Sacramento City Council
June 18, 2024

City of Sacramento
City Council - 2PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2024-01137 6/18/2024 Consent Item 15.

Supplemental Agreement: Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility Study (T15235000) File ID: 2024-01137
Location: American River from Sequoia Pacific Boulevard at Richards Boulevard, District 4, Represented by Mayor Steinberg; Truxel Road at Garden Highway, District 3, Represented by Mayor Pro Tem Talamantes
Recommendation: Pass a Motion: 1) authorizing the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to City Agreement No. 2023-0700 with Dokken Engineering in an amount not to exceed $30,998, for a new total not-to-exceed amount of $630,598; and 2) resetting the City Manager’s authority to issue supplemental agreements for City Agreement No. 2023-0700.

Contact: Fedolia “Sparky” Harris, Principal Planner, (916) 808-2996, [email protected]; Lucinda Willcox, Assistant Director, (916) 808-5052, [email protected]; Department of Public Works
Presenter: None.

Attachments:

1. Description/Analysis

2. Supplemental Agreement No. 2
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: A bridge over the American River at Truxel Road is a critical multi-mode mobility link to improve regional connections, as further described in the “Rationale for Recommendations” section of this report. The bridge has been part of City and regional plans for many years.

In 2021, the City, in partnership with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) and Sacramento Regional Transit (RT), applied for and was successful in receiving a Caltrans Sustainability Grant for a Feasibility Study for this project (Resolution 2021-0323). The City executed a subrecipient agreement with SACOG (C2022-1491) and the City is managing the project.

On June 27, 2023, the City entered into an agreement with Dokken Engineering for $558,668 (C2023

File ID: 2024-01137 6/18/2024 Consent Item 15.
-0700) to conduct a comprehensive engineering feasibility study to move the project closer to construction by identifying constraints, analyzing the traffic impacts of feasible alignments, analyzing the hydraulic impacts of feasible alignments, determining necessary right-of-way, and developing preliminary cost estimates for budgeting and future grant cycles. Supplemental agreement C2023- 0700-01 was approved on April 29, 2024, to increase the budget by $40,932 for additional scope tasks associated with traffic analysis.

Supplemental Agreement No. 2 is being sought to increase the budget by $30,998 for additional tasks associated with preparing a Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant application for the Project Approval and Environmental Documentation phase of the Truxel Bridge Project. City Council approval is needed because this supplemental agreement will cause the post- award changes to exceed the City Manager’s authority.

Policy Considerations: The Truxel Bridge is included in the 2040 General Plan and the regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility Study will help advance City General Plan goals and key policies of promoting safety and enhancing livability, sustainability, and economic vitality. The recommendation supports a plan to make investments to foster a transportation system that improves the health of Sacramento residents through actions that make active transportation, non-motorized modes, high-occupancy, and zero-emission vehicles viable, attractive alternatives to automobiles that use internal combustion engines (2040 General Plan Policy M-1.3). The recommendation supports the City’s efforts to increase bicycling and walking citywide so that it can meet its equity, reduced vehicle miles traveled, and sustainability goals (2040 General Plan Policy M-1.11). The recommendation supports the City’s work to increase transit ridership citywide (2040 General Plan Policy M-1.22). The recommendation supports the City’s efforts to maintain existing bridges and plan and seek funding for new bridges, when appropriate, to improve multimodal connectivity and provide for emergency evacuation routes (2040 General Plan Policy M-

5.3).

Economic Impacts: None.

Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): Entering into a professional services agreement for the Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility Study is not subject to the provisions of CEQA under sections 15060(c)(3) and 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) the creation of government funding mechanisms or other governmental fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment is not a project. The subject activity involves only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the City has not approved, adopted, or funded.

File ID: 2024-01137 6/18/2024 Consent Item 15.

Appropriate CEQA review and documentation will take place prior to approval of project development.

Sustainability: Transportation is responsible for 57% of Sacramento’s local greenhouse gas emissions, the single largest sector. Providing safe multi-modal transportation alternatives helps to reduce single-occupant vehicle use and contributes towards Sacramento’s climate change goals.

This feasibility study furthers the City’s commitment to sustainability by laying the groundwork to significantly reduce the use of fossil fuels, encourage less driving, reduce dependence on private automobiles, and support expansion of bicycle, pedestrian, and public transit access.

Commission/Committee Action: None.

Rationale for Recommendation: Construction of the Truxel Bridge is a key first step in extending transit service to South and North Natomas, either through ultimate light rail service or through bus service or bus rapid transit (BRT). It is also needed for bicycle and pedestrian access between South Natomas and the River District, and to provide additional evacuation routes and emergency response options for the area. Currently, all access across the American River for this area is via freeways (I-5 or SR160). Completion of the environmental document and preliminary engineering is a critical step in positioning the project for construction funding. The TIRCP program is well suited to address this need.

As the consultant conducting the Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility Study, Dokken Engineering is best positioned to prepare the TIRCP Grant application under City staff direction.

Financial Considerations: There is sufficient funding in the Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility Study (T15235000) to execute a Supplemental Agreement for an amount not to exceed $30,998 with Dokken Engineering for a total contract amount of $630,598 and complete the complete the revised scope.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Dokken Engineering is not an LBE but has partnered with two LBE’s, AIM and Fehr & Peers, for this contract to meet the minimum LBE requirement. AIM will provide 14% of the services. Fehr & Peers will provide 6.8% of the services.

110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200 Folsom, CA 95630Tele: 916 858-0642 Fax: 916 858-0643 www.dokkenengineering.com April 2, 2024 Mr. Fedolia HarrisCity of SacramentoDepartment of Transportation915 I Street, Room 2000Sacramento, CA 95814RE: Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyPN T152350000; PO 0000071514Request for Supplemental Agreement No. 2Dear Mr. Harris: Dokken Engineering is requesting Supplemental Agreement No. 2 for the following reasons:To amend our contract amount for the addition of scope in Task 5 as presented in Attachment 1. The totalamount of the supplement is $30,997.92 for Dokken Engineering.To add Drago Vantage, LLC. to the project team.To reallocate some of AIM’s ($12,726.71) and Dokken’s ($2,966.51) budget to Sabrina Drago (DragoVantage, LLC.).A breakdown of the requested supplement is provided in Attachment 2 and the updated Task, Budget, and Billing Summary is included as Attachment 3. Drago Vantage’s 10H form is provided as Attachment 4. No changes have been made to Dokken’s 10H form. We appreciate your consideration of this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (916) 858-0642.Sincerely,DOKKEN ENGINEERING Pamela Dalcin-Walling, PEProject ManagerAttachments: 1 – Scope of Work 2 – Updated Cost Summary: Dokken, AIM, Drago Vantage, Total 3 – Updated Task Budget and Billing Summary4 – 10H Form: Drago Vantage, Inc.

Scope of Services TASK 5.0 FUNDING STRATEGY 5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant ApplicationDokken will meet with the City to discuss the TIRCP grant application objectives and components. Meetings may be in person, over Teams, and ad hoc, designed to advance the TIRCP application to success. Research and data collection will occur to develop strong narratives and demonstrate the necessity and benefits of the Truxel Bridge Project. Dokken will utilize data provided by Fehr & Peers to define how Project components improve air quality and advance transit-oriented development/sustainable communities goals. Data collection will also include research around community demographics including disadvantaged communities. Dokken will create a timeline that includes Project phases and milestones with associated cost estimates for each. A cost benefit analysis will be developed to demonstrate the impacts of the Project. Other funding sources will be described along with the TIRCP funding request. Dokken will develop maps and exhibits to provide context and illustrate the importance of Project features.Dokken will prepare the grant application in accordance with the 2024 TIRCP Guidelines. A cover letter, the application elements, maps and exhibits, and letters of support will be designed to meet the evaluation criteria. Dokken will provide the City with an application timeline to ensure time for review and for the City to have all application elements ready for submittal before the due date. Deliverables: Project benefit analysis; maps and exhibits; complete grant application package OH + Fringe Profit167.87% 10.00% Actual Base Hourly Rate $ 89.00 $ 120.00 $ 84.00 $ 80.00 $ 56.00 $ 52.00 $ 49.00 $ 33.00 TASK 1.0 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT1.1 Meetings and Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.2 Progress Reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.3 Project Schedule Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.4 Project Administration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.5 Quality Control/QMP Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 1 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 2.0 – SURVEY2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthophotography Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 2 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 3.0 – PUBLIC OUTREACH3.1 Community Engagement Plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.3 Website Content Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.4 Collateral Material Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.6 Community Conversations Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.7 Community Meetings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 3 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 4.0 – PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS4.1 Field Exploration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2 Traffic Analysis Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.1 Forecasts and Operations Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.2 Model Noise Reduction Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.3 VMT Reduction Analysis Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.4 Transit Ridership Forecast Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.4 Hydraulic Analysis Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.5 Environmental Documentation Memo Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.6 Utility Investigation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.7 ROW Delineation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.8 Constructability Assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.9 Conceptual Bridge Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Movable Bridge - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.10 Geometric Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.11 Cost Estimate Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.12 30% Conceptual Drawings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 4 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 5.0 – FUNDING STRATEGY5.1 Research and Identify Funding Sources Hours -2 -2 -10.5 -14.5 $ (1,006.77) $ (1,690.06) $ (269.68) $ (2,966.51)5.2 Funding Strategy Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant ApplicationHours 18 8 2 8 105 8 8 14 171 $ 10,520.00 $ 17,659.92 $ 2,817.99 $ 30,997.92 Task 5 Subtotal 16 6 2 8 94.5 8 8 14 156.5 9,513.23 15,969.87 2,548.31 28,031.41 TASK 6.0 – FEASIBILITY STUDY6.1 Draft Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.2 Comment Summary Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.3 Final Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.4 City Council Meeting Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 6 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 - - - - Total 16 6 2 8 94.5 8 8 14 156.5 $ 9,513.23 $ 15,969.87 $ 2,548.31 $ 28,031.41 Other Direct CostsODC Subtotal $ - Grand Total $ 28,031.41 Environmental Planner 2Total CostLabor Costs HoursSubtotal Senior Environmental Planner 1Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyTASK DESCRIPTIONDOKKEN ENGINEERINGStaff Name and or ClassificationPamela Dalcin-Walling Project ManagerJuann Ramos Roadway Project EngineerRob Burns Structures Project EngineerSarah Holm Environmental LeadChris Aguirre Funding / Outreach LeadAssociate Engineer 1 OH + Fringe Profit140.60% 10.00% Actual Base Hourly Rate $ 68.49 $ 57.99 $ 83.07 TASK 1.0 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT1.1 Meetings and Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.2 Progress Reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.3 Project Schedule Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.4 Project Administration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.5 Quality Control/QMP Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 1 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 2.0 – SURVEY2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthophotography Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 2 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 3.0 – PUBLIC OUTREACH3.1 Community Engagement Plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.3 Website Content Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.4 Collateral Material Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.6 Community Conversations Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.7 Community Meetings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 3 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 4.0 – PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS4.1 Field Exploration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2 Traffic Analysis Hours 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.1 Forecasts and Operations4.2.2 Model Noise Reduction4.2.3 VMT Reduction Analysis4.2.4 Transit Ridership Forecast Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.4 Hydraulic Analysis Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.5 Environmental Documentation Memo Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.6 Utility Investigation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.7 ROW Delineation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.8 Constructability Assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.9 Conceptual Bridge Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Movable Bridge - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.10 Geometric Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.11 Cost Estimate Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.12 30% Conceptual Drawings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 4 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 5.0 – FUNDING STRATEGY5.1 Research and Identify Funding Sources Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5.2 Funding Strategy Hours -57.9 -57.9 $ (4,808.70) $ (6,761.03) $ (1,156.97) $ (12,726.71)5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant ApplicationHours 0.0 $ - $ - $ - $ -Task 5 Subtotal 0 0 0 -57.9 -57.9 (4,808.70) (6,761.03) (1,156.97) (12,726.71)TASK 6.0 – FEASIBILITY STUDY6.1 Draft Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.2 Comment Summary Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.3 Final Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.4 City Council Meeting Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 6 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 - - - - Total 0 0 -57.9 -57.9 $ (4,808.70) $ (6,761.03) $ (1,156.97) $ (12,726.71)Total w/ Optional Tasks 0 0 -57.9 -57.9 $ (4,808.70) $ (6,761.03) $ (1,156.97) $ (12,726.71)Other Direct CostsODC Subtotal $ - Grand Total $ (12,726.71)Grand Total w/ Optional Tasks $ (12,726.71) Total CostLabor Costs HoursSubtotal Celia McAdamsStrategic AdvisorTruxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyTASK DESCRIPTIONAIM CONSULTINGKatie DeMaioProject ManagerGladys CornellProject OversightStaff Name and or ClassificationAttachment 2b OH + Fringe Profit120.00% 10.00%Actual BaseHourly Rate $ 136.50 $ 52.15 TASK 1.0 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT1.1 Meetings and Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.2 Progress Reports Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.3 Project Schedule Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.4 Project Administration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.5 Quality Control/QMP Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 1 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 2.0 – SURVEY2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthophotography Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 2 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 3.0 – PUBLIC OUTREACH3.1 Community Engagement Plan Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.3 Website Content Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.4 Collateral Material Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.6 Community Conversations Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.7 Community Meetings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 3 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 4.0 – PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS4.1 Field Exploration Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2 Traffic Analysis Hours 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.1 Forecasts and Operations Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.2 Model Noise Reduction Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.3 VMT Reduction Analysis Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.4 Transit Ridership Forecast Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.4 Hydraulic Analysis Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.5 Environmental Documentation Memo Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.6 Utility Investigation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.7 ROW Delineation Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.8 Constructability Assessment Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.9 Conceptual Bridge Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Movable Bridge - OPTIONAL Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.10 Geometric Alternatives Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.11 Cost Estimate Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.12 30% Conceptual Drawings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 4 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 - - - - TASK 5.0 – FUNDING STRATEGY5.1 Research and Identify Funding Sources Hours 14 40 54 $ 3,997.00 $ 4,796.40 $ 879.34 $ 9,672.74 5.2 Funding Strategy Hours 6 32 38 $ 2,487.80 $ 2,985.36 $ 547.32 $ 6,020.48 5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant ApplicationHours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 5 Subtotal 0 20 72 92 6,484.80 7,781.76 1,426.66 15,693.22 TASK 6.0 – FEASIBILITY STUDY6.1 Draft Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.2 Comment Summary Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.3 Final Study Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.4 City Council Meeting Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 6 Subtotal 0 0 0 - - - - Total 20 72 92 $ 6,484.80 $ 7,781.76 $ 1,426.66 $ 15,693.22 Total w/ Optional Tasks 20 72 92 $ 6,484.80 $ 7,781.76 $ 1,426.66 $ 15,693.22 Other Direct CostsODC Subtotal $ - Grand Total $ 15,693.22 Grand Total w/ Optional Tasks $ 15,693.22 HoursSubtotal Labor Costs Total CostTruxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyTASK DESCRIPTIONDRAGO VANTAGEStaff Name and or ClassificationSabrina DragoManagerPhil WrightTransportation PlannerAttachment 2c TASK DESCRIPTIONDOKKEN ENGINEERINGAIM CONSULTING FEHR & PEERSGEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC.HARDESTY & HANOVERUNICO ENGINEERINGDRAGO VANTAGETOTALTASK 1.0 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT1.1 Meetings and Coordination $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.2 Progress Reports $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.3 Project Schedule $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.4 Project Administration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1.5 Quality Control/QMP $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 1 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TASK 2.0 – SURVEY2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - OPTIONAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthophotography $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 2 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TASK 3.0 – PUBLIC OUTREACH3.1 Community Engagement Plan $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.3 Website Content $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.4 Collateral Material $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.6 Community Conversations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 3.7 Community Meetings $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 3 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TASK 4.0 – PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS4.1 Field Exploration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2 Traffic Analysis $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.1 Forecasts and Operations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.2 Model Noise Reduction $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.3 VMT Reduction Analysis $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.2.4 Transit Ridership Forecast $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.4 Hydraulic Analysis $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.5 Environmental Documentation Memo $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.6 Utility Investigation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.7 ROW Delineation $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.8 Constructability Assessment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.9 Conceptual Bridge Alternatives $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Movable Bridge - OPTIONAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.10 Geometric Alternatives $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.11 Cost Estimate $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4.12 30% Conceptual Drawings $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 4 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TASK 5.0 – FUNDING STRATEGY5.1 Research and Identify Funding Sources $ (2,966.51) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,672.74 $ 6,706.23 5.2 Funding Strategy $ - $ (12,726.71) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,020.48 $ (6,706.23)5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant Application $ 30,997.92 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,997.92 Task 5 Subtotal $ 28,031.41 $ (12,726.71) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,693.22 $ 30,997.92 TASK 6.0 – FEASIBILITY STUDY6.1 Draft Study $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.2 Comment Summary $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.3 Final Study $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 6.4 City Council Meeting $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 6 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $ 28,031.41 $ (12,726.71) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,693.22 $ 30,997.92 Other Direct CostsODC Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total $ 28,031.41 $ (12,726.71) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,693.22 $ 30,997.92 Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyAttachment 2d Fedolia "Sparky" HarrisCity of SacramentoDepartment of Public Works915 I Street, Room 2000 Re: Truxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudySacramento, CA 95814-2604PO No. 0000071514Attn: Fedolia "Sparky" Harris Invoice No. Original Contract Amount 558,667.94Supplemental Agreement No. 1 40,931.21Supplemental Agreement No. 230,997.92Total Contract Amount630,597.07COSTS TOTAL PERCENTPHASE TASK ORIGINAL REALLOCATED PREVIOUSLY BILLED COSTS BALANCE BILLEDNO. NO. PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET BILLED THIS PERIOD TO DATE REMAINING BUDGETTASK 1.0 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT100 001 TK 1.1 Meetings and Coordination 23,242.56 11,743.46 1,546.93 13,290.39 9,952.17 57% 57%100 002 TK 1.2 Project Administration5,244.89 917.84 393.36 1,311.20 3,933.69 25% 25%100 003 TK 1.3 Project Schedule2,622.45 1,048.96 131.12 1,180.08 1,442.37 45% 45%100 004 TK 1.4 Project Admiinsrtation5,244.89 1,573.44 917.84 2,491.28 2,753.61 47% 47%100 005 TK 1.5 Quality Control/QMP9,016.50 1,180.08 262.24 1,442.32 7,574.18 16% 16%SUBTOTAL PHASE 145,371.28 0.00 16,463.78 3,251.49 19,715.27 25,656.02 43% 43%TASK 2.0 - SURVEY200 001 TK 2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - Optional0.00 0.00 0.00200 002 TK 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthop1,644.18 1,323.01 1,323.01 321.17 80% 80%SUBTOTAL PHASE 21,644.18 0.00 1,323.01 0.00 1,323.01 321.17 80% 80%TASK 3.0 - PUBLIC OUTREACH300 001 TK 3.1 Community Engagement Plan854.50 839.17 839.17 15.33 98% 98%300 002 TK 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination19,470.91 9,687.46 1,048.96 10,736.42 8,734.49 55% 55%300 003 TK 3.3 Website Content854.51 852.28 852.28 2.23 100% 100%300 004 TK 3.4 Collateral Material854.51 852.28 852.28 2.23 100% 100%300 005 TK 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events4,349.14 4,326.96 4,326.96 22.18 99% 99%300 006 TK 3.6 Community Conversations6,264.41 6,229.02 6,229.02 35.39 99% 99%300 007 TK 3.7 Community Meetings13,601.37 601.11 131.12 732.23 12,869.14 5% 5%SUBTOTAL PHASE 346,249.36 0.00 23,388.28 1,180.08 24,568.36 21,680.99 53% 53%TASK 4.0 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS400 001 TK 4.1 Field Exploration3,547.66 1,543.98 1,543.98 2,003.68 44% 44%400 002 TK 4.2 Traffic Analysis4,001.45 -4,001.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%400 000 TK 4.2.1 Forecasts and Operations1,938.84 4,001.45 0.00 0.00 5,940.29 0% 0%400 000 TK 4.2.2 Model Noise Reduction0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%400 000 TK 4.2.3 VMT Reduction Analysis0.00 707.18 0.00 0.00 707.18 0% 0%400 000 TK 4.2.4 Transit Ridership Forecast0.00 707.18 0.00 0.00 707.18 0% 0%400 003 TK 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report2,469.23 0.00 0.00 2,469.23 0% 0%400 004 TK 4.4 Hydraulic Analysis15,528.42 1,337.71 1,337.71 14,190.71 9% 9%400 005 TK 4.5 Environmental Documentation Memo46,673.67 17,112.51 1,980.13 19,092.64 27,581.03 41% 41%400 006 TK 4.6 Utility Investigation4,101.63 0.00 0.00 4,101.63 0% 0%400 007 TK 4.7 ROW Delineation4,101.63 0.00 0.00 4,101.63 0% 0%400 008 TK 4.8 Constructability Assessment16,105.95 0.00 0.00 16,105.95 0% 0%400 009 TK 4.9 Conceptual Bridge Alternatives52,832.00 14,541.36 2,475.13 17,016.49 35,815.51 32% 32%400 000 Movable Bridge - Optional0.00 0.00 0.00400 010 TK 4.10 Geometric Alternatives20,737.96 20,693.53 20,693.53 44.43 100% 100%400 300 TK 4.11 Cost Estimate15,993.98 707.18 707.18 15,286.80 4% 4%400 012 TK 4.12 30% Conceptual Drawings34,657.56 15,280.95 1,075.49 16,356.44 18,301.12 47% 47%SUBTOTAL PHASE 4222,689.97 1,414.36 71,217.22 5,530.75 76,747.97 147,356.37 34% 34%TASK 5.0 - FUNDING STRATEGY500 001 TK 5.1 Research and Identify Funding Sources5,103.46-2,966.51 0.00 0.00 2,136.95 0% 0%500 002 TK 5.2 Funding Strategy3,783.40 0.00 0.00 3,783.40 0% 0%500 003TK 5.3 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) Grant Application0.00 30,997.92 0.00 0.00 30,997.92 0% 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 58,886.86 28,031.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,918.27 0% 0%TASK 6.0 - FEASIBILITY STUDY600 001 TK 6.1 Draft Study16,901.53 0.00 0.00 16,901.53 0% 0%600 002 TK 6.2 Comment Summary10,230.49 0.00 0.00 10,230.49 0% 0%600 003 TK 6.3 Final Study10,984.81 0.00 0.00 10,984.81 0% 0%600 004 TK 6.4 City Council Meeting6,741.75 0.00 0.00 6,741.75 0% 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 644,858.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,858.58 0% 0% TASK, BUDGET, AND BILLING SUMMARYEstimated Task Completion PercentageAttachment 3

COSTS TOTAL PERCENTPHASE TASK ORIGINAL REALLOCATED PREVIOUSLY BILLED COSTS BALANCE BILLEDNO. NO. PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET BILLED THIS PERIOD TO DATE REMAINING BUDGETEstimated Task Completion PercentageTASK 7 - OTHER DIRECT COSTS700 001 Dokken - Other Direct Costs12,700.00 0.00 0.00 12,700.00 0% 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 712,700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,700.00 0% 0%TOTAL PRIME CONSULTANT382,400.24 29,445.77 112,392.29 9,962.32 122,354.61 289,491.40 32% 32%COSTS TOTAL PERCENTPHASE TASK ORIGINAL REALLOCATED PREVIOUSLY BILLED COSTS BALANCE BILLEDNO. NO. PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET BUDGET BILLED THIS PERIOD TO DATE REMAINING BUDGETSUBCONSULTANTSSUBCONSULTANT SERVICES300 001 AIM - TK 3.1 Community Engagement Plan3,075.75 3,064.80 3,064.80 10.95 100% 100%300 002 AIM - TK 3.2 Stakeholder Coordination4,786.91 4,786.91 4,786.91 0.00 100% 100%300 003 AIM - TK 3.3 Website Content3,129.92 2,902.99 217.27 3,120.26 9.66 100% 100%300 004 AIM - TK 3.4 Collateral Material3,876.98 3,676.23 3,676.23 200.75 95% 95%300 005 AIM - TK 3.5 Pop Ups and Tabling Events12,530.99 10,880.76 10,880.76 1,650.23 87% 87%300 006 AIM - TK 3.6 Community Conversations13,043.40 11,393.62 1,257.73 12,651.35 392.05 97% 97%300 007 AIM - TK 3.7 Community Meetings21,705.88 8,762.92 2,165.12 10,928.04 10,777.84 50% 50%300 002 AIM - TK 5.2 Funding Strategy15,389.71-12,726.712,663.00 2,663.000.00 100% 100%300 008 AIM - Other Direct Costs3,300.00 2,013.65 2,013.65 1,286.35 61% 61%Subtotal Subconsultant - AIM Consulting80,839.53-12,726.7150,144.88 3,640.12 53,785.00 14,327.82 67% 67%400 002 Fehr & Peers - TK 4.2 Traffic Analysis36,368.94 -36,368.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 0%400 000 Fehr & Peers - Forecasts and Operations9,775.57 36,368.94 0.00 0.00 46,144.51 0% 0%400 000 Fehr & Peers - Model Noise Reduction0.00 14,881.75 0.00 0.00 14,881.75 0% 0%400 000 Fehr & Peers - VMT Reduction Analysis0.00 9,753.36 0.00 0.00 9,753.36 0% 0%400 000 Fehr & Peers - Transit Ridership Forecast0.00 14,881.75 0.00 0.00 14,881.75 0% 0%400 003 Fehr & Peers - Other Direct Costs2,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0% 0%Subtotal Subconsultant - Fehr & Peers48,144.52 39,516.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 87,661.38 0% 0%400 003 Geocon - TK 4.3 Preliminary Foundation Report14,493.93 0.00 0.00 14,493.93 0% 0%Subtotal Subconsultant - Geocon14,493.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,493.93 0% 0%400 000 Hardesty & Hannover - Movable Bridge - Optional0.00 0.00 0.00 0%Subtotal Subconsultant - Hardesty & Hanover0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00200 001UNICO - TK 2.1 Horizontal/Vertical Control - Optional 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%200 002TK 2.2 Photogrammetric Aerial Mapping & Orthophotogr6,599.72 6,591.86 6,591.86 7.86 100% 100%200 003UNICO - Other Direct Costs 26,190.00 26,190.00 26,190.00 0.00 100% 100%Subtotal Subconsultant - UNICO32,789.72 0.00 32,781.86 0.00 32,781.86 7.86 100% 100%500 002 Drago Vantage - Funding Strategy0.00 15,693.22 0.00 0.00 15,693.22 0% 0%Subtotal Subconsultant - Drago Vantage0.00 15,693.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,693.22TOTAL SUBCONSULTANT176,267.70 42,483.37 82,926.74 3,640.12 86,566.86 132,184.21 40% 40%GRAND TOTAL SERVICES 558,667.94 71,929.14 195,319.03 13,602.44 208,921.47 421,675.61 33% 33% Estimated Task Completion Percentage

Drago Vantage LLCDate:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %0.00% 120.00% 120.00%Profit %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing RateXManager Sabrina Drago $136.50 $330.33 $330.33Transportation Planner Phil Wright $52.15 $126.20 $126.20$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Description RateTotal-$-$-$-$-$-$-$TOTAL -$ CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMTruxel Bridge Concept & Feasibility StudyT152350000CONTRACTOR Name:Original4/19/2024Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):Estimated ODC Budgets Shall Be Included in Cost Proposal.By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.Sabrina Drago1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actualbase hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursedbased on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. Forstaff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates fornew employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal.The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an"X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition ofnew staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shallcommence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similarclassification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY ProjectManager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shallapprove any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on currentDepartment of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, basehourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the termof the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior writtenapproval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employeesper prevailing wage guidelines.7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any perdiem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wideallocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.Other Direct Costs (ODC) Items and Rates

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Version: FEBRUARY 9, 2023Page1 of 2
Attachment 4
Previously approved 10-H form(s) enclosed for reference only

Fehr & PeersDate:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %80.17% 102.65% 182.82%Profit %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing RateXPrincipal - Project Manager Ron Milam $1.00 $$XPrincipal - Project Engineer Adrian Engel $7$$2Principal - Project Engineer Kwasi Donkor $$#$Sr. Associate - Operations Engineer Dave Stanek $$2$2Sr. Engineer/Planner - Modeler or VisCOM Adrita Islam $5$104 $104Sr. Business Services Adminstrator - Project AdministratorJoLynn Souto $4$1$1Administrative $28.85 $89.75 $89.75Sr Engineer/Planner David Manciati $54.81 $170.52 $170.52Sr. Engineering Technician $52.88 $164.51 $164.51Engineer/Planner $37.50 $116.66 $116.66Associate $64.90 $201.91 $201.91Intern $31.50 $98.00 $98.00Technician $31.25 $97.22 $97.22$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Description RateTotalMobile Device/Traffic Count Data 2,000.00$ -$-$-$-$-$-$TOTAL 2,000.00$ By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.Ronald T. Milam, AICP, PTP1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staffnot listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shallapprove any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A 4/15/2024Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMTruxel Bridge Concept and Feasibility StudyT15235000CONTRACTOR Name:

Version: FEBRUARY 9, 2023Page1 of 1