projects and conducted community engagement in August and September 2022.

E. The Transportation Prioritization Plan Prioritization reflects Sacramentans values and Council criteria for transportation investments and funding opportunities.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council directs the Transportation Priorities Plan Prioritization provided in Attachment A to be used as the guiding document for transportation investments and funding in Sacramento.

Table of Contents:

Attachment A-Transportation Prioritization Plan Prioritization PAGE 1 OF 54
Transportation Priorities Plan Prioritization

The following pages show the Transportation Priorities Plan (TPP) Prioritization maps that include a project ID number (TPP ID). The project description can be found using the ID number in the description table that begins on page 8.

PAGE 2 OF 54
TPP Prioritization Maps
8 Figure 1: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (northwest) ### TPP Identification
PAGE 3 OF 54

Figure 2: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (northeast) ### TPP Identification (TPP ID)
PAGE 4 OF 54

Figure 3: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (central)
### TPP Identification (TPP ID)
PAGE 5 OF 54

Figure 4: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (southeast) ### TPP Identification (TPP ID)
PAGE 6 OF 54

Figure 5: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (southwest) ### TPP Identification (TPP ID)
PAGE 7 OF 54

Figure 6: TPP Prioritization Map Sacramento (south)

### TPP Identification (TPP ID)
PAGE 8 OF 54
TPP Priorities Table
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 1 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bridgecross Dr Honor Pkwy Regency Park Cir
Bike Master Plan Lower
1 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Regency Park Cir Honor Pkwy Club Center Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 1 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Salizar Way/Amazon
Way
Regency Park
Cir
Amnest Way Bike Master Plan Lower
1 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Mike Gartrell Cir Honor Pkwy Pete Popovich Ct
Bike Master Plan Lower
1 Pedestrian
Improvements
Install sidewalk Salizar Way Regency Park
Cir
Salizar Way Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
2 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Club Center Dr Kokomo Dr End of Route Bike Master Plan Lower 2 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bowden Square Way Bike Master Plan Lower 3 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Broadway Marina View Dr 32nd St Bike Master Plan Medium 4 Deck Conversion Current Transportation
Projects
I St Jiboom St river/city limits Staff list Medium
6 Broadway Bridge New multi-modal bridge
connecting to West
Sacramento
Broadway Front St West
Sacramento
Sacramento
River Crossings
Alternatives
Study
Regionally
significant
6 Broadway Bridge Transportation
improvements
associated with the
West Broadway Specific
Plan
West Broadway West Broadway
Specific Plan
Regionally
significant
7 24th Street Streetscape Beautification to 24th
Street including center
road median with
landscaping, monument
signage and pavement
treatments/crosswalk
improvements
24th St Meadowview
Rd
Laramore Way 24th Street
Feasibility Study
Lower
8 Mack Road/SR-99
Interchange
improvements
Interchange capacity
increasing, circulation,
and safety
improvements
Mack Road/SR-
99 Interchange
improvements
Regionally
significant
10 Pedestrian Signal Safety
Improvements, Florin
Area
Traffic signal
technology and safety
improvements
Florin Rd Greenhaven Dr Luther Dr SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Funded
PAGE 9 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 11 Meadowview Phase 2 Traffic calming, bike
lanes, improved
pedestrian crossings
Meadowview Rd 24th St Freeport Blvd Meadowview
Complete
Streets Plans
Medium
12 Meadowview Phase 1 Traffic calming, bike
lanes, improved
pedestrian crossings
Meadowview
Complete
Streets Plans
Lower
13 Folsom Blvd between
47th St and 65th lane
reduction
Lane reduction 65th Street
Station Area
Study
Lower
13 Folsom Blvd Add on-street parallel
parking to both sides of
the street.
65th Street
Station Area
Study
Lower
13 Folsom Blvd Enhance sidewalks. 65th Street
Station Area
Study
Lower
13 Folsom Blvd Class 2: Bike Lane Folsom Blvd 57th St 59th St Bike Master Plan Lower 13 Folsom Blvd Class 2: Bike Lane Folsom Blvd 59th St 65th St Bike Master Plan Lower 13 Folsom Blvd Road Diet Folsom Blvd Road Diet Lower 15 Land Park Dr between
13th Ave (S) and
Sutterville Rd lane
reduction
Lane reduction Lower
16 Del Paso Blvd Road Diet Lower
16 Marysville Blvd between
Arcade Blvd and Del
Paso Blvd lane reduction
Lane reduction Lower
17 Truxel Rd lane reduction Lane reduction Medium
19 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Capital Mall City Limit 9th St Bike Master Plan Lower
19 Capitol Mall Lane
Reduction
Lane reduction Capitol Mall 5th St 9th St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
19 Capitol Mall Lane
Reduction
Lane reduction Lower
19 Capitol Mall
Revitalization
Lane reduction,
improved bikeways,
crossing improvements
Capitol Mall 3rd St 9th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
20 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane I 80 EB Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 10 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 20 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
MacArthur St - west of
Pinell St
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
MacArthur St Pinell St west Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
20 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Barbara St and North Ave
- NW Corner
Install sidewalk Barbara St North Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
20 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Dayton St - north of Bell
Ave
Install sidewalk Dayton St Bell Ave Road End Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
21 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 21 E Commerce Way
between N Park Dr and
Del Paso Rd lane
addition
Widen roadway E Commerce Way N Park Dr Del Paso Rd Lower 21 E Commerce Way
between W Elkhorn Blvd
and N Park Dr lane
addition
Widen roadway E Commerce Way W Elkhorn Blvd N Park Dr Lower 22 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Fruitridge Rd Florin Perkins
Rd
S Watt Ave Bike Master Plan Lower
22 Fruitridge Rd between
Florin Perkins Rd and S
Watt Ave lane addition
Widen roadway Lower
23 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Pinell St Bike Master Plan Lower 23 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic Ivy
St - South Ave to Nogales
St
Install sidewalk Ivy St South Ave Nogales St Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
23 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Mahogany St - Verano St
Install sidewalk Mahogany St Verano St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
24 J St Lane Reduction Lane reduction J St 16th St 30th St Central City Specific Plan
Lower
24 J St Streetscape Project Beautification J St 7th St 29th St Central City Specific Plan
Lower
24 J St Transit Investments Transit improvements J St 26th St 30th St Central City Specific Plan
Lower
PAGE 11 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 25 US 50 off-ramp at 65th St
Interchange
Interchange capacity
increasing, circulation,
and safety
improvements
Staff list Regionally
significant
26 Jackrabbit Trail
Bike/Walk Trail
Bikeway Superhighway Big Ideas Medium
27 Niños Parkway
Bike/Walk Trail
Bikeway Superhighway Big Ideas Medium
29 Morrison Creek
Bike/Walk Trail
Bikeway Superhighway Big Ideas High
29 Morrison Creek
Bike/Walk Trail
Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan High
30 Sacramento River
Parkway Bike/Walk Trail
Big 7 Bikeway
Superhighways:

Sacramento River
Parkway connection
35th Ave Zacharias Park Big Ideas High
30 Bike/Walk Trail Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan High
31 T St Bike Lanes Big 7 Urban Core: Close
gaps in bikeway
network
T St 9th St Alhambra Blvd Big Ideas Medium
32 E St Bike Lanes Big 7 Urban Core: Close
gaps in bikeway
network
E St 9th St 35th St Big Ideas Medium
33 2nd Ave signal Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic signal
2nd Ave Big Ideas Lower
34 Stockton at 8th signals Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic signal
Stockton Blvd/8th Ave Big Ideas Lower
35 Riverside at 11th Ave Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Riverside Blvd/11th
Ave
Big Ideas Lower
36 Riverside at Swanston Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Riverside/Swanston Big Ideas Lower
37 Riverside at 2nd Ave Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Riverside/2nd Ave Big Ideas Lower
PAGE 12 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 38 Freeport at 11th Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Freeport/11th Ave Big Ideas Lower
39 Broadway at 2nd/3th Traffic Signal Big Ideas Medium 40 Franklin at 5th Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Franklin/5th Ave Big Ideas Lower
41 26th St - Turn Lane
Removal
Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
26th St Broadway W St Big Ideas Medium
42 Riverside (Broadway to
X)
Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
Riverside Broadway X St Big Ideas Lower
43 Riverside (X to W) Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
Riverside X St W St Big Ideas Lower
44 Alhambra at F St Signal Big 7 Urban Core:

Intersection
improvement for
walking/biking
Alhambra/F St Big Ideas Lower
45 9th St Separate Bikeway Big 7 Urban Core:

Separated bikeway
9th St Broadway F St Big Ideas Lower
45 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
9th St Broadway F St Bike Master Plan Lower
45 9th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
9th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
46 Riverside Blvd Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
Riverside Blvd Broadway 11th Ave Big Ideas Lower
47 35th Ave / S Land Park
Dr
Big 7 Urban Core: 35th Ave Big Ideas Lower
48 McKinley Blvd Traffic
Calming
Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
McKinley Blvd 35th St 40th St Big Ideas Lower
50 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 34th St Stockton Blvd Truckee Way Bike Master Plan Lower 50 Sacramento Charter High
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
34th St V St Y St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
50 Sacramento Charter High
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Y St 34th St 36th St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
51 Urban Core Project Urban Core Project Big Ideas Medium PAGE 13 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 52 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Folsom Blvd Wissemann Dr 1,000 ft south of Watt Ave
Bike Master Plan Medium
52 Folsom Blvd Streetscape
Master Plan
Modify intersections to
improve safety
Folsom
Boulevard
Streetscape
Master Plan
Medium
54 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 59th St S St Broadway Bike Master Plan Lower 54 Streetscape 59th St &
Broadway
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
59th St/Broadway Tahoe Way Broadway Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
55 22nd St Traffic Calming
S
Traffic Calming Big Ideas Lower
56 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Richards Blvd
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Richards Blvd Bercut Dr N 3rd St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
56 Richards Blvd
Beautification
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Richards Blvd Jibboom St 16th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
58 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Muir Way Vallejo Way McClatchy Way
Bike Master Plan Lower
60 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 12th Ave 33rd St 36th St Bike Master Plan Medium 60 12th Ave/14th Ave
Bypass Lane Reduction
Intersection redesign,
improve safety and
conditions for walking
12th Ave 36th St 39th St Martin Luther
King, Jr.

Boulevard
Streetscape and
Urban Design
Master Plan
Medium
62 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Broadway La Solidad Way 43rd St Bike Master Plan Funded 62 VZ Top 5 -
Broadway/Stockton Blvd
Safety improvements,
lane reduction, new
traffic signals, new
pedestrian crossings
VZ Top Vision Zero Top
5 Corridors
Study
Funded
66 San Joaquin Parallel
Parking
Add on-street parking San Joaquin St Redding Ave Business Dr 65th Street Station Area
Study
Medium
PAGE 14 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 66 San Joaquin St Sidewalk
Enhancements
Widen sidewalks San Joaquin St 65th St Redding Ave 65th Street Station Area
Study
Medium
66 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 8th Ave MLK Blvd 65th St Bike Master Plan Medium 66 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route San Joaquin St 65th St Redding Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 70 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 21st Ave Arlington Ave MLK Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 70 21st Ave Gateway Narrow travel lanes,
bikeways, wider
sidewalks, lighting
21st Ave SR-99 Martin Luther
King, Jr.

Boulevard
Streetscape and
Urban Design
Master Plan
Medium
70 21st Ave Improvements Widen sidewalks 21st Ave Franklin Blvd Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd
Martin Luther
King, Jr.

Boulevard
Streetscape and
Urban Design
Master Plan
Medium
74 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 26th Ave 35th St Martin Luther King Jr. Dr
Bike Master Plan Lower
74 St. Hope Public School 7
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Strawberry Ln 26th Ave 27th Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
74 St. Hope Public School 7
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
27th Ave Strawberry
Lane
Martin Luther
King Jr. Blvd
Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
91 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Grandstaff Dr Bamford Dr Alvern Way Bike Master Plan High 91 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Grandstaff Dr Valley Hi Rd Arroyo Vista Dr Bike Master Plan High 91 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Valley Hi Rd Mack Rd Bamford Dr Bike Master Plan High
91 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bruceville Rd Valley Hi Rd Wyndham Dr Bike Master Plan High 91 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bamford Dr Center
Parkway
Hanford Dr Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
High
91 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Grandstaff Dr Bamford Dr Alvern Way Vision Zero School Safety
Study
High
104 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Silver Eagle Rd Mabel St Norwood Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 104 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Hayes Ave Altos Ave Nuevo Park Bike Master Plan Medium 104 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Hayes Ave Taylor St Altos Ave Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 15 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 104 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Silver Eagle Rd Northgate Blvd Norwood Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 125 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Main Ave Raley Blvd Marysville Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 125 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Raley Blvd Ascot Ave Santa Ana Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 125 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Main Ave Bike Master Plan Medium
125 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Main Avenue (West) -
Norwood Ave to Rio
Linda Blvd
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Main Ave Norwood Ave Rio Linda Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
158 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
S Watt Ave Fruitridge Rd Tokay Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 158 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
S Watt Ave Tokay Ln Soth of City
Boundary
Bike Master Plan Lower
162 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Franklin Blvd 2nd Ave Sutterville Rd/12th Ave
Bike Master Plan High
162 Franklin Blvd Complete
St Phase III
Lane reduction, low
stress bikeways,
widened sidewalks
Franklin Blvd 32nd Ave 41st Ave Franklin
Boulevard
Complete Street
Master Plan
High
162 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
19th Ave and 20th Ave -
east of Franklin Blvd
Install sidewalk 19th Ave Franklin Blvd terminus Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
162 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
32nd St and 22nd Ave -
east of Franklin Blvd
Install sidewalk Pedestrian
Improvements
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
170 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Freeport Blvd Meadowview
Rd
Stonecrest
Ave/City
Boundary
Bike Master Plan Medium
172 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Stockton Blvd City Limit Beacon Creek Bike Master Plan Lower 172 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
East Stockton Blvd -
Mack Rd to Hwy99
Install sidewalk East Stockton Blvd Mack Rd SR-99 Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
175 North Segment Stockton
Bus Transit
Transit Stockton Blvd Alhambra Blvd Broadway Big Ideas Medium PAGE 16 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 175 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Stockton Blvd T St Broadway Bike Master Plan Medium
175 Stockton Blvd Mobility
Project
Complete streets and
safety improvements
Stockon Blvd Alhambra Broadway SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Medium
175 Stockton Blvd North
Segment
Complete street
improvements
Stockton Blvd Alhambra Blvd Broadway Stockton
Boulevard
Corridor Plan
Medium
181 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
W Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 E Levee Rd Bike Master Plan Medium 181 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
W Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 Natomas Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 181 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Natomas Blvd W Elkhorn Blvd Mabry Dr Bike Master Plan Medium 181 Elkhorn Blvd between SR‐
99 and E Commerce Way
lane addition
Widen roadway Medium
181 W Elkhorn Blvd between
Natomas Blvd and Rio
Linda Blvd lane addition
Widen roadway Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 E Commerce
Way
Medium
181 Lane Addition W Elkhorn Blvd Lane
Addition
W Elkhorn Blvd E Commerce
Way
Natomas Blvd Medium
181 Elkhorn Blvd between SR‐
99 and E Commerce Way
lane addition
Widen roadway Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 Natomas Blvd North Natomas Plan Unfunded
Schedule 2
Medium
181 W Elkhorn Blvd between
Natomas Blvd and Rio
Linda Blvd lane addition
Widen roadway Elkhorn Blvd SR 99 Natomas Blvd North Natomas Plan Unfunded
Schedule 2
Medium
182 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
183 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
185 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
186 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
187 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
188 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
189 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
PAGE 17 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 190 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
191 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
192 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
193 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
194 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
195 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
196 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
197 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
198 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
199 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
200 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
201 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
202 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
203 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
204 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
204 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 204 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Airport Rd Tanzanite Ave San Juan Rd Bike Master Plan Medium 205 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
205 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Airport Rd Tanzanite Ave San Juan Rd Bike Master Plan Lower 206 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
207 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
208 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
PAGE 18 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 209 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
210 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
211 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
212 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
213 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
214 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
215 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
216 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
217 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
218 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
219 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
220 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
220 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Shady Arbor Ct River Otter Park
W River Dr Bike Master Plan Lower
221 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
222 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
223 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
224 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
225 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
226 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
227 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
PAGE 19 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 228 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Sutters Landing Bridge Bike Master Plan Lower
233 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
234 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
234 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
235 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan High
236 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
237 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
238 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
239 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
240 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan High
241 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
243 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan High
244 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Funded
245 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
246 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
248 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
249 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
250 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
251 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
252 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
PAGE 20 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 253 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
254 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
256 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
258 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
259 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
260 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
261 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
263 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
266 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
267 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
277 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane G Bike Master Plan Lower 277 G St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
G St 7th St 16th St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
278 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane I St 16th St 21st St Bike Master Plan Funded 278 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route I Bike Master Plan Funded 278 I St Lane Reduction Three to two lane
reduction
I St 16th St 12th St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
293 2nd St Realignment Realignment and
potential two-way
conversion of 2nd
Street from O Street to
N Street
2nd St O St N St 2nd Street
Realignment
Medium
293 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
P St 21st St 29th St Bike Master Plan Medium
293 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Q St 21st St 29th St Bike Master Plan Medium
293 P St Lane Reduction Lane reduction P St 5th St 9th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
297 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Broadway Marina View Dr 32nd St Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 21 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 297 Broadway Lane
Reduction
Lane reduction,
bikeways, crossing
improvements
Broadway 9th St SR-99 Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
297 Broadway Transit
Investments
Transit improvements Broadway 19th St 21st St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
297 Broadway Transit
Investments
Transit improvements Broadway 26th St SR-99 NB Off-
ramp
Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
297 Broadway between
Riverside Blvd and
Franklin Blvd lane
reduction
Lane reduction Medium
297 Lower Broadway
Complete St
Lane reduction,
bikeways, crossing
improvements
Broadway 24th St Franklin Blvd Lower Broadway
Complete Street
Medium
305 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane P Bike Master Plan Lower 305 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane P Bike Master Plan Lower 305 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Q Bike Master Plan Lower 305 P St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
P St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
305 P St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
P St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
305 Q St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
Q St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
307 4th St Pedestrian Access Pedestrian crossing
bridge, wayfinding, and
lighting, ADA
improvements
4th St 4th Street
Pedestrian
Access
Medium
307 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 20th St I St J St Bike Master Plan Medium 307 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane K Bike Master Plan Medium 307 20th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 20th St J St K St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
307 Replace Bridge: K St @ K
St at Holiday Garage
Replace bridge Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
309 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
L St 15th St 28th St Bike Master Plan Medium
309 L St Lane Reduction Lane reduction L St 15th St 11th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
309 L St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks L St 3rd St 5th St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
PAGE 22 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 309 L St Streetscape Project Beautification L St 7th St 29th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
309 L St Transit Investments Transit improvements L St 11th St 15th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
312 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route R St 2nd St 15th St Bike Master Plan Medium 312 R St Streetscape Project Complete street and
beautification
improvements
R St 3rd St 10th St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
326 Streetscape 47th Ave
(UPRR to 27th St)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
47th Ave UPRR 27th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
327 H. Allen Hight
Elementary and Natomas
Middle School Vision
Zero Improvements
Bikeway improvements N Park Dr E Commerce
Way
Kokomo Dr Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
327 H. Allen Hight
Elementary and Natomas
Middle School Vision
Zero Improvements
Walking improvements Kokomo Dr Harbor Cove
Way
N Park Dr Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
328 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route E Commerce Way Bike Master Plan Lower 329 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route NATHAN CT Bike Master Plan Lower 330 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route AEROSTAR WAY Bike Master Plan Lower 331 Streetscape Natomas
Crossing Dr Median
Landscaping (Cashaw
Wy to Innovator Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Natomas Crossing Dr Cashaw Way Innovator Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
333 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Jessie Ave - Burgess
Drive to Taylor St
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Jessie Ave Burgess Dr Taylor St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
334 Upgrade Rio Linda
Boulevard - North Ave to
Grand Ave
Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Rio Linda Boulevard -
North Ave to Grand Ave
Rio Linda Blvd North Ave Grand Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
335 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Roanoke Ave - west of
Rio Linda Blvd
Install sidewalk Roanoke Ave Rio Linda Blvd Road End Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
336 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Albatross Wy Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 23 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 336 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Waterford Road -
Yorkshire Road to
Bowling Green Drive
Install sidewalk Waterford Rd Yorkshire Rd Bowling Green Dr
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
336 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Yorkshire Road - Royale
Rd to Bowling Green Dr
Install sidewalk Yorkshire Rd Royale Rd Bowling Green
Dr
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
336 Streetscape Ethan Wy -
West side (Middleberry
Rd to Connie Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Streetscape Ethan Middleberry Rd El Camino Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
336 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Albatross Way and
Woolley Way
Install sidewalk Pedestrian
Improvements
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
336 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Cormorant Way - Silica
Ave to Royale Rd
Install sidewalk Cormorant Way Silica Ave Royale Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
337 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Ethan Way Exposition Blvd Hurley Way Bike Master Plan Lower 337 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Ethan Way El Camino Ave Alta Arden Expressway
Bike Master Plan Lower
337 Streetscape Ethan Wy -
West side (Middleberry
Rd to Connie Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Streetscape Ethan Middleberry Rd El Camino Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
338 Sidewalk on Eldridge Ave
between Del Paso and
Academy Way
Install sidewalk Eldridge Ave Del Paso Rd Academy Way Marconi Light Rail Station Area
Plan
Lower
338 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Kathleen Ave/Tessa Ave
- Del Paso Blvd to
Academy Way
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Kathleen Ave Del Paso Blvd Academy Way Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
PAGE 24 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 338 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Tessa Ave - Del Paso
Blvd to Kathleen Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Tessa Ave Del Paso Blvd Kathleen Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
340 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Taft St - El Camino Ave
to Helena Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Taft St Helena Ave El Camino Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
340 Northwood Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Vision Zero school area
safety improvements
Taft St Helena Ave El Camino Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
341 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Selma St - Frienza Ave to
El Camino Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Selma St Frienza Ave El Camino Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
342 Lampasas Blvd at Rio
Linda Ave Intersection
Safety
Vision Zero intersection
improvement
Lampasas Blvd Rio Linda Blvd SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Funded
344 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Clay St - Dixieanne Ave to
El Camino Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Clay St El Camino Ave Dixieanne Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
345 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Selma St - south of
Dixieanne Ave
Install sidewalk Selma St Dixieanne Ave Road End Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
347 Streetscape Darnel Wy
(Riverside Blvd to end)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Darnel Way Riverside Ave terminus Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
349 Streetscape
Meadowview Rd/Mack
Rd (LRT to Brookfield Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Meadowview Rd/Mack
Rd
LRT Brookfiled Dr Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
PAGE 25 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 350 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Mack Road - Brook
Meadow Dr to Deer
Franklin Blvd Meadow Dr
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Franklin Blvd Brook Meadow
Dr
Franklin Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
351 Center Pkwy between
Mack Rd and Bruceville
Rd lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
353 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Carlin Ave - Stubblefield
Way and Del Vista Cir (n)
Install sidewalk Carlin Way Stubblefield
Way
Del Vista Cir Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
354 Streetscape San Mateo
Wy (Riverside Blvd to
end)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
San Mateo Way Riverside Blvd terminus Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
356 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Arden Way Bike Master Plan High 356 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Auburn Blvd - Plover St to
Marconi Cir
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Auburn Blvd Plover St Marconi Cir Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
356 Streetscape Auburn
Blvd/Roseville Rd (El
Camino Ave to Connie
Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Auburn Blvd/Roseville
Rd
El Camino Ave Connie Dr Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
357 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
San Juan Rd Pony Express
Dr
Tumbleweed
Way
Bike Master Plan Medium
357 Natomas High School
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
intersection
improvements
Fong Ranch Rd Old West Dr San Juan Rd Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
357 Natomas High School
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
intersection
improvements
San Juan Rd Truxel Rd Tumbleweed
Way
Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
358 Streetscape 2nd Ave
(Franklin Blvd to
Alhambra Blvd)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
2nd Ave Franklin Blvd Alhambra Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
PAGE 26 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 359 Bret Harte Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
crossing improvements
7th Ave E Curtis Dr Franklin Blvd Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
359 Bret Harte Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
crossing improvements
Franklin Blvd 7th Ave 9th Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
359 Bret Harte Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Install limited loading
times coupled with
parking enforcement
9th Ave E Curtis Dr 31st St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
360 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 8th Ave 38th St 65th St Bike Master Plan Lower 360 Streetscape 59th St &
Broadway
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
60th St Broadway 8th Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
361 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Monterey Way - Potrero
Way to 27th Ave
Install sidewalk Monterey Way Potrero Way 27th Ave Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
362 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Seamas
Ave/Fruitridge Dr
Riverside Blvd 24th St Bike Master Plan High
362 Fruitridge Blvd Road Diet Traffic safety
improvements, lane
reduction
High
362 Seamas Ave between I‐5
and S Land Park Dr lane
reduction
Lane reduction High
362 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Seamas Ave/Fruitridge
Road - Decliff Cir to
Gilgunn Way
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Seamas
Ave/Fruitridge Dr
Decliff Cir Gilgum St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
362 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
South Land Park Drive -
Noonan Dr to Fruitridge
Rd
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
S Land Park Dr Noonan Dr Fruitridge Rd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
362 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Lonsdale Drive - Seamas
Ave to 34th Ave
Install sidewalk Lonsdale Dr Seamas Ave 34th Ave Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
PAGE 27 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 362 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Noonan Drive - S Land
Park Dr to S Land Park Dr
Install sidewalk Noonan Dr South Land
Park Dr
South Land
Park Dr
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
363 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Ramp Howe Ave La Riviera Dr Bike Master Plan Medium
363 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane American River Dr Commons Dr Howe Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 363 Replace Bridge: Howe
Ave @ American River
(Northbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Replace Bridge: Howe
Ave @ American River
(Southbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Replace Bridge: Howe
Ave @ La Riviera Dr
(Northbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Replace Bridge: Howe
Ave @ La Riviera Drive
(Southbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Replace Bridge: Howe
Ave @ University Avenue
(Northbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Replace Bridge: Howe
AveE @ University
Avenue (Southbound)
Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
363 Streetscape Howe Ave -
Southbound (American
River Dr to American
River Bridge)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Howe Ave American River
Dr
American River
Bridge
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
364 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Roseville Rd Connie Dr Lonview Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 364 Streetscape Auburn
Blvd/Roseville Rd (El
Camino Ave to Connie
Dr)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Auburn Blvd/Roseville
Rd
El Camino Ave Connie Dr Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
365 Replace Bridge: La
Mancha Way @ Elder
Creek
Replace bridge Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
366 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Amherst St Ferran Ave 19th St Bike Master Plan Medium 366 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 21st St Florin Rd Meadowview Rd
Bike Master Plan Medium
366 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Mason Dr 21st St 24th St Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 28 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 366 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Manorside Dr Ferran Ave Monarch Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 366 Capitol Collegiate
Academy Vision Zero
Improvements
Reconstruct corner
curbs to reduce corner
curb radii
Meadowview Rd Lyle St Manorside Dr Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
366 Capitol Collegiate
Academy Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
19th St Meadowview
Rd
Monarch Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
367 Replace Bridge: Franklin
Blvd @ Laguna Creek
Replace bridge Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
368 Cosumnes River Blvd
between Franklin Blvd
and Bruceville Rd lane
addition
Lane reduction Regionally
significant
368 Cosumnes River Blvd Improve safety and
operations
Cosumnes River Blvd Franklin Blvd Bruceville Rd SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Regionally
significant
368 Upgrade Cosumnes River
Boulevard - Bruceville Rd
to Franklin Blvd
Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Cosumnes River
Boulevard - Bruceville
Rd to Franklin Blvd
Consumnes River Blvd Franklin Blvd Bruceville Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Regionally
significant
368 Cosumnes River Blvd
Widening - Franklin Blvd
to Center Parkway
Widen street Cosumnes River Blvd Franklin Blvd Center Parkway
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Regionally
significant
368 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Calvine Road at CRC
Entrance
Install sidewalk Pedestrian
Improvements
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Regionally
significant
369 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Matson Drive - Henrietta
Drive to Sylvia Way
Install sidewalk Matson Dr Henrietta Dr Sylvia Way Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
370 Florin Road Streetscape
(24th St to City Limits)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Florin Rd 24th St City Limits Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Funded
PAGE 29 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 370 Separated bikeway;
travel lane narrowing,
consolidate driveways;
new traffic signals with
pedestrian crossings at
Loma Verde Wy, Serenity
Dr, and Munson Wy
Separated bikeway;
travel lane narrowing,
consolidate driveways;
new traffic signals with
pedestrian crossings at
Loma Verde Wy,
Serenity Dr, and Munson
Wy
Florin Rd 24th St Munson Way Vision Zero Top
5 Corridors
Study
Funded
371 24th St Streetscape Beautification 24th St Meadowview Rd
Laramore Way 24th Street
Feasibility Study
Lower
371 24th St Walking, biking
improvements
24th St Meadowview Florin Rd Meadowview
Complete
Streets Plans
Lower
372 24th St Road Diet Big 7 Urban Core: lane
reduction and bikeways
24th St Sutterville
Bypass
Fruitridge Rd Big Ideas Lower
372 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
24th St Sutterville Rd
Byp
22nd Ave Bike Master Plan Lower
372 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
24th St 26th Ave Murieta Way Bike Master Plan Lower
372 24th St Road Diet Big 7 Urban Core: lane
reduction and bikeways
Lower
372 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Sutterville Bypass - 23rd
St to Attawa Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Sutterville Bypass 23rd St Attawa Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
374 Freeport Blvd Corridor
Study
Safety and complete
streets improvements
Freeport Blvd Fruitridge Rd Blair Freeport Blvd
Corridor Study
High
374 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Freeport Blvd - 35th Ave
to Belleau Wood Lane
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Freeport Blvd 35th Ave Belleau Wood
Lane
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
375 Freeport Blvd Corridor
Study
Safety and complete
streets improvements
Freeport Blvd Sutterville Rd Fruitridge Rd Freeport Blvd Corridor Study
High
375 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
Freeport Blvd - 13th Ave
to Sutterville Rd
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
Freeport Blvd 13th Ave Sutterville Rd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
PAGE 30 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 375 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
Freeport Blvd - Sutterville
Rd to Wentworth Ave
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
Freeport Blvd Sutterville Rd Wentworth Ave Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
378 South Watt Ave Widening
- Elder Creek Rd to
Fruitridge Rd
Roadway widening South Watt Ave Fruitridge Rd Elder Creek Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
381 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 21st Ave Power Inn Rd Granite Park North/South
Bike Bike/Walk
Trail/Florin
Perkin*
Bike Master Plan Lower
381 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 83rd/84th St 24th Ave Fruitridge Rd Bike Master Plan Lower 382 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Florin Perkins Rd Folsom Blvd Jackson Rd Bike Master Plan Medium 382 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Florin Perkins Rd 23rd Ave Fruitridge Rd Bike Master Plan Medium 382 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Florin Perkins Road -
Jackson Hwy to
Belvedere Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Florin Perkins Rd Jackson
Highway
Belvedere Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
383 North Segment Stockton
Bus Transit
Transit Stockton Blvd Fruitridge Rd City Limit Big Ideas High 383 Stockton Blvd South
Segment
Complete streets and
safety improvements
Stockton Blvd Fruitridge Rd City Limit Stockton
Boulevard
Corridor Plan
High
383 Replace Bridge: Stockton
Blvd @ Morrison Creek
Replace bridge Stockton Blvd Morrison Creek Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
383 VZ Top 5 - Stockton Blvd
(S)
Safety improvements,
new bikeways
Stockton Blvd McMahon Way Patterson Way Vision Zero Top 5 Corridors
Study
High
384 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Lemon Hill Ave City Boundary Stockton Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 384 Streetscape Lemon Hill
Ave (Stockton Blvd to
Power Inn Rd)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Lemon Hill Ave Stockton Blvd Power Inn Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
PAGE 31 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 385 Streetscape Elder Creek
Rd (Stockton Blvd to
Power Inn Rd)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Elder Creek Rd Stockton Blvd Power Inn Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
386 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Elder Creek Rd Power Inn Rd S Watt Ave Bike Master Plan High 386 Elder Creek Rd between
Florin Perkins Rd and S
Watt Ave lane addition
Widen roadway Elder Creek Rd Florin Perkins
Rd
S Watt Ave High
386 Streetscape Elder Creek
Rd (Stockton Blvd to
Power Inn Rd)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Elder Creek Rd Stockton Blvd Power Inn Rd Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
386 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Ring Drive - Elder Creek
Road to Rock Creek Way
Install sidewalk Ring Dr Elder Creek Rd Rock Creek
Way
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
387 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route W Railroad Ave 14th Ave 18th Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 387 Streetscape West
Railroad Ave (14th Ave to
18th Ave)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
West Railroad Ave 14th Ave 18th Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
388 14th Ave Extension Extend 14th Ave 14th Ave 14th Ave Extension
Lower
388 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 82nd St 14th Ave Alpine Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 389 Ramona Ave Parallel
Parking
Add on-street parking Ramona Ave Brighton Ave Power Inn Rd 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
389 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Ramona Ave Brighten Ave Ramona Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 389 Ramona Ave Phase II Complete street
improvements
Ramona Ave Brighton Ave Cucamonga
Ave
SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Lower
389 Ramona Ave Extension
(Cucamonga Ave to 14th
Ave)
Complete street
improvements
Ramona Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
390 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Power Inn Road - UPRR
crossing to 21st Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Power Inn Rd UPRR 21st Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
PAGE 32 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 391 West Campus High
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Safety improvements,
lead pedestrian interval
and pedestrian refuge
island
58th St 21st Ave Fruitridge Rd Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
392 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Front St N St Q Streeet Bike Master Plan Lower 392 N St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
N St 3rd St 21st St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
392 N St Streetscape Project Beautification N St 3rd St 10th St Central City Specific Plan
Lower
392 N St between 10th St and
16th St lane reduction
lane reduction
Lane reduction Lower
392 N St Connection to Front
St
Extend N Street N St 3rd St Front St I-5 Riverfront
Reconnection
Project
Lower
392 West Campus High
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Safety improvements,
lead pedestrian interval
and pedestrian refuge
island
Riverfront 2nd St N St I-5 Riverfront
Reconnection
Project
Lower
393 65th Ex between Elder
Creek Rd and Stockton
Blvd lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
393 65th St Streetscape
(Broadway to City Limits)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
65th St Broadway City Limit Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 65th St Parallel Parking Widen street to add on-
street parking
65th St Q St Elvas Ave 65th Street
Station Area
Study
Medium
394 65th St Sidewalk
Enhancements
Widen sidewalks 65th St Elvas Ave 14th Ave 65th Street
Station Area
Study
Medium
394 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
65th St Folsom Blvd 14th Ave Bike Master Plan Medium
394 65th St between 14th
Ave and Fruitridge Rd
lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
394 65th St Widen to 5 lanes from
Hwy 50 to Broadway
65th St SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Medium
PAGE 33 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 394 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
65th St - Q St to 4th Ave
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
65th St Q St 4th Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
65th St - 14th Ave to 18th
Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
65th St 14th Ave 18th Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
65th St - 18th Ave to 21st
Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
65th St 18th Ave 21st Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
65th St - 21st Ave to
Fruitridge Rd
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
65th St 21st Ave Fruitridge Rd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 65th St Streetscape
(Broadway to City Limits)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
65th St Broadway City Limit Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
394 65th St Streetscape
(Folsom Blvd to
Broadway)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
65th St Folsom Blvd Broadway Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
395 K St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks K St 12th St 13th St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
396 Redding Ave Parallel
Parking
Add on-street parking Redding Ave 4th Ave San Joaquin St 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
396 Redding Ave Sidewalk
Enhancements
Widen sidewalks Redding Ave Folsom Blvd 14th Ave 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
397 Q St Parallel Parking Add on-street parking Q St 67th St Redding Ave 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
PAGE 34 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 397 Q St Sidewalk
Enhancements
Widen sidewalks Q St 65th St 69th
St/Redding
Ave
65th Street
Station Area
Study
Lower
397 67th St Extension - Q St
to Elvas Ave
Extend 67th St as a two-
lane with walking and
biking improvements
67th St Q St Elvas Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
397 Q St Improvements -
65th St to Redding Ave
15-ft sidewalks and
Class I shared use path
Q St 65th St Redding Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
398 66th St Parallel Parking Add on-street parking 66th St Elvas Ave Folsom Blvd 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
399 Elvas Ave Sidewalk
Enhancements
Sidewalks Elvas Ave J St Folsom Blvd 65th Street
Station Area
Study
Lower
399 Elvas Ave Parallel
Parking
Add on-street parking Elvas Ave 61st St Folsom Blvd 65th Street Station Area
Study
Lower
399 Elvas Ave between J ST
and Folsom Blvd lane
reduction
Lane reduction Lower
399 Streetscape Elvas Ave
(56th St to 65th St)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Elvas Ave 56th St 65th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
400 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 14th Ave Stockton Blvd Marsalla Ct Bike Master Plan Medium 400 14th Ave between 65th
St and Power Inn Rd lane
addition
Widen Roadway Medium
400 Streetscape 14th Ave
(Stockton Blvd to 65th
St)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
14th Ave Stockton Blvd 65th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
400 Streetscape 60th St &
14th Ave - NE & NW
corners and around
Tallac Shopping Center
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
60th St/14th Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
401 MLK Traffic Calming Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
MLK 8th Ave Fruitridge Rd Big Ideas Medium
PAGE 35 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 401 Martin Luther King Jr.

Blvd Streetscape
Improvements
Beautification Martin Luther King Jr.

Blvd
Broadway Fruitridge Rd Martin Luther
King, Jr.

Boulevard
Streetscape and
Urban Design
Master Plan
Medium
401 Father Keith B. Kinney
Elementary School Vision
Zero Improvements
Curb ramp and curb
radii improvement, new
pedestrian crossings
Martin Luther King Jr.

Blvd
8th Ave 14th Ave/12th
Ave Bypass
Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
401 Oak Ridge Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
intersection
improvements
Martin Luther King Jr.

Blvd
17th Ave 23rd Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Medium
402 North Segment Stockton
Bus Transit
Transit Stockton Blvd Broadway Fruitridge Rd Big Ideas High 402 Stockton Blvd between
Broadway and Fruitridge
Rd lane reduction
Lane reduction High
402 Stockton Blvd mobility
Project
Complete streets and
safety improvements
SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
High
402 Stockton Blvd Central
Segment
Transit facilities,
bikeways, sidewalks
and lane reduction
Stockton Blvd Broadway Fruitridge Rd Stockton
Boulevard
Corridor Plan
High
402 VZ Top 5 -
Broadway/Stockton Blvd
Safety improvements,
lane reduction, new
traffic signals, new
pedestrian crossings
VZ Top Broadway 14th Ave Vision Zero Top
5 Corridors
Study
High
403 I St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks I St 9th St 10th St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
404 Envision Broadway Traffic calming, bike
lanes, improved
pedestrian crossings
Broadway Alhambra Blvd Martin Luther
King Jr. Blvd
Envision
Broadway
High
404 Broadway between
Alhambra Blvd and
Stockton Blvd lane
reduction
Lane reduction High
405 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic 1st
Ave - east of 5th St
Install sidewalk 1st Ave 5th St terminus Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
406 Riverside Blvd Connector
St Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
Riverside Blvd W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
PAGE 36 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 406 3rd St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
3rd St W St X St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
406 6th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
6th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
406 8th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
8th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
406 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
W St - southside from 6th
St to 8th St
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
W St 6th St 8th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
407 H St Transit Investments Transit improvements H St 5th St 8th St Central City Specific Plan
Lower
407 H St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
H St 5th St 16th St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
15th St Bike Master Plan Lower
408 15th St Lane Reduction Lane reduction, safety
improvements,
separated bikeway
15th St G St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 16th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
16th St R St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 16th St Lane Reduction Lane reduction, safety
improvements
16th St X St N St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 16th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
16th St X St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 15th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
15th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
408 15th St between X St and
Broadway lane reduction
Lane reduction, safety
improvements,
separated bikeway
Lower
408 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
15th St and 16th St - W
St to X St
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
15th St W St X St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
408 15th St Streetscape
(between W/X Freeway
to Broadway)
Beautification 15th St W/X St Broadway Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
409 24th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
24th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
411 29th St Pedestrian Gap
Project
Install sidewalk 29th St P St T St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
PAGE 37 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 411 30th St Pedestrian Gap
Project
Install sidewalk 30th St P St T St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
411 R St Signal
Improvements
Install traffic signal R St 29th R Street Signal
Improvements
Medium
411 R St Signal
Improvements
Install traffic signal R St 30th R Street Signal
Improvements
Medium
411 Pedestrian
Improvements: Premium
29th St - Q St to S St
Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and
seating
29th St Q St S St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
412 Sutter Middle School
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Alhambra Blvd I St J St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
412 Sutter Middle School
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
timing improvements
J St Alhambra Blvd 33rd St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
412 Sutter Middle School
Vision Zero
Improvements
School loading and drop
off study and
implementation
I St Alhambra Blvd 33rd St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
413 J St Bike Lanes Big 7 Urban Core: Close
gaps in bikeway
network
J St 9th St Alhambra Blvd Big Ideas Medium
413 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane L Bike Master Plan Medium 413 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route H Bike Master Plan Medium 413 Capitol Ave Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
Capitol Ave 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
413 H St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
H St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
413 J St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
J St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
413 J St Transit Investments Transit improvements J St 26th St 30th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
413 K St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
K St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
413 L St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
L St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
413 L St Lane Reduction L St Alhambra Blvd 29th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
414 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 28th St Bike Master Plan Medium 414 28th St Pedestrian Gap
Project
Install sidewalk 28th St McKinley
Village Way
B St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
PAGE 38 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 414 29th St Pedestrian Gap
Project
Install sidewalk 29th St B St C St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
414 Alhambra Blvd
Pedestrian Gap Project
Walking improvements Alhambra Blvd McKinley
Village Way
B St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
414 E St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
E St 29th St Alhambra Blvd Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
414 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
28th St - north of B St
Install sidewalk 28th St B St terminus Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
415 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 21st St Bike Master Plan Funded 415 21st St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
21st St S St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
415 21st St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 21st St J St S St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
415 21st St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
21st St I St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
416 J St Lane Reduction Lane reduction J St 6th St 9th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St Lane Reduction Lane reduction J St 5th St 6th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks J St 3rd St 5th St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St Streetscape Project Beautification J St 7th St 29th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St Transit Investments Transit improvements J St 3rd St 19th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St Transit Investments Transit improvements J St 26th St 30th St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
416 J St between 7th St and
10th St lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
417 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Sleep Train Arena Del Paso Rd E Commerce Way
Bike Master Plan High
417 20th St Pedestrian Gap
Project
Improve walking
connectivity
20th St R St S St Central City
Specific Plan
High
418 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 19th St Bike Master Plan Funded 418 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 19th St X St Broadway Bike Master Plan Funded 418 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 19th St Bike Master Plan Funded 418 19th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
19th St S St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
PAGE 39 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 418 19th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 19th St J St S St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
418 19th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
19th St H St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
418 19th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
19th St X St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
419 16th St Connector St
Enhancements
Pedestrian connectivity
improvements
16th St Richards Blvd C St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
419 16th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 16th St C St R St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
419 16th St Streetscape - H
St to Richards Blvd
Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk
improvements, adding
on-street parking
16th St H St Richards Blvd SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Medium
419 North 16th St
Streetscape
Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk
improvements, adding
on-street parking
North 16th St C St Richards Blvd Staff list Medium
420 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 15th St Bike Master Plan High 420 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
15th St Bike Master Plan High
420 15th St Lane Reduction Lane reduction, safety
improvements,
separated bikeway
15th St G St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
High
420 15th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 15th St J St R St Central City
Specific Plan
High
420 15th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
15th St D St G St Central City
Specific Plan
High
420 15th St Lane Reduction Lane reduction, safety
improvements,
separated bikeway
High
421 The MET Sacramento
High School Vision Zero
Improvements
Implement parking
program and loading
improvements
V St 8th St 10th St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
421 The MET Sacramento
High School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
crossing, school loading
improvements
8th St V St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
423 William Land Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
pedestrian crossing
improvements
12th St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
PAGE 40 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 425 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
10th St H St Broadway Bike Master Plan Medium
425 10th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 10th St H St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
425 10th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 10th St J St R St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
426 9th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 9th St H St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
426 9th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 9th St J St R St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
426 9th St Transit
Investments
Transit improvements 9th St J St P St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
427 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 8th St P St T St Bike Master Plan Medium 427 8th St Lane Reduction Reduce one travel lane 8th St P St G St Central City Specific Plan
Medium
427 8th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 8th St H St O St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
427 8th St Transit
Investments
Transit improvements 8th St H St P St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
427 8th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two way (two
lanes)
8th St E St G St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
427 8th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two way (two
lanes)
8th St P St T St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
428 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 7th St Bike Master Plan Medium 428 7th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 7th St H St Capitol Mall Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
428 7th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 7th St Capitol Mall O St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
428 7th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
7th St P St T St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
429 6th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 6th St L St Capitol Mall Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
430 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 5th St Bike Master Plan Funded 430 5th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
5th St Victorian Alley Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
430 5th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 5th St L St N St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
430 5th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 5th St I St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
PAGE 41 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 430 5th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
5th St N St W St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
430 5th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
5th St H St J St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
430 5th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
5th St L St N St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
430 5th St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (two
lanes)
5th St W St X St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
431 4th St Pedestrian Access Pedestrian crossing
bridge, wayfinding, and
lighting, ADA
improvements
4th St 4th Street
Pedestrian
Access
Lower
431 4th St Sidewalk
Improvements
Widen sidewalks 4th St L St N St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
432 3rd St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 3rd St I St R St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
432 3rd St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
3rd St L St Capitol Mall Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
432 3rd St Two-Way
Conversion
Convert to two-way (one
lane contra-flow)
3rd St Q St S St Central City
Specific Plan
Lower
433 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 433 Mustard Seed School
Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping,
crossing improvements
Ahern St N 12th St N C St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
434 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan High
434 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Richards Blvd
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Richards Blvd Bercut Dr N 3rd St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
434 Richards Blvd
Beautification
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Richards Blvd 16th St Jibbom St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
436 Terracina Drive Bridge New bridge Terracina Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
438 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Alvoca Way Bike Master Plan Lower PAGE 42 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 440 Gateway Park Blvd
Bridge Widening
Widen bridge Gateway Park Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
442 El Centro Road Widen roadway El Centro North Natomas Plan Unfunded
Schedule 2
Lower
442 Gateway Park Blvd
Bridge Widening
Widen bridge El Centro Rd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
444 Streetscape San Juan Rd
- Southside (El Centro Rd
to Guadalajara Wy)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
San Juan Rd El Centro Rd Guadalajara
Way
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
445 Azevedo Drive
Streetscape
Traffic Calming Azevedo Dr San Juan Rd West El
Camino Ave
Azevedo Drive
Streetscape
Master Plan
Lower
446 W El Camino Ave/I-80
Interchange
Improvements
Interchange capacity
increasing, circulation,
and safety
improvements
W El Camino Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Regionally
significant
447 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Venture Oaks Way Between Willowcreek
Gateway
Center
Bike Master Plan Lower
447 Streetscape Gateway
Oaks Dr (West El Camino
Ave to Garden Highway)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Gateway Oaks Dr West El
Camino Ave
Garden
Highway
Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
448 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Altos Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 448 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Acacia Ave Altos Ave Rio Linda Blvd Bike Master Plan Lower 448 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Rio Linda Blvd Arcade Blvd Acacia Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 448 Replace Bridge: Rio Linda
Blvd @ Hagginwood
Creek
Replace bridge Replace Bridge Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
450 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Northgate Blvd N Market Blvd Rosin Ct Bike Master Plan Regionally significant
450 Northgate Blvd Interchange capacity
increasing, circulation,
and safety
improvements
Northgate Blvd SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Regionally
significant
451 Garden Valley
Elementary School Vision
Zero Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Larchwood Ave Turnstone Dr Beechwood
Way
Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
PAGE 43 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 451 Garden Valley
Elementary School Vision
Zero Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Patio Ave Larchwood Dr Northgate Blvd Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
451 Garden Valley
Elementary School Vision
Zero Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Beechwood Way Turnstone Dr Larchwood Dr Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
452 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
West Silver Eagle Road
and Northgate Blvd - 529
W Silver Eagle Rd to
levee
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Silver Eagle Rd Levee Northgate Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
453 Northgate Blvd Road Diet Lane reduction High
453 Northgate Blvd Mobility
Plan
Complete street
improvements
Northgate Blvd I-80 Del Paso Blvd Northgate
Boulevard
Mobility Plan
High
453 Northgate Blvd
Streetscape Master Plan
Complete street
improvements
Northgate Blvd Rosin Court Arden-Garden
Connector
Northgate
Boulevard
Streetscape
Master Plan
High
453 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Northgate Blvd - Winter
Garden Ave to Tenaya
Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Northgate Blvd Winter Garden
Dr
Tenaya Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
453 Smythe Academy of Arts
and Sciences Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Northgate Blvd Bridgeford Ave Wilson Ave Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
High
454 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Morey Ave - west of
Norwood Ave
Install sidewalk Morey Ave Norwood Ave Western Ave Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
455 Smythe Academy of Arts
and Sciences Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Haggin Ave Northgate Blvd Northglen St Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
Lower
456 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 456 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower PAGE 44 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 456 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Edgewater
Road/Lampasas Ave -
Bay Dr to Grove Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Edgewater
Rd/Lampasas Ave
Bay Dr Grove Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Lower
457 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Western Ave - Santiago
Ave to Redwood Park
Install sidewalk Western Ave Santiago Ave Redwood Park Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
457 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
El Camino Ave (West) -
Altos Ave to Forrest St
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
El Camino Ave Altos Ave Forrest St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
457 VZ Top 5 - El Camino Ave Safety improvements,
new traffic signals, new
pedestrian crossing
El Camino Ave Ueda Parkway Del Paso Blvd Vision Zero Top 5 Corridors
Study
High
459 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Raley Blvd Bell Ave Doolittle St Bike Master Plan High
459 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Marysville Blvd Arcade Creek
Phase II
Bike/Walk Trail
Arcade Blvd Bike Master Plan High
459 Marysville Blvd between
I‐80 and Arcade Blvd
Lane reduction High
459 VZ Top 5 - Marysville
Blvd
Safety improvements,
lane reduction, new
traffic signals, new
pedestrian crossings
Marysville Blvd North Ave Arcade Blvd Vision Zero Top
5 Corridors
Study
High
460 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Grand Ave Marysville Blvd Winters St Bike Master Plan Medium 460 Streetscape Grand Ave
(Marysville Blvd to
Norwood Ave)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Grand Ave Norwood Ave Marysville Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
461 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Norwood Ave I-80 SB/EB
Ramps
Carrol Ave Bike Master Plan High
461 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Norwood Ave - Grace Ave
to Main Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Norwood Ave Main Ave Grace Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
PAGE 45 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 461 Streetscape Norwood
Ave (Fairbanks Ave to
Main Ave)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Norwood Ave Main Ave Fairbanks Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
463 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Rio Linda Blvd City Limit Claire Ave Bike Master Plan High 463 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Rio Linda Boulearvd -
Main Ave to Claire Ave
Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Rio Linda Boulearvd -
Main Ave to Claire Ave
Rio Linda Blvd Main Ave Claire Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
464 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Marysville Blvd - north of
Main Ave/Claire Ave
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Marysville Blvd Rio Linda Blvd Main Ave Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
467 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Southgate Road -
Lochbrae Road to Royal
Oaks Drive
Install sidewalk Southgate Rd Lochbrae Rd Royal Oaks Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
467 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Woodlake Drive -
Canterbury Road to
Royale Oaks Drive
Install sidewalk Woodlake Dr Canterbury Rd Royal Oaks Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
467 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Blackwood St -
Canterbury Rd to
Woodlake Dr
Install sidewalk Blackwood St Canterbury Rd Woodlake Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
468 Pedestrian
Improvements: Upgrade
Arden Way - Beaumont
St to Evergreen St
Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping
and higher quality
street-crossing
treatments
Arden Way Beaumont St Evergreen St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
468 Streetscape Arden Way
(Royal Oaks Dr to
Evergreen St)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Arden Way Royal Oaks Dr Evergreen St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Medium
PAGE 46 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 469 Royal Oaks Drive Parking
Impacts Study
Parking study Royal Oaks Dr North
Sacramento
Community Plan
Lower
470 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 500 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Funded
500 Bell Ave Complete Sts
Rehabilitation
Pedestrian
Improvements
Bell Ave Norwood Ave Rio Linda Blvd Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
Funded
501 12th St between J St and
I St lane reduction
Reduce one travel lane Lower
502 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Funded
503 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
P St 15th St 21st St Bike Master Plan Funded
503 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Q St 14th St 21st St Bike Master Plan Funded
504 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Broadway Marina View Dr 32nd St Bike Master Plan Funded 504 Broadway Bus Stop
Enhancements
Transit improvements Broadway 19th St 20th St Central City Specific Plan
Funded
504 Broadway Lane
Reduction
Lane reduction,
bikeways, crossing
improvements
Broadway 9th St SR-99 Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
504 Broadway Complete Sts Lane reduction,
bikeways, crossing
improvements
Broadway 3rd St 24th St Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
504 Broadway Transit
Investments
Transit improvements Broadway 19th St 21st St Central City Specific Plan
Funded
504 Broadway between
Riverside Blvd and
Franklin Blvd lane
reduction
Lane reduction Funded
505 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 34th St 5th Ave Truckee Way Bike Master Plan Funded 506 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Franklin Blvd 18th Ave 29th Ave Bike Master Plan Funded 506 Franklin Blvd Complete
St Phase I
Lane reduction, low
stress bikeways,
widened sidewalks
Franklin Blvd Sutterville Rd 19th Ave Franklin
Boulevard
Complete Street
Master Plan
Funded
PAGE 47 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 506 Franklin Blvd Complete
St Phase II
Lane reduction, low
stress bikeways,
widened sidewalks
Franklin Blvd 19th Ave 32nd Ave Franklin
Boulevard
Complete Street
Master Plan
Funded
506 Franklin Blvd between
Sutterville Rd and
Fruitridge Rd lane
reduction
Lane reduction Funded
507 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Funded
508 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
10th St Bike Master Plan Funded
508 10th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
10th St W St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Funded
509 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
9th St H St Broadway Bike Master Plan Funded
569 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Standish
Rd/73rd/79th
Fruitridge Rd 21st Ave Bike Master Plan High
569 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Fruitridge Rd City Limit Wilkinson
St/Bradford Dr
Bike Master Plan High
569 Fruitridge Blvd Road Diet Traffic safety
improvements, lane
reduction
Fruitridge Rd Stockton Blvd 65th St High
569 Urban Core Project Staff list High
569 Streetscape Fruitridge Rd
(Stockton Blvd to 65th
St)
Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash
bins, sidewalks,
bikeways
Fruitridge Rd Stockton Blvd 65th St Transportation
Programming
Guide (2014)
High
569 Pedestrian
Improvements: Basic
Lowell St - north of
Fruitridge Rd
Install sidewalk Lowell St Fruitridge Rd Vandenberg Dr Transportation Programming
Guide (2014)
High
569 Earl Warren Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Lane reduction Fruitridge Rd Stockton Blvd Power Inn Rd Vision Zero School Safety
Study
High
569 Earl Warren Elementary
School Vision Zero
Improvements
Signing, striping, traffic
calming improvements
Lowell St Fruitridge Rd Standish Rd Vision Zero
School Safety
Study
High
600 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 13th St P St N St Bike Master Plan Lower 601 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route N St 28th St Folsom Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 602 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Cappucino Way Kelto Way Main Ave Bike Master Plan Lower PAGE 48 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 603 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bell Ave Bollenbacher
Ave
Marysville Blvd Bike Master Plan Lower
604 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Dry Creek Rd City Limit Bell Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 605 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
I 80 EB Arcade creek Longview Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 605 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Watt Ave Longview Dr Auburn Blvd Bike Master Plan Lower 606 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 24th St 2nd Ave Donner Way Bike Master Plan Lower 607 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 33rd St 5th St 12th Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 608 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Perry Ave Stockton Blvd 42nd St Bike Master Plan Lower 608 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 23rd Ave Martin Luther King Jr. Dr
Mendocino
Blvde
Bike Master Plan Lower
609 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 62nd St 21st Ave 40th Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 610 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 58th St 8th Ave 21st Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 611 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 42nd St 2nd Ave City Limit Bike Master Plan Lower 612 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Kiefer Blvd Julliard Dr City Limit Bike Master Plan Lower 613 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Citadel Way Chestnut Hill Dr
Notre Dame Dr Bike Master Plan Lower
613 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Lake Forest Dr Occidental Dr Bennington Way
Bike Master Plan Lower
614 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
35th Ave Park Village St Freeport Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 615 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Fruitridge Rd Franklin Blvd Mendocino
Blvd
Bike Master Plan Lower
616 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 60th Ave Amherst St 20th St Bike Master Plan Lower 616 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 56th Ave 21st St Hogan Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 617 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Pocket Rd Park Riviera Way
Riverside Blvd Bike Master Plan Lower
617 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Park Riviera Way Riverside Blvd Gloria Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 617 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Little River Way Pocket Dr Rush River Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 617 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Durfee Way Windbridge Dr Souza Cir Bike Master Plan Lower 617 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Grand River Dr Sleepy River Way
El Douro Dr Bike Master Plan Lower
618 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Detroit Blvd Meadowview Rd
Deerhaven
Blvd
Bike Master Plan Medium
618 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Deer Lake Dr Mack Rd Valley Hi Rd Bike Master Plan Medium 618 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Valley Hi Dr Deer Lake Dr Franklin Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 49 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 619 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
W Stockton Blvd Kastanis Way Melville Dr Bike Master Plan Lower 620 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 26th St T St Broadway Bike Master Plan Medium 621 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route R St 36th St 37th St aly
Hendricks Aly Bike Master Plan Lower
622 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Front St N St Q Streeet Bike Master Plan Lower 623 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane G St Alhambra 29th St Bike Master Plan Lower 624 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane E St 20th St 15th St Bike Master Plan Lower 625 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Unsworth Ave Florin Perkins Rd
Outfall Cir Bike Master Plan Medium
625 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 88th St Fruitridge Rd terminus Bike Master Plan Medium 625 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bozeman St Fairbanks Ave Morrison Ave Bike Master Plan Medium 626 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route McKinley Village Way 28th St Dullanty Way Bike Master Plan Lower 700 Two Rivers Trails
Bike/Walk Trail
Bikeway Superhighway Big Ideas Medium
700 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
701 American River Crossing:

Truxel Bridge Scenario 3
New bridge Truxel Rd American River
Crossing
Alternatives
Study
Regionally
significant
702 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 702 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 702 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 702 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route N 5th St Richards Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 702 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium 702 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Richards Blvd Sacramento River
Bike/Walk Trail
Jibbom St Bike Master Plan Medium
702 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane River District
Specific Plan
Medium
703 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 703 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 703 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane N B St 12th St 16th St River District Specific Plan
Medium
704 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 50 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bannon St Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 5th St Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane 7th St N B St Railyards Blvd Bike Master Plan Medium 704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bercut Bike Master Plan Medium 704 N 7th St between B St
and F St lane addition
Widen roadway Medium
704 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane River District
Specific Plan
Medium
708 Alhambra 2-way Bikeway 2-way Bikeway Alhambra Big Ideas Lower 727 21st St Traffic Calming N Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming
21st St E St Broadway Big Ideas Lower
727 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route 21st St Bike Master Plan Lower 728 I St Ramp
Reconfiguration (3rd St
Access SVS)
Reconfigure I Street
ramp onto I-5
I St Jiboom St 4th St Staff list Lower
729 Richards Blvd/I-5
Interchange
Richards Blvd/I-5
Interchange
Improvements
Richards Blvd/I-5
Interchange
Staff list Regionally
significant
730 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
16th St Bike Master Plan Medium
730 16th St Connector St
Enhancements
Pedestrian connectivity
improvements
16th St Richards Blvd C St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
730 16th St Connector St
Enhancements
Improve walking
connectivity
16th St R St Broadway Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
730 16th St Lane Reduction Lane reduction, safety
improvements
16th St X St N St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
730 16th St Streetscape
Project
Beautification 16th St C St R St Central City
Specific Plan
Medium
730 16th St between P St and
W St lane reduction
Lane reduction, safety
improvements
Medium
730 16th St Streetscape - H
St to Richards Blvd
Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk
improvements, adding
on-street parking
16th St H St Richards Blvd SACOG

MTP/SCS
Project List
Medium
731 I St Bridge Replacement Replace I Street Bridge "I St Railyar
ds
Blvd"
Jiboom St city limits/river Staff list Regionally
significant

732 14th Ave Extension Extend 14th Ave 14th Ave terminus Florin Perkins Rd
Staff list Lower
PAGE 51 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 740 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor:

Greenhaven Drive north
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Greenhaven Dr 43rd Ave Florin Rd Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
741 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor:

Greenhaven Drive south
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Greenhaven Dr Florin Rd Pocket Rd Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
742 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Pocket
Road east
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Rocket Rd Collins Isle
Lane
Greenhaven Dr Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
743 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Pocket
Road west
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Rocket Rd Riverside Blvd Collins Isle
Lane
Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
744 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor:

Riverside Blvd
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Riverside Blvd Florin Rd Rocket Rd Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
745 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor:

Genevieve Didion School
area
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
746 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Gloria
Dr
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Gloria Dr Florin Rd Rush River Dr Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
747 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Martin
Luther King, Jr. School
area
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
748 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Florin
Rd
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Florin Rd Gloria Dr I-5 Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Medium
749 Pocket Greenhaven
Priority Corridor: Rush
River Dr
Traffic calming and
complete streets
improvements
Rush River Dr Windbridge Dr Greenhaven Dr Pocket
Greenhaven
Transportation
Plan
Lower
758 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 758 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower PAGE 52 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 759 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Lower
760 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 761 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 762 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 762 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 763 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium 764 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Funded 764 Del Paso Blvd between
Marysville Blvd and
Arcade Blvd lane
reduction
Del Paso Blvd Road Diet Funded
766 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 766 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 767 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 767 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Lower
767 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Lower
768 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 769 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 769 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 769 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 770 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 771 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 771 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Lower
772 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 773 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 774 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 775 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 776 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Medium
776 W El Camino Ave
between I‐5 and Truxel
Rd lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
777 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium PAGE 53 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 777 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Medium 777 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Medium
779 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 780 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 780 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Lower
781 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Challenge Way Response Rd Expostion Blvd Bike Master Plan Lower 782 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
782 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Medium
782 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium
783 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 784 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Bike Master Plan Lower 785 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Lower
786 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route F St Elvas Ave H St Bike Master Plan Lower 787 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Medium
787 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Medium
787 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Medium 787 Fair Oaks Blvd between
Howe Ave and Munroe St
lane reduction
Lane reduction Medium
788 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Medium
788 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Medium
789 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 790 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Lower
791 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 792 Separated Bikeway Class 4: Separated
Bikeway
Bike Master Plan Medium
793 Buffered Bike Lane Class 2B: Buffered Bike
Lane
Bike Master Plan Medium
PAGE 54 OF 54
TPP ID Name Description Street From To Plan Prioritization 794 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 795 Bike Route Class 3: Bike Route Bike Master Plan Lower 796 Bike Lane Class 2: Bike Lane Alhambra Blvd Broadway 2nd Ave Bike Master Plan Lower 800 Marconi Ave
undercrossing between
light rail and Mackey
Park
Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Marconi Light
Rail Station Area
Plan
Lower
801 Shared-Use Path Class 1: Shared-Use
Path
Bike Master Plan Medium

City of Sacramento
Transportation Priorities Plan
Phase 2 Community Engagement Summary

September 2022

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 2 o 56 Introduction
Funding for transportation projects almost
exclusively come from state and
federal grant funds, gas taxes, or countywide
transportation sales taxes. Unfortunately, these
funding sources cannot fund all of Sacramento’s
transportation needs.

The Transportation Priorities Plan will identify
which transportation improvements the City
should prioritize.

In Phase 1, the City engaged Sacramento
communities to understand their values for
transportation investment.

Based on the community values, City Council
adopted criteria, metrics and points for evaluating
and prioritizing transportation projects. Those are
presented on the following page.

In Phase 2, the City prioritized the over 700
approved projects based on community values
adopted by City Council and shared with
Sacramento’s communities to gather their input.

Projects that best meet community values are the
high priority projects. Medium priority are projects
that meet some community values but not all.

Lower priority projects do not align well with
community values for transportation investment.

This report summarizes engagement conducted
and community input, and includes:

Engagement ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Noticing the Initial Priorities, Virtual Gathering and Online Tools .............................................................................. 3 Virtual Gatherings .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Road Show ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Community Input on Initial Priorities ................................................................................................................................ 8 Council Adopted Prioritization ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Engagement Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Detailed Community Feedback ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Community Feedback Summary ............................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix A. Comment List ............................................................................................................................................ 16 Appendix B. Initial Priorities Maps ................................................................................................................................ 50

The City estimates it would
cost $5 billion to build
all the transportation
projects identified in plans
created over the last 20
years.

However, the City only has
about $42 million ( mostly
from competitive grants)
each year to make this
happen.

It would take more than
100 years to build what
we currently have planned.

The Transportation
Priorities Plan will identify
priority investments.

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 3 o 56 Engagement
Noticing the Initial Priorities, Virtual Gathering and Online Tools Phase 2 of the Transportation Priorities Plan was focused on asking Sacramento communities for their input on the Initial Priorities, or the outcome of prioritizing the over 700 planned transportation projects. The following is a summary of the notification efforts and strategies implemented to build awareness about the Transportation Priorities Plan and notify community members about the virtual gathering series and online comment opportunities.

Project Website
The City of Sacramento updated the project website to include information about the initial prioritization, and how to engage. The website also included links to “story pages” that provided narrative and maps describing how the projects were prioritized.

Story Pages
The story pages were available in Chinese, English, Hmong, Spanish, and Vietnamese. The pages included the background about Phase 1 as well as the Council adopted criteria, metrics, and points. They also include the Initial Prioritization with maps showing scoring for each metric. For example, the map to the below shows areas of Sacramento that lack basic infrastructure (Equitable Investment).

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 4 o 56 Online Map
An online map with planned projects and their initial prioritization was published. Community members could navigate the map, learn more about planned projects and their initial priority, and write in comments or upvote others comments.

This online map below was available in Chinese, English, Hmong, Spanish, and Vietnamese.

Online News Articles/Blogs
The City published a City Express blog post on August 17, 2022 with information about the Initial Priorities, ways to engage, including the virtual gatherings. The City Express is sent to over 200,000 people.

The following are a sample of additional news articles and blogs published during Phase II:
• https://www.greaterbroadwaydistrict.com/city-of-sacramento-transportation-priorities-plan • https://www.ecosacramento.net/tag/transportation-choices/ • https://sacbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Geard-Up-8-12-2022.pdf

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 5 o 56 Social Media, Direct Calls and Emails
The City and many community organizations posted information about the meetings on social media.

The project team reached out to more than 200 stakeholder groups representing active transportation and mobility advocates, business interests, disadvantaged communities, persons with disabilities, senor organizations, environmental groups and public health organizations, schools, public transit, and neighborhood associations in Sacramento. Through personal phone calls and emails, the project team notified these groups about the upcoming meetings and requested them to share the information to their organization through email newsletters, social media posts, website updates, or other communication links.

The following groups shared information about the Phase 2 of the Transportation Priorities Plan:

1. 350 Sacramento

2. Black Child Legacy

3. City Council District 2

4. City Council District 3

5. City Council District 5

6. City Council District 6

7. City Council District 7

8. City Council District 8

9. Colonial Village Neighborhood Association

10. Del Paso Boulevard Partnership

11. Environmental Council of Sacramento

12. Franklin Boulevard Business District

13. Greater Broadway Partnership

14. Greater Sacramento Urban League

15. House Sacramento

16. La Familia Counseling Center

17. Land Park Community Association

18. League of Women Voters of Sacramento

19. Mangan Park Neighborhood Association

20. Meadowview Neighborhood Association

21. Midtown Association

22. Mission Oaks North Neighborhood
Association

23. Mutual Assistance Network

24. Natomas JIBE

25. North Sacramento Chamber of Commerce

26. Oak Park Neighborhood Association

27. Parkway Estates Neighborhood Association

28. Pocket-Greenhaven Community Association

29. Power Inn Alliance

30. Red, Black and Green Environmental Justice
Coalition

31. Sacramento Area Bicycling Advocates
(SABA)

32. Sacramento Building Healthy Communities
(BHC)

33. Sacramento Black Chamber of Commerce

34. Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

35. Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment
Agency (SHRA)

36. Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce

37. Sacramento Rainbow Chamber of Commerce

38. Sacramento Regional Transit

39. Sacramento Running Association

40. Sacramento Transportation Management
Association

41. Save Sacramento Neighborhoods

42. South Oak Park Neighborhood Association

43. South Pocket Homeowners Association

44. Southeast Village Neighborhood Association

45. Southside Park Neighborhood Association

46. Stockton Boulevard Partnership

47. Tahoe Park Neighborhood Association

48. United Latinos

49. UCP of Sacramento and Northern California
(United Cerebral Palsy)

50. Washington Neighborhood Center

51. WayUp Sacramento

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 6 o 56 Virtual Gatherings
On August 24 and 27, 2022, the City of Sacramento hosted two virtual gathering meetings. The virtual gatherings provided participants with a recap of the Transportation Priorities Plan, an update of what has been done to date, sharing the initial prioritization, and a tutorial on how community members can provide input via the online comment forms and story map. Following a presentation, the project team facilitated a large group discussion where participants asked questions and provided input through the virtual “chat box”.

The project team concluded the meetings by reviewing the project's next steps and plans for future engagement with the draft plan.

A total of 177 community members registered for the two meetings with 78 community members attended the August 24th gathering and 18 attending in the August 27th gathering, for a total of 96 community participants.

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 7 o 56 Road Show
In addition to hosting two virtual meetings, staff took the Initial Prioritization on the road, making presentations to community organizations and neighborhoods.

To help with equitable outcomes, staff tracked which neighborhoods were not participating and focused engagement in these areas.

The team contacted over 85 organizations in areas where responses were low and asked if there were opportunities to present or attend an event. The team was able to engage with the following organizations and events:

1. 350 Sacramento

2. Active Transportation Commission

3. Banana Festival

4. Celebrate Oak Park

5. ECOS (Environmental Council of
Sacramento)

6. Gardenland Northgate Neighborhood
Association

7. Golf Course Terrace Estates Ice Cream
Social

8. Hagginwood Neighborhood Association

9. Meadowview Neighborhood Association

10. National Night Out at Robla Park

11. Neighborhood Development Team
Ambassadors

12. Oaxaca en Sacramento, hosted by the Latino
Center for Art and Culture

13. Royalty Fest

14. Sac Youth Works Health & Job Fair

15. SacMoves

16. Sacramento TMA (Transportation
Management Association)

17. SacRepublic August 17, 2022 Game

18. SacRT Bus Stop Improvement Open House

19. Trades Day

20. United Latinos

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 8 o 56 Community Input on Initial Priorities
This chapter summaries the adopted prioritization criteria, engagement objectives, and a summary of community feedback on the prioritization.

Council Adopted Prioritization
In March 2022 City Council adopted (R2022-0079) the following criteria, metrics and points for prioritizing transportation. These are based on extensive community engagement conducted during Phase 1 of the TPP. A summary of Phase 1 community engagement is on the project website: www.SacTransportation.org These criteria, metrics and points were applied to all planned projects resulting in the Initial Prioritization.

Value & Criteria  Rational & Metric  Points
(60 Max)
Improves Air Quality, Climate,
and Health
We face an existential Climate Emergency that threatens our city, region, state, nation, humanity and the natural world (Reso. 2019-0465); and over 50% of Sacramento’s GHGs come from transportation. Air quality, health and climate change should be drivers for our mobility investments. 12 Supports bicycling  The project contains a bikeway where there are currently none or enhances an existing bikeway.  3
Supports walking  The project includes sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting, street trees, or marked crosswalks.   6
Supports transit or electric
vehicles
The project contains new transit access enchantment (sidewalk or crosswalk to a transit stop, bus lane, signal priority), transit stop improvements, or supports EV charging infrastructure.
3 Provides Equitable Investment
Sacramento acknowledges historical racial inequities and is committed to transparent, deliberate, and actionable solutions that will remedy those inequities, including the impact air quality and climate have on these neighborhoods.
12 Benefits neighborhoods that
lack basic infrastructure
The project is in a neighborhood that lacks basic infrastructure, specifically sidewalks, streetlights, bikeways, trees or traffic signals.    6 Benefits communities that have
been recipients of racism and
bias
The project is in an area that is majority Black, Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, and/or Indigenous. 6
Provides Access to
Destinations
Mobility opens doors to education, economic
opportunity, health, and personal growth. Connections to institutions and places that provide economic, educational, and health benefits should be prioritized.
12 Connects to jobs  Project is in area with high employment density.   4 Connects to schools  The project is within a 1/4 mile of a school.  4 Connects to parks  The project is within a 1/4 mile of a park.  4 Improves Transportation Safety
Sacramento continues to rank as on the worst cites in California for transportation safety based on data from the Office of Traffic Safety. Transportation safety should be a driver for investments. 12 Improves a Vision Zero Top
10 corridor  The project is on the Vision Zero Top 10 corridor.  12 Improves a Vision Zero
HIN street or is a Vision Zero
School Safety Project
The project is on the Vision Zero high injury network, a Vision Zero School Safety Project but not on the top 10.  6
Fixing and Maintains
Transportation System
Sacramento’s transportation infrastructure is in “fair” condition but is predicted to rapidly deteriorate by the end of the decade.  Fixing potholes, repaving streets and maintaining traffic signals supports Sacramentan’s and our economic health.
12 Improves pavement or bridges The project score based on Traffic / Pavement quality ratio or bridge rating. 8 Improves traffic signals   The project includes new or improved signals or signal technology.   4

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 9 o 56 Engagement Objectives
The purpose of the engagement was to share the Initial Priorities and ask:

1. If you disagree with a project’s initial prioritization, what prioritization do you think it should have and why?

2. Are there any projects approved by the City in other previous planning processes but are not currently on the list?

3. Are we missing a transportation need that is not in a City plan? Comments were organized into the following categories:

1. Planned improvements expected to be a higher priority

2. Planned improvements expected to be a lower priority

3. Planned improvements not included in the prioritization

4. Transportation needs not identified in a plan

5. General comments
Staff anticipated input on the prioritization related to the values used to prioritize; however most comments were focused on why a project was or wasn’t important unrelated to values and criteria.

There were 252 comments and 1333 votes on the prioritization.

The majority of input was from the Pocket, Del Paso Blvd, Land Park, South Land Park and Midtown areas of the City.

Detailed Community Feedback
Planned Improvements Expected to be a Higher Priority
The following table summarizes planned improvements that received 10 or more comments or votes expecting a higher priority.

TPP ID Improvement IDs, Names, Short Descriptions Initial Prioritization
Comment
Summary
Up
Votes
TPP_419 16th Street
• SL_29: North 16th St Streetscape Enhancements
(Pedestrian scaled lighting; sidewalk improvements,
adding on-street parking);
• MTP/SCS_3: 16th St Streetscape - H St to Richards
Blvd (Pedestrian scaled lighting; sidewalk
improvements, adding on-street parking);
• CCSP_13: 16th St Connector St Enhancements
(Pedestrian connectivity improvements);
• CCSP_16: 16th St Streetscape Project
(Beautification)
Medium Prioritize
improvements to
this street,
enhance planned
improvements
with separated
bikeway

114
TPP_214 Arcade Creek Shared Use Path
• BMP_1034: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use
Path)
Medium Build the planned
shared use path
60 TPP_54 59th Street Streetscape Improvements
• TPG_190: Streetscape 59th St & Broadway
(Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways);
• BMP_69: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
Lower Widen sidewalks
and bikeways on
overpass
60 City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 10 o 56 TPP ID Improvement IDs, Names, Short Descriptions Initial Prioritization
Comment
Summary
Up
Votes
TPP_399 Elvas Ave near Sacramento State
• 65SSAR_10: Elvas Ave Sidewalk Enhancements
(Sidewalks);
• 65SSAR_9: Elvas Ave Parallel Parking (Add on-street
parking);
• TPG_198: Streetscape Elvas Ave (56th St to 65th St)
(Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways);
• GP40_26: Elvas Ave between J ST and Folsom Blvd
lane reduction (Lane reduction)
Lower Prioritize
improvements to
this street,
enhance planned
improvements
with separated
bikeway and
more crosswalks

25 TPP_11 Meadowview Transportation Improvements Phase
• MVCS_2: Meadowview Phase 2 (Traffic calming,
bike lanes, improved pedestrian crossings)
Medium Improve walking
and biking
conditions
20 TPP_764 Del Paso Rd Safety Project
• BMP_32: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• GP40_40: Del Paso Blvd between Marysville Blvd
and Arcade Blvd lane reduction (Del Paso Blvd Road
Diet)
Funded Support for lane
reduction on
Marysville Blvd,
TPP 16
19 TPP_16 Marysville Blvd Lane Reduction
.• GP40_10: Del Paso Blvd lane reduction (Lane
reduction);
• GP40_16: Marysville Blvd between Arcade Blvd and
Del Paso Blvd lane reduction (Lane reduction)
Lower Improve safety,
slow drivers
18 TPP_338 Kathleen Ave and Tessa Ave Walking Improvements • TPG_129: Pedestrian Improvements: Upgrade
Kathleen Ave/Tessa Ave - Del Paso Blvd to Academy
Way (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled lighting,
landscaping and higher quality street-crossing
treatments);
• TPG_148: Pedestrian Improvements: Upgrade
Tessa Ave - Del Paso Blvd to Kathleen Ave (Wider
sidewalks, pedestrian scaled lighting, landscaping
and higher quality street-crossing treatments)
Lower Build the planned
walking
improvements
17 TPP_460 Grand Ave Streetscape and Bicycling Improvements • TPG_204: Streetscape Grand Ave (Marysville Blvd to
Norwood Ave) (Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs,
trash bins, sidewalks, bikeways);
• BMP_26: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
Medium Build the planned
improvements
15 TPP_245 Sacramento River Parkway (Little Pocket)
• BMP_1067: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use
Path)
Lower Build the planned
improvements
15 TPP_763 Arcade Blvd Bike Lanes
• BMP_525: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
Medium Build the planned
improvements;
Enhance with
separated
bikeway
14 TPP_170 Freeport Blvd Separated Bikeway between Fruitridge Rd and the Bill Conlin Sports Complex
• BMP_584: Separated Bikeway (Class 4: Separated
Bikeway)
Medium Build the planned
improvements

13 City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 11 o 56 TPP ID Improvement IDs, Names, Short Descriptions Initial Prioritization
Comment
Summary
Up
Votes
TPP_404 Envision Broadway in Oak Park
• EB_1: Envision Broadway (Traffic calming, bike
lanes, improved pedestrian crossings);
• GP40_7: Broadway between Alhambra Blvd and
Stockton Blvd lane reduction (Lane reduction)
High Build the planned
improvements

13 TPP_215 Haggin Oaks Golf Shared Use Path
• BMP_1035: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use
Path)
Lower Build the planned
improvements

10 TPP_30 Sacramento River Parkway (Pocket)
• BI_34: Sacramento River Parkway Bike/Walk Trail
(Bikeway Superhighway);
• BMP_1069: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use
Path)
High Build the planned
improvements

10 TPP_340 Northwood Elementary Vision Zero Improvements • TPG_147: Pedestrian Improvements: Upgrade Taft
St - El Camino Ave to Helena Ave (Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled lighting, landscaping and higher
quality street-crossing treatments);
• VZ_SS_23: Northwood Elementary School Vision
Zero Improvements (Vision Zero school area safety
improvements)
Lower Build the planned
improvements;
Add bikeway
10 Planned Improvements Expected to be a Lower Priority The following table summarizes planned improvements that received 10 or more comments or votes expecting a lower priority.

TPP ID Improvement IDs, Names, Short Descriptions Initial Prioritization
Comment
Summary
Up
Votes
TPP_30 Sacramento River Parkway (Pocket)
• BI_34: Sacramento River Parkway Bike/Walk Trail
(Bikeway Superhighway);
• BMP_1069: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use
Path)
High Do not build the
planned
improvements

126

Planned Improvements Not Included in the Prioritization The following table summarizes input from communities about planned improvements that were not included in the Initial Prioritization.

Location Plan Improvements
Arcade Blvd at
Roseville Rd
Marconi Light Rail
Station Technical
Background Report
(2012)

1. Provide a connection under the Marconi Avenue
Overcrossing between the light rail station and Mackey
Park.

2. Reconfigure traffic lanes on the Marconi Avenue
overcrossing to allow for bike lanes and safer pedestrian facilities

3. Construct sidewalks on key streets to provide safe
pedestrian access to the Marconi Station.

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 12 o 56 Location Plan Improvements
Snowy Egret
Overcrossing
Council Resolution
2018-0043 Bicycle
Master Plan

4. Bicycle and pedestrian overcrossing over I-5 between East Commerce Way and El Centro

5. Convert the Gibraltar Street/White Eagle Lane connection between Beretania Way and Windsong Street from a local
street to a paved shared use path.

Hwy 99 near
Hayground Way
Bridge connecting the Northlake community into North Natomas.

Transportation Needs Not Identified in a Plan
Location Community Identified Need Up
Votes
14th Ave (Land Park) Conduct a safety evaluation and develop a plan to slow drivers and improve conditions for walking and bicycling.

Close street to driving
4 17th and 18th Streets
near Broadway
Make these streets one way
Add angled parking
2 18th and R Streets Move light rail stop near to Safeway parking lot to support grocery shopping by transit
0 62nd Street between
McMahon Dr and
Broadway
Install bike lanes 0
American River Parkway
near Costco
Install path entrance at Costco 0
Arden Way between
Oxford St and Del Paso
Blvd
Complete sidewalk 1
Bike lane gaps under
freeways
Provide continuous bike lanes under freeways 1
Capital Ave/Folsom Blvd Close gaps in Folsom Blvd/Capital Ave bike lanes 3 Citywide Provide sidewalks where there are none 0
Consumnes River Blvd
near I-5
Improve safety 0
Del Paso Rd at I-5 Improve walking and biking on overpass and at ramps 4 East Commerce Remove lanes
Add buffered bike lanes
Plant trees
0 Elvas Ave at J St Replace with at grade intersection 0 F St between 7th St and
the River
Open the F St bikeway to provide access to the station and river 0 Florin Rd Provide separated bikeway 2
Folsom Blvd at 39th St Improve safety for those walking and bicycling 0 Freeport Blvd at 14th Ave Provide marked crosswalks on all legs 0 Freeport Blvd at
Freeport/21st
Improve bike detection at signal for left turn, north bound bicycling 1 Freeport Blvd between
13th Ave and Fruitridge
Rd
Narrow street, add trees 0
Garden Highway Provide bikeway connection from Wheelhouse Ave to Sand Cove Park
0 H Street at McKinley
Park
Close gap in bike lane network 4

City of Sacramento TPP: Phase 2 Engagement Summary Page 13 o 56 Location Community Identified Need Up
Votes
Hogan Drive at 54th Ave Install roundabout 0
Hogan Drive at 57th Ave Install roundabout 0
Howe Ave at American
River
Replace bridge and include biking and transit facilities 7 I St near 18th/19th
Streets
Install a contraflow bike lane to serve businesses 4
Jackrabbit Trail at Club
Center Drive
Provide bike/ped bridge over canal to connect housing and retail 0 L Street between Seville
Way and 30th St
Close gap in bike lane 3
La Riviera Dr Provide separated bikeway 2
Land Park Drive Traffic calming
Close gaps in bikeway network
Create a major bike route
2 Land Park Drive at
Sutterville Rd
Install a traffic circle 1
MLK at 12th Ave
Bypass/14th Ave
Intersection improvements, visibility
Improve bikeways
0 Niños Parkway near
Rancho Vista Way
Connect Niños Parkway to Rancho Vista Way to connect to Garden Valley Elementary School.
0 North Sacramento Provide more transit, walking, biking connections to downtown 6 Overpasses Improve biking on overpasses 3
R St bike/ped
overcrossing/ Pioneer
Landing Park
Improve biking access on the grid to this location 1
Railyards Blvd Install buffer on existing bike lane 0
Riverside Blvd near
Markham Way
Install a bike lane 0
Sacramento River
Parkway
Improve access across I-5 4
Sacramento River
Parkway – Old
Sacramento
Access to/from existing parkway needs improvement 1
San Juan Ave at I-80 Install buffered bike lanes 0
Stockton Blvd Install crosswalks within 20-30ft of bus stops 1 Stockton Blvd at 8th Ave Improve connectivity for biking east-west Add bike detection at signal
0 Sutterville Rd between
Freeport Blvd and
Sacramento River
Parkway
Provide dedicated bike lane 7
Transit Improve bus service 0
Truxel at I-80 Improve walking and biking on overpass and at ramps 3 U Street at Hwy 50 Install sound wall 0
Ueda Parkway Provide access from neighborhood streets 0 Watt Ave at La Riviera Dr Improve shared use path connection from the Watt Ave path to the American River Parkway
2 William Land Park Close park streets to driving 1

PAGE 14 OF 56
General Comments
Location Community Identified Need Up
Votes
Bicycle Master Plan Update the Bicycle Master Plan, need in North Natomas 0 DOCO Install bike lanes through 3
East Sacramento Does not have planned improvements 3
Folsom Blvd Improve crossings for bicycling 0
I-5 crossings in North
Natomas
Crossings of I-5 for east west travel 0
Pocket Rd Install separated bikeways 0
Process Don’t ask the public what they want, transportation professionals should educate related to impacts and modes of travel
0 Process Prioritize walking and bicycling, followed by transit, and then driving. 0 Process Need to improve planning for older adults 0
Rush River Dr Install separated bikeway and slow drivers 1 The Grid Plan for no cars 0
Transit Can the City take over transit operations? 0
Truxel Bridge Prohibit cars 0

PAGE 15 OF 56
Community Feedback Summary
The purpose of the engagement was to share the initial priorities and ask:

1. If you disagree with a project’s initial prioritization, what prioritization do you think it should have and why?

2. Are there any projects approved by the City in other previous planning processes but are not currently on the list?

3. Are we missing a transportation need that is not in a City plan? Sacramento’s communities care deeply about transportation and City investments in mobility. They want the City to build the planned transportation improvements and noted the projects listed below should be high priority in addition to the 41 projects that scored as high priority despite not best aligning with community and Council adopted values and criteria.
• 16th Street –revised to include separated bikeway
• Arcade Creek Shared Use Path
• 59th Street Streetscape Improvements
• Elvas Ave near Sacramento State
• Meadowview Transportation Improvements
• Marysville Blvd Lane Reduction (south of Arcade Blvd) • Kathleen Ave and Tessa Ave Walking Improvements
• Grand Ave Streetscape and Bicycling Improvements
• Sacramento River Parkway (Little Pocket)
• Arcade Blvd Bike Lanes
• Freeport Blvd separated bikeway between Fruitridge Rd and the Bill Conlin Sports Complex • Haggin Oaks Golf Shared Use Path
• Northwood Elementary Vision Zero Improvements
The City’s work on engagement for the Initial Priorities also asked if people thought a project should be a lower priority and one project was identified:
• Sacramento River Parkway (Pocket)
The Sacramento River Parkway project in the Pocket had strong input from different perspectives.

It was noted staff missed three planned efforts:
• Marconi Light Rail Station Technical Background Report (2012) • Snowy Egret Overcrossing
• Hwy 99 near Hayground Way Overcrossing
Community members also shared over 50 recommendations for location specific improvements as well as a need to update the Bicycle Master Plan.

All comments received are in Appendix A. Comment List. The Initial Priorities are shown in Appendix B.

Initial Priorities Maps.

PAGE 16 OF 56
Appendix A. Comment List
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_3 • BMP_10029: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Bridge impacts turns W/X into high volume arterial (1) limiting local access from southern neighborhoods to the City Center and , (2) limiting regional access to the Central City off HWY 50 ramps at 10th & 16th st., and (3) increasing safety risk and GHG emissions in an existing high risk zone , (4) in a high concentration of low-income public housing. A W/X
Corridor Transportation Plan from 3rd st. -24th st should qualify for High Priority based on Access, Improved
performance and safety.
2 TPP_4 • SL_32: Deck Conversion (Convert UPRR
upper bridge deck for walking and
bicycling)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Just surprised to see that safe bicycling access to the I St. bridge didn't make the cut. Seems like a potential high return on investment considering there currently are no safe cycle routes to/from west sac.
4 {Original} this project would be huge for a city! it would also be a boon for west sac residents, which makes it a regional priority.
0 TPP_6 • WB_SP_1: Broadway Bridge
(Transportation improvements associated
with the West Broadway Specific Plan);
• SRCS_1: Broadway Bridge (New multi-
modal bridge connecting to West
Sacramento)
This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} W.Sac Broadway Bridge is Regionally Significant 1 TPP_10 • MTP/SCS_12: Pedestrian Signal Safety
Improvements, Florin Area (Traffic signal
technology and safety improvements)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} This should have a protected bikeway. It is a vital connection between Pocket and Meadowview, is hostile for cycling, and the closest alternative routes are an inconvenient distance away.
2 TPP_11 • MVCS_2: Meadowview Phase 2 (Traffic
calming, bike lanes, improved pedestrian
crossings)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} There are no bike lanes along here. Cars are traveling too fast and not accounting for or expecting cyclists. I would go through the neighborhood streets in order to avoid it. 9 {Original} We need safer sidewalks and pedestrian crossings. 11 TPP_15 • GP40_15: Land Park Dr between 13th
Ave (S) and Sutterville Rd lane reduction
(Lane reduction)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} 14th Ave in Land Park is a very dangerous street.

Drivers use it to cut across the park, there are no bike lanes or sidewalks and several dangerous intersections.
{1} This should be turned into a bike and pedestrian only street 4 {Original} Land Park drive is an over-wide collector that now serves as an arterial to the City Center with speeding, heavy traffic and speeding - requiring traffic calming.
2 {Original} Land Park Dr. should be a major bike route connecting the City Center with the Dos Rios Trail serving W.Land Park as a regional destination.
{1} There is no bike lane Northbound Land Park Drive between 13th and 11th ave. This is a very dangerous section to be on a bike with vehicle traffic traveling 30+mph
2 PAGE 17 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} The major intersection of an arterial and a collector has long wait times and should be considered for a traffic circle.
1 TPP_16 • GP40_10: Del Paso Blvd lane reduction
(Lane reduction);
• GP40_16: Marysville Blvd between
Arcade Blvd and Del Paso Blvd lane
reduction (Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} A land reduction and a protected ped/bike lane would be critical to safety and traffic control in this high traffic area
9 {Original} Traffic speed needs to be reduced here.
0 9
TPP_17 • GP40_20: Truxel Rd lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

3 {Original} TRuxel is a major artery into/out of town 3 TPP_19 • BMP_10041: Buffered Bike Lane (Class
2B: Buffered Bike Lane);
• CCSP_69: Capitol Mall Lane Reduction
(Lane reduction);
• TPG_60: Capitol Mall Revitalization
(Lane reduction, improved bikeways,
crossing improvements);
• GP40_21: Capitol Mall lane reduction
(Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Bike lane should be buffered and continued all the way to/through bridge
1 {Original} capitol mall is a low hanging fruit - its hardly used by cars but could be an important gathering space and very useful to a dense downtown
0 TPP_21 • GP40_33: E Commerce Way lane
addition (Widen roadway);
• GP40_41: E Commerce Way between W
Elkhorn Blvd and N Park Dr lane addition
(E Commerce Way between Road Road
Din );
• BMP_33: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} We need protected bike lane and sidewalks/buffers on both sides of E Commerce Way. Vehicles are going over 45mph on this street, and there are no sidewalks to protect pedestrians.
3 {Original} We need protected bike lanes and sidewalks/buffers on E Commerce Way. Currently, there are no sidewalks south of 5301 E Commerce Way on both ways. Vehicles are going over 45mph, and it is very dangerous for anyone to walk south of 5301 E Commerce Way. [TPP_21]
(blank)

PAGE 18 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_26 • BI_35: Jackrabbit Trail Bike/Walk Trail
(Bikeway Superhighway)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Connection from Jackrabbit Trail to Fisherman's Lake Parkway and Bike/Ped bridge over highway 80.
1 TPP_29 • BI_37: Morrison Creek Bike/Walk Trail
(Bikeway Superhighway);
• BMP_1064: Morrison Creek Bike/Walk
Trail (Class 1: Shared-Use Path)
General comment {Original} This is great! 1
TPP_30 • BI_34: Sacramento River Parkway
Bike/Walk Trail (Bikeway Superhighway);
• BMP_1069: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
General comment {Original} This is an exciting project that will advance walking and biking, and healthy living! Huge support!
4 {Original} We have been waiting far too long to complete the Sacramento River Trail. Continuous Class 1 bike trails are a benchmark of cities who prioritize active transportation. {1} This project is recreation. If you're trying to get somewhere in the Pocket there's no reason to ride a bike around it. {2} How will the city make levee property owners whole on their loss in property values ?
The expected loss in property value was estimated by a City of Sacramento study to be 15%-20%.
{3} How will the city protect people who live on the levee from liability if someone is injured on the levee portion of their property ?
{4} My neighor lived here when the levee were open to full public access. He vividly remembers homes regularly being broken into during this period of time.
{5} People who don't live on the levee are in a hurry to have a bike trail built. Folks who live on the levee are woried about getting burgularized. Before the cross levee fences were built and acess to the levee was restricted home break in were very common. How will the city protect levee residents from an expected increase in crime after a bike trail is opened ? {6} Yes, its time we claim our the leeves back. No more handouts to these rich NIMBYs in greenhaven!
4 I expected this project to be a
higher priority

1 {Original} I was under the assumption this was already funded.

Please make this project the top priority!
3 {Original} There are gaps in the Sacramento River Parkway, which, when finished, will provide an incredible zero emission transportation and recreation resource for the community and the region.
0 PAGE 19 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} The Parkway should have the highest priority. As the Bicycle Master Plan has concluded, "Connections to the
American River Parkway and an expansion of the Sacramento River Parkway should be considered as backbone
improvements for a City-wide low stress bicycle network." The completion of the Parkway benefits all users, but is all the more critical for those for whom bicycling is a necessity.

Without a low-stress bicycle network, they must travel on city streets with their accompanying risks. For most to of its length, the Sacramento River Parkway is entirely off road, not even necessitating street crossings. Failure to complete the Sacramento River Parkway will condemn vulnerable users to a choice between risky, on-road routes or not traveling by bicycle at all. [TPP_30]
(blank)

I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} As a citizen of the great city of Sacramento…I would hate to organizationally support the taking of private property for any city/public project. This proposed project would require the city to behave like Putin in Ukraine and force unwilling citizens to give up private property for this project to be successful.

Is it possible that Putin used a Crowdsource tool among his comrades prior to taking private property in Ukraine? Just because a large number of people think it is a good idea to take land from private citizens for a public recreational project, doesn't make it morally right. I believe the citizens of the great city of Sacramento are better than that and I advocate utilizing the myriad of other bike paths (greenbelt) to continue to support the goal of "improv(ing) air quality, climate, and health."

We love to bike on the levee and greenbelt, and realize that there are places we can't ride. There are other transportation issues that should be a much higher priority.
{1} There are two issues to address. One is that you don't specify what property, or how much, would have to be bought by the city, which is important to understand for your claim that the government is acting like Putin in Ukraine.

The other is that an eminent domain taking is not theft, but is an excruciatingly detailed and rigorous legal process that seeks to compensate the property owner.
{2} Isn't this state property?? lmfao
{3} You can't freeze your neighborhood in amber forever. Get over it
{4} Too bad, it aint your property!
{5} Too lame to comment on......
10 PAGE 20 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} As a land owner on this proposed bike trail I WILL NOT agree to sell my easement unless a sign is posted ON MY PROPERTY and throughout the trail that the trail is open from sunrise to sunset ONLY.

This sign must also state that picnicking, camping and alcohol on the trail is
PROHIBITED.
{1} Too bad! The city is gonna take it back, because its no longer yours it’s OURS. We the people of Sacramento have a right to these trails. No more handouts for you!
{2} Sounds reasonable as a minimum to provide enforceable rules and safety for levee residents
{3} The city should look at the signs posted on the Vine Trail in Napa, CA for a template regarding posted rules of use.
{4} Last time I checked you bought a house, not the entire river so boo hoo cry about it the trail's going in
2 {Original} I expect the bike trail plan from Garcia Park to Zacharias Park to be a MUCH lower priority
{1} Btw no one in that stretch of the trail “owns” the levee. If that were the case my taxes shouldn’t pay for them. Bunch of freeloading homeowners.
{2} Get over it, it’s not your land anymore.
{3} Totally agree. And, a bike trail on the levee would become a thoroughfare for the homeless. Safety and security will be compromised.
{4} "WAHHH WAHHH I have to see poor people and the
homeless" thats what u sound like ^
{5} The city is illegally trespassing on private property to survey a future bike trail. They are using the cover of the USACE levee project to do so.
{6} Bike trail plan should not be a priority as private property is involved. Not a traffic or safety issue
{7} Maybe we should get rid of the levees altogether since they are built and maintained with pubic money
10 {Original} In all the city transportation plans there is no money or plans for maintenance, security, trash, parking, access, or signage. The city just wants to remove gates and open up the levee before any planning has been done. They currently actively encourage trespassing on private property along the levee. This parkway would be over 3 miles along the Pocket, by far one of the largest parks in the city. But there is no plan or money for extra park rangers or services. This is a bad idea. 4 PAGE 21 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} The active transportation plan meetings open with a statement acknowledging that Native American's land was taken from them and current city property and parks are located on land seized from these people. This is done before the pledge of allegiance. In the Pocket the highest priority of this ATP is a plan that requires the city to seize property in order to build a parkway. Do they realize their ignorance. {1} Incredible connection
{2} But its the publics right of way! Sorry its the cities land, not yours!
{3} Is this satire? The city making available the top of a flood control levee for active transportation and recreation is the same as colonialists kicking Native Americans off their land? 8 {Original} The pocket greenhaven area has plenty of existing bike routes and wide sidewalks here. Funding should be used more equitably to bring up other communities that have been historically left out.
{1} Boo hoo the poors are nearby!!
{2} Nah yall rich ppl just dont want ppl biking behind your yard! {3} Transportation funds should be used for fixing our roads. {4} Class 1 bike trails are the roads for cyclist and pedestrians.

Not all transportation dollars should go to cars. There are other more environmentally friendly ways to get around than by driving a gas guzzling, killing machine.
29 {Original} There already is a bike trail along the canal {1} Will alcohol be permitting on the bike path ?
{2} There's already roads up the river so why do we need the freeway then? Let's tear down I-5 since we already have a road {3} There are already too many roads for cars, why should be build more.....

This trail is an essential corridor for the cycling and pedestrian community especially around the Little Pocket area where cycling paths are inadequate at best.
15 PAGE 22 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} We do not need more bike lanes. Look what politics did to Florin Rd. at Riverside. It is the worst example of the bike lane and parking possible. The pocket community was a crown jewel until politics designed our parking and bike lanes.

Nobody in their right mind would construct what has been done to Florin rd. at Riverside. The residents as well as the local businesses hate it, but there it is. With the present leadership in pocket, or lack of it, this is what we get, the most screwed up bike lane and parking possible. Our roads are falling apart, We have sink holes on Pocket, and we have wrecked cars in driveways, yet, with our city council member, it is bike trails, bike trails, bike trails, yet the most important elements of our community is in disrepair. When I expressed my displeasure to Council members office, the response was.

If you don't like this, wait till you see what we have planed for Pocket and Riverside. This is not good representation but agenda driven by politics.

{1} Money well spent, we need to focus on projects that will get everyone off their lazy butts. We’ve gotten to comfortable in our cars.
{2} This is not Florin, and the two are not comparable because each exists within its own context.
{3} The city has entered into an agreement with Wood Rodgers, a consulting firm to present an engineering plan and
environmental impact report to the city council. The city is spending $685,000 on this initial project. Our tax dollars should be spent on more important issues instead of appeasing a small percentage of the population that wants to ride their bikes on the levee.
11 PAGE 23 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} What transportation purpose does a bike path AROUND the Pocket area provide? Seems like the city is confusing "transportation" with "recreation".
{1} This "recreational" trail would provide an essential low- stress route. What is low stress? Few or no interactions with cars and trucks. The fact that it might actually provide some nice scenery is a bonus; many essential car routes are also pretty, and the beauty of that scenery doesn't make those recreational roads.
{2} Will this bike trail officially be a park or a trail ? Napa Valley has a bike trail called the Vine Trail. Throughout the trail posted signs state that the trail is open from Sunrise to Sunset. Will signs stating the same be post through this bike path ?
{3} Cope harder
{4} Class 1 bike trails like the River Trail are essential pieces of the cycling transportation network. We spend billions of dollars on special 'freeways' to crisscross our nation where bicyclist and pedestrian are expressly prohibited. Where is the reciprocal piece of infrastructure for non-automotive purposes. 31 {Original} While nice from a recreational standpoint, a levee bike lane through Pocket has little transportation value. The money for this project should be spent elsewhere.
0 {Original} Councilman Jennings has told residents along public and private sections of the levee that he could care less about their safety and security. He has also told residents of the Pocket that he could care less about their safety while walking or biking on public sections of the levee. He has said he would do nothing to protect city owned property along the levee. Why in the world would we believe he or the City would have any plan to provide security to expanded levee access.
6 This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} I thought that there was a plan for a class 1 trail connection from the Sacramento River Trail to the class 1 trail along the canals. If not, this would simply involve opening access of a utility road to bicycle traffic
1 TPP_31 • BI_2: T St Bike Lanes (Big 7 Urban Core:

Close gaps in bikeway network)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} T Street is a major road for biking into the city, as it's safer than any other way. However, the intersection between T and Stockton Blvd is the most dangerous part of the journey.

Updates to this intersection should be part of the Stockton Blvd improvement plan. This should be high priority since it will also help us achieve our vision zero goals.
3 TPP_34 • BI_7: Stockton at 8th signals (Big 7
Urban Core: Traffic signal)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Put crosswalks within 20-30ft of transit stops. [TPP_175, TPP_402, TPP_34, TPP_383]
(blank)
TPP_46 • BI_19: Riverside Blvd (Big 7 Urban Core:

Traffic calming)
General comment {Original} Riverside boulevard is dangerous. High speeds and poor visibility contributed to 2 deaths in the last 10 years.

If/when the Broadway Bridge is built, traffic and speeding will only get worse. Please help. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

PAGE 24 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} More than one person has been killed on Riverside in the past few years. We need traffic calming to keep all safe. I see lots of families walking and biking here, and cars fly down this street at 60 + mph.
1 {Original} Riverside traffic calming and bike lanes should be a High Priority for safety for walk and bike to schools and for better performance as a major arterial for the commute. 5 {Original} Paint a bike lane on Riverside near Broadway and into Land Park to complete the partial bike lane on this very busy road. It's currently very dangerous!! [TPP_46]
(blank)

{Original} Automobiles routinely exceed the speed limit on Riverside Boulevard, heres way to reduce speeding and
encourage safer biking/walking: speed cameras, city can lobby to restart SB 735; restriping to reduce lane width, provide continuous bike lanes in green. Please help with bicycle and pedestrian safety by painting well-marked, consistent bicycle lanes and reducing the width of the travel lane. [TPP_46] (blank)

This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Bike lane on Riverside [TPP_46] (blank)
TPP_54 • TPG_190: Streetscape 59th St &
Broadway (Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash bins, sidewalks,
bikeways);
• BMP_69: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} The highway crossing at 59th Street is dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists trying to get between the
neighborhoods of East Sacramento and Tahoe Park and to the light rail station on 59th Street. Suggest road diet with larger sidewalks and a bike lane over the highway.
60 TPP_60 • BMP_85: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• MLK_2: 12th Ave/14th Ave Bypass Lane
Reduction (Intersection redesign, improve
safety and condtions for walking)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} There are very few safe and comfortable routes for bike to cross 99. 12th/14th has no bike lanes
3 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} need safer bike lanes and general visibility for oncoming traffic from MLK Blvd and 14th ave intersection 0 TPP_70 • BMP_97: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• MLK_3: 21st Ave Gateway (Narrow travel
lanes, bikeways, wider sidewalks,
lighting);
• MLK_4: 21st Ave Improvements (Widen
sidewalks)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Safe options for cyclists and pedestrians to cross Highway 99 are limited in this area. The current conditions at 21st Street are not safe. Neighbors east of Highway 99 will need access to the revitalized Franklin Blvd.
1 TPP_162 • BMP_87: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• FBCSMP_3: Franklin Blvd Complete St
Phase III (Lane reduction, low stress
bikeways, widened sidewalks);
• TPG_77: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic 19th Ave and 20th Ave - east of
Franklin Blvd (Install sidewalk);
• TPG_80: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic 32nd St and 22nd Ave - east of
Franklin Blvd (Install sidewalk)
General comment {Original} I'm glad this is a priority. It will be a challenge if removal of parking on one side is necessary, because
businesses just east at Castro, and businesses just west 2 blocks south of that.
0 I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Crosswalks across Franklin needed to safely cross 0

PAGE 25 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Crosswalk creation across Franklin approved by Engineering and awaiting funding
1 TPP_170 • BMP_584: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This stretch is very dangerous to cyclists. It's the only way to get to the River Parkway from the Meadowview neighborhoods (without crossing an arguably worse section over I-5 onto Pocket Rd). It should be a higher priority. 13 TPP_175 • MTP/SCS_14: Stockon Blvd Mobility
Project (Complete streets and safety
improvements);
• STBL_1: Stockton Blvd North Segment
(Complete street improvements);
• BMP_591: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• BI_39: Stockton Bus Transit (Transit)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This is a very complicated intersection that I was hoping to see prioritized more. You have Stockton and 34th crossing R AND the light rail tracks. It is not only confusing for drivers coming from all directions but dangerous for
pedestrians and cyclists
7 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Put crosswalks within 20-30ft of transit stops. [TPP_175, TPP_402, TPP_34, TPP_383]
(blank)
TPP_188 • BMP_1008: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} High-speed, hostile environment for biking and walking, especially for students that must cross I-5 to get to school. Needs better/safer crossings at freeway ramps.
{1} At the minimum there should be buffered bike lanes here. 4 TPP_191 • BMP_1011: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Jackrabbit Trail needs a crossing at Club Center - Dangerous without it.
5 TPP_197 • BMP_1017: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This location has an existing multi use trail that runs north south and crosses Arena Blvd. There is no signaling and there is a very unsafe crossing at this location. Recently a signal was placed for this trail to the north at Del Paso Road however if you are travelling on this trail and you reach Arena Blvd, you are met with a very unsafe crossing.
7 TPP_206 • BMP_1026: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This is a trail gap in Fisherman's Lake Parkway, that when connected will run south from Del Paso Road all the way downtown and beyond.
1 TPP_207 • BMP_1027: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Pedestrian and bicycle crossing needed to connect east and west sides of North Natomas. Both sides have trails that would very very well used if connected. There are no crossings over the freeways, other than the overpasses that many people are not comfortable using due to high speeds and interactions with cars.
3 TPP_214 • BMP_1034: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

26 PAGE 26 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} Bike lane needed in high opportunity location {1} This is an excellent opportunity to create a safe bicycle corridor to access the North Sacramento Bike Trail! Yes please!
{2} This bike trail connection has been planned for 15+ years and never completed! Completing this would give the
underserved communities of Hagginwood and DPH full access to the entire Sacramento Bike Trail system. This would give us safe corridors of travel for recreation and ability to travel without a gas powered vehicle.
{3} This would be amazing! We could get around on all the Sacramento bike trails if we had this!
{4} YES YES YES!
{5} This would be amazing!
{6} The west side of this trail would be an easy win, it's already a service road. The east side of this would be a total game changer for our community to have a walking trail easy of Marysville along Arcade Creek.
{7} We need a connecting bike trail in this area.
{8} This portion of the bike trail connecting to the main trails west and east of here has been in the plans for so many years! Fund this project, finally!
34 TPP_215 • BMP_1035: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Additional bike access should be created to better enjoy Del Paso Park and Haggin Oaks Park
10 TPP_217 • BMP_1037: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} This needs a protected bike facility and safer ped/bike crossings over freeway ramps.
{1} Cars speed up to enter freeway here, just as walkers and bikers must cross. Safer, protected crossings needed!
{2} There is no safe way for pedestrians and cyclists to cross I80 here
3 TPP_227 • BMP_1047: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This should be higher priority. Completing this would make it significantly easier to bike between midtown and Cal Expo, Arden Fair, Kaiser, etc. Currently it is very inconvenient and/or dangerous to bike between these two locations.
4 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Busses that go to Cal Expo State Fair from other cities, places like from West Sacramento, and Elk Grove. There use to be special busses that ran from 30th Street to the Fair.

That is where the Department of Transportation is. When the zoo leaves you’ll have to coordinate buses that go their school busses for field trips and parking. We need a police force that will help deter the kidnapping of children who have to walk home from bus stops and school. Hire qualified bus drivers for school. Have busses to evacuate people from the areas that flood if it is going to happen. A cheap bus fare from West Sacramento main bus stop at Merkley to Old Sacramento and Macy's /Movie theater. [TPP_227]
(blank)
TPP_228 • BMP_1048: Sutters Landing Bike/Walk
Bridge (Class 1: Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} this project is quite redundant if CalTrans is building a bike bridge on the Cap City Freeway
0 PAGE 27 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_235 • BMP_1057: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
General comment {Original} This path is wonderful, and would allow many people to easily connect to the American River Trail!
1 TPP_237 • BMP_1059: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Access from the Watt Avenue MUP to the ARBT is weak and needs to be improved. Two good pieces of active infrastructure done wrong by a lack of a low-stress connection across and along Riveria.
2 TPP_240 • BMP_1062: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
General comment {Original} This would be very nice. Will it connect to Fruitridge so walkers/bikers can easily get on the path and use it to travel to some of the stores in this area?
0 TPP_243 • BMP_1065: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This should be a higher priority from Meadowview Rd North.
0 I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} There is already good connectivity north south in this area. This strtch north of Sutterville seems like it should be a very low priority if measured by safety. I do like the off street trail south of sutterville as a means of accessing South Sacramento.
{1} I'm confused by this comment, are you suggesting that this proposed off-street path is already open today? Are you talking about the path way over at the american river? I'm confused because I see nothing better on google maps than class II painted bike lanes nearby.
{2} What part of Sutterville seems safe to you?????
2 {Original} This should be a lower priority from Meadowview Rd south until a Botanical Garden is approved as part of the Delta Shores development.
1 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Some of Sacramento and Fair Oaks needs sidewalks that don't have them. Thank you. A car-less walker [TPP_243] (blank)
TPP_244 • BMP_1066: Del Rio Bike/Walk Trail
(Class 1: Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Having a dedicated car-free space for walking and biking should be a priority.
0 TPP_245 • BMP_1067: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

5 {Original} Continuous Class 1 bike trails are a benchmark of cities who prioritize active transportation. The ARBT was a good start but the city has failed to build on that early success and been complacent in subsequent years.
5 {Original} The Little Pocket levee is an obvious existing gap on the Sacramento River levee bike path. This should definitely be a higher priority
4 {Original} This bike path has been fenced off, but it is necessary. I have tried using this before and had to jump on and off the trail, riding in gutters . ultimately, i got a flat on my bicycle. the current situation does NOT encourage
walking/biking.
1 TPP_249 • BMP_1071: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This Class 1 trail is needed to increase the viability of the Del Rio Trail by connecting it to Reichmuth Park
4 PAGE 28 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_250 • BMP_1073: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} There is a need for a connection from Meadowview to Delta Shores. If this section of trail is built prior to roads completed by developers it should also include a connection to Consumnes River Blvd. and the shopping center.
0 TPP_251 • BMP_1074: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} This section of class 1 trail would go no where until the property surrounding it is developed. More emphasis should be placed on making a connection to the Meadowview area.
2 TPP_266 • BMP_1091: Bike/Walk Trail (Class 1:

Shared-Use Path)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Need a good way for bikes to turn off the street/bike lane onto path along river. Currently the view is blocked by the bridge, risking collision with pedestrians in the crosswalk. 1 TPP_293 • 2ST_EXT_1: 2nd St Realignment
(Realignment and potential two-way
conversion of 2nd Street from O Street to
N Street);
• BMP_10023: Buffered Bike Lane (Class
2B: Buffered Bike Lane);
• BMP_10024: Buffered Bike Lane (Class
2B: Buffered Bike Lane);
• CCSP_105: P St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

1 TPP_297 • CCSP_63: Broadway Lane Reduction
(Lane reduction, bikeways, crossing
improvements);
• CCSP_65: Broadway Transit Investments
(Transit improvements);
• CCSP_66: Broadway Transit Investments
(Transit improvements);
• LBCS_1: Lower Broadway Complete
Streets (Lane reduction, bikeways,
crossing improvements);
• BMP_10029: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane);
• GP40_8: Broadway between Riverside
Blvd and Franklin Blvd lane reduction
(Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} improvements on broadway should be continuous, not stopgap
2 TPP_309 • BMP_10022: Buffered Bike Lane (Class
2B: Buffered Bike Lane);
• CCSP_95: L St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction);
• CCSP_96: L St Sidewalk Improvements
(Widen sidewalks);
• CCSP_97: L St Streetscape Project
(Beautification);
• CCSP_98: L St Transit Investments
(Transit improvements)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

7 PAGE 29 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_338 • TPG_129: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Kathleen Ave/Tessa Ave - Del
Paso Blvd to Academy Way (Wider
sidewalks, pedestrian scaled lighting,
landscaping and higher quality street-
crossing treatments);
• TPG_148: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Tessa Ave - Del Paso Blvd to
Kathleen Ave (Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled lighting, landscaping
and higher quality street-crossing
treatments)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Pedestrian improvements needed in these
neighborhoods for safety
17 This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Improvements to the Marconi/BUS80 Overpass 2

{Original} Need Marconi Station Master Plan 6
{Original} Pedestrian Access to Mackey Park 7
TPP_340 • TPG_147: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Taft St - El Camino Ave to Helena
Ave (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping and higher quality
street-crossing treatments);
• VZ_SS_23: Northwood Elementary
School Vision Zero Improvements (Vision
Zero school area safety improvements)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Pedestrian improvements needed for safety in these areas
10 This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Protected bike lane connection needed
{1} This bit of bike lane already exists around Hagginwood Park. This project would extend the existing small section of bike path around the park to connect it to the rest of the bike trail system.
5 TPP_347 • TPG_194: Streetscape Darnel Wy
(Riverside Blvd to end) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} There needs to be much better and safer bike and ped connections to the Sac River bike path across I-5.
4 TPP_351 • GP40_9: Center Pkwy between Mack Rd
and Bruceville Rd lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

1 2
TPP_358 • TPG_188: Streetscape 2nd Ave (Franklin
Blvd to Alhambra Blvd) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} 2nd Ave should be prioritized as a major bike route to safely cross HWY 99
{1} agree. I use this path literally everyday.
{2} awkward for bikes going West on 2nd vs cars wanting to turn right (North) on Franklin. Could really use one of the green bike lanes here to prioritize bikes. Thank you!
4 PAGE 30 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_362 • BMP_579: Buffered Bike Lane (Class 2B:

Buffered Bike Lane);
• TPG_143: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Seamas Ave/Fruitridge Road -
Decliff Cir to Gilgunn Way (Wider
sidewalks, pedestrian scaled lighting,
landscaping and higher quality street-
crossing treatments);
• TPG_145: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade South Land Park Drive - Noonan
Dr to Fruitridge Rd (Wider sidewalks,
pedestrian scaled lighting, landscaping
and higher quality street-crossing
treatments);
• TPG_90: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Lonsdale Drive - Seamas Ave to
34th Ave (Install sidewalk);
• TPG_96: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Noonan Drive - S Land Park Dr to S
Land Park Dr (Install sidewalk);
• GP40_1: Fruitridge Blvd Road Diet (Lane
reduction);
• GP40_18: Seamas Ave between I‐5 and
S Land Park Dr lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
General comment {Original} Bike crossing here is terrifying. Vehicle traffic does not understand how to safely use this intersection, which has too many points of entry. Stop or yield sign at Riverside for westbound traffic would help.
0 {Original} I'm glad to see Freeport and Fruitridge are high priorities. These corridors have so much potential for
walkability and bikeability but are currently extremely dangerous and auto-centric.
4 PAGE 31 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_363 • TPG_167: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
American River (Northbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_168: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
American River (Southbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_169: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
La Riviera Dr (Northbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_170: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
La Riviera Drive (Southbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_171: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
University Ave (Northbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_172: Replace Bridge: Howe Ave @
University Ave (Southbound) (Replace
bridge);
• TPG_205: Streetscape Howe Ave -
Southbound (American River Dr to
American River Bridge) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways);
• BMP_596: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• BMP_62: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} We need protected bike lanes on La Riviera Drive throughout. It is a neighborhood that is extremely popular because of the infrastructure surrounding it. The road leads to CSUS and everything eastward including the midtown area. It could become a biking highway considering it's proximity to the American River Bike Trail. There are lots of opportunities to enjoy nature and affordable living. A protected bike lane running the length of the road could really help this community be a beacon for green living in a "suburban", established, transformative community. It has the potential to be one of the busiest bike lanes. The ARBT could also use some investment so that it could because a super highway for alternative transportation.
2 {Original} If a replacement bridge is being planned for Howe, we should consider using it as an opportunity to better improve transit and bike access up the corridor. Transit only lanes across the river to the Power Inn light rail station for example can improve access to the major shopping center up at Howe and Fair Oaks
7 TPP_372 • TPG_146: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Sutterville Bypass - 23rd St to
Attawa Ave (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian
scaled lighting, landscaping and higher
quality street-crossing treatments);
• BMP_573: Buffered Bike Lane (Class 2B:

Buffered Bike Lane);
• BMP_574: Buffered Bike Lane (Class 2B:

Buffered Bike Lane);
• GP40_4: 24th St between Sutterville Rd
and Fruitridge Rd Lane reduction (Lane
reduction);
• BI_1: 24th St Road Diet (Big 7 Urban
Core:lane reduction and bikeways)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} 24th St between Sutterville and Fruitridge is extremely dangerous, it feels like a highway. Several
businesses on the east side of 24th are essentially cut off from the west side unless you are in a car. This is also a key connector for the Hollywood Park, Carleton Tract, and North City Farms neighborhoods to City College, the City College Light Rail Station, and the Fruitridge Light Rail Station. 3 PAGE 32 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_375 • FBCS_1: Freeport Blvd Corridor Study
(Safety and complete streets
improvements);
• TPG_110: Pedestrian Improvements:

Premium Freeport Blvd - 13th Ave to
Sutterville Rd (Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale lighting, signage, and
seating);
• TPG_111: Pedestrian Improvements:

Premium Freeport Blvd - Sutterville Rd to
Wentworth Ave (Extra-wide sidewalks,
pedestrian scale lighting, signage, and
seating)
General comment {Original} This intersection needs a crosswalk and bike/pedestrian signal. To safely / legally cross otherwise, you are required to go to Fruitridge or Irvin / Harian
2 {Original} This section of Freeport is stuffed with destinations and businesses, and it's great to see it ranked as high priority.

Current automobile speeds here are not friendly to non car users
9 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} This intersection should be made smaller and have trees planted. It is currently incredibly hot and stressful to bike/walk through.
0 TPP_383 • TPG_179: Replace Bridge: Stockton Blvd
@ Morrison Creek (Replace bridge);
• VZ_TC_5: VZ Top 5 - Stockton Blvd (S)
(Safety improvements, new bikeways);
• STBL_3: Stockton Blvd South Segment
(Complete streets and safety
improvements);
• BI_39: Stockton Bus Transit (Transit)
General comment {Original} Stockton Blvd is a major roadway, and should prioritize transit and biking. This would also significantly improve the safety of the street.
1 This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Put crosswalks within 20-30ft of transit stops. [TPP_175, TPP_402, TPP_34, TPP_383]
(blank)
TPP_384 • TPG_207: Streetscape Lemon Hill Ave
(Stockton Blvd to Power Inn Rd)
(Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs,
trash bins, sidewalks, bikeways);
• BMP_138: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} Even if a bike lane is placed on this road, if the road isn't put on a road diet, it will be too unsafe to bike on. Cars already travel at 40 MPH+ on this street even though it connects to several schools.
0 TPP_386 • TPG_197: Streetscape Elder Creek Rd
(Stockton Blvd to Power Inn Rd)
(Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs,
trash bins, sidewalks, bikeways);
• TPG_98: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Ring Drive - Elder Creek Road to
Rock Creek Way (Install sidewalk);
• BMP_568: Buffered Bike Lane (Class 2B:

Buffered Bike Lane);
• GP40_34: Elder Creek Rd lane addition
(Widen roadway)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} Pretty low density out here and automobile
orientated. Even with improvements I don't see many people walking and biking out here.
0 PAGE 33 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_390 • TPG_138: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Power Inn Road - UPRR crossing
to 21st Ave (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian
scaled lighting, landscaping and higher
quality street-crossing treatments)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Create a protected bike lane all the way up Power Inn Rd/Howe Ave and keep the roads to 2-4 lanes only. Speeds are so high, and it makes it extremely dangerous to get to Arden Arcade.
0 TPP_392 • BMP_10042: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane);
• CCSP_100: N St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (two lanes));
• CCSP_99: N St Streetscape Project
(Beautification);
• I5_RRP_1: N St Connection to Front St
(Extend N Street);
• I5_RRP_2: 2nd St to N St (Extend 2nd
Street 2nd Street to N Street on the west
side of I-5);
• GP40_28: N St between 10th St and 16th
St lane reduction lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority

1 PAGE 34 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_394 • 65SSAR_2: 65th St Parallel Parking
(Widen street to add on-street parking);
• 65SSAR_3: 65th St Sidewalk
Enhancements (Widen sidewalks);
• MTP/SCS_5: 65th St (Widen to 5 lanes
from Hwy 50 to Broadway);
• TPG_109: Pedestrian Improvements:

Premium 65th St - Q St to 4th Ave (Extra-
wide sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting,
signage, and seating);
• TPG_115: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade 65th St - 14th Ave to 18th Ave
(Wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping and higher quality
street-crossing treatments);
• TPG_116: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade 65th St - 18th Ave to 21st Ave
(Wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping and higher quality
street-crossing treatments);
• TPG_117: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade 65th St - 21st Ave to Fruitridge
Rd (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian scaled
lighting, landscaping and higher quality
street-crossing treatments);
• TPG_8: 65th St Streetscape (Broadway
to City Limits) (Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash bins, sidewalks,
bikeways);
• TPG_9: 65th St Streetscape (Folsom
Blvd to Broadway) (Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash bins, sidewalks,
bikeways);
• BMP_556: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• GP40_6: 65th St between 14th Ave and
Fruitridge Rd lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
General comment {Original} From Elvas to 4th Ave, 65th needs to be narrowed to two lanes with on-street parking removed. It's next to not only a major light rail station but a major bus hub for the
neighborhood as well as being walking-distance of student housing developments and Sacramento State. Cars should not be the priority under any circumstances, not only is it dangerous as a pedestrian to try to access Target coming from the north but also accessing the transit center from the south. A road diet including traffic calming is extremely necessary.
{1} It's difficult to get to Sac state from the Oak Park/Tahoe Park area. 65th is a fairly direct route with bike lanes, but the existing traffic speeds are very uncomfortable for non car users
10 PAGE 35 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} 65th is a dangerous road, and the entire stretch of it should only be 2 lanes. Currently, the traffic often exceeds 50 MPH. Since this roadway leads to a major transit station (65th/university light rail), we must work towards increasing transit along the street. A bus only lane would significantly improve the safety of the street and reliability of the transit.

This road is close to several lower income neighborhoods, and a bus only lane would encourage transit ridership into
downtown offices. Additionally, it would encourage more students to take transit to the high school with the Ryde SacRT program.

The area near HWY 50 should NOT be expanded since that
would be contrary to the draft Climate Action Plan as it would not reduce VMT (vehicle miles traveled). Instead, it would encourage people to drive more.

Transit should be priority #1 on this corridor, followed by bike lanes (as this can be a major connector to the American river trail if the road were safer)
0 TPP_399 • 65SSAR_10: Elvas Ave Sidewalk
Enhancements (Sidewalks);
• 65SSAR_9: Elvas Ave Parallel Parking
(Add on-street parking);
• TPG_198: Streetscape Elvas Ave (56th St
to 65th St) (Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash bins, sidewalks,
bikeways);
• GP40_26: Elvas Ave between J ST and
Folsom Blvd lane reduction (Lane
reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Elvas is a dangerous car sewer that has no business featuring four car lanes and zero cyclist facilities. The street gives direct access to Sacramento State and the American River Parkway via the Hornet Crossing and it's very dangerous.

There are unmarked crosswalks that no pedestrian feels safe crossing and the unnecessary width of the street makes
drivers feel comfortable speeding at 50+ mph
11 {Original} Exiting the American River Pkwy around Sac State and getting spit out onto Elvas/Folsom with zero safe bike infrastructure is uncool. Please prioritize a protected bike lane from this exit leading back to the grid.
14 TPP_400 • BMP_93: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• TPG_187: Streetscape 14th Ave
(Stockton Blvd to 65th St) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways);
• TPG_191: Streetscape 60th St & 14th
Ave - NE & NW corners and around Tallac
Shopping Center (Landscaping, lighting,
banners/signs, trash bins, sidewalks,
bikeways);
• GP40_31: 14th Ave between 65th St and
Power Inn Rd lane addition (Reduce one
travel lane)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} I like the plan, but this is not a major road for biking, and the traffic is relatively safe currently. A road diet would help traffic, but this should be a lower priority than other improvements.
0 PAGE 36 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_402 • MTP/SCS_14: Stockon Blvd Mobility
Project (Complete streets and safety
improvements);
• VZ_TC_1: VZ Top 5 - Broadway/Stockton
Blvd (Safety improvements, lane
reduction, new traffic signals, new
pedestrian crossings);
• STBL_2: Stockton Blvd Central Segment
(Transit facilities, bikeways, sidewalks
and lane reduction);
• GP40_19: Stockton Blvd between
Broadway and Fruitridge Rd lane
reduction (Lane reduction);
• BI_39: Stockton Bus Transit (Transit)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Put crosswalks within 20-30ft of transit stops. [TPP_175, TPP_402, TPP_34, TPP_383]
(blank)
TPP_404 • EB_1: Envision Broadway (Traffic
calming, bike lanes, improved pedestrian
crossings);
• GP40_7: Broadway between Alhambra
Blvd and Stockton Blvd lane reduction
(Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Bikes crossing a Broadway on 2nd Ave need a way to safely cross while oncoming traffic is halted.
2 {Original} improvements on broadway should be continuous, not stopgap
0 {Original} It has bike lanes and should be priority
{1} The section of Broadway does not need to be 2 lanes in each direction. Suggest road diet with turning lane in the middle
{2} Road diet would improve safety significantly
{3} This is great. Needs improvement.
10 {Original} Key connection between Oak Park and Broadway corridor, and if not improved will leave a gap between
complete street projects in Oak Park and west of 29th St. 1 TPP_406 • CCSP_110: Riverside Blvd Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• CCSP_37: 3rd St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (one lane contra-
flow));
• CCSP_46: 6th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• CCSP_51: 8th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• TPG_114: Pedestrian Improvements:

Premium W St - southside from 6th St to
8th St (Extra-wide sidewalks, pedestrian
scale lighting, signage, and seating)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} All N/S streets in the W/X Corridor need (1) safety (lighting & sidewalk improvements) under the now closed and darkened overpass; and (2) system performance
improvements of N/S access to the City Center from the
southern neighborhoods to avoid predicted gridlock. These projects link and complete High priority and funded projects. 3 PAGE 37 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_408 • CCSP_10: 15th St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction, safety improvements,
separated bikeway);
• CCSP_14: 16th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• CCSP_15: 16th St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction, safety improvements);
• CCSP_17: 16th St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (one lane contra-
flow));
• CCSP_9: 15th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• TPG_107: Pedestrian Improvements:

Premium 15th St and 16th St - W St to X
St (Extra-wide sidewalks, pedestrian scale
lighting, signage, and seating);
• TPG_2: 15th St Streetscape (between
W/X Freeway to Broadway)
(Beautification);
• BMP_10020: Separated Bikeway (Class
4: Separated Bikeway);
• GP40_24: 15th St between X St and
Broadway lane reduction (Lane reduction,
safety improvements, separated bikeway)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Bridge impacts turns W/X into high volume arterial (1) limiting local access from southern neighborhoods to the City Center and , (2) limiting regional access to the Central City off HWY 50 ramps at 10th & 16th st., and (3) increasing safety risk and GHG emissions in an existing high risk zone , (4) in a high concentration of low-income public housing. A W/X
Corridor Transportation Plan from 3rd st. -24th st should qualify for High Priority based on Access, Improved
performance and safety.
5 TPP_412 • VZ_SS_33: Sutter Middle School Vision
Zero Improvements (Signing, striping,
traffic calming improvements);
• VZ_SS_34: Sutter Middle School Vision
Zero Improvements (Signing, striping,
traffic cj ming improvements);
• VZ_SS_35: Sutter Middle School Vision
Zero Improvements (School loading and
drop off study and implementation)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} We need a bike lane instead of on street parking.

There is a nice bike lane until you get to the park, then the cars are allowed to park there. forcing bicyclists out into traffic or on to the side walk
4 PAGE 38 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_416 • CCSP_83: J St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction);
• CCSP_85: J St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction);
• CCSP_87: J St Sidewalk Improvements
(Widen sidewalks);
• CCSP_88: J St Streetscape Project
(Beautification);
• CCSP_89: J St Transit Investments
(Transit improvements);
• CCSP_90: J St Transit Investments
(Transit improvements);
• GP40_27: J St between 7th St and 10th
St lane reduction (Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Disappointed to see J street not being prioritized as it should be. Protected bike lanes and bus lanes should be prioritized here as the main eastbound street through the grid and feels very unsafe to cross as a pedestrian. Drivers behave dangerously and speed through here right off of the I-5 exit ramp and it is an urgent need to reduce car lanes along this street
8 TPP_417 • BMP_10013: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane);
• CCSP_22: 20th St Pedestrian Gap
Project (Improve walking connectivity)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} s street connects a lot of important biz & high density -grocery stores, Ice Blocks. Its a street people mostly avoid but could be a great street. No need for a center turn lane.
0 TPP_419 • SL_29: North 16th St Streetscape
Enhancements (Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk improvements, adding
on-street parking);
• MTP/SCS_3: 16th St Streetscape - H St
to Richards Blvd (Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk improvements, adding
on-street parking);
• CCSP_13: 16th St Connector St
Enhancements (Pedestrian connectivity
improvements);
• CCSP_16: 16th St Streetscape Project
(Beautification)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} I'm really surprised to not see this project prioritized.

I bicycle N. 16th St from C St. to N B St. several times per week and it's incredibly unsafe between the four lanes of traffic speeding to Hwy 160 and the narrow sidewalk tunnel that's often being used as a bathroom or other "private" activities. If the entire streetscape project is too expensive, please remove one of the FOUR lanes of traffic for a two-way protected bicycle lane.
{1} Biking through that tunnel is quite unfun, and the alternative (the street) is dangerous.
{2} I drive my car to pipeworks climbing just to avoid walking or biking through that horrid tunnel
{3} This is a major commuter pathway to the rock climbing gym, the clientele of which would prefer to bike than drive, reducing traffic on 16th street. It is massively dangerous to ride your bike in the 4-lane (essentially) highway, and it is sketchy to bike through the dark and moist tunnel where people are sleeping and doing those private activities another commenter mentioned.
114

PAGE 39 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_430 • CCSP_39: 5th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• CCSP_40: 5th St Sidewalk Improvements
(Widen sidewalks);
• CCSP_41: 5th St Sidewalk Improvements
(Widen sidewalks);
• CCSP_42: 5th St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (two lanes));
• CCSP_43: 5th St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (two lanes));
• CCSP_44: 5th St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (two lanes));
• CCSP_45: 5th St Two-Way Conversion
(Convert to two-way (two lanes));
• BMP_10043: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane)
General comment {Original} I can't tell if this is covered in the description or not, but if 5th remains one-way, it should have bi-directional bike lane options. Leaving this area to get out of downtown is extremely inconvenient for bikes, making Amtrak a poor option for people not trying to drive to close the last mile. Additionally, this area is extremely messy, with poor signage for the freeways that generate confusion for drivers. Getting bikes through here safely should be top of mind for street-level work in this area.
1 TPP_459 • BMP_514: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• BMP_524: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• VZ_TC_4: VZ Top 5 - Marysville Blvd
(Safety improvements, lane reduction,
new traffic signals, new pedestrian
crossings);
• GP40_17: Marysville Blvd between I‐80
and Arcade Blvd (Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} For safety reasons, and to enrich the lives of the community, sidewalks should be seriously considered.

Children walking to school, people walking their dogs or simply taking a leisure stroll have no place but the street to walk. And kids have no sidewalks to congregate and visit or play on. 0 TPP_460 • TPG_204: Streetscape Grand Ave
(Marysville Blvd to Norwood Ave)
(Landscaping, lighting, banners/signs,
trash bins, sidewalks, bikeways);
• BMP_26: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Improvements for safety and ped use are critical in this street
{1} We need lane reduction to make this area safe for
pedestrians and bikes. We also need better bike lanes to make it safe for youth in this area to get around safely.
{2} More bike lanes, but no lane reductions....

{3} We desperately need more bike lanes and safe streets for cars, bikers and walkers.
{4} This would really help kids walking home from Grant.

Definitely need lane reduction and safer walking/bike priorities. 15 TPP_467 • TPG_102: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Southgate Road - Lochbrae Road to
Royal Oaks Drive (Install sidewalk);
• TPG_105: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Woodlake Drive - Canterbury Road
to Royale Oaks Drive (Install sidewalk);
• TPG_83: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Blackwood St - Canterbury Rd to
Woodlake Dr (Install sidewalk)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} There are no significant infrastructure improvements required for bike/ped access other than a sidewalk along the southern border of Woodlake Park. Moreover, adding
additional improvements would not promote the priorities of safety and interconnectivity.
1 PAGE 40 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

{Original} It is not entirely clear why this project is of a higher priority than other projects that will do more to promote interconnectivity and safety, like improving Canterbury Rd. 2 TPP_468 • TPG_118: Pedestrian Improvements:

Upgrade Arden Way - Beaumont St to
Evergreen St (Wider sidewalks, pedestrian
scaled lighting, landscaping and higher
quality street-crossing treatments);
• TPG_192: Streetscape Arden Way (Royal
Oaks Dr to Evergreen St) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} The sidewalks along this portion of Arden way are way below standard. It is impossible for a wheelchair to move along much of this Strech.
2 TPP_504 • CCSP_62: Broadway Bus Stop
Enhancements (Transit improvements);
• CCSP_63: Broadway Lane Reduction
(Lane reduction, bikeways, crossing
improvements);
• CCSP_64: Broadway Complete Streets
(Lane reduction, bikeways, crossing
improvements);
• CCSP_65: Broadway Transit Investments
(Transit improvements);
• BMP_10029: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike
Lane);
• GP40_8: Broadway between Riverside
Blvd and Franklin Blvd lane reduction
(Lane reduction)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} All N/S streets in the W/X Corridor need (1) safety (lighting & sidewalk improvements) under the now closed and darkened overpass; and (2) system performance
improvements of N/S access to the City Center from the
southern neighborhoods to avoid predicted gridlock. These sections link and complete High priority projects.
4 PAGE 41 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_569 • BMP_131: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route);
• BMP_569: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway);
• TPG_202: Streetscape Fruitridge Rd
(Stockton Blvd to 65th St) (Landscaping,
lighting, banners/signs, trash bins,
sidewalks, bikeways);
• TPG_91: Pedestrian Improvements:

Basic Lowell St - north of Fruitridge Rd
(Install sidewalk);
• VZ_SS_10: Earl Warren Elementary
School Vision Zero Improvements (Lane
reduction);
• VZ_SS_9: Earl Warren Elementary School
Vision Zero Improvements (Signing,
striping, traffic calming improvements);
• SL_26: Fruitridge Rehabilitation
(Pavement Rehabilitation and
Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements);
• GP40_1: Fruitridge Blvd Road Diet (Lane
reduction)
General comment {Original} Fruitridge is a major road with several businesses within biking/walking distance, Bel Air, that serve the surrounding neighborhoods . Unfortunately, the road is
extremely dangerous to bike or walk on, and there are few crossing locations, and those locations are not convenient for biking/walking, which means people will cross the street in dangerous locations instead of using the light.

Car traffic must be slowed down (could possibly be cut down to a two lane road for cars), and trees should be planted to increase shade (this would also be in line with the recently released Draft Climate Action Plan).
0 TPP_609 • BMP_130: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route)
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} 62nd is the longest stretch to get from Fruitridge Manor/Tahoe Park to T street safely. The entire stretch should include bike lanes.
0 TPP_610 • BMP_91: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} There should be at least complete bike way to T street. Either 62nd street should have a continuous bike lane, and/or 58th Street. It doesn't make sense that this goes down 11th Ave and around Tahoe park.

Creating a continuous path will encourage more biking from these neighborhoods to downtown. This would also help cut down commuter traffic.
0 TPP_615 • BMP_576: Separated Bikeway (Class 4:

Separated Bikeway)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Crossing 99 without a car feels very dangerous. This needs to be a higher priority
0 {Original} There are few safe routes to cross HWY 99 2 {Original} This is a dangerous, hostile facility for non-motorized users, but is also a critical crossing because safer alternatives are an inconvenient distance away. This should be a higher priority both because it increases connectivity and serves a historically disadvantaged area.
0 TPP_620 • BMP_10045: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} The city should drop all class 3 sharrows from any potential funding unless it includes major street calming improvements
0 PAGE 42 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_730 • MTP/SCS_3: 16th St Streetscape - H St
to Richards Blvd (Pedestrian scaled
lighting; sidewalk improvements, adding
on-street parking);
• CCSP_13: 16th St Connector St
Enhancements (Pedestrian connectivity
improvements);
• GP40_25: 16th St between P St and W St
lane reduction (Lane reduction, safety
improvements);
• CCSP_14: 16th St Connector St
Enhancements (Improve walking
connectivity);
• CCSP_15: 16th St Lane Reduction (Lane
reduction, safety improvements);
• CCSP_16: 16th St Streetscape Project
(Beautification);
• BMP_10021: Separated Bikeway (Class
4: Separated Bikeway)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} 16th street would have seemingly more businesses impacted/improved by the streetscape project than 15th street (labeled highest priority).
0 TPP_745 • PG_6: Pocket Greenhaven Priority
Corridor: Genevieve Didion School area
(Traffic calming and complete streets
improvements)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} safer crosswalks and speed humps are needed for a true vision zero
4 TPP_763 • BMP_525: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane) I expected this project to be a higher priority
{Original} Protected bike path along major traffic corridor needed to access Marconi Transit Light Rail Station
3 {Original} Bike trail access 11
TPP_764 • BMP_32: Bike Lane (Class 2: Bike Lane);
• GP40_40: Del Paso Blvd between
Marysville Blvd and Arcade Blvd lane
reduction (Del Paso Blvd Road Diet)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} We need lane reductions between Del Paso Blvd and Arcade on Marysville to slow traffic.
0 11

{Original} We need lane reductions between El Camino and Marysville Blvd on Del Paso to slow traffic.
8 TPP_769 • BMP_54: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route);
• BMP_56: Morrison Creek Bike/Walk Trail
(Class 2: Bike Lane);
• BMP_57: Class 2: Bike Lane (Class 2:

Bike Lane)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} The Canterbury overpass should be closed to
vehicular traffic and redesignated for active transportation use. There is no way to add bike/ped friendly infrastructure to the overpass. Closing the overpass to vehicular traffic is the lowest cost alternative to assuring that all people needing to cross Hwy. 160 can cross safely with a minimum of disruption to current traffic patterns.
2 TPP_789 • BMP_104: Bike Route (Class 3: Bike
Route)
I expected this project to be a lower
priority
{Original} I love bike lanes everywhere, but what is the end goal in putting bike lanes here? The area is residential and connects to nothing. It cannot serve as an adequate cut-through as no streets connect to Freeport and the part of 24th it does connect to have no additional work planned for them.
0 PAGE 43 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes
TPP_793 • BMP_571: Buffered Bike Lane (Class 2B:

Buffered Bike Lane)
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Oak Park residents need to be able to walk to Curtis Park safely and bicycle commute to locations west. A
continuous route is needed either using the 8th Ave. POC or the 12th Ave. OC.
{1} Shaded and protected areas needed for pedestrians and bicyclists along this route
2 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I would like to see a protected bike lane and slower vehicle speeds on Pocket Road.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I would like to see slower motor vehicle speeds on Rush River Drive and protected bike lanes.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I would like to see slower vehicle speeds and protected bike lanes on this street.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I'm not sure if this is within the purview of this project, but there should be bike lanes through the DOCO area. 3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} There should be intersections earmarked as easy crossings for both directions of Folsom Blvd traffic for cyclists coming to East Sacramento from 2nd (north and south bound) 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} This bridge should not allow cars. Existing bridges are more than adequate for local traffic, and car lanes will make the bridge unnecessarily complex and expensive.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} This intersection is VERY dangerous for pedestrians and bikes
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} How fitting to see that East Sacramento is seeing little to no changes.
3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} The number of housing unit going up in the downtown grid and the fact that huge amounts of office space will never be used again should be a major concern for how we view the downtown grid. We need to plan for getting rid of the automobile altogether. The car is always the problem.
[no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I think this survey process is completely backward.

Instead of asking what the people want, you as the
transportation professionals should be educating the public on why and how things like improving air quality, providing equity and access, improving safety and fixing and maintaining our infrastructure is important to our community and economic health. And that it is important to fund these types of projects to make our lives better. We have become a society of that thinks everything should be free because we don't educate our citizens to understand the relationship between sacrifice and results. You folks know (or should know) what needs to be done. All of these 'values' are the same thing, getting it done correctly and fairly. We really need to be asking what do we want our community to really look like not how do we cut up a shrinking pie. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} Priority should be pedestrians and bicyclists, then light rail. Cars are last. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

PAGE 44 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} Can the city buy the transit agency and not operate it as a business? It nearly gets all its funding subsidized anyways right? Sacramento is so spread out that really biking and transit seem to make the greatest difference. [no_TPP_ID] (blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} I am concerned that opportunities to improve the community for our older adult population have not been
considered. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} The Bikeway Masterplan in North Natomas is outdated and needs to be re-evaluated as the area has
changed and grown rapidly over the last 15+ years. Many projects on the list are either not needed or could be redrawn to create better connections. There are new needs based on travel patterns and new destinations. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
General Comment {Original} In North Natomas there are no east-west trail options, and crossing Hwy 5 is a significant barrier to active travel. Hwy 5 crossings like the proposed Snowy Egret and Natomas Crossing would improve connectivity, reduce
congestion and improve quality of life in this area. [no_TPP_ID] (blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority

0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} A low stress N-S alternative to 24th Street is needed 2

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} All N/S streets in the W/X Corridor need (1) safety (lighting & sidewalk improvements) under the now closed and darkened overpass; and (2) system performance
improvements of N/S access to the City Center from the
southern neighborhoods to avoid predicted gridlock. These projects link and complete High priority and funded projects. 3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Bridge impacts turns W/X into high volume arterial (1) limiting local access from southern neighborhoods to the City Center and , (2) limiting regional access to the Central City off HWY 50 ramps at 10th & 16th st., and (3) increasing safety risk and GHG emissions in an existing high risk zone , (4) in a high concentration of low-income public housing. A W/X
Corridor Transportation Plan from 3rd st. -24th st should qualify for High Priority based on Access, Improved
performance and safety.
3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} CSUS hornet crossing should be more pedestrian friendly along Elvas to encourage more students to bike to/from school.
2 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} lots of residue of crash cars at crosswalk
intersection, hard for people to cross road in a safe location. 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Lots of rocks and broken glass on both sides of Bike lane all along Folsom blvd all the way to howe ave, which has caused accidents were cyclist get cut by glass or rocks. 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} protected bike lane 0

PAGE 45 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Remove one lane, and make it into a two way cycle track like on N12th.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} The road condition of 14th Ave is absolutely terrible.

It has been dug up by utilities so many times it is hardly a solid road surface at all. The area around Tallac Village shopping center is an accident ready to happen. The cross walk at 60th St is hard to see and people generally ignore it. Families use this access to get to Tahoe park and kid from the local schools are often around the stores and eateries in the area. The street is a hazard to cross on foot or on a bicycle with cars speeding by or turning in and out of the shopping areas. 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} The road quality through Oak Park is very poor.

Resurfacing with class 3 marking would make this a great bike facility
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} There are no protected bike lanes connecting the new Northlake master community in Natomas to the greater Natomas region. The Northlake community is isolated by
itself. Can the city please prioritize a protected bike lane over the freeway ramps/overpasses that is safe for families and children to cross over to connect the Northlake community to the greater Natomas area/parks/bike paths. Thank you.
4 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} This should be a light rail pedestrian and bike only crossing. The city should prioritize people over cars. We don’t need more cars entering the city center. We need more ways for people to get in and out.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Unsure if gap remains because it's county property on one side but this a key east/west connection that is direct and doesn't need to traverse broken up residential streets. 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} We need better connections from the grid to east sac and oakpark.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} College Greens is a high ridership station in a very low-income neighborhood with poor pedestrian and cyclist access. Folsom Blvd is a dangerous stroad with high-speed traffic and zero traffic calming facilities. Many pedestrians are forced to jaywalk in treacherous conditions to reach the housing and retail just across the street and they deserve better access.
9 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Ninos Parkway needs connection to Jedediah Smith Trail
{1} Ninos Parkway appears to stand alone. I have
biked/walked Ninos Parkway but have to cross San Juan and West El Camino to make connections. I have not found a way to connect to American River Parkway
4 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Need serious traffic calming around freeway ramps for this to ever be bikeable. This is a critical connection for South Natomas.
0 PAGE 46 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} We need more bike lanes in this area, safer travel for bikers and pedestrians.
0 17

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} For safety reasons, all vegetation should be removed along the street as many people turn onto Albany and do NOT have a clear view of oncoming traffic.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} Waterman between Poinsettia and Waterman needs to be built out.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
I expected this project to be a
higher priority
{Original} We need the sidewalks on Del Paso Blvd between Diggs Park Dr and the east end of O'Farrell Blvd and on both sides of Pendleton St. and around to Craigmont and Kenwood Sts. The area is dangerous and needs physical barriers to prevent traffic and pedestrian fatalities.
5 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Accessing the Sacramento River Parkway from
Sutterville Road is currently very dangerous. The existing bike infrastructure meanders between a narrow
unprotected/unbuffered lane and the sidewalk. Once
Sutterville Road reaches the interstate there are cars entering and exiting the freeway with no protection for cyclists. I love that we have a trail right next to the river, but if it's difficult to access no one will use it!
7 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} As a general comment, there are many areas where the City has bike lanes that end or disappear under the freeway, like H St here: this very short break in connectivity would likely be very low cost to patch, but doing so could make a big difference in encouraging commuting from East Sac to Downtown.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Bike connectivity from Wheelhouse Ave to Sand Cove
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Buffered bike lanes on San Juan over I-80. Bridge is already exceptionally wide, just need new paint.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Capitol Ave is one of the most important bike corridors from East Sac to Downtown. The bike lane
disappears under the freeway, creating a tiny but crucial break in the path. Crossing over the freeway is one of the most intimidating aspects of bike commuting, so putting in place a small one-block lane would make a crucial difference. Longer- term, other small bike lane segments making Capitol to
Folsom a continuous bike lane would make a great travel corridor that I think would be heavily used.
3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} contra-flow bike lane would be very helpful here, where Ace Hardware, the Bike Kitchen, and several other businesses serve residents in all directions, to the east and to the west.
4 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Cosumnes River Blvd is frightening and terrible. The city needs to make a plan now before people move in and have to start navigating this terrible stroad
0 PAGE 47 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} E Commerce needs lane reduction/buffered bike lanes. Capacity is way too high = traffic is way too fast. Also please plant some trees
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} F Street bike path should continue through to 2nd St.

This would be best and safest route westbound to Sacramento River. Unused paving exists, just need to open gates.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Folsom Blvd is still not safe for bikes or walkers. It needs major improvements.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Levee bike trail on freeway side from Airport Rd to Natomas Marketplace
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Make 17th one-way north and 18th one-way south adding diagonal parking for Broadway’s Complete Street
revitalization.
2 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Move Light Rail stop TO Safeway parking lot, to make it easier for people to transport groceries
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Need a crosswalk here--between the existing MUP and the proposed path--that is protected by curb extensions and a median island.
2 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Need an entrance from the American River Bike Trail to the Costco parking lot, so bikes can get in, without having to go around on car-roads
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Ninos Parkway extension should connect to Rancho Vista/Garden Valley School
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} No way for bikes taking the overpass from Pioneer Landing Park to reach bike lanes on the grid without merging through traffic on streets without designated bike lanes. 1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} North Sacramento needs more safe, non Single Occ Vehicle Connections into downtown
6 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Railyards Blvd bike path needs buffer. Traffic is too fast.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} remove elvas "interchange" with "offramps" and replace with an at-grade signalized intersection
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Sound wall on U Street as it dead ends into highway

50. Cars has flown off US 50 onto our street. This is a safety hazard.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Speeding 0

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} The 8th/9th Avenue jog is the best east west bike connection south of 2nd avenue, but this intersection was not designed with bikes in mind. East west bikes are blocked from going through and have to weave around the bollards to get through. Stopping the cars further back and daylighting the intersection more would help immeasurably. Also automatic road detection for E/W travel
0 PAGE 48 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} The bike lane disappears just before the freeway. To encourage active transportation by commuters from East Sac to Downtown, we need continuous bike lane segments,
especially near the freeway, which can intimidate would-be commuters.
3 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} The traffic light sensor for a left turn from Freeport Blvd onto 21st St responds to cars but not to bicycles. 1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} There's no reason we should be facilitating driving THROUGH the park. Land Park could be so nice! Instead its bisected by speeding cars.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} This intersection should be upgraded to detect cyclists as a major bike route servicing Light Rail, libraries, and schools.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Ueda Pkwy/Steelhead Creek needs access to
neighborhood streets on both sides of I-80. This will allow for safe bike route across freeway, from Gardenland to
shopping/jobs district (aka "the Pan")
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} West side of Freeport at 14th Ave lacks a crosswalk or a safe crossing of any kind. The "loop" forces pedestrians to cross two lanes of traffic TWICE with no obvious need for cars except for faster access for cut-thru traffic in LP
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Why are we not utilizing the bus lane. It's literally already built, the infrastructure is complete. Use it!!!!! 0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} We need a crosswalk over this freeway ramp to connect the new community with the rest of Natomas.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Walk/Bike bridge over canal to connect Jackrabbit Trail to shopping and housing.
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} The sidewalk at Oxford and Arden, towards Arden Del Paso intersection are incomplete. There isa mix of gravel, grass, and uneven asphalt.
1 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Snowy Egret Bike/Ped bridge over Hwy 5 to connect the eat and west sides of North Natomas
0 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} I think that the Golf Course Terrace Neighborhood is an under-served community. More specifically the intersection of 54th Ave and Hogan Drive needs to be prioritized as
extremely high. I see people regularly not only fail to stop but even fail to slow down at this intersection. This intersection is right next to a school and children are frequently in the area. If a round about were to be installed it would greatly improve the safety of the children in our community and it would impede people driving over 50 mph on Hogan Drive. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

PAGE 49 OF 56
TPP ID
See Appendix B for
location map
Improvement IDs, Names, Short
Descriptions
Observation Type Original comment and additional comments Up Votes

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} I regularly see people driving very fast on Hogan Drive and even failing to stop at the stop signs. If a roundabout were installed at 57th and Hogan Drive it would control and improve traffic control and flow. It would prevent people from driving through the intersection at a high rate of speed. I see people going through the intersection without stopping regularly. If a roundabout were to be installed it would have added benefit of improving pedestrian safety.
[no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} The Miester (now Shore Vista?) flyer over connecting the Northlake development to East Commerce. [no_TPP_ID] (blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This is a missing transportation
need
{Original} Better marked lanes and crossings for pedestrians and bicyclists over highway overpasses, Truxel Rd and Hwy 80 in particular. [no_TPP_ID]
(blank)

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Bicycle access on Marconi/Arcade Overpass 1

Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Improved lighting and ped/bike access to Marconi Station on Academy Way, basic services like drainage,
consideration as a collector route
{1} We need safe sidewalks here! The street is narrow and bi directional, this is one of our few parks in North Sac and there isn't even a sidewalk around it!
4 Comment not associated with a specific
planned project
This street is missing a project
previously approved by the City in a
planning process
{Original} Flyover connecting the Northlake community into North Natomas.
0 PAGE 50 OF 56
Appendix B. Initial Priorities Maps

PAGE 51 OF 56

PAGE 52 OF 56

PAGE 53 OF 56

PAGE 54 OF 56

PAGE 55 OF 56

PAGE 56 OF 56