2026-00790 [Contract] I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000): Agreement for Advancement of Measure A Funds with Sacramento Transportation Authority, Supplemental Agreement, Budgetary Adjustments, and Environmental Mitigation Agreements and Surety [Two-Thirds Vote Required]

City of Sacramento
City Council - 2PM Report
915 I Street Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org
File ID: 2026-00790 4/14/2026
[Contract] I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000): Agreement for Advancement of Measure A Funds with Sacramento Transportation Authority, Supplemental Agreement, Budgetary Adjustments, and Environmental Mitigation Agreements and Surety [Two-Thirds Vote Required]
File ID: 2026-00790
Location: Construction of a new multimodal bridge crossing over the Sacramento River at Railyards Boulevard, located upriver from the existing I Street Bridge; District 4 Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution by two-thirds vote authorizing the City Manager or designee to: 1) waive the requirement for 10-day posting of agreements over $1 million pursuant to City Code section 4.04.020(c) and Council Rules of Procedure Chapter 7, Section E.2.d; 2) increase the revenue and expenditure budgets of the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) by $250,000,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703); 3) increase the revenue and expenditure budgets of the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) by $25,000,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704); 4) execute the Agreement For Advancement of Measure A Funds with the Sacramento Transportation Authority for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000); 5) execute the Reservation Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Credits from the Hamilton Bend Mitigation Bank with Westervelt Ecological Services, LLC for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) in an amount not-to-exceed $3,367,500; 6) execute the Credit Sale and Transfer Agreement for mitigation credits with Westervelt Ecological Services LLC (Zacharias Ranch) for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) in an amount not-to-exceed $3,260,400; 7) establish a surety in the form of an escrow account or line of credit in an amount not-to-exceed $10,000,000 for mitigation costs identified by California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); and 8) execute Supplemental Agreement No. 42 to City Agreement No. 2014-0244 with Mark Thomas and Company Inc. for an amount not-to-exceed $2,518,458, bringing the agreement’s total not-to-exceed amount to $23,643,116.

Contact: Philip Vulliet, Supervising Engineer, (916) 808-5092, [email protected]; Ofelia Avalos, Engineering Services Manager, (916) 808-5054, [email protected]; Department of Public Works
Presenter: None (Staff available for questions)
Attachments:

Page 1 of 5 ends

File ID: 2026-00790 4/14/2026
1-Description/Analysis
2-Resolution
3-Agreement For Advancement of Measure A Funds - Sacramento Transportation Authority 4-Reservation Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Credits - Westervelt Ecological Services LLC. (Hamilton Bend)
5-Credit Sale and Transfer Agreement - Westervelt Ecological Services LLC. (Zacharias Ranch) 6-Supplemental Agreement - Mark Thomas and Company (2014-0244-42) Description/Analysis
Issue Detail: The I Street Bridge Replacement Project represents a significant, once-in-a-generation public infrastructure investment to construct a new movable bridge over the Sacramento River, providing an essential connection between the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento. The project supports major transit-oriented and infill development within the regional core and will facilitate community revitalization, economic growth, and improved mobility. The new crossing will enhance multimodal access to regional rail and transit facilities, major healthcare centers, and riverfront amenities, while providing safe and direct routes for pedestrians, cyclists, emergency responders, and transit vehicles. Construction activities are anticipated to generate several hundred high-wage jobs and contribute to sustained regional economic activity. Funding for the project is primarily derived from federal and state transportation programs.

Over the past decade, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has programmed federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds to support preliminary engineering, environmental permitting, and right-of-way acquisition. Most recently, Caltrans issued a Funding Commitment Letter identifying $250 million in HBP funds for project construction. In addition, on June 27, 2025, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) awarded $25 million in competitive State Local Partnership Program (LPP) funds. Contractor bids for construction are currently being solicited, with construction anticipated to begin this summer.

These recent funding commitments enable the City to proceed with construction in 2026, contingent upon the establishment of interim financing to support construction cash-flow needs. Caltrans has subsequently issued a revised Funding Commitment Letter outlining conditions and timelines for federal reimbursement. Under this structure, the City is expected to receive at least $40 million annually, subject to statewide HBP delivery and future federal transportation act reauthorization.

Because projected annual construction expenditures exceed annual programmed reimbursements, the City requires a financing agreement through the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) to ensure sufficient working capital. Financing costs incurred by the City, such as interest, are not eligible for reimbursement from grant funds.

Staff recommend execution of an agreement with STA to advance Measure A funds and establish the framework and terms for subsequent financing implementation agreements. This action will allow STA to initiate procurement of financing proposals for future City review and potential approval. Staff will return to the City Council later this year with specific financing agreements requiring Council

Page 2 of 5 ends

File ID: 2026-00790 4/14/2026
action.

An overview of these forthcoming financial actions was previously presented to the City Council on July 29, 2025. Additionally, the Council approved the CTC baseline agreements and the Caltrans funding commitment letter at its September 16, 2025 meeting.

On June 27, 2025, the CTC approved $25 million in LPP competitive grant funding, and the allocation of those funds was finalized at the CTC’s March 15, 2026 meeting.

Environmental mitigation procurement is also required before issuance of permits necessary to begin construction. City staff and the consultant team have identified the most cost-effective mitigation banks for acquisition of required credits. Mitigation purchase and reservation agreements are needed to fulfill these requirements. For mitigation reservations, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requires a surety equal to the full cost of the mitigation credits prior to permit issuance. CDFW also requires additional surety for mitigation elements outside of bank purchases, including those benefiting white sturgeon habitat. These sureties may be provided through a line of credit or an escrow account naming CDFW as a party.

Mark Thomas and Company was awarded a professional services agreement (City Agreement No. 2014-0244) in March 2014 to provide preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and final design services. As the project enters the construction phase, a supplemental agreement is required to provide continued design support and public outreach throughout construction.

Policy Considerations: General Plan Policy M-5.1 Regional Mobility System states that the City shall partner with adjacent cities and other partners to plan and operate a cohesive regional mobility system. Policy M-5.3 Bridges states that the City shall maintain existing bridges and plan and seek funding for new bridges, when appropriate, to improve multimodal connectivity and provide for emergency evacuation routes.

This project will provide a new multi-modal bridge, crossing the river between C Street in West Sacramento to Railyards Boulevard in Sacramento. The new bridge is included in the Mobility Element of the General Plan, the Railyards Specific Plan, Transportation Priorities Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan.

Economic Impacts: The project supports regional economic development by improving access to the Railyards development area and surrounding employment centers. Construction activities are expected to generate construction employment and related economic activity. There is no direct impact to the City General Fund associated with this action.

Environmental Considerations:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): The City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the I Street Bridge Replacement

Page 3 of 5 ends

File ID: 2026-00790 4/14/2026
Project in compliance with CEQA on June 25, 2019 (Resolution No. 2019-0276). Following certification of the EIR, Staff filed a Notice of Determination with the Sacramento County Clerk on July 2, 2019. The current action consists of steps to implement the project that was approved and is consistent with the analysis contained in the certified EIR. No further environmental review is required.

As a responsible agency the City of West Sacramento also has permit jurisdiction or authorization over certain aspects of the project. The City of West Sacramento approved the EIR on August 7, 2019, and adopted the Findings and Notice of Determination authorizing the project within their jurisdiction. On November 16, 2022, the City of West Sacramento approved minor revisions to the local circulation access.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): The project is funded in part by federal funds. As a result, the project is also subject to requirements of the NEPA. Caltrans is the delegated lead agency for NEPA documentation. On June 10, 2019, Caltrans approved a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) / Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Project pursuant to the requirements of NEPA. The NEPA document was revalidated by Caltrans in February 2023 and September 2025.

Sustainability: The project is consistent with the City’s sustainability goals to support direct connections that support infill development, promote walking and bicycling, and access to transit. The project will reduce dependence on private automobiles, decrease the use of fossil fuels, and help meet air quality standards by providing an array of transportation choices near jobs for a balanced, healthy city.

While supporting substantial new infill development, the bridge will result in an overall reduction in Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) and support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants.

Commission/Committee Action: The I Street Bridge Replacement Project was reviewed by the Active Transportation Commission on June 29, 2019, and on September 17, 2020. The project was presented to the Disabilities Advisory Commission for review and comment on May 4, 2022.

Comments included consideration of sidewalks connecting to the bridge be accessible and review of any gaps in the sidewalk network approaching the bridge.

Rationale for Recommendation: The Agreement for Advancement of Measure A Funds with the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) establishes the framework, conditions, and roles and responsibilities of each partner agency for the solicitation and procurement of project financing agreements for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000). This agreement, along with the subsequent financing agreement, is necessary for the City to deliver the project through construction while awaiting reimbursement from programmed state and federal grant sources.

City Council approval of the mitigation bank purchase agreements with Westervelt Ecological

Page 4 of 5 ends

File ID: 2026-00790 4/14/2026
Services, as well as the surety instruments required by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), is necessary to secure environmental permits and allow construction to begin as planned in 2026.

Project construction will also require ongoing support from the designers of record and continued public outreach efforts. City Council approval of a supplemental agreement with Mark Thomas and Company is needed to ensure these services are in place prior to the start of construction activities.

City Council approval is further required for the associated budgetary adjustments.

Financial Considerations: The estimated total cost to complete the I Street Bridge Replacement is approximately $317,000,000. With the increase of the revenue and expenditure budgets by $250,000,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703) and by $25,000,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704), there will be sufficient funding to execute a supplemental agreement with Mark Thomas and Company for design support and public outreach services during construction, execute the mitigation bank purchase and reservation agreements with Westervelt Ecological Services Inc. for an amount not-to-exceed $6,627,900, and establish surety for the mitigation purchases that are subject to reservation agreements, as well as additional mitigation costs, as required by CDFW.

There is no financial commitment associated with the Agreement for Advancement of Measure A Funds with the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA). Staff will return to City Council for approval of any financing agreement that is subsequently procured through STA as discussed in the terms of this agreement.

Local Business Enterprise (LBE): Not applicable.

Page 5 of 5 ends

Version Dated 7/27/2025.

RESOLUTION NO.

Adopted by the Sacramento City Council

I STREET BRIDGE REPL ACEMENT PROJECT (T15 136000): AGREEMENT F OR

ADVANCEMENT OF MEASU RE A FUNDS WITH SACR AMENTO TRANSPORTATIO N

AUTHORITY, SUPPLEMEN TAL AGREEMENT, BUDGE TARY ADJUSTMENTS, AN D

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AGREEMENTS AND SURETY

BACKGROUND

A. The I Street Bridge Replacement Project is a once-in-a-generation investment that will construct a new movable bridge over the Sacramento River, linking the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento. This transformative project supports major transit- oriented and infill developments adjacent to the regional core, enabling the creation and revitalization of communities, jobs, and opportunities for employment, entertainment and recreation.

B. The new bridge will enhance access to regional rail and transit facilities, major healthcare centers and riverfront amenities, while providing safe, direct routes for cyclists, pedestrians, emergency responders, and transit vehicles. The project will generate hundreds of high-paying construction jobs and stimulate regional economic growth. It is funded primarily through federal and state transportation programs.

C. The federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) provides funding for replacement of aging bridges. Caltrans has authorized $250 million in HBP funds for construction of the I Street Bridge Replacement Project.

D. The I Street Bridge Replacement Project was approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for grant funding from the 2024 Local Partnership Competitive Program and received $25 million in construction funding at the June 27, 2025, Commission meeting. The funds were allocated to the project at the March 15, 2026 CTC meeting.

E. Recent funding commitments will allow the City to begin construction in 2026. Because construction costs are expected to exceed the annual programmed reimbursement from grant funding, a financing agreement through the Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) is necessary to maintain working capital for construction costs.

Financing costs such as interest incurred by the City while borrowing funds are not grant fund eligible. This agreement will allow STA to begin procurement of financing agreements with lenders for City review and approval. Staff will return to the City Council later this year for approval of any specific financing contract award or financial commitment.

Version Dated 7/27/2025.

F. Securing environmental mitigation is also required for the issuance of environmental permits allowing the project to begin construction. City staff and the project consultant team, have identified the most cost-effective mitigation banks for purchase of the required mitigation credits. Purchase agreements and reservations agreements are needed to meet the project’s mitigation requirements.

G. For reservation agreements, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) requires a surety in the amount of the full mitigation cost prior to permit issuance. This surety may come in the form of a line of credit, or fund deposit into an escrow account to which CDFW is a named party.

H. Mark Thomas and Company was awarded a professional services agreement (City Agreement No. 2014-0244) in March 2014 to provide preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, and final design for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project.

With the project entering the construction phase, a supplemental agreement is needed to provide design support and public outreach throughout the construction process.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the revenue and expenditure budget of the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) by $250,000,000 (Federal Capital Grants, Fund 3703).

Section 2. The City Manager or designee is authorized to increase the revenue and expenditure budget of the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) by $25,000,000 (Other Capital Grants, Fund 3704).

Section 3. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Agreement for Advancement of Measure A Funds with the Sacramento Transportation Authority for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000).

Section 4. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Reservation Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Credits from the Hamilton Bend Mitigation Bank with Westervelt Ecological Services, LLC for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) in an amount not-to-exceed $3,367,500.

Section 5. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Credit Sale and Transfer Agreement with Westervelt Ecological Services, LLC (Zacharias Ranch) for the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (T15136000) in an amount not-to-exceed $3,260,400.

Version Dated 7/27/2025.

Section 6. The City Manager or designee is authorized to establish a surety in the form of an escrow account or line of credit in an amount not-to-exceed $10,000,000 for mitigation costs identified by California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Section 7. The City Manager or designee is authorized to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 42 to City Agreement No. 2014-0244 with Mark Thomas and Company Inc. for an amount not-to-exceed $2,518,458, bringing the agreement’s total not-to-exceed amount to $23,643,116.

Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 1 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

Agreement For Advancement of Measure A Funds
to the I Street Bridge Replacement Project
This Agreement is entered into as of [Insert Date], by and between the Sacramento Transportation Authority, a local transportation authority duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the “Authority”), and the City of Sacramento, a municipal corporation and California chartered city (the “City” and together with the Authority, the “Parties”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City plans to construct the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (the “Project”), a new movable bridge over the Sacramento River, enhancing multimodal connectivity; and
WHEREAS, the City has advised the Authority that the Project construction cost is estimated to be approximately $300 million.

WHEREAS, primary funding for the Project is expected to come from $250 million in federal funding from the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) (the “Grant Funding”); and WHEREAS, because the G rant Funding is only eligible to reimburse prior Project expenditures, and the California Department of Transportation, the entity that is distributing the Grant Funding, applies a $40 million cap to annual reimbursements below expected Project construction expenditures (more particularly described in Attachment #1 and #2), the City need s interim funding to pay certain Project construction costs until the City is reimbursed from the Grant Funding; and
WHEREAS, the City has advised the Authority that it does not have the capacity with its General Fund to provide for interim funding of the Project itself; and WHEREAS, the Authority administers the Measure A local transportation sales tax program; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that certain Project construction costs are eligible for Measure A funding (the “Eligible Measure A Project Costs”) under the following categories of the Authority’s Transportation Expenditure Plan (the “TEP”): the Local Arterial Program, the Local Freeway Interchange Congestion Relief Upgrade Program, the Traffic Control and Safety Program, the Safety, Streetscaping, Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Program and the City Street and County Road Maintenance Program (collectively a nd as more particularly Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 2 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

described in Attachment # 3 hereto, the “City’s Eligible Measure A Funds ”) and the Parties agree Attachment #3 is accurate; and
WHEREAS, the Authority is willing to advance the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds to the City from time to time as interim funding for Eligible Measure A Project Costs (the “Advances”), subject to the Authority successfully obtaining a revolving line of credit (the “LOC”) which will provide moneys for such Advances; and
WHEREAS, the Authority is willing to undertake commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the LOC from a lender, in the not to exceed principal amount described herein , to provide interim funding for the Eligible Measure A Project Costs , which the Authority expects to secure by a subordinate lien on Measure A sales tax revenues; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, upon the Authority successfully obtaining the LOC: (1) the Authority will draw from time to time on the LOC in the manner described herein to provide the City with interim funding for the Eligible Measure A Project Costs and this interim funding will be treated as Advances , (2) the City agrees to repay the Advances from the ﬁrst use of the Grant Funding, (3) to the extent that the Grant Funding is not available in a timely manner to repay the Advances, the Authority will repay the Advances by deducting the amount of the Advances from the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds in the future , (4) the term “Advances” as used herein includes principal and interest due under the LOC and reasonable fees and expenses of the Authority (including the reasonable cost of the Authority’s direct labor) and its advisors, and (5) if for any reason the Grant Funding is not , or would not be, available or eligible to pay any portion of the Advances when due, the Authority will deduct the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds that would have otherwise been allocated to the City in an amount sufficient to repay those portions of the Advances; and WHEREAS, the City acknowledges the importance of leveraging all available local funding sources to maximize funding of Project construction costs in the most cost-effective manner and therefore agrees to identify, prioritize, and utilize any Unexpected Revenues (as deﬁned herein) to the fullest extent feasible and legally permissible to minimize reliance on Advances or to repay outstanding Advances as described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE AUTHORITY AND THE CITY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals.

The Parties agree that the above Recitals are true and correct. The above Recitals are incorporated herein as though set forth as part of this Agreement.

2. Purpose
Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 3 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

This Agreement establishes the roles, responsibilities, and ﬁnancial commitments of the Parties in securing, repaying and managing interim funding for the Project.

3. Term
This Agreement shall remain in effect until all obligations of the Parties have been performed and fulﬁlled, unless terminated earlier by (i) either Party with written notice to the other Party prior to obtaining the LOC and (ii) mutual written consent of the Parties after obtaining the LOC; provided, that if Advances have been provided by the Authority to the City, the Agreement shall remain valid and in force until all Advances have been fully repaid by the City to the Authority, regardless of any other provision for termination.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Advances have not been provided by the Authority to the City within three years following obtaining the LOC or by the expiration date of the LOC, this Agreement shall automatically terminate unless the Parties agree in writing to extend the term.

4. Anticipated Financing Structure

4.1 The Authority, with the participation of the City of Sacramento, will use commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate the LOC with a lender, with a not- to-exceed principal amount estimated to be $95 million. The City acknowledges that the principal amount of the LOC is limited by the amount of the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds and will be subject also to lender approval.

4.2 The Authority expects to secure the LOC by a subordinate lien on the Measure A sales tax revenues to ensure more favorable ﬁnancing terms as compared to an LOC obtained by the City. The Authority expects that obtaining the LOC will not result in a downgrade of the ratings on the Authority’s existing senior debt. If the Authority determines that the LOC may result in a downgrade of the ratings on the Authority’s existing senior debt prior to obtaining the LOC, the Parties acknowledge that the Authority expects to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 3.

4.3 Once the LOC has been mutually selected by the Parties and is in effect, the Authority will draw upon the LOC to make Advances to the City upon written request by the City in accordance with the terms of the hereinafter described Implementation Agreement in the event that the Grant Funding or other funding sources are not yet available to pay Project costs. The term “Advances” as used herein includes principal and interest due under the LOC, fees and expenses of the LOC lender (including an anticipated unutilized fee for the LOC prior to any Advance) and reasonable fees and expenses of the Authority (including the reasonable cost of the Authority’s direct labor) and its advisors.

Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 4 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

4.4 The City represents and warrants to the Authority that it is legally permissible for the City to use the Grant Funding to repay the principal portion of the Advances.

The City agrees that the ﬁrst use of Grant Funding will be to repay the Authority for the principal portion of all Advances. The City agrees not to use Grant Funding for any other purpose while the principal portion of any Advances are outstanding under this Agreement. The City further agrees to prioritize the use of funding from any unexpected transportation revenues identiﬁed by the City in writing to the Authority that are eligible to pay Project construction costs, including but not limited to, any future voter-approved transportation sales tax measure funds, grants, or other funding sources not currently identiﬁed to fund Project construction costs (“Unexpected Revenues”) to minimize reliance on Advances or to repay outstanding Advances. The Parties agree that the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds will be used to pay for costs of issuance related to this Agreement, the Implementation Agreement and the LOC and will be used to pay interest due under the LOC, fees and expenses of the LOC lender and reasonable fees and expenses of the Authority (including the reasonable cost of the Authority’s direct labor) and its advisors. If for any reason the Grant Funding is not, or would not be, available or eligible to pay any portion of the Advances when due, the Authority will deduct from the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds that would have otherwise been allocated to the City an amount sufficient to repay those portions of the Advances.

4.5 The Parties agree to evaluate other ﬁnancing options if they offer more favorable ﬁnancing terms for the Project when compared to the LOC. In the event that such alternative ﬁnancing options are obtained, the Parties shall prioritize and utilize these options to the fullest extent before requesting Advances as described herein. The Parties shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that any alternative ﬁnancing options align with the overall objectives and timelines of the Project and comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

4.6 The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement will be supplemented or amended, amended and restated and/or replaced by a more detailed Implementation Agreement that is consistent with the terms of this Agreement at the same time the LOC is obtained.

5. Repayment and Risk Management

5.1 As described in Section 4.4, it is the intent of the Parties that, whenever available, the Grant Funding will be used to pay the principal portion of the Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 5 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

Advances and the Parties acknowledge that it is not legally permissible under current law to use the Grant Funding to pay interest due under the LOC, fees and expenses of the LOC lender and reasonable fees and expenses of the Authority (including the reasonable cost of the Authority’s direct labor) and its advisors. If for any reason the Grant Funding is not, or would not be, available or eligible to pay any portion of the Advances when due, the Authority will deduct the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds that would have otherwise been allocated to the City (without consent from the City, while providing courtesy notice to the City) in an amount sufficient to repay those portions of the Advances in the following order of priority, beginning with (1) the Local Arterial Program, (2) the Local Freeway Interchange Congestion Relief Upgrade Program, (3) the City Street and County Road Maintenance Program, (4) Traffic Control and Safety Program, and (5) Safety, Streetscaping, Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Program. The City acknowledges that the Authority may, as necessary, deduct the entire amount of the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds to repay the Advances due in any given period and that the Authority will deduct from the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds that amount necessary to pay for costs of issuance related to this Agreement, the Implementation Agreement and the LOC .

5.2 On an annual basis, the Authority will calculate the amount of the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds compared to (1) the not to exceed principal amount on the LOC and (2) the outstanding Advances and expected future Advances in the annual period. If this calculation shows that the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds will be less than either (1) or (2), the Authority will cease to draw on the LOC for any Advances in excess of the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds. In addition, the Authority may limit the maximum allowable LOC advances to the City, including by limiting the maximum draw under the LOC (with notice to the City of any such limit). This calculation will be updated and presented to the Authority Board annually as part of the STA Debt Review.

5.3 The reﬁnancing of outstanding amounts due under the LOC by ﬁxed-rate bonds may be considered by the Parties if reﬁnancing is determined to be more cost effective at a future date, and this option will be evaluated by the City as desired by the City and by the Authority as part of the annual STA Debt Review.

5.4 The City shall notify the Authority of Unexpected Revenues that could fund Project construction costs.

5.5 If Unexpected Revenues that are not otherwise restricted are identiﬁed that could fund the Project costs, the City agrees to apply those revenues towards Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 6 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

repaying outstanding Advances due hereunder or reducing the need for any future Advances.

6. Roles and Responsibilities

6.1 The Authority shall be responsible for using its commercially reasonable efforts to secure the LOC with concurrence by the City to provide interim funding for the Project in a principal amount not to exceed $95 million, processing disbursement requests for Advances received from the City, drawing on the LOC and making Advances to the City, and reporting. The City acknowledges that the Authority may elect not to obtain the LOC if the terms are not reasonable or acceptable to the Authority and the Authority acknowledges that the City may elect not to concur with the Authority obtaining the LOC if the terms are not reasonable or acceptable to the City.

6.2 The City shall be responsible for initiating disbursement requests for Advances to the Authority, managing construction of the Project, managing the Grant Funding, exploring additional Project funding sources, and repaying the Advances when due with Grant Funding, other funding sources or the City’s Eligible Measure A Funding.

6.3 The City agrees to use the Advances provided in accordance with this Agreement solely for Eligible Measure A Project Costs and to enter into a tax certiﬁcate to be executed upon execution of the LOC. The City will not allow the Advances to be used (for example, by lease or contract) in the trade or business of any non- governmental persons other than in their roles as members of the general public (i.e., no private business use of the Project). The City expects to use the Project for the purposes described herein and in the tax certiﬁcate for the entire useful life of the Project and will consult with the Authority prior to any change in use of the Project.

6.4 The City has not and will not ﬁnance any of the Project costs that will be funded under this Agreement by Advances with proceeds of other debt issued by the City or any other entity. The City understands that federal income tax restrictions generally limit the ability to use funds advanced hereunder for reimbursements of costs paid more than 18 months prior to the date of advance or with respect to an asset placed in service more than 18 months prior to such advance.

6.5 The City is not able to, and agrees not to or be deemed to, subordinate the Authority’s lien on any Measure A sales tax revenues or establish, transfer, pledge or assign any other claim upon such funds.

Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 7 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

7. Disbursement Protocol

7.1 The Parties agree that they will enter into a subsequent Implementation Agreement, consistent with the terms of this Agreement, that will detail the procedures and timing related to the disbursement of Advances to the City, including but not limited to the amount of notice City must provide to the Authority prior to receipt of the Advances, a description of when the Advances will be due, and the period of time without repayment of the Advances to the Authority that will trigger the commencement of the Authority deducting the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds, as described in Sections 4.4 and 5.1.

8. Reporting and Transparency

8.1 The Authority will report the outstanding Advances to the City on a quarterly basis. The Authority will provide the City with notice after any deductions of the City’s Eligible Measure A Funds have been made as described in Section 4.4 and

5.1 and with notice of the annual calculations made as described in Section 5.2.

8.2 The City will report on the anticipated amount of the Advances to the Authority on a quarterly basis. The City will provide prompt notice to the Authority of the receipt of any Grant Funding.

8.3 Both Parties agree to collaborate on public communications and stakeholder engagement related to the Project’s ﬁnancing plan.

8.4 Each Party shall provide reasonable advance notice of planned press releases, media events, and major public announcements and shall coordinate to include the Authority’s participation when feasible. Routine construction-period inquiries, and day-to-day communications shall not require advance coordination; however, the Parties shall check in no less frequently than monthly (or at key milestones) regarding upcoming communications and opportunities for Authority participation.

8.5 The City shall provide the Authority with reasonable advance notice of major construction milestones and public events, including but not limited to groundbreaking, structural completions, and opening ceremonies, to allow for media coordination and participation by the Authority.

8.6 During construction of the Project, the City shall install and maintain construction-phase signage or banners in prominent public view identifying Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 8 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

Measure A as a funding source, in accordance with the Authority’s Public Information Signage requirements in effect at the time of installation.

8.7 Upon Project completion and opening for public use, the City shall install reﬂective signage prominently displaying the message:
“MEASURE A – YOUR TRANSPORTATION DOLLARS AT WORK”
Such signage shall substantially comply with the Authority’s Public Information Signage requirements in effect at the time of installation and remain through all project warranty periods.

8.8 The City shall take photographs and video of the Project during construction and at key milestones identiﬁed by the City including at the start of construction and end of construction. The City shall provide such material to the Authority within ten (10) business days after capture, in a format suitable for public distribution by STA across its communication platforms, including STA’s website and social media. The City shall clearly identify Measure A as a funding source for the Project in all public-facing communications. This includes, but is not limited to, the City’s and/or Project’s official website, printed or digital materials provided to the public, and at project-related events. The City and the Authority shall coordinate on consistent public messaging regarding the use of Measure A funds. The City shall review public-facing communications related to Measure A to conﬁrm consistency with the agreed-upon messaging. Where groundbreaking, ribbon-cutting, or other ceremonial events are held, the Authority shall be provided a speaking role to highlight the use of Measure A funds.

8.9 The Parties agree to enter into any necessary subrecipient, or funding agreements required to access or disburse funds awarded for the Project and to comply with all terms and conditions of those fund sources.

9. Anticipated Timeline
• Spring 2026:
• City Council and Authority execute this Agreement
• City and Authority adopt reimbursement resolutions for federal tax law purposes
• City awards Construction contract
• Summer -Fall 2026:
• Authority with concurrence of the City solicits lender for LOC • Authority with concurrence of the City selects lender for LOC and negotiates documentation for LOC
• Authority consults with City on terms of LOC
Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 9 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

• Authority and City negotiate Implementation Agreement and any other relevant documentation
• Authority adopts resolutions authorizing the execution of the LOC and related agreements and the Implementation Agreement and related actions • City adopts resolutions authorizing the execution of the Implementation Agreement and related actions
• LOC is issued and City and Authority execute Implementation Agreement and Tax Certiﬁcate

Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 10 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF SACRAMENTO and the SACRAMENTO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY have executed this Agreement by their officers thereunto duly authorized as of the day and year ﬁrst written above.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Ryan Moore, Assistant City Manager

Approved as to Form

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Michael Fry, Senior Deputy City Attorney

Attest:

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Assistant City Clerk

Agreement: I Street Bridge Financing

Page 11 of 11 ends

4129-6269-0404.4

SACRAMENTO TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Kevin M. Bewsey, Executive Director

Recommended for Approval:

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Dustin Purinton, Chief Financial Officer

Reviewed and Approved as to Form

By: ____________________________________ Date: ____________________________ William Burke, Legal Counsel

Attachments:
#1 Signed High-Cost Bridge Agreement
#2 Highway Bridge Program Funding Tables
#3 I Street Bridge Replacement – Measure A Eligibility

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

DIVISION OF LOCAL ASSISTANCE
P.O. BOX 942874 , MS–1 | SACRAMENTO, CA 9427 4–0001
(916) 653-8620 | FAX (916) 654-2409 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov /programs/local-assistance

February 6, 2026

Mr. Ryan Moore
Assistant City Manager
City of Sacramento
915 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Mr. Moore:

Thank you for your ongoing partnership with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to deliver the I Street Bridge Replacement project (Project). We appreciate the City of Sacramento’s (City) leadership and continued coordination to advance this critical regional investment.

As you know, the City has a signed High Cost Agreement under the Local Highway Bridge Program (HBP) that commits federal funding to the construction phase of the I Street Bridge Replacement project at $20 million per year for 12.5 years, for a total commitment of $250 million. The City has indic ated that annual expenditures are anticipated to exceed $20 million and has requested a faster reimbursement schedule.

In response to the City’s request, Caltrans can accommodate an expedited reimbursement schedule that maintains the total commitment of $250 million while increasing annual reimbursements and shortening the HBP reimbursement schedule to seven years. The proposed schedule is outlined below.

Mr. Ryan Moore, Assistant City Manager
February 6, 2026

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Federal
Fiscal Year
Reimbursement
Amount
2026 $40,000,000
2027 $40,000,000
2028 $40,000,000
2029 $40,000,000
2030 $40,000,000
2031 $40,000,000
2032 $10,000,000
Total $250,000,000

Caltrans does not require a revision to the existing HBP High Cost Agreement to implement the proposed reimbursement schedule currently. All terms and conditions of the executed High Cost Agreement remain in full effect, except for the modification to the reimbursement schedule outlined herein.

The funding commitment shown above is the final cadence for this project . While we cannot authorize additional annual reimbursement amounts and exceed the total funding of $250 million, we will work closely with the City to ensure successful delivery within these agreed parameters.

Caltrans looks forward to continuing our close coordination with the City to implement the expedited schedule. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Dee Lam
Chief, Division of Local Assistance

cc: Marlon Flournoy, Deputy Director Planning and Modal Programs , Caltrans Sergio Aceves, Director, District 3, Caltrans
Sue Takhar, Deputy District Director, Planning and Local Assistance, Caltrans Keith Duncan, Chief, Division of Budgets, Caltrans
Zhongren Wang, Assistant Division Chief, Local Assistance, Caltrans Bob Baca, Acting Office Chief, Office of Federal Programs Local Assistance, Caltrans Bruno Costa, Chief, Local Assistance, Engineering and Analysis , Caltrans

I Street Bridge Replacement – Measure A Eligibility
Project
Improvements
Local Arterial
Program
Traffic Control
& Safety
Program
Safety,
Streetscaping,
Pedestrian and
Bicycle
Facilities
City Street and
County Road
Maintenance
Total Measure
A Eligible
Costs
Earthwork for Trail,
Levee, and
Roadway
Maintenance
Y Y Y $476,685 $476,685
Roadway and Trail
Pavement and
Curb and Gutter
Maintenance
Y Y Y $1,307,187 $1,307,187
Remove and
Replace Retaining
Wall along at Bike
Trails
Y Y Y $17,405,469 $17,405,469
Approach Structure
Sacramento Side
$7,741,733 $4,300,963 $5,053,631 N $17,096,327
Bridge - Moveable
Span
$36,564,886 $19,244,677 $43,621,267 N $99,430,830
Existing Viaduct
Bridge Removal
Y Y Y $1,301,639 $1,301,639
Traffic Signal and
Lighting
Maintenance and
Improvement
Y Y Y $1,340,900 $1,340,900
Landscaping
Maintenance
Y Y Y $516,506 $516,506
Signing and
Striping
Improvements
(includes overhead
signs)
Y $388,028 Y N $388,028
Bridge Aesthetic
Lighting
Y $2,750,000 Y N $2,750,000
Storm Drainage
Improvements
Y $140,113 Y N $140,113
Subtotals $44,306,619 $26,823,781 $48,674,898 $22,348,386 $142,153,684 Notes:

1. Measure A Eligible Costs include construction and construction management costs associated with the listed Project Improvements.

2. All Project Improvements are located entirely or partially within Sacramento County. For improvements partially located within Sacramento County, only the proportional share of costs attributable to the Sacramento County portion is included as Measure A Eligible Costs.

3. The Project Improvements and associated Measure A Eligible Costs are eligible under multiple Measure A programs.

The City documented the Project Improvements’ alignment with the Measure A Transportation Expenditure Plan and Definitions of Eligible Expenditures to STA’s satisfaction.

4. For purposes of evaluating funding availability by program, eligibility is indicated either by a specific dollar amount (where applicable) or by “Y” (eligible) / “N” (not eligible). For the Approach Structure (Sacramento Side) and Bridge – Moveable Span, costs were allocated based the transportation use of the deck. As an example, vehicular barrier rail and shoulder areas were identified as eligible for the Measure A Traffic Control & Safety Program

5. The Project Improvements and associated Measure A Eligible Costs reflect anticipated costs based on the engineer’s estimate and corresponding bid items. Costs include bid items directly tied to the improvements (e.g., roadway excavation and imported borrow) as well as bid items necessary to complete the work (e.g., construction surveys, mobilization, and traffic control systems).

Error! Unknown document property name. 1

RESERVATION AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF CREDITS

FROM THE HAMILTON BEND MITIGATION BANK

This Reservation Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Credits from the Hamilton Bend Mitigation Bank ( "Agreement") is entered into as of _____ day of __________, 2026 ("Effective Date" ) by and between the CITY OF SACRAMENTO ( "Buyer"), and WESTERVELT ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Westervelt").

RECITALS

A. Westervelt is in the process of developing and obtaining resource agency approvals for a mitigation bank commonly referred to as the Hamilton Bend Mitigation Bank (the "Bank") located in Colusa County, California.

B. Specifically, Westervelt is seeking approval from United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Fisheries (“NOAA”), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“ Corps”), and the California Department of Fish and Wildlif e (“ CDFW” and, together with the Service, NOAA and the Corps, collectively, the “Resource Agencies”) to sell certain credits (each a “Credit” and collectively the “Credits”) from the Bank (including the Buyer Credits, as defined below), pursuant to the Bank Enabling Instrument that will be entered into for the Bank (the “Bank Agreement”).

C. Buyer acknowledges and has full knowledge that the Bank is not yet approved by the Resource Agencies.

D. Buyer is seeking to implement a project described as the I Street Bridge Replacement Project (the "Project"), and seeks to compensate for the impacts of the Project (the "Project Impacts" ) by reserving the right to purchase 8.27 “ Riverine Riparian Reestablishment” Credits, 1.24 “Riverine Riparian Reestablishment with Salmonids” Credits, and 6 VELB Credits from the Bank (the "Buyer Credits") in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Buyer and Westervelt hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1.

RESERVATION OF BUYER CREDITS

1.01. Reservation for Purchase and Sale. Westervelt shall reserve the Buyer Credits for their purchase by Buyer from Westervelt for a period of thirty-six (36) months after the Effective Date (the “ Reservation Period ”) on terms and conditions specified in this Agreement. If Westervelt obtains approval of the Bank from the Resource Agencies within Error! Unknown document property name. 2

the Reservation Period (as in may be extended pursuant to Section 1.02 below), then the Reservation Period shall automatically be further extended until the Closing has occurred as described in Section 1.05 below.

1.02. Reservation Period Extension. Westervelt anticipates approval of the Bank by the Resource Agencies will occur within the initial 36-month Reservation Period. If for whatever reason, Westervelt is unable to obtain approval of the Bank from the Resource Agencies within the initial 36-month Reservation Period, the Buyer will have the option, as Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy, to either (a) extend the Reservation Period for one period of six (6) months (any further extensions of the Reservation Period shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the parties) by providing written notice thereof to Westervelt prior to expiration of the initial Reservation Period, or (b) absent such extension, this Agreement shall terminate at the end of the initial Reservation Period, and in the event of such termination Buyer will receive a refund of the Deposit.

1.03. Purchase Price. The total purchase price ("Purchase Price") for the Buyer Credits shall be in an amount equal to Three Million Three Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,367,500.00) (i.e., $350,000 per Riverine Riparian Credit and $6,500 per VELB Credit).

1.04. Payment.

A. Deposit. Buyer shall deliver to Westervelt an amount of Six Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ( $673,500.00) (the "Deposit") within fifteen (15) days after the Effective Date. The Deposit shall be immediately nonrefundable to Buyer except to the extent otherwise provided in Section 1.02 above or

1.04.C below or , in the event that the Closing does _not occur due to a material default of Westervelt under this Agreement. The Deposit shall be applicable to the Purchase Price on the Closing Date.

B. Westervelt will notify Buyer in writing promptly after Westervelt obtains approval of the Bank by the Resource Agencies. Upon the date of such written notice, the Deposit shall become non-refundable.

C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, i f, for whatever reason, Westervelt is unable to send written notice to Buyer prior to expiration of the Reservation Period (as it may be extended as described above) that Westervelt has obtained approval of the Bank by the Resource Agencies, then upon the expiration of the Reservation Period the Deposit held by Westervelt shall be returned promptly to Buyer and this Reservation Agreement shall terminate without any further obligation or liability by Westervelt to Buyer or Buyer to Westervelt.

1.05. Closing Date. The parties agree that the Buyer Credits shall be purchased at a single closing, as more particularly described below (the “Closing” to occur on the “ Closing Date”). For the purposes of this Agreement, the "Closing Date" shall occur on a date selected by Westervelt that shall be on or before thirty (30) calendar days after the date that Westervelt notifies Buyer that it has obtained approval of the Bank by the Error! Unknown document property name. 3

Resource Agencies and has obtained approval for a credit release from the Bank for the Buyer Credits. If Buyer has not timely purchased the Buyer Credits as described in the Westervelt notice, then from and after the Closing Date, Westervelt shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, and upon such termination Westervelt shall have no further obligation to sell, and Buyer shall have no obligation to purchase, the Buyer Credits, and in which event Westervelt shall be free to sell the Buyer Credits to a third party, and Westervelt shall retain the Deposit as liquidated damages pursuant to Section 1.08.

1.06. Closing Deliverables. The parties shall exchange the following on each Closing Date:

A. Buyer's Deliveries. In addition to the Purchase Price Balance for the Buyer Credits, Buyer shall deliver to Westervelt signed copies of the closing documents required by the Bank Agreement for the sale of the Buyer Credits. Specifically, Buyer shall deliver a signed copy of the Agreement for Sale of Credits in the manner and form required by the Bank Agreement to effectuate the sale described herein, with the blanks therein filled out based upon the number of Buyer Credits actually being purchased by Buyer hereunder (the
"Closing Agreement" ). The purchase price reflected in the Closing Agreement shall be based upon the Purchase Price paid by Buyer hereunder for the Buyer Credits subject to the Closing, and the parties acknowledge and agree that the Buyer Credits sold to Buyer under the Closing Agreement and the purchase price paid by Buyer under the Closing Agreement are the same as, and not in addition to, the Buyer Credits and Purchase Price described in this Agreement.

B. Westervelt's Deliveries. Westervelt shall deliver to Buyer counter - signed copies of the closing documents required by the Bank Agreement for the sale of the Buyer Credits. Specifically, Westervelt shall deliver a signed copy of the Closing Agreement together with the documents described therein required to be delivered by Westervelt on the Closing Date.

C. Advance Sale. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the Project is not approved by the applicable governmental agencies as of the Closing Date, the Buyer Credits shall be purchased by Buyer “ in advance,” meaning that Buyer shall have purchased the Buyer Credits as of the Closing Date, and shall have the right to apply said Buyer Credits to the Project once it is approved. In such event, the Closing Agreement and related closing documents will reflect such advance sale. Buyer shall be solely respon sible for notifying the Resource Agencies of such application of said Buyer Credits to the Project (and concurrently with said notification to the Resource Agencies, Buyer shall provide a copy of such written notification to Westervelt).

D. Additional Instruments. Westervelt and Buyer shall each deposit such other instruments as are reasonably required to proceed with the closing and consummate the sale of the Buyer Credits in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

1.07. Closing Costs.

Error! Unknown document property name. 4

A. Borne by Westervelt. Westervelt shall pay its own legal and professional fees and fees of other consultants incurred with regard to this transaction.

B. Borne by Buyer. Buyer shall pay its own legal and professional fees and fees of other consultants incurred with regard to this transaction.

1.08. Buyer’s Default; Liquidated Damages. SHOULD THE CLOSE OF

ESCROW CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT FAIL TO BE

CONSUMMATED ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR

ANY REASON OTHER THAN A MATERIAL DEFAULT OF WESTERVELT, AND EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIED IN SECTION 1.04.C ABOVE, THEN

IN SUCH EVENT WESTERVELT SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE

THIS AGREEMENT, AND IN THE EVENT OF SUCH TERMINATION

WESTERVELT SHALL BE RELIEVED OF ANY OBLIGATION TO SELL THE

BUYER CREDITS TO BUYER, THE DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY PAID TO

WESTERVELT HEREUNDER AND ALL INTEREST THEREON SHALL BE

RETAINED BY W ESTERVELT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 1671, 1676 AND 1677 AND AS

CONSIDERATION FOR WESTERVELT KEEPING THE BUYER CREDITS OFF OF THE MARKET FOR SALE TO OTHERS. BUYER AND WESTERVELT

AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT

TO FIX THE ACTUAL DAMAGES THAT WESTERVELT MIGHT SUFFER IN THE EVENT OF BUYER'S DEFAULT HEREUNDER. UPON ANY SUCH

BREACH OR DEFAULT BY BUYER HEREUNDER AND SUCH TERMINATION

OF THIS AGREEMENT BY WESTERVELT, THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE

TERMINATED AND NEITHER PARTY SHALL HAVE ANY FURTHER RIGHTS

OR OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER, EACH TO THE OTHER, EXCEPT FOR THE RIGHT OF WESTERVELT TO RETAIN SUCH LIQUIDATED DAMAGES.

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR ABOVE, RECEIPT AND RETENTION OF THE

DEPOSIT SHALL BE THE SOLE, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES OF WESTERVELT IN THE EVENT OF ANY BREACH OR DEFAULT BY BUYER HEREUNDER.

THE PAYMENT AND RETENTION OF SUCH AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED

DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3369.

_______________ _________________
Buyer's Initials Westervelt's Initials

1.09. Westervelt’s Default . Should the Close of Escrow contemplated by this Agreement fail to occur on the Closing Date due to a breach of this Agreement by Westervelt where such default or breach is not cured by Westervelt within thirty (30) days after Westervelt’s receipt from Buyer of written notice of such default or breach, then (a) this Agreement shall not be terminated automatically, but only upon delivery to Westervelt of written notice of termination from Buyer, and (b) Buyer shall elect, as Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy to either: (i) so terminate this Agreement, in which Westervelt shall return to Buyer the Deposit ; or (ii) pursue an action for specific performance of this Agreement .

Error! Unknown document property name. 5

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall it be deemed to be a default of Westervelt hereunder if for any reason Westervelt is unable to obtain approval of the Bank from the Resource Agencies.

ARTICLE 2.

OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO BUYER CREDITS

2.01. Westervelt Obligations Re Bank Responsibilities . The Purchase Price includes, and Westervelt shall be solely responsible for, all costs associated with the mitigation provided by the Buyer Credits, including any easement, endowment, management and monitoring costs related to the Buyer Credits. Buyer shal l have no obligation by reason of the purchase of the Buyer Credits described herein, to support, pay for, monitor, report on, sustain, or otherwise be responsible for the success or continued expense or maintenance of the habitat represented by the Buyer Credits or the Bank.

Westervelt shall be fully and completely responsible for satisfying any and all conditions placed on the Bank and the Buyer Credits by the Resource Agencies . The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the Closing Date for each Buyer Credit purchased by Buyer.

2.02. Buyer Obligations Re Qualification of Buyer Credits . Buyer shall, at Buyer's sole cost and expense, take such actions as are reasonably necessary to ensure that the permits and/or biological opinion it is seeking for the Project identify the Buyer Credits as compensatory mitigation for the Project Impacts. Any failure of Buyer to obtain such permits or biological opinion shall be considered a default of Buyer hereunder and shall entitle Westervelt to retain the Deposit as liquidated damages in accordance with Section

1.08. 2.03. Exclusivity. Westervelt shall not sell or assign to any third party the Buyer Credits before the Closing Date, unless Buyer or Westervelt has rightfully terminated this Agreement, provided, however, that the foregoing shall not restrict Westervelt's right to sell or assign any Bank credits that are in addition to the Buyer Credits being acquired by Buyer hereunder.

ARTICLE 3.

MISCELLANEOUS

3.01. Termination Right. If Buyer fails to pay to Westervelt the Deposit as and when required hereunder, or if Buyer otherwise fails to proceed with the purchase of the Buyer Credits on or before the Closing Date, and such failure remains uncured for t hirty (30) calendar days after Buyer's receipt of written notice from Westervelt of such failure, then Westervelt shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement by sending written notice of termination to Buyer, and in the event of such termination Westervelt shall be entitled to retain the Deposit previously paid by Buyer to Westervelt as liquidated damages in accordance with Section 1.08 above, and thereafter neither Westervelt nor Buyer shall have any further rights or obligations hereunder.

3.02. Limitation on Liability. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Error! Unknown document property name. 6

Agreement, in no event will Westervelt or Buyer be liable to the other party for any indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages, or loss of profits or loss of goodwill, regardless of whether Westervelt or Buyer has been informed of the possibility of such damages or is negligent, and whether or not such damages were reasonably foreseeable.

3.03. Attorneys' Fees. The Buyer and Westervelt shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with this Agreement.

3.04. Captions. All section captions used in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not be considered in interpreting the provisions of this Agreement.

3.05. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and of the sale provided for herein.

3.06. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of Buyer and Westervelt, superseding any and all prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject matter contained herein, and Buyer and Westervelt hereby release each other from any and all rights, obligations and claims under such prior agreements. The Recitals first set forth above are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as part of the terms and provisions hereof.

3.07. Additional Documents. From time to time prior to and after the Closing Date, Buyer and Westervelt shall execute and deliver such instruments of transfer and other documents as may be reasonably requested by the other party to carry out the purpose and intent of this Agreement.

3.08 Notice. All notices, demands, requests, elections, approvals, disapprovals, consents or other communications which this Agreement contemplates, requires or permits either Buyer or Westervelt to give to the other shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, transmitted by email , or sent by first class, or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the respective parties, as follows:

Buyer: City of Sacramento
____________________________
____________________________
____________________________
Attn: __________________________
Email: _________________________

Westervelt: Westervelt Ecological Services, LLC
3636 American River Drive, Suite 120
Sacramento CA 95864
Attn: Hal Holland
Email: [email protected]

or to such other address or email as Buyer or Westervelt may from time to time designate Error! Unknown document property name. 7

by notice to the other party given in accordance with this section. Personally delivered notice shall be deemed delivered upon the delivery thereof; notice transmitted by email shall be deemed delivered upon sending provided that the sender has a confirmation of such transmission and deposits in the United States mail on the same day a copy of such notice by first-class mail, otherwise upon the receiving party's receipt of such mailing; and mailed notice shall be deemed delivered upon the earlier of (i) receipt or (ii) 72 hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail.

3.09 No Recordation. Buyer and Westervelt agree that neither this Agreement nor any memorandum thereof shall be recorded by either party.

3.10 Assignment or Subsequent Transfers. Buyer shall not assign, transfer or convey Buyer's rights and/or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written approval of Westervelt, which approval Westervelt may withhold in Westervelt's sole and absolute discretion. Any attempted assignme nt which is subject to Westervelt's approval and which is not approved by Westervelt shall be void and Buyer shall be deemed in default hereunder.

3.11 Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended, altered or modified except by mutual written consent of the parties to this Agreement.

3.12 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of Buyer and Westervelt.

3.13 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall remain in full force and effect.

3.14 Counterparts; Electronic/Facsimile Signatures . This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. An electronic email copy or facsimile of a duly executed copy of this Agreement shall be deemed for all purposes as receipt of an originally signed document,
and any such copy bearing an electronic email copy or facsimile signature shall be binding upon, and enforceable against, the party to be charged thereby.

3.15 Waiver. The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future right to enforce such provision or any other provision hereof.

3.16 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and be governed by, the laws of the State of California.

3.17 No Obligations to Third Parties. No party shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, nor shall this Agreement confer any rights upon, nor obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties to this Error! Unknown document property name. 8

Agreement.

3.18 Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by Buyer or Westervelt to create a relationship of principal and agent, partnership, joint venture or any other association between Buyer and Westervelt.

Error! Unknown document property name. 9

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Buyer and Westervelt have executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

BUYER:

City of Sacramento

By: _________________________
Name: _______________________
Title: _________________________

WESTERVELT:

WESTERVELT ECOLOGICAL SERVICES, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: ___________________________________
Name: ________________________________
Title: _________________________________

Page 1 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Credit Sale and Transfer Agreement

This Credit Sale and Transfer Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this _____ day of _____________, 2026, by and between Westervelt Ecological Services (“Bank Sponsor”) and City of Sacramento (“Purchaser”), jointly referred to as the “Parties,” as follows:

RECITALS

A. The Bank Sponsor has developed the Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank located in the town of Walnut Grove, Sacramento County, California (“Bank”); and

B. The Bank has been developed pursuant to that certain Bank Enabling Instrument (“BEI”) entered into by and among the Bank Sponsor, Westervelt Ecological Services (“Property Owner”), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”), the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), referred to individually sometimes as a “Signatory Agency,” and collectively as the “Signatory Agencies,” on October 21, 2024; and

C. The Bank is currently in good standing with the Signatory Agencies; and

D. The Bank Sponsor previously received approval from the Signatory Agencies to offer 404 Wetland, Pacific Salmon Essential Fish Habitat, and Shaded Riverine Aquatic credits from the Bank (“Credits”) for Sale (defined below) pursuant to the terms of the BEI and any amendments thereto; and

E. The BEI defines “Sale” as the sale of Credits by the Bank Sponsor, and a “Transfer” as the use or application of Credits to mitigate for a particular project’s impacts by a person or entity seeking the Transfer (the “Permittee”); and

F. Pursuant to the terms of the BEI, a Transfer may occur only if the Bank Sponsor has received: (i) a copy of the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) by the agency approving the use of the specified purchased Credits; and (ii) written notice from the Permittee that it is electing to use the specified purchased Credits toward the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) obligation (“Notice”); and Bank Sponsor has accepted the legal responsibility for providing the required compensatory mitigation of such permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s), if required; and

G. The Purchaser, as Permittee, is seeking to implement the project described in Exhibit A attached hereto (“Project”), which would unavoidably and adversely impact wetlands, and seeks to compensate for the loss of wetlands by purchasing 1.12 Freshwater marsh complex (SRA) credits and 8.2 Freshwater marsh complex (non-SRA) Credits (“Specified Credits”); and

H. The Purchaser and the Bank Sponsor wish to complete a Sale of the Specified Credits; and

Page 2 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

I. The Purchaser, as Permittee, wishes to Transfer the Specified Credits and to effect the Transfer, has provided to the Bank Sponsor a copy of the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) by the agency approving the use of the Specified Credits, identified in Exhibit A, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, to compensate for impacts resulting from the Project.

J. Requests for Credit Transfers associated with a NFMS permit or authorization must first be approved by NMFS, as indicated on page 4 below, prior to full execution of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Purchase Price: The purchase price for the Specified Credits shall be $3,260,400.00 (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price shall be paid by means acceptable to the Bank Sponsor on the Closing Date (defined below).

2. Acknowledgement of Sale and Transfer. On the Closing Date, Bank Sponsor shall deliver to Purchaser a fully executed Bill of Sale (Exhibit C) and Payment Receipt (Exhibit D).

3. Closing; Closing Date. The closing will occur on or before April 30, 2026, or such other date to which the Purchaser and the Bank Sponsor mutually agree in writing (the "Closing Date"). On the Closing Date, the Purchaser shall pay the Purchase Price to the Bank Sponsor and, upon receipt of the Purchase Price, the Transfer of the Specified Credits to mitigate for the Project shall occur and the Bank Sponsor shall deliver the fully executed Bill of Sale and Payment Receipt to Purchaser.

4. Submission to Signatory Agencies. Upon the Sale and Transfer of the Specified Credits, the Bank Sponsor shall submit to the Signatory Agencies and upload into the cyber repository in the Regulatory In-Lieu Fee and Bank Information Tracking System (“RIBITS”), copies of: a) this Agreement; b) the Bill of Sale; c) the Payment Receipt; and d) an updated ledger as required by the terms of the BEI. The Bank Sponsor shall enter this Sale and Transfer into the ledger in RIBITS.

5. Transfer. The Transfer of the Specified Credits shall be only for compensatory mitigation of the Project, and the Specified Credits may not be used as compensatory mitigation for any other project or purpose, except as set forth herein.

6. Responsibility for Compensatory Mitigation. Except for any permit/approval/authorization issued by CDFW, upon Transfer, the Bank Sponsor accepts the legal responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation specified in the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) identified in Exhibit A and attached as Exhibit B. The Purchaser, as Permittee, retains responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation specified in any permit/approval/authorization issued by CDFW, identified in Exhibit A, and attached as Exhibit B.

Page 3 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

7. Notice. This Agreement constitutes the notice provided for in Recital F.

8. Integration. The Parties agree that all negotiations, discussions, understandings and agreements heretofore made between them or their respective agents or representatives are merged in this Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto, and this written Agreement alone fully and completely expresses their agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the Parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement.

9. Termination. In the event the Purchaser has not delivered the Purchase Price to the Bank Sponsor on or before the Closing Date, this Agreement shall automatically terminate without the need for any further action by the Bank Sponsor, and the Bank Sponsor shall have no further obligations to the Purchaser under this Agreement. In addition, the Parties agree that if this Agreement terminates as set forth in this section, no Sale or Transfer of the Specified Credits shall have occurred.

10. Amendments and Modifications. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except by an agreement in writing signed by the Parties. Promptly after execution of this Agreement, the Bank Sponsor shall provide the Signatory Agencies a copy of each amendment or modification and upload the amendment or modification into the cyber repository in RIBITS. All amendments and modifications shall be appended to this Agreement.

11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of identical counterparts, each of which so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

12. Effective Date. This Agreement will become effective when signed by the last Party.

13. Miscellaneous.

A. The Sale and Transfer herein is not intended as a sale or transfer to the Purchaser of a security, license, lease, easement, or possessory or non- possessory interest in real property, nor the granting of any interest of the foregoing.

B. The Specified Credits shall be non-transferable and non- assignable and shall not be used as compensatory mitigation except as set forth in this Agreement.

C. By reason of the Sale and Transfer of the Specified Credits, Purchaser shall not assume the obligations of Bank Sponsor or Property Owner under the BEI.

Page 4 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

D. Any notice or other written communication given pursuant to this Agreement shall be delivered to the other Party by first class U.S. mail, certified or registered U.S. mail, facsimile mail, electronically, with mailed copy as follows:

Bank Sponsor:

Westervelt Ecological Services
3636 American River Drive Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95864

Purchaser:

City of Sacramento
________________
________________

E. By signing below, each Party warrants and represents that the person signing this Agreement on its behalf has authority to bind that Party and that the Party’s execution of this Agreement is not in violation of any bylaw, covenants, and/or other restrictions placed upon them by their respective entities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

BANK SPONSOR:

By: Date:

HAL HOLLAND

WESTERN REGION DIRECTOR

PURCHASER:

By: Date:

[PURCHASER CONTACT]
[TITLE]

Page 5 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE APPROVAL

This Transfer fulfills a portion of the Permittee’s proposed salmonid habitat conservation measures, as described in the NMFS’s Biological Opinion or Permit; NMFS File Number WCR-2018-9970 dated June 25, 2018. The NMFS verifies that the Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank is in good standing as of the signature date of this approval.

By: Date:

Printed Name:

Title:

Page 6 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Exhibit “A”
Description of Project to be Mitigated

A. Project information:

Project Name: I Street Bridge Replacement Project

Project Address and County: Sacramento and Yolo Counties

Project Type/Description: The project will replace the existing I Street Bridge between the cities of Sacramento and West Sacramento. The City will replace the current defunct bridge with a larger, safer bridge approximately 1,000 feet north of the existing one.

Amount and Type of Specified Credits being used: 1.12 Freshwater Marsh Complex (SRA) credits and 8.2 Freshwater Marsh Complex (non-SRA) credits.

B. Permit(s)/Approval(s)/Authorization(s) File Information:

Agency Name Permit/Approval
Number
Date of
Permit/Approval
Compensatory Mitigation
Obligations
☐ USACE
☐ USEPA
☐ NMFS WCR-2018-9970 June 25, 2018

Permittee will
compensate for
permanent impacts to
streambed designed
habitat at a ratio of 3:1 for
permanent impacts
☐ USFWS
☐ CDFW
☐ State Water
Board

☐ Regional Water
Board

☐ Other:

Page 7 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Exhibit “B”

Copy(ies) of Permit(s)/Approval(s)/Authorization(s)

Page 8 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Exhibit “C”

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

BILL OF SALE
Contract # SPK – 2020-00886

In consideration of $3,260,400.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Westervelt Ecological Services (“Bank Sponsor”) does hereby recognize that City of Sacramento (“Purchaser”), has acquired 1.12 Freshwater marsh complex (SRA) credits and 8.2 Freshwater marsh complex (non-SRA) credits from the Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank (“Specified Credits”) in the town of Walnut Grove, Sacramento County, California.

The Bank Sponsor represents and warrants that it has good title to the Specified Credits, has good right to sell the same, and that they are free and clear of all claims, liens, or encumbrances.

Bank Sponsor has received: (i) a copy of the
permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) by the agency approving the use of the Specified Credits identified in Exhibit B and attached as Exhibit C to the Sale and Transfer Agreement entered into by and between the Parties on (the “Agreement”); (ii) written notice from the Purchaser, as permittee, that it is electing to use the Specified Credits toward the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s) obligation; and (iii) Bank Sponsor has accepted the legal responsibility for providing the required compensatory mitigation of such permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s), if required.

The Bank Sponsor covenants and agrees to warrant and defend the Sale and Transfer (as defined in the Agreement) of the Specified Credits hereinbefore described against all and every person and persons whomsoever lawfully claiming the same.

The Bank Sponsor hereby Transfers the Specified Credits to compensate for impacts resulting from the project described in Exhibit A to satisfy the permit(s)/approval(s)/authorization(s)obligation identified in Exhibit A and attached as Exhibit B to the Agreement.

DATED:

Westervelt Ecological Services

By:

HAL HOLLAND, WESTERN REGION DIRECTOR

Page 9 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Page 10 of 10 ends

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

Page 9 of 10 ends

Exhibit “D”

Zacharias Ranch Mitigation Bank

PAYMENT RECEIPT

PURCHASER INFORMATION

Name: City of Sacramento
Address: ________________
Telephone: [Purchase Phone]
Contact: [Purchaser Contact]

PAYMENT INFORMATION

Payee: Westervelt Ecological Services
Payer: Caltrans, District 3
Amount: Three Million Two Hundred Sixty Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 ($3,260,400.00)
Method of payment: ☐Check No. ☐Money Order No.

Received by: Date:
(Bank Sponsor Signature)

Print Name:

Title:

January 29, 2026Mr. Jesse Gothan File: SA-14108City of Sacramento Department of Transportation 915 I Street, Room 2000Sacramento, CA 95814-2604RE:I STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (T15136000)SUPPLEMENT #42Dear Mr. Gothan:Per your request, we are submitting a supplemental request for Mark Thomas and Modjeski and Masters to provide bidding and construction support services. A detailed scope of services and cost proposal are attached from Mark Thomas and Modjeski and Masters.The total additional budget request is $2,518,457.14. The additional costs are outlined below, in the attached Mark Thomas budget summary, and in the attached cost proposals from Mark Thomas and Modjeski and Masters. PhaseTaskDescription of WorkCurrentBudgetSA 39New Budget913 001 Bidding 0.00 292,556.64 292,556.64913 002 Construction Support 0.00 1,208,118.19 1,208,118.19913 100 M&M: Construction Support 0.00 1,000,077.51 1,000,077.51913 199 M&M: Reimbursables 0.00 17,704.80 17,704.80Totals$ 0.00$2,518,457.14$2,518,457.14Mark Thomas and Modjeski and Masters are also requesting an update to our 10-H classifications and rates to align with the current actual direct labor rates for the proposed staff and classifications. The removal/addition of staff are detailed below. The remaining staff and classifications have been updated to reflect current direct labor rates. Our ICR and profit remain unchanged.

Mark Thomas would like to add the following classifications to the 10-H: ClassificationStaffRateSr. Graphic Manager TBD $69.98Sr. Graphic Designer TBD $55.13Graphic Designer TBD $42.00Mark Thomas has removed the following named staff from the 10-H. ClassificationNamePrincipal Matt BroganSr. Project Manager Eric FredricksonSr. Project Manager Ken DotySr. Project Manager Aaron SilvaTechnical Lead Todd LewisProject Manager Matthew MagawSr. Technician Janet DotySr. Project Manager Dan BlomquistProject Manager Jonathan HernandezSr. Graphic Designer Ryan DoranSr. Graphic Manager Deanna GibsonDesign Engineer II Aaron ClubbProject Landscape Architect Christopher CamarilloSr. Graphic Designer Omar PachecoSr. Engineering Manager David WiliamsRE/Structural Rep Nicholaus GravesDeputy District Manager Ben PorterCorporate Vincent MammanoSr. Survey Technician Norberty AvilaPrincipal TBDChief of Survey (OE-3)* John SandersCertified Chief of Survey Level 5 (OE-3)* Octavio SendaChief of Survey (OE-3)* Michael OliveiraChief of Survey (OE-3)* Steve BorgesChief of Survey (OE-3)* Jeffrey PhillipsChief of Survey (OE-3)* Keith AmbrosCertified Chief of Party Level 3-4 (OE-3)* Wayne Schoeffler Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Sincerely,MARK THOMASZach Siviglia Project ManagerAttachmentsMark Thomas Scope and Cost ProposalMark Thomas Updated Summary & 10-HM&M Scope and Cost proposalM&M Updated 10-H I Street Bridge Replacement City of Sacramento
1 OF 1
PHASE 913: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES Task 1. Bidding Mark Thomas will attend meetings, develop responses to bidder inquiries and develop amendments to the contract documents, as required, during the bidding phase. During this phase, Mark Thomas is also responding to the selected Construction Management firms constructability review comments that were received after the final plans and bid documents were released for bidding. Task 2. Construction Support Mark Thomas will provide Design Support During Construction (DSDC) services for the project. Work will include the following tasks: Request for Information During the construction phase, Mark Thomas will work with the Resident Engineer to respond to Request for Information (RFIs), provide clarification and interpretation of the plans and specifications. Submittal Reviews Mark Thomas will distribute and facilitate the review of shop drawings and product submittals among the design team, as well as attending field meetings during construction to review the issue in question. Contract Change Orders During the construction phase, Mark Thomas will work with the Resident Engineer to process and review Contract Change Orders (CCO) as changes become necessary. CCOs can be initiated for various reasons, such as discovering previously unmarked underground utilities or other manmade objects, contractor/agency-initiated changes, regulatory requirements, weather, or other contract delays, etc. Mark Thomas will develop CCO plans, specifications, and estimates to provide to construction staff for processing, as well as attend field meetings to review the issue in question. Record Drawings Following construction, Mark Thomas will prepare record drawings for records. The record drawings will be completed in AutoCAD and shall be based upon a marked up set of plans to be provided by the construction contractor and construction manager. Mark Thomas will provide one electronic copy and one set of printed Record Drawings. ASSUMPTIONS Overall Scope As the actual amount of time for DSDC is difficult to determine at this time, billing will be based on a time and materials basis. Mark Thomas will monitor the budget on a monthly basis and notify the City if Mark Thomas anticipates additional budget being needed. No field surveying work is required. Contractor will provide all field work for construction staking.

Page 1 of 6 ends

Check one: PrimeSA 42PrimeCONSULTANT Name:Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.Date:1/29/2026XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %38.04% 135.62% 173.66%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Approved Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee) A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):I Street Bridge Replacement PA/EDT15136000Sr. Project Manager Joe Streeper $86.87 $261.50Sr. Project Coordinator Jazmina Plant $50.30 $151.42Sr. Project Coordinator Jamie Gerow $51.73 $155.72Survey Manager II Travis Bohan $90.29 $271.80Sr. Project Engineer Ben Khalili $76.93 $231.58Project Surveyor III Rodney Unema $71.80 $216.14Project Surveyor I Mark Barry $62.58 $188.38Survey Specialist I Marisol Serrano $50.11 $150.84Graphic Designer Scott Kriletich $39.47 $118.81Assistant Surveyor I Anjali Kumar $42.52 $128.00LAUD Project Manager Jingwen Guo $66.47 $200.09Survey Manager I KC Offenberg $76.22 $229.44Landscape Architect Janice Heller $47.03 $141.57Design Engineer II Joel Ayala $47.83 $143.98Landscape Designer II Mitchell Lam $38.78 $116.74Sr. Technician Jose Valenzuela $61.06 $183.81Landscape Designer II Ryan Ortiz $39.36 $118.48Assistant Surveyor II Gilbert Pascua $46.40 $139.68Project Surveyor II Ryan Thompson $61.45 $184.98Sr. Technical Lead Jason Fong $94.49 $284.44Design Engineer I Jiayun Wu $42.09 $126.70Sr. Project Engineer Kyle Lundblom $66.03 $198.77Design Engineer II (Madeleine (Maddy) Phan $45.68 $137.51Design Engineer I Mahshid Haque $37.65 $113.34Division Manager Amber Collins $94.32 $283.93Technical Lead Austin Allen $71.94 $216.56Design Engineer II Christopher Sauvageu $46.10 $138.77Design Engineer II Elizabeth Cox $49.75 $149.76Design Engineer II Fabiola Lopez $46.73 $140.67Sr. Project Engineer Harfateh Grewal $67.91 $204.43Survey Technician III Raymond Shehan II $44.77 $134.77Survey Specialist III Annette Hovorka $69.13 $208.10Sr. Engineering Manager Matt Kleymann $120.95 $364.09Sr. Technician Erik Tanaka $61.13 $184.02Intern Edith Rivera $21.84 $65.74Sr. Project Manager Shira Rajendra $100.23 $301.72Sr. Project Manager Paul Mittica $98.01 $295.04Intern TBD $26.25 $79.02Technician TBD $39.12 $117.76Design Engineer I TBD $43.44 $130.77Page 2 of 6 Check one: PrimeSA 42PrimeCONSULTANT Name:Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.Date:1/29/2026XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %38.04% 135.62% 173.66%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Approved Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee) A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):I Street Bridge Replacement PA/EDT15136000Design Engineer II TBD $59.58 $179.35Sr. Technician TBD $62.58 $188.38Civil Engineering Designer TBD $69.46 $209.09Project Engineer TBD $63.20 $190.25Sr. Project Engineer TBD $80.57 $242.54Sr. Technical Engineer TBD $71.75 $215.99Project Manager TBD $90.46 $272.31Technical Lead TBD $78.61 $236.64Sr. Project Manager TBD $100.23 $301.72Sr. Technical Lead TBD $99.39 $299.19Engineering Manager TBD $113.78 $342.51Design Manager TBD $117.88 $354.85Sr. Engineering Manager TBD $123.40 $371.47Survey Division Manager TBD $125.49 $377.76Survey Manager II TBD $93.40 $281.16Survey Manager I TBD $79.95 $240.67Project Surveyor III TBD $87.13 $262.28Project Surveyor II TBD $78.23 $235.49Project Surveyor I TBD $69.19 $208.28Asst Surveyor II TBD $52.79 $158.91Asst Surveyor I TBD $48.18 $145.03Survey Specialist III TBD $86.51 $260.42Survey Specialist II TBD $66.42 $199.94Survey Specialist I TBD $51.25 $154.28Lead Survey Technician TBD $55.50 $167.07Survey Technician III TBD $57.40 $172.79Survey Technician II TBD $52.28 $157.38Survey Technician I TBD $48.62 $146.36Landscape Designer I TBD $29.66 $89.28Landscape Designer II TBD $47.95 $144.34Landscape Architect TBD $48.67 $146.51Sr. Landscape Architect TBD $59.28 $178.45LAUD Project Manager TBD $78.62 $236.67LAUD Division Manager TBD $94.66 $284.95Project Assistant TBD $36.39 $109.54Sr. Project Assistant TBD $48.59 $146.27Project Coordinator TBD $47.25 $142.23Project Accountant TBD $52.50 $158.04Sr. Project Coordinator TBD $60.59 $182.39Sr. Project Accountant TBD $57.20 $172.19Page 3 of 6 Check one: PrimeSA 42PrimeCONSULTANT Name:Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.Date:1/29/2026XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %38.04% 135.62% 173.66%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Approved Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee) A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):I Street Bridge Replacement PA/EDT15136000Project Accountant Manager TBD $80.00 $240.82CM Division Manager TBD $139.83 $420.92Sr. Graphic Manager TBD $69.98 $210.66Sr. Graphic Designer TBD $55.13 $165.96Graphic Designer TBD $42.00 $126.43XCertified Chief of Party Level 5 (OE-3)* TBD $63.09 $189.92XCertified Chief of Party Level 3-4 (OE-3)* TBD $62.80 $189.04XCertified Chief of Party Level 1-2 (OE-3)* TBD $62.50 $188.14XChief of Party (OE-3)* TBD $62.05 $186.79XChainman (OE-3)* TBD $52.58 $158.28XApprentice (1st Period (OE-3)* TBD $31.55 $94.97XApprentice (2nd Period (OE-3)* TBD $39.44 $118.72XApprentice (3rd Period (OE-3)* TBD $44.69 $134.53XApprentice (4th Period (OE-3)* TBD $47.32 $142.45

Page 4 of 6 ends

MacDonald ArchitectsMBK EngineersModjeski & Masters, Inc.Monument ROWTYLin InternationalVMS

Page 5 of 6 ends

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved fully loaded billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONSULTANT not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONSULTANT must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original. 4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONSULTANT is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONSULTANT shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. 7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONSULTANT for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONSULTANT for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.

Page 6 of 6 ends

Raquel G. Rich / Jesse GothanSUMMARY01/30/26A/P Processing Center File No. SA-14108City of Sacramento915 I Street, Fl 4 Re: Sacramento, CA 95814-2608P.O. 55410Invoice No.53183Engineering Services: August 26, 2024 thru September 29, 2024 Contract Exp12/31/26Original 2,088,805.00 Supplemental #3 39,076.00 Supplemental #5 70,374.82 Supplemental #6 39,352.37 Supplemental #7 16,500.00 Supplemental #8 407,915.33 Supplemental #10 493,407.50 Supplemental #13 54,390.02 Supplemental #16 723,536.63 Supplemental #17 50,000.00 Supplemental #18 12,612.90 Supplemental #19 1,497,823.32 Supplemental #26 10,000.00 Supplemental #27 14,978.17 Supplemental #28 8,623,455.35 Supplemental #33 115,409.59 Supplemental #35 6,699,916.81 Supplemental #36 82,006.23 Supplemental #39 85,098.17 Supplemental #42 - Pending 2,518,457.14 Total Contract Amount 23,643,115.35 100E. PROJECT MANAGEMENT001E.1 Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings42,503.29 54,686.29 54,686.29 54,680.19 0.00 54,680.19 6.10 100%002E.2 Agency Coordination25,056.60 25,056.60 25,056.60 25,050.14 0.00 25,050.14 6.46 100%003E.3 Project Manager Coordination13,152.20 13,152.20 13,152.20 13,140.45 0.00 13,140.45 11.75 100%004E.4 Project Schedule8,352.20 8,352.20 8,352.20 8,332.50 0.00 8,332.50 19.70 100%005E.5 Monthly Status Reports5,760.00 5,760.00 5,760.00 5,750.13 0.00 5,750.13 9.87 100%006E.6 Quality Control21,920.00 21,920.00 21,920.00 21,896.04 0.00 21,896.04 23.96 100%007E.7 Funding Assistance/Local Programs Compliance24,989.20 21,994.94 21,994.94 21,991.37 0.00 21,991.37 3.57 100%099MTCo REIMBURSABLES20,343.00 1,124.35 1,124.35 1,124.35 0.00 1,124.35 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 100162,076.49 152,046.580.00152,046.58 151,965.17 0.00 151,965.17 81.41 100%200G. DATA COLLECTION, MAPPING, SURVEYS001G.1 Data Gathering/Field Review23,981.4626,738.9426,738.9426,732.290.0026,732.296.65100%002G.2 Base Mapping18,530.8013,477.9213,477.9213,477.280.0013,477.280.64100%003G.3 Record of Survey50,388.2468,486.3268,486.3268,467.510.0068,467.5118.81100%100MTCo Reimbursables - PARC: RECORD OF SURVEY0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%200MTCo Reimbursables - ESP: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS0.00 7,397.20 7,397.20 7,397.20 0.00 7,397.20 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 20092,900.50 116,100.380.00116,100.38 116,074.28 0.00 116,074.28 26.10 100%250I. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING001I.1.1 - Travel Forecasting and Alternatives Screening5,472.20 5,429.01 5,429.01 5,429.01 0.00 5,429.01 0.00 100%002I.1.2 - Transportation Analysis5,472.205,461.365,461.365,461.360.005,461.360.00100%003I.2 Conceptual Bridge Alignments36,337.2038,428.6338,428.6338,409.020.0038,409.0219.61100%004I.3 Structure Type Feasibility Analysis24,252.6029,102.8829,102.8829,102.880.0029,102.880.00100%005I.4 Conceptual Bridge Architecture and Aesthetics9,927.40 32,655.28 32,655.28 32,655.28 0.00 32,655.28 0.00 100%006I.5 Conceptual Traffic Handling and Demolition Plans38,460.80 28,434.36 28,434.36 28,434.36 0.00 28,434.36 0.00 100%007I.6 Preliminary Cost Estimates35,523.0031,055.5131,055.5131,055.510.0031,055.510.00100%008I.7 Hydraulic and Hydrologic Studies5,472.203,874.203,874.203,874.200.003,874.200.00100%009I.8 Geotechnical Engineering Studies7,137.446,753.646,753.646,753.640.006,753.640.00100%010I.9 30% Plans, Structure Advance Planning Studies, & City Project Report122,099.53 123,156.67 123,156.67 123,156.67 0.00 123,156.67 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 250290,154.57 304,351.540.00304,351.54 304,331.93 0.00 304,331.93 19.61 100%310J. RIGHT OF WAY SUPPORT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING001J.1 Right of Way Map17,973.4025,162.7625,162.7625,141.630.0025,141.6321.13100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 31017,973.40 25,162.760.0025,162.76 25,141.63 0.00 25,141.63 21.13 100%320K. UTILITY COORDINATION SUPPORT FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING001K.1 Utility Coordination17,212.4017,212.4017,212.4017,210.150.0017,210.152.25100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 32017,212.40 17,212.400.0017,212.40 17,210.15 0.00 17,210.15 2.25 100%400F. NEPA/CEQA DOCUMENTATION001F.1 Bridge Location Feasibility Study Report21,477.00 21,477.00 21,477.00 21,470.08 0.00 21,470.08 6.92 100%002F.2 Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) Form5,189.22 5,189.22 5,189.22 5,150.56 0.00 5,150.56 38.66 99%003F.3 Technical Studies26,474.40 26,474.40 26,474.40 26,434.83 0.00 26,434.83 39.57 100%004F.4 Environmental Document (NEPA/CEQA)15,456.60 15,456.60 15,456.60 15,455.78 0.00 15,455.78 0.82 100% I Street Bridge Replacement Project (PN: T15136000), Contract No. 2014-0244

005F.5 Permitting Agency Coordination15,456.60 15,456.60 15,456.60 15,437.72 0.00 15,437.72 18.88 100% SUBTOTAL PHASE 40084,053.82 84,053.820.0084,053.82 83,948.97 0.00 83,948.97 104.85 100%440H. PUBLIC RELATIONS 001H.1 Stakeholder Outreach9,836.60 9,836.60 9,836.60 9,832.75 0.00 9,832.75 3.85 100% 002H.2 Public Meetings22,118.60 22,118.60 22,118.60 22,116.07 0.00 22,116.07 2.53 100% 003H.3 Kiosks4,094.00 4,094.00 4,094.00 4,030.61 0.00 4,030.61 63.39 98% SUBTOTAL PHASE 44036,049.20 36,049.200.0036,049.20 35,979.43 0.00 35,979.43 69.77 100%780SUBCONSULTANTS 100AIM: E.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TEAM (PDT) MEETINGS23,680.00 23,680.00 23,680.00 23,680.00 0.00 23,680.00 0.00 100% 101AIM: H.1 STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH13,290.00 13,290.00 13,290.00 13,290.00 0.00 13,290.00 0.00 100% 102AIM: H.2 PUBLIC MEETINGS49,490.00 39,037.16 39,037.16 39,018.54 0.00 39,018.54 18.62 100% 199AIM: REIMBURSABLES3,500.00 13,952.84 13,952.84 13,951.26 0.00 13,951.26 1.58 100% 200BCI: F.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES25,120.00 22,230.32 22,230.32 22,229.31 0.00 22,229.31 1.01 100% 299BCI: REIMBURSABLES0.00 2,889.68 2,889.68 2,889.68 0.00 2,889.68 0.00 100% 300CALLANDER: I.4 CONCEPTUAL BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE AND AESTHETICS30,225.00 1,648.51 1,648.51 1,648.51 0.00 1,648.51 0.00 100% 399CALLANDER: REIMBURSABLES0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 400F&P: I.1.2 - TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS175,593.62 170,113.62 170,113.62 170,113.62 0.00 170,113.62 0.00 100% 499F&P: REIMBURSABLES0.00 5,480.00 5,480.00 5,480.00 0.00 5,480.00 0.00 100% 500GEI: I.8 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDIES51,446.00 51,146.00 51,146.00 51,146.00 0.00 51,146.00 0.00 100% 599GEI: REIMBURSABLES0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 600ICF: E.1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TEAM (PDT) MEETINGS19,466.00 27,810.86 27,810.86 27,810.86 0.00 27,810.86 0.00 100% 601ICF: F.1 BRIDGE LOCATION FEASIBILITY STUDY SUPPORT9,975.00 9,680.52 9,680.52 9,680.52 0.00 9,680.52 0.00 100% 602ICF: F.2 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY (PES) FORM4,759.00 4,759.07 4,759.07 4,759.07 0.00 4,759.07 0.00 100% 603ICF: F.3 TECHNICAL STUDIES296,210.00 274,884.19 274,884.19 274,884.19 0.00 274,884.19 0.00 100% 604ICF: F.4 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (NEPA/CEQA)173,957.00 169,987.75 169,987.75 169,987.75 0.00 169,987.75 0.00 100% 605ICF: F.5 PERMITTING AGENCY COORDINATION21,287.00 18,813.95 18,813.95 18,813.95 0.00 18,813.95 0.00 100% 699ICF: REIMBURSABLES5,087.00 55,163.42 55,163.42 55,163.41 0.00 55,163.41 0.01 100% 700MACDONALD: I.4 CONCEPTUAL BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE AND AESTHETICS44,992.00 44,842.00 44,842.00 44,842.00 0.00 44,842.00 0.00 100% 799MACDONALD: REIMBURSABLES0.00150.00150.000.000.000.00150.000% 800MBK: I.7 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC STUDIES132,678.00 71,858.00 71,858.00 67,444.47 1,276.69 68,721.16 3,136.84 96% 899MBK: REIMBURSABLES42,585.0042,585.0042,585.000.0042,585.000.00100% 900M&M: I.3 STRUCTURE TYPE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS307,629.00 212,596.00 212,596.00 212,596.00 0.00 212,596.00 0.00 100% 999M&M: REIMBURSABLES0.006,834.596,834.596,834.590.006,834.590.00100% SUBTOTAL PHASE 7801,388,384.62 1,283,433.480.001,283,433.48 1,278,848.73 1,276.69 1,280,125.42 3,308.06 100%800SUPPLEMENTAL #3 400F&P: ADDITIONAL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS51,076.00 51,076.00 50,997.61 0.00 50,997.61 78.39 100% SUBTOTAL PHASE 8000.00 51,076.000.0051,076.00 50,997.61 0.00 50,997.61 78.39 100%810SUPPLEMENTAL #6 100VMS: VALUE ANALYSIS0.0034,541.3734,541.3734,541.370.0034,541.370.00100% 101VMS: REIMBURSEABLES3,617.253,617.253,617.250.003,617.250.00100% SUBTOTAL PHASE 8100.00 38,158.620.0038,158.62 38,158.62 0.00 38,158.62 0.00 100%820SUPPLEMENTAL #7 001A.1 Structure Type Selection Analysis18,097.6018,097.6018,097.560.0018,097.560.04100% 097REIMBURSABLES (EDMUNDO PUCHI)6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 100% 098REIMBURSABLES (PETE WHITFIELD)5,500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 100% 099REIMBURSABLES (KITTELSON)5,000.005,000.005,000.000.005,000.000.00100% 200M&M: A.1 STRUCTURE TYPE SELECTION ANALYSIS88,189.28 88,189.28 88,189.28 0.00 88,189.28 0.00 100% SUBTOTAL PHASE 8200.00 122,786.880.00122,786.88 122,786.84 0.00 122,786.84 0.04 100%830SUPPLEMENTAL #8001A.1 Type Selection Report103,335.75103,335.75103,318.810.00103,318.8116.94100%002A.2 Type Selection Meeting3,229.773,229.773,229.030.003,229.030.74100%003A.3 Updated General Plan11,273.5411,273.5411,247.690.0011,247.6925.85100%004B.1 VA Participation / Attend Meetings34,900.0534,900.0534,878.090.0034,878.0921.96100%005B.2 Respond to or Implement Comments28,942.45 28,942.45 28,927.39 0.00 28,927.39 15.06 100%100GEI: A.1 TYPE SELECTION REPORT11,126.5711,126.574,502.320.004,502.326,624.2540%101GEI: A.2 TYPE SELECTION MEETING1,880.08 1,880.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.08 0%200M&M: A.1 TYPE SELECTION REPORT91,191.01 91,191.01 91,178.74 0.00 91,178.74 12.27 100% 201M&M: B.1 VA PARTICIPATION/ATTEND MEETINGS12,915.15 12,915.15 12,915.15 0.00 12,915.15 0.00 100%202M&M: B.2 RESPOND TO OR IMPLEMENT COMMENTS45,934.48 45,934.48 45,934.48 0.00 45,934.48 0.00 100%299M&M: REIMBURSEABLES50.72 50.72 50.72 0.00 50.72 0.00 100%300ICF: EXTENDED PH 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SUBSURFACE EXCAVATIONS29,069.29 29,069.29 29,069.29 0.00 29,069.29 0.00 100%301ICF: PERMITTING AGENCY COORD- HISTORIC PRESERVATION8,454.14 8,454.14 8,454.14 0.00 8,454.14 0.00 100%399ICF: REIMBURSEABLES5.76 5.76 5.76 0.00 5.76 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8300.00 382,308.760.00382,308.76 373,711.61 0.00 373,711.61 8,597.15 98%840SUPPLEMENTAL #10001Project Management27,796.74 27,796.74 27,784.19 0.00 27,784.19 12.55 100%100ICF: CEQA/NEPA DOCUMENTATION40,484.51 40,484.51 40,484.51 0.00 40,484.51 0.00 100%101ICF: PERMIT APPLICATIONS22,199.40 22,199.40 22,198.46 0.00 22,198.46 0.94 100%199ICF: REIMBURSEABLES321.21 321.21 321.21 0.00 321.21 0.00 100%200GEI: DATA REVIEW & SITE RECONNAISSANCE15,992.24 15,992.24 15,885.79 0.00 15,885.79 106.45 99%201GEI: FIELD EXPLORATION78,964.02 78,964.02 78,939.76 0.00 78,939.76 24.26 100%202GEI: LABORATORY TESTING & PREPARATION OF EXPLORATION LOGS26,865.63 26,865.63 26,814.35 0.00 26,814.35 51.28 100%203GEI: GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT31,974.49 31,974.49 31,937.69 0.00 31,937.69 36.80 100%204GEI: PRELIMINARY SITE CHARACTERIZATION & PRE-ENGINEERING54.01 54.01 54.01 0.00 54.01 0.00 100%205GEI: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE/PERMITTING/PUBLIC OUTREACH SUPPORT11,620.93 11,620.93 1,308.53 0.00 1,308.53 10,312.40 11%206GEI: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & QUALITY CONTROL26,091.60 26,091.60 26,091.60 0.00 26,091.60 0.00 100%207GEI: SUB (TABER DRILLING)138,867.36 138,867.36 138,867.36 0.00 138,867.36 0.00 100%208GEI: SUB (BLACKBURN CONSULTING)28,425.00 28,425.00 26,740.31 0.00 26,740.31 1,684.69 94%299GEI: REIMBURSABLES7,178.80 7,178.80 7,178.80 0.00 7,178.80 0.00 100%300MBK: CVFPB ENCROACHMENT & SECTION 408 PERMITTING9,506.89 9,506.89 1,276.70 2,974.42 4,251.12 5,255.77 45%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8400.00 466,342.830.00466,342.83 445,883.27 2,974.42 448,857.69 17,485.14 96%850SUPPLEMENTAL #13001Prepare TIGER Application19,938.8219,938.8219,919.080.0019,919.0819.74100%099MT Reimburseables37,500.0037,500.0037,500.000.0037,500.000.00100%100MACDONALD: ADDITIONAL CONCEPTUAL BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE & AESTHETICS4,451.20 4,451.20 4,446.86 0.00 4,446.86 4.34 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8500.00 61,890.020.0061,890.02 61,865.94 0.00 61,865.94 24.08 100%860SUPPLEMENTAL #160011.0 Project Management40,437.1940,437.1940,423.020.0040,423.0214.17100%0022.0 Survey/Utility Coordination30,956.5530,956.5530,937.210.0030,937.2119.34100%0033.0 Engineering Studies41,399.3841,399.3841,378.140.0041,378.1421.24100%0044.0 Project Estimates26,146.4026,146.4026,130.120.0026,130.1216.28100%0055.0 35% Project Plans (Roadway)279,769.24279,769.24279,764.920.00279,764.924.32100%0066.0 35% Project Plans (Landscape)42,425.6442,425.6442,404.400.0042,404.4021.24100%099MT REIMBURSEABLES3,500.003,500.003,500.000.003,500.000.00100%100ICF: ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT59,803.4459,803.4459,803.440.0059,803.440.00100%101ICF: EXTENDED PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SUBSURFACE EXCAVATIONS31,924.68 31,924.68 31,924.68 0.00 31,924.68 0.00 100%102ICF: PERMITTING AGENCY COORD-HISTORIC PRESERVATION9,734.69 9,734.69 9,734.69 0.00 9,734.69 0.00 100%103ICF: CEQA/NEPA DOCUMENTATION58,281.4158,281.4158,281.410.0058,281.410.00100%199ICF: REIMBURSEABLES59.8759.8759.870.0059.870.00100%200M&M: PROJECT MANAGEMENT1,587.211,587.211,587.210.001,587.210.00100%201M&M: REVIEW & COMMENT ON RFQ/RFP5,488.05 5,488.05 5,488.05 0.00 5,488.05 0.00 100%202M&M: EVALUATE ARCHITECT'S QUALIFICATIONS & PREV PROJECT PORTFOLIOS4,694.44 4,694.44 4,694.44 0.00 4,694.44 0.00 100%203M&M: EVALUATE ARCHITECT'S PROPOSED I-STREET BR CONCEPTS FOR AESTHETICS3,129.63 3,129.63 3,129.63 0.00 3,129.63 0.00 100%204M&M: EVALUATE ARCHITECT'S I-STREET BR CONCEPTS FOR CONSTRUCTABILITY & BUDGET IMPACT9,571.50 9,571.50 9,571.50 0.00 9,571.50 0.00 100%205M&M: ATTEND MTGS & INTERVIEWS IN SAC (3 MTGS) & CONFERENCE CALLS20,588.94 20,588.94 20,588.94 0.00 20,588.94 0.00 100%206M&M: COMPARE ARCHITECTS, SUMMARIZE & RECOMMEND SELECTION2,744.02 2,744.02 2,744.02 0.00 2,744.02 0.00 100%299M&M: REIMBURSEABLES4,098.044,098.044,098.040.004,098.040.00100%300F&P: PROJECT ESTIMATES0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%301F&P: 35% PROJECT PLANS (ROADWAY)22,459.08 22,459.08 22,459.08 0.00 22,459.08 0.00 100%302F&P: REIMBURSABLES50.2950.290.000.000.0050.290%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8600.00 698,849.690.00698,849.69 698,702.81 0.00 698,702.81 146.88 100% 870SUPPLEMENTAL #17096MT REIMBURSEABLES - DONALD MACDONALD ARCHITECTS0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%097MT REIMBURSEABLES - NEXT ARCHITECTS25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 100%098MT REIMBURSEABLES - DISSING WEITLING25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 100%099MT REIMBURSEABLES - TY LIN INTERNATIONAL0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8700.00 50,000.000.0050,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 0.00 100%880SUPPLEMENTAL #18100AIM: ADDITIONAL PUBLIC OUTREACH12,062.90 12,062.90 12,056.96 0.00 12,056.96 5.94 100%199AIM: REIMBURSABLES550.00 550.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8800.00 12,612.900.0012,612.90 12,606.96 0.00 12,606.96 5.94 100%885SUPPLEMENTAL #19001Context Analysis & Theme Development24,231.21 24,231.21 24,227.08 0.00 24,227.08 4.13 100%002Schematic Design20,880.85 20,880.85 20,875.94 0.00 20,875.94 4.91 100%003Concept Development23,819.71 23,819.71 23,804.17 0.00 23,804.17 15.54 100%004Detailed Design33,487.33 33,487.33 33,477.29 0.00 33,477.29 10.04 100%005Design Drawings39,835.00 39,835.00 39,828.26 0.00 39,828.26 6.74 100%099MT REIMBURSABLES0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%100AIM: OUTREACH MANAGEMENT4,821.35 4,821.35 4,727.78 0.00 4,727.78 93.57 98%101AIM: STAKEHOLDER DATABASE & ONGOING COMMUNICATION2,985.87 2,985.87 2,965.89 0.00 2,965.89 19.98 99%102AIM: PUBLIC MEETINGS21,040.58 21,040.58 21,036.47 0.00 21,036.47 4.11 100%103AIM: VIRTUAL COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS16,592.51 16,592.51 16,566.95 0.00 16,566.95 25.56 100%104AIM: POP-UP WORKSHOPS9,019.15 9,019.15 9,017.68 0.00 9,017.68 1.47 100%105AIM: PRESS CONFERENCE AT PHASE 55,527.69 5,527.69 5,523.05 0.00 5,523.05 4.64 100%106AIM: PUBLIC INFORMATION & NOTIFICATION10,239.43 10,239.43 10,217.70 0.00 10,217.70 21.73 100%107AIM: PROJECT UPDATE NEWLETTERS3,518.86 3,518.86 3,372.88 0.00 3,372.88 145.98 96%108AIM: PROJECT WEBPAGE CONTENT2,738.582,738.582,723.360.002,723.3615.2299%199AIM: REIMBURSABLES4,650.004,650.004,648.660.004,648.661.34100%200M&M: MEETINGS45,438.0645,438.0645,438.060.0045,438.060.00100%201M&M: ARCHITECT COORDINATION125,404.55125,404.55125,404.550.00125,404.550.00100%202M&M: STRUCTURAL355,408.54355,408.54355,408.540.00355,408.540.00100%203M&M: MECHANICAL136,973.50136,973.50136,973.500.00136,973.500.00100%204M&M: ELECTRICAL128,306.21128,306.21128,306.210.00128,306.210.00100%205M&M: SPECS15,356.0915,356.0915,356.090.0015,356.090.00100%206M&M: COST ESTIMATE26,328.8626,328.8626,328.860.0026,328.860.00100%299M&M: REIMBURSEABLES4,137.374,137.374,137.370.004,137.370.00100%300TYLI: CONTEXT ANALYSIS & THEME DEVELOPMENT52,076.80 52,076.80 51,201.17 0.00 51,201.17 875.63 98%301TYLI: SCHEMATIC DESIGN61,372.2961,372.2958,856.680.0058,856.682,515.6196%302TYLI: CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT61,372.2961,372.2959,607.280.0059,607.281,765.0197%303TYLI: DETAILED DESIGN85,951.6185,951.6183,504.110.0083,504.112,447.5097%304TYLI: DESIGN DRAWINGS47,900.4147,900.4147,420.290.0047,420.29480.1299%399TYLI: REIMBURSEABLES10,590.7410,590.7410,590.740.0010,590.740.00100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8850.00 1,380,005.440.001,380,005.44 1,371,546.61 0.00 1,371,546.61 8,458.83 99%886SUPPLEMENTAL #24 - APPRAISALS001Appraisal Mapping24,802.3824,802.3824,796.230.0024,796.236.15100%199GEI: REIMBURSABLES4,013.294,013.294,013.290.004,013.290.00100%200ICF: GEOTECHNICAL BORE MONITORING7,950.33 7,950.33 7,950.33 0.00 7,950.33 0.00 100%299ICF: REIMBURSABLES993.75993.75993.750.00993.750.00100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8860.00 37,759.750.0037,759.75 37,753.60 0.00 37,753.60 6.15 100%887SUPPLEMENTAL #25 - FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT098MT REIMBURSABLES (Pointe C)10,362.5010,362.5010,362.500.0010,362.500.00100%099MT REIMBURSABLES (Sperry Capital)25,000.0025,000.0025,000.000.0025,000.000.00100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8870.00 35,362.500.0035,362.50 35,362.50 0.00 35,362.50 0.00 100%888SUPPLEMENTAL #26199AIM: REIMBURSABLES5,000.005,000.004,999.680.004,999.680.32100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8870.00 5,000.000.005,000.00 4,999.68 0.00 4,999.68 0.32 100%889SUPPLEMENTAL #27 - PLAN COORDINATION001Project Management12,395.16 12,395.16 12,394.89 0.00 12,394.89 0.27 100%002Project Development Team Meetings6,638.956,638.956,635.560.006,635.563.39100%003Additional Project Coordination26,950.3826,950.3826,942.740.0026,942.747.64100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8890.00 45,984.490.0045,984.49 45,973.19 0.00 45,973.19 11.30 100%890SUPPLEMENTAL #27 - SENATE BILL 1 LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM APPLICATION 001Performance Measure Analysis6,186.81 6,186.81 6,186.64 0.00 6,186.64 0.17 100%002Cost/Benefit Calculation4,753.68 4,753.68 4,733.44 0.00 4,733.44 20.24 100%003Prepare Graphics & Exhibits10,676.07 10,676.07 10,647.95 0.00 10,647.95 28.12 100%004Document Preparation7,392.90 7,392.90 7,392.21 0.00 7,392.21 0.69 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8900.00 29,009.460.0029,009.46 28,960.24 0.00 28,960.24 49.22 100%891SUPPLEMENTAL #27- SUBCONSULTANTS100ICF: ENVIRONMENTAL OVERSIGHT/MANAGEMENT9,351.72 9,351.72 9,216.78 0.00 9,216.78 134.94 99%101ICF: MONITORING OF NEW NEST BOXES FOR PURPLE MARTIN5,626.45 5,626.45 5,417.49 0.00 5,417.49 208.96 96%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8910.00 14,978.170.0014,978.17 14,634.27 0.00 14,634.27 343.90 98%892SUPPLEMENT #28 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT001Project Management127,664.34 127,664.34 127,659.86 0.00 127,659.86 4.48 100%002PDT Meetings102,454.80 102,454.80 102,453.36 0.00 102,453.36 1.44 100%003Agency/Subconsultant Coordination47,434.17 47,434.17 47,423.43 0.00 47,423.43 10.74 100%004Presentations to City Councils & Commissions72,686.52 72,686.52 15,954.40 0.00 15,954.40 56,732.12 22%005Additional Funding Assistance45,818.57 45,818.57 45,761.74 0.00 45,761.74 56.83 100%006QA/QC84,796.62 84,796.62 84,795.19 0.00 84,795.19 1.43 100%007UPRR/CPUC Coordination50,347.20 50,347.20 113.91 0.00 113.91 50,233.29 0%099MT REIMBURSABLES383,616.42 383,616.42 338,787.17 11,245.00 350,032.17 33,584.25 91%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8920.00 914,818.640.00914,818.64 762,949.06 11,245.00 774,194.06 140,624.58 85%893SUPPLEMENT #28 - SURVEY & MAPPING001Control & Aerial Mapping29,525.26 29,525.26 29,525.26 0.00 29,525.26 0.00 100%002Supplemental Topographic Survey28,650.97 28,650.97 28,650.97 0.00 28,650.97 0.00 100%003Retracement Surveys6,352.68 6,352.68 6,351.28 0.00 6,351.28 1.40 100%004Monument Preservation26,339.29 26,339.29 26,324.88 0.00 26,324.88 14.41 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8930.00 90,868.200.0090,868.20 90,852.39 0.00 90,852.39 15.81 100%894SUPPLEMENT #28 - RIGHT OF WAY & UTILITY COORDINATION001Appraisal Mapping4,448.20 4,448.20 4,445.12 0.00 4,445.12 3.08 100%002Appraisal & Exhibits29,530.95 29,530.95 29,502.09 0.00 29,502.09 28.86 100%003Acquisitions (W Sac)66,949.39 66,949.39 66,939.13 0.00 66,939.13 10.26 100%004Appraisal & Acquisition Support35,510.47 35,510.47 35,218.29 0.00 35,218.29 292.18 99%005Utility Coordination92,692.1792,692.1792,667.540.0092,667.5424.63100%006Right of Way Certification3,813.883,813.881,594.740.001,594.742,219.1442%007Potholing40,198.5940,198.5926,406.820.0026,406.8213,791.7766%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8940.00 273,143.650.00273,143.65 256,773.73 0.00 256,773.73 16,369.92 94%895SUPPLEMENT #28 - STUDIES & REPORTS001Geotechnical Reports17,605.4517,605.4517,570.380.0017,570.3835.07100%002Hydraulic & Scour Analysis Report23,736.3223,736.3223,732.030.0023,732.034.29100%003Drainage Report104,931.88104,931.88104,212.080.00104,212.08719.8099%004Storm Water Data Report55,037.7955,037.798,417.130.008,417.1346,620.6615%005Traffic Analysis (Detour During Construction)20,373.44 20,373.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,373.44 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8950.00 221,684.880.00221,684.88 153,931.62 0.00 153,931.62 67,753.26 69%896SUPPLEMENT #28 - PUBLIC OUTREACH001Open House #128,168.3328,168.333,265.760.003,265.7624,902.5712%002Open House #217,555.3517,555.350.000.000.0017,555.350%003One on One Stakeholder Coordination217.64217.64217.640.00217.640.00100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8960.00 45,941.320.0045,941.32 3,483.40 0.00 3,483.40 42,457.92 8%897SUPPLEMENT #28 - PERMITS001Regulatory Permits58,288.3958,288.3958,270.100.0058,270.1018.29100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8970.00 58,288.390.0058,288.39 58,270.10 0.00 58,270.10 18.29 100%898SUPPLEMENT #28 - 65% PLANS (UNCHECKED) & ESTIMATES001Roadway1,083,274.511,083,274.511,083,265.620.001,083,265.628.89100%002Levees7,679.297,679.297,663.590.007,663.5915.70100%003Structure Plans172,877.18172,877.18172,875.270.00172,875.271.91100%004Bridge Architecture39,591.9639,591.9639,584.200.0039,584.207.76100%005Landscape Architecture114,798.79114,798.79114,791.950.00114,791.956.84100%006Signal & Lighting10,384.0710,384.0710,374.510.0010,374.519.56100%007Specifications & Estimates116,025.72116,025.72116,013.300.00116,013.3012.42100%008Constructability & Interdisciplinary Review15,238.42 15,238.42 14,999.38 0.00 14,999.38 239.04 98%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8980.00 1,559,869.950.001,559,869.95 1,559,567.82 0.00 1,559,567.82 302.13 100%899SUPPLEMENT #28 - SUBCONSULTANTS100AIM: OUTREACH MANAGEMENT11,443.78 11,443.78 4,346.83 0.00 4,346.83 7,096.95 38%101AIM: STAKEHOLDER DATABASE2,812.332,812.332,017.300.002,017.30795.0372%102AIM: KEY STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS (10)1,560.64 1,560.64 1,560.64 0.00 1,560.64 0.00 100%103AIM: PUBLIC WORKSHOPS (2)14,664.2314,664.2314,664.230.0014,664.230.00100% 104AIM: PROJECT UPDATE NEWSLETTERS (8)5,206.56 5,206.56 1,588.64 0.00 1,588.64 3,617.92 31%105AIM: COMMUNICATION COLLATERAL2,560.88 2,560.88 2,560.88 0.00 2,560.88 0.00 100%106AIM: PROJECT WEBPAGE4,244.44 4,244.44 617.14 0.00 617.14 3,627.30 15%199AIM: REIMBURSABLES3,450.00 3,450.00 1,656.54 0.00 1,656.54 1,793.46 48%200AVILA: GATHER INFORMATION3,545.50 3,545.50 796.16 0.00 796.16 2,749.34 22%201AVILA: HYDROLOGY1,548.65 1,548.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,548.65 0%202AVILA: HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS3,297.81 3,297.81 100.26 0.00 100.26 3,197.55 3%203AVILA: BRIDGE SCOUR ESTIMATES6,380.96 6,380.96 6,351.46 0.00 6,351.46 29.50 100%204AVILA: BANK PROTECTION4,566.93 4,566.93 3,408.81 0.00 3,408.81 1,158.12 75%205AVILA: SCOUR REPORT6,086.09 6,086.09 4,859.40 0.00 4,859.40 1,226.69 80%206AVILA: PROJECT MANAGEMENT1,698.44 1,698.44 328.65 0.00 328.65 1,369.79 19%299AVILA: REIMBURSABLES87.20 87.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.20 0%300F&P: PROJECT MANAGEMENT7,617.65 7,617.65 7,570.23 47.42 7,617.65 0.00 100%301F&P: TRAFFIC ANALYSIS (DETOUR DURING CONSTRUCTION)20,770.11 20,770.11 19,814.12 955.99 20,770.11 0.00 100%302F&P: SIGNAL & LIGHTING (65%)59,711.19 59,711.19 59,711.19 0.00 59,711.19 0.00 100%303F&P: ESTIMATES (65%)3,302.67 3,302.67 3,302.67 0.00 3,302.67 0.00 100%304F&P: CONSTRUCTABILITY & INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW (65%)2,948.17 2,948.17 2,948.17 0.00 2,948.17 0.00 100%399F&P: REIMBURSABLES642.00 642.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 642.00 0%400GEI: GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSES & CALTRANS BRIDGE FOUNDATION REPORT PREPARATION152,745.69 152,745.69 152,737.21 0.00 152,737.21 8.48 100%401GEI: LEVEE MODIFICATION ANALYSES & REPORT141,244.58 141,244.58 140,876.43 0.00 140,876.43 368.15 100%402GEI: ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS98,961.67 98,961.67 98,711.04 0.00 98,711.04 250.63 100%403GEI: LEVEE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS149,391.16 149,391.16 149,371.77 0.00 149,371.77 19.39 100%404GEI: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & QUALITY CONTROL28,308.21 28,308.21 28,085.02 0.00 28,085.02 223.19 99%499GEI: REIMBURSABLES26,926.51 26,926.51 23,932.50 0.00 23,932.50 2,994.01 89%500ICF: ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPORT DURING PS&E97,260.15 97,260.15 78,754.13 1,888.77 80,642.90 16,617.25 83%501ICF: EXTENDED PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SUBSURFACE EXCAVATIONS49,618.89 49,618.89 38,892.98 139.02 39,032.00 10,586.89 79%502ICF: BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS306,769.69 306,769.69 264,903.56 8,982.07 273,885.63 32,884.06 89%599ICF: REIMBURSABLES32,560.00 32,560.00 6,577.33 0.00 6,577.33 25,982.67 20%600M&M: MEETINGS153,694.56 153,694.56 153,694.56 0.00 153,694.56 0.00 100%601M&M: ARCHITECH COORDINATION41,026.28 41,026.28 41,026.28 0.00 41,026.28 0.00 100%602M&M: STRUCTURAL1,467,339.471,467,339.471,467,339.470.001,467,339.470.00100%603M&M: MECHANICAL746,754.75746,754.75746,754.750.00746,754.750.00100%604M&M: ELECTRICAL768,798.97768,798.97768,798.970.00768,798.970.00100%605M&M: SPECS63,806.4963,806.4963,806.490.0063,806.490.00100%606M&M: COST ESTIMATE45,546.1045,546.1045,546.100.0045,546.100.00100%699M&M: REIMBURSABLES133,996.95133,996.95133,996.950.00133,996.950.00100%700MBK: PROJECT MANAGEMENT10,754.5210,754.5210,706.990.0010,706.9947.53100%701MBK: BRIDGE DESIGN H&H30,890.0430,890.0430,454.160.0030,454.16435.8899%702MBK: HYDRAULIC IMPACT ANALYSIS65,609.11 65,609.11 37,659.44 18,080.19 55,739.63 9,869.48 85%703MBK: DOCUMENTATION25,182.1925,182.1925,177.380.0025,177.384.81100%750MON: ROW MANAGEMENT32,340.0032,340.0032,340.000.0032,340.000.00100%751MON: ACQUISITION/ESCROW SUPPORT50,220.96 50,220.96 45,516.79 599.67 46,116.46 4,104.50 92%752MON: RELOCATION36,784.4436,784.4436,527.870.0036,527.87256.5799%753MON: ROW CERTIFICATION3,696.003,696.000.000.000.003,696.000%799MON: REIMBURSABLES169,327.56169,327.56158,204.000.00158,204.0011,123.5693%800TYLIN: PROJECT MANAGEMENT19,632.3119,632.3119,532.820.0019,532.8299.4999%801TYLIN: PDT MEETINGS4,550.904,550.90618.040.00618.043,932.8614%802TYLIN: STRUCTURE PLANS179,004.83179,004.83167,952.560.00167,952.5611,052.2794%803TYLIN: BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE221,738.02221,738.02221,460.400.00221,460.40277.62100%899TYLIN: REIMBURSABLES163.50163.50163.500.00163.500.00100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 8990.00 5,522,790.730.005,522,790.73 5,328,322.81 30,693.13 5,359,015.94 163,774.79 97%900SUPPLEMENT #30 - SUBCONSULTANTS100F&P: OPERATIONS ANALYSIS4,565.374,565.374,565.370.004,565.370.00100%101F&P: CONCEPTUAL SIGNAL DESIGN14,868.2814,868.2814,868.280.0014,868.280.00100%102F&P: CONCEPTUAL ITS DESIGN9,368.079,368.079,368.070.009,368.070.00100%103F&P: MEETINGS/COORDINATION4,024.384,024.384,024.380.004,024.380.00100%104F&P: DOCUMENTATION5,138.135,138.135,138.130.005,138.130.00100%105F&P: LPP GRANT APPLICATION ASSISTANCE3,947.02 3,947.02 3,947.02 0.00 3,947.02 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9000.00 41,911.250.0041,911.25 41,911.25 0.00 41,911.25 0.00 100%901SUPPLEMENT #34100BCI: COORDINATION, REVIEW OF BACKGROUND INFORMATION1,090.56 1,090.56 1,090.56 0.00 1,090.56 0.00 100%101BCI: FIELD RECONNAISSANCE3,094.403,094.403,094.400.003,094.400.00100%102BCI: HISTORICAL RESEARCH & RECORDS REVIEW4,394.23 4,394.23 4,394.23 0.00 4,394.23 0.00 100%103BCI: REPORT PREPARATION31,639.4531,639.4528,294.830.0028,294.833,344.6289%199BCI: REIMBURSABLES870.00870.00700.000.00700.00170.0080%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9010.00 41,088.640.0041,088.64 37,574.02 0.00 37,574.02 3,514.62 91%902SUPPLEMENT #35 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT001Project Management128,182.83128,182.8345,199.7725,216.1670,415.9357,766.9055%099MT REIMBURSABLES324,670.00324,670.00219,526.507,517.50227,044.0097,626.0070% SUBTOTAL PHASE 9020.00 452,852.830.00452,852.83 264,726.27 32,733.66 297,459.93 155,392.90 66%903SUPPLEMENT #35 - 95% PS&E001Roadway932,598.26 932,598.26 932,597.34 0.00 932,597.34 0.92 100%002Levees8,254.13 8,254.13 8,248.83 0.00 8,248.83 5.30 100%003Structure Plans198,709.73 198,709.73 198,701.89 0.00 198,701.89 7.84 100%004Bridge Architecture40,230.29 40,230.29 40,202.78 0.00 40,202.78 27.51 100%005Landscape Architecture111,977.34 111,977.34 111,971.99 0.00 111,971.99 5.35 100%006Signal & Lighting11,041.87 11,041.87 11,017.52 0.00 11,017.52 24.35 100%007Specifications66,331.14 66,331.14 66,301.30 0.00 66,301.30 29.84 100%008Estimates119,819.67 119,819.67 119,798.52 0.00 119,798.52 21.15 100%009Constructability & Interdisciplinary Review13,093.49 13,093.49 13,069.92 0.00 13,069.92 23.57 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9030.00 1,502,055.910.001,502,055.91 1,501,910.09 0.00 1,501,910.09 145.82 100%904SUPPLEMENT #35 - 100% PS&E001Roadway500,422.91 500,422.91 399,121.01 101,297.51 500,418.52 4.39 100%002Levees5,688.67 5,688.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,688.67 0%003Structure Plans67,248.85 67,248.85 67,248.51 0.00 67,248.51 0.34 100%004Bridge Architecture28,177.15 28,177.15 28,146.45 0.00 28,146.45 30.70 100%005Landscape Architecture91,092.27 91,092.27 91,086.69 0.00 91,086.69 5.58 100%006Signal & Lighting7,985.14 7,985.14 0.00 7,562.39 7,562.39 422.75 95%007Specifications43,307.05 43,307.05 43,280.46 0.00 43,280.46 26.59 100%008Estimates78,229.67 78,229.67 31,348.44 46,271.03 77,619.47 610.20 99%009Constructability & Interdisciplinary Review49,429.19 49,429.19 37,689.66 10,135.59 47,825.25 1,603.94 97%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9040.00 871,580.900.00871,580.90 697,921.22 165,266.52 863,187.74 8,393.16 99%905SUPPLEMENT #35 - PRE CONSTRUCTION001Resident Engineer File48,629.52 48,629.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,629.52 0%002Bidding Assistance37,833.19 37,833.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,833.19 0%003Award Review17,424.41 17,424.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,424.41 0%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9050.00 103,887.110.00103,887.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 103,887.11 0%906SUPPLEMENT 35 - SUBCONSULTANTS100F&P: ADDITIONAL WORK FOR TSDCR8,457.33 8,457.33 8,457.33 0.00 8,457.33 0.00 100%101F&P: 95% SIGNAL & LIGHTING76,319.73 76,319.73 76,319.73 0.00 76,319.73 0.00 100%102F&P: 95% SPECIFICATIONS7,479.947,479.947,479.940.007,479.940.00100%103F&P: 95% ESTIMATES3,984.543,984.543,984.540.003,984.540.00100%104F&P: 95% CONSTRUCTABILITY & INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW3,736.43 3,736.43 3,736.43 0.00 3,736.43 0.00 100%105F&P: 100% SIGNAL & LIGHTING34,523.7534,523.7534,523.750.0034,523.750.00100%106F&P: 100% SPECIFICATIONS5,216.905,216.905,216.900.005,216.900.00100%107F&P: 100% ESTIMATES2,799.092,799.092,799.090.002,799.090.00100%108F&P: 100% CONSTRUCTABILITY & INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW3,736.43 3,736.43 3,736.43 0.00 3,736.43 0.00 100%109F&P: BIDDING ASSISTANCE3,296.633,296.630.002,606.172,606.17690.4679%200GEI: SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, LAB TESTING, GDR & LOTB18,787.88 18,787.88 18,730.67 0.00 18,730.67 57.21 100%201GEI: REPORTING: FOUNDATION ANALYSES & FINAL CT BRIDGE FOUNDATION REPORT PREPARATION138,860.36 138,860.36 138,824.00 0.00 138,824.00 36.36 100%202GEI: 90%, DRAFT, 100% & FINAL LEVEE MODIFICATION DESIGN SHEETS & SPECS193,673.56 193,673.56 193,673.26 0.00 193,673.26 0.30 100%203GEI: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & QC26,785.3126,785.3126,779.520.0026,779.525.79100%300M&M: PROJECT MANAGEMENT84,035.8484,035.8484,035.840.0084,035.840.00100%301M&M: 95% STRUCTURE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES1,281,781.16 1,281,781.16 1,281,781.16 0.00 1,281,781.16 0.00 100%302M&M: 100% STRUCTURE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES1,280,472.46 1,280,472.46 1,280,472.46 0.00 1,280,472.46 0.00 100%400TYLIN: 95% BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE136,945.40 136,945.40 136,285.13 0.00 136,285.13 660.27 100%401TYLIN: 95% STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING131,882.69 131,882.69 119,175.17 0.00 119,175.17 12,707.52 90%402TYLIN: 100% BRIDGE ARCHITECTURE41,840.00 41,840.00 23,775.28 0.00 23,775.28 18,064.72 57%403TYLIN: 100% STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING32,914.11 32,914.11 18,920.99 0.00 18,920.99 13,993.12 57%499TYLIN: REIMBURSABLES0.000.000.000.000.000.000%599BCI: REIMBURSABLES0.000.000.000.000.000.000%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9060.00 3,517,529.540.003,517,529.54 3,468,707.62 2,606.17 3,471,313.79 46,215.75 99%907SUPPLEMENT 36099MT Reimbursables16,000.0016,000.000.000.000.0016,000.000%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9070.00 16,000.000.0016,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 0%908SUPPLEMENT 36 (SUBCONSULTANTS)100BCI: COORDINATION MEETINGS WITH REGULATORY AGENCY5,186.37 5,186.37 4,331.13 0.00 4,331.13 855.24 84%101BCI: DOCUMENT REVIEW, PERMITS, USA NOTIFICATION4,247.28 4,247.28 4,192.19 0.00 4,192.19 55.09 99%102BCI: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION8,958.99 8,958.99 7,931.72 0.00 7,931.72 1,027.27 89%103BCI: LABORATORY TESTING & ANALYSIS1,425.20 1,425.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,425.20 0%104BCI: REPORT PREPARATION26,533.1926,533.1922,503.940.0022,503.944,029.2585%199BCI: REIMBURSABLES19,655.2019,655.2019,387.680.0019,387.68267.5299% SUBTOTAL PHASE 9080.00 66,006.230.0066,006.23 58,346.66 0.00 58,346.66 7,659.57 88%909SUPPLEMENT 37 099MT Reimbursables (Sloan)10,520.00 10,520.00 10,520.00 0.00 10,520.00 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9090.00 10,520.000.0010,520.00 10,520.00 0.00 10,520.00 0.00 100%910SUPPLEMENT 37 (SUBCONSULTANTS)100M&M: 100% PS&E181,948.08 181,948.08 181,948.08 0.00 181,948.08 0.00 100%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9100.00 181,948.080.00181,948.08 181,948.08 0.00 181,948.08 0.00 100%911SUPPLEMENT 38 099MT Reimbursables (D&B)81,294.00 81,294.00 62,314.50 0.00 62,314.50 18,979.50 77%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9110.00 81,294.000.0081,294.00 62,314.50 0.00 62,314.50 18,979.50 77%912SUPPLEMENT 41 100M&M: BID SUPPORT100,042.29 100,042.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,042.290%SUBTOTAL PHASE 9120.00 100,042.290.00100,042.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,042.29 0%913SUPPLEMENT 42 - CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES001Bidding292,556.64292,556.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 292,556.64 0%002Construction Support1,208,118.191,208,118.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,208,118.19100M&M: Construction Support1,000,077.511,000,077.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,077.51 0%199M&M: Reimbursables17,704.8017,704.80 17,704.80SUBTOTAL PHASE 9120.00 0.002,518,457.142,518,457.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,518,457.14 0% GRAND TOTAL SERVICES2,088,805.00 21,124,658.21 2,518,457.14 23,643,115.35 19,947,474.68 246,795.59 20,194,270.27 3,448,845.08 96%

Check one: SubSA 40PrimeSUB CONSULTANT Name:MBK EngineersDate:11/4/2025XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %60.60% 128.93% 0.00% 189.53%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Approved Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee)XPrincipal Engineer Don Trieu $94.33 $300.43Project Manager Pro Mitra $73.14 $232.94Supervising Engineer Mike Archer $81.27 $258.83Assistant Engineer MacKenzie Gulliams $39.43 $125.58Principal Engineer Thomas Engler $86.48 $275.42Water Resources Associate Matt Bachman $48.45 $154.31Technical Editor Oneia Hawkins $33.15 $105.58Principal Engineer Ben Tustison $94.33 $300.43Supervising Engineer Mike Kynett $76.34 $243.13Supervising Engineer Tony Deus $70.85 $225.65Engineering Aid Nichole Leonard $31.46 $100.19Supervising Engineer Patrick Ho $69.92 $222.68$0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Description RateTotalTetra Tech At Cost 42,585.00$ OTHER DIRECT COSTS TOTAL 42,585.00$ SUB-CONSULTANT GRAND TOTAL: 256,385.75$ [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMCOST PLUS FIXED FEEApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):I-Street Bridge Replacement ProjectT15136000 Other Direct Costs (ODC) Estimated ODC Budgets Shall Be A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

Page 1 of 2 ends

Check one: SubSA #40PrimeSUB CONSULTANT Name:T.Y. Lin InternationalDate:10/14/2025XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %0.00% 150.75% 150.75%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Approved Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee)Principal-in-Charge Michael F. Pyrz, PE $158.77 $437.93XProject Manager / Lead Bridge Architect Noel Shamble, AIA, NCARB, EIT $91.68 $252.88Designer I Michael Soderberg $39.90 $110.05XDesign Manager Hunter Ruthrauff $77.09 $212.63Designer II Jeff Schiewe $86.50 $238.59Designer I David Hui $41.88 $115.52Designer I Josh Vandenberg $54.51 $150.35Computational Designer Greg Blanpied $49.52 $136.59Code Compliance Jim Burton $77.76 $214.48Accountant Toni Waller $41.39 $114.16Senior Project Manager Jim Krapf $81.58 $225.02Senior Structural Engineer Michael Martello $87.54 $241.46Lead Structural Engineer Matthew Wagner $64.49 $177.88Senior Structural Engineer Nathan Hicks $89.69 $247.39XSector Manager / Structural Engineer Nicholas Presciutti $76.88 $212.05Project Engineer Thomas Moorhoof $71.72 $197.82Senior Plans Examiner Andrew Collini $44.42 $122.52Technician Steven Marsceill $47.91 $132.15Technician Pat White $33.64 $92.79Architect II TBD $75.00 $206.87Senior Architect, Lightweight Structures Mattew Hillyard $47.73 $131.65Founding Director, Lightweight Structures Nic Goldsmith $107.28 $295.91Structural Engineer / Sr. Principal Kirk Mettam $181.96 $501.89Sr. Director, Lightweight Structures Ashish Soni $90.67 $250.09Senior Engineer II, Lightweight Structures Erik Smith $72.93 $201.16Description RateTotalAirfare & Hotel At Cost 1,413.56$ Train & Taxi/Uber At Cost 932.32$ Mileage IRS Rate 872.00$ Meals & Incidentals (M&EI) At Cost 584.92$ Physical Model Supplies At Cost 1,674.91$ Presentation Boards Print At Cost 5,276.53$ OTHER DIRECT COSTS TOTAL 10,754.24$ SUB-CONSULTANT GRAND TOTAL: 1,087,935.90$ [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMCOST PLUS FIXED FEEApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):I Street Bridge Replacement ProjectT15136000 Other Direct Costs (ODC) Items and RatesEstimated ODC Budgets Shall Be Included in Cost Proposal.

A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate

Page 1 of 2 ends

Avila & AssociatesDate:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %85.09%29.36%114.45%Profit %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing RateXProject Manager Cathy Avila $92.88 $219.10 $219.10Senior Engineer Todd Remington $67.34 $158.85 $158.85Technical Editor TBD $77.40 $182.58#$182.58Assistant Engineer Katherine Gwynn $43.86 $103.46 $103.46GIS Technician Kerry Wilcox $46.44 $109.55 $109.55Associate Engineer TBD $53.66 $126.58 $126.58Senior Engineer TBD $67.34 $158.85 $158.85Assistant Engineer TBD $43.86 $103.46 $103.46Assistant Engineer Dean Xerogeanes $40.14 $94.69 $94.69GIS Technician TBD $46.44 $109.55 $109.55Description Rate TotalMileage At Current IRS Rate $87.20 By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.Catherine M.C. Avila1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original. 4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. 7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients. CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR Project Manager's Signature A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Supplement #395/7/2025Approved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMI Street BridgeT15136000CONTRACTOR Name:

Page1 of 1Version: March 27, 2015

Check one: SubPrimeCONSULTANT Name:Blackburn ConsultingDate:XSubProject Name:2nd Tier SubProject #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %Combined %27.47%216.20%0.00%243.67%Fixed Fee (Profit) %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe, OH, or G&A)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH, G&A & Fixed Fee)Sr. Principal Robert Lokteff $103.01 $389.43Principal Haze Rodgers $95.96 $362.77Sr. Project Manager David Morrell $68.17#$257.72Sr. Project Manager Nicole Hart $65.47 $247.49Project Manager Laura Long $54.31 $205.33Project Manager Robert Sandquist $52.45 $198.28Project Manager Robert Pickard $49.67 $187.78Senior Engineer Brian Carey $54.11 $204.55Senior Engineer Daniel Contreras $51.17 $193.43Project Engineer Luke Morrell $42.50 $160.65Project Engineer Nicholas Vasquez $34.68 $131.09Project Engineer Barry Smith $30.89 $116.79Project Engineer Alex Garcia $29.42 $111.21Project Engineer David Magana $27.32 $103.27Drafter/CAD Ryan Hiett $35.72 $135.04Drafter/CAD Thomas Jepsen $25.63 $96.87Assistant Natalie Mutto $22.59 $85.40Contract Administrator Kelly Rasch $42.03 $158.87XPW Materials Test / Inspector Group 3 Luke Morrell $73.04 $276.12XPW OT Materials Test / Inspector Group 3 Luke Morrell $98.18 $371.17XPW Materials Test / Inspector Group 3 Alex Garcia $76.73 $290.07XPW OT Materials Test / Inspector Group 3 Alex Garcia $101.87 $385.12Description RateTotalRecords Search At Cost1,395.00$ Laboratory Testing At Cost2,319.00$ GPR Survey At Cost 2,800.00$ Permitting At Cost 935.00$ Mileage @ IRS RATE 119.38$ Outside Laboratory Testing At Cost 10,905.00$ Specialty Vendor (PeneCore Drilling) At Cost 4,045.50$ Hand Sampling Equipment At Cost 696.00$ PID At Cost 200.00$ TOTAL 23,414.88$ GRAND TOTAL:
[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMCOST PLUS FIXED FEEApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):#394/21/2025I Street BridgeT15136000+ Gen & Admin % A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURERobert B. LokteffOther Direct Costs (ODC) Items and RatesEstimated ODC Budgets Shall Be Included in Cost Proposal.1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original. 4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. 7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.

Version: JANUARY 4, 2022Page1 of 1
Fehr & PeersDate:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %73.06% 102.98% 176.04%Profit %:9.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing RateXPrincipal Ron Milam $128.13 $385.52 $385.52Principal Bob Grandy $130.59 $392.92 $392.92Principal David Robinson $116.79 $351.40#$351.40Principal John Gard $121.23 $364.76 $364.76Senior Associate David Stanek $79.83 $240.20 $240.20Principal Kwasi Donkor $73.92 $222.41 $222.41Principal Charlie Alexander $81.31 $244.65 $244.65XPrincipal Kristin Calia $79.58 $239.44 $239.44Senior Associate Rob Hananouchi $70.67 $212.63 $212.63Senior Technician James Moser $49.28 $148.28 $148.28Senior Technician Beverly Willett $39.18 $117.89 $117.89Senior Technician William Edmonson $44.35 $133.44 $133.44Principal Brandy Foust $85.10 $256.05 $256.05Administrative Lacy Delgado $33.02 $99.35 $99.35Administrative JoLynn Souto $47.55 $143.07 $143.07Administrative Lindsey Zamboanga $52.23 $157.15 $157.15Administrative Shannon Baker $45.83 $137.89 $137.89Senior Engineer/Planner David Manciati $53.22 $160.13 $160.13Engineer/Planner Meredith Milam $34.98 $105.25 $105.25Senior Engineer/Planner Elizabeth Suarez $41.59 $125.14 $125.14Senior Engineer/Planner Sonia Anthoine $49.76 $149.72 $149.72Senior Associate Danny Murphy $73.08 $219.89 $219.89Senior Engineer/Planner Jessica Sandoval $53.71 $161.60 $161.60Senior Engineer/Planner Marissa Milam $46.81 $140.84 $140.84Senior Engineer/Planner Adrita Islam $51.74 $155.68 $155.68Engineer/Planner Evan Mori $32.03 $96.37 $96.37$0.00 $0.00Engineer/Planner Brian Situ $38.93 $117.13 $117.13Engineer/Planner Jose Garcia $38.93 $117.13 $117.13Engineer/Planner Mari Ramones $38.93 $117.13 $117.13Engineer/Planner Jacob Igawa $38.46 $115.72 $115.72Engineer/Planner Daoud Farah $33.65 $101.25 $101.25Principal Adrian Engel $87.98 $264.72 $264.72Administrative Laura Murphy $37.02 $111.39 $111.39Administrative Tanya Silchuk $34.62 $104.17 $104.17Administrative Gizelle Halvorson $29.81 $89.69 $89.69$0.00 $0.00$0.00 $0.00Description Rate TotalTraffic Counts At Cost $5,480.00Mileage Current IRS Rate $692.29 A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly RateCITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):Supplement #39CONTRACTOR Name:4/21/2025I Street Bridge ReplacementT15136000[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A Other Direct Costs (ODC) Items and RatesEstimated ODC Budgets Shall Be Included in Cost Proposal.Page1 of 2Version: March 27, 2015 Fehr & PeersDate:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %73.06% 102.98% 176.04%Profit %:9.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing Rate A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly RateApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):Supplement #39CONTRACTOR Name:4/21/2025I Street Bridge ReplacementT15136000[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR Project Manager's SignatureKristin Calia, Principal

1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original. 4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. 7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.

Page2 of 2Version: March 27, 2015

ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.Date:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %32.55% 141.94% 174.49%Profit %:10.00%Key StaffPrevailing Wage Classification NameActual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee For Reference Only (Does not Include any Fringe or OH)Actual Fully Loaded Hourly Rate For Reference Only (Includes Fringe, OH & Profit)Approved Flat Hourly Billing RateXProject Director Claire Bromund$86.59 $261.45 $261.45Project Director David Buehler$107.63 $324.98 $324.98Project Director Christine Cruiess$74.13 $223.83 $223.83Project Director Gregg Ellis$99.18 $299.46 $299.46Project Director Jeff Kozlowski$76.22 $230.14 $230.14Project Director Susan Lassell$91.12 $275.13 $275.13XProject Director Maggie Townsley$104.84 $316.55 $316.55Technical Director Antero Rivasplata$63.57 $191.94 $191.94Technical Consultant James Alcorn$48.09 $145.20 $145.20Technical Consultant Sara Baker$52.73 $159.21 $159.21Technical Consultant Peter Banke$50.99 $153.96 $153.96Technical Consultant Caitlyn Bishop$40.12 $121.14 $121.14Technical Consultant Sheryl Brown$61.83 $186.69 $186.69Technical Consultant Katherine Carpenter$57.66 $174.10 $174.10Technical Consultant Hannah Carrell$51.74 $156.22 $156.22Technical Consultant Nicole Felicetti$37.13 $112.11 $112.11Technical Consultant Garry Finley Moore$26.65 $80.47 $80.47Technical Consultant Elizabeth Foley$63.65 $192.18 $192.18Technical Consultant Marin Greenwood$83.53 $252.21 $252.21Technical Consultant Jonathan Higginson$83.18 $251.15 $251.15Technical Consultant Erin Hitchcock$80.06 $241.73 $241.73Technical Consultant Alessia Isolani$28.70 $86.66 $86.66Technical Consultant Shannon Joy$36.47 $110.12 $110.12Technical Consultant Donna Maniscalco$49.29 $148.83 $148.83Technical Consultant Jordan Mayor$47.85 $144.48 $144.48Technical Consultant Corey Ng$38.57 $116.46 $116.46Technical Consultant Jason Peters$46.81 $141.34 $141.34Technical Consultant Daniel Schiff$42.25 $127.57 $127.57Technical Consultant Eric Stitt$58.37 $176.24 $176.24Technical Consultant Justin Tortosa$49.73 $150.15 $150.15Technical Consultant Danika Tsao$68.68 $207.37 $207.37Technical Consultant Mehrey Vaghti$51.25 $154.74 $154.74Technical Consultant Manna Warburton$52.77 $159.33 $159.33Technical Consultant Jack Webb$35.88 $108.34 $108.34Technical Consultant Ross Wilming$50.49 $152.45 $152.45Technical Consultant Ramona Zeno$42.54 $128.44 $128.44Sr Technical Analyst Rachel Gardiner$68.99 $208.31 $208.31Sr Technical Analyst John Karr$36.68 $110.75 $110.75Sr Technical Analyst Kaitlin Kozlowski$37.28 $112.56 $112.56Sr Technical Analyst Scott Miller$52.97 $159.94 $159.94Sr Technical Analyst Breidy Quispe Vilcahuaman$36.26 $109.48 $109.48Sr Technical Analyst Aliana Summers$43.28 $130.68 $130.68 [Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly RateReplacement of I Street BridgeT15136000CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):CONTRACTOR Name:4/25/2025 ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.Date:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %32.55% 141.94% 174.49%Profit %:10.00%[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly RateReplacement of I Street BridgeT15136000CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):CONTRACTOR Name:4/25/2025Sr Consultant III Harry Oakes$79.84 $241.07 $241.07Sr Consultant III Shilpa Trisal$82.78 $249.95 $249.95Sr Consultant III Michael Vondergeest$66.35 $200.34 $200.34Sr Consultant II Namrata Cariapa$58.49 $176.60 $176.60Sr Consultant II Jennifer Hale$66.11 $199.61 $199.61Sr Consultant II Anne Huber$63.22 $190.89 $190.89Sr Consultant II Stephen Pappas$60.00 $181.16 $181.16Sr Consultant II Jeff Peters$65.42 $197.53 $197.53Sr Consultant II Amy Poopatanapong$55.70 $168.18 $168.18Sr Consultant II Rob Preston$66.63 $201.18 $201.18Sr Consultant II Ellen Unsworth$55.12 $166.43 $166.43Sr Consultant II Jason Volk$68.54 $206.95 $206.95Sr Consultant I Kasey Allen$58.94 $177.96 $177.96Sr Consultant I Christiaan Havelaar$64.65 $195.20 $195.20Sr Consultant I Eric Link$59.42 $179.41 $179.41Sr Consultant I Jennifer Stock$61.75 $186.45 $186.45Sr Consultant I Lisa Webber$61.13 $184.58 $184.58Finance Specialist Maria Wlasiuk$49.85 $150.52 $150.52Editorial Specialist Teresa Giffen$53.10 $160.33 $160.33Editorial Specialist Heather Hammermeister$48.23 $145.63 $145.63Editorial Specialist Dennis Johnson$36.49 $110.18 $110.18Editorial Specialist Christine McCrory$46.57 $140.61 $140.61Editorial Specialist Tami Mihm$57.82 $174.58 $174.58Editorial Specialist Stephanie Monzon$45.84 $138.41 $138.41Editorial Specialist Stephen Unyi$32.05 $96.77 $96.77Editorial Specialist Barbara Wolf$41.44 $125.12 $125.12Intern Robert Rivasplata$28.91 $87.29 $87.29Associate Consultant III Alex Angier$46.22 $139.56 $139.56Associate Consultant III Melissa Cascella$61.67 $186.21 $186.21Associate Consultant III Leila Harris$67.04 $202.42 $202.42Associate Consultant III Cory Matsui$62.08 $187.44 $187.44Associate Consultant III Michelle Osborn$73.92 $223.19 $223.19Associate Consultant III Jenifer Rogers$40.65 $122.74 $122.74Associate Consultant III Tina Sorvari$66.01 $199.31 $199.31Associate Consultant III Laura Yoon$79.13 $238.92 $238.92Associate Consultant II Lisa Allen$40.74 $123.01 $123.01Associate Consultant II Daniel 'Roscoe' Escobar$43.56 $131.52 $131.52Associate Consultant II Andrea Gueyger$30.75 $92.85 $92.85Associate Consultant II Anthony Ha$45.27 $136.69 $136.69Associate Consultant II Arin Phillips$44.24 $133.58 $133.58Associate Consultant II Nicole Stotz$42.33 $127.81 $127.81 ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc.Date:XProject Name:Project #:Fringe Benefit % + *Overhead %=Combined %32.55% 141.94% 174.49%Profit %:10.00%[Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee + (Actual Base Hourly Rate Paid to Employee x Combined %)] = A A x Profit % = B A + B = Actual Fully Loaded Hourly RateReplacement of I Street BridgeT15136000CITY OF SACRAMENTO 10-H FORMApproved with Supplement # (type Original if it is the Original):CONTRACTOR Name:4/25/2025Assistant Consultant Jesse Cherry$35.58 $107.43 $107.43Assistant Consultant Bryce Kantz$45.34 $136.90 $136.90Assistant Consultant Austin Kozlowski$34.26 $103.44 $103.44Assistant Consultant Andrew Manning$38.02 $114.80 $114.80Assistant Consultant Josh Severn$36.51 $110.24 $110.24Assistant Consultant Mitch Soto$39.91 $120.50 $120.50Assistant Consultant Seth Taylor$40.90 $123.49 $123.49Assistant Consultant Darrin Trageser$61.50 $185.69 $185.69Description Rate TotalReproductions At Cost $3,733.73Equipment Rental Digital Camera @$50/day $200.00Equipment Rental GPS Unit @ $95/day $950.00Equipment Rental Boat @ $100/day $0.00Equipment Rental Sound Meter @ $50/day $0.00Postage and Delivery At Cost $1,060.17Surveys and Reports At Cost $957.10Mikesell Historical Consulting At Cost $13,724.00Terry A. Hayes Associates (TAHA)At Cost $17,279.00Egret, Inc. At Cost $19,406.25Native American Monitor At Cost $26,333.75Backhoe Operator and Backhoe At Cost $1,660.00Airola, Wildlife Biologist At Cost $3,800.00By signing here, you agree to the terms above, and attest that all information is accurate and true.CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED PERSON SIGNATURE1. List all Professional and Supervisory staff by Classification and Name. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, a current payroll document identifying their actual base hourly rate shall be provided with every invoice where an unlisted staff bills time. The approved flat hourly billing rates for all employees will be calculated and reimbursed based on their actual base hourly rates per the date noted above unless CITY Project Manager assigns a fair and reasonable flat hourly billing rate for selected employees. For staff not listed by name but by classification only, the reimbursement will not exceed the approved flat hourly billing rate for that classification. Approved flat hourly billing rates for new employees hired after the date of this cost proposal will not exceed (or shall be in line with) the rates of similar personnel with similar experience listed on this cost proposal. The approved flat hourly billing rate shall be all-inclusive, including all mark-ups, fringe, and overhead expenses and profit.2. Key Staff shall be determined by CITY Project Manager. (i.e., named Project Manager, a specific Principal Engineer, a specific Structural Engineer, etc. Note Key staff with an "X" in the Key Staff column.3. The employees' actual base hourly rates used to negotiate the flat hourly billing rates in this 10-H Form are the rates that were effective per the date noted above. Addition of new staff, new classifications, or addition of a SUBCONTRACTOR not previously listed on the approved 10-H Form(s) shall require written approval from the CITY. No work shall commence until the approval is provided by the CITY. New staff shall be paid at the same or lower approved flat hourly billing rate of the previously approved or similar classification. In addition, if the substitution involves Key Staff, CONTRACTOR must request and justify the need for the substitution and obtain approval from CITY Project Manager. Substituted Key Staff shall be as qualified as the original. 4. Approved flat hourly billing rates include all standard equipment including laptop, camera, cell phone, truck, standard personal safety equipment. CITY Project Manager shall approve any other direct costs.5. Note employees/classifications that are subject to prevailing wage requirements with an "X" in the Prevailing Wage column. Prevailing Wage specified is based on current Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for any future adjustments to the prevailing wage, including but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the DIR. CONTRACTOR is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed at the above listed approved flat hourly billing rates.6. Overtime may be reimbursed to classifications where it is required by their union contracts (Prevailing Wage classifications). Overtime will not be charged unless prior written approval is received by CITY Project Manager. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR at the approved overtime rates noted above. CONTRACTOR shall pay prevailing wage employees per prevailing wage guidelines. 7. Local transportation costs resulting from commuting to and from the employee's residence to the office or job site are not reimbursable.8. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for costs to relocate its staff to the geographic area of the contract. The Project will not reimburse CONTRACTOR for any per diem.9. ODC items are to be in compliance with Code of Federal Regulations, Title 48 Part 31 [Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) cost principles] and the firm's company-wide allocation policies and charging practices with all clients including federal government, state government, local agencies and private clients.

Sacramento City CouncilApril 14, 2026

Sacramento City Council
April 14, 2026