2025-00955 Establish Capital Improvement Project, Budgetary Adjustments, and Award Professional Services Agreement for Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600)

City of Sacramento
City Council - 5PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2025-00955 6/24/2025
Establish Capital Improvement Project, Budgetary Adjustments, and Award Professional Services Agreement for Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600) [Published for 10-Day Review 06/12/2025]
File ID: 2025-00955
Location: Franklin Boulevard between Sutterville Road and 38th Avenue, District 5 Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution: 1) authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to establish Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 (T15255600) as a new Capital Improvement Project; 2) authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to increase the revenue and expenditure budget of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600) by $1,157,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704); 3) authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to increase the expenditure budget of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project (T15255600) by transferring $640,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the State and Federal Grant Match Project (T15007200); 4) authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to increase the expenditure budget of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project (T15255600) by transferring $244,307 (Block Grant, Fund 2700) from the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Project (T15165500); 5) awarding a Professional Services Agreement for an amount not to exceed $1,325,822 with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project (T1525600); and 6) authorizing the Interim City Manager or designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement for an amount not to exceed $1,325,822 with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600).

Contact: Megan Johnson, Senior Engineer, (916) 808-1967, [email protected]; Judy Matsui-Drury, Supervising Engineer, (916) 808-7610, [email protected]; Ofelia Avalos, Engineering Services Manager, (916) 808-5054, [email protected]; Department of Public Works
Presenter: None
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution
3-Professional Services Agreement

Page 1 of 5 ends

File ID: 2025-00955 6/24/2025
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The City of Sacramento has completed preliminary design and environmental clearance for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Project, which proposes a lane reduction and active transportation improvements along the entire corridor from Sutterville Road to 38th Avenue.

The segments between Sutterville Road and 32nd Avenue are fully funded as “Phases 1 and 2”, and are currently under construction. The “Phase 3” project, between 32nd Avenue and the city/county limits near 38th Avenue, is the final phase of the larger corridor vision The Phase 3 project has been awarded State funding through the Active Transportation Program for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PSE), and right-of-way services. In addition, the City Council approved $250,000 in funding through the Community Development Block Grant Action Plan. Work began in the larger Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Project, but for project tracking purposes, it will all be included under the Phase 3 CIP.

The establishment of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project will allow for separate tracking of targeted grant funds for the project.

A solicitation for professional services was advertised to competitively select a consulting firm to provide professional services for the preparation of PSE and right-of-way for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project. The panel was comprised of Public Works staff and included qualified engineering services and economic development staff who reviewed the proposal.

Bennett Engineering Services team was recommended as fully qualified to perform the required services. Staff has completed negotiations and recommends awarding and executing a professional services agreement for final design in an amount not-to-exceed $1,325,822.

Policy Considerations: The actions requested herein are consistent with the City’s 2040 General Plan for improving and expanding public safety, creating walkable communities, and enhancing overall livability. Specific goals the project addresses are as follows:

M-1.11 - Increase Bicycling and Walking. The City shall strive to increase bicycling and walking citywide so that it can meet its equity, reduced vehicle miles traveled, and sustainability goals.

The actions requested are also consistent with City Council’s adopted guidelines for transportation funding, meeting the following criteria: safety; maintaining a state of good repair; promoting reductions in vehicle-miles-traveled and greenhouse gas reductions; mobility solutions for youth; and equity.

The Sacramento City Code Section 4.04.020 and the City Council Rules of Procedure (Chapter 7, Section E.2.d) mandate that unless waived by a 2/3 vote of the City Council, all labor agreements and all agreements greater than $1,000,000 shall be made available to the public at least ten (10)

Page 2 of 5 ends

File ID: 2025-00955 6/24/2025
days prior to City Council action. This item was published for 10-day review on June 12, 2025, in compliance with the City Code.

Economic Impacts: None.

Environmental Considerations: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City Council adopted the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Plan on February 4, 2020 (Resolution 2020-0039), which covered all three phases of the project.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The Franklin Boulevard Phase 3 project is state funded.

As part of the development of the broader Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Plan, NEPA clearance was obtained for all three phases of the project. Caltrans issued a Categorical Exclusion for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street project on March 16, 2020.

Sustainability: The proposed project supports City Council’s sustainability priorities. The transportation sector accounts for 57% of community-wide greenhouse gas emissions, the largest single sector in the community. The City’s Climate Action Plan includes several implementation measures to reduce vehicle trips. The project would increase active transportation, reduce vehicular trips, and help ensure more efficient vehicular flow. These actions will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help improve local air quality.

Commission/Committee Action: None.

Rationale for Recommendation: City Council action is required to establish the Capital Improvement Project and approve the budgetary adjustments necessary to deliver the final design phase of work for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project and to award and execute the professional services agreement.

A Request for Proposals for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project was released on July 21, 2024, with proposals due on September 10, 2024. A pre-proposal meeting was held on September 16, 2024, and seven consultants attended. Several firms reviewed the request for proposals. On the due date, one proposal was received, which was submitted by Bennett Engineering.

A panel of City staff from the Department of Public Works and the Office of Innovation and Economic Development reviewed and evaluated the consultant team’s written proposal based upon experience, qualifications, project understanding, and work plan among other factors, and recommends engaging their services.

Approval by the City Council is required to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Bennett Engineering Services Inc.

Page 3 of 5 ends

File ID: 2025-00955 6/24/2025
Financial Considerations: The estimated cost to complete the PS&E phase of work for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 is $1,943,000. Early project establishment activities for the Phase 3 project were included in the larger project, but for better project tracking purposes, staff proposed to transfer the budget and expenses $244,307 (Block Grant, Fund 2700) from the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Project (T15165500) to the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project (T15255600). With that transfer, the establishment of the revenue and expenditure budget of $1,157,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704), and the transfer of $640,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the State and Federal Grant Match Project (T15007200), there will be sufficient funding to award and execute a Professional Services Agreement for an amount not to exceed $1,325,822 with Bennett Engineering Services Inc. for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 and complete the PS&E phase.

There is sufficient funding in the State and Federal Grant Match Project (T15007200) to support the transfer of funds. No General Fund is currently allocated for this project.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): The City has established a minimum 5% participation level for LBEs on this contract. Pursuant to City Code Section 3.60.270, no bidder on this contract shall be considered responsive unless its bid meets or exceeds this minimum participation level.

Bennett Engineering Services Inc. has an office within the City of Sacramento and qualifies as an LBE.

Background The Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project, located on Franklin Boulevard between Sutterville Road/12th Avenue and 32nd Avenue, is the final segment of the Complete Street project which will transform Franklin Boulevard into an active transportation-friendly main street that meets the mobility needs of its underserved residents and supports community economic development and smart growth principles.

This project will provide significant improvements in bicycle and pedestrian facilities and traffic calming to the South City Farms neighborhood and Franklin Boulevard Business District, collectively referred to as the “Franklin District”, an underserved community within a few miles of Downtown Sacramento which has seen little investment over the decades. The Franklin District is home to a low -income, historically-immigrant community which lacks connectivity and mobility options. Although Franklin Boulevard serves as the "main street" for this community, it often operates as a commuter bypass route for State Route 99. Franklin Boulevard currently has four wide travel lanes, no bike lanes, attached sidewalks with no shade, and infrequent pedestrian crossings. This project will improve safety and mobility for users of all ages, incomes, and abilities, and will improve access to schools, community centers, church, shopping, services, and jobs.

The segment between Sutterville Road and 32nd Avenue has completed final design and began construction in Spring 2025. This project has received state funding through a grant from the Active

Page 4 of 5 ends

File ID: 2025-00955 6/24/2025
Transportation Program (Cycle 6) for design and right of way for the Phase 3 segment between 32nd Avenue and the city limits near 38th Avenue, which will complete the full vision of the grassroots-led Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Plan.

The project will include a reduction in travel lanes from four to two with a center turn lane; pavement rehabilitation; Class IV protected bikeways separated from vehicle lanes by vertical curbs and refuge islands; modified traffic signals; and improved pedestrian facilities including crosswalks, pedestrian- scale lighting, buffer planters, shade trees, and accessibility improvements. This project will improve safety and mobility for users of all ages, incomes, and abilities, and will improve access to schools, shopping, services, health care, bus and rail transit, jobs, and many other community resources. The City/County limits are located just south of 38th Avenue, and the limits also run along the centerline of the roadway for a portion of the project limits, with the City of Sacramento to the west and County of Sacramento to the east. The project will conform to the existing four-lane roadway cross-section south of 38th Avenue, within County limits. Preliminary coordination with the County occurred during the preliminary engineering and environmental clearance phase, and prior to the submittal of the grant application for final design. Ongoing coordination with the County will be necessary.

Page 5 of 5 ends

Version Dated 2/6/2024.

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

Establish Capital Improvement Project, Budgetary Adjustments, and Award Professional Services Agreement for Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 (T15255600)

BACKGROUND
A. In February 2020, the City Council approved the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Plan for improvements on Franklin Boulevard between Sutterville Road/12th Avenue and the city/county limits near 38th Avenue and adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (Resolution 2020-0039).

B. The Franklin Boulevard Complete Street plan was separated into three phases of project segments for implementation: Segment 1, between Sutterville Road/12th Avenue and 19th Avenue, and Segment 2, between 19th Avenue and 32nd Avenue, were combined and delivered to construction through the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Project (T15165500); Segment 3, between 32nd Avenue and 38th Avenue, is being delivered separately as the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600).

C. The establishment of a Capital Improvement Project for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 (T15255600) will allow staff to begin the design phase of the project.

D. In accordance with Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures for procurements, a request for proposals (RFP) was advertised on July 21, 2024, for professional services to provide engineering design services for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (“Project”). Based upon the qualifications of the consultant team, staff recommends Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. for the Project. Approval by the City Council is needed to award and execute the professional services agreement with Bennett, Engineering Services, Inc.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to establish the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 (T15255600) as a new Capital Improvement Project.

Version Dated 2/6/2024.

Section 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the revenue and expenditure budgets of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 (T15255600) by $1,157,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704).

Section 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the expenditure budget of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Project (T15255600) by transferring $640,000 (Major Street Construction, Fund 2007) from the State and Federal Grant Match Project (T15007200).

Section 4. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the expenditure budget of the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 project (T15255600) by transferring $244,307 (Block Grant, Fund 2700) from the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street project (T15165500).

Section 5. A Professional Services Agreement is awarded for an amount not-to-exceed $1,325,822 with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600).

Section 6. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute a Professional Services Agreement for an amount not-to-exceed $1,325,822 with Bennett Engineering Services, Inc. for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 3 Project (T15255600).

CONTRACT #: PROJECT: T15165503
CONTRACT NAME: FRANKLIN BLVD COMPLETE ST PHASE 3 NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT: $ 1,325,822.49 AGREEMENT TERM: EXP: 12/31/28 SOLICITATION: P25151111004 AUTHORIZED RENEWALS: - LBE (Y/N):

DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works/Engineering

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

FOR ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,

ENGINEERS, AND LAND SURVEYORS

THIS CONTRACT is made at Sacramento, California, by and between the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a charter city and municipal corporation (“CITY”), and

Bennett Engineering Services Inc
1082 Sunrise Ave, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661-4302
Phone: 916.397.4481 / E-mail: [email protected]

(“CONTRACTOR”), as of the Effective Date, as defined below.

The City and Contractor agree as follows:

1. Effective Date. This Contract shall be effective beginning June 24, 2025.

2. Contract Documents. All exhibits and documents attached or referred to in this Contract are incorporated as if set forth herein, Including Exhibit A (titled “Scope of Services”) and Exhibit B (titled “Payment”).

If there is a conflict between the terms and conditions of any document prepared or provided by the Contractor and made a part of this Contract and the other terms or conditions of the Contract, the other terms and conditions of the Contract control.

3. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall provide to CITY the services described in Exhibit A (“Services”).

CONTRACTOR will not be compensated for services outside the scope of Exhibit A (“Additional Services”) unless, before providing Additional Services: (a) CONTRACTOR notifies CITY and CITY agrees that the Additional Services are outside the scope of Exhibit A; (b) CONTRACTOR estimates the additional compensation required for these Additional Services; and (c) CITY, after notice, approves in writing a Supplemental Contract specifying the Additional Services and the amount of additional compensation to be paid Contractor.

CITY will have no obligations whatsoever under this Contract or any Supplemental Contract, unless and until this Contract or any Supplemental Contract is approved by the City as required by the Sacramento City Code. As used in this Contract, the term “Services” includes both Services and Additional Services as applicable.

Form Approved by City Attorney 2-10-2025 Page 2

4. Payment. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B.

CONTRACTOR shall submit all invoices to CITY in the manner specified in Exhibit B.

5. Facilities and Equipment. Except as set forth below, CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, furnish all facilities and equipment required for CONTRACTOR to perform this Contract.

CITY shall furnish to CONTRACTOR only the facilities and equipment listed below, if any.

6. Insurance. Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain the insurance coverage described in the attached Exhibit C.

7. General Conditions. Contractor shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit D.

8. Additional Requirements for Surveying, Material Testing, and Inspection Services. If this Contract includes any land surveying, material testing, or inspection services provided for a City construction project, during the design, pre-construction, construction, or post- construction phases of the project, the Contractor and any subcontractor or subconsultant performing any such services shall comply with the provisions specified in Exhibit E.

9. Non-Discrimination in Employee Benefits. This Contract may be subject to Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54, Non- Discrimination in Employee Benefits by City Contractors. A summary of the requirements, entitled "Requirements of the Non-Discrimination in Employee Benefits Code (Equal Benefits Ordinance),” can be viewed at:
https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

Contractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands the requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance.

Contractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.54 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

10. Considering Criminal Conviction Information in the Employment Application Process. This Contract may be subject to the requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62, Procedures for Considering Criminal Conviction Information in the Employment Application Process . A summary of the requirements, entitled “Ban-The-Box Requirements,” can be viewed at:

https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

The Ban-The-Box Requirements are applicable to certain contracts with the City in an amount of $250,000 or more (either initial value or total value after amendment) or if the total value of all Contractor's contracts with the City is $250,000 or more over a 12-month period.

Form Approved by City Attorney 2-10-2025 Page 3
Contractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands these requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance. Contractor shall require applicable subcontractors to fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62 and include these requirements in all subcontracts covered by Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62.

Contractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.62 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

11. Local Business Enterprise Program . The Local Business Enterprise Program Participation Requirements ("LBE Participation Requirements") may be applicable to this Contract. A summary of the requirements, entitled "LBE Participation Requirements," can be viewed at:

https://www.cityofsacramento.org/Finance/Procurement/Contract-Ordinances.

Contractor acknowledges and represents that Contractor has read and understands these requirements and shall fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.64. If requested by City, Contractor shall promptly provide any documents and information required by City to verify Contractor's compliance. Contractor shall require applicable subcontractors to fully comply with all applicable requirements of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.64 and include these requirements in all subcontracts covered by Sacramento City Code chapter 3.64.

Contractor's violation of Sacramento City Code chapter 3.64 constitutes a material breach of this Contract, for which the City may terminate the Contract and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

12. Authority. The person signing this Contract for CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that he or she has read, understands, and agrees to all the Contract terms and is fully authorized to sign this Contract on behalf of the CONTRACTOR and to bind the CONTRACTOR to the performance of the Contract’s obligations.

[Signature Pages Follow Exhibits]

Form Approved by City Attorney 2-10-2025 Exhibit A - Page 1

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1. Representatives.

The CITY Representative for this Agreement is:

Megan Johnson / Project Manager
915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916.808.1967 / E-mail: [email protected]

The CONTRACTOR Representative for this Agreement is:

Leo Rubio/ Project Manager
1082 Sunrise Ave, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661-4302
Phone: 916.397.4481 / E-mail: [email protected]

Unless otherwise provided in this Contract, a ll Contractor questions and correspondence pertaining to this Contract must be addressed to the City Representative. All City questions and correspondence must be addressed to the Contractor Representative.

2. Scope of Services. Contractor shall provide Services to City as set forth in Attachment 1 to this Exhibit A.

3. Time of Performance. The Services described in this Contract shall be provided through December 31, 2028 . Contractor shall provide the Services in accordance with any schedule in Attachment 1 to this Exhibit A. Contractor shall immediately notify the City if Contractor is unable to make delivery of Goods or perform Services in compliance with this Contract.

4. Conflict of Interest Requirements. The individual(s) who will provide Services pursuant to this Contract are “Consultants” within the meaning of the Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code: ____ yes __X__ no [check one]

Contractor shall cause the following to occur within 30 days after execution of this Contract:

(A) Identify the individuals who will provide Services or perform Work under this Contract as "Consultants"; and
(B) Cause these individuals to file with the City Representative the "assuming office" statements of economic interests required by the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

Thereafter, throughout the term of the Contract, Contractor shall cause these individuals to file with the City Representative annual statements of economic interests and "leaving office" statements of economic interests, as required by the City's Conflict of Interest Code. The City may withhold all or a portion of any payment due under this Contract or impose fines on the individuals until all required statements are filed.

Scope of Services
Client: City of Sacramento
Consultant: BenneƩ Engineering Services Inc
Project: Franklin Boulevard Complete Street – Phase 3 PS&E Date: December 17, 2024
Consultant’s services shall be limited to those expressly set forth below, and Consultant shall have no other obligations or responsibilities for the Project or to the Client except as agreed to in writing or as provided in this Agreement. All of Consultant’s services in any way related to the Project or Client shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement.

Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 MeeƟngs and Field Review
BEN|EN, in coordination with the City’s project manager, will develop the project development team (PDT) with representatives from subconsultants and appropriate City staff. BEN|EN will setup and facilitate all PDT, interagency, field review, and other project related meetings. The team will prepare all meeting agendas, meeting minutes, necessary supplemental materials, and meeting sign in sheets. BEN|EN assumes a total of twelve (12) formal PDT meetings. BEN|EN will meet with the City’s project manager as required via Teams or in person throughout the project.

Deliverables
MeeƟng noƟces, agendas, minutes, and sign-in-sheets

1.2 Project Schedule
BEN|EN will provide a project schedule using MicrosoŌ Project, showing the acƟviƟes and milestones outlined in our project scope. The acƟviƟes will show beginning and ending dates, duraƟon, and dependency on other tasks. This schedule will follow the criƟcal path method and will be updated on a monthly basis and as decisions are made throughout the life of the project. The BEN|EN project manager will uƟlize this criƟcal path schedule to manage the eﬀort of the team to ensure on-Ɵme submiƩals.

Deliverables
Project Schedule

1.3 Project Budget, Invoicing, Status Reports
A project budget will be established and managed in collaboraƟon with the City’s Project Manager for successful project delivery. A draŌ status report will be submiƩed for City approval prior to submiƩal of the ﬁrst invoice. BEN|EN will prepare and submit monthly invoices and status reports to the City. The status reports will include project tasks completed, deliverables submiƩed, and budget expenditures for that month’s invoice. Invoices will include employee rates, expenses per task, and a copy of any subconsultant invoices, in 10-H format in accordance with City and Caltrans guidelines.

Deliverables
DraŌ Status Report, Monthly Invoices, and Status Reports

ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT A

1.4 Agency CoordinaƟon
Our Project Manager will inform the City’s Project Manager of all coordinaƟon eﬀorts with outside agencies, including Sacramento County, prior to any meeƟng with an outside agency or organizaƟon. Our Project Manager will work with our team’s public outreach lead to document decision making and communicaƟon with the technical team, stakeholders, and the community at large.

Deliverables
CoordinaƟon eﬀorts as needed for meeƟngs, permits, and other project related tasks.

1.5 Quality Control Plan
The team will prepare a quality control plan - uƟlizing both our exisƟng internal controls and the guidelines as set by the City of Sacramento - and we will provide technical resources necessary to ensure that deliverables are complete, and that they meet the City’s requirements. Reviews will be conducted by experienced staﬀ not directly involved with the design or preparaƟon of the deliverables. The review will be documented using a review form indicaƟng the reviewer’s name, date of review, and the resoluƟon of any comments. This task includes providing quality control reviews for the Project Report, 60%, 90%, and 100% PS&E submiƩals.

Deliverables:

Quality Control Review Form

Task 2.0 Data CollecƟon, Mapping, and Surveying

2.1 Topographic Survey and Base Mapping
UNICO will perform supplemental topographic surveying and mapping as required for ﬁnal design. UNICO will work with the design team to idenƟfy supplemental topographic surveying needs. AnƟcipated surveys include driveway conforms, pavement slopes, curb, guƩer and sidewalk connecƟons, uƟliƟes, ADA path of travel, and full detail at curb ramps for ADA upgrade and compliance. UNICO will map all topographic features in AutoCAD format to include full mapping, 1’ contours and DTM 3D surface. All supplemental surveying and mapping will be meshed into the previous topographic survey base ﬁle for ﬁnal design.

UNICO will set durable control points to be preserved for uƟlizaƟon of surveys and for future construcƟon controls.

Deliverables:

AutoCAD Base File
Point Files

Task 3.0 Geotechnical Engineering

3.1 Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) Survey
Geocon will perform the following:

Obtain encroachment permits from the City of Sacramento and the County of Sacramento to perform exploratory excavaƟons in the City and County right-of-way. Since this is a City project, we assume that any fee for the permit will be waived.

Mark the project limits in white paint and provide a two business day noƟﬁcaƟon to Underground Service Alert (USA) prior to job site mobilizaƟon.

Advance up to ten (10) soil borings along the shoulders of both sides of Franklin Boulevard at locaƟons of potenƟal soil disturbance using hand-auger sampling equipment. We will collect soil samples at depth intervals of 0 to 1 and 1 to 2 feet from each boring. We will collect soil samples from the hand auger and transfer to Ziploc® re-sealable plasƟc bags. We will homogenize the samples in the ﬁeld and subsequently label them, place them in an ice chest, and deliver them to the analyƟcal laboratory under standard chain-of- custody documentaƟon. We will backﬁll the borings with the excavated soil materials. We will note general soil types encountered in the borings on the daily ﬁeld log.

Perform quality assurance/quality control procedures during the ﬁeld exploraƟon acƟviƟes. These procedures will include decontaminaƟon of sampling equipment before each sample is collected and provide chain-of- custody documentaƟon for each soil sample submiƩed to the laboratory. We will decontaminate the soil sampling equipment between each sample by washing the equipment with an Alconox® soluƟon followed by a double rinse with deionized water. We will discharge the rinseate water to ground surface areas which do not slope to drainage inlets or surface water bodies.

Analyze each soil sample for total lead following United States Environmental ProtecƟon Agency (USEPA) Test Method 6010B (20 samples).

Analyze samples with total lead concentraƟons between 50 and 1,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for soluble lead using the Waste ExtracƟon Test (WET) method, USEPA Test Method 7000, where necessary (assume up to eight (8) samples).

Analyze soil samples with total lead concentraƟons greater than 1,000 mg/kg for Toxic CharacterisƟc Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for soluble lead, where necessary (assume up to four (4) samples).

Prepare a report to present our ﬁndings and conclusions. The report will include the following:

IntroducƟon/project descripƟon
Vicinity Map and Site Plan showing boring locaƟons
InvesƟgaƟve methods
InvesƟgaƟve results and ﬁeld observaƟons
StaƟsƟcal analysis of the data
Conclusions and recommendaƟons
Appendices including laboratory reports and chain-of-custody documentaƟon

3.2 Geotechnical Pavement EvaluaƟon
Geocon will evaluate the exisƟng pavement and subsurface condiƟons along the project alignment and provide geotechnical design and construcƟon recommendaƟons for the project as presently proposed. Our invesƟgaƟon will include a limited geologic/geotechnical literature review, ﬁeld exploraƟon, geotechnical laboratory tesƟng, engineering analysis, and report preparaƟon.

Geocon will complete the following:

Perform a limited geologic/geotechnical literature review and review any as-built informaƟon for the site and vicinity.

Perform a site reconnaissance to observe exisƟng condiƟons and mark out exploratory locaƟon for subsequent uƟlity clearance.

NoƟfy subscribing uƟlity companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working-days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavaƟons at the site.

Obtain encroachment permits from the City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento to perform exploratory excavations in the City and County right-of-way. Since this is a City project, we assume that any fee for the permit will be waived.

Perform up to ﬁve (5) pavement cores at selected locaƟons along the project alignment to evaluate as-built pavement condiƟons within the roadway.

As an opƟonal task, we will perform up to two (2) exploratory borings near the new traﬃc signal locaƟon to aid in providing cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) concrete pier recommendaƟons. Borings will be performed using a truck-mounted drill rig equipped with solid-ﬂight or hollow-stem augers.

Provide necessary traﬃc control measures during ﬁeldwork.

Measure the exisƟng pavement secƟon material thicknesses at each core and boring (if any) locaƟon.

Obtain soil samples from selected core and boring (if any) locaƟons.

Upon compleƟon, backﬁll and patch the cores in accordance with City of Sacramento encroachment permit requirements. If allowed by the City, we will patch the cores with cold-patch asphalt or rapid-set concrete.

However, the City may require a more extensive repair consisƟng of a minimum 2’ x 2’ square sawcut, removal of exisƟng asphalt, and re-paving with new HMA. If this is required, addiƟonal fees will apply for this repair operaƟon and addiƟonal traﬃc control. We have included this repair as an opƟonal task with an approximate fee only.

Perform laboratory tests to evaluate perƟnent geotechnical parameters.

Prepare a summary report with our conclusions and recommendaƟons. Our report will include (but not be limited to) the following:

Site Plan showing locaƟons of pavement cores and exploratory borings (if any) Logs of the borings (if any)
DescripƟon of subsurface condiƟons and photos of pavement condiƟons ExisƟng pavement structural secƟon material thicknesses at the core locaƟons Laboratory test results
AnƟcipated excavaƟon characterisƟcs and grading/earthwork recommendaƟons Concrete sidewalk, curb, and guƩer recommendaƟons
Pavement repair/rehabilitaƟon recommendaƟons
New pavement design secƟon recommendaƟons
CIDH concrete pier foundaƟon design recommendaƟons (if necessary) Screening level soil corrosion evaluaƟon
ConstrucƟon consideraƟons
We will submit a draŌ report for review. We will address any comments prior to ﬁnalizing the report.

Task 5.0 UƟlity Data CollecƟon
Based upon our review of the project site, signiﬁcant private and public uƟliƟes exist throughout the project limits. Some can either remain or be protected in place while others will have to be relocated or adjusted to grade as appropriate. We will use the methods outlined below to coordinate and idenƟfy potenƟal conﬂicts.

5.1 UƟlity Conﬂict Mapping
The team will be responsible for uƟlity coordinaƟon throughout the project development. UƟlity “A” LeƩers will be sent by the team and responses logged and mapped. Our team will idenƟfy uƟlity impacts and will provide a summary of impacted uƟliƟes with proposed resoluƟons. UƟlity conﬂict maps will be generated for each impacted uƟlity.

Deliverables
UƟlity “A” LeƩers
UƟlity Conﬂict Maps

5.2 Subsurface UƟlity Engineering and Potholing
MTCo will conduct private uƟlity detecƟon and marking services to provide SUE Quality Level B (QL-B) surface markings for underground uƟliƟes shall be derived from electromagneƟc inducƟon and GPR readings. Findings will be documented in the ﬁeld using Paint, Flags, and/or whiskers. UƟliƟes will be marked in Pink, idenƟfying them as survey marking and doƩed in USA color code. Depths will be added wherever possible, depending on signal received by the EM locator or GPR. Any issues will be reported to the client and documented in the report.

Based on the above invesƟgaƟons, we will work with the City and private uƟlity providers to determine the number of potholes required to adequately locate the uƟliƟes along the corridor. The team has included a total of forty (40) potholes.

Deliverables:

Link to an online 360 plaƞorm to review images
SUE Report
Potholing with results and locations of utilities

5.3 Potholing Survey
UNICO will work with the design and potholing teams to provide potholing support. Upon compleƟon of potholing, UNICO will mobilize to locate all pothole locaƟons. It is expected that the pothole team will mark the potholes in the ﬁeld by means of paint, nails, stakes, and reference markers and will provide ﬁeld notes and sketches of each pothole. UNICO will survey each pothole and provide the horizontal and verƟcal locaƟon of each pothole for inserƟon into the topographic base ﬁle.

Deliverables:

Pothole Surveys and LocaƟons

5.4 UƟlity CoordinaƟon
Our team will prepare a Report of InvesƟgaƟon (ROI) document that idenƟﬁes the City’s liability for relocaƟon costs. During Final Design, we will request relocaƟon plans from uƟlity companies requiring relocaƟon. Once the uƟlity owner provides their claim of liability, our team will closely coordinate with uƟlity companies and the city to ﬁnalize relocaƟon plans as appropriate. If monies will exchange hands or the City is liable for any porƟon of the relocaƟons, a UƟlity Agreement (UA) will be prepared and sent to the owner along with the NTO. UƟlity agreements will be needed for water and sewer faciliƟes owned by the DOU.

The claim of liability leƩers, signed relocaƟon plans, draŌ ROI, NTO, and UA will need to be sent to the Caltrans District UƟlity Coordinator for review and approval, prior to sending the documents to the uƟlity owner. Therefore, the team will prepare the necessary uƟlity documents for Caltrans review and approval.

This will follow the “A, B, C” UƟlity Process, including but not limited to:

IdenƟfying uƟlity conﬂicts
FacilitaƟng relocaƟon designs
Obtaining commitments for relocaƟon schedules
IdenƟfying and coordinaƟng uƟlity easements
Should any relocaƟon of private uƟlity faciliƟes be required, it is assumed that we will coordinate with private uƟlity companies for proposed relocaƟon within exisƟng or new City right-of-way. In addiƟon, it is assumed that no new water or sewer faciliƟes will be constructed as part of the project.

AssumpƟons:

Two (2) UƟlity Agreements needed for DOU water and sewer relocaƟons Deliverables:

ROIs, NTO, UƟlity Agreements
Summary of impacts and resoluƟons

Task 6.0 CEQA/NEPA RevalidaƟon
If it is determined that environmental document revalidaƟon is required, ESA will prepare documentaƟon to support a revalidaƟon of the CEQA and NEPA documents previously approved for the project in 2018 and 2020, respecƟvely.

6.1 Review of DocumentaƟon and RevalidaƟon Scoping:

ESA will work with the City of Sacramento and Caltrans to conﬁrm the appropriate level of invesƟgaƟons and documentaƟon that would be required to revalidate the environmental approvals for the project. ESA will review the previous environmental documents, prepared by ESA, and supporƟng technical studies for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street project to idenƟfy if any proposed changes to the project could require addiƟonal documentaƟon to maintain the validity of the original CEQA MiƟgated NegaƟve DeclaraƟon (MND) and/or the NEPA Categorical Exclusion (CE) determinaƟon.

ESA will idenƟfy any changes in the project engineering/design, changes to the environmental seƫng/circumstances, changes in the nature and severity of environmental impacts, or changes to environmental commitments that could require addiƟonal invesƟgaƟon and/or supplemental documentaƟon.

A brief memo documenƟng the results of the review and any recommendaƟons for addiƟonal invesƟgaƟons or documentaƟon will be completed and provided to the City and Caltrans for their consideraƟon in conﬁrming what, if any, invesƟgaƟons and documentaƟon would be required, and to support their revalidaƟon of their respecƟve CEQA and NEPA determinaƟons for the project.

ESA will lead one coordinaƟon meeƟng with Caltrans Local Assistance Environmental staﬀ and one coordinaƟon meeƟng with City Environmental staﬀ to discuss the recommendaƟons in the memo and obtain their respecƟve concurrence on any invesƟgaƟons and documentaƟon to be prepared to support their respecƟve revalidaƟons.

Deliverables:

RevalidaƟon Scoping Memo
MeeƟng with Caltrans Environmental Staﬀ
MeeƟng with City Environmental Staﬀ

6.2 InvesƟgaƟons and DocumentaƟon
Upon obtaining concurrence from Caltrans and City Environmental staﬀ on what supplemental documentaƟon may be required to support the revalidaƟons, ESA will complete the required invesƟgaƟons and documentaƟon. Based on a preliminary review of the previously prepared CEQA and NEPA documents, it is expected that supplemental invesƟgaƟons and documentaƟon would consist of:

Updated database searches for biological resources, cultural resources and hazardous materials to idenƟfy any newly listed species or new known occurrences of special status species that may be present in or near the project area, new known presence of cultural resources, or new incidences of release of hazardous materials in or near the project area.

For NEPA revalidaƟon, preparaƟon of the NEPA secƟons of a Caltrans NEPA/CEQA RevalidaƟon Form summarizing the results of supplemental invesƟgaƟons and documenƟng the NEPA Conclusion for the project. It is assumed that the NEPA Conclusion will be “The original environmental document or CE remains valid. No further documentaƟon will be prepared.”
For CEQA revalidaƟon, preparaƟon of a brief Addendum to the MND to either address minor technical changes or addiƟons to the approved MND, or to document that no condiƟons have occurred that would require preparaƟon of supplemental CEQA document.

Deliverables:

Caltrans NEPA/CEQA RevalidaƟon Form
MND Addendum
AssumpƟons:

The project descripƟon and design, footprint, purpose, and need will not substanƟally change from what was previously evaluated in the CEQA and NEPA documents previously prepared for the project.

The project would remain included in the conforming Regional TransportaƟon Improvement Program and would conƟnue to not meet the deﬁniƟon of a Project of Air Quality Concern (POAC); as a result, addiƟonal air quality analysis and conformity consultaƟon would not be required.

Task 7.0 Public and Stakeholder Outreach

7.1 Building Awareness
Building on the successful Complete Streets Branding developed during Phase 1 and 2, the BEN|EN team will revise the exisƟng fact sheet with updates on the preferred right-of-way conﬁguraƟon, and construcƟon Ɵmeline. Graphically rich and engaging, the fact sheet will be translated into Spanish and Hmong, at minimum, and will be printed and distributed at all events and placed on the city’s project webpage.

AddiƟonally, web and social media content, graphics, and potenƟally interacƟve quizzes will be developed as part of the Franklin Complete Streets project. The BEN|EN team counts on an in-house graphics and bilingual communicaƟons team that can produce eye-catching graphics and resonant messages for posƟng on oﬃcial city web and social media accounts and on partner pages including La Familia Counseling Center, and the Franklin Boulevard Business District.

Community Guide – At the end of the engagement process, The BenneƩ Team will develop a graphically rich community guide. Diﬀerent from a fact sheet, a community guide typically is printed on an 11x17 paper that is then folded into a 4-page booklet. This expanded format serves to highlight the improvements of an enƟre corridor like Franklin.

Deliverables:

Updated Fact Sheet
Updated FAQ Sheet
Web and Social Media Content
Community Guide

7.2 Engaging the Community
Community, Pop-up Events – MIG will be available to aƩend up to four (4) Community pop-up events throughout the duraƟon of the project to provide project updates and informaƟon. The materials for each of the pop-up events – including posters can also be used for other in-the-community events like posadas or fairs or school events.

Deliverables:

Community Pop-up Events and Materials

7.3 ConnecƟng with Businesses
Driveway Access Brieﬁngs – Building on the leader interviews, we propose seƫng up Driveway Access Brieﬁngs with impacted business and property owners. These brieﬁngs again are intended as direct, in-person, on-site opportuniƟes to engage with a set of businesses that share a locaƟon or access point. A potenƟal implementaƟon framework would be to split up the corridor into two segments and treat each side on the east and west as a speciﬁc study area. Thus, a total of 4 Driveway Access Brieﬁngs would take place at each locaƟon and would include “walkshop” components where parƟcipants and project team members walk the site to discuss concerns or ideas.

Business Forum – The culminaƟon of the outreach is proposed as a business round-table co-hosted by the Franklin Blvd Business district. The BEN|EN team would coordinate content presentaƟon that would synthesize the key ideas heard and the consensus developed for each of the 12 Driveway Access Brieﬁngs.

PresentaƟons on the Driveway Access issues, or resoluƟons would be a key feature. Other forum components will include an overview of the general Complete Streets Plan, and preference-seƫng acƟviƟes related to the arts, landscaping, and business corridor idenƟty. Task assumes that one (1) meeƟng will be hosted via MicrosoŌ Teams.

Deliverables:

Driveway Access Brieﬁngs Materials
Business Forum Materials

Task 8.0 PS&E Development

8.1 Basis of Design Memorandum
BEN|EN will prepare the Basis of Design Technical Memorandum for City review. The memo will idenƟfy the Project requirements, key constraints, and the applied design decisions consistent with the following:

City of Sacramento Design and Procedures Manual
City of Sacramento Standard Drawings
City of Sacramento Pedestrian Crossing Guidelines
County of Sacramento Design Standards
Caltrans DIB 89-01 – Class IV Bikeway Guidance
NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide
NACTO Designing for All Ages and AbiliƟes
NACTO Don’t Give Up at the IntersecƟon
MUTCD
Deliverables:

DraŌ and Final Basis of Design Memo

8.2 Concept Reﬁnement and 30% Plans
In coordinaƟon with the City, the BEN|EN team will analyze the project concept based on cost, pedestrian and bicyclist accessibility, safety, environmental impacts, project phasing, and right-of-way and uƟlity impacts to obtain consensus on the conﬁguraƟon and extent of the project. This analysis will include review of design features (such as lane widths, bike lane widths, potenƟal buﬀers, sidewalk repairs, new signalized intersecƟons, and intersecƟon modiﬁcaƟons) that could potenƟally be reﬁned to avoid signiﬁcant impacts.

MTCo and Fehr & Peers will review design details for the protected intersecƟon treatments and provide recommendaƟons for potenƟal reﬁnements.

Deliverables:

Concept Reﬁnement Roll Plot in PDF
30% Plans and EsƟmate in PDF

8.3 Driveway Variance Memorandum
Similar to Phase 2, we will complete a driveway standards variance matrix detailing which exisƟng driveways along the corridor do not meet City code. See aƩached draŌ Driveway Exhibits A and B for reference. This will allow us to coordinate with the Traﬃc Department on design opƟons and seek variances if necessary. These variances will be included in a matrix and idenƟﬁed in the Driveway Variance Memorandum. (See draŌ Driveway Exhibits A and B for reference on pages 15 through 17.) Deliverables:

Driveway Standards Matrix
Driveway Variance Memorandum

8.4 Project Report Update
BEN|EN will update the Project Report to include updated design, budget, schedule, outreach eﬀorts, and any uƟlity or perƟnent informaƟon for Phase 3.

Deliverables:

DraŌ and Final Project Report

8.5 Drainage Report
BEN|EN will develop a drainage report for the proposed improvements in compliance with City and County Standards and the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. We will coordinate miƟgaƟon required for any increase in impervious area with DOU. The improvements will be analyzed with the raƟonal method to determine proper inlet spacing to avoid runoﬀ spread into the traveled lanes. Phase 3 improvements will likely be required to implement Low Impact Development and Treatment Control Measures per the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. However, the project is located in an area exempt from implemenƟng hydromodiﬁcaƟon measures. Treatment opƟons will take the soil inﬁltraƟon rates into account. The calculaƟons will include tributary areas, pipe sizing, peak ﬂow velociƟes, peak ﬂow rate, hydraulic grade lines, spread widths at inlets, water quality volume (WQV) and water quality ﬂow (WQF) for treatment alternaƟves.

Deliverables:

DraŌ and Final Drainage Report

8.6 Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSDCR)
Fehr & Peers will prepare a TSDCR that includes the exisƟng traﬃc signal at Franklin Boulevard and 38th Avenue. It is assumed that the signal improvements to the intersecƟon of Franklin Boulevard and 36th Avenue will happen as part of a separate project. Beyond what is being constructed with Phase 2, addiƟonal improvements to the Franklin Blvd / Fruitridge Road signal are not anƟcipated as part of this project. Any comments from the 30% design review will be incorporated in the TSDCR. The TSDCR will contain the following elements for the study intersecƟons.

Traﬃc analysis results from the original Franklin Boulevard Complete Streets Plan traﬃc operaƟons analysis (new traﬃc counts are not anƟcipated as part of this eﬀort):

IntersecƟon turning movement volumes (exisƟng, plus project, and cumulaƟve plus project) IntersecƟon delay/Level of Service (LOS)
95th-percenƟle queuing
DescripƟon of planned intersecƟon improvements such as:

Traﬃc signal operaƟon (e.g., signal phasing, detecƟon, pre-empƟon) Movements allowed at the intersecƟon
Appropriate design vehicle type for turning movements
IntersecƟon lane geometrics
Pedestrian and bicycle faciliƟes
Exhibits of conceptual signal layouts for the modiﬁcaƟons at the exisƟng signalized intersecƟons.

For the exisƟng signalized intersecƟon, we will describe the features that do not meet current City standards such as pedestrian pushbuƩons, pedestrian signal faces, and traﬃc signal head placement that may need to be upgraded as part of the project.

Exhibits showing design vehicle turning movement envelopes for the modified traffic signal.

Deliverables:

DraŌ and Final Traﬃc Signal Concept Reports

8.7 60% Plans and EsƟmate
Based on approved Preliminary Engineering Plans, the BEN|EN team will prepare 60% PS&E uƟlizing AutoCAD, City of Sacramento Design Standards, County of Sacramento Design Standards and applicable building codes.

ConstrucƟon Drawings shall include:

Title Sheet
General Notes
Typical Cross SecƟons
Key Map and Survey Control
DemoliƟon Plans
Plan and Proﬁle
Driveway Details
ConstrucƟon Details
Drainage Plans
Drainage Proﬁles
Drainage Details
UƟlity Plans
UƟlity Proﬁles
ConstrucƟon Area Signs
Pavement DelineaƟon and Sign Plans
Landscape Material Plans (hardscape and Monument signage) Landscape Layout Plans
IrrigaƟon Plans and Details
PlanƟng Plans and Details
Traﬃc Signal Plans
Traﬃc Signal Details
Deliverables:

PDF of the Plans (22” x 34”), SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmate SubmiƩal through Sacramento County SIPS
Response to Comments Matrix

8.8 90% Plans, SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmate (PS&E)
The team will prepare and submit Plans, SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmates to the City and County for review and comment as detailed above.

Deliverables:

PDF of the Plans (22” x 34”), SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmate SubmiƩal through Sacramento County SIPS
Response to Comments Matrix

8.9 Plan and Constructability Review
Mark Thomas & Co. (MTCo) will review the design plans (60% and 90% design submiƩals) focused on intersecƟon treatments for bicycle and pedestrian faciliƟes, signing, striping, and conﬂict zones. The review will evaluate the project elements for the level of user comfort, right-of-way impacts, cost, and level of vehicle-bicycle conﬂicts. The intent of the review is to assist the design team in assigning appropriate intersecƟon treatments within a variety of contexts along the corridor as well as ensuring tradeoﬀs are balanced with a consistent approach corridor-wide.

MTCo will perform a constructability based on the 90% PS&E. The constructability review will include:

General review of the plans to conﬁrm elements can be constructed as shown Consistency between plans, specs, and esƟmates
IdenƟfy potenƟal issues with right of way or uƟlity conﬂicts Check for suﬃcient direcƟon to contractor for coordinaƟon with outside stakeholders (RT, property owners, uƟlity owners, etc.)
Development of a preliminary construcƟon schedule to conﬁrm working days Deliverables:

Comment review matrix at 60% and 90% PS&E
Constructability Review comment matrix
ConstrucƟon Schedule and working days

8.10 100% PS&E
The team will prepare and submit Plans, SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmate to the City for review and comment as detailed above.

Deliverables:

PDF of the Plans (22” x 34”), SpeciﬁcaƟons, and EsƟmate SubmiƩal through Sacramento County SIPS
AutoCAD ﬁles
Response to Comments matrix
Final plan submiƩal will be stamped and signed by a CA registered PE.

8.11 LAPM Forms
BEN|EN and team will assist the City with compleƟng the required Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) forms as the project progresses through Caltrans including: 3-A, 9-D, 13-B, 14-A, 14-B, 14-C, 14-D, 14- E, and 14-F.

Deliverables:

LAPM Forms in PDF

8.12 ATP Counts
BEN|EN will perform the pre and post construcƟon pedestrian and bicycle user counts as required for the ATP grant.

Deliverables:

Pre-ConstrucƟon ATP Count
Post-ConstrucƟon ATP Count

Task 9 Grant ApplicaƟon Support
BEN|EN will assist the City with the grant applicaƟons for construcƟon funding, including but not limited to the State and SACOG ATP grants. Support will include preparing exhibits, esƟmates, other supporƟng documents, and review of narrative prepared by the City.

Deliverables:

Exhibits, esƟmates, and research for State and SACOG ATP grants

Task 10 Bidding Assistance
The team will provide assistance to the City during bidding of the project. This will include answering quesƟons from prospecƟve bidders, assisƟng the City in the preparaƟon of addenda during the adverƟsement period, and providing clariﬁcaƟon of the construcƟon documents.

10.1 Pre-Bid MeeƟng
BEN|EN will aƩend a pre-bid meeƟng and address technical issues that may arise at the meeƟng.

10.2 Bidder Inquiries
The team will be available to support the City by providing answers to Contractor inquiries and responding in wriƟng as appropriate.

10.3 PreparaƟon of Addenda
The team will prepare addenda to contract documents as necessary and will be available to support the City by preparing addenda as a result of inquiries.

Deliverables
Correspondence and Addenda to contract documents

Task 11 Permiƫng
Our team will maintain communicaƟon and coordinaƟon with all agencies idenƟﬁed in the Project Report for the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street RehabilitaƟon Project. These include, but are not limited to, the State Water Resource Control board for a NoƟce of Intent (NOI) for a Storm Water PolluƟon PrevenƟon Plan (SWPPP) permit, and any addiƟonal support to the City with preparing permit applicaƟons for the project.

Form Approved by City Attorney 2-10-2025 Exhibit B - Page 1

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT

1. CONTRACTOR’s Compensation. The total of all fees paid to the CONTRACTOR for the provision of Services as set forth in Exhibit A, including any authorized reimbursable expenses, shall not exceed the total sum of $ 1,325,822.49. The payments specified in this Exhibit B shall be the only payments made to Contractor unless the City approves a Supplemental Contract.

2. Billable Rates. Contractor shall be paid for the performance of Services on an hourly rate, daily rate, flat fee, lump sum, or other basis, as set forth in Exhibit A or Attachment 1 to this Exhibit B and any applicable special provisions included in the request for bids or proposals. If there is a conflict between Exhibit A or Exhibit B and the Special Provisions, Exhibit A or Exhibit B controls.

3. CONTRACTOR’s Reimbursable Expenses. “ Reimbursable Expenses” are limited to actual expenditures of CONTRACTOR for expenses that are necessary for the proper satisfaction of the Contract and are only payable if specifically authorized in advance in writing by the City. No charges or markup will be allowed unless specified in the Contract, including charges for travel and transportation.

4. Payments to CONTRACTOR. Contractor is responsible for supplying all documentation necessary to verify invoices to the City’s satisfaction.

A. Payments to CONTRACTOR shall be made within a reasonable time after receipt of CONTRACTOR’s invoice, in proportion to services performed or as otherwise specified in Attachment 1 to Exhibit B. CONTRACTOR may request payment on a monthly basis.

CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the cost of supplying all documentation necessary to verify the monthly billings to the satisfaction of CITY.

B. Invoices must be submitted to either of the addresses specified below. (1) Email. Submit email invoices and any attachments to:
[email protected]

(2) Postal Mail. If emailing is not an option, mail to:

A/P Processing Center
City of Sacramento
915 I Street, Floor 4
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
C. All invoices submitted by CONTRACTOR must contain the following information:

(1) Job/Project Name
(2) CITY’s current Purchase Order Number
(3) CONTRACTOR’s Invoice Number
(4) Date of Invoice Issuance
(5) Work Order Number (if applicable)
(6) CITY representative identified on the Purchase Order

Form Approved by City Attorney 2-10-2025 Exhibit B - Page 2 (7) CONTRACTOR’s remit address
(8) Description of services billed under Invoice
(9) Amount of Invoice (itemize all authorized Reimbursable Expenses) (10) Total Billed to Date under Contract (if applicable)

D. Items must be separated into Services and Reimbursable Expenses. Invoices that do not conform to the format outlined above will be returned to CONTRACTOR for correction.

CITY is not responsible for delays in payment to CONTRACTOR resulting from CONTRACTOR’s failure to comply with the invoice format described above.

5. Additional Services. Additional Services shall be provided only when a Supplemental Contract authorizing the Additional Services is approved in writing by the City in accordance with the City’s contract amendment procedures. The City reserves the right to perform any Additional Services with its own staff or to retain other contractors to perform the Additional Services.

6. Accounting Records of CONTRACTOR. During performance of this Contract and for a period of three years after completion of performance, CONTRACTOR shall maintain all accounting and financial records related to this Contract , in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices, including records of Contractor’s costs for performance under this Contract and records of Contractor’s Reimbursable Expenses. Contractor shall keep and make records available for inspection and audit by representatives of the CITY upon reasonable written notice.

7. Tax Payments. CONTRACTOR shall pay, when and as due, any and all taxes incurred as a result of CONTRACTOR’s compensation hereunder, including estimated taxes, and shall provide CITY with proof of the payment upon request. CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to indemnify CITY for any claims, losses, costs, fees, liabilities, damages or injuries suffered by CITY arising out of CONTRACTOR’s breach of this section.

1 Last Updated 7/24/14

ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBIT B

I. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT

A. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for services at the specific rate of compensation in the approved 10‐H Form(s). Unless specifically identified as some other method, the specified rates shall include direct/base hourly rate, fringe benefits, overhead, and profit.

B. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed for Other Direct Costs (ODC), at rates as identified on the approved 10‐H Form(s) with receipts for actual costs. Please refer to 10‐H instructions for guidelines on reimbursable costs.

C. If applicable, CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wages to those workers employed on public works contracts performing applicable duties as required by the State Labor Code and City Code 3.60.180. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for any future adjustments to prevailing wage rates including, but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations.

Based on prevailing adjustments, CONSULTANT may request an adjustment in the rate(s) in the 10‐H form. These adjusted rates will not go into effect until the approval date by the City of the Supplemental Agreement. CONSULTANT is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. A mistake, inadvertence, or neglect by CONSULTANT in failing to pay the correct rates of prevailing wage will be remedied solely by CONSULTANT and will not, under any circumstances, be considered as the basis of a claim against CITY on this Agreement.

D. Unless specifically stated, the contract shall be a not‐to‐exceed by task, Other Direct Cost (ODC) line item, and total budget as included in the Cost Proposal. Written approval by CITY Project Manager is required for reallocation of budget between tasks, between ODC line items, or between tasks and ODCs. All reallocation requests must include an updated task, budget, and billing summary or revised Cost Proposal. If the reallocation will directly or indirectly require an increase in the total contract amount, it will require a Supplemental Agreement to be approved by the CITY as described in Section F.

E. Written approval by CITY Project Manager is required for any staff substitutions or additions of staff under classifications included in the 10‐H Form(s):
2 Last Updated 7/24/14

1. Updated 10‐H Form(s) for CONSULTANT and/or SUBCONSULTANT shall be included, where applicable.

2. Any addition or substitution shall be paid at the same or lower rate of the previously approved or similar classification.

3. If a substitution involves Key Staff, CONSULTANT shall request and justify the need for substitution and obtain written approval from CITY Project Manager.

The justification shall include a resume of the proposed new Key Staff.

If the staff addition or substitution will include a new classification, any rate increase, or will directly or indirectly require an increase in total contract amount, it will require a Supplemental Agreement to be approved by the CITY as described in Section F.

No work shall commence until agreement is executed. Any work not in compliance with the above, and performed prior to the date of approval by the City, shall not be reimbursed.

F. Supplemental Agreements are required for any changes to the scope and terms of the agreement, including but not limited to the following:

1. Increasing the Agreement not‐to‐exceed amount.
a. Any increase to the not‐to‐exceed amount shall include a cost proposal documenting the increase.

2. Adding task(s) within the advertised scope.

3. Adding new classifications or adjusting rates:
a. Updated 10‐H Form(s) for CONSULTANT and all SUBCONSULTANT shall be included.
b. CONSULTANT may request cost of living increases in base salary of staff after the contract has been in effect for one year. The maximum increase, if approved, shall be the annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) increase as calculated and used by the Social Security Administration. Any approved increase shall not go into effect until a Supplemental Agreement is executed.

4. Adding SUBCONSULTANTS.

5. Adding new Other Direct Cost (ODC) items not included in 10‐H Form.

3 Last Updated 7/24/14

6. Reallocations (between tasks and/or Other Direct Costs)

7. Extending the sunset date of the Agreement.

No work shall commence until the Supplemental Agreement is executed. Any work not in compliance with the above, and performed prior to the date of the execution of the Supplemental Agreement by the City, shall not be reimbursed.

G. Monthly Invoices

1. Invoices shall be made in arrears based on services provided at specific hourly rates and other direct cost(s) incurred per the approved 10‐H Form(s).

2. CONSULTANT AND SUBCONSULTANT invoices shall be submitted using the City‐ template and include the following:
a. Task, Budget, and Billing Summary.
b. A copy of all invoices/receipts for Other Direct Costs and appropriate back up documentation, at rates consistent with the approved 10‐H Form(s).
c. A copy of SUBCONSULTANT invoices using the City template. d. CONSULTANT Project Manager’s signature certifying that all charges have been reviewed and are in compliance with the contract terms. e. If applicable, payroll documentation for staff invoicing under unnamed classifications listed on 10‐H Form.

3. For non‐federally funded projects, CONSULTANT shall meet the 5% Local Business Enterprise (LBE) participation requirement, unless an LBE waiver has been obtained by CITY Project Manager prior to the agreement being executed.

CONSULTANT will track LBE utilization, including for all SUBCONSULTANTs, and include the percentage achieved with each invoice. The 5% requirement only applies to those agreements awarded for a not‐to‐exceed amount over $250,000.

4. For federally funded projects in compliance with 49 CFR 26.37, a Disadvantaged Business Enterprises Utilization Report (Form ADM‐3069) is required, as specified in this Agreement.

5. CONSULTANT may include SUBCONSULTANT costs that are treated by the CONSULTANT as accrued due to such costs having been billed by the SUBCONSULTANT to CONSULTANT and recognized by CONSULTANT and CITY as valid, undisputed, due and payable.

4 Last Updated 7/24/14

6. CONSULTANT shall not add a mark‐up to SUBCONSULTANT for professional services or other direct costs included in the approved 10‐H form(s).

7. Invoices for approved monthly services shall be submitted by CONSULTANT and received by CITY Project Manager within 45 calendar days of the completion of the approved monthly services specified in the Task, Budget, and Billing Summary.

II. COST PRINCIPLES

A. All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files.

B. For federally funded projects, all costs must be in accordance with the cost principles of Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures (48 CFR 31 et seq.).

C. For federally funded projects, CONSULTANT agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments (49 CFR 18).

D. Any costs for which payment had been made to CONSULTANT that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR 31 or 49 CFR 18 are subject to repayment by CONSULTANT to CITY.

III. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
A. CONSULTANT shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with CITY that may have an impact upon the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing CITY construction project. CONSULTANT shall list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing CITY construction project, which will follow.

B. CONSULTANT certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire in the future, any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this contract.

C. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, shall contain all of the provisions of this Article III.
5 Last Updated 7/24/14

D. CONSULTANT certifies that neither CONSULTANT, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT will bid on any construction contract, or on any contract to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this contract.

An affiliated firm is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint‐ownership, or otherwise.

E. Except for SUBCONSULTANTS whose services are limited to providing surveying or materials testing information, no SUBCONSULTANT who has provided design services in connection with this contract shall be eligible to bid on any construction contract, or on any contract to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this contract.

IV. PROVISIONS FOR REBATES, KICKBACKS OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION

CONSULTANT warrants that this contract was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any CITY employee.

In the event of breach or violation of this warranty, CITY shall have the right in its discretion: to terminate the contract without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration.

V. PROHIBITION OF EXPENDING CITY STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING

A. CONSULTANT certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that:

1. No state, federal or CITY appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by‐or‐on behalf of CONSULTANT to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the awarding of any state or federal contract; the making of any state or federal grant; the making of any state or federal loan; the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in 6 Last Updated 7/24/14

connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; CONSULTANT shall complete and submit Standard Form‐LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying”, in accordance with its instructions.

B. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, US. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

C. CONSULTANT also agrees by signing this document that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower‐tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000, and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

VI. AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES

A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by CITY’S Chief Financial Officer.

B. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by CITY’S Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing.

C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by CITY will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this contract.

D. CONSULTANT and SUBCONSULTANTS’ contracts, including cost proposals and indirect cost rates (ICR), are subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, a Contract Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (CPA) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the contract, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers. The contract, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by CITY contract manager to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into 7 Last Updated 7/24/14

the contract by this reference if directed by CITY at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the Federal, State, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

VII. SUBCONSULTING

A. CONSULTANT shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization; and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by CITY’S Contract Administrator, except that, which is expressly identified in the approved Cost Proposal.

B. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this contract to be applicable to SUBCONSULTANTS.

C. Any substitution of SUBCONSULTANTS must be approved in writing by CITY’s Contract Administrator prior to the start of work by the SUBCONSULTANT.

VIII. RETENTION OF RECORDS/AUDIT

A. For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters connected with the performance of the contract pursuant to Government Code 8546.7; CONSULTANT, SUBCONSULTANTS, and CITY shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the contract, including but not limited to, the costs of administering the contract.

All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of final payment under the contract. The state, State Auditor, CITY, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of CONSULTANTS that are pertinent to the contract for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. All subcontracts shall contain this provision.

*All referenced forms and sample templates will be provided by CITY.

10-H FORM INSTRUCTIONS

1. Supplement#: Enter in appropriate Supplement # or fill in Original, if it is to establish the agreement.

2. CONSULTANT Name: Enter CONSULTANT name as it appears on the W‐9, and should match remit information on invoices.

3. Date*: Date CONSULTANT is filling out the 10‐H Form (*This is not the effective date of contract execution for invoicing purposes).

4. Project Name: Enter project name.

5. Project #: Enter CITY project number.

6. The CONSULTANT and SUBCONSULTANT (s) shall submit, for the most recent completed fiscal year, an Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) that has been approved by Caltrans with a Cognizant Letter of Approval if available OR an ICR that is Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) compliant. For contracts $3.5 million or greater, a CPA audited ICR shall be used. a. Fringe Benefit %: Enter in the Fringe Benefit Rate per CONSULTANT ’S audited rate b. Overhead %: Enter in the FAR compliant Overhead Rate.

7. Profit: Enter profit, max is 10%

8. Classification: Enter classification that shall match invoiced classification for payment approval.

9. Name: List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Name. For staff not listed by name, a current payroll document identifying actual hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice for which they bill time. For greater flexibility, besides naming all individuals working on the project, it may be helpful to also enter in a classification without a name (non ‐k
ey staff only), and a rate not to
exceed similar classifications.

10. Key Staff: Denote Key Staff with an X in the Key Staff Column. Final determination of Key Staff to be approved by CITY Project Manager. (Examples of key staff may include a named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer

11. P revailing Wage: Denote staff subject to Prevailing Wage with an X in the Prevailing Wage Column.

12. Overtime: Overtime may be paid to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications).

Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay the CONSULTANT at the approved overtime rates noted within the 10‐H
Form (overtime columns can be unhidden for entry where appropriate).

CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. For more information on applicable prevailing wages, please visit the following website: https://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/PWD/.

13. Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee for Reference Only: Enter in the actual hourly rate of the employee per the date noted in number 3. Actual Base Hourly Rate should not include fringe, in ‐l ieu of fringe, or overhead. Hourly rates for new employees added to the project, after the execution of original 10‐H shall not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this 10‐H
Form.

14. Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate for Reference Only: Rate is for reference purposes during negotiations. This field is auto‐ calculated.
[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A A x Profit % = B
A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

15. Approved Flat Hourly Billing Rate: Approved Flat Hourly Billing Rate shall generally equal the Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate except where Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate exceeds reasonable market costs for such work as determined by CITY. The Approved Flat Hourly Billing Rate may differ from the Actual Fully Loaded Rate if CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for select employees. The Approved Flat Hourly Billing Rate shall be all‐inclusive, including all mark‐ups, fringe, overhead and profit.

16. Other Direct Costs (ODC's): Enter in a description of the ODC's to be reimbursed. No mark‐up shall be applied to ODC's.

See Guidelines below.

GUIDELINES – OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Other Direct Costs (ODCs) may only include those items not covered in indirect costs and must list specific items at cost. All ODCs need to be itemized in the 10‐H
form and be compliant with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Receipts or other appropriate documentation must be provided for reimbursement of ODC items and no mark‐u p is permitted.

Ineligible ODCs
Use of in house equipment (e.g., computers, phones, printers), office supplies, copies, and other items generally associated with doing business should not be included in ODCs. Food items and travel to and from the employees’ home to the office are not allowable ODCs.

Travel
Mileage from an employee’s home to the office is not reimbursable. Mileage from the office to the work site or off‐site meetings may be allowable if approved by the City’s Project Manager and only if the consultant is traveling from out of the area.

If required for the project, all hotel costs and air fare must be within Caltrans rate (i.e., at lowest available airfare, reasonable hotel rate for area). All travel must be pre‐a
pproved by the City’s Project Manager.

Estimating ODCs
Any ODCs need to be itemized with a not‐to exceed total for each item. If an ODC item is not listed, it will not be reimbursable under the contract. Please consider the total costs for each individual item to determine if it warrants individual tracking and invoicing or whether it should more efficiently be absorbed within overhead costs.

Potential ODCs. (These are examples only; they may not be appropriate in each individual case):

Description Rate
Printing/Reproduction (outside vendor only) At Cost
Permits/Fees At Cost
Lab Analyses/Test (list specifics) Per Test
Cost
Equipment (list specifics) At cost/
lease rate
Field Equipment/Supplies (outside vendor)*** At cost
Shipping/Postage At cost

*
Units: Include if here is a relevant per‐u
nit cost (e.g., $40 per traffic count location)

BENNETT ESA
FEHR &

PEERS GEOCON
MARK
THOMAS MIG UNICO Total Cost
Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 Meetings & Field Review $ 31,603.15 $ 8,777.17 $ 9,690.49 $ 9,311.34 $ 6,767.80 $ 66,149.95

1.2 Project Schedule $ 7,687.56 $ 9,274.05 $ 646.51 $ 17,608.12

1.3 Project budget, Invoicing, Status reports $ 7,687.56 $ 5,032.94 $ 12,720.50

1.4 Agency Coordination $ 32,030.50 $ 362.40 $ 32,392.90

1.5 Quality Control Plan $ 26,942.91 $ 2,676.39 $ 29,619.30

1.0 Subtotal $ 105,951.69 $ 8,777.17 $ 18,964.54 $ 9,311.34 $ - $ 15,486.04 $ - $ 158,490.78 Task 2.0 Data Collection, Mapping, and Surveys

2.1 Topographic Survey and Base Mapping $ 3,133.48 $ 34,181.71 $ 37,315.19

2.0 Subtotal $ 3,133.48 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 34,181.71 $ 37,315.19 Task 3.0 Geotechnical Engineering

3.1 Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) Survey $ 1,067.68 $ 9,249.34 $ 10,317.02

3.2 Geotechnical Pavement Evaluation $ 1,494.74 $ 9,311.34 $ 10,806.08

3.3 Enhanced Pavement Patching $ - $ -

3.0 Subtotal $ 2,562.42 $ - $ - $ 18,560.68 $ - $ - $ - $ 21,123.10 Task 4.0 Right-of-Way

4.1 Waiver Valuations $ - $ -

4.2 Acquisition and Negotiation $ - $ -

4.3 Plats and Legal Descriptions for Right-of-Way Support $ - $ -

4.4 Property Owner Exhibits $ - $ -

4.0 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 5.0 Utility Data Collection

5.1 Utility Conflict Mapping $ 30,812.87 $ 30,812.87

5.2 Subsurface Utility Engineering and Potholing $ - $ 6,665.57 $ 6,665.57

5.3 Potholing Survey $ - $ 4,783.38 $ 4,783.38

5.4 Utility Coordination $ 51,791.45 $ 51,791.45

5.0 Subtotal $ 82,604.33 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,665.57 $ - $ 4,783.38 $ 94,053.28 Task 6.0 CEQA/NEPA Revalidation

6.1 Review of Documentation and Revalidation Scoping $ 2,989.47 $ 6,082.30 $ 9,071.77

6.2 Investigations and Documentation $ 2,989.47 $ 26,019.82 $ 29,009.29

6.0 Subtotal $ 5,978.95 $ 32,102.12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 38,081.07 Task 7.0 Public and Stakeholder Outreach

7.1 Building Awareness $ 4,270.73 $ 14,582.77 $ 18,853.50

7.2 Engaging the Community $ 16,228.63 $ 11,324.12 $ 27,552.75

7.3 Connecting with Businesses $ 27,759.97 $ 10,465.97 $ 38,225.94

7.0 Subtotal $ 48,259.33 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 36,372.86 $ - $ 84,632.19 Task 8.0 PS&E Development

8.1 Basis of Design Memorandum $ 11,109.88 $ 11,109.88

8.2 Concept Refinement and 30% Plans $ 61,426.43 $ 24,873.12 $ 13,692.96 $ 99,992.51

8.3 Driveway Variance Memorandum $ 12,531.49 $ 12,531.49

8.4 Project Report Update $ 9,966.53 $ 9,966.53

8.5 Drainage Report $ 28,051.34 $ 28,051.34

8.6 Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSDCR) $ 2,348.84 $ 28,582.75 $ 30,931.59

8.7 60% Plans and Estimate $ 124,911.20 $ 23,441.09 $ 1,649.56 $ 19,337.17 $ 169,339.02

8.8 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) $ 98,417.06 $ 18,497.42 $ 24,082.63 $ 140,997.11

8.9 Plan and Constructability Review $ - $ 39,690.47 $ 39,690.47

8.10 100% PS&E $ 81,094.72 $ 13,086.36 $ 15,421.27 $ 109,602.35

8.11 LAPM Forms $ 17,936.84 $ 17,936.84

8.12 ATP Counts $ 11,949.37 $ 11,949.37

8.0 Subtotal $ 459,743.71 $ - $108,480.74 $ 1,649.56 $ 39,690.47 $ 72,534.03 $ - $ 682,098.51 Task 9 Grant Application Support

9.1 Grant Application Support $ 10,764.92 $ 3,113.70 $ 13,878.62

9.0 Subtotal $ 10,764.92 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,113.70 $ - $ 13,878.62 Task 10 Bidding Assistance

10.1 Pre-Bid Meeting $ 2,989.47 $ 362.40 $ 3,351.87

10.2 Bidder Inquiries $ 11,067.96 $ 1,649.56 $ 731.80 $ 13,449.32

10.3 Preparation of Addenda $ 10,563.98 $ 1,642.14 $ 12,206.12

10.0 Subtotal $ 24,621.42 $ - $ - $ 1,649.56 $ - $ 2,736.34 $ - $ 29,007.32 Task 11.0 Permitting

11.1 Permitting Support $ 8,754.74 $ 8,754.74

11.0 Subtotal $ 8,754.74 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,754.74 Task 12.0 Construction Support

12.1 Pre-Construction Meeting $ - $ -

12.2 Construction Engineering Assistance $ - $ 3,162.69 $ 3,162.69

12.3 Prepare As-Built Drawings $ - $ -

12.0 Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ 3,162.69 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,162.69 Project Total $ 752,374.99 $ 40,879.29 $127,445.28 $ 34,333.83 $ 46,356.04 $130,242.97 $ 38,965.09 $ 1,170,597.49 Other Direct Costs
Outside Reproduction $ 1,000.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,200.00 Potholing $ 140,000.00 $ 140,000.00
Record Searches $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00
Geotechnical $ 9,425.00 $ 9,425.00
Appraisals $ -
Mileage $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 ODC Subtotal $ 141,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 9,425.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ - $ 155,225.00 Grand Total $ 893,374.99 $ 42,479.29 $127,445.28 $ 43,758.83 $ 47,356.04 $132,442.97 $ 38,965.09 $ 1,325,822.49

OVERALL COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Staff Name
and or
Classification
Leo Rubio
Engineer 10
Carlton Allen
Engineer 8 Engineer 10 Engineer 9 Engineer 8 Engineer 7 Engineer 6 Engineer 5 Engineer 4 Engineer 3 Engineer 2 Engineer 1 Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
130.65%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 126.25 $ 84.16 $ 113.17 $ 95.78 $ 85.54 $ 77.60 $ 66.91 $ 56.15 $ 51.44 $ 44.01 $ 39.94 $ 35.49 Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 Meetings & Field Review Hours 48 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 $ 12,456.16 $ 16,273.97 $ 2,873.01 $ 31,603.15

1.2 Project Schedule Hours 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 3,030.00 $ 3,958.70 $ 698.87 $ 7,687.56

1.3 Project budget, Invoicing, Status reports Hours 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 3,030.00 $ 3,958.70 $ 698.87 $ 7,687.56

1.4 Agency Coordination Hours 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 $ 12,624.60 $ 16,494.04 $ 2,911.86 $ 32,030.50

1.5 Quality Control Plan Hours 16 16 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 $ 10,619.36 $ 13,874.19 $ 2,449.36 $ 26,942.91

1.0 Subtotal 172 152 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 404 41,760.12 54,559.60 9,631.97 $ 105,951.69 Task 2.0 Data Collection, Mapping, and Surveys

2.1 Topographic Survey and Base Mapping Hours 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 20 $ 1,235.04 $ 1,613.58 $ 284.86 $ 3,133.48

2.0 Subtotal 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 20 $ 1,235.04 $ 1,613.58 $ 284.86 $ 3,133.48 Task 3.0 Geotechnical Engineering

3.1 Aerially Deposited Lead (ADL) Survey Hours 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 $ 420.82 $ 549.80 $ 97.06 $ 1,067.68

3.2 Geotechnical Pavement Evaluation Hours 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 $ 589.14 $ 769.71 $ 135.89 $ 1,494.74

3.3 Enhanced Pavement Patching Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

3.0 Subtotal 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1,009.96 1,319.51 232.95 $ 2,562.42 Task 4.0 Right-of-Way

4.1 Waiver Valuations Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 Acquisition and Negotiation Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.3 Plats and Legal Descriptions for Right-of-Way Support Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.4 Property Owner Exhibits Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - $ - Task 5.0 Utility Data Collection

5.1 Utility Conflict Mapping Hours 4 18 0 0 0 0 0 60 80 60 0 0 222 $ 12,144.68 $ 15,867.02 $ 2,801.17 $ 30,812.87

5.2 Subsurface Utility Engineering and Potholing Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.3 Potholing Survey Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.4 Utility Coordination Hours 40 40 0 0 0 56 64 60 0 0 0 0 260 $ 20,413.24 $ 26,669.90 $ 4,708.31 $ 51,791.45

5.0 Subtotal 44 58 0 0 0 56 64 120 80 60 0 0 482 $ 32,557.92 $ 42,536.92 $ 7,509.48 $ 82,604.33 Task 6.0 CEQA/NEPA Revalidation

6.1 Review of Documentation and Revalidation Scoping Hours 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 $ 1,178.28 $ 1,539.42 $ 271.77 $ 2,989.47

6.2 Investigations and Documentation Hours 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 $ 1,178.28 $ 1,539.42 $ 271.77 $ 2,989.47

6.0 Subtotal 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 2,356.56 $ 3,078.85 $ 543.54 $ 5,978.95 Task 7.0 Public and Stakeholder Outreach

7.1 Building Awareness Hours 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 $ 1,683.28 $ 2,199.21 $ 388.25 $ 4,270.73

7.2 Engaging the Community Hours 24 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 $ 6,396.40 $ 8,356.90 $ 1,475.33 $ 16,228.63

7.3 Connecting with Businesses Hours 60 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 $ 10,941.40 $ 14,294.94 $ 2,523.63 $ 27,759.97

7.0 Subtotal 92 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 $ 19,021.08 $ 24,851.04 $ 4,387.21 $ 48,259.33 City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Bennett Engineering Services

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Task 8.0 PS&E Development

8.1 Basis of Design Memorandum Hours 4 8 0 0 0 24 20 0 0 0 0 0 56 $ 4,378.88 $ 5,721.01 $ 1,009.99 $ 11,109.88

8.2 Concept Refinement and 30% Plans Hours 16 40 0 0 0 40 80 80 80 40 0 0 376 $ 24,210.80 $ 31,631.41 $ 5,584.22 $ 61,426.43

8.3 Driveway Variance Memorandum Hours 8 20 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 68 $ 4,939.20 $ 6,453.06 $ 1,139.23 $ 12,531.49

8.4 Project Report Update Hours 8 24 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 48 $ 3,928.24 $ 5,132.25 $ 906.05 $ 9,966.53

8.5 Drainage Report Hours 8 24 0 0 0 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 152 $ 11,056.24 $ 14,444.98 $ 2,550.12 $ 28,051.34

8.6 Traffic Signal Design Concept Report (TSDCR) Hours 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 $ 925.78 $ 1,209.53 $ 213.53 $ 2,348.84

8.7 60% Plans and Estimate Hours 24 48 0 0 0 0 160 160 300 160 0 0 852 $ 49,232.88 $ 64,322.76 $ 11,355.56 $ 124,911.20

8.8 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Hours 24 40 0 0 0 0 120 120 240 120 0 0 664 $ 38,790.40 $ 50,679.66 $ 8,947.01 $ 98,417.06

8.9 Plan and Constructability Review Hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

8.10 100% PS&E Hours 24 32 0 0 0 0 80 100 160 160 0 0 556 $ 31,962.92 $ 41,759.55 $ 7,372.25 $ 81,094.72

8.11 LAPM Forms Hours 24 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 $ 7,069.68 $ 9,236.54 $ 1,630.62 $ 17,936.84

8.12 ATP Counts Hours 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 0 64 $ 4,709.76 $ 6,153.30 $ 1,086.31 $ 11,949.37

8.0 Subtotal 158 308 0 0 0 104 500 556 780 496 16 0 2918 $ 181,204.78 $ 236,744.05 $ 41,794.88 $ 459,743.71 Task 9 Grant Application Support $ -

9.1 Grant Application Support Hours 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 76 $ 4,242.92 $ 5,543.37 $ 978.63 $ 10,764.92

9.0 Subtotal 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 0 76 $ 4,242.92 $ 5,543.37 $ 978.63 $ 10,764.92 Task 10 Bidding Assistance

10.1 Pre-Bid Meeting Hours 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 $ 1,178.28 $ 1,539.42 $ 271.77 $ 2,989.47

10.2 Bidder Inquiries Hours 4 12 0 0 0 16 24 0 0 0 0 0 56 $ 4,362.36 $ 5,699.42 $ 1,006.18 $ 11,067.96

10.3 Preparation of Addenda Hours 4 16 0 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 52 $ 4,163.72 $ 5,439.90 $ 960.36 $ 10,563.98

10.0 Subtotal 12 36 0 0 0 32 40 0 0 0 0 0 120 $ 9,704.36 $ 12,678.75 $ 2,238.31 $ 24,621.42 Task 11.0 Permitting $ -

11.1 Permitting Support Hours 6 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 $ 3,450.62 $ 4,508.24 $ 795.89 $ 8,754.74

11.0 Subtotal 6 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 $ 3,450.62 $ 4,508.24 $ 795.89 $ 8,754.74 Task 12.0 Construction Support $ -

12.1 Pre-Construction Meeting Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

12.2 Construction Engineering Assistance Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

12.3 Prepare As-Built Drawings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

12.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Project Total Hours 500 708 0 40 40 192 604 708 876 572 32 0 4272 $ 296,543.36 $ 387,433.90 $ 68,397.73 $ 752,374.99 Other Direct Costs
Outside Reproduction $ 1,000.00
Potholing $ 140,000.00
ODC Subtotal $ 141,000.00
Grand Total $ 893,374.99
Staff Name
and or
Classification
M. Logue
Principal
Consultant
4 Associate
Consultant 3
Principal
Consultant 2
Senior
Consultant 2 Consultant 4
Principal
Consultant 3
Senior
Consultant 3
Associate
Consultant 4
Project
Technician
4 Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
201.19%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 89.72 $ 37.96 $ 76.08 $ 43.42 $ 34.58 $ 76.93 $ 55.29 $ 46.67 $ 48.23 Task 5.0 CEQA/NEPA Revalidation $ -

5.1 Review of Documentation and
Reval Scoping Hours 12 20 32 $ 1,835.84 $ 3,693.53 $ 552.94 $ 6,082.30

5.2 Investigations and Documentation Hours 16 40 2 8 8 20 40 8 142 $ 7,853.64 $ 15,800.74 $ 2,365.44 $ 26,019.82

5.3 Project Mangagement and
Meetings Hours 18 12 12 42 $ 2,649.24 $ 5,330.01 $ 797.92 $ 8,777.17 Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours
Hours 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

5.0 Subtotal 46 72 2 8 8 20 40 8 12 216 $ 12,338.72 $ 24,824.27 $ 3,716.30 $ 40,879.29 Total 46 72 2 8 8 20 40 8 12 216 $ 12,338.72 $ 24,824.27 $ 3,716.30 $ 40,879.29 Other Direct Costs
Outside Reproduction $ -
Records Searches $ 1,600.00
ODC Subtotal $ 1,600.00
Grand Total $ 42,479.29
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 ESA

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Staff Name and
or Classification
Kristin
Calia
Principal-in-
Charge
Adrian Engel
Project
Manager
Principal
Danny
Murphy
Senior
Associate
Jose Garcia
Engineer
Brian Situ
Engineer
JoLynn Souto
Senior Project
Coordinator
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
181.39%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 89.42 $ 87.98 $ 73.08 $ 42.31 $ 42.31 $ 50.96 Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 Project Management Hours 24 20 44 $ 3,130.72 $ 5,678.81 $ 880.95 $ 9,690.49

1.2 Meetings and Coordination Hours 24 4 2 12 42 $ 2,996.18 $ 5,434.77 $ 843.10 $ 9,274.05 Task 1.0 Subtotal 0 48 4 2 12 20 86 6,126.90 11,113.58 1,724.05 18,964.53 Task 2.0 Preliminary Engineering

2.1 30% Plans Hours 2 4 8 40 40 3 97 $ 4,653.08 $ 8,440.22 $ 1,309.33 $ 14,402.63

2.2 30% Plans Peer Review Hours 24 16 2 42 $ 3,382.72 $ 6,135.92 $ 951.86 $ 10,470.50

2.3 Traffic Signal Design Concept
Report (TSDCR) Hours 8 20 16 40 80 10 174 $ 9,231.04 $ 16,744.18 $ 2,597.52 $ 28,572.75 Task 2.0 Subtotal 10 48 40 80 120 15 313 $ 17,266.84 $ 31,320.32 $ 4,858.72 $ 53,445.88 Task 3.0 Plan, Specifications, and
Estimate (PS&E)

3.1 60% Plans Hours 6 8 12 40 40 8 114 $ 5,909.80 $ 10,719.79 $ 1,662.96 $ 18,292.54

3.2 90% Plans Hours 4 4 12 32 24 7 83 $ 4,312.64 $ 7,822.70 $ 1,213.53 $ 13,348.87

3.3 100% Plans Hours 4 4 8 12 12 5 45 $ 2,564.48 $ 4,651.71 $ 721.62 $ 7,937.81

3.4 60%, 90%, and 100% Estimates Hours 4 4 16 16 2 42 $ 2,165.44 $ 3,927.89 $ 609.33 $ 6,702.66

3.5 90% and 100% Specifications Hours 16 2 4 8 14 44 $ 2,827.84 $ 5,129.42 $ 795.73 $ 8,752.98 Task 3.0 Subtotal 34 22 32 104 100 36 328 $ 17,780.20 $ 32,251.50 $ 5,003.17 $ 55,034.88 Task 4.0 Bidding and Construction
Assistance

4.1 Construction Assistance Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

4.2 As-Built Drawings Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Task 4.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Other Direct Costs
ODC Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Grand Total 44 118 76 186 232 71 727 41173.94 74685.41 11585.93 $ 127,445.28 Franklin Boulevard Complete Street - Phase 3
Fehr & Peers
Staff Name
and or
Classification
Principal
Eng / Geol
/ Sci
Senior Eng /
Geol / Sci
Project Eng /
Geol / Sci
Senior Staff
Eng / Geol /
Sci
Staff Eng /
Geol / Sci
GIS
Specialist
Word
Processing /
Admin
Field
Technician
(PW)
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
181.88%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 75.00 $ 65.00 $ 60.00 $ 45.00 $ 35.00 $ 52.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 Meetings & Field Review Hours 1 4 16 8 2 4 2 20 57 $ 3,003.00 $ 5,461.86 $ 846.49 $ 9,311.34

1.0 Subtotal 1 4 16 8 2 4 2 20 57 3,003.00 5,461.86 846.49 9,311.34 Task 2.0 Data Collection, Mapping,
and Surveys $ -
Geotechnical Pavement Evaluation Hours 1 4 16 8 2 4 2 20 57 $ 3,003.00 $ 5,461.86 $ 846.49 $ 9,311.34

2.0 Subtotal 1 4 16 8 2 4 2 20 57 $ 3,003.00 $ 5,461.86 $ 846.49 $ 9,311.34 Task 5.0 CEQA/NEPA Revalidation $ -
ADL Survey Hours 1 6 24 4 2 16 53 $ 2,983.00 $ 5,425.48 $ 840.85 $ 9,249.33

5.0 Subtotal 1 6 24 0 0 4 2 16 53 $ 2,983.00 $ 5,425.48 $ 840.85 $ 9,249.33 Task 7.0 PS&E Development $ -

7.1 60% Plans & Estimate Hours 1 2 4 1 1 9 $ 532.00 $ 967.60 $ 149.96 $ 1,649.56

7.0 Subtotal 1 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 9 $ 532.00 $ 967.60 $ 149.96 $ 1,649.56 Task 11.0 Bidding Assistance $ -
Bidding Assistance Hours 1 2 4 1 1 9 $ 532.00 $ 967.60 $ 149.96 $ 1,649.56

11.0 Subtotal 1 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 9 $ 532.00 $ 967.60 $ 149.96 $ 1,649.56 Task 12.0 Construction Support $ -
Construction Support Hours 1 4 10 1 1 17 $ 1,020.00 $ 1,855.18 $ 287.52 $ 3,162.69

12.0 Subtotal 1 4 10 0 0 0 1 0 17 $ 1,020.00 $ 1,855.18 $ 287.52 $ 3,162.69 Total 6 22 74 16 4 14 9 56 193 $ 11,073.00 $ 20,139.57 $ 3,121.26 $ 34,333.83 Other Direct Costs
Traffic Control Statewide $ 3,850.00
Pick-Up Truck $ 450.00
Coring Equipment $ 250.00
Generator $ 150.00
Core Patch Material $ 100.00
Lab R-Value $ 640.00
Lab - Atterberg Limits $ 420.00
Lab - #200 Wash $ 180.00
Lab - Grain Size Analysis $ 375.00
Lab - Moisture Content $ 100.00
Lab Compaction Curve $ 250.00
Hand Auger $ 50. 00
Level D PPE $ 50. 00
GPS Unit $ 160.00
Single Metal $ 1,440.00
STLC or TCLP Extraction $ 960.00
ODC Subtotal $ 9,425.00
Grand Total $ 43,758.83
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Geocon Consultants, Inc.

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
1 Sr. Project
Manager
(Silva)
Project
Engineer
Design
Engineer II
CM Divison
Manager
(Lilly)
SUE
Program
Manager
(Rojas)
Bldg/CI
Inspector
Grp 4
Survey
Specialist II
Project
Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
146.58%
Profit
10% Total Cost
$ 101.94 $ 61.30 $ 54.60 $ 139.83 $ 84.14 $ 45.59 $ 56.86 $ 49.35 $ 54.77 Task 2.0 Data Collection, Mapping,
and Surveys $ -
Subsurface Utility Engineering 2 6 $ 16.00 $ 16.00 2 42 $ 2,457.46 $ 3,602.14 $ 605.96 $ 6,665.57

2.0 Subtotal 2 0 0 0 6 16 16 0 2 42 $ 2,457.46 $ 3,602.14 $ 605.96 $ 6,665.57 Task 7.0 PS&E Development $ -
Plan and Constructability Review 16 40 34 8 80 6 10 194 $ 14,633.08 $ 21,449.17 $ 3,608.22 $ 39,690.47

7.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 194 $ 14,633.08 $ 21,449.17 $ 3,608.22 $ 39,690.47 Total 2 0 0 0 6 16 16 0 2 42 $ 17,090.54 $ 25,051.31 $ 4,214.19 $ 46,356.04 Other Direct Costs
Mileage $ 1,000.00
ODC Subtotal $ 1,000.00
Grand Total $ 47,356.04
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Staff Name
and or
Classification
Melissa Erikson
Principal
Landscape
Architect
Jose Leal
Sr. Project
Manager
Karthik Kumar
Sr. Complete
Streets Specialist
Noe Noyola
Sr. Community
Engagement
Specialist
Jennifer Zell
Sr. Landscape
Architect
Bahar Mojtahedi
Sr. Project
Associate
Itzel Pena
Community
Engagement
Associate
Project
Administration
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
163.56%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $ 76.93 $ 62.50 $ 63.71 $ 49.00 $ 63.50 $ 39.25 $ 32.00 $ 46.00 Task 1.0 Project Management

1.1 Meetings & Field Review Hours 4 18 8 8 38 $ 2,334.40 $ 3,818.14 $ 615.25 $ 6,767.80

1.2 Project Schedule Hours 2 2 4 $ 223.00 $ 364.74 $ 58.77 $ 646.51

1.3 Project budget, Invoicing, Status
reports Hours 16 16 32 $ 1,736.00 $ 2,839.40 $ 457.54 $ 5,032.94

1.4 Agency Coordination Hours 2 2 $ 125.00 $ 204.45 $ 32.95 $ 362.40

1.5 Quality Control Plan Hours 12 12 $ 923.16 $ 1,509.92 $ 243.31 $ 2,676.39

1.0 Subtotal 16 38 8 10 0 0 0 16 88 5,341.56 8,736.66 1,407.82 15,486.04 Task 3.0 Public Outreach &
Stakeholder Outreach

3.1 Building Awareness Hours 12 28 48 32 120 $ 5,030.00 $ 8,227.07 $ 1,325.71 $ 14,582.77

3.2 Engaging the Community Hours 16 32 8 32 88 $ 3,906.00 $ 6,388.65 $ 1,029.47 $ 11,324.12

3.3 Connecting with Businesses Hours 32 16 8 16 72 $ 3,610.00 $ 5,904.52 $ 951.45 $ 10,465.97

3.0 Subtotal 0 60 76 0 64 80 0 280 12,546.00 20,520.24 3,306.62 36,372.86 Task 4.0 Preliminary Engineering

4.1 30% Design Plans Hours 4 12 16 12 48 92 $ 4,723.08 $ 7,725.07 $ 1,244.81 $ 13,692.96

4.0 Subtotal 4 12 16 0 12 48 0 0 92 4,723.08 7,725.07 1,244.81 13,692.96 Task 7.0 PS&E Development $ -

7.1 60% Plans & Estimate Hours 4 24 20 12 72 132 $ 6,669.92 $ 10,909.32 $ 1,757.92 $ 19,337.17

7.2 90% PS&E Hours 4 32 24 16 88 164 $ 8,306.76 $ 13,586.54 $ 2,189.33 $ 24,082.63

7.3 100% PS&E Hours 2 24 16 12 48 102 $ 5,319.22 $ 8,700.12 $ 1,401.93 $ 15,421.27

7.0 Subtotal 2 24 16 0 12 48 0 0 398 $ 20,295.90 $ 33,195.97 $ 5,349.19 $ 58,841.06 Task 9.0 Grant Application Support $ -

9.1 Grant Assistance Hours 4 4 16 24 $ 1,074.00 $ 1,756.63 $ 283.06 $ 3,113.70

9.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 $ 1,074.00 $ 1,756.63 $ 283.06 $ 3,113.70 Task 11.0 Bidding Assistance $ - Pre-Bid Meeting Hours 2 2 $ 125.00 $ 204.45 $ 32.95 $ 362.40 Bidder Inquiries Hours 2 2 4 $ 252.42 $ 412.86 $ 66.53 $ 731.81 Preparation of Addenda Hours 2 2 8 12 $ 566.42 $ 926.44 $ 149.29 $ 1,642.14

11.0 Subtotal 0 2 2 0 0 8 0 0 18 $ 943.84 $ 1,543.74 $ 248.76 $ 2,736.34 Total 20 110 24 86 12 112 80 16 478 $ 44,924.38 $ 73,478.32 $ 11,840.27 $ 130,242.98 Other Direct Costs
Outside Reproduction $ 1,200.00
Mileage $ 1,000.00
ODC Subtotal $ 2,200.00
Grand Total $ 132,442.98
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 MIG, Inc.

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
1 Staff Name
and or
Classification
Rob
Markes
Survey
Manager
Richard
Maddock,
PLS
Senior Land
Surveyor
Ryan Ming,
PLS
Senior Land
Surveyor
Adam
Bishop, PLS
Senior Land
Surveyor
Todd Jordan,
PLS
Land
Surveyor
Roy Porter,
LSIT
Land
Surveyor
Terrance
Ranney
Drone
Manager
Staff
Party Chief
Staff
Rodman
Staff
Survey
Technician/
Drafter
Hours
Subtotal Labor Costs
OH + Fringe
149.95%
Profit
10% Total Cost
Actual Base
Hourly Rate $88.00 $74.52 $70.35 $66.25 $53.00 $40.50 $55.00 $85.47 $78.00 $32.00 Task 2.0 Data Collection, Mapping,
and Surveys $ -
Item 1 - Topographic Surveying and
Base Mapping Hours 8 60 60 60 188 $ 12,432.20 $ 18,642.08 $ 3,107.43 $ 34,181.71 Item 2 Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

2.0 Subtotal 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 188 $ 12,432.20 $ 18,642.08 $ 3,107.43 $ 34,181.71 Task 8.0 Utility and Right of Way
Coordination Support $ -
Item 1 - Pot-Holing Support Hours 2 8 8 8 26 $ 1,739.76 $ 2,608.77 $ 434.85 $ 4,783.38 Item 2 - Right of Way Support Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - Hours 0 $ - $ - $ - $ -

8.0 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 $ 1,739.76 $ 2,608.77 $ 434.85 $ 4,783.38 Total 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 188 $ 14,171.96 $ 21,250.85 $ 3,542.28 $ 38,965.10 Other Direct Costs
Outside Reproduction $ -
Potholing (Optional) $ -
ODC Subtotal $ -
Grand Total $ 38,965.09
City of Sacramento - Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3 UNICO Engineering

COST PROPOSAL - COST PLUS FIXED FEE
1 Check one: Prime
Prime CONSULTANT Name: Bennett Engineering Services Date:

X Sub Project Name:
2nd Tier Sub Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % Combined %

47.39% 83.26% 0.00% 130.65%
Fixed Fee (Profit) %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
a
ny Fringe, OH, or
G&A)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH, G&A & Fixed
Fee)
X Engineer 10 Leo Rubio $126.25 $320.32
X Engineer 8 Carlton Allen $84.16 $213.53
Engineer 10 Staff - TBD $113.17 $287.13
Engineer 9 Staff - TBD $95.78 $243.01
Engineer 8 Staff - TBD $85.54 $217.03
Engineer 7 Staff - TBD $77.60 $196.88
Engineer 6 Staff - TBD $66.91 $169.76
Engineer 5 Staff - TBD $56.15 $142.46
Engineer 4 Staff - TBD $51.44 $130.51
Engineer 3 Staff - TBD $44.01 $111.66
Engineer 2 Staff - TBD $39.94 $101.33
Engineer 1 Staff - TBD $35.49 $90.04

TOTAL BUDGET AMOUNTS
42,479.29$

127,445.28$

43,758.83$

47,356.04$

132,442.97$

38,965.09$

432,447.50$

Description Rate Total
Outside Reproduction At Cost 1,000.00$
Potholing!(Bess Testlab) 140,
000.00 140,000.00$
TOTAL 141,000.00$
GRAND TOTAL: 1,325,822.49$
By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

Leo Rubio, PE, President

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approv ed flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. K
ey Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Not e K
ey staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. T
he employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date not ed abov
e. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require writt en appr
oval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify t he need f
or the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. A
pproved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is bas ed on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. O
vertime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be char ged unl
ess prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Loc
al transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. T
he Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburs e C
ONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. O
DC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.Other Direct Costs
(ODC) Items
and Rates

Original
12/17/2024
Estimated
ODC
Budgets
Shall Be
+ Gen & Admin %

SUB CONSULTANTS

SUB CONSULTANT NAME
ESA
Fehr & Peers
Geocon
Mark Thomas
MIG
Unico
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3
T15165503 / Bid #P25151111004
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):

COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Version: JANUARY 4, 2022
Page1 of 4
Check one: Sub
Prime CONSULTANT Name: ESA Date:

X Sub Project Name:
2nd Tier Sub Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % Combined %

50.19% 0.00% 151.00% 201.19%
Fixed Fee (Profit) %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe, OH, or
G&A)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH, G&A & Fixed
Fee)
X Principal Consultant 4 Melissa Logue $89.72 $297.25
Associate Consultant 3 $37.96 $125.76
Principal Consultant 2 $76.08 # $252.06
Senior Consultant 2 $43.42 $143.85
Consultant 4 $34.58 $114.57
Principal Consultant 3 $76.93 $254.88
Senior Consultant 3 $55.29 $183.18
Associate Consultant 4 $46.67 $154.62
Project Technician 4 $48.23 $159.79
$0.00

TOTAL BUDGET AMOUNTS
-$
-$
Description Rate Total
Records Search at- cost (est. $800 each) 1,600.00$
-$
GRAND TOTAL: 42,479.29$
CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM
Franklin Boulevard Complete Street Phase 3
T15165503 / Bid #P25151111004
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):

COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Original
4/30/2025
Estimate
d ODC
Budgets
Shall Be
+ Gen & Admin %
SUB
CONSU
LTANTS

SUB CONSULTANT NAME
By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.

Melissa Logue, Transportation Director, NorCal

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.

2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.

3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above.

Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original.

4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.

5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.

6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines.

7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.

8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.

9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. Other Direct
Costs
(ODC)

Version: JANUARY 4, 2022
Page1 of 1
Check one: Sub
Prime CONSULTANT Name: Fehr & Peers Date:

X Sub Project Name:
2nd Tier Sub Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % Combined %

60.07% 121.32% 0.00% 181.39%
Fixed Fee (Profit) %: 10.00%
Key Staff
Prevailing
Wage Classification Name
Actual Base Hourly
Rate Paid to
Employee For
Reference Only
(Does not Include
any Fringe, OH, or
G&A)
Actual Fully
Loaded Hourly
Rate For
Reference Only
(Includes Fringe,
OH, G&A & Fixed
Fee)
Principal Kristin Calia $89.42 $276.78
X Principal Adrian Engel $87.98 $272.32
Principal Greg Behrens $81.73 # $252.98
Senior Associate Dave Stanek $87.98 $272.32
Senior Associate Danny Murphy $73.08 $226.20
Senior Engineer/Planner David Manciati $57.69 $178.57
Senior Engineer/Planner Yoyo Zeng $57.69 $178.57
Senior Engineer/Planner Sonia Anthoine $49.76 $154.02
Associate Carly Hoyt $80.00 $247.62
Senior Associate Kari McNickle $70.67 $218.74
Engineer/Planner Raina Joby $39.42 $122.02
Engineer/Planner Jonathan Murillo $39.42 $122.02
Engineer/Planner Pa Nhia Yang $36.06 $111.62
Engineer/Planner Evan Mori $37.02 $114.59
Engineer/Planner Daoud Farah $33.65 $104.16
Engineer/Planner Sree Gudimella $39.42 $122.02
Engineer/Planner Jacob Igawa $38.46 $119.04
Engineer/Planner Brian Situ $42.31 $130.96
Engineer/Planner Mary Ramones $43.75 $135.42
Engineer/Planner Jose Garcia $42.31 $130.96
Senior Engineering Technician William Edmondson $58.17 $180.05 Technician Tim Wilbur $34.62 $107.16
Technician Marty Delgado $34.62 $107.16
Intern Yihao Zhang $29.00 $89.76
Senior Project Coordinator JoLynn Souto $50.96 $157.74
Senior Project Coordinator Lacy Delgado $38.46 $119.04
Senior Project Accountant Laura Murphy $37.02 $114.59
Senior Project Accountant Kayleigh Pastorius $57.69 $178.57 Project Coordinator Gizelle Halvorson $29.81 $92.27
$0.00
Description Rate Total
-$
-$
-$
TOTAL -$
GRAND TOTAL: 127,445.28$
[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORM

COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original): Original 9/23/2024
Franklin Blvd Complete Street Phase 3
T15165503
+ Gen & Admin %
A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Other Direct
Costs (ODC)
Items and Rates
Estimated ODC
Budgets Shall Be
Included in Cost
Proposal.
1 Check one: Sub
Prime CONSULTANT Name: Fehr & Peers Date:

X Sub Project Name:
2nd Tier Sub Project #:

Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead % Combined %

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE
Adrian Engel