City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2022-01958 6/20/2023 Public Hearing Item 20.
Curtis Park Village PUD Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment (P22-025) [Noticed 06/09/2023] File ID: 2022-01958
Location: 2325 10th Avenue, District 7, Represented by Councilmember Jennings Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, adopt a Resolution: 1) approving use of Previously Certified Environmental Impact Report [previous Resolution No. 2010- 174] (no further documentation required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162, 15163, and 15164) and 2) amending the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan to designate the remaining ±2.5-acres of Flex Zone property for residential use.
Contact: Danny Abbes, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5873, [email protected], Marcus Adams, Senior Planner, (916) 808-5044, [email protected]; Community Development Department
Presenter: Danny Abbes, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5873, [email protected], Community Development Department
Property Owner/Applicant: PDC Construction Company, Inc. c/o Paul Petrovich, 825 K Street, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Background
3-Resolution: Curtis Park Village PUD Schematic Plan Amendment 4-Public Comment
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The applicant is proposing to designate the remaining ±2.5-acres of “Flex Zone” property within the Curtis Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) for residential use. The site is located at the northwest corner of Crocker Drive and 10 th Avenue in the Curtis Park neighborhood.
Per the Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines, adopted by City Council in 2010, the Flex Zone property must have a separate schematic plan prepared in the future for review and approval of the Planning and Design Commission and City Council before development occurs. There is no specific residential project proposed at this time; however, future residential development would be evaluated for
File ID: 2022-01958 6/20/2023 Public Hearing Item 20.
consistency with zoning and development standards.
Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments: As part of the application review process the proposal was routed to Civic Thread, Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, Preservation Sacramento, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Sierra Curtis Neighborhood Association, Land Park Community Association, and College Plaza Community Association. Early notice of the project was also sent out to property owners, occupants, and community groups within a 500-foot radius of the site.
Staff received an e-mail comment from the Sacramento Regional Transit District, e-mail comments from three individual members of the public, and one phone call from a member of the public. Each are briefly summarized below:
· Sacramento Regional Transit District submits that “Designating the remaining 2.5 acres for residential use would benefit future patrons that may reside here and rely on transit, as there is a nice pedestrian walkway near this project site over to the City College light rail station.” · Individual e-mail #1 requests that the site “would be an area to gather at - perhaps a restaurant of some sort.”
· Individual e-mail #2 opposes high density housing at the site. · Individual e-mail #3 suggests high density affordable housing at the site. · A phone call suggested that the site should include affordable housing.
All e-mail comments can be found within Attachment 4 of the report.
Two individuals provided public testimony during the Planning and Design Commission. The first caller voiced support for housing development at the site. The second caller requested that the project include affordable housing units.
Staff response: There is no requirement to construct additional affordable housing units at the site.
Pursuant to City Code chapter 17.712 that specifies a residential project subject to an inclusionary housing plan approved prior to the effective date of the ordinance adopting the current chapter
17.712 (Ord 2015-0029), may either:
1. Comply with the approved inclusionary housing plan; or
2. Comply with the provisions of this chapter.
In 2010, an inclusionary housing plan was approved as part of the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development by City Council which based on a total of up to 527 units required 79 affordable units.
The development constructed 90 senior affordable housing units for a term of 30 years on the immediately adjacent Flex Zone parcel 1 site. The developer has complied with the approved Inclusionary Housing Plan and provided the necessary onsite affordable units to address the
File ID: 2022-01958 6/20/2023 Public Hearing Item 20.
construction of up to 527 residential units. If more than 527 units are built within the PUD, those additional units would be subject to Housing Impact Fee requirements.
Notification of this hearing was also sent to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the site, and the site was posted with contact information for project inquiries, as well as the date, time, and participation details for the project hearing.
Policy Considerations: The General Plan designation for the subject site is “Traditional Center.” Sacramento’s Traditional Centers are a critical element of sustainable, walkable traditional neighborhoods that provide essential daily services within walking distance of surrounding residents.
The General Plan goals and policies below support the proposed project.
Goal LU 1.1: Growth and Change. Support sustainable growth and change through orderly and well-planned development that provides for the needs of existing and future residents and businesses, ensures the effective and equitable provision of public services, and makes efficient use of land and infrastructure.
Policy LU 1.1.4: Leading Infill Growth. The City shall facilitate infill development through active leadership and the strategic provision of infrastructure and services and supporting land uses.
Policy LU 1.1.5: Infill Development. The City shall promote and provide incentives (e.g., focused infill planning, zoning/rezoning, revised regulations, provision of infrastructure) for infill development, reuse, and growth in existing urbanized areas to enhance community character, optimize City investments in infrastructure and community facilities, support increased transit use, promote pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhoods, increase housing diversity, ensure integrity of historic districts, and enhance retail viability.
Goal LU 4.1: Neighborhoods. Promote the development and preservation of neighborhoods that provide a variety of housing types, densities, and designs and a mix of uses and services that address the diverse needs of Sacramento residents of all ages, socio-economic groups, and abilities.
Policy LU 4.1.1: Mixed-Use Neighborhoods. The City shall require neighborhood design that incorporates a compatible and complementary mix of residential and nonresidential (e.g., retail, parks, schools) uses that address the basic daily needs of residents and employees.
Goal LU 5.1: Centers. Promote the development throughout the city of distinct, well-designed mixed-use centers that are efficiently served by transit, provide higher density, urban housing opportunities and serve as centers of civic, cultural, and economic life for Sacramento’s neighborhoods and the region.
File ID: 2022-01958 6/20/2023 Public Hearing Item 20.
Policy LU 5.1.1: Diverse Centers. The City shall encourage development of local, citywide, and regional mixed-use centers that address different community needs and market sectors, and complement and are well integrated with the surrounding neighborhoods.
Staff finds the project is consistent with the above goals and policies in that the project will facilitate future residential development that will 1) occupy a vacant urban infill site that maximizes existing street and utility infrastructure, 2) position residences in close proximity to supporting land uses including a college, commercial services, and park and recreation space, 3) support increased transit use and promote a pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, and 4) enhance local retail viability.
The project site is within the Land Park Community Plan area; no community plan policies address the subject site.
Economic Impacts: Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations: The Curtis Park Village EIR was certified by the City Council in Resolution No. 2010-174, and the CEQA Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan were adopted in Resolution No. 2010-572. These actions were taken as part of the approval of the Curtis Park Village project on April 1, 2010. The environmental documents are posted at:
<https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Planning/Environmental/Impact- Reports>
The Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment requests approval of discretionary permits that are required by the Planned Unit Development Guidelines that were approved on April 1, 2010, and site plan and design review, which is required under the City’s Planning and Development Code. These actions are subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the site and falls within the types of uses that were considered in the impact analysis in the Draft EIR. This project’s review proceeds under CEQA Guidelines section 15162, including an inquiry as to whether the proposed use would result in new significant effects on the environment that were not considered in the EIR. Staff have concluded that none of the conditions set forth in section 15162 would occur, and that the EIR is adequate to evaluate any of the impacts that could occur as a result of project approval.
The Mitigation Monitoring Plan, adopted in Resolution No. 2010-572, will apply to the construction and operation of the tentative map.
200-Year Flood Protection
: State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810 require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that new development will have protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by SAFCA’s Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project.
File ID: 2022-01958 6/20/2023 Public Hearing Item 20.
Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the local flood management agency, SAFCA, has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will ensure protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. This is based on the SAFCA Urban level of flood protection plan, adequate progress baseline report, and adequate progress toward an urban level of flood protection engineer’s report that were accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-0226 on June 21, 2016, and the SAFCA 2022 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-0313 on October 11, 2022.
Commission/Committee Action: On September 22, 2022, the Planning and Design Commission held a public hearing and passed a motion recommending the City Council adopt a Resolution to amend the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan to designate the remaining ±2.5-acres of Flex Zone property for residential use.
Rationale for Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Schematic Plan Amendment to the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development to designate the remaining ±2.5-acres of “Flex Zone” property for residential use. Staff supports the proposed amendment since it will allow for needed housing at an urban infill site that will 1) provide future residents convenient access to Sacramento City College, Curtis Park, and commercial services, 2) support increased transit use and promote a pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, and 3) enhance local retail viability.
Financial Considerations: Not applicable.
Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.
Background Information and Surrounding Land Use Context The subject site consists of one vacant ±2.5-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Crocker Drive and 10th Avenue within the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Curtis Park Village PUD, adopted in 2010 by City Council, is a 72-acre area south of Sacramento’s central city surrounded to the north and east by residential neighborhoods, to the south by light industrial development across Sutterville Road, and to the west by Sacramento City College. A majority of the area is already developed and includes thousands of square feet of commercial development and hundreds of housing units.
Figure 1: Aerial View of Subject Site and Surroundings (Google) Two parcels totaling 5 acres were designated as “Flex Zone” property within the PUD (Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 on Figure 1). Per the Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines, the Flex Zone was initially created “in recognition that development in this area is not expected to occur for a number of years and market conditions will likely change during this period of time.” Rather than establish a land use for the Flex Zone parcels in 2010, the City Council determined that the schematic plan should be amended in the future
and may include residential, commercial, office and/or public/open space uses. The applicant is now proposing the site be developed with residential uses.
Approximately half of the Flex Zone area (Parcel 1), located immediately west of the subject site, was approved for a 91-unit senior apartment complex (P13-023). The apartment project completed construction in 2016. In late 2016, an application was submitted to construct a ±40,000 square foot retail building on Parcel 2 (the current subject site) and was later withdrawn (DR16-329). Now, the applicant is proposing to designate Parcel 2 for residential use.
Two prior Curtis Park Village Schematic Plan Amendments have been approved (P12- 026; P15-027) and involved reconfigurations of housing parcels, detention basin and park land, and alterations to road layout and design.
According to available permit records and historic aerial imagery, the Flex Zone Parcel 2 (subject site) has never been developed.
Entitlement Review
Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan Amendment:
The proposed designation of the site for residential use would preclude any commercial or industrial uses unless another schematic plan application is submitted for review.
Staff believes residential is an optimal use of the site since the area already includes plentiful restaurant, retail and commercial service uses. Future residential site development will provide a quality living environment within walking distance to Sacramento City College, Curtis Park, the City College light rail transit station, and shopping and service needs. Furthermore, residential development will enhance the vitality of local commercial space.
Permitted residential uses within the Shopping Center zone include multi-unit dwellings, dormitories, and residential care facilities. Single-unit or duplex dwelling development, a fraternity or sorority house, a mobile home park, or temporary residential shelter would require approval of a Conditional Use Permit at a public hearing by the Planning and Design Commission.
Future Site Development
There is no site development proposed at this time for the subject flex zone Parcel 2.
Site development will be subject to a future Site Plan and Design Review entitlement and will be evaluated for consistency with the planning and development code standards of the Shopping Center (SC-PUD) zone and Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development Guidelines.
The Traditional Center General Plan designation establishes a minimum allowed density of 15 dwelling units per net acre; the Shopping Center zone establishes a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per net acre.
The site has existing infrastructure improvements including a 6-foot separated sidewalk along the Crocker Drive frontage, 6-foot sidewalks along 10th and Omaha Beach Avenues, and an alley between the site and senior apartments site to the west.
Table 1: Site Information for Future Development
Project Area: ±2.5 acres
Existing Zoning/Use: Shopping Center (SC-PUD) / vacant
Proposed Future Use: Residential
General Plan Designation: Traditional Center (15 – 36 dwelling units per net acre) SC Zone Allowed Density: Maximum 30 dwelling units per net acre Allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 0.3 – 2.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2022 –
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
June 20, 2023
AMENDING THE CURTIS PARK VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) SCHEMATIC PLAN (P22-025)
BACKGROUND
A. On September 22, 2022, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project (P22-025), which includes the proposed amendment to the Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines to designate the remaining ±2.5-acres of Flex Zone property for residential use, as set forth in Exhibit A; and
B. On June 20, 2023, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 (2)(b).
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
A. Findings of Fact related to the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment (P22-025) as included in the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development (P04-109) Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project:
1. The City Council finds as follows:
a. On April 1, 2010, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §21000 et seq. (“CEQA”), the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.), and the City of Sacramento environmental guidelines, the City Council certified an environmental impact report (EIR) (Resolution No. 2010-174). On September 28, 2010, the City Council then after having reviewed and considered the information contained in the certified EIR, adopted findings of fact and findings of overriding consideration, adopted a mitigation monitoring program (Resolution No. 2010-572), and approved the Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development (P04-109) (Original Project).
b. The Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project (P22-025) (Current Project) proposes to designate the remaining ±2.5- acres of Flex Zone property for residential use.
c. Staff determined that there are no proposed changes to the Original Project that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR.
2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the previously certified EIR for the Original Project, and all oral and documentary evidence received during the hearing on the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project. The City Council has determined that the previously certified EIR, CEQA findings of fact and statement of overriding considerations constitute an adequate, accurate, objective, and complete review of the proposed Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project and finds that no additional environmental review is required based on the reasons set forth below:
a. No substantial changes are proposed by the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project that will require major revisions of the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
b. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project will be undertaken which will require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
c. No new information of substantial importance has been found that shows any of the following:
i. The Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan
Amendment Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR;
ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previously certified EIR;
iii. Mitigation measures previously found to be infeasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project; or
iv. Mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previously certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment.
3. No further documentation is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15162, 15163, and 15164. The mitigation monitoring program for the Project remains in effect and shall apply to the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project. The mitigation monitoring program meets the requirements of CEQA section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091.
4. Upon approval of the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment, the applicant shall file or cause to be filed a Notice of Determination with the Sacramento County Clerk and, if the project requires a discretionary approval from any state agency, with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to section 21152(a) of the Public Resources Code and the State EIR Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.
5. Pursuant to Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its decision, including the previously certified EIR, are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 915 I Street, Sacramento, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City Council.
B. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Curtis Park Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment Project, the City Council approves the amendment to the Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines. The City Council approves the amendment based on the following Findings of Fact:
1. The amendment to designate the remaining Flex Zone property for residential use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation and with the goals, policies, and other provisions of the General Plan, in that 1) the Traditional Center General Plan land use designation allows for residential uses, 2) the proposed residential land use will occupy a vacant urban infill site that maximizes existing street and utility infrastructure in close proximity to supporting land uses including a college, commercial services, and park and recreation space, will support increased transit use and promote a pedestrian and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, and will enhance local retail viability, and 3) future site development will be subject to development standards of the SC zone and Curtis Park Village Planned Unit Development Guidelines.
2. The amendment promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the city by allowing for the development of residences that will be within convenient walking distance of park and recreation space, commercial needs, and transit.
3. The schematic plan amendment is consistent with the zoning designation of the subject site in that the Shopping Center (SC-PUD) zone allows for residential use.
4. The project site is within an area for which the local flood-management agency has made adequate progress (as defined in California Government Code section 65007) on the construction of a flood-protection system that, for the area intended to be protected by the system, will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban areas for property located within a flood-hazard zone, as demonstrated by the SAFCA Urban Level of Flood Protection Plan and Adequate Progress Baseline Report and the SAFCA Adequate Progress Toward an Urban Level of Flood Protection Engineer’s Report, each accepted by the City Council on June 21, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016- 0226), and the SAFCA 2022 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by the City Council on October 11, 2022 (Resolution No. 2022-0313).
C. The Schematic Plan for the Curtis Park Village PUD is amended as shown in Exhibit A.
D. Exhibit A is part of this Resolution.
Table of Contents:
Exhibit A: Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines Schematic Plan Amendment (to be added as an addendum to the current Curtis Park Village PUD Guidelines Schematic Plan)
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on June 20, 2023, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Attest:
From: Sarah Poe
To: Daniel Abbes
Subject: RE: Project Routing: P22-025, Crocker Village Flex Zone Schematic Plan (2325 10th Avenue) Date: Monday, August 15, 2022 4:27:47 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Hi there,
SacRT has no objection to the proposed amendment to the Curtis Park Village PUD.
SacRT feels that
designating the remaining 2.5 acres for residential use would benefit future patrons that may reside here and rely on transit, as there is a nice pedestrian walkway near this project site over to the City College LRS! From: Amanda
To: Daniel Abbes
Subject: Re: DR21-221 : 2100 Portola Way - Crocker Village Date: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:28:17 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image001.png
Hi Daniel,
My apologies, it is not 2100 Portola way, but instead is the lot on Omaha Beach and Crocker Dr. We saw the ‘pending development’ sign up and wanted to see what the plans were for this.
Are there any plans for this space? Us and other Crocker Village residents were hoping it would be an area to gather at - perhaps a restaurant of some sort.
Appreciate you getting back to me. Thank you!
Regards,
Amanda
On Sep 16, 2022, at 10:12 AM, Daniel Abbes <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Amanda,
Thanks for the e-mail. I wanted to confirm the location you were talking about. The e- mail subject line says 2100 Portola Way but you seem to be referencing the lot that’s next to the senior apartments at the northwest corner of Crocker Drive and 10th Avenue.
If you’re referring to the lot described above, I will include your e-mail as part of the public comment for the upcoming hearing. The hearing agenda and project report can be found online here: http://sacramento.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php? view_id=21&event_id=4469
Thanks,
Danny Abbes, Associate Planner
City of Sacramento | Community Development Department
300 Richards Boulevard, 3
rd Floor
(916) 808-5873; [email protected]
image001.png
Advisory: All-electric NEW construction requirements begin on January 1, 2023!
From: Planning <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 4:00 PM
To: Amanda <[email protected]>; Daniel Abbes
<[email protected]>
Subject: DR21-221 : 2100 Portola Way - Crocker Village
Hello @Amanda
,
This corner lot is zoned Residential.
@Daniel Abbes
is the assigned Planner for DR21-221. Daniel can you please provide a status update?
Description
of Work:
A request to construct a house on lot 24 within the Crocker Village development, an approximately 0.15-acre parcel in the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) Zone and Curtis Park Planned Unit Development.
Kind regards,
Pamela Morgan on behalf of City Planning
Associate Planner
City Planning Division
300 Richards Blvd., Suite 300, Sacramento CA 95811
Open by appointment only.
City Operator 311 or 916-264-5011
Advisory: All-electric NEW construction requirements begin on January 1, 2023! TO LOOK UP ZONING, design review districts, historic districts, parking district, SPD etc. please copy this link into your URL:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?
id=6f8e021cb286482b9a649e33ac6e67ea
-----Original Message-----
From: Amanda <[email protected]
>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 2:20 PM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: 2100 Portola Way - Crocker Village
Hi there,
We are writing to inquire about the open space near the Safeway/nearby shopping center across from the Brownstone town homes and within the Crocker Village. We were hoping the space would be something for the community- perhaps a restaurant or something for the neighborhood to gather at. I see on the pending list there are ideas that it will be developed to a possible home site. Please give this a second thought and instead put something in for the community. Us and many other Crocker Village residents are concerned and have also been waiting for the park to continue its development as well.
Please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you!
916-805-9851
Best regards,
Amanda
From: jill julian
To: Daniel Abbes
Subject: Curtis Park Village PUD Flex Zone Schematic Plan Amendment P22-025 Date: Thursday, September 22, 2022 9:55:51 AM
Dear Sirs,
I live across the street from the proposed Curtis Park Village PUD Flex Zone Planned Amendment at 2325 10th Ave. I oppose changing the designated 2.5 acres to residential use. I understand there are no proposed development plans for this site as of yet, so I fear that the development company will try to build high density housing on this property. Crocker Drive is already becoming a very busy commuter street. I’ve already witnessed multiple accidents and near misses along both Crocker Drive and 10th Ave. Mr. Petrovich told us during an HOA meeting that he had 85 degree C signed up for that area. Please do not allow the development change without any plans.
Keeping to the original plan submission and agreement seems best for the community for now.
Thank you,
Jill Julian
Sent from my iPhone
From: Kathleen Ave
To: Daniel Abbes
Subject: CPV flex zone PUD amendment
Date: Saturday, October 15, 2022 9:51:30 AM
Importance: High
Hi Danny -
I just watched the Planning & Design Commission hearing from 9/22 on the proposed CPV Flex Zone PUD Amendment. I don’t see the item posted on the October 18 City Council Agenda. Can you let me know when it will be heard?
I am a Curtis Park resident and strongly in support of using that ENTIRE area for affordable housing. Planning for that area was intended to respond to "future conditions” and now it is abundantly clear that affordable housing and more density there is essential. I will submit comments and encourage my neighbors to do so as well. But need to know when the hearing will be!
Thank you for the information!
Kathleen Ave