APPENDIX B-51
South Segment – Sutterville S to Blair Avenue
(Proposed Concept 2)
• The consultant team presented the emerging design
to
the community which included:
New continuous sidewalks
New crosswalks with a traffic signal at Oregon
Dr. and Potrero Way
New separated bikeways
Enhanced transit facilities
Two travel lanes in each direction and maintained
turn lanes
• The community aff
irmed the emerging
opportunities and/or provided additional input on
the improvements.
EMERGING CONCEPTS
1 2
3 4
5 1
3 4 5
2 APPENDIX B-52
South Segment – Sutterville S to Blair
Avenue (Proposed Concept 2)
• Overall support for the separ ated bike lane
• Concerns about separated bike lanes near
dri
veways and curb cuts
• Desire for wide r sidewalks
• Increased safety at mai n intersections
• Separated bike lanes incent ivizes biking and
bike planning
• Desire for ra ising bike lanes near residential
• Overall support for a hyb rid of concepts 1
and 2
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
EMERGING CONCEPTS - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
APPENDIX B-53
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
EMERGING CONCEPTS - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
Additional Comments and Questions
• Do not use parking protected bike lanes in commercial areas where there are lots of dr
iveways as it confuses drivers and obstructs the line of sight. • Plan for speed reduction elements.
• Does code provide guidance on commercial property orientation? • Overall appreciation for engagement efforts.
APPENDIX B-54
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
NEXT STEPS
On-going Community Engagement (April to May)
• Community Survey – End ed on May 15 : freeportblvd.com Refine Preferred Design Concept (June/July 2022)
Community Engagement #3 – Preferred Concept – Aug/Sep 2022 APPENDIX B-55
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
MILESTONE #3:
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN
CONCEPTS AND
OPEN HOUSE
SUMMARY
APPENDIX B-56
INTRODUCTION
• Public Draft Design Concepts Workshop #3 occurred on October 26th, 2022, from 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm.
• The virtual workshop was held on Zoom a nd included an interactive discussion with MURAL.
• Over 24 people a ttended the meeting
• The video zoom recording o f the Public Draft Design Concepts Workshop #3 will be posted on the project website: www.freeportblvd.com
• The Community Open House occurred on Octob er 29, 2022, from 11:30 am to 1:30 pm • Over 28 people attended the Open House
APPENDIX B-57
OVERVIEW
• The purpose of Design Concepts Workshop #3 was to provide an overview of the publi
c draft design concepts and allow participants to weigh in on their preferred options.
• City Team included:
• Leslie Mancebo, Project Manager, City of Sacramento
• C
onsultant Team included:
• Mukul Malhotra, MI G
• Rishi Dhody, M IG
• Phoenix Alfaro, MIG
• Tracy McMillan, NN
• Isaac Gonzalez, DIYSL
• Jinky Dolar, OCA
• Dorcas Yee, OCA
• This document provides a summary of the
Pu
blic Draft Design Concepts Workshop #3.
APPENDIX B-58
MEETING AGENDA
• Welcome and Introductions
• Project Purpose, Goals and Process
• Community Vision and Goals
• Public Draft Design Framework Discussion
• Public Draft Design Concepts Discussion
• Next Steps
APPENDIX B-59
PROJECT AREA
The project area limits are from Sutterville Road to Blair Avenue
APPENDIX B-60
PROJECT GOALS
• Safety for all users.
• Mu
lti-modal Mobility for people who walk, bike, take transit and drive. • Community ide ntity.
• Meaningful and equi table community and stakeholder engagement. • Develop conceptual designs for short- and long-term improvements. • Coordinate and buil d upon previous and concurrent studies and initiatives.
APPENDIX B-61
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHODLER ENGAGEMENT
• Hollywood Park Neighborhood Association
• DaVinci School
• McClatchy High School
• Neighborhood Resident Listening Session
• Mangan Park Neighborhood Association
• Business Contacting
• Belle Cooledge L ibrary Pop Up Event
APPENDIX B-62
PROJECT PROCESS - COMMUNITY EVENTS AND MATERIALS
APPENDIX B-63
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
COMMUNITY VISION
The consultant team presented the Community Vision
and Public Draft Design Framework for the corridor
which was affirmed by the community.
BETTER
WALKING/
BIKING
CONNECTIONS
SAFETY
TRANSIT
EFFICIENCY
SHADE
&
COMFORT
NATURAL
ENVIRONMENT
NEIGHBOR-
HOOD
IDENTITY
MANAGED
TRAFFIC
FLOW
BUSINESS &
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
APPENDIX B-64
COMMUNITY VISION
The consultant team presented various improvement opportunities and the community affirmed the overall vision for the corridor.
Improve Transit Efficiency
Improve Safety Provide Safer Walking/Biking
Connections Improve Shade and Comfort
1 2 3 4
Celebrate Business &
Economic DevelopmentEnhance Natural Environment Celebrate Neighborhood Identity Reduce Traffic Congestion
5 6 7 8
APPENDIX B-65
COMMUNITY VISION
The community would like to see improvements to crosswalks and sidewalks to improve overall safety. Bicycle improvements are the top priorities for the community. The community would like continuous bicycle facilities.
76% 71% 64% 83% 65%
Street Trees and
Shade
Street and
Pedestrian Lighting
Wider Sidewalks Improved
Crosswalks
New Crosswalks
Sidewalk and Crosswalk Improvements
##% of people responded to the type of the improvement
67% 63%87% 86% 76%
Bike Improvements
Continuous Bike
Facilities
Improved Bike
Connections
Separated,
dedicated, bike
facilities
Buffered Bike
Facilities
New and Improved
Bike Parking
##% of people responded to the type of the improvement
APPENDIX B-66
36%77% 67% 67%
Transit Improvements
Driving Improvements
Synchronize Existing
Traffic Signals
Managed Traffic Speed
for Safety
Managed Traffic Flow
with Medians
Additional Traffic
Signals
85% 68% 46%
Improved Existing
Bus Stops
Bus Route Location
& Frequency
Additional Bus Stops
with Shelters
##% of people responded to the type of the improvement
##% of people responded to the type of the improvement
APPENDIX B-67
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN FRAMEWORK
• The consultant team presented the dra ft design framework which included:
• Improvements to Existing Signal
• New Planned Signal and Signal Improvements
• Proposed Signal with Crosswalks
• The community affirmed the proposed signals to improve overall connectivity and saf
ety.
APPENDIX B-68
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN FRAMEWORK – COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
The community affirmed the draft design framework and provided additional feedback:
• Desire for additional protected crosswalks at both Su tterville intersections to access the Landpark
• Add trees, medians and parking as safety measures to slow down traffic • Consolidate driveways to create continuous sidewalks
APPENDIX B-69
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN FRAMEWORK – COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
The community affirmed the draft design framework and provided additional feedback:
• Keep only one lane in each direction to give more space for pedestrians and bicyclist
s
• Add left turn signals to improve safety
• Get rid of parking to provide more space for protected bike lanes • Widen sidewalks and protected bike lanes
• Concerns about local businesses and a lack of parking • Support for improvements to transit facilities
• Consider a stop sign or traffic light near Garden Valley Elementary • Support for bike lane improvement to Fruitridge as it’s the most dangerous in
tersection in the corridor
• Add planters between parking
• Add protected right turn at Su tterville
• Add climate mitigation features
APPENDIX B-70
• The consultant team presented the publi c draft design concepts for the corridor. • The consultant team then opened the forum for the co mmunity discussion. • Participants were requested to share what they liked and disliked about each design. • The discussion focused on design concepts for the following segments:
• North Segment - From Sutterville N to Sutterville S
• South Segment - From Sutterville S to Blair Ave.
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPTS
APPENDIX B-71
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
NORTH SEGMENT –BETWEEN SUTTERVILLE - PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPT 1 3
4 5
2 North Segment - Sutterville N to Sutterville S
• The consultant team presented the design
con
cept to the community which included:
New continuous sidewalks
Improved crosswalks
New separated bikeways
Enhanced transit facilities
2 travel lanes in each direction
• The community aff
irmed the design concept
and provided additional input on the
improvements.
1 2
3 4
5 APPENDIX B-72
North Segment – From Sutterville N to Sutterville S
• Support for roundabouts to slow traffic and provide safety • Add feature to roundabout that represents Sac City College • Desire for ADA improvements and providing access for everyone • Reduce roundabout exit to one lane going NB
• Suggestion to better utilize the grass space in the roundabout Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
NORTH SEGMENT –BETWEEN SUTTERVILLE - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
APPENDIX B-73
North Segment – From Sutterville N to Sutterville S
• Desire for additional protected crosswalks at both Su tterville intersections to access the Landpark
• Add trees, medians, and parking as safety measures to slow down traffic • Support for improvements to transit facilities
• Add DG path along the sidewalk in the park area
• Widen sidewalks and protected bike lanes
• SB transit stop at roundabout makes crossing Freeport inconvenient, move to the othe
r side
• Improve left turn at 15th Ave., consider restricting left turns from 15th and 16th into Freeport
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
NORTH SEGMENT –BETWEEN SUTTERVILLE - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION APPENDIX B-74
South Segment –Sutterville S to Blair Avenue
(Proposed Concept 1: Separated Bikeway)
• The consultant team presented the draft design concept to the community which inclu
ded:
New continuous sidewalks
New crosswalks with a traffic signal at 4 locations
New separated bikeways
Enhanced transit facilities
2 travel lanes in each direction and maintained turn lanes • The community aff
irmed the draft design concept and provided additional input on the improvements.
SOUTH SEGMENT – CONCEPT 1 - PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN
1 2
3 4
5 1
3 4 5
2 APPENDIX B-75
South Segment – From Sutterville S to Blair
Avenue (Proposed Concept 1: Separated
Bikeway)
• Overall support for the sidewalk
impr
ovements and wider sidewalks
• Concerns about offering bike facilities in
ex
change for parking spaces for local
businesses
• Get rid of parking to provide more space for
prote
cted bike lanes
• Add trees, medians, and parking as safety
me
asures to slow down traffic
• Consolidate driveways to create continuous
side
walks
• Improve turn from Freeport north to Fruitridge
eas
t, very small turn lane with frequent conflicts
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
SOUTH SEGMENT - CONCEPT 1 - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
APPENDIX B-76
South Segment – From Sutterville S to Blair Avenue (Proposed Concept 1: Separated Bikeway)
• Concern about speeding at Hari an and Wentworth
• Long stretch without left turns, add U-turn s
• Make Raley’s parking entrance safer
• Adding a missing sidewalk adjacent to the airport is not necessary, the budget can go to othe
r improvements
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
SOUTH SEGMENT - CONCEPT 1 - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
APPENDIX B-77
South Segment – From Harian Way to Oregon Drive (Proposed Concept 2) SOUTH SEGMENT – CONCEPT 2 - PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN
• The consultant team presented the draft
de
sign concept to the community which included:
New continuous sidewalks
New crosswalks with a traffic signal at 4 locations
New buffered bikeways
Enhanced transit facilities
2 travel lanes in each direction and maintained turn lanes • The community aff
irmed the draft design concept and provided
additional input on the improvements.
1 3
4 5
2 1
2 3
4 5
APPENDIX B-78
South Segment – From Harian Way to
Oregon Drive (Proposed Concept 2)
• Concerns about dooring to bicyclists along
the
parking
• Concerns about local businesses and a lack
of park
ing
• Bike lanes should be next to the sidewalk
not park
ing in order to reduce bicyclist and
vehicle conflicts
• Reduce access to from parking to side
str
eets to improve safety at Harian and Irvin
• Support for crosswalk at Oregon
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
SOUTH SEGMENT - CONCEPT 2 - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
APPENDIX B-79
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
PUBLIC DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPTS - COMMUNITY DISCUSSION
Additional Comments and Questions
• Consider bulb- outs at Oregon and Irvin/Harian crossroads • What happens after the plan is finalized?
• Overall appreciation and support for engagement and design efforts
APPENDIX B-80
Longer Term Changes (South Bascom Urban Village Plan)
NEXT STEPS
• Refine Public Draft Design Concept (Nov/Dec 2022)
• Pu
blic Draft Plan – (D ec 2022 - Jan 2023)
I-1
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
APPENDIX C
SURVEY SUMMARIES
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
I-2
INTRODUCTION
• Language introduction both surveys
Clip shot of the online version of the survey
I-3
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
SURVEY #1
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
I-4
SURVEY #1: OVERVIEW
• Survey became available on Se ptember 24, 2021
and closed on November 22, 2021.
• It was available in English, Spanish, and Chinese.
• The online version of the survey was created using
Mapt
ionnaire, which is a map-based survey tool used
to facilitate simple and effective public participation.
Clip shot of the online version of the survey
I-5
SURVEY #1: OVERVIEW
Outreach photos where the survey was distributed
The online and paper versions of the survey were
distributed using the following methods:
• Shared on the project webpage
• Flyering and Business Cards
• P
op-Events
• D
oor-to-D oor Canvassing
• Community Walk Audits
• Community Workshop
I-6
SURVEY #1: OVERALL RESPONSE
• Over 376 respondents
o 374 online survey submissions
o 2 paper survey submissions
o 3 responses in Chinese
o Over 279 respondents completed the entire
sur
vey
• This analysis examines all the res ponses collected
and summarizes key findings to present a clear
vision on what the community wants to see for the
future of Freeport Boulevard.
Mapita Survey Hot-spot Analysis
I-7
SURVEY #1: OVERALL RESPONSE
About 276 people who responded to the survey live around Freeport Boulevard Fig. A: Where people live
I-8
SURVEY #1: WHERE PEOPLE WORK
Fig. B: Where people work
About 151 people who responded to the survey work around Freeport Boulevard I-9
SURVEY # 1: DEMOGRAPHICS
I-10
SURVEY #1: AGE
0% (0)
2% (5)
17% (47)
25% (71)
20% (59)
17% (50)
19% (56)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
The age of survey respondents ranged from 18 – 65+ years old. 35 – 44-year-olds made up most of respondents.
Fig. C: Age Chart
* Total number of respondents: 288
I-11
Female, 53% (148)Male, 40% (110)
Non-Binary, 1% (4)
Prefer Not to Say, 6% (17)
SURVEY #1: GENDER
Most survey respondents identified as female. Males make up the second largest group.
Fig. D: Gender of Survey Respondents
* Total number of respondents: 279
I-12
African
American/Black, 2%
(5)
Asian or Asian
American, 15% (39)
Caucasian/White,
61% (160)
Hispanic/Latino, 10%
(25)
Multi-Racial, 4% (10)
Native American, 2%
(5)
Prefer Not to
Answer, 8% (22)
I Would Prefer to
Self-Identify, 5% (13)
SURVEY #1: RACE/ETHNICITY
Caucasian/White makes up the largest racial/ethnic group of survey respondents.
Minorities and those who prefer not to answer or to self-identify, make up less than 50% of respondents.
Fig. E: Race/ethnicity of survey respondents
* Total number of respondents: 279
I-13
3% (9)
18% (47)
18% (48)
58% (152)
3% (7)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Less than 1 year
1-5 years
5-10 years
More than 10 years
Not applicable
SURVEY #1: HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED OR WORKED IN AND AROUND THE AREA? Fig. F: Age group of people who live and work around Freeport Boulevard A majority of survey respondents have lived or worked in and around the area for more than 10 years.
* Total number of respondents: 263
I-14
SURVEY #1: WHERE PEOPLE SHOP, PLAY, OR VISIT
About 1773 destinations were identified by the survey respondents.
Fig. G: Destinations identified by the survey respondents I-15
SURVEY #1: COMMUNITY VISION
I-16
SURVEY #1: VISION ELEMENTS
Improve Safety Provide Safer Walking/Biking Connections Improve Shade and Comfort
1 2
4 Improve Transit Efficiency
3 The vision elements shown
to the right were identified
through the common
themes found in responses
from the survey. This
included looking at the
overall responses for the
questions asked and the
open-ended comments
that were received.
I-17
SURVEY #1: VISION ELEMENTS
Enhance Natural Environment Celebrate Neighborhood Identity Reduce Traffic CongestionCelebrate Business & Economic Development 5 6
87 The vision elements shown
to the right were identified
through the common
themes found in responses
from the survey. This
included looking at the
overall responses for the
questions asked and the
open-ended comments
that were received.
I-18
83% (266)
74% (235)
50% (158)
75% (239)
66% (209)
47% (149)
54% (173)
42% (135)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Improve safety for people walking, biking, taking transit and driving.
Manage traffic speed to allow for more safe walking and biking connections to adjoining neighborhood, destinations, and trail connections.
Improve transit efficiency and convenience.
Improve the natural environment and overall shade and comfort for all users.
Enhance and incorporate the natural environment.
Improve neighborhood identity.
Strengthen business and economic development.
Reduce traffic congestion for better traffic flow.
SURVEY #1: COMMUNITY VISION
Over 80% of responses from people surveyed said they would like to improve safety for people walking, biking, taking transit and drive.
Fig. H: Community Vision
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 319
I-19
SURVEY #1: OTHER COMMUNITY VISION COMMENTS
“Create safe pedestrian
commute/walk
areas/routes that don’t
have car traffic.”
“Supporting existing small
businesses. Keeping the
multicultural nature of the
restaurants and businesses”
“Slowing
speeding traffic
would help us
all.
“Prioritize
neighborhood
access, from and
across both sides of
Freeport, by adding
back and enhancing
the ability for peds
and bikes to access
and cross Freeport.”
“ADA compliant
sidewalks. Safe
crossings across
Freeport Blvd.”
“Beautify the
corridor by burying
power lines, add
plants to medians
and sidewalk areas”
“Need wide
sidewalks and
interesting shops or
landmarks near the
sidewalk”
“Better lighting
through the
corridor for all who
use it”
“Continue the
green bike lanes.”
“Install crosswalks
with a light so
families can’t walk
to school safely.”
“Preserve the area's
mid-century identity
- architecture and
neon signage”
I-20
SURVEY #1: MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY
IMPROVEMENTS
I-21
SURVEY #1: MODE SHIFT ANALYSIS
29% (106) 25% (91)
6%(23)
92%(335)
2% (7)
51% (185) 59% (215)
18% (66)
62% (223)
2% (7)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
Walk Bike Ride the bus Drive Other
How would you like to travel?
How do you usually travel?
A mode shift analysis was performed using responses from the survey to compare current and preferred modes of travel along Freeport Boulevard. Overall, there was a desire to decrease the amount of driving and increase the use of other modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and riding the bus. Respondents who chose “Other” listed light rail, streetcar, and scooters as ways they currently or want to travel along Freeport Boulevard.
Fig. I: How respondents currently travel along Freeport Boulevard and how they would like to travel * Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 365 (Usually Travel) and 362 (Want to Travel) I-22
SURVEY #1: MODE SHIFT ANALYSIS –WALKING
29% (106)
51% (185)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Want to Walk
Currently Walk
Currently 29% of people walk on the corridor, but there is a desire to increase the amount of people walking to 51%.
Fig. J: Mode Shift Analysis - Walking
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 365 (Usually Travel) and 362 (Want to Travel) I-23
SURVEY #1: MODE SHIFT ANALYSIS - BIKING
25% (91)
59% (215)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Currently 25% of people bike on the corridor, but there is a desire to increase the amount of people biking to 59%.
Fig. K: Mode Shift Analysis - Biking
Want to Bike
Currently Bike
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 365 (Usually Travel) and 362 (Want to Travel) I-24
SURVEY #1: MODE SHIFT ANALYSIS – RIDING THE BUS
6% (23)
18% (66)
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20%
Currently 6% of people ride the bus, but there is a desire to increase the amount of people taking transit to 18%.
Fig. L: Mode Shift Analysis - Transit
Want to Ride the Bus
Currently Ride the Bus
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 365 (Usually Travel) and 362 (Want to Travel) I-25
SURVEY #1: MODE SHIFT ANALYSIS - DRIVING
92% (335)
62% (223)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Currently 92% of people drive on the corridor, but there is a desire to decrease the amount of people driving to 62%.
Fig. M: Mode Shift Analysis - Driving
Want to Drive
Currently Drive
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 365 (Usually Travel) and 362 (Want to Travel) I-26
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
SURVEY #1: EMERGING
OPPORTUNITIES
I-27
SURVEY #1: WALK AND ROLL IMPROVEMENTS
Street Trees and Shade
76% (235)
Wider Sidewalks
Street and Pedestrian Lighting
64% (198)71% (218)
About 76% of responses from people surveyed said they would like to see more street trees and shade. 71% people also desire for street and pedestrian lighting.
Fig. N: Community Identified Sidewalk Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 309
I-28
SURVEY #1: WALK AND ROLL IMPROVEMENTS
Location Specific Improvements
• From 38th to Oregon
• From Oregon to Argail Way
• F
rom Sutterville to 13th
As y
ou walk along Freeport Boulevard, are there other issues or challenges that you experience that you would like to improve?
• Add continuous sidewalks at all crossings.
• All along freeport there are various signs poles that extend into the sidewalks and are too narr
ow for wheelchairs to go through.
• At Fruitridge the right turn lane design for vehicles is dangerous for people walking and bi
king. Slow turning vehicles by proving 90 degree turns, not broad free-flow-like turns.
• People drive WAY too fast. It's not safe to be on foot, especially with kids. • Poor landscaping in some areas and streets need to upgrade raised dividers between dif
ferent sides of traffic.
• Some areas do not have real sidewalks - the y are part of horrible parking lots. • Would like to see more crosswalks with flashing lights or stop signs similar to those on Su
tterville and Freeport by City College.
I-29
SURVEY #1: CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS
Fig. O: Community Identified Crosswalk Improvements
Improve Existing Crosswalks New opportunities to cross the street 83% (256) 65% (200)
Survey results showed that more responses supported improved existing crosswalks (83%) than adding new and more opportunities to cross the street (65%). * Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 309
I-30
SURVEY #1: WALK AND ROLL IMPROVEMENTS – CROSSWALKS
Priority Crosswalk Improvements
Existing or New Proposed Intersections:
• Both Sutterville Intersections
• Meer Way Intersection
• Stacia Way Intersection
• Irvin Way Intersection
• Fruitridge Intersection
• Claudia Intersection
• 35th Intersection
• Blair Intersection
• 16th Intersection
• 23rd Intersection
• Virginia Way Intersection
• Oregon Intersection
Fig. O: Community Identified Crosswalk Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 309
• 38th Ave Intersection
• Kitchner
• McAllister
I-31
Improved Bike Connections
86% (231)
SURVEY #1: BIKE IMPROVEMENTS
Continuous Bike Facilities New and Improved Bike Parking 67% (180)87% (233)
Connectivity was a common theme found in all responses from the survey. 87% of responses supported continuous bike facilities to planned destinations.
Fig. P: Community Identified Bike Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 268
I-32
Separated, dedicated, bike facilities
SURVEY #1: BIKE IMPROVEMENTS
When it comes to a preferred bike facility, 76% of responses supported separated, dedicated, bike facilities.
76% (183)
Fig. P: Community Identified Bike Improvements
Buffered bike facilities
63% (150)
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 240
I-33
SURVEY #1: BIKE IMPROVEMENTS – PREFERRED FACILITY
Location Specific Improvements
• From Blair to Fruitridge
• From Fruitridge to Sutterville
When b
iking along Freeport Boulevard, are there other issues or challenges that you experience that you would like to improve?
• A safe route for bikes to McClatchy high school. Students go on the wrong side of the str
eet in the mornings because there isn’t a good place to cross Freeport- it’s dangerous.
• Using Freeport to get to downtown by bike would be ideal but we would need the ci
ty to commit to cleaning the streets from debris and ideally protected bike lanes both vertically and horizontally.
• Better separation from traffic, better paint indication on the asphalt, I would also like to s
ee improved signage and connection to the Sacramento River bike trail. • Freeport is scary to bike on. We use the sidewalk, but it’s pretty narrow! • Vehicles drive too fast and don't look out for bikes. There are too many driveways and othe
r dangerous crossings for Freeport to be bike friendly right now.
I-34
SURVEY #1: TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS
Improved Existing Bus Stops Bus Route Location & Frequency Additional Bus Stops with Shelters 85% (194) 68% (154) 46% (105)
According to survey, there is a desire to use more transit if it was more convenient and efficient. 85% of responses supported improving existing bus stops.
Fig. Q: Community Identified Transit Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 228
I-35
SURVEY #1: TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS
Location Specific Improvements
• In front of Raley’s
• Around the 35th Intersection
• Around the Potrero Intersection
• Around the Fruitridge Intersection
• Between 23rd and Meer Way
• Between both Sutterville Intersections
As
you move through the corridor using transit, are there other issues or challenges that you experience with transit that you would like to improve? • Add back stops on the 11 for kids coming from California Middle School towards Fr
eeport and Kitchner. To avoid having to cross the intersections at Sutterville and freeport.
• An unhoused person was using the bench for the bus stop in front of Airway Market so
the bench was removed.
• Automated times and information for riders at stations. • Stops need to be closer to intersections.
I-36
SURVEY #1: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS
Synchronize Existing Traffic Signals Managed Traffic Speed for Safety Manage Traffic Flow with Medians 77% (222) 67% (192) 67% (192)
More than 90% of people currently drive along the corridor. There is support from 77% of responses for synchronizing existing signals.
Fig. R: Community Identified Intersection Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 288
I-37
SURVEY #1: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS
Additional Traffic Signals
36% (104)
There is also support for adding new signalized intersections (36%).
Fig. R: Community Identified Intersection Improvements
* Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 288
I-38
SURVEY #1: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS
Location Specific Improvements
• Both Sutterville Intersections
• Wentworth/Stacia Way Intersection
• Potrero/Virginia Way Intersection
• Harian/Irvin Way Intersection
• Or
egon Intersection
As
you drive along Freeport Boulevard, are there other issues or challenges that you experience while driving that you would like to improve? • The signals need to move traffic more efficiently during commute hours. When Delta Sh
ores is fully populated, the traffic will be a nightmare. Sync the lights to keep cars moving North/South.
• The portion of Freeport in front of the new Raleys has a much different feel than the rest of Freeport. Although it looks aesthetically nice, traffic by the driveway to the shopping center gets congested and it’s hard to distinguish where the driveway is located since there are no obvious visual cues (e.g no signage) indicating the entrance. • Speeds needs to be reduced, curb cuts on Frutridge ne ed to be removed. Due to
induced demand "Improving traffic flow" will only make the corridor more dangerous for everyone not in a car.
• Fruitridge Intersection
• 35th Intersection
• Blair Intersection
I-39
SURVEY #1: DRIVING IMPROVEMENTS
• The visibility of pedestrians and cyclists to drivers - re ally tough to see. Also, because Freeport Boulevard. is at an angle and how the neighborhood streets are developed, pedestrians spend LOTS of time in the street... meaning a feeling of unease in crossing. Also, creating a slower speed for drivers entering neighborhoods *from* Freeport Boulevard. It's too easy for a car to maintain the 40MPH speed limit well into the neighborhood.
• The southern portion of this street looks blighted and uninviting. When people want to
shop their money will flow to fund the improvements. However, the visitors must come first.
• Freeport would be a way better street if you made the speed limit (and all the traffic flow
stuff) for ~20 mph.
• Remove car lanes and curb cuts. Add traffic calming devices. Enforce speed laws and ta
ke away drivers licenses from people who speed.
• More lighting outside of the businesses for people to see. • When lights are closer together such as near Sac City it would be helpful if they were sy
nchronized. I don’t always feel safe as a driver on Freeport either. The roads are narrow at the intersection of Fruitridge and Freeport going towards downtown. Also, bike infrastructure REALLY needs to be built on Blair Ave in order to connect to Freeport.
I-40
SURVEY #1: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Wayfinding and Signage Outdoor Retail and Commerce On-street parking 52% (121) 85% (200) 42% (99)
There is a strong interest in supporting economic development and local businesses. About 85% of respondents supported wider sidewalks for outdoor retail and commerce.
Fig. S: Community Identified Economic Development Improvements * Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Total number of respondents: 234
I-41
SURVEY #1: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Location Specific Improvements
• Both Sutterville Intersections
• In front of Riley’s
• Oregon Intersection
• Fruitridge Intersection
• North of the Blair Intersection
• North of the 23rd Intersection
Are there other improvements or opportunities to support local businesses, destinations, and guide economic development that you think are important? • Buffer parking lots from the street with landscaping. • Businesses should add bike racks and place them in places that actually feel safe. • Consider dining parklets for existing restaurants; work with strip mall owners to addre
ss entry/exit points to make safer.
• Get rid of the huge, ugly and dangerous parking lots and street parking that face the str
eet. Parking should be in the rear of buildings or used as a bike lane buffer. The street side of buildings should be for walking, sitting, eating, and enjoying the outdoors. It shouldn't be an asphalt wasteland like it unfortunately is now. •
Create a slower pace of traffic and incentive to stop.
I-42
SURVEY #1: ADDITIONAL IDEAS OR COMMENTS
Additional Comments
• Active transportation is more crucial than ever. We need to drastically improve the safe
ty and accessibility of walking, cycling, and transit options. Cycling in particular has the potential to change long stretches of urban streets like Freeport if it is given proper safety measures and connection to a continuous, widespread network of routes connecting neighborhoods.
• Trees, shrubs and flower beds, please!
• This corridor is nominated as a Green Zone to encourage infill development. Reducing the
automobile orientation of this corridor will support Green Zone goals. More info on Green Zones is available at https://www.sacog.org/greenmeansgo. • My kids walk across freeport everyday on their way to school. I'd like them to be able to bik
e, but the road is too dangerous.
I-43
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
SURVEY #2
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS
I-44
SURVEY #2: OVERVIEW
• Survey became av ailable on April 11, 2022 and
closed on May 15, 2022.
• It was av ailable in English, Spanish, and Chinese.
• The online ve rsion of the survey was created using
Maptionnaire, which is a map-based survey tool used
to facilitatesimple and effectivepublic participation.
Clip shot of the online version of the survey
I-45
SURVEY #2: OVERVIEW
The online and paper versions of the survey were
distributed using the following methods:
• Shared on the projectwebpage
• Flyering and Business Cards
• Pop-up Events
• Door-to-Door Business Owner Canvassing
• Community Workshop #2 – Design Concepts
Outreach photos where the survey was distributed
I-46
SURVEY #2: OVERALL RESPONSE
• Over 416 resp ondents
o 416 online survey su bmissions
o All responses a re in English
o Over 151 respondents com pleted the entire
survey
• This analysis exa mines all the responses collected and summarizes key findings to present a clear vision on
what the community wants to see for the futureof
Freeport Boulevard.
I-47
SURVEY # 2: DEMOGRAPHICS
I-48
SURVEY #2: AGE
The age of survey respondents ranged from under 18-65+ years old. 35-44-year-olds made up most of respondents.
Total number of respondents: 152
21% (32)
16% (25)
18% (28)
32% (48)
10% (15)
3% (4)
0% (0)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
65+
55-64
45-54
35-44
25-34
18-24
Under 18
I-49
SURVEY #2: GENDER
Female, 47% (70)
Male, 45% (67)
Non-Binary, 1% (2)
Prefer Not to Say, 7% (11) Prefer to Self-Identify, 0% (0) Most survey respondents identified as female.Males make up the second largest group.
Total number of respondents: 150
I-50
SURVEY #2: RACE/ETHNICITY
African American/Black, 3% (4)
Asian or Asian American, 19% (27)
Caucasian/White, 60% (84)
Hispanic/Latino, 6% (9)
Multi-Racial, 9% (12)
Native American, 0% (0)
Prefer Not to Answer, 6% (9)
Would Prefer to Self-Identify, 4% (6)
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice *Total number of respondents: 139
Total number of responses: 151
Caucasian/White makes up the largest racial/ethnic group of survey responses. Minorities and those who prefer not to answer or to self-identify,make up less than 50% of responses.
I-51
Less than 1 Year, 2%(3)
1-5 Years, 28% (38)
5-10 Years, 15% (20)
More than 10 Years, 50%
(67)
Not Applicable, 5% (7)
Most survey respondents have lived or worked in and around the area for more than 10 years.
Total number of respondents: 135
SURVEY #2: LIVED OR WORKED IN AND AROUND THE AREA
I-52
Live, 67% (90)
Work, 31% (42)
Play, 69% (93)
Not Applicable, 5% (7)
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice * Total number of respondents: 134
Total number of responses: 232
Most survey respondents live, work, or play in the area.
SURVEY #2: LIVE, WORK, OR PLAY
I-53
SURVEY # 2: EMERGING DESIGN
FRAMEWORK
I-54
SURVEY #2: EMERGING DESIGN FRAMEWORK
The consultant shared the Emerging Design Framework map which illustrates the locations of:
• Improved ex isting signals and crosswalks
• Newly proposed c rosswalks with signal control
I-55
SURVEY #2: EMERGING DESIGN FRAMEWORK
80% (152)
42% (79)
76% (144)
23% (43)
12% (23)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Improved Safety
Additional Connections to Destinations
Increased Opportunities to Cross the Street
Improved Access to Bus Stops
Other (Please Specify Below)
Over 80% of responses from people surveyed feel like the proposed crosswalk and signals will improve safety. 76% of survey responses also indicated that the proposed improvements wouldincreaseopportunities to cross the street. *Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice *Total number of respondents: 190
Total number of responses: 441
I-56
SURVEY #2: EMERGING DESIGN FRAMEWORK COMMUNITY FEEDBACK The community affirmed the Emerging Design Framework and provided additional feedback.
Redesign the curb to
change vehicle turning
radius. Similar to the curb
at C St and Elvas Ave.
Add a
crosswalk
Either a traffic signal or
roundabout here. The
existing signal is hard to
see and way too easy for
anyone unfamiliar with
Freeport to miss.
I highly recommend a
roundabout at this
intersection.
A whole intersection redesign
to incorporate all mode of
transportation. Maybe a "Bike
Scramble" design implemented
in San Jose
People are literally
killed crossing the
street here please add
this crosswalk & signal.
Cars coming from Ottos, turning right onto
Freeport are looking north for break in
traffic, and turn into the crosswalk without
looking for pedestrians. Better signage is
needed to warn of pedestrians when
turning right on red. This is also true at
other intersections too.
I'm glad to see a
proposed crossing at
Virginia Way, this is
much needed.
Add Crosswalk East to
west giving access
directly to William
Land Park from the
Hollywood Park
neighborhood.
it is hard to get over
here on your bike to
turn left from freeport
onto Sutterville
I-57
• Overall support of crosswalk with signal control and bikeways. • Ensure improved and new crosswalk signals are clearly visible and defined. • Support for reducing vehicle speeds by incorporating traffic calming measures. • Support for intersection improvements that consider all modes of transportation. • Explore options such as roundabouts as traffic calming measures. • Suggestions to redesign turning lanes (similar to the curb at C and Elvas Ave). • Support for pedestrian safety and better signage in turning lanes. • Support for proposed/improved crosswalks with signal control at:
o Portero Way
o Blair Ave
o Sutterville Rd (ensure access directly to William Land Park from Hollywood Park ne
ighborhood)
• Improve bicycle route from Freeport onto Sutterville. • Suggestion to add a roundabout near Fruitridge Road.
SUR
VEY #2: EMERGING DESIGN FRAMEWORK COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
I-58
SURVEY # 2: EMERGING DESIGN
CONCEPTS
I-59
SURVEY #2: CORRIDOR SEGMENTS
The consultant shared the Emerging Design Concepts for the differentsegments of the corridor shown below:
• North Segment - F rom SuttervilleEast to SuttervilleWest • South Segment - F rom SuttervilleWest to Blair Ave.
I-60
SURVEY #2: NORTH SEGMENT
The consultant team presented the proposed
improvements which included:
• Sidewalk and sidewalk ramp improvements
• Trees to provide shade where the sidewalk is wide
enou
gh
• Separated bikeways all along the segment by
re
moving parking on the east side of the street
• Enhanced transit facilities at the bus stop with
sh
elter and amenities
• Reduced travel lane widths to encourage traffic
calmin
g, and synchronized traffic signals to improve
traffic flow
• Replaced parking for the separated bikeways
Existing View
Proposed View
I-61
SURVEY #2: NORTH SEGMENT
90% (131)
85% (124)
68% (99)
45% (65)
72% (105)
9% (13)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
People Walking People Biking People Taking Transit People Driving Calming Traffic Other (Please Specify Below) Over 85% of responses from people surveyed said they support the proposed improvements for people walking and people biking. 72% of people surveyed also said they support the proposed improvements for calming traffic. *Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice *Total number of respondents: 146
Total number of responses: 537
I-62
SURVEY #2: NORTH SEGMENT – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
The community affirmed the emerging design concepts
and provided additional feedback.
Pedestrian Improvements
• Support for improved side walks and pedestrian friendly intersections.
• Support for trees for shade.
• Suggestion for rais ed crosswalks at heavily used
pedestrian crosswalks.
Bicycle Improvements
• Overall support of prote cted bicycle lanes to ensure safety.
• Ensure the bicycle lanes are clearly visible to vehicles to im
prove safety.
Existing View
Proposed View
I-63
SURVEY #2: NORTH SEGMENT – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
Transit Improvements
• Concerns about bus and bike conflicts.
Drivin
g Improvements
• Ensure driveways an d access points do not cause
significant points of conflict that increase traffic
congestion, increase crashes with cyclists,pedestrians, and other vehicles.
• Overall support for safer intersections with traffic
calmin
g measures.
• Consider adding brick pavers for traffic calming and
visibilit
y.
• Ensure curb height to avoid vehicles parking in
bi
cycle lane.
Existing View
Proposed View
I-64
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 1
The consultant team presented the proposed
improvements which included:
• Trees to provide shade where the sidewalk is wide
enou
gh
• Separated bikeways all along the segment by
re
moving parking on the east side of the street
• Enhanced transit facilities at the bus stop with
sh
elter and amenities
• Reduced travel lane widths to encourage traffic
calmin
g, and synchronized traffic signals to improve
traffic flow
• Replaced parking for the separated bikeways
Existing View
Proposed View
I-65
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 1
86% (108)
77% (97)
65% (82)
44% (56)
65% (82)
9% (11)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
People Walking People Biking People Taking Transit People Driving Calming Traffic Other (Please Specify Below) 86% of responses from people surveyed said they support the proposed improvements for people walking. Over 77 % of people surveyed said they support the proposed improvements for people biking.
*Total number of respondents: 126
Total number of responses: 436
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice I-66
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 1 – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK The community affirmed the emerging design concepts
and provided additional feedback:
Pedestrian Improvements
• Support for wider sidewalks.
Bi
cycle Improvements
• Suggestion to relocate proposed bikeway to the
righ
t side of the right turn lane to ensure user
visibility and safety.
• Overall support for separated bikeways to ensure
safe
ty and visibility.
Transit Improvements
• Support for better transit facilities, including
dedi
cated bus lanes.
Existing View
Proposed View
I-67
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 1 – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Driving Improvements
• Concerns about needing on street parking when
parki
ng lots are usually empty.
• Support for fewer and narrow lanes.
• Concerns around the "door zone" of parked cars
when
it comes to bicyclist safety.
• Support for added traffic calming measures, such as
bul
b-outs on every other crosswalk.
• Suggestion to remove driveway access to Freeport
and r
oute parking lot access to side streets.
• Overall support for medians, added bulb outs and
si
gnal control.
Existing View
Proposed View
I-68
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 2
The consultant team presented the proposed
improvements which included:
• Sidewalk and sidewalk ramp improvements
• Trees to provide shade where the sidewalk is wide
enou
gh
• Separated bikeways along the street by removing
parki
ng spaces
• Enhanced transit facilities at the bus stop with
sh
elter and amenities
• Reduced travel lane widths and wider medians to
en
courage traffic calming, and synchronized traffic
signals to improve traffic flow
• Removed parking for the separated bikeways
Existing View
Proposed View
I-69
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 2
91% (107) 91% (107)
69% (81)
50% (58)
74% (87)
9% (10)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
People Walking People Biking People Taking Transit People Driving Calming Traffic Other (Please Specify Below) 91% of responses from people surveyed said they support the proposed improvements for people walking and people biking. Over 74% of people surveyed said they support the proposed improvements for calming traffic.
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice *Total number of respondents: 117
Total number of responses: 450
I-70
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 2 – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK The community affirmed the emerging design concepts
and provided additional feedback:
Pedestrian Improvements
• Ensure pedestrian and cyclist visibility at
int
ersections.
• Support for tree shade and landscaping adjacent to
trans
it shelters.
Bicycle Improvements
• Overall support of separated bikeway to ensure
saf
ety in the corridor.
• Support for a clear separation between sidewalk
an
d bicycle lanes to ensure safety.
Existing View
Proposed View
I-71
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT CONCEPT 2 – COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Transit Improvements
• Suggestion to add a dedicated bus lane.
• Support for new bus stop locations.
Drivin
g Improvements
• Ensure a protected intersection with traffic calming
med
ians.
• Overall support for a hybrid of concepts 1 and 2
Existing View
Proposed View
I-72
SURVEY #2: SOUTH SEGMENT – CONCEPT COMPARISON
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice Overall, responses from people surveyed preferred the proposed improvements for Concept 2. 91% of people surveyed support the proposed improvements for people biking and people walking in Concept 2.
*Respondents were able to choose more than 1 answer choice 86% (108)
77% (97)
65% (82)
44% (56)
65% (82)
9% (11)
91% (107)
91% (107)
69% (81)
50% (58)
74% (87)
9% (10)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
People Walking
People Biking
People Taking Transit
People Driving
Calming Traffic
Other (Please Specify Below)
Concept 2 Concept 1
APPENDIX D-1
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
APPENDIX D
WALKING WORKSHOP
SUMMARY
NOV 6, 2021
APPENDIX D-2
OVERVIEW
• A walking workshop was held on November 6th, 2021.
• Approximately 15 people attended this in-person event. • This tour of Freeport Boulevard was developed as one of the many ways to gather community input.
• A walking tour guidebook w as prepared that included the walking route and questionnaires to record observations made by the community.
APPENDIX D-3
WALKING WORKSHOP – LOCATIONS
• Six observation stops were included in the workshop:
A. H
arian Way
B. Or
egon Drive
C. Stacia Way
D. Meer Way
E. Sutterville Road
F. New Railey’s
APPENDIX D-4
LOCATION A – HARIAN WAY
• Sidewalks have many obstructions such as utility boxes and poles. • This stretch of Freeport is noisy due to car traffic. • On-street parking near driveways block sight lines for pedestrians to be seen. • W
ider and separated sidewalk with shade trees would be a major improvement here.
APPENDIX D-5
LOCATION B – OREGON DRIVE
• Restore the crosswalk that existed with so me kind of pedestrian-activated signal. • Everything looks and feels run down.
• Underground the utilities.
• Concrete sidewalks should replace the asphalt sidewalks. • Reduce travel lane widths to under 11-fe et as a pilot to see how it reduces travel speed.
• Bulbouts at corners to slow down cars and pedestrian refuge islands. • Bus stop needs a shelter.
APPENDIX D-6
LOCATION C – STACIA WAY
• Sidewalks feel narrow and should be widened.
• Vehicle traffic is too fast in this area because the roadway is so wide. • The parking from Red Hawk Casino shuttles should be moved off of str eet. • Should prohibit left turns at Virginia Way.
• Bulbouts and pedestrian refuge islands would help facilitate crossing the street.
APPENDIX D-7
LOCATION D – MEER WAY
• Intersection at Meer is good for pe destrians, but doesn’t serve bicyclists well. • Not as noisy or dangerous-feel ing as further south by Oregon Drive • Bulbouts are needed in this stretch
• Cars exiting parking lots hang over sidewalk
APPENDIX D-8
LOCATION E – SUTTERVILLE ROARD (WEST)
• Bulbouts are needed in this area.
• A physical barrier for northbound bike lane is needed between the two Sutterville.
Ro
ads as right-turning cars drive in bike lane.
• Sidewalks need widening.
• Pedestrian button on east side is hidden and needs to be moved.
APPENDIX D-9
LOCATION F – NEW RAILEY’S
• Bus stop needs a walkway connection to sidewalk. Bus riders now have to wa lk through landscaping.
• Landscaping between sidewalk and street makes it very inviting and should be used on wh
ole corridor.
• Street lights ar e nice.
• Buffered bike lane is an improvement, but most would still ride on sidewalks because of sp
eed of adjacent traffic.
• Buried utilities makes such a huge difference.
APPENDIX D-10
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS
• Street trees needed for shade.
• The group talked often about bu lbouts to shorten
crossing distance, slow traffic, and slow turning
vehicles.
• The group mentioned green paint in bike lanes to
imp
rove awareness.
• The sidewalks felt too narrow at almost the entire
str
etch with many obstructions like utility poles and
boxes.
• Many in the group commented on concrete sidewalks
needi
ng to replace the asphalt or broken sidewalks.
APPENDIX D-11
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
APPENDIX D
WALKING WORKSHOP
SUMMARY
NOV 6, 2021
APPENDIX D-1
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
APPENDIX E
TRAFFIC COUNTS
Appendix: 2021 Traffic Counts
The following pages contains data collected Fall 2021
Speed and Average Daily Traffic data were recorded at key intersections along Northgate Boulevard. Hourly counts were collected North of (N/O) and South of (S/O) to estimate average speed and volume at the following intersections:
- Rosin (N/O and S/O)
- Haggin (N/O and S/O)
- Jefferson (N/O and S/O)
Turn Movement Counts (TMC) record vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle moving North, South, East, and West at key
intersections on Northgate and Freeport Boulevard. TMC were used as a means of estimating ADT at the following
intersections
:
- Northgate and San Juan
- Northgate and Haggin
- Northgate and El Camino
- Northgate and Arden Garden Connector
- Freeport and Oregon
Parking Occupancy data was collected at Freeport Boulevard for all 34 blockfaces that allow parking. Counts were
conducted from 7:00 - 8:30 AM and 4:00 - 5:30 PM.
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID: 21-070163-005 Day:
City: Sacramento Date:
AM 30 584 20 2 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 25 1028 40 5 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 2 1 0 0 23 0 12
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 19 0 6
12 0 9 0 TEV 1581 0 1874 0 0 0 0
2 0 2 1 PHF 0.85 0.93
12 0 12 0 0 1 2 0
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 11 9 676 15 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 7 15 864 15 AM
0 NONE
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM 713
Freeport Blvd & Oregon Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Freeport Blvd Thursday
SOUTHBOUND 9/23/2021
2:45 PM - 07:15 PM
PEAK HOURS
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM 890 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM
COUNT PERIODS
NONE
57 0 37
Totals (AM) 1070 Total Bikes (AM)
Oregon Dr
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
Oregon Dr
45 0 34
CONTROL
2-Way Stop(EB/WB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM) Total Bikes (PM)
0 609
NORTHBOUND
Freeport Blvd
Totals (NOON) Total Bikes (NOON)
NOONAM PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
NOON
PM
AM
NOON
AM
PM
NOON
AM
PM
NOON
PM
AM
0 0
1 0
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 1 1
0 1
2 0
1 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
1 3
1 0
3 0
0 0
00 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 2
0 0
4 0
23 0
1912
2 9
25 1028
40 15
676
9 0
0 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12 0
612
2 12
30 584
20 15
864
15 National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Freeport Blvd & Oregon Dr
City: Sacramento Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 1 125 0 0 1 53 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 188
7:15 AM 1 124 0 0 1 74 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 208
7:30 AM 1 241 1 2 1 112 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 368
7:45 AM 0 258 1 4 4 178 6 0 3 1 5 0 1 0 3 0 464
8:00 AM 2 204 6 0 6 157 6 0 6 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 392
8:15 AM 4 181 3 1 3 141 5 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 5 0 349
8:30 AM 9 221 5 2 7 108 13 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 376
8:45 AM 8 196 3 1 8 174 12 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 411
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 26 1550 19 10 31 997 51 3 22 2 20 0 7 1 17 0 2756 APPROACH %'s : 1.62% 96.57% 1.18% 0.62% 2.87% 92.14% 4.71% 0.28% 50.00% 4.55% 45.45% 0.00% 28.00% 4.00% 68.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 15 864 15 7 20 584 30 2 12 2 12 0 6 0 12 0 1581 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.417 0.837 0.625 0.438 0.714 0.820 0.577 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.600 0.000 0.750 0.000 0.600 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:45 PM 4 155 6 5 13 277 6 2 1 0 3 0 3 0 9 0 484
3:00 PM 3 173 5 1 8 219 9 3 1 0 4 0 4 0 7 0 437
3:15 PM 2 144 3 1 4 212 6 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 381
3:30 PM 3 163 2 3 8 194 8 0 2 1 2 0 4 1 5 0 396
3:45 PM 2 135 5 3 5 218 4 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 4 0 381
4:00 PM 1 135 9 3 7 233 6 1 2 0 3 0 1 0 6 0 407
4:15 PM 1 129 6 2 12 233 6 0 2 0 4 0 5 0 3 0 403
4:30 PM 1 160 4 2 10 227 3 1 2 0 4 0 6 0 5 0 425
4:45 PM 2 156 0 4 9 246 6 1 1 0 4 0 3 0 9 0 441
5:00 PM 3 170 5 1 13 259 6 2 3 0 3 0 7 0 3 0 475
5:15 PM 2 163 4 5 9 251 6 1 3 0 1 0 2 0 9 0 456
5:30 PM 2 187 6 1 9 272 7 1 2 2 4 0 7 0 2 0 502
5:45 PM 1 153 5 1 11 206 7 1 1 2 0 0 5 1 6 0 400
6:00 PM 1 133 0 1 6 204 4 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 4 0 362
6:15 PM 4 147 6 3 5 173 3 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 4 0 353
6:30 PM 2 141 4 3 5 151 4 1 3 0 3 0 4 1 7 0 329
6:45 PM 3 116 5 3 6 158 8 0 0 1 4 0 3 0 1 0 308
7:00 PM 3 148 1 1 7 174 3 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 343
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 40 2708 76 43 147 3907 102 18 25 11 45 0 70 4 87 0 7283 APPROACH %'s : 1.40% 94.45% 2.65% 1.50% 3.52% 93.60% 2.44% 0.43% 30.86% 13.58% 55.56% 0.00% 43.48% 2.48% 54.04% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 9 676 15 11 40 1028 25 5 9 2 12 0 19 0 23 0 1874 PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.750 0.904 0.625 0.550 0.769 0.945 0.893 0.625 0.750 0.250 0.750 0.000 0.679 0.000 0.639 0.000 21-070163-005
9/23/2021
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.9330.907 0.950 0.719 0.875
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
0.852
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.856 0.846 0.722 0.643
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Freeport Blvd Freeport Blvd Oregon Dr Oregon Dr
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count Location: Freeport Blvd & Oregon Dr
City: Sacramento Project ID:
Control: 2-Way Stop(EB/WB) Date:
NS/EW Streets:
1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 40 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
2:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3:30 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
3:45 PM 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6:00 PM 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
6:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 0 12 2 0 2 9 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 30
APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0.00% 15.38% 69.23% 15.38% 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 292 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 3 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.000 0.375 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.375 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 21-070163-005
9/23/2021
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.6670.375 0.417
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
0.375
PM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.333 0.500
AM
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Freeport Blvd Freeport Blvd Oregon Dr Oregon Dr
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement CountLocation: Freeport Blvd & Oregon Dr Project ID:
City: Sacramento Date:
NS/EW Streets:
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
7:15 AM 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 14
APPROACH %'s : 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 66.67% 33.33% 57.14% 42.86% PEAK HR : 07:45 AM 39 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 7
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
2:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
3:45 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
5:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2
6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES : 1 0 1 1 6 5 4 3 21
APPROACH %'s : 100.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 54.55% 45.45% 57.14% 42.86% PEAK HR : 04:45 PM 289 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL : 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 4
PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.250 0.250 0.250
21-070163-005
9/23/2021
0.3330.250 0.375
04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
0.875
PM
NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
0.500 0.500 0.375
07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
AM
NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Freeport Blvd Freeport Blvd Oregon Dr Oregon Dr
Location: Freeport Blvd Bet. Blair Ave & Sutterville Rd Date: 9/23/2021 City: Sacramento, CA Day: T hursday
7:00 AM 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 8:30 AM 4:00 PM 4:30 PM 5:00 PM 5:30 PM 1 Sutterville Rd Sutterville Rd W No Parking Anytime 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Sutterville Rd Argail Way W No Restriction 49' 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Argail Way Meer Way W No Restriction 88' 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Meer Way Wentworth Ave W No Parking Anytime 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Wentworth Ave Potrero Way W No Restriction 278' 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Potrero Way Harian Way W No Restriction 214' 10 0 0 1 1 5 3 3 4 6 Potrero Way Harian Way W 30 Min Parking 8am-6pm 95' 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Harian Way Arica Way W No Parking Anytime 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Arica Way Oregon Dr W No Restriction 114' 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 9 Oregon Dr Fruitridge Rd W No Restriction 90' 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Fruitridge Rd Claudia Dr W No Restriction 401' 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Claudia Dr 35th Ave W No Restriction 164' 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 35th Ave 38th Ave W No Restriction 351' 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 38th Ave Kitchner Rd W No Restriction 239' 11 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 14 Kitchner Rd Hughes Ave W No Restriction 190' 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Hughes Ave McAllister Ave W No Restriction 231' 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 McAllister Ave Blair Ave W No Restriction 49' 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Blair Ave Dwy Exit E No Restriction 463' 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Dwy Exit Hughes Ave E No Restriction 246' 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Hughes Ave Kitchner Rd E No Restriction 480' 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Kitchner Rd 38th Ave E No Restriction 535' 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 38th Ave 35th Ave E No Restriction 515' 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 35th Ave Claudia Dr E No Restriction 509' 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Claudia Dr Fruitridge Rd E No Restriction 260' 13 0 0 0 1 3 3 4 1 24 Fruitridge Rd Murieta Way E No Parking Anytime 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Murieta Way Oregon Dr E No Restriction 202' 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 Oregon Dr Irvin Way E No Restriction 393' 19 1 1 1 2 14 13 14 13 27 Irvin Way Virginia Way E No Restriction 356' 17 0 0 0 2 6 4 4 4 28 Virginia Way Stacia Way E No Restriction 156' 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 29 Stacia Way 23rd Ave E No Restriction 131' 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 30 23rd Ave Meer Way E 15 Min Zone 25' 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 30 23rd Ave Meer Way E No Restriction 138' 6 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 31 Meer Way 20th Ave E No Restriction 215' 10 0 0 2 3 8 6 7 6 32 20th Ave 16th Ave E 1 Hr Parking 8am-6pm except Sat & Sun 101' 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 32 20th Ave 16th Ave E No Restriction 23' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 16th Ave 15th Ave E 1 Hr Parking 8am-6pm except Sat & Sun 232' 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 15th Ave Sutterville Rd E No Parking 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 361
time regulation 21 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
AM PM
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Parking Study
Measurement
(ft.)
Approximate Space
(Measurements
divided by 20')
Block Face
ID From To Res trictionSide of
the Street
APPENDIX A-1
FREEPORT BOULEVARD
TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
DESIGN LAYOUTS
APPENDIX F
FREEPORT BOULEVARD TRANSPORTATION PLAN
NORTHGATE BLVD
FREEPORT BLVD
21 3
NORTHGATE BLVD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT - DESIGN LA Y OUT
35THAVE.38THAVE.
KITCHNER
RD.
MCALLISTERAVE.
BLAIR AVE.
BLAIRAVE.
HUGHES
AVE. JACK IN
THE
BOX
AMF LAND
PARK LANES
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
NEW LAI WASH
SHEPARD OF
LIFE BAPTIST
CHURCHCHURCH OF
THE LIVING
GODAIRWAY
MARKET
JP THAI
KITCHEN
TOUCH N GO
CARWASHSKY RIDERSLEMARCUS
MALONE
RPM SMOG
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
TT
T
SS
S
S S
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
22'
11'7'
11'11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
11'8'
11'
5'
11'
11'
20'
11'
11'
11'8'
11'7'8'
11'11'
20'11'
11'
11'8'
11'8'
11'11'10' 10'
11'11'
11'8'
11'
8'
11'
12'
20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
WILL REQUIRE EASEMENT
FROM AIRWAY MARKET
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
7'
11'
11'
11'
11'
6'
10'
4' 11'
11'
11'
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 1 of 4 - From Blaire Ave. to 35th Ave.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS
11'
11'5'
11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'11'
11'
10'10'
11'22'
8'
11'11'
6'10'
8'
10'
5'
11'
22' 8'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'
8'
11'5'
11'11'20'
11'
11'
11'10'
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK
SPACE IS
CONSTRAINED
S
11'
11'
8'
11'
7'
10'
11'
11'7' 8'7'
SHARED CROSSING
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
35THAVE.38THAVE.
KITCHNER
RD.
MCALLISTERAVE.
BLAIR AVE.
BLAIRAVE.
HUGHES
AVE. JACK IN
THE
BOX
AMF LAND
PARK LANES
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
NEW LAI WASH
SHEPARD OF
LIFE BAPTIST
CHURCHCHURCH OF
THE LIVING
GODAIRWAY
MARKET
JP THAI
KITCHEN
TOUCH N GO
CARWASHSKY RIDERSLEMARCUS
MALONE
RPM SMOG
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
TT
T
SS
S
S S
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
22'
11' 7'
11'11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
11'8'
11'
5'
11'
11'
20'
11'
11'
11'8'
11'7'8'
11'11'
20'11'
11'
11'8'
11'8'
11'11'10'10'
11'11'
11'8'
11'
8'
11'
12'
20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
WILL REQUIRE EASEMENT
FROM AIRWAY MARKET
NEW / IMPROVED SIDEWALKS
7'
11'
11'
11'
11'
6'
10'
4' 11'
11'
11'
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 1 of 4 - From Blaire Ave. to 35th Ave.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS
11'
11'5'
11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'11'
11'
10'10'
11'22'
8'
11'11'
6'10'
8'
10'
5'
11'
22' 8'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'
8'
11'5'
11'11'20'
11'
11'
11'10'
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK
SPACE IS
CONSTRAINED
S
11'
11'
8'
11'
7'
10'
11'
11'7' 8'7'
SHARED CROSSING
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
PART 1 OF 6PART 2 OF 6PART 3 OF 6
BLAIR AVENUE TO KITCHNER ROAD
KITCHNER ROAD TO CLAUDIA DRIVE
CLAUDIA DRIVE TO OREGON DRIVE
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS S
11'
11'5'11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'10'
11'
22'
5'
11'11'
6'10'
7'
10'5'
11'
22'
5'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'7'
11'5'11'11'20'
11'
11'11' 10'
14'
6'
11'
11'
4'10'
11'
11'7'7'
8'
SHARED CROSSING
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS S
11'
11'5'11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'10'
11'
22'
5'
11'11'
6'10'
7'
10'5'
11'
22'
5'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'7'
11'5'11'11'20'
11'
11'11' 10'
14'
6'
11'
11'
4'10'
11'
11'7'7'
8'
SHARED CROSSING
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
SOUTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
SOUTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
SOUTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
SOUTH SEGMENT
BUFFERED
BIKE LANE
FREEPORT BOULEVARD TRANSPORTATION PLAN
NORTHGATE BLVD
FREEPORT BLVD
21 3
NORTHGATE BLVD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
SAFETY • MOBILITY • COMMUNITY
FREEPORT BL VD
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT - DESIGN LA Y OUT
MEERWAY
MEERWAY23RDAVE.
WENTWORTH
AVE
STACIAWAY
HARIAN WAY
IRVINWAY
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
SHIELAH WAY
VIRGINIAWAY
POTRERO
WAY THREE
SISTERS
HAIR DESIGN
LAND PARK
GOLD AND
SILVER
CHASE BANKTHE HABIT
BURGER GRILLBANK OF
AMERICA
EAST WEST
BANK
COMPLETE
TAX
ADVANTAGE
FREEWAY
INSURANCE
DISCOUNT
LIQUORS
BROHAM
SMOKE
SHOP GOODWILL
DONATION
CENTER
FREEPORT
CHASE
BANK
KING OF
CURLS
FREEPORT
FAMILY
DENTISTRY
RALEY'S
SWANSONS
CLEANERS
DOLLAR
TREE
RITE AID
OTO'S
MARKETPLACE
YOSHIMURA AUTO
SERVICES
NEW HONG
KONG WOK
HO CHIN
MARKET
BOBA
CAFE
ZEN DAY
SPAFAR EAST
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
S
S
S
11'5'
11'11'
20'
11'
11'
11'10'
8'
11'
8'
11'
11'
20'
11'
11'
11'
5'
15'6'
11'11'10' 6'11' 11'
11'8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
SHARED CROSSING
SHARED CROSSING
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKSNEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK
SPACE IS
CONSTRAINED
8'
S
11'
11'
8'
11'
7'
10'
11'
11'7' 8'7'
SHARED CROSSING
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 3 of 4 - From Oregon Dr. to Meer Way) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS
11'
11'5'
11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'11'
11'
10'10'
11'22'
8'
11'11'
6'10'
8'
10'
5'
11'
22' 8'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'
8'
11'5'
11'11'20'
11'
11'
11'10'
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK
SPACE IS
CONSTRAINED
S
11'
11'
8'
11'
7'
10'
11'
11'7'8' 7'
SHARED CROSSING
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
PART4 OF 6
OREGON DRIVE TO WENTWORTH AVENUE
15TH AVE.
SUTTERVILLERD.
16TH AVE.
20THAVE.
SUTTERVILLE
RD.
ARGAIL
WAY
MEERWAY
MEERWAY
WILLIAM LAND
GOLF COURSE
STARBUCKS
VALERO CHIPOTLE
MEXICAN
GRILL
HARRY A.
NAUMAN & SONPET'S
PARADISE
LAND PARK
SKI &
SPORTS
PLACER
TILE
SUSHI
CAFE
STAR KTV LOUNGE &
TEA HUB
BURGER
PATCH LAND
PARK
ELISSA'S
DREAM HAIR
THREE
SISTERS
HAIR DESIGN
LAND PARK
GOLD AND
SILVER
CHASE BANK
COMPLETE
TAX
ADVANTAGE
FREEWAY
INSURANCE
DISCOUNT
LIQUORS GOODWILL
DONATION
CENTER
SACRAMENTO
CITY
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
T
TT
SS
S
T
T
T
11'5'
11'
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
11'
11'6'
10'
6'
8'
11'
22'
11'
6'
11'11'
11'
11'
11'
8'
10'
11'
11'
11'
11'
10'
6'5'
3'
5'5' 9'
5'
13'
13'
5'3'
5'
4'
5'5'
SHARED CROSSING
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS PROPOSED IMPROVED SIDEWALK
12'
11'
11'
11'
5' 4'
6'
14' 14'
13'
13'
15'
MOUNTABLE
MEDIAN
8'
8'
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 4 of 4 - From Meer Way to Sutterville N) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
MEERWAY
MEERWAY23RDAVE.
WENTWORTH
AVE
STACIAWAY
HARIAN WAY
IRVINWAY
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
SHIELAH WAY
VIRGINIAWAY
POTRERO
WAY THREE
SISTERS
HAIR DESIGN
LAND PARK
GOLD AND
SILVER
CHASE BANKTHE HABIT
BURGER GRILLBANK OF
AMERICA
EAST WEST
BANK
COMPLETE
TAX
ADVANTAGE
FREEWAY
INSURANCE
DISCOUNT
LIQUORS
BROHAM
SMOKE
SHOP GOODWILL
DONATION
CENTER
FREEPORT
CHASE
BANK
KING OF
CURLS
FREEPORT
FAMILY
DENTISTRY
RALEY'S
SWANSONS
CLEANERS
DOLLAR
TREE
RITE AID
OTO'S
MARKETPLACE
YOSHIMURA AUTO
SERVICES
NEW HONG
KONG WOK
HO CHIN
MARKET
BOBA
CAFE
ZEN DAY
SPAFAR EAST
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
S
S
S
11'5'
11'11'
20'
11'
11'
11'10'
8'
11'
8'
11'
11'
20'
11'
11'
11'
5'
15'6'
11'11'10'6'11'11'
11'8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
SHARED CROSSING
SHARED CROSSING
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKSNEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS
SIDEWALK
SPACE IS
CONSTRAINED
8'
S
11'
11'
8'
11'
7'
10'
11'
11'7' 8'7'
SHARED CROSSING
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 3 of 4 - From Oregon Dr. to Meer Way) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
PART 5 OF 6
WENTWORTH AVENUE TO 20TH AVENUE
15TH AVE.
SUTTERVILLERD.
16TH AVE.
20THAVE.
SUTTERVILLE
RD.
ARGAIL
WAY
MEERWAY
MEERWAY
WILLIAM LAND
GOLF COURSE
STARBUCKS
VALERO CHIPOTLE
MEXICAN
GRILL
HARRY A.
NAUMAN & SONPET'S
PARADISE
LAND PARK
SKI &
SPORTS
PLACER
TILE
SUSHI
CAFE
STAR KTV LOUNGE &
TEA HUB
BURGER
PATCH LAND
PARK
ELISSA'S
DREAM HAIR
THREE
SISTERS
HAIR DESIGN
LAND PARK
GOLD AND
SILVER
CHASE BANK
COMPLETE
TAX
ADVANTAGE
FREEWAY
INSURANCE
DISCOUNT
LIQUORS GOODWILL
DONATION
CENTER
SACRAMENTO
CITY
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
T
TT
SS
S
T
T
T
11'5'
11'
11'
10'
10'
11'
22'
11'
11'6'
10'
6'
8'
11'
22'
11'
6'
11'11'
11'
11'
11'
8'
10'
11'
11'
11'
11'
10'
6'5'
3'
5'5' 9'
5'
13'
13'
5'3'
5'
4'
5'5'
SHARED CROSSING
NEW / IMPROVED
SIDEWALKS PROPOSED IMPROVED SIDEWALK
12'
11'
11'
11'
5' 4'
6'
14' 14'
13'
13'
15'
MOUNTABLE
MEDIAN
8'
8'
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 4 of 4 - From Meer Way to Sutterville N) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
20TH AVENUE TO SUTTERVILLE ROADPART 6 OF 6
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS S
11'
11'5'11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'10'
11'
22'
5'
11'11'
6'10'
7'
10'5'
11'
22'
5'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'7'
11'5'11'11'20'
11'
11'11' 10'
14'
6'
11'
11'
4'10'
11'
11'7'7'
8'
SHARED CROSSING
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
ARICA
WAY
ALMA WAY
OREGON
DR.
OREGONDR.
MURIETAWAY
FRUITRIDGE
RD.
FRUITRIDGERD.
CLAUDIA DR.
35THAVE.
BOBA
CAFE
DAHLIA
NAILS AND
SPA
GEM AUTO
WASH
CENTENNIAL UNITED
METHODIST CHURCH
LITTLE
CAESARS
PIZZA
CARL'S
JR
76 GAS
STATION
TUGBOAT
FISH &
CHIPS
MARK'S
CLEANERS
EVEREST
YOGURT
ROBERTA'S
COCINA
MEXICANA
BURGER
KING
TACO
BELL
WELLS
FARGO
BANK
MARIE
CALLENDER'S
SACRAMENTO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
SACRAMENTO BLACK
CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE
HONG KONG
ISLANDER
LANAI
BARBER
SHOP
JACK IN
THE
BOX
SACRAMENTO
EXECUTIVE
AIRPORT
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
S
SS S
11'
11'5'11'20'
11'
11'
11'
8'
11'5'
11'
11'
10'10'
11'
22'
5'
11'11'
6'10'
7'
10'5'
11'
22'
5'
17' 11'
10'
10'
11'
11'
6'
10'
5'7'
11'5'11'11'20'
11'
11'11' 10'
14'
6'
11'
11'
4'10'
11'
11'7'7'
8'
SHARED CROSSING
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
MISSING SIDEWALK
0 50' 100'25'
NORTHFREEPORT BOULEVARD PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (Part 2 of 4 - From 35th Ave. Dr. to Oregon Dr.) LEGEND
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
SIGNAL
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
TRANSIT STOP
IMPROVED SIDEWALK
T
PROPOSED/IMPROVED
CROSSWALK
S
EXISTING TREES
SOUTH SEGMENT
BUFFERED BIKE LANE
SOUTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
NORTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
SOUTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
NORTH SEGMENT
SEPARATED BIKEWAY
Attachment B: Bicycle Master Plan Amendments
Excerpt from the existing
Bicycle Master Plan
Freeport Boulevard Transportation
Plan Amendments
Separated Bikeway