City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2023-00402 5/30/2023 Consent Item 13.
Agreement for Regional Partnership with the County of Sacramento and Cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, and Rancho Cordova to Meet Senate Bill 1383 Edible Food Recovery Regulatory Requirements [Published for 10-day Review on 05/19/2023] File ID: 2023-00402
Location: Citywide
Recommendation: Pass a Motion authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to execute an agreement with the County of Sacramento and cities of Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Folsom, Galt, and Rancho Cordova for an initial two-year term with up to eight, one-year options to renew to form a regional partnership to meet certain Senate Bill (SB) 1383 edible food recovery regulatory requirements in an amount not to exceed $1,229,466 for the first two years, with a maximum not-to-exceed amount of $7,835,288.
Contact: Margaret Kashuba, Program Specialist, (916) 808-4806, [email protected]; Erin Treadwell, Waste Compliance Manager, (916) 808-4934, [email protected]; John Febbo, Integrated Waste General Manager, (916) 808-4949, [email protected]; Department of Public Works
Presenter: None.
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Agreement
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: California sends approximately 11.2 billion pounds of food to landfills each year, some of which is still fresh enough to be consumed, while approximately 9.2 million Californians were food insecure in 2020 (per California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, i.e. CalRecycle).
State Senate Bill (SB) 1383, which has been in effect since January 1, 2022, sets a statewide goal to recover at least 20% of currently disposed edible food for human consumption by 2025. To achieve this goal, SB 1383 requires commercial edible food generators such as grocery stores, food distributors, large venues, and large restaurants and hotels to contract with an edible food recovery
File ID: 2023-00402 5/30/2023 Consent Item 13.
organization or food recovery service to donate all unsold, edible food. Edible food is food that is intended for people to eat, including food not sold because of surplus, appearance, age, or freshness, and includes prepared food, packaged food, and produce. By requiring large businesses and venues to donate edible food that would otherwise be discarded, SB 1383 aims to address food insecurity throughout the state as well as reduce the amount of organic waste that is deposited in landfills. When organic waste breaks down in landfills, greenhouse gases such as methane are emitted that contribute to global climate change.
SB 1383 requires jurisdictions to identify commercial edible food generators, provide education, monitor compliance, conduct periodic edible food recovery capacity studies, and expand edible food recovery capacity as needed. To comply with these requirements, the City of Sacramento, Sacramento County, and the other cities within the County formed an Edible Food Recovery Working Group in 2021 and jointly contracted with R3 Consulting Group, Inc. (R3) to identify edible food generators and conduct a countywide edible food recovery capacity study in 2022 as required by SB 1383 to determine the capacity that currently exists in the region. The study found that additional capacity at edible food recovery organizations and services is needed to recover the amount of edible food expected to be diverted from the landfill under the new regulations to meet the statewide goals. Jurisdictions are required to create the additional capacity by providing the financing needed for organizations such as food banks and food pantries to expand their operations and accept additional edible food. R3 developed an implementation schedule for expanding edible food recovery capacity as required by SB 1383 that includes a work plan and initial program budget for expanding capacity regionally. This schedule was submitted to CalRecycle per the regulations.
The City desires to continue working with the County and the other cities to comply with edible food recovery capacity expansion requirements and establish a regional edible food recovery program through the approval of the attached agreement. The term of the agreement is for an initial two-year term with the option to extend the agreement by eight one-year terms. If approved, the agreement would formalize the existing Edible Food Recovery Working Group, which is comprised of representatives from each jurisdiction that would jointly participate in the program and capacity expansion.
Addressing food insecurity through a regional approach will provide residents in the City and across the county greater opportunities to access food. Each jurisdiction will contribute annual funding based on a 50/50 combination of the proportional share of its population and the number of commercial edible food generators operating within the jurisdiction to establish a program budget. The budget will be used to administer a grant program for edible food recovery organizations and services to expand their recovery capacity by: purchasing new equipment such as scales, refrigerators, and hand trucks; expanding their receiving space; or hiring additional staff. Funds will also go towards hiring an outside edible food recovery consultant who specializes in edible food recovery to manage the program as directed by the Edible Food Recovery Working Group, conducting periodic capacity studies mandated by SB 1383, and fund other edible food recovery activities as required.
Policy Considerations: SB 1383 requires jurisdictions to create the capacity needed to divert all edible
File ID: 2023-00402 5/30/2023 Consent Item 13.
food donated from commercial edible food generators and approval of this agreement is an efficient use of the City and regional resources to meet the State’s regulations related to edible food recovery capacity. SB 1383 requires counties to conduct periodic edible food recovery capacity studies and expand capacity if necessary. The participating jurisdictions concluded that forming a regional partnership will establish an edible food recovery program that benefits residents across the county, promotes information sharing, strengthens ties with community organizations, and supports commercial edible food generators in complying with the new regulations and achieving the statewide goals. The Edible Food Recovery Working Group will create and distribute countywide education and outreach to stakeholders, collaborate with edible food recovery organizations to identify needs and interest in tools that connect donors with recovery organizations, administer the capacity grant program, and build capacity with the support of the contracted edible food recovery consultant.
The Sacramento City Code Section 4.04.020 and Council Rules of Procedure (Chapter 7, Section E.2.d) mandate that unless waived by a two-thirds vote of the City Council, all labor agreements and all agreements greater than $1,000,000 shall be made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to council action.
Economic Impacts: None.
Environmental Considerations:
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): In accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, no environmental review is necessary because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the recommendation in this report may have a significant effect on the environment.
Sustainability: Expanding the edible food recovery capacity in the region will reduce the amount of edible food that is wasted and disposed of in landfills. Methane emissions resulting from the decomposition of organic waste in landfills are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global climate change.
Commission/Committee Action: None.
Rationale for Recommendation: Staff recommends the City partner with Sacramento County and the other cities within the County to work cooperatively to address food insecurity on a regional level.
Administering a joint program through this agreement will assist the City in achieving compliance with SB 1383 edible food recovery capacity expansion requirements, provide additional education and outreach to stakeholders through a regional campaign, connect commercial edible food generators with edible food recovery organizations, provide staff access to edible food recovery expertise, and create a robust edible food recovery program. Residents of one jurisdiction may seek resources from an edible food recovery organization in a neighboring jurisdiction and through a regional program, access to edible food will increase and the amount of edible food that is wasted will decrease. The cities of Elk Grove and Folsom have already brought the attached agreement to their respective city councils and received approval.
File ID: 2023-00402 5/30/2023 Consent Item 13.
Financial Considerations: The City’s annual contribution to the Edible Food Recovery Working Group program budget will be funded by existing revenue from commercial franchise waste hauler fees. Sacramento City Code section 13.24.260 stipulates that franchise fees shall be used to fund the administration and implementation of commercial waste programs.
The City will contribute a total of $1,229,466 for the initial two years of the program. Beginning Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26, an annual program work plan and budget will be developed by the Edible Food Recovery Working Group in coordination with the edible food recovery consultant and approved.
Because the actual program costs are not known, staff used the five-year average of the Consumer Price Index, 3.7%, as a cost escalator for each of the eight subsequent renewal years for a total not- to-exceed agreement amount of $7,835,288. The Consumer Price Index was chosen because the grants offered by the Edible Food Recovery Working Group will be to expand capacity at edible food recovery organizations through the purchase of new equipment such as scales, refrigerators, transport vehicles; expanding receiving space; or hiring additional staff.
Sufficient funding exists in the FY 2023/24 Department of Public Works, Recycling and Solid Waste Division Commercial Waste Compliance Budget (General Fund, Fund 1001) to execute this agreement through June 30, 2024. Funding for future years is subject to availability of funding in the adopted budget of the applicable fiscal year.
Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.
CONTRACT ROUTING SHEETContract Cover/Routing Form: Must Accompany ALL Contracts; however, it is NOT part of the contract.General Information (Required)Original Contract # (supplements only): ________ Supplement/Addendum #: ___________________Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): ________________________________________________________________Contract Effective Date: _________ Contract Expiration Date (if applicable): _________$ Amount (Not to Exceed): ______________________ Adjusted $ Amount (+/-): _____________________Other Party: ______________________________________________________________________________Project Title: _____________________________________________________________________________Project #: ____________________________________ Bid/RFQ/RFP #: ___________________________City Council Approval: if YES, Council File ID#: __________Contract Processing ContactsDepartment: ______________________________Contract Coordinator: _______________________Project Manager: _________________________________Department Review and Routing(Signature) (Date)(Signature) (Date)(Signature) (Date)(Signature) (Date)Special Instruction/Comments (i.e. recording requested, other agency signatures required, etc.)_______________________________________________________________________________________------------------FOR CLERK & IT DEPARTMENTS ONLY – DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE------------------
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTOSOCIAL SERVICESAGREEMENT FOR REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, AND CITIES OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, ELK GROVE, FOLSOM, GALT, RANCHO CORDOVA, AND SACRAMENTO TO MEET CERTAIN SB1383 EDIBLE FOOD RECOVERY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTSTHIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on July 1, 2023, by and between the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY,” and the CITIES OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, ELK GROVE, FOLSOM, GALT, RANCHO CORDOVA, AND SACRAMENTO, each a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to individually as “CITY” orcollectively as "CITIES.”RECITALSWHEREAS, the State of California passed Senate Bill 1383 (Chapter 395, Statutes of 1383; “SB 1383”), which required the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (“CalRecycle”) to adopt regulations to reduce organic waste by 50 percent from its 2014 baseline level by 2020 and 75 percent by 2025; andWHEREAS, CalRecycle has promulgated such regulations, which are now contained in chapter 12 (Short-lived Climate Pollutants) of division 7 of title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“SB 1383 Regulations”); andWHEREAS, SB 1383 establishes a statewide goal that not less than 20 percentof edible food that is currently disposed of is recovered for human consumption by 2025; andWHEREAS, SB 1383 Regulations require jurisdictions to, among other things, increase edible food recovery capacity and fund such actions, as necessary,for compliance; andWHEREAS, jurisdictions may designate a public or private entity to fulfill their responsibilities of the SB 1383 Regulations, except that the jurisdictions shall remain ultimately responsible for compliance in accordance with section 18981.2 of the SB 1383 Regulations; and County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITIES intend to implement an edible food recovery program through a coordinated Regional program rather than individual jurisdiction-specific programs; andWHEREAS, COUNTY and CITIES desire to enter into this Agreement to establish certain SB 1383 edible food recovery program roles and responsibilities under the terms and conditions set forth herein.NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter set forth, COUNTY and CITIES agree as follows:1.SCOPE OF SERVICESCOUNTY’s and CITIES’ respective obligations, service commitments, and requirements are described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.2.TERMThis Agreement shall be effective as of the date first written above and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2025. COUNTY Director and CITIES’Directors are authorized to amend this Agreement to extend the term for up to eight (8) additional one-year terms upon mutual written consent of the parties. Should any party desire not to exercise an optional term extension, said party shall give written notice to the other parties by January 1 of that year.3.NOTICEAny notice, demand, request, consent, or approval that any party may or is required to give the others pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be either personally delivered or sent by electronic mail (e-mail) or first class mail, postage pre-paid, addressed as follows:TO COUNTY:County of SacramentoDepartment of Health Services7001-A East Parkway, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95823Attn: Nick [email protected] CITY OF ELK GROVE:City of Elk Grove8401 Laguna Palms WayElk Grove, CA 95757Attn: Carlos Duque [email protected] CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS:City of Citrus HeightsGeneral Services Department6360 Fountain Square DriveCitrus Heights, CA 95621Attn: Regina [email protected] CITY OF GALT:City of Galt495 Industrial DriveGalt, CA 95632Attn: Robin [email protected] County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
TO CITY OF FOLSOM:City of FolsomWaste & Recycling Division50 Natoma StreetFolsom, CA 95630Attn: Sarah [email protected] CITY OF SACRAMENTO:City of SacramentoRecycling and Solid Waste Division2812 Meadowview Road, Bldg 1Sacramento, CA 95832Attn: Margaret [email protected] CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:City of Rancho Cordova2729 Prospect Park DriveRancho Cordova, CA 95670Attn: Steve [email protected] party may change the address or e-mail address to which subsequent notice and/or other communications can be sent by giving written notice designating a change of address to the other parties,which shall be effective upon receipt.4.FUNDING AND COMPENSATIONFunding and compensation under this Agreement shall be in accordance with Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.5.COUNTY DIRECTORAs used in this Agreement, "COUNTY Director" shall mean the Director of the Department of Health Services or his/her designee. COUNTY Director shall administer this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY, and has authority to make administrative amendments to this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY including, but not limited to, scope of services, pricing, management practices, etc. Unless otherwise provided herein or required by applicable law, COUNTY Director shall be vested with all the rights, powers, and duties of COUNTY herein. With respect to matters herein subject to the approval, satisfaction, or discretion of COUNTY or COUNTY Director, the decision of the COUNTY Director in such matters shall be final.6.CITY DIRECTORAs used in this Agreement, “CITY Director'' shall mean the following for each CITY:CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS – General Services Director or his/her designee.CITY OF ELK GROVE –Director of Public Works or his/her designeeCITY OF FOLSOM – City Manager County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
CITY OF GALT – Public Works Director or his/her designeeCITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA – Public Works Director or his/her designeeCITY OF SACRAMENTO – Public Works Director or his/her designeeEach CITY Director shall administer this Agreement on behalf of theirrespective jurisdiction, and has authority to make administrative amendments to this Agreement on behalf of said jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided herein or required by applicable law, a CITY Directorshall be vested with all the rights, powers, and duties of their respective jurisdiction herein. With respect to matters herein subject to the approval, satisfaction, or discretion of each CITY or CITY Director, the decision of the CITY Director in such matters shall be final.7.COMPLIANCE WITH LAWSA.COUNTY and CITIES shall observe and comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local law, regulations and ordinances.B.Economic Sanctions: Pursuant to California State Executive Order N-6-22 (Order) imposing economic sanctions against Russia and declaring support of Ukraine, COUNTY shall terminate any contract with any individual or entity that is in violation of the Order or that is subject to economic sanctions therein, and shall not enter a contract with any such individual or entity while the Order is in effect.8.GOVERNING LAWS AND JURISDICTIONThis Agreement shall be deemed to have been executed and to be performed within the State of California and shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of California. Any legal proceedings arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be filed in state or federal court located in Sacramento County, California. 9.STATUS OF PARTIESThere is no agency relationship between or among the parties. No party shall have authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of the other parties in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Notwithstanding anything contained herein, the employees of each party will continue to be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision and control of the employing party.10.INDEMNIFICATIONTo the fullest extent permitted by law, each of the parties shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other parties, their respective governing boards, officers, directors, officials, employees, and authorized volunteers and agents (collectively "indemnified parties"), from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, liabilities, County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
damages, and all expenses and costs incidental thereto (collectively "claims"), including cost of defense, settlement, arbitration, and reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting from injuries to or death of persons, including but not limited to employees of any party hereto, and damage to or destruction of property, or loss of use or reduction in value thereof, including but not limited to the property of any party hereto, arising out of, pertaining to, or resulting from the alleged or actual acts or omissions of their respective governing boards, officers, directors, officials, employees, volunteers, agents, or contractors.It is the intention of all parties that the provisions of this indemnity obligation be interpreted to impose on each party responsibility to the others for the acts and omissions of their governing boards, officers, directors, officials, employees, authorized volunteers and agents, or contractors. It is also the intention of the parties that, where comparative fault is determined to have been contributory, principles of comparative fault will be followed and each party shall bear the proportionate cost of any claims attributable to the fault of that party, its governing board, officers, directors, officials, employees, volunteers, agents, or contractors.The right to defense and indemnity under this section arises upon occurrence of an event giving rise to a claim and, thereafter, upon tender in writing to the indemnifying party or parties. The indemnifying party or parties shall defend the indemnified party or parties with counsel reasonably acceptable to the indemnified party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indemnified party or parties shall beentitled, on its own behalf, and at the expense of the indemnifying partyor parties, to assume control of its defense or the defense of any indemnified party in any legal action, with counsel reasonably selected by it. Should the indemnified party or parties elect to initially assume control of its defense, or the defense of any indemnified party or parties,it does so without prejudice to its right to subsequently request that the indemnifying party or parties thereafter assume control of the defense and pay all attorneys' fees and costs incurred thereby.This indemnity obligation shall not be limited by the types and amounts of insurance or self-insurance maintained by the parties.Nothing in this indemnity obligation shall be construed to create any duty to, any standard of care with reference to, or any liability or obligation, contractual or otherwise, to any third party.The provisions of this indemnity obligation shall survive the expiration or termination of the Agreement.
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
11.INSURANCECOUNTY and CITIES finance their liability, property, and workers' compensation risks through a combination of self-insurance and insurance. COUNTY and CITIES are knowledgeable of each entity's risk financing programs and agree to rely on these programs to pay for any liabilities, losses, costs, suits, acclaims, judgments, expenses, fines, or demands of any kind that may arise under the terms of this Agreement.12.ASSIGNMENTThis Agreement is not assignable by CITIES or COUNTY in whole or in part.13.AMENDMENT AND WAIVERExcept as provided herein, no alteration, amendment, variation, or waiver of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by all parties. Waiver by any party of any default, breach or condition precedent shall not be construed as a waiver of any other default, breach or condition precedent, or any other right hereunder. A party’s waiver of the other party’s breach of any term or provision in this agreement is not a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or provision. A waiver is binding only if set forth in writing and signed by the waiving party. No interpretation of any provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon COUNTY or CITIES unless agreed in writing by counsel for COUNTY and COUNTY’S Director, and each CITY’S Director and attorney for each CITY.14.SUCCESSORSThis Agreement shall bind the successors of COUNTY and CITIES in the same manner as if they were expressly named.15.TIMETime is of the essence of this Agreement.16.INTERPRETATIONThis Agreement shall be deemed to have been prepared equally by allparties, and the Agreement and its individual provisions shall not be construed or interpreted more favorably for any party on the basis that another party prepared it.17.DISPUTESIn the event of any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the parties shall attempt, in good faith, to promptly resolve the dispute mutually between them. If the dispute cannot be resolved by mutual agreement, nothing herein shall preclude any party’s right to pursue County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
remedy or relief by civil litigation, pursuant to the laws of the State of California.Except as required by section 10 above, the parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this agreement18.TERMINATIONA. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement without cause upon giving three hundred and sixty-five (365) calendar days’ prior written notice to the other parties pursuant to section 3. Notice shall be deemed served on the date of mailing.B. Pursuant to Exhibit B, section 1.C, any party may withdraw from this Agreement with cause upon giving written notice to the other parties by January 1 of any given year with an effective withdrawal date of July 1 of the following fiscal year.C. Pursuant to Exhibit B, section 1.D, any party that fails to meet its funding obligations shall withdraw from this Agreement by giving immediate written notice to the other parties with the date of the written notice serving as the effective withdrawal date.D. The withdrawing party shall continue to fully fund the Program and deposit monies into the Fund pursuant to Exhibit B until such withdrawal date takes effect, inclusive of any prorated funding amounts due up to the effective withdrawal date. The withdrawing party shall further forfeit any and all monies that it contributed to the Program, including any reserve balances.E. Upon the effective withdrawal date from this Agreement, the withdrawing party shall assume all SB 1383 edible food recovery regulatory requirements applicable to its jurisdiction, and all other responsibilities otherwise provided through this Agreement.19.PRIOR AGREEMENTSThis Agreement constitutes the entire contract between COUNTY and CITIES regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. Any prior agreements, whether oral or written, between COUNTY and CITIESregarding the subject matter of this Agreement are hereby terminated effective immediately upon full execution of this Agreement.20.SEVERABILITY If any term or condition of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person(s) or circumstance is held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application; to this end the terms and conditions of this Agreement are declared severable.
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
21.FORCE MAJEURENeither CITIES nor COUNTY shall be liable or responsible for delays or failures in performance resulting from events beyond the reasonable control of such party and without fault or negligence of such party. Such events shall include but not be limited to acts of God, strikes, lockouts, riots, acts of war, epidemics, acts of government, fire, power failures, nuclear accidents, earthquakes, unusually severe weather, acts of terrorism, or other disasters, whether or not similar to the foregoing, and acts or omissions or failure to cooperate of the other party or third parties (except as otherwise specifically provided herein). 22.SURVIVAL OF TERMS All services performed and deliverables provided pursuant to this Agreement are subject to all of the terms, conditions, price discounts and rates set forth herein, notwithstanding the expiration of the initial term of this Agreement or any extension thereof. Further, the terms, conditions and warranties contained in this Agreement that by their sense and context are intended to survive the completion of the performance, cancellation or termination of this Agreement shall so survive. 23.AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE Each person executing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized and has legal authority to execute and deliver this Agreement for or on behalf of the parties to this Agreement. Each party represents and warrants to the others that the execution and delivery of the Agreement and the performance of such party's obligations hereunder have been duly authorized.24.COUNTERPARTSThis Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts. The Agreement shall be deemed executed when it has been signed by all parties.Signatures scanned and transmitted electronically shall be deemed original signatures for purposes of this Agreement, with such scanned signatures having the same legal effect as original signatures. This Agreement may be executed through the use of an electronic signature and will be binding on each party as if it were physically executed.(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first written above.COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,apolitical subdivision of the State of CaliforniaBy: Timothy W. Lutz, Director Department of Health Services“COUNTY”Date: Agreement approved by the Board of Supervisors: Agenda Date: _________________Item Number:_________________Resolution Number: ____________Contract Reviewed and Approved by County Counsel:By: _________________________Julia Jackson, County CounselDate: _______________________CITY OF GALT,a municipal corporationBy: Lorenzo Hines Jr., City ManagerDate: APPROVED AS TO FORM:By: Frank Splendorio, City Attorney CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS,amunicipal corporationBy: Regina Cave, General Services DirectorDate: By: Ashley J. Feeney, City ManagerDate: APPROVED AS TO FORM:By: Ryan R. Jones, City AttorneyDate: ATTEST:By: Amy Van, City ClerkDate:
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
CITY OF FOLSOM,a municipal corporationBy: Elaine Andersen, City ManagerDate: Original Approved As To Content:By: Mark Rackovan, Public Works DirectorDate: Funding Available:By: Stacey Tamagni, Finance DirectorDate: Original Approved As To Form:By: Steven Wang, City AttorneyDate: ATTEST:By: Christa Freemantle, City Clerk Date:
CITY OF ELK GROVE,a municipal corporationBy: Jason Behrmann, City ManagerDate: APPROVED AS TO FORM:By: Jonathan P. Hobbs, City AttorneyDate: ATTEST:By:___________________________Jason Lindgren, City ClerkDate:
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,amunicipal corporationBy: Micah Runner, City ManagerDate: ATTEST:By: ____________________________Stacy Leitner, City ClerkDate:___________________________APPROVED AS TO FORM:By: ____________________________Adam Lindgren, City AttorneyDate:___________________________ CITY OF SACRAMENTO,a municipal corporationBy: For: Howard Chan, City ManagerDate: APPROVED AS TO FORM:By:____________________________City AttorneyDate: ____________________ATTESTBy: ___________________________City ClerkDate: ____________________Prepared by: ______________________________________________Kelli Sequest, Waste Management Program ManagerDepartment of Waste Management and RecyclingPhone: (916) 876-5393
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 1 of 9
EXHIBIT A to AgreementSCOPE OF SERVICES1. DEFINITIONSA.“Annual Program Work Plan” means the document that is prepared annually by the EFR Consultant with direction from the EFRWG that identifies planned tasks to be completed within the next fiscal year starting July 1st. The Annual Program Work Plan includes associated task schedules, and the entities responsible for completing those tasks.B.“Annual Program Budget” means the line item Program revenues and expenses, along with Program Fund balances, for the fiscal year starting July 1 and ending June 30.C.“Capacity Grants” means grants awarded by the EFRWG to Food Recovery Organizations, Food Recovery Services, and/or other entities for expenses related to the provision of Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity.D.“Capacity Study” means the study that is completed to satisfy edible food recovery capacity requirements set forth in section 18992.2 of the SB 1383 Regulations.E.“Edible Food Recovery (EFR) Consultant” means the third-party entity contracted by the COUNTY on behalf of the EFRWG to manage and administer the Program.F.“Edible Food Recovery Working Group (EFRWG)” means the Jurisdiction Contact and Jurisdiction Designated Representative of the COUNTY and CITIES who shall have overall responsibility for Program management and oversight of, and coordination with, the Program Manager.G.“Fee for Service Food Recovery Services” means a Food Recovery Service that uses a web-based platform to match businesses and events with surplus food to those in need. Their paid or contract drivers pickup and deliver the food to local shelters, after school programs, and other neighborhood food programs. Food Recovery Services may provide both on-demand and subscription service.H.“Food Justice” means a holistic and structural view of the food system that sees healthy food as a human right and addresses structural barriers to that right.I.“Food Recovery Organization (FRO)” means an entity that engages in the collection or receipt of edible food from commercial edible food generators and distributes that edible food to the public for food recovery either directly or through other entities including, but not limited to:
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 2 of 9
1.A food bank as defined in Health and Safety Code section 113783; 2.A nonprofit charitable organization as defined in Health and Safety Code section 113841; and 3.A nonprofit charitable temporary food facility as defined in Health and Safety Code section 113842.J.“Food Recovery Service” means a person or entity that collects and transports edible food from a commercial edible food generator to a Food Recovery Organization or other entities for food recovery. K.“Food Security” means that all people at all times, have physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious foods that meets their food preferences and dietary needs for an active and healthy life.L.“Jurisdiction Contact” means a member of the EFRWG with responsibility for working with the EFR Consultant on applicable Program issues and items on behalf of their jurisdiction. The Jurisdiction Contact may or may not be the Jurisdictional Designated Representative. There shall be one Jurisdiction Contact for the COUNTY and each CITY.M.“Jurisdiction Designated Representative” means a member of the EFRWG who has authority to act on behalf of their jurisdiction.N.“Program” means the coordinated countywide edible food recovery program that the COUNTY and CITIES intend to implement to comply with SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Requirements.O.“Program Expenses” means expenses related to the Program including but not limited to program management and administrative expenses, and funding for Capacity Grants.P.“Program Fund” means the fund to which the COUNTY and CITIESremit their agreed upon portion of the Annual Program Budget, and from which Program Expenses are paid.Q.“Real Time Donor and Recipient Matching Software” means software applications that allow businesses that have food available for sale or donation to post the availability of that food and for consumers or food distribution agencies or other neighborhood food programs to claim and receive that food for donation. Delivery of available food from the donor to the recipient is most commonly facilitated by volunteers, although the donating business or receiving party can also provide the necessary collection and delivery function. Such software is envisioned to serve as a component of the Program’s Tier 2 edible food recovery County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 3 of 9
capacity, provided an entity is identified that is willing to assume overall responsibility for that capacity.R.“SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Requirements” means article 10 of chapter 12 (Short-lived Climate Pollutants) of division 7 of title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.S.“SB 1383 Regulations” means chapter 12 (Short-lived Climate Pollutants) of division 7 of title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.T.“Tier 1 Commercial Edible Food Generator or Tier 1 Generator”means a commercial edible food generator that is one of the following:1.Supermarket.2.Grocery store with a total facility size equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet.3.Food service provider.4.Food distributor.5.Wholesale food vendor. U.“Tier 1 Edible Food Recovery Capacity” means the capacity needed to ensure that all Tier 1 Commercial Edible Food Generators have the ability to meet their regulatory requirement to arrange to recover the maximum amount of edible food that would otherwise be disposed.V.“Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generator or Tier 2 Generator”means a commercial edible food generator that is one of the following: 1.Restaurant with 250 or more seats, or a total facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. 2.Hotel with an on-site food facility and 200 or more rooms. 3.Health facility with an on-site food facility and 100 or more beds. 4.Large venue.5.Large event.6.A state agency with a cafeteria with 250 or more seats or a total cafeteria facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. 7.A local education agency with an on-site food facility. W.“Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity” means the capacity neededto ensure that all Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators have the ability to meet their regulatory requirement to arrange to recover the maximum amount of edible food that would otherwise be disposed.
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 4 of 9
2. COUNTYWIDE PROGRAM ELEMENTSThe Program requires developing, implementing, and funding, as necessary, additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity, and developing other required and/or agreed upon Program components.The EFRWG will secure required Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity through various methods, including providing funding for Capacity Grants.Tier 1 Edible Food Recovery Capacity will be achieved through a combination of resources, including existing non-profit recovery capacity, new non-profit recovery capacity, and potentially some level of Fee for Service Food Recovery Services.Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity will be initially achieved through Fee for Service Food Recovery Services. The EFRWG will also explore the development of a program that is based on Real Time Donor and Recipient Matching Software, as well as opportunities for developing and/or expanding Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity of existing Food Recovery Organizations in the County.3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDIBLE FOOD RECOVERY WORKING GROUPA. EFRWG Composition: The EFRWG is to be comprised of the COUNTY’s and each CITY’s Jurisdiction Designated Representative and Jurisdictional Contact. A Chair and Vice Chair shall be selected from among the Jurisdictional Designated Representatives in accordance with subsection D (Voting), below, of this section. The Chair and Vice Chair shall each represent a different jurisdiction and shall rotate between jurisdictions. The Chair shall serve for a one-year term, with the Vice Chair rotating into the Chair position after the initial one-year term.i. The Chair shall be responsible for scheduling meetings, setting agendas, and conducting meetings.ii. The Vice Chair shall act in the Chair’s stead if the Chair isunable to perform their duties, and ensure that accurate meeting minutes are taken and maintained by the EFR Consultant.B. EFRWG Meetings: Meetings shall occur no less than quarterly with the EFR Consultant to provide quarterly updates, conduct Program planning and take any other necessary or desired actions. In addition to Jurisdiction Designated Representatives and County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 5 of 9
Jurisdictional Contacts, other staff from the member jurisdictions consultants to the COUNTY and CITIES, and invitees of the COUNTY and CITIES may attend EFRWG meetings. EFRWG meetings may be conducted virtually.C. Overall Program Responsibilities: The EFRWG will have overall responsibility for administering the Program, procurement and oversight of the EFR Consultant, implementation of the approved Annual Work Plan, and other agreed upon short-, medium-, and long-term Program tasks. The EFRWG is not a “legislative body” as defined in Government Code section 54952, and are not subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act’s public meeting requirements. TheEFRWG’s purposes are operational and technical in nature, and EFRWG meetings are held to coordinate the responsibilities and assigned functions of COUNTY and CITIES established in this Agreement.D. Voting: As necessary, Program decisions, including but not limited to approval of the Annual Work Plan, Annual Program Budget, and Capacity Grant process will be based on the votes cast by each Jurisdiction Designated Representative. No action or recommendation of the EFRWG shall be valid unless a majority of the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives concurs, or unless another benchmark has been previously established and agreed to by a majority of the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives for determining the results of voting on a particular item (e.g.unanimous decision). A majority of the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of all EFRWG business, except that less than a quorum may vote to adjourn a meeting.COUNTY and each CITY shall have one vote for every 500,000 residents, or portion thereof. Votes shall be exercised by theJurisdiction Designated Representative. Based on the current population of the jurisdictions, the number of votes are as follows:Jurisdiction PopulationPercent of Total # of VotesCity of Citrus Heights87,811 6% 1City of Elk Grove 176,154 11% 1City of Folsom 81,610 5% 1 County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 6 of 9
City of Galt 25,849 2% 1City of Rancho Cordova78,381 5% 1City of Sacramento 510,931 33% 2County of Sacramento587,898 38% 2Total 1,548,634 100% 9The number of votes per jurisdiction shall be reviewed annually and adjusted, as necessary, based on the then-current populations of the participating jurisdictions, as reported by the California Department of Finance. E. Fiscal Year 2023/2024 and Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Annual Program Budget and Annual Program Work Plan: The Annual Program Budget (Attachment 1) and the Annual Program Work Plan (Attachment 2) for the initial two years of this Agreement are agreed upon with the approval of this Agreement by all parties.F. Develop and Approve Annual Program Budget and Annual Program Work Plan: Beginning with Fiscal Year 2025/2026, the EFRWG shall be responsible for developing the Annual Program Budget and Annual Program Work Plan, in coordination with the EFR Consultant. A preliminary Annual Program Budget and preliminary Annual Work Plan shall be approved by no later thanJanuary 1 each year for the following fiscal year (July 1-June 30).A final Annual Program Work Plan and final Annual Program Budget shall be approved by no later than October 1 each year for the current fiscal year (July 1-June 30). All Annual Work Plan and Annual Program Budget approvals and any amendments thereto shall be voted on pursuant to section D above. G. Capacity Planning: The EFRWG shall coordinate future required capacity planning, including the preparation of required implementation schedules, and associated reporting as required by section 18992.3 of the SB 1383 RegulationsH. Countywide Food Security Planning Coordination: The EFRWG shall coordinate with broader Food Security and Food Justice planning in Sacramento County as it deems appropriate.4. COUNTY AND CITIES RESPONSIBILITIESA. Jurisdiction Designated Representative and Alternate: COUNTY and each CITY shall designate a Jurisdiction Designated Representative who shall have voting authority on behalf of their County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 7 of 9
jurisdiction, and an alternate who shall have voting authority in the event the Jurisdiction Designated Representative is not available.B. Jurisdiction Contact: COUNTY and each CITY shall designate oneJurisdiction Contact with responsibility for working with the EFR Consultant on applicable Program issues and items, as directed by the EFRWG. The Jurisdiction Contact may or may not be aJurisdiction Designated Representative.C. Funding: COUNTY and each CITY shall establish funding mechanism(s) and remit their respective funding contribution of the Annual Program Budget to COUNTY pursuant to Exhibit B.D. Public Education and Outreach: COUNTY and each CITY shall be responsible for public education and outreach, as described in the SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Requirements and as such requirements apply to their respective jurisdictions, unless otherwise agreed to by the COUNTY and CITIES.E. Inspection and Enforcement: COUNTY and each CITY shall be responsible for inspection and enforcement, as described in SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Requirements and as such requirements apply to their respective jurisdictions, unless otherwise agreed to by the COUNTY and CITIES.F. Recordkeeping and Reporting: COUNTY and each CITY shall be responsible for recordkeeping and reporting, as described in SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Requirements and as such requirements apply to their respective jurisdictions, unless otherwise agreed to by the COUNTY and CITIES.5. EFR CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIESA. Oversight of Tier 1 Edible Food Recovery: The EFR Consultant, in coordination with the Jurisdiction Contacts, shall be responsible for creation of programs that increase Tier 1 Edible Food Recovery Capacity to regional Tier 1 Commercial Edible Food Generators.B. Oversight of Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery: The EFR Consultant, in coordination with the Jurisdiction Contacts, shall be responsible for creation of programs that increase Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity to regional Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators. C. Develop Annual Program Work Plan and Annual Program Budget:The EFR Consultant shall prepare and submit a preliminary Annual Program Work Plan and a preliminary Annual Program Budget tothe EFRWG for review and comment by November 1 each year for the following fiscal year (July 1-June 30) with final approval by the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives by no later than January 1 each year. Pursuant to the COUNTY and CITIES budget approval County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 8 of 9
processes, the EFR Consultant shall prepare and submit a finalAnnual Program Work Plan and a final Annual Program Budget for approval by the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives by no later than October 1 each year for the current fiscal year (July 1-June 30).D. Overall Program Development and Implementation: The EFR Consultant shall have responsibility for the management of all approved Annual Program Work Plan tasks, as directed by the EFRWG.E. Quarterly Meetings: The EFR Consultant shall facilitate meetings with the EFRWG at least quarterly, or more frequently as otherwise directed by the EFRWG. The EFR Consultant shall be responsible for preparing, at the Direction of the EFRWG Chair,meeting agendas and minutes for approval by the Jurisdiction Designated Representatives. Agendas shall include regular Program updates and any other appropriate Program issues or actions to be addressed by the EFRWG. Minutes shall include, at a minimum, a summary of program issues discussed, a clear description of any issues voted on, voting results, future action items, and attached budget summaries.F. Updating List of Tier 1 Commercial Edible Food Generators, Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators, Food Recovery Organizations, and Food Recovery Services: The EFR Consultantshall identify any known changes to the then current list of Tier 1 Commercial Edible Food Generators, Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators, Food Recovery Organizations, and Food Recovery Services and report that information to the EFRWG by October 1 each year.G. Pursuing Grant Funding Opportunities: The EFR Consultant shall be responsible for tracking and identifying grant funding opportunities, and shall prepare or otherwise facilitate grant applications that the EFRWG desires to pursue on behalf of the EFRWG to benefit the Program.H. Managing Capacity Grant Applications and Awards: The EFR Consultant shall be responsible for managing the Capacity Grant application and award process in conjunction with the EFRWG.6. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIESA. Contracting with EFR Consultant: COUNTY shall execute and administer the contract with the EFR Consultant on behalf of the COUNTY and CITIES. Tasks associated with contract administration include, but are not limited to, contract County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit APage 9 of 9
procurement, invoice processing and payment, and preparation of contract amendments.B. Managing of Program Related Funds: COUNTY shall create and maintain the Program Fund, fund centers, and cost centers necessary to support the Program’s revenues, expenditures, and fund balance. Tasks associated with the management of Program Fund include, but are not limited to, initial fund set-up, collection of funds, distribution of funds, and annual reporting of account activities to the EFRWG.C. Tracking and Reimbursement of COUNTY Costs: COUNTY shall track its costs associated with its Program responsibilities listed above and shall be reimbursed for such Program expenses asspecified in Exhibit B.7. CAPACITY GRANT APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESSThe EFRWG shall develop and administer a Capacity Grant application and award process to be managed by the EFR Consultant. Capacity Grants may be awarded for both additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity, as well as for costs related to existing Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity. Capacity Grant Funding is describedin Exhibit B.
County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit BPage 1 of 2
EXHIBIT B to AgreementFUNDING AND COMPENSATION1. COUNTY AND CITIES FUNDING RESPONSIBILITIESA. Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Fund the Program Among COUNTY and each CITY: The Annual Program Budget revenue commitment shall be allocated among the COUNTY and each CITYpursuant to Attachment 3 and based on the following allocation methodology:1. 50% of the agreed upon annual Program revenuerequirement will be allocated to the COUNTY and each CITYbased on their respective percentage of overall Countywide population as reported by the 2020 census; and2. 50% of the agreed upon annual Program revenuerequirement will be allocated to the COUNTY and each CITYbased on their respective percentage of the total number of Tier 1 and Tier 2 generators in the County that are located in their individual jurisdiction based on the most recently completed Tier 1 and 2 generator list published by the EFR Consultant on October 1 of each year.B. Annual Program Budget Revenue: COUNTY and each CITY shallcommit revenue to fund the Program according section 1.A above and remit 25% of their revenue commitment of the preliminary Annual Program Budget into the Program Fund by no later than August 1 each year, with the remaining portion pursuant to the approved final Annual Program Budget deposited by no later thanNovember 1 each year.C. Annual Program Budget Revenue Requirement In Excess of 10% From Prior Fiscal Year: Beginning in Fiscal Year 2025/2026, if an individual jurisdiction’s allocated annual revenue requirement for COUNTY or any CITY exceeds 110% of the prior year allocated annual revenue requirement, then said COUNTY or CITY may elect to withdraw for cause from the Agreement pursuant to section 18. D. Inability to Fund Allocated Revenue Requirement Amount: If COUNTY or any CITY is unable to fully fund its allocated annual revenue requirement, then said COUNTY or CITY shall withdraw from this Agreement pursuant to section 18,E. Non-Program Related Jurisdictional Edible Food Recovery Funding: Non-Program related funding, including grant funding, obtained by COUNTY or any CITY specific to Tier 1 or Tier 2 commercial edible food recovery and/or distribution capacity shall County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
Exhibit BPage 2 of 2
not be used by the respective jurisdiction to offset its Annual Program Budget funding requirement. COUNTY and/or any CITY shall still be obligated to fully fund their allocated revenue requirement amount. F. Grant Funding: Any grant funding obtained by COUNTY or any CITY with the assistance of the EFR Consultant shall be directed to the Program Fund and shall not be used by the respective jurisdiction to offset its Annual Program Budget funding requirement for the next fiscal year. COUNTY and/or any CITY shall still be obligated to fully fund their allocated revenue requirement amount. 2. CAPACITY GRANT FUNDINGA. Capacity Grant Funding: Funding for Capacity Grants shall be provided in the Annual Program Budget, as determined by the EFRWG. Any Annual Program Budget funding earmarked for Capacity Grants that are not awarded in the fiscal year they were budgeted shall be made available for Capacity Grant funding in future years, unless otherwise directed by the EFRWG.B. Equitable Distribution of Capacity Grant Monies: COUNTY and CITIES intend to distribute Capacity Grant monies among Food Recovery Organizations, Food Recovery Services and/or other entities that recover and/or distribute food recovered from Tier 1 or Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators in a manner that best supports optimizing commercial edible food recovery and distribution in the County, with consideration for equitably distributing Capacity Grant monies among those entities that apply for Capacity Grants.3. REIMBURSEMENT OF COUNTY PROGRAM COSTSCOUNTY shall be reimbursed for its Program costs associated with the tasks outlined in Exhibit A, section 6.COUNTY shall submit an expenditure itemization summary to the EFRWG on a quarterly basis. Billing shall reflect COUNTY administrative Program costs and/or pass-through EFR Consultant contract costs.All billing shall be based on current contract and/or labor rate schedulesthat will be updated annually. All invoices submitted by the EFR Consultant to COUNTY for payment will be submitted as pass through costs to the Program Fund.
ATTACHMENT 1 Year 1 Year 2Program Coordinator Annual Cost 200,000$ 200,000$ County Program Fund Administrative Costs $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Other Budgeted Program Costs [TBD] $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Tier 1 Additional Route Costs (Capacity Grants) 400,000$ 800,000$ Tier 2 Program Costs 25,000$ 100,000$ Existing Capacity Capital Replacement Costs (Capacity Grants)(1)500,000$ 500,000$ 2024 Capacity Study NA 50,000$ Total 1,500,000$ 1,975,000$ ANNUAL PROGRAM BUDGET(1) Assumes projected existing capacity capital costs of $2.5 million amortized over 5 years.
ATTACHMENT 2 Program Work PlanTask List ANNUAL PROGRAM WORK PLANPrimary Tasks Overall Program Planning1.Maintain a current list of all Tier 1 and Tier 2 commercial edible food generators 2.Maintain a current list of all FROS3.Draft and Issue RFP For County SB 1383 Edible Food Recovery Program Manager| Select Program Manager 4.Develop Capacity Grant Program 5.Initiate Ongoing Coordination with FROS, Food Distributors, and other Hunger Relief Organizations and Services in the County a. Issue FROS Informational Letter b. Issue T1 Capacity Letter of Interest – Capacity Grant Information c. Issue Letter of Interest to Local Non-Profits for the Operation of Real-Time Donor to Recipient Matching Edible Food Recovery Capacity 6.Coordinate with Jurisdictional Inspection and Enforcement Programs 7.Coordinate with Jurisdictional Tier 1 and Tier2 Commercial Edible Food Generator Public Education and Outreach Programs a. Strive for consistent Countywide information and branding Tier 1 Capacity Planning 8.Assess Available Recovery Capacity of Non-Profit FROS not Affiliated with SFBFS, and the need for Developing Additional Capacity. 9.Identify and assess Tier 1 Supermarket and Grocery Stores not in Compliance 10.Identify and assess Tier 1 Food Distributors and Wholesale Food Vendors not in Compliance 11.Award Tier 1 Capacity Grants to FROS 12.Roll-Out Services to all Tier 1 Generators Tier 2 Capacity Planning 13.Coordinate with Tier 2 Fee-for-Service Food Recovery Services and Develop / Implement Tier 2 Compliance Plan 14.Explore Potential to Develop/Expand Non-Profit Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity 15.Assess Potential for Implementing Real-Time Donor to Recipient Matching Softwarein Conjunction with Coordination with Letter of Interest (#8c above) Secondary Tasks Overall Program Planning 1.Coordinate with Feeding America / Regional Food Banks 2.Coordinate with the City of Isleton and Rancho Murieta CSD 3.Support / Advocate For Coordinated Countywide Food Security Planning FUNDING ALLOCATIONS ATTACHMENT 3$1.5 Millon Year 1 Budget$1.975 Millon Year 2BudgetResidents % of TotalYear 1 Year 2Citrus Heights 10 4% 17 9% 27 6% 87,811 6% Citrus Heights 6% 85,982$ 113,209$Elk Grove 23 8% 27 14% 50 11% 176,154 11% Elk Grove 11% 165,783$ 218,281$Folsom 13 5% 21 11% 34 7% 81,610 5% Folsom 6% 94,245$ 124,089$Galt 4 1% 2 1% 6 1% 25,849 2% Galt 1% 22,175$ 29,197$Rancho Cordova 13 5% 10 5% 23 5% 78,381 5% Rancho Cordova 5% 74,977$ 98,720$Sacramento 114 42% 62 32% 176 38% 510,931 33% Sacramento 35% 530,705$ 698,761$County 94 35% 56 29% 150 32% 587,898 38% County 35% 526,134$ 692,743$271 100% 195 100% 466 100% 1,548,634 100% Total 100%1,500,000$ 1,975,000$JurisdictionCollection Component50% - 50% AllocationDistribution ComponentTier 1 Tier 2Tier 1 + Tier 2PopulationJurisdiction