City of Sacramento
Law and Legislation Committee Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2025-00657 10/14/2025
Legislative Advocacy Correspondence
File ID: 2025-00657
Location: Citywide
Recommendation: Receive and file.
Contact: Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, (916) 808-7395, [email protected], Office of the City Manager Presenter: None.
Attachments:
1-Legislative Advocacy Correspondence
Date Bill/Subject Author Description of Issue Position Notes/Status 9/17/25 SB 346 Durazo
Local Agencies: Transient Occupancy Taxes: Short-Term Rental Facilitator Request for Sign ature Letter to the Governor 9/17/25 SB 516 Ashby California Capital City Downtown Revitalization Act Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/16/25 AB 519 Berman Pet Broker Sales Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/16/25 SB 720 Asbhy Safer Streets Act Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/16/25 SB 639 Ashby Extension of Urban Level of Flood Protection Deadline Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/16/25 SB 456 Ashby Community Beautification Act Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/16/25 AB 564 Haney Cannabis Excise Tax: Rate Increase Repeal Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/15/25 SB 466 Caballero Drinking Water: Hexavalent Chromium: Civil Li ability: Exemption Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/15/25 SB 682 Allen
Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 9/15/25 AB 1223 Nguyen/Krell Sacramento Transportation Authority Modernization Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 8/26/25 SB 394 Allen Water Theft: Fire Hydrants Request for Signature Letter to the Governor 8/18/25 AB 564 Haney Cannabis Excise Tax: Rate Increase Repeal Support Senate Committee on Appropriations Position Letters 2025-2026
8/18/25 SB 456 Ashby Community Beautification Act Support Assembly Committee on Appropriations 8/18/25 SB 639 Ashby Extension of Urban Level of Flood Protection Deadline Co-sponsor Assembly Committee on Appropriations 8/18/25 SB 720 Ashby Safer Streets Act Support Assembly Committee on Appropriations 8/18/25 SB 601 Allen Water: Waste Discharge
Oppose Unless
Amended
Assembly Committee on Appropriations -
Coalition letter
8/14/25 Low-Income Household Water Assistance Program Establishment Act Support Letter to U.S. Senator Padilla 8/13/25 AB 1223 Nguyen/Krell Sacramento Transportation Authority Modernization Support 7/30/25 AB 476 Gonzalez Metal Theft Support Senate Appropriations Committee 7/30/25 SB 466 Caballero Drinking Water: Hexavalent Chromium: Civil Liability: Exemption Support Assemb ly Appropriations Committee 7/28/25
Funding for The Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) programs Support Letter to U.S. Senator Padilla 7/28/25 SB 346 Durazo
Local Agencies: Transient Occupancy Taxes: Short-Term Rental Facilitator Support
7/28/25
Funding for The Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) programs Support Letter to U.S. Senator Schiff 7/11/25 SB 72 Caballero The Californis Water Plan: Long Term Supply Targets Support Assembly Appropriations Committee 7/9/25 AB 519 Berman Pet Broker Sales Support
7/8/25 SB 639 Ashby Extension of Urban Level of Flood Protection Deadline Co-sponsor Assembly Committee on Water, Parks and
Wildlife
7/7/25 SB 516 Ashby California Capital City Downtown Revitalization Act Support Assembly Committee on Local
Government
7/2/25 SB 720 Ashby Safer Streets Act Support Assembly Committee on Transportation 7/2/25 SB 466 Caballero Drinking Water: Hexavalent Chromium: Ci vil Liability: Exemption Support Senate Judiciary Committee 6/25/25 2025/26 Budget
Support for AB 102 and SB 102 - Funding for the Agreements to Support Healthy Rivers and Landscapes Support
6/23/25 SB 394 Allen Water Theft: Fire Hydrants Support Assembly Judiciary Committee 6/20/25 AB 476 Gonzalez Metal Theft Support
Senate Business, Professions and Economic
Development Committee
6/20/25 AB 476 Gonzalez Metal Theft Support Senate Public Safety 6/16/25 SB 88 Caballero The Biomass Utilization for Carbon Reduction Act Support Assembly Revenue and Taxation
Committee
5/27/25 SB 466 Caballero Drinking Water: Hexavalent Chromium: Civil Liability: Exemption Support Senate Rules Committee 5/14/25 SB 682 Allen
Environmental health: product safety: perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances Support Senate Appropriations Committee 5/2/25 AB 564 Haney Cannabis Excise Tax: Rate Increase Repeal Support Assembly Revenue and Taxation
Committee
4/30/25 AB 1232 Avila Farias
Administrative Procedure Act:¬Proposed Regulations: Cost of Living Impact on Residents of the State. Support Assembly Judiciary Committee 4/30/25 SB 516 Ashby California Capital City Downtown Revitalization Act Support 4/24/25 SB 370 Ashby California Music Festival Preservation Grant Program Support 4/24/25 SB 466 Caballero Drinking Water: Hexavalent Chromium: Civil Liability: Exemption Support 4/23/25 SB 720 Ashby Safer Streets Act Support Senate Judiciary Committee 4/22/25 SB 639 Ashby Extension of Urban Level of Flood Protection Deadline Co-sponsor Senate Local Government Committee 4/22/25 AB 532 Ransom Water rate assistance program Support Coalition letter 4/17/25 SB 454 McNerney State Water Resources Control Board: PFAS Mitigation Program Support Coalition letter 4/9/25 AB 476 M. Gonz ilez Metal Theft Support if Amended 4/9/25 AB 1232 Avila Farias
Administrative Procedure Act:¬Proposed Regulations: Cost of Living Impact on Residents of the State. Support
Assm. Economic Development, Growth &
Household Impact Committee
4/9/25 SB 431 Arreguin
Assault and Battery: Public Utility Employees and Essential Infrastructure Workers Support
3/28/25 SB 720 Ashby Safer Streets Act Support
Senate Transportation Committee. Would
create an opt-in automated red light traffic
enforcement system.
3/26/25 SB 639 Ashby Extension of Urban Level of Flood Protection Deadline Co-sponsor Senate Committee on Natural Resources
and Water
3/10/25 SB 456 Ashby Community Beautification Act Support Would exempt muralists from having to
obtain a contractor's license
3/10/25 H.R. 1267
Gluesenkamp
Perez & Maloy Water Systems PFAS Liability Protection Act Support 3/6/25 AB 516 Kalra Clarifying Veterinary Technician and Assistant Duties Support Coalition letter 3/6/25 SB 602 Cortese Expanding Veterinary Access in Shelters Support Coalition letter 3/10/25 AB 514 Petrie-Norris Emergency Water Supplies Support Coalition letter 3/4/25 State Budget Request to Amend Governor's Budget Proposal re Proposition 4 Support Coalition letter expressing concern re
Governor's proposal to backfill General
Fund commitments with Prop 4 funds
3/3/25 State Budget California Film and Tax Credit expansion Support 2/14/25
WaterSense
Program
Letter to U.S. EPA requesting continued funding and operation of the WaterSense program Support Coalition letter
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected] September 15, 2025
The Honorable Gavin Newsom
1021 O Street, Suite 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 1223 (NGUYEN/KRELL) SACRAMENTO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MODERNIZATION – REQUEST FOR SIGNATURE
Dear Governor Newsom:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write to respectfully request that you sign AB 1223, which would make changes to the Sacramento Transportation Authority’s (STA) ability to impose a transactions and use tax (TUT) and the allowable expenditures from a TUT imposed by STA. AB 1223 also would authorize STA to issue bonds to finance costs of high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or other toll facilities within Sacramento County.
Existing law, the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act (LTAIA), gave counties the ability to finance transportation projects through local sales tax measures. However, current law is based on an outdated approach to transportation, focusing on roadways and limited transit options. It also confines STA to countywide sales tax measures.
AB 1223 would provide STA the flexibility to propose transportation funding measures in specific areas and ensure that revenue stays in the communities that voted for it. Currently, STA can only propose sales tax measures for the entire county. AB 1223 would allow communities to pursue sub-regional funding mechanisms tailored to their priorities, allowing City leaders to advance needed transportation projects. AB 1223 also would expand the scope of what transportation authorities are authorized to fund with revenue generated by a TUT. Adding projects that support infill or transit-oriented development in areas nominated by local governments would better enable the City to meet our housing, economic growth and climate goals.
AB 1223 would provide the tools needed to address the City’s and our region’s transportation challenges. For this reason, the City requests that you sign AB 1223. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation Committee
September 15, 2025
The Honorable Gavin Newsom, Governor
1021 O Street, Suite 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: SB 682 (Allen): Support
Dear Governor Newsom,
The California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) is proud to co-sponsor and strongly support SB 682 (Allen), which seeks to eradicate harmful forever chemicals from cleaning products, cookware, juvenile products, food packaging, ski wax, and dental floss. The undersigned coalition strongly endorses this vital policy effort to reduce human health impacts and environmental exposure to these chemicals. Consistent with our coalition’s core missions of both protecting public health and the environment and maintaining affordable essential public services, SB 682 is the most cost-efficient method for reducing baseline concentrations of PFAS in our water, wastewater and waste management processes.
In recent years, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have become a topic of public concern due to their high mobility and resistance to breaking down naturally as well as the persistent detection of PFAS compounds in people’s bodies and in the environment. A statewide source control approach is necessary to systematically remove PFAS from the stream of commerce, including in products which have a direct pathway to our watersheds and waste management systems.
Often referred to as “forever chemicals,” PFAS chemicals are both ubiquitous and indestructible. Removing PFAS at the end of their life cycle does not address the problem of ongoing exposure to the general public to PFAS from everyday products. In limited cases, PFAS can be removed from water and wastewater through advanced treatment technology. However, there is currently no technologically feasible method for the large-scale destruction of PFAS compounds. Instead, once removed, PFAS residuals are merely displaced to another waste stream to cycle back through the waste management process or transferred to a different environmental media. This is why SB 682’s focus on stopping PFAS at its source is vital.
PFAS chemicals are included in many products where they are safer alternatives available. As an example, ceramic cookware is available that shares the non- stick capabilities for a comparable price. This bill specifically targets consumer products where the use of PFAS chemicals is not essential or there are other options readily available.
While in some very limited cases, the source of PFAS contamination can be identified and addressed through industrial pre-treatment programs or other similar mechanisms, this is not generally the case. In 2020, the State Water Resources Control Board issued a statewide monitoring and reporting order that required wastewater agencies to monitor and report for PFAS in influent, effluent and biosolids. Monitoring data from this effort demonstrates that domestic discharges (residential and commercial influent) is the predominant pathway of PFAS entering wastewater systems, meaning that products people are using in their homes and businesses are contributing PFAS to wastewater systems through everyday uses that are not controllable through local enforcement or industrial pretreatment programs.
Moreover, regulatory efforts are underway that could have serious consequences for clean water agencies and their ratepayers. Last year, USEPA adopted Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for 6 PFAS chemicals in drinking water, and the State Water Resources Control Board has stated its intent to begin a proceeding this year to adopt a statewide MCL for PFAS consistent with the adopted Federal MCL. Drinking water MCLs are highly consequential for the regulated water community, including wastewater agencies, as they are often incorporated “by reference” into existing Basin Plans, thus imposing de facto limits for discharges to certain bodies of water. Removing PFAS from the stream of commerce before it enters our waterways and waste treatment systems is the most cost-effective way to address this issue.
Finally, as local public agencies begin the process of preparing for implementation of new and proposed PFAS regulations, affordability of essential services is a critical consideration. USEPA estimates that for drinking water systems to comply with the newly imposed Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for a handful of PFAS chemicals will result in annual cost impacts surpassing $1 billion. Water industry leaders contend these costs are likely much higher and could surpass $3 billion annually, and do not account for financial impacts beyond the drinking water system requirements. These are all costs that will be borne by California utility ratepayers.
For these reasons, the meaningful and comprehensive source control and pollution prevention strategy presented in SB 682 is the most cost effective and appropriate approach to reducing PFAS pollution in the environment.
CASA strongly supports SB 682 and requests your signature on this important bill.
We would be eager to discuss SB 682 in more detail with members of your Administration at their earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Jessica Gauger
Director of Legislative Advocacy & Public
Affairs
California Association of Sanitation Agencies
Melissa Sparks-Kranz
Legislative Advocate
League of California Cities
Brenley McKenna
Managing Director
WateResue CA
Nick Blair
Senior Policy Advocate
Association of California Water Agencies
Karen Cowan
Executive Director
California Stormwater Quality Association
Lorien Fono
Executive Director
Bay Area Clean Water Agencies
Andrea Abergel
Director of Water
California Municipal Utilities Association
Aaron Avery
Director of State Legislative Affairs
California Special Districts Association
Michael Moore
General Manager/CEO
East Valley Water District
Jackie Zipkin
General Manager
East Bay Dischargers Authority
Greg Thomas
General Manager
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Joe Mouawad, P.E.
General Manager
Eastern Municipal Water District
Jordan Damerel, PE
General Manager/District Engineer
Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District
Shivaji Deshmukh, P.E.
General Manager
Inland Empire Utilities Agencies
Robert C. Ferrante
Chief Engineer & General Manager
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
Dave Pedersen
General Manager
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Mike McCullough, MPA
Director of External Affairs
Monterey One Water
Rob Thompson
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District
Teresa Herrera, P.E.
Manager
Silicon Valley Clean Water
Mark Tomko
General Manager
Vallejo Flood & Wastewater District
Jason Dafforn, P.E.
General Manager
Valley Sanitary District
Craig D. Miller, P.E.
General Manager
Western Municipal Water District
Jason A. Martin
General Manager
Rancho California Water District
Roger S. Bailey
General Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Krista Bernasconi
Mayor
City of Roseville
Steve Jepsen
Executive Director
Clean Water SoCal
Kimberly A. Thorner
General Manager
Olivenhain Municipal Water District
Glenn Berch, P.E.
General Manager
Jurupa Community Services District
Carlos Quintero
General Manager
Sweetwater Authority
David Newman
Mayor
City of Thousand Oaks
Caity Maple
Councilmember – District 5
City of Sacramento
Sarah Zarate
Director
City of San Jose
Jan R. Lee
General Manager
Dublin San Ramon Services District
Curtis Larkin
Chair
SWANA California Chapters Legislative Task
Force
Christoph Dobson
General Manager
Sacramento Area Sewer District
September 15, 2025
The Honorable Gavin Newsom
Governor, State of California
1021 O Street, Suite 9000
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 466 (Caballero) – REQUEST FOR SIGNATURE
2 Dear Governor Newsom,
On behalf of the undersigned organizations, we respectfully request your signature on SB 466 (Caballero), the Chromium-6 MCL Compliance Safeguard Act. This measure provides critical legal protections for water providers diligently working to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) recently adopted hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL).
The new MCL of 10 parts per billion (ppb), effective October 1, 2024, requires larger water systems to achieve compliance within two years and smaller systems within up to four years.
Compliance will require significant investments in treatment facilities, pipelines, and infrastructure. For many communities across California, especially disadvantaged ones, the cost of these projects will exceed what ratepayers can reasonably bear. Utilities face significant bond issuance exceeding $1 billion which will increase rates by 100% in some communities, severely undermining water affordability.
SB 466 establishes a narrow and balanced safeguard. Water systems must still notify the public of any exceedances and remain accountable under a State Water Board–approved compliance plan, but they will not be deemed in violation of the hexavalent chromium MCL while implementing that plan or awaiting Board action on a submitted plan. This allows water providers to dedicate limited resources to constructing treatment solutions rather than defending against unnecessary litigation. These protections apply only to systems already meeting California’s enforceable total chromium standard, ensuring continued accountability and protection of public health.
This legislation is especially urgent given that State and federal funding streams such as the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) have not yet aligned to meet the immediate needs created by the Cr(VI) regulation. Proposition 4 (the Climate Bond) anticipated this challenge by explicitly making hexavalent chromium projects eligible for grant funding, but the timing of implementation has left many communities without the necessary assistance to move forward by the compliance deadlines. SB 466 provides a legal bridge that will prevent unnecessary litigation and financial strain while these systems pursue compliance.
The Human Right to Water, enshrined in California law, recognizes that every resident is entitled to safe, clean, affordable, and accessible water. SB 466 helps fulfill that commitment by ensuring compliance efforts with the new Cr(VI) MCL are not undermined by avoidable lawsuits that drain resources from the very communities most in need of assistance.
For these reasons, the undersigned organizations strongly support SB 466 and respectfully urge your signature.
If you have any questions about this request, please contact Scott Burritt at [email protected].
Sincerely,
3 J. M. Barrett
General Manager
Coachella Valley Water District
Timothy Worley, PhD
Managing Director
Community Water Systems Alliance
Chelsea Haines
State Regulatory Director
Association of California Water Agencies
Andrea Abergel
Director of Water
California Municipal Utilities Association
Marina D. West, PG
General Manager
Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency
John Jansons
City Manager
City of Kerman
Caity Maple
Chair, Law and Legislation Committee
City of Sacramento
Justen Cole
Director of Utilities
City of Vacaville Utilities Department
Courtney Lindberg
Public Works & Utilities Director
City of Watsonville
William Pattison
City Manager
Coachella Water Authority
Michael S. Amabile
Mayor
City of Los Banos
Aaron Avery
Director of State Legislative Affairs
California Special District Association
Melissa Sparks-Kranz
Legislative Advocate
League of California Cities
Gretchen Gutierrez
Chief Executive Officer
Desert Valleys Builders Association
Sarah Johnson
General Manager
Joshua Basin Water District
Jeremy Wolf
Legislative Program Manager
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Paul E. Shoenberger, P.E.
General Manager
Mesa Water District
Michele Donze
General Manager
Myoma Dunes Mutual Water Company
Dennis D. LaMoreaux
General Manager
Palmdale Water District
Federico Barajas
Executive Director
San Luis Delta Mendota Water Authority
4 Taj Dufour
Engineering Manager
Soquel Creek Water District
Craig D. Miller, P.E.
General Manager
Western Municipal Water District
Brian Macy
General Manager
Mission Springs Water District
Gregory M. Krauss
Chief of Operations
City of Daly City
Tony Culver
General Manager
Hi-Desert Water District
Reymundo Trejo
General Manager
Indio Water Authority
Maria Encinas
Water Resources Program Manager
City of Patterson
6HSWHPEHU 1, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
26WUHHW6XLWH
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 564 (HANEY) CANNABIS EXCISE TAX: RATE INCREASE REPEAL - 5(48(67)25 6,*1$785(
Dear *RYHUQRU1HZVRP:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write WRUHVSHFIXOO\UHTXHVWWKDW\RXVLJQ AB 564 (Haney). AB 564 would make specified changes to the Canna bis Excise Tax rate, specifically, delaying the effective period of an increase from the 2025-26 fiscal year to the 2030-31 fiscal year.
The legal cannabis industry in California is being negatively impacted by taxes, fees, and other regulation compliance costs, driving licensed cannabis businesses out of the market. Fully licensed, legal businesses in California capture just 40% of the state’s entire market, while the underground illicit market accounts for 60% of the overall market.
Lower rates will encourage customers to patronize the legal marketplace, supporting both businesses and providing tax revenue in our community. On the contrary, raising taxes on legal products will drive more consumers away from the regulated market and toward illegal shops, websites, and delivery services where products are sold at a fraction of the price and remain untested, unsafe, and untaxed.
Increasing the state excise tax will have a negative imp act on the City’s local businesses. Over 70% of our gross receipts for cannabis businesses last fiscal year came from non-cultivation so an increase in the s tate excise tax would hit our local industry hard. This would also contradict equity efforts by placing disproportionate strain on our small and diverse business owners.
For the reasons stated above, the City respectfully requests youVLJQ AB 564. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected],
Chair, Law and Legislation
Committee
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected]
August 18, 2025
Assemblymember Buffy Wicks
Chair, Assembly Committee on Appropriations
1021 O Street, Suite 8220
RE: SB 456 (ASHBY) COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION ACT - SUPPORT Dear Assemblymember Wicks:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write to express our support of SB 456. This bill would permit an artise to create a mural, as defined, without a license from the California State Licensing Board (CSLB).
The City recognizes that public art and murals are proven drivers of community and economic health, attracting tourists, supporting jobs, generating revenue, and improving public safety and well-being. However, in 2023, public notices began being issued to municipalities indicating that muralists fall within the definition of a "contractor" under Business and Professions Code section 7026. As a result, muralists must carry a contractor's license if they undertake a mural on a building for more than $500.
Additionally, per Business and Professions Code section 7028.15 (e), city staff may be fined for knowingly hiring an unlicensed muralist. Due to these licensure requirements, cities across California have had to cease or stall the implementation of mural projects.
To qualify for these commercial licenses, muralists must accumulate four years of specialized experience under a licensed contractor, pass the Law and Business examination, and pay annual licensing fees. These requirements create unnecessary barriers to work on public art projects and expose city employees and artists to fines if such requirements are not met.
Muralists provide a fundamentally different service than a painting contractor, as their work is an artistic expression rather than addressing the structural integrity of a building. It is appropriate to provide a narrow exception to the state’s licensing requirements for muralists, as SB 456 seeks to provide them with the flexibility to continue their artistic expression.SB 456 would provide a critical step for artists living and working in Sacramento to support themselves while developing the City’s arts scene though successful projects such as the Wide Open Walls mural festival.
Should you have any questions about our support, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Councilmember Caity Maple
City of Sacramento, District 5
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected]
6HSWHPEHU, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ 1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
2 6WUHHW6XLWH
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 639 (ASHBY) – =21,1*
6$&5$0(1726$1-2$48,19$//(<5(48(67)256,*1$785(
Dear *RYHUQRU1HZVRP:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City) ZKLFKLVDFRsponsor of SB 639 (Ashby),ZULWHWRUHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWWKDW \RXVLJQ6%
7KLVOHJLVODWLRQwould extend the deadline IURPWRfor specified projects in the City RI 6DFUDPHQWRWKHCountLHV of Sacramento DQG6XWWHUDQGWKH&LW\RI0DU\VYLOOHto achieve the required urban level of flood protection.
Background
As of July 1, 2016, provisions of the State Law (SB 5) and the City Code (17.810) have required the City to make specific findings prior to approving new development within a flood hazard zone. The purpose is to ensure that development projects will have protection from a 200-year flood event or will achieve that protection by December 31, 2025.
The four possible findings are summarized as:
Existing facilities provide ULOP in urban areas or meet the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) standard in non-urbanized areas.
Conditions on the project will protect it to the applicable standard. The local flood management agency has made adequate progress on a flood system providing the applicable level of protection. For urban and urbanizing areas protected by project levees, ULOP will be achieved by December 31, 2025.
The property in an undetermined risk area has met ULOP based on substantial evidence.
Time Extension Required
All the capital improvements required to handle the State-defined 200-year event have been completed except for the following:
A portion of the Natomas levee improvements
A portion of the Beach Lake levee improvements
Sump 89 Outfall Replacement Project (City-led project) While these projects are anticipated to be completed in 2025, any delays in the complex U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit process and construction could lead to delaying completion past the end of 2025. Without an extension, the City would be facing a de facto suspension of approvals by imposing cost-prohibitive conditions for the majority of projects, such as requiring new buildings to be elevated 10 or more feet above ground level. There would be significant impacts to the City and our efforts to build more housing and other projects. For example, in the Natomas Sub-area there are several projects that could be delayed, including a new hospital and various residential projects, which together could add up to approximately 1,900 residential units. In the Beach Lake Sub-area, approximately 735 new residential units could be hindered.
Compliance can be achieved through an extension of the deadline through SB 639. Two such legislative extensions have already been adopted for the City of West Sacramento and Mossdale Tract in the CIty of Lathrop (San Joaquin County).
For the reasons stated above, the City UHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWVWKDW\RXVLJQ SB 639. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation
Committee
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected]
6HSWHPEHU, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
1022Street, 6XLWH
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 720 (ASHBY) SAFER STREETS ACT - 5(48(67)256,*1$785( Dear *RYHUQRU1HZVRP:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write WRUHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWWKDW\RXVLJQ SB 720 (Ashby), the Safer Streets Act. SB 720 creates an opt-in program for local governments to utilize an automated red light traffic enforcement system.
Between 2013-2022, 324 people lost their lives on Sacramento streets and 837 were severely injured. Sacramento has the highest fatalities per 100k of large and mid-size cities in California, as shown below.
Through our Vision Zero Transportation Safety program, we apply many tools to address this crisis including infrastructure investments and education. Most recently in March 2025, the City of Sacramento City Council approved a small Transportation Safety Team that will focus on quick builds.
Infrastructure and education are not enough. Saving lives requires using the entire toolbox and red light cameras are a proven, effective enforcement method. As Sacramento and other California cities face budget challenges, our already strained Police Department struggles for capacity to address transporta tion safety. Use of automated systems will help us with enforcement as we continue to invest in infrastructure and education.
SB 720 would create the Safer Streets Program, a program with a more equitable approach to increasing safety for people walking, bicycling, and driving. The bill removes bias, ensuring collaboration with local partners, and establishing reasonable penalties that are civil rather than criminal.
Revenue from the Safer Streets Program would be invested back into the City for safer streets initiatives including programs and quick build interventions designed to save lives.
For the reasons stated above, the City respectfully requests you VLJQ SB 720. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation
Committee
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected]
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected] 6HSWHPEHU, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
1021 O Street, Suite
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: AB 519 (BERMAN) PET BROKER SALES – 5(48(67)256,*1$785( *RYHUQRU1HZVRP:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write WRUHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVW\RXVLJQ AB 519. Misleading marketing tactics, predatory financial behaviors, and a gap in regulations are allowing online brokers to take advantage of consumers and allowing puppy mills to continue to reach Californians when searching for a new companion. AB 519 addresses this predatory behavior by prohibiting the sale of dogs, cats, and rabbits by third-party sellers, or “brokers”.
By cutting out the middlemen, this bill is the next step toward eliminating the puppy mill pipeline into California.
AB 519 is part of a three-bill package focused on closing the final valve of the puppy mill pipeline into California. As highlighted in the LA Times investigation released this fall, misleading marketing tactics, predatory financial behaviors, and gaps in regulations are allowing online pet brokers to take advantage of California consumers, allowing puppy mills - a predatory industry that makes cruel breeding conditions profitable by misleading consumers with wholesome images and minimal information - to continue to reach Californians at a time when California shelters are overflowing with adoptable puppies, kittens, dogs and cats.
Third-party pet sellers, or brokers, facilitate the sale of commercially bred animals for profit, utilizing tactics such as requiring exorbitant nonrefundable deposits before disclosing any information about where an animal comes from, using misleading images and messaging to suggest an animal has been bred locally, and stating their animals come from only "gold standard" breeders (in actuality, the majority of breed associations, including the American Kennel Club, discourage or outright prohibit the use of brokers). Misled families often then find themselves dealing with the health and behavioral issues resulting from the conditions their new pet was raised and transported in.
Opposition to this bill claim that without brokers, residents will not be able to find their preferred breed of puppy, particularly hunters and sportsmen who rely on particular working breeds. This is simply not the case. Californians will still have access to countless breeders both within and outside California, along with breed-specific rescues and local shelters who are seeing more purebred dogs and puppies surrendered than any time in recent history.
Opponents also suggest that by being USDA-licensed, the commercial breeders they source from and the brokers they employ are highly regulated and ensure the highest level of welfare for the animals. This is absolutely not the case. A recent audit of USDA-licensed breeders and brokers found a severe lack of oversight and enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act, with animals frequently left to suffer in facilities - puppy mills - without proper veterinary care, food, clean water, or shelter.
At a time when our state’s shelters are overflowing with animals waiting for adoption, it is imperative that the state continueV its commitment to shutting down the puppy mill pipeline into the state. For this reason, the City UHTXHVWVWKDW\RXVLJQ AB 519. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation Committee
6HSWHPEHU, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
2 6WUHHW6XLWH
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 516 (ASHBY) CALIFORNIA CAPITAL CITY DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION ACT – 5(48(67 )256,*1$785(
Dear *RYHUQRU1HZVRP
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write to UHVSHFWIXOO\ UHTXHVW WKDW \RX VLJQ SB 516 (Ashby), which will help catalyze housing production, increase higher educational and high-quality employment opportunities, and enhance economic diversification in downtown Sacramen to through strategic multi-jurisdictional investment.
As the capital city of the nation’s largest state, Sacramento is uniquely reliant upon the state of California workforce due to the high concentration of department headquarters in and around downtown. Based on Department of General Services (DGS) and CoStar data, over 60% of downtown Sacramento’s total office market is owned or leased by California state agencies. A vast majority of those spaces are tax-exempt a nd do not generate property tax revenue which is needed to sustain essential services provided by local jurisdictions and to ensure a safe and attractive downtown core.
Through a continued focus on streamlining and providing incentives for housing production, Sacramento became the first municipality in the state to be designated as a pro-housing jurisdiction. Despite these pro-housing policies, the city achieved only 42% of the annual housing production identified by the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) in 2024. Approval and implementation of SB 516 will provide a sound foundation for attracting the resources needed to help deliver mid-to-high density housing projects at all levels of affordability in the neighborhoods surrounding the State Capitol and will serve as a model for a sustainable livability strategy which may be scaled in urban centers throughout the state.
Downtown Sacramento has seen an unprecedented level of interest over the past decade but the empty offices, lack of investment and declining values have left it struggling for an economic foothold. Without a strategic multi- jurisdictional partnership and financial participation at state and local levels, downtown Sacramento will miss the moment to create a sustainable future by increasing housing production and focusing on new economic and educational diversification. SB 516 provides the framework to accomplish these goals and solidify the future for the capital city’s central neighborhood.
For the reasons stated above, the City requests \RX VLJQ SB 516. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at [email protected], or 916-808-7395.
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation
Committee
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected] y,
Office of Sacramento City Councilmember Caity Maple
New City Hall, 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 808-7005 | Email: [email protected] 6HSWHPEHU, 2025
7KH+RQRUDEOH*DYLQ1HZVRP
*RYHUQRU6WDWHRI&DOLIRUQLD
1021 O Street, Suite
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 346 (DURAZO) LOCAL AGENCIES: TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES: SHORT-TERM RENTAL FACILITATOR –5(48(67)256,*1$785(
Dear *RYHUQRU1HZVRP:
On behalf of the City of Sacramento (City), I write WRUHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWWKDW\RXVLJQ SB 346, which would better equip cities to enforce local ordinances related to short-term rentals, including the collection and remittance of transient occupancy taxes (TOT).
Short-term rentals are regulated exclusively at the local level via the adoption of an ordinance that often includes regulations on permitting, tax compliance, noise, parking, occupancy, as well as other responsibilities for hosts and short-term rental facilitators. In some instances, ordinances limit the number of short-term rentals allowed to operate lawfully, other ordinances ban short-term rentals entirely.
Short-term rentals can present numerous challenges to neighborhoods and adjacent property owners. They may create additional noise, traffic, parking, and public safety issues, decrease available housing stock, and in some cases turn residential neighborhoods into de-facto hotel rows, collectively creating additional demands on local public service providers.
Unfortunately, the enforcement of TOT ordinances and the collection and remittance of these taxes from short-term rentals can be inconsistent, even when voluntary collection agreements are in place with a short-term rental facilitator. Cities lack access to property addresses or other property-related information, even under these agreements, resulting in a difficult choice to either accept tax payments without any way to verify their accuracy and legality or attempt to collect taxes directly from property owners—a costly and time-consuming process. Meanwhile, short-term rental facilitators have full knowledge of these properties’ locations and resist disclosing this information.
Cities can only compel short-term rental facilitators to disclose this critical information through certain legal action, such as subpoenas. This is not how oversight of public dollars should work.
SB 346 would address the above issues by providing cities with the physical address of each short-term rental listed on the facilitator’s website and full audit authority of TOT dollars. These changes would ensure the correct amount of TOT is being collected and remitted and would allow for more efficient enforcement against unlicensed units. The City has a local ordinance requiring short-term rental platforms provide us information and SB 346 is in alignment with what the City requests locally.
For the reasons stated above, the City UHVSHFWIXOO\UHTXHVWVWKDW\RXVLJQ SB 346. If there are any questions about the City’s position, please contact Consuelo Hernandez, Director of Governmental Affairs, at 916-808-7395 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chair, Law and Legislation Committee