Item 08 2025-00800 ParkeBridge East Rezone (P24-024) [Noticed on 4.18.2025; Passed for Publication 4.22.2025; Published 4.18.2025, 4.25.2025]

City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.

ParkeBridge East Rezone (P24-024) [Noticed on 4/18/2025; Passed for Publication 4/22/2025; Published 4/18/2025, 4/25/2025]
File ID: 2025-00800
Location: APN: 250-0010-120-0000, Southeast Corner of Terraview Street and Havenparke Way, south of Interstate 80; District 3
Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, adopt: 1) a Resolution determining that the project does not require further environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15183 (projects consistent with a community plan, general plan, or zoning); 2) an Ordinance to rezone 4.87 acres from Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD) and Agriculture - Open Space (A-OS-PUD) zoning to Single Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A -PUD) zoning; 3) a Resolution for: a) a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Schematic Plan Amendment incorporating the site as a new residential village in the ParkeBridge PUD and removing it from the Sutter West PUD; and b) PUD Guidelines Amendment to add Village 5 residential lot and development standards to allow for a new housing product; and 4) a resolution for: a) a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide one 4.87-acre parcel into 41 residential lots; b) Tentative Subdivision Map Design Deviation for non-standard residential street sections; and c) Site Plan and Design Review for review of the Tentative Subdivision Map, circulation and proposed PUD Guidelines amendment.

Contact: Jose Quintanilla, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5879, [email protected]; Garrett Norman, Senior Planner, (916) 808-7934, [email protected]; Community Development Department
Presenter: Jose Quintanilla, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5879, Community Development Department
Applicant: Clifton Taylor, JEN California 25 LLC, 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661
Property Owner: Same as Applicant.

Attachments:
01-Description/Analysis

Page 1 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.
02-Background
03-Resolution: Environmental Determination
04-Ordinance: Rezone
05-Exhibit A: Rezone Exhibit
06-Resolution: ParkeBridge PUD Amendment
07-Exhibit A: Schematic Plan Amendment
08-Exhibit B: Guidelines Amendment
09-Resolution: Entitlements
10-Exhibit A: Project Plans
11-Exhibit B: Tentative Map Design Deviation Justifications 12-Community Comments
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The applicant is requesting entitlements to allow for a 41-lot residential subdivision on a

4.87-acre site. House plans are not proposed with this request.

The following entitlements are requested:
1) Rezone:

Ordinance rezoning 4.87 acres from Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD) and Agriculture - Open Space (A-OS-PUD) zoning to Single Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A- PUD) zoning and ParkeBridge Planned Unit Development.
2) Amendments to the ParkeBridge Planned Unit Development: Resolution amending the ParkeBridge PUD schematic plan to incorporate the site as a new residential village in the ParkeBridge PUD and the PUD guidelines to update residential development and lot size standards to allow for a new housing product.
3) Tentative Map:
a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide one 4.87-acre parcel into 41 residential lots and 5 lots for private streets; Tentative Subdivision Map Design Deviation for non-standard residential street sections.
4) Site Plan and Design Review:

Site Plan and Design Review for review of the Tentative Subdivision Map, layout, circulation, and proposed Village 5 development standards of the ParkeBridge PUD.

Rezones require approval from the City Council. In accordance with City Code section 17.808.310 all permits associated with a single development project are reviewed and decided at the highest level required for the project.

Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments: As part of the application review process, the proposed project was routed to the following neighborhood groups: Gardenland/Northgate Neighborhood Association, Natomas Community Association, Natomas Chamber of Commerce, South Natomas Improvement Association, South Natomas United, Preservation Sacramento, Civic

Page 2 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.

Thread, Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, and Region Builders.

Staff also mailed hearing notices to all property owners, residents, and neighborhood groups within 500 feet of the project site and posted the site 10 days prior to the public hearing. At the time of writing this report, staff has not received any additional comments, aside from those below. All comments received are included in Attachment 12 and are summarized below.

Staff received comments from a nearby resident of the ParkeBridge neighborhood that expressed the following questions and concerns:

1. Wall Construction Between ParkeBridge and Adjacent Vacant Land.

Staff Response: City Code (SCC 17.620.120.A) requires that a minimum 6-foot-tall solid wall be constructed along all property lines where commercial use abuts a residential zone or use.

There is a 200-foot-wide electrical transmission easement that separates the ParkeBridge development from the vacant lands to the east. This 200-foot-wide easement will act as a buffer to any proposed development to the east.

A sound wall is proposed along the northern boundary of the project where it abuts Interstate 80 to help with sound attenuation. The wall is expected to be a continuation of the existing soundwall between ParkeBridge Villages 1-4 and Interstate 80.

2. Street Connection to Northgate Boulevard and Traffic Impacts.

Staff Response: The proposed development provides a stubbed connection in the northeast corner of the proposed subdivision map to allow for future connection to the vacant lands to the east. Additionally, the existing Fong Ranch Road can also be extended further east.

Connectivity is a key component of a functional transportation network, and a future vehicle connection to Northgate Boulevard is consistent with the City's 2040 General Plan policies (LUP-2.5). Establishing this connection provides additional access for residents to local businesses and services reduces strain to existing roadways, such as San Juan Road, and improves overall circulation and access.

Concerns regarding potential cut-through traffic are noted. However, the City's traffic planning process considers a variety of factors when evaluating new roadway connections, including overall network efficiency, emergency access, and multimodal transportation needs. Traffic calming measures are utilized on an as needed basis should they be warranted by a recommendation of a traffic analysis. These analyses can also recommend existing roadways provide traffic calming measures, such as speed humps/undulations. The connection points to Northgate Boulevard will be determined at the time the vacant lands to the east are developed.

Policy Considerations:

Page 3 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.
2040 General Plan
The 2040 General Plan designation for the project site is Residential Mixed Use (RMU). The General Plan recognizes that Residential Mixed Use designation areas are intended to foster vibrant, walkable areas with a high intensity mix of residential, commercial, office, and public uses, where daily errands can be accomplished on foot, by bicycle, or by transit. The RMU designation applies principally to the Central City and the corridors.

Staff also finds that the project is consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:

Goal LUP-2. Balanced and connected community with thriving neighborhoods and centers and development intensities linked to transit.

Policy LUP-2.5 Design for Connectivity. The City shall require that all new development maximizes existing and new connections with surroundings and with centers, corridors, parks, and neighborhoods to enhance efficient and direct pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle movement.

When feasible, grid patterns should be utilized to facilitate multiple routes.

The proposed residential development will integrate with the existing ParkeBridge development to the west and south by connecting to the existing street network, extending Parkechannel Street to the north, and providing for a future east-west connection to connect to Northgate Boulevard.

Goal LUP-6. A city of healthy, livable, “complete neighborhoods” that provide for residents’ daily needs within easy walking or biking distance from home.

Policy LUP-6.3 Variety of Housing Types. The City shall promote the development of a greater variety of housing types and sizes in all existing and new growth communities to meet the needs of future demographics and changing household sizes, including the following:
- Single-unit homes on small lots,
- Accessory dwelling units,
- Tiny homes,
- Alley-facing units,
- Townhomes,
- Lofts,
- Live-work spaces,
- Duplexes,

Page 4 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.
- Triplexes,
- Fourplexes,
- Cottage/bungalow courts,
- Neighborhood-scale multi-unit buildings, and
- Senior and student housing.

Policy LUP-6.4 Neighborhood Form. The City shall recognize the patterns in existing neighborhoods by developing defined transitions between these neighborhoods and adjoining areas, and by requiring that new development, both private and public, consider the existing physical characteristics of buildings, streetscapes, open spaces, and urban form of the neighborhood in its design. Designs may be traditional or contemporary but should contribute to the livability of the neighborhood.

Policy LUP-6.5 Established Neighborhoods. The City should encourage new development to respect the pedestrian-scale, pre- automobile form, and lush urban forest that typifies established neighborhoods and contributes to their sense of place.

The project proposes new residential standards be added to the ParkeBridge PUD to accommodate residential development on the proposed lots. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lots can fit the requirements established in the PUD. The proposed standards are consistent and complementary to the existing ParkeBridge development and will provide an entry-level housing product with smaller lots.

Goal LUP-8. A unique and varied sense of place, defined by distinctive natural and urban elements that contribute to local quality of life and hometown pride.

Policy LUP-8.5 Development Adjacent to Freeways and Railroad Corridors. The City shall promote high-quality design of buildings along freeway and railway corridors, including promoting techniques such as the following:
- Requiring extensive landscaping and trees along the freeway fronting elevation in consultation with City staff, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, and Caltrans;
- Establishing a consistent building line, articulating and modulating building elevations and heights, and varying the use of materials and color to create visual interest; and - Including design elements that reduce noise and provide for filtering, ventilation, and exhaust of vehicle air emissions.

This development proposes a landscape lot along the northern boundary of the project which abuts

Page 5 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.

This development proposes a landscape lot along the northern boundary of the project which abuts Interstate 80. A solid wall will separate the proposed development from the Interstate. Additionally, landscaping and a Class I Shared-Use Path will be built on this lot that can be extended to the vacant lands to the east providing a multi-modal connection to Northgate Blvd.

South Natomas Community Plan
The project site is located within the South Natomas Community Plan Area of the General Plan. The General Plan envisions the Community Plan Area as a lively, sustainable community where protection of the well-loved and well-connected American River Parkway and other natural areas goes hand-in-hand with sensitive infill development. The South Natomas Community Plan does not have any applicable goals or policies for the proposed use or subject site. 200-Year Flood Protection: State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810 require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that new development will have protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by SAFCA’s Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project.

Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the local flood management agency, SAFCA, has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will ensure protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by 2025. This is based on the SAFCA Urban level of flood protection plan, adequate progress baseline report, and adequate progress toward an urban level of flood protection engineer’s report that were accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2016-0226 on June 21, 2016, and the SAFCA 2024 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by City Council Resolution No. 2024-0311 on October 22, 2024.

No Net Loss (Government Code § 65863): This project is located on a site listed in the 2021-2029 RHNA Housing Element Sites Inventory, which anticipates 30 total units of lower income housing.

The project does not include a reduction of residential capacity within the meaning of Government Code § 65863 (housing element no net loss) or Government Code § 66300 (housing crisis act no net loss).

Economic Impacts: Not applicable.

Environmental Considerations: On February 27, 2024, the City of Sacramento adopted the 2040 General Plan, which became effective on March 28, 2024. The City of Sacramento also certified a Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) associated with the 2040 General Plan on February 27, 2024. The General Plan MEIR is a master EIR, prepared pursuant to Section 15169 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, §15000 et seq.). The General Plan MEIR analyzed full implementation of the General Plan and identified measures to mitigate the significant

Page 6 of 7 ends

File ID: 2025-00800 5/13/2025 Item 8.
adverse impacts associated with the General Plan to the maximum extent feasible.

Under Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, where a project is consistent with the development density established for a property under an existing general plan or zoning ordinance for which the City already certified an EIR, additional environmental review is not required “except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.”
The City prepared a Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist that supports the conclusion that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts that: 1) were peculiar to the project or the project site; 2) were not identified as a significant effect in the General Plan MEIR; or 3) were previously identified significant effects, and which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan MEIR was certified, were determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the General Plan MEIR.

The Environmental Services Manager has, based upon the analysis and conclusions of the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, the project does not require further review. The Initial Study/15183 Checklist is available on the City’s EIR webpage at:
<https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/community-development/planning/environmental/impact-reports> Sustainability: Not applicable
Commission/Committee Action: On March 27, 2025, the Planning and Design Commission voted unanimously to forward a motion to approve the proposed project.

Rationale for Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the requested entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to conditions of approval listed within Attachments 3-11. The proposal complies with the goals and policies of the 2040 General Plan in that this residential development will make use of a vacant parcel and provide much needed housing. The creation of additional for-sale housing opportunities furthers the city’s goal of encouraging additional housing choices, while also designing an interconnected neighborhood with pedestrian and bicycle amenities for a family-friendly neighborhood.

Financial Considerations: Not applicable.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): No goods or services are being purchased under this report.

Page 7 of 7 ends

Figure 1: Vicinity Map

Background
The project site consists of a 4.87-acre vacant parcel located in the Sutter West Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Sutter West PUD is undeveloped, and all parcels located within the PUD are vacant. Records indicate that the Sutter West PUD was replaced with the adoption of the ParkeBridge PUD in 2006; however, the name remains on the official zoning map and the ParkeBridge guidelines and schematic plan that were adopted did not cover the entire Sutter West PUD area. The area surrounding the site is comprised of the existing ParkeBridge residential subdivision to the south and west, Interstate 80 and unincorporated Sacramento County (the “Pan”) to the north, and vacant land to the east. There is a future light rail station which will serve the extension of the Green Line proposed to the southwest of the project site at San Juan Road and Truxel Road. The project site is split zoned Office Business Low Rise (OB-PUD) and Agriculture – Open Space (A-OS-PUD). As part of this project, the site will be rezoned to the R-1A-PUD zone and will become part of the ParkeBridge PUD as a new residential village.

Table 1: Site and Project Information
General Plan Designation: Residential Mixed Use (RMU)
Community Plan Area: South Natomas
Design Review District: Citywide
Planned Unit Development (PUD): Sutter West (Existing); ParkeBridge (Proposed)
Existing Zoning of Site: Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD); Agriculture – Open Space (A-OS-PUD)
Proposed Zoning of Site: Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Parking District: Traditional
Existing Use of Site: Vacant
Total Parcel Area: 4.87 gross acres; 3.42 net acres
Density: Min. Required: 7 du/na1; Proposed 11.98 du/na
1 Net acreage means the total area of a site excluding land dedicated to a public agency for parks, public buildings, schools, street right-of-way, and utility facilities; private park and recreation facilities that receive parkland dedication credit under the city code; and private street right-of-way when built to city street standards.

Entitlement Review
The applicant is requesting entitlements to subdivide a vacant lot into 41 residential lots, and five lots for private streets and existing SMUD and Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) easements within the ParkeBridge PUD.

Rezone
The applicant requests to rezone one parcel totaling 4.87 acres in the Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD) and Agriculture – Open Space (A-OS-PUD) within the Sutter West Planned Unit Development to the Single Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) zone within the ParkeBridge Planned Unit Development. The requested rezone would allow the development of the proposed subdivision, as the Office Business Low-Rise zone does not allow single-unit residential development. SCC section 17.808.230.C.1.d requires the following findings be made to approve a rezone: 1) the rezone is consistent with the applicable general plan designation, use, and development standards; the goals, policies, or other provisions of the general plan; and any applicable specific plan; 2) the amendment promotes the public health, safety, and convenience, and welfare of the city.

The proposed rezone is consistent with the 2040 General Plan land use designation of Residential Mixed Use which encourages vibrant, walkable areas with a high intensity mix of residential, commercial, office, and public uses, where daily errands can be accomplished on foot, by bicycle, or by transit. The proposed subdivision is allowed in this zone and fits within this General Plan designation by providing new residential ownership opportunities within the South Natomas Community Plan area.

Planned Unit Development Amendment
Schematic Plan Amendment
The project site is located within the Sutter West PUD per the City’s official zoning map.

The applicant requests that the property be removed from the Sutter West PUD and incorporated into the ParkeBridge PUD as a new residential village to maintain continuity with the existing ParkeBridge community.

An amendment to the Schematic Plan is required to recognize this property as part of the ParkeBridge PUD. The Schematic Plan amendment, as shown in Attachment 7 (and below), redesignates the parcel as Village 5 of the ParkeBridge PUD. Village 5 includes its own development standards for building setbacks and lot sizes which are characteristic of the proposed subdivision layout and consistent with development standards for other villages in the PUD.

Guidelines Amendment
The applicant is proposing a guidelines amendment to incorporate development standards for Village 5. Accordingly, the applicant proposes amending Table 2-2 of the PUD document to add the Village 5 standards. The standards include minimum lot size, depth, and width, as well as setback requirements, maximum building coverage, and maximum building height. The proposed development standards are compatible with the other villages. The full development standards table is included as Attachment 8 to this report.

Tentative Subdivision Map
The applicant is proposing to subdivide 4.87 gross acres into 41 residential parcels. The proposed residential parcels range in size from 2,400 square feet to a maximum size of 6,205 square feet. In addition to the residential lots, the map proposes five additional lots, including three lots for the proposed private streets, one landscape lot containing a Class I shared-use path, and a landscape lot to be left undeveloped (Lot E). The common lots will be maintained through covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), and by a Homeowners Association (HOA).

The applicant proposes amending Table 2-2 of the PUD document to include residential development standards for Village 5. The standards include minimum lot size, depth, and width for new parcels. The proposed project was evaluated using the proposed lot size development standards for Village 5 and therefore deviations to the lot size requirements in the R-1A zone is not required since new standards are being created within the PUD.

Tentative Map Design Deviations
This project requires Tentative Map Design Deviations for non-standard street sections for residential development (SCC Chapter 17.842). The first subdivision modification is for the proposed 24-foot-wide private streets (Street Section B). The proposed street section does not meet the City of Sacramento’s design criteria for the City’s 53-foot- wide local residential street section (see Plate 15-2, Design and Procedures Manual, Section 15 – Street Design Standards). The proposed road section for this project has been revised from City standards to remove the curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscape planter. This section conforms with the recently constructed ParkeBridge Village 4 improvements.

The second subdivision modification is for the proposed Parkechannel Way (Street Section D). The proposed Parkechannel Way residential street section does not conform to the City standard Residential Street section (Plate 15-2). The section as proposed includes a wider sidewalk (8 feet wide versus 5 feet wide) and a wider planter (7.5 feet wide versus 6.5 feet wide) on one side and is based on the following direction provided by the City of Sacramento: conform to the recently constructed ParkeBridge Village 2 Parkechannel Way cross section, with modification to place the right-of-way line at back of widened sidewalk. Figures 3 and 4, below, show the proposed street sections in comparison to the street standard street section for a residential street (Plate 15-2).

Figure 3: Street Section B, Tentative Map vs. Plate 15-2, Local Residential Street

Figure 4: Street Section D vs. Plate 15-2, Residential Street (see Fig. 3, above)

The applicant has provided an engineer justification letter for the proposed deviations (see attachment 11). The deviation requests have been reviewed by the Transportation Division of the Department of Public Works. Public Works do not object to these deviations and recommend they be approved as they achieve the goals of the city for street circulation.

Site Plan and Design Review
Site Plan and Design Review was used for review of the overall subdivision layout and proposed PUD guidelines amendment relative to residential development standards, including lot size. All standards that are not listed in the PUD guidelines are regulated by the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) zone in the Planning and Development Code.

There is no home construction proposed with this request. At the time house designs are proposed, they will be evaluated for conformance with the applicable development standards for Village 5 established in the ParkeBridge PUD and other applicable portions of the Planning and Development Code.

Per the guidelines amendment for Village 5 in the ParkeBridge PUD, the subdivision complies with the applicable development standards.

Table 2: Applicable Development Standards
Standard Required Provided Deviation
Min. Lot Size Min. 2,400 SF 2,400 – 6,205 SF N
Min. Lot Width Min. 40’ Min. 40’ N
Min. Lot Depth Min. 60’ Min. 60’ N
Max. Lot Depth1 Max. 160’ Max. 108’ N
1 R-1A development standard
Site Access, Circulation, and Parking
Access to the site will be provided through new connections to the existing Havenparke Circle and Terraview Street to the west, and the proposed Parkechannel Way extension to the east. The project includes three private internal streets, labeled Lots B, C, and D on the tentative subdivision map. Street section A (Lot B) includes a 24.7-foot-wide right-of-way (ROW) and would be bordered by gutter and curb improvements and Lot A which includes landscaping, a Class I Shared-Use Path, and sound wall. Street section B (Lots C, and D) includes a 24-foot-wide right-of-way. Street section B will connect to Terraview Street and the Parkechannel Way extension, while Street section A will connect to all adjacent streets including Havenparke Circle.

The proposed Parkechannel Way extension would include the construction of a 57-foot- wide ROW comprised of two 15-foot-wide travel lanes with a planter on either side, as well as an eight-foot-wide sidewalk on the eastern side of the roadway and a five-foot- wide sidewalk on the western side of the roadway. The on-site portion of Parkechannel Way will extend north within the eastern portion of the project site and is designed to be extended to the east with future development.

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
May 13, 2025
Adopting the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist for the ParkeBridge East Rezone Project (P24-024) (APN: 250-0010-120-0000)

BACKGROUND
A. On March 27, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the ParkeBridge East Rezone project (P24-024) and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council.

B. On May 13, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010(2)(b) and received and considered evidence concerning the ParkeBridge East Rezone project (P24-013).

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

The City Council finds as follows:

A. Based on the determination and recommendation of the City’s Environmental Planning Services Manager and the oral and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the project, the City Council finds that the project does not require further environmental from review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) as follows:

1. Pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the project is consistent with the use and density established under the existing 2040 General Plan for which the City has certified a Master EIR.

2. The Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, provided for in the CEQA Guidelines, concluded that the project would not result in any project-specific significant impacts that: (1) are peculiar to the project or the project site; (2) are not identified as a significant effect in the Master EIR; or (3) are previously identified significant effects, and which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the Master EIR was certified, were determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the Master EIR.

3. Based upon Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines , the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist identifies the 2040 General Plan policies and/or actions that apply to the development of the project and have been determined in the Master EIR to substantially mitigate environ mental effects. To the extent that the 2040 General Plan policies and/or actions substantially mitigate a particular project impact, the impact shall not be considered peculiar, pursuant to Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, thus, eliminating the requirement for further environmental review.

SECTION 2.

The City Council directs that, upon approval of the Project, the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a Notice of Determination with the Sacramento County Clerk and with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to section 21152(a) of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.

SECTION 3.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 915 I Street, Sacramento, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City Council.

Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on May 13, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ORDINANCE NO. 2025-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
May 13, 2025
Ordinance Amending Title 17 Of the Sacramento City Code by Rezoning 4.87± Acres from the Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD) Zone and Agriculture – Open Space (A-OS-PUD) Zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Zone at Southeast Corner of Terraview Street and Havenparke Way, South of Interstate 80 (250-0010-120-0000)

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO:

SECTION 1.

As used in this ordinance, “Property” means the real property depicted in attached and incorporated in Exhibit A and contains one APN.

SECTION 2.

Title 17 of the Sacramento City Code (“Planning and Development Code”) is hereby amended by rezoning 4.87± acres from the Office Business Low-Rise (OB-PUD) zone and Agriculture – Open Space (A-OS-PUD) zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) zone, as shown on Exhibit A.

SECTION 3.

As required by section 17.808.230.C.1.d of the Planning and Development Code, the City Council finds that the rezoning of the property is consistent with the 2040 General Plan designation of Residential Mixed Use , the proposed residential use, and development standards in that the proposed project 1) provides for residential development on a n vacant piece of property with a residential subdivision that is compatible with the surrounding uses and neighborhood, 2) complies with lot size and development standards of the R-1A-PUD zone and the Parke Bridge PUD , and 3) promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City in that the proposed use provides additional housing opportunities for the community.

SECTION 4.

The City Clerk is hereby directed to amend the City’s official zoning maps to conform with this ordinance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Exhibit A – Rezone Exhibit (1 page) is part of this ordinance.

Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on May 13, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
May 13, 2025
Amending the ParkeBridge Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Incorporate 4.87 Acres from the Sutter West PUD, to Designate the Site for Residential Uses, and to Add Development Standards for Residential Uses in Village 5 (P24-024) (APN:
250-0010-120-0000)

BACKGROUND
A. On March 27, 202 5, the Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve with conditions the ParkeBridge East Rezone project (P2 4-024), which includes amending the schematic plan to incorporate the subject site as Village 5 into the PUD, designating the site for residential use, and to establish development standards for residential uses in Village 5.

B. On May 13, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant to Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010(2)(b).

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the ParkeBridge East Rezone project, the City Council approves the amendment s to the ParkeBridge Planned Unit Development, attached as Exhibit A-B, based on the following findings of fact:

A. The amendment is consistent with the applicable general plan land use designation, use, and development standards; the goals, policies, and other provisions of the general plan; and any applicable specific plan or transit village in that the Residential Mixed Use General Plan designation allows for vibrant, walkable areas with a high intensity mix of residential, commercial, office, and public uses, where daily erran ds can be accomplished on foot, by bicycle, or by transit. The amendment is also consistent with the development pattern of the ParkeBridge PUD in that comparable development standards have been incorporated into the PUD for the new Village 5.

B. The amendment promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the city in that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding residential uses and provides additional housing opportunities for the community.

C. The proposed amendment is consistent with the proposed zoning designation, Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) in that single-unit residential uses are an allowed use in the zone.

SECTION 2.

The Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan is amended as shown in Exhibit A.

SECTION 3.

The Planned Unit Development Guidelines of the ParkeBridge PUD are amended to read as shown in Exhibit B.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Exhibit A: ParkeBridge PUD Village 5 Schematic Map Amendment Exhibit B: ParkeBridge PUD Guidelines Amendment

Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on May 13, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

Exhibit 1-1 PUD Schematic Plan
ParkeBridge PUD Guidelines Page 1-3 Resolution 2014-0198 June 17, 2014 Page 7 of 26

PARKEBRIDGE EAST

PUD REVISION

TABLE 2-2 Development Standards - Villages 2, 3A, 3B, 4, & 5 (Single-Family) CRITERIA Village 2 Village 3 A OR B Village 4 Village 5 ANTICIPATED LOT SIZE 2,550 S.F. LOTS 3,600 S.F. LOTS 5,000 S.F. LOTS 2,400 S.F. LOTS ANTICIPATED LOT DIMENSIONS 34' X 73' 45' X 80' 50' X 100' 40' X 60' MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 34' 45' 50' 40'
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH 70' 72' 95' 60'
MINIMUM SETBACKS (1, 2, 3, 4)
Front (2)
Living Area/Porch 10' 10' 12.5' 10'
Front Entry Garage 18' 18' 20' 18'
Rear (2) 10' 15' 15' 5'
Side (2) 4' or
Zero lot line with 0' one side
and 4' other side (5)
5' 5' 3'
Corner Side
Living Area 10' 10' 12.5' 10'
Porches 10' 10' 12.5' 10'
Rear Patio Covers 5' 5' 10' 5'
2nd Story Decks 10' 10' 10' 10'
(Measured to Facia)

FRONT COURTYARD WALLS
Wall Ht. Below 5'
Front: 5' 5' 5' 5'
Side: 0' 0' 0' 0'
Corner Side 5' 5' 5' 5'
Wall Ht. Above 5'
Front: 10' 10' 10' 10'
Side: 0' 0' 0' 0'
Corner Side: 5' 5' 5' 5'

MAX BUILDING CONVERAGE
(Excluding Porches & Patio Covers)
2 Story Plans 60% 55% 55% 70%
1 Story Plans 70% 65% 60% 75%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35' 35' 35' 35'

Notes

1. Front Setbacks and corner side setbacks are measured from the back of walk or back of curb where there is no walk.

2. Interior side and rear setbacks are measured from property line.

3. Architectural projections may project a maximum of 3 feet into required front, rear or side setback areas; however, in no case shall such projection be closer than 3 feet to any property line. An architectural projection is defined as an element that articulates the building elevation such as, media niches, library niches, bay windows, chimneys, balconies and other similar elements.

4. Window and door pop-out surrounds, pot shelves, enhanced window sills, shutter details, window trim, entry gates and projecting eaves shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Uniform Building Code (UBC).

5. 0' on one side and 4' the other side to allow zero lot line product. Otherwise 4' side yard on both sides.

6. Adequate paved area in side yard shall be provided behind front fence for storage of refuse and recycling containers (mandatory).

PARKEBRIDGE EAST

PUD REVISION

FRONT COURTYARD WALLS
Wall Ht. Below 5'
Front: 5' 5' 5' 5'
Side: 0' 0' 0' 0'
Corner Side 5' 5' 5' 5'
Wall Ht. Above 5'
Front: 10' 10' 10' 10'
Side: 0' 0' 0' 0'
Corner Side: 5' 5' 5' 5'

MAX BUILDING CONVERAGE
(Excluding Porches & Patio Covers)
2 Story Plans 60% 55% 55% 70%
1 Story Plans 70% 65% 60% 75%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 35' 35' 35' 35'

Notes

1. Front Setbacks and corner side setbacks are measured from the back of walk or back of curb where there is no walk.

2. Interior side and rear setbacks are measured from property line.

5. 0' on one side and 4' the other side to allow zero lot line product. Otherwise 4' side yard on both sides.

6. Adequate paved area in side yard shall be provided behind front fence for storage of refuse and recycling containers (mandatory).

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
May 13, 2025
Adopting Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval to Approve the ParkeBridge East Rezone Project (P24-024) (APN: 250-0010-120-0000)
Background
A. On March 27, 2025, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the ParkeBridge East Rezone project (P24-024) and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.

Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Project, the City Council approves the Project entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

SECTION 2.

The City Council approves the project entitlements based on the following findings of fact:

A. Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide one 4.87-acre parcel into 41 residential lots is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. None of the conditions described in Government Code section 66 474 exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows:
a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code.
b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, and all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code. c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code (Gov. Code §66473.5).

3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the appli cable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. Code §66474.6).

4. The design of t he proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code §66473.1).

5. The City has considered the effect of the approval of this tentative subdivision map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code §66412.3).

B. Tentative Map Design Deviation for non -standard residential street sections is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. The property to be divided is of such size or shape, or is affected by such topographic conditions, or that there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property that it is impossible, impractical, or undesirab le in the particular case to conform to the strict application of these regulations. This project requires Tentative Map Design Deviations for non -standard street sections for residential development ( Plate 15-2; SCC Chapter 17.842). The deviation requests have been reviewed by the Transportation Division of the Department of Public Works. Public Works do not object to these deviations and recommend they be approved as they achieve the goals of the city for

street circulation.

2. The cost to the subdivider of strict or literal compliance with the regulation is not the sole reason for granting the deviation.

3. The deviation will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be injurious to other properties in the vicinity. The modified roadway segments do not impede movement through the site and are consistent with the roadways of the existing ParkeBridge immediately adjacent to the site.

4. That granting the deviation is in accord with the intent and purposes of these regulations and is consistent with the general plan and with all other applicable specific plans of the city.

C. Site Plan and Design Review for review of the Tentative Subdivision Map is approved based on the following Findings of Fact:

1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan or transit village plan. The project supports the goals of the Residential Mixed Use (RMU) designation which envisions vibrant, walkable areas with a high intensity mix of residential, commercial, office, and public uses, where daily errands can be accomplished on foot, by bicycle, or by transit . The proposed development provides needed housing in the South Natomas Community Plan Area.

2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with applicable design guidelines and with all applicable development standards . The proposed subdivision meets all development standards of the R-1A zone and the ParkeBridge PUD. No deviations from applicable standards are requested.

3. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development . The project provides connections to existing streets serving the ParkeBridge area and provides for the future extension of Parkechannel Way to the east of the project site.

4. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and fu nctionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood .

The subdivision is similar in design to the adjacent ParkeBridge development.

5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development ensure energy consumption is minimized, and use of renewable energy sources is encouraged in that the proposed project must comply with

CalGreen Building Code regulations.

6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, c onvenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance in that natural surveillance is considered in the layout of the proposed subdivision and the addition of new homes on a vacant lot improves the surrounding area.

D. 200-Year Flood Protection Finding Consistent with State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code Section 17.810:

The project site is within an area for which the local flood -management agency has made adequate progress (as defined in California Government Code section 65007) on the construction of a flood -protection system that, for the area intended to be protected by the system, will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban areas for property located within a flood - hazard zone, as demonstrated by the SAFCA Urban Level of Flood Protection Plan and Adequate Progress Baseline Report and the SAFCA Adequate Progress Toward an Urban Leve l of Flood Protection Engineer’s Report, each accepted by the City Council on June 21, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016 -0226), and the SAFCA 202 4 Adequate Progress Annual Report accepted by the City Council on October 22, 2024 (Resolution No. 2024-0311).

E. No Net Loss (Government Code § 65863):

This project is located on a site listed in the 2021-2029 RHNA Housing Element Sites Inventory, which anticipates 30 total units of lower income housing. The project does not include a reduction of residential capacity withi n the meaning of Government Code § 65863 (housing element no net loss) or Government Code § 66300 (housing crisis act no net loss).

Conditions of Approval
A. Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide one 4.87-acre parcel into 41 residential lots is approved subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

Note: These conditions shall supersede any contradictory information shown on the Tentative Map or any contradictory provisions in the PUD guidelines approved for this project (P24-024). The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions or the PUD Guidelines shall be to City standard.

The applicant shall satisfy each of the following conditions prior to filing the Final Map unless a different time for compliance is specifically stated in these condi tions. Any condition requiring an improvement that has already been designed and secured under a City Approved improvement agreement may be considered satisfied at the

discretion of the Department of Public Works.

The City strongly encourages the applican t to thoroughly discuss the conditions of approval for the project with their Engineer/Land Surveyor consultants prior to City Planning Commission approval. The improvements required of a Tentative Map can be costly and are completely dependent upon the c ondition of the existing improvements. Careful evaluation of the potential cost of the improvements required by the City will enable the applicant to ask questions of the City prior to project approval and will result in a smoother plan check process after project approval:

GENERAL: All Projects
A1. This tentative map approval expires on May 13, 2028, three (3) years from the effective date of approval and subject to Section 17.828.160.

Time extensions for tentative maps may be granted as provided in Section

17.828.170. Time extensions are discretionary and not the automatic right of the applicant.

A2. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.500.190, indicate easements on the Final Map to allow for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The specific locations for such easements shall be subject to review and approval of the Department of Public Works after consultation with the U.S. Postal Service.

A3. Private reciprocal ingress, egress, and maneuvering easements are required for future development of the area cov ered by this Tentative Map. The applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement For Conveyance of Easements with the City stating that a private reciprocal ingress/egress, and maneuvering easement shall be conveyed to and reserved from all appropriate lots, at no cost, at the time of sale or other conveyance of either parcel.

A4. Comply with requirements included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan developed by, and kept on file in, the Planning Division Office (P04-212 & P13- 066).

A5. Meet all conditions of the existing PUD (P04 -212 & P13 -066) unless the condition is superseded by a Tentative Map condition.

A6. Show all continuing and proposed/required easements on the Final Map.

PUBLIC WORKS:

Matthew Ilagan (916) 808-8502, [email protected] A7. Submit a Geotechnical Analysis prepared by a registered engineer to be used in street design. The analysis shall identify and recommend solutions for

groundwater related problems, which may occur within both the subd ivision lots and public right -of-way. Construct appropriate facilities to alleviate those problems. As a result of the analysis street sections shall be designed to provide for stabilized subgrades and pavement sections under high groundwater conditions;
A8. Construct standard subdivision improvements as noted in these conditions pursuant to section 17.504.050 of the City Code. All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvements required shall be determined by the city. The City shall determine improvements required for each phase prior to recordation of each phase. Any public improvement not specifically noted in these conditions or on the Tentative Map shall be designed and constructed to City standards.

This shall include the repair or replacement/reconstruction of any existing deteriorated curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the subject property per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A9. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way and construct Terraview Street with separated sidewalks as shown in the tentative map to City Standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A10. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way and construct Parkechannel Way as shown in the tentative map to City Standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The northeastern terminus of Parkechannel Way shall include an interim cul-de-sac with street stub for future connectivity to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A11. The applicant shall provide temporary barricades at the termination of Parkechannel Way near the eastern property line of the proposed project and shall provide all the appropriate improvements, signage, and markings to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A12. Dedicate Irrevocable Offer of Dedications (IODs) and construct all proposed off-street bikeways as shown on the approved tentative subdivision map. The IODs for off -street bike trails shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The construction of all off -street bike trails shall include associated improvements at street crossings, signage and markings per City Standards and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A13. Design the private streets to meet the City standards except for the design deviations to the street standards approved with this project (P24 -024).

Private streets shall install private street signs and shall be inspected to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A14. Provide standard driveways at the entrance to the private streets to the

satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A15. All right-of-way and street improvement transitions that result from changing the right-of-way of any street shall be located, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The center lines of such streets shall be aligned.

A16. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A17. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltra ns standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle).

Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters. Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopp ing sight distance shall be limited 3.5' in height.

The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works.

A18. Landscape Maintenance District: Provide an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate (IOD) to the City for those areas identified on the Tentative Subdivision Map as Landscape areas (Lot A and E). The IOD shall include all necessary easements as required for such areas to be publicly maintained. The intent of the IOD is to transfer ownership of these areas should the Homeowners Association become insolvent. Create, or annex the project area to the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District, or other financing mechanism acceptable to the City, prior to recordation of the final map. Design and construct landscaping, irrigation and masonry wall s in dedicated easements or right of way, consistent with the PUD Design Guidelines and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Acceptance of the required landscaping, irrigation and walls by the City into the Landscape Maintenance District shall be coordinated with the Department of Finance and Public Works.

The Developer shall maintain the landscaping, irrigation and walls through the HOA or another financing mechanism acceptable to the City.

PUBLIC WORKS – ELECTRICAL:

John Matoba (916) 808-7891, [email protected] A19. This project will require the installation of streetlights on all public streets to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. This will require the electrica l design plans to be prepared and stamped by a registered civil or electrical engineer submitted with the major encroachment permit application. The Developer will determine the quantity and locations of streetlights based upon the City Lighting Standards. In general, the City Lighting Standard for

illumination is the following: the illumination levels are 0.10 footcandles minimum for residential applications and 0.20 footcandles minimum for non - residential. The illumination levels for crosswalks, roundabouts, and signalized intersections shall meet the American National Standard Institute (ANSI)/Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) RP-8 guidelines. A photometric analysis is required for the first Cycle submission. Residential lighting shall be to the City Standard ornamental streetlights.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DISTRICT (SMUD):

Ellen Springer, (916) 732-5989, [email protected] A20. SMUD has existing overhead 12kV facilities at the N/E corner of project that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required cl earances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A21. SMUD has existing underground empty conduits facilities W/O Parkechannel Way that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalO SHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A22. Structural setbacks less than 14 -feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre- engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

A23. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

A24. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

A25. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible f or any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

A26. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5 -feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify

specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

A27. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 10-foot public utility easement (PUE) on the east side of Terraview Street, a 12.5-foot PUE on the west side of Parkechannel Way, and the entirety of the private streets and 10- foot PUE adjacent on both side (Lot B, C, D) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

A28. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at: https:// www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Design- and- Construction-Services.

A29. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

A30. The Applicant shall locate, verify, and provide a drawing to SMUD identif ying all electrical utility infrastructure for the existing structures. If necessary, any existing onsite electrical infrastructure that serves existing structures shall be relocated to the satisfaction of SMUD.

A31. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads.

A32. The Applicant shall dedicate a nd provide all -weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

A33. The Applicant shall identify SMUD's transmission line easement as a "Restricted Building and Use Area" on the subject map.

A34. SMUD occupies a transmission line easement within the boundaries of the subject map and certain uses are not permitted or compatible with the safety, operation, maintenance and construction of our transmission line facilities. If the Applicant proposes any use within the transmission line easement, the Applicant shall route its plans to SMUD for review. For more information regarding transmission encroachment, please visit:
https://www.smud.org/en/do-business-with-smud/real- estate- services/transmission-right-of-way.htm.

A35. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant or its designee shall obtain a joint -use agreement from SMUD consenting to proposed development within SMUD's transmission line easement. Please contact SMUD's Property Administrator for application procedures.

SacSewer
Steve Kiyama, (916) 876-6657, [email protected]
Douglas Kennedy, (916) 875-4563, [email protected]
Chiya Oka, (916) 875-9810, [email protected]
A36. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Installation of a public cleanout is required at the right-of-way. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A37. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Each owner is responsible for installing collector sized sewer pipeline and appurtenances across the parcel frontage as a condition of approval. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A38. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The minimum size for public sewer mainlines is 8-inch diameter. Public sewer must be located within the right-of-way or a sewer easement. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A39. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required.

Current SacSewer Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

A40. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: SacSewer requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SacSewer’s sewer system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate co nnection to a private onsite sewer line upstream of any connection to the SacSewer sewer. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A41. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines are prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100- year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

A42. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

A43. Prior to the APPR OVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES (DOU):

Saraí Jimenez, (916) 808-5426, [email protected] A44. All existing easements and all existing right -of-ways shall be shown on the Final Map, except for abandoned easements.

A45. The applicant shall grant, and reserve easements as needed, for water and drainage facilities, and for surface storm drainage, at no cost at or before the time of sale or other conveyance of any parcel or lot. A note stating the following shall be placed on the Final Map: “Reciprocal easements for utilities, drainage, and water facilities, and surface storm drainage shall be granted and reserved, as necessary and at no cost, at or before the time of sale or conveyance of any parcel shown in this map.”
A46. Dedicate all necessary easements, right -of-way, fee title property, or IOD in fee title property on the final map as required to implement the approved drainage and water studies per each approving agency requirements.

A47. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water study for review and approval by the DOU. The wat er system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916 -808-7890) at the early planning stages to address an y water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval.

A48. Easements for water meters shall be dedicated to the City and shall include language assuring unrestricted access at all times for DOU personnel and maintenance vehicles.

A49. Two points of service for the water distribution system for this subdivision or

any phase of this subdivision are required or as otherwise approved by the Dept. of Utilities. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as per the City's Design and Procedures Manual.

A50. Common area landscaping shall have a separate street tap for a metered irrigation service.

A51. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall prepa re a project specific drainage study meeting the criteria specified in the current Onsite Design Manual and/or the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. Per the current DOU Onsite Design Manual, either a static or dynamic analysis for mitigating sizing and drainage system design may be used. Using the static analysis and per the DOU onsite project storage method, an estimated 5,300 cubic feet of detention must be provided per each additional acre of impervious area. The maximum discharge rate must be limited to an estimated 0.30 cfs/acre. The drainage study shall be consistent with the ParkeBridge SWMM Drainage Analysis performed for the area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Develop ment Review Section (916 -808- 7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval. (Note: A maintenance agreement may be required for detention and Low Impact Development (LID) features.).

A52. The onsite water and storm drain systems within the private drives/alleys shall be private systems maintained by the homeowner’s association or other approved entity.

A53. Prior to the initiation of any water, sewer or storm drain age services to the project, a homeowner association (HOA), or a privately funded maintenance district shall be formed and C.C. & R.s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and storm drainage facilities within the private property. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities.

The CC&Rs must provide that the City -approved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by th e DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

A54. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is higher or as approved by the DOU.

A55. The proposed project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as A99 zone by the Federal E mergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). As of July 1, 2024, new regulations to this area apply as contained in the current Comprehensive Flood Management Plan (CFMP). Any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any structure must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least 12 -inches above the highest adjacent 100 -year event HGL of the City’s drainage system and at least 18 -inches above the Controlling Overland Release Point in the public righ t-of-way. Also, a Hold Harmless Agreement, and an Elevation or Floodproofing Certificate or both (commercial properties have the option of floodproofing if elevation is not feasible) will be required.

A56. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

A57. This project will dis turb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Applic ation and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

A58. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings. These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.

A59. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area served by an existing regional water quality control facility, therefore only source control, and Low Impact Development (LID) measures are required. Improvement plans must include the measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” Chapter 4 for appropriate source control measures and chapter 5 for appropriate LID and HMP measures. (Note: A maintenance agreement is required for all on-site water quality measures.)

FIRE DEPARTMENT:

King Tunson, (916) 808-1358, [email protected] A60. The farthest projection of the exterior wall of a building shall be accessible from within 250 ft of an approved water supply (fire hydrant) as measured by an unobstructed route around the ex terior of the building. (California Fire Code Sections 507.5.1)
A61. Provide the required fire hydrants in accordance with California Fire Code Section 507 and Appendix C, Section C102.1 as amended the Sacramento City Code Section 507.5.1. The two proposed fire hydrants are insufficient to meet the requirements of Sacramento City Code Section 507.5.1 and at minimum an additional 2 -3 private fire hydrants are required. One for each private road as shown with the proposed fire hydrants located on Parkechannel Street.

A62. Fire service mains shall not cross property lines unless a reciprocal easement agreement is provided.

A63. A reciprocal ingress egress agreement shall be provided for review by City Attorney for all shared private roads being used for Fire Department access.

A64. Maintenance agreements shall be provided for private roadways and for required fire protection systems. The agreement shall be record with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction and shall provide for the following:
a. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface
b. Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) and/or width of twenty feet (20’)
c. Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or striping
d. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems
e. Unrestricted use of and access to the roadways covered by the agreements.
f. Provisions for the control of vehicle parking in prohibited areas and a mechanism for the removal of vehicles illegally parked. g. Maintenance and timely repair of all fire protection systems, including but not limited to hydrants, fire alarm systems and fire sprinklers.

PARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (PPDS)
Dana Repan, (916) 808-2762, [email protected] A65. Payment of In -lieu Park Fee: Pursuant to Sacramento City Code Chapter

17.512 (Parkland Dedication) the applicant shall pay to City an in-lieu park fee in the amount determined under SCC §§17.512.030 and 17.512.040 equal to the value of land prescribed for dedication under 17.512.020 and not satisfied by dedication. (See Advisory Note)
A66. Maintenance District: The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a parks maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos special tax district) or annex the project into an existing parks maintenance district. The applicant shall pay all city fees for for mation of or annexation to a parks maintenance district. (Contact Infrastructure Finance, Brent Mueller, (916)808 -5715, [email protected]).

FINANCE
Mary Jean Rodriguez, (916) 808-1980, [email protected] A67. The applicant shall annex the project to Sacramento Services CFD No. 2018- 05 before recording a Final Map and pay City fees for annexation to this district.

NEW GROWTH
Cheryle Hodge, (916) 808-5971, [email protected] A68. The project is within the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project applicant/developer shall complete the pre -construction surveys for potential special-status species not less than 30 days or more than 6 months prior to construction activities in accordance with the 2003 NBHCP. The pre - construction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, botanist, or related expert and will be reviewed by EPS, CDFW, USFWS, and the Natomas Basin Conservancy.

MISCELLANEOUS
A69. Form a Homeowner's Association with CC&R's. CC&R's shall be recorded assuring maintenance of all private streets/drives, lights, sewer services, drop inlets, drain leads, landscaping, irrigation, noise barriers, and all common areas.

ADVISORY NOTES:

The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map:

A70. If unusual amounts of bone, stone, or artifacts are uncovered, work within 50 meters of the area will cease immediately and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to develop, if necessary, further mitigation measures to reduce any archaeological impact to a less than significant effect before construction resumes. A note shall be placed on the final improvement plans referencing this condition.

PUBLIC WORKS
A71. House plans shall comply with City Code Chapter 17.508 Driveways which includes:

17.508.040.J All driveways shall be at least 5-ft away from the property line.

17.508.050.A Residential driveways shall have a width of at least 10-ft.

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
A72. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies for the construction of this project.

A73. Water meters shall be located at the point of service, which is back of curb for separated sidewalks, back of walk for connected sidewalks or at the inside edge of the right-of-way for public alleys
A74. The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD). Satisfy all SASD requirements.

A75. The proposed development is located within the Reclamation District 1000 (RD-1000). The applicant shall comply with all RD-1000 requirements.

A76. On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023 -0338 and 2023 -0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Combined Sewer Development Fees, as well as, establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024.

FINANCE
A77. The project site is located within the boundaries of the South Natomas Facilities Benefit Assessment District (FBA). Any future development or land use change on the site will be subject to applicable fees during the building permit process. If you have questions regarding the South Natomas FBA Fee, please get in touch with Infrastructure Finance at 916-808-1440.

SAC SEWER
A78. Prior to the ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

A79. Prior to the SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a Level 3 sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appro priate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be done in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by Sac Sewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

PARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
A80. As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a. Title 17, 17.512 Park Dedication / In Lieu (Quimby) Fees, d ue prior to recordation of the final map. The Quimby fee due for this project is estimated at $63,099. This is based on the subdivision from one 4.87-acre parcel to create 41 new residential lots at an average land value of $135,000 per acre for the South Natomas Community Plan Area, plus an additional 20% for off -site park infrastructure improvements. Any change in these factors will change the amount of the Quimby fee due. The final fee is calculated using factors at the time of payment. The fee is due at the time of the final map.
b. Community Facilities District 2002 -02, Neighborhood Park Maintenance CFD Annexation.

C. Site Plan and Design Review for review of the Tentative Subdivision Map is approved subject to the following Conditions of Approval:

PLANNING AND DESIGN REVIEW:

Jose R. Quintanilla, (916) 808-5879, [email protected] C1. This discretionary permit expires on May 13, 2028, three (3) years from the effective date of approval if the use or development project has not been established as provided in Section 17.808.400.A.

Time extensions to establish a use, construct a development project, or to demolish a structure may be granted as provided in Section 17.808.400.B.

Time extensions are discretionary and not the automatic right of the applicant.

C2. This approval is for the subdivision of one parcel into 41 residential lots as shown on the approved Tentative Subdivision Map.

C3. Development of the site shall be in compliance with the approved plans and these conditions of approval. Any modification(s) to the project shall be subject to review and approval by Planning staff (and may require additional entitlements) prior to the issuance of building permits.

C4. The applicant shall obtain all necess ary building and encroachment permits prior to the commencement of construction.

C5. This project is within the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project applicant/developer shall complete the pre -construction surveys for potential special-status species not less than 30 days or more than 6 months prior to construction activities in accordance with the 2003 NBHCP. The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, botanist, or related expert and will be reviewed by EPS, CDFW, USFWS, and the Natomas Basin Conservancy.

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DISTRICT (SMUD):

Ellen Springer, (916) 732-5989, [email protected] C6. SMUD has existing overhead 12kV facilities at the N/E corner of project that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the require d clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

C7. SMUD has existing underground empty conduits facilities W/O Parkechannel Way that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

C8. Structural setbacks less than 14 -feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre- engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

C9. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall

require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property.

C10. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal.

C11. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be res ponsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs.

C12. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5 -feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

C13. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 10-foot public utilit y easement (PUE) on the east side of Terraview Street, a 12.5-foot PUE on the west side of Parkechannel Way, and the entirety of the private streets and 10- foot PUE adjacent on both side (Lot B, C, D) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD.

C14. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUD siting requirements can be found at: https://www.smud.org/en/Business -Solutions-and-Rebates/Design- and- Construction-Services.

C15. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

C16. The Applicant shall locate, verify, and provide a drawing to SM UD identifying all electrical utility infrastructure for the existing structures. If necessary, any existing onsite electrical infrastructure that serves existing structures shall be relocated to the satisfaction of SMUD.

C17. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement for (overhead and) underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads.

C18. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all -weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable

surface shall be 20-feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

C19. The Applicant shall identify SMUD's transmission line easement as a "Restricted Building and Use Area" on the subject map.

C20. SMUD occupies a transmission line easement within the boundaries of the subject map and certain uses are not permitted or compatible with the safety, operation, maintenance and construction of our transmission line facilities. If the Applicant proposes any use within the transmission line easement, the Applicant shall route its plans to SMUD for review. For more informat ion regarding transmission encroachment, please visit:
https://www.smud.org/en/do-business-with-smud/real-estate- services/transmission-right-of-way.htm.

C21. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the Applicant or its designee shall obtain a joint -use agreement from SMUD consenting to proposed development within SMUD's transmission line easement. Please contact SMUD's Property Administrator for application procedures.

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES (DOU):

Saraí Jimenez, (916) 808-5426, [email protected]

C22. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water study for review and approval by the DOU. The water system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water serv ice connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Developme nt Review Section (916 -808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval.

C23. Easements for water meters shall be dedicated to the City and shall include language a ssuring unrestricted access at all times for DOU personnel and maintenance vehicles.

C24. Two points of service for the water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required or as otherwise approved by the

Dept. of Utiliti es. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as per the City's Design and Procedures Manual.

C25. Common area landscaping shall have a separate street tap for a metered irrigation service.

C26. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall prepare a project specific drainage study meeting the criteria specified in the current Onsite Design Manual and/or the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. Per the current DOU Onsite Design Manual, either a static or dynamic analysis for mitigating sizing and drainage system design may be used. Using the static analysis and per the DOU onsite project storage method, an estimated 5,300 cubic feet of detention must be provided per each additional acre of impervious area. The maximum discharge rate must be limited to an estimated 0.30 cfs/acre. The drainage study shall be consistent with the ParkeBridge SWMM Drainage Analysis performed for the area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916 -808- 7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval. (No te: A maintenance agreement may be required for detention and Low Impact Development (LID) features.).

C27. This project is in Drainage Basin 141 which is subject to the new Drainage Pumped Impact Fee per City Council Resolution 2023-0368.

C28. Prior to issuance of any building permits within the subject area all storm drainage and water shall be in place and fully functioning unless otherwise approved by the Department of Utilities.

C29. The onsite water and storm drain systems within the private drives/alleys shall be private systems maintained by the homeowner’s association or other approved entity.

C30. Prior to the initiation of any water, sewer or storm drainage services to the project, a homeowner association (HOA), or a privately funded maintenance district shall be fo rmed and C.C. & R.s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and storm drainage facilities within the private property. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities.

The CC&Rs must provide that the City -approved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of

the DOU and the City Attorney.

C31. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is hi gher or as approved by the DOU.

C32. The proposed project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as A99 zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). As of July 1, 2024, new regulations to this area apply as contained in the current Comprehensive Flood Management Plan (CFMP). Any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any structure must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least 12 -inches above the highest ad jacent 100-year event HGL of the City’s drainage system and at least 18 -inches above the Controlling Overland Release Point in the public right -of-way. Also, a Hold Harmless Agreement, and an Elevation or Floodproofing Certificate or both (commercial prope rties have the option of floodproofing if elevation is not feasible) will be required.

C33. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to ex isting surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

C34. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

C35. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings. These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.

C36. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area served by an existing regional water quality control facility, therefore only source control, and Low Impact Development (LID) measures are required. Improvement plans must i nclude the measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region”

Chapter 4 for appropriate source control measures and chapter 5 for appropriate LID and HMP measures. (Note: A maint enance agreement is required for all on-site water quality measures.)
FIRE DEPARTMENT:

King Tunson, (916) 808-1358, [email protected] C37. Timing and Installation. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. California Fire Code Section 501.4
C38. Roads used for Fire Department access that are less than 28 feet in width shall be marked "No Parking Fire Lane" on both sides; roads less than 36 feet in width shall be marked on one side.

C39. Provide a water flow test. (Make arrangements with the Department of Utilities at 916-808-7890 or by email at
[email protected] California Fire Code Section 507.4
C40. Per the most recently adopted California Residential Code, all new residential construction including 1 and 2 family dwellings and townhouses sha ll be provided with an approved NFPA 13 D sprinkler system.

RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE (RSW):

Adam Roitman, (916) 808-3508, [email protected] C41. Project must meet the requirements outlined in City Code Chapter 13.10.

C42. There must be sufficient space to store a minimum of one garbage, one mixed recycling container, and one organics recycling container per parcel. The space needed is approximately 35 inches by 87 inches per unit. The containers shall be placed out of view from any street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way by fence, landscaping, building, or other barrier or immediately adjacent to the residential building per City Code Chapter 13.10.100.

C43. There must be sufficient space to set ou t three containers (garbage, mixed recycling, and organics recycling) in front of each parcel and remain in compliance with City Code Chapter 13.10.100. Depending on service levels, this may mean up to 8 feet of curb space required.

SACSEWER
Steve Kiyama, (916) 876-6657, [email protected]
Douglas Kennedy, (916) 875-4563, [email protected]
Chiya Oka, (916) 875-9810, [email protected]

C44. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Installation of a public cleanout is required at the right-of-way. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

C45. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT P LANS: Each owner is responsible for installing collector sized sewer pipeline and appurtenances across the parcel frontage as a condition of approval. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

C46. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The minimum si ze for public sewer mainlines is 8-inch diameter. Public sewer must be located within the right-of-way or a sewer easement. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

C47. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required.

C48. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: SacSewer requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SacSewer’s sewer system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line upstream of any connection to the SacSewer sewer. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

C49. Prior to the APP ROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines are prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100- year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

C50. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

C51. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

PARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (PPDS)
Dana Repan, (916) 808-2762, [email protected] C52. Payment of In -lieu Park Fee: Pursuant to Sacramento City Code Chapter

17.512 (Parkland Dedication) the applicant shall pay to City an in-lieu park fee in the amount determined under SCC §§17.512.030 and 17.512.040 equal to the value of land prescribed for dedication under 17.512.020 and not satisfied by dedication. (See Advisory Note)
C53. Maintenance District: The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a parks maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos special tax district) or annex the project into an existing parks maintenance district. The applicant shall pay all city fees for formation o f or annexation to a parks maintenance district. (Contact Infrastructure Finance, Brent Mueller, (916)808 -5715, [email protected]).

Advisory Notes:

DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
C54. The applicant is r esponsible for obtaining all necessary permits, easements, and approvals from federal, state, and local agencies for the construction of this project.

C55. Water meters shall be located at the point of service, which is back of curb for separated sidewalks, bac k of walk for connected sidewalks or at the inside edge of the right-of-way for public alleys
C56. The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD). Satisfy all SASD requirements.

C57. The proposed development is located within the Reclamation District 1000 (RD-1000). The applicant shall comply with all RD-1000 requirements.

C58. On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023 -0338 and 2023 -0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Co mbined Sewer Development Fees, as well as, establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024.

RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE
C59. RSW: Standard Bin and Can Dimensions
Size Height Depth Width
32 gal. can 39 in. 24 in. 19 in.
64 gal. can 40 in. 30 in. 28 in.
96 gal. can 47 in. 35 in. 29 in.
1 yd. bin 4 ft. 2 ft., 9 in. 6 ft., 10 in.
2 yd. bin 4 ft., 5 in. 4 ft. 6 ft., 10 in.
3 yd. bin 5 ft., 1 in. 3 ft., 7in. 6 ft., 10 in.
4 yd. bin 5 ft., 9 in. 4 ft., 8 in. 6 ft., 10 in.
5 yd. bin 5 ft., 3 in. 5 ft., 9 in. 6 ft., 10 in.
6 yd. bin 6 ft. 5 ft., 10 in. 6 ft., 10 in.

C60. RSW: Standard Truck Dimensions
Type Height
Clearance Length Width Inside Turning
Circle Diameter
Pickup
Clearance
Side Loader 13 ft. 32 ft. 10 ft. 62 ft. 17 ft.

Rear Loader 13 ft. 35 ft. 10 ft. 47 ft. 13 ft.

Front Loader 14 ft. 33 ft. 10 ft. 49 ft. 25 ft.

PARK PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
C61. As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a. Title 17, 17.512 Park Dedication / In Lieu (Quimby) Fees, due prior to recordation of the final map. The Quimby fee due for this project is estimated at $63,099. This is based on the subdivision from one 4.87-acre parcel to create 41 new residential lots at an average land value of $135,000 per acre for the South Natomas Community Plan Area, plus an additional 20% for off -site park infrastructure improvements. Any change in these factors will change the amount of the Quimby fee due. The final fee is calculated using factors at the time of payment. The fee is due at the time of the final map.
b. Community Facilities District 2002 -02, Neighborhood Park Maintenance CFD Annexation.

FINANCE
C62. The project site is located within the boundaries of the South Natomas Facilities Benefit Assessment District (FBA). Any future development or land use change on the site will be subject to applicable fees during the building

permit process. If you have questions regarding the South Natomas FBA Fee, please get in touch with Infrastructure Finance at 916-808-1440.

SACSEWER
C63. Prior to the ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phon e at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

C64. Prior to the SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a Level 3 sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appropriate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be do ne in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by SacSewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Exhibit A – Project Plans
Exhibit B – Tentative Map Design Deviation Justifications Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on May 13, 2025, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

D
D
DD
D
D

BUILDING ROOFLINE

BUILDING ROOFLINEBUILDING ROOFLINE

BUILDING ROOFLINE

BUILDING ROOFLINE
SHED
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
D
D
W
S
WELL

OUTFALL

GRAVEL ROAD

15.67'15.67'

26.50'26.50'

DIRT FIELD NO BUILDINGS
LOT 6
405 BM 4
LOT 5
405 BM 4
LOT 4
405 BM 4
LOT 3
405 BM 4
LOT 2
405 BM 4LOT 1
405 BM 4

PARCEL B
DOC #202204271130

PARCEL A
DOC #202204271130 LOT A(PUE)

TERRAVIEW ST

PARKECHANNEL WAY

DAISY RIDGE WAY
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)

EXISTING GRAVEL MAINTENANCE
ROAD

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET
(PUE)

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET
(PUE)

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET
(PUE)
(PUBLIC STREET)
LOT E
(PUE)
123456789
181716151413121110
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
1920212223242526
27 40 39 38 37 36
41 57'

15.67'
N00°29'21"W 426.99'
S89°22'00"W 157.41'
S69°21'39"W 194.43'
N00°24'09"W 448.63'
N81°00'08"E 515.92'
L=174.59', R=500.00'
Δ=20°00'22"
134'
INTERSTATE 80

10.00'PUE

10.83' R/WDEDICATION
PARKEBRIDGE VILLAGE 2
405 BM 4
PARKEBRIDGE VILLAGE 3
415 BM 1

10.00'PUE10.00'PUE

44.00'
PUE

34.67'
PUE

10.00'
PUE

44.00'
PUE

10.00'
PUE

44.00'
PUE

12.50'PUE

12.50'PUE
24'

PARCEL B
202204271130

PARKECHANNEL WAY

80.00' SMUD EASEMENT
2704 O.R. 203

40.00' WAPA

EASEMENT
1709 O.R. 334

34.67'
PUE
120.00' TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT
PER 1709 O.R. 334
200.0' TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT
PER 1709 O.R. 334
11'

10.83' R/WDEDICATION

10.83' R/WDEDICATION
12'
70'
41'
41'
31'
108'
90'
82'
74'
66'
59'
289'289'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
9'
11'
3'
20'
20'
37'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
55'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
11'
3'
3'
55'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
37'
17'17'
372'
64'64'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
63'
137'
137'
362'
18'
362'
18'
362'
43'
372'
43'
54'70'
37'
58'
13'27'60'327'
46'
34'
29'15'56'80'145'125'
109' 24' 59' 60' 60' 57'
24'
40'
40'
40'
57'
88'
11'
35'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
97'
37'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
55'
17'
55'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
72'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
42'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
53'64'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
60'
11'
20'
11'3'
19'
4' 132'
16'
23'
26'
2'
16'8'9' 6'
18'
6'8'9'
10'
57'
100'
55'
55'
33'
62'
118'
118'
59'
59'
100'
136'
15'
41'
28'
8' 13'
45'
28'
22'
17'
9'7'6'
103'
66'
R56'
R20'
R47'
R174'
R200'
R231'
R227'
R200'
R170'
R62' R50'R38'
R62' R50'R38'
R38'R50' R62'
R12'
R63'
R50'
R38'
12'
16'
21'
R62'
R50'
R38'
R122'
R63'R50'R38'49'80'143'121'
12'12'
12'12'

12.7'12'

12.7'12'
12'12'
12'12'

26.5'

30.5'

26.5'

30.5'

26.5'

30.5'

26.5'

15.67'

TYPICAL LOT EXAMPLE
NTS
NOTES

1.FOOTPRINTS ARE HYPOTHETICAL. FINAL PLANS MAY VARY.

2.ALL SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM THE LOT LINE/ROW LINE.

3.ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS MAY PROJECT A MAXIMUM OF
3 FEET INTO REQUIRED FRONT, REAR OR SIDE SETBACK
AREAS; HOWEVER IN NO CASE SHALL SUCH PROJECTION BE
CLOSER THAN 3 FEET TO ANY PROPERTY LINE. AN

ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTION IS DEFINED AS AN ELEMENT

THAT ARTICULATES THE BUILDING ELEVATION SUCH AS MEDIA

NICHES, LIBRARY NICHES, BAY WINDOWS, CHIMNEYS,
BALCONIES AND OTHER SIMILAR ELEMENTS.

4.WINDOW AND DOOR POP-OUT SURROUNDS, POT SHELVES,

ENHANCED WINDOW SILLS, SHUTTER DETAILS, WINDOW TRIM,

ENTRY GATES AND PROJECTING EAVES SHALL BE GOVERNED

BY THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE (UBC).

AC
BM
ESMT
N.A.P.

O.R.

ACRES

BOOK OF MAPS

EASEMENT

NOT A PART

OFFICIAL RECORDS (OF
0 SCALE: 1" =40'
4040 2080

BOUNDARY INFORMATION

PARKEBRIDGE EAST SUBDIVISION

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERING
DECEMBER 2024

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
FOR

CUNNINGHAM ENGINEERING
2120 20TH STREET, SUITE THREE
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95818
(916) 455-2026
250-0010-120
CIVIL ENGINEER:

ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.:

PARCEL AREA:

ZONING:

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:

FLOOD ZONE:

ZONE A99: AREAS WITH A 1% ANNUAL CHANCE

OF FLOODING THAT WILL BE PROTECTED BY A

FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM WHERE

CONSTRUCTION HAS REACHED SPECIFIED LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS. NO DEPTHS OR BASE FLOOD

ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN WITHIN THESE ZONES
PROJECT ADDRESS:

JEN California 25 LLC
1478 STONE POINT DRIVE, SUITE 100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
(916) 335-1329
OWNER:

SACRAMENTO AREA SEWER DISTRICT

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
SEWER:

WATER:

SERVICE PROVIDERS:

DRAINAGE:

PARK & RECREATION:

FIRE PROTECTION:

POLICE PROTECTION:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
ELECTRIC:SMUD
GAS:PG&E

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
SCHOOL DISTRICT:SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED
NOTES:

1.THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF STEVEN J GREENFIELD, RCE C50880.

2.THE EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY INFORMATION IS BASED ON A SURVEY PERFORMED BY MORROW SURVEYING, INC., DATED MARCH 8, 2024.

3.THE SUM OF THE PARTS OF A LINE OR CURVE MAY NOT EQUAL THE WHOLE LENGTH DUE TO ROUNDING DISTANCES.

4.ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, AND EXPRESSED IN UNITED STATES SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.

5.ALL INFORMATION ON THIS MAP IS DEEMED TO BE OF A PRELIMINARY NATURE, AND IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON FOR SURVEY OR PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION.

6.LOTS A AND E SHALL BE GRANTED AS AN I.O.D. TO THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO FOR LANDSCAPE PURPOSES UPON FILING OF THE FINAL MAP.

7.THERE ARE NO EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THIS PROPERTY.

8.THIS SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 41 RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

9.(1) 200' TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT PER 1709 O.R. 334 WITHIN SUBJECT PROPERTY TO REMAIN. (2) SMUD ACCESS EASEMENT PER 2704 O.R. 203 WITHIN SUBJECT PROPERTY TO REMAIN.

10.OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RECORD FINAL PARCEL MAP IN PHASES.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN

THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL A, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF

COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, RECORDED ON
APRIL 27, 2022, DOC #202204271130, SACRAMENTO
COUNTY RECORDS.

EXISTING: RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE
EXISTING: OB-PUD
PROPOSED: R-1A-PUD
LEGEND:

NORTHGATE BOULEVARD
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834

PROPERTY BOUNDARY

RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE

STREET CENTERLINE

PROPOSED PUBLIC

UTILITY EASEMENT

EXISTING EASEMENT

ADJACENT EXISTING

RIGHT OF WAY
LEGEND:

THE BASIS OF BEARINGS OF THIS MAP IS THE
SAME AS THAT SHOWN ON THE "FINAL MAP OF
PARKEBRIDGE VILLAGE 2" FILED IN BOOK 405
OF MAPS AT PAGE 4, SACRAMENTO COUNTY

RECORDERS OFFICE, AND TAKEN AS NORTH
40°11'50" EAST.

BASIS OF BEARINGS:BENCHMARK:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO BENCHMARK NO.

BM-277-F3B.

HILTI NAIL LIGHT BASE SW CORNER
NORTHGATE BLVD. AND TURNSTONE DRIVE.

ELEVATION = 25.82 (NAVD88)
CABLE:COMCAST

4.869± ACRES GROSS

2.768± ACRES NET (RESIDENTIAL LOTS)
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento Office Davis Office
CECWEST.COM
1 PARKEBRIDGE EAST
FOR

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
AI

ROFILAC
N
FO
ETATS
No. C50880
LIVIC
EERG
J.

VETS

REENI GNELANOISSEFORPDERETSIGER
E
NFIE
N
DL
DATE SIGNED:

THESE DRAWINGS ARE NOT

CONSIDERED FINAL UNTIL THE

ENGINEER'S SEAL BELOW HAS
BEEN SIGNED AND DATED.
12/9/24
TSM-1

BOUNDARY INFORMATION

ADDITIONAL TERRAVIEW

STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
I.O.D.
1,861± SQ FT
TYPICAL LOT SIZE:
2,400± SQ. FT.

3.00' 3.00'

5.00'

18.00'

8.00'
PUE

10.00'
PORCH/

FRONT LIVING
SPACE

PRIVATE STREET

SACRAMENTO COUNTY)

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

PORTION
PUE
PTN
A
*

SECTION A
NTS
B
*

PRIVATE STREET
NTS
C
*

SECTION C - TERRAVIEW STREET
NTS
D
*

SECTION D - PARKECHANNEL WAY
NTS

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
LOT
LINE
CENTER
LINE
LOT
LINE

24.7'

12.0' 12.7' 24.0'
8"

2.0'

12.0'
BIKE
PATH
LOT A
(PUE)
LOT B PRIVATE STREET & P.U.E.

10.0'
P.U.E.
8" BARRIER
CURB

VEHICULAR

PAVEMENT
SOUND
WALL
LOT
LINE
CENTER
LINE
LOT
LINE

24.0'

12.0'

LOTS C & D PRIVATE STREET &
P.U.E.

10.0'
P.U.E.

VEHICULAR

PAVEMENT

12.0'

10.0'
P.U.E.

CENTER
LINE

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY

42.2'

EXISTING
ROW

10.0'
EXISTING P.U.E.

PROPOSED
ROW

26.5'15.7'

5.0'10.0'

PLANTER
P.U.E.

EXISTING

CURB TO
REMAIN
WALK

EXISTING

CURB TO
REMAIN

EXISTING
STREET

PAVEMENT

TO REMAIN

EXISTING

WALK TO
REMAIN

EXISTING

PLANTER

TO REMAIN
CENTER
LINE

PROPOSED
ROW

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY

57.0'

26.5'30.5'

PRIVACY

FENCE FOR
LOTS

12.5'

PLANTER
P.U.E.

WIDTH VARIES
LOT E

15.0' 6.5' 5.0'15.0'7.5'8.0'
WALK

PLANTER
(PUE)

PLANTER PLANTERWALK
A
*
B
*
B
*
C
*
D*
120'

40.00' MIN

60.00' MIN
SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #2
TRANSMISSION EASEMENT PER 1709
O.R. 334
NORTHGATE BLVD.

INTERSTATE 80

FONG RANCH RD

PARKECHANNEL WY

RIDGEDAISYWY

TERRAVIEW ST

BERRY BRIDGE RD

ASPENPARKE WY

PROJECT
SITE

VICINITY MAP
NTS

2.0'

DECOMPOSED

GRANITE

5.8'

PLANTER
SMUD EASEMENT PER 2704 O.R. 203

RESTRICTED BUILDING AND USE AREA
80'

PRIVACY

FENCE FOR
LOTS
SUBDIVISION MODIFICATION #1
NOTES:

1.BIKE PATH WIDTH
DECREASES TO 7' MINIMUM

WIDTH AT PARKECHANNEL

WAY TEMPORARY TURN
AROUND.

2.P.U.E. SHALL EXTEND TO
BUILDING FOUNDATION.

ROOF OVERHANG AND

ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING

FEATURES MAY ENCROACH
INTO P.U.E.

NOTE:

P.U.E. SHALL EXTEND TO BUILDING
FOUNDATION. ROOF OVERHANG AND

ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING FEATURES MAY
ENCROACH INTO P.U.E.

E
E
E
E
E
E
SHEET
1 OF 6
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
CECWEST.COM
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET (PUE)

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET (PUE)

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET (PUE)

LOT A - (PUE)
LOT E
(PUE)
E
E
SHEET
2 OF 6

TERRAVIEW STREET

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

SIGHT DISTANCE
SHEET
3 OF 6

PARKECHANNEL WAY

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

SIGHT DISTANCE
E
E
E
E
E
E
SHEET
4 OF 6
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
CECWEST.COM
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET
E
E
E
E
E
E
SHEET
5 OF 6
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
CECWEST.COM
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET
LEGEND

FIRE TRUCK ENTERING THE SITE

TRUCK PROFILE
E
E
E
E
E
E
SHEET
6 OF 6
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
CECWEST.COM
Sacramento Office Davis Office

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET
LEGEND

FIRE TRUCK EXITING THE SITE

TRUCK PROFILE
D
D
DD
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
D
D
W
S

PARKE CHANNEL

DAISY RIDGE WAY

TERRAVIEW STREET
STREET
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 80
LOT 6
405 BM 4
LOT 5
405 BM 4
LOT 4
405 BM 4
LOT 3
405 BM 4
LOT 2
405 BM 4LOT 1
405 BM 4

PARCEL B
DOC #202204271130

PARCEL A
DOC #202204271130
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 18
17 1615
14 13
12 11
10 28
29 30
31 32 33
34 35
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 40
39 38
37 36
41 FF= 14.00PAD=13.33
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
O.R
FF= 14.00PAD=13.33
FF= 14.00PAD=13.33
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office
CECWEST.COM

PARKEBRIDGE EAST

PRELIMINARY GRADING

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CA
PREPARED BY:

CEC CONTACT:

CHARLES KRAFKA
DECEMBER 9, 2024
LOT A

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL STREET

DAISY RIDGE WAY
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
R=200'
R=200'

EXISTING GRAVEL MAINTENANCE
ROAD

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY
(PUBLIC STREET)
LOT E
NOTES

BENCHMARK

FUTURE STREETEXTENSION - BY
OTHERS
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
D
W
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 18
17 1615
14 13
12 11
10 28
29 30
31 32 33
34 35
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 40
39 38
37 36
41 Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office
CECWEST.COM

PARKEBRIDGE EAST

PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CA
PREPARED BY:

CEC CONTACT:

CHARLES KRAFKA
DECEMBER 9, 2024

PARKECHANNEL WAY
(PUBLIC STREET)

LOT A - (PUE)

LOT B PRIVATE STREET (PUE)

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL WAY
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)

EXISTING GRAVEL MAINTENANCE
ROAD
LOT E
(PUE)
LEGEND:

D
S

PARKECHANNEL WAY
NTS
LOT
LINE
CENTER
LINE
LOT
LINE
P.U.E.

P.U.E. P.U.E.

CENTER
LINE

PROPOSED

ROWPROPOSED
ROW

SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY

PLANTER
P.U.E.

LOT E

PLANTER
(PUE)

PRIVATE STREET
NTS

FUTURE STREET EXTENSION - BY
OTHERS

LOT C PRIVATE STREET
(PUE)

LOT D PRIVATE STREET
(PUE)
TRANSMISSION EASEMENT PER 1709
O.R. 334
SMUD EASEMENT PER 2704 O.R. 203
NOTE:

P.U.E. SHALL EXTEND TO BUILDING
FOUNDATION. ROOF OVERHANG AND

ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING FEATURES MAY
ENCROACH INTO P.U.E.

D
D
DD
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
S
S
D
D
W
S

PARKE CHANNEL

DAISY RIDGE WAY

TERRAVIEW STREET
STREET
INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 80
LOT 6
405 BM 4
LOT 5
405 BM 4
LOT 4
405 BM 4
LOT 3
405 BM 4
LOT 2
405 BM 4LOT 1
405 BM 4

PARCEL B
DOC #202204271130
Project Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture 2940 Spafford Street, Suite 200
Davis, CA 95618
(530) 758-2026
2120 20th Street, Suite Three
Sacramento, CA 95818
(916) 455-2026
Sacramento OfficeDavis Office
CECWEST.COM

PARKEBRIDGE EAST

SWQ EXHIBIT

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CA
PREPARED BY: DR
CEC CONTACT:

CHARLES KRAFKA
DECEMBER 9, 2024
LOT A

TERRAVIEW STREET

PARKECHANNEL STREET

DAISY RIDGE WAY
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)
(EXISTING PUBLIC STREET)

EXISTING GRAVEL MAINTENANCE
ROAD

LOT B - PRIVATE STREET

LOT C - PRIVATE STREET

LOT D - PRIVATE STREET

PARKECHANNEL STREET
(PUBLIC STREET)
LOT E

IMPERVIOUS AREA

FUTURE PARKECHANNEL

STREET EXTENSION
(BY OTHERS)

EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN

MEMORANDUM

To: City of Sacramento, Department of Transportation

F
rom: Cunningham Engineering Corporation (CEC)

Date: December 9, 2024

Subject: ParkeBridge East Subdivision - Subdivision Modifications

The purpose of this memo is to provide an explanation as to why subdivisions modifications are deemed necessary for this project.

1. Private Street – Subdivision Modiﬁcation #1
The proposed Private Street section does not meet the City of Sacramento design criteria for a public Alley. The proposed road section for this project has been revised from City standards to accommodate City required back up space for the garages accessed from the alley. This section conforms with the recently constructed Parkebridge Village 4 improvements. Additional modification from City standards may include the use of asphalt pavement with a valley gutter instead of City standard concrete pavement.

2. Parkechannel Way Cross Section – Subdivision Modiﬁcation #2

The proposed Parkechannel Way residential street section does not conform to the City standard Residential Street section. The section as proposed is based on the following direction provided by the City of Sacramento: conform to the recently constructed Parkebridge Village 2 Parkechannel Way cross section, with modification to place right of way line at back of widened sidewalk.

From: J P
To: Jose Quintanilla; Eduardo Madrid Moreno
Subject: Fwd: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris
Date: Saturday, September 7, 2024 8:06:34 AM
Attachments: PARKECHANNEL_WAY_PLANS.pdf
Hi Jose,
The concerns the neighbors had are:
-Will what CM Harris said about a wall being built between Parkebridge and the vacant land still be built per development agreements? I forwarded an email correspondence of a conversation which stated this to Eduardo. The wall should also match the existing height of the sound wall between Parkebridge and i-80, not like the partial height wall at Fong Ranch Park.
-There is already a ton of illegal dumping occuring in the overflow basin on Parkechannel. I imagine this will get worse if a connection to Northgate is built.

-We do not want a new street that connects to Northgate. Neighbors are already concerned about an increase in traffic. The neighborhood off Bridgedord already cuts through Harvest Glen. They will use the new street to get to Northgate/i-80 to bypass Natomas High School traffic. Parkebridge has an existing speed bump, so it'll cause issues if cut-through traffic happens because people will speed to make up for lost time or cut through the other "internal" streets within the neighborhood. I'm a licensed Traffic Engineer who works for a municipality, and I've experienced this many times.
-The proposed elbow already doesnt meet City design guidelines, why make an exception for it when the previous CM said there would be a wall with no connection to Northgate

Thank you for accepting my comments and please keep me updated on the developments. ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From:

District 3 <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris
To: J P
Hello,

Here are the docs.

Please share any feedback or concerns with Jose Quintanilla (
[email protected]) and me!
Best Regards,

Eduardo Madrid Moreno
District Director
Mayor Pro Tem Karina Talamantes - District 3
Direct 916.808.5532
[email protected]
www.karinatalamantes.org
City Hall 915 "I" Street | Sacramento, CA 95814
From: J P
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 11:40 AM
To:

District 3 <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Thank you for that. It's this housing development
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, 11:02
AM District 3 <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello,

Are you referring to the extension of Ninos Parkway along the drainage canal?

If so, here is some information!
Best Regards,

Eduardo Madrid Moreno <[email protected]> Cc: District 3 <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Thanks Eduardo. Would you happen to have any info about the parkebridge east development that just had an application submitted at the end of july? Or any plans you can share? Thank you.

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, 10:22
AM Eduardo Madrid Moreno
<[email protected]> wrote:

This is very useful!
Thank you,
photo Eduardo Madrid Moreno
District Director
Mayor Pro Tem Karina Talamantes - District 3
Direct 916.808.5532
www.karinatalamantes.org/
[email protected]
City Hall 915 "I" Street | Sacramento, CA 95814
From: J P
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2024 8:11 AM
To:

District 3 <[email protected]>; Eduardo Madrid Moreno <[email protected]>
Subject: Fwd: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Hi Eduardo,
Below is an email from CM Harris' officce regarding a wall between Parkebridge and the adjacent lot, in case that is where top golf goes/near future development. Thank you! ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From:

David Gonsalves <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2022, 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris
To: Jerome Pastor
Cc: Jocelyn Navarro <[email protected]
>
Hi Jerome,

Here is what
I have so far:

Hello Parkbridge Neighbors,

Below are a few questions from our meeting recently. As you will notice, a couple of these are going to take a little longer to fully answer. I will follow up once I have more information.

Thank you,
David Gonsalves
City Councilmember Jeff Harris’ Office

1. Question: Can we get a double right turn from west bound San Juan to north bound Truxel. I
t is very slow during busy commute times. We have a double right from Fong Ranch Rd to westbound San Juan.

Answer: Traffic Engineering will investigate and report back.

2. Question: If the developer of the large vacant property between Parkbridge and Northgate Blvd builds commercial on that big property, will they have to put in a wall?

Answer: If they put in commercial, they would be required to erect a soundwall.

3. Question: There is a gap in sidewalk along the east side of Fong Ranch Road across from Discovery High School that runs all the way to San Juan. Can we get sidewalk added to complete the stretch there?

Answer: The property beyond the new sidewalk along Fong Ranch Road is not part of the Parkbridge project, so they are not required to developer the sidewalk from there. The City does not have plans to complete the sidewalk, as that property is owned by the Natomas Unified School District. Also, there is a sidewalk on other side of the street.

4 . Question: Can we plant trees along the soundwall?

Answer: there are trees along the Parkbridge side of the soundwall.

Staff is
researching with Cal Trans to see if we can plant trees on the freeway side of the soundwall.

5 . Question:

The lights along Bridgeway Circle adjacent to the soundwall appear to be dim.

Can we increase their power?

Answer:

City staff are scheduled to inspect the lights to determine if they are operating correctly.

There is currently a backlog for these requests and the lighting maintenance folks are short staffed.

Staff confirmed that the lights were installed
according to current lighting standards for illumination.

From:

Jerome Pastor
Sent:

Thursday, March 10, 2022 11:35 PM
To: David Gonsalves <[email protected]>
Cc: Jocelyn Navarro <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Hi David,

Yes, you can send them to me. Thank you!

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 1:33 PM David Gonsalves <
[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi Jerome,

I hope this email finds you well.

Jocelyn is back from her vacation and is copied on this email.

Question: during the meeting, a number of questions were asked and we are working on the answers.

How can we communicate back to folks who were in the meeting?

Can
we send the answers to you for distribution by the HOA to members?

Other ideas?

Thanks,
David/Jocelyn

From:

Jerome Pastor
Sent:

Friday, February 25, 2022 7:35 AM
To: David Gonsalves <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Good morning David,

Thank you again to you, CM Harris and Cpt. Moore for organizing the meeting last night.

We really appreciate all of your efforts and time spent with this.

In regards to the school district division within our neighborhood, CM Harris stated that "the boundary line can be moved".

He also brought up a good point which got me
thinking that it would be nice if the neighborhood kids could go to school with their friends, especially since almost everyone here is a young family with kids.

Would you happen to have any direct connections with the SCOE or does CM Harris have anyone he can reach out to for improving the chances of this happening?

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:23 AM David Gonsalves
<
[email protected]> wrote:

Jerome, thanks for the info.

Have you thought of running for the President of your
HOA?

We have enjoyed working with you.

Thanks,
David

From:

Jerome Pastor
Sent:

Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:01 AM
To: David Gonsalves <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Hi David,

Thank you for that info.

Parkebridge is split into two HOA's.

Coincidentally, both
presidents are named Varun.

For my community (Parkebridge 1), it is Varun Arora.

For Parkbridge 2, it is Varun Desai.

I am not sure if our president will be attending.

For a lack of a better term, he has gone somewhat "rogue"...

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:15 AM David Gonsalves
<
[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Jerome,

I hope you are well.

The maps bring up another dark time in the schools history for the greater area.

At
one time, there were several school districts (not just NUSD and TRUSD).

Many
of the districts were struggling.

An effort was made to combine them under one

district. That effort created the TRUSD. NUSD elected to stay independent.

I don’t know why the boundary line is down the middle of your neighborhood, and all of South Natomas.

This would be a good question for the Sac County Office of Education (SCOE).

Here is a link to their site:

https://cas5-0-
urlprotect.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?
url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.scoe.net&umid=586e8915-fd7d-405d-bcef- 9b1f9418f44c&auth=0c78d5381d8efeba9ba4477b3ca23a49d0ab462f- 560d6409a7813c9c2e7cc03261f5403c7be6586e

Jerome, can you help me with the name of the head of the Parkbridge HOA?

Thank you,
David

From:

Jerome Pastor
Sent:

Thursday, February 24, 2022 4:55 AM
To: David Gonsalves <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Questions for the Meeting with CM Harris

Hi David,

I have another question to add:

Why is part of our neighborhood in the Natomas school district while the other part is in Twin Rivers? It makes sense for all of us to be in NUSD since the high school is right there on Fong Ranch

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, 4:52 PM Jerome Pastor wrote:

Hi David,

I have a few questions that I was hoping to get some information on during the meeting:

1.) Why do the plans for Fong Ranch Park propose a 6ft wall adjacent to I-80? The existing sound wall for Parkebridge is taller than 6', so this would just look odd and not prevent sound mitigation for people enjoying the park. I spoke to the City's landscape architect and he said that the developer for the future apartments on Fong Ranch may go back in and modify the wall to make the heights match. This does not seem to make sense.

2.) Will any sort of barrier be built to separate the Parkebridge neighborhood from the future parcel to the east (between Northgate and the neighborhood)? Will there be any roads being punched through?

3.) What is the status regarding the safe parking lot for the homeless community that is proposed behind Ihop on Northgate?

4.) There is a lack of lighting along the city trail between I-80 and the neighborhood. Many residents have raised concerns due to dark areas that span 50'-100'. Can additional lights be installed?

Thank you!

Sacramento City CouncilMay 13, 2025

Sacramento City Council
May 13, 2025