Sacramento City Council
February 10, 2026

City of Sacramento
City Council - 2PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
[Pass for Publication] The Enclave at Airport Road (P25-010) File ID: 2026-00481
Location: 3600 Airport Road, APN: 225-0150-055-0000, District 3 Recommendation: 1) Review: a) a Resolution determining the project is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning); b) an Ordinance approving the Enclave at Airport Road Development Agreement between the City of Sacramento and Next Generation Capital LLC (the “landowner”); c) an Ordinance rezoning 2.03-acres from the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling zone and the Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development (R-1A-PUD); d) a Resolution for Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendments to the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD Schematic Plan and Guidelines to add the project site into the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD boundary and amend development standards for residential development; e) a Resolution adopting findings of fact and conditions of approval for: i) a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 2.03-acres into 32 residential lots and eight common lots including one pedestrian access lot, five landscaped lots, and two private roads; and ii) Site Plan and Design Review of the Tentative Subdivision Map layout, the demolition of an existing single-unit dwelling and accessory structures, and the construction of 32 single-unit dwellings and associated site improvements; and 2) pass for publication the Ordinance titles per City Charter section 32(c) to be considered on February 24, 2026.

Contact: Deja Harris, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5853, [email protected]; Zachary Dahla, Senior Planner, (916) 808-5584, [email protected]; Community Development Department
Presenter: Deja Harris, Associate Planner, (916) 808-5853, [email protected] , Community Development Department
Applicant: Andrew MacDonald, Cartwright Nor Cal, Inc., 3010 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 160, Roseville, CA 95661
Property Owner: Next Generation Capital, LLC., 2935 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 205, Gold River, CA 95670

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Background
3-Resolution: Environmental Exemption
4-Ordinance: Development Agreement
5-Exhibit A: Development Agreement
6-Ordinance: Rezone
7-Exhibit A: Rezone Exhibit
8-Resolution: Natomas Crossing PUD Guidelines and Schematic Plan Amendment 9-Exhibit A: Natomas Crossing PUD Schematic
10-Exhibit B: Natomas Crossing PUD Guidelines
11-Resolution: Findings of Facts and Conditions of Approval for Tentative Subdivision Map, and Site Plan and Design Review
12-Exhibit A: Project Plans
13-Community Comments
Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The applicant is requesting to construct a compact, small-lot residential subdivision consisting of 32 detached single-unit residences and associated site improvements on a 2.03 gross acre site in North Natomas. The project site is currently zoned Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) and is not located within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) or covered by an active Development Agreement for North Natomas Financing Plan implementation. As part of this project, the applicant is requesting to annex into the adjacent Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development.

Developing within the PUD would require the applicant to amend the PUD to incorporate development standards for a "compact small-lot residential development type" which is currently not included in the PUD. Annexing the site into the PUD would also require a procedural rezone, with no change to the base zone, to identify the site’s inclusion in the PUD. Given the R-1A zoning designation, the project is required to comply with the development standards of the Missing Middle Housing ordinance that are not superseded by the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD development guidelines. This project requires the following entitlements:

1. Development Agreement between the City of Sacramento and the landowner.

2. Rezone of 2.03-acres from the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) zone and Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development.

3. PUD Schematic Plan Amendment to amend the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD to amend the PUD boundary to include the project site and designate the site for residential.

4. PUD Guidelines Amendment to the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD to amend the development

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
standards related to residential developments to include standards specific to compact, smalllot residential developments.

5. Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 2.03-acres into 32 residential lots and 8 commons lots, including 1 pedestrian access lot, 5 landscaped lots, and 2 private roads.

6. Site Plan and Design Review to review the Tentative Subdivision Map layout, the demolition of the existing structures, and the construction of the 32 single-unit dwelling subdivision and associated site improvements in R-1A-PUD zone.

Development Agreements and Rezones require approval from the City Council. In accordance with Sacramento City Code section 17.808.310, all entitlements associated with a single development proposal are reviewed and decided at the highest level required for the project. Thus, the project requires a recommendation from the Planning and Design Commission to forward to the City Council for final decision.

Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments: As part of the application review process, the proposed project was routed to North Natomas Community Association, Natomas Community Association, North Natomas Community Coalition, Natomas Chamber of Commerce, Preservation Sacramento, Civic Thread, Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, and Region Builders, House Sac, and Sacramento Housing Alliance.

Staff received a comment letter from North Natomas Community Coalition (NNCC) expressing their support for the infill development, specifically the connection to the future pedestrian pathway along Airport Road.

Staff received one email from a nearby resident opposed to the residential development. The resident expressed concerns related to traffic, limited on-street parking and safety.

Staff Response: The proposed project has been evaluated by the Fire Department and Department of Public Works to confirm compliance with City Code for adequate site circulation, roadway design, emergency vehicle access and to ensure the use will not create any congestion on adjacent public roadways. The street along Tanzanite Avenue will accommodate on-street parking. Additionally, 76 parking spaces are provided within the development including 12 guest parking spaces.

Staff posted the site with an early notice at time of planning application submittal. Staff also mailed hearing notices to all property owners and residents within 500 feet of the project site and posted the site 10 days prior to the public hearing. At the time of writing this report, staff has not received any comments, aside from those mentioned above.

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
Policy Considerations:
2040 General Plan
The 2040 General Plan designation for the project site is Neighborhood (N). The General Plan recognizes that Neighborhood designated areas are intended to maintain and enhance livability and sense of place. The Neighborhood designation is primarily comprised of residential uses, with some complementary neighborhood-serving commercial and public uses. The proposed single-unit subdivision is consistent with the N designation in that it redevelops an underutilized site in close proximity to schools, parks, and existing residential subdivisions with a compatible, denser residential use that fosters complete neighborhoods through enhanced pedestrian connections and buildings that engage the street.

In addition to the project’s consistency with the N designation, staff also finds that the project is consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:

Goal LUP-2. Balanced and connected community with thriving neighborhoods and centers and development intensities linked to transit.

Policy LUP-2.1 Overall Balance of Uses. The City should encourage a balance and a mix of employment, residential, commercial, cultural, and tourism-related uses, as well as a full range of amenities and services necessary to support a thriving city.

Policy LUP-2.5 Design for Connectivity. The City shall require that all new development maximizes existing and new connections with surroundings and with centers, corridors, parks, and neighborhoods to enhance efficient and direct pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle movement.

When feasible, grid patterns should be utilized to facilitate multiple routes.

Staff Response: The proposed project is consistent with the above goal and policies in that it facilitates a compact Missing Middle housing type that diversifies the housing stock and homeownership opportunities near educational and recreational amenities, such as the adjacent Tanzanite Community Park and the future multi-modal pedestrian pathway along Airport Road. The proposed project achieves a higher density to reflect current market demand for compact, for-sale residential developments through an efficient grid layout that maximizes land use by incorporating elements such as alley access, small lots, and reduced curb cuts while taking design cues from the adjacent neighborhoods. Furthermore, the project has been designed to consider the recreational amenities in its proximity to create synergy between a denser residential development and pedestrian/recreational amenities available to future residents. This is highlighted by the provided pedestrian access easement connecting to Airport Road and the enhanced building elevations along Tanzanite, providing new natural surveillance with "eyes on the street" near the park.

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
Goal LUP-4. Walkable, transit-oriented centers and corridors that concentrate new jobs, housing, and entertainment opportunities to support frequent, reliable transit service and foster connected, accessible neighborhoods.

Policy LUP-4.7 Visual and Physical Character. Using development standards and design standards/guidelines, the City shall promote development patterns and streetscape improvements that transform the visual and physical character of automobile-oriented corridors to create a positive impact on the human and natural systems that interact with them.

Policy LUP-4.8 Buildings that Engage the Street. The City shall require buildings to be oriented to and actively engage and enhance the public realm through techniques such as building orientation, build-to and setback lines, façade articulation, ground-floor transparency, and location of parking.

Policy LUP-4.10 Multi-Modal Access. The City shall require that new development provide bicycle, pedestrian, and transit access where appropriate to reduce the need for onsite parking and to improve the pedestrian experience within corridors and centers with street trees and landscaping.

Staff Response: The project is consistent with the goal and policies above in that the residential development has been designed to incorporate materials that are consistent with existing residential subdivisions in the area. The project provides a side-on condition along Tanzanite Avenue that includes enhanced tree coverage, shrubs and grass. The development will provide a continuation of the existing building line to the east, along Tanzanite Avenue, making the design appearance feel intended and “complete”. The project proposes enhanced pedestrian and bikeway connections between the development and the future multi-modal pedestrian pathway along Airport Road via a private access easement for residents. The house façades incorporate planar changes to create visual interest and variation of massing.

Additionally, the homes have been designed to minimize a garage forward design with forward facing architectural elements, such as roof eaves, and porches.

Goal LUP-6. A city of healthy, livable, “complete neighborhoods” that provide for residents’ daily needs within easy walking or biking distance from home.

Policy LUP-6.2 Range of Residential Development Intensities. The City shall allow for a range of residential development intensities throughout the community to cultivate a mix of housing types at varying sales price points and rental rates, provide options for residents of all income levels, and protect existing residents from displacement.

Policy LUP-6.5 Established Neighborhoods. The City should encourage new development to respect the pedestrian-scale, pre-automobile form, and lush urban forest that typifies

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
established neighborhoods and contributes to their sense of place.

Policy LUP-6.7 Architectural Variations. The City should encourage building placement variations, roofline variations, architectural projections, and other embellishments to enhance the visual interest along residential streets.

Staff Response: The project is consistent with the goal and policies above in that the proposed development utilizes small-lot sizes (average of 1,871 sq. ft.) designed to meet market trends while providing architectural style that is compatible and integrated well with the existing neighborhood. The homes will be affordable by design, providing diversity in housing type, scale, and income point. Each floor plan includes designated office space to accommodate growing telecommuting trends.

North Natomas Community Plan
The project site is located within the North Natomas Community Plan Area of the 2040 General Plan.

The vision of the Community Plan Area is to exemplify a culturally diverse, healthy, and friendly place to live, with safe neighborhoods, walkable and bikeable streets, vibrant and unique public spaces and attractions, and high-quality new development. This project is consistent with the vision of the community plan Area in that the use provides a high-quality new development and improves existing bicycle and pedestrian connectivity. Staff also finds that the project is also consistent with the following North Natomas Community Plan (NNCP) policy:

Policy NN-LUP 3: Financing Plan. The City shall require all property owners in the Plan area to: 1) participate equitably in the financing mechanisms necessary to finance the design, engineering, and construction of all library, fire, police, street, traffic, water, sewer, drainage improvements and all monitoring programs provided for in this Plan, and 2) pay an equitable share of all the costs incurred in the process of development of the Financing Plan.

Guarantees for this shall be via development agreements or other means acceptable to the City staff. All property owners in North Natomas will be required to reimburse the City in an equitable manner for all planning expenses incurred in developing this Community Plan and related documents. The costs will be divided equally by each acre receiving urban land use designations by this Plan. Payment of this cost will be a condition of the development agreements.

Staff Response: The project is required to enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Sacramento, which is the binding mechanism that requires the landowner to participate in the North Natomas Financing Plan. The North Natomas Finance Plan identifies and sources dollars to key infrastructure improvements within the Plan Area.

Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
The subject site is annexing into Area 2 of the Natomas Crossing PUD, which was originally adopted in 1997. While the PUD does not contain specific goals or policies exclusive to residential developments, it establishes standards and guidelines that apply to residential development, within the designated development area. These guidelines focus on ensuring compatibility with the surrounding context and achieving high-quality site planning and architectural design. Key standards that apply to the proposed residential development include:
· Building Design and Materials: Variation in building facades should be achieved, in part, by using a variety of materials along each street, including, but not limited to, stucco, wood siding, stone and brick. Street elevations should be broken with porches, reveals, recesses, trim elements and other architectural features to provide visual interest. · Circulation and Parking: Pedestrian walkways that connect residential neighborhoods to the surrounding community are encouraged. Surface parking lots for medium and high density units shall be located away from the adjacent roadways, to the rear of the buildings.

Staff Response: This project includes a landscaped pedestrian connection to the west, to connect the new residences directly to the future multi-use path at Airport Road. Parking for this site is located away from the public roadway with spaces located at the interior of the site and screened from public view by the buildings. The proposed residential development is consistent with these standards and guidelines, ensuring compatibility with the surrounding development and contributing to the overall vision for Area 2 of the Natomas Crossing PUD.

The project utilizes a mix of materials along with push/pull elements and porches along highly visible facades to create an enhanced, pedestrian-friendly development that aligns with the intended character of the area.

Environmental Considerations: On February 27, 2024, the City of Sacramento adopted the 2040 General Plan, which became effective on March 28, 2024. The City of Sacramento also certified a Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) associated with the 2040 General Plan on February 27, 2024. The General Plan MEIR is a master EIR, prepared pursuant to Section 15169 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.). The General Plan MEIR analyzed full implementation of the General Plan and identified measures to mitigate the significant adverse impacts associated with the General Plan to the maximum extent feasible.

Pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, where a project is consistent with the development density established for a property under an existing general plan or zoning ordinance for which the City already certified an EIR, additional environmental review is not required “except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.”
The City prepared a Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist that supports the conclusion that the

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026
proposed project would not result in any significant impacts that: 1) were peculiar to the project or the project site; 2) were not identified as a significant effect in the General Plan MEIR; 3) were potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior MEIR prepared for the General Plan; or 4) were previously identified significant effects, and which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan MEIR was certified, were determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the General Plan MEIR.

The Environmental Services Manager has, based upon the analysis and conclusions of the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, the project is exempt from further review. The Initial Study/15183 Checklist is available on the City’s EIR webpage at:
https://www.cityofsacramento.gov/community-development/planning/environmental/impact-reports 200-Year Flood Protection: State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code chapter 17.810 require that the City must make specific findings prior to approving certain entitlements for projects within a flood hazard zone. The project site is within a flood hazard zone and is an area covered by Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Improvements to the State Plan of Flood Control System, and specific findings related to the level of protection have been incorporated as part of this project. Even though the project site is within a flood hazard zone, the facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control or other flood management facilities protect the project to the urban level of flood protection. This is based on the SAFCA Urban Level of Flood Protection Engineer’s Reports accepted by the City Council on October 21, 2025 (Resolution No. 2025-0283).

Rationale for Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council approve the project based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed within Attachments 3-11. The proposal complies with the goals and policies of the 2040 General Plan in that it activates an underdeveloped infill site with dense development that maximizes existing infrastructure in close proximity to schools and parks.

Planning Staff supports the new development as the project creates additional homeownership opportunities and integrates well with its surrounding environment, is appropriately scaled in height and massing, and provides a quality architectural design that is compatible with the adjacent residential development.

Financial Considerations: Not applicable.

Economic Impacts: Not applicable.

Sustainability: Not applicable.

Commission/Committee Action: On January 22, 2026, the Planning and Design Commission voted unanimously to pass a motion recommending that the City council approve the proposed project.

File ID: 2026-00481 2/10/2026

Figure 1: Vicinity Map

Project Vicinity/ Land Use Context
The project site is located at a 2.03-acre site within the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R1A) zone at the northeast corner of Airport Road and Tanzanite Avenue. The site is developed with an existing single-family home and accessory structures and is surrounded by existing single-unit residential development, including single-unit subdivisions to the north, east, and west and a rural residential property to the south across Tanzanite Avenue. The project is immediately adjacent to the planned multi-use path that runs along Airport Road and the Tanzanite Community Park, approximately 125 feet southeast of the site. Figure 1 illustrates the surrounding land uses in relation to the subject project’s site.

Table 1: Surrounding Zoning and Uses
Direction: Zoning: Use:

North Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Residential South Agriculture (A) Residential
East Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Residential West Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Residential Background Information
The subject site is a remainder lot from the previous Machado Estates residential development which borders the site to the north and east. The Sacramento City Council approved the Machado Estates project on February 22, 2005, which included entitlements to subdivide an 8.7-acre parcel with a 2-acre remainder lot to contain the existing singleunit dwelling and 6.7-acres for the development of 78 single unit dwellings (P04-114). As part of the project, the 6.7-acre portion of the property that was subdivided was placed within the Natomas Crossing Planned Unit Development. However, the project site and its single-unit dwelling were not incorporated into the Natomas Crossing PUD.

Table 2: Site and Project Information
General Plan Designation:

Neighborhood (N)
Minimum Density: 7 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac)
Floor Area Ratio: 0 – 1.0
Community Plan Area: North Natomas
Housing Element Inventory Site: No
Existing Planned Unit Development
(PUD): N/A
Proposed Planned Unit Development
(PUD): Natomas Crossing Area 2
Existing Zoning of Site: Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) Proposed Zoning of Site: Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) Total Parcel Area: 2.03 gross acres
Existing Use of Site: Single Family Residential
Density 16 dwelling units/net acre
Parking District: Suburban
Design Review District: Citywide
Figure 2: Existing Conditions – Airport Road
Figure 3: Site Plan
Entitlement Review
The applicant is requesting to demolish the existing on-site structures to subdivide the parcel into 32 residential lots and eight common lots to facilitate the construction of a 32- unit single-unit subdivision. This also includes placing the subject site into the Natomas Crossing Planned Unit Development and new development standards to accommodate a medium-density alley infill housing development on this site. In order to develop this project, the following entitlements are requested: Development Agreement, Rezone, Planned Unit Development Amendments, Tentative Subdivision Map, and Site Plan and Design Review. Pursuant to Sacramento City Code (SCC) 17.808.230.B.2, the Planning and Design Commission will consider and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested entitlements. The recommendations of the Planning and Design Commission will be forwarded to the City Council for final action.

Development Agreement
All development of vacant property within the North Natomas Community Plan area requires the landowner(s) to enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Sacramento (NN.LUP 3). The Development Agreement ensures that proposed and subsequent development will happen in an orderly manner and that developers participate in the North Natomas Finance Plan. The Finance Plan is the mechanism that ensures the necessary public infrastructure is adequately provided as the North Natomas community builds-out over time. The Development Agreement that was in place for the area has expired, so a new agreement is required for this project. The North Natomas Development Agreement is an approved form by the City Council that cannot be modified by the applicant or staff. Special conditions unique to the project can be included on an as-needed basis.

Rezone
The 2.03-acre property is located within the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) zone; As part of the project, the applicant team is requesting the parcel be annexed into the adjacent Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD. To annex the parcel into the PUD area, the project would also require a rezone from the R-1A zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling and the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD (R-1A-PUD) zone. There is no change to the base zone as part of this request. SCC section 17.808.230.C.1.D requires the following findings be made to approve a rezone:
1) the rezone is consistent with the applicable general plan designation, use, and development standards; the goals, policies, or other provisions of the general plan; and any applicable specific plan; and
2) the amendment promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City.

The proposed rezone is consistent with the General Plan “Neighborhood” land use designation which encourages the development of residential uses, neighborhood support uses and neighborhood-serving commercial uses. Residential development is an allowed use at the proposed density of 16 dwelling units per net acre. Furthermore, there is no change to the base zone or applicable uses as part of this rezone request. The rezone is requested to accommodate the PUD designation as described in the PUD amendment analysis.

The rezone further promotes the public, health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City by providing diverse housing types in an established residential neighborhood. The proposed development will provide for housing variety and pedestrian amenities that connect the medium density residential development to nearby parks and neighborhoods and addresses the community vision for a diversity in housing types, consistent with 2040 General Plan policies.

Planned Unit Development Guidelines and Schematic Amendment The project site is not located within a Planned Unit Development (PUD) but is immediately adjacent to the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD, which borders the project site to the north and east. As part of the project, the applicant is seeking to incorporate the site into the adjacent Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD and is requesting amendments to the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD Schematic Plan and Guidelines.

The proposed PUD Schematic Plan amendment would update the Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD to depict the subject site within the PUD boundary and designate it for residential uses on the Schematic Plan. In addition, the applicant is also seeking amendments to the PUD Guidelines to update residential development standards applicable to the proposed alley-style infill residential lot development. Specifically, Section IV of the Natomas Crossing PUD Guidelines sets the design guidelines within the PUD with Subsection C “Site Specific Design Criteria” establishing specific development standards for a variety of housing types within the PUD. The applicant is requesting an amendment to Section IV, Subsection C “Site Specific Design Criteria” to include development standards that are reflective of the proposed project design. This includes:
• Provisions to allow garage forward design on alley loaded residential lots. • Provisions to exempt new alley-loaded single unit dwelling subdivisions from Bulk Control requirements.

A full description of changes can be found in Attachment 10, Exhibit B.

Staff is supportive of the requested schematic plan amendment as the base Single-Unit Dwelling or Duplex (R-1A) zone allows residential development and the site is surrounded by medium density single-unit dwelling residential development as depicted in the schematic plan. Furthermore, the design configuration of the proposed development would not impede the neighborhood character of the existing community in that driveways, garages, and onsite parking are located away from the public right of way. The proposed development uses pop out elements, variation in materials, and adequate site orientation to positively address scale and massing. Staff worked with the applicant on many iterations of the text language to ensure thoughtful and appropriate development standards and signage criteria for the site, not just for potential tenants but also in consideration of the nearby development and urban context.

Tentative Subdivision Map
The project proposes to subdivide one 2.03-acre parcel into 32 residential lots, and eight additional lots for private streets, landscape areas, and pedestrian access. The proposed residential lots range in size from 1,716 square feet to 2,025 square feet. The overall density is 16 dwelling units per net acre (du/na), consistent with the permitted minimum density of the General Plan Map LUP-8. The project is being reviewed pursuant to the Missing Middle Housing (MMH) Interim Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2024-0027) due to the development proposal including single-unit dwellings on lots between 1,200 square feet and 2,899 square feet. The MMH Interim Ordinance has prescriptive development standards for lot size, width, and depth applicable to the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map.

Table 3: Applicable Development Standards (MMHO, Ord. 2024-0027) Standard Required Provided Deviation?
Lot Size Min. 1,200 SF 1,716 – 2,025 SF No
Lot Width Min. 16’ Interior 30.5’ – 45’ No
Lot Depth Max. 160’ 56’ – 64’ No
As shown in Table 3, the proposed lots are consistent with the requirements of the MMH Interim Ordinance, and no deviations are requested. On November 5, 2025, the Subdivision Review Committee (SRC) reviewed the proposed map and recommended approval to the Planning and Design Commission based on the conditions of approval attached to this report.

Site Plan and Design Review
Site Plan and Design Review is required for the project to ensure compliance with applicable development standards and design guidelines as they apply to residential developments in the R-1A zone, MMH Interim Ordinance, Natomas Crossing Area 2 PUD, and Citywide Single-Unit and Duplex Dwelling Design Guidelines. All standards that are not listed in the Missing Middle Housing Interim Ordinance are regulated by the PUD Guidelines and the R-1A zone in the Planning and Development Code (Title 17). Table 4 below illustrates project compliance with applicable development standards for single-unit dwellings including height and setback requirements, and no deviations are requested.

Table 4: Applicable Development Standards (MMHO, Ord. 2024-0027) Standard Required Provided Deviation?
Height Max. 35’ 26’ N
Front Setback
(Tanzanite Avenue – Lots 20, 24, 25, 32) Min 12.5’ 12.5’ – 13.5’ N Private Alley Setback N/A 6’ – 12.8’ N
Interior Side Setback
(Lots 1-6; 8-13; 15-32)
Min. 0’ 0.5’ – 7.75’ N
Interior Side Setback
(Lots 7 and 14)
Min 3’ 6.5 – 8.5 N
Rear Setback Min. 4’ 10’ – 12’ N
Site Access, Circulation and Parking
The site is currently bound by two public roadways, Airport Road at the west and Tanzanite Avenue at the south. The subject site is adjacent to the future multi-use path along Airport Road. The project provides pedestrian connectivity to the planned bike/ped path, further promoting walkability and ease of access. Access to the residential lots would be provided via a new private roadway (Lot G). Additionally, a 20-foot private alley is proposed off of Tanzanite Avenue to provide access to four of the lots and serve as an EVA to the subdivision.

Parking for this site is located away from the public roadway with guest spaces located at the interior of the site and screened from public view by the buildings. Via parking is provided through 32 attached, two car garages and 12 open (unassigned) parking spaces, the project will have 76 vehicle spaces, providing sufficient parking for both residents and guests. This project is not required to comply with the City’s requirements for parking lot shading, which require that after 15 years, 50% of the parking lot, where vehicles will maneuver and park, is shaded by tree canopy. Pursuant to Sacramento City Code section 17.612.040, single unit and duplex dwelling parking areas are exempt from the tree shading requirement.

House Designs and Architectural Analysis
The applicant is proposing to construct a 32-unit detached single-unit subdivision and associated site improvements on the 2.03-acre site. The project proposes two floor plans, each with three elevations and three-color themes for a total of nine styles. The project is conditioned to provide enhanced elevations (Plan 1X and Plan 2X) along Tanzanite Avenue. The façade incorporates planar changes and additional exterior materials to positively engage the street. Each floor plan layout has a kitchen, dining area and living space, and a half bathroom downstairs, a 2-car garage at the front, and the bedrooms and two bathrooms located at the second level. There are two different house plans, each with different façade designs that vary by exterior materials, colors, and design elements such as roofing pitch, roofing material, window framing and accents, and porch decoration.

Table 5: Proposed House Plans
Plan Square Footage Bedrooms/Bathrooms Stories Design
Schemes
Color
Schemes
1 1,472 3/2.5 2 3 3
1X 1,495 3/2.5 2 1 3
2 1,627 3/2.5 2 3 3
2X 1,658 3/2.5 2 1 3
Homes are oriented toward the proposed internal private street and alley. The dwellings along Tanzanite Avenue are oriented toward the internal private driveway, with pop out elements and materials changes providing activation along the public roadway. Site landscaping includes enhanced tree coverage along Tanzanite Avenue including trees, shrubs and grass. The proposed landscaping is designed to improve the aesthetic appearance of public and common spaces connected to the development.

The exterior finishes of the homes consist of smooth stucco, horizontal lap siding and board and batten siding, dimensional composition shingle roofing, decorative window trim, decorative front entry doors and accent stone veneer elements on the porch columns. The homes are designed to bring architecture forward of the garage doors with porches, deep recesses, and roof eaves to provide deep shadows and to minimize their impact on building façades. The color palette for the project is generally earth-toned and neutral, with warm-toned accents. The architecture of the homes is inspired by a contemporary approach while complementing the surrounding neighborhood.

Figure 4: Interior Streetscape
Figure 5: Streetscape – Tanzanite Avenue
Natomas Crossing PUD
PUDs are development guided by a total design plan in which one or more of the zoning regulations, other than use regulations, may be waived or varied to allow flexibility and creativity in site and building design and location. SCC chapter 17.452 establishes general criteria for the adoption of PUDs, including requirements that PUDs establish a schematic plan and development guidelines. A property located within a PUD is subject to the requirements of the schematic plan and development guidelines adopted for the PUD in addition to the underlying zone of the property. The schematic plan and development guidelines for a PUD may modify the underlying zoning regulations to establish specific design standards (e.g., setback requirements, height limits, etc.), sign programs, density standards; however, uses are determined by the underlying zone.

The Natomas Crossing PUD Guidelines include a number of design standards applicable to the project site as follows:
• Residential Architecture: Variation in building facades should be achieved, in part, by using a variety of materials along each street, including, but not limited to, stucco, wood siding, stone and brick. Street elevations should be broken with porches, reveals, recesses, trim elements and other architectural features to provide visual interest.
• Driveways and Garages: Driveway widths will be minimized where ever possible. The goal in controlling the garage placement is to reduce the visual impact of the auto and to allow the “human scale elements of the building to dominate the street.
• Circulation and Parking: Pedestrian walkways that connect residential neighborhoods to the surrounding community are encouraged. Surface parking lots for medium and high density units shall be located away from the adjacent roadways, to the rear of the buildings.

Staff has confirmed that the project has implemented all of the above design standards consistent with the Natomas Crossing PUD Guidelines. The project design incorporates elements of the surrounding environment, including stone veneer and stucco with push/pull elements, roof eaves and porches. Additionally, parking for this site is located away from the public roadway with spaces located at the interior of the site and screened from public view by the buildings.

Design Guidelines
The purpose of the Citywide Single-Unit Dwelling and Duplex Dwelling Design Guidelines is to encourage consistent design while allowing for variety, innovation, and for residential structures which will improve the character of neighborhoods by making them more attractive and inviting places to live while maintaining visual interest and a sense of place.

The design of the homes is consistent with the Citywide Single-Unit Dwelling and Duplex Dwelling Design Guidelines as the proposed house plans:
• Incorporate porches which encourage a sense of community and attractively identify entry features;
• Roofing is designed to extend beyond garage doors which minimizes their visual impact;
• A variety of exterior materials, colors and design elements are included providing visual interest; and
• HVAC units are conditioned to be ground-mounted and screened from street and pedestrian views.
• Offer unique massing and layouts while incorporating complementary design elements and setbacks to establish a harmonious streetscape.

Demolition Review
SCC section 17.108.090 defines “demolition” of any structure 50 years older or older as either the complete demolition of the structures or the partial demolition of the structure that would remove an aggerate of 50 or more linear feet of exterior wall or more than 50% of the building’s footprint. As proposed, the project would require the complete demolition of an existing ±1,740 square foot detached single-unit dwelling constructed circa 1946 and several accessory structures. The 80-year-old single-unit dwelling is not currently listed on the California Register of Historic Places (CRHR) or as a landmark on the Sacramento Register of Historic and Cultural Resources (Sacramento Register). The demolition of this building was reviewed by the Preservation Director who determined that the building is not a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA and ineligible for listing on the Sacramento Register. As such, the Preservation Director does not oppose demolition of the structure on historical or environmental grounds.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
February 24, 2026
ADOPTING THE MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY/15183 CHECKLIST FOR THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD PROJECT (P25-010) (APN: 225-0150-055-0000) Background
A. On January 22, 2026, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Enclave at Airport Road project (P25-010) and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council.

B. On February 24, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010.A.2.b.i. and received and considered evidence concerning the Enclave at Airport project (P25-010).

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds as follows:

A. Based on the determination and recommendation of the City’s Environmental Planning Services Manager and the oral and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the project, the City Council finds that the project is exempt from review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) as follows:

1. Pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the project is consistent with the use and density established under the existing 2040 General Plan for which the City has certified a Master EIR.

2. The Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, provided for in the CEQA Guidelines, concluded that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts that: (1) were peculiar to the project or the project site; (2) were not identified as a significant effect in the Master EIR; (3) were potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the Master MEIR; or (4) were previously identified significant effects, and which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the Master EIR was certified, were determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the Master EIR.

3. Based upon Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist identifies the 2040 General Plan policies and/or actions that apply to the development of the project and have been determined in the Master EIR to substantially mitigate environmental effects. To the extent that the 2040 General Plan policies and/or actions substantially mitigate a particular project impact, the impact shall not be considered peculiar, pursuant to Section 15183(f) of the CEQA Guidelines, thus, eliminating the requirement for further environmental review.

Section 2.

The City Council directs that, upon approval of the Project, the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a Notice of Exemption with the Sacramento County Clerk and with the State Office of Planning and Research, pursuant to section 21152(a) of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines adopted pursuant thereto.

Section 3.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 915 I Street, Sacramento, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City Council.

Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ORDINANCE NO. 2026 –
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
February 24, 2026

AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT FOR THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD PROJECT (P25-010) ON

PROPERTY LOCATED IN NORTH NATOMAS
APN: 225-0150-055-0000; 3600 AIRPORT ROAD
BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO:

Section 1.

This Ordinance incorporates, and by this reference makes part hereof, that certain Development Agreement, by and between the City of Sacramento and Next Generation Capital, LLC (the “landowner”), a copy of which is attached.

Section 2.

The City Council enacts this ordinance against the following background:

A. The agreement is consistent with the city general plan and the goals, policies, standards and objectives of the North Natomas Community Plan (NNCP).

B. The project should be encouraged in order to meet important economic, social, environmental or planning goals of the NNCP.

C. The project would be unlikely to proceed in the manner proposed in the absence of a Development Agreement.

D. The landowner will incur substantial costs in order to provide public improvements, facilities or services from which the general public will benefit.

E. The landowner will participate in all programs established and/or required under the general plan and the NNCP and all of its approving resolutions (including any mitigation monitoring plan), and has agreed to financial participation required under any applicable financing plan and its implementation measures, all of which will accrue to the benefit of the public.

F. The form of the development agreement is as specified in Ordinance No. 95-012.

G. The local flood management agency has made adequate progress (as defined in California Government Code section 65007) on the construction of a flood protection system that will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban or urbanizing areas or the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection in nonurbanized areas for property located within a flood hazard zone, intended to be protected by the system.

Section 3.

The attached Development Agreement is hereby approved, and the Mayor is authorized to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City of Sacramento after the effective date of this Ordinance. This approval and authorization is based upon the California Environmental Quality Act Addendum which is the subject of a separate resolution adopted by City Council prior to or concurrent with the adoption of this Ordinance.

Section 4.

Consistent with City Council Resolution 94-494, the Exhibits to the Development Agreement as they appear in Exhibit A to this Ordinance may be modified by City, in cooperation with Landowner, after City Council approval and execution by the Parties, and prior to recordation, of the Development Agreement, in order to conform to the final City Council approval of the Project.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A: Development Agreement
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

No Fee Required: Recording benefits the
City of Sacramento, a government entity.

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City Clerk
City of Sacramento
915 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY

NORTH NATOMAS

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
•• •
Enclave at Airport Road
P25-010
Next Generation Capital, LLC.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ ~ i ~
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

NORTH NATOMAS

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Table of Contents

RECITALS
A. Development Agreement/California Government Code
B. Property (Subject to Agreement)
C. City Council Actions
D. City/Landowner Objective
E. Landowners Commitment
F. Landowner’s Objective and Agreement
G. Procedural Ordinance for Development Agreement
H. Development Conditions and North Natomas Financing Plan I. North Natomas Land Acquisition Program
J. Agreement Voluntary
K. Agreement Authority
L. Procedural Requirements Completed
M. City Council Review and Approval
I. DEFINITIONS
II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT

1. Property Description and Binding Covenants

2. Interests of Landowner

3. Term

4. Assignment

5. Development of the Property
A. Permitted Uses and Development Standards
B. Discretionary Approvals
C. Development Timing
D. Special Conditions
~ ii ~ North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ E. Land Use and Development Regulations
(1) Regulations Applicable on Effective Date
(2) Future Changes in Regulations (Inconsistent)
(3) Future Changes in Regulations (Consistent)
(4) Mandated State or Federal Laws
(5) Effect on Agreement
(6) Health, Safety or Physical Risks
(7) Construction Standards and Permits
(8) City Modifications after Effective Date
F. City Review of Applications
G. Extension of Entitlements
H. Allocation Procedures

6. Fees, Charges, Assessments and Special Taxes
A. City Fees
B. Levies Imposed by Other Jurisdictions
C. Implementation of the North Natomas Finance Plan
D. Landowner’s Waivers

7. Reconfiguration of Parcels

8. Infrastructure
A. Construction by City
B. Construction by Landowner
C. Drainage Infrastructure
(1) Establishment of Financing Mechanisms
(2) Issuance of Bonds
(3) Linkage of Development to Completion of Drainage System D. Infrastructure Financing Proceedings
(1) Landowner Initiated Proceedings
(2) Proceedings Initiated by City
(3) Maintenance Districts
E. Reimbursement to Landowner
(1) From Financing Proceeds
(2) Reimbursement from Others Benefitted
(3) Reimbursement of Planning, Engineering and Staff Costs ~ iii ~ North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

9. Landowner Obligations
A. Transfer of Land to City
(1) Condition of Entitlements
(2) Request by City
B. Development Timing

10. Litigation/Indemnification
A. Challenge to Agreement or Entitlements
(1) City Discretion to Defend or Tender Defense
(2) Effect of Invalidation in Whole or Part
B. Indemnification

11. Effect of Subsequent Laws
A. Laws of Other Agencies
(1) New Laws by Other Agencies
(2) Termination of Agreement
(3) Landowner/City Right to Institute Litigation
B. Laws Passed by City

12. Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance

13. Legal Actions; Applicable Law; Attorney Fees
A. Legal Actions
B. Applicable Law
C. Attorney Fees

14. Amendment of Agreement

15. City’s Good Faith in Processing

16. Default, Remedies, Termination
A. General Provisions
(1) Landowner Default
(2) City Default
(3) Successors in Interest
B. Cure of Default
C. Remedies after Expiration of Cure Period
(1) Institution of Legal Proceedings
(2) Notice of Intent to Terminate Agreement
~ iv ~ North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

17. Annual Review
A. General Provisions
B. Scope of Review
C. Proceedings
D. Failure of Compliance

18. Termination upon Completion of Development
A. General Provisions
B. Multi-family and Single Family Residential Projects
C. Effect of Termination on Landowner Obligations

19. No Joint Venture, Partnership, or Other Relationship

20. Notices

21. Severability

22. Recording

23. Reimbursement to City

24. Provisions Relating to Lenders
A. Lender Rights and Obligations
B. Notice of Landowner’s Default Hereunder
C. Lender’s Right to Cure
D. Other Notices Given by City

25. Estoppel Certificate

26. Construction

27. Counterparts

28. Time

29. Limitation of Actions

30. No Third parties Benefitted

31. Effect of Agreement upon Title to Property

32. Covenant of Good Faith

33. Exhibits

34. Entire Agreement

35. City Attorney Costs
Execution Page for City and Landowner
Execution Page for Lender
~ v ~ North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit “A” Legal Description of Property
Exhibit “B” Landowner’s Development Plan
Exhibit “C” Special Conditions
Exhibit “D” Assignment and Assumption Agreement
Exhibit “E” North Natomas Land Acquisition Program
Exhibit “F” Protest Waiver Provisions Agreed to by Landowner Exhibit “G” Irrevocable Offer of Dedication Form
Exhibit “H” Map and Categorical Listing of Land and Infrastructure - 1 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY

AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO AND
NEXT GENERATION CAPITAL, LLC.

This Development Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 24th day of February, 202ϲ, by and between the CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter the “CITY”), and ϭ4ϲϵ EŵerŐŝŶŐ deĐh, LLC (hereinafter the “LANDOWNER”).

RECITALS
A. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risks of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted section 65864 et seq. of the Government Code which authorizes any city, county, or city and county to enter into a development agreement with an applicant for a development project, in order to establish certain rights and obligations of the parties relative to the Property.

B. LANDOWNER owns a legal or equitable interest in those certain parcels of real property (hereinafter the “Property”), described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are located within the CITY. The Property consists of lands designated as Assessor Parcels Nos. 225-0150-055-0000. LANDOWNER seeks to develop the Property consistent with CITY’s General Plan, the 1994 North Natomas Community Plan, and the Planning and Development Code (Sacramento City Code title 17) as they exist on the Effective Date.

C. On May 3, 1994, after making specific findings and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City Council approved the 1994 North Natomas Community Plan by adopting Resolution No. 94-259 (hereinafter the “NNCP”).

D. On February 27, 2024, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council (1) certified the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Sacramento 2040 General Plan by adopting Resolution No. 2024-0065; and (2) approved the 2040 General Plan, which includes the North Natomas Community Plan Area, by adopting Resolution No. 2024-0066 (hereinafter the “General Plan”). The uses allowed under the General Plan, the NNCP, and the applicable ordinances provide for a balanced mix of residential housing and employment opportunities as well as for the protection of major open-space and recreational resources.

E. CITY and LANDOWNER desire to enter into a development agreement pursuant to the provisions of Government Code section 65865 et seq. in order to provide for the orderly - 2 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ development of the Property, in accordance with the goals set forth in Government Code section 65865, the General Plan and the NNCP.

F. The coordinated and orderly development of the Property, and LANDOWNER’s commitment to the implementation of the North Natomas Finance Plan in order to assure the timely and properly-phased construction of all required Infrastructure and facilities, are essential to the proper implementation of the General Plan and the NNCP.

G. LANDOWNER desires to facilitate implementation of the General Plan, the NNCP and the North Natomas Finance Plan, and LANDOWNER therefore agrees to develop the Property in a manner consistent with the policies of the General Plan, the NNCP, the North Natomas Finance Plan and the Special Conditions, provided that LANDOWNER is assured that no subsequent changes in the General Plan, the NNCP, the North Natomas Finance Plan, the Zoning Ordinance or the Special Conditions shall apply to the Property during the term of this Agreement.

H. The City Council, on March 7, 1995, adopted the Procedural Ordinance, by which CITY will, inter alia, consider, adopt, amend and subsequently review the development agreements by and between CITY and a given landowner.

I. Development of the Property, in accordance with the conditions of this Development Agreement, will provide orderly growth and development of the Property in accordance with the requirements, policies, goals, standards, and objectives of the General Plan and the NNCP.

At the same time, it will assure that LANDOWNER is committed to funding its appropriate share of the cost of Infrastructure and other facilities which are the subject of the North Natomas Finance Plan, and that the funding for acquisition and construction of those facilities will be available to CITY as and when required under the Infrastructure phasing program.

J. An integral part of the North Natomas Finance Plan is the North Natomas Land Acquisition Program (“NNLAP”), with the associated Land Acquisition Fee (“LAF”). The NNLAP is designed to provide a means for transfer to or acquisition by CITY, or such other public agency as is appropriate, of certain lands within the NNCP area (as those lands are specified in the NNLAP) which are designated to be held publicly. Such lands are identified under the North Natomas Finance Plan. The purpose of the NNLAP is to provide a method whereby all of such lands will be transferred or acquired with funds from the private development community without cost to the CITY general fund, or any of its other funds, and at the time when needed. The purpose of the LAF is to provide a means, through the fee program, of equalizing the cost of the NNLAP among the various landowners within the NNCP area, inasmuch as certain landowners will be required to relinquish land to public ownership in amounts in excess of their fair share as defined by the North Natomas Financing Plan. The LAF also provides a means for reimbursing landowners who have advanced funds to CITY for the purpose of acquiring land required for Infrastructure, where eminent domain or other procedures are needed, or where it is otherwise - 3 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ required to enable a particular landowner to develop its property. One of the purposes of this Agreement is to provide LANDOWNER’s commitment to the provisions of the NNLAP and the LAF.

K. This Agreement is voluntarily entered into by LANDOWNER in order to assure the implementation of the General Plan, the NNCP and the North Natomas Finance Plan, and is made in consideration of the rights conferred and the procedures specified herein for the development of the Property. This Agreement is voluntarily entered into by CITY in the exercise of its legislative discretion in order to assure the implementation of the General Plan, the NNCP, and the North Natomas Finance Plan and in consideration of the agreements and undertakings of LANDOWNER hereunder. But for LANDOWNER’s contribution to and participation in programs to mitigate the impacts of the development of the Property and the cumulative impacts of development in the NNCP area, and to the implementation of the North Natomas Financing Plan, the CITY would not approve development of the Property.

L. The authority for this Agreement is contained in the City Charter of CITY, the Procedural Ordinance, other applicable CITY ordinances, resolutions and procedures and Government Code section 65864 et seq.

M. CITY and LANDOWNER have taken all actions mandated by and have fulfilled all requirements set forth in the Procedural Ordinance for the adoption of this Agreement by the City Council.

N. The City Council has reviewed and approved this Agreement. It finds that this Agreement is consistent with the General Plan, the NNCP, the North Natomas Finance Plan, and all other applicable CITY ordinances, rules and regulations. The implementation of this Agreement is in the best interest of CITY and the health, safety and welfare of its residents. The environmental impacts of the development contemplated herein were adequately considered in the environmental documentation prepared by CITY and adoption of the ordinance and approval of this Agreement complies in all respects with the California Environmental Quality Act.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in further consideration of the above recitals, all of which are expressly incorporated into this Agreement, and the mutual promises and covenants of the parties contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

I. DEFINITIONS
The terms set forth below, unless the context otherwise requires, shall have the meanings prescribed, for purposes of this Agreement.
- 4 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • Adopting Ordinance: the ordinance pursuant to which the City Council approves this Agreement. • Allocation Procedures: those procedures set forth in section 5.H. of this Agreement, whereunder the various uses and densities are distributed to and among the various parcels, or portions of them, comprising the Property.
• Annual Review: the process, and procedures therefor, whereby CITY reviews, pursuant to Government Code section 65865.1, the nature and extent of compliance by LANDOWNER with all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which process and procedures are as specified in the Procedural Ordinance, and in section 17 of this Agreement. • Assessment: a special assessment levied on real property within the North Natomas Community Plan area, for the purpose of financing Infrastructure and/or public facilities, or maintenance thereof, in accordance with the California Streets and Highways Code, the California Government Code, and/or the Sacramento City Code.
• Assessment District Policy Manual: the document entitled “City of Sacramento Policy and Procedures for Use of Special Assessment and Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Financing for Infrastructure and Public Facilities,” as adopted by the City Council on June 29, 1993 (Resolution 93-381), as said document may be amended from time to time. • Assignee: a third Person executing an Assumption Agreement prepared in accordance with the format prescribed in Exhibit D.
• Assignment: the sale or other transfer by LANDOWNER of all or part of its right, title and interest in the Property and in this Agreement to another Person, in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
• Assumption Agreement: the agreement prescribed in Exhibit D, whereby an Assignee undertakes to perform all obligations, and other terms and conditions of this Agreement, as a condition of release of the Assignee’s predecessor in interest from the responsibility for performance of such obligations and other terms and conditions, with respect to the portion of the Property assigned to the Assignee.
• CEQA: the California Environmental Quality Act, set forth at California Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq., as amended from time to time.
• CITY: the City of Sacramento.
- 5 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • City Agency: the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento, and the Housing Agency of the City of Sacramento.
• City Council: the Council of the City of Sacramento.
• Comprehensive Drainage Plan: the Drainage System for North Natomas, prepared by the City of Sacramento, Borcalli & Associates, Ensign & Buckley, or other consulting firm, and adopted by the City Council, as it may be amended from time to time.
• Comprehensive Flood Management Plan: that plan required to be prepared, and to be adopted by the City Council, pursuant to the CITY’s floodplain policy adopted by Resolution No. 93-696. • Dedication: the transfer of real property, or a defined interest therein, to CITY or another public agency, free of all encumbrances and other matters affecting the title except as may otherwise be agreed to by CITY or such other public agency, and at no cost to CITY or such other public agency, as specifically set forth in the NNLAP, within the North Natomas Finance Plan, as it may exist from time to time.
• Deed of Trust: a real property security device whereby the debtor (trustor) conveys title to real property to a trustee as security for a debt owed to the creditor (beneficiary). • Default: a failure of performance, or unreasonable delay in performance, by either party to this Agreement, of any of its terms, conditions, obligations or covenants. Default shall include, but not be limited to failure to comply with all provisions of the North Natomas Finance Plan and/or failure to pay any fee, tax or assessment enacted pursuant to that Plan. • Development: the use(s) to which the Property will be put, the buildings and improvements to be constructed on it, and the construction activities incident thereto, together with the process of obtaining all required land use entitlements.
• Development Agreement: this Agreement.
• Development Plan: LANDOWNER’s plan for development of the Property, as set forth in Exhibit B.

Where LANDOWNER, at the time of execution of this Agreement, does not propose a specific development project, the Development Plan shall be deemed to be development consistent with the Land Use and Development Regulations.
• Drainage Phasing Plan: that portion of the Comprehensive Drainage Plan which identifies the sequence of construction of the Drainage System.
- 6 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • Drainage System: that drainage system set forth in the Comprehensive Drainage Plan, as that plan may exist from time to time.
• Drainage Sub-basin: the individual drainage sub-areas identified in the Comprehensive Drainage Plan.
• Effective Date: the date on which this Agreement has been approved by the City Council. • General Plan: the General Plan of the City of Sacramento, as adopted by the City Council on February 27, 2024, as said plan may be amended from time to time. • Habitat Conservation Plan: that plan, which must be adopted and implemented by the City Council, pursuant to which measures are taken to implement the provisions of the federal and state Endangered Species Acts, and pursuant to which incidental take permits will be issued to the City of Sacramento, to Landowner, or to others under said Acts. • Infrastructure: all public facilities and improvements needed to serve urban development, as identified in the NNCP and the North Natomas Finance Plan, or in subdivision maps, parcel maps, or as may otherwise be constructed and conveyed to CITY or another public agency, including but not limited to street and freeway improvements, drainage improvements, sanitary sewer improvements and water storage and transmission facilities. • Interim Drainage: temporary surface water drainage to be provided to the North Natomas area by RD-1000, and/or any phase of the Drainage System, and/or any drainage project resulting in the removal of land within the North Natomas Finance Plan Area from a 100-year floodplain, pursuant to a plan approved by that agency and the City Council for the initial phase of development within North Natomas, until such time as the Drainage System is constructed and operational, all pursuant to the RD-1000 Agreement.
• Irrevocable Offer of Dedication: an unconditional and irrevocable offer by LANDOWNER to transfer real property to CITY in accordance with the provisions of the NNLAP and/or any condition of any land use entitlement applicable to the Property, in the form specified in Exhibit G.
• Land Acquisition Program (NNLAP): the plan, also called the North Natomas Land Acquisition Program, which as an integral part of the North Natomas Finance Plan, is designed to provide a means for transfer to or acquisition by CITY, or such other public agency as is appropriate, of all lands within the North Natomas Community Plan area which are designated to be held publicly, at no cost to CITY. A copy of the plan is attached hereto as Exhibit E and incorporated herein by this reference.
- 7 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • Land Acquisition Fee (LAF): the fee/reimbursement program, which is an integral part of the North Natomas Finance Plan, and which is designed to equalize the cost of the NNLAP among the various landowners within the North Natomas Finance Plan area. • Land Use and Development Regulations: the General Plan, the North Natomas Community Plan, the CITY’s Subdivision Map Act Ordinance, and Zoning Ordinances, together with any other CITY ordinance, or resolutions, rules, regulations and official policies as they exist on the Effective Date, which govern or regulate land use and/or development in the North Natomas Community Plan area.
• Lender: a Person (or a successor in interest to such person) who has advanced funds to, or who is otherwise owed money by a debtor, where the obligation is embodied in a promissory note or other evidence of indebtedness, and where such note or other evidence of indebtedness is secured by a Mortgage or Deed of Trust.
• Mortgage: a contract by which the mortgagor (debtor) as owner hypothecates or pledges real property, or otherwise grants a security interest therein to a Lender (mortgagee), to secure performance under a promissory note or other evidence of indebtedness, and where the holder of the mortgage is granted a power of sale.
• North Natomas Community Plan (NNCP): the Community Plan for development of the North Natomas area, as adopted by the City Council on May 3, 1994, as said plan exists on the Effective Date. The NNCP includes, without limitation, a Land Use Diagram and Policy Statements. • North Natomas Finance Plan: the plan, as it may be amended from time to time, which establishes methods for financing required Infrastructure and public facilities through a combination of land transfers, dedications, contributions, fees, assessment districts, community facilities districts, and other measures.
• North Natomas Finance Plan Area: the lands within the area covered by the North Natomas Finance Plan, and which are obligated thereby, as that area may exist from time to time. • Parties: the City of Sacramento and LANDOWNER.
• Person: any person, firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, corporation or company.
• Planning and Development Code: the Planning and Development Code of the City of Sacramento, as that Code exists on the Effective Date.
- 8 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • Procedural Ordinance: Ordinance No. 95-012, adopted by the City Council on March 7, 1995, and which sets forth procedures for execution, approval, implementation, amendment, and related matters, with respect to development agreements for lands within the NNCP area. • Project: part or all of the elements set forth in LANDOWNER’s Development Plan. • Project Review: CITY’s actions in reviewing any project proposed by LANDOWNER with respect to the Property, including but not limited to review of all required land use entitlement applications. • Property: the real property owned by LANDOWNER, as set forth in Exhibit A. • Protest Waiver: the agreement set forth in Exhibit F, executed by LANDOWNER pursuant to this Agreement, or in connection with the conditions of any required entitlement. • Purchaser: an assignee.
• Reconfiguration: the reconfiguration, adjustment or alteration of property lines through parcel or subdivision mapping, or lot line adjustment.
• RD-1000 Agreement: any agreement which governs the terms and conditions under which Interim Drainage, if applicable, will be provided to the Property. • Reimbursement: the reimbursement of monies to a Person who has advanced funds for Infrastructure required for development of the Property, or who has advanced funding for Infrastructure or other improvements which are required by the NNCP, the North Natomas Finance Plan, or other document, and which have benefit to land beyond the Property, in accordance with a reimbursement agreement approved by CITY. Any such agreement will be limited to the portion of the funding advanced which is in excess of the allocable share of the cost of the Infrastructure or improvement attributable to the Property. • Reimbursable Infrastructure Costs: those costs paid by LANDOWNER, and which are identified as reimbursable pursuant to CITY’s Assessment District Policy Manual (as defined in section 8.D.(1) of this Agreement).
• Special Conditions: those conditions, terms and requirements specified in Exhibit C. • Special Permit: any discretionary permit required pursuant to the Land Use and Development Regulations, and issued by CITY for development of the Property, upon proper application therefor by LANDOWNER.
- 9 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ • Term: the length of this Agreement in terms of time, as specified in section 3, or as that time may be extended pursuant to any applicable provision of this Agreement. • Transfer: an assignment.
• Transferee: an assignee.
• Zoning: the division of the City of Sacramento into districts, and the application of zoning regulations thereto, which include (without limitation) regulation of the height or bulk of buildings (structural and architectural design) and the use to which the land and buildings within prescribed districts may be put, all as specified in the Zoning Ordinance.

II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT

1. Property Description and Binding Covenants. The Property is that certain real property owned by LANDOWNER and described in Exhibit “A.” The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, the parties and, subject to section 4 below, to their successors-in-interest.

2. Interests of Landowner. LANDOWNER represents that LANDOWNER owns a legal or equitable interest in the Property and that all other Persons holding legal or equitable interests in the Property, including the Lender), have executed and are bound by this Agreement.

3. Term.

A. Initial Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall extend for a period of fifteen (15) years thereafter, unless it is sooner terminated or modified by the mutual consent of the parties.

B. Renewal Options. Subject to the provisions of this subsection, LANDOWNER shall have the right to renew this Agreement on its same terms and conditions, taking into account any amendments hereto mutually agreed upon after the Effective Date. The term of this Agreement shall mean and include the initial term, plus any renewal periods. The specific conditions for exercise of the renewal options are as follows:
(1) On the Exercise Date, LANDOWNER shall not be in default in any material respect under this Agreement, including any amendments hereto. For purposes of this subsection, “Exercise Date” shall mean the date that LANDOWNER or LANDOWNER’s successor in interest gives written notice of intention to exercise the - 10 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ option to renew this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of section 20 hereof.
(2) The option to renew shall be exercisable by giving CITY written notice of LANDOWNER’s intention to exercise the option on or before the Exercise Date, which notice shall be given not later than one hundred eighty (180) days prior to expiration of the initial term or any renewal term.
(3) LANDOWNER shall be limited to three (3) renewal periods of five (5) years each; the parties specifically intend that under no circumstances shall the term of this Agreement extend beyond thirty (30) years, unless this Agreement is amended in accordance with the procedures set forth herein for Agreement amendments.

4. Assignment. LANDOWNER shall have the right to sell, assign, or transfer its interests under this Agreement as part of a contemporaneous and related sale, assignment or transfer of its interests in the Property, or any portion thereof, without the consent of CITY; provided, however, that LANDOWNER shall notify CITY of such sale, assignment or transfer by providing written notice thereof to CITY in the manner provided in this Agreement. LANDOWNER shall remain obligated to perform all terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such purchaser, assignee or transferee, to the satisfaction of and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, executes and delivers to CITY an express agreement to assume all of the obligations and other terms and conditions of this Agreement with respect to the Property or such portion thereof sold, assigned or transferred. The execution of such an assumption agreement shall relieve LANDOWNER of the obligations expressly assumed only if (a) LANDOWNER is not in default under this Agreement at the time of the assignment or transfer; and (b) LANDOWNER has provided CITY with notice of said assignment or transfer in the manner provided hereunder.

Any such assumption agreement with respect to LANDOWNER’s obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be to the satisfaction of the City Attorney if executed in the form of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference, or such other form as shall be proposed by LANDOWNER and approved by the City Attorney prior to the effective date of the assignment.

Any purchaser, assignee, or transferee shall be obligated and bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall be the beneficiary thereof and a party thereto, only with respect to the Property, or such portion thereof, sold, assigned, or transferred to it. Any such purchaser, assignee, or transferee shall observe and fully perform all of the duties and obligations of LANDOWNER under this Agreement, as such duties and obligations pertain to the portion of the Property sold, assigned, or transferred. - 11 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

5. Development of the Property.

A. Permitted Uses and Development Standards. Subject to the Special Conditions set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (herein the “Special Conditions”), any reserved discretionary approvals specified in this Agreement, and all other terms and conditions of this Agreement, LANDOWNER may develop the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Land Use and Development Regulations in effect on the Effective Date, or, where applicable, the Development Plan, as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Specifically, the permitted uses, density or intensity of use, height or size of buildings and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes shall be as set forth in the Development Plan.

B. Discretional Approvals.
(1) Project Review. Development of the Property is subject to all required discretionary approvals. In reviewing and approving applications for special permits and other discretionary approvals, CITY may exercise Project Review and may attach such conditions and requirements as are consistent with the policies, goals, standards and objectives of the General Plan, the NNCP and the North Natomas Finance Plan, and as may be necessary to comply with all applicable legal requirements and policies of CITY pertaining to such reserved discretionary approvals. (2) Rezoning of the Property. Upon proper and complete application by LANDOWNER, CITY agrees to rezone the Property in accordance with the provisions of the NNCP in effect on the Effective Date.

C. Development Timing. This Agreement contains no requirement that LANDOWNER must initiate or complete development of any phase of the development of the Property or any portion thereof within any period of time set by CITY. It is the intention of this provision that LANDOWNER be able to develop the Property in accordance with LANDOWNER’s own schedule; provided, however, that to the extent that phasing is required by the NNCP, or by the Special Conditions, such provisions shall govern. No future modification of the Sacramento City Code or any ordinance or regulation which limits the rate of development over time shall be applicable to the Property. However, nothing herein shall be construed to relieve LANDOWNER from any time conditions in any permit or subdivision map approval or to excuse the timely completion of any act which is required to be completed within a time period set by any applicable code or permit provisions.

D. Special Conditions. Development of the Property shall be subject to the Special Conditions, as specified in Exhibit C.
- 12 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ E. Land Use and Development Regulations.
(1) Subject to the Special Conditions specified in Exhibit C, development of the Property shall be subject to the Land Use and Development Regulations applicable to such development on the Effective Date.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, to the extent any future changes in Land Use and Development Regulations adopted by CITY purport to be applicable to the Property but are inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including subsection 5E(1) above, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail, unless the parties or their successors in interest mutually agree to amend or modify this Agreement in accordance with the provisions for modification hereinafter set forth.
(3) To the extent that any future changes in the Land Use and Development Regulations adopted by CITY are applicable to the Property and are not inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or are otherwise made applicable by other provisions of this Agreement, such future changes shall be applicable to the Property.
(4) Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the application to development of the Property of changes in the Land Use and Development Regulations, the terms of which are specifically mandated by changes in state or federal laws or regulations.

In the event state or federal laws or regulations enacted after the effective date of this Agreement or action by any governmental jurisdiction other than CITY prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement or require changes in permits, maps or plans approved hereunder by CITY, this Agreement shall be modified, extended or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such state or federal laws or regulations or the regulations of such other governmental jurisdiction.
(5) To the extent that any actions of federal or state agencies (or actions of regional and local agencies, including CITY, required by federal or state agencies or actions of CITY taken in good faith in order to prevent adverse impacts upon CITY by state or federal actions) have the effect of preventing, delaying or modifying development of the NNCP area or any area therein, CITY shall not in any manner be liable for such prevention, delay or modification of said development. Such actions may include, but are not limited to, flood plain or wetlands designations and actions of CITY or regional agencies as a result thereof and the imposition of air quality measures or sanctions and actions of CITY or regional and local agencies as a result - 13 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ thereof. In such a situation, CITY’s actions shall not be arbitrary or capricious, and the parties shall meet and endeavor to achieve solutions which preserve the integrity of the NNCP, while to the extent feasible allow development of the Property in the manner contemplated by this Agreement.
(6) Nothing herein shall be construed to limit the authority of CITY to enact amendments to the Land Use and Development Regulations, or enact other ordinances or resolutions, which have the legal effect of protecting persons or property from conditions which create a health, safety or physical risk. (7) Building codes, ordinances and regulations relating to construction standards or permits shall apply as of the time of grant of each applicable construction permit. (8) No modification of CITY’s ordinances, resolutions, policies, rules or regulations adopted after the Effective Date, which purport to limit the rate of development over time or to govern the sequence of development of land within the NNCP area, shall apply to the Property. The provisions of this subsection apply to modifications adopted or imposed by the City Council, or through the initiative or referendum process; provided, however, nothing in this subsection shall limit the ability of CITY to act in accordance with the provisions of subsections 5E(4), 5E(5) and 5E(6) of this Agreement.

F. CITY Review of Applications. Consistent with the standards set forth in section 15 of this Agreement, nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude CITY from its right and responsibility to review applications for entitlements submitted by LANDOWNER in accordance with its normal and usual procedures and practices, as they may exist at the time the application is accepted as complete, or is otherwise deemed complete by operation of law.

G. Extension of Entitlements. Pursuant to Government Code section 66452.6 all vesting tentative subdivision maps, master parcel tentative maps, parcel maps, subdivision tentative maps, planned unit development permits, special permits, or any other maps, rezonings or land use entitlements of potentially limited duration previously, contemporaneously or subsequently approved for the Property subject to this Development Agreement, shall be valid for a minimum term equal to the full term of this Agreement (including the initial term, and any renewal period resulting from exercise by LANDOWNER of the options provided for in section 3 hereof), or for a period of thirty-six (36) months, whichever is longer, but in no event for a shorter period than the maximum period of time permitted by the Subdivision Map Act or Government Code for such land use entitlements. The provisions of section 25 of this Agreement relating to estoppel certificates shall apply to any request made by LANDOWNER to CITY with respect to the life of any entitlement covered by this subsection. Nothing in this section shall be construed to, or operate to extend the term of this Agreement. - 14 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ H. Allocation Procedures for Building Square Footage. Procedures for allocating the uses or densities approved for the Property among the various parcels and/or portions thereof, and for resolution of any disputes regarding such allocations, shall be as follows:
(1) Allocation. Unless otherwise identified in the Development Plan, which is attached as Exhibit B to this Agreement, the allocation of building square footage shall be as identified in subsequent entitlements for the Property, including but not limited to parcel maps, subdivision maps, PUD schematic plans and development guidelines. The appropriate entitlement to address the allocation of building square footage shall be determined by City. Allocations for residential development shall be determined in the subdivision mapping process, unless CITY determines that some other method is appropriate under the circumstances.
(2) Dispute Resolution. Where a dispute exists between LANDOWNER, and/or any successor or successors in interest, with respect to any matter involving allocation of building square footage for or on the Property, such dispute shall be resolved by arbitration, utilizing the commercial arbitration procedures of the American Arbitration Association, or some other alternative dispute resolution procedure mutually agreed upon by the parties involved in the dispute. In no case shall CITY be a party to such dispute, or to the dispute resolution procedures. All of the provisions of this Agreement relating to indemnification and defense of CITY, and payment of CITY costs, shall apply to all disputes relating directly or indirectly to allocation.

6. Fees, Charges, Assessments and Taxes.

A. City Fees. All applications for CITY approvals, permits and entitlements shall be subject to the application fees, processing fees, mitigation fees and other development fees within the control of the CITY that are in force and effect as of the date that the application or other request for approval is filed.

B. Levies Imposed by Other Jurisdictions. LANDOWNER shall be responsible for:
(1) all fees, charges, assessments, special taxes or levies of any sort imposed by any other state or local agency, including but not limited to the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, in the future as a charge for mitigation measures imposed for the purpose of mitigation of environmental impacts associated with the provision of flood control improvements and measures for the NNCP area; - 15 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ (2) all fees, charges, assessments, special taxes or levies of any sort associated with the financing of the construction and implementation of said flood control improvements and measures;
(3) all special benefit assessments, special taxes or levies of any sort associated with construction of or maintenance of public improvements, where the Property is located within a district formed for that purpose by any agency other than CITY; (4) any fees or other charges required by RD-1000 to be paid to it in implementation of the RD-1000 Agreement; and
(5) ad valorem real estate taxes, and utility fees.

In the event that any of the fees, charges, assessments, special taxes or levies covered by this subsection B are imposed by or with the assistance of CITY, LANDOWNER shall nevertheless be responsible therefor. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit LANDOWNER’s right to protest, in accordance with applicable provisions of law: the formation of any district included within the provisions of this subsection or to protest the amount of any assessment levied by or on behalf of such district on the Property or any portion thereof; or to protest the nature and amount of any tax, fee, assessment or charge imposed pursuant to this subsection.

C. Implementation of the North Natomas Finance Plan. The North Natomas Finance Plan establishes a method for financing of required Infrastructure and public facilities through a combination of land transfers, dedications and contributions, fees, assessment districts, community facilities districts and other sources, so that the land within the North Natomas Finance Plan Area pays for its share of the cost of such Infrastructure and facilities. The plan also recognizes that there is a regional cost associated with certain portions of Infrastructure and facilities, and that that share will ultimately have to be paid from other sources, even though developers within the area, including LANDOWNER, acknowledge that they may have to participate in funding regional costs on a fair share basis. LANDOWNER shall participate in the North Natomas Finance Plan, as made applicable to the development of the Property, and shall faithfully and timely comply with each and every provision thereof, including but not limited to the NNLAP, the Land Acquisition Fee, assessments, special taxes, and other development fees and exactions set forth therein. Without limiting the foregoing, applications for special permits, subdivision maps or other land use entitlements and building permits may be made subject to LANDOWNER’s participation in and compliance with the plan. Failure to so participate shall be an event of default to which the default provisions of this Agreement and the Procedural Ordinance shall apply. For purposes of this Agreement “participate” - 16 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ and “participation” shall mean payment of all monies required by virtue of the North Natomas Finance Plan, and performance of all obligations imposed thereby.

D. LANDOWNER’s Waivers. LANDOWNER hereby agrees to the provisions of Exhibit F, which (without limitation) contains a comprehensive waiver of protest rights with respect to CITY’s establishment and implementation of development and impact fees; CITY’s actions in forming assessment districts and community facilities districts, and in levying assessments and taxes pursuant thereto; and CITY’s actions in implementing any provision of the North Natomas Finance Plan. As set forth in Exhibit F, LANDOWNER reserves the right to protest the actual amount of the fee, assessment or tax levy, or other CITY charge imposed on or allocated to the Property pursuant to the Finance Plan.

7. Reconfiguration of Parcels. LANDOWNER shall have the right to file applications with CITY for subdivision, lot line adjustment, or for master parcelization of all or part of the Property, for the purpose of reconfiguration of the Property. Such applications shall be processed and determined in accordance with the provisions of section 5, and all other applicable provisions of this Agreement. Where reconfiguration requires a Special Permit, or a P.U.D. designation, or other entitlement applicable to the Property or portion thereof which is subject to the application, CITY reserves the right to require such entitlements as a condition of granting the application.

8. Infrastructure.

A. Construction by CITY. To the extent that funds are available to CITY pursuant to the North Natomas Finance Plan, and to the extent that any required real property has been transferred to CITY pursuant to the NNLAP, or has been obtained by CITY through its power of eminent domain, which CITY agrees to utilize, where required, and subject to LANDOWNER’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all of the terms and conditions of any entitlement applicable to the Property, CITY agrees to use its best efforts to bring about the construction of the Infrastructure required to implement the Development Plan (Exhibit B). Provided, however, that CITY’s obligations hereunder shall be limited to those items of Infrastructure which, under the North Natomas Finance Plan, are to be constructed by CITY or under CITY’s direction and control; where Infrastructure is to be constructed by LANDOWNER, either pursuant to conditions of approval or otherwise, the provisions of this subsection shall not apply.

B. Construction by LANDOWNER. When required by conditions of approval, and in accordance with CITY specifications and standards in effect as of the date of construction, LANDOWNER shall diligently construct Infrastructure required for implementation of the Development Plan (Exhibit B). LANDOWNER shall further comply with all required - 17 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ funding requirements specified in the North Natomas Finance Plan, and the real property transfer provisions of the NNLAP.

C. Drainage Infrastructure. As of the Effective Date, it is contemplated that permanent drainage for the Property, and the entire North Natomas Finance Plan Area, will be provided by the Drainage System. It is further contemplated that Interim Drainage for the Property and the NNCP area will be provided pursuant to the RD-1000 Agreement or some other arrangement which has been implemented by CITY. Construction of the Drainage System will require land transfers to CITY pursuant to the NNLAP, or acquisition of required land by CITY through the use of eminent domain procedures, and funding for the required improvements, all on a timely basis and in accordance with the North Natomas Finance Plan, and subject to the provisions of the RD-1000 Agreement (or such other arrangement which has been implemented by CITY), together with the Drainage Sub-basin agreement, or substitute therefore, as specified in the Special Conditions. In recognition of the need for retention of flexibility and CITY discretion with respect to decisions relating to the ultimate solution to drainage for the NNCP area, and the need for unconditional provision of financing by LANDOWNER and other owners of land in the North Natomas Finance Plan Area through the mechanisms specified in the North Natomas Finance Plan, the parties agree as follows:
(1) Establishment of Financing Mechanisms. CITY shall, as soon as feasible following the adoption of the North Natomas Finance Plan by the City Council, establish public financing mechanisms as identified in the North Natomas Finance Plan, applicable to lands within the NNCP area which will benefit from the Drainage System.
(2) Issuance of Bonds. Decisions as to whether to issue bonds pursuant to such financing mechanisms, and the timing and manner of issuance thereof, shall be within the sole and exclusive discretion of CITY; provided, however, that CITY shall exercise its discretion in a good faith manner, so as to provide for timely construction of Infrastructure in order not to stop or slow development. (3) Linkage of Development to Completion of Drainage System. CITY has established a performance standard that requires (inter alia) that the Drainage System be completed and in operation no later than the point in time when building permits have been issued for fifty percent (50%) buildout of the North Natomas Finance Plan Area, as measured by developable acreage as defined in the North Natomas Finance Plan. In the event that a different phasing plan is adopted and implemented by CITY, LANDOWNER shall comply with all provisions of such a plan, and shall execute any agreement or other document, or participate in any mechanism as is required by CITY to implement such a plan.
- 18 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ D. Infrastructure Financing Proceedings.
(1) LANDOWNER-Initiated Proceedings. In the event that LANDOWNER desires to initiate proceedings for the formation of an assessment district, community facilities district, or other similar form of improvement financing mechanism to fund the construction of Infrastructure required by conditions of approval or otherwise, LANDOWNER shall file an application with CITY for that purpose in accordance with CITY’s Assessment District Policy Manual, as same may be amended from time to time, or such other policy document as may after the Effective Date be adopted by the City Council as a substitute therefor. CITY agrees to diligently process any such application, provided that such application:
(a) is complete and is accompanied by payment of CITY fees applicable on the date of filing of the application;
(b) otherwise complies with the Land Use and Development Regulations and applicable law, as it exists on the date of the application, including but not limited to the Assessment District Policy Manual;
(c) is consistent with CITY’s policies and procedures;
(d) provides for a value to lien ratio and other financial terms that are reasonably acceptable to CITY;
(e) provides for all funding requirements established by CITY for the purpose of payment of the costs of outside consultants needed, in CITY’s sole discretion; and
(f) provides that the specific consultants (e.g., bond counsel, financial advisors, underwriters, or other consultants as may be necessary under the circumstances) shall be selected by CITY in its sole discretion.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, CITY agrees that upon request made by LANDOWNER, CITY will consider making exceptions to the Assessment District Policy Manual, to allow for alternative methods of financing intract improvements, including but not limited to formation of assessment districts or similar financing mechanisms, where such alternatives are contemplated by the North Natomas Finance Plan, including any amendments thereto. Provided, however, that CITY reserves its discretion to condition use of any such alternatives on satisfaction of performance preconditions (including but not limited to drainage - 19 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ capacity), and to consider underwriting considerations and criteria, together with the manner in which such alternatives further the overall implementation of the North Natomas Finance Plan. Further, CITY may in its reasonable discretion deny any such request upon grounds, including but not limited to consistency of application of its policies and the potential for establishing negative precedent. (2) Proceedings Initiated by CITY. In the event that pursuant to the North Natomas Finance Plan, CITY in its discretion determines that a particular financing mechanism, including but not limited to an assessment district, a community facilities district, a fee district, a development fees procedure, or any similar mechanism, is required in order to implement the North Natomas Finance Plan, LANDOWNER’s participation obligations set forth hereunder (including but not limited to Exhibit C), in the North Natomas Finance Plan, or in any condition of approval, shall apply.
(3) Maintenance Districts. LANDOWNER may, following the procedures specified in subsection 8D(1) above, request that CITY establish one or more maintenance districts for the purpose of financing the maintenance of landscaping or other public improvements, whereunder lands benefitting from the improvements and their maintenance are assessed for a proportionate share of the maintenance cost.

E. Reimbursement to LANDOWNER.
(1) From Financing Proceeds. Subject to Chapter X of the North Natomas Finance Plan, where LANDOWNER has provided advance funding for public Infrastructure required by the North Natomas Finance Plan or has constructed such Infrastructure under the direction and control of CITY, LANDOWNER shall be reimbursed for Reimbursable Infrastructure Costs at such time as CITY has established a permanent financing mechanism in the form of an assessment district, community facilities district, or other similar mechanism through which permanent public financing for such improvements is established. Those items qualifying as Reimbursable Infrastructure Costs shall be determined pursuant to CITY policies in existence at the time of establishment of the permanent financing mechanism. CITY agrees to entertain reasonable requests from LANDOWNER for exceptions to such policies; provided, however, that CITY may, in its reasonable discretion, deny any such request upon grounds, including but not limited to consistency of application of its policies and the potential for establishing negative precedent. Nothing in this Agreement shall authorize reimbursement of any cost which, in the opinion of CITY’s bond counsel, is not permissible for purposes of establishing or retaining tax free status of any bonds issued, or contemplated to be issued by CITY. - 20 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No.______________________
City Agreement No.______________________ Date Adopted:______________________ (2) Reimbursement From Others Benefitted. In any case where CITY requires or permits LANDOWNER to plan, design, construct, or fund the planning, design or construction of improvements required for development by the North Natomas Finance Plan, in excess of or beyond those required for development of the Property, or, where required by the North Natomas Finance Plan, to make dedications, provide mitigation or incur costs in connection with public improvements or the planning of the North Natomas area in excess of or beyond those required for development of the Property, and the provisions of the preceding subsection do not apply, CITY shall utilize its best efforts to require that all other Persons benefitted by the improvements shall reimburse (through fee districts, agreements, conditions of approval, or otherwise) LANDOWNER for such Person’s proportionate share of such costs as determined in accordance with the North Natomas Finance Plan, or by CITY. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “in excess of or beyond those required for development of the Property” shall mean requirements which exceed LANDOWNER’s fair proportionate share, as determined in accordance with the provisions of the North Natomas Finance Plan and any associated documents or studies.

Such reimbursement shall be subject to the limitations specified in the preceding paragraph (including those provisions relating to consideration by CITY of exceptions to its policies), relating to CITY policy and Reimbursable Infrastructure Costs. Reimbursement shall be limited to that amount which exceeds LANDOWNER’s appropriate share of the cost, determined in accordance with principles established in the North Natomas Finance Plan, and any associated documents or studies.
(3) Reimbursement of Planning, Engineering and Staff Costs. In accordance with the provisions of the North Natomas Finance Plan, and as soon as feasible following City Council adoption of the said Plan, CITY shall enact a fee ordinance which imposes a fee upon NNCP area landowners, including LANDOWNER, to pay the planning, engineering, staff and related costs (including but not limited to CITY staff and related costs), as specified in the North Natomas Finance Plan, and which relate to development of the NNCP, the Finance Plan, the general form of the Development Agreement, the Comprehensive Drainage Plan, and all related documents. The fee shall be spread across lands within the NNCP area in the same fashion as the public facilities fees. Credits shall be given to those landowners who have paid some or all of their share of the said costs, for the amounts so paid. The fee shall be payable prior to issuance of the first discretionary entitlement for the land as to which an application has been filed with CITY.
- 21 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

9. LANDOWNER Obligations.

A. Transfer of Land to CITY. As set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, LANDOWNER has agreed to transfer lands needed for Infrastructure or public facilities to CITY, or to such other public agency as is appropriate, pursuant to the provisions of the NNLAP. Set forth in Exhibit H, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is a map depicting the currently contemplated approximate location and amount of land which LANDOWNER will be required to transfer to CITY, together with a categorical listing of the types of Infrastructure and public facilities which are covered by the terms of this subsection. LANDOWNER shall transfer the said required lands to CITY, utilizing the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication form set forth in Exhibit G, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, at such time as is:
(1) required pursuant to a condition or term of any entitlement for use or development of the Property; or
(2) requested by CITY, where LANDOWNER has not applied for an entitlement for use or development of the Property, but the land is needed, in CITY’s sole discretion, for purposes of construction of Infrastructure or public facilities.

In the event that, at the time of the required transfer to CITY, the location of, or the quantity of land required for the Infrastructure or public facilities has changed from that depicted on Exhibit H, to such a significant degree or extent that the location or quantity is inconsistent with both the NNCP as it exists on the effective date of this Agreement, and the North Natomas Finance Plan, the parties shall meet and negotiate, and in good faith endeavor to reach agreement on any amendments to this Agreement needed to allow development of the Property in a reasonable manner, taking into account the changes in Infrastructure and public facilities. If agreement is reached between the parties, the procedures specified herein and in the Procedural Ordinance shall apply to amendments to this Agreement. If agreement is not reached, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by providing the other party sixty (60) days notice.

B. Development Timing. LANDOWNER shall have no obligation to initiate or commence development of any particular phase of the Property within any period of time. - 22 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

10. Litigation/Indemnification.

A. Challenge to Agreement or Entitlements.
(1) In the event of any action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any portion of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the proceedings taken for its approval (including the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act –“CEQA”) or any other act undertaken by the parties hereto in furtherance of this Agreement or its terms, or any action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the entitlements specified herein (including CEQA challenges), the parties agree to cooperate in the defense of the action. In all such litigation brought to contest the validity of this Agreement or such entitlements, the following shall apply:
(a) City may, in its sole discretion, either defend such litigation or tender its defense to LANDOWNER.
(b) In the event that CITY determines to defend the action itself, LANDOWNER shall be entitled, subject to court approval, to join in or intervene in the action on its own behalf, or to advocate in favor of validity of this Agreement or any challenged entitlement. In such a case, each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs.
(c) In the event that CITY determines to tender the defense of the action to LANDOWNER, LANDOWNER shall defend the action on its behalf and on behalf of CITY, and shall bear all attorney fees and costs associated with such defense from and after the date of the tender. Provided, however, that CITY may at any time after the tender elect to assume representation of itself; in that event, from and after the date CITY gives notice of its election to do so, CITY shall be responsible for its own attorney fees and costs incurred thereafter.
(2) If, in such litigation, a final judgment or other final order is issued by the court which has the effect of invalidating or rendering ineffective, in whole or in part, any provision of this Agreement or the Agreement itself, or any entitlement issued during the term of this Agreement and pursuant to its terms, the following shall apply:
(a) if the judgment or order includes a provision for attorney fees and/or costs of the successful party or parties, LANDOWNER shall pay the entire cost thereof, without right of offset, contribution or indemnity from CITY, irrespective of - 23 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ anything to the contrary in the judgment or order. Provided, however, that if the litigation relates entirely, solely and exclusively to a challenge to the NNCP in general, or to the North Natomas Finance Plan in general, separate and apart from this Agreement or any entitlement relating to the Property, and if LANDOWNER is named or becomes a party in such litigation, LANDOWNER and CITY shall bear the cost of the successful party’s attorney fees and/or costs in the manner specified in the court’s judgment. (b) CITY and LANDOWNER shall meet and endeavor, in good faith, to attempt to reach agreement on any amendments needed to allow development of the Property to proceed in a reasonable manner, taking into account the terms and conditions of the court’s judgment or order. If agreement is reached, the procedures for amending this Agreement as specified herein, and in the Procedural Ordinance, shall apply. If agreement is not reached, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving the other party sixty days’ notice of termination.
(c) In the event that amendment is not required, and the court’s judgment or order requires CITY to engage in other or further proceedings, CITY agrees to comply with the terms of the judgment or order expeditiously.

B. Indemnification. LANDOWNER agrees to defend and indemnify CITY, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees against any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, or property damage, arising out of or relating in any way to actions or activities to develop the Property, undertaken by LANDOWNER or LANDOWNER’s contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees.

11. Effect of Subsequent Laws.

A. Laws of Other Agencies.
(1) If any public agency, other than CITY, adopts any new law, regulation, ordinance or imposes any new condition (herein referred to collectively as “the New Law”) after the date of this Agreement, which prevents or precludes either the CITY or LANDOWNER, or both, from complying with one or more provisions of this Agreement, then immediately following the enactment of the New Law the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to determine whether the New Law applies to the Property, and whether suitable amendments to this Agreement can be made, in order to maintain LANDOWNER’s right to develop the Property in a reasonable manner pursuant to Exhibit B.
- 24 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ (2) In the event that the parties, after having engaged in good faith negotiations, are unable to agree on such amendments, the parties shall consider whether suspension of the term of this Agreement is appropriate, and if so, what the terms and conditions of any such suspension should be. In the event that the parties, after having engaged in good faith negotiations are unable to agree on the suspension issues, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving the other party sixty (60) days’ written notice of termination. (3) LANDOWNER or CITY shall have the right to institute litigation relating to the New Law, and raise any issues relating to its validity. If such litigation is filed, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until final judgment is issued.

Provided, however, that if any action that CITY would take in furtherance of this Agreement would be rendered invalid, facially or otherwise, by the New Law, CITY shall not be required to undertake such action until the litigation is resolved, or the New Law is otherwise determined invalid, inapplicable, or is repealed. In the event that such judgment invalidates the New Law, or determines that it does not affect the validity of this Agreement, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and its term shall be extended by the amount of time between the effective date of the New Law, and the effective date of the judgment. In the event that such judgment determines that the validity of this Agreement is, directly or indirectly affected by the New Law, the provisions of subsections 11A(1) and 11A(2) above shall apply.

B. Laws Passed by CITY. Subject to the provisions of section 5 of this Agreement, neither the CITY nor any CITY Agency shall enact any initiative, ordinance, policy, resolution, general plan amendment or other measure that relates to the density or intensity of development on the Property, or the rate, timing or sequencing of the development or the construction on the Property on all or any part thereof, or that is otherwise in conflict, either directly or indirectly, with this Agreement.

12. Enforced Delay; Extension of Times of Performance. In addition to other specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed in default where delay or inability to perform is due to war, insurrection, strikes, walkouts, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, casualties, acts of God, enactment of conflicting state or federal laws or regulations, new or supplementary environmental laws or regulations, litigation instituted by third parties challenging the validity of this Agreement or any of the vested entitlements described in section 5 of this Agreement. Upon request of either party to the other, a written extension of time for such cause shall be granted for the period of the enforced delay, or longer as may be mutually agreed upon.
- 25 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________

13. Legal Actions; Applicable Law; Attorney Fees.

A. Legal Actions. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default by any other party to this Agreement, to enforce any covenant or agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereunder. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, or of this Agreement, in no event shall LANDOWNER or CITY, its officers, agents or employees be liable in damages for any breach, default or violation of this Agreement, it being specifically understood and agreed that the parties’ sole legal remedy for a breach, default or violation of this Agreement shall be a legal action in mandamus, specific performance or other injunctive or declaratory relief to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.

B. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. LANDOWNER agrees and acknowledges that CITY has approved and entered into this Agreement in the sole exercise of its legislative discretion and that the standard of review of the validity and meaning of this Agreement shall be that accorded legislative acts of CITY.

C. Attorney Fees. In any arbitration, quasi-judicial, administrative or judicial proceeding (including appeals), brought by either party hereto to enforce or interpret any covenant or any of such party’s rights or remedies under this Agreement, including any action for declaratory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees and all costs, expenses and disbursements in connection with such action, including the costs of reasonable investigation, preparation and professional or expert consultation, which sums may be included in any judgment or decree entered in such action in favor of the prevailing party. For purposes of this section, and any other portion of this Agreement relating to attorney fees, reasonable attorneys fees of the City Attorney’s Office shall be based on comparable fees of private attorneys practicing in Sacramento County.

14. Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may be amended from time to time only by the mutual written consent of the parties, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code sections 65867 and 65868. In addition, all of the provisions of the Procedural Ordinance relating to the need for amendment, and the manner thereof, shall apply. Upon request of a party, this Agreement shall be amended to include the terms and conditions of any discretionary entitlement granted with respect to the Property after the Effective Date.

15. CITY’s Good Faith in Processing. Subject to the provisions of section 5B hereof, and LANDOWNER’s compliance with each and every term and condition of this Agreement and all of its exhibits, CITY agrees that it will accept in good faith for processing, review, and action, all complete applications for master parcel maps, zoning, planned unit development designation, - 26 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ planned unit development guidelines, schematic plans, special permits, building permits, parcel maps, subdivision maps, or other entitlements for use of the Property in accordance with the General Plan, the NNCP and this Agreement.

CITY shall inform the LANDOWNER, upon request, of the necessary submission requirements for each application for a permit or other entitlement for use in advance, and shall review said application and shall schedule the application for expeditious review by the appropriate authority.

16. Default, Remedies, Termination.

A. General Provisions. Subject to any extensions of time by mutual consent of the parties, and subject to the cure provisions set forth herein, any failure or unreasonable delay by either party to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement shall constitute a default.
(1) LANDOWNER Default. In addition to any other remedy specified herein, in the event that notice of default has been given in accordance with this section, wherein a default by LANDOWNER is alleged, CITY shall not be obligated to issue any building permit, or grant any entitlement as to which an application has been filed. (2) CITY Default. In addition to any other remedy specified herein, in the event that notice of default has been given in accordance with this section, wherein a default by CITY is alleged, any resulting delays in LANDOWNER’s performance caused by CITY’s default shall not constitute a LANDOWNER default, or be grounds for termination or cancellation of this Agreement.
(3) Successors in Interest. Where the Property, following the Effective Date, has been lawfully conveyed in whole or in part to one or more successors in interest, in such a manner as to invoke the provisions of section 4 of this Agreement, and one or more of such successors in interest is in default with respect to the portion of the Property owned by it, neither LANDOWNER nor any other non-defaulting successor in interest shall be liable for the default, if the provisions of section 4 have been complied with, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of that section.

B. Cure of Default. In the event of an alleged default or breach of any terms or conditions of this Agreement, the party alleging such default or breach shall give the other party notice in writing specifying the nature of the alleged default and the manner in which said default may be satisfactorily cured and a reasonable period of time in which to cure, that shall in no event be less than thirty (30) days. During any such period, the party charged - 27 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ shall not be considered in default for purposes of termination or institution of legal proceedings.

C. Remedies After Expiration of Cure Period. After notice and expiration of the thirty (30) day period, if the alleged default has not been cured in the manner set forth in the notice, the other party may at its option:
(1) institute legal proceedings to obtain appropriate judicial relief, including but not limited to mandamus, specific performance, injunctive relief, or termination of this Agreement; or
(2) give the other party notice of intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Government Code section 65868 and the Procedural Ordinance. In the event that such notice is given, CITY shall schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council to review the matter and make specific written findings regarding the alleged default. Where LANDOWNER is the party alleged to be in default, LANDOWNER shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to all allegations of default at such public hearing. CITY shall provide LANDOWNER at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of such public hearing, as well as provide LANDOWNER copies of all CITY staff reports prepared in connection therewith at least five (5) days prior to the hearing.

17. Annual Review.

A. General Provisions. In accordance with Government Code section 65865.1, and the Procedural Ordinance, CITY shall, at least every twelve (12) months during the Term of this Agreement, review the extent of good faith compliance by LANDOWNER with the terms of this Agreement. Failure of CITY to conduct an annual review shall not constitute a waiver by CITY or LANDOWNER of the right to conduct future annual review or to otherwise enforce the provisions of this Agreement, nor shall a party have or assert any defense to such enforcement by reason of any such failure. The failure of CITY to undertake such review, shall not, in itself, invalidate the terms of this Agreement or excuse any party hereto from performing its obligations under this Agreement.

B. Scope of Review. The annual review shall be limited in scope to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

C. Proceedings. The procedures specified in the Procedural Ordinance for conduct of the annual review by the City Manager, and by the City Council, shall apply to each annual review of this Agreement. At least ten (10) days prior to the commencement of any annual review, CITY shall deliver to LANDOWNER a copy of any public staff reports and - 28 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ other documents to be used or relied upon in conducting the review. LANDOWNER shall be permitted an opportunity to respond to CITY’s evaluation of LANDOWNER’s performance by written and oral testimony at the public hearing to be held before the City Council, if LANDOWNER so elects.

At the conclusion of the annual review, CITY shall make written findings and determinations on the basis of substantial evidence, as to whether or not LANDOWNER or its successors have complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

D. Failure of Compliance. Any determination of failure of compliance shall be subject to the notice requirements and cure periods set forth in section 16 of this Agreement. If termination is proposed, it shall apply solely with respect to that portion of the Property (if less than all) affected by the failure to show good faith compliance. If modification of the Development Agreement is proposed, the modification shall pertain solely to the provisions hereof as applicable to that portion of the Property (if less than all) affected by the condition that has prompted the proposed modification.

18. Termination upon Completion of Development.

A. General Provisions. This Agreement shall terminate as to each parcel of property contained within the Property when that parcel of property has been fully developed and all of LANDOWNER’S obligations in connection therewith are satisfied, as reasonably determined by CITY. CITY shall, upon written request made by LANDOWNER to CITY’s Department of Planning and Development, determine if the Agreement has terminated, with respect to any parcel, and shall not unreasonably withhold termination as to that parcel if LANDOWNER’S obligations therewith are satisfied. CITY shall be entitled to receive payment of a fee commensurate with the cost of processing the request and making such a determination, including but not limited to CITY’s administrative and legal expenses. Upon termination of this Agreement, CITY shall upon LANDOWNER’s request record a notice of such termination in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney that the Agreement has been terminated. The aforesaid notice may specify, and LANDOWNER agrees, that termination shall not affect in any manner any continuing obligation to pay any item specified by this Agreement, by the North Natomas Financing Plan or any of the measures implementing said plan, and shall have the effect as set forth in section 18C.

B. Multi-family and Single Family Residential Projects. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect as to any single family residence or multifamily building, and the lot or parcel upon which said residence or building is located, when it has been approved by CITY for occupancy.
- 29 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ C. Effect of Termination On Landowner Obligations. Termination of this Agreement as to the Property or any portion thereof shall not affect any of the LANDOWNER’s obligations to comply with CITY’s General Plan, the NNCP, and all entitlements issued for the Property, nor shall it affect any other covenants of this Agreement specified in this Agreement to continue after the termination of this Agreement, including but not limited to those specified in sections 6 and 10 and subsection 13C.

19. No Joint Venture, Partnership, or Other Relationship. Nothing contained in this Agreement or in any other document executed in connection with this Agreement shall be construed as creating a joint venture or partnership between CITY and LANDOWNER. No relationship exists as between LANDOWNER and CITY other than that of a governmental entity regulating the development of private property, and the owners of such private property.

20. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the principal offices of the CITY and LANDOWNER or LANDOWNER’s assigns and successors, and to Lender, if applicable. Notice shall be effective on the date delivered in person, or the date when received if such notice was mailed to the address of the other party as indicated below:

Notice to the CITY:

Notice to the LANDOWNER:

Notice to Lender:

City of Sacramento
915 I Street
Sacramento, California, 95814 ATTN:

City Manager
Next Generation Capital, LLC.
2935 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 205
Gold River, CA 95670
with copies to:
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
- 30 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ Any party may change the address to which notices are to be mailed by giving written notice of such changed address to each other party in the manner provided herein.

21. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, void or unenforceable but the remainder of the Agreement can be enforced without failure of material consideration to any party, then this Agreement shall not be affected and it shall remain in full force and effect, unless amended or modified by mutual consent of the parties, utilizing the procedures specified herein and the Procedural Ordinance. Provided, however, that if such holding affects a material provision of this Agreement, LANDOWNER shall have the right in its sole discretion to terminate this Agreement upon providing written notice of such termination to CITY; provided further, however, that in the event LANDOWNER so elects to terminate, such election shall not affect in any manner the terms and conditions of any entitlement theretofore granted by CITY with respect to the Property, or any portion thereof.

22. Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded with the Sacramento County Recorder no later than ten (10) days following execution of this Agreement by CITY, which execution will take place no sooner than the effective date of the ordinance approving this Agreement.

23. Reimbursement to CITY. LANDOWNER agrees to reimburse the CITY for reasonable and actual expenses incurred by CITY that relate directly to CITY’S review, consideration and execution of this Agreement. Such expenses include but are not limited to recording fees, publishing fees and any special meeting costs, staff time (including review by the City Attorney), and notice costs. Such expenses shall be paid by LANDOWNER within thirty (30) days of receipt of a detailed written statement of such expenses.

24. Provisions Relating to Lenders.

A. Lender Rights and Obligations.
(1) Prior to Lender Possession. No Lender shall have any obligation or duty under this Agreement to construct or complete the construction of improvements, or to guarantee such construction or completion, and shall not be obligated to pay any fees or charges which are liabilities of LANDOWNER or LANDOWNER’s successors in interest, but shall otherwise be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which pertains to the Property or such portion thereof in which it holds an interest. Nothing in this section shall be construed to grant to a Lender rights beyond those of LANDOWNER hereunder, or to limit any remedy CITY has hereunder in the event of default by LANDOWNER, including but not limited to termination and/or refusal to grant entitlements with respect to the Property. - 31 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ (2) Lender in Possession. A Lender who comes into possession of the Property, or any portion thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust, or a deed in lieu of foreclosure, shall not be obligated to pay any fees or charges which are obligations of LANDOWNER, and which remain unpaid as of the date such Lender takes possession of the Property or portion thereof. Provided, however, that a Lender shall not be eligible to apply for or receive entitlements with respect to the Property, or otherwise be entitled to develop the Property or devote the Property to any uses or to construct any improvements thereon other than the development contemplated or authorized by this Agreement and subject to all of the terms and conditions hereof, including payment of all fees (delinquent, current and accruing in the future) and charges, and assumption of all obligations of LANDOWNER hereunder; provided, further, that no Lender, or successor thereof, shall be entitled to the rights and benefits of the LANDOWNER hereunder or entitled to enforce the provisions of this Agreement against CITY unless and until such Lender or successor thereof qualifies as a recognized assignee under the provisions of section 4 of this Agreement.

B. Notice of LANDOWNER’s Default Hereunder. If CITY receives notice from a Lender requesting a copy of any notice of default given LANDOWNER hereunder and specifying the address for service thereof, then CITY shall deliver to such Lender, concurrently with service thereon to LANDOWNER, any notice given to LANDOWNER with respect to any claim by CITY that LANDOWNER has committed a default, and if CITY makes a determination of non-compliance, CITY shall likewise serve notice of such non-compliance on such Lender concurrently with service thereof on LANDOWNER.

C. Lender’s Right to Cure. Each Lender shall have the right (but not the obligation) during the same period of time available to LANDOWNER to cure or remedy, on behalf of LANDOWNER, the default claimed or the areas of non-compliance set forth in CITY’s notice. Such action shall not entitle a Lender to develop the property or otherwise partake of any benefits of this Agreement unless such Lender shall assume and perform all obligations of LANDOWNER hereunder.

D. Other Notices Given By City. A copy of all notices given by CITY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to Lender at the address provided in section 20 hereof.

25. Estoppel Certificate. Either party may, at any time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to the other party requesting such other party to certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the certifying party, (i) this Development Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the parties, (ii) this Development Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, or if so amended, identifying the amendments, and (iii) the requesting party is not in default in the performance of its obligations under this Development - 32 - North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ Agreement, or if in default, describing therein the nature and amount of any such defaults. A party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return such estoppel certificate, or give a written detailed response explaining why it will not do so, within thirty (30) days following the receipt of each such request. Each party acknowledges that such an estoppel certificate may be relied upon by third parties acting in good faith. A certificate provided by CITY establishing the status of this Agreement with respect to the Property or any portion thereof shall be in recordable form and may be recorded at the expense of the recording party.

26. Construction. All parties have had the opportunity to be represented by legal counsel of their own choice in the preparation of this Development Agreement and no presumption or rule that “an ambiguity shall be construed against a drafting party” shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of any provision hereof. Captions on sections and subsections are provided for convenience only and shall not be deemed to limit, amend or affect the meaning of the provision to which they pertain.

27. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and shall be deemed duly executed when each of the parties has executed such a counterpart.

28. Time. Time is of the essence of each and every provision hereof.

29. Limitation of Actions. No court action shall be filed by a party to this Agreement on the ground of default or breach of its terms unless such action is filed within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts underlying the claim of breach or default.

30. No Third Parties Benefitted. No Person who is not a qualified successor or assign of a party hereto pursuant to section 4 of this Agreement, or who has not become a party by duly adopted amendment hereof may claim the benefit of any provision of this Agreement.

31. Effect of Agreement upon Title to Property. In accordance with the provisions of Government Code section 65868.5, from and after the time of recordation of this Agreement, the Agreement shall impart such notice thereof to all persons as is afforded by the recording laws of the State of California. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement.

32. Covenant of Good Faith. CITY and LANDOWNER agree that each of them shall at all times act in good faith in order to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

33. Exhibits: The following are the exhibits to this Agreement:
- 33 -
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC

FOR CITY CLERK USE ONLY
Ordinance No. ______________________
City Agreement No. ______________________ Date Adopted: ______________________ A Legal Description of the Property
B Landowner’s Development Plan
C Special Conditions
D Assignment and Assumption Agreement
E North Natomas Land Acquisition Program
F Protest Waiver Form
G Irrevocable Offer of Dedication Form
H Map and Categorical Listing of Land and Infrastructure

34. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with its Exhibits A to H, inclusive, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.

This Agreement is specifically intended by the parties hereto to supersede all prior development agreements, if any, for the Property which may exist between CITY and LANDOWNER. The provisions of subsection 10B of this Agreement, relating to indemnification and defense of CITY, its officers, employees and agents, shall be applicable to any claim whatsoever against CITY, its officers, employees and agents, arising out of or in any way relating to any prior development agreement relating to the Property.

35. City Attorney Costs. Landowner shall pay to the City of Sacramento the sum of $1,500.00 as and for reimbursement of the costs of the City Attorney in preparation and processing of this Agreement.
››› Signature Page Follows ‹‹‹

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXECUTION PAGE FOR LENDER
EͬA (herein “LENDER”) owns an equitable interest in the Property described in Exhibit “A” of this Agreement as the beneficiary of that certain deed of trust and assignment of rents dated [date] and recorded on [date], as Instrument [#], in Book [#], Page [#], Official Records, Sacramento County, California.

LENDER hereby executes this Agreement and agrees to be bound by the terms and condition hereof, subject to the limitations set forth in section 24 hereof.

LENDER requests that it be provided with copies of all notices mailed to LANDOWNER pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and that said copies be addressed as follows:
________EͬA____________
_________________ͺͺͺ___
_______________________
Attn: ___________________
Dated: ____________, 20[ ]
LENDER: ________________________________
Signature
By: _____________________________
Its: ____________________________
(ATTACH APPROPRIATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT)
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF LANDOWNER’S PROPERTY

SEE ATTACHED
NOTE: UPON RECORDATION OF FINAL MASTER PARCEL MAP, THIS EXHIBIT A WILL BE REPLACED BY THE SAID MAP, WITHOUT NEED FOR AMENDMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT.

EXHIBIT "A"
The land described herein is situated in the State of California. County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, described as follows:.

Parcel A as shown the Parcel entitled "Machado Parcel Map" filed for record in the Office of the County Recorder of Sacramento County, California on October 17. 2005 in Book 185 of Parcel Maps at Page 20.

APN: 225-0ISO-OSS-0000
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXHIBIT B
LANDOWNER’S DEVELOPMENT PLAN

SEE ATTACHED

N 00°41'23" W
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY)
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
[435 BM 2]
LOT 35

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[435 BM 2]
LOT Y
[435 BM 2]
LOT 37
[435 BM 2]
LOT 38
[435 BM 2]
LOT 39
[435 BM 2]
LOT 40
[435 BM 2]
LOT 41
[435 BM 2]
LOT N
[435 BM 2]
LOT T

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O
O O O
O
O

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
10" SS
12" W
10" SS 10" SS
12" W
10" SS S S S
D
D D
D
D D
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
N 00°41'23" W
N 89°33'33" E
N 00°41'23" W 244.00'

25.00' 25.00'
363.03'

25.00' 25.00'
244.00'
365.50'
512.20'
N 89°33'33" E 96.50'
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
B
-
A
-
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE

PROPOSED PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 EXISTING12.5' PUE

CL-EXISTING
25' ROW

CL-EXISTING
25' ROW

56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

33.50' 33.50' 30.50' 30.50'

40.00'
201.00'

35.50' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70'

64.00'

64.00'

64.00'

42.50' 32.00'

32.50'

30.50' 30.50'

32.00'
244.00'

30.50' 30.50'

64.00' 58.00'

64.00' 58.00'

58.00'

24.00' 59.00' 24.00' 40.00' 20.50' 23.58'

20.78'

24.00' 34.75' 34.71' 34.79' 34.75' 31.00' 56.97'

30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 33.50' 33.50'

64.00'

56.00' 118.00'

56.32'

56.63'

56.91'

56.46'

56.77'

57.06'

57.12'

57.27'

57.41'

57.55'

57.69'

57.83'

58.03' 24.00'

32.50'

45.00'

32.50'

32.50'

32.50'

56.20'

42.61'
244.00'

32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 35.50' 32.50'

31.00'

56.00'

30.50'

24.00'

56.00'

56.59'

60.00' 58.00'
118.00'

22.16'

27.50'
138.00'

31.00' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 31.00'

20.35'

20.83' 20.00'

58.55' 58.00' 58.58'
198.13'

20.01'

20.74'

21.83'

93.00'

56.00'

59.00'

30.50' 30.50' 32.00'

21.43'

27.50'

56.05'

19.50'

57.98'

32.70'

23.00'

30.50'

21.50'
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L14
L13
L15
C1
L16
C2
L17
C3
C4
C5
L18
L19
L20
C6
C7
L21
C8L22C9
L23
C10
L25
C11
C12
C13
L26
C14
L27
L29
L28
L30
L31
L33
L32
L34
L35 L36
L40
L37
L38
L39
L41
L42
L43
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
L44

CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
LENGTH

6.89'

16.50'

41.05'

5.89'

10.61'

4.19'

3.14'

4.19'

3.14'

47.27'

16.50'

10.19'

6.31'

6.42'
RADIUS

42.00'

38.50'

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

2.00'

3.00'

2.00'

3.00'

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

42.00'
DELTA

9.40°

24.56°

56.01°

8.76°

15.79°
120.00°

60.00°
120.00°

60.00°

64.49°

24.56°

15.16°

9.39°

8.76°

LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
LENGTH

12.50'

12.50'

10.00'

10.00'

12.50'

5.66'

1.00'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.51'

3.59'

3.41'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

3.51'

3.50'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

2.75'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.00'

5.66'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

3.00'

4.00'

12.50'

17.00'

BEARING
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N45° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S81° 02' 16"E
S56° 29' 00"E
N30° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
S30° 26' 27"E
S56° 14' 50"W
N80° 47' 19"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S44° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S0° 41' 23"E
S0° 26' 24"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E

CURVE TABLE
50' ROW
N
0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE:1"=30'

TENTATIVE MAP FOR

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
225-0150-055
3600 AIRPORT ROAD

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
N
LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

EXISTING CENTER LINE

PROPOSED LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE
EXISTING 1-FT CONTOUR LINE
EXISTING 5-FT CONTOUR LINE

EXISTING TREE
ss ss
TENTATIVE MAP NOTES:

SUBDIVISION NAME: THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
(APN): 225-0150-055
PROPERTY OWNER / SUBDIVIDER:

PARAMDEEP SINGH
1469 EMERGING TECH LLC
4067 GLOSTER WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
APPLICANT/CIVIL ENGINEER:

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL, INC.

ANDREW MACDONALD
3010 LAVA RIDGE CT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
PHONE: 916-978-4001
[email protected]
SITE SURVEYOR:

BARBER SURVEYING, INC.

SHANE R. BARBER
261 BOEING CT
LIVERMORE, CA 94551
PHONE: 925-344-6461
[email protected]
DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 2025
FLOOD PLAIN:

ZONE A99, SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA WITHOUT BASE
FLOOD ELEVATION.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 06067C0045J - JUNE 2015
FIRE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
POLICE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO - DISTRICT 2
SCHOOL DISTRICT:

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
PARK DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
WATER DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO WATER
REFUSE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO SOLID WASTE SERVICES
STORM DRAIN DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO DEPT OF UTILITIES
SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT:

SACSEWER
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING R-1A-SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED R-1A-PUD-SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE:

RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED USE:

RESIDENTIAL - 32 LOTS
OPEN SPACE - 6 LOTS
PRIVATE ROADS - 2 LOTS
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING PARCEL AREA(S):
(APN): 225-0150-055 = 88,247 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PARCEL AREA(S):

EXISTING GROSS AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED NET AREA (32 LOTS) = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
TOTAL AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED DENSITY:

15.76 DU/ACRE (NET)
sd sd
w w
232
230

1. CURRENT ON-SITE CONDITION INCLUDES EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WITH A DETACHED GARAGE AND SHED. THE EXISTING STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED/RELOCATED.

2. EXISTING SITE IS RELATIVELY FLAT WITH THREE SUB-SHED DRAINAGE

AREAS THAT SHEET FLOW SLIGHTLY FROM NORTHWEST TO WEST, FROM NORTH TO THE SOUTHWEST, AND FROM NORTHEAST TO SOUTHEAST.

3. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC MAIN LINES IN TANZANITE AVENUE.

4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM INFORMATION FURNISHED IN A PARCEL MAP ENTITLED "MACHADO PARCEL MAP" FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 17, 2005 IN BOOK 185 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 20, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR

MATTERS OF RECORD NOT STATED IN SAID PARCEL MAP THAT MAY

AFFECT THE BOUNDARY LINES, EXCEPTIONS, OR EASEMENTS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY.

5. THE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS PERFORMED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHANE R. BARBER, LS 9097.

6. NO VERNAL POOLS OR WETLANDS EXIST ON THE SITE. THERE IS (4) 3"-4" TREES, (77) 6" TREES, AND (23) 8"-18" TREES ON-SITE.

7. DUE TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ALL TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED, NONE ARE PROTECTED.

GENERAL MAP NOTES:

DATUM NOTE:

BASIS OF BEARINGS: NORTH 00°41'23" WEST TAKEN ON THE CENTERLINE

OF NATURITA WAY AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL MAP OF MACHADO SUBDIVISON VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 CITY OF SACRAMENTO BM 277-A2C (17.906') 12 ON-SITE PARKING STALLS ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE PRIVATE ALLEY ACROSS FROM LOTS 8-13. REFER TO SITE PLAN.

PARKING NOTE:
g g
e e

2.67'
⅊ ℄

EXISTING

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER

PROPOSED
5' SIDEWALK

PUBLIC ROAD SECTION - TANZANITE AVENUE A NOT TO SCALE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE

PROPOSED PARCEL INFORMATION
PARCEL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-12 13 14 15 16
LOT AREA (SF) 1882 1889 1884 1880 1875 1870 2025 1736 1946 1736 1909 1904 1729 LOT AREA (AC) 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.046 0.040 0.045 0.040 0.044 0.044 0.040 PARCEL # 17 18 19 20 21 22, 23 24 25 26, 27 28 29 30, 31 32 LOT AREA (SF) 1724 1720 1716 1824 2021 1919 1962 1885 1769 1856 2020 1919 1832 LOT AREA (AC) 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.046 0.044 0.045 0.043 0.041 0.043 0.046 0.064 0.042

LOTS A B C D E F G H
LOT AREA (SF) 700 1475 738 725 3561 3317 17619 566
LOT AREA (AC) 0.016 0.034 0.017 0.017 0.082 0.076 0.404 0.013 80 5

E COMMERCE WAY
TANZANITE AVE. AIRPORT RD.

TRUXEL RD.

SAN JUAN RD.

AZEVEDO DR.

DUCKHORN DR.

PROJECT
SITE
1' BENCH
EX ±16.33'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±16'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±2.67'
EX ±5'
SW
DATE: 09/29/2025
DRAWN BY: RS

REVISIONS

DELTA DATE DESCRIPTION
1 - -
2 3
4 5
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PUE) FOR DRY UTILITIES ONLY, AND A CITY WATER METER EASEMENT (WAE) WILL BE PROPOSED OVER AND 4' AND 10' ADJACENT TO THE ONSITE PRIVATE ALLEY. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS

AGREEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER THE PRIVATE ALLEY THROUGH PORTIONS OF LOT 1-32 AND LOTS A-H.

PUBLIC EASEMENT NOTE:
50' ROW
⅊ ℄

EXISTING

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER

PROPOSED
6' APRON

PUBLIC ROAD SECTION - TANZANITE AVENUE B NOT TO SCALE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE EX ±16.33'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±16'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±2.67' EX ±5'
SW
DRIVEWAY 1" LIP
SAWCUT

PROPOSED

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER
4' MIN.

SAWCUT
4' MIN. MATCH EX MATCH EX

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT N
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd sd sdss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
ss ss
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W
12" SD
10" SS
12" W
10" SS
24" SD
12" SD
S S S
D D
D
D
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
24 23
22 21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

56.00'

33.50' 33.50' 30.50' 30.50'

40.00'
201.00'

35.50' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70'

64.00'

64.00'

64.00'

42.50'

32.00'

32.50'

30.50' 30.50'

32.00'
244.00'

30.50' 30.50'

64.00' 58.00'

64.00' 58.00'

58.00'

24.00' 59.00' 24.00' 40.00' 20.50' 23.58'

20.78'

24.00' 34.75' 34.71' 34.79' 34.75' 31.00' 56.97'

30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 33.50' 33.50'

64.00'

56.00' 118.00'

56.32'

56.63'

56.91'

56.46'

56.77'

57.06'

57.12'

57.27'

57.41'

57.55'

57.69'

57.83'

58.03' 24.00'

32.50'

45.00'

32.50'

32.50'

32.50'

56.20'

42.61'
244.00'

32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 35.50' 32.50'

31.00'

56.00'

30.50'

24.00'

56.00'

56.59'

60.00' 58.00'
118.00'

22.16'

27.50'
138.00'

31.00' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 31.00'

20.35'

20.83' 20.00'

58.55' 58.00' 58.58'
198.13'

20.01'

20.74'

21.83'

93.00'

56.00'

59.00'

30.50' 30.50' 32.00'

21.43'

27.50'

56.05'

19.50'

57.98'

32.70'

23.00'

30.50'

21.50'
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14 L15
C1
L16
C2
L17
C3
C4
C5
L18
L19
L20
C6
C7
L21
C8L22 C9
L23
C10
L25
C11
C12
C13
L26
C14
L27
L29
L28 L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35 L36 L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43

PRIVATE ALLEY
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 3
3 3
4 4
4 4

PRIVATE ALLEY

11.8'
4 4
4 1
2 2

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY
3 11.8'
EXISTING12.5' PUE

3.5'
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
4'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
10'
6'
4' 7.75' 0.5' 7.75' 0.5' 7.75' 0.5' 4' 0.5' 0.5'
6'
6'
8'
8'

11.2'

6.5'

0.5'

3.5' 3.5'

0.5' 0.5'

3.5'

0.5'

3.5' 3.5' 0.5' EXISTING

12.5' PUE

13.5'

0.5' 0.5' 0.5'
5'

11.2' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12'
5'
5'
20' EVA &

PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
4' 4'
5'

3.5' 3.5' 3.5' 13.5'
20' 10'

13.5' 0.5'

3.5'

0.5'

3.5'

0.5'
5'
12'
12'
8'

13.5' 3.5' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 8.5' 0.5'
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
1'
12'
12'

12.8'

4.75' 3.5'
20'
12'

12.8'
12'
1'
1'
1'
1'

11.85'

11.72'

11.58'

11.43'

11.29'

11.15'

11.03' 11.01'

10.9'

10.77'

10.58'

10.44'

10.31'

10.18'
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
20' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

3.5' 3.5'

0.5' 0.5' 0.5'
EXISTING12.5' PUE
EXISTING12.5' PUE
119'
36'
4'
4'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
7'
7'
11'
5'
5'
5'
5'
7'
11'
7'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
24' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
20' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
4'
4'

3.5'
3'
4'
6'
4'

3.5'
20' EVA &

PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'

0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5'

7.5'

7.43'
10' PROPOSED PRIVATE

RECIPRICAL ACCESS
3'
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2 PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
18' TYP
5'
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
1 2
L44

LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
LENGTH

12.50'

12.50'

10.00'

10.00'

12.50'

5.66'

1.00'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.51'

3.59'

3.41'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

3.51'

3.50'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

2.75'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.00'

5.66'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

3.00'

4.00'

12.50'

17.00'

BEARING
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N45° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S81° 02' 16"E
S56° 29' 00"E
N30° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
S30° 26' 27"E
S56° 14' 50"W
N80° 47' 19"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S44° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S0° 41' 23"E
S0° 26' 24"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E

CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C11
C12
C13
C14
LENGTH

6.89'

16.50'

5.89'

10.61'

4.19'

3.14'

4.19'

3.14'

16.50'

10.19'

6.31'

6.42'
RADIUS

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

2.00'

3.00'

2.00'

3.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

42.00'
DELTA

9.40°

24.56°

8.76°

15.79°
120.00°

60.00°
120.00°

60.00°

24.56°

15.16°

9.39°

8.76°

CURVE TABLE
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/29/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
LOT SUMMARY:

EXISTING USE:

RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED USE:

RESIDENTIAL - 32 LOTS
OPEN SPACE - 6 LOTS
PRIVATE ROAD - 2 LOTS
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING PARCEL AREA(S):
(APN): 225-0150-055 = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PARCEL AREA(S):

TOTAL PROPOSED NET AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
TOTAL PROPOSED GROSS AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED DENSITY:

15.76 DU/ACRE (NET)
PROJECT SUMMARY:

SUBDIVISION NAME: THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
(APN): 225-0150-055
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING R-1A SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED R-1A-PUD-SINGLE FAMILY
LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

EXISTING CENTER LINE

PROPOSED LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECT PLANS FOR DETAILS)

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP
O
C1.0

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
N
80 5

E COMMERCE WAY
TANZANITE AVE. AIRPORT RD.

TRUXEL RD.

SAN JUAN RD.

AZEVEDO DR.

DUCKHORN DR.

PROJECT
SITE

ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION KEYNO
CONSTRUCT STANDARD VERTICAL CURB.

CONSTRUCT ZERO CURB.

CONSTRUCT ROLLED CURB.

CONSTRUCT VERTICAL TO ROLLED CURB TRANSITION.
1 2
3 4

PROPOSED PARCEL INFORMATION
PARCEL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-12 13 14 15 16
LOT AREA (SF) 1882 1889 1884 1880 1875 1870 2025 1736 1946 1736 1909 1904 1729 LOT AREA (AC) 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.046 0.040 0.045 0.040 0.044 0.044 0.040 BLDG. FOOTPRINT (SF) 1106 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 NET BLDG. AREA (SF) 1658 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 LOT COVERAGE (%) 58.8 56.5 56.7 56.8 57.0 57.1 52.7 61.5 54.9 61.5 55.9 56.1 61.8 FAR 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.94 0.84 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.94 PARCEL # 17 18 19 20 21 22, 23 24 25 26, 27 28 29 30, 31 32 LOT AREA (SF) 1724 1720 1716 1824 2021 1919 1962 1885 1769 1856 2020 1919 1832 LOT AREA (AC) 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.046 0.044 0.045 0.043 0.041 0.043 0.046 0.044 0.042 BLDG. FOOTPRINT (SF) 1068 1068 1068 1106 1068 1068 1106 1106 1068 1068 1068 1068 1106 NET BLDG. AREA (SF) 1627 1627 1627 1658 1627 1627 1658 1658 1627 1627 1627 1627 1658 LOT COVERAGE (%) 61.9 62.1 62.2 60.6 52.8 55.7 56.4 58.7 60.4 57.5 52.9 55.7 60.4 FAR 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.81 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.81 0.85 0.91 sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd
sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
oe
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
S S

D D SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SS
SS
SS

SD SD SD SD SD SD
WW
S S
D
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M

SD SD SD
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD
< < <
< < < < < < < <

SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD
< < < < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD

SD SD SD
SD SD SD < < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < <

SD SD SD SD SD SD
< < < < <
< < < < <
< < <

JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD
D D
FIRE
M

M M M M M
M
M
M
M
M
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 24 1
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 TANZANITE AVENUE

AIRPORT ROAD

EXISTING

RESIDENTIAL

EXISTING

RESIDENTIAL

PEDESTRIAN

CONNECTION

CLEAR ZONE PER SACRAMENTO CITY
CODE 17.612.010 AND 17.620.100, TYP.

MAINTAIN TREE BRANCHES ABOVE 5',
NO SHRUBS OVER 3.5' HIGH MEASURED

FROM STREET
1 L2

HORIZONTAL WOOD
FENCE, TYP.
2 L2

GOOD NEIGHBOR
FENCE, TYP.
3 L2

PRECAST FENCE
SYSTEM, TYP.
(AIRPORT ROAD FRONTAGE ONLY)
LOT LINE, TYP. WATER LINE,
SEE CIVIL, TYP.

JOINT TRENCH, SEE
ELECTRICAL, TYP.

STORM DRAIN,
SEE CIVIL, TYP.
4' PUE, TYP.

SANITARY SEWER,
SEE CIVIL, TYP.
21' TO 25' O.C.

WHERE SPACE
ALLOWS

12.5 PUE,
TYP.

PUE, TYP.

EXISTING STORM
DRAIN, TYP.

EXISTING WATER
LINE, TYP.

EXISTING SEWER
LINE, TYP.

RIGHT-OF-WAY,
TYP.

PROPERTY
LINE, TYP.

DECORATIVE GRAVEL, TYP. 3/4”
“CALIFORNIA GOLD” MIN. 2” THICK,

OVER FILTER FABRIC

EXISTING OVERHEAD
POWER LINE, TYP.
5' EASEMENT, TYP.

BUILDING
OVERHANG, TYP.

EXISTING STREET
LIGHT, TYP.

TRANSFORMER,
TYP.

TRANSFORMER,
TYP.

TRANSFORMER,
TYP.

INSTALL FLEXIBLE ROOT BARRIER SYSTEM
WITHIN 10' OF SEWER MAIN/LATERAL, TYP.

FOR ALL TREES AND SHRUBS WITHIN

EASEMENT

SOLID WASTE

PICKUP LOCATION,
TYP.

SHADE TREE

SINGLE SPECIES AT EACH STREET SELECTED FOR SHADE AND MODERATE CANOPY GROWTH
PISTACIA X `RED PUSH` / RED PUSH PISTACHE
WUCOLS (L), 25' - 40' H X 25' - 40' W AT MATURITY.
15 GAL., L 20' o.c.

ULMUS PROPINQUA `JFS-BIEBERICH` / EMERALD SUNSHINE® ELM WUCOLS (M), 25' - 40' H X 15' - 25' W AT MATURITY.
15 GAL., M 20' o.c.

ZELKOVA SERRATA `VILLAGE GREEN` / VILLAGE GREEN JAPANESE ZELKOVA WUCOLS (M), 40' - 50' H X 40' - 50' W AT MATURITY.
15 GAL, M 20' o.c.

ACCENT TREE
ACCENT TREES: SMALLER SIZE SUITABLE FOR PLANTING ADJACENT HOMES. LOCATED

NEAR FRONT WALK BUT NOT DIRECTLY IN LINE WITH DOORS OR WINDOWS CERCIS CANADENSIS `OKLAHOMA` / OKLAHOMA REDBUD
WUCOLS (M), 20' - 30' H X 20' - 30' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX, M 20' o.c.

CHIONANTHUS RETUSUS / CHINESE FRINGE TREE
WUCOLS (M), 10' - 30' H X 10' - 30' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX, M 20' o.c.

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA `NATCHEZ` / WHITE CRAPE MYRTLE
WUCOLS (L), 20' - 30' H X 15' - 20' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX, L 20' o.c.

MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA 'KAY PARRIS' / KAY PARRIS SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA WUCOLS (M), 15' - 20' H X 8' - 10' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX, M 20' o.c.

SECONDARY TREE

EVERGREEN SECONDARY TREES FOR BUFFER

ELAEOCARPUS DECIPIENS / JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TREE
WUCOLS (M), 6' - 10' H X 3' - 6' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX 20' o.c.

MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA `LITTLE GEM` / DWARF SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA WUCOLS (M), 15' - 20' H X 8' - 10' W AT MATURITY.
24" BOX, M 16' o.c.

PRUNUS CAROLINIANA / CAROLINA CHERRY LAUREL
WUCOLS (M), TREE FORM. 15' - 25' H X 15' - 25' W AT MATURITY. 24" BOX 20' o.c.

RHAPHIOLEPIS X 'MONTIC' TM / MAJESTIC BEAUTY INDIAN HAWTHORN WUCOLS (M), TREE FORM. 15' - 25' H X 10' - 15' W AT MATURITY. 24" BOX 20' o.c.

REAR YARD TREE
FUTURE MEDIUM CANOPY TREES TO BE INSTALLED AS HOMES ARE BUILT. INSTALL SMALL

CANOPY TREES UNDER EXISTING POWER LINE WHERE APPLICABLE

VERTICAL SCREEN
VERTICAL SCREENING SHRUBS - UPRIGHT HABIT, USED AGAINST WALLS, FENCES, ETC.

ELAEOCARPUS DECIPIENS `LITTLE EMPEROR` / DWARF JAPANESE BLUEBERRY TREE WUCOLS (M), 8'-10' H X 6'-8' W AT MATURITY
15 GAL., M 4" o.c.

LAURUS X 'SARATOGA' / SARATOGA HYBRID LAUREL
WUCOLS (L), 10'-15' H X 8'-10' W AT MATURITY
15 GAL., L 5" o.c.

LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM' / TEXAS PRIVET
WUCOLS (M), 10' H X 6' W AT MATURITY
15 GAL., M 4" o.c.

PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS `MAKI` / MAKI YEW PODOCARPUS
WUCOLS (M), 8' -10' H X 6'-8' W AT MATURITY
15 GAL., M 4" o.c.

PRUNUS CAROLINIANA "COMPACTA" / DWARF CAROLINA LAUREL
WUCOLS (M), 8'-10' H X 6'-8' W AT MATURITY
15 GAL., L 4" o.c.

LARGE SHRUBS

LARGE, EVERGREEN SHRUBS USED AS FOUNDATION PLANTING, BACKGROUND PLANTING, AND FOR SCREENING.

ESCALLONIA X `COMPACTA` / COMPACT ESCALLONIA
WUCOLS (M), 3'-4' H X 5'-6' W AT MATURITY.
5 GAL., M 3" o.c.

PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA `VARIEGATA` / VARIEGATED MOCK ORANGE WUCOLS (M), S/W EXPOSURES, 3'-5' H X 3'-6' W AT MATURITY. 5 GAL., M 4" o.c.

RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR' / DWARF YEDDO HAWHORNE
WUCOLS (L), 4'-5' H X 4'-5' W AT MATURITY.
5 GAL., L 3" o.c.

ACCENT PLANTS
ACCENT PLANTS FOR SPECIAL INTEREST DUE TO UNIQUE FLOWERS OR FOLIAGE.

ABELIA X GRANDIFLORA 'KALEIDOSCOPE' / KALEIDOSCOPE GLOSSY ABELIA WUCOLS (M), 1'-3' H X 3'-6' W AT MATURITY
5 GAL. 4" o.c.

DIANELLA REVOLUTA `LITTLE REV` / `LITTLE REV` FLAX LILY WUCOLS (L), S/W EXPOSURE, 2'-4' H X 1'-2' W AT MATURITY. 5 GAL., L 2.5" o.c.

DIETES VEGETA / FORTNIGHT LILY
WUCOLS (L), 2'-3' H X 2'-3' W AT MATURITY.
5 GAL., L 4" o.c.

NANDINA DOMESTICA 'FIREPOWER' / FIREPOWER HEAVENLY BAMBOO WUCOLS (L), 1'-3' H X 1'-3' W AT MATURITY
5 GAL. 4" o.c.

NANDINA DOMESTICA 'LEMON-LIME' / LEMON-LIME HEAVENLY BAMBOO WUCOLS (L), 1'-3' H X 1'-3' W AT MATURITY
5 GAL., L 4" o.c.

ROSA X 'MEIRADENA' / ICECAP™ FLORIBUNDA ROSE
WUCOLS (L). 1.5-3' H X 1-3' H AT MATURITY. DO NOT USE ADJACENT TO WALKS 5 GAL. 4" o.c.

SMALL VERTICAL SHRUBS
UPRIGHT SHRUBS FOR SMALL SPACES, TYPICALLY EVERGREEN.

BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA `GREEN BEAUTY` / GREEN BEAUTY JAPANESE BOXWOOD WUCOLS (M), 3'-5' H X 3'-6' W AT MATURITY.
5 GAL., M 4" o.c.

ESCALLONIA X `NEWPORT DWARF` / NEWPORT DWARF ESCALLONIA WUCOLS (M), 2'-3' H X 4'-6' W AT MATURITY.
5 GAL., M 3" o.c.

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'BARBEQUE' / BARBEQUE ROSEMARY
WUCOLS (L), 4'-5' H X 3'-4' W AT MATURITY
5 GAL., L 3" o.c.

SPIRAEA JAPONICA `ANTHONY WATERER` / ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA WUCOLS (M), 3'-4' H X 4'-5' W AT MATURITY
5 GAL., M 4" o.c.

GROUNDCOVER
GROUNDCOVER: SPREADING PLANTS, TYPICALLY EVERGREEN, AS FOREGROUND AND TURF SUBSTITUTE.

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X `EMERALD CARPET` / EMERALD CARPET MANZANITA WUCOLS (M), 1' H X 4' W AT MATURITY
1 GAL., M 36" o.c.

JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS `BLUE RUG` / BLUE RUG JUNIPER
WUCOLS (L), ALL EXPOSURES, 0.5' H X 8' W AT MATURITY
1 GAL., L 36" o.c.

MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM / TRAILING MYOPORUM
WUCOLS (L), 1' H X 12' W AT MATURITY
1 GAL., L 36" o.c.

ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'HUNTINGTON CARPET' / HUNTINGTON CARPET ROSEMARY WUCOLS (L), ALL EXPOSURES, 1' - 2' H X 8' W AT MATURITY 1 GAL., L 36" o.c.

TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES 'STAR' / STAR JASMINE
WUCOLS (M), 2' H AT MATURITY
1 GAL., M 36" o.c.

FLOWERING GROUNDCOVERS
LOW FLOWERING GROUNDCOVERS, USED TO ADD INTEREST AND COLOR AT CORNERS.

GREVILLEA LANIGERA 'MT. TAMBORITHA' / MT. TAMBORITHA WOOLLY GREVILLEA WUCOLS (L), 1' - 2' H X 4' - 5' W AT MATURITY
1 GAL., L 30" o.c.

ROSA X `MEIZORLAND` TM / WHITE DRIFT GROUNDCOVER ROSE
WUCOLS (M), ALL EXPOSURES, 1' - 1.5' H X 2.5' - 3' W AT MATURITY. 1 GAL., M 30" o.c.

ROSA X `NOARE` / FLOWER CARPET® RED GROUNDCOVER ROSE
WUCOLS (M), ALL EXPOSURES, 2' - 3' H X 3' - 4' W AT MATURITY 1 GAL., M 30" o.c.

VERBENA CANADENSIS `HOMESTEAD PURPLE` / HOMESTEAD PURPLE VERBENA WUCOLS (L), 0.5' H X 1.5' - 2.5' W AT MATURITY
1 GAL., L 30" o.c.

September 5, 2025
Sacramento, CA
R&C PN: 25034A
0' 20' 40'
1" = 20' L1 Enclave at Airport Road Preliminary Landscape Plan N

IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL CONFORM TO THE LOCALLY ADOPTED MODEL WATER USE ORDINANCE. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED FROM INDIVIDUAL LOTS, BUT WILL BE HOA-MAINTAINED. CONTROLLER WILL BE "SMART" WITH SELF-ADJUSTING PROGRAMS BASED ON LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS. A EVAPOTRANSPIRATION/WEATHER SENSOR, RAIN SENSOR, FLOW SENSOR, AND MASTER VALVE WILL BE INSTALLED. HYDROZONES WILL BE BASED ON EXPOSURE, PLANT WATER REQUIREMENTS AND EMISSION TYPE. IRRIGATION EMISSION SYSTEM WILL GENERALLY CONSIST OF:
 POINT-SOURCE DRIP EMITTERS FOR ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER  DRIP RINGS FOR TREES

IRRIGATION DESIGN STATEMENT

PRELIMINARY PLANT LEGEND

1. STREET TREES:

1.1. TREES WILL BE SPACED SUCH THAT ALL TREES ARE A MINIMUM OF 5' CLEAR OF ALL DRIVEWAY APRONS AND SIDEWALKS, 10' FROM STREET LIGHTS, 8' FROM TRANSFORMER, 5' FROM UTILITY LINES AND FIRE HYDRANTS.

1.2. SPACE STREET TREES TO AVOID OBSTRUCTIONS (AND OMIT TREE IF REQUIRED BY SPECIFIC LOT CONDITIONS), BUT MAINTAIN AN AVERAGE SPACING OF 21'-25' O.C. ACROSS ALL FRONTAGE WITHIN THIS PROJECT.

1.3. NO TREES SHALL BE PLANTED DIRECTLY ON PROPERTY LINES.

TREE PLANTING NOTES

1. RIGID ROOT BARRIER: FOLLOW ALL JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS. AT MINIMUM IF NOT OTHERWISE REQUIRED OR NOTED: WHERE STREET TREES ARE WITHIN 5 FEET

OF THE PAVING OR CURB (HARDSCAPE), PROVIDE A ROOT CONTROL BARRIER PANEL ALONG THE FACE OF HARDSCAPE. PANELS SHALL BE MINIMUM 18” DEEP. FROM CENTERLINE OF TREE, EXTEND PANELS EXTEND 10' IN EACH DIRECTION AT EDGE OF HARDSCAPE. ADDITIONALLY, MEDIANS WITH TREES SHALL HAVE A 24” DEEP CONTINUOUS ROOT CONTROL BARRIER PANEL. "ENCIRCLING" APPLICATIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.

2. FLEXIBLE ROOT BARRIER: INSTALL FLEXIBLE ROOT BARRIER WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE

SEWER MAIN LINES OR LATERALS, APPLICABLE TO ANY TREES OR SHRUBS PLANTED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA.

ROOT BARRIER NOTES
N 00°41'23" W
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY)
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
[435 BM 2]
LOT 35

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[435 BM 2]
LOT Y
[435 BM 2]
LOT 37
[435 BM 2]
LOT 38
[435 BM 2]
LOT 39
[435 BM 2]
LOT 40
[435 BM 2]
LOT 41
[435 BM 2]
LOT N
[435 BM 2]
LOT T
[435 BM 2]
LOT 93
[435 BM 2]
LOT 94
[435 BM 2]
LOT S

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND BD MON

IN MON WELL
"LS 5161"
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd sd sdss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe oe
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W
12" SD
10" SS 10" SS
12" W
10" SS
60" SD 24" SD
12" SD
S S S
D D
D
D D
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
N 00°41'23" W
N 89°33'33" E
N 00°41'23" W 244.00'

25.00' 25.00'
363.03'

25.00' 25.00'
244.00'
365.50'
512.20'
N 89°33'33" E 96.50'
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
SS
SS
SS
W
W
S S
D
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< <
< < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < <
< < <
D D
1 LOT G
LOT C

LOT E LOT H
LOT G
2 3
4 5
6 7 13 12 11 10 9 8 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
28 27
26 25
29 30
31 32

LOT B LOT D LOT A
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 1
DATE: 09/15/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: GS

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N

GARBAGE , MIXED RECYCLE, AND ORGANICS
CONTAINERS OVERALL DIMENSIONS 87" W X
35" D (UP TO 8' AVAILABLE IF REQUIRED)

SOLID WASTE KEY
HINO 338 M + WAYNE ROYAL GT14 REFUSE
TRUCK

27.883'

8.042'
N 00°41'23" W
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY)
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
[435 BM 2]
LOT 35

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[435 BM 2]
LOT Y
[435 BM 2]
LOT 37
[435 BM 2]
LOT 38
[435 BM 2]
LOT 39
[435 BM 2]
LOT 40
[435 BM 2]
LOT 41
[435 BM 2]
LOT N
[435 BM 2]
LOT T
[435 BM 2]
LOT 93
[435 BM 2]
LOT 94
[435 BM 2]
LOT S

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND BD MON

IN MON WELL
"LS 5161"
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd sd sdss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe oe
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W
12" SD
10" SS 10" SS
12" W
10" SS
60" SD 24" SD
12" SD
S S S
D D
D
D D
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
N 00°41'23" W
N 89°33'33" E
N 00°41'23" W 244.00'

25.00' 25.00'
363.03'

25.00' 25.00'
244.00'
365.50'
512.20'
N 89°33'33" E 96.50'
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
SS
SS
SS
W
W
S S
D
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< <
< < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < <
< < <
D D
1 LOT G
LOT C

LOT E LOT H
LOT G
2 3
4 5
6 7 13 12 11 10 9 8 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
28 27
26 25
29 30
31 32

LOT B LOT D LOT A
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 2
DATE: 09/15/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: GS

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N

GARBAGE , MIXED RECYCLE, AND ORGANICS
CONTAINERS OVERALL DIMENSIONS 87" W X
35" D (UP TO 8' AVAILABLE IF REQUIRED)

SOLID WASTE KEY
HINO 338 M + WAYNE ROYAL GT14 REFUSE
TRUCK

27.883'

8.042'
N 00°41'23" W
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY)
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
[435 BM 2]
LOT 35

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[435 BM 2]
LOT Y
[435 BM 2]
LOT 37
[435 BM 2]
LOT 38
[435 BM 2]
LOT 39
[435 BM 2]
LOT 40
[435 BM 2]
LOT 41
[435 BM 2]
LOT N
[435 BM 2]
LOT T
[435 BM 2]
LOT 93
[435 BM 2]
LOT 94
[435 BM 2]
LOT S

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND REBAR/CAP
"LS 5161"

FND BD MON

IN MON WELL
"LS 5161"
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd sd sdss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe oe
oe
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W
12" SD
10" SS 10" SS
12" W
10" SS
60" SD 24" SD
12" SD
S S S
D D
D
D D
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
N 00°41'23" W
N 89°33'33" E
N 00°41'23" W 244.00'

25.00' 25.00'
363.03'

25.00' 25.00'
244.00'
365.50'
512.20'
N 89°33'33" E 96.50'
N 89°33'33" E 363.03'
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
SS
SS
SS
W
W
S S
D
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< <
< < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < <
< < <
D D
1 LOT G
LOT C

LOT E LOT H
LOT G
2 3
4 5
6 7 13 12 11 10 9 8 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
28 27
26 25
29 30
31 32

LOT B LOT D LOT A
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
DIAMETER = 84'
MINIMUM DIAMETER = 62'
PREFERRED LOT 14 CONTAINERS LOCATION PREFERRED LOT 7 CONTAINERS LOCATION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 3
DATE: 09/15/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: GS

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N

GARBAGE , MIXED RECYCLE, AND ORGANICS
CONTAINERS OVERALL DIMENSIONS 87" W X
35" D (UP TO 8' AVAILABLE IF REQUIRED)

SOLID WASTE KEY
HINO 338 M + WAYNE ROYAL GT14 REFUSE
TRUCK

27.883'

8.042'

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT N

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
S S
D D
D
D

TANZANITE AVENUE (PUBLIC)

AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEYPRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
C5.0

SITE PHOTOS
0'
SCALE:
20' 40' 80'
1"=40'
N
1 NORTHWEST 2 NORTH 4 NORTHEAST
10 WEST 5 EAST
9 SOUTHWEST 6 SOUTHEAST
3 NORTH
8 SOUTH 7 SOUTH
2 10
3 4
5 8
7 9
6 1

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT N

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
S S
D D
D
D

TANZANITE AVENUE (PUBLIC)

AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEYPRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
C5.1

SITE PHOTOS
0'
SCALE:
20' 40' 80'
1"=40'
N
1 NORTHWEST 2 NORTH 4 NORTHEAST
10 WEST 5 EAST
9 SOUTHWEST 6 SOUTHEAST
3 NORTH
8 SOUTH 7 SOUTH
3 4
5 1
2 10
9 8 7 6
September 5, 2025
Sacramento, CA
R&C PN: 25034A L2 Enclave at Airport Road Preliminary Construction Details

HORIZONTAL WOOD FENCE
3/4" = 1'-0" SECTION/ELEVATION
8'-0" U.N.O.
±2" CLR.
8'-0" O.C. MAX
NOTES
A. ALL FASTENERS SHALL

BE HOT DIPPED,

ZINC-COATED

GALVANIZED PER CRC
317.3.1.

B. ALL WOOD SHALL BE

REDWOOD, DOUGLAS

FIR, OR WESTERN RED
CEDAR, #2 OR BETTER,
U.N.O.

C. STEP FENCE AT POSTS
ONLY. ALL BOARDS
SHALL BE LEVEL.

FINISH GRADE,
TYP
1X6 X 16' BOARDS,

ALTERNATE SPLICES
BETWEEN ROWS; SPLICE

ONLY AT POSTS
2X4 CENTER

SUPPORT

BETWEEN POSTS
4X4 PT POST, TYP.
2 X 6 CAP, MITER
CORNERS, 3/4"

OVERHANG TO

OUTSIDE

CONCRETE

FOOTING PER
ASTM F537, SLOPE

TOP FOR POSITIVE

DRAINAGE AWAY

FROM POST

FASTNERS

ALIGNED AT EACH

SUPPORT
1/2" GAP, TYP.
5-1/2" TYP
1 8'-0" O.C. MAX

SPACE EVENLY

ELEVATION
PLAN
(CAP OMITTED

FOR CLARITY)

SECTION
6'-0"
2" CLR.

ALTERNATE RAIL SIDE AT EACH PANEL
2"
A. ALL FASTENERS SHALL

BE HOT-DIPPED,

ZINC-COATED

GALVANIZED PER CRC
317.3.1.

B. ALL WOOD SHALL BE

DOUGLAS FIR OR

WESTERN RED CEDAR,
#2 OR BETTER.

C. STEP FENCE AT
POSTS. FOR GRADES
1:6 (17%) OR GREATER,

SLOPE PANELS WITH
GRADE.
2 X 6 CAP, CENTER ALL

JOINTS ON POSTS
2 X 4 RAIL, TYP.
1 X 6 FENCE BOARDS
4 X 4 POST,

PRESERVATIVE-TREATED
WOOD PER CRC 317.1.

CONCRETE FOOTING PER ASTM
F537, SLOPE TOP FOR POSITIVE

DRAINAGE AWAY FROM POST

FINISH GRADE
1 X 4 TRIM, TYP. (TOP AND BOTTOM) 2 X 4 RAIL, TYP.
2" CLR.

GOOD NEIGHBOR FENCE
3/4" = 1'-0" AS NOTED 2

PRECAST FENCE SYSTEM
NOT TO SCALE AS NOTED 3
PROPOSED MATERIALS ARE INCLUDED AS "BASIS
OF DESIGN" AND SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXHIBIT C

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
I. PURPOSE AND INTENT
The definitions applicable to the body of the Agreement shall apply to this Exhibit C.

In order to achieve its objectives, and in order to obtain from each LANDOWNER and developer, all required contributions, fees, land transfers, agreements, and other mechanisms required to implement its terms, the NNCP provides that all rezoning and development shall occur through the planned unit development process. Development agreements should be entered into with LANDOWNERS whenever feasible under the circumstances.

Under no circumstances can development of the Property proceed without satisfaction of the conditions specified in this exhibit. These Special Conditions shall constitute binding and legally enforceable obligations of LANDOWNER and its successors and assigns, and binding and legally enforceable requirements and conditions for the development of the Property, in addition to other obligations, requirements and conditions imposed during the rezoning, special permit, subdivision map and other land use entitlement processes.

II. LANDOWNERS’ OBLIGATIONS
A. Mitigation Monitoring; Habitat Conservation Plan.

1. Mitigation Monitoring. When required in order to obtain entitlements, LANDOWNER shall execute a mitigation monitoring agreement, and such other agreements as may be necessary in CITY’s judgment in order to implement any mitigation measure relating to the NNCP and any mitigation monitoring plans applicable to the Property, and shall fully cooperate with CITY in implementing any mitigation monitoring plan adopted as part of the approval process for development of the Property.

2. Habitat Conservation Plan.
a. In the event that a Habitat Conservation Plan has been adopted by CITY, LANDOWNER shall be obligated to undertake and exercise one of the following options:
(i) participate in that Plan by payment of the fees applicable to LANDOWNER and/or the Property or provide required proportionate land dedications, at the time specified in the Plan for payment of fees or dedication of required proportionate lands; or
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
(ii) obtain and present to CITY a duly issued, executed and effective incidental take permit issued by federal and state agencies charged with implementation of the provisions of federal and state Endangered Species Acts, which would allow development of the Property; or (iii) obtain and present to CITY a duly issued, executed, and effective form of document from said federal and state agencies that development of the Property may proceed without the need for an incidental take permit; or
(iv) participate in such other plan or program which has been approved by said federal and state agencies; or
(v) take any other action required by CITY in its sole discretion, relating to satisfaction of all applicable laws, including but not limited to CEQA and the federal and state Endangered Species Acts, where none of the provisions of subsections (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) are applicable. b. The Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan Fee is payable by Landowner at the time of and as a condition of issuance of a grading or building permit. The fee is, at the time of execution of this Agreement, the sum of $47,031 per acre of the Property subject to the grading or building permit. In addition to the payment of that sum, Landowner shall be subject to the provisions of any “catch-up fee” ordinance, resolution, rule or regulation in effect at the time of issuance of the grading or building permit. The requirement specified in this subsection 2b shall be included in each entitlement issued with respect to the Property. Landowner understands and agrees that the provisions of Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, as those sections are amended, renumbered or reconstituted, shall not apply to the fees covered by this subsection 2b.

B. Agreements with Other Agencies. As required by CITY, LANDOWNER shall enter into agreements with other affected agencies, including but not limited to:

1. Appropriate sanitation districts, including but not limited to Sacramento County Regional Sanitation District, for provision of facilities, payment of fees and charges, and payment (if applicable) of any proportionate share of penalties imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and

2. Reclamation District 1000, if in CITY’s sole and exclusive discretion and judgment such an agreement is in fact required, or any other agreement which is required in CITY’s sole and exclusive discretion and judgment for the implementation of Interim Drainage or the Drainage Plan.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
C. Drainage Sub-basin Agreement. LANDOWNER shall enter into an agreement with each of the other landowners within the Drainage Sub-basin within which the Property lies, which provides the manner in which the Infrastructure required for development of all of the lands within said Drainage Sub-basin shall be constructed and financed. As an alternative form of compliance with this provision, LANDOWNER may enter into an agreement with CITY, satisfactory to the City Attorney, which provides that LANDOWNER shall finance all costs associated with the Infrastructure required for development of all of the undeveloped lands within said Drainage Sub-basin. Any such agreement shall additionally provide for reimbursement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, and the North Natomas Finance Plan, for LANDOWNER’s payment of Infrastructure costs in excess of or beyond those required for development of the Property, as that term is defined in Section 8 of this Agreement. As a further alternative, CITY may impose a Drainage Subbasin assessment district for purposes of financing the required Infrastructure. The provisions of subsection 6D of this Agreement shall apply in such a case.

D. Inclusionary Housing Requirements. CITY has enacted a mixed income housing policy (“Policy”), as set forth in title 17, chapter 17.190 of the Sacramento City Code. If and to the extent that the Property is subject to the Policy, certain project entitlements for the Property will contain conditions which implement the Policy, including but not limited to conditions requiring an inclusionary housing plan (“IHP”) and an inclusionary housing agreement (“IHA”). The IHP for the property, where the Policy is applicable, is attached to this Exhibit C as Exhibit C-1, and incorporated herein by this reference. The requirements specified in the IHP shall be implemented by LANDOWNER, and LANDOWNER shall execute the required IHP.

III. CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT; SPECIAL FINDINGS REQUIRED A. In addition to other findings and conditions as may be deemed applicable, no special permit, subdivision map or other land use entitlement for the Property shall be approved unless the approving body either: (1) makes the following findings; or (2) expressly waives such findings, in whole or in part, as not applicable to the Property and stating the reasons therefor with such waiver and the reasons therefor appear in the record or document of approval. These findings are:

1. The approval of the proposed project is consistent with the policies, goals, standards and objectives of the NNCP and other relevant factors and circumstances, including but not limited to:
a. The adequacy of the required interim and permanent Infrastructure needed to support the project planned for the Property;
b. The extent of participation required of LANDOWNER under the North Natomas Finance Plan has been secured;
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
c. The extent to which LANDOWNER has complied with the provisions of the NNLAP.
d. The extent to which LANDOWNER has complied with the provisions of the Policy.

2. The North Natomas Finance Plan has been adopted by the City Council.

3. All transfers of land, owned by or under the control of LANDOWNER, which are specified in the NNLAP as being necessary for public purposes, have been transferred to CITY or to the appropriate public agency. For this purpose, a transfer will be deemed to occur upon delivery to CITY of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication in form and manner approved by the City Department of Public Works and the City Attorney. These dedications include, but are not limited to streets, utilities, drainage facilities and public transit.

4. LANDOWNER has, where applicable, demonstrated that the proposed project as designed meets or exceeds the jobs to housing ratio of the NNCP, either actually or through the medium of the Housing Trust Fund, or through assisting housing starts in North Sacramento, or a combination thereof.

5. LANDOWNER has entered into all agreements required pursuant to sections IIA, IIB, and II.C above.

6. Appropriate environmental review of the proposed project has been completed, and any suggested mitigation measures resulting therefrom have been included in the approval of the project to the extent feasible.

B. In the event that any of the special findings required herein cannot be made and are not waived, approval may nevertheless be given to the proposed project if all of the following conditions can be satisfied with respect to each such special finding not made:

1. Practicable and feasible requirements or mitigation measures can be imposed upon the project, the implementation of which would allow such special finding to be made;

2. The applicant has agreed to be bound (through written agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney) by and to implement such requirements or mitigation measures, and has posted such security for compliance therewith as may be required by the City Manager; and

3. It is in the public interest and consistent with the policies, goals, standards and objectives of the Community Plan for the project to be approved with such requirements and mitigation measures.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXHIBIT D

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (herein “this Agreement”) is entered into this ____ day of ___________, 20[ ], by and between _________________ (herein “LANDOWNER”) and _________________ (herein “ASSIGNEE”).

RECITALS
A. LANDOWNER has entered into a Development Agreement (herein “the Development Agreement”) dated __________________, with the City of Sacramento, pursuant to which LANDOWNER agreed to develop certain property more particularly described in the Development Agreement (herein “the Property”) in the North Natomas Community Plan Area subject to certain conditions and obligations set forth in the Development Agreement.

B. LANDOWNER has assigned its interests under the Development Agreement to ASSIGNEE under a written agreement dated __________________, as to that portion of the Property identified and incorporated herein by this reference (herein the “Assigned Parcel(s)”).

C. ASSIGNEE desires to assume all of LANDOWNER’s rights and obligations and other terms and conditions under the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel(s).

AGREEMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, LANDOWNER AND ASSIGNEE HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. ASSIGNEE hereby assumes all of the burdens and obligations of LANDOWNER under the Development Agreement, and agrees to observe and fully perform all of the duties and obligations of LANDOWNER under the Development Agreement, and to be subject to all of the terms and conditions thereof, with respect to the Assigned Parcel(s), it being the express intention of both LANDOWNER and ASSIGNEE that, upon the execution of this Agreement, ASSIGNEE shall become substituted for LANDOWNER as the “LANDOWNER” under the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel(s).

2. ASSIGNEE understands and agrees that this Agreement is subject to section 4 of the Development Agreement. Section 4 reads as follows:

Assignment. LANDOWNER shall have the right to sell, assign, or transfer its interests under this Agreement as part of a contemporaneous and related sale, assignment or transfer of its interests in the Property, or any portion thereof, without the consent of CITY; provided, however, that LANDOWNER shall notify CITY of such sale, assignment or transfer by providing written notice thereof to CITY in the manner provided in this Agreement. LANDOWNER shall remain North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
obligated to perform all terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless such purchaser, assignee or transferee, to the satisfaction of and in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, executes and delivers to CITY an express agreement to assume all of the obligations and other terms and conditions of this Agreement with respect to the Property or such portion thereof sold, assigned or transferred. The execution of such an assumption agreement shall relieve LANDOWNER of the obligations expressly assumed only if (a) LANDOWNER is not in default under this Agreement at the time of the assignment or transfer; and (b) LANDOWNER has provided CITY with notice of said assignment or transfer in the manner provided hereunder. Any such assumption agreement with respect to LANDOWNER’s obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be to the satisfaction of the City Attorney if executed in the form of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference, or such other form as shall be proposed by LANDOWNER and approved by the City Attorney prior to the effective date of the assignment.

Any purchaser, assignee, or transferee shall be obligated and bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and shall be the beneficiary thereof and a party thereto, only with respect to the Property, or such portion thereof, sold, assigned, or transferred to it. Any such purchaser, assignee, or transferee shall observe and fully perform all of the duties and obligations of LANDOWNER under this Agreement, as such duties and obligations pertain to the portion of the Property sold, assigned, or transferred.

4. At the request of the City, ASSIGNEE agrees to enter into a separate development agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel(s).

5. All of the covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective heirs, successors and assigns.

6. ASSIGNEE agrees that it has read, and has sought and received all required legal and other expert consultation with regard to the Development Agreement, and fully understands all of its terms and conditions. ASSIGNEE further agrees that: (i) LANDOWNER has furnished ASSIGNEE with a copy of the North Natomas Community Plan, the Comprehensive Drainage Plan, the North Natomas Finance Plan, the RD-1000 Agreement (where applicable), the Habitat Conservation Plan, and all other documents and materials containing or relating to terms and conditions of development in the NNCP area; (ii) ASSIGNEE has read and understands all of the terms and conditions of said documents and materials; and (iii) with such knowledge and understanding, which includes the nature and extent of the fees, taxes, assessments and other financial mechanisms and obligations inherent in such documents and materials, nevertheless has voluntarily, freely and knowingly assumed and agreed to perform all of obligations and requirements, and be bound by all of the provisions of such documents and materials.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.

By: ______________________________
“ASSIGNEE”
North Natomas Development Agreement Exhibits
form revised 12/20/02 (jpc revision)

EXHIBIT E

NORTH NATOMAS LAND

ACQUISITION PROGRAM
(NNLAP)
ATTACHED:

EXHIBIT E-1
Excerpt from the Final North Natomas Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Financing Plan 2017 Update (adopted by Resolution No. 2018-0058 on February 6, 2018). The excerpt consists of pages 62 through 74 from Part 6, which is titled “North Natomas Land Acquisition Fees”; and Appendix F, titled “Land Acquisition Program Support Tables,” consisting of pages F-1 through F-6.

EXHIBIT E-2
Excerpt from the North Natomas Final Nexus Study and Financing Plan 2008 Update (approved by Resolution No. 2009-341 on May 26, 2009). The excerpt consists of pages 6-1 through 6-7 and 6-9 through 6-14 from Part 6, which is titled “North Natomas Land Acquisition Fees”; and Appendix E, titled “Land Acquisition Program Support Tables,” consisting of pages E-1 through E-5.

EXHIBIT E-3
Excerpt from the Hearing Report for the NNLAP 2005 Update dated May 9, 2009. The excerpt consists of the following 11 pages from Part I, which is titled “North Natomas Public Facilities Land Acquisition Fee”: Title Page, Table of Contents, List of Maps and Tables, Pages I-3 and I-4, Map of LAP Reimbursement Areas (rev. August 2002), Page I-6, Table 2, Table 3, Page I-9, Table 4.

EXHIBIT E-4
Excerpt from the North Natomas Nexus Study 2002 Update dated August 7, 2002. The excerpt consists of the following 12 pages from Part I, which is titled “North Natomas Land Acquisition Fees”:

Pages VI-1 and VI-2, Map of LAP Reimbursement Areas (rev. August 2002), Pages VI-5 through VI-13.

EXHIBIT E-5
Excerpt from the North Natomas Financing Plan 1999 Update (dated August 17, 1999). The excerpt consists of the following 15 pages from the section titled “Public Land Acquired Through the NNLAP”: Page V-3, Pages V-5 through V-17, Page V-19.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
1 EXHIBIT F
Protest Waiver Provisions Agreed to by LANDOWNER
LANDOWNER understands and agrees that financing of the Infrastructure, public improvements and facilities (including the land covered by the NNLAP) and other programs required under the NNCP will be accomplished through a variety of financing mechanisms, including but not limited to a combination of special assessment districts, tax districts (such as Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts) and developer fees, all of which mechanisms are designed to spread the cost of those items in accordance with benefit and other methodologies. LANDOWNER further understands and agrees that an important component of this Agreement is LANDOWNER’s advance consent to the formation of, or implementation of any such district or imposition of any such fee, and LANDOWNER’s agreement not to protest or contest such formation, implementation or fee imposition.

Accordingly, LANDOWNER agrees for itself, its constituents, successors and assigns that it fully, finally and forever waives and relinquishes any right it may have to protest or contest the formation or implementation of any special assessment or tax district or any similar form of financing mechanism, or any combination thereof, together with any rights it may have to contest the imposition of any developer fee established or imposed pursuant to the North Natomas Finance Plan.

Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall prevent LANDOWNER from presenting CITY any information or opinions regarding any financing mechanism CITY may from time to time consider establishing or imposing, which information or opinions relate to the dollar amount of any fees, assessments, taxes or other charges imposed by CITY pursuant to the North Natomas Finance Plan, or which information or opinions relate to the question of consistency of the financing mechanism with the North Natomas Finance Plan. If a financing mechanism is proposed for adoption by CITY, which mechanism both: (i) directly and significantly conflicts with the language and the intent of the North Natomas Finance Plan, as amended; and (ii) directly and significantly conflicts with the North Natomas Nexus Study adopted by the City Council in connection with establishment of development fees for the North Natomas Finance Plan Area, LANDOWNER shall have the right to protest only the actual amount of the directly and significantly conflicting proposed fee, charge, special tax, or assessment proposed to be levied, charged, assessed or taxed against the Property by virtue of the proposed financing mechanism. Provided, however, that LANDOWNER’s said right to protest, together with any right to object, shall be waived unless LANDOWNER’s protest of objection is made at or before the time of the public hearing wherein the proposed financing mechanism, together with the fee, charge, special tax or assessment is established by the City Council. LANDOWNER’s right to judicial challenge of any such mechanism, and the fees, charges, assessments or special taxes imposed or to be imposed in connection therewith, shall be limited to review of the decision of the City Council establishing the said mechanism and the said fees, charges, assessments or special taxes; LANDOWNER shall not have the right, in connection with any land use entitlement proceeding with respect to the Property, to judicially challenge the financing mechanism or the fees, charges, assessments or special taxes as applied to the Property, and waives any statutory or common law right to pay such fees, charges, assessment or special taxes under protest. For purposes of this Agreement, “fees, charges, assessments or special taxes” shall include any monetary exaction or payment required to be paid by LANDOWNER by virtue of or relating to development of the Property.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
2 Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, LANDOWNER for itself, its constituents, successors and assignees specifically, as to the Property, agrees to the following which are adopted by the City Council pursuant to the North Natomas Finance Plan:
(1) Waives, and hereby grants advance consent to the formation and implementation of any and all special assessment districts, tax districts (such as Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts), fee districts or other financing mechanisms of a similar nature recommended or established by CITY for the purpose of financing Infrastructure, public improvements and facilities (including land transfers as set forth in the NNLAP). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, LANDOWNER specifically waives:
(i) the provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 (division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code, beginning at section 2800), together with associated provisions of the California Constitution; (ii) the provisions of any other statute designed to provide a protest or contest procedure in connection with formation and implementation of a district or similar financing mechanism; and
(iii) the provisions of any procedure embodied in the Sacramento City Code designed to provide a protest or contest procedure in connection with formation and implementation of a district or similar financing mechanism. (2) Waives, and hereby grants advance consent to the formation and implementation of any and all special fees, exactions, development fees, assessments, taxes or other charges established by CITY for the purpose of financing Infrastructure, public improvements and facilities (including land transfers as set forth in the NNLAP). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, LANDOWNER specifically waives:
(i) to the extent applicable, those statutory and constitutional provisions specified in paragraph (1) above; and
(ii) the provisions of Government Code section 66000 et seq. or any other provision of law providing a procedure for contest or protest of establishment or imposition of special fees, exactions, development fees, assessments, taxes or other charges of a similar nature.
(3) Agrees to:
(i) affirmatively petition CITY, where applicable, for the formation of all special districts and other financing mechanisms that have been or will be in the future selected or recommended by CITY in order to implement the North Natomas Finance Plan; (ii) execute an irrevocable proxy or proxies when necessary (such as in the formation of, or imposition of taxes relative to, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District) North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits
3 authorizing a representative designated by CITY, who will vote in favor of establishing the specific financing mechanism in question; and (iii) execute immediately upon presentation any document which is required or convenient for the formation of the district or facilitation of the particular financing mechanism.

LANDOWNER agrees and specifically represents to CITY that it is fully aware of all of its legal rights relative to the waivers, advance consents and other agreements set forth herein, having been fully advised by its own independent attorneys. Having such knowledge and understanding of its rights, LANDOWNER has nevertheless voluntarily entered into this Agreement, of which this Exhibit is a material part. LANDOWNER is aware that CITY is relying on the representations contained in this Exhibit in entering into this Agreement.

North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17 JCH&JPC Exhibits

EXHIBIT G

IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION FORM
Recorded for the benefit of the
City of Sacramento (exempt from
fees under Gov. Code, § 6103)
When recorded return to–
Development Services Department
Attn: Jerry Lovato
300 Richards Blvd., 3rd Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811

IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
The undersigned hereby certifies that we are the legal owners of, or are parties having an interest in, the hereinafter-described real property; and the undersigned, for themselves and their heirs, successors, and assigns, do hereby irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Sacramento, a municipal corporation, [in fee title] [an easement for public road and public utilities on, under, over, and across] the hereinafterdescribed real property located in the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of California, described as follows:

SEE EXHIBIT “A,” LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND EXHIBIT “B,” PLAT, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.

Reserving, however, unto the undersigned and their heirs, successors, and assigns any and all present lawful uses of the above-described real property until such time as the City Engineer of the City of Sacramento gives written notice that the above-described real property will be improved for public purposes; and it is also hereby understood and agreed by the undersigned and their heirs, successors, and assigns that any improvements hereinafter placed by them in or upon the above-described real property shall be removed without cost or expense to the City of Sacramento. Until such notice is given by the City Engineer, the undersigned and their heirs, successors, and assigns agree to assume full responsibility or liability for any injury or damage to any person or property on the above-described real property or arising out of its use or occupancy by them. It is also hereby understood that all work to be done in or upon the above-described real property shall be done under permit and done in accordance with plans to be furnished by the principal and approved by the City Engineer of the City of Sacramento, and in accordance with the specifications of the City Engineer of the City of Sacramento.

The dedication offered hereunder shall be complete upon its acceptance by the City Engineer of the City of Sacramento.

Witness ______ hand this _______ day of ___________, 20[ ] By: _________________________ By: _________________________ (ATTACH NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT)
North Natomas Development Agreement
Form Revised 10/03/17

JCH&JPC
Exhibits

EXHIBIT H

MAP AND CATEGORICAL LISTING

OF LAND AND INFRASTRUCTURE

SEE ATTACHED

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59
[435 BM 2]
LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
12" SD
24" SD
12" SD
S S
S
D D
D
D
D D
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]
D
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < <
< < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < <
< < < <
< <
SD

SD SD SD
SD
D D SD
SD

SD SD SD
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 2.1% 2.1%

2.4% 2.1%

2.0%

2.2%

2.1%

2.2%

2.7%

2.0%

2.2% 2.2%

2.0%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0% 2.0%

2.2%

2.2%

3.6%

3.6%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1%

2.3%

2.5%

2.0%

2.1%

6.7%

4.2%

2.5%

3.7%

2.5%

5.2%

2.1%

2.1%

6.7% 1.6%

3.7%

1.2%

2.1%
20' EVA 20' EVA 20' EVA
10'
10'
10'
(17.67)S (18.01)S (17.90)S (17.76)S (17.66)S (17.78)S (17.83)S (17.83)S (17.67)S (17.13)S (16.81)S
(17.12)S
(15.81)S
(16.84)S
(16.75)S
(16.78)S
(17.09)S
(17.48)S
(17.24)S

17.22C
(17.19)S
(17.06)S
(17.04)S
(16.83)S
(16.80)S
(16.49)P
(16.79)S
(16.19)P
(16.30)S (15.95)C
(15.54)P
(15.24)C
(14.87)P
(16.06)FL (15.29)FL (16.28)FL
FF=17.65

16.17P 16.17P 15.62P 15.62P

15.34RIM 14.89RIM

15.40GR

15.48GR

15.20GR

15.40GR 15.30GR

15.59FL

16.77P 16.83P 16.66P 16.57P 16.63P

16.21P

15.66P

15.56P

15.02P

16.16P

15.89P

15.73P

15.80P 15.80P

15.79P

15.78P

15.54P

15.66P

16.52FL

16.44P

16.52C 16.47C

15.87P

15.87C

15.69P

15.80P

15.49P
FF=17.70
FF=17.62
FF=17.84
FF=17.60
FF=17.43
FF=17.68
FF=17.68
FF=17.45
FF=17.62
FF=17.75 FF=18.05
FF=17.70
FF=17.44
FF=17.68 FF=17.67
FF=17.43
FF=17.68
FF=18.34
FF=17.66
FF=17.43
FF=17.60
FF=17.70
FF=17.62
FF=17.84
FF=18.07 FF=18.17 FF=18.03 FF=18.05 FF=18.10 FF=18.10 FF=18.04

15.50RIM

15.83RIM

15.95RIM

16.43P

16.86P

15.85P

15.92FL

16.23FL/HP

15.79FL

15.74RIM

15.57FL

15.74FL

15.45FL

16.24C

16.35C
(17.21)S
(17.17)S

17.12C

15.80C

16.13C

15.42C

16.44P

15.56FL

14.86FL

16.06TC

14.94TC

15.35TC

14.85FL

15.38RIM
17 17
17 171718
17 17
17 17
17 17
17 16
17 18
17 17
17 167
17 16
17 18
17 16
17 17
17 17
17 17
16 16
16 16
16 17
17 17 17
16 1717
17 16
17 17
1717
17 16
16 17
16 16
2 2
4 4
4 3
2 1
1 4
2 2
4 5
6 TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 7 TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 3 TYP. 7
TYP. 3 TYP. 7
TYP. 7 TYP. 3
EXISTING12.5' PUE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE
EXISTING12.5' PUE

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

16.79P

2.2%

15.96P

15.63P

15.59P

15.48P

15.44P

15.54P

15.60P

15.78P

15.84P

16.52P

15.91P 16.54C

16.59C

16.58C

16.62P

14.88FL

14.96TC

15.10P
(16.29)P
(16.50)P (16.46)P
(16.42)P (16.39)P
(16.38)P
(15.51)P
(15.72)P
(15.69)P
(15.46)P (15.40)P
(15.64)P
(15.62)P
(15.40)P
(15.15)P
(15.23)P(15.18)P
(15.11)P
(15.02)P
(15.21)P
(15.16)P
(15.16)P
(15.14)P
(15.14)P
(15.11)P
(15.05)P
(14.97)P
(15.09)P
(14.88)P
(14.96)P
(15.00)P

15.90RIM

16.39C

2.1%

2.2%

2.3%
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G

2.2% 2.2%
20'
EVA
(14.58)FL
4'
4 C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
EXISTING 1-FT CONTOUR
EXISTING 5-FT CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1-FT CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5-FT CONTOUR

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED EASEMENT

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED SWALE FLOWLINE

PROPOSED DRAIN INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

DIRECTION OF GUTTER FLOW

PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW

PROPOSED OVERLAND RELEASE POINT
GRADING LEGEND:
35 34
35 34
D

CONCRETE ELEVATION

FLOWLINE ELEVATION

PAVEMENT ELEVATION

RIM ELEVATION

GROUND ELEVATION

TOP OF CURB ELEVATION

BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION

PROPOSED GROUND SLOPE

EXISTING GROUND SLOPE

RIDGE LINE/ HIGH POINT
X.X%
(X.X%)
R R
FF=???
???C
???FL
???P
???RIM
???S
???TC

1. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS (FFE) ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

NOTES:
< < < <
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE/PARK (PERVIOUS AREA)

COMPOST AMENDED SOIL (PERVIOUS AREA)

PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
PROPOSED LOT AREA: 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA: 48,846 SF/ 1.12 AC (55%)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 39,401 SF/0.91 AC (45%)*
 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS IS LESS THAN 73.5% (SEE BASIN 6 - CONVERSION OF SSWMM TO XPSWMM DRAINAGE MODEL, AT NODES 162 AND 163 IN WATERSHED W-162 AND W-163, FOR REFERENCE); THEREFORE NO ADDITIONAL

DETENTION MITIGATION IS REQUIRED
PARCEL AREA(S):

SD
C2.0

PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
PRELIMINARY STORM DRAIN KEYNOTES:

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET.

PROPOSED PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE. SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT.

CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO NEW PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA DRAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 D

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

UMMER DAY LANE
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59
[435 BM 2]
LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W
12" SD
10" SS 10" SS
24" SD
12" SD
S S S
S S
D D
D
D
D D
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]

12.5' PUE

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
SS
SS
SS
W
W
S S
D
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
W
W
W
W

JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
D D
M
W
SS
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
W

M M M M M
M
M
M
M
M
W
SS
SS
W
SS
W
SS
W
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 3
2 2
2 2
5 5 5
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 6 5
5 3
3 3
2 4
3 3
2 5 5
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
6 4 4
TYP. 1
TYP. 1 TYP. 1
TYP. 1 TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 3
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1 TYP. 1
TYP. 1
6 6

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY
7 TYP. 1
4 4
4 4
LOT H

LOT A LOT B
LOT C
LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
C3.0

PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
LEGEND

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE

PROPOSED WATER LINE

PROPOSED JOINT TRENCH

PROPERTY SETBACK

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

PROPOSED BLOW-OFF VALVE

PROPOSED GATE VALVE

PROPOSED WATER METER

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED RP/DCDA

PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (PUBLIC ROAD)

PROPOSED OFFSITE CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED OFFSITE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
ss ss
sd sd
w w

SS SS SS
W W
S
JT JT
W
g g
e e
CONCEPTUAL UTILITY NOTES:

1. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANG PENDING FURTHER DESIGN COORDINATION.

M
SS
SD
oe oe
W

PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER KEYNOTE
PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT AND LATERAL STUB.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT.

CONNECT TO PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.

CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
PRELIMINARY DRY UTILITY KEYNOTES:

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE BOX AND ELECTRICAL, PHONE, CABLE, AND JOINT TRENCH. LOCATION SHALL BE APPROV BY SMUD AND OTHER DRY UTILITY PURVEYORS.

EXISTING ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE TO BE RAISED TO GRADE.

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION TO MEET ALL SMUD REQUIREMENTS.

LOCATION SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SMUD.

EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURE TO REMAIN.

EXISTING STREETLIGHT TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS NEEDED.

EXISTING COMMUNICATION LINES, UTILITY POLE WITH GUY WIRE, AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES TO BE RELOCATED AS NEEDED.
1 2
3 4
5 6
PRELIMINARY WATER KEYNOTES:

PROPOSED 1" WATER SERVICE AND METER.

PROPOSED WATER LINE.

CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN.

PROPOSED GATE VALVE.

PROPOSED BLOW-OFF VALVE.

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RAISED TO GRADE.
1 2
3 4
5 6
S

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68
[435 BM 2]
LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36

GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59
[435 BM 2]
LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd
sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

NATURITA WAY
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION
24" SD
12" SD
60" SD 24" SD
12" SD
S S S
S S
D D
D
D
D D
50' I.O.D.

FOR PUBLIC ROAD
[185 PM 20]

12.5' P.U.E.
[185 PM 20]
D
SD

SD SD SD
SD
D D SD
SD

SD SD SD
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2% 2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0% 2.0%

2.0% 2.0%

2.1%

2.0%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.8%

3.6%

3.6%

2.2%

2.2%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1%

2.5%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.7%

2.7%
DMA 1

2.03 AC

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY

3.4%

3.4%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
C/s/> EE'/EEEZ/E' Θ WZK:ECd DAEA'EDEEd

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
C4.0

PRELIMINARY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVEMENT

PROPOSED COMPOST AMENDED SOIL

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP

DMA BOUNDARY
DMA XX DMA NO. AND AREA
X.XX AC
PRELIMINARY LID CALCULATIONS:
- OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS AREA CREDIT: 37.48 PTS - RUNOFF REDUCTION CREDIT: 16 PTS - RUNOFF MANAGEMENT CREDIT: 46.6 PTS TOTAL LID CREDITS: 100.5 PTS

IMPERVIOUS SURFACE INFORMATION
GROSS AREA: 2.03 ACRES (±88,578 SF)
NET AREA: 2.03 ACRES (±88,578 SF) [EXCLUDES PUBLIC ROW]

EXISTING ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS SURFACING
IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.28 ACRES - 14% OF NET
TOTAL EXISTING IMPERVIOUS ±0.28 ACRES - 14% OF NET

EXISTING ON-SITE PERVIOUS SURFACING
NATURAL GROUND AREA: ±1.75 ACRES - 86% OF NET
TOTAL EXISTING PERVIOUS ±1.75 ACRES - 86% OF NET

PROPOSED ON-SITE IMPERVIOUS SURFACING
PAVED/BUILDING AREA: ±0.91 ACRES - 45% O
TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ±0.91 ACRES - 45% OF NET

PROPOSED ON-SITE PERVIOUS SURFACING
LANDSCAPE AREA: ±0.60 ACRES - 30% OF NET
COMPOST AMENDED SOIL: ±0.05 ACRES - 2% OF NET
HOLLYWOOD STRIPS: ±0.03 ACRES - 1% OF NET
PERVIOUS PAVEMENT: ±0.44 ACRES - 22% OF NET
TOTAL PROPOSED PERVIOUS ±1.12 ACRES - 55% OF NET

PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE NOTES

1. DETENTION IS PROVIDED BY A REGIONAL DETENTION BASIN PER DRAINAGE REPORT CONVERSION OF SSWMM TO XPSWMM DRAINAGE MODEL" PREPARED BY WEST YOS ENGINEERED. PERCENT IMPERVIOUS IS LESS THAN 73.5% (AT NODES 162 AND 163 IN W-162 AND W-163, FOR REFERENCE); THEREFORE NO ADDITIONAL DETENTION MITI REQUIRED.

2. LID CREDITS WERE CALCULATED VIA THE RESIDENTIAL LID SPREADSHEET. 100 CREDIT

ACHIEVED VIA PERVIOUS PAVEMENT, INTERCEPTOR TREES, COMPOST AMENDED SO DETENTION BASIN/LANDSCAPE AREA CREDITS FOR A TOTAL OF 100.5 LID CREDITS. IM IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WAS EXCLUDED FROM LID CALCULATIONS.

ORDINANCE NO. 2026-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
February 24, 2026
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE SACRAMENTO CITY CODE BY REZONING 2.03± GROSS ACRES FROM THE SINGLE-UNIT DWELLING OR DUPLEX DWELLING (R-1A) ZONE TO THE SINGLE-UNIT DWELLING OR DUPLEX DWELLING AND NATOMAS CROSSING 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (R-1A-PUD) ZONE AT 3600 AIRPORT ROAD (APN: 225-0150-055-0000) (P25-010) BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO:

Section 1.

As used in this ordinance, “Property” means the real property depicted in attached and incorporated in Exhibit A and contains one APN.

Section 2.

Title 17 of the Sacramento City Code (“Planning and Development Code”) is hereby amended by rezoning 2.03± gross acres from the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A) zone to the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling and Natomas Crossing 2 Planned Unit Development (R-1A-PUD) zone, as shown on Exhibit A.

Section 3.

As required by section 17.808.230.C.1.d of the Planning and Development Code, the City Council finds that the rezoning of the property by this ordinance is consistent with the General Plan, proposed use, and development standards, in that there is no change to the base zone and the proposed project complies with the use and density allowances of the Neighborhood General Plan designation of the R-1A-PUD zone. Furthermore, the project promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City by developing an underutilized site that maximizes existing infrastructure and positions residences within convenient walking distance to open space. The proposed rezone to the R-1A-PUD zoning designation is an appropriate pairing with the Neighborhood General Plan designation.

Section 4.

The City Clerk is hereby directed to amend the City’s official zoning maps to conform with this ordinance.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A: Rezone Exhibit (1 page) is part of this ordinance.

Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18] [344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68 [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT Y
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59 [435 BM 2] LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908] AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
EXISTING ZONING:

APN: 225-0150-055
R-1A-SINGLE FAMILY
AREA = 2.03 ACRES ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68 [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT Y
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59 [435 BM 2] LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O
O O O

O AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED ZONING:

APN: 225-0150-055
R-1A-PUD
AREA = 2.03 ACRES
C6.0

REZONE EXHIBIT
N

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/29/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
SCALE: 1"=30'
DRAWN BY: EM

EXISTING DESIGNATION PROPOSED DESIGNATION
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
February 24, 2026
AMENDING THE NATOMAS CROSSING AREA 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,

TO DEPICT THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE AND INCLUDE DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS FOR COMPACT, SMALL-LOT SINGLE-UNIT DWELLING
RESIDENTIAL USES (APN: 225-0150-055-0000) (P25-010)

BACKGROUND
A. On January 22, 2026, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve with conditions the Enclave at Airport Road project (P25-010), which includes amending the schematic plan to depict the proposed project site, and to include development standards for compact, small-lot single-unit dwelling residential uses.

B. On February 24, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given under Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010.A.2.b.1.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Enclave at Airport Road project, the City Council approves amendments to the Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development, attached as Exhibit A-B, based on the following findings of fact:

1. The amendment is consistent with the applicable general plan land use designation, use, and development standards; the goals, policies, and other provisions of the general plan; and any applicable specific plan or transit village in that the Neighborhood (N) General Plan land use designation is primarily comprised of residential uses, with some complementary neighborhood-serving commercial and public uses and is intended to maintain and enhance livability and sense of place. Residential development is an allowable use within the N designation and the proposed project will occupy an infill site that maximizes existing street and utility infrastructure.

2. The amendment promotes the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the city, in that the proposed use is compatible with surrounding residential uses and provides additional housing opportunities for the community.

3. The proposed amendments are consistent with the proposed zoning designation, Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD), in that single-unit residential uses are an allowed use in the zone.

Section 2. The Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development Schematic Plan is amended as shown in exhibit A, which is part of this resolution.

Section 3. Section IV.C.2.a. and b. of the planned unit development guidelines for the Natomas Crossing Planned Unit Development are amended to read as shown in exhibit B, which is a part of this resolution.

Table of Contents:

Exhibit A: Natomas Crossing 2 PUD Schematic Plan Exhibit Exhibit B: Natomas Crossing 2 PUD Guidelines Exhibit
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

C7.1
NATOMAS CROSSING AREA 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SCHEMATIC PLAN N

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/29/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
SCALE: NTS
DRAWN BY: EM

TANZANITE AVE AIRPORT ROAD

PROJECT
SITE
PROPOSED ADDITION TO NATOMAS CROSSING PUD AREA 2 BOUNDARY:

EXISTING NATOMAS CROSSING PUD AREA 2 BOUNDARY:

PROPOSED PROJECT SITE:

ARENA BLVD

TRUXEL ROAD

EXISTING PARCEL A
APN: 225-0150-055

RESIDENTIAL
AREA = 2.03 ACRES
NATOMAS CROSSING PUD AREA 2

NUCLA WAY

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY) AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE (PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

NATOMAS

CROSSING
PUD
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O
O
O

PROPOSED PARCEL A
APN: 225-0150-055
NATOMAS CROSSING AREA 2 PUD
AREA = 2.03 ACRES
NATOMAS CROSSING PUD AREA 2

NUCLA WAY

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY) AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE (PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

NATOMAS

CROSSING
PUD
C7.0
NATOMAS CROSSING AREA 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SCHEMATIC PLAN N

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/29/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
SCALE: 1"=40'
DRAWN BY: EM
NATOMAS CROSSING AREA 2 PUD BOUNDARY:

EXISTING DESIGNATION PROPOSED DESIGNATION
NATOMAS CROSSING PUD BOUNDARY:

ALLEGHANY PROPERTIES PUD GUIDELINES
Review and Approvals

Section IV.C.2.a. and b.:
a. Residential Building Placement and Orientation
(1) Residential buildings should have pedestrian access and visual orientation to the adjacent roadways and/or open space features, i.e., “front-on” lotting.
(2) Residential buildings shall be oriented on the site to create interesting and safe common open space areas that promote neighborly interaction.
(3) Sound walls shall be avoided, except as necessary to mitigate noise impacts.
(4) A variety of housing products should be incorporated into each development area to promote economic and architectural variety. (5) Except as provided in section IV.C.2.b.(3), below, garages should be recessed from the front facade, accessed from an alley or side yard, or detached to the rear of the building.
(6) A rich variety of architectural facade styles and materials should be incorporated into each development.
(7) Corner Lots : Special building configurations should be considered for corner lots because they have street frontage on two sides. First, it is important to address both of the streets on which the building abuts. Second, it is essential to have the building mass address the streets, rather than a driveway. With this in mind, porches on corner lots must either: a) wrap the corner, or b) the porch must have two sides which address the corner, or c) the entry and walk must address the corner. Orientation of the primary facade should take into account the location of entries on adjacent lots and lots across the street, as well as adjacencies to parks and other open spaces or urban design features. A driveway may not run along the length of a street. It must be to the inside of the building and the block. The driveway may access either street, but orientation to the minor street is preferred.
b. Residential Building Setback Standards
(1) Single-Family Detached Residential (6-8 du/ac) Building Setbacks:

The goal in setting strict standards for the building setbacks is to create a comfortable street edge for the pedestrian and to reduce the visual impact of the garage and car. In all cases, the porch or entry feature will bring the “social” part of the dwelling closer to the sidewalk and naturally recess the garage. The porch and entry will be allowed within 12'-6" of the front property line (or in the case of split sidewalk, from back of walk), with a maximum front yard setback

ALLEGHANY PROPERTIES PUD GUIDELINES
Review and Approvals

of 15'-0". The purpose of a maximum setback is to maintain the consistency of the built edge of the street. The garage must be at least 5'-0" behind the building line. See Exhibit 28 (Figures A and B). (a)
(b)
Porch/Entry
Building
12'-6" min.
17'-6" min.
15'-0" Max.
23"-0" Max
(c)
(d)
Side Yard
Rear Yard
5'-0" or 0' at detached garages1
20'-0" Min
(2) Single-Family Detached Residential (3-5 du/ac) Building Setbacks:

The porch and entry will be allowed to within 15'-0” of the front property line, or in the case of split sidewalk, from the back of walk, with a maximum front yard setback of 20'-0". The purpose of a maximum setback is to maintain the consistency of the built edge of the street. The garage must be at least 5'-0" behind the building line.

See Exhibit 28 (Figures C and D).
(a)
(b)
Porch/Entry
Building
15'-0" min.
20'-0" min.
20'-0" Max.
25"-0" Max
(c)
(d)
Side Yard
Rear Yard
7'-6" or 0' at detached garages
20'-0" Min.
(3) Compact, Small-Lot Single-Family Detached Residential (Minimum 16 du/acre): Compact, small-lot residential developments that face onto public or private alleys allow for a denser housing type. In addition to all the other guidelines in section IV.C.2., the following development standards apply to these types of developments to enhance the general livability, visual quality, and safety of the alley.
(a) Garage Placement:
(i) Garages and/or parking shall be located away from
public roadways internal to the development.
(ii) Units fronting private alleys with attached garages, are exempt from garage forward design provisions,
if the following applies:
1) The front façade of the main building wall is
recessed no more than 12.6 feet from the
front garage plane.
2) Each garage is accompanied by a front
porch entry, and shall not be recessed more
than 8 feet from the garage door entry.
3) Front porch shall be forward the front
garage plane, flush with the front garage
plane, or recessed from the front garage
plane a maximum of 8 feet.
4) Front entry porch shall be provided at a
minimum depth of 5 feet.
(iii) Homes shall deemphasize the driveway through
use of one of the following:

ALLEGHANY PROPERTIES PUD GUIDELINES
Review and Approvals

1) Specialty pavement; or
2) Landscaping strips between tire paths (i.e.,
hollywood strips).
(b) Alley Setback:
(i) A minimum setback of 5 feet shall be provided for
units fronting private alleys.
(c) Bulk Control:
(i) New single-unit dwelling subdivisions are exempt
from bulk control requirements if the lot sizes range
from 1,700 square feet to 2,100 square feet.
1 Zero-lot line configurations are allowed on the side drive.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
Adopted by the Sacramento City Council
February 24, 2026
Adopting Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the Enclave at Airport Road Project (P25-010) (APN: 225-0150-055-0000)
Background
A. On January 22, 2026, the City Planning and Design Commission conducted a public hearing on the Enclave at Airport Road Project (P25-010) and forwarded to the City Council a recommendation to approve the project with conditions.

B. On February 24, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing, for which notice was given pursuant to Sacramento City Code Section 17.812.010.A.2.a and b, and received and considered evidence concerning the Enclave at Airport Road Project (P25-010).

Based on the facts set forth in the Background, the City Council resolves as follows:

Section 1. Based on the verbal and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Enclave at Airport Road project (Project), the City Council approves the Project entitlements based on the findings of fact and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth below.

A. Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 2.03-acres into 32 residential lots and 8 common lots including 1 pedestrian access lot, 5 landscaped lots, and 2 private roads in the Single-Unit Dwelling and Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development (R-1A-PUD) zone is approved based on the following findings:

1. None of the conditions described in Government Code section 66474 exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows:
a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code.
b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, and all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 17 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code (Gov. Code, § 66473.5).

3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. Code, § 66474.6).

4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code, § 66473.1).

5. The City has considered the effect of the approval of this tentative subdivision map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code, § 66412.3).

B. Site Plan and Design Review of the Tentative Subdivision Map layout, the demolition of an existing single-unit dwelling and accessory structures, and the construction of 32 single-unit dwellings in the Single-Unit Dwelling or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) zone and Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved based on the following findings:

1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan or transit village plan. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and the general plan land use designation of Neighborhood in that it develops an underutilized property with a denser, compact housing type that includes enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections providing synergy with neighboring residential developments, the community park, and future multimodal pedestrian/bicycle path along Airport Road. The project is also consistent with the general plan in that this designation allows for small-lot single-unit dwellings at the proposed density of 16 dwelling units per net acre and aligns with the policies encouraging a compact urban form. The project area is not within a specific plan or transit village plan.

2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with applicable design guidelines and with all applicable development standards. The project complies with all development standards of the R-1A-PUD zone, MMH Interim Housing Ordinance, and the Natomas Crossing PUD and no deviations are requested. The project meets applicable Single-Unit and Duplex Dwelling Design Guidelines including provisions for porches which attractively identify entry features, a variety of exterior materials colors, and design elements are included providing visual interest and variation in massing, and the project is compatible in scale and massing with the surrounding development.

3. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards in that the parking facilities, driveways, and adequate utility infrastructure will be provided.

4. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in that the proposed project contains materials that are complementary to the visual appearance of other structures in the surrounding area. The project provides enhanced elevations along the public facing facades with increased transparency and planar changes and includes enhanced pedestrian connections via a private access easement for all residents to connect to the future multi-modal bike trail along Airport Road.

5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development ensure energy consumption is minimized and use of renewable energy sources is encouraged in that the project will utilize existing road and utility networks and positions residences within walking distance of routine destinations. Additionally, the buildings will be required to comply with the California Energy Code.

6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance in that in that natural surveillance is considered in the layout of the proposed subdivision and the addition of new homes on a vacant lot will improve the quality of life of existing residents. Further, the proposed use provides amble pedestrian and bicycle connections and integrates well with the existing neighborhood through appropriate scale, access, and parcel orientations.

7. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development will not result in fewer dwelling units than existed at the time the permit is approved in that the development proposes to demolish one single-unit dwelling for the construction of 32 single-unit dwellings.

8. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development will not result in the demolition of a dwelling unit that was covered by a rental or lease agreement that was in effect within 365 days before the permit is approved.

9. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development will not result in the demolition of one or more dwelling units covered by an affordable- housing regulatory agreement.

C. 200-Year Flood Protection Finding Consistent with State Law (SB 5) and Planning and Development Code Section 17.810:

1. The project site is within an area for which the facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control or other flood management facilities protect the project to the urban level of flood protection, as demonstrated by the SAFCA Urban Level of Flood Protection Engineer’s Reports accepted by the City Council on October 21, 2025 (Resolution No. 2025-0283).

Conditions of Approval
A. Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 2.03-acres into 32 residential lots and eight common lots including 1 pedestrian access lot, 5 landscaped lots, and 2 private roads in the Single-Unit or Duplex Dwelling (R-1A-PUD) zone and Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development (PUD) is approved with the following conditions:

NOTE: These conditions shall supersede any contradictory information shown on the Tentative Map approved for this project (P25-010). The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions shall be to City standard.

The applicant shall satisfy each of the following conditions prior to filing the Final Map unless a different time for compliance is specifically stated in these conditions. Any condition requiring an improvement that has already been designed and secured under a City Approved improvement agreement may be considered satisfied at the discretion of the Department of Public Works.

The City strongly encourages the applicant to thoroughly discuss the conditions of approval for the project with their Engineer/Land Surveyor consultants prior to City Planning and Design Commission approval. The improvements required of a Tentative Map can be costly and are completely dependent upon the condition of the existing improvements. Careful evaluation of the potential cost of the improvements required by the City will enable the applicant to ask questions of the City prior to project approval and will result in a smoother plan check process after project approval:

General
A1. The applicant shall participate in the North Natomas Financing Plan, adopted by Resolution No. 94-495 on August 9, 1994, and as updated periodically, and shall execute any and all agreements, which may be required in order to implement this condition.

A2. Comply with and meet all the requirements of the Development Agreement to the satisfaction of the City of Sacramento.

A3. Comply with the North Natomas Development Guidelines to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and the Department of Public Works. The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions shall be to City standards.

A4. Pursuant to City Code Section 17.500.190, indicate easements on the Final Map to allow for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. The specific locations for such easements shall be subject to review and approval of the Department of Public Works after consultation with the U.S. Postal Service; A5. Private reciprocal ingress, egress, maneuvering and parking easements are required for future development of the area covered by this Tentative Map.

The applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement For Conveyance of Easements with the City stating that a private reciprocal ingress/egress, and maneuvering, easement shall be conveyed to and reserved from all appropriate parcels, at no cost, at the time of sale or other conveyance of either parcel.

A6. Show all continuing and proposed/required easements on the Final Map.

A7. Provide without cost to the City, in the form of an IOD, all public land covered in the North Natomas Financing Plan Land Acquisition Program; Public Works
A8. Submit a Geotechnical Analysis prepared by a registered engineer to be used in street design. The analysis shall identify and recommend solutions for groundwater related problems, which may occur within both the subdivision lots and public right-of-way. Construct appropriate facilities to alleviate those problems. As a result of the analysis street sections shall be designed to provide for stabilized subgrades and pavement sections under high groundwater conditions.

A9. Construct standard subdivision improvements as noted in these conditions pursuant to section 17.504.050 of the City Code. All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The City shall determine improvements required for each phase prior to recordation of each phase. Any public improvement not specifically noted in these conditions or on the Tentative Map shall be designed and constructed to City standards. This shall include street lighting and the repair or replacement/reconstruction of any existing deteriorated curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the subject property per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A10. Provide standard driveways at the entrances to the private drives/alleys to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A11. The applicant shall remove all unused existing driveways and reconstruct the frontage to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A12. All private drives/alleys shall be designed and constructed to meet the City standards regarding structural section. Private drives/alleys shall be constructed and inspected to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. All private drives/alleys shall have a minimum 20-foot wide section as shown on the approved Tentative Subdivision Map.

A13. The applicant shall install bollards and appropriate signage to close the segment of Airport Road between Tanzanite Avenue and Naturita Way from vehicles for the future multi-use path conversion of Airport Road to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A14. Prior to recordation of any final map, the applicant has agreed to pay the Sum of $2,400 to be used by the City of Sacramento in a planning project for converting Airport Road into a bicycle facility. The planning project will identify appropriate methods, signage, appurtenances, etc. to restrict traffic along Airport Road and facilitate the conversion. With this payment, the applicant has met all their obligations towards any bicycle improvements along Airport Road.

A15. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle).

Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters. Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited 3.5' in height.

The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works.

A16. Developer is required to install permanent street signs to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

A17. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

SMUD
A18. SMUD has existing overhead 12kV facilities along Airport Rd that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A19. SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities on the south east portion of the project site, and 240V facilities along the north side of Tanzanite Ave that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion.

If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

A20. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre- engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

A21. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property. Applicant shall be responsible for confirming with SMUD appropriate/acceptable landscaping including placement within the easement area. SMUD reserves the right to prune & remove trees that encroach into the easement area. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval. New landscaping improvements shall be restricted to a maximum height of fifteen feet tall at full maturity.

A22. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal. Applicant is further made aware that the proposed location of any relocated facilities will be subject to SMUD’s vegetation management practices including restrictions of 15 feet high at full maturity and placement of trees within SMUD easements. Applicant shall bear cost to remove vegetation or trees located within proposed new facilities area and SMUD retains the right to engage in customary vegetation management practices at proposed new location after facility relocation. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

A23. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs, including but not limited to vegetation management, tree pruning or removal, weed abatement and application of weed abatement material, and a height restriction of fifteen feet tall at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

A24. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

A25. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD. Landscaping improvements placed within the IOD or 12.5- foot PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines and SMUD’s regular vegetation management practices including but not limited to restriction of 15 feet high at maturity and spacing as well as tree pruning, removal, or other standard vegetation management activities. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

A26. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUDsiting requirements can be foundat: https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Designand- Construction-Services.

A27. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

A28. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways. The 12.5-foot PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines within the easement area and such landscaping shall be subject to SMUD’s vegetation management practices including but not limited to tree pruning, removal, and weed abatement and a height limit of fifteen feet at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

A29. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, and 10- feet adjacent to each side thereof as a public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads. The private drive and 10-foot adjacent PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines within the easement area and such landscaping shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines including but not limited to tree pruning, removal, and weed abatement and a maximum allowable height of fifteen feet at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

SMUD may be agreeable to reducing the PUE only after review of Improvement Plans, Landscape Plans, Architectural drawings, etc.

A30. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

A31. Applicant will include phasing of development and order of planned construction upon submitting a new service application to SMUD for the initial subdivision phase(s) and/or road improvement backbone project(s).

A32. Development should be phased to start adjacent to existing electrical infrastructure to minimize temporary overhead and/or underground electrical facilities.

A33. Development phases submitted for new service should include all lots fronting streets.

Sacramento Area Sewer District
A34. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Installation of a public cleanout is required at the right-of-way. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A35. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The minimum size for public sewer mainlines is 8-inch diameter. Public sewer must be located within the right-of-way or a sewer easement. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A36. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required.

Current SacSewer Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

A37. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: SacSewer requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SacSewer’s sewer system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line upstream of any connection to the SacSewer sewer. Buildings on separate parcels must have a separate connection to a private or public sewer main line collector built to SacSewer’s standards. This includes pipes designed at a minimum of 8- inches in diameter and 48-inch manholes as needed. If a private sewer main line is desired, a Private Sewer Maintenance Agreement must be executed with SacSewer before plan approval to ensure the private owner properly maintains the private main line collector. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

A38. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Private sewer main lines shall meet SacSewer Standards for collectors. A Private Sewer Maintenance Agreement shall be executed between SacSewer and the owner(s) of all lots to be served by the private sewer main line to ensure that the owner(s) will be solely responsible for the operation and maintenance of the onsite sewer, including the private main line.

A39. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Sewer easements will be required to service this parcel. All public sewer easements will be dedicated to SacSewer in a form approved by the District Engineer. All public sewer easements will be at least 20 feet in width and will require continuous access for installation and maintenance. SacSewer will only provide maintenance in public right-of-ways and SacSewer dedicated sewer easements. No awning or overhang may encroach on the easement area. At minimum, an all-weather access road must be provided to all manholes.

A40. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines are prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100- year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

A41. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Lower Laterals must not directly connect to main lines more than 19 feet deep / directly to trunk lines (lines with flow greater than 1 MGD).

A42. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

A43. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All manholes not within public right of way must be accessible with an all-weather access road.

A44. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

A45. Prior to the SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a Level 3 sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appropriate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be done in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by SacSewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

A46. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS. Any landscaping within easement areas is limited to lawn or similar groundcover, or plant species that are not environmentally protected and whose mature growth does not exceed five feet in height. When planting, place a root barrier system, such as trifluralin fabric, between the main lines or laterals and any trees or shrubs planted within the easement area.

Department of Utilities
A47. All existing easements and all existing right-of-ways shall be shown on the Final Map, except for all abandoned easements and right-of-ways.

A48. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water study for review and approval by the DOU. The water system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval. (Note: A water service agreement is required for common private water systems.)
A49. Easements for water meters and access easements over private alleys shall be dedicated to the City and shall include language assuring unrestricted access at all times for DOU personnel and maintenance vehicles.

A50. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual.

A51. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall prepare a project specific drainage study meeting the criteria specified in the current Onsite Design Manual and/or the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. Per the current DOU Onsite Design Manual, either a static or dynamic analysis for mitigating sizing and drainage system design may be used. Using the static analysis and per the DOU onsite project storage method, an estimated 10,600 cubic feet of detention must be provided per each additional acre of impervious area. The maximum discharge rate must be limited to an estimated 0.10 cfs/acre. The drainage study shall be consistent with the latest basin 16 drainage model for the project area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval. (Note: Per the Basin 6 drainage masterplan, this project is located within two watersheds (162 and 163), which have an impervious allocation of 77% and 70%, respectively. If the project exceeds the allocated impervious area, drainage mitigation will be required.)
A52. The onsite water and storm drain systems shall be private systems maintained by the association or other approved entity.

A53. Prior to the initiation of water and storm drainage service to the development, a privately funded maintenance district or a homeowners association (HOA) shall be formed and C.C.&R’s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities within the private alleys and common areas. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The CC&Rs must provide that the Cityapproved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

A54. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is higher or as approved by the DOU.

A55. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

A56. No more than 6,000 square feet is allowed to sheet drain over a public sidewalk. If the area is larger than 6,000 square feet, then an on-site surface drainage system is required and shall be connected to the street drainage system by means of a storm drain service tap. All on-site drainage systems shall be designed to the standard specified in the DOU onsite design manual.

A57. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

A58. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

A59. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings. These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.

A60. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area served by an existing regional water quality control facility, therefore only source control, and Low Impact Development (LID) measures, certified full capture trash control devices are required. Improvement plans must include the measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” Chapter 4 for appropriate source control measures and chapter 5 for appropriate LID and HMP measures.

A61. A maintenance agreement may be required for LID measures and full capture control devices. Contact DOU for a list of accepted proprietary devices considered for LID and full capture trash control. Construction drawings must include all proposed source controls and on-site water quality measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” for appropriate measures.

A62. The proposed project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as A99 zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). As of July 1, 2024, new regulations to this area apply as contained in the current Comprehensive Flood Management Plan (CFMP). Any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any structure must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least 12-inches above the highest adjacent 100-year event HGL of the City’s drainage system and at least 18-inches above the Controlling Overland Release Point in the public right-of-way. Also, a Hold Harmless Agreement, and an Elevation or Floodproofing Certificate or both (commercial properties have the option of floodproofing if elevation is not feasible) will be required.

Fire
A63. Prior to Final Map approval a maintenance agreement shall be provided for the interior roadways of the proposed complex and for the fire protection systems. The agreement shall be record with the Public Recorders Office having jurisdiction and shall provide for the following:
a. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of the roadway surface.
b. Removal of vegetation overgrowing the roadway and infringing on the roadway clear vertical height of thirteen feet six inches (13’6”) and/or width of twenty feet (20’).
c. Provisions for the maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signage or striping
d. Provisions for the necessary repair and maintenance of vehicle and pedestrian access gates and opening systems
e. Unrestricted use of and access to the roadways covered by the agreements.
f. Provisions for the control of vehicle parking in prohibited areas and a mechanism for the removal of vehicles illegally parked. g. Maintenance and timely repair of all fire protection systems, including but not limited to hydrants, fire alarm systems and fire sprinklers.

Parks
A64. Payment of In-lieu Park Fee: Pursuant to Sacramento City Code Chapter

17.512 (Parkland Dedication) the applicant shall pay to City an in-lieu park fee in the amount determined under SCC §§17.512.030 and 17.512.040 equal to the value of land prescribed for dedication under 17.512.020 and not satisfied by dedication. (See Advisory Note)
A65. Maintenance District: The applicant shall initiate and complete the formation of a parks maintenance district (assessment or Mello-Roos special tax district) or annex the project into an existing parks maintenance district. The applicant shall pay all city fees for formation of or annexation to a parks maintenance district. (Contact Infrastructure Finance, Doreen Chia, (916) 808-5447, [email protected]).

Miscellaneous
A66. Form a Homeowner's Association. CC&R's shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of all private drives/alleys and landscape lots.

The Homeowner's Association shall maintain all private drives/alleys, lights, landscaping, walls, fences, and all common areas.

A67. Provide an Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate (IOD) in easement to the City for those areas identified on the Tentative Subdivision Map as Landscape areas (Lot A, B, C, D, E, & H). The IOD shall include all necessary easements as required for such areas to be publicly maintained. The intent of the IOD is to transfer ownership of these areas should the Homeowners Association become insolvent. Create, or annex the project area to the appropriate Landscape Maintenance District, or other financing mechanism acceptable to the City, prior to recordation of the final map. Design and construct landscaping, irrigation and masonry walls in dedicated easements or right of way, consistent with the PUD Design Guidelines and to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Acceptance of the required landscaping, irrigation and walls by the City into the Landscape Maintenance District shall be coordinated with the Department of Finance and Public Works. The Developer shall maintain the landscaping, irrigation and walls through the HOA or another financing mechanism acceptable to the City.

Advisory Notes:

The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map:

ADV1. If unusual amounts of bone, stone, or artifacts are uncovered, work, in the area within the distance required by federal and state regulations, will cease immediately and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to develop, if necessary, further mitigation measures to reduce any archaeological impact to a less than significant effect before construction resumes. A note shall be placed on the final improvement plans referencing this condition.

Public Works

ADV2. House plans shall comply with City Code Chapter 17.508 Driveways which includes:

17.508.040.J All driveways shall be at least 5-ft away from the property line.

17.508.050.A Residential driveways shall have a width of at least 10- ft and a depth of at least 20-ft measured from the rightof-way line.

17.508.070.D.3 Garages off alleys shall be set back at least 4-feet away from the alley right-of-way.

Department of Utilities
ADV3. The applicant shall coordinate with any adjacent property owner(s), where a grade change along property lines is proposed and ensure all related issues and concerns are addressed.

ADV4. The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer). Satisfy all SacSewer requirements.

ADV5. Common private water systems shall have a gate valve installed for residential subdivisions, and common private drainage systems shall have manholes installed at the point of service. (Note: If the common private water system is used to serve fire needs (i.e. fire hydrants), then a double check device will be required to be installed at the point of service.) ADV6. On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023-0338 and 2023-0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Combined Sewer Development Fees, as well as, establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024.

Sacramento Area Sewer District
ADV7. Prior to the ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

ADV8. ONGOING: Public lower laterals must not be smaller than the upper laterals, sized according the California Plumbing Code requirements.

ADV9. ONGOING: SacSewer prohibits gates that prevent access within sewer easements unless the District standards for accessibility through gates are met.

ADV10. ONGOING: Any use of SacSewer sewer easements, which is not compatible or interferes with the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, or repair of SacSewer sanitary sewer(s), must not be allowed. Each proposed use must be reviewed and approved in writing by the District Engineer prior to the use of the easement by the Grantor. This includes landscaping.

Parks
ADV11. As per City Code, the applicant will be responsible to meet his/her obligations regarding:
a) Title 17, 17.512 Park Dedication / In Lieu (Quimby) Fees, due prior to recordation of the final map. The Quimby fee due for this project is estimated at $113,088. This is based on the tentative subdivision map to create 32 residential lots with 32 Single Family Dwelling Units. The Quimby in lieu fee is based on the total number of units approved for construction or allowed by zone with an average land value of $310,000 per acre for the North Natomas Community Plan Area, plus an additional 20% for off-site park infrastructure improvements. Any change in these factors will change the amount of the Quimby fee due. The final fee is calculated using factors at the time of payment. The fee is due at the time of the final map. The Department of Public Works is the lead for resolving the conditions on the map, including the invoicing and payment of the in-lieu fee.
b) Title 18, 18.56 Park Development Impact Fee, due at the time of issuance of building permit. The Park Development Impact Fee is estimated at $181,200.

This project proposes a total of 32 Single Family Dwelling residential units.

The Park Development Impact Fee due for this project is based on the Remainder of City Rate of $3.47 per square foot for residential projects, with a minimum rate of $2,604 for units under 750 square feet and a maximum of $6,947 for units over 2,000 square feet. The applicant would likely receive credit for the demolition of the existing structures. Any change in these factors will change the amount of the PIF due. The fee is calculated using factors at the time that the project is submitted for building permit. c) Community Facilities District 2002-02, Neighborhood Park Maintenance CFD Annexation.

B. Site Plan and Design Review of the Tentative Map layout, the demolition of an existing single-unit dwelling and accessory structures, and the construction of 32 single-unit dwellings in the Single-Unit Dwelling and Natomas Crossing Area 2 Planned Unit Development (R-1A-PUD) zone.

Planning
B1. This approval is for the demolition of on-site structures to facilitate the subdivision of the site into 32 residential lots for the construction of 32 singleunit dwellings and eight (8) commons lots for site improvements as shown on the final approved plans. The 32 single-unit dwellings shall consist of four elevations with three color schemes. Any increase in the number of lots or any modification to the location of the lots specified for these house plans shall be reviewed by the Planning Division and may require additional entitlements.

B2. Development of the site shall be in compliance with the approved plans and these conditions of approval. Any modification(s) to the project shall be subject to review and approval by Planning staff (and may require additional entitlements) prior to the issuance of building permits.

B3. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building and encroachment permits prior to the commencement of construction.

B4. The project is approved per final approved plans and these conditions of approval.

B5. The building elevations shall have a consistency of detail and quality as indicated on the plans. If there are any discrepancies between the exhibits and the conditions, the conditions will take precedence. All notes and drawings on the included plans as submitted by the applicant are deemed conditions of approval. Any work that differs from the final set of plans approved by Planning staff shall be subject to review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit or work undertaken.

B6. All newly installed ground-mounted and roof-mounted mechanical equipment must be completely concealed from all adjacent and approaching right-of-way views. Construction documents shall clearly illustrate compliance. Placement of all exterior mechanical equipment, along with any necessary screening and details, must be shown on site plans, roof plans, and exterior elevations.

Permanently supported solid, slatted, or louvered metal panel material only may be used. Openings in slatted material shall be less than 10%. Louvered material shall be positioned so spacing does not align with line of sight views.

All material shall be painted to match elements of building exterior finish.

B7. All newly installed exterior wall-mounted and ground-mounted electrical service equipment, excluding transformers, must be completely concealed from all adjacent and approaching right-of-way views. Construction documents shall clearly illustrate compliance. Placement of all exterior electrical equipment, along with any necessary screening and details, must be shown on site plans, floor plans, and exterior elevations, while maintaining all service clearance requirements. Permanently supported solid, slatted, or louvered metal panel material only may be used. Openings in slatted material shall be less than 10%. All material shall be painted to match elements of building exterior finish.

B8. Trash receptacles shall be screened from street view.

B9. Building height, setbacks, and massing shall be consistent with the approved plans.

B10. The building shall be painted with the color theme as shown on the final approved plans. Any significant changes in applied paint color shall be reviewed and approved by Planning staff during building permit plan check.

B11. Identical house plans placed on adjacent/consecutive lots shall have different elevation schemes. The applicant shall provide a lotting plan/exhibit that indicates the plan and elevation of all lots for Planning staff to confirm prior to issuance of building permits.

B12. All building elevations shall have a form and design consistent with the final approved plans.

B13. Provide the following design elements as shown on the approved plans:

A1. Stucco.

B1. Stucco trim.

C1. Painted trim.

D1. Horizontal lap siding.

E1. Board and batten siding.

F1.Stone veneer.

G1. Garage doors in various styles.

H1. Composition roofing.

I1. Hollywood driveway.

B14. Lots with facades visible from Tanzanite Avenue shall feature enhanced side elevations consistent with (House plan 1X and House plan 2X) in the final approved project plans. The project has been approved with details and elevation enhancements that are essential for each design, and they shall not be omitted or modified during construction.

B15. All gutters and downspouts shall be painted to match building color scheme.

B16. Landscaping shall be provided as indicated on the approved plans, including, ornamental trees, shrubs, and grass as shown on the landscape plan.

B17. All landscaping and planting shall conform to City standards for sight line requirements at intersections and driveways.

B18. There shall be a minimum of one medium canopy tree planted in the rear yard of each single family unit as shown on the landscape plan.

B19. Interior fencing, if provided, shall be vinyl or wood privacy fencing (or equivalent) between units as indicated on the approved plans, not to exceed 6-feet in height.

B20. Parking lot layout shall be consistent with approved plans; parking stalls and drive aisle shall comply with Title 17 development standards.

B21. Signs were not reviewed as part of the review and approval of the proposed project. All signs shall require review and approval by Design Review and shall conform to the sign ordinance and require sign permit issuance.

B22. A photometric plan shall be provided for all outdoor lighting in and around the site at the time of plan check. The type and location of the outdoor and exterior lighting (buildings, parking areas, etc.) shall be approved by Planning and Design Review staff during building plan check. Lighting shall be provided at the ground-level on all sides of the building and at each building entry.

B23. Per Section 17.612.030(B), exterior lighting shall reflect away from public streets. Fixtures shall be unobtrusive and complementary to the architectural design of the building. Lighting shall be designed so as not to produce hazardous and annoying glare to motorists and building occupants, adjacent residents, or the general public.

B24. This project is within the Natomas Basin Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project applicant/developer shall complete the pre-construction surveys for potential special-status species not less than 30 days or more than 6 months prior to construction activities in accordance with the 2003 NBHCP. The preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, botanist, or related expert and will be reviewed by EPS, CDFW, USFWS, and the Natomas Basin Conservancy.

B25. It is in the City’s interest to prevent blight by maintaining existing development on a site until such time as new construction is undertaken as evidenced by issuance of building permits for new development. Therefore, the applicant shall not commence demolition until a building permit is ready to be issued for the new structure.

B26. Prior to final building occupancy of the first unit, the project shall be subject to an on-site inspection by Planning staff to ensure all conditions of approval are satisfied. If the residential development is phased, the project shall be subject to an on-site inspection by Planning staff prior to final building occupancy of the first unit of each phase to ensure all conditions of approval have been satisfied.

B27. Planning In-progress inspections (93) shall be called for prior to the following Building Inspections: 10 Bldg-Foundation Forms, 12 Bldg-Concrete Slab Forms, and 19 Bldg-Frame. An 89 Planning Final shall be called for prior to 29 Building Final. Please coordinate with your assigned Planning Inspection Team reviewer.

B28. Prior to final building occupancy of the first unit, the project shall be subject to an on-site inspection by Planning staff to ensure all conditions of approval are satisfied.

B29. This approval is effective for three years and subject to City Code Section

17.808.400. Time extensions to establish a use, construct a development project, or to demolish a structure may be granted as provided in Section

17.808.400.B. Time extensions are discretionary and not the automatic right of the applicant.

Public Works
B30. The applicant shall record the Final Map, which creates the lot pattern shown on the proposed site plan prior to obtaining any Building Permits.

B31. The applicant shall participate in the North Natomas Financing Plan, adopted by Resolution No. 94-495 on August 9, 1994, and as updated periodically, and shall execute any and all agreements, which may be required in order to implement this condition.

B32. Comply with and meet all the requirements of the Development Agreement to the satisfaction of the City of Sacramento.

B33. Comply with the North Natomas Development Guidelines to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and the Department of Public Works. The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions shall be to City standards.

B34. Construct standard public improvements as noted in these conditions pursuant to Title 17 of the City Code. Improvements shall be designed to City Standards and assured as set forth in Section 17.502.130 of the City Code. All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Any public improvement not specifically noted in these conditions shall be designed and constructed to City Standards. This shall include the repair or replacement/reconstruction of any existing deteriorated curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the subject property per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

B35. All right-of-way and street improvement transitions that result from changing the right-of-way of any street shall be located, designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. The center lines of such streets shall be aligned.

B36. All new driveways shall be designed and constructed to City Standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

B37. The applicant shall remove all unused existing driveways and reconstruct the frontage to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

B38. Garage setbacks shall be a minimum of 4-ft setback from the private alleys to the satisfacting of the Department of Public Works.

B39. The site plan shall conform to A.D.A. requirements in all respects. This shall include the replacement of any curb ramp that does not meet current A.D.A. standards.

B40. This project will require the installation of streetlights on all public streets fronting this property to the satisfaction of Public Works. The number and locations of these lights will be determined when development plans are submitted for review.

B41. The site plan shall conform to the parking requirements set forth in City Code

17.608.040.

B42. The applicant shall provide a signing and striping improvement plan if new signage or striping is proposed; or if existing signing and/or striping is removed or relocated. The plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.

B43. The design of walls fences and signage near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section 12.28.010 (25' sight triangle). Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters. Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited 3.5' in height at maturity. The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works.

B44. Form a Homeowner's Association. CC&R's shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of all private streets and alleys. The Homeowner's Association shall maintain all private alleys, lights, landscaping, walls, fences, and all common areas.

Department of Utilities
B45. Per City Code Section, 13.04.070, multiple water service to a single lot or parcel may be allowed if approved by DOU Development Review and Operations and Maintenance staff. Any new water services (other than fire) shall be metered. Excess services shall be abandoned to the satisfaction of the DOU.

B46. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of improvement plans, prepare a project specific water study for review and approval by the DOU. The water system shall be designed to satisfy the more critical of the two following conditions: (1) at maximum day peak hour demand, the operating or "residual" pressure at all water service connections shall be at least 30 pounds per square inch, (2) at average maximum day demand plus fire flow, the operating or "residual" pressure in the area of the fire shall not be less than 20 pounds per square inch. The water study shall determine if the existing and proposed water distribution system is adequate to supply fire flow demands for the project. A water supply test may be required for this project. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any water related requirements. Failure to submit the water study may delay review and approval. (Note: A water service agreement is required for common private water systems.)
B47. Easements for water meters and access easements over private alleys shall be dedicated to the City and shall include language assuring unrestricted access at all times for DOU personnel and maintenance vehicles.

B48. Two points of service for the public water distribution system for this subdivision or any phase of this subdivision are required. All water lines shall be placed within the asphalt section of public right-of-ways as per the City’s Design and Procedures Manual.

B49. Prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the building permit application, the applicant shall prepare a project specific drainage study meeting the criteria specified in the current Onsite Design Manual and/or the Design and Procedures Manual, for review and approval by the DOU. Per the current DOU Onsite Design Manual, either a static or dynamic analysis for mitigating sizing and drainage system design may be used. Using the static analysis and per the DOU onsite project storage method, an estimated 10,600 cubic feet of detention must be provided per each additional acre of impervious area. The maximum discharge rate must be limited to an estimated 0.10 cfs/acre. The drainage study shall be consistent with the latest basin 16 drainage model for the project area. The applicant is advised to contact the City of Sacramento Utilities Department Development Review Section (916-808-7890) at the early planning stages to address any drainage related requirements. Failure to submit the drainage study may delay review and approval. (Note: Per the Basin 6 drainage masterplan, this project is located within two watersheds (162 and 163), which have an impervious allocation of 77% and 70%, respectively. If the project exceeds the allocated impervious area, drainage mitigation will be required.)
B50. The onsite water and storm drain systems shall be private systems maintained by the association or other approved entity.

B51. Prior to the initiation of water and storm drainage service to the development, a privately funded maintenance district or a homeowners association (HOA) shall be formed and C.C.&R’s shall be approved by the City and recorded assuring maintenance of water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities within the private alleys and common areas. Private easements shall be dedicated for these facilities. The CC&Rs must provide that the Cityapproved provisions regarding water and surface and subsurface storm drainage facilities may not be revised without City consent. If required by the DOU, the responsible maintenance agency shall enter into and record an agreement with the City regarding the maintenance of these facilities. The agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the DOU and the City Attorney.

B52. Finished floor elevations shall be a minimum of 1-foot above the 100-year HGL or 1.5–feet above the overland flow release elevation, whichever is higher or as approved by the DOU.

B53. Per City Code, the applicant may not develop the project in any way that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the natural flow of existing off-site drainage that crosses the property. The project shall construct the required public and/or private infrastructure to handle off-site runoff to the satisfaction of the DOU. If private infrastructure is constructed to handle off-site runoff, the applicant shall dedicate the required private easements, and/or, at the discretion of the DOU, the applicant shall enter into and record an Agreement for Maintenance of Drainage with the City, in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

B54. No more than 6,000 square feet is allowed to sheet drain over a public sidewalk. If the area is larger than 6,000 square feet, then an on-site surface drainage system is required and shall be connected to the street drainage system by means of a storm drain service tap. All on-site drainage systems shall be designed to the standard specified in the DOU onsite design manual.

B55. A grading plan showing existing and proposed elevations is required. Adjacent off-site topography shall also be shown to the extent necessary to determine impacts to existing surface drainage paths. No grading shall occur until the grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the DOU.

B56. This project will disturb more than one acre of land; therefore, the project is required to comply with the State’s “Construction General Permit”. To comply with the State Permit, the applicant must file a Notice of Intent (NOI) through the State’s Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). A valid WDID number must be obtained and provided to the DOU prior to the issuance of any grading permits.

B57. The applicant must comply with the City of Sacramento's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. This ordinance requires the applicant to show erosion and sediment control methods on the construction drawings. These plans shall also show the methods to control urban runoff pollution from the project site during construction.

B58. Post construction (permanent), stormwater quality control measures shall be incorporated into the development to minimize the increase of urban runoff pollution caused by development of the area. The project is an area served by an existing regional water quality control facility, therefore only source control, and Low Impact Development (LID) measures, certified full capture trash control devices are required. Improvement plans must include the measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” Chapter 4 for appropriate source control measures and chapter 5 for appropriate LID and HMP measures.

B59. A maintenance agreement may be required for LID measures and full capture control devices. Contact DOU for a list of accepted proprietary devices considered for LID and full capture trash control. Construction drawings must include all proposed source controls and on-site water quality measures selected for the site. Refer to the latest edition of the “Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento Region” for appropriate measures.

B60. The proposed project is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), designated as A99 zone by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). As of July 1, 2024, new regulations to this area apply as contained in the current Comprehensive Flood Management Plan (CFMP). Any new construction of and/or substantial improvement to any structure must have the lowest floor, including the basement, elevated at least 12-inches above the highest adjacent 100-year event HGL of the City’s drainage system and at least 18-inches above the Controlling Overland Release Point in the public right-of-way. Also, a Hold Harmless Agreement, and an Elevation or Floodproofing Certificate or both (commercial properties have the option of floodproofing if elevation is not feasible) will be required.

Fire
B61. Timing and Installation. When fire protection, including fire apparatus access roads and water supplies for fire protection, is required to be installed, such protection shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. California Fire Code Section 501.4
B62. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that roads used for Fire Department access that are less than 28 feet in width shall be marked "No Parking Fire Lane" on both sides; roads less than 36 feet in width shall be marked on one side.

B63. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, identify that Fire Apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities. California Fire Code Section 503.2.3 Access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (70,000 Lbs) and shall be provided with a roadbed consisting of material unaffected by the introduction of water based upon fire flow or rain based on 25-year storm and a surface consisting of a minimum of a single layer of asphalt.

B64. Upon submitting improvement plans for review, provide a water flow test. (Make arrangements with the Department of Utilities at 916-808-7890 or by email at [email protected] California Fire Code Section 507.4
Solid Waste
B65. Project must meet the requirements outlined in City Code Chapter 13.10.

B66. There must be sufficient space to store a minimum of one garbage container and one mixed recycling container per unit, and one organics recycling container per parcel, to ensure all material generated on the parcel is diverted into the correct waste stream. The minimum space needed is approximately 35 inches by 87 inches per unit.

B67. There must be sufficient space to set out all containers (garbage, mixed recycling, and organics recycling) in front of each parcel and remain in compliance with City Code Chapter 13.10.100.

A1. Containers must be placed in accordance with the trash management plan.

B1. HOA/Builder shall provide ongoing education to residents to ensure containers are placed in the proper locations. Education shall begin when the first containers are delivered to the project.

B68. Solid waste trucks must be able to safely move about the project, with minimum backing, and able to empty the containers safely.

A1. HOA/Builder shall sign an ongoing parking enforcement agreement with the City of Sacramento to ensure there is sufficient access for solid waste trucks.

Police Department
During Construction:

B69. The applicant shall enclose the entire perimeter of the project with a chain link fence with necessary construction gates to be locked after normal construction hours.

B70. The location shall be monitored by security after normal construction hours during all phases of construction. This can be done via remote camera monitoring.

B71. Adequate security lighting shall be provided to illuminate vulnerable equipment and materials. Lighting shall be white light with full cut off fixtures.

SMUD
B72. SMUD has existing overhead 12kV facilities along Airport Rd that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 95 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion. If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

B73. SMUD has existing underground 12kV facilities on the south east portion of the project site, and 240V facilities along the north side of Tanzanite Ave that will need to remain. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining all CalOSHA and State of California Public Utilities Commission General Order No. 128 safety clearances during construction and upon building completion.

If the required clearances cannot be maintained, the Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation.

B74. Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall require the Applicant to conduct a pre- engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure property clearances are maintained.

B75. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the Applicant’s property shall require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the Applicant’s property. Applicant shall be responsible for confirming with SMUD appropriate/acceptable landscaping including placement within the easement area. SMUD reserves the right to prune & remove trees that encroach into the easement area. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval. New landscaping improvements shall be restricted to a maximum height of fifteen feet tall at full maturity.

B76. In the event the Applicant requires the relocation or removal of existing SMUD facilities on or adjacent to the subject property, the Applicant shall coordinate with SMUD. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cost of relocation or removal. Applicant is further made aware that the proposed location of any relocated facilities will be subject to SMUD’s vegetation management practices including restrictions of 15 feet high at full maturity and placement of trees within SMUD easements. Applicant shall bear cost to remove vegetation or trees located within proposed new facilities area and SMUD retains the right to engage in customary vegetation management practices at proposed new location after facility relocation. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

B77. SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of its easements on or adjacent to the subject property that it reasonably needs and shall not be responsible for any damages to the developed property within said easement that unreasonably interferes with those needs, including but not limited to vegetation management, tree pruning or removal, weed abatement and application of weed abatement material, and a height restriction of fifteen feet tall at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

B78. The Applicant shall not place any building foundations within 5-feet of any SMUD trench to maintain adequate trench integrity. The Applicant shall verify specific clearance requirements for other utilities (e.g., Gas, Telephone, etc.).

B79. In the event the City requires an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) for future roadway improvements, the Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to the City’s IOD. Landscaping improvements placed within the IOD or 12.5- foot PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines and SMUD’s regular vegetation management practices including but not limited to restriction of 15 feet high at maturity and spacing as well as tree pruning, removal, or other standard vegetation management activities. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

B80. The Applicant shall comply with SMUD siting requirements (e.g., panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location, service conductors). Information regarding SMUDsiting requirements can be foundat: https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-and-Rebates/Designand- Construction-Services.

B81. The Applicant shall provide separate SMUD service points to each parcel to the satisfaction of SMUD.

B82. The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways. The 12.5-foot PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines within the easement area and such landscaping shall be subject to SMUD’s vegetation management practices including but not limited to tree pruning, removal, and weed abatement and a height limit of fifteen feet at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

B83. The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive, ingress and egress easement, and 10- feet adjacent to each side thereof as a public utility easement for overhead and/or underground facilities and appurtenances. All access roads shall meet minimum SMUD requirements for access roads. The private drive and 10-foot adjacent PUE shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines within the easement area and such landscaping shall be subject to SMUD’s landscaping and tree placement guidelines including but not limited to tree pruning, removal, and weed abatement and a maximum allowable height of fifteen feet at full maturity. Applicant shall submit landscape improvement plans with tentative or final map as a condition of approval.

SMUD may be agreeable to reducing the PUE only after review of Improvement Plans, Landscape Plans, Architectural drawings, etc.

B84. The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-weather vehicular access for service vehicles that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum: (a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feet wide; and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the drivable surface.

B85. Applicant will include phasing of development and order of planned construction upon submitting a new service application to SMUD for the initial subdivision phase(s) and/or road improvement backbone project(s).

B86. Development should be phased to start adjacent to existing electrical infrastructure to minimize temporary overhead and/or underground electrical facilities.

B87. Development phases submitted for new service should include all lots fronting streets.

Sacramento Area Sewer District
B88. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Installation of a public cleanout is required at the right-of-way. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

B89. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The minimum size for public sewer mainlines is 8-inch diameter. Public sewer must be located within the right-of-way or a sewer easement. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

B90. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: To obtain sewer service, construction of SacSewer sewer infrastructure will be required.

Current SacSewer Standards and Specifications apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer construction or modification. These improvements must be shown on the plans. Field modifications to new or existing precast manhole bases are not allowed.

B91. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: SacSewer requires each building on each lot with a sewage source to have a separate connection to SacSewer’s sewer system. If there is more than one building in any single parcel and the parcel is not proposed for split, then each building on that parcel must have a separate connection to a private onsite sewer line upstream of any connection to the SacSewer sewer. Buildings on separate parcels must have a separate connection to a private or public sewer main line collector built to SacSewer’s standards. This includes pipes designed at a minimum of 8- inches in diameter and 48-inch manholes as needed. If a private sewer main line is desired, a Private Sewer Maintenance Agreement must be executed with SacSewer before plan approval to ensure the private owner properly maintains the private main line collector. These improvements must be shown on the plans.

B92. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Private sewer main lines shall meet SacSewer Standards for collectors. A Private Sewer Maintenance Agreement shall be executed between SacSewer and the owner(s) of all lots to be served by the private sewer main line to ensure that the owner(s) will be solely responsible for the operation and maintenance of the onsite sewer, including the private main line.

B93. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Sewer easements will be required to service this parcel. All public sewer easements will be dedicated to SacSewer in a form approved by the District Engineer. All public sewer easements will be at least 20 feet in width and will require continuous access for installation and maintenance. SacSewer will only provide maintenance in public right-of-ways and SacSewer dedicated sewer easements. No awning or overhang may encroach on the easement area. At minimum, an all-weather access road must be provided to all manholes.

B94. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Construction of sewer mainlines are prohibited within 100-year flood plains. The location of the 100- year flood plain must be shown on the improvement plan.

B95. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Lower Laterals must not directly connect to main lines more than 19 feet deep / directly to trunk lines (lines with flow greater than 1 MGD).

B96. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All onsite sewer plans and offsite sewer plans must be submitted separately to SacSewer for review and approval.

B97. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: All manholes not within public right of way must be accessible with an all-weather access road.

B98. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Alignment of all main lines and structures must provide a minimum of 1 foot vertical clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured horizontally) from any structure or footing. Show public sanitary sewer and water supply facilities in accordance with the Health and Safety Code.

B99. Prior to the SUBMITTAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS: For this project, SacSewer requires a Level 3 sewer study prior to the submittal of improvement plans for plan check to SacSewer. The sewer study shall demonstrate the quantity of discharge and any “flow through sewage” along with appropriate pipe sizes and related appurtenances from this subject and other upstream areas and shall be done in accordance with SacSewers’ most recent “Minimum Sewer Study Requirements”. The study shall be done on a no “Shed-Shift” basis unless approved by SacSewer in advance and in compliance with SacSewer Design Standards.

B100. Prior to the APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS. Any landscaping within easement areas is limited to lawn or similar groundcover, or plant species that are not environmentally protected and whose mature growth does not exceed five feet in height. When planting, place a root barrier system, such as trifluralin fabric, between the main lines or laterals and any trees or shrubs planted within the easement area.

Advisory Notes:

Department of Utilities
ADV1. The applicant shall coordinate with any adjacent property owner(s), where a grade change along property lines is proposed and ensure all related issues and concerns are addressed.

ADV2. The proposed development is located within the Sacramento Area Sewer District (SacSewer). Satisfy all SacSewer requirements.

ADV3. Common private water systems shall have a gate valve installed for residential subdivisions, and common private drainage systems shall have manholes installed at the point of service. (Note: If the common private water system is used to serve fire needs (i.e. fire hydrants), then a double check device will be required to be installed at the point of service.) ADV4. On October 24, 2023, and November 14, 2023, City Council adopted Resolutions 2023-0338 and 2023-0368, respectively, to adjust the Water System, Sewer, and Combined Sewer Development Fees, as well as, establish the Storm Drainage Development Fee to align with updated Nexus Studies. These resolutions provide for an effective date for the new Utility Development Fees as of January 22, 2024.

Sacramento Area Sewer District
ADV5. Prior to the ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT: The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at [email protected] or by phone at (916) 876-6100 to determine if SacSewer impact fees are due. Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building permits.

ADV6. ONGOING: Public lower laterals must not be smaller than the upper laterals, sized according the California Plumbing Code requirements.

ADV7. ONGOING: SacSewer prohibits gates that prevent access within sewer easements unless the District standards for accessibility through gates are met.

ADV8. ONGOING: Any use of SacSewer sewer easements, which is not compatible or interferes with the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, or repair of SacSewer sanitary sewer(s), must not be allowed. Each proposed use must be reviewed and approved in writing by the District Engineer prior to the use of the easement by the Grantor. This includes landscaping.

Sacramento Metro Air District
ADV9. Due to the urban heat island effect, developed areas in Sacramento range 3 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than surrounding areas, which results in decreased air quality and associated public health impacts. The urban heat island results from the conversion of undeveloped land to developed land.

Attached for easy reference is a Sac Metro Air District fact sheet on urban heat island effect impacts and measures to reduce these impacts, which the City also provides project proponents. Measures in this fact sheet support policies in the City Climate Action & Adaptation Plan, associated with Goal A-2 to reduce the urban heat island effect. Sac Metro Air District recommends incorporating measures from the attached fact sheet such as cool roofing. The Cool Roof Rating Council provides a product directory of roofs. We commend the tree shade provided along the sidewalk on Tanzanite Avenue as a measure to help reduce urban heat island effect impacts and create healthier sidewalk conditions. We recommend using the tree species with the greatest feasible canopy width for maximum shade. Greater neighborhood tree canopy has been correlated to improvement of overall human health and supports healthy pedestrian and other active transportation.

ADV10. Policies in the City Climate Action & Adaptation Plan call for transitioning buildings to all carbon-free energy such as renewable electricity, and away from energy such as natural gas. Further, buildings without natural gas provide substantial public health benefits. Using a gas stove and oven for just an hour generates indoor air pollutant levels that exceed Californiabased ambient air quality thresholds in 90% of modeled scenarios. High indoor air pollutant levels can cause respiratory effects. For example, in homes with gas stoves, children are at increased risk of having asthma by 42%. To develop a healthier project and ensure that the project is consistent with measure E-2 of the City’s Climate Action & Adaptation Plan, Sac Metro Air District recommends that no new natural gas infrastructure be constructed as part of the proposed project.

ADV11. Due to the health risks posed by public exposure to asbestos, demolition and renovation of existing buildings is subject to Sac Metro Air District Rule 902, to limit asbestos exposure during these activities. Sac Metro Air District staff is available to review notifications and answer asbestos related questions, either by emailing [email protected], or calling 279-207- 1122.

ADV12. All projects are subject to Sac Metro Air District rules and regulations in effect at the time of construction. Please visit our website to find a list of the most common rules that apply at the construction phase of projects.

Projects undergoing any environmental review must implement Sac Metro Air District Basic Construction Emission Control Practices, also available on our website, to help avoid significant construction-related air quality impacts.

Table of Contents
Exhibit A: Project Plans
Adopted by the City of Sacramento City Council on February 24, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Attest:

N 00°41'23" W (BASIS OF BEARINGS) ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68

SUMMER DAY LANE
(A PRIVATE ALLEY) [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36
[435 BM 2]
LOT 35 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT Y
[435 BM 2]
LOT 37
[435 BM 2]
LOT 38
[435 BM 2]
LOT 39
[435 BM 2]
LOT 40
[435 BM 2]
LOT 41 [435 BM 2] LOT N
[435 BM 2]
LOT T

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O
O O O
O
O

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O
O O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
10" SS
12" W
10" SS 10" SS
12" W
10" SS S S S
D
D D
D
D D
N 89°33'33" E 363.03' N 00°41'23" W
N 89°33'33" E N 00°41'23" W 244.00' 25.00' 25.00'
363.03' 25.00' 25.00' 244.00' 365.50' 512.20'
N 89°33'33" E 96.50'
N 89°33'33" E 363.03' 50' I.O.D. FOR PUBLIC ROAD [185 PM 20] 12.5' P.U.E. [185 PM 20] 34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
B
- A
-
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE PROPOSED PRIVATE RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS

EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS EVA & PRIVATE RECIPROCAL ACCESS
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 EXISTING 12.5' PUE CL-EXISTING 25' ROW CL-EXISTING 25' ROW 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 33.50' 33.50' 30.50' 30.50' 40.00' 201.00' 35.50' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70'

64.00'

64.00'

64.00'

42.50' 32.00' 32.50' 30.50' 30.50' 32.00' 244.00' 30.50' 30.50'

64.00' 58.00'

64.00' 58.00'

58.00'

24.00' 59.00' 24.00' 40.00' 20.50' 23.58'

20.78'

24.00' 34.75' 34.71' 34.79' 34.75' 31.00' 56.97' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 33.50' 33.50'

64.00'

56.00' 118.00'

56.32'

56.63'

56.91'

56.46'

56.77'

57.06'

57.12'

57.27'

57.41'

57.55'

57.69'

57.83'

58.03' 24.00' 32.50' 45.00' 32.50' 32.50' 32.50'

56.20'

42.61' 244.00' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 35.50' 32.50'

31.00' 56.00' 30.50'

24.00' 56.00'

56.59'

60.00' 58.00'
118.00' 22.16' 27.50' 138.00'

31.00' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 31.00'

20.35' 20.83' 20.00'

58.55' 58.00' 58.58'
198.13' 20.01' 20.74' 21.83' 93.00'

56.00'

59.00' 30.50' 30.50' 32.00' 21.43' 27.50'

56.05' 19.50'

57.98' 32.70'

23.00' 30.50' 21.50' L1L2 L3 L4 L5
L6 L7
L8 L9 L10
L11
L12
L14 L13L15 C1
L16
C2
L17
C3
C4
C5
L18
L19
L20
C6 C7
L21
C8L22C9
L23
C10
L25
C11 C12
C13
L26 C14
L27 L29
L28
L30
L31 L33
L32
L34
L35
L36 L40L37L38L39
L41
L42 L43
LOT H

LOT A LOT B

LOT C LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
L44

CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
C12
C13
C14
LENGTH

6.89'

16.50'

41.05'

5.89'

10.61'

4.19'

3.14'

4.19'

3.14'

47.27'

16.50'

10.19'

6.31'

6.42'
RADIUS

42.00'

38.50'

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

2.00'

3.00'

2.00'

3.00'

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

42.00'
DELTA

9.40°

24.56°

56.01°

8.76°

15.79°
120.00°

60.00°
120.00°

60.00°

64.49°

24.56°

15.16°

9.39°

8.76°

LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
LENGTH

12.50'

12.50'

10.00'

10.00'

12.50'

5.66'

1.00'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.51'

3.59'

3.41'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

3.51'

3.50'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

2.75'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.00'

5.66'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

3.00'

4.00'

12.50'

17.00'

BEARING
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N45° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S81° 02' 16"E
S56° 29' 00"E
N30° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
S30° 26' 27"E
S56° 14' 50"W
N80° 47' 19"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S44° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S0° 41' 23"E
S0° 26' 24"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E

CURVE TABLE
50' ROW
N
0' 15' 30' 60'
SCALE:1"=30'

TENTATIVE MAP FOR THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
225-0150-055
3600 AIRPORT ROAD

SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
N
LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

EXISTING CENTER LINE

PROPOSED LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE
EXISTING 1-FT CONTOUR LINE
EXISTING 5-FT CONTOUR LINE

EXISTING TREE
ss ss
TENTATIVE MAP NOTES:

SUBDIVISION NAME: THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
(APN): 225-0150-055
PROPERTY OWNER / SUBDIVIDER:

PARAMDEEP SINGH
1469 EMERGING TECH LLC
4067 GLOSTER WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95834
APPLICANT/CIVIL ENGINEER:

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL, INC.

ANDREW MACDONALD
3010 LAVA RIDGE CT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661
PHONE: 916-978-4001
[email protected]
SITE SURVEYOR:

BARBER SURVEYING, INC.

SHANE R. BARBER
261 BOEING CT
LIVERMORE, CA 94551
PHONE: 925-344-6461
[email protected]
DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 2025
FLOOD PLAIN:

ZONE A99, SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA WITHOUT BASE
FLOOD ELEVATION.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 06067C0045J - JUNE 2015
FIRE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
POLICE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO - DISTRICT 2
SCHOOL DISTRICT:

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
PARK DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO
WATER DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO WATER
REFUSE DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO SOLID WASTE SERVICES
STORM DRAIN DISTRICT:

CITY OF SACRAMENTO DEPT OF UTILITIES
SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT:

SACSEWER
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING R-1A-SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED R-1A-PUD-SINGLE FAMILY
EXISTING USE:

RESIDENTIAL - SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED USE:

RESIDENTIAL - 32 LOTS
OPEN SPACE - 6 LOTS
PRIVATE ROADS - 2 LOTS
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING PARCEL AREA(S):
(APN): 225-0150-055 = 88,247 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PARCEL AREA(S):

EXISTING GROSS AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED NET AREA (32 LOTS) = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
TOTAL AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED DENSITY:

15.76 DU/ACRE (NET)
sd sd
w w
232
230

1. CURRENT ON-SITE CONDITION INCLUDES EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT WITH A DETACHED GARAGE AND SHED. THE EXISTING STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. THAT ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED/RELOCATED.

2. EXISTING SITE IS RELATIVELY FLAT WITH THREE SUB-SHED DRAINAGE

AREAS THAT SHEET FLOW SLIGHTLY FROM NORTHWEST TO WEST, FROM NORTH TO THE SOUTHWEST, AND FROM NORTHEAST TO SOUTHEAST.

3. SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICE WILL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING PUBLIC MAIN LINES IN TANZANITE AVENUE.

4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FROM INFORMATION FURNISHED IN A PARCEL MAP ENTITLED "MACHADO PARCEL MAP" FILED FOR RECORD ON OCTOBER 17, 2005 IN BOOK 185 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 20, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR

MATTERS OF RECORD NOT STATED IN SAID PARCEL MAP THAT MAY

AFFECT THE BOUNDARY LINES, EXCEPTIONS, OR EASEMENTS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY.

5. THE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY SHOWN HEREON WAS PERFORMED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHANE R. BARBER, LS 9097.

6. NO VERNAL POOLS OR WETLANDS EXIST ON THE SITE. THERE IS (4) 3"-4" TREES, (77) 6" TREES, AND (23) 8"-18" TREES ON-SITE.

7. DUE TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, ALL TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED, NONE ARE PROTECTED.

GENERAL MAP NOTES:

DATUM NOTE:

BASIS OF BEARINGS: NORTH 00°41'23" WEST TAKEN ON THE CENTERLINE

OF NATURITA WAY AS SHOWN ON THE FINAL MAP OF MACHADO SUBDIVISON VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 CITY OF SACRAMENTO BM 277-A2C (17.906') 12 ON-SITE PARKING STALLS ARE PROPOSED ALONG THE PRIVATE ALLEY ACROSS FROM LOTS 8-13. REFER TO SITE PLAN.

PARKING NOTE:
g g
e e

2.67'
⅊ ℄

EXISTING

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER

PROPOSED
5' SIDEWALK

PUBLIC ROAD SECTION - TANZANITE AVENUE A NOT TO SCALE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE

PROPOSED PARCEL INFORMATION
PARCEL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-12 13 14 15 16
LOT AREA (SF) 1882 1889 1884 1880 1875 1870 2025 1736 1946 1736 1909 1904 1729 LOT AREA (AC) 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.046 0.040 0.045 0.040 0.044 0.044 0.040 PARCEL # 17 18 19 20 21 22, 23 24 25 26, 27 28 29 30, 31 32 LOT AREA (SF) 1724 1720 1716 1824 2021 1919 1962 1885 1769 1856 2020 1919 1832 LOT AREA (AC) 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.046 0.044 0.045 0.043 0.041 0.043 0.046 0.064 0.042

LOTS A B C D E F G H
LOT AREA (SF) 700 1475 738 725 3561 3317 17619 566
LOT AREA (AC) 0.016 0.034 0.017 0.017 0.082 0.076 0.404 0.013 80 5 E COMMERCE WAY
TANZANITE AVE. AIRPORT RD.

TRUXEL RD.

SAN JUAN RD. AZEVEDO DR.

DUCKHORN DR.

PROJECT
SITE
1' BENCH
EX ±16.33'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±16'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±2.67'
EX ±5'
SW
DATE: 09/29/2025
DRAWN BY: RS

REVISIONS

DELTA DATE DESCRIPTION
1 - - 2
3 4
5 CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT (PUE) FOR DRY UTILITIES ONLY, AND A CITY WATER METER EASEMENT (WAE) WILL BE PROPOSED OVER AND 4' AND 10' ADJACENT TO THE ONSITE PRIVATE ALLEY. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS

AGREEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER THE PRIVATE ALLEY THROUGH PORTIONS OF LOT 1-32 AND LOTS A-H.

PUBLIC EASEMENT NOTE:
50' ROW
⅊ ℄

EXISTING

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER

PROPOSED
6' APRON

PUBLIC ROAD SECTION - TANZANITE AVENUE B NOT TO SCALE

EXISTING

12.5' PUE EX ±16.33'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±16'

TRAVEL LANE
EX ±2.67' EX ±5'
SW
DRIVEWAY 1" LIP SAWCUT PROPOSED

VERTICAL CURB

AND GUTTER
4' MIN. SAWCUT
4' MIN. MATCH EX MATCH EX

ROCKY LEDGE WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72 [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK [435 BM 2] LOT N
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd sd sd sdss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss ss sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
oe
oe
oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe oe
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W 12" SD
10" SS
12" W
10" SS
24" SD
12" SDS S S
D D
D
D 50' I.O.D. FOR PUBLIC ROAD [185 PM 20] 12.5' P.U.E. [185 PM 20]

O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 56.00' 33.50' 33.50' 30.50' 30.50' 40.00' 201.00' 35.50' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70'

64.00'

64.00'

64.00'

42.50' 32.00' 32.50' 30.50' 30.50' 32.00' 244.00' 30.50' 30.50'

64.00' 58.00'

64.00' 58.00'

58.00'

24.00' 59.00' 24.00' 40.00' 20.50' 23.58'

20.78'

24.00' 34.75' 34.71' 34.79' 34.75' 31.00' 56.97' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 30.50' 33.50' 33.50'

64.00'

56.00' 118.00'

56.32'

56.63'

56.91'

56.46'

56.77'

57.06'

57.12'

57.27'

57.41'

57.55'

57.69'

57.83'

58.03' 24.00' 32.50' 45.00' 32.50'32.50' 32.50'

56.20'

42.61' 244.00' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 32.70' 35.50' 32.50'

31.00' 56.00' 30.50'

24.00' 56.00'

56.59'

60.00' 58.00'
118.00' 22.16' 27.50' 138.00'

31.00' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 34.75' 31.00'

20.35' 20.83' 20.00'

58.55' 58.00' 58.58'
198.13' 20.01' 20.74' 21.83' 93.00'

56.00'

59.00' 30.50' 30.50' 32.00' 21.43' 27.50'

56.05' 19.50'

57.98' 32.70'

23.00' 30.50' 21.50' L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
L6 L7
L8 L9 L10
L11
L12 L13L14 L15 C1
L16
C2
L17
C3
C4
C5
L18
L19
L20
C6 C7
L21
C8L22 C9
L23
C10
L25
C11 C12
C13
L26
C14
L27 L29
L28
L30
L31
L32 L33
L34
L35
L36 L37L38 L39 L40
L41
L42 L43 PRIVATE ALLEY
1 1
1 1
1 1
3 3
3 3
4 4
4 4 PRIVATE ALLEY

11.8'
4 4
4 1
2 2

PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY
3 11.8' EXISTING 12.5' PUE 3.5'
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
4' 10'10'10'10' 10'10' 6'
4' 7.75' 0.5' 7.75' 0.5' 7.75' 0.5' 4' 0.5' 0.5'
6'
6'
8'
8'

11.2' 6.5' 0.5' 3.5' 3.5' 0.5' 0.5' 3.5' 0.5' 3.5' 3.5' 0.5' EXISTING 12.5' PUE 13.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 5'

11.2' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12' 5' 5'
20' EVA &

PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS
4' 4' 5' 3.5' 3.5' 3.5' 13.5' 20' 10' 13.5' 0.5' 3.5' 0.5' 3.5' 0.5' 5' 12'
12'
8' 13.5' 3.5' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 5.7' 8.5' 0.5'
34' PROPOSED
PUE & WAE 1'
12'
12'

12.8'

4.75' 3.5' 20'
12'

12.8'
12' 1' 1' 1' 1'

11.85'

11.72'

11.58'

11.43'

11.29'

11.15'

11.03' 11.01'

10.9'

10.77'

10.58'

10.44'

10.31'

10.18'
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
20' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS 3.5' 3.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' EXISTING 12.5' PUE EXISTING 12.5' PUE 119'
36' 4' 4'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
28' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6'
6' 6' 6' 6' 6' 6'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
7'
7'
11'
5'
5'
5'
5'
7'
11'
7'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
5'
34' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
24' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
24' PROPOSED

PUE & WAE
20' EVA & PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL ACCESS
4' 4' 3.5'
3' 4'
6'
4' 3.5'
20' EVA &

PRIVATE

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS 5'
5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' 0.5'

7.5'

7.43' 10' PROPOSED PRIVATE RECIPRICAL ACCESS 3'
PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2 PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2 PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
PLAN 2
18' TYP 5'
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C
LOT D
LOT E
LOT F
LOT G
1 2
L44 LINE TABLE
LINE #
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
L25
L26
L27
L28
L29
L30
L31
L32
L33
L34
L35
L36
L37
L38
L39
L40
L41
L42
L43
L44
LENGTH

12.50'

12.50'

10.00'

10.00'

12.50'

5.66'

1.00'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.51'

3.59'

3.41'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

14.54'

3.30'

16.27'

3.51'

3.50'

1.42'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

2.75'

4.00'

8.25'

4.00'

1.00'

5.66'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

12.50'

3.00'

4.00'

12.50'

17.00'

BEARING
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 41' 23"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N45° 26' 27"W
N0° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
N0° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S81° 02' 16"E
S56° 29' 00"E
N30° 26' 27"W
S89° 33' 33"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N30° 26' 27"W
N89° 33' 33"E
S30° 26' 27"E
S56° 14' 50"W
N80° 47' 19"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S0° 26' 27"E
S44° 33' 33"W
N0° 26' 27"W
S0° 26' 27"E
S0° 41' 23"E
S0° 26' 24"E
N89° 33' 33"E
S89° 33' 33"W
S0° 26' 27"E
N89° 33' 33"E

CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C11
C12
C13
C14
LENGTH

6.89'

16.50'

5.89'

10.61'

4.19'

3.14'

4.19'

3.14'

16.50'

10.19'

6.31'

6.42'
RADIUS

42.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

2.00'

3.00'

2.00'

3.00'

38.50'

38.50'

38.50'

42.00'
DELTA

9.40°

24.56°

8.76°

15.79°
120.00°

60.00°
120.00°

60.00°

24.56°

15.16°

9.39°

8.76°

CURVE TABLE

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/29/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
LOT SUMMARY:

EXISTING USE:

RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED USE:

RESIDENTIAL - 32 LOTS
OPEN SPACE - 6 LOTS
PRIVATE ROAD - 2 LOTS
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:

RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING PARCEL AREA(S):
(APN): 225-0150-055 = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PARCEL AREA(S):

TOTAL PROPOSED NET AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
TOTAL PROPOSED GROSS AREA = 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED DENSITY:

15.76 DU/ACRE (NET)
PROJECT SUMMARY:

SUBDIVISION NAME: THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
(APN): 225-0150-055
EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING R-1A SINGLE FAMILY
PROPOSED R-1A-PUD-SINGLE FAMILY
LEGEND

EXISTING PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING PARCEL LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

EXISTING CENTER LINE

PROPOSED LOT LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE

PROPOSED FENCE (SEE LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECT PLANS FOR DETAILS)

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP
O
C1.0

PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
N
80 5 E COMMERCE WAY
TANZANITE AVE. AIRPORT RD.

TRUXEL RD.

SAN JUAN RD. AZEVEDO DR.

DUCKHORN DR.

PROJECT
SITE

ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION KEYNO
CONSTRUCT STANDARD VERTICAL CURB.

CONSTRUCT ZERO CURB.

CONSTRUCT ROLLED CURB.

CONSTRUCT VERTICAL TO ROLLED CURB TRANSITION.
1 2
3 4

PROPOSED PARCEL INFORMATION
PARCEL # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-12 13 14 15 16
LOT AREA (SF) 1882 1889 1884 1880 1875 1870 2025 1736 1946 1736 1909 1904 1729 LOT AREA (AC) 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.043 0.046 0.040 0.045 0.040 0.044 0.044 0.040 BLDG. FOOTPRINT (SF) 1106 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 1068 NET BLDG. AREA (SF) 1658 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 1627 LOT COVERAGE (%) 58.8 56.5 56.7 56.8 57.0 57.1 52.7 61.5 54.9 61.5 55.9 56.1 61.8 FAR 0.88 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.94 0.84 0.94 0.85 0.85 0.94 PARCEL # 17 18 19 20 21 22, 23 24 25 26, 27 28 29 30, 31 32 LOT AREA (SF) 1724 1720 1716 1824 2021 1919 1962 1885 1769 1856 2020 1919 1832 LOT AREA (AC) 0.040 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.046 0.044 0.045 0.043 0.041 0.043 0.046 0.044 0.042 BLDG. FOOTPRINT (SF) 1068 1068 1068 1106 1068 1068 1106 1106 1068 1068 1068 1068 1106 NET BLDG. AREA (SF) 1627 1627 1627 1658 1627 1627 1658 1658 1627 1627 1627 1627 1658 LOT COVERAGE (%) 61.9 62.1 62.2 60.6 52.8 55.7 56.4 58.7 60.4 57.5 52.9 55.7 60.4 FAR 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.81 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.81 0.85 0.91

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68 [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59 [435 BM 2] LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
24" SD 12" SD
24" SD
12" SDS S
S
D D
D
D
D D 50' I.O.D. FOR PUBLIC ROAD [185 PM 20] 12.5' P.U.E. [185 PM 20] D
< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
< < <
< < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < < < < < < < < < < <
< < <
< < < <
< < < < < < < < < <
< < < <
< <

SD SD SD SD SD
D D SD

SD SD SD SD
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 2.1% 2.1%

2.4% 2.1%

2.0%

2.2%

2.1%

2.2%

2.7%

2.0%

2.2%

2.2%

2.0%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0% 2.0%

2.2%

2.2%

3.6% 3.6%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1% 2.3%2.5%

2.0%

2.1%

6.7%

4.2% 2.5% 3.7%

2.5% 5.2% 2.1%

2.1%

6.7%

1.6%

3.7% 1.2%

2.1%
20' EVA 20' EVA 20' EVA
10' 10' 10'
(17.67)S (18.01)S (17.90)S (17.76)S (17.66)S (17.78)S (17.83)S (17.83)S (17.67)S (17.13)S (16.81)S
(17.12)S
(15.81)S
(16.84)S
(16.75)S
(16.78)S
(17.09)S
(17.48)S
(17.24)S

17.22C
(17.19)S
(17.06)S
(17.04)S
(16.83)S
(16.80)S
(16.49)P
(16.79)S
(16.19)P
(16.30)S (15.95)C
(15.54)P
(15.24)C
(14.87)P
(16.06)FL (15.29)FL
(16.28)FL
FF=17.65

16.17P 16.17P 15.62P 15.62P

15.34RIM 14.89RIM

15.40GR

15.48GR

15.20GR

15.40GR 15.30GR

15.59FL

16.77P 16.83P 16.66P 16.57P 16.63P

16.21P

15.66P

15.56P

15.02P

16.16P

15.89P

15.73P

15.80P 15.80P

15.79P

15.78P

15.54P

15.66P

16.52FL

16.44P

16.52C

16.47C

15.87P

15.87C

15.69P

15.80P

15.49P
FF=17.70
FF=17.62
FF=17.84
FF=17.60
FF=17.43
FF=17.68
FF=17.68
FF=17.45
FF=17.62
FF=17.75 FF=18.05
FF=17.70
FF=17.44
FF=17.68 FF=17.67
FF=17.43
FF=17.68
FF=18.34
FF=17.66
FF=17.43
FF=17.60
FF=17.70
FF=17.62
FF=17.84
FF=18.07 FF=18.17 FF=18.03 FF=18.05 FF=18.10 FF=18.10 FF=18.04

15.50RIM

15.83RIM

15.95RIM

16.43P

16.86P

15.85P

15.92FL

16.23FL/HP

15.79FL

15.74RIM

15.57FL

15.74FL

15.45FL

16.24C

16.35C
(17.21)S
(17.17)S

17.12C

15.80C

16.13C

15.42C

16.44P

15.56FL

14.86FL

16.06TC

14.94TC

15.35TC

14.85FL

15.38RIM
17 17
17 171718
17 17
17 17
17 17
17 16
17 18
17 17
17 167
17 16
17 18
17 16
17 17
17 17
17 17
16 16
16 16 16
17 17 17 17
16 17 17 16 1717
1717
17 16
16 17
16 16
2 2
4 4
4 3
2 1
1 4
2 2
4 5
6 TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 3
TYP. 7
TYP. 7
TYP. 3 EXISTING 12.5' PUEEXISTING 12.5' PUEEXISTING 12.5' PUEEXISTING 12.5' PUE PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY

16.79P

2.2%

15.96P

15.63P

15.59P

15.48P

15.44P

15.54P

15.60P

15.78P

15.84P

16.52P

15.91P

16.54C

16.59C

16.58C

16.62P

14.88FL

14.96TC

15.10P
(16.29)P
(16.50)P (16.46)P
(16.42)P (16.39)P
(16.38)P
(15.51)P
(15.72)P
(15.69)P
(15.46)P (15.40)P
(15.64)P
(15.62)P
(15.40)P
(15.15)P
(15.23)P
(15.18)P
(15.11)P
(15.02)P
(15.21)P
(15.16)P
(15.16)P
(15.14)P
(15.14)P
(15.11)P
(15.05)P
(14.97)P
(15.09)P
(14.88)P
(14.96)P
(15.00)P

15.90RIM

16.39C

2.1%

2.2%

2.3%
LOT H

LOT A LOT B

LOT C LOT D

LOT E LOT F
LOT G

2.2%

2.2%
20'
EVA
(14.58)FL 4'
4 CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
EXISTING 1-FT CONTOUR
EXISTING 5-FT CONTOUR
PROPOSED 1-FT CONTOUR
PROPOSED 5-FT CONTOUR

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED EASEMENT

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN LINE

PROPOSED SWALE FLOWLINE

PROPOSED DRAIN INLET

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

DIRECTION OF GUTTER FLOW

PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW

PROPOSED OVERLAND RELEASE POINT
GRADING LEGEND:
35 34
35 34
D

CONCRETE ELEVATION

FLOWLINE ELEVATION

PAVEMENT ELEVATION

RIM ELEVATION

GROUND ELEVATION

TOP OF CURB ELEVATION

BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION

PROPOSED GROUND SLOPE

EXISTING GROUND SLOPE

RIDGE LINE/ HIGH POINT
X.X%
(X.X%)
R R
FF=???
???C
???FL
???P
???RIM
???S
???TC

1. FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS (FFE) ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE.

NOTES:
< < < <
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE/PARK (PERVIOUS AREA)

COMPOST AMENDED SOIL (PERVIOUS AREA)

PROPOSED PERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS ASPHALT

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
PROPOSED LOT AREA: 88,427 S.F. / 2.03 AC
PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA: 48,846 SF/ 1.12 AC (55%)
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 39,401 SF/0.91 AC (45%)*
· PERCENT IMPERVIOUS IS LESS THAN 73.5% (SEE BASIN 6 - CONVERSION OF SSWMM TO XPSWMM DRAINAGE MODEL, AT NODES 162 AND 163 IN WATERSHED W-162 AND W-163, FOR REFERENCE); THEREFORE NO ADDITIONAL

DETENTION MITIGATION IS REQUIRED
PARCEL AREA(S):

SD
C2.0

PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
PRELIMINARY STORM DRAIN KEYNOTES:

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET.

PROPOSED PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE. SIZE TO BE CONFIRMED AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT.

CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO NEW PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

CONNECT PROPOSED STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE.

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA DRAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 D

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68
UMMER DAY LANE [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59 [435 BM 2] LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
24" SD
10" SS
12" W 12" SD
10" SS 10" SS
24" SD
12" SDS S S
S
S
D D
D
D
D D 50' I.O.D. FOR PUBLIC ROAD [185 PM 20] 12.5' P.U.E. [185 PM 20] 12.5' PUE SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

W W W W W W W W W W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSS SS SS SS SS SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S

SS SSSS
W
W
S S
D
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
W
W
W
W

JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT

JT JT JT JT JT JT
JT
JT
JT
JT
D D
M
W

SS SS SS SS SS SSW

M M M M M
M
M
M
M
M
W

SS SSW SSW SSW
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 TYP. 3
TYP. 3
TYP. 3
2 2
2 2
5 5 5
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 6 5
5 3
3 3
2 4
3 3
2 5
5 TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
6 4 4
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1 TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 3
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1
TYP. 1 TYP. 1
TYP. 1
6 6 PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY

PRIVATE ALLEY
7 TYP. 1
4 4
4 4
LOT H

LOT A LOT B
LOT C
LOT D

LOT E LOT F
LOT G

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
C3.0

PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
LEGEND

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE

EXISTING WATER LINE

EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING ELECTRICAL LINE

EXISTING OVERHEAD LINE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE

PROPOSED WATER LINE

PROPOSED JOINT TRENCH

PROPERTY SETBACK

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

PROPOSED BLOW-OFF VALVE

PROPOSED GATE VALVE

PROPOSED WATER METER

PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

PROPOSED RP/DCDA

PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION

PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (PUBLIC ROAD)

PROPOSED OFFSITE CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED OFFSITE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY
ss ss
sd sd
w w

SS SS SS
W W
S
JT JT
W
g g
e e
CONCEPTUAL UTILITY NOTES:

1. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANG PENDING FURTHER DESIGN COORDINATION.

M
SS
SD
oe oe
W

PRELIMINARY SANITARY SEWER KEYNOTE
PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUT AND LATERAL STUB.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE.

PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT.

CONNECT TO PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE.

CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAIN.
1 2
3 4
5 6
PRELIMINARY DRY UTILITY KEYNOTES:

APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE BOX AND ELECTRICAL, PHONE, CABLE, AND JOINT TRENCH. LOCATION SHALL BE APPROV BY SMUD AND OTHER DRY UTILITY PURVEYORS.

EXISTING ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE TO BE RAISED TO GRADE.

PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION TO MEET ALL SMUD REQUIREMENTS.

LOCATION SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SMUD.

EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURE TO REMAIN.

EXISTING STREETLIGHT TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED AS NEEDED.

EXISTING COMMUNICATION LINES, UTILITY POLE WITH GUY WIRE, AND OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES TO BE RELOCATED AS NEEDED.
1 2
3 4
5 6
PRELIMINARY WATER KEYNOTES:

PROPOSED 1" WATER SERVICE AND METER.

PROPOSED WATER LINE.

CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN.

PROPOSED GATE VALVE.

PROPOSED BLOW-OFF VALVE.

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RAISED TO GRADE.
1 2
3 4
5 6
S

ROCKY LEDGE WALK

NUCLA WAY
[344 BM 18]
LOT 78
[344 BM 18]
LOT 77
[344 BM 18]
LOT 76
[344 BM 18]
LOT 75
[344 BM 18]
LOT 74
[344 BM 18]
LOT 73
[344 BM 18]
LOT 72
[344 BM 18]
LOT 71
[344 BM 18]
LOT 70
[344 BM 18]
LOT 69
[344 BM 18]
LOT 60
[344 BM 18]
LOT 61
[344 BM 18]
LOT 62
[344 BM 18]
LOT 63
[344 BM 18]
LOT 64
[344 BM 18]
LOT 65
[344 BM 18]
LOT 66
[344 BM 18]
LOT 67
[344 BM 18]
LOT 68 [435 BM 2] LOT X
[435 BM 2]
LOT 36 GRASSY HOLLOW WALK
[344 BM 18]
LOT 59 [435 BM 2] LOT N

JOHN SING JR FAMILY TRUST

LANDS OF
[20240719 O.R. 9908]
O O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O
O O
O sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
sd
sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd sd
O
25' PUBLIC ROAD &

UTILITY EASEMENT
[1212 O.R. 28]
5' SBC EASEMENT [185 PM 20]
PROPOSED 5'

SMUD EASEMENT AIRPORT ROAD (PUBLIC)

TANZANITE AVENUE
(PUBLIC) NATURITA WAY (PUBLIC)

MACHADO

SUBDIVISION MACHADO SUBDIVISION
24" SD 12" SD
60" SD 24" SD
12" SDS S S
S
S
D D
D
D
D D 50' I.O.D. FOR PUBLIC ROAD [185 PM 20] 12.5' P.U.E. [185 PM 20] D

SD SD SD SD SD
D D SD

SD SD SD SD
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1 24
23 22
21 29
25 26
27 28
30 31
32 2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.0%

2.0%

2.0%

2.0%

2.1%

2.0%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1% 2.1%

2.8%

3.6% 3.6%

2.2% 2.2%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1% 2.1%

2.1%

2.5%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.7%

2.7%
DMA 1

2.03 AC

PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY PRIVATE ALLEY

3.4%

3.4%

2.2% 2.2%

2.2%

2.2%

2.2%
LOT H

LOT A LOT B LOT C LOT D

LOT E LOT F
LOT G

CIVIL ENGINEERING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

CARTWRIGHT NOR CAL
3010 LAVA RIDGE COURT, SUITE 160
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
T (916) 978-4001
WWW.CARTWRIGHTENGINEERS.COM

THE ENCLAVE AT AIRPORT ROAD
3600 AIRPORT RD

SACRAMENTO, CA
DATE: 09/08/2025
SCALE: 1"=20'
DRAWN BY: RS
0'
SCALE:
10' 20' 40'
1"=20'
N
C4.0

PRELIMINARY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
LEGEND

PROPERTY LINE

EXISTING EASEMENT

RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVEMENT

PROPOSED COMPOST AMENDED SOIL

PROPOSED LANDSCAPE

PROPOSED CONCRETE DRIVEWAY

PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PROPOSED HOLLYWOOD STRIP