CITY COUNCIL
Darrell Steinberg, Mayor
Lisa Kaplan, District 1
Shoun Thao, District 2
Karina Talamantes, Mayor Pro Tem, District 3
Katie Valenzuela, District 4
Caity Maple, Vice Mayor, District 5
Eric Guerra, District 6
Rick Jennings, II, District 7
Mai Vang, District 8
CHARTER OFFICERS
Mindy Cuppy, City Clerk
Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney
Farishta Ahrary, Interim City Auditor
Howard Chan, City Manager
John Colville, City Treasurer
City Council
Financing Authority
Housing Authority
Public Financing Authority
Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency
City Hall Complex
915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Published by the Office of the City Clerk
(916) 808-7200
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Description: Attached is supplemental material received after publishing the agenda, the addition of attachment 6.
For the Mee
ting of: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 at 5:00 p.m.
Agenda I
tem: Discussion Item 2
4. Sacram
ento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan 2023/24-2028/29 File ID: 20
24-01544
Locat
ion: Citywide
Rec
ommendation: Pass a Motion: 1) accepting the Sacramento Children’s Fund Planning and Oversight Commission’s Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan 2023/24- 2028/29 (“Draft SIP”); and 2) adopt the Draft SIP, including staff’s proposed recommendations as set forth in this staff report.
Conta
ct: Jackie Beecham, Director, (916) 808-1041,
[email protected], Department of Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment (YPCE)
City of Sacramento Page 1
City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2024-01544 9/24/2024 Discussion Item 2.
Sacramento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan 2023/24-2028/29 File ID: 2024-01544
Location: Citywide
Recommendation: Pass a Motion: 1) accepting the Sacramento Children’s Fund Planning and Oversight Commission’s Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan 2023/24-2028/29 (“Draft SIP”); and 2) adopt the Draft SIP, including staff’s proposed recommendations as set forth in this staff report.
Contact: Jackie Beecham, Director, (916) 808-1041, [email protected], Department of Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment (YPCE)
Presenter: Jackie Beecham, Director, (916) 808-1041, [email protected], Department of Youth, Parks, and Community Enrichment (YPCE) Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Sacramento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) 2023/24-2028/29 3-City Auditor’s Baseline Funding Calculation for the Sacramento Children’s Fund 4-Sacramento Children’s Fund FAQs
5-Section §120 Article IX of the Sacramento City Charter 6-Reponse to Council’s September 10, 2024, Questions -TBD Description/Analysis
Issue Detail:
As required by §120 of the Sacramento City Charter (Measure L), the Sacramento Children’s Fund Planning and Oversight Commission (SCF Commission), in collaboration with the Sacramento Youth Commission, presented a Five-Year (July 1, 2023 - June 30, 2029) Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) (Attachment 2).
The SIP included recommendations related to strategies for programming, funding allocations, fund management, and public accountability. Based on feedback and direction provided by Council on September 10, 2024, staff is recommending the following components be included in the final SIP to be adopted by Council:
File ID: 2024-01544 9/24/2024 Discussion Item 2.
o Guaranteed income grants: Staff recommends that at least 20% of each grant cycle be dedicated to support one or more grantees to provide guaranteed cash transfer programming for current or former foster youth ages 18-24. o Open grants: Staff recommends the remaining grant cycle funding be awarded to a mix of proposals providing program strategies that address the five fund goal areas. The SCF grant proposals must be assessed through the City’s competitive RFP and proposal selection process to ensure they are consistent with §120 of the Sacramento City Charter. o Allocations by Grantee Type:
Staff recommends that remaining funding be allocated
through the open, transparent, and competitive process as outlined above to organizations that can best serve the City’s youth consistent with the funding goals outlined in the measure.
o Priority Neighborhoods: Staff recommends that funds primarily serve youth in neighborhoods with the lowest levels of equity and/or the lowest levels of opportunity for children, as demonstrated by but not limited to the following tools: The Child Opportunity Index (COI) (prioritizing programs serving youth in neighborhoods with "very low" child opportunity) or the Sacramento Equity Explore Design (SEED) tool.
Policy Considerations: Section § 120, Article IX of the Sacramento City Charter.
Economic Impacts: Not applicable.
Environmental Considerations: The adoption of the SIP is exempt from environmental review as the SIP is an administrative activity. It is not a project that will have a significant impact on the environment, as defined in sections 15061(b)(3) and 15064 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 Cal.
Code Reg. 15000 et seq.). Projects funded by SCF grants that may have an impact on the environment will comply with CEQA, to the extent required.
Sustainability: Not applicable.
Commission/Committee Action: On August 22, 2024, The SCF Commission passed a motion recommending The SIP FY2023/24-2028/29 to the City Council for adoption.
Rationale for Recommendation: Per the Measure, the SCF Commission develops and submits a Five-Year SIP to the City Council. Based on Council feedback, staff is proposing specified components be included in the SIP for final adoption to best serve the City’s youth. The adopted plan may be amended from time to time by the City Council.
Financial Considerations: Not applicable.
Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable
File ID: 2024-01544 9/24/2024 Discussion Item 2.
Background: In November of 2022, Sacramento voters approved Measure L, establishing the Sacramento Children’s Fund (SCF), requiring the City to spend the equivalent of 40% of its local cannabis tax revenues (CBOT) on child and youth services. The Sacramento Children’s Fund chief purpose is to support positive youth development and youth violence prevention programs - such as services for homeless youth and foster children; mental health counseling; substance-abuse treatment, prevention, and early intervention; and after-school activities - for children and youth less than 25 years old.
Measure L established a nine-member Planning and Oversight Commission tasked with the development of a Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan and review of performance and evaluation reports. The first Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan covers the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029; subsequent plans cover succeeding five-year periods.
Measure L funded programs will prioritize children and youth most impacted by poverty, violence and trauma. These funds may only be used to engage qualified organizations to provide youth services in accordance with the current council adopted Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan, plus allowable administrative costs. The City shall select qualified organizations to receive Sacramento Children’s Fund money based on an open, transparent, and competitive process, consistent with the Citywide Grant Distribution Policy and the requirements of Measure L.
Measure L outlined five main fund goals: 1) Prevent and reduce child and youth homelessness 2) Support the mental and emotional health of children and youth 3) Prevent youth violence 4) Prevent and reduce youth substance abuse 5) Support the healthy development of children ages 0 to 5.
Attachment 6: Response to Council’s September 10, 2024, Questions Target Population
Per the measure, the Sacramento Children’s Fund (SCF) target population is Sacramento youth and children under the age of 25 most impacted by poverty, trauma, and violence.
1. How are at risk or opportunity youth served by the SCF identified? The SCF Planning and Oversight Commission’s Five-year Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) recommends identifying the target population using the following criteria:
• Most Impacted Populations:
Children, youth, and families in the City of Sacramento who are most impacted by poverty, trauma, and violence, such as:
▪ Children, youth, and families who are low-income
▪ Children, youth, and families who are Black, Indigenous, Latino/e, Southeast Asian
▪ Youth or families who are unhoused
▪ Children and youth who identify as LGBTQ+
▪ Youth in or transitioning out of foster care
▪ Youth who are not in school or working
▪ Children and youth who have been involved in the juvenile or criminal legal systems
▪ Children and youth who are first generation immigrants or refugees ▪ Children and youth with disabilities
• Underserved youth defined as those children, youth, and families that are not otherwise connected to programs or services.
• Youth residing in the opportunity areas identified by the Sacramento Equity Explore Design (SEED) Tool or Child Opportunity Index (COI) (as a priority and not a requirement).
1 See Page 27 in the Strategic Investment Plan
2. How will applicants to the fund be assessed for their ability to serve the target population?
Applicants applying for funding will be required to demonstrate their ability to serve the identified target population per the Request for Proposals. This may include narrative and data of past programming and performance. Applications for program funding will be scored on their ability to effectively demonstrate their aptitude in serving the target population, as well as other criteria.
3. How will program participants from the target populations be identified? Grant applicants may have various criteria for identifying program participants, based on the specifics of their grant programs. But typically, program participants from the target population may be identified through the following mechanisms:
• Participant recruitment through collaboration with existing program models designed to serve specific populations (i.e., diversion programming for juvenile justice involved youth, homeless services, foster youth, etc.). Often these models work on a referral basis.
• Participant intake forms or surveys that collect self-reported risk factors including 2 but not limited to the following:
▪ Demographics
▪ Income level
▪ Housing status
▪ School status
▪ Juvenile justice involvement
▪ Foster care status
• Other potential indicators found in the Sacramento Children’s Research Report include:
▪ Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)
▪ Exposure to Community Violence
See Page 21 of the Sacramento Children’s Fund Research Report
4. What projects or programs are eligible to apply/receive funding? Measure L requires that funding allocated to the Sacramento Children’s Fund be used to provide “youth services” in accordance with an adopted Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan. (City Charter, §120 (d).) “Youth Services” are defined as services and programs that support and implement the Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan. Such services include but are not limited to: “(A) Mental health counseling and wellness services; (B) Substance abuse prevention services; (C) Street outreach, violence intervention, and case management; (D) Youth workforce development, including career pathways that advance the city’s climate-action goals; (E) Summer programs and after- school programs; and (F) Early childhood education and family support services.” (City Charter, §120 (a)(16).)
The new Charter provision specifically excludes expenditures that only “incidentally benefit youth,” as well as the “acquisition, lease, or maintenance of any capital item or real property that is not for primary and direct use by youth.” (City Charter, §120 (d)(2).
Funding can be spent on facility maintenance, provided the expenditure: (a) meets the definition of a “youth service”; (b) the facility is primarily and directly used by youth; and (c) it supports and implements the adopted Five-Year Strategic Investment Plan.
5. What is an “open, transparent, competitive process,” for the award of Measure L funding?
Section 120 (d)(3)(A) of the City Charter requires the City to “select qualified organizations to receive Sacramento Children’s Fund money based on an open, transparent, and competitive process, as may be established by the city.” “Qualified organizations” are defined as public entities (including the City) and non- profit corporations exempt from taxation under IRS Code section 501(c)(3). 3 While the Charter does not define the term(s) “open, transparent, competitive process,” in the absence of a definition, we must look to the plain meaning of the language. The generally accepted meaning of competitive grant award process is one that is based on a competitive application process where all applications are scored based on a published set of evaluation criteria.
The City has an established Citywide “Grant Distribution” policy currently used for the award of grant funding. Staff recommends that the City rely on this existing policy for to govern the award of SCF money to qualified organizations, as discussed further below.
Grant Review Team
The City of Sacramento will rely on existing policies and procedures to ensure an open, transparent and competitive process. Please refer to the following policy:
• Grant Distribution: GrantDistribution.pdf (cityofsacramento.gov)
1. How will the Request for Proposals/Funding Applications be developed? SCF staff, working with the City Attorney’s Office, will develop one or more Requests for Proposals/Funding Applications (“RFP”) based on the requirements of the City Charter (Measure L), the adopted Five-Year SIP, and the Citywide Grant Distribution Policy.
Any RFP will include a set of scoring criteria that will be used to evaluate the proposals/applications submitted for SCF grant funding. Additional information on the scoring rubric is provided below.
The RFP will then be published with sufficient time to allow potential grant funding applicants to refine their program(s) and submit their application for funding to the City for evaluation and scoring by a grant review panel.
2. How will the grant review panelists be selected?
Consistent with current City practices, grant review panelists will be chosen for their knowledge, skills, and expertise related to youth programming related to the five fund goals outlined in Measure L. Diversity and inclusion principles will also be considered when selecting panelists.
Eligibility considerations for selecting panelists includes but is not limited to:
• Professionals and experts in the five-fund goal areas; • Persons with lived experience (examples: former foster youth, former justice involved youth, persons who have experienced homelessness); • Youth
• SYC and SCF Commissioners (limited to 2 per funding cycle per SIP) 4 • Professional Public Administrators; and
• Youth advocates
3. How will grant review panelists be vetted for Conflicts of Interest? Panelists will be assessed for conflicts of interest and required to submit a Grant Review Panel Conflict of Interest Form. Any panelist with a prohibited conflict of interest will be disqualified from participating in the grant review panel. Staff will work with the City Attorney’s Office to determine whether potential panelists, including city staff, have any prohibited conflicts of interest.
Panelists will be asked to review applications prior to scoring for any additional potential conflicts and will be reassigned if deemed necessary.
4. Who is eligible to apply for SCF funding?
Per the Citywide Grant Distribution policy, non-profit applicants for SCF grants must meet the following criteria:
- Be registered and in good standing with the California Secretary of State - Be registered and in good standing with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts
Other grantee eligibility requirements may be specified in the RFP.
5. How will the Review Panel score applications?
The grant review panel will score applications utilizing a scoring rubric or matrix and a numerical scoring system developed by City staff. Panelists will receive a grant review guide and attend an orientation outlining the process. Scoring is anonymous and confidential for both applicants and reviewers.
• Panelists will score applications on a secure digital platform, the City of Sacramento grant opportunity portal: Grant Opportunity List (cityofsacramento.gov).
• Panelists evaluate and score each application according to the rubric and its criteria for evaluation. Panelists consider each application on its own merit and do not compare it with other applications.
• Panelists consider only what is specifically written in the application. They do not make assumptions or use any personal knowledge of the applicant. • Panelists review and score applications independently before meeting as a group to discuss and finalize award results.
5 6. What will be included in the Scoring Rubric?
The scoring rubric will be based on the requirements of Measure L and the Sacramento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan. The scoring rubric will include a list of criteria by which panelists will score applications, as well as the maximum points panelists can assign per criteria. Each criterion will be assigned a point value, and not every criteria will have the same point value.
The scoring rubric or matrix is based on Measure L and the strategies and target population recommendations made in the Sacramento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan. The Scoring rubric assessment criteria is also aligned with the application criteria outlined in the RFP. Potential scoring categories could include but are not limited to:
• Will the program primarily serve participants in areas identified by SEED/COI? • Does the proposed program serve Sacramento youth and families most impacted by Poverty Trauma, and Violence?
• Does the proposed program address the Fund Goals outlined in the SIP and the City Charter?
• Does the proposed program address multiple fund goals? • Does the proposed program utilize Evidence Based Practices? • Does the proposed program utilize cross cutting strategies as outlined in the SIP?
• Does the proposed program align with the Citywide Youth Development Plan? Performance Review
The Sacramento Children’s Fund Strategic Investment Plan recommends multi-year grant cycles.
• The first grant cycle will be for 3.5 years, whereby grantees will apply to a competitive RFP for up to three and a half years of funding. Funding will be dispersed annually, contingent upon grantee performance, contract compliance and fund availability.
• The second grant cycle will be for 2 years, whereby grantees will apply to a competitive RFP for up two years of funding. Funding will be dispersed annually, contingent upon grantee performance, contract compliance and fund availability.
1. How will grantee performance be reviewed?
Performance review includes financial and programmatic reporting on an annual if not quarterly basis. Programmatic performance review includes but is not limited to the following:
• Total number of youths, children, and families served • Types of services and programming received
6 • How the program participants have been identified as those that are most impacted by poverty, violence, or trauma; and resident neighborhoods of those being served.
Financial performance review includes but is not limited to the following:
• Adherence to agreement scope and budget
• Timely submission of invoices and requested documentation. • Compliance with City of Sacramento Grant and Procurement and Procedures. ▪ Grant Distribution -
https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/city- government/policies-procedures/GrantDistribution.pdf
▪ Procurement (Professional Services) -
https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/content/dam/portal/city- government/policies-procedures/ProfessionalServicesPolicy.pdf 7 Priority
Council
District Location
Funding
Needed Project Direct Youth Impact
1 2 Johnston Community Park 1,800,000$ Lighting on Softball/ Soccer Field / Add restroom (match $1M grant funds for
field renovations)
Supports activation of sports fields for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe spaces and activities, longer hours of activation. Immediate impact would serve approximately 400+ youth through youth soccer and youth football field permits for practices and games. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence, and supports healthy development of children ages 0 to 5. 2 2 Robertson Community Park 1,000,000$ Convert Wading Pool to Splash Pad Provides expanded season, hours of operation, and increased accessibility to serve youth and families. Ensure the continued operation of an aquatic facility that is facing significant deferred maintenance needs. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence, and supports healthy development of children ages 0 to 5.
3 3 Tanzanite Community Park 800,000$ Add lights to futsal, parking lot and path of travel.
Supports activation of sport courts, longer hours of activation and access to safe facilties. Prevent youth violence.
4 Various Pool/ Wading Pool 500,000$ Resurfacing/ Upgrades Supports continued operation of City pools providing youth aquatic recreation and water safety programs for over 80,000 youth visits annually. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence, and supports healthy development of children ages 0 to 5. 5 Various Youth Sports Field Renovations 500,000$ Turf/ Irrigation Renovations on Sports Fields
Supports activation of sports fields for youth and family recreation programming by providing access to safe spaces with expanded seasons and increased accessibility for more than 70 youth sports organizations and 15,000 youth served annually. Ensures the continued operation of permitting sports fields to youth sports organization with fields that are facing significant deferred maintenance needs. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence, and supports healthy development of children ages 0 to
5. 6
6 Granite Regional Park 1,500,000$ Replace All weather Field, add fencing Supports activation of sports fields and longer hours for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe facilties. Immediate impact to 700 youth that utilize the soccer fields through field permits. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence. 7 5 Pollock Ranch Park 250,000$ Refurbish Basketball court Supports activation of sport court for youth and family recreation, health and wellness and access to safe facilties. Prevents youth violence.
8 8 24th Street Bypass Park 800,000$ New Playground Area Amenity for youth in underresourced neighborhood to continue to promote health and wellness. Prevents youth violence and provides 0-5 support.
9 4 Sutter's Landing Regional Park 750,000$ Skate Park Improvements Supports activation of skate park and youth programming including increasing public access to youth and families. Prevents youth violence.
10 2 Robla Community Park 500,000$ New Community Center Site plans and permitting per park master plan.
Supports youth programming and safe spaces for youth and families. Can include community driven programs including 0-5 support, peer to peer programming, work force development, and violence prevention. Will provide access to safe and consistent spaces and trusted peers and adults. 11 2 Sacramento Softball Complex 750,000$ Replace lighting on Fields 3-4. Supports activation of sports fields and longer hours for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe facilties. Immediate impact to 700 youth that utilize the soccer fields through field permits. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence. 12 6 Granite Regional Park 2,500,000$ Add lift station, and new restroom building
Supports activation of sports fields and longer hours for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe facilties. Immediate impact to 700 youth that utilize the soccer fields through field permits. Prevents youth violence.
13 6 Danny Nunn Park 1,000,000$
Replace Lighting /Field upgrades on
Soccer Field
Supports activation of sports fields and longer hours for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe facilties. Immediate impact to over 200 youth that utilize the fields for rugby and football. Reduces energy costs and supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence. 14 4 O'Neil Park 1,000,000$
Replace Lighting on Soccer Field
Supports activation of sports fields and longer hours for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe facilties. Immediate impact to over 120 youth. Supports mental health and emotional wellness of youth, prevents youth violence.
15 6 Colonial Park 600,000$ Replace restroom to support future conversion of wading pool to splash
pad.
Supports activation of park activities, accessibility, and future conversion of wading pool. Promote health and wellness, prevent youth violence and supports for 0-5.
Unfunded Park and Facility Projects FY 24/25
8 16
7 Z'Berg Park 750,000$ Playground Replacement/ refurbish basketball court
Supports activation of sport court for youth and family recreation, health and wellness and access to safe facilties. Prevent youth violence.
17 5 Argonuat Park 300,000$ Replace Playground Amenity for youth to promote health and wellness, provide early learning opportunities and supports for families. Prevents youth violence and supports for 0-5. 18 4 Bertha Henschel Park 500,000$
Replace Tot Lot and Adventure Playground
Amenity for youth to promote health and wellness, provide early learning opportunities and supports for families. Prevents youth violence and supports for 0-5. 19 7 Sierra 2 Park 250,000$ Playground fencing and Shade Canopies at playground
Supports activation of park activities/playground for youth and families and access to safe spaces and activities.
Prevents youth violence and supports 0-5.
20 6 Lawrence Park 250,000$ Extend Softball Field Fencing Supports activation of park activities/playgorund for youth and families and access to safe spaces and activities.
Prevents youth violence and supports 0-5.
21 7 Lewis Park 300,000$ Playground Replacement Replace amenity for youth to continue to promote health and wellness. Prevents youth violence and provides 0- 5 support.
22 8 Meadowview Park 200,000$ Add shade structure over playground Supports activation of park activities/playground for youth and families and access to safe spaces and activities.
Prevents youth violence and supports 0-5.
23 3 Cove Park 100,000$ Add shade over playstructure Supports activation for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe spaces and activities.
Prevents youth violence and supports for youth ages 0-5. 24 7 Zacharis Park 300,000$ Playground Replacement Replace amenity for youth to continue to promote health and wellness. Prevents youth violence and provide 0- 5 support.
25 7 Z'Berg Park 750,000$ Playground Replacement/ refurbish basketball court
Supports activation of sport court for youth and family recreation, health and wellness and access to safe facilties. Prevents youth violence.
26 6 Earl Warren Park 600,000$ Replace Existing Restroom Supports activation of park activities and skate park. 27 2 Winner's Circle Park 350,000$ Renovate Skate Park Supports activation for youth and family recreation programming and access to safe spaces and activities.
Prevents youth violence.
28 8 North Laguna Community Park 300,000$ Add new Fitness Equipment New amenity for youth to promote health and wellness. Prevents youth violence. 29 4 Sutter's Landing Regional Park 750,000$ BMX/ Pump Track Supports activation of skate park and youth programing including increasing public access to youth and families. Prevents youth violence.
30 4 Olympians Park 2,500,000$
Renovate Crate building in to a
community clubhouse.
Supports youth programming and safe spaces for youth and families. Can include community driven programs including 0-5 support, peer to peer programming, work force development, and violence prevention. Will provide access to safe and consistent spaces and trusted peers and adults. 31 5 Mangan Community Park 3,000,000$ Renovate former gun range into community club house.
Supports youth programming and safe spaces for youth and families. Can include community driven programs including 0-5 support, peer to peer programming, work force development, and violence prevention. Will provide access to safe and consistent spaces and trusted peers and adults.
TOTAL 25,450,000$
Unfunded Park and Facility Projects FY24/25
9 Measure U Supported Programs Program Areas
Approximate
CBO's
Supported
Funding Amount
Fee Waivers/Reduction Program (Fees
Waived/Reduced FY 23/24-Current)
Community center and sports field permit fee
waivers/reductions to ensure access to qualifying
organizations that provide programs and services that
benefit youth and families citywide. Examples of services provided by non-profits and community partners include
but are not limited to neighborhood association meetings, health and wellness resources and programs, social
service referrals, 0-5 child development and childcare, and recreation youth sports leagues and practices.
41 368,722$
YPCE Program Support
YPCE partners with enrichment providers offering youth
and family program supplements including health and
wellness activities, social emotional learning, coping skills, and social services referrals including health care,
housing and access to healthy food. Includes in kind event and program partnership to offer community benefit.
15 65,000$
Youth Development Grants
(Active Grants FY 23/24-Current)
Mental Wellness, Workforce Development, Academic
Support, Capacity Building, 0-5 Child Development and
Childcare, Violence Intervention
40 5,751,568$
TOTAL 6,185,290$
Community Based Organization Collaboration and Support List 10