Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023

City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.

Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (P21-042) [Noticed on 9/29,2023; Passed for Publication 10/03/2023; Published 10/5/2023]
File ID: 2023-01035
Location: Northeast of Cosumnes River Boulevard and 24
th Street Intersection, APNs 053-0010-048,
053-0010-049, 053-0010-076, 119-0080-001, 119-0080-051, 119-0090-016; District 8, Represented by Mayor Steinberg
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, adopt: a) the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development; b) a Resolution amending the 2035 General Plan to redesignate the site to 66± acres of Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, 30.8± acres of Park and Recreation, 10.6± acres of Public Quasi Public, 26.1± Urban Neighborhood Medium Density, and 7.2± Traditional Center; c) an Ordinance rezoning 140.7± gross acres from the Single-Unit (R-1) and Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling zone (R-1A) to the Limited Commercial zone (C-1-PUD), Multi-Unit Dwelling zone (R -2A-PUD and R-4-PUD) and Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development; d) a Resolution adopting the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Schematic Plan; e) a Resolution approving an amendment to the 2016 Bicycle Master Plan; f) a Resolution approving a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 140.7± gross acres into 452 lots, with design deviations to street cross- sections, intersection spacing, and cul-de-sac length; g) a Resolution approving Site Plan and Design Review of the Maps and Tree Permit to remove six private protected trees; h) a Resolution for a Water Supply Assessment Report for the Stone Beetland project .

Contact: Marcus Adams, Senior Planner, (916) 808-5044, [email protected]; Angel Anguiano, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5519, [email protected]; Community Development Department
Presenters: Angel Anguiano, Associate Planner, Community Development Department; Nick Avdis, Avdis & Cucchi, LLP
Applicant: Nick Avdis,
Avdis & Cucchi, LLP
1415 L Street, Suite 41
Sacramento, CA 95818
Owner: Clifton Taylor

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.

JP Land Holdings LLC
1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100
Roseville, CA 95661
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Background
3-Resolution - Environmental Determination: Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 4-Exhibit A - Mitigation Monitoring Plan
5-Resolution - Amendment to General Plan Land Use Designation 6-Exhibit A - General Plan Amendment Map
7-Ordinance - Rezone
8-Exhibit A - Rezone Map
9-Resolution - Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development and Schematic Plan 10-Exhibit A - Stone Beetland PUD and Schematic Plan
11-Resolution - Amendment to the Bicycle Master Plan
12-Exhibit A - Bicycle Master Plan Amendment Map - Mobility Framework 13-Resolution - Project Entitlements
14-Exhibit A - Tentative Subdivision Map
15-Exhibit B - Design Deviation Request Memo
16-Exhibit C: Tree Permit Application
17-Resolution - Water Supply Assessment
Description Analysis
Issue Detail: The Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (PUD) project is a request by the applicant for the necessary entitlements to allow for future development that covers approximately 140.7 acres in the South Sacramento area and adjacent to the Morrison Creek Regional Transit light rail station. The PUD will create a new neighborhood with a minimum of 1,106 dwelling units, ranging from attached and detached single-unit dwellings to high density multi-unit dwelling housing. There is a commercial/mixed use block that provides space for commercial uses compatible with nearby residential. Amenities such as open space, recreation areas, and pedestrian and bicycle paths have been carefully incorporated into the land use plan to maximize the proximity to the nearby light rail station. The proposed mobility network will connect to existing neighborhoods and the larger City active transportation network. The project also includes 198 units of affordable housing, representing nearly 20% of the overall unit count.

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.

Stone Beetland is considered a Transit Priority Project (TPP) near public transportation (Morrison Creek Regional Transit light rail station). A TPP is a type of project created under SB375 and Public Resources Code section 21155, which sets forth the requirements for a project to qualify as a TPP. A TPP project must meet the following criteria:

1. At least 50% of the total site must be designated for residential use.

2. Be consistent with the use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies of the regional sustainable community’s strategy.

3. Be located within ½ mile of a transit corridor included in the regional transportation plan.

4. Achieves a minimum of 20 dwelling units to the net acre.

Consistent with the Transit Priority Project criteria, the project is primarily residential, with density and intensity of the proposed land uses being highest at the eastern edge adjacent to the transit stop and gradually decreases towards the north and west.

The tentative maps lay out the design of the neighborhood, identifying the location of new streets, parks and open space, trails, and developable lots. There are no house plans, multi-family, or commercial development plans proposed at this time.

Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments
As part of the application review process, the proposal was routed to surrounding community groups including the adjacent Detroit Community Association, Deerfield/Mesa Grande Neighborhood Association, Pocket Greenhaven Community Association, and Preservation Sacramento, Sacramento AREA Bicycle Advocates, Sacramento Housing Alliance, and CivicThread. City staff received letters from Detroit Community Association and CivicThread (Attachment 20). The site has been posted and all property owners and neighbors within a 500-foot radius of the subject site were notified of the hearing. Below is a summary of the comments received.

Detroit Community Association
The comments from Detroit Community Association includes overall support for the project and the “diverse housing options, including transit-oriented development, in the pipeline.” However, the letter expressed some reservations regarding the potential of new traffic; the letter provides five recommendations:

1. Developer, City and Detroit neighborhood to further explore and analyze impacts of new vehicle and pedestrian connections to the Detroit neighborhood.

2. Developer and City to be transparent and continue actively engaging the Detroit neighborhood on general development, traffic impacts, and changes to the application/plan.

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.

3. Explore traffic mitigation measures, including new traffic calming such as bulb-outs, stop signs, speed lumps, and lighted crosswalks both in Detroit and Stone Beetland.

4. Prohibit construction vehicles in the Detroit neighborhood, unless when absolutely necessary on a limited basis, and in such cases provide street cleaning and repair when necessary, including following all Sac Metro Air District rules and regulations.

5. Explore construction of larger park in North Village due to lack of City-owned park in the Detroit neighborhood.

Staff Response: The applicant team met several times with the Detroit Community Association over the course of the project review. The project applicant prepared a Traffic study which analyzed and forecasted overall traffic circulation generated from the project. Several traffic calming measures were considered and will be implemented, including traffic signals. Specific measures such as bulb- outs and speed-lumps have been considered and will be further evaluated at a later stage of the project when construction documents for the local streets are submitted to the Public Works Department. The applicant will continue to work with the community as specific phases of the project move forward.

The closest planned City park to the Detroit neighborhood is “Lot P-3,” a proposed two-acre neighborhood park site that can be reached most directly from Ann Arbor Way, Albion Way, and Detroit Boulevard. The other park spaces within the new development are within a ¼-½ mile walk (5- 10 minutes) of the existing neighborhood via a Class 1 off-street trail on the north side of proposed A Street.

Staff has placed an advisory condition on the project to strongly encourage the applicant and any subsequent builders to utilize Consumnes River Boulevard or the future extension of 24 th Street for
construction vehicle access.

CivicThread
Overall, CivicThread commends the applicant team on the improved network as the project moved forward through rounds of review. The letter specifically highlighted the additional Class 1 trails and Class II bike lanes along Future 24
th Street and A Street. One recommendation from CivicThread is regarding the decision to utilize attached sidewalks along F Street from Detroit Boulevard. In response, a trail was designed along the east side of F Street, creating a direct path of travel south to the transit stop.

Policy Considerations
Proposed Land Use Designations
Currently, the project site has General Plan Land use designations Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, Parks and Recreation, Public Quasi-Public, Traditional Neighborhood Low Density, and

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.

Traditional Neighborhood High Density. The existing designations provide for primarily low and medium density housing; higher densities are preferred around the light rail station. The proposed redesignation allows for greater densities near the light rail station, maximizing the project location near public transit while also reaching the density thresholds required as a Transit Priority Project. As proposed, the project would include approximately 66± acres of Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, 30.8± acres of Park and Recreation, 10.6± acres of Public Quasi Public, 26.1± Urban Neighborhood Medium Density, and 7.2± Traditional Center designations.

General Plan Goals and Policies
The Stone Beetland project will assist the City in achieving the vision of the 2035 General Plan. The project site is a large urban infill opportunity located in the South Sacramento Area and will provide new housing and commercial services adjacent to an existing and underutilized light rail station.

The site will accommodate a mix of residential and non-residential uses adjacent to public transit and will achieve land use efficiency through higher density and intensity of development. The project will have a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per net acre with higher densities concentrated around the light rail station.

The project will be well connected to adjacent and existing neighborhoods through a roadway and bicycle network and will establish PUD Guidelines that provide thoughtful design principles to ensure a cohesive and well-structured development. Typical block sizes will encourage pedestrian activity.

Streets will be enhanced by large shade trees and sidewalks that can accommodate high pedestrian traffic. The project also offers a network of open space sites.

Below is a list of Goals and Policies in the 2035 General Plan that support the Stone Beetland Project:

GOAL LU 2.1 City of Neighborhoods. Maintain a city of diverse, distinct, and well-structured neighborhoods that meet the community’s needs for complete, sustainable, and high-quality living environments, from the historic downtown core to well-integrated new growth areas.

Policy LU 2.1.2 Protect Established Neighborhoods. The City shall preserve, protect, and enhance established neighborhoods by providing sensitive transitions between these neighborhoods and adjoining areas, and by requiring new development, both private and public, to respect and respond to those existing physical characteristics buildings, streetscapes, open spaces, and urban form that contribute to the overall character and livability of the neighborhood.

Policy LU 2.1.3 Complete and Well-Structured Neighborhoods. The City shall promote the design of complete and well-structured neighborhoods whose physical layout and land use mix promote walking to services, biking, and transit use; foster community pride; enhance neighborhood identity; ensure public safety; are family-friendly and address the needs of all

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.
ages and abilities.

Policy LU 2.1.6 Neighborhood Centers. The City shall promote the development of strategically located (e.g., accessible to surrounding neighborhoods) mixed-use neighborhood centers that accommodate local-serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses; provide diverse housing opportunities; are within walking distance of surrounding residents; and are efficiently served by transit.

GOAL LU 2.5 City Connected and Accessible. Promote the development of an urban pattern of well- connected, integrated, and accessible neighborhoods corridors, and centers.

Policy LU 2.5.1 Connected Neighborhoods, Corridors, and Centers. The City shall require that new development, both infill and greenfield, maximizes connections and minimizes barriers between neighborhoods corridors, and centers within the city. (RDR) GOAL LU 2.6 City Sustained and Renewed. Promote sustainable development and land use practices in both new development, reuse, and reinvestment that provide for the transformation of Sacramento into a sustainable urban city while preserving choices (e.g., where to live, work, and recreate) for future generations.

Policy LU 2.6.1 Sustainable Development Patterns. The City shall promote compact development patterns, mixed use, and higher-development intensities that use land efficiently; reduce pollution and automobile dependence and the expenditure of energy and other resources; and facilitate walking, bicycling, and transit use.

Policy LU 2.6.2 Transit-Oriented Development. The City shall actively support and facilitate mixed-use retail, employment, and residential development around existing and future transit stations (RDR)
GOAL LU 2.7 City Form and Structure. Require excellence in the design of the city’s form and structure through development standards and clear design direction.

Policy LU 2.7.6 Walkable Blocks. The City shall require new development and reuse and reinvestment projects to create walkable, pedestrian-scaled blocks, publicly accessible mid- block and alley pedestrian routes where appropriate, and sidewalks appropriately scaled for the anticipated pedestrian use.

Policy LU 2.7.7 Buildings that Engage the Street. The City shall require buildings to be oriented to and actively engage and complete the public realm through such features as building orientation, build-to and setback lines, façade articulation, ground-floor transparency, and location of parking.

GOAL ERC 2.1 Integrated Parks and Recreation System. Provide an integrated system of parks, open space areas, and recreational facilities that are safe and connect the diverse communities of Sacramento.

Policy ERC 2.1.1 Complete System. The City shall develop and maintain a complete system

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.
of parks and open space areas throughout Sacramento that provide opportunities for both passive and active recreation.

Policy ERC 2.1.2 Connected Network. The City shall connect all parts of Sacramento through integration of recreation and community facilities with other public spaces and rights-of-way (e.g., buffers, medians, bikeways, sidewalks, trails, bridges, and transit routes) that are easily accessible by alternative modes of transportation.

H-1.4 Facilitate Infill Housing Development. The City shall facilitate infill housing along commercial corridors, near employment centers, near high-frequency transit areas, and in all zones that allow residential development as a way to revitalize commercial corridors, promote walkability and increased transit ridership, and provide increased housing options.

H-4.1 Expand Housing Types Throughout the City. The City shall take meaningful actions to allow for a greater array of housing types throughout the city to create more inclusive and equitable neighborhoods and to affirmatively further fair housing.

H-8.3 Encourage Accessible Housing Near Transit and Amenities. The City shall encourage the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of accessible housing, particularly in neighborhoods that are accessible to public transit, commercial services, and health and community facilities.

Economic Impacts: The Stone Beetland project develops a 140.7-acre site from vacant land to an urban development that offers a range of housing options and commercial, adjacent to public transportation.

Environmental Consideration: The Environmental Services Manager determined that the Project, as proposed, will not have a significant impact to the environment, and pursuant to Public Resources (PRC) section 21155.2(b), a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) was prepared and circulated for public comment. In compliance with PRC 21155.2(b)(2), the City has incorporated mandatory mitigation measures into the project plans to avoid identified impacts or to mitigate such impacts to a point where clearly no significant impacts will occur. These mitigation measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, and address impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. The SCEA was available for public review and comment for a 30-day period from June 23, 2023, through July 24, 2023. As of the writing of this report, no comment letters have been received.

The Environmental Services Manager has determined that adoption of the SCEA and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting are appropriate actions under CEQA. The Initial Study/SCEA and Comments for the Stone Beetland Project (P21-042) are available at the Community Development Department’s webpage located at the following link:
http://portal.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Planning/Environmental/Impact-Reports\ 200-Year Flood Protection: State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810

File ID: 2023-01035 10/10/2023 Public Hearing Item 13.
require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that new development will have protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by SAFCA’s Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project.

Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the local flood management agency, SAFCA, has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will ensure protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. This is based on the SAFCA Urban level of flood protection plan, adequate progress baseline report, and adequate progress toward an urban level of flood protection engineer’s report that were accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-0226 on June 21, 2016, and the SAFCA 2022 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-0313 on October 11, 2022.

Sustainability: The proposed development will ensure energy consumption is minimized and use of renewable energy sources is encouraged in that staff recommends that the project, to the extent possible, incorporates green building methods in the construction of the proposed project. The proposed development is a transit supportive infill site adjacent to a major transit stop. The project will add to the housing diversity of the region, while promoting a walkable, bike-friendly neighborhood.

Commission/Committee Action: On July 27, 2023, the Planning and Design Commission held a public hearing on the project and passed a motion to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council to adopt the ordinance and resolutions approving the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development project.

Financial Consideration: An estimate of the costs and proposed funding sources for all backbone infrastructure improvements, public facilities, and administrative costs to serve the site has been identified.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): No goods or services are being purchased under this report.

Rationale for Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the Stone Beetland project. The project entitlements set the stage for the development of an underutilized vacant 140.7- acre site and its transformation into an urban community that offers a diverse range of housing options and opportunity for commercial uses in a bicycle-, pedestrian-, and transit- supportive environment. The project meets many of the goals and policies of the 2035 General Plan as it relates to infill development, alternate modes of transportation, transit supportive development, housing diversity, and open space/park features.

Figure 1: Vicinity Map

Background

Project Description

The Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (PUD) is a proposal submitted to the City of Sacramento to develop 140.7- vacant acres in South Sacramento. The site is generally located south of the Detroit Boulevard Neighborhood and the City owned “102 acre” site, north of Cosumnes River Boulevard, east of Delta Shores and the future 24th Avenue extension, and west of Sacramento Regional Transit’s Morrison Creek light rail station (See Figure 1).

The proposal would transform 140.7 acres into a Transit Priority Project1 that includes a mix of low, medium, and high-density housing. The land use plan also includes an opportunity to build commercial services on the east side of the development near the three high density residential sites and Consumnes River Boulevard. The total buildout of the PUD area would accommodate a minimum of 1,106 residential units, with approximately two-thirds of the units located within one-half mile of the light rail station.

The proposal includes the construction of 198 affordable dwelling units, representing nearly 20% of the overall unit count in the PUD. Please see additional discussion about the affordable housing below.

Transit Priority Project: Stone Beetland is a Transit Priority Project (TPP), which is a new type of project created by Senate Bill 3752. As a TPP, the project is required to incorporate and comply with the following criteria:

1. At least 50% of the total site must be designated for residential use.

2. Be consistent with the use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies of the regional sustainable community’s strategy.

3. Be located within ½ mile of a transit corridor included in the regional transportation plan (No parcel more than 25% further, and less than 10% of units, no more than 100 units further than 0.5 miles).

4. Achieves a minimum of 20 dwelling units to the net acres.

Consistent with the Transit Priority criteria, the density and intensity of the proposed land uses is highest at the eastern edge adjacent to the transit stop and gradually decreases towards the north and west. The residential lots and street connections adjacent to the existing Detroit neighborhood will provide a transition from the current neighborhood into the new development and provide ample walking and vehicular connections.

Village Sub-Areas: The Stone Beetland PUD has four distinct sub-areas (“Villages”):

West Village, Central Village, North Village, and Transit Village (see Figure 2 below).

1 https://www.sacog.org/post/transit-priority-and-sustainable-communities-projects-consistent-scs 2 Senate Bill (SB) 375 directs the California Air Resources Board to set regional targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Each sub-area consists of different densities and land use assumptions that will be further guided by PUD policies and goals. The West, North and Central Villages are primarily low and medium density residential uses with a range of housing types, such as single-unit dwellings, halfplexes, bungalows, and courtyard development. The densities of the sub-areas are lowest in the West and North Villages, increasing in the Central Village, with the highest density located in the Transit Village. The Transit Village is anticipated to include rental and for-sale units at market rate and regulated affordable units. The PUD will also allow for commercial land uses within the Transit Village.

Requested Entitlements

General Plan Land Use Designation Amendment

The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan Land Use Designations. The General Plan currently designates the subject parcels as Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density (TNMD), Parks and Recreation (Parks), Public Quasi-Public (PQP), Traditional Neighborhood Low Density (TNLD), and Traditional Neighborhood High Density (TNHD).

Figure 2: PUD Villages
The requested General Plan Amendment will reorganize the distribution of land uses to fit the development proposal and introduce General Plan designations that allow for increased density.

A comparison of the changes is provided in Table 1 below.

Table 1: 2035 General Plan Land Use & Urban Form Designation Changes Existing
(Acres)
Proposed
(Acres)
Delta
(Acres)
Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density 81.7 67.6 -14.1 Parks and Recreation 22.5 30.3 +8.2
Public Quasi-Public 9.6 11.6 +2.0
Traditional Neighborhood Low Density 17.9 0 -17.9
Traditional Neighborhood High Density 9.0 0 -9.0
Urban Neighborhood Medium Density 0 23.6 +23.6
Traditional Center 0 7.6 +7.6

The proposed General Plan designations are consistent with the request to develop a Transit Priority Project and planning staff supports the amendments. The request is consistent with General Plan goals and policies related to City Neighborhoods (Goal LU

2.1), City Connected and Accessible (Goal LU 2.5), City Sustained and Renewed (Goal LU 2.6), and City Form and Structure (Goal LU 2.7).

Figure 3: General Plan Amendment Exhibit

Table 2 shows the development potential of each proposed land use designation:

Table 2: 2035 General Plan Land Use & Urban Form Designation Guideline Standards

Building
Height
(stories)
Minimum
Density
(du/na*)
Maximum
Density
(du/na)
Minimum
Floor-
Area-Ratio
Maximum
Floor-
Area-Ratio
Traditional Neighborhood
Medium Density 1-3 8 36 N/A 1.5
Parks and Recreation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Public Quasi-Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Urban Neighborhood
Medium Density 3-8 33 110 1.50 4.0
Traditional Center 1-4 15 36 0.30 2.0
*du/na signifies dwelling units per net acre

The proposed designations allow a variety of uses including single-unit dwellings, high- density residential, mixed-use, and commercial uses. With the proposed amendments, a greater number of residential units can be built compared to the existing designation, further addressing the City’s housing needs, while also efficiently and sustainably developing the land with the highest concentration of dwelling units near transit.

Rezone

The project site is currently zoned Single-Unit Dwelling (R-1), Single-Unit Dwelling or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A), and Agriculture (A). The general purpose of the R-1 and R-1A zones is to accommodate primarily low-density residential uses (attached or detached) and some neighborhood supportive uses such as recreational, religious, and educational facilities. The A zone is primarily dedicated to agriculture and farming.

The applicant is proposing a rezone to higher and more permissible zoning such as the R-1A, Multi-Unit Dwelling (R-2A), Multi-Unit Dwelling (R-4), and Limited Commercial (C- 1). The proposed zoning designations allow for a variety of uses that are envisioned in the proposed general plan designation. Uses allowed in the R-2A, R-4, and C-1 zone include higher density residential development and commercial services that are compatible with residential developments.

Staff supports the rezone because it allows the opportunity for a variety of housing options specifically surrounding the light rail station and commercial compatible with nearby residential. The rezone enables higher densities near the light rail station, addressing specific criteria required for TPP’s. The rezone is also consistent with General Plan goals and policies supporting infill development; providing for a mix of residential types and densities; connecting communities; creating a mix of uses that would promote walking, biking, and transit use; and providing community amenities such as open space.

Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development

The purpose of planned unit developments is to provide guidelines and policies to ensure the development of large areas result in a well-integrated community. These guidelines include design principles, development standards, and land use concepts that will be applied to all future development in the area. The Stone Beetland PUD can be found in Attachment 9.

The Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (PUD) will largely follow the Citywide Design Guidelines, but specific design guidelines are included that are relevant to the project area. They include the following:

1. All homes/residential units are encouraged to front onto residential streets, onto trails and open space, to the extent feasible.

Figure 4: Rezone Exhibit

2. The lots surrounding Lot P3 (in the northeast corner of the community) or in close proximity, shall be generally oriented to front on to the extension of Ann Arbor Way and the landscape amenity to provide “eyes-on-the-park”.

3. Houses adjacent to paseos should consider locating entrances along the pathways to increase natural surveillance.

4. Encourage builders to design some lots to accommodate accessory dwelling units (ADU’s), where feasible.

5. Home designs for the LDR-1 neighborhood shall include at least one single story floor plan.

6. The PUD Guidelines include provisions for perimeter fencing and wayfinding signage to the light rail station.

Medium Density Development: The applicant is relying primarily on the development and design standards in the Planning and Development Code to guide development within the PUD, with just a few proposed modifications to be included in the PUD to tailor the development within the Central Village area.

The underlying zone for the Central Village is R-2A-PUD. The anticipated housing products are compact lots, “I” Court development, and bungalow style condominium lots. While adding to the variety of housing options in the neighborhood, these housing types do not traditionally conform to the regular development standards of the R-2A zone, including lot coverage, lot size, dimensions, and setback requirements of the underlying zone. In order to provide the flexibility to address these innovative housing types, development standards within the Central Village area will vary.

Staff supports the proposed PUD Guidelines as they will ensure the orderly implementation of the development plan.

Figure 5: PUD Schematic Plan

PUD Schematic Plan: The PUD Schematic Plan works in concert with the PUD Guidelines to provide a land use plan consisting of open space, circulation, and development sites to form an integrated master project site consistent with the goals of a Transit Priority Project.

Table 3 summarizes the distribution of housing types between Low, Medium, and High Density. While the entire development is within close walking distance to the light rail station, Stone Beetland takes advantage of its proximity to the station to focus the balance of the project density on the east side of the project.

The Schematic Plan identifies the location of these intensities of residential development. Staff will evaluate future projects against the PUD Guidelines and PUD Schematic Land Use Plan. Staff has determined the PUD Schematic Plan is consistent with the proposed amended General Plan, zoning designations, and PUD Guidelines for the project site.

Table 3: PUD Land Use Assumptions
Land Use
Designation
Zoning Proposed (ac) Anticipated
DU
Anticipated
Net
Density
Gross Net
Low Density Residential R-1A-PUD 30.2 21.3 190 8.9
Medium Density Residential R-2A-PUD 25 17.5 262 15
High Density Residential R-4-PUD 17.9 16.5 711 43.1

Figure 6: PUD Site Plan

Park and Open Space Network: The project includes a park and open space network with a mix of public and semi-public spaces comprised of 33 acres. The parks and open spaces will satisfy the development’s Quimby parkland dedication obligation of approximately 9.5 acres. Three new public parks will be dedicated to the City and master planned with the input of the new residents. The parks are located within a 10- minute walk from the Villages and can be easily accessed from the adjacent existing community. The project includes approximately 1.5 miles of Class 1 bike paths, with connections to the existing and planned land uses to the north, and the planned development in Delta Shores.

Staff and the applicant submitted the proposed project to the Parks and Community Enrichment Commission on June 1st for review and comment. The Commission discussed park accessibility, limiting garages to support transit, infrastructure needs for parks, specifically adding restrooms to parks, and capitalizing on the project’s location proximate to Morrison Creek and creating a “bio-corridor”. Further discussion was related to park and detention basin maintenance.

Figure 7: Mobility Framework
Traffic and Transit

Vehicle Circulation: Stone Beetland will connect to Detroit Neighborhood via Detroit Boulevard, Albion Way and Ann Arbor Way. Stone Beetland will also extend 24th Street.

A description of some of these improvements are provided below:
24th Street is an existing 2-lane road (north of Kenworthy Way) providing north-south access from the Meadowview Neighborhood to Sutterville Rd. This street will be extended approximately 1,000 feet to provide access to Delta Shores from the Stone Beetland Project. The extension is proposed to be a 4-lane road. Future northern 24th Street extension of approximately 2,400 feet connecting Stone Beetland to the Meadowview community will occur upon development of adjacent parcels.

Detroit Boulevard and Ann Arbor Way will be extended via F Street and H Street. These extensions will provide north-south access to the Detroit Neighborhood and the Morrison Creek light rail station. The extensions are proposed to be local collector streets.

Bicycle Master Plan Amendment

Active Transportation Network: On-site pedestrian and bicycle access is proposed to be provided via a number of on and off-street trails that work in conjunction with the planned parks to provide pedestrian and bicycle access through the Stone Beetland PUD and adjacent neighborhoods. The applicant has provided a trails plan as part of Figure 8: Master Tentative Parcel Map
the PUD that depicts features such as off-street multi-use trails, on street bike lanes, and widened sidewalks near the light rail station.

The subdivision of the project area will create a new multi-modal network to support future development. The new road network includes the extension of 24th Street and Detroit Boulevard (‘F’ Street) through the site and connecting with Cosumnes River Boulevard.

Further mobility improvements include a 10’ widened sidewalk (depicted on Figure 7 in Orange) that will bisect the project, running east/west from 24th Street and connecting with Morrison Creek Light Rail Station. This sidewalk will be maintained by the Homeowners Association and will serve primarily walking trips by residents to and from the light rail station.

The 2016 City Bicycle Master Plan (Plan) was developed to serve the recreational and transportation needs of the public. This Plan was adopted by the City of Sacramento in 1995 and has since undergone several updates and revisions. Currently the Bicycle Master Plan terminates at the southern end of Detroit Boulevard. The proposed project amends the plan and provides new connections (see Figure 4, “Bike Lane-Class 2”), to the light rail station, Cosumnes River Boulevard, the surrounding Delta Shores development, and beyond to the larger City trail network. As shown in Figures 7 and 9, the Stone Beetland project is proposing a Class II trail around the Western and Central Village and a Class I along perimeter of the site.

Figure 9: Bike Facilities Plan
The requested amendments to the City’s Bikeway Master Plan include the following:

1. A 16-foot-wide shared-use path (Class 1, shown in Red), which will run along the project’s west boundary along the east side of 24th Street (Street A, F, E and H), with adjacent landscaping to buffer the shared-use from the street.

2. A 16-foot-wide shared-use path (Class 1, shown in Red), which will run along the north side of the project boundary, between the Stone Beetland Development and the vacant property to the north (owned by the City of Sacramento, connecting the development to 24th Street and the Delta Shores development to the west. This Class 1 shared-use path will connect to the existing Detroit/Southgate neighborhood at both Burlington Way and Detroit Boulevard. It connects to the Morrison Creek light rail station and out to Cosumnes River Boulevard.

3. A series of Class 2 bike lanes (shown in Blue) will be located on the primary street within and surrounding the project site. (24th Street, A Street, and C Street).

The proposed amendments were presented to the Active Transportation Commission on June 15, 2023. The Commission expressed their pleasure with the bicycle facilities connectivity to the north, south, and west, along with praise for the central east/west widened 10-foot sidewalk, which would not restrict bicycle usage.

Displeasure was shared with staff and the Applicant regarding the community street widths, as the Commission believed it would encourage higher speeds, presenting safety risks for bicyclists. Staff informed the Commission that the streets meet city standards and will serve not only local Stone Beetland resident traffic but provide circulation to and from adjoining neighborhoods. The Commission also expressed their wish for a direct north/south bicycle lane to the light rail station. The hearing item concluded with the Commission reiterating their overall support for the Amendment and voting unanimously for a recommendation of adoption of the Amendment by City Council.

Tentative Subdivision Map

The Tentative Subdivision Map will subdivide the 140.7 acres into 402 lots for residential development and more than lots for landscaping, paseos, trails, open space, commercial mixed use, and high density residential.

The applicant is requesting deviations to established street standards by proposing to eliminate the northern parking lane and sidewalk on Street A, 42’ right-of-way without landscape parkways on H Street and Albion Way, modified intersection spacing in MDR-1, residential street right-of-way without landscape parkways on LDR-2 and LDR- 3, exceeding maximum cul-de-sac length within LDR-2, and modified intersection angle for D and E Street.

The Department of Public Works has reviewed and accepted the tentative map design deviations given the low traffic volumes, limited access around the curve, and the geometry constraints of the framework roadway intersections. The final design elements, signage, and striping will be designed for the review and approval of the Department of Public Works.

The Subdivision Review Committee reviewed and approved the Master Tentative Parcel Map and the Tentative Subdivision Map and conditions of approval on June 7, 2023.

The Master Tentative Parcel Map and the Tentative Subdivision Map and justification for the deviation to tentative map standards can be found in Attachments 14 and 15.

A summary of the number of lots within each land use designations is provided in the table below:

Table 4: Residential Land Use Mix
Zoning Zoning
Max
Density
PUD Land
Use
Designation
Gross
Acres
Net
Acres
Anticipated % of
D.U.’s DU Net
Density
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-1 17.6 11.9 1001 8.4
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-2 7.5 5.7 54 9.5
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-3 5.1 3.7 36 9.7
LDR SUBTOTAL 30.2 21.3 190 8.9 16.4%
R2-A(PUD) 17 MDR-1 15.1 10.0 152 15.2
R2-A(PUD) 17 MDR-2 9.9 7.5 110 14.8
MDR SUBTOTAL 25.0 17.5 262 15.0 22.5%
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-1 5.4 5.4 241 44.6
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-2 5.3 4.6 198 44.0
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-3 7.2 6.5 272 41.2
HDR SUBTOTAL 17.9 16.5 711 43.1 61.1%
RESIDENTIAL TOTAL 73.1 55.3 1,163 21.0 100.0%
Table Footnotes:

1. LDR-1 is capped at 100 maximum primary dwelling units.

2. In order to achieve the minimum density of 20.0 units per net acre per the TPP policy, the total of LDR, MDR and HDR must achieve 1,106 units, as a minimum .

Affordable Housing

The Stone Beetland project contains a condition of approval to require the construction of affordable housing onsite. The City of Sacramento’s Mixed Income Housing Ordinance (MIHO) (City Code Section 17.712) is intended to require residential projects to contribute to the construction of affordable housing and to implement the policies of the City’s Housing Element. Section 17.712.030 requires residential projects that exceed 100 gross acres in size (like Stone Beetland) to pay housing impact fees on all new construction and also adopt a Mixed Income Housing Strategy. There are several categories under which a project may be exempt from the MIHO requirements, including the following exemption:

Development projects in which at least 10% of the dwelling units are affordable dwelling units. The affordable dwelling units shall have a regulatory agreement recorded on title, requiring the units to remain affordable for a period of no less than 30 years. The agreement shall be monitored by SHRA and the owners shall be subject to a monitoring fee as established by the guidelines authorized by section 17.712.090.

In the case of Stone Beetland, the applicant is proposing to go beyond the minimum 10% onsite affordable housing obligation that would earn an exemption from the ordinance and instead provide approximately 20% of the onsite units as affordable; the project would build 198 regulated affordable units within the Transit Area.

The condition of approval specifies that a Regulatory Agreement be worked out with Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) staff and be recorded against the property’s title prior to the recordation of the first final map. At that time, the location of the affordable units will be determined, along with the type of units (to be compatible with the market-rate units in appearance, materials, and finished quality), and the size of the units (a mix of bedrooms to accommodate households of different sizes).

Staff supports the inclusion of onsite affordable units within the Stone Beetland project directly adjacent to a functioning light rail transit station, near parks and schools, and ample commercial services within the surrounding community.

Water Supply Assessment Report

According to Senate Bill 610, a water supply assessment is required for proposed residential developments with more than 500 units and office developments of more than 250,000 square feet. In addition, SB 221 requires written verification of sufficient water supply before a project is approved. The attached Water Supply Assessment Form verifies the City of Sacramento has sufficient water allocations available to serve the proposed project as well as the projected future growth.

Tree Removal Permit

Pursuant to Sacramento City Code (SCC) 12.56, the removal of private protected trees requires a tree removal permit. This project proposes to remove six private protected trees, including the following: one (1) – 30-inch black willow, one (1) – 55-inch black willow, three (3) – 12-inch interior live oaks, one (1) - 27-inch California walnut, and one (1) - 19-inch valley oak. These trees are identified as tree numbers 1, 592, 594, 595, 597, and 599 (respectively) in the Arborist Report and related exhibits. The trees are proposed for removal because they conflict with the location of necessary infrastructure, including the construction of drainage facilities and a proposed park.

The applicant will plant the equivalent of at least 167 inches Diameter Standard Height in the form of new 35-foot diameter large canopy street trees and landscape trees, to the satisfaction of the City Urban Forester.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

October 10, 2023

ADOPTING THE SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE STONE BEETLAND (P21-042)

BACKGROUND

A. On July 27, 2023 the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on, and forwarded a recommendation of approval of the Stone Beetland (P21-042) Project to City Council.

B. On October 10, 2023 the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant Sacramento City Code, and received and considered evidence concerning the Stone Beetland (P21-042) Project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds as follows:

A. Pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21155, the Project is a Transit Priority Project (TPP) that:
1) contains at least 50 percent residential use because the project includes a total of 9 5 percent of the total proposed building square footage is for residential land uses (1,163 dwelling units) and the remaining 5 percent of building square footage is for commercial use;
(2) provides a minimum net density of at least 20 dwelling units per acre because the project includes net density of 2 1 dwelling units per acre (1,163 total units / 55.3 net acres); and (3) is located within one -half mile of a major tr ansit stop or high quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan because the project density and intensity of the land uses is highest at the eastern edge of the project site, adjac ent to the Morrison Creek SacRT light rail station, a nd gradually decreases towards the north and west. A project shall be considered to be within one- half mile of a major transit stop if all parcels within the project have no more than 25 percent of

their area farther than one -half mile from the stop and i f not more than 10 percent of the residential units or 100 units, whichever is less, in the project are farther than one-half mile from the stop.

Consistent with this criterion, 22.7 percent of the parcels within the project is located beyond one - half mil e of the Morrison Creek SacRT light rail station. The project also meets the second prong of the criterion by ensuring no more than 100 dwelling units are located beyond one-half mile from the light rail station. This is acc omplished by capping the number of units within the West Village, which is beyond the

0.5-mile distance from the transit stop.

B: The Project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in the Sacram ento Area Council of Government’s (SACOG) Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS), for which the State Air Resources Board, pursuant to subparagraph (H) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 65080 of the Government Code, has accepted SACOG’s determination that the sustainable communities strategy would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. SACOG’s MTP/SCS identifies the project site as being located largely within the Blue Line Statio n Area – Meadowview to CRC Center and Corridor Community designation of the MTP/SCS. Within the Center/Corridor Community, the MTP/SCS forecasts a range of low to high density residential, commercial, office, and industrial uses. The proposed project’s land uses fall within this range of general uses, densities, and building intensities.

Development at the proposed densities is consistent with the buildout assumptions for the area within this community type of the MTP/SCS.

C: Pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2 , the Project has incorporated all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)/SCS EIR.

D: An initial study has be en prepared that identifies all significant or potentially significant impacts of the transit priority project, other than those that do not need to be reviewed pursuant to PRC Section 21159.28 based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record.

The initial study identifies cumulative effects that have been adequately addressed and mitigated in the prior applicable certified EIRs. Cumulative effects have been found to be adequately addressed and mitigated in the prior applicable certified EIRs and

are not considered cumulatively considerable for the purposes of this SCEA.

E: The Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) includes measures that either avoid or mitigate to a level of insignificance all potentially significant or significa nt effects of the project required to be identified in the initial study.

F: The draft SCEA was completed, noticed and circulated in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines:

I). On June 23, 2023 a Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent to Adopt the SCEA (NOI) dated June 20, 2023 was
posted with the Sacramento County Clerk -Recorder’s
Office;
II) On June 23, 2023 a Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent to Adopt the SCEA (NOI) dated J une 20, 2023 was
circulated for public comments for 30 days. The NOI was sent to those public agencies that have jurisdiction by law with respect to the proposed project and to other
interested parties and agencies, including property
owners and occupants within 500 feet of the boundaries
of the proposed project. The comments of such persons
and agencies were sought.

III). On June 23, 2023 a Notice of the SCEA was published in the Sacramento Bulletin, a newspaper of general
circulation, and the NOI was posted in the office of the Sacramento County Clerk.

IV). On June 23, 2023 a Notice of Availability/Notice of Intent to Adopt the SCEA (NOI) dated June 20, 2023 along with
the SCEA were uploaded and posted to the California
Office of Planning and Research , State Clearinghouse
(SCH) (CEQAnet.opr.ca.gov) (SCH#: 2023060633).

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the SCEA, including the initial study, the conditions incorporated into the Project, and the comments received during the public review process and the hearing on the Project. The City Council has determined that the SCEA constitutes an adequate, accurate, objective and complete review of the environmental effects of the proposed project.

Section 3. Based on its review of the SCEA and on the basis of the whole record, the City Council finds that the SCEA reflects the City Council’s independent

judgment and analysis and that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 4. The City Council adopts the SCEA for the Project.

Section 5. Pursuant to CEQA section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15074, and in support of its approval of the Project, the City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to require all reasonably feasible mitigation measures, including mitigation measures from the Master EIR as appropriate, be implemented by means of Project conditions, agreements, or other measures, as set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Section 6. Upon approval of the Project, the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a Notice of Determination with the Sacramento County Clerk and with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to section 21152(a) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15075 of the State EIR Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.

Section 7. Pursuant to Guidelines s ection 15091(e) , the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 915 I Street, Sacramento, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City Council.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Stone Beetland Project 1
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023
Stone Beetland Project (P21-042)
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

July 2023

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines require Lead Agencies to adopt a program for monitoring the mitigation measures required to avoid the significant environmental impacts of a project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) ensures that mitigation measures imposed by the City are completed at the appropriate time in the development process.

The mitigation measures identified in the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the Stone Beetland Project include applicable measures from the prior applicable environmental impact report ( the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy [MTP/SCS] Environmental Impact Report [EIR]), as well as project -specific mitigation measures. In addition to listing all identified mitigation measures, the MMRP also provides the party responsible for monitoring implementation of the mitigation measure, the mi lestones fo r implementation and monitoring, and a sign -off that the m itigation measure has been implemented. Applicable mitigation measures from the 2020 MTP/SCS EIR that have been incorporated into the Stone Beetland Susta inable Communities Environmental Assessment Initial Study , consistent with Public Resources Code Section
21155.2, are distinguishable by the preceding letters “MTP/SCS”.

Stone Beetland Project 2
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
I. AIR QUALITY

MTP/SCS
MM AIR-3:

Implementing agencies shall require assessment of new and existing odor sources for individual land use projects to determine whether sensitive rece ptors would be ex posed to objectionable odors and apply recommended applicable mit igation measures as defined by the applicable local air district and best practices.

Implementing agencies shall require assessment of new and existing odor sources for indiv idual nonagricult ural land use projects to determine whether sensitive receptors would be exposed to objec tionable odors and apply recommended
applicable mitigation measures as defined by the applicable local air district and best practices.

Examples of m itigation measures that may be applied where feasible and necessary to address s ite-specific impacts, inc lude but are not limited to:
• Proposed industrial, commercial, or convenience land
uses (e.g., fast -food restaurants, painting operations) that have the potential to emi t o bjectionable odors shall be located as far away as feasibly possibl e from existing and proposed sensitive receptors and oriented where possible to place buildings or other obstructions between the odor source and downwind receptors.
• The odor -producing potential of land use s shall be
considered when the type of facility t hat would occupy industrial, commercial, or convenience areas is
considered.
• If an odor -emitting facility is to occupy space in the industrial, commercial, or convenience area, the odor - producing potential of the source and potential control devices shall be determined in coordination with the local air district and shall be based on the number of complaints associated with existing sources of the same nature.

Odor-control devices (e.g., wet chemical scrubbers, HVAC City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the approval of
project improvement
plans

Stone Beetland Project 3
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
filters, activated carbon scrubbers, bio logically active filters, enclosures) shall be identified in the improvement plans before the approval of building permits. The odor - control devices shall be installed before the issuanc e of certificates of occupancy for the potentially odor -producing use.
• Require notification to incoming property owners (e.g., real estate disclosures) regarding the existence of pre- existing odor-emitting facilities or operations (e.g.,
similar to
avigation easements for noise).

AIR-1: The following requirements shall be noted on project improvement plans, s ubject to review and approval by the City of Sacramento Community Development Department:

• Control of fugitive dust is required by District Rule 403 and enforced by District staff.
• Water all exposed surfaces two times daily. Ex posed
surfaces include, but are not lim ited to soil piles, graded areas, unpaved parking areas, staging areas, and access roads.
• Cover or maintain at least two feet of free board space on haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material on the site. Any haul trucks that would be traveling along freeways or major roadways should be covered.
• Use wet power vacuum street sweepers to remove any
visible trackout mud or dirt onto adjacent public roads at least once a day. Use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. • Limit vehicle spee ds on unpa ved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph).
• All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, parking lots to be paved should be completed as soon as possible. In
addition, building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless se eding or soil binders are used.

Minimize idling time either by shu tting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes
City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
project improvement
plans

Stone Beetland Project 4
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
[California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections
2449(d)(3) and 2485]. Provide clear signage that p osts this requirement for workers at the entrances to the site. • Provide current certificate(s) of compliance for CARB’s In- Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation [California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449 and 2449.1].

For more informati on contact CARB at 877- 593-6677,
[email protected], or
www.arb.ca.gov/doors/compliancecert1. html.
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and
determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

AIR-2: The following requirement shall be noted on project improvement plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Sacramento Community Development Department:

• Zero VOC emitting paints shall be used for all architectural coatings associated with the propose d projec t, including for resid ential an d non- residential interior and ext erior areas, and the on-site parking areas.

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the approval of
project improvement
plans

AIR-3: Prior to issuance of the f irst cer tificate of occupancy, the proj ect applicant shall pay a mitigation fee based on the equivalent amount of the project’s contribution of ROG emissions that exceeds the applicable threshold of significance (i.e., 1.84 lbs/day for the proposed project) and th e per ton cost -effectiveness identified by the CARB’s most current Carl Moyer Program Guidance. The project applicant may propose payment towards an alternate off-site mitigation project within the same region through participation in an off-site mitigation program, coordinated through SMAQMD. The off- site mitigation pr oject must result in an equivalent emission reduction as identified above and be subject to verification and approval by SMAQMD. The final details of the mit igation fee shall be determined in coordination with, and reviewed and approved by, City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department

SMAQMD
Prior to the issuance
of the first certificate of
occupancy

Stone Beetland Project 5
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
the SMAQMD and City of Sacramento Community Development Department. Proof of payment shall be submitted to the City of Sacramento Community Development Department.

II. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

MTP/SCS
MM BIO-1b:

Identify Special -Status Plant Species, and Avoid, Minimize, and Mitigate Impacts

If the qualified biologist, after implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1a, deter mines that suitable habitat f or s pecial- status plants i s present within the area of impact and could be adversely affected by construction activities, then the following measures shall be implemented:

• Eleven special -status plant species are covered under adopted HCPs or NCCPs within the plan area of the
proposed MTP/SCS (Yolo HCP/NCCP, South Sacr amento
HCP, and Natomas Basin HCP; Appendix BIO -1). If a
project under the pro posed MTP/SCS is within the plan
area of an adopted HCP or NCCP, and the project
qualifies as a covered activity MTP/SCS 2020 Sacramento Area Council of Governments Draft Environmental Impact
Report Biological Resources – Page 6–46 under the HCP
or NCCP, t hen the implementing agency may seek
coverage under the plan. If permitting through an adopted HCP or NCCP is pursued, the implementing agency would
be required to meet the permi t conditions and other
requirements established in the plan’s Implementing
Agreement, which often includes (depending on the plan) submitting a complete applicati on package, paying
required f ees, fulfilling any approp riate survey
requirements, and complyin g with all applicable
conservation measures.
• For projects that are not within the plan area of an adopted HCP or NCCP or if special -status plant species City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department

Prior to project
initiation and during
the blooming period
for special-status plant
species with potential
to occur in the area of
impact.

Stone Beetland Project 6
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
that are not covered under an adopted HCP or NCCP may
be present within the area of impact, the follow ing
measures shall apply:
• Prior to project initiation and during the blooming period for special -status plant species with potential to occur in the area of impact, a qualified botanist shal l con duct protocol-level s urveys for special -status plants in
accordance with Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating
Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and
Natural Communities (CDFW 2018c).
• If no special -status plants are found during the proto col- level survey, the botanist will document the findings in a letter report to USFWS, CDFW, and the implementing
agency and no further mitigation will be required.
• If special -status plant species are found that cannot be avoided during construction, the implementing agency w ill consult with CDFW or USFWS to deter mine the
appropriate mitigation measures for direct and indirect impacts that could occur as a result of project
construction. The implementing agency will implement the agreed-upon mitigation measures to achieve no n et loss of occupied habitat or individu als. Mitigation Measures may include preserving and enhancing existing
populations, creation of offsite populations on project mitigation sites through seed collection or transplantation, and/or r estoring or creating suitable habitat in s ufficient quantiti
es to achieve no net loss of occupied habitat
and/or individuals.

MTP/SCS
MM BIO-1c:

Identify Special-Status Wildlife, and Avoid, Minimize, and Mitig ate Impacts.

If the qualified biologist, after implementation of Mitigation Measure BI O-1a, de termines that suitable habitat for special - status wildlife is present within t he area of impac t and could be adversely affected by construction activities, then the following City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Preconstruction
surveys and
avoidance and
minimization
measures are
required. Alternatively,
if suitable habitat is

Stone Beetland Project 7
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
measures shall be implemented:

• Thirty special -status wildlife species are cover ed under adopted HCPs or NCCPs within the plan area of the
proposed MTP/SCS (Yolo HCP/NCCP, South Sacramento
HCP, and N atomas Basi n HCP; Appendix BIO -1). If a
project under the proposed MTP/SCS is within the plan
area of an adopted HCP or NCCP, and the project
qualifies as a covered activity under the HCP or NCCP,
then the implement ing agency may seek coverage under
the plan. If perm itting through an adopted HCP or NCCP is pursued, the implementing agency would be required to meet the permit conditions and other requirements
established in the plan’s Implementing Agreement, which often includes (depending on the plan) submi tting a
complete application package, pay ing required fees,
fulfilling any appropriate survey requirements, and
complying with all applicable conservation measures.
• For projects that are not within the plan area of an adopted HCP or NCCP [as is the case f or the proposed
project] or if special -status wildlife species that are not covered under an adopted HCP or NCCP may be present
(where ap plicable), preconstruction surveys, and
avoidance and minimization measures ar e required.

Alternatively, if suitable habitat is determined to be present within t he area of impact, presence of special -status species may be assumed instead of confirmed with
surveys. Consultation with CDFW, USFWS, and/or NOAA
Fisheries may also be required, depending on the type of impact and the species involved. Refer to the Avoidance and Minimization Measures for each special -status wildlife species with potential to occur w ithin the plan area of the proposed MTP/SCS below. [All avoidance and
minimization measures are included in the MTP/SCS EIR
on pages 6-47 through 6-64].
determined to be
present within the area
of impact, presence of
special-status species
may be assumed
instead of confirmed
with surveys.

Stone Beetland Project 8
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
• Consultation with CDFW or USFWS may include acquiring a CDFW Incidental Take Permit or a take exemption
through Section 7, or an Incidental Take Permit through Section 10. Conditio ns of incidental take authorization may include minimization measures to reduce impacts on
individual species, compensation for loss of the species including but not limited to pr eservation, restoration, or creation of special -status wildlife habitat. Inci dental take authorization is not available for species with potential to occur within the plan area of the proposed MTP/SCS that are fully protected under California Fish and Game Code (American peregrine falcon, bald eagle, California black rail, golden eagle, greater sandhill crane, white- tailed kite, California wolverine, salt marsh h arvest mouse, and
ringtail).
• If habitat compensation is required, mitigation will occur at an agency approved mitigation bank or through individual mitigation locations as approved by USFWS and/or
CDFW. Examples of representative minimum replacement
ratios are presented below in Table 6- 10. A mitigation and monitoring plan will be developed describi ng how
unavoidable losses of special status wildlife will be
compensated. The mitigation and monitoring plan will
include how the site will be monitored and the duration of monitoring until the mitigation is considered to be
successful. The implementing agency shall comply with all requirements of these Incidental Take Permits.
• Should Section 7 consultation be required, c onsideration of critical habitat within t he area of impact would also be required. Designated critical habitat within the vicinity of the area of impact will be identified. All proposed project actions will be desi gned to avoid direct and indirect
adverse modifications to these areas. Minimization
measures, such as establishing and maintaining buffers
around areas of designated critical hab itat will be
Stone Beetland Project 9
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
implemented in the event that avoidance is not feasible. If critical habitat may be adversely modified by the
implementation of the proposed MTP/SC S, the area to be modified will be evaluated by a qualified biologist to
determine the potential magnitude of the project effects (e.g., description of primary constituent elements present and quantification of thos e affected) at a level of detail necessary to satisfy applicable environmental compliance and permitting requirements.

MTP/SCS
MM BIO-3:

Avoid, Minimize, and Mitigate Impacts on Sensitive Natural Communities.

If the qualified biologist, after implemen tation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2, determines that riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are present within the area of impact and could be adversely affected by construction activities, th en t he following measures shall be implemented:
• To the extent practicable , and in consideration of other design requirements and constraints (e.g., meeting
primary project objecti ves and needs, avoidance of other sensitive resources), t he implementing agency shall
attempt to design the proposed projects in a way that
minimizes the removal of native sensitive natural
communities, particularly tr ees that contribute to the overstory canopy of these communities.
• If adverse effects on ripari an habitat or other sensitive natural communities associated with the bed, bank , or
channel of streams or lakes cannot be avoided, the
implementing agency shall comply with Section 1602 of
the Califo rnia Fish and Game Code by su bmitting a
Streambed Alterat ion Notification to C DFW, pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game
Code. If the resources are determined to be subject to
CDFW jurisdiction, the implementing agency shall abid e by the conditions of any ex ecuted agreement prior to an y City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to initiation of
any ground disturbing
activities

Stone Beetland Project 10
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
initiation of construction activities.
• The implementing agency shall compensate for
permanent loss of riparian habitat at a sufficient ratio for no n et loss of habitat function or acreage for rest oration and preservation, which may be achieved through a
combination of onsit e restoration/creation, offsite
restoration, preservation, or mitigation credits. If mitigation credits are not available, stream and ripari
an habitat
compensation shall include establishment of riparian
vegetation on currently unveget ated bank portions of
streams affected by the project and enhancement of
existing riparian habitat through removal of nonnative
species, where appropriate, and p lanting additional native riparian plants to increase cover, continuity, and width of the existing riparian corridor along streams in the site and surrounding areas. Construction activities and
compensatory mitigation shall be conducted in
accordance with the terms of a streambed alteration
agreement a s required under Section 1602 of the
California Fish and Game Code, a nd shall include
development of a Compensatory Stream and Riparian
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan for creating or restoring in- kind habitat in the surrounding area.
• The Compensatory Stre am and Riparian Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan shall include the following:

o identification of compensatory mitigation sites and
criteria for selecting these mitigation sites;
o in-kind reference habitats for c omparison with
compensatory riparian habitats ( using performance
and success criteria) to document success;
o monitoring pro tocol, including schedule and annual
report requirements (compensatory habitat shall be
monitored for a minimum of 5 years from completion
of mitigation, or human intervent ion [incl uding
Stone Beetland Project 11
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
recontouring and grading], or until the su ccess criteria identified i n the approved mitigation plan have been
met, whichever is longer);
o ecological performance standards, based on the best
available sci ence and including specifications for
native ri parian plant densities, species composition,
amount of dead woody vegetati on gaps and bare
ground, and survivorship; at a minimum,
compensatory mitigation planting sites must achieve
80 percent survival of pla nted riparian trees and
shrubs by the end of the 5 -year maintenance and
monitoring period or dead and dying trees shall b e
replaced and monitoring continued until 80 percent
survivorship is achieved;
o corrective measures if performance standards are not
met;
o responsible parties for monitoring and prep aring
reports; and
o responsible parties for receiving and reviewing reports and for verifying success or prescribing
implementation or corrective actions.

• If oak woodland habitat is removed, the county
implementing agency shall determine if the loss of oak
woodland would have a significant impact on t he
environment. If so, an oak woodland mitigation plan would be developed that achieves a no- net-loss of habi tat
acreage and function, which may be achieved through a
combination of restoration/creat ion, pres
ervation, or
mitigation credits. At a minimum, t he restoration and
monitoring plan shall include clear goals and objectives, success criteria, specifics on r estoration/creation (e.g., plant palette, soils, irr igation), specific monitoring periods and repor ting guidelines, and a maintenance plan. Oak
woodland restoration or creation shall be monitored for a Stone Beetland Project 12
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
minimum of five years and shall be considered successf ul when at least 75 percent of all plantings have become
successfully established. Such mi tigation sites shall be dedicated either in fee or as an easement in perpetuit y held by a qualified agency. Guaranteed funding for
maintenance of the mitigation sites shall be established. • If losses of other sensitive natural communities recognized as sensitive by CDFW (see Appendix BIO -2) would be
substantial, then additional comp ensation shall be
provided through creating, restoring, or preserving in
perpetuity in- kind communities to achieve nonet -loss of habitat function or acreage.

MTP/SCS
MM BIO-5:

Avoid, Minimize, and Mitigate Impacts on Wetland and Other Waters

If the qualified biologist, after implement ation of Mitigation Measure BIO -4, determines that wetlands or other wa ters are present within the area of impact and could be a dversely affected by construction activities, then the following measures shall be implemented:

• The implementing agency shall conduct a delineation of state or federally protected wetlands and subm it the
delineation to USACE for verification. The delineation shall be conducted according to methods established in the
USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental
Laboratory 1987 ), the Arid West Supplement
(Environmental Laboratory 2008), and state wetland
procedures (California Wat er Boa rds 2019 or curre nt
procedures).
• The implementing agencies shall obtain a USACE Section 404 permit, RWQCB Section 401 certification, and a
Streambed Alteration Agreement (1602) f rom CDFW if
required, and the implementing agency shall implement all permit conditions. The acreage, location, and methods for City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to initiation of
any ground disturbing
activities

Stone Beetland Project 13
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
compensation shall be determined during the Section 404, RWQCB, and Streambed Alternation Agree ment (1602)
permitting process.
• Wetland habitat shall be restored, enh anced, and/or
replaced at an acreage and location and by methods
agreeable to USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW as
appropriate, depending on agency jurisdiction. The
replacement of waters or wetlands shall be equivalent to the nature of the habitat lost and shall be provided at a suitable ratio to ensure t hat, at a mini mum, there is no net loss of habitat acreage or value. The replacement habitat shall be set aside in perpetuity for habitat use.

III. CULTURAL RESOURCES

MTP/SCS
MM CR-2:

Conduct project -specific archaeological resource studies and identify and implement project-specific mitigation.

Measures that shall be implemented, wher e feasible and necessary to ad dress si te-specific impacts, include, but are not limited to, the following:

• As part of the appropriate project/environmental review of individual projects, the NAHC shall be c onsulted to
determine whether known sacred sites ar e in the project area, and to identify Native Americans to contact to obtain information about the project area and relevant areas of cultural sensitivity. Additional consultation with relevant tribal representatives may be appropriate regarding known prehistoric sites, traditional c ultural places, TCPs, project areas deemed highly sensitive for prehistoric or
ethnohistoric resources, or where avoidance of impacts to prehistoric or ethnohistoric resources may be infeasible. • A records search at the appropri ate Information Center of the CHRIS shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist (36 CFR Section 61) as part of the appropriate
project/environmental review of individual projects to
City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department

If archeological
resources are
discovered during
construction

Stone Beetland Project 14
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
determine whether t he project area has been previously surveyed and wh ether archaeological resourc es were
identified.
• In the event the records indicate that no previous survey has been conducted or the survey did not meet current
professional standards or regulatory guideli nes, the
qualified archaeologist (36 CFR Section 61) or the
Information Center sh all ma ke a recommendation on
whether a survey is warranted based on the sensitivity of the project area for archaeological resources and current professional standards or regulatory guidelines.
• If a survey is considered war ranted, the archaeological study of the project area by a qualified archaeologist shall include conducting a field survey, necessary background research, a Sacred Lands search by the NAHC and
consultation with local Native Americans identified by the NAHC, consultation with local histori cal so cieties,
museums or other interested parties as relevant, and an Archaeological Survey Report. The confidential report
shall document the results of the survey and the c ultural context, assess the federal, state, or loca l significance of prehistoric, traditional, or historic -era archaeological resources that may potentially be directly or indirectly impacted by project activities, provide appropriate
management recommenda tions, and include recordation
of identified archae ological resources on appropri ate California DPR series 523 forms. Management
recommendations may include but not be limited to
additional studies to evaluate identified sites, treatment for documented his torical resources, or archaeological
monitoring during ground-disturbing construction activities at locations determined by the archaeologist to be
sensitive for subsurface cultural resource deposits,
including local Native American monitors if sensitive f or prehistoric resources. The final confidential report and Stone Beetland Project 15
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
DPR forms would be filed by the archaeologist with the CHRIS. Recommended treatment for historical resources
identified in the report should be implemented.
• If no archeological resources are ident ified in the
Archeological Survey Report that may be directly or
indirectly im pacted b y project activities, mitigation is complete as there would be no adverse change to
documented archeological resources.
• When a project would impact a known archaeologic al site, the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall
determine whether the site is a historical resource (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(1)). If archaeological
resources identified in the project area are considered potentially significant, the project sponsor and/or
responsible implementing agency shall undertake
additional stu dies overseen by a qualified archaeologist (36 CFR Section 61) to evaluate the resources eligibility for listing in the CRHR, NRHP, or local register and to recommend further mitigative treatment. Evaluations shall be based on, but not limited to, surface remains,
subsurface testing, or archival and ethnographic
resources, on the framework of the historic context and important research questions of the project area, and on the integrity of the resource. If a site to be tested is prehistoric, local t ribal representatives should be afforded the opportunity to monitor the ground- disturbing activities.

Appropriate mitigation may include curation of artifacts removed during subsurface testing.
• If significant archaeological r esources that meet the definition of h istorical or unique archaeological resources are identified in the project area, the preferred mitigation of impacts is preservation in place (CEQA Guidelines
Section 151 26.4(b); PRC Section 21083.2). Preservation in p lace may be accomplished by, b ut is no t limited to, avoidance by project design, incorporation within parks, Stone Beetland Project 16
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
open space or conservation easements, covering with a
layer of sterile soil, or similar measures. If preservation in place is feasible, mitigation is complete. Additionally, where the i mplementing agency determines that an
alternative mitigation method is superior to in- place
preservation, the project sponsor and/or implementing
agency may implement such alternative measures.
• When preservation in pl ace or avoidance of historical or unique archaeological resources are infeasible, data
recovery through excavation shall be required (CEQA
Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)). Data recovery would
consist of approv al of a Data Recovery Plan and
archaeological ex cavation of an adequate sample of site contents so that research questions applicable to the site can be addressed. For prehistoric sites, local tribal
representatives should be afforded the opportunity to
monitor the ground- disturbing activities. If only part of a site would be impact ed by a project, data recovery shall only be necessary for that portion of the site. Data
recovery shall not be required if the implementing agency determines prior testing and s tudies have adequately
recovered the scientifically consequential information from the resources. Confidential studies and reports resulting from the data recovery shall be deposited with the
appropriate CHRIS Information Center. Archaeological
sites known to contain human remains shall be treated in accordance with the provisions o f Section 7050.5 Health and Safety Code or the provisions of NAGPRA on federal
or tribal lands. Mitigation may include curation for artifacts removed during data recovery excavation.
• If archaeological resources are discovered during
construction, all work near the find shall be halted and the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall follow the steps described under CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.5(f), including an immediat e evaluation of the find Stone Beetland Project 17
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
by a qualified archaeolo gist (36 CFR Section 61) and
implementation of avoidance measures or appropriate
mitigation if the find is determined to be a historical resource or unique archaeological resource. Consultation with or affording local tribal representatives the opportunity to monitor mitigative treatme nt may b e appropriate.

Should the find include human remains, the remains shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code or t he provisions of NAGPRA on federal or tribal lands. During evaluation or mitigative treatment, ground disturbance and construction work could continue on other parts of the project area.

MTP/SCS
MM CR-3:

Reduce visibility or accessibili ty of historical or unique archaeological resources.

The project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall determine whether or not implementation of a project would indirectly impact historical or unique archaeol ogical resources by increasing public visib
ility and ease of access. If so, the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall t ake measures to reduce the visibility or accessibility of the historical or unique archaeological resource to the public. Visi bility of the resource can be reduced through the use of decorative walls or vegetation screening. Accessibil ity can be reduced by installing fencing or vegetation barriers, particularly noxious vegetation such as poison oak or blackberry bushes. It is important to avoid creating an attractive nuis ance when protecting significant archaeological sites. Conspicuous walls or signs indicating that an area is restricted may result in more attempts to access the excluded area.

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
No known historical or
unique archeological
resources have been
discovered onsite. If
discovered during
construction, this
measure shall be
implemented as
determined necessary
by the City

IV. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

MTP/SCS
MM CR-4:

Conduct project spe cific paleontological resource studies and identify and implement mitigation.

Measures that shall be implemented, where feasible and
necessary to address site -specific i mpacts, include but ar e not City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to any ground
disturbing activities

Stone Beetland Project 18
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
limited to:

• The fossil yielding potential of the project area shall be determined by initially identifying the aerial and
stratigraphic extents of th e local geology, and then by performing a site- specific search of fossil loca lity records and peer-reviewed literature, as appropriate, by a qualified professional paleontologist, established state
clearinghouse such as the UCMP, and/or by an
established paleontological repository. A field survey by a qualified professional paleont ologist to assess the
paleontological sensitivity of the project area may be
warranted if the preliminary review is inconclusive.
• If a project area is f ound to contain or be in t he near vicinity of previously identified paleo- resources, or to be located within an area of high, moderate, or undetermined paleontological resource sensitivity, the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall retain a qual ified
professional paleontologist prior to construction to conduct a survey, as warranted, to locate su rface fossil
concentrations and to assess the sensiti vity of the project area for unique paleontological resources. After
completion of the survey, the q ualified paleontologist shall complete a technical report documenting the resul ts of all work, and incl ude any mitigation rec ommendations
specific to the pr oject. This study shall comply with
standards in the industry such as the Standard
Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Nonrenewable Paleontological Resources and
applicable regulations (SVP 2010).
• If the study indicates the project area is located in an area rich with paleontological resources, the study may
recommend that the project sponsor and/or implementing agency retain a qualified paleontologis t to prepare a
Paleontology Mitigation Plan an d monitor subsurface
Stone Beetland Project 19
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
disturbance, such as grading, excavation, and trenching.

Construction protocols to ensure that contractors tak e appropriate measures to avoid destroying fossil materials discovered during c onstruction shall also b e established by the project sponsor and/or implementing agency.
• Any area of known unique paleontological resources
within a project area shall be avoided during construction if feasible. If avoidance of known resources is infeasible or a project has been identified as potenti ally directly or indirectly imp acting, damaging or destroying a unique
paleontological resource, treatment measures for
nonrenewable unique paleontological r esources may
include appropriate documentation and/or salvage
measures for fossils, microfossils, or matrix in consultation with t he project sponsor and/or implementing agency.

Treatment shall comply with regulatory requirements.

Measures may include plans for sampling and data
recovery. All final documentat ion of mitigation treatment for paleontological resources to be impacted by the project shall be approved by the project sponsor and/or
implementing agency prior to the initiati on of any project ground-disturbing activities.
• If fossils or other paleontolo gical resources are
encountered during construction, all work shall be halted within a minimum 30-foot radius of the find and a qualified paleontologist shall be contacted to ex amine the find and evaluat
e its significance. If the find is deemed to have
significant scientific valu e, the paleontologist and the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall
coordinate with the property owner to formulate a plan to either avoid impacts, document the resourc
e, or to
continue construction without disturbing the integrity of the find ( e.g., by excavating th e material containing the resources). Consistent with regulatory requirements,
recommendations determined by the qualified professional Stone Beetland Project 20
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
paleontologist, proje ct sponsor, and/or implementing
agency to be necessar y and feasible shall be
implemented before construction activities can resume at the site where the paleontological resources were
discovered.

IV-1: Prior to approval of construction p ermits, the applicant shall retain a qualified geologist to prepare a site- specific design- level geotechnical exploration as part of the des ign process. The exploration shall include laboratory soil testing to provide additional dat a for preparation of spe cific recommendations regarding the following items:

• Grading, existing fill removal, and fill compaction;
• Consolidation settlement;
• Liquefaction settlement;
• Site Specific Seismic Hazard Analysis (if required);
• Foundation design;
• Retaining walls;
• Site drainage and landscaping irrigation; and
• Pavement recommendations.

The project design shall adhere to all engineering
recommendations provided in the site- specific design- level geotechnical exploration. Proof of compliance with all
recommendations specified i n the site -specific design- level geotechnical exploration shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.

City Engineer Prior to the approval of
construction permits

V.GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

MTP/SCS
MM GHG-3:

Implement all feasible on - and off -site mitigatio n measures to reduce GHG emissions below a lead agency –approved threshold of si gnificance. The applicable lead agency can and should implement, where necessary and f easible to address site- specific construction climate change impacts, the following measure s to avoid or minimize impacts related to construction GHG emissions:

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
During construction
activities

Stone Beetland Project 21
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
• Project proponents shall require its contractors to restrict the idling of on- and off-road diesel equipment to no more than 5 minutes while the equipment is on-site.
• Project proponents of new facilities shall implement waste, disposal, and recycling strategies ( i.e., 10 percent
recycled content for Tier 1 and 15 percent recycled
content for Tier 2) in accordance with the volu ntary
measures for non- residential land uses contained in
Section A5.405 of the 2016 CALGreen Code or in
accordance with any update to these requirements in
future iterations of the CALGreen Code in place at the
time of project construction.
• Project propo nents of new facilities shall achieve or exceed the enhanced Tier 2 target for nonresidential land uses of recycling or reusing 80 percent of the construction waste as described in Section A5.408 of the 2016
CALGreen Code or i n accordance with any update t o
these requirements in future iteratio ns of the CALGreen Code in place at the time of project construction.
• Project proponents shall requi re all diesel -powered, off - road construction equipment meet EPA’s Tier 3 or Tier 4 emissions standards as defined in 40 CFR 1039 and
comply with the exhaus t emission test proced ures and
provisions of 40 CFR Parts 1065 and 1068. This measure
can also be achieved by using battery -electric off -road equipment as it becomes available.
• Project proponents shall implement a pr ogram that
incentivizes construction workers to carpool, and/ or use public transit or electric vehicles to commute to and from the project site.

V-1: The following requirements shall be noted on project improve ment plans, subject to review and approval by the City of Sacramento Community Development Department:

• The proposed project shall be designed such that all
City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the approval of
project improvement
plans

Stone Beetland Project 22
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
project components, with the exception of any restaurant kitchens, are buil t all- electric. To offset kitchen natural gas usage the proposed project shall include a renewable energy system that generates at least 16,372.93 kWh/yr
beyond Title 24 CALGree n requirements, or implement
other means as deemed feasible by the City and
SMAQMD to offset the propos ed natural gas usage, such
as the inclusion of pre-wiring to allow for the future retrofit of natural gas appliances with all-electric appliances; and • Each structure shall be constructed to include an electric vehicle (EV) ready par king space, consistent w ith
SMAQMD BMP 2.

VII. NOISE

MTP/SCS
MM NOI-1:

Employ measures to reduce noise from new land uses and
transportation projects.

For projects that hav e not undergone previo us noise study and that exceed acceptable noise thresholds, the implementing agency shall require a project -level evaluation of nois e impacts in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local noise standards. Where significant i mpacts are identified, applicable mitigation measures shall be implemented, to reduce noise to be in compliance with applicable noise standards. Mitigation designed to reduce noise impacts would apply to construction and operation of new development within the projected land us e pattern as well as planned transportation improvements. Measur es that shall be implemented, where feasible and necessary to addres s site - specific impacts include, but are not limited to, the following:

• constructing barriers in the form of outdoor barriers, sound walls, buildings, or earth berms to attenuate noise at
adjacent sensitive uses;
• make mechanical modifications, operational modifications, or other changes to transit systems to improved
soundproofing and minimize unwanted no ise, particularly City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to the approval of
project improvement
plans

Stone Beetland Project 23
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
during sensitive times/hours.
• using land use planning measur es, such as zoning,
restrictions on development, site design, and buffers to ensure that future development is compatible with
adjacent transportation facilities and land uses;
• constructing roadways s o that they are depressed below - grade of the existing sensitive land uses to create an
effective barrier between new roadway lanes, roadways,
rail lines, transit centers, park -n-ride lots, and other new noise generating facilities;
• maximizing the distance between noise- sensitive land uses and new noise- generating facilities and
transportation systems;
• improving the acoustical insulation, window quality, and/or other soundproofing of dwelling units (existing or
proposed) where setbacks and sound barriers do not
sufficiently reduce noise; and
• using rubberized asphalt or “quiet pavemen t” to reduce road noise for new roadway segments, roadw ays in which widening or other modifications require re- pavement, or normal reconstruction of roadways where re- pavement is planned.

MTP/SCS
MM NOI-3:

Reduce noise, vibration, and groundb orne noise generated by construction act ivities. Measures that c an and should be implemented to reduce noise, vibration, and groundborne noise generated by construction activities, where feasible and necessary to address site- specific considerations include, but are not limited to, the following:

• restrict construction activities to permitte d hours in accordance with local jurisdiction regulations
• properly maintain construction equipment and outfit
construction equipment with the best available noise
suppression devices (e.g., mufflers, silencers, wraps); • prohibit id ling of construction eq uipment for extended City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
During construction
activities

Stone Beetland Project 24
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
periods of time in the vicinity of sensitive receptors; • locate s tationary equipment such as generators,
compressors, rock crushers, and cement mixers as far
from sensitive receptors as possible; and
• predrill pile holes to the maximum feasible depth, provided that pile driving is necessary for construction.

XIV. TRANSPORTATION

MTP/SCS
MM TRN-3:

Apply best practice strategies to reduce the localized im pact from construction activities on the transportation system.

• Implementing agencies shall require implementation
of best practice strategies regarding construction
activities on the transportatio n system an d apply
recommended appl icable mitigation measu res as
defined by state and federal agencies. Exampl es of
mitigation measu res should include, but are not
limited to, the following:
• Apply special construction techniques to minimize
impacts to traffic flow a nd provide adequate access
to important destinations in the area.
• Develop circulation and detour p lans to minimize
impacts to local street impacts from construction
activity on nearby major arterials. This may include
the use of signing and flagging to gu ide vehicles
through and/or around the construction zone.
• Establish truck “usage” routes that minim ize truck
traffic on local roadways to the extent possible.
• Schedule truck trips outside of peak morning and
evening commute hours.
• Route truck trips to av oid roadway segments wit h at risk or failed pavement conditions.
• Limit the number of lane closures during peak hours
to the extent possible.
• Identify detours for bicycles and pedestrians in all
City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to and during
construction activities

Stone Beetland Project 25
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
areas potentially affected by project constructio n and provide adequate signage to mark these routes.
• Install traffic control devices as specified in the
California Department of T ransportation Manual of
Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance
Work Zones.
• Develop and implement access plans for potential ly
impacted local servic es such as police and f ire
stations, transit stations, hospitals, schools and
parks. The access p lans should be developed with
the facility owner or administrator. To minimize
disruption of emergency vehicle access, affec ted
jurisdictions should be asked t o identify detours for
emergency vehicles, which will then be posted by the
contractor. Store con struction materials only in
designated areas that minimize impacts to nearby
roadways.
• Coordinate with local transit agencies for temporary
relocation of rout es or bus stops in work s zones, as
necessary.
• Conduct a public information campaign about how to
use transit and other methods to reduce single-
occupant vehicle use.
• Coordinate with l ocal police, fire, sheriff, and
emergency servi ces regarding closures i ncluding
magnitude and duration of closure.

XIV. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

MTP/SCS
MM CR-5:

Conduct project -specific consul tation wit h traditionally and culturally affiliated Calif ornia Native American tribes to identify tribal cultural resources and implement project-specific mitigation.

If the implementing agency determines that a project may cause a substantial adverse change to a T CR, and measures are not otherwise identified in the consultation process under PRC Section 21080.3.2, the following mitigation measures described at PRC City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
If the project is
determined to cause a
substantial adverse
change to a tribal
cultural resource

Stone Beetland Project 26
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
Section 21084.3 shall be implemented, where feasible and necessary, to address site -specific impacts i n order to avoid or minimize the significant adverse impacts:

• Avoidance and preservation of the TCRs in place,
including, but not limited to, planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context, or planning greenspace, parks, or other open
space, to incorpora te the resources with culturally
appropriate protection and management criteria;
• Treating the TCR with culturally appropriate digni ty taking into account the tribal c ultural values and meaning of th e resource, including, but not lim ited to: protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource; or
protecting the traditional use of the resource; protecting the confidentiality of the resource;
• Permanent conser vation easements or other inte rests in real property, with cultural ly appropriate management
criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places; or
• Protecting the resource.

MTP/SCS
MM CR-6:

Reduce visibility or accessibility of tribal cultural resources.

Measures that shall be implemented for projects that have an ND, MND, or EIR include:

The project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall determine whether or not implementation of a pro ject would indirectly impact TCRs by increasing public visibility and ease of access. If so, the project sponsor and/or implementing agency shall take measures to reduce the visibility or accessibility of the TCR
to the public.

Visibility of the resource c an be reduced through the use of decorative walls or vegetation screening. Accessibility can be reduced by installing fencing or vegetation barriers, particularly noxious vegetation such a s poison oak or blackber ry bushes. It is City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
No known historical or
unique archeological
resources have been
discovered onsite. If
discovered during
construction, this
measure shall be
implemented as
determined necessary
by the City

Stone Beetland Project 27
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
important to avoid creating an attractive nuisance when protecting TCRs. Conspicuous walls or signs indicating that an area is restricted may result in more attempts to access the excluded area.

TCR-1a: Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity an d A wareness Training Program Prior to Ground Disturbing Activities

The City shall require the applicant/contractor to provide a tribal cultural resources se nsitivity and awareness training program (Worker Environmental Awareness Program [WEAP]) for all personnel involved in project con
struction, including field
consultants and construction workers. The WEAP will be
developed in coordination with culturally affiliated Native American tribes. The WEAP shall be conducted before any project -related construction activities begin at the project site. The WEAP will include relevant information regarding sensitive tribal cultural resources, including applicable regulations, protocols for avoidance, a nd consequences of violating State laws and regulations.

The WEAP will also describe appropriate avoidance and impact minimization measures for tribal cultural resources that could be located at the project site and will outline what to do and who to contact if any potential tribal cultural resources are encountered.

The WEAP will emphasize the requi rement for confidentiality and culturally appropriate treatment of any discovery of significance to Native Americans and will discuss appropriate behaviors and responsive actions, consistent with Native American tribal values.

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
Prior to construction
activities

TCR-1b: Tribal Monitoring

The applicant shall retain one (1) monitor from Wilton Rancheria to monitor all ground disturbing activity within 200 feet of the Morrison Creek channel, where alluvial de posits are likely to be present and could mask buried archaeological sites. Tribal monitoring is not required beyo nd 200 feet, where the National Wilton Rancheria

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
The project applicant
shall provide 48-hour
notification to the tribe
prior to activities
requiring monitoring
(i.e., ground disturbing
activities within 200

Stone Beetland Project 28
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
Resources Con servation Service has mapped the presence of clays, or during above-surface construction activities. If alluvium is found to extend beyond 250 feet, then monitoring shall occur until clay is encountered.

The monitor shall possess the knowledge, skills, a bilities, and experience established by the tribe. The applicant shall provide 48-hour advance notice to the monitor prior to activities requiring monitoring.

The monitor will be co mpensated for his/her time. T he mechanism for reimbursing the tribal monit or will be at the discretion of the applicant/developer, and would include: Tribal Cultural Monit ors from Wilton Rancheria, contracted through Wilton Rancheria.

If tribal cultural r esources are found during ground dis turbing activities, the procedures in Mitigation Measure TCR -1c shall apply.
feet of the Morrison
Creek Channel)
TCR-1c: In the Event that Tribal Cultural Resources Are Discovered During Construction, Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures to Avoid Significant Impacts and Procedures to Evaluate Resources.

If tribal cultur al resources (such as structural features, unusual amounts of bone or shell, artifact s, or human remains) are encountered at the project site during construction, work shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find (based on the apparent distribution of cultural materials), and the construction contractor shall immediately notify the project’s City representative along with the appropriate authorities. Avoidance and preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to tr ibal cultural resources.

This will be accomplished, if feasible, by several alternative means, including:

City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
If tribal cultural
resources (such as
structural features,
unusual amounts of
bone or shell, artifacts,
or human remains) are
encountered at the
project site during
construction

Stone Beetland Project 29
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
• Planning construction to avoid tribal cultural resources, archaeological sites and/or other cultural resources;
incorporating cultural resources within parks, green-space or other open space; covering archaeological resources; deeding a cultural resource to a permanent conservation easement; or other preservation and protection methods
agreeable to consulting parties and regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over the activity.
• Recommendations for avoidance of tribal cultural
resources will be review ed by t he City representative, interested culturally affiliated Native American tribes and other appropriate agencies, in light of factors such as costs, logistics, feasibility, design, technology and social, cultural and environmental considerations, and the extent to which avoidance is consistent with project objectives.

Avoidance and design alternatives may include
realignment within the project site to avoid tribal cult ural resources, modification of the design to elimi nate or
reduce impacts to tribal c ultural resources or modification or realignment to avoid highly significant features within a cultural resource or tribal cultural resource.
• Native American representatives from interested culturally affiliated Native American tribes will be notified to r eview and comment on these analyses and shall have the
opportunity to meet with the City representative and its representatives who have technical expert ise to identify and recommend feasible avoidance and design
alternatives, so that appropriate and feasi ble avoidance and design alternatives can be identified.
• If the discovered tribal cultural resource can be avoided, the construction contractor(s), will install protective fencing outside the site boundary, including a 100-foot buffer area, before construction restarts. The boundary of a tribal
cultural resource will be determined in consultation with interested culturally af filiated Native American tribes and Stone Beetland Project 30
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
tribes will b e notified to monitor the installation of fencing.

Use of temporary and permanent for ms of protective
fencing will be determined in consultation with Native
American representatives from interested culturall y
affiliated Native American tribes.
• The construction contractor(s) will maintain the protective fencing throughout construction to avoid the site during all remaining phases of construction. The area will be
demarcated as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area”.

If a tribal cultural resource cannot be avoided, the following performance standard shall be met prior to continuance of construction and associated activities that may result in damage to or destruction of tribal cultural resources:

• Each resource wil l be evaluated for California Register of Historical Resources - (CRHR) eligibility through
application of established eligibility cri teria (California Code of Regulations 15064.636), in consultation with
consulting Native American Tribes, as applicable.

If a tribal cultural resource i s determined to be eligible for listing in the CRHR, the City will av oid damaging effects to the resour ce in accordance with California PRC Section 21084.3, if feasible. The City shall coordinate the investigation of the find with a qualified archaeologist (meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Archeology) approved by the City and with interested culturally affiliated Native American tribes that respond to the City’s notification. As part of the site investigation and resource assessment, the City and the archaeologist shall consult with interested culturally affil iated Native American tribes to assess the significance of the find, make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary and provide proper management r
ecommendations should potential impacts to the
resources b e determined by the City to be significant. A written Stone Beetland Project 31
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
report detailing the site assessment, coordination activities, and management recommendations shall be provided to the City representative by the qualified archaeologist. These
recommendations wi ll be documented in the project record. For any recommendations made by interested culturally affiliated Native American tribes that are not implemented, a j ustification for why the recommendation was not followed will be provided in the project record.

Native American representatives fro m interested culturally affiliated Native American Tribes and the City representative will also consult to develop measures for long- term management of any discovered tribal cultural resources. Consultati on will be limited to actions consistent with the jurisdiction of the City and taking into account ownership of the subject property. To the extent that the City has jurisdict ion, routine operation and maintenance within tribal cultural resources retaining tribal cultural integrity shall be consistent with the avoidance and minimization standards identified in this mitigation measure.

If the City determines that the project ma y cause a significant impact t o a tribal cultura l resource, and measures are not otherwise identifi ed in the consultation process, th e following are examples of mitigation capable of avoiding or substantially lessening potential significant impacts to a tr ibal cultural resource or alternatives that would avoid significant impacts to the resource.

These measures may be considered to avoi d or minimize
significant adverse impacts and constitute the standard by which an impact conclusion of less-than significant may be reached:

• Avoid and preserve resources in place, including, but not limited to, planning c onstruction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context, or planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate
the resou rces with culturally appropria te protection and Stone Beetland Project 32
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
management criteria.
• Treat the resource with culturally appropriate dignity taking into account the Tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following:
• Protect the cultural character and integrity of the resource. • Protect the traditional use of the resource.
• Protect the confidentiality of the resource.
• Establish permanent conservation ease ments or other
interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or
using the resources or places.
• Protect the resource.

TCR-1d: Implement Procedures in the Event of the Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains.

If an inadvertent discovery of human remains is made at any time during project -related construction activities or project planning, the City the following performance standards shall be met prior to implementing or cont inuing actions such as construction, which may result in damage to or destruction of human remains. In accordance with the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), if human remains are encountered during ground - disturbing activities, the City shall immediately halt potentially damaging excavation in the area of the remains and notify the Sacramento County Coroner and a professional archaeologist to determine the nature of the remains. The Coroner is required to examine all discoveries of human remains within 48 hours of receiving notice of a discovery on private or State lands (HSC Section 7050.5[b]).

If the human remains are of historic age and are determined to be not of Native American origin, the City will fo llow the provisions of the HSC Section 7000 (et seq.) regarding the disinterment and removal of non-Native American human remains.

If the Coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department

County Coroner

NAHC, if coroner
determines remains
are Native American
If an inadvertent
discovery of human
remains is made at
any time during
project-related
construction activities
or project planning

Stone Beetland Project 33
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
American, he or she must contact the Native American Herita ge Commission (NAHC) by phone within 24 hour s of making that determination (HSC Section 7050[c]). After the Coroner’s findings have been made, the NAHC -designated Most Likely Descendant (MLD), in consultation with t he landowner along with the MLD, shall determine the ultimate treatment and dispositi on of the remains. The responsibilities of the City for acting upon notification of a discovery of Native American human remains are identified in California PRC Section 5097.9 et seq.

XV. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

MTP/SCS
MM USS-2:

Implement water conservation strategies.

The implementing agency can and should addi tionally implement measures regarding water conservation, efficiency, conservation, capture, and reuse identified by water suppliers in state, regional, and local plans, laws, and pol icies, and in thei r own plans and ordinances during planning, design, and project-level environment review, const ruction, operations, and maintenance activi ties.

Measures include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Install drip or other water -conserving or weather -based irrigation systems for landscaping.
• Coordinate with the relevant water service provider to ensure that the provider has adequate suppl ies and
infrastructure to accommodate the increase in demand. If the current infrastructure servicing the project site is found to be inadequate, infrastructure improvements shall be identified in each project’s CEQA documentation. This can and should be d ocumented in the form of an SB 610
Water Supply Assessment, an SB 221 Water Supply
Verification, or other capacity analysis.
• Design future projects to reduce the use of potable water for landscape irrigation (xeri scaping). These design
components could inc lude drought -tolerant plantings for landscaping, water-efficient irrigation systems, the capture City of Sacramento
Community
Development
Department
During planning,
design, and project-
level environment
review, construction,
operations, and
maintenance activities

Stone Beetland Project 34
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program July 2023

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

STONE BEETLAND PROJECT
Mitigation
Number Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule Sign-off
and use of rainwater, and the use of water -conserving fixtures (such as dual -flush toilets, waterless urinals, reduced flow faucets, EnergyStar appliances).
• For projects located in an area with existing reclaimed water conveyance infrastructure and excess reclaimed
water capacity , these future projects shall use reclaimed water for non-potable uses, such as landscape i rrigation, ornamental water features, concr ete mixing, and dust
control. For projects in a location planned for future
reclaimed water service, projects should i nstall dual plumbing systems in anticipation of future use. Large
developments could treat wast ewater onsite to tertiary standards and use it for non-potable uses onsite.
• Consider adoption of Tier 1 or Tier 2 Cal Green standards as mandatory local requirements.

MTP/SCS
MM USS-3:

Implement Mitigation Measure AES-8 through AES 12
Implement Mitigation Measure AG-8
Implement Mitigation Measure AIR-6
Implement Mitigation Measures BIO-1a through BIO-7
Implement Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-6
Implement Mitigation Measure GHG-3
Implement Mitigation Measure NOI-3
Implement Mitigation Measure TRN-3
See MTP/SCS
Mitigation Measures
AES-8 through AES
12, AG-8, AIR-6, BIO-
1a through BIO-7, CR-
1 through CR-6, GHG-
3, NOI-3, TRN-3
See MTP/SCS
Mitigation Measures
AES-8 through AES
12, AG-8, AIR-6, BIO-
1a through BIO-7, CR-
1 through CR-6, GHG-
3, NOI-3, TRN-3

RESOLUTION NO. 2023–
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2035 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AND URBAN FORM DIAGRAM TO 67.6± ACRES OF TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEDIUM DENSITY, 30.3± ACRES OF PARK AND RECREATION, 11.6± ACRES OF PUBLIC QUASI PUBLIC, 23.6± ACRES OF URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD MEDIUM DENSITY, AND 7.6± ACRES OF TRADITIONAL CENTER, ON APPROXIMATELY 140.7± ACRES CONSISTENT WITH THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (APNs: 053-0010-048, 053-0010-049,053-0010-076,119-0080-001,119- 0080-051, AND 119-0090-016) (P21-042)

BACKGROUND
A. On March 3, 2015, Council adopted the 2035 General Plan (Resolution 2015-0061).

B. On July 27, 2023, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on, and forwarded to the City Council, a recommendation to approve the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Project (P21-042).

C. On October 10, 2023, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 and 17.812.030

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The amendments are internally consistent with the goals, policies, and other provisions of the general plan in that: a) The proposed development is consistent with the Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, Parks and Recreation, Public Quasi Public, Urban Neighborhood Medium Density, and Traditional Center designations which provides for a mix of housing, open space and recreation, and a variety of retail uses; b) The project provides an integrated system of parks, open space areas, and recreational facilities that will be safe and connect the diverse communities of Sacramento ; and c) The project is developing a n underutilized vacant site with an array of housing types to provide an opportunity for high density housing near existing public transportation and create more inclusive and equitable neighborhoods.

Section 2. The amendments promote the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the city in that : a) The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding residential, and commercial land uses and densities; b) provides an interconnected street system with pedestrian-scaled blocks and bicycle amenities; and c) provides for the necessary infrastructure to fully serve the project.

Section 3. The proposed zoning classification of the site is R-1A, Multi-Unit Dwelling (R- 2A), Multi-Unit Dwelling (R-4), and Limited Commercial (C-1) and is consistent with the proposed general plan land use designation s of Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, Parks and Recreation, Public Quasi -Public, Urban Neighborhood Medium De nsity, and Traditional Center because the densities and building heights allowed under this zoning are compatible with the height recommendations and minimum density of 20 dwelling units per net acre, as specified under the criteria for a Transit Priority Project.

Section 4. Based on verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing, the City Council approves the 2035 General Plan Land Use and Urban Form Diagram Amendment as set forth in Exhibit A and text amendments as set forth in Exhibit B.

Section 5. Exhibit A is part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – General Plan Amendment Exhibit
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ALBION WAYBURLINGTON WAYDETROIT BLVDDEERHAVEN WAY
FUTURE 24TH STREET

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

MORRISON CREEK

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOODDEERFIELD-MESAGRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

DETROITNEIGHBORHOOD

PARKS& RECUNMTCTNM
TNMPQP

PARKS& REC

53.1 AC16.3 AC7.6 AC23.6 AC14.5 AC11.6 AC

14.0 AC

DEERFIELD-MESAGRANDENEIGHBORHOODMORRISON CREEK

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

BURLINGTON WAYDETROIT BLVDDEERHAVEN WAY

DETROITNEIGHBORHOODALBION WAY

PARKS & RECTNM
TNL
PARKS& RECTNHPQP81.7 AC8.5 AC9.6 AC17.9 AC

9.0 AC

14.0 AC
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT_2023.07.10.DWG CITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1" = 350' DATE: JULY 10, 2023 1,0507003500 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456Mayer Consulting Inc.Planning + DesignPO Box 2042Davis, CA 95617

STONE BEETLANDGENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT EXHIBIT

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USEDESIGNATIONSPROPOSED GENERAL PLANDESIGNATIONSLEGEND FIGURE 2

ORDINANCE NO. 2023-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE SACRAMENTO CITY CODE BY REZONING TO 52.2± GROSS ACRES OF SINGLE-UNIT OR DUPLEX DWELLING ZONE (R-1A), 35.5± GROSS ACRES OF MULTI-UNIT DWELLING ZONE (R-2A-PUD),

31.4± GROSS ACRES OF MULTI-UNIT DWELLING ZONE R-4-PUD), AND 7.6± GROSS ACRES OF LIMITED COMMERCIAL ZONE (C-1-PUD) AND STONE

BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (APNs: 053-0010-048, 053- 0010-049,053-0010-076,119-0080-001,119-0080-051, AND 119-0090-016) (P21-042)

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO:

SECTION 1

As used in this ordinance, “Property” means the real property depicted in attached and incorporated in Exhibit A and contains six (6) APNs.

SECTION 2

Title 17 of the Sacramento City Code (“Planning and Development Code”) is hereby amended by rezoning to 52.2± gross acres of Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling zone (R- 1A), 35.5± gross acres of Multi-Unit Dwelling zone (R-2A-PUD), 31.4± gross acres of Multi-Unit Dwelling zone (R-4-PUD), and 7.6± gross acres of Limited Commercial zone (C-1-PUD) and Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development, in accordance with the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development project, as shown on Exhibit A.

SECTION 3

As required by section 17.808.230.C.1.d of the Planning and Development Code, the City Council finds that the rezoning of the property is consistent with the General Plan, proposed use, and development standards in that the project provides for infill development on an underutilized piece of property with residential and commercial, that are comparable with the surrounding uses and neighborhood. The proposed project complies with the proposed General Plan designations of Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, Parks and Recreation, Public Quasi-Public, Urban Neighborhood Medium Density, and Traditional Center. Furthermore, the project promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City by facilitating new uses consistent with the neighboring residential and commercial uses, is designed to maximize pedestrian, bicycle, vehicle, and transit connectivity, and designed to minimize impacts on neighboring residential neighborhoods.

SECTION 4

The City Clerk is hereby directed to amend the City’s official zoning maps to conform with this ordinance.

SECTION 5

Exhibit A is part of this ordinance.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A: Rezone Map
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ALBION WAYBURLINGTON WAYDETROIT BLVDDEERHAVEN WAY
FUTURE 24TH STREET

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

MORRISON CREEK

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD
R-1A PUD
R-1A PUDR-4 PUD
AC-1 PUDR2-A (PUD)

DEERFIELD-MESAGRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

DETROITNEIGHBORHOOD

30.2 AC35.5 AC7.6 AC31.4 AC22.0 AC

14.0 AC

MORRISON CREEK

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

BURLINGTON WAYDETROIT BLVD
R-1AR-1-R
A

DEERFIELD-MESAGRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

DETROITNEIGHBORHOODALBION WAY

DEERHAVEN WAY

89.5 AC37.2 AC

14.0 AC
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_REZONING_2023.07.10.DWG
CITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1" = 350' DATE: JULY 10, 2023 1,0507003500 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456Mayer Consulting Inc.Planning + DesignPO Box 2042Davis, CA 95617

STONE BEETLANDEXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONSPROPOSED ZONINGDESIGNATIONSLEGEND FIGURE 2REZONING EXHIBIT
RESOLUTION NO. 2023–
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023

RESOLUTION APPROVING THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND SCHEMATIC PLAN (P21-042)

BACKGROUND

A. On July 27, 2023, the City Planning and Design Commission held public hearings and reviewed and commented on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Project and voted to forward its recommendation to the City Council.

B. On October 10 , 2023 , after giving notice as requi red by Sacramento City Code section 17.812.010.2.b and 17.812.030, the City Council held a public hearing and received and considered evidence on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development, the City Council adopts the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Schematic Plan (together, the “PUD”) as set forth in Exhibits A and B.

Section 2. The Council’s approval of the PUD is based on the following findings of fact:

A. The adoption of the PUD is consistent with the applic able general plan land use designation, use, and development standards; the goals, policies, and other provisions of the general plan; there is no applicable specific plan to this site;
B. The adoption of the PUD promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the city in that the PUD anticipates future development patterns for the entire site and provides standards and guidelines for a well-designed infill community that is consistent the goals and policies of the General Plan; and
C. The zoning classification of the subject parcel is consistent with the proposed designation of a planned unit development, or adoption of or amendment to the planned unit development schematic plan and development guidelines.

Section 3. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings held on October 10 , 2023 , the City Council hereby adopts the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development set forth in Exhibits A and B.

Section 4. Exhibits A and B are part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Guidelines Exhibit B – Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

Stone Beetland

PUD GUIDELINES
Prepared for

JP Landholdings, LLC

July 2023

Table of Contents

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION PAGE

1.1 Purpose and Intent 1

1.2 Context and Applicability 1

1.3 Land Use Mix 3

1. 4 Circ ula tion System - Stree ts and Non-Vehicula r 5

1. 5 Parks and Open Space 5

1.6 Procedures for Approval and Amendments 5

SECTION 2: PLANNING STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

2. 1 Development Standards 7

2.2 Design Guidelines 12

PUD GUIDELINES 1

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose and Intent

The Stone Beetland PUD Guidelines contain discussion and guiding language, details, conditions and restrictions to direct the build-out of the Stone Beetland Plan Area (Plan Area). To achieve the overriding goal to develop a new high quality residential community, these PUD Guidelines are formulated in a flexible manner to allow creative solutions to a variety of design situations.

These guidelines are intended as a supplement to the development regulations in Title 17 of the City of Sacramento Development Code. These guidelines shall prevail when there is a difference, otherwise the regulations of Title 17 shall be applicable.

1.2 Context and Applicability

The Plan Area, approximately 140.7 acres in size, is located south of the Detroit Boulevard Neighborhood and west of the Deerfield Mesa Grande Neighborhood, separated by Sacramento Regional Transit's Blue Line light rail route and Morrison Creek.

A 14.0- acre portion of the Plan Area located in the southeast corner, currently owned by SRCSD, is not included in these PUD Guidelines. The land use for this area is detention basin and open space, which is consistent with the existing zoning of Agriculture.

The south boundary of the Plan Area is Cosumnes River
Boulevard, the west boundary is the extensi on of 24th Avenue, the east boundary is along Morrison Creek and the north boundary is irregular, abutting the City of Sacramento site and abutting the Detroit Boulevard Neighborhood in the northeast corner of the Plan Area.

The Plan Area has been organized into 4 sub- areas:

The Transit Village, the North Village, Central Village and West Village as shown in Exhibit 1. The PUD
Schematic Plan, Exhibit 2, is shown on page 4.

Exhibit 1: Sub Areas/Villages

PUD GUIDELINES 2

Stone Beetland is a Transit Priority Project (TPP), which is a new type of project created by SB 375. As a TPP, the project is required to incorporate and comply with the following criteria:
1) At least 50% of total site must be designated for residential use. 2) Be consistent with the use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies of the regional sustainable community’s strategy.
3) Be located within ½ mile of a high‐quality transit corridor included in the regional transportation plan (No parcel shall be more than 25% further, and less than 10% of units, no or more than 100 units further than 0.5 miles). 4) Achieves a minimum of 20 dwelling units to the net acre.

Consistent with the TPP criteria, the density and intensity of the land uses is highest at the eastern edge adjacent to the Transit Stop and gradually decreases towards the north and west. The West Village, which is beyond the ½ mile distance from the transit stop, has a maximum of 100 primary dwelling units. The minimum overall density of 20 dwelling units per net acre must be maintained.

The West Village and North Villages are anticipated to include single-unit detached housing products which will conform to the R-1A Single-Unit/ Duplex Dwelling Zone and development standards pursuant to Section 17.204 Article III of the City Code.

The three HDR parcels in the Transit Village will conform to R-4 Multi Unit Zone and development standards pursuant to Section

17.208 Article V of the City Code. The 6 acre Commercial parcel within the Transit Village will conform to C -1, Limited Commercial Zone and development standards pursuant to Section 17.216 Article VI of the City Code.

The Central Village anticipates for a variety of creative lot types, such as compact detached lots, halfplexes, I-courts, courtyard homes, bungalows, condominiums and townhomes. The underlying zone is R-2A, however the anticipated housing products willnot conform to the minimum lot area, dimensions , driveway lengths and setback requirements of the R -2A zone and development standards per Section 17.208 Article I of the City Code . Section 2.1 of these PUD Guidelines provides development standards for the Central Village.

1.3 Land Use Mix

Table 1-1 Land Use Mix lists the anticipated housing types for each Village, however these PUD Guidelines are intended to allow the flexibility to change housing types within any village in response to changing market conditions subject to the following:

1. The overall net density of the Plan Area may not be less than 20 units per net residential acre. Net acres is defined as follows: “Acre, net” means the total area of a site excluding land dedicated to a public agency for parks, public buildings, schools, PUD GUIDELINES 3

street right-of-way, and utility facilities; private park and recreation facilities that receive parkland dedication credit under this code; and private street right-of-way when built to city street standards.

2. The total number of dwelling units to be built within a particular village shall fall within the PUD Density Range and Anticipated DU’s as listed in Table 1-1. However, the total number of dwelling units in the West Village (if adjusted, any portion of the West Village beyond ½ mile from the Transit Stop) may not exceed 100 primary residential dwelling units. Accessory dwelling units (ADU’s) are permitted by right u nder state law (Gov’t Code §65852.2), as restated at City Code Section

17.228.105(G).

3. The boundaries of a particular Village as shown on by Exhibit 2 PUD Schematic Plan may be adjusted in response to more accurate subdivision improvement plans, final mapping, infrastructure phasing, or in response to market conditions without a PUD Amendment or any additional approvals if items 1 -2 above are satisfied and are consistent with the TPP/Regional Sustainable Community Strategy criteria.

TABLE 1-1: Residential Land Use Mix
Zoning
Designation
Zoning Max
Density
PUD Land Use
Designation
PUD Density
Range
Gross
Acres
Anticipate
d
DU
Net
Acres
Anticipated
Net Density
% of
D.U.’s
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-1 8.0 – 17.0 17.6 1001 11.9 8.4
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-2 8.0 – 17.0 7.5 54 5.7 9.5
R1-A (PUD) 2/lot LDR-3 8.0 – 17.0 5.1 36 3.7 9.7
LDR SUBTOTAL: 30.2 190 21.3 8.9 16.4%
R2-A(PUD) 17 MDR-1 8.0 – 17.0 15.1 152 10.0 15.2
R2-A(PUD) 17 MDR-2 8.0 – 17.0 9.9 110 7.5 14.8
MDR SUBTOTAL: 25.0 262 17.5 15.0 22.5%
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-1 40.0 - 60.0 5.4 241 5.4 44.6
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-2 40.0 - 60.0 5.3 198 4.6 44.0
R-4 (PUD) 60 HDR-3 400 - 60.0 7.2 272 6.5 41.2
HDR SUBTOTAL: 17.9 711 16.5 43.1 61.1%
RESIDENTIAL TOTAL: 73.1 1,163 55.3 21.0 100.0%
Table 1.1 Footnotes:

1. LDR-1 is capped at 100 maximum primary dwelling units.

2. In order to achieve the minimum density of 20.0 units per net acre per the TPP policy, the total of LDR, MDR and HDR must achieve 1,106 units, as a minimum.

PUD GUIDELINES 4

Exhibit 2: PUD Schematic Plan

PUD GUIDELINES 5

1. 4 Circ ula tion System - Stree ts and Non-Vehicula r

Stone Beetland incorporates the values of new urbanism and smart growth. A modified grid pattern of streets is utilized to provide excellent connectivity between neighbors and separated sidewalks and street tree plantings will provide for a pleasant, shaded walking environment. The Mobility Framework Plan, Exhibit 3, is shown on page 6.

The circulation system and streetscapes are significant factors in determining the character and identity of a community.

Placement of curb bulb- outs may be considered at var ious locations in the project to serve as a traffic calming devices and provide a pedestrian priority intersection designs, such as the primary entry into Stone Beetland community on C Street near the CMU site in the Transit Village. The circulation system should be logical, predictable, and designed to promote safety for all transportation modes, particularly pedestrians and bicyclists.

The residential village neighborhoods are designed to provide a mix of housing types which are integrated and interconnected.

Each of the four Villages are oriented with a park or open space as a central focal element. All residents will be within a 5 minute walk (1/4 mile) to a park, activity area or greenbelt trail. In addition, approximately 80% of the total residences are less than 10 minute walk (½ mile) to the Light Rail stop. Tree lined streets, convenient access to trails and safe street crossings will promote a neighborhood identity of connectedness and interaction. Convenient bicycle and pedestrian paths will encourage these modes of transportation, thereby reducing vehicular trips.

1. 5 Parks and Open Space

Approximately 23% of the site is dedicated to public parks, landscape corridors, open spaces, landscape lots and drainage basins. The Mobility Plan on page 6 illustrates these facilities. The public areas provide a visual amenity for the enjoyment of future residents and space for recreational activities to improve public health.

Three neighborhood parks sites are provided, totaling 9.1 acres. A 5% private facilities credit of is also given for the HOA maintained central spine trail amenity that extends from 24 th Street on the west to proposed C Street, linking the West and Central neighborhoods to the Transit Village. Based on 1,163 proposed housing units, the parkland dedication is 9.55 acres, however with the 5% private facilities credit of 0.477 , the required park acreage is reduced to 9.0 73 acres. Park design shall comply with the City of Sacramento Department of Parks and Recreation Design Guidelines.

1.6 Procedures for Approval and Amendments

The procedures for approval of development under, as well as amendments to, these PUD guidelines are as set forth in Chapter

17.452 of Title 17 of the Sacramento City Code, and may be amended occasionally.

PUD GUIDELINES 6

Exhibit 3: Mobility Framewo

PUD GUIDELINES 7

SECTION 2: PLANNING STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

2. 1 Development Standards

With the exception of the Central Village, all development within the Plan Area will conform to existing City zoning and development standards.

1. West Village LDR R1-A (PUD) Single Unit/Duplex Dwelling Zone

2. North Village LDR R1-A (PUD) Single Unit/Duplex Dwelling Zone

3. Transit Village HDR R-4 (PUD) Multi Unit Zone

4. Transit Village CMU C-1 (PUD) Limited Commercial Zone

The Central Village, shown on Exhibit 4, includes three types of lots for detached and attached homes, including compact lots (MDR -1B), “I” Court lots (MDR -1A and MDR -2A) and Bungalow condominiums (MDR -2B). The underlying zone for the Central Village is R-2A (PUD), however the anticipated housing products will not conform to the minimum lot area, dimensions, driveway lengths and setback requirements of the R -2A zone and development standards. In order to provide the flexibility needed to addres s these innovative housing products, development standards for each of the three lot types are provided in Tables 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3.

PUD GUIDELINES 8

Exhibit 4: Central Village MDR Lot Types

PUD GUIDELINES 9

Table 2.1: Development Standards for
MDR-1B Compact Lots in the Central Village

LOT SIZE MINIMUMS CRITERIA
Lot size 2,380 square feet
Lot depth 70’
Lot width interior 34’
Lot width corner 46.5’
MINIMUM SETBACKS1,2,3 CRITERIA
Front
To Living Area
To Porch
To Garage

12’-6”
12’-6”
18’-0”
Rear 10’-0”
Side4
4’-0”
Zero lot line is 0’ and 4’
MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE 60%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35’-0”

Notes

1. All setbacks are measured from right of way or property line.

2. Archit ectural projections may project a maximum of 3 feet into required rear or side setback areas; however, in no case shall such projection be closer than 3 feet to any property line. An architectural projection is defined as an element that articulates the building elevation such as, media niches, library niches, bay windows, chimneys, balconies and other similar elements. The building may not project into the 12.5’ public utility easement along the right of way.

3. Wi ndow and door pop-out surrounds, pot shelves, enhanced window sills, shutter details, window trim , entry gates and projecting eaves shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC).

4. 0’ on one side and 4’ the other side to allow zero lot line product. Otherwise 4’ side yard on both sides.

PUD GUIDELINES 10

Table 2.2: Development Standards for
MDR-1A and MDR-2A “I” Courts in the Central Village

LOT SIZE MINIMUMS CRITERIA
Lot size 3,150 square feet
Lot depth 75’
Lot width interior 42’424242’
Lot width corner 54’
MINIMUM SETBACKS1,2,3 CRITERIA
Front
To Living Area
To Porch
To Garage

10’-0”
10’-0”
18’-0”
Rear 10’-0”
Side
4’-0”
MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE 50%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35’-0”
MAX. BUILDING EAVE HEIGHT4 30’-0”

Notes

1. All setbacks are measured from right of way or property line, except the front setbacks that are measured from the I court back of curb.

2. Archit ectural projections may project a maximum of 3 feet into required front, rear or side setback areas; however, in no case shall such projection be closer than 3 feet to any property line. An architectural projection is defined as an element that articulates the building elevation such as, media niches, library niches, bay windows, chimneys, balconies and other similar elements.

3. Wi ndow and door pop-out surrounds, pot shelves, enhanced window sills, shutter details, window trim , entry gates and projecting eaves shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC).

4. For fire access, building roof eave height to be 30’ max per California Fire Code (CFC).

PUD GUIDELINES 11

Table 2.3: Development Standards for
MDR-2B Bungalow Condominium Lots in the Central
Village

LOT SIZE MINIMUMS CRITERIA
Lot size 6,470 square feet5
Lot depth 84’
Lot width interior 77’77’
Lot width corner 80’
MINIMUM SETBACKS1,2,3 CRITERIA
Front (Greenway / Paseo Frontage)
To Living Area
To Porch

11’-0”
11’-0”
Rear (Alley) 4’-0” to garage
from edge of Alley-way
Side
4’-0”
MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE 65%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35’-0”
MAX. BUILDING EAVE HEIGHT4 30’-0”

Notes

1. All setbacks are measured from right of way or property line, except the rear setbacks that are measured from the alley top of curb.

2. Archit ectural projections may project a maximum of 3 feet into required front, rear or side setback areas; however, in no case shall such projection be closer than 3 feet to any property line. An architectural projection is defined as an element that articulates the building elevation such as, media niches, library niches, bay windows, chimneys, balconies and other similar elements.

3. Wi ndow and door pop-out surrounds, pot shelves, enhanced window sills, shutter details, window trim , entry gates and projecting eaves shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC).

4. For fire access, building roof eave height to be 30’ max per California Fire Code (CFC).

5. Each lot contain 3 residential dwelling units, which will be defined by a condominium map.

PUD GUIDELINES 12

2.2 Design Guidelines

Development within the Plan Area will follow the Citywide Design Guidelines, as applicable. The following Design Guidelines address specific aspects of the project design and shall supercede the Citywide Design Guidelines. Where these guidelines are silent, the Citywide Design Guidelines shall prevail.

A. Community Design

1. Circulation and mobility patterns should emphasize high degree of connectivity to allow vehicular, bike and pedestrian linkages with the adjacent Detroit Boulevard neighborhood and City Property to the north.

B. Neighborhood Design

1. Individual lots and homes shall not have garage driveways face onto A Street to avoid “back-up” conflicts with vehicular traffic.

2. All homes/residential units are encouraged to front onto residential streets, onto trails and open space, to the extent feasible.

3. The lots surrounding Lot P3 (in the northeast corner of the community) or in close proximity, shall be generally oriented to front on to the extension of Ann Arbor Way and the landscape amenity to provide “eyes-on-the-park”.

4. Houses adjacent to paseos should consider locating entrances along the pathways to increase natural surveillance.

C. Detached and Attached Residential Housing Design

1. The floor plans and elevations should be designed to ensure that garages not dominate the streetscape and will be subordinate to the main living area/designated outdoor living space.

2. To achieve diverse and varied streetscapes, garages or carports shall be setback from the front property line farther than or equal to the front façade of the building.

3. Floor plans should include covered front porches and other techniques to de-emphasize garage doors.

4. Encourage providing enhanced elevations and active, useable porches for housing units facing a public street, school, park, basins, trails or other public spaces.

PUD GUIDELINES 13

5. Encourage builders to design some lots to accommodate accessory dwelling units (ADU’s), where feasible.

6. Encourage builders to minimize the amount and footprint of vehicle parking, such as tandem garages and shared parking areas.

7. Home designs for the LDR-1 neighborhood shall include at least one single story floor plan.

D. Trails, Greenbelts and Paseos

1. The Greenbelts and Pedestrian paseos should be illuminated to a minimum of 1/3 foot candles per square foot area at a 6:1 average to minimum ratio.

2. The Greenbelts and Paseos shall be sited, landscaped and designed to avoid hiding places.

3. Houses adjacent to paseos should consider orienting front doors along the pathways and/or utilize “corner” home elevations to increase natural surveillance.

E. Perimeter Fencing and Signage

1. A Perimeter Fencing Plan has been developed to identify the appropriate fencing treatments to address a variety of conditions related to visibility, security, noise and maintenance. The Perimeter Fencing Plan, Exhibit 5, is provided on page 15.

2. Wayfinding and distance signage to the light rail station should be provided at the CMU parcel ( Lot C) and the HDR parcels (Lots D, E and F) and along M and E Streets.

F. Landscape Design

1. Enhanced landscaping should be provided at all street entrances along Cosumnes River Boulevard and 24th Street to provide a sense of arrival and community identity.

2. Incorporate trees to shade new and existing pavements to the full extent feasible, in addition to meeting the parking lot tree shading requirement.

3. Landscaping should consist of climate-appropriate plantings, including drought-tolerant and native species suited to Sacramento.

PUD GUIDELINES 14

G. Sustainability

1. Use of cool pavement and certified cool roofs is encouraged, where feasible. Use of cool pavement is particularly encouraged in the alleyways providing access to the “I” C ourt/6 pack homes in the northern portions of MDR 1 and MDR-2.

2. Home and building design and placement should take advantage of passive solar opportunities.

PUD GUIDELINES 15

Exhibit 5: Perimeter Fencing Schematic

RESOLUTION NO. 2023–
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023
AMENDING THE CITY’S BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE BIKEWAY

FACILITIES NETWORK IN THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (APNs: 053-0010-048, 053-0010-049,053-0010-076,119-0080-001,119-0080-051, AND 119-0090-016) (P21-042)

BACKGROUND
A. As stated in the 2035 General Plan in policy M 5.1.1, the City maintains and implements a Bicycle Master Plan that carries out the goals and pol icies of the General Plan.

B. On June 15, 2023, the City Active Transportation Commission held a public hearing on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development project and received and considered evidence, and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve amending the City Bicycle Master Plan as set forth in Exhibit A.

C. On October 10, 2023, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 and 17.812.030.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development, the City Council finds that amending the City Bicycle Master Plan to modify the bikeway network in Stone Beetland is consistent with the City’s general plan goal to maintain a safe, comprehensive, and integrated bicycle system and a set of support facilities throughout the city that encourage bicycling that is safe and accessible to all.

Section 2. City Council hereby amends the City’s Bicycle Master Plan to modify the Stone Beetland bicycle network as set forth in Exhibit A.

Section 3. Exhibit A is part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Bicycle Plan Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ARBORALBION WAY

BURLINGTON WAY

DETROIT BLVD

DEERHAVEN WAY

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD
FUTURE 24TH STREET
ANN
FUTURE 24TH STREET

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

BLUE LINE

BLUE LINE

MESA GRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

MORRISON CREEK
WAY

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOODDELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

DETROIT / SOUTHGATENEIGHBORHOOD

WESTVILLAGECENTRALVILLAGETRANSITVILLAGE

NORTHVILLAGE

CITY OF SACRAMENTO SITE

SRCSDBUFFER AREA

PARK &DRAINAGEPARKSTATION

TRANSIT

TRANSIT

CORRIDOR

CORRIDOR
PARK

SEE CONCEPTUAL RT STATIONCONNECTION DETAILRT

OPEN SPACE& DRAINAGE
P-1P-2
P-3

MORRISON CREEK

RT STATIONPLATFORM
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_MOBILITY FRAMEWORK.DWG
CITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1" = 200' DATE: MAY 26, 2023 6004002000 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456Mayer Consulting Inc.Planning + DesignPO Box 2042Davis, CA 95617

STONE BEETLANDMOBILITY FRAMEWORK
LEGEND:16' MULTIUSE TRAIL (CLASS 1)(12' PAVED W/ 2' DG BOTH SIDES) 5' SIDEWALKBIKE LANE (CLASS 2)

RT STATIONCONNECTION DETAIL
10' WIDENED SIDEWALKBASIN MAINTENANCE ROADPATHWAY CONNECTIONS THROUGH PARKS

EXISTING BUS PULLOUTSPROPOSED BUS PULLOUTS

PATHWAY CONNECTION

PUBLIC PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
NOTE:THE ALIGNMENTS OF THETRAILS AND PATHWAYSARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY.

RESOLUTION NO. 2023–
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023

RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS FOR THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (APNS 053-0010-048, 053-0010- 049,053-0010-076,119-0080-001,119-0080-051, AND 119-0090-016) (P21-042)

BACKGROUND
A. On July 27, 2023, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development project and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to adopt findings of fact and approve the project entitlements for the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development.

B. On October 10, 2023, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 and

17.812.030.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (P21-042), the City Council approves the project entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

Section 2. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearings on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development (P21-042), the City Council approves the Tentative Subdivision Map and street sections with design deviation to eliminate northern parking lane and sidewalk on Street A, 42’ right-of-way without landscape parkways on H Street and Albion Way, modified intersection spacing in MDR-1, residential street right-of- way without landscape parkways on LDR-2 and LDR-3, exceeding maximum cul-de-sac length within LDR-2, and modified intersection angle for D and E Street as identified on Exhibit A and B, subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

Section 3. 200-Year Flood Protection: The project site is within an area for which the local flood-management agency has made adequate progress (as defined in California Government Code section 65007) on 2 the construction of a flood-protection system that, for the area intended to be protected by the system, will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban areas for property located within a flood-hazard zone, as demonstrated by the SAFCA Urban Level of Flood Protection Plan and Adequate Progress Baseline Report and the SAFCA Adequate Progress Toward an Urban Level of Flood Protection Engineer’s Report, each accepted by the City Council on June 21, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016-0226), and the SAFCA 2022 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by the City Council on October 11, 2022 (Resolution No. 2022-0313).

Section 4. No Net Loss Finding (Gov. Code, § 65863). This project is located on a site listed in the 2021-2029 RHNA Housing Element Sites Inventory. This project proposes 198 units of lower-income housing. The site inventory assumes zero units of lower-income housing units. Thus, the project exceeds the assumed capacity in the Housing Element sites inventory.

A. The Tentative Subdivision Map subdivide 140.7± gross acres into 452 lots, with design deviations to street cross-sections, intersection spacing, and cul-de-sac length is approved based on the following findings of fact:

1. None of the conditions described in City Code section 17.828.090 and Government Code section 66474 exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows:
a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code;
b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code as conditioned;
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development; d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely 3 to cause serious public health problems;
g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code (Gov. Code §66473.5);

3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. Code §66474.6);

4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code §66473.1); and

5. The City has considered the effect of the approval of this Tentative Subdivision Map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code §66412.3).

Tentative Map Design Deviations

1. The property to be divided is of such size or shape, or is affected by such topographic conditions, or that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that it is impossible, impractical, or undesirable in the particular case to conform to the strict application of these regulations;

2. The cost to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance with the regulation is not the sole reason for granting the deviation;

3. The deviation will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity; and

4. That granting the deviation is in accord with the intent and purposes of these regulations and is consistent with the general plan and with all other applicable specific plans of the city.
4 B. The Site Plan and Design Review of the Tentative Subdivision Map is approved based on the following findings of fact:

1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the proposed general plan designations of Traditional Neighborhood Medium Density, Park and Recreation, Public Quasi Public, Urban Neighborhood Medium Density, and Traditional Center, in that the proposed design of the subdivision will prioritize connections to the Morrison Creek Light Rail station and public parks through a network of public and private trails and public street networks intended to promote walking, biking, and alternative modes of transportation. The proposed lot layout efficiently utilizes vacant urban infill site with an array of housing types available to various income levels. The project has been carefully designed to implement criteria to meet the guidelines of a Transit Priority Project by increasing residential density near public transportation.

2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards, in that the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development design guidelines list criteria intended to create a cohesive neighborhood design. The layout of the subdivision has been evaluated related to circulation patterns, lot orientation, and the relationship with the surrounding community. The project will construct infrastructure that will connect and expand public and private open spaces, road networks, and a lotting pattern intended to create homes that engage public spaces.

Additionally, each lot has adequate access to the public right-of-way via a series of public and private driveways.

3. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards, in that the street network has been reviewed by the Traffic Engineering Division of Public Works and determined adequate to provide safe public access.

4. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, in that the proposed layout accounts for safe and efficient vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation while providing natural surveillance on public and private open spaces. The project completes a roadway connection from the existing Detroit Neighborhood to Cosumnes River Boulevard, to the Morrison Creek Light Station, new parks, and the nearby bicycle network. 5 5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development ensure energy consumption is minimized and use of renewable energy sources is encouraged, in that all new construction must meet Title 24 requirements for sustainability and green building. In addition, the project has been carefully designed to meet Transit Priority Project guidelines which emphasize density near public transportation; and

6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance, in that the proposed layout provides for safe and efficient vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation while providing natural surveillance on public and private open spaces.

C. The Tree Permit for the removal of six private protected trees, is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. The location of the six private protected trees conflicts with the construction of necessary infrastructure, including the construction of drainage facilities, and a proposed park.

2. The applicant has agreed to meet the tree replacement requirement with the standards set forth in section 12.56.060 of the Tree Planting, Maintenance and Conservation Ordinance and according to the following conditions.

A. The Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 140.7± gross acres into 452 lots, with design deviations to street cross-sections, intersection spacing, and cul-de- sac length is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:

Planning Division
A1. Mixed Income Ordinance Exemption: The applicant is required to produce a minimum of 198 units as “affordable dwelling units,” as defined in the Planning and Development Code section 17.712.020, to qualify for an exemption under Section 17.712.040(B). All affordable dwelling units must have a Regulatory Agreement between the applicant and the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) recorded on title, requiring the units to remain affordable for no less than thirty (30) years. A Regulatory Agreement shall be recorded on title prior to the first final map being recorded. The Regulatory Agreement shall include the following provisions:
6 a. Require that the design of all the affordable dwelling units be compatible with the rest of the Project in appearance, materials, and finished quality; b. Require that the affordable dwelling units include a mix of bedrooms to accommodate households of different sizes;
c. Require that the affordable dwelling units comply with federal and state laws on accessibility, as well as all local laws;
d. Establish the location of the affordable dwelling units; and e. Establish the timing of construction such that a building permit must be issued for the construction of 198 affordable dwelling units prior to the issuance of not more than 272 units within the Transit Village area, as identified on page 1 of the Stone Beetland PUD Guidelines.

Finance Department
A2. The applicant shall participate in the Updated Delta Shores Finance Plan, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2019-0378 on September 24, 2019, and as updated, and pay all required fees and shall execute any and all agreements which may be required, in order to implement this condition.

Department of Public Works
A3. The applicant shall coordinate with the adjacent property owners to obtain any needed right of way for the construction of the 24th Street extension and A Street intersection as shown on the approved Tentative Subdivision Map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A4. Comply with requirements included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan developed by, and kept on file in, the Planning Division Office (P21-042).

A5. Meet all conditions of the existing PUD (P21-042) unless the condition is superseded by a Tentative Map condition.

A6. Show all continuing and proposed/required easements on the Final Map.

A7. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.500.190, indicate easements on the Final Map to allow for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The specific locations for such easements shall be subject to review and approval of the Department of Public Works after consultation with the U.S. Postal Service. 7 A8. Private reciprocal ingress, egress, and maneuvering easements will be required for future development within the boundary of this Tentative Map. When required, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Conveyance of Easements with the City stating that a private reciprocal ingress/egress, and maneuvering easement shall be conveyed to and reserved from all appropriate parcels, at no cost, at the time of sale or other conveyance of any of the parcels.

A9. The applicant shall participate in the Updated Delta Shores Finance Plan, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2019-0378 on September 24, 2019, and as updated, and pay all required fees and shall execute any and all agreements which may be required, in order to implement this condition.

A10. Obtain and comply with abandonment clearance letters for all proposed abandonments on the Final Map. Letters shall be provided to the Department of Public Works.

A11. Multiple Final Maps may be recorded. Prior to recordation of any Final Map all infrastructure/improvements necessary to serve the development proposed for the respective Final Map must be in place or secured under a City approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement to the satisfaction of the Departments of Utilities, Public Works and Community Development Departments. Necessary public improvements and infrastructure shall be determined by the City, but at a minimum, will include street improvements contiguous to the phased Final Map and shall be dedicated and constructed and connected to the nearest existing street(s) prior to recording of that phased Final Map.

A12. The City shall determine public infrastructure improvements required prior to recordation of each Final Map or phased Final Subdivision Map. Any public improvement not specifically noted in these conditions or on the Tentative Subdivision Map shall be designed and constructed to City standards in effect at the time of filing the final map application.

A13. With each Final Map or phased Final Map, dedicate an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) to the City those areas identified on the Tentative Subdivision Map as Open Space lots. The applicant shall fund an endowment or create or annex the project area to the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District, or other financing mechanism acceptable to the City, prior to recordation of the Final Map or phased Final Map for the purpose of landscape maintenance of all dedicated lots. Design and construct landscaping, irrigation and masonry walls in dedicated easements or rights of way, to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works (DPW).  Acceptance of any required landscaping, irrigation and walls by the City into a Landscape Maintenance District shall be coordinated with 8 the Department of Finance (Public Improvement Financing) and DPW.  The Developer (or Project HOA) shall maintain the landscaping, irrigation and walls for two years or until acceptance by the City into the District (whichever is less), unless otherwise agreed to by the City. The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the landscaping, irrigation and walls or fences.

A14. Submit a Geotechnical Analysis prepared by a registered engineer to be used in street design. The analysis shall identify and recommend solutions for groundwater related problems, which may occur within both the subdivision lots and public right-of-way. Construct appropriate facilities to alleviate those problems. As a result of the analysis street sections shall be designed to provide for stabilized subgrades and pavement sections under high groundwater conditions.

A15. Construct standard subdivision improvements as noted in these conditions pursuant to section 17.504.050 of the City Code. All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. This shall include the repair or replacement/reconstruction of any existing deteriorated curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the subject property per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A16. Multiple access points will be required for all phases of the Final Map to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Dead end streets must be less than 500' in length and must include a turn-around approved by the Department of Public Works and Fire Department.

A17. At its discretion, the City may require the inclusion of traffic calming devices along residential streets, to be constructed as part of the public improvements.

These devices may include, but are not limited to, chicanes, undulations, additional 4-way intersections, etc. Undulations will be required on certain streets adjacent to school/park combinations, as determined by the Department of Public Works.

A18. Dedicate Irrevocable Offer of Dedications (IODs) and construct all proposed off- street bikeways as shown on the approved tentative subdivision map and mobility framework exhibits. The I.O.D.'s for off-street bike trails shall be a minimum of 16 feet wide (12-foot asphalt bike lane plus two 2-foot decomposed granite shoulders on either side) The Construction of all off-street bike trails shall include associated improvements at street crossings, signage and markings per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 9 A19. Dedicate right-of-way in the form of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) and construct all proposed Streets per City standards and specifications for street construction and per the approved Tentative Subdivision Map street cross section to the satisfaction of Department of Public Works.

A20. Construct bulb-outs at locations specified in the City’s Pedestrian Friendly Street Design Guidelines, the City’s Design and Procedures Manual, or as directed by the Department of Public Works.

A21. Construct A.D.A. compliant ramps per City standards at all intersections and as directed by the Department of Public Works. All crosswalks shall be disability access compliant to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A22. All proposed elbows and cul-de-sacs shall be designed per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A23. The applicant is required to install permanent street signs to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

A24. City standard ornamental streetlights (acorn style or alternate decorative style approved by the Planning and Electrical Divisions) shall be designed and constructed by the applicant in accordance with the Department of Public Works, Electrical Division requirements. The number and locations of these lights will be determined when development plans are submitted for review.

A25. All right-of-way and street improvement transitions that result from changing the right-of-way of any street shall be located, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The center lines of such streets shall be aligned.

A26. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A27. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle). Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters. Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited 3.5' in height. The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works. 10 A28. Construct new or modify existing traffic signals at the following intersections when required by the Department of Public Works (if not already in place):
 Cosumnes River Boulevard (CRB) and C Street intersection  Cosumnes River Boulevard and 24th Street intersection  C Street and E Street intersection
NOTE: The Department of Public Works shall determine the need for signals, based on CalTrans signal warrants and known pending development projects prior to the Issuance of any building permit. Signals shall be constructed as part of the public improvements for the Final Map. Signal design and construction shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The applicant shall provide all on-site easements and right-of-way needed for turn lanes, signal facilities and related appurtenances. The applicant shall install CCTV cameras and all necessary appurtenances if deemed necessary by and to the satisfaction of Transportation Division (Signal Operations Section).

A29. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSCDR) per section 15.10 of the City’s Design and Procedures Manual to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to the submittal of any improvement plans involving traffic signal work. The TSCDR provides crucial geometric information for signal design which may lead to additional right-of-way dedication and should be started as early as possible to avoid delays during the plan check process.

A30. The traffic signals shall be connected to the City of Sacramento Traffic Operation Center and traffic surveillance equipment shall be provided per City requirements. The signal communication infrastructure shall be capable of both fiber and/ or copper communication medium consistent with the communications infrastructure used for the site. Closed Circuit Television Cameras (CCTV) shall be installed. Other equipment may be required subject to requirement per Department of Public Works.

A31. The applicant shall pay a fair share contribution for the future planned signal at 24th Street and A Street. The fair share contribution shall be 25% of the total cost for design and construction (including all needed equipment and appurtenances) of the signal at that intersection to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The fair share payment shall be required with the construction of A Street or the 24th street extension to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
11 A32. The applicant shall comply with and construct all the recommendations listed in the traffic operational analysis prepared for the project and dated Dec 9, 2022, to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. With each phased final map, the City will determine when each improvement is required to be constructed.

These improvements include the following:

At the intersection of CRB and 24th Street.
 The applicant shall lengthen the westbound right turn lane from 140 to 250 feet.
 Restripe the ultimate southbound lanes to one right turn lane, two through lanes and one left turn lane.
 Restripe the north bound lanes to include two through lanes.

At the intersection of B Street and CRB
 The applicant shall modify the existing striping and construct a median along CRB to prevent left out movement from Street B but allow a right in/out and a left in movements only.
 Provide stop control on Street B
At the intersection of C Street and CRB
 The applicant shall lengthen the eastbound left turn lane from 210 to 300 feet.
 Lengthen the westbound right turn lane from 140 to 250-feet and install an overlap phase.
 Stripe the southbound lanes to include one left turn lane and one left/right turn lane.

At the intersection of E Street and C Street.
 The applicant shall install a full traffic signal. All approaches at the signalized intersection shall include a left turn lane and a through-right lane.

At the intersection of Detroit Boulevard and F Street extension 12  Install high visibility triple four yellow crosswalk with appropriate advanced signage and pavement markings.

At the intersection Meadowview Road and Detroit Boulevard  The applicant shall lengthen the westbound left-turn lane from 175 feet to 225 feet to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A33. The applicant shall construct a 2-foot median at the intersection of I Street & B Street to prohibit left-in/left-out vehicular movements to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A34. The applicant shall coordinate with Regional Transit to modify the existing light rail station entry at the intersection of D Street and E Street. The modifications to the entry will include, but not limited to, shifting the existing driveway north, restriping on-site circulation to one way, removal of an existing striped crosswalk, providing signage and stop control, etc. to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A35. The applicant shall make provisions for bus stops, shelters, transit centers, etc. in consultation with Regional Transit and to the satisfaction of the Department of public Works.

A36. The applicant shall dedicate additional right of way and construct bus turn-outs for all bus stops adjacent to the subject site per City standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

Tentative Map Design Deviations:

A37. The Small Lot Tentative Map allows for six subdivision modifications (deviations) and are as follows:
 A Street – Modified collector street section with no parking and sidewalk on one side.
 H Street & Albion Way – Modified residential street section with 42-ft right- of-way and no landscape planter.
 MDR 1 – Residential intersection spacing less than 120-ft at B Street between M Street & N Street.
 LDR 2 & LDR 3 – Modified residential street section without landscape planters.
13  LDR 2 – maximum length of a cul-de-sac to exceed 500-ft.  D Street & E Street intersection – Intersection angle not meeting 90- degrees.

Department of Public Works: Private Streets
A38. Design private streets and private drives to meet the City standards regarding structural section. Private streets shall be inspected to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A39. Provide a standard driveway at the entrance to the private streets.

SMUD
A40. SMUD has existing overhead 12kV facilities on west of 24th street, north of A street and within the PROJECT SITE that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A41. SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities within the PROJECT SITE that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A42. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

A43. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

A44. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.
14 A45. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

A46. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

A47. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design-and- Construction-Services.

A48. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

A49. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways.

A50. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads.

A51. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

A52. The Applicant shall dedicate a (20 or 25)-foot easement for future 69 kV routes that will be required to connect the new substation into SMUD’s Distribution System. SMUD has proposed two overhead 69 kV routes along Consumes River Blvd (green highlighted color), and northeast of the project along transit corridor (blue highlighted color).

SMUD has proposed another future 69kV route which can be selected as described below:
15  Alternative one: Proposed overhead 69kV route from south of Burlington Way to west of A street then run to south along the west side of future 24th St (burgundy and pink highlighted colors).
 Alternative two: Proposed overhead 69kV route from south of Burlington Way to east then south of the C street (the purple highlighted color).

A 12.5-foot Public Utility Easement (PUE) is also required along these streets, the 12.5-foot PUE will be located directly adjacent to the street right-of-way, with the 20-foot 69 kV easement directly adjacent to or overlapping with the PUE for the future double 12kV underground circuits.

A53. The Applicant shall identify SMUD's transmission line easement as a "Restricted Building and Use Area" on the subject map.

A54. SMUD occupies a transmission line easement within the boundaries of the subject map and certain uses are not permitted or compatible with the safety, operation, maintenance and construction of our transmission line facilities. If the Applicant proposes any use within the transmission line easement, the Applicant shall route its plans to SMUD for review. For more information regarding transmission encroachment, please visit: https://www.smud.org/en/Corporate/Do- Business-with-SMUD/Land-Use/Transmission-Right-of-Way.

A55. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant or its designee shall obtain a joint-use agreement from SMUD consenting to proposed development within SMUD's transmission line easement. Please contact SMUD's Property Administrator for application procedures.

Regional San
A56. Pursuant to Regional San’s easement rights for the 66-inch Sacramento Force Main and 16-inch SPA Recycled Water Line:

A57. Any improvement or proposed use, including landscaping, that restricts Regional San access to its existing easements for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, and repairing its facilities will not be permitted.

A58. Permanent structures, walls, signs and footings will not be permitted within the existing Regional San easement area.

A59. Construction staging and stockpiling within the existing Regional San easement area will not be permitted. A note to this effect is to be placed on any plans issued for construction activities.
16 A60. Deep rooted trees, trees with mature growth of more than five feet, oak trees, and other environmentally protected species will not be permitted within Regional San’s existing easement area.

A61. Any proposed tree plantings and landscaping shall be placed in a manner as such that mature roots will not infiltrate manholes or other Regional San Structures. A geotextile fabric root protection barrier system may be required.

A62. Project shall install purple piping and associated irrigation appurtenances (including but not limited to valve boxes, sprinkler heads, flow meters, etc.) for all open-space and landscaping corridors. The purple pipe shall be installed in-lieu of regular irrigation piping and related appurtenances for the future distribution and delivery of Title 22 recycled water to the project site. If recycled water service is not available at the time of the onsite development, the onsite purple pipe irrigation system should be charged with another water supply, such as potable water. Once recycled water becomes available, the onsite irrigation system shall be disconnected from the potable water system via an airgap and connected to the recycled water distribution system. Regional San and the City of Sacramento are currently in the process of establishing a timeline for when the recycled water will be available to the project site.

A63. Conveyance of property rights by Regional San within the entitlement area is subject to approval by its Board of Directors and would only proceed in accordance with Regional San guidelines pertaining to the disposal of real property interests.

A64. To deter trespass from properties to be developed onto Regional San property, the applicant will be required to fence all property that directly abut Regional San parcels. The applicant will be required to install signs along the Regional San property boundary at 300-foot intervals and at all points of entry that state the following:
 SACRAMENTO REGIONAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT – NO
TRESSPASSING. VIOLATORS SUBJECT TO SECTION CALIFORNIA
PENAL CODE.

A65. An approved Permit to Enter (PTE) will be required to access or construct upon Regional San property.

A66. An approved Access Permit will be required to be obtained from Regional San for any access to Regional San facilities. A note to this effect is to be placed on any plans issued for construction activities.
17 A67. Improvements shall not be installed in such manner that will impede vehicular access by Regional San for maintenance purposes.

A68. The applicant shall provide Regional San with continuous, unimpeded access to its facilities at all times.

A69. Any proposed utility crossings of a Regional San interceptor shall be a maximum of 45-degrees from the line that is perpendicular to the centerline of the interceptor.

A70. Any proposed utility crossing of the Regional San interceptor shall have a minimum vertical clearance of five (5) feet.

A71. Parallel utilities (water, drain, electrical, etc.) will not be permitted within the existing Regional San easement area.

A72. Sewer connections will not be permitted to connect directly to the Regional San interceptor system.

A73. The applicant shall submit for Regional San review and approval all landscaping, utility, and improvement plans that directly affect Regional San easements and facilities.

A74. Developing this property will require the payment of Regional San sewer impact fees (connection fees). Regional San sewer impact fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. For questions pertaining to Regional San sewer impact fees, please contact the Permit Services Unit at (916) 876-6100 or by email at [email protected].

Department of Utilities
A75. All existing easements and all existing right-of-ways shall be shown on the Final Map, except for all abandoned easements and right-of-ways.

A76. Dedicate all necessary easements, IOD easements right-of-way, fee title property, or IOD in fee title property on the parcel map as required to implement the approved sewer, drainage, and water studies.

A77. A financing mechanism approved in writing by the City must be formed for the purpose of constructing all common drainage facilities within the project area and any additional facilities required to accommodate development of the subject area in accordance with the approved master plan for the project area. For this purpose, "financing mechanism" includes but is not limited to a fully executed 18 agreement approved as to form by the City Attorney, which provides for funding and construction of the said facilities, and which provides for posting or depositing with the City of unconditional security for performance of the landowner's obligations, which security is adequate in the sole and exclusive discretion of the City, and which is in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

A78. The applicant and/or any successor shall fully participate in any financing mechanism, including but not limited to assessment districts, or community facilities districts formed for the purpose of financing the facilities specified above. For this purpose, "fully participate" requires that the applicant and/or successor shall, notwithstanding the provisions of Articles XIIIC and/or XIIID of the California Constitution, or any other applicable federal or state law, rule of regulation, waive and relinquish any right to protest or vote against the formation of the mechanism and/or the levy of any assessment or tax pursuant thereto; actively participate in a positive manner in the proceedings for formation of the mechanism and/or the levy of any assessment or tax pursuant thereto; and pay all taxes, assessments and/or fees levied pursuant thereto.

A79. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water master plan for review and approval by the Department of Utilities (DOU). The water distribution system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Water Planning Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements.

A80. Common area landscaping shall have a separate street tap for a metered irrigation service.

A81. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-way’s as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual.

A82. Prior to the construction of Future 24th Street, the applicant shall relocate the existing sump 53 pump station to the satisfaction of the DOU. The Sump 53 19 shall be constructed and fully functional to the satisfaction of the DOU prior to connection to the City’s public sewer system. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, land dedication (if applicable) and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies, and private landowners for the construction of these facilities (Note: It is recommended that the applicant coordinate with the Delta Shores development on the relocation and construction of Sump 53).

A83. Provide separate sanitary sewer services to each parcel to the satisfaction of the DOU.

A84. A feasibility sewer study as described in Section 9 of the City Design and Procedures Manual will be required. This study and shed map shall be approved by the DOU. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Sewer Planning Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any sewer related requirements.

A85. Prior to the submittal of the improvement plan application, the applicant shall prepare a Drainage Master Plan meeting the criteria specified in the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. The drainage study shall be consistent with the existing Basin 89 Drainage Masterplan for the project area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval (Note: A maintenance agreement may be required for detention and Low Impact Development (LID) features).

A86. Construct new water, sewer, and drainage facilities per the approved water, sewer, and drainage studies within the proposed public streets to the satisfaction of the DOU. The public mains shall be located within the asphalt section of the public right-of-way (except for Lot M, Lot N, Lot U, Lot X, and Lot OS-8 as approved by the DOU). (Note: Public mains are not permitted to be located within median areas. The proposed public drainage main within C Street is located within a landscaped median. These mains will be required to be located outside of the median area, or as approved by the DOU).

A87. Prior to the initiation of any water, sewer or storm drainage services to the project, a homeowner association (HOA), or a privately funded maintenance district shall be formed and C.C. & R’s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water, sewer and storm drainage facilities within the private drives, roads, alleys, and/or landscaped areas. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The C.C.&R’s must provide 20 that the City-approved provisions regarding water, sewer and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities.

The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

A88. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is higher or as approved by the DOU.

A89. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

A90. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

A91. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

A92. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings. These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.

A93. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area not served by an existing regional water quality control facility and/or the project has more than twenty acres of new or modified impervious area, therefore, Low Impact 21 Development (LID), certified full capture trash control devices and on-site treatment control measures will be required. The on-site storm water treatment control measures required may affect site design and site configuration and should be considered during early planning stages. The applicant shall provide a stormwater quality management plan to the satisfaction of the DOU.

A94. A maintenance agreement may be required for all on-site treatment control measures and on-site full capture trash control systems. Contact DOU for a list of accepted proprietary devices if considered for treatment control and full capture trash control. Construction drawings must include all proposed source controls, on-site water quality measures, and on-site full capture trash control features and devices selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” for appropriate measures.

A95. Execute and deliver to the City, in recordable form, an IOD in fee title to Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5 for a water quality and flood control basin(s) or as acceptable by the DOU. If the exact location and dimensions differ from those specified for Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5 on the final map, the location and dimensions shall be revised in accordance to the DOU determinations. The Detention/Water Quality Basins shall be sized to accommodate the detention volume per the approved drainage study, service roads, ramps, drainage structures and all appurtenances.

If Lot B/OS-5 is placed outside the project boundary additional language or a separate agreement will be required addressing land dedication, funding, access, and maintenance. All agreements shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

A96. Prior to vertical construction, the applicant shall construct the detention/water quality basins and the inlet and outlet structures and its appurtenances per the approved Drainage Master Plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The applicant shall submit a separate set of improvement plans for the detention and water quality basins. Prior to design, the applicant shall meet with the Drainage CIP and Water Quality Section within DOU to discuss the design standards. The detention and water quality basins and the inlet and outlet structures may be phased to the satisfaction of DOU. (Note: At a minimum the following shall be provided: A post and cable fence shall be constructed around the basins on Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5. The DOU standard for a maintenance road consists of a 12-ft wide asphalt or crush rock with a 2-ft shoulder on each side and a surface rated for H-20 loading. Any improvements above and beyond (i.e., concrete, special pavers, etc.) the DOU standard will be required to be maintained by the HOA. Driveways off public roads providing access to the basins shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the DOU. Proper vehicle and personnel access 22 will be required to any manholes, inlets, outlets, and/or junction structures located within the wet basin area(s).)
A97. The proposed basin plans include features that are above and beyond the City’s standard maintenance obligations and therefore, the applicant shall annex Basin 1 and Basin 2 into an approved City maintenance district. The developer shall maintain the detention/water quality basins for a period of two (2) years or until acceptance by the City into a City approved maintenance district, whichever is less. The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the detention/water quality basin. Prior to the City acceptance, the developer shall rectify all defective items, including the removal of any sediment or debris that has accumulated to the satisfaction of the DOU. If required by the DOU, a maintenance agreement shall be executed.

A98. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies for the construction of this project.

A99. The applicant is required to review and update the “Delta Shores Morrison Creek Flooding Analysis” by Wood Rodgers; a study provided by SAFCA that analyzed 200-year flood protection. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development does not create any new areas of 200-year flooding (including areas outside of the project) with depths greater than 3-feet per the requirements dictated by DWR Urban level of Protection (ULOP) criteria.

A100. The proposed development is located adjacent to a Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) easement. The applicant shall comply with all SAFCA requirements and pay all required fees.

Fire Department
A101. The furthest projection of the exterior wall of a building shall be accessible from within 150 ft of an approved Fire Department access road (minimum 20’ wide) and approved water supply as measured by an unobstructed route around the exterior of the building. (California Fire Code Sections 503.1.1, 507.5.1) A102. All turning radii for fire access shall be designed as 35’ inside and 55’ outside.

California Fire Code Section 503.2.4.

A103. Provide the required fire the required fire hydrants in accordance with California Fire Code Section 507 and Appendix C, Section C102.1 as amended the Sacramento City Code Section 507.5.1.
23 A104. If fire service mains cross property lines, a reciprocal easement agreement shall be provided.

A105. A reciprocal ingress egress agreement shall be provided for review by City Attorney for any shared interior driveways being used for Fire Department access.

A106. Maintenance agreements shall be provided for the interior roadways and for the fire protection systems of any future proposed development. The agreement shall be record with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction and shall provide for the following:
a. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface.
b. Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) and/or width of twenty feet (20’).
c. Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or striping.
d. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems.
e. Unrestricted use of and access to the roadways covered by the agreements.
f. Provisions for the control of vehicle parking in prohibited areas and a mechanism for the removal of vehicles illegally parked. g. Maintenance and timely repair of all fire protection systems, including but not limited to hydrants, fire alarm systems and fire sprinklers.

Park Planning and Development Services
A107. Park Dedication – IOD: Pursuant to Sacramento City Code Chapter 17.512 (Parkland Dedication) the applicant shall provide on City’s form an irrevocable offer of dedication (IOD) of the parks sites identified on the tentative map as Lots P-1, P-2, P-3. Gross acreage totals 9.09 acres. At the time of delivery of the IOD, the applicant shall enter into an Agreement with the City to (1) provide to City a title report demonstrating that it holds full and clear title to Lots P-1, P-2, P- 3, including all interests necessary for maintenance and access; (2) provide a 24 Phase 1 environmental site assessment of Lots P-1, P-2, P-3; (3) if the environmental site assessment identifies any physical conditions or defects in Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 which would interfere with its intended use as a park, as determined by the City’s Park Planning and Development Services Division (PPDS) in its sole discretion, applicant shall complete a supplemental assessment and remedy any such physical condition or defect, to the satisfaction of PPDS; (4) take all actions necessary to ensure that Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 are free and clear of any wetland mitigation, endangered or threatened animal or plant species, sensitive habitat, tree removal or protection requirements, or other development restrictions. The applicant shall be solely responsible, and at its sole cost, for any required mitigation costs or measures associated with Lots P-1, P-2, P-3; and 5) The Park Lots shall be clear of any construction related debris or stockpiling.

A108. Basis for Park Land Dedication: Total park land dedication requirement for Stone Beetland is +9.56 acres based upon the zone’s maximum housing unit count of 452 single-family dwelling units and 711 multi-family dwelling units.

Parkland acreage dedication is determined according to the formula D x F = A, where D = the number of dwelling units, F = a ‘factor’ that when multiplied by the number of units will produce 3.5 acres per thousand population (for single-family detached units the factor is 0.0095, and A = the buildable acres to be dedicated.) Because parkland dedication requirements are based on unit type and count, the number of acres of parkland dedicated with the Tentative Subdivision Map establishes a limit on the number and type of units that may be approved without additional parkland dedication or in-lieu fee obligations under Sacramento City Code Chapter 17.512. Any changes in the unit type and count will affect the number of acres of parkland dedication requirement for subsequent maps.

Tentative Map park lots (P1, P-2, and P-3) gross acreage totals 9 acres. The remaining Quimby parkland dedication of 0.47 should be resolved with either the payment of Quimby in-Lieu fees, or a reduction of parkland through credit for eligible private recreation facilities, to be confirmed at the time of final map.

A109. Park Land Dedication Security: Each phased tentative subdivision map subsequent to the Tentative Subdivision Map may or may not be able to completely satisfy its Quimby land dedication requirements as a stand alone map, but the intent is to balance the land dedication overall. Should any phased map subsequent to the Tentative Subdivision Map contain less park land than is required to meet its Quimby parkland dedication requirement, including the accumulated totals for both residential units and parkland for all preceding final maps, the Applicant shall provide the City with a Letter of Credit or other authorized security in a form approved by the City Attorney and in an amount 25 equal in value to the balance of parkland due to secure the dedication of parkland for the Final Map. The Letter of Credit shall be released by the City upon acceptance of the IOD for the balance of the parkland dedication due. The dedication of excess parkland does not obligate the City to reimburse the Applicant for the value of the land dedicated. Excess dedication is at the option of the Applicant.

A110. Payment of In-Lieu Park Fee: Pursuant to City Code Chapter 17.512 (Parkland Dedication) the applicant shall pay to the city an in-lieu fee in the amount determined under SCC §§17.512.30 and 17.512.40 equal to the value of land that is not satisfied by dedication or met by the provision of approved private recreational facilities.

A111. Private Recreation Facility Credits: City Code Chapter 17.512, Sections

17.512.90 through 100 address granting of private recreation facility credits. The city may grant credits for privately owned and maintained open space or local recreation facilities, or both, in planned developments as defined in Section 11003 of the Business and Professions Code, condominiums as defined in Section 783 of the Civil Code, and other common interest developments. Such credit, if granted in acres, or comparable in lieu fees, shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the dedication or fees, or both, otherwise required under this chapter and no more than five percent per category of open space or recreational facilities described in this Chapter under 17.512.90. This project is eligible for Private Recreation Facilities Credits (PRFC) to offset the parkland dedication acreage requirement. The project is eligible for up to 25% PRFC, 5% for each eligible amenity. A full list of eligible amenities is listed in City Code section

17.512.90 through 100. The City agrees to a 5% (0.48 acre) private recreation facility credit for the Central Spine Trail, i.e.. Lot C, D, E and F on the Tentative Subdivision Map. The result shall be a reduction of the Project’s Parkland Dedication obligation from 9.56 acres to 9.082 acres. Should the Applicant request City consideration of private recreational facilities, a separate agreement must be approved by the City Council prior to recordation of the subdivision map for the project.

A112. Improvements: The Applicant shall construct the following public improvements within Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 :
a. Full street improvements for Lots P-1, P-2, P-3, along the north, south, eastern and western boundaries of Park Lots, including but not limited to curbs, gutters, accessible ramps, street paving, streetlights, and sidewalks; and improved surface drainage through the site.
26 b. A concrete sidewalk and vertical curb along all street frontages that open onto Park Lots P-1, P-2. The sidewalk shall be separated 6’6” from the curb, otherwise approved by PPDS. The concrete sidewalk shall be contiguous to the vertical curb on the street frontage that opens to Park Lot P-3. c. A post and cable fence, as approved by the City PPDS, on Park Lot P-1, separating Basin 1 from park space, on the east side of Park Lot P-3, on the east side of the class 1 bike trail on Open Space Lots OS-7, Lot Z, and Lot B/OS-5; a chain link fence on the north side of the Open Space Lots OS-1; and, a new enhanced wood fence on Open Space Lot OS-8 and Park Lot P-3 d. A twelve-inch (12") storm drain stub and six inch (6") sanitary sewer stub to the back of the sidewalk to serve Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 at a location approved by PPDS for future service. Number of stubs and locations to be approved by PPDS. Storm Drain and Sewer stubs are to be marked with a 3' high, white 4" x 4" post indicating stub or service location. e. One water tap for irrigation, one water tap for domestic water, and electrical and telephone service to Lots P-1, P-2, P-3, size, quantity, and location as approved by PPDS. Water taps and telephone and electrical services shall be marked with a 3' high, white 4" x 4" post indicating stub or service location. f. A ten-foot (10') wide driveway into Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 at a location approved by PPDS. The driveway is to provide future maintenance access to the park.
g. The Applicant shall rough grade Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 as required by City Code to provide positive drainage as approved by PPDS. As per City Code, acreage with an existing or proposed drainage area, easement, public right- of-way, or areas with 10% and greater slopes shall not receive parkland dedication credit. Quimby parkland credit can be granted only to “buildable acres.”
h. Upon completion of all public improvements identified above, the Developer shall contact the Landscape Architecture Section (LAS) of the PPDS to schedule an inspection. This condition shall be considered complete when all improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the LAS of the PPDS.

A113. Multi-Use Trail: A multi-use trail/class 1 bike trail, and adjacent landscaping shall be dedicated and constructed as specified below and in compliance with the PPDS “Multi-Use Trail Design Guidelines” available by contacting PPDS. The 27 multi-use trail in Lots OS-1,OS-5, OS-7, OS-8 shall be dedicated as an IOD or an Exclusive Recreation Easement (ERE), as approved by PPDS. At the time of dedication, the applicant shall:
a. take all actions necessary to convey to and vest in the City full and clear title to the multi-use trail, including all interests necessary for maintenance and access;

b. provide a title report and title insurance insuring that clear title in fee is vested in the City at the time of dedication;

c. provide a Phase 1 environmental site assessment of the multi-use trail;

d. if the environmental site assessment identifies any physical conditions or defects in the multi-use trail that would interfere with its intended use as a multi-use trail, as determined by PPDS in its sole discretion, applicant shall complete a supplemental assessment and remedy any such physical condition or defect, to the satisfaction of PPDS; and

e. take all actions necessary to ensure that the multi-use trail is free and clear of any wetland mitigation, endangered or threatened animal or plant species, sensitive habitat or other development restrictions. The applicant shall be solely responsible, and at its sole cost, for any required mitigation costs or measures associated with the multi-use trail.

A114. The applicant shall submit and obtain PPDS approval of the alignment and design of the multi- use trail prior to submitting improvement plans for the trail.

A115. The proposed multi-use trail in Lots OS-1, OS-5, OS-7, and OS-8 shall comply with Class I bike trail standards, including regulatory signage. The trail shall be 12’ of asphalt concrete paving, with clear, graded shoulders that are a minimum of 2’ in width, and a minimum of 3’ of landscape area. Shoulders should be decomposed granite or an alternate material approved by PPDS. Pavement sections shall be 3" minimum asphaltic concrete over 6" min of aggregate base, with a centerline stripe (refer to PPDS Trail detail and specification).

A116. Vehicular access controls shall be placed at the entrance to all access points to the trail (refer to PPDS details and specifications for approved designs).

A117. Wherever possible and as approved by PPDS and the Department of Utilities, multi-use trails shall be designed as joint-use with utility service roads utilizing 28 the service roads aggregate base as the trail’s aggregate base course. Applicant shall design the pavement to meet all required design loads.

A118. Where a multi-use trail is located adjacent to any embankment with a greater than 4:1 slope, the Applicant shall, at his expense, install a post-and-cable fence along the top of the embankment, between the embankment and the multi-use trail.

A119. The Applicant shall disclose the location of the planned multi-use trail to all future/potential owners of parcels within the subdivision.

A120. Open Space: The following conditions apply to the open space areas as shown on the tentative subdivision map as Lots OS-1, B/OS-5, OS-7, and OS- 8:
a. The Open Space Lots OS-1, , B/OS-5, OS-7, and OS-8 shall be dedicated to the city in an irrevocable offer of dedication (IOD). b. The Applicant shall establish a financing district to fund the maintenance of any open space areas shown on the tentative map.
c. The Applicant shall show and label on plan the extent of any designated wetlands acreage and any required setback or buffer areas (not to be developed/improved).
d. The Applicant shall, at their expense, install an attached 5’ minimum wide concrete sidewalk at the back-of-curb along the streets that front on all open space areas except along OS-1.
e. The Applicant shall, at their expense, install signage as approved by PPDS at all open space areas identifying the open space name or land use and outlining public use regulations (such as “No dumping”, or “Stay on posted trails”).

A121. Site Plan: The applicant shall submit a site plan and electronic file showing the location of all utilities on the park site to PPDS for review and approval.

A122. Design Coordination for PUE’s and Facilities: If a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for underground facilities and appurtenances currently exists or is required to be dedicated adjacent to a public street right-of- way contiguous to Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3, the applicant shall coordinate with PPDS and SMUD regarding the location of appurtenances within the PUE to minimize visual obstruction in relation to the park(s) and to best accommodate future park improvements. The applicant shall facilitate a meeting(s) with SMUD and PPDS 29 prior to SMUD’s facilities coordinating meeting for the project. The Lots OS-1 and OS – 8 should exclude the PUEs, to the extent possible.

A123. Turnkey Park Development: If the Applicant desires to construct a turnkey park, the Applicant shall notify PPDS in writing no later than approval of the tentative subdivision map for the project and shall enter into a City standard turnkey park construction agreement to construct the park improvements to the satisfaction of the City’s PPDS. The park construction agreement shall address (1) the preparation and approval of the park design and improvement plans, (2) time for completion of the park (or of each phase of the park if the park is not to be completed in one phase) as a function of build-out of the subdivision or issuance of occupancy permits, (3) any credits to be awarded to the applicant against the City’s Park Impact Fee (PIF) that would be payable as a condition of issuance of building permits for the dwelling units to be constructed in the subdivision, (4) maintenance of all improvements to be accepted into the park maintenance financing district for a minimum of one year and until a minimum of 50% of the residential units to be served by the park have received occupancy permits, unless the City agrees to accept park maintenance into the District at an earlier date. The one-year maintenance period shall begin following the issuance by the City of a notice of completion for the improvements.

A124. The Developer shall be responsible for maintenance (weed abatement) of IOD Lots OS-1, OS-5, OS-7, and OS-8, Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3 until the time that the City records acceptance of the IODs and/or EREs.

A125. The applicant shall include in the environmental document for this project a list of proposed park improvements as provided by PPDS. Contact PPDS for typical neighborhood park amenities.

A126. The Developer shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the PPDS prior to use of any park site as a construction staging area.

A127. Maintenance District: The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a parks maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos special tax district) or annex the project into an existing parks maintenance district. The applicant shall pay all city fees for formation of or annexation to a parks maintenance district. (Contact Infrastructure Finance, Brent Mueller, (916) 808-5715, [email protected]).

30 Miscellaneous
A128. Title to any property required to be dedicated to the City in fee shall be conveyed free and clear of all rights, restrictions, easements, impediments, encumbrances, liens, taxes, assessments or other security interests of any kind (hereafter collectively referred to as "Encumbrances"), except as provided herein. The applicant shall take all actions necessary to remove any and all Encumbrances prior to approval of the Final Map and acceptance of the dedication by City, except that the applicant shall not be required to remove Encumbrances of record, including but not limited to easements or rights-of-way for public roads or public utilities, which, in the sole and exclusive judgment of the City, cannot be removed and/or would not interfere with the City's future use of the property. The applicant shall provide title insurance with the City as the named beneficiary assuring the conveyance of such title to City.

A129. Form a Homeowner's Association. CC&R's shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of all private streets, private drives, common landscaping, public street frontage/landscaping and any common areas, etc.

Advisory Notes:

The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map:

ADV 1. If unusual amounts of bone, stone, or artifacts are uncovered, work, in the area within the distance required by the mitigation measures outlined in the SCEA document will cease immediately and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to develop, if necessary, further mitigation measures to reduce any archaeological impact to a less than significant effect before construction resumes. A note shall be placed on the final improvement plans referencing this condition.

ADV 2. House plans shall comply with City Code Chapter 17.508 Driveways which includes:
 All driveways shall be at least 5-ft away from the property line (17.508.040.J).
 Residential driveways shall have a width of at least 10-ft and a depth of at least 20-ft measured from the right-of-way line (unless with an approved deviation) (17.508.050.A).
31  Garages off alleys and private drives shall be set back at least 4- feet away from the alley/private drive right-of-way
(17.508.070.D.3).

ADV 3. Regional San has the dual 66-inch Sacramento Force Main (Regional San operating system N50) and 16-inch SPA Recycled Water Line (Regional San operating system N48) along with associated easements located within the proposed project’s boundaries.

ADV 4. The subject property is outside the boundaries of SASD but within the Urban Service Boundary and Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District (Regional San) boundaries. Regional San will provide ultimate conveyance and treatment of the sewer generated from this site, but the Sacramento City Utilities Department’s approval will be required for local sewage service.

ADV 5. The City of Sacramento (City) is responsible for providing local sewer service to the proposed project site via their local sanitary sewer collection system. Regional San is responsible for the conveyance of wastewater from the City collection system to the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SRWTP).

ADV 6. The proposed project is located in a Zone X on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs).

Accordingly, the project site lies in an area with no requirements to elevate or flood proof.

ADV 7. The proposed Lot B/OS-5 is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as AE zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). City Code Chapter

15.104 Floodplain Management Regulations require that any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any residential structure located in AE zone must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated a minimum of one (1) foot above the base flood elevation BFE. Commercial structures have the option of floodproofing (Floodproofing Certificate will be required) to one (1) foot above the BFE in lieu of the elevation requirement. New construction of and/or substantial improvement to any residential or commercial structure will require a Hold Harmless Agreement and an Elevation Certificate.

ADV 8. The existing 16-in recycled water in Future 24th Street is owned and maintained by the County. The proposed recycled water within the project 32 site shall be owned and maintained by the County and shall comply with all County requirements and pay all required fees.

ADV 9. As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a. Title 17, 17.512 Park Dedication, due prior to recordation of the final map for this project is estimated at 9.56 acres. This is based on the housing unit count of 452 single-family dwelling units and 711 multi- family dwelling units. The project is dedicating 9.09 acres of parkland. The remaining 0.478 acres; the payment of Quimby in- Lieu fees; or enter into an Agreement for Private Recreation Facility Credits: City Code Chapter 17.512, Sections 17.512.90 through 100.

Any change to the size of park lots will affect the dedication requirement.
b. Title 18, 18.56 Park Development Impact Fee, due at the time of issuance of building permit. The Park Development Impact Fee due for this project is based on the Remainder City Zone Rate of $2.94 per square foot for residential projects, with a minimum rate of $2,214 for units under 750 square feet and a maximum of $5,903 for units over 2,000 square feet. Any change in these factors will change the amount of the PIF due. The fee is calculated using factors at the time that the project is submitted for building permit. c. Community Facilities District 2002-02, Neighborhood Park Maintenance. CFD Annexation CFD maintained public park and open spaces areas include Park Lots P-1, P-2, P-3, Open Space Lots OS-1, OS-5, OS-7, and OS-8, Lot Z. Homeowner’s Association to be responsible for 10 foot wide sidewalks, pathway connection and fences between Lots HDR-1 and HDR-2.
d. If feasible, each park site should allow for residential uses facing the park and open space to have “eyes on park” for increased security and safety.
e. The project is adjacent to the future Delta Shores community park to the south. The applicant should ensure clearly marked access, i.e., signage, from the Stone Beetland development to the Delta Shores community park.
33 f. Any change in the size of Lot B-1 which reduces the size of the park, affects the parkland dedication.

B. The Site Plan and Design Review of the Tentative Subdivision Map is approved based on the following conditions of approval:

Planning Division
B1. To the extent feasible, the developer shall direct all construction traffic to utilize Cosumnes River Boulevard and future 24th Street for access to the site; construction traffic shall avoid using Detroit Boulevard for access to the site.

Department of Utilities
B2. Per City Code Section, 13.04.070, multiple water service to a single lot or parcel may be allowed if approved by DOU Development Review and Operations and Maintenance staff. Any new water services (other than fire) shall be metered. Excess services shall be abandoned to the satisfaction of the DOU.

B3. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water study for review and approval by the DOU. The water distribution system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Water Planning Section (916-808-1400) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements.

B4. Common area landscaping shall have a separate street tap for a metered irrigation service.

B5. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual.
34 B6. Projects that generate 25 ESD’s or more will require a sanitary sewer Plan Study as described in Section 9 of the City Design and Procedures Manual.

This study and shed map shall be approved by the DOU. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Sewer Planning Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any sewer related requirements.

B7. Prior to the construction of Future 24th Street, the applicant shall relocate the existing sump 53 pump station to the satisfaction of the DOU. The Sump 53 shall be constructed and fully functional to the satisfaction of the DOU prior to connection to the City’s public sewer system. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, land dedication (if applicable) and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies, and private landowners for the construction of these facilities. (Note: It is recommended that the applicant coordinate with the Delta Shores development on the relocation and construction of Sump 53).

B8. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the improvement plan application, the applicant shall prepare a project specific drainage study meeting the criteria specified in the current Onsite Design Manual and/or the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. The drainage study shall be consistent with the existing Basin 89 Drainage Masterplan for the project area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval. (Note: A maintenance agreement may be required for detention and Low Impact Development (LID) features.).

B9. Construct new water, sewer, and drainage facilities per the approved water, sewer, and drainage studies within the proposed public streets to the satisfaction of the DOU. The public mains shall be located within the asphalt section of the public right-of-way (except for Lot M, Lot N, Lot U, Lot X, Lot OS-8 as approved by the DOU). (Note: Public mains are not permitted to be located within median areas. The proposed public drainage main within C Street is located within a landscaped median. These mains will be required to be located outside of the median area, or as approved by the DOU.) B10. Prior to the initiation of any water, sewer or storm drainage services to the project, a homeowner association (HOA), or a privately funded maintenance district shall be formed and C.C. & R’s shall be approved by the City and 35 recorded assuring maintenance of water, sewer and storm drainage facilities within the private drives, roads, alleys, and/or landscaped areas. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The C.C.&R’s must provide that the City-approved provisions regarding water, sewer and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent.

If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

B11. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is higher or as approved by the DOU.

B12. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

B13. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required.

Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

B14. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

B15. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings.

These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.
36 B16. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area not served by an existing regional water quality control facility and/or the project has more than twenty acres of new or modified impervious area, therefore, Low Impact Development (LID), certified full trash capture control, and on-site treatment control measures will be required. The on-site storm water treatment control measures required may affect site design and site configuration and should be considered during early planning stages. The applicant shall provide a stormwater quality management plan to the satisfaction of the DOU.

B17. A maintenance agreement may be required for all on-site treatment control measures and on-site full capture trash control systems. Contact DOU for a list of accepted proprietary devices if considered for treatment control and full capture trash control. Construction drawings must include all proposed source controls, on-site water quality measures, and on-site full capture trash control features and devices selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” for appropriate measures.

B18. Execute and deliver to the City, in recordable form, an IOD in fee title to Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5 for a water quality and flood control basin(s) or as acceptable by the DOU. If the exact location and dimensions differ from those specified for Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5 on the final map, the location and dimensions shall be revised in accordance to the DOU determinations. The Detention/Water Quality Basins shall be sized to accommodate the detention volume per the approved drainage study, service roads, ramps, drainage structures and all appurtenances. If Lot B/OS-5 is placed outside the project boundary additional language or a separate agreement will be required addressing land dedication, funding, access, and maintenance. All agreements shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

B19. Prior to vertical construction within the project, the applicant shall construct the detention/water quality basins and the inlet and outlet structures and its appurtenances per the approved Drainage Master Plan and shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU. The applicant shall submit a separate set of improvement plans for the detention and water quality basins. Prior to design, the applicant shall meet with the Drainage CIP and Water Quality Section within DOU to discuss the design standards. The detention and water quality basins and the inlet and outlet structures may be phased to the 37 satisfaction of DOU. (Note: At a minimum the following shall be provided: A post and cable fence shall be constructed around the basins on Lot B-1 and Lot B/OS-5. The DOU standard for a maintenance road consists of a 12-ft wide asphalt or crush rock with a 2-ft shoulder on each side and a surface rated for H-20 loading. Any improvements above and beyond (i.e., concrete, special pavers, etc.) the DOU standard will be required to be maintained by the HOA. Driveways off public roads providing access to the basins shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the DOU. Proper vehicle and personnel access will be required to any manholes, inlets, outlets, and/or junction structures located within the wet basin area(s).)
B20. The proposed basin plans include features that are above and beyond the City’s standard maintenance obligations and therefore, the applicant shall annex Basin 1 and Basin 2 into an approved City maintenance district. The developer shall maintain the detention/water quality basins for a period of two (2) years or until acceptance by the City into a City approved maintenance district, whichever is less. The two-year period shall begin following the issuance of a notice of completion by the City for the detention/water quality basin. Prior to the City acceptance, the developer shall rectify all defective items, including the removal of any sediment or debris that has accumulated to the satisfaction of the DOU. If required by the DOU, a maintenance agreement shall be executed.

B21. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies for the construction of this project.

B22. The applicant is required to review and update the “Delta Shores Morrison Creek Flooding Analysis” by Wood Rodgers; a study provided by SAFCA that analyzed 200-year flood protection. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development does not create any new areas of 200-year flooding (including areas outside of the project) with depths greater than 3-feet per the requirements dictated by DWR Urban level of Protection (ULOP) criteria.

B23. The proposed development is located adjacent to a Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) easement. The applicant shall comply with all SAFCA requirements and pay all required fees.

Solid Waste
General Residential Solid Waste Requirements
38 B24. Project must meet the requirements outlined in City Code Chapter 13.10.

B25. There must be sufficient space to store three cans for each dwelling unit (garbage, mixed recycling, and organics recycling). The space needed is approximately 35 inches by 87 inches and be screened from the public right- of-way, per City Code Chapter 13.10.100 C. Future development plans must show where cans will be stored.

B26. There must be sufficient space to set out three cans (garbage, mixed recycling, and organics recycling) and remain in compliance with City Code Chapter 13.10.100. Depending on service levels, this may mean up to 8 feet of curb space required. Cans must be placed along the curb closest to the property for service.

B27. Solid waste trucks must be able to safely move about the project, with minimum backing, and able to empty the bins and cans safely.

General Commercial Solid Waste Requirements
B28. Project must meet the requirements outlined in City Code Chapter 13.24 and

17.616.

B29. Waste enclosures must have sufficient space to accommodate bins for trash, recycling, and organics. Smaller containers may be used with an increase in collection frequency.

B30. Applicant must provide a statement of how trash, recycling and organics will be stored and collected after project is complete, per City Code Chapter

17.616.020. This statement must explain how the property manager will collect from the trash, recycling and organics receptacles located around the site and place each material type in the appropriate bin in the waste enclosure.

B31. Solid waste trucks must be able to safely move about the property, with minimum backing, and be able to empty the bins and cans safely.

B32. This project will be required to submit a Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris plan, as outlined on the City’s website at
http://www.cityofsacramento.org/public-works/RSW/Collection- Services/Recycling/Construction-and-Demolition.

Please contact the Solid Waste C&D team if you have any questions:
39 Phone: (916) 808-0965
Email: C&[email protected]
Advisory Notes
ADV 1. The proposed Lot B/OS-5 is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as AE zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs).  City Code Chapter 15.104 Floodplain Management Regulations require that any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any residential structure located in AE zone must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated a minimum of one (1) foot above the base flood elevation BFE.  Commercial structures have the option of floodproofing (Floodproofing Certificate will be required) to one (1) foot above the BFE in lieu of the elevation requirement. New construction of and/or substantial improvement to any residential or commercial structure will require a Hold Harmless Agreement and an Elevation Certificate.

ADV 2. Non-standard drive lanes/access roads used for Fire Department access that are less than 28 feet in width shall be marked "No Parking Fire Lane" on both sides; roads less than 36 feet in width shall be marked on one side.

ADV 3. All-Electric New Buildings Requirement. Pursuant to Chapter 15.30 of Sacramento City Code, new buildings of 1-3 stories will be required to be all- electric beginning on January 1, 2023, and new buildings 4 stories or more will be required to be all-electric beginning on January 1, 2026. An all-electric building is a building that does not have natural gas piping or propane plumbing installed on a lot or within a building.

Complete building permit applications (including payment of all required fees) filed with and accepted by the City’s Building Division prior to the effective dates will not be subject to all-electric requirements.

Applicants are advised to plan for all-electric compliance beginning with initial early design. Solutions include but are not limited to: Designing projects to create space for electric infrastructure and equipment; utilizing energy efficiency to reduce electrical loads; and consulting with SMUD to address electric infrastructure issues. Limited exemptions may apply. For more information, please visit the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsacramento.org/SacElectrificationOrdinance 40 C. The Tree Permit to remove six private protected trees is approved based on the following conditions of approval:

C1. Large canopy trees shall be planted in right-of-way planter strips, spaced 40 ft. on center, with consideration for necessary infrastructure.

C2. General Tree Protection – The following Tree Preservation Measures shall be included in all future plans in the General Notes, Grading Plans, Utility Plans, Demolition Plan, Landscape Plan and the offsite plans if trees will be impacted by work proposed on each sheet. This does not replace any request for a project arborist’s tree protection plan.

C3. This project shall contract with a project arborist experienced with tree protection and construction that is required to:

C4. Attend the preconstruction meetings to approve of and inform contractors of all tree protection measures.

C5. Visit the site before and after demolition, grading and landscaping as well as at least twice each month during construction to ensure that tree protection measures are implemented and maintained.

C6. Be responsible for correcting any site conditions that may negatively impact the trees and revisit the site to ensure that corrective action was properly implemented.

C7. The project arborist shall report in writing to Urban Forestry all violations and tree protection failures along with corrective action taken and expected outcomes.

C8. All concrete sidewalks and driveways shall be retained throughout construction to protect the roots and soil from the impacts of construction activities. a. Existing driveways shall be used as the sole access to the site.

Where there are no existing driveways, access shall be limited to a one or two locations outside the dripline of protected trees that have protection from soil compaction with the use of one or more of the following: A 6-inch layer of hardwood chips covered by ¾-inch plywood or trench plates, geotextile fabric covered by a 6-inch layer of hardwood chips or an alternative that is approved by the City Arborist.

C9. Right-of-way planters and City trees shall be separated from the construction site with a six-foot high chain link fence that shall remain throughout the 41 duration of the project to protect trees and to prevent construction traffic from compacting the soil in the planters.

C10. Construction trailers and port-a-potties shall be placed on existing hardscape or bridged over the tree protection zone or planter so as not to compact soil.

C11. Any Regulated Work within the dripline or Tree Protection Zone of a protected tree shall be separately permitted prior to the start of construction and supervised by a Certified Arborist. Submit a tree permit application and a tree protection plan created by a Certified Arborist to [email protected] and refer to the planning project number or off-site project number.

C12. All excavation, grading, or trenching within the dripline of a protected tree for the purpose of utility installation, constructing foundations, footings, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, or any other reason shall employ one of the following methods: Hydro-excavation, pneumatic excavation or hand digging and shall be directly supervised by a Certified Arborist.

C13. There shall be no excavation deeper than the existing excavation for sidewalks within the dripline of protected trees.

C14. There shall be no grade changes within the dripline of protected trees. All grade changes shall be accommodated onsite.

C15. There shall be no soil compaction within the dripline of protected trees.

C16. There shall be no non-native soil, non-organic matter or structural soil added to the right-of-way planter.

C17. The following is a list of activities that require a tree permit if they are to occur or be used within the right-of-way planter and/or within the tree protection zone of protected trees: any regulated work as defined in SCC

12.56, excavation, grade changes, trenches, root or canopy pruning, or boring.

C18. The following is a list of activities that are prohibited within the right-of-way planter and/or tree protection zone of protected trees: pedestrian and equipment traffic that could compact the soil or physically damage roots, parking vehicles, equipment and/or port-a-potties, storing of soil, construction materials, petroleum products, water or building refuse, disposing of wash water, paint, cement, fuel or other potentially damaging liquids, and any other activities that may have negative impacts on the trees and soil. 42 C19. All trees shall be watered regularly according to the recommendation of the project arborist.

C20. The applicant shall be financially responsible for any damage to City trees associated with the project. Accidental or negligent actions that damage City trees may result in a penalty. The monetary value of any such damages will be appraised by the City Urban Forester or his authorized representative and shall be expressed as the monetary equivalent of all labor and materials required to bring the tree in question to a state of comparable utility with regards to its condition and function prior to the beginning of the project.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Tentative Subdivision Map
Exhibit B – Tentative Map Design Deviations Memo
Exhibit C – Tree Permit Application
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

R
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 3738394041424344454647484950515253
54555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687 888990919293949596
979899100
101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130 131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148
149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180 181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224 225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277 278279280281282283284285286289290291292293294295296297298299300301303304305306307308309310311312 313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335 336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366 367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382
383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402

LOT ALOT BLOT C
LOT D
LOT E
LOT F

LOT MLOT K
LOT I

LOT PLOT S

LOT QLOT ULOT XLOT Y

LOT LLOT N
LOT V
LOT OS-8

BURLINGTON WAY

DETROIT BLVD

DEERHAVEN WAY

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD
FUTURE 24TH STREET

MORRISON CREEK

LOT Z L
L L
K
L
G
A
L
K
M
O
M
K
J
N
M M
N
C K
B
Q
P
N J
D
R R I
A
H
R
R
F
E
H
L
L

DETROIT / SOUTHGATENEIGHBORHOOD

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

MESA GRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

D STREET

F STREET

G STREET

G STREET

G STREET
LOT LDR-1
LOT B-1
LOT PU-1 /RT STATION
LOT OS-1
LOT W
LOT OS-7
LOT OS-2
LOT OS-3
LOT OS-4

E STREET

H STREET

I STREET

J STREET

K STREET

L STREET

L STREET

I STREET

M STREET

N STREET

P STREET

O STREET

E STREET

Q COURT

Q STREET

S STREETT STREET

Q STREET

P COURT
LOT P-1
LOT P-2
LOT P-3S COURT
LOT MDR-1
LOT MDR-2
LOT LDR-2
LOT LDR-3
LOT OS-6
LOT HDR-3B
LOT HDR-3A
LOT CMU-1LOT HDR-1
LOT HDR-2LOT B/ OS-5

TRANSIT CORRIDOR
K
D
D

F D STREETF

REMOVE EXISTINGSTORM DRAIN

REMOVE EXISTINGSTORM DRAIN
L N EXISTING FORCE MAIN TO BEABANDONED AFTER RELOCATIONOF SEWER PUMP 53 EXISTING SEWER PUMP 53 TO BE RELOCATED SOUTH OFCOSUMNES RIVER BLVD WITH 18" FORCE MAIN INSTALLED INCOSUMNES RIVER BLVD TO FRANKLIN BOULEVARD(PER DELTA SHORES SEWER MASTER PLAN)

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

REMOVEEXISTING TREEREMOVEEXISTING TREES

HALBIONWAY

ANNARBORWAY

R R COURT
LOT H
LOT J CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ON EAST SIDEOF 24TH STREET FROM A STREETTO COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD 2' RAISED MEDIANTHRU I STREETINTERSECTION
LOT O
LOT R
LOT T
LOT G
302
288287
N

REMOVEEXISTING TREES
F:\3377-000\ACAD\TM\SMALL LOT\TM_OVERALL_TM01.DWG
SMALL LOT TENTATIVE MAPSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=100'DATE: MAY 31, 2023 3002001000CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456 ABBREVIATIONS:GENERAL NOTES:LEGEND:

City of Sacramento
County of Sacramento

C I T Y L I M I T S

POCKET ROAD
24th STREET

FREEPORTROAD

AMHURST STREET

SOUTHRIVERROAD
Sacramento
RiverFreeport Bridge
ROUTE 5
INTESTATEFREEWAYBOULEVARD21st STREETMEADOWVIEW

OVERALLPROJECTSITE

STONECREST AVENUEBEACH LAKE ROADCOSUMNES RIVERBOULEVARDDELTASHORESCIRCLE

VICINITY MAP

LOT AREA SUMMARY

LAND AREA SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

O
Q
R
M
N
PRIVATE DRIVE AISLE 1

RESIDENTIAL STREET W/EXTENDED SIDEWALK

PRIVATE STREET

RESIDENTIAL STREET(NO PLANTERS)
PRIVATE DRIVE AISLE 2

PRESIDENTIAL STREET W/ PARKINGAND EXTENDED SIDEWALK
G
ACE
DD H
J
K
FUTURE 24TH STREET

D STREET

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

LLLLKL STREET

I STREETJ STREETK STREETI STREET

B STREETL K

A STREETMOM STREETN STREETP COURTLK

C STREET
M
KA
P

NP STREETE STREETE STREETG STREETG STREET

D STREETF
F

F STREETID RRQ COURTR COURT

HHH STREETG STREET

RRS COURTT STREETS STREET

L STREETL
B Q

Q STREETRQ STREET N
NN

LRESIDENTIAL STREET
F:\3377-000\ACAD\TM\SMALL LOT\TM_OVERALL_TM02.DWG
STREET SECTIONSSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=100'DATE: MAY 31, 2023 3002001000CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET

RESIDENTIAL STREET (WITH TRAIL)

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

RESIDENTIAL STREETMAJOR COLLECTOR (NO PARKING)

MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH EXTENDED SIDEWALK (NO PARKING)

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET (WITH WIDENED SIDEWALK)

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET (WITH TRAIL)

RESIDENTIAL STREET AT PARK
F
K
H
J
I
B
E
C
D

KEY MAP
24TH STREETG
TYPICAL CLASS 1 TRAIL
MINOR COLLECTOR (PARKING 1 SIDE)A
1430 BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD, SUITE 110 § ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95747 § (916) 375-1877 § www.cbandg.com ROSEVILLE § SAN RAMON
CIVIL ENGINEERS § SURVEYORS § PLANNERS
P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx March 28, 2023
Job No.: 3377-000
Revised: May 31, 2023

Proposed Design Deviations
Stone Beetland Property
Sacramento, California

The proposed Stone Beetland project is located directly adjacent to the Morrison Creek RT Light Rail Station. The project is designed to provide a mixed-use community with a range of residential densities that will be designed to be highly transi t supportive utilizing a system of trails and bike facilities to encourage connections to transit. The following are the proposed design deviations to the City of Sacramento Design & Procedures Manual that are reflected on the project’s Tentative Subdivision Map in order to achieve the highe r residential densities and transit-oriented development design. The loca tions of these deviations are high lighted on the enclosed Tentative Subdivision Map.

Design Deviation #1 – A Street

Elimination of northern parking aisle and sidewalk on A Street.

Description of the Deviation

A Street is a Minor Collector. The proposed street section for A Street deviates from the Typical Cross-Section for a Minor Collector per Plate 15-5 of the Design & Procedures Manual. The deviations proposed remove the parking lane and sidewalk along the northern side of this street.

Justification of the Deviation

A Street is adjacent to a Class I trail corridor planned along the northern boundary of the project.

There are no proposed land uses directly along this northern side of the street. Accordingly, the parking and sidewalks are not necessary along this north side of the A Street.

Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 2.1.3
Complete and Well-Structured Neighborhoods – promote the design of complete and well- structured neighborhoods whose physical layout promote walking, biking, and transit use.

Stone Beetland Property- Proposed Design Deviations March 28, 2023

Revised: May 31, 2023

P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx  Policy LU 2.5.1
Connected Neighborhoods, Corridors and Centers – minimize barriers between neighborhoods and open space corridors.

 Policy LU 2.5.2
Overcoming Barriers to Accessibility – remo ve and minimize the effect of manmade barriers to accessibility between neighborhoods and open space corridors.

 Policy 4.1.2
Neighborhood Amenities – provide convenient access with walking and biking distances for city residents.

 Policy M 6.1.4
Reduction of Parking Areas – reduce the amount of land devoted to parking.

Design Deviation #2 – H Street & Albion Way

Modified residential street sections of H Street and Albion Way to match the existing street section to the north.

Description of the Deviation

H Street and Albion Way are residential streets that are extensions of existing streets to the north within the Detroit Neighborhood. The proposed street section for these streets deviates from the Typical Cross-Section for a Residential Street per Plate 15-2 of the Design & Procedures Manual.

The deviations propose to eliminate the landscape planter and provide a 6-foot sidewalk (including the 6-inch curb width).

Justification of the Deviation

H Street and Albion Way are extensions of exis ting streets to the north. The proposed street sections for these streets match the existing conditi ons to the north. This is consistent with Note #4 on Plate 15-2 that indicates the planters may be eliminated to conform to existing streets.

Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 4.1.7:

Neighborhood Transitions – provide for appropriate transitions in order to maintain consistent scale, form, and character on both sides of public streetscapes.

Stone Beetland Property- Proposed Design Deviations March 28, 2023

Revised: May 31, 2023

P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx  Policy LU 4.5.2:

Compact neighborhoods: create new residential neighborhoods th at include efficient use of land and infrastructure by being compact with higher average densities.

Design Deviation #3 – MDR-1 Intersection Spacing

Intersection spacing between intersections on the same side of the street is less than 120-feet from the nearest curb return to nearest curb return.

Description of the Deviation

The intersections within MDR-1 are spaced less th an 120-feet, but not less than 114-feet, as measured from nearest curb return to nearest curb return.

Justification of the Deviation

The proposed medium density residential la nd use within the MDR-1 neighborhood includes small-lot single family residential lots with a typical dimension of 34-feet wide and 73-feet deep.

The typical depth of 73-feet results in a reduced intersection spacing that is less than the standard of 120-feet minimum per Section 15-7.3 of the Design & Procedures Manual.

Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 4.5.2:

Compact Neighborhoods – create new residential neighborhoods that include efficient use of land and infrastructure by being compact with higher average densities.

 Policy H 2.2.1
Quality Infill Development – promote quality infill development by maintaining and implementing flexible development standards.

Design Deviation #4 – LDR-2 & 3 Residential Street Section

Modified residential street section to match the existing street section to the north.

Description of the Deviation

The street sections within LDR-2 & 3 are propos ed to eliminate the landscape parkways. This provides consistency with the existing streets within the Detroit Neighborhood to the north of these proposed neighborhoods. The Typical Cross-Section for a Residential Street per Plate 15-2 of the Stone Beetland Property- Proposed Design Deviations March 28, 2023

Revised: May 31, 2023

P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx Design & Procedures Manual includes Note #4 that indicates the planter may be removed to meet residential housing densities or to conform to existing streets.

Justification of the Deviation

The proposed street sections for these streets match the existing conditions to the north and are necessary to meet the desired residential densities for this portion of the project. This is consistent with Note #4 of Plate 15-2 as mentioned above.

Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 4.1.7:

Neighborhood Transitions – provide for appropriate transitions in order to maintain consistent scale, form, and character on both sides of public streetscapes.

 Policy LU 4.5.2:

Compact Neighborhoods – create new residential neighborhoods that include efficient use of land and infrastructure by being compact with higher average densities.

Design Deviation #5 – LDR-2 Cul-de-Sac Length

The length of Q Court exceeds the maximum lengt h of a cul-de-sac, but an emergency access connection is provided to Burlington Way.

Description of the Deviation

The length of Q Court exceeds 500-feet, which is th e maximum length of a cul-de-sac defined in City Code Section 16.40.080. A proposed emergency vehicle access connection to Burlington Way to the north is provided near the end of this cul-de-sac to provide a second point of emergency access less than 500 feet from the end of the cul-de-sac.

Justification of the Deviation

The proposed length of the Q Court cul-de-sac adhe res to the feedback fr om the existing Detroit Neighborhood to the north and limits vehicular connections from the proposed project to the existing neighborhood streets. Accordingly, only an emergency access connection is provided to Burlington Way.

Stone Beetland Property- Proposed Design Deviations March 28, 2023

Revised: May 31, 2023

P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 4.1.7:

Neighborhood Transitions – provide for appropriate transitions in order to maintain consistent scale, form, and character on both sides of public streetscapes.

 Policy LU 4.5.2:

Compact Neighborhoods – create new residential neighborhoods that include efficient use of land and infrastructure by being compact with higher average densities.

Design Deviation #6 – D and E Street Intersection

Intersection angle less than 90-degrees at the D and E Street Intersection.

Description of the Deviation

The alignment of D Street is set to be parallel with the eastern boundary line, RT railway line, and the RT station parking lot. This is at an acute angle relative to the alignment of the north and south boundaries, which sets the alignment of E Street. This results in this intersection of D and E Street to be approximately 76-degrees, which is less than the 90-degrees noted in the Design and Procedures Manual.

Justification of the Deviation

The alignments of D and E Street are set in order to maintain optimized blocks of the high-density residential parcels planned directly adjacent to the RT station. In order to create a perpendicular intersection at this location, approximately 0.5-acre of HDR-3 would be lost, which is not feasible to meet the Transit-Oriented Development goals of the project. Additionally, this intersection is positioned to align with the entry to the RT station parking lot. The parking lot entry modifications have been coordinated with RT Planning and Engineering Staff. Lastly, the sight distances and truck turning maneuvers through the proposed intersection have been evaluated and are depicted on the enclosed supplemental exhibit to demonstrate there are no conflicts.

Facts Supporting the Deviation

The proposed street section will implement the following goals and policies of the General Plan:

 Policy LU 4.5.2:

Compact Neighborhoods – create new residential neighborhoods that include efficient use of land and infrastructure by being compact with higher average densities.

Stone Beetland Property- Proposed Design Deviations March 28, 2023

Revised: May 31, 2023

P:\3300 - 3399\3377-000\Memos\Memo-001_Stone Beetland_Design Deviations_01 rev.docx  Policy H 2.2.1
Quality Infill Development – promote quality infill development by maintaining and implementing flexible development standards.

Required Findings

The proposed site plan layout and associated deviations are proposed to increase housing density, create a bicycle, pedestrian and transit focu sed neighborhood integrati ng a mix of residential densities and open space corridors.

The requested design deviations will not impact health, safety, or welfare of the public, as it does not create a hazardous condition

The required deviations are in accordance with the intent and purposes of Title 16, Subdivisions and are consistent with the City of Sacramento’s General Plan Policies as described above.

R
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 3738394041424344454647484950515253
54555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687 888990919293949596
979899100
101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130 131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148
149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180 181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224 225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277 278279280281282283284285286289290291292293294295296297298299300301303304305306307308309310311312 313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335 336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366 367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382
383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402

LOT ALOT BLOT C
LOT D
LOT E
LOT F

LOT MLOT K
LOT I

LOT PLOT S

LOT QLOT ULOT XLOT Y

LOT LLOT N
LOT V
LOT OS-8

BURLINGTON WAY

DETROIT BLVD

DEERHAVEN WAY

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD
FUTURE 24TH STREET

MORRISON CREEK

LOT Z L
L L
K
L
G
A
L
K
M
O
M
K
J
N
M M
N
C K
B
Q
P
N J
D
R R I
A
H
R
R
F
E
H
L
L

DETROIT / SOUTHGATENEIGHBORHOOD

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

MESA GRANDENEIGHBORHOOD

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

D STREET

F STREET

G STREET

G STREET

G STREET
LOT LDR-1
LOT B-1
LOT PU-1 /RT STATION
LOT OS-1
LOT W
LOT OS-7
LOT OS-2
LOT OS-3
LOT OS-4

E STREET

H STREET

I STREET

J STREET

K STREET

L STREET

L STREET

I STREET

M STREET

N STREET

P STREET

O STREET

E STREET

Q COURT

Q STREET

S STREETT STREET

Q STREET

P COURT
LOT P-1
LOT P-2
LOT P-3S COURT
LOT MDR-1
LOT MDR-2
LOT LDR-2
LOT LDR-3
LOT OS-6
LOT HDR-3B
LOT HDR-3A
LOT CMU-1LOT HDR-1
LOT HDR-2LOT B/ OS-5

TRANSIT CORRIDOR
K
D
D

F D STREETF

REMOVE EXISTINGSTORM DRAIN

REMOVE EXISTINGSTORM DRAIN
L N EXISTING FORCE MAIN TO BEABANDONED AFTER RELOCATIONOF SEWER PUMP 53 EXISTING SEWER PUMP 53 TO BE RELOCATED SOUTH OFCOSUMNES RIVER BLVD WITH 18" FORCE MAIN INSTALLED INCOSUMNES RIVER BLVD TO FRANKLIN BOULEVARD(PER DELTA SHORES SEWER MASTER PLAN)

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

REMOVEEXISTING TREEREMOVEEXISTING TREES

HALBIONWAY

ANNARBORWAY

R R COURT
LOT H
LOT J CLASS I BIKE TRAIL ON EAST SIDEOF 24TH STREET FROM A STREETTO COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD 2' RAISED MEDIANTHRU I STREETINTERSECTION
LOT O
LOT R
LOT T
LOT G
302
288287
N

REMOVEEXISTING TREES
F:\3377-000\ACAD\TM\SMALL LOT\TM_OVERALL_TM01.DWG
SMALL LOT TENTATIVE MAPSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=100'DATE: MAY 31, 2023 3002001000CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456 ABBREVIATIONS:GENERAL NOTES:LEGEND:

City of Sacramento
County of Sacramento

C I T Y L I M I T S

POCKET ROAD
24th STREET

FREEPORTROAD

AMHURST STREET

SOUTHRIVERROAD
Sacramento
RiverFreeport Bridge
ROUTE 5
INTESTATEFREEWAYBOULEVARD21st STREETMEADOWVIEW

OVERALLPROJECTSITE

STONECREST AVENUEBEACH LAKE ROADCOSUMNES RIVERBOULEVARDDELTASHORESCIRCLE

VICINITY MAP

LOT AREA SUMMARY

LAND AREA SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

O
Q
R
M
N
PRIVATE DRIVE AISLE 1

RESIDENTIAL STREET W/EXTENDED SIDEWALK

PRIVATE STREET

RESIDENTIAL STREET(NO PLANTERS)
PRIVATE DRIVE AISLE 2

PRESIDENTIAL STREET W/ PARKINGAND EXTENDED SIDEWALK
G
ACE
DD H
J
K
FUTURE 24TH STREET

D STREET

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

LLLLKL STREET

I STREETJ STREETK STREETI STREET

B STREETL K

A STREETMOM STREETN STREETP COURTLK

C STREET
M
KA
P

NP STREETE STREETE STREETG STREETG STREET

D STREETF
F

F STREETID RRQ COURTR COURT

HHH STREETG STREET

RRS COURTT STREETS STREET

L STREETL
B Q

Q STREETRQ STREET N
NN

LRESIDENTIAL STREET
F:\3377-000\ACAD\TM\SMALL LOT\TM_OVERALL_TM02.DWG
STREET SECTIONSSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=100'DATE: MAY 31, 2023 3002001000CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET

RESIDENTIAL STREET (WITH TRAIL)

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

RESIDENTIAL STREETMAJOR COLLECTOR (NO PARKING)

MAJOR COLLECTOR WITH EXTENDED SIDEWALK (NO PARKING)

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET (WITH WIDENED SIDEWALK)

LOCAL COMMERCIAL STREET (WITH TRAIL)

RESIDENTIAL STREET AT PARK
F
K
H
J
I
B
E
C
D

KEY MAP
24TH STREETG
TYPICAL CLASS 1 TRAIL
MINOR COLLECTOR (PARKING 1 SIDE)A

D STREET

E STREET

MORRISONCREEKSTATION
STONEBEETLAND40ft Bus Design Vehicle
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_RT STATION SITE PLAN - ALT 2_2023.03.24.DWG ALTERNATIVE 2RT STATION ENTRYSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=20'DATE: MAY 3, 2023 6040200 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456

RT STATION PARKING LOT SUMMARYTYPEEXISTINGPROPOSED
LEGEND

E STREET

MORRISONCREEKSTATIONSTONEBEETLAND
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck

D STREET

E STREET

MORRISONCREEKSTATIONSTONEBEETLAND
SU-30 - Single Unit Truck
SU-30 - Single Unit TruckD STREET
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_RT STATION TRUCK TURNING.DWG RT STATIONTRUCK TURNINGSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1"=20'DATE: MAY 25, 2023 6040200 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456 LEGEND
SU-30 TRUCK TURNING

INTERSECTION VISIBILITY ANGLES
30 4 20SU-30 - Single Unit TruckOverall Length30.000ftOverall Width8.000ftOverall Body Height13.500ftMin Body Ground Clearance1.367ftTrack Width8.000ftLock-to-lock time5.00sMax Steering Angle (Virtual)31.80°

TREE PERMIT APPLICATION

PLEASE SUBMIT APPLICATION TO
Email: [email protected]
Postal Mail: 5730 24th Street Building 12-A Sacramento, California 95822 For questions please call 311
APPLICATIONS WILL BE CHARGED A FEE OF $50 TO COVER ARBORIST COSTS

INVOICE WILL BE MAILED TO APPLICANT AFTER PROCESSING
Applicant Information
Property Owner
Agent
Name: ______________________________ Company: ____________________________________________ Address: ____________________________ City/Zip: _______________________ Phone: (____)__________ Email:__________________________________________ State Contractor License #____________________ Property Owner Information (if different):

Name: __________________________________________ Phone ( ) _________________________ Address: __________________________________________________________________________________ Owner/Agent Statement
Property Owner Consent— I am the legal owner of record of the land specified in this application or am authorized and empowered to act as an agent on behalf of the owner of record on all matters relating to this application. I declare that the foregoing is true and correct and accept that false or inaccurate owner authorization may invalidate or delay action on this application. x A tree permit is nontransferable and must be kept on site when any work described in the permit is taking place. x It is understood and agreed by the permittee that when any work is completed it shall constitute an acceptance of the permit general provisions. x Any person who violates any provision of Sacramento City Code 12.56 is subject to criminal sanctions, civil actions, and administrative penalties up to $25,000 for each day the violation continues.

Signature: _____________________________________________________ Date: ______________________ Tree Information

City Tree
Residential: Front Yard Back Yard Side Yard

Private Protected Tree
Commercial
Proposed Activity:

Prune
Remove
Plant
Encroach into TPZ
Other______________________
Address/Location of Tree: __________________________________________________________________ Number of Trees: ________ Tree Species and Diameter: __________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ Reason for Action**:_______________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________ **Any of the following items may be required to accompany this application:
™ Arborist report ™ Authorization of the property owner ™ Landscape or tree planting plan ™ Tree replacement plan ™ Tree protection plan ™ Proof of CA State License Board compliance ™ Site map ™ Any other information as deemed necessary
o $25,000 for each day the violat
____________________
O
O
O
Angelo Obertello Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc.
1430 Blue Oaks Blvd, Ste 110 Roseville, 95747 916 788-4456 [email protected] N/A
JP Land Holding, LLC 778-0008
1478 Stone Point Drive, Ste 100, Roseville, CA 95661
05/19/2023
Northeast of Cosumnes River Blvd / 24th Street Intersection 7 #594-Interior Live Oak, 10" Dia / #595-Interior Live Oak, 12.5" Dia / #597-Interior Live Oak, 12.5" Dia / #599-N.California Black Walnut, 12.5" Dia / # 600-Valley Oak, 19.5" Dia #1-Goodding's Black Willow, 30" Dia / #592-Goodding's Black Willow, 30.5" Dia / These 7 trees are located within the Stone Beetland development site (P21-042).

These trees will be removed in order to implement the construction of drainage facilities and a park that are 916
proposed with the development.

Clear Form Print Form
07/10/2023
6 6

SRCSD SEWER EASEMENT
20' SEWER FORCE MAIN EASEMENT
LDR-1P-1B-1MDR-1P-2MDR-2HDR-1HDR-2
CMUHDR-3
LDR-2LDR-3
B-2/OSHDR-3
P-3ALBIONWAY

BURLINGTON WAYDEERHAVEN WAY
FUTURE 24TH STREET
FUTURE 24TH STREET

DETROIT /SOUTHGATENEIGHBORHOOD

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOODMESA GRANDENEIGHBORHOODMORRISON CREEK WAY

DELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOODDELTA SHORESNEIGHBORHOOD

CITY OFSACRAMENTOSITE

WESTVILLAGECENTRALVILLAGETRANSITVILLAGE

NORTHVILLAGE

COSUMNES RIVER BOULEVARD

DELTA SHORESCIRCLE SOUTH

A STREETA STREETD STREETC STREETE STREETF STREETG STREETG STREET

RTSTATIONTRANSIT & EASEMENT CORRIDOROS H STREET

ANNARBOR

OSB STREET
5945951592597
599
F:\3377-000\ACAD\EXHIBITS\XB_TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT PLAN.DWGJOB NO.: 3377-000 TREE REMOVAL ANDREPLACEMENT PLANSTONE BEETLANDCITY OF SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO COUNTY CALIFORNIASCALE: 1" = 200'DATE: JULY 10, 2023 6004002000 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSSAN RAMONWWW.CBANDG.COMROSEVILLE(925) 866-0322(916) 788-4456 REPLACEMENT OPTIONS MAY BE ACHIEVED BY ONSITE PLANTING OF NATIVE OAK TREES AS DESCRIBED BELOW OR BYTHE PAYMENT OF IN-LIEU FEES. IF THE PROJECT PROPONENT CHOOSES TO PAY IN-LIEU FEES, THE FEES ARE PAID TOTHE CITY OF SACRAMENTO AND ARE DUE WHEN THE PLANNED PROJECT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THE APPEALPERIOD HAS EXPIRED. AN INVOICE WILL BE MAILED TO THE APPLICANT OF THE TREE PERMIT APPLICATION AROUNDTHE MIDDLE OF THE MONTH FOLLOWING PLANNING PROJECT APPROVAL AND IT IS PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT. IF THEPROJECT PROPONENT CHOOSES TO CONDUCT ONSITE REPLACEMENT PLANTINGS AS MITIGATION, THE FOLLOWINGSPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED. THE ONSITE REPLACEMENT TREES WILL BE PLANTED IN THE PROPOSEDPUBLIC PARK (P-3) AND IN THE PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN PARCEL (B-2). EACH 15-GALLON PLANTING SHALL BEEQUIVALENT TO 1 INCH DSH, EACH 24" BOX PLANTING SHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO 2 DSH, AND EACH 36" BOX OR BIGGERSHALL BE EQUIVALENT TO 3 DSH. EACH NATIVE OAK PLANTING SHALL REQUIRE A MINIMUM PLANTER WIDTH OF SEVENFEET AND A MINIMUM PLANTER LENGTH OF 14-FEET. THE PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLANTED NO LESS THAN 35 FEETAPART AND SHALL BE ADEQUATELY IRRIGATED.

TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN NOTE

Arborist

Report

Stone Beetland

City of Sacramento
,

Sacramento County,

California

16 May

2022

Prepared for:

Clifton Taylor

JP Land Holdings
, LLC.

508 Gibson Drive, Suite 260

Roseville, California 95678

Recommended Citation:

Madrone Ecological Consulting
, LLC

(Madrone). 20
22 .

Arborist

Report
–

Stone Beetland
.

Prepared for

JP
Land Holdings
, LLC.
. Published
16 May

2022
.

Arborist Report

Stone Beetland

16 May

2022

CONTENTS

Arborist

Report

Stone
Beetland

1.0 INTRODUCTION

________________________________
________________________________
______________

1 2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS AND HABITAT

________________________________
_______________

1 2.1 Annual Brome Grasslands

................................
................................
................................
................

1 2.2 Mixed
Riparian
Woodland

................................
................................
................................
...............

1 2.3
Developed

................................
................................
................................
................................
..........

2 3.0 METHODOLOGY

________________________________
________________________________
_____________

2 4.0

RESULTS

________________________________
________________________________
______________________

3 5.0 R

EPLACEMENT PLAN

________________________________
________________________________
________

3 6
.0 REFERENCES

________________________________
________________________________
__________________

4 Tables

Table 1.

Surveyed Trees within the Study Area

................................
................................
................................
.......................

3 Figures

Figure 1.

Vicinity Map

Figure 2.

Tree Inventory Map

Attachments

Attachment A
.

Arborist Survey Data

Arborist Report

Page
1 Stone Beetland

16 May

2022

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report
presents the results of a
n arborist survey

conducted for the
Stone Beetland

Property (Study
Area)

by Madrone Ecological Consulting, LLC (Madrone)

on 21 March 2022
.

The
approximately
127
-
acre

Study Area
is

west of Morrison Creek north of Cosumnes River
Boulevard
, and approximately

1 mile east
of Interstate 5

within

the City of Sacramento, Sacramento County, California. The Study Area is located within Sections

7, 8,
17 and 18
,

Township 7 North
,

Range 5 East (MDB&M)
(
Longitude
-
121.469194,
Latitude 38.466
003
; NAD83) and is portrayed on

the “
Florin, California
” 7.5
-
Minute Series USGS
Topographic Quadrangle (USGS 2018
) (
Figure 1
).

2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS AND HABITAT

According to LiDAR elevation data provided to Sacramento County by Merrick & Company in 2004 and 2007, the Study Area is situated on
relatively flat terrain at elevations ranging from approximately 6 to 18 feet above sea level.

Most of the site is characterized by flat terrain that has been historically leveled, ditched, and drained for agricultural use. The northeastern corner displ
ayed uneven topography due to the presence of several
trash and spoils piles; several “squatter” gardens were located within the Study Area along the northeastern fence line and appear to have been planted by residents from the abutting neighborhood to the

north. An abandoned California Highway Patrol drivers training track is also located to the north of the Study Area and west of the aforementioned neighborhood.

Fallow agricultural lands occupy areas to the south and west, and the eastern boundary borde rs the toe of
a large levee constructed along Morrison Creek. A portion of the Sacramento Regional Transit Light Rail “Blue Line” (Light Rail)
and Light Rail station
parallels the eastern boundary just west of Morrison Creek.

2.1 Annual
Brome Grasslands

The majority of the Study Area historically supported agricultural lands that were partially
impacted
during the construction of the Light Rail and Cosumnes River Boulevard, which started in the early 2010’s.

Since the completion of these p
rojects, approximately 9.31 acres of the site has reverted to annual brome grasslands that are characterized by soft chess (
Bromus hordeaceus
), wild oats (
Avena fatua
), rip
-
gut
brome (
Bromus diandrus
), and perennial rye (
Lolium perenne
)
. Common
herbaceous species include
prickly lettuce (
Lactuca serriola
), yellow star
-
thistle (
Centauria solstitialis
), and alkali mallow (
Malvella
leprosa
).

2.2 Mixed
Riparian

Woodland

Approximately 0.46 acre of mixed riparian woodland comprised of small stands of sandbar willow (
Salix
exigua
) and a scattered mix of escaped non
-
native fruit/ornamental species flank the east bank of

Arborist Report

Page
2 Stone Beetland

16 May

2022

Morrison Creek. This area also includes poison oak (
Toxicodendron diversilobum
), edible fig (
Ficus carica
),
and Himalayan blac
kberry (
Rubus armeniacus
)
.

This area appears to have burned in 2021.

2.3 Developed

Approximately 2.73 acres of developed lands were mapped within the Study Area. Developed lands refer to constructed, heavily

graded, and/or
heavily compacted features such as the

Light Rail
line and its base
and overpass, levee access roads, a gravel staging area, and the portions of the levee within the Study Area adjacent to Morrison Creek
. Vegetation, if present, is typically sparse or ruderal and includ
es

stinkwort (
Dittrichia graveolens
), Russian thistle (
Salsola tragus
), tumbleweed amaranth (
Amaranthus
albus
), pigweed amaranth (
A. blitoides
), rough cocklebur (
Xanthium strumarium
), wild

radish (
Raphanus
sativus
), milk thistle (
Silybum marianum
), bindweed (
Convolvulus arvensis
), black mustard (
Brassica nigra
),
and broad leaf filaree (
Erodium botrys
).

There are
several non
-
native ornamental tree plantings located
along the landscaped margin
on the north side of
Cosumnes

River Boulevard.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

Madrone

ISA Certified

A
rborist Daria Snider

(#WE
-
8666A)

conducted the arborist survey with assistance
from Madrone senior biologist

Dustin Brown

on 21 March 2022
. The survey was conducted in accordance
with the
Sacramento
City

Code Section 12.56

on
tree planting, maintenance, and conservation.

Prior to the s
urvey
Madrone queried the City of Sacramento database of City Trees to determine whether any City

or Private Protected

Trees were within the Study Area.

A City Tree means any tree which, when
the trunk is measured, measure
d

four and one
-
half feet above gro
und, is partially or completely located in
a City park, on the City’s property, or on a public right -
of
-
way (i.e., any street, road, sidewalk, park, alley,
etc.). The Sacramento City Code defines a “Private Protected Tree” as follows:

A.

A tree that is design
ated by city council resolution to have special

historical value, special
environmental value, or significant community

benefit, and is located on private property;

B.

Any native Valley Oak (
Quercus lobata
), Blue Oak (
Quercus douglasii
),

Interior Live Oak (
Quercus
wislizenii
), Coast Live Oak (
Quercus agrifolia
),

California Buckeye (
Aesculus californica
), or
California Sycamore

(
Platanus racemosa
), that has a
Diameter at Standard Height (
DSH
)

of 12
inches or more, and is located

on private property;

C.

A tree th
at has a DSH of 24 inches or more located on private property

that:

1. I
s an undeveloped lot; or

2. D
oes not include any single unit or duplex dwellings; or

3. A tree that has a DSH of 32 inches or more located on private property

that includes any
single unit or d
uplex dwellings.

As part of this inventory all native trees with a DSH of 12 inches or more and any tree with a DSH of 24 inches or more were
surveyed.

Arborist Report

Page
3 Stone Beetland

16 May

2022

For each tree surveyed, Ms. Snider recorded the tree identification number, tree species, D S
H,
approximate dripline radius, and general health and structure.

A
luminum tag
s

with a unique identification
number
were
nailed into the trunk

of each surveyed tree
. Th
e location of each tree was recorded
with a
GPS unit capable of sub
-
meter accuracy (
EOS Tools Arrow
100
).

4.0 RESULTS

A total of
three

native

trees with a
DSH
greater than
12 inches
were inventoried within the
Study Area
.

The data

are summarized in Table 1 and
a map of
the inventoried trees
is included as
Figure 2
.

Table 1. Surveyed Trees within the Study Area

Species

Number of
Trees

(DSH)

Trees in Poor
Health

(DSH)

Trees in Fair
Health

(DSH)

Trees in Good
Health

(DSH)

Interior live oak
(
Quercus
wislizeni
i
)

1 (

12.5 )

1 (12.5)

V
alley oak

(
Quercus lobata
)

1 (

19.5 )

1 (

19.5 )

Northern California black walnut

(
Juglans hindsii
)

1 (
41 )

1 (
41 )

Total

3 (
73 )

1 (

12.5 )

1 (
41 )

1 (

19.5 )

One
tree

(Tree 597)

was

burned in a fire in 2021

an
d

appears to have almost died and is resprouting mid
-
way up the trunk and from the base.

5.0 REPLACEMENT PLAN

A total of
three

trees
will be remove
d by the Project including

one interior live oak (tree

597), one
Northern California black walnut
(tree 599), and one Valley oak (tree 600).

Of these
three

trees, only
the
two
native

oak trees

(trees 597 and 600)

qualify as Private Protected trees
.

Tree 597 is in poor
health due
to being burned
severely

in a fire in
2021 and
do
es not require
replacement mitigation for removal. Thus,
tree 600 is the only tree planned for removal that
will require replacement mitigation.

Replacement options may be achieved by onsite planting of 20 DSH of native oak trees

as described
below

or by the payment of in
-
lieu fees equal to $325 per inch or $
6,500
.

If the project proponent
chooses to pay in
-
lieu fees
, t
he fees are
paid to the City of Sacramento and are due when the plann ed

project has been approved and the appeal period has expired. An invoice will be mailed to the applicant of the tree permit application around the middle of the month following planning project app roval and it
is payable upon receipt.

If the project proponent chooses to conduct onsite replacement plantings as mitigation,

the following specifications shall be followed. Each 15 -
gallon planting shall be equivalent to 1
inch DSH, each 24” box planting s
hall be equivalent to 2 DSH, and each 36” box or bigger shall be equivalent to 3 DSH. Each native oak planting shall require a minimum planter width of seven feet and a
minimum planter length of 14
-
feet. The planting
s

shall be planted no less than 35 feet
apart and shall be
adequately irrigated.

Arborist Report

Page
4 Stone Beetland

16 May

2022

6 .0

REFERENCES

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 201
8 .
“
Florin
, California”

7.5 -
Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. U. S.

Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado.

Figures

Figure 1.

Vicinity Map

Figure 2. Tree
Inventory Map

1718
0807
13 12
2019
0506
24 01
09 16
04 21
Figure 1
Site and Vicinity
Stone Beetland
Sacramento County, California
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
C:\Madrone\Stone Beetland - 20088\Maps\MXDs\MXDs_ARD\Figure_1_Vicinity_StoneBeetland.mxd 12/29/2020, 12:39:45 PM Study Area Boundary (127 acres)
Source: United States Geologic Survey, 2018.
"Florin, California" 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle Sections 7-8, and 17-18, Township 7 North, Range 5 East Longitude -121.469194, Latitude 38.466003
West
Sacramento
Davis
Sacramento
0 25,000 50,000
Feet
Site
Vicinity
±
Site
£¤99
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
§¨¦80
£¤99
§¨¦80 £¤50
§¨¦80
Study Area
!
(
!
(
!
(
6 0
0 5
9 9
5 9
7 A
e
r
i
a
l

S
o
u
r
c
e
:

M
a
x
a
r
,

4 M
a
r
c
h

2 0
2 1
±
0 1
5 0
3 0
0 F
e
e
t
F
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
M
a
d
r
o
n
e
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
S
t
o
n
e

B
e
e
t
l
a
n
d
\
M
X
D
s
_
A
R
B
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
_
2 _
T
r
e
e
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
_
S
t
o
n
e
B
e
e
t
l
a
n
d
_
A
R
B
.
m
x
d
,

A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d

U
s
e
r
,

4 /
2 1
/
2 0
2 2
,

1 4
:
1 9
F
i
g
u
r
e

2 T
r
e
e

I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y

S
R
C
S
D

P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
S
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
S
t
u
d
y

A
r
e
a

B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y

(
1 2
7 a
c
r
e
s
)
!
(
I
m
p
a
c
t
e
d

T
r
e
e
D
r
i
p

L
i
n
e

R
a
d
i
u
s
C
o
n
s
u
m
n
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
D
e
l
t
a
S
h
o
r
e
s
C
i
r
c
l
e
S
o
u
t
h
M
o
r
r
i
s
o
n
C
r
e
e
k
T
r
e
e

N
u
m
b
e
r
C
o
m
m
o
n

N
a
m
e
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
i
c

N
a
m
e
D
r
i
p

L
i
n
e

R
a
d
i
u
s

(
f
t
)
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
H
e
a
l
t
h
5 9
7 I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

l
i
v
e

o
a
k
Q
u
e
r
c
u
s

w
i
s
l
i
z
e
n
i
5 P
o
o
r
P
o
o
r
5 9
9 N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a

b
l
a
c
k

w
a
l
n
u
t
J
u
g
l
a
n
s

h
i
n
d
s
i
i

2 2
P
o
o
r
F
a
i
r
6 0
0 V
a
l
l
e
y

o
a
k
Q
u
e
r
c
u
s

l
o
b
a
t
a
DBH
1 2.5
13 5

13 5

14 0
.

,

.

,

.

19.5 2
3 G
o
o
d
G
o
o
d
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

T
r
e
e

I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y

Attachments

Attachment A
:

Arborist Survey Data

Attachment A

Arborist Survey Data

Tree
Number
Common Name
Scientific Name
DBH
Drip Line
Radius (ft)
Structure
Health
Notes
597
Interior live oak
Quercus wislizeni

12.5 5
Poor
Poor
nearly died in fire; one sprout in canopy
and stump sprouts, dead drip line is 10'
599
Northern California black walnut
Juglans hindsii

13.5, 13.5, 14.0
22 Poor
Fair
600
Valley oak
Quercus lobata

19.5 23
Good
Good
Stone Beetland Arborist Survey Data

Arborist

Report

SRCSD Property

City of Sacramento
,

Sacramento County,

California

16 May

2022

Prepared for:

Clifton Taylor

JP Land Holdings
, LLC.

508 Gibson Drive, Suite 260

Roseville, California 95678

Recommended Citation:

Madrone Ecological Consulting
, LLC

(Madrone). 20
22 .

Arborist

Report
–

SRCSD Property
.

Prepared for

JP
Land Holdings
, LLC.
. Published
16 May

2022
.

Arborist
Report

SRCSD Property

16 May

2022

CONTENTS

Arborist

Report

SRCSD
Property

1.0 INTRODUCTION

________________________________
________________________________
______________

1 2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS AND HABITAT

________________________________
_______________

1 2.1 Annual Brome Grasslands

................................
................................
................................
................

1 2.2 Mixed
Riparian
Woodland

................................
................................
................................
...............

1 2.3
Developed

................................
................................
................................
................................
..........

2 3.0 METHODOLOGY

________________________________
________________________________
_____________

2 4.0

RESULTS

________________________________
________________________________
______________________

3 5.0 R

EPLACEMENT PLAN

________________________________
________________________________
________

3 6
.0 REFERENCES

________________________________
________________________________
__________________

4 Tables

Table 1.

Surveyed Trees within the Study Area

................................
................................
................................
.......................

3 Figures

Figure 1.

Vicinity Map

Figure 2.

Tree Inventory Map

Figure 3.

Impacts to Aquatic Resources and

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities

Attachments

Attachment A
.

Arborist Survey Data

Arborist Report

Page
1 SRCSD Property

16 May

2022

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a
n arborist survey

conducted for the
Sacramento County Sanitation
District (SRCSD) Property (Study Area)

by Madrone Ecological Consulting, LLC (Madrone)

on 21 March
2022
.

The
approximately 1

4.55 -
acre

Study Area
is

west of the confluence of Morrison and Beacon Creeks
north of Cosumnes River Boulevard within

the City of Sacramento, Sacramento County, California. The Study Area is located within Sections 17

and 18
,

Township 7 North
,

Range 5 East (MDB&M)
(
Longitude
-
121.469194, Latitude 38.466003
; NAD83) and is portrayed on

the “
Florin, California
” 7.5
-
Minute S
eries
USGS Topographic Quadrangle (USGS 2018
) (
Figure 1
).

2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS AND HABITAT

According to LiDAR elevation data provided to Sacramento County by Merrick & Company in 2004 and 2007, the Study Area is situated on relatively flat terrain

at elevations ranging from approximately 4 to 20
feet above mean sea level.

Most of the site is characterized by flat terrain that has been historically leveled, ditched, and drained for agricultural use. Fallow lands occupy areas to the north, south, and west, and the eastern boundary
parallels a reach of Morrison Creek. Morrison Creek, which merges with a reach of Beacon Creek near the southernmost portion of the Study Area, generally flows from north to south and is bracketed by large levees on both
sides.

The Sacramento Regional Transit Light Rail “Blue Line” (Light Rail) bisects the east half of the parcel along an approximate north
-
south axis, and the recently
-
opened (29 August 2021) Morrison Creek Light Rail
station is situated to the north.

2.1 Annual Brome Grasslands

The majority of the Study Area historically supported agricultural lands that were heavily impacted during the construction of the Light Rail and Cosumnes River Boulevard, which started in the early 2010’s. Since the completion of

these projects, approximately 9.31 acres of the site has reverted to annual brome grasslands that are characterized by soft chess (
Bromus hordeaceus
), wild oats (
Avena fatua
), rip
-
gut
brome (
Bromus diandrus
), and perennial rye (
Lolium perenne
) (
Figure 3
).

Common herbaceous species
include prickly lettuce (
Lactuca serriola
), yellow star
-
thistle (
Centauria solstitialis
), and alkali mallow
(
Malvella leprosa
).

2.2 Mixed
Riparian

Woodland

Approximately 0.46 acre of mixed riparian woodland comprised of small stands of sandbar willow (
Salix
exigua
) and a scattered mix of escaped non
-
native fruit/ornamental species flank the east bank of
Morrison Creek. This area also includes poison oak (
Toxicodendron diversilobum
), edible fig (
Ficus carica
),

Arborist Report

Page
2 SRCSD Property

16 May

2022

and
Himalayan blackberry (
Rubus armeniacus
) (
Figure 3
). A well
-
developed homeless encampment is
present in this area.

2.3 Developed

Approximately 2.73 acres of developed lands were mapped within the Study Area. Developed lands refer to constructed, heavily

g
raded, and/or heavily compacted features such as the

Light Rail
line and its base
and overpass, levee access roads, a gravel staging area, and the portions of the levee within the Study Area adjacent to Morrison Creek (
Figure
3 ). Vegetation, if present, is typically sparse or ruderal and includ
es

stinkwort (
Dittrichia graveolens
), Russian thistle (
Salsola tragus
), tumbleweed amaranth
(
Amaranthus albus
), pigweed amaranth (
A. blitoides
), rough cocklebur (
Xanthium strumarium
), wild

radish
(
Raphanus
sativus
), milk thistle (
Silybum marianum
), bindweed (
Convolvulus arvensis
), black mustard
(
Brassica nigra
), and broad leaf filaree (
Erodium botrys
).

3.0 METHODOLOGY

Madrone

ISA Certified

A
rborist Daria Snider

(#WE
-
8666A)

conducted the arborist survey with assistance
from Madrone senior biologist

Dustin Brown

on 21 March 2022
. The survey was conducted in accordance
with the
Sacramento
City

Code Section 12.56

on
tree planting, maintenance, and conservation.

Prior to the s
urvey
Madrone queried the City of Sacramento database of City Trees to determine whether any City

or Private Protected

Trees were within the Study Area.

A City Tree means any tree which, when
the trunk is measured, measure
d

four and one
-
half feet above gro
und, is partially or completely located in
a City park, on the City’s property, or on a public right -
of
-
way (i.e., any street, road, sidewalk, park, alley,
etc.). The Sacramento City Code defines a “Private Protected Tree” as follows:

A.

A tree that is design
ated by city council resolution to have special

historical value, special
environmental value, or significant community

benefit, and is located on private property;

B.

Any native Valley Oak (
Quercus lobata
), Blue Oak (
Quercus douglasii
),

Interior Live Oak (
Quercus
wislizenii
), Coast Live Oak (
Quercus agrifolia
),

California Buckeye (
Aesculus californica
), or
California Sycamore

(
Platanus racemosa
), that has a
Diameter at Standard Height (
DSH
)

of 12
inches or more, and is located

on private property;

C.

A tree th
at has a DSH of 24 inches or more located on private property

that:

1. I
s an undeveloped lot; or

2. D
oes not include any single unit or duplex dwellings; or

3. A tree that has a DSH of 32 inches or more located on private property

that includes any
single unit or d
uplex dwellings.

As part of this inventory all native trees with a DSH of 12 inches or more and any tree with a DSH of 24 inches or more were
surveyed.

For each tree surveyed, Ms. Snider recorded the tree identification number, tree species, D S
H,
approximate dripline radius, and general health and structure.

A
luminum tag
s

with a unique identification

Arborist Report

Page
3 SRCSD Property

16 May

2022

number
were
nailed into the trunk

of each surveyed tree
with the exception of one inaccessible tree

(#1)
.

The location of each tree was recorded
with a GPS unit capable of sub
-
meter accuracy (
EOS Tools Arrow
100
).

In
one
case, dense
poison oak p
recluded access to the
tree trunk
. In
this case
,
no tag was attached
to the tree,
and
the DBH
and physical location
was estimated
.

The survey did not
include trees on the eastern banks of Morrison Creek as no impacts are proposed for that are
a, and the creek is not passable on foot.

4.0 RESULTS

A total of
seven native

trees with a
DSH
greater than
12 inches
were inventoried within the
Study Area
.

The data

are summarized in Table 1 and
a map of
the inventoried trees
is included as
Figure 2
.

Table 1. Surveyed Trees within the Study Area

Species

Number of
Trees

(DSH)

Trees in Poor
Health

(DSH)

Trees in Fair
Health

(DSH)

Trees in Good
Health

(DSH)

Interior live oak
(
Quercus
wislizeni
i
)

2 (
28 )

2 (28)

Boxelder (
Acer negundo
)

2 (73)

2 (73)

Goodding’s black willow (
Salix gooddingii
)

2 (111.5)

1 (30)

1 (81.5)

Northern California black walnut (
Juglans
hindsii
)

1 (55)

1 (55)

Total

7 (280)

1 (30)

4 (164.5)

2 (73)

Several of the trees were
burned in a fire in 2021. Tree 597 appears to have almost died and is resprouting mid
-
way up the trunk and from the base. Tree 1, a large Goodding’s

black willow is mostly dead and has
many cavities.

5.0 REPLACEMENT PLAN

A total of
four
trees
will be removed by the Project including two Goodding’s black willow trees (Trees 1 and 592) and two interior live oak trees (Trees 594 and 595).

Of these four tr
ees, only
the two interior live
oak trees qualify as Private Protected trees totaling 28 DSH

and require replacement.

Replacement options may be achieved by onsite planting of 28 DSH of native oak trees

as described
below

or by the payment of in
-
lieu fee
s equal to $325 per inch or $9,100
.

If the project proponent
chooses to pay in
-
lieu fees
, t
he fees are paid to the City of Sacramento and are due when the plann ed

project has been approved and the appeal period has expired. An invoice will be mailed to the applicant of the tree permit application around the middle of the month following planning project approval and it is payable upon receipt.

If the project propon
ent chooses to conduct onsite replacement plantings as
mitigation,

the following specifications shall be followed. Each 15 -
gallon planting shall be equivalent to 1
inch DSH, each 24” box planting shall be equivalent to 2 DSH, and each 36” box or bigger sha ll be
equivalent to 3 DSH. Each native oak planting shall require a minimum planter width of seven feet and a

Arborist Report

Page
4 SRCSD Property

16 May

2022

minimum planter length of 14
-
feet. The planting
s

shall be planted no less than 35 feet apart and shall be adequately irrigated.

6 .0

REFERENCES

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 201
8 .
“
Florin
, California”

7.5 -
Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle. U. S.

Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado.

Figures

Figure 1.

Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Tree Inventory Map
Figure 3. Impacts to Aquatic Resources and

Terrestrial Vegetation Communities
7 8
18 17
19 20
Figure 1
Site and Vicinity

SRCSD Property
Sacramento County, California
Source: United States Geologic Survey, 2018
"Florin, California" 7.5-Minute Topographic Quadrangle
Sections 17-18, Township 7 North, Range 5 East, MDB&M
Longitude -121.462845, Latitude 38.4629216
±
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Study Area (15 acres)
F:\Projects\Madrone\Projects\SRCSD Property\Maps\MXDs_ARB\Figure_1_SiteVicinity_SRCSD.mxd, Authorized User, 4/15/2022, 11:55 Sacramento
Davis
Site
0 24,000 48,000
Feet
Site
Vicinity
§¨¦80
UV99
§¨¦5
UV99
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
590
592
594
595
2417
2416
1 Aerial Source: Maxar, 4 March 2021
±
0 150 300
Feet
F:\Projects\Madrone\Projects\SRCSD Property\Maps\MXDs_ARB\Figure_2_TreeInventory_SRCSD_ARB.mxd, Authorized User, 4/21/2022, 13:36 Figure 2
Tree Inventory

SRCSD Property
Sacramento County, California
Study Area Boundary (15 acres)
Impact Area
!( Tree
!( Impacted Tree
Drip Line Radius
Consumnes River Boulevard
Morrison
Creek
Tree Number Common Name Scientific Name DBH Drip Line Radius (ft) Structure Health 1 Goodding's black willow Salix gooddingii 30 18 Poor Poor 590 Northern California black walnut Juglans hindsii 10.5, 6.0, 10.5, 7.5, 12.0, 8.5 30 Good Good 592 Goodding's black willow Salix gooddingii 15.0, 16.0, 20.0, 30.5 35 Good Fair 594 Interior live oak Quercus wislizeni 10.0, 5.5 16 Good Fair 595 Interior live oak Quercus wislizeni 12.5 15 Fair Fair 2416 Boxelder Acer negundo 13.5, 6.0, 7.0, 12.5 28 Fair Good 2417 Boxelder Acer negundo 14.0, 7.0, 13.0 25 Fair Good Existing Tree Inventory
A
e
r
i
a
l

S
o
u
r
c
e
:

S
a
c

R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l

G
I
S

C
o
o
p
,

2 6

M
a
r
c
h

2 0
1 8
±
0 1
5 0
3 0
0 F
e
e
t
D
:
\
1 A
A
A
A
A

-

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
0 0
0 0
0 1

-

M
a
t
t
s

F
i
l
e
\
M
a
p
s
\
S
t
o
n
e
_
B
e
e
t
l
a
n
d
\
A
A
A
A
_
B
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
\
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
_
m
a
p
s
_
f
o
r
_
B
R
A
\
M
X
D
s
_
B
R
A
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
_
7 _
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
_
S
R
C
S
D
.
m
x
d
,

M
H
i
r
k
a
l
a
,

1 /
1 2
/
2 0
2 2
,

8 :
1 0

Figure

Impacts

to

Aquatic

Resources

and
Terrestrial

Vegetation

Communities

S
R
C
S
D

P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
S
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,

S
a
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o

C
o
u
n
t
y
,

C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
I
m
p
a
c
t

A
r
e
a
S
t
u
d
y

A
r
e
a

B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
T
e
r
r
e
s
t
r
i
a
l

V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n

C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s

(
1 2
.
5 0

a
c
r
e
s
)
I
m
p
a
c
t
e
d
A
n
n
u
a
l

B
r
o
m
e

G
r
a
s
s
l
a
n
d

(
5 .
7 4

a
c
r
e
s
)
A
v
o
i
d
e
d
A
n
n
u
a
l

B
r
o
m
e

G
r
a
s
s
l
a
n
d

(
3 .
5 7

a
c
r
e
s
)
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d

(
2 .
7 3

a
c
r
e
s
)
M
i
x
e
d

R
i
p
a
r
i
a
n

W
o
o
d
l
a
n
d

(
0 .
4 6

a
c
r
e
)
A
q
u
a
t
i
c

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s

(
2 .
0 5

a
c
r
e
s
)
I
m
p
a
c
t
e
d

O
t
h
e
r

W
a
t
e
r
s
E
p
h
e
m
e
r
a
l

D
i
t
c
h

(
0 .
0 5

a
c
r
e
)
I
n
t
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
n
t

D
i
t
c
h

(
0 .
0 1

a
c
r
e
)
A
v
o
i
d
e
d

W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
S
e
a
s
o
n
a
l

W
e
t
l
a
n
d

(
0 .
1 5

a
c
r
e
)
A
v
o
i
d
e
d

O
t
h
e
r

W
a
t
e
r
s
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

-

B
e
a
c
o
n

C
r
e
e
k

(
0 .
0 6

a
c
r
e
)
P
e
r
e
n
n
i
a
l

D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e

-

M
o
r
r
i
s
o
n

C
r
e
e
k

(
1 .
7 8

a
c
r
e
s
)
C
o
n
s
u
m
n
e
s
R
i
v
e
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
M
o
r
r
i
s
o
n
C
r
e
e
k
B
e
a
c
o
n

C
r
e
e
k
3 Attachments

Attachment A
:

Arborist Survey Data

Attachment A

Arborist Survey Data

Tree
Number
Common Name
Scientific Name
DBH
Drip Line
Radius (ft)
Structure
Health
Notes
1 Goodding's black willow
Salix gooddingii

30.0 18
Poor
Poor
Much of tree is dead, large
cavaties at base
590
Northern California black walnut
Juglans hindsii

10.5, 6.0, 10.5, 7.5, 12.0, 8.5
30 Good
Good
592
Goodding's black willow
Salix gooddingii

15.0, 16.0, 20.0, 30.5
35 Good
Fair
594
Interior live oak
Quercus wislizeni

10.0, 5.5
16 Good
Fair
595
Interior live oak
Quercus wislizeni

12.5 15
Fair
Fair
2416
Boxelder
Acer negundo

13.5, 6.0, 7.0, 12.5
28 Fair
Good
lower bark shredding and
missing in areas
2417
Boxelder
Acer negundo

14.0, 7.0, 13.0
25 Fair
Good
lower bark missing on one trunk
SRCSD Property Arborist Survey Data
Confusion
RESOLUTION NO. 2023–
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
October 10, 2023

APPROVAL OF WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT FOR THE STONE BEETLAND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (P21-042)

BACKGROUND
A. State law (Water Code Section 10910) requires a water supply and demand analysis (Water Supply Assessment) for development projects of a certain size or type, which would include the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development, based on the City's Urban Water Management Plan.

B. The Water Supply Assessment evaluates projected water supplies, determined to be available by the city for the project during normal, single dry and multiple dry years over a 20-year period. The city prepared the Water Supply Assessment for the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Project.

C. On July 27, 2023, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development project and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to adopt the entitlements for this project.

D. On October 10, 2023, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010 and 17.812.030, and considered the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assesment, and received and considered evidence concerning the entitlements for the project.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Water Supply Assessment for the proposed Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Project, and attached hereto as Exhibit A, is approved.

Section 2. Exhibit A is part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A – Water Supply Assessment for Stone Beetland Planned Unit Development Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on October 10, 2023, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:
1 Last update: December 8, 2021
City of Sacramento
SB 610/SB 221 Water Supply Assessment and Certification Form This form may be used to complete water supply assessments for projects located in an area covered by the City’s most recent Urban Water Management Plan.

Note: Please do not use this form if the projected water demand for your project area was not included in the City’s latest Urban Water Management Plan. To review the City’s Urban Water Management Plan, please visit:
https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Utilities/Reports
Project:

Date:

Project Applicant (Name of Company):

Applicant Contact (Name of Individual):

Phone Number:

E-mail:

Address:
_____________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant to fill in the following:

1. Does the project include:

Type of Development Yes No
A proposed residential development of 500 or more dwelling units A shopping Center employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet?
A Commercial Office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet?
A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor area A mixed use project that includes one or more of the projects specified above
A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the water required by a 500 dwelling unit project 2 If the answer is no to all of the above, a water supply assessment is not required for the project.

2. Is the projected water demand for the project location included in the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, adopted June 29, 2021?
Yes: No:

If
the answer is no, you cannot use this form. Please refer to the requirements of SB 610 for preparing a water supply assessment.

3. Pl
ease fill in the project demands below:

Type of
Development
Land Use
Category
Demand Factor Proposed Development Current Zoning
Residential
Water Use
Factor,
afy/dwelling
unit
Non-
Residential
Water Use
Factor,
afy/employee
Number
Dwelling
Units
Number
Employees
Total
Demand
Number
Dwelling
Units
Number
Employees
Total
Demand
Residential - Low
Rural Residential
(RR)
Suburban
Neighborhood Low
Density (SNLD)
Traditional
Neighborhood Low
Density (TLDR)
Residential -
Medium
Suburban
Neighborhood
Medium Density
(SMDR)
Urban
Neighborhood Low
Density (ULDR)
Residential - High
Suburban
Neighborhood
High Density
(SHDR)
Traditional
Neighborhood
Medium Density
(TMDR)
Urban
Neighborhood
Medium Density
(UMDR)
Traditional
Neighborhood
High Density
(THDR)
Mixed Use
Employment
Center Mid Rise
(ECMR)
Suburban Center
(SCnt)
Suburban Corridor
(Scor)
Traditional Center
(TCnt)
3 Mixed
Use - Higher
Density
Urban Center High
(UCntHigh)
Urban Center Low
(UcntLow)
Urban Corridor
High (UCorHigh)
Urban Corridor
Low (UCorLow)
Central Business
District
Central Business
District (CBD)
Urban
Neighborhood
High Density
(UHDR)
Commercial
Regional
Commercial (RC)
Employment
Center Low Rise
(ECLR)
Industrial Industrial (IND)
Public Public/Quasi-
Public (PUB)
Park Parks and
Recreation (PRK)
Open Space Open Space (OS)
Other
Other
Other
Total Demand
(AFY)

4. R
equired Elements of Water Supply Assessment (Water Code § 10910) A. W
ater supply entitlements, water rights or water service contracts ( Water Code § 10910(d)):
4 The City’s water supply entitlements, water rights and water service contract are identified and discussed in the Urban Water Management Plan, Chapters 3, 6, and 7.

All infrastructure necessary to deliver a w
ater supply to the project is in
place, excepting any distribution facilities required to be constructed and financed by the project applicant: Yes: No:

B. Identification of other sources of water supply if no water has been received under City’s existing entitlements, water rights or water service contracts (Water Code § 10910(e)):

Not applicable.

C. Information
and analysis pertaining to groundwater supply (Water Code § 10910(f)):

Addressed by Urban Water Management P
lan, Chapters
3, 6, and 7.

Verification of Water Supply
(for residential development of more than 500 dwelling units) Based on the City’s most recent Urban Water Management P lan, are there sufficient
water supplies for the project during normal, single dry and multiple dry years over a 20 year period?
Yes: No:

By:

Title:

Date:

This box to be filled in by the City
Distribution:

Applicant
Development Services Department (Org:
4913) – Assigned Planner:_____________
Utilities Department (Org: 3334) - Development Review (Tony Bertrand) Utilities Department (Org: 3332) - Capital Improvements (Brett Ewart)

Detroit Community Association

January 3, 2022
Angel Anguiano, Assistant Planner
City of Sacramento Community Development Department
300 Richards Blvd., 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811

Re: Project File Number P21-042 (Stone Beetland)

Dear Mr. Anguiano:

Thank you for routing the developer’s application for their Stone Beetland development located just south of our Detroit community. We are pleased to see new and diverse housing options, including transit-oriented development, in the pipeline.

In the application, the developer submitted plans for our community to provide a direct vehicle and pedestrian connection between Cosumnes River Boulevard and Meadowview Road. This would be achieved by connecting Stone Beetland at Detroit Boulevard, our main thoroughfare, and Ann Arbor Way. For over six decades, our community has always been closed to through traffic as it is one-way in, one-way out. With this new connection, especially to Cosumnes River Boulevard where there is a high amount of traffic, it not only means major change for us, but it may also introduce new traffic to our community that we are not familiar with and may not be prepared for. While we are pleased the developer listened to community concerns of increased traffic as a result of these new connections, we still hold reservations and would like further exploration and analysis on what impacts these new connections have.

We have the following recommendations:

1. Developer, City and Detroit neighborhood to further explore and analyze impacts of new vehicle and pedestrian connections to the Detroit neighborhood

2. Developer and City to be transparent and continue actively engaging the Detroit neighborhood on general development, traffic impacts, and changes to the application/plan

3. Explore traffic mitigation measures, including new traffic calming such as bulb-outs, stop signs, speed lumps, and lighted crosswalks both in Detroit and Stone Beetland

4. Prohibit construction vehicles in the Detroit neighborhood, unless when absolutely necessary on a limited basis, and in such cases provide street cleaning and repair when necessary, including following all Sac Metro Air District rules and regulations

5. Explore construction of larger park in North Village due to lack of City-owned park in the Detroit neighborhood
We look forward to working with the City and applicant on our recommendations.

Sincerely,
Charlotte Coron, Co-Chair, Detroit Community Association Larry Lee, Co-Chair, Detroit Community Association
Margarita Chavez, Co-Chair, Detroit Community Association

909 12th Street, Suite 125, Sacramento, CA 95814
916-446-9255 • www.civicthread.org

June 20, 2023 VIA EMAIL
Angel Anguiano, Associate Planner
Community Development Department
300 Richards Blvd., 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
RE: Stone Beetland (P21-042) Cycle 5

Dear Angel:

Thank you for providing Civic Thread the opportunity to comment on the 5th Cycle of plans put forth for Stone Beetland. The project is planned as a mixed-use community and transit priority project
In review of the latest developments, Civic Thread would like to offer the following comments:

Staff would like to commend the developers on the improved mobility network, specifically as it pertains to the additional Class I trails and Class II bike lanes along ‘Future 24th Street’ and ‘A Street’. These improvements will ensure a complete and comfortable internal network that will ideally facilitate increased walking and biking as a means of travel. We strongly recommend that developers coordinate with the developers of Delta Shores concerning the continuation of pedestrian and bike networks, particularly along ‘A Street’.

In addition to our highlight of the improved mobility network, we would like to offer the following recommendations which we feel will enhance the livability and quality of life particularly as it relates to the project serving as a ‘transit priority project.’ Civic Thread recommends providing or at minimum, clarifying, why developers cannot provide pedestrian access to all units along ‘A Street’ leading up to the park. Further, LDR2 and LDR3 plans indicate attached sidewalks to be utilized citing the desire to continue the existing conditions to the north. We recommend implementing separated sidewalks so as to create a more pleasant and user-friendly experience for pedestrians who may